Email Disclaimer

DO NOT SEND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.

This website presents general information about Polsinelli and is not intended as legal advice nor should you consider it as such. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Please keep in mind that merely contacting Polsinelli will not establish an attorney-client relationship. Polsinelli cannot represent you until the firm knows there would not be a conflict of interest, and the firm determines that it is otherwise able to accept the engagement. Accordingly, please do not send Polsinelli any information or documents until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you get authorization in the form of an engagement letter from Polsinelli. Any information or documents sent prior to your receipt of an engagement letter cannot be treated as confidences, secrets or protected information of any nature.

Polsinelli uses cookies to improve site functionality and provide you with a better browsing experience. Detailed information about the use of cookies on this Site, and how you can decline them, is provided in our privacy policy. By using this Site, or clicking “Accept" you consent to the use of cookies.

Search Intelligence

On July 12, 2015, the state of Wisconsin passed a budget that, along with many expected cuts, additions, and tweaks, unexpectedly repealed Wisconsin’s False Claims for Medical Assistance Act—the state’s version of the federal False Claims Act (FCA). The Wisconsin statute, which is a “Medicaid only” law (meaning that it prohibits only false claims submitted to Medicaid), provided significant protections to whistleblowers and allowed them to claim up to thirty percent of awards.

What is perplexing about this repeal is that it took place without any hearings or public debates and without any explanation by the lawmakers who introduced the bill. The amendment simply read, “Section 945n. 20.931 of the statutes is repealed.” Moreover, the repeal comes at a time when most states are bolstering whistleblower protections and incentives through passage of their own versions of the federal FCA. Although the repeal will save Wisconsin the cost of investigating qui tam cases filed under the statute, it is generally accepted that investigation costs are more than offset by funds that are ultimately recouped in settlements and judgments.

Because a significant portion of Medicaid funding comes from the federal government, claims of Medicaid fraud in Wisconsin may still be brought under the federal FCA. Thus, while this development reduces state resources available to whistleblowers, the federal government retains jurisdiction to combat fraud in Wisconsin’s Medicaid program.