Re: What will it take to convince people there's more to race than "Skin Pigmentation"?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seeqasa

Talking to Liberals, one thing that's constant is you can never talk to them about race without them giving you the "The only difference between races is skin color" crap. The fact is, so long as people believe that they'll always believe it's only a matter of "helping them" "giving them stuff" "being honest and fair" to make them nice upstanding citizens.

Now, we all know that's bogus, but what can we do to combat this? This is what is really keeping people from becoming racially-aware. It's sad, and I'd think seeing all the chaos and destruction non-whites cause would be enough to show them (it certainly did for me), but sadly it isn't, and as a result we spend more time and effort wasting our time on these people that never do any good, when we could be helping white people.

It's very simple:

show them pictures or real life examples of:

1) White people with darker skin
2) Non-white people with lighter skin or with albinism.

I've seen a link to such pictures on this forum, but I can't remember where it is at the moment.

Skin color is a less important factor in determining race than face and skeletal structure.

And let's look at these genetics here, just like I was describing in my previous post, we can dissect this all...it all falls right in line, just as I was saying. So, she had white kids huh? Well, what is wrong with this picture. First off these kids aren't white by a far shot. I mean if people want to call them white, then go ahead and call them white, I don't really care. Let's get down to the problems though. First, off they popped out with some rare albinism (which I have my own thoughts on about purity of these rare disorders and how they come about, and the possible cross with white genes somewhere in their family tree....just like I have my thoughts on the freckled, red hair/dark hair, can't get a tan for nothing gene type that I also believe has traces of impurity somewhere in the family tree). So, what's wrong with these kids. Well, just like I was talking about skin pigmentation in my previous post, these kids might look "white", but their pigmentation is horrible. They won't be able to get a tan for nothing, and will get burnt and wrinkley if they ever spent a good bit of time out in the sun. No matter how much people might want to say they are white they still have that "funny" look to them and you can tell something is wrong with their genetics. Their noses lean toward negroid as well as their bone structures. They just have the albinism gene in their family is all. They still are far from pure.

they are probably either partial albinos or so called throw backs.
Even two dark skinned American blacks can sometimes give birth to a totally white looking child due to the mixed genetic make up of black Americans.

its most likely that this woman has mixed racial genes especially since almost all Brazilians have some degree of racially mixed heritage.

Re: What will it take to convince people there's more to race than "Skin Pigmentation"?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cleverland

they are probaly either partial albinos or so called throw backs.

If he hadn't altered what was said on the link you'd have known they were albinos.

Here's the correct quote, that doesn't include the word White, that was introduced purely by Unregistered! to deceive.

"Parents Rosemere Fernandes de Andrade and her partner Joao are dark-skinned Afro-Brazilians, yet three of their five children are albinos."

It goes on to state "Mrs Fernandes, 27,says she struggles to pay the medical bills for daughters Ruth, 10, and Esthefany, eight, as well as five-year-old son Kauan.

She must also buy expensive sun-block and extra clothing to protect their skin.

The mother of five has also been challenged by security guards who insisted she could not be the children's mother.

Mrs Fernandes, of Olinda, said: 'I'm afraid of skin cancer because I can't afford the protection they need.'

A spokesman from Albinism Fellowship said: 'It can be hard for parents when they are faced with a baby who is much fairer than either parent.

'In most cases children with albinism are born to parents who have no previous experience of the condition. From the first day of their new baby's life, the parents often find themselves on a steep learning curve.'

For more information and support for those affected by the condition visit Albinism.org.uk"

So the whole original post was deceitful, and based around a lie, that Unregistered! knowingly inserted.

He merely found an article on albinos, and then altered it to say something completely different, in an attempt to push a lie.

It's rather pathetic that someone feels a need to alter news stories, to push their silly agendas of hate.

Re: What will it take to convince people there's more to race than "Skin Pigmentation"?

Basic evolution tells us that with thousands of years of isolation there are bound to be differences. The so called skin color is but one example. What is difficult is convincing people that these racial differences are significant enough to make us incompatible with one another. This, coupled with the fact that most people cannot think rationally, makes convincing anyone of anything an arduous task.

Re: What will it take to convince people there's more to race than "Skin Pigmentation"?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny Mathews

If he hadn't altered what was said on the link you'd have known they were albinos.

Here's the correct quote, that doesn't include the word White, that was introduced purely by Unregistered! to deceive.

"Parents Rosemere Fernandes de Andrade and her partner Joao are dark-skinned Afro-Brazilians, yet three of their five children are albinos."

It goes on to state "Mrs Fernandes, 27,says she struggles to pay the medical bills for daughters Ruth, 10, and Esthefany, eight, as well as five-year-old son Kauan.

She must also buy expensive sun-block and extra clothing to protect their skin.

The mother of five has also been challenged by security guards who insisted she could not be the children's mother.

Mrs Fernandes, of Olinda, said: 'I'm afraid of skin cancer because I can't afford the protection they need.'

A spokesman from Albinism Fellowship said: 'It can be hard for parents when they are faced with a baby who is much fairer than either parent.

'In most cases children with albinism are born to parents who have no previous experience of the condition. From the first day of their new baby's life, the parents often find themselves on a steep learning curve.'

For more information and support for those affected by the condition visit Albinism.org.uk"

So the whole original post was deceitful, and based around a lie, that Unregistered! knowingly inserted.

He merely found an article on albinos, and then altered it to say something completely different, in an attempt to push a lie.

It's rather pathetic that someone feels a need to alter news stories, to push their silly agendas of hate.

well their mixed genes are also playing a part in their looks to some degree the hair and the boys features and so on.
But yes get your point the main factor is albinism and the article itself refered to albinism.

Still a post like that has to be good for white nationalists since it gives you the chance to highlight the dirty tricks distorted messages and outright falsehoods the other side will tell in their determination to sell their idea that race does not exist.

Re: What will it take to convince people there's more to race than "Skin Pigmentation"?

Hi guys. I'm genuinely curious as to your beliefs on how much of an effect skin colour really plays; because I, myself, am an olive-skinned person. My heritage is consists entirely of Mediterranean Europe. I speak as a white person, I behave as a white person would, I am regarded in my community as most certainly white, I consider myself to be white and yet when I look at my skin, I realise that I am not "white". What would the users of Stormfront consider me to be?

Re: What will it take to convince people there's more to race than "Skin Pigmentation"?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Question from the curious

Hi guys. I'm genuinely curious as to your beliefs on how much of an effect skin colour really plays; because I, myself, am an olive-skinned person. My heritage is consists entirely of Mediterranean Europe. I speak as a white person, I behave as a white person would, I am regarded in my community as most certainly white, I consider myself to be white and yet when I look at my skin, I realise that I am not "white". What would the users of Stormfront consider me to be?

Here is the problem with the word "White". Alot of people associate white with being "fair-skinned". By this definition, Southern Europeans who are more olive skinned are excluded, while light skinned or albino people with non-European ancestry are included. However, according to White Nationalism, white people are defined as the indigenous people of Europe and their diaspora as long as they are not mixed; A Gentile of wholly European ancestry. This would include darker, southern Europeans while excluding fair skinned or albino people with non-European ancestry. Not all white people are fair skinned and not all fair skinned people are white.

Some limit the definition of white people even further to fair skinned Gentiles of wholly European ancestry. Sadly, an example is Australia, where the term "wog" refers to any Aussie who is not of Anglo-Celtic stock, including people of southern European ancestry. However, White Nationalists in Australia would not exclude southern Europeans, and to them "wog" is synonymous with "non-white".