Any ideas about a good 1080p to 720p converter that is able to convert a video of 90 minutes in less than several hours? (maybe like in 2, 3 or 4 hours ;-)
The compression of a file is H.264/MPEG-4 AVC.

Questions on Super User are expected to relate to computer software or computer hardware within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

3 Answers
3

If you want to stay with H.264, you'll probably want to go with x264 as encoder. It's built into many applications, but most prominently FFmpeg with the "libx264" codec, or Handbrake.

x264 has a reputation of being fast and efficient. The speed can be tuned by presets that are called, for example, "fast". They range from "ultrafast" to "veryslow". You can check x264's help by calling x264 --fullhelp, which will explain all the options for the presets.

Here are the flags for "ultrafast". They disable some advanced encoding functions that require processing time. Encoding in "ultrafast" mode will not be as efficient in terms of bits used, and with a fixed bit rate, you'll lose some quality. But generally, it shouldn't matter as much.

Is it gonna take longer if the source file is on a DVD comparing to having it on my hard disk?
–
Einsteins GrandsonJan 22 '12 at 2:08

Yes, most probably. However, if you already have the DVD ripped to h.264, note that re-encoding from an already encoded file might result in noticeable quality loss. You'd have to set the RF (rate factor) accordingly (e.g. lower = better) to compensate. In this case, ripping from DVD again will probably leave you with better quality. It's always a tradeoff between speed and quality.
–
slhck♦Jan 22 '12 at 2:11

I don't have a problem with loosing the quality and it's not a normal DVD... It was a 1080p file that was burned on a DVD...
–
Einsteins GrandsonJan 22 '12 at 2:15

I see. In this case, hard disk read speeds are of course faster.
–
slhck♦Jan 22 '12 at 2:17

The quality you'll get from a GPU based encoder is nowhere near what x264 can deliver (sometimes destroying frames completely). However, if you're using the fastest settings you can configure for x264, it might be worth comparing those results.