The
Trans Pacific Partnership colossus is receiving a great deal of play
at the moment but there’s another side to the story that shows just
how criminally-focused these same corporations still are, who are
pushing to murder the rights of any nation that dares to challenge
TPP.

What
does the criminal-FTC say about this illegal-coup?

Before
I came to the web, I was a free-lance-writer submitting articles and
illustrations to magazines and newspapers that I thought might be
interested in publishing more about what was going on during those
times. One of those magazines was Ad Busters. I didn’t understand
why they refused until the Color-Revolutions were outed with Soros in
the supporting role: Surrounding the Anonymous Movement that failed
because it was designed to fail!

I
submitted three articles to Adbuster’s in 2000. The first was about
the Time-Warner heist of all private-copyrights that were to be
stolen by the ‘Big-Two’ who wanted to revolutionize everything to
do with creativity by stealing the copywritten work of every artist,
writer and illustrator who worked for either company at the time.
None of the three articles were printed.

The
second article dealt with the illegality of copywriting trees, bushes
and plants in nature: Because those who sought the copyrights had not
proven to have improved or changed anything, to legally-qualify them
to “OWN” any part of the natural world.

But
the courts rulings stood and again the human race lost out to
filthy-money and to criminal-enterprises at the expense of any future
that we might have ever had.

The
third article was the Human Genome Project and the massive rip-off of
that “project” which was another public-private-partnership that
is destroying the ability of people anywhere to retain control over
their own bodies or their own lives.

Most
still don’t know they don’t actually OWN their own bodies.
Corporation’s control many parts of millions of people because they
were allowed to patent parts of the Human-Genome, for private profit
and no - that story wasn’t followed either.

It
was more than possible, at the time, to challenge these two
Corporations on legal grounds because in the Time-Warner Crime; what
they were stealing was the copywritten work of hundreds of thousands
of people, just to make a bigger corporate footprint in the
entertainment world. The cases that challenged those copyright-thefts
were simply ignored and with the arrival of the New Millennium,
people had already lost control over the plants animals and trees as
well as food-production in the world. That fact is only just now
being faced, because of what’s at stake now in the Trans Pacific
Partnership.

Time-Warner
had no right to do what they did: But they got away with it because
unless they could steal those rights there was nothing worth
paying-for between those two criminally-inspired-corporations.

The
reasons it went through hinged upon the need for the High-tech world
to prove its celebrity in the new millennium, by stealing from the
past, while ignoring the rights of those who had created that past.
But since the company did not understand what they’d stolen, the BS
merger eventually came apart, because of their massive thefts and the
fury that their actions created…

At
the time there was no Supreme Court interference that should have
stopped the whole thing immediately because this clearly involved the
misuse of copyright laws: to create a massive commercial incentive
which has given the world Monsanto’s theft of most of the world’s
foods—through GMO reconfiguration of the entire natural world.
These copyrights have not created anything new—ergo no patent was
justified. This was done to kill the usefulness of nature: By killing
off choice to people anywhere: Corporations will soon be able to
control any choice about whatever food that anyone can eat.

Once
the natural plants have been killed by illegally-artificial and
copywritten-seeds and plants, then corporations will be in-charge of
nature and the food supply for the entire planet. These illegal
patents are already responsible for the deaths of millions of farmers
worldwide. Where the hell is the rage & the outrage that could
prevent this immediately on a global­scale!

Many
of these same issues are at-stake in the TPP agreement: But for
obviously different reasons. This illegally created global-trap is
based on another totally illegal-construct: The idea that there can
even be something in the world called: “Corporate-Nationhood”
which is a blasphemy against the world!

The
current possibility came about because the U.S. Supreme Court
illegally granted corporations the ILLEGAL paper-right of
“Corporate-Personhood” which was an incredibly obscene affront to
the entire human race!

There’s
a more personal reason for my interest in this one too. FACEBOOK has
stolen, thru their self-declared and totally-illegal “rules” over
the twice copywritten work of mine that involves over 300 images. The
reason this was a problem at the time was because I couldn’t get a
lawyer or a law-firm anywhere to take on FACEBOOK under any
circumstances: Regardless of the imperative-nature of the case that
needed to be fought and won, if the terms of the copyrights were to
be upheld.

The
creatures that did this are the same criminal-Jews that need to
arrested tried and executed for what they’ve done to the United
States. That will happen, but not because of anything they did to me.

If
you think the Monsanto Protection Act was bad, watch out for the
Trans-Pacific Partnership, a multilateral trade agreement being
negotiated in secret, which subverts national sovereignty for
corporate rule.

On Nov. 13, WikiLeaks released
the August version of a section of the TPP, the Intellectual Property
chapter, which addresses not only traditional creative copyrights,
but also genetic and pharmaceutical patents, as well as surgical
procedures.

The
still-secret latest version will be negotiated in Salt Lake City,
Utah from Nov. 19-24. A protest
is planned for noon on Nov. 19 at the host site, the Grand America
Hotel.”

k:
If
you can’t get there then at least help someone else to go in your
stead.Write
about this event. Demand answers from any and all who attend it. If
you can’t do anything else send this link to those that might still
give a damn about what’s happening in the world right now!“The
TPP forbids a member nation from passing any laws not “consistent
with the provisions of this Chapter.” In the version provided by
WikiLeaks, we see which nations propose or object to specific terms.
None of these countries object to supplanting national laws with the
TPP.Built
on the 1994 TRIPS Agreement (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual
Property Rights), the leaked chapter of the TPP came from the 19th
Round of Negotiations at Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei, and also covers
the prosecution of copyright or intellectual property infringements
or violations, criminalizing such infringements and requiring
imprisonment for what is now a civil matter.”

The
Intellectual
Property chapter
(or here)
devotes 21 pages to patents for drugs and genes; copyrights cover 16
pages, enforcement covers 24 pages, with the final section of 15
pages addressing how they plan to punish internet service providers
whose clients violate the new IP rules.

Assange
remarked: If instituted, the TPP’s IP regime would trample over
individual rights and free expression, as well as ride roughshod over
the intellectual and creative commons. If you read, write, publish,
think, listen, dance, sing or invent; if you farm or consume food; if
you’re ill now or might one day be ill, the TPP has you in its
crosshairs.

Thom
Hartmann’s read of the TPP IP chapter leads him to conclude,
“The provisions would stifle innovation, creativity, and
information sharing, all under the guise of protecting intellectual
property.” (1)

This
is about excessive copyright protections’ that were meant for
corporate use only—it was never meant to protect those who actually
create things that can be legally copywritten. Creative people are
now illegally discriminated against routinely in the courts, when
they face corporate or government interests over any given issue.
Creative people are not allowed to protect their copyright’s when
and if those copyrights might be more useful to a Corporation than to
the person that created what was copywritten in the first place. But
this is also about the right to be free to protect those ideas and
images which belong to the individual and not to god-damned
corporations that need to be charged with their crimes and forced out
of the idea of both Corporate
Personhood & Corporate Nationhood
­ because the free-will of the planet depends upon ending these two
long-ignored-crimes against humanity!