>>>>> "felix" == felixundduni <felix> writes:
felix> Is there a particular reason why condition types are prefixed
felix> with "&"?
Uh, yeah, so that they are recognizable as condition types.
felix> I find this rather ugly. One just has to take a look at PLT's
felix> units/signatures to see a how such syntactical conventions can
felix> go totally haywire.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder; I rather like PLT's naming
conventions. Can you be more specific as to what you mean by "go
totally haywire"? Alternative suggestions?
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla