Latasa Womens Buckle and Strap Laceup Chunky Oxford Boots Black AAJZw

listing images were taken of actual products, however, actual color may differs slightly because of different monitor display setting.

LaunchDarkly Developer Documentation

Get started in under 30 minutes.LaunchDarkly provides feature flags as a service for Java · Python · Ruby · Go · Node.js · PHP · .NET. Control feature launches -- who sees what and when -- without multiple code deploys. Easy dashboard for phased rollouts, targeting and segmenting.Need more help? write us at support@launchdarkly.com

Mainers visiting the Spotsylvania Court House battlefield will find no monuments dedicated to Pine Tree State regiments. A few Union monuments stand here; the first encountered by visitors is the John Sedgwick monument at the intersection of Brock Road and Grant Drive. The low-key monument marks the spot where the Sixth Corps commander offered himself one time too many times as a target to Confederate sharpshooters.

Located at the intersection of Brock Road and Grant Drive in Spotsylvania County, Va. is the Spotsylvania Battlefield Exhibit Shelter. Maintained by the National Park Service and occasionally staffed by a park ranger, the shelter contains maps and information detailing the May 8-21, 1864 Battle of Spotsylvania Court House. Many Maine soldiers fought in this two-week bloodbath. (Brian Swartz Photo)

The greatest concentration of monuments, both North and South, exists at the Bloody Angle, a charnel house historically submerged by the lesser slaughter at Antietam’s Sunken Lane in September 1862. That bloody encounter was over in a few hours; the personalized murder at the Bloody Angle dragged on for 22 hours.

So if no Maine monuments stand at Spotsylvania Court House, then no Maine soldiers fought here, visitors might assume.

They would be incorrect. Great violence occurred across this bucolic landscape southwest of Fredericksburg – and Maine boys were in the thick of it.

Union Gen. John Sedgwick commanded the Sixth Corps of the Army of the Potomac during the opening days of the Battle of Spotsylvania Court House. On May 9, 1864, as his men fought from behind their entrenchments facing Confederate-held Laurel Hill, Sedgwick moved along the lines and encouraged his soldiers. A Confederate sniper shot Sedgwick dead; in May 1887 the survivors of the Sixth Corps erected this monument in honor of their beloved commander. The Sedgwick Monument is the first monument encountered by modern visitors to the battlefield. (Brian Swartz Photo)

A national park preserves the key features of Spotsylvania Court House: Laurel Hill, the Mule Shoe, and the Confederate trenches extending east to modern Route 208. Most visitors overlook Laurel Hill, which lies across from Grant Drive on a dangerous-for-pedestrians curve of the well-traveled Brock Road. Until the field grass reaches an adequate height each spring, the mown trails are not clearly marked.

Visitors may not understand that the main component of the preserved battlefield is the Mule Shoe, the heavily fortified salient that Robert E. Lee ordered built during the battle’s early stages. Grant Drive “enters” the Mule Shoe near the Bloody Angle; Gordon Drive (named for Confederate Gen. John B. Gordon) “exits” the salient at its “East Face.” There are several places where visitors can park their cars and walk along the trenches; do stay on the marked trails — or at least do not walk on the surviving Confederate trenches.

Enter the content. You can pause, rewind and skip back while transcribing.

Click
Stop
when you have completed an entry. The end time is added to the
Timespan
field.

Continue playing and stopping until you have transcribed the required content.

(Optional) If you want to add a row for a specific section of the media, click and drag on the timeline to select the timespan.

On the
Layout
tab, in the
Rows Columns
group, click
Insert
, and then click
Insert Row
.

You can add multiple entries of equal duration—this is useful when you want to divide the media into sections and enter notes about each section.

Click in the transcript.

On the
Layout
tab, in the
Rows Columns
group, click
Insert
, and then click
Insert Rows
.

The
Add Transcript Entries
dialog box opens.

In the
Add transcript rows of duration
field enter duration of each entry—for example, enter
2:00
to create entries of two minutes duration.

In the
From start time
field, enter the start time for the transcript entries—for example, enter
00:00:00
to start adding entries from the start of the audio or video file.

In the
To end time
field, enter the end time of the final entry—for example, enter
00:15:00
to end the final entry at 15 minutes.

Click
OK
.

You can add custom fields (columns) to the transcripts in your project. For example—you might want to record respondent's name, setting or whatever suits your research.

Click the
File
tab and then click
Project Properties
.

The
Project Properties
dialog box opens.

Click the
Audio/Video
tab.

Under
Custom Transcript Fields
, click the
Audio
or
Video
tab.

Click the
New
button.

Enter a name for the new field.

When you add custom fields, they are added to all transcripts in the project. If you want custom fields to be available for all future projects, add them in the
Audio/Video
tab of
Application Options
.

Replicated databases.
The Bitcoin Blockchain ecosystem acts like a network of replicated databases, each containing the same list of past bitcoin transactions. Important members of the network are called validators or nodes which pass around transaction data (payments) and block data (additions to the ledger). Each validator independently checks the payment and block data being passed around. There are rules in place to make the network operate as intended.

Replicated databases.

Bitcoin’s complexity comesfrom its ideology.
The aim of bitcoin was to be decentralised, i.e. not have a point of control, and to be relatively anonymous. This has influenced how bitcoin has developed. Not all blockchain ecosystems need to have the same mechanisms, especially if participants can be identified and trusted to behave.

Bitcoin’s complexity comesfrom its ideology.

Here’s how bitcoin approaches some of the decisions:

Public vs privateblockchains

There is a big difference in what technologies you need, depending on whether you allow
anyone
to write to your blockchain, or known, vetted participants. Bitcoin in theory allows
anyone
to write to its ledger (but in practice, only about 20 people/groups actually do).

Public blockchains.
Ledgers can be ‘public’ in two senses:

Public blockchains.

Usually, when people talk about
public
blockchains, they mean anyone-can-write.

Because bitcoin is designed as a ‘anyone-can-write’ blockchain, where participants aren’t vetted and can add to the ledger without needing approval, it needs ways of arbitrating discrepancies (there is no ‘boss’ to decide), and defence mechanisms against attacks (anyone can misbehave with relative impunity, if there is a financial incentive to do so). These create cost and complexity to running this blockchain.

Private blockchains.
Conversely, a ‘private’ blockchain network is where the participants are known and trusted: for example, an industry group, or a group of companies owned by an umbrella company. Many of the mechanisms aren’t needed – or rather they are replaced with legal contracts – “You’ll behave because you’ve signed this piece of paper.”. This changes the technical decisions as to which bricks are used to build the solution.

Private blockchains.

Another way of describing public/private might be permissionless vs permissioned or pseudonymous vs identified participants.

Warning: this section isn’t so gentle, as it goes into detailinto each of the elementsabove. I recommend getting a cup of tea.

A blockchain is just a file.
A blockchain by itself is just a data structure. That is, how data is logically put together and stored. Other data structures are databases (rows, columns, tables), text files, comma separated values (csv), images, lists, and so on. You can think of a blockchain competing most closely with a database.