Re: John McClane vs Jason Bourne

Re: John McClane vs Jason Bourne

those are some realy good points. like you said, Jason Bourne is more of a planner but McClane is more resourcefull, he seems better at makeing use of things as they happen so im not sure who would win

[i]The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed[/i][url=http://lfgcomic.com/page/1]Interrogations are hard...[/url]

Re: John McClane vs Jason Bourne

Thats a tough one. I have to go with Bourne in the end, though, because he has more training and skill as a special operative, than McClane, who is simply a cop who has a lot of bad days.

How about this for an incredible movie: John McClane, Jack Bauer, Jason Bourne, and Sam Fisher team up against all the bad guys ever. My brain would probably explode from sheer awesomeness. I may start a topic on this . . .

Re: John McClane vs Jason Bourne

Thats a tough one. I have to go with Bourne in the end, though, because he has more training and skill as a special operative, than McClane, who is simply a cop who has a lot of bad days.

How about this for an incredible movie: John McClane, Jack Bauer, Jason Bourne, and Sam Fisher team up against all the bad guys ever. My brain would probably explode from sheer awesomeness. I may start a topic on this . . .

good idea for a toppic thats a really good idea but there is one person they could never beat....................................................(dramatic pause) Chuck Norris!

[i]The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed[/i][url=http://lfgcomic.com/page/1]Interrogations are hard...[/url]

Re: John McClane vs Jason Bourne

Common sense, Logic, and reasoning all say Bourne wins...............but I can't. You Never, EVER, count out John McClain. You could say the samething about Jason, but that just makes this match too close to call for me.

And keep it mind, it was a whole TEAM of TRAINED ASSASSINS *though admittedly not on par with Jason* that Bruce took out in Die Hard 2, and again in 4.

"You set a code to live by. I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted...I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other men, and I require the same from them."

Re: John McClane vs Jason Bourne

McClains less realistic than Bourne. Cmon, a jet fighter on a highway? His movies are unrealistic. From what I've heard, anyways. Not as bad as the MI movies. All Bournes fighting is hand to hand, and the occasional pistol. Oh, once a hunting rifle. But that's it. No "cars", machine guns, or anything, just hands and pistols. Bournes the best assassin from his story (he took out two others, with the same training), and his brains and tactics are unparalled. Bourne, all the way.

It would depend on the kind of fight. If its a fist fight- John McClane. But if there is time to plan and so forth- Bourne because he is a trained assassin.

Are you kidding? Bourne's one of the best hand to hand fighters, ever. He'll use ANYTHING in his environment, and use it well. He'll take a book, or a pen, and use it--effectively.

He can't adapt? Besides ^that^, he shoved a gas hose and a newspaper in a toaster to make a bomb. Hows that not adaptation? He taped a flashlight to a fan, making it look like he's searching a room, and then ambushed the ambushers. He fired a gas tank to distract another assassin, then hunted him down, killing him. THAT'S adaptation. He had no memory, but managed to hunt his story down, and find the people that did everything to him. He was making the whole thing up as he went.