Category Archives: European Union

The European Union members have some of the strictest Gun Laws in the world. All over the EU, for Law abiding citizens is it almost impossible to own a gun and even worst to carry one.

Most countries in the EU, like Germany and Austria for example, differentiate between “the right to own a gun” “Gun owners permit” and “the right to carry a gun”, “Hunting and Sports Guns”, and “license free (Category “C”) guns”.

Gun Owners Permit

Citizens have to obtain a so called “Weapon Pass”. After severe background checks, citizens have to make weapons uses and handling classes, take a test and IF the qualify they are allowed to purchase a gun.

BUT – they are now only allowed to “own” a gun. The gun must be stored safely (Police control at any given time without probable cause) and the storage rules at home are basically: The gun and ammo has to be both locked up and stored on separate places.

For example: Just in case you are the victim of a burglar, or rapist, you have to go first in one closet to get the gun out of a locked safe or case, and then go to another closest to get the ammo out of a locked case or safe, and if you are not raped or dead by now you are allowed to use it BUT MAKE NO MISTAKE – if you kill the criminal you might go to jail for “using excessive Force”.

Got to love uber-liberal leftist countries [if you are a Terrorist, criminal, murderer, or rapist]

Gun carry Permit

Is almost impossible to obtain, and extremely limited. Not even most Police officers, or Security guards, have a private gun carry permit. After duty they have to keep their guns in storage at work.

Sports and Hunting weapons and Rifles

Citizens need to have a hunting license and are only allowed to carry their weapon to and from Hunting or Sport shooting, and during the transport, again, weapon and ammo has to be separated. For sports guns in so called gun clubs, citizens either store their weapons at the gun club, or follow the same rules as mentioned in both categories above.

License free (Category “C”) Guns

Are Bibi-Guns, gas-airsoft pistols or any other form of bobby (Alarm) pistols. They are license free, purchasable after the age of 18, with registration by showing a valid driver’s license or passport or any other form of government ID.

And those “Category C” guns are now also the target of the European Union Commission as Kurier online, one of the largest Austrian Newspapers, reports this morning.

After “Charlie Hebdo attacks”, “the Friday 13th November 2015 Paris attacks” committed by Islamic terrorists and now the Cologne Sex attacks by Refugees and other criminals mostly with refugee status the European Union now decides to “Protects” its law-abiding citizens better by taking away their ability to protect themselves.

Their claim is that Bibi-guns, gas-airsoft-pistols can be manufactured into hot deadly weapons and they have to take away those weapons to avoid more terrorist attacks.

———————————————

According to Kurier, the new regulations are tougher then tough and affect also Hunters, Sports shooters, and gun collectors.

The European Union claims that this is a reaction to the Paris attacks. A tighter gun law should embank terrorism. In reference to the 13th November IS-Terror-attack the European Union Commission calls this move a “command of the hour”. Tightening up the purchase, ownership, and import of civilian guns must take place.

Both Terrorist attacks, Charlie Hebdo as wells as the attack in Paris in November 2015, have NOT been committed with altered Bibi-Guns but with illegal smuggled fully automatic firearms. Those fire arms that are NOT available to purchase in Europe. Neither fully nor semi-automatic.

One CAN NOT purchase a semi-automatic AK-47, AR-15 or any other weapon like this. Those guns fall under the “War-Gun-Laws” and are highly illegal.

All Terrorists had those guns smuggled illegally to Europe. And no sensible terrorist would use an altered “Gas-Pistol”, or has anybody ever heard of a Terrorist using a Gas-Pistol?

And MOST CURTAINLY – TERRORSTS AND CRIMINALS DON’T BY THEIR GUNS IN STORES AND GET REGISTERED.

Gas-Pistols are only good as immediate Self-defense weapon. At best for short distance, if a woman is getting raped or robbed, only to incapacitate the attacker for a short period of time in order to get away. They are NOT DEADLY.

I am sure many women in Cologne, Hamburg, Salzburg, Vienna and many other European countries (latest news talk of over 300 reported incidents and still counting) would have loved to have one of those.

But now European Union, instead of giving women better access and training on those guns, and/or small caliber weapons, in order to defend themselves, the EU wants to make its law abiding citizens even more defenseless using Citizens protection as cover-up to justify their protection of criminals, Terrorists and other thugs.

Their [EU] solution to protect Citizens (NOT)

Stay away in arm’s length of refugees and other Islamic immigrants (Henriette Reker, Mayor of Cologne).

Oh and don’t forget you might also not wear any sexy or otherwise figure pleasing cloth you could offend the religious feelings of Islamists (Editors Interpretation of 1))

The chief of Police of Salzburg actually thinks woman should only go out in company.

By the way – WHERE ARE THE LOUDMOUTHED LEFTIST FEMINISTS HERE?

Let’s face it Police is more busy to protect the Governmental “Open-Border-Political-Correctness-La-La-Policy” then law-abiding citizens. Cologne is the living proof of this.

Some news report that reports have been held back and orders are given to “avoid” cultural clashes (whatever that means).

Like I said – European Union, a dreamland for Terrorists and Criminals.

If you wonder where Obama and his leftist gun grabbers get their ideas from, well here is the answer.

The European gun laws and the new proposed regulations are basically what the United Nations demands since years. Unlike most Americans, Europeans worship the UN like a religion.

A naughty little beggar having evil thoughts here.

The resentment against the invasion of millions of undocumented immigrants and refugees grows rapidly in Europe. Despite the politicians hearing this they don’t care at all.

European policy of elected politicians states “We hear the problems of our constituent and are aware that we have to perform a better elucidation”. Or translated: “We hear you don’t like it but will indoctrinate or shut you up anyway”.

Europeans are highly fed up with their government that seems to care more about the political correctness and feelings of Muslims then the angst and fear of their citizens. In addition the governmental propaganda of “Welcome culture” does not work anymore.

Why this move on guns. It CAN NOT BE to lower the risk of Terrorism since even the dumbest politicians should know that terrorists and criminals don’t obey gun laws.

Or is it to disarm citizens to avoid a long overdue revolution? You be the judge of this.

For a month the turmoil’s also known as “Arab Spring” has reachedSyria. President Bashar al-Assad battles with the upmost brutality.

Thousands of dead protesters shock the world and the ultra liberal Europeans don’t seem to understand why nobody is willing to take action against the tyrannical dictator.

As usual the European Leftist media launches the standard accusation against the United States and the United nations, claiming that they don’t care about the dead because Syria has no oil to offer. Unlike Libya who is one of the richest countries in Oil and gas resources.

Europe is the largest business partner inLibya, Europe obtains the majority of its oil and gas needs (Austria for example a total of 25% of its Oil and Gas needs) from Libya.

The United States is only allowed to pay for the War they fight on behalf of the hypocritical Europeans.

But back to Syria and the claim nobody seems to care about the dead protesters and the genocide produced by the local government. Claiming economical interest or the lack of the same is way too easy and way too far from reality.

The truth is that politics is like a chess game. And every chess player knows one always thinks three moves ahead. And that is the real reason why the United Nations cannot surmount itself to harsher sanctions against Syria.

Syria is already a financially and economically challenged country and lives mostly on its banking system, providing the bank accounts not only for Saudi Countries, but also for Iran. Iran has tough UN resolutions on their back and cannot, like any other country, perform its business publically.

Syrian Banks provide the opportunity forIran to buy and sell all kinds of goods from Russia, China, and other Iran-friendly countries, performing and processing bank services. That also includes payments from and to Terror organizations.

Also, Saudi Arabian Countries finance “questionable Groups” through Syria. Payments Saudi Countries do not want the U.S.to know about in order not to jeopardize their Oil business. Criminalists would call it money laundering.

And then there is the United Nations and here is the chess game that comes in.

Between Syria and Israel is the so called UNDOF unit. United Nations Disengagement Observer Forces, with order to protect and uphold the weapons hold status between Syria and Israel.

But the UN is not an occupant and is only there because Syria agreed to it in a contract, which means if Assad feels betrayed by the UN he can easily and without giving any explanation withdraw the permission to have this unit on his soil and that would be devastating for the UN and their radical upcoming agenda in September.

Let’s play that through for the moment.

Eventuality 1:

The United Nations not only strongly condemns, but also punishes Syria for its genocide even threatening military action, and Bashar al-Assad withdraws his permission having UN peacekeeping soldiers on Syrian property.

That is what Iran is waiting for. 427,000 Palestinian refugees from Lebanon will immediately come over the Golan Heights smuggler routes joining forces with 478,000 Palestinian refugees inSyria.

Israel will have no other choice than to gather the majority of its troops on the Syrian border in order to stop the flood of Palestinians.

This is exactly what Ahmedinejad of Iran needs, claiming an Israeli attack on Syria, which allows him to come to the aid of his “Syrian brothers”.

Meanwhile, the borders to Gaza and the West bank are weakened and an additional 4.1 Million Palestinians (2.5 Million from the West Bank and 1.6 Million from Gaza) attack Israel seeing their chance to finally do what Hamas and Hezbollah dream of – the final destruction of Israel and the taking over of the entire country.

And if anybody thinks the remaining 2 Million Palestinians inJordan can be stopped they are a fool.

As of here the world has only 2 choices: Sit back and watchIsrael die or interfere with a combined force which will end in a long-lasting brutal war if not a world war or worse a nuclear war.

4,300 Syrian refuges are already inside Turkey, the Financial Times reports and thousands more are to be expected. In case of an outbreak of war on Syria those refugees could easily become guerilla fighters having enough support in a highly muslimized country like Turkey. The third World War would be on.

Syrian refugees in Turkey

Either way the radical UN Agenda of building a Palestinian state in September recognized and accepted by the world community is nothing more than wishful thinking.

Eventuality 2:

The United Nations keeps doing what they do best, hold meaningless negotiations and weak condemnations against Syria assuring that Assad is not too offended and the situation clears itself up.

That way their radical Agenda of building a Palestine State in September is not in jeopardy at all.

Bottom line is: European allegations that the world does not interfere because of lack of resources is nonsense.

The U.S. does not interfere because it is not our problem and the UN considers the slaughtered victims inSyria collateral damage for their higher Palestinian Agenda in September.

So much for a self declared humanitarian organization – United Nations

On March 7, 2011 – The French and the United Kingdom first pressured for the establishment of a No-Fly Zone over Libya, but backed down. As of this moment the military interference in an internal Conflict, commonly known as Civil War, was on the table.

The Arab league supported this Idea, but never intended to get involved by themselves just in case something went terribly wrong, and in a military conflict there is always a possibility to blame others.

On March 17, 2011 – the Unites Nations Security Council approved, from pressure of the French President Sarkozy, a military intervention in Libya.

This fungous declaration leaves a lot of room for interpretation and even more questions.

On March 19, 2011 – the First Air Strikes began in cooperation with Missile attacks from U.S. Battle ships.

President Obama has, illegally and without consent, sent U.S. Armed Forces into a conflict. Though he had plenty of time to consult with the Congress and call for an urgent emergency meeting getting Congressional Approval, President Obama decided to play Golf, pick his favorite NCAA team and travel to South America.

This action is not only highly illegal but also endangers American soldiers. Illegal because we have a constitution and the constitution is clear on when, where and how the president is authorized to engage the Armed Forces in a conflict without Congressional Approval.

The War Power Act from 1973 (2), established by the 93rd Congress after the Vietnam conflict was put in place exactly to prevent any U.S. President to engage the U.S. in a War without approval again.

More important than the Power Act is the United States constitution. Article I – Section VIII (3) rests the power to declare War solely to the United States Congress, and requires both the Commander-in-Chief AND the Congress to commit U.S. Troops; otherwise any Action would be unconstitutional.

Article II – Section II (3) of the U.S. Constitution sure identifies the U.S. President as the civilian oversight of the U.S. Military and Commander in chief, but does not allow him to use the Armed Forces to enforce its political will on foreign Nations.

March 22, 2011 – the first American Airplane, an F-15 Strike Eagle, crashes over Libya (4). And despite the statements from the Pentagon that this Jet was ‘Not’ shot down, but crashed due to technical failure the situation remains the same. According to UK Guardian the Pilots could not have known if the people who found them were friendly or non-friendly since they all were heavily armed.

F-15 Eagle Short Takeoff In Afterburner

Praise the Lord the Fighter Pilots are safe and well, but it could have been the other way around.

There are many questions that now rise from this situation. Speaker of the House John Boehner sent a few questions to President Obama concerning the American involvement in this “Action” I think he asked the wrong questions. So let me as ask a few here:

My first question concerns the UN Resolution – Gaddafi, Libya and the rebels

The UN Resolution declares “All necessary Measures to protect Civilians”. But what does that mean, who is a civilian in this case and who is a participant in an armed internal conflict.

In my understanding of the Geneva Convention (5) a person that is armed and participates in a violent action is not to be considered an unarmed unprotected Civilian and falls under the rules of Engagement.

Muammar al-Gaddafi should have been taken out 30 years ago. But it was the European Countries, especially France, Germany, Austria, Russia and so on who protected him and made him diplomatically eligible (6).

No matter what one thinks about Gaddafi he is the legal Head of Libya, his citizens have supported him for the past 30 years. Now the very same Citizens rebel against him.

I definitely agree and support the revolution, but this is an internal conflict and when the UN claims falsely that the western alliance is to protect “Civilians” this is a fraudulent inflammatory statement because as I mentioned above armed Civilians participating in a violent conflict are not protected under the Geneva Convention.

So here is my first question – why is the United Nations so eager to get involved in that conflict?

In my opinion the United Nations together with the French and the UK in cooperation with the European Union uses the U.S. Armed Forces to interfere illegally to overthrow a uncomfortable Dictator for economical (in favor of the European Union and NOT the U.S.) and political reasons (to strengthen Muslim radical groupings).

My next Questions go straight to the Situation of the American Soldiers.

The fact that we have never officially declared war on Libya raises many questions concerning the legal status of our Armed Forces.

Many Military experts and the NATO command already warn that, should the rebels not prevail, a Ground Force operation would be the next logical step. Taking a closer look at the fuzzy UN declaration the application of Ground Forces is not being ruled out. And that brings me to the point.

Since when – does the United Nations run our Armed Forces for their advantage? Since when is the UN in charge of our Soldiers? Ok you might say – sure since the UN puppet Obama is president – but where is the Congress on this?

What is the benefit – does that mean we now get access to the oil and gas of Libya or does that mean we spend American Tax Dollars (over 70 Million Dollars in the past 3 days in Tomahawk Missiles) to make sure the Arab league and the European Union gets the financial benefit?

What if – the fighter Jet Pilots would have been shot down, not in friendly but enemy territory? Since Gaddafi already declared that he does not accept the UN resolution, he could have considered the Pilots terrorists, spies, or God knows what and punished them at will, even execution.

What if – we send ground forces into Libya? What is the status of the conflict? Is this a Police Action, a war, an expedition – what?

And the question is not so far off because this question involves the treatment of the soldiers and their families when they come home according to the U.S. Veterans Affairs regulations.

Only Combat Veterans participating in an official declared War are eligible for the “War-veteran-Benefits” (7). Every military person knows that the benefits, retirement, and other social assistance for homecoming soldiers have a specific distinction – Soldiers in times of peace and soldiers in combat.

What happens – to the families of the fallen? Do they receive surviving dependents benefits of a soldier at war or the smaller benefits for a soldier in peace?

Remember we have never declared war officially on Libya.

Remember how long it took to accept the Vietnam Veterans legally as War Veterans? It took until 2003, under the Bush Administration to recognize veterans’ benefits for Soldiers exposed to Agent Orange (7). Or the legal battles on legally accepting the fact that Operation Desert Storm participants had been exposed to Chemical Weapons and grant the benefits for this. And it is confirmed that Gaddafi holds Mustard gas weapons.

What if – those F-15 Pilots would have been killed – what regulation would apply to them and their families left behind, since we are not at War with Libya?

Despite the legal constitutional aspect of Obama’s narcissist lone-ranger actions, where he thinks he can do whatever he feels like, once again I think he has confused his job description with that of a dictator. Here in America we have a democracy, a system with “Checks and Balances” a House body and a Senate body it is not a 1 man show; Apparently Harvard Law School no longer teaches the rules of our three branches of government.

I am sure there are tons of questions that can be asked but those are the ones that burn on my heart right now.

As far as I am concerned – all we can do is pray for our men and women in the Armed Forces for their safe return as they follow their loyal calling as Service members. God bless you and thank you for your service.

Pray that they all return home safe because our President in my opinion has not given any serious thought to this unauthorized action and its consequences.

Mr. President, Mr. Speaker of the House Boehner:

Would anybody please explain this to me or answer my questions? Since I am a citizen and a Taxpayer I am entitled to the answers.

God Bless America

Sources:
1) United Nations.org Press Release
2) Almanac of Policy Issues
3) Cornell University Law School
4) L.A. Times
5) ICRC.org
6) (The Hypocrisy of Europe…) tclehner.wordpress.com
7) United States Veterans Affairs Department

Before I get started I want to point out that this Column is not about Austria as a Country or the Austrian People. Austria itself is a beautiful country. It has tremendous historical sites to see, and the Austrian Citizens are good, friendly, and amazing people.

What this column is all about is the hypocritical brainwashing European and Austrian Governments who, just like the Obama administration, does not give a darn about the wish and desires of their citizens, but stubbornly defend, promote and indoctrinate their socialist/Marxist/already dead multiculturalism/terrorist loving politics.

These are the facts of European Hypocrisy and their desperate attempt to downplay their own failure on the Arabian politics and their desperate attempt to cover their fawning-over of Dictators even against the wish and will of the United States.

When Listening to European News Networks over Satellite such as N-24, or Austrian ORF, it is unbelievable how desperately they live in denial of their own responsibilities.

Listening to those European politicians, these days they sure admit that they might have “misinterpreted” the one or the other situation “but not without pointing the finger at the United States on all their alleged failures” instead of accepting responsibility.

The finger pointing against the United States has already started in order to cover up that the United States did not have any economical businesses in those areas nor did we have strong diplomatic relations in that region.

The entire cover-up is of course properly transported through Government owned propaganda TV stations such as ORF as well as ultra liberal newspapers (real honest and independent Newspapers are anyway not to be found except the FAZ in Germany).

And now, especially the left wing radical Newspapers and magazines such as NEWS and Österreich under the left wing radical owner Wolfgang Fellner, don’t want to hear anything about that. Now that Media act puffed up how official Austria could have ever talked to those dictators.

This is hypocrisy all the way, knowing that Egypt was armed and equipped with American Military technology because they were the only Arab country holding a military alliance with the United States.

The rest of those radical Arab nations with ties to Terrorist Networks have been under a ban by the United States, which gave the irresponsible European Union an opportunity to sell their weapons to them. And now they try to cover that up by blaming the United States.

Let’s get a few facts straight:

1) Weapons in that area

The weapon ban against Libya was lifted by the United Nations in 2004 against the will of the United States by pressure from the European Union.

Latest news reports that European Union Companies sold alone in 2009 weapons and technology to Libya, Bahrain, Palestine, Lebanon, Tunisia, and other radical Islam countries in a net worth of at least $ 474 Million Dollars U.S. Spiegel online reports (1).

Helicopters from Italy, Fighter jets from France and Germany, Communications technology such as Internet and telephone kill switches from Germany, side arms, assault rifles and unmanned drones from Austria, Tanks from France and the UK, Crowd control weapons (used against demonstrations and to repress opposition) from the UK and Kalashnikovs from Russia just to name a few. Russia alone has an ongoing Arms deals with that region in an amount of 40 Billion Dollar, in Libya itself, 2 Billion Dollars AHN News.com (2) reports.

As a matter of fact the standard assault rifle of the Tunisian Military is the Steyr AUG 77, reported among the top ten Assault rifles, and also used by the Australian Army and many special Forces in the world made in Austria.

Tunisia Regular Army mit AUG (Austrian Asault Rifle STg 77)

1) Social Acceptance of Gaddafi and his offspring

Less than a month ago they have cheered to Saiif al-Islam Gaddafi as a reformer, they have fawned over him whenever he was in Austria, his mother and sister have been well liked shopping customers in Vienna. Aisha Gaddafi was cheered in the Austrian left wing media as the “Claudia Schiffer of the middle east. Pointing out how beautiful and intelligent she was, showing strength against America when defending Saddam Hussein”.

Meanwhile, it was confirmed last week that while Gaddafi’s wife Saifya and his daughter Aisha were shopping in Vienna thousands of Libyan protesters were gunned down by Gaddafi.

Gaddafi’s son Saaif al-Islam Gaddafi studied in Vienna at the IMADEC University and in the UK, and was a well liked guest in Austrian Society, praised as a reformer. And though left wing liberals now mock against the diseased former leader of the freedom party Jörg Haider for his visits to Libya and his friendship to Saaif al-Islam Gaddafi, it was actually the former Chancellor of Austria Bruno Kreisky (3) that brought the known Terrorist back into the international community.

Saaif Gaddafi visited the Vienna Opera ball, an officiell Event hosted by the Austrian Federal Government, and holds extreme close ties to the SPOE and the Austrian Government as well as to the German Sister SPD.

It was Bruno Kreisky (1911 to 1990), chancellor of Austria from 1970 to 1983 that first made Muammar al-Gaddafi eligible in the international community and held close relations with him. Gaddafi himself calls him “My good friend Bruno”. The very same Bruno Kreisky that also made Yasser Arafat, leader of the Terror organization PLO, eligible and organized him to speak in front of the United Nations.

And let’s not forget Libya’s seat on the United Nations Humans rights council. Because of the acceptance of Terrorist Countries in that council, the United States boycotted them during the Bush administration, but rejoined them with Barrack Obama Fox News reports (5).

So why else do you think that Europe managed to give the slave to the UN and European Socialist/Marxist Puppet Obama the Nobel Peace Prize?

Libya got that seat, against the will of the United States, by a simple blackmail trade designed by the European Union… In order to get weapons and arms deals as well as oil and gas drilling rights for European Companies, especially Austria who was the one supporting Libya.

1) Business connections

It is also confirmed since 2011/03/01 that the Gaddafi Clan has 1.25 Billion U.S. dollars parked in cash in Austrian banks. It is also confirmed that the “Libyan Investment Authority” holds several shareholdings of Austrian Companies such as Wienerberger bricks and more.

The Libyan Central bank holds 5 % shares on the UNICREDIT Bank group, one of the largest banks in Europe with headquarters in Italy and banks throughout Europe, including the largest bank in Austria called “Bank Austria” (another socialist affiliated bank).

The largest Oil drilling company in Libya is OMV. OMV is a former government owned oil and Gas Company partially privatized in the late 90’s keeping the vast majority (25% + 1 share) in the hands of the Austrian Government. OMV is also known as being extremely affiliated with SPOE, the socialist Party of Austria. Two of the past three chancellors from the SPOE started their careers in the OMV.

Austria retains 25% of its Oil and Gas from Libya, and more than 50% of the remaining 75% is coming from Russia.

Austria was never shy to decry human’s rights violations when it came to protesting against the treatment of those “poor misunderstood” Terrorists at Gitmo. In Libya on the other hand Austria kept silent in order not to endanger its economical interests… The Gaddafi’s were well liked business partners.

So it is not a miracle that the current SPOE leadership around SPOE chancellor Faymann took their sweet time to freeze Gaddafi’s accounts and business connections calling on the European Union for guidance.

Or was it the hope of the European Union, as usual, that they would find a consensus on how to deal with Libya and still keep Austria’s business interests? Maybe the EU was hoping to reach some sort of agreement where Austria could “officially” avoid having to freeze the money and properties of the Gaddafi’s and then somehow return it to them when the dust settled.

No matter who will follow Gaddafi or any of the fallen dictators, it will be infiltrated by radical America hating Muslim groups. History has shown us that the naive hope things will turn to the better and democracy will be established is a misjudgment.

The countries are poor and the people are now expecting manna to fall from heaven and that the western world will flood them with money, but as soon as that does not happen radical Muslim Terror organizations like Al Qaeda and their pied-piper’s are going to have a feast.

We are talking about the European Union members here. Al Qaeda in Maghreb makes a living of kidnapping European Tourists and dragging them through the uncontrolled desert between Tunisia and Libya. From the ransom money they finance their Terror attacks on America.

The European Union knows about that and though, officially not negotiating with Terrorists, they had no shame in using Saaif al-Islam Gaddafi’s alleged charity foundation and Saaif himself to negotiate and pay the ransom. The fact is that the European Union finances Terrorism through the backdoor, which they apparently consider the lesser evil.

This happens with German tourists all the time and the latest was the kidnapping of 2 Austrian (5) citizens in 2008 or Italian (6) Sahara tourists kidnapped by Al Qaeda in 2011.

And the European Union has now the impertinence to put the blame of the northern Africa situation on us the United States. A situation they caused, it was the European opportunists who accepted and snuggled the past centuries with those Terrorists and now when it comes to taking responsibility for their idiotic politics they want to point the finger at us.

But that is normal for them: They want us THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to solve their problems and once we solve them we should get the hell out of Dodge and leave those Europeans the field of business.

Sure, with Obama that might work, but not with the rest of America. And Obama with the help of God Almighty will soon be history and a one-term president.

Did Obama screw the situation: Definitely.

When I asked on Facebook: Is Obama 1) way over his head on that situation, or b) incompetent or c) too dumb to handle it, well he is none of that.

He knows what he is doing. He is playing that regions economy right into the hands of the European Union and the radical Muslim Terrorists (see my previous column) (7).

Observing the Obama Administration on how they handle the crisis in North Africa makes one think that Obama, Clinton, and all the other morons are nothing but incompetent fools who have no clue what they are really doing.

Walk like an Egyptian

A fool who thinks Obama is a fool. He knows what he is doing. All he needs to do is sit back let the thing run its course and wash his hands in innocents.

Two words: Plausible Denial

It all started in Tunisia where Obama decided to take the position of “wait-and-see,” to Egypt where he totally failed to support any opposition to Mubarak in order to establish early enough American and Israel interests, and now to Libya where the United States had the recurring opportunity to get its hand on the Oil and Gas in that area, and push European Companies out of the way. And again Obama let this one chance opportunity slip through his hands.

Libya, if the situation down there wasn’t so dangerous I would cheer that I was the first Blogger who actually evaluated the situation in northern Africa correctly and predicted what would happen almost step by step.

In my column from 2011/01/21: “Tunisia the ignored Danger to America” (2) I listed nine northern African and Middle East Countries who would be the next to face revolution and a change of Leadership.

After the fall of Egypt on 2011/02/11 I warned (2) that our Government needs to take actions to preserve American interests in the outlook of economy and security and this is the moment to support northern African countries, help deliberate them, and install a America friendly Government cutting radical Islam grouping short. – BUT NOBODY WAS LISTENING.

At least nobody in the American government who had something to say, or was that on purpose and they ignored the warnings of me and all the other columnists on purpose?

Nine Countries with Dictators in charge and radical Islamic groups in their country determined to gain final power and access to the rich mineral resources especially the oil and gas resources that are a more powerful weapon in a world depending on energy resources than any nuclear warhead ever could be.

Each and every country hosts radical America hating and fighting terrorist groups within their own country.

From the highly active Al Qaeda in Maghreb (located in the no-man’s-land between Tunisia and Libya) in Libya who, until now, made their financial income of Terrorism with the Kidnapping of European Citizens living off the Ransom, to Lebanese immigrants in Jordan who hate Israel and America and yet build 70% of the Jordan population to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

Muslim Brotherhood

Up until now we have, at best, ignored those authoritarian contemptuous Dictators, and at worst arranged ourselves with them because as long as they were in power they kept the Terrorist organizations within their boundaries and under control. So the Dictators were the better of the two worst possibilities.

On the one side the Europeans, who have been in an economical cahoots with them in order to have access to their mineral resources and stay independent and competitive with America, and on the other side the United States who was until Obama came, pretty satisfied that Europe had those countries under control and we did not have to bother with them having enough to do in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and other radical Muslim countries.

The Situation used to be a win-win situation for all of us.

The European connections to Egypt and Libya:

Egypt was the first country to make a peace treaty with Israel and a military alliance with the United States being a guarantor that none of the Arab nations surrounding Israel would attack them and by prohibiting the radical Muslim brotherhood from access to the Egyptian government assured that this situation held firm.

And Libya is a whole different story. Libya is, or better was, controlled by Muammar al Gaddafi, a well known Terrorist who was responsible for the Lockerbie assassination.

And while the United States of America (at least under patriotic and responsible Presidents before Obama) had a ban on Libya and did not maintain diplomatic relations with this Terrorist, Europeans had been in bed with them all along.

European countries on the other hand maintained close relationships to those countries. Even worse, they actually fawn over those Dictators and their hedonistic offspring.

In my next column I show you the background of the European connections with Libya’s Dictator Family.

Switzerland, Austria, and the UK for example were the main bank connections for the Gaddafi clan to launder their blood money.

Libya and all the other Northern African Countries under Muslim Control are THE El-Dorado for European business. America does not have real diplomatic relations with those countries and except for Egypt no real business relations.

The Oil and Gas business is where Europe plays a secondary role to the United States and depends more or less on the OPEC prices.

Libya gave them some sort of independency and in exchange for acceptance, weapons, and technology Gaddafi allowed them to drill for oil and gas and secured the pipelines going through this country.

It is not surprising that European governments desperately defend the successors of the fallen dictators as “Non-radical Islamist” and do not get tired to point out that Muslim Brotherhood is not a Terrorist Organization.

In order to preserve their economical connections in the future they totally ignore that almost the entire leadership of Muslim Brotherhood is connected and in the top command of Al Qaeda.

“The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ’sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

Arming Rebels and Terrorist - take what you want it's free

For European governments it’s that easy because the liberal biased tolerance preaching media plays right into their hands and makes it easy for European Governments to blindfold their own citizens. They know if they acknowledge the danger that their citizens would be alarmed and the multiculturalism politics would fall apart.

The fact that the very same European governments refuse to accept the 5,000 refugees that have already landed in Lampedusa, Italy and the 1.5 Million refugees still to be expected proves clearly the hypocrisy of the European governments.

Officially they defend the rebels as non violent and non terrorist affiliated, but behind closed doors they know that the real status of those refugees can never be interrogated and the chances that a vast majority is Al Qaeda infiltrating is tremendous.

Obama

This would have been the chance for Obama to get rid of those Dictators and establish America friendly successors in that area. So why did he not do that? Why was he quiet?

The trick is in the refugee game. Austria, Germany, and the UK and other northern European Country’s have already denied the acceptance of Northern African Refugees from the current turmoil areas Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt, BUT the last word is not spoken yet.

France, Italy, Spain, and all the other EU countries with direct access to the Mediterranean Sea already called for help from the European Union Government expecting at least 1.5 million refugees.

The UN already established that the expected Refugees are a “World” problem calling on all European Countries and the United States to help. It won’t take too long until the European Union Council in Brussels decides that all countries under their control “HAVE” to take some of the refugees. And Obama, to be a slave to the United Nations, will be glad to do his share as well.

And this is how it works: take 1.5 million refugees and we all know that a large portion will be Al Qaeda infiltrators. Because of the chaotic system in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya their real status is impossible to investigate.

European Laws say that refugees cannot be held longer than 5 days under lock-down therefore their processing is a speedy one without proper interrogation. But once they have the status as refugees, according to the Guinevere Convention, they are considered “Persons of trace for humanity reasons” and they hold a special status which gives them the opportunity to move anywhere in the European Union they want.

And if Obama accepts the UN order to take some as well, how long do you think it is going to take for CAIR to pick radical Islamists disguised as refugees and bring them to the United States?

And all Obama needs to do is sit back in the Oval Office, claim the rebellion in those areas a local problem, call for economic sanctions in order to push for more refugees, and allow CAIR to bring terrorists to America.

And there is nothing we can do about it because Obama can claim those alleged refugees have been interrogated in Europe, no need for further interrogation, call upon humanitarian help, and any additional interrogation will be prevented by CAIR (filing lawsuits for racial profiling) and the damage is done. – WELCOME TERRORISTS.

And President Barrack Hussein Obama can play Pontius Pilate and wash his hands in innocents.

JOB DESTROYING AMERICA AND HANDING IT OVER TO RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS WELL DONE, Mr. OBAMA

This past week President Obama again has shown that his regards for his Country, the United States of America is close to Zero. Though looking at his actions lately I wonder what his country actually is.

After current President Obama traveled, accompanied by a royal suit of 3000, through India, visiting even a local Mosque, and again and again showing his compassion for everybody and disrespect to the United States of America, his wife, the first “Lady” Michelle gave America a ridicule outlook in the world, Obama joined the G20 Summit in South Korea.

This summit was at best a disaster for the United States. Obama failed on several accounts. Not only did he lose pretty much every currency battle to the Chinese, but also our so called European allies, lead by the German chancellor Angela Merkel, showing him no courtesy or respect whatsoever.

German/European news media ebullient cheered that finally the supremacy of the United States has broken and Angela Merkel rebuffed US initiatives to counter trade imbalances. (Source: BBC News (http://is.gd/hlpy7).

The Chinese press voiced fury at perceived US attempts to devalue the Dollar etcetera, etcetera.

You all read the News concerning the G20 disaster Obama produced – BUT

Here is my thought to you:

“What if the entire so called failure in Seoul was not a coincidence or bad strategy on the side of Barrack Hussein Obama, but rather a set up all along, and Obama lost on all accounts on purpose”?

(Let me get to this in just a minute).

During the entire Presidency of George W. Bush, and still today, the entire left wing controlled European media as well as the Left wing American Media have had a blast making former President Bush look bad. They’ve given him the stigmata of not being “the brightest President” the United States ever had and cheering Obama as such a intellectual gift to the World (the very same narcissist Gift to the world that needs two teleprompter to speak to 6th graders).

But then former President Bush

Never signed away U.S. American sovereignty to the United Nations and always stood his grounds for America first.

G.W. Bush always stood up to the Chinese and the Russians making sure the world knew what they owe us.

Under G.W. Bush the United States was 10 times safer than today and there have been 10 times less terror threats than today.

President G.W. Bush always put American interest first and never failed to answer to Trade wars in a proper way (Penalty tax for imports etcetera).

So, if current President Obama is so much smarter than G.W. Bush how come he was not able to take a stand for American interests?

If B.H. Obama is so much more liked in the European world how come the European Union has not shown a little more consideration to their protégée Obama?

Back to my thought

In 2009 just shortly after B.H. Obama got into office, he was awarded the Nobel Prize of Peace and the whole world was asking why, since he hadn’t done anything to deserve this prize. Now, here is the answer.

In one of my previous Blogs post on 10/11/2009 “Obama and the noble prize of Peace” (http://is.gd/hlwNe) I came up with the theory that, awarding this prize to Obama, was nothing but blackmail and bribery, or to be precise a “reminder on the socialist Agenda”.

Here are some facts:

While the European economy is rising at the moment, and the U.S Economy still stagnates, the Europeans face tough challenges. With Greece already broke and almost flushing the European financial stabilization, Ireland being the next in a financial crisis, and Portugal and Spain already knocking on the door, the European economy is anything but stable.

The Europeans need the export, especially to the U.S. Market in order to keep an ongoing cash flow and employment. Knowing that Asian countries like China and Japan have their imports extremely limited as well as produce a lot cheaper they are able to swamp the European market with low cost products and destroy European employment.

Obama borrowed Billions of Dollars from the Chinese to finance his Cap and trade program in the United States, and this way handed our economy over to the communist Chinese.

The Chinese are interested in buying General motors and other Companies who have been bailed out by Obama.

So the last thing the Chinese need is a strong U.S. American economy and an upward revaluation of the U.S. Dollar. That would mean they are losing control over our market.

Finally here to my thought:

What if – The European Socialist in cooperation with the Chinese cashed in on the Nobel prize of Peace, the previous given reminder, making sure Obama does not protect American interests and hands over our financial sovereignty as a first step to the long time UN desires – a new World order where the United Nation rules with the Socialists/Communists as the leading society.

What if – the entire summit was a set up; the negotiations are only for show and the outcome, already pre-negotiated, are to give the European Socialists and the Chinese access to our market. This way B.H. Obama can come back home, claiming “he did everything he could, but failed”, and still has accomplished his plan; preparing America one step closer to a Communist World Order.

On a final note

For rebuffing America and showing no regards and friendship to our economy Obama awards Angela Merkel the U.S. Medal of freedom in 2011. (Source: White House: http://is.gd/hmdwH)

I guess the puzzle finally produces a picture. If I am only close to being right, and the logical analysis of occurrences the past two years prove that I am, than may God in Heaven and our Savior Jesus Christ have mercy on America.

A lot might say England is far away. True – but what is important is the similarity in the partisan landscape. Just like in the United States England has a tradition of a 2-party system.

The Tories

The British Version of the U.S. Republicans – the conservative party (http://is.gd/bYD9q). For a long time the Tory’s were considered hardliners in their conservative beliefs. In 2009 the Tory’s became, with David Cameron, a new and young face with young leader who promised to lead the party in a new area of Conservative Humanity.

The Labour Party

The British version of the U.S. Democrats is a member of the EPS (European Socialists; Link: http://is.gd/bYCit). The Labour Party was, or better still is lead by Gordon Brown, who was the British Prime minister until yesterday. Ruling Great Britain the past 13 years under Socialist principles the Labour Party drove the empire into an economical disaster, and it is to be expected that in 2011 Great Britain will have a National Debt of more than 12% which is similar to today’s Greek disaster.

After the election on May 6, 2010 the British Empire is looking at a whole new ball game. For the first time in history the Empire has a third party elected and none of the traditional parties have gained the absolute majority (From Times online: http://is.gd/bYCT0).

After 13 years of disastrous ruling, the Labour Party lost the majority and the Torries gained the same. Unfortunately they did not gain the absolute Majority leaving the Conservatives 20 seats short. The king makers are now the third party calling themselves the “Liberal Democrats” under the upcoming Shooting star Nick Clegg which is the stirrup holder for the new Prime minister.

This is new to the British, and for the first time in history the Empire faces a common movement in European Politics – called: Coalition Government

Open Letter to the GOP

And here is the similarity to the United States as it is today. In a previous blog, under the title “Open Letter to the GOP” (http://wp.me/pF1Ot-2b ) I asked the question if so called Independent Candidates are an option. A lot of my friends disagreed with me, stating that at the end of the day Americans will chose the established party, though choosing young and upcoming shooting stars will represent the “conservative-back-to-the-roots” ideology, for safety.

However, many current representatives have left the established parties announcing they will run as independents in the upcoming midterm election.

The last one was the Florida Governor Charlie Crist who announced this week that he will run as an Independent Conservative hoping for the support of the Tea Party movement against the young GOP candidate and shooting star Marco Rubio.

A Newsmax.com poll asked readers who they would likely vote for right now and 46.38% of the participants would vote for a separated Tea Party under Sarah Palin while at the same time only 30.46% would vote for a candidate from the established GOP (Newsmax.com: http://is.gd/bYJP1).

Knowing this is not a public and representative Poll because Newsmax.com is mostly read by conservative readers, it does show the direction the conservative voters are looking at, at the moment. And yet among conservatives it is trend setting and shows where most of the conservative voters stand.

So here is my question that I would like to ask my readers

Many Americans are fed up and have had enough of Obama’s totalitarian Socialist Style, and with many Conservatives using the current Anger among the Citizens as a leg up for running as independent candidates hoping for the support of the Tea Party Movement so:

Are we looking at the possibility of a three or more Party system?

Is our country ready to make coalitions?

Our system is built on direct elections where we vote for the candidates directly and not for the party – how will that work if there are more than two parties?

A lot of my friends waved off this idea, saying, “This will never happen in America,” but yet the British probably thought so as well. What do you say now?

The key players in the Money laundering and redistribution Fraud of the UN are as follows:

African Countries and representatives of the African Continent

You might ask, what do they have to do with all of that? From January to November those countries run from one putsch to the next, one dictator supersedes the next one.

In mid November when the countdown to Christmas is opened and the hearts of the Christians are filled with love and compassion, Right on time, the ongoing Genocide stops and we are swamped with pictures of poor suffering babies and women to seduce us to donate. And yet there are many, many real poor countries, Africa is the world champion in collecting donations.

Private donations – Private people in the rich countries collect per year an average of 5 Million Dollars – This makes about 30 Countries who are participating in the private collection – 150 Million Dollars every year. This has been going on since the 60’s which gives us a rough estimate of approximately 7.5 Billion Dollars in private donations. With this money help organizations claim to buy food, medics, and construction materials. The distribution is going through UN channels and 65% of the Cash disappears in unknown channels. Another 30% ends up officially stolen by the Warlords where the UN, I am sure takes it cut from the black-market profit of those goods, and the remaining 5% actually ends up at the victims door.

That makes a total of approximately 4.9 Billion Dollars in almost 50 years of Private Donations administered by the UN. WHERE IS THE MONEY?

And this is only in the private sector. How about the official payments demanded in those summits.

The G8 (G20) meet 4 times a year and the Climate Gate Summit is once a year that makes a total of 5 Meetings.

In every meeting you do not see Asians or any other poor countries, no, only the African Countries show up with their colorful traditional clothes and traditional dances permanently demanding money and credit cuts.

Why does a continent that performs Genocide become a credit anyway, if not to buy weapons to maintain the war?

In all five summits are agreements of debt reduction and direct donations to Africa.

The debt cuts allow African countries to apply for more credit, just to assure in the next summit that these very same credits are cut again. In addition to the credit cuts they demand direct donations in the Billions by the western civilized world.

Putting a number to it we are talking about an average of 30 Billion Dollars every year since 1975 this makes a total of 1Trillion 20 Billion Dollars through 2009. That number is not too high since the European Union just made an agreement of 15 Billion Dollars for the official third world countries (98% goes to Africa) alone at the Copenhagen summit.

Now add the 1 Trillion 20 Billion Dollars officially, plus an additional 7.5 Billion Dollars from Private donations which is a grand total of 1.27.5 Trillion Dollars. Now consider that 60% of the money disappears in unknown channels, only 5% actually goes to the people, and the rest ends up as food, Construction Materials, or prescription drugs purchased by UN affiliated company’s that ends up on the black market ( http://is.gd/5p1Uh ).

Germany and Austria received a 100 Million dollar credit after WW2, also known as the Marshal Plan. That would equal an amount of approximately 1.5 Billion Dollars today – both countries have paid off their debt in full, including interest as of 2 years ago, and yet both of them belong to the richest industrial countries in the world.

Africa, on the other hand has no economy or industry what so ever. After over a Trillion dollars in donations they have nothing to show for it except Genocide and state of the art weapons that some western countries would love to have. And yet Africa is never forced to pay back anything or show any progress.

Responsible for the distribution of the finances and the credit reduction is the World Bank and the United Nations. And the UN is not accountable to anyone. There is no controlling the United Nations. Every criticism is washed away.

A third of this money comes from the United States of America. Imagine how we could lower our deficit by using that money for ourselves.

WHERE IS THAT MONEY? – WHERE IS MY MONEY

The World Bank

The World Bank was established in 1945 to provide leverage loans to developing countries for a capital program. The World Bank is strongly affiliated with the United Nations and now participating in more than 31 worldwide activities that have nothing to do with the traditional banking areas. For example: Conflict development, Environment, Gender, Health – Nutrition and Population, Information/Computing and Telecommunication, Law and Justice, Mining, Labor and social protection, Private Sector and so forth (http://is.gd/5lePI ). All areas where I ask myself what does that have to do with banking.

The European Union

The European Union was originally founded as an economical counterbalance to the free enterprise, U.S. Market, and trade organization system. Today, The European Union has 27 members, a combined currency, and their own defense force as a military counterpart to NATO. The European Union is strongly undercut in socialist principles where even the Christian conservatives are more or less having socialist agendas. The idea is the total control of every aspect of life, economy, and personal living. The European ideal is a centralized government that is in total control, including the media.

They control the media by undercutting them through credits. All banks are one way or the other in governmental control, and since every company lives off of bank loans and credits the governments use this opportunity to infiltrate the media so they can transport their indoctrination of socialism to the people. Another stronghold of the EU is the socialist Medicare that forces citizens to give away their private information.

The European Union has 2 headquarters and is strongly represented and connected in and with the UN.

The United States of America

The United States was founded on the principles of freedom and prosperity through hard work, as opposed to the European Union who believes in redistribution and punishment of hard work. The U.S. has always played a major role in the UN. Every time the UN has produced troubles in another country, or was diplomatically unable to solve a problem, they ask the United States to become the World’s Police force, on demand. However, once we solve the problem the UN and the EU blame us for our alleged “Imperial Interests”.

But the truth is we have the right to benefit first, once we have solved the problem.

The UN claims that we (The Unites States) owe them years of membership fees (yes it is true; in addition to all the donations we still pay membership fees). But let us do a little more math here. Considering what we owe the UN and what the UN owes us, for all the military actions we have performed under the UN Flag, the United Nations would owe us so much money we could reduce our Federal Deficit by 15 to 20%.

Those are 4 of the 5 major Key players the UN needs in order to control the world as Shadow Government. The UN itself, how this organization operates and controls and maintains its power, will be shown in my final Blog. And I will show you interesting facts there.