Khan Owes Apologies to Trump, the Military, and the Country

Khizr Khan, the father of the war hero, owes apologies to Donald Trump, to the American military, and to the American people, far more than Trump owes apologies to Khan. This article expands on what the African-American neuroscientist Ben Carson said on CNN, as published in Mediaite

Carson pointed out that Khan slandered Trump, but Carson didn’t elaborate. This article elaborates and supplements what Carson said.

First of all, Khan accused Trump of being anti-Muslim, racist, and anti-women. These allegations were rebutted in many places, including an article that I wrote that was previously published at Canada Free Press

Trump has already refined his proposed policy to screen out potential infiltrators from ISIS and other terrorist groups by TEMPORARILY restricting the inflow of people from countries that have a significant presence of terrorists, so Trump is not opposed to Muslims per se, and evidence he is not opposed to women or African-Americans is also clearly a matter of public record.

Also, as discussed elsewhere, Trump did indeed call Khan’s son a hero, and his only negative comment about any of the Khans was a flippant comment about Khan’s wife that appears to have simply been intended as a dig at the fact that Muslims often keep their women out of the limelight, while Trump respects women’s right to be seen and heard, and gives them more executive jobs than he gives men, contrasted with Hillary’s record of harassing women who accused Bill Clinton of unwanted advances.

Most importantly, as to the accusation that Trump didn’t sacrifice his son, neither did the Clintons serve in the army or sacrifice their daughter; furthermore, Trump’s big mistake was to claim that building an empire was a sacrifice when Trump actually did make sacrifices himself, perhaps even more than Khan the father of the soldier. Khan’s son enlisted; not Khan the father, so the sacrifice was actually that of Khan’s son, not Khan. But even as to Khan’s son, when he enlisted, he didn’t expect to die, although he knew it was a risk (although his heroism later, in battle, is beyond dispute) but when Trump entered the presidential race, he knew for sure he would be sacrificing millions of his own dollars for his public service, he would be sacrificing his time and energy, he would be taking away many hours of himself and his children that would otherwise have been devoted to making money for themselves, and enjoying the life of the rich and the famous, and he put his own life at risk and the lives of his children, who all became targets of hate-mongers as a result of Trump’s candidacy and false accusers, and Trump is sure to lose a lot of business and to find it harder to get permits etc. as a result of the lies against him alleging suddenly that he is a racist etc., when until he ran for office he was considered relatively mainstream, so in sum Trump sacrificed and continues to sacrifice a lot by running for president; these are all clear and certain sacrifices.

Khan the father also had a record of advocating Sharia law in writing, which trumps the Constitution in his mind, so his public advocacy of the Constitution at the Democratic convention may have itself actually been fraudulent. Furthermore, the Constitution allows Congress to regulate immigration, and it has been pointed out elsewhere that ultra-liberal Presidents Roosevelt and Carter were far worse than even Trump as falsely portrayed, by not merely preventing certain non-Americans from entering the country in the time of war, but even interning those who were already here, and Carter even expelled Iranians after a single incident involving Iranians, while Roosevelt prevented Jews from entering the country during World War II even when a boatload reached our shores, and this act of prevention was not a temporary matter (as Trump’s proposal) but a clear and obvious death sentence when the Jews were shipped back to areas controlled by Hitler.

Khan the father has ties to the notoriously anti-democratic Muslim Brotherhood.

Khan the father made a living out of processing the immigration papers of Muslims, so his anti-Trump tirades were tainted by a conflict of interest.

Khan the father worked for a law firm with ties to the Clintons, another conflict of interest.

Khan the father caused many veterans to mistakenly be conned into believing that Trump insulted veterans, when Trump did not, thereby cutting unfairly into a significant segment of Trump’s base.

Because of Khan’s slandering of Trump with all the false accusations referred to above, in the context of the information alluded to above, Khan was a significant factor in Trump’s post-convention slide, which could cost the election to Trump, which would not simply be a loss to Trump, but also a loss to the military, the veterans, and the country, since Clinton has clearly proven she cannot be trusted with national security secrets, let alone national policy; she and Obama can’t be trusted to identify, let alone to fight and root out Islamic radical terrorists effectively.

Hillary would let even more radical Islamic terrorists into America than Obama has done, with a failure to vet them properly coupled with a failure to close all borders effectively; she would give more rights and benefits to criminals than to many law-abiding citizens; America’s military has been depleted during the watches of Obama and Hillary, causing our soldiers to be in greater danger than otherwise when sent to war, and America is generally seen as less trusted than ever by its allies and more coddled than ever by its adversaries. Just mention the countries of Israel, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Turkey, for starters – or non-starters.

Not only should Khan apologize, but also all of the people who spread and continue to spread Khan’s false accusations should apologize. If any don’t – and almost all won’t – all Americans should at least consider what Khan said in context, and then adjust their attitudes toward Trump accordingly.

~ Then there is this rebuttal for Kahn~ H/T VM…

Correctly attributed or not, this says it all! Bravo for whoever wrote it!

Only a military mom could write such a fantastic testimony and rebuke to the Muslim pawn used by Hillary’s campaign at the Dem Convention to trash Donald Trump. The Facebook letter below is so great and so powerful that it’s gone viral. We hope you will read and share because it’s time to support our military 100% in this war against terror!

To the Muslim Gold Star father that spoke at the DNC…..I have some thoughts on your comments. I am a Blue Star mother. My deepest condolences on the loss of your son. No family should have to endure such a loss. That being said….while your son is a hero, you Sir, are NOT. My son has served three tours of combat in the countries you and your family came from. Iraq and Afghanistan were his introduction to adulthood and service to something bigger than our individual selves. He was blown up by an IED set by your countrymen. His Purple Heart is a testament to his love of America and our freedoms. I have suffered through his multiple combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan….never knowing from moment to moment if he would return home in a flag draped coffin. It is torture when a mother wakes up to this day after day and sees the atrocities happening over there on the news and being helpless to change a thing. My comments to you will probably offend you. I do not apologize. These things need to be said. Unlike you, I could NEVER use my son’s death as a pawn piece in support of a woman that left “America’s treasure” (Hillarys words) to die unaided in Benghazi. The same woman that says vile things to her military details there to protect her. You, Sir, are supposed to be a witness to your son’s bravery and sacrifice. Instead you stood on a stage and promoted the woman that upholds the very people that killed your son. You became a political PAWN that promotes pandering to our enemy. You desecrated your son’s memory by your words. You did not utter one word of outrage at anyone but Donald Trump. Are you forgetting that Trump did not kill your son. He had nothing whatsoever to do with these wars. His memory should mean more to you than five minutes of fame on the stage of the party that voted to send your son to war. The same party that for eight years has denied and cheated our veterans out of their deserved medical care. Who for the last three years has cut our veterans pay.

Of note…your wife stood SILENT. She stood with her head covered, never uttering a word about her loss. She submitted to you being her voice in front of the country. She abdicated her free voice to you…..as would any good Sharia wife and mother. Let me say, this was not lost on the other American military moms….myself included. Had it been my son being “used” as a political PROP, no one could have silenced me. I would be voicing my grief, my pride, my love of him to the world. A man cannot speak to a mothers loss. No man knows her heart at the loss of a child. She did her heroic son a disservice by her silence. She should have uncovered her head and her heart to be the American mother you claim. And last if all….you dared to flash your picket Constitution and ask if Trump has read it. I dare to ask you, Sir….HAVE YOU READ IT? If you say yes, then I dare ask you HOW you could represent that party? HOW can you support this woman? How can you affiliate your family with a party and candidate that cannot even call the radicals that killed your son what they are? How can you support a current administration that diminishes your son’s death by denying he had an enemy? And if you have read our Constitution, how could you cover your soulmate in colorful submissive sheets and have the audacity to speak FOR her? Your son died for that Constitution you so carelessly waved around on national TV in support of the very party that exists to destroy it. As a soldier’s mother….NO ONE could ever speak for me. I find your outrage artificial. I find your party affiliation offensive. I find your wife’s silence atrocious and offensive. I find YOU a political FOOL. I find your son to have been your greatest accomplishment, and you, Sir, have dishonored him. I hope you memorize that picket constitution so you will understand what it means to be a REAL American and hero. You are not one. You were USED. Your son WOULD NOT be proud of you. My only hope is that when MY son goes a fourth time to combat radical Islamic terrorist’s, ( and he WILL) he will know that his mother never stood submissively SILENT about an American hero. Yes, your son was a hero that could not be manipulated but, you, Sir, are a weak minded FOOL. I would love to hear your thoughts this morning about the 1500 American soldiers on the air base in Turkey being held as basic hostages as I type. Not a word from this president or party you adore…or the media that so thoroughly manipulated and used you and your wife. So…what say you Sir??? What will you say to a Blue and Gold Star family if these heroes die? In my opinion, you will say NOTHING.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The Letter above says it all…. I can not add a single word that has not already been said here.

3 Responses to Khan Owes Apologies to Trump, the Military, and the Country

Well done BlessedB! The fact is Trump is NOT going to end his bid. The fact is the liberal media only regurgitates the text provided by Hillary (stupid saps can’t think for themselves you see). The fact is most of the polls spouting Hillary is far ahead are PAID or made to skew the numbers to her side. Grassroots questions show the margin voting against Hillary or in most cases for Trump to be at least twice her percentages.

Our Friends (Kick-Ass Bloggers):

Adrienne’s Corner

Earl of Taint

Grunt of Monte Cristo

Intellectual Froglegs

Peppermint Farm

Rifleman III Journal

Right Ring (Bullright)

The Anti-Liberal Zone (Gunny G)

The View from the Island (BrianR)

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.