THE OPTIONS OF CHOICE:Of global warming, penis envy, and the love for the nuclear age.

By Matthew Carter

So everyone is up in arms again on global warming.There's a new debate on each side every time wehear the subject. We are told "choices" of options.And no matter where you side on this situation.....I think we can agree that either way....we're screwed!

Personally I think more common sense in this matteris needed than science. I admit I have never seen AlGores movie, Nor have I read all of the sciencejournals regarding the warming. But I see the waythings are changing rapidly during a coincidentallyexplosive decade of this planets life.

Looking at some of these coincidences can makemany things seem attributed to the science thathas progressed us, and at times destroyed us.

But what mankind did before modern science wasalmost always done for understanding nature.

For instance in 2011 with the (Still ongoing andstill getting worse) Fukushima disaster many wonderedits unknown consequences. But a simple linking of afew things that happened progressively after it shouldbe brought to light.

The Pacific ocean has warmed in the East Asian area(We know why and now so does everyoneelse...finally) due to the massive constant leakingof the coolant (And the massive rains/typhoonscatching air born particles and eventually settlingthem as well) into the seawater there.

Then it seemed as their currents push north/south itled into the Arctic as well as Southwest as far asthe Bay of Bengal. It caused rather quick chainreactions of warming the water over the next yearenough that at one point it seemed as if there were5 typhoons lined up one after the other and when onedied another popped up at the back of the line.

The arctic circle, on the other hand had serious icemelt this past year compared to the previous fewdecades. This caused the southern flow of coolerwater to push south towards Americas west coastgiving it the warmest conditions in recorded historythis past Spring/Summer of 2012.

Now we look at the warming of the arctic combinedwith a massive and constant debris storm ofparticulates that are still to this day bombardingthe areas from Alaska, across Canada (And into theUS) and then Greenland , England, Russia, and so onback to West Asia all over again.The air born particles travel faster and can stayhung up for some time (Which is why we, for the mostpart haven't dropped dead thanks to the shorterhalf-life of the more toxic particles) and wouldsettle bit by bit.

Now we look at Canada, and especially Greenland. TheNorthern part of the US and Canada's summer thisyear was rather unique. From massive droughts, tolarge (Almost biblical) numbers of birds fallingdead to the ground. From extreme run off floods ofrapid ice melting. To (the one that is scariest ofall involving weather change) Greenland losing 95%of its glacier in less than a weeks time.

Hurricanes making it into New York, and almost toIceland several times. I have gone on long enoughand to get to the overall and obvious point.....

Since nuclear weaponry testing began it seems thatclimate change has also. I am aware that in the pastthe climate has had massive flux's in surfacetemperature, but it seems that since the late 1940'sthings have "Heated up" quite a bit on this planet.

With over 2,000 atomic, hydrogen, and nuclearweapons tested in the span of 60 years. Getting intemperatures of anywhere between 50 and 150 milliondegrees Fahrenheit. (A good correlation is that thesun presumably burns at 27.6 million degrees at itscore and its surface burns at 3.5 million degreesF.) Which over time can be rather detrimental to aglobal increase in temperature.

So why does no one ever think to equate these fewthings together?

-($hhhh)-

So here is a theory that science shouldtest....but does not. So because we are told onlytwo options exist... Man made, or not.... We nevertend to think of other options unless we reallystart to look at the bigger picture which is toughto do.

Either way the knowledge of fusion has only donedamage to mankind as a whole. The era of theignorant "Scientific Nuke Youth" of the earlytesting days as well as the "Politically PenileChallenged" of the late 40's up until current timeshas caused a facade of normalcy that is covering upthe dangers of our current, well, choices.

So I ask you this..."What next?""What now?"Because the concept of "What if" is no longer anoption in this world of bickering change.

Pointing fingers has done nothing. But if we finda reason as to why, it may just assist us in findinga solution to the popular question on all sides of thisdebated issue. Which is...

All posts and media uploads are expressed opinions of the contributing members and
are not representative of or endorsed by the owners or employees of Disclose.tv.

This site may contain copyrighted material. Members may make such material available
in an effort to advance the awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights,
economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We
believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in
section 107 of the US Copyright Law.