thetrizinator

JJJSchmidt wrote:LIKE I SAID, the attached image isn't the best portrayal of THAT hunter. In the movie, he IS NOT svelt, he DOES wear a cap, etc.
Um, as far as insulting the movie, it's kinda ironic that you would defend this generic image and insult a generic movie. That's like saying my chocolatey silk dragon shirt is better than your chocolatey silk drgaon shirt... On another similarity note; one of the main resolutions in the movie IS about sasquatch!

http://www.rwrinnovations.com/images/antlers_away.jpg

Oops, better get after this artist too JJJSchmidt! looks like he was copying open season! just look at the jacket, the hat and the gun he's got it all!

JJJSchmidt

Oops, better get after this artist! looks like he was copying open season too. just look at the jacket, the hat and the gun he's got it all!

HAHAHA, that's not even close. I hope you're being sarcastic. I showed a co-worker, I just said it reminded me of a movie. The first thing out of his mouth was that one with the bear and the deer.
I wish ANYONE, who has actually seen that movie, RECENTLY, would speak up and at least throw me a bone. I'm not wrong, here. This is far more than a coincidence.
Oh, I get it, you all know this artist and either are huge fans or something! You won't say anything bad... Is that what it is, in order to do well, you have to kiss and handfull of buts; and NEVER rock the boat.
WOW, I thought high school was over. I always hated the masses that would defend the popular kids at all cost. Don't dare make fun of the quaterback!!!

mjc613

BoredStiff wrote:Love the concept and the look on the monster's face. I do wish that the colors were reversed, and the boy was in orange and the monster blended in with the shirt color...it works better for me if your eye gravitates to the boy first, then the beast, as is the case with your thumbnail.

Still, GMV.

I think it would not show up on the shirt if the colors were reversed. Pandora's Box from a couple of weeks ago came is a sad example of using colors too close to the shirt color in your design.

mrwednesday

JJJSchmidt wrote:HAHAHA, that's not even close. I hope you're being sarcastic. I showed a co-worker, I just said it reminded me of a movie. The first thing out of his mouth was that one with the bear and the deer.
I wish ANYONE, who has actually seen that movie, RECENTLY, would speak up and at least throw me a bone. I'm not wrong, here. This is far more than a coincidence.
Oh, I get it, you all know this artist and either are huge fans or something! You won't say anything bad... Is that what it is, in order to do well, you have to kiss and handfull of buts; and NEVER rock the boat.
WOW, I thought high school was over. I always hated the masses that would defend the popular kids at all cost. Don't dare make fun of the quaterback!!!

eHalcyon

JJJSchmidt wrote:HAHAHA, that's not even close. I hope you're being sarcastic. I showed a co-worker, I just said it reminded me of a movie. The first thing out of his mouth was that one with the bear and the deer.
I wish ANYONE, who has actually seen that movie, RECENTLY, would speak up and at least throw me a bone. I'm not wrong, here. This is far more than a coincidence.
Oh, I get it, you all know this artist and either are huge fans or something! You won't say anything bad... Is that what it is, in order to do well, you have to kiss and handfull of buts; and NEVER rock the boat.
WOW, I thought high school was over. I always hated the masses that would defend the popular kids at all cost. Don't dare make fun of the quaterback!!!

Wow, way to make assumptions. Why are you taking this so personally? People politely disagreed with you and you suddenly start flinging accusations?

Do the two characters look similar? Sure. Are they exactly the same? No. Was the character design stolen? Hey, anything is possible, but objectively speaking I'd say that it's unlikely. As others have pointed out, it's a pretty generic depiction of a redneck-hunter-woodsman guy. You may disagree, but maybe you just haven't been watching enough cartoons.

wootchawant

mjc613 wrote:The gray lines barely show up on my computer. They will not be visible at all on the shirt.

two comments:
1) the shades are purposely positioned to look just fine on women--they will hit well above the bust.
2) the almost invisible face is the whole point, and the .psd final print form has the lines just a bit lighter to ensure that they will be printable.

enjoy...

so wootchawootchawootchawant?! you're so funny with that money that you flaunt...

JJJSchmidt

eHalcyon wrote:Wow, way to make assumptions. Why are you taking this so personally? People politely disagreed with you and you suddenly start flinging accusations?

Do the two characters look similar? Sure. Are they exactly the same? No. Was the character design stolen? Hey, anything is possible, but objectively speaking I'd say that it's unlikely. As others have pointed out, it's a pretty generic depiction of a redneck-hunter-woodsman guy. You may disagree, but maybe you just haven't been watching enough cartoons.

Did you sign up for a new account JUST to bash this design?

E, I respect YOUR tone. My fur gets ruffled anytime someone blantantly denies the possiblity of a connection. When someone is that obstinent; I follow suit.
Tact and tone, these are things that I hold dear. My discussion did not begin with fury, but because I wasn't even getting a MAYBE out of Mr. I took that as a defense posture. As if they were defending for the sake of defense. If it is this person's work, then they can say, that was not the intent. If it is not their work, then they can at tleast say that I can see where you are comming from even if a disagree. I CAN RESPECT THAT...

I have purchased, but this isn't my real account, after this week I will not ever use it again. I used for the spirit of the theme, as I have seen others do.

I started this discussion because an earlier comment mentioned how familiar the hunter looked. All I got form Mr was NO. opinions are just that, don't shoot me down blatantly, or I will get angry. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE, between saying I don't agree and you are wrong.

Woot.com is operated by Woot Services LLC.
Products on Woot.com are sold by Woot, Inc., other than items on Wine.Woot which are sold by the seller specified on the product detail page.
Product narratives are for entertainment purposes and frequently employ
literary point of view;
the narratives do not express Woot's editorial opinion.
Aside from literary abuse, your use of this site also subjects you to Woot's
terms of use
and
privacy policy.
Woot may designate a user comment as a Quality Post, but that doesn't mean we agree with or guarantee anything said or linked to in that post.