Hi all,
just a question - would it be better to test RC2 one week just
intern, before it is anounced on the website?
and then perhaps a bug page for RC2 in doc, just to avoid double posts
and answers in the forum?
I can test Geode, Via C3, Via Eden (Christophe did you change
something?), PII, PIII with intel grafic, Centrino with Radeon + Tridend
grafik, Athlon XP with NV7050
something else - the English Website http://www.slitaz.org/en still
links to http://www.slitaz.org/en/doc/ but it should be
http://doc.slitaz.org/en:start
Thomas
Am Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:54:08 +0100
schrieb Christophe Lincoln <pankso@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Hi Christophe,
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> > I was stupid - xorg-server-Xfbdev exists ....
>
> Nope you note stupide :-)
>
> xorg-server-Xfbdev = A TinyX autonomous server who need no driver and
> have small dependencies but limited feature (SliTaz 1.0, 2.0 was
> using A TinyX server called Xvesa in 3.0 we have a flavor of. But
> Xorg dropped it and since TinyX server Xfbdev work on any hardware
> wich support framebuffer)
>
> xorg-xf86-video-fbdev = The framebuffer driver for Xorg server wich I
> never tested and who is not yet in SliTaz. Guess it is a generic drive
> like the vesa one.
>
> > ciao
> >
> > Thomas
>
>
> - Christophe
>
--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/