How to Respond to Judicial Activism from the Supreme Court on Marriage, by Ryan T. Anderson

On June 26, by a narrow 5-4 decision, all state laws supporting traditional marriage were declared invalid by an activist Supreme Court. How should we react to such a terrible decision? For one thing, we should be reminded of the critical importance of electing a President who is committed to appointing future justices who reject judicial activism and support their proper role under the Constitution. Ryan T. Anderson of the Heritage Foundation has some important observations on the Supreme Court ruling, and how we should respond. Click here for more information.

Blogroll

Do you share our core values?

(1) Protecting and defending the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Rule of Law;
(2) Promoting limited, effective, and transparent local, state, and federal governments;
(3) Promoting personal and governmental fiscal responsibility;
(4) Promoting the free market system; and
(5) Assuring the integrity, transparency, and accountability of all appointed and elected government officials.