Act Locally » September 4, 2006

Follow the Prison Money Trail

Email this article to a friend

your email

your name

recipient(s) email (comma separated)

message

captcha

While New Mexico’s landscape may make the state the Land of Enchantment, its rapidly growing rates of incarceration have been utterly disenchanting. What’s worse, New Mexico is at the top of the nation’s list for privatizing prisons; nearly one-half of the state’s prisons and jails are run by corporations.

Supposedly, states turn to private companies to cope better with chronic overcrowding and for low-cost management. However, a closer look suggests a different rationale. A recent report from the Montana-based Institute on Money in State Politics reveals that during the 2002 and 2004 election cycles, private prison companies, directors, executives and lobbyists gave $3.3 million to candidates and state political parties across 44 states.

According to Edwin Bender, executive director of the Institute on Money in State Politics, private prison companies strongly favor giving to states with the toughest sentencing laws–in essence, the ones that are more likely to come up with the bodies to fill prison beds. Those states, adds Bender, are also the ones most likely to have passed “three-strikes” laws. Those laws, first passed by Washington state voters in 1993 and then California voters in 1994, quickly swept the nation. They were largely based on “cookie-cutter legislation” pushed by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), some of whose members come from the ranks of private prison companies.

Florida leads the pack in terms of private prison dollars, with its candidates and political parties receiving almost 20 percent of their total contributions from private prison companies and their affiliates. Florida already has five privately owned and operated prisons, with a sixth on the way. It’s also privatized the bulk of its juvenile detention system. Texas and New Jersey are close behind.

But in Florida, some of the influence peddling finally seems to be backfiring. Florida State Corrections Secretary James McDonough alarmed private prison companies with a comment during an Aug. 2 morning call-in radio show. “I actually think the state is better at running the prisons,” McDonough told an interviewer. His comments followed an internal audit last year by the state’s Department of Management Services, which demonstrated that Florida overpaid private prison operators by $1.3 million.

Things may no longer be quite as sunny as they once were in Florida for the likes of Nashville, Tenn.-based Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and the former Wackenhut, now known as the GEO Group of Boca Raton, Fla. But with a little bit of spiel-tinkering–and a shift of attention to other states–the prison privatizers are likely to keep going.

The key shift, Bender explains, is that “the prison industry has gone from a we-can-save-you-money pitch to an economic-development model pitch.”

In other words, says Bender, “you need [their] prisons for jobs.”

If political donations are any measure, economically challenged and poverty-stricken states like New Mexico are a great target. In this campaign cycle, Democratic Gov. Bill Richardson has already received more contributions from a private prison company than any other politician campaigning for state office in the United States. The Institute of Money in State Politics, which traced the donations, reported that GEO has contributed $42,750 to Richardson since 2005–and another $8,000 to his running mate, Lt. Gov. Diane Denish.

Another $30,000 went from GEO to the Richardson-headed Democratic Governors Association this past March. Richardson’s PAC, Moving America Forward, was another prominent recipient of GEO donations. Now, its former head, prominent state capitol lobbyist Joe Velasquez, is a registered lobbyist for GEO Care Inc., a healthcare subsidiary that runs a hospital in New Mexico.

But don’t get the idea that GEO has any particular love for Democrats: $95,000 from the corporation went to the Republican Governors Association last year alone. What companies like GEO do love are the millions of dollars rolling in from lucrative New Mexico contracts to run the Lea County Correctional Facility (operating budget: $25 million/year), and the Guadalupe County Correctional Facility ($13 million/year), among others. CCA also owns and operates the state’s only women’s facility in Grants ($11 million per year).

To make sure that those dollars keep flowing, GEO and CCA have perfected the art of the “very tight revolving door,” says Bender, which involves snapping up former corrections administrators, PAC lobbyists and state officials to serve as consultants to private prison companies.

In fact, the current New Mexico Corrections Department Secretary Joe Williams was once on GEO’s payroll as their warden of the Lea County Correctional Facility. Earlier this year, Williams was placed on unpaid administrative leave after accusations surfaced that he spent state travel and phone funds to pursue a very close relationship with Ann Casey. Casey is a registered lobbyist in New Mexico for Wexford Health Sources, which provides health care for prisoners at Grants, and Aramark, which provides most of the state’s inmate meals. In her non-lobbying hours, it turns out that Casey is also an assistant warden at a state prison in Centralia, Ill.

It appears that even for a prison industry enchanted by public-private partnership, Williams and Casey may have gone too far.

See why we’re re-inventing the In These Times magazine, and how you can be part of it.

Silja J.A. Talvi, a senior editor at In These Times, is an investigative journalist and essayist with credits in many dozens of newspapers and magazines nationwide, including The Nation, Salon, Santa Fe Reporter, Utne, and the Christian Science Monitor.

Of course they are investing for elections as this will serve as the their investment for their business. Even other type of businesses are also investing. nono hair removalPosted by Trina Jackson on 2011-01-26 01:42:39

It is easier for the state governments to dole out the cash for the private prisons than take on the burden of incarcerating and rehabilitating inmates. That way they can pass the blame along and keep themselves clean. As tax paying citizens it is our money that paying for these failing prisons. We need to hold our elected officials accountable.
___________________________________________________
70-647 | 70-648 | 70-649 | 70-652 | 70-653 | 70-662 | 70-663 | 70-680Posted by Auston321 on 2011-01-04 04:42:42

This really is an awesome post, I’m happy I recently found. I have been trying to find guest writers for my blog so if you ever decide that’s something you are interested in please feel free to contact me. I will be back to look at out more of your articles later! truth about absPosted by leo goldwin on 2010-12-26 11:53:31

In many ways the private prison industry is at least more overt in their stance towards the oppression of people as a result of the prisoner trade. Whereby, in California you have the Prison Guards Union operating with a 22 million dollar annual budget, at least 3 full-time lobbyists, and a staff of 90 pushing tough on people (also known as "tough on crime") legislation. You have the guards union supporting the victims rights movement with both budget and office accomodations. . . lots of people are making lots of money off the prisoner trade, CCA and the GEO group are simply more overt about their human trafficking.Posted by dpstein on 2006-09-05 11:21:11

Beyond any incestuous relationship between state governments and private prison companies, I think the article would have benefited from addressing other issues that can be measured almost as easily as money changing hands. For instance, the living conditions found in state v. private prisons, recidivism rates for convicts housed in each, rates of reported abuse of prisoners by correctional officers for each, rates of inmate abuse of each other, etc. Florida Corrections Secretary McDonough said he thinks "the state is better at running prisons", but the reader is left with only that quote, with no indication of what he was referring to in practical terms.
Also, I have to disagree with the author that it's "worse" for prisons to be privately run, relative to New Mexico's high incarceration rates, which are merely said to be "disenchanting" without further elaboration. High incarceration rates are among the top factors driving the problem of prisons being unmanageable by states, and are one big source of the perceived need to privatize in the first place, over and above the issue of profit.
Perhaps another article can follow up along these lines if the agenda is to show that privately run prisons are inherently more objectionable than state-run facilities, since this one had a primary focus upon allegations of corrupt financial relationships.Posted by Kuya on 2006-09-05 01:00:00