Buy

Purchase Options

Share

Read Later

Although it’s increasingly common, telecommuting may be hazardous to employee evaluations. But employers can take steps to ensure that remote workers are judged fairly.

advertisement

These days, more and more corporate employees are working at least part of the time from home offices. Working from home, or other types of remote work arrangements such as using a drop-in work center, can be beneficial to both employees and companies. However, our research suggests that these nontraditional arrangements also have hidden pitfalls. Employees who work remotely may end up getting lower performance evaluations, smaller raises and fewer promotions than their colleagues in the office — even if they work just as hard and just as long.

The difference is what we call passive face time. By that we are not referring to active interactions with coworkers or clients, but merely to being seen in the workplace. To be credited with passive face time you need only be observed at work; no information is required about what you are doing or how well you are doing it.

Even when in-office and remote employees are equally productive, our research suggests their supervisors might evaluate them differently because of differences in their passive face time. Especially in white-collar settings, the presence or absence of passive face time may influence evaluations used to determine the fitness of employees for specific tasks such as team leadership. As Jack and Suzy Welch wrote in a 2007 BusinessWeek column:

Companies rarely promote people into leadership roles who haven’t been consistently seen and measured. It’s a familiarity thing, and it’s a trust thing. We’re not saying that the people who get promoted are stars during every “crucible” moment at the office, but at least they’re present and accounted for. And their presence says: Work is my top priority. I’m committed to this company. I want to lead. And I can.

Related Research

For the last decade we’ve studied the concept of passive face time from the perspective of hundreds of corporate workers, including both supervisors and subordinates. (Details of our research were published in the June 2010 issue of Human Relations. See “Related Research.”) We used observation, unstructured interviews and tightly controlled experiments to gather information about how passive face time affects employee evaluations. This data led us to three key findings.

Member

Subscriber

About the Authors

Kimberly Elsbach is a professor of management and the Stephen G. Newberry Endowed Chair in Leadership at the Graduate School of Management at the University of California, Davis. Daniel Cable is a professor of organizational behavior at the London Business School.

18 Comments On: Why Showing Your Face at Work Matters

ann.bamesberger | July 3, 2012

I have great respect for Kim Elsbach (and hope she remembers me from the Stanford days). However, I am saddened that “passive face time” may just be the easy alternative for managers who still do not know how to lead by example and manage by results, and unfortunately write evaluations based on perceptions of physical presence rather than real work product.

In today’s world of social networks finally making it into the workplace, I truly hope that trust can be extended, then validated, rather than defaulting to the “tyranny of face time” (as quoted by Margaret Wente in the Toronto Globe and Mail from the original Atlantic article “Why Women Still Can’t Have it All”).

What kind of a global economy defaults to face time over contribution……

monirom | July 6, 2012

Sending your boss an email at odd hours of the night has no real value unless said boss is also up at that same odd hour and working on the same project. Often that manager can assume that you are less productive at work than your peers and need to work extra hours to accomplish the same workload.

I tend to agree with Ann Bamesberger that it is a sad commentary on the state of affairs when facetime, passive or otherwise, trumps productivity and results.

I also wonder if the study might be a wee bit myopic and may not have considered or included enough of the working arrangements of the new economy – where everyone, managers included, are often calling in to video/phoneconference because everyone is working remotely.

Last, I have to believe these findings reflect results of companies that do not produce a tangible product or measurable service. For those individuals who create, the quality and success of the final product is more important than how many people saw us working on the finished product.

Toan | July 6, 2012

Amen to that.

wynand.winterbach | July 6, 2012

I get frustrated by articles like this.

Managers are ill-placed to judge the work of anyone. Peers have a much better idea of how valuable a team member is. The face-time problem would be less of a problem if we use peer evaluation instead.

All of this is a symptom of the fact that managers have too much power and are seldom held accountable for their actions. We preach efficiency and hard work and yet we indulge the whims of managers just because, well, I have no idea, but it is not in the name of efficiency or hard work.

One way to deal with this management problem is to find a more equal balance of power. A manager that penalizes people for not showing face will think twice if he or she can be penalized for such actions.

Jason Ames | July 7, 2012

Excellent response Ann. I honestly take this article with a grain of salt. Ten years of research puts us back to a time when social computing in both consumer and enterprise environments was in its infancy. We are much more globalized now than we were just 5 years ago, and large organizations have teams that span the globe and work together seamlessly without so-called face time. We have managers that live across the country and themselves work from home. We have half of our teams working in India, China and South America. We use web meetings, instant messenging, etc. to engage in real time, ad-hoc meetings and share and collaborate like never before. How can something as archaic as physical presence actually hold back a technology driven generation? It can’t… and for those companies that think a progressive environment is wearing business casual instead of ties and dress suits, you should “right size” your leadeship and get a new VP of HR. We are a performance driven generation. You can hang around the water cooler and discuss golf and last night’s game hoping for your promotion because your VP saw you in the hallway…I’ll have engaged my remote team a dozen times before you get back to your desk.

R Karath | July 10, 2012

It seems that most people work from home for convenience. I am remote because I work on the East Coast and the company is on the West Coast. I had to leave my state to find a job, and I’m not the only one. Flying out to get “face-time” isn’t something that’s going to get approved on the Expense Management side, so there has to be other solutions and considerations.

d.moses | July 12, 2012

Great points by ann.bamesberger! We’re in times where management skills will make the difference more than ever. Working remotely should be considered just like any other business tactic in the manager’s tool box who is doing its very best to achieve corporate goals. It can be used in all kind of circumstances even in cities like Montreal, Canada where the city is paralyzed by roads and bridges in construction. http://www.ugoburo.ca/en/blog/telework-coworking-save-our-roads/

GIOVANNI FEDERICI | July 17, 2012

I get the point: we are trying to build a Company BU of “remote” workstation.
I felt that we have to deal with this kind of problem.

If you know you can avoid!

joseph.rohde | July 25, 2012

Out of sight out of mind?
With the advances in Video Collaboration and up to date licensing (port based, not by named user) dropping the costs to mere dollars per month it’s not only possible to be connected constantly, it’s becoming mandatory. This is another case of management practices needing to catch up with technical capabilities.
At Evogh we have persistent virtual rooms open all the time, and can see and talk to one another as needed. Even if we’re not talking it’s reassuring to see colleagues at a glance and know that I am not alone.

tazpiano | August 6, 2012

I think in the comments we missed the point of the article. It was to make us aware that we unconsciously give attributes to “passive face time”. Being aware that we have a tendency to do this can help us to asses people more objectively. There are teams that are completely virtual, and they already account for this issue. But for teams where one or two people may work virtually while the rest of the team is in the office, this becomes more of an issue and I think this article was addressed to that audience.

[…] home. This can limit the bonds you share with coworkers and keep you out of the industry loop. (Working at home also reduces your “passive face time,”_kmq.push(["trackClickOnOutboundLink","link_53e39e8ec4528","Article link clicked",{"Title":"Working […]

[…] also includes a study by Kimberly Elsbach and Daniel Cable that found “Why Showing Your Face at Work Matters.” The researchers found that a factor that affects employers’ perception of employee […]

[…] A study at MIT showed that “employees who work remotely may end up getting lower performance evaluations, smaller raises and fewer promotions than their colleagues in the office — even if they work just as hard and just as long.” […]