headset outlowed for driving in california

Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) is the generated byproduct of electricity traveling through electronic devices. Electronic devices develop a field of radiation or, an Electromagnetic Field (EMF) that is strongest when closest to the source and reduces in intensity when moving away from the source. Increasing the current within the source will directly increase the strength of the field.

Industry experts recommend that exposure to these fields should be less than 2 milliGauss (mG), the measurement of EMFs. For devices such as laptops, these levels can reach up to 175 mG, when processing and computing.

EMF radiation can be dangerous because it can often change field direction, creating a vibration within the tissues of the body.

EMF Vibration Impacts

A vibrating Electromagnetic Field (EMF) touching the body generates heat and cell mutation. In fact, this phenomenon works the same way as a microwave by vibrating molecules together and generating enough heat to cook food. Long term exposure to EMF vibrations can lead to serious health concerns.

With increased temperatures, both male and female fertility can be affected. Studies over the past 20 years show that long-term exposure to high levels of EMFs can mutate cells, burn skin, cause DNA cellular breakdown and many other health problems including cancer.

Conclusion
Most EMFs are fields that vibrate the human body’s cells. This vibration can not only cause heating up of cells, but also manipulate the cells in other dangerous ways.

The medical journal Fertility and Sterility recently published a laptop radiation report on Argentinian scientists studying the relationship between laptop radiation, WiFi and human male sperm.

In their study, semen samples from 29 healthy men were placed under a laptop connected to an active internet session via WiFi.

Testing was conducted over a four hour period and produced the following results:
25% of the semen was no longer active compared to 14% from semen samples stored at the same temperature over the same time period and away from the computer.
9% of the sperm showed DNA damage, 3x the damage experienced by the comparison samples.
Based on the testing, these scientists concluded that WiFi or Radio Frequency (RF) radiation can be unhealthy to the human body.

Laptop Computers and WiFi Fertility Study Results
Conrado Avendano of Nascentis Medicina Reproductiva in Cordoba and his colleagues say “Our data suggest that the use of a laptop computer wirelessly connected to the internet and positioned near the male reproductive organs may decrease human sperm quality.” They go on further to say, “At present we do not know whether this effect is induced by all laptop computers connected by Wi-Fi to the internet or what use conditions heighten this effect.”

The Laptop Radiation WiFi Sperm Controversy
In previous studies, there was confirming evidence found. In a Reuters Health report November 5, 2010, a study revealed that radiation from cell phones creates feeble sperm in the lab. A urologist noted that a laptop balanced on his knees could crank up scrotum temperatures to unsafe levels. These were reports on higher frequency, Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR), Radio Frequency (RF) radiation similar to those by Conrado Avendano.

On the other hand, Dr. Robert Oates, president of the Society for Male Reproduction and Urology doesn’t believe laptops are a significant threat to male reproductive health. Referring to the Argentinian study he says, “This is not real-life biology, this is a completely artificial setting,” He goes on further to say, “It is scientifically interesting, but to me it doesn’t have any human biological relevance.” In fact, he says he has not seen any study to connect laptop radiation as influential on fertility or pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusion
There is still controversy on our understanding of Radio Frequency (RF) radiation being so close to our bodies. However, recent evidence continues to point to the danger of laptop use directly in our laps. Extremely powerful technologies such as those found in laptops, iPads and other electronic devices are now being used very close to our bodies. With time, RF radiating devices devices will be better understood. In the meantime, take precautions to protect yourself from the health dangers of laptop radiation.

Our environment poses heath threats from the very things that are supposed to make our lives easier. Electronic devices like laptop computers, cell phones, WiFi networks, microwave ovens, and even the power used by the wires in our walls and ceilings are so important in modern lives, yet their Electromagnetic Field (EMF) emissions can be harmful.

There is no consensus understanding about the human impact from our electronic devices. There are however experts on the subject. Dr. Neil Cherry was a leading researcher on EMF science before passing away in 2003. He challenged us to take responsibility for our health and better understand Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). The following were few of his thoughts.

Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) Effects on the Body

Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) has become a growing concern over the past 50 years because we have electronic devices that emit radiation getting closer and closer to our bodies. The scientific community knows that heath concerns are partly genetic, but also environmental. We know that food, water and air introduce toxins to the body, but we are now beginning to understand through growing evidence that Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) damages cells and can even cause cancer.

Dr. Neal Cherry investigated data on cell damage in controlled, repeatable laboratory studies. He pointed out that in one study, human breast cells exposed to Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) were affected. This exposure totally eliminated the effectiveness of melatonin, used to help us sleep. Exposure also caused long-term DNA damage and impaired body cells. The link between Electromagnetic Radiation with power lines and appliances was established as well, and the impact was a reduction of melatonin cleaning-up effect on human breast cancer cells.

Other studies showed people who work with Electromagnetic Fields are more likely to get breast cancer than those less exposed. Dr. Cherry noted a statistically significant increase in breast cancer among the people exposed.

The National Cancer Institute studied people exposed to work related microwaves. They concluded that there was a tenfold increase in brain tumors among those working 20 years or more. Dr. Cherry points out that the destructive source was Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR).

The University of Washington conducted research on microwave Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) impact on the brains of rats. The research showed breaks in the DNA associated with increased free radicals and increased cell deaths. This study emulates levels of exposure when using a cell phone against your head.

Dr. Cherry investigated other studies such as the one at the US Embassy in Moscow where the effect of radar signals, or Electromagnetic Radiation, on people was evaluated. The study demonstrated that there were changes in the blood and an increase in cancer from the radiation.

“Dr. Royal R. Rife found that every disease has a frequency. He has found that certain frequencies can prevent the development of disease and that others would destroy diseases. Substances of higher frequency will destroy diseases of lower frequency.”

“In 1992, Bruce Taino of Taino Technology, an independent division of Eastern State University in Cheny, Washington, built the first frequency monitor in the world. Taino has determined that the average frequency of a healthy human body during the daytime is 62 to 68 Hz. When the frequency drops, the immune system is compromised. If the frequency drops to 58 Hz, cold and flu symptoms appear; at 55 Hz, diseases like Candida take hold; at 52 Hz, Epstein Bar and at 42 Hz, Cancer. Taino’s machine was certified as 100 percent accurate and is currently being used in the agricultural field today.”

“The study of frequencies raises an important question concerning the frequencies of substances we eat, breathe, and absorb. Many pollutants have low frequencies and cause the bodies healthy frequencies to be lowered and weakened. Processed or canned food has a frequency of zero and tend to lower healthy frequencies within the body towards degenerative diseases. Fresh produce has up to 15 Hz; dry herbs from 12 to 22 Hz; and fresh herbs from 20 to 27 Hz. Essential oil frequencies start at 52 Hz and go as high as 320 Hz; which is the frequency of Rose Oil.

These higher frequencies create an environment in which disease, bacteria, virus, fungus, cancer, etc., CANNOT live.”…..“In one study the doctors took two young men who had a 66-hertz frequency. One held coffee and his frequency dropped to 58 in 3 seconds. The other gentleman drank it and his frequency dropped to 52 in 3 seconds.”

There are two reports of the effects of EMF on the blood globulin (16, 17). When rats were exposed to 3000 v/m at 1 KHz for 8 and 20 days (20 min./day), a reduction in coagulation activity (expressed as a lengthening of the rethrombin time, a drop in plasma tolerance for heparin, and a decrease in prothrombin consumption), and a rise in the thromboplastic and fibrinolytic activity of the blood were found (16). We found that rats exposed to DC electric fields of 2.8-19.7 kv/m had altered blood-protein distributions (17). The general trend was towards elevated albumin and decreased gamma globulin levels (expressed as a percent of the total blood proteins).

The results obtained in connection with the application of the electric field are shown in table 7.1. In each experiment, RBC on “day 5” was significantly less than on “day 3,” regardless of whether the interval between “day 3” and “day 5” was an exposure period or a nonexposure period. A decline in Hct paralleled the RBC changes, but Hb showed no consistent changes. MCV showed a tendency to decrease, but the other computed indices both increased, since the cell loss overshadowed any decrease in hemoglobin concentration. The trends in the computed indices, and especially the changes in RBC and Hct, were opposite to those induced by our method of blood collection alone. It follows, therefore, that the applied electric field had a physiological impact. The unique feature of the observed responses is that, for each parameter, a change in the same direction occurred with both the F-ðnF and nF-ðF groups. An analysis of variance confirmed that in all four experiments there was an effect associated with time but not with the order of field application. This indicated that the animals responded to the change in their electrical environment, not to the electric field itself.