With the release of BYU physics professor Steven E. Jones 30-page
report on the controlled demolition of the WTC towers over three weeks ago, one deafening question keeps pounding through
my mind: why aren’t the Democrats-liberals-progressives taking this information and screaming it from the mountain tops?

Moviegoers in the upcoming months will be bombarded by films
about the Iraq war and 9/11. These movies will uniformly reinforce the official party line that 9/11 was carried out by 19
Arabs with box cutters and that the invasion of Iraq was a heroic act of liberation in the defense of America.

On Monday, 11/14/05, Tucker Carlson welcomed Brigham Young
University Professor Steven Jones to the 'Situation.' Steven Jones, a professor of physics, believes that the hijackers may
not have brought down the towers by themselves (Actually he said Moslems didn't do the WTC demolitions).

A recent article published on The Sydney Morning Herald, reiterated
the theory suggesting that the twin towers did not fall because they were hit by the plane, but because an electronic demolition
made them collapse.

An advertisement, the brainchild of Jimmy Walter, who believes
that the U.S. Government was involved in a conspiracy, shows puffs of explosives coming out the sides of the buildings as
they topple. The ad, which ends with a voice saying: "Reopen the investigation and address the unanswered questions of 9/11",
has been airing in New York for over the past few month.

Able Danger was not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.
Weldon has claimed, "There's a cover-up here. It's clear and unequivocal". Freeh makes a good case for an investigation, saying
"The Joint Intelligence Committees should reconvene and, in addition to Able Danger team members, we should have the 9/11
commissioners appear as witnesses so the families can hear their explanation why this doesn't matter." Many other Americans
would like to hear that explanation, also.

It was interesting to hear from the 9/11 Commission again on
Tuesday. This self-perpetuating and privately funded group of lobbyists and lawyers has recently opined on hurricanes, nuclear
weapons, the Baltimore Harbor Tunnel and even the New York subway system. Now it offers yet another "report card" on the progress
of the FBI and CIA in the war against terrorism, along with its "back-seat" take and some further unsolicited narrative about
how things ought to be on the "front lines."

Former FBI Director Louis J. Freeh slammed the 9/11 Commission
Thursday saying it ignored – or "summarily rejected" – the most critical piece of intelligence that could have prevented the
horrific attacks of September 11, 2001.

Except for Ellen Mariani, whose husband was reported on Flight
175, others who lost relatives on the airplanes have kept quiet in stark contrast to those who lost loved ones at Ground Zero.
But when those from the 'airplane community' talk like Linda Gay and Frank Calley, who respectively had family members on
Flight 11 and 77, they accept the government 9/11 story hook, line and sinker.

How long must we wait to judge the validity of the September
11th conspiracy theories that have floated around on the Internet for years? I believe there is a way to grant status and
authority to the many excellent reports and analyses whose only sin is that they appear in electronic form instead of newsprint.
Moreover, we should start this process right away. After all, if our government is behaving maliciously, we need to know it,
communicate it to others, and act on it with urgency. This will require that we make judgments about September 11th now and
not wait for ‘perfect proof.’

BYU Professor Has Plenty of Company in the Academic Community,Including
60 Faculty Members from Two Utah Universities Who Concur a Controlled Demolition Most Likely BroughtDown the WTC and
Further Investigation Is Needed

In writing this paper, I call for a serious investigation of
the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned
explosives. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus damage alone caused complete
collapses of all three buildings. And I present evidence for the explosive-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested
by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government.
Read the report in full.

Those who have bothered to read the 9/11 skeptics know about
the extraordinary "coincidences" that took place that fateful morning. One of them happens to be the lack of routine video
surveillance tapes of ANY of the passengers alleged to have boarded the ill-fated flights at Boston's Logan, Newark's Liberty
and Washington's Dulles international airports.

In a recent 30-page report, BYU physics professor Steven E.
Jones arrived at a conclusion which, although certainly not new, would produce a paradigm shift in thinking so monumental
that it would rock the world to its very core. Yes, Professor Jones is now confirming and reiterating what many of us in the
alternative media have been saying for 4+ years: that the attacks of 9-11 on the WTC towers were actually a controlled demolition,
and that they weren’t carried out by 19 Arab hijackers.

The ATM card of Waleed Iskandar was returned to his parents,
allegedly found by the Ground Zero Recovery Team on Sept. 11, 2002. Questions remain as to why it turned up a year later and
how could such a flimsy card survive such a towering inferno?

In writing this paper, I call for a serious investigation of
the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned
explosives. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus damage alone caused complete
collapses of all three buildings. And I present evidence for the explosive-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested
by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government.

In a paper posted online Tuesday and accepted for peer-reviewed
publication next year, Jones adds his voice to those of previous skeptics, including the authors of the Web site www.wtc7.net, whose research Jones quotes. Jones' article can be found at www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html.

On the morning of 9/11 a little known Cincinnati television
station ran a story saying Flight 93 landed at Cleveland International Airport instead of crashing into the Pentagon as claimed
in the official government story.

Reporters at WCPO Channel 9 quoted then Cleveland Mayor Michael
R. White as saying "a Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing due to a bomb threat," the airplane landing safely,
moved to a secure location and evacuated.

Calling worldwide attention to the U.S. government lies surrounding
the Pentagon crash, the book l'Effroyable Imposture (The Horrifying Fraud) was published in France. The book makes a strong
argument that Flight 77 did not crash into the Pentagon on 9/11.

The 9/11 Commission Report did not even once mention the word
"explosion" or "bomb". The mainstream media hasn't touched the evidence of bombs in the trade center. Democratic and republican
politicans smear anyone who even raises the issue as a conspiracy nut. Isn't it time that we faced the elephant in the living
room? Can our democracy survive if we don't?

This site is wholly non-partisan, and not intended to criticize
or to bolster any political party. The sources cited come from across the political spectrum. The issues raised transcend
political differences, and are vital to conservatives, liberals and moderates; they affect your life whether you are a republican,
democratic, independent, or non-voter.

This website provides links to credible sources, so that
you can easily check the information for yourself. Just read and click. And then make up your own mind.