Question of the Day

Do you support a path to citizenship for Dreamers?

In the words of Hollywood mogul David Geffen, “Everybody in politics lies.” But lies some politicians tell that damage a person’s character in the eyes of voters and ultimately lead to his defeat are damnable lies that need to be corrected.

Last fall, about a month before the November election, the Associated Press ran a story that claimed Sen. George Allen, Virginia Republican, had failed to disclose stock options he had earned while serving as a director of Commonwealth Biotechnologies Inc. (CBI). The story suggested Mr. Allen might have violated ethics rules because the company, based in Richmond, had done business with the state when he was governor. Mr. Allen had served on CBI’s board between his departure as governor and his election to the Senate.

Mr. Allen reported the stock options in 2000 but did not file subsequent reports because the price of CBI stock plunged, making the options worth less than he paid for them, denying him a profit.

Last October, the Associated Press ran a story that said Mr. Allen failed to report his CBI stock options and hinted at possible wrongdoing by Mr. Allen when he was governor because the company had done business with the state. This was all Mr. Allen’s challenger, now Sen. James Webb, and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee headed by New York Sen. Chuck Schumer needed. They prepared an attack ad, claiming Mr. Allen’s stock options were worth $1.1 million and were not worthless, as he had claimed.

The ad also made the connection between CBI and the state, charging Mr. Allen tried to “steer government contracts to a company that paid him in stock options.” AP did not report anything about Mr. Allen trying to steer government contracts to the state, but Jim Webb “approved this message” anyway.

An analysis of the negative ad by AP political writer Bob Lewis revealed its inaccuracies. One must conclude that, since the information was available to Mr. Webb and Mr. Schumer, the two deliberately used factual inaccuracies in the negative ad. But why let truth get in the way of an effective election strategy?

The damage was done and since the ad fit nicely into the Democrats’ theme of “the culture of corruption” in the Republican majority, the desired result was achieved. Mr. Allen lost the election by 9,000 votes.

The Allen camp asked for a formal ruling by the Senate Ethics Committee and on Feb. 16, it came. In a letter to Mr. Allen, signed by Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer, California Democrat and Committee Vice Chairman John Cornyn, Texas Republican, Mr. Allen was exonerated of any wrongdoing: “The committee has determined that your ownership of CBI stock options did not constitute deferred compensation during the relevant reporting periods.” Therefore, they said, Mr. Allen was not required to amend the reports.

Mr. Allen made his share of mistakes during his re-election campaign, but this was not one of them. His opponent and Mr. Schumer, neither of whom has apologized or retracted their accusations, unfairly smeared him.

In commenting on the Senate Ethics Committee letter and the incorrect negative ad that contributed to Mr. Allen’s defeat, a Richmond Times Dispatch editorial asked a question familiar to many public figures who have been unfairly slimed, “So where does George Allen go to get his reputation back, never mind his job in the Senate?”

Where, indeed? The AP printed a story on Feb. 21 correcting the errors in its earlier story that were used in the Allen attack ad, but it came nearly four months too late.

This saga is important for a number of reasons. First, it cost a good man an important job. Second, it significantly contributed to a change in the balance of power in the Senate. Third, it again exposed an unholy alliance between liberal politicians and the leftist big media who are quick to attack someone whose policies and party they don’t like, but rarely correct errors of their own making, or investigate bogus charges when they help the policies and party the media prefer.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.