More than 70 years after the Holocaust ended, survivors living in the United States continue to suffer. An estimated one-third of the 100,000 survivors in the country live at or below the poverty line, according to The Blue Card...Compared to the 10% of Americans age 65 and older who live in poverty, as reported by the US Department of Health and Human services, Holocaust survivors are a much greater risk group.Survivors from the former Soviet Union have it particularly bad, he said, with 80% of them living in poverty. “They came here much later in their life at the fall of the Soviet Union, with no Social Security, pension or any type of supporting income for retirement.” [ Hanan Simhon, vice president of Holocaust Survivor Services]

STOP RIGHT THERE, THIEF!

With no Social Security or any type of income for retirement?

That's a BIG GODDAMN LIE, as Simhon knows, but here he is being crafty, since they probably didn't sponge any money off their Kommie Kosher Komrades, but there's plenty of that kind of money from the gullible Americans

In 1989, Congress passed the Lautenberg Amendment, which is very generous to immigrating Jews, especially from the old USSR/Russia.

Those covered by the Lautenberg Amendment are eligible for Special Cash Assistance and for Federal Public Assistance Programs including, but not limited to, Social Security, Medicaid, Food Stamps, and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.Soviet Jews were eligible for eventual permanent resident status as well as access to cash assistance, language courses, and job-training programs normally provided only to bona fide refugees.

That's right, moochers who never paid a dime into Social Security now get monthly checks, Medicaid, Food Stamps and housing while Congress tells Americans who worked all their live that their isn't enough money to pay them what's owed.

Plus, the Jew Claims Conference, the US group responsible for uhh, gently picking pockets from Europe's governments and businesses that existed during WW II, also help:

All Holocaust compensation and restitution payments are excluded from calculations relating to eligibility for federally funded benefits, per 1994 federal legislation. The legislation stated that payments made to individuals because of their status as victims of Nazi persecution are to be excluded from income and resources in determining both eligibility for and the amount of benefits or services ... which provides benefits or services based on need such as, but not limited to, Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income, food stamps (SNAP) and Federally subsidized Housing programs.

So when these survivors are getting Holocau$t™ shake-down money from Germany, Austria, Croatia, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Russia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Macedonia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia & Montenegro, Slovak Republic, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Switzerland and many businesses and financial outfits, they don't have to report that to the Social Security folks, so those payments won't interfere with these grifters stealing OUR Social Security monies.

One more thing, WW II ended over 70 years ago, so what in the Hell were these leeches doing since then, playing the non-stop Holocau$t™ pity card, hoping to shake as many shekels as possible out of the easy to fool GOYIM?What they should of been doing is getting some training or education so they could enter the work--Yes, that FOUR-letter word, gasp! WORK--and make some money to live on, put some away for retirement, and maybe even get a decent job that paid a pension, which is what most people do. But most people aren't welfare moochers, expecting the rest of us to work while they enjoy the good life on your dime.

If Auschwitz was a 'death camp', why did they have a hospital for the Jews?
If Auschwitz was a 'death camp', why did they have Post Office for the Jews?
If Auschwitz was a 'death camp', why did they have BROTHEL for the Jews?

In the speech, Stolz discusses her experiences as a defence lawyer for so-called Holocaust deniers in Germany, and describes the Orwellian system of state-enforced repression there which denies defendants (and their lawyers!) the right to explain themselves under threat of additional charges for the “repeat offence” of expressing a forbidden idea, even in their own defence in a court of law. Stolz further relates how the subject of the Holocaust itself has never been clearly or adequately defined by the German courts through the normal channel of judicial findings-of-fact in precedent decisions. Instead, the courts have relied on the arbitrary doctrine that the facts of the Holocaust are “self-evident” and thus in no need of proof, despite the obvious objection that the arguments of the “deniers” themselves clearly demonstrate that those facts are indeed contestable and thus cannot be “self-evident” by definition.Stolz has been arrested, jailed and stripped of her license to practice law. And on February 25, 2015 she was sentenced to 20 months in prison for “racial incitation”… on the basis of statements she made in this speech. The talk was given on November 24, 2012.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information.
Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.