All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run

Louis CK is a victim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)

CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run

Louis CK is a victim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)

CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that

When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.

To your point though, it does appear that Charlie Sheen may have been the "victim" of what you speak. There's people on here calling him a pervert over something that may not be true at all. But to be fair. . . .

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run

Louis CK is a victim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)

CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that

When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.

To your point though, it does appear that Charlie Sheen may have been the "victim" of what you speak. There's people on here calling him a pervert over something that may not be true at all. But to be fair. . . .

giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)

giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)

That's where defamation and slander lawsuits come into play. The problem is, you can't squeeze but so much water from a stone. If the accuser is broke then the judgement against them isn't worth the paper with the judge's signature on it.

_________________I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican... if you refuse to consider alternatives to the two parties, you support the Status Quo and you are a major part of the problem.

giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)

That's where defamation and slander lawsuits come into play. The problem is, you can't squeeze but so much water from a stone. If the accuser is broke then the judgement against them isn't worth the paper with the judge's signature on it.

yep, there is a risk but it is tiny, we have reached the sad point that once the accusation is made the person is guilty, I like evidence. All these people may be guilty as hell but people lie and change stories, humans are human

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run

Louis CK is a victim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)

CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that

When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.

To your point though, it does appear that Charlie Sheen may have been the "victim" of what you speak. There's people on here calling him a pervert over something that may not be true at all. But to be fair. . . .

giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)

Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run

Louis CK is a victim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)

CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that

When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.

To your point though, it does appear that Charlie Sheen may have been the "victim" of what you speak. There's people on here calling him a pervert over something that may not be true at all. But to be fair. . . .

giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)

Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.[/quote]

You do realize people lie, right? if someone says something it means nothing without some kind of proof, same as any other criminal trial. But this is not a trial, this is throw out an accusation, let it cause the damage, that achieves the goal and on to the next person.

Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.

20 years ago? Perhaps. However, our contemporary media-driven, attention seeking culture makes me more and more skeptical of such claims. I may believe they're guilty, but I also account for the possibility that the accusers are totally FOS (see the Duke Lacrosse case). Low status + desperation means some people have nothing to lose but much to gain. Fifteen minutes of fame on Facebook or Twitter drives people to do stupid shiite.

_________________"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire

"Christian socialism is but the holy water with which the priest consecrates the heart-burnings of the aristocrat" Karl Marx

Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.

20 years ago? Perhaps. However, our contemporary media-driven, attention seeking culture makes me more and more skeptical of such claims. I may believe they're guilty, but I also account for the possibility that the accusers are totally FOS (see the Duke Lacrosse case). Low status + desperation means some people have nothing to lose but much to gain. Fifteen minutes of fame on Facebook or Twitter drives people to do stupid shiite.

Louis cK with the saavyest PR move of the century. Instead of denying it and dying by slow trickle of information. He admits it, takes his beatings. And moves on and he differentiates himself from every other person playing the deny deny deny game.

Louis cK with the saavyest PR move of the century. Instead of denying it and dying by slow trickle of information. He admits it, takes his beatings. And moves on and he differentiates himself from every other person playing the deny deny deny game.

Lol......I just read his statement.......LOOK AT MY DICK!

What a magoo.......

_________________"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

Louis cK with the saavyest PR move of the century. Instead of denying it and dying by slow trickle of information. He admits it, takes his beatings. And moves on and he differentiates himself from every other person playing the deny deny deny game.

Louis cK with the saavyest PR move of the century. Instead of denying it and dying by slow trickle of information. He admits it, takes his beatings. And moves on and he differentiates himself from every other person playing the deny deny deny game.

Yep. He’ll be fine.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I like how apologies are all it takes for liberal redemption, blood for conservative redemption. Aka, there's no such thing as liberal capable of forgiveness outside of their cliche. Y'all are more flimsy than a Japanese paper house.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum