This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

Again, you are pretty much wrong. During the Civil War and up to WWI, men could be imprisoned. Things changed after that and until the draft ended conscientious objectors were not imprisoned. So...your example of the government forcing men to bear arms hasn't been a reality for almost 100 years.

FFS, dude, conscription was forcing citizens to bear arms and objector status was VERY limited. Beyond that, if you objected on the field, you could be executed. Your argument is completely ignoring the vast general principle.

The Supreme Court did nothing to establish any right to health care.

Straw, your argument was that the forcing of medical insurance purchase (consuming) was unconstitutional. It is not.

Quit with the wormy argument.

Originally Posted by trouble13

If you wanna know why Trumpsters are ignoring you its for the same reason you ignored the KKKs complaints about Obama.

FFS, dude, conscription was forcing citizens to bear arms and objector status was VERY limited. Beyond that, if you objected on the field, you could be executed. Your argument is completely ignoring the vast general principle.

Straw, your argument was that the forcing of medical insurance purchase (consuming) was unconstitutional. It is not.

Quit with the wormy argument.

I never said it was unconstitutional. I said the Democrats turned the Constitution on its head by passing a law.

This is what you said:
Again, if you think that the constitution was turned upside down, then you are ignoring the ruling on the individual mandate.

You are still worming....and diverting from the point....but that is what one does when they have a losing argument.

Your debate and technique is a waste of time.

Ummm....yes...I said forcing has nothing to do with medical workers, but medical insurance consumers. Is that statement incorrect?

And, in my opinion, the Constitution was stood on its head by the passage of the law. I said nothing about the Supreme Court's ruling. I said nothing about whether the law has been deemed constitutional.

Look...I get so many liberals...and some non-liberals...who respond to me based on something I didn't say. Please don't be one of them.