Find Me At Screen Rant

Thursday, April 9, 2015

Arrow: Roy is a Fool, or The People of Starling City vs. Roy Harper

On last week's episode of Arrow (season 3, episode 18), titled "Public Enemies," the walls closed in on Oliver Queen after League of Assassins cosplayers dressed as the Arrow framed him for the murder of Starling City's latest Mayor, among other victims. Ra's al-Ghul himself revealed the Arrow's secret identity to Captain Lance, prompting him to publicly declare that Oliver Queen is the Arrow and issue an arrest warrant. Oliver turned himself into police custody, but Roy Harper, the Arrow's sidekick Arsenal, decided to cosplay as the Arrow himself, attacked the police caravan, and de-hooded, announcing that he was the Arrow.

I tend to agree with Mr. Shatner. That was also my reaction when I saw Roy's gambit. But is Roy really a fool to confess to being the Arrow? If Roy remains in custody and this goes to trial, how could Roy possibly convince a grand jury that he is the Arrow and was all along? True, Roy Harper possesses intimate knowledge of Oliver Queen's activities as the Arrow, but could he ever sustain his story under serious questioning? What about Team Arrow, Oliver's accomplices? And how does what Captain Lance know about Team Arrow, including his daughter Laurel being one of them as the Black Canary, affect the case? So many questions.

Like last year, when Moira Queen was on trial for her role in the Undertaking, I turned to my lawyer friend for his legal perspective on what could be the People of Starling City vs. Roy Harper and this is his take:

With
no new Arrow on this week, I figured I’d take the opportunity to wade
back into those murky waters that are the Starling City legal system and
analyze the ramifications of Roy Harper’s “I’m the Arrow” gambit. First, since Roy’s motivation is to save Oliver, the important question
is not whether or not Roy can prove he is the Arrow and was the Arrow
all along. The question is, can the Starling City District Attorney
(let’s just assume Laurel is not handling the case for simplicity’s
sake) prove that Oliver is the Arrow in light of Roy’s public
unmasking? Or, more accurately, can the DA prove that Oliver Queen
actually committed one of the crimes being attributed to the Arrow. Presumably, he is not being charged with “being the Arrow” but rather
with the murders that the League of Assassins Arrow cosplayers
committed, in particular the killing of the mayor. Even before Roy
claimed to be the Arrow, what was the evidence that Oliver was the Arrow
in general and that he killed the mayor in particular? Captain Lance
got the arrest warrant for Oliver because Ra’s Al Ghul told Lance that
Oliver is the Arrow. Since Ra’s isn’t going to offer that testimony
under oath in a court of law, that’s inadmissible. What else is there?
Oliver didn’t actually confess. He voluntarily turned himself in after
Lance got an arrest warrant with his name on it for killing the mayor.
That’s not a confession; that’s a smart move for an innocent person to
make (as opposed to running and making yourself look guilty). Even in
the police wagon with Lance, Oliver never came right out and admitted to
being the Arrow. There was talk of the island and why he came back to
Starling, but not an outright confession to being the Arrow, let alone
to killing the mayor. So when Roy shows up in full Arrow gear and admits
to being the Arrow, there is no way to prove Oliver is the Arrow – let
alone that he killed anyone as the Arrow – beyond a reasonable doubt.
But Roy’s stunt really wasn’t necessary. Oliver should have just walked
into police headquarters, denied being the Arrow, and dared them to try
and prove otherwise (after destroying all evidence in the Arrow Cave).
But, now that we are left with Roy in cuffs as the Arrow, what happens
to foolish Mr. Harper? Roy doesn’t have to prove he is now, and always
was, the Arrow. It is still the job of the DA to prove him guilty of a
specific crime; again, presumably, killing the mayor. I assume the
evidence against Roy would be (1) the mayor was killed with an arrow,
(2) Lance saw someone dressed as the Arrow fleeing the rooftop from
which the kill shot was fired, (3) Roy confessed to being the Arrow and
(4) Roy was arrested in full Arrow gear. That’s certainly sufficient
probable cause to bring criminal charges. Sure, a good defense
attorney (say Jean Loring) would be able to
punch holes in that evidence, but if Roy was insistent in not putting on
a defense, or even just pleading guilty, he could easily wind up taking
the fall for Oliver. Way to go Roy, you’ve succeeding in sacrificing
yourself to save Oliver Queen when no sacrifice was necessary. That
should be called “Pulling a Harper.”