Former New England Patriots Star Aaron Hernandez Found Not Guilty in 2012 Double Murder

Share this:

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Aaron Hernandez sits in the courtroom of the Attleboro District Court during his hearing on August 22, 2013 in North Attleboro, Massachusetts. (CREDIT: Jared Wickerham/Getty Images)

Former New England Patriots Star Aaron Hernandez Found Not Guilty in 2012 Double Murder

Aaron Hernandez sits in the courtroom of the Attleboro District Court during his hearing on August 22, 2013 in North Attleboro, Massachusetts. (CREDIT: Jared Wickerham/Getty Images)

Aaron Hernandez was found not guilty of two counts of murder on Friday in the killing of two men in a drive-by shooting outside a Boston nightclub in July 2012.

Aaron Hernandez sits in the courtroom of the Attleboro District Court during his hearing on August 22, 2013 in North Attleboro, Massachusetts. (CREDIT: Jared Wickerham/Getty Images)

The former NFL star faced eight counts in all, including two of murder and three of armed assault. He also faced a charge of witness intimidation for allegedly shooting his former friend in the face in an attempt to silence him.

Hernandez was found guilty of just one count: illegal possession of a firearm.

A visibly emotional Hernandez teared up and embraced his attorneys as the verdict was read. His defense attorney said he was “delighted” and that Hernandez was “relieved” about the verdict.

“He was charged for something somebody else did, and that is a weighty burden for anyone to shoulder,” defense attorney Ronald Sullivan said.

Hernandez’s promising football career as a tight end with the New England Patriots fell apart in June 2013 when he was arrested in the murder of Odin Lloyd, the boyfriend of his fiancée’s sister. Hernandez was found guilty and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole in 2015, though he has appealed for a new trial in that case.

Prosecutors in this trial said Hernandez shot and killed Safiro Furtado and Daniel de Abreu outside a nightclub. But defense attorneys said the prosecution’s key witness, Alexander Bradley, was the true killer.

Jurors, who began deliberations last Friday, were instructed not to consider Hernandez’s prior conviction. Hernandez did not testify in either trial.

Despite Hernandez’s prior life sentence, legal experts said this double-murder trial still mattered for him personally — and for the justice system.

The evidence

The prosecution’s case was light on forensics, and relied heavily on testimony from Bradley, who said he was with Hernandez during the fatal shooting.

Bradley, who received immunity to testify, said that Hernandez became angry one night out when a man bumped into him at a nightclub and spilled his drink. Later that night, Hernandez ordered Bradley to drive up next to that man’s packed vehicle at a stop light.

“Yo,” Hernandez said out of the window, according to Bradley. “What’s up now, n*****?”

Hernandez leaned across Bradley and fired five shots into the other car, Bradley testified. Two immigrants from Cape Verde, Safiro Furtado and Daniel de Abreu, were killed.

In closing statements, prosecutors presented Hernandez as a cold-blooded killer who committed an act of “senseless violence” by firing into a packed car.

“That killer took pleasure in what he did that night,” Patrick Haggan, the lead prosecutor in the case, said. “He wanted his victims to see it coming.”

After the shooting, Bradley sped away from the scene and he and Hernandez agreed to keep their mouths shut about the killings, Bradley said.

Investigators had few leads and the case went cold. A month later, Hernandez signed a $40 million contract extension with the New England Patriots.

Bradley and Hernandez remained close friends until a violent falling out months later at a party in Florida. Hernandez had become extremely paranoid, Bradley testified, and he began to believe that Bradley could not keep the shooting a secret.

After a night out in February 2013, Hernandez shot Bradley between the eyes and left him in a parking lot to die, Bradley testified. Bradley survived but lost his right eye, and he vowed revenge on his former friend, he said.

Bradley’s credibility

Bradley’s credibility — or lack thereof — played a major role in the trial. Defense attorney Jose Baez repeatedly called him a liar and a violent criminal who had made up the story to protect himself. Baez mockingly called Bradley’s immunity agreement the “deal of the century.”

“This guy has an incentive, and all of this is lies,” Baez said in closing statements.

On the stand, Bradley admitted to a long history of sometimes-violent drug dealing over more than a decade. He is currently imprisoned for shooting up a club in Hartford, Connecticut, in an unrelated incident.

Prosecutors presented some evidence that contradicted parts of Bradley’s testimony. However, they argued that those “minor inconsistencies” proved Bradley told what he believed to be the truth, rather than a version of events put together by prosecutors or police.

Bradley, prosecutors argued, brought the story together but was not the only evidence in the case.

Investigators found the “murder car,” a silver Toyota 4Runner with Rhode Island plates, hidden away at Hernandez’s cousin’s home. The “murder weapon” was found on a person connected to Hernandez as well, prosecutors said, and cell phone experts said Hernandez’s phone was nearby at the time of the shooting.

Finally, prosecutors pointed to Hernandez’s tattoos as confessions of the crimes. One of his tattoos was a gun similar to the murder weapon with exactly five bullets, the same number as were fired in the 2012 shooting.

Another tattoo was a head-on view of a gun, similar to what Bradley would have seen before he was shot. Next to both of those tattoos was a scrawl of text reading “God forgives.”

“That is not random. That is not art. That is evidence,” Haggan said. “That is a confession.”