We know that the manufactures can ask the FCC to withhold certain technical details about their radios as they go through the FCC evaluations. But can Manufactures also ask the FCC to delay announcing their approval of the radio?

Then manual is written in anticipation of successful completion of such testing (if it didn't pass, we wouldn't be able to market it). That said, the test lab advised us yesterday that all tests passed and documentation is being sent to the FCC. So, the FCC Grant is expected within a week or so.

I was just going on that you had stated that the production models may be different. For one maybe 4AA batteries instead of a battery pack.
For me I would have like to see if another system might be added or could be added . I did not like the battery pack on the BC-2500.

With the final design, charge while on (as long as internal temperature < 38C) is possible. Also, overall RF performance is improved. No change in physical design, but the front cabinet is now fully tooled (texture added).

With the final design, charge while on (as long as internal temperature < 38C) is possible. Also, overall RF performance is improved. No change in physical design, but the front cabinet is now fully tooled (texture added).

Bring it on, Paul! Bring it on . . .

The SDS100 looks pretty darn nice to me as is, and I'm looking forward to getting my hands on one ASAP.

I'm also guessing that many of the firmware upgrades we've recently received for the x36 radios will find their way into the SDS100.

Thanks . . . and I'm stiil amazed that you've been able to pull this off while dealing with some serious health issues.

With Whistler's announcement of a competitor to the SDS100, this horse race should get interesting. Can't wait to see early pics of Whistler's product (they also announced a base version by the way in addition to the portable version.)