In reply to Mr. Handrich, it would appear that the
statement: "Some of the statements regarding evolution do not properly present modern evolutionary
thinking," and the statement: "Evolution . . . is treated almost completely as Darwinism unchanged" are
in substantial agreement.

The remainder of the first statement seems to imply,
as my review explicitly stated, not a criticism for,
quoting men of the 20's and 30's, but for quoting
them as "scientists of today." Both reviews refer to
the same development on pages 61 and 62 of the book.

There may be further semantic shades of difference
between the two quotations in Mr. Handrich's letter,
but the first seems merely to be saying that actually a
form of Darwinism is popular today, which is true;
while the other is concerned with the fact that if the
author believes such a "proof" as he advances, is the
strongest one against evolution, his conception of
evolution is not that held by present-day evolutionists.