When MSNBC stops defending Hillary, that is a signal in and of itself. More and more with Trump now beating Clinton in many national polls, and polls showing Bernie can beat Trump (or at least be close enough that they can steal another election), it seems to reason that the Establishment would drop Hillary in favor of Bernie. Something easy to do, with just two simple words from Obama to his Justice Department: "Indict now". -W.E.

FIRST, if you have not followed the “Tripwire Series” this update might take a while to fully digest.There are key indications the real presidential decision-makers have shifted.

I would strongly suggest you watch this video before continuing, and remind yourself that Andrea Mitchellis Alan Greenspan’s wife (this is one of the “keys” moving forward).

The video is Mika Brezinski outlining the latest State Department report on the Hillary Clinton E-Mail Scandal: “it feels like Hillary Clinton is lying”…

Last year, against tremendous opposition, we outlined what would
happen if two specific occurrences took place: #1) If Donald Trump
secured the GOP nomination; and, #2) If Hillary Clinton crossed a
particular threshold and appeared “unelectable”.

What we stated then, eerily remains today.

If Trump won (he has), and it appeared Clinton was too weak to defeat
him (looking possible), the power-brokers who ultimately control U.S.
elections (Wall street) would move to replace Clinton with an alternate
candidate. They’d have no choice.

Who the alternate candidate doesn’t really matter. The reasoning we
have continually evidenced within expanded explanations about the
Congressional Legislative Agenda being dictated by Wall Street
interests.

♦ The influences who control the legislative agenda have already put
in place, convinced and paid for, the politicians needed to advance
their interests (the legislative priorities).

♦ Those interests don’t care about who occupies the White House so
long as that occupant is incapable of derailing their objectives.

♦ There is only one current candidate who is a risk to that Wall
Street goal, Donald Trump. The second candidate, be it Hillary or
Bernie, does not represent the same risk.

♦ Bernie cannot disrupt the legislative agenda because he is external
to the party structure who currently control the construct (Leader
McConnell and Speaker Ryan).

♦ Only Donald Trump can disrupt the agenda because he would also
carry an electoral mandate and allegiance with elements inside structure
of the party apparatus.In essence Trump can block them, Bernie cannot.SIGNALS – What we are now seeing is a shift:

Also, Senator Elizabeth Warren is attacking Donald Trump. When we
outlined the risk to Clinton’s nomination, Elizabeth Warren was
predicted to join the Bernie Sanders ticket as the Vice-President
pick. They need a ticket which can defeat Donald Trump.

Remember, with republicans in control of the House and Senate, and
with the hundreds of millions already spent to secure the agenda items,
only Donald Trump represents the risk.There are literally trillions of dollars at stake.

But this is the Clinton’s we are talking about. Nobody puts the
Clintons in the corner and dispatches them to the land of irrelevance
without a fight, NOBODY. And when the Clinton’s fight – there are no
boundaries; nothing is ever not possible.

So how do the Clinton’s fight back and try to regain their positioning?Answer: They use all of their relationship leverage within the media to try and gain their footing back. In 1993 Jake Tapper was Press Secretary for Congresswoman Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky. She is Chelsea Clinton’s mother in law.