This was in the 1962MR on the 3rd Sunday of Advent. It was also in the Gelasian Sacramentary and in the Gregorian.

The verb accommodo is very cool. It means “to fit or adapt one thing to another, to lay, put, or hang on”. In English we have the word “lend”, as in “lend me your ears!” When we apply pietas to God, it means “mercy”. Visito if you look closely at it has a root similar to “vision”. Visito means basically “to go to see, to visit any one” but it also comes to mean “to punish” in the Christian Latin, such as the Vulgate (Psalms and Jeremiah). Think of “visiting” vengence oon someone.

SLAVISHLY LITERAL VERSION:O Lord, we entreat You,
attune the ears of Your mercy to our voice,
and with the grace of Your Son coming to see usilluminate the shadows of our heart.

This prayer reminds us that the Lord is coming as Judge. When He comes He will SEE us to the roots of our being. All things will be laid bare before His sight. At the end, all things will be laid bare before the sight of all who have ever lived.

Notice also the profound connection between “voice” and “illumination”. What we are talking about here is the logos which illumines the mind.

In the midst of this prayer, however, is God’s mercy.

We will get His judgment whether we want it or not. His mercy, if we ask for it, is ours.

REVISION A:
Incline the ears of your compassion to our voice,
we pray, O Lord,
and let the grace of your Son who visits us
bring light to the darkness of our hearts.
REVISION B:
Incline a merciful ear to our cry,
we pray, O Lord,
and casting light on the darkness of our hearts
visit us with the grace of your Son.

22 Responses to WDTPRS Monday 3rd Week of Advent: See ya’ later!

Revision B seems like a step backward in the direction of the “dynamic” (i.e. mistranslated) lame duck ICEL prayers that currently oppress the English-speaking Church. Revision A is obviously better and more faithful.

I often think that perhaps the most terrifying part of my judgment will be the realization on my part that I knew all along what was objectionable about my actions. I think Scripture says somewhere: “out of your own mouth I will judge you” or something to that effect. On judgment day I will condemn myself for all those things I’m letting slip by, for all that I pretend to be ignorant of. If there’s anything I cannot do I can always ask for divine assistance but I am even slow in that respect.
My self-comfort and my stupid optimism will be my biggest downfall. I wish I could be a hermit hiding somewhere by myself just waiting for the end. Everything about this urban life is just a bunch of vanity.

B’ s “Incline a merciful ear to our cry” is very elegant, almost Cranmerian, and scans better than A’s “Incline the ears of your compassion to our voice”, but I think B, although more poetic, is getting a bit into dynamic equivalence territory whereas A is a more direct translation of the actual Latin. That said, I can’t see why A then has to go for “of our hearts” rather than the correct “heart”.

B’s “visit us with the grace of your Son” seems to me completely off. It has put an imperative verb in place of what was an adjectival present participle in the genitive case, and has turned the sense around somewhat, by entreating God to send us this grace rather than having it coming to us with the Son (i.e. he bringing it with Him) which is the sense of the Latin.

Of course, I would a million times have B over whatever the unlovely 1970s ICEL product was.

Father Z is listing these merely as Revision A and Revision B, but I’ve discovered a way to determine which is the 2008 version prepared by ICEL and approved by all the bishops conferences, and which is the allegedly final version after the final in-house Vatican revisions.

Simply compare both with the original Latin. The 2008 version is the more literal and accurate translation; the 2010 version is the worse one. Has worked every time so far.

I think that revision A tracks better with the Latin, although I am not a fan of “incline” rather than “attune.” There is something missing in the movement away from attune. “Incline” seems to me to be a more horizontal or activa positioning, while “attune” seems to be be a more vertical or actuosa positioning.

In trying to become more faithful to the Latin, we must also look to the meaning behind the words. Clearly, the translations are still being influenced and are simply not fulfilling enough. While I am all in favor of the OF, celebrated properly, I think that the wholesale usage of the Latin may be what is called for, as I don’t see a clear move away from dynamism and a clear move toward accurate translation.

Perhaps I am being a bit harsh, but we have a RIGHT, according to Redemptoris Sacramentum, to the Sacraments celebrated properly. It is becoming clearer and clearer that either A) we must move to the Latin in the OF, or 2) we must simply assist at the EF where the meaning doesn’t change, because of the static nature of the Latin language.

A is clearly superior to B. Consider the order of the thoughts in the 3rd and 4th lines. A is strong and B is weak. It is impossible to follow the word order of the Latin original closely but the Latin prayer ends with the command “illumine!” and the final line of A starts with “bring light”. B makes a subordinate construction the main clause and puts it at the end of the prayer as the final thought. Is the prayer “listen and illumine” as in as in A or is the prayer “listen and visit” as in B. Version B is also stronger for making a clearer parallel with “our voice” and “our hearts”. But I agree with another poster who writes that the singular would be better.

God of mercy,
open your ears to our cries
and light up the dark places of our hearts
with the grace of your Son,
who will visit us and set us free.

Seems to track the Latin much better than the 1974 version, yet is much better English than either of “A” or “B.” Of “A” and “B,” “A” seems better in this case which would make sense if Henry’s theory is true that “A” is the vox clara trainwreck.

I have discontent with the language and how it butchers the meaining of the prayer and/or the translation. The two main parts (one and two) are the first two lines and the last two lines. Culpability overall is diminished in Revision A and B

In Revision A, part one has compassion instead of mercy. To me compassion, dulls down things vs. mercy. When one asks someone for mercy, we are asking them to love us and forgive us inspite of our weaknesses, in our case with Christ, SIN! Compassion can be shown to someone who does or does not care for themselves or yourselves. Using “compassion” takes out OUR responsibility to Him and ourselves as a component of the prayer. In addition, mercy implies US putting ourselves at the feet of Jesus. Revision B does mention mercy but leaves us with a meager “cry”. A cry for what?

As for part two, While revision A is more true to the translation of the Latin, Revision B is shoddy in its tense. It says “and casting light on the darkness of our hearts” where the original asks that it be done. The wording of B implies that it is already done, which is not true. Again responsibility on the people is taken away. We must willfully accept Christ and his graces to have light cast on our hearts. It does not happen if we aren’t receptive. On a minor note the last sentence asks Christ to visit us when He visited us anyways in accordance with God’s will and continues to do so in the Eucharist.

O Lord, we entreat You,
attune the ears of Your mercy to our voice,
and with the grace of Your Son coming to see us
illuminate the shadows of our heart.

So why is this Literal Latin Translation Superior? There is much more we are asking for and is contained in the true translation. First, by asking for mercy, we know we are sinners who need His salvation. Second, since we are asking willfully for his mercy, we want to willfully repent and have Him enter our hearts. Finally, this is fully compliant with the whole of Advent, whereby we are to be preparing ourselves to welcome His inevitable, unpreventable coming as the Word Made flesh. We know what WE must do and want to do it, need to do it, for Him.

Since you took the time to respond Father (thank you for that), so will I.

Since I’ve been reading this blog for a month, I’ve come to realize that our current translation of the Roman Missal is indeed watered-down where-as before I accepted whatever goes. So now when I read your literal translations vs. the ICEL ones (sometimes nicknamed “Lame Duck”) I realize how much is lost and how much responsibility is taken from us. Watering down the prayers or losing meaning is but one part of many parts that could explain today’s state in the Church. Now that I am re-emersing myself in my Faith I’m just frustrated with the state of things in the Church between resistance to the TLM, bishops who don’t sheperd their flocks, libealism’s/feminism’s still lingering influence, and other matters.

They are only crowbars? I don’t quite get the “prying the prayers open part” though. I will admit I misunderstood your level of criticalness/opinion when you do the translations. While I stand by my general opinion that the literal translation comtains more responsibility to the people in the prayer vs A and B, I definitely could have expressed myself much better or simply stated this general opinion/disagreement vs. saying their awful. I definitely need to work on (via prayer and conscience for the virtue of) being more prudent in my life.

Would I would love to do my own translation? For the joy of it yes, but alas my knowledge of Latin has shrunken to virtually nothing save “Grumio Ancillam delectat” which well, has an internal joke in it from my Gr. 10 Latin class (Cambridge Latin coure series from the University btw, excellent for classical Latin). I would like to study it again in my own time either through a course at my local university or online, or to buy the series again in future. Thing is right now I’m still living with the parents until I can gain meaningful employment (not an entry level job) post graduation and I’ve already made them a bit crazy buying theology books (Pieper, DeMarco, Kreeft, encyclicals and other Pauline media books) and such and getting back into the faith. I ask them for a Latin text series for Xmas or say I want to take a Latin course on my own time and I don’t think they will be happy.

As for me, I’m from Ontario, so my main language is English. French would be found mostly in Quebec and perhaps in some parts of the Maritimes (?).

And my decisions are based purely on the English. We tend to be nauseatingly imprecise and banal with our language, so I always try to vote toward exactitude and beauty. I agree with Aengus Oshaughnessy about the 1st choice: “Poetry, that is.”

Search Fr. Z’s Blog

Search for:

SHOPPING ONLINE? Please, always come here first!

Enter Amazon through my link. Click the image below (they took away our search box!). Fr Z will get a small percentage of what you spend. (Pssst - Can't see it? Turn off your "ad-blocker" for this site!)

“This blog is like a fusion of the Baroque ‘salon’ with its well-tuned harpsichord around which polite society gathered for entertainment and edification and, on the other hand, a Wild West “saloon” with its out-of-tune piano and swinging doors, where everyone has a gun and something to say. Nevertheless, we try to point our discussions back to what it is to be Catholic in this increasingly difficult age, to love God, and how to get to heaven.” – Fr. Z

YOUR RECENT COMMENTS

Fallibilissimo: I don’t know if I’m falling prey to Poe’s law of the internet here. I’m fully appreciati ve of the need for society finding solutions to and fighting the effects of glabal warming...

JonPatrick: All of our statues, images, and crosses were covered, even the little crosses on the flagpoles. After Jesus says in effect “I AM is my name” ; that is calling himself God, he...

Deacon Ed Peitler: Looking for reverentia l Catholic liturgies? Come to Front Royal, Virginia. You have your choice of St. John the Baptist Church or, if you child is lucky enough to get into...

Paypal Donation

Let us pray…

Grant unto thy Church, we beseech
Thee, O merciful God, that She, being
gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may
be in no wise troubled by attack from her
foes.
O God, who by sin art offended and by
penance pacified, mercifully regard the
prayers of Thy people making supplication
unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of
Thine anger which we deserve for our sins.
Almighty and Everlasting God, in
whose Hand are the power and the
government of every realm: look down upon
and help the Christian people that the heathen
nations who trust in the fierceness of their
own might may be crushed by the power of
thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ,
Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee
in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world
without end. R. Amen.

My "challenge coin" for my 25th anniversary of ordination in 2016.

Want one? I do exchanges with military and LEOs, etc. and you can make a donation.

I travel a good deal. As I get older, it takes more of a toll. My main airline - sigh - is Delta. Were I to get some Gift Cards for Delta, I could more easily upgrade for longer flights. I'm just sayin'. I'd be much obliged. HERE

New miscellaneous releases and events

Yes, Fr. Z is taking ads…

For example...

A great hymnal…

Because it matters what children read…

I carry one of these super-strong rosaries in my spare mag pouch! The Swiss Guards have them too!

The Swiss Guard have these rosaries!For the story clickHERE and HERE (esp. 18:00)

Because you don’t know when you are going to need to move fast or get along without the supermarket…

To set up a recurring, monthly donation via PAYPAL (even a small one) go to the bottom of this blog and look for the drop down menu! Do you want yet another alternative to PayPal? I have set up an account with
CONTINUE TO GIVE
Get a link to donate via CONTINUE TO GIVE using your smart phone.
SEND MESSAGE:
4827563
TO:
715-803-4772
They take a larger percent taste, but they are an alternative.

I remember benefactors in my prayers and periodically say Mass for your intention.

This catechism helped to bring Fr. Z into the Catholic Church!

Be a “Zed-Head”!

Fathers, you don’t know who might show up! It could be a “big fish” of one sort or other…

And... GO TO CONFESSION!

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

What people say about Fr. Z

"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism

"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank" "Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy" "the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
- Michael Sean Winters

"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco

“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment

"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha

"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment

"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous

Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment

Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine

RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on Twitter

“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed

Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes
- Paul in comment at 1 Peter 5

I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog.
- Tom in comment

More stuff…

Archives

ENTRY CALENDAR

Do you use my blog often? Is it helpful to you?

If so, please consider subscribing to send a monthly donation. That way I have steady income I can plan on, and you wind up regularly on my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I periodically say Holy Mass.

Some options

Admin Stuff

The opinions expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect the positions of any of the Catholic Church's entities with which I am involved. They are my own. Opinions expressed by commentators in the comments belong to the commentators.