Admin Note:
Its really strange as we mentioned in our last post that 'Testament of Khawajah Moin-ud-din Chishti Ajmeri RA' will be published soon. In background of that Testament, we thought to post Sultan Shahab-ud-Din Muhammad Ghauri's Conquest of Dehli and Spiritual Role of Khawajah Moin-ud-din Chishti Ajmeri RA.

Here Orya Maqbool Jaan also mentioned 'Sultan Ghauri' and cultural roots of Muslims in Indo-Pak, in his article. Both posts will complement each other now. (that's how things work spiritually whether someone understands or not)

Yes I am agree you talk Hussain, actually Khurasaan is Iran not to Af-Pak, if you try to search on google what is actual Khurasan place there will be mention it on Iran and there will be unhide Khurasani send his convoy to fight with sufiyani who are available in syria. Now you review what current situation going on Syria.

How many refernces do you want that Pakistan is part of Khurassan?? I can give you atleast 16 different refernces showing that pakistan is part of Khurrasan. Faqar Bhai ney aik sab se common refernce wikipedia sey dey diya hey, agar us pey yaqeen nai hey tou khud reearch kar lo.

@all:i dont consider that only shias will be the soldiers of Mahdi alaye hi salam ,nor do i consider black flags of shia are the only interpretation of black flags.the subject of hadith mentions "when black flags emrge from east,that is a glad tiding for the appearanace of Mahdi (alaye his salam)"these black flags may be of Mughals or of Banu Abbas as well.and soldiers of Mahdi alaye hi salam will be from every part of world inshaAllah .and Maulana Sheikh Nazim QaddasAllahu Sirrahul Aziz recently mentioned in a meeting with afghan murids that 70,000 soldiers of Mahdi alaye hi salam will be from afghanistan.i dont think that taliban will be 70,000 in number.!and anoher important pint is that a very significant proportion of aghan population is shia!

Shia or Ravafiz what ever name them they are out of path of Islam , no need such above commments that they have some how authenticity of their belifes , regaring the Ulama accordinng to you that they " Gol mol jawab kartay hian" just coz of not sufficieant knowledge since with knowledge one must have baseerat to argue which our most ulama does not these days at all and depending on only bookish knowledge and not on their own efforts.

regarding the imamat , when allah has declared in ALYOUMA AKMALTO DEENO KUM " so it means everything has completed, App aslato aslam ka US WAY HASNA and whole life is enough to study to adopt to complet and to reach Allah and after this where we need Immaat and what Immamat will do after this more ???? if i say that WHEN QURAN MESSAGE COMPLETED then DOORS OF WILAYAT started not IMMAMAT .

The real thing is Quran and after that SUNAT and what is SUNAT in reality " ahkam orr amaal kay majmaoay ka namm " not the name of IMMAMATwho ever follow the sunnat and turn their lives according to sunnat they become the ZINDA TAFSEEER OF SUNNAT.

regaridng the Imam mehdi what ever the status of this pesonality one thing is very clear it will be a WARDI WALA of Umatay Muhamdiya who has Quran As Imam and holding tightly rasiii of Allah. NN

Well,i'm not in fvaor of discussing such issues openly.If you want a debate,we may have it later in detail and i'll present you those narrations which give rise to suspicion.and the point is that you have to then admit that authenticity of ahadith determined by scholars of ahadith is'nt a standard.(since one sahi hadith emphasizes the importance of imamat).similarly one tradition of Bukhari says something,the other one negagtes it. Imam means leader.Is'nt it true that silsila e qariya proceeds to Imam Ali bin Musa Ar Raza alaye hi salam and many other salasil proceed upto Imam HAssan Askari alaye hi salam and is'nt it true that all salasil except naqshbandi proceed through Imam Ali alaye hi salam although some researchers say that NAqshbandi silsila also proceeds through Imam Ali alaye hi salam.The point is we sunnis criticze shia for calling imams as infalliable but more or less unconciously we ourselves assign the same status to all sahaba without speaking it from our mouth.This is unjust and unfair.

you need understanding " Wardi Wala : ITS NOT HADIS its the person who is follower of dress of Sunat and Quran not the one wardi wala which are belongs to Army or police or other .......

anyhow regarding the Imamat i already made clear to you and it is according to Quran which is without any doubt and debate will go on such issue which are in doubt here things are clear and very clear without any ahadis or points , there are thousand of ahadis fabricated and become authentic for sects and no one did little efforts about their Ravis and truth.

regarding the Silasil all silasils goes to Allah

"MAQSAD AIK HA ZARIAYA KOI BHI HO SAKTA HA "

Sahaba also followed the same path which is difine in Islam and under the fregnent roof of APP ASALATO ASLAM TEACHINGS. NN

The Messenger of Allah said:“If you see the Black Banners coming from Khurasan go to them immediately, even if you must crawl over ice, because indeed amongst them is the Caliph, Al Mahdi.” [Narrated on authority of Ibn Majah, Al-Hakim, Ahmad]

Abu Abdullah Nuaim Ibn Hammad on a chain of transmission on the authority of Al Zuhari who said ” The black flags will come from the East, led by mighty men, with long hair and beards, their surnames are taken from the names of their home towns (i.e. Khosti or from Khost etc.) and their first names are from a “Kunya”(Asmal Masalik Lieyyam Mahdiyy Maliki Li Kull-id Dunya Biemrillah-il Malik, Qalda bin Zayd)

@NN:i dont want to go into a long debate,but the last thing i would say that there are things in sahi bukhari and sahi muslim which shias can and do use to prove themselves right and there are things in their books asool al kafi etc which sunnis can and do use to prove themselves right.there is a margin of debate and flexibility on both sides.

@anonymous:go and check again.check the post "Pakistan,a great scheme of God" on this blog and check the scan page 201 of that post (which has been mentioned as 202,203 by author as a mistake) it is written that author was ordered to pay special attention to both afghanistan and Iran.and that order was given in 1984 when shia revolution in Iran had almost completed.

"And those who annoy believing men and women undeservedly, bear on themselves the crime of slander and plain sin.'' (33:58)

1559. Ibn Mas`ud (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said, "Reviling a Muslim is Fusuq (disobedience of Allah) and killing him is (tantamount to) disbelief.''[Al-Bukhari and Muslim].

Look at this Hadith. He will unite Arabs and Iran..."Surely, a man from my children will come near the Hour(at a time) when the hearts of believers died just as their bodies died through harm, hunger, murder, continuous trials, great battles, the death of the Sunnah, the revival of innovations, abstention from honoring good and forbidding the prohibited that pursued them. Then, through Al Mahdi, Muhammad the son of Abdullah, Allah will revive the Sunnah that died and he will please with his justice, and the hearts of the believers will be blessed. Groups of PERSIAN and ARAB tribes will UNITE because of him, and so he will remain for some years, which are but a few, then die."

"A black banner will come, belonging to Banul-'Abbas. Then, from Khurasan will come another one, also black. Their turbans will be black and their garments white. At the head of their army will be a man called Shu'ayb ibn Salih ibn Shu'ayb, from Tamim. They will defeat the companions of the Sufyani until he [i.e. Shu'ayb ibn Salih] settles in Bayt al-Maqdis, preparing the way for the Mahdi's rule. Three hundred men from Sham will help him. Between his coming and the handing over of the rule to the Mahdi will be seventy months."

And he also narrated from Sa'id ibn al-Musayyib that he said: "The Messenger of Allah [sallallahu 'alayhi wa-sallam] said:

"Out of the east will come black banners belonging to Banul-'Abbas, then they will remain as long as Allah wills, then small black banners will come out against a man from the descendents of Abu Sufyan and his companions, from the east. They will give their obedience to the Mahdi."

And he also narrated from al-Hasan that he said:

"A man will come out of ar-Rayy, sturdy and light-brown in complexion, a mawla [non-Arab ally] of Banu Tamim, a man with a thin beard growing only on his chin, called Shu'ayb ibn Salih, among four thousand with white clothes and black banners. At the head of his army will be the Mahdi. All who meet him in battle will be struck down by him."

Ar-Rayy is a city in Persia located near present-day Tehran.

And he also narrated from 'Ali [radhiyallahu 'anhu] that he said:

"When the cavalry of the Sufyani comes to al-Kufah, he will send them in pursuit of the people of Khurasan. The people of Khurasan will come out, looking for the Mahdi. Then, he and the Hashimi will meet with a group of people with black banners, at their head Shu'ayb ibn Salih. Then he and the followers of the Sufyani will meet in battle at the gate of Istakhar, and a fierce battle will be fought between them. The black banners will be victorious, and the cavalry of the Sufyani will flee. When that happens, the people will wish for the Mahdi (to appear) and await him."

Istakhar is an ancient ruined city in Persia.

So it is my guess Sufyaani will attack to people of Khurasaan (Iran/Afg/Pak) from west of Khurasaan i.e Syria but at Estakhr he will be defeated by Shueb bin Saleh of ar-Rayy using help of Pakistan and Afghan. (Allah Knows Best)

Sahabah (R.H) became infidel by denying the divine right (Wilayat) of Hazrat Ali (ra). First three caliphs and other Sahabahs became infidel by denying the divine right of (Wilayat) of Hazrat Ali (ra). (Asool Kaafi, Page No. 420)

"Do not curse my Companions. If any of you were to spend the weight of Uhud in gold, it still would not reach the measure (mudd) of one of them nor even one-half of it." (Bukhari, Tirmidhi, Abu Dawud and Ibn Majah)

Shia say:

Imams are God (Jila-ul-Ayoun, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 85)

he Imam possesses more attributes than a Prophet. (Usool Kaafi, Vol.1, p. 388)

bette to close this chapter here , since you are commenting on things which are not part of history , where Quran is saying something else for them , so where you authenticty will fall ?

just Sahi Bukhari or any other book ??????????Even i say in broder sense that Khilafat of Ameer Mauvia is the Will of Allah and App Asalat to Aslam gave this BASHARAT and Hazrat Ali also gave this news and acknowledged this, and i beleive Allah's will and Amar Ilahi is always true and decided. NN

@Faisal:Mention the line where i have cursed any companion!!!!mention it.Allah's curse is upon liars.And as far Dr.Israr is concerned he said it and in response to his speech full of nasabiyat, Dr. Tahir Ul Qadri deleverd a speech of a total of 11 hrs in two parts,with more than 80 references proving Dr.Israr's twisted references as false ones.

@NN:Where did Quran say anything about Muavia bin Abu Sufyan.He was'nt one of sabiqun al awwalieen.It is reported that he and his father abu sufyan accepted Islam on the conquest of Makkah.And as far as wrong allegation is upon me of cursing the companions,this is just the inner guilt of a nasibi.Muavia bin Abu Sufyan incited Hazrt Saad Bin Abi Waqas to curse Hazrat Ali.Upon which hazrat Saad got furious and explained merits of Syedna Ali alaye hi salam.(Tirmidhi)If this reference is wrong ,you an behead me.And as far cursing on Yazeed is concerned ,Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal RehmatUllahi alaye hi cursed him,Imam Abu Hanifa neither supported nor did condemn but there is a silence over this issue according to him.So cursing Yazeed is legitimate.Only those hypocrytes who are followers of Zakir NAik NAsibi have love for Yazeed and call Karbala a political battle of two princes NAuzbillah,AstaghfirUllah.This video is available on youtube as well.

It is very sad that when Maududi revealed the truth in his famous book "Khilafat o Mulukiyat" those hypocryte people who had portrayed him as a hero,started giving fatwas on him.Those hypocrytes who had bughz e Ali alaye hi salam in their hearts.Why did Banu Umayya (after HAzrat Usman RaziAllah anhu) keep cursing Ali alaye hi salam and his descendants in sermons of jumma and Eid ,on the pulpit.They forced people to listen it,until HAzrt Umar bin abdul aziz stopped this culture.It is in authentic history books and no sunni or shia can deny it

@NN:There is'nt such a hadees which mentions khlafat of Muavia.Rather RasulAllah Salla'l la ho alaye hi wasallam said :"After me khilafat will remain upto 30 years,then there will be monarchy .......contnd"and 30 years count upto exactly the era of 6 month long caliphate of Syedna HAssan alaye hi salam.This means that muavia was'nt included.Allah says in Quran"Allah's curse is upon liars"It is mentioned in history that Muavia called for HAzrat Abdullah Ibn e Umar and Hzrt Ibn e Abu Bakar and asked them to announce openly that they had given oath of sincerity to Yzeed.These two refused to do so and returned to MAdina.After they had gone,Muavia came on pulpit and announced that they have given oath whereas they had not.Now what is this?Muavia advised Yazeed MAl'uun that get hold over Hussain alaye hi salam and Hazrat ibn e Zubair strictly.Did'nt he know that how dear were Ali and Hussnain e KAreemain alaye him salam to PRophet Salla'l la ho alaye hi wa aalihi wasallam?

Conclusion :There are 41 orders of wilayat 40 authentically spring from Syedna Ali alaye hi salam.in the remaining one,there are different opinions.What do you think that why was he given such an honour?Because he was capable of it.If you notice one thing,Sufiya had extreme patience and tolerance so what wil be the level of patience of that honourable Master of Tasawwuf who was the dearest to Prophet Salla'l la ho alaye hi wasallam according to the traditions reaching to us?He was such a kind and affectionate person who did'nt use abusive language in response of muavia and marwan etc. and neither did he curse them in response of their cursing in sermons, from pulpits.Have you ever heard any wali fo our age mentioning the name of muavia in their gatherings?no,and neevr will you find until you force them or ask them.But you'll surely find the rememberance of Ali alaye hi salam and HAzrat Abu Bakar,Usman,Umar,Zubair etc.and in the most of the gatherings,remmeberance of Ali alaye hi salam will be far more than any other companion. Go and check it yourself.

@NN:there's a verse in Quran the meaning of which is "Say O Prophet (salla'l la ho alayae hi wa aalihi wasallam),i do not ask you of anything except the love of my ahl e bayt (alayaehim salam ajmaeen)"and did'nt He announce in LAst Pilgrimage "I am leaving amongst you two things.!-Quran 2-My ahl e bayt These two will arrive together at Hauz e Kausar to me"(Muslim,Bukhari)Did'nt he say that whosoever kept the bughz of my ahl e bayt,he kept my bughz and whosoever kept their love he kept my love"Then those people who cursed noble personalities of ahl e bayt alayehim salam,what would you call them?

and as far the blame is on me that i'm not a murid of Maulana Sheikh Nazim QaddasAllahu Sirrahul Aziz,i dont care what people say as ther words dont affect the reality.These are the same people who claimed that Zaid Hamid ,the right hand of a KAzzab,is the representative (khalifa)of Maulana.And later denied it by saying that somebody told me so.

Cursing is permissible in Sunni Islam if the one being cursed is alive and is clearly behaving as tyrants. However, Sunnis do not curse dead people because they feel as soon as a person dies-God administers judgement to them and it is impossible to change this. Sunni's generally don't curse dead people ---- wikipedia

1553. Abud-Darda' (May Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said, "Those who frequently resort to cursing (people) would neither be accepted as witnesses nor as intercessors on the Day of Resurrection.''[Muslim].

1554. Samurah bin Jundub (May Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said, "Do not curse one another, invoking Curse of Allah or Wrath of Allah or the fire of Hell.''[Abu Dawud and At-Tirmidhi].

1555. Ibn Mas`ud (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said, "A true believer is not involved in taunting, or frequently cursing (others) or in indecency or abusing.''[At-Tirmidhi].

1556. Abud-Darda' (May Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said, "When a person curses somebody or something, the curse goes up to heaven and the gates of heaven get closed. Then it comes down to the earth and its gates get closed. Then it turns right and left, and if it does not find an entrance to go anywhere, it returns to the person or thing that was cursed; if he or it deserves to be cursed; otherwise it returns to the person who uttered it.''[Abu Dawud].

""""there's a verse in Quran the meaning of which is "Say O Prophet (salla'l la ho alayae hi wa aalihi wasallam),i do not ask you of anything except the love of my ahl e bayt (alayaehim salam ajmaeen)""""

you are right , this is true aya but your understanding i make it more broader , Ahly e bayt according to Quran is all the family members and this specific word " Ahlay bait " also used in qurn with other Anbiya Alhya salam and moreover app aslat o aslam are RAHMAT ul LIL ALMEEEN all those will be considered in the family of ahlay bait bait who are follower of teaching our Nabi aslato aslam like belvoed Sahabay karam and Tabaeen and Taba Tabeeen.

Alhamdulillah, Ahli Sunnat wal Jamaat. We are on the way of our Prophet (saws) and his companions. We haven’t changed it. They have changed everything. They did as they liked, as it came to their minds. Meaning, Islam in the hand of Shi’ites is changed so much that it is not Islam anymore. They don’t mention our Prophet’s (saws) name but they mention Sayidina Hussain’s (ra) name.

They are so committed, loyal to Sayidina Hussain (ra), almost as if they idolize him, as their god. They cry and cry, they perform an endless mourning. But, they will not be given a chance. Astaizu Billah, “inna Allaha la yusilhu amala al-mufsidina” (10:81). “Verily Allah does not set right the work of Al-Mufsidun (the evil-doers).” He sets right the work of those who are on the right way..

Therefore, Ottomans raised the flag of Islam for 1000 years and kept the Caliphate. It was not given to Iranians. Allah has found our glorious Ottoman ancestors, Amin (trustworthy) and left the Caliphate to them. He confirmed them and they (Iran) got nothing. May Allah send the Sahibul Waqt.

The first ones that Sahibul Waqt will clean will be them. Then, they will say, “you are not Mahdi. You are not the Mahdi we are looking for.” “Am I not? I will inform you who I am!”

he one in power in Islam is Ahli Sunnat, not Shi’as. Our Prophet (saws) said, “ana wa man it-taba’ani” (Hadith). Who is with Haqq? Me and those who follow me. Who did Sayidina Ali (ra) follow?

Who did Sayidina Hassan and Hussein (ra) follow?

finished then! This is not a toy. It is the religion of Allah, not easy. This is enough.

Not only word curse is used in Hadith word 'abuse' or 'criticize' is also used in Ahdith. If you didn't send curse on Islamic Scholars then you abused them. Cursing, abusing or criticizing any dead person is forbidden in Sunni Islam.

HADITH:Abusing a Muslim is sinful,and fighting(making war, qital) with him is(tantamount to) kufr.Bukhari,Muslim

You indirectly curse Dr Israr Ahmed by saying he is Gustakh-e-Ali and by saying 'gustakhi karne waale munafiq hain'. So you declared him Munafiq.

Topic of his video was not Hazrat Ali (ra). Topic was about tafsir of an ayat. He only quoted ibn-e-kathir which is most authentic and old tafsir. I can show you deep love of Ali (ra) in his many lectures.... Tell me why people didn't say anything during 10 years as this video was 10 years old??? They did this only to stop his famous program in TV which was most popular program in Pakistan and India.

JUST LIKE FUTURE IS GHAIB (UNSEEN) PAST (HISTORY) IS ALSO GHAIB (UNSEEN). Allah gives knowledge of both future and past from His Ghaib (loh-e-Qalam) to only His friends (Aylia). We cannot find ghaib of past from historical books.

Please stop sectarianism...

When an Ansar and Mohajir got into a fight due to a joke played by the Mohajir and each called upon his people to help:

The Ansari said, "Help, O Ansar!"

And the Mohajir said, "Help, O Mohajirs!"

The Prophet [Sallallaho Alaihe wasallam] came out and said, "What is the matter and who gave this call of the period of Ignorance? "

Then he [Sallallaho Alaihe wasallam] said, "What is the matter with them?"

So he was told about the stroke of the Mohajir to the Ansari.

The Prophet [Sallallaho Alaihe Wasallam] said, "leave this for it is an evil call''

[Saheeh Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 56, Number 720]

Mohajir and Ansar were names given by Allah, when these beautiful names became the cause of dispute amongst the Muslimeen, the Prophet [Sallallaho Alaihe wasallam] termed it as an evil call of the period of ignorance.

Similarly is the case with names such as: Salafi, Ahle Hadith, Ahle Sunnah,Ahle Quran, Wahabi or Sunni etc, which seem beautiful in meaning but have become a source of dissension amongst the Muslimeen, so these names should be abandoned.

How long will this creating of names go on?

If the answer is no, then why did you need a new name before when we already had a beautiful name `Muslim'?

Watch out. Americans are strangulating economically the entire route leading upto central Asia by entangling the region in the Af-Pakistan controveries and in the euphoria of re-emergence of Muslims from central Asia. Their hedgemonic designs are clear in Baluchistan.

The Ancient Khurasan's central Image is the Ancient Bulk,Panj,Sogadia,till Indus river current Pakistan.Khurasan means land of Khuros buzerg,or The legacies of Sultan skandar Zulqarnain (Cyrus the great).The leading rule of the khanadan e Akhamanshis(Achmenians)will be there.Now those tribes living ni AF-PAK and central Asia whose roots are not Jews rather Achemanian will lead the anti-Dajjal forces and jews will join the Dajjalis.A blue eyed thick beard,strong physic man will advance against dajjalis from Taluqan takharistan and to chitral,Yaseen and then Gilgit-Baltistan.The initail main battle field will be Gilgit-Baltistan.

The Ancient Khurasan's central Image is the Ancient Bulk,Panj,Sogadia,till Indus river current Pakistan.Khurasan means land of Khuros buzerg,or The legacies of Sultan skandar Zulqarnain (Cyrus the great).The leading rule of the khanadan e Akhamanshis(Achmenians)will be there.Now those tribes living ni AF-PAK and central Asia whose roots are not Jews rather Achemanian will lead the anti-Dajjal forces and jews will join the Dajjalis.A blue eyed thick beard,strong physic man will advance against dajjalis from Taluqan takharistan and to chitral,Yaseen and then Gilgit-Baltistan.The initail main battle field will be Gilgit-Baltistan.