Hello, I have the username cyberchip; but, call me Chip, as in Chip off the old block. my education is varied, I have a degree in Metrology, which I always have to mention is not Meteorology. My work background is more interesting. I have worked as a technician at NIST, DOD, NASA, and a nuclear power company in my function of Metrologist, which makes me a standards bearer, as I work with specifications, and measurement technology with primary standards.

Since 1970's I've been keenly interested in Quantum Physics, and am self taught and consider myself a Quantum Theorist. I claim this distinction by virtue of the 'amateur' status, which my wife can attest to the number of hours I spend at this; and the lack of pay. For good or bad, I am a highly functioning Autistic which has blessed me with a capacity for absorbing huge quantities of information, in relatively short periods of time; and I have chosen Physics as my primary and fairly obsessive area of interest, more specifically Quantum _____ (fill in the blank).

I ran across your post to one of viascience's videos on Quantum Mechanics, and was curious. And, now I'm here. I find your perspective relevant and interesting, and like myself evolving from a POV in that I observed something in physics which caused me to question everything.

I principally follow wave mechanics, and much to my surprise, my theory seems to correlate to 'most' of what exists, even if I developed my ideas independently of those theories. However, I'm not sure how relevant my own concepts are to this, only that I find your concepts to be strongly coherent at the specific scale at which they apply, and your interest in nuclei and electrons, which adding photons includes my area of focus. I have also worked on a Zero Point Energy, or Space, and do a lot of research at planck levels. I find Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle extremely disconcerting, as he did himself, and love the concept of adhering to the concept of proton potential as a fundamental state of existence at our scale, which indeed is most of the scale of particles in the cosmos.

I don't think you should discount your model fitting into the standard model, as so far, it appears it does, but, with other aspects of that model, I would like to discuss in the forum. Thank you for the invite, and I hope I might contribute something to either of our theorems. I look forward to talking with you and others.

Welcome to the forum great to have you onboard, having experience in metrology, we can put you in charge of checking all measurements :). I have the same problem as you, my wife (partner) thinks groundpotential is a waste of time and can't understand how it will ever make any money, well .. not everything is worth explaining.

Groundpotential is looking good, I am becoming very confident, so even if the answer is not obvious, as in the case of the H atom electron orbit, my gut feeling told me GP was right, which made me look a little deeper, and there it was, a beutiful solution.

My first paper on GP is now in need of a little re-writing, but it takes time and peace to do this, something I havent had too much of lately. So the forum has been the place where I post new ideas and thoughts as they come to mind.

Looking forward to working with you..

Steven

Steven SesselmannOnly a person mad enough to think he can change the world, can actually do it...