TOPICS:

EVENT ANGLE:

Premium Research

You can't buy a hybrid cloud as a product nor as a service, and even if you could you would need to customise it for your unique requirements and constraints. The reality today is you need to buy the ingredients from a supplier then roll your own hybrid cloud and to manage this you need to put in place a Hybrid Cloud Manifesto.

The SPC-2 benchmark is a useful benchmark for bandwidth intensive sequential workloads, such as backup, ETL (extraction, translate, load) and large-scale analytics. Wikibon does a deep comparative analysis of the SPC-2 results, time-adjusting the pricing information to correct for different publication dates. Wikibon then analyses performance and price-performance together, and develops a guide to enable practitioners to understand the business options and best strategic fit. Wikibon concludes the Oracle ZS4-4 storage appliance dominates this high-bandwidth processing as of the best combination of good performance and great price performance at the high-end and mid-range of this market.

The thesis of the overall Wikibon research in this area is that within 2 years, the majority of IT installations will be moving to combine workloads together to share data using NAND flash as the only active storage media. This will save on IT budget and improve IT productivity, especially in the IT development function. Our research shows that these changes have the potential to reduce the typical IT budget by 34% over a five year period while delivering the same functionality to the business. The projected IT savings of moving to a shared-data all-flash datacenter for an organization with a $40M IT budget are $38M over 5 years, with an IRR of 246%, an annual ROI of 542%, and a breakeven of 13 months. Future research will look at the potential to maximize the contribution of IT to the business, and will conclude that IT budgets should increase to deliver historic improvements in internal productivity and increased business potential.

The Public Cloud market is still forming – but seems to be poised to soon enter the Early Majority stage of its development where user behavior, preferences, and strategies become more stable. Large enterprises are more discerning of Public Cloud IaaS offerings. Test and development appears to be a key entry point for them since scale, operational complexity, and security/compliance/regulatory demands require a more nuanced approach to Public Cloud for IaaS. Small and Medium enterprises have the greatest need for Public Cloud and should consider well-established, lower risk entry points to Public Cloud like SaaS, Email, and Web Applications before venturing into Mission Critical and IaaS workloads to help them navigate an increasingly complex and costly IT infrastructure environment.

If Samsung Doesn’t Make Apple Chips, Who Will?

It’s no secret Apple and Samsung have a love-hate relationship. Nevertheless, the Korean firm provides processors to the Cupertino company, powering its products such as A6 processors fitted to the iPhone 5 and iPad 4.

The agreement between Apple and Samsung for the production of mobile processors for the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch is due to expire next year. And you can safely bet that Apple is not going to renew the agreement. Digitimes Research reported that Apple will start transitioning away from Samsung as a processor supplier in next year, and will likely to stop sourcing altogether by 2014.

Single source of electronic components

Samsung for many years remained Apple’s largest supplier of electronic components – memory, processors, and displays. Since Apple launched their mobile device lineup in 2007, Samsung has been providing processors, with the Cupertino company taking full advantage of Samsung’s capacity, marking mutual success. Last year Apple shipped about 226 million processors in devices such as the iPad and iPhone, representing a 13.5 percent market share. The demand is expected to increase over the next 12 months.

However, in the last year and a half because of a patent conflict relationship between the two companies, their relationship has deteriorated to such an extent that the confrontations have forced Apple to find a new manufacturer for processors in its devices. Last August Samsung was court-ordered to pay $1.05 billion in damages to the global IT giant for illegally copying some elements of the iPhone and iPad in its Galaxy S smartphones. Samsung pushed for a retrial, but was rejected on December 18 last year by the California judge handling the case.

How will it impact Samsung?

Samsung generated $8.2 billion in revenue through its semiconductor business during the third quarter of 2012. Apple’s iPod, iPhone, and iPad, making up about 81 percent of processors Samsung made in 2012.

According to DigiTimes Research, as Android devices will continue to power more devices, Samsung’s processor orders are slated to grow more than 36 percent next year, and by 2014 Samsung’s capacity for own-brand devices will be up 270 percent compared to 2012, overtaking Intel as the largest supplier of application processors.

The potential loss of Apple’s application processor (AP) orders is unlikely to have a significant impact on Samsung’s logic IC operation. According to the research, Samsung’s in-house capacity for APs currently fulfills only about 30 percent of the total demand for the firm’s own-brand smartphones and tablets, while the majority of Samsung’s AP production capacity satisfies demand for Apple’s iPhone and iPad devices. If Apple withdraws its orders, Samsung will have more available capacity to produce chips for its branded mobile devices in 2013.

Until now, Samsung’s own APs represent only 30 percent of its needs for its products. Samsung usually uses its processors in its high-end products including the Galaxy S3, S2 and Note 2, and uses various APs foundries products from Qualcomm, Nvidia, Broadcom, ST-Ericsson and Marvell for its other low range products.

Apple’s departure will force the Korean group to expand production of processors for its own needs, doubling its production for its own purposes in 2013 and continuing on a similar path in 2014. A lost contract with Apple would allow Samsung to increase production from 105 million units in 2013 to 185 million units in 2014.

This may also mean that the other processor vendors may have fewer opportunities to sell their products powered by Samsung processors in the coming years.

Has Apple found Samsung’s replacement?

If one believes the Taiwanese press, Apple has already signed a contract with TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) for the supply of A6X processors equipping the iPad. These have been manufactured by Samsung to date.

Introduced on the market last October, TSMC is the only supplier of chips engraved in 20 nm (for comparison, the processor of the iPhone 5 is dual core A6 and engraved in 32 nm).

If Apple goes through this transition plan, many analysts believe the company only has four options to turn to — TSMC, Intel, Global Foundries and Go Vertical. Then again, Apple could very well stick with Samsung.

On the rebound

Intel, TSMC and Samsung have a viable shot at being selected as Apple’s next foundry partners. TSMC clearly lacks the scale and leading-edge process level in order to compete in this league, while GlobalFoundries probably still has to prove itself following the public divorce from AMD. TSMC is pulling out all the stops in order to win Apple’s business, including hiring teams of IC design and system level engineers, accelerating its 20nm process development.

Amit Daryanani of RBC Capital noted that Intel is seen as the less likely partner, due to Apple’s investment in the ARM architecture. But Intel’s advantage here is that it controls its own manufacturing, and could gain traction in mobile simply because it can deliver the manufacturing goods.

Credit Suisse analysts are claiming that Apple could jump ship to TSMC’s 28-nanometer processors as early as the second quarter of 2013. TSMC’s 20nm process technology can provide 30 percent higher speed, 1.9 times the density, or 25 percent less power than its 28nm technology. The volume production is expected to start in the fourth quarter of 2013, raising the possibility that TSMC will hike capital expenditure to US$11-12 billion in 2013 and 2014.

Then again, Apple could make its own chips

According to a report by The Oregonian, Apple is highly motivated to take control of their own chip manufacturing, and is planning to invest billions of dollars to establish a dedicated chip fab in the city of New York.

The project, code named “Project Azalea,” revealed that New York state economic development officials have been asked to provide a 3.2-million-square-foot chip manufacturing factory to Apple for producing components for Apple’s iPhone and iPad. Two other states – California and Texas – are also believed to be in the running for “Project Azalea.”

The development in New York will ultimately serve Apple, whether it is their own manufacturing plant or one of their partners’. Apple seems likely to consider building a dedicated plant for TSMC and produce the two hundred million mobile chips Apple requires each year, streamlining operations, global logistics and the quandary of long-term relationships.

About Saroj Kar

Saroj is a Staff Writer at SiliconANGLE covering DevOps, Emerging Tech, Mobile and Gaming news. If you have a story idea or tip, send it to @SiliconAngle on Twitter.