Thursday, February 5, 2015

Editor’s Note: This story has not been
widely discussed. It came out right as the big Ebola scare was taking
off. Considering the debate over the MMR vaccine and the current measles
outbreak, and considering the White House just granted immunity to the CDC Whistleblower
to testify (although he’ll likely lie or wind up dead, that’s just how
things go in this corrupt country these days), this study is more than
relevant to revisit today.
While The Daily Beast, a left-leaning establishment-supporting outlet, raises a claim the study below is inaccurate here (and,
if you look even today, the place seems to love to sling around the
phrase “anti-vaxxer”), the actual article on TDB never even addresses
the study’s data itself or the conclusion, but instead employs a logical
fallacy strawman argument against said study authors (not seeming to
even research who they are specifically) and even the journal the study
is published in, never actually addressing the data itself or its
findings.

The bulk of the argument by TDB claims the study is correlation, not causation, but why
after studying the official government databases for 15 years of
vaccine records in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and
Denmark were they able to find a direct correlation systematically
throughout the entire data set that linked change points in autism
directly to the times at which vaccines developed with human fetal cell
tissue lines were introduced on a mass scale? That’s incredibly
troubling and obviously warrants further investigation.

Yes, correlation does not automatically automatically
equal causation, but that doesn’t mean it should be automatically
dismissed either. Far from it, this is a very compelling clue that
something is not right and further study is absolutely needed to make
sure there’s nothing here. Considering that none of the establishment
scientists are doing that study or even ever addressed these findings,
that’s very revealing. In fact, this is the first study ever to even
examine the question of a relationship between human fetal cell line
vaccines, specifically look at when they were manufactured, and the
insane rise in autism.

Read the study for yourself and
read the article below. The lead author is a PhD in Molecular and
Cellular Physiology from Stanford University, with 23 U.S. patents and
over 20 years in commercial biotechnology experience who has now chosen
to dedicate her career to speaking out against using human fetal cells
in products for health and safety reasons. Why should that automatically
discredit her or this data? Because she’s against Soylent Green?

Beyond that, who thought it was a good idea to shoot people up with
human fetal cells in the first place, anyway? Doesn’t it make sense that
could trigger switches? Furthermore, the issues of a vaccine being
regulated to have >10ng of DNA per dose and all doses analyzed having
between 142ng and 2,000ng seems more than slightly disconcerting
considering the vaccines in question — the MMR, hepatitis A, and the
chickenpox vaccines — are given to one-year-old childrensimultaneously in this country.

Autism And Cancer Related To Human Fetal DNA In Vaccines. Study
New Study In Journal Of Public Health | by Global Research

Seattle – A new study published in the September 2014 volume of the
Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology reveals a significant
correlation between autism disorder (AD) and MMR, Varicella (chickenpox)
and Hepatitis-A vaccines.

Using statistical analysis and data from the US Government, UK,
Denmark and Western Australia, scientists at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical
Institute (SCPI) found that increases in autistic disorder correspond
with the introduction of vaccines using human fetal cell lines and
retroviral contaminants.

Even more alarming, Dr Theresa Deisher, lead scientist and SCPI
founder noted that, “Not only are the human fetal contaminated vaccines
associated with autistic disorder throughout the world, but also with
epidemic childhood leukemia and lymphomas.”

Their study comes on the heels of recent breaking news that the CDC deliberately withheld evidence of the significant increase in autism among African-American boys who were vaccinated prior to 36 months of age.

So it should come as no surprise that the FDA has known for decades
about the dangers of insertional mutagenesis by using the human fetal
cell lines and yet, they chose to ignore it. Instead of conducting
safety studies they regulated the amount of human DNA that could be present in a vaccine to no greater than 10ng.

“There are a large number of publications about the presence of HERV
(human endogenous retrovirus – the only re-activatable endogenous
retrovirus) and its association with childhood lymphoma,” noted Dr
Deisher.

“The MMR II and chickenpox vaccines and indeed all vaccines
that were propagated or manufactured using the fetal cell line WI-38 are
contaminated with this retrovirus. And both parents and physicians have
a right to know this!”

Certainly these discoveries by SCPI should generate an immediate
investigation by FDA officials, if not an outright ban on the use of
aborted fetal cell lines as substrates for vaccine production. There are
numerous other non-human FDA-approved cell lines that can and should be
used.

Dr. Theresa Deisher is a PhD in Molecular and
Cellular Physiology from Stanford University with over 20 years in
commercial biotechnology, prior to founding AVM Biotechnology and Sound
Choice Pharmaceutical Institute. As an inventor of 23 issued US patents
she is world-renowned for her work in adult stem cell research and the
first to discover adult cardiac derived stem cells. Dr. Deisher was a
plaintiff in the US federal lawsuit to prohibit the use of taxpayer
dollars for embryo destructive research, which resulted in steering
science towards adult stem cell research and 14 US FDA approved adult
stem cell products.

Intellectual Center Reviews

Intellectual Center provides Independent News in blog format to assist other activists, teachers, and elders with alternative news, information on social issues, and research material.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Intellectual Center (Website) may post copyrighted material not specifically authorized in accordance with Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law allowing purposes associating learning processes. Please be advised if you intend to use such copyrighted material for personal reasons beyond "fair use," considerations, please obtain permission from the copyright owner. Learning processes encompass a vast array of issues of concern and would not be restrictive, it would offer critique and extended scholarly research.

Website may display third party authors/advertising which may not represent the views or opinions of Website or contributors. Advertisements are not endorsed as such and are intended as alternative ways to support the work at Website.