Media bias can net mistakes at the ballot box

June 25, 2008

The media slant political news to the left or right to increase ratings and profits, spinning up an information vacuum that can lead to mistakes at the ballot box, a new study by three University of Illinois economists says.

Media bias has become increasingly profitable given a polarized electorate in which conservatives and liberals want news coverage that tilts toward their political leanings, according to the study by Dan Bernhardt, Stefan Krasa and Mattias Polborn.

"You listen to news not just to get informed, but to be entertained," Krasa said. "And you're more entertained if they tell you you're right than if they tell you you're wrong."

But even though voters typically take the spin into account rather than following blindly and that the media only slant news rather than falsifying it, selective reporting can still factor into mistakes at the polls, according to findings that will appear in the Journal of Public Economics.

Voters get an incomplete picture as conservative media outlets favor Republicans and blast Democrats, while liberal outlets do just the opposite, according to the study, "Partisan Polarization and the Electoral Effects of Media Bias."

"Biased media suppresses information that is unfavorable to 'their' candidate, and even smart voters cannot completely recover the truth from their reports," Polborn said.

The study says media bias can also trip up voters who try to account for the slant some outlets put on the news.

For instance, an independent voter who hears only minor negative news about a Democrat through a conservative outlet could rightly infer that the Democrat has no glaring faults or they would have been trumpeted. But the Republican's quality remains in question because the voter rationally expects any negative news would be stifled.

Bernhardt and Krasa say the earnings-driven bias that tailors news to give conservatives or liberals what they want to hear could weigh on this fall's presidential race. Conservative media outlets will tout Republican John McCain's strengths and downplay or ignore weaknesses, while Democrat Barack Obama will get similar kid-glove treatment from left-leaning media, the economics professors say.

"Selective reporting by a liberal or conservative outlet can cause voters to make mistakes because they don't hear the whole story," Bernhardt said. "If collectively enough of them make mistakes it can switch the winner of the election."

Media bias could play an even bigger role in this year's presidential race because Obama is still a relative unknown whose positions and past will be selectively reported as they surface during the campaign, Bernhardt said.

"There could be too little crossover voting by moderate Republicans because if Obama turns out to be good it won't be reported by the media they use," Bernhardt said. "If it turns out he's bad, there could be too little crossover voting by moderate liberals."

Krasa says the impact of slanted reporting would only be felt in swing states such as Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania where moderate voters can sway an election.

"Media bias would not have a perceptible impact in non-swing states," Krasa said. "If a Democratic vote for McCain makes a difference in a blue state, like Illinois, he's going to win nearly every other state anyway, so it's irrelevant."

Opinion polls illustrate the ideological ties that media outlets such as alleged right-leaning Fox News or perceived liberally bent CNN use to expand their audience and, in turn, advertising revenues, according to the study.

A poll during the 2004 presidential campaign showed that among voters who get most election news from Fox, 70 percent supported President Bush, compared with 21 percent for Democratic rival John Kerry. The results were just the opposite among CNN viewers – 26 percent for Bush and 67 percent for Kerry.

The media's spin also influences views on seemingly factual matters, according to the study, citing a 2004 poll that showed 84 percent of Bush supporters thought Saddam Hussein had strong links to al Qaeda, compared with 37 percent of Kerry backers.

Krasa says averting bias-driven mistakes at the polls would require voters to seek out both sides, something most are unwilling to do because they don't think their vote will be pivotal.

"The problem is to avoid making mistakes you're asking voters to work harder, and it's not necessarily in their self-interest to do that," Bernhardt said. "So there's this paradox. Becoming better informed could potentially help everybody else because we would vote better and wouldn't make mistakes. But people don't internalize the consequences for everybody else, they only internalize their own. So they under invest in information. Most do."

Related Stories

The spread of fake online news has become a hot topic of conversation, particularly in the wake of the presidential election. According to a BuzzFeed news analysis, the top-performing fake election news stories posted on ...

Facebook is under fire for failing to rein in fake and biased news stories that some believe may have swayed the presidential election. Its predicament stems from this basic conundrum: It exercises great control over the ...

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg urged world leaders meeting in Peru on Saturday to help get more people online to improve global living standards while separately announcing new measures to cut down on fake news stories on the ...

As post mortems of the 2016 presidential election began to roll in, fingers started pointing to what psychologists call the confirmation bias as one reason many of the polls and pundits were wrong in their predictions of ...

Recommended for you

The recent suicide of Brandy Vela, a teen in Texas City, Texas, was a potent reminder of the sometimes tragic consequences of bullying. According to Vela's parents, the teen fatally shot herself Nov. 29 following months of ...

(Phys.org)—Douglas Petrovich, an archaeologist with Ontario's Wilfrid-Laurier University in Canada has sparked controversy in the ancient history scholarly community by making claims that he has found proof that Hebrew ...

Since 2008, MIT economist Tavneet Suri has studied the financial and social impacts of Kenyan mobile-money services, which allow users to store and exchange monetary values via mobile phone. Her work has shown that these ...

Researchers have discovered a dinosaur tail complete with its feathers trapped in a piece of amber. The finding reported in Current Biology on December 8 helps to fill in details of the dinosaurs' feather structure and evolution, ...

4 comments

Problem is 80% of reporters are liberal, where did this study find concervative reporters? Also interesting is the differnce between liberals and concervatives... ask the question, is it right to lie to, or diliberately mislead someone, so that they do what you truely think is best for them? I've asked this question to many avowed concervatives and liberals..... Concervatives typically say no (but how do I know they're not lying).... and liberals say yes.
However given the studies that show conservative lie less often than liberals... and that liberals typically try to get people to do what is right no matter how.... should show that getting information from concervative sites is typically more reliable and unbiased.

Problem is 80% of reporters are liberal, where did this study find concervative reporters?

That is SUCH crap. Even Bob Woodward, who was forced by Deep Throat to out Nixon's crimes, gives pattycake treatment to GWB, interviewing him with kid gloves as if he were a monarch with divne right, rather than an interview subject to be scrutinized and inquired into. Read "Bush at War", at least Part I. Gross.

And "thinking", have you never listened to Ann Coulter, Robert Novak, Wessley Clark, etc. etc. etc. Perhaps, to you, someone on CNN might be called "liberal" but for one outside of the US such as myself, with experience of genuine left-wing politics, calling any of them "leftist" is an absolute joke. And BTW, in Canada we have the Conservative Party, the Liberal Party, the New Democratic Party, and the Green Party. The first two are CLEARLY right-of-centre if the centre is considered the median point politically between a rightist and a leftist POV.

In truth, the ONLY left-of-centre news availale in the US that I can see are some "Comedy" shows like John Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Rob Corddry etc. They did a better job of covering the last election honestly than any news channel.

Please sign in to add a comment.
Registration is free, and takes less than a minute.
Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.