Place Matters: LGB Families in Community Context

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals and their families are often presumed to live in urban “gay Meccas” rather than nonmetropolitan and more rural parts of the USA. However, this urban stereotype is simply not true, particularly for LGB-parented families. LGB parents and their children live in a diversity of community settings, and these communities vary in their levels of support for LGB families. The purpose of this chapter is to document what is known about how the daily lives of LGB families are differentially impacted by where they live. Using minority stress theory, we examine the influences of geographical and demographic diversity as well as community climate, which includes legal, religious, political, workplace, and educational dimensions. Furthermore, we discuss how communities can change to be more LGB affirming.

Bennett, M., & Battle, J. (2001). “We can see them but we can’t hear them”: LGBT members of African American families. In M. Bernstein & R. Reimann (Eds.), Queer families queer politics: Challenging culture and the state (pp. 53–67). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, D. (2008, November). Schools, parks, and playgrounds: Gay fathers negotiate public and private spaces. Paper presented at the National Council on Family Relations in Little Rock, AK.Google Scholar

Klawitter, M. M. and Flatt, V. (1998), The effects of state and local antidiscrimination policies on earnings for gays and lesbians. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 658–686.Google Scholar

Kosciw, J. C., & Diaz, E. M. (2008). Involved, invisible, ignored: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender parents and their children in our nation’s K—12 schools. New York: GLSEN in partnership with COLAGE and the Family Equality Council.Google Scholar

Yakushko, O. (2005). Influence of social support, existential well-being, and stress over sexual orientation on self-esteem of gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 27, 131–143. doi:10.1007/s10447-005-2259-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar