What did you think of the site? E-mail haveago@dancingwiththegatekeepers.com

Saturday, 18 March 2017

YOU GOTTA MAKE WAY FOR THE HOMO SUPERIOR

We like to think we are “real,” or “authentic,” people, that
we know what a good life is, and how it should be lead. Effectively, we know what
a human being should be, but does that automatically mean we know what one is?
I would worry if we could not answer that question.

What we need is a human “holotype,” the term for a single
physical example of an organism, usually the one used when that organism was
described for the first time. Of course, there are many flies, butterflies and
bacteria for which we have the holotype – for dinosaurs, it will be a
particular fossil. The Natural History Museum is full of these, but they don’t
have one for the species looking at them.

Two “nominees” for the human holotype have previously appeared.
The 18th century Swedish botanist, zoologist and physicist Carl
Linnaeus, but because he devised the system of “binomial nomenclature,” using
Latin to delineate the genus and species of all living things, giving the title
to the creator of the name “Homo sapiens” was too obvious. Meanwhile, the 19th
century American anthropologist Edward Drinker Cope nominated himself, but upon
his death in 1897, his bones were found to be riddled with syphilis,
disqualifying himself altogether.

People like Racquel Welch, Bob Hope and Arnold
Schwarzenegger have also been thought of as a possible human holotype but, even
if there has never been an official position to fill, there could be said to be
a “situation vacant.”

For scientific purposes, we have intricate systems of
classification, with two further sets, genotypes and phenotypes, describing the
particular genetic makeup of a given organism, then the attributes and
properties that organism displays. It is extremely easy to apply these
classifications to other animals and plants because, even if it displays
consciousness, it won’t answer back, or become indignant, or violent, if you
put it into a group it doesn’t like.

This is the major indicator you have a human being on your
hands – they are conscious, they are self-aware, and they will let you know
when you are taking the piss out of them. We are the most social of animals, subject
to the rules and manners we personally live by, those we agree among ourselves,
and those we disagree with.

To choose one part of what makes a human, whether that be
sex, gender, hair colour, skin colour, body shape, intellect or experience, and
use it to evaluate whether one person is better than another, only leads to
accusations of misogyny, sexism, racism, and/or fascism, because not only do we
- from just between ourselves, to all of us - agree that’s what it is, we will
tell someone if they are one of those, or all of them, when they do it. When
even that doesn’t stop some people, it shows they are human too, no matter how
bad that is, but the ability to change, and the ability to hope for that
worthwhile change, is just as human too.