NY Fed believes Fannie, Freddie should order principal reductions

Investors who buy delinquent mortgages routinely reduce principal to maximize value on these loans, according to William Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Therefore the government-sponsored enterprises should do so as well.
"It would make sense for Fannie and Freddie to do this as well in order to minimize loss of value on the delinquent loans they guarantee," Dudley said in a speech at the New Jersey Bankers Association Economic Forum in Newark, N.J., on Friday.
The GSEs routinely resist calls for principal reduction. Michael Williams, CEO of Fannie Mae, told HousingWire in September that the company has no plans to ask mortgage servicers for principal reductions.
In May, Freddie Mac CEO Ed Haldeman, who recently announced his resignation, said principal write-downs do not make sense for Freddie Mac. Further, principal reduction may lead borrowers to default at higher rates to try to get their mortgage debt reduced.
Dudley said such a tactic would need to be avoided if Fannie and Freddie were to order mortgage servicers to reduce principal on the loans the GSEs securitize.
"I believe we should also develop a program for earned principal reduction for borrowers who are underwater but keep on making their mortgage payments," he said. "Such a program would strengthen the incentives for mortgage holders who are underwater to continue to stay current on their loans, and reduce the likely number of defaults and REO sales."
Dudley said analysis from the New York Fed suggests that without a significant turnaround in home prices and employment, a substantial proportion of negative-equity mortgages default, without an earned principal reduction program in place.
"One option developed by my staff is for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to give underwater borrowers on loans that they have guaranteed the right to pay off the loan at below par in the future under certain circumstances, including that the borrowers have continued to make timely payments," he added.
"For instance, the borrower could be given an open-ended option to pay off the loan at a loan-to-value ratio of 125%, and the right to pay off the loan at an LTV of 95% after three years of timely payments," according to Dudley.
He adds that this would protect borrowers against further declines in home prices who, in return, give up a portion of any upside from future capital gains on the home via a shared appreciation agreement.
"Note that under this arrangement some of the reduction in the loan amount would be paid by the borrower as the outstanding balance was amortized by continued monthly payments," he said.
Write toJacob Gaffney.
Follow him on Twitter @jacobgaffney.

Related Articles

Jacob Gaffney is the Editor-in-Chief of HousingWire and HousingWire.com. He previously covered securitization for Reuters and Source Media in London before returning to the United States in 2009. While in Europe for nearly a decade, he covered bank loans and the high yield market, in addition to commercial paper, student loan, auto and credit card space(s). At HousingWire, he began focusing his journalism on all aspects of the housing and mortgage markets.

This month inHousingWire magazine

The appraisal industry is in the midst of huge disruption as automated valuation models and hybrid appraisal products gain favor with regulators and investors. What does the future hold for appraisers and appraisal companies as they adjust to the new realities of automation?

Feature

As Millennials grapple with paying off student loans, their opportunity to buy a home gets pushed further and further into the future. That delay has consequences far beyond individual students — the growing student debt crisis impacts every part of the economy.

Commentary

There has been a conscious and rapid shift to broaden the use of alternative valuation products for origination. Not every decision needs a $500, full-blown 1004 interior appraisal. And in some markets where appraisers are short in number, the turn times can stretch from days to weeks. What these new alternative — some would say disruptive — valuation products do is enable lenders and servicers to better match the product to the risk by harnessing big data and technology.