The Marlin .22 shown above was legally an “assault weapon” in New Jersey from 1990 to 2018

Arizona -(Ammoland.com)- -On June 13, 2018, the New Jersey Legislature ratcheted up its already dubious ban on standard capacity magazines of more than 15 rounds. The new infringement banned possession of standard capacity magazines of more than 10 rounds. The law was immediately challenged in court.

On 5 December, 2018, a three judge panel of the Third Circuit ruled the law was Constitutional, because the Second Amendment is a second rate right in the Bill of Rights.

The previous law in New Jersey had banned semi-auto .22 rimfire rifles with tubular magazines that held more than 15 rounds. It was enacted in 1990.

The 1990 law effectively banned numbers of common .22 rimfire hunting rifles in New Jersey. Those included many Marlin model 60 versions, .22 short versions of the Browning semi-auto, Remington 552 rifles, Remington 550 rifles, and any other .22 rimfire with a tubular magazine that holds more than 15 rounds of .22 ammunition.

The law was not a paper tiger. In 1993, Joseph Pelleteri had one of the Marlin .22 rifles that he had won in a contest at a police department. The magazine held 17 rounds of .22 Long Rifle. He was convicted of illegal possession of an assault weapon. He appealed. The appeals court upheld his conviction.

The Judge presiding over his case refused to even inform the jury that Mr. Pelleteri claimed he never read the owners manual and had no idea that the rifle was subject to the “assault firearms” ban and the appellate division affirmed the decision: “Defendant's failure to inspect the weapon or read the owner's manual to determine whether it fell within the statutory definition was unreasonable as a matter of law. We find no error in the trial judge's refusal to submit the issue to the jury.”

In 2018, banning .22 rifles with tubular magazines that held over 10 rounds would turn huge numbers of owners of .22 rifles into felons, overnight. It never bothered the New Jersey legislature before.

Someone with a little bit of knowledge [or by mere accident] managed to insert a change in the law that makes sense.

Instead of continuing the ban on .22 rimfire semi-autos that can hold 15 rounds or more, they removed the magazine limit for .22 rimfire semi-autos with tubular magazines. Here is the new law. From njleg.state.nj.us (bold added):

(4) A semi-automatic rifle with a fixed magazine capacity exceeding [15] 10 rounds. “ Assault firearm” shall not include a semi-automatic rifle which has anattached tubular device and which is capable of operating only with .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.

(snip)

y. “Large capacity ammunition magazine” means a box, drum, tube or other container which is capable of holding more than [15] 10 rounds of ammunition to be fed continuously and directly therefrom into a semi-automatic firearm. The term shall not include an attached tubular device which is capable of holding only .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.

The law effectively repealed the 1990 ban on numerous .22 sporting rifles.

It is too late for Mr. Pelleteri and others. They won't get back their lost freedom, tens of thousands in legal costs, or their right to keep and bear arms. For 28 years, from 1990 to 2018, gun owners in New Jersey have been victimized by a silly law passed by an ignorant legislature.

The current law is being appealed to the Supreme Court. There is a small chance the court will take the case (grant certiorari). If they do, there is a good chance they will rule the whole massive infringements of the New Jersey magazine bans as unconstitutional.

That is what should happen. In the last ten years, since the McDonald decision, the Supreme Court has declined to grant review to at least 88 Second Amendment cases, according to the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. The Court only accepts about 80 cases each year, about one percent of the cases filed for Supreme Court review.

Maybe the Court will grant a writ of certiorari for the New Jersey case, but I wont be betting on it.

Dean Weingarten

About Dean Weingarten:

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

Bottom line?… ya gotta be ready to die. Ya gotta be ready to die anyway under ‘any’ circumstances.
“Require those who make the laws be the ones to break down the doors.” Then we’ll see how soon these punk bastard gun haters melt into obscurity and the Second Amendment regains its status as an uncontested right of the uniquely free American person/citizen.
And ‘no,’ I certainly am no hero, nor do I want to be. I just want to be left alone.
“One of the most cherished of all rights is the right to be left alone.”
― Supreme Court Justice Brandeis

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. ?????????? Is that not what is happening why are the gun owners of this country not standing together and fighting for there rights? The NRA is doing the best they can but the everyday gun owners should take to the streets and and stand in front of the white house and say hell no!! It won’t be long before we can’t own a pop gun good God I bet people wish that they would have voted red now but that day is gone today we could stand together and save our tomorrow be for we are all in chains and crying about what we could have done

To be accurate, the Second Amendment was drafted and sent to the States for ratification in 1789. It took two years before the States ratified the Bill of Rights. Things were written with feather quill pen and ink. But the amendment sent by Congress had ONE COMMA. The extra two commas were just an accident, somebody added them so a speaker could take a breath.
With the extra commas it is possible to read ( the militia shall not be infringed }. The World Book and Britannica used one comma for a hundred years, but sometime in the late 1960s they added the extra commas.
Read about Patrick Henry and his objections of the 1788 Constitution that did not protect citizens’ rights with Congress having te sole power to arm the militia.
Try this – A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state? [Yes, therefore] “The right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

A little bit at a time, the leftists will end up taking our gun rights away which is immoral as pelosi would say , and we will end up like China or somewhere similar. Because we don’t have enough decent people left to help us win this silly little war !

“The law was not a paper tiger. In 1993, Joseph Pelleteri had one of the Marlin .22 rifles that he had won in a contest at a police department. The magazine held 17 rounds of .22 Long Rifle. He was convicted of illegal possession of an assault weapon. He appealed. The appeals court upheld his conviction.”

Note that is the supreme court finds the 10 round magazine law unconstitutional, NJ will revert to the previous law, and those .22lr rifles will become “assault weapons” again. Will they invalidate *all* magazine restrictions? I doubt it.