The solar community stands up in alarmAnd declares that truly there has been no harm(with ads from both sides that at times have lacked charm).

What will happen today as the positions unravel?Will there be resolution at the sound of the gavel?

With statements and emotions at times vitriolicWe stand by and monitor (somewhat melancholic)Wishing the proceeding became more bucolic.

In closing, the purpose of this Seussian missiveIs to beg that the parties become less derisive.For tomorrow’s a new day – we can only surmiseThat like the Phoenix of legend the sun will still rise.And all parties to which this debate has comprisedMay someday too begin to surmiseThat the battle’s not lost when we all compromise(less has been done for the Nobel Peace Prize).

I think A is the answer they're loiknog for.B is not a drawback, so it can't be that.C is not a bad answer, both could be inefficient in terms of cost. And a windmill does take maintenance.D is not a horrible answer, considering some homes may be in places that don't get enough sun and/or wind. Like if you lived in the boreal forest in Canada, or on the forest floor in the Amazon jungle.