Limiting Islamic Theocracy in America

We have spoken often and at length about the
menace presented by the Islamic theocracy to our various religions, our
culture and our nation. The menace is twofold: first, Islam is a
theocracy, pure and simple; that means that Islam is a radical
combination of Church and State. Second, Islam is, at its ultimate end
goal, absolutely intolerant of any other religion and any other form of
government or civil law. Disciples are required by faith to embrace,
promote and live within Sharia, the Islamic law, which encompasses both
civil and ecclesial law.

Henceforth, I will refer to Islam as a theocracy rather than a religion.

The relentless goal of the Islamic
theocracy is to expand Ummah, meaning the entire Moslem world community
in submission to Allah, at our expense. Another term for Ummah is Dar
Al Islam, or the House of Peace. Where we non-Moslems live is in Dar Al
Harb, or, the House of War. The whole goal of Islam is to expand Dar
Al Islam at the expense of Dar Al Harb. This vitally important aspect
of Islam is tightly bound up in the guiding ethos of the religion and culture of Islam; it is interwoven into the very purpose for being of the devout Moslem.

For this reason I have set my sights on the very
ideology of Islam, the core belief, which is the thing that must
ultimately be defeated in the hearts and minds of men. The current
Ummah contains many millions of disciples of Islam who know little or
nothing about Sharia, other than what they hear in the Mosques, which
may or may not go into detail. The fact that there are huge numbers of
faithful Moslems who are peaceful and decent people operates in spite of the Islamic theocracy, and certainly not because of it. The whole goal of the Islamic theocracy is to expand itself by force.

Here, allow me
to present a brief summary of what the Islamic theocracy demands of
adherents, toward achieving a one-world Ummah under one grand Caliph:

An offer must be made to the non-Moslem person or nation to submit to Islam.

The non-Moslem may convert and live in accordance with Islamic religion, culture and law.

The non-Moslem may not convert, but submit to Islamic law and Islamic authority, pay a special tax, and continue to live where he resides.

If the non-Moslem person or nation does not convert and does not submit, war is to be made against them.

If a Moslem commits murder or violence against a non-Moslem in
Dar Al Harb without first making the offer, he commits a sin; however,
there is to be no temporal punishment for this violation of Sharia,
because, in Dar Al Harb, anything goes against the non-believers. Allah is merciful only in Dar Al Islam.

From Saladin to Khomeini to Bin Ladin,
nobody ever “hijacked” Islam or otherwise miss-represented what Islam
stands for. They all acted in strict accordance with the law as defined
in the Islamic theocracy. It was thoroughly main-stream and perfectly
orthodox Islamic law that directed them all to do the things that they
did.

The problem in America
is that we Constitutionally insist upon freedom of religion, and Islam
is touted to be a true religion rather than a political ideology aimed
at world domination. Even outlawing Sharia, as we have recommended,
presents the same difficulty, because the Islamic law is itself all
bound up in the “religion.”

And so we are presented with the unique situation in
which foreigners have the unmitigated gall to plot our death and
destruction because of our non-adherence to their foreign laws. Enemies
actually dare to come here and murder innocent people without warning
because of some law, edict or fatwa issued by somebody foreign to us and
not subject to our law. Islamic “immigrants” and local converts feel
perfectly free to work within our own borders to achieve our ultimate
subjugation or destruction.

Those few of us not mesmerized by the
“Islam is a religion of peace” mantra are still hindered by our own law
from actually doing anything serious about it.

SANE enters the picture again, with what looks to be a viable solution. What they propose is attacking not the religion, and not Sharia, but the words and the intent and the specific preaching
of the Islamic theocracy’s ultimate world domination law. And the tool
they use is The Smith Act of 1940, as amended; the existing US law as
codified in Title 18 (the federal criminal code), Section 2385, as
follows:

§ 2385: Advocating overthrow of Government

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the
duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or
destroying the government of the United States or the government of any
State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of
any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the
assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such
government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells,
distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter
advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or
propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United
States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group,
or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow
or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes
or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or
assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty
years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United
States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next
following his conviction.

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this
section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by
the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five
years next following his conviction.

As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with
respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the
recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping
or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such
society, group, or assembly of persons.

I submit that the Islamic theocracy cannot properly
operate anywhere in America without violating this American law. Full
enforcement of this act, if that were possible, might result in the
elimination of the Islamic theocracy in America. The prohibitions in
the act represent the contents of editorials and sermons heard in most
if not all Moslem communities and Mosques in America. You can see a
great deal more about this in SANEs new project, Mapping Shari’a in America.

Again, SANE seems to show the way. Our
civil and ecclesial authorities must be separate, by law; our
Constitution demands it. The Islamic theocracy seeks to destroy that,
and replace it. I have some problems with SANE. However, when they
identify a legal weapon to oppose the advance of the Islamic theocracy I
stand with them.

My problems with SANE’s direction are
related to their opposition to representative government, and their
inability or unwillingness to identify the form of unrepresentative
government they prefer. There is also a less defined uneasiness
relating to their seeming willingness to restrict the right to vote from
everyone other than white males, although I have seen nothing
explicitly racist or sexist in their output. Restricting the vote makes
no difference anyway, since SANE opposes the vote, period. Their NuVo
Initiative and their many anti-Democracy editorials prove that they just
flat out oppose all representative government, and that’s definitely an
equal opportunity position.

The usual position of the party who
opposes representative government is that the party sees the overall
population as too stupid to govern themselves, and in need of an elite
class of educated bureaucrats or monarchs or an un-elected Senate or
something to take care of them and all their needs. That’s a
position that will never find comfort among the lowly hoi polloi of
America, stupid though we all may be. Of course, SANE has never stated
precisely what they would like to replace our vote with.

But when it comes to identifying and
knowing the enemy, at least the Islamic theocracy as an enemy, there is
no one else out there doing as good a job as SANE. Their effort needs
to be as widely disseminated as possible. And the true nature of the
international threat posed by the Islamic theocracy needs to be
publicized more than any topic today.

Pray for America.

=====

Note added Feb 7, 2013:

It strikes me on re-reading this that § 2385: Advocating overthrow of Government quoted above is a near perfect law prohibiting Marxism, in all its variations, and that Marxism is most likely what it was designed to make illegal here. Yet today the ideologies and sub-theories of Marxism permeate American society to such a degree that it is not even recognized as Marxism any more. The Democrat Party, for instance, is dominated by twisted notions of Marxist "equality" rather than equality before the law, and the underhanded "Social Justice" themes aimed at redistribution of wealth, the elimination of private property and the collectivization of the citizenry. And Marxism, at its core, seeks the eventual violent overthrow of whatever system currently exists, just like Islam. Obviously, this law, § 2385, is not being enforced today.

=====

Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click a footnote link to see the gory details.)

The Supreme Court repeatedly upheld that mere advocacy of the
necessity or desirability of overthrowing the US government, even by
violent means, is constitutionally protected speech, absent an imminent
threat of action to carry that out.

And an attempt to use Constitutional means to do so --
such as the ballot box and the amendment process, is always
Constitutionally protected.

I disagree, and (at least sometimes) so does the Court. As documented by SANE right here, this law was tested by the Supreme Court twice, once in support, and once avoiding the first amendment issue altogether.

Our history shows that determination of whether an
issue violates or does not violate our Constitution depends almost
entirely upon the makeup of the Court at that moment in time. Whether
the sitting Justices represent, in their majority, the guiding ethos of,
say, atheism or secularism, or the Islamic Theocracy, or, wonder of
wonders, the most common guiding ethos of the American People is
entirely dependent upon the nominations of our Presidents and the advice
and consent of our Congresses.

The Democratic Party has consistently shown that it is
and will always be steadfastly opposed to the confirmation of any
Justice who’s guiding ethos, personal sense of purpose for being, and framework for determining right and wrong coincides with the overwhelming majority of us,
the American People. It is the nature of those who consider themselves
to be “the elite” to feel that they know better than us and need to
shepherd us where we would not otherwise go, in our own best interest.
So, the ultimate outcome of Constitutional issues like this one depends
equally as much on such seemingly unrelated issues as whose running for Congress in the next election as it does on the issue itself.

This is an issue that needs to be hammered from every
available angle, including the long process of Constitutional Amendment.
Every tool in the box needs to be relentlessly and repeatedly applied.
If our theoretically representative government does not take care of
this, eventually, the people will be left no recourse other than to take
care of it themselves. The likely result of that eventuality might
involve a chaotic bloodbath, in which innocents on both sides might die.
Something effective must be done.

There are Americans who will never convert to Islam,
who will never submit to Sharia or pay any poll tax, who will go
wherever they damn well please in America whenever they want to, and who
will defend their ability to do so. And, against this simple fact, we
know that the Islamic theocracy will never stop trying to grow itself.

Sharia's secret weapon is vigilantism. Without the grassroots support
of vigilantes, Sharia cannot be enforced. When Muslims in the US begin
to do this, they will discredit themselves and Islam to the point there
will be no possible repair. An example is Dr. Nidal Hasan. When 10 such
incidents occur, Americans will organize and Islam will be exposed as a
belligerent political system that makes war on 'the other'.

Date: Wed Dec 30 05:12:37 2009
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Libertad:

Counting from when? Ten such incidents have already occurred.

I do not believe Dr. Hasan was any sort of vigilante or
anything particularly unusual. He was simply a devout Moslem. As
Moslems get more devout, as they get more deeply into their religion,
they become more dangerous to the other. That’s just the way it is.

Some of them seek out or are sought out by terrorist groups; some do not and are not. The end is the same. They are Moslems.

Vic, You have completely understood the supremacist and totalitarian nature of Islam. It is theocratic fascism.

Most Westerners haven't seen this yet. When they do, we will be
at the stage where we can protect ourselves against this seditious
ideology that is inherently violent and misogynistic.

You are absolutely right: when Moslems increase their faith, they
become more intolerant and violent. We need to begin ideological
warfare against this death cult. The chivalric orders are the best
organized to do so.

Not sure what is meant by Chivalric Orders; if what is meant is the ancient orders that fought the Crusades, they are extinct. Any Chivalric orders that exist in various nations are, to my knowledge, honorary, meaning, they exist for the purposes of the state or sovereign for bestowing honors and titles on citizens. If what is meant is orders of Masons, Masonry is against my religion.

Regards,

Vic

Date: Thu Sep 11 2014From: Vic BiorsethComment:

Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic
Center to
Catholic American Thinker.

Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option
June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .

Regards,

Vic

Language and Tone Statement

Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to just stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our high Roman Catholic and Constitutional American standards of Truth, logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, obscene, blindly & doggedly anti-Catholic, anti-American, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, be prepared to back it up, keep it clean, keep it civil, and it will be published. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the Hard Left is what it always was, the New Leftist Liberals are what they are, and the Internet is what it is.

"Clickbait" advertising links are not acceptable for posting here.

If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information. Elitist Culturally Marxist Pure Authoritarians cannot and will not tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their rigid authoritarian, anti-equality, anti-life, anti-liberty, anti-property, hedonistic, anti-Constitution, pro-Marxist, pro-Islam, anti-Catholic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, anti-male, sexist, pro-homosexual, anti-heterosexual, anti-white, racist, anti-Western, anti-American, Globalist, anti-Nation, blatantly immoral, totally intolerant and bigoted point of view.

This Form cannot be submitted until the missing fields (labelled below in red) have been filled in

ADD COMMENT

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Silence in the face of evil is speaking. "We've had enough of exhortations to be silent!
Cry out with a hundred thousand tongues. I see that the world is rotten
because of silence." Saint Catherine of Siena

“An
error which is not resisted is approved; a truth which is not defended is
suppressed…. He who does not oppose an evident crime is open to the suspicion of
secret complicity.” – Pope Felix III

“Do not forget your purpose and destiny as God's creatures.
What you are in God's sight is what you are and nothing more”—Justice Clarence Thomas

"Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, then, is the sin committed by the person who claims to have a 'right' to persist in evil-in any sin at all-and who thus rejects redemption." Pope Saint John Paul the GreatDOMINUM ET VIVIFICANTEM

"Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it, and, indeed, to neglect to confound evil men-when we can do it-is no less a sin than to encourage them." Pope St. Felix III

If a purposeful violator of the Constitution who is a sworn officer of the governemt is not a domestic enemy of America and a traitor, then
there is no such thing, and the Constitution itself is without meaning,
and America has lost its grounding and its very purpose for being. Anti-American-Court

Live Interviews

"All the evils of the world are due to lukewarm Catholics." Pope Pius V

"All the strength of Satan's reign is due to the easygoing weakness of Catholics." Pope St. Pius X

Click the image above topublish your essay or article here,to be included among those below.

Submitted Articles andReprinted Articles

(Note: copyrights on these articles wherever present will supersede the WebSite copyright at the bottom footer of every WebPage)

Still Time To Get It Right. “Once you understand the role of energy in everything, you can begin to appreciate why there's simply nothing more important to get right. Energy is at the root of everything. If you have sufficient energy, anything is possible. But without it, everything grinds to a halt.” Chris Martenson

The Heresy of Chrislam. Those claiming that the “Allah” of Islam’s Qu’ran and Yahweh or God of both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible are one and the same are missing one glaring point: GOD NEVER CONTRADICTS HIMSELF.

Never be lukewarm.Life itself demands passion.He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input. Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.

NewsletterCatholic American ThinkerFree E-zine Subscription

Email

You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you theCatholic American ThinkerNewsletterand absolutely nothing else.

The Purpose of this grouping of links is to organize
articles exposing the fraud of Islam as a religion and Mohammed as a
prophet.

The Islam PagesWith war declared on the whole non-Islamic world in the year 622 A.D., no one should have been surprised at Osama Bin Laden's declaration of war in 1966. Mohammed himself declared war on us long before we existed as a nation. To find the true source of the "radicalization" of peaceful Moslems into Jihadism, all you have to do is read the Koran. It's all right there, and there is nothing radical about it.

"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII

"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi

Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance
may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston
Churchill

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who
deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand

Atheist Genesis:

In the beginning there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing.
And then nothing accidentally exploded and created everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally encountered other bits of everything and formed some new kinds of everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into self-replicating bits of everything.
And then some self-replicating bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into dinosaurs.
See?

“ … for I have sworn upon
the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind
of man.” wrote Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush in
the year of our Lord 1800. The context
involved resistance to any form of Christianity or Deism legally imposing
itself throughout the USA. We must wonder what he might say
about our current government's forced imposition of strict secularism – i.e.,
anti-theism – throughout the USA. I submit that legally enforced secularism of society, like theocracy, like Marxism,
and like Islam, is, precisely, a form of tyranny over the mind of man.Nothing good can come from the religious cleansing of Judaeo-Christian society. Government imposed secularism is just another form of theocracy.