JFK spins in his grave after hearing of “Black Lives Matter”

This is the full transcript of President John F. Kennedy’s speech – taken recently whilst he was spinning in his grave at the sheer horror of a “Black Lives Matter” movement in America:

“My topic tonight is a more sober one of concern to people of all races.

I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks (American police shooting innocent black people, and Texas police allegedly being shot in retaliation) may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years – long before Malcolm X. first uttered those fateful words: “We didn’t land on Plymouth Rock; the Rock landed on us!”, and certainly well before Martin Luther King stated: “All that it takes for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing.” Whatever our hopes may be for the future–for reducing this racial threat or living with it–there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security–a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.

This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to black Americans and to all other Americans–two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for far greater public information (i.e. about racist false-flag events); and, second, to the need for far greater secrecy in the use of derogatory terms – terms which suggest that black people have an inferiority complex – pathetic phrases like “Black Lives Matter” – because who in hell said they didn’t matter, and who cares what that stupid racist idiot thinks anyway?! We’re not going to define our black lives by what some snotty-nosed jerk thinks does or doesn’t matter. Why should we consent and give merit to the idea that black lives need to be debated and scrutinized as to their worth, or how much they “matter” or not? Black lives are lives. Period! What’s all this talk about whether or not such lives “matter” or not? It’s ridiculous to even utter such a racist laden phrase. The fact that black people have been brainwashed into using it, just shows the extent to which the propaganda machine is working against them – obviously the term is part of some racist psy-op to stir hatred between the races in America – To make black people use the language of the racist bigot against themselves, and all the while think that they are fighting for their human rights. What a sly psychological war we have that acclimatises black people into using derogatory terms against their own race! Why don’t they use such terms as “Human Lives Matter”, or simply “Stop Killing Innocents!” Think about what is being implied by such a phrase as “Black Lives Matter”- by singling out the black person as being somehow “different” from simply being human, only reinforces negative attitudes and stereotypes about them. The fact that the luciferian, devil possessed queen of poop Beyoncé is endorsing the “Black Lives Matter” term, should send alarm bells ringing in every non-racist’s brain. Her whole demonic dance act at the Superbowl – in support of this racist term, shows that it was all an illuminati sick plan to begin with – just to stir up racial hatred. Smart people should not be fooled by the demonically possessed “Uncle Toms” of this world. Stop using the derogatory term “black lives matter” and endorsing the inferiority complex that such a term implies. White people would never come up with such a phrase – simply because they see themselves as unquestionably worthy of respect, and in a position of strength – the fact that their “lives matter” is self-evident and doesn’t need to be spoken, or advertised on a placard – because to do so would in itself be demeaning and self-defeatist. It’s like what Malcolm X. says about “Uncle Toms” valuing the life of his master more than he does his own, and losing his identity to the extent that he can only identify himself as a person when with his master, saying: “What’s the matter boss WE sick?” It begs the question: “If white people didn’t exist, would black lives still matter?”

The very words “Black Lives Matter” are repugnant in a free and open, unprejudiced society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to such derogatory terms to refer to black people, to single them out for secret false-flags, and in psy-ops to start a race war. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted derogatory terms to describe black people (along with the concealment of pertinent facts concerning false-flag racial wars) do not outweigh the dangers which are cited to justify it – for example, telling a racist thug that your “black life matters” only makes you look weak, and is likely to embolden the racist thug to challenge you to a fight. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a racist society by pandering to racist restrictions and derogatory racist language, or stereotypes. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our unprejudiced traditions do not survive with it. Imagine the innocent white child in the school playground telling her black peers that their sorry “black lives matter”, then getting the stern reply from them: “Oh yeah, says who?! Who the hell do you think YOU are telling us what to think about our lives?!” And then that poor child then tries to explain that she heard Beyoncé say it, and that’s why she thought it was O.K. to say it. It’s like the word “nigger” – it’s somehow fine for black people to call each other “niggers” (down in “da hood”), but it’s defiantly not O.K. for white people to call black people “niggers” anywhere. Period! It’s the same with the term “black lives matter” – if white people start saying that derogatory racist crap “in da hood”, then they’re just “cruisin’ for a bruisin’”- they’ll be asking for trouble in a black neighbourhood – no matter how innocently it is said by them, it will still appear condescending and mocking of the black community. And then there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to capitalise on the aftermath of such a racist phrase (i.e. in a false-flag event) – used in the black community to stroke racial tensions – the police state will use such tensions to implement the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know – Just please stop behaving like bloody racist “Uncle Toms” damn it!! Stop using the racist’s derogatory language against yourselves – wake up and smell the psychological warfare. Think – damn it! Why do I have to spell this out to you all? Have you been so demoralised that such demeaning phrases, with obvious racist undertones as “black lives matter” seem fine to you?! It’s like you’ve all been sent for training in Israel along with the entire U.S. police force! What are we now to rewrite all our fairy-tale books with such pathetic words, just to appear politically correct: “Once upon a time, when black lives mattered…”, or should we rewrite our history books: “In the year 2016, when black lives started to matter… Let me tell you a little story about a black life that mattered… I’ve got a whole bag of black lives that matter, just like I’ve got one with your name on it…Knock, knock, who’s there? – A black life that matters…” – Give me a friggin’ break! Does no-one else see the racist stupidity of this demonically inspired “Black Lives Matter” phrase, uttered by the possessed Beyoncé when she was drunk on luciferian fake ‘love’. It’s like I’m taking friggin’ crazy pills!

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to re-examine his own moral/ethical/unbiased standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In a time of racist disinformation, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent stupid racist terms which pander to the prejudiced enemy. In time of “clear and present danger,” the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for less ridiculous racial phrases – uttered by ‘Whores of Babylon’ like Beyoncé. And who the hell made Snoop Dogg the spokesperson for black people when police get shot in Texas anyway?! – Is this a friggin’ joke! Oh so a gangster black rap artist is all the illuminati could find to speak up for black people, and tell them that their sorry black asses matter?! It’s enough to make a black person turn white, or a white person turn black. I’m JFK rollin’ in my grave right now – I was white when they buried me but now I’m as black as coal. That’s what politics does to you. I’m infuriated by all the sneaky racist language that’s freely being used in the media today, and all the self-defeatist propaganda that’s peddled against the black person.

Today no war has been declared–and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions and a change in the use of racist language –by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper – and certainly by every black person with any self-worth at all – who doesn’t have a deeply engrained need for people to think that they somehow “matter” – just because of their own self-imposed inferiority complex – no doubt born from a Beyoncé, demonic, illuminati inspired psy-op to make them think “we are not worthy, we are not worthy….” For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless racist conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day, or ridiculous racist phrases such as “black lives matter”. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient propaganda machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations – as well as demonically possessed Superbowl ‘Whores of Babylon’ – like Beyoncé dancing her black magic “black lives matter” illuminati satanic ritual.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed, no ridiculously racist anti-human term is left unspoken. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security–and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring (through our newspapers) racist information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation’s covert preparations to counter the enemy’s covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning – but even they were seduced into using the language of the ‘Whore of Babylon’ – terms like “black lives matter”!! Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such an overtly derogatory racist phrase. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security, or basic common sense and human decency – or polite decent language and discourse ordinarily used in civilised, unprejudiced society. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted – tests to see if they are all still human, or if they all just mindless moronic racist presstitutes?

The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration – Basically, if you use the phrase “Black Lives Matter” one more time, in any of your news articles from now on, then that just shows what a racist, bigot, scallywag you truly are – so you can stop hiding behind such a seemingly innocent phrase – just to disguise the fact that you think black people are beneath you, and only have worth when you say that they do – because black people and unprejudiced people everywhere (that are colour blind) know your game and what you’re about.

On many earlier occasions, I have said–and your newspapers have constantly said–that these are times that appeal to every citizen’s sense of sacrifice and self-discipline and self-worth. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.

I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news, or to limit the use of racist, derogatory, self-defeatist language in news publications. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or any new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to re-examine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.

Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: “Is it news?” All I suggest is that you add the question: “Is it in the interest of national security?” Is it racist terminology dressed up as a sweet old granny’s words – like seemingly sweet and innocent words like “Black Lives Matter” – whilst all the while implying that they don’t matter – until the racist big, bad wolf in sheep’s clothes shows his true colours, or the black American military war chickens come home to roost. And I hope that every group in America–unions and businessmen and public officials at every level—regardless of race or colour, will ask the same question of their endeavours, and subject their actions to the same exacting tests, and expose their own deep-seated racist assumptions and prejudices.

And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary disregard of derogatory terms like “Black Lives Matter” – that only reinforce stereotypes and fuel an inferiority complex amongst black people, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations.

Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.

It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation–an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people–to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well–the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers–I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: “An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it.” We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed–and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment– the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply “give the public what it wants”–but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news–for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security, and the limits of ridiculous racist, self-defeatist phrases like “Black Lives Matter” (- as dreamed up by delusional, egotistical mental midgets that seek to divide humanity into a ‘black verses white’, ‘us’ verses ‘them’ mentality) –and we intend to do it.

It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world’s efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.

And so it is to the printing press–to the recorder of man’s deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news–that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent – and not a racist bigot, using such meaningless, snide, condescending, pathetic phrases as “Black Lives Matter” to supposedly empower the black person – can this phrase empower black people to at least feel good about themselves, without feeling like their someone else’s bitch to be told when and where their sorry black lives matter? My fragrant big fat American white ass it can!!