“Currently, the U.S. admits more than 1.5 million legal and illegal immigrants every year, with more than 70 percent coming to the country through the process known as “chain migration” whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an UNLIMITED relatives to the U.S. In the next 20 years, the current U.S. legal immigration system is on track to import 15 million new foreign-born voters. Between 7 and 8 million of those foreign-born will arrive in the U.S. through chain migration.” JOHN BINDER

Friday, July 15, 2016

Hillary Clinton to Latinos: ‘You Are Not Intruders’: Former Secretary of State and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton told attendees at the League of United Latin American Citizens’ (LULAC) annual conference in Washington, D.C. on Thursday that they are not “intruders” and some may have been here before the U.S. was founded.

THERE IS A REASON WHY MEXICO HAS ENDORSED LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILLARIA!

Hillary Clinton to Latinos: ‘You Are Not Intruders’: Former Secretary of State and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton told attendees at the League of United Latin American Citizens’ (LULAC) annual conference in Washington, D.C. on Thursday that they are not “intruders” and some may have been here before the U.S. was founded.

Hillary Clinton to Latinos: ‘You Are Not Intruders’

Former Secretary of State and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton spoke at the League of United Latin American Citizens' conference on July 14, 2016 in Washington, D.C. (CNSNews.com/Penny Starr)

(CNSNews.com) – Former Secretary of State and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton told attendees at the League of United Latin American Citizens’ (LULAC) annual conference in Washington, D.C. on Thursday that they are not “intruders” and some may have been here before the U.S. was founded.

“We are not strangers. You are not intruders. You are our neighbors, our colleagues, our friends, our families. You make our nation stronger, smarter, more creative,” Clinton said.

“Whether you’re Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Afro-Latino, or from Central or South America; whether your family has just arrived or has been here since before the United States even existed, we are brothers and sisters, and I will be your champion,” she said.

“I want you to know I see you, I hear you, and I am with you,” Clinton added.

Clinton spoke at the conference’s “unity luncheon” and tweeted about shortly after her speech.

“Latinos have to help us shape the future of America because you are the future of America,” Clinton said on her Twitter account.

Clinton pledged that if she’s elected president a pathway to citizenship would be part of the immigrationreform package she would present to Congress in her first 100 days in office.MEXICO SUCKS OFF TENS OF BILLIONS OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY EVERY YEAR AND ARE A CRIME TIDAL WAVE!

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox: Voting for Trump is ‘Treason to Our Nation’

In “Vincente Fox & All Things Mexico,” Chelsea Handler celebrated the country of Mexico on her Netflix showChelsea. She stated that many Americans think Mexico is a great neighbor – “white, brown, black, but definitely not orange.” Ah, yes. Another show full of Trump bashing.

After going to Mexico City to interview actor Diego Luna while visiting a food market and drinking mescal, she next interviewed lefty actress Eva Longoria. Texas native Longoria wasted no time in going into “the border crossed us” monologue in Texas history. Now a Hillary supporter – she was an Obama supporter in 2008 and 2012 – she gladly took the opportunity afforded by Chelsea to bash Donald Trump for “fear mongering, blaming immigrants for problems.” Note that leftists never say the words “illegal immigrants.” She praised Chelsea’s anti-Trump efforts and said, “Don’t let up” on the bashing.

The grand finale was an interview with former Mexican President Vicente Fox. While saying both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush are still friends (he worked with both as Mexico’s president), he told a story about Bush’s first visit to his ranch. He said Bush was “afraid” of the horses and hadn’t ridden horses before that visit, though Fox thought of him as a fellow rancher. Chelsea asked, “Then why does he wear cowboy boots all the time?” Fox said, “Well, I gave him a pair.” As if that pair was Bush’s first pair of boots. That was really my only laugh in this episode.

Fox, though, is very worried about Donald Trump’s run for the White House. He tells the audience not to listen to “the false prophet” with the “crazy hair” and tells Mexicans in the United States, “It’s treason to our nation, to our origin to vote for him.” Excuse me, but this is an American election and loyalty is owed to this nation, not Mexico.

Fox is all about negotiating with drug cartels and calls himself an activist for legalizing all drugs, but he thinks the current presumptive Republican nominee is using “demagoguery and populism” as he promises to build a wall at the border. And if a trade war breaks out over better deals for America with a President Trump? Well, maybe Mexico “has to find new friends – maybe Russia, maybe we’re going to go back to the Cold War era.” Threats, El Presidente?

Some sage advice from Chelsea herself: if you don’t want to hear the constant, continuing Trump bashing on her show (she says she receives a lot of complaints on social media), “Watch something else.” Good idea.

Study shows immigrants use 40% more welfare than native born

The average immigrant household draws more than $6,000 from the welfare system in a year, costing U.S. taxpayers 41 percent more than people born in the country, a new study finds.

Immigrants with low education levels and higher numbers of children tend to use up the most benefits, according to the analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), which found immigrant families consume $6,234 a year on average. The benefits come in the form of cash payments, food, Medicaid and housing.

Illegal immigrant households are included in the figure, since some can access the system through their U.S.-born children. Although illegal immigrants are barred from accessing welfare payments, CIS determined the households still cost the system more than $5,600 in a year on average.

The study follows CIS reports last year that 51 percent of households led by immigrants use at least one welfare program, and legal immigrants account for 75 percent of all immigrant welfare use. Many immigrants hold jobs, but still qualify for welfare because they tend to make less money and have more children.

“If we continue to permit large numbers of less-educated people to move here from abroad, we have to accept that there will be huge and ongoing costs to taxpayers,” CIS executive director Mark Krikorian said in a statement announcing the study.

More than 24 percent of immigrant households are led by a high school dropout, compared to 8 percent of households led by individuals born in the country. Thirteen percent of immigrant-led households have three or more children, compared to just 6 percent of U.S.-born households.

If we lived in a country with an intelligent, logical, and reasonable immigration policy, this simply wouldn't happen. An immigrant would have to demonstrate that they have jobs skills so that they could support themselves. It would follow that these newcomers would have the education that would allow them to aquire the job skills to make them useful members of society.

Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.

A report from the Centers for Immigration Studies shows that immigrants tap into our welfare system far more than native born Americans.

The average immigrant household draws more than $6,000 from the welfare system in a year, costing U.S. taxpayers 41 percent more than people born in the country, a new study finds.

Immigrants with low education levels and higher numbers of children tend to use up the most benefits, according to the analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), which found immigrant families consume $6,234 a year on average. The benefits come in the form of cash payments, food, Medicaid and housing.

Illegal immigrant households are included in the figure, since some can access the system through their U.S.-born children. Although illegal immigrants are barred from accessing welfare payments, CIS determined the households still cost the system more than $5,600 in a year on average.

The study follows CIS reports last year that 51 percent of households led by immigrants use at least one welfare program, and legal immigrants account for 75 percent of all immigrant welfare use. Many immigrants hold jobs, but still qualify for welfare because they tend to make less money and have more children.

“If we continue to permit large numbers of less-educated people to move here from abroad, we have to accept that there will be huge and ongoing costs to taxpayers,” CIS executive director Mark Krikorian said in a statement announcing the study.

More than 24 percent of immigrant households are led by a high school dropout, compared to 8 percent of households led by individuals born in the country. Thirteen percent of immigrant-led households have three or more children, compared to just 6 percent of U.S.-born households.

If we lived in a country with an intelligent, logical, and reasonable immigration policy, this simply wouldn't happen. An immigrant would have to demonstrate that they have jobs skills so that they could support themselves. It would follow that these newcomers would have the education that would allow them to aquire the job skills to make them useful members of society.

Instead, we are admitting millions of nearly illiterate peasants from Central America and Mexico who will be dependent on the taxpayer until their children are grown. This makes a mockery of America being a land of opportunity when poverty, ignorance, and dependence prevent recent immigrants from moving ahead and become self sufficient.

The Telmex Foundation, founded by Mexicanbillionaire Carlos Slim, provided between$250,000 and $500,000 for a speech by HillaryClinton.Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even moreaggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executiveimmigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse to act, as president I would do everything possible under the law to go even further." She added,"That is just the beginning…"

APPARENTLY MEXICO'S LOOTING IN OUR OPEN BORDERS IS NOT BIG ENOUGH FOR LA RAZA HILLARY!Obama expanded his power domestically far more than any other president in memory. His executive action on immigration is a good example of legislating from the bureaucracy by implementing policies directly contrary to existing law and anything Congress would be willing to do.

The server scandal is a metaphor for the old Hillary — opaque, controlling, paranoid, ruthless and power-hungry. It's proof that she hasn't changed.

Now we have Candidate Clinton promising even more aggressive executive immigration amnesty than Obama. Not only has Hillary vowed to defend Obama's executive immigration actions, she said "if Congress continues to refuse to act, as president I would do everything possible under the law to go even further." She added, "That is just the beginning …"

Hillary Clinton's Crisis of Character

Crisis of Character is the perfect name for a book about Hillary Clinton. Written by former presidential Secret Service agent Gary Byrne, it recounts how he was up close and personal with the then First Lady. Anyone reading this book can relate his issues with the Clintons as to how she conducted herself while Secretary of State. While Bill Clinton had personal scandals of sexual harassment, Hillary Clinton has professional scandals. The baseball phrase three strikes and you’re out applies to her. Strike one, the botching of the reset button with Russia; strike two, the handling of Benghazi; and strike three, her email scandal.

In the book, Byrne describes her as “distant, cold, dishonest, and a habitual liar.” When asked about this, he told American Thinker, “Americans need to know that Mrs. Clinton is not a leader. She displays a holier-than-thou attitude, ‘do as I say, not as I do.’ When I heard her say Bill Clinton would work with her on the economy, my first thoughts, ‘what steps will she take to protect young women working at the White House from him?’ Her pattern is deflection, deception, and lies.”A word Mr. Byrne forgot to mention regarding Hillary was 'incompetent'. Take, for example, the reset button given to Russia’s foreign minister Sergei Lavrov in 2009. Lavrov noted the translation said, “overcharge,” not reset. Also, the word was typed in Latin script, not in Cyrillic. So wrong word. Wrong alphabet. It later came out that Hillary and company had sidestepped traditional protocol by not asking State’s team of translators to help.Now she wants the American people to hit the reset button on her scandals. Bryne has many adjectives to describe the Clintons, including “Crass, arrogant, and ruthless.” While going into great detail about the Battle of Mogadishu in 1993, he points out how the Army Rangers were stripped of requested equipment so they did not look intimidating. Sound familiar? Seems Hillary Clinton used it as her playbook for Benghazi. He explained that her testimony fit into the behavior he was familiar with, especially when she uttered the line, “what difference does it make,” while speaking of those who died. There is also the example of how she lied to the families, blaming it on a video instead of terrorism. It did not matter that there was a rescue force waiting for eight hours to get the action order, one that never came. Byrne is hoping the American people understand that “she has a deep-seated dislike of the uniformed military and uniformed law enforcement. The very sight of us bothers her. She always gets a pass. It is like we are in this alternative universe. Bill Clinton had Black Hawk Down and she has Benghazi. Mrs. Clinton does not know how to manage and supervise, but does know how to yell and dictate. John Wooden said, ‘A test of someone’s character is what they do when no one is watching.’”Interestingly, everything he mentioned about her in the book can be applied to the email scandal. He talked about the Clintons having the attitude that they were above the law. Just refer to the meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the runway in Arizona. Then a few days later FBI Director James Comey said about the findings, “this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.”Byrne spoke of how Hillary liked to deflect blame, pleading ignorance. Comey pointed out in his news conference how “None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at departments and agencies of the U.S. Government -- or even with a commercial service like Gmail.”Throughout the interview Byrne mentioned how Hillary lies and deceives. Remember in her March 15th news conference she claimed, “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material." Yet Comey reported that the FBI identified 113 emails that passed through her server, containing materials that were classified at the time sent, including some that were Top Secret.Finally, Byrne noted she is “arrogant, has disdain, and a desire to push her agenda regardless of the damages. She does not care about any criticism.” This is obvious in Comey’s conclusion, “There is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information… There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.”As a side note, Byrne told American Thinker, “Her attitude was so bad it got to a point that Secret Service agents assigned to her detail would think of it as a punishment. Part of our job hazard was having to deal with her anger management issues.”Crisis of Character offers insight into the personality of Hillary Clinton. It confirms what people have seen regarding how she has conducted her professional life. It becomes obvious that her temperament of ignorance, hypocrisy, and the poor choices she has made are reasons why she should never be elected president. The author writes for American Thinker. She has done book reviews, author interviews, and has written a number of national security, political, and foreign policy articles.

Crisis of Character is the perfect name for a book about Hillary Clinton. Written by former presidential Secret Service agent Gary Byrne, it recounts how he was up close and personal with the then First Lady. Anyone reading this book can relate his issues with the Clintons as to how she conducted herself while Secretary of State. While Bill Clinton had personal scandals of sexual harassment, Hillary Clinton has professional scandals. The baseball phrase three strikes and you’re out applies to her. Strike one, the botching of the reset button with Russia; strike two, the handling of Benghazi; and strike three, her email scandal. In the book, Byrne describes her as “distant, cold, dishonest, and a habitual liar.” When asked about this, he told American Thinker, “Americans need to know that Mrs. Clinton is not a leader. She displays a holier-than-thou attitude, ‘do as I say, not as I do.’ When I heard her say Bill Clinton would work with her on the economy, my first thoughts, ‘what steps will she take to protect young women working at the White House from him?’ Her pattern is deflection, deception, and lies.”A word Mr. Byrne forgot to mention regarding Hillary was 'incompetent'. Take, for example, the reset button given to Russia’s foreign minister Sergei Lavrov in 2009. Lavrov noted the translation said, “overcharge,” not reset. Also, the word was typed in Latin script, not in Cyrillic. So wrong word. Wrong alphabet. It later came out that Hillary and company had sidestepped traditional protocol by not asking State’s team of translators to help.Now she wants the American people to hit the reset button on her scandals. Bryne has many adjectives to describe the Clintons, including “Crass, arrogant, and ruthless.” While going into great detail about the Battle of Mogadishu in 1993, he points out how the Army Rangers were stripped of requested equipment so they did not look intimidating. Sound familiar? Seems Hillary Clinton used it as her playbook for Benghazi. He explained that her testimony fit into the behavior he was familiar with, especially when she uttered the line, “what difference does it make,” while speaking of those who died. There is also the example of how she lied to the families, blaming it on a video instead of terrorism. It did not matter that there was a rescue force waiting for eight hours to get the action order, one that never came. Byrne is hoping the American people understand that “she has a deep-seated dislike of the uniformed military and uniformed law enforcement. The very sight of us bothers her. She always gets a pass. It is like we are in this alternative universe. Bill Clinton had Black Hawk Down and she has Benghazi. Mrs. Clinton does not know how to manage and supervise, but does know how to yell and dictate. John Wooden said, ‘A test of someone’s character is what they do when no one is watching.’”Interestingly, everything he mentioned about her in the book can be applied to the email scandal. He talked about the Clintons having the attitude that they were above the law. Just refer to the meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the runway in Arizona. Then a few days later FBI Director James Comey said about the findings, “this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.”Byrne spoke of how Hillary liked to deflect blame, pleading ignorance. Comey pointed out in his news conference how “None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at departments and agencies of the U.S. Government -- or even with a commercial service like Gmail.”Throughout the interview Byrne mentioned how Hillary lies and deceives. Remember in her March 15th news conference she claimed, “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material." Yet Comey reported that the FBI identified 113 emails that passed through her server, containing materials that were classified at the time sent, including some that were Top Secret.Finally, Byrne noted she is “arrogant, has disdain, and a desire to push her agenda regardless of the damages. She does not care about any criticism.” This is obvious in Comey’s conclusion, “There is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information… There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.”As a side note, Byrne told American Thinker, “Her attitude was so bad it got to a point that Secret Service agents assigned to her detail would think of it as a punishment. Part of our job hazard was having to deal with her anger management issues.”Crisis of Character offers insight into the personality of Hillary Clinton. It confirms what people have seen regarding how she has conducted her professional life. It becomes obvious that her temperament of ignorance, hypocrisy, and the poor choices she has made are reasons why she should never be elected president. The author writes for American Thinker. She has done book reviews, author interviews, and has written a number of national security, political, and foreign policy articles.