Talk to any liberal, and you will soon realize that no one actually knows what they are supposed to believe.

Here is a sample conversation between a liberal and a regular American about the Russia scandal:

Regular American: So, what’s the deal with Russia?

Liberal: Trump colluded with Russia because he is sympathetic towards their interests.

RA: Wait – that is not what you said last week. I thought Putin was blackmailing Trump because of the dossier.

L: Well of course. Putin wanted dirt on Trump.

RA: Even though the dossier came from an American political firm and a British guy? Even though Hillary was supposed to win?

L: None of that matters. Russia hacked the election.

RA: And decided to make Trump lose the popular vote, for fun I guess?

L: Yes… No. I don’t know. Michael Flynn. Whatever CNN says.

After enough pressure, the liberal will turn into an incoherent anti-Trump mess. Soon enough they will be saying that Trump actually is Vladimir Putin, or something preposterous like that.

All of this inconsistency is due to the fact that the mainstream media constantly changes its narrative as soon as an old story is debunked. This has been the case since even before the 2016 election.

Thankfully, at least some of the liars in the media are finally being held accountable for their lies.

As reported by The Wrap:

Three CNN employees have handed in their resignations over a retracted story linking President Trump to Russia, the network announced Monday.

The article was removed from CNN.com on Friday after the network decided it could no longer stand by its reporting.

“In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on CNN.com, CNN has accepted the resignation of the employees involved in the story’s publication,” a network spokesperson told TheWrap in a statement.

On Thursday, CNN investigative reporter Thomas Frank published a story involving an investigation into a Russian investment fund with possible ties to several Trump associates.

According to the network, an internal investigation found that “some standard editorial processes were not followed when the article was published.”

Something must have been really, really problematic here if the story did not meet the already paltry CNN editorial standards.

It is too bad that nothing of this sort happened sooner. Conservatives know that CNN stopped being a legitimate news source a long time ago.

Though it began as a network that revolutionized the news, it turned into a liberal propaganda machine over the coming decades.

CNN’s entire model is to sling mud at conservatives and hope that something sticks. If the network publishes enough fake stories, CNN assumes, at least a few of them will slip through the cracks and enter the public conscience.

This is how CNN operates and will continue to operate unless more “journalists” are held accountable for spreading fake news.

CNN needs to understand that just because they want something to be true, it does not mean that it is actually true. Though the network would surely receive high ratings during impeachment hearings, they simply cannot keep spreading false rumors about the president.

Mainstream media beware – we know your tricks, and if you keep them up, we will come for your jobs.