CALENDAR

It is often remarked that Communism did the White race a major favour, helping to preserve it in its Eastern homelands, and that since its fall in 1989, those areas have become subjected to the same destructive tides of feminism, low-birth rates, and multiculturalism that has overwhelmed the West. At the same time we are supposed to be saddened that America has just returned an essentially Communist president. Is there perhaps not something of a paradox here?

There are many kinds of poverty but most forms of it are relative, not having the same kind of gee-gaw as thy neighbor. Those brought up on the classics, and I mean the real classics, know this. Poverty is also the thing that people fear the most. But most forms of poverty are good in that they are healthy, whereas the opposite is true of most kinds of affluence. I now realize that one of the main drives of my life has been an untiring quest for poverty, which combined with my lust for wealth has seen me kind of break even.

But back to America, the epitome of wealth: Why has America declined? We all instinctively know the answer to that – a lack of poverty or the fact that any poverty that still remains is in all the wrong areas where it can do little good, because poverty doesn’t benefit all people equally. It certainly doesn’t benefit Black people. In Africa, which we are constantly told is a wonderland of natural resources, an untold richness of poverty has had negligible beneficial effects. But for White people it’s a different story. We have always thrived on poverty, yet we have always sought its opposite.

Having Romney and Ryan in the White House there was a very slim chance that America could have somehow extricated itself from the approaching fiscal crunch and long-term economic hollowing-out, and got back to being a living, growing economy. But if the last 50 years of multiculturalism have taught us anything it is that a living growing economy, without an inoculation of nationalism, is the worst thing for Whites.

A “living growing economy” means women drawn into the workforce, which means depressed wages for men and stressed out women, leading to retail therapy, ratty relationships, mass prostitution, plummeting birthrates, etc., etc. A “living growing economy” also means mass immigration and outsourcing, which means more White displacement into non-traditional jobs, as well as a bloated and pointless education sector, which intuitively realizing the roots of its growth, creates the cultural conditions to support that disease.

With Obama in the White House, it now looks like America will have a sluggish stagnant economy, with higher taxes producing less revenue and a withering private sector. There will be more government created Mickey Mouse jobs, more attempts to extract value from the US’s military might and global positioning, a plummeting dollar producing minor but temporary upticks in employment, and more centralization ‘justified’ by the growing economic and social chaos. Possibly this situation will maintain itself for the next 10 to 30 years.

But how does such a Crypto-Socialist system (a.k.a. “A Generous America”) work out for the various ethnic groups? Somebody said, whether in jest or not, that with this election America has finally become a Latin American nation. For White nationalists worried about becoming a minority that’s the best news possible, because why would somebody in a Latin American nation actually want to emigrate to a Latin American nation? Put like that you see how pointless it sounds.

If Romney and Ryan had managed to pull off the nearly impossible task of reviving the US economy, you could be sure that ever more Latinos would have poured into the country. Of course the welfare still looks pretty attractive to someone living in a Mexican toilet, but the economic logic of a crap US economy will see this being placed increasingly round the U-bend.

The Obamacrats have discovered that thanks to the stupidity/ naivety/ political correctness/ White-self-loathing/ desire to be fashionable/ etc. of the female and youth demographics they can get elected without flooding the country with hordes of immigrants. Having more immigrants thus becomes extremely expensive overkill at a time when the kitty is not only bare but stuffed with IOUs that are now catching fire.

Rather than a welfare cornucopia for an exploding underclass, Obama’s America will be a country of economic flat-lining and creeping austerity. This will eat away at welfare in whatever is the most politically painless form available. This will discourage immigration and also help to reduce birthrates. All that Democrat pro-abortion propaganda ain’t for nothing. For cultural and economic reasons, it becomes increasingly likely that the only demographic having big families in this dystopia will be rural or small-town Whites with a hint of the Messianic in their lives.

Detroitization – the phenomenon of non-Whites taking over a city built up by Whites and them casually destroying it because there are always plenty more to move onto, or handouts to be gained by failure – will be a lot less possible in the kind of economy that Obama’s victory ushers in. In the future, the rule will be that if you make your bed you lie in it, with increasingly austere and dysfunctional welfare provision providing a safety string rather than a safety net.

The diverse and dysfunctional cities could well become the demographic equivalent of death camps, as all the abuses of urban life, a failing economy, and the inevitable curtailing of welfare combine with the establishment’s endorsement of non-progenitive sexuality. Romney and Ryan attacking welfare mums was always going to be a tricky act. America’s abortion-endorsing, women-loving Black president should have no problem.

Whisper it, don’t shout it, but with Obama in the White House and all the other problems that his election is a symbol of, the long downward curve of White racial replacement may be about to bend the other way.

12 Responses to “Is Obama the unwitting savior of White America?”

When the fiat currency dies we need to split up into at least six countries, Miami, California, Mid West, NE, Alaska, and Hawaii. Build a fence, pass a maximum minority residency allotment, 5% maybe, and live well. Let the Jews have Miami and the NE, the Mexicans California. When the fiat currency dies take advantage of it.

Fascinating article by Mr. Liddell. His predictions are definitely not the same as some other pro-white activists I’ve read, most notably Dr. MacDonald. I’m not sure austerity will be forced onto America. The demand for handouts will be so high that austerity might be impossible. I think America is much more likely to end with a bang (ala the French Revolution) then a whimper. And no matter how bad the economy gets, forced integration will never stop. Eventually whites won’t be allowed to flee areas decimated by blacks, Mexicans, and Muslims. The end goal is white genocide. We have to keep that in mind in everything we analyze. Everything the left does inexorably advances white genocide.

The topic of women working is interesting. I really don’t think most women enjoy it. I don’t. I wish I could be at home cleaning and taking care of children instead of facing the garbage each day that I really don’t think women are designed to have to face.

At every job I have had, I have broken down crying at least once when things get stressful. I try to make sure I only do that in front of women every time, since men, understandably, don’t want to see it or deal with it, nor should they have to. I also usually am at the receiving end of cattiness from other females. Men, I have noticed, are up front and honest when they don’t like each other. Women, on the other hand, talk about each other behind each others’ back.

Yes, I have been guilty of being on both ends of that. This sort of cattiness creates tension in the workplace and interferes with getting work done, and it is something male coworkers don’t want to have anything to do with and that male bosses don’t want to hear about.

I don’t enjoy work at all to be honest. I think within this movement we need to focus on the root causes in our society that are forcing women to work. I think that is a much better alternative than white men in this movement accusing most white women of being feminists and being angry towards them. Focus on the root of the problem; not the symptom.

Why am I working? Well, part of it is because I have to for financial reasons and the other part is because I had a lot of pressure from my father to go to college. When am I happiest? It is when I am preparing a meal for my boyfriend or cleaning his apartment when he is still at work. Why can’t I spend my entire life doing that?

You know I am not disrespectful of women, but I find that ironic when I hear women today bitch and complain about working, when these were the same women who wanted to have the same rights and what not as men. “We don’t make as much as men” one told me. I said, “Yes, but being a woman, you have special work rights that I as a man don’t have. You get maternity leave, meaning your boss will get sued if they hire someone else while you are out on leave. You can get promotions and raises simply because you are a woman. If you are an attractive woman, lots of men will buy something from you just because of your looks.”

With a few exceptions, I don’t much care working in an office with young women as my bosses/supervisors/coworkers. Here’s why: Many of them complain, they gossip, they act like it’s a popularity contest there instead of running a business, not showing up to work (on time/at all), always on their cell phones, and they would freak out about things that not even a young MALE boss would. Not saying my male workers or males bosses were perfect, but I more often found the work problems being around young women than young men. However, I don’t mind working with older women: they are generally more mature and don’t complain.

Personally, I would like it if men could/would earn enough money so the women could stay home and raise the children. Our grandparents and countless generations before them had that system and families were much more intact and the divorce rate wasn’t so high.

It is a fact that many women in the workforce would rather have males as supervisors. Women supervisors and managers tend to rule on emotion rather than logic and are more apt to promote their own “favoritism” which can be detrimental to the company’s success.
There is nothing wrong with wanting to be a “stay at home” partner and mom. We would be better off if that were the case . . .

liberalssuck, I can assure you I was never one of those women who demanded to be equal to men. As I say in my post, I work for financial reasons and then the other reason is because there was pressure from my father to be successful in life. I know he was only looking out for me. Anyways, my point is not to blame most of these women for the fact that they have to work. Look further into the root causes that are forcing women to take on male roles they aren’t suited for.

I just read your post again and I am confused about a lot of your wording. Did you write that post to disagree with me? How are we even in disagreement on this topic in the first place? Most of what you said was pretty much an echo of what I said right before you.

I think the only difference is that I am stressing that it does no good whatsoever to be blaming white women all the time for the fact that they have to take on male roles these days. You mention that these women you work with who complain were the same ones who wanted to be equal to men in the first place. Well, how do you know most women you work with were saying that at first or had those attitudes? And on top of all of this, as I have said before, who was it that gave women the right to work in the same positions as men in the first place? Women didn’t do all that on their own.

This is the problem with communicating through writing. We should all be meeting at these conferences and talking face to face .

Something else I want to add is that most white males I talk to look at me funny when I go on and on about my traditional and outdated views on gender roles. Feminism is an ideaology that has infected both genders in our race, and it was started by liberals. Blame the root cause; not the women.

No, I was not disagreeing with you. I was just adding my two cents. I was talking about white women who want the equal rights of a man (work, equal pay, etc), yet they want men to take care of them and pay their bills. You’re right; and I have always stated that the white men and white women are equally responsible for where we are right now. You’re also right in that it’s probably different having these conversations face to face than in writing. My apologies.

Another thing: I agree that liberalism has destroyed both men and women and both white and black races. They say welfare destroyed the black race. Well, I say feminism has destroyed the white race. Both welfare and feminism were created and pushed my liberals. I hold white men and white women accountable for why we find ourselves in these predicaments.