There is “no excuse” for failures to look after athlete welfare, UK Sport chief executive Liz Nicholl has warned.

Her comments come as British Cycling prepares for the publication of a report into alleged bullying, favouritism and sexism.

Nicholl told the BBC that she would be “clear about the actions that UK Sport and British Cycling need to take”.

And she admitted that “there probably hasn’t been enough attention in sport about how they do things”.

Nicholl also suggested that UK Sport were “fed a very light-touch version” of an internal British Cycling review conducted after London 2012.

Former British Cycling chief executive Peter King took anonymous statements from 40 personnel as part of a report that was never made public.

“We didn’t receive the King report,” said Nicholl.

“We were given to believe that… actually we had a very light-touch version of it fed to us at UK Sport, so we had no indication of the significance of that report.

“It’s only now come to light through the review.”

Former British Cycling chief executive Ian Drake commissioned the King report but left the organisation in January, three months earlier than planned. He could not be reached for comment.

UCI President Brian Cookson, who was president of British Cycling when King delivered the report in December 2012 said he would not comment.

In a statement, British Cycling said: “In September 2012, Ian Drake asked his predecessor Peter King to conduct an assessment of the UK Sport-funded world class programme at the close of the London Olympic cycle.

“Contributions were made with a guarantee of anonymity, so key findings and recommendations were shared in briefings with UK Sport and the British Cycling board.”

This content will not work on your device, please check Javascript and cookies are enabled or update your browser

‘The system is pretty male-dominated’

The investigation into the culture at British Cycling was conducted by a panel headed by the chair of British Rowing, Annamarie Phelps.

The inquiry, announced last April, was ordered following allegations of sexism and bullying made by rider Jess Varnish against former technical director Shane Sutton.

Varnish claimed the coach had used sexist and discriminatory language when dropping her from the Olympic programme, something he strongly denies.

In October, Sutton resigned and was found guilty of one charge of using inappropriate language by an internal review.

A number of other riders and former staff members have backed Varnish’s portrayal of “a culture of fear” within British Cycling, including former road world champion Nicole Cooke, who told a parliamentary select committee that it was a sport “run by men, for men”.

Former performance director Sir Dave Brailsford has insisted he ran a regime that was “not sexist but definitely medallist”.

“All those views are being taken into account through the review,” said Nicholl.

“It’s fair to say that the high-performance system here is pretty male-dominated. There aren’t very many female coaches and there’s an opportunity to address that in future, and to get a better balance to support athletes in a way that athletes of today want to be supported.

“Athletes have moved on and maybe the programmes haven’t moved on as fast as they should have done, but what we see is an opportunity.”

Media playback is not supported on this device

Sutton resigns amid discrimination row

‘There has not been enough attention paid’

The legally sensitive nature of Phelps’ report has meant it has been delayed, with fears it could be heavily redacted to protect witness confidentiality.

Those who gave evidence are now being asked how much of their testimony can be revealed, while those criticised have an opportunity to respond.

Publication could take another month, but on 1 March British Cycling will brief staff and riders on an ‘action plan’ – effectively its response to the report and concerns over the way it operates.

This will include greater oversight of its high-performance programme, and more consideration of athlete welfare.

“There’s no excuse for not addressing duty of care responsibilities to athletes,” said Phelps. “There’s no excuse for not putting athletes first.

“They are are the ones who’ll deliver the medals and every programme should be trying to ensure they have happy and successful athletes and there probably hasn’t been enough attention in sport about how they do things.

“There’s a lot of focus on operational delivery, probably not enough on leadership management and communication.”