Restaurants are going "hyperlocal" by growing food in restaurant gardens - some behind restaurants and others on the roof (we had one restaurant garden on our 2011 Annual City Farm and Garden Tour - 116 Crown in New Haven)

Do-it-yourself canning, pickling and preserving - learning how to preserve fresh food through the winter is a great way to keep your diet local year-round!

Do you have any 2012 New Year's Resolutions? The most common answers are some combination of "lose weight", "live more healthfully", "spend more time with friends and family"

I have some good news, all of these resolutions lend themselves to eating local and organic!

We like these resolutions, they can make you happier, healthier, and thinner (if you're concerned about that)

Eat in. I like this recommendation to lay off the take-out, and try making your own bread. If you're really inept at cooking, look for some cooking classes in your area, more restaurants are offering them as a way to bring customers into their kitchens!

Start a garden! It's not too hard (we're here to help!), you can save money on food, help the environment and you'll have a healthy food source in your yard!

Share your resolutions with other people, make sustainable dinners for your family and friends, bring them to the local farm where you buy your produce!

Buy a share in a CSA, contact farms now to see when you should buy your shares and to see if you can reserve one (some CSAs have already sold out their shares for 2012)

Here's to 2012!

Kristiane

And a happy, hearty, healthy New Year from all of us in the CT NOFA office.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

According to the USDA, the number of winter farmers markets in the country has increased by 38 percent since 2010, from 886 to 1,225 total markets nationwide. This means winter farmers markets account for 17 percent of the total number of markets, a promising and currently growing figure. The USDA believes that much of this growth can be traced to the adoption of hoop house technology by small farmers as a way to lengthen their growing season and continue to offer fresh fruits and vegetables into the winter.

Agriculture Deputy Secretary Kathleen Merrigan gives some encouragement to those who are considering offering produce into the winter months: “Consumers are looking for more ways to buy locally grown food
throughout the year. Through winter markets, American
farmers are able to meet this need and bring in additional income to
support their families and businesses.”

If you're thinking about starting a farmer's market and want to learn more about the support the USDA can provide you, check out the article here. If you're looking for a winter farmers market or CSA program near you (a great way to have delicious, healthy, local food year-round while supporting your local economy) or if you want to try out some new winter food recipes, check out our Winter Food Project webpage here.

The conclusion of the report states that:"Effects were mostly concentrated in kidney and liver function, the two
major diet detoxification organs, but in detail differed with each GM
type. In addition, some effects on heart, adrenal, spleen and blood
cells were also frequently noted. As there normally exists sex
differences in liver and kidney metabolism, the highly statistically
significant disturbances in the function of these organs, seen between
male and female rats, cannot be dismissed as biologically insignificant
as has been proposed by others. We therefore conclude that our data
strongly suggests that these GM maize varieties induce a state of
hepatorenal toxicity....These substances have never before been an
integral part of the human or animal diet and therefore their health
consequences for those who consume them, especially over long time
periods are currently unknown."

What it comes down to - is that it doesn't matter if GMOs are good or bad (though the health and environmental threats are daunting), the fact that scientists are questioning the safety of GMOs is enough. Until GMOs are deemed safe or not - we at least deserve the right to choose whether to risk it or not. In my search for images of GMO Protests, the first several photos were all from different countries. These global protests are not against scientific progress - they are against the "unknown" and the unanswered questions surrounding GMO food safety.

Bulgaria: http://lesconcepts.wordpress.com/tag/ichiro-sato/

South Korea:
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/include/print.asp?newsIdx=20476

Keep telling the Food and Drug Administration how you feel about GMOs by adding comments to legal petition
(Docket # FDA-2011-P-0723-0001/CP) calling on the FDA to label genetically
engineered (GE) food.

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

You
may have heard that Rep. Roy is planning to introduce legislation to
require the labeling of foods containing Genetically Modified Organisms
in the next session. He has bipartisan support.

This seems like something that you would be interested in and support.

CT
NOFA is supporting this effort, as is so far, The Ledgelight Health
district and the United Church of Christ. The CT League of Conservation
Voters will support it as soon as we have a bill to show them.

Most
polls (for over a decade or more) have shown that the vast majority of
people in this country also support labeling of foods containing GMOs.

This
could be very helpful to the local food movement in Connecticut, since
almost all local food (except meat and dairy products) doesn't involve
GMOs. The coming of GMO sweet corn next year opens up a big can of
worms.

It might also have a beneficial health
outcome since many junk foods contain GMOs, while fruits and vegetables,
whole grains and legumes don't.

If
successful this will be another in a long line of Connecticut's
significant environmental firsts. There is an Initiative in California
to do this too.

We are having a meeting in Hartford this Friday, at 10 in the LOB.
Bob Burns, who is a leader in this effort,
says that Rep. Roy is arranging a room. Senator Maynard has committed
to coming. Tom Reynolds will be there. Diana Urban supports this and
may be there. Edith Prague is 100% behind this effort but is recovering
from surgery.

It would be great if you could be at this meeting. Check with Rep. Roy's office rm.3201for exact location of the meeting.

If you can't attend, let us know if you are interested in supporting, or if you have any questions.

I'll
paste the language for the California initiative below, as well as some
questions about how it treats GMO feed, although I need to spend some
more time with the complicated language there to really understand what
it means.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Kraft Foods, the world's second largest food producer has released the results of a survey on the company's effect on climate, land and water including analysis of their agriduclutral production.

The first thing that surprised me about the articles about the findings, were the number of food brands that Kraft foods owns including, Cadbury, Maxwell House, Nabisco, Oero, Oscar Mayer, Philadelphia, Tang and Trident.

Also, Kraft has already put in place some efforts at being more sustainable and has set a number of ambitious goals to attain by 2015.

The survey was conducted in a partnership with Quantis, Inc., a company that specializes in Life Cycle Assessment. The World Wildlife Fund analyzed the results as part of its market transformation initiative.
'
Kraft found that nearly 60% of its carbon footprint is from farm commodities and 12% of the carbon footprint is from transportation and distribution of products. 80% of the land impact is from agriculture, and 70% of their water footprint is from growing raw materials.

The study confirms that Kraft's biggest environmental liability and potential leverage point for improvement is increasing the sustainability of its agricultural suppliers.

Krafts 2010 goals to be achieved by 2015 were to:

increase sustainable sourcing of agricultural commodities by 25%

reduce 50 million miles from its transportation network

The other five goals are related to manufacturing efficiency. With 60% of Kraft's carbon footprint coming from their agricultural sources, Kraft needs to pressure their agricultural suppliers to be more sustainable and shift more of their agricultural production to locations more local to manufacturing and distribution points. And consumers need to pressure them to do this too. Decentralized, local farm production is of course preferable, but large companies are going to continue to purchase food from the agricultural industry. This large industry can reorient itself to be more sustainable and local, it just requires some more thought, planning and oversight.

WWF has charged that supply chain work requires the formation of long-term partnerships based on the identification of shared objectives. Kraft's plans to make manufacturing more efficient are commendable, but they aren't changing the agricultural practices that have the greatest negative impact on the environment and our livelihoods.

There's been a lot of buzz lately about young people becoming increasingly interested in farming and specifically in organic production. Back on the 12th, NPR ran an article on it's food blog, The Salt, about a push among young people to abandon corporate life in favor of a more agrarian alternative. Disillusioned with stifling corporate values, and in response to an economy where the daily grind is less likely to yield positive results, thousands of people are returning to the land. Another recent article by MSNBC points out that, although farming is inherently risky and expensive getting started, agriculture has fared better than many other parts of the economy during the recession. Many young people see farming as a calculated risk; one that has a greater likelihood than an office job of working out to their advantage, whether the gains lay in profits or in emotional well-being. With more than 60% of current farmers over the age of 55, we need a new generation of young farmers to prevent reliance on an ever-decreasing number of producers.

If you are getting started as an organic farmer and need some help tackling big challenges like land access and marketing, register for our Getting Started in Organic Farming Conference to be held Saturday, January 28, 2012 at the CT Forest and Park Association in Rockfall, CT. Don't miss this opportunity to network with other new farmers and learn from the experts about how to be successful. You can learn more and register here. If you've been farming for less than 10 years you may qualify for a scholarship: find out here.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Our certificate from IFOAM welcoming the NOFA Standards in Organic Land Care to the IFOAM Family of Standards

The NOFA Organic Land Care Program, a regional project out of the Connecticut NOFA office, has been accrediting professionals for 10 years now. And we want to expand the organic land care movement to be bigger than ever in 2012. Organic should be the standard in landscaping.

This year our standards were accepted to the International Family of Standards established by the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements.

Our Accredited Organic Land Care Professionals (AOLCPs) : Have taken the NOFA OLC 5-day Accreditation Course in organic landscaping, passed the Accreditation Exam, pledged to provide organic land care according to the NOFA Standards for Organic Land Care, maintained continuing education by attending a minimum of 4 credit-hours of organic landscaping education annually and must pay an annual fee ($100) to support the work of the OLC program

Ask your town government or schools if any of their groundskeepers are accredited - it's state law that no pesticides can be used on k-8 schools, and towns are also implementing these bans on town lands.

Read about how a couple of our AOLCPs and committee-members, Camilla Worden of Brookfield, CT and Frank Crandall
are making their accreditation work for them. While you are helping
the environment and offering customer safer land management practices,
you can also really help your business.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Jim Riddle from the University of Minnesota has compiled a great presentation that's provided on UMN's Organic Ecology website. The presentation, titled Why Eat Organic, provides a wealth of information about why organic agriculture can feed the world, is necessary to mitigate the effects of climate change, and can undo a lot of the harm that conventional agriculture does to our bodies. Not only do organic foods contain far less pesticide residues than their conventional cousins, but organic foods also have higher levels of healthy nutrients. Children who go organic for just five days "can virtually eliminate exposures to a dangerous class of insecticides known to disrupt neurological development in infants and children." Additionally, many of the nutrients found in much higher levels in organic foods can greatly decrease your risk of heart disease, diabetes, and many cancers. Organic is not only the safe bet but the healthy bet, both for our bodies and for our planet.

Monday, December 19, 2011

Register today for our Getting Started in Organic Farming Conference to be held Saturday, January 28, 2012 at the CT Forests and Parks Association in Rockfall, CT! A new article by Grist shows that new farmers cite land access and funding as the major stumbling blocks against becoming established in the industry, but that apprenticeships, local partnerships, and CSAs represent areas of growth. Attending the conference will help beginning organic farmers become more familiar with available resources, both in areas of growth and in areas of need, and will help to give a well-rounded perspective through exposure to broad themes as well as technically specific topics. Click here to learn more and to register!

You can also get involved with your local congressperson to change the upcoming Farm Bill. The Bill process is now restarting, and Congress needs to be reminded why our nation needs a Farm Bill that is responsive to current changing agricultural needs. Tell your congressperson to sponsor the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Opportunity Act of 2011, which fixes, funds and improves USDA programs, as well as adds new programs to help young and beginning farmers succeed. The process of getting started as a farmer should be easier, and it can be easier, if we exercise our rights and let our voices be heard.

Friday, December 16, 2011

Comparison between government nutrition recommendations and federal agriculture subsidies in FoodTech Connect's entry in the Farm Bill Hackathon

The Farm Bill is a pretty dense document, with such complicated subsidy structures and a huge variety of programs, that it is a challenge for experts to follow and completely inaccessible to many of the people it effects the most: consumers and farmers. The 2008 Farm Bill is very difficult to read, as Marion Nestle points out in her column in The Atlantic even for experts, and the 2012 Farm Bill shapes agricultural policy for the next five years, which also determines what kind of food Americans will be eating for the next five years.

To break apart the Farm Bill to the essentials, GRACE Communications Foundation sponsored a "Hackathon" to bring together sustainable food advocates and computer programs to create infographics and online tools to communicate the important points of the Farm Bill, and what our country (and even the world) needs from the 2012 bill.

Teams created different tools and slideshows, as entries in the Hackathon, which was also a contest to create the best powerpoints.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

A new article by Care2 provides a concise and well-written outline of topics you can use in the event of a Genetically Modified Organism debate, courtesy of Jeffrey Smith, the Keynote speaker at our upcoming Winter Conference. Advocates for GMO use have a lot to say about why GMOs are great for humanity, but numerous studies argue otherwise. Here are some of the highlights:

1. GMOs are unhealthy.The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) urges
doctors to prescribe non-GMO diets for all patients. They cite animal
studies showing organ damage, gastrointestinal and immune system
disorders, accelerated aging, and infertility. Human studies show how
genetically modified (GM) food can leave material behind inside us,
possibly causing long-term problems. Genes inserted into GM soy, for
example, can transfer into the DNA of bacteria living inside us, and
that the toxic insecticide produced by GM corn was found in the blood of
pregnant women and their unborn fetuses.

3. GMOs increase herbicide use.
Most GM crops are engineered to be “herbicide tolerant”―they defy deadly
weed killer. Monsanto, for example, sells Roundup Ready crops, designed
to survive applications of their Roundup herbicide.
Between 1996 and 2008, US farmers sprayed an extra 383 million pounds
of herbicide on GMOs. Overuse of Roundup results in “superweeds,”
resistant to the herbicide. This is causing farmers to use even more
toxic herbicides every year. Not only does this create environmental
harm, GM foods contain higher residues of toxic herbicides. Roundup, for
example, is linked with sterility, hormone disruption, birth defects,
and cancer.

5. Government oversight is dangerously lax.
Most of the health and environmental risks of GMOs are ignored by
governments’ superficial regulations and safety assessments. The reason
for this tragedy is largely political. The US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), for example, doesn’t require a single safety
study, does not mandate labeling of GMOs, and allows companies to put
their GM foods onto the market without even notifying the agency. Their
justification was the claim that they had no information showing that GM
foods were substantially different. But this was a lie. Secret agency
memos made public by a lawsuit show that the overwhelming consensus even
among the FDA’s own scientists was that GMOs can create unpredictable,
hard-to-detect side effects. They urged long-term safety studies. But
the White House had instructed the FDA to promote biotechnology, and the
agency official in charge of policy was Michael Taylor, Monsanto’s
former attorney, later their vice president. He’s now the US Food Safety
Czar.

8. GMOs harm the environment.
GM crops and their associated herbicides can harm birds, insects,
amphibians, marine ecosystems, and soil organisms. They reduce
bio-diversity, pollute water resources, and are unsustainable. For
example, GM crops are eliminating habitat for monarch butterflies, whose
populations are down 50% in the US. Roundup herbicide has been shown to
cause birth defects in amphibians, embryonic deaths and endocrine
disruptions, and organ damage in animals even at very low doses. GM
canola has been found growing wild in North Dakota and California,
threatening to pass on its herbicide tolerant genes on to weeds.

9. GMOs do not increase yields, and work against feeding a hungry world.
Whereas sustainable non-GMO agricultural methods used in developing
countries have conclusively resulted in yield increases of 79% and
higher, GMOs do not, on average, increase yields at all. This was
evident in the Union of Concerned Scientists’ 2009 report Failure to
Yield―the definitive study to date on GM crops and yield.

And that's only half of the list! To read the full list, go here. If you want to hear Jeffrey Smith speak in person about the dangers of GMOs, register for our Winter Conference being held on March 3, 2012 in Manchester, CT. To learn more and to register, click here.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

In Shorewood, WI, Louise Quigley, who has been living in her home for over twenty years, is being taken to court over her native lawn. In an effort to deter schoolchildren from using her lawn as a shortcut coming home from school, she decided to plant prairie grasses, goldenrods, milkweed, and butterfly weeds, citing the ecological benefits of such a planting.

“They are less work, they come up every year, they are pretty," she says. "Native
perennials have all kinds of environment benefits because the native
plants feed the native bugs, feed the birds; it’s the bottom of the food
chain. You can promote the survival of our ecosystem and
our biosphere if you plant native plants.”

However, despite Louise's astute decision regarding local ecology, her prairie yard happens to violate an outdated neighborhood ordinance that her community has begun cracking down on. The ordinance states that native lawns can't exceed six inches in height, and when Louise refused to comply with the ordinance she was summoned to court. Louise has since been trying to push village officials to get the ordinance changed. She argues, "(The ordinance) is about lawns and it isn't about native plant
communities. It was drafted way back and wasn't about 21st
century aesthetics or a 21st century ecological understanding. I don't
have a lawn, I have a prairie. They are using a lawn regulation to
harass me about my prairie."

Monday, December 12, 2011

This winter we have a flurry of events that promise to be both exciting and educational. Read on to learn more:

Get ready for our upcoming NOFA chapter Winter Conferences! Six NOFA chapters are holding conferences between January and March with great speakers, workshops, and events for all. Visit the chapter websites to learn more and to register. If you've been farming for less than 10 years, you may also qualify for a scholarship - your local NOFA chapter can let you know if you do.

If you missed our Organic Land Care Annual Gathering last Tuesday, you can check out photos from the event on our Flickr page here.

Registration is continuing for our NOFA chapter OLC Accreditation Courses! If you'd like to take the course, or just want to learn more, check it out here.

small farms, especially those growing "specialty crops (fruits and vegetables) receive far fewer subsidies than large farms that produce cotton, corn and soy

the wealthy 1% can afford the local, organic, high quality food everyone needs to be healthy

the most economically depressed areas of the United States are often food deserts

supporting farming supports job creation

supporting organic, local farming supports much more job creation than on larger farms where farm machinery is relied on more heavily than manual labor

local farms and local foods support local economies instead of buying produce from South America which send our money out of the country or to multi-national corporations like Dole and Chiquita.

right now food production and poisonous chemical production (by large multinational corporations like Dow, Monsanto and Dupont) go hand in hand. Food produced organically is completely independent of the chemical production industry (unless their crops are contaminated by Monsanto's GMO genes of course)

Given all these connections (and there are many many more) farmers have joined Occupy Wallstreet. On December 4th, food justice activists (both producers and consumers) traveled from all over the coutry to occupy in New York City. The march began at La Plaza Cultural Community Farde and ended at Zuccotti Park/Liberty Plaza.
The message was that much of rural America supports the Occupy movement. The movement is not made up of lazy, spoiled notheasterners who would rather camp in parks in below freezing weather than get a job (come on).
Another occupy movement in New York City, protesters at Morning Glory Community Garden in the South Bronx were broken up by police and five were arrested. The police broke up a festival in celebration of food on the sidewalk because the community garden supporters had no permit. I should also add that the community garden (which used to be in illegal dumping site) was raided by the NYC Department of Housing Preservation & Development - pulling plants out by the roots, deconstructing raised beds, and building a fence around the community space in November.

Remember even if you're not prepared to put on multiple winter coats and illegally camp in Zuccotti Park, you can occupy the food movement. The only people who don't benefit from local food production are the large companies and corporations that have crafted our imbalanced global food system, and if they're not ready to change, then it's time to stop supporting them.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

When engaged in an organic versus conventional agricultural debate, proponents of conventional methods often use the "organic can't feed the world" argument. The reasons why vary depending on who you're talking to, but some possibilities are that there's not enough land, or organic agriculture doesn't produce high enough yields, or the local and organic farm system is too disorganized and inefficient. To that I ask, who said that conventional farms are efficient, have high yields, or use less land than organic methods? What studies provide that information?

A recent article by The Atlantic provides a comprehensive set of resources to prove that organic agriculture can not only feed the world, but that conventional can't. Under our current, largely conventional system, 1 billion people worldwide are undernourished. Dozens of studies have been compiled over the last few decades to show that conventional agriculture has generally failed in its long-term efforts to increase crop yields, and organic methods in fact equal and often surpass conventional yields, requiring less land as a result. I have written in the past about the Rodale Institute's 30 year study that supports such claims, and would also like to note the Iowa study that drew similar conclusions. The idea that conventional farming somehow produces more food on less land is a lie, and the fact that it is still widely accepted doesn't make it less of a lie.

Additionally, as The Atlantic mentions, there exists a notable lack of studies that provide hard evidence that organic farming can't feed the world. An excerpt from the article reads " In an exhaustive review using Google and several academic search
engines of all the scientific literature published between 1999 and 2007
addressing the question of whether or not organic agriculture could
feed the world, the British Soil Association, which supports and
certifies organic farms, found (PDF)
that there had been 98 papers published in the previous eight years
addressing the question of whether organic could feed the world. Every
one of the papers showed that organic farming had that potential. Not
one argued otherwise." Extensive marketing, lobbying, and misinformation has kept the public in the dark about the truth behind conventional ag for some time, but those barriers are slowly dissolving.

Lastly, I want to take a moment to talk about efficiency. Conventional agriculture has led our society to believe that bigger is better - that is to say that when you industrialize agriculture on a large scale, you are able to streamline your production system as you would in a factory, and thus produce higher yields with lower costs and less waste. The studies noted above as well as many others like them, along with the current global climate and ecological problems we are facing point to the illegitimacy of this belief. A network of small, local, organic farms is much more efficient than large scale conventional farming in terms of yield, waste, transportation costs, economic potential, ecological viability, and public health, to only name a few. One of the biggest hurdles the organic movement must jump today is breaking down that reputation of efficiency and plenty that conventional agriculture has made for itself.

If you want to start down the path toward true efficiency, check out your local farmer's market. Farmers markets and CSA programs exist even in winter, and are a great way to boost your local economy while enjoying fresh, local, whole foods. Check out our Winter Food Project to learn more.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

The Organic Land Care Program's Annual Gathering "Trees: Landscaping for Future Generations" was yesterday, December 6. We had an interesting line up of ecologists, landscape architects, tree care professionals, and forest pathologists. To start off the day, Peter Wild, CEO of Arborjet Inc. and Todd Harrington, an OLC Committee Member, and one of the authors of the original Standards for Organic Land Care discussed their careers pioneering organic tree care.

Our keynote, Tom Wessels, followed. Tom discussed scientific principles, mainly entropy and the law of self-organization to discuss how these principles govern nature and have supported life on earth for billions of years. He then discussed how these ideas can support human systems (in order to stop endangering all the other life on earth) for instance citing Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations to discuss the limits of economic growth.

Diane Devore discussed the arranging of trees in landscaping incorporating natives along the periphery of properties. Diane explained that a large element of organic landscaping was thinking about the landscape in 50 years, and planting trees for that landscape.

Dr. Claire Rutledge updated the audience on the Emerald Ash Borer's spread through out the United States and what it mean for New England forests and trees in residential areas.

After lunch Dr. Kevin Smith discussed tree care based on the biology of trees, and then how tree disease disrupts the bark, or trunk of the tree, and how some trees are able to protect themselves form diseases while others are more vulnerable.

Dr. Bob Marra followed up on this explanation of tree health and care with a description of a new technology used to measure the internal decay of wood called Tomography.

Finally Dr. Jim Conroy and Basia Alexander described some more spiritual approaches to tree healing, specifically their work Tree Whispering.

We closed out the day with a panel presenting business solutions for organic land care providers to keep business profitable in the recession. Our panelists were Todd Harrington, Aiken Tompkins and Mike Nadeau

Overall it was a pretty great day, we hope our attendees came away from the presentations with some insight on tree science and some new ideas about organic tree care!

Monday, December 5, 2011

It's crunch time here at the office! Our Organic Land Care Annual Gathering is tomorrow at 8:00am at the University of Connecticut, Storrs. This year's theme is Trees: Landscaping for Future Generations, and will feature Keynote Speaker Tom Wessels on The Foundational Principles of Sustainability. We have some really great speakers lined up for the event including Dr. Kevin T. Smith, Diane Devore, Dr. Robert Marra, Peter Wild, Todd Harrington, Dr. Claire Rutledge, Dr. Jim Conroy, and Basia Alexander. And the best part is that's it's not too late to register! Call the office at 203.888.5146 to get your last minute registration in!

The United Nations has declared 2011 the
"International Year of Forests" highlighting the environmental,
historical and cultural value of trees and forests around the world.
Presenters at the Annual Gathering will discuss the role of trees in our
natural history, their integration in organic landscaping, threats to
New England’s woods, and the importance of planting and preserving
native trees in the landscape. Despite the tendency to associate trees
with the environment, they are a central part of the designed
landscape. Trees are an ecological staple, providing habitat, flood and
erosion control, carbon sequestration and a host of other natural
services to developed areas.

Friday, December 2, 2011

The European Commission has proposed a greener Common Agriculture Policy for the European Union. Conventional farming organizations have criticized the commission's proposals for a greener agriculture policy, but European organic farmers view the proposed changes as positive steps toward sustainable agriculture. The Agricultural Commissioner, Dacian Ciolos has defended the proposed changes which encourage farmers to rotate crops, set aside permanent pasture and create woodlands or buffer zones as part of the European annual farm support program that constitutes 40% of EU spending.

Dacian Ciolos, EU Agriculture Commissioner

If it undergoes the proposed reforms, the program would use 30% of direct payments to promote conservation measures - an investment of about 11 billion euros.
Currently only about 5% of EU farmland is organic (which is actually pretty high in comparison to the United States' 0.6% of farmland being organic).
Ciolos' defense of the program is the part that American consumers,
voters and legislators might want to consider. "A major objective of the
reform is to provide the tools to provide both growth in agriculture and
sustainability . . . If not, it is difficult to justify the CAP as a
public policy." For a public policy, to be truly in the interest of the general public, it must work to improve agricultural yield (which practices like crop rotation have done for hundreds of years), and the quality of the soil, water and air of where people live (which can be achieved by using fewer synthetic chemicals and allowing buffers between farmland and water systems). Support for sustainable farming isn't in the interest of organic farmers as much as it is in the interest of generations to come, the environment, and farming communities. The American Farm Bill seems to be focused more on supporting the well-being of agricultural corporations, national food service providers, and grocery chains.

Thursday, December 1, 2011

The winter, more than any other season, is a time when many Americans eat more packaged, processed foods as local farmer's markets dwindle and access to fresh produce is often limited to factory farmed crops shipped in from far away. It's cold and dark out, and if cooking isn't your strong point, it's easy to get sucked into the convenience of prepackaged, non-local foods.

I recently read a post on Farmer's Market titled Forgotten Food: How We Lost Knowledge of Where Food Comes From, How to Cook It and What It Tastes Like that gives a brief synopsis of Ann Vileisis' Kitchen Literacy. This book chronicles America's food system, from its beginnings in 1700s agrarian society to the broken and disconnected monstrosity that it is today. As it turns out, America's transition from a society that had immense accumulated food knowledge to a nation where people often say food comes from "the grocery store" wasn't an easy one. Our ancestors fought against much of the commercialization and industrialization of food, leaving us a legacy not of complacency, but of activism. We owe it to ourselves and to our rich heritage to become reacquainted with where our food comes from, how to prepare it, and what it should taste like.

It is in this spirit that we started our Winter Food Project. After all, if we can develop a more personal relationship with our food in the toughest and leanest of seasons, we can do it at any time of the year. I encourage you to check out the resources available on our Winter Food Project page, and visit a winter farmer's market in your area. Access to whole, local food doesn't have to be seasonal, and we don't have to sacrifice flavor and nutrition just because it's wintertime.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Russell Libby really nailed the organic and sustainable message in his keynote speech at the MOFGA Common Ground Country Fair this past September. His speech was featured in this quarter's Organic Farmer and Gardener Magazine, which can be read here. The speech, Putting the Pieces Together - Our Next Food System, gives a comprehensive outlook of the global sustainable movement, highlighting many factors that must be addressed in order to make real lasting change in our environment and in our society. Libby not only speaks about large-scale global change, but also about what we can do as individuals and groups to address growing sustainability concerns in our communities. Our Executive Director, Bill Duesing, describes Russell Libby as "one of my heroes", and for all of us here at CT NOFA that really speaks to the value and importance of Libby's message. Please take a few minutes to read through his speech - I doubt you will be disappointed.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

On a typical trip to the grocery store, we're bombarded with a flood of catchy slogans and claims about what's in each product, where it comes from, and how buying it will benefit us. When we get to the meat counter, we often see two deceptively similar claims sitting right next to each other - the terms "certified organic" and "all natural". The package with the all natural logo is usually cheaper, and since it sounds so similar to organic, we should opt for the cheaper one, right? Unfortunately, like most things, you do in fact get what you pay for.

Certified USDA Organic foods are required to pass a rigorous federally mandated verification program before they can be considered organic. This process is governed by well established regulations and enforced by the US government. Animals that are raised organically must never be treated with antibiotics, and must only be fed organic, non-genetically modified food. Livestock raised under such strict regulations is often much more expensive than its factory farmed brethren, so buying the cheaper "natural" version might seem like a great deal.

However, foods labeled "natural" are cheaper for a reason. In truth, the natural label doesn't really tell us anything about the food. In the case of meat, the common assumption that all natural livestock was raised under better, more wholesome conditions than animals without the natural label is wholly incorrect. The natural label only means that the meat was minimally processed without artificial ingredients, which has nothing to do with how the animal lived before it reached the slaughterhouse.

According to an article for KNVO news, the USDA has been working to clarify this confusing labeling system, but for now they have had little success. For consumers, the best course of action for now is to know what different labels mean. I had posted a great resource from the Natural Resources Defense Council a while back as an addition to another topic, but I felt that I didn't give it enough direct attention at the time, so here it is again. This is a comprehensive list of labels rated on reliability, with full explanations about what each label really means. If we arm ourselves with the knowledge that's out there, we will ultimately be doing ourselves, our economy, and our food policy a huge favor.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Food sovereignty has been a steadily growing movement in the state of Maine, with many towns adopting ordinances that legalize small scale food production and sales without the need for costly and time-consuming state and federal permits. As could be expected, the state is none too happy with these recent developments, and along with the FDA, has spearheaded a recent effort to push back against the rising food sovereignty movement.

Farmer Dan Brown is a resident of Blue Hill, Maine, who owns a single dairy cow. Dan uses much of what the cow produces to feed himself and his family, but also has an on-farm farm stand where locals go to buy bottles of the surplus milk. Dan isn't a food distributor, and the notion of getting permits and facilities to be in line with state law is nonsensical in his case, but the state is cracking down on his operation nonetheless. According to the state and the FDA, his farm is breaking the law by selling supposedly dangerous unpasteurized milk to consumers without getting necessary inspections and permits. Dan, his family, and his purchasers have never had health problems with his milk, while legalized large-scale factory milk producers have had countless issues over the years with their product, but this irony seems lost on state officials who want to see Dan's farm closed to consumers. In response to Dan's refusal to shut down his operation, the state of Maine is filing suit against him. It is up to the community and those of us who care about local small-scale food production to convince the state to drop the lawsuit against Dan Brown and respect the authority of Blue Hill's local food sovereignty laws.

Food Renegade recently wrote up a nicely articulated post on farmer Dan's plight that includes two informative videos on the subject, the more concise of which can be found here. If you'd like to read the full post, check here. The post also contains information on how you can do your part to end the lawsuit against Dan Brown and support the hard work of small-scale local farmers.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Hey Everyone,While we're on the theme of giving thanks - think about how you value access to organic, local foods and Connecticut Grown produce, and please read through this letter from Bill Duesing outlining all that CT NOFA has done this year. We are so thankful for your support, but we still need more help!Happy Thanksgiving,Kristiane

From Bill Duesing

Beginning women farmers workshop

Executive Director

Greetings!

Next year will mark 30 years that CT NOFA has been Connecticut's strongest voice advocating and educating for a local and organic food system and organic care of the land.

CT NOFA needs your help to set a firm foundation for the next 30 years.

A vigorous and productive local and organic food system and

Canning workshop at Common Ground

a healthy relationship to the natural world are necessary elements for a sustainable and joyful future.

If you understand CT NOFA's important role in providing a better future, you can support us right now. See below.

If you would like to know more about the importance of organic agriculture, its ability to feed the world and CT NOFA's work, please read on. You'll find fascinating information, clickable links, details on CT NOFA's plans, income and expenses, and pictures of our events.

Educated nearly 1,000 people in organic farming, gardening and land care through our conferences, courses and workshops.

Participated in the Working Lands Alliance and the Farms, Food and Jobs working group to advance farmland protection and farm viability in Connecticut.

Received notice of funding for three years work training and networking beginning farmers.

Received notice of funding for two years work promoting Community Supported Agriculture and connecting farmers with consumers through CSA fairs.

Worked to limit the damage from Genetically Modified Organisms.

Sued Monsanto by joining with Organic Seed Producers, Farmers and Farmers' Organizations in a suit brought by the Public Patent Foundation to prevent Monsanto from suing farmers whose crops are contaminated buy its transgenic genes.

Partnered with the Just Label It Campaign to advocate for mandatory GMO-labeling laws and laid the groundwork to work with state legislators who will introduce a labeling law for Connecticut.

Published the Introduction to Organic Lawns and Yards booklet. It has been well received and has been ordered by towns, libraries, homeowners, and land care professionals as a resource for their clients. Order one or more copies here.

Participated with the other NOFA chapters in national policy initiatives to strengthen organic agriculture and support small farms.

Our 30th Annual Winter Conference will be held on March 3, 2012 at Manchester Community College with Jeffrey Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, a best seller about the dangers of GMOs, as keynote speaker and over 40 great workshops.

Food is the way we take stored solar energy, roughly equivalent to the energy contained in a cup of gasoline each day, into our bodies to power them.

According to the FDA, over two thirds of the fruits and vegetables consumed in this country are imported. Food is largely (over 95 percent) made up of elements derived from air and water with only a small percentage derived from the soil. So when, for example, we import garlic from China, we are transporting water, air and sunshine from China at a great fossil fuel cost. It is time to reform this disorganized, inefficient food system, and it can be done.

Help CT NOFA support local food!

Growing more nutrient rich fruits, vegetables, and grains, and finding ways to get that food efficiently to everyone in our state will directly address many major health problems including the lifestyle diseases of diabetes, obesity, cancer and heart disease.

demonstrated that agro-ecology, if adequately supported, can double food production in whole regions within 10 years while mitigating climate change and alleviating rural poverty. Agro-ecological agriculture is very close to organic and includes gardens, community production, small farms and sustainable family farms.

Thank you for your interest in and support for local and organic food. I look forward to hearing from you and seeing you at one of our events.