Science fails to exclude God

I see that all things still work to the glory of God. I think you may want to check out my new thread. It sheds light on just what exactly science is
doing to refute(or more appropriately, prove) the accuracy of the biblical worldview.

Originally posted by randyvs
I have to wonder why this is such an obsession with some scientists ? They seem driven/determined that religion
steps on the toes of science. No matter how many times, in how many ways, they are reminded that God is not
responsible for religion. Religion being from man, Christ being of the Father.

I am further amazed that so many creationists fail to exclude other religions. What if evolution is wrong? Why does the alternative have to be Jesus?
Why not Islam? or Hinduism?

Originally posted by randyvs
I have to wonder why this is such an obsession with some scientists ? They seem driven/determined that religion
steps on the toes of science. No matter how many times, in how many ways, they are reminded that God is not
responsible for religion. Religion being from man, Christ being of the Father.

I am further amazed that so many creationists fail to exclude other religions. What if evolution is wrong? Why does the alternative have to be Jesus?
Why not Islam? or Hinduism?

I thought I excluded other religions rather well.. Thus, it is
not Science fails to exclude religion. The title is, 'Science fails to exclude God. As in creator If your religion is Islam or Buddhism and your God
qualifies in your belief as the Creator ?
We're still talking about God. Buddhism might be left hanging. I believe there must be a Creator so the Biblical God works for me. To answer your
question. Common sense.

Originally posted by randyvs
I have to wonder why this is such an obsession with some scientists ? They seem driven/determined that religion
steps on the toes of science. No matter how many times, in how many ways, they are reminded that God is not
responsible for religion. Religion being from man, Christ being of the Father.

I am further amazed that so many creationists fail to exclude other religions. What if evolution is wrong? Why does the alternative have to be Jesus?
Why not Islam? or Hinduism?

I thought I excluded other religions rather well.. Thus, it is
not Science fails to exclude religion. The title is, 'Science fails to exclude God. As in creator If your religion is Islam or Buddhism and your God
qualifies in your belief as the Creator ?
We're still talking about God. Buddhism might be left hanging. I believe there must be a Creator so the Biblical God works for me. To answer your
question. Common sense.

Its "common sense" that if there must be a creator then it must be the christian creator?

Its "common sense" that if there must be a creator then it must be the christian creator?

Common now, is that what I said ?

Is Buddha a Creator God ? I'm not even sure myself so that is a question. If he is not worshipped as such by Buddhists ? Then how can Buddhism be one
of the," Other religions " that could be refered to rather than the
Christian God. Islam certainly could be one, but for me I reference the God in the Bible. See just because I reference what I believe to be true about
God. Dosn't mean I've excluded the God of the Quran. How can people,
person or priest even say they are not one in the same ? K ? So for the sake of simplificattion the subject is
the Creator. God. what or who ever he may be when the truth is revealed at last.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.