Abstract

Being able to adequately process numbers is a key competency in everyday life. Yet, self-reported negative affective responses towards numbers are known to deteriorate numerical performance. Here, we investigated how physiological threat responses predict numerical performance. Physiological responses reflect whether individuals evaluate a task as exceeding or matching their resources and in turn experience either threat or challenge, which influences subsequent performance. We hypothesized that, the more individuals respond to a numerical task with physiological threat, the worse they would perform. Results of an experiment with cardiovascular indicators of threat/challenge corroborated this expectation. The findings thereby contribute to our understanding of the physiological mechanism underlying the influence of negative affective responses towards numbers on numerical performance.

Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2000). Challenge and threat appraisals: the role of affective cues. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 59–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scheepers, D., de Wit, F., Ellemers, N., & Sassenberg, K. (2012). Social power makes the heart work more efficiently: evidence from cardiovascular markers of challenge and threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,48, 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., Geppert, B., Schnitker, R., Weber, J., et al. (2008). All for one but not one for all: how multiple number representations are recruited in one numerical task. Brain Research,1187, 154–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar