BTW- Everyone knows that Roy Cohn was chosen for McCarthy for window fressing since Cohn was Jewish and it served as a shield for McCarthy if accurate charges of his anti Semitism were bought up. Plus, Cohn was gay (he later died of AIDS), and J. Edgar Hoover had the power to blackmail Cohn is Cohn had any misgivings about serving as McCarthy's hatchetman (regardless of Cohn's beliefs about communism). It was a marriage of convenience for McCarthy with Cohn serving as McCarthy's version of Ernst Rohm. The fact is that most of the American military prison commanders and staff were Christian, not Jewish, and treated their SS captives reasonably well (this created a hatred of McCarthy in the US Army which eventually boiled over when McCarthy accused the JCS of being communist sympathizers- BTW- Eisenhower hated McCarthy too). McCarthy used the anti Jewish charges to appeal to German sympathizing conservatives in Wisconsin, the same people who supported the America First Committee and Lindbergh prior to US entry in World War II.

BTW- Everyone knows that Roy Cohn was chosen for McCarthy for window fressing since Cohn was Jewish and it served as a shield for McCarthy if accurate charges of his anti Semitism were bought up. Plus, Cohn was gay (he later died of AIDS), and J. Edgar Hoover had the power to blackmail Cohn is Cohn had any misgivings about serving as McCarthy's hatchetman (regardless of Cohn's beliefs about communism). It was a marriage of convenience for McCarthy with Cohn serving as McCarthy's version of Ernst Rohm. The fact is that most of the American military prison commanders and staff were Christian, not Jewish, and treated their SS captives reasonably well (this created a hatred of McCarthy in the US Army which eventually boiled over when McCarthy accused the JCS of being communist sympathizers- BTW- Eisenhower hated McCarthy too). McCarthy used the anti Jewish charges to appeal to German sympathizing conservatives in Wisconsin, the same people who supported the America First Committee and Lindbergh prior to US entry in World War II.

<quoted text>If I was I would admit to it.You're confusing me with Enzyte Bob.The reason Mao won is quite simple, the US stood by and watched as the USSR occupied Manchuria and took the arms of the surrendered Japanese and armed Mao.When we saw this, we cut off arms exports to the Nationalists, because the leftists in DC wanted the Communists to win.Alger Hiss was a Far East specialist, and he did a ton of damage.As to your "Chinese Ancestry" I give you a different name, you're an Anti White Racist that cannot stand the existence of the white majority in this country.

The USSR occuppied Manchuria because the US wanted Stalin to intervene against Japan. Would you rather that the US signed a truce with Japan and fought against Russia (and China) as a US ally ?(a belated pro Axis alliance that only the US extreme right would've loved- it would've made World War II partly their war). Believe it or not, the Chinese communist got most of their armaments from defecting (and often starving at that point) Nationalist units. Chinese communist military victories also helped a great deal. Nobody did more damage to the GMD than Jiang himself. Li Zhong Ren should've been in charge for that matter. All that could be done was evacuate garrisons since Jiang did a poor job at holding them at that point. Believe it or not, the Chinese communiosts had more military valuable intel on the GMD than Hiss, McCarthy or Birch ever had (i.e. the war was won or lost mostly by PLA efforts alone). Also, Stilwell and Carlson knew far more than a World War II nobgody like McCarthy ever did, they outranked him, were in China and saw and commanded far more combat operations than a dozen McCarthy types had seen in a lifetime. As for those who fess over "white majorities", the only whites I don't like are hostile white racist right wingers and fortunately, those aren't the majority of white Americans (and no, moist whites don't hold your views, especially intelligent and educated ones). Just curious, I bet you also believe that Ludendorff was "stabbed in the back" by Jews rather than believe that he was simply beaten by better allied generalship from Pershing, Foch and D' Esperey? If you believe that old lie, then you really do need remedial history lessons.

<quoted text>The USSR occuppied Manchuria because the US wanted Stalin to intervene against Japan. Would you rather that the US signed a truce with Japan and fought against Russia (and China) as a US ally ?(a belated pro Axis alliance that only the US extreme right would've loved- it would've made World War II partly their war). Believe it or not, the Chinese communist got most of their armaments from defecting (and often starving at that point) Nationalist units. Chinese communist military victories also helped a great deal. Nobody did more damage to the GMD than Jiang himself. Li Zhong Ren should've been in charge for that matter. All that could be done was evacuate garrisons since Jiang did a poor job at holding them at that point. Believe it or not, the Chinese communiosts had more military valuable intel on the GMD than Hiss, McCarthy or Birch ever had (i.e. the war was won or lost mostly by PLA efforts alone). Also, Stilwell and Carlson knew far more than a World War II nobgody like McCarthy ever did, they outranked him, were in China and saw and commanded far more combat operations than a dozen McCarthy types had seen in a lifetime.As for those who fess over "white majorities", the only whites I don't like are hostile white racist right wingers and fortunately, those aren't the majority of white Americans (and no, moist whites don't hold your views, especially intelligent and educated ones). Just curious, I bet you also believe that Ludendorff was "stabbed in the back" by Jews rather than believe that he was simply beaten by better allied generalship from Pershing, Foch and D' Esperey? If you believe that old lie, then you really do need remedial history lessons.

Put your Chomsky crap in paragraphs and I'll respond.

Your a dirty leftist with a hard on for Mao. Trash like you is exactly what I intend to have purged.

He also thought that Vietnam was a good idea too and it took Johnson to put some actual teeth into civil rights legislation (i.e. he wasn't an all knowing god). You do know that Jiang employed his old blockhouse strategy in Manchuria, a strategy of using relatively fixed defensive positions that were almost impossible to supply and defend against determined adversaries (i.e. Dien Bien Phu), especially prior to the advent of combat helicopters (I don't hear you blaming Eisenhower and Dulles for that loss- that would have been an equally stupid double standard). Believing politically right wing political narratives doesn't make you an expert on strategy (something that Robert E. Lee and A.P Hill found out), but only someone who wants an easy explantion for events without looking at the maps and doing actual research on the Sino-Japanese and Chinese Civil Wars in grad school as I had done. It takes more to know such events than listening to blowhard US politicians who had never been there or researched the subject. One might as well believe that Ludendorff was "stabbed in the back" (another great politically motivated lie done without knowledge of military maps, commanders,troop movements and logistics etc.).

Purged, How comically Stalin like of you (despite the political differences- you two are peas in a pod). You and none of your friends have the power to "purge" anything, just show up at rallies in sheets and stormtrooper gear with state permission to be mocked by the likes of ANTIFA and ARA who outnumber you 100 to 1. Leftist? You think I like either Jiang or Mao- that is comical. BTW- Mao's military brains rested with Zhu De (a veteran soldiers from the earliest warlord era period). Had Jiang been smart enough to let Li Zhong Ren to command, things might've been different. Wedemeyer approved virtually everything that Jiang's airpower would conquer all inpired mind wanted and that resulted in the complet catastrophe that Jiang's units suffered in the Ichigo Offensive of 1944. There was a price to be paid for poorly supplying and equipping ground forces due to paranoia of their political loyalties- Jiang distrusted his own army having warloed sympathizers who weren't 100% loyal to him alone, so he kept them weak and relied on Chennault and Wedemeyer for advice that wouldn't disrupt his worldview. Without properly equipped ground forces though, his airfields were overrun. Wedemeyer and Chennault airpower theory turned out to be useless on its own (this wasn't a tiny island like Spacteria). As for Chomsky, I don't recall him being a source expert regarding military operations in the SJ War/Chinese Civil War any more than you are. I'll have to check my books, citations and footnotes on that one. I don't rely on political celebrities for my primary source information as you do. You also didn't answer the Ludendorff "stabbed in the back" excuse question either. I expected about that much from a celebrity politician advocate (one that likely couldn't name most of those commanders off the top of his head without looking them up online (it shows you never reasearched those subjects very thoroughly).

Two questions: 1). Why did Albert Wedemeyer agree to leave China in 1946 if he confidently believed that he could achieve a fine job with improving the entire Nationalist army (i.e. Guomindang Lujun for those who actually can read Nationalist primary sources) then?2). How much time would it have taken to turn the entire Guomindang into a Y Force quality army (if you haven't figured out question #1 which even Wedemeyer did, you couldn't even hope to answer question #2).3). Why did Wedemeyer later lie when he denied that he was interested in a negotiated settlement between the Nationalists and Communists? Politics and political lobbying perhaps?(the earliest quotes are always the most honest ones).

<quoted text>Heard on the radios this morning that 80% of black males in Chicago cannot pass the felony test to get a job. Stunning!

How about the Obama Administration suing Dollar General and BMW for not hiring felons. Ha! I suggest Barry and Michelle open a company in Chicago and hire only felons and let us know how that works out!

<quoted text>How about the Obama Administration suing Dollar General and BMW for not hiring felons. Ha! I suggest Barry and Michelle open a company in Chicago and hire only felons and let us know how that works out!

and Pepsi also. if I own a company I will hire who I damn well please. and if there is a felony in the last five years you are not getting called. Nor will I call your sorrly self if you name is Lakeisha or some other such nonsense.

<quoted text>I se that you are a fanatical racist who only believes that whites should be in the US. In case you forgot, your side (the Nazis and their fifth columnist "America First" sympathizers) lost World War II. You lost, get over it.

Hitler was a progressive. Socialist progressives lost. You are a socialist progressive Eric.

You don't even know who won WW2, and we allow you to vote?

thanks for defining a massive problem in America........allowing sheep to vote.

<quoted text>Hitler was a progressive. Socialist progressives lost. You are a socialist progressive Eric.You don't even know who won WW2, and we allow you to vote?thanks for defining a massive problem in America........allowing sheep to vote.

Hitler was far right politically. You need time for some remedial history lessons, like the scathing review done of the moronic Jonah Goldbergbook book "Liberal Fascism" done by the History News Network for starters. I recommended you read their views, since your belief in Hitler being anything but far right politically ranks alongside stupidity such as those who deny the Rape of Nanking or the Holocaust.

<quoted text>Hitler was far right politically. You need time for some remedial history lessons, like the scathing review done of the moronic Jonah Goldbergbook book "Liberal Fascism" done by the History News Network for starters. I recommended you read their views, since your belief in Hitler being anything but far right politically ranks alongside stupidity such as those who deny the Rape of Nanking or the Holocaust.

<quoted text>Hitler was far right politically. You need time for some remedial history lessons, like the scathing review done of the moronic Jonah Goldbergbook book "Liberal Fascism" done by the History News Network for starters. I recommended you read their views, since your belief in Hitler being anything but far right politically ranks alongside stupidity such as those who deny the Rape of Nanking or the Holocaust.

Na·zi (näts, nt-)n. pl. Na·zis1. A member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, founded in Germany in 1919 and brought to power in 1933 under Adolf Hitler.2. often nazi An adherent or advocate of policies characteristic of Nazism; a fascist.adj.Of, relating to, controlled by, or typical of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

<quoted text>and you are a product of the failed public education system.you proved the point.clueless defines you.

So, By inference, does that make you a product of a failed private school or a failed student from either public or private school then? In any case, I am absolutely more educated than you are, especially regarding history. Your argument regarding the nature of the Naqzis proves it. If you want to argue further, why don't you go to the History News Network and argue the stupid "Liberal Fascism" book with experts on Nazi Germany who have earned Phd. degrees. They disagree with you as well. Your views on this subject are akin to the crackpots who argue in favor of young Earth Creationism debating actual scientists on the evolution issue.

<quoted text>Hitler was far right politically. You need time for some remedial history lessons, like the scathing review done of the moronic Jonah Goldbergbook book "Liberal Fascism" done by the History News Network for starters. I recommended you read their views, since your belief in Hitler being anything but far right politically ranks alongside stupidity such as those who deny the Rape of Nanking or the Holocaust.

Per create debate:

Well, it all depends on the country you are in. Conservatism means preserving the current state of the country. Liberalism is moving away from the current state.

Hitler opposed the ruling parties which tended to be Christian Socialists. National Socialism (shortened by political adversaries to Nazism) was Hitler's descent from the current ruling ideal; so in Germany Hitler was a Liberal.

If you look at it through America's stand point; Liberalism has more to do with Secular Humanist Socialism than it has to do with descent, while Conservatism has more to do with Moral Capitalism than it has to do with preserving ideals. With America being a short term Democratic Republic, the status of government is constantly changing. Since National Socialism encouraged strict government regulation over business and the Nationalization of Banks and health care, Hitler's views, in America, would still be considered closer to Liberalism.

The only Conservative part would be Hitler's encouragement of Patriotism and pride for your Nation. But if you look at Politicians, Democrats call themselves just as Patriotic as Republicans

<quoted text>Hitler was far right politically. You need time for some remedial history lessons, like the scathing review done of the moronic Jonah Goldbergbook book "Liberal Fascism" done by the History News Network for starters. I recommended you read their views, since your belief in Hitler being anything but far right politically ranks alongside stupidity such as those who deny the Rape of Nanking or the Holocaust.

Per create debate:

Hitler was a gun control advocate, liberals are gun control advocates. Hitler was pro-abortion, liberals are pro-abortion. Hitler was an animal rights freak, liberals are animal rights freaks. Need I say more?

<quoted text>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/NaziNa·zi (näts, nt-)n. pl. Na·zis1. A member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, founded in Germany in 1919 and brought to power in 1933 under Adolf Hitler.2. often nazi An adherent or advocate of policies characteristic of Nazism; a fascist.adj.Of, relating to, controlled by, or typical of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

Tell you what, Go to the History News Network and read their reviews of Jonah Goldberg's pathetic "Liberal Fascism" book. I guarantee you that it is only a tiny sample of how stupid most real historians really think his tripe is.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.