> On 05/31/2011 12:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:> > > > So ... could you *please* not shelf this idea just because people > > used lkml for what it was invented: argued with each other rather > > forcefully? :-)> > The real issue is that if it can be (semi)trivially bypassed, then > there may not be much reason to do it.

Sure.

> Other than that, Ingo's idea at least have the merit that it would > break only older bootloaders doing things wrong.

I'm wondering, why would it break older bootloaders? It's just a slightly larger than usual kernel image, nothing is visible to the bootloader.