In social action theory (SAT), an ecological analysis of goal oriented endeavors identifies two important casual pathways by which human environments may foster self-debilitating habits. The theory also specifies a more hopeful pathway by which people in stressful environments can build resilience and achieve greater control over their health.
In the light of the above statement, describe a situation in your life where you have made use of agonistic striving (AS); dissipated striving (DS); and transcendence striving (TS) to get rid of an unhealthy behavior (Unhealthy eating) and hence promote healthy living for yourself. **Was your goal-oriented behavior, that is, health promotion, easy to achieve for you? It *What advice would you give to someone who may want to follow your foot path? It **What are the strengths and limitations of the SAT from your experience?

Sample Solution

Cesare Lombroso's (1960) Criminal Man prompted another train in criminology, putting a connection between physical inconsistencies and wrongdoing. Certain credits were said to be the consequence of an organically mediocre nearness which prompted an existence of wrongdoing (Ellwood, 1912). An observational examination translated various 'mugshots' made up of culprits and Psychology staff from Canterbury Christ Church University. Autonomous t-tests uncovered that there was no distinction between the two gatherings as far as physical attributes and 'criminal' rating. These discoveries tie in with past research in the field (Goring, 1972; Saladin, Zalman and Breen 1988). Looking at THE PREVALENCE OF 'CRIMINAL TRAITS' BETWEEN CONVICTED CRIMINALS AND PSYCHOLOGY STAFF Cesare Lombroso (2006) is best known as the originator of the teach criminal human studies; the investigation of mental and physical characteristics related with the 'conceived criminal'. Lombroso distributed Criminal Man (2006), a well known investigation in which he ascribed criminal conduct to 'Atavism', an acquired condition in which guilty party's shown developmental returns to more crude people. As per Lombroso (2006) the criminal was on a very basic level a living irregularity worried about neurotic and atavistic qualities (Ellwood, 1912). In the wake of considering 66 expired culprits, Lombroso (2006) gathered a rundown of physical highlights thought to be related with criminal conduct. Attributes included unbalanced countenances and over the top body hair. A man was believed to be a criminal on the off chance that they prepared at least 4 qualities. Charles B. Gutting (1972) subjected 37 of Lombroso's (2006) qualities to experimental testing and contrasted 2,348 London convicts and a control gathering of youthful Englishmen. Gutting (1972) discovered little help for Lombroso's work, rather proposing criminal conduct is essentially an acquired absence of presence of mind. Support for Lombroso originates from an investigation by Hooton (1939), in which 13,873 male detainees were contrasted and 3,023 guys from a general example. Hooton ascribed criminal conduct to natural inadequacy, allotting various highlights, for example, inclining brows to culprits. Hooton was, in any case, condemned for his roundabout thinking. Offenders were thought to be physically average and those highlights which recognized culprits from others could be named forerunners of natural inadequacy. Just few current examinations have tried the relationship among appeal and criminal conduct. Saladin, Zalman and Breen (1988) welcomed understudies to judge the physical engaging quality of a choice of male photographs. Different understudies evaluated the same photographs and judged the probability that those envisioned would perpetrate a wrongdoing. Those appraised as less alluring will probably carry out wrongdoing. Comparative outcomes were likewise found in other related investigations (Cavior and Howard, 1973; Kurtzberg, 1978). The present examination is expanding upon the past conflicting proof, and much like Goring (1913), the investigation will center after looking at Lombroso's (2006) unique inconsistencies inside the criminal and all inclusive community. Because of past confirmation my speculation expresses that there will be no contrast between Lombroso's (2006) 'criminal characteristics' among indicted crooks and the overall public. Technique Outline The outline of the analysis comprised of autonomous measures as the two gatherings were separate from each other. Members There were 30 members altogether, 15 were Psychology staff individuals from Canterbury Christ Church University and the other 15 were indicted hoodlums. Materials and Apparatus Materials required for the analysis incorporated the 15 criminal mugshots, 15 staff mugshots lastly a criminal attributes coding sheet. Strategy The strategy included experiencing every photograph and choosing whether every individual had Lombroso's (2006) unique 'criminal attributes'. These qualities comprised of: hilter kilter head, straightened/wound nose, extensive ears, fat lips, gigantic jaw, high cheekbones, restricted eyes and unnecessary skin wrinkles. Every photograph was judged upon these criteria and whether they were available or not. The last part included choosing whether every individual was a criminal or not which depended on Lombroso's (2006) thoughts that on the off chance that you saw in excess of four attributes then you were a criminal. Regarding moral contemplations the utilization of photographs from the staff individuals would have required assent and also the privilege to pull back from the examination anytime. Results General frequencies for the 'criminal attributes' recognized in the two arrangements of photographs are given in Table 1. This information uncovers that as far as the 'non-symmetrical face' and 'contorted nose' attributes these were set apart as being available in the staff photographs (4 and 8 time separately) more so than for the criminal photographs in which they were accounted for 2 and 6 times. The various characteristics were distinguished more on the criminal photographs anyway 'tremendous jaw' and 'high cheekbones' were similarly coded for at 7 and 9 times. Table 2 gives information demonstrating the frequencies of the aggregate quantities of 'criminal qualities' coded for in each gathering of photographs. The two gatherings get more aggregate evaluations amidst the scale, with the greater part coded for 2 or 3 criminal attributes. An autonomous t test yielded t(28) = .756, p > .05. The speculation was acknowledged: there was no distinction between the criminal order of 'staff mug shots' and 'criminal mug shots'. Talk In general there was no distinction between the criminal arrangement of the 'staff mugshots' and the 'criminal mugshots' which recreates comparative discoveries acquired in contemplates by Goring (1972) and Kurtzberg et al, (1978). This infers Lombroso's unique thoughts and speculations about specific qualities prompting culpability have been undermined by this examination. The information displayed in table 2 can be depicted as regularly disseminated as the closures of the scale are meagerly possessed; anyway the lion's share of members from the two gatherings were coded as having between 2-5 criminal qualities. As indicated by Lombrosso a criminal was said to have at least four qualities, in this manner in light of results got one might say that the dispersion of apparently 'criminal' attributes is in reality exceptionally typical. One confinement to this examination is that it is completely subjective as one individual is judging the photographs on whether they are 'criminal' or not founded on an arrangement of saw qualities. This may prompt an absence of unwavering quality as a similar outcome can't be ensured if the investigation is rehashed. A further constraint concerning subjectivity is the characterization of the criminal qualities, for example what constitutes as 'tremendous' while depicting the jaw or 'over the top' while naming skin wrinkles. Advance inside and out arrangement is required to build up whether a specific characteristic is available. Despite the fact that the outcomes from this investigation and others recommend that Lombroso's (2006) strategy for criminal profiling is obsolete, it has prompted the utilization of comparative techniques utilizing data, for example, childhood or substance use to build up whether a man is probably going to perpetrate a wrongdoing.>