Fox News reporter Heather Childers posted some tweets asking her Twitter followers their thoughts on a couple articles related to Obama's eligibility. One article asked if Obama's campaign threatened to kill Bill and Hillary Clinton's daughter if they brought up Obama's eligibility during the 2008 campaign. The other article Childers tweeted was about the Alabama Supreme Court Justice that raised concerns about both of Obama's birth certificates which was headlined at this site then picked up by World Net Daily and then the Examiner. Needless to say that sent the Obama media thugs at Media Matters and Mediaite into a rabid frenzy.

Fox News senior VP for news Michael Clemente formerly of ABC News released a statement to Mediaite saying, "The tweets have been addressed with Heather and she understands this was a mistake." I guess Clemente missed her followup tweets?

It’s more than just groupthink; they’ve been threatened. I’ll repost this here rather than type it all out again:

The threats that Soros made were to the media companies heads. Those media heads told their on-air personalities that Soros had threatened to annihilate them with FCC and FTC harassment after the election if anybody or their guest reported on the eligibility issue - and the companies themselves told their employees that their careers would definitely be over if they reported on it, and the not-so-subtle implication was that their lives and their families lives were questionable.

So it was actually the media companies who threatened the employees - with certain loss of career and probable death of them or their family members.

I spoke with Mike Zullo yesterday and he said that the witnesses to these threats are scared stiff. They cant get witness protection until the feds are involved. Let me state the obvious here: Eric Holders stranglehold on federal law enforcement and Congress unwillingness to make ANY LAWS stick is resulting in normal people going about their everyday jobs being afraid for their lives and the lives of their families. Its really not an exaggeration to say that the USA has become communist Russia in many ways.

WE NEED TO PRESSURE CONGRESS FOR A HEARING ON THESE FINDINGS AND THE APPOINTMENT OF AN INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR.

Heres what I posted earlier, which contains links and other related information:

Im pretty sure Clear Channel was one of the radio media companies that was threatened in October of 2008 and again within a few months after the election.

My dealings with my local Fox radio station, KFAB out of Omaha, strongly suggested to me that the threats were extended all the way down to the local level.

What Soros is doing here makes Al Capone seem like a choir boy. This is total, tyrannical control over the airwaves of every square inch of America. I REALLY, REALLY hope Americans wake up to see whats happening here and decide not to let the Soros coup work.

For those who havent been following the story of the media threats, Ill re-post from a previous post:

The major media companies have been threatened - at least once before the election and at least once in the first few months after the election - with both FCC and FTC annihilation after the election if they reported about Obamas eligibility issue, and its claimed that Glenn Beck left Fox because the threats continued even after Beck ridiculed birthers but continued to report on Soros and Obamas ties to communists and Islamists. Beck couldnt provide protection for the lower-level staffers and Fox refused to provide protection and tried to stop him from exposing Soros ties because somebody from Foxs Board of Directors is tied to Soros financially.

Most people in the major media are in bed with Obama and Soros and their communist-Islamist alliance so they didnt mind the threats. Doug Hagman says thats actually what one witness said was brought out in one of the meetings where the media company told the on-air personalities that their jobs would definitely be lost and their lives and families lives were questionable if they reported on the eligibility issue.

But the threats were very real for the conservatives, which explains why were basically functioning without ANY media willing to cover the communist-Islamist coup currently taking place within our own country.

Those claims were made by Doug Hagman. Links are below. The transcript of Hagmans interview with Laurie Roth can be seen in Tom Ballantynes book Oh Really OReilly, for anybody who doesnt want to slog through 3 hours of audio. (update: It’s only a partial transcript. There is much more in the interview.)

Ill post here a comment I made earlier that gives the links for the Hagman information. I should also add that before I got confirmation of the accuracy of Hagmans claims from Mike Zullo personally, I constructed a timeline of events related to potential Soros threats, and based on that timeline I had already seen that Hagmans claims were very credible, which is why I reported them to Zullo and why he investigated them himself. (It was when I tried to forward my timeline to Zullo that my ISP informed me that my reply to Mikes e-mail couldnt be sent because the address failed; so I forwarded it to a go-between who forwarded it to him with no problem. Somebody with power to control the ISP didnt want me communicating with Mike about Soros threats.)

Those threats were actually basically repeated PUBLICLY when Media Matters told Ben Smith that they were conducting guerrilla warfare against Fox, trying to get British regulators to destroy NewsCorp - right after Hannity had agreed with Trumps statements that Obama should release a BC (which led to the release of what the posse has now confirmed is a forged BC).

Right, but if he depends on Clear Channel for anybody to hear him, they can tell him what to say.

And this is a critical issue because Soros has threatened the media companies - including both TV and radio - if they reported on the eligibility issue. The same day as Sheriff Arpaio had a press conference saying there is probable cause that Obamas birth certificate and draft registration are both forged, two of the most independent and effective conservative media entities received messages intended to be overheard by every reporter at that presser. Rush had the bomb threat situation. And just hours after interviewing Sheriff Arpaio, Breitbart was dead.

So the country isnt hearing that a law enforcement investigation found that Obamas records are forged. Theyre hearing that Limbaugh called a gal a slut.

What the MEDIA, though, is hearing, is that Soros meant what he said when he threatened them - because Soros is working on taking out anybody in the media who MIGHT HAVE reported on the crimes that Soros & Co have committed to take the White House and country by an illegal coup.

The media is scared spitless. WND has also reported on this now; a thread about it is at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2856160/posts. Doug Hagman had investigated that, and the posse has corroborated his claims. What Hagman said was that the media people he spoke to were scared - and that was long before this situation with Breitbart and Limbaugh.

It doesn’t surprise us - any more than the deleting stuff from my blog, etc surprises us. Sadly, we’ve come to expect it. Doesn’t make it any less of a pain though.

I laughed myself silly this morning when I read that the 5th Circuit judge gave the DOJ a taste of their own medicine - an assignment of at least 3 single-spaced pages clarifying their understanding of judicial review, due in about 48 hours. lolol.

Andrew Breitbart was fearless. He had spoken on the phone with Joe Arpaio, heard Arpaio’s evidence, and said that it was good evidence.... 4-5 hours before he suddenly dropped dead on the sidewalk, on the same day as Arpaio publicly reported probable cause for forgery and fraud regarding Obama’s BC and draft registration AND on the same day as Rush Limbaugh had a bomb scare.

Neither Breitbart nor Limbaugh reported Arpaio’s findings. Two different ways of shutting people up. Both effective.

“...this isn’t about Obama at all. It’s about the rule of law, and whether government crooks can do what they bloody well please without any way for the public to hold them accountable.”

I would add “...accountable PEACEFULLY.” Thank you for saying what must be said. Very few will even allow themselves to think that way, much less admit it publicly, but it is a conclusion to which I have been forced to acknowledge, and perhaps the only way to begin to correct the situation. Constitution=rule of law. Dictatorship=rule by executive order.

“There are things I dont like about John McCain, but the truth is that an Obama presidency will inflict the greatest disaster on this nation that it has ever seen. Four years of the haloed one will see a rebirth of the USSR here in the USA.”

I’d think you’d know better.

31
posted on 04/04/2012 8:32:32 PM PDT
by Hoosier-Daddy
( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)

Thanks. One problem I have with the little reporting that has been done on this issue is that it makes it seem like the reporters aren’t reporting because they’re afraid of the FCC. And we all know that Obama uses veiled threats of government harassment so this doesn’t seem so very new. But what the actual on-air personalities are afraid of is that they or their families will be KILLED. Because the media companies strongly implied that if anybody violated the orders to keep silent on this issue, not only their career but also their own life and the lives of their loved ones would be in danger.

I don’t believe for one minute that it was either an “accident” or a coincidence that on the day of Arpaio’s presser the big news was, instead, the sudden death of Andrew Breitbart and a bomb scare for Rush Limbaugh.

Now there are some articles talking about what the producer of “We Will Not Be Silenced” has said about the same kind of threats being used in the 2008 primary against anybody who opposed Obama - complete with the names of specific people in strategic positions who died in specific ways at specific crucial points. Those deaths are documented facts. The timing is an objective fact. The silence on this issue is a documented fact.

As somebody said about Breitbart - if Breitbart exposes what was feared he would expose, then he probably wasn’t assassinated. If he doesn’t, it was not only an assassination but an effective one. Well.... Breitbart had told Arpaio that Arpaio’s evidence was good mere hours before he died, and while Breitbart’s successors have said they will “vet” Obama on other issues, they refuse to touch the eligibility issue. That suggests that it was an effective assassination, and that what the assassins were really afraid of Breitbart exposing was the credibility of Arpaio’s evidence.

In similar fashion, the Clintons kept quiet about Obama’s ineligibility. That wasn’t just out of the goodness of their hearts. Something shut them up. The deaths of strategic people at strategic times - including a good friend of Bill Clinton.... would explain what we all noticed about their behavior.

No matter what people here say, Fox News is NOT left-wing or the MSM. Not by a long shot. The difference between them and others is they give conservatives a fair shake. The Chelsea story sound far-fetched, but Obama has been pushing violence for 3 years no.

35
posted on 04/04/2012 9:03:36 PM PDT
by PghBaldy
(Obama is afraid if he needs to start a fight with Catholics. He's losing the women vote!!!)

Fox has to have just enough “conservative” stuff to still have credibility - so people will buy into the Fox personalities’ mockery of the eligibility issue.

This is the same thing that Saddam Hussein did with CNN. He needed their credibility applied to his own propaganda so he gave them access in return for them just repeating his propaganda as if it came from them. Soros needs Fox to be credible with conservatives even while mocking the eligibility issue, or else he couldn’t get conservatives to go along with the mockery. If Fox became full-on liberal people would see the Soros takeover for what it was. So Soros’ plan had to allow mostly conservative stuff to still be said on Fox, in order to slip in, unnoticed, the real poison - the issue that had the potential to undo Obama. Eligibility.

If you read the last link I provided in a post I reposted in this thread, you’ll see that though the first censorship was over eligibility, Soros has expanded the coercion to disallow exposure of the Soros-Obama-czars connections to world communists and Islamists. The eligibility issue was the critical issue initially, but since finding out he has the power to run the Fox people like puppets, he’s increasingly using them that way.

Regarding the Obama/Soros and DNC shenanigans, there’s another article out by WND based on an interview of ANOTHER Hillary supporter/activist who notes the timing of 2 quick deaths right after Hillary’s supporters had gotten an agreement by those 2 individuals to present a petition that would have required the committed votes to actually be counted in the first round at the convention. That article is at http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/hillary-supporters-untold-obama-horror-stories/ and when you look at the timing the picture becomes much clearer. The shooting death was one day after the Bill/Hillary friend agreed to help, and the alleged aneurism while driving was 2 days after the woman agreed to help - both within 2 weeks of the convention. And the wife of the Hillary/Bill friend who was killed actually did the OPPOSITE of what her husband had agreed to do, which - together with Hillary’s own “gift” of NY’s delegates to Obama - gave the nomination to Obama. So something turned her around 180 degrees from honoring her murdered husband’s intentions.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.