Avid fan of Android, 19 May 2010Tattoo is a low-end phone and this is not, so this wildfire makes a much better choice. Also, ... moreHTC wildfire WILL NOT get v2.2. look at the processor..
whilst for i5700, not only it's void of m/touch, it also lack Sense UI which the best mark of all HTC phones.

I am currently in san jose ...basically from India ,I was in search of a good phone,can anyone suggest me where will i get the best buy,I will here only for short term..is it worth buying here in US compared to india.

at first glance seems an OK phone, though it could put a better processor ... But a phone is designed for the middle class, created for people who want a phone operating system but have not a lot of money .... and for secondary videocall camera would be useless in romania ... goodbye!

uday, 18 May 2010listen guys i have my b'day coming up and i have an option on buying this phone or i pod touch... moreMy friend, I personally would choose the phone. You have more option and you can download applications fron Android Market. Peace

Ace, 19 May 2010@uday: i dunno about this phone man, but i have a 64gb ipod touch 3rd generation...and i simpl... morethanx ace i would consider ur opinion on the 64gb besides this phone has a long waste to go before it comes to india
regards uday.

@uday: i dunno about this phone man, but i have a 64gb ipod touch 3rd generation...and i simply love it. once you jail break an ipod...you can do anything wit it! playing games on it is just simply awesome. i would go for a mid ranged phone, like the nokia x3 and the ipod touch.

Tattoo is a low-end phone and this is not, so this wildfire makes a much better choice. Also, wildfire carries the newer os and since its a new phone, its highly likely to be upgraded to Froyo 2.2 in the future, which is actually a very big upgrade.

If battery is your main concern and you don't mind getting a lower-end phone, you can consider samsung I7500, its battery last for about 3 days w moderate usage and its screen is a lot nicer than tattoo's, processer is 800 mHz, which is jus 200 mHz short of that of HTC Desire. Only letdown is tt it doesn't support multi-touch.

uday, 18 May 2010listen guys i have my b'day coming up and i have an option on buying this phone or i pod touch... moreThis phone looks great, but just disappointed with 240x320 pixels. Should have been much better. Battery life seems to be very good

uday, 18 May 2010listen guys i have my b'day coming up and i have an option on buying this phone or i pod touch... morethe i- touch is not a phone having said that lets say for arguments sake we were to compare it to the iPhone (which is!) Firstly, the Apple O/S is easier to use than Android, the typing on the itouch is easier and that's where the buck stops, the HTC Desire or Wildfire would leave the itouch/iphone standing, the HTC has the SnapDragon 1GHz Processor, had better display better sound, more reliable protocol and messaging and is built much much better, the i-Touch has a disasterous build with a pro-scratch ultra sensitive rear surface panel. I'd opt for the HTC but would hope the GUI improves.

I dont get why HTC is releasing one Android phone average once a month with all similar design and almost similar specs?
I have used the Hero earlier and really dont think its great leap forward compared to WINMO. well maybe you can even set your own home screen, but what else is new?
Has the Bluetooth problem been fixed?
Somebody tell me whats so special about Android.

Anonymous, 18 May 2010Low resolution screen equals less cpu speed required equals a very cheap phone for the teenagers.Screen size won't affect CPU usage at all. Resolution may (possibly die to the graphics chip having to render more pixels) but physical screen size will affect nothing more than the battery life.