<jeanne> action: jeanne to respond to Oracle (Peter Wallach) to ask
what the points of conflict with 508 with ATAG, and that 508 cannot be
referenced in an international standard.

* @trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.

* RRSAgent records action 1

<@trackbot> Created ACTION-290 - Respond to Oracle (Peter Wallach) to
ask what the points of conflict with 508 with ATAG, and that 508 cannot be
referenced in an international standard. [on Jeanne Spellman - due
2010-09-23].

<jeanne> Group discussed the Oracle request for reference to 508 in
Part A. The group agreed that 508 is a national standard that is not
appropriate in an international standard.

<jeanne> SN and GP argued that we have to limit the number of
standards being referenced, because vendors will not try to meet all of them.
Vendors will meet 508 first, because that is market driven.

<jeanne> topic: WCAG Accessibility supported

<jeanne> group discussed how to make the qualification to WCAG more
clear

<jeanne> several alternatives were discussed. Propose to substitute
"meet" for "conform"

<jeanne> topic: Triage continues

<jeanne> topic: Email Client as an Authoring Tool

<jeanne> Discussion that tools may also do other things, such as
adding content that isn't web content.

<jeanne> In that case, the authoring tools do not apply as it is
outside the scope.

<jeanne> action: Jeanne to add Flex and Silverlight to the definition
examples of Web Content Technologies.

<jeanne> If there is an SC that goes beyond WCAG, we must show that it
is necesary for Authoring Tool accessibility. If not, we should harmonize with
WCAG 2

<jeanne> action: gp to write a proposal for a definition of
"additional information"

* @trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.

* RRSAgent records action 3

<@trackbot> Created ACTION-292 - Write a proposal for a definition of
"additional information" [on Greg Pisocky - due 2010-09-23].

<jeanne> topic: IBM comment 17

<jeanne> SN: How does someone determine the way the accessibility of
mashup information? When you exchange information you have to say how
accessibility is communicated?

<jeanne> JR: The pieces of the mashup are going to be in some piece of
technology where the original author may or may not have done. We say that you
only have to be responsible for information you can edit.

<jeanne> TB: It is an issue of how the authoring tool is going to use
it.

<jeanne> JR: Example - a PNG file has metadata. A HTML editor can take
the PNG and put it in the document and just identify that "blob" to the user.