2012年9月20日星期四

Take it easy, U.S.

Christopher Stevens, the American ambassador, and three
other embassy staff were killed in Libya in 11Spe. 2012. I am very
sorry to hear that. I think Hillary certainly can not figure out why the United States spent
money and efforts to help the Libyan people to overthrow the dictatorship, in
order to establish a democratic country, but just a small personal movie aroused
them to anti-American. Hillary was born in United States where is full of freedom,
democracy, openness, human rights, of course she can not understand the
mentality of those people.

1 Poverty

There is no doubt that the majority of those attacks are the
proletarians. They don't have job or income, so they are fragile, sensitive,
and easily enlarge their anger and dissatisfaction with society because of an Individual
event. I think that is another form of hatred of the rich. Karl Marx's words: proletarians
have nothing to lose, so they don’t have any limitations and can show the ugly
side of human nature. Helping them out of poverty is the most essential.

2Real desires should come
from within

Real desire should come from deep inside of people, like sense
of well – being or sense of security, no one can give them, but only
themselves, as same as orgasm, whatever female or male, the desire for orgasm
must come from within, no one can help you, regardless how hard work they have.
Before the people don’t really realize and accept the universal values from within,
and arouse the desire for change from deep inside, it doesn’t work only rely on
outside forces from the U.S..
The only result is the United
States put herself into a quagmire and
passive. The U.S.
only can give them a shell of democracy, but the spirit of democracy should come
from within of the nation, they must have their own Voltaire and Rousseau, they
have to recognize the human rights, government agencies, and religious from deep
soul. A real change must come from the within, then to the behavior.

3 Values export

Cultural values ​​export is slow, maybe
take some years, even decades or centuries, especially in some areas where religion
above the law and sovereignty above human rights. They can’t understand why Dutch
accepted it when Philip II, King of Spain, announced that the Netherlands is an
integral part of Spain in the 16th century, and Dutch recognized it when Spain
sent a new Governor, but Dutch began to rebel when Philip II wanted to get
money from their pockets. They can’t understand at last the Dutch actually
entrusted their own country to the Queen of UK Elizabeth I. Thoughts of people
there were detained by tradition cultural generations after generations. The U.S. should
change their values ideologically one step a time.

U.S. wants to help
these countries into the modern society, not only in the material, but also more
importantly, in their values, and the U.S. really has a long way to go. In
many less developed regions, people still rely on the blood and religion to
organize social activities, rather than on the law and contract. Dictatorship
can be overthrown easily by U.S.
powerful weapons, but the inferiority root of a nation is hard to change in
short time. I don’t understand the culture of the Arab, but I know Chinese very
well. Although a lot of people in the United States against one child
policy, and thought it is inhumane to restrict human rights, but I do not agree
to the views at this point, because Americans do not understand the Chinese
people at all. The only purpose of everyone is maximize the payoffs and minimize
the costs, but according to different values in different nations. Chinese
people now still in the original situation of gene spread, and most of them
will choose to have lots of children in order to seize social resources as much
as they can, of course the blood is the most reliable to expand their own
interests radius, in order to maximize their own interests, at last, the
ultimate goal is to increase the sense of security. If this policy is canceled,
I think Chinese population will quickly reach 20 billion in the next 10 years. So
American democracy and freedom should be on the ground.

Modernization of a nation doesn’t only mean have powerful
weapons, or drive advanced cars, or use iPhone 5, but mainly refers to modern
values​​. The U.S.
has good intention to help the world people into modern society, because she
has fully realized world integration – global village, helping people of other
countries into the modern is to help herself in long term, but the U.S.
must draw lessons from the British in the 19th century. The British was known
as the sun never set Empire in the 19th century, but in the end of the 19th
century, many overseas colonies brought Britain more and more trouble and
burden, not only in money spending, but also in troops sending, finally the smart
British had to choose to give up to maximize the payoffs and minimize the costs.
I think America should learn
something from UK.
Relationship between the two countries is as same as relationship between two
people. Whether the two get along well with each other depends on the consistency
of core values of the two in long-term, but the benefit in short-term. For
example, the relationship between U.S., China and Japan, frankly speaking,
China who has1.4 billion population and 9.6 million square
kilometers is more useful to U.S. than Japan, but because of the political
system of Communist dictatorship, I think U.S. will stand on the Japanese side,
would rather sacrifice the economic interests in China in short term. I hope U.S. doesn’t be kidnapped by Japan, please
give more time to Chinese poor people.