UK media coverup: “White power” supermarket attacker is Muslim, wrote “The wrath of Allah is about to come down upon the kaffir”

UPDATE June 25, 2015: Zak Ali has admitted to being a neo-Nazi white supremacist who was carrying out a “white power” attack.

—–

Last week, a young man named Zack Davies ran amok in a Tesco supermarket in north Wales. He attacked a Sikh, Sarandev Brahambra, with a hammer and a machete, leaving him with serious injuries. This story from the Mirror last week identifies the victim by name but describes him only as “Asian,” without ever saying he was Sikh, and also says: “The attacker was shouting ‘White power’, witnesses said, and detectives have confirmed the assault appeared to be racially-motivated.” So this was presented to the British public as a an attack by one of those right-wing racists that British authorities are much more concerned about than they are about Islamic jihadists, and this attack appeared to substantiate their concern.

There’s just one catch: Zack Davies is a Muslim who calls himself Zak Ali, and who warned on his Facebook page on the morning of his attack in Tesco: “The wrath of Allah is about to come down upon the kaffir, I will have my revenge.” He also posted four Qur’an verses (identifying the suras as “books”) that call for violence against unbelievers:

Book of Al-Anfal, verse 12 ( 8:12) – “I (Allah) will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off.”

5- Book of Al-Baqara, verse 191 (2:191) – “Kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from wherever they drove you out.”

6- Book of Al-Baqara, verse 193 (2:193) – “Fight them on until there is no more tumult and religion becomes that of Allah”

7- Book of Al-Tawba verse 29 (9:29) – “Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the last day… and fight People of the Book, (Christian and Jews) who do not accept the religion of truth (Islam) until they pay tribute (Jizyah tax) by hand, being inferior.”

The fact that Zak Ali is a Muslim who clearly believes in jihad against unbelievers doesn’t mean that this wasn’t a “white power” attack. As I have noted before, neo-Nazis have an affinity for Islam, based on their shared Jew-hatred. The British media, however, has not reported on the jihad aspect of this attack at all. Yet two reports strongly suggested that at least some British journalists know that the perpetrator was a Muslim, and are covering up that fact. The Mirror ran a photo of Zack Davies that appears on Zak Ali’s Facebook page — but it is remotely possible that they got it from somewhere else, and didn’t see Zak Ali’s page. Also, the Daily Post ran a story Monday with the headline, “Mold Tesco attack sparks fear in Sikhs across Wales.” Only Sikhs? But wasn’t this a “white power” attack against an “Asian,” which would mean that Muslims should be just as fearful as Sikhs? But neither this story nor any other says anything about Muslims being afraid after this “white power” assault on an “Asian” — a strong indication that the British media knows that the attacker was a Muslim, and are concealing this from the British public. “Community cohesion” must be preserved at all costs!

“Mold Tesco: First picture of Zack Davies accused of ‘racially-motivated’ attempted murder of shopper,” by Luke Traynor and Steve Bagnall, Mirror, January 16, 2015 (thanks to Clayton for this link and for alerting me to the attacker’s Facebook page and identity):

This is the first picture of a man accused of a racially-motivated attempt to kill an Asian customer who was shopping in a Tesco supermarket.

Shoppers fled for their lives when Zack Davies, 25, allegedly ran amok on Wednesday afternoon, armed with a machete and a hammer in Mold, north Wales.

Victim Sarandev Brahambra, 24, was left with ‘life-changing’ injuries after suffering deep cuts to the left hand, his back and the back of his head.

He was seen being wheeled out of Tesco by paramedics towards an ambulance with thick bandages wrapped around his skull.

The attacker was shouting ‘White power’, witnesses said, and detectives have confirmed the assault appeared to be racially-motivated.

Rich Fay, 20, said: “It was chaotic. The staff told everyone to get out of the store

“Everyone was bewildered, quite a few shoppers didn’t realise what was happening.”

Davies appeared before magistrates in Wrexham today where was charged with attempted murder.

He confirmed his name, address and date of birth before he was remanded in custody.

Wearing a grey top with short cropped hair, he was flanked by two security guards as he stood in the dock.

Comments

“As I have noted before, neo-Nazis have an affinity for Islam, based on their shared Jew-hatred.”

Based also on their color. (sarc/off)
Did you know that Muhammad was…WHITE?

“The Prophet passed through the lane of Khaibar quickly and my knee was touching the thigh of the Prophet . He uncovered his thigh and I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet.” (Bukhari 1.8.367)

Great news- now i can insult this asshole without being called racist.

The most funny thing maybe ,that black muslims who converted from christianity(because it’s according to them a white religion) to islam is now a jump from the frying pan into the fire converting to a religion that enslaved them(and castrated them all//death rate 80%)for 1400 years
was created by a white arab supremacist 🙂

(as i know at least two ,maybe three of the 4 califs had white skin either.Seems to me more like an arab clu clux clan-just less tolerant )

“Islam is the religion of peace.”
“Muslims are the best of people.”
“Muslim extremists are a very small minority”
“The sun sets in a muddy puddle in the West”
“The mountains are pegs that hold the land in place”
“Mohammed was white”

Yeah. After a bit, any statement made by a mohammedan (Bukhari in this case) starts to sound suspect. In this case Mohammed’s thigh probably looked white because of the dried semen left from his latest encounter with Aisha.

Actually, Bukhari was conscientious and honest. Christopher Hitchens wrote that of the 300,000 proposed hadiths that Bukhari had to evaluate for authenticity, Bukhari immediately rejected 200,000 of them as obviously worthless. In the end, Bukhari accepted only 20,000 of the remaining 100,000 as canonical.

Now, one is free to believe, as Muslims do, that Bukhari was 100% accurate, and that everything he rejected was chaff and that everything he accepted was all wheat. One can believe this, but it would be an unprovable and unfalsifiable belief. It would be nothing more than an act of faith.

To say Bukhari is inerrant would be an act of faith. To say Bukhari was a conscientious if biased collector of tradition is… pretty much what I’d say. I think Muslim bin al-Hajjaj the Nishapuri was better at it, myself, but that’s just me.

Both Muslim and Bukhari were men of old Central Asia. Both were probable racial Soghdians. Northern Iranians. THEY were white men, with a little Asian. I’ve seen photos of late 1800s Bukhara; many of those guys looked exactly like me. So maybe the hadiths which say Mo was white were part of the anti-Arab shu’ubiya. This movement was strongest in newly-Islamicised Persia, as part of the ‘Abbasid revolution.

Man, I am never going to win. I can literally count on one hand the few web sites that are functional with decent print functions. Unfortunately JW isn’t one of them.

Anyway…. ….regarding Bukhari:

Questions for Muslims 12-20-14

“What the horn is to the rhinoceros, what the sting is to the wasp, the Mohammedan faith is to the Arabs of the Sudan-a faculty of offence. All the warlike operations of Mohammedan peoples are characterised by fanatacism” Winston Churchill

“While Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Parsees and Jews, along with several million adherents of an animistic religion, all coexisted in relative harmony, one religion that would not accept compromise stood out from the rest: Islam.” Mahatma Gandhi

About three years ago I ordered some reading material, including Taha’s “Second Message”, and a “study” Koran to find out what this “Islam thing” was all about. When I was sixteen I was chanting nam yo ho renge kyo to a piece of paper, (gahonzen?), having NO idea what I was doing. A few years later, hair down to my ass and a knapsack on my back, I hitchhiked cross country, got saved in Nashville Tenn. and went to live on a Christian farm in Mansfield Ohio. (Not the prison.) My gra’mom called me a “seeker”. As I said, there came a time when I wanted to understand this “religion of peace”. It was Humaid’s article on jihad I found in my Summarized Bukhari that decided “things” for me.

“we may describe it, (jihad), as a surgeon’s lancet and not a butcher’s knife.” Mahmoud Mohammed Taha (I’m sure there are about 200 million dead people that would disagree with him. And this from the guy who’s been called the Mahatma Ghandi of Islam.)

Question for Muslims 12-20-14

Jihad in the Qur’an and Sunnah by ‘Abdullâh bin Muhammad bin Humaid (Isn’t that interesting: I had two links to this article that no longer work. In any case, Google it. It should be easy to find)

If Islam is the “religion of peace”, where in Sheikh Abdullah bin Humaid’s article on jihad can I find the equivalent of “Love Thy Neighbor” and “good will toward men”?

Explain its prominence, and significance almost as an “Introduction”, in a book, (my Summarized Sahih Al-Bukhari published by Dar-Us-Salam), that’s described as “the most authentic and true among the books of the Prophet”

Compare Humaid’s “jihad” and Emmet Fox’ Sermon on the Mount and tell me which one best represents a spirit of Love and “compassion” and tell me….

….Why, out of all the articles, out of all the words of pearly Muslim wisdom they could have put in this, “the most authentic and true among the books of the Prophet”, this is the one they chose to submit and use almost as an Introduction?

Also address “jihad” as it’s defined in Reliance of the Traveller and answer the same question. (Chapter O-9.0: Jihad O: “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion.” And explain why the “greater” jihad is only mentioned once here and never seen again in this “Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law”.)

I’ve posted this many times to many Muslims and have yet to get a single response. Well, I did receive a response from some goofball named “Dr.” Mohsen El-Guindy asking me to read his books. Instead I downloaded a bunch of his articles. Which were pure rants. An Imam, sidestepped it by telling me I had to “study Islam” to gain a greater understanding.

Question #3 for Our Muslim Friends: Why does Islam still practice slavery? (Jacob Prasch-You Tube video)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhoXKg3dLK0
If you want a “supplement” to this video get Slavery, Terrorism and Islam by Peter Hammond. An /\ss Kicker. It utterly destroys Islam.

Question #4 for Our Muslim Friends: Why does your holy book say the mother of Jesus and the sister of Moses are the same person? (Jacob Prasch-You Tube video) Hammond’s book answers this as well.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1DT7Dqss5k

Question #5 for Our Muslim Friends: Why has Islam never been able to deliver on the promise of ummah? The better question would be when he askes why is it that Democracies don’t fight each other yet Muslims slaughter other Muslims? (Jacob Prasch-You Tube video)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jQARbiVp-g

The Cliff Notes version of Islam 101 is this:

1. According to the Prophet Muhammad, the Quran represents the exact words of Allah as told to Muhammad by the Angel Gabriel. As such, no man can interpret what Allah has revealed (although at least 20% of the Quran makes no sense to scholars).
2. Any Muslim failing to believe what is written in the Quran and to comply with its teachings is an apostate-the punishment for which is death. Thus, the allegiance of all Muslims is to Allah and Muhammad’s teachings.
3. The Quran sanctions violence in order to impose Islam upon all non-Muslims. Such violence is detailed by Muhammad in the Quran, who even boasts therein about beheading hundreds of Jews who had voluntarily surrendered.
4. Every Muslim’s purpose in life is to work toward a global caliphate in which Islam reigns supreme-again using force where necessary.

Africans call Arabs always white!Also the gypsies in east europe call us only whites(ok thats true but thats there name for us.So the”whites” call them blacks-and if you read the news the newspaper write it as it was racist-but thats are the names for hundred of years.)
There is also something written in the Quran like-The good-the white i throb about my right shoulder and this became the whites….the bad the black i thro about my left shoulder..that became the blacks–this is also in islam to say tjats slavery is ok!

Obama, and now French politicians, are pushing the idea that the Mohammedans are doing terrorism because they are not fully integrated into French, or English, or pick your society and more should be done to ensure it happens. Yet, we regularly see native converts to Mohammedanism doing the same acts as their coreligionists. Should we therefore conclude that attempts at integration or assimilation are not going to work? Aren’t natives by definition already integrated in their own society?

The affinity between Nazism and Islam is a huge clue to the errant strain of psychopathology that has afflicted the world for centuries and now is festering again.

The second clue to the true nature of Islam is it’s attractiveness to convicted criminals. A society that recognizes this should never allow the preaching of Islam within it’s prisons or the granting of any special privileges to Muslim prisoners. But we do and thus the problem grows, even attracting more converts due to those extra privileges.

Yesterday on Breitbart I saw an article about a big explosion at a PEGIDA rally in Leipzig, Germany. Not a peep about it today and as far as I can tell the article from yesterday has been taken down. Was it a sham?

Per this article, the left just keeps digging the grave for western society. They won’t learn until the knife is at their throats.

I love my life. I live free in America. I may go to the Ocean and enjoy waves crashing one the shore. I may go to the hills, and climb a Mountain in the Adirondacks. We The People are Human. We have
FREEDOM TO DECIDE FOR OURSELVES. there is NO NEED TO DISRESPECT THE MUSLIM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLESSED as we are BYTHAT IS MEAN/CONDESENDING/CONTROLLING/EVIL. THEY HAVE ENOUGH ON THEIR P LATES. While FREEDOM Is nonexistent with the evil extremist. They have so much stress to even be able to make the a smile of peace.

I love my life. I live free in America. I may go to the Ocean and enjoy waves crashing one the shore. I may go to the hills, and climb a Mountain in the Adirondacks. We The People are Human. We have
FREEDOM TO DECIDE FOR OURSELVES. there is NO NEED TO DISRESPECT THE MUSLIM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLESSED as we are BYTHAT IS MEAN/CONDESENDING/CONTROLLING/EVIL.
……………………………………….

Muslims are instructed to believe just what this Jihad attacker believed and acted upon.

The only reason you live free in America is because the Muslim population here is under 1%—and even here, we are increasingly subject to Jihad terror attacks.

And the Muslim population is much higher in Britain, where pious Muslims are far more apt to launch violent Jihad attacks, as in the story here.

And yet, Breezer would have us believe that it is “disrespectful” to point out the dangers of violent Islam.

More:

THEY HAVE ENOUGH ON THEIR P LATES.
……………………………………….

Perhaps they should take this up with their violent corelgionists, and not with concerned Infidels.

More:

While FREEDOM Is nonexistent with the evil extremist. They have so much stress to even be able to make the a smile of peace.
……………………………………….

They don’t “have stress”—instead, they are following the diktats of their vicious creed.

Other people have to deal with stress—they seldom respond to it by violently attacking people of other faiths.

And the reason freedom is nonexistent is Islam is not due to “stress”, but to the fact that freedom is deemed un-Islamic.

Impossible to know whether Breezer is some sort of incredible naïf, or if he is instead a calculating Taqiyya artist. Ultimately, it may hardly matter.

As I have stated elsewhwere, we will battling our own as well as against Muslims who are trying to impose Islam on us.

During the Revolutionary War, American Colonists who supported the Revolution were a small number, about 5 – 12% of the total population of the Colonies. It was this small number who fought and won our freedoms. They still had to contend with British Loyalists who were approximately 50% or greater the number of Colonists that were against the Revolution and were content to follow whatever UK did. In other words, not only did the Revolutionists have to watch their backs with the British, they also had to watch out for their fellow Revolutionists.

It is possible that the supermarket customers of Mold be not that well acquainted with cries of Islamic supremacism. The “-u Akbar” part of “Allahu Ackbar” can sound a little like “”White Power”: in a situation of great stress an shock the brain can supply a meaning.

Heinrich Himmler, of course, was able to recruit an entire division of white Muslims for his Waffen-SS in Yugoslavia during Big Two. This was the 13th Mountain (Handschar) Division, whose slogan was “Handžaru udaraj!” (Handschar — strike!)

Composed of Bosnian Muslims (ethnic Bosniaks) with SOME Catholic Croat soldiers and mostly German and Yugoslav Volksdeutsche (ethnic German) OFFICERS and NCOs,

On 6 December 1942, Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler and key Waffen-SS recruiting officer SS-Obergruppenführer und General der Waffen-SS[a] Gottlob Berger approached Hitler with the proposal to raise a Bosnian Muslim SS division. Both the Wehrmacht and the Waffen-SS were concerned about the rapidly deteriorating security situation in the NDH that tied down German military personnel needed elsewhere.[6]

The romantic notions that Himmler had about the Bosnian Muslims were probably significant in the division’s genesis.[11] He was personally fascinated by the Islamic faith and believed that Islam created fearless soldiers.[9] He found their ferocity preferable to the gentility of Christians and believed their martial qualities should be further developed and put to use.[11] He thought that Muslim men would make perfect SS soldiers as Islam “promises them Heaven if they fight and are killed in action.”[12] As for their ethnic background and SS requirements, it appears that Himmler accepted the theories advanced by both Croatian and German nationalists that the Croatian people, including the Muslims, were not ethnic Slavs but pure Aryans of either Gothic or Iranian descent.[9][13]

”But neither this story nor any other says anything about Muslims being afraid after this “white power” assault on an “Asian” — a strong indication that the British media knows that the attacker was a Muslim, and are concealing this from the British public. “Community cohesion” must be preserved at all costs!”

In my opinion, this has nothing to do with ‘community cohesion’, neither is it really an attempt to conceal from the public the attacker was a mohammedan.

This is nothing more than a cynical, gross, and blatant attempt to persuade people that we have nothing to fear **specifically** from mohammedans. That in fact, as we are constantly being told by various talking heads, government ‘leaders’, and lying, compromised and biased journalists, ‘islamist’ terrorism is just one facet of a whole conglomerate of global terrorism, which would include terrorism perpetrated by anyone, other than mohammedans.

Who these perpetrators of terrorism, who are *not* mohammedans, is of course, not something they will come out and state, except in this instance, the attempt to slyly suggest we shouldn’t be afraid of mohammedan terrorists, because, hey, there’s some **white supremacists** out there !

The blatant cynicism, and even more blatant assumption, that we are all fools who will dance to their hands on the strings, makes me **vomit**.

I have a feeling this fellow is a convert, since
1) he referred to anfal , taubah and baquari as “books”
2) which probably means he knows no arabic
3) which probably means that one can become a tad extremist by reading the english translation too

Cheers Londonistan, There’s your wonderful english language at the service of those that which to “subjugate” you into a wonderful “Peace”
Also his mosque probably has more fun news in there.
Also the fact that he attacked a sikh refers to the deep ingrained hatred of the polythiests, which means
1) Islamists don’t believe in multiculturalism

Sikhs are the defenders of Dharma, perhaps they’r stirring for their own demise by attacking them.(they’ve had good practice)

Hope the Sikh guy recovers, they are a proud and noble people and the ones I’ve met are friendly and respectful of other religions. I’m not surprised about the journos lying an order was sent out from the Labour party and their affiliates the NUJ that all facts harmful to Islam should be covered up.

I’d like to know why the obsession with supporting Israel – don’t you know your history? In 1948 Zionist terrorists blew up a hotel and killed 91 British soldiers. And they weren’t the only British squaddies to die at the hands of Zionists and yet all this support – treasonable imo.

“Obsession”, eh? Why do you consider it an “obsession”? Personally, I support Israel because it’s a sliver of Western values in the midst of theocratic hellholes.

“don’t you know your history? In 1948 Zionist terrorists blew up a hotel and killed 91 British soldiers.”

Was it the same Zionists who formed the Jewish legion who fought alongside the British in WWI? In any case, I’m certain that more British soldiers were killed by Germans during WWI and WWII – should the British nowadays repudiate Germany because of it? You know what? Let’s go with your logic: British shouldn’t support Israel because Zionist terrorists killed 91 British soldiers. OK then, how many British citizens were killed and/or taken as slaves by the ottoman empire? You know, the imperialist, colonialist, genocidal nation that was broken down to Iran, Iraq, Jordain, etc? Should the British also stand against any nation that sometime during their history were a part of the ottoman empire?

“And they weren’t the only British squaddies to die at the hands of Zionists and yet all this support – treasonable imo”

I think you need to learn about the British mandate for Israel, what the British did and how the territory distributed – no wonder Zionists were pissed at the British. And once again, is support of Germany treacherous? The British fougth them in WWI and WWII. And what bout support of any nation that spawned from the ottoman empire? Is it treasonable as well?

There is a new “buzz phrase” used by non-muslims to describe another non-muslims actions. It is slightly insulting but humorous. The phrase; What are you/ya, muslim? The term describes a person that is intolerant, easily offended, violent, stifles speech of others that they don’t want to hear, self righteous, superior attitude, whiner/complainer/want it their way/ play victim card, dress with no style or any other deviation from the norm.

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Robert Spencer’s Free Speech Book

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.