If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Qt already works in all platforms. Why would anyone wrap the Qt SDK in a layer of cheat?!
Are they trying to fork Qt? They've already patched it to run their crappy display server, how much crap have they added to Qt so it doesn't compile to windows and mac?

Every single piece of cheat they create only runs on Ubuntu and they all run like cheat. Unity, Mir, Ubuntu One, Software Center, Compiz/unity, Launchpad...

BTW, I've just discovered I can't install Ubuntu One in other distros. And that crap runs like cheat on Android and Windows.

I'm not lying. Here is Qt SDK avaiable for Linux, Mac, Win http://qt-project.org/downloads.
And when they bundled Qt SDK with their shit, it's Ubuntu only. Here is a slogan:
"Qt with Shit?, only on Ubuntu."

Comment

I don't understand. They talk about porting, but then the idea is just do what anyone would do when their platform they want to code for is not supported by the SDKs that run on their preferred system: run the system on a VM. What's the point on 'porting' if you end up doing that? Or is 'VM' used as in JIT compilers and such?

On another subject, this

potentially just not for ruinning apps but also for the development environment.

Made me smile.

Comment

I'm not lying. Here is Qt SDK avaiable for Linux, Mac, Win http://qt-project.org/downloads.
And when they bundled Qt SDK with their shit, it's Ubuntu only. Here is a slogan:
"Qt with Shit?, only on Ubuntu."

They simply made the Ubuntu plugins for Linux. Now that they are confident that it works, they can port it to Mac and Windows.

That is the very same method that Sailfish took. Their SDK was initially only available for Linux, then they made it available to Windows and Mac. Why weren't you raving and ranting about Sailfish then?