After voting overwhelmingly Democratic in the midterm elections, California is about to get even more blue. Democrats control the executive branch, have a huge majority in the Legislature and for the first time in decades will have a numerical edge on the state’s Supreme Court: The expected confirmation this month of Joshua Groban, an adviser to Gov. Jerry Brown, will result in a court of four Democratic-appointed justices and three Republican-appointed ones.

If it were Washington, pundits would declare a political hat trick. The fact that it’s not Washington was made clear on Tuesday in the annual state-of-the-judiciary briefing held by Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye.

The chief justice is a Republican who was appointed by then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Yet she described the 600 court appointments that Governor Brown has made during his two terms as “fantastic.” She praised the state Supreme Court’s consensus-based approach and said she doubted that the court would be much different with a majority of Democratic-appointed justices.

“I think all of us value the fact that there can be no resolution without courtesy and civility and humor,” she said.

In her remarks, Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, 59, spoke about a new generation of judges who embodied what she described as California values — judges who cared about homelessness, climate change and “what are we going to do about guns.”

She defined the California ethos as “underdog centric” and criticized the federal immigration authorities for making arrests in courthouses. It almost sounded like a Gavin Newsom stump speech.

David A. Carrillo, executive director of the California Constitution Center at Berkeley Law, said he was not surprised at the chief justice’s comments and her emphasis on consensus. In a study due to be published this month, Dr. Carrillo analyzed 302 opinions by the state Supreme Court over the past three years and found only one in which the justices appointed by Mr. Brown voted as a distinct bloc against the other justices.

“People ask this question all the time, ‘Why is California not polarized?’ We are divided as a nation but not so much as a state,” Dr. Carrillo said. “I think it’s particularly telling that we have a state high court that reflects that consensus.”

California Online

(Please note: We regularly highlight articles on news sites that have limited access for nonsubscribers.)

Image

Nancy Pelosi, the leader of House Democrats, and President Trump during their meeting in the Oval Office on Tuesday.CreditDoug Mills/The New York Times

• “It’s like a manhood thing with him — as if manhood can be associated with him. This wall thing.” Representative Nancy Pelosi had some choice words for President Trump after a televised Oval Office fight over a looming government shutdown. [The New York Times]

• A Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputy is being charged with voluntary manslaughter in the shooting death of an unarmed man at a Norwalk Gas station in 2016. It’s the first time since 2000 that a law enforcement officer in L.A. County has been prosecuted for an on-duty shooting. [The Los Angeles Times]

• On Tuesday, the House Judiciary Committee had the chance to question one of the most powerful people on the planet: Google’s chief executive, Sundar Pichai. Many were not impressed by the performance by lawmakers. [Wired]

• Camp Fire victims sued Pacific Gas and Electric Co. in a pair of suits filed this week alleging that the utility misled the public about its efforts to maintain its equipment in a way that helps prevent wildfires. [The San Francisco Chronicle]

• The Lakers owner Jerry Buss introduced dancers to transform games into “showtime.” Decades later, women who have danced for the N.B.A., a pro sports league known as one with more progressive politics, say they’ve been subjected to body-shaming and meager pay. [Yahoo Lifestyle]

Image

The N.F.L. commissioner, Roger Goodell, at the Oakland Coliseum in 2012.CreditEzra Shaw/Getty Images

• Oakland filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against the Raiders and the N.F.L. on Tuesday. City leaders hope the move could net millions in damages and pay off debt remaining from renovations at the Coliseum. It could also send the Raiders packing early for Las Vegas. [The East Bay Times]