Environmental Exemptions For Foxconn May Invite Legal Challenges

Republish this content

WisContext serves the residents of Wisconsin, providing information and insight into issues as they affect the state. We report on these issues, drawing upon the resources of our project partners: Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television and Cooperative Extension. We want to share what we've learned, and you are welcome to republish our articles online and/or in print subject to the following guidelines:

Only articles credited to WisContext or its partners Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television and Cooperative Extension may be republished. If an article is credited to another organization, it is not available for republishing from our website under these guidelines.

Articles may not be edited, except to fit a publication’s house style requirements or to shorten it. If an article is shortened, please add the note “This item was edited for length.” If republishing online, please try to retain links that are already included in the article.

Please credit the article to the original author(s) and WisContext. Please use this style: [Author name], WisContext (or any of the three partner organizations if the item is originally credited to them). Please also link to wiscontext.org in the credit.

When republishing any WisContext article, this credit must be included: [Article Title] was originally published on WisContext, which produced the article in a partnership between Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television and Cooperative Extension.

By republishing articles under these guidelines, you agree to immediately remove our content from your site if we contact you and request that you do so.

Photos, graphics and data visualizations may be republished with articles if they are credited to WisContext or its three partners: Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television or Cooperative Extension. They may not be published separately from articles. If photos, graphics or data visualizations are not credited to WisContext or its partners, they may only be republished per their original copyright restrictions. (WisContext often uses Creative Commons-licensed images, and follows their republishing guidelines.)

WisContext articles may not be sold. Please do not sell advertising against WisContext articles, but they may be republished online or in print with existing ads.

If you republish our articles, please send us a note with a link to where it appears. Thank you for sharing!

In its proposed incentives package to lure electronics manufacturer Foxconn, the Wisconsin legislature is not only offering unprecedented economic incentives, but also carves out significant exemptions to state-level environmental regulations for the company. Letting Foxconn build a planned LCD manufacturing complex without submitting an environmental impact statement to the state, as well as altering wetlands and streams without state environmental permits and other regulatory exemptions, might help get the operation up and running by 2020. But streamlining this process over the short run doesn't reduce the possibility of longer-term environmental and legal headaches.

If lawmakers approve this incentives package, Foxconn would still have to comply with federal environmental regulations, some of which the state is tasked with enforcing through the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. The DNR is in the midst of a long-term struggle to conduct environmental enforcement in the face of budget cuts and political pressure to provide a more laissez faire regulatory environment in the state. Perception of a toothless DNR and the possible relaxing of environmental regulations for Foxconn have made many environmental observers wary of the factory complex's impact on Wisconsin's land, air and waters.

"We've never seen this type of exemption," said Sarah Geers, staff attorney with Midwest Environmental Advocates, in an Aug. 4, 2017 interview with Wisconsin Public Television's Here & Now. The Madison-based law firm has often been at odds with Gov. Scott Walker's administration over environmental issues.

Geers acknowledged that Foxconn officials said they intend to comply with state and federal environmental laws. But up to this point, most of the company's operations have been overseas, in nations known for having lax environmental standards, including China.

"I'm not sure if they have experience complying with the environmental laws in the United States," she said. "In their plants in China, they have had extensive environmental pollution issues, regarding pollution of China's rivers as well as air pollution."

Your browser does not support iframes. But You can use the following link. Link

When it comes to Wisconsin, an LCD factory would place heavy demands on water resources, for starters. In China, Foxconn has faced heavy scrutiny for practices involving the discharge of heavy metals into lakes and rivers and its airborne emissions. Indeed, one subsidiary of Foxconn in China has been accused of interfering with environmental inspections.

Waiving the state's requirement for an environmental impact statement before breaking ground on a factory complex is particularly troubling, Geers said. These statements, filed under the Wisconsin Environmental Policy Act, generally outline a proposed project's surroundings and what environmental effects it might have, as well as alternatives and strategies for mitigating those impacts.

Geers considers the this impact statement one of the state's most important tools in environmental protection.

"[These statements] put all of the information about potential environmental impacts in one place for agency decision makers who may be siloed into narrow permitting programs themselves," she said. "[They] also make that information digestible for the public."

It's not yet clear what court actions environmental advocates could take before a Foxconn plant could be built, but Geers hinted that the state could be opening itself up to a lawsuit if the legislature passes the incentives bill is currently considering.

"Once the legislature acts to take away these environmental protections, that may have serious implications for constitutional protections under the public trust doctrine," she said, referring to a provision in the state constitution governing navigable waterways.

"The exemptions that this bill creates have really made a more complicated and burdensome process for the company to follow by making divergent federal and state programs," she said. "And there again, it's another opportunity for litigation."

Commenting Policy

WisContext welcomes civil, on-topic comments and opinions that advance the discussion from all perspectives of an issue. Comments containing outside links (URLs) will only be posted after they’ve been approved by a moderator. WisContext will delete comments that violate our guidelines. Visit our social media guidelines for more information about these policies.