Asahan - Meiliana was sentenced to 18 months in prison for complaining of too loud azan volume. Meiliana's complaint was considered as blasphemy of Islam. In return, the temple was burned.

The case occurred in 2016. At that time, Meiliana's complaint reached the mosque management in Tanjungbalai, North Sumatra. Residents around do not accept and feel their religion is insulted. In return, the temple's place of worship was burned and destroyed by the masses.

After going through the legal process, the following is the punishment for the destroyer of the temple as summarized from the website of the Supreme Court (MA), Thursday (08/23/2018):

1. Abdul Rizal was sentenced to 1 month 16 days.2. Restu is sentenced to 1 month and 15 days.3. M Hidayat Lubis was sentenced to 1 month and 18 days.4. Muhammad Ilham was sentenced to 1 month and 15 days.5. Zainul Fahri was sentenced to 1 month and 15 days.6. M Azmadi Syuri was sentenced to 1 month and 11 days.7. Heri Kuswari was sentenced to 1 month and 17 days (subject to theft case).8. Zakaria Siregar with a sentence of 2 months and 18 days.

The sentence to eight names above was tapped by PN Tanjungbalai on January 23, 2017. While Meiliana was sentenced to 18 months in prison by the Medan District Court on August 21, 2018.

A Buddhist woman’s conviction this week on blasphemy charges has alarmed many in Indonesia who were already worried about the erosion of religious pluralism in the world’s largest Muslim-majority country.

Meiliana, a 44-year-old Buddhist from the island of Sumatra, was convicted Tuesday of violating Indonesia’s controversial blasphemy law and sentenced to 18 months in prison. Her crime: complaining about the volume of the Islamic call to prayer blasted by a mosque’s loudspeakers near her home.

Last year, popular former Jakarta governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, who is a Christian and is commonly known as “Ahok,” was sent to prison for two years under the blasphemy law for allegedly disrespecting the Koran.

Meiliana, who like many Indonesians uses only one name, may appeal the decision against her, even though convictions of this type are rarely overturned.

The case has made Meiliana a minor cause celebre among more-liberal Indonesians, and the country’s two largest Muslim organizations have criticized her conviction.

“She did not commit blasphemy. What she did was offer a neighborly complaint, and that is not an insult to Islam,” said Ismail Hasani, a legal expert at the Islamic State University in Jakarta and research director at the Setara Institute for Democracy and Peace, which he said would work with other civil society groups to fight Meiliana’s conviction. “More generally, we believe that the blasphemy law itself does more than anything else to limit freedom of religion in Indonesia.”

Indonesia, a multiethnic democracy made up of thousands of islands, officially recognizes six religions as fully equal under the law and has long been viewed as one of the most tolerant Muslim-majority nations in the world. But developments in the past few years, including Ahok’s conviction, proposed legislation to ban homosexual acts and the rise of Islamist political groups, have worried supporters of the secular approach.

This month, Indonesia’s relatively moderate president, Joko Widodo, stunned his more-liberal supporters by announcing that his running mate in his reelection bid next year would be Islamic cleric Ma’ruf Amin. In his role as head of the Indonesian Ulema Council, Amin was influential in the push to jail Ahok, a former close ally of Widodo.

Meiliana’s case has become part of the larger debate over religious pluralism. By Thursday, tens of thousands had signed an online petition asking Widodo to “Free Meiliana, uphold tolerance!”

Her case has also sparked discussions about the call to prayer itself and its volume.

“I love the sound of the azan,” Indonesian stand-up comic Sakdiyah Ma’ruf posted to her Twitter account, referring to the call to prayer. “But really, as a Muslim that just had a baby, the loud dawn calls to prayer coming from several mosques at once can sometimes be disturbing.”

Like Ahok, Meiliana is part of Indonesia’s ethnic-Chinese minority, which has often been subject to discrimination. Human Rights Watch has found that the blasphemy law has been used to persecute a wide variety of groups, and it estimates that at least 22 people have been convicted under the law since Widodo assumed office in 2014. Along with groups such as Amnesty International and the Setara Institute, Human Rights Watch has been actively campaigning to revoke the blasphemy law.

“These blasphemy cases infringe upon people’s rights,” Hasani said. He added, referring to the president by his nickname, “And the fact that they have continued indicates that Jokowi probably doesn’t care too much about that problem.”

The great Islam has Greater Hidden Facts. To know them all, please, make yourself familiar with the provided site link.

So destroying a temple gets fewer total days in prison than complaining about the mosque's noise. The complaint is "blasphemy" but burning a temple isn't? Hardly an unbiased judiciary, then.

‘Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs and literary traditions. They neither intermarry nor eat together, and indeed they belong to two different civilisations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions.’ Muhammad Ali Jinnah

Fernando wrote:So destroying a temple gets fewer total days in prison than complaining about the mosque's noise. The complaint is "blasphemy" but burning a temple isn't? Hardly an unbiased judiciary, then.

There is an issue that islamic organization give a pressure to the judge to give heavy punishment to Meiliana