On 19/10/2007, Kalman Noel <kalman.noel at bluebottle.com> wrote:
>> data ExistsNumber = forall a. Num a => Number a
I'm without a Haskell compiler, but shouldn't that be "exists a."?
IIRC forall will work too, but the "right" way to do it is "exists",
right?
So to avoid confusion, use "exists" rather than "forall" when you want
existential rather than universal quantification.
Also, you might want to instantiate the existential type in the class too. E.g.
class Render a where
render :: a -> IO ()
instance Render ... where -- lots of these
data Renderable = exists a . Render a => Renderable a
instance Render Renderable where
render (Renderable a) = render a
Now we can call "render" on both the actual renderable values
themselves, as well as well as the "wrapped" ones.
--
Sebastian Sylvan
+44(0)7857-300802
UIN: 44640862