You edit a lot after posting, don't you? That's the second time you've replied to me and changed something when I look at it again. Is your assertion that I use 'schtick' based on a scientific study or are you just generalizing based on a limited data set?

I think the OP is right in the sense that people are going to assume their black classmates are there because of AA (even if unwarranted). I'd hate to be a black person that got a 175 on the LSAT. I'd have a female dog of a time convincing people I was there out of merit

I wouldn't waste a second trying to convince some sorry hater that I deserve to be @ X Law School. The only people I'll worry about are my professors; for them, my work will speak for itself. Any student pathetic enough to waste mental energy on such inconsequential nonsense, such as my supposed "inferiority," will just have to get used to seeing me around. I've already made my decision: I will not share my #s (even if I score a 175 on the JUNE LSAT LOL) with anyone @ my future law school. They'll just have to wonder...or squirm .

You're funny. I think all your posturing is your way of convincing yourself that race based AA is fair. I bet your praying for a good score so you can trumpet it to all who'll listen. P.S. = a 147 on the LSAT.

Oh, dear! Are you still bitter about your failure to penetrate the T6?

Awwwwwww, snap, girlfriend!

I was just giving friendly advice as far as the whole is concerned. Most people who do that tend do be, um, how to put this delicately, mm, let's say, they tend to be somewhat limited in their vocabulary. It would have been more polite to say 'thank you', and never do it again. The crack about the T6 was uncalled for and factually incorrect.

Most people, Eastend? You're one of the most unimpressive posters in this thread, though I give you kudos for being the surliest hypocrite.

And the "crack about the T6"? Now that was appropriate and is in fact correct.

Logged

"I don't believe in the word 'impossible,' because the One in whom I believe can do the impossible." - Me

I think the OP is right in the sense that people are going to assume their black classmates are there because of AA (even if unwarranted). I'd hate to be a black person that got a 175 on the LSAT. I'd have a female dog of a time convincing people I was there out of merit

I wouldn't waste a second trying to convince some sorry hater that I deserve to be @ X Law School. The only people I'll worry about are my professors; for them, my work will speak for itself. Any student pathetic enough to waste mental energy on such inconsequential nonsense, such as my supposed "inferiority," will just have to get used to seeing me around. I've already made my decision: I will not share my #s (even if I score a 175 on the JUNE LSAT LOL) with anyone @ my future law school. They'll just have to wonder...or squirm .

You're funny. I think all your posturing is your way of convincing yourself that race based AA is fair. I bet your praying for a good score so you can trumpet it to all who'll listen. P.S. = a 147 on the LSAT.

Oh, dear! Are you still bitter about your failure to penetrate the T6?

Awwwwwww, snap, girlfriend!

I was just giving friendly advice as far as the whole is concerned. Most people who do that tend do be, um, how to put this delicately, mm, let's say, they tend to be somewhat limited in their vocabulary. It would have been more polite to say 'thank you', and never do it again. The crack about the T6 was uncalled for and factually incorrect.

Most people, Eastend? You're one of the most unimpressive posters in this thread, though I give you kudos for being the surliest hypocrite.

And the "crack about the T6"? Now that was appropriate and is in fact correct.

I think the OP is right in the sense that people are going to assume their black classmates are there because of AA (even if unwarranted). I'd hate to be a black person that got a 175 on the LSAT. I'd have a female dog of a time convincing people I was there out of merit

I wouldn't waste a second trying to convince some sorry hater that I deserve to be @ X Law School. The only people I'll worry about are my professors; for them, my work will speak for itself. Any student pathetic enough to waste mental energy on such inconsequential nonsense, such as my supposed "inferiority," will just have to get used to seeing me around. I've already made my decision: I will not share my #s (even if I score a 175 on the JUNE LSAT LOL) with anyone @ my future law school. They'll just have to wonder...or squirm .

You're funny. I think all your posturing is your way of convincing yourself that race based AA is fair. I bet your praying for a good score so you can trumpet it to all who'll listen. P.S. = a 147 on the LSAT.

Oh, dear! Are you still bitter about your failure to penetrate the T6?

Awwwwwww, snap, girlfriend!

I was just giving friendly advice as far as the whole is concerned. Most people who do that tend do be, um, how to put this delicately, mm, let's say, they tend to be somewhat limited in their vocabulary. It would have been more polite to say 'thank you', and never do it again. The crack about the T6 was uncalled for and factually incorrect.

Most people, Eastend? You're one of the most unimpressive posters in this thread, though I give you kudos for being the surliest hypocrite.

And the "crack about the T6"? Now that was appropriate and is in fact correct.

I'm embarrassed for you. When do you sit the LSAT?

Don't be, Eastend.

Worry about YOUR shame and bitterness.

Logged

"I don't believe in the word 'impossible,' because the One in whom I believe can do the impossible." - Me

I think the OP is right in the sense that people are going to assume their black classmates are there because of AA (even if unwarranted). I'd hate to be a black person that got a 175 on the LSAT. I'd have a female dog of a time convincing people I was there out of merit

I wouldn't waste a second trying to convince some sorry hater that I deserve to be @ X Law School. The only people I'll worry about are my professors; for them, my work will speak for itself. Any student pathetic enough to waste mental energy on such inconsequential nonsense, such as my supposed "inferiority," will just have to get used to seeing me around. I've already made my decision: I will not share my #s (even if I score a 175 on the JUNE LSAT LOL) with anyone @ my future law school. They'll just have to wonder...or squirm .

You're funny. I think all your posturing is your way of convincing yourself that race based AA is fair. I bet your praying for a good score so you can trumpet it to all who'll listen. P.S. = a 147 on the LSAT.

Oh, dear! Are you still bitter about your failure to penetrate the T6?

Awwwwwww, snap, girlfriend!

I was just giving friendly advice as far as the whole is concerned. Most people who do that tend do be, um, how to put this delicately, mm, let's say, they tend to be somewhat limited in their vocabulary. It would have been more polite to say 'thank you', and never do it again. The crack about the T6 was uncalled for and factually incorrect.

Most people, Eastend? You're one of the most unimpressive posters in this thread, though I give you kudos for being the surliest hypocrite.

And the "crack about the T6"? Now that was appropriate and is in fact correct.

I think the OP is right in the sense that people are going to assume their black classmates are there because of AA (even if unwarranted). I'd hate to be a black person that got a 175 on the LSAT. I'd have a female dog of a time convincing people I was there out of merit

I wouldn't waste a second trying to convince some sorry hater that I deserve to be @ X Law School. The only people I'll worry about are my professors; for them, my work will speak for itself. Any student pathetic enough to waste mental energy on such inconsequential nonsense, such as my supposed "inferiority," will just have to get used to seeing me around. I've already made my decision: I will not share my #s (even if I score a 175 on the JUNE LSAT LOL) with anyone @ my future law school. They'll just have to wonder...or squirm .

You're funny. I think all your posturing is your way of convincing yourself that race based AA is fair. I bet your praying for a good score so you can trumpet it to all who'll listen. P.S. = a 147 on the LSAT.

Oh, dear! Are you still bitter about your failure to penetrate the T6?

Awwwwwww, snap, girlfriend!

I was just giving friendly advice as far as the whole is concerned. Most people who do that tend do be, um, how to put this delicately, mm, let's say, they tend to be somewhat limited in their vocabulary. It would have been more polite to say 'thank you', and never do it again. The crack about the T6 was uncalled for and factually incorrect.

Most people, Eastend? You're one of the most unimpressive posters in this thread, though I give you kudos for being the surliest hypocrite.

And the "crack about the T6"? Now that was appropriate and is in fact correct.

I think the OP is right in the sense that people are going to assume their black classmates are there because of AA (even if unwarranted). I'd hate to be a black person that got a 175 on the LSAT. I'd have a female dog of a time convincing people I was there out of merit

I wouldn't waste a second trying to convince some sorry hater that I deserve to be @ X Law School. The only people I'll worry about are my professors; for them, my work will speak for itself. Any student pathetic enough to waste mental energy on such inconsequential nonsense, such as my supposed "inferiority," will just have to get used to seeing me around. I've already made my decision: I will not share my #s (even if I score a 175 on the JUNE LSAT LOL) with anyone @ my future law school. They'll just have to wonder...or squirm .

You're funny. I think all your posturing is your way of convincing yourself that race based AA is fair. I bet your praying for a good score so you can trumpet it to all who'll listen. P.S. = a 147 on the LSAT.

Oh, dear! Are you still bitter about your failure to penetrate the T6?

Awwwwwww, snap, girlfriend!

I was just giving friendly advice as far as the whole is concerned. Most people who do that tend do be, um, how to put this delicately, mm, let's say, they tend to be somewhat limited in their vocabulary. It would have been more polite to say 'thank you', and never do it again. The crack about the T6 was uncalled for and factually incorrect.

Most people, Eastend? You're one of the most unimpressive posters in this thread, though I give you kudos for being the surliest hypocrite.

And the "crack about the T6"? Now that was appropriate and is in fact correct.

I'm embarrassed for you. When do you sit the LSAT?

Don't be, Eastend.

Worry about YOUR shame and bitterness.

Dang girl, don't hold back.

"Girl"? Your attempt at comeuppance is weak and witless, Eastend.

Logged

"I don't believe in the word 'impossible,' because the One in whom I believe can do the impossible." - Me

I think the OP is right in the sense that people are going to assume their black classmates are there because of AA (even if unwarranted). I'd hate to be a black person that got a 175 on the LSAT. I'd have a female dog of a time convincing people I was there out of merit

I wouldn't waste a second trying to convince some sorry hater that I deserve to be @ X Law School. The only people I'll worry about are my professors; for them, my work will speak for itself. Any student pathetic enough to waste mental energy on such inconsequential nonsense, such as my supposed "inferiority," will just have to get used to seeing me around. I've already made my decision: I will not share my #s (even if I score a 175 on the JUNE LSAT LOL) with anyone @ my future law school. They'll just have to wonder...or squirm .

You're funny. I think all your posturing is your way of convincing yourself that race based AA is fair. I bet your praying for a good score so you can trumpet it to all who'll listen. P.S. = a 147 on the LSAT.

Oh, dear! Are you still bitter about your failure to penetrate the T6?

Awwwwwww, snap, girlfriend!

I was just giving friendly advice as far as the whole is concerned. Most people who do that tend do be, um, how to put this delicately, mm, let's say, they tend to be somewhat limited in their vocabulary. It would have been more polite to say 'thank you', and never do it again. The crack about the T6 was uncalled for and factually incorrect.

Most people, Eastend? You're one of the most unimpressive posters in this thread, though I give you kudos for being the surliest hypocrite.

And the "crack about the T6"? Now that was appropriate and is in fact correct.

You're one of the most unimpressive posters in this thread, though I give you kudos for being the surliest hypocrite.

You said a very similar thing to Lindbergh and to one of the other anti AA people. We discussed it. I told you to stop the personal attacks, and to stop being such a little female dog.

Insert bitchy reply here - I know you can't help yourself.

So, AA got you into your UG. It's going to get you into a better law school. At what point did you expect to get anywhere solely on your own merits?

You're such a f-ing feminine hygiene product it's almost unfathomable.

Why are you wasting your time flaming your ridiculous opinions on an internet messageboard? Surely you're not interested in a bigger agenda, or worthy discussion, or anything else that seems meaningful. You're here to flame, period. Which makes me think you need a venue to spout your inane opinions because you're too much of a f-ing female private part and/or tool to do it in real life, which also makes me think you're just an insecure little stooge hiding in the back of his or her law school course hoping you're never taken to task for the *&^% you spew.