A matter of taste

"Peter F." <effectivespamblock at ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:Cp2_b.981$3X5.30094 at nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> Hi again Ken,
>> I would prefer to see more bite
> than bark; Less of a hark back to
> yesterdays neurological natter, mere
> nuisances, or nothing much; And more
> of a nark about what is the real
> evolutionary and psychobiological bitch
> than about nothing much or which ever
> euphemistic old views. %-}
>> P
"bark vs. bite":
Sorry, Peter, you know me: ~"Go the
extra mile, turn the other cheek, and
give 'em your shirt, too".
Free Will =must= be Guarded.
This's True be-cause it's individual
nervous systems that, individually,
see Truth, or not.
In the matter of NDT's understanding,
each Person will be their own 'Judge'.
I can only Choose for myself.
And, if you think that NDT's stuff
"hark[s] back", then you don't, yet,
understand NDT's stuff.
It Encompasses stuff that's long
been Known, but it does so in a
way that's unprecedented.
[If you're talking about my Attributing
Priority to Jesus. Yes, I stand on that,
with jaw-hanging-down, that the ex-
perimental results point directly to Him.
I'm Willing to Die for this, Peter. I'll
never 'deny' it. I've seen it with my own
eyes.]
ken [k. p. collins]