it means that Drazard doesn't think that LeBron would be as dominant if it wasn't for his natural athleticism and size. Because of the way he plays the game with less fundamentals and mental side of things Drazard feels that if LeBron didn't have the athleticism to let him get away with a few things that he wouldn't be as effective.

In other words, Drazard is basically saying if you take LeBron's natural physical advantages away you'd have less of a player than you'd have if he focused on the more fundamental complete side of things the way Kobe does.

Basically Drazard doesn't expect LeBron to have the longevity of someone like a Kobe Bryant or a Steve Nash because his game to Drazard is based more around his athleticism and physical advantages rather than fundamentals and beating people mentally.

It's kind of like a boxer that fights with his hands down when he's 18 because he can get out of the way of the punches, but if he keeps trying to fight that way when he's 28 those reflexes and athleticism go down a bit and eventually he'll get caught.

So Drazard is saying that he doesn't think LeBron would be as dominant a player without his natural gifts and body and feels like LeBrons game will diminish severely once that starts to ween since he relies on it much much more in terms of his all around game than someone like Kobe who was very cerebral about when to use it and had many many other aspects of his game and thus still has a LOT left in the tank in the twilight of his career even without the athleticism of the past to still beat players that may be younger bigger and stronger than him.

Drazard doesn't think LeBron will have that same fortune based on how his game is based, that once he's no longer the "biggest" on the block, that his dominance will fade especially considering the fact he feels that it's where LeBron gets his confidence from and doesn't think he'll be mentally tough enough to deal with not having it. Because even having all those gifts he didn't want to take a game winner or initiative till last year, so to Drazard he's mentally weak as well. I believe that's all what Drazard is trying to say.

it means that Drazard doesn't think that LeBron would be as dominant if it wasn't for his natural athleticism and size. Because of the way he plays the game with less fundamentals and mental side of things Drazard feels that if LeBron didn't have the athleticism to let him get away with a few things that he wouldn't be as effective.

In other words, Drazard is basically saying if you take LeBron's natural physical advantages away you'd have less of a player than you'd have if he focused on the more fundamental complete side of things the way Kobe does.

Basically Drazard doesn't expect LeBron to have the longevity of someone like a Kobe Bryant or a Steve Nash because his game to Drazard is based more around his athleticism and physical advantages rather than fundamentals and beating people mentally.

It's kind of like a boxer that fights with his hands down when he's 18 because he can get out of the way of the punches, but if he keeps trying to fight that way when he's 28 those reflexes and athleticism go down a bit and eventually he'll get caught.

So Drazard is saying that he doesn't think LeBron would be as dominant a player without his natural gifts and body and feels like LeBrons game will diminish severely once that starts to ween since he relies on it much much more in terms of his all around game than someone like Kobe who was very cerebral about when to use it and had many many other aspects of his game and thus still has a LOT left in the tank in the twilight of his career even without the athleticism of the past to still beat players that may be younger bigger and stronger than him.

Drazard doesn't think LeBron will have that same fortune based on how his game is based, that once he's no longer the "biggest" on the block, that his dominance will fade especially considering the fact he feels that it's where LeBron gets his confidence from and doesn't think he'll be mentally tough enough to deal with not having it. Because even having all those gifts he didn't want to take a game winner or initiative till last year, so to Drazard he's mentally weak as well. I believe that's all what Drazard is trying to say.

Nah Jordan doesn't have that muscle to bulldoze any player like shaq and lebron did

and Kobe didn't either

When Lebron has an Open Lane to dunk everyone was watching him

cause its nearly automatic (AND ONE)

When Kobe and Jordan has an Open Lane to Dunk almost everyone tries to clog him just to stop the dunk

An all around player willing to take the last shot not to pass the last shot

and willing to take a shot even in the most difficult situation

Everyone can pass, can steal, can shoot and can block in NBA

if your talking about stats sure he has a greatest stats than jordan and kobe but kid I'm talking about ALL AROUND TALENT not stat for god sake

The first things you said had nothing to do with being an all around player.

Lebron has all around talent. He is an excellent passer, he can shoot, he can take to the rack, he can defend almost every position, play the passing lanes, alright on post defense, and now has an offense post game. Thats all around talent

Idk if you can't understand simple logic or you're a blind LeBron hater but either way I am done arguing with you if you can't have a little common sense.

The first things you said had nothing to do with being an all around player.

Lebron has all around talent. He is an excellent passer, he can shoot, he can take to the rack, he can defend almost every position, play the passing lanes, alright on post defense, and now has an offense post game. Thats all around talent

Idk if you can't understand simple logic or you're a blind LeBron hater but either way I am done arguing with you if you can't have a little common sense.

I get what Drazard is saying, basically Kobe and MJ were like perfect basketball players they had no flaws in there game at all but Lebron fills up the stat sheet better than the both of them but from a skills stand point he is not the same as them. I think the difference is all around talent which Lebron has like your saying and an all around highly skilled game like I think Drazard is trying to say.

The first things you said had nothing to do with being an all around player.

Lebron has all around talent. He is an excellent passer, he can shoot, he can take to the rack, he can defend almost every position, play the passing lanes, alright on post defense, and now has an offense post game. Thats all around talent

Idk if you can't understand simple logic or you're a blind LeBron hater but either way I am done arguing with you if you can't have a little common sense.

Pal you're the one who doesn't have common sense

you can't just accept the truth

I get what Drazard is saying, basically Kobe and MJ were like perfect basketball players they had no flaws in there game at all but Lebron fills up the stat sheet better than the both of them but from a skills stand point he is not the same as them. I think the difference is all around talent which Lebron has like your saying and an all around highly skilled game like I think Drazard is trying to say.

I get what Drazard is saying, basically Kobe and MJ were like perfect basketball players they had no flaws in there game at all but Lebron fills up the stat sheet better than the both of them but from a skills stand point he is not the same as them. I think the difference is all around talent which Lebron has like your saying and an all around highly skilled game like I think Drazard is trying to say.

He may not be as fully talented as Kobe and Jordan, not many are. But he still has all around talent unmatched by many.

I get what Drazard is saying, basically Kobe and MJ were like perfect basketball players they had no flaws in there game at all but Lebron fills up the stat sheet better than the both of them but from a skills stand point he is not the same as them. I think the difference is all around talent which Lebron has like your saying and an all around highly skilled game like I think Drazard is trying to say.