Of Ostriches and Rebels on The Hard Road to World Order

The
myriad manufactured crises which afflict humanity today, from the
imminent threat of WMDs to the perpetual 'War on Terror' creating a
never ending “Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians”,
from the Financial Crisis and Pandemics to Global Warming and weather
changes putting mankind in perpetual crisis over one thing or another,
and perhaps even Alien invasion or other
intergalactic catastrophes soon to imaginatively visit earth, are merely
the successive Hegelian mind-fcks, ahem
the “acts” and “deeds”, of
making current affairs “look like a great ‘booming,
buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous
description of reality,”.
Each new ‘booming, buzzing confusion’
provides the new enabling pretext for inching the world one baby-step
closer towards the Global Governance of the Planet. This is the only non
fiction of modernity --- the drive towards one-world government --- the
rest is all myth fabrication and perception management to get the
public mind to consent to world government as the only solution to these
global crises.

Gideon
Rachman of the Financial Times wrote in his oped of December 08, 2008:

'I
have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to
take over the US. I have never seen black helicopters hovering in the
sky above Montana. But, for the first time
in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is
plausible. A “world government” would involve
much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity
with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The
European Union has already set up a continental government for 27
countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a
currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the
ability to deploy military force. So could the European model go
global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might. First, it
is increasingly clear that the most difficult issues facing national
governments are international in nature: there
is global warming, a global financial crisis and a “global war
on terror”. ... But – the third point –
a change in the political atmosphere
suggests that “global governance” could come much sooner
than that. The financial crisis and climate change are
pushing national governments towards global solutions, even in
countries such as China and the US that are traditionally fierce
guardians of national sovereignty.' (Gideon Rachman, And now for a
world government, Financial Times, December 8 2008 ; Also see Zahir
Ebrahim's Response
to Financial Times Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government',
December 11, 2008)

Mr.
Rachman accurately reflected the immense momentum today towards world
government which many a globalist had been working toward across
generations rather openly, often boldly
proclaiming that:

'We
shall have World Government, whether or not we like it.
The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by
conquest or consent.' (James Warburg in 1950 to the US Senate, cited
in Project Humanbeingsfirst's Monetary Reform Bibliography)

The
EU Council President, Herman Van Rompuy,
only 59 years later on November 19, 2009, openly admitted in his
first press conference in Brussels after being appointed president,
that finally, “2009
is also the first year of Global Governance”:

'We
are living through exceptionally difficult times. Financial crisis
and its dramatic impact on employment and budgets, the climate crisis
which threatens our very survival --- a period of anxiety,
uncertainty, and lack of confidence. Yet these problems can be
overcome, by a joint effort, in and between our countries. 2009
is also the first year of Global Governance with the establishment of
the G-20 in the middle of financial crisis. The climate conference in
Copenhagen is another step towards the Global Management of our
Planet. Our mission, our presidency is one of hope,
supported by acts, and by deeds.' (press conference November 19, 2009
http://youtube.com/watch?v=QEqFtVrAgSo
)

Mr.
Van Rompuy too was accurate in his message of hope that Global
Governance is “supported by acts and by deeds”.

But
just what might these be?

A
Council on Foreign Relations author had rather holistically outlined
the underlying character of these supporting “acts”
and “deeds” way back in the middle-stages
of their planning-execution cycle in April 1974 as follows:

'In
short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built
from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It
will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to
use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end
run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will
accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.

Of
course, for political as well as administrative reasons, some of
these specialized arrangements should be brought into an appropriate
relationship with the central institutions of the U.N. system, but
the main thing is that the essential functions be performed.

The
question is whether this more modest approach can do the job. Can it
really bring mankind into the twenty-first century with reasonable
prospects for peace, welfare and human dignity? The argument thus far
suggests it better had, for there seems to be no alternative. But the
evidence also suggests some grounds for cautious optimism.' (Richard
N. Gardner, The Hard Road To World Order, Foreign Affairs April 1974
issue, pages 558-559)

Herman
Van Rompuy's message of hope at the
completion stages decades later was merely the cross-generational
echo of Richard N. Gardner's “prospects for peace, welfare
and human dignity” that had been long sewn “bottom
up, rather than from the top down” such that to the
uninformed public, it would always “look like a great
‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’
famous description of reality, but an end run around national
sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than
the old-fashioned frontal assault.”

The
blood-drenched transformation stage that we find ourselves in today –
the wreckage of civilizations – is truly “Between Two
Ages”. That brilliant description is not mine, but the
title of Zbigniew Brzezinski's seminally self-serving 1970 book which
[presumably] got him appointed as the Executive Director of David
Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission. There are more than a dozen
Trilateralists and CFRs in President
Obama's Administration too, pushing the banksters' globalist agendas
finally to fruition across multiple fronts simultaneously.
The money behind them, at least in the United States, is primarily
the Rockefellers' who own the majority stake in the New York Fed,
which in turn largely controls the Federal Reserve System. In Europe,
the money is primarily the Rothschilds' who control all the world's
private central banks (including America's Federal Reserve and
international lending-policing agencies such as the World Bank IMF
tag-team and the WTO) with complex interlocking relationships among a
closed-knit tiny fraternity who exercise their will upon
international banking and global finance and thus upon all nations of
the world, through their largely unknown Bank for International
Settlements (http://BIS.org)
located in Basle, Switzerland.

Entirely
coincidentally of course, BIS is located in the same secretive
banking capital where Theodor Herzl had earlier made his notorious
Jewish manifesto, Der Judenstaat public in the First World
Zionist Congress in 1897 to set the public stage for the creation of
the exclusively Jewish state of Israel in 1948. Also entirely
coincidentally, the British Empire had gratuitously issued its famous
1917 Balfour Declaration in the name of Lord Rothschild, the
principal owner and founder of the international financial system who
had controlled the Bank of England since Waterloo. And again entirely
coincidentally, America's entry into World War I was facilitated
after the founding of its own 'Bank of England', i.e., the Federal
Reserve System principally by Paul Warburg, the banking fraternal
twin of Lord Rothschild in whose palace the Treaty of Versailles
was signed after World War I to enable the British Mandate over the
lands of historic Palestine.

These
remarkable coincidences have today made the Rothschilds the most
revered family name in Israel. Some call them the King of the Jews –
and to live up to that Solomon-ly title,
the Rothschilds have architected, financed and built the Jewish
state's principal hall of Justice, the Israeli Supreme Court in
Jerusalem. The Jewish State today enjoys the unparalleled privilege
of an “Iron Wall” that none can breach. The Rothschild's
frankenstein can with brazen impunity
exterminate, assassinate, and bomb, to the applause of the world
leaders (see 'Pamphlet: How to Return to Palestine'). And yet,
strangely, the Rothschild's role in seeding and orchestrating the
affairs of the modern world is consistently downplayed almost
universally. No media, no academic, no scholar, no historian, no
dissent-chief, no corporate executive, no
billionaire on Forbes list, the Forbes list itself, and of course no
politician and world statesman, dare utter that name publicly –
and so long as they don't, they can say anything else they want.
Elusive power such as this is not a figment of someone's imagination (see 'Pamphlet: The Invisible House of Rothschild').

Prof.
Carroll Quigley was permitted to openly state the following in his
1966 book Tragedy and Hope, and his controlled revelations
which continued that tradition of downplaying the name of the
Rothschilds, only came on the heels of the free-wheeling Eustace
Mullins' well-documented exposé
of how the Federal Reserve System in the United States was
conspiringly created by forces representing
the same globalist banking elite, and he had not spared the
Rothschild name; this was followed by a series of books and
documentary films in the 1970s by many others including Gary Allen,
W. Cleon Skousen, G. Edward Griffin, Antony
Sutton et. al. These passages from
Quigley's 1200 page ode to the International bankers underscores the
base axiomatic reality upon which the entire web of control of the
globalists is fabricated:

'The
powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less
than to create a world system of financial control in private hands
able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy
of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled
in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in
concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and
conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for
International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland; a private bank owned
and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves
private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like
Montagu Norman of the Bank of England,
Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist
of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank,
sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury
loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of
economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative
politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.'
(Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, Chapter 20, page 324)

'It
must not be felt that these heads of the world's chief central banks
were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not.
Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant
investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and
were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive
financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment
bankers (also called “international” or “merchant”
bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own
unincorporated private banks. These formed a
system of international cooperation and national dominance which was
more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their
agents in the central banks. This dominance of investment
bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and
investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world.'
(Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, Chapter 20, page 326)

The
following observations made in 1970 by W. Cleon Skousen in his
extensive commentary on Tragedy and Hope are entirely empirical
today:

'The
real value of Tragedy and Hope ... [is the] bold and boastful
admission by Dr. Quigley that there actually exists a relatively
small but powerful group which has succeeded in acquiring a
choke-hold on the affairs of practically the entire human race. Of
course we should be quick to recognize that no small group could
wield such gigantic power unless millions of people in all walks of
life were “in on the take” and were willing to knuckle
down to the iron-clad regimentation of the ruthless bosses behind the
scenes. As we shall see, the network has succeeded in
building its power structure by using tremendous quantities of money
(together with the vast influence it buys) to manipulate, intimidate,
or corrupt millions of men and women and their institutions on a
world-wide basis.' (W. Cleon Skousen, The
Naked Capitalist, pg. 6)

Gary
Allen argued matters in such an elegant style in 1971 in his short
book None Dare Call It Conspiracy, that the logic of the
highlighted sentences in the passages quoted below even elicited a
long chuckle from a most cynical MIT trained Silicon Valley engineer
friend of mine who has designed dozens of microchips and is not
easily given to levity on current affairs:

'Most
of us have had the experience, either as parents or youngsters, of
trying to discover the "hidden picture" within another
picture in a children's magazine. Usually you are shown a landscape
with trees, bushes, flowers and other bits of nature. The caption
reads something like this: "Concealed somewhere in this picture
is a donkey pulling a cart with a boy in it. Can you find them?"
Try as you might, usually you could not find the hidden picture until
you turned to a page farther back in the magazine which would reveal
how cleverly the artist had hidden it from us. If we study the
landscape we realize that the whole picture was painted in such a way
as to conceal the real picture within, and once we see the "real
picture," it stands out like the proverbial painful digit.

We
believe the picture painters of the mass media are artfully creating
landscapes for us which deliberately hide the real picture. In this
book we will show you how to discover the "hidden picture"
in the landscapes presented to us daily through newspapers, radio and
television. Once you can see through the camouflage, you will see the
donkey, the cart and the boy who have been there all along. Millions
of Americans are concerned and frustrated over mishappenings in our
nation. They feel that something is wrong, drastically wrong, but
because of the picture painters they can't quite put their fingers on
it.

Maybe
you are one of those persons. Something is bugging you, but you
aren't sure what. We keep electing new Presidents who seemingly
promise faithfully to halt the world-wide Communist advance, put the
blocks to extravagant government spending, douse the fires of
inflation, put the economy on an even keel, reverse the trend which
is turning the country into a moral sewer, and toss the criminals
into the hoosegow where they belong. Yet, despite high hopes and
glittering campaign promises, these problems continue to worsen no
matter who is in office. Each new administration, whether it be
Republican or Democrat, continues the same basic policies of the
previous administration which it had so thoroughly denounced during
the election campaign. It is considered poor form to mention this,
but it is true nonetheless. Is there a plausible reason to explain
why this happens? We are not supposed to think so. We are supposed to
think it is all accidental and coincidental and that therefore there
is nothing we can do about it.

FDR
once said "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it
happens, you can bet it was planned that way." He was in a good
position to know. We believe that many of the major world events that
are shaping our destinies occur because somebody or somebodies have
planned them that way. If we were merely
dealing with the law of averages, half of the events affecting our
nation's well-being should be good for America. If we were dealing
with mere incompetence, our leaders should occasionally make a
mistake in our favor.

We
shall attempt to prove that we are not really dealing with
coincidence or stupidity, but with planning and brilliance. This
small book deals with that planning and brilliance and how it has
shaped the foreign and domestic policies of the last six
administrations. We hope it will explain matters which have up to now
seemed inexplicable; that it will bring into sharp focus images which
have been obscured by the landscape painters of the mass media.

Those
who believe that major world events result from planning are laughed
at for believing in the "conspiracy theory of history." Of
course, no one in this modern day and age really believes in the
conspiracy theory of history -except those who have taken the time to
study the subject.

When
you think about it, there are really only two theories of history.
Either things happen by accident neither planned nor caused by
anybody, or they happen because they are planned and somebody causes
them to happen. In reality, it is the "accidental theory of
history" preached in the unhallowed Halls of Ivy which should be
ridiculed. Otherwise, why does every recent administration make the
same mistakes as the previous ones? Why do they repeat the errors of
the past which produce inflation, depressions and war? Why does our
State Department "stumble" from one Communist-aiding
"blunder" to another? If you believe it is all an accident
or the result of mysterious and unexplainable tides of history, you
will be regarded as an "intellectual" who understands that
we live in a complex world.

If
you believe that something like 32,496 consecutive coincidences over
the past forty years stretches the law of averages a bit, you are a
kook!'(Gary Allen, None Dare Call it Conspiracy, 1971,
Chapter 1; Also see 'Some
Dare Call it Conspiracy! Are you among them?')

Can
today's handful of rabble-rousing moral activists with their
chest-thumping internet-jihad and the occasional street-dance
protesting with loud drum-beating, fight such a nemesis that is not
only legally endowed with an infinite supply of money conjured out of
thin-air, but whose controlling power pervades all public and private
institutions from universities to businesses to governments to
non-profit supra-organizations like the United Nations and none dare
talk about it without being called a 'kook'? To genuinely reverse
this unstoppable impetus towards global management surely requires an
order of magnitude different strategies and tactics other than
blaring into bull-horns and publishing books and eloquent websites
don't you think?

To
an engineer's eye attuned to building real systems rather than merely
talking about their future possibility in glossy brochures, it
requires mass mobilizations and the common man's commandeering of
structures of power worldwide to shut down the world. No food on the
store shelves, no garbage picked up, no containers unloaded, all
civic services stopped, etc. A global strike that demands the
juridical hanging of the oligarchy, the nationalization
of their amassed wealth, and the
un-privatization of usurped
public commons worldwide.

Apart
from the fact that all such effective mobilization requires money,
global organizations, time to build them up, labor unions and
political institutions which can mobilize the rank and file for
common cause, unfettered access to media to carry the message, and
intellectual strategies and tactics which can launch a thousand cuts
of no less overwhelming convolution than what the oligarchy conjures
up to overwhelm the public senses, there are also no masses to
mobilize. More importantly, there are no un-compromising leaders to
lead them.

With
no resources outside of the institutional
parameters of the status quo for any emerging leadership to be
effective in rebelling against those very institutions, and all
legalisms and security apparatuses calculatingly stacked in favor of
the establishment's own ruling paradigms – the unfettered
promulgation of hegemony of the oligarchy fronted by the 'national
security state' with its colossus
military-industrial-academe-media-congressional-juridical-executive
complex – what can even courageous leaders do when even the
brains of the President of United States, the mightiest superpower on
earth, is not safe from being blown to smithereens when it becomes a
threat to the status quo? (See 'The Eight Bay of Pigs of JFK' in Jim
Douglass' November 2009 talk “JFK and the Unspeakable”
at COPA, Dallas, based on his book
)

Random
public riots in the streets out of individual desperation does not,
and will not, cut it. Ineffectual rowdyism is in fact, the calculated
tactical plan of the globalists themselves. Because, destructive
riots enable them to play their final fait accompli inducing trump
card – martial law! And the FEMA detention camps on military
sites have already been made ready to welcome many an unwise
malcontent! (See 'Why bluff martial law')

Those
attempting to uncontrollably rile up the public anger with bull-horns
in the style of Television Network's Mad Prophet of the Airwaves
(Network, 1976 Hollywood movie):

'Well,
I am not gonna leave you alone. I want you to get mad. I don't want
you to protest, I don't want you to write to your congressman because
I wouldn't know what to tell you to write. I don't know what to do
about the depression and the inflation and the Islamofascists and the
crime in the street. All I know is that first, you've got to get mad.
You've got to say “I am a human being god dammit, my life has
value”. So, I want you to get up now, and go to the window,
open it, and stick your head out and yell: “I
am mad as hell and I am not gonna take this anymore”',

cannot
not know this.

While
it has today become next to impossible to tell fabricated dissent
from manufactured consent, and with reformed cats piously trying to
represent the silly mice, the underlying political science basis of
the ubiquitous social engineering
which employs this “cognitive infiltration” is
documented in the two reports 'Manufacturing Dissent: The Master
Social Science', and 'Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory'. Also see: 'Did
David Ray Griffin and Steve Lendman miss the real purpose of Cass
Sunstein's “Conspiracy Theories”?'

As
one can glean in these aforementioned analyses, there is effectively
no dissent today that can impact the status quo. And establishment's
systems are already in place to ensure that it does not happen
either. Only narratives are permitted to exist. And the narrators are
often generously rewarded too, with many even openly seeking and
accepting their harvest of peace prizes and other glamorous
accolades, lucrative appointments and tenures, from the same empire
which they ostensibly oppose in their prominent dissent! I am told
that there is a very generous single Biblical word for them:
hypocrite. Not being divinely inspired, mine are of course
considerably less generous.

Never
mind waking up the sheeples. The genuine “ostrich”
activists, the “quite gallant and graceful-looking people”
as H. G. Wells described the lot (see quote below), themselves
need to wake up to the grotesque reality first, and take accurate
cognizance of the battlefield the way it really is.

The
way things stand today – see the reality-check in 'Why Not Be
An Ostrich?' – without birth-panging radical transformations to
dissent-space and the concomitant emergence of a focussed global
resistance, Global Governance of the oligarchy is fait accompli. That
is simply a factual statement with no emotional syntactic sugaring
applied.

The
myriad manufactured crises which afflict humanity today, from the
riveting Wikileaks intrigues to the
perpetual 'War on Terror', from the Financial Crisis to Global
Warming and the Carbon Credit scams, and perhaps even Alien
landings/sightings and/or intergalactic catastrophes soon if Project
Camelot has been accurately primed, are merely the successive
Hegelian mind-fcks, ahem the “acts”
and “deeds”,
of making current affairs “look like a great ‘booming,
buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous
description of reality,”.

Each
new ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ provides the new
enabling pretext for inching the world one baby-step closer towards
the Global Governance of the Planet in what has been officialized
under the United Nations umbrella called United Nations Agenda 21 (
http://tinyurl.com/UN-Agenda-21-ZahirEbrahim
). See Project Humanbeingsfirst
Publications
Index
for reports on each one of these “acts”
and “deeds”
to verify for yourself how every global crisis, always fabricated and
calculatingly exacerbated, has been harvested to legislate new global
laws in the name of fighting these crises, effectively causing the
pre-stated Machiavellian “end run around national
sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece”.

Today,
many an officialdom will openly admit that national sovereignty
has already become a myth. But they will also only attribute this as
a reaction to the crises – the war on terror, the financial
crisis, the global warming, the global pandemics, etceteras,
just as the EU president proclaimed in his first press conference in
2009! What will be tomorrow's catastrophic crisis that “will
make Sept. 11 pale by comparison”, as was
self-servingly presaged by former US president George W. Bush on Feb.
13, 2008 warning the world of impending super-catastrophic terrorism,
that will be hailed as the final inevitable reason for cementing
world government? (See What can make 'Sept. 11 pale by comparison')

And,
pathetically, all that the “malcontent” and
“graceful-looking people” can do, just like the
“history's actors” accurately predicted that we
shall do, is study it:

'We’re
an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while
you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will —
we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can
study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re
history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to
just study what we do.' (Ron Suskind, New York Times,
Oct. 17, 2004)

More
tragically, our tortuous zeitgeist was also
accurately presaged even before most of us were born:

'When
the struggle seems to be drifting defiantly towards a world social
democracy there may still be very great delays and disappointments
before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless
people – will hate the New World Order – and will die
protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its
promise, we have to bear in mind the
distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite
gallant and graceful-looking people.' (H. G. Wells, The
New World Order, page 127)

Isn't
that where all the world's rebels precisely stand today, blindly and
ineffectively resisting a fait accompli in false hopes? With most of
the world's 'untermenschen' happy-happy in hope and voluntary
servitude waiting for a savior? (See 'Happy-Happy in Hope and
Voluntary Servitude')

But
perhaps it is not because of false hopes. That is only for ostriches.

Perhaps
it is really that elusive spirit of the swashbuckling rebel, Captain
Rhett Butler of Gone
with the Wind which
inspires this lot.At least in so far as his penchant
for supporting lost causes after they were truly lost was concerned.
“Why?”,
retorted Captain Butler to Mrs. Hamilton as
he gallantly abandoned his unrequited love in the middle of the road
to go join the Confederate Army after Atlanta had been completely
burned to the ground by Sherman and his northern soldiers: “maybe
it's because I have always had a weakness for lost causes once they
are really lost.”

Admirable,
perhaps even heroic by grandmotherly
standards. But hardly any cause for indigestion for the henchmen at
the CFR and the EU Council who, under the “iron-clad
regimentation of the ruthless bosses behind the scenes”,
are striving to bring us “reasonable prospects for peace,
welfare and human dignity” in the twenty-first century.

Nevertheless,
rebels don't necessarily always measure
their categorical imperatives in the same way. For many among the
'untermenschen', to simply exist is to resist. And obviously no
self-delusion is involved there. For others, to merely survive the
daily oppression and daily burials of their loved ones with their
dignity and mental faculties intact, is unsurpassed heroism. Such
earthly struggles when wholly circumscribed by moral dimensions, even
when motivated by narrow existential self-interests such as the
self-defense of one's own loved ones, or the safeguarding of one's
own sanity, is perhaps best captured by the pithy wisdom from the
Islamic tradition narrated in my 'Muslim's
Voice: Why we endeavor even when it appears futile!':

'When
the Prophet Abraham (in the Orientalist's
spelling) was being thrown in the fire by the tyrannical ruler
Nimrod, all creation was in tremendous angst. Even the stones spoke
out against the tyrant. Every moral creature endeavored to the rescue
of Prophet Ibraheem (AS) to put out the fire. To the extent that a
tiny bird picked a droplet of water in its minuscule beak and started
to fly over the fire.

An
Angel of God asked the little bird:

“Surely
you are not going to put out the fire with that droplet(!), and
surely the high flames will consume you! – what do you think
you are doing?”

The
tiny bird replied:

“yes,
you are right, and I know that my tiny droplet will not save the
Ulul-Azam (Great Prophet) of God. But I bring to the endeavor of
standing up to this evil tyrant whatever I am capable of, and this
tiny droplet is all I am capable of.”'

The
rebel is not an ostrich. He and she is that tiny bird with the tiny
droplet in its beak.

Reprint License

All
material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with
full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety,
unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity,
provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part
of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its
main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license
violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images,
quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on
non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research
use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes
against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly
commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external
material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair
use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html.
Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you
are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your
request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents
in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the
documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You
are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from
other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.