Seeding
the 'Clash of Planets' and the 'War of the Worlds' to cement
one-World Government

Caption
'World governments should prepare a co-ordinated action plan in case
Earth is contacted by aliens, according to scientists. They argue
that a branch of the UN must be given responsibility for "supra-Earth
affairs" and formulate a plan for how to deal with
extraterrestrials, should they appear.' --- UK
Guardian 10 Jan 2011

Fabricating
a public discourse on an absurd fantasy as if it's something real by
couching it in the veneer of science (or declassified
State-Secrets/whistleblowing/leaks), and then self-servingly reacting
to that fabrication as a threat to national security at
supra-national levels from the United Nations to the Catholic Church
to justify and dignify the expenditure chasing the new immanent
threat, only legitimizes such discourse among the public as
plausible. It fertilizes the stage for the subsequent creation of a
new insurmountable global threat, the Clash of Planets. If
political scientists are to be believed on the utility of diabolical
protocols for “imperial mobilization”, then, “that
exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual
commitment, and patriotic gratification.” Its doctrinal
seeds must be planted years in advance. This new shock-therapy
threat too will also of course be launched with the dialectical
ultimatum: “either you are with us, or with the aliens”!

So
What's Next according to Project Humanbeingsfirst?

The
Alien-UFO Agenda is one such future fait accompli in the works which
can still be averted by the public becoming rationally informed about
the demonic art of the Mighty Wurlitzer. The fact that:

the
fact that the FBI recently made available a 1950 Roswell
UFO memo
lending “UFOs” a legitimacy in the gullible mind by way
of it being held as a supposed “state-secret” for these
past sixty years ;

the
fact that US military is even playing war-games to interdict
UFOs
(USAF couldn't interdict 9/11 airplanes and are therefore
determined, one surmises, to not fail against an alien UFO
technology that is advanced enough to visit earth from another
galaxy) ;

the
fact that there is a pertinent office at the United Nations,
UNOOSA,
with “the plan to make Unoosa the co-ordinating
body for dealing with alien encounters [which] will be debated by UN
scientific advisory committees and should eventually reach the
body’s general assembly”, and a special UN
Ambassador
has been “tasked with co-ordinating humanity’s
response if and when extraterrestrials make contact” ;

and
the uptick in other bogus
and absurd conversations
on Aliens and UFO even appearing in the mainstream media, not to
mention its unrelenting repetition in the so called “alternate
media” and on the internet ;

all
indicate that its unveiling time is likely approaching near.

The
reaction to this super nemesis too will surely also be launched with
“either you are with us, or with the aliens” false
dialectics!

If
the public can preempt that propaganda by focussing on unraveling the
many facets and scenarios on what they Machiavellianly
plan to do BEFORE they enact them, the vile psy-ops can surely be
defeated BEFORE it becomes the new established “facts” on
the ground for the globalists' coup de
grâce: the final restructuring of the planet into
world
government
( http://tinyurl.com/ftworldgov).

Caption
The
Next Global Threat? A Super Ali Baba Plus Plus arriving in UFOs to
terrify all mankind into uniting under the rule of one-world government?
(The U.S. Air Force first began experimenting with flying
saucers in the 1950s. Why - to deceive the former USSR, or, to induce
global mass
panic?
See Hadley
Cantril
)

Caption
Earth must prepare for close encounter with aliens, say scientists
UN should co-ordinate plans for dealing with extraterrestrials –
and we can't guarantee that aliens will be friendly Evolution on
alien worlds is likely to be Darwinian, which may mean
extraterrestrials share our tendencies for violence and
exploitation. (Image via UK Guardian, 10 January 2011 Photograph:
Rex)

Caption
'Proof of (alien) life? A copy of the 1950 memo that recounts the
discovery of flying saucers and aliens in New Mexico. The memo has
been published on the FBI website' --- UK
Daily Mail 9th April 2011.

A
more perceptive caption however would read: 'The Art of the
Mighty Wurlitzer: How to fabricate Aliens and UFOs Myths using the
ploy of leaking State-Secrets'

“If
suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species
from another planet,”President Ronald Reagan had read
out loud from his script at the United Nations General Assembly
podium in 1987, “in our obsession with antagonisms of
the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of
humanity. Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us
recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our
differences worldwide would vanish, if we were facing an alien
threat from outside this world!” --- President
Ronald Reagan, Speaking at the UN General Assembly, September 21,
1987

“It
should be as statistical as human nature, for example, that there's
going to be good guys and bad guys,” says Dr. Travis
Taylor, who's with the U.S. Space and Missile Command Department and
has worked with the Department of Defense and NASA for 20 years.

“What
we would hope is that the good guys show up first, and that would be
really nice. But the point of this wasn't to debate whether they
are or they aren't, it's what happens if they did. Do we have a
plan? What type of plan should we put together, and how would we
defend the planet?” Taylor has also written the handbook
for harrying aliens, An Introduction to Planetary Defense.

Lt.
Col. Brian De Toy, director of defense and strategic studies program
at West Point, doesn't buy the premise. “I am a skeptical
believer in miracles. So a year ago right now I was in Iraq, and I'm
more worried about Iraq and Afghanistan right now and the aliens
that I'm dealing with there. And so right now, I'm pretty skeptical
about the others.”'
--- National Geographic, Reported by Boston Herald May 17, 2011

'Aliens
might have souls and could choose to be baptised if humans ever met
them, a Vatican scientist said today. The official also
dismissed intelligent design as “bad theology” that had
been “hijacked” by American creationist fundamentalists.

Guy
Consolmagno, who is one of the pope's astronomers, said he would be
“delighted” if intelligent life was found among the
stars. “But the odds of us finding it, of it being intelligent
and us being able to communicate with it – when you add them
up it's probably not a practical question.”

Speaking
ahead of a talk at the British Science Festival in Birmingham
tomorrow, he said that the traditional definition of a soul was to
have intelligence, free will, freedom to love and freedom to make
decisions. “Any entity – no matter how many
tentacles it has – has a soul.” Would he baptise
an alien? “Only if they asked.”' --- UK
Guardian 17 Sep 2010

'Mazlan
Othman, a Malaysian astrophysicist, is set to be tasked with
co-ordinating humanity’s response if and when
extraterrestrials make contact. Aliens who landed on earth and
asked: “Take me to your leader” would be directed
to Mrs Othman. ... But Professor Stephen Hawking has warned that
alien interlopers should be treated with caution. He said: “I
imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the
resources from their home planet. The outcome for us would be much
as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t
turn out very well for the Native Americans.”' --- UK
Telegraph 26 Sep 2010

PROPAGANDA
REDUX

ASK
YOURSELF TO TEST YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT YOU HAVE JUST LEARNED

Is
it not strange that the US Military is openly playing “war
games” for the absurd possibility of an Alien Attack within
just 25 years of President
Ronald Reagan
expressing the Beneficial Consequences of a Hypothetical Alien
Threat From Outside This World speaking at the UN General
Assembly, Sept. 21, 1987? Is it not absurd that they even appoint a
UN Ambassador to greet the aliens with “souls”
seeking to be baptised when they ask earthlings in English
“Take
me to your leader”
(sic!)? What motivation drives the Hard Road to World Order which
continually requires crafting new fabled threats, new absurdities,
new wars, new crises? Fabricating a public discourse on an absurd
fantasy as if it's something real by couching it in the veneer of
science (or declassified State-Secrets/whistleblowing) and then
reacting to that invention at supra-national levels from the United
Nations to the Catholic Church, only legitimizes such discourse thus
setting the stage for the later creation of a new insurmountable
global threat, the Clash of Planets. If political scientists are to
be believed on the utility of diabolical protocols for “imperial
mobilization”, then, “that exercise requires a
high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and
patriotic gratification.” Its doctrinal seeds must be
planted years in advance. This too will surely also be launched with
“either you are with us, or with the aliens”! ---
The
Agenda Behind Aliens and UFOs.

In
order to perceptively comprehend the psychological basis of such
absurd and fabricated threats which instill existential fears:

whose
import to enabling “imperial mobilization” was
clearly envisaged by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1996 in The
Grand
Chessboard:

“It
is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be
autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially
its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist
democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of
power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in
conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of
domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is defense
spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among
professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to
democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial
mobilization.” (pgs. 35-36) ;

whose
raison d'être as the primary method for advancing “the
"national interest" by means of organized violence”,
was taken as axiomatic in the 1963-64 secret study reported in the
1967 book The
Report From Iron Mountain:

“It
must be emphasized that the precedence of a society's war-making
potential over its other characteristics is not the result of the
"threat" presumed to exist at any one time from other
societies. This is the reverse of the basic situation; "threats"
against the "national interest" are usually created or
accelerated to meet the changing needs of the war system. ... The
military, or ostensible function of the war system requires no
elaboration; it serves simply to defend or advance the "national
interest" by means of organized violence. It is often
necessary for a national military establishment to create a need for
its unique powers—to maintain the franchise, so to speak.
And a healthy military apparatus requires "exercise," by
whatever rationale seems expedient, to prevent its atrophy.”
(pgs. 31,33) ;

whose
utility for effectively embarking on the “military
transformation” required to achieve “full
spectrum dominance” that wasn't “stillborn”,
was openly declared in the Project for the New American Century
(PNAC) report titled Rebuilding
America's Defenses:

“Further,
the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary
change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and
catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. ... Until the
process of transformation is treated as an enduring military mission
– worthy of constant allocation of dollars and forces –
it will remain stillborn” (pgs. 51,58) ;

“We
are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie
Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for
the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed
throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion. The
question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war,
assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And
they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is
known to humanity. So then, in 1909, they raised the second
question and discussed it, namely: 'How do we involve the United
States in a war?'”;

please
refer to social engineering principles in Further
Study
for Operation
Gladio,
Edward
Bernays,
Human
Resources,
and The
Prisoner
television series fable of the 1960s on mind control. That topic was at
the time clandestinely being experimented upon in secret military
laboratories as in what was later revealed of the American version of it
in CIA's
MK ULTRA. The Prisoner fable uncannily captured the
entire essence of behavior modification, from hard techniques of brain
chemistry manipulation to soft techniques of Machiavelli and perception
management. Especially watch episode “It's
your funeral”.
Also see Myth
of the Cave
in Plato's 2500 years old classic The Republic, Book VII, page
300 (book
PDF).

Reprint License

All
material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with
full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety,
unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity,
provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part
of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its
main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license
violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images,
quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on
non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research
use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes
against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly
commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external
material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair
use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html.
Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you
are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your
request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents
in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the
documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You
are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from
other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.