forrest-dev mailing list archives

At 19:49 27/05/2002 +0400, you wrote:
>Hi, forresters!
>
>What is your opinion on sub-sitemap usage for community section (and for
>others in future)? Having all the handling in the root sitemap is not a good
>idea as showed Cocoon's experience (have you seen its root sitemap?). If
>there are no objections then was is the proposed location for subsitemaps?
Good idea! It will make the move to a "multiple site" version
easier. Mind that the current Cocoon 2.1 CVS does not support
sitemaps. Carsten has broken them while upgrading some component.
>Btw, what is the reason to use matchers like 'body-**.xml' instead of
>'body/**.xml'? IMO, using directory separators is more readable than the
>current approach. (E.g., in i18n samples in C2.1-dev I used 'content/*.xml'
>and 'menu/*.xml' patterns and the result was the same).
To my opinion, there is no advantage or disadvantage. It's just a way to
get things working. We must decide on a convention though, to make life
easier afterwards.
I suggest using the directory separator. It will be a lot easier for
non-cocooners to understand how the setup works once they start
implementing forrest.
Bert
>--
>Konstantin Piroumian
>kpiroumian@apache.org