US Crackdown 3.0 (April 2011)

As you are probably aware, the US-facing poker sites of PokerStars, FullTiltPoker and UB/AB have been blocked by the United States Department of Justice.
PokerStars and FullTilt have stopped accepting US players and there are widespread reports that players have been experiencing difficulty withdrawing funds.
As visitors to PokerPulse will remember, this was not unexpected and we have warned players to avoid sites accepting US players and sites with open issues with the US DOJ
(see US Action April 2011 below).

The developments in the US will not have any impact on PartyPoker or on any of their other brands,
because PartyPoker exited from the US market after the law changed in 2006 and has made its settlements with the US DOJ.

PartyPoker is the clear and safe choice for online poker. And most importantly, PokerPoker has excellent capacity to provide
unparalleled speed of play in a reliable and safe environment using systems that have been developed and tested over the last 10 years
as witnessed by PokerPulse who has been tracking PartyPoker online play since 2001.

Popular online sites, that accept US players and which you should AVOID because of possible future DOJ action resulting in your account being frozen for long periods of time (or just gone for ever), include:

X

Bodog Poker

X

Full Tilt Poker

X

PokerNetwork

X

PokerStars

X

Prima Network

X

UltimateBet / Absolute

X

World Online Network

US Action, April 2011

A visit to PokerStars and several of the other "you should AVOID" sites saw:

The Matt Richtel story about the April 2011 seizure
falls apart when author interviews self-apptd expert Walters, who seems to think there are jurisdictions that would not
surrender citizenry accused of gambling offenses in the U.S. Ha! I’d like to see even the smallest fiefdom attempt to
escape America’s most formidable Web of treaty-backed provisions known as the global financial crimes network.
Then there’s that old bugaboo – the WTO challenge to U.S. online gambling provisions, which ultimately supported Prohibition 2.0.
The new poker-playing president has little or no interest in Internet gambling – for a lot of political reasons, no doubt.

Some of our comments and outreach related online gaming industry issues. And starting in March 2009, monitor PokerPulse updates @pokerpulse on Twitter (http://twitter.com/pokerpulse).

Blog January 21, 2009 -- Could this mean the end of Prohibition 2.0? Senator Obama: I read the other day that Senator John McCain likes to gamble. He likes to roll those dice, and that's OK. I enjoy - I'm making a confession here - I enjoy having a little friendly game of poker myself once in awhile.Republican Illinois Senator Kirk Dillard remembers a few of those games!

To: ministre@msp.gouv.qc.ca, August 2008 -- ...The federal justice minister has advised me to seek your counsel regarding the extent of your discretion to apply (or not) federal gambling prohibitions in Kahnawake. (See enclosed e-mail of Aug. 13/08). According to the minister, "The general scheme of the gambling provisions of the Criminal Code is to prohibit all forms of gambling, except those specifically permitted by the Code. While Parliament enacts the gambling provisions found in the Code, the prosecution of these offences is the responsibility of the provincial attorneys general." ...

While Parliament enacts the gambling provisions found in the Code, the prosecution of these offences is the responsibility of the provincial attorneys general. If you have not already done so, you may wish to write to Mr. Jacques P. Dupuis, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Quebec, who is responsible for the administration of justice in Quebec. His office is located at Louis-Philippe-Pigeon Building, 1200 route d’Église, Floor 9, Québec, Quebec G1V 4M1

To Canadian Minister Nicholson and MP Cullen, April 2008 -- PokerPulse trackers were delighted to read a recent account in the corporate media of 'discussions' you're having in Ottawa regarding the possibility of regulating an online gambling industry here in Canada - one that might be open even to taxpaying Canadians with no history of weapons, armed stand-offs or cross-border smuggling. We were wondering, will Quebec Mohawks and one or two or the eastern racetracks continue to set unwritten Canadian gambling rules, or might 'interested others' like us be included among the 'stakeholders' in those discussions?

To WSJ EU Ediition, April 2008 -- We've been tracking for some time now developments in the slow-burn trade dispute between Antigua and the U.S. over America's remote gambling ban, which many in the industry now refer to and not affectionately as Prohibition 2.0. Many of us are still catching our breath after the wildly disappointing result obtained in the arbitrator's report at Christmas when panelists slashed Antigua's claim of $3.4 billion - a figure arrived at by a legion of actuaries - to a paltry $21 million using a bizarre, utterly unprecedented legal approach we call the Four-Flusher Fantasy. (more...)

To Variety, March 2008 -- It's a good day when an international trade law story such as yours makes it to Variety... What I hope most fervently is for the sinfully lucrative American film industry to be sufficiently outraged by the harm the U.S. position has caused Antigua and indeed the world that industry leaders will grow some guts and start lobbying the U.S. Trade Representative aggressively to stop restricting trade in gambling. (more...)

Kahnawake Gaming Op Ed Piece-- In the wake of residential school settlements that have literally taken out organized religion in Canada, there may be understandably little sympathy for First Nations claiming a special and exclusive right to such a lucrative business. But if they do the homework to show their business is both eco-friendly and an important traditional feature of a unique culture, Mohawks may be able to persuade the feds to open up Internet gambling in Canada once and for all. (more...)

The poker room and poker network rankings are based our observations of the real money hands and tournaments played in recent weeks. A #1 indicates the most active room/network. A room without a #1, #2 or #3 means PokerPulse does not estimate activity for that room/network.

The letters in the ranking have the following meaning:

PP in the rank column indicates the room/network is operated by and owned by a publicly traded company.

P in the rank column indicates the room/network is either operated by or owned by a publicly traded company.

Pp in the rank column indicates the room/network operator is a publicly traded company and some of the rooms on the network are owned by publicly traded companies.

x indicates that neither the room/network owner or operate is a publicly traded company.

_ indicates a to be determined status for public / private ownership.

Click here for more information on using rankings to chose an online poker room.

U.S. Citizens Please Note: The information contained at PokerPulse.com is intended for educational and entertainment purposes only. Any use of this information in violation of federal, state, or local law is prohibited.