Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider
registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Possible breach of rule 8 removed. As you have not explained who the owner of this facebook account is, nor if they have given permission for this link to be shared on an open forum, I have removed the link.

No, this whole thing is just some kind of weird fetish for you. None of this god bride, world mother stuff is real; it's just your kink (also called a fetish). You are wrong to expect anyone not into your kink to participate. Scrape some money together and fly to Berlin, Germany where people with your particular interests are welcomed.

Actually that is what Christianity is about. Family. The Father child relationship was witnessed about much. In future it will be supported by the Husband wife relationship and the consequences for humanity.

Well that's rich. First you admit that there was a problem with the security settings on the image by admitting those settings needed to be changed:

Then go on to accuse one of the people who called you out on the problem of '"sloppiness" when it was in fact YOUR ignorance and inability to understand remedial Facebook permission concepts that caused the problem.

I've seen gas lighting on this forum before, but to see someone try to gaslight about something that they admitted earlier in the same posts is rare indeed.

kali1137 was not the sloppy one, you were. Try owing up to your mistakes for once.

Did kali not know how to access that page on Facebook by the normal way sending a "friend request"?

Actually that is what Christianity is about. Family. The Father child relationship was witnessed about much. In future it will be supported by the Husband wife relationship and the consequences for humanity.

I donít know enough about the ways in which you abuse children to say more. I donít know enough about the mind of an abuser to speculate. The fact you are a abusive is no longer really debatable at this stage. If the documentaries Iíve seen over the years are any indication, some abusers actually get off on reminiscing about the abuse, so Iím certainly not going to give you spank bank material by trying to guess what kind of abuser you are.

Originally Posted by Johanabrahams

Yep. You were trying to say that God is into creating bad lives for people by stealing and killing their stock.

And I said that in Job is the evidence that God always give more when something was taken for a special purpose. He is not a thief. He always focuses on what is better for us.

I see you never read the sections about the Conquest of Canaan. Or the rebuilding of the Temple after the Babylonian exile. Or really learned much about the lives of the Apostles.

Claiming that the pigs and the fig tree were replaced with your only ďevidenceĒ being extrapolation from Job requires rank and deliberate ignorance of large swaths of the Bible. Youíre extrapolating from an extraordinary situation to the general. Your theology appears to be the kind of soft-shoe nonsense of people who chose to whitewash the difficult questions of the Bible rather than confront them.

Iím OK with that kind of laziness when itís in the hands of genuinely nice people for whom religion is largely an excuse for running soup kitchens and job programs for the homeless, but it becomes a dangerous manipulation tool in the hands of a dime store Jim Jones such as yourself.

Then of course thereís the rank sexism of your using Job as a model. Jobís wife and children certainly arenít compensated for their brutal murders, are they? God murders them to test Job, but youíre OK with that because they get replaced. Then there are all the other people in his household who were murdered as part of his test. Youíre OK with people being murdered so long as the person you see as ďowningĒ those people gets compensation. Thatís sick.

I know youíre trying to be insulting by referring to the people wiping the floor with you as ďchildrenĒ but it really just ends up coming across as lazy on your part. Itís an admission that you have no substantive response.

Every time you call me a child, I see not the insult you intend, but a concession. Youíre admitting Iíve rhetorically spit-roasted you and the best you have is a lame retort of desperation, like a bully tacking a nonsensical, ďWell, your momís a whore!Ē To the end of the moment where heís defeated.

The problem you seem unable to confront is that we arenít taken in by your veneer of paternalism. We see it for what it is, the small, petty, desperate ploy of a man who is out of ideas.

Originally Posted by Johanabrahams

Did you investigate?

Yes.

Your most recent lies have been about the Facebook incident. Thereís no investigation needed to know youíre lying about that. I was part of the conversation when it happened.

I know youíre trying to be insulting by referring to the people wiping the floor with you as ďchildrenĒ but it really just ends up coming across as lazy on your part. Itís an admission that you have no substantive response.

Every time you call me a child, I see not the insult you intend, but a concession. Youíre admitting Iíve rhetorically spit-roasted you and the best you have is a lame retort of desperation, like a bully tacking a nonsensical, ďWell, your momís a whore!Ē To the end of the moment where heís defeated.

The problem you seem unable to confront is that we arenít taken in by your veneer of paternalism. We see it for what it is, the small, petty, desperate ploy of a man who is out of ideas.

Yes.

Your most recent lies have been about the Facebook incident. Thereís no investigation needed to know youíre lying about that. I was part of the conversation when it happened.

Youíre a liar. I know youíre a liar.

Amen mother halley

__________________I am 100% confident all psychics and mediums are frauds.
----------------------------------------------Proud woo denier
----------------------------------------------
ďThat which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.Ē -Christopher Hitchens-

It gets better. Heís trying to contact me through Facebook messenger. He must be REALLY confused about this dynamic if he thinks itís a GOOD idea to try and initiate a conversation with me in a venue not bound by this forumís rules. Yes, Facebook has its own rules and I know the odds are good someone he knows will be able to take screen shots and post them online, but Iím still left with the ability to tell him what I really think instead of just what the forumís rules will let me say.

His initial message was rather predictable. I'm not sure I can post much if any of his actual comments until his suspension ends due to forum rules against acting as a proxy for a banned or suspended user. That said, I replied to him and I ended my reply with:

Quote:

Now, a warning. If you wish to continue talking to me on Facebook messenger, I will be posting portions of our conversation to the ISF thread. Continuing to contact me constitutes consent to me redistributing our conversation, in whole or in part, in any media or venue I deem appropriate.

While this may scare him off of responding, being able to actually use the text as I see fit is worth the risk.

It gets better. Heís trying to contact me through Facebook messenger. He must be REALLY confused about this dynamic if he thinks itís a GOOD idea to try and initiate a conversation with me in a venue not bound by this forumís rules. Yes, Facebook has its own rules and I know the odds are good someone he knows will be able to take screen shots and post them online, but Iím still left with the ability to tell him what I really think instead of just what the forumís rules will let me say.

To quote Bugs Bunny, ďHe donít know me very well, do he?Ē

In the end, Johan's master plan was to get more friends on facebook to help him grow his Farmville crops.

__________________I am 100% confident all psychics and mediums are frauds.
----------------------------------------------Proud woo denier
----------------------------------------------
ďThat which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.Ē -Christopher Hitchens-

After the security settings on the Zola Facebook post were opened up, he posted some information from Facebook that he considered to be data about actual forum members. He also launched into efforts to get another poster to give him their real name. It was all super creepy. There was also an image that was posted but the link was deleted by the moderators before I saw the image.

Basically, there were at least half a dozen posts I saw that could easily meet the criteria of a Rule 8 violation. I suspect the sheer number of them in such a short time frame, combined with obvious data gathering for future stalking, all combined to make the suspension necessary.

It gets better. Heís trying to contact me through Facebook messenger. He must be REALLY confused about this dynamic if he thinks itís a GOOD idea to try and initiate a conversation with me in a venue not bound by this forumís rules. Yes, Facebook has its own rules and I know the odds are good someone he knows will be able to take screen shots and post them online, but Iím still left with the ability to tell him what I really think instead of just what the forumís rules will let me say.

People seem quote confused by his "call me mother" routine. He's also trying to direct people to his wife's Facebook profile.

He also clearly does NOT get how "liking" a thing on Facebook works. In one post he comments on the lack of dislikes, as if that were a thing on Facebook. He really does seem to think someone clicking "like" on a post means they agree 100% with its content.

People seem quote confused by his "call me mother" routine. He's also trying to direct people to his wife's Facebook profile.

He also clearly does NOT get how "liking" a thing on Facebook works. In one post he comments on the lack of dislikes, as if that were a thing on Facebook. He really does seem to think someone clicking "like" on a post means they agree 100% with its content.

My prediction is that after his fortnight suspension - coupled with his thought process that his kids tattled on him, that he will not return to the thread. He will most likely find another forum to spout his god thoughts and add us to the list of places he got banned for being god.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.