Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner arrives at the National Hotel in Havana on January 25, 2014 where she will attend the II Summit of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC). The summit, to be held on January 28-29 in the Cuban capital, will bring together leaders and representatives of all nations from across the Americas (except the United States and Canada) with previous meetings starting on Saturday. (ADALBERTO ROQUE/AFP/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON — Argentines have given so much to the world, yet have so little to show for it.

The second largest country in Latin America has given birth to music (tango), soccer stars (Maradona and Messi) and popular icons (Eva Peron) that have mesmerized the world for decades. Its people are known to be exciting, passionate and predisposed to living in the moment; qualities which endear them to the millions of tourists that grace its shores each year.

Yet despite their penchant for greatness, the Argentine people habitually elect leaders that are not worthy of leadership.

Christina Fernandez de Kirchner is only the latest manifestation of this trend, but even by Argentina’s standards she has raised the bar for poor governance.

Argentina’s economy stands on the brink of collapse after years of mismanagement, with long-term government bond yields of 10.5 percent exceeding those of even governments in crisis such as Greece.

Yet as with past crises, it’s the Argentine middle class that is bearing the brunt of it. Runaway inflation is causing wages to rapidly decline in real terms, while erasing any household savings that have been made in the 8 years since the last crisis.

Most likely a continued focus on the Falkland Islands (known locally as Las Malvinas).

Perhaps the defining legacy of Fernandez de Kirchner’s presidency has been her dogmatic pursuit of “justice” for the Falklands, a collection of islands with a population of 2,932 people–over 99 percent of who voted to remain a British protectorate earlier this year.

Blaming external factors for internal problems is hardly unique to Argentina. It is a deception as old as time, utilized by leaders in countries as diverse as Venezuela, Syria and Uzbekistan. In each case, however, a failure to address the underlying issue begets a failure to solve it.

Regardless of the validity of Argentina’s claim to the Falklands, the country has far greater concerns to tend to, and it’s incumbent upon its leaders to address them.

If they choose to work with the International Monetary Fund, a thawing of relations and a restructuring of its debt is still eminently possible. Moreover, if President Kirchner shows a willingness to uphold the rule of law with regards to foreign investors, Argentina will likely see other multinational corporations follow Chevron’s example in investing heavily in the country, delivering a much-needed boost to the economy.

For their part, the Argentine people must demand these actions of their leaders, something they are beginning to do through strikes and protests.

They would be better served, however, to address their concerns at the ballot box.

President Kirchner’s Front for Victory party suffered heavy defeats in the recent midterm elections, but voters will have to wait until 2015 to elect her successor. If they are wise enough to elect a leader that shuns short-term promises in favor of long-term stability, they will surely be rewarded.

Living in the moment has become a costly endeavor.

Alexander Botting works for the Washington firm of Fabrini and Company, which provides political and business consultation to Clients from Latin America, Europe, Eurasia and Central America. The firm does not do business in Argentina.

GlobalPost Commentary section is dedicated to bringing our audience thoughtful and informed perspectives from around the world. We welcome your participation. If you would like to contribute to our Commentary page, please contact Bob Giles, commentary editor, by clicking on the submission guidelines button below.