Have Republicrat Candidates begun the process of actually taking down the media, or are they just making temporary political points?

I didn't watch the debates the other night; I was too tired. So I listened carefully to, most especially, what Rush had to say, and also Glenn and Sean, as I was driving and working the next day. And it sounds like the Media was the loser, rather than any candidates or Parties. It could be the beginning of the end of the ideologically Marxist dominated Mainstream Media, or it could be a mere political bone-toss to gain votes. Time will tell. But the tight linkage between the Marxocrat Party and the Marxist Media was made publicly clear. Finally.

Chapter 9 of Culture=Religion+Politics is devoted to how "Frankfurt School" Marxism infected and eventually dominated American education, most especially Journalism education, and thereby became a double-whammy revolutionary tool against American Constitutionalism. Children were indoctrinated with it in formal education, and all citizens were propagandized with it in their daily news reporting. Over time, over multiple generations, most American citizens would have an unwarranted negative view of Capitalism and an unwarranted positive view of Socialism.

Chapter 7 was devoted to the Parties, and especially how the Democrat Party metamorphosed from the Slavery Party to the Secession Party to the Segregation Party to the Marxocrat Party of today. It was anti-American from its birth. The Confederate flag was and is the flag of their Party; the KKK was born of and is a branch of their Party.

And today, the Marxocrat Party and the News Media are so tightly bound in their overall anti-American Marxist ideology, and in their ownership by the same super-rich, Crony-Capitalist, donor-class "Club" that it is difficult to tell whether the Media owns the Party or the Party owns the Media.

Well, in this last debate, it seems that the Republicrat candidates radically took over control of the "show" that political debates have become. And, with Cruz in the lead, they delivered a public whipping to the Marxist sophists who were supposed to be publicly picking them all apart and destroying them in the public eye, according to the usual Media plan.

Good.

But don't expect the Moron Vote or the Dependent Vote or the fraudulent Non-Citizen Vote or the gigantic exponentially growing Government Employee Vote to be affected at all. The Marxocrat Party will not lose it's base. And it will cheat at the polls. That's what it does.

Beginning on Page 220 of Culture=Religion+Politics we discussed how to dismantle the two Political Parties and the Party process itself. Then, on page 222, we began the discussion of how to take down the Media, reversing the government policies originated with Woodrow Wilson, and return "The Media" to a strictly private, highly competitive business opportunity, which is what it was supposed to be from the beginning. It was never supposed to be driving the American bus. It was never supposed to have any government authority over any part of the political process.

I'm not going to go over all those details here, but state that it can be done, thanks largely to alternative media, and especially the internet. I would just like to discuss here the possibility of a new form of debate, completely out of the hands of the media. All of their "questions" are merely political speeches anyway, at the very least.

Why should a political debate be a "show" modeled after entertainment shows? Why should there be a "moderator" who gets to interject any statement or opinion or loaded question, and affect the outcome?

Why should an audience even be present to respond with whoops and cheers, applause and whistles, or boos and thrown fruit. Audiences can be "picked", and so can moderators. Political Debates should be judged by candidate statements that stand or fall on their own, not by audience responses.

The internet being what it is, and tools like Skype and various on-line meeting programs being what they are, I see no reason that a number of candidates could not be in the same live on-line meeting with no live audience and no moderator. Nothing other than a set of rules and a time keeper.

At the beginning of every segment of the debate, candidates draw straws to see who goes first, second, etc. At each segment of the debate, a topic appears on the screen that everyone is watching, such as "ECONOMY", or, "NATIONAL SECURITY", or, "NATIONAL DEFENSE", or, "FOREIGN POLICY", etc.

Then, in the pre-drawn sequence, a prerecorded one or two minute video of each candidate's position on that topic would be played, one at a time. After the last prerecorded topical video was played, the candidates would, one at a time, be given one or two minutes to respond to all the videos that just played. At the end of the allotted time of speaking, a 30-second warning would flash, and at the end of that 30-seconds the speaking candidate's microphone would be shut down, and the next candidate in line would be switched on.

They might get perhaps one more go-around in the same manner, but then, the next major topic would appear on the screen, and they would begin anew on the new topic, in the same manner; prerecorded speeches first, then, discussion, one at a time.

All of these debates would then be available on-line for replay any time in streaming video, and in printable transcript. There would be little or no doubt about what any of them had said, and there would be no moderator or "referee" of any kind involved. It might not be perfect, but it might be a whole lot better than what we have now. A series of such debates might whittle the field down pretty quickly, to where only a very few candidates are involved in the final one(s).

It seems that the whole world, and the Marxocrat Party, and their News Media, is always down on the greedy Capitalism of the United States, and how she needs to move to a more "charitable" and "merciful" system, like Socialism. Right.

But what almost no one seems to recognize is that we are not a Capitalist nation at all. We are Socialist. At least we are far more Socialist than we are Free Market. We stopped being a free market Capitalist nation in the Woodrow Wilson political moment. When he got the 16th Amendment ratified establishing a graduated income tax, and when he got the 17th Amendment ratified reducing the Senate to just another populist political body, and when he signed the Federal Reserve Act establishing the FED, we stopped being Capitalist. And it's been downhill since then.

Every time anyone figures out a new way round the increasingly strangling regulations and taxes, the increasingly Marxist government invents new regulations and taxes to strangle that new business venue. Look around. We do not have a free market. Everything is regulated or controlled by government, not private enterprise.

Because of Crony Capitalism, in which big companies "compete" for market share not by excellence of product or service, but by political favor and regulations and taxes that benefit them and hurt competition, we lean more to the Fascist side of the Marxist coin than to the Communist side. What's the difference? They're both Marxist.

We were only a Capitalist nation until the Woodrow Wilson Moment; and we became so incredibly successful in that short time frame that we are still richer, as a people, than most of the world.

But, just give Comrade Obama, peace be upon him, another minute or two.

=====

Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click a footnote link to see the gory details.)

Comments

Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to just stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our high Roman Catholic and Constitutional American standards of Truth, logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, obscene, blindly & doggedly anti-Catholic, anti-American, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, be prepared to back it up, keep it clean, keep it civil, and it will be published. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the Hard Left is what it always was, the New Leftist Liberals are what they are, and the Internet is what it is.

"Clickbait" advertising links are not acceptable for posting here.

If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information. Elitist Culturally Marxist Pure Authoritarians cannot and will not tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their rigid authoritarian, anti-equality, anti-life, anti-liberty, anti-property, hedonistic, anti-Constitution, pro-Marxist, pro-Islam, anti-Catholic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, anti-male, sexist, pro-homosexual, anti-heterosexual, anti-white, racist, anti-Western, anti-American, Globalist, anti-Nation, blatantly immoral, totally intolerant and bigoted point of view.

This Form cannot be submitted until the missing fields (labelled below in red) have been filled in

ADD COMMENT

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Silence in the face of evil is speaking. "We've had enough of exhortations to be silent!
Cry out with a hundred thousand tongues. I see that the world is rotten
because of silence." Saint Catherine of Siena

“An
error which is not resisted is approved; a truth which is not defended is
suppressed…. He who does not oppose an evident crime is open to the suspicion of
secret complicity.” – Pope Felix III

“Do not forget your purpose and destiny as God's creatures.
What you are in God's sight is what you are and nothing more”—Justice Clarence Thomas

"Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, then, is the sin committed by the person who claims to have a 'right' to persist in evil-in any sin at all-and who thus rejects redemption." Pope Saint John Paul the GreatDOMINUM ET VIVIFICANTEM

"Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it, and, indeed, to neglect to confound evil men-when we can do it-is no less a sin than to encourage them." Pope St. Felix III

If a purposeful violator of the Constitution who is a sworn officer of the governemt is not a domestic enemy of America and a traitor, then
there is no such thing, and the Constitution itself is without meaning,
and America has lost its grounding and its very purpose for being. Anti-American-Court

Live Interviews

"All the evils of the world are due to lukewarm Catholics." Pope Pius V

"All the strength of Satan's reign is due to the easygoing weakness of Catholics." Pope St. Pius X

Click the image above topublish your essay or article here,to be included among those below.

Submitted Articles andReprinted Articles

(Note: copyrights on these articles wherever present will supersede the WebSite copyright at the bottom footer of every WebPage)

Still Time To Get It Right. “Once you understand the role of energy in everything, you can begin to appreciate why there's simply nothing more important to get right. Energy is at the root of everything. If you have sufficient energy, anything is possible. But without it, everything grinds to a halt.” Chris Martenson

The Heresy of Chrislam. Those claiming that the “Allah” of Islam’s Qu’ran and Yahweh or God of both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible are one and the same are missing one glaring point: GOD NEVER CONTRADICTS HIMSELF.

Never be lukewarm.Life itself demands passion.He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input. Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.

NewsletterCatholic American ThinkerFree E-zine Subscription

Email

You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you theCatholic American ThinkerNewsletterand absolutely nothing else.

The
Purpose of this grouping of articles is to highlight the three incompatible geopolitical movements in global contention: American Constitutionalism, Marxism and Islam. And to give evidence to the insidious infiltration of Marxist and Islamic thought, and corrosive evil, into American Culture.

Culture=Religion+PoliticsA fixed social moral code, born of religion, is what makes a unique, identifiable People, distinct from other Peoples. Distinct People of a common moral code make civil laws representing and reinforcing their common moral code, via Politics. When a distinctly moral People live within a distinct Political organization they form a distinct and identifiable Human Culture.

"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII

"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi

Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance
may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston
Churchill

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who
deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand

Atheist Genesis:

In the beginning there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing.
And then nothing accidentally exploded and created everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally encountered other bits of everything and formed some new kinds of everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into self-replicating bits of everything.
And then some self-replicating bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into dinosaurs.
See?

“ … for I have sworn upon
the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind
of man.” wrote Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush in
the year of our Lord 1800. The context
involved resistance to any form of Christianity or Deism legally imposing
itself throughout the USA. We must wonder what he might say
about our current government's forced imposition of strict secularism – i.e.,
anti-theism – throughout the USA. I submit that legally enforced secularism of society, like theocracy, like Marxism,
and like Islam, is, precisely, a form of tyranny over the mind of man.Nothing good can come from the religious cleansing of Judaeo-Christian society. Government imposed secularism is just another form of theocracy.