9/11: The Pentagon - Jesse Ventura Speaks With Pilots For 9/11 Truth

A short interview clip with Jesse Ventura, filmed and produced by Captain Rob Balsamo, Founder of Pilots For 9/11 Truth.

Jesse Ventura invited representatives of Pilots For 9/11 Truth to discuss the 9/11/2001 attack on the Pentagon.

Pentagon – NEW!

Airs: Fri, December 17 at 10P

The idea that a missile or explosives—not a hijacked jetliner—damaged the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 seems the most unlikely of 9/11 theories.
That is, until you look at all the factors, which include eyewitness testimony, crime scene video, expert analysis and the question why, with 85
cameras trained on the building, have only five frames of crash footage have ever been released? Jesse Ventura leads a serious investigation into a
tangled web of clues that some say are too sacred to even touch.

Jesse Ventura's show is my favorite conspiracy/alternative show ever. He really does get into the issues facing not only the United States, but the
world. His determination and forwardness make him a great host, and also being a former governor and Navy Seal helps greatly also. It's good to see
the views for Conspiracy Theory doing well, because most people don't realize how corrupt and malicious (and meticulous) the elites and
governments of the world really are.

Can't wait for the season finale this Friday! Keep up the work Mr. Ventura.

Ah,I can't wait for this ep! it's gonna bring some major activity to this sub-forum.Jesse and the show do a great job introducing the general public
to alternative views.The 1st 911 ep was great this one is gonna have people talking which is to me one of the main points of the TM.

Yeah, but he might want to comb his hair. Also ... I would suggest NOT running around in the woods with Alex Jones... Take away all of that, and the
fact the he was a pro wrestler and shunned by Govt while he was governor, Yeah ... he is exactly what the conspiracy theorists need.

Can't we get a "normal" guy? Or at least a guy that looks 50% less crazy?

Do you think the Obama administration has allowed these shows to air? I just can't imagine if Bush (or McCain) were in office, they'd permit
anti-Official Story of 9-11 to go public.
I can't help to think TruTV is being backed, financed, granted permission (something) by the Democratic party.

Just my 2-cents.

But way to go!!!!
I hope the truth about 9-11 will be revealed before the truth regarding UFO cover-ups becomes realized. Then the 'people' will know exactly
how their government operates and that's....in their OWN best interest. Not ours!

No one who sees the pics taken just after the crash would believe a jetliner hit the Pentagon..
As for the 5 lousy frames of proof..

Bu bu but, that is for our safety. 'member? They didn't reveal more because of that patsy trial of the 20th hijacker, 'member? And now it's so the
boogie man doesn't see how that miraculous feat was accomplished thus keeping us safe from those talented and terrible terrorists (who actually sit
in the White House and 10 Downing Street).

So, don't question it. Accept it as safety measurements.
Now it's time to get fleeced. You first!
Baaaaah.

I like Jesse... I respect the fact that he was a seal.. But that is about it.. He is on the edge of looking/acting crazy.
Can't he at least comb his hair for interviews?

Then how come 75% of us aren't banned? I must've missed something somewhere.

Comb his hair? Is that really your concern?

You know, when you realize reality isn't what it's purported to be (whether 9-11, off-world entities or governments CONSTANTLY lying to us) you'd
go crazy too. Glad I pulled myself together but I definitely could've starred in the next episode of One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest if I let this
stuff get to me (like it used to)

Resurrectio, I know we disagree on many if not all topics and I just hope we're both around when I can smile at you and say: I told ya so!
But for now......it's healthy to have opponents I s'pose.

Originally posted by TheFonz
The idea that a missile or explosives—not a hijacked jetliner—damaged the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 seems the most unlikely of 9/11 theories.
That is, until you look at all the factors, which include eyewitness testimony, crime scene video, expert analysis and the question why, with 85
cameras trained on the building, have only five frames of crash footage have ever been released? Jesse Ventura leads a serious investigation into a
tangled web of clues that some say are too sacred to even touch.

Now here is a classic case of how the trusters work. The rest of us have been posting eyewitness accounts reporting it was a passenger jet, photos of
aircraft wreckage, etc to the point where it's practically spamming...and yet these conspiracy people continue to mindlessly trust everything Dylan
Avery, Alex Jones, and now, Jesse Ventura, says...who turns out to be just repeating whatever Alex Jones says...like it was religious gospel.

Look at this statement above- "Why, with 85 cameras trained at the building, have only five frames been released". This is nothing but innuendo
dropping- the plane hit a blank wall that had no main entrance, and all the cameras were/are trained on high traffic areas like entrances, parking
lots, security gates, and the like, so there's no sign anywhere except in the mind of the conspiracy people there even is any additional footage.
THAT has been explained here ad nauseum as well and yet this "why don't they release the video" innuendo simply is too sexy sounding for the trusters
to ever give it up. I thank the OP for posting this, becuase now it's proof positive that Ventura isn't really doing any research, but is simply
hanging around the con artists behind those damned fool conspiracy web sites like Rob Balsamo.

What makes me sad is that not even the conspiracy people are buying Amerian anymore- the "no plane hit the Pentagon" BS was invented by some kook over
in France to sell a bunch of books.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.