We released a comprehensive new report on the Panama FTA. Here's our press release:

President Obama's ability to deliver on his campaign commitments to
close tax loopholes that promote offshoring and re-regulate the
financial sector would be dealt a sharp blow if the U.S.-Panama Free
Trade Agreement (FTA) is passed, according to a Public Citizen report released today (PDF).

The new report details how Panama explicitly created an industrial
policy designed to create a "comparative advantage" in tax-evasion and
money-laundering services for entities such as the bailed-out American
International Group (AIG) and Mexican and Colombian narcotraffickers.
The report also examines how specific FTA rules would remove key policy
tools – such as limitations on transfers from tax-haven countries that
are used to combat financial crimes – and would also conflict with U.S.
government efforts to combat the global economic crisis by
re-regulating finance.

"Members of Congress wouldn't vote to let AIG not pay its taxes or
to give Mexican drug lords a safe place to hide their proceeds from
selling drugs to our kids, but that's in essence what the Panama FTA
does," said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade
Watch division. "The Obama administration has discarded or altered many
leftover Bush initiatives, so why would it push a Bush trade pact that
directly conflicts with its priority campaign goals of closing tax
loopholes and regulating finance?"

The Panama deal, negotiated by the Bush administration, is modeled on
the controversial North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) template.
It includes the controversial private “investor-state” enforcement
system, which would give new powers to hundreds of thousands of private
investors from around the world that are registered and have operations
in Panama. This includes the right to challenge U.S. anti-tax haven
policies and financial service regulations in foreign tribunals to
demand taxpayer-funded compensation.

Among the key findings:

Some of the largest recipients of U.S. federal procurement contracts and money under the Troubled Asset Relief Program – including Citigroup and AIG – have a combined dozens of subsidiaries in Panama that would be empowered with expansive new rights if the FTA is implemented. These firms have been among the top advocates for the Panama FTA;

Panama is one of only 13 countries – and the only current or prospective FTA partner – that is listed on all of the major tax-haven watchdog lists that also does not have U.S. tax transparency treaties.

In the face of recent pressure to reform related to the G-20 Financial Crisis summit process, Panama wrote to the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) defiantly outlining its refusal to adopt key reforms, such as lifting the veil of secrecy on beneficial ownership of bank accounts and automatic exchange of tax information;

The April 2009 OECD tax-haven watch-list includes Panama among 30 countries that agreed to conform to international tax norms but failed to do so. Indeed, the OECD report notes that Panama made its commitment in 2002 and since has completed not a single agreement to implement its promise. In contrast, other countries on the list have completed as many as eight compliance agreements – which is still not adequate to be taken off this list.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice and other entities, Panama is also a major financial conduit for Mexican and Colombian narcotraffickers’ money laundering activities;

According to the U.S. State Department, Panama has more than 350,000 foreign-registered companies, all of which face low to no taxes and regulation. This high rate of foreign incorporation – Panama is reportedly second only to Hong Kong – makes the country a magnet for tax evasion. According to a Panamanian law firm’s advertisement touting Panama’s lax standards: “Even Switzerland cooperates on income tax cases if the return is filed falsely like all income was not declared, things were omitted or so the complaining government says. Belize has tax treaties, as do most of the so-called ‘tax havens.’ There is no better jurisdiction than Panama today!!!!!!!”

“At a time of massive public anger at Wall Street, the Panama FTA is the wrong handout for the wrong interests,” said Todd Tucker, research director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch division. “President Obama campaigned on the need for a change in our trade policies and a crack-down on tax loopholes that promote offshoring, so implementing a Bush NAFTA-style trade agreement with one of the world’s major tax havens is pretty obviously not the way to go.”

To remedy the tax-haven, banking-secrecy and money-laundering problems with the FTA outlined in this report, the Obama administration should renegotiate the pact to:

Eliminate the FTA provisions that ban limits on transfers, which would remove from the United States the key policy tool for acting against banking secrecy, tax-haven policies and money laundering;

Remove the investor-state enforcement system, which would allow hundreds of thousands of private investors from around the world that are registered and have operations in Panama to challenge U.S. anti-tax haven policies for cash compensation;

Remove the FTA’s restrictions on financial regulations, including those that forbid limits on financial service firms’ size or establishment of firewalls between different financial service businesses, and add to FTA’s financial services text a set of required minimum financial regulatory standards that signatories to the agreement would agree to adopt in domestic law and enforce that could be based on the re-regulation proposals now being formulated in multilateral and domestic forums; and

Require that the FTA be terminated if Panama fails to maintain the transparency standards outlined below, which should be passed before the FTA goes into effect. (As a related measure, the Obama administration should create an independent regulatory agency, perhaps along the lines of the Financial Product Safety Commission proposed by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and others, and authorize this body to perform regular evaluations of Panama's maintenance of these new standards. These evaluations would form the basis for the invocation of the FTA termination measure.)

The report additionally outlines a series of steps Panama must take domestically before any FTA with the country should even be considered. Among the top reforms are signing an automatic tax information exchange agreement with the United States, full disclosure of the beneficial ownership of corporations and other entities, and a ban on bearer shares (securities that allow the holder to conceal their identity).

“This agreement is a throwback to a past era, as highlighted by the agreement’s expansive limits on financial service regulation. The pact was signed by President Bush in 2007 and clearly predates the bipartisan consensus created by the meltdown that better regulation of financial service is necessary for markets to work productively,” said Wallach.

Comments

Todd - in answer to your query about Canada: this is posted underneath the TJN blog

The regulations under section 6049 of the US Internal Revenue Code (Regulation 1.6049.8 and 1.6049-4 and 1.6049.6) provide that if a bank in the United States accepts a deposit from an individual who is resident in Canada, the bank in the United States must inform the US Internal Revenue Service "IRS") . The IRS provides that information automatically to the Canadian Government. There is no TIEA between the United States and Canada, but there is a comprehensive double taxation agreement with an exchange of information clause.

Post a comment

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Name is required to post a comment

Please enter a valid email address

Invalid URL

Please enable JavaScript if you would like to comment on this blog.

About Us

Eyes on Trade is a blog by the staff of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch (GTW) division. GTW aims to promote democracy by challenging corporate globalization, arguing that the current globalization model is neither a random inevitability nor "free trade." Eyes on Trade is a space for interested parties to share information about globalization and trade issues, and in particular for us to share our watchdogging insights with you! GTW director Lori Wallach's initial post explains it all.

Author Bios

Contact

Public Citizen Blogs

Citizen VoxPublic Citizen's main blog curated by its staff from the Congress Watch, Energy, and Health Research divisions.

Consumer Law & PolicyA diverse group of lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy.

Texas VoxA blog by the staff of Public Citizen’s Texas office focusing on ways to lower electric bills, increase clean and renewable sources of energy and combat greenhouse gas emissions, which are responsible for global climate change.