Posts Tagged ‘Rotherham’

An honor killing is the murder of a person accused of ‘bringing shame’ on their family or community. Although men can fall victim, most honor killings involve women and girls. The barbarity is unthinkable as most victims are often killed by their own family members, namely parent(s) and male sibling(s). Victims are often murdered for the following reasons: a. Talking to an unrelated male b. Rejecting a marriage partner chosen by family members c. Committing or being accused of adultery d. Becoming pregnant out of wedlock e. Not dressing conservatively enough f. Being a victim of rape (!?). Yes, being raped by some perpetrator(s) then being murdered by family member(s) for it! Ironically, murderers actually get reduced sentences in cases when honor is the motivation. When a murderer is convicted of an honor killing, often they receive no more than two years jail in non-Western countries. According to the United Nations, about 5,000 women are murdered by family members in honor killings every year.

Besides stoning, stabbing, beheading and shooting, burying the victim alive is also a popular method of “Honor” killing in Islamic countries for the immoral and/or mentally challenged followers of the Islamic death cult.

1) USA

A recent study by the U.S. Justice Department quoted research that estimates between 23 and 27 honor killings occur each year in the United States and there are 1,500 forced marriages. Gelareh Bagherzadeh, 30, Iranian activist and researcher, from Houston, TX, was shot to death by Ali Irsan with the helps of his wife, Shmou Ali Alrawabdeh, and their 21-year-old son, Nasim, for helping his daughter to marry a Christian man. Sandeela Kanwal, 25, from Atlanta, GA, was strangled to death by her father, Chaudhry Rashid, Pakistan-born, with a bungee cord, for wanting a divorce. Amina Said, 18, and her sister Sarah, 17, both from Dallas, TX, were shot 11 times by their father, Yaser Abdel Said, Egypt-born, and abandoned in a hotel (Omni Mandalay Hotel) parking lot, for having non-Muslim boyfriends. “Honor”-killing of Amina Said. Aasiya Zubair Hassan, 37, from New York City, was stabbed and beheaded by her husband, Muzzammil Hassan, the Pakistan-born founder and owner of Bridges TV, for divorcing him. Noor Almaleki, 20, in a Phoenix valley, AZ, was run over and killed by her father, Faleh Hassan Almaleki, Iraqi-born, for being “too Westernized“. Abbas’ father and sister, 21, were shot and killed in their village, by Mohammad Ajmal Choudhry, a Pakistan-born New York City cab driver, for helping his daughter to get away from forced marriage. Palestina (Tina) Isa, 16, from St. Louis, MO, was stabbed and killed by her parents, Zein and Maria Isa, Palestine-born, for dating a non-Muslim boy. Shaima Alawadi, 32, mother of 5, was beaten to death with a car iron by her husband, Iraq-born, for wanting a divorce. Fauzia A. Mohammad, 19, from Henrietta, N.Y., was stabbed and killed by her brother, for immodest dressing. Hatice Peltek, 39, from Scottsville, N.Y., was stabbed and killed by her husband, Ismail Peltek, Turkey-born, for being raped, along with her daughter, by his brother (!?) Dr. Lubaina Bhatti Ahmed, from St. Clairsville, Ohio, along with her father and child, were stabbed and killed by her husband, for wanting a divorce. Marlyn Hassan, 29, late in pregnancy with twins, from Jersey City, NJ, along with her mother and sister, were stabbed and killed by her husband, Alim Hassan, a Guyanese Muslim, for refusing to convert from Hinduism to Islam.

2. UK

There are now more than 100 Sharia Courts in U.K. officially legalize “Honor”-killings. And yes, U.K. has fallen to Muslim invaders! The land of Sir. Isaac Newton and Winston Churchill has quickly been reduced to “NO-GO” zones, terror slumps, and jihadi centers (aka mosques) in just a few decades. Laura Wilson, 17, from Rotherham, South Yorkshire, was stabbed and killed. She became the first white victim of honor killing in UK Banaz Mahmod, 20, was strangled by her father and uncle just hours before she was buried in a Birmingham garden, for divorcing her first husband from an arranged marriage and falling in love with another man. Her cousin who helped burying her body was “still proud of what he did”, according to the judge.

“Honor”-killings of all females of the whole family Zainab Shafia, 19, Sahar Shafia, 17, and Geeti Shafia, 13, Rona Amir Mohammad, 52. Aqsa Parvez, 16, from Toronto, was strangled and killed by her father, Muhammad Parvez and brother, Waqas Parvez, both Pakistan-born, for refusing to wear a hijab and running away from home. Shahdady, from Toronto, was strangled and killed by her husband Abdul Malik Rustam, Pakistan-born, in a burqa, for wanting a divorce.

4. Pakistan

%83 of Pakistanis support stoning for adultery, and only 8 percent oppose it. %40 of Pakistanis support honor-killings for premarital sex Sajjad Ahmed, 26, and Muawia Bibi, 18, were decapitated by the bride’s family, for refusing a forced marriage. Saba Masqood, 18, was shot and left for dead inside of a sack in a canal by her brother, for refusing a forced marriage. Pregnant Farzana Parveen, 25, was killed with bricks, outside a court building, by a group of 20 people, including her relatives and immediate family members, for refusing a forced marriage and instead romancing her future husband Mohammad Iqbal who had killed his first wife 6 years ago so he could (re)marry Parveen. Although the issue of honor killings is mostly associated with women, %33 of Pakistanis said that honor killings of men can be often (%23) or sometimes justified (%10).

Honor Killings

Uzbekistan showed the largest gap (-%14) of Muslims disapproving of women (%60) committed honor killings versus those committed by men (%46). In other words, the Muslims here were misogynistic even in judging criminal, murdering acts perpetrated by, not on, women. Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, and Afghanistan earned the less than exemplary distinction of being the countries with the smallest percentages of Muslims disapproving honor-killings (averagely %47, %36, %28, %24, respectively), or with the largest percentages of Muslims approving honor-killings, (averagely %53, %64, %72, %76, respectively).Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, and Lebanon interestingly showed the largest gaps (averagely %47, %11, %10, and %10, respectively) of Muslims disapproving honor-killings committed by Muslim men versus those committed by Muslim women, with more disapproval toward those committed by Muslim men (!?). For example, %81 Jordanians disapproved honor killings committed by men, but only %34 Jordanians disapproved those committed by women. Taqiyya/kitman were involved?

5. Afghanistan

19-year-old Muslim girl named Rokhshana from Firozkoh, stoned to death for refusing a forced marriage, Ghor Province, Afghanistan, Nov 3rd, 2015. 10 year old girl was raped (and slated for honor killing) by a mullah, 45 Amina, 18, from Baghlan Province, was shot to death by her family, for running from home and refusing a forced marriage

6. Syria

Fayyez stabbed his sister five times in the head and back while she was sleeping, shattering the base of her skull and nearly severing her spinal column.

7. Iran

Women are chattel (properties), lower than cattle, and NOT human, under Sharia Law.

8. Conclusion:

Muslims are indeed developmentally, morally, and behaviorally lower than animals, because most animals do NOT usually slaughter their own mates or offspring as Muslims routinely do in “Honor” killings. Whether this is due to the negative effect of innate factor like inbreeding or environmental factor like drinking camel urine, it has yet been determined.

It’s a common Muslim strategy to play the race card to seek false legitimacy and elicit white guilt in order to get concessions and special treatments before conquering their lands and put everyone, including non-Muslims, under Shariah Law.To Muslims, correct word usage is irrelevant as long as the slogan achieves its intended political purpose. It’s part of Muslim deception technique “taqiyya/kitman“.

1. Race card is just that, a subterfuge, a gimmick, using race as an excuse

For example, the Muslim imam in the video accused the reporter of being ‘racist’ (before violently punching him in the face) despite the fact that his co-reporter/driver was a Chinese/Asian.

Another example is a Muslim woman in Australia accused a traffic policeman of being ‘racist’ after being pulled over, then sued him with fabrications as evidences after being ticketed, then committed perjuries profusely afterwards, including lying that she was not the one behind the burqa at the scene (hence, all the more reasons to ban Muslim burqa as a safety and security hazard, no?). Crying Allah, after her scheme was despicably exposed by the policeman cruiser’s captured video, she was sentenced to 6 months in prison by the judge. Her Muslim lawyer started requesting for leniency with the reason that she was a mother of 7 kids (hence, all the more reasons to curtail Muslim immigration AND limit their explosive birthrate, no?), despite the fact that her family size was common among Muslims, and that having a big family as a norm was no excuse to commit crimes nor to receive leniency as a result. Last but not least, as vile and obnoxious as the manner she slandered the authoritative figure of the law, the way she paced the ground in her perennial black Halloween costume was just comically insidious and vicious, much resembled a grumpy, rotund witch, likely ugly not just from the outside and apparently not just from the appearance.

2. Muslim is NOT a race

The followers of the Islamic cult are of all colors, races, nationalities, and ethnic groups. Indeed,blacks from North Africa (countries like Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco) and North America (USA, Canada); browns, both Arabs and non-Arabs, from Middle East (Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Syria, Jordan), Central Asia (Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan), South Asia (Bangladesh, Pakistan, India), South East Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia); whites as converts in Muslim countries and natives from Bosnia, Kazakhstan, and Caucasus region (Russia), all have significant Muslim populations. In fact, all of the above countries, except India which has Hindu majority, belong to the 49 Muslim-majority countries in the world.

Below are dictionary definitions of ‘racism’.

American Heritage Dictionary: 1. “The belief that each race has distinct and intrinsic attributes.” or “The belief that one race is superior to all others.” 2. “Prejudice or discrimination based upon race.“

Merriam-Webster Dictionary: 1. “A belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race. Racial prejudice or discrimination.” 2. “a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race” 3. “racial prejudice or discrimination.“

Oxford Dictionary: 1. “The belief that there are characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to each race. Discrimination against or antagonism towards other races.” 2. “Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior” 3. “The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.”

It is quite obvious that none of the definitions for ‘racism’ above is having anything to do with, or even remotely related to, Islam or Muslim. In fact, none of the above even mentioned ‘cult’ (or ‘religion’), nor ‘Islam’, nor ‘Muslim’. The definitions clearly have ‘race’, not ‘cult’, nor ‘sect’, nor ‘denomination’, nor ‘religion’ or anything even remotely ‘religious’, as the word stem, Therefore, because it has been established that Muslim was not a race, calling anti-Muslim or anti-Islam sentiment racism is both descriptively and syntactically incorrect, and as logical as calling anti-Communist or anti-Communism sentiment racism, since followers of Communism are also composed of all colors, races, nationalities, and ethnic groups, namely whites in former Soviet Union and the former Eastern Bloc countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia); browns in China, North Korea, Vietnam; and blacks in Cuba and North Africa (Angola, Benin, Dem Rep. of Congo, Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, and Mozambique). As a result,using the Muslim race card is false and misleading at best, and downright defamatory or libeling at worst. In such cases, the term ‘racism’ is not only intentionally used in the wrong context, it is based on the wrong definitions to begin with.

3. Why do Muslims use the Muslim race card and not the Muslim religion card?

Though Islam has been a toxic death rape cult (and not a true world religion like other world religions), Muslims do NOT want the audience to immediately think of Muslim conducts and complaints in a religious and historical context and compare them against those of other religions. Indeed, what was the last time in modern world history one has witnessed widespread atrocities being committed, in the name of religion, with the same cruelty and frequency by Christians? by Buddhists? by Hindus? by Jews? by Sikh? What was the last time in modern world history one has heard complaints from any of the above religious groups in the West? The answers to both questions are the same, that they do not exist. On the other hand, racial tension and racial upheavals do happen in modern world history from time to time, and so do complaints from the civil right groups. Therefore, in order to manipulate the truth and avoid being quickly exposed, Muslims choose to use the Muslim race card instead of the Muslim religion card.

Last but not least, Muslims know that nothing short of a race issue will elicit unduly white guilt in the white audience, resentful emotions in the black audience, and blanket approvals by the traitorous liberal audience. Indeed, with Affirmative Action Programs having long been a significant part of American social institutions since 1960’s, as generous, self-conscious, and striving to be as much politically correct as possible, most Westerners were sensitive, and oversensitive in many cases, to race relation and race issue. In parallel, though having made great strides in racial equality since the days of Rosa Park and Martin Luther King to even have been electorally governed by a black President, a number of blacks still feel being mistreated, disfranchised, and feel equally sensitive and oversensitive, to race issue and accordingly to the word ‘racism’ or ‘racist’, specifically. Growing up in the environment full of untruths and being specifically taught to use lies, deceptions, and verbal manipulations (taqiyya/kitman) by their cult, the Muslims habitually use fabrications to accomplish their personal and political goals. In that context, using trickery, including verbal manipulations and various mislabeling strategies along with exploitation of political correctness, collective guilt, democracy and religious freedom offered in the West against their own citizens, “kafirs” (aka ‘kafars’), or non-believers, is in no exception and simply another tool in furthering the Muslims’ political agenda toward Islamization of the West, and ultimately global Islamization.

Using politics, terror, ‘taqiyya/kitman’, litigation, and their explosive birthrate basically enabled the Muslims to conquer countries in North Africa, former Christian country like Lebanon, and former Buddhist countries like Afghanistan, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Christian countries in the West are their next targets.

5. Muslim immigration or Hijrah

Muslim immigration or Hijrah is a means of replacing and supplanting, not assimilating, the native population. Even when Muslims show integration, it’s a FAKE gesture, only in appearance and only temporarily, until the goal of subduing and the complete Islamization of this host society is achieved, either directly via violent jihad or first through Civilization jihad (stealth jihad).