Number prefixes

Poll standings

Systems

[ ] conforms to ANS Forth.
SwiftForth, SwiftX (Leon Wagner)
iForth (Marcel Hendrix)
Gforth
Win32Forth 6.xx, STC version 0.02
[ ] already implements the proposal in full since release [ ].
Win32Forth 6.xx, STC version 0.02
iForth 3.0
[ ] implements the proposal in full in a development version.
Gforth
Win32Forth
4p (Helmar)
[ ] will implement the proposal in full in release [ ].
4p 1.2
[ ] will implement the proposal in full in some future release.
SwiftForth, SwiftX (Leon Wagner)
kForth (will not support double-cell entry)
There are no plans to implement the proposal in full in [ ].
[ ] will never implement the proposal in full.
4th (Hans Bezemer)

Programmers

[ ] I have used (parts of) this proposal in my programs:
Leon Wagner
George Hubert
Marcel Hendrix
Anton Ertl
Alex McDonald
[ ] I would use (parts of) this proposal in my programs if the systems
I am interested in implemented it:
Leon Wagner
Marcel Hendrix
[ ] I would use (parts of) this proposal in my programs if this
proposal was in the Forth standard:
Leon Wagner
Marcel Hendrix
[ ] I would not use (parts of) this proposal in my programs.
Hanz Bezemer
Andrew Haley

Informal results

iForth currently does not support lower-case hex digits.

4p passes the core and core-ext testers, but is not yet 100% ANS
Forth conformant.

Fill out the appropriate ballot(s) below and mail it/them to me
<anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>. Your vote will be published
(including your name (without email address) and/or the name of your
system) here. You can vote (or change your vote) at any time by
mailing to me, and the results will be published here.

Note that you can be both a system implementor and a programmer, so
you can submit both kinds of ballots.

Ballot for systems

If you maintain several systems, please mention the systems separately
in the ballot. Insert the system name or version between the brackets
or in the line below the statement. Multiple hits for the same system
are possible (if they do not conflict).

[ ] conforms to ANS Forth.
[ ] already implements the proposal in full since release [ ].
[ ] implements the proposal in full in a development version.
[ ] will implement the proposal in full in release [ ].
[ ] will implement the proposal in full in some future release.
There are no plans to implement the proposal in full in [ ].
[ ] will never implement the proposal in full.

If you want to provide information on partial implementation, please
do so informally, and I will aggregate this information in some way.

Ballot for programmers

Just mark the statements that are correct for you (e.g., by putting an
"x" between the brackets). If some statements are true for some of
your programs, but not others, please mark the statements for the
dominating class of programs you write.

[ ] I have used (parts of) this proposal in my programs.
[ ] I would use (parts of) this proposal in my programs if the systems
I am interested in implemented it.
[ ] I would use (parts of) this proposal in my programs if this
proposal was in the Forth standard.
[ ] I would not use (parts of) this proposal in my programs.

If you feel that there is closely related functionality missing from
the proposal (especially if you have used that in your programs), make
an informal comment, and I will collect these, too. Note that the
best time to voice such issues is the RfD stage.
Anton Ertl