Subject: Re: Difference between LISP and C++
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Date: 31 Oct 2002 17:08:24 +0000
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3245072904113721@naggum.no>
* arien <spammers_suck@getlost.invalid>
| This is an example of Naggers principle.
It is rather an example of your limited grasp of the world around you.
For instance, I expect people to think. Bringing up animals in order to
explain how to deal with you is an interesting approach to let me know
that I should not expect you to think.
| What you guys have done is wrong, Erik's behaviour in particular is
| shocking, and above I have provided the evidence to why.
Yes, my tactic does not work on animals. What I did not know was that
you were an animal. Therefore, I must apologize and instead give you
resounding applause for the amazing feats that animals can do these days.
Please bring my best compliments to your trainers. I did not realize they
could teach animals Java, yet, but I am always open to surprises. What
kind of animal are you? I would hazard a guess on a chimpanzee, as other
chimpanzees have managed to learn symbolic language.
The first clue that you were probably an animal should have been your
lack of a last name. I have never heard of any lab rats or chimpanzees
with last names.
| The more you continue to argue that this *corporal punishment* style is
| correct, the more you display your old-fashioned, cruel behaviour.
Again, I apologize. Had I known you were a chimpanzee or some other
trainable animal, I would certainly not have treated you as a human being.
--
Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway
Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder.
Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.