I may not know much about art…

…but I do know something about “religion”, and for some time, I have wondered about “The Blake Prize for Religious Art”. Now, at last, someone has dared to state the obvious: the Emperor has no clothes!, or, more to the point, “The Blake Prize” has no religion!

Rachel Kohn, ABC Radio’s The Spirit of Things has done a devastating expose of Australia’s most well known religious art exhibition/prize. She doesn’t set it up that way – oh no, she is far to clever for that. She has called this episode “Both Sides Now” – and indeed that is what she does: she allows “both sides” to have their say. How much more balanced can you get than that?

Well… The Rev. Dr Rob Patterson – described as “an artist, art historian, and educational facilitator” (and in his spare time a minister of the Uniting Church – a “trendy vicar” as McDonald calls him) is given what we would call “enough rope” to present the case “pro” The Blake, and then, after the rope has been tossed over a nearby tree-branch, John McDonald (art critic for the Sydney Morning Herald) is given the other end and a licence to pull with all his might.

The verdict? The bulk of the entries – and certainly the winners – in The Blake are either not “art” or, more devastatingly, do not contain any element that could authentically be described as “religious”. McDonald says that the judges would run a mile from anything that was truly “religious”, truly “devotional”, and prefer images of vague “spirituality” and avante garde iconoclasm. He wonders whether, in this secular day and age, it is even possible to have a truly “religious” art exhibition.

One interesting aspect McDonald and Kohn do pick up on is the fact that the winning piece is a video of a domestic sufi prayer ritual. Very reverent – “but not art” according to McDonald. Why such a reverent piece about Islam while only irreverent treatments of Christianity are allowed, ponders McDonald. Kohn puts this question to Patterson – who masterfully evades the question. (There is some evidence, I think, that Kohn actually interviewed McDonald first and then very cleverly worked McDonald’s critique into her questions to Patterson – although to give her credit, Kohn herself would have been very aware of the disparity between the way The Blake treats Islam and Christianity).

Originally, The Blake was designed to foster a truly Australian religious artistic expression and to produce works that could be placed within churches and synagogues and temples. No one in their right mind would include any of the entries in a true house of worship.

There isn’t a transcript for me to point you too, so you will just have to listen to it yourself to gain the full rhetorical impact of McDonald’s critique.

UPDATE: The transcript is now available at the link above. I will give just a few snippets:

Rachael Kohn: Is there something of a disconnect between the way the ironic and critical way in which Western traditions are represented and evaluated by comparison to the acceptance of this much more reverential expression of the Islamic faith?

Rod Pattenden: Certainly with the winning work you really are invited in to sit on the ground on a small Persian mat and to watch a three channel video of a Sufi ceremony. So it is very hospitable. …There are other works from a Western tradition that try to do the same thing. As a person who looks at a lot of art and looks at the way artists deal with religious subject matter, I realise for myself as a complex human being engaging between traditions, trying to put it all together, that I in fact do desperately need a sense of humour. I think irony is actually such a gift, it allows you to participate but also participate in a critical manner. I think if one is only pious you become very quickly like a fundamentalist, everything around you becomes just a sign of affirmation. I think to believe in this post-modern situation, in a complex world of competing demands, you really need a sense of humour. The only way to have sacred cows is to kick them.

And:

Rachael Kohn: Has the Blake Prize perhaps turned into its opposite? Is it actually fearful of explicitly devotional religious art?

John McDonald: I think the Blake Prize has an absolute, shall we say, unholy dread of devotional art. I think if somebody were to put in a series of works that were genuinely religious or genuinely seemed to profess some kind of religious faith that the judges each year would run a mile. I’d say just give the whole thing a revamp. It’s in a terrible double-bind, because in order to be a fashionable, of-the-moment, cutting-edge art prize, it has to more or less dispense with all of the things that it was originally intended to do, which is to look at the role of religion in life and to actually celebrate religion, to make people think seriously about religion by bringing it to an art exhibition.

About Schütz

I am Catholic, married to Cathy, father of Maddy & Mia. Since 2002, I have been the Executive Officer of the Ecumenical & Interfaith Commission of the Archdiocese of Melbourne. I was once a Lutheran pastor, but a "year of grace" and soul-searching led me into the Catholic Church. It was a bumpy ride, but with the support of my (still Lutheran) wife, I was finally confirmed on June 16, 2003.

5 Responses to I may not know much about art…

“Why such a reverent piece about Islam while only irreverent treatments of Christianity are allowed, ” Perhaps it is time that there be an alternative “Prize for Religious Art”. Could we call it the HOLMAN HUNT Prize for Religious Art or respect to our Jewish fellow citizens the Monrefiore prize for Religious Art?
And the pieces submitted could hang in churches ,cathedrals and synagogues.

That should be out of ” respect for our Jewish fellow citizens” (hi to the SSPX by the way !) and to quote Pope Benedicts letter to all Christians after his visit to Germany “painters dipped their brushes in that colored alphabet, which is the Bible”
A new generation of painters need to do that now .

go to the Glorificamus Society under the heading.
“Friday, 2 September 2011
Pope Benedict XVI: The Way of Beauty – Via Pulchritudinis – “Sacred music that makes the chords of our heart resound”
You may have already seen it Schutz elsewhere

Disclaimer

All opinions on this page expressed by the blog owner are those of the blog owner alone, and are in no way to be taken as the opinions of the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne or its agencies.

Any opinion on this page expressed by a visiting commentator is the opinion of that commentator alone and is in no way to be taken as the opinion of the blog owner.

I hope that is clear enough for everyone?

About This Blog

SCE is a blog in "the Spirit of Benny 16". It is a place to discuss Catholic Theology, Ecumenism, Interfaith relations, History, Liturgy, Philosophy and whatever topics are hot in the ecclesiastical world!

I view the combox as the most important feature of this site, and I imagine our commentators sharing a glass of after dinner port as we discuss in a gentlemanly/ladylike manner the issues most dear to us.

Archives

Anima Education

The Schütz Model for a Elective Australian Constitutional Monarchy

I propose that
1) We replace the absentee monarch of Australia (who is also the Monarch of Great Britain) with an elected Australian monarchy.
2) The elected monarch exactly replaces the current monarch in the current constition.
3) The elected monarch has exactly the same powers, duties and responsibilities as those of the current absentee monarch. All the monarch's functions are carried out by his/her personal representatives (as is currently the case): federally by the Governor General, and in the states by the State Governors.
4) The Governor General and the Governors continue to be selected and appointed as they currently are, that is, by the premier with the approval of the monarch.
5) The monarch is elected to sovereignty over Australia for life, but his/her sovereignty is strictly non-hereditary.
6) The elective body is the "college of electors" comprised of the state governors and federal governor general.
7) The election of the monarch must be a unanimous decision on the part of the college of electors.

"The fervant Romanists have always this point in their favour: that they are ready to believe. And they have a desire for the conversion of men which is honest in exactly inverse ration to the dishonesty of the means which they employ to produce it."-- Anthony Trollope, "The Way We Live Now"

J.G. Schütz Family Arms

"The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head."-- Terry Pratchet, Hogfather, page 242

"I really don't think I'm arrogant, but I do get impatient with people who don't share with me the same humility in front of the facts."--Richard Dawkins