brookboy123 wrote:
snuffy.....annie doesn't want any of the behavior that got the other boards closed.

Please try to behave.

Then tell your leech buddy to shut his yap before I shut it for him.

I donated and didn't give anonymity a second thought. What is it about Pete that causes you concern?

Other than patents, business successes, boxing skills & sooper high I.Q., is there anything else you would like to remain anonymous about?

lololol.

Having said that Evil took a cheap (truly heavily discounted) shot at sniffy when none was warranted IMNHSO. That's actually the kind of thing I would expect from sniffy maybe rather than evil but perhaps they have more in common than I actually previously had noticed.

Help me understand when it is that it's not warranted with snuffles.

He did not address the comment to you nor was it in any way an insult or slight to you. It was an (alleged anyway) expressed concern about anonymity. You chose to take a cheap shot. Perhaps because sniffy has done the same to you. So why are you really any different than him if that is the case.

So he shouldn't be treated the same way he treats me and others? I'll have to disagree with that. He reaps what he sows.

I didn't say that he shouldn't be treated the way he treats you and others. I did say that what you did was take a cheap shot which is what he has been known to do. how are you two really any different? Did he hurt your feelings evil? <G>

Right, I treat him like he treats me and others. That's not a cheap shot, but it sure seems to have gotten your panties in a bunch.

Lord_Snuffington wrote:
Then tell your leech buddy to shut his yap before I shut it for him.

I donated and didn't give anonymity a second thought. What is it about Pete that causes you concern?

Other than patents, business successes, boxing skills & sooper high I.Q., is there anything else you would like to remain anonymous about?

lololol.

Having said that Evil took a cheap (truly heavily discounted) shot at sniffy when none was warranted IMNHSO. That's actually the kind of thing I would expect from sniffy maybe rather than evil but perhaps they have more in common than I actually previously had noticed.

Help me understand when it is that it's not warranted with snuffles.

He did not address the comment to you nor was it in any way an insult or slight to you. It was an (alleged anyway) expressed concern about anonymity. You chose to take a cheap shot. Perhaps because sniffy has done the same to you. So why are you really any different than him if that is the case.

So he shouldn't be treated the same way he treats me and others? I'll have to disagree with that. He reaps what he sows.

I didn't say that he shouldn't be treated the way he treats you and others. I did say that what you did was take a cheap shot which is what he has been known to do. how are you two really any different? Did he hurt your feelings evil? <G>

Right, I treat him like he treats me and others. That's not a cheap shot, but it sure seems to have gotten your panties in a bunch.

Pete wrote:Bandwidth is not cheap, my friends. Leave fifty cents or a dollar now and then to help keep this place open. if you cannot leave a tip, it's no problem whatsoever! Simply register and have a good time! :
Amazon also has email-able gift cards available in denominations as small as fifty cents that would allow you to remain anonymous: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=gc_slp_occa ... 2238192011

Lord_Snuffington wrote:
Then tell your leech buddy to shut his yap before I shut it for him.

I donated and didn't give anonymity a second thought. What is it about Pete that causes you concern?

Other than patents, business successes, boxing skills & sooper high I.Q., is there anything else you would like to remain anonymous about?

lololol.

Having said that Evil took a cheap (truly heavily discounted) shot at sniffy when none was warranted IMNHSO. That's actually the kind of thing I would expect from sniffy maybe rather than evil but perhaps they have more in common than I actually previously had noticed.

Help me understand when it is that it's not warranted with snuffles.

He did not address the comment to you nor was it in any way an insult or slight to you. It was an (alleged anyway) expressed concern about anonymity. You chose to take a cheap shot. Perhaps because sniffy has done the same to you. So why are you really any different than him if that is the case.

So he shouldn't be treated the same way he treats me and others? I'll have to disagree with that. He reaps what he sows.

I didn't say that he shouldn't be treated the way he treats you and others. I did say that what you did was take a cheap shot which is what he has been known to do. how are you two really any different? Did he hurt your feelings evil? <G>

Right, I treat him like he treats me and others. That's not a cheap shot, but it sure seems to have gotten your panties in a bunch.