If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

They close with Moss six years ago and Randy is an alltime NFL great......Mike Wallace is a very good player and best deep threat in the NFL today but will never be what Moss was in his prime...Other factor is Tom Brady is now 36.........Brady won't even make it to 3 more Super Bowls so somebody thinking they will win 3 more Super Bowls with Mike Wallace is just stupid.....

I don't believe Weak actually thinks that but he likes saying extra drama like that to get a rise out of people and it's working for him.

either way, 5 years around 50 million is a steal for the chiefs. 6 years for 43 million is a steal for antonio brown

either way were losing a guy that points points on the board, probably losing his best friend and our starting CB, and we get a #2 WR with an upper tier #2 WR salary. makes no sense

I think we are losing good players going into their prime, but it has everything to do with keeping that defense together for as many super bowl runs as possible, and nothing to do with Antonio Brown's contract (which I agree is a very good contract, and even for a top tier #2, it's not out of line with the league average).

I've been mentally prepared for this all year...

I'd edit your post to :

either way were losing a guy that points points on the board, probably losing his best friend and our starting CB, and in return we were able to keep a bunch of guys chewing up cap space on defense because we wanted to keep a contender together and now we are paying the price

too bad we couldn't cut Harrison and Troy and recoup ALL of their cap space to use towards Wallace and Lewis