In United States v. F.A., the client as charged by the US Attorney's Office for Conspiracy to Distribute 5 Kilos of Cocaine and Possession of a Firearm in Furtherance of Drug Trafficking. The client was apprehended during a drug sale and was found to have an illegal handgun and a kilo of powder cocaine in his residence. He faced a 10-year mandatory minimum sentence and an advisory guideline sentence of 12-14 years.

After several years of wearing the government down and based on the client turning his life around, Mr. Nobles was able to convince the Judge to sentence F.A. to only 5 years.

In People v. C.C., the client was charged with Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the 2nd Degree after her boyfriend shot off a pistol in the parking lot at a wedding. The handgun was unlicensed and illegal in New York, and since it belonged to C.C., she was indicted by the Grand Jury. If convicted, she faced a minimum of 3.5 years in prison.

After extensive negotiations with the District Attorney's Office, based on the unique circumstances brought to light by Mr. Nobles, his client pled to the REDUCED CHARGE of Attempted Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the 2nd Degree and received 5 years probation and NO JAIL TIME.

In People v. J.R., the client was accused of menacing another person who had unlawfully entered his property with bad intentions. J.R. was acting prudently and responsibly and was simply following the instructions of the 911 operator when he displayed, but did not discharge, his legally-owned shotgun. Despite the lawfulness of his actions, J.R. was charged with menacing.

Mr. DeCarolis presented these facts and circumstances as well as the justifiable actions of his client and the Judge moved to DISMISS THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

In People v. D.J., the client was accused of robbing a person on the street. The alleged victim testified at trial that his credit card was stolen and not returned.

Anticipating this testimony, Mr. DeCarolis was prepared with extensive proof that the credit card had actually been used by the accuser on numerous occasions after the alleged robbery. With the Prosecution's main witness' credibility destroyed, the Judge rendered a NOT GUILTY verdict at the conclusion of the bench trial.

In People v. J.E., the client was accused of having unwanted sex with a woman. J.E. maintained that it was consensual sex.

A vigorous defense including the client's testimony was presented by Mr. DeCarolis at trial. The proof presented by the defense was so overwhelming that the jury swiftly returned a NOT GUILTY verdict after only 10 minutes of deliberations.

In People v. S.D., the client was accused of possessing two stolen ATVs. S.D. maintained that he lawfully purchased the ATVs on CraigsList and had no reason to suspect the items were stolen.

Mr. DeCarolis established a compelling amount of evidence to support these claims. The evidence was ultimately put in front of the Grand Jury which found there was insufficient proof to charge S.D. with a crime. The Grand Jury DISMISSED ALL OF THE CHARGES.

In People v. J.P., the client was accused of driving while intoxicated based on his breath alcohol content of .14. This was well over the legal limit of .08 and well beyond the strict DWI plea bargain policy of the District Attorney's Office.

However Mr. DeCarolis was able to successfully negotiate a REDUCTION from the misdemeanor DWI to the violation DWAI to keep J.P.'s record clean and to save him from the stiffer penalties of a DWI conviction.

In People v. L.D., the client was accused of causing damage to another person's car.

A thorough investigation commenced by Mr. DeCarolis revealed video footage of L.D. more than ten miles from the scene of the crime at the exact time the accuser claimed L.D. broke her car windows. A copy of the video was quickly provided to the District Attorney's Office and the CHARGES WERE DISMISSED at the first court appearance.

In People v. M.H., the client was accused of participating in a gunpoint kidnapping with a co-defendant. The co-defendant admitted his role in the act and received a lengthy prison term. M.H. maintained his innocence and went to trial.

At trial, Mr. DeCarolis called the victim of the kidnapping to the stand as a defense witness to testify that M.H. was not involved in the criminal acts and just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. The jury quickly returned a verdict of NOT GUILTY.

In People v. D.M., the client was originally represented by another attorney and convicted at trial of shooting and severely injuring two people. He was sentenced to 40 years in prison.

Upon a successful appeal, D.M. was granted a new trial after serving less than five years of his prison term. Mr. DeCarolis represented D.M. for the second trial. After successful negotiations with the District Attorney's Office, Mr. DeCarolis was able to avoid another trial for his client and secured a REDUCED PLEA WITH TIME SERVED.