I, MOHAMED BENNOUNA, Judgeof the International Tribunal for
the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International
Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia Since 1991 ("the
International Tribunal"),

HAVING BEEN APPOINTED as pre-appeal Judge in this matter by virtue of
an order of the Appeals Chamber dated 16 May 2000,

BEING SEISED of a "Motion for Extension of Time to File
Respondents Brief of the Prosecution" filed by the Office of the Prosecutor
("the Prosecution") on 19 July 2000, in which an extension of the time-limit for
the filing of the Prosecutions Brief in response to the Appellants Briefs
filed by the convicted persons until 4 October 2000 is sought, based upon reasons, inter
alia, in relation to the extensive nature of the Appellants Briefs, and the time
needed to address them properly ("the Prosecutions Motion"),

BEING SEISED of a "Motion for Extension of Time to File
Respondents Brief of the Defence" filed by Drago Josipovic and Vladimir Santic
on 21 July 2000, in which the Appellants request an extension of time to file their Briefs
in response to the Prosecutions Appellants Brief until 4 October 2000, based
upon reasons in relation to, inter alia, the complexity of the issues raised in the
Prosecutions Appellants Brief ("the Appellants Motion"),

NOTING the "Prosecutions Response to Motion for Extension
of Time to File Respondents Brief" filed by the Prosecution on 27 July 2000,

NOTING that the Appellants Briefs filed by Zoran Kupreskic,
Mirjan Kupreskic, Drago Josipovic, and Vladimir Santic are not accompanied by the relevant
authorities, as required by Rule 111 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence ("the
Rules"),

CONSIDERING that Rule 127 of the Rules provides that the Appeals
Chamber may on good cause being shown enlarge or reduce any time prescribed by the Rules,

CONSIDERING that the argument in relation to the extensiveness of the
Appellants Briefs and the complexity of the issues raised, submitted in support of
the Prosecutions Motion and of the Appellants Motion, constitutes good cause
for extending the time-limit for the filing of the Respondents Briefs,

CONSIDERING that the requested extension of time would also be
consistent with the time-limits set out in relation to Vlatko Kupreskic, and would thus
not result in a delay of the proceedings,

CONSIDERING further that the status of the documents attached to the
Appellants Briefs filed by Zoran Kupreskic, Mirjan Kupreskic, Drago Josipovic, and
Vladimir Santic should be clarified as soon as possible,

HEREBY GRANT the Prosecutions Motion andthe
Appellants Motion and ORDER as follows:

(1) the time-limit for the filing of the Respondents Briefs of all
parties under Rule 112 shall be extended until 4 October 2000,

(2) the Appellants Zoran Kupreskic, Mirjan Kupreskic, Drago Josipovic, and
Vladimir Santic shall file the relevant authorities in support of the arguments presented
in their Appellants Briefs by 4 September 2000,

(3) the Appellants Zoran Kupreskic, Mirjan Kupreskic, Drago Josipovic, and
Vladimir Santic shall file by 4 September 2000 a document providing an index of the
documents attached to their Appellants Briefs, clearly specifying in respect of each
document whether it was before the Trial Chamber or not; in the event some of the
documents were not presented at trial, the above-mentioned Appellants shall file a Motion
for additional evidence pursuant to Rule 115 by 4 September 2000.

Done in both English and French, the English text being authoritative.