In the long term, human beings have only three strategies to cope with situations where groups in conflict must occupy the same geographic area:

1. Partition (violent or peaceful, often impossible and seldom successful). 2. Migration (always works but there must be somewhere to go). 3. Google "Hutus and Tutsies." 'Nuff said.

The Left imagines an infalliable fourth method that involves positive vibrations, rainbows, unicorns and Skittles, where everyone gets exactly what they want and still arrive home in time for supper. Sadly this scheme exists on in their fantasy world.

So according to the court, *everybody* has a right to the tool known as “affirmative action?”

That is going to be news to the many associations and government-funded organs for the advancement of segregation.

So according to the court, *everybody* has a right to the tool known as “union elections?”

The UAW is going to be surprised to discover that *all of us* now have the right to vote in union elections. *SO COOL!* We don’t need to prove that we are citizens, and we don’t need any photo ID, and we don’t need to prove that we work - because the unions certainly have no requirement that voters are working!

Eureka!

We can *ALL* vote now in *ANY* political election!

23
posted on 11/15/2012 1:37:31 PM PST
by First_Salute
(May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)

Actually, the USSC flipped that on the vacant lot EPA wanted to say was a wetland ~ there EPA said it was too 'spensive to buy it but they could regulate the owners into the dirt with legal costs for cross suits.

Interesting to see this show up in an affirmative action case ~ but there you have it.

Well those Michigan fellas came down here during the 1861-65 war and laid waste to Tennessee and much of the South but NOW they don’t like the way the wind is blowing. We could have told you what it was like to live under Black bureaucrats as we did during the so-called Reconstruction.

As former CSA General Jubal Early said “What a gentle institution slavery must have been to have so well prepared the Negro for the ballot box.”

32
posted on 11/15/2012 1:44:38 PM PST
by Monterrosa-24
(...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)

Actually, the way federal regulations are written if you were born in a part of North America ever subject to the authority of the King of Spain, then you can claim to be an Hispanic.

Most folks making a claim of special privilege for hispanics really don't know their history since EVERYBODY born in the USA was born in a part of NA which was subject to the authority of the KIng of Spain.

While employed by the federal government I regularly put in appeals of my categorization when the boss would send in a form every year saying I was something else.

They'd ignore it.

One law suit by someone demanding privileges and being denied those privileges where Hispanic status is at issue would seem to be ripe.

This has to be by affirmative action lawyer/judges. To have a mindset that says one part of society must have unburdened rights over another part of society with burden of need for voting is preposterous. Only from a distorted view of social justice could such a decision be made. If possible this needs to try for remedy higher up.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.