I’m glad that Steve Jobs didn’t waste a dime developing for the spongers and leeches. Android devices basically have to sell at cost, with no hope of making secondary sales, just to maintain marketshare. If Google didn’t have Apple to do all of its R&D, paid for by iPhone purchasers, it wouldn’t be able to constantly “update” its Android operating system.

Then again, Google built its entire business around stealing intellectual property. Whether by spidering newspaper articles, distributing ripped movies and music via YouTube, or copying iOS, Google never fails to find a way to steal from content producers. And why shouldn’t it, when it’s enabled by an army of have-not students, unemployable social do-gooders, anarchists, Commies, and Third Worlders.

]]>By: Matthew Ungarhttp://www.androidauthority.com/china-android-market-share-samsung-82830/#comment-46645
Wed, 09 May 2012 01:25:00 +0000http://www.androidauthority.com/?p=82830#comment-46645I fixed your post for you…http://prcand.me/posts/2012/5/8/china-mobile-is-not-a-normal-carrier-it-is-the-carrier.html
]]>By: Stevehttp://www.androidauthority.com/china-android-market-share-samsung-82830/#comment-46451
Tue, 08 May 2012 04:58:00 +0000http://www.androidauthority.com/?p=82830#comment-46451I wonder who are the “several competitive third party app stores” that you refer to???
]]>By: Bogdan Petrovanhttp://www.androidauthority.com/china-android-market-share-samsung-82830/#comment-46284
Mon, 07 May 2012 12:30:00 +0000http://www.androidauthority.com/?p=82830#comment-46284Yes, thanks for the heads up!
]]>By: Sverixhttp://www.androidauthority.com/china-android-market-share-samsung-82830/#comment-46267
Mon, 07 May 2012 11:12:00 +0000http://www.androidauthority.com/?p=82830#comment-46267Perhabs, it should say 2012 in stead of 2011 in some of the places in this article?
]]>