Chris Wilson writes:
>I don't see exactly why this is beyond the realm of CSS (obviously beyond
>CSS1, but not necessarily CSS2, e.g.). It's purely a declarative
>mechanism, and pretty easy to drop into both the syntax and (in our case
>at least) the implementation.
another tuesday brain misfire chris. I said _CSS1_. :) And by the way -
answer your phone. :)
>Forcing DSSSL on content authors and Web tool implementers who are
>resistant even to the simplicity of CSS is just probably not going to
>work.
Hence the throwing CSS through a converter. I meant this to mean
internally Emacs-W3 would convert CSS declarations into a DSSSL equivalent.
The user and the author wouldn't have to know the difference between DSSSL
and a hole in the wall.
-Bill P.