Monday, 5 May 2014

Yet another road rage incident involving an Ang Moh motorist happened on the roads of Singapore! According to the Singaporean victim Tay, the arrogant motorist flashed his middle finger and hit his car just because Tay tapped his horn (once) when the motorcyclist did an illegal U-turn.

Is this the sort of thuggish behaviour we expect from our foreign talents? Regardless of one's wealth and standing, one is expected to abide by the laws of the land you are in. The motorist's total disregard for fellow motorists and his arrogance pissed off many Singaporeans. Many have since called for the authorities to take swift action against him.

Alas, no action was taken against this brazen motorist for his bad behaviour till today.

Because of the authorities's reticence in doing justice, The Unseen Singapore felt compelled to stand up for our fellow Singaporeans. Without further ado, we present to you, Mark Franklin, the Suntec City road rage motorist.

Based on the evidence given by Tay, the motorist speaks with a British accent and the incident happened at Suntec City.

After the incident, Singaporeans managed to track down the same Red Vespa FBE197R parked in the vicinity of Suntec City on at least two other occasions.

The video of the incident was then uploaded onto YouTube and a YouTube whistle blower by the name of Peter Lim exposed the motorist to be Mark Franklin, Managing Director of Piaggio Asia Pacific. Mark is obviously pretty "well-liked" to be outed like that on the internet.

With this tip, The Unseen Singapore dug deeper and found two compelling pieces of evidence to back up this claim.

First, Piaggio Asia Pacific's office is situated at Suntec City Tower Two and being the Managing Director, it would explain why Mark Franklin parks his Vespa in the Suntec area and drives a red hot Vespa (live product advertising).

Second, from Mark Franklin's Facebook, it is confirmed that he is British and this ties up with the victim's account of the motorist speaking with a British accent.

Are these facts purely coincidental or is Mark Franklin the bozo on that sexy red Vespa?

Will Mark Franklin be man enough to own up to his mistake and apologise to all Singaporeans for his thuggish arrogance?

Now that we (the People) have done the heavy lifting, will the authorities take action against this foreign talent or are they afraid of his wealth and influence?

Singaporeans welcome foreign talents to our little island but if you step on us, we will "hunt" you down and shame you :)

Thursday, 13 February 2014

Whenever Singaporeans talk about the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF), the focus on our military leader's lack of real combat experience never fail to arise. Moreover, with the mediocrity of our paper generals on display for all to see, there is little wonder why Singaporeans doubt their capabilities. Looking at Lui Tuck Yew and Desmond Kuek's dismal performance in their current vocations, The Unseen Singapore shudders at the thought of them commanding our troops in times of war.

However, do not despair Singapore. You may not be aware but walking among our midst are combat veterans from the 1965 Konfrontasi period. Singaporean men from 1SIR and 2SIR who fought valiantly against the Indonesian commandos inserted to wreck havoc on the Malaysian Peninsula. Perhaps, their combat experience would prove invaluable in any future conflicts Singapore were to face? Hence, strictly speaking, the SAF do have some combat experience, just not in recent years.

Based on historical reports, 1SIR was deployed to Pulau Sebatik in Sabah. Being an island which lies in the middle of the border of Malaysia and Indonesia, this was one of the few place during the conflict where fierce firefights and artillery fire occurred. Throughout its deployment to Pulau Sebatik, 1SIR did not suffered any casualties. Pulau Sebatik was also where Singapore's first Chief of Defence Force Winston Choo saw action as a Second Lieutenant in 1SIR serving as 11th platoon commander of ‘C’ (Charlie) Company.

Unfortunately for 2SIR which was rushed from Singapore in response to the Indonesian incursion into Kota Tinggi, 8 men were killed in the conflict. A platoon from 2 SIR was sent inside the jungles of Kota Tinggi to look for the 98 strong intruder, now in hiding after they were scattered by tropical storms on the day of their landing.

Unknown to 2SIR, the Indonesians were tailing one of the 2SIR sections. Not finding the Indonesians for a week, that section grew tired and went for a bath at one of the nearby streams. Everybody left their weapons at the riverbank with no personnel on sentry-duty. The Indonesians pounded on the unsuspecting soldiers but for one injured personnel who managed to sneak away and ran for his life into Kota Tinggi Town.

The bodies of the fallen soldiers were recovered in a terrible condition not just due to the decomposition, but from the mutilations done by the Indonesian troops. They were reported to have been found with their genitals cut off and stuffed into the mouths of the corpses. This disastrous loss of life may also be the reason why it is drilled into the heads of every Singaporean son that their rifles are their wives and must be with them at all times.

After the massacre, reinforcements were rushed up from Singapore. On that mission were young soliders like James Teo (5SIR CO 1971), Jimmy Yap (CO Officer Cadet School), Mahinder Singh (Dy Director SAFTI) and Dalgit Singh (CO 3SIR). This time, the Indonesians scattered in different directions and few Indonesians were caught alive. Dalgit Singh was credited for single-handedly killing 6 or 7 Indonesians during that mission.

With the contributions of these unsung combat veterans in mind, shouldn't the government confer them as Singapore's national heroes? Just as the Indonesians wish to name their naval frigates after their fallen saboteurs, Singapore should follow suit and name our military hardware after these brave men who took out the Indonesians infiltrators during Konfrontasi. Don't you agree Singapore?

Friday, 24 January 2014

This morning the internet was abuzz with news that Anton
Casey, the now infamous FT wealth manager has escaped Singapore with his wife
and son in tow. To us at The Unseen Singapore it was good riddance as it saved the
people of Singapore time and money that would have been spent trying evict him
out of our Singapore. Now that he is physically gone, has the problem been
solved as well?

The answer is NO! The root problem in Singapore is our
over-reliance on foreign PMETs. These
foreign PMETs form their own cliques, employ their own friends and carry on with life as though it was in
their home country. There is simply no motivation to do as the Singaporeans do. Hence the arrogant and elitist higher than thou behaviour emerges.

The Singapore finance industry is a perfect example of this
over-reliance on foreign PMETs and its cliquish orientation. People like Anton
Casey are part of an elite group of Caucasian expat wealth managers that are
here in Singapore to work and lead the high life. Just take a walk down Shenton
way during lunch hour and you see the hordes of Caucasians in suit and ties on
the streets. Is there truly a need for these experts to manage wealth in
Singapore? Are Singaporeans incapable of doing this job? Why is it that after
so many years of being a financial hub, Singaporeans are still unable to call
the wealth manager profession their own? Why is there this persistent over-reliance
on foreigners who are at most B grade talents from their own countries?

Some may debunk this fact as being isolated to the
finance industry and it is not an endemic problem which exists elsewhere. To
show that this over-reliance on foreigners is real and alive, just take a
look at Singapore's education sector, a sector that doesn't exist for profits but for the betterment and education of young Singaporeans.Take the National University of Singapore History department
for example, it has a total number of 39 academic faculty members, out of which
only 11 are Singaporeans. This is a disappointing 28% out of the entire History department.

[Singaporean academics boxed in red]

If you look further, you realise that this is not isolated
to the History faculty but others as well. Others like the NUS Political Science department presents an even grimmer proportion of Singaporeans. Out of
the 34 faculty members only 9 are Singaporeans! This gives us an even lower
Singaporean proportion of26%. Is NUS trying to say Singapore talent is less worthy than B-grade foreign talent? If our own universities don't nurture our own kind, who will?

[Singaporean academics boxed in red]

This blatant preference for foreign academics is even
more frustrating when aspiring young academics
are refused jobs at local universities and forced to pursue their academic
research overseas. But this is hardly surprising since the faculty heads
themselves are dominated by foreigners, who by nature are inclined to bring in
their entire village of B-grade talents. This lust for foreigners not only denies opportunities to
capable Singaporeans, it also dwindles our already minuscule Singaporean core
within the local education system.

Monday, 20 January 2014

Just 3 days after the Public Transport Council announced the unpopular transportation fare hike, Singapore's ever 'reliable' MRT trains broke down again. This time, on the North-South Line, from Ang Mo Kio Station all the way to Marina Bay. Exactly what needs to be done to rectify the problem? Is it a hardware or a heartware issue? The Unseen Singapore believes that it is a heartware problem that can only be solved by changing the SMRT Management. After the money grubbing Saw Paik Hwa was kicked out, SMRT's management brought in LG Desmond Kuek, a full time paper general to helm the company. How does his qualifications and experience help in bringing the company forward? If we look at Desmond Kuek's achievements during his 15 months tenure at the company, there were no visible improvement to the reliability and the service standards of Singapore's MRT system. Instead, under his SMRT leadership, Singapore suffered 2 major breakdowns affecting thousands of Singaporeans and 8 other MRT/LRT disruptions! To make matters worse, the PTC granted SMRT their application for an increase in transport fares! What has happened to Singapore's famed meritocracy? If we recall, Singapore's meritocracy rewards those who perform and in this blatant example of gross incompetence, how can the government reward SMRT with higher fares which in turn boost their profit revenue further? SMRT needs to make immediate rectification and get rid of paper general Desmond Kuek and bring in someone with the relevant rail experience to revive Singapore's ailing system. Looking at his track record, this is not the first time Desmond Kuek being caught out of his depth. In July 2010, after leaving the SAF, Desmond Kuek was appointed Permanent Secretary for the Ministry of Environment and Water Resource. However, Desmond Kuek only lasted for 3 months as Permanent Secretary and quietly left the service soon after. SMRT should take cue from the Singapore Government and get rid of this dead weight at once. The quicker he goes, the faster we get our MRT back on track! LIKE us on Facebook!

Wednesday, 8 January 2014

Ever wonder why Singapore in recent years seem to suffer from an avalanche of infrastructure problems?From the unstoppable floods at Orchard road to the incessant train breakdowns and more recently, the massive jam at the newly opened MCE (Marina Coastal Expressway), it made us wonder why despite the amount of resources and talent Singapore has, Singapore seemed to be screwing up over and over again when it comes to our physical infrastructure.

We at The Unseen Singapore found the real reason behind Singapore's infrastructural woes. Being a nation that believes in nurturing our best and brightest talent, Singapore sends these brainy and all-rounded individuals overseas to pursue their tertiary education. Unfortunately, by looking at the breakdown of what our PSC scholars study, there is a disproportionate number of individuals pursuing degrees in Economics, Politics and the Humanities. From 2009 -2012, we had 288 PSC scholars, out of whom 119 or 41.3% of them studied Economics, Politics and Humanities. We understand that Singapore's knowledge-based economy is important but is PSC's focus on such generalist courses of study really beneficial to our country? Or is this policy rearing it ugly head now?

In Singapore's unwavering pursuit of economic growth and political stability, has PSC neglected Singapore's engineering and ultimately infrastructural needs? Within the same time period, only 24 (8.3%) PSC scholars read Engineering and this is inclusive of non-structural engineering like computer science and electrical engineering. With such a small number of engineering-trained PSC scholars in Singapore's civil service, isn't Singapore's physical infrastructure under severe mismanagement? How can someone trained in Economics, Politics and the Humanities fully grasp the subtleties of engineering work and do a good job at managing Singapore's physical infrastructure? Judging by the numerous flooding, breakdowns and traffic jams, it is clear that Singapore is in dire need of Engineering scholars and PSC should do the right thing and put a stop to this rotten policy. If you like what you read, please LIKEus on Facebook!

Monday, 6 January 2014

After our latest article where The Unseen Singapore likened Mr
Mohamed Jufrie Bin Mahmood to be Singapore's version of Edward
Snowden, the article was extremely well received by our online
readers and readership has shot through the roof!
It was also a pleasant surprise when our friends at The Real
Singapore informed us that Mohamed Jufrie had come out to give
further clarity on what transpired. Unfortunately, Mr Jufrie may have
misunderstood our intentions. Perhaps he thought we were painting him
as an Opposition mole as he took a harsh tone against our writing and
argued for his innocence. Jangan sensitive uncle!
On the contrary, Mr Jufrie's past actions showcased his valiant
struggle for democracy and firm defiance against the lack of free
speech in Singapore, both qualities befitting of whistleblowers like
Edward Snowden and himself.
Also, since Mr Jufrie himself said that his previous employment with ISD was well-known within the opposition circles, he should have
confidence that his friends would not see him with a different
light. Evermore so when he is a seasoned opposition warhorse who
after being removed from ISD/CID joined JBJ's Workers' Party and ran
for three elections (1984, 1988, 1991) before eventually switching
his allegiance to SDP in 1997.

Having clarified our position, it was heartening when Mr Jufrie
mentioned that "many friends and party comrades were surprised
to learn ... that he had at one time worked in ISD". It truly
validated the existence of The Unseen Singapore where we bring
out such little known facts into the public spotlight. Despite this
little success, we at The Unseen Singapore will continue to unearth
such little gems and we look forward to the continuous support from
all Singaporeans.
Moving on to Mr Jufrie's revelations, we were genuinely appalled
at the treatment he endured and we urge him to sue the Singapore
government for this outrage. Mr Jufrie must have his reasons for
taking a long 34 years before coming out into the open on these
outrageous series of events but justice delayed is justice denied.
If Jufrie argued that he was wrongly jailed for speaking up
against the government, coerced to lie under oath in court and was
physically abused during his detention, then Jufrie should hire
prominent human rights lawyer like M Ravi or Choo Zheng Xi to
represent him and fight against his wrongful arrest and punishment.
Given M Ravi and Choo Zheng Xi's track record (SMRT bus drivers &
Little India rioters) in taking up cases involving police brutality,
they are best positioned to help Mohamed Jufrie in this legal
endeavour.
There are however a few issues which may work against Mr Mohamed
Jufrie if he were to sue the Singapore Government. Once these issues
are comprehensively explained, Mr Mohamed Jufrie will have a rock
solid case at undoing the injustice done to him 34 years ago.In his FB post, Mr Jufrie admitted to phishing for information
(detainee whereabouts) from his ISD colleagues after being approached
by the relatives of ISD detainees. Depending on how the learned judge
interprets or twists this, it could be easily perceived as spying and
that could be problematic.
Next, Mr Mohamed Jufrie also mentioned that ISD found translated
documents which he was not supposed to have under lock and key at his
CID office. We are not certain of the exact terms and conditions of
the Official Secrets Act, but having unauthorised documents under
one's possession could be an another technicality used by the
prosecutor to do him in. Perhaps Mr Jufrie should reveal the nature
and ownership (CID or ISD) of these documents and debunk these
baseless accusations of unauthorised document ownership against him.The Unseen Singapore wishes Mr
Jufrie good health and a better showing in the coming general
elections. Hopefully, Mr Jufrie will finally get the justice that he so deserves!
Please LIKE us on Facebook!

Pages

About Us

The Unseen Singapore reveals the rarely spoken, seldom seen or little known facts about Singapore.
We look for facts overlooked by the common man and bring it out into the light of day. We hope you enjoy our work.
If you have something compelling to share, feel free to contact us at theunseensingapore(at)gmail.com