Saturday, January 24, 2015

Typically
the president uses the State of the Union to outline their political agenda for
the year as well as their vision for the nation. The president makes his address not just to both
chambers of Congress but also to the players of national government who are in
attendance – members of the President’s cabinet, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and
Supreme Court justices.The State of the
Union provides an annual opportunity to identify those critical political issues
as the national priorities. Yet despite heavy losses suffered by the Democrats in
the 2014 mid-terms, President Obama appeared before the nation apparently bolstered
by recent reports of higher approval ratings.Just a few days ago President Obama delivered his sixth State of the Union address where he outlined the accomplishments and achievements of his
administration, “…Tonight, after a breakthrough year for
America, our economy is growing and creating jobs at the fastest pace since
1999. Our unemployment rate is now lower than it was before the financial
crisis. More of our kids are graduating than ever before; more of our people
are insured than ever before; we are as free from the grip of foreign oil as
we’ve been in almost 30 years.”﻿

Official White House Photo by Pete Souza

Appearing assertive at times, President
Obama challenged House and Senate Republicans on policy items such as tax hikes
on the wealthy and raising the minimum wage while issuing threats of presidential
veto. The president focused on the economy and what he termed as “middle-class
economics”.The President explained: “…That’s what middle-class economics is – the idea that this country does
best when everyone gets their fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and
everyone plays by the same set of rules. We don’t just want everyone to share
in America’s success – we want everyone to contribute to our success. So what
does middle-class economics require in our time?President Obama continues, “First – middle-class economics means helping working families feel more
secure in a world of constant change. That means helping folks afford
childcare, college, health care, a home, retirement – and my budget will
address each of these issues, lowering the taxes of working families and
putting thousands of dollars back into their pockets each year.”﻿﻿﻿﻿

Official White House Photo by Pete Souza

﻿﻿﻿﻿The president actually had a
pretty short wish list that includes proposals to provide millions of workers a
week of paid sick leave, lower community college tuition to zero, and rebuild
the nation’s infrastructure while producing jobs. “We can’t put the security of families at risk by taking away their
health insurance, or unraveling the new rules on Wall Street, or refighting
past battles on immigration when we’ve got a system to fix. And if a bill comes
to my desk that tries to do any of these things, it will earn my veto,” asserted
President Obama. Internationally,
the president discussed trade agreements, identified climate change as the “greatest
challenge”, mentioned the efforts to fight an Ebola pandemic, renewed his six
year old promise to close Guantanamo Bay - again, and repeated his proposed
changes to an antiquated 50 year old ineffective policy towards Cuba. But this
year’s state of the union address was different – there was a different
feel.The president admitted as much
when he said this year there will be no checklist – his submission of the
budget will suffice. There were no catchy slogans this year where last year,
2014 was to be known as the Year of Action
symbolized by presidential veto and executive orders. The truth is that while﻿﻿﻿ the president is showing higher approval ratings – the critical question
will be whether the higher ratings are enough to enable President Obama steer
the political narrative that will inevitably drive the national debate. Consider for a moment on the heels of
devastating losses in the 2014 elections, the president has now entered the
lame duck years of his presidency, and he will now be facing Republican
majorities in both chambers on Congress – the House and the Senate. Meanwhile the Republican Party's agendahas
set their sights on repealing the Affordable Care Act (otherwise known as Obamacare), anti-abortion bills, and of course,
tax cuts. The president will be hard pressed to move his agenda forward in this
hostile political climate where Republicans are empowered on the national and
state level. "...Imagine if we did something different...” the president asks.But the significance of the president’s state of the
union address is not so much about what was discussed but what was not discussed
– or discussed enough. Issues such as income inequality, K-12 education,
criminal justice reform and policing quickly comes to mind. Disturbing was the
president’s stance on advocating for political prisoners abroad while refusing
to acknowledge America’s political prisoners.Although, the president has proposed transformative changes for community
colleges he remains muted on K-12 education.The president’s plan to address increasing income inequality appears to be based
on his proposal to raise taxes on the high income earners and place fees on the
richest financial institutions and then redistribute the money to pay for free community
college tuition, and tax credits targeted for the middle class – “middle-class
economics” says the president. President Obama never mentioned the poor or
poverty – not even once during the nearly 60 minute speech. But what about the
millions who have not reached middle class status? Or the dim prospects of these
bills passing through a Republican controlled Congress? Certainly the political
drama will be played out before the national stage over the next two years for
all to witness – will the president’s pragmatism get bipartisan support? What
will be the president’s legacy?

But what about criminal
justice reform in the aftermath of the visceral public response to violent
policing? President Obama indeed mentioned
the need for criminal justice reform but in light of the world wide protests
raising the public consciousness about policing – the president failed to cast
his spotlight by not providing details as to what criminal justice reform would look like. He even refused to relent to the obvious symbolism to having the parents of Tamir Rice and Michael Brown, and
the wife of Eric Garner in attendance as his guests: “…We may have different takes on the events of Ferguson and New York. But
surely we can understand a father who fears his son can’t walk home without
being harassed. Surely we can understand the wife who won’t rest until the
police officer she married walks through the front door at the end of his shift,”
President Obama went on to say, “Surely
we can agree it’s a good thing that for the first time in 40 years, the crime
rate and the incarceration rate have come down together, and use that as a
starting point for Democrats and Republicans, community leaders and law
enforcement, to reform America’s criminal justice system so that it protects
and serves us all.” The president’s lack of detail regarding his idea for criminal
justice reform is particularly disappointing considering the Justice Department's recent
refusal to federally charge police officer Darren Wilson for killing Michael Brown.

Monday, November 24, 2014

The nation’s
political landscape is remarkably more Republican now with their decisive
victories a couple of weeks ago during the 2014 elections. Just in case you
forgot – not only did Democrats lose on the national level but they suffered
losses on the state level as well. For example, Democrats lost their only
majority in the US Congress – in the Senate and they lost seats in the House of
Representatives. Now bear in mind Democrats lost seats in state legislatures
all across the country and a few key governorships in Democratic Party
territory – like in Illinois, Massachusetts, and the biggest surprise in
Maryland.This is what the National
Conference of State Legislature had to say: “It appears that Republicans will have a net
gain of between 300 and 350 seats and control over 4,100 of the nation’s 7,383
legislative seats. That is their highest number of legislators since 1920.
Republicans gained seats in every region of the country and in all but about a
dozen legislative chambers that were up this year. It appears that Republicans
will have a net gain of between 300 and 350 seats and control over 4,100 of the
nation’s 7,383 legislative seats. That is their highest number of legislators
since 1920. Republicans gained seats in every region of the country and in all
but about a dozen legislative chambers that were up this year.” So what does that mean
– what does the current political landscape look like – Republicans now control
23 out of 50 state governments, that means both chambers of the state legislature
and theGovernor are all
Republican.They are Republican majorities in 30 state
legislatures as well as in 68 legislative chambers (one of the two houses that
typically makes up state government). Lastly, there are 31 Republican
governors sitting in state capitols across the country.Clearly the 2014 elections
has empowered the Republicans as the lines of battle are redrawn...at least until
the 2016 elections. You can already sense the tension quickly building as President Obama spoke of his intention to take executive action to address immigration reform
while Republicans counter by suing the president over the Affordable Care Act. The
first of many battles to come over the next two years...

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Sandwiched in between the applause and cheers during the 2014 State of the Union address delivered just over a month ago, was the stoic silence from the audience when President Obama said,”…and I’m reaching out to some of America’s leading foundations and corporations on a new initiative to help more young men of color facing tough odds stay on track and reach their full potential.” Although at the time, you could hear a feather drop, a month later we now know that President Obama was referring to his My Brother’s Keeper Initiative, announced February 27th to widespread enthusiasm and praise. “Today, I'm pleased to announce that some of the most forward-looking foundations in America are looking to invest at least $200 million over the next five years, on top of the $150 million that they have already invested, to test which strategies are working for our kids and expand them in cities across the country,” said the President. He went on to talk about why he’s embarking on this new initiative, “This is an issue of national importance. This is as important as any issue that I work on. It's an issue that goes to the very heart of why I ran for president.”

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Just ten days after delivering his most recent State of the Union address, where he described 2014 as the “year of action” – President Barack Obama kicked off the year by signing into law a $987 billion Farm Bill. In doing so, the president signed away $80 billion, over a ten-year period, in cuts to food stamp benefits. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the cuts will affect approximately 850,000 people, who will see their monthly benefits reduced by $90. But just a few days ago, President Obama stood before the nation and outlined his proposals designed to tackle poverty, income inequality and economic mobility. These proposals focused on job creation, immigration reform, tax policy reform, job training, and unemployment insurance reform. Yet days later, President Obama talks about the reforms and the billions of dollars the new law will save. The $987 billion Farm Bill appears to be another example of how public policy can exacerbate poverty while simultaneously advancing income inequality. Consider for a moment that while billions of dollars are cut from food stamps – the agribusiness interests will reap the benefit$.

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

In the days leading up to President Barack Obama’s fifth State of the Union (SOTU) address, income inequality emerged as a highly anticipatedtopic to be discussed. This was quite understandable and actually made sense considering the recent events - the president’s speech on income inequality (though billed as a speech on economic mobility), his announcement of the Promise Zones as part of his administration’s anti-poverty strategy, and the celebration of the 50th anniversary of the War on Poverty. As the president delivered his address and spoke about working hard and getting ahead in America, he said, “Now, let's face it: That belief has suffered some serious blows. Over more than three decades, even before the Great Recession hit, massive shifts in technology and global competition had eliminated a lot of good, middle-class jobs, and weakened the economic foundations that families depend on.” The President continues, “Today, after four years of economic growth, corporate profits and stock prices have rarely been higher, and those at the top have never done better. But average wages have barely budged. Inequality has deepened. Upward mobility has stalled. The cold, hard fact is that even in the midst of recovery, too many Americans are working more than ever just to get by; let alone to get ahead. And too many still aren't working at all. So our job is to reverse these trends.”