__________________I gots one of them high powered gaming computers with an EVGA GTX 480 video thingy and a Q9550 processing device and also one of them Windows 7 64 operating programs with 4GB of some Corsair 1033 DDR2 ram.

__________________I gots one of them high powered gaming computers with an EVGA GTX 480 video thingy and a Q9550 processing device and also one of them Windows 7 64 operating programs with 4GB of some Corsair 1033 DDR2 ram.

It's rare to see a game that looks so crisp and runs so smoothly on a console, but that's exactly what id Software seems to have accomplished with Rage. It's the studio's first big budget release since Doom 3, and id's commitment to giving gamers a stunning visual experience is apparent. Dusty valleys choked with weeds and crisscrossing rock ridges make the environments seem natural and realistic, and despite the impressive draw distance that lets you see far down arid valleys there's no framerate hitching.

Nice with 60fps and if they can make it look fairly good, even better.

Well... I think probably none of us have seen either crysis 2 or RAGE in person running on the consoles to say what's what but it's nice to know that the developers are actually getting this quality of graphics out of consoles. I think GOW3 was the first major breakthrough as far as console graphics go.

Killzone was nice, Halo reach looks impressive, red dead looked good as well as uncharted 2, etc.. it's just nice to see that the consoles, despite the immeditate negative attitude towards them, aren't the graphical slouches that they've come to be seen as.

Oh and then there's gran tourismo 5 which also looked unreal.

the main thing I'm hoping that we get out of rage though is a good game rather than just a tech demo of the engine that will later be applied to better games. So far that's what we've seen from both carmack and cliffyB.