I seee my Nadal winning 47 slams. He will plays the next 15 years and win every French Open to give him 17 there. He will 2 out of every 3 Auastralian Open, US Open, and Wimbledons to give him 10 of each. I think that makes 47, yeah 15 + 10+10 +10 =47. So will my Nadal win 47 slams in his career, or more, if you mean more vote yes. Wont he wint that on the other hand with 47 being too many. Vote your choice.

This thread died in Feb 2009, but was revived by SoBad.
Before that, it died in September 2007, but was revived by SoBad.
Before that, it died in May 2007, but was revived by...you guessed it... SoBad.

Exhilly-rating ! ! !
The fans of yesteryear, when everything was possible, the sky was blue, the grass was green and Rafa's kneecaps were made of steel... where are they now, those enthusiasts?
Banned, most of them.
We live in serious times, folks. Take heed.

This thread died in Feb 2009, but was revived by SoBad.
Before that, it died in September 2007, but was revived by SoBad.
Before that, it died in May 2007, but was revived by...you guessed it... SoBad.

This amuses me.

Click to expand...

Thanks for taking the time to go through this 200-post thread to research all of the post history in meticulous detail. I hope you won’t hold it against me if I don’t spend the time to replicate your effort and confirm your claims. Is it safe to assume that every time I (allegedly) bumped the thread, you chimed in within 24 hours to issue passionate comments about your feelings about poster SoBad bumping a thread of poster nadalgirl26?

I think that makes 47, yeah 15 + 10+10 +10 =47. So will my Nadal win 47 slams in his career, or more, if you mean more vote yes. Wont he wint that on the other hand with 47 being too many. Vote your choice.

I must admit that this unusual mix of paranoia and delusional slander is somewhat entertaining in this otherwise serious thread. Your cyber-forensic investigative skills seem on par with your reading comprehension ability and arithmetic. You are probably a busy guy who hasn’t had a chance to spend enough time on the forum to figure out the difference between “join date” and “ban date”. You seem like a man of great intelligence and knowledge, and I hope that you find the time in your busy schedule to get to know the forum better in the near future, and perhaps post a little bit more often than you have been in the past. For avoidance of doubt, I most surely remember having many productive and frank debates on professional tennis with nadalgirl26, god bless her kind heart, well into late 2006 and mid 2007.

This thread died in Feb 2009, but was revived by SoBad.
Before that, it died in September 2007, but was revived by SoBad.
Before that, it died in May 2007, but was revived by...you guessed it... SoBad.

This amuses me.

Click to expand...

Revival skills are a necessity nowadays, people with these skills should be valued and exalted. They could save YOUR life one day.

It may have been proven wrong, but also Newtonian physics was proven wrong and not because that we consider Newton lost his importance, do we? As in literature, we need to keep the classics alive.

Click to expand...

Well, unlike Newtonian physics, the theory hasn’t been proven wrong. The Nadal slam gap originally conjectured by the analysts through the prism of the classic NG26 school of thought now stands at 33, the age of Jesus.

This excellent thread spawned/inspired about 4-5 copy-cat threads/parodies, and "47" became the magic number of slams that the latest winner of any match/round would achieve. Thus, in those glorious days, we would have seen a thread about Dustin Brown "willing 47 slams, or more, or not that many?".

At the same time, "will" became a verb which began to mean "being successful in acquiring some prized possession by merely willing"

Well, unlike Newtonian physics, the theory hasn’t been proven wrong. The Nadal slam gap originally conjectured by the analysts through the prism of the classic NG26 school of thought now stands at 33, the age of Jesus.

I seee my Nadal winning 47 slams. He will plays the next 15 years and win every French Open to give him 17 there. He will 2 out of every 3 Auastralian Open, US Open, and Wimbledons to give him 10 of each. I think that makes 47, yeah 15 + 10+10 +10 =47. So will my Nadal win 47 slams in his career, or more, if you mean more vote yes. Wont he wint that on the other hand with 47 being too many. Vote your choice.