DVDActive uses cookies to remember your actions, such as your answer in the poll. Cookies are
also used by third-parties for statistics, social media and advertising. By using this website, it is
assumed that you agree to this.

Silent Hill (UK - DVD R2)

Oh no, I can hear you say, not another video-game-tie-in. So many have come over the last few years, from the good (Resident Evil), to the bad (Doom), to the just plain ugly (House of the Dead, Alone in the Dark). The formula from the original Resident Evil game has been copied several times, not just by franchise efforts, but also for other productions in the same genre. Silent Hill (both the game and the movie) adopts the same basic concept: a female protagonist takes on the unknown in an extremely scary house. The game, however, was globally renowned for being scary as hell. Often carrying nothing more than a lighter, the freaky things that go on in the house on the hill no doubt gave game-players more than a few nightmares. The question is, will the movie do the same?

Movie

“Sometimes when you go to sleep you go on a little walk. And you talk about a place called Silent Hill.”

Rose Da Silva's daughter, Sharon, is ill. She sleepwalks, and quite dangerously too, often ending up poised atop a cliff, mumbling about a place called ‘Silent Hill’ whilst preparing to leap off. Deciding that enough is enough and that she has to do something about it, Rose goes against the wishes of her husband, Chris, and takes her daughter up to the place known as Silent Hill. It is a desperate decision and a foolish one too.

When she gets there, it is not long before strange things start happening. To begin with, the entire compound seems to be deserted, and showered by eternal snowflakes (although you learn later that it is not exactly snow). The 'deserted' aspect is also not exactly true, as the establishment is peppered with strange, freakish creatures that those who have played the video game will no doubt be familiar with. For those who haven’t played it, think Resident Evil crossed with Doom, with a little The Ring and Aphex Twin thrown into the mix. Rose’s journey through this place soon turns into a trip through hell as she discovers the truth about Silent Hill.

As a game, I can imagine how Silent Hill would be pretty damn scary. Piloting the lead character through the weirdly-changing almost-deserted environments, escaping and evading the scary, deformed creatures that inhabit the dark recesses of this place, it must have been very interesting and very involving. It must have made your heart-rate race. The movie follows exactly the same pattern, almost down to the skirt-and-boots outfit of the central protagonist, but in doing so I think it fails where other video-game-tie-ins succeeded. In holding so tightly to the original material, those behind this particular effort have forgotten that movies are not interactive and that watching a person walk around for the best part of an hour, with no explanation as to what is going on, is just a little bit boring.

I say the best part of an hour because this is a two hour movie, and the second half certainly offers more insight into what is happened in this mysterious ‘Silent Hill’ to make it so hellish, but unfortunately by then the patience of most viewers will have no doubt run out. There’s only so much of it you can take—shouting, screaming walking, running, opening doors, discovering mutilated bodies, seeing deformed creatures that disappear, solving puzzles, finding clues, more running, more shouting and more screaming. For an hour, simply nothing significant happens. Nobody dies, nobody even talks a great deal and you are left feeling like a bored voyeur, watching somebody else play a video game and waiting feverishly for them to complete it.

Radha Mitchell’s heroic turn in the superb Pitch Black (possibly the only decent Vin Diesel movie) catapulted her away from her small-screen Australian TV origins and firmly established her as a next-generation heroine, but her subsequent movie choices have not been so action-orientated—until now. Unfortunately, however perfect a choice she is as the lead female, Rose, the final movie script simply does not give her enough meat to work with. Her character here is just another one-dimensional goodie-goodie heroine who runs and screams and occasionally fights, and has absolutely no depth.

Sean Bean (Goldeneye, Patriot Games) desperately fails at pulling off a decent American accent and is also utterly wasted here, in the supporting role of the concerned husband, another limited supporting role (alongside Equilibrium and The Island) to add to the resume of a man who was once a contender for the role of James Bond himself. We also get Laurie Holden (X-Files)as a cop who partners up with Rose to escape the horrors and she too is given very little room to manoeuvre. We even have Deborah Kara Unger (Cronenberg’s Crash, The Game) and Alice Krige (Star Trek: First Contact) in brief cameo roles.

The cast aren’t really as important as the effects, however, and in this aspect the movie largely succeeds. I say largely because there are a few disappointing moments, particularly earlier on, which make it harder for the viewer to retain their suspension of disbelief. The effects do get better, however, and grander, with the weird mutants getting bigger and more numerous as the movie progresses. Here the plot takes too long to develop in much the same way as the effects, becoming both more intriguing and more convoluted, but still not substantial enough to make up for the dragging first half.

For a Christophe Gans film, I should not really be surprised by any of this. A French filmmaker, he has succeeded better at his French-language efforts (like the amazing Le Pacte des Loups/Brotherhood of the Wolf) than at his US alternatives (like the dumb but stylish Crying Freeman and Renegade). There are some great concepts in Silent Hill, a few nice sequences and a dark tone throughout, but overall the movie just does not hold together as anything much more than average.

Video

Silent Hill is presented in a gritty but decent 2.35:1 aspect ratio anamorphically enhanced widescreen transfer. Detail is reasonably good throughout, with good clarity and negligible softness. Grain is also kept to a minimum and there are no significant signs of edge enhancement. The colour scheme is quite broad and well represented, with the effects-laden set-pieces accurately recreating the same restricted, dimly-lit shadowy world as the game. Blacks are solid and allow these shadows to be pretty superb and overall it is a decent effort for this kind of production.

Audio

The accompanying Dolby Digital 5.1 track is perfectly suited to the subject-matter, with a freakish, ominous, occasionally Aphex-Twin-esque soundtrack (that utilises decent piano pieces in the calmer moments) that really gives the movie considerable atmosphere (and does its best to help the viewer overcome the disappointing effects). Dialogue is clear (mostly consisting of Rose shouting out the name of her daughter, Sharon) and comes largely from the frontal array, with effects and the score thrown across the surrounds, and even a little bass added in to spice things up. It’s a very good effort that probably marks the highlight of the disc.

Extras

In the way of extras, the only significant addition is a making-of featurette. Luckily it is a fairly comprehensive one, split into sections: origins, casting, set-design, stars and stunts, and creatures unleashed, and running at forty-eight minutes in length. It features interviews with all the main cast members, including Radha Mitchell and Sean Bean, with expansive breakdowns of all the major set-pieces - looking at the special effects and the sets that were created in great detail. It is quite revealing stuff, sometimes too much so because you feel a little disappointed at how easy it was (the green-screen shots make some of the grander shots look breathlessly easy to construct). We get a little input from the Director and his crew as they instruct some of their cast during scene snippets, and overall it is a decent addition to the disc.

There is also a photo gallery with over a dozen shots both promotional and behind the scenes in nature. We get a series of TV spots and the theatrical trailer as well, but none of the above really makes up for the lack of a commentary.

Overall

Silent Hill is a reasonable addition to the increasing number of video-game tie-ins that have spawned over the last few years. It lacks originality and has no sense of pace, but some of the effects are interesting for those who can tolerate the disadvantages. Presentation-wise, the video and audio are good (the soundtrack perfectly suits the material) and the documentary is fairly comprehensive, even if it is the only decent extra. Overall, fans of the original game will more than likely find this a must-see movie (if only to sate their curiosity) and it is probably worth a rental for those who want to see just how dark an imagination the creators had.

Advertisements

Comments

Reply

Message

Enter the message here then press submit. The username, password and message are required. Please make the message constructive, you are fully responsible for the legality of anything you contribute. Terms & conditions apply.

good review even though I disagree with Cas' opinion. I thoroughly enjoyed Silent Hill and was riveted the entire time. Very chilling, very surreal, very creepy and quite scary...a wonderfully inventive horror film that screams a SEQUEL will follow. The film feels so unhollywood imo which no doubt is alot to do with former Tarantino writing collaborator Roger Avary .

I think some people miss the point of reviews entirely. They're subjective. If you like the film, good for you, Cas isn't telling you that you're wrong. He is here to review the DVD, and a part of that is the film. If he hates the film but gives it a glowing technical appraisal then that's all you need to concern yourself with. Slating other people because they don't like the film that you like is f**king moronic, and had I seen some of the posts in this thread earlier I'd have kicked a few people off with temporary bans until they learned to control themselves.

I'm not a fan of this review, though I don't think it's as far off the mark as some people seem to think.

Problems will always arise when a cult computer game is taken to the movies as there will be a clash of ideals. The fans want an absolutely faithful translation of a game, whilst everyone else wants a genuinely exciting movie. Examples of this leading to no one going home happy would be Resident Evil, or Bloodrayne.

Because of these two 'faiths' then reviews of the film should be expected to be different. A fan of the series would for example assume or already know key details whereas others need to be told what's going on. That's just the way it is.

I'm not particuarly keen on the comparisons to aphex twin, as whilst aphex twin share the characteristics of being rather dark they are extremely digital and technologic. The soundtrack of Silent Hill has always been very industrial, like the stuttered sounds of a rusted saw mill.

In any case, I think some people need to calm down whilst the others need to be a bit more mature - How can you say something is c**p whilst demonstrating the very minimal understanding of what something is? Ignorance is not a virtue...

This review isn't terrible, though being a fan. I can't really comment - your insight echoes a very different sound to my own.

Gabe Powers wrote: Was that suppose to be self-parody, or are you just making this up as you go along?

Don't you EVER use that tone of voice with me, MISTER!!!!!! WHO DO YOU THINK YOU'RE TALKING TO?!?!?!?!?!?! I'll tell you what you're gonna do, you're gonna march yourself *UP-STAIRS* to your room and you're gonna STAY THERE UNTIL ***I*** TELL YOU TO COME OUT!!!!!!!!!

What sefl-parody? Because you think there's more there to the game? Such anger over such a little thing. I understand this game was an important part of your life, but to some of us one survival horror game is no different from the rest.

Oh my God you guys take this stuff seriously. I remember cringing the whole time I wrote my review for "Why We Fight", assuming it would lead to much namecalling. How was I to know that Cas' review of some video game based horror flick I assumed no body liked would prove so much more controversial? It makes me appriciate political banter to know that there are people out there who care this much about what others think of their video games.

And for the record, I watched someone play the original game for about an hour, and from what I saw, Cas is right on with his statement. Do any of you even know who Aphex Twin is?

"For those who haven’t played it, think Resident Evil crossed with Doom, with a little The Ring and Aphex Twin thrown into the mix."

That has got to be the most pathetic, superficial, shallow, insipid, idiotic description of the games I have ever read. I stopped reading this "review" as soon as I came across that paragraph, knowing it will be impossible to take that dribble seriously after that.

mikey mike wrote: all that's left now is Mr. Joseph's negative review then my life would be complete I doubt you will see one, Sony in America are exclusively sending out full screen versions of Slient Hill as review material. The widescreen release was only available in VHS.

I really want this title but it is so obviously coming out later as a special edition. There was even an uncut version announced when the dvd was first mentioned. Maybe the French may do something special, they love Christophe Gans - their 3 disc release of Brotherhood of the Wolf is one of the best that I have. There is a site called Rewind, which I check before I buy any title as it offers listings of all versions available including cuts etc. Although it is a brand new release Rewind state that the documentary on the USA version is about 15 minutes longer than our version.

..and about the "running and screaming" complaint: It's about a woman looking for her daughter, and the Daughter have disappeared on her in this horrible place. I think that's more than enough to merit her the right to run around and scream her name. After all she's looking for her daugther, and if she's going to have a chance at finding her at all then maybe she have to scream her name. There's nothing that says that all films have to be the same so what's wrong with this film being a bit different?

I for one am not afraid to admit that I am a huge fan of the games and that i've been looking forward to seeing this film ever since it was first announced. I didn't have the oppotunity to see it in a theater, but I watched it last night. Silent Hill is by far the best adaptation of a video game to film ever. They managed to capture everything that I loved about the games and then some. The only thing that surprised me was how raw it was. But that's a good thing.

Did you forget your sign in info there, lalala? Your second sentence actually backs up my point, which was that the video game's history was moot. Cas never said it was a horrible film. And comparing Bradbury and Truffaut's work to this is a good way to make it look bad, not to mention comparing reading a classic novel to playing a video game.

Sometimes we don't have time to research every disc that happens upon our doorstops, and for the most part I think that Cas' lack of knowledge concerning the video game makes his review more valid, at least to someone like me who doesn't really care about the game. You can nit-pick all you want, but honestly his 'error' doesn't affect his detailed critique of the film itself at all. I've got a good feeling that you disagree with his opinion and utilized your encyclopedic knowledge of a series of video games to try and start a fight.

I'm sorry, but I don't really see how anyone can take this review very seriously. You obviously didn't do any research at all. I'm not sure where you got the idea that the game took place in a house and that the protagonist was a female. It's true that in Silent Hill 3, which the movie IS NOT based on, there is female lead, but for every other game, including the first which the movie IS based on, the lead is a male.

I really think it's important for a reviewer to at least do a little research into what he's reviewing, but that aside, is there any particular reason as to why in the audio section you decided to start calling Rose "Alison?"

Just wanted to add that I got my R1 DVD today and unfortunately, you're right, there's no commentary and no deleted/extended scenes. However, they do have that screen before the film that explains how Sony pictures doesn't necessarily support whatever the direcor, crew or cast might say on the commentary. But there's no commentary. Very strange...

Well check out DVDActive HERE and DVDTown HERE Both sites clearly state that there indeed is a commentary and deleted/extended scenes on the R1 DVD. That's all I have to go on for now. But i'll be able to tell you really soon as I expect to get it with my mail today.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the R1 release of this doesn't have a commentary or any deleted scenes either. Both editions are virtually the same; with the exception of the cover art, although both are now very similar.

So I guess it's safe to say that you should go with the R1 DVD if you're a fan considering it also has deleted/extended scenes and an audio commentary by the director? I didn't get my R1 DVD Friday, so I guess i'll have it tomorrow.