From PFT that states a report from SI.com - the substance the triggered the positive response has not been identified yet by NFL. So any suggesting it was PEDs or some other is false, they don't know yet.

From PFT that states a report from SI.com - the substance the triggered the positive response has not been identified yet by NFL. So any suggesting it was PEDs or some other is false, they don't know yet.

Click to expand...

You left out this...

"That might sound strange, but it’s not unprecedented for the drug testers to need time to determine what substance a player took: In 2003, four Raiders players tested positive for tetrahydrogestrinone, or THG, a substance that wasn’t initially detectable in urine tests. It was only after the lengthy Balco investigation that drug testers re-tested stored urine samples and detected the substance.