AN AGENDA FOR THE NEW CITY MANAGERWhat do you want Camille Cates Barnett to know?

The latest permutation in the District's governance is the appointment of a single
individual to manage the operations of the major departments delivering service to
citizens. It is into the hands of Camille Cates Barnett that those responsibilities have
been placed. This month's assembly meeting offers Federation members an opportunity to
hear from her what her initial assessments of the government and its workers are capable
of, what they can be motivated to do, and what reforms are necessary.It is also a chance
for Federation members to tell her what, from their perspective, is NOT working in the
District. Community leaders' involvement with key players in those District departments
will give Barnett information she needs if reforms are, in fact, going to be accomplished.

Among the issues ripe for discussion are the balances that must be achieved between
development and habitability, between businesses and residents, between tourists end
taxpayers. And then there is the broad question of policy toward nonprofit institutions.

Barnett's background shows she has had to deal with the big picture and with the
nitty-gritty. Ten years in Dallas saw her rise through ranks to become Deputy City
Manager, and later five years as City Manager of Austin, where she was CEO for a city
roughly the size of Washington, with a $1 billion budget and 10,000 employees, operating
22 departments that included a hospital and a municipal airport.

(The District, of course, has four times the budget and three times the work force.)

But Barnett has also consulted for better governance in Russia and Croatia, in El
Salvador and in Gaza and the west Bank.

Certainly these are "big picture" assignments in truly troubled places. Such
experience has never been cited as necessary to manage the District. But it probably can't
hurt.

Major voter rights developments for District:Protections for challenged ballots considered

At the Board of Elections  The District's Board of Elections and Ethics
has recently begun cross-checking its registration data with surrounding jurisdictions.
For Prince Georges County, the BOEE found nearly 3,000 persons retaining the right to vote
in both places. Similar cross-checking is going on in Montgomery County and in Virginia.

This demonstration that the confusion of election-day polling District's voter rolls
are open to fraud, that "Ward Nine" is more than a wry commentary, makes the
effort that the Federation and some of its member organizations have undertaken still more
important.

In the courts  The election lawsuit that sprang out of 1996 ANC elections
is  at last  before the Court of Appeals for argument. The interim decision of
the special master would only make the "Ward Nine" problem worse. Judge Steffen
Graae ruled out the ability to challenge ineligible voters on the basis of telephone
directories or drivers' licenses. It is hoped that the Court of Appeals or the Federal
District Court will find to the contrary.

In the Council  Council is considering legislation that would finally
establish a process for hearings on challenged voters that would occur away from the
confusion of election-day polling places.

The legislation is sponsored by Kathy Patterson and is co-sponsored by members Ambrose,
Catania, Evans and Schwartz. It would give poll watchers the right to provide evidence
that a person is not qualified to vote  and to challenge the Board's decision
directly in Superior Court.

Several Federation Board members testified at hearings held by the
Government Operations Committee, supported by testimony from the American Civil Liberties
Union; they made recommendations for strengthening or correcting the draft legislation.

Among the changes recommended was the right of candidates and poll
watchers to review the thousands of "administratively challenged" ballots that
are decided by the Board in closed session.

These most irregular of votes, it is argued, need to be subjected to the
scrutiny of candidates and representatives of the public.

In addition, testimony advocated that voters must attest to the fact that
they actuary reside in the ANC district in which they seek to vote.

And most testimony supported some form of identification of voters when
they seek ballots.

In the months since the Federation's November presentation on the
Convention Center, answers to key questions that were asked that night are still not in
hand.

The Committee of 100 on the Federal City, a colleague organization, has
sponsored detailed studies of the Mt. Vernon Square proposed site, but returns to the
conclusion that this location appears to bring costs to a level that is hundreds of
millions of dollars more expensive than the possible alternative behind Union Station. And
those millions of additional dollars will produce a site with no parking at all, and no
space for expansion.

Advocates of the Mt. Vernon site point to support from some immediate
neighborhood residents and organizations, but they seem to ignore the fact that every
small business in the District will have to pay for the additional costs  and few
will benefit from additional trade generated by the Center. Additionally, every dollar
 from whatever source  is a dollar that cannot go for other District
priorities: better schools, safer streets, improved regulatory enforcement, more
competitive tax rates.

Moreover, the Shaw Coalition, sited in the immediate vicinity, leads the
opposition to the Mt. Vernon Square location because of the belief that the new facility
and the traffic it generates will destroy their community.

This is the largest construction project ever proposed for the District.
It is imperative that basic information about costs and revenues be made available to
everyone before commitments are made that cannot be reversed.

Washington Convention Center Authority general Manager Lewis Dawley 
who promised answers last November  still has not provided them. Dawley, who is paid
$175,000 a year (plus an Eddie Bauer model 1997 Ford Explorer) has been unable to produce
the information.

Economic Development chair Charlene Drew Jarvis has promised the Shaw
Coalition answers to a specific list of questions, information that should be available to
all citizens under Freedom of Information provisions.

Her committee must move legislation for approval by the Council and
Control Board that will permit the further development of the convention center and the
mechanisms for its funding.

MEETING: Monday, March 9 at 7:30 p.m. at St. Thomas Parish, Church
Street and 18th NW. Sponsored by Dupont Circle ANC to discuss
Convention Center. All welcome.

Little noticed in the shadow of looming, immediate land use questions.
(convention centers, trash facilities, and the like), a consent agreement between the
District government and the U. S. Department of Justice has the potential to undermine the
fabric of regulation and case law that sets land use policy for the District of Columbia.

CBRFs are community-based residential facilities. They normally are known
as the group homes or neighborhood institutions that meet the needs of the disabled,
youths in need of detention, half-way houses, and shelters.

Most communities have acknowledged that reasonable burden should be shared
among communities, with no particular neighborhood being inundated with many such
facilities, lest the family- residential character no longer be supported.

The consent agreement would establish matter of right development
authority to anyone seeking to operate such a facility in an R-4 residential community
(and higher zoning)  and would allow the developer the further privilege of
''confidential'' treatment of the application.

This would bar public knowledge of any information about the project that
the developer wished to keep from them. Decisions would be made by DCRA's Zoning
Administrator, and it is unclear whether any appellate rights exist.

There are no standards for evaluating impact on neighboring properties, no
standards for density of institutional use, no provision for public input at all. Unclear
is the standing of present historic preservation codes, regulatory limitations, and
adopted moratoriums.

Another question is whether the city administrator had to power to mandate
the "blanket waiver of all facially neutral zoning policies and rules, regardless of
facts."

R-4 zoning allows for row houses and flats; the only more restrictive
zones are one-family houses and row dwellings. And it is unclear whether the
"reasonable accommodation" standard could be extended to those residential
categories as well. The communities that are most immediately concerned with this waiver
of the zoning code are Capital Hill and 16th Street Heights, but it is a question that
should concern all neighborhoods.

MEETING: The Zoning Commission will hold a hearing on CBRFs on
Thursday, March 19 at 7:00 p.m., 441 Fourth Street NW, second floor.

The first change in Federation Assembly meeting date in two years was
necessary to accommodate the calendar of Camille Cates Barnett. It seemed important to
visit with her, and we opted for flexibility. Please take advantage of the session and
enjoy the informal reception afterward.

BUSINESS MEETING

At the business meeting on March 20 we will consider the adjourned
question from our January meeting: whether the officers of the Federation should be
limited to two one-year terms of service.

It is proposed that the Constitution be amended to allow for three such
one-year terms, an issue that should be decided before our May nominating meeting. Please
consult your association leadership, if needed, and come prepared to vote on this
question.

ANNUAL BANQUET

We are very hopeful that Franklin Raines, Director of the White House
Office of Management and Budget, will be our banquet speaker next month. In addition to
his very significant overall governmental responsibilities, he has been the principal
player in negotiating White House policy with regard to the District.

His would be a particularly important message about how the White House
sees its relationship to the District in this critical election year and for the balance
of this Administration.

ANNUAL AWARDS

A very meaningful part of every annual banquet is the presentation of
awards to organizations (and even individuals) who have made significant contributions to
the welfare of the citizens of Washington, D. C.

These can be new organizations with great promise, or long established
entities working against the odds. Those that utilize resources prudently, that show high
ethical standards, that motivate others to better achievement are all worthy of special
recognition.

Please contact one of the Board members with your nominations as
quickly as possible so that the Board may consider them.

Trash-talking in sports events is decried by many, but when it comes to
talking real trash, some of our member organizations are doing really good things
for the District and its people.

Until recently, there were no prohibitions against private trash
haulers bringing the refuse from our neighboring states to poorly run facilities in the
District Not only did this trash create odors and vermin and blowing trash around nearby
houses and businesses, but the heavy trucks that bounced through the District's streets
only added to the burden of Public Works maintenance.

The League of 8000, in which Hillcrest, Penn Branch, and Dupont Circle
associations are keenly active, led the way in testimony before the National Capital
Planning Commission and before City Council that led to new regulations and to temporary
legislation that puts a moratorium on further trash facilities and establishes standards
for existing ones. The District, including the new management of ficer, have pledged that
the District-operated facilities are also brought up to a standard that protects the
health and welfare of its neighbors  and of the District's people as a whole.

Elections matter. Those two words cannot be said often enough. And
because they matter, the way in which each individual voter approaches the ballot matters.
Once in the not-too-distant past the biggest threat to democracy's elections was the
disenfranchisement of people because of their color, their economic status, or other
unconstitutional barriers.

Today  at least in the District  it may well be that the
pendulum has swung so far that the principal threat comes from persons who are not bona
fide voters but who seek access to the ballot and thus dilute the votes of legal
residents. That assertion was subscribed to by none other than the representative of the
American Civil Liberties Union al City Council hearings on March 2.

This dilution of valid votes is every bit as unconstitutional as
outright denial of access to the ballot. Pressure must be kept on the Board of Elections
and on the Council to assure that every avenue of illegal ballot access be blocked, with
the same fervor that the right of access for legitimate residents is protected. Given the
significance of this year's local elections, the administrative reviews and government
oversight cannot come too soon.

On to another front  Camille Barnett, the District's de facto City
Manager, comes to Washington with a huge management challenge laid before her, and with
political complexities that few others have been asked to assume. What's more, she is
being asked to achieve success under the glare of a national press corps that seems
fixated on prolonging the image of Washington, D. C., as a national scandal, a profligate
and undisciplined city, incapable of educating its young or protecting its fragile
elderly.

We wish her well. We will offer the hand of assistance to make sane
policies and program work, and to reform those that don't. And we will work, as well, to
help her understand just what a richly talented populace the District has.

We hope the dialog that begins next Friday will be a long and involved
one of benefit to all.

Many of you expressed interest in more internet information that can be of help to you
in your neighborhood activities, and this third installment focuses on more generalized
websites or those that provide comprehensive reviews of basic information.

Some of the "business" sites offer very useful demographic information that
can be helpful in analyzing community issues and in framing arguments about public policy
decisions.

Credit for most of the site information  and the list of books that are also very
useful references is to Barbara J. Saffir of The Washington Post. All websites begin with:
http://www.

Helpful Sites for Government Information

uncle-sam.com/unclesam The Great American Web Site previews information
available at sites; links users directly to the sites.

wings.gov/Federal/index.html This is WINGS, the Postal Service's
Web Interactive Network of Government Service. It searches by agency name or service.

access.gpo.gov/su_docs/gils/gils.html The Government Information
Locator Service searches agency sites by fields.

loc.gov This is not "local government," but the
Library of Congress. In addition to this repository of and links to federal information,
it links to wonderful resources such as the papers of the country's founder many
researchable treasures. ["Thomas," for those who are on a first name basis with
the LOC, is the name given to the website because Thomas Jefferson was the source of the
Library's core collection following the burning of the capital.]

ds.internic.net/ds/gov.html Internic allows you to search
government websites; it links to other search engines and the three branches of federal
government.

business.gov/Search_Online.html Called U. S. Business Advisor,
this is a searchable database designed by the University of Massachusetts Center for
Intelligent Information Retrieval.

lib.umich.edu/libhome/Documents.center/federal.html This was
created by the University of Michigan to allow searches and links to government and
private sources by subject.

law.vill.edu/ Fed-Agency/fedwebloc.html Villanova University's
Center for Information Law and Policy created this site for listing and searching
government servers.

Reference Books:

"Washington Online: How to Access the Federal Government on the Internet,"
Bruce Maxwell, Congressional Quarterly

"The Federal Internet Source," Tracy McLoone, National Journal

"The Great American Web Book: A Citizen's Guide to the Treasures of the U. S.
Government on the World Wide Web, Raphael Sagalyn and the staff of Inside Information,
Random House.

The unelected in seats of power  Who will comprise the Control Board at the end of 1998?

The expected changes in membership of the powerful Control Board were
recently chronicled by Washington Post editorial page writer Colbert King. The terms of
all five members are up this year.

King's lineup suggests at least four current members will not be
returning; his list of prospects for replacement members includes Scott Bolden, our
February speaker and the new head of the D. C. Chamber of Commerce ... Gladys Mack, deputy
at the United Planning Organization, vice chair of the Metro Board, and Marion Barry's
first budget director ...

More: Knighton Stanley, pastor of the Peoples Congregational
Church ... Bernard Anderson, assistantsecretary of labor and former chair
of the Philadelphia financial control board ... Pauline Schneider, bond counsel
(for the District, among many others), spoke to the Federation last year as cochair of the
D. C. Agenda project of the Federal City Council ... Julius Hobson Jr., AMA
lobbyist and former school board member.

Mentioned as well by King are: John Payton, Kendall Wilson, John
Ray, James Hudson, Dorothy Brizill, John Risher, Jerry Moore Jr., Michelle Bernard, and
Francine Trachtenberg.

King welcomes thoughts and recommendations at 334-6000 or by email to
kingc@washpost.com. And he recommends calling Eleanor Holmes Norton (225-8050) or Franklin
Raines (395-4840).

The meetings of the Federation Assembly for the program year
1997-1998 are shown below. They will all be at 7 p.m. at the Sumner School:

May 14
June 11

In April, we will return to the Officers Club at Fort McNair for our
annual banquet. Save the dates of April 9 and 10 (depending on speaker's schedule).

In addition, your Executive Board will meet each month to
consider Federation business, and should you have issues you would like presented for
consideration by the Federation, it would be most helpful if you contacted a Board member
in time for consideration at a Board meeting.

Board Meetings

March 24
April 28
May 20
June 23.

All Board meetings are at 1642 Thirty-fifth Street NW; they begin at 7 p.m.