Zika: vicious fraud: abortions at sea: the war on women

You’re a pregnant woman in Central America. You’ve just been told you could have the Zika virus. No tests. No confirmation. And of course, no one is telling you that Zika has not been proved to cause anything. But you’re offered an abortion at sea, because the country you live in doesn’t allow abortions, except in very restricted cases. A group will take you out on a ship, and when you come back your baby will be gone. He or she will never be born. You’re just another casualty in the campaign to provoke fear, but now it has been your very personal experience.

“Now Women on Waves, an organization which uses ships to offer safe abortion services outside the territorial waters of countries where the procedure is restricted or forbidden, has announced that they will begin serving areas affected by Zika.”

“Women on Waves is aiming to give them [pregnant women] a safe, legal alternative. They will provide medical abortions to pregnant women who have Zika in Colombia, Bolivia, Chile, Guadeloupe, Paraguay, Venezuela, Argentina, Surinam, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Panama, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic. Eligible women must be less than 9 weeks pregnant and are required to fill out an online application to receive the abortifacient drugs. The group has said getting a shipment of the medicine to patients can take between one and five weeks, meaning it will require a woman who discovers she’s pregnant to act very quickly to receive help in time.”

But this hasn’t stopped the fear mongers. And now we have abortions at sea, based on zero truth and zero science.

Put this together with the travel warnings governments have been issuing to women, and the advisories (“don’t get pregnant for two years”), and this is turning out to be a war against women.

Depopulation by press conference.

Who will be held responsible? No one.

Unless people begin to speak out and ignore the roar of the press and the lying public health agencies.

The abortions will continue. Pregnant women will never know the truth, that the loss of their children was created by propaganda.

Margaret Chan, the director of the World Health Organization, has admitted that the causal connection between microcephaly (the birth defect) and the Zika virus has not been demonstrated. It is “strongly suspected.” However, in order to respond quickly to the “crisis,” the world must act on a suspicion.

Someone should point out to her that abortions at sea are now a consequence of what her advisors have told her to suspect.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

I’m really enjoying your break downs. As soon as I heard about Zika I thought, “this is Jon Rapport 101. He’s going to tear it apart.” I was right.

Women on Waves must have some pretty intense funding in order to accomplish multinational sea based abortions.

A couple things that come to mind extemporaneously:

This gives an opportunity to any women who want an abortion for any reason to get it off sea. Some at least will lie and say they have Zika in order to get the abortion. Agencies will likely use those distorted numbers as “evidence” of the crisis. If there is a stark increase in abortion will this be the beginning of discussions of legal abortions in South America? There are definitely a wide range of powerful interests who support abortion, but is there an abortion industry? could this be a way for such an industry to gain a foothold in South America? I bet the market that deals in fetuses took a blow from that USA shake out of planned parenthood, even if it was whitewashed. This South American abortion rush could be a way to recoup for 2015 losses potentially. South America gets the World Cup, the Olympics, but if they really want to modernize they need to have population controls. Maybe this is what we are seeing. After all, the pope is from South America. It’s been catholic land for a while. The current pope has shown other leanings towards the modern globalists. Perhaps a formal deal has been reached over the territory. A south American union is in the works no doubt.

Couldn’t agree more. He’s the reason that the Ebola scam became so obvious to me. It prompted me to research Aids, other viruses, and so on. Once you see how thin the evidence is in most cases, you can clearly see what’s been orchestrated by the establishment.

Very important points. How on earth can a supposed non-profit organisation suddenly be in a position to mount massive operations for potentially thousands of South American women on the high seas, with the necessary medical expertise and drugs. Obviously they are getting a lot more funding and support than the meagre $80k in donations they list in their last budget statement (2014) on their website.

I notice that of the $80k donations most comes from the Hivos foundation. It lists its partners as including the EU Commission, the Global foundation (Gates et al) and the Ford Foundation! Bingo! Women on Waves is more than just a bunch of Dutch abortion on demand zealots but is sure to be a NWO front as well.

If anyone has any more information on who is backing this group please post on Jon’s site!

Jon you hit it on the average size head, it’s all about population control by press. Zealots at sea…good God.

Making women wait till 2018 till they get pregnant. Why 2018?…why not 2019 or 20 or 21. Why 2018?

I guess this has been a week of head measuring; people out with micrometer and calipers and tape measures, measuring heads.
What if you come from a family with small headed people. What does that mean…I had some friends who were from Sicily the whole family were little with big heads. And I have seen families of little people with little heads.

What if you spent too much time talking to a psychiatrist? those bastards have been shrinking heads since Jesus was cowboy. If we count the shrunken heads those guys have caused…thats a epidemic in its self.

South America is famous tribes who liked shrinking heads. The Maya and many South American tribes and people admired sloping foreheads and smaller heads on people, it was a practiced art form. This was about beauty in action. And we have descendents of that once common practice still around.

I took a look at charts and graphs, on baby head sizes; well there a whole science behind head measurement.
Do you know how many categories of head size there are related to ethnicity, the number of weeks pregnant?
I don’t wish to make light of any deformity, there are obviously very deformed heads; but whose doing this measuring? And how does head size relate to intelligence and cognition? And at what point do you say…”Ah, he has a really small head, he is microcephalic”?

Have you ever gone into a hat store? Well I have, a lot of times, I have worn a Chicago style Biltmore hat for years. And hats come in a variety of sizes. From 6 1/8 to 8 1/4.
Should I worry if my head is smaller compared to larger? Are there just as many macrocephalic heads as microcephalic? What is normal head size? Because I don’t thing there is a normal head size. If your head is proportionate to your body, your normal, I think to a point. But if your Mayan or a South American tribal people, there could be variances.

But I got a feeling this is not going to die down for a while; we are going back in time, to when the eugenicist were out measuring heads of black men in the southern United States, or the slums of New York and the Industrial cities of the twenties and thirties.
This is going to be the center of attention for quite a while, it’s going to explode into all kinds of head measuring clubs and symposiums on small heads and complete nonsense.

Well, isn’t this whole thing progressing at break-neck speed… don’t want to give anyone time to think about it. The WHO has been itching for a pandemic and will do whatever it takes to make it so. Not too long ago, they issued a release about a particularly virulent strain of TB circulating around the globe. Checked the stats and turns out there were 8 cases in Pakistan and 4 cases in an adjoining country. It was laughable. When it was announced that ZIKA was acquired via sexual contact, my first thought was that they were trying to make it the new HIV/AIDS. Simply mad…go ask Alice!

I notice the very long comment which appears to contradict your figures, Jon, but you have discussed this before. What is meant by “confirmation”, even? Does the presence of anti-bodies convey the existence of viral materials or is that a “presumption”?

As viral materials are made of inorganic materials that have somehow fused with body systems, it is no surprise that viruses are “hard to identify”.