While it often seems that the primary purpose of higher education has become only job preparation, there is another movement afoot that focuses on restoring the civic mission of higher education. When the first universities, both public and private, were established in the early days of the republic, a significant emphasis was on preparing students for life in a democratic society.

The question I’d like to discuss today is what it is institutions of higher education, whether they be community colleges or four year institutions, should be doing to prepare their students to be engaged citizens after the graduate? What skills, habits, and dispositions would those of us living in these communities want them to have and how might we best teach this?

I am interested in this question both because I am a political scientist who teaches American politics and because I care about the health of our democracy, from the ground up. I worry about the increased polarization in American national politics and the way in which it has seeped into state and local politics as well.

Do our graduates have the skills, knowledge, and dispositions they need to live in a pluralistic democracy?

Do they know how to listen to people with whom they disagree?

To engage in civil dialogue across difference?

To compromise and work with others to find common ground for action?

One way I have tried to address these concerns and questions is through the teaching and practice of deliberative dialogue. In recent years I’ve also made it part of my research agenda.

I have been working with colleagues from the Communications and Psychology departments on a long term study of the impact of learning to engage in deliberative dialogue while in college. We started the project fourteen years ago with a group of incoming first year students in the Fall of 2001. They took a first year seminar on Democracy and Deliberation and learned both the theory and practice of deliberation. During their sophomore and junior years they organized and moderated deliberations on campus and in the community.

When these students graduated, they had developed attitudes about participation and politics that were different from their class cohorts who were not in the program. One of the stand-out differences was how they talked about why they would participate in politics in the future. The students who had learned to deliberate defined citizenship responsibilities as working with others to address challenges in the community. Students without the exposure to deliberation said they would participate in order to protect their self- interests.

We recently completed a follow up study with the alumni of this program. We wondered whether these differences had endured out in the “real world” and whether they thought their education had prepared them to be active, engaged citizens.

We found that the program effects endured. These alumni were more willing to talk with others with whom they disagreed, were more engaged in political activities, and were still using their deliberative skills in their homes and workplaces. These findings give us hope that teaching students to deliberate is one way in which colleges and universities can fulfill their civic mission.

I would love to hear from othersin higher education about other kinds of classroom and experiential learning that appears to work.

You can learn about the first study here. We are nearing completion of the full report on the follow-up for the Kettering Foundation.

I am also anxious to hear from those of you in local government and in communities what you think is missing from the knowledge and skill set of young people who leave college and join your communities. What do you wish we were teaching students to do and think that we don’t appear to be doing now?

Katy Harriger, is Professor and Chair of the Politics and International Affairs Department, at Wake Forest University (WFU). Katy teaches in the American politics field and does research on the civic engagement of young people, with a particular interest in deliberative dialogue. Katy has organized deliberations with community groups in Winston-Salem and student participants at WFU.

2 Responses to “Preparing Engaged Citizens for Life in Community”

Katy – thanks. A few thoughts, two whereI hope you can reply and others to ponder:

a) Please add a comment here when your follow-up report is complete
b) Have other universities done similar follow-up work? Or is your student cohort at Wake Forest Univ. the only ones studied both during their time on campus and post-graduation?

c) Are there any similar – or simpler – models for teaching deliberation which could apply in community colleges, local leadership programs, or citizen academies (See Rick Morse’s post about citizen academies)? I am concerned about being sure this capacity building for civic engagement can reach more people, of different backgrounds and at different stages in their lives.

d) Any thought about doing some of this online? I am a big believer in the value of face-to-face work on deliberation, so I am not saying “online will work.” Then again, thinking of how more people are spending their time online, just wondering what you think of efforts such as Text, Talk, and Act, a part of the National Dialogue on Mental Health, is a new form of engagement that has involved over 20,000 Americans in discussion and action on mental health. http://deliberative-democracy.net/index.php/projects-general/188-texttalkact

Katy,
What a wonderful program this is – congratulations on doing such great work!
I would echo John’s question about ways to incorporate this type of training into other scenarios in order to broaden its reach. I was a philosophy major in undergrad and felt that the ability to logically deliberate, hold amicable discussions, and compare and synthesize differing viewpoints was one of the most useful skills I took with me. We tried to broaden that in a similar way by hosting forums and events on campus with students in other discipline, but encountered the usual barriers – attendance, scheduling, time, etc. Your approach seems much more structured and likely to succeed over time.
Great work, and please keep us posted on what other ideas you may be working on with this!
Emily

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name* (required)

Email (will not be published)* (required)

Comment

Please Note…

This site welcomes a variety of viewpoints and perspectives on community engagement. Ideas shared here should not be considered as being endorsed by the UNC School of Government. The School is nonpartisan and policy-neutral.