It took this long for the State to really address medically-necessary termination – so how long is it going to take for it to address the wider complexity of

THE ABORTION BILL put forward by Clare Daly was defeated by a remarkable 101 votes to 27 last week, despite the blustering showboating of many TDs following the death of Savita Halappanavar.

We need legislation to allow Irish doctors to make confident decisions on the care of their patients; there’s no getting around that. Our public representatives are aware of that. The question, really, is not if legislation will be enacted, but when. Ireland’s politicians will dither, waffle on about the need for reflection, and hop from foot to foot wringing their hands, their delaying the inevitable conveniently acting as a sort of political appeasement to those who would oppose the legislation.

In short, they’ll sit on the fence up to the point where they can claim they only moved because they were pushed off.

And this is for medically-necessary abortion: termination in cases where pregnancy endangers the mother’s life, including by risk of suicide. Many of those who are advocating abortion legislation stress this. Medically-necessary. Extreme situations. Last resorts. Abortion-on-demand, we are told, is a different kettle of fish entirely.

Even the term is loaded, isn’t it? Abortion-on-demand. It suggests unreasonable women stamping their feet until they get their own way, abortion as another facet of a culture of insufferable entitlement. Its structure dissuades objection, but all the same it begs the question: what’s so terrible about abortion-on-demand?

“Step in the right direction”

The idea of providing full abortion rights is a controversial one, but that women should be able to choose to terminate an unwanted or unviable pregnancy without having to defer to State guidelines should not be such a disturbing idea. Legislating for medically-necessary termination is a step in the right direction… in so far as you can call a couple of inches’ shuffle, a couple of decades too late, a step at all.

It will hopefully save the lives of gravely ill pregnant women, but it will not solve the problem. Thousands of Irish women will continue to travel abroad for abortions every year at considerable expensive, greater risk and significant stress. The stereotypical Irish woman travelling abroad for an abortion is a teenager or college student, a girl who “got herself in trouble”. She’s single, immature and selfish.

In the USA, three-quarters of women who chose to terminate a pregnancy cited concern for or responsibility to other individuals, three-quarters said they could not afford a child, three-quarters said that having a baby would interfere with work, education, or the ability to care for dependents, and half said they did not want to be a single parent, or cited problems with their husband or partner. Fifty-four per cent had been using contraception.

“Wanton disregard for the miracle of existence?”

Meanwhile, the National Abortion Federation has reported that 72 per cent of women who seek their services are already mothers, a figure that had climbed by 10 per cent since the economic crash. The implication is that an unplanned pregnancy is more likely to become a crisis pregnancy during times of economic stress; basically, that women and couples are choosing to terminate because they cannot afford another mouth to feed. Wanton disregard for the miracle of existence? More like pragmatism.

So that there is a significant percentage of couples and parents choosing termination should, if nothing else, show that the reasons women seek abortion are diverse. The next step is recognition that these reasons are valid, not flippant, throwaway excuses made by bad people.

And it is very easy to dismiss women who travel abroad for abortion as being weak or self-centred. The laziest method of attack is to claim that women dealing with a crisis pregnancy have only themselves to blame, that their downfall was in wanting to have sex without accepting the consequences. It is a very misanthropic view to think of a baby as a negative “consequence” and to believe that women should be forced into motherhood as a punishment for being lackadaisical about their fertility. Shrugging about ‘short straws’ is not a feature of a compassionate society. Nor is stipulating that an unwanted child must be born to appease the moral anxiety of people who’ll never meet it.

The human body works against us; that’s a hard, cold fact of life. Methods of contraception fail. People make stupid mistakes. Partners walk out. Foetuses sometimes cannot survive outside the womb. People are coerced into taking chances. Women are raped. In anti-choice arguments, none of these factors are of consequence. The right to life must take precedent over the rights of a life already living.

Abortion is not a pleasant concept. As a procedure, it is invasive and sometimes painful. As a life choice, it has complex consequences that are unique to the woman or couple involved.

Some people do struggle to come to terms with their decision. Some feel nothing but massive relief. No woman chooses abortion on a whim, and no couple choose abortion as the best contraceptive option available to them. It is absurd to suggest that allowing “abortion-on-demand” would lead to some sort of revolving door scenario where the loose and the louche would get termination after termination as an alternative to the myriad easier contraceptive options available to us here in Ireland.

Allowing individuals the right to choose the option that best works for them will not cause the irreversible degeneration of Irish society. It would simply mean that women who are choosing abortion anyway could do so in their own country.

Believing Irish women to be heartless harridans who need to be kept in check by a stern government shows a failure of compassion, understanding and intelligence. Given the reality that thousands of Irish women travel for abortion every year, assuming that Ireland is some sort of utopia for the unborn is even more ludicrous. There are many reasons Irish women opt for abortion, and none of them are capricious.

There’s a lot of talk from the anti-choice side about how Irish women deserve better than abortion, and that’s true. Irish women also deserve better than financial hardship. And car crashes. And cancer. Life is difficult, and so, Irish women deserve better than blanket bans on legitimate options because of the uncertain moral code of a minority of unsympathetic blowhards.

TheJournal.ie is a full participating member of the Press Council of Ireland and supports
the Office of the Press Ombudsman. This scheme in addition to defending the freedom of the
press, offers readers a quick, fair and free method of dealing with complaints that they may
have in relation to articles that appear on our pages. To contact the Office of the
Press Ombudsman Lo-Call 1890 208 080 or go to
www.pressombudsman.ie
or www.presscouncil.ie

Please note that TheJournal.ie uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. For more information on cookies please refer to our cookies policy.

Journal Media does not control and is not responsible for user created content, posts, comments, submissions or preferences. Users are reminded that they are fully responsible for their own created content and their own posts, comments and submissions and fully and effectively warrant and indemnify Journal Media in relation to such content and their ability to make such content, posts, comments and submissions available. Journal Media does not control and is not responsible for the content of external websites.