Alexander the Great is pretty high up there, so is Genghis Khan.Can't forget Hannibal, though he was more of a general than a conqueror, but he did conqueror Spain and a few other places (and would've conquerer Rome had Carthage sent him some more troops after he destroyed most of the Roman army in the battle of Cannae).

Dud Doodoo wrote:Napoleon fought and won more battles than Alexander, Hannible, Caeser, Peter, and Fredric combined.

He wins.

I'm pretty sure that Genghis Khan had more territory, same with Alexander the Great, among others.

Ditto

Plus, has anyone not thought about Julius Caesar?

not really, I usually see him as more of political leader than a military leader, but its not secret hes a brilliant strategic mind.For me I would have to with...*thinks of a great military person that not obvious*... give me minute... *thinks harder* Sun tzu count? he made a frickin book about war -.-