Saturday, January 31, 2004

Women are sick. They are mentally ill. One of the characteristics of mental illness is stereotyping. What that means is that one woman is sick in exactly the same way as another. You see the same patterns over and over again.

Our culture is involved in a complex scam trying to cover up this situation, particularly from young men. The worst case scenario is the totally oblivious guy who gets himself into a bad situation. However, most guys know something is wrong, but just can't put their finger on it because of the brainwashing. At first, they figure they just met some wacko and then try again. When the next one turns out just the same, they start to investigate if something is wrong with themselves (pleeeennnty of asshole relationship experts are willing to feed this). After awhile they come to the amazing conclusion that, yes, something is wrong with the entire female population. But they only know that something is wrong. And they don't know that "something" can be mapped out and understood.

Every time we examine a case, we learn a little more about the specifics of that "something". Understanding the nature of a thing gives you power over it. Because humans have free will and exercise it in every single facet of our existence, you can never change another. Only they can change themselves, and only by choosing to do so, with no influence possible from anyone or anything. However, that doesn't mean you can't get things you need from them or have to put up with their bullshit. Understanding that "something" gives you vital information on how to 1) get what you want and need from women and 2) how to prevent them from causing you undue hardship.

Friday, January 30, 2004

As women age, their ability to get men plummets. Paradoxically, their standards go through the roof because they know the next one will be the last one (and they have been led toward an attitude of entitlement due to their past experiences with men). Then, their ability to get a man drops to zero, just about the time a woman hits 40. The inability to get the type of man they think they deserve and being left with no future and zero options, leaves a woman incredibly bitter and used up. The irony is that a great many men would at least fuck them (nobody wants them as a wife), but because of the bitterness, they opt out.

You always see the same thing. A 40ish woman, average looks, who hates men, but wants the top 1% quality wise... and has nothing to offer.

Thursday, January 29, 2004

When a woman orgasms, it has little to do with what the man is doing to her and mostly to do with what she is doing inside her head.

A woman can easily orgasm with any man she chooses to. If the woman you are with isn't orgasming, it's because she chooses to see you as someone who isn't sexually stimulating, hence the need for “romance”. It is extremely important to understand that (within limits) how sexual you appear toward a woman isn't under your direct control. You can slim down, lift weights and even get cosmetic surgery and she won't be attracted. She will, temporarily, be attracted to a guy who makes himself unavailable. And she definitely will be attracted if you make yourself inappropriate in some way (leather jackets, tattoos, earrings and other bad boy image stuff are favourites).

Part of this is the hilarious situation that often a woman you barely know orgasms like a banshee at the slightest stimulation, and then becomes completely frigid later on in the relationship. Often they will try to mask this as "issues with intimacy". But what is really going on here is she is purposefully shutting down her own sexual impulses because she no longer thinks she needs to please you anymore.

This isn't true with men. A woman who makes herself look in certain stereotypical ways will make herself generically attractive to all men. And a woman who screws you with ardour and skill, will definitely make you orgasm.

The point here is frigidity in women is a big warning sign. It is intentional passive-aggressive behavior that is just a part of the bigger issue of disrespect. If a woman starts having "sexual problems" like this, dump her immediately, for two reasons: The next one won't (i.e., there is absolutely nothing wrong with the way you are fucking her) and, the woman you just dumped seems to have no problem orgasming with the biker/meth dealer living next door (even though, he is so drugged out of his mind, he can barely get it up).
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext

Wednesday, January 28, 2004

The sad fact of the matter is most women lead sad, pathetic little lives. Their life choices leave them intensely unhappy failures.... and feeling very unloved. Many completely screw up their lives creating a hopeless situation of intense suffering. A lot of the more vindictive behavior on their part is to punish someone else for the pain they are feeling. Large numbers end up alone in their later years. Half of women over 40 haven't even been laid in the last year. As far as making sense from and evolutionary point of view, they are hardly picking up good genes. Originally, their behavior did make sense. They exhibited clustering around the men with the good genes (ie, intelligent, powerful men with resources got laid like fiends, especially the leaders). This ensured that the alpha males paired off with the alpha females and the beta males paired off with the beta females. Everyone else just sorta whored around. Unlike primates, humans exhibit pair-bonding. Most everyone mates and bears children, except the small number of losers and deviants and most of the structure and resources go towards the more valuable members of society. You had occasional breeding on the sly, but usually only on the lower rungs of the pecking order, for variation. Cuckolding was punishable by death when it involved alphas or the more valuable betas. Humans also engaged in staggering. This means that all men want the younger, child bearing women, except when they are paired off. When a man's woman croaks, he takes another, but not of the same age as him... only from child bearing age. This made sense too. It forced women to pair off when they were fertile... or miss the boat so to speak.

Today, westernized women act completely different than in normal cultures and how women have acted for most of our species' history. They still exhibit clustering, but they do it now around the guys with bad genes! They ignore the guys with the good, survival oriented genes.... strength, intelligence, virility, family orientation etc. Now, it's the omega male (criminal) and to a lesser extent the zeta male (weak loser) who are sought after. The former to indulge perversions, the latter to exploit for money. Also, women resist pair bonding (lol, while men still exhibit staggering) and child birth, putting it off until the end of their reproductive cycle. Often, they end up with nothing and no one. The results of this crap are plain for everyone to see... feral children who are quite frankly, genetically weak and inferior in various ways, growing up without fathers and few resources. Divorced women with no partner and no chance of getting one ever again. The whole situation is sick and unnatural and is slowly weakening us as a people.

That is the whole point of the feminist agenda. Most of those women are nuts and also inferior. They tend to be ugly, combat boot wearing deviants on the very bottom of the pecking order. Their hope is that by weakening us all, their position will rise. It just ain't gonna happen. The only way to rise in the pecking order is to be more important to society... to provide something, preferably something rare. The assholes provide nothing and take quite a bit. They are unworthy of respect in every way. One day, people will wake up to this fact and put them in their place. Not yet. But, it's getting there.

Tuesday, January 27, 2004

Women want sex much more than men, not that they succeed at getting sex or having a good sexual relationship much more than men. You guys are forgetting that women are freakin’ nuts. And that insanity puts serious neurotic restrictions on her sexual expression.

An example. I had a woman friend that became more and more insane as she got older, eventually resulting in my expelling her from my life. Before that, I noticed that about once a month, she would pick up a couple of random guys at a bar (strong hormonal component). She was quite fond of telling me all about these wild sexual escapades. But I also knew her through several "relationships". They all followed the same pattern. The more intimate and close she became with a man (especially if he moved in with her), the more she lost sexual interest... to the point of becoming frigid. But she would still go out and pick up random guys on the sly. At one point I told her how I would never put up with that from a woman. To which she quipped, "Well, what the hell would you do about it?" Without skipping a beat I said I'd dump her skank ass.
My point here is the sex drive in this person was so strong that she really wasn't in control of it and her neuroses and being a miserable a-hole in general prevented her from channelling that into something positive (it actually got more and more negative as she got older). A lot of guys I know have run into this problem. She's a fiend in the sack until they get to know each other. Suddenly, she is frigid. But all these sexual skeletons keep falling out of her closet.

The high desire for sex is something I've observed over and over again with women. There are two things going on here. The first is that women are going out of their way to paint the picture that men want sex while women need to be convinced grudgingly give in to sex (plus baby, if not with me, you ain't gettin' anywhere else, because most women don't want it either). These are lies, specifically designed to inappropriately get the upper hand in relationships. The other thing going on is women are sick. They want sex lots more than men but are sexually dysfunctional. They have bizarre things like intense anxiety if they feel sexual attraction for the wrong (wrong being some weird random thing) man. They get angry if the "wrong" man approaches them because they feel guilty about that attraction and even more guilty about randomly fucking one of them on a regular basis (a situation they have little to no control over). Some are so anxiety ridden that they rarely have a man in their life and when they do, the conflicts and weirdness quickly drive him away.

This is why you have fundamentalist Christian babes who think sex out of marriage is amoral, but who regularly have some random guy strap them to an A-frame and whip the fuck out of them. A lot of similar stuff is going on in our society.

But none of this really matters. What matters is that no matter what women want you to think, there are a great many women around you who are all hot and horny for you. They hide it. It requires the ability to recognize and elicit subtle signals to tell who they are. It requires timing and the ability to known when and exactly how to strike when the iron is hot. There is never a reason to think that a woman is doing you a favour by having sex with you (requiring you return the favour in a manner other than sexual) or to think you can't walk away from a bad situation and within a reasonable period of time, get another one. If a woman is having sex with you, she is doing it because she likes sex, specifically with you. Don't be fooled and don't tolerate her neuroses. If she starts to lose interest, dump her. That lack of interest has nothing to do with lack of interest in sex. It has to do with bad behavior and lack of respect for you. It magically disappears 10 seconds after you are gone. This is VERY important to understand about women. Frigidity has NOTHING to do with lack of sexual interest. It has to do with lack of respect (you will see plenty of this in all other aspects of your relationship). Don't put up with that crap.

Monday, January 26, 2004

The liberal a-holes really did take the Moynihan report to heart. (Reporting on the destruction of Black society due to fatherlessness). What they are doing, they are doing on purpose.

Every time this issue is measured, it comes out the same. Broken homes with the father absent = fucked-upness. Happy homes with a strong man as the father = happy, well adjusted children. Every single time. And yet, you have various groups creating policy on weird theories with no basis in observation, often very superficial in their reasoning. The theory is just a thinly veiled excuse to cover an agenda. Of course, they don't believe their own nonsense. They know full well what they are doing. They are just hoping that their theory will go unobserved because it quickly becomes revealed as bullshit and lies by anyone with the skill and knowledge to assess it.

The best way to handle this is to, first, identify who they are specifically. A good example is how you can see that the entire profession of psychology has ceased doing what it is supposed to do (treat mental illness) and is instead acting as the manipulative arm of something sinister. For God's sake, absolutely forbid your woman from seeing a therapist (boy, did I learn this the hard way).

The second thing to do is to say no to them. Marginalize them. When a vote comes up to divert time money and resources to them, vote no. Repeat this basic pattern over and over again until the people involved no longer matter. Don't listen to their arguments and bullshit. Pay attention to what is directly observable and can be reasonably inferred from that. If what a person wants, works, keep it. If it doesn't, kick them to the curb.

Do not accept attempts to argue away what can plainly be seen by everyone. A theory that contradicts reality is wrong, and probably only exists to fool you into doing something stupid.

Senator Daniel Moynihan: “By 1983 the poverty rate reached its
highest level in 18 years….The principal correlate had been the change in family structure, the rise of the female-headed household.” (Family and Nation, p. 95)

Here are some of the observed effects of removing a father to the position of a visitor in a child`s life.
"Based on our clinical experience with a number of latency aged and adolescent girls whose parents divorced during their oedipal years, we postulate that particular coping patterns emerge in response to the absence of the father, which may complicate the consolidation of positive feminine identification in many female children, and is observable during the latency years. We illustrate both the existence of these phenomena and implications for treatment:
1. intensified separation anxiety
2. denial and avoidance of feelings associated with loss of father
3. identification with the lost object
4. object hunger for males." "In an earlier study by Kalter and Rembar at [Children's Psychiatric Hospital, University of Michigan], a sample of 144 child and adolesce atients, whose parents had divorced, presented [for evaluation and treatment] with three most commonly occurring problems:
63% Subjective psychological problem (defined as anxiety, sadness, pronounced moodiness, phobias, and depression)
56% Poor grades or grades substantially below ability and/or recent past performance
43% Aggression toward parents Important features of the subgroup of 32 latency aged girls were in the same order: 69% indicating subjective psychological distress 47% academic problems
41% aggression toward pa ts. Clinical Observations on Interferences of Early Father Absence in the Achievement of Femininity by R. Lohr, C. g, A. Mendell and B. Riemer, Clinical Social Work Journal, V. 17, #4, Winter, 1989

“Virtually every major social pathology of our time: violent crime, drug and alcohol abuse, truancy and scholastic failure, unwed pregnancy, suicide and other psychological disorders – all these correlate more strongly to fatherlessness than to any other single factor.[1] According to the National Fatherhood Initiative, “Children who live absent their biological fathers are, on average, at least two to three times more likely to be poor, to use drugs, to experience educational, health, emotional, and behavioral problems, to be victims of child abuse, and to engage in criminal behavior than those who live with their married, biological (or adoptive) parents.”[2] The overwhelming majority of prisoners, juvenile detention inmates, high school dropouts, pregnant teenagers, adolescent murderers, and rapists all come from fatherless homes. Children from affluent but separated families are much more likely to get into trouble than children from poor but intact ones, and white children from separated families are at higher risk than black children in intact families. The connection between single parent households and crime erases the relationship between race and crime and between low income and crime[3].”
[1] Attempts to attribute these behaviors to poverty or racial discrimination have been refuted by studies that control for these variables. See Urie Bronfenbrenner, “Discovering What Families Do,” in David Blankenhorn, et al. (eds.), Rebuilding the Nest: A New Commitment to the American Family (Milwaukee: Family Service America, 1990), p. 34; Ronald Angel and Jacqueline Angel, Painful Inheritance: Health and the New Generation of Fatherless Children (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993), p. 188. Even left-wing scholars concur: Norman Dennis and George Erdos, Families Without Fatherhood (London: Civitas, 2000).
[2] Horn and Sylvester, Father Facts, p. 15.
[3] Elaine Ciulla Kamarck and William Galston, Putting Children First (Washington: Progressive Policy Institute, 1990), p. 14.

Sunday, January 25, 2004

Being an asshole doesn't even work in the short term. Sure, alternating hot and cold will sometimes get a woman obsessed (the same way random interval reinforcement gets people hooked on gambling). But, just being a total jackass gets you nowhere. Some "game" guys say different. Based on what they say, they obviously have no real experience with women. What does work, and what these and a lot of inexperienced guys get mixed up with this, is being evil. If you are the type of guy who gets drunk and acts like a jackass in public, expect a lot of dateless nights. But if you are the type of guy who sells drugs, or gets drunk and beats a woman so badly she ends up in the hospital, or you've been arrested numerous times, or you are in a gang, these are the things that get you laid. That's not even close to being a normal thing and there is a very high price for aligning yourself with that intensely negative vibe.

If any guy thinks he is going to be successful with women by being a jackass, think again. Being a jackass is just the other side of the coin of being a wuss. The defining element here is lack of control... lack of power. Yeah, that'll get you laid... not. This is why it appeals to wusses so much. They think they can get their way by being an obnoxious wuss instead of a snivelling wuss. But they still haven't expended the effort or cultivated the power to not be a wuss (i.e. to affect the world rather than being blown around by it). Bad habits are the hallmark of that brand of nonsense.

Note that this is a hell of a lot different than being assertive or even aggressive in the face of a woman's bullshit. Women will call that behavior (i.e. not giving her her way) asshole behavior, but it's not. Most people who do this are very nice about it and treat people with love, dignity and respect, when they deserve it. They just don't take any baloney and they insist on things being on their terms. The typical asshole does none of these things. Instead, they treat women like shit, and allow women to treat them like shit in return. Their behaviour opens the door to the woman's behaviours. The assertive man does the exact opposite. He neither gives nor allows poor treatment. He never explains and never negotiates either. It's either his way or the highway. Women say they don't like that as a way to try and get away with something. But every normal woman loves that about a man.
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext

Saturday, January 24, 2004

I keep saying it, but nobody really believes me (until they experience it for themselves). Women ignore objective signs of worth and status and instead make decisions on attraction mostly at random. Signs of worth... tall, looks, money, muscles, status, don't change greatly who is attracted to you. I'm undecided if fame actually does make more women attracted or if it simply makes the women who like you anyway, hunt you down in an obsessive way. What it does affect is their aggressiveness. Don't build muscles and a hot body in the gym (ditto for making cash, wearing cool clothes etc.) thinking it will get you a certain type of girl (or worse, a specific girl) because it won't (much to my dismay). You do it because it affects your own confidence and it makes the women (the same exact women who were already attracted to you), more attracted. More of them reveal themselves to you, and they make it easier for you to get them.

Also, and this is important, because women make these decisions at random, they often have difficulty judging their looks, status, whatever, compared to yours. What matters is social proofing. No matter how ugly you look, if you date a lot of women, good looking women will find you attractive. This also works in reverse. On the dating websites, all the girls on them are what you would call "hard to place". They rarely get dates, which is why they are online. Since you are also online, they assume you are the same way. It doesn't matter if you have all these signs of being much higher status than her. All she looks at is the social proof that you are also an online loser, like her. If you go, "Pffft, lady, I'm out of your league," they will freak. If anything, they assume your status is much lower than hers.

I think this is one of the biggest reasons to avoid online dating. All the girls are the dregs, who think you are beneath them, no matter what. It's a lose/lose situation.

PreviousBonecrker IndexNext
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.“…Women may have happy ideas, taste and elegance, but they cannot attain to the ideal. The difference between men and women is like that between animals and plants. Men correspond to animals, while women correspond to plants because their development is more placid and the principle that underlies it is the rather vague unity of feeling. When women hold the helm of government, the state is at once in jeopardy, because women regulate their actions not by the demands of universality but by arbitrary inclinations and opinions. Women are educated – who knows how? – G.F. Hegel
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Further Reading:
.Bonecrker #34 – Online Dating – Not!

Friday, January 23, 2004

"Badboys" are pussies, not alpha males. The easiest way to tell if a man is alpha is to observe if he has the respect and cooperation of other men, especially other men in general (i.e. he has power and respect in society, not just socially). You very rarely see a "badboy" meet these criteria. When you do, it's usually an alpha fooling around to get laid.

Alpha males don't usually get the chicks. They get the best chick and she tends to stick around and beat the shit out of any other girls who come around.

The multiple sex partner thing is the omega male's gig. You usually see all sorts of deviant behavior going on in addition to this. Although he is getting laid, he is powerless in relationships as well as every other aspect of his life. No one respects him, not even the psycho chicks who screw him.

Alpha's get snapped up quickly. Beta males screw a lot early in life while women are competing over them, and then settle down. Omegas can't form stable relationships. And Zeta males rarely get laid. Most people are betas.

Humans aren't apes. We have a different mating strategy than them. Women compete for the best man they can get (at a very young age) and then stick with him for life. He sometimes cheats, but not to reproduce. She never cheats. Everyone pairs up. Whenever you see people straying from this paradigm, fucked-upness starts to happen. This is what is happening with women. They are becoming more and more omega. Their clustering around these men is not a normal thing, which is why it is so fucked up in all other ways.
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext

Thursday, January 22, 2004

QUOTE: "People say they are attracted to confidence, but how often do you meet a confident person who doesn't tend to act like a jerk? It's all too common for mere confidence to cross the threshold into arrogance. But that's what people want."

This is where you fall into the trap that the average powerless person does. You assume that people who act like jerks are powerful. They are just as powerless as you, they just express it in a different way. Both tigers and mice are powerless. People play victim and victimizer for the same reason. Confident (confidence is based on power) people do neither. Quite literally, for no other reason than they don't have to. Going from a not confident to a confident person involves only one thing... cultivating power. Do all of those things likely to bring you power. Work out until you are strong. Mind your business until you are rich. Eliminate useless behaviours. Build your kingdom of people and resources until it is unassailable. Be competent in everything you do. Those are the things that bring confidence. Nothing else does.

QUOTE: "Whether we like to admit it or not, we are all the products of our own little environments. We have been moulded and shaped by those people who have been a part of our lives. Our mothers created our physical bodies, but our peers created who we really are. It was our peers who taught us how to behave, because it is our peers that we want so much to be with. We want their acceptance, we want to belong, and the only way we can belong is if we become like them."

People are most definitely not the product of their environment. We are the products of the choices we make, every single moment of every day. Change happens the very moment you decide I'm going to be different, today, right now, for this specific thing. Do enough of those little specific changes and the change generalizes. Almost nothing else except a person’s free will and choice has the power to determine a person’s behavior. Once you understand and know how to use this, everything else falls into place.

Part of the process is when a person understands that there is a tendency to seek approval and acceptance from others. However, that tendency isn't normal. It's neurotic. Once you know this, you can make huge gains in your life by examining it for behaviours that are approval seeking... and stopping them. People (especially women) manipulate you through your approval seeking behaviours. If you eliminate them, they have nothing to grab hold of. Also, eliminating these will make you feel much, much better about yourself. Approval seeking, even if you get the approval, makes you feel bad. But, like smoking, even though it is bad for you, it's addictive. You need to be ever vigilant for backsliding with this. But the effort is well worth it.
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, January 21, 2004

Who pays? The real issue here is not who pays. It's the lack of love, dignity and respect for you on the part of American women. That's what causes the resentment. The issue of who pays is determined by custom and the status of the woman you are with and your relationship with them. A high status woman whom you have a causal relationship with pays her own way in our culture. The bigger the difference in status and wealth between you, the more likely it is that you should pay. The more formal the relationship, the more likely you should pay.

The reason you should pay is rooted in old traditions and has to do with who you are in relation to your woman. If you are equals, she pays. If you are a patron and she is a peasant, you pay. Most people in the US are of the same socioeconomic class (even if there is a large difference in salaries). For man to pay, he is acting macho... like he is the patron and she is the peasant. This is a normal thing for men to act dominant with women. It's part of the complicated mating dance that humans do... you assert your role as protector, provider, and Lord of the Manor. And that role has rights and responsibilities. Paying is one of them.

But there is a huge ass problem. The problem is women in this country aren't interested in a legitimate relationship with you and have no real feeling toward you. What they do is use the custom as a way to exploit men for money and goods. They go a lot farther with it as a means to actually exchange sex and intimacy for money... that's prostitution... and the women who engage in it, in all cultures, are rightly at the very bottom of social classes... because it's deviant.

So, who should pay? My answer is you should dodge the question entirely. Never go anyplace that costs money. Go places like walks and picnics and parks. Jokingly tell her that you expect for her to pay. Dump any woman that constantly sniffs around for gifts or expects you to take her to expensive places.

There is also a third issue here. Women look at a man one of two ways... as a lover or as a provider. They make men who are providers wait for sex. You don't want to be seen as a provider. Instead, you should focus on women that have decided to have sex with you right away and focus on having fun and being intimate with you. Later on, if you want to be serious with them, you can shift your role to one of provider. But if you allow them to look on you as a provider you can't change into a lover later on. This is extremely important to understand, because you only get the one chance in the beginning to establish what you are to her. However, in other countries where the contempt and exploitation of men isn't present, you could probably safely be the provider with the right woman. But my instinct says you should still present yourself as a lover instead, until you have a mature, steady, sexual relationship for quite some time.

"[The woman] doesn't have to do anything more on the date than show up... don't make it easy for him... he has to do all the work." -- Ellen Fein & Sherrie Schneider, The Rules

"It's just chivalrous... it's nice of you to care about his finances, but remember he is deriving great pleasure from taking you out." -- Ellen Fein & Sherrie Schneider, The Rules

"'The guy should pay [for dates]...' says [ESPN SportsCenter anchor Rich] Eisen..."Why is that?... 'Hey, those are the rules,' he says. 'I don't make them. I just follow them.'" -- Talk Magazine, September 2000
."Any woman who expects the man to pay for everything all the time is behaving like a spoiled princess... A woman who has the means to pay for a date but refuses to do so is saying the pleasure of the man's company is not worth the price of dinner. Why should any man want to waste his time with a woman who has such a low opinion of him?" -- letter to the editor from a woman in Silver Spring, MD. New York Times, August 31, 2001

Like this woman, for instance:

"'Of course the men have to pay and buy you presents. Men have to spoil you. You have to be spoiled,' says [a 26 year old woman] who works in public relations. 'If you don't think you are a princess you're not going to be treated as one. You have to make sure you know - and they know - you're a princess. This is my feminism. It's the new feminism to say, "I'm expensive. I need lots of attention. I need men to bend over backwards for me."'" -- article by Rebecca Eckler in the National Post (Canada), August 26, 2000

.

"The feminist freeloading doesn't change with marriage. Professional women still want their husbands to get the checks at restaurants, pay the mortgage and be home by 6:30pm to help with chores and the kids." -- Maureen Dowd, New York Times, August 29, 2001

Tuesday, January 20, 2004

Every woman I have ever met has had rape fantasies. It's part of the bigger problem that women find evil to be sexually exciting. The other side of the coin is they find love and goodness to be boring. You see this over and over and over again. Act like a total prick all the time and many women will be very attracted to you. They want you to hurt them in various ways including various violations like rape. The sicker the woman, the more real she will want it to be. Most women will seek out men who are likely to rape them for real. This is the real cause of rape in our culture. Rapists get tons and tons of dates while good men are treated with contempt. Part of it is a woman wants a man who is evil. But the other part is the rape fantasy. They want the type of man who is likely to rape them. I have a lot of experience with BDSM and I can tell you right now, those people are whacked. For them, nothing else exists but the degradation and humiliation of themselves and others. They always pretend it's just a fantasy that they want occasionally in the bedroom. But, it's a lie. They absolutely will not accept good behavior or intimacy from you, nor anything that approaches respect for yourself or others. If you won't cooperate, they will become bored with you and move on. They will be very vocal about denying this and insist you are ignorant for thinking so but you will observe this in every single woman who indulges in this. Self loathing is at the core of it.

Monday, January 19, 2004

Of course, throughout history tattoos and piercing have been used for both slavery and as body art... but not in our culture. In our culture it's deviant. Oddly enough, it is still deviant among various minorities that do have a cultural history of tattoo/piercing use, once they join our culture. In our culture, the use of tattoos and piercing on slaves/criminals was dominant. Someone who gets them here is trying to identify with that element. Sometimes it's an attempt to do so in a safe way (look at me, I'm bad, I'm cool). Unfortunately, it is mostly used in an unsafe way (look at me, I’m one of you, come fuck me). You can tell things about women who do this sort of thing... unpleasant things you would be very unwise to ignore. Less so with men though. Because so many women choose the bad men over the good, many men have taken up looking a certain way to get women. Many of my friends are like this. Most have regretted it though.

Having a visible tattoo or inappropriate piercing makes you unemployable at most professional jobs... why? Because it identifies you as not one of the elite that hold those jobs... one of the underclass. Women get these done for the same outcome... to be identified as one of the underclass who is wide open for approach by a low class man. The more wild and obvious the tattoos or piercings, or the more numerous, the lower the class. There are always exceptions but they are rare. If your daughter comes home one day with a pierced tongue, she is telling you that she has decided to give blowjobs to various inappropriate men. Drugs are often involved. The men certainly understand that signal and will come after her. This means you must be extra vigilant or bad things will happen. As I said, it is a very reliable sign.

This is a tough issue because, like all lies (the lie being that people with tattoos and piercings are normal), it has a grain of truth. Normal people do get tattoos. They get them to be naughty and feel adventurous. Men get them because they know women will mistake them for inappropriate men, and are attracted. You can tell who these people are easily. You can't see their tattoos or piercings unless they are showing off. They hide them in polite company. The exception to the exception, are women who get tattoos around their butt, breasts and vagina or people that get their sex organs pierced. These people are sending a clear message that they are a sexual object and expect to be used as such (big warning sign for men).

Even relatively normal (are there any, lol) people who belong to the BDSM scene have a strong thread of this going through them. They hate when you say that, by the way. It goes sort of like this... people think the whole point is to devalue, objectify, and humiliate your partner.....to dehumanize them. But the BDSM crowd says, no no, that's not really true. We pretend to devalue, objectify, and humiliate people in order to have great sex, and they love it. Anyone who does it for real is an asshole and not welcome. Great. So you get to know them and find out that they really are trying to devalue, objectify, and humiliate people... in a bad way. Or, to put it another way, a female submissive wants you to do various bad things to her so she can have screaming orgasms. This is supposed to be limited to the bedroom. But, if you don't treat her like the crawling worm that she is all of the time, she will lose interest in you. The last thing she wants is sincerity, warmth and love from you. These things spoil her perversion. She's using you for sex and has no second thoughts about leaving once reality intrudes (ouch, I have painful memories about dealing with someone like this). The easiest way to spot a female sub is by her tongue piercing and tattoos in the form of a chain around her wrists and/or ankles.
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext

Whatever you do, don't get married to an American woman. All she wants is to take advantage of you, if not outright exploit you. Destroying you and your children is what's on her mind while stealing as much of your money as possible. Most women are very, very good at pretending they are not like this. You won't know what is going on until you come home, find every single thing from the house gone and get served with papers at work. Don't let a woman move in with you. Her only purpose is to manipulate you a little at a time, until you are married. If you balk, she will seek revenge in some way. Once you let the camel get its head in the tent, it gets all the way in. Then it is almost impossible to get her out, and your belongings usually wind up strewn across the desert. It’s a good idea not to be monogamous. A woman's manipulation is a joke if you simply ignore her and fuck another one of your pearls on a string. She will leave without notice or second thoughts, married or not. If you have several girls, this is no big deal. You simply spend time with the others until you replace her. Having more than one woman makes other women want you more, not less.

You must have an iron clad grip on birth control. Almost all of the government help in twisting your nuts long term is related to paternity. Avoid the whole issue by having a vasectomy. Talk to your doctor about if it can be reversed or not. Have some sperm frozen (only you know about it) if you have to. Never tell anyone you are fixed. This guarantees your right to reproductive choice. If you don't reserve the right to choose, the choice will be made for you, usually in a way that destroys everyone's life.

Be very resistant to hiring women or empowering them in any way. Focus on performance issues. A handful of women throughout our entire history have traveled with the hunters, instead of the mommies. That's normal. But most women in the work force aren't part of that breed. They are frauds. Insist on equality in performance and most of these women will come up short. The easiest way to handle this is to give women tough, high profile assignments. When they fail, you have a ready excuse to get rid of them. If they don't fail, you have one of the rare ones that isn't a fraud. They make great tokens. If your boss is the stupid type that lets women in because they might sleep with him, take him out and get him laid. Men who are getting it don't want or need the hassle of importing pussy at work. If your boss allows women to sleep with him to get promotions, get the dirt on him, then (anonymously) let his wife know what is going on, with proof. This gets rid of two birds with one stone. The most dangerous weapon an enemy can give you is the knowledge of their vices. This is an important thing to know. If you systematically and faithfully destroy your own vices, you go a long way toward making yourself invulnerable to your enemies. Take advantage of this disparity in power by destroying your enemies utterly. Never give them the opportunity to employ this concept against you.

Saturday, January 17, 2004

.Movies try to manipulate the public by selectively showing the people and their lives. The idea here is to desensitize people, a little at a time. What they never show is the truth. The issues these movies attempt to minimalize all have one thing in common; they strip away the humanity of the people stupid enough to get involved in those situations. They no longer think like you and me. Nothing is off limits to them and they regularly engage in extremely evil behavior. The best way I can describe the way they view the world is as a big fish eating a smaller fish, which is eating an even smaller fish. Their whole way of looking at the world is looking for possible victims while constantly trying to get away from people trying to victimize them. Do not under any circumstances ever turn your back on someone like this. They can and will put a knife in your back.

A real life example: I once worked inpatient with some kid that got picked up for crack cocaine use, truancy and was given a separate diagnosis of depression. He was forced to be clean while in the program and he seemed like a nice, relatively normal kid... doing all the right things to get his life back on track. Four days after being released from his court ordered rehab, this fucker threw his mother through a plate glass window, killing her, because she wouldn't let him take money from her purse to buy more crack. This is the truth of drug use that you never see in movies. The only one I ever saw that was even close was Menace to Society, and that movie was trying to glorify that behavior. And it worked to. I'll never forget going to see that movie in a black neighbourhood. There was a scene where the protagonist murders a Korean store owner. It was both horrible and accurately showed how the average criminal sets up his victim. The entire theatre minus one, burst into laughter during that scene. Several people had little kids with them. I don't live there anymore.
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Further Reading:

Friday, January 16, 2004

Women find the quality of being an asshole to be very attractive and throw themselves at a guy like that... doubly so if the guy is a dangerous asshole. Outside of this country, things are different. Assholeness is unattractive.

This is part of the problem with American men. We've come to accept the twisted attitudes of American women and internalize them. Attractive men are going around thinking they are losers, while sick, unattractive men with bad BO are going around thinking they are God's gift to women.

But what's really going on here is like attracts like. Most women in the US have become the female version of the sick, unattractive man with bad BO. Unlike men who tend to be one way and stay that way for all of their lives, women change dramatically and quickly, depending on how good they are. When they are 16, they are hotter than hell. At 23, she's still cute. Cresting 30, she looks like hell. And by 35, she's dog ugly and hanging out at K-Mart. This doesn't happen with normal women. It doesn't even happen all the time with abnormal women with very good genes (look at Pamela Anderson), on the outside. It always happens on the inside. That woman who you totally fell in love with at 21, who screwed you over at 23, you wouldn't even recognize today. Her personality is nothing like it was back then (if it ever was, but that's a different story). The important thing to understand is, it has nothing to do with you. Because it has nothing to do with you, there is nothing you can do about it.

This is probably the biggest reason why women seem so scarce in our culture, even though they outnumber us. A woman has a shelf-life of age 15 to 35, maximum. She's really only available between the ages of 20 and 29. After that, her unacceptableness becomes much more obvious. If they didn't want money from us, they wouldn't even bother to go shopping around for a meal ticket at that age. They wouldn't even pretend to be part of our social groups.
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.Bonecrcker #5 – Women Choosing Losers

Thursday, January 15, 2004

Many teachers know exactly what they are doing by indoctrinating children. They do it on purpose... because they hate men and because they are intentionally trying to be subversive.

What's going on is most female teachers (especially the lesbian ones) and many male teachers are intentionally trying to instill certain values in the children they teach. They purposefully go against what most parents want their kids to absorb and much of what they are trying to program into our kids is deviant. They mask what they are doing under political correctness.

Typically, what they do is talk about something perfectly reasonable on the surface. Then, the moment you have your back turned, they throw in a bunch of deviant stuff.

For example, there is a big movement to separate out religion from government and our schools. It's perfectly reasonable to want no religion to have undo influence over our government or be taught as doctrine in our schools. But that's not what they are after. What they are after is to have the principals of atheism be dominant in government and be taught as doctrine in our schools. They actively attempt to shame and stamp out belief in God.

A weird twist on this theme is attempting to expose impressionable youths to Islam, Wicca, and other tenants that have a strong sick streak running through them. Specifically, what they do is portray these in an extremely idealistic light, never mentioning the strong undercurrent of evil flowing through those. One thing those kids will never be shown is the legions dancing around and cutting themselves and their neighbours with knives, like certain of the Islamic sects do (nothing to see here).

Other things they try to instil in kids... the idea that abortion is completely right morally, tolerance of the behaviours that lead to the spread of AIDS, promiscuity, homosexuality as a lifestyle choice (rather than a biological fact, for a small percentage of the population), the idea that men are inferior and woman are superior, that America is a country causing most of the evil in the world, tolerance of drug use, tolerance of pedophilia, the fact that certain minorities are over-represented in prison, and have other social problems, is the result of racism rather than choices they made, promiscuity is OK, acting like a man is not OK. The list goes on and on.

Schools are spending more and more time socializing kids in ways their parents would not approve of and less time educating those kids (this includes college, in a big way).

Worse, teachers feel quite smug about doing things to your kids in direct opposition to your rights as a parent. The whole issue of abortion without parental consent is one example. Another is vaccination. In most cases, the law is on your side, but unless you come right out and threaten the teacher with being arrested or sued, they won't stop.

Several people I know have had to do this to put an end to abuse of their children in school... anywhere from medical abuse to trying to get the kids thrown out of school for supposed misbehaviour (that turned out to be nothing more than the teacher simply not liking the kid).

It's a big, big issue that is mostly hidden. Having your kid inappropriately diagnosed as ADD and then force fed dangerous amphetamines and/or barbiturates, is only the tip of the iceberg.

Seriously, if you have kids, you need to keep VERY close tabs on what is happening to them in school. You'll run into everything from psycho man-hating bitches telling him he is a dumbass every 5 minutes, to some mincing, child hungry pedophile putting the moves on him during gym class.

Schools are dangerous for children.
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
."Give us the child for 8 years and it will be Bolshevik forever." -- V.I. Lenin
."We must declare openly what is concealed, namely, the political function of the school...It is to construct communist society." -- V.I. Lenin
."If the classroom situation is very heteropatriarchal -- a large beginning class of 50 to 60 students, say, with few feminist students -- I am likely to define my task as largely one of recruitment...of persuading students that women are oppressed." -- said Professor Joyce Trebilcot of Washington University in Who Stole Feminism: How Women Have Betrayed Women.
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Further Reading:

Wednesday, January 14, 2004

This is more than just typical gender bias coming to play. It's hardcore child abuse. Its cooperation among mothers, female teachers and a handful of doctors to get children hooked on dangerous drugs (Ritalin is amphetamine, speed). The DEA is considering restricting Ritalin prescription, the same way it restricts Valium, for the same reason... wide spread abuse leading to recreational use by prescription. Also, Ritalin is one of the most common things used to make crystal meth. It's a widespread problem in schools. Typically, a woman will drag her son to doctor after doctor until she gets one that agrees to prescribe it... because most know damn well the kid does not have ADD and the mother is trying to use drugs to zone out her kid so she can spend her time eating bon bons, drinking, smoking crack, screwing drug dealers or whatever else she does instead of watching her children.

Understand that very bad people have infiltrated our schools with the deliberate intent to harm children. This is one of those ways. The deliberate with-holding of education is another. A third is attempting to brainwash children to accept sick and perverted ideals that are specifically at odds with what their parents want for them. Many women are only too glad to cooperate, unfortunately.

ADD is actually a rather rare condition that is related to to two things... mild to severe mental retardation and drug use. Those commercials you see on TV about possible adult ADD never mention that drug use (and severe alcohol abuse) is almost the exclusive cause of adult ADD. In children, you almost never see ADD (separate from drug use) except in mildly retarded children that got that way because their mothers drank heavily or smoked crack while pregnant.

If your ex-wife is attempting to abuse your children by getting dangerous prescription drugs or surgery for them, you need to get your lawyer on the phone double quick and get an order to cease and desist. Threaten to use it to take away custody (if she won't stop, challenge custody). This issue will come up with frightening regularity.
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Related:

Tuesday, January 13, 2004

Most discussions on domestic violence ignore the truth surrounding it. There are dangerous double standards and myths involved in the whole industry. The myth is that women are victims of domestic violence. The truth is that most calls to the police about domestic violence are women using the system to harm their husbands and children. Rarely are such calls used to protect themselves from actual domestic violence. The truth also is that women engage in domestic violence in both equal amounts and equal severity. The double standard means men rarely call police about it. It also means children are often left at risk from it.

To put it bluntly, the whole system is a huge lie. It rarely involves itself in real domestic violence between men, women and children. Instead, it is the opening gambit when a woman seeks to destroy her family, usually through divorce. It's no accident that the system is set up this way. Powerful, evil people set it up that way on purpose. If you pay attention to this and other issues, you start to see a disturbing pattern of intentional manipulation of our institutions and social norms. It's as if a "cold war" was being waged on the US, trying to tear it down from within.

Why, is an interesting question. It's largely unanswerable at this time. (Edit - it's Cultural Marxism). However, who, can often be answered (big example: Hillary Clinton). These people need to be disempowered at every turn. It means becoming aware of them and voting against them. It means boycotting those people, companies and other groups you see participating in this in various ways. Realistically, it means avoiding marriage and children like the plague, for the time being.
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, January 12, 2004

"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today's warfare victms. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children" -- Hillary Clinton at the First Ladies' Conference on Domestic Violence in San Salvador, El Salvador, November 17, 1998

You dead and maimed guys are so lucky!

This speech is incredibly insidious. On the surface it's about women suffering as the unseen victims of war (the grain of truth to this lie). But there is a hell of alot implied by the way she chose to say it.

1) Absolutely no mention of the men who died or were maimed in this war. The implication is that their suffering is separate from their women and isn't worth mentioning.

2) There is a very strong implication that women had nothing to do with a war. It was a needless thing (caused by the thoughtless actions of men) that harms them. Actually, most wars are fought to protect women. History is one long string of good men sacrificing themselves to protect their women and children from bad people.

3) She mentions refugees as if they are only composed of women.

4) She comes right out and says the women are the primary victims of war. This isn't true. The primary victims of war are all the people killed by bullets, bombs and other horrors. These are mostly men. Not only are women secondary victims of war, but there are a hell of a lot of men and children that are also secondary victims.

5) The only time the loss of men is mentioned is how their deaths affect the women emotionally, and more importantly, financially. The irony is completely lost on her. The women she is speaking to probably care much more that they lost someone they loved rather than someone who took care of them. Obviously, Clinton can't see that. It never occurs to her. I bet more than one woman at the conference had a strange look on her face, thinking, what the heck is this gringa talking about? Why is she talking about unimportant stuff? I lost my husband. I loved him!

Guys, this fool was/is looking to be our next president. If you think laws and politics enable women now, imagine what it would be like after 4 years with her at the helm.
.

.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.Mother of Calamity – from “The Lamentations of Matheolus", 1295 AD
.It's true that women are lazy, but they are always ready to do harm. An evil woman just gets worse, becoming even more evil and wicked. It would take far too long for me to tell you everything about them, so for brevity's sake I shan't. Woman is not wise in this respect, for in her eagerness to do harm she only brings about her own ruin. According to the law, as I understand it, woman is not rational, nor does her love reside deep in her heart, but is there on her gaze for everyone to see. She entrusts her honour openly to her eyes, yet they can't help but fail to protect it, since folly animates her gaze. With all her words, her chatter, and her talk, she could break a heart of glass; all her actions are stupid and foolish. Woman can do no good, indeed, goodness is destroyed and obliterated by her. Many a war is begun by women and many a murder committed throughout the world; castles are burned and ransacked and the poor made destitute. As every man and woman knows, there isn't one war in a thousand that isn't started by a woman and by her sowing of discord. She is the mother of all calamities; all evil and all madness stem from her. Her sting is more venomous than a snake's; there isn't anyone who has anything to do with her who doesn't live to regret it..
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Further Reading:
.A Sexist Commenter Sets Me Straight
.Man Superior to Woman - Chapter Four
.The All-Encompassing Power Of The Pussy

Sunday, January 11, 2004

In my experience, racism plays a big part of what's going on with American women. Several times I have met women whose attraction to men is race based... the more negatively stereotyped, the better. Behind their back, they use racial slurs, even when talking about their partner. You talk to them and it becomes clear that they have strong racist views, usually negative. They are chasing bad men and the racist views colors these men as bad. So, they go after them. It's a complicated issue, and one that women will test you on to see if you will accept it from them.

For example, there was one stripper I knew. For awhile, she was sizing me up as a potential man. One day, out of the blue, she says this to me, "I've been with a lot of black boys." "Do you think less of me?" My answer to her at the time was, "Of course not."

But that was the wrong answer. My answer should have been yes. There are several reasons. First of all, she is testing me, not looking for reassurance of her worth. She wants to see if I will accept her in a devalued state. If the answer to that is yes, she loses interest (she did lol) and, at the same time, goes hog wild in the process of devaluing herself further. On the surface, she wants to know if I'm racist. But what she is really saying is she is racist, and a whore to boot. What's behind her statement is several years of screwing black men, but only from the criminal class of society. She did this in exchange for money and drugs. Certainly she would have no interest in a black man in a 3-piece suit and a law degree. Part of the manipulation has to do with what she means by "black boys." She means black men from the criminal class of society. But, phrasing it this way is a trap. If you say it devalues her, it seems like something racist (being with black guys devalues you) but, it's the having sex with men from the criminal class that devalues her. If you say no to this sort of behavior, it implies that you are racist. You'll see a lot of manipulation along these lines in society, especially with women. They want you to accept deviant behavior by associating it to minorities. Reject the behavior and they act as if you rejected the minority.

You will see this pattern repeatedly with American women... multiple minority partners, sometimes multiple children of mixed racial background. The big lie is that inter-racial couples are now accepted, so people feel free to get together with those they like. But the truth is that racism and fucked-upness are behind most of these relationships (white men with black women; seem to me to be the exception). Look for extreme racist views in one or both of the partners (should be the LAST thing in an inter-racial couple), a history of trading sex for money and drugs, and multiple one night stands, often resulting in children. Like any good lie, there is always a grain of truth in the center to give it credibility. There are lots of legitimate inter-racial marriages. You can tell the legitimate ones by their stability, high degree of education of both partners, and successful career the man has.

Saturday, January 10, 2004

There are two reasons women go after scum... the one they tell themselves and the one that's true.

The one they tell themselves has to do with the archetype of redemption. Love redeems all things. To a woman, love redeeming a bad man proves the love is real (too bad their love ain't real, lol). Also, a man who treats everyone poorly but herself, must really love her. This is the biggest crock of bull-ony... but exploiting this sick, sad, self-deception will account for 90% of your free pussy if you live in the US.

Unfortunately, the real reason women dig bad/low quality men is they are bad/low quality themselves. These men have attitudes and behaviours that match their own.

Excitement is supposed to come from risk-taking behaviours that men like to engage in to have fun. But women find bad behavior exciting instead. It's normal for women to be attracted to men that like sky-diving, mountain climbing, and going off on adventures at the spur of the moment. It's abnormal for women to be attracted to men that like to beat women, have been in jail, and take drugs. But that's exactly what's going on today. All of the losers have all the women they can deal with (hehe, but evil people are bad for you....both ways), while all of the real men do without.
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Related:
.Bonecrcker #5 – Women Choosing Losers
.Bonecrcker #6 – Women Choosing Extinction

Friday, January 09, 2004

There is only one reason you see thinly veiled hatred everywhere in commercial media. The men who run that media have sold us out to pander to women. Way back in the beginning, it was simple, harmless fun designed to get a chuckle. Nobody had disrespect for men. That was the point. That's what made it funny.

But things have changed. Most women and many men have open hatred and contempt for men and our many accomplishments together and as individuals. It's not meant to be funny anymore. It's meant to be disrespectful.

There is, of course, only one real way to deal with this situation, and that's to hit these traitors where it hurts the most... in the wallet. Watch commercial media very carefully and boycott any product with advertising that shows hatred, contempt or disrespect toward men. This includes movies. You know what makes a movie a chick flick... open contempt, hatred and disrespect toward men. If some woman wants to go see a chick flick with you, tell her no and tell her why. Make it clear that you don't accept attitudes like that from her or from anyone else. If she tests you, dump her.

A very important part of this strategy is to never give a woman any money, ever, even if she is to go spend it on your behalf. Many men let the woman buy everything. Advertisers then use hatred, contempt, and disrespect towards men as a way to pander to these women who are making all the choices on which products to buy. It's very difficult to change the women so this is no longer an effective marketing strategy. But it is extremely easy to short circuit it... just don't give women any money and boycott products harmful to men. Eventually, they will go out of business.
.PreviousBonecrker IndexNext
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What's Wrong With The World -- G.K. Chesterton (excerpts)

Sex and Character -- by Otto Weininger

The Encyclopedia Marxofeminist

Feminist "Equality" Includes The Loss of Free Speech

If you are afraid to speak against tyranny, then you are already a slave. To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer and impossible to ignore. -- JBR Yant

"We can't expect the American People to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism." -- Nikita Krushchev

THE ANIMAL FARM REALITY OF "FEMINIST EQUALITY:"

"Differences [between men and women], including the products of social inequality, MAKE UNEQUAL TREATMENT NOT UNEQUAL AT ALL." -- Catharine MacKinnon, "Reflections on Sex Equality Under Law," Yale Law Journal, 1991

The Demographic Trap

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within." -- Josef Stalin

Back to the Bible

"The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into smaller states and all-national isolation, not only to bring the nations closer to each other, but also to merge them." -- V.I. Lenin

No Thanks - We'd Rather Be Canadian!

"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one" ~Benjamin Franklin

Man-Made Global Warming is a Hoax being used to bring about Global Communism (Globalization)

"Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains." -- Herbert Hoover

Just Doing My Part to Fight Global Warming!

"The threat of environmental crisis will be the 'international disaster key' that will unlock the New World Order." -- Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in "A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind", by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5

Rule by Science

Philosophy Corner

“Dialectical thought is related to vulgar thinking in the same way that a motion picture is related to a still photograph. The motion picture does not outlaw the still photograph but combines a series of them according to the laws of motion.” -- Leon Trotsky

Dialectical Thought is a Cornerstone of Marxism, and Feminism (Because They Are One In the Same)

The Marxist Dialectic's Zig-Zag

Wishing to advance in a room full of people, I do not walk through the aisle and straight toward my goal. Nor do I move slowly through the crowd shaking hands with friends and acquaintences, discussing points of interest, gradually nearing the objective. The dialectical pathway is different. It consists of a resolute forward advance followed by an abrubt turn and retreat. Having retreated a distance there is another turn and advance. Through a series of forwardbackward steps the goal is approached. To advance thus is to advance dialectically. The Communist goal is fixed and changeless, but their direction of advance reverses itself from time to time. They approach their goal by going directly away from it a considerable portion of the time. Lenin wrote the textbook, One Step Forward, Two Steps Back. Chinese Communist schoolchildren are taught to do the dialectical march taking three steps forward and two steps back. If we judge where the Communists are going by the direction in which they are moving we will obviously be deceived -- Dr. Fred Schwarz, President of Christian Anti-Communism Crusade

The Pussy Pass

All's Fair In Love and War

The Matriarchy Lives! (Click Picture)

"I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of 'Women's Rights', with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were woman to 'unsex' themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings, and would surely perish without male protection." -- Queen Victoria, 1870