Several well-intentioned citizens
pose to me the question of whether a fellow citizen with a mother or father of
foreign race is a Hellene.

Kalliope Iris met me at my recent
speech in Piraeus, and she posed the following questions:

If an ancestor of a Hellene was a foreigner 6-7 generations ago, does this
influence whether she is a "pure" Hellene? Does a Hellene
betray Hellas if she has a love affair with a foreigner? If a brilliant
inventor of Hellenic and French descent wanted to offer his inventions to
Hellas, would we have to refuse? Finally, she asks me whether I would
prohibit Hellenes from having love affairs with people of foreign race, so long
as I hold authority.

Because such questions arise constantly, I ought to make my position clear.

Whoever argues like Kalliope,
tacitly uses the individual and the present as constituents of Hellenism.
That is to say, he/she focuses on the individual instead of the
aggregate. On the present, rather than the past and the future.

I will argue based on the social
aggregate, gazing at the past and the future of the Hellenic Nation.

1. Hellenic indigeneity is not
a flag of convenience. It is not a publicly held shipping company where
the ships change flags overnight.

In order for us to have a future as
a nation, we must know who we are, from where we originate, and where we're
aiming.

If we name anyone who happened to be
born in Hellas a Hellene, then we adopt the right of the soil, and we convert
our land into a multiracial, multinational and multicultural garbage dump.

2. A nation exists when an
aggregate of people has common biological and cultural roots, elements that
lead to a common national consciousness. When these bonds are broken or
when people of foreign race are assimilated, then state constructs such as
Turkey and the United States of America are created. These lands use the
term "nation", but they are not nations. They are state
constructs that try to create an artificial nationality.

3. We,
as Hellenes, do not want to assimilate foreign peoples and cultures. Nor
do we want to be assimilated by foreign peoples and cultures.

If we accept the assimilation of
people of foreign race because they declare themselves patriots, then we will
accept the assimilation of Hellenic expatriates abroad because they declare
themselves patriots there. We do not want our brethren living abroad to
be assimilated.

Will we adopt our ethno-racial mutilation as an official foreign policy in
order to satisfy some people of foreign race who declare themselves Hellenes?

The great crime that will be
committed against our Nation if we adopt the right of the soil, does not only
stop in that people of foreign race will receive Hellenic indigeneity.
The worst is that those Hellenic expatriates who live abroad will be regarded
as foreigners, pursuant to the right of the soil. Our Northern Epirotian
brethren are regarded as Albanians by our treasonous, anti-Hellenic state.

4. Miscegenation
creates problems of vitality and intelligence in the Hellenic Nation. The
Hellenes are viewed objectively and historically as a highly intelligent
people. If we allow the admixture with people of foreign race, apart from
our Hellenic diversity, our Hellenic spiritual and racial superiority will also
be destroyed.

It's obvious that those who say,
"and if my great grandfather was a foreigner, what does it matter?",
have not comprehended the issue of biological and cultural diversity of each
people. And obviously they do not accept that there are superior and
inferior races, something that comes in stark contrast with Nature and science.

5.
Let's say that a Hellene has a child with a foreign woman. When that
child grows up, it won't have a problem intermingling with a person of foreign
race and bringing a child into the world. The grandson/granddaughter of
the initial Hellene will now have 25% Hellenic blood. If the admixture
continues, and if done in large numbers, not a trace will be left of the
Hellenic Race.

In the argument, "although
so-and-so is a foreigner, he/she is a much better patriot than many
Hellenes", I respond that this does not ensure us who he/she will
procreate with in the future. Why would a man of Polish and Hellenic
descent, for example, have the affinity to preserve the Hellenic biological and
cultural elements from the moment he originates from an admixture?

It's more likely that he'll
intermingle with a woman of foreign race. No one can convince us that a
person of Hellenic and Chinese descent, for example, from a Hellenic father and
a Chinese mother, will be interested in preserving the Hellenic Race. Nor
will he/she be interested in the continuity of the Hellenic Civilization.
He/she may respect the Hellenic Civilization, but only as a museum piece.
There will always be within him/her the Chinese cultural element by 50%.

Therefore, the term
"Hellene" for the mongrels acquires a geographical and cosmopolitan
identity.

For Hellenism to be rescued from
such admixture, we must assume that there exists a political regime which will
prohibit the mongrel who received Hellenic indigeneity/citizenship from
procreating with a person of foreign race. So that after 4-5 generations,
the amount of foreign blood in the descendants will have been reduced.

I very much doubt whether those who
pose the question, "but the so-and-so foreigner is a good patriot, why
shouldn't we give him/her indigeneity?", would sign a law that requires
the mongrel to avoid intermingling with people of foreign race, under the
threat of the loss of the acquired indigeneity/citizenship.

And besides, how would it be
possible? The one who asks me to give indigeneity to the people of
foreign race, to accept that the person of foreign race or the mongrel will be
required to respect Hellenic endogamy.

Obviously, he/she will support the
erotic intermingling of each Hellene with whomever he/she wants.

6.
There is no statistical evidence that the half foreigner-half Hellene will
acquire a Hellenic consciousness. He/she may very well acquire a foreign
consciousness. If the mother of a fellow citizen was a Turk and the
father a Hellene, how do we know that he/she will acquire a Hellenic, patriotic
consciousness instead of a Turkish one? And why should we get into the
process of giving him/her indigeneity, only later to suspect him/her?

7.
As Hellenes by genus, we constantly make references to our Ancestors.
Whether we're talking about Alexander the Great, or about Herakleitos, or about
Odysseas Androutsos, or about Pavlos Melas. We honor them. We want
to resemble them.

To which ancestors will the
Hellenized foreigner attribute honors? Which ancestors will a person of
Hellenic and Romanian descent want to resemble?

Some fellow citizens of ours treat
national issues entirely superficially. If we regard a Hellene someone
with a Bulgarian father and a Hellenic mother, will we allow him to be admitted
to the Evelpidon Military Academy and to serve in Thrace? Will we allow
him to enlist in the Hellenic secret services?

If we allow it, we activate a time
bomb in the foundations of the Hellenic Nation. If we don't allow it,
having given indigeneity to people of foreign race, then we create second-class
citizens, without equal rights.

That is to say, we get into
vicissitudes because some people treat the issue of indigeneity trivially.

8.
Even if we assume that some people with one Hellenic parent become good
patriots, the question of numbers arises. How many mongrels will we give
indigeneity to? Will we set a numerical limit, or will we promote
miscegenation as in the U.S.A.?

History teaches that if there is a
significant amount of people of foreign race in one land, then it is prone to
foreign political interventions. That is to say, we create minority
issues out of nowhere, and consequently the right of military intervention by
foreign lands.

If the people of foreign race with
Hellenic indigeneity/citizenship originate from bordering states, and if they
indeed reside on the borders, then a most serious issue of National security
arises.

Therefore, those who argue on the basis of, "I have a childhood friend
from a foreign mother, but he is a good patriot", obviously are not
acquainted with geopolitical science or history.

9.
One of the erroneous, tacit admissions of those who are indifferent to issues
of racial origin, is that the foreigners who come to Hellas and declare
themselves patriots, will be assimilated and will become good Hellenes.

The case of us being assimilated
into them, doesn't cross their minds.

History teaches that there are
communities that not only do not get assimilated, but instead try to assimilate
the surrounding majority. Such communities are presently the Islamic
ones.

There exists an issue of cultural
incompatibility. There is another problem that does not seem to interest
those who support the foreigners who want to acquire Hellenic
indigeneity. Will they become Hellenes based on our terms, or according
to their own? Because so far, they become "Hellenes" based on
their terms.

10.
The criminal record and the medical history of those illegal colonizers who
invaded Hellas does not seem to greatly interest those who support the
acquirement of indigeneity by the people of foreign race.

Nor are they interested in the
unemployment they cause the Hellenes. Nor if the Hellene wants them in
his/her country. The main focus of the discussion so far is what the
foreigner wants. If the foreigner wants to acquire
indigeneity/citizenship, the Hellene had to accept it. They never asked
the Hellene whether he/she wants the foreigner in Hellas.

Therefore, we're talking about
colonization, rather than the acquirement of indigeneity/citizenship by foreign
"Hellenic" patriots.

11.
Someone could object and claim that there will be a selective process, and that
there won't be a massive Hellenization of foreigners. This is a comical
argument because by doing a selective process, it signifies that as a State you
are implementing elementary principles of eugenics. Such as intelligence
quotient, ethno-racial origin, state of health, cultural compatibility, level
of education, age of applicant.

So long as the treasonous regime in
which we live doesn't implement principles of eugenics in the Hellenic
population, there is no way they'll be applied to foreigners who request Hellenic
indigeneity/citizenship. They cannot convince us that they will do a
qualitative selection of foreigners, when they don't even apply eugenics among
Hellenes.

12.
Citizenship is one thing, and indigeneity is another. Those who argue in
favor of the foreigners, expunge this significant difference. The subject
of indigeneity does not even arise, because it is associated with the
Blood. If we identify indigeneity with citizenship, the definition of the
Hellene changes and is identified only with the soil.

Race, ancestors, psyche, creed,
history, civilization -- everything is erased in order to satisfy the person of
foreign race who seeks Hellenic indigeneity. Which is hubris!

Illegal colonization, quantity,
quality, cultural compatibility, criminal record, medical history, origins from
bordering states of the foreigners, are issues that don't concern those who
want Hellenic indigeneity/citizenship to be given to the foreigners.

13.
For someone to be called a Hellene, an evolutionary effort spanning thousands
of years by our Ancestors was required. One lifetime is not enough.
Our Hellenic Ancestors kept their psyche and blood pure for centuries, in order
for the following generations to have the right to call themselves Hellenes.

It is not permitted of Hellenes to
promote a Europe of the nations, because by this we equalize the Hellenic
Nation with the non-Hellenic nations. The Hellenic Nation was set by the
Gods as an instructor, not a laggard of the nations. It transcends the
other nations. It stands out. It is unique and it has exclusive
privileges. This is why it ought to stand separate from the other
nations.

Hellenic
Indigeneity is a privilege, and not a right.

I have cited my stance on the
acquirement of Hellenic Indigeneity. I consider it an insult for it to be
given to people of foreign race. To the questions posed by Kalliope Iris,
I respond that any Hellene that procreates with people of foreign race destroys
the Hellenic biological and cultural distinctiveness. When I have the
authority, I will turn miscegenation into a felonious criminal offense.

If an inventor of Hellenic and
French descent wants to give his inventions to the Hellenic state, he can do so
with financial recompense. I do not intend on making Hellenic indigeneity
an object of transaction. If he is worthy as a citizen, he can receive
Hellenic citizenship. Never the Hellenic indigeneity.

If a Hellene, be it man or woman,
has some foreign ancestor some generations back, as also shown by my analysis,
it will be examined as an individual matter. But under no circumstances
will we go from the partial to the general. That is to say, if Hellenic
indigeneity/citizenship is acquired by an individual with a foreign ancestor,
it will not constitute a precedent for all cases.

But in regard to the Hellenic
Priesthood of our Ancestral Gods, the existence of a foreign ancestor is not
permitted. A detailed genealogical tree must be observed and the ancestry
of our Priests and Priestesses must be undefiled.