On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 11:30:50AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Generally I think the spam filtering done for all the other lists is
> > pretty decent and takes case of most of it. I've got my own filtering
> > in case something gets through (and for non-debian lists that don't have
> > much filtering at all).
>
> I'm on debian-deity and debian-security-private and the signal/spam
> ratio there is extremely low. For debian-security-private we'll probably
> see 20 spams for every valid mail, if not worse. So I don't think the
> current filtering comes close to being good enough.
>
I thought debian-security-private had no spam filtering? It's not hosted
on murphy anyway, so it has absolutly no relevance to the facts at hand
here.
Pasc