FOIA Activity: 10 New Procedural or Substantive Decisions

We have added 10 decisions of a procedural or substantive nature filed between July 7, 2013 and July 13, 2013. These are associated with 10 FOIA cases pending in federal district court. Note that because there can be delays between the date a decision is made and when it shows up on PACER, this listing includes only decisions that appeared on PACER during this period.

Click on the date to view the full text of the decision. Click on a case title below to view other details for that case, including links to the docket report and complaint.

July 12, 2013: ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson granting [36] Motion for Leave to File; granting in part and denying in part [20] Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part [22] Motion for Summary Judgment. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2013)

July 11, 2013: ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint that incorporates all the causes of action against all the Defendants that Plaintiff wishes to pursue at this time within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. The Court will then r eview the Second Amended Complaint for frivolity and determine at that time which claims shall proceed. Plaintiffs [4] Motion to Certify Class Action is DENIED. Plaintiffs [5] Motion to Submit Documents Into Evidence is DENIED. Plaintiffs [8] 10 [20] and [28] motions which relate to an appeal of his medical certification are DENIED as MOOT. Since the Court is ordering Plaintiff to file a Seconded Amended Complaint !
in which Plaintiff can name all parties against which he is asserting a cla im, Plaintiffs [9] Motion to Add Parties and Plaintiffs [14] Motion to Dismiss Claims Against Defendant Moak are DENIED as MOOT. Since the FAA has filed a [25] Motion to Dismiss that is not within the Courts jurisdiction because the FAA is not a p arty to this action, the clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the motion [25] The clerk is also DIRECTED to terminate Michael Huerta and the Federal Aviation Administration as parties to this action. Plaintiffs [17] 18 and [30] discovery motions are DENIED as untimely. Plaintiffs [13] Emergency Motion to Appoint Counsel and Plaintiffs [19] Motion to Appoint Counsel are DENIED. Plaintiffs [21] Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as untimely. Plaintiffs [29] Emergency Motion for Declaratory Judgment is DENIED as MOOT. Plaintiffs [31] Motion for Alternative Service is DENIED as MOOT.Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 7/11/2013. (vld)