* PASSWORD REQUIREDThe Statewatch
European Monitor is a monthly, web-based publication covering
developments in EU justice and home affairs policy. This page
contains links to material on the SEMDOC website which
is PASSWORD CONTROLLED. Document references have been
removed from this version of the monitor. Subscribers to the
Statewatch European Monitor get unlimited access to SEMDOC website
which contains full-text documents, extensive background material
and systematically covers every single measure. For more information
about SEMDOC and to take out a subscription to the Monitor, click here

MADRID
BOMBING / COUNTER-TERRORISM
1. An emergency meeting of the EU's Justice and Home Affairs
Ministers Council will be held on Friday 19 March in Brussels
(the last emergency meeting was held on 20 September 2001). It
will precede the EU Summit (meeting of Prime Ministers) in Brussels
on 25-26 March. See Irish
Presidency press statement (15.3.04).

2. It is likely to result in an update of the EU
Action Plan on Terrorism, the last published version
of which is dated 14 November 2002 (13909/1/02).

3. The Belgian Prime Minister, Guy Verhofstadt, has called for
the EU to set up a new
intelligence centre in the wake of the Madrid bombings.
This would, he suggests, play a coordinating role by bringing
together member state police, security, intelligence agencies
and Europol and by sharing intelligence make an analysis of the
terrorist threat. The Netherlands and Austrian governments are
said to back the idea (Statewatch News Online).

5. Human Rights Experts Opinions and documents relating to the
Commission's independent human rights expert group (link). Statewatch made a detailed submission
to this group in October 2003, setting out twenty-two areas of
concern over EU policy-making, see: Statewatch
submission.

IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM POLICY8.
The Presidency has presented two 'compromise' proposals on outstanding
issues in the draft EC Asylum procedures Directive. These concern
safe
third countries (6871/04, 27.2.04, pdf) and the provision
of legal
advice and assistance: (6797/04, 27.2.04, pdf).

9. Following the adoption
at the February JHA Council of the Decision on financing
expulsions carried out by one member state on behalf
of another(OJ 2004 L 60/55), a guide to the practical implementation ofmutual recognition of expulsion
decisions
has been produced (6142/04, 10.2.04, pdf). Statewatch reported
that the EU is already planning joint
expulsion flights - although the EU Decision authorising
such measures has not yet been adopted. In a highly questionable
attempt to make the joint expulsions more acceptable to the public,
JHA Commissioner Vittorino has called on member states "to
educate their citizens that joint flights have nothing to do
with collective expulsion" (see Statewatch
news online).

10. The Commission has proposed the extension of the European Refugee Fund(COM
(2004) 102) which has also been used to fund expulsions. The initial
European refugee Fund committed 216 million euros to
"support and encourage the efforts made by the Member States
in receiving and bearing the consequences of receiving refugees
and displaced persons". The draft Decision on the European
Refugee Fund referred not to "expulsion" but "voluntary
repatriation"; the adopted Decision, however, dropped the
word "voluntary". According to the European Commission,
"returns" accounted for 21 per cent national Fund activities
between 2000 and 2002, though "the proportion of repatriation
projects has risen sharply", from 15.82% in 2000 to 24.45%
in 2002. Without specifying any figures, the Commission has proposed
the extension of the European Refugee Fund to 2010, envisaging:

two financial phases:
the first from 2005 to 2007, when the amounts allocated would
be broadly similar to those in the current phase, but with a
slight increase, and a second phase, from 2008 to 2010, when
there would a sizeable increase in the allocations, depending
on the new financial perspectives. This increase would enable
the Fund to become more than just a symbolic gesture and to produce
results and have a significant impact not only on the target
groups but also on asylum systems in general.

11. The Commission's proposal
on the creation of an EU Border Police (COM(2003) 687, 11.11.03)
has been revised following EU working party discussions: latest
draft (6226/04, 12.2.04, pdf). Statewatch
analysis showed how the Commission's proposal was hiding
the development of unaccountable, operational bodies under an
ad hoc framework set out in EU Action Plans. A report from the
Strategic Committee on Immigration, Frontiers and Asylum on the
implementation of the EU
Action Plan to combat illegal immigration by sea(15445/03,
28.11.03, adopted by November 2003 JHA Council) shows that the
new Sea Borders Centre, Risk Analysis Centre, Centre of Excellence
(in Dover) are working with Europol, the immigration liaison
officers network and false documents party: implementation
report (5769/04, 29.1.04).

12. A Decision on the creation of an EU network of Immigration
Liaison Officerswas adopted as an A-point by the
JHA Council on 19 February 2004 (15813/03, 7.1.04). However,
it is clear that a de facto network has been operating
for some time. The posting of "immigration liaison officers"
(ILOs) has been a central of tenet of EU immigration policy since
Maastricht. With the larger member states already using ILOs
as part of domestic policy, the EU rationale is that the pool
of EU liaison officers could work for the benefit of all the
member states. A Joint Action on a common framework for the initiatives
of the Member States concerning liaison officers was agreed in
October 1996. This was followed by Council conclusions in November
2000 on the "exchange of information and cooperation between
the Member States in combating illegal immigration networks"
(including the role of ILOs); in May 2001 on "the creation
of a network of national immigration liaison officers to help
control illegal migration flows through the Western Balkan region";
and in June 2002 the Seville European Council called for the
creation of a network of immigration liaison officers before
the end of 2002. These initiatives are not mentioned in the adopted
Decision.

13. The Council has produced a revised draft of the proposal
on the information and coordination network
for migration management(the "Iconet"
proposal, 6058/04, 9.2.04, pdf). Three issues will be "examined
at a later stage": (1) a possible agreement between the
Commission and Europol regarding Europol's participation in Iconet
(on the basis of the current proposal and its legal basis, Europol
would be excluded from participation in the network); (2) "the
German delegation suggested that the network could also be used
for the exchange of personal data between the national contact
points and would submit a more concrete proposal in due time";
(3) the participation of the future Border Agency in the
network can be swiftly carried out once the Agency has been established.

15. A proposal on subsistence
requirements for visa applicants, first made in 2000
but not adopted, has been resurrected (5572/04, 21.1.04). It
would amend the EU Common Consular Instructions to require visa
applicants to prove that they have between 40 and 60 euros per
day for the duration of their stay.

17. The Regulation on financial
and technical assistance to third states for immigration,
asylum and border controls as adopted by the JHA Council in February
(PE-CONS 3968/03, 6.2.04). The budget is 250 million euros for
the period from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2008, of which
EUR 120 million is for the period until 31 December 2006, at
which point the Commission may propose additional funds.

18. The first annual report on implementation
of the ARGO programme 2002-3has been produced(6485/04, 19.4.04, pdf file). The ARGO programme provides
funds for the implementation of EU measures on immigration controls.

19. The EU Working Party on Migration and Expulsion has produced
a questionnaire
on the EU travel document (6147/04, 10.2.04, pdf). It
is the first stage in an evaluation of the usefulness of the
EU travel document "with a view to adopting Council conclusions
and recommendations on its current and future use".

20. The Strategic Committee
on Immigration Frontiers and Asylum has agreed in principle a
standard
form for refusals at borders ( 16120/03, 12.2.04, pdf).
This is to allow the MS to "identify the reasons for a previous
decision to refuse the entry of an alien". The standard
form "includes a categorisation of the possible reasons
for refusal of entry" and provides for an indication "in
the passport of the alien concerned the reason or reasons for
refusal".

POLICING AND CRIMINAL
LAW21.
The Commission has produced a Communication
on crime prevention in the EU (COM (2004) 165). Juvenile,
urban and drug-related crime like domestic burglary, theft from
vehicles or street robbery figure among the main concerns.

24. The Commission's Article 29 Working Party has produced a
data protection report on video surveillance (pdf file).

25. A Regulation on the amendment of the Sirene
manual was adopted by the February JHA Council (5361/04,
28.1.04).

26. The Commission has proposed the establishment of an EU
security research programmeto look at creating "smart"
biometric documents which will "locate,identify and follow
the movement of persons" through "automatic chips with
positioning". Statewatch has examined the role of the "List
of personalities" in drafting the new security agenda
and asks "how much power should they have?"

CIVIL
LAW31. The Commission has produced a revised proposal
for the European
Enforcement Order. The Council has agreed a common position
on the revised proposal and the Commission has produced an opinion
in response.

32. EC ratification of the Convention on international interests
in Mobile
equipmenthas also been proposed(15904/1/02).

36. The EP
rapporteuron PNRhas written to national
parliaments (text of letter, pdf).

37. A
speech by Stefano Rodota, chair of the EU's Article 29
Data Protection Working Party, is also critical of the scheme
in its current form (text of speech, pdf).

38. A draft Commission Decision on the adequacy
of US "undertakings"on data protection
in the EU-US agreement on PNR was agreed at the General Affairs
Council on 16.2.04 (pdf). US
"undertakings",12 January (see
pp 7-10, pdf file).