Tort law - Essay Example

Tort law Name Institution Date Tort Law Tort law is one of the widely applied laws in the English common law. It cuts across from the social to the professional fields. It is widely used as a measure to govern the people against any form of injury or harm from those people who are considered to be responsible of their well-being…

Extract of sample"Tort law"

Download file to see previous pages
In fact, a number of critics have advocated for an amendment of this law. In its general statement, there is no absolute obligation of an individual to a duty, but there is a duty not to cause harm. This article will focus on the general application of this law, as well as the various exceptions that are provided. The tort law is used to govern the actions of ordinary persons or professionals that can cause harm to those under their care. The tort law is usually applied to defend the right of an individual who suffers injury as a result of breach of duty by their caretaker. In the court, this is accomplished through financial compensation or an injunction. Financial compensation means that the injured person is compensated with money that is perceived to be equivalent to the damage or injury that they incurred. Injunction refers to the stoppage of an unfair act that causes harm to the subject. The person who is placing such a suit is called the plaintiff, while the sued person is referred to as the defendant (Lunney& Oliphant, 2008). This law is characterized by a number of elements. First, an element of duty or responsibility must be evident. For example, the nurses in a hospital have a duty to ensure that all the beds used by patients are comfortable and in order. Secondly, the element of negligence must exist. Negligence refers to the failure to implement the expected duties hence causing harm to the plaintiff. A good example is when a nurse fails to check the condition of a bed and it breaks down resulting in an injury to a patient. In such a case, it is obvious that the patient suffered injuries because the nurse failed to conduct their duties as expected (Lunney& Oliphant, 2008). Therefore, the implementation of this law requires that it is proven beyond doubt that the Offedant had a duty to offer care to the plaintiff but breached this duty. Also, there must exist a causative relationship between the damage and the negligent action. This means that the law only qualifies if the damage was a result of the breach of duty. Hence, the judge needs to establish that all these elements are present in the case before passing any judgment. In professional application, negligence refers to the failure to act in accordance with the set standards of the duties of a competent practitioner. For instance, the doctors must meet the set professional standards in medical practice. If any harm results from compromise of set standards, then the doctor would be liable (Lunney& Oliphant, 2008). In comparison to the Saudi law, the Tort English law is more efficient in defending the subjects of injury or damage. This is because it gives the plaintiff a privilege to act as an adequate witness in court. The major drawback in Saudi law is that the plaintiff is not allowed to testify. The subjects of the case are regarded as unreliable and biased witnesses. Therefore, the plaintiff is allowed only to provide written allegations before the court. On the other hand, the defendant is allowed to defend themselves orally. This is a disadvantage for the plaintiff as the Saudi law puts more weight on oral testimony than on written allegations. A good example is a case in Saudi court that involved a British citizen who had visited Saudi on vacation. He suffered a spinal injury as a result of being hit by an overgrown Coral while sitting on a wooden platform. The plaintiff lost the case. Other disadvantages in Saudi courts are lack
...Download file to see next pagesRead More

A claimant for nervous shock has to submit evidence of having undergone serious psychiatric injury. Moreover, such psychiatric injury should be other than passing sorrow or fear. Such claims have to be supported by medical evidence, and the judiciary has depicted willingness to lend credence to claims entailing nervous shock.1 In order to advise Newns store in respect of its liability against its customers, the following issues have to be addressed: Whether the Newns company owes a duty of care towards Paul, Edith, Joanna and Cindy.

Fred’s claim against Paul regarding the capital gains tax I believe Fred is entitled to sue Paul for the suffered economic loss because of the neglected duty of care on behalf of the latter. Paul had advised Fred to sell some of his stocks and shares in order to avoid the capital gains tax.

In this case, Mr Jones sustained an injury as a result of an accident at his workplace on 13th of September 2010. He works for Cwmfelin University as a maintenance man. Whilst he was walking down some stairs at the University on the day in question, he lost his footing on a loose step and lost balance which subsequently resulted in the injury.

The researcher of the essay states that under the tort law, if anyone suffers a legal, economical or physical harm, she or he may be entitled to file a suit which when considered to be valid. Issues of nuisance, the issues arising in form of liability in the tort of negligence and causation are mentioned in the essay.

In other terms, tort refers to a collection of rights, responsibilities and remedies applicable in the justice system, more so in civil lawsuits to compensate and relieve those affected or harmed by the wrongful actions or omissions by others1. Those who sustain injuries or losses due to tortious conducts are referred to as plaintiffs while those responsible for the injuries and are liable for the damages are referred to as defendants or tortfeasors2.

However, the classifications of the wrong as committed are done over a wide range of considerations in order to verify such a claim. For instance there are torts which result from an intentional motive by a person to harm another (intentional torts) while there are others that result from one’s faults but are not intentional.

n they dunked the ball; City General Hospital 35% for their policy of turning away people without insurance; Nurse Williams 5% because she followed the unethical policy and for not giving Bobby the necessary treatment to save Bobby’s wrist; the county hospital 25% and Dr.

ast could cause his PTSD and the accident by itself could not result in such an occurrence, he could claim that experiencing flashbacks from the crash that have exacerbated his childhood experiences. However, it will be essential for him to get an expert clinical psychologist or

The argument behind this case is that the occupier conducting the construction operations is aware of the danger and therefore is under obligation to offer protection.
One such case which was controversial was

The language that most of the judges use while dealing with the issues involving duty tends to mask the fact that the decision and conclusion whether or not, there is an existence of a duty in accordance to the law is based on

2 Pages(500 words)Essay

GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!

TRY US!

sponsored ads

Save Your Time for More Important Things

Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Tort law"
with a personal 20% discount.