> Gaming as an addiction isn’t the only thing that appeared in the ICD-11 beta draft for the World Health Organization’s upcoming update for listings of international diseases. According to Eurogamer, they recently spotted another new addition to the draft, this time including “hazardous gaming”.

> The entry is under factors that influence health status or require contact with health services, and is situated within the category of “Problems associated with health behaviors”. The entry in the ICD-11 beta draft reads…

< “Hazardous gaming refers to a pattern of gaming, either online or offline that appreciably increases the risk of harmful physical or mental health consequences to the individual or to others around this individual. The increased risk may be from the frequency of gaming, from the amount of time spent on these activities, from the neglect of other activities and priorities, from risky behaviours associated with gaming or its context, from the adverse consequences of gaming, or from the combination of these. The pattern of gaming is often persists in spite of awareness of increased risk of harm to the individual or to others.”

> The Entertainment Software Association chimed in to offer their take on the World Health Organization adding two entries for gaming into the ICD-11 draft, with a representative telling GamesIndustry.biz that they’re encouraging WHO to reverse course…

< “Just like avid sports fans and consumers of all forms of engaging entertainment, gamers are passionate and dedicated with their time. Having captivated gamers for more than four decades, more than 2 billion people around the world enjoy video games. The World Health Organization knows that common sense and objective research prove video games are not addictive. And, putting that official label on them recklessly trivializes real mental health issues like depression and social anxiety disorder, which deserve treatment and the full attention of the medical community. We strongly encourage the WHO to reverse direction on its proposed action.”

> There’s a part of the industry that’s afraid this could negatively impact gaming as a whole, with more restrictions and possible government scrutiny being brought down for additional regulation. However, there’s nothing indicating right now that such a event will take place. Others, however, don’t seem to mind it all that much.

> The additions to the WHO drafts were lobbied for by Asian countries, and it’s been known that South Korea has been aggressively pursuing adding video games as a form of addition given that they consider it one of the four evils of their society, despite e-sports and MMOs being some of the biggest exports from the country.

> There’s really no telling if the draft will go through, but there have already been some members close to the organization of the draft who have basically stated that the entries are a lock, which will be finalized for the 2018 report.

- Asian countries are pushing it to try and neuter a billion dollar industry in the west. They know it won't kill it, but they have a little less competition when they sell games using engines & studios they own (darn fun China is now being more open to foreign vidya, and showing off their work. It's like if alcohol or smokes were gonna have more severe health warnings, and China started showing off all their booze and tobacco)

- The fact even the ESA is trying to push back from this- a group who did jack shit for lootbox gambling- means they're fucking scared.

- The "hazardous gaming" could be wildly abused. (A) Taking behavior that is deemed bad due to SJW and claiming gaming caused it. and (B) Taking assholes that do bad things and happen to play games, and claim the game caused it. All so the "media changes your mind" argument can appeal to the authority of the World Health Organization.

> This man has racist opinions and plays a videogame where it is possible to kill non-white people. Clearly the game made him do it, since he's a "Gaming Addict" who did "Hazardous Gaming." (Even if the WHO says the games aggravated an existing psychological issue, the SJW and other enemies of gaming can twist it to claim the games came first.

> This man killed a person. He played videogames, so he must have been a "Gaming Addict" (even if the WHO only claim it is possible he was an addict but don't know due to lack of evidence, it can be twisted).

In short- anyone doing something bad can be claimed to be a gamer, as anyone with a PC, internet connection, or smartphone can play something.

- Makes devs scared to put certain mechanics into games, fearing bad PR if a nutcase does do something. 99.999% of your audience well adjusted people? Doesn't matter. The MSM will run stories on that individual to run your company into the ground (sort of what they tried to do with D&D and the sewer murders, but to no effect). Maybe a politician will even call for a ban on a game that's recently been mentioned for brownie points with certain voters. Even if it doesn't pass, more bad PR, less investors, less creative freedom for fear of being branded a maniac creator.

So, less sexy things because a rapist played your game- no matter how long or how often (or if the box was planted in his home). Less combat because a murderer had an internet search history showing he looked up the game's trailers and gameplay. He didn't actually play it- but that's how bad gaming is guys!

With the whole intel thing slowly blowing up, does anyone here have a clear date where their processors have the backdoor bug? I got an old ass emachine from the early 2000's with linux on it and I was wondering whether the atom inside of it has the bug. The thread for the topic is really no help.

IMO, dealing with WHO is like dealing with Youtube/Google. Both have mammoth warchests, but are deathly afraid of bad PR and the money fountain slowing down.

Possible plans of action:

> Dig and Create infographs mocking and informing the public. Put them in ALL gaming related hashtags and ALL mental health related hashtags. Don't play nice, get in people's faces about it. The goal of this is to reduce volunteer donations, and cause bad PR internationally- until it becomes a talking point amongst politicians.

< Infograph (A) - Anti-Chinese. Show evidence of Chinese lobbying for gaming addiction, and how their own "treatment centers" end up killing people- all the while buying out Unreal 4, and trying to get their games into the west. Paint it as China trying to kill their competition in an underhanded way. Then anti-China hype is still big amongst US patriots and Trump supporters.

< Infograph (B) - Defamation. Expose the biggest fuck-ups the WHO have made on mental health before, their own staff being hypocritical, and/or money being a bigger motivator than actual health. People only trust faceless organizations because they know nothing about them. Make it a talking point, and it'll become memetic to hate that group- much like the excessive health & safety regulations of the EU (and far worse crimes in recent history).

< Infograph (C) - History. Show how other hobbies have had psychos pinned to them by a busybody politician or body, and it didn't stick due to overwhelming common sense; sick people will do sick things, sane people won't. Then draw comparisons to what the WHO are doing now. This appeals to gamers (old and new) and those who might have other reasons to loathe those pinning shit they didn't do onto them.

< Infograph (D) - Anti-SJW. While it'd be preaching to our own, a lot of people are turning against the hard left whackjobs. Show how they've been going after gaming, and how the WHO's decision could mean that instead of claiming gaming makes you crazy, that everyone who games is already crazy. Not to mention the violation of freedom and danger it proposes to brand someone as insane because they like something. Appeals to the right, pro-trump; and as it says, anti-SJW.

< Infograph (E) - Slippry Slope. Show them how South Korea and China deals with Gaming Addiction. The social pariah it makes you, how it affects your credit score, how it affects your chances at a job, and how those who are "treated" go through hell. It's not fear mongering, it's a possibility. If smokers and drinkers are less likely to get organ transplants, why shouldn't other "soft" vices also have some restrictions. Clearly, anyone who games is a waste of a human being. Appeals to gamers and those who have been falsely branded over addictions or obsessions they didn't have.

> Request your government ask about it, and explain your concerns. A politician will say and even do whatever they believe will give them votes or PR. So give them a story they can run with- big bad WHO trying to brand healthy patriotic consumers as insane because they enjoy their hobby. You're not asking for them not to do it, but they need careful guidance to ensure they don't over-step their mark. After all, they wouldn't want the whole US/European/[your country here] gaming industry to collapse and harm the economy. BAM, you've told them it's pro freedom, pro consumer, pro economy, and they don't have to stop it, they just have to make demands and wag their finger- all bad PR for WHO again. Call/email your senator or equivalent.

> Request Youtubers you like cover this topic. A short video is easier to pass around, and something about videos just makes fuckers click it rather than read an article or text on an image. If they spoke against SJW, bad game journos, or for artistic freedom- odds are that'll be good. But don't be afraid to try big youtubers as well. The more eyes we get on this the better, right now it's only known to a limited part of the gaming community. If you get someone like DeFranco or PewDiePie, then it blows up too fast for WHO to effectively PR, as people ask stuff. And hasty answers can be used to hang them later.

Thinking of how pozzed Steven King was even back them makes me ill because "of course" the leader of the good tribe of Aspen shitstain Colorado is a female black blind geriatric all-wise magical negress (he should have made her lesbian to hit all those proto-wokeness checkmarks) and "of course" the leader of the bad tribe is a Cis White Male in Las Vegas.

The book meanders forever and King seems to fucking just forget where the plot is after 20 more pages of back-story flash back before going into another flashback in the flashback.

uggg >>14087545 nigger you have no idea. The book was a horrible boring slog back when I was 15, but I wouldn't let it's terribleness beat me (I had a similar take with first Legacy of Kain, the 2D one, on the PS1).

https://archive.is/OJYw8 Guardian tries to muddy the water, by citing examples of electroshock therapy, then the camp their focusing on being a lot "softer". It fails, as the place still has military style training (a big "eek" factor for normalfags). The bootcamp runner is a former soldier nicknamed "the evil godfather". The initial paragraph about the parents tricking and abandoning their kid is especially heart-rending.

https://archive.is/j1ORW Another take on a teen dying less than 48 hours after entering. It seems beatings are administered. Even if the person is rightfully upset, do they beat a teenager like they'd beat a trained soldier who is physically fit? In any case, the Government shuts then down, tells others not to do it, then carry on and (presumably) build more.

https://archive.is/mQ4PF Another take on the same story as above. Pushing China's hypocrisy (investing in games, yet pushing these prison camps and for the WHO to make the world follow suit) could be a gold-mine. IF we can show China encouraged the UN to do the same. I'm not talking bribes or lobbying (though if you find it- great!) but stuff like a politician making a speech asking the WHO to do it. Not surprisingly, you may need knowledge of Chinese.

https://archive.is/y4hTD Chinese Military plays to much Honor For Kings - (a game soon to be on the Switch). It helps muddy the waters further. If the Chinese Government can't stop their own trained soldiers from playing, what hope do they have for teenagers and children? Were the soldiers actually addicted? Do they treat the teenagers and children the same way they'd treat the soldiers? If Nintendo show off Honor For Kings (called Arena of Valor in the EU and US), then be sure to fill the game's hashtag with all the info on what China do to people who play it.

Well, the ones that were confirmed were silently removed, according to Reddit. There are about two dozen more accused that aren't confirmed.

>Isn't MTG a children's card game?

Most card games are considered that, which makes it a bit more damning. Also, WotC confirmed that they don't do background checks of any sort, which is pretty fucking illegal for organized competitions anywhere remotely civilized.

>They know it won't kill it, but they have a little less competition when they sell games using engines & studios they own

There's one thing that's puzzling me about this…

WON'T THIS EFFECT THEIR BOTTOM LINE OF ALSO MAKING MONEY OFF OF WESTERN GAMERS?!?

As was pointed around during Spring of last year, Japanese games are flourishing in the West while Western games are bombing. Also, won't this end up destroying the gaming scenes in the fighting, MOBA, RTS, FPS, speedrunning, and e-sports communities, and hurt companies who make money off of those customers? If anything, 'ALL companies should be on panic alert, not just those in the West.

1-1 on Vs. isn't even when shit gets real in the arcade port. At least go by 4-1 when a Paratroopa and pit is placed where your muscle memory spot to land from a running jump lays. I did get a kick out of watching someone stream the game, the streamer only recalling the game as a kid. I laughed at every "gotcha" moment that he landed

>Moments after going live with Cernovich and Lou Colagiovanni about the Pedophile scandal in MTG, an organized mass flagging campaign takes The Quartering's main channel and all claims/evidence offline.

Is it me or is /newsplus/ getting raided by a bunch of shillary goons? I was just over there wanting to shitpost about Trump's tweet, but a whole bunch of drumph posters are spamming any thread related to Trump

> “I have considerable concerns about this proposed diagnosis,” said Dr. Chris Ferguson, a psychologist who studies the effects of consistent game-playing. Ferguson is one voice in the sizable backlash against the WHO’s draft. He explained that, early in psychologists’ debates about gaming addiction, some compared apparent victims’ compulsive behaviors to substance abusers’. Ferguson thinks that was their first mistake.

> The push to pathologize gaming, he believes, is based off misguided comparisons to heroin or cocaine addiction: “There are many myths such as that games involve dopamine and brain regions similar to substance abuse,” Ferguson said. “There’s a kernel of truth to that but only insofar as any pleasurable activity activates these regions. How gaming involves them is more similar to other fun activities like eating chocolate, having sex, getting a good grade, etc., not heroin or cocaine.”

> University of Oxford psychologist Andrew Przybylski echoed Ferguson’s concerns, adding that “It’s a very bad idea.” He’s concerned that most studies done on gaming addiction are low quality. Codifying gaming addiction as a tried and true disorder could risk “stigmatising millions of players and may divert limited mental health resources from core psychiatric problems such as depression or anxiety which might be at the heart of problematic play,” he said over e-mail.

> Both Ferguson and Przybylski acknowledge that some people overdo gaming at the expense of their health and sanity. What’s worth focusing on, they say, is less the “gaming” aspect of that behavior, but the “overdoing” aspect. The impetus to approach something compulsively might matter more than what that “something” is. Research they’ve done and read suggests that what looks like gaming disorder, a lot of the time, is a symptom of depression, anxiety or attention deficit disorder. The WHO’s definition of gaming disorder could inspire an inaccurate diagnosis when, in fact, gaming could just be a coping mechanism for something already known.

> “It doesn’t appear to be a stable construct,” Ferguson explained.

> Last year, dozens of psychologists, including Ferguson, penned a grave article [https://archive.is/bBTqQ] in response to the WHO’s proposal to list gaming disorder. Declaring that the proposal had “fundamental issues” like poor research quality and a lack of consensus, the paper warned that a rushed decision could have bad consequences. It could contribute to a stigma around gaming that affects healthy gamers. It could also waste public health resources spurred by an echo of the ‘90s moral panic around games.

Okay, sent off an email to Nichegamer about it with a link to the thread on /gamergatehq/. Could someone who has a Twitter handle see about passing this info to RedGamingTech: twitter.com/redgamingtech

It's not wrong. The DX port has some nice additions and tweaks. If only the screen crunch didn't effect so much of the jumps, especially the Lost Levels' portion (which lost some of its added appeal in the port with the lack of wind and 9~D)

Could you post it? Is he really defending pedos? I know how he shit talked people and fans who proved the claims against unsleeved media were bullshit, and he doubled down by banning pro players permanently for defending unsleeved media.

This is showing how fucking corrupt a lot of the /tg/ companies are becoming. Fantasy Flight stole work and kicked out problematic people while shit talking the 40k IP they worked on. Green Ronin did the same to some content creators which is why the guy behind Mutants and Masterminds left them. Some of the original creators for battle tech and shadowrun tried to push SJW bullshit and sperged out at fans who called him out on it. Everything is shit.

>North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the “Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.” Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!

I actually wonder if a disassembly of Deluxe could be modified to make the screen not so small and port the wind back in. I'm mainly bringing this up because I remember some Anon using a disassembly to make a widescreen 3DS port of Pokemon Red, but I don't remember what came of that.

>I will be announcing THE MOST DISHONEST & CORRUPT MEDIA AWARDS OF THE YEAR on Monday at 5:00 o’clock. Subjects will cover Dishonesty & Bad Reporting in various categories from the Fake News Media. Stay tuned!

>WON'T THIS EFFECT THEIR BOTTOM LINE OF ALSO MAKING MONEY OFF OF WESTERN GAMERS?!?

My only other assumption is:

> China's quality of life sucks, and the government does not want to improve it.

> China makes money from knock offs & clones, but even their own people are pirating US games. Even tangential knowledge that the west makes better games is bad for them (despite most believing the US rips of China).

> People play games non-stop because their lives are shit. How can China sell games AND stop their own people not working?

> If China won't improve their QoL, they can reduce others. Pushing "gaming addiction"- they can punish it in their own country, then force everyone else to do the same via "ha ha no cheap labor for you if you don't do as we say." on top of the usual palm greasing and blackmail.

> It fucks over gaming world-wide. Except China. China doesn't give a fuck what foreigners do. They demand terms for everyone else then never follow them. They still made their money while they were selling games (and some of that probably funded the gaming addiction push), but now if someone from China does peak outside the curtain- the quality of life outside isn't that different anymore. They don't have fun games or interesting websites, just TV & Movies. And since most movies are now being released in China (once they're localized of course), there is no difference to living in the US to China. Why learn English and move there? Stay in China. Work and make babies.

Of course, the simpler explanation is it's S.Korea experimentation now being applied to other nations. Can a medium of creativity and free expression be demonized and killed? If so, how fast? People then flood to other forms of entertainment and they become demonized. No entertainment for us, while they build kiddy rape palaces.

Still, no matter the (((who))) or why- the outcome is the same, and should be fought harshly. It doesn't matter if your enemy is shooting himself in the foot to pull it off, if anything that's more of a warning how hell-bent they are to do it.

> This embed has got you covered for most of that. The only problem is that it presents it too much from a "conspiracy" and "horror"direction.

> Well, whatever evidence there was got nuked by the "nothing to see here" crowd with this recent mass-flagging.

And this is another reason why "go watch my youtube video that just got taken down" is not good enough for documenting events. We need writeups and they need to be in public places where people can see them. It's good to have videos and images on top of that, but you gotta start with the basics.

Going to gaming conventions with a sign above your head will probably get you kicked out and branded a crazy.

IMO:

- Organize a protest near the tournament/convention.

- Actually co-ordinate with police so that you are in a place you can legally gather. I.e. X feet from the building and all that. Use that to repel any staff that tell you to leave. It also means when they call the cops, all they'll get is "we said they could" or the cops turn up and you present your permit.

- Resist dogwhistling, record everything, cry assault the second they touch you (it's the same game they play and you then have the law on your side).

OP Timber never even got started. All that hard work translating and no one sent out anything. We needed a group effort on it and fuck all happened. Now Devs are jumping onto the Switch and have no idea what Treehouse is like. I think Treehouse is even getting a Podcast called "Nintendo Power"- even run by the old editor IIRC. It's OP Korean BBQ and OP Paperfire all over again.

I blame myself for not being autistic enough to keep shouting at you all to do it.

>But even aside from all of that, Dr. Ferguson argues the science just doesn’t back up the WHO’s conclusion:

<Many of the “symptoms” proposed (particularly for the DSM version) are kind of normal stuff that many studies suggest aren’t really good predictors of problems. There’s also data suggesting the whole concept of “video game addiction” isn’t really stable and tends to go away by itself over time without treatment.

>The concern lies in the history of using classifications of mental illness as a weapon against groups and individuals by countries’ governments. Over 6,000 people in China — most of them teenagers — have been treated with actual electroshock therapy just because they were thought to have used the Internet too much. China also has a long history of committing whistleblowers and other dissidents to psychiatric “care” for the crime of disagreement. The subject is extensively covered in the 2002 book Dangerous Minds: Political Psychiatry in China Today and Its Origins in the Mao Era, published by Human Rights Watch.

>Richard J. Bonnie’s paper “Political Abuse of Psychiatry in the Soviet Union and in China: Complexities and Controversies,” published in The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law in 2002, also paints a picture of just how convenient it can be for the powerful to leverage psychological diagnoses in order to silence those who disagree. He explains that such practices are “uniformly understood to be a particularly pernicious form of repression,” citing examples in which “psychatric diagnosis was essentially an exercise of social power.” By way of example, Bonnie explains:

<Under applicable laws of Russia and the other former Soviet Republics, a person charged with a crime could be subjected to “custodial measures of a medical nature” if the criminal act was proved and the person was found “nonimputable” due to mental illness.7 Nonimputable offenders could be placed in maximum security hospitals (the notorious “special hospitals”) or in ordinary hospitals, depending on their social dangerousness. All the persons interviewed by the delegation had been found nonimputable and socially dangerous and confined in special hospitals after criminal proceedings that deviated substantially from the general requirements specified in Soviet law. Typically, the patients reported that they had been arrested, taken to jail, taken to a hospital for forensic examination, and then taken to another hospital under a compulsory treatment order, without ever seeing an attorney or appearing in

<The delegation found that there was no clinical basis for the judicial finding of nonimputability in 17 of these cases. In fact, the delegation found no evidence of mental disorder of any kind in 14 cases. It is likely that these individuals are representative of many hundreds of others who were found nonimputable for crimes of political or religious dissent in the Soviet Union, mainly between 1970 and 1990.

>And with regard to China:

<Munro’s research indicates, convincingly in my view, that the Soviet system of forensic psychiatry was transplanted to China during the 1950s and 1960s, thereby placing a small subset of psychiatrists at the intersection of criminal prosecution and psychiatric confinement, and importing a smoothly oiled process by which psychiatrists found that most offenders referred for assessment lacked criminal responsibility and committed them for treatment without any adjudication or judicial oversight. Eventually, in the 1980s, China also established a system of maximum-security forensic hospitals (Ankang), modeled after the Soviet “special hospitals,” for confining offenders who present a “social danger.”

>But lest you think that more open societies are immune to this insidious form of manipulation, consider our own messy history of psychiatric abuse. In 2010, a police officer was involuntarily committed to a psychiatric ward for attempting to reveal what he said was the truth about falsified crime rate statistics. He was eventually paid $600,000 in a settlement by the City of New York after filing a $50 million human rights violation suit. Our foster care system stuffs victimized children full of psychotropic drugs in a thinly veiled attempted to make them easier to handle. Schizophrenia was allegedly used to deliberately hamper the rise of civil rights. Barry Goldwater was publicly crucified for his conservative views by a team of psychiatrists who disagreed with him politically; the Goldwater Rule still exists because attacking someone’s mental fitness is such a potent weapon.

>In supporting diagnoses that are nebulous and unproven, the World Health Organization is giving its tacit approval of an arguably unscientific diagnosis with endless potential for abuse around the world. At best, it could be an easy platform upon which to medicate individuals instead of identifying actual behavioral issues. At worst, it could be one more tool — easily applied to just about any connected citizen — for silencing the inconvenient.

>Please use this to contact us. Or at humorlessrants@gmail.com. Eventually someone will respond. Unless you are a Nazi. Then you get ignored until time for punching.

>As a Democratic activist and a host of a political podcast, I have keen interest in the current situation of the Democratic Party.

>How Men Can Support Women Who Are Being Harassed

<As the latest revelations of the extent to which GamerGate-related harassment and intimidation of women online were coordinated at the highest levels of right wing and even mainstream media organizations reverberate throughout social media, many men who like to think of themselves as allies, and who are not themselves overflowing with misogyny, are left to wonder how they can be useful to their female friends who find themselves the subject of harassment that has become all too ubiquitous. Below are some useful tips and reminders for male allies.

<1. Believe Women: Don’t Fall Into Gaslighting.

<2. Remember That Women Are Better At Detecting Misogyny Than Men.

<3. Write, “I think you’re right,” in Comments sections of articles, Facebook postings etc. of feminist women. Whether or not they’ve been harassed or attacked, agree with them and do so publicly.

<7. Watch for “professional trolls” from the “Men’s Rights” or “Father’s Rights” groups. They will often use terms such as “misandry” and refer to the feminist movement as anti-male or the domestic violence movement as an “industry.”

<8. Send supportive emails, letters, candygrams, etc. to feminist women. Thank them for the good work they are doing–not just when they are targets of online harassment, but all the time.

<10. If the perpetrator isn’t an individual but a company, boycott the company. Write negative reviews of it on “Yelp” or other review sites, or suggest policy or legislative changes. (See the Ecological Model for Social Change for the philosophy behind this.)

This faggot has raped at least fifty women. I'd bet my favorite shirt on it. But the fucking instant I was engaged him, ONE TWEET after he spent however long shitting on #GG supporters and arguing in the chat, bam, I got hit. It wasn't three minutes. Also hilarious is that I filed an appeal a while afterward and the fags reset the clock on my account. They set it back to 12 hours from 9 and some change just to fuck with me for appealing it.

I'd tell Twitter go fuck off and just start using Gab fulltime, but I need it for Project Alexandria for the time being, so I'm stuck in the naughty box.

If OP Dicktionairy is still active- yes. Goolag especially due to the size of the enemy and what it can do.

Never link /pol/ to GGHQ. Some of them hate us like poison, and the shills use it as an excuse to spark up board wars and stifle discussion. They know where we are. Present them the info and let them make their own call about it- they do them, we do us, and we can copy from each other's posts by lurking.

Do we co-ordinate on one per week, or do we allow a more natural flow.

The former means it will get noticed, and we can discuss if it's a good idea to send it to certain people (Kamiya won't be on board, since Bayonetta is untouched)- but it can be annoying to them to have lots of people "spamming" messages to them and they might ignore or reject it thinking it's an anti-Nintendo shill.

The latter means it won't get noticed (NoA can't run interference if they don't know) and the devs might come across it more naturally out of curiosity… Or they'll ignore it. The Japanese text should catch their eye.

Looking into them, I think it'll be swept under the rug by bigger cases. But presenting the cover up (mass reporting) might pique their intrests. You can only try: http://waynefdn.org/contact-us/Send them evidence, not just a story. A guy complaining he got Youtube banned is not evidence, these two videos are:

>made everyone has memory-holed the fact that NK has been proliferating nuclear weapons for the past decade while the UN sat on their hands about it and did nothing

>Everyone has already forgotten that NK threatened the West Coast while Obama was in office and we prepped our anti-ballistic systems just in case they really did try it (they didn’t because whoopty fucking doo)

>Everyone thinks this started recently and it started because Trump bullies NK

>As if having a nuclear hissy fit is a perfectly rational response to shitposting

>Everyone thinks we can die at any day and NK will end us all

<What is deterrence?

Also, anyone notice how the left is just anti anything Trump supports? The latest thing with Israel was fucking hilarious. Suddenly, the world stood against Israel and Jerusalem’s recognition as a capital.

It would also be good to spread this stuff everywhere and send emails to companies. The major thing I have noticed is that people will be against the censorship, but then freak out since they retweeted the wrong people or the wrong people are against censorship. So then these faggots support censorship. I even saw people who said stuff about Fates now defend censorship since it gets back at those dirty gators. Sending emails as individual consumers would work better. What if we did a mass letter with many different social media accounts tied to it?

>People are now reposting mombots translations onto other twitter accounts since they thinks she is icky so now people don't have to browse that account.

>That gaijingoombah sperg retweeted a post shit talking mombot as gross, so now people are calling him out.

I think a major issue is that the PR and the localizers try to talk down the allegations and try to interpret them incorrectly for the people. Some japanese devs are cucks though. The writer and creator of the xenoblade series tried to justify censorship many times before but then changed tunes a little after people decided to not buy the game and told them that.

I thought I should clarify. I meant to say that it would be better to send emails to companies that you like at your own pace. Mass emails may seem fake. But a letter or an email with many people "signing it" with their social media account or their gaming accounts might have a bigger impact.

Emails were a no-go due to how Jap companies ignore non Japanese emails.

Unless you also translate the "Hi, I am a long time fan. I found this article online and have some concerns"- but then you'll be translating a template resulting in mass spam appearance.

As for "signing it" that's why we encourage FaRTs (Fave and ReTweet) on stuff we want to push. It also helps it appear in other people's search results. So always post important tweets here if you need them boosting- even your own.

Regarding OP Dicktionary, it’s not really an active task, more of a passive one. I did it so that people could understand the connection between the words we use and how they affect our thought process, as well as the importance of gradation in language, so we can measure things out in varying degrees instead of a dichotomy similar to the Good Ungood dynamic in 1984. It’s a red pill to swallow, if you so choose. Unless you guys have anything you want to do with that information (pass it along to one of our journo friends and get a conversation about our changing linguistic dynamics going for instance), I would say to take it off. The general rule of thumb is that passive tasks don’t take up space in the Current Tasks section. Or if you want to compromise, just stick it in the discussion section. Whatever you do, one of you need to save the links for me, because I’m not gonna be able to hold onto them. And if you’re a true autist, copy paste whatever posts are missing from the /pol/ archive to the 8diamonds thread.

I intend to start another one of those threads again very soon to keep the conversation alive. /pol/ responded really well to it.

>Do we co-ordinate on one per week, or do we allow a more natural flow.

>The former means it will get noticed, and we can discuss if it's a good idea to send it to certain people (Kamiya won't be on board, since Bayonetta is untouched)- but it can be annoying to them to have lots of people "spamming" messages to them and they might ignore or reject it thinking it's an anti-Nintendo shill.

>The latter means it won't get noticed (NoA can't run interference if they don't know) and the devs might come across it more naturally out of curiosity… Or they'll ignore it. The Japanese text should catch their eye.

Seems like the best approach is to co-ordinate a single person for one week, be polite, FaRT each other's stuff, and back the hell off the second they confirm they've seen it.

The pedo stuff most likely. He tried to get an msnbc reporter fired a while back for a rape tweet. They acctually fired the guy but them brought him back because the left flipped out that Cerno was the one who brought it up.

There's a reason why SJWs and allied stooges in the MSM are fighting so hard against gamergate, comicsgate, and cardboardgate over what should be silly "kid's" shit like videogames, comicbooks, and cardgames.

>recent shootings like Colorado have various celebrities wanting to ban all guns

>same celebrities believe the president is about to make himself dictator of America

Shared this video to a couple friends I grew up with who are now massive progressives, now they never want to talk to me again. Must be really, really painful to be confronted with your own cognitive dissonance. :^)