FBI Director James Comey concludes his appearance before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, on Capitol Hill in Washington, July 7, 2016, to explain his agency’s recommendation to not prosecute Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton over her private email setup during her time as secretary of state.

Nearly four months after hailing FBI Director James B. Comey’s statement that “no reasonable prosecutor” would charge Hillary Clinton with a crime, Democrats are now furious with Comey.

The Clinton campaign called his decision to publicly announce the review of newly discovered emails related to the Clinton investigation “extraordinary.” DNC Chair Donna Brazile called it “irresponsible.” Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., called it “appalling.” And a New Yorker piece Saturday shows just how contentious the decision was within the law enforcement community; Attorney General Loretta Lynch reportedly opposed it.

Partisans will certainly disagree about whether Comey did the right thing.

What’s clear, though, is that he was faced with a completely unprecedented no-win situation with two horrible options.

As that New Yorker piece and a new Washington Post editorial note, the Justice Department doesn’t generally comment on ongoing investigations in this manner. Former Attorney General Eric Holder formalized this practice four years ago, writing in a memo that officials “may never select the timing of investigative steps or criminal charges for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party.”

But that ideal has run headlong into a hugely unusual set of circumstances and political realities.

In this case, the politics are already very much a part of this process, the investigation was already known about, and either decision Comey made could have had fear-reaching political implications – in this election and beyond. What’s more, there were just 11 days left in the election when Comey made the announcement Friday. That is certainly an “extraordinary” set of circumstances that Comey had to wrestle with, so he made an extraordinary – in the truest sense of the term – decision.

The alternative for Comey here was to say nothing about the newly discovered emails. That would certainly have been the easier course in the near-term, because it wouldn’t have inserted the FBI into the final days of the campaign.

But what if there did turn out to be something of real substance that altered his evaluation of this case, and it didn’t come out until after the election and after Hillary Clinton was elected president? Imagine the scandal that would arise if and when it was discovered that the Justice Department had these emails before the election and chose to sit on them.

If that did happen, the Justice Department could certainly defend itself by citing that longstanding policy of not commenting on ongoing investigations. Just following protocol, it would say. But that defense almost definitely wouldn’t pass muster with half the country. And let’s not forget how many people think Clinton’s private email server is a very legitimate issue; a poll after Comey’s July announcement showed 56 percent of the country thought Clinton should have been charged with a crime.

It’s hard to overstate what a massive scandal this would be.

Of course, if this decision ultimately helps Donald Trump come back and win the presidency, that will also cause huge blowback. But at least in that case, the FBI couldn’t be accused of covering something up; its sin would be in being too forthcoming.

Democrats view this as Comey – a Republican appointee who is no longer a registered member of the GOP – bowing to political pressure that has been applied by Republicans. Donald Trump has been crying foul about a “rigged” political system for months, and his supporters are eating it up. He’s also been arguing for months that Clinton should be in jail or a special prosecutor should look at the case again, which his supporters also eat up.

That is the backdrop on which Comey had to make this decision, and there’s no way the politics could be avoided. Law enforcement decisions should be independent of politics in an ideal world, but that’s just wasn’t plausible in this case. The public’s confidence in the legal process is at stake.

Comey was confronted with an unprecedented situation and two very bad decisions, and he chose short-term pain over the prospect of a long-term scandal. Nobody should envy him right now.

Democrats Ed Perlmutter and Jared Polis have joined their Republican congressional colleagues in backing legislation that would allow the Bureau of Land Management to relocate it headquarters to the West, and possibly to Colorado.

Two conservative taxpayer advocacy groups filed suit Wednesday against new Denver campaign finance disclosure rules for issue advocacy committees that they say will violate the privacy rights of their donors.