Statistics from Altmetric.com

Question What is the effectiveness of diets, drug treatment, and behavioural interventions for infantile colic?

Data sources

Studies were identified by searching Medline (1966–96), EMBASE/Excerpta Medica (1986–95), and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register with the terms colic and crying. Bibliographies of relevant studies were scanned.

Study selection

Published studies on the treatment of infantile colic were selected if reduction in crying or colic was the main outcome measure. Exclusion criteria were publication in abstracts or letters, infants with a normal pattern of crying or whose mothers had not complained about the crying, infants ≥6 months old, <3 days treatment, or no control group.

Data extraction

Data were extracted on age, sex, age at onset of infantile colic, number of hours of crying each day, proportions of breast fed and firstborn infants, dropout rates, effect sizes, quality scores (maximum 5 points), and family history of atopy.

Commentary

Infantile colic can cause considerable distress to a family. The average infant cries for 2–3 hours/day, whereas the infant with colic usually cries for >4 hours/day and appears to have severe abdominal pain.1 Parents often must deal with the child's behaviour while sifting through a maze of conflicting suggestions from well meaning friends and family.

Lucassen et al reviewed the published evidence that evaluates the effectiveness of all diets, drug treatments, behavioural interventions, and other treatments for infantile colic. In their comprehensive review, the authors used a highly sensitive search strategy and extensive reference checking. They also repeated the meta-analysis after removing trials that scored low in methodological quality. This review is limited by its exclusion of unpublished studies. Herbal teas are presented as an effective treatment but only 1 article is included to support this strategy. The usefulness of this intervention is also limited by the lack of a clear description of how tea is used (eg, how much, how often, how strong).

This review shows that anticholinergics, particularly dicyclomine, were effective; however, the considerable side effects (ie, breathing difficulties, seizures, syncope, asphyxia, muscular hypotonia, and coma) would severely limit their use in practice.

Further studies are required on dietary treatment, herbal teas, and modified anticholinergic drugs that do not have serious side effects. Lucassen et al report a range of effective treatment choices. The non-invasiveness of most of the interventions allows parents to choose strategies that are conducive to their parenting styles and capabilities. The authors remind clinicians to investigate the obvious reasons for excessive crying before immediately labelling the behaviour as “colic.” Once these have been ruled out, the healthcare provider can offer strategiesthat are evidence based and that are proved to be effective.

Footnotes

A modified version of this abstract appears in Evidence-Based Medicine.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information:

Copyright 1999 by the RCN Publishing Company and BMJ Publishing Group for Evidence-Based Nursing