Only a conspiracy nut would have a problem with the President disarming Americans while bypassing Congress and creating a massive, heavily armed para-military which are being trained to shoot pregnant American women and children.

As Dr. Benjamin Carson pointed out, people are trained not to talk – as their country is being fundamentally transformed.

So don’t be a conspiracy nut, and keep your mouth closed. There is nothing to see here, move along.

True or false? The governments, both Federal and State, are now putting forth proposal after proposal to take guns. Some states are talking bans, confiscation, house-to-house searches. Is this enough evidence that the government is coming to take your guns? No? Let’s see now…

They’re coming to take the AR-15 and AK-47. AR-15 and AK-47 are guns. So they are coming to take guns. Just because certain guns will remain untaken does not alter this fact. Therefore, the statement “the government is not coming to take your guns” is false. They are coming to take someone’s guns.

The countdown is getting short. Not long now and there will be a full scale revolt. This is not going to end well for those currently in positions of power. Once the twig naps, the backlash is going to be of EPIC proportions when the largest “real” military in the world (the American people) become unhinged and vent a tremendous amount of pent up frustration and anger. If I were a politician, I would quickly, fervently and very publicly aligning myself with the 2nd Amendment and pray that I am not confused for being an anti-guns advocate or a politician with a lot of failed promises. This is going to be a very quick and bloody revolt. 7,000 guns and 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition aren’t going to be anywhere near enough for their protection.

“In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama’s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban “conspiracy theorizing.”

Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.

Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate “extremists who supply conspiracy theories” to disrupt the efforts of the “extremists” to propagate their theories.

In a 2008 Harvard law paper, “Conspiracy Theories,” Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, “What can government do about conspiracy theories?”

“We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.

Sunstein said government agents “might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.”

Sunstein defined a conspiracy theory as “an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role.”

Some “conspiracy theories” recommended for ban by Sunstein include:

* “The theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.”
* “The view that the Central Intelligence Agency was responsible for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.”
* “The 1996 crash of TWA flight 800 was caused by a U.S. military missile.”
* “The Trilateral Commission is responsible for important movements of the international economy.”
* “That Martin Luther King Jr. was killed by federal agents.”
* “The moon landing was staged and never actually occurred.”

Sunstein allowed that “some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true.”