The thing I don't understand is, why do all her supporters tell US that WE are stupid and making up conspiracy theories after she deleted THIRTY THOUSAND enails from a PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER that she had a PRIVATE CONTRACTOR set up for her in HER BARN. And they think that just because she's CURRENTLY under INVESTIGATION by THE FBI and the DOJ of the ADMINISTRATION OF THE MAN WHO JUST ENDORSED HER that it's the CONSERVATIVES making stuff up.

Yeah, okay. Would you like a double shot of kool-aid with your stupidity, leftists?

And you imagine that they performed some conspiracy where they colluded to hide emails instead of turning them over, lol, suuuure they did. Hint-- there were 60,000 emails to sort-- did they all stand there and so "this one yes, that one no?"

Keep doubling down on the conspiracy, but (another hint if you think it through)-- Clinton did not sort the emails. Her aides and attorneys did, and the radical rights propaganda shows why very wisely did that. But sure, all the aides and attorneys got together and said conspired to hide some nefarious emails to protect her, committing a felony for her, lol. Suuuuuure they did. And they all have kept it secret for over two years, not one of them admitting it under all this endless GOP fishing trip pressure and propaganda. Suuuure, lol.

Hopefully you can realize that is pretty much textbook conspiracy theory nonsense.

Try and let it sink in--
--none were classified
--a group of people handled the sorting of business v. personal
--they were turned in in 2014

Stop lapping up the GOP propaganda and think about the facts. If you can't, here's a challenge-- tell us what law the facts show was broken...

The classified is bad enough, but the ones dealing with the "foundation" are probably more indictable but will never come to light. She is the most dangerous type, one of those who believes so much in herself that any manner of dishonesty is okay because after all only she can save the world.

Yeah well it's my suspicion that the FBI is taking a ling time with this because they probably have access to stuff that normally they would never be able to touch- Such as the "Clinton Foundation of Money Laundering"

Actually that's why I made this meme; Some user on this site thinks I'm just a sexist right-wing conspiracy theorist because I suggested that her top aides and attorneys were probably not very honest about what they turned over to the FBI. Unbelievable.

Just a question. Wouldn't be illegal not to mention unethical for HER attorneys to turn over incriminating evidence against her? And since when is it impossible to believe an side would not cover up for an employer. Remember Rose Mary Woods? Her "accidental" erasing of a tape helped bring down a sitting president. Sometimes a conspiracy is a conspiracy.

Nothing in what you write was against the law. Hillary is NOT the target of the investigation-- hint: she did not do the technical work of setting up the server, nor did she decide which emails to delete (which were personal emails, so not under jurisdiciton of State Department), and none of them were classified at the time.

In order to continue your propaganda and biased view, you just ignore the facts, which are, again (let this sink in if your bias will allow it):

1) None of the emails were marked classified at the time. Not one. Zero.
2) Her aides and attorneys turned over for recordkeeping what they thought were all the State Department related emails in 2014...there were a handful inadvertantly left out (because they were in email chains from BEFORE she was Secretary of State) which amounted to nothing, also not classified.
3)The tech got immunity so that they could not catch him on some technical minor nitpicking rule.

To reiterate:
-- investigation is of the server and it's maintenance and security(we've known this for over 8 months), the FBI is mainly looking for flaws in server security and whether it was breached, thus the tech requested and got immunity so as not to be snared by some unknown technical law
-- no emails were marked classified (we've known this for over 6 months), and all but a handful (which were innocuous and in an email chain from before she was Secretary of State) were turned in for recordkeeping (we've known this since 2014)

... which states very clearly (and in Febrruary) :"there is no indication they were marked as such at the time"-- correct, they were not. That should make it clear to people who still think this is about Hillary's emails that it is not, it is about the server and it's security-- technical stuff. Thus the tech, Bryan Pagliano, and his attorneys know it is about trying to snare him, thus he is not going to talk to them until given full immunity.

""“The mere fact that the government was willing to offer Pagliano ‘use’ immunity here in exchange for his testimony indicates that his fear of prosecution is more than fanciful or speculative.” (Pagliano's attorneys)
http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/07/bryan-paglianos-lawyers-provide-new-details-about-immunity-agreement-with-justice-department/

That's true! But they might screw themselves over too. Tbh her supporters wouldn't care. If they can ignore all this, there is nothing she could do to lose her base besides possibly physically ripping out their heart or something

I read (the source was a comment on Facebook, and I can't find it because it was deleted or removed) that since as early as 1990, the certain people working for the Clintons that found something out and were key witnesses apparently have died throughout the years... careful buddy, you look into her life, you might be killed.