Welcome

Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and
others concerned about HIV/AIDS. Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the
conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning: Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive
and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a
username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own
physician.

All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators
of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please
provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are
true and correct to their knowledge.

Author
Topic: Perplexing encounter (Read 2353 times)

The last year has been a rough ride. PCP pneumonia in November/06, HIV+ diagnosis soon after. CD4s were about 20 at the time, with viral load > 100K. Started HAART (Kaletra/Truvada/Zerit) in January, dropped the Zerit in March due to neuropathy.

Since starting HAART, my CD4s have increased to 130. My viral load was700 in March/07200 in April150 in May

Needless to say I'm relieved and encouraged by the progress. That is, until yesterday. Was at the ID specialist's office and he said that he would have liked to see my VL undetectable by now and that the drop between April and May was not significant enough. He mentioned that this was more of a personal preference of his, but that we need to be concerned that the downward trend continues, as a plateau or increase could indicate resistance.

So I am confused and concerned. I have a medical professional telling me that this is potentially worrysome, yet to my layman's eyes, the falling numbers are a good thing. Does anyone have any insight into the pattern of VL reduction? How long does it generally take for the VL to be undetectable?

I'm not sure what to make of all this 'undetectable' business anyway. It seems the tests they use can detect a minimum of 50 copies. Would my doctor be concerned if, say, the lowest detectable number were 100? Conversely, if they came out with a newer test that could detect as low as 25, this would make a whole new group of people 'detectable'.

At this stage, I'm looking at the trend as an indication, as opposed to the numbers. What I would really like to know is if the *slowing* of my progress is an indication that resistance is building.

Thanks for all of your insights. This forum has been a great source of hope to me in the last few months.

I would hold on. I have been pos over 20 years and never had an VL <50 until just recently. I started truvada and kaletra in Nov with a VL of 25k and multiple resistance and VL was 1120 in Feb and <50 in May. Are you taking the tablet form? I have very few side effects with this version. Hope this helps.

Thanks for the replies. I'm holding tight for now. I suppose my mid-June blood work will be indicative of what, if any, treatment changes to make. I'll be on pins and needles until then.

BTW, am on the tablet form of Kaletra. Few side effects, apart from the occasional stomach discomfort and diarrhea.

About the 'undetectable' viral load term, it seems to me that it is more an indication of the state of the technology rather than individual treatment progress. Obviously, the lower the VL number the better, but if the numbers are low and do not rise, I suppose I can live with that. Doc still seems to be intent on reaching this target, though.

The most important thing is the continued downward trend. The number is low, and means you should be undetectable soon. My vl took a long time to reach undectable. It turned out I had a long running chest infection that we thought was either side effects or a nasty flu. This can apparantly effect results, as can other infections (sexual, gut etc). Your doc even says he speaks to his own standards, which is great, but we are individual and therefore progress differently.

Remember that a retreating vl is a soon to be undetectable load.

xx

Logged

Roughly roundabout somewhere in the eighteenth or nineteenth century, Sodomite begat Homosexual out of moral, medical and legal models, bequeathing him Identity, who inbred with Nuclear Family and Industrialism to spawn Homophobia.

The sustained downward trend in your VL reduction is a good sign that the current meds are working.The VL will drop A LOT very quickly during the first few weeks of starting meds, followed by a more gradual and slower decline over time. Don't let your doc's personal preference/agenda make you become his/her personal lab rat.

Under DHHS guidelines, virologic failure is classified as VL of >400 at week 24, or >50 at week 48 of starting meds.

For some, their VL gets <50 pretty quickly whereas for others it can take a while longer.I'm on the same meds (Kaletra + Truvada) and got <400 at week 2 and undetectable (<50) at week 8, but some friends in the same clinical trial took 32 weeks to get there. There are special modified VL tests that can measure way below 50 copies, but they aren't commercially available. I doubt the pharmas will be thrilled when the sensitivity bar is being raised again