Annakarinaland

2015-05-20

The last "Film International" issue that published my work, and one of the last created by former submissions editor, Liza Palmer. The title of this issue (Erotic, silent, dead) is prophetic, symbolizingthe pendulum of thanatos and eros inherent in the representation of women in film.

This is a repost of an article on "Film International" (FINT) from August 2014 primarily because the only response to it by the current editor in chief Daniel Lindvall was to request a correction about his attendance at a 2004 film conference in London. This is when the new FINT was introduced by Intellect, its publishing house. Secondly, because at the 2015 Cannes Film Festival, something is finally being done about the underrepresentation of women in film. This was raised by Jane Campion at last year's festival which I wrote about, an article that "Film International" rejected. This year at Cannes there were seminars with women in film sponsored by the festival and different cultural organisations (Créteil Films de Femmes organized one event on May 18). It is exciting to learn at these meetings that the Bechdel test is now used in many countries today, a test that is an index of how women are represented in film. The theatre operator of "Bio Rio" in Stockholm where the Bechdel test was first launched in Sweden, Ellen Tejle, was at the May 18th meeting. Daniel Lindvall agrees with the test but argues that some films that pass the test "aren't good enough"."The Bechdel Test, sometimes called the Mo Movie Measure or Bechdel Rule is a simple test which names the following three criteria: (1) it has to have at least two women in it, who (2) who talk to each other, about (3) something besides a man. The test was popularized by Alison Bechdel's comic Dykes to Watch Out For, in a 1985 strip called The Rule. For a nice video introduction to the subject please check out The Bechdel Test for Women in Movies on feministfrequency.com."Both the underrepresentation of women in film and the Bechdel test, which has amplified this reality, continue to be relevant. And "Film International" continues to be a bastion of film criticism by men. Held to the same criteria of the Bechdel test for the presence of women in the publication, FINT would not pass.Original post, August 2014After almost 10 years of writing for "Film International", I will no longer submit film criticism or reports. Since 2014, the newly installed content editor, Jacob Mertens - a white male under 30 working under the editor in chief since 2004 Daniel Lindvall, wants webzine articles to be
'bloggish length', 500-750 words and doesn't want to edit content but
take in material ready to print. The distinction between a blog and a webzine has since been obliterated. Mertens is distinguished for publishing his own work and and the work of primarily male
writers. Liza Palmer, the previous FINT editor since 2003, resigned in May 2013 and was exceptionally adept in
printing articles about marginal representation and unique women film festivals
and film culture. Veteran writers prior to Mertens could suggest a topic and it was usually published. The reward for writing pieces requiring assembly in the FINT webzine, according to Mertens, is “being published’. Editorial work for him means 'coddling' writers. Editorial work for Mertens is just plain work that he doesn't want to do.

"At Intellect, we are committed to fostering original thought and widening critical debate in both emerging and established subjects. We offer an unbiased platform and are committed to representing our authors’ voices authentically, without imposition of personal ideas or opinions". Mark Lewis.

“Film International
(FINT) - Thinking Film Culture since 1973" – was originally published in Sweden (Filmhäftet. a high quality Swedish language print journal) but was adopted by Intellect Ltd. (UK) in
2003 and became an English language journal. Actually "Film International" can only claim the "Thinking Film Culture" part of their slogan from 2003, not earlier. Michael Tappert was the editor in chief of "Filmhäftet" from 1998-2002 and the new "Film International" from 2003-2004. The new format was announced at the Society for Cinema and Media Studies Conference in London in 2004 where "Intellect" was one of the exhibitors.
The mission statement of "Film International" is one and the same for all "Intellect" journals: "We wish to bridge the gap between the academy and the outside world, and encourage the participation of scholars from a variety of disciplines". "Intellect’s" managing
editor Mark Lewis, informed me that there are 22 male and 16 female editors for their
various journals of academic culture in popular media. FINT currently has two male content and review editors. There are very few women writers, especially those who focus on the matrix
of gender, race and class in the representation of women.

"Films and culture are biased in so many other ways, in favour of the middle-class, straight, white male and the glossy world-view of corporate capitalism".

Daniel Lindvall is a Marxist and Marxism’s
problematic relationship with feminism is well known. His key areas of interest are class, realism, modernism, the avant-garde, cultural politics, imperialism, and the labour movement. Gender is not on the list, nevertheless, he is aware of the right things to say about it: "Films and culture are biased in so many other ways, in favour of the middle-class, straight, white male....". This rather vacuous comment defines his editorial practice at FINT since Liza Palmer resigned. With Lindvall and Mertens now at the helm of FINT's content, the webzine/quarterly journal is an almost exclusively male bastion. Given the present editorial team, FINT is no longer a journal featuring significant contributions by women or about gender. It is important to continually update the status of today's film journals and webzines regarding gender representation.

In a
recent editorial in FINT, Lindvall identified himself as a supporter
of the gender equality program in Sweden for films screened in select theaters. The Bechdel Test is named after the lesbian graphic novelist Alison Bechdel,
where films involving two women who speak about something other than men on
screen receive an “A” equality stamp.
This stamp is visible for spectators of the screened film.
According to Lindvall, Bechdel is an "easy-to-use test that very clearly reveals the gender inequality in our film culture as a whole. The fact that little has changed, in terms of numbers, when it comes to female under-representation on the screen over the last six decades, is reason enough for me to support the use of the Bechdel test as a guideline by cinemas and public funding bodies alike". But there is a caveat: some of the films that pass the test aren't "good enough", he adds. To this kind of logic three Swedish women disagree, Anu Koivunen,Ingrid Ryberg and Laura Horak:

“Instead of rejecting the Bechdel test and the A rating as
simplistic, critics should focus on the obvious. What does it mean that, in
film, women can barely be imagined to have important things to say to each
other? Does this have anything to do with implicit criteria of quality and
taste? Why not take the challenge to push one's imagination outside the
conventions that come most easily to mind? This is a call for producers,
distributors, critics and audience alike”. The Guardian, Aug 27, 2013.

The real issue of the underrepresentation of women is a core issue today so the patronizing rhetoric of an armchair feminist such as Lindvall is counterproductive. At a Cannes Film Festival women in film seminar (2015) it was announced that the Bechdel test is now being use by many countries. Cannes gets very skirmish about this but basically does very little to change this. Since FINT has virtually no women writing in film any more or has a particular gender focus, the webzine does not pass the Bechdel test either Merten's content choices favor articles about male directors, by male writers. (See below for recent list).

FINT review editor Jacob Mertens bringing up gender bias is "petty"

Mertens does not acknowledge how demographics marginalize women writers at FINT. Both Mertens and Lindvall represent a paradigm shift in the quality of the journal since 2013 regarding the representation of women. The new FINT online site and journal can be more appropriately called "Film Culture since 2013 not 1973. Lindvall claims Mertens is "a much better writer and editor than most experienced and educated writers and editors with PhDs twice his age". (Mertens received his BA in Film Studies from University of North Carolina in 2012).

Is FINT oblivious is to its own middle class, straight, white male bias? When given the opportunity to address gender inequality, Lindvall ignores the under representation of women working in the male dominated world of film and film criticism.

Intellect's Mark Lewis, like Lindvall, supports a relatively inexperienced
editor while claiming that "Intellect" takes gender
discrimination questions “seriously’. We know how hard it is to prove gender inequality even when under representation is so glaringly apparent, but it is clear from recent correspondence with FINT,
that men support men - from writers, to editors, to publishers.

Before Liza Palmer resigned in May 2013, inequality was not an issue at FINT. Since Jacob Mertens took over, the five most recent festival
reports were written by men, the 10 most recent features were written by men
and of the 23 most recent online articles, only two were written by a woman.
I wrote 17 articles for FINT online last year,
all published by Mertens. Twelve of the articles were 'Cannes dailies', as well as four articles from the Venice Film Festival. This was probably one of the first times FINT did a daily Cannes chronicle and Mertens was excited about it. One
of my articles, accepted by Palmer , was never published in the FINT print journal; Mertens claimed it "fell through the cracks". This year, two online articles
from the Cannes Film Festival were accepted and not published. He claimed it was too much work for him but the reviews were about the sexism at Cannes and because of that , he wrote, "the question then becomes whether this is the right fit for your work". It has been for as long as Liza Palmer was editor but not since the webzine continues to feature a predominately male gaze.

I am member of FIPRESCI and the Swedish Film Critics Association and accredited film critic, such as at Cannes. I was a member of the Cannes Queer Palm Jury (2012) with Julie Gayet as president. An article on that experience was published by FINT under Liza Palmer. Other articles were published by Liza Palmer when the journal exemplified diversity.

The articles about sexism at the Cannes Film Festival and a focus on the contributions of women were excluded by Mertens. With Jane Campion at the helm this could at last be taken seriously. A review of Olivier Assayas’ film “Clouds of Sils Maria” (France 2014) , a complex meta-lesbian feature, was also rejected. Both were immediately published by Agnès Film.

Cannes seems able to justify that less than 10% for the official selection and only 20% of the films in other divisions are made
by women. The organizers claim they
take in "good films", not films based on gender. What then explains the invisibility or under representation of women at Cannes? Or that women make up less than 10% of the writers at FINT? When men are threatened by
challenges to their bias, they can always claim women are not good enough. As long as this practice continues, it is important to bring it out in the open.

FINT - MOST RECENT ARTICLES SINCE MAY 2013: (two articles written by women; Articles in red about male directors - 'Merten's male gaze'. Seven of the 23 films on this list were reviewed by Paul Risker.

Mertens claims that he wants a spectrum of topics and writers, a hodge podge of information. The feel of FINT nowadays conveys this recipe -- all except the 30% written by Risker.

FINT - MOST RECENT ARTICLES (two articles written by women) UPDATE 2015
Here is a list of the top 5 online articles, all written by men for "Film International":

The 2015 San Francisco International Festival ReportBy Mark James.The Agony of Woman in Gett: The Trial of Viviane AmsalemBy Christopher Sharrett.Steve Hoover and Danny Yourd on Crocodile Gennadiy: A
Tribeca InterviewA Place in Myth: Portia Doubleday on After the
Ball (2015)By Paul RiserNothing Lost in Times Regained: On the Restored Apu TrilogyBy Paul Riser

The present print issue written by two women, 14 men. Reads like a Cannes lineup.