Monica: section 2.10 in primer,
inlining of WSDL, comment on absence of assertions, applies to
other than WSDL, move further up in primer document
... we suggest to move into section 2.6, may fit in other
places

Asir: talking about absence of
policy assertions, moving also part about absence of policy
expressions
... do you want to move both?
... make distinction clear in primer of absence of assertions
vs absence of policy expressions

Maryann: restrictions once you
have assertions in vocabulary, do we need to make a comment as
well?

Paul: Asir says text in 4.7 is
more generic, does not only apply to WSDL

Dan: other statement in 4.6
... and best practice in 4.6

Maryann: helps in having a
pointer, would we need a more general statement not specific to
WSDL?
... Statement in 4.6 lead-in to 4.7

Umit: original proposal was on
section that explains aspects of policy assertion, tries to
list all relevant points there
... suggest if Dan has problem with prior sentence, can give
pointers to 4.6 and 4.7 otherwise

Dan: previous statement can
stay

<PaulC> Counter proposal
1:

<PaulC> Counter proposal
1:

<PaulC> Leave the following
text:

<PaulC> The number of
different subjects to which an assertion can be attached is
also a factor when defining an assertion.

<PaulC> And follow it with a
pointer to subsequent material.

<cferris> in section 4.7

<PaulC> And remove the next
sentence: "Determining the appropriate policy subjects ...
dynamically".