Norway Divided by Plans of War Memorial Over Nazi Soldiers

Red Cross Norway has come up with a polarizing initiative to raise a monument over the graves of the Nordic country's Nazi soldiers, as a place of remembrance for their descendants.

During WW2, more than 800 Norwegian volunteers lost their lives serving in Hitler's Waffen SS during the war. Their graves are spread across large areas of Eastern Europe. Many have never been found at all.

Citing the Geneva Convention, Mads Harlem, the head of Red Cross Norway's legal team, argued that the Norwegian authorities have the responsibility to ensure that all those who have lost family members in combat must have a place to remember the fallen, regardless of what side they fought for.

According to Red Cross Norway, by WW2 the country had obligations similar to those we find today in Article 17 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, which states that the fallen should be buried in a way which will always allow them to be found again.

"We brought this up with the Ministry of Culture in 2009. The case was sent to the Foreign Ministry. Its response indicated that the management of war graves also applies in peacetime, but nothing has happened. The Red Cross believes it is important that Norway now takes these commitments seriously," Mads Harlem told the Verdens Gang daily.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, this proposal triggered many critical reactions in a country that suffered as a Nazi puppet state under the reviled leadership of Vidkun Quisling for over five years. Not only was the political leader of the regime executed following the nation's liberation, but the word "quisling" subsequently became a byword for "collaborator" or "traitor" in several languages.

Head of the Norwegian Home Front Museum Ivar Kraglund said he failed to see the Norwegian authorities' responsibility for establishing such a memorial, which should be more of a private matter. "Should the Norwegian authorities do it, I woudn't find it natural," Kraglund said.

Terje Emberland, senior researcher at the Holocaust Center and a historian of the Nazi invasion of Norway, was also highly critical.

"These were Norwegians who volunteered to join the Waffen SS to fight for Nazi Germany, a foreign military force that led a barbaric race war to the extinction," Emberland said. "It's understandable that the descendants would want a memorial for their ancestors, but this is something they must take private responsibility for," he added citing a private memorial in Bamble raised in the 1970's.

Emberland recalled the memorial dedicated to Norwegians who joined the international brigades fighting Franco's nationalists in Spain in 1930s, which was financed by the trade union movement. According to Emberland, public funding would "launder" the Norwegian Nazi volunteers.

Sven Arntzen, a professor of practical philosophy at the University College of Southeast Norway, argued that the government should avoid from contributing to such a memorial.

"Norwegians who supported Germany during WW2, through struggles within German forces, membership in the NS or otherwise, contributed, knowingly or unknowingly, to the most abominable monstrosities in human history," Arntzen wrote in an opinion piece in Dagbladet.

According to Arntzen, giving an impression of honoring those would be a mockery of Norwegian Jews and a mockery of Norwegians injured and killed in the battle against the lawless, violent and merciless regime.

Eirik Veum, the author of the controversial books "Those Who Fell" and "Your Honor Was Fidelity" about Norwegians killed in Nazi German war service, was more supportive of the initiative.

"Personally, I think the Red Cross has some good points when they think the left behind Norwegian SS soldiers should have a place of remembrance," Eirik Veum said. By his own admission, he has met many descendants of Norwegian "foreign fighters," who felt sad and bitter over not having a place to go to remember their loved ones.

The German occupation of Norway began in April 1940 on the pretext of "protecting" the fellow Germanic nation from British and French interference. In reality, Hitler sought to gain access to Norway's secure fjord harbors for better control over the North Atlantic. Additionally, occupied Norway was intended as a springboard for Nazi Germany's conquest of the Soviet Union's polar areas, which never happened.

​A total of 11,000 Norwegians lost their lives either during the war or while they were imprisoned. Approximately 50,000 Norwegians were arrested by the Germans during the occupation. At the height of the conflict, there were over 300,000 Nazi troops in the nation, despite it then having only approximately three million residents.

Hello,
!

We are committed to protecting your personal information and we have updated our Privacy Policy to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a new EU regulation that went into effect on May 25, 2018.

Please review our Privacy Policy. It contains details about the types of data we collect, how we use it, and your data protection rights.

Since you already shared your personal data with us when you created your personal account, to continue using it, please check the box below:

I agree to the processing of my personal data for the purpose of creating a personal account on this site, in compliance with the Privacy Policy.

If you do not want us to continue processing your data, please click here to delete your account.

promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;

contains links to viruses and malicious software;

is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");

“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;

violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");

doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.

The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.