3. Takes note of the extensive and detailed observation, monitoring, analysis and research to develop an understanding of the complexmicro-biological and climatic dynamics of the Lascaux cave as a means to fully understand the causes of the surface decay;

4. Welcomes the fact that during 2009, there were almost no adverse changes to the surface of the cave, but notes, however, that during October 2009 the limited presence of apparently new vermiculations was noted and mapped;

5. Also notes the progress made with respect to the development of a formal communication strategy to enable the conservation approaches to be fully and widely understood and urges the State Party to begin this programme with appropriate scientific advice;

6. Further notes the new management arrangements which separate scientific research and administrative functions;

7. Acknowledges the progress with the isolation of the hill, through proposals to move car parking and acquire land into State ownership;

8. Reiterates its request that the Protocol on Intervention that has been developed should be made public, as this could be used as a best practice example for other similar properties;

9. Also reiterates the need for the development of a formal communication strategy and the need for the Scientific Council to formulate the priorities adopted into a detailed action plan with a timeframe for the next three years;

10. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2011, a progress report on the state of conservation of the property with respect to the points above and on progress made in the creation of the above-mentioned action plan, for the examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session in 2011.