It was also during the 1960s that William Rusher, the publisher of National Review, became disappointed with the conservative movement. Buckley, Burnham, Frank Meyer, Whittaker Chambers, and Russell Kirk had books and journals and lectures, but they lacked power. Their conservatism was elitist, pessimistic, grimly witty, and academic. It lionized abstruse philosophers such as Eric Voegelin and Leo Strauss and Richard Weaver. To use a phrase uttered often today, Rusher wondered what conservatism had conserved.” – Mathew Continetti; National Review: Crisis of the Conservative Intellectual.

“The conservation of natural resources is the fundamental problem. Unless we solve that problem, it will avail us little to solve all others.” – Theodore Roosevelt; Address to the Deep Waterway Convention, Memphis; 4 Oct 1907 – Today in Science.

“You have one person in a military organization and typically its the commander. When you look at a combat theater; the overall individual in charge of that combat force is the strategic leader; who within the confines of the policy that is approved by the President of the United States and/or the Nato authorities. He is the one that is developing the direction that the organization is going to go.” -David Petraeus; Four Tasks of a Strategic Leader; Belfer Center.

It was not clear to me listening to the Four Tasks of a strategic military commander would do if they considered fundamental aspects of the ‘confines of the policy’ they were being required to work within; to be flawed. What if the confines of the flawed – total disregard for the conservation of resources – policy are so flawed as to be downright suicidal in terms of the military organization and its civilian leaderships ultimate credibility and nations survival?

I would imagine – of course I could be wrong – that the most effective means of implementing an EoP social contract; is for various intelligence agencies to collectively agree and support the Director of National Intelligence or the Minister of Defence or someone to that effect; to effectively inform the President of the United States of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations as to the necessity.

In a country where citizens are educated at home, church, business, school and universities about the importance of resource conservation; this would obviously be a no-brainer; and the entire country would welcome such visionary and responsible resource conservation leadership; and the ability to patriotically make procreation and consumption sacrifices – particularly if impartially and fairly prosecuted – to cooperatively conserve resources for future generations.

In a country where not enough citizens are educated at home, church, business, school and universities about the importance of resource conservation; military officials concerned about the flaws in their national security strategy’s failure to consider resource conservation as a; if not the fundamental principles of their national security strategy; obviously need to chart their strategic path towards the goal of being a country where citizens are educated at home, church, business, school and universities about the importance of resource conservation.

I imagine that is possibly part of the background process that brought us this far.

The EoP Applicants – ‘strategic path’ as such – as I interpret it – is to do what we can to provide impartial and bipartisan support to all political parties, religions, corporations, etc; their leaders and their followers enabling preferably not one but a few nation’s Minister of Defence – or courts – to collectively inform their President/s of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract.

That would be my working hypothesis conclusion interpretation of figuring out what the informed consent order, should anyone accept it; should be; and that is partially what my Pro EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American; correspondence to Erik is based upon.

“We looked at the problem and thought we’d rather go through Jordan than Baghdad. … It was best captured by a sign on a door of a commander whom I went on patrol with his company; in what used to be a very dangerous part of Iraq and his brigade had done a magnificent job. I remember walking around with no body armour, no kevlar, watched the soccer game, walked through the market, made a few purchases. And we go back to his command post, which was a plywood door in some little makeshift office and there is a sign on it that says: “In the absence of guidance or orders; figure out what they should have been and execute aggressively”. .. I have found that it is the off the wall experiences; that have been the most developing. So when asked what would I advise: Do off the wall stuff” — David Petraeus; American Leadership in the World; Conversations with Bill Kristol.

If my working hypothesis EoP Applicant strategic path order is strategically or tactically faulty; then of course any EoP Applicant should speak up; so that we can amend it.

If however my working hypothesis EoP Applicant strategic path order is reasonably sound; until evidence proves otherwise; then of course EoP Applicants cannot be rushing around advocating that one WiP left/right/white/black wing ‘breeding war fuck resource conservation kamikaze national security’ policy is any different to another WiP right/left/white/black ‘consumption war fuck resource conservation kamikaze national security’ policy.

EoP Applicants should decide whether they wish to be Pro-EoP Applicants; or Pro WiP Americans; whether left or right, white or black, etc. If certain strategists feel its necessary to raise the ‘strategy of tension’ level; that can quite easily be done without favouring one WiP party over another. The focus is about supporting the creation of a strong foundation to enable whomever the President of whichever country is; to be able to ultimately publicly accept the national security military necessity recommendation to embark on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract.

That would be my working hypothesis conclusion interpretation of figuring out what the informed consent order, should anyone accept it; should be; and that is partially what my Pro EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American; correspondence to Erik is based upon.

[…] As noted in EoP correspondence to Erik Prince and David Petraeus; and EoP Applicants: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American; I am a member of an Ecology of Peace culture; I do not vote or support left or right wing, black […]

[…] As noted in EoP correspondence to Erik Prince and David Petraeus; and EoP Applicants: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American; I am a member of an Ecology of Peace culture; I do not vote or support left or right wing, black […]

[…] “We looked at the problem and thought we’d rather go through Jordan than Baghdad. … It was best captured by a sign on a door of a commander whom I went on patrol with his company; in what used to be a very dangerous part of Iraq and his brigade had done a magnificent job. I remember walking around with no body armour, no kevlar, watched the soccer game, walked through the market, made a few purchases. And we go back to his command post, which was a plywood door in some little makeshift office and there is a sign on it that says: “In the absence of guidance or orders; figure out what they should have been and execute aggressively”. .. I have found that it is the off the wall experiences; that have been the most developing. So when asked what would I advise: Do off the wall stuff” — David Petraeus; American Leadership in the World; Conversations with Bill Kristol. — EoP NWO SCO: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American […]

[…] “We looked at the problem and thought we’d rather go through Jordan than Baghdad. … It was best captured by a sign on a door of a commander whom I went on patrol with his company; in what used to be a very dangerous part of Iraq and his brigade had done a magnificent job. I remember walking around with no body armour, no kevlar, watched the soccer game, walked through the market, made a few purchases. And we go back to his command post, which was a plywood door in some little makeshift office and there is a sign on it that says: “In the absence of guidance or orders; figure out what they should have been and execute aggressively”. .. I have found that it is the off the wall experiences; that have been the most developing. So when asked what would I advise: Do off the wall stuff” — David Petraeus; American Leadership in the World; Conversations with Bill Kristol. — EoP NWO SCO: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American […]

[…] As noted in EoP correspondence to Erik Prince and David Petraeus; and EoP Applicants: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American; I am a member of an Ecology of Peace culture; I do not vote or support left or right wing, black […]

[…] As noted in EoP correspondence to Erik Prince andDavid Petraeus; and EoP Applicants: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American; I am a member of an Ecology of Peace culture; I do not vote or support left or right wing, black […]

[…] The EoP Applicants – ‘strategic path’ as such – as I interpret it – is to do what we can to provide impartial and bipartisan support to all political parties, religions, corporations, etc; their leaders and their followers enabling preferably not one but a few nation’s Minister of Defence – or courts – to collectively inform their President/s of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. — EoP NWO SCO: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American. […]

[…] The EoP Applicants – ‘strategic path’ as such – as I interpret it – is to do what we can to provide impartial and bipartisan support to all political parties, religions, corporations, etc; their leaders and their followers enabling preferably not one but a few nation’s Minister of Defence – or courts – to collectively inform their President/s of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. — EoP NWO SCO: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American. […]

[…] The EoP Applicants – ‘strategic path’ as such – as I interpret it – is to do what we can to provide impartial and bipartisan support to all political parties, religions, corporations, etc; their leaders and their followers enabling preferably not one but a few nation’s Minister of Defence – or courts – to collectively inform their President/s of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. — EoP NWO SCO: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American. […]

[…] The EoP Applicants – ‘strategic path’ as such – as I interpret it – is to do what we can to provide impartial and bipartisan support to all political parties, religions, corporations, etc; their leaders and their followers enabling preferably not one but a few nation’s Minister of Defence – or courts – to collectively inform their President/s of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. — EoP NWO SCO: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American. […]

[…] The EoP Applicants – ‘strategic path’ as such – as I interpret it – is to do what we can to provide impartial and bipartisan support to all political parties, religions, corporations, etc; their leaders and their followers enabling preferably not one but a few nation’s Minister of Defence – or courts – to collectively inform their President/s of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. — EoP NWO SCO: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American. […]

[…] The EoP Applicants – ‘strategic path’ as such – as I interpret it – is to do what we can to provide impartial and bipartisan support to all political parties, religions, corporations, etc; their leaders and their followers enabling preferably not one but a few nation’s Minister of Defence – or courts – to collectively inform their President/s of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. — EoP NWO SCO: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American. […]

[…] The EoP Applicants – ‘strategic path’ as such – as I interpret it – is to do what we can to provide impartial and bipartisan support to all political parties, religions, corporations, etc; their leaders and their followers enabling preferably not one but a few nation’s Minister of Defence – or courts – to collectively inform their President/s of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. — EoP NWO SCO: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American. […]

[…] The EoP Applicants – ‘strategic path’ as such – as I interpret it – is to do what we can to provide impartial and bipartisan support to all political parties, religions, corporations, etc; their leaders and their followers enabling preferably not one but a few nation’s Minister of Defence – or courts – to collectively inform their President/s of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. — EoP NWO SCO: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American. […]

[…] The EoP Applicants – ‘strategic path’ as such – as I interpret it – is to do what we can to provide impartial and bipartisan support to all political parties, religions, corporations, etc; their leaders and their followers enabling preferably not one but a few nation’s Minister of Defence – or courts – to collectively inform their President/s of the national security military necessity of embarking on domestic and foreign policy education and negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. — EoP NWO SCO: 22 Oct: D Petraeus, E Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American. […]