Christine Negroni riffs on aviation and travel and whatever else inspires her to put words to page.

Friday, August 27, 2010

Hot or not? Iceland style.

Photo by and courtesy of S. Stefnisson

The end of summer draws near. Temperatures fall and the dust settles around Iceland’s Eyjafjallajökull volcano. Far away from the white hot glare of the media, Iceland’s president is demonstrating a flying lesson; every event provides an opportunity to learn.

Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson has invited geologists, pilots, regulators, airline executives and yes, even the press, to come to Iceland in September to review what happened in April when Eyjafjallajökull volcano issued the belch heard round the world.

To recap - since something that happened four months ago can seem practically pre-historic - from April 15-23, while Eyjafjallajökull was happily spewing its abrasive ash directly into the North Atlantic jet stream, 300 European airports shut down causing airlines to cancel thousands of flights stranding 7 million passengers. SAS Airlines claims to have lost $68 million, British Airways, $250 million.

"What's interesting is the fact that the eruption was not considered to be a major eruption," Thorgeir Palsson, former director of civil aviation in Iceland told me in a phone conversation this morning. "It had an impact beyond proportion. People knew an eruption that could cause difficulties and would take re-routing, but that it would close down the entire airspace, that no one had expected."

But of course that just underscores the delightful quip made by President Grimsson in his invitation to the conference at Keflavik International Airport, “The earth is capable of ultimate surprises.” He then suggested to the aviation industry that “systems must take into account the will of nature.”

Photo by and courtesy of S. Stefnisson

Cutting directly to the chase, Tom Hendricks, Vice President Operations and Safety for the Air Transport Association called the airline losses, “eye-watering”. He told me, “It was bad enough for the U.S. carriers, it almost brought the European carriers to their knees.”

Tom was flying as a captain for Delta Airlines at the time. When European aviation authorities began closing airspace, Delta and other U.S. airlines started canceling their flights rather than have their passengers, crews and airplanes grounded, even though Delta has experience flying planes in areas of volcanic activity. The European authorities were “too conservative,” he said “This was a new experience for them, but the U.S. has operated safety for well over 2 decades.”

“The U.S. model delegates the responsibility to the operators - to the airlines," Tom said. "Airlines are managing their own risk but the Europeans chose to shutter vast areas of airspace that we thought were safe to operate in.”

Thorgeir Palsson Photo courtesy IATA

So next month, these disputes will get vented once again. Were the authorities overly aggressive in restricting flights? Are there ways to safely navigate around volcanic eruptions? Who should decide when it is safe to fly and when it is not, airlines or aviation regulators? Is there value in what Dr. Palsson and others are calling the "American approach"?

Safely protected by time if not by distance from the now-spent fury of the volcano, representatives from the whole alphabet soup of aviation organizations - a diverse crowd - will descend on Iceland to dissect what happened, with a few clocks ticking.