The Heroin Users Of Today Are Drastically Different From 50 Years Agohttp://www.businessinsider.com/demographics-of-heroin-users-have-changed-2014-5/comments
en-usWed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 -0500Tue, 03 Mar 2015 18:21:55 -0500Pamela Engelhttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/538771d2eab8ea6a7eb36469NotSheepThu, 29 May 2014 13:43:46 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/538771d2eab8ea6a7eb36469
It is quite simple really. The allies are growing so much opium in Afghanistan (over 6600 metric tonnes this year), that all the heroin users on the planet couldn't consume it even if the tripled their dose and died. So the Bankers and their drug pawns the CIA hatched a plan to "launder" the opium into legal prescription drugs. By 2004 pharma lobbyists convinced health services in both the USA and Canada to prescribe more opiates, I quote "We have lots and they are cheap". Doctors then began to prescribe more and more, soon whole communities were hooked on Oxy, Ativan, morphine, etc etc. By 2007-08 they announced "we don't understand why but we have a real addiction problem", go figure! So they started to restrict the prescription opiates, and at the same time the CIA flooded the streets with cheap heroin. Of course the people that were hooked on prescription opiates soon shifted their usage to heroin, because "there is lots, and its cheap". It is a contrived Hegelian Dialectic first you use health care to make addicts, and then cut their supplies while at the same time offering cheap and plentiful heroin on the streets.
Then I saw this article on Bi <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/nypd-officers-will-carry-naloxone-2014-5" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://www.businessinsider.com/nypd-officers-will-carry-naloxone-2014-5</a> and my comment is pasted below...
Of course they want to protect drug users, if they overdose they can't buy more heroin. Who is behind this big push? The federal government of course, and who is in charge of their drug distribution? Eric Holder. So lets just break this down a bit. There is an estimated 25000+ fatal heroin overdoses a year in the USA, if this drug Naloxone saves even 50% and the average user spends around $1200 a month that means $15,000,000 more heroin sold a month, or $180,000,000 more sales a year. The USA has an estimated 669,000 heroine users in 2012, up over 100% from 2007. If current overdose rates increase the USA will lose 1/3 their heroin market in the next decade. So of course they want to protect their investment, it makes good business sense to keep your customers alive. That does not include other money spent into the economy of course. Don't you all just love our drug dealing governments, and the copious amounts of opium that is coming out of Afghanistan. Oh and FYI each one of those heroin users consumes a fair supply of prescription opiates as well, ie Oxy-C, perco, lorazepam, etc etc.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/538741e86bb3f7bd2729a00fSlickWillieThu, 29 May 2014 10:19:20 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/538741e86bb3f7bd2729a00f
Heroin smugglers should be shot dead in the street.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5386efc66bb3f7b47afedb59ApqIAThu, 29 May 2014 04:28:54 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5386efc66bb3f7b47afedb59
So maybe the end of the "war on drugs" is because it's outlived its usefulness as a means of hobbling black people by "achieving" such high felony rates for minor drug charges?http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5386efbc69beddee5bfedb5bApqIAThu, 29 May 2014 04:28:44 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5386efbc69beddee5bfedb5b
So maybe the end of the "war on drugs" is because it's outlived its usefulness as a means of hobbling black people by "achieving" such high felony rates for minor drug charges?