Full Comment: I was greatly saddened although not entirely surprised by the comments of an ex-lawyer. Lets be clear; this is a serious matter and anyone who decides to walk this path must be prepared not only to educate or even re-educate themselves but to adopt a whole new mindset and outlook on everything they thought they once knew. Therefore, it is incumbent upon anyone offering guidance in such matters, to exercise a modicum of 'tough love' in order to help those who might otherwise be tempted to take unnecessary risks with their liberty. In case you are unaware, many on this path have found themselves taken into custody (not as a result of the Ucadia model I hasten to add) but only those with absolutely no sense of responsibility or moral compass could possibly object for the heartfelt need by FOC to exercise a duty of care over those of us trying to break free of this madness and reading from Ucadia. I hope you will read this reply and take a firm grasp of your ego (I have no time for circular arguments) and re-think your whole approach - for your own sake. I say this without malice or anger

Full Comment: I wish to Thank you Frank, for Great synopsis of the last years progress in/of Ucadia, and for the projection towards the future .... and also for your years best wishes to all us that are of like minded in standing with you in the belief and support of Ucaida , and but not the least Thank you Frank O'Collins for your tenacity and fortitude of your vision or in following your quest of/for and
To fight for the right, To right the unrightable wrong, No matter how hopeless, To try when your arms are too weary, To fight the unbeatable foe,
This was your quest, To run where the brave dare not go, No matter how far, To be willing to march into Hell, For a heavenly cause,
And I know if you'll only be true, To this glorious quest, Without question or pause,
That the world will be better for this,
That one man, scorned and covered with scars, To bear with unbearable sorrow, Still strove with his last ounce of courage,
To dream the impossible dream, To reach the unreachable star.
Yours Truly
Donn Quixote, aka/fka, Danthewightman.

Full Comment: Not sure what the slightly, ah, loaded comment from the ex-lawyer is about [its all in the tone] . . I have found this all very easy to comprehend . . and do not find any 'belligerence' or 'berating' here. I personally find the entire tone thoroughly enjoyable - excellence and true competence can only be realised when there is honesty, and one person's honesty is another's offence. Idiots clearly abound 'out there', so I absolutely love hearing someone actually call it like it is and not pad around happy clapping and being overly polite more than is necessary - how refreshing. Leave the feelgood internet soft soap to the gurus, I say. Thing is, there are many people not reading any of it, and then ringing in with questions that are answered in the written material in a very clear fashion!
That's okay, obviously, but a good read will clear it all up, and spare those of us who are getting into it more deeply having to hear Frank politely ask people over and over to perhaps actually read the stuff, not just skim it, or not just listen to the audios. It is an unveiling like no other, but at the end of the day must be done by yourself.
The youtube 4 part presentation is very good indeed, and will help a great deal if you are having problems, as there's no doubt that the concepts are simple but large.
Thanks!

Full Comment: In TalkShoe episode 59, I was saddened to listen to the great Frank O'Collins berating listeners for not reading the canons and then for not understanding them when they did read the canons.
As a retired lawyer (who practised property law for over 30 years but) who never felt comfortable with it all, who has always been looking for the truth (and found some with Icke, Clif High, Tsarion, and Bonacci, among many others who have worked hard to puzzle out parts of it) I must state that I too find the canons difficult to understand despite my lengthy training in the art of the complicated.
Listening to Mr O'Collins reading just the first 3 canons in episode 59, which he repeatedly (and rather belligerently) insisted were very clear, made me wonder whether it was worth going on (having only recently discovered Ucadia and working my way backwards through the magnificent series). No Mr O'Collins, even those 3 canons were not crystal clear to me, even though you believe they must be.
Please Mr O'Collins: if you are time and again being told by people (most of whom are afraid to upset you) that the canons are difficult to understand, then take notice of the feedback you are getting! Yes, people are busy and want an easy route but it is just as lazy of you to lump all that feedback into the "lazy" category. Most listeners are desperate to understand!
I would also say that I have been making rough transcript/notes of talkshow episodes 59-69 for my own benefit but have found quite a bit of it to be presented in a somewhat confused and jumpy manner. For instance, despite listening to parts more than once, I have not been able to understand the yahoodi history as a logical story yet I am very keen to find out about this aspect of true history.
I hope this does not get lumped into the troublemaker category that Mr O'Collins rails against at the start of almost every episode. You are doing a fantastic job, Mr O'Collins, but the surprisingly frequent hostile tone and the constant blaming of your audience does not compliment you - and does not feel good to listen to, as it gets repeated on every single episode. (Is it really appropriate that these words are the most repeated in every single episode I have listened to: silly, stupid, disruptive - in episode 59 in particular, this was repeatedly and before the angry caller near the end!)
For potential, Ucadia deserves more than 5 stars but for practical usability and actual understandability, less than 3 stars unfortunately.

Full Comment: These programs open up a whole new dimension on our existence. I consider myself a sovereign American. Of course there is new data coming everyday. Is the U S a corporation? There may be new evidence on this matter from Paul Andrew Michell.
Well not new but newly heard I suppose. I did use the statutory law in question in a pleading once that the government fell silent upon.
Thanks Frank and God bless.
I am Geoffrey Franklin of the Finn clan

Full Comment: The most PROFOUND knowledge, wisdom, Truth I've ever come across. UCADIA has deciphered the Slave Code that entraps us in our daily lives and has provided for us new models of society which are Lawfully superior.