Earmarks migrate political power from the people to the government.

First, what, exactly, is an earmark? It is a very specific line item on a Bill; a Bill is a proposed law
until it is passed by both houses of Congress and signed by the
President, when it becomes a Law. These very specific line items are
quite legitimate, when and only when they refer to details of how some
portion of the financing is to be spent to achieve the specific
objective of the Bill. For instance, how much of the total proposed tax
expenditure is to be spent on the design phase of a new aircraft
carrier, and exactly how much might be spent on steel for it, and so
forth. When all of these line items are specifically related to the
object of the Bill, they are legitimate line items. In my terminology (not that of Congress) this is not an earmark, but just another line item.

When a line item is not related to the object of the Bill, it is an illegitimate line item, or, again in my terminology (not that of Congress) this is an earmark. To me, and to most of us, specific line items directly related to the object of the Bill are not earmarks; line items not related to the object of the Bill are earmarks, they are quite illegitimate, they are corrupt and corrupting.

Second, how, exactly, did earmarks come to be? The first time an earmark was ever attempted to be passed, it was vetoed by James Madison in 1817, with the explanation:

Such a view of the Constitution would have the effect of
giving to Congress a general power of legislation instead of the defined
and limited one hitherto understood to belong to them, the terms
'common defense and general welfare' embracing every object and act
within the purview of a legislative trust.

Since then, U.S. Presidents have either been not as astute, or they have been involved in the process, for earmarks have just been allowed
to be very quietly slipped in and attached to completely unrelated
Bills, beginning in the 1970s. The 1970 Defense Appropriations Bill
passed into law with 12 completely unrelated, and therefore completely illegitimate
earmarks. The 1980 Defense Bill had 62, and by 2005 it grew to 2,671.
Of course, once the rest of Congress caught on, the illegitimate
earmark game spread beyond Defense Bills. The 2005 Transportation
Appropriations Bill passed into law with 6,371 earmarks.

Third, so what? Aren’t they necessary? At the local level, where the Federal tax money is to be spent, perhaps,
but the local citizens or their representatives were never even asked.
At the Federal level, where the tax money for it is collected,
absolutely not. The real problem here is that each of these earmarks adds cost,
meaning citizen tax dollar expenditure, to the Bill. If the objective
of the earmark is something other than the objective of the Bill, it
should not add any cost to the objective of the Bill. Period. It
doesn’t even belong in the Bill.

It does violence to the Rule of Subsidiarity. Congressmen could never
get their local constituents to vote in any of these specific earmarks
and the related local tax increase on themselves to pay for them. Or,
perhaps they prefer to not even try. Local projects involving local
expenditures should legitimately be addressed at the local level, not at
the Federal level.

These earmarks are virtually never discussed openly. They
represent sneaky, underhanded politics, and purposeful deception of the
public. What the hell did a brown tree snake eradication program on
Guam have to do with the 2005 National Defense Bill? What the hell did a
deer avoidance program in Weedsport NY have to do with the 2005
National Transportation Bill?

Fourth, earmarks represent such a small fraction of the total Bill, which is, of course, desperately needed right now,
that the voters do not care about them as an issue. The terrible thing
about this popular and sneaky political argument, often heard from the
“professional” politicians of both Parties, is that it is largely true.
The citizens are mesmerized into thinking that the money their
Congressman just got for their little neighborhood is free. In
fact, it is not free; it comes out of the Federal taxes that everybody
pays. To the locality where the funds are spent, they got a real deal,
because what they paid into the total Bill expenditure is miniscule compared to what is being spent in their local neighborhood.

Because they got a local benefit at no local tax cost, the locals
think they got a real deal. But what they fail to realize is that they,
too, are paying for brown tree snake eradication on the island of Guam,
an item they have no interest in, either at the local or federal level.
Federal money should not be spent on local issues; that’s just common
sense. The local citizenry are paying their share into every single Federal Bill, and into every single State Bill, not just the one that contained their little slice of illegitimate political pork.

Fifth, it has reached the point where Congressmen are expected to bring home pork; they campaign
on it; they promise it, and they deliver it. It has become a major
strategy in their personal political success. They love to tick off a
list of things they brought home to the locals at no local tax cost.
From a face-lift of the public library, to stocking trout in the local
river, to a new fire house, and on, and on. They spend a huge portion
of their working hours in Congress wheeling and dealing to agree to
someone else’s pet pork earmark and get others to agree to theirs.

It gets them re-elected. It makes them popular. It
adds to their resume and enhances their political future. The fact that
they are doing local politics at the national level is glossed over; Subsidiarity?
What subsidiarity? We don’t need no stinking subsidiarity. I can get
you whatever you need, Mr. Mayor, or Mr. Local Big Shot, or Mr.
Lobbyist; you just come right straight to me with all your needs.

Sixth, If a higher level of
government didn’t pay for it, it wouldn’t get done. Only the Federal
(or State) level is big enough to solve this particular local problem. No kidding. If that is true, well then, perhaps it is not a real
local problem. If the local populace is willing to pay for it, then
the local populace considers it a worthwhile thing to do. If the local
populace is not willing to pay for it, then, the local populace does not consider it a worthwhile thing to do. When it is deemed to be important enough, the local citizenry will express their willingness to pay for it. There is nothing difficult about this.

Who is the State or Federal Legislator or Executive to
decide, behind the backs of the local citizenry, that the local
citizenry has a problem that the local citizenry cannot solve for
themselves? The question that should be asked here regards whose idea
was this earmark, who will profit from it, and why it is not presented
to the town council, or the county commission, or whomever. Why go to
the Fed, or to the State? Only severe emergencies or disasters deserve
highest government attention, and even then only when local remedies are
overtaxed.

Seventh, the process is working, we
should just leave it alone, because nobody is being hurt by it. The
reasons that this notion is false are legion. To begin with, no
government tax expenditures come with no strings attached. Accepting
Federal a Federal hand-out invariably means accepting some Federal rules
of behavior. Many, perhaps most, earmarks are not just one-time-shot
earmarks, but ongoing, permanent changes in annual budgets, from now on.
Federal funding of local education is an example. If you accept any
Federal money, then you must religiously censor Christian exercise in
your local schools.

In more ways than one, earmarks cause a migration of
political and economic power from the local citizenry to the higher
level of government. Eventually, the government will be doing
everything, and the citizen nothing, except paying all the taxes. Any
time any higher level of government “gives” you some money, someone in
that higher level of government will, sooner or later, take an active
interest in and begin to direct you on how to spend it, under threat of
taking it back. Once the local citizenry becomes dependent upon the regular, annual earmark funds, there is a government hook in their jaw, and they are a little bit less free.

Eighth,don’t worry about it!
Let’s all gather round the Pork Barrel. This is the overriding
consensus opinion of Congress, including both Parties. It goes along
with don’t let the cat out of the bag. They don’t want us to
know how it works, and they keep a veil of secrecy around it. Earmark
money, touted publicly by politicians to be miniscule in the grand scheme of things, is, collectively, huge.
To paraphrase the late Senator Everett Dirksen, you know, “a billion
here, a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking real money.”

We are talking real money here, probably the biggest
contributor to the political Pork Barrel, which draws corruption like
manure draws flies. Politicians skim from it, lobbyists bribe for it,
special interests jump through hoops for it, contractors fight for it,
kickbacks are paid from it, legal and political backs are scratched with
it, at all levels of government and commerce. It’s sickening. The
smaller the earmark the more likely it is to involve corruption, because
the perpetrators hope no one will be interested in such a small
earmark. To each individual who gets a chunk of it, it’s very large
indeed.

It was our money.

How to stop it. Presidents and Governors
need to scratch out the earmarks and pass the Bill without any earmarks
each time they deem the Bill itself worthy of becoming Law. So long as
there is nothing in the Constitution to prevent them from doing it, they
should just do it. I doubt any State Constitutions prohibit such a
thing; the Federal Constitution does not. If there is or comes to be
such a limitation, then the whole Bill should be vetoed until it arrives
on the Executive desk without any earmarks.

Opponents will argue that there are too many needed earmarks that won’t be passed if we do this. Well, no shuckin’, Sherlock. They are not supposed
to be passed if the affected jurisdiction doesn’t want to pass it and
pay for it at that level. Why should a Nebraska farmer have to pay for
some project in Central Park New York? New Yorkers should be willing to
pay for what they consider to be worthy New York needs, and Nebraskans
should be willing to pay for what they consider to be worthy Nebraska
needs, and they each should be willing and even anxious to leave each
others taxes strictly alone.

The Rule of Subsidiarity
should always be applied. The scope, reach, power, size and cost of
higher government should always be reduced whenever it is possible to
reduce it.

=====

Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click a footnote link to see the gory details.)

Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic
Center to
Catholic American Thinker.

Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option
June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .

Regards,

Vic

Language and Tone Statement

Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to just stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our high Roman Catholic and Constitutional American standards of Truth, logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, obscene, blindly & doggedly anti-Catholic, anti-American, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, be prepared to back it up, keep it clean, keep it civil, and it will be published. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the Hard Left is what it always was, the New Leftist Liberals are what they are, and the Internet is what it is.

"Clickbait" advertising links are not acceptable for posting here.

If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information. Elitist Culturally Marxist Pure Authoritarians cannot and will not tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their rigid authoritarian, anti-equality, anti-life, anti-liberty, anti-property, hedonistic, anti-Constitution, pro-Marxist, pro-Islam, anti-Catholic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, anti-male, sexist, pro-homosexual, anti-heterosexual, anti-white, racist, anti-Western, anti-American, Globalist, anti-Nation, blatantly immoral, totally intolerant and bigoted point of view.

This Form cannot be submitted until the missing fields (labelled below in red) have been filled in

ADD COMMENT

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Silence in the face of evil is speaking. "We've had enough of exhortations to be silent!
Cry out with a hundred thousand tongues. I see that the world is rotten
because of silence." Saint Catherine of Siena

“An
error which is not resisted is approved; a truth which is not defended is
suppressed…. He who does not oppose an evident crime is open to the suspicion of
secret complicity.” – Pope Felix III

“Do not forget your purpose and destiny as God's creatures.
What you are in God's sight is what you are and nothing more”—Justice Clarence Thomas

"Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, then, is the sin committed by the person who claims to have a 'right' to persist in evil-in any sin at all-and who thus rejects redemption." Pope Saint John Paul the GreatDOMINUM ET VIVIFICANTEM

"Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it, and, indeed, to neglect to confound evil men-when we can do it-is no less a sin than to encourage them." Pope St. Felix III

If a purposeful violator of the Constitution who is a sworn officer of the governemt is not a domestic enemy of America and a traitor, then
there is no such thing, and the Constitution itself is without meaning,
and America has lost its grounding and its very purpose for being. Anti-American-Court

Live Interviews

"All the evils of the world are due to lukewarm Catholics." Pope Pius V

"All the strength of Satan's reign is due to the easygoing weakness of Catholics." Pope St. Pius X

Click the image above topublish your essay or article here,to be included among those below.

Submitted Articles andReprinted Articles

(Note: copyrights on these articles wherever present will supersede the WebSite copyright at the bottom footer of every WebPage)

Still Time To Get It Right. “Once you understand the role of energy in everything, you can begin to appreciate why there's simply nothing more important to get right. Energy is at the root of everything. If you have sufficient energy, anything is possible. But without it, everything grinds to a halt.” Chris Martenson

The Heresy of Chrislam. Those claiming that the “Allah” of Islam’s Qu’ran and Yahweh or God of both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible are one and the same are missing one glaring point: GOD NEVER CONTRADICTS HIMSELF.

Never be lukewarm.Life itself demands passion.He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input. Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.

NewsletterCatholic American ThinkerFree E-zine Subscription

Email

You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you theCatholic American ThinkerNewsletterand absolutely nothing else.

"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII

"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi

Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance
may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston
Churchill

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who
deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand

Atheist Genesis:

In the beginning there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing.
And then nothing accidentally exploded and created everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally encountered other bits of everything and formed some new kinds of everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into self-replicating bits of everything.
And then some self-replicating bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into dinosaurs.
See?

“ … for I have sworn upon
the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind
of man.” wrote Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush in
the year of our Lord 1800. The context
involved resistance to any form of Christianity or Deism legally imposing
itself throughout the USA. We must wonder what he might say
about our current government's forced imposition of strict secularism – i.e.,
anti-theism – throughout the USA. I submit that legally enforced secularism of society, like theocracy, like Marxism,
and like Islam, is, precisely, a form of tyranny over the mind of man.Nothing good can come from the religious cleansing of Judaeo-Christian society. Government imposed secularism is just another form of theocracy.