Rest of Iraq asks: where’s the U.S.?

As U.S. warplanes tilt the battlefield against Islamic militants in Kurdish-controlled territories, Iraqis in the rest of the country are growing resentful that the U.S. so far is not intervening more forcefully to protect Arabs who have been fighting extremists for months.

As U.S. warplanes tilt the battlefield against Islamic militants in Kurdish-controlled territories, Iraqis in the rest of the country are growing resentful that the U.S. so far is not intervening more forcefully to protect Arabs who have been fighting extremists for months.

They see the U.S. wading in to protect a favored ally in Iraq’s Kurdish Regional Government, but leaving the rest of Iraq to fend for itself since militants in the Islamic State displaced hundreds of thousands of Shiite Arabs when they seized the city of Mosul in June.

“From the beginning, the Iraqi government has asked America to step in to a dangerous situation for the Shiites,” said Farid al Ibrahimi, a Shiite lawmaker. “When (the Islamic State) tried to attack the Kurdistan region, the movement by the Americans was so, so, so fast.”

Calls from Iraq’s Shiite majority for more bombings come as the Islamic State retreats from its advance in the Kurdish north but continues to hold significant territory in the country’s Sunni Arab west and middle.

Other factions in Iraq also are clamoring for more U.S. military assistance. Some say they want Western forces to drive out the Islamic State because they don’t trust their own military not to inflict excessive collateral damage or to refrain from payback assaults on Sunni Arabs who stayed in territory held by the extremists.

“If America doesn’t help us, we will never go back,” said Bashir Hassan, 59, an Iraqi Turkman who has been homeless for nearly two months since the Islamic State attacked his village near the city of Tal Afar.

He’s a Shiite Muslim who no longer trusts his Sunni neighbors since militants moved into their community, and, he says, helped the Islamic State raid his home.

The extremist group’s high-water mark came Aug. 3, when it set off fears that it could hit the Kurdish capital of Irbil following an assault on the Kurdish city of Sinjar that drove tens of thousands of people into mountain hideaways.

The Kurds control a semiautonomous region in northern Iraq and they have long sought independence. They’ve been close U.S. allies since the Gulf War, when the U.S. created a no-fly zone that protected them from Saddam Hussein’s military.

On Sunday, U.S. jets hammered Islamic State positions near the Mosul Dam, clearing a path for Iraqi counter-terrorism and Kurdish troops to retake a facility that powers Iraq’s second largest city.

Closer to the capital, Baghdad residents have been bracing for attacks by the Islamic State since the group seized territory in Anbar Province in January.

“Soon next would be fall of Baghdad” tweeted one Islamic State representative on Sunday. The battle “will last for months.”

President Barack Obama on Aug. 7 authorized U.S. airstrikes in Iraq to protect U.S. personnel and to support humanitarian measures intended to free members of the Yazidi religious sect who had become trapped by the Islamic State after they fled Sinjar.

The order carried an implied agreement to protect Baghdad, which houses America’s largest embassy, but did not explicitly authorize strikes elsewhere in Iraq.

Obama told The New York Times that he did not launch strikes sooner because he wanted to pressure Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s supporters to choose a new leader who might settle longstanding disagreements among Iraq’s warring factions by nurturing a more inclusive government.

Since then, Maliki’s party selected lawmaker Haider al Abadi to follow Maliki, opening the door to increased American military support. U.S. officials have not described what kind of assistance they might offer, or said whether it would include airstrikes south of the traditionally Kurdish territory.

Shiites want a more explicit commitment now that they have rejected Maliki, as the Americans wanted.

“America is in charge of the defense of Iraq from whatever risk because America was the reason for the destruction of the infrastructure of Iraq and leaving the Iraqi army out of order, so they are obliged to protect Iraq,” said Razzaq al Hadari, a Shiite lawmaker from the Badr Bloc.

He called the U.S. “somehow lazy” in its reaction to the Islamic State’s first assault on Mosul.

Sunni leaders, likewise, have been calling for more direct intervention from the U.S. military. Jamila al Obeidi, a Sunni parliament member, wants U.S. assistance because she believes the Iraqi air force has hit too many innocents in its strikes on contested areas, such as her home city of Mosul.

Other Sunni tribal leaders have been seeking U.S. assistance to turn back extremists in their communities, an echo of the 2007 “Sunni Awakening” in Anbar Province when tribes worked with the U.S. military to expel al Qaida militants operating in their towns.

But some Iraqis are just as adamant that the U.S. should stay of Iraq as they were during the American occupation.

“The Americans are our enemies,” said Abu Faroq Jumaili, a former Iraqi army lieutenant colonel during Saddam’s regime. He is now leading fighters opposed to the Iraqi government in Anbar Province.

He said American bombs would fall on the very Iraqis who are now asking for more U.S. support.

“How did they forget that the Americans hit and bombed their houses? They are not far away from an air strike that will hit their houses again. We don’t trust the Americans,” he said.

McClatchy special correspondents Hussein Kadhim and Jamal Naji contributed to this report.