User talk:ColbertFan

"Anonymous User" (obviously not your real name), The content and spelling of your statement looks to me like that of an atheist. I've managed to read your rants and you are unlike 99% of evolutionists, who avoid the Bible like the plague and even discourage others from reading it, so anyone with an open mind can see that you're a victim of Professor values. Furthermore, you are in denial that prayer in school stops language devolution. Got news for you: chivalry played a central role in world history, and still does. I often see good minds spiral into decay once they fall for atheism. One more disagreement and your account will be blocked.--aschlafly 22:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I want my sysop status back! Also, great video. I think who ever made it was a pacifist, but still it was funny. Colbert|FanSome people do stuff 03:18, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

And the problem with being a pacifist is? Totnesmartin (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Nothing, I just don't agree with them. However, one of my friends is a pacifist. I think, however, that the only excuse for violence to stop other peoples violence. Colbert|FanSome people do stuff 02:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I hugged a dalek and I died. Hey, Dalek want to join the Dead Club(aka heaven)? You are pacifist and thus you want to kill yourself(because a pacifist is someone who wants to kill him or herself for being a pacifist, right?). Colbert|FanSome people do stuff 18:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I think we need a "Don't Feed the ColbertFan" template. AcerBlue 20:50, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Seriously. You're 3-4 years late to the party on this one. It's not who we are anymore, and it's not what this site is about. Beyond that, vandalizing websites is a bad idea in general, and trying to mess with mean-spirited, vindictive, petty people like Rob, Karajou and JPatt could have real-world consequences. As I understand it, you're just a kid, right? You really do not want your mom getting a call at work from the Internet saying her boy has been engaged in that kind of nonsense. I wouldn't put that sort of thing past these guys.

No offence...

Also, the Confederate States of America were racist. If you'd like to argue otherwise, please begin by refuting Alexander H. Stephens' length speech at the founding of the Confederation:

"Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner- stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth."

If I were taking part in the founding of a new state, which I believed not to be racist, and the new Vice President spoke these words, not only would I be disgusted, but I'd probably have heckled him. In fact, the enormous non-racist crowd, from the population of this non-racist state, would probably have all heckled him.

So:
- You accept that the Vice President of the CSA said that the state was founded on the principle that one race is superior to another.
- You do not deny racism among the population of the CSA?
- You accept that the CSA would rather fight a bloody war than give up slavery;
but claim that they were not racist?

By these standards, what possibly could be a racist state? Could a racist state exist, if this were not one? Surely, Apartheid South Africa was racist, with whites legally seen as superior to blacks? Well what if the whites OWNED the blacks? Would that be racist?

How is that a nation state (the CSA) the founding documents of which entrench the right of members of one racial group to own members of another (and not vice versa) can be viewed as anything other than racist?

"which was of course completely separate from slavery and racism."
--LiquidBlue

I didn't say it was SEPERATE from slavery and racism, what I mean by "Nor do I believe the Confederacy was racist" means that I don't believe that is mainly founded on slavery. I know that it WAS a racist state, however, so was the US when it was founded(most of the founding fathers owned slaves) and we don't say the US was founded on slavery.

Putting people to high standards and then saying to supporters of a view "SEE!" is a bad arguing method.