Gone watching South Park. Linguistically it is very interesting. --Rockpilot 16:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

I've always been a great lover of South Park. Maybe not always, but it tends to be a highly intelligent bit of cartoonage. That is to say... certain episodes are immeasurably smarter than anything you'll see on CNN. Yeah. That's hot scissoring. Scissor me timbers. (That's not one of the episodes to which I refer. Nonetheless... amusing as all kinds of fuck.) — [RicLaurent] — 16:51, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

thanks so much. I had an awesome night last night. Totally made out with a zombie chick. --Rockpilot 13:27, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

I am glad you did, lol, I didn't had to work the medical tent at occupy sf but downed some malbec with a friend afterwards. Niiiice dude zombie chicks are usually hot, ugly skanks don't usually have the self esteem to go out looking dead. Geeze, I was shocked I got blocked for trying to be nice to some people that have helped me along and was trying to just be nice and spread the love. This place is weird.Acdcrocks 09:38, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

even better, she was Eastern European and I don't remember her name and didn't get her phone number. But in case she's reading Wiktionary, leave me a message honey. --Rockpilot 23:48, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

I'd like you more if you let acdcrocks edit more freely. I know he's a fag so obviously he's untrustworthy, but he makes some awesome entries (sure, most of the time the actually lexicographical value is low, but I like him a lot). And I thought the thing you blocked him for was actually quite funny. --Rockpilot 23:48, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

And I'm getting tired of being called a dude. —CodeCat 23:52, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

The thing is that I actually like him, too. My main problems with him are that he takes all criticism personally and he's a crybaby about it (honestly, what kind of person is going to even joke about a restraining order on fucking wiktionary, seriously?) and at the same time that he's whining about the way I treat him, he does stuff like the thing I blocked him for - which I also found amusing, but it does get irritating seeing the same whiny nonsense over and over. I enjoy some of the entries he adds, though the definitions are frequently... nothing short of horrid. But stuff like what I mentioned and the power bottom fiasco are just too much. You're certainly a troublemaker, but you're funny, and he's just sad. If I thought he would or could change, I'd be glad to only block him for a few hours or days at a time, but... I don't think he's the kind of person that can change like that. :( (I apologize for the block text, I'm bad for that) — [RicLaurent] — 23:57, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Playing the edit-conflicting game is fucking fun too --Rockpilot 00:02, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

My mom made it, don't blame me lol. Speaking of fake language skills, you remember a month or so back when you were a Pole and I asked you about that hummingbird shit lol, epic. — [RicLaurent] — 00:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

My bot could not create conjugated verb forms for quite a lot of the Portuguese verbs that you added to User:BuchmeierBot/FeedMe. This is because the entries lack a conjugation table and the bot can only create the forms based on the information provided by it. As soon as you add correct conjugation tables I will create the verb forms. Matthias Buchmeier 13:08, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Personally I'd translate this into the past historic, probably because I am actually a professional French-language erotica writer... anyway, in passé composé I'd go for "Il a souri quand j'ai mis la main entre ses cuisses et je me suis mis à frotter sa grosse bite". Meaning "he smiled when I put my hand put my hand between his legs, and (then) I started yanking his ding-a-ling". In French we usually don't say "ma main" for "my hand", but "la main" if it's clear that it is "ma main". And I'd use se mettre à for start, in this case. --Rockpilot 14:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Rockpilot; but to answer your specific question . . . the repeated je is optional, but the repeated avoir is less so: « et ai commencé ». —RuakhTALK 14:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I wish the past historic were used in informal French... every language needs a simple past form.

Truth told, French is actually one of my least favorite languages, but I understand it better than a lot of languages I've actually studied vigorously... it irritates the piss out of me. Anyway, thanks for your fine-tuning man men (damn edit conflict). I'm sure I'll be back with more, eventually lol — [RicLaurent] — 14:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

It is testimony to QPR's spirit then that it was they who next found the net as Bothroyd's goalbound header from an Armand Traore cross ultimately found the net courtesy of the back of Helguson, who was on the goalline but - despite the protestations of a number of City players - not offside.
Toure would have the decisive say though, rising high to power a header past Kenny from Aleksandar Kolarov's cross.

It looks a bit like sense 1.6 to me though. SemperBlotto 08:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

It's not impossible to read it that way, but I think that sounds odd in a news report – you would expect it to be italicised there if it were 1.6. Ƿidsiþ 08:51, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Cool, I guess Widsith's on the ball here. BTW, I really want to make a dumb joke now, involving wood, or maybe I would, but I can't think of a good one. Let's pretend I did, and if not let's not and say we did. --Rockpilot 22:55, 6 November 2011 (UTC)