- Hot girls with lots of variety of shoots
- Great interaction. Someone in the comment section noted that no one does more to promote (in a good an appropriate way) than Brandi. You can find her on everything from Howard Stern to Naught America.
- Pix available as zips
- Huge backlog more than 360 videos with a good variety (lots of blow job vids, good hardcore and some 3-way action, some anal)
- great set up for social networking in site - easy interactions
- Live shows 1 per week
- Hot MILF if you looking for that genre Brandi is one of the best examples of a MILF on the net!
- She accomplishes what she sets to do (which is more than I can say for a lot of the pro-ams out there)
- content share with other hot girls so you do get to see some other talent on the site
- Cool feature where videos you get suggestions for other videos you might like.

Cons:

- I'm an old fashion guy who like plot with my porn (I know I'm the minority) and Brandi's more an all action kinda girl.
- Working with old equipment most of her videos are 640X480 shoots, it's just time to upgrade
- no network brandi is the only girl you get to enjoy

Bottom Line:

Brandi is great, but I couldn't find enough to stay around for more than a month. She's hot no doubt about it, I just felt like every shoot was the same.

She is great about social networking and you can find her on twitter with everything from football picks to what she up to that week in terms of shoot for others.

The bottom bottom line. It's a good site to check out, but you may not be compelled to stick around long.

I enjoyed my time on the site and will go back. Brandi's got a fun personality and puts herself into the site. It's a lot of fun and good time. She enjoys what she does so it's easy to get into the hot scenes!

-They offer 9.95 for a month deals on certain holidays, so lookout for that. I usually join every 4th of July for the deal.

-For video nuts like myself there is high speed wmv 640x480, Low Speed WMV download with a 320x240 screen, iPod MP4 with a 320x180 screen and QuickTime screen. But really, why would you bother with anything but high speed?

-Kelly is by far my favorite milf in amateur porn and just oozes sexuality. She is a natural blonde beauty with pretty eyes, big natural boobs, and nice round ass. She lives the swinging lifestyle and takes all kinds of different cock, and gets pounded hard in her videos. You will notice some of the other amateur swingers like Anna& Bruce in some of the videos from 4real swingers, and Rio too. Everything is real as expected, no acting and great real orgasms. She usually orgasms at least twice a video. Kelly has a few squirting orgasms on occasion which are extra sexy as well. She also gives the best head to her men.

-Really the only downside to me is the that there is no hd video and really no browsing options to speak of. There are only 2-3 updates a month which stinks too. However this is amateur porn so I kind of like the fact that its not extra high quality because it really gives that amateur feel.

-Bottom line: If you like hot milfs and real unscripted porn like I do, there is no reason not to join.

05-25-1210:11am (Update History)Reason: During my last week of the subscription I was blocked without explanation or reason. See my comment!

Pros:

Hard to find niche material of women between 40 – 62.

All videos are available in HD. Some purist might argue that point, but I found 1280x720p at a total bitrate of 5242 very crisp and clear and it was good enough for me.

Matching Picture Sets (not screen caps) of very good quality at approx. 2000x1300.

Billing by Epoch

Cons:

Very basic set up. No search engine, only the option to choose the model.

The first three links to their latest picture sets were broken.

Unfortunate naming of pictures, they all start with 01, making it necessary to rename if you should be tempted to open more than one zipped set at a time.

Lesbian scenes lack heat and are not very
convincing.

Intrusive upsale attempts to two other sites belonging to the same company.

Slow updates.

Bottom Line:

Okay, here it is. This site is made up of mature Russian women with the most beautiful ones rating as average at best, while the rest would definitely not appeal to our younger porn users. Many of the models are overweight and show signs of a hard life in face and body. I hate to say it because I'll be heaping contempt upon my head, especially by the younger crowd, but I like them a lot.

I love East European women and I especially love older East European women so this site appeals to me greatly.

What doesn't appeal to me is that the site is growing very slowly, possibly due to the fact that it would be difficult to find older women who are willing to participate in lesbian scenes or in a clinical exhibition of their vaginas. It was hard to establish how often the site updates but a reasonable guess would be once a week, alternating between picture sets and videos.

At the moment there are only 11 Lesbian videos and 23 Solo videos available, matched by an equal number of picture sets. As I stated above three of the latest picture solo sets had broken links. We'll see how quickly support will respond to my first complaint regarding the matter.***

***Support responded quickly and links were fixed immediately.

Picture fans please be advised that while they are of excellent quality, many of the models do not undress completely neither do they start completely dressed. However there is great emphasis on the gynaecological aspect of things in all the sets.

Anyway, if you are tired of young things, or are near my age when you start to feel guilty when you look at models that could be your granddaughters' age, okay I do look at times, (or are suffering from an Oedipus complex) this would not be a bad site to subscribe to.

But don't subscribe for a longer period than a month. You'll be long done with the material by then.

+ a lot of scenes with a lot of cool content
+ a lot of girls
+ easy to surf
+ access to a few good mature sites
+ video quality is really good most of the time

Cons:

- most solo scenes are BORING
- alot of lesbian scenes are BORING
- some mature ladies are just ugly
- most girls don't seem to enjoy the action at all, while some fake too much
- some new videos come with a shady video quality

Bottom Line:

I like this site for it's mature content. Some solo scenes are amazing and same goes for lesbian scenes. The thing is a lot of the girls are either ugly, or don't have any reaction while dildoing themselves. There could be more content with more variety. I registered twice to this site but there are better ones out there.

This site has a lot of potential but falls short. If you like the type of models they have, older sexy women, then the content is great. Many of those sexy seniors love to take cock. They perform hardcore sex inluding anal, facial, and creampies. The women looks great and are paired up with a younger man. The video quality is good. They are available in dvd quality 6630X380 in wmv and mp4 format. You can also rate the scenes and leave comment on them. There are some nice picture sets available for each scene and model too.

The really bad part about this site is the lack of downloadable content. They only offer the most recent two months to download the scenes. All the other past scenes are available but for streaming only. The other bad part is they only update twice a month so that leaves you with a total of four or five scenes to download from the start. There reason behind this is to stop online piracy of there scenes they stated. The problem with that is the site is run by the Score group and they have other grat sites that don't have this limitation on downloads.

In short with the lack of updates and downloads this site is not very good. You do get access to 60 plus milfs, which is basically the same but with slightly older women. If they updated at least twice a week on both sites and allowed all the content to be downloaded it would be a great site but until then its really not worth it.

+ Nice looking mature women
+ Latest videos in HD (1280x720p) in wmv., most of them are approx. 10 - 15 minutes long and look nice and crisp.
+ Fair download speed. My normal speed with most sites is at my maximum of 2.3 MB/s while this site gave me 1.2 MB/s. Not too shabby, though and since most files are around 300 - 400 KB it's not really an issue. However, be aware that this was done with Firefox' DownThemAll, while with Firefox' native downloader the speed was more like 250 KB/s.

Cons:

- The most "bare minimum" member's page I have ever seen.
- Only updates once every two weeks.
- A total of 90 videos ONLY starting in 2008.
- Huge Watermarks in videos in lower right and upper left of videos! Very distracting and unnecessary.
- Allows only one download at a time.
- No streaming.
- No pictures.
- No search engine.
- No information on videos.
- No model list.

Bottom Line:

First let me say that the ugly grandma on their tour page does not represent the majority of the mature women, most of whom are actually quite good looking if you like them a tad older than thirty-five.

Having said that, that's almost the only really positive thing I can say about the site.

The member's page is a joke with four small thumbnails of the latest updates shown plus a section below containing page numbers, if you click on those you are taken to another page featuring another 4 small thumbnails, there's no description of the scenes themselves, simply the names of the actors and that's it ... really, really bare bones navigation.

The earlier videos (and you don't have to go back very far) are in 640x480p avi format at a 2000 bitrate. Actually, in all fairness, they don't look too bad, but could be better.

The videos themselves are typically Ferro and lack heat. They are well lighted and filmed but something is missing. The samples I have watched seemed too posed for my liking.

Upon subscribing you are being given an impossible user name and password. I copied and pasted one and wrote down the other just to get into the site where I was promptly informed that I would need further authorization before I could proceed with downloads. So back to G-Mail to click on the authorization link and I was finally a member in good standing.

One bonus site of your choice (from the Ferro network) can be added at this time, but you are once again asked for your user name and password. If you get a site that also contains picture sets (zipped) you have to sign in to that one separately as well. Awkward to say the least.

In order to encourage you to continue to subscribe you are being given an extra bonus site for every week you are a member.

Stunning matures would get no more than 70 from me*** if it weren't for the extra sites that are being added at the time of subscription and in the weeks to follow.

As I can tell by my first bonus, not all Ferro sites are as poorly set up as this one. That's a relief because this site would never survive on its own.

*** This may look a bit confused but I gave the site originally a seventy-five but reduced it to seventy because of their super-sized water marks. This major change was explained in the bar heading the review but then was wiped out by further small corrections I made to the review.

- She's very hot and a great hot-wife
- Great attitude and personality

Cons:

- Site is just crap. Navigation is bad and just Looks very cheesy.
- Thought I was joining a site, and it looks more like some kind of social networking/forum crap. Not interested in seeing uploaded photo's from some other members fat ugly cow wife..
- Video's are ok but not particularly compelling.
- Photo's are just screen sgrabs

Bottom Line:

I wish this site was better. I have been thinking of joining for a couple of years and was immediately disappointed.

Didn't know it was a members oriented site with lots of junk and posts from other members uploaded. Mostly fat unattractive women.

What I wanted was video/photos of a great hotiwfe brandi... what I got was disappointing...

A lot of content on this network which covers most niches (solo, lesbian, hardcore...).
Good video and picture quality for recent content.
Daily updates.
Good download speed from Europe.

Cons:

Almost no more hardcore content featuring boy/girl action.
Higher subscription cost than most mature oriented sites.

Bottom Line:

This network used to be one of the best mature oriented network about 1 or 2 years ago. But since that they only update their sites with solo or lesbian content, they do not deserve this title anymore for all the people that enjoyed their boy/girl movies and photo sets.

So according to me it's quite simple. If you rather like solo or lesbian content with really mature ladies, then it'll be the perfect network for you. but if you re not interested by such content, then you ll have to look elswhere. You ll still have the old hardcore content available and about 1 harcore scene per week from old German/Deutsch movies but that's all.

+All exclusif content that is dated.
+They update about once a week.
+There are 48 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and resolution is 720x480 1500kbps.
+They have 53 photosets and they can be dowloaded as complete zip files. The resolution varies from set to set but the lowest I found was 893x1344.
+Unlike most of the other models in the nework. Her content is less extreme.
+You can access videos from the photos section and vice-versa photos from the video section.
+You get access to 8 other sites.

Cons:

-The site is less than a year old so not that much content yet. Unless one or more of the other sites interest you than you might be a little disapointed.
-The majority of the pic sets are taken from the video shoot so not alot of variety.
-Site lacks the personality that a solo model should have.
-Although less extreme than most other models. Her content may still be a little more extreme than certain people enjoy.
-No search options available.
-Limited to 2 download at a time.

Bottom Line:

*Mrs sirens is a beautiful blond woman in her 30's with an all natural body and some pretty impressive breast. She seems to really like having sex and she's into some pretty intense vaginal and anal penetration. She loves to have more than one patner at the same time and she's willing to offer them all her openings so that there's no waiting.

*She only has one lesbian video but I'd say that she really enjoys women so I hope she'll do more in the future. I didn't find much to complain about except that it would be nice to see more interaction between Mrs Sirens and her members. As it is. All you get are her photosets and videos. The one thing that I enjoyed was that her husband isn't often in the videos and that was a plus for me because he's very tattooed.

*Some may complain that you can't download more than 2 videos at a time but they only take a couple of minutes to download so that wasn't an issue for me.

+content is mostly all exclusif.
+There are 299 videos and they can all be downloaded in WMV.
+There are over 400 phototsets and they can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+You get access to 25 other sites.
+Content is all dated they are still be updating.

Cons:

-There are only about 80 videos at 640x480. The bulk are only 320x240.
-Many of the newer videos are actually only part a complete scene and even some of those videos are split into 2 or more clips.
-I found that the cameran does a poor job on many of the videos and you often don't see the action from the right angles.
-The resolution for pics varies from set to set but anything prior to 2009 isn't worth downloading and I have seen some after 2009 that are only at 800x533.
-The large majority of photosets are taken from the video shoot so not very much variety.
-There is no search option. All you have is a choice between the year and whether it's a photoset or video.
-Site is pretty slow to surf because it takes about 4 seconds from the moment you press the icon to the moment somethin happens.

Bottom Line:

*Tracy has been doing this since 1999 and she doesn't seem to be slowing down. She's a pretty attractyive blond woman in her 40's or maybe even in her early 50's with a very active sex life. She has a few lesbian videos but I never got the feeling that she's really into women. On the other hand she is definetely into men, and the age, number or race of these gentlemen is not important.

**The first major problem is that the bulk of the videos aren't worth looking at or saving because they are onlt at 320x240 and that's such a low resolution. The photoset seem to fair ven worse because most of them are from the video shoots and resolution is way below HD.

**I have a personal problem with the site in regards to anal. There is no anal to be found anywhere except if it's from other performers. She took a small toy in the very beginning but nothing since then. I was hoping that she would have at some point done some but I didn't see any on the site.

-It's difficult to give the site a good score because the content could be good but since you can't really see the bulk of it due to poor quality then all you are left with is stuff done in the last 3 years and that's not enough for me.

-You get access to 12 sites with your membership.
-A couple of the performers aren't bad looking.
-Navigation is the same for all sites so that makes it easier to find your way.
-There are many video clips to download.
-They use CCbill so easy to cancel.

Cons:

-Just about everything from these sites is a Con. I'm going the list the bigger ones.
1-There are many videos to download but almost all of them are tiny clips of a larger scene.
2-The same videos appears in more than one site.
3-Resolution is a crappy 320x240. I could give you bit rate but who cares with that resolution.
4-Regardless of what is stated about updates. These sites stopped updating 2008.
5-The clips are tiny but what you can see of the action leaves a lot to be desired.
6-There are photosets but since you have to downlaod them pic by pic and resolution is just as bad as the videos.

Bottom Line:

-The only good thing about these sites is that they use CCbill and I got access for 20$ instead of 30$.

***Please stay far away from these sites and I'd even add that if any of these performers are on any other sites then also stay away from those because it's going to be a waste your money. I can vouch for that because two of the sites on this network contain an older lady named Valerie and I got screwed by joining another network with her in it and it was worse than this one.***

-Claudia Marie is a super hot 37 yrs old woman with huge breast who loves to have hardcore sex on film.
-All the content is exclusif and most of the videos have a little scenario.
-There are currently 135 videos which can be downloaded or viewd online. The average run time is 20 minutes and more.
-You get access to 17 other sites.
-All content is dated.
-They are still updating with more videos.
-They have a nice interface for searching different types of fetish or sex act.
-

Cons:

-The biggest con has to be Claudia-marie because if you don't like her looks than you certainly won't enjoy any of the videos. She's an above 30 years old woman with huge (now fake) breast who's a little on the chubby side.
-Resolution for downloaded videos is only 368x272.
-The sites offers high resolution photos which are usually 1024x768 or 1152x768 but you can't download them as a single zip file.

Bottom Line:

-Claudia Marie is not the type of model that I'm normally attracted to. I'm not a fan of huge breast whether real or fake but Claudia-marie is such an amazing sex performer that I overlooked that aspect and found myself enjoying her videos.

-Her looks is about the only thing that might be an issue for some people. It's for sure that if you prefer younger models with petite figures than you'll never enjoy the site.

-If you like Claudia-marie's looks and enjoy seeing a woman that craves IR, anal and the more intense B/G sex than you'll really enkjoy this site. Anyone interested in teen sites should stay away.

-The only key improvement would be if they could remaster their videos into a higher resolution.

**Please join site through Celeste Fox since her join price is only 24.96$ instead of 29.99$ for Claudia-Marie's site.**

-The content is all exclusif.
-Most of the models appear to be true unknows so that adds a little to the sites premise.
-They have a good selection of models.
-They have 73 videos and they are at a decent 720x480 resolution.
-You get acccess to 31 other sites.

Cons:

-They don't update very often. They have only added 10 videos since mbaya's June 2009 review.
-A large amount of the content on the other sites is leased material and most of it is of poor quality and pretty old.
-The models on this site also appear on a couple of the other sites and they perform similar sex acts so might not be worth downloading.
-The content isn't really dated. It's possible to find the info but it's time consuming research through the update pages.
-They have photos at a 1024x768 resolution but these can only be downloaded individually.

Bottom Line:

-This is a decent site with some pretty well shot sex scenes. The premise is that men are sending their wives/girlfriends to Dirty D to be trained in the fine art of satisfying them. The sex is on the raunchy side with a blowbangs in most of them and anal in over a dozen videos.

-There is a lot of material to be found on some of the other sites and most of it is of similar quality as this one.

-My score is in part because you get access to many other sites and I also enjoyed the content on those sites.

**I was able to get access to the network for half the price by visiting skunk riley's site and trying to leave it. There is apop up that appears and offers you a discount. I just wish they would forgo these gimmicks and simply offer it upfront but I won't refuse the discount.**

-Alanna is a rather cute 30+ yrs old blond woman with a penchant for swinging.
-There are more than 200 videos.
There are over 400 photosets and they can all be downloaded as a complete zip file. The resolution varies a lot from set to set so it's difficult. I can confirm that many of them are at least 1152x864.
-You get access to the TAC amateur and chickpass networks.

Cons:

-Their updates are dated but those dates are not worth anything since the content found on it is often much older than the date posted. I found videos from 2007 that are dated 2011.
-Their navigation system is a little confusing. You can search for videos and photosets by different categories but if that scene includes interacial, anal, and a cumshot than it's going to be located in all of these locations. Members have to be carefull not to download the same content multiple times.
-Too many of the videos are broken into 2 or more parts and they aren't huge files.
-They claim that some of their videos have dvd quality but that false. They barely qualify for moderate qulaity. I found that many videos had below average quality.
-Some of their content are scenes from swinging parties that star other internet performers so its also available on their site as well as Alanna's.

Bottom Line:

-Maybe my expectation are too high for these types of sites. I mean this is suppose to be an amateur site but then again can you really call yourself an amateur if you've been doing this for more than 5 years. I think that Alanna is a cute above 30 woman with a nice body that suits her age. If only the content on this site was as good as her than she would have something special.

-I found far too many videos that were filmed using a lower quality video camera and poor lighting so that most of the videos cannot be watched full screen and often the action is difficult to make out. Then you add a less than stellar camera guy and you get a video that's blurry, semi-dark, bad camera angles and the always pleasant swinging camera because we don't want to edit that from the video.

-I downloaded about half a dozen videos but I'll only keep about 2 of those. The rest aren't worth the hard disk space.

**The only reason I gave the site a higher score than my review seems to imply it deserves is in large part because of the bonus content and the join price is less than 20$.**

-Over 500 models.
-Over 280 hardcore videos.
-Over 1000 softcore videos.
-Nearly 2300 photosets.
-They have a good search system that allows searches by age, body type, fetish and so forth.
-They update with new content daily and all of it is dated.

Cons:

-This may only be me but I find that many of the models don't fall under my understanding of the term older. I guess they are older than models on their other site but not by that many years.
-This is primarily a photoset site with most of that content being softcore.
-Only about half of the movies are in one file.

Bottom Line:

-This is another site that has disapointed me because it doesn't really have what I'm looking for in older content. I was hoping for a lot more hardcore videos but that doesn't seem to be karups way. It has the same qualities found on karups PC but not anywhere near the same amount of content. I guess that's normal since porn is often a young girls job.

-I'm not really sure who will really enjoy most of the content found on this site. I guess if you like women over the age of 30 and prefer softcore photosets than you should get your moneys worth. It probably isn't worth staying a long term member.

-It should be avoided by anyone wanting hardcore videos with older women. You're likely to be disatisified with this site.

-My score is based on what the site offers and not what I found to my liking. I in fact did not find one video that I want to keep.

-They have nearly 530 models to choose from.
-They have over 2150 videos.
-They have over 5900 phtosets.
-Movies can be streamed online with flash player
-All the videos can be downloaded as a complete file in either WMV or MPG. They also have some videos.
-All photosets can be downloaded as a complete file. They all offer pics 1024 and 1536 format and some of the newer ones also come in 2400.
-They have an active forum for their members.
-They have a calender showing the updates for the next 7 days.
-Update are a mixture of 5 photosets/videos.
-Content is all dated.

Cons:

-The majority of photosets and videos are mostly softcore to midore so very little hardcore to choose from.
-There are nearly 3 times more photosets than videos.
-The majority of models are 41 or less so you might want to look elsewhere if you were looking for older ladies.
-They don't update with the models photoset and corresponding video at the same time.

Bottom Line:

-This is an impressive site with a large library of content but I can't help but feel disapointed that there is so little hardcore to be found inside and also that there are so few videos. I may have gottent my hopes up thinking that there would be much more than there really is.

-The site should update with a photoset and the video that goes with it instead of doing it over a certain period of time.

-This is a hard site to recommend because I'm not sure exactly who they are trying to cater to. It's a mature site but since most of the models are in their 30's then that might not be what some of us consider very mature. There is hardcore but again not that much so that might not be enough to satisfy those people. There weren't too many glamour videos or photosets so again that cuts another group. I guess if you want to see women from the age of 30 to 41 do solo shoots and some fetich and hardscore then this might be the site for you. I suspect most others will be a disapointed like me.

06-09-1108:06pm (Update History)Reason: The longer I am in this site the more I notice its flaws. See update below:

Pros:

Surprising amount of pictures and videos for a Solo Model Site

I counted approx. 150 picture sets (1024 px), 110+ movies (720x576), anywhere between 20 and forty minutes long judging by the samples I downloaded. There are over 100 shorter clips for download as well.

Vidcaps

Short sex stories containing pictures of model.

Model is a happy amateur exhibitionist (the site is run by her and her husband) and it shows.

Mostly softcore. Hardcore content is mainly role playing between husband and wife.

2 Bonus sites: Daniella Lycra Ass and Daniella in Pantyhose, great for lovers of either or both.

Cons:

No streaming, but because the videos are also offered in very short 1 minute clips with pictures for those with slower speed one can get a good idea what the video contains. Still I miss being able to preview a video.

Large and very obvious watermarks.

Pictures are not offered in zipped form.

No search engine.

Bottom Line:

The site is run by a Lady called Daniella English and her husband and it should be everything I hate: no zips for the pictures, large water marks, no streaming, no HD videos.

If I saw this mentioned in anyone else's review I would say, no thanks, yet there is something very appealing to this site and I confess that, despite the above mentioned shortcomings, I like it. Probably because it is not run by professionals which is a welcome switch.

Daniella has an incredible posterior - and be warned that in most videos and picture sets the emphasis is on showing off this large booty. She also has lovely big natural breasts and nipples and you truly get the feeling that she really enjoys showing off both. Those who expect a glamor model will not like this site but those who enjoy an ordinary housewife doing "rude" things for our sexual gratification will be glad they joined.

Because of the above mentioned cons I could not in clear conscience give the site a higher score but I like it nevertheless.

Update 09/06/2011: I was willing to overlook quite a few of the flaws of this site because I was so thrilled to run into a real amateur for a change but the longer I am with it the more I discover its flaws.

Many videos are too formulaic concentrating mostly on the butt of the model while there are very few prolonged frontal shots, or even shots of the English Milf's face.

Updates may be regular but are turning out to be too infrequent for my taste. Some updates (today's) could hardly be called an update at all because it consists of a very inferior series of small vidcaps.

And so, regrettably there's less to this site than I first hoped for and I am reducing my original score accordingly.

Lots of content to see with a variety of different options for different tastes. There are a number of 'bonus sites' that seem to be from the same company under different names. Because of the bonus sites and being the same company some of the same scenes will be found on other sites which is nice because of what will be listed in the con.

Cons:

As noted above it seems to be one big company with different 'bonus sites'. But each site is a little bit different and when viewing the pictures some sites are extremely annoying while others are quite nice. For example, on Hot60plus, it only shows 8 pictures at a time and the pictures are essentially video frames so it takes forever to get through. But on other sites it is a page with 60+ pictures (still video frames) allowing for much better viewing. Also, I had difficulty with the flash player working properly, but that may have been on my end and not theirs so take that con with a grain of salt.

Bottom Line:

I would recommend the site with some reservations. Make sure you understand what you're getting into. I agree with this websites review of hot60, that you can get through most of the content you will be interested in in a month, 2 at most.

-Decent selection of natural and enhanced models to choose from.
-Photosets can be dowloaded in 800 x 600 and 1600 x 1200 resolution.
-They are still updating.
-Content is dated.
-You can search by models name, body type hair color and type of shoot.

Cons:

-The bulk of the videos are streaming only.
-They only have 270 videos.
-They only have 150 photosets.
-They only have 13 magazines.
-There is a large logo on each pic.
-Their preview pages are serioulsy misleading.
-Their pages are clutered with offers from other sites.

Bottom Line:

-There must have been some serious changes at 40something since January of this year because TBP gave this site an 82 and claimed that videos were downloadable. In my book 10 downloadable videos out of 270 is not enough to claim that the site allows downloads.

-This is one of the worst case of half truth and lies that I've seen a site do in many years. I joined based on the TBP review and the sites own preview pages. First lie. They claim that you can get access to every 40something magazine ever printed. Yes, you do but you will have to buy them so not free. Second lie: They mention all the videos and pic sets that the model has and they do say x number of videos from other sites but if they aren't availbale on your site then why bring them up. The only conclusion I see is that they know that people like me will assume that these videos are available on their site but content can be also be found on those other sites.

This site belongs to the score group which owns a huge amount of other sites but because of this site I don't think I will ever join any of their otrher sites for fear that they are lying on that site as well.

***This site is to be avoided at all cost or you will regret wasting your 20$ like I am at this very moment.***

- 2 simultaneous downloads max. Can't surf when downloading 2 files
- Some MILFs are a bit young. MILF only by definition.
- A lot of the girls have some silicon
- Not a wide range of ethnicities. Mostly white chicks

Bottom Line:

My biggest complaint is that the MILFs are only MILF by definition. "I'm 23 with a kid" kind of MILFs. Some are reaching their 40s, but most are just about or just under 30. About 33% of the women have silicon breasts, which does give them an older look.

Some of the plots are interesting, some are funny, other times they just talk then fuck.

At least one update a week, and they never remove old content. So count on seeming lots of previous content.

Users have the choice of downloading screens (taken about every 20-40seconds), typical quality movie, high quality movie, or a mobile version. Also users can stream in either low, medium, or high quality.

All in all 85 as a stand alone site because alone it doesn't pack lots of content, and the less than 50 videos can be quickly gone through the first week or so of your subscription. Once you factor in the other content BangBros has to offer this site is pushed up to a 91. The other content helps thing mix quite well.

01-28-1111:08am (Update History)Reason: Original score restored. See remarks below and also under comments.

Pros:

A huge archive of mature, attractive models.

Picture sets: Older sets display at 1024x680 px, not bad if they are all like the sample set, dated 2005, that I test-downloaded. Newer sets are at 1500x1001px.

Latest videos are in HD at 1280x720, total bitrate close to 4000 kbps. Nice! I could not quite determine when either pictures or videos changed to a higher resolution but it cannot have been too long ago because even early 2010 videos are in 640x480 at 2000 kbps. However it must be stressed that they, as well, are of good quality and quite crisp if one does not insist on watching them full screen.

Excellent search engine.

Excellent basic home page lay out, even though it looks a bit dated, but it makes it very easy to find one's way around.

Cons:

Bonus pictures and feeds: Bonus picture sets are from AllOver30 and Anilos. It would be nice if they could be downloaded zipped and in their best resolution. Many of us simply don't feel like downloading a set, one picture at a time.

The bonus "feeds" are even more disappointing because they consist of 1 minute clips of various DVDs only, and are further ruined by a logo running across the picture. Karups would do better not to offer bonuses that aren't really bonuses.

However, in all fairness, one of the bonuses, KarupsPC Content, is a nice little gift because the picture sets are zipped and the quality itself is fine even though they date back to 2005.

Search engine, as much as I like it, should have the additional function of filtering HD content and High Res Picture sets. Many users are no longer content with less than HD quality and don't like to sift through all the updates and models to find what they want.

Too many enhanced breasts.

Cons continued below:

Bottom Line:

The term older does not really fit because most models would be called MILFS or Cougars or Mature in other places. There is only a handful of models over 50 and only one over 60.

Bottom Line:

A nice, solid, quality site for lovers of mature women. So far it does not live up to my personal expectations because my preferred niche is erotic lingerie, while most models that are found under "Lingerie" or "Panties" in their advanced search appear to wear daily ho-hum "underwear" that is practical rather than arousing.

Experience has taught me that my taste is not necessarily the generally accepted one so I won't hold this against the site.

I have also found a few videos and picture sets that do come a bit closer to what I want in the short time I have been with this site, so who knows, maybe between the updates and the site's vast store of material I'll be able to dig out a few more erotic nuggets during my month of membership.

Edited Jan. 28, 2011

I received a notice yesterday informing me that my subscription had expired despite the fact that I have still three weeks to go. Access was cut off immediately and two emails to support to correct the situation brought no response. It is impossible to get in touch with their Billing Company because the only link provided is that of KarupsOW support. Because support, when needed, plays such an important part I have downgraded my review by five points.

Edit: Score restored to its original because I got a response to my 3rd email informing me of a glitch in their system and their efforts to correct it. Additional days have been promised for every day lost now.

- A lot of material
- Daily movie and gallery updates
- Reasonably good navigation options
- Most models in 30s & early 40s, which works for me
- Good movie quality; streaming, download options and screen caps
- Some good/protracted strips from casual and business attire
- Would prefer a camerawoman rather than man for the interview/chat movies

Cons:

- Age of models (some under 30) may stretch 'OW' for some
- Slightly retro design (although front end has been updated; am sure member area will follow)
- Very typical lighting/sets/premise for all scenes
- Many models a little too enhanced for my taste, and relatively few unshaved
- Very little girl-girl content
- Could use a few more navigation options
- Older movies are lower quality and split into parts.
- Some daft fake uniforms and hackneyed outfits (newer sets are redressing this, thankfully)

Bottom Line:

Looking for girls up to around my own age (40), it was a choice between this, Anilos and All over 30. They all look similar and suspect they offer similar content; the quality of samples I found on TGPs just tipped the scales in favour of Karups OW. (Interestingly, they include bonus content from, and link some models to, the other two sites.)

There is a lot of material here, it's a bit daunting at first! On top of that, they add a new movie AND a new photo set 6 days a week, so it is growing at a good rate. Navigation is fine; 4 categories of pictures and two of movies - although with the amount of material, we could use more, and/or the ability to sort each list by model name or date added.

Most of the material is soft, with maybe a quarter hardcore; the latter isn't really my thing, but actually the scenes are relatively well-positioned and I enjoyed them. Of the softcore, it's probably about 50/50 between toys and fingers; and there are some good strips and teases before getting to that point. Only a handful of girl-girl shoots and movies; I'd like to see more.

Movies are good quality, sharp and well-lit (even if slightly saturated) - 720p and each page shows a few download options and screen caps of the action, which is useful. This format goes back about a year and a half (a bit less for the screen caps); before that, the movies are mostly SD and many are only available in parts. Image quality is OK; available in 1024px and 1500px which is just about acceptable; I'd prefer 2000px.

I was quite disappointed that so many of the models have fake:
- boobs (I'm no expert but could spot these a mile away)
- tans (and the lighting makes them look even more orange)
- smiles (only the minority of models show their personality and a range of expressions)

Natural is always better in my book, but it seems this is endemic in the milf genre. Similarly, I like a mixture of pubic hair arrangements; shaved, trimmed or natural - although I do prefer the latter and there are very few unshaved girls here. Am hoping it tells them something that the hairiest girl I found is their 4th top model! (Am planning to join We Are Hairy at some point to redress the balance.) OTOH, it's a little churlish to complain, given the quantity of material here.

Overall, nothing groundbreaking here but a good site nonetheless. Although I'm only staying one month, I've definitely got my $30 worth; I will likely join again sometime, but will probably try the other two sites beforehand.

... let me start with the biggest con. Pictures should be their strength. That's what the magazine is all about however they manage to ruin every single set (latest ones zipped and around 1600px) with an oversized, intrusive, aggravating watermark that's been placed in the wrong spot. So for many collectors pictures are out.

As to the videos, they are woeful, with the newest ones in 640x360 wmv format with a total bitrate between 1500 and 2500. Older ones are even tinier in 320x240 mpg format. I had to get my info re. the latter by taking a peak at TBPs review because, as the previous reviewer stated, my browser crashed every time I attempted to download an older video.

Homepage is hopelessly cluttered with sales offers and other extraneous material. Preview pictures of recent updates are ridiculously tiny.

Way too much hardcore material. This might be a plus for some but with the material coming from a magazine this disappointed me, personally.

Bottom Line:

I didn't check my personal statistics but this must be the lowest rating I've ever given anyone.

I see no redeeming value in this site because between picture sets that are being ruined by the watermark, and videos that are only available in yesterday's outdated quality, plus the browser crashes, as well as the crass and obvious attempts to make some extra sales to their members there's absolutely nothing for me here.

I had always had my quarrels with these folks about the watermarks (see my previous comments) but was tempted to subscribe because sister sites 50plus MILF and 60plus MILF finally gave me some lingerie I liked and I was hoping for the same here, at least in the videos.

I found several of my favorite models on this site and thought maybe this site has sets of them I don't have and so I decided to sign up.

Yes, it’s a website on the Internet that features “Older” Women – the specifics are not really shown on the “Not a member! Come on and see our goods for sale” intro pages.. until I became a member.

Pros: Yes it has mature women, it has many of them, various physical attributes and so forth.

Videos are in WMV and MPEG formats (A Major Plus, this site is download manager friendly - becoming a norm) my settings are 1 video at a time. The newer vids are HD WMV, but if you want to make a DVD collection, the MPEG is easier to work with. HD-WMV is becoming a website Standard now. No DRM.

Zip files are good,on top of the page, there is the resolution, its all packed up and ready to download. Great but again, a "all-in-one" zip file link is becoming a website Standard.

Website layout is fairly easy to use. I can click and navigate around easy.

Cons:

I just want to say one thing to the camera-man “Dude! STFU!”

[Camera-woman's voice is okay, no prob there]

Comparing this site to other sites, the other sites typically film the action and that’s that. On this site, basically the some of the videos begin with the cameraman’s dorky voiced commentary and continues throughout the whole video. Gawd man, STFU already. Amatuer, not the content but the people who work this site.

Interviewing and doing some sort of “get to know your” naked lady video is okay now and then, but come on, there’s is a lot of them. Obviously, a porn site is suppose to be that, a porn site with action and if its not part some lonely housewife and mailman theme, then forget it, if I wanted to listen to some sort of psychological profile, interpersonal communication skills and emotional constructs relating to sex, I’d go to an AA meeting. Geesh. I mean seriously.

Less talk more action.

Bottom Line:

Good video downloads (the newer vids are more like 320p), Yep, a good sized HD logo stamped on the vids gives me assurance that the vid is shot in alleged "HD" ... good zip file downloads and its download manager friendly (remember I download 1 video at a time), it’s great.
But these things are becoming porn site standards.
It is how the content is being handled, photos that seem to be shot by a man with unsteady hands and a cameraman that will not be quiet, themes that include rubber-cowhide-leather-wetsuit crap that’s supposed to be kinky. But there are some regular “porn” vidoes and photos worth downloading, its hit and miss.

I did find different photo/video sets of the models, I was interested in, that is a plus but other than that, if these models weren’t on this site, I would’ve passed.. Knowing what I know now.

Rebilling, Make sure you cancel or use a temporary prepaid credit card or "Craziescash" will continue to try rebill you.
You'll see your statement "transaction declined. transaction declined. transaction declined. transaction declined. "ahh, two weeks later" transaction approved!" So then, its like Great, I just paid for another month for videos about the camera man that talks and interupts, gives advice to naked people. Woo Hoo, just what I wanted for a Christmas porno present.

Only one download at a time when using DTA through Firefox. Much slower speed when using regular Browser downloader.

Still a relatively small site with 49 models.

Videos and Picture sets only update once a week, which might not be a bad thing since attractive 50+ models are few and far between and the chance is always there that the quality gets watered down.

Navigation is simple but nevertheless takes a bit of getting used to.

Bottom Line:

I love this site and it would have rated well in the nineties if it hadn't been for those accursed big watermarks and the fact that it is still a relatively small site.

The quality of the videos and pictures is excellent. The ladies are confident and at ease with their bodies and sexuality and appear to be having fun at the shoots. I especially enjoy the interviews because it makes the scenes the models appear in later on more "intimate" for some reason.

I would highly recommend this site, for a month, to lovers of truly older women.

Protecting MinorsWe are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.