They are both black holes. Stackhouse was more of one. From what I can recall Stackhouse had one move and couldn't go left. So I'd say Arenas was the better scorer. But Stackhouse was fairly unstoppable with that one move

In terms of consistent scoring over the years, it is Stack. But as far as being a prime superstar, it was Arenas, even if it was only for a few years. People forget that Arenas was once a top 10 player, imo at least. Stack never was.

You guys realize that prime Arenas is 29ppg/6 assists/4 rebounds on 45% fg, 37% 3pt fg, All-NBA 2nd team, popular enough to START at the All-Star guard spot over Vince Carter, on the cover of NBA Live 08 when Live was still the #1 basketball game, all while leading a playoff team and hitting game winning shot after game winning shot.

Stackhouse made the All-Star team once, a fringe All-Star during his prime.

It's literally two different levels of a player.

Live hasn't been the number 1 basketball game since 2001 you dumb ****.

But Jerry Stackhouse made a living out of scoring a lot of points on 2% shooting, on bad teams. Gilbert Arenas did step up in big moments, was the best player on a playoff team. And to be fair to him, if the coach has anything resembling testicles, he would have made him play the 2 and gotten some kind of PG.

Seriously, isn't Arenas like 6'4? Well built and not overly quick. Why was he playing the point? To have more license to shoot like an idiot, I guess.