tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8755035051021414780.post7924411384071661629..comments2017-08-30T15:44:07.377-04:00Comments on Ink Spots: Does the U.S. Navy really need diesel submarines?Lilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18373158801523577733noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8755035051021414780.post-88175168524966675132017-08-30T15:44:07.377-04:002017-08-30T15:44:07.377-04:00AVAILABLE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS - D2, D6, JP54 &amp; ...AVAILABLE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS - D2, D6, JP54 &amp; JETA1. <br /><br />WE HAVE AVAILABLE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FROM RELIABLE REFINERY IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION WITH BEST PRICE AND QUALITY. <br />BELOW PRODUCT ARE AVAILABLE WITH BEST OFFERS - FOB CI DIP AND PAY.<br /><br />JP54: Quantity: 500,000-2,000,000 Barrels<br />D2: Quantity: 50,000-150,000 Metric Tons<br />D6 Virgin: Quantity: 400,000,000-800,000,000 Gallon <br /><br />SERIOUS BUYERS PLEASE CONTACT US FOR MORE DETAILS WITH YOUR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS SO AS TO ENABLE US PROVIDE YOU WITH OUR WORKABLE PROCEDURE. <br />Sincerely.<br /><br />Maksim Yaroslav (Mr.)<br />EMAIL: neftegazconsultant@yandex.ru<br />EMAIL: neftegazconsultant@mail.ru<br />Skype: neftegazconsultant<br />TEL: +7 9265036551 Maksim Yaroslavhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08812143709478242474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8755035051021414780.post-66499807431370549342017-08-15T20:23:23.074-04:002017-08-15T20:23:23.074-04:00We Can supply Aviation Kerosene,Jet fuel (JP 54-A...We Can supply Aviation Kerosene,Jet fuel (JP 54-A1,5), Diesel (Gas Oil) and Fuel Oil D2, D6,ETC in FOB/Rotterdam only, serious buyer should contact now base email us (neftegazagent@yandex.ru)<br /><br />PRODUCT AVAILABLE IN ROTTERDAM/ CI DIP AND PAY IN SELLER EX-SHORE TANK.<br /><br />Russia D2 50,000-150,000 Metric Tons FOB Rotterdam Port.<br /><br />JP54 5000,000 Barrels per Month FOB Rotterdam.<br /><br />JA1 Jet Fuel 10,000,000 Barrels FOB Rotterdam.<br /><br />D6 Virgin Fuel Oil 800,000,000 Gallon FOB Rotterdam.<br /><br />E-mail: neftegazagent@yandex.ru<br />E: neftegazagent@mail.ru<br />E: neftegazagent@yahoo.com<br /><br />Best Regards<br />(Mr.) Vladislav Yakov<br />Skype: neftegazagent<br /><br />Thank YouNefteGaz Agenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04555139379098398403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8755035051021414780.post-84965878715101687732011-10-18T13:48:20.493-04:002011-10-18T13:48:20.493-04:00SSK&#39;s can be very useful for special ops teams...SSK&#39;s can be very useful for special ops teams who want to be so close to the enemy that they are literally in their harbors or off their coast. The other is that they can be used to patrol their EEZ zones while the SSN&#39;s are forward deploy and can be used for intelligence and surveillance operations.<br /><br />Even the Russians have been known to use their SSK&#39;s to patrol close to their home waters protecting and use them to protect their boomers when they send the boomers to the boomer bastion.<br /><br />That&#39;s why I believe the US Navy should have a Mix of SSN, SSBN, SSGN and SSK&#39;s. Even countries like Tawian can buy SSK&#39;s from the USAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8755035051021414780.post-9714721894413680982011-06-24T17:06:47.719-04:002011-06-24T17:06:47.719-04:00Ramius, I don&#39;t disagree with the thrust of yo...Ramius, I don&#39;t disagree with the thrust of your argument, but just a few thoughts:<br /><br />1. True, most SSKs have a shorter range and are slower when submerged. But how absolute is the need for a submerged transit from HI/CA/WA to the actual areas of operation?<br /><br />2. Don&#39;t discard AIP subs too quickly. True, probably not the right boat for trans-Pacific transits. But U-212s have made submerged transits from the Baltic to the Med and according to public sources, manage to do submerged speeds of 20kts. Imagine some of those based out of Japan or Guam.<br /><br />Best regards from the world&#39;s no. 1 SSK-building nationAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8755035051021414780.post-31406756826543461012011-06-23T03:41:26.673-04:002011-06-23T03:41:26.673-04:00S O - What naval bases would you recommend? A sign...S O - What naval bases would you recommend? A significant commitment of resources - not just cash, but political capita - would be required to build new bases in the western Pacific. Where would you put them? The Pacific is big and things are far apart. Where would these &quot;very forward bases&quot; be? I think you underestimate the support required to keep a submarine operating. &quot;Small fishery harbors&quot;? Really? &quot;A rather cheap replenishment ship&quot; wouldn&#39;t get the job done - it&#39;s the maintenance and repairs that&#39;ll kill ya. <br /><br />You&#39;re suggesting that the U.S. Navy maliciously bases submarines in U.S. ports as opposed to overseas because it requires more submarines to be built to maintain the same optempo?<br /><br />I&#39;m afraid your assertion that U.S. SSNs must stay slow to stay quiet is incorrect, as is your assertion that in-theater cruise speeds are nowhere near the published figures. I&#39;m curious why you believe either of those to be true. Once more, regarding cavitation, you seem to be misinformed - shallow water is nowhere near as limiting as you seem to think.<br /><br />Even if I granted all of the above as true - which it&#39;s not - you haven&#39;t answered the fundamental point: SSKs are ineffective at the missions for which we require submarines. Would you like to address that?Ramiusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8755035051021414780.post-1744378610650634352011-06-17T04:51:12.474-04:002011-06-17T04:51:12.474-04:00That guy doesn&#39;t exactly demonstrate an agile ...That guy doesn&#39;t exactly demonstrate an agile mind. He&#39;s deeply stuck in the Rickover navy.<br /><br />&quot;American submarines spend much of their time forward-deployed, operating covertly. Instead of the two weeks required for an SSN to transit from the West Coast to the Western Pacific, a diesel submarine would take a month and a half. In a standard deployment cycle&quot;<br /><br />Such made-for-SSN routines do not need to be used for SSKs. There&#39;s no nature&#39;s law that your naval base has to be thousands of miles away. That&#39;s actually wasteful even for SSNs (but it&#39;s the way the USN operates in part because it inflates the &quot;required&quot; ship count).<br />SSKs can even be operated from very forward bases - even small fishery harbours. All you need is a rather cheap replenishment ship and voilà, you got a naval base. <br /><br />SSKs may be slow, but so are SSNs - especially if they don&#39;t want to be heard. The in-theatre cruise speed difference is nowhere the usually published figures, especially in shallow waters where the low maximum water pressure reduces the SSN&#39;s maximum no-cavitation speed to less than half of its maximum cruise speed.<br /><br />A SSK comes close to keep the pace for two weeks under such conditions.<br /><br />There&#39;s also a counter-argument to cruise speed: Quantity. You can afford about three or more AIP SSKs instead of one SSN. This means that there&#39;s usually already an AIP SSK near the position where a SSN would be sent to.<br />Quantity becomes even more relevant if we assume that it&#39;s about war, and some subs will be lost.S Ohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03359796414832859686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8755035051021414780.post-60570133714417790592011-06-16T06:48:15.658-04:002011-06-16T06:48:15.658-04:00nice post
http://allaboutpakistani.wordpress.com/nice post<br />http://allaboutpakistani.wordpress.com/zohaib nisarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07855118129164892302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8755035051021414780.post-49014421335580541542011-06-14T16:00:57.404-04:002011-06-14T16:00:57.404-04:00&quot;What Mr. Schmitt and Mr. Cleary don’t tell y...&quot;What Mr. Schmitt and Mr. Cleary don’t tell you is the dirty little secret about diesel submarines: they’re really just mines that can move a little.&quot;<br /><br />THANK YOU, Ramius! Bravo Zulu.<br /><br />-MooseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8755035051021414780.post-49371194241355209552011-06-14T14:21:10.449-04:002011-06-14T14:21:10.449-04:00Thanks for the link shoutout! And thanks for sayi...Thanks for the link shoutout! And thanks for saying this in a much clearer and on-point manner than I was managing while trying to write a now-redundant part-II of my blurt. :-)J.B. Zimmermanhttp://www.sharp-tools.netnoreply@blogger.com