These are some of the reasons why we are vegans

"What they’re essentially doing here is replacing inspection with chemical
treatments that they think are going to deal with contamination, with E.
coli or salmonella. So the companies are going to be using more chemicals to
try to sanitize the meat that we eat instead of having real inspection."

Half of the USDA inspectors in industrial meat plants will be replaced
with inspectors employed by the very same companies whose meats they are
inspecting if plans by the US Department of Agriculture are allowed to go
forward.

Is there poop in your pork and poultry? It’s a serious question.

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has plans to expand a privatized
meat inspection model that has been in place for 14 years at five hog plants
in the United States and which has been found to fail time and time again at
preventing contamination of meat - with fecal matter.

The program, known as the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point-Based
Inspection Models Project - or HIMP - has been in place since the late 1990s
and its expansion would replace almost half the USDA Food Safety Service
inspectors in industrial meat plants with inspectors employed by those very
same companies. It would reportedly speed up production lines by as much as
20 percent.

But a recent article in The Washington Post, reports that three out of the
five pilot HIMP plants were among the 10 worst health and safety violators
in the country, according to a spring report by the USDA inspector general.

"The USDA all along has been saying that these pilots will prove that
removing government inspectors and turning over [their] the responsibilities
to the company employees will enhance food safety when, in essence, the
exact opposite has occurred," said Tony Corbo, who directs the food program
at nonprofit Food & Water Watch.

Although the HIMP pilot program is still in a preliminary stage, the
Agriculture Department has given a green light to Australia, Canada and New
Zealand to use this experimental, privatized model of food inspection in
meat plants whose products are for export to the United States, even though
the foreign plants operating under processes considered equivalent to the
HIMP program have experienced an epidemic of contamination-related problems
within the past two years, including a Canadian plant which had to recall
more than 8.8 million pounds of beef product fouled with E. coli.

Corbo told Truthout that, in a letter to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack,
a coalition of consumer groups are formally requesting the USDA halt the
HIMP pilot projects and revoke the determination the department has made
with foreign countries, which allows them to use similar meat inspection
processes.

"In the other countries, it’s going to be a little more complicated [to stop
the pilot programs] because the USDA has already given their blessing,
unless they re-evaluate the equivalency," he said.

According to Corbo, poultry companies like Tyson Foods began pushing for the
privatized model in the 1990s, under the Clinton administration, and
self-selected their company plants for these privatized pilot programs.
Currently, 20 poultry plants in the United States are using a similar pilot
program to HIMP, and the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS)
announced in January of 2012 that it would expand the program across all
poultry plants in the country.

The meat industry continues to support the HIMP program, as well as similar
privatized pilot programs operating within pork and poultry plants around
the country despite the many problems plaguing these pilot plants. Tom
Super, vice president of communications with the National Chicken Council
said the HIMP program doesn’t fail to prevent contamination because the
cases of contaminated meat found by the inspector general at the HIMP pork
plants did not actually leave the plant. The meat found to be contaminated
with fecal matter was still caught by health inspectors at the end of the
processing line, but federal officials told The Washington Post that the
contamination was found much too late in the inspection process.

"In essence, the inspectors did their jobs, the public was protected and no
recalls or foodborne illness outbreaks were linked to any of these plants,"
Super told Truthout in an email.

He also asserted that the average positive rate for salmonella contamination
in HIMP pilot plants is 20 percent lower than the average positive rate of
contamination in nonpilot plants. His data is drawn from a 2011 FSIS
evaluation of chicken slaughter establishments participating in the HIMP
program.

But according to reports from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and
the inspector general, there just isn’t enough data to support whether or
not HIMP improves food safety.

In fact, the GAO report found that the "FSIS’ conclusion about the pilot
project was based, in part, on comparisons of data that were not designed to
be comparable." Additionally, the data FSIS and Super cite is outdated,
according to the GAO assessment:

Moreover, data from the last 2 years analyzed did not show a significantly
lower prevalence of salmonella for plants participating in the pilot
project. According to FSIS officials, FSIS did not collect data to
demonstrate the relative effectiveness of plants participating and not
participating in any of the pilot projects. Instead, the agency analyzed
data for a variety of inspection activities performed in all plants
(regardless of a plant’s inspection system) to ensure their compliance with
regulatory requirements.

Super also cited data from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics showing the
poultry industry has had a 74 percent decrease in its worker injury and
illness rates since 1994. But again, there just may not be enough data to
fully back up the industry’s claims.

Food & Water Watch has teamed up with other consumer advocate groups to
pressure USDA to examine the worker safety aspect of increased line speeds
at pilot plants, but Corbo says the USDA has thus far been resistant to look
at the rates of carpal tunnel syndrome among employees at HIMP plants.

The FSIS did not respond to Truthout’s request for comment.

"They’re going to increase the line speed, in those plants, to 175
birds-a-minute for chicken plants. There’s only going to be one USDA
inspector left on that line, so you tell me how a USDA inspector is supposed
to look at three birds every second to determine whether there’s visible
fecal contamination on that bird," Corbo said.

"What they’re essentially doing here is replacing inspection with chemical
treatments that they think are going to deal with contamination, with E.
coli or salmonella. So the companies are going to be using more chemicals to
try to sanitize the meat that we eat instead of having real inspection."

All-Creatures.org Health Position and Disclaimer

We began this archive as a means of assisting our
visitors in answering many of their health and diet questions, and in
encouraging them to take a pro-active part in their own health. We believe
the articles and information contained herein are true, but are not presenting
them as advice. We, personally, have found that a whole food vegan diet
has helped our own health, and simply wish to share with others the things we
have found. Each of us must make our own decisions, for it's our own
body. If you have a health problem, see your own physician.

Fair Use Notice: This document, and others on our web site, may contain copyrighted
material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners.
We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use
of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).
If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use,
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.