Do you mean race is not an issue between Whites and jews, or do you mean race is not an issue when it comes to mass third world nonwhite immigration into the West?

I would be somewhat willing to conciliate with jews if they would stop their leftist anti western, anti white aggression. I accept that there are a few jews are not leftists, but the impression is that at least 70-80 percent are.

HER PROFESSOR

I have no moral or any other problem with WN whether it includes Jews or not. Every group of people has in my opinion the right for self determination. You don't have to wait till you will become a minority to be understood for claiming it.

Therefore I'm not against the claim of WN in general.

On the other hand if race is the issue than I think most Jews should be accepted to the club. But race in my opinion is not the thing to fight about.

Race is maybe the issue when it comes to third world mass immigration. But why classify them by race and not as you mentioned third world or non western?

By protecting the western way of life from mass immigration of others also the white race will be preserved. Since most of the westerner are whites.

It is easier to achieve that way these two goals. It is simple to define the west more than to define a race.

If race is the issue to classify people than there is no end to it. Today all whites are more or less legitimate, but what about the future? Is there a chance that by the same criteria's that some race are excluded today (crime iq etc.) some white groups will be excluded in the futere one after the other? What will be the end? In the sake of what goal is it worth loosing people after people till having the only and the best white version/mutation.?

The treat is from non western countries. The blacks, the Native Americans, the Jews and all the other minorities possess no treat to the future of the white race. Mass immigration from third world countries is a treat, especially of Muslims (black or whites).

Would it be better to replace all non whites in America with Muslims white Albanians? Will life in the US get better and safer this way?

It is pity that so many Jews are lefties. They simply get caught in the middle between hostile Muslim immigrants and on the other hand too many WN that hate them for nothing. Anyway why judge them as one.
Should the Jews or any other group be excluded from the white club according to its political view?
I think Jews should have no reason to be against WN when it comes to immigration policies, it is in their own interest to block Islamic mass immigration, and they are the first to suffer from it.

I mean race is not the thing to fight about, western lifestyle and values are.

Thank you for being pro-western. The main threat to the west and White societies at present is non-White immigration – legal and illegal – into these societies. The main thing that you and all pro-western Jews could do to help the west now would be to urge those influential in Jewry to use the major mass media in White societies (almost entirely owned by Jews, see http://natall.com/who-rules-america/index.html) to call for an immediate end to non-White immigration into White societies and the deportation of all illegal immigrants now in White societies. Please organize a party of pro-western Jews within Jewry and begin strongly insisting to influential Jews that an urgent media campaign be implemented for the purposes of ending non-White immigration to and deporting illegal immigrants from White societies.

leleft

Quote:

1. I have read somewhere that Hitler was supported, in the begining, by rich Jewish bankers and industrials, because they have been afraid of bolshewism.
2. After the World War II noone could say anything against the creation of Israel...
Did Hitler, in some manner, help Jews to create Israel?
Were they all crusified for Israel?

I'm not sure about all of what you ask. But I would recommend the following reading. You seem quite fluent in English, so maybe these being in English will not be a problem.

Using your media, you have led many Whites to embrace the religion of political correctness and anti-Whiteness. I would say that never before in history has a more asinine belief system been adopted by so many people. And yet many Whites adhere to this religion with a fervor that would rival that of the most dedicated adherents to Islam! Jewry, it has to have been obvious to you for many years – indeed, decades – that if you could make Whites believe such nonsense, then you could make us believe just about anything. So, why have you continued to teach us this self-destructive religion? Do you seriously think our destruction is going to benefit anyone? Including you?

Evidently, the White race has this susceptibility to be made to believe nonsense. And not simply nonsense, but nonsense that is as punishing, destructive, counterproductive, etc. as political correctness! But still, it’s most ironic and most true that the White race, even with this great weakness, is the pillar of civilization. This is a fact.

Jewry, how about using your media to teach Whites a new religion? How about a ‘save the White race and help others help themselves’ religion?

The main thing that you and all pro-western Jews could do to help the west now would be to urge those influential in Jewry to use the major mass media in White societies (almost entirely owned by Jews, see http://natall.com/who-rules-america/index.html) to call for an immediate end to non-White immigration into White societies and the deportation of all illegal immigrants now in White societies.

While the jews need to work with their media, Whites need to also ensure that White owned media speak out against non-White immigration. Here are some huge White controlled media outlets:

These firm combined control a large majority of all newspapers, magazines, TV stations, radio stations and outdoor advertising. Mr. Miller, why not take the lead and work to educate our White bretheren who run these companys. It is one thing to beg the jew for help - it is yet another to help ourselves.

These firm combined control a large majority of all newspapers, magazines, TV stations, radio stations and outdoor advertising. Mr. Miller, why not take the lead and work to educate our White bretheren who run these companys. It is one thing to beg the jew for help - it is yet another to help ourselves.

I am afraid these companies are heavily jew infested, regardless who owns them. The most important publications are owned by jews, my media and society professor once stated that the New York Times is the newspaper of record. Much of the content in lesser papers comes from the dominant ones or such sources like Reuters or AP.

I am afraid these companies are heavily jew infested, regardless who owns them.

Are you implying the White owners and top management are impotent in the face of a few jewish employees. What does this tell us about the ability of the White race to defend itself?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Der Professor

The most important publications are owned by jews, my media and society professor once stated that the New York Times is the newspaper of record. Much of the content in lesser papers comes from the dominant ones or such sources like Reuters or AP.

The New York Times is owned by jews. The Wall Street Journal, the LA Times, the Chicago Tribune, the Philadelphi Enquirer, the Dallas Morning News, the Houston Chronicle, the New York Post and hundreds of other papers are not. The Times has a readership of about 1 million, which is less than 1/3 of 1% of all Americans - White papers have circulations of 50 times that.

Are you implying the White owners and top management are impotent in the face of a few jewish employees. What does this tell us about the ability of the White race to defend itself?

Yes I would, one accusation of anti-semitism and we will have one White owned media company less. And even if that was not the case, many whites in such industries are liberal anti-white traitors who gladly go along with the latest crazes. Standing up for Whites is unfortunately bad for business these days.

The New York Times is owned by jews. The Wall Street Journal, the LA Times, the Chicago Tribune, the Philadelphi Enquirer, the Dallas Morning News, the Houston Chronicle, the New York Post and hundreds of other papers are not. The Times has a readership of about 1 million, which is less than 1/3 of 1% of all Americans - White papers have circulations of 50 times that.

I have recently read that Americans are reading less and less print news. I would say it is a safe bet that the vast majority of Americans get their propoganda from TV.

Regarding White papers having circulations 50 times that of jewish ones, I simply don't know.

[QUOTE=Charles Coughlin]Are you implying the White owners and top management are impotent in the face of a few jewish employees. What does this tell us about the ability of the White race to defend itself?QUOTE]

I have seen information on the "Neo Conservative" Cartel.
Apparently they scour every thing written in any Publication, and if it does not suit them, they either defame the Publication or bring a law-suit of "Anti-Semitism".
According to "Noahide" directives, anybody showing any "Anti Semitic" tendencies, might in future, if they get their way, be sectioned as mentally "Ill". In other words if you do not agree with the fate of the Palestinians, you may be declared "Sick".
So, it is not Powerlessness in the face of Jewish employees, but in the face of Powerful Jewish Cartels, who are not afraid to use their Lawyers and Doctors, to silence their opponents.www.noahide.com

Don't you think that the overemphasis of the holocaust is a problem for jews as well? I have the impression that powerful jews use this 60 year old event to manipulate their fellow jews, to make sure that they follow a certain political line.

The holocaust was a terrible event.
I personally don't feel comfortable with the fact that it is so often on the agenda.
It should be learned and commemorate in a reasonable way so people will know what happened but it should be done in proportion.
As a young person the last thing I need when I am traveling is people looking at me as a holocaust survival with pity.
I also don't want people from Germany or other places to feel uncomfortable with me, once they hear I'm from Israel.
Again I'm speaking for myself although I know many other Israelis feel like that. On the other hand there are always people that will say that nothing will be overemphasizing on this issue, I think they are wrong but I can't blame them.

Notwithstanding the above, I think that the problem with the fact that the holocaust is on the agenda all the time is more because of those who deny it.
They raze the issue all the time and put it to discussion, like it is happening here on every second thread. I never thought I will tempt to address here the issue.
What's the problem to say o.k. it happened it was a terrible crime and mistake. But it has nothing to do with WN or with present day moderate NS.
Today many white people will resist WN by simply telling them that they are acting like the Nazis in ww2 (which is wrong). If the answer will be that there was nothing wrong with the Third Reich and there was no holocaust, WN will just loose those many people. They might even stay lefties although they want to do something against irresponsible immigration policies.
But if WN, and even some moderate version of NS, will simply and honestly say "the holocaust was one of many terrible crimes in the human history and we are very sorry it happened, but we have no intention to let anything like that to happened again, we just want to protect our way of life, our ethnic identity and the future of our children from a wave of immigrants that simply want to take over the place rather than to assimilate".
If WN will just say that than what claim can be make against them?
But instead too many WN care about the past rather than the future, and that’s irresponsible.
Is it more important to wave all the time Nazi symbols and hopelessly try to convince fellow whites that everything in the Reich was perfect rather than to secure the future?
I mean the Nazi flags scare hundreds of potential supporters on every black or Jew they scare out of the country.
There is nothing wrong with German patriotism but it can be done in a way that doesn't make too many WN look as fantasizing and protecting virtual non existing past rather than pragmatic people with reasonable solutions.

What's wrong with these Fallschirmjager below? Don't they deserve better respect than those SS who were running the camps?

They, in my opinion, should be more popular among WN and they should be legitimate by any other person.

People don't want the same mistake of the third Reich to be repeated, And that for itself something that may prevent WN from becoming mainstream if something will not be done about the approach and the image.

We are not in 1936, we are 70 years later and the modern problems need a more realistic approach.

it seems that too many people here are interesting to fight over the control of some TV stations rather than addessing the real problems.
If their line will prevail the result in few decades will be that they may find themselfs in control of those stations, but with nothing to do with it since the most spoken languish will be Arabic.