Canada is a safe society. Absent occasional spikes in specific crimes, it is generally getting safer, and has been for years. This is one of the best, and least understood, new stories in recent decades. Crime exists, and must be guarded against and fought. But we live in what is, by any historical standard, an astonishingly peaceful age.

There is a dark stain on Canada’s criminal justice track record, however. Crime, and more specifically incarceration rates, are much higher for aboriginal Canadians than the rest of the population. Aboriginal Canadians are locked up at a rate roughly six times the national rate. They make up approximately four per cent of the population, but are over 23 per cent of federal inmates. There is no real mystery as to why: many of Canada’s aboriginal communities suffer from precisely the kind of socio-economic blights — substance abuse, broken families, low education, unemployment — that any expert will point to as absolute red flags for crime. And this community dysfunction, unarguably, results largely from generations of failed, often racist, Canadian government policy.

Recent Canadian governments, left to clean up the injustice of earlier generations, have sought to improve this grim reality by a variety of means. One is the requirement that judges consider an offender’s aboriginal heritage, and the disadvantages it may have created, when imposing sentences. Another has been the creation of specialized incarceration facilities for aboriginals. These so-called “healing lodges” are minimum security prisons that, alongside traditional counselling and vocational training, offer aboriginal-specific cultural and spiritual education and therapy opportunities, in the hopes of rehabilitating aboriginal prisoners. It’s fair to ask whether special arrangements for natives doesn’t violate the principle that all prisoners should be treated the same, but that shouldn’t detract from the determination to pursue whatever measures provide the fairest and most effective means of addressing the problems of Canadian aboriginals.

Healing lodges are minimum security facilities. They are not designed or staffed for the kind of full-time, round-the-clock security that dangerous offenders require.

We don’t know if healing lodges work. Data is mixed — some studies show a steep drop in the rate of recidivism among convicts sent to healing lodges, others show that, if anything, recidivism rates for aboriginal prisoners are worse for those sent to healing lodges instead of the conventional correctional facilities. But the effort, at least, is worthwhile. If nothing else, it’s worth a shot.

But earnest efforts to do better can go too far. As reported by the Post’s Jen Gerson, a man with a long history of violent crime, including assault, forcible confinement and sexual assault, escaped earlier this month from a healing lodge in Alberta. Darrell Moosomin, a designated dangerous offender serving an indefinite sentence at the Pe Sakastew Centr was granted a release pass to attend a powwow with an aboriginal elder, but failed to return. He was located by police on Sunday, eight days after his escape, and is now back in custody.

Healing lodges are minimum security facilities. They are not designed or staffed for the kind of full-time, round-the-clock security that dangerous offenders require. Moosomin, a man that the courts have already found to pose such a significant threat to the public that he was ordered detained indefinitely, should have been treated with the security precautions due an offender of his nature. He had no business being housed in a minimum security facility, even one with the otherwise noble goal of providing an environment especially conducive to recovery.

Until we have sufficient evidence to declare, one way or the other, whether healing lodges are effective correctional tools, we should continue to experiment with them, and study the results. As years pass, we will presumably amass enough hard data to determine whether they make effective tools. In the meantime, the ongoing experiment in this form of justice should be limited to prisoners who can be properly and safely monitored in a minimum security environment. Any other decision is putting an admittedly noble goal ahead of a government’s most sacred duty — the protection of the public from danger.

It is also unfair to Canada’s aboriginals, especially those serving time in correctional facilities. Healing lodges may well provide a valuable service. They could prove to be an effective tool at rehabilitating members of a badly damaged community. Allowing dangerous offenders like Moosomin to escape from minimum security environments threatens public confidence in a program that, properly run, could prove helpful, even transformative. What a tragedy it would be to see avoidable mistakes doom a worthy experiment to early failure.

Almost Done!

Postmedia wants to improve your reading experience as well as share the best deals and promotions from our advertisers with you. The information below will be used to optimize the content and make ads across the network more relevant to you. You can always change the information you share with us by editing your profile.

By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.

I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. I consent to the collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure of my information in accordance with the Postmedia's Privacy Policy.

Postmedia wants to improve your reading experience as well as share the best deals and promotions from our advertisers with you. The information below will be used to optimize the content and make ads across the network more relevant to you. You can always change the information you share with us by editing your profile.

By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.

I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. I consent to the collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure of my information in accordance with the Postmedia's Privacy Policy.