Русский

Россия

Казахстан

Армения

Азербайджан

Грузия

Киргизия

Таджикистан

Крым

Евразия

How to Listen

Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty broadcasts in 28 languages. Most of our programs are available on FM and medium-wave frequencies of local radio stations in the countries of our broadcast area. If you are having problems listening to programs on the internet, please read our technical help document.

TBILISI -- Don't you just hate it when you lend your car to someone and they return it with the gas tank empty and the floor mats all sticky with spilled soda?

Well this is how billionaire Bidzina Ivanishvili claims to have felt when the Georgian government returned his bank to him after allegedly taking it for a two-week, $50 million joyride.

Cartu Bank, which is part of the opposition figure's Cartu Group of holdings, was taken into government receivership on July 12 because Ivanishvili -- who heads the Georgian Dream movement that is seeking to oust President Mikheil Saakashvili from power -- refused to pay a $45 million fine for alleged political-funding violations.

When Ivanishvili paid the fine on July 25, Cartu Bank General Director Nodar Javakhishvili was able to return to his office. And he wasn't pleased with what he found.

"As soon as they arrived, the first thing they did was to launch negotiations with the European Bank [for Reconstruction and Development, EBRD]. We have an open line of credit with the EBRD, and they claimed they would cover these debts in advance," Javakhishvili says.

The bank director adds that this was "definitely not" in the bank's interests. "Draining the bank of its resources would make it possible for them to declare it insolvent and bring in a temporary administration," he notes. "Or to declare it bankrupt."

Financial 'Sword Of Damocles'

Economist Vladimer Ugulava, who was appointed by the government to manage the bank while it was in state hands, did not respond to repeated requests over two days to comment on this story.

Kakha Barabadze, head of the Public Relations Department of the National Bank of Georgia, also declined to comment.

The leader of Georgian Dream opposition coalition, Bidzina Ivanishvili, addresses supporters during a rally in the town of Mtskheta.

Javakhishvili also charges that the temporary managers signed loan agreements with four development companies, putting Cartu on the hook for $50 million.

"These agreements violate all laws, rules, and procedures of Georgian banking legislation, as well as international norms. We will not abide by them, most likely," he says.

"But this makes no difference -- I have no authority to annul them, only the courts can do that. And there is virtually no chance of this happening," Javakhishvili continues. "And if they are not annulled, then these obligations hang like a sword of Damocles over the bank. The National Bank will decide these obligations are real and will declare [Cartu] insolvent."

Javakhishvili claims that the temporary managers set themselves the task of destroying the bank, most likely as retaliation for Ivanishvili's political activity. He says the government has been waging "war" against the bank for months now and that Cartu has not won a single legal case against the state over the last nine months.

Political Gain, Economic Loss

In addition, despite having control of the bank for just two weeks, the temporary managers signed an 800,000-lari ($482,000) contract to renovate the bank's branch in the eastern Georgian city of Telavi. Javakhishvili says this is particularly strange because Cartu bought that building for just 500,000 laris. He believes the government's plan -- which was thwarted when Ivanishvili suddenly and unexpectedly agreed to pay his fine -- was to move Cartu's headquarters out of Tbilisi and sell off its opulent building in the capital.

Independent banking analyst Lia Eliava says the main responsibility of the temporary management should have been to maximize Cartu's profits in order to raise the money the government said Ivanishvili owed.

But, Eliava says, that isn't what happened, if Javakhishvili's claims are true. "The actions undertaken by the temporary administration cannot be considered as an intensification of banking operations or a means to maximize profits," the analyst says.

She notes that any bank's main capital is its reputation and that the state's campaign against Cartu has already cost the bank dearly, as growing numbers of creditors, clients, and other partners begin to shun it.

While the struggle against Cartu might be politically beneficial for the Saakashvili government, Eliava says it will certainly cast a shadow over the country's economy.

"The fight between the bank and the government has been going on for almost a year. Finally, as we can see, it looks like the government is winning and the bank is headed toward bankruptcy," Eliava says. "And this is not going to have a positive effect on the image of the country's banking sector."

You Might Also Like

Comments

by: potgeo from: GEO

August 01, 2012 04:01

"And this is not going to have a positive effect on the image of country's banking sector" -ditto!The absolute majority in the country lives in poverty, big and small business drained by government controlled financial police,unemployment is sky high, budget money has been already consumed - including emergency funds, justice system is tailored,... I can continue, list of the things which can have negative effect on country's image is pretty long. And, yes, Ivanishvili is a threat, huge threat actually, for Saakashvili and hisHopes to stay in power until the end of the days. So, what he does?Goes for jugular - money, money, money. Unfortunately for Saakashvili, Ivanishvili's strength is not the money (it does help though), but his reputationOf philanthropist , one of the most generous person Georgia has ever seen.However that's not all. When Ivanishvili stepped in to political stage, opposition was pretty much dismantled and weak, so were the hopes and chances of most georgians to change anything. Now there is a hope and this hope is even biggerThreat for Saakashvili. We have few months left until election, we all know it's gonna be dirtyFight without rules, many believe that Saakashvili will risk fate of theCountry to keep the power. Hopefully the west will see that at this point Saakshvili Is more liability then an asset and monitor this election with the Watchful eye.