Bonkers Blog November 2013

Among recent
readers’ emails was one which suggested I might be entirely mistaken in my belief that the police were
four months late in responding to my Subject Access
Request because they had run out of black marker pens with which to redact
practically everything. The suggestion was that something close to the reverse
might be true; that there is almost nothing to redact.

Given that my contact with the police has been confined to that engineered by the
criminals within Bexley council, the only things which can be linked to my name
are Teresa O’Neill’s discredited (by the IPCC) harassment complaint and the obscenities
uploaded to the web from councillor Peter Craske’s phone line.

According to Bexleyheath police in December last year, the investigation into the latter under Chief
Superintendent Victor Olisa produced one of the largest files ever seen in
Arnsberg Way until “political interference” brought his investigation to a
premature end. However the earlier investigation under Chief Superintendent Dave
Stringer was almost certainly a sham.

He tried to
end it early
offering excuses that did not stand up to scrutiny. FOIs were declared to be not in the public
interest and a complaint to Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe resulted in a
complete whitewash for every useless police officer involved. We know it was an
apology for an investigation because the Independent Police Complaints
Commission confirmed it and ordered it to be done again.

So the suggestion is that my Subject Access Request will reveal a gaping hole
from June 2011 to March 2012 and demonstrate for all to see that Bexleyheath
police attempted to bury the crime committed by their council friends. Maybe
that’s why the SAR is so late. Why didn’t I think of that?