tough call........i am not a fan of invoking the "out of respect for the loved ones" shield to curtail any real discussion on the matter because the event affected everyone.......not just those who lost someone, not just americans either. the entire world was changed on that day. many soldiers from all over the world have lost their lives in the retaliation for the attacks. i think any country that has sent troops to war because of 9/11 have a right to question all they want what really happened.

is the mythbuster forum the place for the debate? probably not. nor any other discovery network channels and their forums. they have spent a great deal of money on programs and experts who have debunked the 9/11 conspiracies...........to them its a settled deal. if you want real discussion on the matter there are far better places for it.

tough call........i am not a fan of invoking the "out of respect for the loved ones" shield to curtail any real discussion on the matter because the event affected everyone.......not just those who lost someone, not just americans either. the entire world was changed on that day. many soldiers from all over the world have lost their lives in the retaliation for the attacks. i think any country that has sent troops to war because of 9/11 have a right to question all they want what really happened.

is the mythbuster forum the place for the debate? probably not. nor any other discovery network channels and their forums. they have spent a great deal of money on programs and experts who have debunked the 9/11 conspiracies...........to them its a settled deal. if you want real discussion on the matter there are far better places for it.

i think that both concrete and psiman are right.... 1.closer to the truth...2.and out of their scope of expertise.....discovery channel is a money making venture...and alienating potential viewers by taking a perceived radical political stance...is bad for business

plus Larry Silverstein owns the discovery channel....( )

i think that both concrete and psiman are right.... 1.closer to the truth...2.and out of their scope of expertise.....discovery channel is a money making venture...and alienating potential viewers by taking a perceived radical political stance...is bad for business

So, myth busters and the discovery channel want no further involvement?Personaly. This is a statement that means some people are getting close to answers and others are washing their hands of it to look credible.

maybe thats why all the distractions in the world now to try to keep us chasing our own tail.

good post concrete. I think thats absolutely why.

[quote]So, myth busters and the discovery channel want no further involvement?Personaly. This is a statement that means some people are getting close to answers and others are washing their hands of it to look credible.[/quote] maybe thats why all the distractions in the world now to try to keep us chasing our own tail.

All posts and media uploads are expressed opinions of the contributing members and
are not representative of or endorsed by the owners or employees of Disclose.tv.

This site may contain copyrighted material. Members may make such material available
in an effort to advance the awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights,
economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We
believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in
section 107 of the US Copyright Law.