In America Fortune 500 corporations pay 12.1 percent in taxes, on average, on their profits [source] versus the default rate of 34 to 35 percent that any small-to-midsize business (SMB) making over $335,000 USD per year in profit must pay. With corporate tax rates plummeting in half over the last three decades, individuals and SMBs in America are increasingly left to shoulder the difference.

However, it's important to remember the U.S. isn't the only country struggling with the increasingly parasitic nature of politically active corporations. Britain is currently grappling with similar issues.

American and domestic companies in Britain and other European Union states have been cleverly positioning their regional headquarters in the handful of member states with the lowest corporate tax rates.

For example Apple, Inc. (AAPL) made an estimated £6B ($9.50B USD) in Britain last year, but paid only £10M ($15.8M USD) in taxes. That astounding figure, which has many British natives grumbling, comes thanks to the British tax code's rule that largely exempts companies based in Ireland from paying British taxes.

Apple has installed its regional headquarters in Cork, Republic of Ireland. Thus it enjoys the low Irish 12.5 percent tax rate (which the British newspapers consider "ultra-low", but is ironically in line with the aforementioned current effective American rate for Fortune 500 firms), versus the 24 percent it would pay in Britain.

The Irish branch of Apple -- a subsidiary itself -- runs a series of shell companies that log British sales in "tax haven" regions like Ireland or the British Virgin Islands despite the fact that the physical point of sales is in Britain. Apple Retail UK Ltd -- one of these shell companies -- made a reported £500M ($791.8M USD) in 2010, but only paid £3.79M ($6.0M USD) in taxes.

Experts cited in a report by The Daily Mail estimate that of the $99.8B USD (£63B) Apple made globally in 2011, 10 percent of it came from the UK.

Apple's loyal legion dutifully lines up for the iPad launch in London. Apple is estimated to have to have only paid $15M USD in UK taxes, despite earning almost $10B USD from the island nation. [Image Source: Tim Ferguson/silicon.com]

This figure is hinted at in Apple's U.S. tax filings. While Apple pays well above the current hyper-evasive rate of the Fortune 500, it only paid an effective rate of 25.3 percent -- below the supposed tax rate of 35 percent. Apple credits this good fortune to "undistributed foreign earnings", which it plans to hold "indefinitely". Such commentary might draw greater scrutiny by auditors in the U.S., except that Apple wisely based its U.S. financial operations in Nevada -- a state known for a lax approach to tax enforcement.

Apple, which recently announced a dividend for shareholders, is hoarding $97.6B USD (£60B) in cash -- more money than the entire gross domestic product of Serbia. Valued at $590B USD (£370B), Apple is the world's most valuable company, and some experts it expect it to soon become the world's first company to be valued at a trillion USD.

The situation for Apple could soon be changing -- the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS), has reportedly audited the company's 2007 to 2009 figures and has "suggested" "certain adjustments". Those adjustments could be in the form of forcing Apple to pay millions in unpaid taxes -- either to Britain's HM Revenue & Customs or to the U.S. IRS.

II. Apple is Not Alone, U.S. Companies Enjoying Field Day of Tax Evasion

While Apple draws the brunt of the scrutiny given that as the world's largest and most valuable corporation it is a beacon of corporatism, other American companies are following in a similar line.

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) has placed its headquarters in the tiny European Union nation of Luxembourg -- the same nation where deceased North Korean tyrant Kim Jong Il reportedly sheltered his $4B USD fortune. Google Inc. (GOOG) -- makers of the world's most used smartphone operating system and the world's most used search engine -- based itself in Ireland and has subsidiaries in the Caribbean and Luxembourg for more tax dodging gains.

Google told The Daily Mail that this scheme -- which many would call "tax dodging" -- is necessary in today's corporate atmosphere, as responsibility to shareholders. States a Google spokesperson, "We have an obligation to our shareholders to set up a tax-efficient structure, and our present structure is compliant with the tax rules in all the countries where we operate."

Google also successfully dodged British taxes. [Image Source: Main Device]

In the U.S., Britain, and other wealthy nation states, change over such inequity is slow coming. After all, increasingly corporations are responsible of paying federal candidates' way into office -- regardless of their political affiliation. In office, these candidates inevitably look to serve their masters -- not the populous, but the corporations.

You're ignoring the fact that for a company to make money they need healthy, productive workers. What makes healthy, productive workers? A country with a strong infrastructure and good social services. Wealth is literally the concentrated surplus value extracted by Capital from Labor, since it owns the means of production. Your post also ignores the concept of Marginal Utility, in that poor people tend to spend all the money they get on things they need, whereas wealthy people can only buy so many boats and cars and vacation homes in the Bahamas. Our economy is built on the demand provided by working class America and a flat tax is going to crater that demand by either taking a huge amount of money out of the economy that is provided in the form of government services, or put an undue burden on the lower classes of American society, leaving them less money to spend on goods and services. When demand collapses and the government doesn't step into correct things, the economy ends up in a deflationary spiral, due to the vicious cycle of employers laying off workers because no one is buying their products, those laid off workers not buying anything, which further reduces demand, etc etc etc. This deflation of both the economy and the currency helps no one but the very wealthy.

You're making a faulty moral judgement with your claims of "fairness". How is multi-generational capital accumulation fair? How is it fair that someone can be born a billionaire while other people are doomed to a life of poverty based on who's vagina they popped out of? The number one determiner of how much money you have in America today is how much money your parents have. Economic mobility and equality goes down with flattened tax brackets, not up. Look at Scandinavia for example. They have some of the highest marginal tax rates in the world, yet they have amongst the highest levels of economic equality and mobility in their society.

quote: You're ignoring the fact that for a company to make money they need healthy, productive workers

How many? ALL of them?

[quote]What makes healthy, productive workers? A country with a strong infrastructure and good social services.[/quote]And our country has neither of those, nor any indication that we're trending towards either.

[quote]Wealth is literally the concentrated surplus value extracted by Capital from Labor, since it owns the means of production.[/quote]No, that is not literally what wealth is. Wealth is mere abundance of resources. Labor is one resource, as is the value extracted from that labor.

[quote] Your post also ignores the concept of Marginal Utility, in that poor people tend to spend all the money they get on things they need, whereas wealthy people can only buy so many boats and cars and vacation homes in the Bahamas.[/quote]Your post ASSUMES I ignore anything. Wealthy people buying so many boats and cars and vacation homes in the Bahamasa helps employ... other wealthy people?

The rest of your post is just pontificating jingoism. Enjoy your audience of one.