Deep-Sea Mining Adds to Fears of Marine Pollution

Deep-Sea Mining Adds to Fears of Marine Pollution

by

Michael McCarthy, Environment Editor

The environmental worries thrown up by the prospect of deep-sea mining are considerable, not least after the Gulf oil spill, which has become an intractable problem owing to the depth of the seabed where the well is sited. (photo from NOAA, Ocean Explorer)

Concerns about large-scale marine pollution,
fuelled by the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, are set to be heightened by a
new development in exploitation of the oceans: deep-sea mining.

The Chinese government has just lodged the first
application to mine for minerals under the seabed in international
waters, in this case on a ridge in the Indian Ocean 1,700 metres (more
than 5,000ft) below the surface.

The Chinese
are hoping to recover valuable metals such as copper, nickel and cobalt -
used in mobile phones, laptops and batteries - as well as gold and
silver, in an area of currently inactive "hydrothermal vents",
underwater geysers driven by volcanic activity.

Some of the vents, known as "black smokers", are
black chimney-like structures which shelter their own ecosystems
of little-known creatures, while emitting a cloud of hot, black
material containing high levels of sulphur-bearing minerals, or
sulphides.

Having explored the area using
remotely operated underwater vehicles, the Chinese want to mine the
sulphide deposits of a region of seabed in the south-west Indian Ocean
for the rich mineral ores they contain. They have already applied to do
so to the International Seabed Authority (ISA), the Jamaica-based body
set up under the 1982 UN Convention on The Law of the Sea to deal with
the liabilities relating to seabed exploitation and the environmental
damage it may cause.

The application, which will
be heard at a meeting next April, is the first to be made for
permission to mine in international waters, but it is likely to be
followed by many more, especially if the Chinese succeed. A major seabed
sulphide-mining project is already under way in the waters of Papua New
Guinea, run by the Toronto-based company Nautilus Minerals.

The environmental worries thrown up by the
prospect of deep-sea mining are considerable, not least after the Gulf
oil spill, which has become an intractable problem owing to the depth of
the seabed where the well is sited. It has become clear that once
something goes wrong at such a depth - in this case 1,500 metres, or
nearly 5,000ft - putting it right is immeasurably more difficult than at
the surface.

Although no one knows exactly
what damage a deep-sea mine would do to the marine ecosystem, experts
have no doubt that removing a considerable part of the sea floor would
cause a major disturbance.

Not only that, but
plumes of sediment - which may well be toxic - could have an impact over
a much wider area, especially for filter-feeding marine organisms,
which are common on the seabed. Such plumes might also block out light,
hindering the development of plankton.

"At the
mouths of these hydrothermal vents are some of the world's richest but
least-known ecosystems, and the potential for conflict between commerce
and conservation is huge," said Charles Clover, author of The End of The
Line, the best-selling indictment of over-fishing, which has been made
into a widely praised film.

The Chinese were
taking it very seriously, Mr Clover said. "The reality is, they are
identifying gold mines under the sea. The Chinese have played this by
the book, but they lodged their application on the very first day it was
possible, on the first day of the compliance regime for mining
sulphides, which had taken the ISA seven years to establish."

Richard Harrington of the Marine Conservation Society (MCS) expressed similar
concerns: "This is seriously deep exploitation of our sea floor and in
the first instance we would question if this strategy would really be
economically viable," he said.

"We've seen how
difficult it has been to cap the oil in the Gulf - would the risk of an
accident be worth taking? MCS is currently campaigning for marine
protected areas to ensure protection of the sea bed around UK waters,
where the damage to the marine environment from activities such as
dredging and trawling are all too obvious.

"Deep
sea mining would take this sort of damage to a new level in the wider
oceans. Conditions at this depth are normally very stable, and any
mining damage would impact the environment for a very long time."

Interest in deep-sea mining began in the mid-1960s
with the publication of a book by JL Mero entitled The Mineral Resources of The Sea, which
suggested that there was a near-limitless supply of certain metals
contained in manganese nodules, potato-sized lumps of compressed
sediment on the sea floor at depths of 5,000 metres or more. Over the
next 20 years, the US, as well as France and Germany, conducted research
projects on nodule mining, but these were eventually abandoned after
hundreds of millions of dollars had been spent.

However,
over the past 10 years the demand for metals from the exploding
economies of the main developing countries, led by China, has led to a
resurgence of interest in sea-bed minerals; the focus for this has now
switched from nodules to hydrothermal vents, discovered by American
scientists in 1977 in the Galapagos rift in the Pacific seafloor. Now
they have been found all around the world, and have astonished
scientists with the teeming communities of specialised deep-sea animals
they support in the darkness - often at temperatures of more than 400C.

Further

With the toxic Bibi circus in town - cue talk of "tentacles of terror" - find hope in the extraordinary Combatants For Peace, a joint effort by weary Israeli and Palestinian veterans of violence who've laid down their guns to fight for peace. Led by a former IDF soldier and Fatah militant who both lost daughters to the conflict's "unrightable wrongs," they insist on the need to "hear what is painful" and talk to your 'enemies': "Partners for peace always exist. You only have to look for them."