Law

First of all, this new law is directed at protection from the possible hacker attacks. But also it considerably limits the rights of users in distribution and use of information from the Internet.

Essence of the law

The law is extremely simple: Internet service providers have no rights to distribute the acquired information outside the People’s Republic of China. If it is about getting Internet data from other countries, then all information becomes the subject of careful check and analysis from the state committee. But this is only about information which is necessary for business or other important issues. The regular citizens who are simply wishing to visit the foreign sites after approval of this law will not be able to leave virtually borders of their country anymore. With the release of this law the state can also freeze all accounts and stop activities of physical persons and legal entities if there are suspicions of information laws violation. The equipment also shall take a number of state tests, and only after that it can be used.

The authorities of China claim that this law is a guarantee of the country information security, but representatives of many other countries think differently. They believe that this law is a banal censorship, and also attempt to create intolerable conditions for the companies of non-Chinese origin. Though the trade relations with China are profitable both to the republic, and to other states, the government creates obstacles for this purpose. But everything is not such sad as it can seem at the first sight – there are special VPN services which allow bypassing blocking and censorship. It is possible to find VPN service on AntaNET website that will be most suitable for your needs.

The opinion of the Chinese authorities

After a release of such cybersecurity law, there were a great number of dissatisfied people who consider that this is restrictions with infringement of human freedom. It is interesting that about violation of the rights speaking generally foreign representatives while the authorities of the People’s Republic of China persistently ignore the opinion of their citizens.

The chief officer of Internet information issues Jieliang Zhao has declared that new law directed only on increasing the level of information security and protection against the hacker attacks. In his opinion, there is no sense to create difficult levels of protection or to select huge expensive VPN services for each entity. Much more reasonably is not to allow a possibility of the attack. Jieliang emphasizes that this “increasing level security” doesn’t interfere with trade and work of foreign investors at all. On the contrary, China is always glad to new and old commercial intercourses from the abroad.

The control toughening

It is necessary to tell that passage of the law of cyber security is not the unique project toughening censorship which been accepted in China recently. The information about pressure on liberal opposition regularly arrives in media. The press publishing materials about infringement of freedom are subjected to persecution too.

The specialists from the USA assume that it is not the last identical law and the government of the People’s Republic of China will continue creating a barrier to citizens between country and outside world. It’s more than likely that the situation will become even tougher. But to isolate China completely will be very hard because the modern technologies allow bypassing even the toughest borders. To such technologies is possible to refer various anonymizers and VPN services which allow keeping in secret the user’s location.

When taking advantage of success fee remuneration method, the lawyer serves as the ‘first judge’ to to a greater extent than in the hourly rate or fixed price basis. Rational attorneys screen out cases in which the probability of winning is low. Thus, the unlawful demands are claimed in court, which saves time both for the court and the client. This does not mean that the client will be limited in accessing justice mechanisms, as she can always find another lawyer who will take up his case, or else to agree with her lawyer to another method of payment, such as hourly rate basis. However, it is necessary to adequately assess the complexity of your case, otherwise a lawyer, manipulating the high level of complexity of the proceedings and a low probability of winning, can convince the client of the need to increase the remuneration for participation in a simple process.

It is believed that the success fee is an added incentive to ensure high quality services, as it creates a link between the personal interest of the lawyer and the client’s well-being, given that only in the case of winning a lawyer will be rewarded.

Not all customers are able to immediately appreciate the quality of services: it is much easier to make some part of remuneration as part of the compensation, and then, if you win the case, pay for quality services of the company representative.

On the other hand, the success fee may cause a conflict between the lawyer and the client’s wishes due to the difference on the percentage that the representative will receive in case of winning.

The underwater rocks

A lawyer does not have to be accountable for every action the client to provide an accurate record of costs, in the case of ‘success fee’ tool, which saves time and enables the lawyer to concentrate on the development of the legal position, rather than at the time of implementation of administrative work. However, it may depend on the particular company – the more trustworthy it is, the more chances you will get decent quality services. Thus, if you are considering the UK options, consider Forster Dean Solicitors, the company concentrating its efforts on accident claims and no win no fee practices that stands out from the crowd with thoroughly optimised inner processes. The company is listed as ‘Customer choice’ section at Solicitors Guru platform – perhaps, the most comprehensive legal providers hub in the UK where u can find a solicitor. And there you can also read more on the no win no fee subject.

For the customer it is easier to calculate their costs for a lawyer, because he most often does not understand all the nuances of the process, it is important result.

Success fee opposers claim that such payment tool violates the essential principles of the legal profession as a lawyer: in aspiration to win, the lawyer could use such means as misrepresentation and deception. On average the customer can hardly define the probability of winning the case and she may be subjected to pressure by the lawyer, who, by manipulating a low probability of winning greatly overestimates the percentage of the recovery.

Also, a lawyer can take advantage of the weak position of the vulnerable client who needs help and who is not able to adequately assess the situation in relation to your emotional state. Thus, lawyers can pursue their own goals by ignoring the client’s goals, focusing on feelings of revenge and retribution.