It seems that on SO there are people who monitor your acceptance rate when you dare to ask questions. I asked a couple ofquestions recently and I was told, in no uncertain terms that I have to improve my acceptance rate in order to get better answers.

My acceptance rate is 51%, is that still too low? If it is, then I can't expect any quality answers out of this question, because my meta acceptance rate is only slightly better here on Meta, at 53%.

Edit: Just to make things clear, I do contribute to the SO extensively (418 answers and counting), and when I ask question, I make sure that my question is of high quality one ( as can be proven from the number of upvotes I got per question). The answerers might not get accepted answers from me but they can get a lot of upvotes, which is a form of appropriate reward.

8 Answers
8

Yes. If you feel that none of the answers solve your problem, then you should go back and answer it yourself with what you did to move past the problem, and then accept your own answer.

If someone came close to a solution, then accept their answer and edit it or comment on it with why it wasn't perfect, but how it helped resolve your issue.

If you are asking subjective questions (ie, you are looking for an "ideal" or "best" solution) that bring a lot of work arounds, but no answer is 'elegant enough' for you, then yes - people are justified in looking at your future questions and moving past them because they can see they have a low chance of meeting your needs.

But they are your questions, and your reasons for selecting or not selecting an answer are your own.

People will badger you to increase your accept rate because it's obvious that very few answers meet your standards, and your questions will be passed by more than those with a higher accept rate.

I agree with this. On one of the questions I asked on SO I accepted the answer even though it wasn't 100% correct because it led me to the solution which I also posted as an answer.
–
ChrisFJan 8 '10 at 19:35

You've asked a number of subjective, almost "community-wiki" style questions. In one case you've got 24 answers with the top answer earning 81 up votes. It wouldn't hurt to reward that answer and increase your accept stats.

I think you could accept some answers without it being a pure excercise in raising your accept stats. My current view of your SO account is that you ask some good questions, often get a lot of good answers, but that you don't often reward people with the accept.

Just to cherry pick an example. I looked at your most viewed question where you asked about uploading files, and it received some great answers. You even commented on one of them "Thanks! Seem to be exactly what I wanted". Then didn't accept it. Rather than worry about what % is correct, I'd suggest reviewing those asked questions and evaluating whether any answer is correct. Clearly, you didn't fulfill your responsibility with that question. Perhaps, there are more like that.

51% is a perfectly acceptable accept rate. But mine is 85%. Perhaps the quality of the questions you are asking is a bit low. Ask questions that can be answered with a single, correct answer, and it becomes easier to accept the correct answer.

51% on 383 Questions is much too low in my opinion - it means that ~190 of your Questions do not have an accepted answer.

It's more about absolute Numbers here. If you have 10 or 20 questions, then <50% is still okay as it sometimes takes time to really test the answers or because there are simply no good answers. But more than 20 Questions without answers? That really seems a bit much.

I would recommend doing a search for "hasaccepted:0 wiki:0 closed:0 user:3834" and checking if there are questions that have a good answer (no, not randomly picking one just to bump the AR)

Personally, I view accept rate as a measure of how much attention the questioner is likely to pay to my answer. I'm in this for the pleasure of helping others, the pleasure of the sound of my own typing, rep and badges, and assorted other reasons, but let's look at my first reason.

If somebody frequently asks questions and rarely accepts answers, that suggests that either the questioner throws questions out to die and doesn't look at them again, or doesn't find them helpful. In either case, I don't get the feeling that I'm likely to be helpful, so I'm less likely to answer (and definitely less likely to do any work at all to give a good answer).

For me, an accept rate of 50% suggests somebody who does pay attention to answers, and is likely to be helped, who is skittish about accepting answers for whatever reason. That means I'm likely to answer a question if I think I can be helpful.