The Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 i7, 32GB RAM, 512GB SSD (2019) is one of the very best 2-in-1 Laptops that one can get for around $1,900. The HP ZBook Studio x360 G5 2YS52AV, 256GB PCIe SSD (2018), however, while a very good choice at its $3,000 price point, falls just short of being remarkable.

Returning to the HP ZBook Studio x360 G5 2YS52AV, 256GB PCIe SSD (2018), it managed to impress reviewers from some of the internet's most highly trusted sources, Laptop Mag and PCmag. It performed great in their hands-on roundups - it was named "The best HP workstation" by Laptop Mag and "Best for CAD Users, Engineers, Scientists; Frequent Presenters" by PCmag. That's quite an achievement, especially coming from such high-quality sources.

To get a better idea of how they fare when compared directly to each other, we analyzed review scores of sources that tested both. PCmag, for example, preferred the Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 i7, 32GB RAM, 512GB SSD (2019), while Laptop Mag rated both of them the same.

We also took a look at which sources had the best things to say about them. We learned that the Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 i7, 32GB RAM, 512GB SSD (2019) got reviewed the highest by Expert Reviews - it gave it a rating of 10, while the HP ZBook Studio x360 G5 2YS52AV, 256GB PCIe SSD (2018) most impressed reviewers at Laptop Mag, which gave it a score of 9.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other 2-in-1 Laptops on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by 2-in-1 Laptops being 7.6 out of 10, whereas the Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 i7, 32GB RAM, 512GB SSD (2019) and HP ZBook Studio x360 G5 2YS52AV, 256GB PCIe SSD (2018) managed averages of 8.8 and 7.7 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 i7, 32GB RAM, 512GB SSD (2019) vs. HP ZBook Studio x360 G5 2YS52AV, 256GB PCIe SSD (2018) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.