“Woah! It's like Spotify but for academic articles.”

Instant Access to Thousands of Journals for just $40/month

THOUGHTS ON INTRALINGUAL AND INTERLINGUAL PERINTEGRATION IN PRESENT-DAY RUSSIAN

JIRÁČEK, JIŘÍ
THOUGHTS ON INTRALINGUAL AND INTERLINGUAL PERINTEGRATION IN PRESENT-DAY RUSSIAN
JIBl JIRÄÖEK 0. 'Perintegration', 'reintegration' or 'metanalysis', R1 perintegracija, degljutinacija, metanaliz or pererazlozenie, F motanalyse, fausse coupure, G Metanalyse, Deglutination, Abtrennung, Additionsbildung, falsche Ablösung, S falso analisis (cf. AXMANOVA 1966, 319) äs a rule means a secondary analysis of the morphemic structure of a word allowing its reinterprfctation äs a result of its additional motivation. (See Dict. of Slavonic Ling. Terminology -- DSLT). It may, however, also mean a secondary arrangement of the morphemic structure of a word äs a result of the development of language causing a transfer of the morphemic boundary and in consequence another segmentation. 1. INTRALINGUAL PERINTEGRATION 1.1. The result of the transfer of the morphemic boundary may be a split of the originally single morpheme into two morphemes, äs shown by the following example: adjectives of the type vozatyj (guide) originally contained the suffix -ataj (and were declined like samuraj). Their traiisition to an adjectival decünation brought about the change -aj > -yj and the function of a word-formative suffix came to be performed only by the sound complex -at-. In other cases, on the other hand, two or more morphemes could fuse into a single morpheme, e.g. the prefixes o- and bez-
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pngFolia Linguisticade Gruyterhttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/de-gruyter/thoughts-on-intralingual-and-interlingual-perintegration-in-present-gOvlFoC1af