Funny how Tebowites now consider him a TE but I am sure they had him competing for Brady's job just last week.

whatever fits their delusion. a months ago they argued he was not a TE and had no business switching positions..... but now that Thug Life seems to have flushed his life down the toilet, all of the sudden he is a big receving threat Has he ever caught a ball in traffic, with a LB or DB n him like glue? I know he lined up wide for the Jets a few times, did he ever actually catch a ball?

ABC News reports that Massachusetts State Police are planning to return to Hernandez's house for a longer, more extensive search today because they believe he may have tampered with evidence.

A police source told the network that Hernandez's security system was smashed - including the surveillance videos. He also handed over his cell phone to investigators 'in pieces.'On Monday, before Lloyd's body was found, he also hired a cleaning crew to scrub the mansion, the police source said.

You can keep arguing with me but you clearly know very little about either journalism or marketing. Violence, sex, wealth, fame, and money are "interesting" and therefore they "sell". In this case we have the violence, and we have the fame (although the average person probably doesn't know who Aaron Hernandez is). The writer adds a detail like the price of the house to bring another of those selling points explicitly into the equation. Really a very simple concept.

For such a simple concept you've got it all kinds of mixed up. Throwing sex, violence, fame, wealth and money into an article because you or those who might read an article will find them interesting in order to increase sales does not by any means increase the information provided nor the journalistic integrity of the piece.

There's a vast chasm between real journalism and marketing, and sirhcyennek81 clearly has a more accurate understanding of one of them than you do.

Okay, bro, you've got it all figured out. Who said anything about integrity? Go check out the article from the UK paper linked above. They did the same thing. And they do it for an obvious reason, which apparently isn't obvious to you.

For such a simple concept you've got it all kinds of mixed up. Throwing sex, violence, fame, wealth and money into an article because you or those who might read an article will find them interesting in order to increase sales does not by any means increase the information provided nor the journalistic integrity of the piece.

There's a vast chasm between real journalism and marketing, and sirhcyennek81 clearly has a more accurate understanding of one of them than you do.

Physically breaking a cell-phone is a very bad way of trying to cover anything. Cellphone companies can pinpoint the location using triangulation with cell towers, and flash memory is very insensitive to physical damage - the vast majority of the information on the phone should be able to be reconstructed if the memory chips are damaged and if they aren't (the most probably scenario) everything he has ever done with it is readily available.

You can keep arguing with me but you clearly know very little about either journalism or marketing. Violence, sex, wealth, fame, and money are "interesting" and therefore they "sell". In this case we have the violence, and we have the fame (although the average person probably doesn't know who Aaron Hernandez is). The writer adds a detail like the price of the house to bring another of those selling points explicitly into the equation. Really a very simple concept.

So you think having the headline "NFL Player sought for questioning in homicide" is not enough of a sell to make John J Public read the article? You have to put in how much his house cost? Its not pertinent to anything, other than to stoke up a bit of class warfare. Even if the murder happened there, the price of the property has nothing to do with it.

And arguing with you about it does not mean I lack understanding in how journalism or marketing works. The point of journalism is information. The point of marketing is to sell. The fact people feel news has to be sold is a ****ing problem.

Physically breaking a cell-phone is a very bad way of trying to cover anything. Cellphone companies can pinpoint the location using triangulation with cell towers, and flash memory is very insensitive to physical damage - the vast majority of the information on the phone should be able to be reconstructed if the memory chips are damaged and if they aren't (the most probably scenario) everything he has ever done with it is readily available.

Physically breaking a cell-phone is a very bad way of trying to cover anything. Cellphone companies can pinpoint the location using triangulation with cell towers, and flash memory is very insensitive to physical damage - the vast majority of the information on the phone should be able to be reconstructed if the memory chips are damaged and if they aren't (the most probably scenario) everything he has ever done with it is readily available.

That, and every bit of transmitted data can recalled from the provider...