Exposing Brahminism…

Tag Archives: buddhism

The present shape of Hindu history, beliefs and ideas are result of propaganda that started after British took initiative to reform the savage practices and beliefs like sati (bride burning), untouchability that were prevalent in India.

The propaganda was started by societies like Arya Samaj, Brahmo Samaj etc. and led by Vivekanand in the West. Their task became easier after British coined the word “Hinduism” to describe multitude of beliefs and cults that people of India practiced. The propaganda became vicious after RSS and Hindu Mahasabha were founded in the first half of 19th century. They constructed so-called greatness of Sanatan Dharma through lies, deceits and fabrications. After India got independence History of India was re-written by Brahmin academicians, which is totally false and not backed by facts.

Truth about its origin

Hinduism is not oldest religion as vicious propaganda by Hinduvta leaders and supporters trying to assert. In fact its origin goes back to early 18th century and thus originated far later than other religions like Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

Let’s discuss how this religion is originated.

After closely watching the filth in subcontinent, the Persian named the inhabitants as ‘Sindhu’. Basically Sindhu means a thief, thug, cunning, ugly or dark. The Persians were astounded by cunningness and tendencies of these people to cheat and con others. The book ‘Lughet-e-Kishwari’ clearly mention the words like kala, Ghulam, chor, raahzan,barda,sia faam and other degenerating words to describe these people. In Persian ‘Hind-e-falak’ means the black of the sky and Saturn.

The word Hindu was first coined by the Muslim scholar Al-Biruni, who was the first person to document about the people living across the Sindhu river in the 11th century C.E. It was the British who coined the word ‘Hinduism’ in early 18th century and thus giving unitary shape to varied ritualistic and pagan cults prevalent in India.

According to the New Encyclopedia Britannica 20:581, Hinduism was a name given in English language in the Nineteenth Century by the British to the multiplicity of the beliefs and faiths of the people of the Indus land. The British writers in 1830 gave the word ‘Hinduism’ to be used as the common name for all the beliefs of the people of India excluding the Muslims and converted Christians.

It is noteworhy that the word ‘Hindu’ is not found in any of the classical writings of India. Nor can it be found in the classical Indian languages, such as Sanskrit or Tamil. In fact, the word ‘Hinduism’ has absolutely no origins within India itself. Still, it persists, and traditions as diverse as Shaivism and Jainism, Shaktism and Vaishnavism, have been described as ‘Hinduism.’ This may work as a matter of convenience, but ultimately it is inaccurate

In ancient India you had either a yogi, a bhakta, a tantric, a sanyasi, a sankhya vadin, a vedantin, a lokayata, a rishi, a muni, a pandit, a pragna, a yogini, a devi, a swami, a Saivite, a Vaishnavite, a siddha or Buddha, but no Hindu

Spiritualism of Savages

Hinduism is a religion that openly encourages untouchability, preaches ignorance and superstitious beliefs and worst of all, perpetuate a chauvinistic culture. The Hindu religion is brutally savage to women. They are being raped and eve-teased all the time. Most marriages in India are arranged marriages. The marriage is a sham where women are exploited and made to sacrifice their feelings in order to fit into a male-dominated society’s fixations with “honour. It is a religion of apartheid and parasitism because the way they treat Dalits. Dalits are treated worse than animal and casteism is many times worse than Racism.

Hinduism – the so called Sanathana Dharma – is just old ritualistic beliefs of animal worship, incestuous intercourse and animal sacrifice. Animal and child sacrifice were integral part of Hinduism, though child sacrifice reduced to great extent after arrival of Brtish.

Representation of Hinduism in the West

The view presented to West about humane quality is totally a sham.

After Independence , lot of Brahmins and so-called upper caste educated people started rewriting the degenerate history of People in Subcontinent. Hinduism basically adopted Many aspects from Buddhism, meditation, perseverance and other teachings of Buddha were copied and packaged as Hindu inventions for Western Audience.

The Reality of Hinduism

Hinduism and Hindu Scriptures in essence basically emphasize more of ritual Sacrifices and Killing of animals,Children, Women as a sacrifice to the Gods- Some Purana’s even portray Incestuous relationship between Gods,Gods molesting their mothers, Female Goddesses fornicating with their sons and Male Gods cursing their wires. Worse even Hindu gods are meat eaters; Vegetarianism was adopted by upper caste after they observed its significance from Buddhists.

Hindu sexual morality comes from Arabs, Monogamy is not part of Hindu cult, basically it was adopted from arabs. Hindu culs basically practiced open air sexual rituals ,incest, wife sharing, penis worship, Vagina Worship, and other sexual perversions are very much part of Hindu cults. Hindu Gods like Krishna had intercourse will millions of Women, he even use to molest women by stealing their clothes or by peeping into their Dressing room and observing them in toilets.

These texts are not worthy to be called as spiritual. There is nothing spiritual in those Books, other than preaching Extreme sense of “Solipsism” -Krishna Preaching Arjuna that “kartha (Doer) and Kriya(Work),Karma is him”- “Everything in this world is representation of Mahavishnu, The Evil, Good,lust, Desire- Everything is him- Only he exists and rest is a lie (“Jaganmaya”- “Universal Illusion”)”

Krishna Says to Arjuna that entire Universe is an illusion. only he exists, he is the truth ..and whatever he does or he preaches is truth.

This message is shows Extreme sense of solipsism in Hindu religion-

When Arjuna is in confusion about the morality. Krishna tells him to forget the morality as “Morality by definition is Vishnu(Krishna)”-

Which means there is no morality, it’s an illusion- Only morality is to worship yourselves as you are the Brahman.

“Worship your “Self”, do whatever you wish, Entire world exists because of you, Only you are real and rest is an illusion, world exists to service your whims”- this is the final Adhyaya(Chapter) of Bhagavat Gita.

Where krishna preaches supreme arrogance and solipsism to Arjuna when he asks about the morality .this is the prime reason why Hinduism and Hindus basically are incapable of Self reflection.This is the reason why for most Hindus every act is justified as long as it work in their favor.

Conclusion

Hinduism is a socio-political system of control. It is greatest religion fraud ever that still going on. Its very foundation is based on lies, deceits, hypocrisy which translates into endemic corruption prevalent in all walks of life.

Dr. Babasaheb Bhimji Rao Ambedkar has often been portrayed as unpatriotic, traitor and criticized for sabotaging Indian Freedom struggle. This biased outlook of the non-dalit people, especially the upper castes have found reflection in mainstream history books and narratives. Simply they hate Ambedkar because he was able to dent into their traditional privileges and succeeded giving Dalits some teethes in form of reservation in education and employment and political representation.

It is because of Ambedkar that India has been able to march forward amidst extreme yet conflicting diversities. It is because of him Hinduism still a majority religion. It is because of his progressive ideas that the western notions of equality and justice have gained some ground otherwise in an extreme unequal and unjust hierarchical social order.

When Ambedkar was tasked to frame constitution of free India by Gandhi and Nehru, he had a great opportunity to vent his frustration and anger against society by breaking India into warring provinces and states. Did he do that? No, he did not. In fact a segment of brain-dead upper castes were demanding to model India after United States. They had proposed to name India as United States of India. Had Ambedkar listened to them or had he had any malicious intent Indian would have now succumbed as a nation. India would have collapsed like erstwhile USSR or Yugoslavia.

The unique type of federalism that Ambedkar introduced in India is the main driving force behind India as a unified nation. The sweeping power to center in matter of defense, finance and national security has made India a center led federalism. There is no scope for a state or region to demand secession from the country. Because of this there is no secession of any state or region from India since independence despite occasional demands for separate country like Khalistan, Gorkhaland etc.

Ambedkar had deep knowledge about the extreme unequal Indian society and the systematic exploitation and oppression of Dalits through centuries. He himself has experienced the trauma of untouchability. He could easily have converted to a foreign religion like Islam and Christianity. In fact Muslim and Christian clerics tried their very best to convert him to their respective religion but Ambedkar refused fair and square. Instead he chose an indigenous religion, i.e, Buddhism to get converted into. He chose Buddhism because he loved the country and did not forget his indigenous root.

Now let’s pause and ask: “What would have happened had Ambedkar converted to Islam or Christianity?” Obviously, Dalits would have converted to any of thesee religions en masse. This move could have potentially helped many Dalits escaping the caste oppression and exploitation of Hindu social order as these religions don’t have hierarchical orders. Ambedkar was certainly not aware of it. He instead chose Buddhism, which has its root in Hinduism. He loved the country and the progressive ideas and elements in Indian culture.

Ambedkar’s disagreement with Gandhi and his opposition to Poona fast was rooted in his concern for future of Dalits in Independent India. He feared Dalits would be again subjected to the exploitative social order of the past, which the Mughals and British had weakened considerably during their rules. He was opposed to Gandhi who advocated a charity-based approach towards issues of Dalits. Gandhi had no concerns for Dalits. Whatever activism he had for Dalit issues was essentially to counter Ambedkar. Any person who had rudimentary knowledge of Indian history knows the fact.

The above discussion should make it clear that Ambedkar’s opposition and disagreement with Gandhi and other leaders should not be misconstrued as treachery or unpatriotic. At no point he opposed demand fro independence. Unlike many RSS leaders, he never sided with British. He was true patriot and it is reflected well in his deeds.

Author’s Note:On personal note I don’t agree with Babasaheb’s idea of converting to Buddhism. The best defense for Dalits would have been a resolute offence. Instead of remaining within Hindu fold and crying foul of discrimination and exploitation, it would have been better idea to reject the Hinduism and embrace a religion that treat them like human and ensures equality of members. It would have gone a long way removing the inferiority complex that Dalits were made to acquire right from their birth. The exposure to Islam or Christianity would have ensured for Dalits that the caste system/Hinduism is not all that about life and this world.