101. Tribal Council Meeting - in Live Events Discussion [original thread]For myself, I am at a tossup as to whether or not the event was successful. God mode shield? I don't see a huge problem with that. There had to be some sort of gank potential in my opinion, but at the same time, I bring up an issue I bought for t...
- by Markus Reese - at 2013.02.14 20:46:00

104. Regarding Old Dev Actors - in Live Events Discussion [original thread]I would like to push for Haeldone to be ressurected. A major player and the most prominent empire supporter in the sansha wars with his nyx. I thought was a very important actor and would be nice to see more.
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.12.20 08:24:00

105. Sticky:Events overview: Feedback - in Live Events Discussion [original thread]Well here is something interesting. I missed these low security ones, but is it possible to align the agression of the NPCs with that of the actors? In previous events, the spawned npcs were always red. With the new mechanics, is it possible to re...
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.12.07 04:41:00

106. So that's what a victory in this game feels like! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]Very well written, and hopefully more have your experience. The ability to bring more pirate playstyle to eve, but at the same time bring more of the business side can only make for good things. Next step, more pirate content. AF and interceptor ...
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.12.07 04:34:00

107. Sticky:Events overview: Feedback - in Live Events Discussion [original thread] CCP Falcon wrote: Woo hoo, good stuff to hear All really great stuff to hear. The comment in the other thread about win some and lose some I am all for. When they upped the difficulty and AI in the NPCs in the july post incursion event, we w...
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.12.05 04:26:00

109. Sticky:Events overview: Feedback - in Live Events Discussion [original thread] CCP Eterne wrote: We honestly were expected to be hot dropped in that event and were surprised one never came. Every event we've run prior in that area has led to us being hot dropped. That is my current issue with how the new set of liv...
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.12.04 19:32:00

110. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Bad Messenger wrote: more than one bonus for different links is pretty much useless because you can use only one type of mindlink and mindlink is most important thing to get good bonuses. True. However in small gang where you might only have...
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.11.07 03:01:00

112. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Berendas wrote: For my part, the BC and BS changes look stellar and there isn't much I would have differently... Except for the changes to the Typhoon. I would hate to see the hyper-versatility it offers disappear. The Typhoon embodies what it ...
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.11.06 21:17:00

113. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Sethimothy wrote: Am I understanding this right, that if you have two separate racial cruisers to V, and you have Destroyers to V, you'll still need to train Destroyers a second time to be able to use that second race's destroyers (as in, you'l...
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.11.06 20:11:00

114. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]Excellent blog! Well written and many things that myself, as a command and ewar support specialist had been much longing for. In fact, the changing to remove field and fleet is even more exciting. That said, the purpose of comments is to provide s...
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.11.06 20:07:00

116. Revamp Cap xfers (removal of "zero point" energy) - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Altrue wrote: You already have solutions to counter spider-tanking fleets, without having to disturb the majority of logistics that are using them in modest fleet sizes. ECM Burst, ECM bomb, ECM, Cap warfare that breaks the cap chain... Of cou...
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.11.05 00:09:00

118. CCP Marketers. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]And on top of that, alot of the stuff just looks damn good. They don't even need to market it under the eve name. People would by it just because it is stylish.
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.11.05 00:00:00

119. Supercaps, reduce tank, but reduce cost to match? - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]Another darn nerf supercaps thread, I know. But this is an idea kicking around in my head that I think could work. First, Kudos to the CFC, I concede that you guys control nullsec, this year has proved that are uncontestable in the sov warfare. g...
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.11.04 23:46:00

120. Revamp Cap xfers (removal of "zero point" energy) - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]Won't beat around the bush. This and one other posting I will have relate to the topic of capital warfare alot. Pretty much comes down to state of pvp. Small gang, not quite as big of deal, but the more logi, the more spider tank, the more this p...
- by Markus Reese - at 2012.11.04 23:33:00

COPYRIGHT NOTICEEVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.