Sunday, June 7, 2015

With the Pier Park decision and the approval of the Downtown
Waterfront Master Plan it seems pretty clear that the Mayor's Office and City
Council cannot be trusted to protect the waterfront.

Pier Park continues through its "redesign" phase, see
my post The
Incredible Shrinking Pier, and the Downtown Waterfront Master Plan (DWMP),
while modified to eliminate the hotel/conference center and renaming some for
the Development Opportunity sites, still seems to be more of an attack on the waterfront
than a plan to protect it.

The mind boggling thing about all of this is seeming lack of
commitment to protect the City's most valuable asset by the City Council.

With the stage set for a new "Pier" that, if it can
actually be constructed, will not look anything like the plans that were sold
to the public over their whishes, and a DWMP that at the very least opens the
door wider for development, what will those in St. Pete that really want to
protect the waterfront do?

The case will be made that the current charter provides for a
public referendum for certain activities on the water front, but it is far to
narrow and as we have seen Mayors and City Councils seem to always find a way
to do what they want as opposed to what the public desires while skirting the
referendum process.

Those who would protect the waterfront are at a critical moment.
Will they move forward with a referendum to modify the charter and tighten up
the requirement for waterfront changes and development or is it time to just
give up?

Given the results of the LENS, Pier Park and the waterfront
master plan it seems the only true way to protect the waterfront is to give the
people the final say in ALL that happens on the waterfront.

There will be cries from the politicians, developers and others
that it will be too restrictive. Could be, but that entire outcry is really
about a few people making a lot of money and politicians getting some big
campaign contributions all at the cost of your waterfront.

The waterfront is the people's property, and it's time for the
City Charter to make that crystal clear.