Dynamical Diagnosis and Solutions for Resilient Natural and Social Systems

Didier Sornette, Tatyana Kovalenko

Abstract

The concept of resilience embodies the quest towards the ability to sustain shocks, to suffer from these shocks as little as possible, for the shortest time possible, and to recover with the full functionalities that existed before the perturbation. We propose an operation definition of resilience, seeing it as a measure of stress that is complementary to the risk measures. Emphasis is put on the distinction between stressors (the forces acting on the system) and stress (the internal reaction of the system to the stressors). This allows us to elaborate a classification of stress measures and of the possible responses to stressors. We emphasize the need for characterizing the goals of a given system, from which the process of resilience build-up can be defined. Distinguishing between exogenous versus endogenous sources of stress allows one to define the corresponding appropriate responses. The main ingredients towards resilience include (1) the need for continuous multi-variable measurement and diagnosis of endogenous instabilities, (2) diversification and heterogeneity, (3) decoupling, (4) incentives and motivations, and (5) last but not least the (obvious) role of individual strengths. Propositions for individual training towards resilience are articulated. The concept of â€œcrisis flight simulatorsâ€ is introduced to address the intrinsic human cognitive biases underlying the logic of failures and the illusion of control, based on the premise that it is only by â€œlivingâ€ through scenarios and experiencing them that decision makers make progress. We also introduce the â€œtime@riskâ€ framework, whose goal is to provide continuous predictive updates on possible scenarios and their probabilistic weights, so that a culture of preparedness and adaptation be promoted. These concepts are presented towards building up personal resilience, resilient societies and resilient financial systems.

Imhof, L. A., D. Fudenberg and M.A. Nowak, Evolutionary cycles of cooperation and defection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (31), 10797-10800 (2005).

Intriligator, M.D., The Role of Institutions in the Transition to a Market Economy, in â€œThe transition to a market economy: Transformation and reform in the baltic statesâ€, T. Haavisto, ed., Edward Elgar Publishing (1997).

Intriligator, M.D., Russia: lessons of the economic collapse, report to the office of the Chief Economist of the

Satinover, J. and D. Sornette, Taming Manias: On the Origins, Inevitability, Prediction and Regulation of Bubbles and Crashes, chapter of the book â€œGovernance and Control of Financial Systems: A Resilience Engineering Perspective,â€ Gunilla SundstrÃ¶m and Erik Hollnagel, eds., (October 2011) published by Ashgate Publishing Group in their Resilience Engineering Perspectives series.

Selye, H. The Evolution of the Stress Concept: The originator of the concept traces its development from the discovery in 1936 of the alarm reaction to modern therapeutic applications of syntoxic and catatoxic hormones. American Scientist 61 (6), 692-699 (1973) (http://www.jstor.org/stable/27844072).

Sornette, D., Optimization of brain and life performance: Striving for playing at the top for the long run, German version published as: "Du kannst dein Leben steigern", in: Schweizer Monat, Dezember 2011/Januar 2012, 38-49. English version published under the title â€œPush for Peak Performanceâ€ at the Schweizer Monat 28 Nov 2011 (http://www.schweizermonat.ch/artikel/push-for-peak-performance); eprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4621.

Sornette, D. and G. Ouillon, editors of the special issue of Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics on â€œDiscussion and debate: from black swans to dragon-kings - Is there life beyond power laws?'', volume 25, Number 1, pp. 1-373 (2012) (http://www.springerlink.com/content/d5x6386kw2055740/?MUD=MP)