Thursday, February 21, 2013

"Asteroids are nature's way of asking: 'How's that space program coming along?'"

... nobody knows whether a massive asteroid is heading toward Earth next week or next century, the events of Asteroid Friday should serve as a wake-up call to us all. We're at the bottom of a well, and somebody is throwing rocks. Shouldn't we do something about it?

How about this: let's take all the money we waste (tens of billions of $ so far) on the global warming hoax and spend it on our space program, with an emphasis on protecting us from catastrophic meteor strikes.

Let's use our resources to protect us from actual risks, instead of lining the pockets of Al Gore.

18 comments:

Problem solved. Just take the $450 billion subsidies for oil and natural gas production, not in total but each and every year, and put it into a program to protect us against dangerous asteroids or comets...

Global warming isn't a hoax. It's based on the well known and well understood properties of greenhouse gases. According to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, with an albedo of 30%, the Earth should have an average temperature of -18 degrees Celcius. Instead of 15 degrees Celcius. Greenhouse gases result in warming of around 33 degrees. Humans increasing greenhouse gases by burning enormous amounts of fossil fuels will increase the global temperature above that it would otherwise have.

Calling AGW a hoax is a bit rich coming from someone who reckons that Thomistic evolution is a good theory. Thomistic evolution, which reduces to 'survivors survive'.

And anyway, an asteroid or a comet will never collide with the Earth. God wouldn't allow it. God, after all, directs the motion of all particles in the Universe, even electrons, so if there is an asteroid or comet on a collision course with the Earth, it's presumptive for humans to be attempting to prevent it...

I'm certainly against subsidies for any business, but if I know anything about liberals and facts it's that they don't really get along. You're going to have to show me some kind of authoritative source for this number.

Numbers one and two are definitely not subisidies. I don't think that number three is either, though I may misunderstand what they mean. I believe that it just means that the very high costs of searching for and oil and digging wells is also a deductible business expense.

At least number one and two allow the oil companies to keep more of their own cash. A subsidy is when the government writes you a check.

From Wiki: The dictionary [Concise Oxford] defines it as "money granted by state, public body, etc., to keep down the prices of commodities, etc.”

I predicted, even before you answered the question, that the "subsidies" you were referring to were in fact tax deductible business expenses that allowed oil companies to pay less in taxes. That only works when you assume that all money rightly belongs to the government and if they let you keep more of it, that's like a big gift.

In the United States, business expenses are tax deductible whether you're Exxon-Mobil or a mom and pop store. This isn't a sweetheart deal. From the Wikipedia entry you referred me to: "However, many of the "subsidies" available to the oil and gas industries are general business opportunity credits, available to all US businesses (particularly, the foreign tax credit mentioned above)."

How did I know that "subsidies" he was referring to were actually the very same tax deductible expenses that all businesses are entitled to? This is why we can't have a conversation with leftists. They change the meaning of words at will and they lack the honesty required for open discourse. We can't talk through your storm of bullcrap.

Thank God for global warming. Ice is no one's friend. Goklany (2009, Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons) estimates (based on death certificates) that cold events kill twice as many people as heat events (Table 4). Of course, given the Rapture Science Progressotard Apocalypto Theory of Humanity-As-Plague, mass death is a thing to celebrate. As long as the Progressive nomenklatura have central heating, that is.

But I'm afraid we don't have the time or the resources for asteroid defense. NASA's Director John Bolden is on record saying that President Obama tasked his agency, first and foremost, to "[F]ind a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math, and engineering." I imagine they have their hands full with that, all things considered.

"Let's use our resources to protect us from actual risks, instead of lining the pockets of Al Gore."

And, since "liberals" *need* environmental catastrophes over which to pointlessly obsess, they can turn their attention to the on-going decay of Earth’s magnetic field. From their point of view, it’s almost perfect:1) It is scientific2) It is real (OK, that’s a minus from their perspective)3) It has the potential to “end the world as we know it”4) There is absolutely nothing we can do about it4a) … No matter how much we might spend to “solve” it

From the “liberal” point of view, the *really* bad thing about the collapse of Earth’s magnetic field is that there seems to be no way to blame it on modern/industrial Western civilization.

Pépé, I am more expecting old-fashioned and general electrical use -- and thus, the entire physical basis of our easy modern life -- to be blamed. For, the measurments of the magnetic field's decay extend back a century and a half.

At the measured rate of decay, the magnetic field has a half-life of about 1400 years.

Actually there are things we could do with an asteroid found to be on a collision course with Earth. We need to see these things coming in time to do those things. A robotic spacecraft could be launched to intercept and attach itself to the 'roid. Then precise burns of it's attitude thrusters could change the course of the 'roid just enough so that it would miss the Earth. And a miss is a miss. Got to start changing that course early though...

"The Christian idea of the world is that it originated in a very complicated process of evolution but that it nevertheless still comes in its depths from the Logos. It thus bears reason in itself."

Benedict XVI

"The universe is not the product of darkness and unreason; it comes from intelligence, freedom, and from the beauty that is identical with love"

Benedict XVI

"We are not some casual and meaningless product of evolution. Each of us is the result of a thought of God."

Benedict XVI

"Atheism is a disease of the soul before it becomes an error of understanding."

Plato

"Atheism is so senseless and odious to mankind that it never had many professors"

Isaac Newton

"I'm not an atheist, and I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God."Albert Einstein

"Egnorance: The Egotistical Combination of Ignorance and Arrogance" Burt Humburg

"Egnor [is] an interesting example of the religious pathology that's going to be afflicting us for probably the next century..." P.Z. Myers

"...so far Dr.Egnor seems not to grasp the folly of his situation." Steven Novella

"Michael Egnor is giving every sign of continuing the shenanigans that has already made him infamous in skeptical circles." Steven Novella

"Dr. Egnor has his own blog now. Hilarity ensues..."Orac

"Egnor probably always was an arrogant asshole, also when he was an athiest. Then he had a midlife crisis, found religion and he became an even bigger asshole."

Troy

"...it is simply impossible for me to continue to believe that the "Michael Egnor" articles are being written by a real person who really believes what he (or she) writes." Mike Dunford

"Michael Egnor comes back for another helping of whup ass..." P.Z. Myers

"Dr. Egnor's deviously clever plan to destroy Darwinism once and for all..." Orac

"Dr. Egnor regularly laid down flaming swaths of stupid ..." Orac

"...Dr. Egnor reaches a new low..." Mark C. Chu-Carroll

"Egnor's machine is uninhabited by any ghost..." P.Z. MyersSuddenly [Egnor] knows law better than lawyers, he knows biology better than biologists, he pretends to know everything better than people who have actually studied whatever it is that Egnor feels threatens his crazy religion. Troy

"This is not an excuse for Dr. Egnor's ignorance – he threw his hat into the ring, he deserves what he gets. He should have had the proper humility to stay out..."Steven Novella

"...that paragon of arrogant ignorance, Dr. Michael Egnor, is back at it again..." Mark C. Chu-Carroll

"...Michael Egnor just can't get enough of making himself look like an idiot..." Mark C. Chu-Carroll

"Dr. Michael Egnor: Neurosurgeon, Stony Brook Faculty, and all around Dishonest Twit...based on the level of intellectual integrity that he just demonstrated, he's not someone I would trust to train a dog, much less a doctor" Mike Dunford

"Two Things that Don't Go Together: Michael Egnor and Intellectual Integrity...Someone once pointed out that when a dog pisses on a fire hydrant, it's not committing an act of vandalism. It's just being a dog..." Mike Dunford