You are here

Decadence theory and historical materialism

In the first
article in this series, published in International Review
n°118, we showed how the theory
of decadence is at the very heart of historical materialism in
Marx’ and Engels’ analysis of the evolution of modes of
production. It is central to the programmatic texts of the
organisations of the workers’ movement. In the second article,
which appeared in International Review n121,
we saw how the organisations of the workers’ movement from the time
of Marx, through the Second International and its marxist left to the
Communist International, made this analysis the foundation of their
understanding of the evolution of capitalism in order to be able to
determine the priorities for the period. In fact, Marx and Engels
always stated very clearly that the perspective of the communist
revolution depended on the objective, historical and global evolution
of capitalism. The Third International, in particular, made this
analysis the general framework for its understanding of the new
period that opened with the outbreak of World War I. All of the
political currents that formed the International, recognised that the
first global war marked the beginning of capitalism’s decadent
phase. We continue here our historical survey of the main expressions
of the workers’ movement by examining more closely the particular
political positions of the Communist International on the national,
parliamentary and union questions, for which the system’s entry
into its phase of decline had important implications.

In the
first article in this series, published in International Review
n118, we saw how the theory of
decadence is at the very heart of historical materialism, of Marx and
Engels’ analysis of the evolution of modes of production. Equally,
we find the same notion at the centre of the programmatic texts of
the organisations of the working class. Furthermore, not resting at
merely adopting this foundation-stone of marxism, some of these
organisations have developed the analysis and/or its political
implications. It’s from this dual point of view that we aim here to
briefly review the main political expressions of the workers’
movement. In this first part we will begin with the movement in the
days of Marx, the Second International, the marxist lefts which came
out of it, and the Communist International at the time it was formed.
In the second part, which will appear in a future issue, we will
examine more closely the analytical framework for the political
positions developed by the Third International and then by the left
fractions which emerged from it as it began to degenerate, and
from which we draw our political and organisational origins.

The decadence of capitalism is not the eternal repetition of its contradictions on a growing scale, but poses the question of its survival as a mode of production, according to the terms used by Marx and Engels. By rejecting the concept of decadence as defined by the founders of marxism and subsequently taken up by the organisations of the workers’ movement, some of whom deepened it further, Battaglia Comunista is turning its back on a historical materialist understanding.

In
the previous issue of the International Review (n°118),
we recalled at length, and with the support of passages from their
major writings, how Marx and Engels defined the notions of the
ascendance and decadence of a mode of production. We saw that the
notion of decadence lies at the very heart of historical
materialism in the analysis of the succession of different modes
of production. In a forthcoming article, we will also demonstrate
that this concept was central to the political programmes of the
2nd and 3rd Internationals, and of the
marxist left that emerged from them, in which the groups of the
Communist Left today have their origins.

We are beginning a new series devoted to the theory of
decadence.
For some time now, various criticisms of this concept have been
piling up. To a large extent they have been the work of academic
or parasitic grouplets. Others, however, express real
incomprehension inside the revolutionary milieu,
or come from searching elements who are posing genuine questions
about the evolution of capitalism on a historic scale. We have
already replied to the bulk of these criticisms.
Today, however, we are seeing a change in their nature. They are
no longer questions, misunderstandings or doubts; they no longer
simply put certain aspects into question. Rather, we are seeing a
total rejection, a type of criticism which amounts to an
excommunication from marxism.