Never mind that just 30 years ago, in the early days of AIDS, thousands of innocent women, children and men died of AIDS from infected blood transfusions. Dozens of medical workers in blood donation centers contracted the disease from contact with contaminated blood.

Gay activists have effectively suppressed the fact that HIV and syphilis has been on the increase among the US male homosexual population.

Comparing 2008 to 2010, the number of new HIV infections among gays increased 12% from 26,700 in 2008 to 29,800 (95% CI: 26,200-33,500) in 2010, with a 22% increase among gays aged 13-24 from 7,200 (95% CI: 6,100-8,300) in 2008 to 8,800 (95% CI: 7,500-10,100) in 2010. Although gays represent about 7% of the male population in the United States, in 2010 homosexuals accounted for 78% of the new HIV infections among males.

SAFE SEX POLITICALLY INCORRECT

Homosexuals are not consistently using 'safe sex' for two reasons.

First, it's "no fun" as I heard one homosexual prostitute put it. Two, homosexual sex thrives on thrills - they get off on extremes and excess.

Homosexual 'cruising' rides on high risk. Is somebody that snorts crystal meth and uses 'poppers' to have anal sex with strangers during 2-3 day binges going to stop to say, 'excuse me, may I see your last HIV test results please?'. or, 'pardon me - hold on while I replace this broken condom'.

"According to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (LADPH), workers in the adult film industry are ten times more likely to be infected with a sexually transmitted disease than members of the population at large." And that's in spite of constant testing. You simply can't sustain a 'risk free' promiscuous sodomite 'lifestyle'.

The power elite's 'Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD)' is handling the publicity campaign. Events, crowds, demonstrations: the usual generation of non-events for media to saturate television, radio and press.

This is typical of Gay social "justice" by which "equality" means everybody has to share the risk of the sexual Russian roulette of the 'gay lifestyle'.I will be accused of libel for saying this - but there are some at the top of the ACLU and GLAAD whose agenda is to bring heterosexual HIV infection figures on par with the gay population. This is precisely the only way to do that.

How to protect your family and yourself from risking contaminated transfusions in a health emergency? Talk with your local blood banks about donating and having your own blood saved for yourself. Innocent people WILL be infected by this - and that will be suppressed by Media too.

HIV testing on the other hand isn't as conclusion and carries risk of infection though blood transfusion. All medical agencies dealing with HIV know that tests and 'safe sex' aren't failsafe. The Aids Healthcare Foundation has said that "self-policing and testing alone do not work".

Ask any city clinic nurse, especially in ER's that people leading sex addict lives with many contacts per week don't just increase risk of STD's but a host of other diseases. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/hcai-iamss/tti-it/ttdi-eng.php

I just donated blood last Sunday. There's a lot more than sex history to be disqualified. There are several other risk factor questions. The point is that the ban on 'gay blood' is in no way based upon bigotry. Nobody in the medical community dares confront GLAAD to say, "are you calling us bigots and liars?"

That's just not the case. Anyone alive in the 80's knows a lot of innocent people including nurses and blood lab techs died of AIDS from contact with infected blood.

Before AIDS, medical and dental personnel didn't even have to wear rubber gloves.

Comments for "Bad Blood: The Gay Drive to Donate"

Steven said (July 19, 2013):

The real issue here apart from the true criminality of homosexuality is the donation and use of a real or potentially infectious bodily fluid and putting that fluid into a heterosexual person who is not or may not be infected by any dangerous pathogen. Gay blood must be considered a real or potential bioweapon and its use against heterosexuals ought to be considered genocide under Article 2 parts b and c.

If the genocide convention was intended to protect criminals and perverts it is clear that it needs to be amended or repealed.

Steven

Article 2

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

·
(a) Killing members of the group;

· (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

· (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

· (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

· (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Eliezer said (July 19, 2013):

A legalized homosexism is what you get when the moral melting pot the western world was founded to be, is supplanted by the Subjective Greek Theory and a bastardization of "multi-culturalism" -- in real terms meaning an oxymoronic "moral pluralism," by which immorality is enabled, empowered & imposed under a nefarious guise of science.

Thank you Kinsey! It is indeed ludicrous a sexual psychopath whose specialty was insect taxidermy, would be embellished with a title of "father" of the American sexual revolution.

The homosexist movement has from its emergence been a moral, not a scientific issue. This was the achievement of Alfred Kinsey, that with financing and "moral" support from the Rockefeller Foundation he should be able to engineer a scientific pretext for a supplanting of the sexual foundations of western civilization, also conjuring a weaponization of human sexuality for cultural as well as political disassembly. The gay rights movement at its apex, has never been about human rights and social tolerance, but about political power, eugenics and an abrogation of sensible, normal "human" affectations and even natural rights.

As long as healthy male/female role models, and a complimentary psycho-sexual gender patterning remains absent from our culture, the homo-erotic dysfunction will to varying degrees continue to produce pathology.

That a pathology is legally "normalized" is counter-intuitive. There is no genetic predisposition to the injury or indignity of buggery. The focus of human sexual affectations is shaped by environmental and sociological factors, as well as environmental expectations. Gay blood is without moral currency.

Often, the only thing which restrains humanity from the abyss are moral boundaries. In this, science alone is not only useless, but anathema.

Hugo Vance said (July 18, 2013):

I hope this article keeps some people from going along with it where they live. I seem to be the last person I know here that hasn't gone silent on it.

Many of the women have actually jumped on the band wagon. TV has been giving them a phoney profile of 'cute' homosexuals for years. I asked of of these women recently if she's thought of what homosexuals do and she said 'that's not any of my business!' That, coming from women with young grandsons.

Just another demonstration of the black arts of manufacturing consent.

JG said (July 18, 2013):

Years ago in Cuba if you had AIDS you were quarantined from the general population for the protection and welfare of the nation. Congratulations Fidel Castro!

America has become a haven and slave to the Godless Doctrine of Political Correctness enforced and authored by the Anti-Traditional American legal institutions such as the ACLU and the SPLC.

America's demise has been the direct result of not recognizing these organizations as the subversive entities that they are, as they once did 50 years ago.

The "end game"of the institutions is the eradication of your "free will".

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at