Thursday, 16 June 2011

The NAVI plan to spend £billions on vaccination in the poorest countries of the world is perhaps one of the most remarkable triumphs of hope of experience there has ever been! Vaccinations have never saved lives, and never will. This ‘Child Health Safety’ link goes over the evidence for this statement.

Yet the British Government, and Bill Gates, seem determined to divert aid to the 3rd world in order to benefit Big Pharma companies. As the article states, irrefutably, is that;

“the main advances in combating disease over 200 years have been better food and drinking water”.

Yet the mainstream media is always there, standing alongside Big Pharma, seeking to hide this fact from our attention. In doing so, I particularly wish to highlight the stance of the BBC, which certainly never tells the whole story about drugs and vaccines. They certainly did not do so in the discussion they organised on Newsnight a couple of nights ago. They seem to be ready to jump on to the Big Pharma bandwagon, to help them sell their drugs and vaccines, whenever they issue a press release - such as this one, which is typical of their uncritical and unquestioning approach.

One would believe that these are all important issues of public health. Yet the only thing these news releases have in common is that the BBC, nor indeed anyone else in the mainstream media, has bothered to tell you about them!

The BBC is one of the biggest culprits. They will not inform the public about the risks, or seek to discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of vaccination. This link discusses benefits of protecting children from measles (a relatively minor, short term illness in the modern world) with the risk of getting Autism (a very serious lifetime sentence).

Dr. Diane M. Harper, a lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccine, has apparently said that giving the drug to 11-year-old girls "is a great big public health experiment." She said that vaccinating little girls now is not going to protect them later since it can take a decade or more to even manifest itself as dysplasia, the HPVs against which this vaccine works may infect a little girl at the age she needs the vaccine most - meaning she will have to have a booster at the right point in time or she will not be protected. And, remember, it won't work at all if she was positive for the virus when she was inoculated in the first place.

Nor does our mainstream media tell us that drug companies have been given immunity against prosecution, in one form or another, in many parts of the world; for them, it is a win-win situation. They profit from selling the drug/vaccine, and can do so without comeback.

In contrast, for the taxpayer, it is lose-lose. They pay for the drug/vaccine - then have to compensate those who have been damaged - if, that is, they can prove they have been damaged by drugs and vaccines.

But the fact that there have been massive compensation payouts to the families of people who have died, or been severely damaged by vaccines, proves that drugs and vaccines are NOT safe. And this, despite the fact that Governments, National Health Services, the BBC and the mainstream media, repeatedly, persistently and without any apparent remorse, continue to tell us that vaccinations are entirely safe!

Undoubtedly, these are all matters of public interest and concern. The refusal of the BBC, and the mainstream media, to discuss them and to inform the public of the dangers, is a dereliction of their responsibility - especially for a public service broadcaster. The fact is that the public remains largely uninformed, completely ignorant of what is happening to them, and what is being offered to them, in the name of health.

The relationship between Big Pharma and national governments is a commercial one, in which the drug companies have control, especially in the US and UK, where they contribute significantly to employment and industrial investment.

The relationship between Big Pharma and the mainstream media is also a commercial one, in which the drug companies have control through their advertising revenues.

However, I am not entirely clear about the agenda of the BBC, a public service broadcaster, financed by the virtually compulsory licence fee. But in their relationship with Big Pharma, and conventional medicine generally, the drug companies are very definitely and clearly in control of what they tell us about our health.