Abstract

Background

Up to date, most of previous studies about Chinese prehypertension were conducted based on a small sample or in only one province, which could not represent the general population in China. Furthermore, no information on the ethnic difference in prevalence of prehypertension has been reported in China. The aim of this study is to examine the sex-specific, age-specific and ethnic-specific prevalence of prehypertension and associated risk factors in a large-scale multi-ethnic Chinese adult population.

Methods

The subjects came from a large-scale population survey about Chinese physiological constants and health conditions conducted in six provinces. 47, 495 adults completed blood pressure measurement. Prehypertension was defined as not being on antihypertensive medications and having SBP of 120–139 mmHg and/or DBP of 80–89 mmHg. Odds ratio (OR) and its 95 % confidence interval (CI) from logistic models were used to reflect the prevalence of prehypertension.

Conclusion

High prevalence rate of prehypertension was general in Chinese adults. Many sociodemographic characteristics were significantly associated with prehypertension. There were important clinical significance and public health significance about age-specific, gender-specific and ethnic-specific Chinese prehypertension conditions studies.

Keywords

PrehypertensionChinaAdultRisk factorEthnicity

Background

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and cerebrovascular diseases have gradually become the leading cause of mortality in both developed and developing countries over the last several decades. CVD has become the No. 1 cause of death 10 years ago in China [1]. Although CVD and cerebrovascular diseases were caused by many risk factors, hypertension has been identified as the major one leading to myocardial infarction, stroke, renal dysfunction and heart failure [2, 3]. In general, the trend of hypertension prevalence has been increasing in many countries. It was reported that hypertension affected 26.4 % of the world’s adult population (972 million) in 2000, and the rates were expected to increase to 29.2 % (1.56 billion) by 2025 [4]. China has the most condensed population in the world and has also been transitioning economically. As a major public health problem, hypertension is threatening more and more Chinese people too. In China, hypertension has become a dominant chronic disease and appropriately 160 million Chinese or 18.8 % were suffering from hypertension according to the recent report from the Chinese National Nutrition and Health Survey [5].

The Eighth Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-8) continued to recommend and emphasize lifestyle changing in prevention of hypertension [6, 7]. In 2014, JNC-8 introduced a new category of prehypertension which is defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) from 120 to 139 mmHg, and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from 80–89 mmHg in order to improve blood pressure control [6, 7]. After the release of this new blood pressure category, numerous studies have been focusing on this topic. Research on prehypertension prevalence and its associated risk factors is of great interest worldwide [8, 9]. More than 30 % of adults were reported suffering from prehypertension in the United States [10]. It was estimated that prehypertension progresses to clinical hypertension at a rate of 19 % over 4 years [11]. According to the Framingham Heart Study, people with prehypertension are 3.5 times more likely to develop heat attacks than those with normal blood pressure [12].

However, little is known about the current situation of the prevalence of prehypertension in China. Most of previous estimates on the prevalence of prehypertension in china were only based on only one province of China or a small sample size, which could not represent the general Chinese population [13–16]. Furthermore, China is a multi-ethnic country, up to date no information on the ethnic difference in prevalence of prehypertension has been reported in China. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time to report the prevalence of prehypertension and its associated risk factors among Chinese adult population using nationally representative sample covering dozens of minorities. Specifically, the aim of this study is to examine the sex-specific, age-specific and ethnic-specific prevalence of hypertension and prehypertension and associated risk factors in a large-scale multi-ethnic Chinese adult population.

Methods

Sample and participants

This study is based on data from a large-scale population survey in a representative sample of general Chinese population from 2007 to 2011. The main purpose of that survey is to examine Chinese physiological constants and health conditions. It was supported by the basic performance key project by the ministry of science and technology of the People’s Republic of China, and has been approved by the review board of Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences annually. In brief, this survey was carried out in six provinces of China, which was selected according to the population size of the minorities, including Sichuan province, Heilongjiang province, Hunan province, Inner Mongolia autonomous region, Yunnan province and Ningxia Hui autonomous region. Three-stage cluster sampling method was used to select eligible subjects in each province. First, two or three cities were sampled according to their economical status and ethnic inhabitations of minorities. Then five or six communities and villages were randomly selected in each city. Among eligible people, we excluded participants suffering from severe chronic diseases and those with a high fever in the past 15 days. All included participants gave their informed consent to participant in the study. The procedure of this study involves physical examination including blood pressure measurement and face-to-face questionnaire interviews. Finally, out of 52, 265 included subjects, 47, 495 (90.9 %) subjects have complete data on all survey scales and blood pressure measure.

Blood pressure measurement

Blood pressure was measured by trained physicians following standard guidelines, which involved American national high blood pressure education program and Chinese guidelines for hypertension prevention and treatment [17, 18]. Subjects were asked to avoid drinking coffee, tea or eating other stimulant food and drugs before the measurement. Blood pressure was measured at morning after subjects having rested for five minutes in the seating position with her or his back supported, feet on the floor and right arm supported with cubit fossa at heart level. The appropriate cuff was chosen based on their arm circumference. Blood pressure was measured based on one clinical visit.

Average values of two readings separated by 5 min were used in the analysis. The classification of normotensive (NT), prehypertensive (PRT) and hypertensive (HT) was based on the criteria from JNC-8 [6, 7]. Subjects were defined as being hypertensive if they had an average SBP equal to or greater than 140 mmHg, and/or average DBP equal to or greater than 90 mmHg, and/or were diagnosed as being hypertensive in the past, and/or reported current treatment with antihypertensive medications. Prehypertension was defined as not being on antihypertensive medications and having SBP of 120–139 mmHg and /or DBP of 80–89 mmHg. Normal blood pressure was defined as not being on antihypertensive medications and having SBP <120 mmHg and DBP <80 mmHg.

Sociodemographic variables

Sociocharacteristics included age, gender, marital status, educational level, occupation, ethnicity, smoking, alcohol drinking, high-salt diet condition, body mass index (BMI), abdominal obesity and family history of cardiovascular diseases. Age was categorized into 6 groups: 18–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and 70–79 years old. Marital status included married, single, divorced and widowed. Educational level was categorized into three groups: illiterate or primary school, high school and university. Occupation referred to physical laborer or laborer with mental work. With broad range of ethnicity, subjects were grouped as Han, Yi, Miao, Mongolia, Tibetan, Hui, Tujia, Korean, Manchu, Yao, Dai, Qiang and all others. Smoking was categorized into never smokers, current smokers and former smokers. Alcohol drinking was categorized into regular drinkers and non-drinkers. Subjects were also categorized as liking high-salt diet or not. BMI was defined as weight (kg) divided by squared height (m2). Weight and height were measured to the nearest 0.1 kg or 0.1 cm with the subjects wearing light undergarments and no shoes according to standard procedure [19, 20]. According to Chinese guidelines for prevention and control of adult overweight and obesity and the Chinese criteria by Working Group on Obesity in China [19, 20], general obesity is defined as BMI equal to or greater than 28 kg/m2; overweight was defined as BMI less than 28 kg/m2 and equal to or greater than 24 kg/m2. Waist circumference (WC) was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm while subjects were in the standing position. According to the Chinese criteria by Working Group on Obesity in China [20], abdominal obesity is defined as WC equal to or greater than 85 cm for males and 80 cm for females. Finally, in order to account for the genetic variation, subjects were categorized into having family history of cardiovascular diseases or not. The subject was defined having family history of cardiovascular diseases if his/her father or/and mother have been diagnosed suffering from cardiovascular diseases.

Statistical analysis

Database was constructed with EPI3.02 software by two data managers respectively and was corrected to guarantee the accuracy and integration of the data. Continuous variables were described with mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were described with number and percentage. The mean age was compared with analysis of variance. Blood pressure conditions were compared with Wilcoxon rank sum test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and its 95 % confidence interval (CI) for prehypertension. Variables with P < 0.05 in univariate analyses were included in the multivariate logistic model. All statistical analysis was conducted in SAS9.2 software (SAS institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA). Two sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of all subjects, 16,211 individuals had normal blood pressure, 17,281 individuals were prehypertensive and 14,003 were hypertensive. The prevalence rates of HT and PRT were 29.5 and 36.4 % respectively. The mean age for NT subjects was 35.3 ± 14.5 years old, which seems younger than those with HT (54.8 ± 14.0) or PRT (44.0 ± 16.0), P < 0.001.

The basic characteristics were tabulated according to three blood pressure categories in Table 1. Subjects who are older (P < 0.001), male (P < 0.001), not single (P < 0.001), physical laborer (P < 0.001), lower educational level (P < 0.001), Yi and Korean (P < 0.001), smokers (P < 0.001), drinkers (P < 0.001), liking high-salt diet (P = 0.003), general obese or overweight (P < 0.001), abdominal obese (P < 0.001) and with family history of cardiovascular diseases (P < 0.001) have higher prevalence of HRT. The prevalence rates of HT and PRT were 33.2 and 41.1 % for males, 27.0 and 33.2 % for females respectively. 40.8 % of subjects in 18–29 years old were HT or PRT, but 89.7 % of subjects in seventies were HT or PRT. With aging, the proportion of NT subjects declined gradually. The prevalences of HT and PRT across demographic variables were shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Prevalence conditions of hypertension and prehypertension (n(%))

Characteristics

HT (n = 14003)

PRT (n = 17281)

NT (n = 16211)

Z/χ2 *

P

Gender

27.591

<0.001

Male

6378 (33.2)

7902 (41.1)

4950 (25.7)

Female

7625 (27.0)

9379 (33.2)

11261 (39.8)

Age

9718.166

<0.001

18–29

729 (6.1)

4303 (34.7)

7007 (58.2)

30–39

1356 (17.0)

3145 (39.4)

3483 (43.6)

40–49

2840 (29.4)

3906 (40.4)

2930 (30.3)

50–59

3525 (43.1)

3031 (37.1)

1621 (19.8)

60–69

3455 (55.7)

1930 (31.1)

817 (13.2)

70–79

2098 (61.4)

966 (28.3)

353 (10.3)

Marital status

4733.453

<0.001

Married

12051 (34.7)

12878 (37.1)

9792 (28.2)

Single

645 (6.4)

3595 (35.4)

5902 (58.2)

Divorced/widowed

1307 (49.7)

808 (30.7)

517 (19.6)

Educational level

3391.819

<0.001

Illiterate or primary school

4505 (46.5)

3225 (33.3)

1968 (20.3)

High school

6906 (31.8)

8239 (37.9)

6591 (30.3)

University

2592 (16.1)

5817 (36.2)

7652 (47.6)

Occupation

49.867

<0.001

Physical laborer

9684 (38.7)

8820 (35.3)

6512 (26.0)

Laborer with mental work

4319 (19.2)

8461 (37.6)

9699 (43.1)

Ethnicity

332.522

<0.001

Han

10789 (30.3)

12874 (36.2)

11927 (33.5)

Yi

652 (26.7)

985 (40.3)

808 (33.0)

Miao

143 (22.2)

250 (38.9)

250 (38.9)

Mongolia

557 (31.6)

644 (36.6)

560 (31.8)

Tibetan

138 (15.6)

275 (31.1)

471 (53.3)

Korean

529 (36.5)

525 (36.2)

395 (27.3)

Hui

732 (28.2)

968 (37.3)

896 (34.5)

Tujia

293 (24.2)

444 (36.6)

475 (39.2)

Others

170 (18.6)

316 (34.5)

429 (46.9)

Smoker

374.036

<0.001

Never

10396 (28.1)

13092 (35.4)

13473 (36.5)

Current

3515 (34.0)

4133 (39.9)

2701 (26.1)

Former

92 (49.7)

56 (30.3)

37 (20.0)

Alcohol drinker

19.417

<0.001

No

10360 (28.1)

12992 (35.3)

13466 (36.6)

Yes

3643 (34.1)

4289 (40.2)

2745 (25.7)

High-salt diets

2.962

0.003

No

12479 (29.3)

15522 (36.4)

14617 (34.3)

Yes

1524 (31.2)

1759 (36.1)

1594 (32.7)

BMI

6399.594

<0.001

General obesity

3316 (58.8)

1776 (31.5)

551 (9.8)

Overweight

5886 (40.1)

5763 (39.3)

3026 (20.6)

Normal

4801 (17.7)

9742 (35.8)

12634 (46.5)

Abdominal obesity

76.4597

<0.001

Yes

8691 (47.0)

6473 (36.4)

3074 (16.6)

No

5312 (18.3)

10538 (36.4)

13137 (45.3)

Family history of cardiovascular diseases

8.0453

<0.001

No

12385 (29.0)

15533 (36.4)

14791 (34.6)

Yes

1618 (33.8)

1748 (36.5)

1420 (29.7)

*Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used, in which the statistic was Z or χ2

HT hypertension PRT prehypertension, NT Normotension

Table 2 gives the results of the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for prehypertension. After controlling other demographic characteristics, males had more than twice odds of getting prehypertension (OR = 2.076, 95 % CI: 1.952–2.208) than females. Subjects had more odds of getting prehypertension with aging. In univariate analysis, subjects who are single had lower odds of getting prehypertension while the divorced or widowed was in opposite direction. However, marital status was not statistically associated with prehypertension after controlling other demographic characteristics. In two logistic models, educational level was closely associated with prehypertension and higher educational level could reduce the prevalence compared to illiterate subjects or ones with primary school educational level. Compared to Han subjects, Yi and Hui subjects had a higher prevalence of prehypertension, but Miao, Tibetan and Tujia subjects were associated with a lower prevalence rate of prehypertension. Contrary to univariate analysis results, current smokers had lower prevalence hazard (OR = 0.741, 95 % CI: 0.688–0.798) in the multivariate model. However association between former smoker and prehypertension was not statistically significant. Alcohol drinking (OR = 1.147 95 % CI: 1.072–1.228) and family history of cardiovascular diseases (OR = 1.132, 95 % CI: 1.045–1.226) had similar effect on the prevalence of prehypertension. Abdominal obesity, general obesity or overweight could increase prevalence of prehypertension. In summary, after controlling other demographic characteristics, gender, age, educational level, occupation, ethnicity, smoking, alcohol drinking, BMI, abdominal obesity and family history of cardiovascular diseases were associated with prehypertension.

Table 2

Risk factors associated with prehypertension

Characteristics

Univariate logistic model

Multivariate logistic model

OR*

95 % CI*

OR*

95 % CI*

Gender

Male

1.917

1.833–2.005

2.076

1.952–2.208

Female

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

Age

18–29

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

30–39

1.470

1.383–1.563

1.201

1.090–1.322

40–49

2.171

2.042–2.308

1.607

1.456–1.773

50–59

3.045

2.835–3.270

2.081

1.868–2.319

60–69

3.847

3.515–4.210

2.498

2.204–2.831

70–79

4.456

3.922–5.063

2.948

2.514–3.457

Marital status

Married

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

Single

0.463

0.441–0.486

0.928

0.844–1.020

Divorced/widowed

1.188

1.061–1.331

1.003

0.888–1.134

Educational level

Illiterate or primary school

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

High school

0.763

0.715–0.814

0.919

0.851–0.992

University

0.464

0.434–0.495

0.687

0.627–0.752

Occupation

Physical laborer

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

Laborer with mental work

0.644

0.617–0.673

1.084

1.020–1.152

Ethnicity

Han

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

Yi

1.129

1.026–1.244

1.347

1.210–1.500

Miao

0.926

0.776–1.106

0.753

0.623–0.910

Mongolia

1.065

0.949–1.196

1.042

0.920–1.179

Tibetan

0.541

0.465–0.629

0.521

0.442–0.613

Korean

1.231

1.078–1.406

0.965

0.837–1.111

Hui

1.001

0.911–1.100

1.133

1.024–1.253

Tujia

0.866

0.759–0.988

0.779

0.677–0.898

Others

0.682

0.589–0.791

0.974

0.832–1.140

Smoker

Never

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

Current

1.575

1.492–1.662

0.741

0.688–0.798

Former

1.558

1.028–2.361

0.825

0.530–1.285

Alcohol drinker

No

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

Yes

1.619

1.535–1.709

1.147

1.072–1.228

High-salt diets

No

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

Yes

1.039

0.968–1.116

0.977

0.905–1.055

BMI

General obesity

4.180

3.785

2.460

2.190–2.763

Overweight

2.470

2.346

1.667

1.563–1.788

Normal

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

Abdominal obesity

Yes

2.734

2.601–2.873

1.371

1.280–1.467

No

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

Family history of cardiovascular diseases

No

1.0 (Ref.)

1.0 (Ref.)

Yes

1.172

1.089–1.262

1.132

1.045–1.226

*OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

Discussion

In developed counties and developing counties, prevalence of hypertension and prehypertension was different from others. In general, the prevalence of hypertension has been highest in industrial countries. For example, Wang Y mentioned that approximately 60 % of American adults have prehypertension or hypertension [10]. In China, the overall prehypertension prevalence rate was estimated to be 21.9 % among Chinese people aged from 35–74 years old from the InterASIA study conducted 10 years ago [21]. Compared to InterASIA study results, the prevalence rate of prehypertension were found increased greatly in the present study, in which the prevalence rates of hypertension and prehypertension were 29.5 and 36.4 % respectively in China. All previous hypertension survey about Chinese people were conducted in a province of China and didn’t include Chinese minorities [13, 14, 21], which was not representative for the general population in China. The present study is the first study to investigate the prevalence of prehypertension in a representative sample of general Chinese population with the largest sample size covering dozens of ethnicities. Given that our analysis excluded subjects suffering from some severe chronic diseases and having fever in the last 15 days, we believe the true prevalence of hypertension and prehypertension in general Chinese adults would be underestimated. This is an important public health issue and more attention should be paid to provide health education for hypertensive and prehypertensive people to treat their hypertension regularly.

Multivariate logistic regression model analysis found that gender, age, educational level, occupation, ethnicity, smoking, alcohol drinking, BMI, abdominal obesity and family history of cardiovascular diseases were associated with prehypertension. Male subjects had twice risk of prehypertenion and then males should pay more attention to blood pressure control. Higher educational level was a protective factor of prehypertension, which was similar as the findings from industrialized countries, in which high educational level was found to be associated with lower risk of hypertension [22–24]. People with higher educational level maybe have learned more health knowledge about blood pressure and developed more healthy life styles. Increased knowledge of a healthy life-style in order to prevent hypertension is of importance to public health. China is a multi-ethnic country and minorities have their specific dietary habits and life styles, which could influence their blood pressure status. We found that prevalence of prehypertension were statistically different between ethnicities. Both Okosun IS et al. and Agyemang C et al. have ever found that ethnic difference can influence the prevalence of hypertension and prehypertension [25, 26]. Subjects with family history of cardiovascular diseases had higher risk of prehypertension like previous findings [27, 28]. Consequently, people whose parents have suffered from cardiovascular diseases should supervise their blood pressure level more frequently. In contrary to univariate analysis, marital status was not statistically significant in multivariate logistic analysis. The possible cause was that the single was younger than others, which would be verified insignificant after adjusting age in multivariate analysis.

Life style factors were found closely associated with prehypertension. Contrary to the results in univariate analysis, current smokers had lower prevalence for prehypertension. Although association of smoking and prehypertension needs to be explored further, other studies reported similar results as this paper [13, 18, 29]. In this study, alcohol drinking was found as a risk factor for prehypertension. Fan AZ has ever reported that there was a direct association between higher alcohol consumption and a higher prevalence rate of prehypertension among non-hypertensive drinkers [30]. After controlling other demographic characteristics, general obesity had nearly 2.5-fold prevalence and overweight had nearly twice prevalence of prehypertension. Significant positive associations between overweight, general obesity, abdominal obesity and prehypertension were same as reported in previous reports [13, 31–33]. So, reducing alcohol drinking and keeping in shape would facilitate the control of blood pressure. Furthermore, although some reports have mentioned high-salt diet could increase risk for hypertension [34, 35], association of high-salted diet and prehypertension was not statistically significant in the present paper. This may be caused by recall bias resulted from self-reported diet conditions.

Several limitations have to be mentioned. First, due to the nature of cross-sectional study design, we could not make causation between potential risk factors and prehypertension. Second, criteria of defining prehypertension and hypertension only based on one time measure of blood pressure without follow-up information might not truly represent the prehypertension and hypertension status. Hypertension could of course be defined in different ways, one way is self-reported, and another way is that it is based on diagnosis in patient records or administrative databases. The different definitions of prehypertension and hypertension limit the comparison of prevalence figures from different studies. Finally, recall bias might exist in the current study due to self-report high-salt diet conditions.

Conclusions

Appropriately two-third of subjects was hypertensive or prehypertensive and high prevalence rate of prehypertension was general in Chinese adults. Many sociodemographic characteristics were significantly associated with hypertension and prehypertension conditions. There were important clinical significance and public health significance about age-specific, gender-specific and ethnic-specific hypertension and prehypertension studies in China. More health education should be provided for hypertensive people to treat their hypertension regularly. In addition, regular medical check-up and measuring blood pressure are necessary to improve awareness, treatment and control of hypertension.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all of the subjects who gave their time so generously to participate in the research.

Funding

This work is supported by the basic performance key project by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (No. 2006FY110300).

Availability of data and material

Data are held at the Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. All relevant data are within the paper.

Authors’ contributions

XT participated in the design of the study and the field survey, preformed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. LJT participated in the field survey and the blood pressure measurement. ZGJ conceived of the study. LJX helped to draft the manuscript. HSM conceived of the study and participated in its design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

All participants gave written or verbal consent for their accounts to be anonymously published.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the review board of Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. All included subjects gave their informed consent to participant in the study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Wang Y, Wang QJ. The prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension among US adults according to the new joint national committee guidelines: new challenges of the old problem. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2126–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar