Just been reading through this post and I noticed the Nashville thing. Adam has been recording some of his 4th solo album in Nashville so I suspect the foreign interview with Roger got lost in translation. I doubt they are recording together.

sharon20 wrote:Just been reading through this post and I noticed the Nashville thing. Adam has been recording some of his 4th solo album in Nashville so I suspect the foreign interview with Roger got lost in translation. I doubt they are recording together.

I think it was definitely confirmed by several native speakers as the correct translation.

From everything I've heard in various interviews I get the feeling Roger is the only one who would really be up for it. Brian has said he got the feeling the fans didn't want anything other than original Queen recordings and Adam doesn't sound keen either.

I haven't read through the whole thread, but wanted to give my two cents anyway. In my opinion they should stick with Adam Lambert for the foreseeable future. He and the band are a great match and they sound phenomenal. I can't really think of Another singer I'd want after the "+"-sign.

As for new Music, I'd be up for it if the band is. It's theirs to do with what they want. And since it's Queen+ it won't "tarnish" anything.

So if the idea is that there was a misunderstanding caused by translation then the rest of the conversation was as well because they had follow up comments about releasing a full studio l.p. Roger wants to. Brian no. Adam maybe. Plus Roger made it clear in this supposed mistranslation that while they had started recording then and there they have a long, long way to go still. So my question is does anyone think much of anything was really done in the studio over a twenty four hour period of them arriving somewhere, doing a show, and leaving in that amount of time? Maybe but what do I know? So I think thus far we agree the pesky guitarist should be fired, Roger should get a new line-up, and Adam is welcomed to partake if he feels like it, right?