Just to let you people in on how things work 'downtown'. 'RECOVERY' - ASSASSINATiON / HIT's are nothing new for the NWO assassin teams. These are typical operations. They happen more often than not internally, but occasionally, they are needed to be done OUTSIDE the inner circle.

A special unit from the ABOVE are typically put on the assignment. The reason why I say this was a 'recovery' op is because UNTIL, and ONLY UNTIL ALL 'concerned' materials are without a shadow of a doubt 'recovered' does the operation get the 'go-ahead', using symbol below, for target termination.

The point is in the DOWN position meaning, all materials recovered, terminate 'WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE'.

Therefore the REAL footage of Obama has been recovered (as far as they know) and (most likely) IF ANY footage does come out CLAIMING to be that of Andrew Breitbart's it will most likely by a PROVABLE fake to discredit ANY real evidence Andrew Breitbart may have had.

Alex Jones made this a point. Breitbart's handlers are stalling and NOT releasing the damning video.

Will they be shocked to find that their hiding places were found BEFORE Breitbart's death?

Alex Jones made this a point. Breitbart's handlers are stalling and NOT releasing the damning video.

Will they be shocked to find that their hiding places were found BEFORE Breitbart's death?

At this point, the assassination of a non-mainstream journo is 1,000x more damaging to the Obama Deception Mythology than any fricking college video even if they have him f**king squirrels while shitting on an American flag.

I mean really, WTF? The New World Order just totally f-d themselves!

[Disclaimer: I am not saying that there exists hours of videos of the president f**king varmints nor videos of him defecating on 'ol glory, or doing both at the same time. I highly doubt that any squirrel f**king videos exist and i also doubt that our president engages in such activities to begin with. The satire was meant to expose the fact that sometimes a downtrodden group of incestous control freaks like the committee of 300 will cut off their nose to spite their face, or in this case, S.M.I.T.E. an American journo without realizing the just exposed themselves as the only true National Security threat to the United States of America.]

Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

At this point, the assassination of a non-mainstream journo is 1,000x more damaging to the Obama Deception Mythology than any fricking college video even if they have him f**king squirrels while shitting on an American flag.

I mean really, WTF? The New World Order just totally f-d themselves!

In some ways yes.

The problem however, is that you are assuming most people have two brain cells to rub together.

A video MAY have even woke up those individuals with that 'empty minded stare'.

You know. I wonder how many 'associates' of Obama have died of 'natural' causes who we don't even know about?

The pheonix program, get out of jail free cards. Above the law of he miliary regulars and any and all civilian auhoriy. Mr. Colby-CIA and Westmoreland, quite a pair, their Icon was Colonell Patton of the 11th. Armored cavalry.. Pyshotics. TDY, CIA & Mill combo, an excuse to stick hard core irregulars, on duty assigments or strictly hand picked CIA. Nothing has changed in fact it has imploded to a degree that is far beyond the average mans comprehension, a controlled cladestine "inside" organization that makes Murder Inc appear to be miniscule. Inside yes, golobal, YES.

The list from 2009 where Alex is #24 is from the Globe and glimpsed in this article... I don't see Andrew Breitbart anywhere however... Alex may have been mistaken or quoting from another list...

Oldyoti

"Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights." ~Thomas Jefferson,

At this point, the assassination of a non-mainstream journo is 1,000x more damaging to the Obama Deception Mythology than any fricking college video even if they have him f**king squirrels while shitting on an American flag.

I mean really, WTF? The New World Order just totally f-d themselves!

[Disclaimer: I am not saying that there exists hours of videos of the president f**king varmints nor videos of him defecating on 'ol glory, or doing both at the same time. I highly doubt that any squirrel f**king videos exist and i also doubt that our president engages in such activities to begin with. The satire was meant to expose the fact that sometimes a downtrodden group of incestous control freaks like the committee of 300 will cut off their nose to spite their face, or in this case, S.M.I.T.E. an American journo without realizing the just exposed themselves as the only true National Security threat to the United States of America.]

Exactly - Anybody who wants to can find the Bernadine Dorn /Bill Aires / "Communist"/CIA connection to Obama. We don't need a video.

Logged

Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

...or Corsi's "Obama-Nation"... But my gut tells me that what Breitbart found, or was more likely given, though related, is much more damning.

You're probably right. Heck, even if the video in question merely confirms what Tarpley and Corsi have been writing about for years, I think it's still safe to assume that -- if released unedited to the public -- it would damage Obama politically far more than any of the books that have been written about him.

Because for one thing, save for sports articles and celebrity gossip stories, most Americans simply don't read. And for another, there's a world of difference in the eyes of most people between merely "telling" them something in a book or essay and actually showing it to them on video.

Comment: As Pilger relates above, Obama's first employer was Business International Corporation, about which William Blum relates as follows: In his autobiography, "Dreams From My Fathers", Barack Obama writes of taking a job at some point after graduating from Columbia University in 1983. He describes his employer as "a consulting house to multinational corporations" in New York City, and his functions as a "research assistant" and "financial writer".

The odd part of Obama's story is that he doesn't mention the name of his employer. However, a New York Times story of 2007 identifies the company as Business International Corporation.10 Equally odd is that the Times did not remind its readers that the newspaper itself had disclosed in 1977 that Business International had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries between 1955 and 1960.

The British journal, Lobster Magazine - which, despite its incongruous name, is a venerable international publication on intelligence matters - has reported that Business International was active in the 1980s promoting the candidacy of Washington-favored candidates in Australia and Fiji. In 1987, the CIA overthrew the Fiji government after but one month in office because of its policy of maintaining the island as a nuclear-free zone, meaning that American nuclear-powered or nuclear-weapons-carrying ships could not make port calls. After the Fiji coup, the candidate supported by Business International, who was much more amenable to Washington's nuclear desires, was reinstated to power - R.S.K. Mara was Prime Minister or President of Fiji from 1970 to 2000, except for the one-month break in 1987.

In his book, not only doesn't Obama mention his employer's name; he fails to say when he worked there, or why he left the job. There may well be no significance to these omissions, but inasmuch as Business International has a long association with the world of intelligence, covert actions, and attempts to penetrate the radical left - including Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) - it's valid to wonder if the inscrutable Mr. Obama is concealing something about his own association with this world.

Of all the outside-the mainstream notions I've posited on this blog, the one that annoys the most people is my suggestion that the CIA recruited young Barack Obama during his days at Occidental College. I would further suggest that the Agency link runs in the family. I believe that, at an earlier time, the Agency (or some other branch of the intelligence community) may have recruited his mother, Ann Dunham.

~~~~~~~~~~~~For earlier posts in ths series -- may I call it a series? -- see

The eye-opener here concerns Obama's first job out of college. He was recruited by Business International Corporation, accused of functioning as a CIA front company. You don't have to take the word of John Pilger, the man in the video. Here's Wikipedia:

The company has been identified as cover organization for the Central Intelligence Agency, e.g. see Lobster Magazine, issue 14 in 1987. According to a lengthy article in the New York Times in 1977, the co-founder of the company told the newspaper that "Eldridge Haynes [the other founder] had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries between 1955 and 1960".

I see no reason to presume that the CIA/BIC relationship ended in 1960. Lobster is a quirky but reliable publication.

In his autobiography, "Dreams From My Fathers", Barack Obama writes of taking a job at some point after graduating from Columbia University in 1983. He describes his employer as "a consulting house to multinational corporations" in New York City, and his functions as a "research assistant" and "financial writer".

The odd part of Obama's story is that he doesn't mention the name of his employer. However, a New York Times story of 2007 identifies the company as Business International Corporation.

In his book, not only doesn't Obama mention his employer's name; he fails to say when he worked there, or why he left the job.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Obama's bios are as important for what they leave out as for what they reveal. I first became suspicious of his now-infamous trip to Pakistan (which he took in the summer between Occidental and Columbia) because he refused to mention this adventure in his books.

Think of it: We are talking about a man who compiled not one but two autobiographical works before the age of 46. We are talking about an ambitious politician intent on establishing his foreign policy cred. Yet he refused to mention a dangerous trip to Pakistan which he made at a time when travel to that country was discouraged by the State Department. That country was then the focus of the CIA's largest covert operation, the supplying of the Afghan mujahadeen. While there, this callow college kid met with one of the most powerful men in Pakistan -- a meeting arranged by an unnamed personage with the American Embassy. (Spook-watchers know what that means.)

If the trip was a pleasure jaunt, why did Obama keep it a secret? And how did he pay for the journey?

This site encapsulates a series of points which I had earlier made at greater length:Adding to the mix is the fact that Ann Dunham, Obama's mother, had visited at least 13 countries in her lifetime, and had worked for companies that required travel to Pakistan. Her employers appear to have included the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Ford Foundation, Women's World Bank, and the Asian Development Bank. Note that USAID and the Ford Foundation have (allegedly) been used as covers for CIA agents. . . . Like mother, like son. Ann worked for at least two organizations notorious for providing CIA cover. Barack went straight from college to an organization known to provide CIA cover. Coincidence?

Let's put it this way: How often do such things happen in your family?

Supposedly, Ann was a leftist. Yet she married Lolo Sotero, a key intermediary between the American oil companies and Indonesian strongman Suharto, installed by the CIA in an extremely bloody coup. (Obama admits the CIA connection in his book.) No genuine lefty would have had anything to do with Suharto or his cronies.

I do not claim to have conclusive evidence. Then again, one must ask: When we try to sort of occurrences in the clandestine world, what constitutes hard evidence? If you are emotionally invested in Obama, then no amount of proof will ever suffice -- except, perhaps, for a signed note by CIA director Panetta, saying "Yes, he worked for us."

A few posts down, I once again discussed my pet theory that young Barack Obama had been recruited by the CIA, a theory which annoys some and intrigues others. (See, for example, the strange blog here.) One piece of evidence favoring this idea concerns Obama's post-college gig at Business International Corporation, a New York firm never named or accurately described in his book, Dreams From My Father. A number of sources have pegged BIC as a company which has provided cover for CIA operatives.

This New York Times story on Obama's New York period offers further insights. The story refers to a blog called Analyze This, maintained by one Dan Armstrong. Unfortunately, that blog has slipped the surly bonds of the internets. When blogs die, the corpse usually lingers online for a good long time -- but Analyze This, alas, has vanished entirely. A pity, that: I've heard that it contained some interesting comments by other BIC alumni.

As does this NPR story.

Armstrong said Obama's book exaggerates just how respectable Business International was, with its description of suits and ties and meetings with German bond traders. There was no dress code, Armstrong said. And there was nothing corporate about it.

"It was a company full of low-paid, hard-working, fun-loving young people," Armstrong said. "It wasn't part of a high-powered consulting or finance world. It was a little sweatshop." The relevant section of Obama's book, and a counter-piece by Armstrong, can be found here. Obama portrayed the place as as a high-powered consulting house. Armstrong (who worked down the hall) replied:

First, it wasn’t a consulting house; it was a small company that published newsletters on international business. Like most newsletter publishers, it was a bit of a sweatshop. I’m sure we all wished that we were high-priced consultants to multinational corporations. But we also enjoyed coming in at ten, wearing jeans to work, flirting with our co-workers, partying when we stayed late, and bonding over the low salaries and heavy workload.

Barack worked on one of the company’s reference publications. Each month customers got a new set of pages on business conditions in a particular country, punched to fit into a three-ring binder. Barack’s job was to get copy from the country correspondents and edit it so that it fit into a standard outline. There was probably some research involved as well, since correspondents usually don’t send exactly what you ask for, and you can’t always decipher their copy. But essentially the job was copyediting.

I must confess: That does sound like a humdrum gig. Still, I wonder what life was like for the "country correspondents." I can easily see a CIA agent using that job title as cover.

Here's how Armstrong describes Obama's somewhat misleading account of his days at BIC: All of Barack’s embellishment serves a larger narrative purpose: to retell the story of the Christ’s temptation. The young, idealistic, would-be community organizer gets a nice suit, joins a consulting house, starts hanging out with investment bankers, and barely escapes moving into the big mansion with the white folks. Luckily, an angel calls, awakens his conscience, and helps him choose instead to fight for the people.Obama left the job without having any other source of income lined up, and his reason for leaving -- guilt over not being true to himself -- strikes me as unconvincing.

If my pet theory has merit, then we may posit that Obama, having done a service for the Agency in Pakistan, was granted a temporary gig at a firm with which the Agency had good relations. In other words, someone was looking out for him.

And just who was the someone? Possibly Zbigniew Brzezinski: Obama was one of only seven students to study sovietology under Brzezinski at Columbia, or so it says here.

The previous post also noted that Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, traveled the world while working for the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Ford Foundation, Women's World Bank, and the Asian Development Bank. USAID is notorious for working with the CIA, as is the Ford Foundation. (For further background, see "The Ford Foundation and the CIA.") But what of the other two groups?

The Asian Development Bank, headquartered in the Philippines, is a financial institution ostensibly devoted to raising Asia's poor out of poverty. A laudable goal. Frankly, though, after reading this Wikipedia entry (which reads like ad copy), I'm still not sure how this organization does what it says it does.

Even the most laudable and respectable organization may still provide cover for CIA-linked individuals, and the Asian Development Bank may have done just that. So, at least, claims the venerable German "spook-watching" publication Geheim!. They published an Agee-like list of CIA personnel serving under various guises throughout the world, a list compiled, it seems, from previous issues of the magazine.

One alleged Agency-linked personage is "Cinnamon N. Dornsife" of the "Asian Development Bank - Manila." Her name is actually N. Cinnamon Dornsife, and she was the "U.S. Ambassdor" to the bank, or so it says here. (I didn't know that countries sent ambassadors to banks. One learns something new every day.) Her resume is here. She was graduated from SAIS, a CIA-linked institution, and then went on to work for six years in Indonesia.

I wonder if she knew Ann?

Women's World Banking provides microcredit financing to woman-owned businesses internationally -- a very commendable goal, to be sure. I've found nothing linking this group to spookery.

So what does it all mean? Perhaps nothing -- after all, many people have worked for BIC, USAID, the Ford Foundation and Asian Development Bank without having any connection to the intelligence community. There's a difference between providing cover for CIA personnel and functioning as a CIA front.

Still, both Barry and his mom have interesting employment histories. Once again, I have to ask: How often does this sort of thing happen in your family?

An added note to the added note: A rather full account of Ann's foreign adventures can be found in a Google machine translation of a piece originally published in an Indonesian blog. The title of the post googles into English as "During the Rose of Heaven All her life Doing Good So Much Amazing That Called Stanley Ann Dunham." I get the impression that the author may have a bias. At any rate, it turns out that her work for the Asian Development bank took her to Pakistan in 1986-87.

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

WHO ARE THE TERRORISTS?WHO ARE IN THE PROCESS OF A COUP D'ETAT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT?WHO IS FOLLOWING HITLER'S TECHNIQUES OF TERRORISM?WHO ARE THE FANATICS WHO HAVE STATED THEY WANT TO KILL 25 MILLION AMERICANS?WHO ARE THE SLEEPER CELLS AND HOW ARE THEY TRIGGERED?WHO CREATES TERRORISTS BY INDOCTRINATING PEOPLE INTO FAUX RELIGIOUS CAUSES INCLUDING GAIA?WHO CREATES TERRORISTS BY INDOCTRINATING PEOPLE INTO FAUX POLITICAL CAUSES INCLUDING ANTI-CAPITALISM?WHO FUNDS THE TERRORISTS?FOLLOW THE MONEY AND THE EVIDENCE...Just so we are all clear who the enemy is and how they operate..."Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting." -Sun Tzu

"To keep people everywhere from deciding their own destinies by means of one created crisis after another and then “managing” such crises. This will confuse and demoralize the population to the extent where faced with too many choices, apathy on a massive scale will result. In the case of the United States, an agency for crisis management is already in place. It is called the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), whose existence I first disclosed in 1980. There will be more on FEMA as we proceed." -John Coleman Committee of 300 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_committee300_02.htm

Levin was the author of a work entitled “Time Perspective and Morale” which is a Club of Rome publication concerning how to break down the morale of nations and individual leaders.

Here is an extract of the document:

“One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a strategy of terror consists in exactly this tactic: keep the person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may expect. In addition, if frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promise of good treatment together with the spreading of contradictory news make the structure of the situation unclear, then the individual may cease to know whether a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal.

Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks are paralyzed by the severe inner conflict in regard to what to do.”

This Club of Rome blueprint applies to COUNTRIES as well as to individuals, particularly the government leaders of those countries. We in the U.S. need not think that “Oh well, this is America, and those kinds of things just do not happen here.” Let me assure you that they ARE happening in the U.S., and perhaps more so than in any other country.

The Levin-Club of Rome plan is designed to demoralize us all so that in the end we feel we should follow whatever it is that is planned for us. We WILL follow Club of Rome orders like sheep. Any seemingly strong leader who SUDDENLY APPEARS to “rescue” the nation must be regarded with the utmost suspicion. Remember that Khomeini was groomed for years by British intelligence, especially during his time in Paris, before he suddenly appeared as the savior of Iran. Boris Yeltsin is from the same M16-SIS stable.

The Club of Rome feels confident that it has carried out it Committee of 300 mandate to “soften up” the United States. After 45 years of waging war on the people of this nation, who will doubt that it has indeed accomplished its task? Look around and see how we have been demoralized.

[...]

With the U.S. spiritually, morally bankrupted, with our industrial base destroyed throwing 30 million people out of work with our big cities ghastly cesspools of every imaginable crime with a murder rate almost three times higher than any other country, with 4 million homeless, with corruption in government reaching endemic proportions, who will gainsay that the United States is ready to collapse from within, into the waiting arms of the New Dark Age One World Government?

[...]

We as a nation are ready to accept the demise of the United States of America and the American way of life, once the envy of the entire world.

Do not think this has happened on its own— the old “times are changing” syndrome. Time does not change anything, PEOPLE do.

Banksters have bet on Barry Soetoro, Bill Ayers, John Holdren, John Holdren, Rahm Emanuel, Elena Kagan, etc. to further the continued destruction of the middle class in America. This is the softening up period. Previously, the banksters got 8 good years of destroying America from George W. Bush.

If anyone thinks that Bill Ayers, John Holdren, Cass Sunstein, Rahm Emanuel, Elena Kagan, and other globalist revolutionary idealists give a flying crap about the American people, they are insane. Their entire philosophy is based on their "higher knowledge" of society and that they need to force a revolution to get their way. They also believe they need to do it in secrecy using deception, false flag terrorist acts, lying to the public, and any other machievellian protocol available.

The banksters still control the strings and are using these idealogues to further the NWO goal which is to remove borders, remove sovereignty, remove useless eaters, and re-educate the zombies that make it through their violent and genocidal depopulation plans. They are using the Soetoro deception to destroy all American industries. They took out the auto industry, the banking industry, the healthcare industry, and are now going after the energy industry.

IMO, this group of psychos most probably were part of various Kissinger/Rockefeller study groups [MK Ultra sub-programs] where the purpose is to manipulate the minds of America's youth into anti-American revolutionary agendas. It is not like there is no evidence of this, Ted Kazcinski was at Harvard and because of his intellect and because of how much he loved America, the family, etc. he was put into one of these programs. He was trained to be a sophisticated revolutionary. He was being trained to hate America, hate the Family, hate Capitalism, hate Monotheism. He was trained to be a violent terrorist against capitalism, against American ideals. This is on record, proven, documented, incontrovertible.

[Side note: The ivy league schools are used for this recruiting, they are completely owned by Bilderberg/Committee of 300 and regularly set seeds for various controlled movements to take shape. That is why you always see the same people from the same schools hand picked to be the highest level puppets in this country. Yale was founded to protect the East India Trading Company's control over the international drug and slavery trade. So the NWO uses a different controlled agenda every 4-12 years using conditioned puppets.]

[Disclaimer: This site detests any provocation of violence in any way whatsoever. The insane actions taught to Kaczynski in the unconsented MK Ultra studies forced upon him without his knowledge at Harvard University are deplorable. Here is the Forum's stand on activism as explained in the subheading of the activism room: This forum is to promote non-violent non-cooperation as MLK, Jr. and Gandhi did. Do not ever, even as innuendo, promote violence on this forum. Report others who do. Anyone promoting violence will be banned and posts removed (at the least). The promoting of violence is a CoIntelPro tactic to stop lawful discourse against corrupt government tyranny. Research the Church Commission report and you will find that 25% of the KKK during the 1960's were FBI and FBI assets. They were the ones in the cars and engaged in the conversations promoting the horrendous violence that occured throught this great land. They also were promoting violence within the constitutional black nationalist movements in order to shut that down (see CoIntelPro: War on Black America). Do not let the new CoIntelPro do the same thing with the truth movement. More here: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=60394.0 Additionally, this site condemns the insane actions by elite chess players like Kissinger and others who exterminate millions via false flag terrorism and mockingbird psyops.]

Here are some links into the minds of these violent revolutionary terrorist lunatics:

When Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn led the domestic terrorist group Weather Underground in 1969, a chance meeting led Army veteran Larry Grathwohl into joining the group. Grathwohl served as a courier, running messages between the group’s leadership (called the “Weather Bureau”) and individual cells that were to carry out attacks. Grathwohl was also an informant for the FBI. In an interview from the 1982 documentary No Place To Hide that recently surfaced, Grathwohl discussed what the Weathermen intended to do after overthrowing the U.S. government, including what they would do with those Americans who refused to embrace communism [1]. I asked, “Well what is going to happen to those people we can’t reeducate, that are diehard capitalists?” And the reply was that they’d have to be eliminated. And when I pursued this further, they estimated they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers. And when I say “eliminate,” I mean “kill.” Twenty-five million people. I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees, from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people. And they were dead serious.

These are the front men. Some are just greedy psychos who got caught up in a slavery system where the more they sell out their souls, the more material trinkets they get. Some are like what Ted Kaczinski was supposed to be:

Harvard Reveals Ted Kaczynski is an MK-Ultra Mind Control Victim. In June of 2000, Harvard University Invoices also linked Kaczynski to the CIA [LA Times] as a subject in the CIA Mind Control Program MK-Ultra. The brilliant awkward 16 year old Kaczynski met with Henry A Murray (of Mk-Ultra LSD Scandal fame) in 1959 on his third day at Harvard and every week thereafter. [Atlantic Monthly][Net] Interestingly, Ted Kaczynski's Mk-Ultra Codename was "Lawful"...mind control slang for "Eureka here's our guy" ! The public has never heard Ted Kaczynski's voice to date, nor seen him speak. The murder of MK-Ultra scientist Frank Olson was later covered up by Donald Rumsfeld and Cheney [Rumsfeld].http://www.unabombers.com/

The controllers of Harvard/Yale and all the other schools who groom supposed "leaders of America" conduct behavioral modification sessions to blow apart the pro-American mentality of our most gifted youths in order to fill them with New World Order concepts. This type of behavior modification is also done in the military as we have seen with Tim McVeigh who felt he was doing something for the greater good above the sovereign rights of "We the People".

And who controls these top social systems? Behind the scenes are the same old players...

A new criterion has been added, the conservation of the environment so that in the long run life, including human life, can continue. This new consideration must be taken into account at all levels and in all departments of government and in the boardrooms of every industrial enterprise. It is no longer sufficient simply to quantify the elements of existence as in old-fashioned material economics; conservation means taking notice of the quality of existence as well...

The problem is of course to give some value to that quality and perhaps the only way to do this is to try and work out the cost in terms of loss of amenities, loss of holiday and recreation facilities, loss of property values, loss of contact with nature, loss of health standards and loss of food resources, if proper conservation methods are not used.

Looked at in that light it may well turn out that money spent on proper pollution control, urban and rural planning and the control of exploitation of wild stocks of plants or animals on land and in the sea, is the less expensive alternative in the long run...The conservation of nature, the proper care for the human environment and a general concern for the long-term future of the whole of our planet are absolutely vital if future generations are to have a chance to enjoy their existence on this earth.

-The Australian Conservation Foundation, Canberra (April 1970)

It is clear in the past 40 years that over 99.9% of the industrialized world has been put into this control system that Prince Philip said was necessary. Less wages, less amenities, loss of holiday, loss of property value, lossed contact with UN controlled nature preserves, loss of health standards, loss of control of food resources. What sacrifices have Prince Philip and his Bilderberg buddies made for the past 40 years?

THEY NEED PERSISTING SOCIAL CRISIS TO JUSTIFY THE USE OF CIVILIAN TRAUMA AND SERVITUDE WEAPONS AS BRAGGED ABOUT BY ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI IN 1970!!

AJ's show with with Dr. Blaylock was right on the money:

Today Alex welcomes back Dr. Russell Blaylock, board certified neurosurgeon, author and lecturer, to discuss lithium and fluoride being added to local water supplies.

In the 2008 movie "The Happening" mankind is assaulted by biochemical weapons that destroys their natural survival instincts leading victims to fearlessly commit suicide by walking into a lion's den or throwing themselves under a lawn mower.

In the final frames of this movie we see a school bus and on that bus a large number is visible:

2010

Now 2010 has arrived and we read bizzare stories of shrimp drugged on prozac committing suicide as they fearlessly throw themselves into danger.

Vaccines are being used to deliver live virus bioweapons that re-engineer our brains by destroying our natural survival instincts. This at the same time a sudden chorus of academics are pushing sedating the masses by adding toxic lithium to the water supply. As Alex explains, this combined biochemcal assault will render the masses unable to resist the globalists as they carry out the next phases of their incremental plan of global enslavement and extermination.

Those seeking the destruction of mankind operate under a code requiring them to give advance notice. Could the prominent but fleeting date of "2010" in the movie "The Happening" have been a warning that this is the year we would all be thrown under the biochemical bus?

What is important to note is Jerry Mazza's evaluation and comparison of the two moments in historical context:

He actually wrote a chapter called “How to Wreck the Environment” in his book, Unless Peace Comes. Of course, this came at the height of the Vietnam brutality. Given the aura of violence similar to today’s, Gordon described in his chapter, among other things, “polar ice cap melting or destabilization, ozone depletion techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean wave control and brain wave manipulation using the planet’s energy fields.”

Also important to note is Brzezinski's invisible hand in all of these narratives pervasive among the elite controllers of society:

As of 1970, Brzezinski predicted HAARP could be used for “a more controlled and directed society” linked to technology. This society would be dominated by an elite group which impresses voters by allegedly superior scientific know-how.” Furthermore, Dr. Strangelove states, “Unhindered by the restrains of traditional liberal values, this elite [the New World Order of today] would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it exploits.”

And thus spake Brzezinski, who also predicted that it would take an inciting incident like Pearl Harbor (i.e., 9/11) to engage the normally peaceful American population to go to war on a march for world hegemony (i.e., The War on Terror). And he was spot on.

Zbig is not afraid, in fact, is lauded for thinking down avenues that would make most of us shiver with disgust. Regrettably, his forecasts tend to prove accurate, because they inspire the worst people to do the worst things. And so, these “tools for the elite” and their temptation to use them increases incredibly. The policies to use them are in place. As to the “stepping stones” that could be used to reach this highly controlled techno-society, Brezinski expected them to be “persisting social crisis” and the use of mass media to gain the public’s confidence. Again, he’s spot on.

As to the “stepping stones” that could be used to reach this highly controlled techno-society, Brezinski expected them to be “persisting social crisis” and the use of mass media to gain the public’s confidence. Again, he’s spot on.

So, I was reading this article (I think it has already been linked to by other people on here - since Alan Watt linked to it a couple of days ago - but as far as I know, this is the original article and contains some more stuff that the link Alan Watt put up did not have ) - and it made mention of this consortium called Global Business Network. The English Ideology and WIRED MagazinePart Three Of Three

Techno-Utopianism: The Final Imperial Solutionby Mark Stahlman November 22nd, 1996

No less chilling is the scenarios planning exercise that WIRED's wizards-behind-the-curtain perform on their multi-national clients. From General Motors to AT&T, the Global Business Network (GBN) charges hefty sums to show the yellow-brick-road towards "ByteCity" to strategic planners and top corporate brass. In one recent and rare public discussion of the results, GM's top planning team defined the three "alternative futures" which emerged after years of GBN counseling. The first is just like our world and, so by definition, is not very interesting. The second is an eco-fascist regime in which car designs are completely "Green" and the companies can only follow orders. The third is the fun one, however. This is the world in which armed gangs roam the streets and surface travel is a series of car chases. This scenario has already been anticipated with a Cadillac that includes armored protection and a "panic" button installed in the middle of the dashboard. The car has a satellite tracking system built in and it can call the local authorities (presumably your multi-national's private swat-team) and get help when you get trapped by the natives.

So naturally, I looked into Global Business Network. This consortium is kind of like Wells 'The Samurai' corporate overlord board - every bigwig company you can imagine that is into some type of big industry is among its members.

I don't have time to list all of the companies, so let's just list for the sake of interest some of the key companies that consider themselves to be members - these companies also provide for the organization's funding:

Sun Microsystems (My note: See, I don't want to hear anymore crap from some techies that Sun Microsystems was 'once' good prior to being taken over by the evil 'Oracle' - to hell with that - they were ALWAYS part of the hive mind - stop sucking up to controlled opposition is my message to these people - forget about the SPARC processors and all that shit and realize these guys didn't give a rip about you, the individual, or any semblance of human dignity - same as all the other corporate technocrats)

Xerox

The list is far longer than this, but you get the drill - any corporation worth its salt is a member and/or provides funding for it.

This ties back into Stewart Brand - the guy behind the Whole Earth Catalog, the founding of Wired Magazine, and the main progenitor of this entire techno-utopia 'scientific dictatorship' that the Unabomber railed against. Coincidentally, he was also a co-founder of Global Business Network.

Brand is a co-founder of the Global Business Network (GBN) (1988) [4]; the The Long Now Foundation (1995) [5], "whose core project is the construction of a 10,000 year clock called The Clock of the Long Now"; the ALL Species Foundation (2001) [6], "to find and document every life form on Earth" [7]; and the Long Bets Foundation (2001), "an arena for competitive, accountable predictions" and "to foster better long-term thinking." [8][9]

Anyway, here comes the big one - this is a report produced by the Rockefeller Foundation in cooperation with Global Business Network in May 2010 - and it shows four possible future scenarios that the world might be headed into. Let's discuss this, shall we.

Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International DevelopmentThis report was produced by

The Rockefeller Foundationand Global Business Network.May 2010

Let's see what Peter Schwartz, President of Global Business Network, has to say about these 'scenarios' firsthand:

Quote

Scenario planning is a powerful tool precisely because the future is unpredictable and shaped by many interacting variables. Scenarios enable us to think creatively and rigorously about the different ways these forces may interact, while forcing us to challenge our own assumptions about what we believe or hope the future will be. Scenarios embrace and weave together multiple perspectives and provide an ongoing framework for spotting and making sense of important changes as they emerge. Perhaps most importantly, scenarios give us a new, shared language that deepens our conversations about the future and how we can help to shape it.

The Rockefeller Foundation has already used this project as an opportunity to clarify and advance the relationship between technology and development. Through interviews and the scenario workshops, they have engaged a diverse set of people - from different geographies, disciplines, and sectors - to identify the key forces driving change, to explore the most critical uncertainties, and to develop challenging yet plausible scenarios and implications.

On Morning Joe, Carter's former national security adviser said there "is a sense of pervasive malaise" in America. What's worse, suggested Zbig, Pres. Obama hasn't been able to figure out how to deal with the malaise. Ruh-roh!

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: I think we're now going through a phase in which there is a sense of pervasive malaise, which affects different groups in society in different ways.

So people are dissatisfied; they're slightly worried; they don't see a good certain future for themselves or for the country, but in their own narrow sphere.

There's no grand mobilizing idea. And I have a sense that Obama, who started so well, and who really captivated people—he captivated me!—has not been able yet to generate some sort of organizing idea for an age which combines a malaise that's pervasive and percolating, and complexity.. . .

PAT BUCHANAN: We need a new paradigm!

BREZINSKI: And the President hasn't articulated it.

BUCHANAN: No he hasn't.

BREZINSKI: There goes any further invitation to the White House!

Brzezinski clearly understood the personal implications of his downer of a diagnosis: "there goes any further invitation to the White House!" The panel all enjoyed a good chuckle, but could anything be much worse for PBO than to be seen as the reincarnation of Jimmy Carter?

Historical Note: Here's more on the Malaise Speech itself. Interestingly, although Carter adviser Pat Caddell used "malaise" in his notes for the speech, Carter himself never actually employed the word, speaking instead of a "crisis of the spirit in our country."

No Goneril, She: Good daughter that she is, Mika tried to put the best face on father's words. As Zbig lamented the end of his White House invitations, Mika twice pointed out that he had said "yet." In other words, it's not that pops had painted the president an irredeemable failure. It's just that PBO hasn't come up with a solution to the malaise "yet."

Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

NDAA is just an extension of the Libyan model. The only reason they did NDAA is because they are planning a Libya style takedown of America and they need to exterminate anyone exposing that the US 'rebels' (OWS) are controlled (whether they know it or not) by CIA operatives who are connected to the Weather UndergroundIndie Journalists in Libya Targeted for Killing by NATO to control false narrativeshttp://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=94&contentid=8880by DEBORAH DUPRE

(August 23, 2011) The Examiner learned in communications from human rights defenders and independent journalists throughout Monday that they were shaken with news of 1300 Libyans killed and 5000 wounded Saturday, plus, the U.S. allegedly ordered Targeted Killings of Voltaire Network reporters, Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya and Thierry Meyssan, non-mainstream reporters in Libya covering the NATO war, while other independent reporters there are being fired upon and one, Mohammed Nabbous was killed Saturday according to ABC News.

In an interview with journalist Don DeBar on KPFA radio, he reported most mainstream "news" about Libya has been untrue, as alternative news sites heavily report but are increasingly persecuted according to their recent reports.

The reporter who may have known too much, slain and what the U.S. is hiding

"The conflict in Libya has claimed the life of another journalist. A sniper shot Mohammed Nabbous, 28-year old resident of Benghazi and founder of its first independent TV news channel Libya Alhurra, on Saturday night," reported ABC's Mark Colvin on Monday.And look how DoD uses 'anonymous' to selectively 'leak' information which justifies targeted assassinations (even by Nazi drones).

I wrote last week about the absurdity of the Obama administration's position on the supposedly-secret Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) drone strikes that Obama defended publicly at a town hall meeting. Despite Obama's claims that the drone strikes are "very precise, precision strikes against al-Qaeda and their affiliates," the Washington Post reports today on a recent strike:

Pakistan kicked the U.S. out of a base used by American drones last year in retaliation for American airstrikes that accidentally killed 24 Pakistani troops at two Afghan border posts on Nov. 26.

We also know that drones have killed at least three Americans – Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, his companion Samir Khan, and al-Awlaki's 16 year-old son.

If the most recent strike had killed only suspected terrorists, certainly the Obama administration would be publicizing it the way it did when Obama touted the al-Awlaki assassination as a "tribute to our intelligence community."

Even though, officially,

The U.S. does not publicly discuss details of the covert CIA-run drone program in Pakistan,

President Obama, anonymous Obama administration officials, and anonymous Pakistani officials, have all told the public about the drone program.

Why then does the Justice Department persist that it can "neither confirm nor deny" the existence of the program? The fake secrecy serves a purpose: forcing the public to get information about Obama's expanding drone program from anonymous leaks of pro-drone talking points from the Obama administration, thus obscuring an informed public debate on whether the U.S. should be in the business of sending automated drones overseas to target and kill people or, worse, its own citizens.

Today's reports follow reports Sunday that not only are civilians killed in drone strikes, but that the U.S.

. . . repeatedly targeted rescuers who responded to the scene of a strike, as well as mourners at subsequent funerals. The report, by the London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism, found that at least 50 civilians had been killed in follow-up strikes after they rushed to help those hit by a drone-fired missile. The bureau counted more than 20 other civilians killed in strikes on funerals.

Killing rescuers sounds awfully similar to the attacks shown in the deeply disturbing "Collateral Murder" video of WikiLeaks fame in which a U.S. military helicopter gunned down journalists, and then children who were riding in a van aiding civilians injured in the attack.

Moreover, the London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism found:

that 282 to 535 civilians had been “credibly reported” killed in those attacks, including more than 60 children.

This is a damning statistic considering Obama was just last week publicly bragging about the miniscule number of civilian deaths. To deal with the blatant inconsistency, it is yet again ANONYMOUS ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS to the public-relations rescue:

American officials said that the number was much too high, though they acknowledged that at least several dozen civilians had been killed inadvertently in strikes aimed at militant suspects. . . . A senior American counterterrorism official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, questioned the report’s findings, saying “targeting decisions are the product of intensive intelligence collection and observation.”

Don't dare to dig any deeper, though. And, don't ask the administration about the Justice Department memo rationalizing the targeting and assassination of an American citizen, because, in that case – when the information would open the administration up to well-deserved criticism - the Justice Department can "neither confirm nor deny the existence or nonexistence" of the records. All the public has to go on is what "anonymous administration officials" feed to the press.

Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Eric Holder is expected to outline the legal framework for the use of lethal force in targeted killings of Americans overseas in a major speech at Northwestern University law school, an Obama administration official said Sunday night.

Holder's speech Monday comes five months after the killing of U.S.-born al-Qaida cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen in a drone attack.

The official said the attorney general plans to say that lethal force is legal under a Sept. 18, 2001, joint congressional resolution. [NOTE: This is 100% horseshit and everybody knows it!]The Authorization for Use of Military Force enacted a week after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks authorizes the use of all necessary force in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States.

The official said Holder also will address how the Obama administration reformed military commissions and how both the Obama and the George W. Bush administrations have successfully used civilian courts to convict and sentence terrorists. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the contents of the speech haven't been released.

In recent months, the Obama administration has engaged in an internal debate about how much to reveal about the legal justification for the al-Awlaki killing.

At least three recently filed lawsuits have sought to force the Obama administration to publicly release its legal justification for the drone strike that killed al-Awlaki. The justification is contained in a secret Justice Department memo.

The administration has provided some details about what al-Awlaki was doing that made him so dangerous to the United States. In that vein, the Justice Department disclosed that a Nigerian man who tried to blow up an international flight on Christmas 2009 told FBI agents that his mission was approved after a three-day visit with al-Awlaki.

The man, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was sentenced last month to life in prison after admitting he attempted to blow up the plane with a bomb in his underwear as the plane approached Detroit.

Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

...Quote from: Freebird100 on March 14, 2010, 06:55:16 PMhttp://www.renewamerica.com/columns/spingola/100314March 14, 2010 By Deanna Spingola The State Department passport records were scrubbed to erase any mention of Obama's CIA activities and his personal information. ...The State Department employee, Lt. Quarle Harris, Jr. who had access and apparently scrubbed the records, was killed. [9] Harris decided to cooperate with the FBI who was investigating the break-in. His body was discovered in his parked car; he had been shot in the head, execution style.

[10] The Indonesian passport, issued in the name of Barry Soetoro, was used to travel to Pakistan to assist the Afghan Mujahideen during the U.S. buildup.

A key witness in a federal probe into passport information stolen from the State Department was fatally shot in front of a District church, the Metropolitan Police Department said yesterday.

Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., 24, who had been cooperating with a federal investigators, was found late Thursday night slumped dead inside a car, in front of the Judah House Praise Baptist Church in Northeast, said Cmdr. Michael Anzallo, head of the department’s Criminal Investigations Division.

Cmdr. Anzallo said a police officer was patrolling the neighborhood when gunshots were heard, then Lt. Harris was found dead inside the vehicle, which investigators would describe only as a blue car.

Emergency medics pronounced him dead at the scene.

City police said they do not know whether his death was a direct result of his cooperation with federal investigators.

“We don’t have any information right now that connects his murder to that case,” Cmdr. Anzallo said.

A State Department spokeswoman yesterday declined to comment, saying the investigation into the passport fraud is ongoing. ...One agency employee, who was not identified in documents filed in U.S. District Court, was implicated in a credit-card fraud scheme after Lt. Harris told federal authorities he obtained “passport information from a co-conspirator who works for the U.S. Department of State.”

Logged

Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

CIA Manual on Clandestine Assassinations published in 1953 (the same year that CIA Scientist Frank Olson was murdered by Georgetown Set and Averell Harriman owned treasonous cowards Richard Bissell and Sidney Gottlieb on orders by MI6/Queen Bitch)...

CIA Publishes Its Own "Assassin's Manual" Proof That CIA Controllers (Bilderberg) Actively Order The Clandestine Killings Of American Citizens Who Oppose Anti-Constitutional PoliciesThe CIA Manual Published In 1953 And Declassified in 1998 Outlines Methods To Make Sure The Public Narrative Covers-Up The CIA-MurderBy Making It Appear As "A Death By Natural Causes"

The CIA 'Killer's Manual' was kept out of the public eye for years, but now we know it teaches the 'fine art' of assassination as if it was a mandatory college course.

If there are any lingering doubts about whether the U.S. government acts like a bunch of mafia hit men, the following documents, classified for years, should clear things up.

And as the “CIA’s Killer’s Instruction Manual” points out remember that possibly the only thing separating the mafia from the U.S. government is that the thugs in the underworld are much, much smarter.

Never in a month of Sundays would mafia thugs ever think of leaving behind a paper trail, like the following CIA documents indicate, on how exactly to pull off the perfect assassination attempt.

But that’s exactly what the U.S. government did when the CIA distributed a training manual for would-be killers called “A Study of Assassination,” distributed to agents and operatives taking part in the agency’s 1953 covert coup in Guatemala, which ousted the country’s democratically elected President.

The killer’s training manual. hidden and classified until 1997, until the National Security Archive, a Washington D.C. public-interest group, obtained a copy among roughly 1,400 pages found by the group concerning the Guatemala coup, in light of CIA statements that it has destroyed all other secret files about the coup.

Since the release of the documents, however, their contents have remained virtually hidden from the public eye, the messy details of how to pull off the perfect assassination never making it into the mainstream press and only viewed by a select few elsewhere.

Presented by the CIA almost like a college course for future killers, the Department of Defense and CIA spokesmen this week denied knowing anything about the manual, adding they were not aware of any such teaching tool being distributed to agents or operatives.

As the manual verifies purely by its publication, the U.S. government is involved up to its neck in the killing business, the involvement going back to the early 1950’s and most likely much farther back.

And it’s safe to say nothing has changed today, since reports by John Perkins in his latest book, “The Economic Hit Man” and other reports surfacing, seem to indicate the killing business is booming for the government.

Take, for example, the recent story told by former Army wife Kay Griggs of Virginia, who recounts how her husband for more than 10 years told her about his involvement with training and participating in government hit squads, knowledge of which leads to the doorstep of some of the most powerful leaders in our country, including the Oval Office.

Also, consider the recent stories coming out of Venezuela where democratically elected President Hugo Chavez is running for his life from the CIA after he publicly on numerous occasions has announced to the world that the Bush administration wants him dead for not cooperating with policies that would leave his country bankrupt and his people starving.

And in a sick, twisted manner, working on a theory that the end justifies the means, the CIA published it s killer’s manual, breaking down the art of committing the perfect assassination into eight major categories, including definition, employment, justification, classification, the assassin, planning, techniques and examples.

Here are the portions of the manual, the words taken directly from the CIA writers illustrating just how sick, twisted and distorted they really are:

DEFINITION

According to the CIA, assassination is a term thought to be derived from "Hashish", a drug similar to marijuana, said to have been used by Hassan al-Sabbah to induce motivation in his followers, who were assigned to carry out political and other murders, usually at the cost of their lives.

It is here used to describe the planned killing of a person who is not under the legal jurisdiction of the killer, who is not physically in the hands of the killer, who has been selected by a resistance organization for death, and whose death provides positive advantages to that organization.

EMPLOYMENT

Assassination is an extreme measure not normally used in clandestine operations. It should be assumed that it will never be ordered or authorized by any U.S. Headquarters, though the latter may in rare instances agree to its execution by members of an associated foreign service.

This reticence is partly due to the necessity for committing communications to paper. No assassination instructions should ever be written or recorded. Consequently, the decision to employ this technique must nearly always be reached in the field, at the area where the act will take place. Decision and instructions should be confined to an absolute minimum of persons. Ideally, only one person will be involved. No report may be made, but usually the act will be properly covered by normal news services, whose output is available to all concerned.

JUSTIFICATION

Murder is not morally justifiable. Self-defense may be argued if the victim has knowledge which may destroy the resistance organization if divulged. Assassination of persons responsible for atrocities or reprisals may be regarded as just punishment. Killing a political leader whose burgeoning career is a clear and present danger to the cause of freedom may be held necessary.

But assassination can seldom be employed with a clear conscience. Persons who are morally squeamish should not attempt it.

CLASSIFICATIONS

The techniques employed will vary according to whether the subject is unaware of his danger, aware but unguarded, or guarded. They will also be affected by whether or not the assassin is to be killed with the subject hereafter, assassinations in which the subject is unaware will be termed "simple"; those where the subject is aware but unguarded will be termed "chase"; those where the victim is guarded will be termed "guarded."

If the assassin is to die with the subject, the act will be called "lost." If the assassin is to escape, the adjective will be "safe." It should be noted that no compromises should exist here. The assassin must not fall alive into enemy hands.

A further type division is caused by the need to conceal the fact that the subject was actually the victim of assassination, rather than an accident or natural causes. If such concealment is desirable the operation will be called "secret"; if concealment is immaterial, the act will be called "open"; while if the assassination requires publicity to be effective it will be termed "terroristic."

Following these definitions, the assassination of Julius Caesar was safe, simple, and terroristic, while that of Huey Long was lost, guarded and open. Obviously, successful secret assassinations are not recorded as assassination at all. [Illeg] of Thailand and Augustus Caesar may have been the victims of safe, guarded and secret assassination.

THE ASSASSIN

In safe assassinations, the assassin needs the usual qualities of a clandestine agent. He should be determined, courageous, intelligent, resourceful, and physically active. If special equipment is to be used, such as firearms or drugs, it is clear that he must have outstanding skill with such equipment.

Except in terroristic assassinations, it is desirable that the assassin be transient in the area. He should have an absolute minimum of contact with the rest of the organization and his instructions should be given orally by one person only. His safe evacuation after the act is absolutely essential, but here again contact should be as limited as possible. It is preferable that the person issuing instructions also conduct any withdrawal or covering action which may be necessary.

In lost assassination, the assassin must be a fanatic of some sort. Politics, religion, and revenge are about the only feasible motives. Since a fanatic is unstable psychologically, he must be handled with extreme care. He must not know the identities of the other members of the organization, for although it is intended that he die in the act, something may go wrong. While the Assassin of Trotsky has never revealed any significant information, it was unsound to depend on this when the act was planned.

PLANNING

When the decision to assassinate has been reached, the tactics of the operation must be planned, based upon an estimate of the situation similar to that used in military operations. The preliminary estimate will reveal gaps in information and possibly indicate a need for special equipment which must be procured or constructed. When all necessary data has been collected, an effective tactical plan can be prepared. All planning must be mental; no papers should ever contain evidence of the operation.

In resistance situations, assassination may be used as a counter-reprisal. Since this requires advertising to be effective, the resistance organization must be in a position to warn high officials publicly that their lives will be the price of reprisal action against innocent people. Such a threat is of no value unless it can be carried out, so it may be necessary to plan the assassination of various responsible officers of the oppressive regime and hold such plans in readiness to be used only i f provoked by excessive brutality. Such plans must be modified frequently to meet changes in the tactical situation.

TECHNIQUES

The essential point of assassination is the death of the subject. A human being may be killed in many ways but sureness is often overlooked by those who may be emotionally unstrung by the seriousness of this act they intend to commit. The specific technique employed will depend upon a large number of variables, but should be constant in one point: Death must be absolutely certain. The attempt on Hitler's life failed because the conspiracy did not give this matter proper attention.

The techniques portion of the manual then went on to provide details about the particular effectiveness and use of an assortment of weapons, including all types of firearms, explosives as well as blunt and sharp-edged weapons. However, the most interesting assassination techniques recommended by the CIA were:

1. Manual

It is possible to kill a man with the bare hands, but very few are skillful enough to do it well. Even a highly trained Judo expert will hesitate to risk killing by hand unless he has absolutely no alternative. However, the simplest local tools are often much the most efficient means of assassination. A hammer, axe, wrench, screw driver, fire poker, kitchen knife, lamp stand, or anything hard, heavy and handy will suffice. A length of rope or wire or a belt will do if the assassin is strong and agile. All such improvised weapons have the important advantage of availability and apparent innocence. The obviously lethal machine gun failed to kill Trotsky where an item of sporting goods succeeded.

In all safe cases where the assassin may be subject to search, either before or after the act, specialized weapons should not be used. Even in the lost case, the assassin may accidentally be searched before the act and should not carry an incrimin ating device if any sort of lethal weapon can be improvised at or near the site. If the assassin normally carries weapons because of the nature of his job, it may still be desirable to improvise and implement at the scene to avoid disclosure of his ident ity.

2. Accidents

For secret assassination, either simple or chase, the contrived accident is the most effective technique. When successfully executed, it causes little excitement and is only casually investigated.

The most efficient accident, in simple assassination, is a fall of 75 feet or more onto a hard surface. Elevator shafts, stair wells, unscreened windows and bridges will serve. Bridge falls into water are not reliable. In simple cases a private meeting with the subject may be arranged at a properly-cased location. The act may be executed by sudden, vigorous [excised] of the ankles, tipping the subject over the edge. If the assassin immediately sets up an outcry, playing the "horrified wit ness", no alibi or surreptitious withdrawal is necessary. In chase cases it will usually be necessary to stun or drug the subject before dropping him. Care is required to insure that no wound or condition not attributable to the fall is discernible after death.

Falls into the sea or swiftly flowing rivers may suffice if the subject cannot swim. It will be more reliable if the assassin can arrange to attempt rescue, as he can thus be sure of the subject's death and at the same time establish a workable al ibi.

If the subject's personal habits make it feasible, alcohol may be used [2 words excised] to prepare him for a contrived accident of any kind.

Falls before trains or subway cars are usually effective, but require exact timing and can seldom be free from unexpected observation.

Automobile accidents are a less satisfactory means of assassination. If the subject is deliberately run down, very exact timing is necessary and investigation is likely to be thorough. If the subject's car is tampered with, reliability is very low. The subject may be stunned or drugged and then placed in the car, but this is only reliable when the car can be run off a high cliff or into deep water without observation.

Arson can cause accidental death if the subject is drugged and left in a burning building. Reliability is not satisfactory unless the building is isolated and highly combustible.

3. Drugs

In all types of assassination except terroristic, drugs can be very effective. If the assassin is trained as a doctor or nurse and the subject is under medical care, this is an easy and rare method. An overdose of morphine administered as a sedative will cause death without disturbance and is difficult to detect. The size of the dose will depend upon whether the subject has been using narcotics regularly. If not, two grains will suffice.

If the subject drinks heavily, morphine or a similar narcotic can be injected at the passing out stage, and the cause of death will often be held to be acute alcoholism.

Specific poisons, such as arsenic or strychine, are effective but their possession or procurement is incriminating, and accurate dosage is problematical. Poison was used unsuccessfully in the assassination of Rasputin and Kolohan, though the latte r case is more accurately described as a murder.

EXAMPLES

Agents may be presented brief outlines, with critical evaluations of the following assassinations and attempts:

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

CIA Manual on Clandestine Assassinations published in 1953 (the same year that CIA Scientist Frank Olson was murdered by Georgetown Set and Averell Harriman owned treasonous cowards Richard Bissell and Sidney Gottlieb on orders by MI6/Queen Bitch)...

CIA Publishes Its Own "Assassin's Manual" Proof That CIA Controllers (Bilderberg) Actively Order The Clandestine Killings Of American Citizens Who Oppose Anti-Constitutional PoliciesThe CIA Manual Published In 1953 And Declassified in 1998 Outlines Methods To Make Sure The Public Narrative Covers-Up The CIA-MurderBy Making It Appear As "A Death By Natural Causes"

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Monday plans to provide the most detailed account to date of the Obama administration’s legal rationale for killing U.S. citizens abroad, as it did in last year’s airstrike against an alleged al-Qaeda operative in Yemen, officials said. . . . his speech Monday will mark a new and higher-profile phase of the administration’s campaign to justify lethal action in those rare instances in which U.S. citizens, such as New Mexico-born Anwar al-Awlaki, join terrorist causes devoted to harming their homeland.

But when GAP (and other civil liberties groups) request the legal memo justifying the killing of al-Awlaki from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), OLC maintains that the "existence or non-existence" of the memo is classified.

To review the Justice Department's completely ridiculous and indefensible position on the assassination memo:

Quote

Days after the Obama administration engages in the targeted killing of an American citizen without due process, anonymous "administration officials" leak the existence of the legal memo rationalizing the assassination to the Washington Post.

When the "don't worry, we've got a legal memo" excuse fails to satisfy civil libertarians questioning the expansion of Executive power to killing American citizens without affording a bunch of fundamental Constitutional rights (due process, jury trials, right to confront accusers, etc.), details of the memo appeared on the New York Times front page, including when the memo was written, who authored the memo, the memo's legal reasoning, and even the memo's number of pages in the memo.

Now, the Attorney General is going to give a public speech at Northwestern University Law School important enough to warrant more anonymous leaks to WaPo further detailing the "logic" of assassinating Americans.

Nonetheless, the Obama administration expects the public to believe that even revealing the "existence or non-existence" of the memo will harm national security.

So, the memo might not exist, but we know it is about 50 pages long, as if it is supposed to provide some comfort that the Justice Department will at least type out a few thousand words before sending a drone to kill Americans.

The absolute absurdity of Holder speaking publicly about a classified - possibly non-existent (as if any of us are naive enough to buy that response) - memo while the Justice Department claims it will harm national security to release the memo fits nicely with the rest of the Obama administration's schizophrenic policy on government transparency. Josh Gerstein ofPolitico reported on "President Obama's muddy transparency record:"

Quote

Administration lawyers are aggressively fighting FOIA requests at the agency level and in court — sometimes on Obama’s direct orders. They’ve also wielded anti-transparency arguments even bolder than those asserted by the Bush administration.

The administration has embarked on an unprecedented wave of prosecutions of whistleblowers and alleged leakers — an effort many journalists believe is aimed at blocking national security-related stories. “There just seems to be a disconnect here. You want aggressive journalism abroad; you just don’t want it in the United States,” ABC News correspondent Jake Tapper told White House press secretary Jay Carney at a recent briefing for reporters.

In one of those cases, the Justice Department is trying to force a New York Times reporter to identify his confidential sources and is arguing that he has no legal protection from doing so.

Compliance with agencies’ open-government plans has been spotty, with confusing and inaccurate metrics sometimes used to assess progress. Some federal agencies are also throwing up new hurdles, such as more fees, in the path of those seeking records.

The Office of Management and Budget has stalled for more than a year the proposals of the chief FOIA ombudsman’s office to improve government wide FOIA operations.

Not exactly what is expected from an administration claiming to be "the most open and transparent in history."

The Obama administration has revealed what it wants to reveal and concealed the rest, too often under the specter of harm to "national security." This brand of cafeteria government openness is more than just frustrating to FOIA requesters. It endangers a democratic society - which relies on an informed public - by reducing the public's information to pro-government talking points and Attorney General stump speeches at law schools.

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Perhaps, Breitbart's Weather Underground/(New) Black Panther/Occupy/Obama connections from college were about to be shown as part of a live op aimed at the RNC this year. Plus, Breitbart was about to blow the whistle on it knowing that he was in the crosshairs.

Breitbart knew about a false flag op that went unfinished at CPAC, one that corresponds with an Infowars callers info from Tampa with connections to the Sheriffs's office several weeks ago who warned that the RNC will be a nearly identical op to the one described in the CPAC op, with the minor addition of an Annon super-back-hack to blame what ever hack they do on themselves on the Ron Paul/truther/inforwars communities.

Occupy DC has advised people to remain "as peaceful as possible." Why the caveat there?

But some may have a different definition of "possible."

The [planning] meetings began last Thursday and lasted until Saturday. During these meetings, protesters began throwing around ideas for confusion and chaos that include dressing like Ron Paul supporters since they “generally look like hippies”, pulling fire alarms, screaming ‘fire’ during activities, “glitter-bombing” participants, blocking entrances to the hotel, and cutting electrical power- as first reported by Lachlan Markay at the Heritage Foundation.The person who obtained all the information said, “Speakers will be physically assaulted, not just verbally confronted.” Two Occupiers, who the informant also identified as members of the New Black Panther Party, “said they would be disappointed if they didn’t get arrested and planned to ‘make it count.’”

“Mitt [Romney] has Secret Service now, but [Newt] Gingrich and [Andrew] Breitbart don’t”, said another planner.

And this is enabled by the leftwing media, which has given them the greenlight -- no matter what these people do, they know that the media will cover for them.

Step aside Castro and Chavez, there's a new comrade in town ready to sell out America.

Breitbart, Anonymous and the Koch brothers, prima fascia the three could not possible have anything in common but a closer look might just change all that.

I remember the first time I learned of Andrew Breitbart, he was sitting in for a radio host I think it might have been Michael Savage. He introduced himself by saying that he mostly spends his time starring at a computer, following the news and trying to understand , connect the dots and deduce how the left is working to bamboozle and enslave us. In keeping with the late great Breitbart’s tradition let’s analyze the three apparently disparate topics we mentioned above and see if we can find any connection.

Anonymous

On march 1st the Interpol executed 25 arrest warrants on two continents against alleged Anonymous members.

I don’t know much about this group except what I read in the MSM and it’s very possible that there were some valid reasons why Interpol went after them but as events unfolded in the days following these arrests the timing of these raids is at the very least questionable.

Again I am not sure what the Anonymous agenda is but I do know that they can, being hackers, gain access to information that the powers that be, i.e. Obama might not really want made public – it wouldn’t be the first time!

Andrew Breitbart

Also on march 1st Andrew Breitbart, only 43 years old died of “natural causes” after reportedly “going for a walk.”

Andrew Breitbart previously declared that on March 1st he would reveal video tapes that will expose Obama as the Manchurian candidate out to destroy our country and our freedom. Like Anonymous Andrew Breitbart had access to the kind of information that Obama certainly does not want to be made public – it also wouldn’t be the first time.

The Koch brothers

On February 29, just one day before the Anonymous arrests and the highly suspicious death of Andrew Breitbart the Obama administration took the unprecedented step of attacking a private organization because Obama disagrees with their position. The White House is accusing the The Koch brothers of “jacking up prices at the pump” and committing as much as $200 million to defeating Obama’s reelection.”

Like Andrew Breitbart, and Anonymous, the Koch brothers too can mobilize the masses and bring to the forefront information that Obama would do anything to destroy – again that too would not be the first time.

These three incidents are very public, very high profile and very serious – what can be more serous than assassination, arrests and threatening to confiscate one’s property? The very fact that they are so public is what is so worrisome.

THIS ADMINISTRATION IS DESPERATE AND THEY WILL STOP AT NOTHING.

Are these incidents related?

Are they meant to terrorize us into cowing before the Obama dictatorship?What will come in the next couple of weeks? What do you think?

More information, Rush Limbaugh, who lives where Breitbart once lived, was sent an apparent death threat by mail in the form of a circuit board with wires protruding from a box with a message about presidential assassinations. The info is covered later in the podcast. A must listen!

I also read about Rush Limbaugh being criticized by Obama in today's news. Must be related.

So Femacamper, what's the chance of these videos surfacing in the next few months anyway? Surely he had a staff a people working for him that knew about the videos or have the videos.

His staff said they would be released in a couple weeks. I expect that they will likely be disappeared, doctored, or somehow otherwise tampered with. Perhaps they had a friendly visit from Obama's assassination squad already.

At this point, the assassination of a non-mainstream journo is 1,000x more damaging to the Obama Deception Mythology than any fricking college video even if they have him f**king squirrels while shitting on an American flag.

I mean really, WTF? The New World Order just totally f-d themselves!

[Disclaimer: I am not saying that there exists hours of videos of the president f**king varmints nor videos of him defecating on 'ol glory, or doing both at the same time. I highly doubt that any squirrel f**king videos exist and i also doubt that our president engages in such activities to begin with. The satire was meant to expose the fact that sometimes a downtrodden group of incestous control freaks like the committee of 300 will cut off their nose to spite their face, or in this case, S.M.I.T.E. an American journo without realizing the just exposed themselves as the only true National Security threat to the United States of America.]

That was good. You should write professionally in a journalistic op-ed outfit, Sane! Your quips are classic!!

His staff said they would be released in a couple weeks. I expect that they will likely be disappeared, doctored, or somehow otherwise tampered with. Perhaps they had a friendly visit from Obama's assassination squad already.

It saddens me to think that we live in a country run by thugs.

2 Timothy 3

1This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

2For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,

Perhaps, Breitbart's Weather Underground/(New) Black Panther/Occupy/Obama connections from college were about to be shown as part of a live op aimed at the RNC this year. Plus, Breitbart was about to blow the whistle on it knowing that he was in the crosshairs.

Breitbart knew about a false flag op that went unfinished at CPAC, one that corresponds with an Infowars callers info from Tampa with connections to the Sheriffs's office several weeks ago who warned that the RNC will be a nearly identical op to the one described in the CPAC op, with the minor addition of an Annon super-back-hack to blame what ever hack they do on themselves on the Ron Paul/truther/inforwars communities.

Occupy DC has advised people to remain "as peaceful as possible." Why the caveat there?

But some may have a different definition of "possible."

The [planning] meetings began last Thursday and lasted until Saturday. During these meetings, protesters began throwing around ideas for confusion and chaos that include dressing like Ron Paul supporters since they “generally look like hippies”, pulling fire alarms, screaming ‘fire’ during activities, “glitter-bombing” participants, blocking entrances to the hotel, and cutting electrical power- as first reported by Lachlan Markay at the Heritage Foundation.The person who obtained all the information said, “Speakers will be physically assaulted, not just verbally confronted.” Two Occupiers, who the informant also identified as members of the New Black Panther Party, “said they would be disappointed if they didn’t get arrested and planned to ‘make it count.’”

“Mitt [Romney] has Secret Service now, but [Newt] Gingrich and [Andrew] Breitbart don’t”, said another planner.

And this is enabled by the leftwing media, which has given them the greenlight -- no matter what these people do, they know that the media will cover for them.

The video that is going to air doesn't seem like what Brietbart was talking about..leading a rally is not in a meeting with WU. Must've took them this whole week to dig up a different video of Obama from college....watch this video won't be a big deal...no way would Fox show the real video with all the heat they're under from the left.

That is part of the video, the whole thing is on tonight on that jerk Hannities show, but perhaps more over the coming days. I still think Obama is not to worried given the situation has been more than likely "taken care of".

Mr. Obama doesn't call the shots. Recruited, mentored, protected. This man doesn't have to give the order for a hit that issue is dealt with by others, he is playing only his role and most certainly is enjoying it. Sociopaths are without conscience and what could said are normal human emotions. Skillfull socio's have adapted the practice of acting, Obama is one of these, intelligent, determined, and a professional elite con. As Mr. Bush invaded Afghanistan, (in my opinion), ABM was well aware he was to be the forthcoming president. So many folks I have spoken with in general are focusing on Oby, they are missing the forrest for the trees, this is not a one man show, this is a global conglomerate, we are the nucleus of their target. Any public figure who any pose a threat to this meatgrinder is in harms way, to emphasize this fact we have only to look back and remember the 3K's, this was their message as to their ability to remove anyone who may stand in their way.

Skillfull socio's have adapted the practice of acting, Obama is one of these, intelligent, determined, and a professional elite con. As Mr. Bush invaded Afghanistan, (in my opinion), ABM was well aware he was to be the forthcoming president.

Media outlets are frothing at the release of video that shows now President Obama a ‘radical’ Harvard rally supposedly demonstrative of racial division tactics he took part in. Indeed, Breitbart.com reports:

Earlier today, Buzzfeed’s Ben Smith announced on Twitter that video researcher Andrew Kaczynski had released “the mysterious Harvard/Obama/race video that the Breitbart folks have been talking about.”

This is surely not the video that Andrew Breitbart was dying to release at the 2012 CPAC conference weeks before his untimely death. As predicted by Alex Jones, Mancow Mueller and others, the public will be distracted with less than bombshell issue while the real revelations Andrew Breitbart said he held likely ‘go with him to the grave,’ as Mancow put it earlier today.

Instead, this ‘newly leaked’ footage of Barack Obama speaking at a Harvard rally was ALREADY released in a 2008 piece produced by PBS’s Frontline program. It shows Obama speaking in support of the controversial Professor Derrick Bell. The footage is reportedly ‘selectively edited’ and was admittedly licensed from Boston TV station WGBH, who produce Frontline.

As Paul Joseph Watson reported:

“The footage shows Obama from his Harvard days fraternizing with Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, leading members of the Weather Underground terrorist group which carried out a wave of bombings against government targets in the 70′s.”

Whether that footage, or other admittedly withheld footage of Obama speaking at a panel after a Saul Alinksky play, will ever reach the public remains to be seen.

Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately