Contents

I've replied on my talk page and so have others. The original forum, ignoring a campaign for more votes, stands in favour of the motion clear by two votes. I would suggest that as 2/3 of the voters are in favour that we pursue this idea while it's fresh. Your next port of call is discussed on my talk page. Keep going! SirScottPat(converse)VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 12:56, August 19, 2014 (UTC)

Hi! So first of all, on the topic of advertising Pee Week, it's not too late to do it, and if you have any idea, then, please go for it! It is mentioned in the latest UnSignpost, Romartus added a notice to the site banner and I messaged our active users. Any more things to be done?

Second, I am not sure you know this, so ignore this if you already do: before reviewing an article for the Pee Week, it's best to book it in advance (leave a message on the Pee Review page for that article, saying you're going to do it), so several people don't end up reviewing the same one. Good luck and enjoy the contest! Anton(talk)Uncyclopedia United 13:21, November 16, 2014 (UTC)

Hi Wikiman! Thanks for signing up. Just wanted to remind you that the competition officially starts on December 28, however if you are impatient you can start noting down ideas right now and submit actual content after the contest begins. Nice topic, by the way! Anton(talk)Uncyclopedia United 19:42, December 18, 2014 (UTC)

No problem. I didn't even have time to do the judging yet and it seems like many people are having problems with the limit. Anton(talk)Uncyclopedia United 17:57, January 16, 2015 (UTC)