steve-myers wrote:In all these posts, I'm surprised no one mention the DDNAME=alternate keyword. About the only time it's commonly used is in cataloged procedures that invoke the Binder or the old Linkage Editor, as in -

Re: Re: Changing a DDNAME in a JCL.

Yes, that's correct. Shortly after I wrote my DDNAME=newname post I went back to the first post, and realized - without testing, by the way - that SDSF would show the real, as opposed to the alternate, DD name.