Translate

Pengikut

Total Tayangan Halaman

Nikon V1 verses Canon Powershot G1X

Info Media Photo : As the camera companies put more attention to the future they look to
the new models with much bigger sensors than any of the
point-and-shoots of the past, anywhere from 5-7 times the size of most
point-and-shoot models. To be sure this isn’t a totally new thing. Leica
has always made these cameras, but they use a different focusing system
(Rangefinder), are handmade and cost a fortune. This is good news for
photographers of all levels on a lot of fronts. The camera companies had
to do something to compete against the exponential expansion cell phone
camera use.

It took awhile for the big companies to come around to the trend, a
couple of years. In my last article about mirrorless cameras I reported
that Panasonic, Olympus, Sony and Samsung were the only companies that
made the beasts. Now that Nikon and Canon have jumped on board the trend
has solidified. The real question is will this turn out to be a new
technology revolution that causes the slow demise of the dSLR.

At last, Canon enters the a new point-and-shoot camera to the market
and they’re doing with a bang, introducing the Canon Powershot G1X with a
large sensor (13.2mm x 8.8mm) that is bigger than the one on the Nikon
V1/J1. In the sensor size category, this gives Canon a one-up on
Nikon’s. Caveat of this camera: no interchangeable lenses, making the
in-camera lens it does have worth an extra look.

Canon, however is left behind, releasing this camera instead of a
mirrorless one like other companies have. Technically as far as I can
see a mirrorless camera has to have interchangeable lenses something
that Canon’s model does not have and Nikon’s does, therefore the new
big-sensored Canon is not of the mirrorless variety. Nikon wins the
interchagable lens option round by a big margin.

The Canon G1X in-camera lens is 15mmX60mm or 28mm – 112mm 35 mm
equivalent and f/2.8 to f/5.8 aperture, not a great lens for wide-angle
architecture shots, but just fine according to Canon’s press release
about it: “Utilizing Ultra high refractive index Aspherical (UA)
elements and precision glass moulding technology, the lens achieves both
a compact size and pin-sharp clarity for the most discerning of
photographers.” (All they’re saying there is that the lens is specially
made to reduce spherical and other aberrations.)

Both cameras can produce Raw files, making editing details less
comprising for the photo, but have different aspect ratio (the
proportions of the size of the image). The Nikon produces a 3:2 ratio,
the same as most dSLR cameras. The Nikon, a 4:3 aspect ratio the same as
most point and shoots and micro-four-thirds cameras (another type of
mirrorless).

There’s a big difference in resolution, too. The Nikon has 10.1 MP
and the Canon a 14.3 MP sensor. In terms of picture quality, this leaves
the Nikon at a moderate disadvantage. If you weigh its smaller sensor
size, which is significantly important for a sharp image at 100 %
resolution and its lower resolution, it is a double-whammy signal of a
lesser quality picture. The Canon’s bigger sensor and higher resolution
is the winner overall. If it only had interchangeable lenses it’d be
perfect!

1 komentar:

Anonim
mengatakan...

She has princess die, but were all princess high," Mother Monster tweeted. The support provided the manufactures of Free to air receivers would teach you step by step how to use your free to air Receiver. The more comfortable we are in talking dirty to our partner the more intimate it becomes and with that your inhibitions will drop.