Few days ago, Union law minister, Kapil Sibal told to media that there are clinching evidence against Narendra Modi and Amit Shah in Isharat Jahan fake encounter case. That was the time when people started asking, why the clinching evidence is not yet presented and the so-called murder accused are roaming free.

Yesterday the CBI court gave clean chit to Amit Shah
in this fake encounter case citing no evidence (prosecutable). Where
has the clinching evidence of Union Law Minister gone? Doesn’t it
appear now that the Congress-led UPA was doing witch-haunting against
Narendra Modi and his aids!

In
Focus

Amit Shah on record said that there were around 1500
encounters that took in the entire country during his tenure as home
minister in Gujarat. The number encounters in Gujarat at that point
of time were only 15. All 15 encounters in Gujarat are subjected to
serious scrutiny where as rest of the encounters are not even
investigated barring one, the Batla house encounter.

I do agree that all encounters either genuine or
fake must be investigated. People involved in fake encounters must be
booked irrespective of the fact whether the encounters were against
criminals/terrorists! But investigating encounters selectively in one
state and try to drag political opponents is really a dangerous
issue! CBI is under the central government (Not to forget the caged
parrot term!). So, even if in such condition the CBI says that there
is lack of prosecutable evidence, then it must be considered that
both Modi and Shah were subjected to Congress’s vendetta politics!

Kapil Sibal lost his credibility, when he invented
zero loss theory on 2G scam. But in these encounter cases, everybody
has some doubt, that there might be something where both Shah and
Modi could be at fault! But today’s submission by the CBI now
clears the smoke and only exposes the Congress’s dirty tactic!

However, I would actually demand that all encounters
in every state must be investigated and if there are some fake
encounters, accused should be booked. In a democracy and in a
civilized country, fake encounters are in fact a horrible crime,
despite the victim being any alleged terrorist or a criminal.

There must be some decency and limit in politics.
You can’t have a vendetta politics at all. The Janata party during
1977-80 used vendetta politics against Indira Gandhi only to be
rejected by public in 1980.

Also Kapil Sibal needs to answer on his claim of
clinching evidence. He is a senior lawyer and must know, what
clinching evidence means. If he doesn’t able to answer, he must be
booked for defaming political opponents and misleading the country.