All hope for Russia’s participation at Eurovision 2017 is now lost. Russian broadcaster Channel One has confirmed they will not broadcast this year’s contest, with Julia Samoylova still banned from Ukraine. At the same time, the EBU has revealed that Russia is “no longer able to take part in Eurovision 2017” as negotiations reached a stalemate.

Channel One’s full statement

The First Channel has received a letter from the European Broadcasting Union with the message that the EBU could not resolve the question of participation in Eurovision 2017 for the participant from Russia, Yulia Samoylova. This EBU report makes reference to the decision of the Ukrainian Security Services.

The First Channel finds the Ukrainian refusal completely unreasonable. The reason for it, of course, is Ukraine’s attempt to politicize the contest, whose goal throughout its 62-year history has been to unite people.

The European Broadcasting Union still offers the option of remote participation from Yulia Samoylova or her replacement with another participant. But First Channel has said both options are unacceptable.

A remote performance discriminates against the Russian participant and is contrary to the rules and principles of competition. Yulia Samoylova’s replacement with another artist, in our opinion, cannot even be considered.

In this situation, the First Channel does not consider it possible to broadcast the Eurovision Song Contest 2017.

Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs again made their stance clear this morning. In a tweet seen below, they explained that all participants are welcome — provided they “respect” Ukrainian law. The accompanying image specifically lists Julia as being barred from the country.

The EBU’s full statement on Russia at Eurovision 2017

Around 18:30 GMT, the EBU finally released its official statement via the Eurovision.tv web site, reiterating that its two options for Russia — a satellite performance or a new performer — had been rejected. The statement said:

“These proposals were to either take part via satellite or to change their chosen artist to one who could legally travel to Ukraine for the duration of the Contest. Sadly both proposals have been rejected by Channel One and they have now announced they do not intend to broadcast the Eurovision Song Contest 2017. Unfortunately this means Russia will no longer be able to take part in this year’s competition. We very much wanted all 43 countries to be able to participate and did all we could to achieve this.”

“We strongly condemn the Ukrainian authorities’ decision to impose a travel ban on Julia Samoylova as we believe it thoroughly undermines the integrity and non-political nature of the Eurovision Song Contest and its mission to bring all nations together in friendly competition. However, preparations continue apace for the Eurovision Song Contest in the host city Kyiv. Our top priority remains to produce a spectacular Eurovision Song Contest with our Member UA:PBC in May.”

What do you think about this latest development with Russia’s participation? Shout out your thoughts on the wiwibloggs app, or in the comments section below.

Chris Halpin

Chris has been a Eurovision fan since 1997, when he entertained his family with an all too enthusiastic commentary over Katrina and the Waves' victory. Today, he does much the same on the internet, including on his Twitter, @KatsJonouchi. Keep up with the latest Eurovision news and gossip by liking our Facebook page and by following the team on Twitter @wiwibloggs.

222 Comments

Let’s be honest here. Eurovision has always been marred by controversy but I think this controversy is going to come with some very nasty consequences, particularly for Ukraine.

Yes, Julia was deliberately chosen but were there any artists from Russia that were eligible to participate under Ukrainian law in the first place?

Secondly do you think this is over now that Russia has withdrawn? Do you not think that there isn’t going to be some punishment once the contest is over?

From what I am reading, the treatment of homosexuals in Ukraine is just as bad as Russia. Is this actually true?

This is in no way defending Russia. I am aware of the atrocities they have committed and they are not innocent in all this. However this was a chance that Ukraine and Russia had to broker a deal. A set of extremely strict rules could have been enforced. But no, Eurovision has become so political it has crippled countries from participating to the point that the revenue is also affected. This is just a shame.

Ariso LightApril 15, 2017 @ 5:10 am

Ukraine thinks they’re a better country than Russia, but they’re just as bad. I hope Russia wins the contest next year so Ukraine can leave. Ukraine says “Russia’s aim was to bring a negative atmosphere” Well Ukraine brought a negative atmosphere first by banning Russia’s singer!

Vytautas Landsbergis JuniorApril 15, 2017 @ 2:37 am

So, my comment was not approved, because I called Russia a fascist country. But most of political scientists can easily argue that it is. Is the moderator Russian?

Orla hardyApril 14, 2017 @ 10:55 pm

Well done Ukraine !!!
Russia and diversity?
How many votes did they give Austria when conchita won? 0
There’s russias view on diversity
They sent a song and singer for political reasons – it’s time for Russia to EXIT for good

JosephMay 20, 2017 @ 1:36 am

Why? they are an european country they have that right

BravoApril 14, 2017 @ 6:26 pm

Excellent news. The song was terrible and one less Eastern European country giving points to their friends and neighbors.

EuropeanApril 14, 2017 @ 2:40 pm

Best news ever! Russia should never return!

ZebbApril 14, 2017 @ 2:36 pm

It was a road full of loss for each involved side but in EBU’s eyes Ukraine is still escaping responsibility. So we might see more news on this hackneyed theme.
Another thing I’m wondering – will stream channels be blocked for russians during contest?

AngiePApril 14, 2017 @ 1:03 pm

To be honest I expected that, as no one takes a step back! If they wanted to find a solution they would have found it! Now, it’s too late!

In my opinion, Russia should have sent another artist from the beginning, in order to avoid conflict, or simply withdraw.
They knew that many Russian artists are banned from Ukraine, so they could find another one to send at Eurovision and it would be ok. Instead, they chose to send Julia, aware of the consequences. That’s how we ended up there.
Sad for Julia! Hope she comes back with a better song some time! I’d love to watch her sing at Eurovision!

The last thing I want to add is that Russia and Ukraine can take a lesson from this situation. They should leave their political issues out of the contest and be willing to cooperate in such cases.

JosephMay 20, 2017 @ 1:35 am

Leaving on a side if this law was already existant, why did they even let her get announced on the first place, also probably a 95% or Russian singers have sang one time or another in Crimea, its almost impssible to find an artist good enough for Eurovision that hasnt sang on Crimea

PPApril 14, 2017 @ 12:20 pm

fikri

Russia don t broke qualification streak because they withdraw this year before contest. Same as Romania they withdraw last year

JustitiaApril 14, 2017 @ 11:15 am

Political / economic interest and hypocrasy, as usual. Discrimination against Russia is not fair, because every participating country has skeletons in their closet.
What about the apartheid and genocidal Israel?
BOYCOTT EUROVISION!!!!

fikriApril 14, 2017 @ 10:59 am

what upsets me the most is with this, russia has broken its final qualification streak. it’s not their fault too!

all hope lies on azerbaijan to continue the legacy…

AberSamApril 14, 2017 @ 10:16 am

@Just me and Allan

Serbia and Kosovo actually have mediocre relations between each other. That’s mainly because both want to be EU members and the EU is making them play nice. So if Kosovo won I would say that there might not be any problems with them hosting, regarding borders that is. Also it’s important to note that Kosovo and Serbia are not in a quasi-war with each other at the moment either.

KrzysztofApril 14, 2017 @ 9:49 am

I wonder why some people commenting want EBU sanction Ukraine’s broadcaster. Shouldn’t the Russian broadcaster be sanctioned instead for playing dirty? For me it looks quite clear they just wanted some pretext to not participate (in the ESC held in Ukraine) and they decided to play a victim.

I won’t blame any participants or their songs for this situation, like others. It is not their fault. I’ll blame other televoters for not voting Dami Im as much as I did.

Anyway, I’m so happy I’ll be in Australia at that time instead, of course because of Dami Im (who should have won – she was the best!!!) and her clever plan to make her tour’s finale on the Eurovision weekend. 😛

Just MeApril 14, 2017 @ 9:49 am

You have 14 countries which dont recognize Kosovo (Spain, Greece, Cyprus, Romania, Moldova, Serbia, Bosnia and Hertzegovina, Slovakia, Ukraine, Belraus, Russia, Georgia, Armenia and Azeribajan). Lets say that all these countries wont give points to Kosvo but Kosovo ends up winning. How will Ksovo host Eurovision? Because if you enter Kosovo through Albania, lets say, from the point of view of the Serbian governmnet you entred Serbia illegaly. Serbia – Kosovo drama bigger than Ukraine – Crimea – Russia drama.

peter dolanApril 14, 2017 @ 9:29 am

if i made the rules for eurovision i would give russia 2 options
1. send in another song
2. broadcast the competition

if refuse DO NOT COME BACK TO EUROVISION EVER
if russia doesnt get its way this is the result – this is what they do politically also- shut down..

JosephMay 20, 2017 @ 1:40 am

The problem apart if they chose a pollitical based participant, its that in a studie 95% singers of russia have sang in crimea, its impossible find a good enoug for eurovision participant in that, also if that law was in place, why they waited to say it, because they didnt put any objectons the moment the entrie was selected, if that law has alway been that way i would have thought they have a list of person who are banned

Eurodrama is everywhere
– Brexit and maybe Scotland exit from brexit
– Belgium with its regions
– Spain with its regions
Don’t blame Ukraine, if you want love and peace go to the Alma topic and write 200 comments about her english lyrics, but you don’t do that.

anonymous91April 14, 2017 @ 8:52 am

i’m happy with this, now at least Romania and Switzerland are performing before both breaks (slots 5 and 13)

and maybe with Russia withdrawing, there might be a opportunity for San Marino to qualify haha

AllanApril 14, 2017 @ 8:39 am

Now imagine this: Kosovo debuts next year, sends Era Istrefi, Dua Lipa or Rita Ora with a killer song, wins Eurovision and hosts the following year. What will Serbia do? I guess the Eurodrama will be even bigger than this year!

EUROFAN MEXICOApril 14, 2017 @ 8:04 am

I AM SO SAD READING TO MUCH BAD AND RACIST MENSAJES JULIA IS IN MY HEARTH AND SHE DONT DESERVE THIS CIRCUS, viva la vida

ESCaddictApril 14, 2017 @ 7:57 am

This is a terrible outcome for Eurovision. If anyone thinks it is over now & we can move on, is mistaken. The damage will take years to repair.

I am not usually quick to blame the EBU for ESC problems but this mess is their creation. The EBU never should have allowed such a blatantly political song to be entered by Ukraine. It got worse when those politically biased juries sank Russia’s entry at the same time. So many national juries gave Sergey zero points. While some people may say that is fair, I smell a rat and I am sure the Russians do too. If anyone thought there would not be consequences, they were deluding themselves. So now Russia will not be participating, the ESC family is incomplete & millions of viewers are lost. It is now a festering, smelly mess.

I do not agree that both sides are to blame. Ukraine chose “1944” & Ukraine are banning Julia. Russia have done nothing wrong. In fact, I am surprised Russia want to participate at all but it was good they were willing. What Ukraine need to understand is they don’t choose or filter another country’s act. No country would accept that. We can’t expect Russia to accept that.

On a postive note, Russia have indicated they will be back for ESC2018. Ukraine, on the other hand, should hang their head in shame & withdraw. If not, the EBU should ban them for spoiling ESC2017.

quentinApril 14, 2017 @ 7:54 am

I like drama and surprises, drama is provided by the host, and surprises hope to be the results that contradict the bookies.
Don’t blame Jamala or EBU for allowing her in 2016, Europe voted for her because Europe likes politics to be involved in ESC, don’t roll your eyes now, you like politics because you voted for it. Don’t pretend that you want ESC to be some calm paradise, because you like drama as hell.

NoPeakInglesApril 14, 2017 @ 7:40 am

Ukraine is a sovereign state. Why should the interests of a tv show or a deliberately trolling Russia weigh heavier than Ukraines right to maintain its laws?

Russia was in my top 3. I love that song. She sing better than many of the other singers. But even that i hate Rusdia and Ukraine. Dont let them be in ESC anymore.

Charli Cheer UpApril 14, 2017 @ 6:06 am

Song was terrible anyways. I’m actually disappointed in Russia for sending this kind of quality after doing so well in 2015-2016. If Julia is coming back next year then her song has to be better than Flame Is Boring..ehm..Burning

blondboybcApril 14, 2017 @ 5:54 am

Well, this is hardly surprising given the acrimony and infantile behaviour of both sides. Honestly, both need a time out next year so they can reflect upon their childish actions. Neither party is innocent. “It takes two to tango”, as we say in English. The EBU needs to take strong action to save face. But, will they do it? Unlikely. But, hey, surprise us! Both countries have seriously lost face. 0 points to both!

Vladimir P.April 14, 2017 @ 5:29 am

Ukrainian believes they won in the dispute, but they’re not even aware how badly this reflects on Ukraine. They really leave the impression of a country full of hatred and intolerance. They don’t deserve Eurovision.

-_-April 14, 2017 @ 5:08 am

I try to be neutral in this issue, but I’ve seen some issues from both parties. Both countries are being stubborn in this case: Ukraine won’t temporarily withdraw the travel ban just for this Eurovision’s occasion. At the other side, Russia won’t accept either of EBU’s proposals, something that is more way feasible. And did Russia do the research about history of their representative?

SteveApril 14, 2017 @ 4:41 am

I prefect null points for Ukraine this year.

CfApril 14, 2017 @ 4:31 am

OMG! Which country should Belarus give 12 points to?

Murray AApril 14, 2017 @ 3:17 am

Look I’m going to remain neutral in this
But all I can say is from now on if a country with (let’s face it) permanent conflict zones (Ukraine, Russia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Armenia – anyone else?) Wins they shouldn’t be allowed to host it in their country. The broadcaster can host it in a neutral country

Justin K.April 14, 2017 @ 3:08 am

[@Filip: (in response to my broadcast question) Yes, Romania, last year couldn’t broadcast, but now can participate.]

I didn’t really count Romania considering they had reached an agreement with the EBU over their debts *and* they were forced out. This withdrawal is technically voluntary (as was Georgia in 2009, but I’m wondering if their admittance to the political nature of their song was enough for the EBU to forgive their actions). OR I’m wondering if a country withdraws after the participation fees are paid that they’re allowed back in regardless of broadcast. I would think if a country has chosen an act, then they’d have to had paid most (if not all) of their participation fees.
—–
And although meant to heal Europe after a couple devastating World Wars, it’s inevitable that politics (whether at the State or citizen level) muddles in the Eurovision Song Contest, whether positively (e.g. the so-called ‘bloc voting’ with neighborly cooperation, international collaboration on or selection of entries) or negatively (e.g. … now). ESC is never going to be perfect and full of sunshine and rainbows (well, maybe rainbows) because it deals with so many different people, cultures, and histories, but it does a pretty good job at (pardon the 2015/2016 references) building bridges to help Europe (plus Australia, and residents of other non-participating countries with Eurofans) come together.

Up close (in the moment), yes, this looks pretty bad no matter how you look at it (from either country’s or the EBU’s perspective), especially considering the media circus around this issue. Even in the long run, this may remain one of the more controversial issues in recent history due solely to its sensitivity surrounding so many issues.

It’s just a matter of how these parties handle and address it when the 2018 season starts.

HBauApril 14, 2017 @ 2:49 am

Of course Jamala’s song was political. Doesn’t mean I adore it any less, or her. But it won in the context of the world we live in – the same context that puts Germany last despite not having the worst songs, the same context that means Azerbaijan and Armenia don’t swap points, the same context in which Malta gives the UK most of the ones it does get, the same context in which Greeks and Cypriots proudly tell everyone they’re giving each other 12 year after year.

Eurovision is political. Everything is political, and that’s just doubly true for anything international.

I really like ‘A Million Voices’ too, and it was political. I was a fan of ‘Rise Like a Pheonix’, too, and it was political. All those people who loved Statements this year think it wasn’t, you know, a political statement?

Eurovision is political, and it always has been, and it always will be. As long as it isn’t extremely super overt, there’s not much anyone can do to about it, and 1944 was, if not by much, within the realms of acceptability.

MarApril 14, 2017 @ 2:16 am

We all knew this was coming, sooner or later. The only losers here are the EBU, who come out looking like a bunch of incompetent people who can’t solve the problems they themselves helped cause and make empty threats that wouldn’t scare a child. Russia probably got what they wanted, to give Ukraine a headache and make them look bad in front of Europe. Ukraine have got their hosting experience soured significantly?, but they still pulled off a fantastic move of domestic politics by defying both the EBU and Russia and defending their national sovereignty (against a nonexistent threat). I think both countries lost and won in a way.
One thing is for sure, you can bet your arses off that neither Ukraine nor Russia will win again for at least a decade.

mangouApril 14, 2017 @ 1:59 am

I think people are mixing up the seriousness of laws written by a television company and those of a sovereign state.

StarlightApril 14, 2017 @ 1:40 am

Russia should withdraw from the Earth.

SpirKApril 14, 2017 @ 1:22 am

I’m seeing many people blaming Jamala on this one. Either you think Jamala’s song was political or not, the song can be judged as political on it’s structure. As long as Jamala didn’t clearly sing anything about the Crimean annexation or refer clearly to Russia (on the lyrics) I believe that it can’t be objectively judged as political. Furthermore, Jamala didn’t win by herself, Europe gave the win to Ukraine, the European public voted her second in the whole competition, it wasn’t like someone just decided that Jamala will be the winner. It wasn’t the public’s first choice, but it indeed was it’s second. I mean, most of the fans have been ok with Sweden winning in 2015 despite being the public’s third choice. This story of Russia’s 2017 participation wasn’t easy to follow but it’s not the first time a country won’t compete in the last minute.
I’ll be watching the contest this year, with or without Russia participating and I’ll be watching the contest in 2018 with or without Ukraine participating, as I watched Eurovision last year without Romania and in 2009 without Georgia. I’m a fan and I want to enjoy the music party and the show, even if someone is not allowed to enter the party on the last minute (rightfully or not rightfully).

DyGhApril 14, 2017 @ 12:49 am

@Robert a song can be written for ages, it just can’t be publically released. (https://eurovision.tv/about/rules see Criterea and Eligibility, Songs)
Jamala told a story about her history, nothing wrong with that.

fikriApril 14, 2017 @ 12:36 am

anyone knows how many viewers eurovision stand to lose from russia not broadcasting the show?

jjApril 14, 2017 @ 12:36 am

Does Russia get its money back it sent to Eurovision to compete in this contest?

JameyApril 14, 2017 @ 12:34 am

The EBU members are complete incompetent. They don’t care about corruption in the preselections like Spain this year, and they are unable to solve a problem like this. They think that by giving stupid alternative they’re doing their job. Well, no… they are not. This is way out of hand. ESC2017 is gonna go down as rubbish because of these people in charge. I feel sorry for the artists.

tylosApril 14, 2017 @ 12:17 am

I remember that rule too. It must have been dropped before 2010.
Georgia did not broadcast in 2009 over the Putin song being disqualified but they returned in 2010 – and same for Romania as per Filip.

@Justin K
“correct me if I’m wrong or misinformed, but I believe a criterion to participate in the ESC is to have broadcasted the previous year’s Contest. Should Russia choose to forgo the broadcast, this essentially also ‘disqualifies’ them from competing in 2018. Have there been recent exceptions to this rule?”

@filip
“Yes, Romania, last year couldn’t broadcast, but now can participate.”

IanApril 14, 2017 @ 12:07 am

It’s sad that it’s come to this, it defeats the purpose of the unity meant to be put on display by Eurovision…but EBU cannot overstep the laws of the representative country. At least Julia will be back in 2018.

Also, let’s not go into conspiracy theories about Russian planning, or leave stupid comments blaming Jamala of all people (seriously?). It is what it is, let’s move forward.

EmmaApril 14, 2017 @ 12:07 am

When I will be in Kiev, I absolutely will throw eggs at Jamala’s face! Shame on her! She tricked us, she broke the rules of competition…

RobertApril 13, 2017 @ 11:54 pm

I am very glad that after a while people finally realized that it was all Jamala’s fault. I knew I wasn’t the only one! And she claims to be innocent after the winning? The EBU made a big mistake because they give her a chance to sing “1944” at Eurovision stage. It was a political song. And only an idiot will think otherwise.

– Dear EBU, do you mind if I break one of your own rules? I want to perform my song “1944” at Eurovision stage! But there’s one little problem, my song is political. This song is about the deportation of the Crimean Tatars by Stalin. And actually I wrote my song in 2014, but now is 2016. I broke the second basic rule. Oops.
– Oh, Jamala! We’ll close our eyes to this! We don’t want the Russia’s victory and we will do everything for it does not happen. You should definitely come and sing you “not political” song!
– Thanks, EBU! Kisses!

Well, Jamala started this dirty game even in 2016. She violated two basic rules of the contest, but she did not suffer punishment for it. I feel so guilty about Russia. Jamala’s victory must be canceled. I want to hit her head by a prize crystal microphone and give the victory to Australian Dami Im. Ukraine should be disqualified from the competition for 20 years for breaking the rules.

PaulApril 13, 2017 @ 11:53 pm

Ukraines law was a rubbish law in the first place! Who creates a law that bans singers in the first place?? They knew exactly what they were doing. They gave Russia some bait. Russia took it. In doing so – Russia gave Ukraine bait (which they took) and the whole thing is politicising something that’s just supposed to b a nice bit of fun. I’m annoyed!! I love Eurovision! Have done for years and it just feels like it’s being abused

ToniApril 13, 2017 @ 11:51 pm

Move Eurovision to Berlin!!!

fikriApril 13, 2017 @ 11:50 pm

well i guess we won’t be seeing ukraine after 2017.

AdamApril 13, 2017 @ 11:48 pm

People are seriously complaining STILL about Jamala’s win A YEAR AGO? Oh my god…. the pettyness of it all. Get over it – it’s just a contest. There’s no way her win will be nullified a year later. It’s irrelevant, the EBU is 100% focused on 2017, not bringing up something from 2016. You people need to just face reality and move on already because seeing the same weak arguments used over and over again is so old.

HadaApril 13, 2017 @ 11:41 pm

@AndersP No country has been banned. A SINGER has been banned because she broke Ukrainian law (good or bad, that’s another discussion). The country has said they’ll let any Russian act that hasn’t broken their laws enter the country and compete no problem (as they should), and EBU was willing to bend their rules so Julia could participate. Russia DECIDED TO WITHDRAW instead of sending someone else or participating remotely with Julia.

And for those who say the EBU needs to make sure a host country will let everyone go and perform: That’s not just an Ukraine or Russia thing. No country can guarantee they’ll let everyone enter, because there is always the possibility that any country will send someone that broke their law and is barred from entering their country. That could happen in Ukraine or it could happen in San Marino, or Sweden.

DickeFixApril 13, 2017 @ 11:27 pm

This is so sad!???????? I am from Sweden but blame EU and Russia for having torn Ukraine apart like a bride between two suitors. The people in Ukraine and Russia are not against each other. It is the politicians that destroy everything. The politicians in EU, Russia and Ukraine are all to blame for this situation.

The immoral Ukrainan law that ban artists that have visited Crimea to give joy to the people there, can not be ethically justified. Nothing positive can come out from such a law. It is against human love and causes only hate and disjunion.

The Ukrainian goverment is also stupid. If they had let Julia participate, they would have won sympathy from the world for their hospitality as a host. Now they earn only the opposite!

Ban all politicians from intervening in ESC! Let it again be a contest that unites the world and preaches love and tolerance.

TomApril 13, 2017 @ 11:24 pm

Julia Samoylova
youtube.com/watch?v=10LQIrEiLx4

TomApril 13, 2017 @ 11:19 pm

Banned Ukraine 2018!

DarrenApril 13, 2017 @ 11:15 pm

Well, it wasn’t a complete mess that was allowed to escalate, but I think under the circumstances, Russia’s withdrawal wasn’t the only viable option. I hope the EBU has learned it’s lesson not to be meddling in political affairs. It’s always a shame to see any country drop out of ESC, but the door is always open for Russia to come back in future contests if they wished.
It will be interesting to see a more fair Eurovision though in 2017, who will Belarus and other Eastern Bloc states vote for? We also have 10 qualifiers for Semi 2, instead of 9. It will be great to see someone else Top 5, not simply because of who they are.
Personally, I won’t miss them, with the exception of 2009, I have detested all Russian entries, do their withdrawal leaves me indifferent. Eurovision will survive without them, maybe even thrive, and if they ever want to come back, then they should be allowed and welcomed to do so.

StanApril 13, 2017 @ 11:09 pm

If Russia wants to compete so badly, why don’t they just return crimea to Ukraine? That solves everything! Maybe even better: return it to the Crimean Tatars. Forgive them, Stalin was maybe just a wee bit better than the Nazis, but not that much. Time to repair the damages the past and build bridges!

JulieApril 13, 2017 @ 11:08 pm

@Sam

Not political, eh? *Ahem* Hey Poland, I have an idea for your next song. Given the recent attack of your consulate in Ukraine, your next entry could be titled “Volhynia”. Just call it historical, even though everyone knows it’ll be a statement against the current events of modern Ukraine, and you’re good to go. I mean, after all, Jamala did show that this is a winning formula…

…..Does this hypothetical example not show you how Jamala’s song opened a can of worms, especially when there is so much contentious history in the nations of Europe? Do you not see how this defeats the very purpose of Eurovision? What we are seeing in Eurovision today is the consequence of allowing a political song like that into the contest. Repercussions will continue to come…

MartApril 13, 2017 @ 11:05 pm

Why do some many shout: BAN UKRAINE or that (for example) Italy shouldn’t patricipate as a portest???
For what? Because the Ukraine is sticking to their laws. The ESC is a guest in the Ukraine and if there is any problem, the guest has to accept what the host says…this are simply the rules of democracy

AlexanderApril 13, 2017 @ 10:43 pm

@Sam
“For the last time, Jamala’s song was categorically NOT AT ALL political.”

For the last time: many ukrainian officials and representatives, like Ruslana, as well as Jamala herself confirmed the political agenda of the song. In her interview with The Guardian, Jamala said that her sing was referring to 2014, too.

EscitaApril 13, 2017 @ 10:35 pm

This is totally ridicoulous…Italy should withdraw from this competition

MobounceApril 13, 2017 @ 10:34 pm

I am anxious as duck!
People are you aware of it?
Oxana still didn’t comment and i have a sense she is on her way!
She is on her way more than Omar Naber is.
And this wait is scary as puck.

FatimaApril 13, 2017 @ 10:30 pm

Calm down everyone, we could see this moment coming as soon as Russia invaded Ukraine. It would have been naive to think this would not be reflected in Ukraine’s subsequent entry, and that the song might gather support from those with anti-Russian sentiments. Did people really think that Russia would compete in Kiev without any fuss?

AndersPApril 13, 2017 @ 10:25 pm

I think this is sad. It could and should have been an opportunity to attempt to build creative bridges. At its fundamental core, Eurovision is a light entertainment TV show, nothing more. In all the years of the contest, a country has never been banned for such outwardly political reasons. I agree that Russia chose their artist to provoke this exact response from Ukraine. I also agree with the notion that 1944 was allowed to compete when it should have been banned, and that by playing with fire the EBU and the contest has got burnt. Surely Ukraine will now be banned for a significant number of years. This is a real black mark on this year’s contest. Celebrate diversity? What a shambles!

SamApril 13, 2017 @ 10:25 pm

For the last time, Jamala’s song was categorically NOT AT ALL political. It referenced history and personal history at that and it was miles better than Sergei’s or Dami’s. Russia were just butt hurt like they were when Conchita won.
If you’re complaining about 1944 being a political statement then where were you when Russia sent ‘peace’ songs in 2014 and 2015, huh?
If you really want to believe Ukraine has done wrong in sending 1944 and banning Yulia then, sorry, but Russia has been worse in taking advantage of a disabled woman for their own gains.

mocosuburbianApril 13, 2017 @ 10:23 pm

one more spot in the final for a better song 😉

DaStar? (@dastarsays)April 13, 2017 @ 10:19 pm

I find this a dark day for Eurovision.

Either you’re supporting Ukraine or Russia, this thing is blowing up the safe haven that Eurovision has always been for a moment free of politics and other turmoil.

Eurovision used to be a festival for all nations to come together disregards of the differencies some may have.

Eurovision used to be a place of diversity and cultural expression, but now it has become a place where music gets attached to political statements and emotions.

I know there are struggles across Europe, and some may point at some nation(s) being the cause of all of this dismay, but still I wonder where we are heading if we cannot even keep Eurovision free from political issues.

This year I will watch Eurovision with a stone in my stomach, hoping that we can keep our peaceful continent as peaceful as it used to be when we where born.

I hope that next year Eurovision will be free from these types of issues that do not belong to our contest, but rather to a political debate or a news item on our television.

Eurovision should be a vision for a united Europe, despite of our differencies, issues and anger some may have. Today, once again, steps where taken that will further undermine the unity of our dear beloved songcontest.

I am choosing not to choose sides, I find both Ukraine and Russia making mistakes that Eurovision should never have allowed. Anyway the choices are definite and here we are waiting for the contest to begin, because the “Show” must go on..

EscitaApril 13, 2017 @ 10:18 pm

Shame on Ukraine and its stupid goverment

ben005April 13, 2017 @ 10:07 pm

I feel sorry for Julia, but since Russia didn’t want to replace her with other singer or have Julia performing via satellite this outcome seems okay. Russia broke the low by sending Julia to Eurovision plus they knew very well where she previously performed.

Alex MApril 13, 2017 @ 9:49 pm

I really hope this will be the last thing I’ll hear about Russia in the context of Eurovision 2017.

Where I belongApril 13, 2017 @ 9:46 pm

It is a shame how the idea of getting Europe together is shattered. What is the ESC worth with this failure ?
I am deeply disappointed.

ZachApril 13, 2017 @ 9:43 pm

I am sad to see that Russia who has such a strong backing won’t just let this one go and have Julia compete next year when it is outside of Ukraine and just allow for a simple replacement singer this year. As long I said before no matter who you are disabled or not you should be respective of the all and that to be truely equal you need to face the consequences equally. I belive Julia is not at the fault of her being selected but must know that this was the eventual outcome and not be concerned with this sitution or be hostile to the Ukrainian government. Ukraine is not at fault for following through on their commitment to not allowing the normalization of a Russian controlled Crimea. As for individuals who are Ukrainian being bigitory to the the Russian delegate whomever it maybe is truly unacceptable and had Russia participated the Ukrainian government would make sure to protect them and not allow any harrasment or encourangement of such behaviors, as for the Russian people reacting to the win last year show they are also not to friendly towards the idea of having lost to Ukraine and deserving cannot be hostile for saying they should boycott and then be unable to participate. Shche ne vmerly Ukrayiny ni slava ni volya

OrangeVortyApril 13, 2017 @ 9:36 pm

“1944” was political. Russia has illegally annexed the Crimea. Russia knowingly selected their artist. Eurovision does not trump Ukrainian law regardless of ‘theme’. This disagreement overshadows the music. Hopefully we can start to move on before the real media interest begins.

DunjaApril 13, 2017 @ 9:34 pm

Clearly there is only one person to blame for all of this. And it’s Jamala. I guess I still don’t understand how the EBU allowed her to participate with a political song. Georgia was disqualified in 2009 due because of political song. Lebanon was disqualified in 2005 due to the fact that their national broadcaster refused to show Israeli performance. All countries that violated the the contest rules, in due time were punished. Jamala is a naughty person, and she must pay the penalty. But I want her victory to be canceled.

filipApril 13, 2017 @ 9:26 pm

@Justin K
”correct me if I’m wrong or misinformed, but I believe a criterion to participate in the ESC is to have broadcasted the previous year’s Contest. Should Russia choose to forgo the broadcast, this essentially also ‘disqualifies’ them from competing in 2018. Have there been recent exceptions to this rule?”

Yes, Romania, last year couldn’t broadcast, but now can participate.

Benji KhanzadehApril 13, 2017 @ 9:14 pm

The People to blame here is Ukraine. Yes she might have broken Ukrainian law but it is just inhumane to ban somebody from achieving their dream and she is also disabled! The theme is celebrate diversity right? So why have they done this? Ukraine should be punished and I cant imagine how Julia is feeling right now!

MattApril 13, 2017 @ 9:13 pm

Inb4 Jamala’s win really is nullified. ????
I really hope it is, because Ukraine has done its best to make it happen. Good job! ????????

PlumApril 13, 2017 @ 9:12 pm

Am I mad? I am definitely not. The article head has been changed.
It’s not that Russia won’t COMPETE. Russia won’t participate and broadcast.
Best wishes to EBU.

JimmiApril 13, 2017 @ 9:06 pm

And I agree. Ukraine should not have won last year. Even all must accept Ukrainian law, Ukraine should have been disqualified last year. EBU is responsible for all this mess, since they allowed Ukraine to break the rules, by taking part with a political song.

JimmiApril 13, 2017 @ 9:03 pm

Well done Ukraine. You did the absolutely right thing. ALL countries, including Russia, must accept Ukrainian law. Russia could send another singer, but they wouldn´t, and then they have to leave.
Russia is not more important than others.

brunowskiiApril 13, 2017 @ 8:57 pm

Simple… Russia and Ukraine should them both be banned next year…

SammyApril 13, 2017 @ 8:57 pm

I agree with Anna’s comments about “1944” song. Come on, guys. We always knew that Jamala’s song was political, isn’t it? She broke the law, and now it’s a pattern. Well, that was the last straw. Despite the fact that I am an American, I support Russia. When everybody uses the same rules, it all works. Political songs should not win at Eurovision. The EBU should annul Jamala’s victory because she broke the rules.

oliApril 13, 2017 @ 8:57 pm

Finally! NOW: Let’s the Eurovision song contest begin!!! 😀

Use of common senseApril 13, 2017 @ 8:51 pm

Internationally recognised , Crimea is Ukraine teritory, currently under Russian occupation.
Yulia entered Crimea without Ukraine visa, accept, therefore, she committed an offence to Ukraine state and she’s banned to enter the country. This is egat’s happening everywhere in this world when a person enter a country illegal. I don’t see what the problem is and why is this EBU and Eurovision problem.. and why is this issue over mediated. Thus is Russia and Ukraine problem and they should solve it between themselves. It has nothing to do with music and Eurovision..

KESCApril 13, 2017 @ 8:49 pm

Of course, this was all planned. You should all feel sorry for Yulia, but not for her country, which selected her with purpose, just to be the nice one, next to Ukraine. And did they win? Yes. So, nice played! The fact that it was all kind of propaganda, was already to be seen in Russia’s official music video.. Accidentally, the camera showed two women, from the audience, and their reactions, while listening to a poor woman, sitting in a wheelchair.
I have nothing against Russia, but this year, they’ve done everything wrong. They should have never confirmed their participation this year. Nevertheless, I can also say that I’m quite disappointed with Ukraine, not being able to put politics two weeks aside. Such a shame!
But, as polegend said, I’m already happy to see Yulia participating in 2018, if Russia really selects her. 😉
Now, if Tamara wins, I want to see all our reactions. 😀 😀 I know it’s not gonna happen, but would be quite weird.

EveApril 13, 2017 @ 8:49 pm

What do I think? As if anyone care what do we think, ask politicians.

MarkApril 13, 2017 @ 8:48 pm

Russia did this on purpose

PaulApril 13, 2017 @ 8:44 pm

What do I think? I think EBU really SUCKS… they could have saved us all this mess by rejecting Ukraines lack of organization from the very beginning.

KatApril 13, 2017 @ 8:42 pm

If Russia don’t broadcast the contest this year then surely they won’t be allowed back next year? Or will the EBU continue to bend over backwards for Russia like they always do and let them participate?

Polegend GodgarinaApril 13, 2017 @ 8:41 pm

@ Ern – you’re right, it’s all EBU’s fault here, and that menacing lady whose name I don’t remember is only talking bs when saying Ukraine will face charges bc she’ll be gone from EBU in July.

AzaadApril 13, 2017 @ 8:40 pm

@Justin K

I think that just applies for countries wishing to make a debut at the next contest, not for countries with a history of participation.

AnnaApril 13, 2017 @ 8:39 pm

The lyrics and/or performance of the songs shall not bring the Shows, the ESC as such or the EBU into disrepute. No lyrics, speeches, gestures of a political or similar nature shall be permitted during the ESC. No swearing or other unacceptable language shall be allowed in the lyrics or in the performances of the songs. No messages promoting any organization, institution, political cause or other, company, brand, products or services shall be allowed in the Shows and within any official ESC premises (i.e. at the venue, during the Opening Ceremony, the Eurovision village, the Press Centre, etc.). A breach of this rule may result in disqualification.

So, Ukraine, are you still in Eurovision? Jamala violated the most important rule of Eurovision! Jamala should be banned and her victory must be annulled. The rules should be the same for everyone! I HATE JAMALA!

AzaadApril 13, 2017 @ 8:38 pm

You can’t divorce politics from a song contest between nations when nations give each other points. The Ukrainian broadcaster cannot break Ukrainian law, and Ukrainian law made it clear that Yulia can’t enter the country. We can debate the merits of such a law, but we can’t deny its present existence and make exceptions for ESC.

Honestly I’m just glad Russia won’t go to the final with a mediocre song and a more deserving song will make it through. Although I do hope channel 1 is keeping its promise and letting Yulia compete in 2018. If they do, we can’t accuse them of using her as a pawn.

Justin K.April 13, 2017 @ 8:37 pm

We can’t say we didn’t expect this because this was entirely a possibility the second Ukraine won last year in Stockholm. I’m just surprised the ‘drama’ of the matter dragged out for this long, with rehearsals coming up quickly.

I don’t think it’s fair for the EBU to really admonish Ukraine as they have their own national laws—if the EBU were a governing body, then maybe it’d be a different story, but just as a network of national broadcasters? ‘Strongly suggest’ is probably the greatest amount of effort they can do, but to ‘force’ Ukraine to put its laws on hold would have been too much, even for the EBU. At the same time the exclusion of Julia, a great representation of this year’s theme, is rather regrettable. This could have been a decent chance for the two countries to improve their relations (even just if on the surface without much substance), but it’s only a pipe dream now.

However, I don’t think we can fully remove Russia’s probable intentions in selecting Julia. She definitely had the agency to agree and record a song (and live performance), but with the high amount of detail Russia usually pays attention to in regards to their acts (esp. since about 2012), it’s very difficult to say this outcome wasn’t intentional. Throughout history Russia (or at least the leadership attributed to the territory/area of Russia) had been excellent at propaganda, and with the weird political times we’re living in now, it wouldn’t be surprising if this was the intention of Channel One and the Russian Delegation from the start. There’s a level of ‘transferable sympathy’ that Russia could be aiming for with the selection of Julia; I sympathize with her inability to perform, but I can’t say I feel the same about the situation as a whole.

Coming out of this situation, the bigger issue is their decision to not broadcast the Contest: correct me if I’m wrong or misinformed, but I believe a criterion to participate in the ESC is to have broadcasted the previous year’s Contest. Should Russia choose to forgo the broadcast, this essentially also ‘disqualifies’ them from competing in 2018. Have there been recent exceptions to this rule?

EmanAEApril 13, 2017 @ 8:34 pm

This is just a sad situation. I feel patriotism/discrimination is skewing SOME people’s view on this as well because BOTH the Ukrainian and Russian governments are at fault here. Ukraine could’ve easily allowed Yulia to enter the country for two weeks in goodwill considering she’s no political threat but Russia is at fault as well for being uncompromising and by the looks of it, intentionally trying to make Ukraine look bad by selecting Yulia knowing that it would cause trouble. Both should be banned for a while so that they are made an example of and I can only feel sorry for Yulia in all this. Now let’s just focus on the music and put this political drama behind us!

Esc PhanieApril 13, 2017 @ 8:33 pm

OMG is it possible that all of you let Russia cheat you?? They knew the outcome of all this disaster since the very begining and they have played with everybody to be a martyr. Even the choice of Julia is very well planned. It is shameful from Russia¡¡

ErnApril 13, 2017 @ 8:26 pm

@Denis — are you nuts??

A lot of people will miss Russia. They do well at Eurovision, so they obviously have a lot of fans throughout Europe.

@Tusan — “Eurovision is not above the law.”

True, but this law is a bad one.

Note that Ukraine (and Russia) have anti-gay laws. Should we go tell gay people entering Ukraine for the contest that they need to stay closeted for the duration of the contest?? After all, according to you all people (including gay people) are NOT above the law.

CatherineApril 13, 2017 @ 8:25 pm

Disgusting. Shame on Ukraine! Shame on Ukraine! Shame on Ukraine! And of course they must have punishment for it!

DominicApril 13, 2017 @ 8:24 pm

Why are so many people still bringing up the tired argument about Jamala’s song being political? It’s been done to death. I could write a song about getting up in the morning and brushing my teeth and you could draw a parallel to some Russian act of aggression. Perhaps Russia needs to examine why that is!

@RNRS Trust me, no one will give two sh.ts about it next year.
@Polegend Eurovision is not above the law.

God-EmperorApril 13, 2017 @ 8:18 pm

This just hit the rock bottom. My heart is with russians which are being constantely vilified by the disgusting propaganda of zionists. LGBT and feminists scum that went crazy with the freak from Austria also contributed to this. Well done. Now, where are the service activists to protest against this shameful episode? Hypocrites!

GO JULIA, GO RUSSIA!!

Polegend GodgarinaApril 13, 2017 @ 8:13 pm

Wow, well, I still think Ukraine should’ve done an exception as Yulia represents no harm for their security. I’m very disappointed, I still hope Russia maintains voting rights like Serbia & Montenegro in 2006.

DenisApril 13, 2017 @ 8:13 pm

Anyone surprised? No? Anyone will miss Russia? Nah…
I can’t believe you all fell for Russia’s trick, I thought you were brighter than that! This is exactly what Russia knew would happen, they played Ukraine and used Julia like a pawn! Using a disabled girl for your own political purposes is beyond low, but that’s Russia for you! No moral what so ever!

RNRSApril 13, 2017 @ 8:11 pm

@Sandro. Neither Ukrainian or Russian

Dude, read the article. EBU have offered a performance via satellite…

YoungsterJoeyApril 13, 2017 @ 8:08 pm

What if Russia maintains voting rights like Serbia did in (I think) 2006? This is slightly bad news for the former Soviet bloc who normally gets Russian points (Azerbaijan, Belarus, Lithuania, Armenia, Georgia, Estonia, etc.).

RNRSApril 13, 2017 @ 8:08 pm

Those who think Russia lost, think again.
First of all they don’t have to spend any money on production this year, yet they are still talked about. Second; Ukraine now looks very bad indeed and will probably face a punishment from EBU. And third; next year they already have an artist that has gone through a lot of trouble to have her dream come true about performing at Eurovision and people will remember that. Maybe even four; if Ukraine now comes out with a list of banned flags within the next few days/weeks and bans Russian flag. I feel like it would be the last nail in the coffin for Ukraine.

Sandro. Neither Ukrainian or RussianApril 13, 2017 @ 8:07 pm

Can some of you angry or happy people not perhaps allow this lady sing on neutral territory. Have it televised and somehow via satellite and have it voted for all the same ?

WasxeApril 13, 2017 @ 8:01 pm

Poor EBU. 140mln audience is 1/6 or 1/7 of the revenue from televoting, right?

SerbianApril 13, 2017 @ 7:58 pm

Doing with Ukraine the same what was with Lebanon in 2005? Such a great idea! Love it!

SvetoslavApril 13, 2017 @ 7:56 pm

I am on the site to Russia in this … I am sorry but i think Ukraine is severely violating The whole idea of ?urovision … It does them no honor… The fact that they won last year with a highly political anti Russian song only makes Ukraine more guilty. In the destruction of eurovision if not in the whole situation they find himself in…

#JusticeForJuliaApril 13, 2017 @ 7:55 pm

All my support and love to Julia <3

CookyMonztaApril 13, 2017 @ 7:51 pm

@AberSam: Hear-hear!

Chicken kyiv???April 13, 2017 @ 7:43 pm

Ukraine will be banned for 2018, 2019 and 2020.

See you in 2021 Ukraine! Hasta La Vista!

Anna MilesApril 13, 2017 @ 7:42 pm

They tried to play unfair. They won’t be missed

XephApril 13, 2017 @ 7:38 pm

Nothing of value lost there.

AleksiApril 13, 2017 @ 7:38 pm

Obviously Ukraine gets 3 year ban after this contest and russian is back in next year.

razmeqApril 13, 2017 @ 7:37 pm

I am happy for armenia vote for us peopell!!!

Chicken kyiv???April 13, 2017 @ 7:37 pm

@Azaad

I think it would be very hard for anyone even the Russians to blame NTU, primarily because NTU doesn’t exist anymore 😛

CookyMonztaApril 13, 2017 @ 7:35 pm

@Nice: That won’t happen. Even Ukraine knows O.Torvald’s rock song is not strong enough for them to win again. Now, if the odds had looked WAY better for them, we might have seen the Ukrainian organizers and security in long, overnight conferences over whether to waive the ban on Yuliya or not.

Be that as it may, while everyone has been playing chess, Ukraine has been playing poker. Has anyone else actually announced that they were walking out, as per Deltenre’s bluff?

PlumApril 13, 2017 @ 7:34 pm

I am deeply and sincerely sorry for Sergey who was artificially deprived victory in 2016 in order to prevent Russia from hosting, for Julia who won’t fulfil her dream to participate in Eurovision this year and for Jamala who became the most scandalous, political and contraversial winner ever.
I am proud of Russia standing firmly on its position and I am happy that I shan’t watch ESC this year though I’d been watching it for more that 30 years before in a row. I am shocked with Ukranian misplaced obstinacy and political stupidity.
Shame for EBU for having allowed and approved the situation a year ago.

Billy LoomisApril 13, 2017 @ 7:33 pm

It will be a much better contest without Russia.

janet kenchApril 13, 2017 @ 7:29 pm

my message to both Countries equally – GROW UP!!!

CookyMonztaApril 13, 2017 @ 7:25 pm

If the EBU were smart, next meeting they hold they should install a new clause, which reads that countries at war with one another or with themselves (i.e., civil war) cannot participate or host until hostilities are over.

As far as this is concerned, this is not much of a surprise here. Ukraine was flat-out prepared to stay home if Sergey had won last year…

But unfortunately, I guess that now it will leave you some free time to continue playing it dirty in Syria too…poor guys!
)-:

AberSamApril 13, 2017 @ 7:18 pm

1) The EBU released a statement ages ago saying that they would not take any action until after the contest was over.
2) Can we all already stop debating whether Jamala’s song was political or not already. We all know that it’s only brought up to delegitimise her win.
3) Have you seen the state of Eurofans during this? If the Ukrainian Authorities are bad for ruining the theme of celebrating diversity then we’ve ruined it too. Look at all the hateful comments against Ukraine, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan all of the countries. Maybe we should start trying to see both sides of the argument and stop criticising each other or stooping to accusing every nation we don’t like of being a homophobic country, or saying that losing Russia is good because it’s a rubbish song. Let’s go back to actually being nice and respecting each other again.

SteveApril 13, 2017 @ 7:16 pm

Russia terrorises all its neighbours and both Armenia and Azerbaijan are not an exception. We should wait for a waive of pressure by Russia to force other countries to withdraw.

AlexanderApril 13, 2017 @ 7:05 pm

@KESC
“Her song was not political, as she was allowed to perform it”

You’re absolutely right. After the Crimea annexation and in the light of the civil war between Ukraine’s gvnt and pro-Russian separatists, Ukraine skips one year and returns with a song about Soviet persecution of Crimean Tatars. That’s not political whatsoever. And the fact that a lot of Ukrainian representatives, like Ruslana, as well as Jamala herself (in the interview to The Guardian in 2016) confirmed its political message doesn’t make this song political either.

DominicApril 13, 2017 @ 7:05 pm

Russia clearly only picked the poor girl because they knew Ukraine would bar her. It’s inconceivable that they didn’t know she had performed in Crimea. By the way, did anyone else laugh their backside off at Russia accusing someone else of “politicising” the contest? Good riddance!

HadaApril 13, 2017 @ 7:04 pm

This is GREAT news for Bulgaria.

NikosApril 13, 2017 @ 7:00 pm

I kind of expected this result. This is going to make SF 2 interesting now with a spot freed up. Russia’s absence will hurt Belarus, maybe Israel, FYROM, and Serbia? On the other hand, I think the Russian diaspora will get behind Bulgaria which may see his odds shorten to near Italy territory.

azaadApril 13, 2017 @ 6:59 pm

I’m glad that the EBU has blamed the authorities and not NTU, the broadcaster did not ban Yulia and so should not be banned in 2018. Wonder whom Belarus will give their 24 points to now?

dadeApril 13, 2017 @ 6:57 pm

Both Russia and Ukraine should be banned for 3 years. So they figure it out without bothering a Song Contest. This is going too far imo. The Russian broadcaster should have known about that law and the ukrainian side knew they would look stupid by insisting on it. Finally they carry the Annexation of the Krim to the ESC. “1944” is why this is happening – still…. oh dear

KESCApril 13, 2017 @ 6:57 pm

LOL, some of you are really funny. Why the hell did you start hating on Jamala now?! Why should she banned now? She won last year, and now she will return as an interval act. If she should be banned, it should have been done in 2016 and not in 2017 😉
What’s the hate on o woman, who wanted to tell her grandma’s story, to the Eurovision community? If you consider her song as political content, you should not hate on her, but on the people voting for her, or the EBU.
Her song was not political, as she was allowed to perform it, so please stop all those hates on her.
Of course, she will be present, and will give the trophy to the new Eurovision king/queen, or should Ruslana adopt this job?! :/

The EBU won’t issue a sanction to Ukraine until the contest is over. Ukraine owns the EBU’s balls at the minute.

LuzApril 13, 2017 @ 6:48 pm

Good riddance Russia! I certainly won’t miss you and your dirty tricks. Don’t let the door hit you too hard on your way out…

GeorgeApril 13, 2017 @ 6:42 pm

I want the situation with Lebanon to repeat itself. But with Ukraine. The rules should be the same for everyone.

NiceApril 13, 2017 @ 6:38 pm

Let’s all vote for Ukraine this year to keep Russia away for one more year (giggling)

EmilyApril 13, 2017 @ 6:37 pm

This year we don’t celebrate diversity. Why does nobody say that Jamala’s song was political? I’m sick of talking about this actually. I want Jamala to be banned at Eurovision. And her political song too. And the European Broadcasting Union should disqualify Ukraine as in 2005 Lebanon was disqualified.

EvgeniyApril 13, 2017 @ 6:30 pm

I’m from Belarus and now I’ll tell my truth. Since Jamala won Eurovision last year Ukrainian media earlier wrote in 2016 that no one from Russia will be able to perform in Kiev. You can find these articles on the Internet. I’m going to talk about a different aspect of all this drama. Russia is always discriminated against at Eurovision. Remember last year when the professional jury gave 0 points to Sergey Lazarev. I don’t think that it was a coincidence, no. Sergey won the televoting. It was a hard slap to the professional juries actually. Everyone knows why Polina Gagarina didn’t win Eurovision in 2015. Because the politics.Yes, we all know that Are you saying that Måns Zelmerlöw’s song was more winning? Pff. A Million Voices was moooore better than this ordinary and without any big message song. Russia did the right thing. They will return next year and win. The Russia’s victory it’s only a matter of time. That’s a fact that can’t be denied.

Chicken kyiv???April 13, 2017 @ 6:30 pm

Anyone want to bet the spineless EBU waits until May 14th to act 😀 😛

Wouldn’t want Ukraine sabotaging the contest would we. So the EBU will want to puff out its chest and act against Ukraine, but will wait til after the Contest is over 😀

Aaron GRApril 13, 2017 @ 6:28 pm

And regarding ratings, anybody who wants to watch it in Russia will watch it – just like we do in the US or anywhere else that doesn’t broadcast the show.

Tel Aviv 2018April 13, 2017 @ 6:25 pm

I am so happy, this is actually weird lol.

JulieApril 13, 2017 @ 6:24 pm

Ukraine had the chance to take the high road here, and they failed. Petty, petulant, immature, and corrupt if you take take into account how they “enforce” this “law”. After watching all of these live Eurovision events around the world, I can’t help but think about how we’ve been deprived of hearing Yulia perform her song live 🙁

The contest this year has been soured and tainted. Their slogan of “celebrate diversity” is now a mockery.

Don’t listen to all of the hate, Russia – you will be missed. I hope you come back in 2018 stronger than ever!

Aaron GRApril 13, 2017 @ 6:23 pm

It’ll be nice to have a deserving song from Semi 2, instead of that flaming pile of bear poo that Yulia was going to lob.

RNRSApril 13, 2017 @ 6:22 pm

Wait, someone’s missing! @Oxana, babe, where are you. I wanna hear your ‘insider’ information about this whole thing. You would know exactly what’s happening, because you, unlike all of us, watch and read the most precise news in the world.

RadomirApril 13, 2017 @ 6:21 pm

I am also happy with this decision. They should play fair and respect host country’s laws. Now other countries in second semifinal has more chances to qualify. This entry didn’t even deserve it, but it would still be in the final for sure. Goodbye Russia!

AlexanderApril 13, 2017 @ 6:20 pm

@bb
“EBU want to break your own law because Russia”

EBU broke their own rule when they allowed Ukraine participate in 2016 with a political song.

SiranushApril 13, 2017 @ 6:20 pm

I know it’s Ukrainian law, but I still think it’s terrible. Ukraine should be banned from participating for the next year or two as punishment

DenizNLApril 13, 2017 @ 6:20 pm

I was shocked when I heard it at the Dutch news. Well, it wasn’t unexpected but still. Millions of viewers decrease probably.

cars10April 13, 2017 @ 6:17 pm

Lasha tumbai!
Good.

bbApril 13, 2017 @ 6:16 pm

Bravo Ukraine, EBU want to break your own law because Russia. 24 points from Belarus without Russia go to Armenia. 24 points from Armenia go to Georgia.

ColzApril 13, 2017 @ 6:16 pm

Wonder if Russia will put any pressure on its neighbours to join them in withdrawing now?

cheesecakeApril 13, 2017 @ 6:16 pm

This decision is for the best.
Well played, Russia, well played.

Bella simApril 13, 2017 @ 6:12 pm

This reminds me of a high school drama where someone isn’t allowed to sit on the popular kids table lmao. Childish as hell

Music should be a priority in this contest but unfortunately it’s getting more and more political.

AlexanderApril 13, 2017 @ 6:11 pm

@Hannes
“they hate Konchita”

Russian televoters gave Conchita 8 points, which means they thought it was 3rd-best performance, overall Conchita got 6 points from Russia—pretty good results. Or, wait a minute, are you building your opinion based on what one single politician said? If you are, you must be a very bright person.

Roelof MeestersApril 13, 2017 @ 6:11 pm

This is plain awfullness. My favorite song this year won’t even participate. They MAY just send another singer, but that is very unlikely 🙁 Well, at least we will see Julia perform next year, hopefully with an even better song. I want to point out that it isn’t Ukraine fault for respecting the law, but it is their fault that they couldn’t make a two week exception.

Sad, very sad.

KESCApril 13, 2017 @ 6:10 pm

The one thing, I’m happy about, is the fact that one spot for the final got free now. I mean even Claudia, or Jacques could qualify now. We have to think positively. 😀

ArieApril 13, 2017 @ 6:10 pm

The best birthday present EVER! Thank you Channel One! :p

ColzApril 13, 2017 @ 6:08 pm

Russia can now hold their own Contest as they have threatened to do before.
The rest of us can get on quite happily without them.

HannesApril 13, 2017 @ 6:07 pm

Russia (as usually) likes to play dirty. Choosing the singer the last day possible, without voting and even the head of the delegation did not attend the meeting in Kiev. They did everything possible do not participate. While signing about love, peace, million voices, they hate Konchita, Jamala, Mans and all others. I’m happy if they won’t participate. Homophobic country deserves it.

Roxana MontoyaApril 13, 2017 @ 6:06 pm

That’s what happens when you play dirty games. You don’t get invitation to the party. Hopefully it was a good lesson.

AlexanderApril 13, 2017 @ 6:05 pm

@Jobye
“I don’t need a country that puts homosexuals to concentration-camps”

What an excellent example of people having an accurate idea of Russia thanks to Western media.

BastiApril 13, 2017 @ 6:05 pm

hallelujah!!! was about time!!!!

MaclarenApril 13, 2017 @ 6:05 pm

Ok, would expect Bulgaria to win Eurovision 2017 now. It had some decent chances even before but now Kris is also likely to pick up the ‘orphaned’ votes of the Russian diaspora spread across Europe.

KESCApril 13, 2017 @ 6:03 pm

I thought that in English and Ukrainian, it’s Kyiv, and in Russian Kiev. But, I’m not sure..

Leo MApril 13, 2017 @ 6:02 pm

Please Russia, just announce your withdrawal already and we can move on from this annoying saga It’s has gone on long enough

ErvinSassApril 13, 2017 @ 6:02 pm

OMGGG! I am so happy! The end of the drama!!! YAAAS

cesarApril 13, 2017 @ 6:00 pm

The song has a good message but is very forgetful…

Julia has been chosen by Russia as a pawn…they knew what they were doing. Making Ukraine look bad because they are banning a woman in a wheelchair…

Russia should withdraw from the competition and EBU should make SURE in the future to enforce the “no political songs” rule… because if they did Ukraine wouldn’t have won last year.

And hahaha at people suggesting Russia was thinking about their singer’s feelings when they rejected selecting another artist or performing by satellite… this is Russia we are talking about! Since when has this country ever done anything for the greater good or had integrity, let alone cared about the feelings of a disabled person! Look into the situation of disabled people in Russia! This was a clear propaganda move.

UmerKimApril 13, 2017 @ 5:55 pm

Need help packing? Beat it queen

JobyeApril 13, 2017 @ 5:54 pm

Finally. I don’t need a country that puts homosexuals to concentration-camps and allows men to slap their wives. Bye bye Russia – do us a favor and never come back.

SamApril 13, 2017 @ 5:52 pm

I can’t pretend I’m not happy! We get to say goodbye to a mediocre-at-best song which would have been guaranteed to qualify because it’s Russia and a much more deserving song and country can take its place in the final 🙂 I don’t feel sorry for Yulia, I’m sure she was well aware of what could happen and had it explained to her and was paid lots of money regardless.

Russia, you won’t be missed this year.

LianneApril 13, 2017 @ 5:52 pm

Chicken Kyiv

I agree that Jamala’s song shouldn’t have had a political message to it, which was quite obvious, actually, but you can’t say that her song isn’t a masterpiece. Second, I think Julia wasn’t in the list because the Ukrainian authorities didn’t think she was going to be a possible contestant, but when she was selected, the authorities I guess investigated her and it was revealed that she had performed in Crimea, thus getting banned from entering Ukraine. Seems all fair to me. Plus they had several options, whether to change the artist or let Julia perform via satellite. Both options ignored, so it’s not Ukraine’s fault at all.

HiroApril 13, 2017 @ 5:51 pm

Channel One is playing professional with all or nothing principle. Changing artist or broadcast via satelite would hurt the artist and that’s not fair for Julia.
Well see you in 2018 with a better song!
and I hope next year there are no silly withdraws after the song was selected like this or last year

HBauApril 13, 2017 @ 5:50 pm

When Julia was announced, I (and many others) predicted pretty much exactly this outcome. Russia gets to look offended, and make Ukraine look petty and discriminatory, and doesn’t have to compete and legitamise Ukraine’s win.

I hope they are penalised for late withdrawal, although it is certain that they won’t be. And while the Ukrainian governemtn have not been saints in this either, as a neutral observer there’s no doubt that this was an orchestrated propaganda move for domestic consumption within Russia and abroad.

Eurovision *is* political and always has been; some countries play it harder than others. Few play it nearly as well as Russia have in this situation though.

KESCApril 13, 2017 @ 5:50 pm

Btw, the interrogation marks in my comment were not put by me. I did not know that you can’t comment with symbols here, so sorry. Don’t let yourself confuse.. 🙂

But that doesn’t write a blank cheque for Ukraine to use Eurovision to retaliate. First they sent an inflammatory political song last year, then this year they banned the Russian artist after she was chosen (Russia agreed not to choose anyone already on the list) and they then banned another 140 on top of her. It’s so excessive it’s clear they just don’t want Russia to participate, and for that, they should be punished.

Guðrún KarlsdóttirApril 13, 2017 @ 5:47 pm

Somehow I am happy with it. ._.

HarutApril 13, 2017 @ 5:46 pm

Armenia lost 1 more 12 points from Russia

KESCApril 13, 2017 @ 5:46 pm

Now, all this Ukraine-Russia conflict is so annoying!! Thank you Russia, for making the Ukraine and the EBU looking bad. Congratulations! ????????
Thank you Ukraine, as well, that you weren’t able to let a girl, sitting on a wheelchair, sing in your country, just because of political and unnecessary reasons. I’m sure Russia won’t even come with Julia in 2018, since there is no trust on them.
Nevertheless, I feel so bad for Yulia.. She shouldn’t have got the hope of representing her own country, although the whole situation was quite obvious.
The funny fact is that since 2 years, we don’t succeed with 43 countries participating. Bye bye Russia, won’t miss you, but Yulia! ????

StefApril 13, 2017 @ 5:45 pm

Both should be banned from Eurovision, both are using ESC for their political games.Jus like Armenia and Azerbaijan always playing with fire about those issues.

LianneApril 13, 2017 @ 5:44 pm

Can’t believe some people are actually deffending Russia’s side. Ya’ll are so naive and dumb to think Ukraine is the one politicizing the contest, when in reality, Russia played a game by sending a disabled contestant to make Ukraine look bad for banning a disabled girl. BYEEE, “Mother” russia. 🙂

Karl BApril 13, 2017 @ 5:44 pm

Julia should never have been banned in the first place. Letting her compete is in no way damaging Ukrainian sovereignty. We didn’t see any ban placed on Armenian entries in 2012 so why should Ukraine try to get away with it this year. I understand that there was no blanket ban on Russian performers, however the extent of Ukraine’s banned list is very over the top. It’s such a shame to see this happening and I wish it wasn’t, but I sympathise with Channel One’s actions.

Fan of Polina Gagarina and Sergey LazarevApril 13, 2017 @ 5:41 pm

My Russia! I’m really proud of my country! We firmly believe that ours was the right decision at the right moment. But we’ll be back next year. And we already know who will represent Russia at the Eurovision Song Contest 2018. JULIA’S FIRE IS STILL BURNING! It is a pity that this year the competition will lose 143.5 million viewers in Russia. A very large number of people! A MILLION VOICES FOR RUSSIA! Yeaaaaaaaah!

adrianaApril 13, 2017 @ 5:41 pm

Russia has today formally withdrawn from the 62nd edition of the Eurovision Song Contest in Kyiv, Ukraine.

ESC84April 13, 2017 @ 5:39 pm

WORST Eurovision ever

ErnApril 13, 2017 @ 5:39 pm

This was 100% political.

ANY artist selected by Russia would be denied entry. Anyone who thinks otherwise is naive. The Ukrainian government would invent a reason to deny them.

Also, STOP the anti-Russian nonsense! Ukraine’s anti-gay laws are just as horrendous as those of Russia.

terrorjaapApril 13, 2017 @ 5:36 pm

This drama wouldn’t have taken place if the dreadful song from Jamala never won, they sent a politically driven entry and now they ban Russia, further politicising the contest. I can respect Ukraine’s point of view considering the Crimea issue, the EBU however should never accept that Eurovision takes place in a country at war.

azaadApril 13, 2017 @ 5:34 pm

And for all of you attacking the Ukrainian broadcaster, the government forced them to do this, so don’t punish the broadcaster. And they gave Yulia and Channel 1 more notice than the EBU did with Ovidiu and TVR. The situation isn’t ideal but the host broadcaster handled a difficult situation with relative grace. Banning them in 2018 is just wrong IMO.

Imagine if Sergey won and it was St Petersburg 2017. Would you complain if Slavko was banned?

BisApril 13, 2017 @ 5:33 pm

Good riddance 🙂

AlexApril 13, 2017 @ 5:30 pm

“Yulia Samoylova’s replacement with another artist, in our opinion, can not even be considered.” …because??? Note how they provide no justification.

It is a shame that Russia will not be participating because Channel One was either too incompetent, too lazy, or too stubborn to find a new artist.

AlexApril 13, 2017 @ 5:30 pm

Silly, childish behavior

azaadApril 13, 2017 @ 5:30 pm

Well I guess Russia is out then. 2017 will be the year of the West’s comeback then.

At least we have one participant down for 2018.

JoeApril 13, 2017 @ 5:29 pm

I’ve got enough of this…

AndrijashApril 13, 2017 @ 5:28 pm

Russia is not loosing anything with this. The EBU and Eurovision are loosing a lot: integrity, viewing figures, good image, common sense… I lost interest for this contest completely. It killed Eurovsion spirit, so I definitely won’t be watching it this year.

(J)ESC FanaticApril 13, 2017 @ 5:27 pm

You know something, I’m fed up with all the drama! Since Ukraine and Russia cannot get along for ONE week, the latter should have withdrawn in advance. Bye, Russia and see you next year!
Now I only care about poor Yulia. Please let her perform next year, she deserves it!

ToinousseApril 13, 2017 @ 5:25 pm

@Ern Every country who wins can organise, including Ukraine, and except for the Youlia Gate they are doing fine, the stage and overall design is great.

ErnApril 13, 2017 @ 5:23 pm

Oh that Russia, they know how to play dirty.

Massive drop in revenue and viewership for Eurovision. The central Asian countries won’t broadcast the contest either, and Russians living in Wester Europe won’t watch.

Letting Ukraine host this year was a horrendous mistake.

mad-professorApril 13, 2017 @ 5:22 pm

Finally! Now we can actually get on with the contest without Russia’s petty games.

Chicken kyiv???April 13, 2017 @ 5:20 pm

Ukraine has turned the 2017 contest into a circus! Never let this unprofessional country host the contest again.

Oh and by the way Ukraine, it maybe “Kyiv” in Ukrainian, but it’s Kiev! in English!

JAKApril 13, 2017 @ 5:20 pm

RUSSIA GO HOME TERORIZM COUNTRY

DanielApril 13, 2017 @ 5:19 pm

EXCELLENT! Russia tried to play dirty, but in the end Ukraine prevails.
No pity vote for Russia in 2017 – great!

Esc fan ukApril 13, 2017 @ 5:19 pm

So sad that Julia is being used as a pawn by the Russian state. Why would they pick her if they knew about the Crimea situation? To provoke Ukraine and make them look bad when they are only doing what there laws say.

azerakiApril 13, 2017 @ 5:17 pm

Banned Ukraine 2018!!!! Shame!

Esc stuffApril 13, 2017 @ 5:15 pm

Massive drop in rating for Eurovision and sponsors as a lot of people in Russia watch Eurovision not good for the event as a whole
Poor Julia

My Eurovision Scoreboard

Get wiwimail

About Us

All images on www.wiwibloggs.com are readly available on the internet and believed to be in public domain. Images posted are believed to be published according to the U.S Copyright Fair Use Act (title 17, U.S. Code.). Copyright ® 2009-2017 wiwibloggs.com. All text herein is property of the web site and may not be copied or reproduced without explicit permission.