Monument ranchers seek buyout Cascade-Siskiyou cattlemen say they want out of their leases before a study
determines how grazing affects the area

By Michelle Cole

ASHLAND -- On a hot August afternoon Mike Dauenhauer found his stray cattle
exactly where he knew they'd be: beside the cool waters of a lake nestled in
the brown and green hills outside Ashland.

He let out a high-pitched whistle, nudged his horse, Quincy, into a dusty gallop
and herded the cows and their calves back to higher lands. Cattle have roamed
this fence-free range for more than a century, and Dauenhauer, 43, has chased
them since he was a boy.

The same places that draw cattle on summer afternoons are also havens for creatures
found nowhere else -- the Keene Creek pebblesnail, the Jenny Creek redband trout
and other species and subspecies so newly discovered that they have not yet
been named.

In fact, this Southern Oregon landscape where Dauenhauer and about a dozen other
ranchers run their cattle in the summer is so ecologically unique that President
Clinton on June 9, 2000, proclaimed it the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument.

Immediately, mining and timber cutting inside the monument were prohibited.
Grazing continued, but the president ordered a study of whether livestock, which
can be hard on the land, threaten the ecology of the area.

The study won't be completed for a few more years. Ultimately, the answer will
determine whether cattle -- and cowboys -- will remain in these parts. But Dauenhauer
and the other ranchers don't want to wait around for the results: They want
out of their leases, and they want to dictate the terms.

They're asking the federal government to buy back the leases allowing them to
graze cattle within the monument. And they want conservationists, who lobbied
so hard and so successfully for the monument's creation, to share some of the
buyback costs.

Under the terms of their current leases, the ranchers pay $1.43 per month for
a cow and her calf to graze within the monument. Nobody is saying yet exactly
how much the ranchers want for their leases -- at this point the numbers mentioned
range from $1.5 million to $4 million total.

In the end, the ranchers argue, it would cost taxpayers far less for the government
to buy out the leases than for a multiyear grazing study and the legal battles
that are likely to follow.

"It kills me to think I'd be part of a deal that would restrict grazing
up here forever," Dauenhauer says. But he feels he has little choice. Without
a buyout, his operation could lose critical summer forage with no compensation.

"Grazing on the monument will end up here at some time, in my opinion,"
Dauenhauer says.

Whether a buyout happens, he says, "has a heck of a lot to do with what
I'm going to do with my future."

The Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument is the nation's first monument designated
in recognition of its biological diversity. The Bureau of Land Management credits
the area's "remarkable ecology" to its location at the crossroads
of the Cascade and Siskiyou mountain ranges. It extols the 111 species of butterflies
found here, including the rare mardon skipper.

But the BLM does little more than offer a color brochure to draw tourists to
the area.

"It's not a monument we're promoting to visitors as a destination in itself.
It's a special biological area," says Howard Hunter, assistant monument
manager.

Besides, much of Hunter's time these days is consumed with the grazing study.
The BLM has spent just under $1 million to date, he says. Land managers have
fenced off 13 1/4-acre test plots within the monument. A team of outside scientists
has reviewed the BLM's study design.

The results of the study will not be available until 2006. Even then, Hunter
says, it will likely be years before the government issues a final decision.

The World Wildlife Fund also has hired scientists to measure the effects of
grazing on plants and wildlife in the area.

For rancher Bob Miller, 64, both studies are swords hanging over his head. In
his mind, they threaten the final blow to his operation.

Miller, who grazes cattle on the south side of the monument, near the California
border, pumps an angry fist in the air when he talks about people who claim
the low rates ranchers pay to graze on public lands amount to "welfare
ranching."

He argues that the government promised ranchers long ago: "If you come
out and put your blood, sweat and tears into the lands, we'll give you the rights
to graze."

But now Miller says stream and other wetland protections prescribed by the Northwest
Forest Plan and additional restrictions tied to the monument designation make
it difficult for ranchers to earn a living.

Over the years, ranchers have voluntarily decreased the number of cattle they
graze on the monument to satisfy environmental restrictions, he says. Today,
the BLM estimates that there are 605 cattle roaming about 51,000 acres of public
land.

Aside from environmental regulations, Miller says, ranchers who run cattle in
the area face "a mind-set" that's difficult to fight.

"There are people who have bought the program that says, 'Cows are bad
for the environment.' And they don't want them under any circumstances on public
lands," he says.

Four generations of Miller's family have run cattle on the oak savanna and in
the old-growth conifer forests. Cattle used to roam through this area and they
didn't bother anybody, he says.

Lately, however, complaints have increased along with the number of homes and
vacation cabins being built on private parcels sprinkled throughout the monument.

At age 90, Joe Dauenhauer says he remembers when cattle were the "kings
and queens" up here.

"Now you can't drive cattle on the highways anymore," he says. "People
get impatient."

Conservationists raised the idea of a buyout of grazing leases within the Cascade-Siskiyou
monument years ago. But ranchers were both distrustful of and insulted by what
they considered to be low-ball offers.

This spring, the ranchers started talking again to Dave Willis, executive director
of the Soda Mountain Wilderness Council, and to Andy Kerr, once the most-despised
forest activist in Oregon who now represents a coalition of environmental groups
promoting a voluntary national buyout of grazing permits on public lands.

The longtime adversaries have discovered at least one mutual goal. Conservationists
want cattle out of the ecologically sensitive monument. And the ranchers are
ready to leave.

Both sides agree that the ranchers should receive compensation so they can lease
or purchase other summer pasture.

"Making these guys whole is socially just," Kerr says.

The ranchers and conservationists have not yet agreed on whether the conservationists
should cover some of the cost of the buyout.