Libyan troops sit on an armored personnel carrier during a demonstration calling on the international community to arm the Libyan army in August 2015. Congressional committee members want to know what the Trump administration plans to do as ISIS and al-Qaida persist there and evidence shows Russia is pushing into the years-long civil war. (Abdullah Doma/AFP/Getty Images)

ISIS and al-Qaida are regrouping in war-torn Libya as reports indicate Russians are pushing a military presence into the years-long civil war and some members of Congress want to know what the United States is doing about it.

Members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee held a hearing on the status of Libya last week, on the same day that militants detonated a car bomb on the convoy of the chief of staff to the general who heads one of the two major armies vying for control of the country.

“Militias, criminals and terrorists” are operating with “impunity” in some areas of Libya, said Chris Blanchard, a specialist in middle eastern affairs in the Congressional Research Office’s Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade Division.

A top U.S. commander said he wants to continue pressuring Islamic State and al-Shabaab fighters.

By: Andrew deGrandpre

Those militias emerged following the fall of former dictator Muammar Gaddafi the beginning of the 2011 Libyan civil war, which has continued.

The militias are smuggling drugs, guns and people within and beyond the nation’s borders. Migrants flowing through Libya to Europe face sexual abuse, torture and enslavement, said committee Chair Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Florida.

Those problems and the activities of ISIS and al-Qaida are spilling into North Africa neighbors Mali, Chad, Sudan and into Egypt via arms trafficking.

In previous statements, Marine Gen. Thomas Waldhauser, head of Africa Command called instability in Libya possibly the “most significant threat to the U.S. and allies’ interest on the continent.”

Fear of missing out?

Fear no longer. Be the first to hear about breaking news, as it happens. You'll get alerts delivered directly to your inbox each time something noteworthy happens in the Military community.

Thanks for signing up.

By giving us your email, you are opting in to our Newsletter:

It is not a contained problem by any definition. And committee members want to know what is the strategy for Libya under President Donald Trump.

Blanchard echoed ongoing comments on the current role of U.S. military forces in Libya — counterterrorism.

“I also think that, in terms of our investment, you know the Department of Defense is to the extent that we are investing in a sort of long-range counterterrorism approach, it’s a containment strategy and it’s built entirely on this,” Blanchard said.

But he was quick to note that the nature of that mission also draws on U.S. resources, both diplomatically and militarily.

Smokes rises after an airstrike on an Islamic State militants held area in Sirte, Libya, Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2016. (AP Photo/Manu Brabo)

Waldhauser’s troops conducted an airstrike in late March that killed Musa Abdu Dawud a senior member of al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb who was instrumental in providing training and weapons to regional militants, according to an AFRICOM release.

That was one of at least eight airstrikes since September, which pales in comparison to the nearly 500 strikes conducted in 2016, many of which targeted Islamic State fighters, according to data tracked by the Long War Journal.

At that time Lt. Gen. Robert Ashley, head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told Congress that ISIS in Libya “remains a formidable regional terrorist threat” and the al- Qaida affiliates are spreading their influence in the region.

And the conditions don’t have an easy option.

Blanchard listed two basic options — more diplomacy and assistance or less U.S. involvement.

More involvement could help U.S. goals, he said, but could lengthen U.S. commitments and invite others to intervene.

Less involvement could reduce the burdens on the United Sates but could make the country and its neighbors less secure, calling for more U.S. intervention.

One of those “others to intervene” are likely already there.

At the same time, Rep. David Cicilline, D-Rhode Island, noted there are reports that Russian special operations forces are in the border region between Egypt and Libya as Russia officials facilitate weapons deliveries to the forces of Gen. Khalifa Haftar, head of the Libyan National Army.

Frederic Wehrey, a senior fellow with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told the committee that Russia’s actions aim to undercut U.S. influence in Libya.

“I think this is an opportunity for them,” he said. “I think they have a number of financial goals in mind, regarding arms contracts, that many of which they had before the revolution, gas deals, they had infrastructure projects.”

The experts who testified stopped short of calling for a boots on the ground peacekeeping mission in Libya at this point. But not necessarily because of the costs associated.

“You know, peacekeeping itself has its own sort of difficult track record as well,” said Alice Friend, senior fellow with the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “Peacekeeping is an extraordinarily difficult thing to do and it really depends on the parties on the ground wanting to have a peace to keep. And I don’t think we are there with Libya yet.”

Todd South is a Marine veteran of the Iraq War. He has written about crime, courts, government and military issues for multiple publications for more than a decade. In 2014, he was named a Pulitzer finalist for local reporting on a project he co-wrote about witness problems in gang criminal cases. Todd covers ground combat for Military Times.