I can see why he chose Luck and I think that Luck will be a good quarterback and maybe even have the best career of everyone in this class, but I think Russell Wilson had the most impressive season of all the rookie qbs.

-he finished the season with a 100 passer rating, which would have been a record if RG3 didn't have a passer rating of 102.4

I can see why he chose Luck and I think that Luck will be a good quarterback and maybe even have the best career of everyone in this class, but I think Russell Wilson had the most impressive season of all the rookie qbs.

-he finished the season with a 100 passer rating, which would have been a record if RG3 didn't have a passer rating of 102.4

The notion that Luck was working with less is easily debunked by looking at the facts.

Luck had healthy receivers all year, he had a pro bowl veteran to throw to all season. He had a dynamic rookie WR that broke big gains off of short completions. Despite having the best WR group of the three candidates, he still made the most mistakes. You can't credit a guy for having a bunch of comebacks when he was the reason they were in a hole going into the fourth quarter in the first place. Poor decision making can't be explained away because he has a poor running game, better passers don't throw their first pass of a game directly to a LB for a pick 6. Better passers don't throw into double coverage when other WRs are open.

Wilson outplayed Luck by throwing more touchdowns on fewer attempts, having a better passing rating, all the while working with less talented receiving options.

RG3 outplayed Luck with his #1 WR and #1 TE both missing half the season, mediocre receivers that dropped more passes than Seattle and Indy's receivers. Meanwhile, the defenses fear of the read option allowed a sixth round pick to break the season rushing total in team history, and allowed mediocre talent to get open when they would otherwise remain covered.

To suggest that Luck did more with less, is to ignore stats, ignore what unfolded in the games, ignore the talent he had at WR, and choose the one player who you're least likely to see for the next decade.