Of the twenty-one members of the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff, twelve(12) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 57%. Of the eleven(11) members of the Southern Poverty Law Center board of directors, six(6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 55%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* This means that Jews are over-represented on the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff by a factor of 28.5 times, or 2,850 percent, and over-represented on the Southern Poverty Law Center board of directors by a factor of 27.5 times, or 2,750 percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews on the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff and board of directors cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the United States population could so dominate America's leading "civil rights" organization.

Of the twenty-one members of the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff, twelve(12) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 57%. Of the eleven(11) members of the Southern Poverty Law Center board of directors, six(6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 55%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* This means that Jews are over-represented on the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff by a factor of 28.5 times, or 2,850 percent, and over-represented on the Southern Poverty Law Center board of directors by a factor of 27.5 times, or 2,750 percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews on the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff and board of directors cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the United States population could so dominate America's leading "civil rights" organization.

Looks just like the people when you go to Century City, Kalifornia
Century City is a mega-mall & mega-business epicenter for Hollywierd, Beverly Hills, Brentwood, Malibu, Downtown LA, Wilshire District, the olde Robertson shuls, all clustered to make and take money there.
Excellent Research though. Much appreciated, but kinda sickening
Never saw all this info with photos and bios in one place.

Excellent piece of work..I've never figured out why the Southern Poverty Law Center exists, other than to discredit WNs. What about the Northern Poverty Law Center, or the Western Poverty Law Center? To be "fair" they should cover the entire country.

The SPLC couldn't be more unnecessary in America 2010. Don't worry, SPLC, we barbaric Whites aren't going to assault a Negro. Quite the other way around, actually, and has been for quite a very long time. Not that facts would carry any weight with the fine folks for truth and justice at the SPLC.

We need a MWALC. Minority White American Law Center for the many areas of America where we've found ourselves far out numbered by other ethnic groups.

But, as long as it is racism and discrimination directed toward Whites, such as the SPLC propogates on a daily basis, then it's just A-OK!

I want to thank you Zog.gov for this fine piece of research.
I have copied and sent it to two of my former Jewish college level teachers.

The subject of what members of SF or WNs can do to help promote the cause occasionally arises. Folks may suggest that some form of violence is the only way to prevent the US from falling under total Zionist control, if it isn't already.

While it is likely that many of these suggestions are posted so that law enforcement can see who will take the bait (for future reference) , it is also possible that many actual patriots think something along those lines out of pure frustration. What they seldom mention is exactly who or what the target of such an action would be aimed at. There is no particular person or persons whose demise would solve anything.

There is no such singular target since the enemies of the constitution and of gentiles live among us incognito for the most part. Anyway, I for one do not harbor such an animosity towards an individual simply because of the circumstances of their birth. Besides that, there are many white gentiles who for one reason or another, money or even actual conviction, who aid, are in favor of, or do not mind Jewish hegemony.

Jewish rule wouldn't be such a problem if they were half as wise and benevolent as they pretend to be. I fear they are not.

Since an actual revolt is prohibitive for many reasons, legal, moral, etc and etc, one viable alternative would be to not only print and disseminate educational material such as you have provided, but also to present these facts to all sectors of society, including the Jewish members of our communities.

Since information like that which you have given is all factual there is no moral or legal reason why one should fear presenting it to friends and acquaintances regardless of their race or religion.

A reasonable person confronted with fact rather than mere opinion should have no reason to be alarmed or offended so long as the material is presented in a non-threatening, non-combative way. After all, it is not our wish to do harm to Jews or other ethnic minorities, only to call attention to to the inconsistencies in the positions assumed by some of these so called civil rights advocates and their actual practices. A similar analysis can be done with the political and economic agendas they promote.

In this particular case, the very group which has advocated quotas and decried the racism of white male gentiles is displaying a blatant tendency towards bias themselves. I'm sure our members could think of many such examples and point them out with hard facts and tempered emotions.

However, human nature being what it is, a rational presentation does not guarantee a rational response. I'm sure others here would agree that they would feel a great deal of discomfort or embarrassment to reveal their political, religious, and racial concerns to their acquaintances who happen to be Jewish, Mexican, or Negro. But why should they be? Are these not reasonable people who mean us no harm?

I don't see how we can afford to continue in silence or to discuss these issues only amongst ourselves since we are already mostly in agreement.
There is no reason why white gentile men should not be able to openly and without fear of reprisal state exactly how they feel as long as they do not voice an intent to do harm. A true friend would understand this. Only an oppressor would have your very thoughts censored. Only a dictator would silence your right to speak a civil concern.

Can we afford to wait to speak frankly and publicly?

If there is reason that we should fear bodily harm for merely stating facts and expressing our concerns about them then I take that as a sign that there is censorship already, that those who would do us harm for speaking the truth are not interested in rational dialogue, and that further delay is only allowing the further consolidation of power in the hands of those who are little more than high classed gangsters. Is this the case?

If what I have to show these "friends" of mine is offensive to them in any way, all they have to do is say so and I will refrain from communicating with them. If they refuse to entertain my point of view, then I no longer feel obliged to entertain theirs. There are times when what one refuses to say can say as much as what one could say if permitted.

If we reach an impasse or if peaceful dialogue is broken off, let it be due to their wishes and not ours. If such people only act according to the power of money or force then we know that their principles do not encompass any others.

If there are those who would destroy me socially, economically, or kill me bodily because I would resist tyranny, then I would prefer they do it sooner than later.

Excellent work, thanks.
However, it seems like some of the profiles are no longer available on $PlC site, namely that of the Wang's, Hackley's and several others'.
And although I appreciate you going extra mile to post the photos, perhaps you should not have done so in regards to Beirich. I mean, I'm already surrounded by Jewish sows at my workplace as it is, and having to see them all week long isn't exactly a pleasant experience. And seeing yet another one on the computer at home, just when I thought I was safe