THE

WRITINGS OF KWANG-DZE.

INTRODUCTION.

BRIEF NOTICES OF THE DIFFERENT BOOKS.

BOOK I. HSIÂO-YÂO YO.

The three characters which form the title of this Book have all of them the
ideagram ###, (Ko), which gives the idea, as the Shwo Wän explains it, of 'now
walking, now halting.' We might render the title by 'Sauntering or Rambling
at Ease;' but it is the untroubled enjoyment of the mind which the author has
in view. And this enjoyment is secured by the Tâo, though that character does
not once occur in the Book. Kwang-Sze illustrates his thesis first by the cases
of creatures, the largest and the smallest, showing that however different they
may be in size, they should not pass judgment on one another, but may equally
find their happiness in the Tâo. From this he advances to men, and from the
cases of Yung-dze and Lieh-dze proceeds to that of one who finds his enjoyment
in himself, independent of every other being or instrumentality; and we have
the three important definitions of the accomplished Tâoist, as 'the Perfect
Man,' 'the Spirit-like Man,' and 'the Sagely Man.' Those definitions are then
illustrated;--the third in Yâo and Hsü Yû, and the second in the conversation
between Kien Wû and Lien Shû. The description given in this conversation
of the spirit-like man is very startling, and contains statements that are true
only of Him who is a 'Spirit,' 'the Blessed and only Potentate,' 'Who covereth
Himself with light as with a garment, Who stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain,

{p. 128}

Who layeth the beams of His chambers in the waters, Who maketh the clouds His
chariot, Who walketh on the wings of the wind,' 'Who rideth on a cherub,' 'Who
inhabiteth eternity.' The most imaginative and metaphorical expressions in the
Tâo Teh King about the power of the possessor of the Tâo are tame, compared
with the language of our author. I call attention to it here, as he often uses
the same extravagant style. There follows an illustration of 'the Perfect Man,'
which is comparatively feeble, and part of it, so far as I can see, inappropriate,
though Lin Hsî-kung says that all other interpretations of the sentences are
ridiculous.

In the seventh and last paragraph we have two illustrations that nothing is
really useless, if only used Tâoistically; 'to the same effect,' says Ziâo Hung,
'as Confucius in the Analects, XVII, ii.' They hang loosely, however, from what
precedes.

An old view of the Book was that Kwang-dze intended himself by the great phäng,
'which,' says Lû Shû-kih, 'is wide of the mark.'

BOOK II. KHÎ WÛ LUN.

Mr. Balfour has translated this title by 'Essay on the Uniformity of All Things;'
and, the subject of the Book being thus misconceived, his translation of it
could not fail to be very incorrect. The Chinese critics, I may say without
exception, construe the title as I have done. The second and third characters,
Wû Lun, are taken together, and mean 'Discussions about Things,' equivalent
to our 'Controversies.' They are under the government of the first character
Khî, used as a verb, with the signification of 'Harmonising,' or 'Adjusting.'
Let me illustrate this by condensing a passage from the 'Supplementary Commentary
of a Mr. Kang, a sub-secretary of the Imperial Chancery,' of the Ming dynasty
(###). He says, 'What Kwang-dze calls "Discussions about Things" has reference
to the various branches of the numerous schools, each of which has its own views,
conflicting with

{p. 129}

the views of the others.' He goes on to show that if they would only adopt
the method pointed out by Kwang-dze, 'their controversies would be adjusted
(###) using the first Khî in the passive voice.

This then was the theme of our author in this Book. It must be left for the
reader to discover from the translation how he pursues it. I pointed out a peculiarity
in the former Book, that though the idea of the Tâo underlies it all, the term
itself is never allowed to appear. Not only does the same idea underlie this
Book, but the name is frequently employed. The Tâo is the panacea for the evils
of controversy, the solvent through the use of which the different views of
men may be made to disappear.

That the Tâo is not a Personal name in the conception of Kwang-dze is seen
in several passages. We have not to go beyond the phenomena of nature to discover
the reason of their being what they are; nor have we to go beyond the bigoted
egoism and vaingloriousness of controversialists to find the explanation of
their discussions, various as these are, and confounding like the sounds of
the wind among the trees of a forest. To man, neither in nature nor in the sphere
of knowledge, is there any other 'Heaven' but what belongs to his own mind.
That is his only 'True Ruler.' If there be any other, we do not see His form,
nor any traces of His acting. Things come about in their proper course. We cannot
advance any proof of Creation. Whether we assume that there was something 'in
the beginning' or nothing, we are equally landed in contradiction and absurdity.
Let us stop at the limit of what we know, and not try to advance a step beyond
it.

Towards the end of the Book our author's agnosticism seems to reach its farthest
point. All human experience is spoken of as a dream or as 'illusion.' He who
calls another a dreamer does not know that he is not dreaming himself. One and
another commentator discover in such utterances something very like the Buddhist
doctrine that all life is but so much illusion (###). This notion has its consummation
in the story with which the Book concludes.

{p. 130}

Kwang-dze had dreamt that he was a butterfly. When he awoke, and was himself
again, he did not know whether he, Kwang Kâu, had been dreaming that he was
a butterfly, or was now a butterfly dreaming that it was Kwang Kâu. And yet
he adds that there must be a difference between Kâu and a butterfly, but he
does not say what that difference is. But had he ever dreamt that he was a butterfly,
so as to lose the consciousness of his personal identity as Kwang Kâu? I do
not think so. One may, perhaps, lose that consciousness in the state of insanity;
but the language of Young is not sufficiently guarded when he writes of

'Dreams, where thought, in fancy's maze, runs mad.'

When dreaming, our thoughts are not conditioned by the categories of time and
space; but the conviction of our identity is never lost.

BOOK III. YANG SHANG Kû.

'The Lord of Life' is the Tâo. It is to this that we are indebted for the origin
of life and for the preservation of it. Though not a Personal Being, it is here
spoken of as if it were,--'the Lord of Life;' just as in the preceding Book
it is made to appear as 'a True Governor,' and 'a True Ruler.' But how can we
nourish the Tâo? The reply is, By avoiding all striving to do so; by a passionless,
unstraining performance of what we have to do in our position in life; simply
allowing the Tâo to guide and nourish us, without doing anything to please ourselves
or to counteract the tendency of our being to decay and death.

Par. 1 exhibits the injury arising from not thus nourishing the life, and sets
forth the rule we are to pursue.

Par. 2 illustrates the observance of the rule by the perfect skill with which
the cook of the ruler Wän-hui of Wei cut up the oxen for his employer without
trouble to himself, or injury to his knife.

{p. 131}

Par. 3 illustrates the result of a neglect of one of the cautions in par. 1
to a certain master of the Left, who had brought on himself dismemberment in
the loss of one of his feet.

Par. 4 shows how even Lâo-dze had failed in nourishing 'the Lord of Life' by
neglecting the other caution, and allowing in his good-doing an admixture of
human feeling, which produced in his disciples a regard for him that was inconsistent
with the nature of the Tâo, and made them wail for him excessively on his death.
This is the most remarkable portion of the Book, and it is followed by a sentence
which implies that the existence of man's spirit continues after death has taken
place. His body is intended by the 'faggots' that are consumed by the fire.
That fire represents the spirit which may be transferred elsewhere.

Some commentators dwell on the analogy between this and the Buddhistic transrotation
of births; which latter teaching, however, they do not seem to understand. Others
say that 'the nourishment of the Lord of Life' is simply acting as Yü did when
he conveyed away the flooded waters 'by doing that which gave him no trouble;'--see
Mencius, IV, ii, 26.

In Kwang-dze there are various other stories of the same character as that
about king Wän-hui's cook,--e. g. XIX, 3 and XXII, 9. They are instances of
the dexterity acquired by habit, and should hardly be pressed into the service
of the doctrine of the Tâo.

BOOK IV. ZÄN KIEN SHIH.

A man has his place among other men in the world; he is a member, while he
lives, of the body of humanity. And as he has his place in society, so also
he has his special duties to discharge, according to his position, and his relation
to others. Tâoist writers refer to this Book as a proof of the practical character
of the writings of Kwang-dze.

{p. 132}

They are right to a certain extent in doing so; but the cases of relationship
which are exhibited and prescribed for are of so peculiar a character, that
the Book is of little value as a directory of human conduct and duty. In the
first two paragraphs we have the case of Yen Hui, who wishes to go to Wei, and
try to reform the character and government of its oppressive ruler; in the third
and fourth, that of the duke of Sheh, who has been entrusted by the king of
Khû with a difficult mission to the court of Khî, which is occasioning
him much anxiety and apprehension; and in the fifth, that of a Yen Ho, who is
about to undertake the office of teacher to the son of duke Ling of Wei, a young
man with a very bad natural disposition. The other four paragraphs do not seem
to come in naturally after these three cases, being occupied with two immense
and wonderful trees, the case of a poor deformed cripple, and the lecture for
the benefit of Confucius by 'the madman of Khû.' In all these last paragraphs,
the theme is the usefulness, to the party himself at least, of being of no use.

Confucius is the principal speaker in the first four paragraphs. In what he
says to Yen Hui and the duke of Sheh there is much that is shrewd and good;
but we prefer the practical style of his teachings, as related by his own disciples
in the Confucian Analects. Possibly, it was the object of Kwang-dze to exhibit
his teaching, as containing, without his being aware of it, much of the mystical
character of the Tâoistic system. His conversation with the duke of Sheh, however,
is less obnoxious to this charge than what he is made to say to Yen Hui. The
adviser of Yen Ho is a Kü Po-yü, a disciple of Confucius, who still has a place
in the sage's temples.

In the conclusion, the Tâoism of our author comes out in contrast with the
methods of Confucius. His object in the whole treatise, perhaps, was to show
how 'the doing nothing, and yet thereby doing everything,' was the method to
be pursued in all the intercourses of society.

{p. 133}

BOOK V. TEH KHUNG FÛ.

The fû (###) consisted in the earliest times of two slips of bamboo made
with certain marks, so as to fit to each other exactly, and held by the two
parties to any agreement or covenant. By the production and comparison of the
slips, the parties verified their mutual relation; and the claim of the one
and the obligation of the other were sufficiently established. 'Seal' seems
the best translation of the character in this title.

By 'virtue' (###) we must understand the characteristics of the Tâo. Where
those existed in their full proportions in any individual, there was sure to
be the evidence or proof of them in the influence which he exerted in all his
intercourse with other men; and the illustration of this is the subject of this
Book, in all its five paragraphs. That influence is the 'Seal' set on him, proving
him to be a true child of the Tâo.

The heroes, as I may call them, of the first three paragraphs are all men who
had lost their feet, having been reduced to that condition as a punishment,
just or unjust, of certain offences; and those of the last two are distinguished
by their extraordinary ugliness or disgusting deformity. But neither the loss
of their feet nor their deformities trouble the serenity of their own minds,
or interfere with the effects of their teaching and character upon others; so
superior is their virtue to the deficiencies in their outward appearance.

Various brief descriptions of the Tâo are interspersed in the Book. The most
remarkable of them are those in par. 1, where it appears as 'that in which there
is no element of falsehood,' and as 'the author of all the Changes or Transformations'
in the world. The sentences where these occur are thus translated by Mr. Balfour:--'He
seeks to know Him in whom is nothing false. He would not be affected by the
instability of creation; even if his life were involved in the general destruction,
he would yet hold firmly to his faith (in God).' And he observes in a

{p. 134}

note, that the first short sentence 'is explained by the commentators as referring
to Kän Zâi (###), the term used by the Tâoist school for God.' But we met with
that name and synonyms of it in Book II, par. 2, as appellations of the Tâo,
coupled with the denial of its personality. Kän Zâi, 'the True Governor or Lord,'
may be used as a designation for god or God, but the Tâoist school denies the
existence of a Personal Being, to whom we are accustomed to apply that name.

Hui-dze, the sophist and friend of Kwang-dze, is introduced in the conclusion
as disputing with him the propriety of his representing the Master of the Tâo
as being still 'a man;' and is beaten down by him with a repetition of his assertions,
and a reference to some of Hui-dze's well-known peculiarities. What would Kwang-dze
have said, if his opponent had affirmed that his instances were all imaginary,
and that no man had ever appeared who could appeal to his possession of such
a 'seal' to his virtues and influence as he described?

Lû Fang-wäng compares with the tenor of this Book what we find in Mencius,
VII, i, 21, about the nature of the superior man. The analogy between them,
however, is very faint and incomplete.

BOOK VI. TÂ ZUNG SHIH.

So I translate the title of this Book, taking Zung as a verb, and Zung Shih
as = 'The Master who is Honoured.' Some critics take Zung in the sense of 'Originator,'
in which it is employed in the Tâo Teh King, lxx, 2. Whichever rendering be
adopted, there is no doubt that the title is intended to be a designation of
the Tâo; and no one of our author's Books is more important for the understanding
of his system of thought.

The key to it is found in the first of its fifteen paragraphs. There are in
man two elements;-the Heavenly or Tâoistic, and the human. The disciple of the
Tâo, recognising them both, cultivates what he knows as a man

{p. 135}

so as to become entirely conformed to the action of the Tâo, and submissive
in all the most painful experiences in his lot, which is entirely ordered by
it. A seal will be set on the wisdom of this course hereafter, when he has completed
the period of his existence on earth, and returns to the state of non-existence,
from which the Tâo called him to be born as a man. In the meantime he may attain
to be the True man possessing the True knowledge.

Our author then proceeds to give his readers in five paragraphs his idea of
the True Man. Mr. Balfour says that this name is to be understood 'in the esoteric
sense, the partaking of the essence of divinity,' and he translates it by 'the
Divine Man.' But we have no right to introduce here the terms 'divine' and 'divinity.'
Nan-hwâi (VII, 5b) gives a short definition of the name which is more to the
point:--'What we call "the True Man" is one whose nature is in agreement with
the Tâo (###) and the commentator adds in a note, 'Such men as Fû-hsî,
Hwang-Tî, and Lâo Tan.' The Khang-hsî dictionary commences its account of the
character ### or 'True' by a definition of the True Man taken from the Shwo
Wän as a ###, 'a recluse of the mountain, whose bodily form has been changed,
and who ascends to heaven;' but when that earliest dictionary was made, Tâoism
had entered into a new phase, different from what it had in the time of our
author. The most prominent characteristic of the True Man is that he is free
from all exercise of thought and purpose, a being entirely passive in the hands
of the Tâo. In par. 3 seven men are mentioned, good and worthy men, but inferior
to the True.

Having said what he had to say of the True Man, Kwang-dze comes in the seventh
paragraph to speak directly of the Tâo itself, and describes it with many wonderful
predicates which exalt it above our idea of God;-a concept and not a personality.
He concludes by mentioning a number of ancient personages who had got the Tâo,
and by it wrought wonders, beginning with a Shih-wei, who preceded Fû-hsî,
and ending with Fû Yüeh, the minister of

{p. 136}

Wû-ting, in the fourteenth century B. C., and who finally became a star
in the eastern portion of the zodiac. Phäng Zû is also mentioned as living,
through his possession of the Tâo, from the twenty-third century 13. C. to the
seventh or later. The sun and moon and the constellation of the Great Bear are
also mentioned as its possessors, and the fabulous Being called the Mother of
the Western King. The whole passage is perplexing to the reader to the last
degree.

The remaining paragraphs are mostly occupied with instances of learning the
Tâo, and of its effects in making men superior to the infirmities of age and
the most terrible deformities of person and calamities of penury; as 'Tranquillity'
under all that might seem most calculated to disturb it. Very strange is the
attempt at the conclusion of par. 8 apparently to trace the genesis of the knowledge
of the Tâo. Confucius is introduced repeatedly as the expounder of Tâoism, and
made to praise it as the ne plus ultra of human attainment.

BOOK VII. YING TÎ WANG.

The first of the three characters in this title renders the translation of
it somewhat perplexing. Ying has different meanings according as it is read
in the first tone or in the third. In the first tone it is the symbol of what
is right, or should be; in the third tone of answering or responding to. 1 prefer
to take it here in the first tone. As Kwo, Hsiang says, 'One who is free from
mind or purpose of his own, and loves men to become transformed of themselves,
is fit to be a Ruler or a King,' and as Zhui Kwan, another early commentator,
says, 'He whose teaching is that which is without words, and makes men in the
world act as if they were oxen or horses, is fit to be a Ruler or a King.' This
then is the object of the Book--to describe that government which exhibits the
Tâo equally in the rulers and the ruled, the world of men all happy and good
without purpose or effort.

It consists of seven paragraphs. The first shows us the model ruler in him
of the line of Thâi, whom I have not

{p. 137}

succeeded in identifying. The second shows us men under such a rule, uncontrolled
and safe like the bird that flies high beyond the reach of the archer, and the
mouse secure in its deep hole from its pursuers. The teacher in this portion
is Khieh-yü, known in the Confucian school as 'the madman of Khû,' and
he delivers his lesson in opposition to the heresy of a Zäh-kung Shih, or 'Noon
Beginning.' In the third paragraph the speakers are 'a nameless man,' and a
Thien Kän, or 'Heaven Root.' In the fourth paragraph Lâo-dze himself appears
upon the stage, and lectures a Yang Dze-kü, the Yang Kû of Mencius. He
concludes by saying that 'where the intelligent kings took their stand could
not be fathomed, and they found their enjoyment in (the realm of) nonentity.'

The fifth paragraph is longer, and tells us of the defeat of a wizard, a physiognomist
in Käng, by Hû-dze, the master of the philosopher Lieh-dze, who is thereby
delivered from the glamour which the cheat was throwing round him. I confess
to not being able to understand the various processes by which Hû-dze
foils the wizard and makes him run away. The whole story is told, and at greater
length, in the second book of the collection ascribed to Lieh-dze, and the curious
student may like to look at the translation of that work by Mr. Ernst Faber
(Der Naturalismus bei den alten Chinesen sowohl nach der Seite des Pantheismus
als des Sensualismus, oder die Sämmtlichen Werke des Philosophen Licius, 1877).
The effect of the wizard's defeat on Lieh-dze was great. He returned in great
humility to his house, and did not go out of it for three years. He did the
cooking for his wife, and fed the pigs as if he were feeding men. He returned
to pure simplicity, and therein continued to the end of his life. But I do not
see the connexion between this narrative and the government of the Rulers and
Kings.

The sixth paragraph is a homily by our author himself on 'non-action.' It contains
a good simile, comparing the mind of the perfect man to a mirror, which reflects
faithfully what comes before it, but does not retain any image of it, when the
mind is gone.

{p. 138}

The last paragraph is an ingenious and interesting allegory relating how the
gods of the southern and northern seas brought Chaos to an end by boring holes
in him. Thereby they destroyed the primal simplicity, and according to Tâoism
did Chaos an injury! On the whole I do not think that this Book, with which
the more finished essays of Kwang-dze come to an end, is so successful as those
that precede it.

BOOK VIII. PHIEN MÂU.

This Book brings us to the Second Part of the writings of our author, embracing
in all fifteen Books. Of the most important difference between the Books of
the First and the other Parts some account has been given in the Introductory
Chapter. We have here to do only with the different character of their titles,
Those of the seven preceding Books are so many theses, and are believed to have
been prefixed to them by Kwang-dze himself; those of this Book and the others
that follow are believed to have been prefixed by Kwo Hsiang, and consist of
two or three characters taken from the beginning, or near the beginning of the
several Books, after the fashion of the names of the Books in the Confucian
Analects, in the works of Mencius, and in our Hebrew Scriptures. Books VIII
to XIII are considered to be supplementary to VII by Aû-yang Hsiû.

The title of this eighth Book, Phien Mâu, has been rendered by Mr. Balfour,
after Dr. Williams, 'Double Thumbs.' But the Mâu, which may mean either the
Thumb or the Great Toe, must be taken in the latter sense, being distinguished
in this paragraph and elsewhere from Kih, 'a finger,' and expressly specified
also as belonging to the foot. The character phien, as used here, is defined
in the Khang-hsî dictionary as 'anything additional growing out as an appendage
or excrescence, a growing out at the side.' This would seem to justify the translation
of it by 'double.' But in paragraph 3, while the extra finger increases the
number of the fingers, this growth on the foot is represented as diminishing
the number of the toes. I must consider

{p. 139}

the phien therefore as descriptive of an appendage by which the great toe was
united to one or all of the other toes, and can think of no better rendering
of the title than what I have given. It is told in the Zo Kwan (twenty-third
year of duke Hsî) that the famous duke Wän of Zin had phien hsieh, that is,
that his ribs presented the appearance of forming one bone. So much for the
title.

The subject-matter of the Book seems strange to us; that, according to the
Tâo, benevolence and righteousness are not natural growths of humanity, but
excrescences on it, like the extra finger on the hand, and the membranous web
of the toes. The weakness of the Tâoistic system begins to appear. Kwang-dze's
arguments in support of his position must be pronounced very feeble. The ancient
Shun is introduced as the first who called in the two great virtues to distort
and vex the world, keeping society for more than a thousand years in a state
of uneasy excitement. Of course he assumes that prior to Shun, he does not say
for how long a time (and in other places he makes decay to have begun earlier),
the world had been in a state of paradisiacal innocence and simplicity, under
the guidance of the Tâo, untroubled by any consideration of what was right and
what was wrong, men passively allowing their nature to have its quiet development,
and happy in that condition. All culture of art or music is wrong, and so it
is wrong and injurious to be striving to manifest benevolence and to maintain
righteousness.

He especially singles out two men, one of the twelfth century B. C., the famous
Po-î, who died of hunger rather than acknowledge the dynasty of Kâu; and one
of a more recent age, the robber Shih, a great leader of brigands, who brought
himself by his deeds to an untimely end; and he sees nothing to choose between
them. We must give our judgment for the teaching of Confucianism in preference
to that of Tâoism, if our author can be regarded as a fair expositor of the
latter. He is ingenious in his statements and illustrations, but he was, like
his master Lâo-dze, only a dreamer.

{p. 140}

BOOK IX MÂ THÎ.

'Horses' and 'Hoofs' are the first two characters of the Text, standing there
in the relation of regent and regimen. The account of the teaching of the Book
given by Lin Hsî-kung is so concise that I will avail myself of it. He says:--

'Governing men is like governing horses. They may be governed in such a way
as shall be injurious to them, just as Po-lâo governed the horse;--contrary
to its true nature. His method was not different from that of the (first) potter
and carpenter in dealing with clay and wood;--contrary to the nature of those
substances. Notwithstanding this, one age after another has celebrated the skill
of those parties;--not knowing what it is that constitutes the good and skilful
government of men. Such government simply requires that men be made to fulfil
their regular constant nature,--the qualities which they all possess in common,
with which they are constituted by Heaven, and then be left to themselves. It
was this which constituted the age of perfect virtue; but when the sages insisted
on the practice of benevolence, righteousness, ceremonies, and music, then the
people began to be without that perfect virtue. Not that they were in themselves
different from what they had been, but those practices do not really belong
to their regular nature; they arose from their neglecting the characteristics
of the Tâo, and abandoning their natural constitution; it was the case of the
skilful artisan cutting and hacking his raw materials in order to form vessels
from them. There is no ground for doubting that Po-lâo's management of horses
gave them that knowledge with which they went on to play the part of thieves,
or that it was the sages' government of the people which made them devote themselves
to the pursuit of gain;--it is impossible to deny the error of those sages.

'There is but one idea in the Book from the beginning to the end;--it is an
amplification of the expression in the preceding Book that "all men have their
regular and constant

{p. 141}

constitution," and is the most easily construed of all Kwang-dze's compositions.
In consequence, however, of the wonderful touches of his pencil in describing
the sympathy between men and other creatures in their primal state, some have
imagined that there is a waste and embellishment of language, and doubted whether
the Book is really his own, but thought it was written by some one in imitation
of his style. I apprehend that no other hand would easily have attained to such
a mastery of that style.'

There is no possibility of adjudicating definitely on the suspicion of the
genuineness of the Book thus expressed in Hsî-kung's concluding remarks. The
same suspicion arose in my own mind in the process of translation. My surprise
continues that our author did not perceive the absurdity of his notions of the
primal state of men, and of his condemnation of the sages.

BOOK X. KHÜ KHIEH.

It is observed by the commentator Kwei Kän-khüan that one idea runs through
this Book:--that the most sage and wise men have ministered to theft and robbery,
and that, if there were an end of sageness and wisdom, the world would be at
rest. Between it and the previous Book there is a general agreement in argument
and object, but in this the author expresses himself with greater vehemence,
and almost goes to excess in his denunciation of the institutions of the sages.

The reader will agree with these accounts of the Book. Kwang-dze at times becomes
weak in his attempts to establish his points. To my mind the most interesting
portions of this Book and the last one are the full statements which we have
in them of the happy state of men when the Tâo maintained its undisputed sway
in the world, and the names of many of the early Tâoistic sovereigns. How can
we suppose that anything would be gained by a return to the condition of primitive
innocence and simplicity? The antagonism between Tâoism and Confucianism comes
out in this Book very decidedly.

{p. 142}

The title of the Book is taken from two characters in the first clause of the
first paragraph.

BOOK XI. ZÂI YÛ.

The two characters of the title are taken from the first sentence of the Text,
but they express the subject of the Book more fully than the other titles in
this Part do, and almost entitle it to a place in Part I. It is not easy to
translate them, and Mr. Balfour renders them by 'Leniency towards Faults,' probably
construing Zâi as equivalent to our preposition 'in,' which it often is. But
Kwang-dze uses both Zâi and Yû as verbs, or blends them together, the
chief force of the binomial compound being derived from the significance of
the Zâi. Zâi is defined by Zhun (###) which gives the idea of 'preserving' or
'keeping intact,' and Yû by Khwan (###),'being indulgent' or 'forbearing.'
The two characters are afterwards exchanged for other two, wû wei (###)
'doing nothing,' 'inaction,' a grand characteristic of the Tâo.

The following summary of the Book is taken from Hsüan Ying's explanations of
our author:--'The two characters Zâi Yû express the subject-matter of
the Book, and "governing" points out the opposite error as the disease into
which men are prone to fall. Let men be, and the tendencies of their nature
will be at rest, and there will be no necessity for governing the world. Try
to govern it, and the world will be full of trouble; and men will not be able
to rest in the tendencies of their nature. These are the subjects of the first
two paragraphs.

'In the third paragraph we have the erroneous view of Zhui Khü that by government
it was possible to make men's minds good. He did not know that governing was
a disturbing meddling with the minds of men; and how Lâo-dze set forth the evil
of such government, going on till it be irretrievable. This long paragraph vigorously
attacks the injury done by governing.

'In the fourth paragraph, when Hwang-Tî questions

{p. 143}

Kwang Khäng-dze, the latter sets aside his inquiry about the government of
the world, and tells him about the government of himself; and in the fifth,
when Yün Kiang asks Hung Mung about governing men, the latter tells him about
the nourishing of the heart. These two great paragraphs set forth clearly the
subtlest points in the policy of Let-a-be. Truly it is not an empty name.

'In the two last paragraphs, Kwang in his own words and way sets forth, now
by affirmation, and now by negation, the meaning of all that precedes.'

This summary of the Book will assist the reader in understanding it. For other
remarks that will be helpful, I must refer him to the notes appended to the
Text. The Book is not easy to understand or to translate; and a remark found
in the Kiâ-khing edition of 'the Ten Philosophers,' by Lû Hsiû-fû,
who died in 1279, was welcome to me, 'If you cannot understand one or two sentences
of Kwang-dze, it does not matter.'

BOOK XII. THIEN TÎ.

The first two characters of the Book are adopted as its name;--Thien Tî, 'Heaven
and Earth.' These are employed, not so much as the two greatest material forms
in the universe, but as the Great Powers whose influences extend to all below
and upon them. Silently and effectively, with entire spontaneity, their influence
goes forth, and a rule and pattern is thus given to those on whom the business
of the government of the world devolves. The one character 'Heaven' is employed
throughout the Book as the denomination of this purposeless spontaneity which
yet is so powerful.

Lû Shû-kih says:--'This Book also sets forth clearly how the rulers
of the world ought simply to act in accordance with the spontaneity of the virtue
of Heaven; abjuring sageness and putting away knowledge; and doing nothing:--in
this way the Tâo or proper Method of Government will be attained to. As to the
coercive methods of Mo Tî

{p. 144}

and Hui-dze, they only serve to distress those who follow them.'

This object of the Book appears, more or less distinctly, in most of the illustrative
paragraphs; though, as has been pointed out in the notes upon it, several of
them must be considered to be spurious. Paragraphs 6, 7, and 11 are thus called
in question, and, as most readers will feel, with reason. From 13 to the end,
the paragraphs are held to be one long paragraph where Kwang-dze introduces
his own reflections in an unusual style; but the genuineness of the whole, so
far as I have observed, has not been called in question.

BOOK XIII. THIEN TÂO.

'Thien Tâo,' the first two characters of the first paragraph, and prefixed
to the Book as the name of it, are best translated by 'The Way of Heaven,' meaning
the noiseless spontaneity, which characterises all the operations of nature,
proceeding silently, yet 'perfecting all things.' As the rulers of the world
attain to this same way in their government, and the sages among men attain
to it in their teachings, both government and doctrine arrive at a corresponding
perfection. 'The joy of Heaven' and 'the joy of Men' are both realised. There
ought to be no purpose or will in the universe. 'Vacancy, stillness, placidity,
tastelessness, quietude, silence, and non-action; this is the perfection of
the Tâo and its characteristics.'

Our author dwells especially on doing-nothing or non-action as the subject-matter
of the Book. But as the world is full of doing, he endeavours to make a distinction
between the Ruling Powers and those subordinate to and employed by them, to
whom doing or action and purpose, though still without the thought of self,
are necessary; and by this distinction he seems to me to give up the peculiarity
of his system, so that some of the critics, especially Aû-yang Hsiû,
are obliged to confess that these portions of the Book are unlike the writing
of Kwang-dze. Still the antagonism of Tâoism to Confucianism is very apparent

{p. 145}

throughout. Of the illustrative paragraphs, the seventh, relating the churlish
behaviour of Lâo-dze to Confucius, and the way in which he subsequently argues
with him and snubs him, is very amusing. The eighth paragraph, relating the
interview between Lâo and Shih-khäng Khî, is very strange. The allusions in
it to certain incidents and peculiarities in Lâo's domestic life make us wish
that we had fuller accounts of his history; and the way in which he rates his
disciple shows him as a master of the language of abuse.

The concluding paragraph about duke Hwan of Khî is interesting, but I can only
dimly perceive its bearing on the argument of the Book.

BOOK XIV. THIEN YÜN.

The contrast between the movement of the heavens (###), and the resting of
the earth (###), requires the translation of the characters of the title by
'The Revolution of Heaven.' But that idea does not enter largely into the subject-matter
of the Book. 'The whole,' says Hsüan Ying, 'consists of eight paragraphs, the
first three of which show that under the sky there is nothing which is not dominated
by the Tâo, with which the Tîs and the Kings have only to act in accordance;
while the last five set forth how the Tâo is not to be found in the material
forms and changes of things, but in a spirit-like energy working imperceptibly,
developing and controlling all phenomena.'

I have endeavoured in the notes on the former three paragraphs to make their
meaning less obscure and unconnected than it is on a first perusal. The five
illustrative paragraphs are, we may assume, all of them factitious, and can
hardly be received as genuine productions of Kwang-dze. In the sixth paragraph,
or at least a part of it, Lin Hsî-kung acknowledges the hand of the forger,
and not less unworthy of credence are in my opinion the rest of it and much
of the other four paragraphs. If they may be

{p. 146}

taken as from the hand of our author himself, he was too much devoted to his
own system to hold the balance of judgment evenly between Lâo and Khung.

BOOK XV. KHO Î.

I can think of no better translation for ###, the two first characters of the
Book, and which appear as its title, than our 'Ingrained Ideas;' notions, that
is, held as firmly as if they were cut into the substance of the mind. They
do not belong to the whole Book, however, but only to the first member of the
first paragraph. That paragraph describes six classes of men, only the last
of which are the right followers of the Tâo;--the Sages, from the Tâoistic point
of view, who again are in the last sentence of the last paragraph identified
with 'the True Men' described at length in the sixth Book. The fifth member
of this first paragraph is interesting as showing how there was a class of Tâoists
who cultivated the system with a view to obtain longevity by their practices
in the management of the breath; yet our author does not accord to them his
full approbation, while at the same time the higher Tâoism appears in the last
paragraph, as promoting longevity without the management of the breath. Khû
Po-hsiû, in his commentary on Kwang-dze, which was published in 1210,
gives Po-î and Shû-khî as instances of the first class spoken of here;
Confucius and Mencius, of the second; Î Yin and Fû Yüeh, of the third;
Khâo Fû and Hsü Yû, as instances of the fourth. Of the fifth class
he gives no example, but that of Phäng Zû mentioned in it.

That which distinguishes the genuine sage, the True Man of Tâoism, is his pure
simplicity in pursuing the Way, as it is seen in the operation of Heaven and
Earth, and nourishing his spirit accordingly, till there ensues an ethereal
amalgamation between his Way and the orderly operation of Heaven. This subject
is pursued to the end of the Book. The most remarkable predicate of the spirit
so trained is that in the third paragraph,--that 'Its name is the

{p. 147}

same as Tî or God;' on which none of the critics has been able to throw any
satisfactory light. Balfour's version is:--'Its name is called "One with God;"'
Giles's, 'Its name is then "Of God,"' the 'then' being in consequence of his
view that the subject is 'man's spiritual existence before he is born into the
world of mortals.' My own view of the meaning appears in my version.

Lin Hsî-kung, however, calls the genuineness of the whole Book into question,
and thinks it may have proceeded from the same hand as Book XIII. They have
certainly one peculiarity in common;-many references to sayings which cannot
be traced, but are introduced by the formula of quotation, 'Therefore, it is
said.'

BOOK XVI. SHAN HSING.

'Rectifying or Correcting the Nature' is the meaning of the title, and expresses
sufficiently well the subject-matter of the Book. It was written to expose the
'vulgar' learning of the time as contrary to the principles of the true Tâoism,
that learning being, according to Lû Shû-kih, 'the teachings of
Hui-dze and Kung-sun Lung.' It is to be wished that we had fuller accounts of
these. But see in Book XXXIII.

Many of the critics are fond of comparing the Book with the 21st chapter of
the 7th Book of Mencius, part i, where that philosopher sets forth 'Man's own
nature as the most important thing to him, and the source of his true enjoyment,'
which no one can read without admiration. But we have more sympathy with Mencius's
fundamental views about our human nature, than with those of Kwang-dze and his
Tâoism. Lin Hsî-kung is rather inclined to doubt the genuineness of the Book.
Though he admires its composition, and admits the close and compact sequence
of its sentences, there is yet something about it that does not smack of Kwang-dze's
style. Rather there seems to me to underlie it the antagonism of Lâo and Kwang
to the learning of the Confucian school. The only characteristic

{p. 148}

of our author which I miss, is the illustrative stories of which he is generally
so profuse. In this the Book agrees with the preceding.

BOOK XVII. KHIÛ SHUI.

Khiû Shui, or 'Autumn Waters,' the first two characters of the first
paragraph of this Book, are adopted as its title. Its subject, in that paragraph,
however, is not so much the waters of autumn, as the greatness of the Tâo in
its spontaneity, when it has obtained complete dominion over man. No illustration
of the Tâo is so great a favourite with Lâo-dze as water, but he loved to set
it forth in its quiet, onward movement, always seeking the lowest place, and
always exercising a beneficent influence. But water is here before Kwang-dze
in its mightiest volume,--the inundated Ho and the all but boundless magnitude
of the ocean; and as he takes occasion from those phenomena to deliver his lessons,
I translate the title by 'The Floods of Autumn.'

To adopt the account of the Book given by Lû Shû-kih:--'This Book,'
he says, shows how its spontaneity is the greatest characteristic of the Tâo,
and the chief thing inculcated in it is that we must not allow the human element
to extinguish in our constitution the Heavenly.

'First, using the illustrations of the Ho and the Sea, our author gives us
to see the Five Tîs and the Kings of the Three dynasties as only exhibiting
the Tâo, in a small degree, while its great development is not to be found in
outward form and appliances so that it cannot be described in words, and it
is difficult to find its point of commencement, which indeed appears to be impracticable,
while still by doing nothing the human may be united with the Heavenly, and
men may bring back their True condition. By means of the conversations between
the guardian spirit of the Ho and Zo (the god) of the Sea this subject is exhaustively
treated.

'Next (in paragraph 8), the khwei, the millepede, and other subjects illustrate
how the mind is spirit-like in its spontaneity and doing nothing. The case of
Confucius (in par. 9) shows the same spontaneity, transforming violence.

{p. 149}

Kung-sun Lung (in par. 10), refusing to comply with that spontaneity, and seeking
victory by his sophistical reasonings, shows his wisdom to be only like the
folly of the frog in the well. The remaining three paragraphs bring before us
Kwang-dze by the spontaneity of his Tâo, now superior to the allurements of
rank; then, like the phœnix flying aloft, as enjoying himself in perfect ease;
and finally, as like the fishes, in the happiness of his self-possession.' Such
is a brief outline of this interesting chapter. Many of the critics would expunge
the ninth and tenth paragraphs as unworthy of Kwang-dze, the former as misrepresenting
Confucius, the latter as extolling himself. I think they may both be allowed
to stand as from his pencil.

BOOK XVIII. KIH LO.

The title of this Book, Kih Lo, or 'Perfect Enjoyment,' may also be received
as describing the subject-matter of it. But the author does not tell us distinctly
what he means by 'Perfect Enjoyment.' It seems to involve two elements, freedom
from trouble and distress, and freedom from the fear of death. What men seek
for as their chief good would only be to him burdens. He does not indeed altogether
condemn them, but his own quest is the better and more excellent way. His own
enjoyment is to be obtained by means of doing nothing; that is, by the Tâo;
of which passionless and purposeless action is a chief characteristic; and is
at the same time the most effective action, as is illustrated in the operation
of heaven and earth.

Such is the substance of the first paragraph. The second is interesting as
showing how his principle controlled Kwang-dze on the death of his wife. Paragraph
3 shows us two professors of Tâoism delivered by it from the fear of their own
death. Paragraph 4 brings our author before us talking to a skull, and then
the skull's appearance to him in a dream and telling him of the happiness of
the state after death. Paragraph 5 is occupied with Confucius and his favourite
disciple Yen Hui. It stands by itself, unconnected with the rest of the Book,
and its

{p. 150}

genuineness is denied by some Commentators. The last paragraph, found in an
enlarged form in the Books ascribed to Lieh-dze, has as little to do as the
fifth with the general theme of the Book, and is a strange anticipation in China
of the transrotation or transformation system of Buddhism.

Indeed, after reading this. Book, we cease to wonder that Tâoism and Buddhism
should in many practices come so near each other.

BOOK XIX. TÂ SHÄNG.

I have been inclined to translate the title of this Book by 'The Fuller Understanding
of Life,' with reference to what is said in the second Book on 'The Nourishment
of the Lord of Life.' There the Life before the mind of the writer is that of
the Body; here he extends his view also to the Life of the Spirit. The one subject
is not kept, however, with sufficient distinctness apart from the other, and
the profusion of illustrations, taken, most of them, from the works of Lieh-dze,
is perplexing.

To use the words of Lû Shû-khî:--'This Book shows how he who would
skilfully nourish his life, must maintain his spirit complete, and become one
with Heaven. These two ideas preside in it throughout. In par. 2, the words
of the Warden Yin show that the spirit kept complete is beyond the reach of
harm. In 3, the illustration of the hunchback shows how the will must be maintained
free from all confusion. In 4, that of the ferryman shows that to the completeness
of the spirit there is required the disregard of life or death. In 5 and 6,
the words of Thien Khâi-kih convey a warning against injuring the life by the
indulgence of sensual desires. In 7, the sight of a sprite by duke Hwan unsettles
his spirit. In 8, the gamecock is trained so as to preserve the spirit unagitated.
In 9, we see the man in the water of the cataract resting calmly in his appointed
lot. In 10, we have the maker of the bell-stand completing his work as he did
in accordance with the mind of Heaven. All these instances show how the

{p. 151}

spirit is nourished. The reckless charioteering of Tung Yê in par. 11,
not stopping when the strength of his horses was exhausted, and the false pretext
of Sun Hsiû, clear as at noon-day, are instances of a different kind;
while in the skilful Shui, hardly needing the application of his mind, and fully
enjoying himself in all things, his movements testify of his harmony with Heaven,
and his spiritual completeness.'

BOOK XX. SHAN MÛ.

It requires a little effort to perceive that Shan Mû, the title of this
Book, does not belong to it as a whole, but only to the first of its nine paragraphs.
That speaks of a large tree which our author once saw on a mountain. The other
paragraphs have nothing to do with mountain trees, large or small. As the last
Book might be considered to be supplementary to 'the Nourishment of Life,' discussed
in Book III, so this is taken as having the same relation to Book IV, which
treats of 'Man in the World, associated with other men.' It shows by its various
narratives, some of which are full of interest, how by a strict observance of
the principles and lessons of the Tâo a man may preserve his life and be happy,
may do the right thing and enjoy himself and obtain the approbation of others
in the various circumstances in which he may be placed. The themes both of Books
I and IV blend together in it. Paragraph 8 has more the character of an apologue
than most of Kwang-dze's stories.

BOOK XXI, THIEN DZE-FANG.

Thien dze-fang is merely the name of one of the men who appear in the first
paragraph. That he was a historical character is learned from the 'Plans of
the Warring States,' XIV, art. 6, where we find him at the court of the marquis
Wän of Wei (B. C. 424-387), acting as counsellor to that ruler. Thien was his
surname; Dze-fang his designation,

{p. 152}

and Wû-kâi his name. He has nothing to do with any of the paragraphs
but the first.

It is not easy to reduce all the narratives or stories in the Book to one category.
The fifth, seventh, and eighth, indeed, are generally rejected as spurious,
or unworthy of our author; and the sixth and ninth are trivial, though the ninth
bears all the marks of his graphic style. Paragraphs 3 and 4 are both long and
important. A common idea in them and in 1, 2, and 10, seems to be that the presence
and power of the Tâo cannot be communicated by words, and are independent. of
outward condition and circumstances.

BOOK XXII. KIH PEI YÛ

With this Book the Second Part of Kwang-dze's Essays or Treatises ends. 'All
the Books in it,' says Lû Shû-kih, 'show the opposition of Tâoism
to the pursuit of knowledge as enjoined in the Confucian and other schools;
and this Book may be regarded as the deepest, most vehement, and clearest of
them all.' The concluding sentences of the last paragraph and Lâo-dze's advice
to Confucius in par. 5, to 'sternly repress his knowledge,' may be referred
to as illustrating the correctness of Lû's remark.

Book seventeenth is commonly considered to be the most eloquent of Kwang-dze's
Treatises, but this twenty-second Book is not inferior to it in eloquence, and
it is more characteristic of his method of argument. The way in which he runs
riot in the names with which he personifies the attributes of the Tâo, is a
remarkable instance of the subtle manner in which he often brings out his ideas;
and in no other Book does he set forth more emphatically what his own idea of
the Tâo was, though the student often fails to be certain that he has exactly
caught the meaning.

The title, let it be observed, belongs only to the first paragraph. The Kih
in it must be taken in the sense of 'knowledge,' and not of 'wisdom.'

{p. 153}

BOOK XXIII. KÄNG-SANG KHÛ.

It is not at all certain that there ever was such a personage as Käng-sang
Khû, who gives its name to the Book. In his brief memoir of Kwang-dze,
Sze-mâ Khien spells, as we should say, the first character of the surname differently,
and for the Käng (###), employs Khang (###), adding his own opinion, that there
was nothing in reality corresponding to the account given of the characters
in this and some other Books. They would be therefore the inventions of Kwang-dze,
devised by him to serve his purpose in setting forth the teaching of Lâo-dze.
It may have been so, but the value of the Book would hardly be thereby affected.

Lû Shû-kih gives the following very brief account of the contents.
Borrowing the language of Mencius concerning Yen Hui and two other disciples
of Confucius as compared with the sage, he says, 'Käng-sang Khû had all
the members of Lâo-dze, but in small proportions. To outward appearance he was
above such as abjure sagehood and put knowledge away, but still he was unable
to transform Nan-yung Khû, whom therefore he sent to Lâo-dze; and he announced
to him the doctrine of the Tâo that everything was done by doing nothing.'

The reader will see that this is a very incomplete summary of the contents
of the Book. We find in it the Tâoistic ideal of the 'Perfect Man,' and the
discipline both of body and mind through the depths of the system by means of
which it is possible for a disciple to become such.

BOOK XXIV. HSÜ WÛ-KWEI.

This Book is named from the first three characters in it, the surname and name
of Hsü Wû-kwei, who plays the most important part in the first two paragraphs,
and does not further appear. He comes before us as a well-known recluse of Wei,
who visits the court to offer his counsels to the marquis of the state. But
whether there ever was such

{p. 154}

a man, or whether he was only a creation of Kwang-dze, we cannot, so far as
I know, tell.

Scattered throughout the Book are the lessons so common with our author against
sagehood and knowledge, and on the quality of doing nothing and thereby securing
the doing of everything. The concluding chapter is one of the finest descriptions
in the whole Work of the Tâo and of the Tâoistic idea of Heaven. 'There are
in the Book,' says Lû Fang, 'many dark and mysterious expressions. It
is not to be read hastily; but the more it is studied, the more flavour will
there be found in it.'

BOOK XXV. ZEH-YANG.

This Book is named from the first two characters in it, 'Zeh-yang,' which again
are the designation of a gentleman of Lû, called Phäng Yang, who comes
before us in Khû, seeking for an introduction to the king of that state,
with the view, we may suppose, of giving him good counsel. Whether he ever got
the introduction which he desired we do not know. The mention of him only serves
to bring in three other individuals, all belonging to Khû, and the characters
of two of them; but we hear no more of Zeh-yang. The second and third paragraphs
are, probably, sequels to the first, but his name does not appear.

The paragraphs from 4 to 9 have more or less interest in themselves; but it
is not easy to trace in them any sequence of thought. The tenth and eleventh
are more important. The former deals with 'the Talk of the Hamlets and Villages,'
the common sentiments of men, which, correct and just in themselves, are not
to be accepted as a sufficient expression of the Tâo; the latter sets forth
how the name Tâo itself is only a metaphorical term, used for the purpose of
description; as if the Tâo were a thing, and not capable, therefore, from its
material derivation of giving adequate expression to our highest notion of what
it is.

'The Book,' says Lû Shû-kih, 'illustrates how the Great Tâo cannot
be described by any name; that men ought to

{p. 155}

stop where they do not really know, and not try to find it in any phenomenon,
or in any event or thing. They must forget both speech and silence, and then
they may approximate to the idea of the Great Tâo.'

BOOK XXVI. WÂI WÛ.

The first two characters of the first paragraph are again adopted as the title
of the Book,--Wâi Wû, 'External Things;' and the lesson supposed to be
taught in it is that expressed in the first sentence, that the influence of
external things on character and condition cannot be determined beforehand.
It may be good, it may be evil. Mr. Balfour has translated the two characters
by 'External Advantages.' Hû Wän-ying interprets them of 'External Disadvantages.'
The things may in fact be either of these. What seems useless may be productive
of the greatest services; and what men deem most advantageous may turn out to
be most hurtful to them.

What really belongs to man is the Tâo. That is his own, sufficient for his
happiness, and cannot be taken from him, if he prize it and cultivate it. But
if he neglect it, and yield to external influences unfavourable to it, he may
become bad, and suffer all that is most hateful to him and injurious.

Readers must judge for themselves of the way in which the subject is illustrated
in the various paragraphs. Some of the stories are pertinent enough; others
are wide of the mark. The second, third, and fourth paragraphs are generally
held to be spurious, 'poor in composition, and not at all to the point.' If
my note on the 'six faculties of perception' in par. 9 be correct, we must admit
in it a Buddhistic hand, modifying the conceptions of Kwang-dze after he had
passed away.

BOOK XXVII. YÜ YEN.

Yü Yen, 'Metaphorical Words,' stand at the commencement of the Book, and have
been adopted as its name.

{p. 156}

They might be employed to denote its first paragraph, but are not applicable
to the Book as a whole. Nor let the reader expect to find even here any disquisition
on the nature of the metaphor as a figure of speech. Translated literally, 'Yü
Yen' are 'Lodged Words,' that is, Ideas that receive their meaning or character
from their environment, the narrative or description in which they are deposited.

Kwang-dze wished, I suppose, to give some description of the style in which
he himself wrote:-now metaphorical, now abounding in quotations, and throughout
moulded by his Tâoistic views. This last seems to be the meaning of his Kih
Yen,--literally, 'Cup, or Goblet, Words,' that is, words, common as the water
constantly supplied in the cup, but all moulded by the Tâoist principle, the
element of and from Heaven blended in man's constitution and that should direct
and guide his conduct. The best help in the interpretation of the paragraph
is derived from a study of the difficult second Book, as suggested in the notes.

Of the five paragraphs that follow the first, the second relates to the change
of views, which, it is said, took place in Confucius; the third, to the change
of feeling in Zäng-dze in his poverty and prosperity; the fourth, to changes
of character produced in his disciple by the teachings of Tung-kwo Dze-khî;
the fifth, to the changes in the appearance of the shadow produced by the ever-changing
substance; and the sixth, to the change of spirit and manner produced in Yang
Kû by the stern lesson of Lâo-dze.

Various other lessons, more or less appropriate and important, are interspersed.

Some critics argue that this Book must have originally been one with the thirty-second,
which was made into two by the insertion between its Parts of the four spurious
intervening Books, but this is uncertain and unlikely.

BOOK XXVIII. ZANG WANG.

Zang Wang, explaining the characters as I have done,

{p. 157}

fairly indicates the subject-matter of the Book. Not that we have a king in
every illustration, but the personages adduced are always men of worth, who
decline the throne, or gift, or distinction of whatever nature, proffered to
them, and feel that they have something better to live for.

A persuasion, however, is widely spread, that this Book and the three that
follow are all spurious. The first critic of note to challenge their genuineness
was Sû Shih (better known as Sû Tung-pho, A. D. 1046-1101); and
now, some of the best editors, such as Lin Hsî-kung, do not admit them into
their texts, while others who are not bold enough to exclude them altogether,
do not think it worth their while to discuss them seriously. Hû Wän-ying,
for instance, says, 'Their style is poor and mean, and they are, without doubt,
forgeries. I will not therefore trouble myself with comments of praise or blame
upon them. The reader may accept or reject them at his pleasure.'

But something may be said for them. Sze-mâ Khien seems to have been acquainted
with them all. In his short biographical notice of Kwang-dze, he says, 'He made
the Old Fisherman, the Robber Kih, and the Cutting Open Satchels, to defame
and calumniate the disciples of Confucius.' Khien does not indeed mention our
present Book along with XXX and XXXI, but it is less open to objection on the
ground he mentions than they are. I think if it had stood alone, it would not
have been condemned.

BOOK XXIX. TÂO KIH.

It has been seen above that Sze-mâ Khien expressly ascribes the Book called
'the Robber Kih' to Kwang-dze. Khien refers also in another place to Kih, adducing
the facts of his history in contrast with those about Confucius' favourite disciple
Yen Hui as inexplicable on the supposition of a just and wise Providence. We
must conclude therefore that the Book existed in Khien's time, and that he had
read it. On the other hand it has been shown that Confucius could not have been
on terms

{p. 158}

of friendship with Liû-hsiâ Kî, and all that is related of his brother
the robber wants substantiation. That such a man ever existed appears to me
very doubtful. Are we to put down the whole of the first paragraph then as a
jeu d'esprit on the part of Kwang-dze, intended to throw ridicule on Confucius
and what our author considered his pedantic ways? It certainly does so, and
we are amused to hear the sage outcrowed by the robber.

In the other two paragraphs we have good instances of Kwang-dze's 'metaphorical
expressions,' his coinage of names for his personages, more or less ingeniously
indicating their characters; but in such cases the element of time or chronology
does not enter; and it is the anachronism of the first paragraph which constitutes
its chief difficulty.

The name of 'Robber Kih' may be said to be a coinage; and that a famous robber
was popularly indicated by the name appears from its use by Mencius (III, ii,
ch. 10, 3), to explain which the commentators have invented the story of a robber
so-called in the time of Hwang-Tî, in the twenty-seventh century B. C.! Was
there really such a legend? and did Kwang-dze take advantage of it to apply
the name to a notorious and disreputable brother of Liû-hsiâ Kî? Still
there remain the anachronisms in the paragraph which have been pointed out.
On the whole we must come to a conclusion rather unfavourable to the genuineness
of the Book. But it must have been forged at a very early time, and we have
no idea by whom.

BOOK XXX. YÜEH KIEN.

We need not suppose that anything ever occurred in Kwang-dze's experience such
as is described here. The whole narrative is metaphorical; and that he himself
is made to play the part in it which he describes, only shows how the style
of writing in which he indulged was ingrained into the texture of his mind.
We do not know that there ever was a ruler of Kâo who indulged in the love of
the

{p. 159}

sword-fight, and kept about him a crowd of vulgar bravoes such as the story
describes. We may be assured that our author never wore the bravo's dress or
girt on him the bravo's sword. The whole is a metaphorical representation of
the way in which a besotted ruler might be brought to a feeling of his degradation,
and recalled to a sense of his duty and the way in which he might fulfil it.
The narrative is full of interest and force. I do not feel any great difficulty
in accepting it as the genuine composition of Kwang-dze. Who but himself could
have composed it? Was it a good-humoured caricature of him by an able Confucian
writer to repay him for the ridicule he was fond of casting on the sage?

BOOK XXXI. YÜ-FÛ.

'The Old Fisherman' is the fourth of the Books in the collection of the writings
of Kwang-dze to which, since the time of Sû Shih, the epithet of 'spurious'
has been attached by many. My own opinion, however, has been already intimated
that the suspicions of the genuineness of those Books have been entertained
on insufficient grounds; and so far as 'the Old Fisherman' is concerned, I am
glad that it has come down to us, spurious or genuine. There may be a certain
coarseness in 'the Robber Kih,' which makes us despise Confucius or laugh at
him; but the satire in this Book is delicate, and we do not like the sage the
less when he walks up the bank from the stream where he has been lectured by
the fisherman. The pictures of him and his disciples in the forest, reading
and singing on the Apricot Terrace, and of the old man slowly impelling his
skiff to the land and then as quietly impelling it away till it is lost among
the reeds, are delicious; there is nothing finer of its kind in the volume.
What hand but that of Kwang-dze, so light in its touch and yet so strong, both
incisive and decisive, could have delineated them?

{p. 160}

BOOK XXXII. LIEH YÜ-KHÂU.

Lieh Yü-khâu, the surname and name of Lieh-dze, with which the first paragraph
commences, have become current as the name of the Book, though they have nothing
to do with any but that one paragraph, which is found also in the second Book
of the writings ascribed to Lieh-dze. There are some variations in the two Texts,
but they are so slight that we cannot look on them as proofs that the two passages
are narratives of independent origin.

Various difficulties surround the questions of the existence of Lieh-dze, and
of the work which bears his name. They will be found distinctly and dispassionately
stated and discussed in the 146th chapter of the Catalogue of the Khien-lung
Imperial Library. The writers seem to me to make it out that there was such
a man, but they do not make it clear when he lived, or how his writings assumed
their present form. There is a statement of Liû Hsiang that he lived in
the time of duke Ma of Käng (B.C. 627-606); but in that case he must have been
earlier than Lâo-dze himself, whom he very frequently quotes. The writers think
that Lift's 'Mû of Käng' should be Mû of Lû (B.C. 409-377),
which would make him not much anterior to Mencius and Kwang-dze; but this is
merely an ingenious conjecture. As to the composition of his chapters, they
are evidently not at first hand from Lieh, but by some one of his disciples;
whether they were current in Kwang-dze's days, and be made use of various passages
from them, or those passages were Kwang-dze's originally, and taken from him
by the followers of Lieh-dze and added to what fragments they had of their master's
teaching;--these are points which must be left undetermined.

Whether the narrative about Lieh be from Kwang-dze or not, its bearing on his
character is not readily apprehended; but, as we study it, we seem to understand
that his master Wû-zän condemned him as not having fully attained to the
Tâo, but owing his influence with others

{p. 161}

mainly to the manifestation of his merely human qualities. And this is the
lesson which our author keeps before him, more or less distinctly, in all his
paragraphs. As Lû Shû-kih. says:--

'This Book also sets forth Doing Nothing as the essential condition of the
Tâo. Lieh-dze, frightened at the respect shown to him by the soup-vendors, and
yet by his human doings drawing men to him, disowns the rule of the heavenly;
Hwan of Käng, thinking himself different from other men, does not know that
Heaven recompenses men according to their employment of the heavenly in them;
the resting of the sages in their proper rest shows how the ancients pursued
the heavenly and not the human; the one who learned to slay the Dragon, but
afterwards did not exercise his skill, begins with the human, but afterwards
goes on to the heavenly; in those who do not rest in the heavenly, and perish
by the inward war, we see how the small men do not know the secret of the Great
Repose; Zhâo Shang, glorying in the carriages which he had acquired, is still
farther removed from the heavenly; when Yen Ho shows that the sage, in imparting
his instructions, did not follow the example of Heaven in diffusing its benefits,
we learn that it is only the Doing Nothing of the True Man which is in agreement
with Heaven; the difficulty of knowing the mind of man, and the various methods
required to test it, show the readiness with which, when not under the rule
of Heaven, it seems to go after what is right, and the greater readiness with
which it again revolts from it; in Khao-fû, the Correct, we have one indifferent
to the distinctions of rank, and from him we advance to the man who understands
the great condition appointed for him, and is a follower of Heaven; then comes
he who plays the thief under the chin of the Black Dragon, running the greatest
risks on a mere peradventure of success, a resolute opponent of Heaven; and
finally we have Kwang-dze despising the ornaments of the sacrificial ox, looking
in the same way at the worms beneath and the kites overhead, and regarding himself
as quite independent

{p. 162}

of them, thus giving us an example of the embodiment of the spiritual, and
of harmony with Heaven.'

So does this ingenious commentator endeavour to exhibit the one idea in the
Book, and show the unity of its different paragraphs.

BOOK XXXIII. THIEN HSIÂ.

The Thien Hsiâ with which this Book commences is in regimen, and cannot be
translated, so as to give an adequate idea of the scope of the Book, or even
of the first paragraph to which it belongs. The phrase itself means literally
'under heaven or the sky,' and is used as a denomination of 'the kingdom,' and,
even more widely, of the world' or 'all men.' 'Historical Phases of Tâoist Teaching'
would be nearly descriptive of the subject-matter of the Book; but may be objected
to on two grounds:--first, that a chronological method is not observed, and
next, that the concluding paragraph can hardly be said to relate to Tâoism at
all, but to the sophistical teachers, which abounded in the age of Kwang-dze.

Par. 1 sketches with a light hand the nature of Tâoism and the forms which
it assumed from the earliest times to the era of Confucius, as imperfectly represented
by him and his school.

Par. 2 introduces us to the system of Mo Tî and his school as an erroneous
form of Tâoism, and departing, as it continued, farther and farther from the
old model.

Par. 3 deals with a modification of Mohism, advocated by scholars who are hardly
heard of elsewhere.

Par. 4 treats of a further modification of this modified Mohism, held by scholars
'whose Tâo was not the true Tâo, and whose "right" was really "wrong."'

Par. 5 goes back to the era of Lâo-dze, and mentions him and Kwan Yin, as the
men who gave to the system of Tâo a grand development.

Par. 6 sets forth Kwang-dze as following in their steps and going beyond them,
the brightest luminary of the system.

{p. 163}

Par. 7 leaves Tâoism, and brings up Hui Shih and other sophists.

Whether the Book should be received as from Kwang-dze himself or from some
early editor of his writings is 'a vexed question.' If it did come from his
pencil, he certainly had a good opinion of himself. It is hard for a foreign
student at this distant time to be called on for an opinion on the one side
or the other.

THE

WRITINGS OF KWANG-DZE.

BOOK I.

PART I. SECTION I.

Hsiâo-yâo Yû, or 'Enjoyment in Untroubled Ease[1].'

1. In the Northern Ocean there is a fish, the name of which is Khwän[2],--I
do not know how many lî in size. It changes into a bird with the name of Phing,
the back of which is (also)--I do not know how many lî in extent. When this
bird rouses itself and flies, its wings are like clouds all round the sky. When
the sea is moved (so as to bear it along), it prepares to remove to the Southern
Ocean. The Southern Ocean is the Pool of Heaven.

[1. See notice on pp. 127, 128, on the Title and Subject-matter
of the Book.

2. The khwän and the phäng are both fabulous creatures, far
transcending in size the dimensions ascribed by the wildest fancy of the West
to the kraken and the roc. Kwang-dze represents them as so huge by way of contrast
to the small creatures which he is intending to introduce;--to show that size
has nothing to do with the Tâo, and the perfect enjoyment which the possession
of it affords. The passage is a good specimen of the Yü Yen (###) metaphorical
or parabolical narratives or stories, which are the chief characteristic of
our author's writings; but the reader must keep in mind that the idea or lesson
in its 'lodging' is generally of a Tâoistic nature.]

{p. 165}

There is the (book called) Khî Hsieh[1],--a record of marvels. We have in it
these words:--'When the phäng is removing to the Southern Ocean it flaps (its
wings) on the water for 3000 lî. Then it ascends on a whirlwind 90,000 lî, and
it rests only at the end of six months.' (But similar to this is the movement
of the breezes which we call) the horses of the fields, of the dust (which quivers
in the sunbeams), and of living things as they are blown against one another
by the air[2]. Is its azure the proper colour of the sky? Or is it occasioned
by its distance and illimitable extent? If one were looking down (from above),
the very same appearance would just meet his view.

2. And moreover, (to speak of) the accumulation of water;--if it be not great,
it will not have strength to support a large boat. Upset a cup of water in a
cavity, and a straw will float on it as if it were a boat. Place a cup in it,
and it will stick fast;--the water is shallow and the boat is large. (So it
is with) the accumulation of wind; if it be not great, it will not have strength
to support great wings. Therefore (the phäng ascended to) the height of 90,000
lî, and there was such a mass of wind beneath it; thenceforth the accumulation
of wind was sufficient. As it seemed to bear the blue sky on its back, and there
was nothing to obstruct or arrest its course, it could pursue its way to the
South.

[1. There may have been a book with this title, to which Kwang-dze
appeals, as if feeling that what he had said needed to be substantiated.

2. This seems to be interjected as an afterthought, suggesting
to the reader that the phäng, soaring along at such a height, was only an exaggerated
form of the common phenomena with which he was familiar.]

{p. 166}

A cicada and a little dove laughed at it, saying, 'We make an effort and fly
towards an elm or sapan-wood tree; and sometimes before we reach it, we can
do no more but drop to the ground. Of what use is it for this (creature) to
rise 90,000 lî, and make for the South?' He who goes to the grassy suburbs[1],
returning to the third meal (of the day), will have his belly as full as when
he set out; he who goes to a distance of 100 lî will have to pound his grain
where he stops for the night; he who goes a thousand lî, will have to carry
with him provisions for three months. What should these two small creatures
know about the matter? The knowledge of that which is small does not reach to
that which is great; (the experience of) a few years does not reach to that
of many. How do we know that it is so? The mushroom of a morning does not know
(what takes place between) the beginning and end of a month; the short-lived
cicada does not know (what takes place between) the spring and autumn. These
are instances of a short term of life. In the south of Khû[2], there is
the (tree) called Ming-ling[3], whose spring is 500 years, and its autumn the
same; in high antiquity there was that called Tâ-khun[4],

[1. In Chinese, Mang Zhan; but this is not the name of any particular
place. The phrase denotes the grassy suburbs (from their green colour), not
far from any city or town.

2. The great state of the South, having its capital Ying in
the present Hû-pei, and afterwards the chief competitor with Khin for
the sovereignty of the kingdom.

3. Taken by some as the name of a tortoise.

4. This and the Ming-ling tree, as well as the mushroom mentioned
above, together with the khwän and phäng, are all mentioned in the fifth Book
of the writings of Lieh-dze, referred to in the next paragraph.]

{p. 167}

whose spring was 8000 years, and its autumn the same. And Phäng Zû[1]
is the one man renowned to the present day for his length of life:--if all men
were (to wish) to match him, would they not be miserable?

3. In the questions put by Thang[2] to Kî we have similar statements:--'In
the bare and barren north there is the dark and vast ocean,--the Pool of Heaven.
In it there is a fish, several thousand lî in breadth, while no one knows its
length. Its name is the khwän. There is (also) a bird named the phäng; its back
is like the Thâi mountain, while its wings are like clouds all round the sky.
On a whirlwind it mounts upwards as on the whorls of a goat's horn for 90,000
lî, till, far removed from the cloudy vapours, it bears on its back the blue
sky, and then it shapes its course for the South, and proceeds to the ocean
there.' A quail by the side of a marsh laughed at it, and said, 'Where is it
going to? I spring up with a bound, and come down again when I have reached
but a few fathoms, and then fly about among the brushwood and bushes; and

[1. Or 'the patriarch Phäng.' Confucius compared himself to
him (Analects, VII, i);-'our old Phäng;' and Kû Hsî thinks he was a worthy
officer of the Shang dynasty. Whoever he was, the legends about him are a mass
of Tâoistic fables. At the end of the Shang dynasty (B. C. 1123) he was more
than 767 years old, and still in unabated vigour. We read of his losing 49 wives
and 54 sons; and that he still left two sons, Wû and Î, who died in Fû-kien,
and gave their names to the Wû-î, or Bû-î hills, from which we get
our Bohea tea! See Mayers' 'Chinese Reader's Manual,' p. 175.

2. The founder of the Shang dynasty (B.C. 1766-1754). In Lieh-dze
his interlocutor is called Hsiâ Ko, and Dze-kî.]

{p. 168}

this is the perfection of flying. Where is that creature going to?' This shows
the difference between the small and the great.

Thus it is that men, whose wisdom is sufficient for the duties of some one
office, or whose conduct will secure harmony in some one district, or whose
virtue is befitting a ruler so that they could efficiently govern some one state,
are sure to look on themselves in this manner (like the quail), and yet Yung-dze[1]
of Sung[1] would have smiled and laughed at them. (This Yung-dze), though the
whole world should have praised him, would not for that have stimulated himself
to greater endeavour, and though the whole world should have condemned him,
would not have exercised any more repression of his course; so fixed was he
in the difference between the internal (judgment of himself) and the external
(judgment of others), so distinctly had he marked out the bounding limit of
glory and disgrace. Here, however, he stopped. His place in the world indeed
had become indifferent to him, but still he had not planted himself firmly (in
the right position).

There was Lieh-dze[2], who rode on the wind and pursued his way, with an admirable
indifference (to

[1. We can hardly tell who this Yung-dze was. Sung was a duchy,
comprehending portions of the present provinces of Ho-nan, An-hui, and Kiang-sû.

2. See note on the title of Book XXXII. Whether there ever was
a personage called Lieh-dze or Lieh Yü-khâu, and what is the real character
of the writings that go under his name, are questions that cannot be more than
thus alluded to in a note. He is often introduced by Kwang-dze, and many narratives
are common to their books. Here he comes before us, not as a thinker and writer,
but as a semi-supernatural being, who has only not yet attained to the highest
consummations of the Tâo.]

{p. 169}

all external things), returning, however, after fifteen days, (to his place).
In regard to the things that (are supposed to) contribute to happiness, he was
free from all endeavours to obtain them; but though he had not to walk, there
was still something for which he had to wait. But suppose one who mounts on
(the ether of) heaven and earth in its normal operation, and drives along the
six elemental energies of the changing (seasons), thus enjoying himself in the
illimitable,--what has he to wait for'? Therefore it is said, 'The Perfect man
has no (thought of) self; the Spirit-like man, none of merit; the Sagely-minded
man, none of fame[1].'

4. Yâo[2], proposing to resign the throne to Hsü Yû[3], said, 'When the
sun and moon have come forth, if the torches have not been put out, would it
not be difficult for them to give light? When the seasonal rains are coming
down, if we still keep watering the ground, will not our toil be labour lost
for all the good it will do? Do you, Master, stand forth (as sovereign), and
the kingdom will (at once) be well governed. If I still (continue to) preside
over it, I must look on myself as vainly occupying the place;--I beg to resign
the throne to you.' Hsü

[1. The description of a master of the Tâo, exalted by it, unless
the predicates about him be nothing but the ravings of a wild extravagance,
above mere mortal man. In the conclusion, however, he is presented under three
different phrases, which the reader will do well to keep in mind.

2. The great sovereign with whom the documents of the Shû
King commence:--B. C. 2357-2257.

3. A counsellor of Yâo, who is once mentioned by Sze-ma Khien
in his account of Po-î,--in the first Book of his Biographies (###). Hsü Yû
is here the instance of 'the Sagely man,' with whom the desire of a name or
fame has no influence.]

{p. 170}

Yû said, 'You, Sir, govern the kingdom, and the kingdom is well governed.
If I in these circumstances take your place, shall I not be doing so for the
sake of the name? But the name is but the guest of the reality;--shall I be
playing the part of the guest? The tailor-bird makes its nest in the deep forest,
but only uses a single branch; the mole[1] drinks from the Ho, but only takes
what fills its belly. Return and rest in being ruler,--I will have nothing to
do with the throne. Though the cook were not attending to his kitchen, the representative
of the dead and the officer of prayer would not leave their cups and stands
to take his place.'

5. Kien Wû[2] asked Lien Shû[2], saying, 'I heard Khieh-yû[3]
talking words which were great, but had nothing corresponding to them (in reality);-once
gone, they could not be brought back. I was frightened by them;--they were like
the Milky Way[4] which cannot be traced to its beginning or end. They had no
connexion with one another, and were not akin to the experiences of men.' 'What
were his words?' asked Lien Shift, and the other replied, (He said) that 'Far
away on the hill of Kû-shih[5] there dwelt a Spirit-like man whose flesh
and skin

[1. Some say the tapir.

2. Known to us only through Kwang-dze.

3. 'The madman of Khû' of the Analects, XVIII, 5, who
eschews intercourse with Confucius. See Hwang-fû Mî's account of him,
under the surname and name of Lû Thung, in his Notices of Eminent Tâoists,
1, 25.

4. Literally, 'the Ho and the Han;' but the name of those rivers
combined was used to denote 'the Milky Way.'

5. See the Khang-hsî Thesaurus under the character ###. All
which is said about the hill is that it was 'in the North Sea.']

{p. 171}

were (smooth) as ice and (white) as snow; that his manner was elegant and delicate
as that of a virgin; that he did not eat any of the five grains, but inhaled
the wind and drank the dew; that he mounted on the clouds, drove along the flying
dragons, rambling and enjoying himself beyond the four seas; that by the concentration
of his spirit-like powers he could save men from disease and pestilence, and
secure every year a plentiful harvest.' These words appeared to me wild and
incoherent and I did not believe them. 'So it is,' said Lien Shû. 'The
blind have no perception of the beauty of elegant figures, nor the deaf of the
sound of bells and drums. But is it only the bodily senses of which deafness
and blindness can be predicated? There is also a similar defect in the intelligence;
and of this your words supply an illustration in yourself. That man, with those
attributes, though all things were one mass of confusion, and he heard in that
condition the whole world crying out to him to be rectified, would not have
to address himself laboriously to the task, as if it were his business to rectify
the world. Nothing could hurt that man; the greatest floods, reaching to the
sky, could not drown him, nor would he feel the fervour of the greatest heats
melting metals and stones till they flowed, and scorching all the ground and
hills. From the dust and chaff of himself, he could still mould and fashion
Yâos and Shuns[1];how should he be willing to occupy himself with things[2]?'

[1. Shun was the successor of Yâo, in the ancient kingdom.

2. All this description is to give us an idea of the 'Spirit-like
man.' We have in it the results of the Tâo in its fullest embodiment.]

{p. 172}

6. A man of Sung, who dealt in the ceremonial caps (of Yin)[1], went with them
to Yüeh[2], the people of which cut off their hair and tattooed their bodies,
so that they had no use for them. Yâo ruled the people of the kingdom, and maintained
a perfect government within the four seas. Having gone to see the four (Perfect)
Ones[3] on the distant hill of Kû-shih, when (he returned to his capital)
on the south of the Fän water[4], his throne appeared no more to his deep-sunk
oblivious eyes[5].

7. Hui-dze[6] told Kwang-dze, saying, 'The king of Wei[7] sent me some seeds
of a large calabash, which I sowed. The fruit, when fully grown, could contain
five piculs (of anything). I used it to contain water,

[1. See the Lî Kî, IX, iii, 3.

2. A state, part of the present province of Kieh-kiang.

3. Said to have been Hsü Yû mentioned above, with Nieh
Khüeh, Wang Î, and Phî-î, who will by and by come before us.

4. A river in Shan-hsî, on which was the capital of Yâo;--a
tributary of the Ho.

5. This paragraph is intended to give us an idea of 'the Perfect
man,' who has no thought of himself. The description, however, is brief and
tame, compared with the accounts of Hsü Yû and of the Spirit-like man.'

6. Or Hui Shih, the chief minister of 'king Hui of Liang (or
Wei), (B. C. 370-333),' with an interview between whom and Mencius the works
of that philosopher commence. He was a friend of Kwang-dze, and an eccentric
thinker; and in Book XXXIII there is a long account of several of his views.
I do not think that the conversations about 'the great calabash' and 'the great
tree' really took place; Kwan-dze probably invented them, to illustrate his
point that size had nothing to do with the Tâo, and that things which seemed
useless were not really so when rightly used.

7. Called also Liang from the name of its capital. Wei was one
of the three states (subsequently kingdoms), into which the great fief of Zin
was divided about B. C. 400.]

{p. 173}

but it was so heavy that I could not lift it by myself. I cut it in two to
make the parts into drinking vessels; but the dried shells were too wide and
unstable and would not hold (the liquor); nothing but large useless things!
Because of their uselessness I knocked them to pieces.' Kwang-dze replied, 'You
were indeed stupid, my master, in the use of what was large. There was a man
of Sung who was skilful at making a salve which kept the hands from getting
chapped; and (his family) for generations had made the bleaching of cocoon-silk
their business. A stranger heard of it, and proposed to buy the art of the preparation
for a hundred ounces of silver. The kindred all came together, and considered
the proposal. "We have," said they, "been bleaching cocoon-silk for generations,
and have only gained a little money. Now in one morning we can sell to this
man our art for a hundred ounces;--let him have it." The stranger accordingly
got it and went away with it to give counsel to the king of Wû[1], who
was then engaged in hostilities with Yüeh. The king gave him the command of
his fleet, and in the winter he had an engagement with that of Yüeh, on which
he inflicted a great defeat[2], and was invested with a portion of territory
taken from Yüeh. The keeping the hands from getting chapped was the same in
both cases; but in the one case it led to the investiture (of the possessor
of the salve), and

[1. A great and ancient state on the sea-board, north of Yüeh.
The name remains in the district of Wû-kiang in the prefecture of Sû-kâu.

2 The salve gave the troops of Wû a great advantage in
a war on the Kiang, especially in winter.]

{p. 174}

in the other it had only enabled its owners to continue their bleaching. The
difference of result was owing to the different use made of the art. Now you,
Sir, had calabashes large enough to hold five piculs;--why did you not think
of making large bottle-gourds of them, by means of which you could have floated
over rivers and lakes, instead of giving yourself the sorrow of finding that
they were useless for holding anything. Your mind, my master, would seem to
have been closed against all intelligence!'

Hui-dze said to Kwang-dze, 'I have a large tree, which men call the Ailantus[1].
Its trunk swells out to a large size, but is not fit for a carpenter to apply
his line to it; its smaller branches are knotted and crooked, so that the disk
and square cannot be used on them. Though planted on the wayside, a builder
would not turn his head to look at it. Now your words, Sir, are great, but of
no use;--all unite in putting them away from them.' Kwang-dze replied, 'Have
you never seen a wildcat or a weasel? There it lies, crouching and low, till
the wanderer approaches; east and west it leaps about, avoiding neither what
is high nor what is low, till it is caught in a trap, or dies in a net. Again
there is the Yak[2], so large that it is like a cloud hanging in the sky. It
is large indeed, but it cannot catch mice. You, Sir, have a large tree and are
troubled because it is of no use;--why do you not plant it in a tract where
there is nothing else, or in a wide and barren wild?

[1. The Ailantus glandulosa, common in the north of China, called
'the fetid tree,' from the odour of its leaves.

2. The bos grunniens of Thibet, the long tail of which is in
great demand for making standards and chowries.]

{p. 175}

There you might saunter idly by its side, or in the enjoyment of untroubled
case sleep beneath it. Neither bill nor axe would shorten its existence; there
would be nothing to injure it. What is there in its uselessness to cause you
distress?'

BOOK II.

PART I. SECTION II.

Khî Wû Lun, or 'The Adjustment of Controversies[1].'

1. Nan-kwo Sze-khî[2] was seated, leaning forward on his stool. He was looking
up to heaven and breathed gently, seeming to be in a trance, and to have lost
all consciousness of any companion. (His disciple), Yen Khäng Dze-yû[3],
who was in attendance and standing before him, said, 'What is this? Can the
body be made to become thus like a withered tree, and the mind to become like
slaked lime? His appearance as he leans forward on the stool to-day is such
as I never saw him have before in the same position.' Dze-khî said, 'Yen, you
do well to ask such a question, I had just now lost myself[4]; but how should
you understand it? You

[1. See pp. 128-130.

2. Nan-kwo, 'the southern suburb,' had probably been the quarter
where Dze-khî had resided, and is used as his surname. He is introduced several
times by Kwang-dze in his writings:--Books IV, 7; XXVII, 4, and perhaps elsewhere.

3 We have the surname of this disciple, Yen (###); his name,
Yen (###); his honorary or posthumous epithet (Khäng); and his ordinary appellation,
Dze-yû. The use of the epithet shows that he and his master had lived
before our author.

4, 'He had lost himself;' that is, he had become unconscious
of all around him, and even of himself, as if he were about to enter {footnote
p. 177} into the state of Ian Immortal,' a mild form of the Buddhistic samâdhi.
But his attitude and appearance were intended by Kwang-dze to indicate what
should be the mental condition in reference to the inquiry pursued in the Book;--a
condition, it appears to me, of agnosticism. See the account of Lâo-dze in a
similar trance in Book XXI, par. 4.]

{p. 177}

may have heard the notes[1] of Man, but have not heard those of Earth; you
may have heard the notes of Earth, but have not heard those of Heaven.'

Dze-yû said, 'I venture to ask from you a description of all these.'
The reply was, 'When the breath of the Great Mass (of nature) comes strongly,
it is called Wind. Sometimes it does not come so; but when it does, then from
a myriad apertures there issues its excited noise;--have you not heard it in
a prolonged gale? Take the projecting bluff of a mountain forest;--in the great
trees, a hundred spans round, the apertures and cavities are like the nostrils,
or the mouth, or the ears; now square, now round like a cup or a mortar; here
like a wet footprint, and there like a large puddle. (The sounds issuing from
them are like) those of fretted water, of the arrowy whizz, of the stern command,
of the inhaling of the breath, of the shout, of the gruff note, of the deep
wail, of the sad and piping note. The first notes are slight, and those that
follow deeper, but in harmony with them. Gentle winds produce a small response;
violent winds a great one. When the fierce gusts have passed away, all the apertures

[1. The Chinese term here (lâi) denotes a reed or pipe, with
three holes, by a combination of which there was formed the rudimentary or reed
organ. Our author uses it for the sounds or notes heard in nature, various as
the various opinions of men in their discussions about things.]

{p. 178}

are empty (and still);--have you not seen this in the bending and quivering
of the branches and leaves?'

Dze-yû said, 'The notes of Earth then are simply those which come from
its myriad apertures; and the notes of Man may just be compared to those which
(are brought from the tubes of) bamboo;--allow me to ask about the notes of
Heaven[1].' Dze-khî replied, 'When (the wind) blows, (the sounds from) the myriad
apertures are different, and (its cessation) makes them stop of themselves.
Both of these things arise from (the wind and the apertures) themselves:--should
there be any other agency that excites them?'

2. Great knowledge is wide and comprehensive; small knowledge is partial and
restricted. Great speech is exact and complete; small speech is (merely) so
much talk[2]. When we sleep, the soul communicates with (what is external to
us); when we awake, the body is set free. Our intercourse with others then leads
to various activity, and daily there is the striving of mind with mind. There
are hesitancies; deep difficulties; reservations; small apprehensions causing
restless distress, and great

[1. The sounds of Earth have been described fully and graphically.
Of the sounds of Man very little is said, but they form the subject of the next
paragraph. Nothing is said in answer to the disciple's inquiry about the notes
of Heaven. It is intimated, however, that there is no necessity to introduce
any foreign Influence or Power like Heaven in connexion. with the notes of Earth.
The term Heaven, indeed, is about to pass with our author into a mere synonym
of Tâo, the natural 'course' of the phenomena of men and things.

2. Words are the 'sounds' of Man; and knowledge is the 'wind'
by which they are excited.]

{p. 179}

apprehensions producing endless fears. Where their utterances are like arrows
from a bow, we have those who feel it their charge to pronounce what is right
and what is wrong.; where they are given out like the conditions of a covenant,
we have those who maintain their views, determined to overcome. (The weakness
of their arguments), like the decay (of things) in autumn and winter, shows
the failing (of the minds of some) from day to day; or it is like their water
which, once voided, cannot be gathered up again. Then their ideas seem as if
fast bound with cords, showing that the mind is become like an old and dry moat,
and that it is nigh to death, and cannot be restored to vigour and brightness.

Joy and anger, sadness and pleasure, anticipation and regret, fickleness and
fixedness, vehemence and indolence, eagerness and tardiness;--(all these moods),
like music from an empty tube, or mushrooms from the warm moisture, day and
night succeed to one another and come before us, and we do not know whence they
sprout. Let us stop! Let us stop! Can we expect to find out suddenly how they
are produced?

If there were not (the views of) another, I should not have mine; if there
were not I (with my views), his would be uncalled for:--this is nearly a true,
statement of the case, but we do not know what it is that makes it be so. It
might seem as if there would be a true Governor[1] concerned in it, but we do
not find

[1. A true Governor' would be a good enough translation for
'the true God.' But Kwang-dze did not admit any supernatural Power or Being
as working in man. His true Governor was the Tâo; and this will be increasingly
evident as we proceed with the study of his Books.]

{p. 180}

any trace (of his presence and acting). That such an One could act so I believe;
but we do not see His form. He has affections, but He has no form.

Given the body, with its hundred parts, its nine openings, and its six viscera,
all complete in their places, which do I love the most? Do you love them all
equally? or do you love some more than others? Is it not the case that they
all perform the part of your servants and waiting women? All of them being such,
are they not incompetent to rule one another? or do they take it in turns to
be now ruler and now servants? There must be a true Ruler (among them)[1] whether
by searching you can find out His character or not, there is neither advantage
nor hurt, so far as the truth of His operation is concerned. When once we have
received the bodily form complete, its parts do not fail to perform their functions
till the end comes. In conflict with things or in harmony with them, they pursue
their course to the end, with the speed of a galloping horse which cannot be
stopped;--is it not sad? To be constantly toiling all one's lifetime, without
seeing the fruit of one's labour, and to be weary and worn out with his labour,
without knowing where he is going to:-is it not a deplorable case? Men may say,
'But it is not death;' yet of what advantage is this? When the body is decomposed,
the mind will be the same along with it:--must not the case be pronounced very
deplorable[2]? Is the life

[1. The name 'Ruler' is different from 'Governor' above; but
they both indicate the same concept in the author's mind.

2. The proper reply to this would be that the mind is not dissolved
with the body; and Kwang-dze's real opinion, as we shall find, was that life
and death were but phases in the phenomenal development. But the course of his
argument suggests to us the question here, 'Is life worth living?']

{p. 181}

of man indeed enveloped in such darkness? Is it I alone to whom it appears
so? And does it not appear to be so to other men?

3. If we were to follow the judgments of the predetermined mind, who would
be left alone and without a teacher[1]? Not only would it be so with those who
know the sequences (of knowledge and feeling) and make their own selection among
them, but it would be so as well with the stupid and unthinking. For one who
has not this determined mind, to have his affirmations and negations is like
the case described in the saying, 'He went to Yüeh to-day, and arrived at it
yesterday[2].' It would be making what was not a fact to be a fact. But even
the spirit-like Yü[3] could not have known how to do this, and how should one
like me be able to do it?

But speech is not like the blowing (of the wind) the speaker has (a meaning
in) his words. If, however, what he says, be indeterminate (as from a mind not
made up), does he then really speak or not? He thinks that his words are different
from the chirpings of fledgelings; but is there any distinction between them
or not? But how can the Tâo be so obscured, that there should be 'a True' and
'a False' in it? How can speech be so obscured that there should be 'the Right'
and 'the Wrong' about them? Where shall the Tâo go to that it will not

[1. This 'teacher' is 'the Tâo.'

2. Expressing the absurdity of the case. This is one of the
sayings of Hui-dze;--see Book XXXIII, par. 7.

3 The successor and counsellor of Shun, who coped with and remedied
the flood of Yâo.]

{p. 182}

be found? Where shall speech be found that it will be inappropriate? Tâo becomes
obscured through the small comprehension (of the mind), and speech comes to
be obscure through the vain-gloriousness (of the speaker). So it is that we
have the contentions between the Literati[1] and the Mohists[2], the one side
affirming what the other denies, and vice versâ. If we would decide on their
several affirmations and denials, no plan is like bringing the (proper) light
(of the mind)[3] to bear on them.

All subjects may be looked at from (two points of view),--from that and from
this. If I look at a thing from another's point of view, I do not see it; only
as I know it myself, do I know it. Hence it is said, 'That view comes from this;
and this view is a consequence of that:'--which is the theory that that view
and this--(the opposite views)-produce each the other[4]. Although it be so,
there is affirmed now life and now death; now death and now life; now the admissibility
of a thing and now its inadmissibility; now its inadmissibility and now its
admissibility. (The disputants) now affirm and now deny; now deny and now affirm.
Therefore the sagely man does not pursue this method, but views things in the
light of (his) Heaven[5] (-ly nature), and hence forms his judgment of what
is right.

[1. The followers of Confucius.

2. The disciples of Mih-dze, or Mih Tî, the heresiarch, whom
Mencius attacked so fiercely;--see Mencius, V, 1, 5, e t al. His era must be
assigned between Confucius and Mencius.

3 That is, the perfect mind, the principle of the Tâo.

4. As taught by Hui-dze;--see XXXIII, 7; but it is doubtful
if the quotation from Hui's teaching be complete.

5. Equivalent to the Tâo. See on the use in Lâo-dze and Kwang-dze
of the term 'Heaven,' in the Introduction, pp. 16-18.]

{p. 183}

This view is the same as that, and that view is the same as this. But that
view involves both a right and a wrong; and this view involves also a right
and a wrong:--are there indeed, or are there not the two views, that and this?
They have not found their point of correspondency which is called the pivot
of the Tâo. As soon as one finds this pivot, he stands in the centre of the
ring (of thought), where he can respond without end to the changing views;--without
end to those affirming, and without end to those denying. Therefore I said,
'There is nothing like the proper light (of the mind).'

4. By means of a finger (of my own) to illustrate that the finger (of another)
is not a finger is not so good a plan as to illustrate that it is not so by
means of what is (acknowledged to be) not a finger; and by means of (what I
call) a horse to illustrate that (what another calls) a horse is not so, is
not so good a plan as to illustrate that it is not a horse, by means of what
is (acknowledged to be) not a horse[1]. (All things in) heaven and earth may
be (dealt with as) a finger; (each of) their myriads may be (dealt with as)
a horse. Does a thing seem so to me? (I say that) it is so. Does it seem not
so to me? (I say that) it is not so. A path is formed by (constant)

[1. The language of our author here is understood to have reference
to the views of Kung-sun Lung, a contemporary of Hui-dze, and a sophist like
him. One of his treatises or arguments had the title of 'The White Horse,' and
another that of 'Pointing to Things.' If these had been preserved, we might
have seen more clearly the appropriateness of the text here. But the illustration
of the monkeys and their actions shows us the scope of the whole paragraph to
be that controversialists, whose views are substantially the same, may yet differ,
and that with heat, in words.]

{p. 184}

treading on the ground. A thing is called by its name through the (constant)
application of the name to it. How is it so? It is so because it is so. How
is it not so? It is not so, because it is not so. Everything has its inherent
character and its proper capability. There is nothing which has not these. Therefore,
this being so, if we take a stalk of grain[1] and a (large) pillar, a loathsome
(leper) and (a beauty like) Hsî Shih[2], things large and things insecure, things
crafty and things strange;--they may in the light of the Tâo all be reduced
to the same category (of opinion about them).

It was separation that led to completion; from completion ensued dissolution.
But all things, without regard to their completion and dissolution, may again
be comprehended in their unity;--it is only the far reaching in thought who
know how to comprehend them in this unity. This being so, let us give up our
devotion to our own views, and occupy ourselves with the ordinary views. These
ordinary views are grounded on the use of things. (The study of that) use leads
to the comprehensive judgment, and that judgment secures the success (of the
inquiry). That success gained, we are near (to the object of our search), and
there we stop. When we stop, and yet we do not know how it is so, we have what
is called the Tâo.

When we toil our spirits and intelligence, obstinately

[1. The character in the text means both 'a stalk of grain'
and a horizontal beam.' Each meaning has its advocates here.

2. A famous beauty, a courtezan presented by the king of Yüeh
to his enemy, the king of Wû, and who hastened on his progress to ruin
and death, she herself perishing at the same time.]

{p. 185}

determined (to establish our own view), and do not know the agreement (which
underlies it and the views of others), we have what is called 'In the morning
three.' What is meant by that 'In the morning three?' A keeper of monkeys, in
giving them out their acorns, (once) said, 'In the morning I will give you three
(measures) and in the evening four.' This made them all angry, and he said,
'Very well. In the morning I will give you four and in the evening three.' His
two proposals were substantially the same, but the result of the one was to
make the creatures angry, and of the other to make them pleased:--an illustration
of the point I am insisting on. Therefore the sagely man brings together a dispute
in its affirmations and denials, and rests in the equal fashioning of Heaven[1].
Both sides of the question are admissible.

5. Among the men of old their knowledge reached the extreme point. What was
that extreme point? Some held that at first there was not anything. This is
the extreme point, the utmost point to which nothing can be added[2]. A second
class held that there was something, but without any responsive recognition[3]
of it (on the part of men).

A third class held that there was such recognition, but there had not begun
to be any expression of different opinions about it.

[1. Literally, 'the Heaven-Mould or Moulder,'--another name
for the Tâo, by which all things are fashioned.

2. See the same passage in Book XXIII, par. 10.

3. The ordinary reading here is fäng (###) 'a boundary' or 'distinctive
limit.' Lin Hsî-hung adopts the reading ###, 'a response,' and I have followed
him.]

{p. 186}

It was through the definite expression of different opinions about it that
there ensued injury to (the doctrine of) the Tâo. It was this injury to the
(doctrine of the) Tâo which led to the formation of (partial) preferences. Was
it indeed after such preferences were formed that the injury came? or did the
injury precede the rise of such preferences? If the injury arose after their
formation, Kâo's method of playing on the lute was natural. If the injury arose
before their formation, there would have been no such playing on the lute as
Kâo's[1].

Kâo Wän's playing on the lute, Shih Kwang's indicating time with his staff,
and Hui-dze's (giving his views), while leaning against a dryandra tree (were
all extraordinary). The knowledge of the three men (in their several arts) was
nearly perfect, and therefore they practised them to the end of their lives.
They loved them because they were different from those of others. They loved
them and wished to make them known to others. But as they could not be made
clear, though they tried to make them so, they ended with the obscure (discussions)
about 'the hard' and 'the White.' And their sons[2], moreover, with all the
threads of their fathers' compositions, yet to the end of their lives accomplished
nothing. If they, proceeding in this way, could be said to have succeeded, then
am I also successful;

[1. Kâo Wän and Shih Kwang were both musicians of the state
of Zin. Shih, which appears as Kwang's surname, was his denomination as 'music-master.'
It is difficult to understand the reason why Kwang-dze introduces these men
and their ways, or how it helps his argument.

2. Perhaps we should read here 'son,' with special reference
to the son of Hui-Sze.]

{p. 187}

if they cannot be pronounced successful, neither I nor any other can succeed.

Therefore the scintillations of light from the midst of confusion and perplexity
are indeed valued by the sagely man; but not to use one's own views and to take
his position on the ordinary views is what is called using the (proper) light.

6. But here now are some other sayings [1]:--I do not know whether they are
of the same character as those which I have already given, or of a different
character. Whether they be of the same character or not when looked at along
with them, they have a character of their own, which cannot be distinguished
from the others. But though this be the case, let me try to explain myself.

There was a beginning. There was a beginning before that beginning[2]. There
was a beginning previous to that beginning before there was the beginning.

There was existence; there had been no existence. There was no existence before
the beginning of that no existence[2]. There was no existence previous to the
no existence before there was the beginning of the no existence. If suddenly
there was nonexistence, we do not know whether it was really anything existing,
or really not existing. Now I have said what I have said, but I do not know
whether what I have said be really anything to the point or not.

[1. Referring, I think, to those below commencing 'There was
a beginning.'

2. That is, looking at things from the standpoint of an original
non-existence, and discarding all considerations of space and time.]

{p. 188}

Under heaven there is nothing greater than the tip of an autumn down, and the
Thâi mountain is small. There is no one more long-lived than a child which dies
prematurely, and Phäng Zû did not live out his time. Heaven, Earth, and
I were produced together, and all things and I are one. Since they are one,
can there be speech about them? But since they are spoken of as one, must there
not be room for speech? One and Speech are two; two and one are three. Going
on from this (in our enumeration), the most skilful reckoner cannot reach (the
end of the necessary numbers), and how much less can ordinary people do so!
Therefore from non-existence we proceed to existence till we arrive at three;
proceeding from existence to existence, to how many should we reach? Let us
abjure such procedure, and simply rest here[1].

7. The Tâo at first met with no responsive recognition. Speech at first had
no constant forms of expression. Because of this there came the demarcations
(of different views). Let me describe those demarcations:-they are the Left
and the Right[2]; the Relations and their Obligations[3]; Classifications[4]

[1. On this concluding clause, Ziâo Hung says:--'Avoiding such
procedure, there will be no affirmations and denials (no contraries). The phrase
### occurs in the Book several times, and interpreters have missed its meaning
from not observing that ### serve merely as a final particle, and often have
the ### added to them, without affecting its meaning.' See also Wang Yin on
the usages of ### in the ###, ch. 1208, art. 6.

2. That is, direct opposites.

3. Literally 'righteousnesses;' the proper way of dealing with
the relations.

4. Literally, 'separations.']

{p. 189}

and their Distinctions; Emulations and Contentions. These are what are called
'the Eight Qualities.' Outside the limits of the world of men[1], the sage occupies
his thoughts, but does not discuss about anything; inside those limits he occupies
his thoughts, but does not pass any judgments. In the Khun Khiû[2], which
embraces the history of the former kings, the sage indicates his judgments,
but does not argue (in vindication of them). Thus it is that he separates his
characters from one another without appearing to do so, and argues without the
form of argument. How does he do so? The sage cherishes his views in his own
breast, while men generally state theirs argumentatively, to show them to others.
Hence we have the saying, 'Disputation is a proof of not seeing clearly.'

The Great Tâo[3] does not admit of being praised. The Great Argument does not
require words. Great Benevolence is not (officiously) benevolent. Great Disinterestedness
does not vaunt its humility. Great Courage is not seen in stubborn bravery.

The Tâo that is displayed is not the Tâo. Words that are argumentative do not
reach the point. Benevolence that is constantly exercised does not accomplish
its object. Disinterestedness that vaunts its purity is not genuine. Courage
that is most stubborn

[1. Literally, 'the six conjunctions,' meaning the four cardinal
points of space, with the zenith and nadir; sometimes a name for the universe
of space. Here we must restrict the meaning as I have done.

is ineffectual. These five seem to be round (and complete), but they tend to
become square (and immovable)[1]. Therefore the knowledge that stops at what
it does not know is the greatest. Who knows the argument that needs no words,
and the Way that is not to be trodden[2]?

He who is able to know this has what is called 'The Heavenly Treasure-house[3].'
He may pour into it without its being filled; he may pour from it without its
being exhausted; and all the while he does not know whence (the supply) comes.
This is what is called 'The Store of Light[3].'

Therefore of old Yâo asked Shun, saying, 'I wish to smite (the rulers of) Zung,
Kwei, and Hsü-âo[4]. Even when standing in my court, I cannot get them out of
my mind. How is it so?' Shun replied, 'Those three rulers live (in their little
states) as if they were among the mugwort and other brushwood;--how is it that
you cannot get them out of your mind? Formerly, ten suns came out together,
and all things were illuminated by them;--how much should (your) virtue exceed
(all) suns!'

4. Three small states. Is Yao's wish to smite an instance of
the 'quality' of 'emulation' or jealousy?

5. Both Tâoistic worthies of the time of Yâo, supposed to have
been two of the Perfect Ones whom Yâo visited on the distant hill of Kû-shih
(I, par. 6). According to Hwang Mî, Wang Î was the teacher of Nieh Khüeh, and
he again of Hsü Yû.]

{p. 191}

affirming?' 'How should I know it?' was the reply. 'Do you know what it is
that you do not know?' asked the other again, and he got the same reply. He
asked a third time,--'Then are all creatures thus without knowledge?' and Wang
Î answered as before, (adding however), 'Notwithstanding, I will try and explain
my meaning. How do you know that when I say "I know it," I really (am showing
that) I do not know it, and that when I say "I do not know it," I really am
showing that I do know it[1].' And let me ask you some questions:--'If a man
sleep in a damp place, he will have a pain in his loins, and half his body will
be as if it were dead; but will it be so with an eel? If he be living in a tree,
he will be frightened and all in a tremble; but will it be so with a monkey?
And does any one of the three know his right place? Men eat animals that have
been fed on grain and grass; deer feed on the thickset grass; centipedes enjoy
small snakes; owls and crows delight in mice; but does any one of the four know
the right taste? The dog-headed monkey finds its mate in the female gibbon;
the elk and the axis deer cohabit; and the eel enjoys itself with other fishes.
Mâo Zhiang[2] and Lî Kî[2] were accounted by men to be most beautiful, but when
fishes saw them, they dived deep in the water from them; when birds, they flew
from them aloft; and

[1. Compare par. 1 of Book XXII.

2. Two famous beauties;--the former, a contemporary of Hsî Shih
(par. 4, note 2), and like her also, of the state of Yüeh; the latter, the daughter
of a barbarian chief among the Western Jung. She was captured by duke Hsien
of Zin, in B. C. 672. He subsequently made her his wife,--to the great injury
of his family and state.]

{p. 192}

when deer saw them, they separated and fled away[1]. But did any of these four
know which in the world is the right female attraction? As I look at the matter,
the first principles of benevolence and righteousness and the paths of approval
and disapproval are inextricably mixed and confused together:--how is it possible
that I should know how to discriminate among them?'

Nieh Khüeh said (further), 'Since you, Sir, do not know what is advantageous
and what is hurtful, is the Perfect man also in the same way without the knowledge
of them?' Wang i replied, 'The Perfect man is spirit-like. Great lakes might
be boiling about him, and he would not feel their heat; the Ho and the Han might
be frozen up, and he would not feel the cold; the hurrying thunderbolts might
split the mountains, and the wind shake the ocean, without being able to make
him afraid. Being such, he mounts on the clouds of the air, rides on the sun
and moon, and rambles at ease beyond the four seas. Neither death nor life makes
any change in him, and how much less should the considerations of advantage
and injury do so[2]!'

9. Khü Zhiâo-dze[3] asked Khang-wû Dze[3], saying,

[1. Not thinking them beautiful, as men did, but frightened
and repelled by them.

2. Compare Book 1, pars. 3 and 5.

3. We know nothing of the former of these men, but what is mentioned
here; the other appears also in Book XXV, 6, q. v. If 'the master' that immediately
follows be Confucius they must have been contemporary with him. The Khiû
in Khang-wû's reply would seem to make it certain 'the master' was Confucius,
but the oldest critics, and some modern ones as well, think that Khang-wû's
name was also Khiû. But this view is attended with more difficulties than
the other. By the clause interjected in the translation after the first 'Master,'
I have avoided the incongruity of ascribing the long description of Tâoism to
Confucius.]

{p. 193}

'I heard the Master (speaking of such language as the following):--"The sagely
man does not occupy himself with worldly affairs. He does not put himself in
the way of what is profitable, nor try to avoid what is hurtful; he has no pleasure
in seeking (for anything from any one); he does not care to be found in (any
established) Way; he speaks without speaking; he does not speak when he speaks;
thus finding his enjoyment outside the dust and dirt (of the world)." The Master
considered all this to be a shoreless flow of mere words, and I consider it
to describe the course of the Mysterious Way.--What do you, Sir, think of it?'
Khang-wû dze replied, 'The hearing of such words would have perplexed
even Hwang-Tî, and how should Khiû be competent to understand them? And
you, moreover, are too hasty in forming your estimate (of their meaning). You
see the egg, and (immediately) look out for the cock (that is to be hatched
from it); you see the bow, and (immediately) look out for the dove (that is
to be brought down by it) being roasted. I will try to explain the thing to
you in a rough way; do you in the same way listen to me.

'How could any one stand by the side of the sun and moon, and hold under his
arm all space and all time? (Such language only means that the sagely man) keeps
his mouth shut, and puts aside questions that are uncertain and dark; making
his inferior capacities unite with him in honouring (the One Lord). Men in general
bustle about and toil; the

{p. 194}

sagely man seems stupid and to know nothing[1]. He blends ten thousand years
together in the one (conception of time); the myriad things all pursue their
spontaneous course, and they are all before him as doing so.

'How do I know that the love of life is not a delusion? and that the dislike
of death is not like a young person's losing his way, and not knowing that he
is (really) going home? Lî Kî[2] was a daughter of the border Warden of Ai.
When (the ruler of) the state of Zin first got possession of her, she wept till
the tears wetted all the front of her dress. But when she came to the place
of the king[3], shared with him his luxurious couch, and ate his grain-and-grass-fed
meat, then she regretted that she had wept. How do I know that the dead do not
repent of their former craving for life?

'Those who dream of (the pleasures of) drinking may in the morning wail and
weep; those who dream of wailing and weeping may in the morning be going out
to hunt. When they were dreaming they did not know it was a dream; in their
dream they may even have tried to interpret it[4]; but when they awoke they
knew that it was a dream. And

[1. Compare Lâo-dze's account of himself in his Work, ch. 20.

2. See note 2 on page 191. The lady is there said to have been
the daughter of a barbarian chief; here she appears as the child of the border
Warden of Aî. But her maiden surname of Kî (###) shows her father must have
been a scion of the royal family of Kâu. Had he forsaken his wardenship, and
joined one of the Tî tribes, which had adopted him as its chief?

3 Zin was only a marquisate. How does Kwang-dze speak of its
ruler as 'a king?'

4 This could not be; a man does not come to himself in his dream,
and in that state try to interpret it.]

{p. 195}

there is the great awaking, after which we shall know that this life was a
great dream[1]. All the while, the stupid think they are awake, and with nice
discrimination insist on their knowledge; now playing the part of rulers, and
now of grooms. Bigoted was that Khiû! He and you are both dreaming. I
who say that you are dreaming am dreaming myself. These words seem very strange;
but if after ten thousand ages we once meet with a great sage who knows how
to explain them, it will be as if we met him (unexpectedly) some morning or
evening.

10. 'Since you made me enter into this discussion with you, if you have got
the better of me and not I of you, are you indeed right, and I indeed wrong?
If I have got the better of you and not you of me, am I indeed right and you
indeed wrong? Is the one of us right and the other wrong? are we both right
or both wrong? Since we cannot come to a mutual and common understanding, men
will certainly continue in darkness on the subject.

'Whom shall I employ to adjudicate in the matter? If I employ one who agrees
with you, how can he, agreeing with you, do so correctly? And the same may be
said, if I employ one who agrees with me. It will be the same if I employ one
who differs from us both or one who agrees with us both. In this way I and you
and those others would all not be able to come to a mutual understanding; and
shall we then wait for that (great sage)? (We need not do so.) To wait on others
to learn how conflicting opinions are changed is simply like not so

[1. Compare XVIII, par. 4.]

{p. 196}

waiting at all. The harmonising of them is to be found in the invisible operation
of Heaven, and by following this on into the unlimited past. It is by this method
that we can complete our years (without our minds being disturbed)[1].

'What is meant by harmonising (conflicting opinions) in the invisible operation
of Heaven? There is the affirmation and the denial of it; and there is the assertion
of an opinion and the rejection of it. If the affirmation be according to the
reality of the fact, it is certainly different from the denial of it:--there
can be no dispute about that. If the assertion of an opinion be correct, it
is certainly different from its rejection:--neither can there be any dispute
about that. Let us forget the lapse of time; let us forget the conflict of opinions.
Let us make our appeal to the Infinite, and take up our position there[2].'

11. The Penumbra asked the Shadow[3], saying, 'Formerly you were walking on,
and now you have stopped; formerly you were sitting, and now you have risen
up:--how is it that you are so without stability?' The Shadow replied, 'I wait
for the movements of something else to do what I do, and that something else
on which I wait waits further

[1. See this passage again in Book XXVII, par. i, where the
phrase which I have called here 'the invisible operation of Heaven,' is said
to be the same as 'the Heavenly Mould or Moulder,' that is, the Heavenly Fashioner,
one of the Tâoistic names for the Tâo.

2. That is, all things being traced up to the unity of the Tâo,
we have found the pivot to which all conflicting opinions, all affirmations,
all denials, all positions and negatives converge, and bring to bear on them
the proper light of the mind. Compare paragraph 3.

3. A story to the same effect as this here, with some textual
variations, occurs in Book XXVII, immediately after par. 1 referred to above.]

{p. 197}

on another to do as it does[1]. My waiting,--is it for the scales of a snake,
or the wings of a cicada[2]? How should I know why I do one thing, or do not
do another[3]?

'Formerly, I, Kwang Kâu, dreamt that I was a butterfly, a butterfly flying
about, feeling that it was enjoying itself I did not know that it was Kâu. Suddenly
I awoke, and was myself again, the veritable Kâu. I did not know whether it
had formerly been Kâu dreaming that he was a butterfly, or it was now a butterfly
dreaming that it was Kâu. But between Kâu and a butterfly there must be a difference[4].
This is a case of what is called the Transformation of Things[4].'

[1. The mind cannot rest in second causes, and the first cause,
if there be one, is inscrutable.

2. Even these must wait for the will of the creature; but the
case of the shadow is still more remarkable.

3. 1 have put this interrogatively, as being more graphic, and
because of the particle ###, which is generally, though not necessarily, interrogative.

4. Hsüan Ying, in his remarks on these two sentences, brings
out the force of the story very successfully:--'Looking at them in their ordinary
appearance, there was necessarily a difference between them, but in the delusion
of the dream each of them appeared the other, and they could not distinguish
themselves! Kâu could be a butterfly, and the butterfly could be Kâu;--we may
see that in the world all traces of that and this may pass away, as they come
under the influence of transformations.' For the phrase, 'the transformation
of things,' see in Book X1, par. 5, et al. But the Tâoism here can hardly be
distinguished from the Buddhism that holds that all human experience is merely
so much mâya or illusion.]

{p. 198}

BOOK III.

PART I. SECTION III.

Yang Shang Kû, or 'Nourishing the Lord of Life[1].'

1. There is a limit to our life, but to knowledge there is no limit. With what
is limited to pursue after what is unlimited is a perilous thing; and when,
knowing this, we still seek the increase of our knowledge, the peril cannot
be averted[2]. There should not be the practice of what is good with any thought
of the fame (which it will bring), nor of what is evil with any approximation
to the punishment (which it will incur)[3]:--an accordance with the Central
Element (of our nature)[4] is the regular way to preserve the body, to maintain
the life, to nourish our parents, and to complete our term of years.

2. His cook[5] was cutting up an ox for the ruler Wän-hui[5]. Whenever he applied
his hand, leaned forward with his shoulder, planted his foot, and employed

[1. See pp. 130, 131.

2. Under what is said about knowledge here there lies the objection
of Tâoists to the Confucian pursuit of knowledge as the means for the right
conduct of life, instead of the quiet simplicity and self-suppression of their
own system.

3. This is the key to the three paragraphs that follow. But
the text of it is not easily construed. The 'doing good' and the doing evil'
are to be lightly understood.

4. A name for the Tâo.

5. 'The ruler Wän-hui' is understood to be 'king Hui of Liang
(or Wei),' with the account of an interview between whom and Mencius the works
of that philosopher commence.]

{p. 199}

the pressure of his knee, in the audible ripping off of the skin, and slicing
operation of the knife, the sounds were all in regular cadence. Movements and
sounds proceeded as in the dance of 'the Mulberry Forest[1]' and the blended
notes of 'the King Shâu[1].' The ruler said, 'Ah! Admirable! That your art should
have become so perfect!' (Having finished his operation), the cook laid down
his knife, and replied to the remark, 'What your servant loves is the method
of the Tâo, something in advance of any art. When I first began to cut up an
ox, I saw nothing but the (entire) carcase. After three years I ceased to see
it as a whole. Now I deal with it in a spirit-like manner, and do not look at
it with my eyes. The use of my senses is discarded, and my spirit acts as it
wills. Observing the natural lines, (my knife) slips through the great crevices
and slides through the great cavities, taking advantage of the facilities thus
presented. My art avoids the membranous ligatures, and much more the great bones.

'A good cook changes his knife every year;--(it may have been injured) in cutting;
an ordinary cook changes his every month;--(it may have been) broken. Now my
knife has been in use for nineteen years; it has cut up several thousand oxen,
and yet its edge is as sharp as if it had newly come from the whetstone. There
are the interstices of the joints, and the edge of the knife has no (appreciable)
thickness; when that which is so thin enters where the interstice is, how easily
it moves along! The

[1. Two pieces of music, ascribed to Khäng Thang and Hwang-Tî.]

{p. 200}

blade has more than room enough. Nevertheless, whenever I come to a complicated
joint, and see that there will be some difficulty, I proceed anxiously and with
caution, not allowing my eyes to wander from the place, and moving my hand slowly.
Then by a very slight movement of the knife, the part is quickly separated,
and drops like (a clod of) earth to the ground. Then standing up with the knife
in my hand, I look all round, and in a leisurely manner, with an air of satisfaction,
wipe it clean, and put it in its sheath.' The ruler Wän-hui said, 'Excellent!
I have heard the words of my cook, and learned from them the nourishment of
(our) life.'

3. When Kung-wän Hsien[1] saw the Master of the Left, he was startled, and
said, 'What sort of man is this? How is it he has but one foot? Is it from Heaven?
or from Man?' Then he added[2], 'It must be from Heaven, and not from Man. Heaven's
making of this man caused him to have but one foot. In the person of man, each
foot has its marrow. By this I know that his peculiarity is from Heaven, and
not from Man. A pheasant of the marshes has to take ten steps to pick up a mouthful
of food, and thirty steps to get a drink, but it does not seek to be nourished
in a coop. Though its spirit would (there) enjoy a royal abundance, it does
not think (such confinement) good.'

[1. There was a family in Wei with the double surname Kung-wän.
This would be a scion of it.

2. This is Hsien still speaking. We have to understand his reasoning
ad sensum and not ad verbum. The master of the Left had done 'evil,' so as to
incur the punishment from which be suffered; and had shown himself less wise
than a pheasant.]

{p. 201}

4. When Lâo Tan died[1], Khin Shih[2] went to condole (with his son), but after
crying out three times, he came out. The disciples[3] said to him, 'Were you
not a friend of the Master?' 'I was,' he replied, and they said, 'Is it proper
then to offer your condolences merely as you have done?' He said, 'It is. At
first I thought he was the man of men, and now I do not think so. When I entered
a little ago and expressed my condolences, there were the old men wailing as
if they had lost a son, and the young men wailing as if they had lost their
mother. In his attracting and uniting them to himself in such a way there must
have been that which made them involuntarily express their words (of condolence),
and involuntarily wail, as they were doing. And this was a hiding from himself
of his Heaven (-nature), and an excessive indulgence of his (human) feelings;--a
forgetting of what he had received (in being born); what the ancients called
the punishment due to neglecting the Heaven (-nature). When the Master came[5],
it was at the proper time; when he went away, it was the simple sequence (of
his coming). Quiet acquiescence in what happens at its proper time, and quietly
submitting (to its ceasing) afford no occasion for grief or for joy[6]. The
ancients described (death) as the loosening of the

[1. Then the account that Lâo-dze went westwards, and that nothing
is known as to where he died, must be without foundation.

2. Nothing more is known of this person.

3. Probably the disciples of Lâo-dze.

4. Lâo had gone to an excess in his 'doing good,' as if he were
seeking reputation.

5. Into the world.

6. See Kwang-dze's remarks and demeanour on the death of his
wife, in Book XVIII.]

{p. 202}

cord on which God suspended (the life)[1]. What we can point to are the faggots
that have been consumed; but the fire is transmitted (elsewhere), and we know
not that it is over and ended[2].

[1. This short sentence is remarkable by the use of the character
Tî (###) 'God,' in it, a usage here ascribed to the ancients.

2. The concluding sentence might stand as a short paragraph
by itself. The 'faggots' are understood to represent the body, and the 'fire'
the animating spirit. The body perishes at death as the faggots are consumed
by the fire. But the fire may be transmitted to other faggots, and so the spirit
may migrate, and be existing elsewhere.]

{p. 203}

BOOK IV.

PART I. SECTION IV.

Zän Kien Shih, or 'Man in the World, Associated with other Men[1].'

1. Yen Hui[2] went to see Kung-nî[3], and asked leave to take his departure.
'Where are you going to?' asked the Master. 'I will go to Wei[4]' was the reply.
'And with what object?' 'I have heard that the ruler of Wei[5] is in the vigour
of his years, and consults none but himself as to his course. He deals with
his state as if it were a light matter, and has no perception of his errors.
He thinks lightly of his people's dying; the dead are lying all over the country
as if no smaller space could contain them; on the plains[6] and about the marshes,
they are as thick as heaps of fuel. The people know not where to turn to. I
have heard you, Master, say, "Leave the state that is well

[1. See pp. 131, 132.

2. The favourite disciple of Confucius, styled also Dze-yüan.

3. Of course, Confucius;--his designation or married name.

4. A feudal state, embracing portions of the present provinces
of Ho-nan, Kih-lî, and Shan-tung. There was another state, which we must also
call Wei in English, though the Chinese characters of them are different;--one
of the fragments of the great state of Zin, more to the west.

5. At this time the marquis Yüan, known to us by his posthumous
title of duke Ling;--see Book XXV, 9.

Adopting Lin's reading of ### instead of the common ###.]

{p. 204}

governed; go to the state where disorder prevails[1]." At the door of a physician
there are many who are ill. I wish through what I have heard (from you) to think
out some methods (of dealing with Wei), if peradventure the evils of the state
may be cured.'

Kung-nî said, 'Alas! The risk is that you will go only to suffer in the punishment
(of yourself)! The right method (in such a case) will not admit of any admixture.
With such admixture, the one method will become many methods. Their multiplication
will embarrass you. That embarrassment will make you anxious. However anxious
you may be, you will not save (yourself). The perfect men of old first had (what
they wanted to do) in themselves, and afterwards they found (the response to
it) in others. If what they wanted in themselves was not fixed, what leisure
had they to go and interfere with the proceedings of any tyrannous man?

'Moreover, do you know how virtue is liable to be dissipated, and how wisdom
proceeds to display itself? Virtue is dissipated in (the pursuit of) the name
for it, and wisdom seeks to display itself in the striving with others. In the
pursuit of the name men overthrow one another; wisdom becomes a weapon of contention.
Both these things are instruments of evil, and should not be allowed to have
free course in one's conduct. Supposing one's virtue to be great and his sincerity
firm, if he do not comprehend the spirit of those (whom he wishes to influence);
and supposing he is free from the

[1. Compare in the Analects, VIII, xiii, 2, where a different
lesson is given; but Confucius may at another time have spoken as Hui says.]

{p. 205}

disposition to strive for reputation, if he do not comprehend their, minds;-when
in such a case he forcibly insists on benevolence and righteousness, setting
them forth in the strongest and most direct language, before the tyrant, then
he, hating (his reprover's) possession of those excellences, will put him down
as doing him injury. He who injures others is sure to be injured by them in
return. You indeed will hardly escape being injured by the man (to whom you
go)[1]

'Further, if perchance he takes pleasure in men of worth and hates those of
an opposite character, what is the use of your seeking to make yourself out
to be different (from such men about him)? Before you have begun to announce
(your views), he, as king and ruler, will take advantage of you, and immediately
contend with you for victory. Your eyes will be dazed and full of perplexity;
you will try to look pleased with him; you will frame your words with care;
your demeanour will be conformed to his; you will confirm him in his views.
In this way you will be adding fire to fire, and water to water, increasing,
as we may express it, the evils (which you deplore). To these signs of deferring
to him at the first there will be no end. You will be in danger, seeing he does
not believe you, of making your words more strong, and you are sure to die at
the hands of such a tyrant.

these cultivated their persons, bending down in sympathy with the lower people
to comfort them suffering (as they did) from their oppressors, and on their
account opposing their superiors. On this account, because they so ordered their
conduct, their rulers compassed their destruction:--such regard had they for
their own fame. (Again), Yâo anciently attacked (the states of) Zhung-kih[1]
and Hsü-âo[1], and Yü attacked the ruler of Hû[1]. Those states were left
empty, and with no one to continue their population, the people being exterminated.
They had engaged in war without ceasing; their craving for whatever they could
get was insatiable. And this (ruler of Wei) is, like them, one who craves after
fame and greater substance;--have you not heard it? Those sages were not able
to overcome the thirst for fame and substance;--how much less will you be able
to do so! Nevertheless you must have some ground (for the course which you wish
to take); pray try and tell it to me.'

Yen Hui said, 'May I go, doing so in uprightness and humility, using also every
endeavour to be uniform (in my plans of operation)?' 'No, indeed!' was the reply.
'How can you do so? This man makes a display[2] of being filled to overflowing
(with virtue), and has great self-conceit. His feelings are not to be determined
from his countenance. Ordinary men do not (venture to) oppose him, and he proceeds
from the way in which he affects them

[1. See in par. 7, Book II, where Hsü-âo is mentioned, though
not Zhung-kih. See the Shû, III, ii.

2. I take ### here as = ###;--a meaning given in the Khang-hsî
dictionary.]

{p. 207}

to seek still more the satisfaction of his own mind. He may be described as
unaffected by the (small lessons of) virtue brought to bear on him from day
to day; and how much less will he be so by your great lessons? He will be obstinate,
and refuse to be converted. He may outwardly agree with you, but inwardly there
will be no self-condemnation;-how can you (go to him in this way and be successful)?'

(Yen Hui) rejoined, 'Well then; while inwardly maintaining my straightforward
intention, I will outwardly seem to bend to him. I will deliver (my lessons),
and substantiate them by appealing to antiquity. Inwardly maintaining my straightforward
intention, I shall be a co-worker with Heaven. When I thus speak of being a
co-worker with Heaven, it is because I know that (the sovereign, whom we style)
the son of Heaven, and myself, are equally regarded by Heaven as Its sons. And
should I then, as if my words were only my own, be seeking to find whether men
approved of them, or disapproved of them? In this way men will pronounce me
a (sincere and simple[1]) boy. This is what is called being a co-worker with
Heaven.

'Outwardly bending (to the ruler), I shall be a co-worker with other men. To
carry (the memorandum tablet to court)[2], to kneel, and to bend the body reverentially:-these
are the observances of ministers. They all employ them, and should I presume
not to do so? Doing what other men do, they would have no occasion to blame
me. This

[1. Entirely unsophisticated, governed by the Tâo.

2. See the Lî Kî, XI, ii, 16, 11.]

{p. 208}

is what is called being a fellow-worker with other men.

'Fully declaring my sentiments and substantiating them by appealing to antiquity,
I shall be a co-worker with the ancients. Although the words in which I convey
my lessons may really be condemnatory (of the ruler), they will be those of
antiquity, and not my own. In this way, though straightforward, I shall be free
from blame. This is what is called being a co-worker with antiquity. May I go
to Wei in this way, and be successful?' 'No indeed!' said Kung-nî. 'How can
you do so? You have too many plans of proceeding, and have not spied out (the
ruler's character). Though you firmly adhere to your plans, you may be held
free from transgression, but this will be all the result. How can you (in this
way) produce the transformation (which you desire)? All this only shows (in
you) the mind of a teacher!'

2. Yen Hui said, 'I can go no farther; I venture to ask the method from you.'
Kung-nî replied, 'It is fasting[1], (as) I will tell you. (But) when you have
the method, will you find it easy to practise it? He who thinks it easy will
be disapproved of by the bright Heaven.' Hui said, 'My family is poor. For months
together we have no spirituous drink, nor do we taste the proscribed food or
any strong-smelling vegetables[2];--can this be regarded as fasting?' The reply
was, 'It is the fasting appropriate to sacrificing, but it is not the fasting

[1. The term is emphatic, as Confucius goes on to explain.

2. Such as onions and garlic, with horse, dog, cow, goose, and
pigeon.]

{p. 209}

of the mind.' 'I venture to ask what that fasting of the mind is,' said Hui,
and Kung-nî answered, 'Maintain a perfect unity in every movement of your will.
You will not wait for the hearing of your ears about it, but for the hearing
of your mind. You will not wait even for the hearing of your mind, but for the
hearing of the spirit[1]. Let the hearing (of the ears) rest with the ears.
Let the mind rest in the verification (of the rightness of what is in the will).
But the spirit is free from all pre-occupation and so waits for (the appearance
of) things. Where the (proper) course is[2], there is freedom from all pre-occupation;--such
freedom is the fasting of the mind.' Hui said[3], 'Before it was possible for
me to employ (this method), there I was, the Hui that I am; now, that I can
employ it, the Hui that I was has passed away. Can I be said to have obtained
this freedom from pre-occupation?' The Master replied, 'Entirely. I tell you
that you can enter and be at ease in the enclosure (where he is), and not come
into collision with the reputation (which belongs to him). If he listen to your
counsels, let him hear your notes; if he will not listen, be silent. Open no
(other) door; employ no other medicine; dwell with him (as with a. friend) in
the same apartment, and as if you had no other option, and you will not be far
from success in your object. Not to move a step is easy;--to walk without treading
on the ground is difficult. In acting after the manner of men, it is easy to
fall

[1. The character in the text for 'spirit' here is ###, 'the
breath.'

2. The Tâo.

3. 'Said;' probably, after having made trial of this fasting.]

{p. 210}

into hypocrisy; in acting after the manner of Heaven, it is difficult to play
the hypocrite. I have heard of flying with wings; I have not heard of flying
without them. I have heard of the knowledge of the wise; I have not heard of
the knowledge of the unwise. Look at that aperture (left in the wall);--the
empty apartment is filled with light through it. Felicitous influences rest
(in the mind thus emblemed), as in their proper resting place. Even when they
do not so rest, we have what is called (the body) seated and (the mind) galloping
abroad. The information that comes through the ears and eyes is comprehended
internally, and the knowledge of the mind becomes something external:--(when
this is the case), the spiritual intelligences will come, and take up their
dwelling with us, and how much more will other men do so! All things thus undergo
a transforming influence. This was the hinge on which Yü and Shun moved; it
was this which Fû-hsî[1] and Kî-khü[2] practised all their lives: how
much more should other men follow the same rule!'

3. Dze-kâo[3], duke of Sheh, being about to proceed on a mission to Khî, asked
Kung-nî, saying, 'The king is sending me, Kû-liang[3], on a mission which

[1. Often spoken of as Fo-hî, the founder of the Chinese kingdom.
His place in chronology should be assigned to him more than B.C. 3000 rather
than under that date.

2. A predecessor of Fû-hsî, a sovereign of the ancient
paradisiacal time.

3. The name of Sheh remains in Sheh-hsien, a district of the
department Nan-yang, Ho-nan. Its governor, who is the subject of this narrative,
was a Shän Kû-liang, styled dze-kâo. He was {footnote p. 211} not a duke,
but as the counts of Khû had usurped the name of king, they gave high-sounding
names to all their ministers and officers.]

{p. 211}

is very important. Khî will probably treat me as his commissioner with great
respect, but it will not be in a hurry (to attend to the business). Even an
ordinary man cannot be readily moved (to action), and how much less the prince
of a state! I am very full of apprehension. You, Sir, once said to me that of
all things, great or small, there were few which, if not conducted in the proper
way[1], could be brought to a happy conclusion; that, if the thing were not
successful, there was sure to be the evil of being dealt with after the manner
of men[2]; that, if it were successful, there was sure to be the evil of constant
anxiety[3]; and that, whether it succeeded or not, it was only the virtuous
man who could secure its not being followed by evil. In my diet I take what
is coarse, and do not seek delicacies,--a man whose cookery does not require
him to be using cooling, drinks. This morning I received my charge, and in the
evening I am drinking iced water;--am I not feeling the internal heat (and discomfort)?
Such is my state before I have actually engaged in the affair;--I am already
suffering from conflicting anxieties. And if the thing do not succeed, (the
king) is sure to deal with me after the manner of men. The evil is twofold;
as a minister, I am not able to bear the burden (of the mission). Can

Kung-nî replied, 'In all things under heaven there are two great cautionary
considerations:--the one is the requirement implanted (in the nature)[1]; the
other is the conviction of what is right. The love of a son for his parents
is the implanted requirement, and can never be separated from his heart; the
service of his ruler by a minister is what is right, and from its obligation
there is no escaping anywhere between heaven and earth. These are what are called
the great cautionary considerations. Therefore a son finds his rest in serving
his parents without reference to or choice of place; and this is the height
of filial duty. In the same way a subject finds his rest in serving his ruler,
without reference to or choice of the business; and this is the fullest discharge
of loyalty. When men are simply obeying (the dictates of) their hearts, the
considerations of grief and joy are not readily set before them. They know that
there is no alternative to their acting as they do, and rest in it as what is
appointed; and this is the highest achievement of virtue. He who is in the position
of a minister or of a son has indeed to do what he cannot but do. Occupied with
the details of the business (in hand), and forgetful of his own person, what
leisure has he to think of his pleasure in living or his dislike of death? You,
my master, may well proceed on your mission.

'But let me repeat to you what I have heard:--In

[1. The Ming of the text here is that in the first sentence
of the Kung Yung.]

{p. 213}

all intercourse (between states), if they are near to each other, there should
be mutual friendliness, verified by deeds; if they are far apart, there must
be sincere adherence to truth in their messages. Those messages will be transmitted
by internuncios. But to convey messages which express the complacence or the
dissatisfaction of the two parties is the most difficult thing in the world.
If they be those of mutual complacence, there is sure to be an overflow of expressions
of satisfaction; if of mutual dissatisfaction, an overflow of expressions of
dislike. But all extravagance leads to reckless language, and such language
fails to command belief. When this distrust arises, woe to the internuncio!
Hence the Rules for Speech I say, "Transmit the message exactly as it stands;
do not transmit it with any overflow of language; so is (the internuncio) likely
to keep himself whole."

4. 'Moreover, skilful wrestlers begin with open trials of strength, but always
end with masked attempts (to gain the victory); as their excitement grows excessive,
they display much wonderful dexterity. Parties drinking according to the rules
at first observe good order, but always end with disorder; as their excitement
grows excessive, their fun becomes uproarious[2]. In all things it is so. People
are at first sincere, but always end with becoming rude; at the commencement
things are treated as trivial,

[1. Probably a Collection of Directions current at the time;
and which led to the name of Yang Hsiung's Treatise with the same name in our
first century.

2. See the Shih, II, vii, 6.]

{p. 214}

but as the end draws near, they assume great proportions. Words are (like)
the waves acted on by the wind; the real point of the matters (discussed by
them) is lost. The wind and waves are easily set in motion; the success of the
matter of which the real point is lost is easily put in peril. Hence quarrels
are occasioned by nothing so much as by artful words and one-sided speeches.
The breath comes angrily, as when a beast, driven to death, wildly bellows forth
its rage. On this animosities arise on both sides. Hasty examination (of the
case) eagerly proceeds, and revengeful thoughts arise in their minds;-they do
not know how. Since they do not know how such thoughts arise, who knows how
they will end? Hence the Rules for Speech[1] say, "Let not an internuncius depart
from his instructions. Let him not urge on a settlement. If he go beyond the
regular rules, he will complicate matters. Departing from his instructions and
urging on a settlement imperils negotiations. A good settlement is proved by
its lasting long, and a bad settlement cannot be altered;--ought he not to be
careful? "

'Further still, let your mind find its enjoyment in the circumstances of your
position; nourish the central course which you pursue, by a reference to your
unavoidable obligations. This is the highest object for you to pursue; what
else can you do to fulfil the charge (of your father and ruler)[2]. The best
thing you can do is to be prepared to sacrifice your life; and this is the most
difficult thing to do.'

[1. See above, on preceding page.

2. Not meaning the king of Khû; but the Tâo, whose will
was to be found in his nature and the conditions of his lot.]

{p. 215}

5. Yen Ho[1], being about to undertake the office of Teacher of the eldest
son of duke Ling of Wei, consulted Kü Po-yü[2]. 'Here,' said he, 'is this (young)
man, whose natural disposition is as bad as it could be. If I allow him to proceed
in a bad way, it will be at the peril of our state; if I insist on his proceeding
in a right way, it will be at the peril of my own person. His wisdom is just
sufficient to know the errors of other men, but he does not know how he errs
himself What am I to do in such a case?' Kü Po-yü replied, 'Good indeed is your
question! Be on your guard; be careful; see that you keep yourself correct!
Your best plan will be, with your person to seek association with him, and with
your mind to try to be in harmony with him; and yet there are dangers connected
with both of these things. While seeking to keep near to him, do not enter into
his pursuits; while cultivating a harmony of mind with him, do not show how
superior you are to him. If in your personal association you enter into his
pursuits, you will fall with him and be ruined, you will tumbledown with a crash.
If in maintaining a harmony with his mind, you show how different you are from
him, he will think you do so for the reputation and the name, and regard you
as a creature of evil omen[3]. If you find him to be a mere boy, be you with
him as another boy; if you find him one of those who will not have their ground
marked out in the ordinary way, do you humour

[1. A member of the Yen family of Lû. We shall meet with
him again in Books XIX, XXVIII, and XXXII.

2. A minister of Wei; a friend and favourite of Confucius.

3. Compare in the Kung Yung, ii, ch. 24.]

{p. 216}

him in this characteristic[1]; if you find him to be free from lofty airs,
show yourself to be the same;(ever) leading him on so as to keep him free from
faults.

'Do you not know (the fate of) the praying mantis? It angrily stretches out
its arms, to arrest the progress of the carriage, unconscious of its inability
for such a task, but showing how much it thinks of its own powers. Be on your
guard; be careful. If you cherish a boastful confidence in your own excellence,
and place yourself in collision with him, you are likely to incur the fate (of
the mantis).

'Do you not know how those who keep tigers proceed? They do not dare to supply
them with living creatures, because of the rage which their killing of them
will excite. They do not (even) dare to give them their food whole, because
of the rage which their rending of it will excite. They watch till their hunger
is appeased, (dealing with them) from their knowledge of their natural ferocity.
Tigers are different from men, but they fawn on those who feed them, and do
so in accordance with their nature. When any of these are killed by them, it
is because they have gone against that nature.

'Those again who are fond of horses preserve their dung in baskets, and their
urine in jars. If musquitoes and gadflies light on them, and the grooms brush
them suddenly away, the horses break their bits, injure (the ornaments on) their
heads, and smash those on their breasts. The more care that is taken of them,
the more does their fondness

[1. Equivalent to I Do not cross him in his peculiarities.']

{p. 217}

(for their attendants) disappear. Ought not caution to be exercised (in the
management of them)?'

6. A (master) mechanic, called Shih, on his way to Khî, came to Khü-yüan[1],
where he saw an oak-tree, which was used as the altar for the spirits of the
land. It was so large that an ox standing behind it could not be seen. It measured
a hundred spans round, and rose up eighty cubits on the hill before it threw
out any branches, after which there were ten or so, from each of which a boat
could be hollowed out. People came to see it in crowds as in a market place,
but the mechanic did not look round at it, but held on his way without stopping.
One of his workmen, however, looked long and admiringly at it, and then ran
on to his master, and said to him, 'Since I followed you with my axe and bill,
I have never seen such a beautiful mass of timber as this. Why would you, Sir,
not look round at it, but went on without stopping?' 'Have done,' said Mr. Shih,
'and do not speak about it. It is quite useless. A boat made from its wood would
sink; a coffin or shell would quickly rot; an article of furniture would soon
go to pieces; a door would be covered with the exuding sap; a pillar would be
riddled by insects; the material of it is good for nothing, and hence it is
that it has attained to so great an age[2].'

[1. The name of a place; of a road; of a bend in the road; of
a hill. All these accounts of the name are found in different editions of our
author, showing that the locality had not been identified.

2. No one has thought it worth cutting down.]

{p. 218}

When Mr. Shih was returning, the altar-oak appeared to him in a dream, and
said, I What other tree will you compare with me? Will you compare me to one
of your ornamental trees? There are hawthorns, pear-trees, orange-trees, pummelo-trees,
gourds and other low fruit-bearing plants. When their fruits are ripe, they
are knocked down from them, and thrown among the dirt[1]. The large branches
are broken, and the smaller are torn away. So it is that their productive ability
makes their lives bitter to them; they do not complete their natural term of
existence, but come to a premature end in the middle of their time, bringing
on themselves the destructive treatment which they ordinarily receive. It is
so with all things. I have sought to discover how it was that I was so useless;--I
had long done so, till (the effort) nearly caused my death; and now I have learned
it:--it has been of the greatest use to me. Suppose that I had possessed useful
properties, should I have become of the great size that I am? And moreover you
and I are both things;--how should one thing thus pass its judgment on another?
how is it that you a useless man know all this about me a useless tree?' When
Mr. Shih awoke, he kept thinking about his dream, but the workman said, 'Being
so taken with its uselessness, how is it that it yet acts here as the altar
for the spirits of the land?' 'Be still,' was the master's reply, 'and do not
say a word. It simply happened to grow here; and thus those who do not know
it do not speak ill of it as an evil thing. If it were not used as the altar,
would it be in danger of

[1. This is the indignity intended.]

{p. 219}

being cut down? Moreover, the reason of its being preserved is different from
that of the preservation of things generally; is not your explaining it from
the sentiment which you have expressed wide of the mark?'

7. Nan-po Dze-khî[1] in rambling about the Heights of Shang[2], saw a large
and extraordinary tree. The teams of a thousand chariots might be sheltered
under it, and its shade would cover them all! Dze-khî said, 'What a tree is
this! It must contain an extraordinary amount of timber! When he looked up,
however, at its smaller branches, they were so twisted and crooked that they
could not be made into rafters and beams; when he looked down to its root, its
stem was divided into so many rounded portions that neither coffin nor shell
could be made from them. He licked one of its leaves, and his mouth felt torn
and wounded. The smell of it would make a man frantic, as if intoxicated, for
more than three whole days together. 'This, indeed,' said he, 'is a tree good
for nothing, and it is thus that it has attained to such a size. Ah! and spirit-like
men acknowledge this worthlessness (and its result)[3].'

In Sung there is the district of King-shih[4], in which catalpae, cypresses,
and mulberry trees grow well. Those of them which are a span or two or rather
more in circumference[5] are cut down by persons who want to make posts to which
to tie their

[1. Probably the Nan-kwo Dze-khî at the beginning of the second
Book.

2. In the present department of Kwei-teh, Ho-nan.

3. A difficult sentence to construe.

4. In what part of the duchy we do not know.

5. See Mencius, VI, i, 13.]

{p. 220}

monkeys; those which are three or four spans round are cut down by persons
who want beams for their lofty and famous houses; and those of seven or eight
spans are cut down by noblemen and rich merchants who want single planks for
the sides of their coffins. The trees in consequence do not complete their natural
term of life, and come to a premature end in the middle of their growth under
the axe and bill;--this is the evil that befalls them from their supplying good
timber.

In the same way the Kieh[1] (book) specifies oxen that have white foreheads,
pigs that have turned-up snouts, and men that are suffering from piles, and
forbids their being sacrificed to the Ho. The wizards know them by these peculiarities
and consider them to be inauspicious, but spirit-like men consider them on this
account to be very fortunate.

8. There was the deformed object Shû[2]. His chin seemed to hide his
navel; his shoulders were higher than the crown of his head; the knot of his
hair pointed to the sky; his five viscera were all compressed into the upper
part of his body, and his two thigh bones were like ribs. By sharpening needles
and washing clothes he was able to make a living. By sifting rice and cleaning
it, he was able to support ten individuals. When the government was calling
out soldiers, this poor Shû would bare his arms among the others; when
it had any great service to be undertaken, because of his constant ailments,
none of the work was assigned to him; when it was

[1. Probably the name of an old work on sacrifices. But was
there ever a time in China when human sacrifices were offered to the Ho, or
on any altar?

2. One of Kwang-dze's creations.]

{p. 221}

giving out grain to the sick, he received three kung, and ten bundles of firewood.
If this poor man, so deformed in body, was still able to support himself, and
complete his term of life, how much more may they do so, whose deformity is
that of their faculties[1]!

9. When Confucius went to Khû[2], Khieh-yû, the madman of Khû[3],
as he was wandering about, passed by his door, and said, 'O Phoenix, O Phoenix,
how is your virtue degenerated! The future is not to be waited for; the past
is not to be sought again! When good order prevails in the world, the sage tries
to accomplish all his service; when disorder prevails, he may preserve his life;
at the present time, it is enough if he simply escape being punished. Happiness
is lighter than a feather, but no one knows how to support it; calamity is heavier
than the earth, and yet no one knows how to avoid it. Give over! give over approaching
men with the lessons of your virtue! You are in peril! you are in peril, hurrying
on where you have marked out the ground against your advance! I avoid publicity,
I avoid publicity, that my path may not be injured. I pursue my course, now
going backwards, now crookedly, that my feet may not be hurt[4].

[1. The deficiency of their faculties--here mental faculties--would
assimilate them to the useless trees in the last two paragraphs, whose uselessness
only proved useful to them.

2. The great state of the south, having its capital in the present
Hû-pei.

3 See the Analects, XVIII, v.

4 The madman would seem to contrast his own course with that
of Confucius; but the meaning is very uncertain, and the text cannot be discussed
fully in these short notes. There is a jingle {footnote p. 222} of rhyme also
in the sentence, and some critics find something like this in them:

'The mountain by its trees weakens itself[1]. The grease which ministers to
the fire fries itself The cinnamon tree can be eaten, and therefore it is cut
down. The varnish tree is useful, and therefore incisions are made in it. All
men know the advantage of being useful, but no one knows the advantage of being
useless.'

BOOK V.

PART I. SECTION V.

Teh Khung Fû, or 'The Seal of Virtue Complete[1].'

1. In Lû[2] there was a Wang Thâi[3] who had lost both his feet[4]; while
his disciples who followed and went about with him were as numerous as those
of Kung-nî. Khang Kî[5] asked Kung-nî about him, saying, 'Though Wang Thâi is
a cripple, the disciples who follow him about divide Lû equally with you,
Master. When he stands, he does not teach them; when he sits, he does not discourse
to them. But they go to him empty, and come back full. Is there indeed such
a thing as instruction without words[6]? and while the body is imperfect, may
the mind be complete? What sort of man is he?'

Kung-nî replied, 'This master is a sage. I have

[1. See pp. 133, 134.

2. The native state of Confucius, part of the present Shan-tung.

3. A Tâoist of complete virtue; but probably there was not really
such a person. Our author fabricates him according to his fashion.

4. The character uh (###) does not say that he had lost both
his feet, but I suppose that such is the meaning, because of what is said of
Toeless below that 'he walked on his heels to see Confucius.' The feet must
have been amputated, or mutilated rather (justly or unjustly), as a punishment;
but Kwang-dze wished to say nothing on that point.

5. Perhaps a disciple of Confucius;--not elsewhere mentioned
as such.

6. Seethe Tâo Teh King, ch. 2.]

{p. 224}

only been too late in going to him. I will make him my teacher; and how much
more should those do so who are not equal to me! Why should only the state of
Lû follow him? I will lead on all under heaven with me to do so.' Khang
Kî rejoined, 'He is a man who has lost his feet, and yet he is known as the
venerable Wang[1];--he must be very different from ordinary men. What is the
peculiar way in which he employs his mind?' The reply was, 'Death and life are
great considerations, but they could work no change in him. Though heaven and
earth were to be overturned and fall, they would occasion him no loss. His judgment
is fixed regarding that in which there is no element of falsehood[2]; and, while
other things change, he changes not. The transformations of things are to him
the developments prescribed for them, and he keeps fast hold of the author of
them[2].'

Khang Kî said, 'What do you mean? When we look at things,' said Kung-nî, 'as
they differ, we see them to be different, (as for instance) the liver and the
gall, or Khû and Yüeh; when we look at them, as they agree, we see them
all to be a unity. So it is with this (Wang Thai). He takes no knowledge of
the things for which his ears and eyes are the appropriate organs, but his mind
delights itself in the harmony of (all excellent) qualities. He looks at the
unity which belongs to things, and does not perceive where they have suffered
loss. He looks

[1. Literally, 'the Senior;' often rendered 'Teacher.'

2. 'That in which there is no element of falsehood' is the Tâo,
which also is the 'Author' of all the changes that take place in time and space.
See the Introductory Note on the title and subject of the Book.]

{p. 225}

on the loss of his feet as only the loss of so much earth.'

Khang Kî said, 'He is entirely occupied with his (proper) self[1]. By his knowledge
he has discovered (the nature of) his mind, and to that he holds as what is
unchangeable[1]; but how is it that men make so much of him?' The reply was,
'Men do not look into running water as a mirror, but into still water;--it is
only the still water that can arrest them all, and keep them (in the contemplation
of their real selves). Of things which are what they are by the influence of
the earth, it is only the pine and cypress which are the best instances;-in
winter as in summer brightly green[2]. Of those which were what they were by
the influence of Heaven[3], the most correct examples were Yâo and Shun; fortunate
in (thus) maintaining their own life correct, and so as to correct the lives
of others.

'As a verification of the (power of) the original endowment, when it has been
preserved, take the result of fearlessness,-how the heroic spirit of a single
brave soldier has been thrown into an army of nine hosts[4]. If a man only seeking
for fame and able in this way to secure it can produce such an effect, how much
more (may we look for a greater

[1. Wang Thâi saw all things in the Tâo, and the Tâo in all
things. Comp. Book XI, par. 7, et al.

2. Notwithstanding his being a cripple. He forgets that circumstance
himself, and all others forget it, constrained and won by his embodiment of
the Tâo. What follows is an illustration of this, exaggerated indeed, but not
so extravagantly as in many other passages.

3. In the Tâoistic meaning of the term.

4. The royal army consisted of six hosts; that of a great feudal
prince of three. 'Nine hosts' = a very great army.]

{p. 226}

result) from one whose rule is over heaven and earth, and holds all things
in his treasury, who simply has his lodging in the six members[1] of his body,
whom his ears and eyes serve but as conveying emblematic images of things, who
comprehends all his knowledge in a unity, and whose mind never dies! If such
a man were to choose a day on which he would ascend far on high, men would (seek
to) follow him there. But how should he be willing to occupy himself with other
men?'

2. Shän-thû Kîa[2] was (another) man who had lost his feet. Along with
dze-khân[3] of Käng[3] he studied under the master Po-hwän Wû-zän[4].
Dze-khân said to him (one day), 'If I go out first, do you remain behind; and
if you go out first, I will remain behind.' Next day they were again sitting
together on the same mat in the hall, when Dze-khân spoke the same words to
him, adding,' Now I am about to go out; will you stay behind or not? Moreover,
when you see one of official rank (like myself), you do not try to get out of
his way;-do you consider yourself equal to one of official rank?' Shän-thû
Kîa replied, 'In our Master's school is there indeed such recognition required
of official rank? You are one, Sir, whose pleasure is in your official rank,
and would therefore take precedence of other men. I

[1. The arms, legs, head, and trunk.

2. Another cripple introduced by our author to serve his purpose.

3. Kung-sun Khiâo; a good and able minister of Kang, an earldom
forming part of the present Ho-nan. He was a contemporary of Confucius, who
wept when he heard of his death in B. C. 522. He was a scion of the ruling house,
which again was a branch of the royal family of Kâu.

4. A Tâoist teacher. See XXI, par. 9; XXXII, par. 1.]

{p. 227}

have heard that when a mirror is bright, the dust does not rest on it; when
dust rests on it the mirror is not bright. When one dwells long with a man of
ability and virtue, he comes to be without error. There now is our teacher whom
you have chosen to make you greater than you are; and when you still talk in
this way, are you not in error?' Dze-khân rejoined, 'A (shattered) object as
you are, you would still strive to make yourself out as good as Yâo! If I may
form an estimate of your virtue, might it not be sufficient to lead you to the
examination of yourself?' The other said, 'Most criminals, in describing their
offences, would make it out that they ought not to have lost (their feet) for
them; few would describe them so as to make it appear that they should not have
preserved their feet. They are only the virtuous who know that such a calamity
was unavoidable, and therefore rest in it as what was appointed for them. When
men stand before (an archer like) Î[1] with his bent bow, if they are in the
middle of his field, that is the place where they should be hit; and if they
be not hit, that also was appointed. There are many with their feet entire who
laugh at me because I have lost my feet, which makes me feel vexed and angry.
But when I go to our teacher, I throw off that feeling, and return (to a better
mood);--he has washed, without my knowing it, the other from me by (his instructions
in) what is good. I have attended him now for nineteen years, and have not known
that I am without my feet. Now, you, Sir, and I have for the object of our study
the

[1. A famous archer of antiquity in the twenty-second century
B.C., or perhaps earlier.]

{p. 228}

(virtue) which is internal, and not an adjunct of the body, and yet you are
continually directing your attention to my external body;--are you not wrong
in this?' Dze-khân felt uneasy, altered his manner and looks, and said, 'You
need not, Sir, say anything more about it.'

3. In Lû there was a cripple, called Shû-shan the Toeless[1], who
came on his heels to see Kung-nî. Kung-nî said to him, 'By your want of circumspection
in the past, Sir, you have incurred such a calamity;--of what use is your coming
to me now?' Toeless said, 'Through my ignorance of my proper business and taking
too little care of my body, I came to lose my feet. But now I am come to you,
still possessing what is more honourable than my feet, and which therefore I
am anxious to preserve entire. There is nothing which Heaven does not cover,
and nothing which Earth does not sustain; you, Master, were regarded by me as
doing the part of Heaven and Earth;--how could I know that you would receive
me in such a way?' Confucius rejoined, 'I am but a poor creature. But why, my
master, do you not come inside, where I will try to tell you what I have learned?'
When Toeless had gone out, Confucius said, 'Be stimulated to effort, my disciples.
This toeless cripple is still anxious to learn to make up for the evil of his
former conduct;--how much more should those be so whose conduct has been unchallenged!'

Mr. Toeless, however, told Lâo Tan (of the interview),

[1. 'Toeless' is a sort of nickname. Shû-shan or Shû
hill was, probably, where he dwelt:--'Toeless of Shû hill.']

{p. 229}

saying, 'Khung Khiû, I apprehend, has not yet attained to be a Perfect
man. What has he to do with keeping a crowd of disciples around him? He is seeking
to have the reputation of being an extraordinary and marvellous man, and does
not know that the Perfect man considers this to be as handcuffs and fetters
to him.' Lâo Tan said, 'Why did you not simply lead him to see the unity of
life and death, and that the admissible and inadmissible belong to one category,
so freeing him from his fetters? Would this be possible?' Toeless said, 'It
is the punishment inflicted on him by Heaven[1]. How can he be freed from it?'

4. Duke Âi of Lû[2] asked Kung-nî, saying, 'There was an ugly man in
Wei, called Âi-thâi Tho[3] . His father-in-law, who lived with him, thought
so much of him that he could not be away from him. His wife, when she saw him
(ugly as he was), represented to her parents, saying, "I had more than ten times
rather be his concubine than the wife of any other man[4]." He was never heard
to take the lead in discussion, but always seemed to be of the same opinion
with others. He had not the position of a ruler, so as to be able to save men
from death. He had no revenues, so as to be able to satisfy men's craving for
food. He was ugly enough, moreover, to scare

[1. 'Heaven' here is a synonym of Tâo. Perhaps the meaning is
'unavoidable;' it is so in the Tâoistic order of things.

2. It was in the sixteenth year of duke Âi that Confucius died.
Âi was marquis of Lû from B.C. 494 to 468.

3 The account of Âi-thâi Tho is of course Kwang-dze's own fabrication.
Âi-thâi is understood to be descriptive of his ugliness, and Tho to be his name.

4 Perhaps this was spoken by his wife before their marriage.]

{p. 230}

the whole world. He agreed with men instead of trying to lead them to adopt
his views; his knowledge did not go beyond his immediate neighbourhood[1]. And
yet his father-in-law and his wife were of one mind about him in his presence
(as I have said);--he must have been different from other men. I called him,
and saw him. Certainly he was ugly enough to scare the whole world. He had not
lived with me, however. for many months, when I was drawn to the man; and before
he had been with me a full year, I had confidence in him. The state being without
a chief minister, I (was minded) to commit the government to him. He responded
to my proposal sorrowfully, and looked undecided as if he would fain have declined
it. I was ashamed of myself (as inferior to him), but finally gave the government
into his hands. In a little time, however, he left me and went away. I was sorry
and felt that I had sustained a loss, and as if there were no other to share
the pleasures of the kingdom with me. What sort of man was he?'

Kung-nî said, 'Once when I was sent on a mission to Khû, I saw some pigs
sucking at their dead mother. After a little they looked with rapid glances,
when they all left her, and ran away. They felt that she did not see them, and
that she was no longer like themselves. What they had loved in their mother
was not her bodily figure, but what had given animation to her figure. When
a man dies in battle, they do not at his interment employ the usual appendages

[1. One sees dimly the applicability of this illustration to
the case in hand. What made Âi-thâi Tho so much esteemed was his mental power,
quite independent of his ugly person.]

{p. 231}

of plumes[1]: as to supplying shoes to one who has lost his feet, there is
no reason why he should care for them;--in neither case is there the proper
reason for their use'. The members of the royal harem do not pare their nails
nor pierce their ears[2]; when a man is newly married, he remains (for a time)
absent from his official duties, and unoccupied with them[2]. That their bodies
might be perfect was sufficient to make them thus dealt with;--how much greater
results should be expected from men whose mental gifts are perfect! This Âi-thâi
Tho was believed by men, though he did not speak a word, and was loved by them,
though he did no special service for them. He made men appoint him to the government
of their states, afraid only that he would not accept the appointment. He must
have been a man whose powers[3] were perfect, though his realisation of them[3]
was not manifested in his person.'

Duke Âi said, 'What is meant by saying that his powers were complete?' Kung-nî
replied, 'Death and life, preservation and ruin, failure and success, poverty
and wealth, superiority and inferiority, blame and praise, hunger and thirst,
cold and heat;--these are the changes of circumstances, the operation of our
appointed lot. Day and night they succeed to one another before us, but there
is no wisdom

[1. See the Lî Kî VIII, i, 7; but the applicability of these
two illustrations is not so clear.

2. These two have force as in 'reasoning from the less to t
e greater.' With the latter of the two compare the mosaical provision in Deuteronomy
xxiv. 5.

3. 'Powers' are the capacities of the nature,--the gift of the
Tâo. 'Virtue' is the realisation or carrying out of those capacities.]

{p. 232}

able to discover to what they owe their origination. They are not sufficient
therefore to disturb the harmony (of the nature), and are not allowed to enter
into the treasury of intelligence. To cause this harmony and satisfaction ever
to be diffused, while the feeling of pleasure is not lost from the mind; to
allow no break to arise in this state day or night, so that it is always spring-time[1]
in his relations with external things; in all his experiences to realise in
his mind what is appropriate to each season (of the year)[2]:--these are the
characteristics of him whose powers are perfect.'

'And what do you mean by the realisation of these powers not being manifested
in the person?' (pursued further the duke). The reply was, 'There is nothing
so level as the surface of a pool of still water. It may serve as an example
of what I mean. All within its circuit is preserved (in peace), and there comes
to it no agitation from without. The virtuous efficacy is the perfect cultivation
of the harmony (of the nature). Though the realisation of this be not manifested
in the person, things cannot separate themselves (from its influence).'

Some days afterwards duke Âi told this conversation to Min-dze[3], saying,
'Formerly it seemed to me the work of the sovereign to stand in court with his
face to the south, to rule the kingdom, and to pay good heed to the accounts
of the people concerned, lest any should come to a (miserable) death;--this

[1. Specially the season of complacent enjoyment.

2. So, in Lin Hsî-kung; but the meaning has to be forced out
of the text.

3. The disciple Min Sun or Min Dze-Khien.]

{p. 233}

I considered to be the sum (of his duty). Now that I have heard that description
of the Perfect man, I fear that my idea is not the real one, and that, by employing
myself too lightly, I may cause the ruin of my state. I and Khung Khiû
are not on the footing of ruler and subject, but on that of a virtuous friendship.'

5. A person who had no lips, whose legs were bent so that he could only walk
on his toes, and who was (otherwise) deformed[1], addressed his counsels to
duke Ling of Wei, who was so pleased with him, that he looked on a perfectly
formed man as having a lean and small neck in comparison with him. Another who
had a large goitre like an earthenware jar[1] addressed his counsels to duke
Hwan of Khî[2], who was so pleased with him that he looked on a perfectly formed
man as having a neck lean and small in comparison with him[3]. So it is that
when one's virtue is extraordinary, (any deficiency in) his bodily form may
be forgotten. When men do not forget what is (easily) forgotten, and forget
what is not (easily) forgotten, we have a case of real oblivion. Therefore the
sagely man has that in which his mind finds its enjoyment, and (looks on) wisdom
as (but) the shoots from an old stump; agreements with others are to him but
so much glue; kindnesses are

[1. These two men are undoubtedly inventions of Kwang-dze. They
are brought before us, not by surnames and names, but by their several deformities.

2. The first of the five presiding chiefs; marquis of Khî from
B.C. 685 to 643.

3. Lin Hsî-kung wonders whether the story of the man who was
so taken with the charms of a one-eyed courtesan, that he thought other women
all had an eye too many, was taken from this!]

{p. 234}

(but the arts of) intercourse; and great skill is (but as) merchants' wares.
The sagely man lays no plans;--of what use would wisdom be to him? He has no
cutting and hacking to do;--of what use would glue be to him? He has lost nothing;
of what use would arts of intercourse be to him? He has no goods to dispose
of;--what need has he to play the merchant? (The want of) these four things
are the nourishment of (his) Heavenly (nature); that nourishment is its Heavenly
food. Since he receives this food from Heaven, what need has he for anything
of man's (devising)? He has the bodily form of man, but not the passions and
desires of (other) men. He has the form of man, and therefore he is a man. Being
without the passions and desires of men, their approvings and disapprovings
are not to be found in him. How insignificant and small is (the body) by which
he belongs to humanity! How grand and great is he in the unique perfection of
his Heavenly (nature)!

Hui-dze said to Kwang-dze, 'Can a man indeed be without desires and passions?'
The reply was, 'He can.' 'But on what grounds do you call him a man, who is
thus without passions and desires?' Kwang-dze said, 'The Tâo[1] gives him his
personal appearance (and powers); Heaven[2] gives him his bodily form; how should
we not call him a man?' Hui-dze rejoined, 'Since you call him a man, how

[1. Lû Shû-kih maintains here that 'the Tâo' and
'Heaven' have the same meaning; nor does he make any distinction between mâo
(###), 'the personal appearance,' and hsing (###), 'the figure' or 'bodily form.'

2. Compare in the Tâo Teh King expressions in li, 2, and lv,
5.]

{p. 235}

can he be without passions and desires?' The reply was, 'You are misunderstanding
what I mean by passions and desires. What I mean when I say that he is without
these is, that this man does not by his likings and dislikings do any inward
harm to his body;--he always pursues his course without effort, and does not
(try to) increase his (store of) life.' Hui-dze rejoined, 'If there were not
that increasing of (the amount) of life, how would he get his body'?' Kwang-dze
said, 'The Tâo gives him his personal appearance (and powers); Heaven gives
him his bodily form; and he does not by his likings and dislikings do any internal
harm to his body. But now you, Sir, deal with your spirit as if it were something
external to you, and subject your vital powers to toil. You sing (your ditties),
leaning against a tree; you go to sleep, grasping the stump of a rotten dryandra
tree. Heaven selected for you the bodily form (of a man), and you babble about
what is strong and what is white[2].'

2 Kwang-dze beats down his opponent, and contemptuously refers
to some of his well-known peculiarities;--as in II, par. 5, XXXIII, par. 7,
and elsewhere.]

{p. 236}

BOOK VI.

PART I. SECTION VI.

Tâ Zung Shih, or 'The Great and Most Honoured Master[1].'

1. He who knows the part which the Heavenly[2] (in him) plays, and knows(also)that
which the Human[2] (in him ought to) play, has reached the perfection (of knowledge).
He who knows the part which the Heavenly plays (knows) that it is naturally
born with him; he who knows the part which the Human ought to play (proceeds)
with the knowledge which he possesses to nourish it in the direction of what
he does not (yet) know[3]:--to complete one's natural term of years and not
come to an untimely end in the middle of his course is the fulness of knowledge.
Although it be so, there is an evil (attending this condition). Such knowledge
still awaits the confirmation of it as correct; it does so because it is not
yet determined[4]. How do we know that what

[1. See pp. 134-136.

2. Both 'Heaven' and 'Man' here are used in the Tâoistic sense;--the
meaning which the terms commonly have both with Lao and Kwang.

3. The middle member of this sentence is said to be the practical
outcome of all that is said in the Book; conducting the student of the Tâo to
an unquestioning submission to the experiences in his lot, which are beyond
his comprehension, and approaching nearly to what we understand by the Christian
virtue of Faith.

4. That is, there may be the conflict, to the end of life, between
{footnote p. 237} faith and fact, so graphically exhibited in the Book of job,
and compendiously described in the seventy-third Psalm.]

{p. 237}

we call the Heavenly (in us) is not the Human? and that what we call the Human
is not the Heavenly? There must be the True man[1], and then there is the True
knowledge.

2. What is meant by 'the True Man[2]?' The True men of old did not reject (the
views of) the few; they did not seek to accomplish (their ends) like heroes
(before others); they did not lay plans to attain those ends[3]. Being such,
though they might make mistakes, they had no occasion for repentance; though
they might succeed, they had no self-complacency. Being such, they could ascend
the loftiest heights without fear; they could pass through water without being
made wet by it; they could go into fire without being burnt; so it was

[1. Here we meet with the True Man, a Master of the Tâo. He
is the same as the Perfect Man, the Spirit-like Man, and the Sagely Man (see
pp. 127, 128), and the designation is sometimes interchanged in the five paragraphs
that follow with 'the Sagely Man.' Mr. Balfour says here that this name 'is
used in the esoteric sense,--"partaking of the essence of divinity;"' and he
accordingly translates ### by 'the divine man.' But he might as well translate
any one of the other three names in the same way. The Shwo Wän dictionary defines
the name by ###, 'a recluse of the mountain, whose bodily form has been changed,
and who ascends to heaven;' but when this account was made, Tâoism had entered
into a new phase, different from what it had in the time of our author.

2. In this description of 'the True Man,' and in what follows,
there is what is grotesque and what is exaggerated (see note on the title of
the first Book, p. 127). The most prominent characteristic of him was his perfect
comprehension of the Tâo and participation of it.

3. ### has here the sense of ###.]

{p. 238}

that by their knowledge they ascended to and reached the Tâo[1].

The True men of old did not dream when they slept, had no anxiety when they
awoke, and did not care that their food should be pleasant. Their breathing
came deep and silently. The breathing of the true man comes (even) from his
heels, while men generally breathe (only) from their throats. When men are defeated
in argument, their words come from their gullets as if they were vomiting. Where
lusts and desires are deep, the springs of the Heavenly are shallow.

The True men of old knew nothing of the love of life or of the hatred of death.
Entrance into life occasioned them no joy; the exit from it awakened no resistance.
Composedly they went and came. They did not forget what their beginning had
been, and they did not inquire into what their end would be. They accepted (their
life) and rejoiced in it; they forgot (all fear of death), and returned (to
their state before life)[1]. Thus there was in them what is called the want
of any mind to resist the Tâo, and of all attempts by means of the Human to
assist the Heavenly. Such were they who are called the True men.

3. Being such, their minds were free from all thought[2]; their demeanour was
still and unmoved;

[1. Was not this the state of non-existence? We cannot say of
Pantâoism. However we may describe that, the Tâo operates in nature, but is
not identical with it.

2, ### appears in the common editions as ###, which must have
got into the text at a very early time. 'The mind forgetting,' or 'free from
all thought and purpose,' appears everywhere {footnote p. 239} in the Book as
a characteristic of the True Man. Not a few critics contend that it was this,
and not the Tâo of which it is a quality, that Kwang-dze intended by the 'Master'
in the title.]

{p. 239}

their foreheads beamed simplicity. Whatever coldness came from them was like
that of autumn; whatever warmth came from them was like that of spring. Their
joy and anger assimilated to what we see in the four seasons. They did in regard
to all things what was suitable, and no one could know how far their action
would go. Therefore the sagely man might, in his conduct of war, destroy a state
without losing the hearts of the people[1]; his benefits and favours might extend
to a myriad generations without his being a lover of men. Hence he who tries
to share his joys with others is not a sagely man; he who manifests affection
is not benevolent; he who observes times and seasons (to regulate his conduct)
is not a man of wisdom; he to whom profit and injury are not the same is not
a superior man; he who acts for the sake of the name of doing so, and loses
his (proper) self is not the (right) scholar; and he who throws away his person
in a way which is not the true (way) cannot command the service of others. Such
men as Hû Pû-kieh, Wû Kwang, Po-î, Shû-khî, the count
of Kî, Hsü-yü, Kî Thâ, and Shän-thû Tî, all did service for other men,
and sought to secure for them what they desired, not seeking their own pleasure[2].

[1. Such antithetic statements are startling, but they are common
with both Lâo-dze and our author.

2. The seven men mentioned here are all adduced, I must suppose,
as instances of good and worthy men, but still inferior to the True Man. Of
Hû Pû-kieh all that we are told is that he was 'an ancient worthy.'
One account of Wû Kwang is that he {footnote p. 240} was of the time of
Hwang-Tî, with ears seven inches long; another, that he was of the time of Thang,
of the Shang dynasty. Po-î and Shû-khî are known to us from the Analects;
and also the count of Khî, whose name, it is said, was Hsü-yü. I can find nothing
about Kî Thâ;--his name in Ziâo Hung's text is ### Shän-thû Tî was of
the Yin dynasty, a contemporary of Thang. He drowned himself in the Ho. Most
of these are referred to in other places.]

{p. 240}

4. The True men of old presented the aspect of judging others aright, but without
being partisans; of feeling their own insufficiency, but being without flattery
or cringing. Their peculiarities were natural to them, but they were not obstinately
attached to them; their humility was evident, but there was nothing of unreality
or display about it. Their placidity and satisfaction had the appearance of
joy; their every movement seemed to be a necessity to them. Their accumulated
attractiveness drew men's looks to them; their blandness fixed men's attachment
to their virtue. They seemed to accommodate themselves to the (manners of their
age), but with a certain severity; their haughty indifference was beyond its
control. Unceasing seemed their endeavours to keep (their mouths) shut; when
they looked down, they had forgotten what they wished to say.

They considered punishments to be the substance (of government, and they never
incurred it); ceremonies to be its supporting wings (and they always observed
them); wisdom (to indicate) the time (for action, and they always selected it);
and virtue to be accordance (with others), and they were all-accordant. Considering
punishments to be the substance (of government), yet their generosity appeared
in the (manner of their) infliction of death. Considering ceremonies to be its
supporting wings, they pursued

{p. 241}

by means of them their course in the world. Considering wisdom to indicate
the time (for action), they felt it necessary to employ it in (the direction
of) affairs. Considering virtue to be accordance (with others), they sought
to ascend its height along with all who had feet (to climb it). (Such were they),
and yet men really thought that they did what they did by earnest effort[1].

5. In this way they were one and the same in all their likings and dislikings.
Where they liked, they were the same; where they did not like, they were the
same. In the former case where they liked, they were fellow-workers with the
Heavenly (in them); in the latter where they disliked, they were coworkers with
the Human in them. The one of these elements (in their nature) did not overcome
the other. Such were those who are called the True men.

Death and life are ordained, just as we have the constant succession of night
and day;--in both cases from Heaven. Men have no power to do anything in reference
to them;--such is the constitution of things[2]. There are those who specially
regard Heaven[3] as their father, and they still love It (distant as It is)[3];--how
much more should they love

[1. All this paragraph is taken as illustrative of the True
man's freedom from thought or purpose in his course.

2. See note 3 on par. 1, p. 236.

3. Love is due to a parent, and so such persons should love
Heaven. There is in the text here, I think, an unconscious reference to the
earliest time, before the views of the earliest Chinese diverged to Theism and
Tâoism. We cannot translate the ### here.]

{p. 242}

That which stands out (Superior and Alone)[1]! Some specially regard their
ruler as superior to themselves, and will give their bodies to die for him;
how much more should they do so for That which is their true (Ruler)[1]! When
the springs are dried up, the fishes collect together on the land. Than that
they should moisten one another there by the damp about them, and keep one another
wet by their slime, it would be better for them to forget one another in the
rivers and lakes[2]. And when men praise Yâo and condemn Kieh, it would be better
to forget them both, and seek the renovation of the Tâo.

6. There is the great Mass (of nature);--I find the support of my body on it;
my life is spent in toil on it; my old age seeks ease on it; at death I find
rest in it;--what makes my life a good makes my death also a good[3]. If you
hide away a boat in the ravine of a hill, and hide away the hill in a lake,
you will say that (the boat) is secure; but at midnight there shall come a strong
man and carry it off on his back, while you in the dark know nothing about it.
You may hide away anything, whether small or great, in the most suitable place,
and yet it shall disappear from it. But if you could hide the world in the world[4],
so that there was nowhere to which it could be removed, this would be the grand
reality of the

[1. The great and most honoured Master,--the Tâo.

2. This sentence contrasts the cramping effect on the mind of
Confucianism with the freedom given by the doctrine of the Tâo.

3. The Tâo does this. The whole paragraph is an amplification
of the view given in the preceding note.

4 The Tâo cannot be taken away. It is with its possessor, an
ever-during thing.']

{p. 243}

ever-during Thing[1]. When the body of man comes from its special mould[2],
there is even then occasion for joy; but this body undergoes a myriad transformations,
and does not immediately reach its perfection;--does it not thus afford occasion
for joys incalculable? Therefore the sagely man enjoys himself in that from
which there is no possibility of separation, and by which all things are preserved.
He considers early death or old age, his beginning and his ending, all to be
good, and in this other men imitate him;--how much more will they do so in regard
to That Itself on which all things depend, and from which every transformation
arises!

7. This is the Tâo;--there is in It emotion and sincerity, but It does nothing
and has no bodily form[3]. It may be handed down (by the teacher), but may not
be received (by his scholars). It may be apprehended (by the mind), but It cannot
be seen. It has Its root and ground (of existence) in Itself. Before there were
heaven and earth, from of old, there It was, securely existing. From It came
the mysterious existences of spirits, from It the mysterious existence of God[4].
It produced heaven; It produced earth. It was before the Thâi-kî[5], and

[1. See p. 242, note 4.

2. Adopting the reading of ### for ###, supplied by Hwâi-nan
dze.

3. Our author has done with 'the True Man,' and now brings in
the Tâo itself as his subject. Compare the predicates of It here with Bk. II,
par. 2. But there are other, and perhaps higher, things said of it here.

4. Men at a very early time came to believe in the existence
of their spirits after death, and in the existence of a Supreme Ruler or God.
It vas to the Tâo that those concepts were owing.

5. The primal ether out of which all things were fashioned by
the interaction of the Yin and Yang. This was something like the {footnote p.
244} current idea of protoplasm; but while protoplasm lies down in the lower
parts of the earth, the Thâi-kî was imagined to be in the higher regions of
space.]

{p. 244}

yet could not be considered high[1]; It was below all space, and yet could
not be considered deep[1]. It was produced before heaven and earth, and yet
could not be considered to have existed long[1]; It was older than the highest
antiquity, and yet could not be considered old[1].

Shih-wei got It[2], and by It adjusted heaven and earth. Fû-hsî got It,
and by It penetrated to the mystery of the maternity of the primary matter.
The Wei-tâu[3] got It, and from all antiquity has made no eccentric movement.
The Sun and Moon got It, and from all antiquity have not intermitted (their
bright shining). Khan-pei got It, and by It became lord of Khwän-lun[4]. Fäng-î[5]
got It, and by It enjoyed himself in the Great River. Kien Wû[6] got It,
and by It dwelt on mount Thâi. Hwang-Tî[7] got It, and by It ascended the cloudy
sky. Kwan-hsü[8]

[1. The Tâo is independent both of space and time.

2. A prehistoric sovereign.

3. A name for the constellation of the Great Bear.

4. Name of the spirit of the Khwan-lun mountains in Thibet,
the fairy-land of Tâoist writers, very much in Tâoism what mount Sumêru
is in Buddhism.

6. Appears here as the spirit of mount Thâi, the great eastern
mountain; we met with him in I, 5, but simply as one of Kwang-dze's fictitious
personages.

7. Appears before in Bk. II; the first of Sze-mâ Khien's 'Five
Tîs;' no doubt a very early sovereign, to whom many important discoveries and
inventions are ascribed; is placed by many at the head of Tâoism itself.

The second of the 'Five Tîs;' a grandson of Hwang-Tî. I do not
know what to say of his 'Dark Palace.']

{p. 245}

got It, and by It dwelt in the Dark Palace. Yü-khiang[1] got It, and by It
was set on the North Pole. Hsî Wang-mû[2] got It, and by It had her seat
in (the palace of) Shâo-kwang. No one knows Its beginning; no one knows Its
end. Phäng Zû got It, and lived on from the time of the lord of Yü to
that of the Five Chiefs[3]. Fû Yüeh[4] got It, and by It became chief
minister to Wû-ting[4], (who thus) in a trice became master of the kingdom.
(After his death), Fû Yüeh mounted to the eastern portion of the Milky
Way, where, riding on Sagittarius and Scorpio, he took his place among the stars.

8. Nan-po Dze-khwei[1], asked Nü Yü[1], saying, 'You are old, Sir, while your
complexion is like that of a child;--how is it so?' The reply was, 'I have become
acquainted with the Tâo.' The other said, 'Can I learn the Tâo?' Nü Yü said,
'No. How can you? You, Sir, are not the man to do so. There was Pû-liang
Î[7] who had the abilities of a sagely man, but not the Tâo, while I had the
Tâo, but not the abilities. I wished, however, to teach him, if, peradventure,
he might

[1. The Spirit of the Northern regions, with a man's face, and
a bird's body, &c.

2. A queen of the Genii on mount Khwän-lun. See Mayers's Manual,
pp. 178, 179.

3. Phäng Zû has been before us in Bk. I. Shun is intended
by 'the Lord of Yü.' The five Chiefs;--see Mencius, VI, ii, 7.

4. See the Shû, IV, viii; but we have nothing there of
course about the Milky Way and the stars.--This passage certainly lessens our
confidence in Kwang-dze's statements.

5. Perhaps the same as Nan-po Dze-khî in Bk. IV, par. 7.

6. Must have been a great Tâoist. Nothing more can be said of
him or her.

7. Only mentioned here.]

{p. 246}

become the sagely man indeed. If he should not do so, it was easy (I thought)
for one possessing the Tâo of the sagely man to communicate it to another possessing
his abilities. Accordingly, I proceeded to do so, but with deliberation[1].
After three days, he was able to banish from his mind all worldly (matters).
This accomplished, I continued my intercourse with him in the same way; and
in seven days he was able to banish from his mind all thought of men and things.
This accomplished, and my instructions continued, after nine days, he was able
to count his life as foreign to himself. This accomplished, his mind was afterwards
clear as the morning; and after this he was able to see his own individuality[2].
That individuality perceived, he was able to banish all thought of Past or Present.
Freed from this, he was able to penetrate to (the truth that there is no difference
between) life and death;--(how) the destruction of life is not dying, and the
communication of other life is not living. (The Tâo) is a thing which accompanies
all other things and meets them, which is present when they are overthrown and
when they obtain their completion. Its name is Tranquillity amid all Disturbances,
meaning that such Disturbances lead to Its Perfection[3].'

'And how did you, being alone (without any teacher), learn all this?' 'I learned
it,' was the reply, 'from the son of Fû-mo[4]; he learned it from

[1. So the ### is explained.

2. Standing by himself, as it were face to face with the Tâo.

3. Amid all changes, in life and death, the possessor of the
Tâo, has peace.

4. Meaning writings; literally, 'the son of the assisting pigment.'
{footnote p. 247} We are not to suppose that by this and the other names that
follow individuals are intended. Kwang-dze seems to have wished to give, in
his own fashion, some notion of the genesis of the idea of the Tâo from the
first speculations about the origin of things.]

{p. 247}

the grandson of Lo-sung; he learned it from Shan-ming; he learned it from Nieh-hsü;
he, from Hsü-yî; he, from Wû-âo; he, from Hsüan-ming; he, from Zhan-liâo;
and he learned it from Î-shih.'

9. Dze-sze[1], Dze-yü[1], Dze-1î[1], and Dze-lâi[1], these four men, were talking
together, when some one said, 'Who can suppose the head to be made from nothing,
the spine from life, and the rump-bone from death? Who knows how death and birth,
living on and disappearing, compose the one body?--I would be friends with him[2].'
The four men looked at one another and laughed, but no one seized with his mind
the drift of the questions. All, however, were friends together.

Not long after Dze-yü fell ill, and Dze-sze went to inquire for him. 'How great,'
said (the sufferer), 'is the Creator[3]! That He should have made me the deformed
object that I am!' He was a crooked hunchback; his five viscera were squeezed
into the

[1. We need not suppose that these are the names of real men.
They are brought on the stage by our author to serve his purpose. Hwâi-nan makes
the name of the first to have been Dze-shui (###).

2, Compare the same representation in Bk. XXIII, par. 10. Kû
Teh-kih says on it here, 'The head, the spine, the rump-bone mean simply the
head and tail, the beginning and end. All things begin from nothing and end
in nothing. Their birth and their death are only the creations of our thought,
the going and coming of the primary ether. When we have penetrated to the non-reality
of life and death, what remains of the body of so many feet?'

3. The 'Creator' or 'Maker' (###) is the Tâo.]

{p. 248}

upper part of his body; his chin bent over his navel; his shoulder was higher
than his crown; on his crown was an ulcer pointing to the sky; his breath came
and went in gasps[1]:--yet he was easy in his mind, and made no trouble of his
condition. He limped to a well, looked at himself in it, and said, 'Alas that
the Creator should have made me the deformed object that I am!' Dze said, 'Do
you dislike your condition?' He replied, 'No, why should I dislike it? If He
were to transform my left arm into a cock, I should be watching with it the
time of the night; if He were to transform my right arm into a cross-bow, I
should then be looking for a hsiâo to (bring down and) roast; if He were to
transform my rump-bone into a wheel, and my spirit into a horse, I should then
be mounting it, and would not change it for another steed. Moreover, when we
have got (what we are to do), there is the time (of life) in which to do it;
when we lose that (at death), submission (is what is required). When we rest
in what the time requires, and manifest that submission, neither joy nor sorrow
can find entrance (to the mind)[2]. This would be what the ancients called loosing
the cord by which (the life) is suspended. But one hung up cannot loose himself;--he
is held fast by his bonds[3]. And that creatures cannot overcome

[1. Compare this description of Dze-yü's deformity with that
of the poor Shû, in IV, 8.

2. Such is the submission to one's lot produced by the teaching
of Tâoism.

3. Compare the same phraseology in III, par. 4, near the end.
In correcting Mr. Balfour's mistranslation of the text, Mr. Giles himself falls
into a mistranslation through not observing that the ### is passive, having
the ### that precedes as its subject (observe the force of the ### after ###
in the best editions), and not active, or governing the ### that follows.]

{p. 249}

Heaven (the inevitable) is a long-acknowledged fact;-why should I hate my condition?'

10. Before long Dze-lâi fell ill, and lay gasping at the point of death, while
his wife and children stood around him wailing'. Dze-lî went to ask for him,
and said to them, 'Hush! Get out of the way! Do not disturb him as he is passing
through his change.' Then, leaning against the door, he said (to the dying man),
'Great indeed is the Creator! What will He now make you to become? Where will
He take you to? Will He make you the liver of a rat, or the arm of an insect[2]?

Dze-lâi replied, 'Wherever a parent tells a son to go, east, west, south, or
north, he simply follows the command. The Yin and Yang are more to a man than
his parents are. If they are hastening my death, and I do not quietly submit
to them, I shall be obstinate and rebellious. There is the great Mass (of nature);--I
find the support of my body in it; my life is spent in toil on it; my old age
seeks ease on it; at death I find rest on it:--what has made my life a good
will make my death also a good.

'Here now is a great founder, casting his metal. If the metal were to leap
up (in the pot), and say, "I must be made into a (sword like the) Mo-yeh[3]."

[1. Compare the account of the scene at Lâo-dze's death, in
III, par. 4.

2. Here comes in the belief in transformation.

3. The name of a famous sword, made for Ho-lü, the king of {footnote
p. 250} Wû (B. C. 514-494). See the account of the forging of it in the
###, ch. 74. The mention of it would seem to indicate that Dze-lâi and the other
three men were of the time of Confucius.]

{p. 250}

the great founder would be sure to regard it as uncanny. So, again, when a
form is being fashioned in the mould of the womb, if it were to say, "I must
become a man; I must become a man," the Creator would be sure to regard it as
uncanny. When we once understand that heaven and earth are a great melting-pot,
and the Creator a great founder, where can we have to go to that shall not be
right for us? We are born as from a quiet sleep, and we die to a calm awaking.'

11. Dze-sang Hû[1], Mäng Dze-fan[1], and Dze-khin Kang[1], these three
men, were friends together. (One of them said), 'Who can associate together
without any (thought of) such association, or act together without any (evidence
of) such co-operation? Who can mount up into the sky and enjoy himself amidst
the mists, disporting beyond the utmost limits (of things)[2], and forgetting
all others as if this were living, and would have no end?' The three men looked
at one another and laughed, not perceiving the drift of the questions; and they
continued to associate together as friends.

Suddenly, after a time[3], Dze-sang Hia died. Before he was buried, Confucius
heard of the event, and

[1. These three men were undoubtedly of the time of Confucius,
and some would identify them with the Dze-sang Po-dze of Ana. VI, i, Mäng Kih-fan
of VI, 13, and the Lâo of IX, vi, 4. This is very unlikely. They were Tâoists.

2. Or, 'without end.'

3. Or, 'Some time went by silently, and.']

{p. 251}

sent Dze-kung to go and see if he could render any assistance. One of the survivors
had composed a ditty, and the other was playing on his lute. Then they sang
together in unison,

Dze-kung hastened forward to them, and said, 'I venture to ask whether it be
according to the rules to be singing thus in the presence of the corpse?' The
two men looked at each other, and laughed, saying, 'What does this man know
about the idea that underlies (our) rules?' Dze-kung returned to Confucius,
and reported to him, saying, 'What sort of men are those? They had made none
of the usual preparations[2], and treated the body as a thing foreign to them.
They were singing in the presence of the corpse, and there was no change in
their countenances. I cannot describe them;--what sort of men are they?' Confucius
replied, 'Those men occupy and enjoy themselves in what is outside the (common)
ways (of the world), while I occupy and enjoy myself in what lies within those
ways. There is no common ground for those of such different ways; and when 1
sent you to condole with those men, I was acting stupidly. They, moreover, make
man to be the fellow of the

[1. In accordance with the ancient and modern practice in China
of calling the dead back. But these were doing so in a song to the lute.

2. Or, 'they do not regulate their doings (in the usual way).']

{p. 252}

Creator, and seek their enjoyment in the formless condition of heaven and earth.
They consider life to be an appendage attached, an excrescence annexed to them,
and death to be a separation of the appendage and a dispersion of the contents
of the excrescence. With these views, how should they know wherein death and
life are to be found, or what is first and what is last? They borrow different
substances, and pretend that the common form of the body is composed of them[1].
They dismiss the thought of (its inward constituents like) the liver and gall,
and (its outward constituents), the ears and eyes. Again and again they end
and they begin, having no knowledge of first principles. They occupy themselves
ignorantly and vaguely with what (they say) lies outside the dust and dirt (of
the world), and seek their enjoyment in the business of doing nothing. How should
they confusedly address themselves to the ceremonies practised by the common
people, and exhibit themselves as doing so to the ears and eyes of the multitude?'

Dze-kung said, 'Yes, but why do you, Master, act according to the (common)
ways (of the world)?' The reply was, 'I am in this under the condemning sentence
of Heaven[2]. Nevertheless, I will share

[1. The idea that the body is composed of the elements of earth,
wind or air, fire, and water.

2. A strange description of himself by the sage. Literally,
'I am (one of) the people killed and exposed to public view by Heaven;' referring,
perhaps, to the description of a living man as 'suspended by a string from God.'
Confucius was content to accept his life, and used it in pursuing the path of
duty, according to his conception of it, without aiming at the transcendental
method of the Tâoists. I can attach no other or better meaning to the expression.]

{p. 253}

with you (what I have attained to).' Dze-kung rejoined, 'I venture to ask the
method which you pursue;' and Confucius said, 'Fishes breed and grow in the
water; man developes {sic--jbh} in the Tâo. Growing in the water, the
fishes cleave the pools, and their nourishment is supplied to them. Developing
in the Tâo, men do nothing, and the enjoyment of their life is secured. Hence
it is said, "Fishes forget one another in the rivers and lakes; men forget one
another in the arts of the Tâo."'

Dze-kung said, 'I venture to ask about the man who stands aloof from others[1].'
The reply was, 'He stands aloof from other men, but he is in accord with Heaven!
Hence it is said, "The small man of Heaven is the superior man among men; the
superior man among men is the small man of Heaven[2]!"'

12. Yen Hui asked Kung-nî, saying, 'When the mother of Mäng-sun Zhâi[3] died,
in all his wailing for her he did not shed a tear; in the core of his heart
he felt no distress; during all the mourning rites, he exhibited no sorrow.
Without these three things, he (was considered to have) discharged his mourning
well;--is it that in the state of Lû one who has not the reality may yet
get the reputation of having it? I think the matter very strange.' Kung-nî

2. Here, however, he aptly compares with the language of Christ
in Matthew vii. 28.--Kwang-dze seems to make Confucius praise the system of
Tâoism as better than his own!

3. Must have been a member of the Ming or Ming-sun family of
Lû, to a branch of which Mencius belonged.]

{p. 254}

said, 'That Mäng-sun carried out (his views) to the utmost. He was advanced
in knowledge; but (in this case) it was not possible for him to appear to be
negligent (in his ceremonial observances)[1], but he succeeded in being really
so to himself Mäng-sun does not know either what purposes life serves, or what
death serves; he does not know which should be first sought, and which last[2].
If he is to be transformed into something else, he will simply await the transformation
which he does not yet know. This is all he does. And moreover, when one is about
to undergo his change, how does he know that it has not taken place? And when
he is not about to undergo his change, how does he know that it has taken place[3]?
Take the case of me and you:--are we in a dream from which we have not begun
to awake[4]?

'Moreover, Mäng-sun presented in his body the appearance of being agitated,
but in his mind he was conscious of no loss. The death was to him like the issuing
from one's dwelling at dawn, and no (more terrible) reality. He was more awake
than others were. When they wailed, he also wailed, having in himself the reason
why he did so. And we all have our individuality which makes us what we are
as compared together; but how do we know that we

[1. The people set such store by the mourning rites, that Mäng-sun
felt he must present the appearance of observing them. This would seem to show
that Tâoism arose after the earlier views of the Chinese.

2. I adopt here, with many of the critics, the reading of ###
instead of the more common ###.

3. This is to me very obscure.

4. Are such dreams possible? See what I have said on II, par.
9.]

{p. 255}

determine in any case correctly that individuality? Moreover you dream that
you are a bird, and seem to be soaring to the sky; or that you are a fish, and
seem to be diving in the deep. But you do not know whether we that are now speaking
are awake or in a dream[1]. It is not the meeting with what is pleasurable that
produces the smile; it is not the smile suddenly produced that produces the
arrangement (of the person). When one rests in what has been arranged, and puts
away all thought of the transformation, he is in unity with the mysterious Heaven.'

13. Î-r Dze[2] having gone to see Hsü Yû, the latter said to him,
'What benefit have you received from Yâo?' The reply was, 'Yâo says to me, You
must yourself labour at benevolence and righteousness, and be able to tell clearly
which is right and which wrong (in conflicting statements).' Hsü Yû rejoined,
'Why then have you come to me? Since Yâo has put on you the brand of his benevolence
and righteousness, and cut off your nose with his right and wrong[3], how will
you be able to wander in the way of aimless enjoyment, of unregulated contemplation,
and the ever-changing forms (of dispute)?' Î-r dze said, 'That may be;
but I should

[1. This also is obscure; but Confucius is again made to praise
the Tâoistic system.

2. Î-r is said by Lî Î to have been 'a worthy scholar;'
but Î-r is an old name for the swallow, and there is a legend of a being
of this name appearing to king Mia, and then flying away as a swallow;--see
the Khang-hsî Thesaurus under ###. The personage is entirely fabulous.

3 Dismembered or disfigured you.]

{p. 256}

like to skirt along its hedges.' 'But,' said the other, 'it cannot be. Eyes
without pupils can see nothing of the beauty of the eyebrows, eyes, and other
features; the blind have nothing to do with the green, yellow, and variegated
colours of the sacrificial robes.' Î-r dze rejoined, 'Yet, when Wû-kwang[1]
lost his beauty, Kü-liang[1] his strength, and Hwang-Tî his wisdom, they all
(recovered them)[2] under the moulding (of your system);--how do you know that
the Maker will not obliterate the marks of my branding, and supply my dismemberment,
so that, again perfect in my form, I may follow you as my teacher?' Hsû
Yü said, 'Ah! that cannot yet be known. I will tell you the rudiments. O my
Master! O my Master! He gives to all things their blended qualities, and does
not count it any righteousness; His favours reach to all generations, and He
does not count it any benevolence; He is more ancient than the highest antiquity,
and does not count Himself old; He overspreads heaven and supports the earth;
He carves and fashions all bodily forms, and does not consider it any act of
skill;--this is He in whom I find my enjoyment.'

14. Yen Hui said, 'I am making progress.' Kung-nî replied, 'What do you mean?'
'I have ceased to think of benevolence and righteousness,' was the reply. 'Very
well; but that is not enough.'

Another day, Hui again saw Kung-nî, and said, 'I am making progress.' 'What
do you mean?'

'Names of parties, of whom we know nothing. It is implied, we must suppose,
that they had suffered as is said by their own inadvertence.

[1. We must suppose that they had done so.]

{p. 257}

'I have lost all thought of ceremonies and music.' 'Very well, but that is
not enough.,

A third day, Hui again saw (the Master), and said, 'I am making progress.'
'What do you mean?' 'I sit and forget everything[1].' Kung-nî changed countenance,
and said, 'What do you mean by saying that you sit and forget (everything)?'
Yen Hui replied, 'My connexion with the body and its parts is dissolved; my
perceptive organs are discarded. Thus leaving my material form, and bidding
farewell to my knowledge, I am become one with the Great Pervader[2] . This
I call sitting and forgetting all things.' Kung-nî said, 'One (with that Pervader),
you are free from all likings; so transformed, you are become impermanent. You
have, indeed, become superior to me! I must ask leave to follow in your steps[3].'

15. Dze-yü[4] and Dze-sang[4] were friends. (Once), when it had rained continuously
for ten days, Dze-yü said, 'I fear that Dze-sang may be in distress.' So he
wrapped up some rice, and went to give it to him to eat. When he came to Dze-sang's
door, there issued from it sounds between singing and wailing;

[1. 'I sit and forget;'--generally thus supplemented (###).
Hui proceeds to set forth the meaning he himself attached to the phrase.

2. Another denomination, I think, of the Tâo. The is also explained
as meaning, 'the great void in which there is no obstruction (###).

3. Here is another testimony, adduced by our author, of Confucius's
appreciation of Tâoism; to which the sage would, no doubt, have taken exception,

4. Two of the men in pars. 9, 10.]

{p. 258}

a lute was struck, and there came the words, 'O Father! O Mother! O Heaven!
O Men!' The voice could not sustain itself, and the line was hurriedly pronounced.
Dze-yü entered and said, 'Why are you singing, Sir, this line of poetry in such
a way?' The other replied, 'I was thinking, and thinking in vain, how it was
that I was brought to such extremity. Would my parents have wished me to be
so poor? Heaven overspreads all without any partial feeling, and so does Earth
sustain all;--would Heaven and Earth make me so poor with any unkindly feeling?
I was trying to find out who had done it, and I could not do so. But here I
am in this extremity!--it is what was appointed for me[1]!'

[1. Here is the highest issue of Tâoism;--unquestioning submission
to what is beyond our knowledge and control.]

{p. 259}

BOOK VII.

PART I. SECTION VII.

Ying Tî Wang[1], or 'The Normal Course for Rulers and Kings[1].'

1. Nieh Khüeh[2] put four questions to Wang Î[2], not one of which did he know
(how to answer). On this Nieh Khüeh leaped up, and in great delight walked away
and informed Phû-î-dze[3] of it, who said to him, 'Do you (only) now know
it? He of the line of Yü[4] was not equal to him of the line of Thâi[5]. He
of Yü still kept in himself (the idea of) benevolence by which to constrain
(the submission of) men; and he did win men, but he had not begun to proceed
by what did not belong to him as a man. He of the line of Thâi would sleep tranquilly,
and awake in contented simplicity. He would consider himself now (merely) as
a horse, and now (merely) as an ox[6]. His knowledge was real and untroubled

[1. See pp. 136-138.

2. See p. 190, note 5.

3. An ancient Tâoist, of the time of Shun. So, Hwang-fû
Mî, who adds that Shun served him as his master when he was eight years old.
I suppose the name indicates that his clothes were made of rushes.

4. Shun. See p. 245, note 3.

5. An ancient sovereign, earlier, no doubt, than Fû-hsî;
but nothing is known of him.

6. He thought nothing about his being, as a man, superior to
the lower creatures. Shun in governing employed his acquired knowledge; Thâi
had not begun to do so.]

{p. 260}

by doubts; and his virtue was very true:--he had not begun to proceed by what
belonged to him as a man.

2. Kien Wû[1] went to see the mad (recluse), Khieh-yü[2], who said to
him, 'What did Zäh-kung Shih[3] tell you?' The reply was, 'He told me that when
rulers gave forth their regulations according to their own views and enacted
righteous measures, no one would venture not to obey them, and all would be
transformed.' Khieh-yd said, 'That is but the hypocrisy of virtue. For the right
ordering of the world it would be like trying to wade through the sea and dig
through the Ho, or employing a musquito to carry a mountain on its back. And
when a sage is governing, does he govern men's outward actions? He is (himself)
correct, and so (his government) goes on;--this is the simple and certain way
by which he secures the success of his affairs. Think of the bird which flies
high, to avoid being hurt by the dart on the string of the archer, and the little
mouse which makes its hole deep under Shän-khiû[4] to avoid the danger
of being smoked or dug out;-are (rulers) less knowing than these two little
creatures?'

3. Thien Kän[5], rambling on the south of (mount) Yin[6], came to the neighbourhood
of the Liâo-water.

[1. See p. 170, note 2.

2. See p. 170, note 3.

3. A name;--'a worthy,' it is said.

4. Name of some hill, or height.

5. A name ('Root of the sky'), but probably mythical. There
is a star so called.

6 Probably the name of a mountain, though this meaning of Yin
is not given in the dictionary.]

{p. 261}

Happening there to meet with the man whose name is not known', he put a question
to him, saying, 'I beg to ask what should be done[2] in order to (carry on)
the government of the world.' The nameless man said, 'Go away; you are a rude
borderer. Why do you put to me a question for which you are unprepared[3]? I
would simply play the part of the Maker of (all) things[4]. When wearied, I
would mount on the bird of the light and empty air, proceed beyond the six cardinal
points, and wander in the region of nonentity, to dwell in the wilderness of
desert space. What method have you, moreover, for the government of the world
that you (thus) agitate my mind?' (Thien Kän), however, again asked the question,
and the nameless man said, 'Let your mind find its enjoyment in pure simplicity;
blend yourself with (the primary) ether in idle indifference; allow all things
to take their natural course; and admit no personal or selfish consideration:--do
this and the world will be governed.'

4. Yang Dze-kü, having an interview with Lao Tan, said to him, 'Here is a man,
alert and vigorous

[1. Or, 'a nameless man.' We cannot tell whether Kwang-dze had
any particular Being, so named, in view or not.

2 The objectionable point in the question is the supposition
that doing' was necessary in the case.

3. Or, 'I am unprepared! But as Thien Kän repeats the question,
it seems better to supply the second pronoun. He had thought on the subject.

4. See the same phraseology in VI, par. 11. What follows is
merely our author's way of describing the non-action of the Tâo.

5. The Yang Kû, whom Mencius attacked so fiercely. He
was, perhaps, a contemporary and disciple of Lâo-dze.]

{p. 262}

in responding to all matters[1], clearsighted and widely intelligent, and an
unwearied student of the Tâo;--can he be compared to one of the intelligent
kings?' The reply was, 'Such a man is to one of the intelligent kings but as
the bustling underling of a court who toils his body and distresses his mind
with his various contrivances[2]. And moreover, it is the beauty of the skins
of the tiger and leopard which makes men hunt them; the agility of the monkey,
or (the sagacity of) the dog that catches the yak, which make men lead them
in strings; but can one similarly endowed be compared to the intelligent kings?'

Yang dze-kü looked discomposed and said, 'I venture to ask you what the government
of the intelligent kings is.' Lâo Tan replied, 'In the governing of the intelligent
kings, their services overspread all under the sky, but they did not seem to
consider it as proceeding from themselves; their transforming influence reached
to all things, but the people did not refer it to them with hope. No one could
tell the name of their agency, but they made men and things be joyful in themselves.
Where they took their stand could not be fathomed, and they found their enjoyment
in (the realm of) nonentity.'

5. In Käng there was a mysterious wizard[3] called

[1. The ### may be taken as = ### in which case we must understand
a ### as its object; or as = ###, an echo,' indicating the quickness of the
man's response to things.

2. Compare the language of Lâo Tan, in Bk. XII, par. 8, near
the beginning.

3. ### is generally feminine, meaning 'a witch.' We must take
{footnote p. 263} it here as masculine (= ###). The general meaning of the character
is 'magical,' the antics of such performers to bring down the spirits.]

{p. 263}

Ki-hsien. He knew all about the deaths and births of men, their preservation
and ruin, their misery and happiness, and whether their lives would be long
or short, foretelling the year, the month, the decade and the day like a spirit.
When the people of Käng saw him, they all ran out of his way. Lieh-dze went
to see him, and was fascinated[1] by him. Returning, he told Hû-dze of
his interview, and said, 'I considered your doctrine, my master, to be perfect,
but I have found another which is superior to it.' Hû-dze[2] replied,
'I have communicated to you but the outward letter of my doctrine, and have
not communicated its reality and spirit; and do you think that you are in possession
of it? However many hens there be, if there be not the cock among them, how
should they lay (real) eggs[3]? When you confront the world with your doctrine,
you are sure to show in your countenance (all that is in your mind)[4], and
so enable (this) man to succeed in interpreting your physiognomy. Try and come
to me with him, that I may show myself to him.'

On the morrow, accordingly, Lieh-dze came with the man and saw Ha-dze. When
they went out, the

[1. Literally, 'intoxicated.'

2. The teacher in Tâoism of Lieh-dze, called also Hû Khiû,
with the name Lin (###). See the remarks on the whole paragraph in the Introductory
Notice of the Book.

3. 'The hens' signify the letter of the doctrine; 'the cock,'
its spirit; 'the eggs,' a real knowledge of it.

4. ### is here in the first tone, and read as ###, meaning 'to
stretch,', to set forth.']

{p. 264}

wizard said, 'Alas! your master is a dead man. He will not live;--not for ten
days more! I saw something strange about him;--I saw the ashes (of his life)
all slaked with water!' When Lieh-dze reentered, he wept till the front of his
jacket was wet with his tears, and told Hû-dze what the man had said.
Hû-dze said, 'I showed myself to him with the forms of (vegetation beneath)
the earth. There were the sprouts indeed, but without (any appearance of) growth
or regularity:--he seemed to see me with the springs of my (vital) power closed
up. Try and come to me with him again.'

Next day, accordingly, Lieh-dze brought the man again and saw Hû-dze.
When they went out, the man said, 'It is a fortunate thing for your master that
he met with me. He will get better; he has all the signs of living! I saw the
balance (of the springs of life) that had been stopped (inclining in his favour).'
Lieh-dze went in, and reported these words to his master, who said, 'I showed
myself to him after the pattern of the earth (beneath the) sky. Neither semblance
nor reality entered (into my exhibition), but the springs (of life) were issuing
from beneath my feet;--he seemed to see me with the springs of vigorous action
in full play. Try and come with him again.'

Next day Lieh-dze came with the man again, and again saw Hû-dze with
him. When they went out, the wizard said, 'Your master is never the same. I
cannot understand his physiognomy. Let him try to steady himself, and I will
again view him.' Lieh-dze went in and reported this to Hû-dze, who said,
'This time I showed myself to him after the pattern of the grand harmony (of
the two elemental

{p. 265}

forces), with the superiority inclining to neither. He seemed to see me with
the springs of (vital) power in equal balance. Where the water wheels about
from (the movements of) a dugong[1], there is an abyss; where it does so from
the arresting (of its course), there is an abyss; where it does so, and the
water keeps flowing on, there is an abyss. There are nine abysses with their
several names, and I have only exhibited three of them. Try and come with him
again.'

Next day they came, and they again saw Hû-dze. But before he had settled
himself in his position, the wizard lost himself and ran away. 'Pursue him,'
said Hû-dze, and Lieh-dze did so, but could not come up with him. He returned,
and told Hû-dze, saying, 'There is an end of him; he is lost; I could
not find him.' Hû-dze rejoined, 'I was showing him myself after the pattern
of what was before I began to come from my author. I confronted him with pure
vacancy, and an easy indifference. He did not know what I meant to represent.
Now he thought it was the idea of exhausted strength, and now that of an onward
flow, and therefore he ran away.

After this, Lieh-dze considered that he had not yet begun to learn (his master's
doctrine). He returned to his house, and for three years did not go out. He
did the cooking for his wife. He fed the pigs as if he were feeding men. He
took no part

[1. One of the dugong. It has various names in Chinese, one
being ###, 'the Man-Fish,' from a fancied resemblance of its head and face to
a human being;--the origin perhaps of the idea of the mermaid.]

{p. 266}

or interest in occurring affairs. He put away the carving and sculpture about
him, and returned to pure simplicity. Like a clod of earth he stood there in
his bodily presence. Amid all distractions he was (silent) and shut up in himself.
And in this way he continued to the end of his life.

6. Non-action (makes its exemplifier) the lord of all fame; non-action (serves
him as) the treasury of all plans; non-action (fits him for) the burden of all
offices; non-action (makes him) the lord of all wisdom[1]. The range of his
action is inexhaustible, but there is nowhere any trace of his presence. He
fulfils all that he has received from Heaven[2], but he does not see that he
was the recipient of anything. A pure vacancy (of all purpose) is what characterises
him. When the perfect man employs his mind, it is a mirror. It conducts nothing
and anticipates nothing; it responds to (what is before it), but does not retain
it. Thus he is able to deal successfully with all things, and injures none.

7. The Ruler[3] of the Southern Ocean was Shû[4], the

[1. The four members of this sentence occasion the translator
no small trouble. They are constructed on the same lines, and seem to me to
be indicative and not imperative. Lin Hsî-kung observes that all the explanations
that had been offered of them were inappropriate. My own version is substantially
in accordance with his interpretations. The chief difficulty is with the first
member, which seems anti-Tâoistic; but our author is not speaking of the purpose
of any actor, but of the result of his non-action. ### is to be taken in the
sense of ###, 'lord,' 'exercising lordship.' The ### in the third sentence indicates
a person or persons in the author's mind in what precedes.

2. = the Heavenly or self- determining nature.

3. Perhaps 'god' would be a better translation.

4. Meaning 'Heedless.']

{p. 267}

Ruler of the Northern Ocean was Hû[1], and the Ruler of the Centre was
Chaos. Shû and Hû were continually meeting in the land of Chaos,
who treated them very well. They consulted together how they might repay his
kindness, and said, 'Men all have seven orifices for the purpose of seeing,
hearing, eating, and breathing, while this (poor) Ruler alone has not one. Let
us try and make them for him.' Accordingly they dug one orifice in him every
day; and at the end of seven days Chaos died[2].

[1. Meaning 'Sudden.'

2. The little allegory is ingenious and amusing. 'It indicates,'
says Lin, 'how action (the opposite of non-inaction) injures the first condition
of things.' More especially it is in harmony with the Tâoistic opposition to
the use of knowledge in government. One critic says that an 'alas!' might well
follow the concluding 'died.' But surely it was better that Chaos should give
place to another state. 'Heedless' and 'Sudden' did not do a bad work.]

{p. 268}

BOOK VIII.

PART II. SECTION I.

Phien Mâu, or 'Webbed Toes[1].'

1. A ligament uniting the big toe with the other toes and an extra finger may
be natural[2] growths, but they are more than is good for use. Excrescences
on the person and hanging tumours are growths from the body, but they are unnatural
additions to it. There are many arts of benevolence and righteousness, and the
exercise of them is distributed among the five viscera[3]; but this is not the
correct method according to the characteristics of the Tâo. Thus it is that
the addition to the foot is but the attachment to it of so much useless flesh,
and the addition to the hand is but the planting on it of a useless finger.
(So it is that) the connecting (the virtues) with the five viscera renders,
by excess or restraint, the action of benevolence and righteousness bad, and
leads to many arts as in the employment of (great) powers of hearing or of vision.

2. Therefore an extraordinary power of vision

[1. See pp. 138, 139.

2. Come out from the nature,' but 'nature' must be taken here
as in the translation. The character is not Tâo.

3. The five viscera are the heart, the liver, the stomach, the
lungs, and the kidneys. To the liver are assigned the element 'wood,' and the
virtue of benevolence; to the lungs, the element 'metal,' and the virtue of
righteousness.]

{p. 269}

leads to the confusion of the five colours[1] and an excessive use of ornament.
(Its possessor), in the resplendence of his green and yellow, white and black,
black and green, will not stop till he has become a Lî Kû[2]. An extraordinary
power of hearing leads to a confusion of the five notes[3], and an excessive
use of the six musical accords[4]. (Its possessor), in bringing out the tones
from the instruments of metal, stone, silk, and bamboo, aided by the Hwang-kung[4]
and Tâ-lü[4] (tubes), will not stop till he has become a Shih Khwang[5]. (So),
excessive benevolence eagerly brings out virtues and restrains its (proper)
nature, that (its possessor) may acquire a famous reputation, and cause all
the organs and drums in the world to celebrate an unattainable condition; and
he will not stop till he has become a Zäng (Shän)[6] or a Shih (Zhiû)[7].
An extraordinary

[1. Black, red, azure (green, blue, or black), white, and yellow.

2. The same as the Lî Lâu of Mencius (IV, i, 1),--of the time
of Hwang-Tî. It is not easy to construe the text here, and in the analogous
sentences below. Hsüan Ying, having read on to the ### as the uninterrupted
predicate of the sharp seer, says, 'Is not this a proof of the extraordinary
gift?' What follows would be, 'But it was exemplified in Lî Kû.' The meaning
that is given in the version was the first that occurred to myself.

3. The five notes of the Chinese musical scale.

4. There are twelve of these musical notes, determined by the
twelve regulating tubes; six, represented here by Hwang-kung, the name of the
first tube, giving the sharp notes; and six, represented by Tâ-lü, giving the
flat notes.

5. See in II, par. 5.

6. The famous Zäng-dze, or Zäng Shän, one of Confucius's ablest
disciples.

7. An officer of Wei in the sixth century B. C. He belonged
to a family of historiographers, and hence the surname Shih (###). Confucius
mentions him in the most honourable terms in the {footnote p. 270} Analect XV,
vi, by the name Shih Yü. 'Righteousness' was his great attribute.]

{p. 270}

faculty in debating leads to the piling up of arguments like a builder with
his bricks, or a net-maker with his string. (Its possessor) cunningly contrives
his sentences and enjoys himself in discussing what hardness is and what whiteness
is, where views agree and where they differ, and pressing on, though weary,
with short steps, with (a multitude of) useless words to make good his opinion;
nor will he stop till he has become a Yang (Kû)[1] or Mo (Tî)[2]. But
in all these cases the parties, with their redundant and divergent methods,
do not proceed by that which is the correct path for all under the sky. That
which is the perfectly correct path is not to lose the real character of the
nature with which we are endowed. Hence the union (of parts) should not be considered
redundance, nor their divergence superfluity; what is long should not be considered
too long, nor what is short too short. A duck's legs, for instance, are short,
but if we try to lengthen them, it occasions pain; and a crane's legs are long,
but if we try to cut off a portion of them, it produces grief. Where a part
is by nature long, we are not to amputate, or where it is by nature short, we
are not to lengthen it. There is no occasion to try to remove any trouble that
it may cause.

3. The presumption is that benevolence and righteousness are not constituents
of humanity; for to how much anxiety does the exercise of them give rise! Moreover
when another toe is united to the

[1. The two heresiarchs so much denounced by Mencius. Both have
appeared in previous Books.]

{p. 271}

great toe, to divide the membrane makes you weep; and when there is an extra
finger, to gnaw it off makes you cry out. In the one case there is a member
too many, and in the other a member too few; but the anxiety and pain which
they cause is the same. The benevolent men of the present age look at the evils
of the world, as with eyes full of dust, and are filled with sorrow by them,
while those who are not benevolent, having violently altered the character of
their proper nature, greedily pursue after riches and honours. The presumption
therefore is that benevolence and righteousness are contrary to the nature of
man:-how full of trouble and contention has the world been ever since the three
dynasties[1] began!

And moreover, in employing the hook and line, the compass and square, to give
things their correct form you must cut away portions of what naturally belongs
to them; in employing strings and fastenings, glue and varnish to make things
firm, you must violently interfere with their qualities. The bendings and stoppings
in ceremonies and music, and the factitious expression in the countenance of
benevolence and righteousness, in order to comfort the minds of men:--these
all show a failure in observing the regular principles (of the human constitution).
All men are furnished with such regular principles; and according to them what
is bent is not made so by the hook, nor what is straight by the line, nor what
is round by the compass, nor what is square by the carpenter's square. Nor is
adhesion effected by

[1. Those of Hsiâ, Shang, and Kâu;--from the twenty-third century
B. C. to our author's own time.]

{p. 272}

the use of glue and varnish, nor are things bound together by means of strings
and bands. Thus it is that all in the world are produced what they are by a
certain guidance, while they do not know how they are produced so; and they
equally attain their several ends while they do not know how it is that they
do so. Anciently it was so, and it is so now; and this constitution of things
should not be made of none effect. Why then should benevolence and righteousness
be employed as connecting (links), or as glue and varnish, strings and bands,
and the enjoyment arising from the Tâo and its characteristics be attributed
to them?--it is a deception practised upon the world. Where the deception is
small, there will be a change in the direction (of the objects pursued); where
it is great, there will be a change of the nature itself. How do I know that
it is so? Since he of the line of Yü called in his benevolence and righteousness
to distort and vex the world, the world has not ceased to hurry about to execute
their commands;--has not this been by means of benevolence and righteousness
to change (men's views) of their nature?

4. I will therefore try and discuss this matter. From the commencement of the
three dynasties downwards, nowhere has there been a man who has not under (the
influence of external) things altered (the course of) his nature. Small men
for the sake of gain have sacrificed their persons; scholars for the sake of
fame have done so; great officers, for the sake of their families; and sagely
men, for the sake of the kingdom. These several classes, with different occupations,
and different reputations,

{p. 273}

have agreed in doing injury to their nature and sacrificing their persons.
Take the case of a male and female slave[1];--they have to feed the sheep together,
but they both lose their sheep. Ask the one what he was doing, and you will
find that he was holding his bamboo tablets and reading. Ask the other, and
you will find that she was amusing herself with some game[2]. They were differently
occupied, but they equally lose their sheep. (So), Po-î[3] died at the foot
of Shâu-yang[4] to maintain his fame, and the robber Kih[5] died on the top
of Tung-ling[6] in his eagerness for gain. Their deaths were occasioned by different
causes, but they equally shortened their lives and did violence to their nature;--why
must we approve of Po-î, and condemn the robber Kih? In cases of such sacrifice
all over the world, when one makes it for the sake of benevolence and righteousness,
the common people style him 'a superior man,' but when another does it for the
sake of goods and riches, they style him 'a small man.' The action of sacrificing
is the same, and yet we have 'the superior man' and 'the small man!' In the
matter of destroying his life, and doing injury to his nature, the robber Kih
simply did the same as Po-î;-why must we make the distinction of 'superior man'
and 'small man' between them?

[1. See the Khang-hsî dictionary under the character ###.

2. Playing at some game with dice.

3. See VI, par. 3.

4. A mountain in the present Shan-hsî, probably in the department
of Phû-kâu.

5. A strange character, but not historical, represented as a
brother of Liû-hsiâ Hui. See Bk. XXIX.

5. Moreover, those who devote their nature to (the pursuit) of benevolence
and righteousness, though they should attain to be like Zäng (Shän) and Shih
(Zhiû), I do not pronounce to be good; those who devote it to (the study
of) the five flavours, though they attain to be like Shû-r[1],
I do not pronounce to be good; those who devote it to the (discrimination of
the) five notes, though they attain to be like Shih Khwang, I do not pronounce
to be quick of hearing; those who devote it to the (appreciation of the) five
colours, though they attain to be like Lî Kû, I do not pronounce to be
clear of vision. When I pronounce men to be good, I am not speaking of their
benevolence and righteousness;--the goodness is simply (their possession of)
the qualities (of the Tâo). When I pronounce them to be good, I am not speaking
of what are called benevolence and righteousness; but simply of their allowing
the nature with which they are endowed to have its free course. When I pronounce
men to be quick of hearing, I do not mean that they hearken to anything else,
but that they hearken to themselves; when I pronounce them to be clear of vision,
I do not mean that they look to anything else, but that they look to themselves.
Now those who do not see themselves but see other things, who do not get possession
of themselves but get possession of other things, get possession of what belongs
to others, and not of what is their own; and they reach forth to what attracts
others, and not to that in themselves which should attract them. But

[1. Different from Yih-ya, the famous cook of duke Hwan of Khî.
This is said to have been of the time of Hwang-Tî. But there are different readings
of the name.]

{p. 275}

thus reaching forth to what attracts others and not to what should attract
them in themselves, be they like the robber Kih or like Po-î, they equally err
in the way of excess or of perversity. What I am ashamed of is erring in the
characteristics of the Tâo, and therefore, in the higher sphere, I do not dare
to insist on the practice of benevolence and righteousness, and, in the lower,
I do not dare to allow myself either in the exercise of excess or perversity.

{p. 276}

BOOK IX.

PART II. SECTION II.

Mâ Thî, or 'Horses's Hoofs[1].'

1. Horses can with their hoofs tread on the hoarfrost and snow, and with their
hair withstand the wind and cold; they feed on the grass and drink water; they
prance with their legs and leap:--this is the true nature of horses. Though
there were made for them grand towers[2] and large dormitories, they would prefer
not to use them. But when Po-lâo[3] (arose and) said, 'I know well how to manage
horses,' (men proceeded)[4] to singe and mark them, to clip their hair, to pare
their hoofs, to halter their heads, to bridle them and hobble them, and to confine
them in stables and corrals. (When subjected to this treatment), two or three
in every ten of them died. (Men proceeded further) to subject them to hunger
and thirst, to gallop them and race them,

[1. See pp. 140, 141.

2. Literally, 'righteous towers;' but ### is very variously
applied, and there are other readings. Compare the name of ling thâi, given
by the people to the tower built by king Wän; Shih, III, i, 8.

3. A mythical being, the first tamer of horses. The name is
given to a star, where he is supposed to have his seat as superintendent of
the horses of heaven. It became a designation of Sun Yang, a famous charioteer
of the later period of the Kâu dynasty, but it could not be he whom Kwang-dze
had in view.

4. Po-lâo set the example of dealing with horses as now described;
but the supplement which I have introduced seems to bring out better our author's
meaning.]

{p. 277}

and to make them go together in regular order. In front were the evils of the
bit and ornamented breast-bands, and behind were the terrors of the whip and
switch. (When so treated), more than half of them died.

The (first) potter said, 'I know well how to deal with clay;' and (men proceeded)
to mould it into circles as exact as if made by the compass, and into squares
as exact as if formed by the measuring square. The (first) carpenter said, 'I
know well how to deal with wood;' and (men proceeded) to make it bent as if
by the application of the hook, and straight as if by the application of the
plumb-line. But is it the nature of clay and wood to require the application
of the compass and square, of the hook and line? And yet age after age men have
praised Po-lâo, saying, 'He knew well how to manage horses,' and also the (first)
potter and carpenter, saying, 'They knew well how to deal with clay and wood.'
This is just the error committed by the governors of the world.

2. According to my idea, those who knew well to govern mankind would not act
so. The people had their regular and constant nature[1]:--they wove and made
themselves clothes; they tilled the ground and got food[2]. This was their common
faculty. They were all one in this, and did not form themselves into separate
classes; so were they constituted and left to their natural tendencies[3]. Therefore
in the

[1. Compare the same language in the previous Book, par. 3.

2. But the weaver's or agriculturist's art has no more title
to be called primitive than the potter's or carpenter's.

3. A difficult expression; but the translation, probably, gives
its {footnote p. 278} true significance. I Heaven' here is synonymous with 'the
Tâo;' but its use shows how readily the minds, even of Lâo and Kwang, had recourse
to the earliest term by which the Chinese fathers had expressed their recognition
of a Supreme and Controlling Power and Government.]

{p. 278}

age of perfect virtue men walked along with slow and grave step, and with their
looks steadily directed forwards. At that time, on the hills there were no foot-paths,
nor excavated passages; on the lakes there were no boats nor dams; all creatures
lived in companies; and the places of their settlement were made close to one
another. Birds and beasts multiplied to flocks and herds; the grass and trees
grew luxuriant and long. In this condition the birds and beasts might be led
about without feeling the constraint; the nest of the magpie might be climbed
to, and peeped into. Yes, in the age of perfect virtue, men lived in common
with birds and beasts, and were on terms of equality with all creatures, as
forming one family;--how could they know among themselves the distinctions of
superior men and small men? Equally without knowledge, they did not leave (the
path of) their natural virtue; equally free from desires, they were in the state
of pure simplicity. In that state of pure simplicity, the nature of the people
was what it ought to be. But when the sagely men appeared, limping and wheeling
about in (the exercise of) benevolence, pressing along and standing on tiptoe
in the doing of righteousness, then men universally began to be perplexed. (Those
sages also) went to excess in their performances of music, and in their gesticulations
in the practice of ceremonies, and then men began to be separated from one another.
If the raw materials

{p. 279}

had not been cut and hacked, who could have made a sacrificial vase from them?
If the natural jade had not been broken and injured, who could have made the
handles for the libation-cups from it? If the attributes of the Tâo had not
been disallowed, how should they have preferred benevolence and righteousness?
If the instincts of the nature had not been departed from, how should ceremonies
and music have come into use? If the five colours had not been confused, how
should the ornamental figures have been formed? If the five notes had not been
confused, how should they have supplemented them by the musical accords? The
cutting and hacking of the raw materials to form vessels was the crime of the
skilful workman; the injury done to the characteristics of the Tâo in order
to the practice of benevolence and righteousness was the error of the sagely
men.

3. Horses, when living in the open country, eat the grass, and drink water;
when pleased, they intertwine their necks and rub one another; when enraged,
they turn back to back and kick one another;--this is all that they know to
do. But if we put the yoke on their necks, with the moonlike frontlet displayed
on all their foreheads, then they know to look slily askance, to curve their
necks, to rush viciously, trying to get the bit out of their mouths, and to
filch the reins (from their driver);--this knowledge of the horse and its ability
thus to act the part of a thief is the crime of Po-lâo. In the time of (the
Tî) Ho-hsü[1], the people occupied

[1. An ancient sovereign; but nothing more definite can be said
about him. Most of the critics identify him with Shän-näng, the {footnote p.
280} Father of Husbandry, who occupies the place in chronological tables after
Fû-hsî, between him and Hwang-Tî. In the Tables of the Dynastic Histories,
published in 817, he is placed seventh in the list of fifteen reigns, which
are placed without any specification of their length between Fû-hsî and
Shän-näng. The name is written as ### and ###.]

{p. 280}

their dwellings without knowing what they were doing, and walked out without
knowing where they were going. They filled their mouths with food and were glad;
they slapped their stomachs to express their satisfaction. This was all the
ability which they possessed. But when the sagely men appeared, with their bendings
and stoppings in ceremonies and music to adjust the persons of all, and hanging
up their benevolence and righteousness to excite the endeavours of all to reach
them, in order to comfort their minds, then the people began to stump and limp
about in their love of knowledge, and strove with one another in their pursuit
of gain, so that there was no stopping them:--this was the error of those sagely
men.