A former Guantanamo detainee, Mullah Raouf Khadim, is reportedly leading a contingent of Islamic State fighters in Afghanistan’s southern province of Helmand. Khadim’s role was first reported by The Wall Street Journal and the Associated Press (AP).

Raouf had served as a top Taliban military leader until he and his allies lost an internal power struggle, paving the way for him to switch allegiances.

“A number of tribal leaders, jihadi commanders and some ulema [religious leaders] and other people have contacted me to tell me that Mullah Raouf had contacted them and invited them to join him,” the AP quoted Gen. Mahmood Khan, an Afghan military official, as saying.

Raouf’s fighters have reportedly engaged in skirmishes with their Taliban counterparts.

The Taliban is trying to thwart Raouf’s recruiting efforts on behalf of the Islamic State. It is not clear if Raouf has developed operational ties to Abu Bakr al Baghdadi’s organization, or if his allegiance is more aspirational. The Islamic State has been attempting to cut into the Taliban’s and al Qaeda’s dominant share of the jihadist market in the region since last year, when al Qaeda officially disowned the Islamic State.

The revelation of Raouf’s role came just days before the top US military commander in Afghanistan warned of the Islamic State’s recruiting efforts.

“We are seeing reports of some recruiting” on behalf of the Islamic State, General John Campbell told the Army Times. “There have been some night letter drops, there have been reports of people trying to recruit both in Afghanistan and Pakistan, quite frankly.”

General Campbell stated that the Islamic State has a “hard message to sell” in Afghanistan. “The Taliban have their allegiance to Mullah Omar and a different philosophy and ideology than [the Islamic State], but, potentially, there are people who are disgruntled with the Taliban, they haven’t seen [Taliban commander] Mullah Omar in years, or they want to go a different way,” said Campbell.

Separately, Ariana TV in Kabul quoted Campbell as saying that “young Taliban” members may be wooed into the Islamic State’s ranks.

Raouf concealed his Taliban role while detained at Guantanamo

Raouf spent several years at Guantanamo, but was transferred to Afghanistan in 2007.

“I am not a member of the Taliban,” Raouf said during his combatant status review tribunal (CSRT) at Guantanamo. During his administrative review board (ARB) hearing, Raouf also denied receiving any weapons training or fighting for the Taliban. He said that he had merely served food from a nearby bakery to the Taliban’s soldiers.

“I wish there was a way I could prove to you that I will not be a danger anymore,” Raouf told military officials. He said he wanted to work with the Karzai government, which was then in power. “If they do not mind, I’d love to go there and help them out with the new government and work for them.”

According to a leaked Oct. 26, 2004 threat assessment authored by Joint Task Force – Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO), Raouf was able to accurately identify several high-level Taliban leaders and “admitted involvement in the production and sales of opium, as well as association with criminal elements within the Taliban and the Northern Alliance.”

Raouf was “generally cooperative” during interrogations or debriefings, but he was “uncooperative in terms of discussing his complete involvement with the Taliban and the opium trade.” He remained “vague and inconsistent when questioned on high-level Taliban leadership or topics of a sensitive nature.” Raouf also “evaded answering questions regarding his role and leadership within the Taliban.”

The leaked file notes that Raouf was “associated” with Mohammad Fazl, who served as the Taliban’s chief of staff and commanded a few thousand fighters.

Other senior Taliban commanders identified Raouf during their time in custody at Guantanamo. Mullah Khairullah Khairkhwa is one of them. Khairkhwa identified Raouf as “a possible military leader, military commander, or possibly even as mayor of Khost,” Afghanistan but apparently never explained Raouf’s true role.

Both Fazl and Khairkwa are members of the “Taliban Five” and were transferred to Qatar last year.

However, both Raouf and Zakir were removed from the senior leadership positions they held within the Taliban after leaving Guantanamo. In April 2014, the Taliban announced that Zakir had resigned from his position as the head of the Taliban’s military commission due to “ill health.” It has been reported that in reality Zakir was forced out. [See LWJ report, Head of Taliban’s military commission resigns due to ‘ill health’.]

3 Comments

Bill – Just on principle I don’t think it is proper to link to still classified material. While in practical terms the contents are compromised, the value of maintaining the integrity of the process outweighs the public benefit derived by its broader distribution. Perhaps it’s contents can be referenced vs furthering the unauthorized distribution of the actual docs. If we don’t value the words secret or sensitive, why should anyone else. My two cents. Pls keep up the excellent reporting!

Scott,
The information has been leaked, and therefore, it is no longer sensitive.
If Bill didn’t use the information, and reference it, someone else would – and has. At least the thorough research conducted by Bill and the team at LWJ credits all valid information — leaked or not — instead of being misrepresented by irresponsible journalism, as made evident by the NYT’s release of the document(s) without substantiating details within.
Further, the leaked information does not compromise sources or methods used by the US, or its allies.
As with many documents of this nature, it is of mine and many others in “industry” that it has been unnecessarily over-classified. In fact, until menial information such as this is returned to a normal classification level we, as a whole, will continue colliding with BS obstacles instead of cleaning house in a more efficient/effective manner.

this ‘is’ all about heroin & the ‘narco’ trade. ISIS/ISIL is more interested in revenue & relationships(recruitment of ‘cannon fodder,’ access to smuggling routes, relations with sympathetic public/government officials, etc.,.) at this juncture, particularly in this part of the world, than establishing ‘something’ resembling what they’ve presently managed to establish in Syria & Iraq. This is also evident in an earlier ‘post’ by TLWJ(Pakistani Taliban splinter group again pledges allegiance to Islamic State). This ‘is’ also a reemerging of the ‘Ghost’ of Mullah Dadullah killed in 2007. One need only ‘look’ no farther than TLWJ Archives to begin to piece this latest ‘permutation’ together.
This development also signals a possible ‘fissure’ in whatever relationship Mullah Omar may or may not have with Ayman al-Zawahari. This also signals a shifting on the part of the Haqqani Network. The Haqqani Network most likely will not openly advocate with whom its allegiance lies. ‘Historically’ the Haqqani Network has remained aloof preferring to defend its hereditary territory(Afghanistan) & predatory gains/acquisitions(Pakistan/Waziristan) submitting to ‘Treaties’ only after it has determined a particular outcome will result in advantages to its own stability & survival. The Haqqani Network has mastered Machiavelli Principles as espoused in The Prince. The Haqqani Network is fully aware of the Strategic Importance its ‘geography’ occupies in fulfilling its own designs & those of others.
Another likely outcome from all this ‘jockeying for position’ & gerrymandering is that after all is said & done al-Zawahiri & those parts of al Qaeda he remains firmly in control of in this AfPak Theater will come to some sort of accommodation with this latest challenge to al Qaeda’s ‘Supremacy,’ at least in this part of the world or another if not overall This could also easily result in al Zawahiri relinquishing his Leadership role & returning to a subordinate position. Furthermore all the aforementioned could easily take place with the ‘outside’ world having little or no knowledge of what I’ve suggested until those overseeing this deign otherwise. Most definitely don’t expect the Fumblelina’s in the Intelligence Community or any of the so-called ‘experts’ reaching any kind of definitive or logical appreciation of whats transpiring.