This is why Russia Today gets nothing but contempt from me. You can see exactly why in that short 'debate', but for academic reasoning: Why was Go-Cheeze given a background setting and professional set & camera time while Donchured-Onme was hollering into a Walmart webcam like a drunk. Which of the two in your opinion was 'briefed' and who do you think was payed to represent?

Cant wait till someone with a very loud voice and rich pals in the media ring questions why a self identified Russian network broadcasts in English and not the 'mother tongue' and why it gets in the front row on non Russian issues.

I am going down town today, Phoenix, and I am going to tell whoever will hear my words the above sentament.

"I could care less who was here first, the truth of the matter is Whites built this Nation with their money, sweat, blood and lives. You migrants just came along for the ride..." DESERTFOX63

That has worked for the past decade. However if you notice the new Aztlan-La Raza signs say "we were here first, go home".

That carefully crafted propaganda line came from Jew Central.

Why? Because it's crafting a line of thought, which to the disengaged masses who see the tv and print media, that don't feel the Mestizo violence firsthand, that the Mestizos have a legitimate moral right to the land.

1) The Spanish pillaged all they could (e.g. gold, silver, copper) from the Americas for hundreds of years. Rather than establish trading states, as did the Dutch and British elsewhere, they sent all the riches back to Spain.

2) The mestizos have an entire continent to the south of them; but they want the land to the north.

3) Napoleon put the Spanish Empire on its head, opening the way to revolution in the so-called Latin Americas. What happened to the liberal revolutionary Simon Bolivar?

4) The mestizos and others of Spanish and mixed Spanish descent had opportunity from Mexico to Cape Horn to establish their own sucesses.

Whites were in Americas first. We own it. We didn't "take" it from any human. We were the first humans in North America.

Is wrong based on ownership land claims? Is not right judged based on who owns the property, that is, who was occupying it first?

Clovis, New Mexico is one of the oldest Solutrean flint blades.

MICHAEL COLLINS (University of Texas): The whole question of the peopling of the Americas is a huge piece of the total human experience. That's just a question we can't leave unanswered.

NARRATOR: Who were these earliest explorers? Where did they come from? How did they make this epic journey to the New World?

The first clue to the mystery was found in a dried up lake in Clovis, New Mexico. Here, in 1933, archaeologists uncovered a stone tool made by human hands, an ancient spearhead. It became known as the Clovis point.

Alongside the Clovis point was the skeleton of a mammoth, which, evidently, the spear point had been used to kill. Later, scientists were able to date the bones, establishing the age of the spearhead as 13,500 years old. It made the Clovis point the oldest human artifact ever found in America. Archaeologists have now discovered thousands of Clovis spear points across much of the continent.

MICHAEL COLLINS: There's Clovis in every one of the 48 states in the United States, Mexico, Belize, Costa Rica, in all kinds of environments.

Clovis, New Mexico, USA, has been White Race owned for 24,000 years. Get out of our land Asiatic Mexicans. The Southwest has always been White. Go home to Asia you Mexicans.

First time I disagree with you.

Taking land by force may not always be wrong if taking from an alien people who are unwilling to share space.

Expansion is sometimes necessary. Olden days someone moved in ,traded or conquered and mixed in with the locals. Things are pretty much the same now except some White people are listening to those who are claiming the fantasy of Utopian peaceful world to be possibly if White People are exterminated.

The only people who will find peace will find it in the grave. There is no rest for the living.