Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.

for some reason i can settle down at a job, but i don't want it to look that way. I have about 2.5 years of work experience, and have already worked at 2 Fortune 500 companies...now I'm looking to move to another. i really don't like job hopping, but this next one seems like a really great opportunity.

is it too much job hopping? should i stick out my current position for at least 1 year?

I can tell you this would absolutely be an issue if you were interviewing in my department. You would definitely be looked at as a flight risk unless you have a very compelling story for why you were looking to move again.

As Hopes mentioned, some jobs are actually more suitable for job hopping than others. It's better to stick it out for at least a year or two, but if this job seems even better then you could accept this job and spend a few years there. Though, I wouldn't recommend transferring again for at least a few years.

for some reason i can settle down at a job, but i don't want it to look that way. I have about 2.5 years of work experience, and have already worked at 2 Fortune 500 companies...now I'm looking to move to another. i really don't like job hopping, but this next one seems like a really great opportunity.

is it too much job hopping? should i stick out my current position for at least 1 year?

thanks

Stick with a given company for 2-3 years at a time until you get to mid-level management. Changing companies more often than every two years is showing future bosses that you will abandon them for a higher paycheck, and no one wants to hire someone who will be disloyal. In the corporate world, your reputation is your most valuable asset.

All the above are great explanations. I don't work in HR but I do work closely with them since i'm a supervisor. I would definitely be wary of hiring you if i'm looking for someone that wants a career not a little job you're not going to take seriously. But there's a fine line between working at one position to short and too long. I've been told if you don't grow in a company and have been in the same position for 5+ it's also an issue. Isn't that weird?

Employers want loyalty but how loyal are they to their employees right now? According to predicitions we are going to see a job hopping trend coming soon similar to the one the job market saw in the 90s with the Dot.com boom due to the number of Baby Boomers that will be exiting the job market. It might be your industry or it could that you are at the tip of the spear of a very near future trend. If this other company offers you a better deal and you like the company, and see yourself enjoying working there, I say take the offer.

Three to five years is probably a nice time to be at a company. If you can leave after then for a 15%-20% raise then it is probably OK. Do that a couple times and most likely you'd do better in the long run than sticking with one company for 40 years at a 3%-4% average increase.

Of course it is all relative. If the employer is looking at 10 resumes and they all have short time periods of work then it won't look odd. If 7 of the ten show longer work time periods it could stand out.

Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.