First national model for Bovine TB calls for more focus on cattle

July 2, 2014

Credit: Y tambe/Wikipedia

In a study published in Nature this week, a team of researchers based at the University of Warwick has produced the first national model to investigate the bovine TB spread.

The results derived from the model in the Nature paper, entitled "A dynamic model of bovine tuberculosis spread and control in Great Britain", demonstrated that the majority of herd outbreaks are caused by multiple transmissions routes - including failed cattle infection tests, cattle movement and reinfection from environmental reservoirs (infected pastures and wildlife). The study suggests that improved testing, vaccination of cattle and culling all cattle on infected farms would be the most effective strategies for controlling the disease.

Based on a study of cattle and the causes of bTB in Great Britain the model sought to ascertain how and why the epidemic has grown over the past 15 years. Using Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency and Defra data, the researchers developed a mathematical model that incorporated both within-farm and between-farm bTB transmission.

The model proposes that whilst badgers form part of the environmental reservoir they only play a relatively minor role in the transmission of infection.

"Our model offers a dispassionate, unbiased view of the spread of bTB through the cattle industry of Great Britain" says model co-author Professor Matthew Keeling, from Warwick's School of Life Sciences and Department of Mathematics. "The model is based on the recorded pattern of positive and negative tests and uses the known movement of cattle around the country. We aim for it to provide policy

makers with the best evidence possible from which to make decisions relating to bTB and to contribute to the ongoing discussions on this sensitive issue".

The model allowed the researchers to tease apart how different routes involved in transmission interact and overlap. "By using the most recent data our model predicts that it is most likely both cattle movements and the local environment that are driving the front of the epidemic. Imperfect cattle skin tests contribute to the spread by delaying the time until infected herds are detected for the first time and incorrectly identifying herds as clear of infection", says co-author Dr Ellen Brooks-Pollock of the University of Cambridge.

For the researchers one of key results from the model is the large variation in what happens to farms once they are infected. "We found that the vast majority of infected farms don't spread the infection to any other farms before they clear infection themselves. Only a small number of farms spread the infection and they can cause the majority of new cases", argues Dr Brooks-Pollock.

The researchers argue that the findings are essential for improving the targeting control measures. If infected farms can be identified and caught early then it might be possible to make substantial progress in tackling the epidemic.

"The model we are putting forward can be used to address several potential control methods – but there is no single panacea." says Professor Keeling. "All controls have advantages, disadvantages and would be problematic and costly to implement. However, we find only three controls have the power to reverse the current increase in cases; more frequent or more accurate testing, vaccination of cattle and culling all cattle on infected farms".

The control measures the researchers investigated were designed to be 'idealised' control options to understand what measures in theory could stop the increasing epidemic. "We didn't consider the practicalities or economics of implementing control measures", says Dr Brooks-Pollock "that needs to be the subject of further work".

"We believe the way forwards is to determine clearly defined strategic goals with appropriate costs and benefits" argues Professor Keeling. "Models such as ours can then be combined with economic analysis to assess a wide range of future control options".

Related Stories

Each year thousands of cattle are slaughtered to control the spread of bovine tuberculosis. New research reveals that testing misses many animals harbouring the disease and shows that large herds are particularly vulnerable ...

Up to 21% of herds clearing restrictions for bovine Tuberculosis (bTB) in Great Britain may be harbouring infection, according to a study published in PLOS Computational Biology this week. A cross-disciplinary group of experts ...

Respiratory diseases in cattle are a great threat to animal welfare and lead to financial losses in the cattle industry. The bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) is one of the main causes of respiratory disease in cattle. ...

(Phys.org) —Scientists at the University of Liverpool, in collaboration with farming groups and wildlife charities, are investigating the presence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in Cheshire wildlife by testing badgers that ...

Recommended for you

As an National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded entomologist, Virginia Tech's Paul Marek has to spend much of his time in the field, hunting for rare and scientifically significant species. He's provided NSF with an inside ...

Professor Hyun-Gyu Park of the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) has developed a technique to analyze various target DNAs using an aptamer, a ...

Researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago and Northwestern University have engineered a tethered ribosome that works nearly as well as the authentic cellular component, or organelle, that produces all the proteins ...

1 comment

Like so many others, our family paid the roundsman an extra penny per pint for 'Tuberculin Tested Milk'.

Little did us youngsters know our immune systems had been 'primed' by Mum's military-grade BCG vaccinations, then honed by repeated exposure to a nearby family who were carriers.

So, when the dreaded 'claws' challenge came along, my skin flared up. With the interloper stomped, that painful reaction had subsided to 'minimal' by the time we were assessed. Despite my protests, I was given the maximum juvenile dose of BCG. As you'd expect, my immune system 'went nuclear' on the injection site, generating a ghastly, suppurating, ulcerated boil that didn't *quite* keep me off school.

The investigation was quite funny in a morbid kind of way. The two nurses who'd recorded my claws' challenge had to admit they'd not considered inherited immunity, prior exposure or that an adolescent might be a 'reliable observer'.

D'uh...

Please sign in to add a comment.
Registration is free, and takes less than a minute.
Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.