On 4 Oct 2011, at 12:03, William Waites wrote:
> What if we *did* have names for assertions? We could construct graphs
> (collections of assertions) using these names... If we interpreted the
> fourth column in this way, what would happen?
There was a looong conversation between me an Bob Ferris on public-rdf-comments about exactly this question, starting here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2011Sep/0005.html
You might want to read it and let us know if you reach a different conclusion
Best,
Richard