Bush's pledge to double the size of the Peace Corps was nothing more than hot air

In his State of the Union address in 2002, a few months after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, President Bush urged the creation of “a new culture of responsibility.” He asked Americans to volunteer and make public service a priority. To rally Americans to service, Bush created the USA Freedom Corps to push the initiative and to oversee the expansion of the Peace Corps and its domestic counterpart, AmeriCorps. Former Bush aide Les Lenkowsky, who worked on the “compassion agenda,” said it started strong after the president made it “quite clear that he didn’t want this just to be a bully pulpit.” “He really wanted policy initiatives,” Lenkowsky said. “We took him at his word and went to work on them. And now I think it is mostly, entirely bully pulpit.” That is a sad, but fitting, summary of this administration. A pledge to America was nothing more than hot air.

The softer side of conservatism President Bush once sold has all but disappeared

Thu, Jan 31, 2008 (2:01 a.m.)

Caption: President Bush at the State of the Union address where he unveiled the USA Freedom Corps and promised to double the size of the Peace Corps within five years.

In his State of the Union address in 2002, a few months after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, President Bush urged the creation of “a new culture of responsibility.” He asked Americans to volunteer and make public service a priority.

To rally Americans to service, Bush created the USA Freedom Corps to push the initiative and to oversee the expansion of the Peace Corps and its domestic counterpart, AmeriCorps.

The Freedom Corps initially boomed under its first leader, John Bridgeland, whose passion for public service and close ties to the president are credited with giving the Freedom Corps a fast start. Bridgeland told The New York Times that Bush had asked him to “design a big initiative,” and he did.

The number of people joining the Peace Corps and AmeriCorps increased. In addition, Bridgeland set up Citizens Corps, a network of medical workers and first responders who pledged to volunteer to help in emergencies.

At the time, Bridgeland was at the center of the president’s domestic agenda, the hallmark of his “compassionate conservatism.” The momentum, however, soon waned as the White House went on its crusade in Iraq and let domestic policy, and any sense of compassion, wither on the vine.

Bridgeland saw the writing on the wall. The war in Iraq consumed the president’s agenda, so he left. Other aides followed, feeling let down by the White House’s failure to follow through on this vision.

Former Bush aide Les Lenkowsky, who worked on the “compassion agenda,” said it started strong after the president made it “quite clear that he didn’t want this just to be a bully pulpit.”

“He really wanted policy initiatives,” Lenkowsky said. “We took him at his word and went to work on them. And now I think it is mostly, entirely bully pulpit.”

That is a sad, but fitting, summary of this administration. A pledge to America was nothing more than hot air.

Dodd vows to filibuster Surveillance ActSenator Chris Dodd vowed to filibuster the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that would grant retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies that helped this administration violate the civil liberties of Americans. "It is time to say: No more. No more trampling on our Constitution. No more excusing those who violate the rule of law. These are fundamental, basic, eternal principles. They have been around, some of them, for as long as the Magna Carta. They are enduring. What they are not is temporary. And what we do not do in a time where our country is at risk is abandon them."

What is the greatest threat facing us now? "People will say it's terrorism. But are there any terrorists in the world who can change the American way of life or our political system? No. Can they knock down a building? Yes. Can they kill somebody? Yes. But can they change us? No. Only we can change ourselves. So what is the great threat we are facing? I would approach this differently, in almost Marshall-like terms. What are the great opportunities out there - ones that we can take advantage of?" Read more.

Read the stories and leave your comments.

Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.

Story Source: Las Vegas Sun

This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; Presidents - Bush; Expanion; Politics; Speaking Out; USA Freedom Corps

PCOL4038201

Add a Message

This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.