im in the same boat - but how is this any better than NOAA.org? (where weather.com and probably 99% of all media resources get their weather reports from)

I dont see an advantage (although its a free limited membership - but otherwise $10 a year) with this rather than getting information straight from noaa - where they run worldwide weather simulation systems 8-9 times a day and you get their analysis in the forecast discussion?

I know from first hand experience that tv producers at the weather channel will not use temps from weather.com because they are not accurate. I can't say that wunderground is anymore accurate even though they are also owned by the weather channel now.
Weather.com is slap full of ads, they keep popup blockers in business.

I know I can select the weather station that I want from about 5 choices within two miles of my home. The news usually uses the coastal and inland for temps. I am in between but closer to inland, with this I can pick my particular area. If you play with the site it also has a lot of historical data that can be found.

I know from first hand experience that tv producers at the weather channel will not use temps from weather.com because they are not accurate. I can't say that wunderground is anymore accurate even though they are also owned by the weather channel now.
Weather.com is slap full of ads, they keep popup blockers in business.

if you use adblock from firefox plugin no ads ... that's why i don't see ads on facebook when i logged in... it works