Contact Information

New York’s top court rules that parents can eavesdrop on kids

posted Apr 19, 2016, 9:22 PM by Resty Manapat

ALBANY — Parents can legally eavesdrop on young children if
they reasonably believe it would be in the child's best interest, the state's
highest court ruled Tuesday, establishing an exception to New York law against
wiretaps without the consent of at least one person on a call.

The 4-3 ruling by the Court of Appeals involved a cellphone
recording of a man threatening to beat the 5-year-old son of his live-in
girlfriend. The boy's father recorded the conversation.

"The father had a good faith, objectively reasonable
basis to believe that it was necessary for the welfare of his son to record the
violent conversation he found himself listening to," Judge Eugene Fahey
wrote for the majority.

He cautioned that the ruling shouldn't be interpreted as a
way to avoid criminal liability for wiretaps "when a parent acts in bad
faith."

The live-in boyfriend, Anthony Badalamenti, was later
convicted of child endangerment, assault and weapon possession. His attorney
challenged the tape as inadmissible evidence from illegal eavesdropping.

Fahey cautioned that courts must consider the age and
maturity of the child in considering parental eavesdropping. He didn't specify
an age.

A key question "is whether the child is capable of
formulating well-reasoned judgments of his or her own," he wrote.

In a dissent, Judge Leslie Stein wrote that the issue raises
many policy concerns that should be left to the Legislature, with implications
for divorce and custody disputes, criminal proceedings against the minor or
others, juvenile delinquency and any other dispute within families.

Even in this case, the father didn't notify authorities or
share the tape until after Badalamenti and the boy's mother were arrested months
later when neighbors heard screaming and crying and called police, Stein wrote.
The majority's ruling fails to answer whether a parent can eavesdrop over the
explicit refusal of an older child who's talking to his or her other parent,
she wrote.

Judges Jenny Rivera and Sheila Abdus-Salaam joined Stein's
dissent.

"We are pleased that the court accepted our common
sense argument that parents absolutely have the right to use a recording such
as this one to protect their child," District Attorney Madeline Singas
said.

But Attorney Marianne Karas, who represented Badalamenti,
said the court majority reached its conclusion without an initial threshold
finding that the father taping the call was acting in his child's best
interests. "He didn't do anything until way way after the arrest. If you
are in mortal danger, would you like me to record this conversation? Would that
help you?"

In a previous New York case, a midlevel court in Brooklyn
upheld a mother's use of putting a recorder in her autistic son's backpack to
tape suspected abuse by his bus matron, which was allowed as evidence of child
endangerment. However, Tuesday's decision establishes case law for the state
expected to have a larger impact.

"From my point of view, and the point of view of
attorneys who practice divorce and family law, this case does potentially open
up a Pandora's box," said attorney Eric Tepper, vice chairman of the New
York State Bar Association's Family Law Section.

"Even though this is a criminal case, you might
envision that in custody cases or in divorce cases, a parent might be tape
recording a child's communications with someone else."

The New York court said the "vicarious consent"
doctrine was adopted by a federal court in Utah in 1993 and the federal appeals
court in Cincinnati in 1998.

At least a dozen other states have recognized that doctrine,
according to Nassau County prosecutors who used the tape against Badalamenti.
They are Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, New
Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas.

Please consult an attorney for advice about your individual situation. This site and its information is not legal advice, nor is it intended to be. Feel free to get in touch by electronic mail, letters or phone calls, please withhold from sending any confidential information to us.