So you don't understand how averages work. Please learn to comprehend what people are saying before making yourself look like a moron. Also just because, 53 FPS was the minimum that was reached on their computer, presumably playing Battlefield 4. I think this adequately shows my understanding of minimums, at least in the case of this person playing Battlefield 4 on their computer.

So you don't understand how averages work. Please learn to comprehend what people are saying before making yourself look like a moron. Also just because, 53 FPS was the minimum that was reached on their computer, presumably playing Battlefield 4. I think this adequately shows my understanding of minimums, at least in the case of this person playing Battlefield 4 on their computer.

If you understood minimums, why would you bring averages into a discussion about minimums?

So you also lack reading comprehension? It was specifically stated that they averaged 60fps, even with a minimum of 53fps, not once was it claimed that it never dropped below 60fps

#23Snuckie7Posted 10/28/2013 11:55:21 PM

a687947 posted...

Snuckie7 posted...

a687947 posted...

Snuckie7 posted...

a687947 posted...

You don't get how averages work do you?

You don't get how minimums work do you?

So you don't understand how averages work. Please learn to comprehend what people are saying before making yourself look like a moron. Also just because, 53 FPS was the minimum that was reached on their computer, presumably playing Battlefield 4. I think this adequately shows my understanding of minimums, at least in the case of this person playing Battlefield 4 on their computer.

If you understood minimums, why would you bring averages into a discussion about minimums?

So you also lack reading comprehension? It was specifically stated that they averaged 60fps, even with a minimum of 53fps, not once was it claimed that it never dropped below 60fps

So you don't understand how averages work. Please learn to comprehend what people are saying before making yourself look like a moron. Also just because, 53 FPS was the minimum that was reached on their computer, presumably playing Battlefield 4. I think this adequately shows my understanding of minimums, at least in the case of this person playing Battlefield 4 on their computer.

If you understood minimums, why would you bring averages into a discussion about minimums?

So you also lack reading comprehension? It was specifically stated that they averaged 60fps, even with a minimum of 53fps, not once was it claimed that it never dropped below 60fps

And? That's a minimum of 53fps, which is below 60, which is what I said.

Well at least you know which number is lower, that's a start. Although it is completely irrelevant to what you originally replied to considering the 53fps was already stated. What exactly does that have to do with their computer averaging 60fps? Which was the point of their post.

#25Snuckie7Posted 10/29/2013 12:15:29 AM

a687947 posted...

Snuckie7 posted...

And? That's a minimum of 53fps, which is below 60, which is what I said.

Well at least you know which number is lower, that's a start. Although it is completely irrelevant to what you originally replied to considering the 53fps was already stated. What exactly does that have to do with their computer averaging 60fps? Which was the point of their post.

Irrelevant to what I replied to? Maybe you should work on that reading comprehension a bit, or did you miss this line?