Chair Olson noted that the following are consent items and will
not be discussed in detail unless requested by the Commissioners
or members of the audience.

1. BRIANNA LANE/SURI TRAIL STREET NAME CHANGE (#98-0S1213):

PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 26, 27 AND 34-08-70 AT THE MOUTH
OF

RIST CANYON ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 52E

This is a request to name two internal roads Brianna Lane and
Suri Trail within a new development of 35-acre lots to be known
as Cloudy Pass. Staff findings include: 1) Unique street names
are important and needed to accommodate addressing of each dwelling.
Having specific street names within this subdivision and area
will reduce confusion in locating specific addresses; 2) No objections
to the proposed application or names proposed were received; 3)
The proposed street name change will simply eliminate new addresses
on County Road 52E, allowing individual addresses within the development
area; 4) The County Health and Engineering Department, and all
utility and emergency service providers in this area, reviewed
the proposed street name changes and stated no objections.
The staff recommendation is that the street names "Brianna
Lane" and "Suri Trail", as illustrated on attachments
in the staff report, be approved for the Cloudy Pass development.

2. CUSHMAN'S LAKEVIEW DEVELOPMENT 2ND FILING - LOTS 23-25
&

102 AMENDED PLAT (#98-SA1214): SW 1/4 31-07-69 - 4312
AND 4332

EDITH DRIVE IN FORT COLLINS; 1.9 ACRES; 4 LOTS; O-OPEN
ZONING

This is a request for an Amended Plat to consolidate four lots
into two lots. Staff findings are: 1) The proposed Amended
Plat is in compliance with the Larimer County Master Plan, the
Larimer County Zoning Resolution, and the Larimer County Subdivision
Resolution; 2) The Amended Plat is compatible with other development
in the surrounding area; 3) Approval of the Amended Plat will
not result in any significant impacts to neighboring properties,
the natural environment, or the provision of services and infrastructure;
4) Property values in the surrounding area would not be adversely
affected by the Amended Plat. The staff recommendation is for
approval of the Cushman's Lakeview Development 2nd Filing, Lots
23, 24, 25 & 102 Amended Plat.

3. CUSHMAN'S LAKEVIEW DEVELOPMENT 1ST FILING, LOTS 11 &
12

AMENDED PLAT (#98-SA1215): SW 1/4 31-07-69 - ANN STREET
IN

FORT COLLINS; .67 ACRES; 2 LOTS; O-OPEN ZONING

This is a request for an Amended Plat to consolidate two lots
into one. Staff findings include: 1) The proposed Amended Plat
is in compliance with the Larimer County Master Plan, the Larimer
County Zoning Resolution and the Larimer County Subdivision Resolution;
2) The Amended Plat is compatible with other development in the
surrounding area; 3) Approval of the Amended Plat will not result
in any significant impacts to neighboring properties, the natural
environment, or the provision of services and infrastructure;
4) Property values in the surrounding area would not be adversely
affected by the Amended Plat. The staff recommendation is for
approval of the Cushman's Lakeview Development 1st Filing, Lots
11 & 12 Amended Plat.

4. MARSH ESTATES REVISED PRELIMINARY RURAL LAND PLAN

(#97-EX1004): 06-08-68 & 01-08-69 - 2 MILES NORTH
OF THE INTER-

SECTION OF COUNTY ROAD 15 AND COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 1,

7480 NORTH COUNTY ROAD 15; 350 ACRES; 20 LOTS; O-OPEN ZONING

This is a request to divide 350 acres into 20 single-family residential
lots of approximately 3-5 acres each with the remaining land,
approximately 270 acres protected in perpetuity as agricultural
open space. The Rural Land Use Board, Director and Staff findings
are: The Revised Preliminary Rural Land Use Plat proposal is consistent
with the policies of the Rural Land Use Process: 1) The project's
revised financial analysis supports the five additional single-family
residential home sites; 35 single-family residential units possible
under the current O-Open zoning of the property, the density and
proximity of the residential development immediately to the south.
The premium paid for lakeside residential lots and the general
development pressure within the immediate area, especially use-by-right
35-acre division of land, support our believe that this is an
appropriate project, within both the spirit and letter of the
Rural Land Use Process; 2) The commitment to tie a significant
water right, the Gray Seepage Ditch (adjudicated for 3.67 cfs,
1918), to the residual (agricultural) land in perpetuity; 3) The
percentage of the project's land protected as open space: 77%
compared to the required 67%; 4) The applicants' planning and
design rationale for the location of the project's residential
units in order to protect the viability of their existing farm
operation and to protect the wildlife habitat dependent on access
to the adjacent reservoirs. The proposed plan considers the
various land development and design options, particularly the
35-acre alternative, for which there is no County review; 5) The
plan's compatibility with the existing neighboring land uses;
6) A RLUP final fee of $850.00 will be collected for each new
dwelling unit constructed at the time of building permit issuance;
a note to this effect to be placed on the plat; 7) Larimer County
Park Fee will be revised to reflect 19 additional residential
units; the park fee current at the time of building permit issuance
shall apply.

The recommendation of the Rural Land Use Director, Board and Staff
is for approval of the Marsh Estates Revised Preliminary Rural
Land Plan, with the following conditions to be met prior to approval
of the Final Plat: 1) Approval of final engineering designs, including
design of utilities, roads, ROW dedication, and stormwater plan,
before Final Plat submittal; 2) Preliminary soil testing to demonstrate
soil suitability for on-site septic systems; 3) Protective covenant
(in perpetuity) and management plan review and approval before
Final Plat; 4) Review and approval of final development agreement
by County Attorney; 5) Review and approval by County Attorney
of legal documentation attaching Gray Seepage Ditch water rights
to residual land in perpetuity to be used for irrigation; 6) The
following notes shall also be included on the Final Plat: a) Mosquitoes:
The County does not have a mosquito control program; any spraying
or other control will be the responsibility of the property owners;
b) Wildlife: Wildlife such as skunks, snakes, and prairie dogs
occur more frequently than in more built-up areas. Lot owners
should be aware of these occurrences. The County is not able
to mitigate nuisances if they develop, although information on
managing these issues is available. The County does not perform
prairie dog control, but can advise owners on how to obtain the
services of licensed firms that do; it does monitor prairie dog
colonies for evidence of plague. Animal control requirements
for both dogs and cats should be observed; c) Adjacent agricultural
uses: Farming practices on this and adjacent properties can
produce odors, noise and dust. These are a normal part of agriculture
and should be expected to occur; d) Horse pasture management:
If livestock is to be kept on the smaller parcels, the owners
must be aware that lots of this size must be managed very carefully
in order to maintain grass cover in the pasture; e) Engineered
footing and foundations shall be required on all structures; f)
The results of a radon detection test conducted in new dwellings
once the structure is enclosed but prior to issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy shall be submitted to the Planning Department.
As an alternative, a builder may present a prepaid receipt for
a radon tester which specifies that a test will be done within
30 days. A permanent Certificate of Occupancy can be issued
when the prepaid receipt is submitted; g) Road fees shall be paid
at the time of building permit, if determined applicable by the
Engineering Department; h) Park fees shall be paid at the time
of building permit issuance; i) RLUP fees shall be paid at the
time of building permit issuance; j) A fire hydrant with a minimum
fire flow of 500 gallons per minute from a sustainable water supply
on a minimum 6-inch water line or fire sprinkling of the
homes is required by Poudre Fire Authority. The selected method
of fire protection shall be adequately indicated on the Final
Plat; 7) Homeowners' covenants, including architectural controls,
will be reviewed prior to final approval; 8) The applicants agree
to provide sales and other information to the Rural Land Use Center
Director as necessary to insure that monitoring of the incentives
can be conducted; 9) Owner or real estate professional shall provide
purchasers of residential lots and the Farm with Code of the West
at time of real estate closing.

M O T I O N

Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
adopt the staff findings and the recommendations of Staff, the
Rural Land Use Center Director and RLUC Board and approve the
Briana Lane/Suri Trail Street Name Change (#98-OS1213); Cushman's
Lakeview Development 2nd Filing, Lots 23-25 & 102 Amended
Plat (#98-SA1214); Cushman's Lakeview Development 1st Filing,
Lots 11 &12 Amended Plat (#97-EX1215) and the Marsh Estates
Revised Preliminary Rural Land Plan (#97-EX1004); each, with the
conditions as outlined.

Motion carried 3 - 0.

5. POLICY DECISION REGARDING APPEALS FROM THE MINOR

RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (#93-RA0202):

The Board of County Commissioners is considering the possibility
of no longer allowing appeals of the Minor Residential Development
criteria only as these criteria apply to parcels of 35 acres of
more. Ms. Michels noted for the record that the Board of County
Commissioners would like to eliminate the appeal process for property
that was created by the State law's "35 acre" parcel
exception provision; if adopted, the Board would no longer allow
appeals to be made on a parcel of land created after 1972 by the
provisions of the State law that allows parcels of 35 acres or
more to be created without County review and approval. Ms. Michels
continued that this proposed change in policy is not a change
to the existing regulation; the policy was implemented in 1993
to allow persons to make an appeal to the Board for unusual circumstances
on their property to be allowed to submit an MRD for review if
they could not meet six criteria, and the appeal process was intended
to provide a transition for persons who had planned to make an
application but were unable to submit the application prior to
the amendments made to the Subdivision Resolution. Ms. Michels
stated that five (5) years have passed since the amendment was
made to the resolution and the Board believes that is adequate
time for transitioning into the new regulations.

Questions from the Board and discussion followed; the Board noted
that this action will encourage people to go through the Rural
Land Use Process.

Staff findings include: 1) The Minor Residential Development regulation
changed eligibility requirements in 1993; 2) Appeals to this regulation
have routinely been heard since 1993; 3) Using the Minor Residential
Development process on property that has already been granted
an exemption (or made into parcels of 35 acres or more) effectively
gives those property owners a double exemption; 4) Creating 35-acre
parcels without County review detrimentally effects land and the
provision of County services; 5) Elimination of MRD appeals for
parcels larger than 35 acres created after May 5, 1972, will not
prevent owners of such properties from applying to divide their
property with a Subdivision or Planned Unit Development. The
staff recommendation is for adoption of the Minor Residential
Development Policy change as outlined in an attached resolution,
which will be submitted for the Chair's signature at a later date.

M O T I O N

Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the policy decision regarding appeals from the Minor Residential
Development regulations concerning criteria for 35-acre parcels.

Motion carried 3 - 0.

Ms. Michels suggested that a copy of the above-mentioned resolution
be included in the MRD packet when presented; Commissioner Disney
suggested that Ms. Michels also prepare a one-paragraph summary
of the resolution to be made a part of the packet. Commissioner
Clarke recommended that information explaining the Rural Land
Use Process should also be included.

The meeting recessed at 3:20 p.m.

PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING HIGHWAY 1

INTERSECTION MODIFICATIONS

(#318 @ 1500 & #319)

The Board of County Commissioners reconvened at 7:00 p.m. at Eyestone
Elementary School in Wellington, Colorado for a Public Hearing
regarding modifications to the Highway 1 intersection. Chair
Olson presided and Commissioners Clarke and Disney were present.
Also present were Marc Engemoen, Director of Public Works;
Brian Fraaken, Project Engineer; and Jeff Kuhlman, Colorado Department
of Transportation Regional Traffic Engineer. Recording Clerk,
Sherry Graves.

Mr. Engemoen reviewed the status of the budget for the Road and
Bridge Department for road construction and maintenance in Larimer
County; he noted that several years ago, it was ascertained that
approximately $200,000,000 was needed for transportation improvements
in the County and virtually all of the Road and Bridge Department's
current budget is needed just to maintain the existing 1100 mile
road system and only a very small amount ($50,000 to $100,000
annually) is available for capital improvements, such as improving
safety problems. Mr. Engemoen stated that when an opportunity
presents itself to use a grant from the State, or money from a
developer, to make improvements, they try to take advantage of
that opportunity. He noted that last year, the Colorado Department
of Transportation (CDOT) approached them about doing some paving
work on the county roads around Highway 1 as they knew there was
an existing problem out there in terms of traffic accidents and
the dangerous access onto Highway 1 from County Roads 9 and 15.
Mr. Engemoen reviewed several charts showing what the situation
was before with 4 access points onto Highway 1 at each intersection;
he noted that it was decided that in order to improve safety,
it would be better to consolidate those access points and have
one single 90-degree intersection and add left turn lanes. Mr.
Engemoen stated that he didn't fully appreciate that these intersections
were used by large farm equipment and they thought the citizens
would be very happy with the modifications; he noted that there
was a lack of communication with the citizens and during the past
two months they have tried to correct that by having several several
public meetings and they have listened to the concerns and they
are proposing some additional changes with the limited funds available.
Mr. Engemoen stated that they have put in some intersection
approach signs, crossing signs, more delineation, reflectors,
and removed barricades to make the intersection more visable and
he thinks it is a lot less confusing; he noted that they have
also looked at what additional improvements should be made to
address the concerns regarding accelerating and decelerating off
the highway. Mr. Engemoen stated that the recommendation to
the Board tonight is for approval to add right turn lanes and
transition lanes for vehicles turning onto the highway to give
them more opportunity for acceleration onto Highway 1 at each
intersection, which will also provide more room in the intersections
to accommodate turning movements of larger vehicles, he noted
that these improvements will cost $33,000, which will be shared
with CDOT. Mr. Engemoen stated that without spending $1,000,000
for reconstruction of Highway 1, there is not much they can do
about the steep cross slope. Mr. Engemoen stated that to put
the intersection back the way it was, which is being requested
by many of the residents in the area, would cost $52,000 and they
don't believe that would address the important safety concerns.

At this time the hearing was opened for public comment and the
following persons addressed the Board with their concerns: Wilda
Black, Del Black, JoAnn Balen, Jane Hale, Steve Goodwin, Dale
Sipes, Loren Maxey, Ralph Houdeshell, Gloria Boresen, Bob Craft,
and Janice Sipes. These citizens suggested other possibilities
for Engineering to consider which, in their opinion, would improve
the situation; they noted that what is being proposed is only
a bandaid solution to a big problem. Ms. Hale suggested that
instead of having all white reflectors, that there be some colored
ones with different colors on each side of the road. Mr. Goodwin
stated he has been traveling this road since 1916 and what has
been done by the government has made it worse than ever and he
would like to see it put back the way it was and will even take
up a collection to pay for it; he suggested that farmers with
common sense should be consulted before major road changes are
made. Mr. Goodwin did express appreciation for the road improvements
made on the Buckeye Road. Mr. Maxey described the difficulty
of beet trucks entering Highway 1 and said that comparing $30,000
to $50,000 is not an important factor when considering lives saved;
he requested the Board leave CR 9 open both ways. Mr. Houdeshell
gave an example of the slope at CR 15 and Highway 1; he noted
he had an accident at that site and got out of his car and slid
to the other side of the road as the slope of the curve is 49
inches. Ms. Boresen stated that she appreciates the barricades
being removed because they were confusing; however, she noted
that what has been done has created a funnel and traffic jam at
the intersection and she would like to see it put back the way
it was. Mr. Craft noted that the majority of the accidents were
coming off Highway 1 to enter CR 9 because it was not marked well
and he stated that CR 15 should never have been closed. Ms.
Sipes stated that the accidents occurred because people couldn't
see to get off the road - CR 9 was not the problem, it was the
bank of the curve and lack of reflectors and signs. Mr. Sipes
stated that he talked to accident victims and they said there
was not enough signage for safe access onto CR 9.

Mr. Engemoen stated that he appreciates the concerns about the
conflicts with vehicles not having enough room to make their turns
to enter Highway 1 and that is why they are proposing to widen
the lanes, but he is not convinced that leaving CR 9 open is the
answer because of the speeds that people travel. With regard
to reflectors, Mr. Kuhlman stated that he can put in some red
ones to help the situation; he noted that the slope of Highway
1 was built that way because originally this road was an expressway
between Fort Collins and Wellington and it would cost $1,000,000
to take out the curves. Commissioner Disney stated that they
are about to start an update of the Upper Front Range Plan and
he wondered if straightening these curves should be on the list
for prioritization; he noted that safety is the biggest rate factor
in the criteria used for prioritizing projects.

At this time the public hearing was closed and opened for Commissioners'
comments: Commissioner Clarke stated that he has listened to
the comments of the citizens and the suggestions from staff
and he weighed whether they should make it easier for the beet
trucks to go north by leaving CR 9 open or safer for the people
going south by leaving it closed and, in his opinion, it is best
to make it safer for those going south; he agreed that the bank
of the road is ridiculous but there is no immediate affordable
solution to fix the curve. Commissioner Clarke stated that this
is an unbelievable, complicated situation and the County should
have discussed it with the citizens traveling the road before
making any improvements, but there is no way to put everything
back the way it was; he concurred that saving lives is important
and in his judgement, 90-degree intersections are the safest and
he thinks the solution staff has presented is the best solution.
Commissioner Disney stated that he concurs with Commissioner
Clarke and the Engineering staff that a 90-degree intersection
is preferable in terms of safety; he proposed that the proposed
improvements be considered as temporary improvements and that
a project description be written for inclusion in the Upper Front
Range Plan for permanent improvements to address the super bank
of the road. Commissioner Disney said he will take the project
description to the Transportation Planning Council and fight for
the money because he knows that the traffic is only going to increase
on Highway 1 and it is a safety situation that needs to be addressed;
he also stated that he will talk to CDOT about these curves getting
top priority for sanding during storms and he suggested that these
improvements be completed by harvest time. Chair Olson stated
that she has had many calls from people saying "Thank You"
for the improvements which have been made because they feel safer
on the roads now; she noted that she also supports going for a
long-term solution.

M O T I O N

Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
accept the recommendation of the Engineering staff as proposed
tonight as a temporary solution to a long-term problem, directed
Mr. Engemoen to work with Mr. Kuhlman to prepare a project description
so appropriate permanent improvements can be considered by the
Upper Front Range Planning Process, requested that sanding on
Highway 1 during snow storms be made a top priority, and, if
at all possible, strive to have these improvements completed
by harvest time.

Motion carried 3 - 0.

Commissioner Disney suggested that after these temporary improvements
are made, that staff observe how they work and then decide what
additional improvements are needed before the project description
is written.

1. OPEN SESSION FOR PUBLIC COMMENT: Laura Stone, Executive
Director of the Larimer Land Trust, provided some background information
on the Larimer Land Trust; she noted that the Land Trust was founded
in 1993 by a group of citizens concerned about the rapidly disappearing
open lands in Larimer County; it became a non-profit organization
in 1995. Ms. Stone continued that so far the Land Trust has
protected 800 acres of agriculture land, wildlife habitat, wetlands,
open space, and scenic views primarily using conservation easements;
currently they are working on 600 additional easements for 1200
acres and in December they received a $30,000 grant from GOCO
to expand their services in the community and increase their effectiveness
as a land conservation organization. Ms. Stone informed the
Board that they have started a conservation resource center for
the public to learn more about conservation easements. Ms. Stone
invited the Board to their open house this Thursday from 3 until
7 p.m.

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR WEEK OF APRIL 6, 1998:

M O T I O N

Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the Minutes for the week of April 6, 1998, as submitted.

Motion carried 3 - 0.

3. APPROVAL OF SCHEDULE FOR WEEK OF APRIL 20, 1998:

M O T I O N

Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the Schedule for the week of April 20, 1998, as submitted
and revised.

Motion carried 3 - 0.

4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA:

M O T I O N

Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the following documents as listed on the Consent Agenda
for Document Review on April 14, 1998:

an addition and remodel of the kitchen and location
& expanded laundry)

A98-57 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY

COMMISSIONERS AND FANCH CABLEVISION OF COLORADO

(Renewal of Cable Services)

A98-58 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY

COMMISSIONERS AND CABLE SYSTEMS, INC. (Same
as above)

R98-63z FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PETITION OF

HARVEST FARM TO AMEND A SPECIAL REVIEW

Motion carried 3 - 0.

5. APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR AURORA HILLS SUBDIVISION:
Monica Sweere, applicant for the Aurora Hills Subdivision, was
present for the signing of the Final Plat for the Aurora Hills
Subdivision.

M O T I O N

Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the Final Plat for the Aurora Hills Subdivision, and authorize
the Chair to sign same.

Motion carried 3 - 0.

6. UPDATE ON BOYD LAKE STATE PARK: Mr. Will submitted
the Boyd Lake State Park Annual Report and reviewed the highlights
of same; he noted that the purchase of the Heinrichy property,
which is 30 acres located between the Park and the City of Loveland's
Seven Lakes Park, was finalized in February. Mr. Will reviewed
the possible funding sources for the potential purchase of the
Hirsch property north of Boyd Lake.

7. PROCLAMATION FOR CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS WEEK:

M O T I O N

Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
proclaim the week of April 19-25, 1998 as Crime Victims' Rights
Week and authorize the Chair to sign same.

Motion carried 3 - 0.

8. DISCUSSION OF CAR REPAIR AND TRANSPORTATION NEEDS FOR
TANF CLIENTS: Ms. Friedman stated that the purpose for meeting
with the Board today is to obtain support and direction from them
regarding a possible solution to transportation problems for welfare
participants; she noted that ETS would like to explore the possibility
of purchasing services from fleet management to repair participant's
cars, develop a car donation program in conjunction with the existing
program of Project Self-Sufficiency (PSS), and coordinate with
PSS on a car maintenance program. Ms. Friedman briefly described
the three programs; she noted that previously when recipients
had car problems, they could be exempted from work programs, but
now transportation problems can no longer be used as a excuse
for not getting to work. Ms. Friedman stated that they approached
Fleet Management and they said they can help with this issue and
not impinge on their other duties for the County. Discussion
ensued regarding the impact this proposal would have on the private
sector, liability and insurance, participants' accountability,
etc. The Board expressed appreciation for the two departments
working together and they indicated their support for the program.

Ms. Friedman took this opportunity to inform the Board that as
they strive to meet their accountable work goals, they are starting
to work with more of the individuals that are in long-term education
programs and they are now having to seek work activity of 25 hours
per week to keep their benefits, and some of them are not very
happy.

9. CONFLICT RESOLUTION FACILITATION PROGRAM: Mr. Gluckman
discussed the implementation of a program which will address and
resolve moderate as well as difficult, long-term, and intractable
organizational and community conflicts; he noted that the program
will consist of certified staff facilitators that will help parties
in conflict focus on the issues and create solutions that are
acceptable to all sides. Mr. Gluckman stated that the recommendation
before the Board today is to create a comprehensive conflict resolution
facilitation program to train 6 to 10 county staff in the art
of successful conflict and mediation resolution facilitation;
he continued that potential facilitators will be trained and certified
by professional trainers who will develop the course. Mr. Gluckman
reviewed the recommendations for the Larimer County Conflict Resolution
Program and the estimated program budget; he noted that the training
should be a week-long session and he recommended staff receive
incentive pay. Mr. Gluckman stated that the trained staff would
be required to do a minimum of ten hours for the County each year;
he noted he would like to start a pilot program this summer and
will work in partnership with the City of Fort Collins as an enhancement
to what they are doing in this endeavor and may be able to apply
for some joint funding. Mr. Gluckman noted that the program
will require a front-end cost of training, but in the long run
it will save the County money because outside facilitators will
not have to be hired. Commissioner Clarke stated that if we are
going to train these people, he wants them to have some commitment
to Larimer County.

10. ADDITIONAL SECRETARY FOR THE RURAL LAND USE CENTER (RLUC):
Mr. Reidhead requested Board approval to hire a Secretary II
(regular 1.0 FTE) and allow the RLUC to transfer operating funds
to fund this position; he informed the Board that they have been
surprised with all the interest they have had in the program.
Mr. Reidhead stated that one of the RLUC's biggest assets are
their people and for the long-term benefit for the program, they
need some help and they need it quickly; he noted that it is in
the long-term best interst not to hire a temporary employee because
of all the training requirements. Mr. Reidhead stated that the
fee schedule is in place and they are recouping expenses from
application and hearing fees; he noted that the big income will
come from the building permits and those are hard to anticipate
because of the length of time involved. Commissioner Disney stated
that he thinks monies for the Rural Land Use Center should be
included in the new Open Lands Initiative in the future.

M O T I O N

Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the request to hire one full-time (FTE) Secretary II for
the Rural Land Use Center.

Motion carried 3 - 0.

11. APPOINTMENT OF NEW COUNTY ENGINEER: Mr. Engemoen
requested Board approval to appoint Mark R. Peterson to the position
of County Engineer; he reviewed Mr. Peterson's background and
stated that he thinks the Board will be delighted with him - he
noted that his consulting qualifications are in real demand.

M O T I O N

Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the appointment of Mark R. Peterson to the position of
County Engineer and adopt a resolution authorizing same.

Motion carried 3 - 0.

R98-64g RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE COUNTY ENGINEER FOR

LARIMER COUNTY

The Board complimented Mr. Engemoen for the impressive presentation
he made at the meeting in Wellington on Monday night regarding
the proposed improvements to Highway 1; they suggested that he
would be an excellent candidate for the Larimer County Facilitation
Program.

12. WORKSESSION:

-- Nurse Practioner for the Health Department: Mr.
Lancaster stated that the Health Department has found a nurse
practioner they would like to hire for the Reproductive Health
Program; he noted that there are 1 or 2 positions that are really
hard to fill in the County and Nurse Practioner is one of them
because there is such a high demand for that high level of nursing
skill. Mr. Lancaster reviewed the qualifications of the person
considering the position and he noted that under current policy,
we would have to hire her at Step E and she is already making
$7 more than our Step E; however, she has agreed that if we will
go to Step M., she will take the job - which is still $3.50 less
than her current salary. Mr. Lancaster recommended that the
Board approve the hiring of a Nurse Practioner at Grade 156 at
Step M; he noted that the funding would come from within the program,
which is grant funded.

M O T I O N

Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the hiring of a Nurse Practioner at Grade 156 at Step
M for the Reproductive Health Program, as requested.

Motion carried 3 - 0.

-- County Seat for a Day in Wellington: Ms. LaRue submitted
a flyer announcing County Seat for a Day in Wellington next Tuesday,
April 21, 1998. Ms. LaRue also informed the Board about the
Arbor Day Tree Give-Away on Friday; it was noted that the trees
were purchased with funds received from the sale of computer paper
for recycling.

-- CCI Conference in June: Mr. Lancaster informed
the Board that the Summer CCI Conference will be held in Crested
Butte the week of June 8 through 11, 1998.

-- The Board provided an update for Mr. Lancaster on the Monday
night meeting on the proposed improvements to the Highway 1 intersection
and again re-emphasized what a great presentation Mr. Engemoen
made before the citizens.

.

14. EXECUTIVE SESSION - WORKERS' COMPENSATION SETTLEMENT:

M O T I O N

Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
go into Executive Session with Ms. Tremblay at 11:30 to discuss
a Workers' Compensation settlement.

Motion carried 3 - 0.

The Executive Session ended at 11:35 a.m. and the Board took the
following action:

M O T I O N

Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve a Worker's Compensation full and final settlement in the
amount of $75,000 to be paid to Fred Rosenberg.