harmony-dev mailing list archives

The DaCapo benchmarks were designed specifically with GC in mind, and
are (in my opinion at least) more representative of current GC workloads
than the SPEC benchmarks.
http://dacapobench.org/
cheers
Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Hi Lyon,
>
> You might consider use the microbenchmark that specifically stresses
> GC. This little one [1] I wrote for my GC performance tuning [2].
>
> Thanks,
> Aleksey.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12368829/GCTest.java
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5058
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Xiao-Feng Li <xiaofeng.li@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We usually just use SPEC benchmarks. You can try DaCapo from UMass.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> xiaofeng
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:36 PM, lyon <ustcliao@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > hi all
>> > I intend to test the performance of my implement on the gc,and I try to
>> > compare with
>> > performance of original algorithm that is based on the SPECjbb.But I
>> > found that the SPECjbb is not free,
>> > what other benchmarks are available?
>> > thanks
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
>>
>>