Comments on: Audio: Kevin Iole discusses Dana White’s decision not to strip Sean Sherkhttp://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/
Your Destination for Insider MMA News and OpinionTue, 03 Mar 2015 19:22:40 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1By: dizzlehttp://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5533
Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:48:04 +0000http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5533Dana is going to strip him of the belt? I think it has to do with marketing. But I think it’s unfair that he gets caught doing illegal things and isn’t punished by UFC. But instead Dana backs his friend and says he believes he didn’t do anything wrong which is BS.

Agree or Disagree: 00

]]>By: Rlnhttp://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5505
Mon, 05 Nov 2007 03:30:50 +0000http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5505“We’ve seen Dana do this in the past so I’m not surprised about this bullshit. But it is bullshit.”

It’s hardly bullshit. What happens, in say two weeks, if the CSAC prolongs the decision again for an indefinite amount of time? You end up with multiple fighters waiting on the outcome, not just Sherk. He’s has taken the power from the commission and put it back in Zuffa’s hands where it belongs. It’s also quite probable that he has seen the evidence that Jacobs has amassed and believes Sherk is innocent.

Agree or Disagree: 00

]]>By: Jake Taylorhttp://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5497
Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:41:49 +0000http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5497In regards to post #6, Sherk won’t have to sit out a full year. If the CSAC decides to slap him with a year’s suspension, it’s retroactive to his last fight which was back on July 7th. So he’ll only have to wait until July 6th 2008 in order to be able to fight again.

I think it’s great that Dana’s sticking it to the CSAC. Dana runs a very professional organization and expects the CSAC to do the same. They made a big mistake. How do you just misplace something as important as a 7 page letter from Sherk’s attorney?

The CSAC is putting Sherk’s livelihood on hold, therefore I think it’s great that Dana’s stickin it to the man.

]]>By: Sam Cupitthttp://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5478
Sun, 04 Nov 2007 00:36:16 +0000http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5478I guess you could argue the point that the CSAC compromised their integrity to such a point the other day that even if they were to find Sherk guilty, people would still not beleive it.

However, if Sherk still gets a year… Penn v Stevenson should be for the actual title. You cant have the champ out for a year, after he previously was inactive for 7 months, especially if hes been wholey convicted of being on steroids.

Agree or Disagree: 00

]]>By: Mike Olsonhttp://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5475
Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:39:16 +0000http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5475Thank god! This is great news. We now get two great fights out of the deal! Serves the CSAC right for being a bunch of yahoos who don’t have their shit together! Couldn’t be happier. He didnt knowingly take them. Look at pics of this guy from back in the day! He also passed a lie detector test, need more proof?

Agree or Disagree: 00

]]>By: Adam Morganhttp://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5472
Sat, 03 Nov 2007 22:29:00 +0000http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5472We’ve seen Dana do this in the past so I’m not surprised about this bullshit. But it is bullshit. Nice posting recently, too, Sam. Some real solid shit on here. Looking forward to getting back in action when I get back from Mississippi.

Agree or Disagree: 00

]]>By: Roryhttp://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5466
Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:25:17 +0000http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5466IMO Dana is making a power play against the CSAC. But if the suspension is merely reduced, Dana won’t look good; the CSAC will just look that much worse.

Agree or Disagree: 00

]]>By: Tommyhttp://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5460
Sat, 03 Nov 2007 19:41:48 +0000http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/03/audio-kevin-iole-discusses-dana-whites-decision-not-to-strip-sean-sherk/#comment-5460Dana has f’ed up here for sure. Sherk hired a high power lawyer to muddle things up, that’s what they do. Seems like Sherk is off the hook nomatter what. Except for maybe a fine and a prolong suspension not allowing him to fight and therefore to make an income. Wonder who’s paying these laywer fees? Would be something to find out Dana was footing that dime as well.