Puna election will go forward Friday

Separated by just 1,635 votes in the Democratic primary for Senate, U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz and U.S. Rep. Colleen Hanabusa went to go to the Big Isle to view the damage from Tropical Storm Iselle and talk with residents.

HILO >> A state Circuit Court judge on Thursday ruled that the state Office of Elections can proceed with a vote Friday for two precincts in Puna that could not open for Saturday's primary in the wake of Tropical Storm Iselle.

U.S. Rep. Colleen Hanabusa, who trails U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz by 1,635 votes in the Democratic primary for Senate, had asked for a temporary restraining order to delay the vote until residents in Puna have had more time to recover from the storm.

Circuit Court Judge Greg Nakamura said that if a popular poll were taken right now, the poll would indicate that "there's some lack of common sense to hold the election tomorrow in light of the natural disaster caused by Iselle and people are trying to recover from the property damage caused by storm conditions, the lack of ability to freely move about, the lack of electrical power, and difficulties in regard to obtaining food and water.

"There are concerns regarding the adequacy of notice of the election and ability to vote tomorrow. Also there would be a concern regarding the legitimacy of the election if it is held tomorrow. If held tomorrow, likely a post-election challenge is invited and likely there will be a perception made -- or there would be a public perception -- that the election was not fair.

"And, frankly, holding the election tomorrow shows some insensitivity to the plight of people in Puna."

But Nakamura said that case law supports the view that "the court is not supposed to interfere with an ongoing election process even if it is unconstitutional. So the court is constrained not to grant the injunctive relief."

State election officials have set the vote at Keonepoko Elementary School for voters in the two precincts that were closed for the primary. Results of the election will be announced on Friday evening.

"We are extremely disappointed for the people of Puna, especially since Judge Nakamura said that holding this election tomorrow lacks 'common sense' and 'shows some insensitivity to the plight of people in Puna.' The judge decided that they did not deserve more time to focus on recovering from the effects of the storm," said Hanabusa spokesman Peter Boylan in a statement.

"We will continue to distribute food, water, fruit and ice to those in need but we need people to be aware that there is an election tomorrow. We are canvassing the precincts and will provide rides to anyone who needs a lift to Keonepoko Elementary School. This campaign is not over and we will continue to work very hard to earn every vote," Boylan said.

The campaign for Schatz also released a statement after the hearing.

"Senator Schatz continues to focus his energies on helping the people of Puna to recover, and that's what he will do on an ongoing basis," his campaign manager Clay Schroers said. "His commitment to recovery in Puna extends beyond the election."

Hanabusa's attorney Richard Wurdeman had argued that Puna residents are focusing on survival from the storm, not voting. Going forward with the election would be "repugnant" to the constitutional rights of Puna voters, and the only way to ensure voting rights is to mail or handout absentee ballots to all eligible voters, he argued.

Wurdeman said afterward that the "fundamental right to vote, that cornerstone of our democracy, that's what's being violated in this case."

He said the Hanabusa campaign would focus on storm relief efforts and the election and not on any further legal challenges.

Deputy Attorney General John Molay, who represented the state's chief election officer, said afterward that the state was pleased by the judge's ruling. "We are happy that the election will go forward tomorrow as we believe would be appropriate," he told reporters.

Molay said the state believes Hanabusa did not have the right to speak on behalf of Puna voters because she is a registered voter on Oahu. "No one appointed her to be their spokesperson," he said.

Molay said "no court has ever stopped a election the day before."

In addition to the Senate primary, state Rep. Faye Hanohano (D, Hawaiian Acres-Pahoa-Kalapana) is behind attorney Joy San Buenaventura in a House primary. Hawaii County Councilman Greggor Ilagan, who represents Puna, is facing three challengers in a council race.

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.

Leave a comment

Name:

Comment:

Please login to leave a comment.

Skylerwrote:

Win or lose, Hanabusa is correct on this matter. Puna residents have more pressing matters on their hands right now. My best wishes to all who are still struggling with day to day basics.

on August 14,2014 | 10:29AM

Name:

Comment:

gicnkwrote:

I am troubled on why Friday? It's not a holiday for everyone. It should be the same day of the week as the primary.

on August 14,2014 | 10:37AM

Name:

Comment:

FarmerDavewrote:

its was brought to my attention from comments by Abercrombie ( from a civil beat story) "Abercrombie addressed this timeline on his visit to the Big Island Wednesday. He said that while state law allows for a 21-day window to hold a vote, state rules also say it should occur within seven days unless there are “compelling circumstances” that need to be taken into account." That may be the justification.

on August 14,2014 | 12:07PM

Name:

Comment:

BO0o07wrote:

7 days would be Friday. Colleen "Rubber Stamp" Hanabusa can appeal to the supreme court if she doesn't like the law.

on August 14,2014 | 12:34PM

Name:

Comment:

localguywrote:

Word is she went home and had a temper tantrum, throwing things around, crying about no one listening to her.

on August 14,2014 | 12:50PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

You so funny. How she spoke about Schatz being ahead of her was weird.

on August 14,2014 | 01:52PM

Name:

Comment:

baileygirl9631wrote:

She made an effort to influence voters by coming on strong to make them think she was the one who was thinking about them only. An old political move to get votes. Most of us saw this but I wonder if the voters will think the same.

on August 14,2014 | 02:48PM

Name:

Comment:

alliewrote:

Trouble is, Hanabusa has never expressed the slightest interest in Puna before. Her racial appeal to certain voters over others goes over very poorly with Puna voters. Her arrogance and dark past do not help either. Puna voters are very akamai.

on August 14,2014 | 03:43PM

Name:

Comment:

justmyview371wrote:

Count again! Seven (7) days is Saturday, not Friday. They choose Friday because it is a State holiday and they thought it might be better than Saturday. I don't know why?
Frankly, the polling place should be open everyday next week so that voters can come in when it's convenient.

on August 14,2014 | 03:57PM

Name:

Comment:

BO0o07wrote:

Within 7 days is Friday counting Saturday the 9th as the first day. It's Saturday if you count the day after the 9th.

Same as the General Election. It's on a Tuesday and not a holiday for everyone but the law allows an employee two hours to vote if the employee can't make it within the voting hours.

on August 14,2014 | 12:11PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

Really.

on August 14,2014 | 01:50PM

Name:

Comment:

Kapahowrote:

I agree. Why not Saturday? Would have a possible bigger voter turnout as this Friday is a state holiday. But I think it's time Hanabusa let the voters decide. I wonder if Schatz was losing, would he have filed a suit? It's easy when you're ahead.

on August 14,2014 | 07:39PM

Name:

Comment:

thanks4readingwrote:

Disagree. Voters could have taken advantage of early voting. The hurricane was known days in advance. Those who really wanted to vote likely did so.

on August 14,2014 | 12:09PM

Name:

Comment:

HawaiiCheeseBallwrote:

Do you think its possible that even though they had advance warning they were perhaps too busy preparing for the storm? I would imagine that making sure your business and/or home were secure, that you had the supplies necessary to ride out the storm and its aftermath would probably and other life safety concerns would take precedence. But don't you think that given that the right to vote is constitutionally guaranteed should in be incumbent on the state in furthing and preserving that right have a responsibility to hold the vote in a time, manner, and place that is conducive to exercising that right? Given that, shouldn't we all be troubled when a judge states that there are concerns about adequate notice being given that could cause some to question the legitimacy of the vote and invite a challenge to the results, not to mention the priceless comment about a "lack of commen sense". If you read between the lines the judge is warning the state - case law says I can't stop this election, but I can surely rule on a motion after the election that the State conducted this election inappropriately.

on August 14,2014 | 01:37PM

Name:

Comment:

Maunakeawrote:

Thanks for your common sense comment!

on August 14,2014 | 02:30PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

Early voting (absentee voting) is when a constituent puts his name down to do just that, if one did not put in for absentee voting then obviousloy, you cannot vote early.

on August 14,2014 | 01:55PM

Name:

Comment:

Skylerwrote:

Early voting can be done via machine at designated locations prior to the election. It's usually closed a day or so before. In this case, their 'early voting' was closed early - more bogus voter disenfranchisement.

on August 15,2014 | 12:06AM

Name:

Comment:

entrknwrote:

That's right. I saw the storm coming and voted days early, and that's what anyone in the path of a storm should do. That is their opportunity to vote and it's very generous and very convenient.

on August 14,2014 | 02:29PM

Name:

Comment:

justmyview371wrote:

Maybe they should poistpone an election durina Hurricane!

on August 14,2014 | 03:58PM

Name:

Comment:

Chennchinawrote:

Why would they schedule an election during a hurricane?

on August 14,2014 | 06:00PM

Name:

Comment:

kapoleitalkstorywrote:

thanks4reading - GREAT point and every resident interviewed in PUNA has said the same thing...

on August 14,2014 | 04:37PM

Name:

Comment:

Skylerwrote:

Every? Buncha bs & you know it.

on August 15,2014 | 12:09AM

Name:

Comment:

8082062424wrote:

i agree .sad but that there way of controlling

on August 14,2014 | 12:15PM

Name:

Comment:

hanalei395wrote:

And no doubt, Puna residents also think Hanabusa is correct. And because of that, and because the residents are now forced to vote on Friday, the voters who were not going to vote for Hanabusa, will now probably vote for her. Just for spite. However, Schatz or Hanabusa, it's a win-win for Hawaiians.

on August 14,2014 | 12:25PM

Name:

Comment:

controlwrote:

some people think that either candidate is a lose-lose situation, all depends on which side of the fence you are on. As for who puna will vote for, you again seem to pick the loser, trying to justify that that person will win. BTW, we haven't seen your spiteful posts on the recent Deedy impasse thread yet.

on August 14,2014 | 12:40PM

Name:

Comment:

whatwrote:

It's also possible that many Puna voters, like Hurricane Iniki and Hurricane Sandy voters, didn't think it was a big deal and simply voted without dramatic "whoa is me" overtones.

on August 14,2014 | 12:42PM

Name:

Comment:

localguywrote:

Not even close. Puna voters wanted Hanabooza to mind her own business, didn't need her meddling in their business. Her actions were the least thing you need when you are trying to restart your life.

Don't always agree with Hanabusa, but she's right this time. How can the people of Puna be expected to think about voting when they are worrying about basic needs like food and water?

on August 14,2014 | 12:55PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

You mean after hanabusa harassed the Puna voters, or made a big stink so that they would remember her name, what is 'right' about what she did?

on August 14,2014 | 01:50PM

Name:

Comment:

Ronin006wrote:

The residents of Puna were warned for several days before the primary that they were the bull's eye for the approaching hurricane/tropical storm and they were encouraged to vote early or by mail. About 17.5% of registered voters heeded the warning and voted early. Most of those who did not vote probably had no intention of doing so. I am sorry for the people struggling to recover from the storm, but not for those who did not heed the warnings to vote early.

on August 14,2014 | 05:00PM

Name:

Comment:

4COMMONSENSEwrote:

totally agreed with you!!!!!!!!!!!!

on August 15,2014 | 01:14AM

Name:

Comment:

DemBoneswrote:

One judge to decide (sway) an election. Doesn't sound right to me.

on August 14,2014 | 10:33AM

Name:

Comment:

GONEGOLFINwrote:

The delayed vote will not alter the end result one way or the other. Too much disparity in voting totals to make a difference anyway. It is unfortunate, but what is even more unfortunate is the way Colleen handled this-it really unveils herself as a self-serving individual only interested in her own personal gains.

on August 14,2014 | 11:18AM

Name:

Comment:

lee1957wrote:

Don't be obtuse, the judge's decision will not sway the election.

on August 14,2014 | 11:23AM

Name:

Comment:

GooglyMooglywrote:

Please read the article before commenting.

on August 14,2014 | 12:48PM

Name:

Comment:

falsewrote:

Hanabusa, is desperate! Now, what happens if we should get hit by another hurricane next week?? Roads are open, people can drive and get supplies today....why can't they drive to vote....no excuse!

on August 14,2014 | 10:41AM

Name:

Comment:

Tita Girlwrote:

Judge Nakamura should delay the vote.This way, no one can "cry foul" later. Similar to when a judge rules, then puts a stay on his own ruling to give the other side an opportunity to prepare an appeal. Don't want another round of counting hanging chads now do we?

on August 14,2014 | 10:50AM

Name:

Comment:

MrMililaniwrote:

Sorry "TitGirl"...get it over with. Why prolong the agony for Hanabusa?

on August 14,2014 | 11:37AM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

Who IS she?

on August 14,2014 | 01:58PM

Name:

Comment:

GooglyMooglywrote:

Did you not read the article? In his decision, the judge is basically saying "having the election tomorrow makes no sense and opens the result up to added scrutiny because of the circumstances, but my hands are tied. The court cannot interfere with the election process even if it is unconstitutional."

on August 14,2014 | 12:52PM

Name:

Comment:

controlwrote:

The judge also said that he has no legal way of stopping the election. Hanabatta can take her case to the supreme court after the election is done. We'll see if that will make a difference, I doubt that the supreme court will change the election.

on August 14,2014 | 01:12PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

There will be an excuse if another storm hits.

on August 14,2014 | 01:57PM

Name:

Comment:

lee1957wrote:

It's obvious Schatz is going to win, just look at the photos. He has way more leis than Colleen.

on August 14,2014 | 11:23AM

Name:

Comment:

SY808wrote:

Dammit.... You made me spit-spray diet coke all over my computer!

on August 14,2014 | 01:25PM

Name:

Comment:

Maunakeawrote:

Now that's a clever way to assess victory!

on August 14,2014 | 02:37PM

Name:

Comment:

samidunnwrote:

To many Puna voters still unable to get to the polls. Postpone it till everyone is able to at least have electricity.

on August 14,2014 | 11:52AM

Name:

Comment:

dslwrote:

three weeks? that's not practical.

on August 14,2014 | 12:10PM

Name:

Comment:

Maunakeawrote:

Up until three weeks!

on August 14,2014 | 02:38PM

Name:

Comment:

PTFwrote:

The people of Kauai didn't have electricity when Iniki hit in 1992 and the elections was eight days after Iniki hit. No telling how long the electricity will be out.

on August 14,2014 | 12:13PM

Name:

Comment:

localguywrote:

Back in the day elections were held without electricity. Not required now. Can count the ballots at a location with power. Nothing wrong with paper ballots.

on August 14,2014 | 12:56PM

Name:

Comment:

Workingrlwrote:

Why do the residents need to have electricity to vote?

on August 14,2014 | 01:06PM

Name:

Comment:

zhirowrote:

Why didn't Hanabusa attend the hearing before Judge Nakamura?

on August 14,2014 | 11:57AM

Name:

Comment:

localguywrote:

Word is the Judge only allowed "Professionals" inside. She does not meet this standard.

on August 14,2014 | 12:56PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

HaHa

on August 14,2014 | 02:00PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

She's a bully.

on August 14,2014 | 01:59PM

Name:

Comment:

cardocwrote:

Finally there is an end to this. 1,800 plus absentee already in, maybe another 2,000 votes come in, Hanabusa will lose by MORE than 2000 votes at the end of the day. All this crying and Shatz will increase his lead. Maybe if all 8,000 votes came in /shatz could win by 4,000 votes!

on August 14,2014 | 12:00PM

Name:

Comment:

controlwrote:

The decision has been made, the vote goes on. Posters here can whine all they want about why the election should be delayed but the court decided already, get over it. Besides Hanabatta can go to the supreme court to contest the election later. But no matter which way (delay or no delay) I still don't think that Coleen would have enough votes to change the results. I also felt that it might have been best if the election were be delayed but since the court decided no sense whining about it already.

on August 14,2014 | 12:01PM

Name:

Comment:

Hawaiiobserverwrote:

If a hurricane does not sway Office of Elections, the judge, the state attorney, etc., from using the maximum amount of 21 days to postpone an election, then what wil?? Why the rush? Unless each of these decision makers have visited Puna and seen the damages themselves, they should not assume that everyone is able to vote. Of course it's "legal" to have the election on Friday, but is it right? Mr. Louie and election officials, please have a heart. Show some aloha.

on August 14,2014 | 12:03PM

Name:

Comment:

GooglyMooglywrote:

I think you mean "36% of everyone", since that's a typical voter turnout. A pathetic legacy this generation of voters (and those eligible to vote) leaves for the next one.

on August 14,2014 | 12:54PM

Name:

Comment:

controlwrote:

maybe it's because the other 64% lost faith in the system or maybe it's because they rest don't think there are candidates worth voting for.

on August 14,2014 | 01:13PM

Name:

Comment:

Skylerwrote:

41% elsewhere in HI; 38% in Puna, IIRC.

on August 15,2014 | 12:13AM

Name:

Comment:

ehrhornpwrote:

I asked the same question after the 2000 election. Why the rush to declare the winner? GW obviously didn't want a recount and so it wasn't done.

on August 14,2014 | 04:45PM

Name:

Comment:

Cmonwrote:

Hanabusa used this tragic event to try to promote herself. The other candidates are out in Puna helping the people and getting their hands dirty while she is filing a court order that she knew she was not going to win. Shame on her!

on August 14,2014 | 12:11PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

Well said. It is shameful how hanabusa is acting.

on August 14,2014 | 02:01PM

Name:

Comment:

falsewrote:

Time to look for another job Hanabusa.

on August 14,2014 | 12:12PM

Name:

Comment:

MichaelGwrote:

Were you a former supporter of Hanabusa?

on August 14,2014 | 01:38PM

Name:

Comment:

honokaiwrote:

The word "repugnant" should be reserved for real trauma caused by others. This generation has completely lost it. This candidate does not understand repugnant.

on August 14,2014 | 12:22PM

Name:

Comment:

Ken_Conklinwrote:

Phooey on both Schatz and Hanabata. Vote for Cam Cavasso, the Republican nominee, in November.

on August 14,2014 | 12:23PM

Name:

Comment:

controlwrote:

*cough* *cough* loser *cough* *cough*

on August 14,2014 | 12:35PM

Name:

Comment:

controlwrote:

Just kidding Ken.

on August 14,2014 | 12:42PM

Name:

Comment:

Bdpapawrote:

You are kidding! Aren't you?

on August 14,2014 | 01:18PM

Name:

Comment:

hanalei395wrote:

Not kidding. Hater-of-Hawaiians Conklin knows that Schatz and Hanabusa, a win-win for Hawaiians. And frustrated Conklin is stuck with a "Cam Cavasso".

on August 14,2014 | 01:53PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

No, he means it!

on August 14,2014 | 02:02PM

Name:

Comment:

steveoctoberwrote:

Hanabata will try to show she is a Puna resident, just like she does as a Waianae resident.

on August 14,2014 | 12:25PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

Ouch, you guessed what she plans to do.

on August 14,2014 | 02:02PM

Name:

Comment:

Honto5wrote:

Just a suggestion. Why can't the State Office of Election representative on the Big Island request assistance to send staff out to the Puna location with local officials and go house to house to registered voters or places set up that's providing emergency services to deliver blank ballots and collect them by the end of the week. This would eleviate the need for residents to travel to polling sites and at the same time give local officials an idea on the condition of all residents in the area.

on August 14,2014 | 12:25PM

Name:

Comment:

honokaiwrote:

The people of this area do not need special treatment. If they want to vote, they will. Getting the government involved in a "get out the vote" campaign sets a very bad precedent. People are tired of the "nanny state mentality". If you respect this country enough to vote, then get your #&# down to the polling place and vote.

on August 14,2014 | 12:39PM

Name:

Comment:

Bdpapawrote:

Thank You!

on August 14,2014 | 01:18PM

Name:

Comment:

HawaiiCheeseBallwrote:

Easy to say when you are not worrying about getting ice for you cooler or water to drink and for all that you might not even know the election is going on because you have to electricity to hear the news on the radio.

on August 14,2014 | 01:40PM

Name:

Comment:

baileygirl9631wrote:

Well said!!!

on August 14,2014 | 02:56PM

Name:

Comment:

GooglyMooglywrote:

First, the people have to want to vote. As it was said further up in the comments, they knew this storm was coming over a week in advance. Those that wanted to be sure to have their votes counted probably took advantage of early voting. With 8000 votes outstanding, I'd be surprised if you get 2500 voters to show up.

Second, why would the Office of Elections care about the condition of the Puna area? Their concern is completing the election, not relief.

on August 14,2014 | 01:03PM

Name:

Comment:

SY808wrote:

There is only 6,800 voters outstanding and I'd be surprised if 1,000 show up...

on August 14,2014 | 01:36PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

Very good suggestion, why have they not thought about this?

on August 14,2014 | 02:03PM

Name:

Comment:

whaolewrote:

OMG. The judge did not decide the election. The judge ruled Hanabusa did not present compelling reasons why the vote should not be taken on Friday. She failed. Now move on.
Don't forget to check the stats. Voter turn out is already low, with or without a hurricane. People need to grapple with that stat if they want to circumvent the ekection process like Hanabusa or Cayetano.

on August 14,2014 | 12:35PM

Name:

Comment:

copperwire9wrote:

The judge ruled no such thing. PLEASE read articles before commenting on them.

on August 14,2014 | 01:06PM

Name:

Comment:

honolulugalwrote:

To be fair to whaole, SA changed the article almost completely when they updated it a short time ago. It was quite a surprising change. But as far as how the Judiciary is allowed to interfere in elections, that's I posted previously. It would result in chaos. I was surprised that the judge actually allowed the hearing.

on August 14,2014 | 01:37PM

Name:

Comment:

honolulugalwrote:

Sorry, that should have been: "as far as how the Judiciary is not allowed to interfere...".

on August 14,2014 | 01:53PM

Name:

Comment:

PatriciaBrowntorreswrote:

Whatever the outcome of the election, I hope the people of Puna God speed in their recovery. My prayers are with you all.

on August 14,2014 | 12:39PM

Name:

Comment:

hikinewrote:

First of all as the article stated she doesn't speak for all Puna residents and secondly she doesn't live in the district! She's just making an empathy law suit and hope she can get her entitlement. She's in court while Schatz is in the field actually doing physical assisting to those in need. Hanabusa didn't say anything or delayed the last election's results when polls ran out of ballots and closed! Where's those people's right to vote? Those who can vote can and those who can't, can't, simple as that.

on August 14,2014 | 12:43PM

Name:

Comment:

localguywrote:

Way to go Judge Greg Nakamura, slapping down Hanabooza's shibai lawsuit for the time wasting act it was. Now the voters know Hanabooza's true concerns are to take care of #1. All that supposed concern for the voters of Puna was just part of an act. Now having seen the real Hanabooza the voters will make the right decision and send her home. Justice has been served.

on August 14,2014 | 12:47PM

Name:

Comment:

controlwrote:

But then didn't we know all along what a crybaby Hanabusa is?

on August 14,2014 | 01:09PM

Name:

Comment:

Denominatorwrote:

"likely a post election challenge" . This could result in a new election?

on August 14,2014 | 12:50PM

Name:

Comment:

SY808wrote:

Likely she will drag this out in court... Unlikely to get a do-over!

on August 14,2014 | 01:38PM

Name:

Comment:

mikaele1wrote:

like to see who going stick around next week and keep up the chili and ice capades show.

on August 14,2014 | 12:58PM

Name:

Comment:

Bdpapawrote:

They will be back in Honolulu as soon as the polls close.

on August 14,2014 | 01:20PM

Name:

Comment:

Sunnywrote:

Why doesn't the Governor step in and do what's right?

on August 14,2014 | 01:14PM

Name:

Comment:

Wazdatwrote:

hanabatta is a SORE loser and its sounds like the judge likes her.,

bye bye the witch is dead..

on August 14,2014 | 01:20PM

Name:

Comment:

lgibbswrote:

All this name calling and teasing sickens me....grow up people.

on August 14,2014 | 01:27PM

Name:

Comment:

krushawrote:

At least we'll finally get this settled and move on. Situations like this makes your true colors show, and we have seen by her actions that Hanabusa is definitely somebody we DO NOT want representing the Aloha State.

on August 14,2014 | 01:36PM

Name:

Comment:

MichaelGwrote:

The news reporter on Hawaii News Now (this morning) showed how much of the humanitarian help given by the Hanabusa Camp turned into campaigning for her. It showed her true colors. I hope she plans to remain a few days after the result is in to show her sincerity to help the people.
I was reminded what a sue happy person she was, suing Cayetano when he vetoed the tax credit for Jeff Stone.

on August 14,2014 | 01:37PM

Name:

Comment:

kawika49wrote:

Now would be the time, for the Governor to declare an emergency; and ask the Federal Government for assistance to:
1. fight the Aljazebr(sic) infestation
2. Improve the the infrastructure (roads, power lines).
3. Assistance with planning and evacuation routes.
4. Assist with water availability in the area.

on August 14,2014 | 01:58PM

Name:

Comment:

Kealiiwrote:

Even if Hanabusa is correct and even if the election were held on a later date, she's already lost the election. If there are 8255 Puna registered voters left to vote and she supposedly needs at least 65% of them to vote for her (which has not happened anywhere else) that would equate to 5366 votes she needs. Now if the typical 44% of registered voters actually turn out to vote and they ALL voted 100% for Hanabusa (yeah right) that's only 3632 votes, still far short of the 5366 that she needs. She doesn't have a prayer. Concede already.

on August 14,2014 | 01:39PM

Name:

Comment:

whatwrote:

The power of entitlement mentality is strong. She acts as if the crown was passed to her by Inouye.

on August 14,2014 | 01:55PM

Name:

Comment:

BO0o07wrote:

Two words I haven't heard in a long time, "Brown Nose". Base on her own statements, she was always complementing Inouye.

on August 14,2014 | 02:16PM

Name:

Comment:

username_requiredwrote:

Howzit, Kealii! Schatz is up by 1635 votes. If Hanabusa adds 3632 votes, and he adds zero, she wins by almost 2000 votes.

on August 14,2014 | 02:18PM

Name:

Comment:

Kealiiwrote:

If there was a chance in hell that could happen then I'd say go for it. But you know there isn't.

on August 14,2014 | 03:37PM

Name:

Comment:

AFishOutofH20wrote:

Hannah Busa, you don't have a chance anyway!!!!!!!!

on August 14,2014 | 01:44PM

Name:

Comment:

SY808wrote:

People in Puna should have an easier time getting to the polls tomorrow, than the rest of the island had getting to the polls last Saturday!

on August 14,2014 | 01:45PM

Name:

Comment:

ponoponowrote:

What was hanabusa thinking, pretending that she has the right to speak on behalf of the Puna voters?

on August 14,2014 | 01:48PM

Name:

Comment:

username_requiredwrote:

I agree, but not like Puna folks are going to court to delay the vote. If anything, Hanohano and Ilagan had more solid standing in court, being residents of the district.

on August 14,2014 | 02:22PM

Name:

Comment:

edvisleewrote:

Colleen Hana Babooza! Please go far, far , away so that we can forget about you, your crooked husband, and your thieving ways. Thanks for always talking about "helping" the people while you helped yourself more. You are a true Democrat politician. Hawaii needs more attorneys with political (thieving and lying) aspirations like you. Aloha Babooza

on August 14,2014 | 01:50PM

Name:

Comment:

surfingcopwrote:

1. the elections office should not have released the results until all votes were in.
2. Hanabusa is a sore loser. One cannot run on "Inouye" wanted me and expect to will.

on August 14,2014 | 01:50PM

Name:

Comment:

wallawrote:

C'mon now, if this was not an election year, you think for one bit Schatz and/or Hanabusa will be there 'helping'? Of course not.

on August 14,2014 | 02:00PM

Name:

Comment:

bugadojwrote:

I think she scared she might loose to schatz cry baby if you good person the people go vote for you WHY WORRY STUPID

on August 14,2014 | 02:04PM

Name:

Comment:

Reade1wrote:

In todays society it is so difficult to trust anyone in all levels of Federal, State Government and their Agencies/Lawyers. It seems society is losing the understanding the meaning between right and wrong. If the concerns are wrong obtain an attorney to make it right or amend the law to make it to their advantage vise versa. Our society is losing everyday the basic virtue of living "trust". I hope the time will never come to be in the same shoes of the people of Puna and if does happen I hope as a tax payer I would have the privilege to make a decision within the 21 day period that the law states.

"Wurdeman said afterward that the "fundamental right to vote, that cornerstone of our democracy, that's what's being violated in this case.". He said the Hanabusa campaign would focus on storm relief efforts and the election and not on any further legal challenges.". Now that she lost the hearing, I guess Hanabusa isn't as concerned about the "fundamental right to vote, that cornerstone of our democracy"???????

on August 14,2014 | 02:16PM

Name:

Comment:

justmyview371wrote:

He meant focus on lobbying the voters until the last minute.

on August 14,2014 | 04:14PM

Name:

Comment:

justmyview371wrote:

OK, who believes Hanabusa will not mount additional challenges?

on August 14,2014 | 10:26PM

Name:

Comment:

kwenselwrote:

After Friday Hanabusa needs to pack up her stuff out of Washington. At least she can still pump gas in Waianae. Keep her away from tires because she has too much hot air for now.

on August 14,2014 | 02:17PM

Name:

Comment:

gmedleywrote:

She gave up a US Representative seat to run for US Senator. I'm surprised she could not dominate the japanese vote the way Ige did over Abercrombie.
A mental guy in Pearl City (he's japanese) told me it was because local japanese don't like Hanabata, Hanacuso or Hanabusa. HE said it- not me.

on August 14,2014 | 03:35PM

Name:

Comment:

kapoleitalkstorywrote:

No Hanabusa wants to wait until everything is back like it was before the hurricane hit. Never mind that there is a NEW hurricane on its way westward bound.

on August 14,2014 | 02:36PM

Name:

Comment:

Bullywrote:

Schatz hit the ground running in Puna chipping in the help with the grunt work. I think the people will appreciate that and vote for him.

on August 14,2014 | 02:40PM

Name:

Comment:

Poipounder808wrote:

So what is the deal with her husband? I have heard many "stories" about his shady deals. You never see him in public with her or in her ads. She doesn't even want to use his name apparently....

on August 14,2014 | 02:40PM

Name:

Comment:

MichaelGwrote:

She doesn't need her husband to tarnish her name. She lied in the debates about voting for the Bowles-Simpson amendment that would have raised the retirement age. We can't have a US Senator who blatantly lies and thinks nothing of it.

on August 14,2014 | 03:18PM

Name:

Comment:

rayhawaiiwrote:

Start the vote. People there will vote or not. Most don't vote anyway. I bet 42 people show up even if there wasn't a hurricane.

on August 14,2014 | 03:15PM

Name:

Comment:

WEATHERwrote:

If they can't get to the polls, that's clearly an issue. That's not what was reported on the news this morning. Roads have been cleared. I can't personally vouch for that statement, but nobody's refuted it. Without power, without water, got it. Hardship. Kind of like during the elections in the early 1800s. Couldn't vote mail in because they were spending their time prepping for storm. Really? If it takes more than 5 minutes to consummate your civic responsibility as a voter (complete the ballot), one has to wonder if you have any clue as to who's running, what the issues are, and why you haven't made a decison. Actually, if one is irresponsible and uninformed, I'd prefer they didn't vote.

on August 14,2014 | 03:20PM

Name:

Comment:

fiveowrote:

In my view, these guys in Puna were largely fanning this voting thing out of
proportion, because they figured this would get them attention and free stuff's.
Pretty much a scam. Most probably would not have voted if the storm had not
hit.
These are the guys who cried the loudest about being too concerned about
their personal circumstances to vote.

on August 14,2014 | 03:33PM

Name:

Comment:

seabornwrote:

Hanabusa is lame. Put voting booths next to where the people are getting the free food and water, and problem solved. Simple. No lawsuit at taxpayers' expernse.

on August 14,2014 | 03:38PM

Name:

Comment:

justmyview371wrote:

They need to upgrade to prime steak and the fixings!

on August 14,2014 | 04:06PM

Name:

Comment:

pbckwrote:

Well should the voters turn up and vote Schatz I think it is our duty as americans to come to the assistance of those who are in need. I say we should have a collection bin set up at the capital where good samaritans can come by and drop off job applications. It's certainly gonna be difficult getting around town when you can't call da choppa.

on August 14,2014 | 04:05PM

Name:

Comment:

edvisleewrote:

LOL that was precious!

on August 14,2014 | 04:48PM

Name:

Comment:

justmyview371wrote:

You mean "win" but I get it. I agree if they had to close polling places anywhere they need to delay release of the count unless the number of votes remaining couldn't make a difference. But the Elections Office always messes things up.

on August 14,2014 | 04:12PM

Name:

Comment:

Ronin006wrote:

This campaign is not over and we will continue to work very hard to earn every vote," Boylan said. Considering that the Hanabusa campaign handed out a lot of freebies, Boylan should have said they will continue to work hard to BUY every vote.

on August 14,2014 | 04:51PM

Name:

Comment:

Skylerwrote:

Schatz is doing the exact same thing - don't be fooled.

on August 15,2014 | 12:22AM

Name:

Comment:

kainaluwrote:

Whether Hanabusa wins or loses, the point has been made. Inouye doesn't get to select his successor, the people do.

on August 14,2014 | 04:56PM

Name:

Comment:

Maneki_Nekowrote:

Pitbull vs Chihuahua. The showdown.

on August 14,2014 | 05:41PM

Name:

Comment:

papio5wrote:

Let's see, lower voter turnout benefits who? Elections official first said mail in voting but then changed to friday. Hmm, do you think that the political machine had any influence on that decision?

on August 14,2014 | 05:59PM

Name:

Comment:

Skylerwrote:

I've seen that mentioned lately - no way to really prove it, though. Basically all circumstantial evidence only. I even heard that the AG that made the decision was @ Schatz' campaign on Saturday night, but again - no proof. I doubt anyone would pursue the real truth of all the decisions made.

on August 15,2014 | 12:25AM

Name:

Comment:

Kapahowrote:

In the words of Yogi Berra, "it ain't over until it's over". Never can tell but Schatz has the clear advantage. Two younger statesman in Congress (Schatz and Gabbard) would be good for Hawaii as they can build up seniority like Inouye and Akaka did. Got to look at the bigger picture.

on August 14,2014 | 07:43PM

Name:

Comment:

Numilalocalwrote:

The election after Iniki on Kauai in '92 wasn't rescheduled - the precedent's already been set.

on August 14,2014 | 08:07PM

Name:

Comment:

lesparkwrote:

It looks like a toss up so what is the fuss all about one way or another.

on August 14,2014 | 08:22PM

Name:

Comment:

dtpro1wrote:

We give Rep. Hanabusa an A for effort. The realty is the impromtu decision change by the election office (from 21 to 7 days) will not affort recovery time for many storm vicutms and the communication of this election date change is marginal at best. Yet another example (one of many) of subpar leadership from the executive branch. Lest all forget the last election was bungled by this same office and there was no accountablility at the top. The people of Hawaii "deserve better."

on August 14,2014 | 08:48PM

Name:

Comment:

mikaele1wrote:

hope there is another opportunity for Colleen to serve Hawaii. it is poho she is not still in the house.