The Fall of Hillary Clinton

On 9/11/2016, Hillary Clinton collapsed at free-fall speed into her own footprint, after making an early exit from a 9/11 commemoration in New York City. At first the Clinton campaign said she was overcome by the heat. But I am sure that at least 88 scientists can be found to sign a statement that temperatures in the 70s, a gentle breeze, and low humidity are not sufficient to cause knees to buckle.

Obviously, her entourage has seen this kind of stuff before, for instead of rushing her to the hospital, they whisked her off to her daughter Chelsea’s multi-million dollar Manhattan apartment. Later in the day, she emerged saying she felt great. And Clinton’s doctor claimed that she had been diagnosed on Friday with pneumonia.

Oh what a tangled web.

Those of us who follow politics have long been convinced that Hillary Clinton is hiding severe health problems that would disqualify her from being president in the eyes of most Americans. The alarming seizures, the persistent coughing fits, her need for help up stairs, her long “bathroom” break during a debate, her rare public appearances, her general low energy, and now this all point to something seriously wrong. The politically informed also have known for a long time that Hillary Clinton is too dishonest, selfish, and corrupt to be trusted with the presidency.

The reason that both of these truths are not widely known and accepted is simple: the Democrats and their allies in the media do not want them to be known. And to form dissenting opinions, one must draw independent inferences from large numbers of facts observed over a long period of time, something that exceeds the knowledge base, attention spans, and reasoning skills of the average voter.

But now — praise Kek and his anointed one, the God Emperor — none of this matters, for the normies have undeniable visual proof of both theses. We can now see that Hillary is a sick woman. We can now see that she and her campaign have been lying about her health problems. And, we now know that these lies are not an aberration, but standard procedure — not the last resort but the first — because the campaign compounded them with two more lies: first the claim that Hillary was overcome by heat, then the claim that she was diagnosed with pneumonia on Friday.

Why does the pneumonia diagnosis ring false, aside from the Clinton campaign’s long track record of lies? Pneumonia would certainly explain Hillary’s cough. But Hillary has been coughing for months. And it is not possible that she has been walking around for months with undiagnosed pneumonia. Besides, didn’t she claim during a coughing fit in Ohio that she was suffering from allergies? (The Clintons resort to lying so quickly that they don’t even bother making them consistent.)

But Hillary is damned if she really does have pneumonia too. The doctors, of course, have not said what kind of pneumonia Hillary has, but if it is one of the contagious varieties, it would be incredibly callous, selfish, and irresponsible for Hillary to expose other people. More than 50,000 Americans die every year of influenza and pneumonia, most of them children, old people, and people with compromised immune systems. But Hillary Clinton has piled up mountains of corpses in Libya and Syria alone. So what’s a few more deaths to slake her ambition?

But presumably, among those exposed to Hillary’s pneumonia are her two small grandchildren, born in 2014 and in June of this year, making both of them especially vulnerable. Were the babies in Chelsea’s apartment when Hillary turned up after her fainting spell? Would Chelsea have let her mother in if she really had pneumonia? Anything is possible, I suppose, given that we are dealing with sociopaths.

One of the clearest signs of America’s decline is that there are no people who can say “no” to reckless ambition and folly. There is nobody looking out for the common good of America, because in an increasingly multicultural society, we have nothing in common, much less a common political good.

But even within our leading political parties, there are no “elders” looking out for their long-term interests. There were no Republicans willing to say “no” to Ted Cruz’s candidacy, even though he is not a natural born citizen and thus not qualified to run for president in the first place. And there were no Democrats willing to say “no” to Hillary Clinton, even though she is a spectacularly corrupt and incompetent candidate. And if her past record did not disqualify her, gaming and cheating Bernie Sanders out of the nomination really should have.

But the Democratic Party, like America as a whole, is in deep decline. How else could the political vehicle of the Eastern liberal establishment, surely one the most formidable oligarchies the world has ever known, fall into the hands of a criminal gang led by a white trash grifter from Arkansas?

But in a sick society like ours, enough is never enough. Americans have been programmed with a profoundly self-destructive ideology, liberals especially. They will keep squeaking about Hillary’s vagina, dem programs, and the transcendent need to stop the hated fascist Trump and humiliate his deplorable white trash followers, until — like a pack of lemmings — they plunge to their doom. Unfortunately, they have the power to carry the rest of us with them.

The Bill Clinton machine — and make no mistake, this is Bill Clinton’s grab for a third term in the White House — is so criminally selfish, criminally reckless, and just plain criminal that they would prop up Hillary’s corpse like El Cid and hope that it leads them to victory rather than admit defeat like honorable men.

The only people who can say “no” to this insanity now are the voters, by electing Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton’s downfall is white America’s rise. Just watch.

It’s terrific that concerns about her health have finally gained traction, and it does seem hat this has the potential to knock off a few hundred thousand voters. And HRC would be disastrously successful in implementing policies destructive to Whites, so I would like to see her kept away from the White House at all costs. With that said, she is also a particularly weak candidate; if the Democrats were to draft Sanders at this point, I’d say that we might as well put a fork in Trump’s campaign.

Last night there was a neurology resident on 4chan’s /pol/, and one other Dr in a thread there. (Too bad /pol/’s threads don’t last.) But I posted this link below, and the main, resident saw it and made some negative technical comment then retracted it. Before reading / watching this (ie independently) he’d said it was either sub-cortical vascular dementia or Lewy Syndrome. He also said that Parkinson’s would be too ‘lite’ for her symptoms.

Anyway, here’s the link which says sub-cortical vascular dementia; it includes an easy-watching video version, I think it’s the same or at least similar to the text.

Classic signs/symptoms of Parkinson Disease include the tetrad of resting tremor, muscular rigidity, slow movements, and a “masked” face (heavily blunted facial expressions). She doesn’t seem to demonstrate any of these signs, apart from being perpetually cross in an unfortunate self-parody. Lewy Body dementia tends to present with appreciable dementia (hence the name), and I don’t really see signs of that with Clinton either. (Disclaimer: I haven’t watched any videos touted as proof thereof.)

Vascular dementia is a definite possibility, especially in light of her history of venous sinus thrombosis.

Good one. Fall is the time for culling the herd because you cannot afford to feed them all during winter. Cut the barley, etc, etc. The leaf falling from the branch. I was thinking of her falling/failing health and her lies that fail to convince. Lots of associations here.

Well, there is a new video out cooncerning Crooked Hillary the Sick Evil Mad Downer Cow by the Les Deplorables Doctors of Veternarian Medicine at the 9-11 Holocaust Hamburger Mill & Museum. Crooked Hillary the Sick Evil Mad Downer Cow is running for “Quean of the Herd”. This is a short YOUTUBE video with the following notes:

Crooked Hillary the Evil Sick Mad Cow just got out from a Goldman-Sachs fundraiser when she collapsed suddenly at the 9-11 Hamburger Holocaust Hamburger Mill. Her eyes rolled about and she drooled. Bill the Old Bull with Bangs was banging Monica the jew heifer. Trump the Pure-Bred MAGA-Orange Bull was studding some Eastern European heifers who throw strong calves. This incident was filmed by Les Deplorables Doctors of Veternarian Medicine. Crooked Hillary the Mad Downer Cow does NOT approve of this message.

This was the tipping point. Dave Weigel of WaPo just tweeted a snippet from an Economist editorial. “[H]er affliction might seem to have vindicated Mr. Trump and his fellow conspirators… Yet millions of Americans, livid with Mrs. Clinton and the establishment politics she represents…”

That was awesome, Greg. I have to admit, I’ve been enjoying the freak show that is the Clinton campaign and the MSM’s coverage of it. I find it amusing that Hillary’s demise comes straight after her Alt-Right speech and attack on deplorable Trump voters. Clearly, this is what happens when you try to take on the Alt-Right.

Indeed. What still puzzles me, even though we witness it more and more often, is the apparent lack of foresight on the part of these people. We sometimes think of them as diabolical grand strategists, spinning an evil web of deceit that most people wouldn’t even be able to conceive. And yet, more and more, they fuck it up. They have the money. They have the people. They have the media. They have the power of coercion and increasingly the law. And they STILL manage to fuck it up, in the most incredible ways.

“The Clintons resort to lying so quickly that they don’t even bother making them consistent.”

Well, exactly, but what is this? To me, it looks like a mixture of staggering hybris, the disconnect from reality typical of these false elites, and simple carelessness, perhaps due to increased pressure. But that begs the question: how did such incompetent people manage to gain their power in the first place?

I think it has a lot to do with what Anonymous Conservative would describe as r-selection. In a context of next to free resources (100% free for the likes of the Clintons), everything goes. You don’t need such things as trust, honor, loyalty, accountability, or even basic consistency. You can do without them, and still survive. Even thrive. So the reason such a “spectacularly corrupt and incompetent” woman has been able to reach her current position, I think, is simply that she represents a great part of western society. The number of people who are themselves, in different ways, corrupt and incompetent is big enough that we have one running for president, in a way, precisely because she is SPECTACULARLY so. Even the wretched must have their champions. Even the twisted must have their kings and queens. And in kali-yuga, the wretched and twisted are so many, their representatives end up in the palaces of power.

What you say could also apply to Mr. Trump, namely, that popular presidential candidates reflect large portions of the general population. So many of our people believe he is utterly sincere, but I don’t.

Yes, his candidacy serves a purpose, i.e., making race, immigration, etc. a less disrespectable topic for public discussion whereby we get our toe in the door – but that’s it. Trump wants to increase the size of US military (what – it’s not big enough?) and then go into the Middle East to clean house (get rid of ISIS) as per his speech in Baltimore. This is the thinking of a fool. It will be another Viet Nam.

He has not uttered one word about tossing the Federal Reserve. His only criticism of that ghastly institution is their interest rate decisions. Like saying the only problem with a 400-pound diabetic is his greasy hair.

I’m not the one claiming that Trump will have an interventionist policy in the M.E. He himself said that he wants the US armed forces to go in there and get rid of ISIS once and for all. All easy peasy, you know, like spring cleaning your house. He has vowed to destroy the Islamic State (ISIS) and has promised to “bomb the hell out of ISIS”.

He wants sanctions against Iran. Sounds like interventionism to me.

Why wouldn’t the neocons love him?

Ron Paul’s failed candidacy had nothing to do with his anti-Fed policy. As if that was the only plank in his platform.

The major flaw in a Trump presidency, as far as all of us are concerned, is that he’s malleable in anything beyond self-presentation. And matters of real estate, I guess.

If a President isn’t well-informed about world politics he’s going to be a puppet for savvier types (cf. Bush / Cheney). Business meetings and a few mumbled pleasantries in a foreign language don’t make a politician. Which just means he’d probably step out of the way when the hawks go hunting.

Worse: that’s pretty much what anyone has to do at this point. Let some shill from Halliburton or BAE or the Council on Foreign Relations (“I like Richard Haass”) bend his ear about securing this or that in whateveristan, and he’ll posture, make believe he gets it, but roll over because he probably doesn’t. Hillary’s one virtue is – or would have been – that she *is* the hawk, so the ritual would have been streamlined.

Stronza’s contention was far from foolish. Today, the Trump campaign announced that former CIA director R. James Woolsey was joining the campaign as a national security advisor. Not only is Woolsey a self-described “neo-con” but back in 2002 he blamed Iran for the 9/11 attacks and has been pushing for war with Iran for more than a decade.

He also describes himself as the “Presbyterian wing of the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs” and has made numerous public statements affirming his commitment to Jews and Israel.

Trump himself has spent the entire Obama administration essentially reading from a Likud written script about Iran. He has taken the side of Netanyahu against not only the Obama administration but the defense establishment which has been pushing for peeling Iran away from Russia’s orbit.

Trump’s dedication to Israel is far more consistent than his dedication to stopping illegal immigration, which he said nothing about for his entire career, until his famous Presidential announcement.

All things considered he seems obviously preferable to Clinton but the idea that Donald Trump is “sincere” about any substantive issue seems like wishful thinking that certainly has no basis in his actions for the last ten or twenty years.

But, to address “whatgives?” point, Trump has in fact been consistent on the trade issue for at least 20 years now and has a long catalog of public statements saying so. Illegal immigration, not at all

Trump may have several faults, but I cant help imagine what the election would have been like without him. Hillarys downfall would not become the rise of white America if Jeb Bush was the republican candidate… just imagine, there would just be a replica of the Clinton campaign. I am so happy Trump disrupted their show. He could just the same had made the decision not to run.

True, but does that make him a fool, or just a shrewd salesman? This isn’t politics yet, exactly; it’s marketing. Do you think he could instill as much hope and excitement in people if he were talking about the Federal Reserve (we are sick and bankrupt guys, and it’s the Jews’ fault…yep), rather than affirming uncompromising strength in the face of an enemy the left doesn’t even dare to name? If he has proven anything, it’s that unlike the ones we now call cuckservatives, he is actually playing to WIN.

Is he sincere in everything he says? Well no, and if he were, he wouldn’t stand a chance in hell. But is he sincere about wanting to make America a better place for “Americans”? I don’t know, but I can give him the benefit of the doubt.
MAYBE Trump does what he does with the common good as a goal. Including lying. This is democracy. The percentage of people that can understand and stomach the truth is just too small to get anyone elected.

Watch a couple of videos of interviews of Trump’s from years past. There’s one on youtube from 1986 (I think) and several others. He’s had the same concerns for decades. He may not be able to do the job, but I don’t doubt his sincerity.

I wonder if there is a tipping point when the house of cards that is the Clinton crime machine will come crashing down? Christopher Hitchens did write a book about old Slick Willie with the sub-title “no-one left to lie to”.

On Hillary Clinton – are the norms going to believe the evidence of their own eyes or the crap of the MSM?