Flynn has been in intelligence over 30 years. He knows the ropes. He was not blindsided, imo. There is more going on here than any of us know right
now. Methinks, the swamp is being drained!!

This is not someone that screwed up, imo.

For heaven's sake! Obama appointed him director of DIA! Prior to that, "he served as the director of intelligence, United States Central Command
from June 2007 to July 2008, as the director of intelligence, Joint Staff from July 2008 to June 2009, then the director of intelligence,
International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan from June 2009 to October 2010". [1][22]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_T._Flynn

There have always been leaks of information, sometimes classified, to the press.

How is that evidence of a collusion between "the deep state" (what is that by the way, outside of a right-wing PC term?) and "the media" (all media?
including that which is routinely favorable to the President as I noted above?)?

Your statement is evolving to be off-topic in my opinion.

Suffice it to say that "mainstream media" includes bias off all sorts, economic and political.

There have always been murders too but that doesn't make murder any less nefarious nor illegal.

Unelected, unnamed and faceless bureaucrats are leaking classified information to the press in order to undermine an elected president. The media
(humans use general terms when they speak) has already been exposed as colluding with the DNC. The media (again a general term, and general term does
not mean "all media") has thrown journalistic ethics to the wind by their own admission in order to stop Trump.

Sorry it is not off topic, because this is what is deeply worrying about the scenario.

Your source is your own opinion. Are you saying your opinion is unsubstantiated by facts that you can reference?

Is it true or false that unnamed, unelected and faceless bureaucrats are leaking classified information to the press?

There have always been leaks of information, sometimes classified, to the press.

How is that evidence of a collusion between "the deep state" (what is that by the way, outside of a generic theortical term?) and "the media" (all
media? including that which is routinely favorable to the President as I noted above?)?

Your statement is evolving to be off-topic in my opinion.

Suffice it to say that "mainstream media" includes bias off all sorts, economic and political.

Maybe because the three most famous/infamous sources of similar leaks whose identities became known are confined to an Ecuadorian embassy, sentenced
to hard time in Leavenworth before being pardoned, and hiding out in Russia?

It's really amazing how you guys were crying that the Russian's were "tempering" with the elections, by allegedly leaking the DNC hacks to Wikileaks,
and your refusal to this day to recognize what was leaked, but you mind when some of us are questioning who's the source of this treasonous action?

Why aren't you questioning source know?

See how that turned out.
Those emails that were obtained illegally spawned the current investigation.

All last summer they were lauded as a revelation into the dirty closet of the DNC and the source wasn't a concern.
You guys told the left that our focus on the fact that the information was illegally obtained was obfuscation. A smoke screen so that our secrets
wouldn't be revealed. back then the source was second only to the damage the emails could do.

But that turned into a double edged sword, an athame of sorts and it carried with it a heavy price.
Because the precious emails sparked the interest of our intelligence agencies as any hack into the government computer system would. They of course
started with Wikileaks who was responsible for bringing them to the fore.
I won't pretend to know how but over the summer and early fall they investigated Assange, guccifer 2, and the source of the stories about Hillary's
health and other disparaging stories clogging social media. Their investigation led them to Russia. Both as the source of the hacked emails and the
fake news stories.
At the same time the FBI was also looking into Paul Manifort and his known Russian history. Russia's assumed attempt to aid trump and trumps constant
praise of Putin led them to investigate all of his team.

Everything the government does is documented. I'm sure there's a record of her approaching the administration with important security information.
Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Did you look to see if there was proof?

Everything the government does is documented. I'm sure there's a record of her approaching the administration with important security information.
Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Did you look to see if there was proof?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.