Baltic Anomaly Looks Like A Crash Site - New Sonar Image

Major News - Baltic Anomaly Looks Like A Crash Site - NEW SONAR IMAGE

From the video at 0:18

In a video released today, the latest high dimensional images shows what can only be described as a crash site on the bottom of the Baltic Sea.
Complete with gouge in a underwater mountain and the long skid mark on the sea floor. In this video you will hear the voices of diver Stefan
Hodgeborn, Peter Lindberg and Dennis Asberg.

Wasn't released today, however, haven't seen this posted yet. I'm not well, versed in the info about it but it has caught my attention when first
shared, figured the update would be relevant. With that it looks like there's more to it than previously thought, with the "long skid". As the
update is describing more so the anomaly as a crash, what you say ATS?

If that is a crash site why is the channel the UFO created so much smaller that the UFO that created it ?
It looks like more evidence that this so called anomaly is Glacial in origin , its time to drop this dead donkey and move on at least until the
documentary is finally released .

Originally posted by NoRulesAllowed
A crash site of what? A craft made from stone? I thought we knrw for a long time already it's not a craft but a stone structure of some sorts.

These tests show that a Basalt rock lying on the surface of the anomaly has burned organic material on it, and thus provides scientists with
another piece of information.
Scientists’ first impression was that the anomaly was dated at least 15,000 to 140,000 years old. A volcanic explanation can be ruled out due to the
fact that there has been no active volcanic activity in the region for approximately 150 million years.

It's possible that the "skid channel" could have been partially covered by sand/sediment over the years.
Still I find this mystery very interesting.
Why is taking so long for any real evidence or facts to emerge?

Not sure about the glacial theory, looks less plausible, than at least what others have proposed.

Not according to Volker Brüchert, associate professor of geology at Stockholm University who has examined some of the returned rock samples .

"It's good to hear critical voices about this 'Baltic Sea mystery,'" Brüchert wrote in an email. "What has been generously ignored by the
Ocean-X team is that most of the samples they have brought up from the sea bottom are granites and gneisses and sandstones." These, he explains, are
exactly what one would expect to see in a glacial basin, which is what the Baltic Sea is — a region carved out by glacial ice long ago.

Along with the mundane rocks, the divers also gave him a single loose piece of basaltic rock, a type of rock that forms from hardened lava. This is
out of place on the seafloor, but not unusual. "Because the whole northern Baltic region is so heavily influenced by glacial thawing processes, both
the feature and the rock samples are likely to have formed in connection with glacial and postglacial processes," he wrote. "Possibly these rocks
were transported there by glaciers." news.yahoo.com...

I'm thinking...is it possible...if it is a craft of some sorts...could it reach the bottom with enough force to skid along the floor. If it crashed
from air...the water resistance would either destroy it or slow it down significantly ?

If that is a crash site why is the channel the UFO created so much smaller that the UFO that created it ?
It looks like more evidence that this so called anomaly is Glacial in origin ,

that's a weird question. What do you know about ufos that makes you think the channel should be "larger"(?)than the ufo? Maybe the ufo slid along
on its side edge? And what in the world makes you a "glacial channel" expert?

I'm thinking...is it possible...if it is a craft of some sorts...could it reach the bottom with enough force to skid along the floor. If it crashed
from air...the water resistance would either destroy it or slow it down significantly ?

ahhh, but wait a minute- you can't go there unless you know something about ufos that we don't. They need special characteristics (beyond
conventional craft) if they can zoom in and out of the oceans so it is wrong to assume under those conditions they would act like any conventional
solid object hitting water.

why is it so unreasonable to assume the rocks were kicked up during the crash and settled back down on top of the craft?

Why is it so unreasonable to believe that given the Baltic's history of Glaciation the eminent professor of geology who has studied the returned
samples is correct and this alleged anomaly is a result of Glacial processes .

Or is it just that its more fun to fantasise and play lets pretend that there's something unusual down there .

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.