xiphmont at xiph.org wrote:
> In fact we have an official policy of neglect w.r.t. tags mainly
> because two things keep happening over and over again:
>> 1) Someone shows up with a 'MUST HAVE' list of about a hundred and
> eighty tags and spends weeks bikeshedding on the lists and wasting
> everyones' time .
...
Martin Leese <martin.leese at stanfordalumni.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:30 AM, <xiphmont at xiph.org> wrote:
>>> I am sane, but do not use VorbisComments
>>> *at all*. I therefore cannot do an update
>>> without guidance.
>>>> Perfect! You're hired. Oh, you've already been working here for years? Good!
>> I accept this mission.
Mission accomplished.
I have put the result in the XiphWiki, visit:
http://wiki.xiph.org/Field_names
I tried to upload the analysis Excel
spreadsheet to the wiki, but uploads are
disabled. I tried attaching it to this post, but
this tipped the post over 40 kbytes and it then
got stuck waiting for approval by a moderator.
I will attach it to a following (minimal) post to
try to squeeze it through. (Note that the
spreadsheet will contains two sheets.)
As requested, I kept the number of field
names to less than 180.
Regards,
Martin
--
Martin J Leese
E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org
Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/