Cameron considers U-turn on students as migrants

In more UK news, speculation has been raised over whether Prime Minister David Cameron will reconsider including foreign students in net migration figures – which experts say could cost the country £2.6bn – after a source from the Prime Minister’s office, No. 10 Downing Street has been quoted saying that Cameron “understands these arguments and is definitely considering a change of policy”.

Prime Minister David Cameron is considering a policy change in student immigration according to a Downing Street source

Share this:

About Sara CusterSara is an international education journalist from Oklahoma. She completed her BA in Chicago, taught English in Barcelona and landed in London to be an international student herself completing a master's in international journalism.

"The UK should follow our competitors and take students out of the net migration targets"

The latest MPs to join the increasingly polemic ‘students as migrants’ debate, which has been winning headlines in the UK press recently, are a Conservative and Labour MP who over the weekend published a joint article in newspaper, TheSunday Times hoping to build a cross party consensus on the issue.

“Recent changes to the student visa system have unfortunately broadcast the message that foreign students are unwelcome,” wrote Labour MP from Sheffield Paul Blomfield and Nadhim Zawahi, Conservative MP for Stratford-upon-Avon. “We’ve already seen a dramatic fall in students coming from traditional markets like India.”

UK higher education exports alone contribute almost £8bn a year to Britain’s economy; a figure Bloomfield and Zawahi argue contributes to facilities and teaching for domestic students. “Our borders policy should not be in competition with our growth policy. After all, it’s not the case that international students are displacing domestic students, the revenue they bring in helps to subsidise facilities and teaching for UK-born students.”

“Our borders policy should not be in competition with our growth policy”

The MPs argue that taking students out of the net migration numbers would also allow the country to be more competitive with the other big players like the US and Australia who have both recently relaxed migration policy after seeing international student numbers fall.

Speaking with The PIE News, Bloomfield said the policy has damaged the UK’s ability to recruit students from overseas. “I’m pleased that the article has helped to put the spotlight on this important issue, and I hope the government will listen and rethink this area of policy.”

“Under the current system UK Border Agency officers are unable to refuse some applications”

Meanwhile, UK Immigration Minister Damian Green has announced new rules today that will mean interviews for up to 5% of student visa applicants.

Due to start on 30 July , the policy will result in 10,000 to 14,000 applicants for student visas interviewed each year – about 5% of those who apply to come to Britain from outside Europe. The new move gives UKBA officials power to deny entry to overseas students after an interview.

“Under the current system UK Border Agency officers are unable to refuse some applications even if they have serious concerns over the credibility of the student. We are toughening up the system to keep out the fraudulent and unqualified while ensuring genuine students benefit from our country’s excellent education sector,” said Green.

Update: Immigration Minister Damian Green met with the Home Affairs Committee on 10 July and denied rumours that the government would make a u-turn on its policy to not include international students in net migration figures. Green said that students, like other immigrants, use public services and that “trying to define our way out of the problem of uncontrolled immigration is wrong”.

Still looking? Find by category:

Add your comment

Disclaimer: All user contributions posted on this site are those of the user ONLY and NOT those of The PIE Ltd or its associated trademarks, websites and services. The PIE Ltd does not necessarily endorse, support, sanction, encourage, verify or agree with any comments, opinions or statements or other content provided by users.