Cultural Eugenics: A Theory

The top and bottom against the middle. White status whoring with minority pawns. SWPL hypocrisy. Anti-white anti-racists. Two Americas. Jesusland.

You’ve heard all these before. The Orwellian prognosis of a political culture steeped in a mountain of lies and suppressed crimethink. Astute observers of the American scene can’t help but notice that something foul is afoot, and they’ve given it a contour: the white ruling class has it in for the white working class.

The WRC is working diligently to make life as difficult as possible for the WWC. The white elite are successfully putting their hate for “those other whites” into policy form, the result being open borders, quotas, AA, outsourcing, emasculating indoctrination, Section 8, credentialism, etc. These policies hurt the WWC much more than the blowback hurts the WRC because the latter has the money and foresight to live in carved-out enclaves full of upper class and upper middle class whites like themselves. But they speak out of both sides of their mouths, for they do not want the WWC to know that the elite don’t really practice what they preach.

I have a theory that I believe has even more explanatory power than irrational ruling class hatred for working class co-ethnics. I call it “cultural eugenics”, and it basically states that, within the ruling minority — in this case, the WRC — there percolates a subconscious mental algorithm, shaped by ancient genetic imperative, which compels the WRC (the alpha males of the national pack) to “filter” or “select” whites lower on the status hierarchy for the ability to navigate the WRC’s cruelly labyrinthine cultural obstacles. It is similar in function to how a small hunter-gatherer tribe has rites of passage for its adolescent males, and how the tribe will viciously ridicule members who fail at a task or embarrass themselves in some manner. The purpose is not to kill them off, but to make them stronger. More like the alphas of the tribe.

The WRC doesn’t intend to do this culling specifically; it is an organic phenomena that arises out of a social milieu in which clearly delineated status hierarchies are becoming even more starkly delineated. The book “Albion’s Seed” goes into detail how these status hierarchies were always a part of America going back to her colonization, because they reflect pathways laid down hundreds of years ago by different tribes of Englishmen.

So in a way you could argue that, perhaps subconsciously, perhaps with awareness, the WRC has had, until now, the WWC’s best interests in heart — to make them better whites. The problem has become that racial diversity — one of the “betterment sufferings” the WRC has deployed to ostensibly strengthen the moral character of the WWC — has severed the comity and the trust and the simple visibility between the white classes, and made the task of scaling the WRC’s obstacles that much harder for the WWC to accomplish. A grave malaise, even an emotional regression, has settled in on the minds of the lower status whites, and instead of fight for their place at the white table and look with pride upon their co-ethnics who have succeeded (pride, because there was historically an implied understanding that the WRC life could be theirs with devotion to self-improvement), they have reverted to aping the crass lifestyle of those indigents who surround them and who are their most visible alpha males of the pack.

In sum, the white ruling class lost its sense of shared destiny and obligation, and the white working class lost its kindred alpha male to emulate. The cultural eugenic program has morphed from one to lift the weakest tribe members and humble the strongest tribe members, to one in which the strong tribe members have decided to kill off or banish to the wastelands the weaker tribe members.

Like this:

Related

249 Responses

The WASP elite always had a sense of noblesse olblige. What’s left of them doesn’t have it anymore (Bush, for example). Who has supplanted them, hmm? And how did they turn the remnant of WASPS into bad people?

It’s worthy to note that the Enclosure Acts, in which the British ruling classes suddenly walled off the formerly public fields from the peasantry, was actually followed by an explosion of national power in the next century. But they may be unrelated.

The Patrician, Equestrian, and Plebeian orders were indispensable to the longevity of the Roman Republic, which lasted half a millennium. (And thereafter laid the foundation for another half-millennium empire that dominated the Western world.)

Throughout that thousand-year dominance the noblesse oblige of the patronage system was the backbone of stability until the reforms of Diocletian created the ultimate noblesse relationship of feudalism, which carried on for a millennium after.

The Romans proved that the integrity of large-form republics is hard to maintain after conquering and growing has ceased, tempting a self-ruled polity to tyranny in the absence of common cause. The Americans proved that a large-form republic is indeed possible under a system of checked and balanced powers and a robust sense of noblesse that becomes accessible to every ambitious (and Christian) citizen. The resentments stoked by the Gracchae brothers or the Roosevelt cousins made a chaos of that order, and only then did “noblesse” become a dirty word, seemingly contradictory to the very idea of res publica.

Nobility is anathema to the equalizing fetishists, not to the rule of men over themselves. The Jacobins and the Marxists made a policy of annihilating the aristocrats, not the Americans. We didn’t murder them so much as we made the idea of ostentatious old money seem gauche.

The degradation of Christianity is a huge problem (again I will speak of Bush and his degraded Protestantism, with Jesus being his “favorite philosopher”). The leftists and atheists who think that removing Christianity is a good thing are complete fools, and have no idea how much chaos, disorder and misery it is creating (I am reminded of a saying: “The stupid are always really surprised when you kill them”).

Of course we’re heading towards some sort of a collapse, and from it I expect to see a resurgence of Christianity (I hope a good one) and the collapse of feminism. Most women’s jobs are make-work (government, management, teaching) and once the government and economy go their “jobs” will go away.

Rich people in America have always been different than rich in other places. More respected,more well-liked,more…free. Latin America,for example,has wealthy who live protected by their money from the kidnapping and robbery of the swarthy lessers.Is that really a preferable way to live? here the rich do not fear kidnapping,violence or envy. They used to happily mix with the proles at sporting events and celebrations.To turn much of the nation into a 3rd world shit hole and spend enormous amounts to escape their very creation seems like a crazy deal. What is happening is much more genocidal in nature. If the most racially conscious wealthiest most powerful elites in the nation,( I speak of the Scotch-Irish,of course) wanted to assure that they would rule over this kingdom of shit forever,it seems something like this is what would be perpetrated. And since the Scotch-Irish,despite a superior IQ,supposedly,are known to create chaos and shit wherever they turn their hand,it would seem to be a white vs Scotch-Irish war.(or holocaust if you will)

@ anon
“Scotch-Irish” doesn’t mean people from Scotland and Ireland. In this context, “Scotch-Irish” is code word for Jewish.

Google Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American Porn Industry. It’s an article in The Jewish Quarterly. Here are a few quotes. “Jewish involvement in porn is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority. They are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.” “Pornography becomes a way of defiling Christian culture.”

“Google Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American Porn Industry. It’s an article in The Jewish Quarterly. Here are a few quotes. “Jewish involvement in porn is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority. They are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.” “Pornography becomes a way of defiling Christian culture.”

As we become more like Brazil, kidnapping will be more common. I hope the elite classes like the banana republic they are working so hard to replace the superpower with. The elite can get away with more Eyes Wide Shut type deprivations in a banana republic (unless the public rises up) but they will be leading Republica del Norte and not the once powerful and respected America.

The worst experiments are the social variety. Mainly because people are in dire need of many good control groups in order to more definitively isolate variables; and produce the results one would hope to expect.

The thing is the grand experiment of welfare as a social science project of false compassion has not worked. The working class whites are waking up, and deciding not to play the game. They won’t get the benefits; so why contribute so much blood, sweat, and tears?

I guess with responsibility comes power; whites, men in particualr are loathe to get any. Mainly because they can’t keep it without some sort of PC agenda aimed at ousting them after the hard work is done.

The thing is; the replacements have an extreme entitlement complex. I can only hope that the wwc maintains good credit; and this gets coupled with a financial disaster the wrc cannot afford.

Something has to give. White males are dying more in wars, and at the work place; and being let go after all the hard work is done. Mainly because they have no hope of a law suit as they are not the right sex or color to make such a claim.

Sadly, as more and more PC group think becomes prominent; whites will be forced into relegating their own collective concept of idenity. Thereby considering themselves not just American; but like Black-Americans they will call themselves White-American. This will make many White Nationalists happy I am sure; but honestly I can see it happen. With disastrous results for those who rely on white labor not asking any questions.

Whether it is a good thinkg time will tell. However, if the situation in Detroit is any indication; those in government who know will most likely try to entice more and more white males into the fold; allowing them to go off and find their own identity could be disastrous when you need them. They may collectivley as a whole dismiss all service to country at their expense considering how they are treated by today’s standards.

For example; we are not taught about white slaves in public school. It does not fit into the class warfare paradigm of “us (minorities) VS them (whites) that politicians are still using when talking fo the wealthiest one percent.

Newsflash; many of the wealthiest are not white! Good luck saying that at the unemployment line though!

Remember that America has been moving left ever since women’s suffrage. Society is now driven by female imperative.

The female hamster has no room for nobility or generosity for her fellow “man”. The female hamster has only a winner take all instinct, like the lioness who is biologically driven to, and can only, mate with the lion who kills her cubs.

The female hamster is blind to all things, including race, and sees only the strong. All else deserves to be driven from the face of the earth in the cruelest possible way.

in short, the american dream is dead. The percentages for bounding the obstacles to class are now so small as to endear lower classes to either reality show karaoke fame or a lottery ticket. There isn’t any more work your way to the top.

I think you just described “Cultural Corporatism.” Much like the leaders of industry welcome more regulations to stifle competition, the cultural WRC increases the diversity program to make it harder for others to make it to the big kids’ table.

An interesting theory that may complement my own theories on this subject. Some points.

– Have you seen my points on OneSTDV’s old blog about how the SWPL culture (who are not the ruling class, they are a jannisary class whose members range from coffeeshop hipsters to well paid professionals) is instinctually adopting a fly-under-the-radar white self preservation strategy?

[heartiste: i haven’t, but i agree with your take on swpl culture. one example of covert swpl white self-preservation: passing blue laws that outlaw the sale of 40s from liquor stores.]

– also, I threw out a theory that anti-racism, in favor of blacks above all, is driven by a profound pity more than by machiavellian maneuvering.

– your theory here suggests that extraneous factors aside, the white ruling class maintains a fraternal/tribal bond with their class-lesser, and a recallibration in their favor is not out of the question.

A lot of the special protections and programs that the SWPL folk build for minorities is really based on a sense that the minorities are inferior, and therefor need a leg up. Much like preferential hiring for the disabled. Children also enjoy more legal protections than adults, because it was determined that they need the extra protection.

Seriously, I’m biracial and I used to be in favor of the democratic party simply because I was misinformed and I was influenced by my surroundings. But over the course of my life, I feel like democrats are all stuck in this mental state and they don’t even question anything. I know a lot of people (friends, family, acquaintances) that vote Democrat and these are the same people that are always making racist jokes while at the same time wanting everyone to sing cum-bay-ya. They contradict themselves a lot. They will even stand up for things when someone on television is racist, but then will turn around and perpetuate the stereotypes. Liberals are so stuck-up, too. If you aren’t “in” or “trendy” it’s like you’re alien. If you aren’t the black person they see on television, you aren’t cool enough. I haven’t given Republicans a chance before but after I started talking to them they’ve become some of the most down-to-earth, friendly, and most common sense people. Have I been brainwashed?! I’m not even white – but it doesn’t matter. I’ve witnessed racism from all races and everything in-between. And honestly, a lot of liberals think that most Conservatives are racist, and while some can be, but a lot of them are not!

As long as you’re intelligent and contributing to something in society I think conservatives have no problem with you, but a lot of liberals don’t even recognize this.

Sounds like you’ve experienced the “Magic Negro” effect.
“We don’t really like all those people, but you’re great!” Remember how “well spoken and “clean” 0bama was, in the words of his colleagues (including his VP). Talk about dog whistles.

In my experience, all of the real racism (our White Power friends here notwithstanding) in America comes from the Left.

Leftist bigotry is all designed to keep everyone on their respective plantations – not simply black folk, but “Latino” folk, women folk, etc.

I’m in exactly your boat, except I don’t look obviously mixed w/ black (whites have often had an instinctual feeling I am not one of ‘them’ but they guess at half-Asian, Latino or a dozen different things. Blacks typically look at me as white or maybe Hispanic.) I stopped being a liberal when I was a kid and the one thing I’ve noticed about the leftists is they live in a cocoon which gives them reinforcement and reassurance that leaves them intellectually weak. We’re talking about brilliant people IN THEIR field who have little to no experience outside that field and the initiates who will form the next generation of elite academics are just as weak. For people who will bring up history to counter their opponents and pretend to objectivity (or as support in some snark-filled rant) have little sense of it and they are so hopelessly wedded to their meta-narratives that their philosophical and logical thinking is flaccid and blinkered.

In conversations you can see that look in people’s eyes that they’ve never encountered a fact or perspective that contradicted their internal programming. And I’m talking moments when I’m making hurried and somewhat basic points. Sadly, the brief moment of clarity I can sometimes see when their structures are challenged…I know it will pass and be subsumed in the mass of pretty lies to which they cling.

One good line to any liberal (or conservative, on occasion) when they advocate that the government do or pay for xxxx is to ask:
“Do you really think that xxxx is important enough that people should be FORCED to pay for it at gunpoint”.

We evolved in SMALL tribes, the idea of a ‘racial unity’ among a ‘white race’ in today’s population scale is frankly preposterous. A man may have stronger tribal allegiances to a few black buddies or his asian gaming nerd friends than to a Mitt Romney he never met in person.

There are no ‘white overlords’ who are unconsciously passing policies that result in screwing poor/middle class white people over, but rather special interest groups buying off legislators.

I think public choice economics does more to explain this decline you talk about than this farfetched evopsych reach.

Contrary to popular belief, especially in France and maybe Canada, some Americans are to varying degrees well educated, whether French was a priority or not in their schooling. And far from all on this blog are Americans anyway, you are obviously an example.

As for myself, I got school-boy French in my native Scandinavia, I have a US passport and I live in the Caribbean. Personally, I like quotes from Bastiat.
But this one is not from Bastiat: Dieu reconnaîtra les Siens.

That isn’t to say that people aren’t going to forge closer allegiances based on shared interests, sports teams, political views etc.

If you look at Pew attitude surveys pretty the majority in almost every country favour immigration restriction and preservation of their own culture. However, those ideas are very effectively demonized – so people risk loss of status by voicing them.

Arbitrary in the fact of having distinguishable, aggregate intelligence and behavioral patterns found within genetic cluster groups (also known as races?)

Race isn’t skin deep: you just use the skin, body types, hair types, etc, as a way to effectively predict someones behavioral patterns, possible allegiances, and their likely genetic relatedness to yourself.

Not that complicated, really. Even if race is a “social-construct,” then that’s a social construct I’m willing to base a large part of my societal foundation on. I mean, isn’t “communism” a social construct? That seems to have had some pretty profound effects on the happenings of man and history, don’t see why the concept of “race” as a unifier couldn’t be any less relevant for organizing men into self-identified homogenous groups effective at accomplishing the responsibilities of Nationhood.

OK, social construct. That the funny pieces of paper with mostly green ink (in the US, YMMV) that you carry in your pocket have value – that’s a social construct.

That you cannot consume more than you produce without somebody picking up the difference – willingly or unwillingly – that is a fact that is not a social construct.

That a society as a whole cannot consume more than it produces, that’s a fact that is not a social construct.
.
That the Titanic – or most other metal vessels – will sink if enough holes
are ripped in the hull – that’s a fact not a social construct.

“I think public choice economics does more to explain this decline you talk about than this farfetched evopsych reach.”

Every single study that I’ve read that details and describes societal dysfunction has high levels of economic inequality as a leading indicator. Both modern and ancient. Fex urbis, lex orbis and all that; class warfare is what destroys societies, not race per se.

Niggers are the ones benefiting from all this jew/cultural marxist conspiracy.
NIGGERS will prevail. And if they do, the odds of a violent death of human kind increases, and the odds of fulfilling the human potential wear off.

Marco, how old are you? You’re not old enough to know the US when it was 90% white (the 10% former slaves were around but were pretty much marginalised)or did you know the Europe of 30 years ago.I was born in England and my mother is English but was I viewed as a foreigner because my father was an American lol Yeah, that’s how it was and how clannish the entire country was a short time ago. The rest of Europe was the same.I can recall seeing Blacks on only a few occasions in London and they were obviously real Africans by their dress and either tourists or diplomats. In the Summer you might see some Asian(Indian) tourists but it was pretty much wall to wall White in UK and Europe. Swedes, despite their current reputation of being liberal were really clannish and would only marry another Swede. Not even a Norwegian! So entire countries pretty much thought the same way about certain things not just some small groups.

Yes and no. The US was never 90% White. There was a time when the US was 100% Native, but that changed rather rapidly after 1492.
I grew up in Austria (the ‘Isle of the Blessed’, as they called it at the time) and was 15 or 16 when I saw my first real life Black person on the street, must have been a diplomat or businessman from someplace in Africa.
There were Turks and refugees from Balkan countries in some areas, but they lived parallel but separate lives, rarely mingling with the rest of the population.
Swedes clannish?
Have to disagree on that one, old chap.
If I had a dime for every Swedish girl fucking an Italian, Moroccan or Israeli, I’d be driving my gold-plated Ferrari to my private yacht in Hawaii.

Given the totality of their victory, one wonders how there is any market at all now for Senior Black Writers at white feminist webzines such as “The Atlantic”.

If they would just explore other waters than their blackness, such as penning an essay on “Build Your Own Steam Engine” or “The History of Quilting in America” then they might have something to put on their resume besides “I’m Black”.

My job has landed me a place near the inner city. I work for a very large corporation (worldwide presence) that finds itself in both very affluent neighborhoods, as well as mixed economic, and impoverished neighborhoods, and even spots in rural areas. In this corporation I have worked in almost all the markets that this corporation finds itself. It has a diverse set of products.

Here is what I have found- In the inner city, poor whites and blacks have 5-8 babies. In fact, I was just offered an intern by a local broadcasting college (part of my business involves media creation) who was a 35 YO black woman with 5 (FIVE) kids. Applying for an unpaid internship. I thought I would give her a chance and she didn’t show up to work. Amazing.

Contrast that to the affluent white neighborhoods I have worked in. Two, maybe three kids (if there was an accident) and often one (negative population growth). They can afford contraception and abortions so they do them both, and further, there is no reward for having more kids like the poor whites or the poor blacks.

The rural areas still retain a sort of “state of nature” where the families are larger (a benefit to working the farms) and the dad is the Alpha, and the mom supports her husband.

What you say here I have witnessed over and over again working, as I have, for the last 8 years in my field. Not only have the cultural “Alphas” lost site…. we will be overrun in years to come. The election has shown this truth to be self evident.

..and here’s what the 2 suburban kids are doing: The girl tells her parents she’s going over to a friends’ house, while in reality she’s going downtown to fuck the Black ladies’ 5 sons.You’ll see her, 3 kids and 80- pounds later, on Jerry Springer, in hair-pulling screechfights with ‘her’ man’s 5 other whores. The boy plays video games in his room, jacks off on Manga girls and gets a PhD, but remains a virgin ’till his early 30’s – when a 50-something cougar takes pity on him.

It seems useless to complain, better to adapt. All civilizations have gone through upheaval. IUt does not mean there will not be opportunities to thrive. Sack up! Women don’t like crybabies.

[heartiste: would you have told martin luther king that it was useless to complain? how about the founding fathers and american colonists?
complaining is worthwhile when two conditions are met:
1. there is a possibility of rectifying the problem being complained about
2. there is lots of mirth to be had pissing off those who are part of the problem being complained about]

Yes, “adapt” because change is always good. Prohibition? That was great! Open classrooms? GREAT idea!! The “whole language” approach? We were told to “adapt” then too, as a generation of illiterates emerged.

Let’s see, then there was school bussing, the part-timing and outsourcing of jobs via NAFTA…adapt, adapt, adapt!!!

The whole adapt and change meme is so prevalent, you’d think it was invented by the ruling class to benefit their business interests. And you’d be right.

The verboten nature of the subject matter is what makes it sound like whining to you. These problems have been “officially” “solved.” Therefore anyone who persists discussing them will sound like they are uninformed about the glories of the utopia and the need to shut up about such “obsolete” issues so that no unnecessary friction is caused, disturbing the fake peace.

To verbally diagnose a problem among the like-minded is not complaining. It is a requirement of smart, deliberate action.

I think the racial argument is more valid than an economic one. I think white guilt put Obama over the top this time like last time. This time white libs wanted to prove that they’re “really, really not racists”.

I’ll have to check out Albion’s Seed to analyze your theory a bit more. Personally I think cultural Marxism at play here. The WRC is taking egalitarianism to an extreme by punishing the WWC through taxes, illegal immigration, AA, etc. This has been going on for half a century. Though its seems counterintuitive because a rising minority population will eventually swamp whites out of political control, perhaps the WRC thinks they can still maintain it, similarly to Brazil or Mexico, where the fair-skinned are the elite.

I tend to think that neither the the WRC, nor the corporate special interests are that farsighted though and they’re going for short term gains politically/cheap labor, at the expense of turning major metropolitan areas into the likes of Detroit and L.A. Buchanan had a great article a while back about how L.A. isn’t part of America anymore. Tens of millions of our fellow “citizens” don’t even identify as American (and they all voted for Obama!). Detroit may as well be another city in Africa.

It may be too late by the time this happens, but these white libs are going to have to wake up once minority violence comes knocking at their door and they see that black/brown/asian politicians will keep solidarity with their own groups sooner than show “tolerance” for white interests.

———————
“We are resolved to maintain the dignity of Rome, either in peace or war,” said the envoys, with a show of pride and valor. “If you will not yield us honorable terms, you may sound your trumpets and prepare to fight with myriads of men used to arms and with the courage of despair.”

“The thicker the hay, the easier it is mowed,” answered Alaric, with a loud and insulting laugh.

He then named the terms on which he would retreat,—all the gold and silver in the city; all the rich and precious movables; all the slaves who were of barbarian origin.

“If such are your demands,” asked the envoys, now reduced to suppliant tones, “what do you intend to leave us?”

“Your lives,” said Alaric, in haughty tones. The envoys retired, trembling with fear.

I think the racial argument is more valid than an economic one. I think white guilt put Obama over the top this time like last time.

I don’t think white guilt can explain it this time. Whites only voted 39% for Obama, versus 43% last time. According to exit polls, Obama lost whites in blue Illinois, California, Michigan, New Jersey, and Maryland. O even lost among white women. What happened is that Romney was underwhelming and appeared to promise more Bushism and Mideast war, so whites stayed home.

There was a lot of voter fraud in 2008, pretty much all from democrat voters.

Of course the main stream media pretty much ignored it because they are an arm of the left.

I would bet money that there was much more voter fraud this time around, but since the left is the establishment and controls almost everything we will barely hear about it and nothing will be done about it.

I’m not a conspirazoid, but I have yet to hear a satisfying theory other than massive fraud for why 2.5 million fewer voted against Obama this time than last time (while 9 million fewer voted for him). McCain was a better candidate than Romney? Economy, debt, spending, tax hikes, and entitlements are going swimmingly? Obama has a record of achievement we 58 million somehow missed?

I can understand why spooks and layabouts and daddyless whores stir themselves to vote. Their lives depend on it. But why did the anti-Obamites stay home? Their republic depended on it.

Romney won whites by twenty points. He won white men by 25. (And this is all based on polling data which for the first time excluded Texas and fourteen other red states that would have padded the numbers even more.) THANKS, SUFFRAGE.

Playing tug of war with the desperate dependency classes for king of the political spoils is a pointless game we cannot win frequently enough to undo the cumulative damage of their victories, even when we manage to keep their victories rare. The absurd re-upping of this talentless, unskilled cipher into the executive chair cinches it for me. Nationalized elections have ceased to be a viable solution.

In the off-years, white Republicans dominate the ballots, giving us a sustainable majority in the popular house. Without the shiny celebri-presidency to rally the unions and capture the imagination of the swarthy, responsible white people crush in localized contests.

Therefore, let them have the executive. A rehabilitated congress — the first article branch of the constitution — is the best answer to the imperial presidency. Our permanent majority of states (thirty governorships and 54 legislative chambers among 30-35 red states) will assure that the unpopular house (senate) and the popular house majorities (thanks, 2010 redistricting) can retain the federalist powers of the states, while the tax-, borrow-, and-binge social engineers are left holding the bag for the amateurish foreign policy, top-heavy administration, and unsustainable budgetry that is the hallmark of their rule. Cf. Mexifornia, bankrupt Ill-inois, and the impenetrably blue Northeast.

In other words, all white people meet in the North Dakota-Texas corridor. We will be the sheiks on top of the Bakken oil formation and the lords of the breadbasket until our segregated wealth engine, now quarantined from the coming bailouts and stagflation, can develop into a new industrial base. With Galt having repaired to the plains, the coasts must collapse of their own corruption into the moolie state of nature. The worst thing the animals can suffer is to live the consequences of their own behavior.

But we have to separate ourselves and erect borders between us and them. Otherwise, having ravaged the Rhodesian crops, the Zimbabwean locust swarm will alight on neighboring harvests as Maryland/DC has done to Virginia, California is doing to Nevada, and Mexico is doing to the entire sieve-bordered southwest. (Or as the PIIGS are trying to do to Germany.) Once the coasts have become Detroit, they will turn to the wealth producers for the inevitable bailout. What will our defensive fortifications look like then? It should be a first branch vs. second branch showdown, backed up by the solid heartland bloc of red senators, representatives, governors, statehouses and legislatures.

I will be revisiting Paine, Henry, and the testicularly endowed genius class of the revolutionary era for specifics — we have faced longer odds before. It’s the thing to do in the run-up to the next inauguration, having just conclusively learned that ordinary methods will no longer suffice.

I can understand why spooks and layabouts and daddyless whores stir themselves to vote. Their lives depend on it. But why did the anti-Obamites stay home? Their republic depended on it.

I’m anti-Obama, but I voted third party for president (otherwise, GOP). Romney, in many ways, posed problems as bad as Obama, only different. For example, a slavish devotion to Israel and an intent to start more Mideast war with Iran and maybe Syria.

I’m not a bit surprised that Obama’s vote fell by 9 million — entirely due to a drop in support from whites — and that Romney still lost.

Obama has a record of achievement. Osama bin Laden and GM, just to start. Read some current events journals; The Economist is a good place to start (a largely conservative mag that, surprise, endorsed Obama). You’ll find things called facts in its pages.

Obama is a “talentless, unskilled cipher”? Well, if you’re resorting to name-calling, that means you’ve already lost the debate.

Hate to inform you, but unions are a majority white people. In fact, 11 percent of all whites are union members. (13% of blacks can say the same, 10% of Asians, and 9% of Latinos.) This is from the National Journal, which I found in a five-second Google search. You can do the same.

“Once the coasts look like Detroit?” You have it exactly backwards. The coasts ARE the producers of wealth, and will continue to be. The red states ARE the takers of government largesse, the makers of divorce and violent gun death. They don’t have the infrastructure to become major producers of wealth.

Re: Romney: You conveniently overlook the fact that Mittens is a six-foot-tall walking example of the reason nobody in the Midwest is working today. They saw in his shining pink cheeks the very portrait of corporate greed. And they rejected it.

Get your head out of Herodotus. You are the reason why Republicans were so surprised by the shellacking they received. I welcome you to join me in the reality-based community.

Yes and no. A big drop in the number of voters is not an indication of fraud, it is however an indication of apathy – or disgust with both of the main contenders.

But Obama’s “achievements” are illusory – at best. Offing OBM was a nice coup, but mostly without any real consequences. – the roots of Islamofascism run deep.

Saving GM? Don’t make me laugh. Given enough billions of borrowed money backed by the presumed ability of taxing future generations I could save any company. Additionally, the underlying message to labor unions is that they need not worry about sucking the host dry – Uncle will come to the rescue.

The coasts are yesterday’s “producers of wealth.” They are taxing, regulating, and corrupting themselves into stagnation. Or are you not familiar with the migration south and west, or the balance sheets and scandals of CA, IL, and NY compared to TX, ND, and IN?

But it sounds like we’re largely on the same page. You can have those economic juggernauts Detroit, Philadelphia, and Baltimore. Throw in the largest state in the union plus the entire Northeast while we’re at it. Take Chicago too. Just leave us alone in flyover country. Then we will have a real experiment with the laboratories of democracy, “testing whether that nation, or any nation, so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.”

Let’s talk again after the Fed and Treasury inflate and credit-downgrade their way out of an ability to pay for your “humane” social engineering projects and entitlements. Let’s see what true “producers of wealth” you are at 10% interest rates and negative growth. Your idea of job creation is subsidizing ideological projects, like Solyndra. Our idea is innovating technology to extract expensive oil from shale. Result: Cali with nearly $1T debt, citizens fleeing, and 9% unemployment, and ND with surpluses, low taxes, and 3% unemployment.

The parasites are already flooding Texas, Nevada, and Virginia, and it’s not for the local cuisine. It’s because that’s where the future is. And it is only the future because your ilk hasn’t raped and soiled it yet, as the parasitic do once they’ve stripped the carcass of their original hosts. Yes, there is still meet on the bones around you, and no, labor isn’t perfectly fluid. But “infrastructure” means nothing if you are producing nothing, and we already would have built the pipelines if a malicious incompetent in the executive’s house weren’t playing a grand game of wealth-transfer at the point of a gun.

As for your fantasizing about the permanence of blue state cultural superiority, read Charles Murray’s Coming Apart and then we can chat. You live conservatively and preach the opposite, ever so compassionately subsidizing the 70% illegitimacy and genocidal abortion rates among blacks in the name of their “freedom.” Of course, this is only so long as they aren’t close enough to smell or to be victimized by their crime. They are tucked far away in the red south where you can send federal food stamps electronically but don’t have to worry about them swarming your Whole Foods store. What do you imagine the divorce rates among the whites of red states is? Did you really think it’s substantially more than blue rates? Could the 30-40% black population in the south have something to do with their states being the “takers of government largesse, the makers of divorce and violent gun death”?

Also, through various brute tactics, the Romney campaign essentially told Paul and supporters, who commanded – I don’t know – maybe a solid 10% of Repblican voters and who was garnering statistically significant interest from disgurntled anti-war liberals, to get the hell out of the party.

Depends on you definition of “cities”. The innermost cities in the US – I might agree. But organizing businesses is actually useful. So is inventing and developing new technologies. Etc. Lets not go for the “farmers and workers. are th only ones that produce” BS,

I totally agree with this. The kind of candidate the Republicans needed during an economic crisis like this was someone like Reagan — a guy who went to Eureka college and was self-made, not Romney, who was closely affiliated with non-US “global” corporations who killed US jobs.

The closest the Republicans came to this kind of salt-of-the-earth character was Chris Christie.

Romney had the experience of successfully leading and turning around public and private organizations. I could see him at least having a shot at righting this particular ship.

Obama by contrast seems hopelessly out of his depth if you read the papers or even someone like Bob Woodward. His ostensible helpers are running the show and making the deals. And really, who would be surprised at this? Just read his resume.

It wasn’t just white SWPL guilt. When 93 percent of black voters choose Obama u know its race. Obama isn’t so good that he deserves 13 to 1 voting favor from any demographic or race unless it was motivated purely on race.

I also think there was fraud going on. At one point in the night Romney had 32mln votes and obama had 30.5 million. This is a 5 percent lead for obama yet obama was pulling almost eve to over 5 percent lead in swing States…not expected States but swing States. When I watched the news even some of the forecasters looked surprised. The other rigged one was Bush Gore, which I didn’t believe before but I do now. What are the odds that elections start becoming so close all the sudden. Pretty remote, and only having to only ‘fix’ the swing States makes it too easy.

Heartiste, you are actually on the cusp of peeling back the layers of the onion to reveal the true stench of this thing. You are close to unveiling the truth of the matter regarding modern day America, which is this: the battle is now between the Haves and the Have-nots. This has been stewing in the pot for a generation and now the boiling has commenced.

This isn’t new. Around the civil war era there was a similar situation with Northern elites (and blacks after the civil war) being republicans with white southerners and poorer northern white immigrants being democrats. In order to get power, groups will naturally join a single political party.

I think that American/Canadian/Anglo PUAs should study these pics and articles from Australia… bogan is the end point of the trajectory that is PUA game. How so? The bogan is the PUA whose game (insofar as a bogan can be said to have any form of rudimentary game) has become exhausted by women who have become indifferent to the performing seal that resides in the heart of Everybogan. Game does not work in Australia, and the world is becoming increasingly bogan. Does our very own CH admire bogans? I’d hope not, but what do we make of his conflation of bogan Corry Worthington with Dominant Alpha? If there is the remotest trace of alpha in adolescent bogans, then rest assured that as a product of adolescent fantasy and obsession, it does not endure into adulthood. Australia is the laboratory that should have us all questioning the relevance of PUA game. Of course to heed my warning, you need to see the parallels that exist between emotionally stunted bogans and manipulating PUAs who derive their sense of purpose from validation from women.

I think just by knocking women off the pedestal, that’s huge in terms of making men question everything.

After the red pill, I see everything in terms of shit tests, social domaniance and power plays. Conversions with friends, co-workers, strangers. Every damn thing is simply people power grabbing.

Also, Heartiste tugs on the very root of the whole damn system. The biggest motivator on earth for men is pussy. Once you convince guys that the way society wants you to go with will A) not get you laid often and B) those lays with be with average women, it’s game over. Well at least for guys that are young and unmarried.

How did feminism come about? Promises of Pussy.

How will feminism end? Promises of Pussy.

Destroying feminine impertative is just the gateway drug. It’s the weed of being a contranian of society.

The Judeo-Protestant attitude (actually Calvinist, but Calvinism is the heart and soul of Protestantism) is that God rewards you with money if you’re good. Or that, if you have money, it’s because you’re blessed by God. Ergo, if you do not have money, you’re cursed. This is one reason why Protestant powers — the Netherlands, Britain, Germany, Switzerland, Scandinavia, and the United States — have been “better” (i.e., more cutthroat) with money and capital. This also extends to a willingness to throw overboard those whites who don’t do well with money.

But they still fear lower-class whites (for example, the Irish subjects of the British), so they play nonwhites off against them.

A few weeks back I was driving down the road and saw a group of teenagers at a sheltered bus stop in a middle class neighborhood that butts up against a few Section 8 apartment complexes. The group had 2 thin blond white girls sitting on the bench with 2 jig males sitting on their laps. Standing up were 3 dopey looking white-boys playing beta orbiters. It was pathetic. I almost stopped to chastise these pussy white guys on what losers they were for 1) not having the chicks on their laps and 2) playing 2nd fiddle to some loser hood rats. This shit would have never happened back in the 80’s or 90’s where I’m from. Show some respect for yourselves young white men.

An intriguing analysis. Following this premise, I however would argue that the ” cultural eugenics” was not laid down with the best interests of the WWC at heart. The WRC set it up to weed out and bar entry for those not thought suitable to enter their elite strata, and to select for and then shape those found suitable by those same standards. They may have thought this would be beneficial for the WWC in that a select few would be proven and elevated, while the rest would be lead by those properly trained in the acceptable ideas and cultural views, but that was likely a post hoc rationalization.

The unprecedented prosperity of the West allowed the WRC to further distance themselves from the WWC they looked down on. The WWC’s inherent inferiority was necessary as justification for thier rule. Also, cultural loyalty did nothing to increase power or profits in their eyes. So decades of prosperity were used to distract and calm the WWC while they further distanced themselves form their “inferior” brothers and instituted changes that would shame cultural views that didn’t fit their plans and that would pit the various underclasses against each other. While the country was prosperous this was seen as only a bizarre nuisance by the WWC, or at most as a disturbing insult to the their values. Only in the near future will it be recognized as a threat/control plan by the masses. The growing globalization and international rise of corporations also let the WRC ( and worldwide ruling classes) find suitable serfs to work in their factories in other countries. No longer were they bound to ruling only those in their geographical region; this freed them up to attempt to pacify the resistant middle class with cultural programs and the force of demographics/immigration along with the media and legislation.

I think the evidence points to the “cultural eugenics” being a method of preventing competition from the middle class, not as a rite of passage. The rite of passage element may have been there in the past, but I would argue that it was stronger under the early American “aristocracy” that believed it was shepherding the people along the path to a idealized country of individual freedoms and constitutional rights. As the WRC moved away from that ideal of themselves, the “cultural eugenics” came to serve to role it had in most societies throughout history: that of preventing competition from the lower classes by limiting access to power, and setting up the justification for their higher status in society by crafting an image of ideological unfitness on the part of dangerous elements of the lower classes. (Such as those who believe in such troublesome concepts as constitutional limits on government and equal treatment under the law of both the rulers and the ruled. This cultural block of the WWC had to have all of it’s core beliefs legislated and shamed out of existence so that they, among others, would not be a coherent force of resistance to the WRC’s will.) On occasion useful or acceptable individuals of the lower classes are allowed up into the elite circles, but that serves more as a release valve, allowing hope of personal ascendancy among the WWC and other underclasses so that they do not move towards open rebellion.

I think your characterization of it being an organic phenomena is correct, but I believe it to be more the manifestation of the subconscious drive to push out competitors and secure the rights of the rules than the desire to test and elevate the lower class hopefuls. An element of that exists, but the results of these forces speak to the former being the core of it rather than the latter.

Although most blacks would try to deny this, I would like them to explain why black women spend thousands of dollars per year on straightening their hair and dying it a lighter color or spend thousands of dollrs a year on wigs that look more caucasian than african???

Why do they want to have non-african hair???

If white women are not better looking then why try to look more white???

Because if you don’t tan you encounter comments just as “You look like a ghost”, “Have you ever tried to leave the house and get some sun?” on a nearly daily basis.
Personally i couldn’t care less, but most just want to conform…

There are two types of white people, or maybe a continuum. Those who, like me, are pasty white when not exposed to sunlight, but who tan fairly easily when exposed to the sun. Then those who are just as pasty white without sunlight, but who tan only slightly and with difficulty, such as my wife (now passed away) and her blood relations. The latter is a fairly serious condition if you no longer live in the far North, UK and northward. My father in law got skin cancer while living in Hawaii – they cured him, and he died much later of unrelated causes.

You don’t have to tell me…My ancestors are from eastern prussia and without sunscreen factor 50 i won’t make it through summer without looking like a lobster…I should move to Japan, my skin tone would be highly coveted there 🙂

Tanning has nothing to do with race, funnily enough.
Looking at countries mostly dominated by white people:

Back in 1900 when most white people (indeed most people regardless of color) spent their time working in the fields, especially in the boreal summer, the class marker was really WHITE skin, not as a marker of race but of class – you didn’t have to spend your day baling hay, but you were boss class working in an office – even if as a lowly clerk.

Half a century or so later, most people worked in offices and factories, i.e. indoors. So they stayed pasty white. The upper crust could afford long vacations sailing and playing tennis etc. During the boreal winter they could travel south – this was then something only the rich could afford. Skiing in Swiss Alps, surfing in Hawaii, whatever. Thus somewhat tanned skin as a class marker. And note that a pure white (i.e. of _Northern_ European ancestry) person, when tanned, does not typically have the same hue as those who are genetically a little darker. So being white-but-tanned became the class marker par excellence.

I see it more as conspicuous leisure – a high status white demonstrates his superiority to non-whites by adopting anti-white policies, the presumption being that his superiority is such that he will still be higher status than the non-whites even with these disadvantages. Many urban liberal whites also seem to enjoy the elite status mass third world immigration provides them. Live in a typical American city that is 75%+ 3rd world migrant and the mere fact of being white will generally be sufficient to place an average middle class white among the elite in terms of wealth, looks and intelligence. The 3rd worlders merely become Huxley’s Deltas and Epsilons serving in the background.

It is similar in function to how a small hunter-gatherer tribe has rites of passage for its adolescent males, and how the tribe will viciously ridicule members who fail at a task or embarrass themselves in some manner. The purpose is not to kill them off, but to make them stronger. More like the alphas of the tribe.
—————————————-
The elite has always had its rites of passage but the problem is that those rites of passage now constitute the celebration of self-abnegation. Fromhttp://takimag.com/contributors/contributor_feed/AllenMendenhall/

The failure of the aristocratic class—what’s left of it—to distinguish the moral from the immoral, the good from the bad, has created a society that determines public policy and (mis)educates its citizens based on indefinable concepts with no direct relation to the phenomenal world. Diversity and multicultural mania, besides signifying nothing, have made us slaves of false virtues, enablers of cultural and economic regression, and perpetuators of self-imposed discipline and denial.

**************************
Most of our problems are currently spiritual in nature yet we lack the ability to believe; the progressive series of taboos has a lot of things that it is against but nothing that is life-affirming. At one time politics was about great men, it was about honor, it was about preserving the one’s heritage – the family and the sacred. Now politics is about coming up with the appropriate legal fiction to pay for the poopy diapers of the unfit mothers of democracy and taking a 2nd and 3rd mortgage on the nations productive capacity to push old people around in wheelchairs to be administered by bureaucrats who are able to achieve privilege by denouncing it. All of this is described as progress. The key existential crisis of our age can be summed up in one sentence: People differ in both values and abilties. This is a spiritual crisis as much as an economic one.

Nyet! Crony capitalism is not free market capitalism. Romney was a fake capitalist.

Also, racial alienation is a losing strategy. As long as the Republican Conservatives in Name Only (CINOs) remain white, and old, and male, they will continue to lose elections.

Keep alienating naturally socially conservative groups and the CINO party will stay on the margins.

Facts:
– A few decades ago, black Americans had lower rates of illegitimacy than whites do today. White illegitimacy rates are higher now than the black out-of-wedlock birthrates that existed at the time of the Moynihan Report.
– Black votes scuttled Gay marriage in California angering gays who then turned on blacks.
– Blacks and Hispanics probably have higher churchgoing rates than whites.
– Want to see the socialist welfare state in action? Go to Europe.
– Want to see a country where out-of-wedlock births are the norm? Go to Europe.

As long as the wn geniuses who comment regularly on this blog remain the core of the CINO party, the Democrats will continue to win.

Cinosaurs were heavily into racial purity until reality eased them out of existence. All this wailing and caterwauling isn’t about conservatism; it’s about looming irrelevance. And, it’s mostly self-inflicted.

“Keep alienating naturally socially conservative groups and the CINO party will stay on the margins.”

To which groups are you referring? Maybe it’s hispanics, who give birth to children out of wedlock 53% of the time? Or maybe it’s blacks, who do so 73% of the time? Nope? It MUST be the American Indian population, who give birth outside of marriage 66% of the time?

Get a clue jackhole. Gibsmedats vote for free cheese, not for God and country.

I’d say it’s just plain old short term self-interest, coupled with globalisation. The WRC aren’t tied to the national project like they once were because now money can go anywhere – not just hiding in gated communities – politicians are always pointing out that we should be more accommodating of the greed of the rich because if we don’t they’ll take off for greener pastures. But it’s this mobility that means they don’t have to throw bones to the WWC anymore – it doesn’t matter if America (or Britain, in my case) is a nice place to live because now the WRC can always fuck off somewhere else and take everything with them. So now the WWC is in for a dose of the same asset-stripping policies the WRC has spent the last 40 years imposing on people in weaker countries. They didn’t lose their sense of shared destiny and obligation. It just isn’t any use to them anymore, so they ditched it.

Blame it on anybody you like. The reality is that being a low-skill person, sometimes equated with the WWC (not the same but there is a huge overlap), with globally movable goods and services, there is just no reason to pay MUCH more for low skill in Detroit than in Manila, in Luton than in Mumbai.

So without any conspiracy or mens rea anywhere, the wages of low skill workers will converge – at least partially – between countries. Good for Mumbai, not so good for Luton.

Above and to the side (whispering and pissing in their ears) of the White Ruling Class you have the JZC (Jewish Zionist Class) exerting their influence.

After all; you don’t need explicit power and control when you can have influence permeating throughout all levels of the WRC.
Just make it seem that it’s the WRC’s ideas all along and that they can continue making more money.

Not that I think there will ever be a day on which we, meaning everyone here except you, will avenge ourselves on the major architects of our downfall and their abettors, BUT IF THERE WERE, Whiskey — you would of the latter, you faggot lickspittle fucking goy.

As David Brooks points out, the current ruling class doesn’t even think that they are the ruling class. The former hippies, jews, blacks, etc. who rule the country, people whose dad’s were in the middle class two generations ago think that they are the underdogs. They still think in terms of Mad Men style WASP country clubs. Haven’t been in country clubs for five generations? OK, then I am a REBEL and certainly not member of the ruling class LOL. They think that Skull and Bones runs the world and if you aren’t a Bones man then you can’t be in the ruling elite.

David Gelernter points out in America Lite how the old WASP elite engaged in suicide.

So, there is no class structure, just a mess of delusional people. There are no entrenched families with ancient lineage to act as a bastion of tradition and reason like you had in Britain, Greece and Rome. You just have a bunch of silly narcissisits full of anger and envy who stumble into power (Clinton and Obama). They are the beta males. The old WASP elite is the old guard (Romney and the Bush’s).

You wonder why the negative ads worked so well on Romney, everyone hates an old school WASP plutocrat. What isn;t discussed on this site is how much hatred beta’s have for alphas. Look at any gorilla tribe. Betas are not passively subservient, but usually full of anger and rage at their lowly position. They constantly scheme and plan their attack to unseat the alpha. Alpha don’t last long in the sun under constant attacks. Here is a handy bit of advice: never let a beta see who you are banging. You wonder why a failed black man was supported above a clearly superior WASP? You wonder why mexicans, blacks and jews will always vote democrat? How blue collar whites cost Romney wisconsin, iowa, ohio and minnesota? Beta hatred.

I always got the feeling that American women got really fat so that the WRC would do everything to corner the market on the few remaining slender chicks from the WWC.

As well, as the WRC stupidly embraced womens’ rights, they unwittingly embraced feudalism, which is the optimal form of government for women deluded into thinking they will have the same SMV at 45 as 21.

The election proved that American women and government hold all the power now.

The rules and cultural norm is painfully apparent to me as a foreign born American.

Just today ]sitting in Starbucks, I witnessed a newly wedded woman with a butch haircut on a date with a balding writer… I bet her husband is totally oblivious… she even had the audacity to keep her ring on and suggest the idea of going back to his place. At a table besides me there was a “group interview” initiation into the burning bra cult being conducted by man-jawed feminists, who were hiring liberal art women into their green start up non-profit.

The gears of society has turned, as the baby boomer generation has failed in every regard to fight PC, socialism, communism and feminism.

As an alpha millennial, the best is to adapt, accept the rules of the game and maximize my returns while sipping on soy latte.

Remember this: more niggers have chimped out in the past week than white men will ever chimp out. But we do it for theatrical effect, to “prove a point”, so it becomes big news, whereas the daily shooting in Oakland, Miami, or Chicago is local news only.

This reflects population pressures on our respective subspecies: black men fare worse under conditions of high civilization than white men. But we are both strained by these conditions into maladaptive behaviors.

“There is not a white race.” – ha!
Those people never read or bother to know about evolution or Charles Darwin (btw a eugenist himself). There are species, species contain subgroups with different qualities that compete with each other for supremacism over the ambient wich they occupy. These subgroups are called races.
The subtitle to Darwin’s book is “The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life”.
Do you think evolution stopped a long time ago? No, evolution is (always) on the making, dumbass. Evolution is happening right now and the white race is on the losing team… when someone say to me “the white race is superior” I laugh with despair, superior is the group which can perpetuate itself, and we’re not doing it.
But this is typical marxism crap, if your race doesn’t exist you don’t really have to defend anything, so comfortable to our couch potato mindset.
Even the most frivolous motive, the white race extreme beauty, should be a motive to advance our interests.

By a white brazilian to my fellow white americans, I believe in America, don’t let this magnificent piece of art designed by the founding fathers be outlashed by the brown masses. Don’t be a Brazil2,..

Respectfully, I don’t think that the newspaper descriptions and/or drawings of those days compares impact-wise to the 24/7 bombardment via television and Internet today. If television and Internet are no more impactful than newspapers and drawings, why have television and Internet become today’s preferred political medium?

Humans are visual creatures, especially the males. And the extant research clearly shows how much physical appearance impacts hiring, promotion, salary, etc.

Bullseye!
Didn’t they twist themselves into all sorts of pretzel shapes to keep the fact that FDR was wheelchair-bound a secret? And that was even before the age of television, when people were probably a lot less shallow and sound-bitten than they are today.

“Samuel Lincoln “Sam” Seder (born November 28, 1966) is a comedian, writer, actor, film director, television producer-director, and talk radio host. Seder was born in New York City, New York into a Jewish family”

@aperaspera whoever’s handy, whether it’s the President, a random guy on the news, some dude who just scored a touchdown, whoever. you have to have a bogeyman to whom focus can be shifted.
wrc panders to wwc with whatever wrc thinks will get the biggest emotional rise, good or bad, to keep wwc from focusing too much on the many ways that wrc’s system keeps everyone who participates in it – white, black and everyone in between – running in place like the red queen.
this is the biggest trick that rich white people have been playing on working class white people since before the revolution.
the real question is whether the kinship that wwc feels for wrc is in any way reciprocal, and was it ever?

Well, I can think of alternative explanations, not mutually exclusive to CH’s take.

Mainly, the WRC feels a little guilty (rightly or wrongly doesn’t matter) over their power position. So to feel better, the decide to bring in more equality, mainly by sacrificing the WWC and the White Middle Class, including all but the very Uppermost White Middle Class, the latter touching on the WRC itself.

So they make this noble sacrifice, which cleverly costs them very little, since they are rarely the ones getting sacrificed. And it not only buys them cred with minorities, but it makes them FEEL BETTER about themselves, how Liberal they are.

So the thing is a morality play.

Slightly off this topic, I would like to analyze the WRC’s handling of Sarah Palin. (This is NOT a point of praising or putting down SP, I am purely talking about the WRC’s reaction.) Now, SP has as one part of her image that she wears heavy lipstick (prompting Obamas’s low jibe about lipstick on a pig).

Now, when she was on the speech circuit, part of her contract was to be given water in a mug with a straw (or flexible straw). This showed some planning – if she drank from a glass, the cameras would zoom in the red smears on the glass to make her look ridiculous.

What she and her handlers did not know was that part of the ritual of the WRC is to never be caught drinking through a straw, with narrow exceptions (beach, McD – if you ever go there , under 12 y.o etc). So they made a big deal of this part of her contract. The message, readily understood by other members of the WRC but few others (such as your humble narrator): “She is a country bumpkin, unworthy of consideration. She may be white and a governor but NEVER one of us”.

If I had been the manager I would have gone for glasses made of BLACK glass, to avoid this debacle.

If you want to know the future of the US, look south. Not to Mexico, but to Brazil. A huge, federal country, with a strong and corruption-ridden federal government, one dominant party, one major contender which never gets to grab the Presidency or the Senate, and a plethora of small parties for sale to the highest bidder.
A miscigenated society, mostly composed of impoverished black and white mixed masses, governed both politically and financially by the top 10% of white European descent.
A declining infrastructure, crumbling roads, cities and airports. Almost inexistant police power, over thirty thousand crime-related murders per year. And, to top it off, a “culture” mostly concerned with overt sexuality and sports.
That’s America’s future.

Seems likely, unfortunately. But what does “crime related murders” mean?’ Are they not all crime-related by definition? Or do you mean robberies, where the death is sortof incidental? Or all murders except crimes of passion?

the key to all this is definitely freudian. make the wwc better players sexually and they will be more powerful societally. i guess once the wwc hits more than 5% artificial alphas, the wrc will have a real enemy to contend with. the answer to 1984 is 1776

They’re (the WRC) simply becoming less civilized. Chimps live with Alpha males lording it over their lessers. But the average Alpha chimp doesn’t die peacefully. He dies in agony, his face, hands and balls ripped off when a younger pretneder to the throne – or a pack of them – catch the old man off guard.

Tribal humans aren’t a whole lot better.

Civilization was a bargan where Alphas gave up a little of their perks in exchange for not having to worry about getting stabbed in the back.

The problem we have is we let women and gammas have a say in running society. Neither one understands just exactly what “alpha” really is or why civilization is important. They have little ability to trade off a little immediate gratification in exchance for large future gains. So they throw it all away.

Civilization is basically a power sharing agreement between alpha and beta men. Letting others into the deal was a bad, bad idea.

Because when you game any women, you’re doing it within the socio-political context of their country/ethnic group/class. So it pays to know what you’re dealing with. For more info, check Roosh’s writing on gaming women from different countries.

It is relevant, to some extent.
I learned that lesson back in the 80’s, when you could pretty much kiss any chances of sex good-bye if the girls as much as SUSPECTED you of having any right/conservative/pro-Reagan tendencies. Game or no game.

Yup. I have lived this, as have some of my friends. One friend had a Western (book) lying on his nightside table. He had actually written it.
Girl saw it, asked a few questions, and then walked out in disgust of having nearly fucked a “fascist”.

I think times have changed on that. Most of the chicks I have banged were either apolitical or liberal. My crowning achieveent was banging a bonafide Organizing for America , Obama’s campaign organization, chick. She was at that point actively woo elect a democrat governor. I told her that candidate woud lose, and that I had volunteered for all sorts of republican candidates. Like on the failed McCain campaign. She apparently thought my defiance was cool. At the time I felt a little disturbed that she actively worked against everything it is to be a freedom loving white man…so I left in the morning without giving her a way to contact me.

This blog has essentially two tracks, with some overlap. The tracks are game and variations for one, and various metapolitics for the other. You can choose which threads to follow, and stay off the ones that are not of interest to you.

The politics studied on this blog is to determine the social forces that cause women to choose to become obese. Like it or not, in the post peak hour glass figure era, one needs to understand these political trends in order to obtain the shrinking resources of slender women.

So Kirstie Alley is on the Jimmy Kimmel show right now, and she just told a “funny” story about how she would FORCE her infant brother to show his penis to her female friends and charge her friends 15 cents to see it. Of course the crowd was laughing.

The latter, while somewhat understandable at the time, was a disaster. It would have been enough to forbid the states from MANDATING discrimination, which many did. Most business though discrimination was a headache to implement. The act had two terrible consequences.:

1) It was a wedge against the right to contract – with anybody under mutual consent.

2) The corrollary of anybody who had “disproportionate” hiring (except ball teams) being subject to endless litigation with strongly reverse burden of proof, you had PROVE that statistical discrepancies were not due to racism.

Bob Whitaker has a fascinating explanation of the concept of allies, top and bottom against the middle, in this podcast.

[audio src="http://www.whitakeronline.org/audio/allies2.mp3" /]

If you don’t know who Bob Whitaker is, he’s the one responsible for the terms anti-white and white genocide appearing everywhere on the web including this blog. He is the author of what is known as the Mantra, that paragraph designed to get white people onto a consistent message. He has had a long and storied career in Washington power politics. His other podcasts at that site are well worth a listen.

In social Darwinism, it it not the fittest that survives. It is the most numerous–essentially, the weak. Weakness is easier, therefore there is much more of it. Republicans cannot appeal to strength and personal initiative and expect to win. Not any more.

The idea that the elites set up barriers to steel the souls of the lowers, in the hopes of raising them up, only works when there’s a true kinship feeling.

I fear that has disappeared, in no small part because of unholy alliances with those-who-don’t-really-control-the-media-or-finances-or-anything-else-you’re-just-jealous… because the amount of cultural filth and decline is too much of a “chastening” to do anything but lower all to the lowest common denominator.

And elites being allegedly smart and able to see the writing on the wall, know that, in the end, it will engulf them as well… or at least their direct kin with whom they can presumably still identify.

In short, it’s not an issue of “whom I love I chasten and rebuke” divinity… it’s an “I got mine and screw YOU, even if it means my own children are ruined” type of cut-off-one’s-nose satanism.

Not realizing that, for their so-called elite friends and allies of the ‘other’ kind, it boils down to a) the name of Christ must perish from the earth, and b) we are your true Lords and must be glorified as such, even if means we preside over nothing more than a giant dung heap… the mark of Satan, if there ever was one.

On a side note, I’m trying to remember this sci-fi short story I read awhile back whose name and author escapes me…

It entailed a man who set himself up and the blackest traitor in the world, presumably giving aid and comfort to an alien race and showing them how to destroy some of Earth’s weapons. It turns out he did this because he saw how effete and complacent earth men were becoming and he knew the initial victories of the aliens would serve as a “wake-up” call and allow the human race to eventually triumph and survive… even though his name would forever be tarred and used as a curse by his own people.

In the end, he managed to destroy the ship of the leader alien and assure earth’s victory, but did it in a way that couldn’t be traced back to him, and I believe although he sacrificed himself in the destruction of that ship, he made it appear as if he got away, and hence would always be a threat to earth… to insure that earthmen would continue to be on their guard and strive for greater technological accomplishments and survival of the planet.

One of the better post election pieces I have read. Some things which you pointed towards but did not touch on occur to me. From what I can see and think of as an historical perspective there is a very nearly eternal class of human predator. In earlier days they were something as simple as the mounted man with a handful of friends, or perhaps crew in modern terms. Maybe the guy who lived in a stone place for when the Vikings showed up. At one time they served a purpose but as quickly as possible shuffled that off in favor of hereditary privilege.

They have not gone away by any means, Lenin, guillotines, and Mao notwithstanding. They simply morphed into the socialist self proclaimed elite. In their view the population is too, well, just ‘too’ everything to be able to decide their own lives in any way so the credentialed expert must step in. Nanny Bloomberg stage right for one sad example. And, all the while they demand to dictate the most petty details of average lives they reserve the right to live as they please. Corporate jets? very bad especially if a man earned that money with his own hands. Air Force One for a 90 mile trip? AH, but of course, as the fictional Sen Blutarsky once said, ‘it don’t cost nuthin’.

Look at the decades of encroaching authoritarianism masquerading as well intentioned noblesse oblige. Specifically look to the national decision to ‘Bestow’ the ‘Markers’ of middle class life in order to expand the middle class. But middle class life and it’s markers were the result of an ethos and protracted process of postponed self gratification, strength, endurance, sacrifice, service and stoicism. Giving what is not earned the obvious way cheapens not only the gift, but the ethos. Why bother to do any of that if all you need do is ask? Equally why cheapen a demonstrably proven and socially useful set of values? Easy, silly individual, if the standard is weakened enough then soon enough the only way anybody succeeds is through the right people, and besides it wouldn’t do for the new aristocracy to have a segment of the population, no matter how small, that is strong and self possessed, now would it? That would always leave some kind of back door open to personal accomplishment.

Perhaps more importantly, rather than there being an open if uncertain and probably difficult road to a man’s chosen destination, now there are guardians who will, “Bestow”. Look at the mega investor behind Solyndra, Kaiser. A brilliant man of some huge accomplishments, so why would he be toying with something that was a popcorn farm from the outset? Because now the straight line between 2 points is manipulating government regulations rather than producing; it is far easier to play word games with bought politicians than to get a lease and put steel to dirt and turn to the right. Once upon a time the guardians were called kings, and princes, dukes and counts, now they are bureaucrats or more simply, commissars. Based on the useful idiocy they seem so able to recruit I cannot help but think there is going to be one Hell of a bottleneck, of how shall we say? the enlightened.

From what I see, it isn’t any new WRC or something peculiar to this time and place at all. It is a con, the most ancient con on Earth. The one that says, you give me your money, your life, your choices, and I, great pharoah, will make your decisions for you, and better off shall you be for it, nameless peasant. The terminology is changed, but the equation would be readily recognizable to any autocrat of old. Even better than the divine right of kings, they now can co-opt members of the despised peasantry to help enforce it. All in the name of fairness, an ever changing chimera that like 3 card monte always delivers up the same result.

Heartiste: I’m so glad to see you finally including big-name conservatives in your tweets. The likes of Sean Hannity need more input from you (and they will naturally start reading your site as a result, and hopefully give the Republicans what they truly need most of, game-inspired balls.)

I noticed how solipsist SWPL liberals who support affirmative action never seem to understand that they are talking about their own ethnic group losing jobs and college admissions that they have earned. Yet none of them are willing to forgo their jobs or studies at a university for a non-Asian minority.

Then an idea struck me: the reason behind this apparent contradiction has to do with competition. Working class whites would be the ones getting the raw deal with affirmative action, not SWPL liberals. In hurting the working class members of their own race, SWPL liberals get diversity status. Steve Sailer once wrote an article about how diversity status is a major driving force of the liberal mindset.

The ONLY certain variable in all of this is the coefficient of inbreeding. Liberals are more outbred while Jews are more inbred, together they constitute an unstoppable block against more (historically) inbred lower class whites. The latter ARE NOT their own “race”. We are in the same phenotype, but we are further from each other GENETICALLY than Jews and Syrian Druze are. Let that sink in.

I can’t believe President Obama’s luck. First, he received over 99% of the vote in districts where GOP inspectors were illegally removed. Next, he won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland. Well, he’s gotten another lucky break!

Mr. Obama won Wood County in Ohio this year. That’s right, Mr. Obama won the majority of Wood County’s 108% of registered voters. That’s not a typo.

In 2012, 106,258 people in Wood County are registered to vote out of an eligible 98,213. But it certainly must all be a coincidence, right?

Interesting theory. Another theory that I optimistically entertained was that the elites were using diversity to de-urbanize western countries, or at least to drive whites out of the city. One of the most emasculating influences for men is city-life.

[heartiste: just for the record, this blog is not purist. a large, prosperous nation can handle some diversity, on the order of 10-20%, without imploding, as long as policies based on lies aren’t the law of the land. this is in stark contrast to what we have now, where the productive majority is slipping into minority status and getting blamed for the problems of their displacers.]

The issue is the string of laws designed to “fix” a bunch of problems, some of which are imaginary.

One of the problems is that whenever a black person is rejected for a job or for, say, college admission, the employer or university is open for a lawsuit. The concept of “disproportional impact” falls heavily on the land.
.
Thor

thwack, what i would be in America is something closer to a white nationalist, but because of my Christian belief i wouldn’t be full WN, but would support something like CH said up to 20% minority,

Why can’t you be like those conservative blacks who point out as follows:

“For many black conservatives, the key mission is to bring repair and success to the Black community by applying the following fundamental principles:
(1)The pursuit of educational and professional excellence as a means of advancement within the society;
(2)Policies that promote safety and security in the community beyond the typical casting of a criminal as a “victim” of societal racism;
(3)Local economic development through free enterprise rather than looking to the federal government for assistance;
(4)Empowerment of the individual via self-improvement (virtue), conscience, and supernatural grace.[1]”

But instead waste social money on meds, and other stuff that you require, and is provided by whites. You know, noone is gonna fight for you if you don’t fight for yourself. If that means sacrificing part of your identity i would still go for it. So far you’we been in America what Jews were in Egypt. Don’t want to blend but don’t want to leave… They eventually left.

These would be super acceptable people to live with if they live by that. At least in my opinion since i’m not an American.

Nobody could be that stupid and still type, so I’ll assume you’re being the usual suspect disingenuous “keep asking questions to distract” useful idiot.

Greg

there are people who are so isolated from reality – because they get their information from very liberal sources – that they truly have never heard of such facts as,

blacks commiting about 80% of crimes in all large cities in the USA ( they are also doing most of the crimes in Canada and Europe )

Whites are being attacked and murdered by blacks 18 times more than whites attack blacks

despite the changes brought in 1960s to help the black community including changes to welfare laws, affirmative action and billions and billions of dollars injected to try and help blacks, they actually are doing worse; more crime, more murders, more drug use, more single mothers etc etc

I know some people with University degrees and high IQs who have never heard of those verifiable facts; they tell me those are stories made up by racist right wing people.

but no they are facts that can be verified at the CIA or CDC sites.

we are in the “age of information”, but we should call it the age of disinformation has most facts are actually concealed from the
populace.

most people know very little but have very strong opinions.

just another example, George Bush between 2000 and 2008 is the USA president who had the USA give the most financial help to Africa of all president in history.

No other president has sent more hundreds of millions of dollars to help poor and sick Africans, but I would bet 99% of the population has NEVER heard of this because the left and the main media concealed this ” expertly” as they always do.

most people are very ignorant – even if they are educated and have high IQs – especially when it comes to what is true about the political left and right.

Have you ever heard of finding a “noble cause” for covering actual interests? Civil war wasn’t because of black slaves solely, nor predominantly because of them, even if it was, it wasn’t them that initiated it, nor lobbying for it to happen.
Civil war indeed was a great catastrophe but its main reason isn’t slavery abolition, though it was so claimed. While i was younger i believed that main reason was that conflict over slaves, and even than it seemed to me as very stupid of your nation to go through all of that because some of you wanted free blacks… But i read a little bit about it, and voila! Offcourse you weren’t that stupid.
.

Affirmative action? A bad, and unproductive thing for sure, as it TURNED OUT! Your country has undertaken an experiment, just as any western country in the world has, and hasn’t maybe yet but soon will claim it to be a failure, as Germany already has claimed so for the dogma of multiculturalism.
It was started in the sixties because of the black votes. Is this their fault?
Put yourself in their skin, what did they souppouse to do? It is the job of the Whites to stop it or it is the job of the blacks to work their asses out to make up for the one that was more qualified than he is – that is – if the future of the nation is at their hearts, and if they would like to retain such a status. if not, whites should find a way to stop it, which they will i am assured, a soon as the water comes a little bit closer to the nose.
Still that thing isn’t producing historical mess that you claim it to be. Since seventies this has been going on and your bnp, and standard of life has risen, along with the technological advancement,
Overall situation got better for you, much better since before affirmative action(quality of life in the USA is something between Finland and Canada), so where is that historical mess you speak about – for the rest of the world is somehow hard to see.

En block voting? They are minority, every minority in the world if it feels endangered will do so(and a lot of times even if they don’t) so get used to it, and it won’t destroy your country, since whites will – when it will matter – vote republican to anull their racial bias, figuring blacks and other vote against their interests, and solely for the interests of the blacks.

White flight? We had the same problem in the Croatia, whence Croats left the rural areas where Serbs setteled on Croatian land, and later on it almost proved fatal for the indenpendence of Croatia, since these Serbs, cooperated with the Serbs from neighbouring Serbia, and held de facto control over parts of Croatia where they were majority, which allowed Serbian army form Serbia to operate freely from these croatian terittories, against Croatia. But other minorities like Hungarians, gypsies, Muslims, alike became ferocious allies of Croatian authority against Serbian aggressor. No minority turned against us, except Serbs.

In your circumstances Latino minority represents such a danger, since Mexico is your neighobouring country, and if in the next 50 – 100 years USA weakens or disintegrates, and Mexico becames even greater power than it is, it may wish to expand north not only economically, but also in a more direct way since Latinos there will be their extended hands. And if you treat other minorities like shit, they wouldn’t be eager to give you hand in these times, if not, they will rather align with you, than latino occupiers.
What i’m saying is that white fllight HASN’T so far proved to be a catastrohe, but has a(great?) potential to be exactly that, though not in the near future. While you said that it has already been a great catastrophe, and that is a B.S.
Only thing you can do to detter their natality, is your white natality, thus you can’t blaim minorities for their higher natality. It’s on you how to do it. Or you can do it like Croatia did. Fight a war, risk anihilation, and after you win the war expell them all that turned against you … but that is a “don’t try at home” type of demonstrations(unless there is no other way).
So again it isn’t a great catastrophe, yet. I have to give you credit for that, it may turn to a seccesion of American territory, or creation of indenpendent entities, in case of blacks. But not with present numbers where the most affected states have about 40% of white population, and fertility rates in Hispanics only 0,40% higher than white. Just close the borders for illegals and procreate little bit more, and your problem is solved, there would be white flight no more.

Urban decay? Problem for sure, but tighten the police surveilance, include them more in that local police force and continue to buy social peace, you’re at least containg it, and it won’t be such a problem of epic proportions.

Still i’ve noticed how Americans have some kind of the mechanism of premature fear, like all of the empires had and which made them so great. They acted out of fear and that made their actions very thorough. I think you manifest such traits right now, and they are to your benefit, but it lowers your quality of life, maybe considerably.
No need to call idiots people that don’t live in the USA for not seeing your problems as apocaliptic as you do, since your standard of living is between Finland and Canada. Guess that’s the main reason why you can’t mobilise the whites into pro – future camp, that requires tears, sweat, and blood.
For the rest of the world you are a policeman, and a living example of success, but also an ever living remainder of unavoidability of decadence that all of the empires experiance sooner or later.
Those that know a bit of your history, and admire your success(that is in every imaginable field of material life), are so confused, and sorry that you don’t hold to traditions that made you so great. Even my blood sometimes boils when i see how you proclaim PC, gender bullshit and the rest of the crap, to yourself and others, like these were the things that made you what you are today…

“a large, prosperous nation can handle some diversity, on the order of 10-20%, without imploding”

Some arab emirates have like 70-90% foreigners. But naturalization is rare. The foreigners may have extended rights or not, but the narratve always remains “YOU are not US”. The true message being “We will remain demographically strong, and you will have none or limited access to our women”.
Their frame is strong, too testosteroney but strong. They may very well collapse tomorrow and many arab nations are doomed because of dependency on natural resources, but it seems like most of them are holding on for a long time.

A lot longer than if they had applied our approach to diversity (“We’re self loathing and weak, and feel free to fuck our women”).

What we have is class warfare by way of racial genocide, there’s no way on earth you can realistically spin that into some sort of tough love. Get real, if it looks like genocide and it sponsors racist mass-murder, mass rape and ethnic cleansing like genocide, it must be genocide. This reminds me of the bitter quip from the Vietnam war – sometimes you have to destroy a village in order to save it. Course it should be said that our elite, like most perpetrators of genocide and mass murder, genuinely believe that they are doing good in doing so, just not the good you attribute to them. They want you to die, they don’t want to toughen you up. They don’t want you to come up at all. In the immortal words of Sgt. Glenn Ferguson “They’re not your friends, they’re not your buddies, they’re making you be punished.” They’re not your rivals, they’re not your mentors, they’re your war enemies.

The history of history is that of the wolves at the top consuming those below them. The iron law of history is if you won’t fight you’re going to be fucked. Fight, fuck, or draw small stores. Once the elite realized that the classes below them wouldn’t use violence to defend their rights, because of decadence caused by wealth, a fear of a centralized, technologically powerful state political police and all the rest of the mechanisms of social control the end was inevitable. The reality is that violence or the credible threat of violence are the only guarantor of the rights of the lower classes, bullshit about democracy and justice not withstanding. Even the mighty Emperor feared the Roman mob, our elite don’t fear us at all – not our votes, not our voices (squelched) and not our fists, and until that changes nothing will change.

Look at Brazil or any hispanic/latino country where whites are a minority. What do you almost always see?

The whites are usually the elite. The class system is obvious. If the person is white its a good chance they are also very wealthy. Skin color is a useful indicator of class status in those countries.

One could argue very easily that the elites in the US want to do the same, whether consciously or not. Hence the swarms of third worlders. But what do they gain from doing this? They get to run a country of low IQers that are very easily manipulated. Its the wet dream of many rulers to have their people follow their lead without question.

Your cultural eugenics theory comes into play where the best of the whites either rise up to the ranks of the elites or they die off with the rest of the white proles, due to lack of procreation or mixing.

The result– a class system based on race. Rich whites already see themselves as better than everyone else and it must hurt them to know there are people that look like them that are low class proles.

The practical use of this is simple. Barring the occurrence of a white revolution (which is unlikely to happen), you either rise up to their ranks or eventually have your lineage die off.

Man, so much privilege being white!!! Race-replacement, oss of habitat, thought control, threats of robbery, rape and murder, class warfare, marginalization, vice, high taxes, a lifetime of poverty and indebtedness, non-whites with a bizarre cargo cult persecution complex — so much privilege!

@Clash1e
” One could argue very easily that the elites in the US want to do the same, whether consciously or not.”.

Well, the whole thing sounds almost plausible. However, what makes me doubt this scenario is that the élite is likely to be creamed by the voting masses that want to redistribute the élite’s money and resources. Which brings on the question of how the system works in countries that are at least nominally democracies, such as Argentina, Brazil etc.

The White Lower class used to emulate the upper class, buying suits, buying family portraits, keeping tidy homes, wearing suits and respectable clothing, adopting good manners. In return the upper class would treat the lower class with [some] respect and occasionally let some of them in the upper class (through intermarriage and welcoming business/celebrity successes in).

Now the white lower class emulates the minorities (wiggers, rednecks, etc) and they are poorer for it.

And this is why niggers are so loud and obnoxious… being a black person in a system of white supremacy means all times are “uncertain times” so black people act accordinging; live life like a big carnival, get drunk and act like an animal….

Whiskey
Not All Calvinists are like that.
What would you say to a red haired, deeply southern guy who was descended partly from Hugegnot Aristocrats and partly from the lowest EuroScumRefugees that somehow tricked and scamed their way out of Ellis Island? From some angles I could be seen as a Red Neck. FRom others, not so much. Calvinism, as it sits on its deepest foundation, asserts that some of us are special in the eyes of God and that the only way to inhabit that truth is to so engage the challenges of this life in such a way that no one can continue to doubt your specialness.
IOWs, If you make Full Partner, that is good thing for your soul. Because if you fail to make partner that would be a huge sign that hell awaited you. One thing does not CAUSE the other, exactly, it just provides helpful hints about to expect in the after-life.

I am glad heartiste put up this post. I’ve gotten out of the habit of commenting in CH but will make an exception in this case.

For one, kind of an aside, but CH indicates elsewhere there are >1 writers that contribute to CH. I am doubtful the writer of the more recent Cultivate Your Dark Triad is the same writer as this piece. Confirmation or disconfirmation of my hunch is welcome but unnecessary.

But more to point: the reason I am glad CH wrote about this is it exposes a first principle, it exposes a first principle where CH is at odds of opinion with the ruling class, and it exposes a first principle where it is possible that CH is astoundingly wrong, so much so that this whole thing may be a metashittest to CH readers.

Basically it comes down like this. One thing that has long rattled me about rank and file GOP and the ethnic/racial GOPers is that they assume an association with / affiliation with the upper classes.

I find this odd because having grown up amongst the upper classes and still rubbing shoulders with them but not being one myself I can assure you all of something:

They feel no such affiliation with you

In fact, the completely bizarre thing about white people voting republican isn’t so much that they will sell you out, … they already have. You just haven’t figured that out yet.

But it isn’t on a race basis that they sold you out. That’s where we all differ on first principles.
The WRC doesn’t recognize the “W” or “white” part of it as being part of the organizing scheme. The WRC does credit you as a stupid fuck if you do, and sufficiently stupid to be written off.

To the WRC … or the RC, the question is one of class. End consideration.

Race has nothing to do with it, unless by confusing everyone including you that by being the same race as much of the RC that you assume the interests of the RC are your own and, like a useful idiot, you dillute unwanted attention from them onto the wider swath of nonapex whites. They have no problem with that.

@Dalton “Race has nothing to do with it, unless by confusing everyone including you that by being the same race as much of the RC that you assume the interests of the RC are your own and, like a useful idiot, you dillute unwanted attention from them onto the wider swath of nonapex whites. They have no problem with that.”

I once shared office with a black guy and we became fairly friendly.
One time, when it came up in conversation, I told him:
“Sure There is a ruling clique. And yes, they are almost all white”. But matching face color does not make me a member of the club any more than
you are a member of the club”. He accepted that. And there the matter stands.

The elites in the Americas are a foreign elite. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they need to be overthrown, just perhaps convinced that it is no longer in their interest to let people working and willing to work, die in the streets. That would be sufficient to render other problems solvable by the rest of the people among themselves.

He didn’t say the ruling class don’t see others as part of the nation, just that they don’t see the pale among you as part of or in the running to be a part of the ruling class.

“they don’t see the pale among you as part of or in the running to be a part of the rulling class”

Of course. They FEAR YOU.
An elite is only legitimised as long as the ones below them look up to the elite.
Otherwise, how can they be an elite?

Here in my country, due to the crisis, I see – and I’m not kidding or exagerating – I see the best, most competent, capable and civilised people of the whole wold leave because they can’t get a job.

We are exporting people just because the local elite DOES NOT WANT competition.

All across the West, it’s time to throw the elites away, or at least to give the power to the best of the middleclass who NEED, for the sake of our nations, to intermingle with the upper classes.

When we see David Cameron, Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel talking down about multiculturalism… it’s not sincere; They don’t give a shit… But they are fearful. They fear there are too many people who don’t recognise them as THEIR elite. So they try to appease them to pretend that everything is ok. It isn’t. It’s just a matter of time for all over the West (or at least here in Europe) to replace the upper class, like it is now being done in most Arab countries.

[…] The top and bottom against the middle. White status whoring with minority pawns. SWPL hypocrisy. Anti-white anti-racists. Two Americas. Jesusland. You’ve heard all these before. The Orwellian prognosis of a political culture steeped in a mountain of lies and suppressed crimethink. Astute observers of the American scene can’t help but notice that something foul is afoot, and they’ve given it a contour: the white ruling class has it in for the white working class. The WRC is working diligently to make life as difficult as possible for the WWC. The white elite are successfully putting their hate for “those other whites” into Source: Chateau Heartiste […]