Friday, May 10, 2019

"Is Leaked Document Trump’s “Deal of the Century”?" (Cook). Leaked by Sheldon! Cook's point is good - why risk some huge backlash and the future of the entire stealing and murdering project in some Jared-ego-flattering mega-plan when the MIGAed Trump is giving the Khazars everything they could possibly dream of, bit by bit, leading to a stealthy cumulative win for all Khazars? Also, of course, we have the macher issue, with Sheldon having every interest in letting his plans unfold, instead of losing all the glory to the criminal Kushners in their (((media))) 'deal of the century' stunt.

Greenwald's sad response to the outing of The Intercept as a proven honeypot is Peak Whataboutism, what about the NYT?:

"Hale appears to be one of the only conscientious objectors during Obama administration who was willing to take the risk to inform the public what the government was doing as it expanded drone warfare in total secrecy."

"Earlier this week, Manning's lawyers filed court papers arguing that she should not be jailed for civil contempt because she has proven that she will stick to her principles and will not testify, no matter how long she is jailed.

Federal law only allows a recalcitrant witness to be jailed on civil contempt if there is a chance that the incarceration will coerce the witness into testifying. If a judge were to determine that incarcerating Manning were punitive rather than coercive, Manning would not be jailed."

At this point she is being punished for the crime of failing to respect the authority of the Swamp.

"Drone War Victims Deserve US Accountability, German Court Rules" (Gregston).

Life under a Rothschildocracy, the world's most evil form of government: "Gilet Jaune SITREP for Labor Day and Acte 25" (Le Saker Francophone):

"In Paris, as soon as 1 p.m., even before the procession starts, the
police officers started using tear gas to raise the tension. The police
violence reached a new high.
“The demonstration had not yet begun that the first traps were set up, the first sequences of gassings. There are still dozens and dozens of astonished testimonies of this delirious outburst of blows.
Those who demonstrated for the first time with this movement are
amazed. Those who are used to union processions have never seen this”.
The police spend its time breaking the long procession, cornering
small groups to gas and beat them. One of this sequence happened in
front of hospital La Salpétrière’s entrance gate.
On May 1, the government demonstrated its ability as a manipulator.
An intox on the attack on the Salpétrière hospital. Castaner, and the
plutocratic media following him, publicly stated that “the hospital of
La Pitié-salpêtrière was under attack by the “Gilets Jaunes” and saved
by the intervention of the police”. In reality, CRSs encircled demonstrators, cornered them in the entrance of the hospital so that, under the effect of tear gas, they were just looking for shelter inside the hospital. Nursesconfirm that not much has happened. Absolutely no attack. Even the newspaper Libération, then other mainstream media following, were forced to refute Castaner’s comments. Some people have however been arrested for “organized gang attacks”. Castaner is beginning to be seriouslyquestioned, even in the mainstream press. The case turns into a public scandal. Macron did not react."

"The Real Muellergate Scandal" (Murray). "Glaring Omissions and Misrepresentations in Mueller's Report by Larry C Johnson". Mueller is a pretty standard Swamp-creature, so nothing really surprising. There is an overarching standard Washington Official Story, and he sticks to it.

"Christopher Steele Made Damning Pre-FISA Confession; FBI Retroactively Classified" (Durden). The lies in the affidavits for the FISA warrants are the obvious place to take down a few Clintonista bureaucrats.

"Deranged Zionist John Bolton Reportedly Participates in Unusual Meeting With the CIA on Iran" (Rogers). "Trump, hostage to Bolton and Pompeo, Pleads with Iran to call and Rescue Him" (Cole). Trump's attempts to distance himself from shekelemployee Bolton is less than convincing.

"Mike Pence Claims Venezuela is Providing a Base for Iranian Terrorists" (Rogers). One of the more obvious ways the (((conspiracy))) ties together.

"Trump and his team of incompetents are reinforcing Maduro’s support within Venezuela and around the Western Hemisphere. Trump announced that Philip Goldberg, formerly the US ambassador to Bolivia, will take up the same post in Bogota, Colombia. In 2008, Goldberg was expelled from Bolivia for trying to overthrow the progressive government of President Evo Morales. Goldberg also previously served in Bogota as the coordinator of Plan Colombia, a discredited State Department program that was, in reality, a US weapons-transfer and intelligence-sharing operation for Colombian paramilitary units to commit human rights abuses against Colombia’s indigenous population, farm workers, and Afro-Caribbean people along the northern coast.

Goldberg’s modus operandi in Latin America is well known. The Bolivian government said Goldberg conspired with the opposition to foment unrest in Bolivia’s natural gas-rich provinces. Goldberg has also allowed the US embassy in La Paz and the US Peace Corps and Fulbright scholars in the country to be used for espionage purposes. Goldberg was also adept at coordinating terrorist attacks on key infrastructure components. On September 11, 2008 – note the date – a gas pipeline from Bolivia to Sao Paulo, Brazil was blown up by US-supported forces. Goldberg also coordinated anti-Morales actions of the right-wing governors of Santa Cruz, Pando, Beni, and Tarija. Opposition groups funded by the United States took over government buildings in the four states. Expect Goldberg, in coordination with Duque’s government, and President Jair Bolsonaro’s neo-fascist government in Brazil to carry out similar actions targeting Venezuela."

"Thinking fast and slow in reporting Israel-Gaza fighting" (Cobban). I think this gives the lying 'journalists' way too much credit. They are instructed to outright lie. If they don't, they will just be fired by the (((owners))), (((editors))) and (((publishers))) in the (((media))). Of course, (((they))) never have to fire anybody as the 'journalists' consistently lie.

"Expose: The Labour Party Treats Palestinian Supporters as Mental Cases" and "Why Not Make Parliament Into a Holocaust Memorial?" (Atzmon).

"Increase in range of Palestinian rockets forced Israel to offer Gaza truce: Hamas". Iron Dome was another big bust, (so you moron goyim who have already paid for it better hurry up and give us money for it): "Hamas says newly-developed tactic behind ‘Iron Dome’ failure" (it seems that if you fire two rockets at once, one directed at an empty area and one directed at your real target, the Iron Dome will let both through). "Will the U.S. And Israel Wage A "Summer War"?" (Moon). Imagine the glorious thought of a two-front rocket attack on Khazaria, from both Hezbollah and Hamas, with only the Iron Dome for protection!

"The Shale Boom Is About To Go Bust" (Cunningham). It is an excellent example of the crapification of all politics that shale oil extraction wasn't immediately banned everywhere. Despite Trump's destructive and dangerous efforts to keep the price of oil up with the sanction wars, there is still going to be a crash of the shale oil extractors, leaving behind their bankers who will need to be bailed out, a consequent recession that gaudy Wall Street fake numbers won't be able to hide, and permanent pollution left behind.

"Running for president is a cash bonanza" (Madsen). The crooks supposedly regulated by the FEC openly mock it, knowing that there will be no consequences: "Fox News star Jeanine Pirro's old Senate campaign told to file reports" (Lungariello).

"Corporate Media Target Gabbard for Her Anti-Interventionism—a Word They Can Barely Pronounce" (Walsh):

"Colbert’s exceptionalism argument, in particular, is reminiscent of
the centuries-old vision of the US as a “shining city upon a hill.” It’s
also a frame historically employed by media to rationalize the
country’s foreign policy. As communications scholar Andrew Rojecki wrote
in his 2008 research article (Political Communication, 2/4/08)
on elite commentary of George W. Bush’s military interventions in
Afghanistan and Iraq, “Over the course of the two crises, American
exceptionalist themes made up a constant background presence in elite
commentary and opinion.”
In other words, the assurance that Colbert has that the US has been
“a force for good in the world” has paved the way for some of the
greatest disasters of the modern world, including the 17-year-old war in
Afghanistan (or almost 40 years, if you date from the US deliberately provoking the 1979 Soviet intervention) and the half-million-plus killed in the Iraq War. Other difficult cases for proponents of intervention include Libya, where removing an authoritarian ruler devastated the nation and brought back slave markets,
and Syria, where hawks evade responsibility for the hundreds of
thousands killed in a US-backed effort to overthrow the government by
pretending that the US has failed to intervene.
Currently, in Venezuela, where Navarro is “very supportive of what
the United States is doing,” Washington has imposed sanctions that are
blamed for killing 40,000 in the last two years (CEPR, 4/25/19). Meanwhile, the US offers as a publicity stunt a convoy with “humanitarian aid” valued at less than 1 percent of the assets it has blocked Venezuela from spending."

While almost the entire American 'left' or 'progressive' (((media))) is nothing short of appalling - I'm certain it is because of ((('donor'))) problems - FAIR is consistently excellent.

"Calvin
himself had learned Hebrew from rabbis and heaped praise on the Jewish
people. He wrote in his commentary on Psalm 119: “Where did Our Lord
Jesus Christ and his apostles draw their doctrine, if not Moses? And
when we peel off all the layers, we find that the Gospel is simply an
exhibition of what Moses had already said.” The Covenant of God with the
Jewish people is irrevocable because “no promise of God can be undone.”
That Covenant, “in its substance and truth, is so similar to ours, that
we can call them one. The only difference is the order in which they
were given.”[7]

Within
one century, Calvinism, or Puritanism, became a dominant cultural and
political force in England. Jewish historian Cecil Roth explains:

“The religious developments of the seventeenth century brought to its
climax an unmistakable philo-semitic tendency in certain English
circles. Puritanism represented above all a return to the Bible, and
this automatically fostered a more favourable frame of mind towards the
people of the Old Testament.”[8]

Some
British Puritans went so far as to consider the Leviticus as still in
force; they circumcised their children and scrupulously respected the
Sabbath. Under Charles I (1625–1649), wrote Isaac d’Israeli (father of
Benjamin Disraeli), “it seemed that religion chiefly consisted of
Sabbatarian rigours; and that a British senate had been transformed into
a company of Hebrew Rabbis.”[9]
Wealthy Jews started to marry their daughters into the British
aristocracy, to the extent that, according to Hilaire Belloc’s estimate,
“with the opening of the twentieth century those of the great
territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood were the
exception.”[10]

The
influence of Puritanism on many aspects of British society naturally
extended to the United States. The national mythology of the “Pilgrim
Fathers” fleeing Egypt (Anglican England) and settling into the Promised
Land as the new chosen people, sets the tone. However, the Judaization
of American Christianity has not been a spontaneous process from within,
but rather one controlled by skillful manipulations from outside. For
the 19th century, a good example is the Scofield Reference
Bible, published in 1909 by Oxford University Press, under the
sponsorship of Samuel Untermeyer, a Wall Street lawyer, Federal Reserve
co-founder, and devoted Zionist, who would become the herald of the
“holy war” against Germany in 1933. The Scofield Bible is loaded with
highly tendentious footnotes. For example, Yahweh’s promise to Abraham
in Genesis 12:1-3 gets a two-thirds-page footnote explaining that “God
made an unconditional promise of blessings through Abram’s seed to the
nation of Israel to inherit a specific territory forever” (although
Jacob, who first received the name Israel, was not yet born”. The same
note explains that “Both O.T. and N.T. are full of post-Sinaitic
promises concerning Israel and the land which is to be Israel’s
everlasting possession,” accompanied by “a curse laid upon those who
persecute the Jews,” or “commit the sin of anti-Semitism.”[11]

As a
result of this kind of gross propaganda, most American Evangelicals
regard the creation of Israel in 1948 and its military victory in 1967
as miracles fulfilling biblical prophecies and heralding the second
coming of Christ. Jerry Falwell declared, “Right at the very top of our
priorities must be an unswerving commitment and devotion to the state of
Israel,” while Pat Robertson said “The future of this Nation [America]
may be at stake, because God will bless those that bless Israel.” As for
John Hagee, chairman of Christians United for Israel, he once declared:
“The United States must join Israel in a pre-emptive military strike
against Iran to fulfill God’s plan for both Israel and the West.”[12]

Gullible
Christians not only see God’s hand whenever Israel advances in its
self-prophesized destiny of world domination, but are ready to see
Israeli leaders themselves as prophets when they announce their own
false-flag crimes: Michael Evans, author of American Prophecies,
believes that Isser Harel, founder of Israeli secret services, had a
prophetic inspiration when, in 1980, he predicted that Islamic
terrorists would hit the Twin Towers.[13] Benjamin Netanyahu also boasted on CNN in 2006 to have prophesized 9/11 in 1995. To the less gullible, this tells a lot about the Jewish gift of prophecy."

and (you can see why the Jewish controlled opposition to Zionism hates Atzmon so much):

"Through
Christianity, Roman Judeophobia became Judaized. The Gospel narrative
makes the Jews the plotters against the Son of God, but this Son of God
is a Jew, and soon the “Mother of God”—as Isis, Ishtar or Artemis were
called—would be turned into a Jewess too. Most importantly, Judeophobic
Christians will adopt the Tanakh and the bizarre Jewish paradigm of the
“jealous god” with his “chosen people”. From that point of view, it is
as if Christ nailed on the Cross had been used as a bait to pull
anti-Jewish Gentiles, by the line of the Old Testament, into worshipping
Jewishness.

This process fits the concept of Jewish controlled opposition conceptualized by Gilad Atzmon in his book Being in Time and in a recent video.
Whenever Jewish power becomes threatened by the Gentiles’ resentment
against it, it produces “a satellite Jewish dissent” designed to control
and stir Gentile opposition. This Jewish dissent monopolizes the
protest and keeps non-Jewish dissenters in line. According to a parable
proposed by Atzmon, the purpose is to make sure that any Jewish problem
suffered by the Gentiles is treated by Jewish doctors, whose fundamental
interest is that the problem is not solved. By claiming to have the
solution to the problem, dissident Jews deceive Gentiles on the nature
of the problem, and ultimately aggravate the problem.

As
Atzmon sees it, the process does not necessarily result from a secret
agreement between Jewish power and Jewish dissent. The Jewish opposition
intellectuals

“are not necessarily consciously deceiving us; indeed, they may well be
doing their best, within the context of a limited tribal mindset. The
truth is, they cannot think out of the box, they cannot climb over the
ghetto walls that enclose their own tribal beings.”[21]

We
can see this tribal mindset as a collective instinct of conservation
that is part of the essence of Jewishness. Ideological quarrels between
Jews are sincere, but they remain quarrels between Jews, who tacitly
agree to speak louder than Gentiles and exclude from the discussion any
radical criticism of Jewishness.

In
the light of Atzmon’s analysis, it is conceivable that Christianity’s
primary function was to absorb Greco-Roman Judeophobia into a movement
that would ultimately reinforce the symbolic status of the Jews, by
spreading the “chosen people” propaganda myth fabricated five centuries
earlier. Ezra had convinced the Persians that the Jews worshipped the
God of Heaven like them; the Church went on convincing the Romans that,
before Jesus, the Jews had been the only people worshipping the
true God and loved by Him. Such creed from the Gentiles is worth a
thousand Balfour declarations, in the march toward world domination by
way of deception. In the Christian narrative that says, “God chose the
Jewish people, but then rejected them,” the benefit from the first part
is much higher than the cost of the second, which hardly makes sense
anyway.

If
the Italian rabbi Elijah Benamozegh is right in saying that “The
constitution of a universal religion is the ultimate goal of Judaism,”
then Christianity is a great step toward that glorious future: “In
Heaven, one God of all men, and on earth a single family of peoples,
among whom Israel is the eldest, responsible for the priestly function
of teaching and the administration of the true religion of humanity.”[22]
Christianity has prepared the way for the next stage: the cult of the
crucified Jew is now being superseded by the cult of the exterminated
Jews."

"Jews and the Left by Philip Mendes: A Review" (Sanderson), and the two comments by Anonymous[418]. It is a fair point to make that the atrocities performed and supported by Khazars aren't accurately described as 'left', and doing so seems motivated by a hatred of progressive politics, which muddles the real anti-gentilist crimes committed by Khazars. Everything (((they))) do is an attempt to improve their group supremacist position, and neither 'left' nor 'right' has any importance to (((them))). As we're seeing now in France, what really interests (((them))) is violent authoritarianism. We're actually giving them too much credit if go along with identifying them as 'left' in the attempts by the authoritarian personalities to blacken both progressive politics and the Khazars at once. See also the comment by Curmudgeon at The Occidental Observer:

"As I have often said, capitalism and communism are the two sides of the Jewish control coin. Both seek to concentrate wealth in the hands of the few, and each determines who is in the commune’s politburo that controls the commune. Once the politburo defines the commune and who benefits, everyone else is chattel of the commune.

Real socialism derived from the Trade Guilds that were systemically dismantled by governments while leaving the Merchant Guilds relatively untouched. The local branches of Trade Guilds were essentially cooperatives. They controlled the numbers of craftsmen and apprentices, production and quality of the product as well as the price. Inflation was virtually unknown. The system had flaws, but worked for hundreds of years. It was the Merchant Guilds that were infiltrated by Jews and eventually controlled. Merchant Guilds were always internationalists. While they depended on Trade Guilds for products for export, their real profit came in selling products, such as spices and tobacco, that were not available in their country.
As has been noted on this site, early socialists were anti-government. French socialist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon referred to Marx as the tapeworm in socialism. Marxism is communism, centralized control of government where the workers owning the means of production means the commne (and by extension what is defined as the commune) owns the means of. Real socialism is the locals who produce the product own the control of production. Real socialism is anti-government and anti-communist. Real socialism would never support an unending line of freeloaders into their collective draining their resources.
Real socialism died decades ago, and the closest models in Scandinavia committed suicide when Denmark joined the EEC and the others went multicultural through the tribe’s lobbying.
There is no perfect system, only systems that would be better without tribal influence."

"Facebook says far-right, anti-Muslim content doesn’t violate its standards" (to be read in light of all the banning that has been goping on, you foolish goyim):

"A recent report by the Toronto Star and BuzzFeed News showed
Never Again Canada, which has nearly 235,000 followers, spread
misleading content and used a URL-masking technique to deceive its
audience for months. The page also promotes and has ties to the Canadian
chapter of the Jewish Defense League, an offshoot of a U.S.
organization which the FBI has deemed a “right-wing terrorist group.”"

and:

"Previously,
Avi Shomer, Never Again Canada’s founder, said in an email that he
can’t be held responsible for all the content on the page because he is
simply one of 34 administrators and doesn’t know all of the others.
“I
was the guy who got it started, that does not mean that I now own or
control it. Since it has grown, it has spiralled out of my hands,”
Shomer’s statement read."

"In 2012 the Falwells travel to the Fontainebleau Miami Beach. There
they strike up a “friendly relationship” with a 21 year old pool boy on
staff named Giancarlo Granda. The couple is apparently very taken with
Giancarlo and soon they’re flying him on private jets up to Virginia,
providing him with financial assistance and eventually deciding to set
him as a business partner in the new Alton Hostel business venture.
Falwell, or technically his wife and son, put up a million dollars for a
downpayment on the property and then almost a million more on
renovations. This was all because they “wanted to help Granda establish a
new career and build a business.” They gave him an equity stake in the
business in exchange for him managing the property even though he had no
experience managing anything.
In other words, their staunch conservatism notwithstanding, the
Falwells put together a kind of bespoke one-man social democracy on
before of Miami millennial Giancarlo Granda for reasons that are less
than clear.
Now, this all sent tongues a’wagging: morally censorious Liberty
University chief poobah and his wife suddenly strike up a friendship
with a pool boy on a trip to Miami and decide they like him so much that
they were flying him on private jets and investing almost $2 million in
giving him a start at life.
Now, the other thing Roston got into was Michael Cohen’s role. It
turns out he’s the one who engineered Falwell’s endorsement of Trump in
January 2016. The relationship goes all the way back to 2012, the same
year Jerry and his wife met Giancarlo. In fact, not too long after the
three of them meet in Miami, Trump was invited to deliver the 2012
convocation speech at Liberty University. Trump was there. Cohen was
there. And Giancarlo was flown up for the event from Florida on the
private jet. Giancarlo was actually introduced to Trump. Falwell and
Cohen apparently stayed in touch going forward, usually checking in with
Michael at Trump Tower when he was in New York.
Clearly there was a lot here already to get people wondering what was
going on. But it was only in this new piece today where we got some
critical new information, the first direct reference to possible
extortion. In a call surreptitiously recorded by Tom Arnold, Cohen
admitted that he’d helped the Falwells deal with an extortion scam.
Someone was threatening to release compromising photos and Cohen made
the problem go away.

The Reuters article describes the photos like this …

Falwell, president of Liberty University, one of the
world’s largest Christian universities, said someone had come into
possession of what Cohen described as racy “personal” photographs — the
sort that would typically be kept “between husband and wife,” Cohen said
in the taped conversation.
…
The Falwells wanted to keep “a bunch of photographs, personal
photographs” from becoming public, Cohen told Arnold. “I actually have
one of the photos,” he said, without going into specifics. “It’s
terrible.”

The new article doesn’t say who was making the threats or where they
were from. But it does say the lawyers representing the person were in
Florida, a possible clue."

"Is Leaked Document Trump’s “Deal of the Century”?" (Cook). Leaked by Sheldon! Cook's point is good - why risk some huge backlash and the future of the entire stealing and murdering project in some Jared-ego-flattering mega-plan when the MIGAed Trump is giving the Khazars everything they could possibly dream of, bit by bit, leading to a stealthy cumulative win for all Khazars? Also, of course, we have the macher issue, with Sheldon having every interest in letting his plans unfold, instead of losing all the glory to the criminal Kushners in their (((media))) 'deal of the century' stunt.

Greenwald's sad response to the outing of The Intercept as a proven honeypot is Peak Whataboutism, what about the NYT?:

"Hale appears to be one of the only conscientious objectors during Obama administration who was willing to take the risk to inform the public what the government was doing as it expanded drone warfare in total secrecy."

"Earlier this week, Manning's lawyers filed court papers arguing that she should not be jailed for civil contempt because she has proven that she will stick to her principles and will not testify, no matter how long she is jailed.

Federal law only allows a recalcitrant witness to be jailed on civil contempt if there is a chance that the incarceration will coerce the witness into testifying. If a judge were to determine that incarcerating Manning were punitive rather than coercive, Manning would not be jailed."

At this point she is being punished for the crime of failing to respect the authority of the Swamp.

"Drone War Victims Deserve US Accountability, German Court Rules" (Gregston).

Life under a Rothschildocracy, the world's most evil form of government: "Gilet Jaune SITREP for Labor Day and Acte 25" (Le Saker Francophone):

"In Paris, as soon as 1 p.m., even before the procession starts, the
police officers started using tear gas to raise the tension. The police
violence reached a new high.
“The demonstration had not yet begun that the first traps were set up, the first sequences of gassings. There are still dozens and dozens of astonished testimonies of this delirious outburst of blows.
Those who demonstrated for the first time with this movement are
amazed. Those who are used to union processions have never seen this”.
The police spend its time breaking the long procession, cornering
small groups to gas and beat them. One of this sequence happened in
front of hospital La Salpétrière’s entrance gate.
On May 1, the government demonstrated its ability as a manipulator.
An intox on the attack on the Salpétrière hospital. Castaner, and the
plutocratic media following him, publicly stated that “the hospital of
La Pitié-salpêtrière was under attack by the “Gilets Jaunes” and saved
by the intervention of the police”. In reality, CRSs encircled demonstrators, cornered them in the entrance of the hospital so that, under the effect of tear gas, they were just looking for shelter inside the hospital. Nursesconfirm that not much has happened. Absolutely no attack. Even the newspaper Libération, then other mainstream media following, were forced to refute Castaner’s comments. Some people have however been arrested for “organized gang attacks”. Castaner is beginning to be seriouslyquestioned, even in the mainstream press. The case turns into a public scandal. Macron did not react."

"The Real Muellergate Scandal" (Murray). "Glaring Omissions and Misrepresentations in Mueller's Report by Larry C Johnson". Mueller is a pretty standard Swamp-creature, so nothing really surprising. There is an overarching standard Washington Official Story, and he sticks to it.

"Christopher Steele Made Damning Pre-FISA Confession; FBI Retroactively Classified" (Durden). The lies in the affidavits for the FISA warrants are the obvious place to take down a few Clintonista bureaucrats.

"Deranged Zionist John Bolton Reportedly Participates in Unusual Meeting With the CIA on Iran" (Rogers). "Trump, hostage to Bolton and Pompeo, Pleads with Iran to call and Rescue Him" (Cole). Trump's attempts to distance himself from shekelemployee Bolton is less than convincing.

"Mike Pence Claims Venezuela is Providing a Base for Iranian Terrorists" (Rogers). One of the more obvious ways the (((conspiracy))) ties together.

"Trump and his team of incompetents are reinforcing Maduro’s support within Venezuela and around the Western Hemisphere. Trump announced that Philip Goldberg, formerly the US ambassador to Bolivia, will take up the same post in Bogota, Colombia. In 2008, Goldberg was expelled from Bolivia for trying to overthrow the progressive government of President Evo Morales. Goldberg also previously served in Bogota as the coordinator of Plan Colombia, a discredited State Department program that was, in reality, a US weapons-transfer and intelligence-sharing operation for Colombian paramilitary units to commit human rights abuses against Colombia’s indigenous population, farm workers, and Afro-Caribbean people along the northern coast.

Goldberg’s modus operandi in Latin America is well known. The Bolivian government said Goldberg conspired with the opposition to foment unrest in Bolivia’s natural gas-rich provinces. Goldberg has also allowed the US embassy in La Paz and the US Peace Corps and Fulbright scholars in the country to be used for espionage purposes. Goldberg was also adept at coordinating terrorist attacks on key infrastructure components. On September 11, 2008 – note the date – a gas pipeline from Bolivia to Sao Paulo, Brazil was blown up by US-supported forces. Goldberg also coordinated anti-Morales actions of the right-wing governors of Santa Cruz, Pando, Beni, and Tarija. Opposition groups funded by the United States took over government buildings in the four states. Expect Goldberg, in coordination with Duque’s government, and President Jair Bolsonaro’s neo-fascist government in Brazil to carry out similar actions targeting Venezuela."

"Thinking fast and slow in reporting Israel-Gaza fighting" (Cobban). I think this gives the lying 'journalists' way too much credit. They are instructed to outright lie. If they don't, they will just be fired by the (((owners))), (((editors))) and (((publishers))) in the (((media))). Of course, (((they))) never have to fire anybody as the 'journalists' consistently lie.

"Expose: The Labour Party Treats Palestinian Supporters as Mental Cases" and "Why Not Make Parliament Into a Holocaust Memorial?" (Atzmon).

"Increase in range of Palestinian rockets forced Israel to offer Gaza truce: Hamas". Iron Dome was another big bust, (so you moron goyim who have already paid for it better hurry up and give us money for it): "Hamas says newly-developed tactic behind ‘Iron Dome’ failure" (it seems that if you fire two rockets at once, one directed at an empty area and one directed at your real target, the Iron Dome will let both through). "Will the U.S. And Israel Wage A "Summer War"?" (Moon). Imagine the glorious thought of a two-front rocket attack on Khazaria, from both Hezbollah and Hamas, with only the Iron Dome for protection!

"The Shale Boom Is About To Go Bust" (Cunningham). It is an excellent example of the crapification of all politics that shale oil extraction wasn't immediately banned everywhere. Despite Trump's destructive and dangerous efforts to keep the price of oil up with the sanction wars, there is still going to be a crash of the shale oil extractors, leaving behind their bankers who will need to be bailed out, a consequent recession that gaudy Wall Street fake numbers won't be able to hide, and permanent pollution left behind.

"Running for president is a cash bonanza" (Madsen). The crooks supposedly regulated by the FEC openly mock it, knowing that there will be no consequences: "Fox News star Jeanine Pirro's old Senate campaign told to file reports" (Lungariello).

"Corporate Media Target Gabbard for Her Anti-Interventionism—a Word They Can Barely Pronounce" (Walsh):

"Colbert’s exceptionalism argument, in particular, is reminiscent of
the centuries-old vision of the US as a “shining city upon a hill.” It’s
also a frame historically employed by media to rationalize the
country’s foreign policy. As communications scholar Andrew Rojecki wrote
in his 2008 research article (Political Communication, 2/4/08)
on elite commentary of George W. Bush’s military interventions in
Afghanistan and Iraq, “Over the course of the two crises, American
exceptionalist themes made up a constant background presence in elite
commentary and opinion.”
In other words, the assurance that Colbert has that the US has been
“a force for good in the world” has paved the way for some of the
greatest disasters of the modern world, including the 17-year-old war in
Afghanistan (or almost 40 years, if you date from the US deliberately provoking the 1979 Soviet intervention) and the half-million-plus killed in the Iraq War. Other difficult cases for proponents of intervention include Libya, where removing an authoritarian ruler devastated the nation and brought back slave markets,
and Syria, where hawks evade responsibility for the hundreds of
thousands killed in a US-backed effort to overthrow the government by
pretending that the US has failed to intervene.
Currently, in Venezuela, where Navarro is “very supportive of what
the United States is doing,” Washington has imposed sanctions that are
blamed for killing 40,000 in the last two years (CEPR, 4/25/19). Meanwhile, the US offers as a publicity stunt a convoy with “humanitarian aid” valued at less than 1 percent of the assets it has blocked Venezuela from spending."

While almost the entire American 'left' or 'progressive' (((media))) is nothing short of appalling - I'm certain it is because of ((('donor'))) problems - FAIR is consistently excellent.

"Calvin
himself had learned Hebrew from rabbis and heaped praise on the Jewish
people. He wrote in his commentary on Psalm 119: “Where did Our Lord
Jesus Christ and his apostles draw their doctrine, if not Moses? And
when we peel off all the layers, we find that the Gospel is simply an
exhibition of what Moses had already said.” The Covenant of God with the
Jewish people is irrevocable because “no promise of God can be undone.”
That Covenant, “in its substance and truth, is so similar to ours, that
we can call them one. The only difference is the order in which they
were given.”[7]

Within
one century, Calvinism, or Puritanism, became a dominant cultural and
political force in England. Jewish historian Cecil Roth explains:

“The religious developments of the seventeenth century brought to its
climax an unmistakable philo-semitic tendency in certain English
circles. Puritanism represented above all a return to the Bible, and
this automatically fostered a more favourable frame of mind towards the
people of the Old Testament.”[8]

Some
British Puritans went so far as to consider the Leviticus as still in
force; they circumcised their children and scrupulously respected the
Sabbath. Under Charles I (1625–1649), wrote Isaac d’Israeli (father of
Benjamin Disraeli), “it seemed that religion chiefly consisted of
Sabbatarian rigours; and that a British senate had been transformed into
a company of Hebrew Rabbis.”[9]
Wealthy Jews started to marry their daughters into the British
aristocracy, to the extent that, according to Hilaire Belloc’s estimate,
“with the opening of the twentieth century those of the great
territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood were the
exception.”[10]

The
influence of Puritanism on many aspects of British society naturally
extended to the United States. The national mythology of the “Pilgrim
Fathers” fleeing Egypt (Anglican England) and settling into the Promised
Land as the new chosen people, sets the tone. However, the Judaization
of American Christianity has not been a spontaneous process from within,
but rather one controlled by skillful manipulations from outside. For
the 19th century, a good example is the Scofield Reference
Bible, published in 1909 by Oxford University Press, under the
sponsorship of Samuel Untermeyer, a Wall Street lawyer, Federal Reserve
co-founder, and devoted Zionist, who would become the herald of the
“holy war” against Germany in 1933. The Scofield Bible is loaded with
highly tendentious footnotes. For example, Yahweh’s promise to Abraham
in Genesis 12:1-3 gets a two-thirds-page footnote explaining that “God
made an unconditional promise of blessings through Abram’s seed to the
nation of Israel to inherit a specific territory forever” (although
Jacob, who first received the name Israel, was not yet born”. The same
note explains that “Both O.T. and N.T. are full of post-Sinaitic
promises concerning Israel and the land which is to be Israel’s
everlasting possession,” accompanied by “a curse laid upon those who
persecute the Jews,” or “commit the sin of anti-Semitism.”[11]

As a
result of this kind of gross propaganda, most American Evangelicals
regard the creation of Israel in 1948 and its military victory in 1967
as miracles fulfilling biblical prophecies and heralding the second
coming of Christ. Jerry Falwell declared, “Right at the very top of our
priorities must be an unswerving commitment and devotion to the state of
Israel,” while Pat Robertson said “The future of this Nation [America]
may be at stake, because God will bless those that bless Israel.” As for
John Hagee, chairman of Christians United for Israel, he once declared:
“The United States must join Israel in a pre-emptive military strike
against Iran to fulfill God’s plan for both Israel and the West.”[12]

Gullible
Christians not only see God’s hand whenever Israel advances in its
self-prophesized destiny of world domination, but are ready to see
Israeli leaders themselves as prophets when they announce their own
false-flag crimes: Michael Evans, author of American Prophecies,
believes that Isser Harel, founder of Israeli secret services, had a
prophetic inspiration when, in 1980, he predicted that Islamic
terrorists would hit the Twin Towers.[13] Benjamin Netanyahu also boasted on CNN in 2006 to have prophesized 9/11 in 1995. To the less gullible, this tells a lot about the Jewish gift of prophecy."

and (you can see why the Jewish controlled opposition to Zionism hates Atzmon so much):

"Through
Christianity, Roman Judeophobia became Judaized. The Gospel narrative
makes the Jews the plotters against the Son of God, but this Son of God
is a Jew, and soon the “Mother of God”—as Isis, Ishtar or Artemis were
called—would be turned into a Jewess too. Most importantly, Judeophobic
Christians will adopt the Tanakh and the bizarre Jewish paradigm of the
“jealous god” with his “chosen people”. From that point of view, it is
as if Christ nailed on the Cross had been used as a bait to pull
anti-Jewish Gentiles, by the line of the Old Testament, into worshipping
Jewishness.

This process fits the concept of Jewish controlled opposition conceptualized by Gilad Atzmon in his book Being in Time and in a recent video.
Whenever Jewish power becomes threatened by the Gentiles’ resentment
against it, it produces “a satellite Jewish dissent” designed to control
and stir Gentile opposition. This Jewish dissent monopolizes the
protest and keeps non-Jewish dissenters in line. According to a parable
proposed by Atzmon, the purpose is to make sure that any Jewish problem
suffered by the Gentiles is treated by Jewish doctors, whose fundamental
interest is that the problem is not solved. By claiming to have the
solution to the problem, dissident Jews deceive Gentiles on the nature
of the problem, and ultimately aggravate the problem.

As
Atzmon sees it, the process does not necessarily result from a secret
agreement between Jewish power and Jewish dissent. The Jewish opposition
intellectuals

“are not necessarily consciously deceiving us; indeed, they may well be
doing their best, within the context of a limited tribal mindset. The
truth is, they cannot think out of the box, they cannot climb over the
ghetto walls that enclose their own tribal beings.”[21]

We
can see this tribal mindset as a collective instinct of conservation
that is part of the essence of Jewishness. Ideological quarrels between
Jews are sincere, but they remain quarrels between Jews, who tacitly
agree to speak louder than Gentiles and exclude from the discussion any
radical criticism of Jewishness.

In
the light of Atzmon’s analysis, it is conceivable that Christianity’s
primary function was to absorb Greco-Roman Judeophobia into a movement
that would ultimately reinforce the symbolic status of the Jews, by
spreading the “chosen people” propaganda myth fabricated five centuries
earlier. Ezra had convinced the Persians that the Jews worshipped the
God of Heaven like them; the Church went on convincing the Romans that,
before Jesus, the Jews had been the only people worshipping the
true God and loved by Him. Such creed from the Gentiles is worth a
thousand Balfour declarations, in the march toward world domination by
way of deception. In the Christian narrative that says, “God chose the
Jewish people, but then rejected them,” the benefit from the first part
is much higher than the cost of the second, which hardly makes sense
anyway.

If
the Italian rabbi Elijah Benamozegh is right in saying that “The
constitution of a universal religion is the ultimate goal of Judaism,”
then Christianity is a great step toward that glorious future: “In
Heaven, one God of all men, and on earth a single family of peoples,
among whom Israel is the eldest, responsible for the priestly function
of teaching and the administration of the true religion of humanity.”[22]
Christianity has prepared the way for the next stage: the cult of the
crucified Jew is now being superseded by the cult of the exterminated
Jews."

"Jews and the Left by Philip Mendes: A Review" (Sanderson), and the two comments by Anonymous[418]. It is a fair point to make that the atrocities performed and supported by Khazars aren't accurately described as 'left', and doing so seems motivated by a hatred of progressive politics, which muddles the real anti-gentilist crimes committed by Khazars. Everything (((they))) do is an attempt to improve their group supremacist position, and neither 'left' nor 'right' has any importance to (((them))). As we're seeing now in France, what really interests (((them))) is violent authoritarianism. We're actually giving them too much credit if go along with identifying them as 'left' in the attempts by the authoritarian personalities to blacken both progressive politics and the Khazars at once. See also the comment by Curmudgeon at The Occidental Observer:

"As I have often said, capitalism and communism are the two sides of the Jewish control coin. Both seek to concentrate wealth in the hands of the few, and each determines who is in the commune’s politburo that controls the commune. Once the politburo defines the commune and who benefits, everyone else is chattel of the commune.

Real socialism derived from the Trade Guilds that were systemically dismantled by governments while leaving the Merchant Guilds relatively untouched. The local branches of Trade Guilds were essentially cooperatives. They controlled the numbers of craftsmen and apprentices, production and quality of the product as well as the price. Inflation was virtually unknown. The system had flaws, but worked for hundreds of years. It was the Merchant Guilds that were infiltrated by Jews and eventually controlled. Merchant Guilds were always internationalists. While they depended on Trade Guilds for products for export, their real profit came in selling products, such as spices and tobacco, that were not available in their country.
As has been noted on this site, early socialists were anti-government. French socialist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon referred to Marx as the tapeworm in socialism. Marxism is communism, centralized control of government where the workers owning the means of production means the commne (and by extension what is defined as the commune) owns the means of. Real socialism is the locals who produce the product own the control of production. Real socialism is anti-government and anti-communist. Real socialism would never support an unending line of freeloaders into their collective draining their resources.
Real socialism died decades ago, and the closest models in Scandinavia committed suicide when Denmark joined the EEC and the others went multicultural through the tribe’s lobbying.
There is no perfect system, only systems that would be better without tribal influence."

"Facebook says far-right, anti-Muslim content doesn’t violate its standards" (to be read in light of all the banning that has been goping on, you foolish goyim):

"A recent report by the Toronto Star and BuzzFeed News showed
Never Again Canada, which has nearly 235,000 followers, spread
misleading content and used a URL-masking technique to deceive its
audience for months. The page also promotes and has ties to the Canadian
chapter of the Jewish Defense League, an offshoot of a U.S.
organization which the FBI has deemed a “right-wing terrorist group.”"

and:

"Previously,
Avi Shomer, Never Again Canada’s founder, said in an email that he
can’t be held responsible for all the content on the page because he is
simply one of 34 administrators and doesn’t know all of the others.
“I
was the guy who got it started, that does not mean that I now own or
control it. Since it has grown, it has spiralled out of my hands,”
Shomer’s statement read."

"In 2012 the Falwells travel to the Fontainebleau Miami Beach. There
they strike up a “friendly relationship” with a 21 year old pool boy on
staff named Giancarlo Granda. The couple is apparently very taken with
Giancarlo and soon they’re flying him on private jets up to Virginia,
providing him with financial assistance and eventually deciding to set
him as a business partner in the new Alton Hostel business venture.
Falwell, or technically his wife and son, put up a million dollars for a
downpayment on the property and then almost a million more on
renovations. This was all because they “wanted to help Granda establish a
new career and build a business.” They gave him an equity stake in the
business in exchange for him managing the property even though he had no
experience managing anything.
In other words, their staunch conservatism notwithstanding, the
Falwells put together a kind of bespoke one-man social democracy on
before of Miami millennial Giancarlo Granda for reasons that are less
than clear.
Now, this all sent tongues a’wagging: morally censorious Liberty
University chief poobah and his wife suddenly strike up a friendship
with a pool boy on a trip to Miami and decide they like him so much that
they were flying him on private jets and investing almost $2 million in
giving him a start at life.
Now, the other thing Roston got into was Michael Cohen’s role. It
turns out he’s the one who engineered Falwell’s endorsement of Trump in
January 2016. The relationship goes all the way back to 2012, the same
year Jerry and his wife met Giancarlo. In fact, not too long after the
three of them meet in Miami, Trump was invited to deliver the 2012
convocation speech at Liberty University. Trump was there. Cohen was
there. And Giancarlo was flown up for the event from Florida on the
private jet. Giancarlo was actually introduced to Trump. Falwell and
Cohen apparently stayed in touch going forward, usually checking in with
Michael at Trump Tower when he was in New York.
Clearly there was a lot here already to get people wondering what was
going on. But it was only in this new piece today where we got some
critical new information, the first direct reference to possible
extortion. In a call surreptitiously recorded by Tom Arnold, Cohen
admitted that he’d helped the Falwells deal with an extortion scam.
Someone was threatening to release compromising photos and Cohen made
the problem go away.

The Reuters article describes the photos like this …

Falwell, president of Liberty University, one of the
world’s largest Christian universities, said someone had come into
possession of what Cohen described as racy “personal” photographs — the
sort that would typically be kept “between husband and wife,” Cohen said
in the taped conversation.
…
The Falwells wanted to keep “a bunch of photographs, personal
photographs” from becoming public, Cohen told Arnold. “I actually have
one of the photos,” he said, without going into specifics. “It’s
terrible.”

The new article doesn’t say who was making the threats or where they
were from. But it does say the lawyers representing the person were in
Florida, a possible clue."