Sunday, November 29, 2015

The French do not need to hear this. They are hurting and they are well aware now, of the terrible human tragedy that has just been visited upon them by the inhuman insanity of IslamoTerrorists. All the world except for the lunatic followers of Islam, feel for the people who are suffering the aftermath of that tragedy in Paris. All the world should understand that this is not an isolated attack – it is merely the point of a poison-tipped spear being wielded by this growing mob of deranged, blood-thirsty morons who live only to hate and kill. They are single-minded, sub-human time-bombs who cannot wait to commit indiscriminate mayhem on innocents or with any good luck, martyr themselves. They cannot be reasoned with, there are no receptors to accommodate logic or reason in their DNA. That’s called, ‘Stupid’ – and that science is settled.

Sadly, the French characteristic that is their oh-so-quirky national arrogance, had for generations, convinced them that they knew better – and they were not in the least concerned that their permissiveness with regard to the infiltration of militant Islamists could or would. ever get out of control. The French have had a very long history of strict domination of their colonies around the world so, why would they be concerned about losing control of their own homeland? That’s called, ‘arrogance’ and it is an extremely costly characteristic that seems to be endemic in the French culture. If they don’t know now just how costly it can be – then, there’s no hope whatsoever, for the future of France. That science too, is settled.

American citizens had better learn the lesson of France, Germany and all the other arrogant Europeans who are now reaping the results of their Liberalism and faux tolerance. Here in our own country, we have an embarrassingly large segment of our population that are similarly smitten with European arrogance - they refer to themselves as, ‘Progressives’ - we know them as, Democrats. Counter-acting this bunch but, not so much, is another embarrassingly large segment of so-called, ‘Establishment Republicans’ that is afflicted with the very same insanity.

What part of, “I TOLD YOU SO”and “WE WARNED YOU”do they not understand?

Thursday, November 26, 2015

You are a “heretic” if you are a person who disagrees with established beliefs or customs. It is commonly used to identify people who disagree with an organized religion. Those people are also sometimes called “deniers”.

In the case of “climate change” (a/k/a global warming), the people who challenge the theory of man-made global warming are called “deniers” just like the people who disavow the tenets of a particular religion. Therefore, some have determined that the advocates of global warming are really a religion cloaked in the feel-good term called “climate change”. If you disagree with their fanatical climate change theory, you become an “apostate” (definition: a person who forsakes his religion, cause, or party etc.) in that environmental religion.

Our present leaders, including President Obama and the vast majority of Democrats, are leading the charge in propagating and propagandizing the theory of man-made global warming, and Obama has even called it one of the greatest threats to civilization, not Islamic terrorism, but man-made global warming. The upcoming world wide climate conference to be held in Europe will be the showcase for all the misguided countries and leaders who have fallen for this unscientific theory. Science is never settled, even if Al Gore decrees it.

The theory of man-made global warming is not only a form of a religion, it is also a political weapon. In a recent issue of Newsweek, the cover story was entitled “Global Warming is a Hoax”. But, contrary to the cover headline, the following story in the article was was a pro-global warming piece that tried to discredit the “deniers”. There can and should be pointed out that thousands of researchers, scientists, and scholars have weighed in on the side of truth, and even professional mathematicians have joined the “deniers” by stating that there hasn't been any appreciable global warming during the past 18 years. We have reached the point where any person of intelligence can see through the “LIE” that most scientists agree that anthropomorphic global warming is real.

The question we should always ask ourselves as to why some scientists still support the hoax is that they are almost all entirely employed by governments or by institutions that depend on government funding. That is, by itself, is a dead give-away that there is something very political about this whole thing bordering on a religious aspect. The old saying, “follow the money” certainly applies in this case.

The “environmental wacko's” use the tactics of “doom and gloom” to frighten us into thinking that our planet, our way of life, our very survival is being threatened by an excess amount of CO2 in our atmosphere caused by the burning of fossil fuels. These fanatics never mention the fact that CO2 is a plant and tree food or that living people exhale CO2 every time we breathe out. Also, they never mention that the greatest “pollutant” in our atmosphere is actually water vapor. Of course, they wouldn't mention that as it would undermine their livelihoods and in having grant money dry up to continue their vendetta against our capitalistic free enterprise system, which successful countries, like the U.S.A., live under.

Some of the prominent “heretics and deniers” of man-made global warming include, Dr Richard Lindzen, meteorologist and Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology and climatology at M.I.T.; Dr. Timothy Ball, former meteorology professor at the Univ. of Winnipeg; and John Coleman, meteorologist and founder of the Weather Channel, who has called man-made global warming “the biggest scientific scam in history”. They all pooh-pooh the so-called flawed data of the U.N. sponsored I.P.C.C., who were caught “cooking the books” a few years back in order to prove the bogus theory of man-made theory of global warming.

So yes, myself and many others can erroneously be considered “heretics” (and deniers) (with pride), not against formal religions, but against the religion of man-made global warming.

Sunday, November 22, 2015

To the many gullible souls out there who truly think that Barack Obama is "legacy building" in his all-out assault on America, I implore you to bow out of the conversation because you are not seeing clearly.

The term legacy carries positive connotations of something bequeath that is to the receiver's benefit. Everything that Barack Obama does is calculated to destroy America, which he despises. This man no more cares about legacy than he fears being properly prosecuted by the white political leaders whose responsibility it is to remove him from office.

I focus on white leaders, because whites are still in the majority and they fill the majority of political offices. If the majority of political operatives were of some other ethnicity, I would lodge my complaint against that group. Ethnicity is an issue only because Obama is half-black and he uses that fact to intimidate guilt-conflicted white people. Otherwise, he would have been impeached and likely in prison for treason by now.

Barack Obama's sole aim has been, since he first entered politics and continues as he winds down this presidency, the complete destruction of America as it was founded.

It is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans who must listen to elitist pundits on Fox news and elsewhere, and political drones in either party endeavor to make Obama's behavior fit a pattern of normalcy. Attributing his destructive policies to "legacy building" is either self-delusion on the part of the people who make that claim or cowardliness.

This is my take.

Obama's nuclear deal with Iran has nothing to do with legacy but rather to enable a Muslim nation to wage nuclear war with America and Israel – the two nations that he most despises. Does anyone wonder why Russians praise Vladimir Putin despite what the rest of the world might think of him? Putin cares about his country, that's why.

Obama despises the American military because traditionally it has been a mainstay of America's strength, and our strength infuriates him.

Imposition of a polluting homosexual, anti-Christian agenda upon the military ranks destroys unit cohesion and literally terrorizes male members with the prospect of sodomy rape. Such rapes have increased since the forcing of open homosexuality in the ranks, against the will of a majority of members I might add. Couple that with an infiltration of women, for whom all standards of strength must be reduced, and Obama attains his goal of emasculating and demoralizing the forces.

He could not care less about a legacy of making the forces more diverse. Besides, President Truman diversified the military as much as it should be when he integrated it. Obama's objective is its destruction.

Thursday, November 19, 2015

For years, Republicans (a/k/a conservatives) have been complaining about a biased media that overwhelmingly seems to support Democrats (a/k/a liberals), with just a few exceptions. Fair minded people are well aware of the bias, but if they complained, they would then be scorned and be accused of whining by the very same media they were railing against. So, many conservatives would and have put their tail between their legs, in the past, and stifled their views on the obvious injustice of living with a biased media.

Just recently, during one of the Republican debates, this bias was shown, in all its glory, as the moderators of this debate (NBC personnel and commentators) used questioning techniques that wasn't trying to elicit meaningful information, but to arrogantly try to put the candidates being questioned on the defensive, and in some cases attempt to have them go after their opponents in a negative way. Their attempt backfired this time, as the candidates didn't fall for the bait and actually rebuffed the moderator's for their arrogant type of questioning, much to the delight of the audience who could see what the moderator's were trying to do. Boos could be heard on several occasions from the audience as the moderators tried to offer their inflammatory questions to the candidates. These moderators, representing CNBC (representing a notorious liberal network, under the aegis of NBC), could and should be classified as DEMOCRATS DISGUISED AS JOURNALISTS.

The attempt by NBC to get the candidates off message and to attack each other, sort of backfired on them as even some of the liberal pundits, like Carl Bernstein, called their behavior a disgrace. Of course, other liberal pundits, like Chris Matthews, sided with the conduct of the moderators and criticized the candidates for complaining. Imagine if they did that at a Democrat debate?

During the Republican debate, Sen. Marco Rubio made a very profound statement that the “main stream media” was the Super Pac of the Democrat Party. The audience erupted in applause, as it was quite obviously a valid statement by Marco Rubio. In addition, Sen. Ted Cruz also chimed in to more applause as to his observations as to the “modus operandi” of the moderator's questions to the candidates as being hostile and irrelevant (Mike Huckabee and Chris Christie also called out the moderators for their rude and biased questions). You could say that these rebukes by the candidates sort of toned down the hostile questions for the rest of the debate.

If you contrasted the Republican debate with the Democrat debate, it was like night and day. Very few hostile questions, if any, were asked of the Democrat candidates as it seemed the moderators were throwing “softball” questions at the Democrat candidates, while it was open season on the negative, inciting questions posed to the Republicans.

Of course, it is not just the cable and broadcast networks which exude this liberal bias, the print media is also complicit in this attempt to marginalize the Republicans and to brace up the Democrats.

Here in So. Florida, the 3 major newspapers are practically “in the tank” for the Democrats and with an obvious liberal progressive point of view. It seems that the Republicans can do nothing right and the Democrats can do no wrong. Every once in awhile they do print a positive story on the Republicans, but it seems like an after thought as they are probably trying to ease their guilty conscience. Fair and balanced is a term that seems to be forgotten by these purveyors of liberal bias. It will not get any better in the future as the journalism schools are turning out more liberal replacements for the liberal journalists who retire and die off. It seems that we are left with a “Hopson's Choice” (which is really no choice) and will just have to suffer with this blatant bias from now on into the future.

So, as to the headline, it is obvious from everything I mentioned in this editorial, that the vast majority of the media are really, DEMOCRATS DISGUISED AS JOURNALISTS.

Sunday, November 15, 2015

What transpired in Paris on Friday is the ramification caused
by the buffoon in the oval office, due to his only strategy
ever set forth; evacuating our troops from Iraq, leaving the
whole area open to Islamic jihadists to create havoc that is
reaching far beyond the middle east.

Even in his statement to the world, he still purported ISIS
is contained. I would be open to know what his interpretation
of containment is. Everyone knew what would happen after the
withdrawal from Iraq, except him. And even after he was briefed
about ISIS in Syria, and on the move, he ignored military advice
to nip them in the bud with air power, while they were in the
open, but he waited until they became well formed and established
in key areas before he was forced to do it, even when the
timeline has become ineffectual.

It is apparent to others that he doesn't know what he is doing,
opening the door to Vladimir Putin and friendly nations to us,
looking for leadership elsewhere.

To the PCP, buffoon is politically correct to describe an ineffectual
individual.

Thursday, November 12, 2015

And then in the weekend's newspaper one of the political cartoonist drew a picture of Dr. Carson in a Burger King whopper outfit. It brought home to me how the media has a double standard. Two incidents - which were not proved untrue - that took place 35 to 50 years ago becomes relevant because Dr. Carson is a black, conservative Republican. But let's take a look at just some of the whoppers told by Mrs. Clinton over the years. And yet the main stream media continues to give her a pass. Here are just a few of the Clinton lies.

Mrs. Clinton claimed that her daughter Chelsea was jogging around the world during 9/11 when it turned out she was safe at home.

She claimed that she was "under fire" with bullets flying everywhere when she landed in Bosnia. However, the pilot said there were no bullets anywhere and they would not have departed if there was any danger. In fact, a little girl presented her with flowers after she landed.

She claimed she never said the riots in Benghazi were caused by a political cartoon of Mohammad despite numerous videos contradicting her.

She claimed she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary after he climbed Mt. Everest - but she was 6 years old when that happened.

She claimed it was by reading the Wall St. Journal that she, on her own, turned $1,000 into a $100,000 profit on her one and only foray in the cattle futures market. However, the WSJ did not cover that market at the time.

She claimed she never received a subpoena concerning her emails and server although the House Committee produced the subpoena.

She claimed all of her grandparents immigrated to the U.S. However, only one did.

She claimed that she and her husband were dead broke when they left the White House. And yet below is a photo of the house they were able to purchase. Most of us couldn't afford the taxes on such a house.

When she was a lawyer in the Rose law firm she did work for Castle Grande, which turned out to be a fraudulent venture. She claimed she never worked on the project despite the law firm billing records showing she spent at least 30 hours on the project.

I could give many more examples. The question I ask is: when will the main stream media discuss Mrs. Clinton's lies?

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Balack Hussein Obama’s years of indoctrination in all things Islam, his exposure to radical, anti-American Socialistic hate mongering plus, an inordinately large dose of his Father’s obsession with anti-Colonialism – all these off-the-wall influences have combined to provide him with an outsized quotient of arrogance. He stands alone in his uncanny ignorance that manifests itself whenever he delves into the nether world of micro-managing the military might of the U. S. Armed Forces.

President & Commander-in-Chief: He is so taken with these titles that he is quite comfortable mucking up our military, making irrational decisions about Rules of Engagement policies and other inane strategies that are doomed-to-failure, all in the face of sound advice to the contrary from seasoned Generals with only their decades of directly-related combat experience to support their recommendations.

Obama has never served a single day in a uniform of our Armed Forces and so, his aimless thrashing about in deadly serious military matters is an obscenity. He is so obsessed with his own perceived Pope-like infallibility, that he can equate his time spent honing the corruptive skills of Community Organizing thuggery on the crime-ridden streets of Chicago, with the combined wisdom and combat experience of four-star Generals and Admirals. And so, these top military advisors, each of whom has spent decades at training and leading our all-volunteer military in successful combat against enemy forces, have been shunted aside without a second thought by this self-centered, narcissistic demon who wallows in total denial of his gross inadequacies.

Thursday, November 5, 2015

Detroit, Buffalo, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Miami, St. Louis, El Paso, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, Newark, are the top 10 poorest cities in America, and the thread that binds all of them is that they are all run by DEMOCRATS . That's right, DEMOCRATS. Why is that? Let's take a look.

Almost all have a large amount of city employees with elaborate benefits and pensions for its retirees (the cost of which is bringing most of these cities to the brink of bankruptcy, if not already, in the case of Detroit). In order for these city politicians to get elected in these cities, the Democrat politicians offer very generous payouts to these employees thereby making the cities budgets unable to control costs. As a result of their mismanagement, many of the productive tax-paying residents have moved out to greener pastures, thus leaving behind the low producing residents who rely on the largess of government “goodies” for their survival, being supported by lower tax revenues.

Take the City of Detroit, at one time it was one of the richest cities in the country (it was the auto capital of the world) with over a million and a half residents. Today, many parts of the city look like Dresden, Germany (the bombed out city of Germany from World War II), and the population is now around 700,000 residents with a good percentage of them being poor. In addition, a few of the former Mayors are now doing jail time. All were DEMOCRATS, but the residents still vote for the Democrat candidate come election time. Einstein once said, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”. You could say that Detroiters deserve what they voted for because they voted for these incompetent and felonious politicians, against common sense.

Besides the loss of tax revenue, because of the citizen flight out of these cities, the schools in these cities are graduating many functional illiterates, because the teacher's unions resist any reforms to improve the educational environment, and they get their power from the feckless politicians whom they endorse and work for during elections. The teachers vote between 80% and 90% for Democrats and contribute most all their political funds to Democrats, thereby expecting the politicians to do their bidding, and they do, when it comes to teacher's benefits along with “juicy” benefits to other municipal employees who also vote mostly Democrat. These “goodies” from the public treasury are causing some of the massive deficits in most of these cities.

Another factor which causes the outflow of tax-paying residents, is the high crime rates caused by a lack of police enforcement under the direction of the Mayor's and City Council members not backing up the police and law enforcement officials. The police are under siege today by radical anarchy groups that profess misinformation and misleading facts as truth, and a compliant media pushing their radical agenda. The bias in the media is quite evident and obvious.

A phenomenon in over 300 cities is the total disregard to law and order, especially in those cities that designate themselves as “sanctuary cites”. Illegal alien criminals flock to these cities knowing that they will not be arrested for their crimes, but in fact, will be sheltered from ICE and not be arrested as criminals or illegal aliens. The Democrats are the one's mainly behind this flouting of the law as the liberal politicians want to get the votes of Hispanics, and the hell with law abiding citizens who are paying the freight with their taxes.

So yes, it is very obvious that these poor cities, mentioned earlier, are on a downward spiral and unless they throw out their leaders (all Democrats and a smattering group of Republicans) they will continue being poor and dependent The answer is, THROW THE RASCALS OUT, regardless of party affiliation!

Sunday, November 1, 2015

I do not comprehend this religion called Islam. From the effect
it is having on the world, I view it as a movement that was
conceived by a war lord born to violence and overseen by
psychopaths, divided in two factions in its concept, with no
regard for human life, especially women. Except for its very
few, there has been no outcry by other Muslims to condemn
the violence and terror attached to this religion. Especially in
our country.

Our Constitution is designed against a caliphate type institution
that would allow sharia law to exist. Where man and woman
walk side by side with each other instead of paces apart. Where
sharia Islam and democracy can never co-exist in harmony.
And many sharia abominate tenets are incompatible with Judeo-
Christian dogma. Doing a computer search of "The Key Tenets
of Sharia" will reveal some of these abominations.

Care must be taken in choosing our next leader carefully, to be
sure he or she will uphold the Constitution and not try to manipulate
or ignore what it stands for, and not fear that those who swore to
destroy us will be offended. We must win the battle of political
correctness against us from within, if we are to gain victory against
our adversaries and maintain our freedoms.

Conservative column from George Giftos

Muslims Want Sharia Law in Non-Muslim Countries with Robert Spencer on The Sean Hannity Show

Muslim Americans, even the ones born in USA wanted Sharia Law in USA, it's the same for Muslims all around the world, wanted Islam in non- Muslim countries.

Build The Wall

BLACK LIVES MATTER KILLS PEOPLE

Bill Whittle provides shocking evidence that demolishes the Big Lie of Black Lives Matter and then goes on to explain why a lie that size needs to be told by people like Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama & Loretta Lynch.

Read Numerous Quotes by Wright

Yeah but Trump said?

Obama leaves the world a more dangerous place

A Democrat Leader

Thomas Sowell Quote

Hillary Clinton lying for 13 minutes straight

The Untold Story of Muslim Opinions & Demographics

By the Numbers is an honest and open discussion about Muslim opinions and demographics. Narrated by Raheel Raza, president of Muslims Facing Tomorrow, this short film is about the acceptance that radical Islam is a bigger problem than most politically correct governments and individuals are ready to admit. Is ISIS, the Islamic State, trying to penetrate the U.S. with the refugee influx? Are Muslims radicalized on U.S. soil? Are organizations such as CAIR, who purport to represent American Muslims accepting and liberal or radicalized with links to terror organizations?

For a complete history of Chuck’s Editorials please look below the “LABELS” title and click on “Chuck Editorial”

Labels

Great Editorials by IBD

Example of why we need Term Limits

Followers

What have we learned in 2,064 years?

"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."- Cicero - 55 BC

Evidently, nothing.

TERM LIMITS

Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison.
Illinois Already Does This.
Submitted by Fred Page