Tuesday, 13 November 2012

Bending the Rules

As is well known, the good people of the Slate Islands
have a reputation for the utmost integrity. Never in their history have the
residents of Easdale, Seil or Luing even contemplated taking an unfair
advantage, not only in their working lives but also in their moments of leisure
and recreation.

For example it’s well
known that when the sailing ship Norval struck the South end of nearby Insch on
20 December 1870 and broke up a fortnight later, not a single match-stick from
her a cargo of fine Canadian housebuilding timber found its way into any of the
residents’ modest cottages. You can read the story here, Report from Easdale

Now, one and a half centuries later, the islanders have
been presented with a moral dilemma and like their forebears have decided to
close their ears to the sea-nymph’s call.

The weekend just passed saw the island residents turning
over the Seil Skiff, one of the latest additions to the growing Scottish
Coastal Rowing fleet . The build is of course nowhere near finished, but we’ve
got a lovely fair hull and know for sure that we’ve got a great foundation
to build on. More important for those of
a competitive nature is the simple fact that fairness and smoothness of line
are essentials for a fast boat, as the less disturbance caused the better. This
much is plain to a layman like me, but other aspects are less obvious.

The moral issues have come as the building work has
proceeded. Everyone knows that boat-building is at least 90% sandpapering and
doing mindless work as a group allows time for discussion. On Seil our team
includes a diverse range of talent with a heavy emphasis on science,
engineering and design. Coming as I do
from the law’s dusty purlieus I have been able to contribute nothing, but have
listened as various potential contributors to boat speed and manoeuvrability
have been analysed.

I’m not going into too much detail unless I give people
ideas, but it’s relevant to share the exchange of emails I’ve had with two of
the main people in the project

Ewan’s email to Topher and Robbie

“There are a few practical matters that I'd like to run past you ….It seems that rudder design is uncontrolled and we are free to plan what
we want in terms of the size, shape and angle of incidence of the rudder blade. It also seems that there's no problem with an open inwhale, which we see
in the photos of other boats and would like to adopt. We're considering moving the thwart positions a wee bit forward, as we
see that some skiffs are squatting especially when they have a heavy cox
aboard. I think some teams have done this already.Finally I'm thinking of introducing a small amount of rocker, possibly
reducing the depth of the external keel at the ends by an inch or so from
Iain's construction drawing. It's difficult to be sure from the photos online,
but it looks as if there are some variations already in keel profile.”

Topher’s Reply

“Well done for getting the planking finished, and I look forward to
seeing the finished boat. The rudder does seem to be as you say, uncontrolled,
and there are many variations on a theme. Slotted gunwales are also OK and we
have gone down that route (without reducing weight) for reasons of strength and
drainage. If you move the thwarts my advice would be to keep the number 3 seat
centred on the frame, move the stroke seat 2 inches aft, number 2 seat 2 inches
forward and the bow seat 4 inches forward, thus increasing the space for each
rower by 2 inches and moving the rowers forward, on average, by an inch. We did
this on our second boat and so did the Sailing club here.Although oars are many and varied, a consensus does seem to be forming
that the oars are better restrained in some way from floating in or out at the
oarlock. My advice which you are well experienced enough to ignore would be to
make the cheap oars on the oar tab of the SCRA website, and then using those as
a datum make better ones when you know what you want.I'd be a bit uneasy about introducing rocker or reducing the outboard
part of the keel, because of the advantages to speed and turning which this
departure from the plans would introduce. I'm aware as I write this that the
same could be said of changing the seat spacing or fiddling with the rudder,
but somehow the outside of the hull is sacrosanct, and I would not like to see
people cutting their outside keels down to reduce drag. As you say this may
already be happening and so far we have not done anything about it, but it
could get out of hand.We may have to issue guidance on this, what do you think, Robbie?”

Robbie’s Reply

“Agree absolutely with Topher. In the
measurement rules there is a difference between hulls and fittings (including
thwarts).For Hulls the rule is:

2.1 The hull is to be constructed as faithfully
as possible to the St Ayles Skiff plans produced by Mr Iain Oughtred. The hull
may be constructed from a kit from the approved kit supplier or may be built
entirely from the plans.

That to me excludes varying keel shape by
introducing rocker. For fittings the rule states:

4.1 While the plans show how Rudder, Tiller,
Oarlocks, Thwarts, and Seats can be constructed, it is open to the builders to
innovate and experiment with these fittings.4.2 Oarlocks must be at the gunwale. Outriggers
are not permitted.

Innovation to me includes spacing the thwarts
slightly differently, and that has improved the trim of some boats.

IO
introduced extra buoyancy in the hull shape after the prototype to try to sort
out the fat cox problem, but the boats do still tend to sit rather heavily by
the stern. It can be helped a little bit by the fat cox sitting forward to
shout in the stroke's ear, rather than sitting back and relaxing.

We need to form a sub committee to review the
measurement rules at some point.”

With nearly a hundred boats built or building there is
definitely a need for more precise rules.

Oddly amongst the existing generalities there is one rule
which is very prescriptive and has no obvious purpose, other than to challenge
ingenuity. It is laid down that rowlocks must be made of timber, rather than of
metal, which has been the preferred material for several hundred years. This
would be understandable if the boats had to be constructed of solid timber,
rather than glued plywood. Then the whole project could be seen as an
historical pageant, rather than community sport.

On Seil we’re hoping that this
may be something that the promised rules sub-committee will look at early on.

Update at 19 NovemberTopher comments:-I am glad to read your assurance Ewan that the Slate Islanders would not dream of taking unfair advantage of any loopholes in the rules of the St Ayles Skiff. It fans the flames of patriotic pride in my country to hear of the upright probity of these new entrants to skiffdom. Nevertheless we in the SCRA will deal severely with any club found to have used helium filled plywood, and indeed have invested in a helium detector to stamp out this pernicious practice.

We look forward to hosting you in Ullapool in July next year at the World Championship, and if there are any pipers or drummers in your number we especially invite them to take part in the St Ayles Skiff World Championship Pipe Band.

Well done for getting to the turning over stage and enjoy the fitting out and painting. It is a great moment when you have the first row in your new boat!

1 comment:

Oar Pivots. The difficulty lies in limiting the cost of these items. It is possible to buy a pair of substantial galvanized metal rowlocks for £15 or less, the most economical and durable option for skiff builders. However, a vastly superior option is the adjustable pivot/Gate, which could cost upwards of £100 per rowing station. Or in-between, there are bronze or stainless steel options.

I suggest if a team chooses to use metal rowlocks, these should only be supplied by the Skiff Association. Standard patterns have been available for over 100 years.

The Editor

Followers

A message from the editor

Over the years I've written a lot about nautical matters, mainly for my own amusement. Some of it has been published, but never in any of the mainstream yachting publications, most of which are only interested in articles which promote someone's commercial interest. In fact I have largely given up reading glossy magazines, which mainly seem to recycle tired old stories and have usually given up on any pretensions to accuracy.

This blog started out in 2010 as a place for me to publish my own musings, but I have always been delighted to share the space with anyone who wishes to contribute something on the main themes, the history of yacht and boat design and construction, technical issues, anecdotes and images. This has resulted in my receiving a great deal of material, from historical data to family reminiscences that in most cases would eventually have been lost.

The blog does not accept advertising and is totally non-commercial; the feedback from readers is the only reward.

Contacting me

I am keen that this blog should be available as a place where all sorts of nautical material with a more or less Scottish connection can be published and am happy to post items sent in by others. If you wish to contact me please do so on ewangkennedy@gmail.com