Correct, Frank.
I'm the same size in the 202, 888 and 82 as long as they're the same width. Dunno about the 64 though but I'd imagine it to be the same size too.
My EG's are also all half a size larger than my crocketts.

Ha - Give some time for us to answer. I am going to need a resole soon and I actually talked with Steven at Leffot about this a few months ago. He was more than willing to help out and facilitate the communication and sending the shoes to EG when the time comes. I don't think that was only due to the fact that I have purchased 10-12 pairs from him - I think he would do this for anyone.

Based on pure conjecture he might do this for free (not adding anything to what EG charges) if you originally purchased the shoes through him. I would not hesitate to ask him.

I got the same impression from him, just wanted to make sure I wasn't being an undue burden, and was also hoping for color on turn-around time. I'll bring it up again when my latest order arrives at Leffot.

Correct, Frank.
I'm the same size in the 202, 888 and 82 as long as they're the same width. Dunno about the 64 though but I'd imagine it to be the same size too.
My EG's are also all half a size larger than my crocketts.

I am Alden Barrie US9D and EG 202 UK9D or UK9E. EG's E width (standard/medium/normal width) is considered by many to be slightly wider than a typical US "D" width.

Thanks all for the reply, it is safe for me to half size size down on the EG 22 last Chelsea, despite the feedback from Edward of Manchester that I should choose full size down with F fit (instead of E). For some reason I would go with my gut feelings.

Thanks all for the reply, it is safe for me to half size size down on the EG 22 last Chelsea, despite the feedback from Edward of Manchester that I should choose full size down with F fit (instead of E). For some reason I would go with my gut feelings.

I had the same conundrum....8.5E or 8F. Was told expressly that there is no relation between the two...the F is for wide feet and is noticably wiiide...if you don't have wide feet they will look like balloons on your feet. Plus 202 last chelsea is a bit short in length to begin with. Going down one size will give you a shoe that is too short to fit into. But if youre feeling lucky roll the dice.

I had the same conundrum....8.5E or 8F. Was told expressly that there is no relation between the two...the F is for wide feet and is noticably wiiide...if you don't have wide feet they will look like balloons on your feet. Plus 202 last chelsea is a bit short in length to begin with. Going down one size will give you a shoe that is too short to fit into. But if youre feeling lucky roll the dice.

No. I am going to take UK7.5E (half size down from my US size) instead. By the way, what did you choose finally? 8.5E or 8F?

Thanks all for the reply, it is safe for me to half size size down on the EG 22 last Chelsea, despite the feedback from Edward of Manchester that I should choose full size down with F fit (instead of E). For some reason I would go with my gut feelings.