THE LA RAZA CRIME TIDAL WAVE - “These figures do not attempt to allege that foreign
nationals in the country illegally commit more
crimes than other groups,” the report states. “It
simply identifies thousands of crimes that should
not have occurred and thousands of victims that
should not have been victimized because the
perpetrator should not be here.”
CHARLOTTE CUTHBERTSON

Thursday, November 1, 2012

UNDER OBAMA MOST JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS

WHEN OBAMA MADE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST
HILDA SOLIS SEC. of ILLEGAL LABOR, HE KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING. BUYING VOTES OF
ILLEGALS WITH OUR JOBS.

WHEN OBAMA NOMINATED SELF-STYLED “WISE
LATINA” SONIA SOTOMAYER TO THE HIGH COURT, HE KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING. SOTOMAYER
VOTED AGAINST E-VERIFY!

WHEN OBAMA SUED THE STATE OF ARIZONA TO
BLOCK E-VERIFY, HE KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING.

…IT’S ALL ABOUT PUTTING ILLEGALS INTO OUR JOBS TO BUY THEIR
VOTES AND KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED.

THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A
POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY WHERE 90% OF THE SERVICE AND
CONSTRUCTION SECTOR JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS.
THIS SAME COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION TO ILLEGALS ON WELFARE, AND ENJOYS A
TAX-FREE MEXICAN UNDERGROUND ECONOMY CALCULATED TO BE IN EXCESS OF $2 BILLION
PER YEAR!

Two-thirds of jobs go
to immigrants during Obama’s four years

Researchers say legals
and illegals are more mobile than natives in America

Two-thirds of those who have found employment under President
Obama are immigrants, both legal and illegal, according to an analysis that
suggests immigration has soaked up a large portion of what little job growth
there has been over the past three years.

The Center for Immigration Studies is releasing the study Thursday
morning, a day ahead of the final Labor Department unemployment report of the
campaign season, which is expected to show a sluggish job market more than
three years into the economic recovery.

That slow market, combined with the immigration numbers, could
explain why Mr. Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney have struggled to find
a winning jobs message in some of the country's hardest-hit postindustrial
regions.

"It's extraordinary that most of the employment growth in the
last four years has gone to the foreign-born, but what's even more
extraordinary is the issue has not even come up during a presidential election
that is so focused on jobs," said Steven A. Camarota, the center's
research director, who wrote the report along with demographer Karen Zeigler.

His numbers are stark: Since the first quarter of 2009, the number
of immigrants of working age (16 to 65) who are employed has risen 2 million,
from 21.2 million to 23.2 million. During the same time, native-born employment
has risen just 1 million, to reach 119.9 million.

It's a trend years in the making: Immigrants are working more, and
native-born Americans are working less.

In 2000, 76 percent of natives aged 18 to 65 were employed, but
that dropped steadily to 69 percent this September. By contrast, immigrants
started the last decade at 71 percent employment and rose to a peak of 74
percent at the height of the George W. Bush-era economic boom. They since have
slid down to 69 percent amid the sluggish economy.

Competitive advantage

The Center for Immigration Studies, which wants the government to
impose stricter limits on immigration, based its numbers on the Census Bureau's
Current Population Survey.

Alex Nowrasteh, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute, which
favors letting the markets rather than the government control the flow of
immigration, said Mr. Camarota's numbers are "making a mountain out of a
molehill."

He said delving into specific numbers explains why immigrants have
done better over the past four years: They generally gravitate toward parts of
the economy that have picked up faster in the nascent recovery.

"Most of the areas of the U.S. economy that are hiring right
now, like agriculture and high-tech industries, are those where immigrants have
always been overly represented," Mr. Nowrasteh said.

He also said immigrants are quicker to jump into the rebounding
job market while native-born Americans, who under federal law have more welfare
options and access to unemployment benefits, are slower to find work.

Mr. Nowrasteh and Mr. Camarota said another factor could be
immigrants' mobility.

Natives have roots wherever they live, and it may take higher
wages to get them to move for jobs, even if their homes are in depressed areas.
Immigrants already have uprooted themselves and can more easily pick places
where jobs are available.

Indeed, Mr. Camarota's numbers show that most of the immigrant
employment growth went to new arrivals, not to foreign-born residents already
in the United States — a figure that suggests immigrants already settled here
were having some of the same difficulties as the native-born.

There is some bright news: an uptick over the past year among
native-born Americans accounting for two-thirds of all new employment growth.

Full overhaul

Net immigration — both legal and illegal — averaged more than 1.1
million in the 1990s and slightly less than 900,000 in the past decade.

Mr. Camarota said it didn't slow much despite the economic
downturn.

"We have a situation
where the job market — the bottom fell out, yet we kept legal immigration
relatively high without even a national debate," he said. "As a
consequence, a lot of the job growth has been going to immigrants."

Immigration has been a touchy political issue for more than a
decade, and while all sides agree that the system is broken, efforts to
overhaul it in 2006 and 2007 fell short.

This campaign, Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama have talked about streamlining
the legal immigration system to allow in more high-tech workers. Mr. Romney has
said he wants to "staple a green card" to every advanced degree in
science, mathematics or engineering earned by an immigrant.

Beyond that, Mr. Obama has vowed to make legalizing illegal
immigrants a major push in a second term — and has said if he wins re-election,
he thinks Republicans will embrace that goal, realizing that otherwise,
Hispanic voters will reject the GOP.

Mr. Romney has talked about legalizing a small number of illegal
immigrants, though he has been studiously vague about his specific plans in an
effort to try not to alienate voters on either side of the issue.

Mr. Obama did take action
this year to grant many illegal immigrants up to 30 years of age a tentative
legal status that prevents them from being deported and authorizes them to work
in the United States.

Some Republicans in
Congress have criticized Mr. Obama's policy, saying it violates his powers and
will mean more competition for scarce jobs.

Mr. Romney has said he would not rescind any stays of deportation
that Mr. Obama issues but wouldn't issue any new ones himself.

The current system doles out legal visas based on family ties or
employment prospects or even a random lottery designed to increase the
diversity of those coming to the United States.

In 2007, senators proposed scrapping the legal system and
replacing it with a points-based system that would assign a desirability grade
to would-be immigrants. Work skills would have gained under that system.

But that proposal, along with the rest of the bill, collapsed amid
a bipartisan Senate filibuster.

Mr. Nowrasteh at the Cato Institute said those decisions shouldn't
be left up to bureaucrats anyway.

"The government can't pick winners and losers when it comes
to green-energy firms like Solyndra, so what makes you think it can pick
winners and losers when it comes to immigration?" he asked rhetorically.

Wall Street
cheered and stock prices rose when the US Labor Department announced last
Friday that employers had expanded their payrolls by 262,000 positions in
February.

But it
wasn't entirely good news. The statisticians also indicated that the share of
the adult population holding jobs had slipped slightly from January to 62.3
percent. That's now two full percentage points below the level in the
brief recession that began in March 2001.

Why the
apparent contradiction? Reasons abound: population growth, rising retirements.
But one factor that gets little attention is immigration.

In the past
four years, the number of immigrants into the US, legal and illegal, has
closely matched the number of new jobs. That suggests newcomers have, in effect,
snapped up all of the new jobs.

"There
has been no net job gain for natives," says Andrew Sum, an economist at
Northeastern University.

In the
US, President Bush calls for giving millions of illegal immigrants a kind of
guest-worker status as a legal path to US citizenship. So far, no specific
legislation to implement his suggestion has been put before Congress.

Meanwhile,
US border patrols spend millions of dollars a year trying to keep illegals out.
And yet, they keep coming, evidently little discouraged by recession or the
9/11 attacks. In the past four years alone, the number of immigrants ran some
2.5 million to 3 million, of which about half were illegal.

They
come for jobs, of course. And the Bush administration makes barely any effort
to enforce current law. In 2003, a total of 13 employers were fined for hiring
undocumented employees.

In fact,
neither Republicans nor Democrats have promoted enforcement of immigration law
prohibiting the hiring of illegal immigrants, says Mr. Sum, head of
Northeastern's Center for Labor Market Studies.

What
employers really want in many cases by hiring immigrants is to hold down wage
costs, experts say.

Most Mexican
Immigrants in New Study Gave Up Jobs to Take Their Chances in U.S.

By NINA BERNSTEINNew York Times

A report about the work lives of
recent Mexican immigrants in seven cities across the United States suggests
that they typically traded jobs in Mexico for the prospect of work here, despite serious bouts of
unemployment, job instability and poor wages.

The report, released Tuesday by
the Pew Hispanic Center, was based on surveys of nearly 5,000 Mexicans, most of
them here illegally.

Those surveyed were seeking
identity documents at Mexican consulates in New York, Atlanta and Raleigh,
N.C., where recent arrivals have gravitated toward construction, hotel and
restaurant jobs, and in Dallas, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Fresno, Calif., where
they have been more likely to work in agriculture and manufacturing.

Unlike the stereotype of jobless
Mexicans heading north, most of the immigrants had been employed in Mexico, the
report found.

Once in the United States, they
soon found that their illegal status was no barrier to being hired here. And
though the jobs they landed, typically with help from relatives, were often
unstable and their median earnings only $300 a week, that was enough to keep
drawing newcomers because wages here far exceeded those in Mexico.

"We're getting a peek at a
segment of the U.S. labor force that is large, that is growing by illegal
migration, and that is bringing an entirely new set of issues into the U.S.
labor market," said Rakesh Kochhar, associate director for research at the
Pew Hispanic Center and author of the study.

The report suggested that policies
intended to reduce migration pressures by improving the Mexican economy would
have to look beyond employment to wages and perceptions of opportunity.

The survey found that the most
recent to arrive were more likely to have worked in construction or commerce,
rather than agriculture, in Mexico. Only 5 percent had been unemployed there;
they were "drawn not from the fringes, but from the heart of Mexico's
labor force," the report said.

After a difficult transition in
their first six months in the United States - about 15 percent of the
respondents said they did not work during that time - the rate of unemployment
plummeted, to an average of 5 percent.

But in one of the most striking
findings, 38 percent reported an unemployment spell lasting a month or more in
the previous year, regardless of their location, legal status or length of time
in the United States.

"These are workers with no
safety net," Mr. Kochhar said. "The long-run implication is a
generation of workers without health or pension benefits, without any
meaningful asset accumulation."

On the other hand, Mr. Kochhar and
Roberto Suro, director of the Pew Hispanic Center, said the flexibility of this
work force was a boon to certain industries like home construction, an
important part of the nation's economic growth since the last recession.

Among respondents to the survey,
those who settled in Atlanta and Dallas were the best off, with 56 percent in
each city receiving a weekly wage higher than the $300-a-week median. The worst
off were in Fresno, where more than half of the survey respondents worked in
agriculture and 60 percent reported earning less than $300 a week. The lowest
wages were reported by women, people who spoke little or no English, and those
without identification.

To some scholars of immigration,
the report underlines the lack of incentives for employers to turn to a guest
worker program like the one proposed by President Bush because their needs are
met cheaply by illegal workers - and all without paperwork or long-term
commitment.

Guest workers might instead appeal
to corporations like Wal-Mart, the scholars said, where service jobs are now
the target of union organizing drives.

"You can't plausibly argue
that immigrant-dominated sectors have a labor shortage," said Robert
Courtney Smith, a sociologist and author of "Mexican New York:
Transnational Lives of New Immigrants." Instead, he said, the report and
evidence of falling wages among Mexican immigrants over time point to an
oversupply of vulnerable workers competing with each other.

But Brendan Flanagan, a spokesman
for the National Restaurant Association, which supports a guest worker program,
disagreed. "In many places it is difficult to fill jobs with domestic
workers," Mr. Flanagan said. "We've seen a simple lack of applicants,
regardless of what wage is offered."

Although the survey, conducted
from July 2004 to January 2005, was not random or weighted to represent all
Mexican immigrants, it offers a close look at a usually elusive population.

Those surveyed were not questioned
directly about their immigration status, but they were asked whether they had
any photo identification issued by a government agency in the United States.
Slightly more than half over all, and 75 percent in New York, said they did
not.

The migration is part of a
historic restructuring of the Mexican economy comparable to America's
industrial revolution, said Kathleen Newland, director of the Migration Policy
Institute, a research organization based in Washington.

The institute released its own
report on Tuesday, arguing that border enforcement efforts have failed.
Workplace enforcement, which has been neglected, would be a crucial part of
making a guest worker program successful.

For now, Mexicans keep arriving
illegally.

"It doesn't matter if it's
winter," said Ricardo Cortes, 23, a construction worker waiting for a
friend outside the Mexican consulate in New York on Tuesday. "People are still
coming because there's no money over there."

Here is an example of why hiring illegal aliens is not economically productive
for the State of California...

You have 2 families..."Joe Legal" and "Jose Illegal". Both
families have 2 parents, 2 children and live in California.

"Joe Legal" works in construction, has a Social Security Number, and
makes $25.00 per hour with payroll taxes deducted...."Jose Illegal"
also works in construction, has "NO" Social Security Number, and gets
paid $15.00 cash "under the table".

Joe Legal...$25.00 per hour x 40 hours $1000.00 per week, $52,000 per year
Now take 30% away for state and federal tax

Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.

Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.

Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal
pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government
sponsored lunch.

Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children
go home.
Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same Police and Fire Services, but
Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.

Don't vote/support any politician that supports illegal aliens...
Its WAY PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans!

*

Is Illegal
Immigration Moral?

By
Victor Davis Hanson

11/25/2010

We know illegal immigration is no
longer really unlawful, but is it moral?

Usually Americans debate the fiscal
costs of illegal immigration. Supporters of open borders rightly remind us that
illegal immigrants pay sales taxes. Often their payroll-tax contributions are
not later tapped by Social Security payouts.

Opponents counter that illegal
immigrants are more likely to end up on state assistance, are less likely to
report cash income, and cost the state more through the duplicate issuing of
services and documents in both English and Spanish. Such to-and-fro talking
points are endless.

So is the debate over beneficiaries
of illegal immigration. Are profit-minded employers villains who want cheap
labor in lieu of hiring more expensive Americans? Or is the culprit a cynical
Mexican government that counts on billions of dollars in remittances from its
expatriate poor that it otherwise ignored?

Or is the engine that drives illegal
immigration the American middle class? Why should millions of suburbanites
assume that, like 18th-century French aristocrats, they should have imported
labor to clean their homes, manicure their lawns and watch over their kids?

Or is the catalyst the
self-interested professional Latino lobby in politics and academia that sees a
steady stream of impoverished Latin American nationals as a permanent
victimized constituency, empowering and showcasing elite self-appointed
spokesmen such as themselves?

Or is the real advocate the
Democratic Party that wishes to remake the electoral map of the American
Southwest by ensuring larger future pools of natural supporters? Again, the
debate over who benefits and why is never-ending.

But what is often left out of the
equation is the moral dimension of illegal immigration. We see the issue too
often reduced to caricature, involving a noble, impoverished victim without
much free will and subject to cosmic forces of sinister oppression. But
everyone makes free choices that affect others. So ponder the ethics of a guest
arriving in a host country knowingly against its sovereign protocols and laws.

First, there is the larger effect on
the sanctity of a legal system. If a guest ignores the law -- and thereby often
must keep breaking more laws -- should citizens also have the right to
similarly pick and choose which statutes they find worthy of honoring and which
are too bothersome? Once it is deemed moral for the impoverished to cross a
border without a passport, could not the same arguments of social justice be
used for the poor of any status not to report earned income or even file a 1040
form?

Second, what is the effect of mass
illegal immigration on impoverished U.S. citizens? Does anyone care? When 10
million to 15 million aliens are here illegally, where is the leverage for the
American working poor to bargain with employers? If it is deemed ethical to
grant in-state tuition discounts to illegal-immigrant students, is it equally
ethical to charge three times as much for out-of-state, financially needy American
students -- whose federal government usually offers billions to subsidize state
colleges and universities? If foreign nationals are afforded more entitlements,
are there fewer for U.S. citizens?

Third, consider the moral
ramifications on legal immigration -- the traditional great strength of the
American nation. What are we to tell the legal immigrant from Oaxaca who got a
green card at some cost and trouble, or who, once legally in the United States,
went through the lengthy and expensive process of acquiring citizenship? Was he
a dupe to dutifully follow our laws?

And given the current precedent, if
a million soon-to-be-impoverished Greeks, 2 million fleeing North Koreans, or 5
million starving Somalis were to enter the United States illegally and en
masse, could anyone object to their unlawful entry and residence? If so, on
what legal, practical or moral grounds?

Fourth, examine the morality of
remittances. It is deemed noble to send billions of dollars back to families
and friends struggling in Latin America. But how is such a considerable loss of
income made up? Are American taxpayers supposed to step in to subsidize
increased social services so that illegal immigrants can afford to send
billions of dollars back across the border? What is the morality of that
equation in times of recession? Shouldn't illegal immigrants at least try to
buy health insurance before sending cash back to Mexico?

The debate over illegal immigration
is too often confined to costs and benefits. But ultimately it is a complicated
moral issue -- and one often ignored by all too many moralists.

Victor Davis Hanson

Victor
Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford
University, and a recipient of the 2007 National Humanities Medal.

SANCTUARY COUNTY LOS ANGELES SPENDS $600 MILLION ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS

County Spends $600 Mil On
Welfare For Illegal Immigrants

Last Updated: Thu, 03/11/2010 - 3:14pm

For the second consecutive year taxpayers in a
single U.S. county will dish out more than half a billion dollars just to cover
the welfare and food-stamp costs of illegal immigrants.

Los Angeles County, the nation’s most populous, may be in the midst of a
dire financial crisis but somehow there are plenty of funds for illegal aliens.
In January alone, anchor babies born to the county’s illegal immigrants
collected more than $50
million in welfare benefits. At that rate the cash-strapped county will pay
around $600 million this year to provide illegal aliens’ offspring with food
stamps and other welfare perks.

The exorbitant figure, revealed this week by a
county supervisor, doesn’t even include the enormous cost of educating,
medically treating or incarcerating illegal aliens in the sprawling county of
about 10 million residents. Los Angeles County annually spends more than $1
billion for those combined services, including $500 million for healthcare and
$350 million for public safety.

About a quarter of the county’s welfare and food
stamp issuances go to parents who reside in the United States illegally and
collect benefits for their anchor babies, according to the figures from the
county’s Department of Social Services. In 2009 the tab ran $570 million and
this year’s figure is expected to increase by several million dollars.

Illegal immigration continues to have a “catastrophic
impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers,” the veteran county supervisor
(Michael Antonovich) who revealed the information has said. The former
fifth-grade history teacher has repeatedly come under fire from his liberal
counterparts for publicizing statistics that confirm the devastation illegal
immigration has had on the region. Antonovich, who has served on the board for
nearly three decades, represents a portion of the county that is roughly twice
the size of Rhode Island and has about 2 million residents.

His district is simply a snippet of a larger crisis. Nationwide, Americans
pay around $22 billion annually to provide illegal immigrants with welfare
benefits that include food assistance programs such as free school lunches in
public schools, food stamps and a nutritional program (known as WIC) for low-income women and their
children. Tens of billions more are spent on other social services, medical
care, public education and legal costs such as incarceration and public
defenders.

*

Anchor Babies Grab One Quarter of Welfare
Dollars in LA Co

The anchor baby scam has proven lucrative for illegal aliens in Los Angeles
County, at considerable cost to our own poor and downtrodden legal citizenry.

The numbers show that more than $50 million in CalWORKS benefits and food
stamps for January went to children born in the United States whose parents are
in the country without documentation. This represents approximately 23 percent
of the total benefits under the state welfare and food stamp programs,
Antonovich said.

"When you add this to $350 million for public safety and nearly $500
million for health care, the total cost for illegal immigrants to county
taxpayers far exceeds $1 billion a year -- not including the millions of
dollars for education," Antonovich said.

I love children and I'm all for compassion -- smart, teach-them-to-fish
compassion. But when laws, the Constitution, and enforcement allow illegal
aliens (the operative word here being "illegal") to insinuate
themselves into our nation and bleed us of our precious financial resources,
then laws, the Constitution and enforcement need to be changed.

ANCHOR BABIES BORN IN OUR BORDERS ARE STILL CITIZENS OF MEXICO!

"Remember
187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens --
was the last gasp of white America in California." ---Art Torres, Chairman
of the California Democratic Party

ANCHORING
AN OCCUPATION and BUILDING A LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN AMERICA:

“Through
love of having children, we are going to take over.” AUGUSTIN CEBADA,
BROWN BERETS, THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY

Anchor Baby Power

La Voz de Aztlan has produced a video in honor of the millions of babies
that have been born as US citizens to Mexican undocumented parents. These
babies are destined to transform America. The nativist CNN reporter Lou Dobbs
estimates that there are over 200,000 "Anchor Babies" born every year
whereas George Putnam, a radio reporter, says the figure is closer to 300,000.
La Voz de Aztlan believes that the number is approximately 500,000 "Anchor
Babies" born every year.

The video below depicts the many faces of the "Anchor Baby
Generation". The video includes a fascinating segment showing a group of
elementary school children in Santa Ana, California confronting the Minutemen
vigilantes. The video ends with a now famous statement by Professor Jose Angel
Gutierrez of the University of Texas at Austin.

Today, Americans face
an unprecedented illegal immigration crisis facilitated by multi-billion dollar
drug and human importing cartels as well as corporations which are inducing the
invasion by aiding and abetting illegal aliens and using their influence on the
Executive Branch and elections to paralyze existing immigration laws supported
by over 80% of the American citizenry.

These events are not random and chaotic. Massive
illegal immigration is the result of non-enforcement and under-enforcement of
our existing immigration laws.

Supporters of illegal aliens love to claim that our
immigration system is broken. The system is not broken. Elite financial and
political business interests who could care less about the death and
devastation they are causing Americans have sabotaged the system. Their profits
continue to rise as they send the rest of America spiraling downward on a path
to anarchy and Third World quality-of-life conditions.

By using their influence to suspend our existing
laws, these globalist special interests have deprived all Americans of
political representation as well as their votes, their voice, and a functioning
Republic for which our flag stands.

When the laws of the American people – debated and
voted on by their duly-elected Congressional Representatives and signed into
law by the President– go intentionally under-enforced by the Executive Branch,
all of the principles, sovereignty, and self-governance of Americans are
derailed. The will of the American public, the existing laws, the US
Constitution, and the borders of our great nation are perceived as market
hindrances to the global elite. We the people of America are perceived as
peasants and subjects beneath the power of their influence.

The American public has spoken through our
lawmakers and in numerous polls. A super majority of Americans want our
existing laws enforced, those responsible for illegal immigration fined and/or
imprisoned, the borders secured, and illegal aliens deported from the United
States for many years or permanently. These fact remain, despite several
politicized polls which attempt to manufacture consent and make you believe
such views represent a minority.

The truth is that most Americans want the illegal
aliens to return to the nations of which they are citizens. The rallying cry
is: "Illegals Go Home!"

We could easily list 101 reasons why Americans are
upset about illegal immigration. Most are concerned about the 4,000+
preventable deaths of Americans by the criminal acts of illegal aliens on our
soil each year. No corporate propaganda will change the fact that most
Americans do not want to surrender or capitulate to the lawless masses rushing
into our nation.

No poll or politicized source is needed to prove
this point because the decision is based upon our nation's successful history
and basic common sense. The answer is based on something that every judge,
lawmaker, and even street thug knows. The penalties must outweigh the benefits
if you want to deter any action.

It is common sense and common practice in America
that for any law to be a deterrent, two important factors are in play. First,
the laws must be enforced, and second, the penalties for any crime must exceed
the benefits to those breaking the law.

It is truly amazing that we find ourselves as a
nation having to explain these basic foundations of law to corporations and
politicians in the year 2007 despite their existence since the dawn of
civilization! Can you imagine what would happen in America if the penalty for
robbing a bank was that you had to return half of the money you stole if, and
only if, you were apprehended for the crime? What if the penalty for car theft
was paying a $2,000 fine if you were caught with the stolen vehicle?

The answers are clear. Within a month, you would
not have a bank open in America and you would not be able to keep a car worth
more than $2,000 in your driveway for more than a week. How many millions of
people would quickly take up the careers of bank robber and car thief once the
rewards for the crime were higher than the penalty?

If American businesses and homes left their windows
and doors unlocked each night and robbers were merely removed by police when
detected – only to try again the next night – what do you think would happen?
If big, global businesses practiced the same non-enforcement of security
similar to the lack of border security and lack of immigration enforcement they
have facilitated for Americans, they would be out of business in a matter of
days or weeks. If they left their doors unlocked at night and just pushed
people back to the street, America would quickly descend into such chaos and
anarchy that we would be unable to sustain a population of 300 million. Our
population would take a hit similar to the impact of the Black Plague on
Europe, and we would quickly enter a new dark age.

Since illegal aliens can never afford to compensate
Americans for what they have taken, they must go. We do not need to go door to
door looking for illegals to deport in America. Attrition through enforcement
works. Illegal aliens are leaving the states of Georgia and Pennsylvania in
droves, not because they are enforcing the laws but because they have simply
announced they plan to start!
Unfortunately, the current state of affairs in America has illegals flooding in
by the millions each year and many law-abiding Americans fleeing the states of
California and Texas and many towns and cities in search of more safety and
security. Many Americans are on the run and finding few places left to run to.

The illegal aliens are sending a clear message on
the streets of Los Angeles and other major urban centers. They are saying:
"This is our land. White, black, and legal Hispanics get out!"

This is great news for the housing and real estate markets, Wal-Mart, and
McDonalds. They are growing the economy using rapid population growth. This is
great news for big corporations and bad news for Americans.

Attrition through enforcement will work. In fact, if
President George Bush were to announce on national television that America
would begin securing our borders and enforcing our existing laws in one month,
so many illegal aliens would leave America that Mexico would have to set up
refuge stations!

Another important reason that the illegal aliens must leave for the long term
is that they'll return to their home communities with a message for their
neighbors that their ill-gotten gains did not pay off in America. This is the
only thing that will stop, or slow, the flow. Deporting illegal aliens and
sending them packing is the only real way we can put a stop to this crisis.

The politicians in DC are very aware that Americans
want the illegal aliens to go. That is why their latest Scamnesty legislation
includes a “touchback”provision. Under these laws, the illegal aliens can hop
across the Mexican or Canadian borders where special "Ellis Island"
stations are set up for them to pay a fine, receive new documentation and be
back in the US within days or hours.

The lunatics advocating this plan are counting on Americans to be so stupid and
so gullible that they can say, "Look, the illegals left and walked back in
legally. Problem solved!" They are eager to pretend to accommodate the
American desires for the illegals to leave while quickly returning their slave
labor force to our nation.

They know that Americans want illegals to leave and
get behind a long line of legal immigrants waiting to enter the US, including
millions of people who have been waiting 5-10 years. These politicians and the
illegal aliens need to be shown the way to the back of the line. The back of
the line is back in the country in which they are citizens, 5-10 years down the
road behind all of the talented and law-abiding people who respect our laws.

If these traitorous corporations and politicians
succeed in setting up these Ellis Island stations for “Operation
Touchback," the revered symbol of Ellis Island will take on a new meaning
that Americans see with contempt and resentment. Ellis Island will become a
name associated with the horrendous betrayal of free Americans and the
deathblow to the American Republic. This is a symbol of America’s surrender and
the subjugation of all her people.

If we allow the politicians in DC to sign off on the
many Guest Worker, Temporary Worker, Path to Citizenship, Amnesty, Scamnesty
bills written by the US Chamber of Commerce, then no wall with an army on top
of it will stop the next 20 million from crashing down on our country. We will
have signaled that America is weak and will capitulate and accommodate.
Already, the word is out in Central and South America that they can come and
stay. Each time President Bush has opened his mouth about such programs, the US
Border Patrol reports massive spikes in illegal crossings.

Since there is literally no end to the stream of
illegals who want to be in America, this will be the end of America as we have
known it and as history has praised it.

In the past, when America has cracked down on
illegal immigration and the American people have signaled they want the
immigration brakes applied, the policies have worked. New laws written near the
turn of the 20th century greatly reduced the amount of immigration into
America. When Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower launched
large deportation campaigns in the 1950s and 1930s, illegal immigration slowed
to minuscule levels as a result.

Whether you agree or disagree with the decisions of
the past, these policies were part of the successful formula that have led America
to become the most opulent and successful civilization in human history.

While some argue that these enforcement measures were racist and that some
American citizens of different races were improperly deported at the time, we
now have the technology and methodology in place to assure that American
citizens and legal immigrants are not improperly affected by our immigration
enforcement efforts.

The difference in 2007 is that the globalist
corporations that have hijacked the American government want to stop the
American citizenry from applying the brakes this time. They have taken away our
ability to determine who can enter our nation and our ability to stop armed and
unarmed invasions as granted by the US Constitution.

To take away the self-governance of Americans is to kill the very thing that
has made us such a great and successful nation.

In a time of crisis like this, we must stand firm
on the principles that have made America an attractive and great nation. We
must stand firm on the rule of law. The law must be applied equally to big
corporations and illegal aliens alike lest we all become slaves subject to the
plans of masters instead of a free and empowered citizenry.

Illegal aliens and corporations must endure penalties for their illegal,
deadly, and destructive actions that exceed the benefits they gain from their
illegal activities.

The hour is late and it is time for Americans to
stand up and say with one voice...

No Amnesty! No Guest Worker! Secure our borders and enforce the existing laws!
Restore the American Republic!