Search

Four of the men charged with committing the gang rape that horrified the world late last year have been sentenced to death. The ABC reports:

Three days after finding them guilty, Judge Yogesh Khanna said the case fell into the “rarest of rare category”, which justified capital punishment.

“In these times when crimes against women are on the rise, courts cannot turn a blind eye to this gruesome act,” he announced on Friday, adding in his written statement that the “ghastly” crime had “shocked the collective conscience”.

Signing his judgement, he broke the nib of his pen – a custom of judges to convey their hope that such extreme punishments will not be necessary in the future.

There have, the ABC reports, been widespread calls for the perpetrators to be executed, and the verdict elicited cheers, applause, and CNN reports that in the crowd that gathered outside the courtroom, “posters and banners held by those in the crowd read ‘hang the rapists’ and ‘a woman’s life is the foundation, do not defile it.’”

The victim’s father told reporters, “We are very happy. Justice has been delivered.” His daughter, during the brief time that she was conscious in hospital in Singapore, allegedly told her friends and relatives “of her desire to see her attackers burn to death.”

But not everyone sees this as a way of delivering justice, or of preventing this kind of crime from happening in the future. Mallika Dhutt, the president of Breakthrough, a global human rights group that does a great deal of work in India, says that while she understands the desire to see the perpetrators executed, that’s a “highly limited” kind of justice. The real solution, she says, is more complicated and more difficult, but will also be more rewarding:

…the death of the perpetrators will do little to change the lives of women in India, today or tomorrow. Real deterrents include appropriate policing, accountable government, and effective implementation of laws. But more than that, the best deterrent to rape is culture change: bold, steady, and persistent challenges to the norms and biases that enable and excuse violence against women.

“We need to make violence and discrimination against women socially and culturally unacceptable, in India and beyond — not just in the spectacular cases, but also in our everyday lives, homes, and interactions. We need to dismantle the biases that send girls into dangerous early marriages and prevent girls from being born — leaving some communities in India with so few girls that they must be trafficked in for men to marry. And men need to stand shoulder to shoulder with women to demand and make that change.”

Lawyers for the men have said they plan to appeal, so it’s not clear how this will be resolved, or when. But one thing is for sure: rape is happening every day – every minute of every day. It behooves us to figure out what the best solution is and to implement it yesterday.

New York, NY

Chloe Angyal is a journalist and scholar of popular culture from Sydney, Australia. She joined the Feministing team in 2009.
Her writing about politics and popular culture has been published in The Atlantic, The Guardian, New York magazine, Reuters, The LA Times and many other outlets in the US, Australia, UK, and France. She makes regular appearances on radio and television in the US and Australia. She has an AB in Sociology from Princeton University and a PhD in Arts and Media from the University of New South Wales. Her academic work focuses on Hollywood romantic comedies; her doctoral thesis was about how the genre depicts gender, sex, and power, and grew out of a series she wrote for Feministing, the Feministing Rom Com Review. Chloe is a Senior Facilitator at The OpEd Project and a Senior Advisor to The Harry Potter Alliance. You can read more of her writing at chloesangyal.com

Chloe Angyal is a journalist and scholar of popular culture from Sydney, Australia.

Title IX — the 1972 law that mandates schools remove gender-based barriers to education — requires colleges and universities to address the financial barriers to educational access that violence creates.

That means that if you’re a survivor of sexual violence (including rape, sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence, stalking, gender-based cyber-bullying, and sexual harassment), you have rights (regardless of your gender). Your university should both provide you with certain accommodations, like counseling or academic support, and make sure you don’t have to pay the financial costs of those accommodations.

The groups’ political arm plans to bring scores of students to Capitol Hill on April 29 to lobby for a requirement that the criminal justice system resolve [sexual assault] cases before universities look into them or hand down punishments.

There’s so much wrong here (not the least of which that the fraternity lobby’s proposal directly violates a longstanding civil ...

A few days ago, Germany’s highest court finally struck down a state law that had banned women from wearing headscarves in classrooms. But the decision, a victory after more than a decade of legal and public debate, is sadly an isolated sign of optimism within an increasingly bleak picture of Western countries marginalizing Muslim women for the way they dress.

Earlier this month, France’s women’s minister expressed support for a university-wide headscarf ban, arguing: “I’m not sure the headscarf is part of higher education.” (The fact that she is the country’s secretary for women’s rights is particularly awkward.) Her comments came as former president Nicolas Sarkozy proposed banning female students from wearing headscarves at all French universities. In Canada, Prime Minister Stephen ...

A few days ago, Germany’s highest court finally struck down a state law that had banned women from wearing headscarves in classrooms. But the decision, a victory after more than a decade of legal and public ...