As this is the same author, and if he is the real author, without any plagiarism involved, there is nothing wrong about publishing of the same material in different magazines. The only sin would be the lack of the reference to author's own work (which would reveal that the later work in not original, which would be a right thing; actually, the decent author should clearly indicate that this is some kind of compilation work).

Some publishers require only the original work, which can create some problems. As far as I know, CodeProject is the site where non-original works are considered as fine. But of course, the reference to the original work, as well as the clear statement that some work is not original should be there. I would rather write to the author and convince him to modify one of two of these articles to add appropriate statements and references or cross-references. If the author is interested in getting more trust and authority, it would only help him.

So, Bill, could you do it by yourself, as the original reporter of this problem? If you want to reference to this post, it would be fine.

Seriously, I can't see the article [allegedly too low a rep] so I won't vote.

Seen who has voted, so I've joined you.

Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'HOK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DDEthel CrudacreI cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - TrollslayerHave a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett

I'm not too sure myself, and I skimmed the article.As an example of the OP's grasp of English as she is wrote, the title is "Aads Education, a Photocopier of Best Training Institute of Java in Hyderabad"

Which strains my brain a little to work out what the heck he actually meant to say in the first place!

Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water

I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.Stephen Hawking

I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.Stephen Hawking

It appears that this[^] member is using sock-puppet accounts or friends to promote his articles and commercial products. This is definitely one that falls in a grey area. The issue is that the two accounts below are answering questions with links to this guy's commercial products and CP articles. The reason I mention the article links is that the language and syntax of the answers appear that they are the same person and likely the same person as this original main account. This original account is also spamming as there are links to his commercial products in the articles, but the articles are not in the 3rd party sections.

I think you are on to something here, but I think it is even worse. I believe Lacy00[^] is another sock puppet with a published tip[^]. This tip is in the 3rd Party Products section, so should be fine on its own.I became aware of this profile when I saw this message[^], which is a reply to the other sock puppet's (pandaloveu) message and looks very much like Solution 1[^] by Miracle524.

I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.Stephen Hawking

The later author actually references the original as his inspiration. I believe the more recent author Frankensteined the original article for his purposes, but without proper care. I will suspend Frank and see if the author is willing to revisit his creation.

Well, I wonder: did someone banned the account just because someone called himself "Niger"?

That it something I would not be sure about. This word is acceptable depending on the language, not just culture and does not have to be ideological. No one protests the name "Nigeria" and many similar things which merely conduct a notion of the color. Everyone understands the conventionality of the notion: a human skin cannot really be "white" or "black"; and I think all reasonable people agree that it cannot characterize a human's personality in any way.

And all kinds of self-identification belong to some shaky ground… So, what could be the reason for removing of the account?

That's why I said I wasn't sure, I just pointed it out and let admins make a decision... it's hard to tell in an international site what people mean when they use certain words. In any case, the account was fairly new (only had one post), so it wouldn't really hurt the user to chose a different name and open another account.

You're applying American criminal law to a website... It's really just up to the admins to decide... not that I disagree that everyone needs the benefit of the doubt, but its just not necessarily the case in a site.

Sorry for being unclear; I'm not trying to apply American law, not literally; I just provide the example of reasonable approach, the analogy.As to the "American law", well… there is no such thing even formally. In my view (sorry for the off-topic and questionable private opinion), there is no real law it all. There are written federal laws, state laws, a lot of exaggerated activity, but to me, it does not look like a Law from the capital letter 'L'. Well, in some other places, it's worse…

As to the principle of "reasonable doubt", the principle of "presumption of innocence", they are fundamental principles of the society. I hope not just Western…

I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.Stephen Hawking