Oh, the color given for these numbers was green, but I don't know how to make it happen here.......

My computer skills are pitiful.

Maggie-Nolia

Hi There,

I have checked all of your numbers...they are ALL correct...

dman2005,

This what I get for Maggie-Nolia, Please recheck me.

Carbob

Numbers

3 - Way

4 - Way

Totals

1026

5

4

9

1035

2

6

8

3402

3

3

6

2089

4

3

7

3079

4

4

8

4069

9

3

12

4078

2

1

3

6508

3

4

7

1279

2

3

5

3 WAY

1026

6

1

6

1

3

8

7

2

0

0

2

1

9

1

0

8

9

7

6

1

2

1

9

1

0

8

9

7

6

1

6

2

9

9

9

1

17

4

0

6

9

2

9

8

6

1

18

6

9

0

1035

1

5

5

9

1

0

3

3

7

7

1

5

5

9

1

0

3

3

7

7

2089

2

1

9

1

0

8

9

7

6

1

7

2

8

3

7

0

16

9

8

9

7

2

8

3

7

0

16

9

8

9

9

2

9

8

6

1

18

6

9

0

4069

6

2

9

9

9

1

17

4

0

6

6

2

9

9

9

1

17

4

0

6

6

2

9

9

9

1

17

4

0

6

6

2

9

9

9

1

17

4

0

6

1

9

0

6

6

5

2

9

8

4

1

9

0

6

6

5

2

9

8

4

7

4

4

0

6

9

11

2

3

5

7

4

4

0

6

9

11

2

3

5

0

4

9

8

6

7

12

2

3

6

1279

1

7

0

4

2

5

13

3

9

7

1

7

0

4

2

5

13

3

9

7

6508

1

9

0

6

6

5

2

9

8

4

1

9

0

6

6

5

2

9

8

4

6

2

7

0

8

4

5

8

5

3

6

2

7

0

8

4

5

8

5

3

Hi There,

All of the pick 4 are correct...

I never checked the 3 way..but am doing that now...I notice that you are counting 2 matches for the same number in one box...we can only count multiple matches as a count of 1...so 1026 is a 3 way count of 4....I will check the others in a few minutes...

All of these and BlackApple's observations have inspired me to want to take a good look at SKIPS again, but in a different way than I did before, time ago.

Please do with a small example

It will be 1 to 3 more weeks before I check that idea, if it has merit and is of use, then I will tell you about it, it is very hard to implement, it would use very many past draws and has to be worked with software, if the software can't do the needed functions then it can't be done at all.

It involves the counting of very many many skips in a very particular way, would be very hard to do by hand, if my software can't do it, then I might try to do an small sample by hand, but it could not give the same results that way.

It has to do of course with skip statistics, but a very particular kind of skip statistics, a very hard to do kind.

I can at least tell you, what I would like to check out and you can give me your ideas on it, even if I don't do the actual checking.

Hey Sanddollar, why don't you understand that I checked yours and you have many mistakes still? Don't post misinformation above when people are trying to help you get it right. Look at my previous posts and fix your post above. Thanks. not trying to be harsh, just know that one bad group could cost bad information to the group later by Cash. I don't think this is ever going to get totally correct by everyone and here we are 77 pages later. Cash, are you tracking posts and follow up posts by others double checking people? I hope so. Do we want to assign people to double check like dman? He has been amazing. Good luck to us all getting this correct.

Hey sand, how did you fix this? Look at my post on page 65 showing you what I saw. I suggest you delete your post above and repost with CORRECT information. Did you do your 3 way's right? Did you double check? I hope so. Thanks.