Child porn victims seek multimillion-dollar payouts

The Register

"Each and every redistribution of the images causes a distinct injury to the victim," Marsh told The Register. "It's a very deliberate act that they choose when they go seek images of my client out."

Marsh and other child victim advocates argue that the requirement to prove the convicted person proximately caused the damages, applies only to this last catchall item. The other losses need only be established by a preponderance of the evidence, which is almost always satisfied by a conviction that includes one or more images of the victim.

Client Testimonials

“I want to thank you for all of your much needed legal expertise that helped me navigate through an overwhelming system with my daughter. I’m grateful she has you and your firm fighting for her throughout this nightmare. It levels the playing field a little somewhat by making sure her voice will no longer go unheard. Thank you for your light in all of this darkness.”