Gold Member

Many of BAA security staff are indeed morons, but in their defence they're trained and managed by morons. OK, so that's a sweeping generalisation, but when I think of BAA senior management, the image that comes to mind isn't one of innovation, and efficiency but incompetence and avarice.

Sadly, the passenger was pretty accurate in describing security staff as drones. Were they ever faced with a real security situation I'd wager most would freeze or maybe wet themselves - assuming they even recognised it.

From yesterday's London Metro (free paper):

"My mate set off the alarms and was searched. But then the guy told me to stop and said 'you cannot get on the plane because there is a gun on your T-shirt'" he said.

Mr Jayakody, from Bayswater, West London was then threatened with arrest after he asked to see the security chief.

He said: "It's a cartoon robot with a gun as an arm. What was I going to do, use the shirt to pretend I have a gun?

"I was flabbergasted. I thought the supervisor would come over and see sense, but he didn't. After I changed he said if I changed back I would be arrested."

"I've done what they've said. No point in arguing with the drones.

"The supervisor comes over and is now a dick to me, telling me if I put the shirt on I'll be arrested.

"I then told him that I wasn't going to waste time arguing with him and he wasn't worth the effort and didn't have any power to change anything anyway."

To play devil's advocate for a moment; in view of the last couple of paragraphs - we don't know if the passenger was offensive or hostile when questioned about the shirt or after changing ... and he's hardly likely to volunteer that.

Still, aviation is a grubby business, and I doubt BAA are exceptional. For example:
"In 2006 a human rights activist was prevented from boarding a plane in New York, for while wearing a T-shirt that read, "We will not be silent," in English and Arabic."

I 'wonder' which language caused the 'offence'.

While such incidents are surreal from a common sense perspective, they're unsurprising given the sort of people commonly employed to do these jobs. A capacity for critical thinking is clearly considered optional in a role where it should be mandatory. Again, I'm generalising, but in my experience in dealing with airport security (which is not insignificant) it's not an entirely unjustified one.