SirDigbyChickenCaesar:tonguedepressor: I will give you $100.00 cash money to eat a 12" stalk of celery from that naked woman's bum while I film it.

Is it just laying on the crack like a horrible ants-on-the-log or actually like inserted? You will have to add a zero for one of them....

If you're a member of my target audience you'll recognize the need for it to be inserted and by being a member of my target audience will also recognize my $100 more as a finders fee than as a paid service.

i think it's so stupid when i see these young adults who are covered in them and expect me to be impressed. tats are ugly to me. i would never even consider getting one. it makes me laugh when i hear people say that they got theirs to define who they are personally. hahaha, are you kidding me? how can they be individuals when they are the very definition of conformity? EVERYONE nowadays, seems to have them. i have noticed also that many people who have them want people to be scared of them. why?

why should i be scared of you? what,because you're a nut case with poor impulse control? it's like ok i get it; you have a lot of tattoos. i get it,you like wasting your money. i get it,you have a disposable income. why don't these people really try to be different? whenever they do get 'em,their tats are ALWAYS--- THE SAME!

hey look at me, i have a tribal tat. yeah, you and 47 million others.what's your point?you wanna impress me? don't get one! tats are almost always associated with people who make bad choices in life. some of these choices affect only them,but unfortunately, most of their choices negatively impact innocent people's lives. like gangs-for instance;they are always covered in them.

tonguedepressor:SirDigbyChickenCaesar: tonguedepressor: I will give you $100.00 cash money to eat a 12" stalk of celery from that naked woman's bum while I film it.

Is it just laying on the crack like a horrible ants-on-the-log or actually like inserted? You will have to add a zero for one of them....

If you're a member of my target audience you'll recognize the need for it to be inserted and by being a member of my target audience will also recognize my $100 more as a finders fee than as a paid service.

I just watched that film a few months back, for the first time. I thought Rod Steiger did a good job playing the illustrated man, but overall, the film didn't really work very well. But, being that it was based on Ray Bradbury, I was still entertained.

The photograph illustrates what is wrong with journalism today: Tat is at least a few weeks old (it's healed), gun is dry and there is no cord attached. I realize that it is not highly important, but come on. To hell with accurate reporting. Slippery slope and all that.

I just watched that film a few months back, for the first time. I thought Rod Steiger did a good job playing the illustrated man, but overall, the film didn't really work very well. But, being that it was based on Ray Bradbury, I was still entertained.

Back in the day, under the influence, you'd have thought it was a masterpiece. Unfortunately very little manages to hold up for that many years and the fact that it was Bradbury is probably the only reason anyone would watch it today.

tonguedepressor:tonguedepressor: SirDigbyChickenCaesar: tonguedepressor: I will give you $100.00 cash money to eat a 12" stalk of celery from that naked woman's bum while I film it.

Is it just laying on the crack like a horrible ants-on-the-log or actually like inserted? You will have to add a zero for one of them....

If you're a member of my target audience you'll recognize the need for it to be inserted and by being a member of my target audience will also recognize my $100 more as a finders fee than as a paid service.

skinink:i think it's so stupid when i see these young adults who are covered in them and expect me to be impressed. tats are ugly to me. i would never even consider getting one. it makes me laugh when i hear people say that they got theirs to define who they are personally. hahaha, are you kidding me? how can they be individuals when they are the very definition of conformity? EVERYONE nowadays, seems to have them. i have noticed also that many people who have them want people to be scared of them. why?why should i be scared of you? what,because you're a nut case with poor impulse control? it's like ok i get it; you have a lot of tattoos. i get it,you like wasting your money. i get it,you have a disposable income. why don't these people really try to be different? whenever they do get 'em,their tats are ALWAYS--- THE SAME! hey look at me, i have a tribal tat. yeah, you and 47 million others.what's your point?you wanna impress me? don't get one! tats are almost always associated with people who make bad choices in life. some of these choices affect only them,but unfortunately, most of their choices negatively impact innocent people's lives. like gangs-for instance;they are always covered in them.

Well, sure, I guess. Tattoos used to have an aura about them, like you shouldn't fark with the person who had them. Members of the armed forces, gangs, convicts, people like that, but now they're too mainstream, like teenagers get them because just getting a piercing won't piss daddy/mummy off enough on its own.