I am a Protestant, white, Anglo-Saxon nativist --- according to Carlos
Romero-Barceló, Puerto Rico's non-voting delegate in
Congress. This will come as news to my rabbi.

Would Romero-Barceló allow me to be a Jewish, white,
Anglo-Saxon nativist -- if I promise not to burn a bagel on his lawn?

In an April 28 speech on the House floor, Romero-Barceló indicted opposition to the
Puerto Rican statehood referendum bill, which passed the House by a single vote in
March. If enacted, the measure would allow a bare majority of the island's voters to set
it on the road to statehood.

The closeness of the vote, Romero-Barceló confided, was due to prejudice and
paranoia: "In the nativist mindset, the 3.8 million American citizens of Puerto Rico do
not belong in this union because they do not walk, talk and look like the nativist of the
hour."

And who are these know-nothings? "In the mid-1800s, a nativist was a Protestant,
white, Anglo-Saxon male. ... Perhaps the profile of a nativist today is the same,"
Romero-Barcelo speculates.

He then names me as a nattering nabob of nativism.

"Just listen to what nativists say will happen if Puerto Rico becomes a state," the
congressman urges. He quotes my April 5 column, "'Granting statehood to a land that
is alien to us in most ways,' declares Don Feder of the Boston Herald, 'will be a
milestone on the road to national dissolution."'

Those are my words -- and I'm grateful to have them read into the Congressional
Record.

Regrettably, Romero-Barceló overlooked a few other notorious Anglo-Saxons opposed
to Puerto Rican statehood: Jorge Amselle (of the Center for Equal Opportunity), Mauro
E. Mujica (chairman of U.S. English) and Linda Chavez, (former staff director of the
U.S. Civil Rights Commission).

"Making Puerto Rico a state not only is a monumentally bad idea, but undermines
everything the Republican Congress has sought to do," writes Amselle (AKA: Reginald
Van Cleese III?) in National Review.

Chavez charges that statehood "could cost billions in increased federal aid and
permanently alter the culture of the United States." Apparently, Anglo-Saxon,
Protestants aren't the only ones who care about cultural continuity.

Mujica's organization has produced a well-documented, 20-page white paper --
"Avoiding an American Quebec: The Future of Puerto Rico and the United States."

In his 1978 book, Statehood Is for the Poor, Romero-Barceló gave away the game
when he argued that the change would entitle the island to an additional $3 billion
annually in public assistance, due to its poverty (half of all families earn less than
$10,000 a year) and unemployment. Give us your teeming masses, yearning to suck up
welfare.

But economics is the least of our nativist concerns.

Over 80 percent of Puerto Ricans don't speak English. Spanish would be the new
state's official language, de facto or de jure. This would put America on the slippery
slope to becoming a bilingual nation (eliminating the one factor that's united our diverse
people). Hispanic activists have pushed bilingualism for years, especially in states with
large Latino populations.

Puerto Ricans have a distinct language, culture and national identity, all of which makes
them unlikely candidates for assimilation and Americanization -- two things us
country-club types prize greatly.

In a 1997 poll conducted by American Viewpoint Inc., residents of the island were
asked, "Do you consider yourself to be Puerto Rican or American?" "American," said
16 percent. "Both," answered 18 percent. An overwhelming 65 percent said they
thought of themselves exclusively as Puerto Rican.

Quebec isn't the only model for the new state. The island has a small, but passionate
independence movement. Some of the groups pushing nationhood tap into a terrorist
tradition dating back to the 1950s, when independence-seekers ventilated five
congressmen in the very chamber where Romero-Barceló spoke.

In 1990, would-be revolutionary Carlos Ayes told The New York Times: "Statehood will
mean war. If the United States wants its very own Northern Ireland, let them continue
this farce."

Poverty, language barriers, cultural separatism and nationalism are volatile matters that
can't be avoided by name-calling. I challenge Romero-Barceló to a debate on Puerto
Rican statehood, at a neutral forum of his choice. This presupposes that he's capable
of discussing the subject without using words like "white," "Protestant," "Anglo-Saxon"
or "nativist" -- at best, a dubious
assumption.

4/29/98:
Needle exchange programs are assisted-suicide
4/27/98: Chretien's mission of mercy to Fidel 4/22/98: School-choice is a religious freedom issue4/20/98: Corporate execs deliver body parts to Beijing4/14/98: National sales tax --- looks better all the time
4/13/98: The U.N. sinister? Hey, where did that idea come from?
4/8/98: Unions fight workers rights in 226 campaign3/30/98: Africa's leaders should apologize3/25/98: GOP shouldn't look to media for advice3/22/98: You should care about Clinton's 'private life'3/19/98: Color-coded reading, product of obsessive minds3/16/98: Amendment will end exile of G-d from our public lives3/9/98: Havana will break your heart3/2/98: Vouchers Terrify Teachers' Union2/25/98: Presidential politics starts at a resort hotel2/23/98: Hillary's support comes at a price2/18/98: How many times must we say "no" to gay rights?2/16/98: Enoch Powell spoke the truth on immigration2/11/98: Bubba behaving badly2/9/98: A conservative dissent on the flag-burning amendment2/5/98: We get the leaders we deserve2/2/98: Send a signal that could penetrate boardroom doors1/27/98: State of the president: hollow rhetoric1/25/98: For Monica's playmate, we have no one to blame but ourselves1/22/98: At Yale, bet on yarmulke over gown1/19/98: Commission tackles America's fastest-growing addiction, gambling
1/15/98: Capital punishment and the hard case: no exceptions for Karla Faye Tucker
1/12/98: Partial-birth abortion and the GOP's future: the "big tent" meets truth in advertising
1/8/98: IOLTA: the Left's latest scam to crawl into our pockets
1/5/98: Connect the dots to create a terrorist state1/1/98: The Unacceptables of 1997: Long may they rave12/28/97: Hypocrisy is a liberal survival mechanism12/23/97: Chanukah is no laughing matter12/22/97: No merry Christmas for persecuted Christians around the world12/18/97: Bosnia, Haiti, and how not to conduct a foreign policy