Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Alexander Hamilton was a “Holdout”

Alexander Hamilton was a “Holdout”By Michael Rikon

According to an article published February 20, 2011, in Crain’s internet magazine, NewYorkbusiness.com, “Holdouts dig in at Willets Point”, the local business owners are fighting City efforts to turn the 62 acre area into a mixed-use development.

This is truly remarkable. What makes it truly remarkable is the concept that a property owner or business owner would be considered a “holdout” for refusing to sell to the City of New York.

Can the reporters who write these articles be so naïve as to the power of eminent domain inherent in the City? Has anyone taken the time to explore the facts and circumstances of the history of this disgraceful proceeding?

Let us set forth the facts of this abusive use of the power of eminent domain. The Council of the City of New York adopted Resolution No. 1759 on December 18, 2008.

This Resolution with other related Resolutions adopted the Willets Point Urban Renewal Area. The Resolution approved the Urban Renewal Plan, the Resolution states, “the Plan requires the acquisition and subsequent disposition of property within the Willets Point Urban Renewal Area.” This is the predicate authorization to condemn.

Although the City is holding a statutorily required public hearing under Article 2 of the Eminent Domain Procedure Law, make no mistake, the authorization for the proposed condemnation is the City Council’s Resolution adopted in 2008.

When the City Council authorizes acquisition of private property, the City is required to comply with the Eminent Domain Procedure Law. That law requires the appraisal of the properties to be acquired and the written offer of an amount that represents 100% of the highest approved appraisal.

This was not done in Willets Point. What was accomplished was the purchase of the properties of the largest owners on extraordinary terms including land to relocate to. And, the ability to stay put even after the condemnation. The City has not made good faith offers to the small owners.

The Eminent Domain Procedure Law requires equal treatment to all property owners. So why does the largest condemning authority in the country chose to ignore the law? Because it is politically convenient. It is no secret that those owners who obtained favorable deals were also those that supported members of the City Council that wrote an “adamant opposition” letter signed by 29 members to prevent the project’s approval. But the Project was approved after the negotiated agreements were made.

The City’s improper conduct in ignoring the law’s requirement of written offers based on fair market appraisals and equal treatment to all property owners is inexcusable. The law was adopted to prevent corruption and special deals.

Indeed, the very scheduling of the Eminent Domain Hearing when the City knows it cannot proceed because it cannot build without ramps to the Van Wyck Expressway is just another improper move to force deals.

Condemnation is a very significant power. It enables a condemnor to forcibly take title to someone’s land or business.

If this awesome power is to be used by the government, it must be used carefully, legally and only when necessary.

Americans have property rights which are guaranteed by out constitutions.

And, remember what Alexander Hamilton said at the Philadelphia Convention, “the security of property” is one of the “great obj(ects) of Gov(ernment)” 1 Record of the Federal Convention of 1787, P. 302. Perhaps Alexander Hamilton was also a “holdout”.

For further information contact Michael Rikon at 212-422-4000 Ext. 23.

16 comments:

Anonymous
said...

Not only is this project an absoulute disgrace, it is setting a horrible precedent. Today we are getting rid of "undesirable" Willets Point to "clean up the area" but tommorow bloomy may be kicking you out of your home to give it to builders to build condos. Eminent domain is not supposed to be for this purpose, and must be stopped, not only for the middle class's sake but for whatever is left of this city.

Considering the fact that that has been used as a dumping ground for toxic waste such asbestos and oil, as well as a chop shop for at least 50 years - why is the City getting approval to build on a toxic waste dump anyway?

Considering the fact that that has been used as a dumping ground for toxic waste such asbestos and oil, as well as a chop shop for at least 50 years - why is the City getting approval to build on a toxic waste dump anyway?

This is another Love Canal.--------------------

So is Hunters Point and Newtown Creek but look at the Trust Fund Babies flocking to those locations.

Is cancer in their kids worth it for ferry service to .... East End Avenue and bike lanes to .... Ravenswood?

Born & raised in Flushing & don't understand the controversy..who cares if its right or wrong, WILLETS POINT IS A DUMP THAT MUST BE RAZED!! tired of these chop shop dealers getting in the way of development..cant wait to move to Florida..NYC IS OVER!

Those "chop shops" provide a valuable service for people looking for car parts such as side mirrors and not have to pay the exorbitant prices of manufacturers. The fact that they are clustered is beneficial to customers. You obviously drank the mayor's Kool-Aid!

Spotted a piece of Queens Crap in your community?

Please note

Italicized passages and many of the photos come from other websites. The links to these websites are provided within the posts.

Why your neighborhood is full of Queens Crap

"The difference between dishonest and honest graft: for dishonest graft one worked solely for one's own interests, while for honest graft one pursued the interests of one's party, one's state, and one's personal interests all together." - George Washington Plunkitt

Sites that kick ass:

The above organizations are recognized by Queens Crap as being beneficial to the city as a whole, by fighting to preserve the history and character of our neighborhoods. They are not connected to this website and the opinions presented here do not necessarily represent the positions of these organizations.

The comments left by posters to this site do not necessarily represent the views of the blogger or webmaster.