NASA Openly Admits Alien Life Exists: Get Ready for Disclosure

What's in that pipe of yours sir? Wow...you sure went off the far-out end of what I said.

You: "I'm hoping you are going to say Faeries, Elves or Demons cause i will believe that before i believe Aliens are our gods."

Me: I never said "aliens are our Gods" -you did...you also mentioned faeries, elves and demons...IS that what you believe? Interesting...

Stanton Freidman answered my question to him on "disclosure" here on ATS on his thread. He agreed with me there will be none.

We ignore every bit of "new" info on coming "disclosures"...We continue to ignore any and all evidence that MAY be considered affirmative to existence
of other civilizations out-there. Even you show you do not. You in fact...confirm my point.

We will continue to ignore "disclosures" and possible "evidence" that comes up...because there is no one single-speaking-for-the-whole-planet
representative...that everyone will accept nor believe. Been that way for thousands of years...

No one speaks for the world...not even you. Evident by bringing up the faeries and elves thing...

p. 58. "The Space Agency was quietly founded as a direct adjunct to the Department of Defense..."

Hoagland offers lame support for this contention with a quote from Sec. 305 (i) of the Space Act: "The Administration shall be considered a defense
agency of the United States for the purpose of Chapter 17, Title 35 of the US Code." He doesn't say how he knows the passage of this act was
"quiet."

He also complains -- as though he's only just come across this fact and is "shocked--SHOCKED" -- that Sec. 205(d) of the Act allows NASA activities to
be classified for reasons of national security.

FACT: Title 35 of the US Code is exclusively concerned with patent law. Title 35 Chapter 17 is concerned with patent applications filed by employees
of any defense agency, hence the inclusive definition in Sec 305(i). This is purely legal language, that emphatically does not mean that the agency
was founded, whether quietly or accompanied by 76 trombones, as a direct adjunct to the Department of Defense. A parade of NASA Administrators,
starting with James Webb, has expended political capital asserting NASA's independence from DoD.

They admit so.... many things... I'd be glad they'd admit they never went to the damn moon when they did.... if they did after, ok, but when they did,
THEY DIDNT. And even IF THEY EVER did.... remains to be proven.... now they talk about alien life?

Ok.... I guess I'll trust whatever "Never. A. Straight. Answer" says because.... noone knows why but... NOONE ELSE HAS BEEN TO THE MOON EVER AGAIN....
if it was so simple with that tech from the 60s.... why 50 years later noone has gone there yet?

Seriously.... have the Americans bought some exclusive pass there or something? BS....

Screw nasa... I hope it blows up and from the wreckage we can read all false documents (like the pristine IDs found on 911 lol)

For perspective, I've been a thorn in NASA's side for twenty years [see my book Star Crossed Orbits], over their reluctance to come clean on
shortcomings in their safety culture and international partnerships -- but they've learned I had [and have] too many friends still inside, who are
happy to help me get the whole story out. Sure, special stuff could be compartmentalized and stashed deeply away, but all astronaut operational stuff
flowed through Mission Control, and everybody had to be aware of all 'funnies' immediately for safety reasons.

But there -IS- a button at the Public Affairs console to cut video feed, I have a picture of it, I ought to post it here for laughs. There's no
indication it was ever used, even during the 'Columbia' disaster.

I haven't seen it, but there should be -- every console has detailed baseline plans. Somebody ought to FOIA a copy of the PAO Console Procedure, M2M
for how-to. The main scenarios I've been told privately involved body dismemberment in a depressurization or collision catastrophe. Naked astronauts,
not so much.

Imagine being a high level professional, and knowing something that the entire world would be astounded with, and not being able to tell. The mental
stress would certainly come to bear, and some indeed would probably seek professional advise on their own.

Further, I think the training they must have in order to posses such knowledge is really the major key to why they seem to keep it all together.
That, of course is if there really is anything big that is being kept a secret, but the sheer amount of information out there on the possibilities
seems to indicate that it may be true.

If it is true, then what has changed in the last 75 years that would really make us think we are going to find about it, on any given day? The
Internet, of course, would be an answer, but it has caused this information to be so readily available, that more and more people are exposed to it
every day. Yet, it still eludes us.

So silly. There's no need. You're just paranoid. NASA And our military are both American governmental organizations there's no need for one to
monitor the other. You know your like a pit bull when you get ahold of an idea. You just won't let go. Stubborn is what we call folks like you.

It's already been shown that they never said it couldn't be pointed at the moon. So if you're going to stick with this story please get the link where
NASA actually said this. Find that and copy of link it here. You know put your money where your mouth is.

a crinoid fossil was already found on mars. unfortunately it's just only a fossil and it's not intelligent life. i think what most of us want to know
is if there's intelligent life out there. i dont doubt for a minute that we will find microbes and small life forms on Europa for example, as for
little green men i have my doubts.

This thread should be deleted. I go on ATS because I want to avoid the 100s of websites that do nothing but post sensationalist titles that mix fact
with their opinion. Go to beforeitsnews dot com and you'll see what I mean. Its sensationalist garbage to attract gullible followers. Sort of like
this thread.

Read the thread. There are plenty of posts that steer folks away from crazy beliefs and offer good solid information. It's certainly more support for
no they didn't than yes they did.
We're not all fools here.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.