@lj wrote:You have to admit that without him this whole sage would be less pink colourful

I feel Pinky has let me down. We've had all sorts of sightings and efits...roma, swarthy dark skinned people, a dead black person, brunettes, blondes....where are the ginger people? Why aren't ginger people represented? where are the strawberry blondes?

@lj wrote:You have to admit that without him this whole sage would be less pink colourful

I feel Pinky has let me down. We've had all sorts of sightings and efits...roma, swarthy dark skinned people, a dead black person, brunettes, blondes....where are the ginger people? Why aren't ginger people represented? where are the strawberry blondes?

Clarence "not quite a bouffant" Mitchell is the perfect shade of Political Pink, just right for Brighton. He's probably door knocking with a satin sash in raspberry crush pink with "Have A Gay Day" picked out in diamante.

@lj wrote:You have to admit that without him this whole sage would be less pink colourful

I feel Pinky has let me down. We've had all sorts of sightings and efits...roma, swarthy dark skinned people, a dead black person, brunettes, blondes....where are the ginger people? Why aren't ginger people represented? where are the strawberry blondes?

Or the auburns!

This is clearly a sign that perhaps redheads don't holiday in the Algarve or that redheads are trustworthy people.

@Smokeandmirrors wrote:Clarence "not quite a bouffant" Mitchell is the perfect shade of Political Pink, just right for Brighton. He's probably door knocking with a satin sash in raspberry crush pink with "Have A Gay Day" picked out in diamante.

He looked really out of place door knocking to whip up support in a Brighton suburb wearing a fleece.

Clarence Mitchell,aka 'The Freak'.Last seen on Brighton Pier having a fish pedicure.Sitting their with his feet dangling into the tank having his verrucas sucked off.The closest he'll ever come to having real friends.

Maybe a bit of objective thinking is required here? what ever contributors personal views as to the character of Mr Mitchell. to my mind a "snake oil salesman". he has been very good at manipulating the media and deflecting criticism of the MCCann's. i see him as a lawyer representing someone whom he may well feel is guilty. but he continues, possibly for the money, possibly for the media exposure. but he has been good at the job he was employed to do. love him or loath him.

@ProfessorPPlum wrote: [...]The people who don't trust politicians don't vote. The people who do, do - and it's them I worry about electing him. Wouldn't it be great if we had a list of candidates and a choice to either vote for one or against another. I'd get up and un-vote for Clarence Mitchell then, for sure.

***That's more or less what my 2nd [husband] was in favour of. He was not politically [or otherwise ] engaged, but had a good sense of équilibre. In fact he proposed, that it should be possible to vote in favour of One and against another One.

@lj wrote:You have to admit that without him this whole sage would be less pink colourful

I feel Pinky has let me down. We've had all sorts of sightings and efits...roma, swarthy dark skinned people, a dead black person, brunettes, blondes....where are the ginger people? Why aren't ginger people represented? where are the strawberry blondes?

Or the auburns!

This is clearly a sign that perhaps redheads don't holiday in the Algarve or that redheads are trustworthy people.

He must have been training Andy REDwood too: Madeleine can be alive or dead.

____________________"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?" Gerry

@ProfessorPPlum wrote: [...]The people who don't trust politicians don't vote. The people who do, do - and it's them I worry about electing him. Wouldn't it be great if we had a list of candidates and a choice to either vote for one or against another. I'd get up and un-vote for Clarence Mitchell then, for sure.

***That's more or less what my 2nd [husband] was in favour of. He was not politically [or otherwise ] engaged, but had a good sense of équilibre. In fact he proposed, that it should be possible to vote in favour of One and against another One.

Isn't it sad that it probably would not make much difference anyway? It's like cars: they all start to look like each other.

____________________"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?" Gerry

@justathought wrote:Maybe a bit of objective thinking is required here? what ever contributors personal views as to the character of Mr Mitchell. to my mind a "snake oil salesman". he has been very good at manipulating the media and deflecting criticism of the MCCann's. i see him as a lawyer representing someone whom he may well feel is guilty. but he continues, possibly for the money, possibly for the media exposure. but he has been good at the job he was employed to do. love him or loath him.

If he was that good at his job the majority of people in the UK would believe that the McCanns were entirely innocent.....

IMO the credibility of this individual has plummeted since he became involved with the McCanns, unless of course he did not possess any to begin with.

Therefore, IMO, either objectively or subjectively, he's been shown up for what he actually is, outdated, out of touch with the worldwide web, and out of the equation.

@justathought wrote:Maybe a bit of objective thinking is required here? what ever contributors personal views as to the character of Mr Mitchell. to my mind a "snake oil salesman". he has been very good at manipulating the media and deflecting criticism of the MCCann's. i see him as a lawyer representing someone whom he may well feel is guilty. but he continues, possibly for the money, possibly for the media exposure. but he has been good at the job he was employed to do. love him or loath him.

I think he's been dreadful, he is to the world of PR what Gerald Ratner was for business.

@justathought wrote:Maybe a bit of objective thinking is required here? what ever contributors personal views as to the character of Mr Mitchell. to my mind a "snake oil salesman". he has been very good at manipulating the media and deflecting criticism of the MCCann's. i see him as a lawyer representing someone whom he may well feel is guilty. but he continues, possibly for the money, possibly for the media exposure. but he has been good at the job he was employed to do. love him or loath him.

I think he's been dreadful, he is to the world of PR what Gerald Ratner was for business.