Sunday, October 22, 2006

A Call for Unity between Secular, Spiritual, and Religious Progressives

June 3, 2006

Realizing that our shared commitment to human rights, religious freedom, and peace and social justice, significantly outweighs our differences; we the undersigned, comprised of both secular and religious progressives, declare an alliance between progressive, rational-minded people regardless of one’s spiritual, religious, or secular perspective.

While our beliefs about the existence of God may differ, progressive Americans share a common tradition of humanism dating back to at least the Renaissance. Many spiritual and religious thinkers have significantly contributed to the advancement of doubt, free thinking, and the sciences, laying the ground work for the Enlightenment and modernity. There is no “cultural war” dividing us.

While we make no apologies for the beliefs that have helped to shape our character, we acknowledge that neither faith in God nor atheism suffices to define one’s ethical character. We maintain that the character of a human being can only be defined and evaluated on the basis of one’s actions.

We agree that fanaticism, be it religious or secular, is the true enemy of reason and of human progress.

We therefore formally reject the proposition that one cannot be both religious and rational. And we patently reject the notion that people of faith are incapable of respecting modern science and evolution.

We equally reject the point of view that implies one must believe in God or hold a specific religious belief in order to be valued as a moral/ethical being.

We call upon our movements to unite for the betterment of our society and to reject the enmity of pundits who have made their careers out of promoting intolerance and hatred.

We affirm the plurality of our nation and the importance of maintaining the wall of separation between civic and religious authorities in order to preserve the democratic principle of freedom of and from religion.

Our nation has been carved into a maze of horrors: torture, war, poverty, gross spending on warfare, corruption, religious fanaticism, sexism, homophobia, bigotry and intolerance. Progressive people both with and without religious faith must work together if we are to correct these injustices.

We, the undersigned, agree that given our nation’s many ethical and societal challenges, secular, spiritual and religious progressives must set aside their differences to work together to create a better world.

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Campaigns Wikia has a mailing list, and we broke into an abortion discussion today. Temporary, I hope. Here's my position today:

Doesn't the Bible teach that life begins at the first breath? Isn'tpart of the mythology that Mary had to decide whether or not to endher pregnancy? Or at least whether Joseph would stay with Mary untilthe child was born?

If it is against the Western tradition to "kill babies" or (myaddition) allow them to be killed, why don't our laws require that allchildren receive free health care paid for by the community from themoment of conception to the moment of natural death? Why aren't we doeverything in our power to prevent abortions by teaching our teenagersabout birth control along side the "just say no" concept that isfailing us so badly?

I'll tell you why. Because the Catholic Church teaches that we willpay for our sins in some future eternity, and that any suffering thatwe have to endure in this life is insignificant. The same mentalityteaches radical Muslims that their reward in a future life will bebeyond their imagination if they create suffering for their enemies inthis life.

It's a lie. It's a tool used to encourage the domination of the manyunder the hand of the few. It's a justification used to force peopleto tolerate the intolerable, to allow the inexcusable and toaccomplish the unthinkable.

We have one world. This one. We have one life to have an influenceover. This one. The Bible tells us to be "fruitful and multiply".It does not tell us to be fruitful and multiply to the point that ourpopulation numbers make life unbearable and unsustainable. G-d setthe rules of the game, and has granted us with free will to play thegame. If we destroy the game board, G-d is not going to save us. Hewill wait a few million years and try again with a new species. Hehas all the time in the Universe. We don't.

I will agree to a 100% ban on abortions when we have completelyeliminated unwanted pregnancy from the earth. If we could worktogether, we could do both. Big "IF", isn't it.

Support my work

If you like what I write, or the work that I have done, you are welcome to support me. The money I earn through this blog goes to help pay my bills and build my foundation so that I can do even more in the future. Please contact me if what I have been doing is of benefit to you.

About Me

Chad Lupkes is a progressive political activist in Seattle, Washington. After fighting cancer in 2003 and realizing that 47+ Million people in the United States didn't have access to health care he determined that that will change.