"The dynamics surrounding EITC are changing," said Alex Brill, a researcher at the American Enterprise Institute, referring to the refundable tax credit for low-income workers. "There's a little bit of a shift among conservatives and Republicans -- an increased level of interest in issues around the working poor."

The EITC is the country's largest tax-code measure for reducing poverty. It was enacted during Republican Gerald Ford's presidency in 1975 and expanded by both parties since. President Barack Obama's proposed budget last week included a more generous tax credit for childless unmarried workers, and a bill before Congress would increase the hourly minimum pay. Though passing either this year is probably unlikely, today's discussions will help shape future policies aimed at alleviating poverty, said Brill, whose Washington-based group favors limited government and free markets.

As it now stands, the EITC is focused more on families and gives workers income-tax rebates for each dollar earned up to a limit. If it exceeds a person's tax liability, the government pays the difference. Single adults with no kids qualify for a maximum of about $500, married couples with three children can get about 12 times that much.

Obama Proposes Higher Credit, Increased Eligibility

Obama's proposal would double the maximum credit for childless single adults, raise the maximum amount one can earn and still qualify for the EITC and lower the minimum age for eligibility to 21 from 25. The changes would be funded by curbing tax breaks, including taxing the profits paid to investment managers, known as carried interest, at the higher rate of regular income.

"Young people who are trying to work their way through college at low incomes ought to have the benefit of an EITC," Lew said at a March 5 Senate hearing. "Tax proposals in this budget put burdens where they can be borne, in a way that's consistent with economic growth."

About 7.7 million workers would qualify for a larger credit, and 5.8 million more would become newly eligible for the EITC, according to the administration's analysis. That could lift 500,000 people out of poverty and reduce impoverishment for 10 million more.

Higher Minimum Wage Is Also Part of the Equation

Obama also supports moving the federal minimum wage to $10.10 from $7.25. Doing so would help get 900,000 people out of poverty, based on Congressional Budget office estimates, yet it could cost 500,000 jobs. The job loss is one reason billionaire investor Warren Buffett and Republicans favor expanding the tax credit over the minimum wage. "You can accomplish way more through the earned income tax credit without negative effects than the minimum wage," Buffett said, speaking on CNBC on March 3. "The earned income tax credit I think is much clearer."

Hubbard, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers during the George W. Bush administration, said in an interview that the minimum wage has "no justification," while the EITC encourages work and can help narrow America's opportunity divide. "This is about rewarding and supporting work, it's not simply about income," he said.

The proposed expansion of the credit could lift consumer spending by $3.5 billion between now and 2016, said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics Inc. in West Chester, Pa. Pairing it with the minimum-wage increase would increase the credit's spending effect to $4.7 billion, according to Zandi. An additional $10.4 billion in consumer spending would come from the minimum wage increase itself, for a total combined effect of $15.1 billion, he said.

Minimum-wage increase or no, Obama's tax-credit plan could be a tough sell. Though the measure commands bipartisan support, it's part of the president's budget request, which Republicans have dismissed as a non-starter. What's more, the EITC costs about $67 billion per year, and Obama's expansion would add $60 billion in costs over 10 years, according to the administration's analysis.

Where Will the Funding Come From? What About All Those Errors?

Both Harry Holzer, a Labor Department chief economist during Bill Clinton's administration, and Brill said the tax breaks the president would eliminate to make the credit expansion budget-neutral will be divisive. "It costs a lot of public money to do this, and last time I checked, those public dollars were in short supply," Holzer said during an American Enterprise Institute panel in February.

Without a minimum-wage increase, gains from a bigger tax credit might end up in employers' coffers, said Isabel Sawhill, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington. By drawing more people to apply for lower-paying jobs, the EITC can pressure wages, she said.

The number of young men, who would be most affected by the expansion of the tax credit, in the labor force would probably increase, said Holzer. Gains could be less dramatic than those documented following EITC expansions in the 1990s, which targeted single mothers, partly because the labor market is weaker now, he said.

Lower-Wage Jobs Would Become Easier to Fill

The changes would probably prompt more people to take lower-paying jobs that are going unfilled, said Holzer, a professor of public policy at Georgetown University in Washington. "When we talk about the childless credit, the goal is to reach young men, draw them back."

Holzer said a tax refund alone may not make low-wage jobs more attractive. The young men it targets face other barriers, including criminal records, lack of experience and an unemployment rate of 11.9 percent for 20 to 24 year-old as of February. Joblessness nationally stood at 6.7 percent last month. "All of that is a lot to overcome," he said. "The combination of a higher minimum wage and an EITC does more to make those jobs attractive than anything else."

Even if there is no action on Obama's tax-credit proposal, "many large policy reforms don't appear and get enacted in a single year, the legislative process takes time," Brill said. "We're going to be talking a lot about the EITC."

Add a Comment

5 Comments

Increase in Mimimum Hourly Wage - WITHOUT a comparable % increase in SS for Seniors and Disabled will cause DEATH. EVERYTHING goes up when the SS COLA goes up and this MHW up-tick will have the same effect! Except aged and infirm willbe forced to eat less, take less medicine and or FREEZ! The end result will be death of our seniors, aged and infirm!

Low INCOME workers don't PAY TAXES anyway or they get it all back at the end of the year in their returns. My nephew works mothers hours because he is a single parent of 2 boys. He takes home 9,000.00 a year. He has food stamps and his uncle pays all the rent. He then gets 5,000.00 a year form his tax return for his dependents. SO don;t tell me that these low income workers are going to get a break........ THEY ALREADY HAVE HUGE BREAKS! What about the middle class that carry the rest of this country on their backs each and every day? Where are the breaks for THEM?????????????????????????????

Lets make this an interest free loan, to be paid back via a 10 percent surcharge on these people's income once they are no longer eligible and their income exceeds 150 percent of the poverty level for the individual or family.