What this tells me is that the Sublime homepage needs a refresh. Badly. So many Mac users will reject apps out of hand if the initial look and feel isn't right. That applies to the website of the app, too. If a Mac user visited that site then Sublime, I fear they'd assume Chocolat is the superior product, which I don't think it is. I'm really liking wbond's clean, tight style atm...

charlesroper wrote:What this tells me is that the Sublime homepage needs a refresh. Badly. So many Mac users will reject apps out of hand if the initial look and feel isn't right. That applies to the website of the app, too. If a Mac user visited that site then Sublime, I fear they'd assume Chocolat is the superior product, which I don't think it is. I'm really liking wbond's clean, tight style atm...

charlesroper wrote:What this tells me is that the Sublime homepage needs a refresh. Badly. So many Mac users will reject apps out of hand if the initial look and feel isn't right. That applies to the website of the app, too. If a Mac user visited that site then Sublime, I fear they'd assume Chocolat is the superior product, which I don't think it is. I'm really liking wbond's clean, tight style atm...

I did offer Jon a new website layout etc.

And I offered him a new icon. Jon, please take 2 minutes from programming to say "yes" to those who are offering to help.

charlesroper wrote:What this tells me is that the Sublime homepage needs a refresh. Badly. So many Mac users will reject apps out of hand if the initial look and feel isn't right. That applies to the website of the app, too. If a Mac user visited that site then Sublime, I fear they'd assume Chocolat is the superior product, which I don't think it is. I'm really liking wbond's clean, tight style atm...

I did offer Jon a new website layout etc.

And I offered him a new icon. Jon, please take 2 minutes from programming to say "yes" to those who are offering to help.