Charles Siebert 's An Elephant Crackup?

974 Words4 Pages

Over the past few decades, relations between animals and humans have been modified drastically. From domesticated species’ to wildlife, it seems as though human interaction has taken a dramatic toll on the way animals’ function in the 21st century. Particularly, an account that focuses on this dramatic toll is that of Charles Siebert’s, an essayist whose observations bring a fascinating perspective to the correlation between wildlife habitat disruption and uninhibited human nature. Siebert’s essay for The New York Times Magazine, entitled, “An Elephant Crackup?” has raised many eyebrows over the past few years with regard to the destruction of a species that might suffer from something more than meets the eye. The author of this essay is aware of his audience, so respectively, the tone of his essay diverges into a new plane, a plane that is dreary and drab, yet in the same way, remains thought provoking and systematically contingent. Siebert doesn’t waste a second pushing his account across the table. New information is provided within each paragraph, which proves his use of systematic contingency. Charles Siebert, who is also responsible for writing “Wickerby: An Urban Pastoral” (1999), a tale that revolves around the surroundings and observations of Siebert, understands what it means to tie in environmental awareness with solution, and his solution is hidden within the text. Extinction is a topic that is commonly discussed when issues like this are brought up, however, a

between the psychology of an individual and groups? Collective and individual behavior is surprisingly similar, and depending on the circumstances, identical. In Charles Siebert essay “An Elephant Crackup,” he validates to readers, through social elephant narratives and herd mentality theory, that similarly to an individual elephant all elephants behave in similar ways. Furthermore, Sherry Turkle in selections from her work Alone Together accounts for individuals’ reactions to emerging robotic social

convenient and inexpensive” (Moss 262). Whereas, in An Elephant Crackup?, by Charles Siebert, we assimilate the fact that “elephant behavior is entirely congruent with what we know about humans and other mammals” (Siebert 357). The dynamics of a “precipitous collapse of elephant culture” or “crackup” described by Charles Siebert, in An Elephant Crackup?, can be used to analyze and understand America’s relationship with processed food because elephants are observed through an anthropomorphized lens. It

Authors Charles Seibert, Martha Stout and Daniel Gilbert talk about how independent species deal with their traumatic experiences; however, every author demonstrates discrete case studies where different species use distinct methods to embrace their psychological defense mechanism to maintain equanimity which sequentially conditions their reality.
In Charles Seibert’s essay “The Elephant Crackup?”, he voices his concern by talking about the elephants in the regions of Africa who

of unifying the world, by utilizing a passage from “Project Classroom Makeover” by Cathy Davidson, a “Selection from Losing Matt Shepard: Life and Politics in the Aftermath of Anti-Gay Murder” by Beth Loffreda, and the passage “An Elephant Crackup?” by Charles Siebert.
Emphasizing similarities helps to humanize other creatures in the eyes of other human. For more than three centuries an entire race of people was deemed to be lesser than wild animals and were enslaved, and deprived of self-worth

manifests itself in the individual without having adverse effects on those surrounding the victim. Yet, there exists unity between the community and the individual in finding a solution to the traumatic experiences. In “An Elephant Crackup”, Charles Siebert discusses impact that elephants afflicted by traumatic experiences have on a herd while Martha Stout shows how people attempt to keep their traumatic experiences contained and the negative effects of such method. A community that wishes to protect their