Click here To understand the USA VALUES Button Program; and that we need you to look around on our special coupon website. You don't need a cluttering white paper to double opt-in to join our list. Use the contact page. Thank You.

Story
of PVofPE-Prek Present
Value Reconciled from the Top
Down

The value of a positive
expectation can be recognized (at least $500,000) from the top down. This value has already been innovated into
the private sector economy of any family that can pay for early learning. Requirement is to see the
child developing at a reasonable pace with peers as the control.

No disrespect is
intended when one concludes from the top down that more study is not required.

The business community
understands the PVofPE-Prek investment numbers and how growth and future
savings are values. Business understands there is a FTFRTFT requirement to the
expectations. The community needs every family and business and non-business
organization, including the faith base and the schools to understand FTFRTFT
demands reprioritization along the lines of

“OMG- I cannot be a part
of leaving $500,000 of possible value behind when it is this simple”

An interesting powerful
story that deals with this value is The
Street Lawyer by John Grisham, on pages 406 and 425 of the paperback. At
least read the end of the story from page 370 because it is much more than a
calculation when public perception is added and fingers start pointing at what
was done and not done by the strongest for the weakest. It ends with a Good Samaritan reflection but
our concentration is on the value of an at risk pre-k child before and after alleged
wrongdoing and cascading positioning. We
will use bullet points to summarize the story.

Very prominent business
acts and under values the worth of a mom and 4 children most at risk.

A law is broken and other
events cascade resulting in their death.

The business wanted to
value the lives of the preschoolers at $50,000 because the children were going
nowhere based on mom’s development. Very
likely the children would remain in poverty.

The courts in valuing
wrongful deaths have said the positive expectation cannot be considered outside
of reasonable evidence and tracking toward estimates of realized economic
expectation.

However, the plaintiff
placed a value on each child at $1,000,000 because that is the minimum value
the business would ask for, if it were their partner’s or employee’s children.

So the courts will
project value based on probable expectations evidenced by ……….., to include
readiness and very informal comparison to expectations based on peer group.

The business knew they
would not win the case in the eyes of the public, or a jury and was going to do
everything they could to settle. The
plaintiff wanted a public trial to increase the settlement value.

The case was already
being tried in the newspaper and the good name of the business was depreciating
as the claim gave rise to negative reports of wrong doing.

The business had no defense
for not doing what they could have done. They ignored the law and damaged the weak
family. The extended family could not be
found but it made no difference.

The marketed image of
the business, its public perception was being damaged anew each day and the
powerful owners of the company could do nothing about it. The leverage to make it stop existed in the
grassroots not the boardroom.

The plaintiff leveraged
the grassroots perspective through the press of public opinion.

The plaintiff leveraged
the perspective of fair and respectful public policy each chance they had.

The story case settled
at the $1,000,000 per child level, made reasonable with time payments. It
triggered the wise old leader of the business to emotionally think about first
things first right the first time and act to fill in the gaps they could
address with reestablished generosity.

The point we want to make with the story is that the $500,000
PVofPE-Prek is so very reasonable from the top down. Just the emotional and ethical thinking of what can be simply done
first things first right the first time for all age 0-6 children should be the thought of the decade.

WHAT CAN BE MORE
IMPORTANT THAN POSITIONING FOR THIS EXPECTATION ($500,000) of present value for
each and every at risk child (last count 2,000,000 children per year)