As is well known, TEX uses four styles in mathematics: display (D), text (T), script (S) and script-script (SS). This style deﬁnes the size of fractions and mathematical operators, the style for how the upper and lower limits and indices are attached to mathematical operators, the default letter size used in mathematics, etc. The style in formulæ embedded in text starts from T, the style of formulæ placed in a separate block starts with D, and the styles are switched automatically in fractions, integrals, arrays, etc., as it is shown below:

Main styleD T S SS

Numerators and denominatorsT S SS SS

IndicesS S SS SS

Contrary to this scheme there are only three font scalings associated with four
mathematical styles since D-mode and T-mode use letters of the same size.
(It is not true for mathematical operators which are greater in D-mode than
in T-mode.) Say for the document at 10 pt, D and T correspond to the font at
10 pt, S---to the font at 7 pt, SS---to the font at 5 pt.

In Russian literature there is no difference between the styles of mathematical operators embedded in text and those placed separately. But four font sizes
are used instead of three: say, for the document at 10 dd these are 10 dd, 8 dd,
6 dd and 4 dd, and for the document at 12dd—12dd, 10 dd, 8 dd and 6 dd.
(Russian typography is based on Didot points---it follows French traditions,
not English ones,---and for this reason Russian fonts and spaces are a little bit
greater.)

Switching of font sizes in mathematical books is the following:

Main size 10 8 6 4

Numerators and denominators 8 6 4 4

Indices 6 6 4 4

(For newspapers and rapid communications, it is allowed not to decrease the
font size for multilevel formulæ at all.)

Suppose there is a fraction typed in display style---i. e., when 10 pt is the main
font size and 7 pt is the font size for superscripts and subscripts. In TEX the
numerator and denominator of this fraction are set in the 10 pt font and their
subscripts and superscripts are set at 7 pt as well, but their ‘big operators’ use
the \textstylemode instead of \displaystyle. The numerator and denominator of the nested fraction are set at 7 pt with the subscripts and superscripts
set at 5 pt, the next level fraction sets both numerator/denominator and their
subscripts/superscripts at 5 pt, more levels remain the font sizes unchanged.

In Russian mathematical publications the ﬁrst level fraction has the numerator and denominator set at 8 pt (8 dd) with subscripts and superscripts still
unchanged (i. e., at 6 pt) and with big operators set in \textstyle mode. It is
essential that for the nested fractions these speciﬁcations remain the same irrespective of the nesting level. (That is, switching to script style and scriptscript
style takes place for nested indices, not for nested fractions, square roots, etc.)

As a result, enclosed fractions do not decrease in size so strongly as in TEX
andmultilevel formulæ aremuch higher in Russian mathematics. To simulate
this effect, enclosed fractions are generally typed in \displaystyle which is
closer to the original style than that used in TEX.

This is a very complex problem so I would first try to ask or find templates. A short look on CTAN gives me for example disser or eskd. I guess that journals/universitys/etc. in Russia will offer templates? If neccessary you can use them as a good starting point ...
–
KurtDec 24 '12 at 9:49

1 Answer
1

Well, this is a big problem. I enjoy to speak in Russian and in fact I love the Slavic languages. There is a long time I was searching for something about typography in Russian, but in this part of the world it was impossible. I don't know about the traditions and the orthotypographical rules in Russian.

In fact this seems to be a problem about orthotypography. As surely you know, LaTeX is a kinda embodiment of TeX, and TeX was made by Donald Knuth thinking of the lead technology used since Gutenberg and when his father owned a small printing business and taught him bookkeeping. So as you can see, this is the reason why he used the pica point as the base of TeX and further of LaTeX and other embodiments of TeX like ConTeXt. So the definition of everything is in the core of LaTeX, TeX.

Notwithstanding don't be worry about it. In fact, LaTeX is able to work with different units, Didot points and ciceros included. We can work with those units for the layout, but I don't know how we can set up LaTeX for use them for all the typographical computations. Perhaps we need to program something, create a package or at least create a preamble where you can convert those sizes, i.e. if 1157 dd = 1238 pt, 12 dd should be 12.84 pt and then you should find a way of set this size as the normalsize and make the same with the other sizes you use. And with \newcommand and \renewcommand try to fix them all.

This can be the most primitive way, surely there are better ways to do it. Well, I'll need to read the article you cited before write a better idea. Good luck.