On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 15:25 +0800, xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The idea is simple, just to pin the guest VM user space and then
> let host NIC driver has the chance to directly DMA to it.
> The patches are based on vhost-net backend driver. We add a device
> which provides proto_ops as sendmsg/recvmsg to vhost-net to
> send/recv directly to/from the NIC driver. KVM guest who use the
> vhost-net backend may bind any ethX interface in the host side to
> get copyless data transfer thru guest virtio-net frontend.

What is the advantage of this approach compared to PCI-passthrough
of the host NIC to the guest?
Does this require pinning of the entire guest memory? Or only the
send/receive buffers?

Thanks
Sridhar
>
> The scenario is like this:
>
> The guest virtio-net driver submits multiple requests thru vhost-net
> backend driver to the kernel. And the requests are queued and then
> completed after corresponding actions in h/w are done.
>
> For read, user space buffers are dispensed to NIC driver for rx when
> a page constructor API is invoked. Means NICs can allocate user buffers
> from a page constructor. We add a hook in netif_receive_skb() function
> to intercept the incoming packets, and notify the zero-copy device.
>
> For write, the zero-copy deivce may allocates a new host skb and puts
> payload on the skb_shinfo(skb)->frags, and copied the header to skb->data.
> The request remains pending until the skb is transmitted by h/w.
>
> Here, we have ever considered 2 ways to utilize the page constructor
> API to dispense the user buffers.
>
> One: Modify __alloc_skb() function a bit, it can only allocate a
> structure of sk_buff, and the data pointer is pointing to a
> user buffer which is coming from a page constructor API.
> Then the shinfo of the skb is also from guest.
> When packet is received from hardware, the skb->data is filled
> directly by h/w. What we have done is in this way.
>
> Pros: We can avoid any copy here.
> Cons: Guest virtio-net driver needs to allocate skb as almost
> the same method with the host NIC drivers, say the size
> of netdev_alloc_skb() and the same reserved space in the
> head of skb. Many NIC drivers are the same with guest and
> ok for this. But some lastest NIC drivers reserves special
> room in skb head. To deal with it, we suggest to provide
> a method in guest virtio-net driver to ask for parameter
> we interest from the NIC driver when we know which device
> we have bind to do zero-copy. Then we ask guest to do so.
> Is that reasonable?
>
> Two: Modify driver to get user buffer allocated from a page constructor
> API(to substitute alloc_page()), the user buffer are used as payload
> buffers and filled by h/w directly when packet is received. Driver
> should associate the pages with skb (skb_shinfo(skb)->frags). For
> the head buffer side, let host allocates skb, and h/w fills it.
> After that, the data filled in host skb header will be copied into
> guest header buffer which is submitted together with the payload buffer.
>
> Pros: We could less care the way how guest or host allocates their
> buffers.
> Cons: We still need a bit copy here for the skb header.
>
> We are not sure which way is the better here. This is the first thing we want
> to get comments from the community. We wish the modification to the network
> part will be generic which not used by vhost-net backend only, but a user
> application may use it as well when the zero-copy device may provides async
> read/write operations later.
>
> Please give comments especially for the network part modifications.
>
>
> We provide multiple submits and asynchronous notifiicaton to
> vhost-net too.
>
> Our goal is to improve the bandwidth and reduce the CPU usage.
> Exact performance data will be provided later. But for simple
> test with netperf, we found bindwidth up and CPU % up too,
> but the bindwidth up ratio is much more than CPU % up ratio.
>
> What we have not done yet:
> packet split support
> To support GRO
> Performance tuning
>
> what we have done in v1:
> polish the RCU usage
> deal with write logging in asynchroush mode in vhost
> add notifier block for mp device
> rename page_ctor to mp_port in netdevice.h to make it looks generic
> add mp_dev_change_flags() for mp device to change NIC state
> add CONIFG_VHOST_MPASSTHRU to limit the usage when module is not load
> a small fix for missing dev_put when fail
> using dynamic minor instead of static minor number
> a __KERNEL__ protect to mp_get_sock()
>
> what we have done in v2:
>
> remove most of the RCU usage, since the ctor pointer is only
> changed by BIND/UNBIND ioctl, and during that time, NIC will be
> stopped to get good cleanup(all outstanding requests are finished),
> so the ctor pointer cannot be raced into wrong situation.
>
> Remove the struct vhost_notifier with struct kiocb.
> Let vhost-net backend to alloc/free the kiocb and transfer them
> via sendmsg/recvmsg.
>
> use get_user_pages_fast() and set_page_dirty_lock() when read.
>
> Add some comments for netdev_mp_port_prep() and handle_mpassthru().
>
>
> Comments not addressed yet in this time:
> the async write logging is not satified by vhost-net
> Qemu needs a sync write
> a limit for locked pages from get_user_pages_fast()
>
>
> performance:
> using netperf with GSO/TSO disabled, 10G NIC,
> disabled packet split mode, with raw socket case compared to vhost.
>
> bindwidth will be from 1.1Gbps to 1.7Gbps
> CPU % from 120%-140% to 140%-160%
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html