If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Please note that posts from new users are now moderated. If you have just joined this forum and post a new message it will be held in the moderation queue until a member of staff approves it. Please be patient and our staff will review your submission as soon as possible.

Why are schools killing our children's natural ability to speak a second language

Have you found yourself in the situation where you feel frustrated that your children have been learning a second language for years and still can not speak it?
I find myself asking the same question on numerous occasions.
My ten-year old niece has been learning English for almost 4 years and I struggle to see any progress. I found her speaking ability very poor. She can not string together one proper sentence. All she can do is to give me some sentences that were memorized for her English projects!! I am not saying she is not bright enough as she can pick up the English easily while holidaying abroad,what I am trying to point out is that schools strictly follow coursebooks and do not encourage children to speak in the English class.
Schools and not only schools should take a different approach to teaching a second language.
It is a shame that schools do not work with the fact that children have the natural ability to learn a foreign language and pick up any accent easily up to the age of 13, as research and studies show.
Why for goodness sake, are schools killing our children's natural ability to speak a second language in order to tick the box (coursebook rules)
All I want is to raise awareness of the wrong approach of teaching a foreign language (not only children).

I can't speak of my children (as I don't have any), but I can speak of my personal experience.
In the Swiss German speaking part of Switzerland we start learning French in 5th grade.
I studied French for eight years and I'm not even able to introduce myself properly.

In fact after one single year of studying English I spoke that language better than I spoke
French after those eight years. Of course English is a lot easier in the beginning and it
has the same roots like (Swiss) German so that might be a reason.

However I think the actual problem wasn't the language but the way it was taught to us.
I remember the first French lesson. I was so excited. I wanted to learn another language.
But it wasn't fun. It was plain boring, I hated writing stupid and monotonous grammar sentences.
The same over and over again and I still couldn't remember the most simple rules.
I lost interest never got it back.

I think the biggest misconception is to put all the students into one pot and expect them to be
on the same level. And this doesn't only apply to second languages but to all the classes.

After a year or two it all went over my head. I didn't understand a thing anymore because
I didn't understand the basics. If they put me in a class where I had more time to get the basics
right, maybe I would speak French today.

Of course the opposite is also the case. The last two semesters I didn't attend to one single English class,
because I can't learn anything new there.

The system doesn't focus on individual strengths but instead focuses on collective mass education
that has the opposite effect most of the time.

In Australia, it isn't particular discouraged. We have numerous indigenous students, or students from non-English speaking backgrounds. Both languages are encouraged. However, not all schools here promote a second language for learning. There isn't as much of an importance of teaching English from such the basic level. At least not often. I don't see the point in promoting the development of a second language, while so many students/children can't use their native language correctly. (That is very obvious is Australian schools)

I'm not a teacher yet, but I am studying a Bachelor of Education with an English Literature major at Charles Sturt University, in NSW, Australia.

It may be an exaggeration, but the monolingual, especially those whose first language is not an international one, are at a disadvantage. Someone said that the monolingual are the illiterate of today- again, overstating things, but making a point.

Why for goodness sake, are schools killing our children's natural ability to speak a second language in order to tick the box (coursebook rules)

They are "killing" other natural abilities as well, first and foremost, creativity. That's quite understandable though - you can hardly expect anything original off the peg. The human factor is the Achilles' heel in any system and education is no exception - basically, any effective course is based on the personality rather than anything else, and the more the course is structured the less freedom (read - responsibility) is given to the teacher. With the increasing globalisation, it doesn't really matter what country you are in: most teachers are snowed under with tests and paper work and those who don't comply are merely squeezed out. Here, the educational system comes hard on the primary school children, however those few who manage to survive usually perform well further on.

Originally Posted by Tdol

It may be an exaggeration, but the monolingual, especially those whose first language is not an international one, are at a disadvantage. Someone said that the monolingual are the illiterate of today- again, overstating things, but making a point.

Absolutely. Unfortunately, fairly many people are happy to stick to one language only - life is too short, they say, and there are other things to be done - rather embarrassing for a language teacher