Janeé Harteau, Chief of Police January 6, 2017350 South 5th Street Room 130 Mailed: Certified MailMinneapolis, MN 55415-1389Phone: 612-673-3559E-mail: Janee.Harteau@minneapolismn.govRe: Criminal complaint vs. Anthony D. WebsterThis is my criminal complaint against Anthony D. Webster of 1615 44TH Ave N., Minneapolis, MN 55412 (Property ID: 04-029-24-21-0118 Hennepin Co. Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2016 Phone: (415) 617-9111 Email: tonywebster@gmail.com & tony@tonywebster.com) for his malicious attempt to harass, intimidate and strike fear not only into me but also into a member of my family by his filing of perjured statements into the frivolous Hennepin Co District court case 27-CV-16-17197 and by making a false report to Pope Co. sheriff's department.On November 28, 2016 at approximately 8:30pm I was minding my own business in my home speaking on the phone by the computer when the peace and quietude of the night was shattered by a loud banging by the front door. As I turned the swivel chair toward the direction of the loud noise I could see through the picture window what appeared to be Pope Co. Sheriff's deputy standing at the door. I was forced to excuse myself from my unfinished phone call. I then turned on my personal audio recorder and gathered up my camera. I turned on the camera as I went into the kitchen calendar to get the day's date. I then went back to the computer to get the time and date. Apparently, I was a little rattled by this unwelcomed banging and the presence of the deputy. As I approached the glass window of the front door I had my personal audio recorder in my left hand and my camera in the right hand. I stood there in silence as an individual I recognized as Joshua Owens standing approximately (3) three feet from screen door. Owens was holding a number of papers in his right hand. He attempted to touch the handle of the door and I yelled “Don't touch the door!” After a short amount of time Owen dropped the paperwork on the deck by the door. Owen returned to his squad and left.After recovering the paperwork, I heard the family member who was home at the time state that they had no intention of answering the door. [Note: It is a matter of the public record that Pope Co. sheriff deputies not only broke and entered into my home on 07-20-07 without a warrant but also covered it up with perjured testimony.] On initial examination of the paperwork it appeared to be a what I would describe as a malicious SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) suit that was filed in the 4th judicial district. Upon further examination, I noticed that SLAPP suit was filed by a Anthony D. Webster. I have reason to suspect Webster is a social misfit who is mentally and emotionally unstable. I reached that reasonable conclusion based on the following wild, outrageous and perjured statements found in 27-CV-16-17197:Perjured statement #1: On the same day, I blocked Respondent on Twitter, preventing him from seeing my account or interacting with me. m) On November 27, 2016, Respondent circumvented my Twitter block three times, taking screen captures of my Twitter account, and reposting them under his account, directly sent the content to me and others I had interacted with online. 27-CV-16-17197 SLAPP suit page 4 of 8.Anyone familiar with social media terms of service (TOS) agreements, like the judge who rubber-stamped this malicious SLAPP suit, knows or should have known that the above mentioned statement is wild, outrageous and perjured. Why? First of all, Webster makes no mention or provided a single piece of evidence that he reported this alleged TOS violation to Twitter. That must be why I still am using my original Twitter account @Lion__News. Second, it is safe to say that the FBI and not the corrupt Pope Co. Sheriff's dept would have been banging on my door on the night of November 28, 2016 if these the allegations were true. In fact, I have not heard a peep from the FBI nor Twitter in regard to Webster's wild, outrageous and perjured statement of circumventing Twitter's computers system.https://twitter.com/tos?lang=en Twitter Terms of Service (if you live in the United States) 4. Using the Services. … You may not do any of the following while accessing or using the Services: (i) access, tamper with, or use non-

Page 1 of 7

public areas of the Services, Twitter’s computer systems, or the technical delivery systems of Twitter’s providers; … We also reserve the right to access, read, preserve, and disclose any information as we reasonably believe is necessary to (i) satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request, …

It is quite ironic that the self-proclaimed, “web engineer,” “data nerd,” and so-called “civil rights journalist” who just happens to regularly attends hacking conventions and hacking seminars would falsely accuse me of “hacking” his Twitter account.

Started in 1992 by the Dark Tangent, DEF CON is the world's longest running and largest under-ground hacking conference. Hackers, corporate IT professionals, www.defcon.org/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/diversey/14129173117/ Tony Webster Entitled: “Hacking APIs in Federal Government” – TransparencyCamp 2014 Notes / drawings by Barbara Siegel(@look2listen)Not to mention that projecting ones sins onto another is standard operating procedure for a false accusers, isn't it? Does Webster feel hidden guilt for hacking? Oh, by the way, Webster will be the prime suspect if I suspect that my family's computers have been hacked. Apparently, the to-good-to-be-true hacking fairytale of the in-your-face paparazzi/hack Webster had the rubber-stamping judge bamboozled.

Perjured statement #2: e) Respondent's communications with me is incoherent and difficult to parse. As best as I can tell, Respondent is upset with me because I don't help him with his public records, requests and because I don't personally arrest government officials who wrong him. 27-CV-16-17197 SLAPP suit page 2-3 of 8.

What the rubber-stamping judge who signed off on this frivolous nonsense intentionally “forgot” to take judicial notice of was the giant void in Webster's fairytale that was supposed to be filled by actual evidence or at least a police report that substantiated these wild, outrageous and perjured claims. I have a reasonable suspicion that Webster's filing fee prevented the rubber-stamping judge from falling back onto their training on how to weed out frivolous suits, haven't I?I also have a reasonable suspicion that social misfit Webster was emboldened by recent accounts in the

Page 2 of 7

local rags that the Hennepin County courts were the perfect weapon of harassment and intimidation.

The involvement of an underage recruit in the alleged sexual assault was first revealed during a Nov. 2 court hearing when the woman sought to uphold a restraining order she filed against the players. The players’ attorney, Hutton, attempted to argue that the woman was the one who raped the recruit, since his age makes him a juvenile under Minnesota’s statutory rape law. … Asked about the recruit during the woman’s testimony, her attorney, Amy Isenor, instructed her client to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege, the constitutional right to decline to answer potentially incriminating questions. Underage Gopher football recruit involved in alleged sexual misconduct - Underage recruit involved in alleged sexual assault. By Brandon Stahl Star Tribune December 17, 2016 — 10:12am.

I have a reasonable suspicion that social misfit Webster lusted after the power and notoriety that can be gained by filing false charges in the corrupt Hennepin county courts. FYI: I do have clear, precise, and unquestionable proof that false accusers associated with the University of Minnesota use the courts to harass and intimidate their victims. Would you like a copy of the evidence? No, right?

Let's see how social misfit Webster interacts with the public at large, shall we? If Webster is mentally and emotionally unstable, then he would have an irrational fear of not only being asked reasonable questions but also to an over-dramatic response to requests for proof for his allegations, wouldn't he? See Webster's over-the-top interaction with Lucina Kayee below:

It would appear that social misfit Webster responds to legitimate questions with all sorts of drama and all sorts of threats of filing false police reports and all sorts of threats of filing frivolous lawsuits to intimidate and harass the individual with legitimate questions into silence, wouldn't it? It would, wouldn't it? Sounds just like Webster's frivolous 27-CV-16-17197 SLAPP suit, doesn't it? This kind of outlandish, socially unacceptable behavior isn't tolerated on Twitter, is it?

Page 3 of 7

https://g.twimg.com/policies/TheTwitterUserAgreement_3.pdfAbusive Behavior We believe in freedom of expression and in speaking truth to power, but that means little as an underlying philosophy if voices are silenced because people are afraid to speak up. In order to ensure that people feel safe expressing diverse opinions and beliefs, we do not tolerate behavior that crosses the line into abuse, including behavior that harasses, intimidates, or uses fear to silence another user’s voice.

Of course, social misfit Webster knows or should know that corrupt courts love the drama created by false accusation in court. That must be why miscreant Webster intentionally left out all the facts and context from his fairytale.

The witness must appreciate what lawyers have known for years: the courtroom is a stage where attorney's carefully direct a drama wherein witnesses unfold their story before the jury's eyes. The jury represents the audience of this production and the witnesses become players. In this carefully constructed arena, the witness needs to fit the jury's image of someone who is telling the truth. Fred E. Inbau, John E. Reid, Joseph P. Buckley, Brian C. Jayne, Criminal Interrogation and Confessions, 4th Ed., page 454.

However, it would appear that Webster's wild, outrageous and perjured fairytales find a safe harbor in the rigged and corrupt Hennepin County District court, wouldn't it? It would, wouldn't it?

You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor. Exodus 20:16 King James Version

Now that we know social misfit Webster's standard operating procedure for interacting with the general

A double-minded man is unstable in all his ways. James 1:8 King James version. He that is first to speak his own cause seemth just; but his neighbor cometh and searcheth him. Proverbs 18:17 King James Version.

Page 4 of 7

public, let's look at Webster trying to curry special favor from the corrupt local media and the corrupt Red Lake County Attorney, shall we? If Webster is mentally and emotionally unstable, then he would have an irrational fear of the corrupt local media not paying attention to him, wouldn't he? He would, wouldn't he? If Webster is mentally and emotionally unstable he would go out his way to ignore corrupt local official who are harassing him, wouldn't he? He would, wouldn't he? Again I blame the corrupt Hennepin county court for being the incubator for Webster's malicious SLAPP suit. Why? Because social misfit Webster knows that Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek's sonny boy Ryan is getting special treatment from the rigged Hennepin County courts, doesn't he? How could a self-proclaimed “researcher” who has been obsessed with cyberstalking me not know, right? Sonny boy Ryan has received special treatment in rigged case Case No. 27-CR-14-21295 State of Minnesota vs RYAN JAMES STANEK; Case No. 27-CR-15-337 State of Minnesota vs RYAN JAMES STANEK and in Case No. 27-VB-16-128163 State of Minnesota vs RYAN JAMES STANEK, hasn't he? He he, hasn't he? In fact, it would appear that corrupt judge Daniel C. Moreno did all sorts of special favors for the under-charged Ryan prior to magically & mysteriously on 12-07-16 recusing himself, wouldn't it?

Why wouldn't miscreant Webster be emboldened to use the corrupt Hennipen county district court as a

Page 5 of 7

weapon when the corrupt judges have no problem with the corrupt Brooklyn Center police use a PBT test to make the wild and outrageous claim that convicted pot smoker Ryan Stanek is safe to drive, right? Why wouldn't miscreant Webster be emboldened to use the corrupt Hennipen county district court as a weapon when the corrupt judges have no problem with the corrupt Brooklyn Center police magically & mysteriously willfully refuse to do a field sobriety tests on Ryan – not having a DRE (Drug Recognition Expert) called to the scene to examine Ryan – not taking pictures of the drug test nor the drug scale – not issuing a warrant for Ryan's phone, huh? So we can see how mentally and emotionally unstable social misfits, like Webster, would lust after the same type of special treatment that Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek's sonny boy Ryan was receiving, can't we? We can, can't we?

What is miscreant Tony Webster's motive? I have a reasonable suspicion that the motive is money.

I also have a reasonable suspicion that miscreant Webster wants to: waste my valuable time, waste my valuable resources and waste valuable public resources on the same kind of litigation merry-go-round that corrupt Sheriff Stanek has baited social misfit Webster into. Misery loves company, right?

I ended up filing a lawsuit earlier this year. Which was a grueling um experience. You know it's not … litigation is not fun for anyone. But it really this an my experience with Bloomington brought to light that um it really there are not enough remedies for for member of the public who have problems getting data from governments. You know the … You can either sue in a civil action or in administrative action. Both are with a court of law before a judge. There's exhibits and um … The administrative route is supposed to be fast and cheap. But it is neither. … So. Yeah, it it was not a fun experience. … I think the um the remedies are not equitable because it um you it takes too much for the public to enforce their rights. But then there is not enough at stake for the government to care. ICYMI #18: Tony Webster – Freedom of Information & Land of 10,000 Cameras Posted by Sam Richards, nstarpost.com On June 04, 2016

However, I am not going to baited into miscreant Webster's frivolous SLAAP suit. Which is why I am filing a criminal complaint. (Note: I'm not expecting any justice from the corrupt Minneapolis police dept, am I?)

not public data, as defined in section 13.055, subdivision 1, is guilty of a misdemeanor. (b) Willful violation of this chapter, including any action subject to a criminal penalty under paragraph (a), by any public employee constitutes just cause for suspension without pay or dismissal of the public employee. (Note: In case you try to play dumb – I am not inferring that Webster is a public official)

Finally, I have a reasonable suspicion that social misfit Webster thinks that if corrupt Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Staenk can use to use the corrupt Hennepin county district court to launch himself into the governor's seat, then why can he use the rigged court to fulfill his delusions of grandeur.

You will note that I have 'CCed' my complaint to some of the so-called media watchdogs. (Note: Miscreant Webster has self-appointed himself as a so-called watchdog, hasn't he?) I'm not expecting any justice from them either, am I? Why would I expect any justice from Jenna Ross, SPJ vice president /Star Tribune hack or Tom Lyden, KMSP's hack, huh? No, I 'CCed' Ross because I have reasonable suspicion that Ross has those positions because she was illegally filming (ex. 19HA-CR-13-2934) during the high-profile Brok Nathaniel Junkermeier (34-CR-13-596) with West-Central Tribune's Caroline Lange. And I have a reasonable suspicion that Lyden still has his job with because he broke and entered into a car to steal a video tape for a story. I trust the corrupt media as much as I trust your corrupt organization, FYI: I have audios of your Deputy Chief Travis Glampe and his staff making harassing phone calls to me. You want those audios? No, right?

Just so you know that this is also my complaint to Kate Fogarty, District Administrator. I am demanding an investigation into this corrupt and unknown judge who rubber-stamped miscreant Webster's 27-CV-16-17197 SLAPP suit. FYI: unknown since I can't read the scrawl/scribble that passes for the signature of the corrupt judge. Just so you know, I'm not expecting any justice Kate Fogarty, District Administrator either. In fact, I only am filing this legitimate complaint to show that none of you can be trusted to do your advertised jobs. _________________________________________Terry Dean, Nemmers20179 County Road 28Glenwood, MN 56334(320) 283-5713

This is my formal criminal complaint against Casey Joe Carl, Minneapolis City Clerk and former Minneapolis Police Chief Jenee Harteau for misuse public resources (MS 609.52 Theft), misconduct of public officer or employee (MS 609.43), and harassment (MS 609.748) for their willful refusal to comply with the Minnesota government data practices act (MGDPA – MS 13.09 Penalties). I am also filing a complaint against Harteau for misconduct of public officer or employee (MS 609.43) for willfully refusing to take my formal criminal complaint and evidence against the frivolous/malicious litigant & perjurer Anthony “Tony” D. Webster.

Evidence of misuse of public resources – criminal misconduct of public officers – willful refusal to take Nemmers’ statement and provide Nemmers with the public portion of the public portion of the initial complaint report for frivolous/malicious litigant & perjurer Anthony “Tony” D. Webster. See attached.

I have received a copy of your letter to Chief Harteau dated 06 January 2017. … If you are attempting to file a police report, you are welcome to contact 311, or go to any 1 of our 5 police precincts to make a report. Letter – Bruce Folkens, Deputy Chief – Minneapolis Police Dept. Investigations Bureau. See attached.

I have reason to suspect that now former Minneapolis Chief of Police Janeé Harteau ordered Deputy Chief of the Minneapolis Police Dept. Investigations Bureau Bruce Folkens mail me this harassing letter to me. I also have reason to suspect that Harteau ordered Folkens to backdate the harassing ________________________________________________ 1 Response to a Data Request • Government entities should respond in one of three ways 1. Provide access to the data (and copies when requested) 2. Inform you the data are classified as not public (must give statute section) 3. Inform you the data do not exist • Not responding is not a proper response. Can I ask for that? Information Policy Analysis Division (IPAD) MN Department of Administration Website: www.ipad.state.mn.us Phone: 651.296.6733 Email: info.ipad@state.mn.us page 12 (emphasis added) 2 However, the Department did not provide Ms. Kerr with access to any of the data for five weeks. ... Although the Department did not provide information about its data practices policies and procedures, in instances like this one, those procedures ought to provide for a response within a matter of days, not weeks. Minnesota Department of Administration - Advisory Opinion 95-042. (emphasis added)

Page 1 of 3

letter. Why? My Lion News‏ @Lion__News Twitter account was documenting the willful MGDPA time limit violations. Folkens isn’t required to follow illegal orders, is he? He isn’t, is he?https://twitter.com/Lion__News/status/824635081650081792 Lion News‏ @Lion__News 10 day time limit came/went - No response from @ChiefHarteau & "Go to hell!" email from @CityMinneapolis Responsible Authority Casey Carl? 7:08 AM - 26 Jan 2017https://twitter.com/Lion__News/status/826898953983688704 Lion News‏ @Lion__News FYI: @ChiefHarteau received criminal complaint vs mentally/emotionally unstable social misfit on January 9, 2017 right? Where is ICR, huh? 1:04 PM - 1 Feb 2017https://twitter.com/Lion__News/status/826898953983688704 Lion News‏ @Lion__News FYI: @ChiefHarteau received criminal complaint vs mentally/emotionally unstable social misfit on January 9, 2017 right? Where is ICR, huh? 1:04 PM - 1 Feb 2017Motive: Money. So-called public servants get so drunk on power that they think they should get paid to think and act like they were above the law, don’t they? That’s your problem too, isn’t it?"I think the amount is fair," Council President Barb Johnson said. "The challenge is going to be the non-disparagement clause." Nondisparagement clause in Harteau severance draws City Council scrutiny All 13 council members said they were not privy to negotiations. By Adam Belz Star Tribune SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 — 3:45PMAnd because Minneapolis Chief of Police Janeé Harteau willfully refused to do her job by willfully refusing to take my valid criminal complaint against frivolous/malicious litigant & perjurer Anthony “Tony” D. Webster and send me the public portion of my ICR then I am filing the complaint with you. I am also making a Chapter 13 data request for the public portion of the initial complaint report for my criminal complaint against miscreant Anthony D. Webster. I am the subject of the data, aren’t I? And just in case you try the same trick that Harteau pulled you may want to know I have expert testimony that you are not only required to take my complaint but also give me the the public portion of my ICR.“Look, they (Law enforcement officers) have to listen to you and take a statement. … But, then I become a witness and have to exclude myself from the case.” Douglas County Attorney Christopher Karpan. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8JPaigLc_0 Lion News FYI - Cops Have To Take Complaint? A Conflict For One Attorney Is A Conflict For All?

You know it’s really hard to ... to sue government. To … to go up against them to get records. And not many people do it because it costs a lot of money. It takes a lot of time. I’m lucky to have ah pro-bono attorneys. But, um, you know if I didn’t have pro-bono attorneys it would cost you know a hundred thousand dollars to go through you know all all this work. 5:52-6:11/30:13 One software engineer's fight for transparent government by Tom Weber, Cody Nelson MPR Radio · July 3, 2017 https://www.mprnews.org/story/2017/07/03/tony-webster-interview-open-government-data-foia

Appellant, vs. Hennepin County, et al., Respondents) Webster is that scam artist who is getting all that free legal help to sue you, isn’t he? He is, isn’t he? The scam is that Webster said that he had no

It is, isn’t it? Oh, by the way, I will be releasing some damning information in the future on how both the City of Minneapolis and Hennepin County are trying to destroy the reputation of an older black couple by illegally withholding James Campbell’s MGDPA subject data from him. The smear campaign has cost James Campbell numerous job opportunities, hasn’t it? It has, hasn’t it? And James has all sorts of incriminating audio recordings, hasn’t he? He has, hasn’t he?

Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman is still mad at me for proving that it is a conflict of interest from him to prosecute Minneapolis cops, isn’t he?

He is, isn’t he? How can I tell? He’s still illegally withholding the entire Hennepin County Attorney’s office policy and procedure manual from me, isn’t he? He is, isn’t he? Sound like I’ll need to file another criminal complaint with the Minneapolis police, doesn’t it? Maybe the new police chief, Medaria (Rondo) Arradondo won’t make the same stupid mistake that Harteau made, huh?

When are you going to acknowledge receipt of complaint against your corrupt Casey Joe Carl, Minneapolis City Clerk & corrupt former Minneapolis Police Chief Jenee Harteau's staff, huh? When am I going to get the readily available, free, electronic, public data that was illegally withheld from me, huh? When are your corrupt cops going to acknowledge receipt of my criminal complaint against that slandering harasser Anthony "Tony" D. Webster, huh?

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=13.09 13.09 PENALTIES. (a) Any person who willfully violates the provisions of this chapter or any rules adopted under this chapter or whose conduct constitutes the knowing unauthorized acquisition of not public data, as defined in section 13.055, subdivision 1, is guilty of a misdemeanor. (b) Willful violation of this chapter, including any action subject to a criminal penalty under paragraph (a), by any public employee constitutes just cause for suspension without pay or dismissal of the public employee.Attachment: 090617_Harteau_Complaint2.pdf

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=13.09 13.09 PENALTIES. (a) Any person who willfully violates the provisions of this chapter or any rules adopted under this chapter or whose conduct constitutes the knowing unauthorized acquisition of not public data, as defined in section 13.055, subdivision 1, is guilty of a misdemeanor. (b) Willful violation of this chapter, including any action subject to a criminal penalty under paragraph (a), by any public employee constitutes just cause for suspension without pay or dismissal of the public employee.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=13.09
13.09 PENALTIES. (a) Any person who willfully violates the provisions
of this chapter or any rules adopted under this chapter or whose conduct
constitutes the knowing unauthorized acquisition of not public data, as
defined in section 13.055, subdivision 1, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(b) Willful violation of this chapter, including any action subject to a
criminal penalty under paragraph (a), by any public employee
constitutes just cause for suspension without pay or dismissal of the
public employee.

Are you aware that Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek, Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman and Minneapolis Council President Barb Johnson have all acknowledged receipt of my complaint against former Minneapolis Chief Janeé Harteau and against the slandering, psycho, harasser Anthony "Tony" D. Webster but Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges (612) 800-2455 has not? Minneapolis Council President Barb Johnson has informed me that she forwarded my complaint to the Minneapolis attorney's office, hasn't she? She has, hasn't she?

Have you received a call from James Campbell? James records all his phone calls, doesn't he? He does, doesn't he? Which means that you're going to be outed if you've made some wild and outrageous claims that you were going to look into James' situation and then don't, right? That's right, isn't it?

Why isn't City of Minneapolis City Attorney Susan Segal responding to your email to contact me, huh? Segal has a vendetta against me for tossing a monkey wrench into her malicious prosecution in Case No. 27-CR-11-27881 State of Minnesota vs ALVIN SCHLANGEN, hasn't she? She has, hasn't she? And Segal has a vendetta against me for tossing a monkey wrench into her failed 2015 run for 4th judicial district, hasn't she? She has, hasn't she? What are you going to do about Segal's willful refusal to respond to your email directing her to contact me, huh? Inquiring minds want to know, don't they?

Additionally, the guild said Segal had used her office to restrict access to public data about abuses by the police department, and pursued prosecutions that were “unreasonably harsh” on political activists, including Occupy protesters. Lawyers Guild urges council to reject City Attorney's reappointment By mayarao, Star Tribune February 5, 2014 — 2:12pm http://www.startribune.com/lawyers-guild-urges-council-to-reject-city-attorney-s-reappointment/243750261/ https://www.scribd.com/document/204917384/Segal-Letter