On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:20 PM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
> Policy Proposal 119: Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy
>> Policy statement: Any RIR's member may transfer IPv4 addresses to the
> member of another RIR as long as the two RIRs agree and exercise
> Internet stewardship and the values expressed in RFC2050.
"two RIRs agree" is slightly fuzzy. I suggest slightly more words:
"so long as the transfer is consistent with both RIR policies for the
inter-region transfer of addresses."
I'd also ditch the stewardship line. It adds fuzziness that's
difficult to evaluate in a practical and consistent way. Besides, if
both RIRs set policy to a different standard of stewardship, why tie
their hands?
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.combill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004