Bubble Theory Again... Revenge Of The Bubble

Pincho, please be sure to tell us when you get your Ph.D. in psychology. I assume you are conducting an experiment to evaluate the reaction of participants on forums when they are faced with infantile, garbled brain farts. I am intrigued to know what results you have seen and how you will interpret them. If they are published in other than your thesis, please let us know the citation.

Google AdSenseGuest Advertisement

Imagining doesn't mean shit. I can imagine what you say, I can also imagine that the universe and all that exists was created by a Giant Space Duck who feeds on the electromagnetic fields of planets, this doesn't make it so.

Google AdSenseGuest Advertisement

Imagining doesn't mean shit. I can imagine what you say, I can also imagine that the universe and all that exists was created by a Giant Space Duck who feeds on the electromagnetic fields of planets, this doesn't make it so.

Click to expand...

But then you have added parts, and the idea is to remove all of the parts, and then evolve them. Remove every duck that science has added.. thousands of them, and then start from scratch. No G duck, no singularity duck, no inflation duck, I am removing the ducks. You just want the easy route, I want the hard route. Do you think I added the web in the bubble from imagination? No that is created by spherical stacking. Spherical stacking means that only 12 sphere can touch 1 sphere. If the central sphere is under pressure, there are 12 escape routes. But it is unlikely that the pressure would be exactly equal on all sides, and that creates 6 escape routes in 2D, and that's a hexagon, and 6 hexagon lines to a bubble membrane is web shaped, and also electron orbit shaped, and snowflake shaped, and hand, and feet, and body shaped. You evaluate the shape from the kissing problem, and you don't just add it by imagination.

You are ignoring the = sign. It is included in the maths. = is a check. So you are allowed to check the result.

Click to expand...

Firstly = is not 'a check', it is an equivalence relation. Secondly what are you comparing? Distances. The definition of distance is something non-trivial. You define distances using metrics or norms (they are different things!), of which you can pick many for some spaces.

For instance, suppose you're considering points in 2 dimensions. How far is the point (x,y) from the origin (0,0)? If you use the Euclidean norm it is \(||(x,y)|| = \sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}\). If you use the Manhattan norm it is \(||(x,y)|| = |x|+|y|\). If you use the infinity norm it is \(||(x,y)|| = max(|x|,|y|)\). If you use the Lp norm then it is \(||(x,y)|| = (|x|^{p}+|y|^{p})^{\frac{1}{p}}\) (so the L2 norm is the Euclidean one and the L1 norm is the Manhattan one). And this is just a simple case, never mind issues like curved spaces like in general relativity (which is just applied Riemannian geometry).

So before you can even use the = to 'check' distances you have to define distances. And thus also assumes you're already working in some kind of space, with different directions. Vector spaces are non-trivial mathematical concepts either.

Furthermore if you're going to have a theory of everything you never to explain where this space comes from. You can't say "This thing is at that point" because 'points' are places in space so you're presupposing space. Loop quantum gravity doesn't presuppose the existence of space-time at all and tries to construct it. In string theory space-time is an ensemble construct due to lots of closed strings. It is possible to construct valid, consistent string dynamics in spaces which do not have the notion of points. Distances are meaningless in such constructs but string theory can still be done in them.

So while you think you're making no assumptions in terms of mathematics you've actually made a ton of them. The reason why you don't realise it is because you have such a poor mathematical background and you don't realise just how far even basic high school mathematics is from true first principles of logic.

In the 1910s Russell and Whitehead tried to write a single set of books which developed mathematics from true first principles, called Principia Mathematica. It took over 360 pages for them to develop enough logical structure to show 1+1=2. 360 pages. That is how far even 1+(-1)=0 is from true base axioms.

For many years I have been posting my Bubble Theory or Black Hole Theory On the internet, and on this site too. I started my theory on bubbles in 2004. I also posted that I can't do maths. This starts debates on my theory being a waste of time. But I feel that I have predicted so many things now that I should be taken at least a bit seriously. Afterall, my Bubble Theory is a Theory Of Everything.. with no maths.

I know that I am in for some flak, I am used to flak. This is the real Theory Of Everything...

First.. the Aether exists.

Second.. Gravity is a push from outside the Earth, a bump between Aether particles.. very small.

Third... Atoms are holes in the Aether.

Fourth... Magnetism is the release of pressure from Gravity pushing into those holes. opposed pressure.. a bubble.

Fifth.. The Aether uses negative mass in its construction. It is 50% positive mass, and 50% negative mass. This means that in a relaxed state it equals zero. In a negative mass state it is a hole, and the hole gets filled by more Aether.. this hides it under a false mass attribute which also equals zero. This is also Gravity. The filling of negative Aether is the filling of our atoms with Aether, the atoms are negative mass holes. The holes fill with Aether, the Aether travels to the next holes in the atoms, and finally the Aether travels into the Earth. When combining all of these results with the outflow of Magnetism, the Aether through our body is hidden inside pressure equality. But the extra pressure towards the Earth remains. So on the moon, two weights will fall to the moon at the same speed, because only the moon pressure is part of the result.

Sixth... My theory eliminates the Big Bang, and replaces it with an Aether bump. Aether can bump Aether even if it is zero.. flat lining. The bump is how the Aether is propagated. It's neighbor bumps it, but the Aether does not have its own propulsion. Newtons Cradle style. The Aether is therefore bumped into holes, and the holes are in atoms. This creates the bending space time illusion. A flow into the Earth, is the same as a dip towards the Earth.

Seventh... so a Galaxy can form anywhere that there is enough Aether to cause a big enough bump. The Aether will then be folded into negative mass, and more Aether will fall on top of it. The Black hole at the centre of a galaxy. The Aether will then need a way out of the hole, the opposite force to Gravity... Magnetism. This will create a huge bubble around the Galaxy.. the Flattened Beach Ball. More bubbles will come from the Black hole.. already discovered. finally the new Voyager Bubbles which I predicted in 2004.

Finally, if my theory is true, it makes many new predictions.

That a flow is required into the sun to power it, and the flow causes the Mercury orbit to fluctuate, and moves its magnetic field away from the centre.

That the Big Bang never happened, but was in fact just pressure variations in the Aether.

That the Universe expands because the bubbles around Galaxies are a repellent magnetic force. But should you have the inertia to break through them you can get through them.

Anti-Matter is just pressure holes in the Aether. And matter is the pressure release.

It's a theory of Everything.. I could post for years, but I'm ready to stop for awhile.

Click to expand...

The supposed aether has dual characteristics, and I don't quite see the materials like atoms as holes in it, but a reduction of it, like points where it is simmered or calmed down.

The universe has those patterns, light producing objects and material, and dark areas that gobble up light and have little material.

Some theories are starting to include Black Hole type physics below the Quantum Physics similar to me. This version is part of string theory, and uses corrugated hole structures...

I cannot post links...

Google Search...

Signs of a Stranger, Deeper Side to Nature’s Building Blocks

I know why they want it to be corrugated, to pass the energy along, but I use rotation to pass the message along, similar to eyes in a way. Our eyes take in the photons, we rotate the eyes to capture those photons, then the message moves to the back. I use rotating particles to capture energy, and pass it along in a hexagonal construction.

I have seen other uses of black hole particles since I posted. My theory is inevitable, there is only one Universe, and so you will end up using the true mechanics of this Universe, and you will end up with my theory in the end.