“Charlie Hebdo” is a weekly French satirical pornographic
magazine for perverts and popular atheist consumption, sold freely in all
newspaper outlets and within easy reach of teenagers.

It is said to be “satirical” magazine only because
France is ruled by the Devil himself, the morally bankrupt Judeo-Christian,
Judeo-Protestant, and Laïque (Secular) Marxist left, and Israelist Jews like Laurent
Fabius (former Prime Minister of Zionist France who is now drumming for war
against Iran!) and Nicolas Sarkozy (former Knesset puppet President of Zionist
France who too wants war with all Arabs and all Muslims worldwide).

The same Israelist Jew Laurent Fabius teamed up with
Communist Gayssot and passed Fabius-Gayssot Law outlawing any criticism of the
Holocaust (or of Israel), but is in favour of “freedom of speech” when Islam,
Muslims and Arabs are demonised and the French populace is incited to hatred
and violence against Muslims in France and worldwide! Or when the Pope and Catholics are demonised.

“Charlie Hebdo” is a weekly satirical pornographic magazine even
if most depictions are cartoon like.Literature deemed as pornographic does not have to be illustrated with
real photographs of male and female prostitutes or whores to de described as
pornographic!“Charlie Hebdo” started as
Hara-Kiri (a satirical porn magazine, which was banned), then Hara-Kiri Hebdo
Weekly which was banned again.

In one of the Hara-Kiri issues, on the cover John Paul II
was shown (having sex?) with naked or half naked nuns, but I cannot confirm the
details of the cover depiction.

However, I still have a copy of Hara-Kiri Hebdo which I
purchased for 10 francs (£1 then in English money) in Gare-du-Nord during one
of my travels (sold to any Tom, Dick and Harry!), Hara-Kiri Hebdo, Wednesday, Number 3 released at the time of the
European orchestrated mass rape of Muslim women and girls in Bosnia Herzegovina
in the nineties.The European Union was then
led by British Prime Minister John Major and the Europeans were behind the
ethnic cleansing of Muslims in the Balkans at the behest of Israel and the US.

On the cover of that Hara-Kiri issue we see some 20 cartoons
of naked women being raped and with sperm all over their body, front and back,
and the title: “SERBS MORE POWERFUL THAN PATRICK BRUEL!Patrick Bruel is a French Jewish
Supremacist!

On page 3 of the same issue, we see the photographs of the
editor of Hara-Kiri Georges Bernier aka “Professor Shoron” and of three naked women
holding their legs up and showing their genitals wide open with a caption
saying they were “authentic” Bosnian women with banners attached to their legs
saying:

We
demand courting before the act

Our
body is not a motorway

Down
with penetrations by surprise

This is the type of filth that Jewish Zionist France enjoys
with the blessings of the Catholic Church and the Vatican and of the entire West!

Now, you must have a clear idea
of what “Charlie Hebdo” really is!

As for the demonstrations of outrage in public with the
burning of flags, I am totally against, but it is impossible to prevent some
more vulnerable people (like in all countries, Muslims or not) from feeling so
outraged as to commit some irrational acts.Anyway, it is not because of such public demonstrations of anger that
make the West go and bomb Muslim countries and plunder their wealth!"BAFS

Dieudonné : son avocat invité d'iTELE

Mark Dankof on the Charlie Hebdo Affair for the Rasa News Agency of Iran

Mark
Dankof on Charlie Hebdo:It’s a Zionist Instrument Dedicated to
Blasphemy and Subversion of Christian and Islamic Faiths Alike.

Seyed Muhammad Javad Mousavi of the Rasa News Agency of Iran interviewed Mark Dankof for his perspective on the Charlie Hebdo Affair. The Persian language version of the discussion may be accessed here.

1 – What do you think is the main purpose of continuously insulting the Prophet of Islam?

Mark Dankof: It is important to remember what Pat Buchanan told us all last week: The Charlie Hebdo
publication in France was also insulting and blaspheming every version
of orthodox Christianity when it depicted the God the Father and His
Son, Jesus Christ, as being involved in an incestuous sexual
relationship. Who has a vested interest in blaspheming both
Christianity and Islam as part of a world-wide ideological and political
game plan? Clearly, it is the global Zionist network which desires to
assert the Talmudic doctrine of Jewish racial supremacy on a global
basis, and to convince comatose Westerners that their primary enemy in
the world is Islam, and not the Zionist hijacking of their own banking
system, culture, government, media, and educational establishments. The
Frankfurt School and its Institute of Social Research which
destroyed the older Christian civilizations in the West in partnership
with the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith (ADL) by subverting
Europe and the United States with pornography, sexual perversion
including the LGBT (Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transsexual) agenda, and the
abortion/euthanasia industries, is working its demonic magic through all
kinds of Jewish-funded media outlets and NGOs to solidify its hold on
the Western world, even as it also seeks the subversion of the Islamic
societies and Vladimir Putin’s Russia. Eric Margolis concedes that the Charlie Hebdo publication is financed by Rothschild banking interests in France. Simply follow the trail of the money.

Pat Buchanan and Mark Dankof: Charlie Hebdo Depicts God the Father and God the Son, Jesus Christ, in an Incestuous Relationship.

Charlie Hebdo’s
financiers and handlers clearly seek to falsely equate mainstream Sunni
and Shia Islam with the Wahhabi and Takfiri fanatics comprising the
ISIS and al-Qaeda organizations, and to discredit Islam generally in the
West, even as orthodox Christianity is also lampooned. Both Islamic
and Christian movements must be infiltrated from within with sexual
decadence, paid intelligence assets, and internal disorder. The final
strategy in the quest for Zionist global supremacy and the final victory
of the so-called New World Order will involve the realization of the dream of launching the War of Civilizations envisioned by the Project for the New American Century
and its bedfellows. This will necessitate pitting Sunni Islam and Shia
Islam against one another as adversaries, and pitting what remains of a
Christian remnant in the West against both Islam and Putin’s Russia. Divide and Conquer is the age-old methodology used by this evil monolith.

2 – Some analysts believe that the role of the western intelligence services such as MI6 and Mossadis undeniable regarding the Charlie Hebdo attacks. What’s your take on that? If there is a role, what are the possible reasons behind that?

Mark Dankof: While I cannot absolutely prove it, I agree with Ron Paul and Paul Craig Roberts that the Charlie Hebdo
affair has all the earmarks of a False Flag operation conducted by the
Israeli Mossad, the British MI6, and the American CIA. It is ludicrous
to believe that the national security police states erected in Europe
and the United States would be providing money, political, and
logistical support to ISIS in a clear attempt to overthrow President
Assad in Syria (a clear Zionist objective as a prelude to attacking
Iran), and then would subsequently fail to effectively monitor the
comings and goings of hundreds of these Wahhabic terror elements
traveling with apparent impunity between Syria and both Europe and the
United States. These travels are being allowed for a purpose, which is
to deliberately enact incidents of this kind, diverting Western public
attention from the Hidden Hand financing and directing these operations,
as well as diverting public attention from ongoing Israeli atrocities
in Palestine, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. Additionally, I believe France
was being punished for its public deviations as of late from the
wholesale support of the Zionist agenda demanded by the power elite in
the West. I refer to the French Parliament’s recent pro-Palestinian
vote (s) in public session, and President Hollande’s urging of a
reassessment of the wisdom and utility of the economic sanctions being
imposed on Putin’s Russia.

I
believe there are additional cracks in the canvas being painted by the
real perpetrators of this incident, including the convenient leaving
behind of an Identification Card in a getaway car by the alleged
assailants, and the equally convenient killing of the accused by the
French police. Dead Men Tell No Tales. . . . Just ask Lee Harvey Oswald.

Mark Dankof: Netanyahu
is a war criminal and murderer simply taking advantage of the Zionist
controlled media in France specifically and the West generally. He
obviously wants to justify his regime’s criminal policies in Palestine
and Gaza by posing as a defender of human rights and freedom of
expression in the West against “Islamic Jihadists“. It is the established Zionist strategy to make the aggressor and the criminal perpetrator appear as the aggrieved victim.
This is especially outlandish, given the legal persecution and
economic marginalization of scholars and political activists in the West
who have criticized Israel, or who have questioned aspects of the
establishment Zionist narrative on what happened in World War II and
during the runup to the establishment of the Zionist state in 1948. What Dr. E. Michael Jones of Culture Wars refers to as the “Jewish control of narrative” has served Netanyahu and his predecessors quite well, especially in the United States.
How many Americans know about the Zionist bombing of the King David
Hotel in 1946? The Lavon Affair in 1954? The dispute between JFK and
Ben Gurion in 1963 over the Israeli nuclear weapons plant at Dimona in
the Negev? The Meyer Lansky Jewish Crime Syndicate connection to the
anti-Castro Cubans, to James Jesus Angleton of the CIA, and the
Giancana-Trafficante-Marcello-Roselli led crime syndicates in the United
States who were all provably involved in the JFK assassination? The
NUMEC nuclear raw materials thefts in Pennsylvania in the United States
for Israel’s weapons program? The Pollard-AIPAC-Ben Ami spy cases? And
the Arnon Milchan financing of Oliver Stone’s JFK movie which diverted
public attention from the Israeli connection to the events in Dallas in
November of 1963? What about the Israeli role in 9-11
and the subsequent coverup of this fact by the Israeli citizens
assigned to direct the official American governmental investigation of
the event?

The Hidden Hand Behind the Mask of the Truth.

The
Zionist-controlled Western media has perfected the Orwellian inversion
of truth and falsehood, victim and perpetrator ongoingly. Look at Syria, where the existence of “Jihadic extremists” being decried in France and the West for involvement in the Charlie Hebdo
affair are being simultaneously financed, trained, and introduced into
that country by the United States, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf Cooperation
Council (GCC) states, Turkey, and Jordan for the express purpose of
overthrowing the Alawite regime of President Assad. Look at the
criminals installed by coup d’etat last February by the
United States, Israel, and the EU in the Ukrainian regime headquartered
in Kiev, with all of the atrocities committed by this regime in the
eastern part of that country since, including the shootdown of Malaysian
Airlines Flight MH17 falsely attributed by Western media to Vladimir
Putin or Russian ethnics under his control, and the horrific Odessa Trade Union building burning.

It is noteworthy that the mastermind of these crimes, Petro Poroshenko, joined Netanyahu in Paris for the Charlie Hebdo protests.

The Odessa Trade Union Fire: The Work of the Latest American-Installed “Government.”

These
illegal actions continue the NATO encirclement of Putin’s Russia in
complete contravention of George H. W. Bush’s explicit promises to
Gorbachev and Shevardnadze after the end of the old Soviet Union. This coup d’etat is
also another way of punishing Putin for effectively stymying (for now)
American and Israeli plans to employ overt military force against Assad,
even as Jewish and CIA financed NGOs in Russia are attempting to
subvert Putin and Russian Orthodox Christian resurgence from within by
employing the Frankfurt School types like Pussy Riot and Elton John to
attack nationalistic culture and morality in that country. It is all a
part of the playbook of the New World Order, as is the False Flag Charlie Hebdo incident and the Orwellian inversion of truth and falsehood, victim and perpetrator, that has predictably followed.

Vladimir
Putin: Opposing the Subversion of Christian Culture in Russia and the
Target of the Apostles of the Zionist New World Order.

4 – There is a campaign going on throughout Muslim countries named #WeLoveMuhammad. How effective do you see this campaign, especially regarding its reflection in western and US media outlets?

It
will have no appreciable effect in the Western world and in the United
States, where the Zionists have a lock on the control of narrative.
Simply look at the way they have marginalized Christian anti-Zionist
media critics and activists like me in America. Having successfully
achieved that, what makes anyone believe an Islamic media and political
movement will be any more effective in changing the political and media
neighborhood in the West?

A message to French Muslims from Sheikh Imran Hosein

WASHINGTON, DC -- The NATO intelligence provocation appearing in
the guise of the scurrilous Mohammed cartoons published by the reactionary
newspaper Jyllands Posten of Denmark, and then by a series of other European
publications, has already done much to mobilize the armies, bases, and
treasuries of Europe in support of the lunatic plan to the Bush-neocon
clique for a nuclear sneak attack and punitive expedition against Iran
over the coming weeks or months. As I warned in a red alert for synthetic
terrorism issued on total411.info and other sites in the late afternoon
of Feb. 3, this entire affair has been cynically orchestrated by NATO intelligence
agencies to set the stage for a new world war.

In recent years, Moslem and Arab resentment
for the various crimes of imperialism has been directed primarily against
the United States, the United Kingdom, and Israel. What is new about
the present crisis is that Denmark, Norway, France, and Germany are the
main targets this time, while the usual suspects in London and Washington
can remain in the background and hypocritically condemn the inflammatory
cartoons. The result has been a massive degeneration of the ideological
climate of Europe in favor of militant racism in the form of the Samuel
Huntington War of Civilizations. The Europeans are now far more likely
than previously to go to war against Iran as the tail on the Anglo-American
kite. The genocidal demand that the European Union cut off all aid
to the Hamas-led government of Palestine has become far more likely to
succeed.

BILDERGERGERS AND NEOCONS

The evidence strongly suggests that the
cartoon provocation was presented to Atlanticist oligarchs at the meeting
of the Bilderberger group held from May 5 to May 8, 2005 at the Dorint
Sofitel Seehotel Überfahrt in Rottach-Egern, on the shores of the
Tegernsee lake in the south German federal state of Bavaria. (See http://www.bilderberg.org/2006.htm#
Fountainhead for a partial attendance list) The first publication
of the cartoons in Denmark followed in September 2005. This meeting
was attended by the certified neocon fascist madmen Michael Ledeen, Richard
Perle, and William Luti ­ all desperadoes haunted by the prospect of
criminal indictment for their roles in the Iraq aggression, the Plame case,
the Niger yellowcake forgeries, and the Lord Conrad Black embezzlement
case. All three are fanatic proponents of the wider war against Iran,
also in the hope of staying out of jail. Others in attendance included
Dutch, Belgian, and Spanish royalty, top Eurocrats and NATO bigwigs (including
NATO Secretary General Jaap Hoop de Scheffer himself) from Brussels, Rockefeller
and Rothschild international bankers, and such all-purpose villains as
Henry Kissinger. Another prominent participant in the Bavarian Bilderberger
group was Anders Eldrep of Denmark, a Bilderberger regular over the last
five years. This Anders Eldrep (or Eldrup),the chairman of DONG (Danish
Oil and Natural Gas), is the husband of Merete Eldrep, the managing director
of JP/Politikens Hus (JP for Jyllands-Posten), the Danish publishing firm
which owns the newspaper which first published the Mohammed cartoons.

The Bilderberger group, founded after
World War II by Britain's genocidal Prince Philip and the Nazi SS Prince
Bernard of the Netherlands, represents one of the key nodal points where
the international finance oligarchs meet under US-UK leadership to ratify
consensus on larger strategic initiatives. It was for example the
Bilderberger meeting held near Stockholm in Saltsjøbaden, Sweden
in the spring of 1973 which secured the final consensus for the Royal Dutch
Shell plans for the October 1973 Middle East War and the attendant "Arab"
oil boycott, which looted Japan and Europe and imposed global austerity
to stabilize the US dollar and the Atlanticist banking system. That
financiers' staged oil boycott was the 1973 version of today's "peak
oil" hoax.

SOMETHING ROTTEN: POLITIETS EFTERRETNINGSTJENESTE

As for the repeated canard about freedom
of the press, all the countries of the Nordic Council have long maintained
press control through psychological warfare boards with the power to suppress
and plant news stories for propaganda purposes. Sweden is the best-known
example, but Denmark, a NATO member state, is no slouch either. Having
directed political organizing in Denmark for a number of years, the present
writer can also personally attest to the pervasive surveillance of publishing,
political meetings, and public speech (as of the mid-1980s) maintained
by the PET (Politiets Efterretningstjeneste), the Danish Security Intelligence
Service. The PET is a sinister and stealthy organization staffed
by devotees of the Danish monarchy, and its mandate is unchecked. (See
http://www.pet.dk/English.aspx for a chilling self-presentation, including
the ominous news that "the new Danish legislation on terrorism expands
the scope of the Intelligence Service so that PET's investigations, to
a higher degree than previously, may provide the basis of actual criminal
cases or other more offensive initiatives." Author's emphasis,
WGT.) Denmark, in short, is a monarchist police state.

Denmark has been largely a British puppet
state over the last two centuries ­ since Lord Nelson burned the Danish
fleet in a sneak attack on Copenhagen which put an end to Denmark as an
independent power. For the broadest political purposes, provocations
coming from Denmark can be thought of as being signed by the warmonger
Tony Blair personally. The current Danish neocon regime is in any
case a member of Bush's coalition of the willing engaged in the illegal
occupation of Iraq.

The editor of Jyllands Posten who ordered
the publication of the cartoons is Flemming Rose, who has extensive connections
to Daniel Pipes, another neocon fascist madman who runs Campus Watch, a
neo-McCarthyite witch-hunting organization which vilifies American professors
who criticize Israel or show sympathy for the Palestinians. President
Bush wanted to name Daniel Pipes to the board of the US Institute of Peace,
a government-funded arm of the State Department which organizes conferences
and publishes books. When the raving extremist Pipes turned out to
be too widely discredited to obtain Senate confirmation for this post,
Bush forced his nomination through with a summer 2003 recess appointment
to a temporary term at USIP without Senate approval. Daniel Pipes
is the nepotist son of Richard Pipes, a Sovietologist who was a leading
figure in George H.W. Bush's 1976 Team B, the incubator of today's neocon
clique. At the time of his recess appointment, Daniel Pipes was accused
by the very moderate Arab-American Institute of "hatred and bigotry"
in the context of his "bizarre obsession with all things Arab and
Muslim." (http://www.aaiusa.org/pr/release08-14-03.htm) This
is the sick, racist point of view embraced by Jyllands Posten.

Flemming Rose provided details of his
conversation with Daniel Pipes in a later article. They talked about
the need to mobilize Europe for the war of civilizations against the Moslem
world. Rose wrote: "Pipes is surprised that there isn't greater
alarm in Europe over the challenge that Islam represents thanks to falling
rates of fertility and a weakened sense for its own history and culture."
(Flemming Rose, "The Threat from Islamism, Jyllands-Posten, October
29, 2004) The relation of such racist arguments to the Mohammed cartoons
provocation should be clear enough.

GENERAL WAR IN SIGHT

With these facts, a strong prima facie
case for preconcert in the cartoon affair emerges. The convergence
of the US-UK nuclear lynch mob's dragging Iran before the United Nations
Security Council in a parody of the spring 2003 US-UK proceedings against
Iraq, plus the cartoons affair, means that a new general war, perhaps more
like the Thirty Years' War (1618-1648) than futuristic scenarios of World
War III, is now in sight.

EURO-TRAITORS ON THE MARCH

The impact of the cartoon affair has
been to re-invigorate the already considerable racist and xenophobic forces
of European society, making these tendencies more respectable in parts
of the mainstream. For the moment, xenophobic reactionaries ­
Euro-traitors in every sense ­ are in power in France, Germany, Italy,
Denmark, the Netherlands, and other countries of the old continent. None
of these governments would dare resist Rice and Straw in a war vote at
the UN. Of course, if these regimes decide to play Mussolini to Bush's
Hitler and actually send their troops to join the Anglo-Americans in war
with Iran, most of them would fall, but that would come too late to avoid
the looming general conflagration.

The alleged free speech defended by ranting
Atlanticist hypocrites (including Cheney) thus amounts to the opposite:
the defense of a society incessantly manipulated by out-of-control
secret intelligence agencies with the help of the controlled corporate
media ­ a martial law society on the road to the endless war desired
by the invisible government and the neocons.

PRECONCERT ON BOTH SIDES

Danish embassies have been burned in
Syria, Lebanon, and Iran. There are indications that some of these
violent riots were not spontaneous, but were the work of mercenary rent-a-mobs
stoked and steered by CIA, MI-6 and Mossad. In Beirut, UN officials
told CNN they knew about the riot before it happened. But the embassy
attacks, plus world-wide threats, protests, and economic boycotts, have
gone far to convince European public opinion that the war of civilizations
between the west and the Moslem world is indeed inevitable.

In 2003, Germany, France, Belgium, and
other European nations rejected the Bush-Blair plan for an illegal aggressive
war against Iran. Since, then, Atlanticist (US-UK) intelligence networks
have been working to overthrow or subvert the leading European governments.
In Germany, Chancellor Schroeder has been replaced by Mrs. Merkel,
a puppet of Wall St. and the City of London. In France, the Chirac
presidency, weakened by its own foolish support of last year's European
constitution, has been wholly subverted by last fall's "Moslem"
riots, which were led by old Nazi networks sheep-dipped in Islam under
the guidance of Atlanticist intelligence agencies. The beneficiary
has been the Anglo-Saxon Trojan horse, Sarkozy. Chirac has even issued
his own nuclear threats against Iran. The days are long gone when
Chirac could reject the war of civilizations and be cheered for it by Algerian
students, as he was in the spring of 2003. The one valuable lesson
most Europeans had learned from the twentieth century ­ the utter and
suicidal futility of war ­ has been called into question by the cartoons
affair.

IF A TERRORIST ATTACK OCCURS, BLAME CHENEY

Since last July, the world has known
of the order from Dick Cheney to the Pentagon to prepare for the atomic
bombing of Iran in the wake of a new 9/11 terrorist atrocity. Given
Cheney's manifest aggressive intent, it should also be plain that he is
not occupying his time doing rain dances in the hopes of conjuring up a
new terrorist attack. Cheney and his invisible government backers
in the US-UK rogue network are actively preparing a new 9/11 or Gulf of
Tonkin provocation with weapons of mass destruction in order to secure
the pretext for their attack. Our advice to the world is accordingly:
if mysterious WMD incidents occur anywhere in the world, don't start
looking for the swarthy perpetrators sporting turbans in the caves of Pushtunistan.
Look instead in Dick Cheney's office.

THE REAL CASUS BELLI: THE IRAN
OIL BOURSE

Much of the real urgency of the Anglo-American
attack on Iran comes not from nonexistent nuclear devices, but from the
planned March 20 opening of the Iran oil bourse, the first international
exchange since 1945 where buyers and sellers of oil can conduct their oil
transactions using a currency other than the US dollar ­ in this case,
the euro. The Iran oil bourse threatens the number one pillar of
US-UK world domination ­ the global hegemony of the dollar, as anchored
in the dollar's central role in oil and other raw materials transactions.
With the Iranian oil bourse, as much as $1 trillion of central bank
reserves may flee the US greenback into the euro, the yen, and other currencies.
The concomitant exodus of hot money from Wall Street would then puncture
the US stock bubble, the US housing bubble, and the US bubble economy generally,
leading to a collapse of the dollar in international exchange and the dumping
of hundreds of billions of dollars in US treasury bonds now in the hands
of the Chinese and Japanese. The transition from today's outmoded
and obsolete dollar-based system to a dollar-euro-yen system of fixed parities,
gold settlement, and high-technology exports to the developing sector could
be easily handled by peaceful negotiations, but this is exactly what the
neocons are determined to prevent. Ironically, the neocon obsession
for general war to preserve dollar dominance, by almost guaranteeing the
closure of the straits of Hormuz, will lead to an even more catastrophic
dollar collapse and world depression than the peaceful Iranian oil bourse
ever could. The neocons, in other words, are playing a losing hand.
Only fools would join them.

BEWARE THE IDES OF MARCH

When might the new hostilities begin?
General Sharon, before he was incapacitated, had told the Israeli
Defense Force to be ready to strike Iran in March. The former US
Iraq weapons inspector Scott Ritter says that the attack order has already
been given. Vladimir Zhirinovsky, the maverick Russian politician,
thinks that the most likely date is March 28, coincident with the Israeli
elections. Zhirinovsky has longed served as an auxiliary to Russian
President Putin, and his estimate may benefit from the insights of the
Russian special services. Whenever the attack comes, it is clear
that the NATO logistics and manpower infrastructure ­ the German railways,
the French air force and navy, the Italian ports and air bases ­ will
play a vital role. Without these, the US could hardly operate in
the Middle East at all. Today, the US neocons may be offering occupation
rights in various secondary target countries, like Syria, to tempt countries
like France or Italy into joining the war. When Hitler attacked
the USSR in June 1941, he was joined by troops from Italy, Romania, Hungary,
Finland, Spain, and other European states. These auxiliaries had
received promises of their own, but they fared poorly. The parallel
is suggestive for the path some Europeans wish to tread today.

RATTLING THE CAGES OF OFFICIAL WASHINGTON

Last Wednesday, a Home Depot in the Washington
DC suburb of Gaithersburg, Maryland was evacuated because of suspicious
package emitting a strange smell, which turned out to be a harmless videotape
recorder. Last Friday, the Rachel Carson Elementary School in the same
community, which is part of the region where many federal officials and
bureaucrats live and have their families, was evacuated because of another
suspicious package which a local official claimed looked like an Improvised
Explosive Device or Iraq-style roadside bomb. It was "something like
you might see in a war zone," said the spokesman of the Gaithersburg
fire department said to the radio and television that afternoon. The school
is typically attended by the children of federal employees. But the "IED"
also turned out to be a big nothing. Early this evening, the Russell Senate
Office Building was evacuated because of a nerve gas alert that also proved
to be groundless, a complete false alarm. But a dozen senators had to flee.
This escalating pattern of incidents likely to provoke hysteria among US
government officials betrays the intent of the invisible government to
overload the circuits and facilitate the stampeding of this government
into a wider war full of incalculable danger.

MOSLEMS: DO NOT ACCEPT PROVOCATIONS

Our advice to the Moslem world: DO
NOT FALL FOR PROVOCATIONS. From Count Thurn's 1618 defenestration
of Prague to Bismarck's Ems telegram in 1870, big wars have often grown
out of staged provocations. For years former Prime Minister Dr. Mahatir
Mohammed of Malaysia, an astute Moslem observer who knows how the Atlanticists
operate, has been telling his co-religionists that the greatest vulnerability
of the oppressors is located in the weakness of the US dollar. Mahatir's
argument has long been that it is time to stop complaining and dump the
dollar. The fall of the dollar will entail the fall of the International
Monetary Fund and of Wolfowitz's World Bank, the greatest engines of global
oppression. Those who burn the embassies of European countries or
attack their citizens risk becoming dupes serving as recruiting sergeants
for the NATO armies and air forces that are about to strike Iran, currently
the leading Moslem state, plus Syria and others. It is time to break
ideological profile, and respond unpredictably on the international monetary
front, where the chances for success are the greatest.

REFUTE THE BLOOD LIBEL OF 9/11

In terms of the battle of ideas, the
other great task for the Moslem world and for persons of good will everywhere
is to contribute to the utmost to the dismantling and discrediting of the
ultimate blood libel against Islam, the fantastic Atlanticist myth surrounding
the events of September 11, 2001. The international 9/11 truth movement
has shown how rogue networks inside the Pentagon and CIA organized those
events. Since the basis of every attack on Islam is 9/11, it is incumbent
on Moslems to join in refuting the myth. This will have the additional
effect of eroding Bush's fanatical political base, and preparing his fall.

WORLD PEACE

In my address to the Inter-Religious
Conference in Khartoum, Sudan in October 1994, I pleaded for a platform
of ecumenical and irenic cooperation among the world's great faiths based
in the comprehensive scientific, technological, and economic development
of all nations. This is the call of Christianity, with its imperative
of charity (agape) and faith expressed through good works, as in the second
great commandment: love your neighbor. This is the call of
the doctrine of social solidarity in Islam. This is the call of Confucian
benevolence and the related need for rulers to promote prosperity and education.
These are the ideas reflected in similar impulses prominent in Buddhism,
Judaism, and other faiths. These are ideas readily accessible to
persons of good will whose outlook is purely secular, whatever their political
persuasion. Humanity must act now to neutralize war provocations,
and thus to prevent the horrors of war itself.

Robert Faurisson on the Charlie Hebdo Debacle

"In 70 years, no forensic study proving the existence and operation of the 'Nazi gas chambers'!"

Edited by Jonas E. Alexis

Fredrick Toben

My dear friend, Dr. Fredrick Toben, sent me a letter the
other day written by Dr. Robert Faurisson, in which Faurisson provides
his own analysis of the Paris debacle. The letter was a response to
Michael Hoffman’s queries to Faurisson. Some of the questions includes,
“It appears from my reading, that Charlie was mainly concerned with
attacking Islam and Catholicism, and not so much with Judaism and the
gas chambers. Even if you were not a regular reader of Charlie, from
your vantage inside the intellectual milieu in which you operate in
France, can it be said that Charlie was known as a thorn in the side of
the rabbis and Zionists?

“Certainly we must concede that the staff of Charlie were courageous
and defiant. With this in mind, how do you explain their satire of (or
lack of satire) of Judaism and the Israelis?

“Today the French government is posing as the champion of damned and
marginalized writers, yet France has been vicious toward revisionists
and outlawed even actress B. Bardot for her relatively benign
statements, and attempted to prosecute Charlie for the Danish cartoons
and of course M’bala. How do you feel concerning this hypocrisy and can
you give us a few more examples of French government repression of
writers and cartoonists?”

I asked Toben if he would grant permission to publish Faurisson’s
letter. Both Faurisson and Toben agreed. It is somewhat a different take
on the situation, but it is worth publishing.

Dear Michael,

Robert Faurisson

I admire the quality of your questions, and thank you for the
understanding that you show me. I am going through one of the most
difficult periods of my life and, consequently, am unable to respond as I
would like. I haven’t the time.

These killings in Paris – with 20 dead in all, amongst whom five Jews
– rightly arouse widespread indignation but the Jewish organisations
have immediately exploited this indignation for their benefit.
They forget that, in large part, it’s been under the pressure of
international and French Jewish organisations that France has hastily
engaged in all sorts of military expeditions causing so many deaths in
the Arab-Muslim world.

They forget this country’s responsibility in the creation of the
bogus State of Israel – soon afterwards arming it with nuclear weapons –
and in the appalling fate of the Palestinian people since at least
1948; the presence of Netanyahu in Paris and his doings there were, in
themselves, an affront to an entire part of the Arab-Muslim world. Those
Jewish organisations live in anger and war; that being the case, how
can they be surprised if their adversaries live in anger and war as
well?

Such killings may bring to mind a number of murders committed by Jews
who subsequently became “heroes” of Jewish history. On February 25,
1994 Baruch Goldstein, an Israeli army physician armed with an assault
rifle, shot dead 24 Muslim worshipers and wounded 125 at the Cave of the
Patriarchs in Hebron before being subdued and killed there himself. His nearby tomb is a pilgrimage site for many Jews.

The hysteria we are witnessing now in France, in this month of
January 2015, has a precedent: that of May 1990 and the “Carpentras
cemetery” affair. It was the exploitation of that event that made it
possible to intimidate the French parliament into passing what is called
“the Fabius-Gayssot Act” of July 13, 1990, punishing by a term of
imprisonment of from one month to one year and a fine of up to 300,000
francs (now 45,000 euros), along with several other sanctions, those who
dispute “the existence of crimes against humanity” (that is,
essentially, crimes against Jews) as defined and punished in 1945-1946
by a body that the winners of the recent war had dared to name
“International Military Tribunal” (three lies in three words) of
Nuremberg.

This law, totally contrary to the French constitution, came into effect by appearing in the Journal Officiel de la République Française
of July 14, 1990, anniversary of the storming of the Bastille. It was
thanks to a televised lie of the Socialist president of parliament,
Jewish millionaire Laurent Fabius (his announcement to viewers that the
corpse of a Jew in the Carpentras cemetery had been taken out of a grave
and impaled through the rectum with a parasol pole), that the French
had been outraged. The Catholic authorities rang the great bell of
Notre-Dame in Paris.

The President, Socialist François Mitterrand, led a march through the
centre of the capital at the head of crowds of demonstrators. We have
now, in 2015, seen the same scenario repeated in the same place, with
Fabius in the front rank of “protesting” dignitaries, the Archbishop
taking the initiative of ringing the cathedral’s bells, the Socialist
President François Hollande marching through the streets.

Moreover, those Jewish organisations affect an attitude of desiring
to come to the aid of freedom of opinion and expression but, in reality,
what they are demanding is increased repression against “Holocaust
denial”.

Revisionism has made significant progress in recent years here in
France, thanks especially to the Internet. Those groups therefore want
censorship of the Internet, of Dieudonné (who has perhaps more than 80
legal proceedings pending against him), of the revisionists and of a
number of other unbowed men and women.

For want of time, I shall allow myself just three remarks to finish: 1) the name Charlie-Hebdo has, apparently, nothing to do with Charles de Gaulle; it comes, I believe, from the Peanuts
character Charlie Brown; 2) Gayssot is the surname of a former
Communist MP and government minister, and the Fabius-Gayssot Act is
sometimes called the “Faurisson Law” or “Lex Faurissoniana”; I have lost
count of the times I’ve been ordered to pay fines or damages on the
grounds of this law; other revisionists have been thrown into prison or,
like Vincent Reynouard, a father of nine, will be returning to prison;
for my part, I’ve settled for ten physical assaults – of which eight in
France – and the actions of the French police, who have carried out
numerous searches and seizures, or attempted seizures, at my house, and
who have often REFUSED to protect me in the presence of danger; 3) I
hope to be able, before long, to send you an English version of my
nine-page article (with illustrations) of December 31, 2014 entitled:

In 70 years, no forensic study proving the existence and operation of the “Nazi gas chambers”!

I dedicated it to Professor Ben Zion Dinur (1884-1973), founder of
Yad Vashem in 1953, forced to resign in 1959 for having preferred
scientific History to Jewish Memory.

I thank you, dear Michael, and congratulate you on the work you have
done over so many years, and in such difficult conditions, for the just
cause of historical revisionism.

Robert Faurisson, January 13, 2015

AND THE RACIST JUDEO-WHITE VILIFICATION OF MUSLIMS AND ISLAM IS NON STOP!!!

Introduction: The birth of Caricature

The history of Caricature, as part of a discipline in modern graphic
design, may be traced back to the cultures of ancient Egypt, Greek and
Rome and in the middle ages to Leonardo da Vinci's attempts to
comprehend the concept of ideal beauty, by analyzing "the epitome of
grotesque".

An Egyptian funeral boat

An Unfortunate Egyptian Soul

Caricatures are designed to oversimplify and exaggerate each subject's
distinctive features, while still maintaining a recognizable likeness,
in order to convey a visual message. According to Thomas Wright, a
message has been conveyed to us from the distance of the ages by an
Egyptian image in which a small boat with provisions that runs into
the back of a larger funeral boat, upsetting the tables of cakes and
other supplies. Thus this scene has the characteristics of a caricature.
Wright, provides other Egyptian examples in which animals are employed
in occupations usually reserved for humans which appear to be humorous ,
and he discusses examples of the ancient Greeks who were especially
partial to representations of monsters, frequently using their images
in their ornaments and works of arts.

The Egyptian God Typhoon

A Greek Gorgon

The Roman Sannio, from an engraving in the "Differetatio de Larvis
Scenicis" by the Italian antiquary Ficoroni, who copied it from an
engraved gem. He wears the Foccus or low shoe peculiar to the comic
actors.

In particular, Greeks adapted the figure of the Egyptian god Typhoon to
represent their Gorgon, as the above images show the Greek Gorgon was a
rather close emulation of Typhoon. The image of Typhoon with its broad,
coarse, and frightful face, lolling out his large tongue , appeared
frequently on the Egyptian monuments. According, to Pliny in his
"Natural History" among the pictures exhibited in the Forum at Rome
there was one in which a Gaul was represented, "trusting out his tongue
in avert unbecoming manner". Perhaps by using a Gorgon-type
caricaturization, Romans were trying to exhibit their displeasure with
Gauls. The Roman popular character Sannio, or buffoon, whose name is
derived from a similar Greek character and who was employed in
performing burlesque dances, making grimaces, and in other acts
calculated to excite the mirth of the spectators, was another example of
these ancient caricatures.

An artist studio in Pompeii

The Oldest drawing in British Museum, 1320 AD. Two demons tossing a monk headlong into a river.

Luther Inspired by Satan

In the Middle Ages religious anxieties were mixed with carnivals,
festivals and enjoyment of the ludicrous. A manuscript from this time
provides an example of two demons playfully tripping a monk and throwing
him into a river. According to James Parton, "Reformation began with
laughter, which church itself nourished and sanctioned ... upon edifices
erected before the year 1000 there are few traces of the devil, and
upon of those of much earlier date none at all; but from eleventh
century he begins to play an important role". Artists competed with
each other to give the devil the most hideous looks, and as time passed
he looked more and more ridiculous. However, Luther spoke of the devil
very seriously, as he thought that devils are present everywhere and in
every action. People laughed at clergy, "the clergy, self-indulgent" in
the words of Parton "preached self denial; practicing vice, they
exaggerated human guilt. " Parton writes " among the curiosities which
Luther himself brought from Rome in 1510, was a caricature suggested by
the Ship of Fools, showing how the Pope had fooled the whole world with his superstitious and idolatries.
... Luther himself was a caricaturist ... The famous pamphlet of
caricatures published in 1521 by Luther's friend and follower, Lucas
Cranach, contains pictures that we could easily believe Luther himself
suggested."

A coffehouse in London. In E. Ward, The Fourth part of Vulgus Britanicus; or, British Hudibras (London: James Woodward and John Morphew, 1710), frontispiece.

Between 1490 and 1495 Leonardo da Vinci (1452- 1519) developed his habit
of recording his studies in meticulously illustrated notebooks. His
work covered four main themes: painting, architecture, the elements of
mechanics, and human anatomy. It appears that as much as he was
interested in the human anatomy, through his sketches of various facial
characteristics he was also interested in understanding of the human
emotions and the impact of the ravages of time on the battered faces of
various characters. These sketches which are collected into various
codices and manuscripts, are indeed real precursors to modern
caricatures.

Over time,as Werner Hoffman, in his Caricature from Leonardo to Picasso.
(New York: Crown Publishers, 1957) argues artist deviated from
Leonardo's approach to the human figure to develop a more exaggerated
appearance of their subject. The “principles of form established in part
by Leonardo had become so ingrained into the method of portraiture that
artists like Agostino and Annibale Carracci rebelled against them.
Intended to be lighthearted satires, their caricaturas were, in essence,
‘counter-art.”

Study of Aesthetics in Five Rugged Heads, Leonardo da Vinci c. 1495

The parable of the blind, Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1568

Pieter Bruegel the Elder (1520?-1569), who was from Flanders introduced
his imaginative symbolism mixed with a subtle sarcasm in his paintings
of various biblical parables and other metaphors, such as the Parables
of Blinds, in which a blind is leading the others. His composition, and
exaggerations of various human sensitivities are truly stunning and
anticipates the best today's political cartoons.

The Drunken Silenus ("The Tazza Farnese", ca. 1597–1600

The cartoon like engraved frontispiece of the most significant book in
the history of science, Galileo’s Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief
World Systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican, which resulted in Galileo’s
censure and imprisonment by the Inquisition in 1633. The controversy
arose over his proof of the Copernican cosmology, which placed the sun,
not the Earth, at the center of the solar system. It depicts three great
students of astronomy in dialogue: from left to right, Aristotle
(384–322 BCE), Ptolemy (90–168 CE), and Nicholas Copernicus (1473–1543).
Ptolemy holds an armillary sphere with the Earth at its center, while
Copernicus grasps a heliocentric model of the solar system.

By the end of the 17th century, Annibale Carracci had raised the status
of the caricature up to a high art discipline. His exaggerated visual
narratives were later followed by many caricaturists of the 18th
century.

Annibale Carracci, Sheet of caricatures, c.1595, British Museum

Annibale Carracci, Various Works

According to seventeenth century sources, the
inventor of caricature as an independent art form was, the Bolognese
history painter, Annibale Carracci. Mosini
recorded Annibale's 'theory' of caricature as being the ultimate
antithesis of beauty: 'una bella... perfetta deformità.' Like beauty in
art, Annibale held, caricature was based on selection and synthesis. The
artist was to devise it, in a playful spirit like that of Nature,
whenever She offered him suitable models. The point was to offer an
impression of the original which was more striking than a portrait.

Political Cartoons

In political cartoons the artist reduces the intriguing conceptual
complexity of historical events, within a cultural context, into a stark
but simple imagery accompanied by a witty and sarcastic statement.
When this image is carefully analyzed, it leads to discovery of a
number of important historical, social,economical political, and
cultural facts that offer authentic and accurate insights into the
various cultural biases, human right issues, public anxieties,
democratic wishes, and other features of a particular age. They shed
light on enigmatic causes of historical events and describe the
trajectory of a civilization through time towards achieving humanistic
ideals . Since the early eighteenth century, political cartoons have
opened a sharp visual communication window into the past. The political
cartoon is always informed by an event and speaks to a specific
perspective towards that event. Thus to fully comprehend a cartoon, one
needs to be well-read about both the event and its impacts on various
perspectives.

The key to the caricature is an exaggeration of those aspect of a
narrative that the artist wants to highlight. The personage of a tyrant,
a charlatan politician or a corrupt clergyman in the hands of an artist
turns to a revealing caricature that no amount of censorship can cover
up. In this regard political cartoons have become a unique visual
communication device since the 17th century, providing political
editorials and socio-cultural commentaries. The main aim of this visual
communication is to shape public opinion by using a verity of artistic,
cultural, and psychological techniques, including resorting to
nationalism, symbolism, hyperbolic suggestions, labeling, analogy, and
irony. But, most often, they use sarcastic metaphors, satirical
comparisons, and over the top description of reality to simplify complex
political events so that the general public can comprehend their
significance, from a particular perspective.

Perhaps the first political cartoonist was the Dutch artist Romeyn de
Hooghe (1645-1708), who at the service of William of Orange, later King
William III of England, repeatedly caricatured James II and Louis XIV,
sometimes using pseudonyms on his most audacious images. He painted,
engraved, sculpted, designed medals, enameled, taught drawing school,
and bought and sold art as a dealer, but above all he was a graphic
designer who etched allegories and mythological scenes, portraits,
caricatures, political satires, historical subjects, landscapes,
topographical views, battle scenes, genre scenes, title pages, and book
illustrations.

Louis XIV as Apollo led by Madame de Maintenon, Romeyn de Hooghe, etching from 1701

Political cartoons played a significant role in the French Revolution
and later on during the Napoleonic era. Revolutionaries used cartoons
to highlight the lavish lifestyle of Marie Antoinette, often depicting
her in obscene and unflattering situations. Under the censorship of
Louis XIV of France, the caricaturists could not depict the sacred
person of the king. However, the opponents of the Sun King, who were
constantly at war with him, in coalitions that generally grouped the
United Provinces, England, and the Hapsburgs; resorted also to political
cartoons as a potent weapon. In this cartoon the king's image is not
distorted or deformed. The caricature style of depicting an enormous
head on a small body was not yet in fashion, however, it is rather clear
that it is the staging of the event that is supposed to communicate
with the viewer. The Sun King is represented as a sad, gloomy, and
pathetic sun. His private life and his many mistresses are the subject
of ridicule. Here the young Madame de Montespan, who was the most
celebrated maîtresse en titre of King Louis XIV, is especially jeered
for her bizarre relationship with a middle aged king who is depicted
preying on Madame de Maintenon. The eclipse of 1706 in this regard
provides a relevant backdrop to the sarcastic message. This celestial
phenomenon is foretelling the imminent demise of the Sun King.

One of the earliest
political cartoons was that of Robert Walpole, considered as the first
British prime minister (1720 to 1742), who was represented by his
exposed rear end. The cartoon did not show his face, because everybody
knew you had to kiss his bottom if you wanted a highly paid government
job. Walpole's attempts to arrest cartoonists only heightened interest
in this medium. Bowing to the inevitable, he commissioned more
flattering cartoons in an attempt to outflank his rivals.
”

From the French Revolution until the Great War: A Narrative of History in Cartoons

The Third Estate, the clergy and the nobility shouldering the national debt. French Revolution. Engraving; 1789.

Marie-Antoinette was cruelly lampooned throughout her life in France.
She was an Austrian Princess,who at age 15 married the Crown Prince of
France in 1770. She and husband Louis XVI were still teenagers when they
ascended the throne in 1774.

This anonymous cartoon from around 1791 blames the unfortunate queen
for her alleged infidelity, the scandal provoked by her alleged greed
in the affaire du collier or the necklace affair, the doomed flight to Varennes and counter-revolutionary intrigue. The image depicts her carrying the Dauphin,
her eldest son, and Louis XVI, followed by her daughter Madame Royale
and the King’s aunt Madame Elisabeth, leaping to safety from the
Tuileries. The royal couple are both holding the broken scepter and
are encouraged by the King’s brother, Comte de Provence (left), holding a
purse full of money. Beneath are references to the Queen’s alleged
sins.

The affaire du collier which was the trigger point for the French
Revolution was started when jewelers Böhmer and Bassenge nearly went
broke creating a necklace that they presumed King Lo­uis XV would buy
for his mistress Madame du Barry. But the king died before he could
purchase it and the jewelers hope that the new king, Louis XVI, might
agree to buy the necklace for Marie Antoinette was dashed when Marie
Antoinette discouraged Louis from purchasing it. Then a desperate,
heavy-indebted Comtesse de Lamotte told cardinal Rétaux de Villette that
the queen desperately wanted the diamond necklace but that she didn't
want to ask Louis for it. Comtesse and her lover, forged letters in
Marie Antoinette's hand and send them to the Cardinal, who was disliked
by Marie Antoinette, asking him to buy the necklace, and Lamotte slyly
suggested that if Cardinal de Rohan could find a way to procure it for
her, his good reputation would be restored at court.

At last, the cardinal wrangled the diamonds from Böhmer and Bassenge on
credit. The jewelers presented the necklace to the queen's footman for
delivery -- only the footman was Comtesse's lover Rétaux in disguise. He
seized the necklace and headed to London.­ When his first payment was
due, Cardinal de Rohan couldn't cough up the amount. The jewelers
demanded money from Marie Antoinette, who had no knowledge of the
necklace. By then, the necklace had been sold. A furious Louis had the
cardinal arrested; later, he was acquitted of all charges and exiled.
The scheming mastermind Lamotte was imprisoned but broke free and took
up residence in England. There, she spread propaganda about the queen.

Luis looks at the empty chests and asks “Where is the tax money?“ The
financial minister, Necker, looks on and says “The money was there last
time I looked." The nobles and clergy are sneaking out the door carrying
sacks of money.

Necker’s principal mistake was his misguided attempt to finance French
participation in the American Revolution without recourse to additional
taxation. In trying to raise the necessary loans, Necker published in
1781 his celebrated Compte rendu au Roi (“Report to the King”), claiming
a surplus of 10,000,000 livres in the hope of concealing an actual
deficit of 46,000,000. The opposition of the leading minister,
Jean-Frédéric Phelypeaux, comte de Maurepas, and the hostility of the
queen, Marie-Antoinette, forced Necker to resign on May 19, 1781.

"The Awakening of the Third Estate," an aristocrat and clergyman
are horrified to see a man casting off the shackles of his class.

The hierarchical society of France was distinguished by her three estates: the clergy, the nobility, and commoners.

The first estate, the clergy, occupied a position of conspicuous
importance in France. Though only .5 percent of the population, the
clergy controlled about 15 percent of French lands. They performed many
essential public functions—running schools, keeping records of vital
statistics, and dispensing relief to the poor. The French church,
however, was a house divided.
Taxpayers hated the tithe levied by the church, even though the full 10
percent implied by the word tithe was seldom demanded. They also
complained about the church’s exemption from taxation. While the
peasants remained moderately faithful Catholics and regarded the village
priest, if not the bishop, with esteem and affection, the bourgeoisie
increasingly accepted the anticlerical views of the philosopher.

Like the higher clergy, the wealthy nobles of the Old Regime, the second
estate, were increasingly unpopular. Although less than 2 percent of
the population, they held about 20 percent of the land. They had virtual
exemption from taxation and monopolized army commissions and
appointments to high ecclesiastical office.

Confiscation of Churches Lands

The runaway royal family busted by French democrats Louis and
extravagant Marie Antoinette were apprehended in Varennes, just miles
from the Austrian border. Some say the strong scent of the queen's
perfume gave their whereabouts away.

Edmund-Burke, Radical Arms, The conclusion of the French Revolution

James Gillray, "The Zenith of French Glory - the Pinnacle of
Liberty.(Louis XVI) Religion, Justice, Loyalty and all the Bugbears of
Unenlightened Minds, Farewell!", February 12, 1793. Etching

A French Gentleman of the Court of Louis XVI ; A French Gentleman of the Court of Egalité, James Gillray, 1799.

A sarcastic treatment from England of French manners that contrasts the
weakness of the old regime with the vulgar arrogance of the new
revolutionary regime. The engraver also seems to be pointing toward two
entirely different views of masculinity.

In England, James Gillray (1757-1815) adopted the caricatural style of
Bruegel, to create caricatures of his contemporary statesmen that
today can be categorized as political cartoons in which his wit was
directed not only against the political and legislative abuses of his
time but also against the morals of the royal family. Gillray initially
supported the French Revolution, and it's principles of liberty , but
when the revolution turned violent particularly during the work of the
Terror he turned against, nevertheless later on he turned against the
tyrannical regime of Napoleon Bonaparte, describing him as "Boney the
carcase-butcher" in a number of offensive images.

George Cruikshank (1792 - 1878) was at his best
when he was dealing with socio-cultural issues. His most celebrated of
social cartoons were his Monstrosities, which were published annually
from 1816 to 1828. As the conservative Victorian era began (1837) most
forms of satirical art grew to be unfashionable. George Cruikshank thus
turned his talents to the illustrated book, including Dickens's Oliver
Twist, which bear testimony to his artistic talent.

Bonaparte with authority
commandeth his soldiers with fixed bayonets during the attack on the
Council of Five Hundred. Note the exaggeration of his uniform and his
hat feathers trying to give a comic note to the scene. They brandish
proudly tricolor on what is written "Long live Bonaparte triumvirate -
Seyes - Ducos." On the young drummer boy's instrument is inscribed "Vive
la Liberté".

The governing Directory was
happy to send Napoleon to far-off Egypt. On the paper spread over the
table is written "Subject: Send Bonaparte to Egypt to prevent the
organizing of the Executive." According to some authors, Bonaparte can
also be seen as Banquo in Shakespeare's Macbeth, who encountering the
witches hear their prophesy about his future,that his descendants will
be kings. Bonaparte, simply dressed in a long white shirt with a tight
belt and boots is accusing the Board of wanting to remove soldiers as
the only reward for his victories in Italy.

Bonaparte, depicted in a bizarre
military costume, furiously reads a dispatch addressed to "Mounseer
Beau-Naperty ", which advising him to be cautious. On the paper
dropping from his left hand is written; "The conquest of the Chouans
(French royalists), old song called into music.", Signifying that
England does not trust the Bonaparte promises of reconciliation.
Behind him the second and third consuls are depicted as two buffoons
trying to read over his shoulder. On the left, the messenger, carrying
the red cap, awaiting Bonaparte's response.

A courteous Bonaparte is
politely welcoming to Paris the vulgar John Bull and his coarse bride
Hibernia, representing England and Ireland, that are recently united by
the Act of Union 1801. John Bull thanks his host by addressing him as
Bonny Party. He also uses the word "gammon", which has the double
meaning of "nonsense, humbug," and a cured or smoked ham; implying that
for John Bull, this is not a simple courtesy visit. His wife (Ireland)
interrupts him, telling him he needs to learn some manners.

English cartoonists are beginning to represent John Bull as squire with
top hat, Colorful jacket and culotte, a style of tight pants ending
just below the knee, first popularized in France during the reign of
Henry III. Bull's conservative instinct is in contrast to the excesses
of the Jacobins. Created in 1712 by John Arbuthnot, John Bull became
widely known from cartoons by Sir John Tenniel published in the British
humor magazine Punch during the middle and late 19th century. In those
cartoons, he was portrayed as an honest, solid, farmer figure, often in a
Union Jack waistcoat, and accompanied by a bulldog. He was explicitly
used as the antithesis of the sans-culotte during the French Revolution.

The three English visitors bow
before Bonaparte. Fox, the first character on left, is wearing a
revolutionary cap and has bowed so low that his pants are torn. Erskine,
in the middle, dressed in the black habit of lawyers and a paper out of
his pocket says "O'Conners Brief." Beside him, bows Harvey Christian
Combe, the Lord Mayor of London (recognizable from his gold chain). A
paper out of his pocket reads "Essay on Porter Brewing by H. C. " Comb
who acquired the Woodyard Brewery, of Castle Street, situated midway
between the City and the West End of London was remarkable for his
energy and great business ability. He became Lord Mayor in 1799, and
was returned five times as the City's representative in Parliament.
Sitting on a high chair decorated with elegant revolutionary symbols,
Bonaparte receives the homage with one foot on a small stool, the other
on the carpet covered raised podium. Note that he wears a director's
uniform, not that of the First Consul.

Napoleon wearing an unflattering
military uniform wearing a pirate crown adorned with weapons and a
skull. On the 9th of November 1799 (18 Brumaire) General Napoleon
Bonaparte overthrew the Directory and assumed leadership of the French
nation. Napoleon's victory at Marengo June 1800 followed by Moreau's at
Hohenlinden in December 1800 forced Austria into a separate peace.

Impressed by the exploits and eastern temptations offered by General,
now First Consul Bonaparte, Tsar Paul inclined towards France. Along
with Sweden, Denmark, and Prussia; Russia formed the Baltic League of
Armed neutrality to resist Britain's efforts to enforce the blockade of
France. This had added seriousness because of Britain's reliance on the
Baltic ports for imports of grain, naval stores and for export markets.
Britain was almost completely alone without an ally to be found across
Europe. By stroke of good fortune with perhaps a (some have suggested
there is a hint of complicity on Britain's part), Tsar Paul was
assassinated on March 21st 1801. The new Tsar Alexander was no admirer
of Napoleon and the promised Franco-Russian prosperity where they would
settle the fate of northern Europe and the near east together, now
evaporated like a mirage. Nine days later Nelson destroyed the Danish
fleet in Copenhagen ending any potential for a combined fleet to
threaten British naval superiority.

In the midst of the Swiss crisis in 1802 France annexed Elba and
Piedmont and in October Parma was occupied. To integrate these
territories into the national patrimony was going beyond the cherished
natural frontiers, and at such a critical juncture! This was flying in
the face of all reason.

The perception of the peace
treaty with England. Napoleon had foreign expectations that encouraged
him to seek peace. Initially and as Britain feared, he hoped to
diplomatically and militarily defeat Britain, but once the opportunity
to defeat Britain had diminished there were pressing reasons for peace.
For the people of France the revolution had turned out to be a roller
coaster ride, and to a large measure the reason General Bonaparte's
take-over of the government was so popular was that he was perceived to
be strong enough to bring things back under control in peace as he had
in war. Victories alone were no longer enough, what was the point of
victory if it didn't bring peace?

Here a thin and elegant, but cunning and deceitful Bonaparte who has
taken care to place his hat and sword on the floor, implying that he is
no longer a warrior but a friend, courts a plump, prosperous, but
outrageously dressed England (Britannia) who is depicted as a bit naive.
Having set aside, too, her trident and shield, she is captivated by the
fellow's charm, knowing that "he will disappoint again." In the
background, the portraits of George III and Napoleon's face each others,
but the eyes are wary, even-though their outstretched hands seem to
merge. It is said that Napoleon was extremely amused by this cartoon.

In the Treaty of London, signed
on the first of 0ctober 1801, the guarantee of a single great power in
charge of Malta was first abandoned for the collective guarantee of its
independence from all the six European powers: Britain, France, Spain,
Austria, Russia and Prussia. Although the last three were not present
at the table, the protection and guarantee of Malta's independence was
required from all of them.
British forces were to be withdrawn, the fortification were to be left
intact and for the next year, 1802, Malta was to be garrisoned by Naples
from which Napoleon was agreeing to pull his troops out of. Following
this the reconstituted Knights of St John would again hold the island.

However virtually none of this ever occurred. None of the other powers
ever offered their guarantee (although Russia toyed with the idea);
Britain never withdrew her garrison, and when Naples sent the temporary
garrison there were denied admission to the fortresses. The nominated
Grandmaster could not be persuaded to accede until March when it was
already too late, and the Knights of St John were insolvent and unable
to govern the island in any case. By March both sides were talking of
the possibility of war over Malta. France had never disarmed but further
military preparations for St Domingo (or wherever) were in evidence.
There was talk in England that French commercial agents had surveyed
British and Irish harbours and defences. On March the 6th, Britain began
a partial rearmament in response on the 13th of March there occurred a
famous scene: At a Sunday afternoon drawing room review in front of 200
other guests Napoleon either staged or actually lost his temper and made
a scene. In a voice that everyone in the room could hear he raged, "So
you are determined to go to war." The English envoy, Whitworth, was
stunned at this impropriety and did not know how best to reply. Napoleon
then stormed off to complain further of British warmongering to the
Spanish and Russian ambassadors.

Britain was saying plainly that Malta would not be evacuated without
some concession on France's part. Whitworth could threaten 'Malta or
war' because he believed Napoleon was so determined over Malta that he
would offer concessions to obtain this object. One such concession would
have been the abandonment of Louisiana. On the 13th of April Monroe
arrived from the United States to negotiate the Louisiana purchase. The
transaction was completed on the 3rd of May and thus Napoleon gives
evidence that his hopes for overseas expansion were gone. The purchase
price of $15m (Spanish Dollars) USA 15 years bonds, (less nearly a third
deducted by USA for economic damages) was immediately on sold to Dutch
and ironically to British bankers at 87.5% raising $8.8m for the coming
war. This was a virtual a fire-sale! The Treaty of Amiens was signed on
March 25, 1802. The news arrived in London on the 29th. There was
intense relief and the populace now gratefully looked forward to falling
prices and rising prosperity. Much goodwill had been lost and many were
fatalistic or suspicious but peace had been achieved. However, a lack
of trust between Britain and France caused the collapse of the Peace of
Amiens in the late-spring of 1803. Indeed, by 1804 Napoleon's conduct in
Italy and Germany pushed Russia and Austria closer to an anti-French
alliance.

Here the drinking companions begin a quarrel: the French soldier draws
his sword, while John Bull falls on his back in the middle of his beer
and his ham. But with his broken oar (symbolizing the battered British
sea power) he threatens to strike back. He has in his hand a map of
Malta, and tramples on the Treaty of Amiens. The French has already
snatched Hanover. On the wall, a lion, symbolizing France, attacks the
English leopard. The turkey, on the counter, represents the English
sovereign, George III, who was identified with George Dandin, a Molière
character, a fool, who admits his folly while suggesting that wisdom
would not help him because, if things in fact go against us, it is
pointless to be wise.

"Plumb Pudding in Danger", James Gillray, 1805

William Pitt and Napoleon dividing the world between them. Pitt takes
the ocean: symbolically, his fork resembles a trident. Napoleon takes
Europe, with the exception of Britain, Sweden, and Russia. At
Trafalgar, the Royal Navy ensured its maritime supremacy for the rest
of the war by destroying a combined Franco-Spanish fleet. At
Austerlitz, Napoleon crushed an Austro-Russian army to become the
master of Europe for the next seven years.

John Bull worriedly inspects
the small workshop of Bonaparte, to see what the kid is up to. He is
carving and accumulating wooden vessels. Bull appears reassured because
the vessels are accumulated in the trash basket. But the viewer is not
fooled: the implications here are quite clear; John Bull will not notice
the mischievous action of Bonaparte, and England will sleep peacefully.

Bonaparte just crosses the
Channel. Britannia desperately opens her arms for help from doctors
(Addington and Hawkesbury) reminiscent of Shakespeare's Hamlet famous
line; "Angels and ministers of grace defend us!".

Their support is of no use, even if Addington tries to revive her with
gunpowder. Sheridan's patriotic attitude, who dressed as a clown here,
seems to be based on ulterior mercantile motives. As for Fox, with his
hat pulled over his eyes, he is unable to see the seriousness of the
situation. It appears that nobody assumes responsibility for the peace
treaty of Amiens, .

Napoleon's nocturnal dreams: the
massacre of Royalist insurgents during the 13th Vendemiaire, executions
of Jaffa, many victims seeking revenge. Bonaparte here is also accused
of having sacrificed his soldiers for fearful of being assassinated in a
turmoil. He is holding in his hand a map of Malta and England. Campaign
plans are on his nightstand.

“Boney bear Jemmy Wright, who shave as well as any Man, almost not quite.” 1806

Napoleon, as a barber, is shaving off the sovereigns of European
countries' hair and beards and is described in this cartoon as “shaver
general to most of the Sovereigns on the Continent.” The bleeding
Dutchman and the bleeding Emperor of Austria praise the closeness of
their shaves. The Dutchman says: “Yaw Mynheer very close shaver, its nix
my doll when you are used to it, ” and the German Hanover prince says:
“I hope he don’t mean to shave me as bare as he has you and my neighbor
Austria there? I should to sit here so quietly with my face lathered!!”
Francis I addresses John Bull whom is looking through the barber shop
window while passing by:“Come Johnny, come in and be shaved, don’t be
frightened at the size of the Razor, it cuts very clean I assure you!”.
Bull refuses the Emperor’s encouragement to enter and notes the gashes
and red marks left by the razor: “By Goes it seems and leaves a dom’d
sight of gashes behind as you and Mynheer can testify!!”. In the center
of the caricature, the Prussian king sits lathered waiting for his turn
to be shaved. He has a nervous expression on his face, and his right
hand clenches a paper titled “Plan of Hanover.” At the right of the
caricature, Napoleon and Talleyrand attack the Sultan of Turkey by
attempting to shave his beard. The Sultan tries to pull away:“By the
Holy Prophet I must not part with my beard. Why my people will not
acknowledge me for the grand Signor again at Constantinople!” Talleyrand
tries to calm him down: “Come, come don’t make such a fuss, and my
Master will cut away when he catches anybody in his shop,” and
Napoleon: “Lather away Talley I’ll soon ease him on his superflicities
and make him look like my Christian Customers.”.

Trial of Napoleon Bonaparte, George Cruikshank, 1813

This caricature sneers at Napoleon Bonaparte leaving his army on its
horrendous retreat from Moscow and for his betrayal of the ideals of
the French Revolution.

The Kings' Cake
being Cut at the Congress of Vienna (November 1814-June 1815), L. to R.
Emperor Francis I of Austria (1768-1835); King Frederick William III of
Prussia (1770-1840); Czar Alexander I of Russia (1777-1825); Joachim
Murat, king of Naples (1767-1815); Napoleon II, king of Rome
(1811-1832);

The
Capitulation, caricature of Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Perigord
(1754-1838) 30th March 1814, French School, (19th century)

Unique
in his own age and a phenomenon in any, the enigmatic Charles-Maurice,
Prince de Talleyrand, was a statesman of outstanding ability and
extraordinary contradictions. He was a world-class rogue who held high
office in five successive regimes. A well-known opportunist and a
notorious bribe taker, Talleyrand's gifts to France arguably outvalued
the vast personal fortune he amassed in her service. Once a supporter of
the Revolution, after the fall of the monarchy, he fled to England and
then to the United States. Talleyrand returned to France two years later
and served under Napoleon, and represented France at the Congress of
Vienna.

The Man with Six Heads', caricature of Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Perigord (1754-1838), 1815

The French diplomat and statesman Charles Maurice Talleyrand-Perigod is
portrayed as a man "floating with the tide". First published in 1815 as
"L'Homme aux six tetes. Le Nain jaune" (the six-headed man [referring to
Talleyrands prominent role in six different regimes: As Bishop of Autun
during the reign of Louis XVI, as a member of the National Convention
during the French Revolution, as Foreign Minister during the Directoire
Era, as Foreign Minister of Napoleon the Consul and Napoleon the Emperor
and finally as Foreign Minister and Minister President of the
re-established Bourbon Monarchy).

A representative of the clergy in the States-General of 1789, Talleyrand
sided with the revolutionists. He proposed the appropriation of church
lands by the state, endorsed the civil constitution of the clergy, and
was excommunicated (1791) by the pope after consecrating two
"constitutional" bishops. In 1792 he was sent by the National Assembly
on a mission to London to secure Great Britain's neutrality, but the
radical turn of the French Revolution nullified his success. A lifelong
advocate of constitutional monarchy and peace, Talleyrand sought refuge
in England in Sept., 1792, following the fall of the monarchy. In 1794
he went to the United States, where he stayed until after the
establishment (Nov., 1795) of the Directory in France, when he returned
(Sept., 1796) to Paris.

Peter V. Curl claims that Talleyrand's part in the Revolution was not
simply a question of opportunism, as many historians have claimed, but
that he was politically on the side of the revolutionaries. He explains
that Talleyrand served six successive governments on the basis that the
State was a "metaphysical concept" which had to be obeyed and served in
the most enlightened manner possible.
The diplomatic beginnings of Talleyrand's career go back to the Ancien
Régime. Talleyrand, according to Schroeder, "took it for granted that a
permanent place and a role for Austria should be found within the
international system, and he tried to come up with one which would
please Napoleon. Napoleon, very much a criminal with respect to
international politics, clearly did not see why he should be obliged to
grant any role whatsoever to Austria".

Negotiation at the Congress of Verona (1822)refusing to recognize the Greek declaration of independence

The Congress of Vienna established an international system of
reactionary governments dedicated to maintaining a set of European
boundaries, preventing revolutions and changes in government, and
stopping any one power from becoming too powerful. To this end, the
Congress powers agreed to meet whenever trouble should crop up in Europe
to discuss how to fix it. This Holy Alliance, appropriating the name of
the coalition of Christian values Alexander had wanted to set up at the
Congress of Vienna, was also called the Congress System, and aimed at
stopping any revolutionary attempt in any part of Europe. To deal with
the revolutionary trends, Metternich called the Congress of Verona in
1822. The congress moved against the Greek revolutionaries, who really
did not have the military power to take over Turkey at this time anyway.
The Congress also allowed France to send an army into Spain to end the
revolt and stabilize the Bourbon king. The revolution in Spain was
quickly smashed.

The Greeks were the most privileged minority in the Ottoman State, and
enjoyed substantial privileges. As H. Hearder states in his Europe in the Nineteenth Century, 1830-1880,
"European Turkey differed from the rest of the continent in one
significant respect. Whereas Christian governments in the rest of Europe
had permitted no Muslim communities, Christians had been officially
tolerated." The Greeks were also the most populous among the
non-Muslims, and under the system of "millet" the leader of the Orthodox
church, the Phanariot Patriarch, was always elected from the Greeks.
Therefore the whole of the Orthodox population, Bulgarians, Serbians,
Romanians, and Albanians were under Greek predominance. During the
Napoleonic Wars the the French revolutionary ideas came to Greece. After
defeating the Austrians in Italy in 1797, the French seized and then
annexed the Ionian Islands.

The Congress of Vienna

The Congress of Vienna did not have the features of a real Congress.
Although many European delegates arrived for the Congress, it never sat
as one. In fact, most of the business was discussed in private informal
sessions between the Big Four (Austria, Russia, Britain, and Prussia)
and France, or during decadent feasts and balls. One attendee, Prince de
Ligne, who was known for his wit, famously commented “Le Congres danse,
mais ne marche pas” (The Congress dances, but does not progress).Prince
Metternich’s network of spies, frequented salons (drawing rooms where
the intellectual, political, and social elite gathered to converse) and
intercepted letters, reading, copying, and re-sealing them, before
delegates began to catch on and took measures to prevent intelligence
from falling into Austrian hands.

At the congress, Metternich's mastery of diplomatic maneuvering earned
him the title of "the coachman of Europe." More than any other single
leader, he seemed to determine the future direction of the Continent.
One observer described him as "not a genius but a great talent; cold,
calm, imperturbable, and a supreme calculator." Metternich's main goal
at the congress was to promote the idea of the "Concert of Europe": if
all the great powers acted together or in "concert," they would be able
to prevent the outbreak of any large European war like the Napoleonic
Wars. They might also be able to see that "the foundations of a lasting
peace are secured as much as possible."
The Congress did have a positive and lasting impact on European history.
The peace treaty signed on June 9, 1815 resulted in what Henry
Kissinger called the longest period of peace Europe has ever known. It
was also “the first international peace conference to discuss
humanitarian issues” and resulted in a condemnation of the slave trade,
and discussions on literary piracy and the civil rights of Jews.

The inconveniences of a crowded drawing room", George Cruikshank, 1818

Thomas Rowlandson (1756-1827) preferred to deal with socio-cultural
issues and satirize morals. Rowlandson worked with Tobias George
Smollett, whose radical books resulted in him being sent to prison for
libel. Some of Rowlandson's political cartoons also got him in trouble
and he was accused by his critics of being "coarse and indelicate".

A yokel in a long smock stands before three elderly Justices of Peace.
One of the justices says, How dare you Fellow to say it is unfair to
bring you before one hundred Magistrates when you see there are but
three of us.
The yokel tugs at his hair and replies, Why please your Worship you mun
know – when I went to school they taught I that a one and two O’s stood
for a hundred – so do you see your Worship be One and the other two be
Cyphers!

By the nineteenth century, there were three types of courts for a
criminal to be brought to justice: Magistrates' Courts ( Quarter
Sessions and Petty Sessions), Assize Courts, and the Court of King's (or
Queen's) Bench. Courts of Petty Sessions were introduced in the 18th
century as there was too much work for the Quarter Sessions (which only
met four times a year) to handle. At this time the county of Essex was
split into administrative units known as Hundreds. Each Hundred covered a
number of parishes. For each Hundred there was a Petty Sessions which
dealt with minor criminal offences. Petty Sessions dealt with minor
cases such as drunkenness, poaching and vagrancy. After the Summary
Jurisdiction Act of 1848, all summary trials had to take place at
formally constituted Petty Sessions, before at least two magistrates.
Meetings became more regular and laws passed that required the
proceedings to be recorded.

American Revolution

Lord North,
Edmund Burke, Charles Fox, the Prince of Wales, and others attempting to
break into the royal treasury. Political cartoon by unidentified
illustrator from 1787.

Lord North was Prime Minister of Great Britain from January, 1770 to
March, 1782. His early successes as Leader of the House and his efforts
to cut the national debt brought him the confidence of a faction-ridden
Parliament and the favor and friendship of King George III. But his
failure to subdue the American colonies and the subsequent loss of the
Revolutionary War brought an end to his ministry and forever darkened
his name in history.
For the first three years of the North ministry, the American colonies
appeared calm. North had decided to retain the duty on tea imported into
the American colonies. The colonists were of course angered by what
they saw as an encroachment upon their own legislatures'
prerogatives.Lord North's efforts to rescue the East India Tea Company
from bankruptcy lead to the Boston Tea Party. Under the original
proposal, the surplus inventories of tea would be shipped directly to
the colonies. Consignees would be appointed to sell the tea in America.
The duty on tea would have been removed. North, however, was unwilling
to remove the tea duty. In May of 1773, the Tea Act passed the House of
Commons with little opposition.

As information about the Tea Act filtered into the colonies, public
opinion changed from placid to bitter resentment. In Boston, the first
tea shipment arrived in November. Patriots would not allow the ship to
unload its cargo, and the despised governor of Massachusetts, Thomas
Hutchinson, would not permit the ship to sail from the harbor without
paying the duty. The impasse came to an end on the night of 16 December
when Boston patriots, dressed as Indians, boarded the ship and dumped
the tea chest into Boston harbor.
Word of the Boston Tea Party reached London on 20 January, 1774. Public
opinion turned sharply against the colonists, especially Boston. The
news was received bitterly by the North ministry. A policy of coercion
was decided upon and Lord North drafted into legislation the Coercive
Acts.
Lord North intended on making a lesson of Massachusetts with the belief
that the other colonies would not support her, but his assumptions were
wrong. The moderates in the other colonies pledged their support to
Massachusetts and called for a Continental Congress.
Tensions mounted between the colonies and Great Britain. General Thomas
Gage, now governor of the insolent colony of Massachusetts, warned in
his letters of the impossibility of enforcing the Massachusetts
Government Act without additional troops.
By December, North realized that Great Britain was on the verge of war
with her colonies. In January, he proposed a peace commission. He
offered to eliminate the tea tax so long as the colonies promised to pay
the salaries of civil authorities regularly. But it was too late.
Events now overtook the hope of a peaceful reconciliation. On 16 April,
1775, a skirmish on the Lexington Green between Gage's troops and
patriots transformed the American crisis into the American war. Bunker
Hill followed later that summer. Lord North was forced to declare the
colonies in a state of rebellion.

British officers,
in a child-like manner, demonstrate skills in hopes of securing a
command for the war with the American colonies. Library of Congress
Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C.

Britannia lamenting her present state, her shield and broken lance by
her side, "What a situation am I in sold by an American purchased by
France Spain. Oh, wheres my Pitt." Four men are standing before her,
from left, an American holding in his right hand a lance topped with
liberty cap and in his left a sword with which he threatens her, next a
Frenchman urges him to "frighten her." A Spaniard is standing next to
the Frenchman with his back to Britannia, he wears a low hat and a
cloak, and on the far right is a Dutchman. Library of Congress Prints
and Photographs Division Washington, D.C.

This Gillray etching is a satire on the suspension of gold payments by
the Bank of England. Prime minister William Pitt was forced to
implement the issue of paper money when the Bank announced a gold
shortage, due to loans it had made to finance the war with France.
Rumors circulated that the Bank's coin was merely being held in reserve
to send to the Continent in support of the war. Hence the significance
of the locked chest, and the coins in the pockets of the lady's paper
money dress.

In Gillray's cartoon, he nicknamed the Bank of England the "Old Lady of
Threadneedle Street", the first recorded use of the nickname. The tag
has stuck ever since – and in his satire, Political Ravishment, the Old
Lady's in danger. "Murder! Murder!" she cries. "Rape! Murder! O you
villain! What, have I kept my honour so long to have it broke up by you
at last? O murder! Rape! Ravishment! Ruin! Ruin! Ruin!!!"

The Able Doctor, or America Swallowing the Bitter Draught. 1774. London Magazine. British Cartoon Collection.

Following the colonists’ defiant display at the Boston Tea Party, the
majority of England was surprised, bewildered, and angered by the
colonists’ actions. After much debate in the Parliament, King George III
assumed an active role in deciding punishment for the rebellious and
costly colonists by personally advising Lord North, the Prime Minister
of Britain at the time. This resulted in the “Coercive Acts,” passed in
March 1774, which were intended to quell the colonists and force them
into submission.

VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION 1775
Lord Bute aiming a blunderbuss at a man representing colonial America; a
member of Parliament, pointing at the American, tells Bute "I give you
that man's money for my use", to which the American responds by saying,
"I will not be robbed". On the right, blindfolded, Britannia is about to
stumble into "The pit prepared for others" while behind her, in the
background, "The English Protestant town of Boston" is in flames. On the
left kneels a monk holding a gibbet and a cross, behind him stands a
Frenchman with sword raised; perched on a cliff and forming the backdrop
to Bute, the monk, and the Frenchman, is the city of Quebec.

James Gillray, 1783. The Times. American Revolution Print

This cartoon relates to The Treaty of Paris, which marks the official
end of The American Revolutionary War, in which Satan is depicted flying
away with a Map of America in his hands. Dutch, French, and Spanish
leaders are also represented, with the Rock of Gibraltar in the
background.

Count de Rochambeau, French General of the Land Forces in America Reviewing the French, 1781
Comte de Rochambeau played a major role in helping America win
independence during the American Revolution. He is considered to be one
of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America for his role in
winning the Revolutionary War and securing American independence from
Britain.

The presidential election of 1800 is generally considered the nastiest
in American history. The race between Federalist John Adams and
Republican Thomas Jefferson was raucous, bitter, and unpredictable. The
Adams' Federalists were divided and made a poor campaign. According to
the Constitution, presidential electors were required to vote for two
persons without indicating which office each was to fill, the one
receiving the highest number of votes to be President and the candidate
standing next to be Vice President. In the 1796 election Adams had
defeated Jefferson in the Electoral College, but only by the narrow
margin of 71 to 68. With the second most votes Jefferson became vice
president with no responsibilities besides presiding over the Senate.
Adams sought to involve Jefferson in his new administration, but
Jefferson declined any participation.
In the election of 1800, Aaron Burr, the Republican candidate for Vice
President, had received the same number of votes as Jefferson; as
neither had a majority the election was thrown into the House of
Representatives, where the Federalists held the balance of power.
Although it was well known that Burr was not even a candidate for
President, his friends and many Federalists began intriguing for his
election to that high office. Had it not been for the vigorous action of
Hamilton the prize might have been snatched out of Jefferson’s hands.
Not until the thirty-sixth ballot on February 17, 1801, was the great
issue decided in his favor.

Peter Pencil, Intercourse or Impartial Dealings, 1809

President Jefferson is being held up for money by Napoleon and King
George. Critics of Jefferson believed that he had paid too much for
Louisiana and was prepared to pay too much for the Floridas. This
cartoon also satirizes the failure of Jefferson's use of the embargo and
restrictions on trade as a curb on French and British depredations of
American shipping.

Cruikshank, The Happy Effects of that Grand System of Shutting Ports Against the English, 1808

President Jefferson stands on a dais addressing a group of disgruntled
Members of Congress. Before Jefferson is a table covered with papers
inscribed 'Pettition and Pettition New York'. Napoleon is hiding behind
Jefferson's presidential chair whispering; "You shall be King
hereafter". Jefferson addresses the assembly: "Citizens - I am sorry I
cannot call you my Lords Gentlemen!! - This is a Grand Philosophical
Idea - shutting our Ports against the English - if we continue the
Experiment for about fifteen or twenty years, we may begin then to feel
the good 'Effects' - in the mean time to prevent our sailors from being
idle. I would advise you to imploy them in various works of husbandry
and by that means we may gain the protection of that great and mighty
Emperor King Napoleon!! A small dog, John 'Bull' (its collar so
inscribed), barks "Bow Wow" at the President. The Congressmen say: "How
are we to Dispose of our produce; My warehouses are full; Yea friend
thou may as well tell us to cut of our nose to be revenged of our face
[a Quaker in a broad-brimmed hat]; My famely is Starving'; my Goods are
Spoiling; It was not the case in Great Washintons time; we must speak to
him in more 'forceble language'.

"

William Charles, "A Boxing Match, or Another Bloody Nose for John Bull," Lithograph, New York, 1813.

The Anglo-American War of 1812 or the American'Second War for
Independence, was directly related to the Napoleonic conflict. In
British eyes the Americans had stabbed them in the back while they they
were fighting Napoleon. Britain relied on a maritime economic blockade
to defeat France. When American merchants tried to breach this blockade,
the British introduced new laws, the ‘Orders in Council’, to block
them, and when British warships stopped American merchant ships, they
forcibly impressed any British sailors they found into the Royal Navy.

James Madison's Tax Policies During the War of 1812 .

Madison holds an iron rod bearing a banner which proclaims the War of
1812 popular slogan “Free Trade Sailors Rights.” The downtrodden
taxpayer on whose back Madison stands replies,

“None of your Boesting / Mr. Jammy say I / Tax, Tax upon our / Backs is
the unanimous cry / it was by your Iron Rod that / we became Rule’d. /
Till every Cent out of / our Pockets is foold.”

James Madison (1751-1836) was the principal architect of the United
States Constitution, the Secretary of State under President Thomas
Jefferson, and the fourth president of the United States. As
president, Madison continued to support aggressive trade measures
against Britain and requested a declaration of war against Great Britain
in 1812 when commercial pressure failed to achieve a change in British
policy. The war expenses added to the economic problems, and Congress
was forced to find additional sources for funding. Taxes on houses,
land, and slaves were enacted in 1813, 1815, and 1816, with additional
duties on liquor licenses, auction sales, carriages, and refined sugar,
among other items.
During the War of 1812, Madison faced almost treasonous opposition from
merchants and public officials in New England. But he refused to limit
civil liberties or declare martial law, as he was urged to do by
supporters

President James Madison fleeing from Washington, D.C., which is being burned by the British, during the War of 1812.

Reaching Washington on the evening of August 24, the British found a
city largely deserted, with the only resistance being ineffective sniper
fire from one house. The first order of business for the British was to
attack the navy yard, which they burned.
British troops next arrived at the US Capitol, which was still
unfinished. According to later accounts, the British were impressed by
the fine architecture of the building, and some of the officers had
qualms about burning it.
According to legend, Admiral Cockburn sat in the chair belonging to the
Speaker of the House and asked, "Shall this harbor of Yankee democracy
be burned?" The British Marines with him yelled "Aye!" Orders were given
to torch the building.
The British troops worked diligently to set fires inside the Capitol,
destroying years of work by artisans brought from Europe. With the
burning Capitol lighting the sky, troops also marched to burn an armory.
At about 10:30 pm, approximately 150 Royal Marines formed up in columns
and began marching westward on Pennsylvania Avenue, following the route
used in modern times for inauguration day parades. The British troops
moved quickly, with a particular destination in mind.
By that time President James Madison had fled to safety in Virginia,
where he would meet up with his wife and servants from the president's
house.

A figurative portrayal of the presidential race of 1824. A crowd of
cheering citizens watch as candidates (left to right) John Quincy Adams,
William Crawford, and Andrew Jackson stride toward the finish. Henry
Clay has dropped from the race and stands, hand on head, on the far
right saying, "D--n it I cant save my distance--so I may as well "draw
up."" He is consoled by a man in riding clothes, "Well dont distress
yourself--there'll be some scrubbing by & then you'll have a
chance."
Assorted comments come from the crowd, reflecting various sectional and
partisan views.
A Westerner with stovepipe hat and powder horn: "Hurra for our
Jacks-"son."" Former President John Adams: "Hurra for our son "Jack.""
Two men in coachmen's livery: "That inne-track fellow [Crawford] goes so
well; that I think he must have got the better of the bots [boss?]."
and "Like enough; but betwixt you I--I dont think he'll ever get the
better of the "Quinsy.""
A ragged Irishman: "Blast my eyes if I dont "venter" a "small" horn of
rotgut on that "bald filly" in the middle [Adams]."
A Frenchman: "Ah hah! Mon's Neddy I tink dat kick on de "back of you
side" is worse den have no dinner de fourt of july."
In the left background is a platform and an inaugural scene, the
"Presidential Chair" with a purse "$25,000 per Annum" (center) and an
imaginative portrayal of the Capitol in the distance.

The major figures in American national politics in 1838 are gently
satirized, each characterized as riding a favorite issue or
"hobbyhorse." At the lead (far left) is President Martin Van Buren,
riding a horse "Sub-Treasury," which he calls his "Old Hickory nag." The
artist refers to Van Buren's independent treasury program, a system
whereby federal funds were to be administered by revenue-collecting
agencies or local "sub-treasuries" rather than by a national bank. The
Independent Treasury Bill was perceived as an outgrowth of predecessor
Jackson's anti-Bank program.
Another hobbyhorse, "United States Bank" (center), is shared by Whig
senators Henry Clay and Daniel Webster, leaders of congressional
opposition to Jackson and Van Buren's respective fiscal agendas. Clay
says, "Either you or I must get off Dan, for this horse wont carry
double!" Webster responds, "Dash my Whig if I get off Hal!"
Directly behind Van Buren Democratic Senator Thomas Hart Benton rides a
horse "Specie Currency," an allusion to Benton's championing of hard
money economics. Benton was identified with administration efforts to
curb the use of currency in favor of "specie" or coin, and to increase
the ratio of gold to silver in circulation. He says, "My Golden Poney
carries more weight than any of them!"
Behind Clay and Webster is South Carolina senator John C. Calhoun,
advocate of state's rights and the driver of Southern nullification of
the "Tariff of Abominations."
On the right are William Henry Harrison, in military uniform and riding
an "Anti-Masonic" hobby, and Massachusetts Congressman John Quincy Adams
on his "Abolition" mount. Harrison's horse is named after the party
which supported his 1836 bid for the Presidency. When he says, ". . .
unless there is another Morgan abduction, I'm afraid he'll [the horse]
lose his wind!" he alludes to the suspicious 1826 death of William
Morgan (purportedly at the hands of Masons) which fueled considerable
anti-Masonic sentiment in the United States. Adams laments, "This horse,
instead of being my Topaz, is my Ebony."

This 1859 Punch cartoon is captioned ''What? You young Yankee-noodle, strike your own father!''

The "Citizen King" and the Royal Pear: The case against Charles Philipon

After the Revolution of July 1830 Charles Philipon (1800-1862), a
caricaturist and a talented journalist , founded La Caricature, the
first modern illustrated satirical weekly paper. During four years of
its publication, the paper was constantly prosecuted, fined, and
censored. In 1832, before La Caricature's closure Philipon started a
daily paper, Le Charivari , which printed a new drawing every day.
Philipon frequently criticized King Louis-Phillipe the "Citizen King"
whose pear-shaped head he exploited to the full in the Poire Royale or
the Royal Pear series. He wound up in jail several times. The pear
quickly became the commonly-recognized symbol of Louis-Phillipe and his
entire regime. At the time, in France calling a person a pear was
tantamount to calling him a buffoon. As part of his defense, Philipon
sketched a series of drawings that transformed the king’s head into a
pear. He explained that if the king’s face resembled a pear, then all
pears should be subject to a fine. The sarcastic tone of Philipon’s
argument was lost on the judge who charged Philipon with a fine of two
thousands francs and six months in jail. But the artist was unrepentant
and on November 17, 1831, three days after the trial, La Caricature
published an account of the proceedings, and in the following week,
Philipon published the drawings from the trial as a lithograph. However,
the issue was seized by the government.

Charles Philipon's account of the court proceedings with respect to his portrayal of King Louis-Phillipe as a pear.

Here is a translation; THE PEARS , Made in the Paris Court of Assizes by
the Director of LA CARICATURE. Sold to pay the 6000 francs fine of the
newspaper Le Charivari. At the request of a large number of
subscribers, we present today in Le Charivari, the pears which served
as our defense in the case where La Caricature was sentenced to six
months’ imprisonment and a 2,000 francs fine. If, to recognize the
monarch in a cartoon, you do not expect it to have a resemblance, you
will fall into the absurd [?]. Look at these shapeless sketches, to
which I limited my defense.
[Beneath the 1st drawing] This sketch looks like a Louis-Philippe, do you condemn it?
[Beneath the 2nd drawing] Then we must condemn this one, which resembles the first.
[Beneath the 3rd drawing] Then condemn another, which resembles the second.
[Beneath the 4th drawing] And finally, if you are consistent, you can
not absolve this pear, which resembles the preceding sketch.
Thus, a pear, a bun, and all the grotesque heads in which chance has
maliciously placed this sad resemblance, you can inflict on the author
five years imprisonment and a fine of five thousand francs!! Admit it,
gentlemen, this is a peculiar freedom of the press!!

Gargantua, Honoré Daumier , 1831

One of the most important political cartoonists in Philipon's paper was
Honoré Daumier (1808-1879). In late 1831 the publishing business La
Maison Aubert submitted one of his cartoons "Gargantua" to the "depot
legal" for publication and put it on display in the window of the shop.
It was soon seized, along with other prints done by Daumier, by the
Paris police. They ordered the owner of the publishing house to destroy
the lithographic stone and all the remaining proofs. In February 1932
Daumier, the owner of the publishing house, and the printer, were all
brought to trial for arousing hatred and contempt of the king's
government, and for offending the king's person. In the trial the
argument was over whether "Gargantua" represented the king personally
or if it was a symbolic representation of the king's swollen budget.
All three of the men were convicted, but only Daumier served a prison
term.

Philipon's example was followed all over Europe. In 1841 Punch, in
Britain was established which introduced cartoonists such as John Leech
(1817-1864) and John Tenniel (1820-1914), Harry Furniss (1854-1925).
(Edward) Linley Sambourne (1844-1910), Bernard Partridge (1861-1945),
and, Leonard Raven-Hill (1867-1942). In 1848 Kladderadatsch was
established in Berlin followed by Die fliegende Blätter in 1845, and
later on Punsch and Simplicissimus, in Munich. Simplicissimus introduced
cartoonists like Olaf Gulbransson, Bruno Paul, Thomas Theodor Heine,
and Blix

Friedrich Wilhelm IV doesn't
accept the crown offered by the Frankfurt Parliament. The cartoon shows
the allegorical Germania reprimanding the democratic leader Heinrich von
Gagern: "What are you whimpering about, you little jack in the box?" to
which he replies: "I've carved your little one a crown and he doesn't
want it!"

The February 1848 revolution in France, that had overthrew the monarchy
of Louis Philippe and established the Second Republic, had also
triggered a series of uprisings in South West Germany, spreading
unevenly but rapidly to many other German lands and aiming to replace
perceived injustices of the old, existing order. Popular grievances,
which sustained the insurrections,
differed from state to state in accordance with diverse conditions, but
they usually included economic deprivation, a desire to abolish
seigneurial dues and privileges, resentment of taxes, criticism of
officialdom, an expectation of legality and equality before the law, a
call for political rights of free assembly, association,
speech and conscience, and the demand for a representative government
and assembly.

In 1848, National Assembly in Frankfurt was preoccupied with the
minutiae of the constitution, including its prefatory declaration of
basic rights, but they were, in effect, debating the form which the new
Nationalstaat should take.The creation of a nation-state, it was widely
believed, required the erection of a suitable political superstructure
to suit a pre-existing national culture. The movement of history towards
unification seemed inevitable and natural. Friedrich Wilhelm IV linked
constitutional and parliamentary concessions to the greater cause of the
German nation, but having concurred in the imposition of a conservative
Prussian constitution, he proceeded on 28 April 1849 to reject the
title of ‘Kaiser of the Germans’, which he had already confided
privately had a ‘whorish smell of revolution’.

Metternich flees Vienna, March 1848

The revolutions of 1848 ignited the countries of Europe in a way that
would not be repeated until 1989. Violence broke out because legal and
parliamentary movements for change were frustrated. The only countries
where revolution was avoided were those where adequate concessions were
made in time, such as Great Britain, Belgium, and the Netherlands, or
where opposition was negligible, such as Russia. Nobilities and middle
classes demanded constitutional and representative instead of arbitrary
and bureaucratic government. The revolution in France transformed German
politics. A mass demonstration at Mannheim on 27 February and a march
on Karlsruhe, the capital of Baden forced Grand Duke Leopold to concede a
free press, trial by jury, and a people's militia on 29 February, and
to appoint liberal ministers on 2 March.

The revolution in Vienna on 13-15 March 1848, as well as the revolution
in Paris, helps to explain why Frederick William IV stooped to make
concessions.The Lower Austrian Estates, which met on 13 March, were
besieged by students and workers, from inside and outside the city
walls, to urge them to press for reforms. Finally Metternich, the "last
great master of the principle of balance," became the target of angry
mobs. Forced to resign, he went into exile in England before returning
to Vienna in 1858. He died there a year later.

Since 1866, when Prussia had defeated Austria and won the leadership in
Germany, Napoleon III of the Second French Empire had longed to crush
Prussia, which he considered an upstart power. Meanwhile Bismarck, the
chancellor of Prussia, felt that a war was necessary to unify Germany
The Franco-Prussian War, waged between France and the German states
under the leadership of Prussia, from July 15, 1870, dramatically
changed European history. The rapid and overwhelming victory of Prussia
in this conflict made possible the creation of a unified German Empire.
Prussian would first fight and destroy the armies of the emperor
Napoleon, then the newly raised armies of the Third republic. The war
also marked the final step in Germany's rise to the position of a major
continental power . Napoleon III surrendered to Wilhelm I, king of
Prussia, on Sept. 2, 1870, after the battle at Sedan. The battle marked
the decisive defeat of the French in the Franco-Prussian War and led to
the fall of the Second French Empire, which was replaced by the Third
Republic. As part of the settlement, the territory of Alsace-Lorraine
was taken by Germany, which would retain it until after World War I. The
war provided a rich range of characters for the caricaturists of that
era.

The capitulation of Sedan, Honoré Daumier, 1870

Louis Bonaparte Napoleon III and Wilhelm l of Prussia, 1870.

The two are depicted as drunken buffoons, betraying the moral and spiritual ideals fought for in the French Revolution.

Un Bain de Sang! Napoléon Charles Louis De Frondat, 1870

The German Emperor, Wilhelm I, sitting in a tub of blood with the head
of the French Emperor Napoleon III. The title reads; Bloodbath, you see
it will drown both of us!

This Kladderadatsch cartoon by Wilhelm Scholz is entitled “Good Advice
is Costly” [“Guter Rath is theuer”]. The caption reads: “Bismarck
(leading Alsace and Lorraine): Dear Reichstag, we have the two lads back
again, but now tell me where and how we should accommodate them!” While
Bavaria would have happily taken over custodianship of the two
provinces seized from France in 1871, this cartoon correctly foresees a
struggle for authority between Germania (representing Germany’s martial
origins) and the Reichstag, whose members saw an opportunity to import
newer, liberal traditions into the governance of the territories.
Agreement on a constitution for Alsace-Lorraine was achieved very
belatedly in Imperial Germany – in 1911.

Alexandre Dumas, André Gill, Cover of La Lune, December 2, 1866

Dumas' caricature is from The Man of the Day series by André Gill, who
became known for his work for the weekly four-sheet newspaper La Lune,
edited by Francis Polo. Gill worked for La Lune from 1865 to 1868. When
La Lune was banned, he worked for the periodical L'Éclipse from 1868 to
1876. Gill also drew for famous periodical Le Charivari. In 1823,
Alexandre Dumas, who was of a mixed race aristocratic background,
became the clerk of the Duc d`Orléans -- later King Louis Philippe,
because of his elegant handwriting. But, he was liberal and had
republican sympathies, as he greeted the Revolution of 1848 with
enthusiasm and even ran as a candidate for the Assembly. After the coup
d'état in 1851 and the seizure of power by Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte,
Napoleon III, Dumas escaped to Brussels, as he was not looked upon
favorably by the newly elected President. Dumas supported Victor Hugo
who was also a liberal opponent of Napoleon III and was exiled by him.

The late 1840s and early 1850s were a period of feverish political
change. The revolution of 1848 felled the Orleans monarchy and led to
the creation of the Second Republic—which, in turn, led to the brief
elected presidency, and subsequent installation as emperor, of Napoleon
III. In the 1850s, as the old Paris of narrow streets and ramshackle
houses gave way to the broad boulevards and uniform apartment blocks
planned by Napoleon III and carried out by Georges-Eugène Haussmann,
Charles Baudelaire wrote an epitaph for the city he remembered:

I think of a negress, wasted, consumptive, trudging the mud, wild eyed,
looking for faraway palms of glorious Africa behind an immense wall of
fog; of whoever has lost what can never be found again, ever! of those
steeped in tears, suckling Pain like a kind she-wolf; of starved orphans
dried like flowers!
So in the forest of my mind’s exile an old Memory sounds a clear note on
the horn! I think of sailors lost on desert islands, of prisoners, of
the vanquished! . . . and of still others!

— Charles Baudelaire, Les Fleurs du mal,
“Tableaux parisiens

In 1863 Charles Baudelaire wrote three essays on caricature, ‘ On the
Essence of Laughter ’, ‘ Some French Caricaturists ’, and ‘ Some Foreign
Caricaturists ’, in which he provided perhaps the first sustained
defense of
the value of caricature as a serious art, worthy of study in its own
right. From the theory of the comic formulated in De l'essence du rire
to his discussions of Daumier, Goya, Hogarth, Cruikshank, Bruegel,
Grandville, Gavarni, Charlet, and many others, Baudelaire suggested that
exaggeration reveals what lies beneath the surface of society. It needs
to be exposed so that the ‘darker workings of human nature can be dealt
with’ ‘The painter [...] will be he who can extract from the
present-day life it’s epic quality, and make us see and understand [...]
how great and poetic we are in our in our cravats and patent leather
boots’ Baudelaire divided caricature into two types: i). the
significative comic who parodied human behavior in polite society whose
reliance was on a mere observation of social facts, who is in effect
honouring, instead of challenging the status quo, and; ii). the absolute
comic , who is driven by the grotesque, revealing a malicious intent,
who relied upon the hysterical laughter, that is more interesting, and
makes a stronger point . ‘He locates its origin in what he calls
satanic laughter, or the feeling of superiority one gets when laughing
at the misfortune of others’

For Baudelaire the art of modern life with its characteristics;
grotesque, ironic, violent, farcical, fantastic, and fleeting reveals
what lies beneath the surface of society. This caricatural aesthetic
needs to be exposed so that the ‘darker workings of human nature can be
dealt with’. Fascinated by the dualism and ambiguity of laughter, in
relation to human types that he viewed as allegorical figures full of
the experience of modern times that could be represented by a pictorial
shorthand, of symbolic meaning and moral value, he insisted that this
representation has radical implications for such emblems of modernity as
the city and the flâneur who roams the streets.

‘The modern city is the space of the comic, a kind of caricature,
presenting the flâneur , like the laugher, with an image of his own
dualism, self- ignorance, and otherness’.

The modern city is the space of the comic, a kind of caricature,
presenting the flaneur with an image of dualism, one's position as
subject and object, implicated in the same urban experiences one seems
to control. This idea that one’s experience of life, of existing in a
place and contributing to the allegory of a culture invests the idea of
modernity with a give and take. If you are both the laugher and the
object of laughter you prevent the ‘subjective construction and
appropriation of the world’ that is referred to as modernism.
In this vain, the theory of the comic invests the idea of modernity with
reciprocity, one's status as laughter and object of laughter, thus
preventing the subjective construction and appropriation of the world
that has so often been linked with the project of modernism.

‘Comic art reflects what Walter Benjamin later defined as Baudelairean
allegory, at once representing and revealing the alienation of modern
experience’. For Baudelaire the caricature and the grotesque are not
only a visual phenomenon but one of allegory, forms of endless
combinations and implausible hybrids. It might be possible, as Walter
Benjamin suggested after Baudelaire, that allegory, could take over the
role of abstract thought . An allegory is a narrative which has both a
literal meaning and a representative one. There are two main types of
allegory: i). the historical or political, in which historical persons
and events are referred to; and; ii). the allegory of ideas, in which
abstract concepts and the story has a didactic purpose. Baudelaire
transforms the dualism of the comic into a peculiarly modern unity---
the doubling of the comic artist enacted for the benefit of the
audience, the self-generating and self-reflexive experience of the
flaneur in a ''communion'' with the crowd.

Le Chevalier de la Mort (The knight of death),
caricature of the German Kaiser Wilhelm 1871. The objects of quite a
number of biting caricatures by French artists were the Prussian efforts
to become one of the Great Powers in Europe and Bismarck's endeavors to
unite the German Reich. The goals of the German politicians were to be
revealed with physiognomic and phrenological means.

L'Homme A La Boule, Jules Renard, 1871. Count Otto
von Bismarck balances on a the world with one spurred foot entering
France, and wearing only his underpants which are marked with the German
imperial eagle.

Having secured the creation of a united German Empire following the
successful outcome of the Franco-Prussian War in 1871, Bismarck was keen
to consolidate Germany's position via the construction of alliances
with other major powers.In so doing Bismarck was acknowledging that
France would remain a threat, one set upon avenging her humiliating
defeat in ceding Alsace and Lorraine to Germany at the conclusion of the
1870-71 war.

Bismarck set about the establishment of numerous alliances with, in
1873, the creation of the Three Emperors League. This agreement tied
Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia to each other's aid in time of war.
The agreement however only lasted until 1878 with Russia's withdrawal;
Bismarck then agreed a new Dual Alliance with Austria-Hungary in 1879.
The Courts of Austria-Hungary, of Germany, and of Russia, animated by an
equal desire to consolidate the general peace by an understanding
intended to assure the defensive position of their respective States,
have come into agreement on certain questions.

A German cartoon illustrates what it believed to be the hypocrisy of the
British forcing a reluctant China to buy its opium from the Opium Wars
of 1839 - 1842.

Bismarck offers slices of Africa to European powers at the Berlin conference.

Bismarck’s life’s work was the unification, through conquest and treaty,
of an archipelago of German-speaking states (with the conspicuous
exception of Austria). In 1870 Prussia humiliated France in the
Franco-German War. Bismarck’s army took Emperor Napoleon III prisoner
and starved Paris into submission. The Prussians did a triumphal march
through the streets of Paris. Bismarck was on a roll. In 1871 the
hold-out states of southern Germany joined a Prussian-led federation
with Kaiser Wilhelm I as head of state. In many ways this prosperous new
country was authoritarian, but it was also a democracy with active
political parties.
Even in the flush of triumph, however, the master politician saw
problems ahead. As Prussia expanded and became Germany, it lost its
original character – a highly-centralised, largely Protestant state.
Catholics – mostly in the Rhineland, southern Germany and in the
Polish-speaking East – now constituted about a third of the new nation.
Bismarck believed that he needed to press hard for unity of language,
religion and education, drawing all of society under government control.

Caricature
"Between Berlin and Rome" from Kladderadatsch, 16 May 1875. The caption
reads:
"The last move was certainly very unpleasant for me; but that doesn't
yet mean the game is lost. I have one more very fine move up my sleeve!"
"It will also be the last, and then you are mated in a few moves - at
least for Germany."

Although Prussia was an authoritarian society without a bill of rights,
it was not a dictatorship. Harsh restrictions on Catholics were passed
democratically after debates in a parliament. Prussia’s progressive
intellectual elite supported something which was clearly unjust:
suppression of freedom of religion in the name of protecting freedom of
thought.
In 1864 Pope Pius IX published the Syllabus, a denunciation of the
errors of modern thought, and in 1870 the First Vatican Council
proclaimed papal infallibility. The infallibility was interpreted as an
attack on the principle of secular government. To Bismarck, the troubled
reign of Pius IX seemed like a golden moment to assert control.
In July 1871 the assault began with the abolition of the Catholic bureau
of worship and control of government-Church relations was handed over
to Protestant bureaucrats. In November Bismarck passed the
Kanzelparagraph (the Pulpit Law) which severely penalised criticism of
the government by the clergy. In March 1872, all schools were placed
under government control. In July 1872 the Jesuits (and later other
religious orders) were expelled or interned. In December 1872 he broke
off diplomatic relations with the Vatican.
The pressure on Catholics intensified in May 1873 with the so-called May
Laws (or Falk Laws). These were four drastic measures designed to crush
the hierarchy and subject the Church totally to government control. At
the same time, Bismarck fostered relations with the Old Catholics and
tried to establish them as an alternative to the Catholic hierarchy.
In 1875 the fight intensified. A “Breadbasket Bill” was passed which
suspended all grants to dioceses if the clergy had not complied with the
new laws. All religious orders were dissolved, except socially useful
ones involved in nursing and social work. Civil marriage was made
obligatory. All Church property was confiscated and ownership was
transferred to parish laymen acting as trustees.
By 1878 the Catholic Church appeared to be in a sorry state. Most of its
bishops were in exile; thousands of parishes had no priest. It had lost
most of its property and power. But in fact Bismarck’s Kulturkampf had
run out of steam and most of his measures were about to be dismantled.
Although Papal infallibility had not been popular with many German
Catholics, nearly all of them closed ranks and presented a united front.
In 1870 Catholics formed the Centre Party under the leadership first of
Hermann von Mallinckrodt and then of Ludwig Windthorst, two politicians
who were remarkable for their eloquence and shrewdness. Their party
grew rapidly into a major political force.

While Chamberlain cries out that the
Indian cloth of the royal mantle is on
fire - a reference to the outbreak of
nationalist violence in India in 1897 - two
English officers gleefully stamp it out. Britain's army was mindful of
how events spiralled out of country in the lead up to the 1857 Mutiny
and decided to become more proactive in using force with even minor
political disturbances.

The succession of Queen Victoria by her son King Edward did little to stem the
flow of antaganostic commentary on the British role in the Boer War.
This cartoon shows
"Baby" Edward, a male version of his squat mother, viewing the blood
oozing from the South African section of his new toy, the world.

"Cry 'Havoc!' and let slip the dogs of war." This words are said by Mark
Antony to Caesar's corpse in Shakespeare's Julius Cesar. English
foreign policy was described as "splendid isolationism", a policy of
remaining aloof from alliances with other powers while exercising its
influence to encourage a balance of power on the continent. So long as
the continental powers checked each other, England was secure on the
other side of the Channel.

Throughout much of the 19th century, Russia seemed to pose the greatest
challenge to English imperial interests. Periodic Russian expansion
towards the Balkans and the Straits of the Dardanelles (the Ottoman
Empire) posed a potential threat to the English trade route to India.
English and Russian imperial interests also clashed in Persia, in
Afghanistan and in northern China. There were also conflicting
imperialistic goals between England and France in Africa .

War erupted in 1877 when the Bulgars rose up against their Turkish
rulers and Russia intervened on their side. The Russians defeated the
Turks, and would have driven them almost entirely out of Europe had the
other great powers not intervened. England threatened war against
Russia, and Bismarck, concerned that Austria and Germany might be drawn
in, convened a peace conference. In 1878, at the Congress of Berlin,
the Russians were coerced into relinquishing their gains in the recent
war with Turkey. Bulgaria's independence was recognized and the Austrian
government made a claim for Bosnia.

Bernard Gillam was born in England in 1859. A contemporary of Nast's who
drew for the rival Puck magazine. During the 1884 presidential
campaign, he did a parody of a famous painting by Gerôme, with Blaine
being exposed before Chicago pols with his body tattooed with all his
various scandals. This cartoon is believed to have played a significant
role in the victory of Grover Cleveland in that election. Blaine
threatened to sue but was persuaded by his political friends to back
down. Ironically, Gillam was a Republican who voted for Blaine in 1884.

The United States had treaty rights to establish a naval base on the
island of Samoa, Presient Cleveland reacted strongly when Germany tried
to install a puppet monarch. President dispatched three warships to
Samoan waters, a bellicose action that led to a determination by
Bismarck that something be done to head off the threat of a
confrontation between Germany and the United States. The Germans
suspended hostilities against Mataafa, and a new conference on Samoa was
called to meet at Berlin in late April. Cleveland and Bayard accepted
Bismarck's proposal for a tripartite conference which resulted in a
tripartite protectorate over the islands signed by Germany, Britain, and
the United States.

Gunboat Diplomacy, By Raven Hill, 'Punch', September 2, 1911
Britain and France projected strength in their entent cordiale. The Kaiser backed down, and the French
occupied Marocco. In exchange, France relinquished a chunk of the congo to Germany.

Dropping the Pilot, Sir John Tenniel, Punch, March
1890. German Emperor Wilhelm II looks anxiously at the departing of
his Chancellor Otto von Bismarck. The reference to Bismarck as a "pilot"
was from an earlier cartoon "The Champion Pilot of the age" from the
Puck magazine in which, the cartoonist Joseph Keppler depicted Bismarck
on a ship, having brought it out to the high seas. In the background,
the cartoonist depicted the French ship of state in distress. This
symbolized Bismarck's accomplishment of forming the German Kaiserreich
by means of the Franco-Prussian War.

Sultan Abdul Aziz succeeded his brother Abdul Mejid in 1861 and ruled
until 1876. The urging of France, Britain, and Austria enabled the
progressive ministers Mehmet ‘Ali Pasha and Mehmed Fuad Pasha to
reorganize the High Council to improve justice and education. In 1868
Midhat Pasha, was appointed president of a Council of State that
included Christians to prepare a budget and promote reforms. Husain Awni
Pasha worked on education in order to improve the army. Nonetheless
Abdul Aziz was reactionary and autocratic.
Whereas the Tanzimat had aimed at justice, now the young Turks wanted
liberty and constitutional government. The first political party in
Turkish history called the Patriotic Alliance or Young Ottoman Society
was formed in 1865 as a secret society based on the Carbonari in Italy.
In Namik Kemal who came from a family of Ottoman officials, began
working for the Institute of Translation and translated and published an
open letter to the Sultan by the Egyptian prince Mustafa Fazil
demanding a constitution. Exiled to the provinces, Namik Kemal went to
London and then to Paris with some other young radicals. In 1867 Abdul
Aziz was the first sultan to visit Paris and London, where he came
across these radicals. In June 1868 Kemal and Ziya Pasha began
publishing their Turkish newspaper Hurriyet, which means freedom.

Namik Kemal translated French works into Turkish, and he wrote a series
of “Letters on Constitutional Regime” to expound his liberal philosophy.
He believed in the political sovereignty of the people and that the
rights of individuals should be based on justice. He argued that Islam
is compatible with republican government, and he proposed a council of
state to draft bills and administer the laws, a national assembly to
legislate and control the budget, and a senate to moderate the
legislative body and the executive power by protecting the liberties of
the people. Kemal argued that the superiority of modern civilization
could no longer be doubted, and he urged Muslims to have faith in
liberty and progress. He was the first Turkish writer to point out how
the West had penetrated their economy, and he criticized the current
financial, administrative, and educational conditions. Although he
wanted to apply Western science, technology, economy, press, and
education, he criticized the Tanzimat legal reforms for undermining the
Muslim community. He argued that adopting the separation of state from
religion was a serious error that opened the way for European
interference. He became a patriotic romantic and urged an Islamic
constitution. His patriotic drama Vatan (Fatherland) portrayed the
heroic defense of Silistria and was performed at Istanbul in 1873. The
audience was so moved by the play that the first three performances were
followed by shouting and public demonstrations, causing Sultan Abdul
Aziz to close the play, ban Kemal’s newspaper, and deport him to Cyprus
for three years.

Mehmed Fuad died in 1869, and after the death of Mehmet ‘Ali in 1871
Sultan Abdul Aziz felt he was free from the reformers and could pursue
his absolutist tendencies. He made his ministers directly responsible to
him instead of to the grand vizier. He emulated the European luxuries
he had observed and spent money building ironclad warships and
railroads. In twenty years the Ottoman debt had risen from £4,000,000 to
£200,000,000. More than half of the empire’s revenues were now going to
pay its charges. In 1873 drought in Anatolia led to famine, and many
taxes could no longer be collected. Tax farming, which had been declared
abolished in the reforms of 1839 and 1856, was once again banned. A bad
harvest and extortions for taxes erupted into insurrection in
Herzegovina in June 1875 and spread to Bosnia, causing civil war between
Muslims and Christians.Abdülaziz was deposed by his ministers on May
30, 1876, his death a few days later was attributed to suicide.

The elite members of the
Imperial Club show little enthusiasm for their new member. The
cartoonist pokes fun at the Japanese's inappropriate mix of old and new
attire: full western frock coat combined with traditional wooden geta on
his feet, umbrella held awkwardly under the arm; buck-toothed grin and
slitted eyes are easily identifiable racist stereotypes.

One aspect that particularly rankled the Japanese was the blatant way
Russia and her henchmen in the Intervention played the race card. It may
not have been coincidental that right at this time, a great deal of
literature about the "Yellow Peril" found its way into print.The Germans
were among the most active and inventive purveyors of the Yellow Peril
myth; the term "Yellow Peril" was coined by Kaiser Wilhelm himself. The
Kaiser's feelings on race are on record and consistent; he also bandied
about the terms "Black Peril" (black Africans) and "Slav Peril" to
undergird the theory that the Reich was encircled by enemies, justifying
ever-greater military expenditures.

It is said that politics makes strange bedfellows, and in the wake of
Russia's duplicity in the Tripartite Intervention, Great Britain reached
out to Japan. Japan's capital ships had been built in Britain and many
of her leading naval commanders studied in British naval academies and
served with the British fleet. So it was that in 1902 Britain signed her
first ever foreign alliance: the Anglo-Japanese Pact of 1902. This was
certainly aimed at Russia, Britain's rival in the "Great Game"

Emperor of Japan and his British and American well-wishers according to a Russian cartoon.

At the beginning of the Russo-Japanese War, no one outside Japan had
envisaged a Russian defeat. Indeed, the very existence of the Tennō’s
empire appeared endangered. The Japanese victory, however, was
immediately recognized as a turning point in world history. For the
first time in modern history an Asian nation had defeated a European
great power. Japan immediately became an important actor in world
politics. The impact of the war took on a regional and global character,
opening the way to a new constellation of powers and becoming a prelude
to World War I.

Although a younger son of Moḥammad Shāh, Nāṣer al-Dīn was named heir
apparent through the influence of his mother. Serious disturbances broke
out when he succeeded to the throne on his father’s death in 1848, but
these were quelled through the efforts of his chief minister, Mīrzā Taqī
Khān, Amir Kabir (Great Leader). Under Taqī Khān’s influence, Nāṣer
al-Dīn began his
rule by instituting a series of needed reforms. Taqī Khān, however, was
later forced from power by his enemies, who included Nāṣer al-Dīn’s
mother, and was disgraced, imprisoned, and finally murdered. In 1852 an
attempt was made on Nāṣer al-Dīn’s life by two Bābīs (members of a
religious sect considered heretical). Unable to regain territory lost to
Russia in the early 19th century, Nāṣer al-Dīn sought compensation by
seizing Herāt, Afg., in 1856. Great Britain regarded the move as a
threat to British India and declared war on Iran, forcing the return of
Herāt as well as Iranian recognition of the kingdom of Afghanistan.

Queen Victoria receiving the Shah of Persia at the Sovereign's
Entrance, Windsor Castle, June 20. Published in an extra supplement to
the Illustrated London News, 28 June 1873.

Nasir al-Din Shah traveled to Russia in 1878 and was impressed by their
Cossacks. The next year Russian officers began training the new Persian
Cossack Brigade. Amin al-Sultan his chief minister was a skilled
politician and pursued a pro-British policy until 1892. In 1889 Nasir
al-Din Shah went to Europe for the third time. He approved a lottery
promoted by Malkum Khan; but he found opposition at home because
gambling is forbidden by the Qur’an. The Shah cancelled the lottery, and
Malkum Khan was able to sell his concession before the British were
informed. Malkum was dismissed from his positions and lost his titles.
He began criticizing the Iranian government in the reformist newspaper
Qanun (Reform Law), which he founded in London and smuggled into Iran.
The slogan “Unity, Justice, and Progress” was printed at the top, but he
made personal attacks on Amin al-Sultan. Malkum quoted the merchant
Qazvin who asked, “By what laws does the government sell our national
rights to foreign racketeers?” The answer Malkum gave is that the Shah
should call together a national assembly “to formulate laws that would
initiate social progress.”

Zichy Mihaly Horse-Guardsmen Meeting Nasir-al-Din Shah

Sayyid Jamal al-Din al-Afghani, a Muslim reformer who helped to
reconcile secularist reforms with the ‘ulama (learned Muslims), from an
Azeri-speaking village in Afghanistan, traveled to India during the
Mutiny of 1857-58, developing a hatred of British imperialism. He wrote
“Refutation of the Materialists” and gained a reputation for supporting
Islam, though he emphasized its social aspects. Jamal al-Din criticized
the intolerance of religion that stifles science and serves political
despotism, but he praised philosophy that frees one from beliefs. During
the 1870s he educated young men in Egypt. Then in Paris he edited the
Arabic newspaper al-‘Urwa al-Wuthqa, which promoted pan-Islamism. He
went to London to try to influence British policy in Egypt, but he
failed and returned to Persia. The Minister of the Press persuaded the
Shah to invite Jamal al-Din to Tehran; but his anti-British ideas
offended the Shah, who forced him to leave in 1887.

Qajar King Nasseredin Shah
kisses Queen Victoria's Hand in Curtsy upon arrival at Buckingham Palace
Reception in honor of the Persian Shah's State first Visit. Nasseredin
Shah and Queen Victoria long reign strongly shaped their respective
countries history. Victoria oversaw Britains Industrial Revolution ( not
without it's share of Dickensian transformations) where as Nasseredin
Shah opened Persia to Western economic and cultural Influence, and ideas
that were to actually undermine his absolute reign in subsequent years
following his assassination in 1848 with the 1906 Constitutional
Revolution.

At six o'clock on the evening of 31 May 1873, Shah Nasir al-Din of
Persia, fourth king of the Qajar dynasty, and his entourage arrived at
Potsdam Station in Berlin, where they were greeted by the German Emperor
Wilhelm I, Crown Prince Friedrich, Chancellor Bismarck and Field
Marshal Moltke. Welcomed by the cheering of thousands, the shah entered
Berlin along Unter den Linden, sitting in an open carriage next to the
kaiser. The Persian monarch returned to the German capital to be
received by the Hohenzollern monarchs in the summers of 1878 and 1889.
He was the first Persian head of state ever to have visited Europe. Some
years later his son and successor, Muzaffar al-Din, was also received
in Berlin. He entered the capital in June 1902 and passed through
Germany in 1900 and 1905, although he was not formally received on these
two occasions. The shahs' sojourns in Germany were part of their six
European tours, which also brought them to various other European
courts. Nasir al-Din dined with the tsars at the Winter Palace of St
Petersburg, enjoyed receptions given by King Leopold II in Brussels and
banquets with the Austrian Emperor Franz Joseph at Schönbrunn Palace,
and attended the World's Fairs in Vienna (1873) and Paris (1878 and
1889).

Nassar Al-Din,
Shah, was given admittance to the Order of the Garter by Queen Victoria,
he committed Iran to help England against Russian design for India, By
Tenniel, 'Punch', July 5, 1873.

Doctors advised the Shah to travel, and the British government loaned
the Shah £300,000 so that he could visit London for medical treatment.
Amin al-Sultan arranged loans of £3,000,000 at five percent interest
from Russia in 1900 and 1902 to repay previous loans. These proved to be
financially disastrous. Persia’s annual revenue was about £1,500,000,
but in three years they borrowed and spent almost that much. In 1888
Persia gave the Caspian fisheries to Russia. That year Henry Drummond
Wolff arrived from London,and he managed to gain economic concessions

Nāṣer-al-Din Shah granted an unprecedented concession in 1872 to Baron
Julius de Reuter, a British subject of German origin. The concession,
which covered the entire territory of Persia, gave Reuter the exclusive
rights and monopoly, for seventy years, to exploit all mineral resources
including, but not limited to, coal, iron, copper, lead, and petroleum,
and to construct and operate roads, railways, telegraph lines, water
canals, irrigation systems, and customs services. Reuter’s concession
was cancelled a few years later because of strong political pressure and
opposition from the Czarist government, as well as a number of eminent
Persians. Reuter never accepted the cancellation of his concession and
repeatedly filed claims for compensation. Eventually, as a result of the
intervention by the British minister in Tehran, Nāṣer-al-Din Shah
granted a new concession to Reuter in 1889, which became known as the
Bānk-e Šāhi (Imperial Bank of Persia) concession. Under this new
concession the bank had the right to exploit all mineral resources
throughout the country, except gold, silver, and other precious metals.

'Feline Rapprochement', By Tenniel, 'Punch', June 23, 1873
The British lion, the Persion cat and the Russian bear representing "The Great Game"

The Shah opened the Karun River to international navigation. The
Russians complained they were supposed to approve any transport
concessions, but the Iranian government claimed it was not a
concession. Wolff won a settlement of Baron Julius de Reuter’s claims
that allowed Reuter’s bank the exclusive right to issue banknotes, and
extensive mineral rights were included.
This was called the Imperial Bank of Persia and had its headquarters in
Tehran with several branches in various cities. The Russian Bank
competed by making loans to prominent people, and they received road
concessions.

Illustration
shows a man labeled "Persia" and a man labeled "Greece" drinking a toast
from a punch bowl labeled "Renewal of Diplomatic Relations". Caption: A
long time between drinks. 491 BC-1902 AD

A 1910 issue of
the German magazine Simplicissimus cover page titled 'The Persian Lion',
showing a tamed, humiliated and impotent Persia being controlled by
Britain and Russia.

In March 1890 the Shah gave the
British subject Major Talbot a fifty-year monopoly over Iran’s tobacco
production and sales in exchange for a gift of £25,000, annual rent of
£15,000, and 25% of the profits for Iran, but later in the year the
newspaper Akhtar exposed the secret and criticized the concession. Jamal
al-Din’s disciples added their leaflets on this issue that affected
many Iranians who were involved in the tobacco business. The incident—popularly termed the “Tobacco Rebellion”—is often considered to be the origin of modern Iranian nationalism. When the tobacco company’s agents began to arrive in April 1891, a major protest was led by a religious leader
from Shiraz. He was banished to Iraq and conferred with Jamal al-Din,
who wrote to the top Shi’i ‘ulama, Hajji Mirza HasanShirazi. He put an
interdict on smoking that was widely obeyed. A revolt in Tabriz forced
the Government to suspend the tobacco operation, and the general strike
spread to Mashhad, Isfahan, Tehran, Qazvin, Yazd, and Kirmanshah. The
consumer’s boycott was supported by
the Russians as well as Persians. By the end of 1891 a successful
nationwide boycott on the sale and use of tobacco was in place. In
Tehran troops fired on unarmed demonstrators,killing several, and the
Government cancelled the concession in early 1892. The Iranian
government contracted its first large foreign debt of £500,000 to the
British-owned Imperial Bank, which authorized exorbitant pay to the
company. As a result of this British fiasco the Russians became more
influential.

Alexander II and Nasir al-Din Shah on a Parade in the Tsaritsyn Meadow.

Finances were re-organized; tariffs on native merchants were increased;
and reduced court expenditures affected the ‘ulama. Belgian
administrators were invited to reform the customs, but Iranian merchants
complained that Russians were favored. The Shah sold an oil monopoly to
the Australian British subject William Knox-D’Arcy, and new road tolls
were granted to the Imperial Bank of Britain. A French company loaned
Persia £200,000 to buy arms. The Belgian Joseph Naus mediated a new
customs tariff that was signed by Persia and Russia in the Treaty of
Erzerum in November 1901, ratified in December 1902, and kept secret
until February 1903.
People protested against the Belgian administrators and the foreign
concessions. In the summer of 1903. Secret societies grew and spread
critical literature.

Reception of Nasr-ed-Din King of Persia during His Visit to St. Petersburg on 11-14 May 1

The Azerbaijani Fath ‘Ali Akhundov wrote Kamal al-Daula va Jalal
al-Daula, a collection of letters criticizing conditions in Iran. In
Tabriz intellectuals were led by bookstore owner Muhammad ‘Ali Khan and
Sayyid Hasan Taqizada. The Society of Learning was organized in Tehran,
and they founded the first national library. Five of the most important
organizations were the Secret Center in Tabriz with its journal led by
the merchant ‘Ali Karbala-yi, the Social Democratic Party of Iran formed
in 1904 in Baku by émigrés led by Azerbaijani school-teacher Narim
Narimanov, the Society of Humanity in Tehran founded by ‘Abbas Kuli Khan
Qazvini, the Revolutionary Committee headed by Malik al-Mutakallimin,
and the Secret Society founded by Nazem al-Islam Kirmani who wrote
History of the Awakening of Iranians. In February 1905 the Secret
Society listed several demands for reforms including better laws and
courts of justice.

Nasir al-Din Shah was assassinated in 1852. His oldest was excluded from
the succession because his mother was of low birth, and the sickly
Muzaffar al-Din became shah. He made no more foreign loans, and kept
order, but he was not interested in political reform. He promoted music,
art, and poetry, and he encouraged the translation of Western
literature. The police force in Tehran was modernized, and city services
were improved. The postal service expanded and began using stamps. The
three progressive writers in Trabzon were extradited and executed at
Tabriz. Jamal al-Din al-Afghani, the only person implicated by Rida
Kirmani, became very ill with cancer and died in 1897.

In December 1905 the Governor of Tehran bastinadoed some sugar merchants
for refusing to lower their raised sugar prices. They took sanctuary in
the Royal Mosque of Tehran and were joined by mullahs and tradesmen.
Imam Jum‘a helped the agents of ‘Ain al-Daula to disperse them. At
Sayyid Muhammad Tabataba’i’s suggestion they moved to the Shahzada ‘Abd
al-‘Azim shrine, where they were joined by 2,000 students, lower
mullahs, merchants, and common people. They held out for 25 days,
demanding a House of Justice (adalatkhana). The Shah dismissed the
Governor and agreed to the demand in January 1906.
When the government ordered Shaikh Muhammad Va‘iz expelled too, people
protested, and on July 11 an officer killed a young sayyid. At his
public funeral outside the mosque the Cossacks attacked the crowd,
killing 22 and wounding more than a hundred. Many mullahs and others
left Tehran and went to Qum, and the crowd protesting inside the British
legation grew to 14,000 people organized by guilds. They turned the
legation into an open-air school and heard lectures. They demanded that
‘Ain al-Daula be dismissed, and they asked for a representative assembly
(majlis) also.

On August 5, 1906, Muzaffar al-Din Shah, faced with a general strike in
Tehran, agreed to the Assembly (Majlis), which was elected by male
voters from the six classes of Mujahids, Qajars, nobles, landowners,
merchants, and guilds. Only males literate in Persian between the ages
of 30 and 70 who were not in the Government and had not been convicted
of a crime were eligible to serve in the Assembly. The first Assembly
began meeting in October 1906, and a committee wrote the Fundamental Law
that the Shah signed on December 30, five days before he died. He was
succeeded by his son Muhammad ‘Ali. He recalled Amin al-Sultan (Atabak)
from his travels, and he tried to find a compromise between the Shah and
the conservatives in the Assembly. A radical assassinated Atabak on
August 31, 1907, the same day that the British and Russians settled
their issues in Iran as well as in Tibet and Afghanistan. The treaty was
signed before the Iranians were even informed, causing riots in Shiraz,
Isfahan, and Tabriz.

The Anglo - Russian Entente
and the Division of Iran 1907, By Sambourne, 'Punch', October 2, 1907

Great Britain's interest in Persia began early in the nineteenth
century. This interest led to friction with Russia, Persia's northern
neighbour. The Anglo-Russian Agreement of 1907 helped to stabilize
nearly a century of intermittent conflict between them. This agreement
provided for a Russian sphere of influence in northern Persia while a
neutral zone separated it from Britain's sphere of influence in
south-eastern Persia. For Russia, Persia represented an area for future
territorial annexation. Great Britain, on the other hand, sought no
territory in Persia. Rather, its primary concern was not its commercial
interests, or oil fields (which were discovered two years later), but
the military security of India, its jewel in the East.

THE SALT-WATER CURE,
August 12, 1908.
The Ottoman Emperor makes another specious effort to amend his constitution..

Shah of Persia. "Go on in, Abdul—just for the look of the thing. You can always come out if you don't like it."

Sick Man of Europe. "Yes, I know. But one gets so wet!"

Mozaffar o-Din's son Mohammad Ali Shah (reigned 1907-09), with the aid
of Russia, attempted to rescind the constitution and abolish
parliamentary government. After several disputes with the members of the
Majlis, in June 1908 he used his Russian-officered Persian Cossacks
Brigade to bomb the Majlis building, arrest many of the deputies, and
close down the assembly. Resistance to the shah, however, coalesced in
Tabriz, Esfahan, Rasht, and elsewhere. In July 1909, constitutional
forces marched from Rasht and Esfahan to Tehran, deposed the shah, and
re-established the constitution.The ex-shah went into exile in Russia.

Benjamin Disraeli first met Bismarck at the Russian ambassador’s
residence in London in the summer of 1862, as leader of the Tory
opposition. On this occasion, Bismarck, on the verge of assuming power,
spelled out his plans for Prussian greatness under his leadership:

I shall soon be compelled to undertake the conduct of the Prussian
government. My first care will be to reorganize the army, with or
without the help of the Landtag [the legislature] . . . As soon as the
army shall have been brought into such a condition to inspire respect, I
shall seize the first best pretext to declare war against Austria,
dissolve the German Diet, subdue the minor states, and give national
unity to Germany under Prussian leadership. I have come here to say this
to the Queen’s ministers.

For clarity of intent, this is hard to beat. Afterwards Disraeli warned
the Austrian envoy: “Take care of that man. He means what he says.”

Punch, New crowns for old ones!, 1876

Benjamin Disraeli offers Queen Victoria the crown of Empress of India in
exchange for the British crown, and in the process reduces the power of
the British monarch.

The Royal Parrot, The Odd Fellow, 1841
In October, 1839, Queen Victoria's cousins Ernest and Albert paid her a
visit, bringing with them a letter from their uncle Leopold, in which he
recommended them to her care. They were at once upon intimate terms,
and the Queen confided to her uncle that "Albert was very fascinating."
Four days after their arrival she informed Lord Melbourne that she had
made up her mind as to the question of marriage.
The Queen described her betrothal as follows:

"At half-past twelve I sent for Albert. He came to the closet, where I
was alone, and after a few minutes I said to him that I thought he would
be aware why I wished him to come, and that it would make me happy if
he would consent to what I wished, namely, to marry me. There was no
hesitation on his part, but the offer was received with the greatest
demonstrations of kindness and affection. . . . I told him I was quite
unworthy of him. . . . He said he would be very happy to spend his life
with me."

Leopold II, King of Belgium, holding bags of money! 'With France
and Prussia pressing on each side', By Coide, Vanity Fair, 1869.

The most notable event in Leopold's career was the foundation of the
Congo Free State. While still Duke of Brabant he had been the first to
call the attention of the Belgians to the need of enlarging their
horizon beyond sea, and after his accession to the throne he gave the
first impulse towards the development of this idea by founding in 1876
the Association Internationale Africaine. He enlisted the services of
Henry Morton Stanley, who visited Brussels in 1878 after exploring the
Congo river, and returned in 1879 to the Congo as agent of the Comité
d'Études du Haut Congo, soon afterwards reorganized as the
"International Association of the Congo." This association was, in
1884-85, recognized by the powers as a sovereign state under the name of
the État Indépendant du Congo.

Leopold's exploitation of this vast territory, which he administered
autocratically, and in which he associated himself personally with
various financial schemes, was understood to bring him an enormous
fortune; it was the subject of acutely hostile criticism, to a large
extent substantiated by the report of a commission of inquiry instituted
by the king himself in 1904, and followed in 1908 by the annexation of
the state to Belgium.

Some of the most recognizable cartoons were published in Harper's
Weekly, a New York City periodical that also featured sketches of war
scenes and famous personalities - as well as news and serialized
literature. Among its illustrators were Winslow Homer (who also worked
for the Illustrated Times) and Alfred Waud. The leading illustrator of
Harpers Weekly was Thomas Nast. Nast was the most influential American
caricaturist in the mid- to late 19th century. Specializing in political
cartoons. He was a staunch opponent of slavery and throughout the Civil
War produced patriotic drawings urging people to help crush the
rebels. Abraham Lincoln is reported to have said: "Thomas Nast has been
our best recruiting sergeant. His emblematic cartoons have never failed
to arouse enthusiasm and patriotism." Nast was also the artist who
created the traditional image of Santa Claus and the Republican party's
elephant symbol.

The pedlar and his pack, or the desperate effort,
an over balance, James Akin, 1812. The editor of Philadelphia
Democratic Press, John Binns, who had published handbills accusing
candidate Andrew Jackson of arbitrary executions and other violent acts
supports a load of coffins on his back, along with the figures of Henry
Clay and incumbent President Adams.

Black Recruit and Abraham Lincoln, London Punch, 1862

We Accept the Situation, Thomas Nast for Harpers Weekly, 1867, An
emancipated black voting for the first time versus a resentful,
disenfranchised former Confederates.

On April 13, 1906 a cartoon in the New York World featured Mark Twain dethroning Czar Nicholas II with his pen.

Theodore Roosevelt's "trust-busting" campaigns

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was the first measure passed by the
U.S. Congress to prohibit abusive monopolies. At that time, Standard Oil
and its affiliates controlled more than 90 percent of the oil refining
capacity and most of the oil marketing facilities in the U.S. The
Sherman Act authorized the federal government to institute proceedings
against trusts in order to dissolve them, but Supreme Court rulings
prevented federal authorities from using the act for some years.
Theodore Roosevelt committed himself in 1901 and during both of his
mandates to a strong war against monopolies, launching the federal
government in 1906 in a lawsuit against the Standard. As a result of
President Theodore Roosevelt's "trust-busting" campaigns, the Sherman
Act began to be invoked with some success.

President Theodore Roosevelt was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1906
for his work in the negotiations that led to the Treaty of Portsmouth
ending the Russo-Japanese War in 1905.

The negotiations to end the Russo-Japanese war began at Sagamore Hill
when Roosevelt invited diplomats on both sides, Russia and Japan, to
his home in Oyster Bay. After meeting with all of them, he sent the
diplomats out on board of the presidential yacht Mayflower.
Negotiations continued at and near a naval base in Portsmouth, because
it was federal property and cool in the summer. Delegates also went back
and forth to Oyster Bay to confer with the president. The peace treaty
was signed at the US Navy base in Portsmouth. Thus the accord is called
the "Treaty of Portsmouth".

Theodore Roosevelt and Anti-Third Term Principle,
This cartoon satirize Roosevelt's reversal of his anti-third term
promise and his assumption of leadership of the Progressive Party. Both
La Follette and Roosevelt lost the Republican nomination to the
incumbent, Taft, who still controlled the national convention delegates.
Roosevelt, however, had swept 9 of the 12 states with primaries,
including Taft's home state of Ohio. 1912

The US President Taft Handing the Problematical Mexican Situation to His Successor Woodrow Wilson,
Louis Glackens. 1913

The Treaty of Versailles was signed at the Paris Peace Conference of
1919. The main signatories of the treaty were the Big Four: the British
Prime Minister, Lloyd George, the US President Woodrow Wilson, the
French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau and the Italian Prime Minister
Vittorio Orlando.
"Peace and future cannon fodder", a small child with a copy of the
Treaty behind him and his head the sign "1940 class". The Big Four are
seen walking past, and there is a caption: "The Tiger: Curious! I seem
to hear a child weeping!".The final treaty was not popular. Many in
Britain and France were angry that Germany hadn't been treated more
harshly and that the German Kaiser hadn't been put on trial. Most
Germans were humiliated and horrified by the treaty - disgusted at being
made to take the blame for the entire war (the War Guilt clause - 231)
and having to pay for it.

Germany's view of
the Versailles Peace Proposals, is captured in this cartoon in
Simpliccimus issue of June 3, 1919. The American president Wilson, the
French president Clemenceau and the British Prime Minister Lloyd George
have condemned the country to death.

The Gaol bird is the broken-wing "peace" who is chained to the Treaty
of Versailles. Clemenceau, Lloyd George and Wilson announce that she is
free!
The American politics were deeply divided with President Wilson at the
helms of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party dominating the
US Congress. Republicans used the Treaty as an opportunity to criticize
Wilson for not consulting them about the Treaty. Americans were also
queasy about president's vision for a League of Nations. Some Americans
felt that the Treaty was lopsided against Germany and Britain and France
were imposing harsh financial penalties on Germany to enrich
themselves. In the end, the Congress rejected the Treaty of Versailles
and the League of Nations.

Dutch artist Louis Raemaekers (1869–1956) has been called the Great
Cartoonist of the Great War. According to president Theodore Roosevelt;
The cartoons of Louis Raemaekers constitute the most powerful of the
honorable contributions made by neutrals to the cause of civilization in
the World War. Born in Roermond, in the Netherlands, Raemaekers,
unconvinced by reports of German atrocities in invaded Belgium, crossed
the border and returned home outraged. In the early years of WWI,
Raemaekers, critical of the United States’ neutrality, in a number of
drawings clearly asked for U.S. intervention. His scathing anti-German
political cartoons gained rapid fame at home and abroad. By October 1917
more than two thousand newspapers on both sides of the Atlantic were
printing his drawings on a regular basis . Raemaekers’s often
provocative work resulted in his government’s threatening to place him
on trial for jeopardizing Dutch neutrality. After the armistice,
Raemaekers used his art to champion the League of Nations and, later, to
sound the alarm against German and Italian fascism.

Will they last, Louis Raemaekers, c. 1915, Germany’s Kaiser
Wilhelm II, the subject of Raemaekers’s many barbed caricatures, put a
bounty on his head.

Political cartoon by Frederick Opper from Puck magazine showing Queen
Victoria and her family panhandling from John Bull on the steps of
Buckingham Palace.

THE STORY OF FIDGETY WILHELM

(Up-to-date Version of "Struwwelpeter")
"Let me see if Wilhelm can
Be a little gentleman;
Let me see if he is able
To sit still for once at table!"
"But Fidgety Will
He won't sit still."
Just like any bucking horse.
"Wilhelm! We are getting cross!"
Feb. 1, 1896

On March 31, 1905, Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany arrived in Tangiers to
declare his support for the sultan of Morocco, provoking the anger of
France and Britain in what will become known as the First Moroccan
Crisis, a foreshadowing of the greater conflict between Europe's great
nations still to come, the First World War.

A Second Moroccan Crisis flared in April 1911, when the French pushed
troops into the country, claiming to be defending the sultan against
riots that had erupted in Fez but actually violating the terms of the
Algeciras convention. In response, Germany sent its own warship, the
Panther, which arrived in the port of Agadir on May 21, intensifying the
enmity between the two nations and, by extension, their allies.
Slightly more than two years before the outbreak of World War I, then,
the two Moroccan crises left no doubt that the traditional power balance
in Europe had shifted into large blocs of power, with Germany
relatively isolated on one side—enjoying only lukewarm support from
Austria-Hungary and Italy—and Britain, France, and Russia on the other.

The Entente Cordiale, an agreement between Britain and France, resolved a
number of longstanding colonial disputes, and established a diplomatic
understanding between the two countries, which however stopped short of
binding either to any military undertaking in support of the other.
France, keen to build a buffer against possible German aggression,
signed the agreement in a bid to encourage an Anglo alliance with
France. Similarly Britain was willing to encourage co-operation between
the two countries with an eye on Germany's decision to expand her naval
strength in competition with Britain.

Germany, concerned over the signing of the entente agreement, determined
to test its practical strength by provoking a crisis in Morocco in
1905, leading to the Algeciras Conference (1906).
The entente was extended in 1907 to include Russia, culminating in the
alliance that formally took on the Central Powers during World War One.

UNCONQUERABLE, 1914

THE KAISER: "So, you see--you've lost everything."

THE KING OF THE BELGIANS: "Not my soul."

On 2 August 1914, the day before Germany declared war on France, the
German government wrote to the Belgian government demanding the right of
free passage across Belgium for its troops, so that the latter could
most efficiently invade France and reach Paris.
Belgium's reply to what amounted to a German ultimatum (grant free
passage or suffer occupation as an enemy of Germany) was delivered on 3
August 1914.

Germany's invasion of Belgium on 4 August 1914 quickly prompted
allegations of 'war crimes'. Some of them were confined to excesses
committed in the military conflict. But the accusations of atrocities
committed against civilians in occupied Belgium were far more damaging
to the German cause. During the autumn of 1914, the British Foreign
Office received a number of disturbing 'eyewitness' accounts from
fleeing British subjects and Belgian refugees.

THE EXCURSIONIST, November 1914

TRIPPER WILHELM: "First Class to Paris."

CLERK: "Line blocked."

WILHELM: "Then make it Warsaw."

CLERK: "Line blocked."

WILHELM: "Well, what about Calais?"

CLERK: "Line blocked."

WILHELM: "Hang it! I must go somewhere! I promised my people I would."

THE FLIGHT THAT FAILED. January 1915

THE EMPEROR: "What! No babes, Sirrah?"

THE MURDERER: "Alas, Sire, none."

THE EMPEROR: "Well, then, no babes, no iron crosses."

(Exit murderer, discouraged.)

Throughout 1914 the Zeppelin air ships were used for reconnaissance
patrols over the North Sea, but the German Admiralty was pressing for
permission to use them for attacks against England. The Kaiser,
somewhat reluctantly, granted such permission and on the 19th of January
the Germans carried out the first Zeppelin raid against Britain,
killing two and injuring sixteen.
This was the first of many raids, which continued at a rate of about two
per month, in parallel with the continuing reconnaissance patrols. The
German Admiralty was very enthusiastic about the results, and asked for
permission to bomb London. This was only granted by the Kaiser after a
series of raids by French bombers on German cities. On the 31st of May
1915 the first raid was carried out against London, killing seven and
injuring thirty five.

THE OLD MAN OF THE SEA
SINBAD THE KAISER:
"This submarine business is going to get me into trouble with America;
but what can an All-Powerful do with a thing like this on his back?"

At 1:40 p.m. on May 7, 1915, the German U-boat, U-20 launched a torpedo
at the British ocean liner RMS Lusitania, famous for its luxurious
accommodations and speed capability. The sinking of Lusitania enraged
Americans and hastened the United States' entrance into World War I.

REALISATION ("When I went to Bulgaria I resolved that if there
were to be any assassinations I would be on the side of the assassins."
STATEMENT BY FERDINAND.)

The Kaiser, Ferdinand and Hamid II stand over the
corpse of Armenia. On 19 May 1915, Britain, Frence, and Russia condemned
Turkey's massacre of Armenians. Bulgarian Tsar Ferdinand decided on 23
September 1915 to join the Central Powers, and on 14 October 1915
declared war on Serbia. In retaliation Britain and France declared war
on Bulgaria on 16 October. Russia followed suit a few days later.

In the summer of 1915 Austria approached Serbia with proposals for a separate peace, Kaiser was dismayed.

THE RETURN OF THE MOCK TURTLE-DOVE, December 1916

KAISER

}

}

(breathlessly): "Well?"

BETHMANN-HOLLWEG

}

THE BIRD: "Wouldn't even look at me!"

THE DAWN OF DOUBT
GRETCHEN: "I wonder if this gentleman really is my good angel after all!"

Gretchen's character in Faust represents the ability of humanity to
become corrupted because of a turn towards the subjective self. Gretchen
originally represents goodness and morality; even Mephistopheles finds
no fault in her. However, Faust's influence on her inward life causes
her to lose this morality by focusing on a selfish love affair that
costs her life and faith.

RUPPRECHT (of Bavaria): "Well, as one Crown Prince to another, what about your Hohenzollern line?"

After the German declaration of War on France on August 3, the Crown
Prince Wilhelm of Prussia joined his regiment, which saw action at the
Battle of Longwy. For his service the Crown Prince was awarded the Iron
Cross. Soon the winds of war changed, German troops had been close to
Paris, but came to a halt at the Marne. The bitter fighting and the
heavy losses of men and material made the Crown Prince write a
memorandum in which he stated that he favored an end to the senseless
hostilities. Russia was very much on his mind. In 1917 the Crown Prince
tried to persuade Chancellor Hollweg to sue for a reasonable peace. This
time a firm refusal came from the High Command of the Army (Hindenburg
and Ludendorff) In another letter dated July 18, 1917 he tried again to
influence Reich politics. He brought forward several suggestions for the
possible achievement of Peace. Again, he was rebuffed.

He was not involved in the reform efforts in the fall of 1918; he was at
the time with his regiment. The peace negotiations were of the utmost
importance for the future of the House of Hohenzollern, as the opposing
nations demanded the abdication of the Kaiser. However, the Kaiser
refused to give up. At the beginning of November 1918, in view of the
hopeless situation on the fronts and the intolerable situation at home, a
group of sailors of the Imperial Navy refused to take their ships out
for a last senseless slaughter, and soon this revolution spread all
through Germany, reaching Berlin on November 9. The Kaiser was at his
headquarters and still refused to budge. Chancellor Max von Baden took
it upon himself to announce that the Kaiser of Germany and King of
Prussia, Wilhelm II, had decided to denounce the throne. His hand forced
in this way, the Kaiser was persuaded to seek asylum in neutral
Holland. He avoided capture but made it impossible to retain the
monarchy in Germany. Both the Kaiser and the Crown Prince signed the
document of abdication. With this, the 500-year-old dynasty had come to
an end

A WORD OF ILL OMEN, June, 1917.

CROWN PRINCE (to Kaiser, drafting his next speech): "For Gott's sake,
father, be careful this time, and don't call the American Army
'contemptible.'"

On 3 February 1917, President Wilson addressed Congress to announce that
diplomatic relations with Germany were severed. In a Special Session of
Congress held on 2 April 1917, President Wilson delivered his 'War
Message.' Four days later, Congress overwhelmingly passed the War
Resolution which brought the United States into the Great War.

RUSSIA'S DARK HOUR, August, 1917.

Since early 1917, Russia, one of the Entente's principal powers, had
been in a state of turmoil. In February of that year, the Czarist
government's poor management of the war had helped to inspire a popular
uprising, the February Revolution. This revolution forced the abdication
of Czar Nicholas II and placed in power a Provisional Government of
liberal and socialist factions, ultimately under the leadership of
Socialist Revolutionary party member Alexander Kerensky. This brief
experiment with pluralist democracy was a chaotic one, and in the summer
months, the continual deterioration of the war effort and an
increasingly dire economic situation caused Russian workers, soldiers,
and sailors to riot ("The July Days").

On October 24-25, 1917, Bolshevik (left-wing socialist) forces under
Vladimir Lenin seized key government buildings and stormed the Winter
Palace, then the seat of the new government in Russia's capital,
Petrograd (now St. Petersburg). The "Great October Socialist
Revolution," the first successful Marxist coup in history, dislodged the
ineffectual Provisional Government, and ultimately established a Soviet
Socialist Republic under Lenin's leadership. The new Soviet state's
radical social, political, economic, and agrarian reforms would in the
postwar years unnerve Western democratic governments, who so feared the
spread of Communism throughout Europe that they were willing to
compromise or appease right-wing regimes (including Adolf Hitler's Nazi
Germany) in the 1920s and 1930s.

But the immediate effect of the Russian Revolution on the European stage
was a brutal and enduring Civil War in Russian lands (1917-1922) and
the decision of the new Bolshevik leadership to make a separate peace
with the Kaiser's Germany. When negotiations foundered over German
demands, the German army launched an all-out offensive on the Eastern
Front, resulting in a peace treaty at Brest-Litovsk on March 6, 1918.

THE INSEPARABLE, September, 1917.
THE KAISER (to his people): "Do not listen to those who would sow dissension between us. I will never desert you."

BETRAYED, December, 1917.
THE PANDER: "Come on; come and be kissed by him."

MADE IN GERMANY, March 1918

CIVILISATION: "What's that supposed to represent?"

IMPERIAL ARTIST: "Why, 'Peace,' of course."

CIVILISATION: "Well, I don't recognise it--and I never shal

THE DEATH LORD, April, 1918.
THE KAISER (on reading the appalling tale of German losses): "What matter, so we Hohenzollerns survive?"

THE SANDS RUN OUT, October, 1918.

On November 9, 1918, in the midst of widespread unrest and deserted by
the commanders of the German Army, Emperor (Kaiser) William II abdicated
the German throne. On the same day, SPD delegate Philipp Scheidemann
proclaimed Germany a republic, with an interim government led by
Friedrich Ebert. Two days later, German representatives, led by Catholic
Center Party (Zentrum) representative Matthias Erzberger, met with a
delegation of the victorious Entente powers under French Field Marshall
Ferdinand Foch, the commanding general of the Entente forces, in a
railcar in Compiègne Forest and accepted armistice terms.

Ilych Lenin ridding the world of monarchs, capitalists and clerics, Viktor Deni, 1919

The Gap in the Bridge, by Leonard Ravenhill, in the British magazine Punch 1919

This cartoon is critical of America. Although President Wilson had been
the originator the the idea of a League, now America is refusing to join
-- in spite of the USA being the 'keystone'.

Woman’s Vote, William H. Walker, 1920. In the first
presidential election in which they could vote, women were wooed by
both major parties.

A bread line or a run on a bank? Chester Garde, 1931.

Hoover, facing harsh criticism from the American public for his policy
inaction, reluctantly established the Reconstruction Finance Corporation
(RFC), in 1932, which provided loans to failing banks, and through the
additional power of the Emergency Relief Act, the RFC was authorized to
provide loans to state governments for unemployment relief. But, these
efforts were too late to stop the economic downslide of the country. He
was overwhelmingly defeated by Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt in the
1932 presidential election. For the rest of the depression, though,
Hoover attacked every substantive measure for relief and what he saw as
radical influences in Washington.

“A Scene from the ‘Good Old Days.’” from Brennessel, the Nazi
humor magazine, January 1934. Marx is portrayed as a theoretician that
leads German workers into a ruinous path.

Hoover Prosperity, Tulley, ca. 1932. A sarcastic interpretation
of Herbert Hoover’s contention that prosperity was just around the
corner.

/td>

Mephisto to Faust: You Can Trust me, Louis Raemaekers, 1939, A
sarcastic interpretation of the Non- Aggression Pact of 1939 signed in
August with a secret agenda between Stalin and Hitler.

Constitution of the United States Canceled, Greaves , 1940.
F.D.R.’s pursuit of a third term suggested that he acts like a king who
considered himself above the law.

“The Calendar of a Condemned Man.” a German propaganda cartoon
in Lustige Blätter, 1941. Churchill crosses out the names of English
cities as the gallows waits behind him.

Nazi propaganda cartoon, Brennessel, 1938. Mars is
speaking to the "warmongers" Eden and Churchill, who had been objecting
to Chamberlain's appeasement policies. This was Brennessel's last
cover cartoon featuring Churchill before closing down in that year.

“American Candelabra,” an anti-Semitic propaganda cartoon in
Lustige Blätter, 1942. Roosevelt is portrayed as the upholder of the
Jewish Interests

Punch cartoon, 1933. Adolf Hitler is carried to power on the shoulders
of President Paul von Hindenburg (Left) and Chancellor Franz von Papen
(Right). By dismissing Prussia's social-democratic state government in
July 1932, Papen struck a fatal blow against the beleaguered Weimar
Republic.

Hitler's Dream

In 1940, Marshal
Philippe Pétain was a national hero in France for his victory at the
Battle of Verdun during World War I. Following the German invasion of
France in May 1940, the well-respected eight-four-year old was asked to
form a government. Seeing the French army defeated, the “Hero of Verdun”
asked for an armistice. With the German army occupying two-thirds of
the country, Pétain believed he could repair the ruin caused by the
invasion and obtain the release of the numerous prisoners of war by
cooperating with the Germans. He, however, opposed Franco-German
collaboration advocated by his vice premier Pierre Laval, whom he
dismissed in December 1940. When the Germans forced Pétain to take Laval
back as premier, he himself withdrew into a purely nominal role. Yet he
balked at resigning, convinced that, if he did, Hitler would place all
of France directly under German rule.

After Allied landings in November 1942 in North Africa, Pétain secretly
ordered his forces to aid the Allies. But, at the same time, he
published official messages protesting the landing. His doubledealing
was to be his undoing. When Pétain dispatched an emissary to arrange for
a peaceful transfer of power, General de Gaulle refused it. Brought to
trial in France for high treason, he was stripped for all rank and
sentenced to death. The High Court requested that the sentence should
not be carried out in view of Pétain’s great age, and later de Gaulle
commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment.

The Dummy That
Spoke by Itself. Adolf/Benito } (together). "Where did that one come
from - you or me?" (the dummy, General Franco of Spain, says "Withdraw
All Volunteers!" as neither Hitler or Mussolini knows which of them is
really controlling the puppet)

Illingworth, 2
November 1939, Hitler is being advised by his advisers ‘Why not an
offensive today?... Wait until the spring .. Russian gold is behind
us... Germany is bankrupt... Why not bomb Britain?... there might be
reprisals...’

Szyk portrays the Axis plot to dominate the world. Hitler sits at the
head of the table (left), flanked by Joseph Goebels and Hermann Goering
on his left, Spanish dictator Francisco Franco to his right, and
Heinrich Himmler across.

Harry Truman playing Stalin a chess game the board is Germany, and the
opening gambit occurs in Berlin. Leslie Illington, National Library of
Wales.

Stalin’s pieces include “Eastern Bloc,” and “Berlin Blockade.” Truman's
pieces include a knight, “Air Lift,” and a piece looking a lot like
Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, “Atlantic Alliance.” Stalin's real concern was
for the emergence of an economically viable West Germany that would
fall under the shadow of American control and eliminate any potential
opportunity for Soviet influence in either the western zones or western
Berlin. He saw the world in terms of competing hegemonies, one in the
East controlled by the Soviets and one in the West by the United States.

On April 12, 1945, Harry S. Truman, the Vice President of the United
States, was elevated by the sudden death of Franklin D. Roosevelt to the
Presidency of the United States. With the war in Europe near its
triumphant end, Truman had immediately to deal with Soviet intentions to
impose Communist regimes in Eastern Europe and possibly to exploit the
economic breakdown in Western Europe. Simultaneously he had to seek
military and political solutions in the war against Japan. He was
interested when Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson explained the atomic
project to him on April 25, 1945--
"If it explodes, as I think it will, I'll certainly have a hammer on
those boys," "On July 24 I casually mentioned to Stalin that we had a
new weapon of unusual destructive force," Truman recalled. "The Russian
Premier showed no special interest. All he said was that he was glad to
hear it and hoped we would make 'good use of it against the Japanese.'"

Truman established 12 points for the maintenance of World peace in a
speech on Navy Day. The UK's Prime minister Attlee suggested to
president that the five permanent members of the World Security Council
-- Britain, America, Russia , France and China - share the atomic bomb
secrets, meaning that the Big Five would be able to use the bomb against
an aggressor nation, but no aggressor, except a member of the Council,
would be able to retaliate. Truman later explained his policy on his
State of the Union speech on January 7, 1953. Arguing that

The communist rulers are moving, with implacable will, to create greater
strength in their vast empire, and to create weakness and division in
the free world, preparing for the time their false creed teaches them
must come: the time when the whole world outside their sway will be so
torn by strife and contradictions that it will be ripe for the communist
plucking.

To overcome this threat he suggested that:

Like the pioneers who settled this great continent of ours, we have had
to carry a musket while we went about our peaceful business. We realized
that if we and our allies did not have military strength to meet the
growing Soviet military threat, we would never have the opportunity to
carry forward our efforts to build a peaceful world of law and
order--the only environment in which our free institutions could survive
and flourish.

The first major step in the cold war to develope unity, strength and resolute will of the free nations according to him

was the determined and successful effort made through the United Nations
to safeguard the integrity and independence of Iran in 1945 and 1946.

Cy Hungerford, "An Uncomfortable Situation." December 3, 1953.

This editorial cartoon comments on the political problems Senator Joseph
McCarthy presented to President Dwight D. Eisenhower. Senator Joseph R.
McCarthy was a little-known junior senator from Wisconsin until
February 1950 when he claimed to possess a list of 205 card-carrying
Communists employed in the U.S. Department of State. From that moment
Senator McCarthy became a tireless crusader against Communism in the
early 1950s, a period that has been commonly referred to as the "Red
Scare." As chairman of the Senate Permanent Investigation Subcommittee,
Senator McCarthy conducted hearings on communist subversion in America
and investigated alleged communist infiltration of the Armed Forces. His
subsequent exile from politics coincided with a conversion of his name
into a modern English noun "McCarthyism," or adjective, "McCarthy
tactics," when describing similar witch hunts in recent American
history. [The American Heritage Dictionary gives the definition of
McCarthyism as: 1. The political practice of publicizing accusations of
disloyalty or subversion with insufficient regard to evidence; and 2.
The use of methods of investigation and accusation regarded as unfair,
in order to suppress opposition.] Senator McCarthy was censured by the
U.S. Senate on December 2, 1954 and died May 2, 1957.

David Low, "Ssh! Welcome!" 23rd Oct. 1957

Macmillan wanted the
repeal of the 1946 McMahon Act which blocked the sharing of nuclear
infor-
mation between the United States and the United Kingdom. At the Bermuda
conference of March 1957, Macmillan succeeded at least in rebuilding a
public front of Anglo-American solidarity. During August 1957, fears
plagued Washington that Syria might be about to become a fully ﬂedged
Soviet satellite state. In a bid to thwart this development, Secretary
of State John Foster Dulles agreed to pool efforts with the British in a
joint Syria working group established during September 1957. The
purpose of the group
was to examine the options available to Britain and America to block the
advance
of Soviet inﬂuence in Syria through covert action.

It was with the example of the cooperation forged over Syria in mind
that Macmillan responded to the momentous news of the launch of the
Sputnik satellite on 4 October 1957.24 The launch prompted the dispatch
of a crucial personal message from Macmillan to Eisenhower on 10
October. In it, Macmil- lan linked the Syrian experiment with the
Sputnik challenge. Arguing that Sputnik had served to bring home the
need to pool efforts to meet the formi- dable Russian threat, in a s
diary entry, Macmillan wrote:

The Russian success in launching the satellite has been something
equivalent to Pearl Harbour [sic]. The American cocksureness is shaken. .
. . President is under severe attack for ﬁrst time . . . Foster is
under still more severe attack. His policies are said to have failed
everywhere. . . . The atmosphere is now such that almost anything might
be decided, however revolutionary.

Leslie Illingworth , "There's Nothing In It.", Punch, October 1951
After nationalizing the Iranian oil industry, the ring master, Prime
minister Mohammed Mosaddeq of Iran, passes the circus hoop to the
Egyptian Prime Minister Mustafa el-Nahhas, encouraging him to
nationalize Suez Canal, and forcing the British lion to jump through
the hoop.

Michael Cummings, "The problem is really one of not being taken for a ride..."
Daily Express, 11 Jul 1951,

Muhammad Mossadegh, the Iranian prime minister overthrown by US and
British agents in 1953, was a man who declined a salary, returned gifts,
and collected tax arrears from his beloved mother. Frugality was allied
to punctiliousness in this droopy-nosed aristocrat who enraged the West
by insisting that Iran, not Britain, should own, sell, and profit from
Iranian oil. A member of the princely Qajar family, he retained a
noblesse-oblige gentility even as he became the symbol of postwar
Iranian assertiveness.

Two years after Mossadegh’s nationalization of the Anglo-Iranian Oil
Company (AIOC) in 1951, the CIA unloosed Kermit Roosevelt and his fellow
American agents on Tehran to oust him. The operation, code-named
TPAJAX, carried forward to a bloody denouement what Britain’s MI6 had
first plotted. The objectives of a rising America and a declining
Britain diverged; they overlapped just sufficiently for both to do their
worst. Iran was fragile, and Mossadegh’s constitutionalism was a
nuanced idea in an environment where bazaar toughs with nicknames like
Brainless Shaban whipped up crowds.

Cummings used the following pieces of the news to represent a British perspective on Mossadegh

News: 9 Jul: Speeches by Ministers and Press comment in Teheran
suggested that the Persian Government intended to ignore the
International Court of Justice, in the Hague, recommendations on interim
measures for dealing with the oil dispute.

News: 9 Jul: Mr Morrison, the Foreign Secretary, said that the Persians
did not have the skill and experience to produce, refine and market the
oil. He said the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company had provided houses,
education, hospitals and clubs for its Persian employees.

News: 11 Jul: Mr Mason, Mr Drake's deputy, announced that Mr Cox Fields,
the general manager of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, was visiting
Goshen to arrange for the withdrawal of five British staff to Abadan.
The company had offered the Persian temporary board the field with 333
Persian workers, to operate it themselves, but they had not responded.
Oi

Leslie Illingworth,
The Merchant of Persia. If you deny me, fie upon your law! (Shylock)
So vital is the cause at stake to the nation that Persia cannot afford
the slightest risk of an unfavourable decision. (Moussadek), Punch, June 1952.

Most of Iran's oil reserves were in the Persian Gulf area and had been
developed by the British Anglo-Iranian Oil company and exported to
Britain. For a number of reasons — a growing consciousness of how little
Iran was getting from the Anglo-Iranian Oil company (AIOC) for its oil;
refusal of AIOC to offer of a ‘50–50% profit sharing deal' to Iran as
Aramco had to Saudi Arabia; anger over Iran's defeat and occupation by
the Allied powers — nationalization of oil was an important and popular
issue with "a broad cross-section of the Iranian people."[On 28 April
1951, the Majlis named Mosaddeq as new prime minister by a vote of
79–12. Aware of Mosaddeq's rising popularity and political power, the
young Shah appointed Mosaddeq to the Premiership. On 1 May, Mosaddeq
nationalized the AIOC, cancelling its oil concession due to expire in
1993 and expropriating its assets. The next month a committee of five
majlis deputies was sent to Khuzistan to enforce the nationalization.
Oil production came to a virtual standstill as British technicians left
the country, and Britain imposed a worldwide embargo on the purchase of
Iranian oil. In September 1951, Britain froze Iran's sterling assets and
banned export of goods to Iran. It challenged the legality of the oil
nationalization and took its case against Iran to the International
Court of Justice at The Hague. The court found in Iran's favor,but the
dispute between Iran and the AIOC remained unsettled. Under United
States pressure, the AIOC improved its offer to Iran.

Herbert Block, The Cuban Missile Crisis, 1963. When U-2 spy
planes sent by the CIA revealed that Soviet missile sites were under
construction in Cuba, it led to a serious threat of nuclear war and
tense negotiations between Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev.

It was the Cuban Missile Crisis in the autumn of 1962, that
formed the backdrop to Khrushchev's fall from power. President Kennedy
(embarassed by the Bay of Pigs and the Berlin Wall) was determined to
stand firmly against the deployment (and arming) of Soviet missile bases
in Cuba, a scant 90 miles from Florida. Khrushchev seemed equally
determined to do so. In the tense, indeed terrifying, standoff of
October, 1962, the Soviet fleet sailed towards Cuba, but, at the last
minute, turned around. Score a point for Kennedy! It was as close to
open, overt warfare that the United States and the Soviet Union came.
This "balance of terror" made possible some lightening of tensions. It
did, as well, have the effect of humiliating Khrushchev. In 1964, he was
ousted from power.

Conrad, Denver Post (1963),

This cartoon pertains to the Cuban Missile Crisis, in which U-2 spy
planes sent by the CIA revealed that Soviet missile sites were under
construction in Cuba, leading to tense negotiations between Kennedy and
Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev.

Next to the symbol of the Cold War – the Berlin Wall – Khrushchev says
to Kennedy: “I just closed off what belongs to me. I’m willing to
negotiate about the rest.” (Pulitzer Prize winner Edmund Valtman’s
political cartoon collection)

Paul Labowsky, Berlin, 1963

Castro used the two communist rivals in his struggle against the US
policies. Mao Zedong resented Russia's willingness to compromise with
capitalism in "peaceful coexistence, and had aggressive plans for
advancing Marxist-Leninist goals in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, and
conflict with Soviet policies in those places was inevitable.
Khrushchev badly miscalculated Cuban situation, which he feared would be
invaded by Americans. He sought to parry the American advantage by
installing short-range Soviet missiles with nuclear warheads in Cuba,
supposedly under his control (not Castro's). On Tuesday, the 23rd, 1962,
U.S. ships took up positions along a line 800 miles from Cuba. The
naval blockade was traditionally an act of war, but the U.S. public saw
it as a step in defending the country. Khrushchev and his colleagues
were opposed to a "beautiful death" and a glorious showdown with the
U.S. that Castro and Che Guevara had been advocating. He told Castro
that "We aren't struggling against imperialism in order to die." Castro
remained furious with Khrushchev, accusing him of having no cojones.
Mao joined in the criticism. He denounced Soviet leadership for giving
in to the U.S. The China-Soviet split was still on, and, in 1963, Mao
would find fault with the Russians for signing the Nuclear Test Ban
Treaty with the United States and Britain. Khrushchev responded by
declaring that Mao's policies would lead to nuclear war.

Patrice Lumumba, by Bernard Safran (1924 – 1995)

Patrice Lumumba, was the first legally elected prime minister of the
Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). He was assassinated, on 17
January, 1961. This heinous crime was a culmination of two inter-related
assassination plots by American and Belgian governments, which used
Congolese accomplices and a Belgian execution squad to carry out the
deed.

Ludo De Witte, the Belgian author of the best book on this crime,
qualifies it as "the most important assassination of the 20th century".
The assassination's historical importance lies in a multitude of
factors, the most pertinent being the global context in which it took
place, its impact on Congolese politics since then and Lumumba's overall
legacy as a nationalist leader.

Michael Cummings, Sunday Express, 21 Aug 1960

February 2002.
The Belgian parliamentary commission investigating the death of Patrice
Lumumba finds that the Belgian government carried a “moral
responsibility”. Louis Michel apologizes to the Congolese people. No
further legal action was taken.

Herblock, Washington Post, 1967.

The Vietnam War was extremely long as well as highly unpopular. America
became involved in the War in 1955 and the first troops arrived in
Vietnam in 1965. The war continued on into the 70’s, ending in 1973.
Many groups of people on the home front opposed the Vietnam War and
disagreed with American domestic and foreign policies.

Conrad, Nixon drills a hole in the wall of the Democratic headquarters and claims that he’s from the phone company. Los Angeles Times, 1972. “Watergate was a godsend to political cartoonists,” said Philadelphia Inquirer cartoonist Tony Auth.

Bill Garner, Détente, 1976

Henry Kissinger is stuck in in detente, while Leonid Brezhnev and Mao Tse-tung (Mao Zedong) are watching.

Joseph Stalin had not backed Mao against the nationalists during World
War II, and his insistence that China pay cash for weapons during the
Korean War was a source of grievance. Over time, the Soviets decided
that Mao was unreliable and that China was a potential rival. When they
withdrew their support of China's nuclear weapons program, the Chinese
proceeded on their own, exploding their first atomic bomb in 1964 and a
hydrogen bomb in 1967. Nixon and Kissinger sought to improve relations
between the United States and its two communist opponents. While
Americans viewed all communist nations as a united enemy, the
relationship between the Soviet Union and China showed signs of strain
by the early 1970s. Kissinger decided to use this widening rift to his
advantage. If the United States improved its relationship with China,
the Soviets would have no choice but to cooperate with the U.S., or risk
become isolated.

…Moscow’s goals in Czechoslovakia led most observers on both sides of
the iron curtain to regard the intervention as a decisive Soviet
victory. In the arena of east-West confrontation, the negative
repercussions of the operation were short-lived. Relations with the west
experienced some setbacks, particularly for the recently concluded
Nuclear Non-proliferation treaty. The Strategic Arms Limitation Talks
(SALT) was also delayed; President Johnson refused to travel to
Leningrad in September 1968 and his successor, President Nixon,
hesitated to reestablish contacts in 1969. Ultimately, however, the need
to involve Moscow in negotiations with North Vietnam eclipsed American
indignation, and Washington soon proved willing to mend fences in the
interest of détente […]
The invasion was most significantly experienced within the socialist
community. It created instant tensions with the East European nations
that had not taken part in the operation. As for the nations remaining
in the Soviet-led alliance, the invasion confirmed that autonomous
political reforms would not longer be tolerated. In the broader
international socialist movement, the invasion seriously damaged Moscow
ability to mount a united front against the Chinese… [Matthew J,
OuitmetThe Rise and Fall of the Brezhnev Doctrine in Soviet Foreign
Policy, ]

By 1977, the Soviet government,
led by Leonid Brezhnev (1906-1982) and Aleksey Kosygin (1904-1980), was
made up of old hard-line Communists who had been raised under the
tutelage of Stalin. Valtman was prescient in his speculation that a new
breed, who had never known the ideological fervor of the Russian
Revolution, would lead the Soviet Union in a more modern direction.

Conrad, President Carter acting as Sisyphus, 1978. The cartoon
portrays Carter attempting to push a giant boulder composed of Egyptian
President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin up a
mountain, referring to Carter’s struggles in brokering a peace treaty
between Israel and Egypt.

"Explain slowly--what does he need all those weapons for, and why does he need nuclear reactors?"
The Washington Post, March 20, 1975, Herbert L. Block

Secretary of State Henry Kissinger delivering a box of nuclear material
to Iranian Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. In 1975, the United States signed
a cooperative agreement with then-ally Iran, permitting the U.S. to
sell nuclear energy equipment to the middle eastern country.

Shah of Iran, le Nouvel Observateur, 4 novembre 1977, Wiaz

In 1971, when the 'junket' to Persepolis was organised, the
Shah of Iran was embarking on one of the twentieth century's most
blatant exercises in megalomania and tyranny. The sudden surge in Iran's
oil revenues seemed to remove all limits to his two central ambitions:
to enrich his own family, and to build the most powerful arsenal on
earth, outside the United States and Russia. The following year, United
States President Nixon and Secretary of State Kissinger visited the
Shah, appropriately enough on their way back from peace talks in Russia.
There, as representatives not merely of their country's government but
also of its armaments industry, they wrote the Shah a blank cheque for
any American arms he wanted to buy. In February 1973, the Pentagon
revealed that the Shah had contracted to buy two thousand million pounds
worth of arms from the United States, a figure which represented about a
quarter of the entire national income of Iran. The American arms
manufacturer Grunman spared no pains to win the Shah to the delights of
their new jet fighter, the Tomcat. In his book, The Arms Bazaar, Anthony
Sampson (now a colleague of Dr Owen's in the Social Democratic Party)
described the scene near Washington when the Shah was shown the plane by
Grunman:

The Tomcat performed amazing acrobatics touching
down in front of the Shah and then shooting up again like a rocket. The
Grunman men observed the Shah's delight as he illustrated the swoop with
his hands.

The contract was signed, naturally not without a
little bit of corruption. Houshang Levi, an 'arms lobbyist', got his
cut, a standard 28 million dollars. The Shah's zest for more weapons
obliged him to help himself more and more liberally to his country's
straining coffers. As opposition grew to his policies, he redoubled his
already monstrous power. His secret police, SAVAK, modelled itself on
the KGB both for efficiency in detecting dissidents and in ruthlessness
in dealing with them. Torture of political and religious dissenters was
widespread, and well documented. [Paul Foot, (1983) HIM and his Friends, Socialist Register, Vol 20 ]

Ray Osrin, ...And No Further Interference Into The Internal Affairs Of Iran, Ohio -- Cleveland, 5th November 1980

This editorial cartoon depicting Ayatollah Khomeini with a voting
machine with the names Reagan, Anderson and Carter on it under his robe,
refers to Ayatollah's interference in the 1980 election, which indeed
marked a true sea change in American history. Reagan was FDR in reverse,
and made it clear that as president he intended to dismantle the
welfare state created under the New Deal. Like his Republican
predecessors Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge in the 1920s, Reagan
planned to lower taxes on the rich in order to stimulate America's
productive energies.

In June 1980 the shah, then in Cairo, died, prompting speculation that
the crisis might end. Khomeini, however, had other ideas, demanding the
return of the shah's assets, the release of Iranian assets in the United
States, and a U.S. pledge not to interfere in Iranian affairs. When
that wasn't forthcoming, on September 9 the Iranian government informed
Carter through the West German foreign minister, who was in Tehran, that
Khomeini was ready to discuss a resolution of the hostage situation. A
breakthrough finally occurred on September 22, 1980, when Iraq and Iran
went to war; suddenly Khomeini realized his nation could not take on two
powerful enemies at once. According to Gary Sick "Suspicions
about a deal between the Reagan campaign and Iran over the hostages
have circulated since the day of President Reagan's inaugural, when Iran
agreed to release the 52 American hostages exactly five minutes after
Mr. Reagan took the oath of office. Later, as it became known that arms
started to flow to Iran via Israel only a few days after the
inauguration, suspicions deepened that a secret arms-for-hostages deal
had been concluded."

Paul Conrad, Los Angeles Times (February, 1987).

The Iran-Contra affair was a
constitutional crisis that embroiled the Reagan administration in its
last two years (1986-88), raised the prospect of Ronald Reagan’s
impeachment, clouded the presidency or George H.W. Bush and contributed
to keeping it from extending to a second term. The scandal entailed
illegal funding and arming of Nicaragua’s right-wing contras fighting
the leftist Sandinista regime as well as illegally trading arms with
Iran. Cartoon is inspired by Bernard Gillam and his attacks on James
Blaine in 1884.

Between 1985 and 1990 Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev (1931- )
steered Russia's foreign relations in a new conciliatory direction by
working with Presidents Reagan and Bush to sign a series of arms control
agreements, withdrawing Soviet troops from Afghanistan, and improving
relations with China. He also transferred power from the Communist Party
to elected legislatures in Russia's union republics. Such developments,
along with the fall of the Berlin Wall and unification of East and West
Germany, signaled the end of the Cold War. Gorbachev leads the funeral
procession in Valtman's imaginative, skillfully realized drawing which
memorializes the demise of communism as its hallowed trinity-Karl Marx
(1818-1883), Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924), and Joseph Stalin (1879-1953)
look on in consternation.

Dmitri Medvedev
left the Russian presidency in May 2012. Many political cartoonists,
portrayed him as the ultimate ‘mini-me’ to Vladimir Putin, the puppet on
a string, the dog ordered to fetch, basically a doormat.

President Bush
and his White House counsel Alberto Gonzales had done everything they
could to unleash military and CIA interrogators from the constraints of
the Geneva Convention and common human decency. The result was the sad
spectacle that transpired inside the crumbling walls of Abu Ghraib
prison in Iraq which is the subject of this cartoon.

According to Human Rights Watch, World Report 2006;

Authorized Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) interrogation techniques
apparently include a notorious method the administration has renamed
“waterboarding” (when practiced by Latin American dictatorships, it was
called “the submarine”)—forcefully submerging a suspect’s head in water or
otherwise making him believe he is about to drown. The director of the CIA
has stated that waterboarding is a “professional interrogation technique.”
As noted above, the Bush Administration asserts that U.S. treaty obligations
to refrain from cruel, inhuman and degrading (CID) treatment do not apply
to the conduct of nonmilitary U.S. personnel interrogating non-U.S. citizens
outside of the United States.
Led by Vice President Cheney, the Bush administration strongly resisted
efforts by Congress to strengthen the legal ban against torture. A measure
proposed by Republican Senator John McCain to prohibit torture and other
ill-treatment of detainees anywhere by the U.S. military and the CIA passed
90-9 in the Senate but at this writing had not been approved by the full
Congress at least in part because of administration objections

More than 100 professors of law and legal studies sent an open letter to
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales in April 2006, criticizing his
failure to condemn as illegal a number of abusive interrogation
techniques, including waterboarding, exposure of detainees to extreme
temperatures, forced standing, binding in stress positions, and severe
sleep deprivation. The letter, whose signatories included several former
government attorneys, asks Gonzales to issue a clear public statement
regarding the humane treatment of detainees overseas, and to clarify
that abuses such as waterboarding are subject to prosecution as crimes.

The 2006 Defense Authorization Act, passed by Congress in January 2006,
contains new provisions clarifying that all individuals acting under the
color of U.S. law categorically are prohibited from engaging in or
authorizing cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of detainees in U.S.
custody. These provisions were passed by Congress to rectify lack of
clarity in regard to detention and interrogation techniques, and to
prevent conduct that is prohibited by international law and illegal
under domestic criminal law.

We are particularly concerned about your continuing failure to issue
clear statements about illegal interrogation techniques, and especially
your failure to state that “waterboarding”—a technique that induces the
effects of being killed by drowning—constitutes torture, and thus is
illegal. We urge you to make such a statement now.

Bush's Last Year as President, Mont Wolverton, 2007

Wall Street Bailout, Pat O'Connor, Los Angeles Daily News, 2008

Jacques Chirac's offer of friendship to George Bush

President Bush's Term Comes to an End, Adam Zyglis, The Buffalo News, 2008

Steve Benson, Arizona Republic

Steve Sack, Minneapolis Star-Tribune

John Sherffius, Boulder Daily Camera

Pete King doesn't look like McCarthy, but he sure sounds like him: Are
you now, or have you ever been, a Muslim? The very title of his hearings
tells his bias from the beginning: "The Extent of Radicalization in the
American Muslim Community (which presumes such radicalization exists)
and That Community's Response" (which presumes it's been anything but
cooperative). In fact, long before the hearings began, King had already
announced his belief that 80 percent to 85 percent of American mosques
are controlled by Islamic radicals; and that American Muslims have
refused to cooperate with law enforcement officials in combating
terrorism.

Neither of which is true. In fact, Richard Cohen of The Washington Post
writes that a recent Duke University/University of North Carolina study
found "a drop in attempted or actual terrorist activity by American
Muslims -- 47 perpetrators and suspects in 2009, 20 in 2010." Perhaps
more significantly, the report by UNC terrorism expert Charles Kurzman
showed that "the largest single source of initial information" about
alleged terrorist plots -- 48 out of 120 cases since September 11 --
"involved tips from the Muslim American community." In fact, the only
law enforcement official to testify before King's committee was Los
Angeles Sheriff Leroy Baca, who praised the cooperation of the Southern
California Muslim community.
Bill Press, "Joe McCarthy is born again -- as Peter King", Tribune Media Services, March 10, 2011

President Obama and the problem of Taliban, Nate Beeler, The Washington Examiner, 2011

On September 2013,
Russian President Vladimir Putin wrote an op-ed in New York Times urging
President Obama not to strike Syria, arguing that "It is extremely
dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional, whatever
the motivation”. "American exceptionalism"-- a combination of simple
nationalism and a belief that the United States can and should play a
special role in shaping the world, was at the core of Obama's
justification for American strike. Putin made a number of points, many
of which were also made by American analysts, he stated:

The potential strike by the United States against Syria, despite strong
opposition from many countries and major political and religious
leaders, including the pope, will result in more innocent victims and
escalation, potentially spreading the conflict far beyond Syria’s
borders. A strike would increase violence and unleash a new wave of
terrorism. It could undermine multilateral efforts to resolve the
Iranian nuclear problem and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and further
destabilize the Middle East and North Africa. It could throw the entire
system of international law and order out of balance.(...) Syria is not
witnessing a battle for democracy, but an armed conflict between
government and opposition in a multireligious country. There are few
champions of democracy in Syria. But there are more than enough Qaeda
fighters and extremists of all stripes battling the government.(...)
Under current international law, force is permitted only in self-defense
or by the decision of the Security Council. Anything else is
unacceptable under the United Nations Charter and would constitute an
act of aggression.(...) It is alarming that military intervention in
internal conflicts in foreign countries has become commonplace for the
United States. Is it in America’s long-term interest? I doubt it.
Millions around the world increasingly see America not as a model of
democracy but as relying solely on brute force, cobbling coalitions
together under the slogan “you’re either with us or against us.

Iran's president
has accused the West of nuclear "intimidation" in a UN General Assembly
address boycotted by the United States and Israel. It was using a
nuclear arms race to threaten other nations to accept the status quo,
said Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. He told reporters later that Iran was ready
for talks with the US. The West suspects Iran of trying to develop
nuclear weapons, but Tehran insists its nuclear programme is solely for
peaceful purposes. 'Soulful breeze' It was Mr Ahmadinejad's eighth and
final speech at a debate of the UN General Assembly before he steps
down. "[The] arms race and intimidation by nuclear weapons and weapons
of mass destruction by the hegemonic powers have become prevalent," he
told the 193-nation annual gathering. BBC - 26 September 2012

Patrick Chappatte of Switzerland for the International Herald Tribune.

On Friday afternoon of September 27, 2013, U.S. President Barack Obama
and Iranian President Hasan Rouhani held a brief and apparently cordial
conversation, the first such interaction between the leaders of the two
countries since the Iranian Revolution in 1979.
It concluded with small courtesies magnified by their historic import.
Mr. Rouhani said, “Have a nice day,” in English. Mr. Obama thanked him
and said goodbye in Farsi. The call between the leaders was the
culmination of a dizzying week of diplomacy during the annual United
Nations meetings in New York.

The Haaretz’
editorial cartoon shows Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President
Hassan Rouhani of Iran walking into the UN building in New York, in
September 2013. Netanyahu holding his bomb diagram cartoon, that used in
his 2012 speech is thinking, “Where is Mahmoud when I need him.” The
former Iranian hard-line president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was an easier
foil for Netanyahu.

According to Haaretz, (Sep. 20, 2013):

Call it a charm offensive, seduction sortie, bewitchment blitz or wooing
war, one thing is certain: Iranian President Hassan Rohani is waging an
all-out public relations onslaught on American hearts and minds that
poses unprecedented new challenges for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
and other Israeli policymakers.

Following initial skirmishes and reconnaissance patrols over the past
few weeks on Twitter and Facebook, Rohani has now unleashed a
preparatory salvo of moderate-sounding, peace-hugging statements on NBC
and in the Washington Post. The main thrust of his campaign will be
rolled out next week in New York, where Rohani will use his status as
the star sensation of this year’s United Nations General Assembly to
launch a barrage of interviews, speeches and public appearances, all
aimed at convincing America of Iran’s benevolent policies and benign
nuclear plans.

The Financial Crisis and Great Recession,

The sub-prime mortgage crisis of 2008

Eugene Fama, a Chicago University economics professor who in the 70s
came up with the efficient markets hypothesis (EMH), which stated that
financial markets price assets at their true worth based on all the
publicly available information, encouraging the belief that the best
thing to do was to pile in when prices were rising. Bubble-think, in
other words.

The changes pushed through in the US and the UK in the 80s by Ronald
Reagan and Margaret Thatcher removed constraints on bankers, made
finance more important at the expense of manufacturing and reduced union
power, making it harder for employees to secure as big a share of the
national economic cake as they had in previous decades.
After a fierce lobbying campaign, Bill Clinton agreed to repeal the
Glass-Steagall Act, which ensured a complete separation between
investment and retail banks. The move heralded the coming of superbanks,
huge behemoths that took in retail deposits and used them to take
highly-leveraged punts in the markets.

As chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, who was given an
honorary knighthood in 2002 for his "contribution to global economic
stability", cut interest rates and left them at rock-bottom levels for
two years.
Cheap borrowing costs encouraged Americans to load up on debt to buy
homes, even when they had no savings, no income and no job prospects.
These so-called sub-prime borrowers were the cannon fodder for the
biggest boom-bust in US history. The housing collapse brought the global
economy to its knees.

In Britain Sir Mervyn King, who became Bank of England governor in
2003, failed to "lean against the wind" during the economic upswing,
leaving interest rates too low, and then waited too long when the
economy was nosediving into its most severe postwar recession before
cutting bank rate.
Gordon Brown's last big speech as chancellor of the exchequer before
becoming prime minister, made at the Mansion House in June 2007 just as
the financial crisis was about to break, praised the bankers for their
remarkable achievements and predicted "the beginning of a new golden age
for the City of London".

The US treasury secretary in 2008, Hank Paulson big mistake was to put
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into conservatorship, wiping out the stakes
of those who had invested $20bn in the two government-backed mortgage
lenders over the previous 12 months.
Unsurprisingly, there was no great rush among private investors to
rescue Lehman Brothers when it ran into trouble the following week, and
when the US treasury allowed the investment bank to go bust every
financial institution in the world was seen as at risk.

Paulson triggered the biggest economic downturn since the Great Depression. (Larry Elliott, economics editor The Guardian, Friday 3 February 2012)

Financial Bailout of Greece by Eu, Arend van Dam, Netherlands, 2011

Schrank, The Independent, May 2012

David Cameron, François Hollande, Barack Obama, and Angela Merkel at the
Delphic temple for oracle of Delphi. Obama asks, "Will Greece crash out
of the eurozone, oh oracle?" The oracle replies, "That'll be another
100bn euros".Despite receiving billions of euros in bailout funds,
Greece was still in danger of being forced to leave the euro (the famous
Grexit). The cartoon relates to the G8 summit at Camp David, where the
eurozone crisis was top of the agenda.

Warren E. Buffett, the billionaire investor known as the Oracle of Omaha, in an op-ed titled Stop Coddling the Super-Rich,
published on August 14, 2011 in the New York Time, made a strong case
that he and his mega-rich peers should be paying more in taxes

OUR leaders have asked for “shared sacrifice.” But when they did
the asking, they spared me. I checked with my mega-rich friends to
learn what pain they were expecting. They, too, were left untouched.
While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while
most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get
our extraordinary tax breaks... My friends and I have been coddled
long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress. It’s time for our
government to get serious about shared sacrifice.Warren E. Buffett, Stop Coddling the Super-Rich, August 14, 2011

Uncle Sam bewildered in between the Tea Party, on the right, and
Occupy Wall Street, on the left, movements, Kal, 2011. Kal finds the
both movements loud and confusing for poor Uncle Sam.

The Tea Party demand vs Occupy Wall Street demands, Vines,
2011. It appears that Vines is more sympathetic towards the Tea Party's
single demand.

An unsympathetic view from the right suggesting Occupy Wall Street would lead to communism.

Time to Take Occupy Wall Street Seriously, Cam, 2011. Cam warns
that if the movement is not taken seriously heads may role by
guillotine.

An interesting take on the issue, a mea culpa admission.

"I liked it when it was Egypt, but not here," a play on the hypocrisy of men in suits

News that the International Monetary Fund initially demanded to loot a
shocking 40% of savings from the private bank accounts of Cypriots
underscores how residents of the Mediterranean country could be the
latest victims of the infamous “IMF riot,” as the chief economist of the
German Commerzbank calls for Italians to be similarly plundered for 15%
of their savings.

According to Pimco CEO Mohamed El-Erian in an interview with CNBC ; the
decision to loot the bank accounts of Cypriot savers could blow up
Europe and lead to civil unrest across the continent.
-
El-Erian said that the European Union had lit two sticks of dynamite in
backing a proposal that could see bank accounts raided for up to 15% of
their value in what has ludicrously been described as a “wealth tax” yet
amounts to nothing less than an act of wanton financial plunder.
-
“By including small depositors, they are risking social unrest,
political disorder, and potentially an exit from the eurozone,” said
El-Erian, referring to people with under 100,000 euros who will still be
hit by a levy of 6.75% under current proposals. Savers with 500,000
euros in the bank face losing as much as 75,000 euros.

Americans awoke Tuesday, October, 1st, 2013, to the fact that nearly
half the federal government was shut down, and to a certainty that
one-sixth of the U.S. economy was profoundly altered via Obamacare.
Senator Ted Cruz was leading the charge in the Senate (and apparently
the House) to defund the Affordable Care Act. He stated

" I intend to donate my salary to charity for each day the government is
shut down. Elected leaders should not be treated better than the
American people, which is precisely why hardworking Americans deserve
the same Obamacare exception that President Obama has already granted
Members of Congress.”

Hundreds of thousands of "nonessential" government became idled for
hours, days, weeks. Many federal offices were closed, workers furloughed
while Congress tried to unknot itself. (Essential services — cutting
Social Security checks, patrolling the border, keeping airports safe —
were continued.)
The Republicans argued that Obamacare's mandates are so unpopular that
Americans will understand a shutdown.

The Republican-led House of Representatives insisted on delaying
President Barack Obama's healthcare reform - dubbed Obamacare - as a
condition for passing a bill.
More than 700,000 federal employees faced unpaid leave with no guarantee
of back pay once the deadlock was over.
It was the first shutdown in 17 years.
President Obama blamed the House of Representatives for the stalemate
and said he would "keep working to get Congress to reopen the government
[and] restart vital services".

The Snowden Affair

The whistle-blower Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old former technical
assistant for the CIA and an employee of the defence contractor Booz
Allen Hamilton, was responsible for one of the most significant leaks in
US political history. He said he was content to sever his 'very
comfortable life,' which included a six-figure salary, a girlfriend, a
home in Hawaii and his family, to shine a light on the NSA's widening
surveillance net.

'I'm willing to sacrifice all of that because I can't in good conscience
allow the U.S. government to destroy privacy, internet freedom and
basic liberties for people around the world with this massive
surveillance machine they're secretly building... NSA chiefs were
'intent on making every conversation and every form of behavior in the
world known to them, ... I don’t want to live in a world where there's
no privacy and therefore no room for intellectual exploration and
creativity. The government has granted itself power it is not entitled
to.''

Scott Stantis, Obama and Bush-Nixon legacy

According to Lee-Anne Goodman,

"Not so long ago, a bad week for U.S. President Barack Obama was one
that sparked comparisons to Jimmy Carter, a popular whipping boy for the
right who was considered weak and ineffectual by many Americans. Seven
months into his second term, and the Carter comparisons are a distant
memory: now Obama’s being likened to former presidents Richard Nixon and
George W. Bush, popular targets for the commander-in-chief’s liberal
base.

Revelations about the Obama administration’s sweeping surveillance
practices, as well as the ongoing investigation into the IRS’s targeting
of Tea Party organizations, have resulted in a litany of comparisons to
both former presidents in recent weeks.
Edward Snowden himself, a libertarian who donated to Ron Paul’s
presidential campaign in 2012, made the comparison in explaining why he
leaked details of two top-secret U.S. government surveillance programs
to two news organizations last week.
“I believed in Obama’s promises,” Snowden told Britain’s The Guardian.
“He continued with the policies of his predecessor. I do not want to
live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded

.”

A hero or a traitor?

Oliver Stone, the Oscar-winning director whose profound understanding of
freedom and democracy is a breath of fresh and uncontaminated air in
Obama's era defended the American whistlebower Edward Snowden:

"It's a disgrace that Obama is more concerned with hunting down Snowden
than reforming these George Bush-style eavesdropping techniques. (...)
To me Snowden is a hero because he revealed secrets that we should all
know, that the United States has repeatedly violated the fourth
amendment".

John Cassidy of New Yorker agrees

"He is a hero. In revealing the colossal scale of the U.S. government’s
eavesdropping on Americans and other people around the world, he has
performed a great public service that more than outweighs any breach of
trust he may have committed.(...) So, what did the leaks tell us? First,
they confirmed that the U.S. government, without obtaining any court
warrants, routinely collects the phone logs of tens of millions, perhaps
hundreds of millions, of Americans, who have no links to terrorism
whatsoever. If the publicity prompts Congress to prevent phone companies
such as Verizon and A.T. T. from acting as information-gathering
subsidiaries of the spying agencies, it won’t hamper legitimate
domestic-surveillance operations—the N.S.A. can always go to court to
obtain a wiretap or search warrant—and it will be a very good thing for
the country."

German Chancellor Angela Merkel uses her mobile phone before a 2011
meeting at a European Union summit in Brussels. News magazine Der
Spiegel reported that an apparent NSA document indicates Merkel's phone
was first listed as a target in 2002.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel complained to U.S. President Barack
Obama after receiving information her phone may have been monitored.
Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich was quoted as telling newspaper
Bild am Sonntag he wants "complete information on all accusations" and
that "if the Americans intercepted cellphones in Germany, they broke
German law on German soil." He added wiretapping is a crime and "those
responsible must be held accountable."
News magazine Der Spiegel, whose research prompted the government's
response, reported that a document apparently from an NSA database
indicates Merkel's cellphone was first listed as a target in 2002.
The magnitude of the eavesdropping is what shocked us," former French
Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said in a radio interview. "Let's be
honest, we eavesdrop too. Everyone is listening to everyone else. But we
don't have the same means as the United States, which makes us
jealous."

President Obama was aware of NSA
spying on German Chancellor Angela Merkel since 2010, German media have
revealed. An NSA spokeswoman later denied the allegations.
According to German Bild am Sonntag newspaper, which cited US
intelligence sources, National Security Agency chief Keith Alexander
briefed Obama on the bugging operation against Merkel in 2010.
"Obama did not halt the operation but rather let it continue," an
unnamed high-ranking NSA official told the newspaper.
Moreover, the paper said, the US president later ordered the NSA to
prepare a comprehensive dossier on Merkel.

Obama and the Arab Spring,

Gen. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, Egypt's top military commander, told the
country that Egypt's constitution had been suspended and President Morsi
had been replaced by the head of the constitutional court until new
elections could be held. No timetable for those elections were spelled
out. The general warned the Egyptian people to protest peacefully and
said the authorities would not tolerate any violence.

"US
Secretary of State John Kerry has again refrained from characterising
the ousting of Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi by the military as a
coup. Washington's hesitation to use the term has drawn accusations from
the pro-Morsi camp that the US was complicit in the coup. For the White
House, it is an on-going and agonising determination that has legal and
possibly even security implications". BBC

Despite his failings, and there were plenty, President Mohamed Morsi was
Egypt’s first democratically elected leader, and his overthrow by the
military on Wednesday was unquestionably a coup. It would be tragic if
Egyptians allowed the 2011 revolution that overthrew the dictator Hosni
Mubarak to end with this rejection of democracy. Crisis in Egypt NY Times, Editorial. July 3, 2013

The impasse into which Egypt has been forced by the army's intervention
in politics is daily becoming more dangerous. Every time the security
forces open fire, their mission of bringing back order and restoring
social peace becomes less credible. You cannot advance toward legitimacy
over the bodies of martyrs. Editorial
The Guardian, Sunday 28 July 2013

Steve Bell, ceci n'pas un coup,
The Guardian, Monday 4 November 2013

... First, the hearing was delayed because Mohamed Morsi’s refusal to
recognise the authority of the court stretched to a refusal to wear the
required prison uniform. Then his repeated interruptions – “this is not a
legitimate trial, this trial is part of the coup” – and the chanting of
“illegal, illegal” by his 14 co-defendants, proved unendurable and
matters were put off until January. Out on the streets, the last-minute
change of venue, aimed at avoiding mass demonstrations, was only
partially successful.

It is difficult not to concede Mr Morsi’s point. Unpopular or not, he
was still democratically elected. Not only was his toppling in July a
coup; what has followed gives little cause for optimism. More than 2,000
Muslim Brotherhood supporters have been killed in clashes with security
forces, the organisation’s activities have been banned, and the
state-backed media has gone into overdrive whipping up anti-Morsi and
anti-US sentiment in equal measure. With freedoms increasingly
restricted, dissenters harassed, and the military back on top, Egypt
feels uncomfortably as if it has reverted to pre-Arab Spring type,
albeit without Hosni Mubarak.
The Independent, Editorial, Monday 4 November 2013

On March, 28 2014 Field Marshal
Abdul Fattah al-Sisi's announced that he has resigned as defence
minister to run for the presidency. The announcement was broadcast live
by Egyptian broadcast media.
Randall Enos' illustrations have appeared in The New York Times, NBC,
National Lampoon, Playboy, Boy's Life, Atlantic, Time, Sports
Illustrated, Fortune and Forbes

I've been working at this stand for 52 years making pretty pitchers fer
the people in just about every magazine and newspaper in the land except
that damned New Yorker who won't return my calls.

.

Fighters from the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) rapidly advanced through mostly Sunni areas of Iraq in June 2014,

Wealthy individuals
and religious foundations in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and elsewhere
in the Gulf have channelled millions of dollars to the anti-Assad
opposition, though it is not clear with what degree of official
connivance."There is Saudi money flowing into Isis but it is not from
the Saudi state," said Lina Khatib of the Carnegie Foundation.

The Obama administration signalled for the first time on June 16, 2014
that it was willing to enter into discussions with In an indication of
how sensitive in Washington any such cooperation would be, officials
quickly rowed back from remarks by Kerry, who had declined in an
interview to rule out military cooperation with Tehran. But officials
later insisted that any contact would be limited to informal discussions
that would take place on the margins of nuclear talks in Vienna..

Habazbuz, 1936: "The Iraqis are Brothers!",A cover of the Iraqi satirical newspaper
Habazbuz (حبزبوز) from November 1936, as submitted to the British
Foreign Office by some diplomat; whoever submitted it superimposed an
English translation

The Mulla : There is no differences between us O brethren!

The Priest: Since when has there been any differences? Have we not lived side by side for centuries?

The Rabbi : May the eye of him explode who says that any differences
exists between Iraqis. Are we not sons of one country, and as such
should we not live together like brothers?

Habazbuz : Such is what loyal sons of the country are expected to feel
like. May God bless you in whatever creed or sect you belong.

Pope Benedict's Resignation ,

On February 28,
2013, in an unexpected move, Pope Benedict XVI -- born Joseph Ratzinger
-- announced, that he is to resign. Benedict was elected pope in 2005
after the death of Pope John Paul II.
In his statement, Pope Benedict -- who was turning 86 in April -- said
he had come to the certainty "that my strengths, due to an advanced age,
are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry."

The big takeaway
from the plane chat, or at least the big media takeaway, was the pope's
acknowledgement that gay priests exist and that they have as much right
to their affinity with God as their heterosexual counterparts. When
asked about the so called "gay lobby" within the Vatican, the pope
replied:

When I meet a gay person, I have to distinguish between their being gay
and being part of a lobby. If they accept the Lord and have goodwill,
who am I to judge them? They shouldn't be marginalized.

(...)When the thorny issue of women in the church came up, the pope
kindly acknowledged that a woman's role "does not end just with being a
mother and with housework," (something mainstream society figured out
about a century ago). He went on to pay lip service to the need to
expand women's role in some way, but while he had no concrete ideas on
what this might entail, he made it clear than it would never include the
right to be ordained alongside men:

On the ordination of women, the church has spoken and said no. John Paul
II, in a definitive formulation, said that door is closed.

Bro Jonathan (the old name for Uncle Sam) trying to seduce Miss Canada, while the chaperon, John Bull, falling asleep.

In 1867, Canada became a federation under the British North America Act.
The anxiety over being annexed by the US was one of the key
contributing factors in the creation of Canadian Confederation. In the
election of 1864 the Republican Party used annexation issue to attract
Irish Americans vote. An annexation bill introduced by General Banks
was passed in the United States House of Representatives in July of
1866. The bill authorized the United States President to

"publish by proclamation that, from the date thereof, the States of Nova
Scotia, New Brunswick, Canada East, and Canada West, and the
Territories of Selkirk (present-day Manitoba), Saskatchewan, and British
Columbia, with limits and rights as by the act defined, are constituted
and admitted as States and Territories of the United States of America"
(Library and Archives of Canada)

The United States was to pay the Hudson’s Bay Company ten million dollars for the release of all of the property.

In 1896 the Liberals under Wilfrid Laurier came into power. Between 1896
and 1905 Clifford Sifton, the main character in this cartoon, who
became the new Minister of the Interior, assumed responsibility for
immigration and settlement in Canada. He offered Canada as a commodity
to potential overseas migrants, particularly to the American farmers,
who had skills and capital. Sifton, and his successors, believed the
darker the skin, the more 'foreign' the immigrant was. The ideal
immigrant should have had the same religious, political and social
institutions as the British.

During the 1980 referendum debate in Quebec, Pierre Trudeau had
committed to bring Quebec into Canadian confederation. He saw the way to
this end through the act of repatriating the Canadian Constitution form
Great Britain with an amending formula and entrenched rights for all
Canadians. After the Federal forces were victorious in the referendum,
Trudeau quickly set to work to come up with an agreement among the
Provincial Premiers which could be taken the British Parliament with the
request that they pass an act giving recognizing Canada's complete
sovereignty over all matters in Canada.

On April 17, 1982 after the Canada Act had been passed in the British
Parliament, it was signed into law by the Queen at a ceremony on
Parliament Hill in Ottawa. Canada finally had brought the constitution
and the Charter of rights and Freedoms home.

Aislin (Terry Mosher), November 1976, and September 2012.

The separatist Parti Québécois won its first election in November 1976
and changed Quebec's political landscape forever. The cartoon on the
left depicts a rumpled PQ leader René Lévesque standing beside a lean,
lanky and defeated federalist Liberal premier Robert Bourassa,(the
cartoon now sits in Montreal's McCord Museum of Canadian History). On
the right Pauline Marois the Parti Québécois leader who claimed victory
over the incumbent Liberal Party Leader Jean Charest is depicted with
François Legault, the leader of the third party CAQ.

A two-year inquiry into Brian
Mulroney’s dealings with German-Canadian arms lobbyist Karlheinz
Schreiber has concluded that the former prime minister acted in an
“inappropriate” way when he accepted large amounts of cash from
Schreiber.The report by Justice Jeffrey Oliphant said Mulroney “failed
to live up to the standard of conduct that he himself adopted in the
1985 ethics code.”

The Ghost of President Nixon consoling Prime Minister Stephen Harper

Harper persistently maintained that he knew nothing about the $90,000
cheque that his right-hand man gave to Senator Mike Duffy. In a bitter
speech in the Senate, Duffy tabled documents that showed a lawyer for
the Conservative Party of Canada also paid his $13,560 legal bill as
part of orchestrated effort to make the controversy over his living
expenses go away.

"The reality is,that Mr. Duffy still has not paid a cent back to the
taxpayers of Canada. He should be paying that money back. The fact that
he hasn't, the fact that he shows absolutely no regret for his actions,
and the fact that he has told untruths about his actions means that he
should be removed from the public payroll
... On our side, there is one person responsible for this deception.
That person is Mr. Wright.'
— Prime Minister Stephen Harper

According to Toronto Star it was Harper's administration culture that was responsible for this scandal.

It’s the kind of culture where enemies and secrecy abound. It’s a
culture that breeds devotion among Harper’s largely white, male,
pin-stripe-adorned disciples — not so much to a prime minister, but to
an all-powerful potentate, who must be protected, whatever the cost.
It’s a culture that permits a destructive hubris to flourish like a
drug-resistant virus until it can’t be halted by shopworn political or
public relations tactics.
This constellation of corrosive characteristics was, of course, the
defining nature of Tricky Dick Nixon and his criminal,
constitution-subverting co-conspirators in the Watergate affair.

Having unveiled its
proposal, which would ban public workers from conspicuous religious
garb, Culture Minister Maka Kotto, a rare members of a visible minority
in the PQ caucus justified the policy,

“If I wanted to play the mystic, I could go around with my panther’s
head on my chest. It’s my family totem. But I don’t, because I adhere to
what are accepted as the values of the society that welcomed me,”

Louis-Philippe Lampron, a law professor at Laval University, noted that
the values charter would require some people to shed an intrinsic part
of themselves while the majority doesn’t have to make the same
sacrifice.
“The charter says that if you want to integrate into Quebec society you
have to leave your religious symbols in the closet,” Prof. Lampron said.
Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau expressed disappointment in the proposed
Charter of Quebec Values. Prime Minister Stephen Harper reminded
reporters that Quebec's Parti-Quebecois government is a minority. He
says the opposition parties in the National Assembly will keep the
values charter from becoming law.

"Poloz's slave ship": Glob and Mail editorial cartoon by David Parkins.
Speaking to a House of Commons committee on November 2014, the Governor
of the Bank of Canada, Stephen Poloz, suggested young Canadians and
others struggling to find work should acquire more experience through
unpaid internships or volunteering until the country's hobbled job
market picks up.

In 1946 Winston Churchill asked Macmillan to join a committee to look
into reshaping the Conservative Party. On 3rd October, Macmillan
published an article in the Daily Telegraph where he suggested that the
name should be changed to the "New Democratic Party". In the article he
called for the Liberal Party to join Conservatives in an anti-socialist
alliance. He wrote in his diary that to obtain an alliance with the
Liberals, it would be worthwhile "to offer proportional representation
in the big cities in exchange."

Keith Waite, "WE'RE MERELY PROTECTING OUR UNDER COVER MEN."

John Profumo, the Secretary of State for War in the British government
under Conservative Prime Minister Harold MacMillan began an affair with
Christine Keeler, a London call girl in 1961. Keeler had been the lover
of Yevgeny "Eugene" Ivanov, a senior naval attache at the Russian
embassy in London. Profumo was forced to step down from his position on
June 5, 1963. An official report was released in September 1963 and a
month later Prime Minister MacMillan resigned claiming ill health.

On 3 December 1969, the British
cartoonist, Michael Cummings, outlines the inflexibility of the stance
taken by France's General Charles de Gaulle and his successor Georges
Pompidou regarding the issue of the United Kingdom’s accession to the
European Communities, despite efforts made by successive Prime
Ministers, Harold Macmillan and Harold Wilson, to comply with France’s
wishes.

Harold Wilson and Lyndon Johnson, On US entry into Vietnam War ,The New Statesman Magazine April 1965

‘One less obstacle, but not the
end of the road.' For the cartoonist Fritz Behrendt, a multitude of
problems awaits the British Prime Minster, Harold Wilson, before the UK
can accede to the European Communities, despite the exit of General de
Gaulle from the political stage. (12 June 1969)

The Heath Government was elected in June 1970 determined to take Britain
into the E.E.C. The key question was whether the French would agree?
Twice before, under De Gaulle, France had vetoed British applications.
De Gaulle's successor, Georges Pompidou, was known to be more
favourable, but a French "oui" could not be taken for granted. The key
question, posed by Pompidou to Heath was; is Britain ready to make "a
historic change in (its) attitude", a "fundamental choice" in favour of
the European Community?

In the wake of
the Treaty of Rome being signed in Parliament the cartoon cover by Glan
Williams for the edition of October 23 1971, shows a miniscule Edward
Heath handing over the British Isles on a platter to a cluster of
historical figureheads including Ceasar, Emperor Nero, Kaiser Willhelm,
Mussolini, Hitler, Richelieu and Napoleon.

Edward McLachlan, The SDP - pudding in danger - or - Carving up the votes, Mail on Sunday, 17 Apr 1983
This cartoon depicting Margaret Thatcher (Conservative)and Michael
Foot (Labour) carving of Roy Jenkins (SDP) is based on James Gillray's
cartoon The plumb-pudding in danger: - or - state epicures taking un
petit souper' depicting William Pitt and Napoleon Bonaparte; published
26 February 1805. Michael Foot inherited the leadership at the most
difficult time for the Labour party.Two things happened that made it
impossible for him to win the 1983 general election. First, in 1981, the
party came close to falling apart as the "gang of four" - Shirley
Williams, Bill Rogers, David Owen and Roy Jenkins - walked out and
formed the SDP in protest at his left-wing polices. Second the Falklands
War, which made Margaret Thatcher hugely popular – before then she had
been a very unpopular prime minister. Put together, it made it
impossible for Foot to carry victory.

Stanley Franklin, Daily Mirror

On 19 January 1976 Thatcher made a scathing attack on the Soviet Union,
declaring that “The Russians are bent on world dominance, and they are
rapidly acquiring the means to become the most powerful imperial nation
the world has seen...They put guns before butter...” The Soviet Defence
Ministry newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda (“red star”) gave her the nickname
"Iron Lady", and this was eagerly taken up by her supporters.

This cartoon was
published in the Daily Mirror the day after Thatcher's longest-serving
cabinet minister, Geoffrey Howe, delivered a scathing resignation
speech, voicing his discontent over her refusal to better integrate the
United Kingdom with European economies:

Trog [Wally Fawkes], Observer, 20 Mar 1988,
Thatcher retired from Parliament at the 1992 General Election, but she
left a lasting legacy. This cartoon by Brookes shows her as an elderly
and surprisingly masculine figure, rejoicing in the success of her
offspring - the New Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Steve Bell on the revelation that Tony Blair thought Gordon Brown 'mad, bad and dangerous'
Steve Bell’s career at The Guardian started in 1981. He was born in
London in 1951, he studied art at Leeds University and worked for
magazines including the New Statesman and Time Out before joining The
Guardian. His job gives him the chance to comment through humour on some
of the biggest events of the past 25 years and mercilessly rib the
people that made history. But altogether he was handed such ridiculous
looking characters as Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev to work with,
it was not always easy to produce a daily strip. He recalls struggling
with Neil Kinnock, the Labour leader from 1983 until 1992. He said:
"Kinnock was very hard to draw, because all there was to him was the
fact he was basically ginger. I always used to go big on the freckles,
just to add some definition. It wasn’t very fair, he wasn’t that freckly
but that was all I could think of for those nine long years.

Peter Brookes, The Times, May 25, 2010
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne's £6.2 billion of
budget cuts included banning first-class travel for government
departments, and scrapping chauffeur-driven cars for specific ministers.

Dave Brown, phone-hacking scandal at The News of the World with Rupert
Murdoch, Rebekah Brooks and David Cameron, The Independent, July 6, 2011
The phone-hacking by its journalists has led to the closure of the News
of the World newspaper, the establishment of the Leveson Inquiry, an
MPs' inquiry and the launch of three police investigations. According to
prosecutors Andy Coulson ( News of the World's editor between 2003 and
2007 and Prime Minister David Cameron's spokesman who quit in January
2011) and Rebekah Brooks ( the former tabloid editor and News
International chief executive) were among five people being charged in
connection with alleged payments to police and public officials.
In the conclusion of his lengthy investigation into the phone hacking
and other scandals surrounding News Corporation's British tabloids,
Lord Justice Brian Leveson, accused Rupert Murdoch, his son James and
News Corporation of either failing to address allegations of "widespread
criminality within the organization” or — if they didn’t know about it —
being guilty of a "significant failure in corporate governance."

Gary Barkers, David Cameron, Rupert Murdoch and Paul Stephenson, snug as a bug political cartoon, The Guardian
Rupert Murdoch's once-commanding influence in British politics dwindled
to a new low on July 12th 2012, when all three major parties in
Parliament joined in support of a sharp rebuke to his media empire and a
parliamentary committee said it would call him, along with two other
top executives, to testify publicly next week about the phone hacking
scandal enveloping his media empire. The following day, Murdoch's News
Corporation announced that it is withdrawing its bid for BSkyB.
Cameron's judgment, and that of the chancellor, George Osborne, in
appointing the former editor of the News of the World Andy Coulson as
their director of communications looked increasingly inexplicable.
Cameron was being accused of an improperly contractual relationship with
Neil Wallis, a former News of the World deputy editor, as his meetings
with News International executives in a year exceeded those with all
other news organisations put together. Not a single figure from the BBC
was granted an audience.
Implying that he could not impart operational information to Cameron
since he was too compromised with the chief suspects, Sir Paul
Stephenson announced he was stepping down as the UK's most senior police
officer. Just hours before his resignation, Deputy Prime Minister
Clegg, told the BBC that a growing public perception of police
corruption was deeply concerning. Stephenson dated his relationship to
Wallis back to 2006. From October 2009 to September 2010, Wallis's
part-time work at the Met involved strategic communications, advising
the commissioner, as the force said there was no need to reopen the
investigation into phone hacking at the News of the World.

Libor, the London inter-bank lending rate, is considered to be one of
the most crucial interest rates in finance, upon which trillions of
financial contracts rest, and the exposure of its rigging has shocked
many beyond the world of finance. Every day a group of leading banks
submit rates for 10 currencies and 15 lengths of loan ranging from
overnight to 12 months. Since the rates submitted are estimates not
actual transactions it's relatively easy to submit false figures
At the height of the financial crisis in late 2007, many banks stopped
lending to each other over concerns about their financial health with
some banks submitting much higher rates than others. Barclays was one of
those submitting much higher rates, attracting some media attention.
This prompted comment that Barclays was in trouble. Following much
internal debate and a controversial conversation with a Bank of England
official, Barclays began to submit much lower rates. The Libor scandal
has further undermined trust in banks. BBC

Economist David Blanchflower argued there is no longer a credible
candidate among top UK bankers to take over as the next governor of the
Bank of England in the wake of recent banking scandals. Professor
Blanchflower, who served on the Bank's monetary policy committee between
2006 and 2009, believed the escalating Libor crisis meant Sir Mervyn
King's replacement could not come from the banking sector. An internal
appointment was also out of the question, he argued, with Bank staff
such as deputy governor Paul Tucker facing criticism over their actions.
He proved to be right.

According
to Time magazine: "From the South Sea bubble in 1720 to the 1990s
implosions of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International and of
Barings Bank and through a gallery of rogue traders and dodgy deals that
have posed existential threats to financial institutions on several
continents during the past quarter of a century, the common factor is
not that they were caused by foreigners in London. London itself,
especially its compact financial district known as the City, is
implicated. ... Individuals and institutions may end up on trial. Yet a
swelling sentiment would like to see a bigger entity in the dock:
London. It's no longer enough to explain the City's supremacy as a
global incubator for scandals by citing its global supremacy as a center
for international finance, the world's most potent competitor to New
York City, a place where transactions covering literally trillions of
dollars, pounds and euros are executed every day."

The Spanish banking crisis, Chris Riddell, The Observer

In 2012, Spain asked euro region governments for a bailout worth as
much as 100 billion euros ($125 billion) to rescue its banking system,
thus becoming the biggest euro economy up to then to seek international
aid. In this cartoon UK prime minister David Cameron tells German
Chancellor Angela Merkel: "We must do something Angela!". Merkel
replies, "We?".

The Chancellor's New Clothes, 27 November, 2012
George Osborne stunned the markets by announcing that Mark Carney, the
Canadian central banker, will replace Sir Mervyn King as the next
Governor of the Bank of England.
Carney is "the outstanding central banker of his generation with
unparalleled expertise in financial regulation" Osborne said." He has
got what it takes to help bring families and businesses through these
incredibly challenging economic times...my responsibility was to get the
best for Britain, and with Mark Carney we've got that."
Canada came through the financial crisis of 2007-8 relatively unscathed,
thus boosting Carney's reputation. Under his governorship, the Bank of
Canada cut interest rates to record lows and supplied emergency
liquidity to the banking system to prevent a collapse.

Ben
Ben Jennings, The Guardian, Friday 13 September 2013

"The Bank is acutely aware of the risk of unsustainable credit and house
price growth and will be monitoring it closely," Mark Crney said in
Nottingham in August 2013.
"The important thing to recognise is that we now have tools other than
interest rates that can be used to contain risks in the property and
financial sectors. We are now fully prepared to deploy them if that were
needed."
The Bank could, he said, use its newer tools to recommend that banks and
building societies "restrict the terms on which new credit is provided,
or even to raise capital requirements on mortgage or other types of
lending".
This would allow the Bank to avoid raising wider interest rates across
the economy even as it acted to put the brakes on specific areas.

Joe Weisenthal, Business Insider of Financial Post on August 2913, asked Did Mark Carney make the best-timed job switch ever?

Mark Carney has been in office for barely over a month, and all the
economic data is looking bright. The history books will show a
remarkable rebound right as he assumed office. Brilliant timing.

November 2013,
Mark Carney was forced to defend his forward guidance against criticism
that the policy is ineffective.The Governor of the Bank of England told
lawmakers that he and fellow policymakers were wary about official
measures of investment in Britain. "We're not putting full weight on
that data and it has to be said that it doesn't entirely feel right that
investment is, as measured, falling at a time when we see continued
strengthening investment intention,(...) I was much more comfortable
with the data in Canada," Carney said.

Scotland voted decisively to stay in the United Kingdom by about 55% to 45%.

Prime minster Cameron promised draft legislation by the end of January
2015 on handing more powers over tax, spending and welfare to Scotland,
which should had come into effect after the May 2015 general election.
According to him:

"Just as Scotland will vote separately in the Scottish Parliament on
their issues, of tax, spending and welfare, so too England, as well as
Wales and Northern Ireland should be able to vote on these issues and
all this must take place in tandem with, and at the same pace as the
settlement for Scotland."

With devolution, labour Party faced the prospect of its Scottish MPs
being stripped of the power to vote on crucial issues such as health,
education and finance under PM Cameron's proposals, potentially
undermining a future Labour government.

Jean Eiffel,"Acceptez vous de prendre pour mari et légitime époux?", L’Express, septembre 1958
De Gaulle returned to power in 1958 thanks to the crisis of May 13. The
crisis stemmed from the institutional weakness of the Fourth Republic,
concentrating too much power in the parliament at the expense of the
executive branch. As a result there were 24 governments in 12 years
since the end of WWII. Meanwhile, the French army faced a daunting
crisis due to the uprising of French Algeria. De Gaulle agreed to
become President in exchange for constitutional reform

Fritz Behrendt, Algemeen Handelsblad, June 1962,
The German cartoonist reflects on the the oversized ego of General de Gaulle, President of the French Republic.

Michael Cummings (1919-*), 'Anything to declare, gentlemen?', L'Aurore, July 1961.
Paris customs officers Konrad Adenauer, German Chancellor, and Charles
de Gaulle, French President, ask Harold Macmillan, British Prime
Minister who tries to smuggle the Commonwealth into the common market
despite the warning: 'Common market: imports of special favours for the
Commonwealth and agricultural protectionism forbidden.'

The cartoonist, Spinga, legitimately asks if Bonapartism is not one of
the characteristics of French politics.
Obviously, there are differences between Gaullism and Bonapartism. De
Gaulle did not attack the civil liberty (assaults on the freedom of the
press had begun under the Fourth Republic during the war in Algeria). De
Gaulle never introduced aggressive militarist strategy ( in fact, his
most resolute opponents were senior army officers). Furthermore, De
Gaulle never aimed at establishing an empire. Nevertheless, some
elements of Bonapartism may be detected in the regime that he
established in 1962.
The Gaullists are supporters of a strong sovereign state. They like a
planned economy and a centralized authoritarian state led by a
charismatic and powerful leader such as Bonaparte or De Gaulle.

General de Gaulle’s European policy, Ekö, 7 September 1960

Charles de Gaulle’s road to Europe: not together, but side by side.’
Following a press conference held on 5 September 1960, General de Gaulle
is accused of rejecting supranationality as a means of unifying Europe;
instead, he develops his idea of a Europe of states. To the right of
the French President, German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer.

William Elias Papas, The Guardian, May 1967,
Charles de Gaulle's action plan towards the United Kingdom’s application for accession to the European Communities.

Lodge, Nevile Sidney, 1918-1989; Evening post (Newspaper. 1865-2002),1973
'Pardon, Monsieur The President, but as he was leaving, the New Zealand
Deputy Prime Minister scribbled on your front door!,' A disgruntled
Deputy PM has been to visit Pompidou to protest nuclear weapons testing
in the Pacific without success. To show his frustration, the visitor
has changed the name on the door to President Bombido and the
presidential aide is telling the president about the graffiti.

Fritz Behrendt, ‘A teaspoonful a day,’ 1974.
The French President, Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, and the German
Chancellor, Helmut Schmidt's recommended dose of European Economic
Community (EEC) medicine for the British Prime Minister, Harold Wilson's
ailment.

‘Ludwig, why are you opposed to this union?", Hans Geisen, 1964

In January 1963, Konrad Adenauer signed the Franco-German friendship
treaty with Charles de Gaulle in Paris. The "mystical communion" between
the two old Catholics was strong, and both men shared the same
political belief: Europe was no stronger than the bonds that linked
France and Germany. It was a far-reaching treaty, unique for both
countries in the kind of political machinery it set up.

However, a few months later Adenauer and his "German Gaullists" were
gone, and Chancellor Ludwig Erhard, an avowed Atlanticist, replaced
Adenauer as party leader. He understood that France could not provide
the protection the U.S. could, and noted the relative importance of
America in the world economy, thus believed it would be best to stick
with the Atlanticist approach. The Bundestag had added a preamble to the
treaty that de Gaulle told Willy Brandt was a "personal offense," and
the General, wearily, would remark that treaties, like young girls and
roses, faded all too quickly. Erhard’s emphasis on the primacy of
economics over concern for security and national interests first
reflects a basic tenet of Atlanticist thought: the west is linked not
just by common values and interests, but also by close economic ties
that link the interests of countries in a way that makes a pure
nationalist read on policy impossible.

"After so many years ..." Hans Geisen, Swiss, 1980

President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing and Chancellor Helmut Schmidt
pursuit of a policy of rapprochement between France and the Federal
Republic of Germany (FRG) is represented as the growing relationship of
the nascent collaboration of their predecessors, the German Chancellor
Konrad Adenauer and French President Charles de Gaulle.

Mirko Szewczuk, "Better holding Acheson's hand when Stalin is on the roof!", 1949

Dean Acheson was the first Secretary of State who visited the Federal
Republic. He was Truman's Secretary of State, and he came here at the
request of President Truman. It was extremely important and valuable for
us that it was Dean Acheson, whom I esteem highly, who came at that
time and the visit strengthened our morale profoundly. Adenauer

Dean Acheson visited Adenauer shortly after the founding of the Federal
Republic in November 1949. American policy aimed at integration of the
Federal Republic in the Western world. Gradually will Adenauer
revitalize the potentials of the Federal Republic.
However, the cartoonist suggests that the East German Prime Minister
Otto Grotewohl and the President of the Republic Wilhelm Pieck, acting
as Soviet leader Joseph Stalin's guard dogs, are the real threat. Otto
Grotewohl began taking an active part in the revived Social Democratic
Party of Germany after the defeat of the fascist regime in Germany. He
fought for the unity of the German workers’ movement as a result of
which the Communist Party and the Social Democratic Party of Germany
were united as the Socialist United Party in the eastern part of
Germany. At the unification congress in April 1946, Grotewohl was
elected to the Central Board of the Socialist United Party, and he and
Wilhelm Pieck became its chairmen. After the proclamation of the German
Democratic Republic on Oct. 7, 1949, he became the prime minister of the
GDR. Wilhelm Pieck who had moved to Soviet controlled Germany after the
Second World War, was elected President of the newly-established German
Democratic Republic in 1949. He was part of the 1919 Spartakist
rebellion, along with Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknechton, which had
been crushed and most of its leaders were arrested and executed, but he
was released unharmed, and remained active in the German Communist
Party.

The formation of the European
Common Market (composed of France, West Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
Belgium, and Luxembourg) in 1957 brought unprecedented prosperity to
those countries. By 1962, 11 additional countries in Western Europe had
applied to join. The Soviet Union and its East European satellites held
aloof, but Valtman suggests that they may be viewing the development
with considerable concern. Here Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev
(1894-1971) watches construction while his little dog (who resembles
East German leader Walter Ulbricht (1893-1973)) strains at the leash.

Plantu,‘I’ve even included a catalytic converter, just for you!’ , April 1985
The French President, François Mitterrand tries to sweeten the deal for
the German Chancellor Helmut Kohl as part of his plan for the Eureka
(European Research Coordination Agency) project, coordinating scientific
and technological research at Community level .

Walter Hanel, "Welcome", 1993
French President François Mitterrand and the German Chancellor Helmut
Kohl are standing at the door to welcome the accession of Austria,
Finland and Sweden to the European Community, but the quality of life
inside the house is not much different.

Steve Bell, Guardian, June 2004
Jacques Chirac gently decried George Bush's plan to reform Arab states
with free elections, independent media and improved legal systems.
Democracy was not a commodity that could be exported. It had to be an
Arab model of democracy not a western one.

Carlo Schneider, 2005

On 4 March, President Jacques Chirac announced that France will hold its
referendum on the European Constitution on 29 May 2005. Chirac’s
statement came less than two weeks after the Spanish people had voted
overwhelmingly in favour of the Constitution, albeit with a low turnout.
Just a few days before the announcement of the French date, the Dutch
government had decided to hold its consultative referendum on 1 June.
Against the background of the Constitutional Treaty’s rejection in the
referendums in France and the Netherlands in spring 2005, the referendum
euphoria changed into a referendum phobia. All member states except of
Ireland where a referendum was legally required decided to ratify the
Treaty of Lisbon via the parliamentary procedure only.

Christo Komarnitski, Apologies to Delacroix, Sarkozy and Carla Bruni.

Carla Bruni- Sarkozy's wife claimed to journalist Nathalie Saint-Cricq
that "Nous sommes des gens modestes". This invited ridicule in her bid
to recast her husband Nicolas a “man of the people". According to Daily
Telegraph reporter Henry Samuel; "The comment from the heiress to a tyre
fortune who earned almost £5 million per year at the height of her
catwalk fame has turned Mrs Bruni-Sarkozy into a laughing stock on the
internet. One commentator on Le Monde’s website describing the claim as
coming from “Marie Antoinette in Sarkoland.””.

Sarkozy's expulsion of Roma gypsies was a dark episode in the history of
France. According to Libération: “France stands accused”. It stated
that "the degraded image of Sarkozy’s France isn’t just an image. It’s a
reality as reported day after day in the foreign press.”

Dave Brown, The Independent 2012. Nicolas Sarkozy tried to exploit a
Toulouse shootings in March to boost his chances of re-election and
keep the focus on security.

Hagen, Verdens Gang - Oslo, Norway, 2012.

Sarkozy as the train bearer for the Miss France, who's no other than the far-right candidate Marine le Pen

After his electoral victory Francois Hollande went to Berlin to talk
with Germany's chancellor Angela Merkel. He stated "I want growth to be
not only a word, not just a word that can be uttered and followed by
tangible acts in proof. The best method is to put everything on the
table." and Merkel responded: "I am pleased that we have agreed on
talking about the different ideas in terms of growth. And I'm not
worried that we could not have common ground. Possibly we have some
different opinions but I really look forward to our cooperation."

When al-Qaeda-linked insurgents
who had took over the northern half of the Mali in 2012, and then in
the early January 2013, moved farther south, imperilling the capital,
Bamako, France’s Socialist president, François Hollande, who has been
wary of throwing his weight around in his country’s former colonial
domains, send troops to bolster Mali’s feeble and fractious
administration . According to Economist:

Getting into a war is always easier than getting out. France therefore
needs to limit its ambitions. ... Europeans and others should help with
economic development and military training. But for the country to have a
hope of working properly,
Malians must also sort out their chaotic politics. A year ago, soldiers
at the head of Mali’s ragged army overthrew an elected government. On
paper, civilians are back in charge, but no one is sure who really pulls
the strings. Outsiders can clear the way, but in the end it is the
Malians who must mend Mali.

Angela Merkel, is
having dinner with French president, François Hollande, at Das
Austerity Euro-Café. Austerity preaching Merkel is having a miniscule
single sausage for dinner, while Hollande is enjoying a sumptuous repast
and obviously ordering the most expensive wine from the list.

On January 2014, Didier Migaud, president of the independent Cour des
Comptes body, warned that France faced a costly increase in its debt
servicing costs once interest rates rise, as is likely when the economy
begins recovering.
"The level that's been reached has put our country in a danger zone,"
Migaud said. "Efforts undertaken so far are not sufficient to get out.
What wasn't done in 2011, 2012 and 2013 only adds to the extra distance
that will have to be travelled in the coming years," Migaud said. "This
extra distance won't be the least demanding - quite the contrary."

Chancellor Angela Merkel's Germany

Berlin was uneasy about Hollande's war. Experience has shown that those
involved, no matter what their capacity, can quickly become enmeshed in
war, said one source in the Merkel government. Germany feared that if
the French meet more resistance from the Islamists than expected, Paris
could request additional urgent military support from its partners. Such
a situation would have placed Berlin in a difficult dilemma, having to
choose between solidarity with France and its own declared unwillingness
to become directly involved in the fighting.

Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany frequently stressed the limits of
Germany’s powers to bail out other countries and rejected joint efforts
like eurobonds to pool debt. Behind the scenes, however, Ms. Merkel was
pressing allies in Paris, Rome and elsewhere to cede more power to
Brussels over their national budgets before Germany would agree to
provide further backing for efforts to bolster the euro zone.

Exhibition Tour:
small pointed compliant?
Putin of Russia and Merkel of Germany in the bustling Hanover
international trade-fair. the signs read; "Process automation control
technology", and Hanover trade fair. Merkel says; "So here is the
department 'short-process'... To which Putin thinks "Now she comes
right back with 'Pussy Riot'.

In November 2012, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Russian President
Vladimir Putin clashed in Moscow over human rights and democracy as they
struggled to show a united front amid rising criticism from Germany.
Putin fired back at the visiting German Chancellor for raising questions
about the imprisonment of the Pussy Riot protesters, suggesting she was
poorly informed about the punk group's true nature. The exchange, at a
Russian-German business forum in Moscow, came amid growing German
criticism of Russia's human rights record and its moves to crack down on
dissent.

Later in April 2013 when in Germany one of the world’s largest
industrial exhibitions - Hannover Messe-2013 opened, Russian President
laughed off a protest against him by topless women in Germany, joking
that he liked what he had seen while sharply rebuffing German criticism
of his human rights record. Merkel told Putin in a speech at the fair
that Russia needed "an active civil society" including freedom for
non-governmental organisations, after a wave of controversial state
inspections of foreign-funded NGOs in Russia.

Why Angela Merkel wins the election?

Chancellor Angela Merkel won a stunning, near-historic victory in
Germany's elections in September 2013, with her Christian Democrat-led
conservative bloc scoring 41.5 per cent of the vote to 25.7 per cent for
the Social Democrats, her main rivals. Under Germany's mixed-member
proportional electoral system, that left her five seats short of the
first single-party absolute majority in the Bundestag in 50 years.

I bet this is a friendship test, and the more you withstand, without defending yourselves, the more they respect you!

Now that a German intelligence official has been arrested under
suspicion of passing secret information back to America – potentially
concerning an NSA investigation, and reportedly under direction by the
CIA – finally the Merkel government is admitting that the long honeymoon
is over. Tap my cellphone, shame on you; fool me with a double agent,
shame on an ignorant nation. (Malte Spitz in Berlin, the Guardian ,
Monday 7 July 2014)

It is so relaxing
in China, You do not even deny that you're eavesdropping on me,so let's
drop pleasantries and go straight into talking business!

In February 2014, Putin
installed 150,000 troops along Ukraine's borders after the overthrow of
Moscow ally Viktor Yanukovych by pro-European protesters. President
Obama delivered a blunt warnings to Moscow. "We are now deeply concerned
by reports of military movements taken by the Russian Federation inside
of Ukraine," he told reporters at the White House. Ukraine accused
Russia of a 'military invasion and occupation', saying Russian troops
have taken up positions around a coast guard base and two airports on
its strategic Crimea peninsula. Ukraine's ousted president Viktor
Yanukovych made his first public appearance since fleeing the country in
the southern Russian city of Rostov-on-Don, not far from the Ukrainian
border. It was the first confirmation that he had left the country, and
he said he was 'forced' to do so only after his family received
threats.'I intend to keep fighting for the future of Ukraine,' he said.

The group, which
calls itself Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the West
(and goes by the German acronym PEGIDA), demonstrates against economic
migrants and a supposed "cultural foreign domination of our country" --
whatever is meant by that. Marian
Kamensky is the editorial cartoonist for the switzerland satirical
montly magazine Nebelspalter and Germany's satirical magazine
Eulenspiegel and the US-Payboy.

What is going on in Germany, the world's second most popular destination
for immigrants? Has the open-mindedness for which Germans had long been
praised now ended? Are we seeing a return of the vague fear of being
overwhelmed by immigrants that Germany experienced in the 1990s, when a
hostel for asylum seekers was burned down? How large is the new
right-wing movement, and will it remain limited to Dresden, or is it
spreading nationwide?

So far, protests held under the PEGIDA label in under cities -- like
Kassel and Würzburg -- have attracted only a few hundred people at a
time. In fact, some of the protests attracted significantly larger
numbers of counter-demonstrators. And while thousands of "patriotic
Europeans" aim to take to the streets in Dresden again in the coming
days, their counterparts in Germany's western states are taking a
Christmas break. PEGIDA supporters are waiting until after the holidays
to return to the streets in cities like Cologne, Düsseldorf and Unna. (The End of Tolerance? Anti-Muslim Movement Rattles Germany, By SPIEGEL Staff -December 21, 2014)

Edd Uluschak, "Funny,
you don't look like a decadent, warmongering, depraved imperialist,
capitalist dog." "Yes, but would you buy a used rick-shaw from him?"February 21, 1972

In the mid-1960s, having failed to win either the presidency or the
governorship of California, Richard Nixon had ample time to think about
international relations, his primary policy interest. Like most China
specialists, he concluded that the United States should end its efforts
to isolate China. After winning the presidential election, Nixon's
initial overtures to Chinese leaders won a favorable reception. The
Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution was burning out, and Mao Zedong
and Zhou Enlai were uneasy about what they perceived as the rising
Soviet threat. The invitation they issued to their suitors from
Washington indicated that a high-level mission to China would be
welcomed -- provided the Americans understood that resolution of
differences over Taiwan would be the price of rapprochement..

Herbert Block, “Mushrooming cloud,” Washington post April 1, 1965,

Communist China exploded its first atomic bomb in October 1964, and the
State Department warned in February 1965 that the Chinese, under Mao
Zedong, were preparing another nuclear test. The Soviet Union insisted
that the Chinese tests did not pose a threat,

Although he brought stability to China, violence was central to Deng
Xiaping's formation. As Roderick Macfarquhar and Michael Schoenhals
have shown in their epic book “Mao's Last Revolution”, Deng was
responsible for purges in the later years of the Cultural Revolution
that matched the Gang of Four for brutality. In 1975 he ordered the army
to crack down on a Muslim village in Yunnan province, an action which
resulted in 1,600 deaths including those of 300 children. Deng's
response to the student and worker protests 14 years later was hardly
out of character.

Deng Xiaoping will be remembered as the man who put China on the path to
economic reforms. He launched capitalist-style market reforms in 1978.
They helped push China through a metamorphosis from a drab Leninist
state solely dependent on its staid state economy to a dynamic economic
powerhouse. But according to state media, the Gini Coefficient for China
climbed from 0.18 in 1978 to 0.452 in 1995, and reached the warning
level of 0.51 in 2002. The index is an economic measurement of the
rich-poor disparity used by the United Nations and the World bank and a
reading between 0.3 and 0.4 is regarded as normal but 0.4 or above is
considered serious.

Tiananmen Square was followed by a period of repression marked by mass
arrests and executions. Thousands were jailed, harassed and threatened.
Some were executed, shot in the back of the neck, and photographs of the
bodies were posted all over the country as warnings. Human rights
groups reported that 50 to 100 people were executed in the wake of the
Tiananmen Square crackdown, some for things as minor as setting a police
motorcycle on fire or taking photographs of tanks around the square.
Another 15,000 to 20,000 were detained, with 99 of those still in prison
in ten years later.

Jiang Zemin's rise to power stemmed from a politburo purge of liberal
leaders in 1989, after the ruthless suppression of the pro-democracy
demonstrations in Tiananmen Square. Paramount leader Deng Xiaoping, who
held all the real power, needed to find a new protege to lead the
Communist Party. Jiang, who as Shanghai party chief had weathered the
student protests without resorting to violence, fitted the bill.
By the time Deng finally died in February 1997, Jiang Zemin had been
given enough time to establish himself.

Ingrid Rice, Vancouver Sun, November 26, 1996

Jiang Zemin who brought China into the World Trade Organization and
rebuilt ties to the United States after a breakdown in 1989, favored
deeper ties to the West and more opportunities for China’s private
sector. He did not possess the indomitable behind-the-scenes power of
Deng Xiaoping, who ushered in market reforms after the death of Mao
Zedong. But a year of division and uncertainty at the end of Hu Jintao's
tenure created openings for him to influence the election of Hu's
successor, Xi Jinping.

The Tiananmen Square massacre was a pivotal event in Jiang’s political
career. In 1989, as Party chief of Shanghai, Jiang suppressed the
liberal newspaper the World Economic Herald and, while other provincial
officials waited, very promptly supported the Central Party’s call for
martial law in mid-May.
According to The Real Story of Jiang Zemin, Deng Xiaoping, pleased at
Jiang’s show of toughness, secretly made him general secretary in the
days before the massacre. After the massacre, Jiang was responsible for
chasing down and suppressing the remnants of the democracy movement.

Hu Jintao succeeds Jiang Zemin

China’s top
Communist leaders, including Mao Tse-tung and Deng Xiao-ping, edge out
Tibetan deities before a horrified Tibetan monk. This refers to the
government’s mandate that a photo of the leaders be placed in Tibetan
monasteries at a time when monks continue to light themselves on fire to
protest Chinese rule.

Hu Jintao ensured that China would not repeat the same mistake as the
Soviet leaders, reforming politics before fixing the economy. He and
his Standing Committee colleagues focused nearly single-mindedly on
economic growth. The question facing him when he came into office was
what to do about the huge differences between the rich and the poor
across the country. But beginning in 2007, after the dramatic collapse
of Western export markets, he and his colleagues decided to focus on
economic growth, no matter how unevenly wealth was spread across
society. His original plans to lift taxes on farmers and concentrate on
social welfare were quickly shelved as the party bet that, by keeping
the economy humming above all else, it could stay a step ahead of the
lower classes' growing anxieties.

Hu's legacy included creating 96 Chinese billionaires - in US dollar
term, but 150 million Chinese still lived in poverty. The country became
the second richest in the world on aggregate, but per capita income
hovered near 90th, similar to per capita income in Cuba and Namibia.
Shanghainese enjoyed a per capita income of more than $12,000 a year.
Residents of Guizhou, China's poorest province, earned a mere $2,500 a
year.

“The
Dear Leader’s Death.” Chinese President Hu Jintao wipes tears off the
cheeks of Kim Jong Il’s successor with a special handkerchief, as
leaders of the United States, South Korea and Japan anxiously look on.

The Chinese government continues to systematically erase from the public
record any mention of the events of June 1989 that do not conform to
the government's assessment of the bloody crackdown as a "political
disturbance."
China's online censors quickly remove any references to the 1989
crackdown, and internet search engines in China are carefully calibrated
to filter out any images or references to the deaths of unarmed
civilians for search requests on topics including "Tiananmen Square" and
"June 4." Web searches for such terms typically yield "page could not
be found" messages, and generally do not inform the user that the search
has been censored.
Under dictates of China's official Propaganda Department, the domestic
print media are forbidden to publish articles on the events of June 1989
inconsistent with the government's version. In 2003, then-US Senator
Hillary Rodham Clinton pulled her memoirs from sale in China after it
was revealed that her Chinese publisher had without her approval omitted
her references to the 1989 democracy demonstrations in Tiananmen
Square.

As of June 2012, China was the second largest holder of U.S. securities
(after Japan) at nearly $1.6 trillion (down from $1.7 trillion as of
June 2011). Her large holdings of U.S. securities have raised a number
of concerns in both China and the United States. For example, in 2009,
(then) Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao stated that he was “a little worried”
about the “safety” of China’s holdings of U.S. debt. The sharp debate in
Congress over raising the public debt ceiling in the summer of 2011 and
the subsequent downgrade of the U.S. long-term sovereign credit from
AAA to AA + by Standard and Poor’s in August 2011 appears to have
intensified Chinese concerns. In addition, Chinese officials have
criticized U.S. fiscal and monetary policies, such as quantitative
easing by the U.S. Federal Reserve, arguing that they could lead to
higher U.S. inflation and/or a significant weakening of the dollar,
which could reduce the value of China’s U.S. debt holdings in the
future. Some Chinese analysts have urged the government to diversify its
reserves away from U.S. dollar assets, while others have called for
more rapid appreciation of China’s currency, which could lessen the need
to hold U.S. assets.

In contrast, the women married to previous Chinese leaders, from Deng
Xiaoping to Hu Jintao, and stayed largely behind the scenes, Peng
Liyuan, the wife of Xi Jinping appeared on national television in
January 2012 as the closing act of a military-themed Chinese New Year
gala. "People are who the Party cares about forever," Ms Peng, wearing a
white military uniform, sang to a rapt audience which included
President Hu Jintao and her husband. Peng Liyuan was already famous when
she met Xi Jinping in 1986.

Nicknamed "The Peony Fairy", Peng Liyuan joined the Chinese People's
Liberation Army early in her career and made her name as an entertainer
approved by the Communist Party, appearing frequently on state
television to sing propaganda songs with titles like Plains of Hope and
People From Our Village.Peng Liyuan did not always enjoy a rosy
relationship with the Communist Party. Like Xi Jinping, her family was
persecuted during the Cultural Revolution.In an interview with Chinese
television in 2004, Ms Peng said her father was categorised as a
"counter-revolutionary" because some of their relatives served in the
Taiwanese army.

The caption refers
to Confucius' dictum: "Discretion is the better part of valor!".
Angela Merkel tells Chinese President "Great! China will therefore
engage billions in euro crisis!" and then asks would it be in "Yuan or
U.S. dollar?" to which he replies " we thought more in terms of fortune
cookies!"

References

Parton James, Caricature and other comic art in all times and many lands, New York, Harper Brothers, 1877.

Wright Thomas, A history of caricature and grotesque in literature and art, London, Chatto & Windus, Piccadilly, 1875

Kris, E. (1934). The Psychology of Caricature. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis

Kris, E. and Gombrich, E. (1938). The Principles of Caricature. British Journal of Medical Psychology,17

Today Monday 25 January 2015 at 11:56 AMADD THIS ONE TO YOUR HOLOCAUST FAIRY TALE COLLECTION!!!!!

Another Great Performance by Elie Wiesel

by Daniel McGowan / December 15th, 2014

On December 8, 2014 WXXI-TV’s Great Performances
presented the legendary violinist Itzhak Perlman and the renowned
cantor Yitzchak Meir Helfgot in a musical exploration of liturgical and
traditional works for both chamber orchestra and klezmer settings. To
fortify its Jewish character the program included a short discussion
between Itzhak Perlman and Elie Wiesel, arguably the foremost proponent
of the current Holocaust narrative.

Wiesel told the
incredulous Perlman that as a boy he too had studied violin. Moreover he
claimed that he took his violin to Auschwitz in June 1944; his father
suggested that since Elie was already there he might as well try out for
the Auschwitz Orchestra in hopes of earning an extra ration of bread.
But alas Elie could only play classical music, like Beethoven, and not
those evil Nazi marches, so during his interview with the head of the
Auschwitz Orchestra a vicious kapo grabbed his violin and smashed it
under foot.

As
a Jew, I was proud of Perlman’s gracious restraint in not calling
Wiesel’s remarks utter nonsense. He did not even stoop to ask Elie how
such a tall story could have been omitted from Night, his best-selling
novel, which is force fed to American students as a must-be-believed
memoir.But I am tormented. Is it not shameful of The Great Weasel to
mention the existence of an Auschwitz Orchestra? An orchestra in an
extermination camp? What next? A swimming pool? Oy, what a shanda fur di
goyim.

And if we are to accept an inmate orchestra at
Auschwitz might we not envision a Klezmer band at Ketziot, Israel’s
largest concentration camp for Palestinians in the Negev Desert; it
could be called the Ketziot Klezmer Klub and give new meaning to the
otherwise odious acronym KKK.But wait; you must not mention an
Israeli concentration camp. Forget Ketziot. Do not compare the plight of
Jews with the plight of Palestinians; such a comparison according to
Elie Wiesel is “unworthy.” Just sit back and enjoy his “great
performance.”

Daniel McGowan is a Professor Emeritus at Hobart and William Smith Colleges.

US media ‘complicit in mass murder of Muslims’

The media in the United States is helping to create mass
murder of Muslims by hiding the shooting deaths of three American Muslim
students in the country, an American scholar says.

Kevin Barrett, founding member of Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance, made the remarks in a phone interview with Press TV on Wednesday while commenting on the murder of three Muslim students in a shooting incident in the US state of North Carolina.

The incident has not been given coverage “worldwide or
here in the United States as Charlie Hebdo incident,” Barrett said
because “the media here is complicit in the mass murder of Muslims.”

He added the media is “actually helping to create more such incidents.”

“It seems that the mainstream media as well as the extremist media
here in the United States are both complicit in genocide against Muslims
and the religion if Islam, and that they are also trying to
propagandize the world into a convincing…that Muslims don’t have right
to defend themselves against this kind of genocidal violence,” Barrett
said.

“They are simply the latest victims of anti-Muslim genocide which has
been created by elements that own most of the media here in the United
States,” he noted.

As an example for the ongoing “genocide” of Muslims,
Barrett mentioned the occupied Palestinian territories where “the
Zionists have been conducting slow motion genocide since the World War I
really, and certainly since the Nakba, or the mass murder of
Palestinians and the expulsion of the rest in 1948.”

Palestinians refer to the May 15, 1948 occupation of Palestine as the
Nakba Day, which means the Day of the Catastrophe in Arabic, to
solemnly commemorate the expulsion of more than 700,000 Palestinians
from their homeland in 1948.

Israeli forces have wiped nearly 500 Palestinian villages and towns
off the map, leaving an estimated total of 4.7 million Palestinian
refugees hoping for an eventual return to their homeland more than six
decades later.

“So we are facing a genocide of over a million people and Muslims
absolutely have the duty, not just the right but the duty, to defend
themselves by any means necessary against this genocide,” Barrett
stated.

“Every good person on earth also has this duty to stop this genocide
and bring the perpetrators, including those who own the American and
Western mainnstream media, to justice,” he concluded.

1 comment:

Dear Br Kevin I lived in Paris for 13 years, including 5 years in Méréville (Essonne, French 91st Department), meaning that I am not only accustomed with French Traditions, but took part regularly in many festivities, religious and non religious both in Paris and in the country-side. The Christian Feast of the Epiphany is one of them, and on that occasion a Cake of or for the Kings "La Galette des Rois", a flat almond pastry cake is shared among the guests to celebrate the coming and incarnation (God made man) of Jesus Christ. Traditionally Epiphany is on 6th January and is celebrated on the 1st Sunday of January because it is not a public holiday. NOW, my questions are: 1. How on earth would Jewish (Israel, Libération, Rothschild, etc.) financed and supported pornographers celebrate Christian Epiphany or even "La Galette des Rois"? 2. How could the pornographers even celebrate the famous "Galette des Rois" NOT on Sunday 4th like everybody else, but on Wednesday 7th of January 2015! 3. Can anybody find out who else celebrated Epiphany or "La Galette des Rois" on Wednesday 7th of January 2015? 4. Can anybody investigate how many times in previous years did those pornographers celebrate "La Galette des Rois" and on which dates? Dr Kevin Barrett has done an excellent job regarding this "Charlie Hebdo" matter and he should always be remembered for his courageous and unflinching Jihad for Truth in so many other matters! Regards BasheerMonday 15th of June 2015