Date: Aug 18, 2006 11:18 AM
Author: emailtgs@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Induction proof
Paul Sperry, thank you for your reply, however you're attempting tosolve a different problem here. It seems that you've introducted thenumber 1 to the problem as the first term in the series. I'm not surewhy you did this and again, the problem is proof by (induction).