Reuters and the Guardian did not (for some reason) feature this photo on their sites. The Jerusalem Post did.

Palestinian demonstrators hurl molotov cocktails at Israeli troops during clashes at a protest against Trump's decision on Jerusalem, in Hebron, in the occupied West Bank March 9, 2018.. (photo credit: MUSSA QAWASMA / REUTERS)

Maybe hurling lit firebombs at IDF soldiers is not such a good idea. Unless you think setting people on fire is a valid form of speech.

Both Reuters and the Guardian have a section called 'Editor's Choice', featuring the pictures they most want you to see. (Obviously this was a Reuters picture, I gave them the credit.) Their propaganda pictures are those they present as 'featured' day after day after day..

Those featured are more for example, like these:
1) All Jews are weirdly dressed freaks

2) All Palestinians are suffering women, wide-eyed children or heroicly posed youths.
A Palestinian woman reacts from tear gas fired by Israeli troops during clashes at a protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's decision on Jerusalem ahead of International Women's Day, in Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank.or in other words, this did not take place during International Women's day, but Reuters thought they'd throw that reference in anyway to gain your sympathy.
Don't you recognize heavy-handed propaganda when you see it?

Quote$tevie
I don't think anybody obsessively picks through the photos on these websites except you.

Nope, nothing of the kind.
Just go to the Reuters.com website and select Pictures Home ( [www.reuters.com] )
Then click on Editor's Choice. The 24 or so pictures they want you to see takes about 4 minutes to go through...if you are slow.
It's a no-brainer, which considering the nastiness of your remark, should suit you fine.