PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Perry appeals his conviction and sentence for murder. On appeal Perry
argues his guilty plea did not comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969), because he was not properly advised regarding
his waiver of constitutional rights. Perry filed a letter in response to the Anders brief. After a thorough review of the record, Perry’s response,
and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss Perry’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON,
SHORT, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.