Feeder Buses for Housing Areas Soon and Not a Sen Lost in The Deal January 24, 2010

On Sunday 24 January 2010, The Star carried a page lead headlined “Feeder buses for housing areas soon”. The story also had the photo of a grinning Ong Tee Keat with students from various races. A day earlier, The Star had a page lead titled “Ong : Not a sen lost in the deal”. The story spoke of Tee Keat who had the interest of the people at heart when the Transport Ministry terminated the deal to buy 8 diesel multiple units (DMUs) for KTM Berhad. It also had a photo of a grinning Tee Keat. The same daily also had Tee Keat expressing his anger against those who had torched the two surau.

To highlight the MCA president and Transport Minister daily is a must for The Star, especially if he is to distract public attention from the fact that he and deputy Chua Soi Lek had at 10am on October 10 had been booted out by MCA members from holding the party’s top 2 posts.

The problem since then is that Tee Keat and Soi Lek do not want to step down. And to distract the public (and MCA members) from the rightful thing for them to do – which is to relinquish their posts and allow other leaders to lead the party – they have instead gone on a crusade to be in the news as much as possible and perceived to be tackling different issues and problems.

In this age of the new media, spin doctoring in the mainstream media is no longer effective especially when The Star seems to be the only newspaper highlighting the “positives” of Tee Keat and Soi Lek when the other mainstream media have totally opposed views.

The fact is that the people, especially MCA members, are truly fed up with their antics and dishonesty. If Tee Keat and Soi Lek continue to be oblivious to the decisions of the members, there will be no respect for MCA during the 13th general election.

In fact, there is already no respect from the people for both leaders.

Picture the opposition’s election campaign banners then. One says “If Tee Keat and Soi Lek are not needed by members themselves, how can they be needed by the people?” Even worse, another banner will be carrying blurred images of a bedroom scene.

Under these circumstances, how can the BN possibly win through MCA?

So to Tee Keat and Soi Lek, please withdraw and the nation will remember you both as responsible leaders whose interests are only to safeguard the interests of the Chinese and Malaysians.

If not, the circus will continue and the both of you will be eternally remembered as clowns.

Share this:

Like this:

Related

Are there not ‘better’ people in Malaysia to lead the country? Vote for those who champion freedom, transparency and accountability whoever they may be. If they want the people to be honest, the politicians first need to lead the way forward. It’s just a matter of time if this is not corrected. So why that pitiful clowns like OKT and CSL still hovering in the MCA? Do something to make the MALAYSIANS realised the importance of painting a new picture.

ALL Chinese people for 7000 years have put paramount importance on the concept of ” HAVING FACE ” Even if they are dirt poor they would have a good red wedding for their children or a good white funeral for their dead ancestors.All their friends and relatives would give them red packet money or white packet money to maintain their FACE for the community.They would return the same favor to their benefactors in future.
Let me compare the greatest modern politicians of modern day China.
1) Sun Yat Seng give FACE to the Chinese People for his great work in taking China back from foreign devils.
He gave FACE to the Chinese people.
2)Mao Tze Tung give FACE to the Chinese People for his great work in making China a strong nation again.
He gave FACE to the Chinese people.
3)Deng Siew Ping give FACE to the Chinese People for his great work in making China the second largest economy in the world within ten years.
He gave FACE to the Chinese people.
Let me compare the infamous modern politicians of modern day Malaysia.
1)Ong Tee Kiat was accused of taking 10 million ringgit corruption money.He did not give FACE to the Chinese people.
2)Chua Soi Lek was accused of having oral sex with somebody’s wife.He did not give FACE to the Chinese people.
3)Liow Tiong Lai was accused of taking a free RM 600,000 luxury car from a corrupted contractor.He did not give FACE to the Chinese people.

A infamous Chinese politician called Tiong King Sing stole RM 12.5 billion from the people.
If he did the same thing in China he would be dragged to the execution ground and be shot with a bullet at the back of his ear.Tiong King Sing used the law to cover himself.
He is telling all the future nations that if you want to steal from the country..You must steal enough to buy off your persecutors.
This country is a land of milk and honey for Chinese.

About...

It now boils down to one word – consensual. Although short, today’s trial proceedings nevertheless produced enough interest and detail to last a lifetime, or at least a political career.

The issue at hand was the difference in the charge sheet and Saiful’s testimony. The charge sheet accused Anwar of consensual sex against the order of nature, whereas his defense team argued that Saiful’s testimony spoke of non-consensual sex against the order of nature.

Their argument was so persuasive that the judge adjourned the hearing to determine whether or not to impeach the testimony of AI’s accuser.

Karpal and gang were over the moon and AI was laughing uproariously. One wonders why though? Was AI laughing too soon?

The fact is that “sex against the order of nature” is prominent in both the charge sheet and the accuser’s statements. So is the prosecution merely saying that the sex was consensual or not non-consensual as claimed by Saiful? If this is so, how does it help disprove that Anwar indulges in “sex against the order of nature”?

From sodomy to homosexuality…was Anwar laughing too soon? It’s all in the transcript. The wordings of the charge sheet and the statements are there and so are Karpal’s arguments in full. You decide – was it consensual or non-consensual.

Because obviously, you no longer have to decide if “sex against the order of nature” really took place or not.

Email Subscription

Archives

10 Ridiculously Dangerous ChemicalsBy Ben Gazur, Listverse, 9 December 2016.Although they make up almost everything around and inside us, chemicals suffer from a bad reputation. While it’s true that some chemicals can be beneficial, all chemicals can be hazardous under the right conditions. The chemicals on this list, however, are risky to be around even und […]

Assalamualaikum w.r.t.Quite a while I have not posted anything in the blog. Went to PTS raya gathering this afternoon (15/10/2009), and got a dose of adrenalin to write something. I have hyperlinked the blog to 'NASA Image of the Day' and today's image, taken from NASA's Swift satellite, is of a galaxy, known as M31 in the constellation A […]

No 1MDB to blame this time KL, Dec 7: Is there something rotten in Singapore? Repeated financial scandals and deep-set financial deviances seem to suggest a major breakdown of compliance and serious oversight in a global financial centre. Previously, they had 1MDB to conveniently blame (for cases in that actually concerned internal processes flaws, including […]

Laundering: Real Estate and ArtTheir laundering functions replicate a fund which in 1MDB’s balance sheet is deemed as investments. Once the London mansion with its swimming pool or a Picasso’s portrait of his love, Marie-Therese Walter, is sold, the proceeds typically return to a private banking account. Hoarding such kind of assets are better than […]

Dear Friends and members Clamouring for the Almighty The ‘Allah’ controversy rages on relentlessly in this beloved land of ours, wreaking havoc to the very fabric of multiethnic and multireligious Malaysia. The recent controversial Jais raid on the Bible Society of Malaysia and confiscation of the latter’s 321 copies of AlKitab only raises the already hot po […]