I cover the video game industry, write about gamers, and review video games.
You can follow me on Twitter and hit me up there if you have any questions or comments you'd like to chat about.
Disclosure: Many of the video games I review were provided as free review copies. This does not influence my coverage or reviews of these games.
I do not own stock in any of the companies I cover. I do not back any Kickstarter projects related to video games. I do not fund anyone in the industry on Patreon.

'Hawken' Is Why I Hope Free-To-Play Isn't The Future Of Video Games

Hawken is a multiplayer mech combat game that would be a great buy. But it’s free to play, and that comes at a price.

Update 6/21/13: Having spent more time with the game and had discussions with Hawken’s developers, I think my early gut reactions and first impressions to the free to play nature of the game were wrong. I still have some quibbles with the model, but as far as F2P models go, Hawken does a very good job and is only getting better over time.

I started playing Hawken yesterday. The mech combat game is graphically stunning, especially for an indie title. The terrain, the mechs themselves, all of it looks gorgeous. Indeed, beyond graphics, the control scheme and movement of the mechs feels great, though I haven’t played a mech simulator in ages so I have little to compare it to.

But I just couldn’t play for that long, because I knew that almost the entire game was blocked off to me behind the Freemium paywall. Such a good-looking game, such a shame it’s been chopped up into pay-as-you-go morsels.

For instance, you start off with just one mech and you have to buy access to the others.

Yes, you can earn currency to put toward this effort as you play but you’ll realize quickly that such an endeavor will cost you a great many hours.

And you’ll be forced to fight against paying customers as you go since match-making is, as Nathan Grayson puts it, “basically broken. Seriously. It does not make matches. It breaks them. I’m not sure what arcane principles guide it to make the pairings it does, but a markedly higher-than-zero number of level 1-5 teams tossed into the deep end against level 20s forces me to suspect warlocks are involved.”

Pay to win is a death sentence as far as I’m concerned. Free to play can work. In theory it could work quite well, but in practice very few games achieve that perfect balance and only a handful achieve a good balance. They almost always feel unsportsmanlike to me, and Hawken is no exception.

Now imagine the game cost $20 like Torchlight 2 (which sold over 1 million units in 2012) or even $40 or more. You’d have access to everything from the get-go, but might have to purchase DLC later on. Everyone would start out with access to all the mechs or would be able to unlock them simply by playing the game for X amount of hours. The playing field, at least in the beginning, would be level since everyone would have the same access.

I understand that people are looking to find better revenue streams for their games, but we shouldn’t be breaking the very nature of games in order to do that. Free-to-play too often goes against the very grain of competitive gameplay and fairness that makes games fun in the first place. Hawken is certainly a very promising title, but it’s been crippled badly by its adoption of a freemium revenue model.

Yes, this is still a game in beta form, but in a sense most free-to-play games always feel like they’re in beta form unless you fork over a great deal more money than you would for a typical PC or console title.

As Grayson also notes, “free-to-play comes at a paradoxically high cost, roping off all mech classes except a jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none recruit machine that looks like a walking television. (Somewhat hilariously, its codename is CR-T.) Hawken’s XP/in-game currency accumulation rate is quite slow, too, so unlocking any of the more interesting classes takes hours. In the meantime, you can always drop precious spacebucks on a slow trickle of items, weapons, and other miscellaneous upgrades, but the agonizing rate of progress certainly doesn’t befit Hawken’s race of fleet-footed colossi.”

It’s quite similar to the model you see utilized in so many free mobile games, and is another reason I find the prospect of the Ouya console with its “free only” game catalog a less-than-exciting one.

Post Your Comment

Post Your Reply

Forbes writers have the ability to call out member comments they find particularly interesting. Called-out comments are highlighted across the Forbes network. You'll be notified if your comment is called out.

Comments

Hawken is the sort of game that really should be sold at a $30US (50% of a normal retail price, basically), seeing as it is completely multiplayer focused. Platinum Games’ ‘Anarchy Reigns’ is doing this, and it has a lot of people excited. F2P really is something of a scourge on PC gaming at the moment, as it is a misnomer – after all, how well can I play a game, and how much fun will I have playing it, if other people are able to buy better gear than me? Pay to win is the sort of thing that kills online communities, as anyone but dedicated players stop playing – just look at APB Reloaded. I know of plenty of people that stopped playing because it was pay to win, and it stopped the game from being fun. Not only that, but paying a sum of money to actually purchase the game in the first place makes people far more inclined to actually play the game, and get their money’s worth out of it. The community will be alive longer.

In any case, Hawken is baby’s first Mecha simulator. Armored Core for life.

APB Reloaded fails because most of the weapons you have to pay for are weak in terms of damage output and everyone buys the AK-47 lookalike gun. In Hawken I have managed to score kills/assists on heavy mechs with the default “TV head” mech with no problem.

Also, “baby’s first mecha simulator” and comparing this to Armored Core is apples and oranges. This is not a simulator, it’s an arcade style mech game.

Yep. It’s very much like games such as War of the Roses or Chivalry in that regard. Neither of those have gone F2P and you can see how that will benefit players in the long run especially since the games will be supported into the future with free updates. It’s such a different philosophy.

Hawken is as fast paced as any FPS but still a mech game . No other game has done this and Hawken will live, sorry to bash your dreams. Not everyone wants to play a slow mech game. I have played mech games since I was a kid and I’m 34, I enjoy Hawken . Calling Hawkens “babies first mech game” is just your view. I think it’s the best mech game in years.

I agree with you zeether . This ia nothing like armored core and I’m happy for that. I also don’t see how you can these people can cry about “grinding” a game for free and someone else paying 20 bucks and getting the same results. They just payed for you to “grind” a game for free !!!! I love how people have replaced the work play with “grind” . If you’re not enjoying “grinding” for free ( PLAYING FOR FREE !!! ) then the game is not for you . Hawken is not pay to win I have played it for a month now. This article is misinforming and just plain wrong and this dude Erik should have never posted this .

I HAVE actually PLAYED mech games from activisions mechwarrior line graphics on an old 486.. 2 and ghost bears legacy 3 ..4 went all thru earthsiege and mercenaries yes Im sorry to bash your “dreams” but as an avid lover of mech games this is nothing more then a skinned over bunny hopping fps imo… as for your “omg slow mech games” go pick up latest copy of a “best mech game in years” ARMORED CORE (been playing since 1 and bringing down 8ball)… (this comes nowhere near as good) gg