Welcome to MyPolitics-Forum.com, brought to you by the same folks who bring you MyMedia-Forum.com.Thanks for dropping by! Is the page too narrow for your preference? Once you register, you will be able to set it to your liking! You will need to register before you can post, so why not get it out of the way now? Enjoy! :)

I'm torn between the 2nd option and the 4th....rape/incest is a hard one for me. The fetus isn't to blame, obviously, but at the same time I don't know that I could tell a rape victim that they have to carry the child to term either.

Ofcourse unless the rape was immeadiatly reported and the pregnancy detected later, I'm not sure how a rape could be proven in time to terminate.

Legal with no restrictions. The individual should have the right to choose. Given that teenage pregnancy is on the rise over here, to some girls of that age it may be the only way that they think they can still have a life free of a child. I don't believe having abortion as illegal is a benefit to anyone - there is a reason these women want to abort their babies.

If the mother's life is threatened makes sense. Otherwise I don't believe abortion is a necessary practice. With a rape/incest case, it can cause more hardship to sink to the level of your attacker, by attacking an accidental life inside you.

That said, it still should be the mother's choice as long as she is given all the alternative information, and not just from a non-objective religious source. Also, there should always be enforcement regarding the age of the fetus.

I accidentally voted for the wrong choice. Count my vote for the latter not the former. Abortion should be legal.

__________________Every nut who kills people has a Bible lying around. If you're looking for violent rape imagery, the Bible's right there in your hotel room. If you just want to look up ways to screw people up, there it is, and you're justified because God told you to. ---Penn Jillette