Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> Yet if the spec had had a hasFeature check, it would be returning
"true"
> right now, since they would have implemented that too. So hasFeature()
> doesn't solve your problem either.
If a user-agent returns "true" from hasFeature() without actually
providing a conforming implementation of the feature, then that's a bug
in the user-agent, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.