With so many good questions that I hope are answered with 100% honesty and sincerity from GLG, is it possible for this to be a two part interview. I want to make sure glg has plenty of time to answer all these questions. I know his game load isnt very high atm, but I like it would like to be polite all the same.

cookie0117 wrote:. . .So inviting people to private games under the pretense of "teaching them the game/map", when really you are charging them 5-6 points to see how to get their asses whipped. Without giving them any lessons or advice on the map during game play. . .

wrong on several counts -- your facts are old/mixed up:NO PRETENSE:- I haven't promised to teach them the game in well over a year- when I DID promise to teach, I did -- in detail: and 2 people earned 1,000 and 2,500 pts from those mapsCHARGING 5-6 PTS TO GET ASSES WHIPPED, but 5-6 pts:- to offset RISK of -60, -80, -100 pts to me -- it's like a raffle/lottery to them- so they should pay 20 pts to get beat by others?- privates-sgts that play high ranks SHOULD expect to lose -- they LIKE playing higher ranksWITHOUT GIVING ANY LESSONS.. . DURING GAME PLAY:- DURING the game? and add more risk to losing 60-100 pts? are you insane? I run a business here- see above, I rarely promise lessons - but when I did, I delivered

Please get your facts straight before exaggerating/BSing the public

GLG

* * *WARNING: all baiting/flaming items have been scrubbed from this reply

I would do it like this (after making sure that a list actually makes sense to make):

wrong on several counts -- your facts are old/mixed up:NO PRETENSE:

I haven't promised to teach them the game in well over a year

when I DID promise to teach, I did -- in detail: and 2 people earned 1,000 and 2,500 pts from those maps

CHARGING 5-6 PTS TO GET ASSES WHIPPED, but 5-6 pts:

to offset RISK of -60, -80, -100 pts to me -- it's like a raffle/lottery to them

so they should pay 20 pts to get beat by others?

privates-sgts that play high ranks SHOULD expect to lose -- they LIKE playing higher ranks

WITHOUT GIVING ANY LESSONS.. . DURING GAME PLAY:

DURING the game? and add more risk to losing 60-100 pts? are you insane? I run a business here

see above, I rarely promise lessons - but when I did, I delivered

Please get your facts straight before exaggerating/BSing the public

Or like this:

wrong on several counts -- your facts are old/mixed up:NO PRETENSE:

I haven't promised to teach them the game in well over a year

when I DID promise to teach, I did -- in detail: and 2 people earned 1,000 and 2,500 pts from those maps

CHARGING 5-6 PTS TO GET ASSES WHIPPED, but 5-6 pts:

to offset RISK of -60, -80, -100 pts to me -- it's like a raffle/lottery to them

so they should pay 20 pts to get beat by others?

privates-sgts that play high ranks SHOULD expect to lose -- they LIKE playing higher ranks

WITHOUT GIVING ANY LESSONS.. . DURING GAME PLAY:

DURING the game? and add more risk to losing 60-100 pts? are you insane? I run a business here

see above, I rarely promise lessons - but when I did, I delivered

Please get your facts straight before exaggerating/BSing the public

OR

wrong on several counts -- your facts are old/mixed up:NO PRETENSE:

I haven't promised to teach them the game in well over a year

when I DID promise to teach, I did -- in detail: and 2 people earned 1,000 and 2,500 pts from those maps

CHARGING 5-6 PTS TO GET ASSES WHIPPED, but 5-6 pts:

to offset RISK of -60, -80, -100 pts to me -- it's like a raffle/lottery to them

so they should pay 20 pts to get beat by others?

privates-sgts that play high ranks SHOULD expect to lose -- they LIKE playing higher ranks

WITHOUT GIVING ANY LESSONS.. . DURING GAME PLAY:

DURING the game? and add more risk to losing 60-100 pts? are you insane? I run a business here

see above, I rarely promise lessons - but when I did, I delivered

Please get your facts straight before exaggerating/BSing the public

OR

wrong on several counts -- your facts are old/mixed up:

NO PRETENSE:

I haven't promised to teach them the game in well over a year

when I DID promise to teach, I did -- in detail: and 2 people earned 1,000 and 2,500 pts from those maps

CHARGING 5-6 PTS TO GET ASSES WHIPPED, but 5-6 pts:

to offset RISK of -60, -80, -100 pts to me -- it's like a raffle/lottery to them

so they should pay 20 pts to get beat by others?

privates-sgts that play high ranks SHOULD expect to lose -- they LIKE playing higher ranks

WITHOUT GIVING ANY LESSONS.. . DURING GAME PLAY:

DURING the game? and add more risk to losing 60-100 pts? are you insane? I run a business here

1. now that you're not allowed to use your current method of cheating/abusing will you:a. come up with a new method of cheating/abusing?b. use one of the other existing methods of cheating/abusing?c. start coming down the scoreboard?

2. your username + your desperate desire to be conqueror by any means are methods of compensating for something?

“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku

Okay, guys, I dislike bogrolling and GLG's methods as much as anyone else, and possibly more than many. Nonetheless, I think we've had quite enough questions about bogrolling and GLG's warning. It really doesn't contribute to restate the same question in 30 different ways.

Can we have some question that are generally inquisitive?

I'm going to lock the thread for now, not because I think it should stay locked, but because I think we need time to step back and ask ourselves "what would we like to know about GLG that we don't already know?" rather than "what clever way can I call GLG a cheater in the form of a question?"

Dukasaur wrote:Okay, guys, I dislike bogrolling and GLG's methods as much as anyone else, and possibly more than many. Nonetheless, I think we've had quite enough questions about bogrolling and GLG's warning. It really doesn't contribute to restate the same question in 30 different ways.

Can we have some question that are generally inquisitive?

I'm going to lock the thread for now, not because I think it should stay locked, but because I think we need time to step back and ask ourselves "what would we like to know about GLG that we don't already know?" rather than "what clever way can I call GLG a cheater in the form of a question?"

Exactly.

Keep any passive aggressive or rude comments to yourself. You know when you make one, and we do too. Be civil here.