DNA samples are the new fingerprints

District attorneys are at the Capitol today, making that case that the state’s DNA database should be expanded to include felonies and misdemeanors. Advocates of the measure, which is expected to pass the Senate today, argue DNA is the modern equivalent of fingerprinting, and has been invaluable in getting convictions or leads in unresolved crimes.

“It is impossible to overstate the importance of expanding the New York State DNA databank to include DNA collection upon conviction for all Penal Law crimes — felonies and misdemeanors,” said Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr. “Forensic advancements like DNA testing are crucial in identifying suspects and solving cold cases, especially unsolved homicides and sexual assaults. DNA from all Penal Law convictions would keep predators off our streets, prevent violent crime, and bring justice to victims. The survivors joining us in Albany fought for their lives, and now are fighting for justice for all victims.”

“All Crimes DNA is solid science based public safety policy. No victim of crime or their family should endure the pursuit of a wrongful conviction and no violent offender should avoid punishment because of that lack of vision,” said Rensselaer County DA Rich McNally.

“It’s time for the law to catch up with technology,” said Richard Aborn, president of the Citizens Crime Commission of New York City. (He did not attend a 2 p.m. press conference, but sent a supporting statement.)

They were supposed to be joined by Law & Order star Mariska Hargitay, who prosecutes sex crimes on TV and has a foundation to support their victims. She could not attend due to a family emergency.

The NYCLU feels the bill is an unnecessary intrusion. Its opposition is traced out here.

“On Law & Order or CSI, DNA is infallible. Unfortunately, in the real world, things aren’t so simple; the possibility for error, fraud and abuse exists at every step from the moment a DNA sample is collected,” said NYCLU Legislative Director Robert Perry. “New York’s DNA databank was created in 1994. It has been expanded repeatedly, the science and sophistication have advanced, and yet lawmakers have not even begun to think about what’s required in terms of regulatory oversight and quality assurance standards that are required to ensure the integrity of the databank and the use of forensic DNA evidence.”