I'm viewing on a mobile device. If I get to the login prompt, either by selecting Log In from the menu or by trying to add a comment to a recipe, there's no apparent way to close the prompt and return to what I was just viewing.

My boss was recently promoted from "XYZ Manager" to "Director of XYZ." The latter position didn't exist beforehand, and there's no indication that anyone will fill the former. They got everyone together and made a big deal out of it. She was even given a framed piece of paper with her new title printed on it.

First, it's not incredibly difficult to attain 501(c)(3) status. When I read through the bill, though, I see no specific mention of 501(c)(3)s. The bill seeks to prevent "discrimination" against people:
"'Person' means any individual, corporation, partnership, proprietorship, firm, enterprise, association, public or private organization of any character, or other legal entity."

While most of the listed definitions of "discrimination" do appear to be specific to non-profits and students, tucked in the middle is this one:
"Deny, withhold, reduce, exclude, terminate, reprimand, censure, or otherwise make unavailable any government grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, loan, guarantee, license, certification, scholarship, accreditation, employment, or other similar position or status from or to a person."
This would not only make it okay for the government to contract companies with discriminatory practices, it would make it illegal for the government to exclude such companies from contract opportunities.

Furthermore, this bill wouldn't only protect discrimination against same-sex couples; it would protect discrimination based on the belief that "sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage [the union of one man and one woman]." In a 2002 (old, I know, but I doubt the numbers have gotten lower) survey of over 7000 women and almost 5000 men, the NIH found that, by age 44, approximately 95% of Americans had engaged in sex outside of marriage. With this bill, the government would essentially condone the discrimination of just about anyone, as long as you say it's because of your "sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction" in regards to another's high likelihood of having had sex outside of marriage.

A younger guy (high school age maybe?) walked up to me at Target while I was shopping with my girlfriend and asked if I work out a lot. I said no and he asked if he could "catch a whiff of [my] pits." I said "no, sorry," and he walked away. I assumed someone put him up to it, but he was there alone.