Serious discussion is something you shy away from. Every time evidence is posted to refute your so called "truth", you conveniently ignore and start name calling. I especially love the "radio Zackheim" comment in an attempt to equate me with a jewish propoganda service.

My posts have shown logic and dilligent research. You just don't want to admit or read them because they throw your theory into the light which it belongs... crackpot conspiracy. If my posts have nothing but "incoherent ravings", I challenge you to find one and post it. Im sure, like every other post I've made to refute you, you will simply ignore this one and go back to your little name calling session hoping enough time will pass that everyone reading this thread and myself will simply forget about the challenges put in front of you to prove your evidence/refute my research to get yourself off the hook.

For the umpteenth time, I'll ask you again. If my research is so wrong and fallacious why don't you disect it and provide tangible evidence and research of your own to refute it? If you're so worried about the truth, then you should have nop problem in doing the same thing I did to your research. However, it is apparent to even an idiot child all you're doing is using typical jew stall tactics and emoptional pleas to try to win an indefensible argument.

And while your mental capacity obviously limits you to thinking that a thought out and well spoken post is tantamount to "incoherent ravings", I assure you there are quite a few others who disagree.

And by the way I can only assume the Three Stooges (all jews) reference pic in your post is a relation to the three conspiracy theorists who keep this alive by ignoring evidence put in front of them, as there only seem to be two (Ace and myself) who still are posting to fight this lunacy you speak.

Tweedle dee and Tweedle dum. My best guess is that ace ventura is on the payroll and you are just his dupe.
The only 'evidence' posted by Tweedle di' has been government propaganda.
So: Patriot act, irrelevent or very bad thing?

Ace, based on your pictures, where are the wings? They didn't tear through the building like the fuselage appears to have. Did they break off and remain in front of the building? If so, where are the pictures of 2 broken wings? Or did they fold back yet remain attached to join the fuselage on its trip through steel reinforced concrete?

Seconds after impact, no wings here. So that suggests they folded back and went with the fuselage, right?

Tweedle dee and Tweedle dum. My best guess is that ace ventura is on the payroll and you are just his dupe.
The only 'evidence' posted by Tweedle di' has been government propaganda.
So: Patriot act, irrelevent or very bad thing?

Man, the US Government is really bad at these conspiracy cover-ups. First the moon, then JFK, then 9/11. You'd think they'd get the hint not to conspire to fake such world-renowned events when they can't even manage to figure out the small details Joe Average sees blatantly.

I mean, you could see the strings on those airlines! Fake. At least when the Canadian government covers something up, nobody knows about it, ever. Remember the Polar Bear Massacre of '95? No? Because the Canadians don't want you to.

edit: Ruthlessly reposted from an original posting by Revolution's Beginnings.

Tweedle dee and Tweedle dum. My best guess is that ace ventura is on the payroll and you are just his dupe.
The only 'evidence' posted by Tweedle di' has been government propaganda.
So: Patriot act, irrelevent or very bad thing?

So I guess anything posted that doesn't come from any of your approved conspiracy theory websites is all government run. I don't know what I was thinking. Next time I'll be sure all my evidence is kosher approved by your jew conspiracy theorists.

Ace, based on your pictures, where are the wings? They didn't tear through the building like the fuselage appears to have. Did they break off and remain in front of the building? If so, where are the pictures of 2 broken wings? Or did they fold back yet remain attached to join the fuselage on its trip through steel reinforced concrete?

Seconds after impact, no wings here. So that suggests they folded back and went with the fuselage, right?

Nope. For the most part the wings shattered on impact. The center section, reinforced for mounting the enignes and loaded with fuel was more "solid" than the empty wingtips and breached the outer wall of the Pentagon.

As for debris here is a photo showing possible remnants of the wingtips.

One should note that non-reinforced aluminum has a tendency to shatter when impacting a solid surface at high speeds.

Man, the US Government is really bad at these conspiracy cover-ups. First the moon, then JFK, then 9/11. You'd think they'd get the hint not to conspire to fake such world-renowned events when they can't even manage to figure out the small details Joe Average sees blatantly.

I mean, you could see the strings on those airlines! Fake. At least when the Canadian government covers something up, nobody knows about it, ever. Remember the Polar Bear Massacre of '95? No? Because the Canadians don't want you to.

Shows how smart you are, Kennedy was shot in '63 and the moon landing was '69. israel says they never knew the USS Liberty was American when they shot holes in it and killed 34 sailors. Everyone on SF knows that was a lie. Do you believe the 'official' story on that one too? Let's see if you can answer that, molepie.

So I guess anything posted that doesn't come from any of your approved conspiracy theory websites is all government run. I don't know what I was thinking. Next time I'll be sure all my evidence is kosher approved by your jew conspiracy theorists.

Shattered and vanished? In the photo you just showed, tiny scraps are pointed out as "possible" debris from the wings. You would think that something as big as two airliner wings would leave behind larger pieces.