NT03 - natural track query

Genuine question. Why are you sending an RLE1 form to change track code? So long as the code is non eligible code does it really matter? I litter my forms with NA02 as a sort of 'dump' code. Would never think to submit an RLE1 to tell RPA about Mt03 or whatever. Hey ho.

Click to expand...

NT03 is ineligible whereas putting that area under the main parcel code is eligible. Do that over enough instances and you hit the limit for fines if they disagree.

I say that.....having not completed one for ages.....but when I looked up the hedges and considered it for that I'm sure I would only have needed to submit one.

Click to expand...

You can. Some of these tracks I put RLE1s to put them in a year or so ago. We were inspected last year and they have taken some out and put some in with no rhyme or reason so I'm not sure I can be bothered to go through process just to end up where I started.

I can’t see that you need to use an rle 1 for a track. I have several fields with a continuous track along one side of them. During remote mapping they said some were tracks and others weren’t. For ease I took them all out.

In theory NT03 could be returned to production, rather than being a Permanently Ineligible Feature like a surfaced track or hard standing. My boss is leaning on tenants to plough up field edge and rotate tracks around to maximise the eligible area or is threatening dilapidations. I don't see where he is coming from as it will be irrelevant in a few years anyway.

In theory NT03 could be returned to production, rather than being a Permanently Ineligible Feature like a surfaced track or hard standing. My boss is leaning on tenants to plough up field edge and rotate tracks around to maximise the eligible area or is threatening dilapidations. I don't see where he is coming from as it will be irrelevant in a few years anyway.

Click to expand...

That would really annoy me as a tenant, and I agree with your statement.