The Washington Post’s Dana Milbankwrites in an article originally titled, “Trump brings on the death throes of white hegemony” and later changed to, “Obama was right: He came too early”:

Former Obama White House official Ben Rhodes, in his forthcoming memoir, tells of a moment of doubt the first African American president had after the election of Donald Trump on a campaign dominated by white grievance. “Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” President Barack Obama said in the passage, first reported this week by Peter Baker in the New York Times. I hate to say it, but I think the former president was correct. Ten or 20 years from now, America will be much closer to the majority-minority nation it is forecast to become in 2045. A racist backlash to a black president wouldn’t matter as much.

But what was naively proclaimed in 2008 as post-racial America was instead kindling for white insecurity, and Trump cunningly exploited and stoked racial grievance with his subtle and overt nods to white nationalism. He is now leading the backlash to the Obama years and is seeking to extend white dominion as long as possible, with attempts to stem immigration, to suppress minority voting and to deter minority census participation. It won’t work for long, but it might work for now. These are the death throes of white hegemony. And they are ugly. This week alone: ● Trump had no criticism for Roseanne Barr […] Let’s not be deceived: The racial wedge Trump has driven through the United States cleaves us deeper all the time. It has been shown in innumerable studies and regression analyses that the main predictor of support for Trump is racial anxiety — far more than economic anxiety.

[…] This will resolve itself naturally as 2045 comes and goes. The outcome of the struggle — fading white hegemony — is inevitable. What wasn’t inevitable is the Trump-led ugliness, while Trump’s fellow Republicans look away.

They said white people need to become a minority as fast as possible and open their borders because not to do so would cause “pain and violence and economic and social instability for millions of black and brown people.”

Donate to PNAG

Random Quote

"My concern is doing a away with whiteness....whiteness is a form of racial oppression. There can be no white race without the phenomenon of white supremacy. Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity. The task is to bring this minority together in such a way that it makes it impossible for the legacy of whiteness to continue to reproduce itself." -Noel Ignatiev, Harvard professor

*Antisemitism/White Supremacist Disclaimer

When you see the mention of “Jews” anywhere on this site, I am referring to people who practice the Jewish supremacist teachings of the Talmud, those who are actively participating in the undermining of European people’s governments, such as B’nai B’rith, the ADL, George Soros’ many foundations, immigration lobbyists, AIPAC, etc. I would say Zionists, but that would not be correct, what I really mean are Frankists/Sabbateans, sayanim and dual-citizen/dual-loyalty politicians. Antisemitism is a label used to slander anyone who exposes these issues of Jewish supremacism, the overuse of the term antisemitism has made it meaningless. To those who cry “white supremecist!” – For example, they label identitarians/alt-righters as white supremacists, when in reality we just see people as different, not superior and inferior. With Jewish supremacists, this is a case of psychological projection. According to the Talmud, when the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 Gentile(goyim) slaves. How can anyone who holds that as their end-goal call someone a supremacist?