A Model of Consumer Learning for Service Quality and Usage

Abstract

In many services, e.g., the wireless service industry, consumers choose a service plan based on their expected consumption. In such situations, consumers experience two forms of uncertainty. First, consumers may be uncertain about the quality of their service provider and can learn about it after repeated use of the service. Second, consumers can be uncertain about their own usage of minutes and learn about it after observing their actual consumption. We propose a model to capture this dual learning process while accounting for the nonlinearity of the pricing scheme used in wireless services. Our results show that both quality and quantity learning are important. Several policy experiments are conducted to capture the effect of consumer learning, pricing and service quality on customer lifetime value (CLV). We find that consumer learning can result in a win-win situation for both consumers and firm -- consumers leave less minutes on the table while the firm sees an increase in overall customer lifetime value. For instance, we find that there is a 35% increase (about $75) in overall CLV with consumer learning than without. The key driver of this result is the change in the retention rate with and without learning.

More from the Author

On a beautiful sunny afternoon in October 2013, Daniel Mazon (GMP 15), decided to take some time out of his busy schedule of the General Management Program (GMP) at the Harvard Business School to reflect on his company’s situation. Mazon was the Vice President and General Manager of the Imaging Systems Division of Philips Healthcare in Latin America (Latam).
For three consecutive years, Philips Ultrasound business was losing market share in Latam. Mazon was concerned that sales representatives, who were responsible for a large portfolio of imaging products, were not giving enough attention to Ultrasound. He was wondering if change in the size and compensation structure of the sales force would solve this problem or he would need to take a more radical approach of creating a dedicated sales force for Ultrasound. This choice was complicated by the matrix organization structure of Philips where regional general managers (GMs) had profit and loss (P&L) responsibility of the entire portfolio.

In April 2014, Hector Guerra (GMP 16) was discussing his company’s dilemma with his living group of the General Management Program (GMP) at the Harvard Business School. Guerra was Vice President of Operations at Evans Food, a $100 million company, which produced pork rinds - salty snacks made out of pork skin - and sold at some of the largest US retailers such as HEB, Meijer, ALDI and Wal-Mart. In the last few years, the cost of pork skin had increased dramatically but Evans Food’s selling price to its customers had not kept pace with the increase in raw material costs. The company was losing money on some of the largest accounts but it seemed difficult, if not impossible, to seek price increase from multibillion-dollar retailers.

Within a few years of its operations, the Italian-based supermarket Eataly created a lot of buzz and excitement among consumers and media. Eataly's initial success was even more impressive in an industry known for its intense competition and low margins. How did Eataly manage to grow so quickly, and could it sustain its growth in the future?