It's hyperbole when you go to the extremes with your own stance. It's undermining someones argument when you do it to someone else's stance on a topic.

Click to expand...

Really what it is, is putting words in another’s mouth. It’s the worst kind of arguing because it causes your opponent to have to back the argument up to re-establish what the argument is actually based upon rather than furthering the argument with new points to discuss.

This is not correct. Hilton went from leading the NFL in receiving yards with Luck to getting 944 with a replacement level QB.

So is Eli Manning, but I wouldn’t take Luck over him, either. Do you really think that if they situations were reversed, Luck wouldn’t meet or exceed what Wilson has done? I think Wilson would’ve been much more challenged in the mess in Indy.

Click to expand...

Who knows. You cant just snap your fingers and change players around.

Wilson not only has won more, but he also has a substantially higher QB rating as well.

I think its hilarious you also point out players injury histories when it suits your argument but ignore Luck's. Missing over a season and a half.

And comparing Wilson to Eli? Ok Kerouac. That's just dumb. Do you really want to open that can of worms?