Several writers of my acquaintance, such as Allen Ginsberg and Ed Sanders, developed the habit of keeping extensive files of press clippings on stories of personal interest. Noam Chomsky, we’re told, does the same thing. An individual news report may mention something in passing that may seem secondary to the main narrative, but when multiple stories collected over time repeat the same seemingly secondary data, important patterns can become apparent.

For example, for many years Ginsberg clipped New York Times articles having to do with the international traffic in narcotics. This collection eventually served as one of the sources for historian Alfred W. McCoy‘s definitive study linking the heroin trade to U. S. government agencies, The Politics of Heroin.

Now, amid the sickening media parade endlessly looping, one aspect of the mass shooter phenomenon is continually skipped, but a survey of press reports on the spate of bizarre violence that has arisen since the 1990s reveals a pattern.

In the past few days, following the Newtown murders, various experts have weighed in on the difficulty of profiling the mass shooter type. (An accurate psychological profile, presumably — and hideously problematically — could enable parents, teachers, doctors, and law enforcers to predict which individual is headed toward being the next shooter.)

Despite the difficulty of such profiles and predictions, there are two things that such characters have in common. First, they are mostly young white males. Second, many of the perpetrators are reported to have been taking psychoactive prescription medication.

It is important to note that this site is not peddling some conspiracy theory. It is not speculative at all. The website is an index to reputable sources reporting on actual criminal cases, and inall cases reported, prescription meds are implicated.

The articles show that these violent acts were perpetrated by consumers in the 50 billion dollar a year selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) industry. This is a class of drugs whose warning labels and pharmaceutical literature note that a small percentage of SSRI consumers fantasize about and/or exhibit extreme violence.

“Mass shootings, like the one that just happened in Aurora [Colorado], have become a recurrent nightmare that haunts the collective psyche. As the nightmare repeats, we see patterns emerging. One, which we don’t have confirmation on yet in this case, is that the shooter will almost always turn out to be on an SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor). For example, Colorado’s other most famous mass shooting, Columbine, was masterminded by 18-year-old Eric Harris who was on the SSRI medication Luvox. Here’s an index of shootings and the SSRI connection someone put together.”

“Tim Kretschmer . . . walked into Albertville Secondary in Winnenden, near Stuttgart, at 9.30am on Wednesday armed with a 9mm Beretta he had stolen from his gun enthusiast father and wearing a K4-Schutz bulletproof vest and the black fatigues of Germany’s elite forces, the Kommando Spezialkräfte. . . . He killed nine pupils at Albertville, all but one a girl, and three teachers, all women, in less than 10 minutes. He then shot and killed three bystanders as he tried to escape, before taking his own life after a shootout with police. . . . It emerged that Kretschmer had been suffering from depression . . . and receiving medication for the condition.” –-Scotland On Sunday, Edinburgh, March 14 2009.

“Hours before he walked into a Northern Illinois University lecture hall and inexplicably started a shooting rampage that ended five lives and his own, Steve Kazmierczak called one of the people he was closest to and said what would be a final goodbye. . . . [According to his girlfriend] ‘he was anything but a monster. He was probably the nicest, most caring person ever’. . . . [She said] he saw a psychiatrist monthly but stopped taking Prozac a few weeks ago. She said the medicine ‘made him feel like a zombie’.” —Chicago Sun Times, February 8, 2008.

What we might call the “zombie effect” seems to come up in many of these cases. Also common is that the violent behavior tends to occur when the patient is either having the dosage adjusted, or has just stopped taking the pills.

The “SSRI Stories” site notes the following.

“The danger of withdrawal from antidepressants and antipsychotics is well documented. The brain tries to compensate for the blockage of the serotonin and dopamine receptors by growing additional receptors for these neurotransmitters. When the medications are discontinued, these additional receptors contribute to an ‘overload’ of serotonin and dopamine flooding the receptor. This is known as ‘supersensitivity psychosis’ and ‘antidepressant discontinuation syndrome’.”

“BEMIDJI, MINN. — Jeffrey Weise had ‘a good relationship’ with the grandfather he shot and killed on Monday as prelude to his deadly assault on students and others at Red Lake High School, according to relatives who are struggling to understand what might have pushed the teenager from sometimes bizarre behavior to mass murder and suicide. . . . They wondered, too, about medication he was supposedly taking for depression, and a recent increase in his prescribed dosage. . . . 60 milligrams a day of Prozac.” —Star Tribune (Minnesota), March 24, 2005.

Consistent with the “zombie effect” noted above, many sources indicate that some perpetrators who survive their crime scenes report being in a dreamlike state in which they feel they are watching their actions but not in control of them. Some of the literature notes sleep disorders, and speculates that the drugs induce a state of waking dream in which one becomes a passive witness to one’s actions. (Christopher Pittman, who killed his grandparents and set fire to their house told his father afterward that it had been like watching a TV show.) Other sources say the shooters do not remember their crimes or do not associate themselves with what occurred.

“Huntsville, AL. — 15 year old Hammad Memon is free on bond, awaiting trial on murder charges for the February 2010 shooting death of fellow Discovery Middle School student Todd Brown. . . . Memon has a history of being treated for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Depression. He was being medicated with Zoloft and other drugs for the conditions. . . . Memon’s mother is quoted as saying ‘My son is not normal. He is immature (mentally) for his age. He has become very depressed and withdrawn for the past 2 years, especially in the last 12 months. He does not have insights into what crime he has committed’.” —The Free Republic (Alabama), Feb 5 2012.

“CARTHAGE, NC — Jurors in the Robert Stewart murder trial reached a verdict Saturday. He was found guilty of eight counts of second-degree murder in a shooting rampage at a North Carolina nursing home in 2009. . . . Stewart’s defense lawyers said the 47-year-old was essentially sleepwalking at the time due to taking a combination of prescription drugs. . . Defense attorney Jon Megerian said Ambien and other drugs in Stewart’s system caused him to be in a zombie-like state of mind when he entered the nursing home. . . . In pleading Stewart’s case, his defense said he was full of remorse, but couldn’t remember anything. –WTVD television, North Carolina.

“STAMFORD, CT — A Stamford lawyer who shot at a motorist, then broke into his ex-wife’s house was found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect yesterday. Eric Witlin, 40, will be committed to Whiting Forensic Institute for evaluation until he returns to court July 14. Judge Richard Comerford could commit Witlin for the time he could have been sentenced to prison, a total of 70 years. . . . Two psychiatrists, including one hired by the prosecution, testified that Witlin suffered a psychotic episode brought on by Adderall and Prozac, which were prescribed to treat attention deficit disorder and depression. . . . Senior Assistant State’s Attorney James Bernardi said Witlin’s mental state on the night of the incident was uncontested, since both psychiatrists agreed. —Stamford Advocate, May 20, 2008.

“Anna L. Tang, the troubled former Wellesley student, is finally free to resume her life and has been discharged from court custody. . . . Tang came to the attention of most MIT students in October 2007 when she stabbed her ex-boyfriend, Wolfe B. Styke, then a freshman, in his Next House dormitory room. . . . Tang has bipolar disorder, which she sought help for when she first arrived at Wellesley in 2005. At that time, she was diagnosed with depression and was prescribed an antidepressant. However, as Tang’s psychopharmacologist Michael J. Mufson testified during the trial, bipolar disorder cannot be treated with antidepressants. Doing so creates oscillatory behavior. ­ ‘It made her lows lower and her highs get higher’, Mufson said. That combination of misdiagnosis and mistreatment led to her attack on Styke. Judge Henry found in December that Tang lacked the substantial capacity to conform her actions to the requirements of the law and that she lacked the capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions. The Tech (MIT student newspaper), Feb 8, 2011.

In other legal news, there have been some 450 suicide-related lawsuits settled out of court by GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of Paxil.

“Since Paxil came on the market in 1992, there have been three separate types of failure to warn lawsuits filed: birth defects, suicide, and addiction. Roughly 150 suicide cases were settled for an average of about $2 million, and about 300 cases involving suicide attempts were settled for an average of $300,000, according to a December 14, 2009 report by Bloomberg News. Glaxo paid an average of about $50,000 each to resolve about 3,200 cases linking Paxil to addiction problems. . . . All total, Glaxo has paid out close to $1 billion to resolve Paxil lawsuits since the drug came on the market in 1992. The company’s provision for all legal matters and other non-tax disputes as of the end of 2008 was listed as $3.09 billion in its annual report.” —Dissidentvoice.org.

To summarize, FDA warnings, court finding, and too many news reports to count make a connection between one of the most widely prescribed drug types and bizarre, ostensibly “inexplicable” violence. And though there are thousands of sources and multiple vectors of association implicating the 50-billion-dollar business in SSRIs to some of the most hideous crimes of our day, the major media continue to spin their wheels about the “unexplainable.” This story needs to go viral. Now.

~~ Help Waking Times to raise the vibration by sharing this article with the buttons below…

Prozac or its scientific name Fluoexatine is 94% Sodium Fluoride, and here in the U.K the addition of this Poison into the water supply is nolonger in the hands of the different Water Companies, but instead The Primary “Care” Trusts, who continually assert drinking it saves teeth, we’ll forget about all other concerns!
Medication without consent!
So if you are on Prozac or not and you drink water(don’t forget it’s in food)beer ,wine etc, we are all been dosed.
and still even though they no we object the Water Boards on their websites tell us it’s harmless.
conspiracy?

* A well thought out & researched article…We’re still dealing with the scoin of I.G.Farben & it’s demonic Nazi tentacles…reaching right inside our collective minds,in real time, with their dank & fetid insidious sorcery to enslave us all, with their alchemical soup of poisons.

tal

Recent regulatory warnings about adverse behavioural effects of antidepressants in susceptible individuals have raised the profile of these issues with clinicians, patients, and the public. We review available clinical trial data on paroxetine and sertraline and pharmacovigilance studies of paroxetine and fluoxetine, and outline a series of medico-legal cases involving antidepressants and violence.
Here’s an interesting study:

Both clinical trial and pharmacovigilance data point to possible links between these drugs and violent behaviours. The legal cases outlined returned a variety of verdicts that may in part have stemmed from different judicial processes. Many jurisdictions appear not to have considered the possibility that a prescription drug may induce violence.

In order to get to the bottom of any problem one then must go to the root cause if we do not want something to happen again and sometimes there are many root causes. By fixing one we do not fix the problem. We simply put a band aid on the effect. Our problem may be that its too difficult to change the entire system because it will mean loss of jobs, loss of profits on your pensions or salary. We cannot destroy one strand of the web and believe that it no longer will be a problem.
Drugs are a major problem and if these drugs are a major problem then why do we not remove them? One might say money is the issue and the bottom line always seems to be about money. Big PHARMA (cause) DRUGS (cause) MONEY (cause) GOVERNMENT (cause) Society (cause) GUNS (cause) and I am sure there must be more. If you have an important well paying job with big PHARMA, GOVERNMENT or any COOPERATION or COMPANY then are your willing to step forward where you might loose your job to make sure no more kids get killed. My suggestion would be no. Not my kid, not a problem. SEPARATION (CAUSE). So many talk the talk but never walk the talk. We simply like to look good.
We always correct the EFFECT but never the ROOT CAUSE and so quickly do we forget the incident because now we have a new law and feel good that something has been done but the families who have lost their love ones (children) never forget and never feel good. By simply correcting the effects we simply create another law/s. Power is lost. It was suggested, to get to the root cause of most problems like this one, we must then follow the money. I would suggest that a spiders web is a good analogy. We never kill the spider we just change the web but the spider will just build another strand of web. Problem unsolved until the next problem. We never get to the spider we simply create another strand of web to catch the guilty and solve the problem so we forget those who have suffered until it is us who suffers. Maybe we should allow those who have lost children to gun violence to make the laws. I would see a huge outcry from most. If one wants results then we must change the system or the same will happen over and over again as it already has. Just one’s opinion.