Bugs item #1552616, was opened at 2006-09-05 12:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nelius_weiss
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1552616&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: calendar
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Alexei Larionov (alviz)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: Resources droped when add or delete a file link
Initial Comment:
All exept one of resources dropped when I add any file
as attachment to Calendar event.
I use last stable version from svn.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Cornelius Wei(nelius_weiss)
Date: 2006-09-15 21:40
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1035583
This bug is fixed in our subversion repository now.
You can update via subversion with the following commands:
cd /var/www/html/egroupware # replace with your eGW install dir
svn update *
To check if you have cvs availible (on most *nix system it's
installed by default), try:
svn --version
If that gives you a version-number, you have it installed. More
infos about subversion can be found in our wiki:
http://egroupware.org/wiki/subversion
There is no more delay between anonymous access to the repository
and developer access / commits.
If you can't / won't update via subversion: our next packages
will include this bugfix anyway.
Thank you for your bug report!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Alexei Larionov (alviz)
Date: 2006-09-11 07:16
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1563021
I have tested this bug on a eGW 1.2 demo site. It is appears
there. When I have booked any two or more resources any
adding or deleting links (files, links to calendar, infolog
etc.) dropping resources exept one (last addes?).
It is possible to press "Cancel" button for save work with
links (adding/deleting) and have all of resources have booked.
Please help. I cannot explain my managers this "feature".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1552616&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1556612, was opened at 2006-09-11 19:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1556612&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: felamimail
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: The Hwyman (hwyman)
Assigned to: Lars Kneschke (lkneschke)
Summary: Incorrect FeLaMiMail Quota Display
Initial Comment:
I'm having a problem with the quota display. Our email
quota limit is set to 100M (102400000 bytes) in
Postfix (our MTA). The quota display in FeLaMiMail is
showing the quota limit to be 97M. I know Postfix
starts bouncing emails when the 100M limit is reached,
so I was concerned there might be a problem with our
Courier-IMAP server. I used telnet to login to the
IMAP server using my account and issued the
GETQUOTAROOT command. The server responded with the
following:
QUOTA "ROOT" (STORAGE 48688 100000)
The first number is the current size of the mailbox
(in Kb) and the second is the quota limit (represented
by number of units of 1024 octets as required by
RFC2087). FeLaMiMail displays 47M / 97M. Obviously the
current size of the mailbox is also wrong in
FeLaMiMail. I suspect what is happening is that
Felamimail is treating the "quota" (the second number
that is returned by the GETQUOTAROOT) as a size
instead of a quantity. In my case, it is reporting a
quantity of 100000 units of 1024 octets. 100000 *
1024 = 102400000. It looks like both the current size
and quota are being divided by 1024 to calculate the
current number of megs that are displayed by the quota
display. Only the current size needs to be divided by
1024. The quota has to be divided by 1000.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1556612&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1552616, was opened at 2006-09-05 16:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by alviz
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1552616&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: calendar
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 7
Submitted By: Alexei Larionov (alviz)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: Resources droped when add or delete a file link
Initial Comment:
All exept one of resources dropped when I add any file
as attachment to Calendar event.
I use last stable version from svn.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Alexei Larionov (alviz)
Date: 2006-09-11 11:16
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1563021
I have tested this bug on a eGW 1.2 demo site. It is appears
there. When I have booked any two or more resources any
adding or deleting links (files, links to calendar, infolog
etc.) dropping resources exept one (last addes?).
It is possible to press "Cancel" button for save work with
links (adding/deleting) and have all of resources have booked.
Please help. I cannot explain my managers this "feature".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1552616&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1554677, was opened at 2006-09-08 13:26
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1554677&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: sitemgr
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Patriator (patriator)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: Trouble when adding a link
Initial Comment:
Hi,
Meet some trouble in the site manager.
It occurs when I insert a link in a html element and
when the link url match '*script*'.
Discovered it when I tried to make a link to a
suscription page.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1554677&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1554611, was opened at 2006-09-08 11:01
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1554611&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: felamimail
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexandros Gougousoudis (mrdros)
Assigned to: Lars Kneschke (lkneschke)
Summary: FL doesn't honour mail profiles made with EmailAdmin
Initial Comment:
If more than one mailprofiles are setup with
EmailAdmin, FelamiMail takes the first one. It doesn't
matter what is written in the personal settings. As a
workaround I use now the other Email-App.
Please fix this ASAP, because it's a real blocker if
more than one imap-server have to be served.
Thanks
Alex
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1554611&group_id=78745

Feature Requests item #1554461, was opened at 2006-09-07 22:39
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554341&aid=1554461&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: ProjectManager
Group: Next Release (example)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adriano Vieira (harpiain) (harpiain)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: eGW applications x MyDMS
Initial Comment:
I'll post this feature request as "ProjectManager", but
it could be extensible to all other applications (e.g.
infolog, knowledgebase, tracker etc).
Every application would be allowed to create a link to
MyDMS as an element.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554341&aid=1554461&group_id=78745

Feature Requests item #1554339, was opened at 2006-09-07 17:22
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554341&aid=1554339&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: ProjectManager
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adriano Vieira (harpiain) (harpiain)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: PM-Templates x applications templates
Initial Comment:
You've added the template resource on ProjectManager
and it's a great feature on it, congratulations.
On the other hand, as you know, the PM-Template could
have a lot of elements. Thence I hope all of those PM
elemeents could have templates, too.
I mean that if I create a PM-Template and its elements
(e.g: calendar, infolog) the elements items are real
and active elements and all users can register
something else on those "elements templates".
eGw system could has the application (e.g. calendar,
infolog) template concept/feature, too.
Thx a lot in advance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554341&aid=1554339&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1554331, was opened at 2006-09-07 17:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1554331&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: ProjectManager
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adriano Vieira (harpiain) (harpiain)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: PM-Templates x applications links
Initial Comment:
When I create a new item on anyone application. Thence
I've choose the link "tag" to select a project to link
with. After choosing "PM"->Search all projects are
showed there (PM-Templates).
It is wrong, isn't it? eGw system should suppress those
registred PM-Templates, doesn't it?
I hope only Active Project should be showed/viewed on
that application tag "link" selection.
Thx
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1554331&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1473167, was opened at 2006-04-19 20:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jumo
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1473167&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: wiki
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
>Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: JM (jumo)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: wiki works only for anonymous users
Initial Comment:
The Wiki works only for anonymous users, you can see it
in the Demo-Version of eGroupware as well. A
http://egroupware.org/egroupware/wiki/index.php
(without a login) works but when you login all you get
is a "Page not found" when you try to access the
Wiki-Pages.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: JM (jumo)
Date: 2006-09-07 17:23
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=260781
Nope, it's a bug in eGroupware. Either in the conversion
from an "old" to a "new" version or maybe a bug in the "new"
version of egroupware.
The "problem" is that I used group rights in the wiki and
for example the old group number was "8" (field writable and
readable) but with the new egroupware the same group has the
id "-8" (negative 8) but in the tables (wiki) of the new
egroupware the "8" (positive 8) is still there in the fields
wiki_writable and wiki_readable and so the wiki can't find
the pages because the group rights are wrong... I must edit
it manually in the DB or I must change the the group to
everybody (Zero, 0) because 0 is still 0 in the new
egroupware version :-).
I don't know if this is a conversion bug... is it correct
that the group id in the new egroupware version are now negativ?
Btw. this bug still exists in the 1.2.105 version...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Date: 2006-08-13 11:12
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=208526
Hi,
I believe you problem was caused by a not working install in
early 1.2 versions.
Please update to 1.2.104, uninstall the wiki and reinstall it.
Ralf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1473167&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1554078, was opened at 2006-09-07 07:53
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1554078&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: calendar
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Russ Wright (webruss)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: Birthdays run off page
Initial Comment:
I have a large database of contacts and when I turn on
the "Show birthdays on home page" function they do not
wrap but instead run off the page in one long line.
I've attached a screenshot.
Regards
Russ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1554078&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1553977, was opened at 2006-09-07 10:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by suizit
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1553977&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: addressbook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: cine (suizit)
Assigned to: Miles Lott (milosch)
Summary: There is a bug with LDAP and multiple categories
Initial Comment:
I have found a bug with multiple categories in
class.contacts_ldap.inc.php near line 1030 in every
1.2.x release.
There is a if() condition which checks the difference
between $ldap_fields and $stock_fields but there is
logical failure:
$ldap_fields[0][$fvalue][0] has only the 1st entry of
an array like phpgwContactCatId. So if I have 2
categories set in the addressbook entry and I delete
the second one, it will not modify the real ldap entry.
Additionally if I apply in stead of save the entry, the
addressbook will not display the deleted second
category. Closing the window and reopening it again
will show both categories again including the second
one which should be deleted.
I have wrote a small work-around for this which moves
the category array one step further to not interrupt
with the rest of the $ldap_fields & stock_fields:
<pre>
[...]
unset($allfields['lid']);
foreach($allfields as $fname => $fvalue){
if($fname=="cat_id") {
// Fix ldap category array
$cat_id_temp = $ldap_fields[0][$fvalue];
unset($cat_id_temp['count']);
unset($ldap_fields[0][$fvalue]);
$ldap_fields[0][$fvalue][0] = $cat_id_temp;
}
if($ldap_fields[0][$fvalue] && $stock_fields[$fname] &&
$ldap_fields[0][$fvalue][0] != $stock_fields[$fname] ){
[...]
</pre>
Thanks for your time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: cine (suizit)
Date: 2006-09-07 10:44
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1592609
This should be more correct than the last code fragment.
<pre>
[...]
unset($allfields['lid']);
foreach($allfields as $fname => $fvalue){
if($fname=="cat_id" && $ldap_fields[0][$fvalue]['count'] > 1) {
// Fix ldap category array
$cat_id_temp = $ldap_fields[0][$fvalue];
unset($cat_id_temp['count']);
unset($ldap_fields[0][$fvalue]);
$ldap_fields[0][$fvalue][0] = $cat_id_temp;
}
if($ldap_fields[0][$fvalue] && $stock_fields[$fname] &&
$ldap_fields[0][$fvalue][0] != $stock_fields[$fname] ){
[...]
</pre>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1553977&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1553977, was opened at 2006-09-07 10:02
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1553977&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: addressbook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: cine (suizit)
Assigned to: Miles Lott (milosch)
Summary: There is a bug with LDAP and multiple categories
Initial Comment:
I have found a bug with multiple categories in
class.contacts_ldap.inc.php near line 1030 in every
1.2.x release.
There is a if() condition which checks the difference
between $ldap_fields and $stock_fields but there is
logical failure:
$ldap_fields[0][$fvalue][0] has only the 1st entry of
an array like phpgwContactCatId. So if I have 2
categories set in the addressbook entry and I delete
the second one, it will not modify the real ldap entry.
Additionally if I apply in stead of save the entry, the
addressbook will not display the deleted second
category. Closing the window and reopening it again
will show both categories again including the second
one which should be deleted.
I have wrote a small work-around for this which moves
the category array one step further to not interrupt
with the rest of the $ldap_fields & stock_fields:
<pre>
[...]
unset($allfields['lid']);
foreach($allfields as $fname => $fvalue){
if($fname=="cat_id") {
// Fix ldap category array
$cat_id_temp = $ldap_fields[0][$fvalue];
unset($cat_id_temp['count']);
unset($ldap_fields[0][$fvalue]);
$ldap_fields[0][$fvalue][0] = $cat_id_temp;
}
if($ldap_fields[0][$fvalue] && $stock_fields[$fname] &&
$ldap_fields[0][$fvalue][0] != $stock_fields[$fname] ){
[...]
</pre>
Thanks for your time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1553977&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1553975, was opened at 2006-09-07 12:01
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1553975&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: knowledge base
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: franjb68 (franjb68)
Assigned to: Alejandro Pedraza (alpeb)
Summary: Weird results looking in the KB
Initial Comment:
When looking for some strings in the knowledge base it
shows weird results.
Example:
On http://www.egroupware.org/knowledge_base, if you
search for 'database' (without comiles) you obtain the
following:
Search results
showing 10
If you count, there are just 7. And the articles 4 and
9 appear twice.
This also happens on
http://demo.egroupware.org:8080/1.2/login.php,
searching for 'Mac' in the KB. It says 'showing 3',
but just shows the article 163 twice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1553975&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1553968, was opened at 2006-09-07 11:44
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by franjb68
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1553968&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: knowledge base
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: franjb68 (franjb68)
>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Weird results looking in the KB
Initial Comment:
When looking for some strings in the knowledge base it
shows weird results.
Example:
On http://www.egroupware.org/knowledge_base, if you
search for 'database' (without comiles) you obtain the
following:
Search results
showing 10
If you count, there are just 7. And the articles 4 and
9 appear twice.
This also happens on
http://demo.egroupware.org:8080/1.2/login.php,
searching for 'Mac' in the KB. It says 'showing 3',
but just shows the article 163 twice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1553968&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1553968, was opened at 2006-09-07 11:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1553968&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: knowledge base
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: franjb68 (franjb68)
Assigned to: Alejandro Pedraza (alpeb)
Summary: Weird results looking in the KB
Initial Comment:
When looking for some strings in the knowledge base it
shows weird results.
Example:
On http://www.egroupware.org/knowledge_base, if you
search for 'database' (without comiles) you obtain the
following:
Search results
showing 10
If you count, there are just 7. And the articles 4 and
9 appear twice.
This also happens on
http://demo.egroupware.org:8080/1.2/login.php,
searching for 'Mac' in the KB. It says 'showing 3',
but just shows the article 163 twice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1553968&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1449789, was opened at 2006-03-14 19:15
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by franjb68
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1449789&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: knowledge base
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 4
Submitted By: charlie (kve)
Assigned to: Lars Kneschke (lkneschke)
Summary: Knowledge Base Advanced Search keywords block eachother
Initial Comment:
Hi.
We wanted to assign to every article in the
knowledgebase couple of new tokens, like "priority"
"phase" "type" - but we didn't want to hack the code or
touch the database scheme, so we went for the keywords.
You can add several keywords to an article, but if you
add two, like "Priority1" and "Phase1", and you search
in the advanced search after these two, you will find
no articles, even though there is one with the given
keywords.
The problem, as we see, lies in the sql queries, where
one column will be proved for "...LIKE %Priority1%..."
and the same time it will be proved again for "...LIKE
%Phase1%...". The problem lies in the connecting "AND"
which should be basically an "OR", since the column
only contain one word, and so it cannot fulfill both
requirements.
an example:
Here we see how the structure is built:
mysql> select phpgw_kb_articles.art_id , title , topic
, keyword from phpgw_kb_articles JOIN phpgw_kb_search
ON phpgw_kb_articles.art_id=phpgw_kb_search.art_id ;
+--------+--------------------+------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
| art_id | title | topic
| keyword |
+--------+--------------------+------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
| 2 | ESEO | European Earth Orbiter
| |
| 4 | SSETI Organization | SSETI Organization
| |
| 1 | About SSETI | Short summary and fact
sheet about the SSETI Project | about |
| 2 | ESEO | European Earth Orbiter
| Earth |
| 2 | ESEO | European Earth Orbiter
| European |
| 3 | ESMO | European Students Moon
Orbiter | European |
| 3 | ESMO | European Students Moon
Orbiter | Moon |
| 2 | ESEO | European Earth Orbiter
| Orbiter |
| 3 | ESMO | European Students Moon
Orbiter | Orbiter |
| 6 | test | EPs Fehler
| Phase1 |
| 7 | test2 | Error in the EPS system
| Phase7 |
| 5 | Test Title | Test Topic
| please |
| 6 | test | EPs Fehler
| Priority1 |
| 7 | test2 | Error in the EPS system
| Priority1 |
| 1 | About SSETI | Short summary and fact
sheet about the SSETI Project | sseti |
| 3 | ESMO | European Students Moon
Orbiter | Students |
| 1 | About SSETI | Short summary and fact
sheet about the SSETI Project | summary |
| 6 | test | EPs Fehler
| Type1 |
| 7 | test2 | Error in the EPS system
| Type2 |
| 5 | Test Title | Test Topic
| Yes |
+--------+--------------------+------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
20 rows in set (0.02 sec)
here it is hwo egw queries:
mysql> SELECT DISTINCT phpgw_kb_articles.art_id , title
, topic , text , keyword FROM phpgw_kb_articles LEFT
JOIN phpgw_kb_search ON
phpgw_kb_articles.art_id=phpgw_kb_search.art_id WHERE
user_id IN (10, -16, 10, 13, 14, 17, -12, 11, 21, -5,
20, 0) AND (title LIKE '%Priority1%' OR topic LIKE
'%Priority1%' OR keyword LIKE '%Priority1%' OR text
LIKE '%Priority1%') and (title LIKE '%Phase1%' OR topic
LIKE '%Phase1%' OR keyword LIKE '%Phase1%' OR text LIKE
'%Phase1%');
Empty set (0.01 sec)
mysql>
Here it is with OR instead of AND for the search:
mysql> SELECT DISTINCT phpgw_kb_articles.art_id , title
, topic , text , keyword FROM phpgw_kb_articles LEFT
JOIN phpgw_kb_search ON
phpgw_kb_articles.art_id=phpgw_kb_search.art_id WHERE
user_id IN (10, -16, 10, 13, 14, 17, -12, 11, 21, -5,
20, 0) AND (title LIKE '%Priority1%' OR topic LIKE
'%Priority1%' OR keyword LIKE '%Priority1%' OR text
LIKE '%Priority1%') OR (title LIKE '%Phase1%' OR topic
LIKE '%Phase1%' OR keyword LIKE '%Phase1%' OR text LIKE
'%Phase1%');
+--------+-------+-------------------------+------------------------------+-----------+
| art_id | title | topic | text
| keyword |
+--------+-------+-------------------------+------------------------------+-----------+
| 6 | test | EPs Fehler | this is
just a test<br /> | Phase1 |
| 6 | test | EPs Fehler | this is
just a test<br /> | Priority1 |
| 7 | test2 | Error in the EPS system | Shunt
resistor burned<br /> | Priority1 |
+--------+-------+-------------------------+------------------------------+-----------+
3 rows in set (0.01 sec)
mysql>
of course here every art_id should be uniq in the
table, so we added a "group by art_id":
mysql> SELECT DISTINCT phpgw_kb_articles.art_id ,
title , topic , text , keyword FROM phpgw_kb_articles
LEFT JOIN phpgw_kb_search ON
phpgw_kb_articles.art_id=phpgw_kb_search.art_id WHERE
user_id IN (10, -16, 10, 13, 14, 17, -12, 11, 21, -5,
20, 0) AND (title LIKE '%Priority1%' OR topic LIKE
'%Priority1%' OR keyword LIKE '%Priority1%' OR text
LIKE '%Priority1%') OR (title LIKE '%Phase1%' OR topic
LIKE '%Phase1%' OR keyword LIKE '%Phase1%' OR text LIKE
'%Phase1%') group by art_id ;
+--------+-------+-------------------------+------------------------------+-----------+
| art_id | title | topic | text
| keyword |
+--------+-------+-------------------------+------------------------------+-----------+
| 6 | test | EPs Fehler | this is
just a test<br /> | Phase1 |
| 7 | test2 | Error in the EPS system | Shunt
resistor burned<br /> | Priority1 |
+--------+-------+-------------------------+------------------------------+-----------+
2 rows in set (0.01 sec)
mysql>
so both articles will be found/shown.
feel free to contact me for other tests/information
under: karoly.vegh@...
HTH
charlie
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: franjb68 (franjb68)
Date: 2006-09-07 11:41
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1134235
I don't know if this is the same problem, but when looking
for some strings on the knowledge base it shows weird results.
Example:
On http://www.egroupware.org/knowledge_base, if you search
for 'database' (without comiles) you obtain the following:
Search results
showing 10
If you count, there are just 7. And the articles 4 and 9
appear twice.
This also happens on
http://demo.egroupware.org:8080/1.2/login.php, searching for
'Mac' in the KB. It says 'showing 3', but just shows the
article 163 twice.
Just in case I'll open a new bug with this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1449789&group_id=78745

Feature Requests item #1553951, was opened at 2006-09-07 11:19
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554341&aid=1553951&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: addressbook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: fide rallalla (fiderallalla)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: asterisk click2dial
Initial Comment:
In Infolog, Addressbook and elsewhere clicking on a
phone# could open a popup which enables to choose the
extension where the connection should be established
to. Herewith asterisk gets a call-file placed with the
right data in its spool-dir and does the calling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554341&aid=1553951&group_id=78745

Feature Requests item #1553949, was opened at 2006-09-07 11:18
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554341&aid=1553949&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: addressbook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: fide rallalla (fiderallalla)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: company / organization fields in contact data mask
Initial Comment:
We have many (ours too) companys whose name is more
than one line, sometimes up to three lines(!). It would
be greate to have more fields for the company's title.
Or, better, a flexible field handling with
user-defining of the fields. The current user-defined
fields are not the solution for that problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554341&aid=1553949&group_id=78745

Feature Requests item #1553948, was opened at 2006-09-07 11:17
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554341&aid=1553948&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: addressbook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: fide rallalla (fiderallalla)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: organization data management / personal relation inheritance
Initial Comment:
We have to manage several companys in the addressbook,
each with several persons. It would be great to be able
to add a company contact and then add its users who can
inherit the company's contact data.
Currently we have to add the first person with the
company-data and then view that contact, copy it and
save it as an other contact which may be tricki when
you have many persons, related to an organization.
Maybe we could do it if there'd be a possibility of a
checkbox in the Relations Tab to check 'inherit Company
data' from that related contact. Or, in the personal
data tab, getting a selectbox from where to get the
company data.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554341&aid=1553948&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1544007, was opened at 2006-08-21 08:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1544007&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: wiki
Group: 1.2 final, no more RC1-8 please !!!
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: florian (flokro)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: language change: broken links
Initial Comment:
wikis created in german are not usable if logged in an english account
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot)
Date: 2006-09-06 19:20
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1312539
This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Date: 2006-08-23 10:03
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=208526
Hi,
if you dont need translations and just want one wiki for all
users regardless of the language, just leave the language
empty or use english, which is the fallback language for all
pages not existing in the native language.
If you want eg. German as the fallback language, you can
only change that in the code (wiki/inc/class.sowiki.inc.php)
at the moment.
Ralf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: florian (flokro)
Date: 2006-08-23 08:21
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1580540
I expected to have the same wiki regardless the used
language. And thats what we need for our multilingual
group. For us it is not possible to translate every page.
It is possible to create an link to the other wiki using:
<a
href="/index.php?menuaction=wiki.uiwiki.view&page=eGroupWare&lang=en"
target="_self">englisches Wiki</a>
but every further link is broken (is a link to create a new
page)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Date: 2006-08-22 09:35
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=208526
Hi,
what did you expect?
Ralf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1544007&group_id=78745

Bugs item #1460101, was opened at 2006-03-28 17:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mr1
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1460101&group_id=78745
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: calendar
Group: SVN trunk / development branch
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Finjon Kiang (kiang)
Assigned to: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Summary: small bug in jscalendar
Initial Comment:
One user found that once he set Sunday as the first day
in preference, the week(wk) number in jscalendar would
have a small problem.
It's Sunday at 1-1-2006, and it should be the first
week in 2006. But jscalendar showed that it's 52th week
in 2005.
Have a look at following picture:
http://twpug.net/uploads/newbb/4911_4428b7783b600.gif
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Martin (mr1)
Date: 2006-09-06 14:40
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1591851
Actually, since the ISO standard assumes that the week
starts on Monday this may be a bug after all. My previous
comment stated that the week number is correct for the date
specified. But the week numbers in the original example are
all off by one (according to the standard) if they are
taken to refer to the bulk of the days (Mon-Sat).
The ISO-correct way would be to number the weeks in the
example 52/1, 1/2, 2/3 etc with the first number referring
only to the Sunday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Martin (mr1)
Date: 2006-09-06 14:04
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1591851
According to the ISO 8601 standard the current behaviour of
jscalendar is correct. Apparently there is also a US
standard that says otherwise, but it is not widely used.
>From http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html
Week 01 of a year is per definition the first week that has
the Thursday in this year, which is equivalent to the week
that contains the fourth day of January. In other words,
the first week of a new year is the week that has the
majority of its days in the new year. Week 01 might also
contain days from the previous year and the week before
week 01 of a year is the last week (52 or 53) of the
previous year even if it contains days from the new year. A
week starts with Monday (day 1) and ends with Sunday (day
7).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Ralf Becker (ralfbecker)
Date: 2006-08-13 10:36
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=208526
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=554338&aid=1460101&group_id=78745