"The highest as the lowest form of criticism is a mode of autobiography."
-- Oscar Wilde

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Grand Opera: The Story of the Met, by Charles Affron and Mirella Jona Affron

Jade Sphinx readers receiving the latest
dispatches from the Culture Wars are well-aware of the current controversial
season at the New York Metropolitan
Opera. However, it seems that the
Met is no stranger to controversy, as I learned from Grand Opera: The Story of the Met, the first new history of the
organization in 30 years. In Grand Opera, authors Charles Affronand Mirella Jona Affron trace the story of the Met through
its opening night of Faust to the
recent controversial production of Wagner’s Ring, illustrating their story with previously unpublished
anecdotes about the temperamental divas, driven directors, chorus members, and
sometimes-striking orchestras that made it a world-class institution.

When tackling
a subject as immense as the history of a cultural institution that has loomed
large on the American intellectual and aesthetic landscape for more than 100
years, the question should be – how to proceed?
Would such a study focus on the administration of various General
Managers? On performances, particularly of
operatic stars here in the US and abroad?
Touch upon the influence of wealthy patrons and the role of elite society
on the institution? Or, is it really a
question of how world affairs impacted so cosmopolitan an organization?

Surprisingly,
the Affrons manage to tackle all of these questions and more in Grand Opera. As such, Grand Opera is not only the story of
the Met, but a de facto history of US aesthetic and cultural aspirations as the
nation became a major global voice within the fine arts. Reading through the book we see an emergent
superpower finding its way in a traditionally European milieu, and through it,
addressing particularly American concerns.

For instance,
the Affrons shine in a lucid and eloquent passage on the Met and its
integration of African-Americans into the Metropolitan family. That such machinations on behalf of General
Manager Rudolf Bing were necessary
only some 50 years ago is sobering. As
the Affrons remind us:

In the southern cities of its 1961
spring tour, the Met was caught up in the fight for civil rights that defined
the decade. During the Atlanta run, two African-American holders of orchestra
tickets were asked to sit elsewhere. They refused. Protests ensued. The Student
Non-Violent Coordinating Committee and the Southern Christian Leadership
Conference joined in a telegram to Bing denouncing the company’s acceptance of
a discriminatory policy: “The SCLC regrets sincerely that the famed
Metropolitan Opera Company has allowed itself to be dictated to by the whim and
caprice of so-called ‘southern custom,’ at such a critical moment in history,
particularly this community.” The text was cosigned by Martin Luther King Jr.
Bing’s reply was published in the Times the next day. The Met, he wrote
defensively, “does not allow itself to be dictated to by anyone. . . . We have
nothing whatsoever to do with the local arrangements.” But the following year,
officially at least, the Atlanta audience was integrated. Atlanta was again a
thorn in Bing’s side in 1964. The organizers had balked at the prospect of
Leontyne Price in Don Giovanni. Bing dashed off this memorandum to Anthony
Bliss, president of the Metropolitan Opera Association: “Leontyne Price at the
present time is one of the most valuable properties [an unfortunate choice of
words] of the Metropolitan Opera and there is no doubt that taking her on tour
next season, but skipping the whole Atlanta week would terribly upset her,
would without question make her refuse the whole tour and might, indeed,
jeopardize her whole relationship with the Metropolitan.” Price sang Donna Anna
in Atlanta that spring.

It would
seem that navigating shifting political currents is a necessary skill for any
General Manager of the Met; the chapters devoted to the Met during World War II,
for example, are a masterful summary of stewardship during a global conflict
impacting on artists, composers, musicians, donors and patrons.

And here,
really, is the nubbin of the book: the
Metropolitan Opera is not simply, and reductively, an organization that puts on
musical shows. Rather, it is a
collective of world-class artists – singers, dancers, composers, musicians and designers
– working with a far-reaching administrative wing navigating global events, New
York society and a querulous donor base.
Grand Opera provides a splendid illustration of the massive, complex and
multiform undertaking that is the New York Metropolitan Opera that can be read
with satisfaction by opera fans, cultural historians and New York history
buffs. It is highly recommended and available
from Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and your local bookseller.

For readers
who cannot get enough opera, Charles Affron also blogs about the Met at
OperaPost, which you can visit here: http://operapost.blogspot.com/. It is a site both informative and
entertaining.

No comments:

James Abbott

James Abbott is a California-based writer and arts advocate. His online column The Jade Sphinx (http://thejadesphinx.blogspot.com/) champions the Fine Arts, featuring stories on such concepts as recognizable quality, artistic heritage and tradition, and techniques of the Great Masters.