I remember this discussion, lazy vectors would also enable an
implementation of bytestring and (maybe) text only with unboxed vectors,
unifying it all:
type ByteString = Vector Word8
2012/7/12 Evan Laforge <qdunkan at gmail.com>
> he recent discussion of whether storablevector should be deprecated in
> favor of vector reminded me: vector supports storable arrays, but it
> doesn't support lazy arrays. While storablevector has lazy arrays and
> a builder, it doesn't support boxed types (it would be become misnamed
> if it did!).
>> So it seems the niche of boxed lazy arrays is unfilled. And if vector
> grew a lazy variant it could subsume storablevector and we could
> consolidate array libraries a little more. It seems a lot of Writer
> monad type stuff (logging etc.) could be made more efficient with a
> boxed lazy array builder, at the cost of rougher grained laziness.
>> Does such a thing already exist? I'd check hackage, but it's down...
>>http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://hackage.haskell.org/>> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org>http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20120712/2f723fa8/attachment.htm>