Wednesday, 7 December 2016

The Prime Minister is going to publish a Brexit plan, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38224169

Surely nobody tells you their plan when they enter negotiations? Well this is what I've been hearing. However I've always wanted to hear the plan especially when I had a vote in the referendum. Should I vote to stay in or leave? Maybe I'll find out soon! :-)

Monday, 31 August 2015

The BBC's headline is 'Labour leadership: Corbyn under fire for Bin Laden comments'. So what are these dreadful comments that would cause such criticism? Well Jeremy says it was a "tragedy" that Osama Bin Laden was killed rather than being put on trial. What's wrong with that? It was a tragedy.

I wrote about why Bin Laden should have been taken alive here and here. It made perfect sense at the time and still does.

Wednesday, 26 August 2015

Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union, has had his vote rejected for the Labour leadership contest. He has publicly claimed that he voted Green in 2010 but should that stop him changing your mind? The Labour Party are right to limit voting to supporters but how do they explain this ban? They've also banned other prominent individuals like Jeremy Hardy and Mark Steel. I don't know if these comedians are proven enemies of the Labour Party or whether Labour is trying to rig the election but I get the impression it is the latter.

If there are malevolent individuals who wish to join the Labour Party in order to vote for the person whom they feel would make the worst leader, then this is clearly wrong and has no place in British politics or British society. Anyone who tells you it is just a bit of fun is wrong too.

It is also wrong to exclude voters who are genuine members of the Labour Party and wish to see it do well. However my main concern isn't about the exclusion from voting. It is about the exclusion from membership. Why have I heard everything about thousands of votes being rejected and nothing about thousands of cancelled memberships?

Friday, 17 April 2015

I shared a video on
Facebook yesterday. It was a video of Ed Miliband repeating himself rather than
listen to the questions from an interviewer. I would have left it there but I
got a comment that the reason why poor Ed had to repeat himself was because of
bad interviewing typical of right wing media.

I am saddened by this
video. W.S. Gilbert told us over a century ago that politicians leave their
brains outside the House of Commons. It's still going on.

The reply:

Interviewers ask questions
but don't listen to the answers. This is typical of the right wing media. Hence
poor Ed having to repeat himself. There has been reckless and provocative
government action but the interviewer still doesn't get it!

And my reply:

The first question was
about Ed's leadership. The second was about the Tory Party's private and public
image. Ed almost answered the third question about whether he has spoken
privately with union leaders but then goes on to repeat himself. The fourth
question is whether Ed, as a parent has been personally affected and again Ed
almost answers the question before repeating himself. I remain saddened and it
is Ed who should put aside the rhetoric.

This video is from 2011
and maybe the most surprising aspect is that I haven't seen it before. How did
this ignorance and repetition not make headlines? I don't think Ed will have
improved with age. In fact he is being backed by his supporters even now. They
will say that the tape is obviously fake. Well here is the original BBC video.

It looks like we live in a
world in which a potential prime minister can act like a broken record and
nobody notices.

Monday, 13 April 2015

The election campaign has started and leaflets are being delivered, mostly by the post office. So if you get more than one leaflet from a party then the chances are that they have used their free delivery service and they have gone on to pay a lot of money to get their message over to you twice.

There is another way that you can hear about the views of your candidates and that's at a hustings meeting. No individual party can organise this as all the others would refuse to attend. Often these meetings are organised by Churches Together and unlike the TV debates you usually only get one chance to listen to local candidates.

If you live in Morecambe and Lunesdale then your chance is at More Music in Morecambe from 7pm on Tuesday 14th April. I'll be there and so will many of the party faithful of all the candidates. That's the trouble. These hustings don't reach out to the electorate. In fact the sitting MP didn't attend in 2010 probably because there must be a feeling that there are no votes in it.

It is worth attending the hustings meeting as however important this meeting is to the candidates it is the only chance that the electorate gets to see through the party propaganda and let's them make their own mind up.

Thursday, 5 March 2015

I've just seen Jonny Evans from Manchester United and Papiss Cisse from Newcastle try to foul each other a few times. I didn't see much of the football. Oh yes and they spat at each other. Louis Van Gall, the Manchester United manager was reported to have said that his player should not be found guilty. On the BBC website he is reported as saying "I don't think Jonny Evans is a spitter. Maybe spitting on the floor, but we were on the bench and you cannot see from there." It's a nonsense quote based on ignorance. Sounds like poor management to me but Lous gets paid a lot for this nonsense.

The reason for this post is not Manchester United's poor management. It's not even the spitting - thank goodness we still have some lines that can't be crossed. The reason is not even that we have two players trying to foul each other and nobody mentions that they are doing anything wrong. The reason is that we continually hear that football players are role models. No they aren't.

Change the world

P.S. Jonny comes out fighting. He would never spit at an opponent. It is possible that he has seen the evidence and chooses to ignore it. This makes him (....) fill in your favourite word. Alternatively he did spit at an opponent and this make him (....) fill in your favourite word. Regardless of whether he has any idea of what he has done ignorance is not a defence in law and you don't need a judge to find him guilty of ignorance.

P.P.S. It's the same day and later reports use the word 'deliberately'. It doesn't matter Jonny. It certainly didn't matter to Papiss.