GPTU WEBSITE

Thursday, 11 February 2016

Another attack on local democracy? proposed new divestment rules Campaign Against Climate Change

Another attack on local democracy?

Submitted by Claire on Wed, 2016/02/10 - 12:01pm

Divestment campaigners are worried that the government's current
consultation on local authority pensions investment contains a significant
attack on local democracy and ethical investment.

The main purpose of the proposed new rules will be to require local
authorities to be more cost-effective by pooling their pension funds in larger
groupings. But within the consultation are explicit restrictions on local
authority ethical investment decisions. The main intent appears to be preventing boycotts of companies operating within the
illegal settlements in the West Bank.

Divestment from the UK arms industry would also be forbidden:
"using pensions and procurement policies to pursue boycotts, divestments
and sanctions against foreign nations and the UK defence industry are
inappropriate" (Research in
2007 revealed local council pension funds to have over £300 million invested in
BAE alone).

It is acknowledged that local authorities may have regard to
"environmental, social and corporate governance matters". But when
the government is seeking to restrict local authorities' investment choices to
prevent disinvestment in some areas, it is hard to be confident that
restrictions on fossil fuel divestment will not follow within guidance (as yet
unpublished). If local authorities have to stick to central government policy
and invest in UK arms companies, will government be any keener to allow them to
divest from fracking? New regulations would give the Secretary of State the
power to intervene if a local authority is deemed not to be following
government guidance.

It has been calculated that local authorities' pension funds have
altogether £14 billion invested into fossil fuel companies. Under pressure from
local campaigns, some have taken the first steps towards divestment. Oxford council will make no further direct investments in
fossil fuel companies. South Yorkshire pension fund committed to divest from
coal and tar sands companies, Haringeyto divest from coal and invest a third of its funds in
a low-carbon fund, and neighbouring Hackney are reviewing their fossil fuel investments. As
global divestment campaigning has now led to over 500 institutions divesting,
fully or partially, from fossil fuels, many more councils are expected to join
these.

Alongside this, local councils can make positive investment decisions,
for example in low carbon infrastructure such as locally owned renewable energy
or public transport - divest to re-invest.

But will new restrictions put a brake on this?

The government's consultation states that in formulating their policies
on investment and environmental, social and corporate governance matters, local
authorities' "predominant concern should be the pursuit of a financial
return on their investments". As Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of
England, stated last year, the financial system has not responded
adequately to threats posed by climate change, such as stranded assets in
unburnable fossil fuels (the 'carbon bubble') partly because such risks are
seen to be in a future beyond the normal business (and political) cycle. If any
investments are obliged to take account of these long-term risks, it should be
pension funds.

The consultation is open until 19 February.
Several organisations have put together a joint e-action to
allow you to submit a quick response. If you are able to spend a few minutes
writing a response to the consultation in your own words (send to LGPSReform@communities.gsi.gov.uk)
stressing the importance of democratic investment decisions made locally on
ethical grounds in relation to fossil fuels as well as human rights, arms
trade, and other issues of concern, this would have greater weight.

Please share widely with friends and networks - particularly those whose
own pensions will be affected.

Why do we say this is 'another' attack on local democracy?

The government's localism rhetoric seems to be wearing thin when
councils fail to endorse fracking in their area. David Cameron gave
reassurances last summer that "decisions must be made by local authorities
in the proper way, under the planning regime we have," but a few months
later the Secretary of State announced that he was prepared to overrule Lancashire council on fracking. And a recently leaked letter revealed plans to remove decision-making powers from local councils, putting
them in the hands of planning inspectors instead.

This follows previous measures to fast-track fracking planning applications. These are in stark
contrast to restrictions placed
on local authorities to make it much more difficult for them to approve onshore
wind. It seems that only one of these industries is deemed 'in the national
interest' - unfortunately it is the one which is a threat to our climate.

Please contact P.Murry at yrrumuk@googlemail.com if you are interested.

GREEN LEFT FRINGE AT AUTUMN CONFERENCE 2012

Both Green Left and the Green Party Trade Union Group applied to have fringes at the Green Party Conference September 7-10 2012, Conferences Committee turned down both these requests. Green Left decided to mount a fringe outside conference at 6-8pm on Saturday 8th September GPTU agreed to support this meeting and contribute towards costs of room hire. Video clips at http://greenleftblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/green-left-fringe-fringe-at-green-party.html