Not guilty by reason of life is hard

One of the interesting things about the intramural dynamic between left and right liberals is that it is sometimes the ‘conservatives’ or right-liberals who craft the newest, latest, most progressive innovations in the ways in which liberalism attacks and destroys the natural moral order. In order to stay respectable conservatives sometimes have to out-progress the progressives.

Share this:

Like this:

Related

§ 12 Responses to Not guilty by reason of life is hard

I have a hard time figuring out your stance on this given posts like this or “ignorance is the eighth sacrament.” Are you saying that 1) “diminished capacity” defenses are legitimate but overused? 2) that they are legit but don’t change an immoral acts into a moral ones? 3) diminished capacity is so much nonsense? Or some combination of the three.

“A distinction is not always adequately drawn between ‘voluntary’ and ‘free’ acts. A person may clearly and willingly desire something evil, but do so as the result of an irresistible passion or a poor upbringing. In such cases, while the decision is voluntary, inasmuch as it does not run counter to the inclination of their desire, it is not free, since it is practically impossible for them not to choose that evil. We see this in the case of compulsive drug addicts. When they want a fix, they want it completely, yet they are so conditioned that at that moment no other decision is possible. Their decision is voluntary but not free.”

In order to stay respectable conservatives sometimes have to out-progress the progressives.

I disagree that mainstream conservatives are doing anything really new.

One noteworthy aspect of the whole furor has been how readily mainstream conservatives reach for what they would denounce in other contexts as sob-story ‘liberal criminologies’. Such approaches to offenders excuse them by painting them as primarily a victim of factors outside their control: such as economic circumstances, pressures from peers, family, or society, miseducation or a lack of education (e.g. “women these days are misinformed about what a fetus is”.)

So mainstream conservatives are merely co-opting left-liberal ideas and applying them to a different context and successfully persuading many, including themselves, as conservatism always heads leftwards.

It is true that this is basically the leftist narrative on crime, applied to women and abortion specifically: the perpetrator is really a victim because of upbringing, merely lacks education and opportunity, blah blah blah.

The difference though is that under the ‘traditional’ (hah!) leftist narrative of crime and punishment it was still admitted that dangerous criminals who had committed murder needed ‘rehabilitation’: we reluctantly still had to exercise some sort of politically correct authority over them to ‘rehabilitate’ them, etc.

The ‘conservative’ innovation in the case of women who procure abortion is the elimination of even that thin, politically correct exercise of ‘rehabilitative’ authority in enforcing the law.