<quoted text><quoted text>Critiquing typos is what people usually do when they can't muster a legitimate response on the issues.Are you here to debate issues or is pointing out typos all you're capable of?

Did you fail to read his post? He presented no issue that warranted mustering a legitimate response.

His entire post was a condemnation of others as stupid, moronic, etc. while appearing so himself. Consequently, his typos are too rich to pass up.

<quoted text>//////////When facts are shown that cannot be disputed you do not reply, disappear, switch topics or you resort to name-calling.Dan the Man, you are a cowardly piece of COMMUNIST shit!Just like your COMMUNIST black messiah!

The "communist black messiah" (Personally, I refer to him as the President of the United States) was voted in for a second term..so hes' everybodys' "black messiah" (President), not just Dan the Man's.

Almost laughable how your comment accuses one person of resorting to name-calling and then you follow suit.

Dumb ass racial hating taxi, have you forgotten that president obama will never be be your president or any tea bags president? you can at least flip flop as good as the governor etch a sketch, but nothing else. The tea bags need your special kind of ignorant cheap entertainment so don't let them down. Is that governor Gerry Brown pissing you off? you should be, but you can only make complaint, wah wah wah wah

<quoted text>Did you fail to read his post? He presented no issue that warranted mustering a legitimate response.His entire post was a condemnation of others as stupid, moronic, etc. while appearing so himself. Consequently, his typos are too rich to pass up.He certainly is not here to "debate issues".Like yours, his comments inevitably decay into name calling.

I'm trying to find a post from you that isn't just mocking someone's typos.

I haven't found one yet. I guess that tells us your intention here. Too bad you aren't up to engaging in legitimate debate.

<quoted text>I'm trying to find a post from you that isn't just mocking someone's typos.I haven't found one yet. I guess that tells us your intention here. Too bad you aren't up to engaging in legitimate debate.

Your thrill on this forum is name calling and verbally abusing others while hiding behind the term 'debate.'

The spelling dunce should stop mocking the stupidity of others while appearing so stupid.

<quoted text>Your thrill on this forum is name calling and verbally abusing others while hiding behind the term 'debate.'The spelling dunce should stop mocking the stupidity of others while appearing so stupid.Your criticism of me is no different than mine of him.

Maybe you're new here. Let me clue you in - I never call anyone names until they call me names. I never verbally abuse others until they make the decision that's how they want to play it. If you want to criticize me, find something legitimate to criticize me for.

<quoted text>Maybe you're new here. Let me clue you in - I never call anyone names until they call me names. I never verbally abuse others until they make the decision that's how they want to play it. If you want to criticize me, find something legitimate to criticize me for.

You forgot to mention that when the name calling isn't going on you will insult the posters thoughts or beliefs in a sly way to where he may call you a name..........then watch out, your ready to bash the poster.

<quoted text> You forgot to mention that when the name calling isn't going on you will insult the posters thoughts or beliefs in a sly way to where he may call you a name..........then watch out, your ready to bash the poster.You are an asshole and I'm not alone with that opinion.

Ummm, that's what debate is - criticizing other people's opinions.

Someone states expresses an opinion or belief. Someone else criticizes it and states a differing opinion. The first person criticizes that and expresses another thought or belief. That's how debate goes.

But you can't tell the difference, can you? Someone criticizes your opinion, and you respond with personal attacks and name-calling. Don't blame me for that - it isn't my fault that you're too emotionally immature to have honest debate.

<quoted text>Ummm, that's what debate is - criticizing other people's opinions.Someone states expresses an opinion or belief. Someone else criticizes it and states a differing opinion. The first person criticizes that and expresses another thought or belief. That's how debate goes.But you can't tell the difference, can you? Someone criticizes your opinion, and you respond with personal attacks and name-calling. Don't blame me for that - it isn't my fault that you're too emotionally immature to have honest debate.

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.