On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 05:17:41PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> For images, fonts, and sounds, he makes an exception for the source
> code requirement. For many of these, there is no sensible source code
> anyway, and so DFSG 2 doesn't require it. That is, the image is
> itself the source code.
That's a statement I would like to know whether it is accepted by all
the other developers? I think I agree (without having thought this
through a lot), but I was not aware that this was the standard way of
interpreting things, certainly not after the recent dicussions.
For example, people say that our logo was non-free.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
mbanck@debian.org
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html