Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Democrats Skip Votes, Delaying Confirmation of Trump Nominees

The Senate Finance
Committee’s room was empty after Democrats boycotted confirmation votes
on Tuesday for Representative Tom Price as secretary of health and human
services and Steven Mnuchin as Treasury secretary.Credit
Gabriella Demczuk for The New York Times

WASHINGTON
— Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee sought to stall the
confirmations of Steven Mnuchin and Tom Price, President Trump’s picks
for Treasury secretary and secretary of health and human services, by
refusing to attend scheduled votes on Tuesday.

As
Mr. Trump’s dramatic firing of his acting attorney general threw the
capital into tumult, Democrats on Tuesday also seized on the
contentiousness to try to block Senator Jeff Sessions’s nomination as
attorney general because they said he was too close to Mr. Trump.

In
describing their tactic of boycotting the votes on nominees to treasury
and to health and human services, Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon said that
recent news reports suggested Mr. Mnuchin and Mr. Price had given false
statements in their nomination hearings. He said more information was
needed before making judgments about the nominees.

“We have made clear that we need additional information,” Mr. Wyden said.

Senator Debbie Stabenow, Democrat of Michigan, assailed the nominees for failing to be honest with the committee.

U.S. & PoliticsBy REUTERS1:39
Hatch Denounces Boycott by Democrats

Video

Hatch Denounces Boycott by Democrats

Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of
Utah, rebuked Democrats for boycotting the committee vote on Steven
Mnuchin to be Treasury secretary and Tom Price to head the Health and
Human Services Department.

“The truth matters,” she said. “That’s not what has been happening here.”

Republicans
expressed dismay at the delay. “I think this is a completely
unprecedented level of obstruction,” said Senator Patrick J. Toomey,
Republican from Pennsylvania.

But
with a Supreme Court vacancy nearing its 12-month point after a long
blockade by Republicans, Democrats were not exactly feeling the heat, at
least not yet.

During
a morning-long hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Democrats
painted Mr. Sessions as an extremist legal savant for Mr. Trump in
support of right-wing ideologies, while Republicans portrayed him as a
whip-smart lawyer and law-and-order prosecutor who would enforce the law
as written.

“How
could we possibly conclude that this nominee will be independent?”
asked Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, the top Democrat on the
Senate Judiciary Committee.

Photo

Senator Dianne Feinstein of
California. the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee,
questioned whether Senator Jeff Sessions, the nominee for United States
Attorney General, could maintain his independence from President Trump.Credit
Gabriella Demczuk for The New York Times

She
said that Sally Q. Yates, the former acting attorney general fired late
Monday, showed “guts” and independence in refusing to defend Mr.
Trump’s executive order banning immigrants from seven largely Muslim
countries.

“I have no confidence that Senator Sessions will do that,” Ms. Feinstein said.

Democrats
hope to turn the tumult into a referendum on Mr. Sessions, an Alabama
Republican, and whether he would have the independence to serve as the
nation’s chief law enforcement official after emerging as one of Mr.
Trump’s closest advisers in the presidential campaign.

Democrats
are already calling it “the Monday night massacre” after Mr. Trump
fired Ms. Yates, the acting attorney general, for refusing to defend his
immigration order in court.

Senator
Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee,
said in opening the hearing that there was still “no mystery” whether
Mr. Sessions would be confirmed, since the Republicans hold a majority.
He urged approval of Mr. Sessions as quickly as possible to restore
leadership at the Justice Department.

Get the Morning Briefing by Email

What you need to know to start your day, delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday.

Receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services.

At
Mr. Sessions’s nomination hearing this month, Democrats challenged him
repeatedly about whether he would have the independence to stand up to
Mr. Trump if the president veered into legally questionable terrain. Mr.
Sessions assured the lawmakers that he would be able to “say no” to the
president and would not be a “mere rubber stamp for the president.”

Mr. Sessions said he was not involved in drafting the contentious executive order on immigration.

Republicans
showed no sign of breaking rank as they defended Mr. Sessions, a friend
of many senators who served alongside a number of them on the
committee.

The hearing evolved into dueling portraits of what Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, called “two different people.”

Senator
John Cornyn, the Texas Republican, scoffed at the “faux outrage” from
Democrats who cast Ms. Yates’s stance as a “a Watergate-style act of
political courage.”

Democrats,
he said, were unfairly making Mr. Sessions the target of their anger
because they “still seem to be upset about the results of the election.”