No, they don't. Are you serious with this $#@!? Trump's problem with U.S. wars is that the military didn't rob those people after they were done killing them. That's non-interventionist?

agreed.

The ultimate minority is the individual. Protect the individual from Democracy and you will protect all groups of individuals

Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual. - Thomas Jefferson

I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

"ISIS is making a tremendous amount of money because they have certain oil camps, certain areas of oil that they took away," Trump said.

He continued: "They have some in Syria, some in Iraq. I would bomb the s--- out of 'em. I would just bomb those suckers. That's right. I'd blow up the pipes. ... I'd blow up every single inch. There would be nothing left. And you know what, you'll get Exxon to come in there and in two months, you ever see these guys, how good they are, the great oil companies? They’ll rebuild that sucker, brand new — it'll be beautiful."

I've seen this many times and had some good jollies over it but this time when it was finished there was this other clip showing her explanation of what happened. Now I feel sorry for her because she really was nervous on stage and blew it big time in front of millions of people and now the clip is there playing every day. It must be hard for an 18 year old to live that down. Anyway, here's her explanation and her new better answer for the "question"... (of course this was 2007 and hopefully this is not a big issue for her now)

I've seen this many times and had some good jollies over it but this time when it was finished there was this other clip showing her explanation of what happened. Now I feel sorry for her because she really was nervous on stage and blew it big time in front of millions of people and now the clip is there playing every day. It must be hard for an 18 year old to live that down. Anyway, here's her explanation and her new better answer for the "question"... (of course this was 2007 and hopefully this is not a big issue for her now)

Yes, it was an embarrassing slip-up that will follow her around.

However, she has a something going for her that Sarah Palin either never had, or lost quite a while ago.......

"Every post is about Hillary and pedophilia. I love them both soooo much!!!!!!!" Zippyjuan

I've seen this many times and had some good jollies over it but this time when it was finished there was this other clip showing her explanation of what happened. Now I feel sorry for her because she really was nervous on stage and blew it big time in front of millions of people and now the clip is there playing every day. It must be hard for an 18 year old to live that down. Anyway, here's her explanation and her new better answer for the "question"... (of course this was 2007 and hopefully this is not a big issue for her now)

Is Palin the best public speaker? No, but she shouldn't be discredited for it. I'm not a Palin fan but she didn't have to mention Rand but she did, maybe it was to take a shot at Cruz but I think overall it was a positive comment.

Also as for the pageant girl, it's not easy getting asked a question on the spot and answering on a national stage. People like to make fun of her but I doubt most people would be able to give a better response.

I'm not sure what you guys heard but I heard her tell Rand, in that weird passive/aggressive way that he needs to stay in the Senate. The only good thing about that statement was the single cheer for Rand and the perception that Rand is doing better in Iowa than the world is letting on.
Trump/Paul ticket???? No freaking way.

I'm not sure what you guys heard but I heard her tell Rand, in that weird passive/aggressive way that he needs to stay in the Senate. The only good thing about that statement was the single cheer for Rand and the perception that Rand is doing better in Iowa than the world is letting on.
Trump/Paul ticket???? No freaking way.

That's exactly what I got out of it. Nevertheless, the content of her speech won't matter. It's helpful because it legitimizes Rand. People don't really think very deeply. Rand was mentioned in a superficially positive light, and at the end of the day that's really all that maters.

I'm not sure what you guys heard but I heard her tell Rand, in that weird passive/aggressive way that he needs to stay in the Senate. The only good thing about that statement was the single cheer for Rand and the perception that Rand is doing better in Iowa than the world is letting on.
Trump/Paul ticket???? No freaking way.

I didn't watch the vid. Did she single out Rand alone or praise all the other candidates?

She basically said lesser men with no chance must stay in the senate to help the great Donald get $#@! done. Then right after she mentioned Rand, which I interpreted to mean one of the people that should keep their senate seat to help King Trump.

I didn't watch the vid. Did she single out Rand alone or praise all the other candidates?

She singled him out while she was talking about the three senators that needed to stay and keep fighting in the Senate. She started the "praise" with "and one of those Senators, Rand Paul". Or something to that effect.

It's unusual..like when she starts talking about Rand, she never really finishes the thought but if you slow it down it does make some kind of sense...in her head, at least. I can follow it, but it just goes off onto another thought without definitely finishing what she was saying...inarticulate....

yeah i agree.. and thats basically sara palin.. thats who she is and thats what you want from somebody all their personal nuances as they are what influence people.. anyway it wasnt a bad thing she mentioned rand.. if she had mentioned Cruz instead of Rand everybody here would be bitching....

She singled him out while she was talking about the three senators that needed to stay and keep fighting in the Senate. She started the "praise" with "and one of those Senators, Rand Paul". Or something to that effect.

Oh ok thx. That sounds like her saying Rand, Cruz, Rubio should drop Pres bids and go back to Senate. Naaa, I don't think so Sarah. Rand is the biggest threat to win Iowa over Trump...

"Let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

The entire internet is the domain of paid shills and bots. If you don't know this by now....

Israel, under control of the Crown and, ultimately, the Vatican, own the USA. If you don't know this by now....

Talk to people about liberty. You won't find it on websites, you won't find it in politicians.