In an opinion issued Monday, the Fourth Circuit upheld the statute, which prohibits lobbyists from contributing to the campaign of any candidate for the North Carolina General Assembly or the Council of State.

The State Government Ethics Act, of which the Campaign Contributions Prohibition is a part, was enacted to ensure that elected and appointed state agency officials fulfill their obligations free from impropriety, favoritism, and undue influence."

Preston, who claimed that she wanted to make campaign contributions of no more than $25, argued that the Campaign Contributions Prohibition is unconstitutional, both facially and as it applied to her, because it infringes on free speech rights and free of associations under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Preston said that the prohibition was overly restrictive because it applied year-round, regardless of whether the lobbyist had any dealings with the candidate in question.

While she acknowledged that it was appropriate to apply "closely drawn" scrutiny when evaluating campaign contribution limits, Preston asserted that a complete ban on campaign contributions "restricts direct speech rights of would-be contributors that lie at the core of political expression" and demands strict scrutiny under Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. Applying the closely drawn standard of scrutiny, the court found that the statute served the important governmental interest of avoiding corruption and the appearance of corruption while leaving open other sufficient means for political expression by lobbyists.

The Fourth Circuit concluded that the statute was constitutional both on its face and as applied to Preston.

It seems appropriate that the Fourth Circuit issued this opinion on the eve of Election Day. Do you agree with this decision? More importantly, do you think the Supreme Court will agree? Preston is a lobbyist for the ACLU of North Carolina, so we suspect that she has the organization's backing for a High Court appeal.

How would SCOTUS feel about the North Carolina's closely drawn restriction on free speech rights?

Categories:

Tags:

About U.S. Fourth Circuit

U.S. Fourth Circuit features news and information from the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which hears appeals from U.S. District Courts in North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland. This blog also features news that would be of interest to legal professionals practicing in the 4th Circuit. Have a comment or tip? Write to us.