On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> My hope remains that we settle on MIT. If the W3C and WHATWG can't come
> to an agreement on a license, then we will need to revisit this -- but
> then again, we will need to revisit a lot of assumptions, so I would
> recommend that we cross that bridge when we get to it.
I assume you mean "If the W3C and the HTMLWG participants can't come to an
agreement...", not "W3C and WHATWG"; I'm unaware of any W3C/WHATWG
communication on the subject. As far as I'm aware, it's only an internal
HTMLWG issue regarding the licensing of the HTMLWG deliverables.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'