DoD News

News Article

Panel Says Rescind Policy on Women in Combat

By Lisa DanielAmerican Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, March 7, 2011  A commission established to study diversity among military leaders is recommending that the Defense Department rescind its policy that prevents women from being assigned to ground combat units below the brigade level.

In a report issued today, the Military Leadership Diversity Commission recommends that the department and the services eliminate combat exclusion policies for women, as well as other “barriers and inconsistencies, to create a level playing field for all qualified service members.”

Retired Air Force Gen. Lester L. Lyles, who chaired the commission, said the recommendation –- one of 20 in the report and the only one specific to women –- is one way the congressionally mandated body suggests the military can get more qualified women into its more-senior leadership ranks.

“We know that [the exclusion] hinders women from promotion,” Lyles said in an interview with American Forces Press Service. “We want to take away all the hindrances and cultural biases” in promotions.

The commission was established as part of the 2009 National Defense Authorization Act to evaluate and assess policies that provide opportunities for promotion and advancement of women and racial and ethnic minorities in the armed forces.

The 1994 combat exclusion policy, as written, precludes women from being “assigned” to ground combat units, but women have for years served in ground combat situations by serving in units deemed “attached” to ground units, Lyles said. That distinction keeps them from being recognized for their ground combat experience -- recognition that would enhance their chances for promotion, he said.

“If you look at today’s battlefield -- in Iraq and Afghanistan -- it’s not like it was in the Cold War, when we had a defined battlefield,” Lyles said. “Women serve -– and they lead –- military security, military police units, air defense units, intelligence units –- all of which have to be right there with combat veterans in order to do the job appropriately.”

“But they’re not getting the credit for being in combat arms,” he said, “[and] that’s important for their consideration for the most senior flag ranks -- three stars and four stars, primarily.”

In the commission’s outreach to military leaders, Lyles said, at least a couple of service leaders thought there would be little interest among women to serve in combat. But when the commission brought in a panel of commissioned and enlisted women from different services, “that’s certainly not what we picked up” from talking to them, he said.

“I didn’t hear, ‘Rah, rah, we want to be in combat,’” he said, “but I also didn’t hear, ‘We don’t want to be in combat.’ What they want is an equal opportunity to serve where their skills allow them to serve. Removing the barriers for that, and removing the barriers to them getting credit for that, was our No. 1 focus.”

Defense Department spokeswoman Eileen Lainez said department officials "will thoroughly evaluate" the panel’s recommendations as part of their ongoing review of diversity policies.

Meanwhile, she said, "Women will continue to be assigned to units and positions that may necessitate combat actions within the scope of their restricted positioning -- situations for which they are fully trained and equipped to respond."

Women make up about 15 percent of active-duty service members; 18 percent of National Guard and reserves; and ten percent of Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans; and 10 percent of those who have served in the Iraq and Afghanistan theaters, Lainez said.

Comments

Article is closed to new comments.

The opinions expressed in the following comments do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Defense.

3/11/2011 10:15:20 AM
barriers and inconsistencies, to create a level playing field for all qualified service members.” NOT TRUE for the majority of the military! There is NO problem with race and gender in the enlisted ranks. What we are talking about here is SR Officers Ranks WHICH are controlled by CONGRESS. SO, the problem lies WITH Congress NOT the whole service. Correct number we are REALLY talking For the Army, 230. (2) For the Navy, 160. (3) For the Air Force, 208. (4) For the Marine Corps, 60. DO we really need to risk young soldiers live over THESE numbers? TITLE 10 &gt; Subtitle A &gt; PART II &gt; CHAPTER 32 &gt; &#167; 526
- Tom, DC

3/9/2011 7:25:54 PM
The conclusions of the report seem to be preordained. Those that produced the report ignored the realities of combat and confused physical security duties with those of the infantry, armor, artillery and combat engineer personnel. Ground combat is more than guarding a gate or riding in a convoy. The physical demands are much higher; many men have trouble meeting the standards. There is also issue of fraternization, which is a continuing problem in all the services.- J. Lynwood, Florida

3/7/2011 4:02:17 PM
While women are still far from serving on the front lines, this study certainly elevates the conversation about whether or not they should be. It is good to see that diversity issues are being taken seriously in the services and resources are being dedicated to studying these issues. - ABG, D.C.