Despite emotional protests and fierce lobbying from gay rights groups, United Methodists voted on Thursday (May 2) to maintain their … Continued

by Daniel Burke| Religion News Service

Despite emotional protests and fierce lobbying from gay rights groups, United Methodists voted on Thursday (May 2) to maintain their denomination’s stance that homosexuals acts are “incompatible with Christian teaching.”

Two “agree to disagree” proposals were soundly defeated during separate votes by the nearly 1,000 delegates gathered for the United Methodist Church’s General Conference in Tampa, Fla.

One proposal would have replaced the “incompatible” phrase in the Book of Discipline, which contains the denomination’s laws and doctrines. Both proposals sought to soften the disputed doctrine by adding more ambiguous statements about homosexuality.

Gay rights advocates in the UMC viewed the compromise proposals as the best chance to advance their cause at this year’s General Conference, which convenes every four years. On Friday, delegates are expected to debate the church’s bans on noncelibate gay clergy and same-sex marriage.

With nearly 8 million members in the U.S., the UMC remains the country’s largest mainline Protestant denomination. But United Methodism is shrinking in the U.S. and growing in Africa and Asia, shifting the balance of power to overseas conservatives. Nearly 40 percent of the delegates gathered in Tampa live outside the U.S.

Thursday’s debate put the denomination’s wide diversity on display — as gays and lesbians pleaded for recognition of their “sacred worth” and an African delegate, speaking through an interpreter, compared homosexuality to bestiality.

The proposals defeated on Thursday would have acknowledged that diversity, but, some conservatives argued, at the cost of muddying traditional doctrines.

One proposal would have changed the Book of Discipline to say that gays and lesbians are “people of sacred worth” and that church members differ about “whether homosexual practices (are) contrary to the will of God.”

The Rev. Adam Hamilton, a pastor in Leawood, Kansas, argued the proposal would “acknowledge our disagreement on a huge issue that is separating churches in North America today.”

That proposal was defeated by a tally of 54 — 46 percent.

“I see no reason why we should state (in the Book of Discipline) that we disagree,” said the Rev. Maxie Dunnam, former president of Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Ky. “We disagree on almost every issue we consider.”

The delegates defeated another compromise proposal by an even wider margin: 61 to 39 percent. The resolution would have acknowledged a “limited understanding” of human sexuality and called on the church to “refrain from judgment regarding homosexual persons and practices until the Spirit leads us to new insight.”

The Rev. Steve Wendy of Texas argued that the compromise would cause confusion and lead the church to “stumble in our witness.”

“If you look at our largest congregations, and crunch the numbers, they are all reaching young adults successfully,” Wendy said. “And, overwhelmingly, they teach and proclaim God’s truth without compromise.”

But Jennifer Ihlo, a lay delegate from the Baltimore/Washington Conference, argued in favor of the compromise. “I want to be clear that this is not an abstract issue. This is about people who are being harmed by the church and by the use of the ‘incompatibility’ language,” Ihlo said.

“I am a lesbian and a child of God and I strongly urge the body to support this compromise language so that gay youth … will recognize that the church loves them and God loves them and the violence and pain and suicide will stop.”

After the proposals were defeated on Thursday, gay rights activists flooded the assembly floor and disrupted the session by singing the hymn “What Does the Lord Require of You?”

Indiana Bishop Michael Coyner, chair of the morning session, told the protesters, “I think you’re actually hurting your point.” When the protesters refused to stop singing, Coyner closed the session, sent the delegates to an early lunch and threatened to bar protesters from the convention hall in the afternoon.

Church leaders and the protesters later worked out a compromise, according to United Methodist News Service. On Thursday afternoon, the delegates shifted their attention to clergy pension plans, leaving key votes on gay clergy and same-sex marriage to Friday, the last day of General Conference.

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Universal Uclick.

It’s a well-known fact that you have to change your life style to fit Gods word not the other way around. And thank God for the African delegation and the good news is it will be twice as strong in 4 years.I am so very very happy with the United Methodist Church and even those who were in disagreement well someday come to know that they were wrong and remember you’re very welcome in the pews just not in the pulpit. God loves you and so do I even though you’ve gone astray when you change your lifestyle to fit God’s word you will be welcome back into the fold praise the Lord .Aman!

plattitudes

Good for the Methodist faith to stand up for what they believe in, especially when faced by so much antagonism. Reminds me of the couplet we learned in grade school–“what is popular is not always right, what is right is not always popular.” I’m glad to see so many churches who can welcome all of God’s children while still staying true to God’s doctrine. We all have sins and behaviors we need to change, and the Church is a place to help each other do that; who are we to judge someone who sins differently than us? As long as we are trying to change ourselves to meet with God’s law, and not the other way around, we’ll be welcome at Church.

feetxxxl1

its interesting that you bring up god’s law, which god are you referring to? the triune god? under the triunes god’s new covenant we died to the law………….in christ(god) , be ressurrected in christ(god) to be under his grace(love)……..spirit, because spirit gives life and the law gives no life. if you have a case about homosexuality it would be that it comes against what we are under. it doesnt. no issue more clearly defines the differences between the old and new covenant than the issue of homosexuality.