Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Tue Mar 28th Todays News

The free speech advocates are right that section 18c of the racial vilification act is untenable with free speech. I follow the IPA, Andrew Bolt, Tim Blair, Mark Steyn and others. They are also very wrong not to speak out against my abusers who have silenced me. They know me. They have heard me speak of my issues. And they have let me drift down river without offering help. I went to meet Mark Steyn at a free speech event organised by the IPA. He spoke cogently that we need to speak out and risk for free speech. I thanked him, and told him that I had done that, and that I had lost everything, but live in hope. It is no accident I have lost everything. I have very well placed abusers in the ALP and public service who have targeted me in outrageous, unlawful ways. They exceeded any charter provided by 18c. I was so concerned for my loved ones that I distanced myself, but that fit in well with my abusers plans to discredit me. But that kind of suited me because they didn't feel they needed to kill me. And that was part of my reasoning for distrusting Victorian Police whom my ice addicted abuser Stiffler claimed a connection. When I was trying to describe to police what Stiffler had done, I did not know what the reach of my abusers from NSW had been. "What are things that he said to you during the incident" "He said lots of things over the days and nearly eight hours he rampaged outside my door" "Such as?" "He said he was going to kill me" "How, what did he say?" "He was muttering a lot. He would scream he would stab me. He would break down my door. He would kill me in my sleep." "What did he say?" "He was upset I didn't let him have chips when I ordered delivery from Red Rooster or when I refused to go with him to a Brothel." "Are you saying you had a sexual relationship with him?" "No I did not. I simply am not the type of person who goes to brothels. I didn't judge him for it. I just would not go when he wanted me to go with him." Later, police asked, "Have you ever had adverse dealings with police in NSW?" "No." "Have you ever had any dealings with police in NSW regarding criminal conduct?" "No." but it seemed to me like they thought differently. Because I didn't know why Vic Police were being so incompetent regarding my personal safety I didn't know if my abusers from NSW were involved. I am now working under the assumption that Stiffler was being protected by Vic Police because he is a pedophile and they had to protect him while his pedophile nature was not germane to the immediate issue. And Stiffler had heard from me elements of my issues with campaigning over Hamidur Rahman. But the depraved indifference of Vic Police, after my past in NSW, is much more disturbing. And free speech advocates cowardly hide when faced with my bravery. I am very good and don't deserve the abuse given me. I created a video raising awareness of anti police feeling among western communities. I chose the senseless killing of Nicola Cotton, a Louisiana policewoman who joined post Katrina, to highlight the issue. I did this in order to get an income after having been illegally blacklisted from work in NSW for being a whistleblower. I have not done anything wrong. Local council appointees refused to endorse my work, so I did it for free. Youtube's Adsence refused to allow me to profit from their marketing it. Meanwhile, I am hostage to abysmal political leadership and hopeless journalists. My shopfront has opened on Facebook.Here is a video I made Call O Stoush

"Ginger Mick was a likeable rogue who, before he answered the call to arms to defend democracy, sold fresh rabbits in the streets of Melbourne. This book by CJ Dennis tells of his tender love for Rose and his experiences at war in North Africa. The verse is full of humour and pathos and truly captures the spirit of the era.
Contents:

INTRODUCTION
I. DUCK AN' FOWL
II. WAR
III. THE CALL OF STOUSH
IV. THE PUSH
V. SARI BAIR
VI. GINGER'S COBBER
VII. THE SINGING SOLDIERS
VIII. IN SPADGER'S LANE
IX. THE STRAIGHT GRIFFIN
X. A LETTER TO THE FRONT
XI. RABBITS
XII. TO THE BOYS WHO TOOK THE COUNT
XIII. THE GAME
XIV. "A GALLANT GENTLEMAN"

=== from 2016 ===

I go to my home tomorrow morning to take pictures. Then I go to the magistrates court to file an intervention order against a recalcitrant share house mate. I have never had to do such a thing in my life. I don't really want to. But He has left me with no choice. He has no reason to blame me for anything. But he despises me for being fat. I have politely turned down his offer to visit a brothel with him, or to share girls should he bring some home. I don't judge him for that, it is simply not how I roll. I don't drink alcohol and that upsets him too. But alcohol gives me gout and I don't need gout. I also don't smoke, including marijuana. I'm not his judge. But I don't hit flat mates. I don't drive drunk or drugged. I will never be arrested for drunkenness. And he has done all that in the last week, as fellas threatening to kill me and burn my goods I have stored in my home. He kicked in my door and so the police told me I had to move out for a time, leaving all my things exposed to him. Not having my shower, or medication, or papers or books or clothing beyond what I carried out at 4am after emergency police arrived Easter Sunday Morning. But I have been comforted and protected by friends. Whereas he only gets anything through manipulation and cruelty. And police protection which I don't get, until I get my intervention order. For some, at the moment, the Sex Party has more credibility.

=== from 2015 ===

NSW Election today and Premier Mike Baird faces off with ALP Luke Foley. Conservatives have government through coalition between Liberal Party and National Party. The default position of the state is ALP, with ALP government at all times since 1941, with the exception of '65 to '76 (Askin), '88 to '95 (Greiner/Fahey) and 2011 to now (O'Farrell/Baird). But entrenched corruption has seen the ALP be on the nose of voters. ALP has not reformed, and is still subject to union power brokers and corrupt payments from the state's poorest. The ALP is supported by a corrupt judiciary and media who turn a blind eye to ALP corruption, but denounce conservative politic at any opportunity usually without foundation. The result of which has seen a change of Premiers but a similar direction of policy from O'Farrell to Baird. So far, no substance of widespread corruption has been shown by the 'independent body' the ICAC which has investigated and campaigned against Liberal government but tacitly accepted ALP corruption.The policies being campaigned on are different. Conservatives have offered stable, responsible government which will rent electrical poles and wires for 99 years to pay for needed infrastructure. They have built things and offer to build more, including a new Sydney international airport, roads and trains. The ALP offer no new policies but promise to spend more, raise no new taxes, poles and wires to tax the poorest for electricity, oppose coal seam gas development. The ALP position is unbelievable, given their track record. The ALP leader has not held a lower house seat or a ministry position and is talentless, offering no direction or reform. But the ALP are coming from a low position and so are expected to improve through no fault of their own.An utterly selfish, depressed young man has killed 149 and himself in a plane crash in Germany. When a bank manager steals bank money, it is the bank's fault from oversight failure. Here too, the airliner, Germanwings, bears some responsibility for their pilot suiciding and killing others. There are campaigners for suicide who do not support the chosen method, although they campaign for sad, depressed people to be able to suicide. Any analysis of the victims shows the depth of the tragedy. Young, accomplished, decent people who had much to offer, taken by a vain, self serving, self seeking, sad young man. There needs to be some changes at Germanwings, but not much. It is very hard to prevent such evil, as assassins have shown over the years. And this evil highlights the choice NSW has. Return a responsible pilot, or a self serving liar.On this day in 37, Caligula named himself a Prince. In 193, Emperor Pertinax was assassinated by his own guard who then sold his throne to his enemy. Pertinax was only to reign for a few months, as did his successor, as the start of the year of five emperors. Important to remember the Roman year began in March (Spring). In 845, Paris was sacked by a Viking raider, rumoured to have been Ragnar Lodbrok. In 1889, the Yngsjö murder occurred in Yngsjö, Sweden: Anna Månsdotter was arrested along with her son. Anna was the last woman executed in Iceland. She had had an incestuous relationship with her son and killed his wife to cover it up. Her son was sentenced to death, but commuted to life imprisonment and paroled in 1913, before dying of TB in 1918. In 1933, an Imperial biplane City of Liverpool was apparently sabotaged by a german drug smuggling dentist who left his niece on board the burning craft before leaping to his death. There were no survivors. Dr Voss had been aware that authorities were losing in on his smuggling operation. In 1959, China took over Tibet. In 1990, President GHW Bush posthumously awarded the Congressional Medal of Honour to Jesse Owens. The late evening election result is the conservatives have clearly won the lower house but it remains to be seen if they are able to get legislation through the upper house.

From 2014

There is a culture war being fought and the over dominant Left are fighting dirty. The issue of honours is being fiercely contested by many who would accept a knighthood and don't really feel it matters. The reason why they fight it is because it does matter. It is not only school kids who like to see the way up pointed to. People like a direction, and when school kids are constantly told that nothing matters, they can't excel at anything, that nobody is better, but people are merely different, then they lose direction .. they need someone to point up. The Left have always despised direction and authority. They still use authority. The last time an Australian asked the queen to intervene in Australian affairs was when the ALP asked the Queen to prevent a democratic election for the dismissal. And they say they don't trust her, that she isn't really Australian.

One person who is Australian is former President of the ALP Michael Williamson. He has been sentenced to seven and a half years prison with a non parole period of five years. Another convict is his colleague Craig Thomson. Williamson has apologised for his activity and accepted responsibility for his wrongdoing. Thomson has blamed others and lied in his defence. Thomson's inadequate sentence was for one year, with a non parole period of three months. It would take a body like the Electoral Commission to fail to see the disparity between sentences. Thomson single handedly maintained a corrupt and inept government from 2010 to late 2013. Thomson is appealing his sentence. One reason for the disparity is the charges. Thomson has not been charged for all that he has done. The ALP defended both. In Thomson's defence, he isn't really Australian. So, according to ALP logic, he could be head of state, one day. The ALP want a republic because they'd prefer Williamson?

This column welcomes feedback and criticism. The column is not made up but based on the days events and articles which are then placed in the feed. So they may not have an apparent cohesion they would have had were they made up.

===

I am publishing a book called Bread of Life: January.

Bread of Life is a daily bible quote with a layman's understanding of the meaning. I give one quote for each day, and also a series of personal stories illustrating key concepts eg Who is God? What is a miracle? Why is there tragedy?

January is the first of the anticipated year-long work of thirteen books. One for each month and the whole year. It costs to publish. It (Kindle version) should retail at about $2US online, but the paperback version would cost more, according to production cost.If you have a heart for giving, I fundraise at gofund.me/27tkwuc

TURNBULL'S CHINA DISASTER

Why did Malcolm Turnbull want to sign an extradition deal with China that would have us send China people wanted by their police - when China's courts have had conviction rates of 99.98 per cent? And why did his government warn that we had to sign this or Australians in China would pay? My editorial from The Bolt Report:

Comedian Rod Quantock has lived nearby for 35 years and also objected. He does not want a 100-year-old box elder tree on the site cut down for the development. “It’s an amazing tree – to kill a tree like that is unconscionable,” he said. “It’s not a NIMBY thing.”

Oh, of course it isn’t. As you’d expect, all of these people reject Australia’s border protection policies, which might be because they know they’ll never have to deal with reffos in their own streets. These types can’t cope with a few dozen crazy homeless drunks. Imagine how they’d react to a 1000-bed refugee relocation facility.

Tim Blair – Monday,March 28,2016 (2:41am)

Joe Aston – a sometimes-controversial columnist for the national business daily Australian Financial Review – recently did something that ought to have been seen as not controversial at all. He simply went to work, as he usually does.

Reaction to this was explosive. Aston was denounced online by his colleagues at Fairfax Media, publisher of the Financial Review, and endured a campaign of online abuse from unionists and their supporters. It’s still underway today, more than a week after the fateful event.

Aston’s crime, you see, was to go to work while most of his Fairfax colleagues were on strike over the company’s plans to cut 120 journalist jobs.

Leftists can be remarkably intolerant, when it suits them. Aston’s mild announcement on Twitter – “Grateful for Fairfax Media colleagues remaining behind (= abiding by the law) to produce the news for our readers. We’re not all on strike” – produced the sort of rage usually only reserved for Coalition election victories.

“You’re exactly the kind of ‘hero’ who would applaud apartheid police beating protesters for ‘upholding the law’,” seethed ACTU chief of staff Ben Davison. “Extraordinary that anyone could be proud of this betrayal and cowardice,” declared unionist David McElrea. “Scabs are one rung above kiddie-fiddlers,” railed another.

As the strike’s end loomed, former Fairfax columnist Mike Carlton – funny during the ‘80s, not so funny in his 80s – anticipated ongoing hostility: “I imagine Fairfax journalists will have a warm welcome for the scab Aston if he shows his face this morning.”

Aston dealt with it easily enough. “I am not a scab,” he wrote in response. “I am turning up to work for my employer, as per my contractual obligations, and I am declining to participate in an unlawful strike organised by a union I’m not a member of …

“Meanwhile, weeks before they cover – independent, always – a federal election to be fought on the issue of union impropriety and thuggery, all of Fairfax’s reporters in the Canberra Press Gallery are out on a wildcat strike.”

Good point. Of course, there is one way Aston could have won the admiration of his colleagues and fellow leftists. There is one way he’d have guaranteed they would be making excuses for him rather than condemning him as a scab. There is one way he’d have leftists calling for his motives to be understood, and for his actions to be considered in the broader context of global events.

All he needed to do was convert to Islam and kill a few people. It’s just that easy.

Tim Blair – Monday,March 28,2016 (12:55am)

American Pie singer Don McLean postponed a planned 2016 Australian tour after his arrest over domestic violence allegations. The 70-year-old’s wife Patrisha called police in January during a dispute at their Maine home.

The couple briefly considered a reconciliation – which is why those shows were called off until next year. The delay was meant “to allow Don McLean and his family time to work at reuniting,” the singer’s management claimed.

Things didn’t exactly work out. “After having time to reflect on her marriage, Patrisha decided that divorce is in her best interest, both physically and emotionally,” Patrisha’s lawyer Gene Libby told the New York Daily News.

“Since Don McLean’s arrest for domestic violence assault, domestic terrorising, domestic violence criminal threatening, criminal restraint and criminal mischief on January 18, 2016, Don has been prohibited from contacting her, and she has gained strength and insight away from his influence and control.”

McLean completely denies all charges. Interestingly, throughout all of this there has been little noise from Australia’s generally rowdy social justice community, who have previously campaigned to prevent tours by performers Snoop Dogg, Chris Brown and Tyler, The Creator.

All three were targeted because of lyrics judged to be anti-women and, in Brown’s case, his history of domestic violence. So why – even before McLean voluntarily withdrew from his 2016 Australian tour – was there no campaign to ban this accused “domestic terrorist”?

Well, just a theory, but McLean is white. Snoop Dogg, Chris Brown and Tyler, The Creator are black.

It could be that our social justice warriors are just a little bit racist.

An explosion tore through a public park crowded with families in the Pakistani city of Lahore Sunday night, killing as many as 65 people and wounding more than 200, according to Pakistani officials. The blast occurred around 6:30 p.m. local time in a parking lot at Gulshan-e-Iqbal Park, near a children’s ride… Many were there to celebrate the Easter holiday…Most of the injured were women and children, according to the AFP.... The attack appeared to be a suicide bombing. A faction of the militant Taliban group in Pakistan, known as Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, has claimed responsibility for the attack, saying it had deliberately targeted Christians...

Of course, there is one way Aston could have won the admiration of his colleagues and fellow leftists. There is one way he’d have guaranteed they would be making ­excuses for him rather than condemning him as a scab. There is one way he’d have leftists calling for his motives to be understood, and for his actions to be considered in the broader context of global events. All he needed to do was convert to Islam and kill a few people. It’s just that easy. Our leftist friends would never dare use such strong language against Islamic terrorists, not even when they slaughter nearly 3000 people.

No wonder Tony Abbott thinks he still has a chance when his media haters cheer his policies once they think Malcolm Turnbull is the author. Chris Kenny:

Readers will have noticed (press) gallery antipathy to policies on border protection, climate change, national security and foreign affairs has evaporated because the salesman, rather than the substance, has changed…Last week, during my morning heart-starter (Paul Bongiorno’s politics segment on RN Breakfast) we heard one of the gallery’s leading Abbott deniers try to explain how his — shall we say — feelpinions changed reality. Bongiorno supported Turnbull’s strong and sensible comments the previous night about how border protection helped Australia’s national security and that Europe’s porous borders were allowing terrorists to exploit the refugee crisis.We need rewind only five months to hear Bongiorno fairly spitting his derision at similar sentiments made (presciently, as it turns out) by Abbott in London. “Among the European right it will go down a treat,” sneered Bongiorno in October, “it is a mindset that overstates and catastrophises everything.” (This was weeks before the Paris terrorist horror.) Bongiorno claimed Abbott wanted refugees treated with “even greater inhumanity” and called for “more agile” thinking. “And a lessening of this outrageous overstating of the threat to Europe, you know (as if) Europe, which is over 200 million, is going to be threatened even by one million people fleeing or seeking refuge.”But last week Bongiorno had only praise for Turnbull when he made Abbott’s points. “I think what we are seeing here, very much, is a complete difference of tone and a breadth of context that Malcolm Turnbull has brought to the whole discussion since becoming Prime Minister,” he shared. Here was Bongiorno’s chance to admit his misjudgment and give Abbott credit for seeing and saying all this first. Not likely.“There is no doubt Tony Abbott overcooked it, he talked about team Australia, he had the Muslim community offside, he sowed seeds of suspicion that boatpeople themselves could all be potential terrorists, so there is no doubt there is a different tone coming from Malcolm Turnbull, a welcome different tone.” Yep, forget the substance, it’s all about tone(ee).j

Reader Peter of Bellevue Hill:

What’s most galling about Bonge’s analysis is that the ‘different tone’ struck by Turnbull has been harsher than Abbott’s. As Simon Benson notes, Turnbull has arguably gone further in his comments than Abbott - and Julie Bishop certainly has. If in Bonge’s view Abbott ‘overcooked it’, how can he not be scathing of Turnbull and Bishop?

THE Belgian Ambassador’s attack on Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull suggests he is in dangerous denial about Islamic terrorism.
If Jean-Luc Bodson truly represents Belgium’s views, his country is stuffed.
Turnbull last week criticised Europe for doing too little to stop the terrorism that killed 130 people in Paris last year and 31 in Brussels last week, warning: “European governments are confronted by a perfect storm of failed or neglected integration, foreign fighters returning from Iraq and Syria, porous borders, and intelligence and security apparatus struggling to keep pace.”
He is largely right, though by criticising “neglected integration” he apparently assumes that large Muslim minorities like the 300,000 in Brussels can be integrated, or wants to. Has any northern European country succeeded in this “integration”? Have we?
No, if he can be criticised, it’s not for what he said but what he didn’t.
(Read full article here.)

I BRING hope for people who think they’re cursed forever. See, I was shy, too, until I suddenly realised this year I wasn’t.
True, I sometimes get slack and let that old panic seize me.
Last month, for instance, I raced out of a room of school parents, feeling suddenly stripped naked of small talk.
But, really, I’m pretty much cured and reckon you could be, too.
Scoffers will say there’s no way I could be shy since I make a living on radio and TV, but that’s no contradiction. I’ve met very shy actors, for instance.
In fact, one of the world’s best, Tom Hanks, says he, too, was “a shy geek” at school and was crippled by self-doubt for years afterwards.
But here is the difference between public performance and private shyness.
(Read full column here.)

Tim Blair – Saturday,March 28,2015 (5:25am)

Check your privilege, you rich bastards! My initial score was 150, but then I changed “agnostic” to “atheist” and was somehow awarded another ten privilege points. Next I converted to Islam, which sent me plummeting to just 110, before a concluding Judaic transition resulted in a spectacular 185-point final score. Beat that, lowly Gentiles!

Four envirocranks huddled in the dark. Sounds like a sleepover at Ted Kaczynski’s place. Perhaps some Marrickville music will make the hour of deprivation pass more quickly. Meanwhile, our friends at the Australian Tax Office received this email yesterday morning from Justin Untersteiner, the Assistant Commissioner of ATO Finance:

To show our commitment to the environment, the ATO is participating in Earth Hour for the ninth year running. Earth Hour is a global initiative that asks everyone to switch off their lights for one hour tomorrow night to show the power of collective action.

We are proud to join the rest of Australia and the world to support Earth Hour. Play your part by limiting printing today where it isn’t crucial to business. Before leaving the office today, shut down your computer, and switch off your monitor, radios, appliances and lights.

Our support of the Earth Hour initiative supports the ATO’s environmental management strategy. The ATO environment vision 2012-2017 and action plan translate the guiding principles and the six targets that the ATO aims to achieve by 2017, which in-turn will assist in reducing our carbon footprint.

We encourage you to participate in Earth Hour activities in the office and at home, and read more about what the ATO is doing to minimise our environmental impact.

So long as it distracts the ATO from taking my money, I applaud their Earth Hour commitment. But the anonymous ATO employee who forwarded that email has other plans: “Not only do I not support Earth Hour but I will be watching Labor and the Greens who love such stuff cop a flogging in NSW on the TV when this scam is underway with as many electrical appliances and lights on as are available to me.”

Tim Blair – Saturday,March 28,2015 (4:00am)

The NSW election is going badly for Labor. It is in danger of posting its second-worst election result ever - under 35 per cent of the primary vote, and with perhaps as few as 30 seats, but no more than around 35. It could have lost a couple of seats to the Greens. It is a disaster.
Overnight, the heat goes onto federal Labor leader Bill Shorten.
He is running the kind of campaign that has just backfired on NSW Labor leader Luke Foley - anti-reform, pro-union, small-target, populist, deceitful and banking on an anti-Abbott swing. He just didn’t seem serious.
Tony Abbott is safe as Liberal leader for a long time yet. But can Bill Shorten last as Labor’s leader?
Much more on this on The Bolt Report tomorrow on Channel 10 at 10am and 3pm, with Treasurer Joe Hockey, former NSW Labor Treasurer Michael Costa and IPA boss John Roskam, plus Tim Blair.
UPDATE
Labor Senator Sam Dastyari tonight:

It was never about Abbott.

NSW Labor leader Luke Foley on March 25:

Remove Mike Baird and you remove Tony Abbott.

Love the spin.
UPDATE
Sam Dastyari on Sky News demands that former Labor Minister and ACTU president Martin Ferguson be expelled from the Labor Party for having appeared in Liberals ads blasting the Labor lies about privatisation.
He calls Ferguson a “rat” who committed a “bastard act” and “treason” of the kind that once got people “hung, drawn and quartered”.
What Dastyari can’t get is that a Labor party which disgusts a stalwart and Labor great as Ferguson has lost its way and isn’t worth voting for. Labor would in fact be healthier if the likes of Dastyari were expelled instead.
UPDATE
Labor looks like winning a net 11 seats when it hoped for at least 15 and probably 20.

I also believe Bishop should not submit to a faith she does not follow, unless she’s visiting a mosque. Then the normal rules of courtesy apply, particularly when it’s a condition of entry.
(Thanks to reader Gab.)

Sky News, part-owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, shows all the balance that the vast state-owned ABC does not, despite the ABC’s legal obligation to do so.Gerard Henderson:

(T)he ABC remains a Conservative Free Zone with not one conservative presenter or producer or editor for any of the taxpayer funded public broadcaster’s prominent television or radio or online outlets. Not one ... Well what about Sky News – which is generally regarded as right-of-centre and which has some links with The Australian? The following left-of-centre types have hosting arrangements or formal contributor status on Sky News:

So Sky News has eight left-of-centre regular paid contributors or presenters on its prominent programs. However, the ABC has no right-of-centre regular paid contributors on its prominent programs.

Henderson understates his case, Most Sky News presenters actually range from slightly Left-of-centre (David Speers, Stan Grant, Derryn Hinch and Peter van Onselen) to mainstream Left (David Lipson, Janine Perrett, Helen Dalley, Laura Jayes, Kieran Gilbert), although most try much harder than their ABC rivals to be fair and balanced.
The conservative exceptions are few and not always consistently conservative: Paul Murray, Alan Jones, Chris Kenny and Ross Cameron, with Paul Kelly in the centre. Interestingly, Murray and Jones also host or co-host the station’s two most popular programs, which says plenty.
(Thanks to reader Peter of Bellevue Hill.)

QUEENSLAND’S fledgling Labor Government has been thrown into crisis amid allegations an MP abused a former partner and “acted like an animal” during their relationship. Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk was last night forced to refer Member for Cook Billy Gordon to police over the alle­gations which were received by her office more than a week ago.The abuse allegations are contained in a 10-page statement by Mr Gordon’s former partner and a letter purportedly written by the MP to the woman in 2006 after their relationship ended.A police investigation is a nightmare scenario for the minority Palaszczuk Government, which is clinging to power by a single seat…The statement sent to Ms Palaszczuk, which The Courier-Mail has obtained, includes a letter purportedly by Mr Gordon to the woman in which he admits to a history of abuse and controlling behaviour amid pleas for forgiveness…“I’ve treated you bad and hurt you deep, I’ve acted like an animal,’’ he states.... “I hope in time you can forgive me for the abuse...”The loss of a single MP risks the new Labor administration being thrown from office just weeks after it assumed control… The crisis comes after The Courier-Mail revealed yesterday that Mr Gordon was forced by Labor to pay thousands of dollars in unpaid child support for two of his children and complete years of tax returns.

The LNP held Cook briefly until the last election.
UPDATE
Then there’s this, from Des Houghton:

A FORMER High Court judge has found serious union wrongdoing in the Queensland building industry and recommended criminal charges against a union boss with strong links to the Palaszczuk Government. The Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption found there were bribes, extortion, secret commissions and “other unlawful payments’’ involving members of the CFMEU, a powerful union and Labor backer whose members in Queensland include Police Minister Jo-Ann Miller and Jim Pearce, the Member for Mirani.There were no suggestions of impropriety by Miller or Pearce although Justice John Dyson Heydon’s interim report to Parliament was scathing against their union…He recommended criminal charges against key CFMEU officials including Queensland secretary Michael Ravbar, a personal friend of several unionists who are now members of Parliament…Ravbar is a vice-president of the Queensland Council of Unions which directs Labor policy and has a say in the appointment of Queensland Cabinet ministers.Palaszczuk joined Ravbar and other union chiefs at a rally in Gladstone last year in which she made a speech praising unions, Green Left Weekly reported.Palaszczuk also foolishly marched with the CFMEU in Brisbane this month and had a “selfie” taken with Dave Noonan, the CFMEU’s national secretary… The latest findings of union corruption place Miller in an especially invidious position. As Police Minister she controls the force helping to investigate the most serious charges faced by the union.

They say voters always get it right.
Not this time, they didn’t.
(Thanks to readers Peter of Bellevue Hill, John, Mark W and Nathan.)

Old boys from one of Sydney’s most prestigious public schools say they are disgusted that federal cabinet minister Scott Morrison will be a special guest at an alumni fund-raising event, warning it would be an embarrassment to their school to celebrate a man who has “so flagrantly disregarded human rights”. Almost 300 alumni of Sydney Boys High have signed a fiercely-worded letter to the school’s Old Boys Union, which is organising a fund-raising cocktail event next month featuring Mr Morrison as one of its keynote speakers. But the invitation has infuriated many of the school’s alumni, including the former Supreme Court judge Hal Wootten and veteran journalist John Pilger, who say it “is cruel and insensitive for the union to laud this man’s connection to the school, its graduates, and their families.”

So my open letter today is not about politics, or a commentary on what we as a country do right or wrong. It’s not about past decisions made, dollars spent or programs funded. It’s about the damage caused by one single statement. It’s about the disharmony that can come from one man’s words. The fact our Prime Minister is acknowledged as having done so much work in the area of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health - for him to make the remarks he did, as the leader of our country – what must the world think of us? His words have isolated Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders even more than they are already…I am a strong supporter of the work being done to close the health gap between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous Australians and there is much great work being done, but comments like those made recently by our PM only serve to empower the ugly side of our society. For what it’s worth, I don’t think Mr Abbott was deliberately being racist, but one comment from someone in such a powerful position can cause so much damage.

The absurd and punishing politics of seeming, not doing. Vilify Abbott for a comment, yet ignore the human tragedy he’s actually trying to discuss and fix.
For God’s sake, we’ve got to get over this “gotcha” morality and get serious. Less abuse, more argument. And much more action.
(Thanks to reader John.)

Spooked Liberals in NSW are warning the federal leadership crisis threatens to derail their re-election campaign, as a federal Coalition minister conceded on Thursday that a spill motion against Prime Minister Tony Abbott is now likely… Fairfax Media has learned a number of federal MPs are under pressure from state colleagues to line up behind Malcolm Turnbull and force a change, and to get it done quickly.

FEW state elections have been so important to Australia’s future — and our sanity — as Saturday’s poll in NSW. It will help answer three questions. Have we really gone mad? Are we really going to let superstition make us poor?And how much longer can Labor leaders — including federal Opposition Leader Bill Shorten — get away with shameless, destructive populism?Well, with luck NSW voters will punish the rabble-rousers who have hijacked Labor and force a return to evidence-based policies where reason rules and ratbags weep. Indeed, I suspect a good result for the Baird Government will light a fire under Shorten, whose style of leadership too closely matches that of NSW Labor leader Luke Foley.

BILL Shorten’s critics inside the Labor Party are growing. You don’t have to go far to find detractors in the party organisation, the unions or among the membership, including Labor elders, or to hear complaints about policy, strategy, communications or the slow pace of party reform. Even some of Shorten’s biggest supporters concede they are disappointed.

(T)here is an increasing anxiety within Labor ranks about the right way to proceed from here. It’s not just about Bill Shorten, though the Opposition Leader has a big problem that is separate from the general one facing Labor. If voters think the Prime Minister is a fool, they don’t really think anything of Shorten at all. Even in focus-group feedback that is neutral about him, he hasn’t established any credibility…

Now, with a solid win for Mike Baird’s Government in prospect in today’s NSW election, it could be Bill Shorten’s turn to feel the heat. Baird showed guts in campaigning on a policy of privatising parts of the NSW electricity network to free up capital for new infrastructure spending. State Labor leader Luke Foley had nothing to offer except opposition to the Baird plan…The lesson expected to emerge is that a reform agenda can still be an election winner for a politician who does not frighten the horses and takes the time and trouble to earn the public’s trust.Labor has always claimed to be the party of reform. Shorten professes to believe in big ideas. Success for Baird should show the Opposition Leader the folly of being a federal Foley.

The NSW election offers a stark view of modern Labor — tied to union interests, hooked on pro-green politics and reliant upon vote-gathering via hysteria against whatever market-based reform is on offer… Labor is politically clever but policy weak. It offers NSW no ­viable agenda for long-run government. It may yet receive an electoral reward of sorts but this campaign exposes the desperation and bankruptcy of an unreconstructed Labor Party. It is a siren signal for federal Labor that won’t necessarily be heard.Labor talks endlessly about reform but seems incapable of any decisive break from its structure and culture. Its campaign against Liberal Premier Mike Baird’s electricity privatisation is one of the most dishonest in any election in decades. The unions are both an asset and brand poison…Labor as a governing force looks outdated, ill-equipped and hostage to entrenched interests… Labor looks like a party that has learnt little from the failures of the Rudd-Gillard era. It is better suited to campaigning from opposition than governing from the Treasury benches.

GERMAN prosecutors revealed the “significant discovery” made at Germanwings co-pilot Andreas Lubitz’s home was a sick note for the day of the crash. The shocking evidence came from the search of Lubitz’s homes, in two German cities, for an explanation of why he deliberately crashed the Airbus A320 into the French Alps.Prosecutors found “torn-up and current sick leave notices” in Lubitz’s home,suggesting he was receiving medical treatment but hid his illness from his employer and colleagues.While investigators did not specify what illness Lubitz had, German media reports he needed ongoing assessments for severe depression, BBC reports… Authorities did not find a “suicide note or a confession”, or any evidence that the co-pilot’s actions may have been motivated by “a political or religious background”.

Tony Nutt may move back to Tony Abbott’s office after NSW election.A final decision has not been taken on whether Mr Nutt will return to the Prime Minister’s office but Fairfax Media has confirmed with multiple sources that discussions about the move have taken place at the highest levels of government.It is unclear what title Mr Nutt would be given but many in government expect he would perform the same job he performed for former prime minister John Howard - that of principal private secretary and political “fixer”.Such a move would not necessitate Ms Credlin leaving the Prime Minister’s office - as some have urged - but would be seen as an attempt to address perceptions that power is too centralised.At the same time, Ms Credlin - who has kept a low profile since the failed spill motion amid concerns about her iron grip on decision making processes within government - has in recent weeks been engaged in a charm offensive that has seen her reaching out to MPs to listen to their policy concerns…The appointment of Mr Nutt, said the MP who is one of many MPs aware discussions are under way, would provide a “second conduit to the boss [Mr Abbott]”.

But Nutt’s appointment is only half the answer. How it is made to work is the rest. As I noted in February:

Yes, Credlin has been too dominant and too noticeably so. Yes, the Prime Minister should have more sources of advice - and a contest of ideas - at the very heart of his office. And yes, some of Credlin’s critics (but far from all) want Abbott to sack her so they can then pounce and call her a mere scapegoat for Abbott’s own failures. She will just be their entree. So I’ll repeat the suggestion I have been giving since last year. It is a compromise that doesn’t just take the heat off Credlin but makes Abbott’s office stronger.Abbott should appoint at least one more person, every bit as senior and as trusted as Credlin, as his political or communications guru - the kind of intimate confidant that Peter Barron and Geoff Walsh were to Bob Hawke.... Critics say Credlin would never accept a rival to her power. But she is highly intelligent. I am sure she knows changes must be made - and signalled every day - if she is to save not just herself but the Prime Minister whose interests she serves.

Nutt, who has held a range of important Liberal Party posts, was made NSW director last year to stabilise a branch rocked by fundraising scandals uncovered by the Independent Commission Against Corruption. He had earned enormous respect as prime minister John Howard’s troubleshooter and party liaison man. His most important role was as a conduit between the prime minister and the backbench.Coalition MPs knew that, if they had a concern, telling Nutt about it was as good as talking to the PM direct. Howard would be briefed and action would be taken.The lack of a similar system in the current Prime Minister’s Office — with chief of staff Peta Credlin tightly controlling all access and backbenchers kept at arm’s length — is a key reason the February spill motion gained such strong support.News that Nutt might join the team trying to rebuild Abbott’s leadership has cheered Liberals, but it is not a done deal. Nutt worked in Abbott’s office briefly after the change of government, helping with transition arrangements, and some sources say it was not a happy experience.They believe he would want firm guarantees of access to the PM and independence from Credlin before agreeing to return. If he does report for duty in the new role, though, it will be another indication of Abbott getting his act together.

He will get some guarantees. It will be critical, though, that they are honoured.
(Thanks to reader John.)

How lovely if the hundreds of thousands of dollars of Labor and union ads telling lies about privatisation turn out to have actually cost votes:

The NSW Coalition government is set for an easy victory in today’s election, according to the latest Newspoll, with Labor support slipping. The Liberal-­Nationals ­Coalition leads the ALP by 55 per cent to 45 per cent on a two-party-­preferred basis.Such a result, if the swing were uniform, would see the government lose 17 seats…Although this Newspoll is similar to the last, taken at the start of the campaign, it appears that Labor’s support has slipped slightly, despite a multi-million-dollar advertising blitz against privatisation of the electricity distribution networks. Labor’s primary vote has slipped from 36 per cent to 34 per cent, while the government’s has risen one point to 44 per cent, suggesting the privatisation campaign has been ineffective, if not counterproductive.

UPDATE
But a caution - and yet another reminder that proportional representation and upper houses are making stable government very hard:

Piers Akerman – Thursday,March 27,2014 (8:06pm)

PRIME Minister Tony Abbott’s quirky segue into the quaint realm of official orders caught many by surprise. But the howls of derision from the opposition benches and the usual clattering of Labor acolytes within the ABC and Fairfax media were as hypocritical as they were confected.

Tim Blair – Friday,March 28,2014 (3:33am)

The Marchist movement, lately prominent at this site, has taken collective offence over perceived insults. The Marchers insist that they are normal and even able to work. In the interests of community harmony, here are several more Work on Wednesday snaps of our Marchie comrades, beginning with the Sullivan clan:

“We marched in march, worked on Wednesday, digging ditches, changing nappies and going to Uni and school. We marched for education, workers rights, the environment, NDIS, a fair go for refugees.The march in Melbourne was such a beautiful coming together of intelligent good hearted Australians!”

I have had two articles banned after I mocked the retribalising of Australia - the absurd new “racial” divisions being forced on us. It is bizarre that arguments against racism are now being denounced as racist.
But today The Age runs an opinion piece arguing just that point - that resisting racial division is itself racist. This is Orwell meeting Kafka.
In it Waleed Aly argues against the Abbott Government’s proposal to reform the Racial Discrimination Act so comments are judged by the standards of the “ordinary reasonable member of the Australian community”:

I’m astonished. Aly is arguing that those of us who say we should have a colour-blind view of the “ordinary reasonable member of the Australian community” are actually racist, blind to anyone not white themselves. We are “too white”, even if some of those holding this position are not white at all. Aly says we must instead see everyone not as individuals but representatives of some “race”. To judge people by their “race” or “whiteness” is now the only way not to be racist. Dead is the argument of Martin Luther King that we should believe “all men are brothers” and create “a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character”. Did King give “the whitest answer possible” in dreaming of “racial neutrality”?
Aly’s argument also relies on an offensive stereotype that any judge, magistrate. human rights commissioner or jury member being asked to consider the views of the “ordinary reasonable member of the Australian community” is either white (and therefore blind to other “races") or simply racist, and unable to conceive of any “normal” construct of Australian identity which isn’t “white”. This is not only false, but arguably racist, assuming a lack of insight in whites that I suspect Aly credits in himself as a “non-white”.

This matters because – if I may speak freely – plenty of white people (even ordinary reasonable ones) are good at telling coloured people what they should and shouldn’t find racist, without even the slightest awareness that they might not be in prime position to make that call.

To judge how offensive and racialist that statement is, try another equally unacceptable formulation: “Plenty of black people (even ordinary reasonable ones) are good at telling white people what they should and shouldn’t find offensive, without even the slightest awareness that they might not be in prime position to make that call.”

Excuse me, but how about we just deal with people’s arguments, and not judge those arguments by the colour of the person making them?
Instead, we are being retribalised along spurious “racial” lines, reduced to racial caricatures and robbed of our freedom and right to protest.

On the show on Sunday: Who are these people telling you what you can’t say and can’t hear?
Guests Anthony Dillon, who identifies as “part Aboriginal”, Judith Sloan and former NSW Treasurer Michael Costa.
So much to tackle: is Bronwyn Bishop the victim of misogyny? How bad was the Government’s last week? Where does Labor get off, lecturing on Budget deficits?
In NewsWatch, the great Gerard Henderson on how newspapers are refusing to help police catch certain suspects.
Plus Your Say, and a question: which of these two parties would you go to? And subsidise?
On Network 10 at 10am and 4pm.

I would ask my Jewish friends, especially those fighting Tony Abbott’s free speech reforms, to interpret Afroz Ali’s warning correctly - as a plea for laws to muzzle those who have warned against the rise of Islamist extremism:

Jewish community leaders should consider: if I am to be muzzled by someone like Afroz,moderate though he may be said to be, are they safer or more exposed?
As they consider this, here’s some positions Afroz has taken which I would need my free speech to criticise:

The sickest part of this tyrannical coin is that there have already been thousands of ordinary Palestinians murdered on their own lands by Israel. The other side of this coin is that the Governments of the USA and Australia, consider the citizens of this world to be idiots, that the citizens do not recognise truth… The only plan USA, Israel and Australia want to remember is their plan - self interest. The causes of the continuing war and loss of lives in the Middle East is a taboo topic… Retaliations and self-defence of the Palestinians are now labelled as terrorist, whilst state-terror and genocide is promoted as “Israel’s right to defend itself”. The evil in the leadership of these countries is bringing this world to an abyss… As citizens of this world, it is a most crucial responsibility upon us that a handful of a few must not take the rest of humanity into that abyss, full of evil, that the likes of Hitler once did.

Al Qaeda as a group is a very mysterious group. It seems to me only the American Government knows much about it… Having said that, whatever the classification for al Qaeda is, that there is a militant body out there which is in fact reacting to very high levels of imperialism, very high levels of natural resources grab in different parts of the world and also without a doubt a political and ideological fight which comes out of all of that.

Professor [James] Allan said there were no hate speech laws in the US and it was a destination of choice for minority groups around the world… Professor Allan said that “in the long run, letting people rip is the best protection for minority groups”.He added that by silencing people, “it doesn’t get rid of the problem, it drives it underground, it turns them into martyrs, it’s very short-term thinking"…Indigenous man Wesley Aird, a former member of John Howard’s indigenous advisory council, said he supported free speech, arguing legislation would never stop racism. “I am in favour of free speech and firmly of the view that no amount of legislation can stop idiots saying stupid things,” Mr Aird said.

UPDATE
Graham Richardson sees no reason for the Government to change the law:

But, Graham, just to say the case shouldn’t have got that far does not address the problem. The case did and even succeeded. So what do you think of the law permitting that? Do we reform it to prevent such cases or do we just accept the overreach?Richardson adds:

During the past couple of decades, most of the problems associated with allegations of racism received only moderate media interest and disappeared into the labyrinthine corridors of the Human Rights Commission, never to be heard of again.

The fact that cases “disappeared” in the Human Rights Commission to be resolved in near secret does not mean that justice was done. It is very likely that some accused people simply did not have the money or heart to fight false claims. Is Richardson absolutely certain that not one of these cases involved innocent people paying “go-away” money to avoid being unfairly branded a bigot? Is he certain justice is really being done in every case?

The complainant, who is of Vietnamese and Chinese origin, ... alleged that a co-worker made offensive race-based comments to him such as “chink” and “gook”. He claimed that this co-worker also gave him ninja stars made from discarded metal. The complainant said he found this behaviour offensive as it implied that all Vietnamese people carry knifes. The complainant claimed that his employment was terminated after he made an internal complaint. The co-worker denied the allegations. The company said the complainant’s employment was terminated because of his performance and unexplained absences from work. The complaint was resolved with an agreement that the company would pay the complainant $2,000 general damages… The complainant, who is of African origin, was employed as a store person in a supermarket. He claimed that the manager made race-based comments to him and reduced his shifts. He said that after an argument with this manager, he was told to leave the store and his employment was subsequently terminated. The respondent denied race discrimination and said the complainant was suspended because of inappropriate behaviour. The complaint was resolved on the basis of payment of $6,000 general damages…

The complainant who is African American, was employed on a casual basis with the respondent retail company. The complainant claimed that he was not afforded the same work opportunities as other employees and that his colleagues made adverse comments about his race and colour. The complainant said that eventually he was not offered further work. The respondent denied discrimination and said that the complainant had stopped turning up for his shifts. The ... matter was resolved with the respondent agreeing to pay the complainant $5,000 in general damages…

The complainant, who is from El Salvador, alleged she was harassed and bullied by a co-worker during her employment with the respondent religious organisation. The complainant said she raised her concerns with management and was told “you are being too emotional - this is because you are from South America”. The complainant’s position was subsequently made redundant and she alleged that this constituted racial discrimination… The organisation denied that comments connected to the complainant’s ethnic background were made as alleged. The organisation said the redundancy was due to a genuine restructure. The complaint was resolved with ... $3,000 financial compensation.The complainant, who is from India and of Hindu religion, was employed by the respondent child care organisation.... The complainant alleged that during her employment, she was performance managed because she was from a non-English speaking background and was treated differently than other staff who were not of her race and religion. She also claimed that the organisation failed to accommodate her carer’s responsibilities. The respondent denied that the complainant was treated differently to other employees and said that clients had raised concerns about the complainant’s communication skills and there were other performance issues. The respondent said the complainant was provided with work to coincide with her availability.... The respondent agreed to provide the complainant with ... $7,500.

The complainant, who is of Indian origin, claimed she was forced to resign from her employment as a customer service officer after four months. She claimed she was the only Indian employee with the respondent company and she alleged colleagues made derogatory comments about her and implied that she could not speak English properly. The complainant also claimed that her probation period was unfairly extended and she was performance managed due to her race. The respondent company denied discrimination and said the complainant was not its only employee of Indian origin. The company said the complainant was occasionally difficult to understand but denied she was treated negatively because of this. The company said the complainant’s probation was extended for performance reasons… The complaint resolved in conciliation with an agreement that the company would pay the complainant $5,000.

Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice accuses “weary” Barack Obama of giving in to trouble:

“Right now, there’s a vacuum,” she told a crowd of more than two thousand attending the National Republican Congressional Committee’s annual dinner… “There’s a vacuum because we’ve decided to lower our voice. We’ve decided to step back. We’ve decided that if we step back and lower our voice, others will lead, other things will fill that vacuum.” Citing Bashar al Assad’s slaughter in Syria, Vladimir Putin’s aggression in Ukraine, al Qaeda’s triumphant return to Fallujah, Iraq, and China’s nationalist fervor, she concluded: “When America steps back and there is a vacuum, trouble will fill that vacuum.”Rice ... mocked the naïve hope that “international norms” would fill the vacuum left by U.S. retreat and blasted the president for hiding behind the weariness of the public. “I fully understand the sense of weariness. I fully understand that we must think: ‘Us, again?’ I know that we’ve been through two wars. I know that we’ve been vigilant against terrorism. I know that it’s hard. But leaders can’t afford to get tired. Leaders can’t afford to be weary.”

Senator RYAN (Victoria—Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Education) (16:30): I have said before that I am a first amendment type of guy. I have long admired the American culture that values freedom of speech as a critical, non-negotiable and—I think even more importantly—virtually un-conditional component of a free society. Senator Wong talks about people being attacked. I should probably declare at this point that I am a longstanding member and a former research fellow of the Institute of Public Affairs. What we have heard from the other side of this chamber—and from my good friend, Senator Cameron, who has just left—over and over again is the vilification of people merely by virtue of the institute at which they work. There is a reason why the Greens and the ALP hate the Institute of Public Affairs—it is because it is not part of their public sector mentality. It challenges the precepts that they put up, and it cannot be bowed by the fact that it is not on the public sector drip, the way they wish all civil society was.What we have just heard from Senator Wong and what we have heard constantly from those opposite, including the Greens, relies on a profound misunderstanding of what our society is. They seem to view our rights, particularly our right to speech and our right to discuss—our right to participate in democracy and in a free flow of ideas—as coming to us via a licence from politicians or judges. They seem to think that, somehow, the laws in this place determine what we are allowed and not allowed to say. That is a profound misrepresentation of our constitutional and legal history. It is only in recent times that there have been such limits on things like speech. This is a profound fissure in what we view as the role of the state, and what we view as the role of the government and its relationship with the citizens of this country. Senator Wong accused Senator Brandis of celebrating the rights of bigots. What I will say is that I condemn the bigot, but I celebrate the rights of every citizen. And that is important, because a commitment to freedom of speech only really counts when it is tested. A commitment to freedom of speech only really counts when it comes to defending something you profoundly and viscerally disagree with—and that is where my commitment to free speech lies.It is not about the public funding of artists. I do not have to fund someone to support their right to say something. There is a profound difference between the allocation of taxpayers’ resources to give someone the right to do something, and the question of whether or not they are allowed to say something. I will defend the right of someone to speak, but that does not entail and should not be confused with the idea that I should resource them to speak.We have heard the constant complaints of those opposite over the last 48 hours about ethnic community leaders, multicultural community leaders, and their views on this particular proposal. I said at the start that I was a first amendment type of person: I view the proposal put up by the government and Senator Brandis in the exposure draft as a compromise. I accept that my views are not typical of all those in this place, or indeed all those in this country, in supporting a very strong and almost unlimited commitment to freedom of speech. The problem I have is that those opposite seem to see us as a nation of tribes; as a nation where self-declared leaders of communities—communities defined by race—should somehow should have a special place in the consideration of legislation that any other Australian citizen should not. Every Australian’s view has an equal standing in this place—every Australian’s view, no matter what community they declare themselves to be from; whether it be one or many; and whether or not they declare themselves to be leaders of communities. The elected bodies in this country are the elected representatives of the Australian people. We don’t believe in a corporatist society, or in one where there are a series of tribes where, somehow, some people have more rights than others. The ALP and the Greens seek to define this as a debate about racism when it is not. It is a debate profoundly about speech, its limits, and the role of governments, politicians and judges in limiting the rights of our fellow citizens to express ideas. How is it our role to empower certain people in Australia, in this case judges under the current law, to determine whether another opinion is arrived at or expressed in good faith? That is the current provision in section 18D of the Racial Discrimination Act. What happened to Andrew Bolt was that a court said that his opinion was not expressed in good faith. It did not just ban the expression of that opinion; it banned its re-publication. It had to declare an Orwellian moment—that it never happened.

His comments ridiculing people suffering health effects from wind turbines, by saying their illness may be caused by stress or being "sick with envy" for not getting payment for turbines on their properties – as an absolute disgrace.

His comments ridiculing ill Australians that have been forced to abandon their homes because of ultrasound from wind turbines is disgusting, appalling and demonstrates a complete ignorance – and that he is completely unfit to hold such highly paid taxpayer funded job.

Here's a chance for the PM to show some leadership – she should sack Mr. Flannery, today.

Already running over-time, over-budget and under-subscribed, the $37 billion NBN gamble is now even more likely to become our greatest white elephant. And it’s for the very reason that even the techno-clueless consumers have said from the start: who wants to be tethered to a wire in the wall?

THE company building the National Broadband Network, already under fire for running late, has admitted it faces rising competition from wireless networks offering improved services and prices. NBN Co has conceded its own modelling finds that if it increases prices by the maximum it expects to be allowed by regulators, the number of wireless-only premises will rise to 30 per cent by 2039-40 because affordability is such a significant factor for households…A Labor-commissioned report by corporate advisers Greenhill Caliburn in 2011 warned that the growing popularity of wireless internet could have a “significant” impact on the economics.

Now a senior NBN Co executive has said: “NBN Co faces competition from wireless networks that are increasing in capability over time, subject to significant economies of scale and scope (and therefore, decreasing cost per gigabyte delivered), and are expected to offer a potential substitute for NBN Co’s voice-only and entry-level voice and broadband services.”

Crean, Martin Ferguson, Bill Kelty and others expressed their repugnance at tactics unworthy of leaders… On Monday when Gillard was asked about class warfare and the criticisms, she replied: “My focus is on Australian classrooms and what happens in them, and that’s at the centre of Australian political life and the life of our nation.”How cute was that? How clever to turn class war into classroom. Too cute and too clever, really.On Tuesday when the ABC’s Sabra Lane asked again about class warfare, Gillard responded by seeking a definition of it, as if she could explain away or excuse what she and the Treasurer had been doing by reducing it to an exercise in semantics.Those who had been listening knew exactly what they were hearing: an attempt to pit people against one another on the basis of class, or sex, or race as in the case of foreign workers, for base political gain… The tactics of divide and rule will work about as well in the electorate as they do inside Labor.

In a leaked internal ALP memo, Queensland state secretary Anthony Chisholm this week pleaded to the “true believers” to lean on 2000 members who have yet to renew their memberships. “We need every single one of these 2000 members in order take the fight to Tony Abbott in September, and to Campbell Newman in 2014,” he said in the memo. “And we can’t do it without you.” It follows a recruitment drive in September last year with Labor cutting sign-up fees to $5 after membership of the Queensland division fell to around 5000 rank-and-file.

This week’s Newspoll in The Australian was totally in line with everybody’s expectations… The 16-point gap in the two-party-preferred vote was something even most Gillard supporters would have expected to see. It was the price they were prepared to pay to stop the man they despise so much. It is such a tragedy that Rudd is the most hated figure in the caucus. In 40 years of close study, I have never seen a hatred this toxic.

IT’S always “too soon” to talk about the boat people lured to their deaths by Labor.
Two years ago, when 50 boat people drowned off Christmas Island, I said the Government had “blood on its hands” for having dismantled our tough border laws.
Greens leader Bob Brown was livid: “Andrew Bolt’s call, while bodies were still in the ocean, for Julia Gillard’s resignation ... lacked human decency. He should resign.”
This week, it was again too soon.
(Read full article here.)
UPDATE
Even running out of money to deter boat people:

A PREGNANT asylum seeker deemed a security risk by ASIO was offered free domestic help and childcare while another detainee has had drooping eyelids fixed by taxpayers. An array of non urgent medical treatment provided to detainees has been revealed including a suspected war criminal who had his impacted wisdom teeth removed at no cost to him.

Morning

He never deserted them, but they in cowardly fear of their lives, fled from him in the very beginning of his sufferings. This is but one instructive instance of the frailty of all believers if left to themselves; they are but sheep at the best, and they flee when the wolf cometh. They had all been warned of the danger, and had promised to die rather than leave their Master; and yet they were seized with sudden panic, and took to their heels. It may be, that I, at the opening of this day, have braced up my mind to bear a trial for the Lord's sake, and I imagine myself to be certain to exhibit perfect fidelity; but let me be very jealous of myself, lest having the same evil heart of unbelief, I should depart from my Lord as the apostles did. It is one thing to promise, and quite another to perform. It would have been to their eternal honour to have stood at Jesus' side right manfully; they fled from honour; may I be kept from imitating them! Where else could they have been so safe as near their Master, who could presently call for twelve legions of angels? They fled from their true safety. O God, let me not play the fool also. Divine grace can make the coward brave. The smoking flax can flame forth like fire on the altar when the Lord wills it. These very apostles who were timid as hares, grew to be bold as lions after the Spirit had descended upon them, and even so the Holy Spirit can make my recreant spirit brave to confess my Lord and witness for his truth.

What anguish must have filled the Saviour as he saw his friends so faithless! This was one bitter ingredient in his cup; but that cup is drained dry; let me not put another drop in it. If I forsake my Lord, I shall crucify him afresh, and put him to an open shame. Keep me, O blessed Spirit, from an end so shameful.

Evening

"And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table."Matthew 15:27

This woman gained comfort in her misery by thinking great thoughts of Christ. The Master had talked about the children's bread: "Now," argued she, "since thou art the Master of the table of grace, I know that thou art a generous housekeeper, and there is sure to be abundance of bread on thy table; there will be such an abundance for the children that there will be crumbs to throw on the floor for the dogs, and the children will fare none the worse because the dogs are fed." She thought him one who kept so good a table that all that she needed would only be a crumb in comparison; yet remember, what she wanted was to have the devil cast out of her daughter. It was a very great thing to her, but she had such a high esteem of Christ, that she said, "It is nothing to him, it is but a crumb for Christ to give." This is the royal road to comfort. Great thoughts of your sin alone will drive you to despair; but great thoughts of Christ will pilot you into the haven of peace. "My sins are many, but oh! it is nothing to Jesus to take them all away. The weight of my guilt presses me down as a giant's foot would crush a worm, but it is no more than a grain of dust to him, because he has already borne its curse in his own body on the tree. It will be but a small thing for him to give me full remission, although it will be an infinite blessing for me to receive it." The woman opens her soul's mouth very wide, expecting great things of Jesus, and he fills it with his love. Dear reader, do the same. She confessed what Christ laid at her door, but she laid fast hold upon him, and drew arguments even out of his hard words; she believed great things of him, and she thus overcame him. She won the victory by believing in Him. Her case is an instance of prevailing faith; and if we would conquer like her, we must imitate her tactics.

Today's reading: Judges 1-3, Luke 4:1-30 (NIV)

Israel Fights the Remaining Canaanites

1 After the death of Joshua, the Israelites asked the LORD, "Who of us is to go up first to fight against the Canaanites?"

2 The LORD answered, "Judah shall go up; I have given the land into their hands."

3 The men of Judah then said to the Simeonites their fellow Israelites, "Come up with us into the territory allotted to us, to fight against the Canaanites. We in turn will go with you into yours." So the Simeonites went with them....

Jesus Is Tested in the Wilderness

1 Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, left the Jordan and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, 2 where for forty days he was tempted by the devil. He ate nothing during those days, and at the end of them he was hungry.

3 The devil said to him, "If you are the Son of God, tell this stone to become bread."

4 Jesus answered, "It is written: 'Man shall not live on bread alone.'"

5 The devil led him up to a high place and showed him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world. 6 And he said to him, "I will give you all their authority and splendor; it has been given to me, and I can give it to anyone I want to. 7 If you worship me, it will all be yours."

===There is no new Lent reading today; today is a catch-up day. If you've kept up with the daily readings so far, congratulations! If you've fallen behind, here are the readings from the last week in case you want to go back and catch up:

Translate

Subscribe To

Followers

Translator

About Me

I'm author of History in a Year by the Conservative Voice aka History of the World in a Year by the Conservative Voice.

I'm the Conservative Voice.

I'm looking to make contact with those who might use my skill.

I have an m-audio mobile pre amp fed by the audiotechnica 2041sp condensor mic pack. Prior to 15/4/06, I'd used a Shure sm-58 that required a nuclear blast to register a sound or the internal mic of my aged imac, which has a penchance to recording my breathing. I also used a Griffin itrip, until the community convinced me it was not hiding my talent as well as the other mics.

I am a Writer and an occasional Math Teacher (Sir, what's the occasion?). I like to sing, having no instrumental talent (cannot even clap in time, and yes, I'm aware singing badly IS obnoxious).

I have performed the finale to Les Miserables before an audience of 500. I have also sung before a similar audience (students, parents) renditions of 'I Will' (Beatles), 'Mr Cairo' (Jon Vangelis) and 'I am Australian' (Seekers). Now I seek another profession because the audience hates me ..