(ChristianGallery News Service, July 3, 2002)On the eve of Independence Day, the day
that celebrates the signing of the American Declaration of Independence,
while most American Patriots shudder at the thought of an international
tribunal with the power to eliminate the sovereignty of the government of the
United States of America, it must be said that the International Criminal
Court is a perfect place to finally see hard justice meted out to the legions
of abortionists and their blood flunkies who have taken the lives of millions
of American babies for untold millions of dollars US.

Are you shocked that such a thing
could be suggested?Then you haven't
paid attention to what the International Criminal Court is designed to
accomplish.

This is how an AP report on July
3, 2002, described the International Criminal Court, "…opening its doors
for operation in February 2003 in The Hague, Netherlands, …the new court will
deal with genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity…Crimes against
humanity include systematic murder or torture, rape and sexual slavery…"

According to the Declaration of
Independence we are supposed to be celebrating tomorrow, those who are
willing to act like unborn babies are human beings who are "…endowed by
their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; that among these are
Life…" have a perfect legal foundation in the International Criminal
Court to indict abortionists for "crimes against humanity."

True, the rules of the court
specifically say, "…Crimes committed before July 1, 2002, cannot be prosecuted…" But by today, July 3, 2002, the great majority of
abortionists in the USA
has already killed babies in the last three days, and will certainly be
prosecutable by this coming Saturday night, July 6, 2002, given the fact that Saturday is the
baby-killing day of convenience throughout most of the USA.

You scoff?You think it is impossible for abortionists
to be prosecuted at the ICC?

If you examine the International
Criminal Court's mandate and jurisdiction, you will see that, at least in
principle, it looks like it is designed to bring crimes like abortion to the
bar of justice, even when those activities have been declared to be perfectly
legal in nations, like the United States of America, that sanction them.

To prove the point, the AP report
continued, "The ICC will not supercede national legal systems and will
intercede only when national courts are unable to investigate or prosecute
serious crimes…It can try anyone from heads of state who knew, ordered or
condoned a crime, to average citizens, who cannot say they were acting under
orders."

In other words, the ICC will decide
what constitutes a crime, local government's decrees notwithstanding.And in the USA
or the rest of the world, neither the abortionists who butcher babies nor the
expectant mothers who put them under the butcher's knife can claim they were
acting under orders.There is nothing
that makes them exempt from being tried by the ICC for crimes against
humanity, except the changeable, dare we say it, even fickle will of the
people running the ICC.

Before you are tempted to dismiss
this idea as literally unthinkable, consider this: "The Rome
treaty establishing the court came into force on July 1, 2002, ratified by 74 countries and signed by
139. Among the notable supporters is the European Union. In addition to the United
States, Israel
also has refused to ratify the treaty. Other notable objectors include China,
India and Pakistan"

In other words, while there is
obviously significant opposition to the ICC from the major nuclear powers on
earth, the rest of the world is rallying behind the court because, without
it, there is no legal basis on earth for a weak, non-nuclear power, to defend
itself from the nuclear powers.The
only thing that protects the citizens of a non-nuclear powered nation is the
benevolent character of the nuclear powered nations.

Did the idea of any nation on
this earth being seen to be of "benevolent character" provoke a
snort of scorn from you?Then you know
why the great majority of nations on earth are working like beavers to bring
about the ICC.And they will continue
to work.If you want to see why the
ICC will continue to grow in power, look at how benevolent Israel looks these
days, or, for that matter, look at how benevolent the USA looks when guests
at wedding parties in Afghanistan (where scores of civilians were recently
vaporized for the crime of being at the wrong place at the wrong time) must
keep one ear attuned to approaching B-52s or American gunships.

The point is this: do not expect
the International Criminal Court to go away, and do not expect the Court to
exempt citizens of the USA
for long.For the foreseeable future
there is going to grow on this planet a judicial tribunal with the power to
put to death people convicted of crimes against humanity.

If we've got to learn to live
with it, we might as well put it to good use.

As the
Nuremberg Files web site said nearly four years ago, and still says
today, "One of the great tragedies of the Nuremberg trials of Nazis
after WWII was that complete information and documented evidence had not been
collected, so many war criminals went free or were only found guilty of minor
crimes."

The Nuremberg Files continued,
"We do not want the same thing to happen when the day comes to charge
abortionists with their crimes. We anticipate the day when these people will
be charged in PERFECTLY LEGAL COURTS once the tide of this nation's opinion
turns against the wanton
slaughter of God's children (as it surely will)."

In a world where bad news and
good news go hand in hand, the good news about the ICC is that the means are
becoming available to bring about justice for those children of God who have
been legally butchered in the United States of
America.The Nuremberg Files continues to be available to collect information
about the baby butchers working in your area.Please help us make certain we have the most recent information in the
Nuremberg Files.

Return to
Christian Gallery News ServiceThe United States objects to the idea that Americans could
be subject to the court’s jurisdiction if a crime is committed in a country
that has ratified the Rome treaty that established the court -- even if the
United States is not a party. Washington is demanding that American and other
peacekeepers from countries that have not ratified the treaty be exempt from
arrest and prosecution by the tribunal. The court’s supporters contend that
the Rome treaty provides adequate safeguards against abuse. First and
foremost, it will step in only when countries are unwilling or unable to
dispense justice themselves.