- Parts of this English version of this website was automatically translated. We are improving the translation every day. Please register to our forum and our hiking expert will love to answer any of your questions there -

Mattresses that carrying the father and son not necessarily weigh a lot. If it's so easy just soaked in volume and weight. Besides, the shells of Gregory (if I can) carrying well weights of 15-20 kgThey're not a company that's too clumsy weight. Give them continuous type of 1400 m and they start to think otherwise.

The binding rules of equipment outside the backpack are those:1) heavy equipment had to be tied down. Best in the bottom of the backpack.2) Middleweight equipment should be attached on either side and must be balanced with a similar weight on the other side.3) lightweight equipment can be attached above or behind casing, although the back is the best option.

Some notes.1) If you are a serious olterliit so you don't have too much need for bondage.2) diagram of yankele not refers to bondage outside casing, that that was the intention. 3) there's no such thing as a pod cannot be related things. If no-sew strips. The military call it "ipzurim"

(First mention that I wasn't one of the greatest moves, so my opinion should be considered suspicious lot):

-I ended up tying a mattress in four forms: at the top of the backpack might interfere with narrow balconies breaks and sometimes can be dangerous, sometimes difficult to access, Cap tends to get involved in the intricate, from the back of the neck.At the bottom of the backpack-n about Hebrew, pressing a prevent-it may be difficult for the backpack position, some pods may interfere with hanging.Over the pod-to transition, "kidnaps" less complicated, may make the access to Kangaroo if there is one, as well as hanging out (depending on the casing).Inside the pod-catcher, is used as a replacement back system protects the mattress against tangles, obtrusive, aisle was guarded.

Maybe you want to yankele perform another experiment. After kizzat and weight equipment, backpack could be very easy simple and cheap without back system fits perfectly for your needs. If so, you can save up to 600-700 g, opinion and over in Throop routes (which are required to carry more water and/or specifically for granddaughters.)

I frequently use it. Is a range, suited to the concept/trip and equipment used on routes which carried water and food for two days (before these routes taken backpacks larger than 36 liters).

I guess you're asking following shpzurim citation above. Although the over in Throop Customizing to my needs, then project light casing back-free it made minor routes (possibly get post on this subject after I finish all my experiments).

You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.