Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Pentagon's Theft of 8.5 Trillion, a Complete Scam, Explained

When there is a hand in the cookie jar stealing all the cookies whenever there are cookies in the cookie jar, the hand needs to be cut off.

If a baseball player uses steroids there can be a Congressional Special Hearing. Steal more that the gross national product and nothing ... that is okay because those who regulate the scammers are the scammers.
[Steven G. Erickson's video upload and favorites channel]
If we are paying taxes to foreign banks and/or corporate entities, aren't we a colony of those UK based banks? Was America ever an independent nation, or has it just been a front for generations of scammers who only played that America was an independent nation?

stevengerickson AT yahoo.com

Against Fascism: Towards the Separation of Business and State

Text and Transcripts to go with video:

by [James Corbett]BoilingFrogsPost.com
February 11, 2014
Since 1996, the United States Department of Defense has accumulated
an $8.5 trillion black hole in its budget. The number is so staggering
that it is quite literally inconceivable. Several times larger than the
annual budget for the entire federal government, it is equivalent to
half of the entire fraudulent debt of the United States government
itself. Aside from a recent report by Reuters or the occasional back-of-the-paper mention in one of the dinosaur media outlets, however, you’d have to turn to Russian state-sponsored media to discover this fact.

An alien visiting earth from another planet could be forgiven for
legitimately questioning why this scandal is virtually unknown while the
details of Justin Bieber’s latest arrest or Miley Cyrus’ latest antics
are literally unavoidable in the cultural zeitgeist. Or why the use of
steroids in Major League Baseball is considered worthy of earnest
Congressional investigation while this unaccounted for $8.5 trillion is
relegated to passing mention in the occasional Congressional hearing.

What seems perplexing from an outside perspective, however, is
mundane reality to those inside the system. The truth is that despite
all the fuzzy rhetoric about republics and inalienable rights and the
rule of law, the United States is nothing but an oligarchy, run by a
handful of international banking syndicates, their multinational
corporate cronies, and the politicians in their back pocket. The
Pentagon budget story is not reported on for the simple reason that it
is the defense contractors that own much of the media, and have intimate relations with those outlets that are not directly under their control.

And the defense contractors, in turn, own the political figures that
decide who receive the government’s defense contracts. The classic
example of this is Dick Cheney. As George H.W. Bush’s Secretary of
Defense, he awarded a contract
to KBR, a Halliburton subsidiary, to investigate the possibility of
contracting out military services to private companies. Unsurprisingly,
KBR concluded this would be a good thing, and soon Halliburton and other
private companies were receiving a larger and larger slice of the
Washington defense budget pie. Also unsurprisingly, Cheney left his post
as Defense Secretary at the end of the Bush Administration and became
CEO of Halliburton.

But this is not the only example of the defense contractor revolving door. As Ryan Dawson of The ANC Report notes in his new e-book, The Separation of Business and State:

“Thomas White, the Secretary of the Army, was involved with Enron as a
senior executive. He unloaded 200,000 shares (12 million dollars’
worth) of their stock during that scandal. While White was serving as
the Vice Chairman of Enron Energy Services, he actively used his
political contacts to give Enron a single bidder contract to privatize
the power supply for Fort Hamilton. He was also fond of using military
jets for personal trips for himself and his wife.”

And:
“Gordon England, the Secretary of the Navy, flipped back and forth
between General Dynamics and Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin is at the
top of the list when it comes to Pentagon contracts and General Dynamics
is usually in the top five. England was the President of General
Dynamics’ Land Systems Division and later became President for General
Dynamics’ entire Fort Worth Division. That Division was sold to Lockheed
and he became a President there.”

Sadly, the list of such blatant conflicts of interest is nearly
endless and by no means limited to the military-industrial complex. The
same is true of the revolving door in the biotech industry around companies like Monsanto and in the healthcare sector, where high-ranking insurance company executives literally write the legislation that mandates everyone to purchase health insurance from the corporations.

The problem is so blatant, so obvious, so out in the open that even
its opponents readily admit to its existence. And yet it continues
without significant opposition from the public. How can this happen?
Because—in a twist that again would be difficult to explain to anyone
not steeped in this system

This is the ultimate example of divide and conquer in action. A
small, readily-identifiable ruling oligarchy that no serious political
observer denies the existence of is able to keep the public from
attacking it by dividing them along ideological grounds so that the
public spends all their time arguing over definitions and splitting
doctrinal hairs instead of attacking the commonly acknowledged enemy.

You couldn’t ask for a more perfect system of control.

Thankfully, the corollary of this divide and conquer strategy is that
it is possible to unite the people against their common enemy simply by
employing some rhetorical strategies of their own.

As we shall see next week, the idea of uniting the public against the
oligarchs is not only possible, it is actually happening in case after
case. But as always it is a question of whether it is enough to push
back against this oligarchical control, or if it is too little, too
late.

How much secret killing, torture, and indefinite detention is Obama, the CIA, the NSA, and other affiliates really responsible for?

Is Obama for foreign corporations and international bankers or is he for average Americans and honoring and protecting the US Constitution?

Text with below video:

Published on Feb 11, 2014

The U.S. government is once again
considering whether or not to use a drone strike to assassinate a u.s.
citizen living overseas who is suspected of terrorism. Watch the video
to see why Ben says despite the appearance of a NEW drone strike
policy... nothing has actually changed.

Obama Admin. Trying To Decide Whether To Assassinate Another U.S. Citizen Overseas

-

If cities like Detroit can be sold in pieces to Canada, or other countries, can't they then ban guns if a foreign country owns US cities after they go bankrupt? They are poorly run, and run into the ground. So, are we going to be taken over, by being bought out?

Billionaire, and former New York City Mayor, Michael Bloomberg has aligned with mayors of many cities to illegally ban and confiscate American guns. Should officials, and former officials who are trying to dismantle the US Constitution to benefit foreign banks and international corporations be arrested and prosecuted? [My links]
Why are Americans renouncing their citizenship in record numbers?

Protecting children is of the utmost responsibility of all. No actions taken are going too far. So, banning anything that can be dangerous to children should be enacted and enforced.

But, also keep in mind police in the US have no obligation to answer calls, including 911 calls in a timely manner, or at all. There #1 priority is protecting the integrity of the system. If the system is actually to benefit international bankers and corporate interests, their interests are your interests, right? So to best serve them, this includes getting rid of small business owners, the self-employed, gun owners, and the outspoken about judicial misconduct, police brutality, and public corruption because these institutions best serve the corporate state.

A
citizen speaks to the City Council in opposition to a local "loaded
carry" ban ordinance one of the Councilors has brought for
consideration. No facts, figures, statistics, or other evidence of any
existing problem has been presented by the sponsoring Councilor. She has
however, made emotional pleas to "protect the children", dropped the
"Sandy Hook" tragedy as supporting gun regulation, and other such
bullshit.

She actually said "I know there are statistics out there but I didn't look them up". WTF

Meanwhile,
the Chief of Police has stated that the town has NEVER had an incident
involving an open carrier. Hmmmmm no problem? Why an ordinance then?
Oh yeah....to FEEL good.

This citizen uses satire to point out the idiocy of the proposed ordinance.

MORE INFORMATION
about the speaker and the organization "Citizens for a REALLY Safe Ashland" can be found at the following links:

www.citizensforareallysafeashland.org

www.libertyashland.org

www.vigofox.com"

COPYRIGHT INFORMATION:
My copyright notice is ONLY for my editing work to clip, sync, etc. the video and audio.
This
video (including editing of camera angles) was shot by Rogue Valley
Television (RVTV), a partnership of public entities in Southern Oregon.

American Leaders JOKE About Dead Veterans and Children

What the real leaders are, past and present, is exposed in this video. Get a glimpse. It isn't pretty. It is reality.

Text with video:

Published on Feb 4, 2014

American political leaders of both
parties are war mongering psychopaths. They do not care about you, your
family, or the lives of innocent people. Watch as they laugh and make
jokes about suffering and death.

Very poor English speakers like Henry Kissinger with Nixon, and [Zbigniew Brzezinski] under Jimmy Carter. The almost non-English speakers seemed like they were really in charge of our money, wars, and policy. The puppeteer behind Obama isn't so easily identified.

The 7 embedded videos aren't new that I watched, I found it as one video and embedded that one. I could not find them here on LiveLeak. I just watched all 7 videos, back to back. They were loaded on youtube when only 10 minutes and smaller file sizes would be accepted. I haven't found a simpler explanation of what occurred in the past and what is happening now. The videos were actually shot not long after the Bill Clinton and George H. W. Bush contest.

Is the CIA a branch of UK banks? Is the US still a colony of the UK banks? How did the scam start? What are the names of individuals involved?

Do your own research. Look up the names. Do word searches. Are rightful owners of land and their labor being swindled by international criminals who print actually worthless paper? Why are we paying interest on money we did not agree to borrow? Would you like to understand all the warring and bait and switch still going on? Does the Federal Reserve System ensure that we will remain a colony of UK elite bankers?

Who are the Rothchilds ... really? Should these criminal families who have wrecked and abused humanity for centuries be rounded up and punished?

Text with video:

Uploaded on Jan 10, 2011

Eustace Mullins (1923-2010),
America's foremost bank examiner, appears for the first time in a full
studio production interview with "The Mouth of the South," Bobby Lee.
Mullins, a renowned author, lecturer and scholar reveals over 50 years
of intensive research in an incredible true story and documentation of
the conspiracy against the patriotic, hard working families of middle
America.