Trump administration not acting like fags for once

Military should focus on combat not gender politics Ever since James Mattis was appointed by President Donald Trump as defense secretary, he has made no secret of his commitment to maintain and improve the effectiveness and caliber of the United States military.“I’m not subtle,” Mattis told GOP lawmakers earlier this year. “I need to make the military more lethal.”According to a report from The Washington Times, the United States Army just took a huge step to ensure that its soldiers will continue to be the most effective and powerful force on Earth.In what is a major shift from the Obama administration era, fighting and battlefield skills will now take priority over social justice issues like transitioning transgender troops.In service-wide memorandums obtained by The Washington Times, military leaders are making optional what used to be mandatory training on transgender transition, drug abuse and other issues.The memorandums were approved by both Army Secretary Mark Esper and Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley.“The move, Army leaders argue, is designed to relieve stress on the overburdened troop training regimen and refocus on soldiers’ ability to fight in combat,” The Washington Times reported.The Chief of the Army’s collective training division Col. John O’Grady said that the former training requirements “served as barriers to maximizing time … to build readiness and lethality” within combat units.“The Army’s regulations and policies that deal with training were pretty settled, and there were not a lot of detractors to it. … It was all the other [training] requirements that we levied on ourselves, or we had levied from other places” that led to the burdensome approach to combat readiness, O’Grady explained.These changes will bring the Army in line with the Pentagon’s new National Defense Strategy under President Trump, and the policy initiatives of Defense Secretary Mattis, which include more focus on challenging rivals such as Russia and China, and increasing the military’s overall lethality.In addition to doing away with mandatory non-combatant training, the Army is also extending the time soldiers spend in infantry training. “Soldiers graduating from the nine-week basic training course will now spend an additional two months in advanced individual training before heading to their first duty stations,” The Washington Times reported.“The military is expected to prepare its members in warfare: to kill, destroy, and break our enemies. The most important factors in preparing a strong military are not hormone therapy, surgical sex changes, or politically correct education,” wrote speaker and author Walt Heyer for The Daily Signal. “We need psychologically fit, emotionally sound, highly trained troops to protect our nation from its enemies.”Under the leadership of Trump and Mattis, military men and women can take comfort that they will be prepared for the challenges they will face on the battlefield and be spared from Obama era indoctrination.westernjournal.com/ct/army-chucks-obamas-pc-training-re-focuses-on-killing-the-enemy/archive.fo/libzZ

Military should focus on combat not gender politics When a democracy has devolved to the point of defining its core values as egalitarian libertarianism, then the hierarchical authoritarian institutions of the state, like the Armed Forces are inevitably going to be ineffective and occupied with trivial civil issues, especially when a nation's Armed Forces are defining themselves as protectors of democracy and consequently self-cucked from restoring natural order with a coup.

11 months ago

Ayden Young

Speaking of making the military actually competent, how do we finally kick out the literal walking vaginas out of our military? I'm tired of seeing female paratroopers being shown everywhere in the media and having ads everywhere bragging about female officers in the army.

What the fuck, why are these stupid women in there? Passing the barebones training doesn't quality you for war you stupid bitch.

11 months ago

Jace Morgan

egalitarian libertarianismThose two things are in direct opposition to one another.Polite sage for autistic nitpicking.

11 months ago

Jacob Johnson

They don't even pass basic training. A "good" score for females is a failing score for males in the military.

11 months ago

Liam Lopez

(checked)/pol/tards like can't even into actual politics

11 months ago

Nathaniel Evans

Speaking of making the military actually competent, how do we finally kick out the literal walking vaginas out of our military? wanting EPOPines out of the sausage festWhat are you, gay?

female paratroopersOh my fuck! What did I miss? Last time I checked the only women in Specialneeds Forces were in office duties. What's next? OYKoudes? (pic related)

drug abuseThat one does make sense though. Isn't there an absolute shitload of drug use in the military? You want soldiers in fighting condition, but strung out on who knows what.

11 months ago

Ryder Bailey

My penis is more important than keeping our soldiers alive and not getting annihilated within 24 hours by the Turkish giant Good thing the likes of you will never step foot in the military. Kill yourself immediately.

11 months ago

Michael Baker

They should provide drug abuse training going into the military during boot camp and when leaving the military as counseling. If your combat soldiers want to be fucked up on drugs during their free time, just let them. They're bustin' their balls out there for Israel.

11 months ago

Anthony Barnes

I'm all for ditching libtard gender shit, but didn't widespread drug abuse really fuck us over in nam?

11 months ago

Kayden Diaz

libertarian socialism state enforced freedomAnother contrition

11 months ago

Ethan Perry

Nigga you just went full MGTOW.

By darwinian degree without a penis your attempts to to stay alive are moot in the long term.

It's simply not natural to be isolated away from women in sausagefests for too long and even if militant rape was allowed to blow some steam our only option would be female turkroaches. Females in the armed forces are not always bad news as long as they know their place as moral boosters and are kept away from combat duties and for ornamental and a few logistical roles.

11 months ago

Jose Morgan

See pic related.

Females in the armed forces are not always bad news as long as they know their place as moral boosters and are kept away from combat duties and for ornamental and a few logistical roles.Secretaries don't need a rank and a uniform, just keep them in the civilian corps.

implying I ever tried to argue the left is not utterly retarded in every aspect, even more so in their nomenclatureBeing logically consistent is irrelevant when they have successfully subverted the "liberal" title since the Reign of Terror and are the predominant ideology in the West if not the whole world ever since.

11 months ago

Eli Scott

An oxymoron as it may be it still is a by far a more influential position in real politicsWhich as strengths go is pretty weak. Constantly worrying about realpolitik and mass appeal is how you get milquetoast cuckservatives, and isn't sustainable in the long run. Hence why the left is beginning to lose ground in public opinion.

11 months ago

Christopher Cook

Good point.

11 months ago

David Watson

Who cares? The US military is a tool for IsraelThey aren't thoughPlease go back to /pol/eddit

11 months ago

Jonathan Green

libertarianism is JewishThe interesting thing I've always found here is that the Jews that ended up being libertarian aren't very Jewish at all, and have usually been ostracized from the Tribe. Hell, Paul Gottfried, an ancap Jew, explicitly talks about how Jews use the left to subvert American politics and how it's impossible to talk about the Frankfurt school with mentioning its Jewish roots.

Yes they fucking are, because egalitarian fantasies require gibs for everyone to pretend they're equal when they very clearly are not.

11 months ago

Isaac Perez

because egalitarian fantasies require gibs for everyone No they don't, dipshit. Egalitarian libertarianism is simply saying every human has the rights of life, liberty, and the ability to own private property. Quit being an autistic Greekshit who doesn't know anything about politics.

11 months ago

Daniel Harris

Egalitarian libertarianism is simply saying every human has the rights of life, liberty, and the ability to own private propertyThat's called meritocracy, and not at all what most people mean when they say egalitarianism. See picrelated for an example of this in action.

Quit being an autistic GreekshitI'm not the gyro, doublenigger. Look at to whom you're replying, it's not difficult and it doesn't take long.

who doesn't know anything about politics.At the moment we're not talking politics at all, but autistically quibbling over semantics. You clearly knew what I meant when I said egalitarianism, so there's no reason for you to get so assblasted over a definition.

Two sides of the same shekel typical tricks…Did you miss the part where right-wing Jews actively call out kikery and subversion in the US? That's more redpilled on the JQ than a lot of whites.

11 months ago

Nathaniel Ross

Did you miss the part where right-wing Jews actively call out kikery and subversion in the US?Link it.

11 months ago

Kayden Martinez

And even if true it still doesn't contradict the two-sided shekel position. Controlling all sides on the debate for #NotAllJews points is the oldest kike survival strategy in the book.

11 months ago

Connor Johnson

wanting total freedom = MUH HIPPIES REEEEEPlease go back to wherever you crawled from. You aren't welcome on this board.

11 months ago

Liam White

Literally the embed in this post , to which you were replying. Here's another one if that's not enough for you: hooktube.com/watch?v=gYPAvT-3Fvs He's made other talks on the matter as well but it seems like they've been taken down from Youtube.

And even if true it still doesn't contradict the two-sided shekel position.If that's the case, why are Jews disproportionately leftist instead of evenly distributed throughout all political positions?

Controlling all sides on the debate for #NotAllJews points is the oldest kike survival strategy in the book.How exactly is naming the Jew a survival strategy? Why on Earth would someone say "the Frankfurt school and cultural Marxism have undeniable Jewish roots" if one was in league with said Jews?

Your behavior has gone beyond rational suspicion of kikery to the point of irrational spite and paranoia; if a Jew told you drinking water is healthy would you dehydrate yourself based on that alone?

if a Jew told you drinking water is healthy would you dehydrate yourself based on that alone?not knowing that well-poisoning is the most signature jewery in history I-it's only lavender aroma, goy…

11 months ago

Xavier Garcia

I'd bet you think speed limits are a violation of 'total freedom'How dumb are you? Ten jews sit in a circle, and a guard watches over them One jew speaks up and cries 'those five jews over there are nepotistic, hate goyim and here's the proof!', and the guard disposes of the accused. Then people would oppose removal of the ones who tattled, because they are playing the good guy.

11 months ago

Ethan Smith

I'd bet you think speed limits are a violation of 'total freedom'this shit againWe blew you the fuck out already in the other thread about this, get over it.

11 months ago

Adrian Allen

If that's the case, why are Jews disproportionately leftist instead of evenly distributed throughout all political positions?Because that's the actually corrosive and the most proven successful stance against the White goy. If conscienceless muslims were their concern they would go full colonial rightwing like they are in Israel.

How exactly is naming the Jew a survival strategy?It's pretty fucking simple, it guarantees that a portion of the kike population will be viewed as innocents in the inevitable event of kikery backfiring after going overdrive.

11 months ago

Lincoln Lewis

If you call being ridiculed and laughed at winning, more power to you. Libshits are truly mentally ill.

11 months ago

Andrew Myers

total freedomI want total freedom to rape your mom but I can't do it because she consented.

Also even "total freedum" is more of an irrelevant abstract than your precious magical "rights". One only has the rights he earns and defends, rights don't sprout from the ground, grow on fucking trees or descend from the sky like manna.

11 months ago

Mason Edwards

Second this, natural rights are an accepted construct only for mild libertarians/minarchists.

11 months ago

Eli Ortiz

<not knowing that well-poisoning is the most signature jewery in history Ever consider that's what's happening to you right now? That you're being manipulated into an irrational hatred of an ideology that acutally works because you're triggered by a couple kikes within it?

speed limit autismJesus Christ not this shit again

Libshits are truly mentally ill.Libshits were the ones who reduced federal speed limits in the past and are the ones calling for reduced speed limits now.

One only has the rights he earns and defends, rights don't sprout from the ground, grow on fucking trees or descend from the sky like manna.I don't think it's disputed that natural rights are "social constructs" to a certain degree, and that you have to be willing to defend them. It's better to say that "natural rights" is a postulate about human behavior, which says that property rights are the things humans have a natural tendency to want to defend, and that acknowledgement of property rights is necessary for a civilized society. NOT the only thing that's necessary, because as you said rights don't fall from the sky, but it's the first step.

Libshits are truly mentally ill.says the libshitmuh "rights dont exist XD"Why do you sound like a 13 year old redditor? Rights are inherent, get over it, faggot.

11 months ago

Anthony Cox

He thinks vying for 'total freedom' and no speed limits isn't libertarian. Imagine being so dumb that you don't even know what your own political stance is. Rights are inherentWell damn, I had a right to completely bare arms back in 1900 but, huh, where did that go? Oh right, no one defended it. The underage is always the first to jump to calling someone else underage.

11 months ago

Xavier Taylor

He thinks vying for 'total freedom' and no speed limits isn't libertarian.Nothing I said indicated that, dipshit.Well damn, I had a right to completely bare arms back in 1900 but, huh, where did that go?You rolled over like a little bitch and let people take it from you.

11 months ago

Brandon Price

Congratulations, you just defeated your own points and at the same time insulted yourself. Am I being led on here? I refuse to believe someone can legitimately be this stupid.

11 months ago

Jordan Phillips

Rights are inherentProve it.

11 months ago

Isaiah Morris

I doubt that his brain has neurologically matured enough to grasp the irony.

11 months ago

Sebastian Garcia

Congratulations, you just defeated your own points and at the same time insulted yourselfHow? You're the one spouting nonsense autistically.

Confirm your age

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.