Turkey: Rights Defenders on Trial for Doing their Work

Eleven human rights defenders go on trial in Istanbul on October 25, 2017, facing terrorism charges despite the absence of any credible evidence of criminal wrongdoing, Human Rights Watch said today. The prosecution should ask for the defendants to be acquitted of all charges, including membership in terrorist organizations and for the nine people in pretrial detention to be released.

“The allegations against the 11 human rights defenders on trial in Turkey for links to and even membership in terrorist organizations are unfounded, contradictory, and politically motivated,” said Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “There is no justification for holding any of the defenders in pretrial detention, and they should be released immediately.”

The chair of Amnesty International Turkey, Taner Kılıç, has also been included in the case and is the eleventh defendant.

The evidence in the indictment accepted by Istanbul Heavy Penal Court no. 35 on October 17 includes random material gathered from the defenders’ phones and laptops. It includes Amnesty International campaign material, a few phone calls with individuals who are subject to other ongoing criminal proceedings, notes from a political meeting, a grant application, a map showing language groups across the Middle East and Asia, and some minor money transfers.

Kılıç had been detained a month before the police raid on the workshop and will also stand trial in a separate case in Izmir on October 26 for having an encryption app known as ByLock on his phone – which supposedly links him to the group the government accuses of last year’s attempted military coup. Kılıç denies the charge and his legal team point to two expert reports demonstrating that ByLock was never downloaded on his phone.

The prosecution fails to explain in any of the cases how the evidence cited constitutes grounds for linking the human rights defenders with terrorism, and the indictments lack any credible argument that the defendants have engaged in any form of criminal wrongdoing.

“This trial of the 11 in Istanbul and then of Taner Kilic a day later in Izmir represent an unprecedented attack on civil society in Turkey and the legitimate work of human rights defenders,” Williamson said. “Given the absence of any convincing evidence of criminal activity, the prosecution should make clear that the defendants in both cases should be acquitted”

About The Author

Human Rights Watch
Human Rights Watch is one of the world’s leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For more than 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world. www.hrw.org

Number of Entries : 79

Newsletter

Enter your e-mail address to subscribe to our daily news service.

Data protection consentI agree that Pressenza IPA inform me by e-mail daily about published news content and as well about other interesting information and activities. My data will be used exclusively for this purpose. The data will only be passed on to third parties if this is necessary for the fulfilment of this purpose. I can revoke my consent at any time by e-mail to info@pressenza.com or by using the link contained in the e-mail. Further information can be found in the data protection information.