The
lawsuit—Rodriguez v. Bush, et al., Civil Action No. 04 CV 4952—was filed in the U.S. District Court in Philadelphia
on Oct. 22.

The phrase “new Pearl
Harbor” comes from a declaratio n of principles by the neo-conservative Project for the New American Century. In it, the neo-cons
proposed that an event is needed to propel American public opinion toward supporting the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and U.S.
military domination of the Middle East.

Two men who worked extensively in the wreckage of the World
Trade Center claim they helped federal agents find three of the four “black boxes” from the jetliners that struck the towers
on 9/11 - contradicting the official account.

Both the independent 9/11 Commission and federal authorities
continue to insist that none of the four devices - a cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and flight data recorder (FDR) from the
two planes - were ever found in the wreckage.

"Most people think that it is such a wonderful report, but
when they find out about how there’s other information that hasn’t been investigated at all, the 9/11 Commission at least
has the appearance of being nothing more than a white wash or a cover-up."

"If one assumes that the American populist tradition
is a good tradition, and I’ll say that it is, then the populist aspect of conspiracy is also a good thing," he says. "It helps
us to recognize that it’s a perfectly acceptable thing to question what our leaders tell us."

It's easy to prove that 9/11 was an inside job devised, executed,
and then covered up by the highest levels of the American government.

The real problem now is an American populace that is hell-bent
on denying what I've just said. This continuing denial on the part of those who refuse to listen and understand will take
both them and us to exactly where their denial is headed - straight to the hell of widespread slavery, poverty, disease, more
acts of suspicious terror, and ultimately to World War III and the end of human society as we know it.

The DHS research contract resulted from CISAC’s observation
of last year’s spring State Department-DHS-sponsored, full-scale exercise called TOPOFF2, designed to prepare national, state
and local officials to respond to potential terrorist attacks within the United States.

The suit alleges that Bush, as President, violated the US Constitution
by deliberately lying to - and defrauding - the US Congress into passing an "Enabling Act" resolution in October 2002, authorizing
Bush to wage aggressive war on Iraq. The war is unconstitutional and an illegal drain on the US taxpayers' funds in the treasury.
The suit alleges the Iraq war is unconstitutional and that declaratory and injunctive relief should be ordered. It is unconstitutional
and illegal because the president violated the Separation of Powers provisions of the Constitution by deliberately lying to
the Congress by falsely assuring them that Bush had evidence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, and that Iraq was
involved in plotting and carrying out the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade center TwinTowers and the PentagonAttack
- attacks actually orchestrated by defendants. The suit also alleges that the USA PatriotAct I and PatriotAct2 are unconstitutional
and must be struck down as such, because they violate the fourth, fifth, ninth and first amendments to the US Constitution,
by permitting the government to spy on Americans and violate their rights to privacy, and because the Patriot Acts, like the
war in Iraq, were passed under false and fraudulent circumstances presented by defendants to the Congress.

"What all the other reports on 9/11 did not do is point the
finger at individuals, and give the how and what of their responsibility. This report does that," said the intelligence official.
"The report found very senior-level officials responsible."

By law, the only legitimate reason the CIA director has
for holding back such a report is national security. Yet neither Goss nor McLaughlin has invoked national security as an explanation
for not delivering the report to Congress.

I am skeptical about the reorganization of the intelligence
community in this legislation. In creating an entire new bureaucracy, the National Intelligence Director, we are adding yet
another layer of bureaucracy to our already bloated federal government. Yet, we are supposed to believe that even more of
the same kind of government that failed us on September 11, 2001 will make us safer. At best, this is wishful thinking. The
constitutional function of our intelligence community is to protect the United States from foreign attack. Ever since its
creation by the National Security Act of 1947, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has been meddling in affairs that have
nothing to do with the security of the United States.

Who could have such power, such intelligence gathering, such
unusual timing, such stealth ability to fool all the security agencies of the world, coerce all the news media, in order to
plan and implement an attack on 9/11/2001.

An attorney employed by a law firm with multiple ties to President
Bush met with a 9-11 widow's step-daughter prior to her commencement of an estate takeover attempt which could limit the widow's
future legal options as she seeks to hold Mr. Bush and others accountable for failures before and during the actual two-hour
period of the attacks.