I do not think there would be a problem in an organisation publishing a "Best of Spearhead" series.
Indeed, shortly before his death, John told me that he was going to do this himself. He had already selected the first few articles ready for publication but sadly, he never had chance to finish the job.

The question that now arises is who would be the most suitable to select and publish the articles and, equally importantly, where should they appear?

I do not think there would be a problem in an organisation publishing a "Best of Spearhead" series.
Indeed, shortly before his death, John told me that he was going to do this himself. He had already selected the first few articles ready for publication but sadly, he never had chance to finish the job.

The question that now arises is who would be the most suitable to select and publish the articles and, equally importantly, where should they appear?

The only ones capable of giving a project like this the chance to reach its full potential is the BNP.

It is a shame that Spearhead is no longer around. Many of the articles were excellent and made some good and well-argued points some of which I agreed with some of which I didn't. The best articles John Tyndall penned were the ones where he warned of the political difficulties caused to the movement by English 'nationalism' and the way the Establishment were using that to defeat the cause.

John told me on several occasions that while he was inordinately proud of Spearhead's popularity, he realised that he had, most probably, put it before his day-to-day administration of the party.
He said that he was, at times, too absorbed in his writing and his orating to notice the knives were being sharpened. But that was John; a trusting and honest man expecting others to play by the same code of conduct.