You linked to a page in the lab but there is no attribution information in that page. I am suspicious of such pages since they are typically repro's of pages ranging in the pastures of the internet. If it's not yours, then say so. If it is yours, then attribute it to yourself. I will usually write 'study by Roy' or something that says this is my scratch sketch, and not someone else's in new clothes. If it isn't mine, then why should I mind crediting whomever it belongs to?

And we're going to believe that you dreamt this up, all by yourself? Give us some credit and take a little less yourself. Please. Let's be honest here, and credit others upstream who feed us with ideas and mechanics.

For something to be truly random, it cannot have any predictability, only probability, much like a photon is not predictible, but we can venture where it is more likely to be (the double slit experiment, as an example). What I was pointing out above is that false inputs could produce expected results. Our algorithm would need to be hardened against such eventualities.