It is interesting to know how a democratic country like the United States of America differs to some other countries when it comes to several aspects that drive a certain nation. Things like the rights and privileges of the people, right to suffrage, and the right to live in a…

Download file to see previous pages
ertain nation are capable of governing their own selves but at least, it is of an utmost fact that people always desires for the good and well-being of their own country; hence, the essence of universal suffrage prevails that the people instinctively chooses leaders who will run the nation; leaders who possess the same amount of passion in upholding the welfare of the nation and therefore deserves to take supreme control over the nation.
In America, it is very evident from a keen observers eye the results brought about by democracy. There is so much talent that can be found everywhere. There are many people who are more deserving for a seat to supremacy but are not part of the supreme authority. Instead, they are part of the common Tao that work and live a normal life every day and it should be noticed that these are the outcomes in connection to democracys excess over its previous limitations. Democracy is not merely deficient of judgment that is important to choose people that truly deserves their trust, however, almost always have not wished or had the intention to
look for them. It is of an undeniable fact that institutions embracing democracy inclines to introduce a sense of jealousy in the heart of each individual; it is not due to the fact that they have all the capacity to rise above everyone elses position as ultimately because these would mean to unnoticeably beset the people who hired them. Democratic bodies enlivens and teaches a desire for fairness which cannot be satisfied at all.
The norm of fairness that renders men self-regulating of each other provides them a practice as well as a perception for going along their isolated acts no other controller aside from their own drive. The whole freedom, which they always delight in relative to their peers and in the interactions of personal life, lean towards making them gaze at all power with an envious eye and hastily proposes towards them the concept and the passion of political liberty. A usual bias
...Download file to see next pagesRead More

While trying his best to make sense of the lecture, he became frustrated and yelled “Fuck history. I hate history and all this bullshit. I don’t even know why we need to learn this shit. I am damn sure that our government is bunch of corrupt fools.” Entire class burst into laughter except our history teacher.

It is common for people or institutions to treat individuals differently depending on the above mentioned factors; and these cases are punishable by law if a person or institution is convicted. Before the Human Rights Act of 1998 was passed, all human rights breech cases were heard at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

This is a common misconception. Some people think they have the right to say whatever they want to or about whomever they choose without fear of legal retribution. This is not true. The First Amendment defines freedom for the U.S. separating it from many other nations that do not allow free speech but not all speech is protected, an important distinction among other aspects of speech this discussion will investigate.

On the surface, this Amendment seems to provide a lot of benefits to the American society. For example: media has the freedom to provide information to the citizens of US, and the citizens of US are free to fight for their rights that might be violated by the government through changes in constitution.

It gives them the right to make public opinions, news and information without any meddling from the government. It grants people the right to gather and march in public, demonstrate, protest and carry signs to express their

Adversaries of Hate speech codes claim that if government limits speech in any way, it will include speech, which is constitutionally protected (Gould 43).
Colleges, as well as universities in the United States, have experienced startling increases in

ree speech should be interpreted with deference to some commonsensical restraints and limitations as any freedom that is interpreted in an absolute sense is poised to do more harm than good.
The freedom of speech extended by the First Amendment in a way defined the nature of

We have made each other that we are today, each others competition and backbones. We are valedictorians, live your life to the fullest. Leave the yapping of failures to avoid them drowning you from your beliefs. Most importantly gather courage to