kingcast955@icloud.com -- In the Civil Rights Justice system there are two sets of people: Those who are haters and those who fight back. These are their stories. Blink-Blink.
Movies: KingCast.net and KingCast65 YouTube -- A NENPA member news and information journal.

23 March 2017

26 August Update: 1. Hearsay is still inadmissible. 2. False accusations about racial antipathy and 3. apparent lie from Attorney Terry Johnson, or at least on his letterhead.....From Complaining Party's Surreply (I am having a difficult time loading up the revised updated document to Scribd so for now this is what you get):

Q: Hearsay: Should the OLR effectively strike any Hearsay or notion of Complaining Party being disbarred or that he "moved from state to state for the purpose of shamefully manufacturing incidents that he unsuccessfully tries to parlay into lawsuit and disciplinary actions"

A: Yes. First of all it is sloppy, sleazy and bad lawyering. Citation to what a police officer said about what Complaining Party allegedly said when said officer was derelict in his duties and never filed any report is completely irresponsible. Further, Complainant is not disbarred nor has he ever been disbarred. He is suspended but unlike Wisconsin attorney Richard Kranitz who committed wire fraud and served 18 months in Club Fed, Complainant has no criminal record WHATSOEVER. See Case No. 2013AP2128–D. (2014).

Second, Hearsay is not admissible in the Ohio Bar Disciplinary proceedings that Respondent uses to deflect attention away from his own conduct. To wit:

In Disciplinary Counsel v. Frost, 122 Ohio St.3d 219, 2009-Ohio-2870, a white female Civil Rights lawyer from Complaining Party’s hometown of Cleveland Heights, Ohio received stern rebuke for relying as Hearsay. Respondent stands in the same exact shoes, unless of course Hearsay is now admissible before the OLR but not before Ohio. Now honestly, THAT would be interesting, n’est-ce pas? From Frost:

{¶ 39} Moreover, respondent seems unable to understand fundamentalsevidentiary and procedural rules, a problem manifested by her disjointed efforts to present her case before the hearing panel.

When questioned about the firsthand knowledge she claimed to have of the improprieties she had alleged, respondent referred to having learned the information from “someone else” or by “looking at documents,” thereby erroneously implying that unreliable hearsay may serve as competent proof.

Third, the Record now reveals that Complainant was and is clearly a functioning member of this society with Mayoral awards and agreement with NH City Attorney’s office during the time period in which the bogus criminal complaints against him were being DISMISSED.

Again, Petitioner moved from state to state because he was a WIRELESS ZONING PROFESSIONAL and a LICENSED TITLE INSURANCE PRODUCER – thereby learning much about the mortgage industry that led him to this Deposition, ab initio.

Q: Would it matter if Complaining Party were prejudiced against White Males?

A: No. For the Record however Complaining Party told one of his sisters she should marry a white male who loves her and she did, and now 25 years later he’s still a great guy, fancy that. What is truly comical about this argument is the FACT that a white male himself stated that racism and reactionary politics played a role in Complainant’s suspension from law, and that is a FACT.[1]

[1]See also a letter written by Chris Hookway, a Republican white male who was Complaining Party’s business partner before the bogus criminal charges were brought. He hates bigoted white males as

much or more than Complaining Party does because negatively reflects on him. See Appendix A.

Q: Is the fact that Litchfield, Cavo settled the sexual harassment case of Klein v. Litchfield

Cavo relevant?

A: Yes. Not only because it goes to show how PARTNERS at a law firm conduct themselves but because Respondent’s sleazy lawyer Terry Johnson tells a lie:[1]

“What King has done is to cherry pick press accounts and allegations that the plaintiff made in the lawsuit, the accuracy of which Litchfield Cavo is contesting, and the accuracy of which King knows Litchfield Cavo is contesting.”

Bullshit. This case SETTLED as noted in the PACER screen shot below at the end of this very Q & A section. So Attorney Johnson -- who lent his letterhead to his brother Mark Rattan so he could lie in this proceeding -- is condoning Fraud Upon this Court after falsely claiming that Complaining Party was so doing. They throw around the word sleazy at Complaining Party well these men are as sleazy as it comes, attacking journalists and abusing their own white women, yet they expect the OLR to protect them.

Now then because of that apparent lie, here is precisely what is going to happen next:

Respondent and his Counsel – who are particularly fond of trying to implicate Complaining Party in fraudulent commentary – will now, within the next seven (7) calendar days, provide any and all official documents that prove their allegations referenced above using Attorney Johnson’s letterhead , again, i.e.

“….the accuracy of which Litchfield Cavo is contesting, and the

accuracy of which King knows Litchfield Cavo is contesting.”

If Complainant does not receive that information by next Sunday evening he will file an ethics complaint against Terry Johnson not because Complaining Party is prejudiced against white males, but rather because he will have earned it. Done.

[1] Query, is it Johnson or is it Rattan? Rattan signed off on the filing but Johnson lent the letterhead so when Complaining Party goes to make his next YouTube videos he is directly holding Johnson accountable.

The simple fact of the matter is that Litchfield, Cavo have been sued in Federal Court for being sexist pigs so that fits perfectly into this puzzle, along with Wells Fargo hired Counsel walking around calling people who look like Petitioner “niggers.”Klein v. Litchfield, Cavo 15-CV-03646, Cavo as reported by Above the Law, here is my email to the Office of Lawyer Regulation, Johnson and others:Yah if we want to play that game let's talk about a Name Partner and his sexism shall we?http://abovethelaw.com/2015/05/so-i-cant-tell-my-associate-to-do-more-to-satisfy-her-husband/ On that subject, another way to get to know your employees is to spend some time with their family. Defendant Eckert also discussed Plaintiff Klein’s sex life with her husband and said “I feel your pain, I don’t know how you’re married to Bari.” While each day the conversation would begin relating to work, Defendant Eckert would inevitably bring the conversation to relate to Plaintiff Klein’s personal life. Those conversations included questions about how often Plaintiff Klein had sex with her husband, how it felt to have sex in her parents’ home, why Plaintiff Klein did not have sex more often and asking if plaintiff Klein would ever cheat on her husband. ********* Apparently, Klein didn’t appreciate all this alleged great advice and asked her firm to do something about it. As Law 360 reports: Klein regularly told the firm’s partners about Eckert’s behavior, saying she felt she was being treated differently because of her gender, but nothing was done to improve the situation, according to the complaint. Klein had a “severe” panic attack one day in the office, but the firm did not call for an ambulance until Klein’s mother, who learned what happened, called one of the partners and demanded that her daughter be taken to the hospital. By firing Klein only five days after she returned from her FMLA leave, it will be difficult for Litchfield Cavo to argue that the two are not connected, her attorney, Jesse Rose, told Law 360 Tuesday. ***********But see, it wasn’t retaliation, the firm just thought she needed more time to recover and… yeah, I can’t push this pretense any more. Klein seeks compensatory and punitive damages of an unspecified amount and Litchfield Cavo and Eckert have a pretty dismal set of allegations to overcome. ........I suppose this is all my fault as well? The fact of the matter is, in my 52 years on this planet as a black man sensitive to the concerns of all minorities and people of moderate to lower-incomes (including many white males) I have come to know the presence of Hegemony, Racism, Sexism and that progeny of social anathema. Consider it as parallel to the Miller Test for obscenity, "I know it when I see it." And so it should come to pass that with a few key strokes in PACER I uncover this gem, fomented by another PARTNER. That corporate sickness trickles down folks, and it trickles right on down the tops of the heads of people like Mark W. Rattan, but not on my watch it doesn't. I have a history of exposing corruption and it is not about to stop now. Apparently I should have been spending more time in PACER to learn about nasty white men and the nasty white men who defend them. This one is going up on the blog and into the public SCRIBD document later today.

The effect a cameraman has on a subject is completely irrelevant. There have been video depositions for ages on end, and Petitioner has run video at them and publicly posted them. Petitioner has a right to take pictures, pure and simple and he never has had to ask permission to take a few stills but yet and still that is what I did. I had not violated any rules yet the Hearing Officer is treating me as if I am the problem, which is complete nonsense. Referee Winiarski then proceeds to browbeat Petitioner with the notion that he is illegally leaving his camera on but this is yet another red herring as Petitioner had already explained to him that he always turns his camera off during recesses as he has for literally hundreds of other occasions except for ONE TIME when there was an equipment malfunction because of a loose mechanism on the record on/off button. The way that Referee Winiarski and the Respondent treated Petitioner was abusive and patently ABSURD.But prior to this explosion the Referee had begrudgingly outlined the ambit of Petitioner's authority in this video."We will call him the press in this case...." Well that's good because that is exactly what Petitioner is. He worked for large daily and weekly press and now he is his own press. Welcome to the 21st Century. "Stop taking my picture, he is not allowed to take my picture." Again, FALSE. "I ask that this man be removed." "No." "My research shows that this is a public hearing and my research shows that he is allowed to be here. It borders on harassment when he sticks the camera in someone's face" ....states Winiarski as he states that taking pictures is intimidating and implores Petitioner to stand up when taking photos, failing to realize that he had already admonished Petitioner for standing up. This led Petitioner to note "I can't win for losing." Again, Referee Winiarski's Petitioner routinely runs video Depositions in rooms smaller than this and the proof has been provided. There was no need for the abuse tendered toward Petitioner from Respondent and from Referee Winiarski. As to Attorney Rattan Petitioner stated:"These are the issues of living in a free society.... that is his burden."

Update:Terry E. Johnson, a Principal at Peterson, Johnson & Murray is to represent Mark W. Rattan, Esq. You can best believe whenever I come around these blue-blood firms hire the biggest guns they can get, always a "super lawyer." That's fine. I'm a super lawyer too, but without the clout. And without the connections. But there's only so far clout and connections will get you when you have an asshat for a client, caught on video.So I'm ready. I sent a reasonable settlement Demand in that cannot be discussed and if they reject it, you get to watch it all unfold right here, and courtroom sessions will most definitely occur ON VIDEO, as I have shot in Wisconsin Courtrooms on prior occasion.

Query, as to the new Federal suspension of successful anti-establishment attorney Alison Motta, can anyone doubt that what Mark Rattan did in an open hearing was worse than muttering something under one's breath as she did in Federal Court? Her comment was not even fucking AUDIBLE but had to be boosted from the sound file. Unreal.

This is ridiculous. A verbal reprimand at most was warranted. The Court hates firebrands and those who defeat the system. I was an Assistant State Attorney and Federal litigator in the 90's and now shoot courtroom video and settle mortgages. Establishment judges and referees help establishment lawyers.... watch this video of a Milwaukee Wisconsin area lawyer just two hours away attack me without any punishment from a hearing officer. This matter is currently before the bar and will be the subject of First Amendment litigation.

Wisconsin is dirty. Watch this arrogant Wells Fargo attorney get away with assault and disorderly conduct last week. They actually ended up throwing ME out!!!! Follow the action here:OK So the Referee is James J. Winiaski Esq. who was in complicity with Mark W. Rattan, Esq -- the jerk who traversed 10' of room to attack me about a still-mounted (tripod) 3.5" Sony Action camera that was "in his face." He did this in direct violation of a specific Court Order because the banks and their attorneys cannot control my media and they are fearful of it. The Referee's failure to admonish him for his threatening and abusive actions that clearly constituted a breach of the peace under state and local code represents an unlawful Chilling of my First Amendment Rights and Responsibilities as a journalist. This is particularly true given his consistent "warnings" levied at me for no reason, simply for taking a handful of pictures from time to time. My picture count was low and I kept it that way so as not to offend. Ms. Nora has been practicing 42 years with nary an accusation of frivolous or sanctionable conduct. I was an escrow attorney who started Mortgage Movies Journal 6 years ago to document the fraud and unlawful foreclosures that I helped perpetrate and perpetuate many years earlier. The only other time I was denied access was in Maryland where they stole the Recorder of Deeds election from another honest person, a black man by the name of La Mar Gunn. He is the area NAACP president. Paul W. Schwarzenbart Esq. is the Office of Lawyer Regulation attorney who is prosecuting Wendy Alison Nora Esq, for being a solid advocate for the people and for exposing robo-signing, forgery and specific fraud upon the Courts. John Willian Verant Esq, is her attorney. Other tags include Stafford & Rosenbaum, Litchfield Cavo, Wisconsin Chief Justice Patience Roggensack, City of Madison Wisconsin, City of Milwaukee Wisconsin, Harley-Davidson, KingCast First Amendment, Free Press, Chilling Conduct, Assault, Prior Restraint, ACLU, Racism, Sexism, Mortgage Fraud, Foreclosure Fraud, Forgery, Robo-signing, Standing to Foreclose, ACLU, NAACP #JamesWiniaski #MarkRattan, #PaulSchwarzenbart #WendyAlisonNora #JohnWillianVerant #StaffordRosenbaum, #LitchfieldCavo #PatienceRoggensack #CityofMadison #CityofMilwaukee #HarleyDavidson #KingCast #FirstAmendment #FreePress #ChillingConduct #Assault #PriorRestraint #ACLU #Racism #Sexism #MortgageFraud #ForeclosureFraud, #Forgery #Robosigning #StandingtoForeclose #ACLU #NAACP

18 March 2017

An open letter to Kristina Robinson, Ahadu Amlakterda and Precious Paws LLC
#PreciousPaws #KristinaRobinson Sign the PetitionRead watchdogfordog Facebook page.The catchall journal entry.First of all Kristina let’s get one thing straight: You have not offered Elisa or me one goddamn thing. Not. One. You know I have electronic proof that we were paying clients and I have other clients of yours discussing barter arrangements with you that you raised yourself. So we paid cash AND barter, that’s the end of that nonsense. Next, after your same-night ramblings on 29 December 2016 in which you publicly admitted you may lose your license, you have never apologized to us. You never sent a card. You never bought flowers. You never offered to pay for cremation. You never offered to pay for another dog. All facts. And we now have a baker’s dozen complaints against you for endangering innocent dogs.
Now, after 2.5 months of you providing incorrect insurance policies to our Attorney Adam Karp, and both of your commercial carriers REJECTING your claim, your homeowners policy finally offers up $5,000.00. This after you initiated and attempted to maintain false harassment and stalking charges against me that were dismissed by the SAME JUDGE who issued an harassment TRO against YOU one year ago. The person I allegedly actually threatened didn’t even file a complaint and failed to appear with you in Court to support you.
While that was pending you went to Edmonds police and tried to get me found in violation and they summarily shut you down and you knew all along my comments were protected by the First Amendment.
Whether suing you at this point is worth it…… is debatable. There is no gag order involved in accepting this low-dollar settlement so we can continue to educate the mass public and City Councils about your misconduct and use some of that money to fund our writing contest in Livi’s honor. We can still sue Mountlake Terrace or Edmonds. Attorney Karp routinely obtains triple or quadruple or more for like cases but in this case we see you attempting to sell your van (at a grossly inflated value I might add) and various professional equipment. We are uncertain of any equity you may have in your home. So at this point we are reserving judgment on whether or not to sue you.
What I will not reserve judgment on is proceeding with measure alacrity in completely halting your operations when it comes to endangering innocent dogs. And yes the fact that you put your child in the front seat of your car in a front-facing position is directly relevant: It demonstrates lack of attention to safety or the law Kristina. I went to State Debate finals back in the 80’s arguing child restrain efficacy so don’t even go there with me. Lack of attention to safety has resulted in multiple injuries and the DEATH of our most beloved companion, and not only has your referral source written a public letter about it, another area professional from Great Dog flat out stated that you are the fault of Livi’s death and everyone knows it.
And unlike you, I don’t have any client complaints in my background and any other complaints about me that you are so fond of posting about on your silly little blog have all been DISMISSED. I am not a criminal, but you most definitely are and although your FORGERY conviction was somehow reduced to a traffic charge, you still failed to complete your community service and you still had three (3) bail revocations during that time period, disgusting. Lastly, in stating before Mountlake Terrace City Council that you felt bad for Livi but not for us, you demonstrate extreme narcissistic messianic tendencies that involve a complete lack of compassion. You had the nerve to look at Elisa and to mouth the words “sad” to her, with that petty little insouciant (look it up in case that word is not in your little lexicon) smirk you always wear. That sealed your fate with me right there. Also, I told you in Council chambers that you are a indeed a dog killer: You have placed many dogs in positions where they could die, and you killed Livi. You then killed Bullet, a dog I have on information and believe to be your least favorite. There was no official determination that Bullet was either an aggressor or that he had anything to do with Livi’s mauling and killing. By all accounts -- including Kristina’s -- Nova and Livi were the only dogs involved. So then AFTER Bullet witnessed this mauling and killing he gets into a fight with one of her other dogs. Query, which dog? The Report does not indicate. Was it Nova? Be that as it may, there is no identifiable explanation as to why Bullet was put down instead of re-homed or rehabbed.
Your actions in killing Livi and in your continued failure to demonstrate any sort of contrition (look that one up too). Now I have seen at least one very kind letter from one of your neighbors who cautioned you on your approach to life. You ignored her, and now you wind up facing me, not an enviable position my friend.
You have caused substantial emotional upheaval in our home, with physical manifestation relative thereto. And you don't care because as the Edmonds/MLT Animal Control emails indicate "You will do anything to get what you want," and your word is "to be taken with a grain of salt." You are complete scum and I will light you and your sorry-assed ILLEGAL operation up like a Christmas Tree.
I will light you and your sorry-assed ILLEGAL operation up like a Christmas Tree.
Put that in your blog and smoke it. With all the respect that is due, Christopher King, J.D. A/K/A Livi’s Dad

Sign the Petition at Change.Org to revoke Precious Paws Edmonds business license for using it to illegally shuttle dogs to an illegal, non-conforming use private residence, where our dog Livi the Wonderdog was mauled and killed by Kristina Robinson's own pit bull or pack of pit bulls, german shepherd and pit bull/basset mix.

So yah, you know it's about time to file a Malicious Prosecution Action against Kristina Robinson of Precious Paws, LLC Edmonds for bringing a false Stalking/Harassment Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against me when the alleged victim of the alleged threat didn't even file a complaint, and when Kristina then tries to go to Edmonds police on a purported violation of said bogus TRO to get me arrested and they tell her hell no, it's all Protected Speech pursuant to the First Amendment.

Malicious Intent? How about those "motherfuckers" that Kristina republished on her page.

To any City Official who offers us "condolences" with no investigative action

your words are nothing more than daggers to our hearts.

Kristina Robinson gave us enough daggers to last a lifetime

so take those gratuitous salutations and stick them in an appropriate place.

Mountlake Terrace Animal Control Officer Elena McKee

Sold her Soul to the Devil in Livi the Wonderdog Precious Paws

mauling and death at the hands of Kristina Robinson's own dogs.

Note: Read the four (4) simple Demands put to Mountlake Terrace City Council

above and right here. They involve Kristina Robinson's unproved employment record

proved lies regarding a prior attack at her own home with 30 stitches

and a $700 vet bill for Liko,another female dog kept in the company

of Kristina Robinson's pack of pit bulls.

This city has written our closing argument quite nicely:

"Once upon a time Elena McKee cared about the integrity of the system....."

From: Elena McKeeSent: Friday, February 27, 2015 2:14 PMTo: 'Paul Coleman'Subject:FYI
Paul,
We have a resident that is on my radar, Kristina Robinson (Amlak), and I’m keeping an eye on her Facebook page. Today I saw a post from Monday regarding a situation involving Lynnwood Police/Animal Control, I believe. She said a client of hers was possibly going to lose her dogs and wanted her to lie to the police on her behalf. I don’t know any more details but it looked like a Lynnwood resident that was in trouble.
Kristina Robinson runs a dog boarding business with a storefront in Firdale Village in Edmonds.She has drama wherever she goes and doesn’t hesitate to lie when it serves her purposes. If you are interviewing her or relying on any statement from her, take it with a grain of salt!Elena McKeeAnimal Control Officer
City of Mountlake Terrace5906 232nd St SW
Mountlake Terrace,WA 98043
425-744-6256*****From: Elena McKee Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 10:37 AM To: Paula Schwartz
Subject: Kristina Amlak's current Facebook thread Paula,
Here’s a copy of today’s posting from Kristina Robinson Amlak. She’s very obviously trying to be as antagonistic as possible and also trying to twist the whole situation into a race thing. I’ll keep an eye on the page and let you know if there is anything useful. Elena

McKee notes that Kristina and Ahadu "are not very nice and have harassed neighbors...."

But I suppose she's still more important to the city and Livi or us, nice to know.

*************So from these salient observations we now reach a point where Elena McKee fabricates a "family" relationship where it was permissible to leave our dogs alone with Kristina Robinson's own pack for 45 minutes. This in spite of common sense and the professional opinion of Emily Kilmer as submitted in this online running correspondence with City Officials, including attorney Greg Schrag, who has no Oath of Office and who hates to have his phone calls taped even though he purports to be a public servant.So from these salient observations we now reach a point where the City, knowing her penchant for lying, fails to investigate Kristina Robinson's biggest lie to date: She lied, before an open mic during a 4 January 2017 City Council meeting "I've been running this business for four (4) years without so much as one bite." Of course a thorough investigation may reveal that Nova was the primary attacker in Liko's case (see thumbnails) but perhaps that Crazy Moose Casino money, power and influence tied to Kristina's house, in connection with City Councilor Richard Vern Foos errr.. Seaun Richards explains all of that, as previously noted. Watch a February 2017 City Council meeting where I grill him on this via telephone.So from these salient observations we now reach a point where City Manager Scott Hugill lies and claims that Kristina Robinson did not make employment (mis)representations in a sworn context, or that they were not issued in conjunction with a zoning application but in point of fact, her comments were indeed submitted in connection to a failed zoning application for her at-home kennel services as seen below in another thumbnail.Read City Manager Scott Hugill's dismissive comments regarding the demands from Livi's mother (Elisa A. Bronstein) and me. My responses follow in the ellipses:

Good afternoon Mr. King,

Let me start by repeating my condolences for the loss of Livi. As a dog owner myself I certainly understand what our pets mean to us.

......Spare me the gratuitous salutations. As noted in the video from today:

I wanted to follow up on your correspondence of February 21 requesting that the City obtain and provide to you information regarding Ms. Robinson’s employment and veterinary records, as well your demand that the City Council work with the City of Edmonds and have Elena McKee reconsider her report.

At present the City has no legal action, current investigation or application pending that would require Ms. Robinson to provide her past employment records to the City, and as such the City has no authority to compel her to do so. Her representation regarding her past employment was not in connection with any application made to the City, nor were any of her statements made under any oath. The City took no action on Ms. Robinson’s request for the City to sponsor a zoning code text amendment that involved her business, and therefore there was no reliance on these statements.

......WRONG. It was submitted in her 2014 zoning application. Regardless of whether the statements were Sworn she also lied to you in City Council about "4 years and no so much as one bite" when in point of fact we have Liko with 30 stitches, $700 vet bill paid by Kristina Robinson by a mauling/biting most likely at her home, and her prior statement submitted to you that "I made a choice I've made before and this time resulted not in injury but in death."..... And of course the city refused to investigate any of that. Shame on you.