Pioneer Internet Has a Monopoly & is Rationing Internet Access

Originally posted by Sublime620
And this is where the real problem comes into play. DSL cannot guarantee 1.5Mb/s, but that is mostly due to packet loss and distance from CO - not
from the company not having enough bandwidth for the end user. That is simply unacceptable.

Nobody is arguing that Pioneer Internet is delivering a perfect product. Clearly they have technical issues. That has been determined.

What makes this fodder for a "General Conspiracy" forum? Someone is offering a service with less than stellar performance; and sticking it to ya'.
What's new?

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
and the provider is denying any bandwidth throttling. The problem of ISP bandwidth throttling is rampant, and getting worse... and some of it
involves domain-specific throttling. If this continues, and ISP's are allowed to control network traffic, one day Comcast could decide not to deliver
abovetopsecret.com because we have a thread critical of them.

Hate to disagree SO, but Valhall's post clearly states the ISP and AT&T are denying "responsibility", and therefore tacitly agreeing there is a
problem. Additionally, Valhall's post clearly says nothing about domain-specific throttling.....and is not limited to Internet access or 'Net
neutrality. Apparently, prime time television programming is given a higher QoS somewhere upstream. That's it....a complaint about bad service.

Hate to disagree SO, but Valhall's post clearly states the ISP and AT&T are denying "responsibility", and therefore tacitly agreeing there is a
problem. Additionally, Valhall's post clearly says nothing about domain-specific throttling.....and is not limited to Internet access or 'Net
neutrality. Apparently, prime time television programming is given a higher QoS somewhere upstream. That's it....a complaint about bad service.

Oh no - don't put words in my mouth simply because I didn't say it. Let's get straight. AT&T hasn't denied anything (and that's assuming AT&T
is, in fact, the Level 3). I have one place I can point to right now simply because they refuse to give the name to the next level up - that's
Pioneer.

Do I think the problem is above them? Do I believe the Pioneer domain is being throttled at a point upstream to Pioneer?

Yes I do.

Do I know if it is Pioneer allowing that by being cheap? or is it the Level 3 (AT&T) being the point of throttling and has Pioneer by the
short-hairs?

You yourself have shown a tendency to view my area of lesser importance with your farm-house comments and your subtle insinuations that we ought to
all feel lucky we even have electricity.

I DO believe there is throttling that has led to the TV datastream priority choking back the former free-flow of DSL internet. It is no longer
free-flow - it is queing big time in a very restricted bandwidth now. I do not know who to blame yet. I have to blame Pioneer at this point since
they have, by refusing to provide the Level 3 name, decided they want to be blamed.

By the way - so that you understand the situation here. Pioneer is a cooperative! So the "capitalist" nature in which they are operating right now
isn't okie-dokie. So, for all intents and purposes I should be able to call and ask any and all questions about who is providing what and what level
of switching is being used and whether the Peering is working out. I am not being given answers so this "cooperative" is not running in a public
manner, it is running in an extremely secretive manner. For 90% of the TV-watching customers they have when we get a month free service for the year
some time around June because the cooperative did so damned good they saved us all a month of service all those folks will sit down and watch TV with
a bigger smile on their faces.

For those of us who have had services taken away from us that we are still paying for and can't get answers to track down what's really going on -
we won't have the same smile. YES - I believe some one upstream of Pioneer is either refusing services to the domain OR asking a price that the
cooperative didn't expect or can't pay or didn't prepare for.

Oh, it's even more confusing than that....Pioneer Telephone Cooperative. Yup, it's a coop.....now how do we define it?

*I see Valhall has already mentioned this*

Valhall,
Either they are negatively impacting the bandwidth to the entire Internet, as you implied, or they are throttling Pioneer's domain. That's
confusing. Pioneer's domain should have no impact on your ability to connect to other domains such as cnn.com...msnbc.com....or connect to gaming
sites.

Your initial post claimed all Internet activity was negatively impacted. I still don't see any attempt to throttle specific content or
domains.

If your routed through Dallas (Actually Irving, but see why it would be mistaken for Dallas), I pretty much can say its not AT&T's end that is the
problem. Might be bottlenecked by AT&T due to your ISP not getting enough bandwidth from AT&T though.

I've been trying to determine where Pioneer gets its IPTV signal. Has it been determined they get it from AT&T? Or are they pulling it from a
satellite and delivering it themselves? I ask 'cause the sure did buy a lot of fancy equipment for this launch.

Apparently this is some kind of nifty thingy they pulled off where they are inserting local advertising into the digital TV channels even when they
are cable networks and such.

""ETI's VideoDirect provides a powerful platform that enables us to run local content on major networks while providing powerful billing and
tracking features."

ETI's VideoDirect 6000 platform works in conjunction with networks deploying either analog or digital program insertion or a combination of both. It
uses the same architecture for local or network endpoint applications, using its own host server or standard Video-on-Demand Servers for ad storage
and streaming. Interfaces between ETI's ad server and the Video Splicer are SCTE compliant. "

I am a high speed internet tech for a big company in a northern community of about 200000 people. For years we had the monopoly out here but we have
been faced with competition for several years now. Our company will not offer anything faster than 7 MB DSL while all third party providers in the
same area offer 10 - 18 MB DSL using the equipment in OUR frames. Its a damn crime i tell you.

The company says that Pioneer Telephone, which claims to be the fourth-largest telephone cooperative in the US, has launched its DotDaily localized
interactive TV service. The service is now providing localized news and information to IPTV subscribers served by 72 exchanges in Oklahoma. It
features news and sports coverage from the Associated Press, local weather info from AccuWeather, local movie guides, horoscopes, and local content
(including community events calendars, school lunch menus and community slide shows) published by community organizations via CloverLeaf’s DashDaily
tools. "CloverLeaf’s localized walled garden contributes to our efforts to provide our customers with content and functionality that they can’t
get from cable or satellite," Pioneer’s video business manager, Scott Ulsaker, said in a prepared statement. "CloverLeaf was able to localize
their service for every exchange on our network, and we already have several community organizations creating local content with the community content
publishing tools."
The company has signed a deal with Digeo to provide walled-garden information services to the latter’s Moxi platform (see article in this issue).

i dunno what relevance this may be but, in my part of canada they have started to impose bandwidth limits, rogers and bell this year

40 gigs a month for bell i think, and 95 for rogers upload and download

maybe this is just them getting more money for all the torrent use i dunno but when i saw "rationing" i thought i'd tell ya'll that both internet
providers here have imposed bandwidths in the last 2-3 monthes no matter what service you have with them (dial-up to the ultra high speed) with the
higher speeds you'd pay more but you never used to have a bandwidth limit

looking at the stuff i get in the mail it from rogers and bell it doesn't seem like you can pay for a service without a bandwidth limit any longer

so in respect to rationing they have put something in place to stop you from downloading too much, unless you want to pay the w/e it is for each extra
gig

i know bandwidth limits aren't new, but up until i think feb or march of 2008 you could get an unlimited bandwidth connection for a reasonable price,
maybe it's the downloading, maybe it's them trying to save on bandwidth for the TV users before they have a problem in the first place?

i know that torrents, streaming videos and a few other things have been picking up in the last few years that are heavier on bandwidth than the old
ways of the internet and maybe it's just business

but maybe it's a coming change in the internet? less internet? who saw the last south park episode? "rations" of the internet were being given out
at camps lol it was treated like scraps of water or food during a "depression"

(in canada bell owns all telephone lines, and rogers all cable lines, monopolies all the way)

Let's face it...the place where bandwidth rationing or even a dearth of bandwidth availability hurts the worst is any P2P activity. I just got
through reading an interesting study these guys did on whether P2P packets can be checked and passed without loss. An interesting thing was that they
had to disguise the P2P by moving to a different port so that the "P2P'ness" of it would not be detected and handled differently.

???

So are we seeing a move to try to quash P2P activity so that the bandwidth can be available for less user-directed activities? i.e. - for what the
provider wants to use it for instead of what the user wants to use it for? Are they going to turn our internet tubes on us so they can dumb them down
and spew stuff at us instead of us using them for what we want?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.