There have been systematic negations of women’s rights, although the state has given various symbolic or substantive gestures of gender justice

After availing themselves to much media manipulation and to political machinations, women in Egypt are back in a very familiar place and one where they have been before. The state is paying lip service to their rights but dismantling their abilities to mobilise.

Women are present but in retreat! By women, I mean the women’s movement. By retreat I refer to the deflation of a dynamism that saw women contesting, protesting, challenging and forming alliances and its replacement with a rather flaccid support for a strong state that is the champion and protector of women.

The state has delivered on many of its promises to women. The creation of specialist anti-harassment units in the Ministry of Interior was in response to a women’s movement lobby and is an important step towards safer streets.

The president spoke out against sexual harassment by visiting one of the savagely attacked victims during the presidential election celebrations and urged the government to issue a harsh harassment law. By so doing he became the first head of state to recognise and condemn such savage attacks. But there have also been other gains made on behalf of women.

The quota for women in local councils is perhaps the most significant attainment realised by women and one that can potentially change the political structures of Egypt. The 2014 constitution mandates the election of at least 13,000 thousand women to local councils.

At a more symbolic level we find more gains. The Ministry of Justice has recently appointed a female deputy minister and has confirmed the entry of women into the judiciary in response to long standing demands from women’s groups.

Women have also been celebrated as the loyal and trustworthy allies of the state. They stood firm against ‘ikhwanisation’ (Muslim Brotherhood influence) and mobilised in their millions to approve the constitution of 2014 and vote for the current president and as such are lauded and celebrated, or at least some of them are!

On the other hand and in contrast to symbolic or substantive gestures of gender justice, there have been systematic negations of women’s rights. At the formal level, evidence can be found in the neglect of the National Council for Women. The term of the current council ended in March 2015. The deliberations for selecting a new national council for women have taken place in closed circles and have not yet yielded a new council.

The council is comprised of a head and 29 members. The selection of these women and men is happening through personal nominations of ‘trusted insiders’ and filtered through the routine and excessive security and executive checks. There may well be 30 amazing people who have been selected but the process by which this organ of state feminism is being built is essentially antithetical to the idea of accountable, representative or transparent national machinery.

Meanwhile, women’s organisations have suffered as collateral damage as a result of the stringent civil society restrictions and regulations that have targeted human rights work. Their ability to organise and mobilise is curtailed and their funds have been diminished. Women in political parties who were instrumental in organising the 30th of June 2015 demonstrations and sit- ins are also challenged by the dysfunctional state of their parties.

Women have been here before! A century ago women began to mobilise and form a united front to gain basic rights but it was the post 1952 revolution regime that gave them these rights as a presidential gift and not in response to political pressure. Once again, the state is recognising some rights of women but curtailing the ability of a women’s movement to make claims or to pressure for change or recognition.

Once again the state is approaching issues of gender justice and of women’s rights as a set of formal or institutional arrangements that are peppered with slogans and symbolic gestures.

Egypt may well have a 30 member NCW, a women’s department in the police force, 13,000 women elected as local council members, a few female judges, a lot of lip service being paid to the “Great Egyptian Woman”, and some prominent women who are present in the public sphere and who use themselves as evidence of the high regard in which women are held by polity and by society. But none of these structures or symbols will matter if there isn’t a vibrant, veritable and free movement to guard any gains, hold power to account and represent the interests and realities of women.

The state cannot be a substitute for society or expropriate civil space in the name of paternalism or protection. The National Council for women is not a proxy for women as a whole. It is simply a machinery dedicated to the cause of gender equality and not a tool to sequester women’s voices.

Hopefully the new council will honour this responsibility and build on the strong voice and presence of the current (and now elapsed) NCW leadership.

The writer is an associate professor at the American University in Cairo's Social Research Center.

Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code

We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements,
slander and personal attacks against any person/s.

We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial
or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.

We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal
attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing
writers.

We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling
and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will
not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

Please Wait

2

Butros HANNA

01-10-2015 07:36am

0-

3+

Women in Egypt

I visited Cairo in August after a long absence and I was shocked to see the number of veiled women even among the educated classes.
In 1923 HODA SHARAAWI Hanem, the daughter of SHAARAWI PASHA a rich Muslim landowner and prime minister, was returning from Paris with a delegation of 12 women where they attended an international conference. They were met at the Bab El-Hadid Railway Station by reporters from all the local Arabic, English, French, and Greek newspapers.
HODA SHARAAWI, in a gesture of defiance, removed the veil that covered her hair only; her companions quickly joined her and removed theirs.
And now, ninety years later, it is depressing to see the daughters of one of the oldest civilizations emulating the daughters of the bedouins of the Arabian Gulf and cover their faces with nikabs.
Is there Saudi gold that is affecting our Egyptian civilization, our way of life, our culture of tolerance?

Email

Name

Comment's Title

Comment

Please Wait

1

Tut

14-09-2015 12:59pm

0-

6+

Biggest contribution for Egyptian Women

No one would argue that Egyptian women, as most Arab women, don’t have a fair shot in our region. Many socio-economic experts come up with research, studies, and recommendations on how to change that. Nevertheless the situation will not change unless and until Egyptian women start a serious movement of “one child per family” they should be the champions of this urgently needed movement in Egypt. If not, the population will explode, resources with shrink, and both Egyptian women and men won’t have the luxury of promoting equality because they will be struggling to feed themselves and their kids. If Egyptian women wants fairness and equality; they need to start with themselves, control the unsustainable birth rates, say no to 3,4,5 kids; have only one child. Then we can all (men & women) chart a new course of prosperity, development, and fairness. Till then, it’s all wishful thinking, unfortunately!