And that's one of the whole points of doing it whether there was or wasn't any fraud. The grain is planted in your head there must have been
because someone called for a recount...

Maybe if I was born yesterday. But I wasn't. I have been watching these voter and election fraud issues for years. I have seen it. I have heard
it. It's real.

...and it was hard to get it...

Again, very real and very true. It's pert near impossible for a presidential candidate directly affected to get a recount -- much less any other
confirmation and verification of election integrity. Us average Joe's and Jane's don't have a chance.

... (nevermind that the person doing it doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of getting anything out of it no matter what a recount
shows)...

No, I won't "nevermind" that the person doing it has absolutely nothing to gain personally... In fact, it is that very reason I give her the benefit
of the doubt regarding her intentions. Especially as opposed to those who do have everything to gain and/or lose in a close scrutiny of the
process.

... and thus, the system must be invalid no matter what.

Nope. The system is invalid because of what is or is not happening throughout the election process... not because someone says something and someone
else jumps to some conclusion or another.

However, for those who wish to protect the backdoors and other illicit and illegitimate voter and election fraud, attacking the person -- rather than
the issues -- is a very common way to distract from and undermine the real issues.

Now the upcoming presidency is just that little bit undermined.

Nope. The issues were already there -- and are still there -- for anyone and everyone with the eyes to see and the ears to listen. It's the refusal
to address the underlying issues that undermine every presidency.

They did this with Bush too.

Yes -- exactly my point. There have been serious issues for a very long time which have never been appropriately addressed. I have no problem with
Stein (or anyone) shining a big fat spotlight on those issues. I have a big problem with those who try to ignore those issues and hide those issues
and make up stupid stuff and otherwise prevent full transparency and overview.

I was a young first time voter in 1978, I worked that election year with my family favorite party as a volunteer,My father was very active in
politics, and still is to this day, back then we check on voters validity with big print out generated data paperwork that weight it a lot and
went door to door in our assigned district to make sure the voters where alive and able.

I agree that is voters fraud, more now than ever, but back in the days it was an effort to make sure we register voters and cross out the death, I
don't remember ever hearing about doing something illegal.

In Pennsylvania, the two largest counties (Philadelphia county and Allegheny county) have completed a recount, even though the state recount has not
been approved yet.

Clinton picked up 5 votes.

The five extra votes for Clinton, he said, came from paper provisional or absentee ballots that were undetected by the optical scanner that
counted votes in the days following the election. Schmidt said this can happen when people don’t mark their choices clearly on paper ballots or,
ridiculous as it sounds, use a green highlighter instead of a pen or pencil.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.