Concept car provides roadside bomb protection

Casualties in Iraq from Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) have dropped as the number of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles has increased, but with roadside bombs still responsible for the majority of casualties to coalition forces in Afghanistan, there is a need for a smaller, more nimble version more suited to its rugged, mountainous terrain. A new concept that would see military vehicles built around a protected personnel compartment and use a sacrificial “blast wedge” to absorb energy could improve safety for the occupants of future light armored patrol vehicles.

The concept, dubbed ULTRA II, designed and tested by researchers from the Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) builds on an earlier GTRI development for the ONR that evaluated new concepts for light armored vehicles. Instead of up-armoring a standard vehicle or modifying an existing drive train the researchers built a bubble of force protection first and then addressed vehicle mobility.

“The idea was to emphasize warfighter protection first by starting with design of an improved crew compartment, as opposed to starting with an existing vehicle and trying to add armor,” said Vince Camp, a GTRI senior research engineer and the project’s principal investigator.

The ULTRA II crew compartment was designed to house six persons: a driver and commander facing forward, and two pairs of crew members behind them, each pair facing opposite sides of the vehicle. By putting their backs toward the center of the crew compartment, the concept moves the crew away from the outside walls to reduce the likelihood of injury from side blasts, provides better visibility for the crew to monitor their surroundings, allows blast-resistant seats to be frame-mounted - and facilitates faster egress from the vehicle.

The crew compartment envisioned by GTRI uses a “space frame” constructed of tubular steel - similar to civilian off-road racing vehicles. An armored steel “skin” provides added structure and moderate ballistic and blast protection. Additional armor is bolted onto the frame in a modular way, allowing varying levels of protection that could be easily modified in the field and changed as new high-performance armor concepts are developed.

An integral part of the protection is provided by a “blast wedge” bolted onto the bottom of the vehicle. Constructed of welded steel armor, the wedge both deflects energy away from the vehicle and absorbs energy from a blast, performing a function similar to “crumple zones” in modern civilian vehicles.

V-shaped hull designs have already proven successful on MRAP vehicles already in service in Iraq and Afghanistan such as the Cougar and tests using a heavily-instrumented test compartment with instrumented dummies simulating the crew showed that the Ultra II’s wedge deflected or absorbed nearly 70 percent of the energy from an explosion beneath it. Damage from the blast was primarily confined to the sacrificial blast wedge and there was no structural damage and no blast penetration to the crew compartment.

“Energy used up in crushing and tearing the metal in the blast wedge is energy that wouldn’t go into injuring the crew,” said Kevin Massey, a GTRI senior research engineer who was part of the project team. “Data from the instrumented dummies shows that had this test been conducted with real warfighters in a real vehicle, we wouldn’t have seen any spinal injuries, head trauma, neck trauma or leg injuries.”

Because the wedge is removable, it could be replaced if damaged. Making the blast wedge removable also allows for an overall reduction of the vehicle’s height for shipping, an important issue for rapid deployment.

In addition to crew protection, the researchers also designed a translating door that would provide a large side opening similar to that of existing civilian minivans. Such a door system would provide improved ingress/egress for the crew and could remain open when the vehicle is moving.

GTRI has presented data from the test to the Office of Naval Research, and hopes to pursue additional refinements to the blast wedge and overall vehicle concept. Among the goals would be to improve energy absorption from the blast wedge, and to evaluate whether the crew compartment should separate from the drive train in certain types of blasts.

“We think that the concept of a space-frame design is a very viable one, and we want to take the lessons we’ve learned so far to improve on it,” Massey added. “We’d also like to see if the concept of the energy-absorbing wedge can be applied to existing vehicles that are already out there. The bottom line is saving people’s lives and protecting them from injury.”

Darren's love of technology started in primary school with a Nintendo Game & Watch Donkey Kong (still functioning) and a Commodore VIC 20 computer (not still functioning). In high school he upgraded to a 286 PC, and he's been following Moore's law ever since. This love of technology continued through a number of university courses and crappy jobs until 2008, when his interests found a home at Gizmag. All articles by Darren Quick

These people are using tax dollars to re-invent the wheel. There is absolutely nothing here that hasn't already been developed and build for thousands of MRAPs and other protected vehicles. All these techniques - and many more besides - have been known for quite some time by companies like Plasan, Force Protection and others.

This is pork in it's purest form; nothing but a boondoggle.

JonBaum 5th November, 2009 @ 12:35 am PST

That's pretty ignorant of you, Jon.

Speaking as someone who has ridden in every type of Mine-Resistant vehicle currently fielded by the US military, and as one who has had his life saved by a couple of them, I fully support this project.

There is much here that does not exist in present models. The outward-facing seating has advantages beyond blast protection that I won't get into. Removable "blast wedge" designs could lead to faster battle-damage turnaround. One of the most effective mine-resistant vehicles I've seen is specifically designed to be blown apart and rebuilt.

I will say, though- if they tested the wedge and all the dummies "lived", they didn't use a big enough bomb. No matter how much armor you have, there can always be a bigger bomb. Always. That doesn't mean vehicles like this are pointless, but it does emphasize the benefits of maneuverability. Current MRAP designs are too heavy and too unwieldy for many environments, and there are times that they take bomb hits simply because their movement is restricted.