Extremely Dangerous Storm Slicing Towards Alaska

An extremely dangerous storm is slicing toward northwestern Alaska and is expected to bring blizzard conditions and hurricane-strength winds to the state’s west coast. The storm, which formed from a mix of air masses over an area of ocean prone to spinning up strong storms, could be bigger than anything ever seen in the 49th state, the National Weather Service warned.

…

The storm is the product of warm air in the Pacific Ocean tapping into the cold air off Siberia, picking up speed in a jet stream near there and then intensifying as it moved into the Bering Sea – “a place where storms typically intensify,” Brader told OurAmazingPlanet.

The weird storm has an unusually long fetch length, which is the length of the wind blowing in a single direction over water. In this case it’s maybe 1,000 miles (1,600 km), Brader said.

To envision what a long fetch length will do, think about blowing wind with your mouth over a bowl of water; the water piles up at the opposite end. The same thing happens over the ocean. The stronger and longer the fetch length, the bigger the waves it will create.

The winds from the current storm will push high waves ashore and create widespread coastal flooding and severe erosion of the coastline, the NWS warns. Sea levels could rise as much as 10 feet (3 meters) above normal in the Norton Sound and along the Bering Strait coast.

We all know that everything is attributable to global climate warming change disruption, so two points to the first commentor who can post a source attributing the storm or resulting flooding to our old friend…

Does this count:
From the original source ‘The storm could be similar to a 1974 Alaska storm, but sea ice is lower in today’s warmer world, providing no protection along the coast, according to the NWS’
Thought it worth a try :o)

Reply: While leading, that’s probably an accurate statement, i.e. it is probably warmer than it was in 1974 and sea ice extent and area is probably lower than 1974, though the lack of satellite records leaves that with a question mark. JTF

nice big scary story for almost the entire New Zealand population and its insurance industry!

9 Nov: Stuff New Zealand: Rising seas on the way
NIWA coasts and natural hazards principal scientist Rob Bell spoke about planning for rising sea levels during the New Zealand Coastal Society annual conference at the Tahuna Beach Holiday Park conference centre on Monday…
One of main impacts of rising sea levels for the region would be extreme weather events such as storm tides, especially on low-lying areas of the central business district and suburbs such as The Wood, he said.
If sea levels were to rise by 30 centimetres, then a one-in-200-year storm event would become about a one-in-three year event…
Dr Bell said rises of more than a metre could not be ruled out, and should at least be considered.
Natural variability from the seasons, weather patterns such as El Nino, and 20-to-30-year warming and cooling patterns meant it would not be until about 2030 that scientists would be able to tell clearly if the difference in sea levels between then and now were due to any accelerated sea level rise. Climate change also affected the frequency of storms, floods, levels of sediments, erosion of sand spits, higher tides and water volumes in estuaries…
Conservation Department resource management planner Stephen Wynne-Jones said when extreme events became more frequent, some people were “going to find they’re going to have troubles with the insurance companies”…
Areas at risk of rising sea levels
65 per cent of NZ’s communities and major infrastructure are within 5km of the sea.
Twelve of NZ’s 15 largest towns and cities are coastal, and are home to 64 per cent of the total NZ population…http://www.stuff.co.nz/nelson-mail/news/5934690/Rising-seas-on-the-way

Joni has a story to tell:

4 Nov: Newsweek The Daily Beast: Joni Seager: Eye of the Storm
Why women get walloped more than men by the globe’s ever-changing climate
The gap is easiest to see in the most acute disasters. In the 2004 Southeast Asia tsunami, death rates for women across the region averaged three to four times that of men. That’s in part because girls and women, per tradition, were less likely to have been taught how to swim. Also, many lacked the upper body strength necessary to climb to safety or cling to a tree; and, most tragically, in a fast-moving storm surge, mothers who stopped to find and gather up children or other dependents lost valuable time, which in some cases meant the difference between life and death…
(Joni Seager is an activist and scholar in feminist geography, international women’s studies, and global environmental policy. She is the author of more than a dozen books, including the Atlas of Women in the World. She is Chair of Global Studies at Bentley University in Waltham, MA, and a consultant with the international NGO, AIDS-Free World.)http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/11/04/climate-change-and-natural-disasters-why-women-get-hit-hardest.html

Here is a link to the latest UW MM5-NAM 36km Domain, 72 hr forecast loop showing projected weather conditions in the North Pacific up to the southern half of Alaska. I believe this link is being updated twice a day. During the update process, loops may be incomplete as it usually takes several minutes to generate each new frame hot off the computer.

Excerpts follow. Bold added, which only emphasizes how this “article” is so ridiculous/pathetic as to be self-parodying.

Global warming intensified the destructive power of Hurricane Katrina along the Gulf Coast six years ago. Now Alaska is facing its own climate-change-linked superstorm. (…)
…
“The current lack of sea ice in the Bering Sea will allow this storm to maximize its impact,” the Weather Channel’s Tim Ballisty writes. That sea ice has been reduced to thin floes because of global warming pollution. (…)
…
In 2008, Kivalina sued Exxon Mobil and other top carbon polluters because climate change is destroying the village. In 2009, a judge dismissed the case, saying the damages are a “political question.” The case is now on appeal.

Open question: Why doesn’t Joe Romm (of the former stand-alone Climate Progress blog) have the byline? Were the claims that were to be included too preposterous for even him to stomach?

If there was sea ice, then ten foot storm tides would lift it, and hurricane force winds would grind it ashore. It would in no way “protect” the shore. In fact, when storms produce on-shore winds and the Great Lakes are frozen, the ice on occasion can snip shore-side trees like scissors cutting hair.

There is a video of ice grinding ashore on the North-slope coast of Alaska, somewhere. As I recall, human structures of metal don’t stand up to the ice all that well.

They are probably lucky there is little ice. Ten foot tides are bad enough. Any WUWT people up there? There’s nothing better than having a reporter on the scene. It sure beats having “Weather Channel’s Tim Ballisty” dream up scenarios from a warm office several thousand miles away.

I ever-so-vaguely recall watching a video many years ago (pre internet) about a storm that caused waves to hit mountainsides 1/2 a mile high somewhere around… hm, either Valdez or Seward, I don’t remember now. I believe the storm was supposed to have happened before any settling of Alaska, it was all based on damage to the side of the mountain, trees, rocks, etc.

Meh I just don’t remember the details. Pretty sure it was a storm though and not an earthquake, such an event from an earthquake isn’t nearly as remarkable.

As I recall Bearing storms are pretty common and can be pretty brutal. Don’t there people watch that Dangerous Catch show? :) Anyway, people living in that part of Alaska are pretty tough hombres, I’m sure they’ll make it through. Not to mention there are probably about 1/1000th of the # of people that were impacted by Katrina.

Spinifers: that was a 1958 earthquake that caused millions of tons of rock to sheer off and fall in a small bay. The 1720 ft wall of water removed soil down to the bedrock (6 ft diameter trees were removed 1720 ft above the bay.)

My prediction: A storm this powerful usually leaves behind a path of water that is 2-3C cooler than it was before the storm. This area will freeze up earlier than usual and probably with a larger coverage area.

I wonder if people making sea ice coverage predictions will take this into account.

I will state the obvious. There is no anthropogenic mechanism that explains this storm. The warm water colliding with cold air is the direct result of left over El Nino warm water that has migrated North, as it always does. The cold Arctic air is a duh statement. El Nino’s, arctic air temps and arctic pressure systems have not been mechanistically connected to anthropogenic causes. And neither have extreme weather events. Period. No researched and peer reviewed article has been published proposing a plausible anthropogenic mechanism. Not one. Any media article that appears to state such nonsense competes with snake oil sales pitches of the past.

This has gotten to the point that I am beginning to believe this current high degree of global warming religiosity competes quite well with that of the dark ages. Let us work, hope, and pray that we escape its grip on the more feeble and gullible minded folk.

1) AGW has warmed the oceans, therefore providing higher levels of evaporation, leading to more water vapour in the air.
2) AGW has also caused more warming in the tropics than the the poles. This leads to a higher temperature differential between the tropics and the poles, and therefore much stronger storms are generated.
3)These stronger storms (from the stronger temerature delta) combined with more water vapour in the air results in mega storms like these.
4) What makes this worse, is that the AGW warming of the oceans has caused a slight expansion of the oceas. This thermal expansion of the oceans makes the tidal surge much bigger and more devostating.
5) To make things even worse, carbon aerosols (soot) from China have masked these effects and caused a temporary slow down in warming over the past few years. But capitalism, corporate greed, Halliburton and Oil cartels (and George Bush of course) created the GFC which has caused a global financial downturn which has lead to much lower industrial activity in China over the past few years. This industrial downturn has greatly reduced soot/aerosol emissions in China, resulting in the reduction of the “soot” cooling, and a resumption of the warmening.

Only our faith and devotion to the enlightened ones (Gore, Obama, Hansen) can save us….

Mark Serreze says:
“The Bering Sea has and always will have these strong storms. What is different now is their potential destructiveness as you lose the sea ice cover,” he added.
Notice the “as you lose” part, meaning the ice loss is ongoing and implying that it will of course continue. Notice also, the choice of “what is different now”. Different from when? I suppose he means from 40 years ago, but he seems to be implying that sea ice cover has never been this low before.
Warmenistas know that by their choice of words, the Believers will get their message.

Has “slicing” got a special meaning with view to how a storm is approaching, e.g. angle/speed, or is this just another way to say “it’s coming”?

You have to use the correct media phraseology. When the storm reaches the shore line it will slam the coast and be packing hundred mile an hour winds. Perhaps Anthony can recall when this set of phrases became de-rigeur.

The problem with your explanation 2) is that the postulated tropical temperature increase has not materialised. The tropics are not warmer than they were before, say 50 years ago. Places like Darwin are cooler, in fact. The warming (guessed by GISS to be in the Arctic) decreases the very effect you claim has been increasing. Points 3, 4 and 5? Fail. The Chinese aerosol idea is total bunk. Don’t repeat it. It is a desperate diversionary ploy by warmists to explain the inexplicable: global cooling in the presence of more and more magic gas.

@Gary Mount
“Even if sea ice was at normal levels, there wouldn’t be much sea ice in that area this time of year anyway.”

Agreed. It does not seem to have occurred to the ‘ice protection theory’ people that a) ice floats providing no meaningful protection at all and b) having your house hit by a 5 ft thick ice floe is not better than having it hit by a tsunami.

Your post, ggm, would be even better if you include mechanisms. How’s this one?

Re: warmed oceans. A molecule has been discovered in the soup of ocean salt water that absorbs LW infrared quickly and makes it heavier, thus sinking below the thermocline rapidly. These molecules sink to the bottom of the ocean, loaded with heat (which is what makes them heavier). The warmed molecules eventually find their way back to the ocean top layers (via the overturning circulation) and add heat to El Nino’s, resulting in hotter ones.

RE: ggm
**2) AGW has also caused more warming in the tropics than the the poles. This leads to a higher temperature differential between the tropics and the poles, and therefore much stronger storms are generated.**
You forgot the *sarc*.
But the above statement seems to be a reverse as may AGW proponents have stated that the poles are warming faster.

Paul says:
November 9, 2011 at 5:29 am
Spinifers: that was a 1958 earthquake that caused millions of tons of rock to sheer off and fall in a small bay. The 1720 ft wall of water removed soil down to the bedrock (6 ft diameter trees were removed 1720 ft above the bay.)

Also: anything over 100 ft isn’t a wave, it’s a slap.

One of the science channels had a program on mega tsunamis and included this. They interviewed the guy who happen to be in the bay at anchor to get away from a storm and spend the night. He said he and his son rode out the wave at times to levels of 450 ft. He made this calucation based on the amount of anchor chain he had that played out.

I have discussed this at length with James Hansen, Michael Mann and the UEA. They have suggested that if you could delay giving me the points for a couple of months they would then be worth 24.7 points.

Reply: We can make this accommodation, but we will need a coal train, hockey stick and unsecured server in return… JTF

Officials in the Northwest Alaska community of Kivalina, trying to dispel fears among villagers as a massive storm bears down on the region, said the city is preparing the school for use as a long-term shelter.
(…)
The world knows the Inupiat community, clinging to an 8-mile barrier island northwest of Kotzebue, as a poster town for global warming. Fall storms in recent years have swiped away swaths of shoreline that in colder times would have been armored with wave-dampening sea ice.
(…)
The community received special mention in warnings from the National Weather Service that called the tempest life-threatening and compared it to a blast in November 1974 that hammered the coast. It will have a “severe impact” on Kivalina, the weather service warned.

Then, however, the village had its sea-ice protection. Not so today, a reality that’s heightened tensions in town.

But Mitchell said the city expects to be safe. The storm is projected to boost seas as much as 8-feet higher than normal. But a coastline rock-revetment constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers rises 13-feet above sea level and protects essential infrastructure, such as the tank farm, power plant and village school.
(…)

So this “poster town for global warming” is on a silty small barrier island, barely above the current sea level, which on geological timescales come and go in the blink of an eye, but the recent juxtaposition of low sea ice with fall storms has increased the human-noticeable rate of erosion… Which lead to them concluding it must be the fault of anthropogenic global warming of which the natural recourse is suing “Exxon Mobil and other top carbon polluters” for causing the ongoing destruction of their island.

If there’s one thing I’ve learned from the (C)AGW debate, it’s that anything climate-related can be made to sound plausible when there’s enough money to be gained by convincingly claiming it. I wonder how much the lawyers are charging to pursue the case. Heck, I’m wondering who is paying the lawyers, as it’s highly doubtful those villagers could afford suing “Big Oil” by themselves.

A very strong storm (then estimated as a “200-yr” storm) hit the region in the fall of 1963 doing a lot of damage to the U.S. research camp located in Barrow and prompted some interesting studies and recommendations in the literature about how local development should proceed in the face of a warming climate.

I know this isn’t close to the first but thought I’d pass it along because it is available.
Dr. Master’s is indirectly attributing this to Al Gore’s Warming by identifying the climate has changed the amount of sea ice available to slow down the waves.http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/article.html

As for the Katrina stuff, a geo-spatial analysis of those that died in New Orleans showed they were the old and sick and lived close to a failed levee and died of drowning or complications from loss of essential services.

Just curious, does Alaskan sea ice behave differently than Great Lakes ice or Chesapeake Bay ice when driven by wind and tide? I know on Lake Superior and in the Chesapeake the combination of high wind and above normal water level (water is piled up by the wind and/or tide) causes the ice to start moving. And believe me, what a sheet of ice miles wide and several inches or more deep does when it piles up on the shoreline is impressive! Ice mounds 10 to 30 feet high where we would drag our aluminum canoes to the top and sled down into the water (or onto the ice if any remained). When the ice finally disappeared, the shoreline would be altered. Bottom line, in my limited experience, shore ice does not protect anything when driven by wind and water. So when I read about ice protecting the shore when a storm like this hits, especially when high water accompanies the high winds, I am skeptical about the knowlege and experience level of the writer.

Looks more like the start of an Ice Age. Warm water. Cold air. Heaps of snow
And snow fall on mountain tops that does not melt over the summer, with winter snow storms that begin earlier, as in October……

This kind of thing will reverse the shrinking glaciers perhaps. BTW, I haven’t heard a word about shrinking glaciers for about 2 years, or palm trees marching up Kilimanjaro, or Lake Chad shrinking to a kiddie pool, or the drying up of the Amazon basin…. I think its time for someone like Willis to take on this update.

“”This is the strongest storm in that Alaskan area since November, 1974.

The US outbreak this year of F3-F5 tornadoes was the worst since 1974.

The flooding in eastern Australia this year was the worst since 1974.

The common thread is a strong La Nina in both years.””

1974 is one of my analog years for 2011 in my forecast method, on the 13th of November, 2011 the lunar declinational position is at maximum North extent, which IMHO is driving the crest of the storm as the result of production of the lunar tidal bulge in the atmosphere.

I have data tabled for the Alaska forecast but development of the mapping process is still not finished to add Alaska to my forecast coverage area.(The developer is wondering why I am getting frustrated!)

I was in Alaska in the 1960’s. I was very interested in the fact that ships with cargo for Nome would anchor 10 to 15 miles off the coast and transfer the cargo to low draft barges to be brought to land. There was a very shallow shelf which extended offshore. The celestial tide was only about two feet peak to peak, but ships which could have reach wharves at normal conditions did not try since it took only a mild offshore breeze to cause a wind tide of several feet. I was told that wind tides of +- five feet were very common.
I did not spend much time in Nome, but in Teller (about 70 miles up the coast from Nome), I saw a drop of over three feet in a few hours in what I thought was a moderate wind. I suspect that a prediction of a ten foot change from a major storm may be very conservative.

Sorry if someone has already covered this, but could this Alaksan super storm have any connection with the recent “tilt” and rift in the IMF (not the International Monetary Fund) from a couple of days ago? The one that allowed all that solar wind in that created a lot of auroas?

What is particularly funny – at least in my opinion – is that the arguments he lists are pretty much those given by all of the people who say we are going to see more severe weather events. That is about the extent of their science.

I had seen in the Weather.com’s article yesterday about the “superstorm” a reference that went much like this. “Sea ice levels are much less than they were in the last major storm in 1974… so that [adds to the danger] here.” It’s not a direct quote, but I caught on right away and commented : (you may have to hunt for it and try to backtrack to the article)

Violent weather is attributed to a cooling planet. Cold fronts are more violent in their passage than warm fronts, at least so far as I have seen. But this storm is a big, very powerful storm.

As to the “lowered ice levels”- I don’t recall that sea ice forms as far south as Nome by November… I think it is usually way to north, north of the Bering Strait. Nome faces the northern Pacific well to the south of the Bering Strait. Anyone have the ability to check on this?

If I am right, it looks like global warming bias, that pseudo-religion of this day and age – carries the hysteria factor on this report instead of addressing the REAL problem – that a lot of people are in danger from a severe storm, and would probably need to evacuate before it arrives.

I’ll bet I am right on this and that this story was badly researched.”

———
Funny thing is I cannot find the claim to AGW / Sea ice levels in subsuquent articles today on TWC… I wonder if my little comment made a difference…

Spinifers says:
November 9, 2011 at 5:03 am
I ever-so-vaguely recall watching a video many years ago (pre internet) about a storm that caused waves to hit mountainsides 1/2 a mile high somewhere around… hm, either Valdez or Seward, I don’t remember now. I believe the storm was supposed to have happened before any settling of Alaska, it was all based on damage to the side of the mountain, trees, rocks, etc.

Meh I just don’t remember the details. Pretty sure it was a storm though and not an earthquake, such an event from an earthquake isn’t nearly as remarkable.

_____

No storm surges are ever that high, however, there are several other possibilities for the event you are referring to. One of those would be a tsunami, the largest ever recorded was in Alaska:

Blaming this storm on ongoing global warming assumes the presence of ongoing global warming. RSS monthly anomaly data updated through October was posted today atftp://ftp.ssmi.com/msu/monthly_time_series/rss_monthly_msu_amsu_channel_tlt_anomalies_land_and_ocean_v03_3.txt The October anomaly was +0.089. I’ve listed the 12 values for 1995, and the 10 values so far for 2011. If the next 2 months (Nov+Dec) average lower than +0.139, then RSS for 2011 will be cooler than RSS for 1995. Similarly, if Hadley Oct+Nov+Dec anomalies average lower than +0.335, then Hadley 2011 will be cooler than Hadley 1997. We’re talking the other side of 1998 in both cases, which might wake some people up.

“As most Alaskans know, most of the gold taken from Nome was found on the beach. Curiously, thousands of stampeders walked over it on their way to the creeks before they knew it was there.”
=========
Time to do some beachcombing in Alaska ?
The snow may prove to be a hindrance :)

The ice protects the coast in much the same way as a bulldozer protests a building it travels through.

Those of us in south central Alaska do watch these storms for a couple reasons. First is because they tend to dump some snow – of course most of it falls sideways due to the wind. Second is that in late December and January, they will occasionally bring rain statewide, trashing the snow while turning the entire place into a skating rink until the next couple of snow storms. This one is a bit early for that and varying amounts of snow are predicted. Cheers –

The approaching storm in the Bering Sea indeed may exceed the 100-year “design storm” intensity, to which standard many coastal structures on the west coast of Alaka have been built.

The “mega tsunami” that sheared off mature trees at elevations up to 1700 ft in Lituya Bay on July 9, 1958, however, was caused by a massive landslide at the head of an elongate bay. It had nothing to do with storm surge. By the time the wall hit open water, it was reduced by orders of magnitude. Because of rapid dispersion, it never registered on tide gauges around the Pacific Ocean, as would a true tsunami raised by the spatially more extensive displacement of a submarine earthquake.

The CAGWarmists who patrol Wikipedia in order to remove any entries that contradict their points of view do not always eliminate the research findings that conflict them. For example, the Niigata Prefectural Museum of History reported that Early Jomon sub-period period (Early Jomon (ca 4800-3000 BC) (Hamanasuno, Tochibara Rockshelter, Sannai Maruyama) coincided with an increase in world-wide sea levels and warmer mean temperatures than today. Core samples indicate the sea level was 2-3 metres higher than today; pushing the coastline well inland for the Kanto plain.

Mark Serreze would seem to be the first person to blame the coming storm damage on global warming:

Powerful storms of this magnitude are common at this time of year in the Bering Sea and North Pacific, but this storm is unusual because of its northward trajectory and the lack of sea ice in near-shore areas like Norton Sound off Nome, National Weather Service and other agency officials said.

“Forty years ago, a big storm like this would come through and the sea ice would act as sort of a buffer,” said Mark Serreze, director of the Snow and Ice Data Center.

“The Bering Sea has and always will have these strong storms. What is different now is their potential destructiveness as you lose the sea ice cover,” he added.

I first saw this comment by Serreze Tuesday evening.

Of course at this time of year sea ice is rapidly forming, making the difference year to year in when a certain level of sea ice coverage is reached a matter of a couple of weeks, so if “the Bering Sea will always have these strong storms,” it can certainly have them two weeks earlier, when “normal” ice coverage would be the same as today, meaning that we could just as well have the present combination of storm and ice conditions without the small amount of late 20th century global warming (which in any case is not significantly attributable to human activity).

“Major damage had been forecast for Nome and for Kivalina, a village that has suffered severe erosion for years because declining sea ice has made it more vulnerable to storms — conditions scientists attribute to climate change.”

@Dave Springer
WUWT extends the climate news by providing a place where people from all over the world can comment, and also not be censored. It also provides a one stop shop for historical reference. I enjoy participating in discussions or just reading comments from others.

===================================================================
Yes, it was. Also boring as hell most of the time. Navy base & radar, etc. . There were about 1/2 dozen deaths due to weather while I was there. Blizzard/whiteout could come up very suddenly. However, the salmon fishing & crabbing were outstanding. :)

Just saw an ABC (US) World News piece, banging the global warming drum again. Apparently “once in a lifetime” weather events are happening every month, etc. (BTW, 2011 had the 2nd hottest summer on record, and I don’t recall being sent the memo about that.)

They featured Bill Patzert, a NASA climatoligist. In what sounded to me as a “creative” way to edit a damning sound bite, he said something like “Some scientists attribute this to global warming” and that’s where they cut it.

…”A teacher at the McQueen School in Kivalina, Emma Knowles, said about 150 people had slept at the school on Tuesday night but that so far power had largely stayed on in village houses. She said there did not appear to be obvious flooding, but that the storm was still going strong. The school was providing food to residents.

“We’re just kind of hunkered down and watching the wind,” Ms. Knowles said. “And the kids are going crazy.”
======
No worries, one thing I have learned in my life, is that when you are way out in the wilderness your best hope for survival is a strong woman.

While we don’t know to what extent global warming is the cause of this storm’s intensity, we do know that storms of this size and intensity do significantly cool the Earth’s climate by transferring ocean heat into the atmosphere and poleward. Then there is the increased albedo from snow as this storm tracks east over land.

Next month should see a significant drop in North Pacific SSTs, feeding through into the global number.

u.k.(us) says:
November 9, 2011 at 1:41 pm
““As most Alaskans know, most of the gold taken from Nome was found on the beach. Curiously, thousands of stampeders walked over it on their way to the creeks before they knew it was there.”
=========
Time to do some beachcombing in Alaska ?
The snow may prove to be a hindrance :)”

UK,
The gold found on the alaskan beaches was (and is) ‘flour gold’. This is gold dust milled so fine from the glacial river outwashes that is ‘flour fine’. It can be difficult to extract from the sands, but specialized techniques were eventually developed to extract useful amounts. Beach combing on the AK coasts is more likely to find remnant wreckage from the Japanese tsunami than any easily collected gold nuggets.

“A number of individuals still mine and prospect the Nome area. During the summertime, visitors work the famous Nome beach Sands and recover a few ounces of fine flake gold. The best beach sand has high concentrations of Garnet and iron minerals, but the Garnet gives it a distinct deep red color. These concentrated zones are easy to recognize. There are also commercial suction dredging operations that work the beach deposits that are located offshore. In addition, the GPAA organization has its Alaska facility not far from Nome.”
——
I was just thinking the storm might concentrate the gold with its wave action, sorry for the facetious
comment.

The latest UW MM5-NAM 36km Domain, 72 hr computer forecast loop seems to suggest the formation of an Eastern Pacific high-pressure area in position to sweep cold air down the West Coast early next week.