More than 350,000 books downloaded

The explanation of Genesis. The Creation story of the Bible understood from the scientific and from the spiritual.

EDEN

Human nature in a controlled environment.

It was not me, it was you.

Very well.
So Eden?
Of course, Eden, I almost forgot.
After Genesis, and its seven days, we found a new description of creation but
made on a completely different way. So much so that, in general, biblical
scholars say it has a different origin, another author, and it was probably
written at another time.
In this new description there is a different line of facts.
Why not read the paragraph and analyze it?

"At the time when Yahweh
God made earth and heaven there was as yet no wild bush on the earth nor had any
wild plant yet sprung up, for Yahweh God had not sent rain on the earth, nor was
there any man to till the soil. Instead, water flowed out of the ground and
watered all the surface of the soil. Yahweh God shaped man from the soil of the
ground and blew the breath of life into his nostrils, and man became a living
being.
"Yahweh God planted a garden in Eden, which is in the east, and there He put the
man He had fashioned.
"From the soil, Yahweh God caused to grow every kind of tree, enticing to look
at and good to eat, with the tree of life in the middle of the garden, and the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
"A river flowed from Eden to water the garden, and from there it divided to make
four streams. The first is named the Pishon, and this winds all through the land
of Havilah where there is gold. The gold of this country is pure; bdellium and
cornelian stone are found there. The second river is named the Gihon, and this
winds all through the land of Cush. The third river is named the Tigris, and
this flows to the east of Ashur. The fourth river is the Euphrates. Yahweh God
took the man and settled him in the garden of Eden to cultivate and take care of
it. Then Yahweh God gave the man this command, "You are free to eat of all the
trees in the garden. But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you are
not to eat; for, the day you eat of that, you are doomed to die".
"Yahweh God said, "It is not right that the man should be alone. I shall make
him a helper". So from the soil Yahweh God fashioned all the wild animals and
all the birds of heaven. These He brought to the man to see what he would call
them; each one was to bear the name the man would give it.
"The man gave names to all the cattle, all the birds of heaven and all the wild
animals. But no helper suitable for the man was found for him. Then, Yahweh God
made the man fall into a deep sleep. And, while he was asleep, He took one of
his ribs and closed the flesh up again forthwith. Yahweh God fashioned the rib
He had taken from the man into a woman, and brought her to the man. And the man
said: "This one at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh! She is to be
called Woman [12], because she was taken from Man". This is why a man leaves his
father and mother and becomes attached to his wife, and they become one flesh.
Now, both of them were naked, the man and his wife, but they felt no shame
before each other." (Genesis 2:5-25).

12 - In some translations instead of "woman" it
says Varona ['ishshah]: "And Adam said: This is now bone of my bones and flesh
of my flesh: this shall be called Woman [' ishshah], because of the man ['ish]
it was taken. This is now bone of my bones "(Genesis 2: 23).
Adam, recognizing in her the desired partner, joyfully welcomed her as his bride
and expressed his joy in a poetic exclamation. The words "this is now" reflect
his pleasant surprise when he saw in the woman the fulfillment of his heart's
desire.
The triple repetition of "this" (as it is in Hebrew) vividly points to her as
whom he was now admiring -with joyous amazement- with the intense excitement of
first love.
Instinctively, or as a result of divine instruction, he recognized in her a part
of his own being. Thereafter he should love her as his own body as by loving her
he loves himself.
The Apostle Paul emphasizes this truth: "So husbands ought to love their wives
as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself "(Ephesians 5: 28).

"Now, the snake was the
most subtle of all the wild animals that Yahweh God had made. It asked the woman,
"Did God really say you were not to eat from any of the trees in the garden?"
The woman answered the snake, "We may eat the fruit of the trees in the garden.
But of the fruit of the tree in the middle of the garden God said, "You must not
eat it, nor touch it, under pain of death". Then the snake said to the woman,
"No! You will not die! God knows in fact that the day you eat it your eyes will
be opened and you will be like gods, knowing good from evil". The woman saw that
the tree was good to eat and pleasing to the eye; and that it was enticing for
the wisdom that it could give. So she took some of its fruit and ate it. She
also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate it. Then the eyes of
both of them were opened and they realized that they were naked. So they sewed
fig-leaves together to make themselves loin-cloths.
"The man and his wife heard the sound of Yahweh God walking in the garden in the
cool of the day, and they hid from Yahweh God among the trees of the garden. But
Yahweh God called to the man. "Where are you?" He asked. "I heard the sound of
you in the garden", he replied. "I was afraid because I was naked, so I hid". "Who
told you that you were naked?" He asked. "Have you been eating from the tree I
forbade you to eat?" The man replied, "It was the woman you put with me; she
gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it". Then Yahweh God said to the
woman, "Why did you do that?" The woman replied, "The snake tempted me and I
ate". Then Yahweh God said to the snake, "Because you have done this, accursed
be you of all animals wild and tame! On your belly you will go and on dust you
will feed as long as you live. I shall put enmity between you and the woman, and
between your offspring and hers; it will bruise your head and you will strike
its heel". To the woman He said: "I shall give you intense pain in childbearing,
you will give birth to your children in pain. Your yearning will be for your
husband, and he will dominate you". To the man He said, "Because you listened to
the voice of your wife and ate from the tree of which I had forbidden you to eat,
accursed be the soil because of you! Painfully will you get your food from it as
long as you live. It will yield you brambles and thistles, as you eat the
produce of the land. By the sweat of your face will you earn your food, until
you return to the ground, as you were taken from it. For dust you are and to
dust you shall return".
"The man named his wife "Eve" because she was the mother of all those who live.
"Yahweh God made tunics of skins for the man and his wife and clothed them. Then
Yahweh God said, "Now that the man has become like one of Us in knowing good
from evil, he must not be allowed to reach out his hand and pick from the tree
of life too, and eat and live forever!" So Yahweh God expelled him from the
garden of Eden, to till the soil from which he had been taken. He banished the
man, and in front of the garden of Eden He posted the great winged creatures and
the fiery flashing sword, to guard the way to the tree of life." (Genesis
3:1-24).

"The man had intercourse with his wife Eve, and she conceived and gave birth to
Cain. "I have acquired a man with the help of Yahweh", she said. She gave birth
to a second child, Abel, the brother of Cain.
"Now Abel became a shepherd and kept flocks, while Cain tilled the soil. Time
passed and Cain brought some of the produce of the soil as an offering for
Yahweh, while Abel for his part brought the first-born of his flock and some of
their fat as well. Yahweh looked with favour on Abel and his offering. But He
did not look with favour on Cain and his offering, and Cain was very angry and
downcast.
"Yahweh asked Cain, "Why are you angry and downcast? If you are doing right,
surely you ought to hold your head high! But if you are not doing right, Sin is
crouching at the door, hungry to get you. You can still master it". Cain said to
his brother Abel, "Let us go out"; and while they were in the open country, Cain
set on his brother Abel and killed him. Yahweh asked Cain, "Where is your
brother Abel?" "I do not know", he replied. "Am I my brother's guardian?" "What
have you done?" Yahweh asked. "Listen! Your brother's blood is crying out to me
from the ground. Now be cursed and banned from the ground that has opened its
mouth to receive your brother's blood at your hands. When you till the ground it
will no longer yield up its strength to you. A restless wanderer you will be on
earth". Cain then said to Yahweh, "My punishment is greater than I can bear.
Look, today You drive me from the surface of the earth. I must hide from You,
and be a restless wanderer on earth. Why, whoever comes across me will kill me!"
"Very well, then", Yahweh replied, "whoever kills Cain will suffer a sevenfold
vengeance". So Yahweh put a mark on Cain, so that no one coming across him would
kill him.
"Cain left Yahweh's presence and settled in the land of Nod, east of Eden.
"Cain had intercourse with his wife, and she conceived and gave birth to Enoch.
He became the founder of a city and gave the city the name of his son Enoch.
Enoch fathered Irad, and Irad fathered Mehujael; Mehujael fathered Methushael,
and Methushael fathered Lamech." (Genesis 4:1-18).

It seems obvious that this description does not correspond with
the general creation, but only with that of Eden and Adam and Eve.
When God created Eden, humanity had been walking in the world a long time,
millions of years; so much so that after God expelled Adam and Eve from Paradise,
Cain killed Abel and, as the only living child of Adam and Eve, left the
presence of God and sat on the land of Nod, where he met his wife.
Here it is evident that Cain met his wife in the land of Nod because there were
women there to be met; and because there were other countries where women lived,
other women who were of course not relatives of Adam and Eve. They were part of
other peoples, the peoples that were not God's chosen people; because in order
to choose a people there had to be other options, which were "the other", the
other men and women, the original, which had been generated during the overall
creation of species, those men that God created on the sixth day and lived in
populations like that land of Nod mentioned in the text.
If humanity -and therefore man-existed, what is the meaning of the creation of
Eden?
This point is very important, crucial Iīd say.
Humanity is now fully operational, under development and activity.
It takes, at least, two million years of evolution, but- and-once again but-it
is walking down a wrong path, and this wrong path it polytheism.
Humans, in that spiritual youth -almost spiritual children- see a god in every
force of nature, every star, and every event they cannot explain. This is
natural and reasonable for children, spiritual children, so they are naturally
polytheists.
Apparently this polytheism is not wrong in the beginning of the world; it is
indeed almost normal, almost inevitable. But, for some reason, it is clear, at
that point in history God decides it is time to take the next step,
understanding the meaning of monotheism and adopting it. It is time to discard
the facets, the biases of divinity, and replace them with the more advanced idea
of one God, a single God. This new idea, this new belief in one single God is
monotheism

It is interesting to note and observe that, although in most of the planet
people had and worshipped many gods, in China and India they did not. China and
India, at the time when the chosen people entered the picture, were already
monotheists. It is necessary to understand Hindu philosophy to understand that
they already were monotheists and, of course, still are. In India God is
everything, but not as pantheism understands it but from the closer view of
panentheism. Although they sound similar, pantheism and panentheism are
spiritually different approaches. Pantheism can become atheist-atheistic
pantheism-; but not panentheism, which is a more complex understanding of God,
the divinity, as one, omnipresent and omniscient. China and India already had
the idea of a moral and just God above all things, not only unique but moral.
His philosophy was based on the correct action -dharma in India- and on karma as
the result of oneīs acts.
This philosophy stands to this day, and it is observed in both Hinduism and
Buddhism, which can be considered a new and current derivation of the first,
based on the teachings of Siddhartha Gautama the Buddha.
It is possible that due to the type of philosophy they followed, Indians and
Chinese did not resist the idea of monotheism when Catholic missionaries arrived
in the land, in more modern times. And perhaps also for the same reason, God has
not sent the disciples of Jesus to catechize Asia. Moreover, at some point the
Holy Spirit explicitly prohibits the apostles to go to Asia. To better
understand it is good to read the words of Jesus when He sends His disciples
after the lost sheep, both of His own people, the Jews, and of the Gentiles, the
"other", all of them polytheistic. Naturally, it was not worth wasting time with
those who already had the knowledge-those who were monotheistic-, that is why
the spread of Christianity occurs from Pakistan to the West, bypassing India and
China.
The first time I noticed it, that I noticed this "detail"- when I compared the
world map and overlaid it with the initial expansion area, the area of influence
of Christianity- I was in shock.
Of course, the God of the Hebrews was and is the same as that of Asia, so why
waste time?
So, summing up, we have man diverting to a malicious polytheism -we might call
it wild- with human sacrifices and identification of God with vile, low aspects;
so it was necessary to stop and redirect this diversion and, at the same time,
take the next step of spiritual growth towards the adult form of monotheism, to
the knowledge of the one God.
It seems to me that this is precisely the reason for the creation of the chosen
people, the Jewish people, who will be in charge of first purifying those
peoples that no longer have a chance to join the new "monotheistic system"-so to
speak- and then imposing the belief in Yahweh, their God, the only God.
For this purpose God, as a first step, makes the place from where the first
humans will come out, Eden, a new pristine place, on which He first puts the man,
made from the dust of the ground. This dust is all a metaphor. Let us pause for
a moment on that idea: the man made of dust from the ground. If we recall the
comments in the original creation, that everything we are is part of the
original nebula-that cosmic dust generated in the furnaces of supernovae- there
is no doubt that we are just that: soil dust: dust plus the breath of life from
God, the soul, the spirit.
After God created this new man apart from "the other", surrounds him with a
garden, trees, plants, and animals.
It is interesting to compare and conclude that this creation is totally
different from the original, the first. In this, man is the first to be created
-because he was the most important in this phase- and then God deals with the
accessory, plants and animals.
But -there is always a but- He puts in their way the tree of good and evil,
about which He warns them, very clearly, not to eat the fruit under penalty of
certain death.
Well, we have almost completed the scene, the man, his environment, and
something forbidden ... what's missing? Yes, something is missing, we need women.
Without women, the stage, the replica of what was happening outside of Eden,
would have been incomplete.
We now have everything, the woman, who is part of the man, of one of his ribs,
with which they form one flesh in the union that is beyond explanation; and the
rest of the environment.
What now?
The drama.
The temptation.
She turns on the machine, and makes human nature remain in evidence.
Ah yes ... the temptation never well weighted...

Remember ...

"Now, Both of them were naked, the man and his wife, but they felt no shame
before each other.
"Now, the snake was the most subtle of all the wild animals that Yahweh God had
made. It asked the woman, "Did God really say you were not to eat from any of
the trees in the garden?"...

So great is the separation between these two beings and the rest of those who
already inhabited the planet, who have no idea of the slightest customs, or of
the feeling of shame-for they were naked, and, of course, that did not affect
them at all. Then the snake appears: evil, temptation, doubt, rebellion, but -yes,
again but... our beloved but-nothing would have happened if human nature did not
exist. Precisely, this whole scenario is mounted to show human nature, for us to
become aware of our nature and try to tame it. Without this component the snake
would have found a resounding NO and everything would have ended there. But...
it didnīt happened; the free will God has given us and our rebellious nature is,
was, and will be the perfect combination to get us in trouble. And it did. Not
only Eve ate, but Adam ate, and both ended thrown from Paradise- right out in
the street, as my wife would say.

Right.
Now, let's look a little more closely at this whole play.
First the threat.
This threat is not small; if they eat they will die because God is going to kill
them; not because it will do them wrong, they will have stomachache or something
... no, they will die because that is the law that God established: eating =
death penalty.
And there goes the unconsciousness, not being aware of the seriousness of the
threat; how serious, delicate and dangerous it is to contradict what God says.
Naïve Adam and Eve heard nothing of what God said, but heeded the serpent, who
skillfully explains that there is nothing to fear. She tells them that God just
does not want to share with them the gifts of the gods, and there appears the
human folly. Fools are naturally stupid, no doubt.
Did God know what was going to happen? I think so, He just wanted to show it to
us and prove it with facts.
In Eden there was no one to ask or from whom be badly influenced; they were
alone, alone with the object of desire, the law and the temptation to contradict
it.
With that, there was more than enough; there was no need for anything else,
which was amply demonstrated.
What now? Now awareness of what is right and what is wrong arises, but knowingly,
not like before when God had specified: they can do this and not that. Now they
must decide what is right and what is wrong and take the consequences, or at
least, they should bear the consequences.
So there they are sewing leaves to clothes.
At one point they are pitiful. They look like children who have done a mischief
and now do not know how to fix it; and to make matters worse they are ashamed to
be naked, so they hid from God.
God walks the Eden as if He knew nothing, like a father who obviously knew what
had happened -how wouldnīt He? Come on, He is God!- and asks: Where are you?, As
if He were playing hide and seek with a child.
This scene reminds me of many games and situations I have had with my children.
The typical: what have you done? -a completely rhetorical question because I
already knew what he had done-, but it was just necessary to ask to make him
reflect on what he had done and so try to explain why, why he had done it and
thus learn from it. And there you have God in the same situation -we must not
forget that God is a loving and merciful father.
Adam replied "I heard the sound of you in the garden", he replied. "I was afraid
because I was naked, so I hid"; how does he know he's naked, if a moment before
they had no idea of what nudity was? And God asks: "Who told thee that thou wast
naked? Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you not to eat? ".
Isnīt it wonderful? Isnīt it wonderful how God speaks to him as to a child? If I
said no, why did you do that? And there comes the explanation: "It was the woman
you put with me, she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it", so it was
her fault, not mine; and You are to blame for giving her to me as my companion.
Let's see ... not only does he not take responsibility but also he blames God!
If God so far was calm and tried not to get angry this must have filled up the
measure of His patience.
And yes ... He is not to be blamed. It was time to grab them by the ears and
..., but God remains calm and continues: "'Why did you do that?". The woman
replied, "The snake tempted me and I ate". ', And yes, that snake...
And we got this far.
God said to the serpent:
""Because you have done this, accursed be you of all animals wild and tame! On
your belly you will go and on dust you will feed as long as you live. I shall
put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; it
will bruise your head and you will strike its heel".
"To the woman He said: "I shall give you intense pain in childbearing, you will
give birth to your children in pain. Your yearning will be for your husband, and
he will dominate you".
"To the man He said, "Because you listened to the voice of your wife and ate
from the tree of which I had forbidden you to eat, accursed be the soil because
of you! Painfully will you get your food from it as long as you live. It will
yield you brambles and thistles, as you eat the produce of the land. By the
sweat of your face will you earn your food, until you return to the ground, as
you were taken from it. For dust you are and to dust you shall return"."
I wonder whether the death penalty wouldnīt have been better.
And he drove them from Eden.
"Yahweh God made tunics of skins for the man and his wife and clothed them. Then
Yahweh God said, "Now that the man has become like one of us in knowing good
from evil, he must not be allowed to reach out his hand and pick from the tree
of life too, and eat and live forever!" So Yahweh God expelled him from the
garden of Eden, to till the soil from which he had been taken. He banished the
man, and in front of the garden of Eden He posted the great winged creatures and
the fiery flashing sword, to guard the way to the tree of life."

This paragraph clearly shows the mercy of a loving father; even after such
disobedience and the seriousness of these actions, God dresses them, gives them
garments of skin-to replace the loincloth of leaves they had done. This seems a
minor issue, but it is not. Clearly, God is merciful, loving, to the point that
He does not keep the original death penalty and only sends them out, out of Eden
to live with "the other"-the other people, men that had been conceived in the
initial creation.
This raises two issues: one, how did we come to the idea that there are others
out of Eden? And two, what is the meaning of the story of Eden if Adam and Eve
were not the first humans?
Let's look first at the "other", the other people:

"The man had intercourse with his wife Eve, and she conceived and gave birth to
Cain. "I have acquired a man with the help of Yahweh", she said. She gave birth
to a second child, Abel, the brother of Cain.
"Now Abel became a shepherd and kept flocks, while Cain tilled the soil.
( )
"Cain had intercourse with his wife, and she conceived and gave birth to Enoch.
He became the founder of a city and gave the city the name of his son Enoch".
Here are two clues, two keys to understanding that other beings live out of Eden:
first, Abel was a keeper of flocks, and Cain a tiller. Keep in mind that animal
grazing and tillage are fairly recent human activities; man originally was
nomadic gatherer, so if their tasks were plowing that means, we might say, they
were modern, and that they enter the play -so to speak- in a time when humanity
had developed such activities for their livelihood. And second: "Cain knew his
wife, and she conceived and bore Enoch." How did he meet a woman if Adam and Eve
were supposedly alone in the world together with Cain, because Abel had died? If
there was a woman to be met it was simply because there was someone else to meet,
and those were "the other."
And now, what is the meaning of the story of Adam and Eve? Why are they made?
Why would God take so much trouble for just two people?
This is a much more complex issue, and to understand it we must look at the
whole Bible, the whole history of the Hebrew people, the history of the chosen
people; without understanding the Bible there is no way to understand Eden.

When reading the Bible I have reflected and discovered what I think is the
reason, the rationale for the chosen people, the Jews. We have seen human nature
in action put in evidence with Adam and Eve in the Paradise narration. Now we
must see what "the other" were doing - the other people when Adam and Eve, Cain
and Abel come into play-, so to speak, the game of Humanity.
These other people who were in the area were polytheistic; they believed in many
gods, some of which had been given violent and vile characteristics, to the
point of being offered human sacrifices. If you review some of the customs of
the time and the region, you will find extremely barbaric practices, such as
revenge, human sacrifice, polytheism and the worship of false gods.
It is obvious to me that God understood that among men there was much to correct
and that it was time to do so; that this situation could not continue and that
someone should undertake this task. Then, considering that it was not only a
matter of time and place but of nature -as demonstrated by the snake- He gives
that task to the descendants of Adam and Eve, the Hebrews -later the people of
Israel- today the Jewish people, the descendants of the tribe of Judah.
These people, the chosen people, are the people chosen by God to perform the
hard task of recovering the lost sheep, eliminating those that cannot be
redeemed and prepare the ground for the arrival of the Messiah; the Messiah Who
will wipe mankind from the guilt of their sins of evil and polytheism, and Who
will give them another chance.
It is for this purpose that makes sense to have eaten of the tree of good and
evil, as this town-which must deal with being the role model of a new age-, must
have-should have- extra knowledge "others" do not possess; and their "diploma" -the
credential of having a better understanding- is the fact they ate of the fruit
of good and evil. They were the only ones they knew why; they had the knowledge,
awareness of why they should go towards monotheism. They knew that there was
only one God; they knew there was only a single God. What is not clear to me is
whether they were ever aware of the task they had been given, although they did
it to perfection-beyond some delays and complications like the Flood, Sodom and
Gomorrah, the desert...
And finally, in the story of the Messiah, of Jesus, we find this people, the
same chosen people, the one that must kill the Messiah in order to fulfill their
task, and also to rid humanity of this tremendous guilt:
"He asked, "But what harm has he done?" But they shouted all the louder, "Let
him be crucified!" Then Pilate saw that he was making no impression, that in
fact a riot was imminent. So he took some water, washed his hands in front of
the crowd and said, "I am innocent of this man's blood. It is your concern." And
the people, every one of them, shouted back, "Let his blood be on us and on our
children!" " (Mateo 27:23-25).
"Let his blood be on us and on our children!". This phrase frees humanity from
the terrible burden of having killed the Messiah, the Son of God.

There and then, an era ends and another begins. The idea of monotheism is
already planted and spreads like a blast covering the planet until today.
Changing paradigms and laws are altered by Jesus. Jesus opens the game to all
humanity. The good news of Jesus, the Messiah, in not something reserved to the
Hebrews anymore; salvation includes "others" to the point that the apostles,
originally Jewish, offer other people-the Gentiles- to take the job to bring the
good news for everyone. No need to be Jewish to reach God; you no longer need to
be Jewish to know that God is one. From Jesus the knowledge is for everyone, and
we are all children of God, Jews and Gentiles. There is no distinction. We are
all the same herd sheep and God is the good shepherd, our Good Shepherd.