PayPal

Wednesday, March 29, 2017

It is with pleasure that I publish another guest column
by Olivia Pierson of New Zealand.I have
retainedthe original spellings and
syntaxin her column. The illustrations and
extra links are my contributions. Please do visither blogsite, and Solo.

A few years ago, when
my 90 year old grandmother was still alive, I told her to make sure she kept
her ground floor windows shut to discourage any intruders so that she wouldn’t
get raped. “Pfft!” she sniffed, then smiled. “Chance would be a fine thing!”Did she want to be
raped?

Of course not, it’s
called a sense of humour. Sadly, the peecee social engineers don’t have one,
and listening to them try to engineer a public perception of a rape culture
defining New Zealand is just tedious – and dangerous.

It’s particularly
dangerous to men and boys.

I will say right at
the outset of this piece that in my eyes rape is a heinous, brutal crime. If
any male raped one of my loved ones, male or female, I’d want to kill them with
anything I could get my hands on, and probably would. There are no excuses for
that evil deed (though if some little hussy pulled her panties down in front of
a horny man and bent over the table saying “comeon” – followed by, “no, just
kidding,” I would probably consider it a mitigating circumstance).

In the aftermath of a
couple of Wellington boys making the statement on social media: “If you don’t
take advantage of a drunk girl, you are not a Wellington College boy,”
precipitating a much media-hyped protest, I think those comments can be safely
relegated to the world of edgy humour - much like my grandmother’s comment.

No rape was
committed, no young girl’s life was ruined and I certainly hope the young lads
who have been humiliated also have not had their youth spoiled.

Nicola Gavy: Academic
enemy

of embedded
reason and normalcy and the Self,

one of countless foot
soldiers prepared

to subvert your
child’s mind

Some University of
Auckland psychology professor named Nicola Gavey drew
some typically ridiculous long bows from this incident. In a recent NZ
Herald article, she was quoted as saying this: “The thing with rape
culture, is that it is embedded. We are socially training young people by
setting up a gender hierarchy where, put simply, men are on top and women are
on the bottom. We don't examine this and we don't think about the ways we are
creating it right from kindergarten."

Ladies and gentlemen,
feminist professors like Nicola Gavey are the reason why your lovely daughter went
into a New Zealand university a normal, good-natured girl but came out an
angry, complaining little minx with blue hair and a boulder on her shoulder.
Gavey believes “our everyday behaviour creates a culture where acts of male
aggression and entitlement are normalised to such an extent that it's easier to
cross the line.”

Apparently in NZ,
from kindergarten, the royal ‘we’ are all training our sons to act entitled,
aggressive and superior to women. This is embedding a culture of rape in our
children’s future. Ye gods, this is the stinking poop they are teaching at our
universities. Is there any difference between these statements and the “all men
are rapists” attitudes of Marilyn French styled feminism?

I’ll tell you what
aggressive entitlement looks like... girls like Emma
Sulkowicz. a.k.a “Mattress Girl” who probably went into Columbia University
a normal and good natured girl before Professors like Gavey got a hold of her
mind.

Emma accused a young
man and fellow student named Paul
Nungesser of raping her. Due to believing the feminist invented nonsense of
a university rape culture, Columbia University supported Miss. Sukowicz and
allowed her to carry a cumbersome mattress around with her every where she went
on campus, a performance art display to protest “carrying the weight’ of being
raped by a lad who was not automatically expelled. She claimed that Nungesser
had anally raped her, violently choked her and smacked her about the head. News
media, social media and every other form of media under the sun obsessed about
this story.

Nungesser, who always
protested his innocence, had to complete his college degree under the intense
scrutiny of the university’s investigation into the case – with the whole of
America (and the world) watching and judging.

After opening a
second rape crisis centre, as well as forcing compulsory “sexual respect”
workshops on all Columbia students, Columbia University found that Miss.
Sulkowicz made the whole thing up. She was not expelled. After being exonerated,
Nungesser brought a law suit against Columbia University for abetting Miss.
Sukowicz in her highly dramatic and internationally publicised lie, which
frankly ruined his life at college. He did not win.

This case is not
isolated, a whole slew of university rape accusations erupted around this time,
remember the Rolling Stone article “A Rape on Campus”? It falsely reported a
gang rape at the University of Virginia, claiming they were all in the thrall
of a burgeoning rape culture. These assertions are the handiwork of gender
obsessed feminists, for whom - and I’ll never know why, men represent some
insidious, ever present threat.

There is no rape
culture in NZ outside of gangland. That is not to say that boys and girls do
not get raped, they do (and it makes me utterly sick that some bastards get
away with it).

What does exist
ubiquitously in the lives of our young people though (and it is not anything
new) is a revoltingly cheap “hook up” culture, often accompanied by drugs,
booze and oversexed baseness (these are the grandchildren of the Baby Boomer
generation after all). The sex at least is mostly consensual, but an accusation
of rape can follow from a girl who feels sexually used, or taken for granted,
and who seeks to inflict some measure of vengeance (like in the case of
Mattress Girl). By the time some of these girls even get to the tender age of
twenty they’ve been on a hook up carousel of being screwed and dumped, screwed
and dumped more times than the number of years they’ve been alive.

If the adult
generation want to get to insightful discussions with young people about sex
culture, they would be better off guiding them to develop a strong, authentic,
tenacious Self to combat the pervasive pressure of constantly “appearing cool”
- or worse - “pleasing,” in the eyes of their peers. Romantic love can be a
minefield to navigate even as an adult, let alone a young person. What business
ought teenagers to have with sharing themselves physically and intimately with
another person when they are yet to develop a defined individual Self to share?

I just got tapped on
the shoulder by the ghost of my dear grandmother – she just threw open the
ground floor windows of her mansion in heaven before heading off to bed and
she’s calling me old fashioned. (Just kidding... there’s no way she would’ve
made it to heaven.)

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

It is with pleasure that I publish here another guest
column by Olivia Pierson.I have
retainedthe original spellings and
syntaxin her column. The illustrations and
extra links are my contributions. Please do visither blogsite, and Solo.

The beautiful Somali
born ex Muslim, ex right-wing-Dutch-politician-come-American, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, is
coming to speak to Australians and New Zealanders.

Being a much ruder culture than
we Kiwis, Ozzies have already started to protest Hirsi Ali’s arrival using
Australian Muslim women academics, business owners (and of course Diversity
Peddlers) as spokeswomen. They even have a little on-line petition. You can read it here.

The message of this petition is
laughable. Its dishonesty and hypocrisy are so palpably “on the page” I almost
cringed on their behalf. The powerful Hirsi Ali is just so intellectually
superior to these women that I don’t think she has anything much to worry about
– except for the usual death threats, but then, as an ex Muslim female with a
very persuasive voice, she’s used to those.

The group claim that their
disappointment in having Hirsi Ali come to speak in Australia is “reflective
of the huge diversity of opinion amongst Australian Muslim women. Although we
are not a homogenous group, we are united in our condemnation of Hirsi-Ali's
discourse which is grounded in hate-mongering and bigotry.”

The petition has 348 signatories
so far - in a country of 23 million people where about half a million identify
as Muslim, they can’t even rustle up 0.1% from their “huge diversity of opinion
amongst Australian Muslim women.” Not that I'm complaining.

Really Lovees, just go home and
be quiet. Hirsi Ali is coming and she is going to blow your backward religion
verbally to kingdom-not-coming-for-you. The most enjoyable part is that she
will do this as she always does, eloquently, prettily, cleverly, without ever
raising her beautiful, sonorous voice. She will crisply slice your 7th Century
superstition to pieces – just as her Muslim family members once held her down
and sliced off her genitals with scissors and no anaesthetic.

Like all Muslim-flavoured
protestors, this group are supremely anti the great Western value of
free-speech - unheard of in their own (or their parents') countries of origin.
This value is the only reason that these autocratic little Jezebels are allowed
to speak. The petition states:

“Hirsi-Ali’s sheer presence in Australia undermines
both intra and inter-community efforts toward social cohesion and in providing
platforms for Muslim women to champion their own causes.”

Take a note of that (within all
the intra, inter, social cohesion, platform weasel wordery) - they view Hirsi
Ali's “sheer presence in Australia” as a threat. Never mind that we have to
breathe the very same planetary air as the likes of these sneaky vixens, who
want the benefits of our cultural gifts, like capitalism & freedom, yet seek
to culturally destroy our values as they set about thriving off them.

Not on my watch – nor Hirsi Ali’s
obviously. And why do Muslim women need to champion their own causes in Western
lands – the lands of freedom and tolerance? In this multicultural day and age,
who stops them from doing anything they want to do? Nobody. Only their
co-religionists would aggress them enough to warrant this nonsense about
“championing their own causes.” They are pointing their irrelevant fingers at
fake oppressors. It is either a twisted psychological projection inflicted via
Stockholm Syndrome, or it’s a blatant deception.

Whenever Muslim activists start
this kind of chatter the term 'Islamophobia' will always be bandied about. Frankly,
an overwhelming proportion of Muslims are Infidelphobes and it's about time
they are called on it. Hirsi Ali is a very high-profile victim of their
Infidelphobia. The undersigned women of the petition have put their names to
sloppy sentiments like this:

“Hirsi-Ali stated recently, 'Violence is inherent in
Islam – it’s a destructive, nihilistic cult of death. It legitimates murder.'
This is just one example of the vitriol frequently espoused by this individual.
Against a backdrop of increasing global Islamophobia, Hirsi-Ali's divisive
rhetoric simply serves to increase hostility and hatred towards Muslims.”

How many news items recently have
you seen or read where Westerners are slaying Muslims as they innocently go
about their daily business? About two in ten years – one in Norway, one in Canada.

How many news items recently have
you seen or read where Muslims are slaying Westerners as they innocently go
about their daily business? What’s that? .. you’ve lost count? Exactly. Hapless
harpies such as these women are trying to flip the facts because they know
Hirsi Ali is right. They do lend their heartfelt endorsement to a violent,
nihilistic, destructive, murderous cult of death and slavery.

For those who like to buy the
ludicrous idea that these evils have nothing to do with Islam, read the Koran
and Hadiths
(the biographies about Mohammad founding their religion), then read the history
of the Ottomon Empire and the fall of Constantinople. Better yet, read the conquest of Hindu/Buddhist India by
Islam - 400 years of genocide, rape and slavery - exactly what
we have seen been dished out by ISIS & Al Qaeda.

This is not the religion being
hijacked by a few bad eggs, it is the religion itself as set forth by its
prophet Mo. Behold what a brutal 7th Century religion looks like in the 21st
Century when it has failed to undergo a Reformation encouraged by a
Renaissance.

Islamic violence and terror in
Western Democracies has grown meteorically in the last 20 years precisely
because Islamophobia is not in play. Political correctness has demanded that
everybody fawn over this Iron Age theocracy pretending it’s “the religion of
peace” – oh God! How’s that for trying to pull a fast one?! There’s more deceit
going on here than a Hillary Clinton charity event – one asks how do these
people get away with such boldface perfidy?

These mendacious women end their
petitioning words with “Australia deserves better than this.”

Au contraire! Australia and New
Zealand are damn lucky to be hosting a speaker as poignant on the world stage
as Ayaan Hirsi Ali happens to be. She has fought tirelessly and bravely for
years to expose the creeping evils which Islamic culture is importing into the
West, via the multiculturalist zealots. For all the years since the murder of
her friend and colleague, who was stabbed to death in a Dutch street, film
maker Theo Van Gogh, she has lived under a fatwa - violent fundamentalists
count it a duty to Allah to murder her, resulting in a full time security
detail. Why don’t the Westernised Muslima shriekers ever address this fact if
their religion is so unimpeachably peaceful?

Edward Cline, American Novelist

Edward Cline was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in 1946. After graduating from high school (in which he learned nothing of value) and a stint in the Air Force, he pursued his ambition to become a novelist. His first detective novel, First Prize, was published in 1988 by Mysterious Press/Warner Books, and his first suspense novel, Whisper the Guns, was published in 1992 by The Atlantean Press. First Prize was republished in 2009 by Perfect Crime. The Sparrowhawk series of novels set in England and Virginia in the pre-Revolutionary period has garnered critical acclaim (but not yet from the literary establishment) and universal appreciation from the reading public, including parents, teachers, students, scholars, and adult readers who believe that American history has been abandoned or is misrepresented by a government-dominated educational establishment. He is dedicated to Objectivism, Ayn Rand's philosophy of reason in all matters.