Two-year budget deal struck: what you need to know

House and Senate negotiators reached a budget deal that would fund the
federal government for two fiscal years. It’s modest, but a step back
from fiscal brinkmanship — if it passes.

By Francine Kiefer

WASHINGTON — House and Senate budget negotiators in Washington have
reached a deal to fund the federal government and avoid a government
shutdown on Jan. 15. It comes after much fiscal turbulence, including
the first government shutdown in 17 years in October.
Here are the basics:
Q. Does this mean the budget drama is over?
A. If the House and Senate approve of the deal, which was hammered out
by budget negotiators
Rep. Paul Ryan (R) of Wisconsin and Sen. Patty Murray (D) of
Washington, the government will be funded for the next two fiscal
years. That means a reprieve from budget brinkmanship — and shutdown.
But another fiscal landmine could explode. The United States will hit
its debt ceiling in the first half of next year. If lawmakers refuse
to raise the ceiling, the U.S. could face the possibility of
defaulting on its debt — sending economic shockwaves around the world.
Q. This is a relatively small deal. So why is it important?
A. This agreement is more important for its politics than for its
numbers. The compromise is indeed small, funding the government at
$1.012 trillion annually — about halfway between the Senate budget of
$1.058 trillion and the House budget of $967 trillion. It softens the
automatic spending cuts, known as the “sequester,” by only $63
billion, but doesn’t get rid of it. It splits the sequester relief
evenly between the Pentagon and nondefense programs.
Its significance is that there is a deal at all. The House and Senate
have not been able to agree on a budget since 2009. The haggling,
brinkmanship, and uncertainty, not to mention the October government
shutdown, have had a drag effect on the economy, tarnished America’s
reputation overseas, and fed the partisanship that has Americans now
so disgusted with Congress.
“It’s a good step in the right direction that can hopefully rebuild
some trust and serve as a foundation for continued bipartisan work,”
said Senate Budget Chairman Murray in a statement.
Q. You said it’s a small deal. What’s missing?
A. This is no “grand bargain.” It does not trade tax increases — as
Democrats want — for significant cuts to the expensive programs that
drive long-term debt, such as Medicare and Social Security. That’s
what Republicans wanted. In fact, it doesn’t really deal with
long-term debt at all. What it does do is put a small dent in the
deficit, reducing it by between $20 billion and $30 billion.
Q. Given the polarization in Washington, how was it possible to reach
this agreement?
A. It’s precisely because its scope is so narrow that Ryan and Murray
were able to come to agreement. They knew they would not be able to
get their respective caucuses to agree to the big stuff, or even what
some consider medium stuff — such as closing corporate tax loopholes
or using a less costly method of figuring Social Security checks.
The other reason they could agree is because they were out were the
ones working it out. They may be ideological opposites, but they are
both highly pragmatic. And they adhered to that warning about too many
cooks in the kitchen spoiling the broth. This was a Ryan-Murray
creation, which certainly makes it easier to actually put a deal on
the table.
Q. What happens next?
A. The House is expected to take up the agreement, called the
Bipartisan Budget Act, before its recesses for the Christmas holiday
on Friday. Then it’s the Senate’s turn. But it’s still not certain
that the bill will pass both houses. Democrats will be upset that the
deal does not include an extension of jobless benefits, set to expire
later this month. Conservatives will be upset that the full sequester
is not in force, and that a more serious attempt at debt reduction was
not made.
Some conservatives have already begun lining up against the deal.
Influential Tea Party leader Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R) of Kansas said on
CNN’s “Crossfire” Tuesday that he will not vote for it. That means
House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio might need to rely on
Democratic votes to get the deal through the House — something he has
been reluctant to do in the past.
But Ryan said the deal “reduces the deficit — without raising taxes.”
It is a “firm step in the right direction.” In Washington, where it is
so difficult to put a foot forward, one step can seem like a giant
leap.

Donations

LasVegasTribune.com has a handful of honest hardworking editors and researchers. We are working diligently to bring you the truth no matter the cost. We have no membership fees and have no plans for it in the future. We rely on the compassion and dedication of our faithful volunteers and donations from our loyal readers.

Please donate as much as you feel comfortable. We have multiple donation values for your convenience as well as donation you can enter your own value.

We thank you for your support, and please only donate what you can afford.