Washington,
D.C. – There are no coincidences when it comes to deep politics.
Regardless of the propaganda operations undertaken to mask the
truth, there is always much more taking place than the general
public is allowed to see. Take for instance the case of poisoned
Russian double agent Col Sergei Skripal.

The
western public has been led by the mass media to believe that
Skripal and his daughter were poisoned by Russia as payback for
his betrayal of Russia. However, a close look at the facts brings
about some astounding conclusions. The poisoning was likely
carried out by western actors operating with an intention to
either scare or kill Skripal after it was revealed that his
handler was one Pablo Miller, an MI6 agent the UK claims is a
diplomat, and who was also a colleague in both MI6 and Orbis
Intelligence of Trump dossier author, Christopher Steele.

It
is important to remember that Orbis Intelligence is Christopher
Steele’s company that was paid by the Clinton campaign to create a
dossier of opposition research that was used as a basis for FISA
warrants on the Trump campaign. In fact, as the New Yorkerreported,
Steele’s position itself within MI6 likely involved direct contact
with Skripal:

“Steele had spent more than
twenty years in M.I.6, most of it focusing on Russia. For three
years, in
the nineties, he spied in Moscow under diplomatic
cover. Between 2006 and 2009, he ran the service’s Russia desk,
at its headquarters, in London. He was fluent in Russian and
widely considered to be an expert on the country.”

Moon
of Alabamareportedthat
“Steele was an MI6 undercover
agent in Moscow around the time when Skripal was recruited and
handed over Russian secrets to the MI6. He also ran the MI6
Russia desk so anything about Skripal will have passed through
him. It is very likely that they personally knew each other.
Pablo Miller, who worked for Steele’s private company, lived in
the same town as Skripal and they seem to have been friends
since Miller had recruited him.”

Orbis
Business Intelligence was co-founded by Steele and would employ
Skripal’s handler, Pablo Miller, as soon as he left MI6.

Further
indicative of something likely suspicious afoot, a D Notice, which
effectively bans British media outlets and journalists from
mentioning Pablo Miller, was put in place on the day of the
Salisbury chemical attack.

Former
British diplomat Craig Murray posted a screenshot of a tweet that
he called a “vital
confirmation from Channel 4 News (serial rebel Alex Thomson) of
the D Notice in place onmentionof
Pablo Miller.”

.

UK government sent out a media suppression instruction
("DMSA notice" aka "D notice") for Skripal's MI6 handler living
nearby according to UK's Channel 4. Skripal's handler was
historically reported to be "Pablo Miller"–more recently
connected to Orbis and Christopher Steele.https://t.co/70ZPJdZtRP

Additionally,
although declining to name him, almost certainly due to the D
Notice, the British Telegraphreportedon
Pablo Miller doing “consultancy
work” for Steele’s Orbis:

A security
consultant who has worked for the company that compiled the
controversial dossier on Donald Trump was close to the Russian
double agent poisoned last weekend, it has been claimed.

The
consultant, who The Telegraph is declining to identify, lived
close to Col Skripal and is understood to have
known him for some time.
…
The Telegraph understands that Col Skripal moved to
Salisbury in 2010 in a spy swap and became
close to a security consultant employed by Christopher
Steele, who compiled the Trump dossier.

The
British security consultant, according to a LinkedIn social
network account that
was removed from the internet in the past few days,
is also based in Salisbury.

On the
same LinkedIn account, the man listed consultancy work with
Orbis Business Intelligence, according to reports.

Clearly,
Miller or someone else attempted to cover up the connection to
Steele by editing his LinkedIn profile. The man that the Telegraph declined to
identify was laternamed by
Meduza as Pablo Miller:

Pablo
Miller, who at the time was posing as Antonio Alvarez de
Hidalgo and working in Britain’s embassy in Tallinn. Russia’s
Federal Security Service says Miller was actually an
undercover MI6 agent tasked with recruiting Russians.

Although
Orbis issued a weak
denial of Skripal’s involvement in producing the
dossier, Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, noted
that it was“extremely
probable”that Skripal’s work on the
Trump/Russia dossier was related to the his poisoning:

Back then
I did not realise what I now know, that the person being
protected was Pablo Miller, colleague in both MI6 then Orbis
Intelligence of Christopher Steele, author of the
fabrications of the Trump/Russia golden shower
dossier. That the government’s very first act on the poisoning
was to ban all media mention of Pablo Miller makes it
extremely probable that this whole incident is related to the
Trump dossier and that Skripal had worked on it, as I
immediately suspected. The most probable cause is that Skripal
– who you should remember had traded the names of Russian
agents to Britain for cash – had worked on the dossier with
Miller but was threatening to expose its lies for cash.”

One
thing is certain, if there is a connection between the dossier and
Skripal, which seems extremely likely, tying up a potential loose
end seems much more likely to be the reason for his poisoning than
the widely reported story that Russia tried to kill him. The fact
of the matter is that timing of the assassination attempt, being
one week before the Russian presidential election and prior to the
World Cup, seems to ring of a western intelligence operation meant
to tie up a loose end and ratchet up the ongoing
information/propaganda war against Russia.

Russia
had Skripal imprisoned for 4 years and he lived in the UK for 8
years. This would seem to have allowed for much more studious
timing if the Russians had wanted him dead. Are we to believe that
the Russians would pick the worst possible time—or is there a more
logical explanation?

The
reality is that the Trump administration’s investigation into the
use of the unverified dossier as a tool to weaponize the U.S.
intelligence apparatus for political purposes—as parts were
clearly used to gain FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign—is
coming to the public forefront. As this information becomes more
readily available there will be a much more in-depth investigation
into the sources and methods used by Steele.

Make
no mistake that contrary to the statement from Orbis, there is a
great likelihood that Skripal was intimately involved as a source
in the creation of the Trump/Russia dossier. There are clearly too
many connections between Steele, Miller, and Skripal to simply be
ignored or passed off as mere coincidence of circumstance!