For this piece, I thank, first,
Steve DeLuca, who forwarded it to mefrom National
Coalition of Free
Men (http://www.ncfm.org) .Above all, I thank,
Rob Mazzeo,
who authored the piece and who would be interested in feedback.

This is a response to the
story sent by Martha
A. Churchill about the jail sentence of Cincinnati lawyer Doris Houser
Allen, whose false affidavit wrongly imprisoned an innocent man. The
story
was accurate but incomplete.

Doris Houser Allen prepared
a false sworn statement,
but a second woman also violated the man's rights in this case: Sylvia
Huff, Allen's client. Huff knowingly provided the information for
the false statement. Later when confronted, Huff portrayed
herself
as a victim, although earlier she had admitted that she lied in a sworn
affidavit that her boyfriend, Dwayne Harris, abused her and her
children.
A third woman, Melanie Reising, an assistant city prosecutor, chose not
to file charges against Huff.

It is proper that Allen
spend time in jail
and lose her law license. It is also proper that Huff be punished for
her
perjury, which caused an innocent man to be imprisoned. It is
also
proper that prosecutor Reising prosecute Ms. Huff for
falsification.
When will assistant city prosecutor, Melanie Reising, sworn to uphold
the
law, finally prosecute Sylvia Huff for filing a false affidavit?

That Huff lied under oath
isn't questioned
even by her. What she did next is a classic gambit of the
self-anointed
"victimized woman." She said she was the victim. She diverted attention
from the true victim, the man, to the false victim -- herself.

Keep your eye on the
bouncing ball. The man
was the victim of two women (three, if you count assistant city
prosecutor
Reising). Allen's and Huff's lies put Harris in jail. Huff
then proclaimed that she was the victim by saying that her lawyer,
Allen,
misled her into lying. Do you see how easy it is to divert attention
from
the real victim? After lying and recanting her lie, Huff overshadowed
the
man's false imprisonment by proclaiming victimhood. In reality,
Huff
and Allen were co-antagonists against Harris.

Note that Sylvia Huff's
language is that of
the self-defined woman-victim.

"I want the court to know
the great pain she
(Allen) has caused me," Ms. Huff told the judge. "I can understand an
honest
mistake, but not once did I see any remorse. Not once did I get an
apology."

Can you imagine the gall of
this woman talking
about pain and expecting an apology? Huff admitted lying in a sworn
statement.
Her lies wrongly put a man in jail. She showed no remorse.
Huff is no victim. She is a miscreant who admitted lying under
oath.
She hurt an innocent man. Right before Huff was to testify in
court,
she changed her mind and admitted that she had filed a false
affidavit.
Only then to avoid responsibility for her lie, did Huff blame her
lawyer,
said Justice Evelyn Lundberg Stratton, who wrote the second opinion for
the Ohio Supreme Court.

"Upon learning that her
actions would open
her to perjury and falsification charges, (the client) blamed it all on
(Ms.) Allen," Justice Stratton wrote. The court twice rejected a
recommendation
from the Cincinnati Bar Association to suspend Allen's law license.

Shed no tears for the
self-proclaimed "victimized
woman," Sylvia Huff. Justice has yet to be served for the real
victims,
Dwayne Harris and our society.