I've been on Toonzone forums since around 10 years. When we come to some political discussions. They don't seem to accept a lot sites like ZeroHedge, Breitbart, SHTFplan, thinking there's conspiracy theories websites like Infowars while they have more readers then Huffington Post, NY Times, the mainstream media.

I got a message from "Zombie Chevrolet-Oldsmobile" (I changed the username like they do in changing names in the classic tv series Dragnet when they mention in that series it's to protect the innocents).

I quote the message I got in a warning.

Quote:

This is a poke to inform you that we've been getting complaints from other members about the links you keep posting to conspiracy websites in the US election thread. For starters, it discourages conversation when you keep replying to every other post with a link (and you've been poked about this behavior before). Secondly, regardless of whose side they support, are these links to good journalistic sources with credible reporting? Where are they getting their information? Would you be able to use this as a source in a scholarly writing? Think about that when you post a news piece.

If we have to remind you of this kind of behavior again, it will be a full warning.

I begin to wonder if Toonzone forums had been invaded by SJW(social justice warriors) or by using this not so correct term "liberals Archie Bunker"? By the term "liberal Archie Bunker", I refer to that episode of the classic tv sitcom "All in the family" when the open-minded Michael (Mike) Stivic (who's married to Edith's and Archie Bunker's daughter Gloria) titled "The games the Bunkers play" where open-minded liberal Mike act like Archie Bunker in this clip at 10:03 https://youtu.be/BB9PF7gFD78?t=10m3s

Btw, maybe I could invent a new term, how about SJABW for "Social Justice Archie Bunker Warriors" but it would be a miracle if it's catch and became viral like "Trigglypuff".

...Well... Readership numbers aren't always the same thing as perceived respectability. If you wanted to source-cite a conservative source which might be considered more news-like, perhaps you could go through FOX?

Also, it seems like the complaint isn't just about people being scared of the sources, but also about link-replying in general? Like, I know I find it a little intimidating if I'm trying to talk about stuff and every time I want to reply to someone, I have to go read whatever article or list of articles they've linked to, instead of just having an exchange of opinions and occasionally looking at a source document if they've made a claim that particularly needs backing up... sometimes people don't have time to go through a lot of articles, they just want to reply to a discussion and move on with their day.

I guess we hadn't completely realised, the mainsteam media had been probably caught pants down by people who refer to the "alt-media" (alternate media) with besides the websites already mentionned, some Youtube vloggers then I know like Doctor of Common Sense, Styxhexenhammer666, Tommy Sotomayor, Steven Crowder who posted avlog about media corruption, etc... and some might not like this competition and want to shut it down.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiTpW93Qey8

I guess I might check if the grass is really greener elsewhere like City-Data forums.

Unfortunately there's no Google/Bing cache of the discussion since the mention was erased and I couldn't archived to Archive.is
He mentionned what he think I was really. However the Youtube link then Rationalwiki mentionned had been deleted by that guy or by Youtube staff.

The weird thing about RationalWiki is when I read the talk page of the RationalWiki entry on Encyclopedia Dramatica. I linked it to an archived version on Archive.is http://archive.is/7YdTl And from what I read, RationalWiki had some hidden skeletons about the Armenian genocide and one more skeletons about pedophiles http://archive.is/muxbC but one guy could argue then Wikipedia might also have some similar skeletons so I don't go further about this.

Sorry for reviving this thread, I guess I fallen in the Twilight zone.

I mentionned earlier Styxhexenhammer666 in an earlier post and one TZ user nicknamed MGawd http://www.toonzone.net/forums/members/mdawg.182311/ MGawd mentionned a link on RationalWiki then that Youtube user was a Holocaust denial because I mentionned that guy and I liked some of his other videos.....

Apologies for the bump, I posted a message then I written to MDawg in late September.

Quote:

Sorry for my late post but I guess it might be better late than never. If you think then what I'm really are because of Styxwhatever. I posted the following to wondefly a couple of weeks ago and I thought it might be worth then I share with you.

There was some old posts on TZ forums wayback in time who mentionned Noam Chomsky. http://archive.is/AF6h2 (and some of these old posts are probably archived on Archive.is and the Wayback Machine) What's the link with that Youtube vlogger Styxwhatever? Almost 40 years ago, Noam Chomsky got his credibility hurt when he signed a petition in the Faurisson affair about a guy named Robert Faurisson who was a Holocaust denier. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faurisson_affair And a guy named Werner Cohn had once written a book titled "Partners in Hate: Noam Chomsky & the Holocaust deniers" who's available on Amazon.

Btw, should we put Valerie Plame in the same category as me? She posted a tweet, now deleted but archived on Archive.is and on the Wayback Machine, it goes as far then the Valerie Plame article had been chosen article of the day for Sept 23-24 on Encyclopedia Dramatica. http://archive.is/vOQnqhttps://archive.is/OFaGQ

Noam Chomsky and now Valerie Plame, I wonder if I might be now in good company?

I don't want to look into this too much but it seems like 2016 was the last gasp for racist, regressive, short-sighted backwater America. Hopefully we can say goodbye to the 1950s in 2018 (a very apt quote I found on Twitter).

A little bump, looks like they closed the topic on Toonzone but with the Al Franken debacle, here a meme as a gift to one SJW. Be warned then it's that photo of Al Franken who did the headlines and is now a internet meme.
https://imgflip.com/i/1zlqnj

Those SJWs treat the cyberspace as their own territory - first they claimed tumblr and Twitter, then DeviantART and YouTube, and their hunger for conquest seems insatiable.

You may also heard about an art site called "Storm-Artists.net" - it was formed by a Dutch SJW calling himself "avo" to rivalry dA. Avo found other crazy SJW henchmen as his admins:
- Patrick "Patty" Heddles from Australia
- Dawn "Subversive-Imaginati" McKenna
and couple more straight-people-haters to handle this site.

Used to have an account there until October 2014, when McKenna and her low-level SJW thugs bullied me out there, officially "because they couldn't stand pictures of anime-like catgirls with males (!) promoting cis-het values they oppose on Storm-Artists.net". When I tried handling appeal to avo, he replied me random words in botched English. But I don't regret being bullied out Storm-Artists, I had there even worse feedback than here.

Including LGBT characters/themes shouldn't be considered a political statement. People within the LGBT community are just people, not objects for anyone within the political spectrum to use for attention. The reason why more shows are using LGBT characters/themes now is because creators have more freedom than they did even just ten years ago.

I don't see how this prevents a show from being mindless fun. Just because other characters who aren't in a typical heterosexual orientation are in a show doesn't mean it can't be fun. It provides some much needed representation for a lot of people and it can potentially widen the appeal of a show by offering said representation. I don't see how this is a bad thing or even problematic.

Then I wonder if they aren't afraid then in a more long-term that might become a cliche like the car chase in the late 1970s as Cine-Massacre once mentionned. https://youtu.be/sz9-W_KW6n0?t=253

I think it was around the time of the second Amazing Spiderman movie when Garfield (Spiderman's actor) and some SJW Marvel *censored* on twitter wouldn't shut up about wanting Spiderman to be gay. And Stan was basically up against the wall in trying his damnedest to defend his creation, and after so much backlash it was expected. "Please folks, just leave me and my creation alone. I'll give you anything you want. Even a latin, non-binary, transrace, lgbtwiips4bbqwhatchamacallit superhero. Just leave me and my spidey-son alone." And yeah, harassing and bullying an old man (even after he's dead) because he doesn't want to bend over to your stupid diversity wokeness is so fucking classy.

Edit: Back to including LGBT in cartoons, I wonder if down the line in 10-20 years, someone might complained about how they are portrayed like that guy who complained about how Apu was portrayed in The Simpsons?