ASK IRA: Is LeBron or Riley calling Heat personnel shots?

Q: Ira, who's running the Heat, LeBron James or Pat Riley? LeBron has a high basketball IQ, but isn't it better to leave the basketball operation to Riley? -- Theo.

A: The Heat don't exactly have that choice at the moment, with LeBron clearly setting some ground rules for what he wants done. But the danger in resetting the team from LeBron's standpoint is that if he does re-sign, he likely still could return to free agency soon enough. And then the Heat could wind up like the Cavaliers, who eventually had a bunch of hand-picked LeBron choices and no LeBron, left wondering what to do with the likes of Antawn Jamison. The key is for Riley to finesse the situation to make LeBron feel like his suggestions carry weight. I think Pat Riley would be comfortable in telling LeBron that he tried for Carmelo Anthony but just couldn't make it happen. Just like when LeBron breaks the offense and runs his own play, sometimes Erik Spoelstra knows he has to smile and move on. So Riley likely will have to meet LeBron half way, allow LeBron to set the agenda, but then decide when to break off the play to the Heat's overall benefit.

Q: You've been talking for years about Samuel Dalembert commuting from his Boca home. If he's waived by the Knicks, could the Heat do it then? -- Baker.

A: Basically, a bunch of players with contracts that are only partially guaranteed or not guaranteed at all for next season will be part of trades either at the draft or during the early stages of free agency. Those are the type of bargains Riley could capitalize on, with John Salmons likely also to be in that group, as well. But I still would take a re-signed Chris Andersen over Dalembert. There is a reason Sam has bounced between so many teams.

Q: Ira, I like that the Heat worked out 40 players before the draft. That's almost as many as are in the entire draft. It tells me they plan to sign players who go undrafted. -- Wil.

A: Exactly. And if the players the Heat want aren't available when the Heat select, then it wouldn't surprising me if they dump their picks and load up with prospects for their summer camp that begins next week.

June 25, 2014

Q: In the spirit if overanalyzing all news, can we speculate that Ray Allen would not be leaning on returning unless LeBron James was going to stay? After all, they just went on vacation together. -- D.S.

A: At this time of year, you can speculate on anything, considering the free-agency signing period does not begin until July 1. But while Allen has made it clear that he wants to play alongside LeBron, that does not necessarily mean it has to be in Miami. The thing is, several of LeBron's Heat teammates, including James Jones, who also vacationed with LeBron last week, and even Chris Andersen, seemingly would prefer South Florida. So LeBron basically could have most of his band back, plus one or two prime additions, if Miami remains home. LeBron values locker-room cameraderie, especially what he has had these past four years. What Pat Riley has to convince LeBron (and therefore Ray, as well), is that there is a possibility for a more complete and well-rounded roster with the Heat. As I've writte, this is all about a series of dominoes that could fall into place, with Allen being one of them.

Q: Any chance of the Heat trading a first rounder for Iman Shumpert and still buying their way into the first round for some young talent? -- David.

A: Based on LeBron opting out, and therefore his desire for the Heat to work with cap space this offseason, not only don't I see the Heat trading for the locked-in salary of a veteran, but I could see Pat Riley either trading his pick or selecting a player who would spend 2014-15 overseas, in order to avoid being locked into a guaranteed salary for a first-round pick. An argument could be made that trading into the second round would make more sense, since those contracts are not guaranteed.

Q: This is one Heat fan that is chillin'. I fully expected LeBron to opt out. I expect Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh to do the same. I consider most of the stuff going on "white noise." When I hear final decisions made, I'll worry about it then. I believe LeBron will sign a two-year deal with an opt-out again after next season. Obviously, that's if he likes Pat Riley's game plan going forward. I believe that decision gives LeBron the most flexibility and options going forward, which I believe is his ultimate goal in this process. It gives him another year to see how it goes, how Wade's health holds up, and how the pieces Riley brings in work out. -- Bob.

A: So the sky isn't falling? (I've been locked inside my office, so I haven't been able to check.)

June 24, 2014

Q: My initial reaction to news that the Knicks were shopping Iman Shumpert for a late first-round pick was that it has Pat Riley written all over it! I got the following impressions from Riley's press conference the other day (among other things): 1. He's, as usual, not that committed to drafting a very young guy, but rather wants to replace old experience with younger experience. 2. And he wants Erik Spoelstra to get back to Heat basketball, gritty defense, etc. Shumpert is the quintessential Riley-type: He's cheap, and he's available for a draft pick (which Riley is historically loath to use). What are your thoughts? -- Mike.

A: That the Heat have to decide whether they want to maximize potential cap space during free agency, or find enough pieces to make one more run with LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh at high salaries. Considering LeBron has until June 30 for his early-termination option, he essentially would have to sign off on such a deal in advance. Shumpert is due $2.6 million next season, as his rookie-scale contract comes to a close. And there are ongoing health issues there. But, yes, I agree that there would be more instant gratification there than with the No. 26 draft pick. Plus, it would be interesting to see if you could stack Shumpert and Norris Cole on top of each other.

Q: When Riley talks to Carmelo Anthony and opens his bag of rings (now fuller by two) on the table, do you think that will work? Heck, may as well put the Heat's five conference champion trophies on the table, too. If Melo is serious about winning, I don't see how he would turn down the Heat. -- Terrence, Tampa Bay.

A: This has nothing to do with a Pat Riley pitch. This has everything to do with a LeBron James pitch. The only reason Anthony became a Heat possibility was because of the LeBron-Carmelo connection. Pat Riley likely would be informed after the fact whether it's happening.

A: Actually, Chris Bosh is the furthest thing from a diva, arguably one of the hardest-working players with the Heat. A diva would not allow a coaching staff and a system to totally reinvent his game. He is a team player willing to put aside his ego for the greater good. He is the absolute opposite of a diva.

June 23, 2014

Q: Is there any possibility that Carmelo Anthony could talk to LeBron James about taking a pay cut so he could join him in Miami? -- Jorden.

A: This is where the NBA's tamper-free zone falls apart, this period between now and the supposed July 1 start of the free-agency negotiating period. While Pat Riley can't text, email or call Carmelo, there is nothing to stop his players from actively recruiting. For that matter, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh are represented by the same agency as Carmelo, so it's not as if the respective agents can't hash out all the numbers. Not only "could" LeBron talk to Carmelo before James' June 30 early-termination deadline, he absolutely has to, for both his sake and the potential benefit to the Heat. With this much at stake, it would be practically irresponsible for LeBron, Wade and Bosh not to drop in unexpectedly on Carmelo. Team recruiting begins July 1. Player recruiting begins . . . now.

Q: Do you expect D-Wade to opt out? -- Brian.

A: Yes, to work out a deal that works for both him and the Heat . . . but only if he is sure that any money reworked will ease the burden on all of the Big Three. I believe the Heat's stars would give up money for the right player. I also believe they, and not Pat Riley, will decide who that player should be. I'm not sure they're giving up anything of consequence for Spencer Hawes and Marvin Williams, or anyone else of that tier.

Q: If Wade and Bosh don't opt out then trade their [adjective and bad word]. -- Tyler.

A: Which is why is makes sense for them to opt out, so they can control their own destinies. As free agents, they cannot be dealt. And if they re-sign, there would be an extended period before they could be traded. But you also don't blow up a team that has gone to four consecutive NBA Finals. That's where Riley's "get a grip" urging comes into play. There is an end game that can work for the Big Three, for Riley, and for the Heat. That's what these upcoming days and weeks are about.

June 22, 2014

Q: Ira, with all the talk about Dwyane Wade having to "reinvent" himself, what about Chris Bosh? If Wade cannot put up big numbers every night or be that "1A" option, I think it's time Bosh concentrated on getting back in the paint and scoring more. He certainly has the talent. -- Harold, Wellington.

A: First, the Heat and Wade have to decide next season's approach. Will Wade again miss a third of the schedule, once again either start or not play at all? Or can he gracefully move into a sixth-man role, where his routine absences would not have as much overall impact? Much of that, of course, is up to Dwyane, but a lot of it has to do with what replacement options become available on the free-agent market. Also, if Wade does slide into such a sixth-man role, then how would Ray Allen fit into the mix? Does Wade have enough quickness left to play as a reserve point guard (which, of course, the Heat also might already have in Norris Cole). It is a complex lineup puzzle that starts with Wade. Only then can the remainder of the pieces fall into place, including Bosh's role in the hierarchy.

Q: I'm still numb from the thumping I witnessed in the last three games of the Finals and have been reading articles on the debacle. Now that Pat Riley has told Erik Spoelstra to reinvent himself, will Spo have his "LeBron James/Mavs" renaissance summer? And if so, what changes do you think we'll see next season? (I'm hoping less small-ball and a stable substitution pattern is on the list.) -- Larry.

A: To Erik's credit, he has evolved every season, not just after that 2011 NBA Finals flop against the Mavericks. He certainly has kept the Pacers on edge these past three seasons. Mostly, what he has done is play to the strengths of his rosters. He certainly would have played bigger this season if Greg Oden had panned out, and he assuredly would have played deeper if Michael Beasley had inspired more confidence. So, to a degree, it also comes down to what Riley provides him. Only then can he formulate a strategy.

Q: Isn't it weird LeBron went on vacation with James Jones and Ray Allen, and not Wade and Bosh? Don't you find this odd? -- Layla.

A: No. Don't overstate the friendships with Wade and Bosh as the ultimate factor in LeBron's decision. He grew close to several member of this season's roster.

June 21, 2014

Q: Pat Riley's new criticisms of Erik Spoelstra's defensive strategies bring a couple questions to mind: If Riley really felt the strategy was so bad, why didn't he order a change much earlier in the season? I mean any general manager, if he sees a problem with the approach, he makes a change in format. He does not wait until it's too late. Or perhaps Riley did have such a discussion and Spoelstra ignored it? -- Martin.

A: I don't think Riley ever gets involved to the point where he dictates strategy or the rotation, which is why it was surprising in Washington when it was Riley who said Greg Oden would be activated that night. Also, I'm not sure how simple it would be in midstream, with a roster constructed with Spoelstra's approach in mind, for such a dramatic change. This is all about playing the result. If there was another championship, or at least a stronger showing against the Spurs, then nothing would have been said, and "disruptive" would have again carried the day.

Q: Ira, could the Heat potentially trade Dwyane Wade to a talent-starved team and free up the cap space to sign the likes of Carmelo Anthony or upgrade the roster? -- Luis.

A: Wade, Chris Bosh, or, for that matter, LeBron James cannot be dealt until they bypass their early-termination options (you cannot trade an impending free agent). And considering the lengths the Heat supposedly have gone to keep co-captain Udonis Haslem with the team, I can't fathom any scenario where Wade is moved without his consent, -- Luis.

Q: Did you hear the latest rumor? It’s bad news for us Heat fans. Kevin Love to Golden State for Klay Thompson, David Lee and a first-round draft choice. Is there any doubt whatsoever that the Warriors are angling to get LeBron James after next season? Since Andrew Bogut comes off their books at the end of next year, all they have to do is find someone to take Andre Iguodala off their hands, and Golden State can offer LeBron a max contract, and pair him with Steph Curry and Kevin Love. I don't think LeBron could handpick a better pair to join (young pieces who fit), and to do it in a great city with a great fan base, and a new arena on the horizon. -- Richard.

A: This, Heat fans, is what you'll be dealing with this week, this month, this summer, and (should LeBron continue on a year-to-year basis with the Heat) for months to come. If it's not rumors, it's reports of LeBron and Micky Arison have a slap fight while dining on Whoppers. Ah, welcome to the Summer (and possibly longer) of LeBron.

June 20, 2014

Q: I thought Pat Riley's tone Thursday was kind of paternal, like a father defending his children, but also challenging them and not being one iota scared of what they might have to say about it. Like, "This is the way it's gonna be and if you don't like it you can leave, but you'd be stupid to." I don't recall ever seeing Riley like this. It was clear he had pent up these feelings for a while. He knew exactly what he was going to say and how to answer every question. And yeah, he was pissed. I think his aim was to quash any seed of thought LeBron might have about leaving. And, to me, this is what has set Riley apart from LeBron's former team and probably any other team in the league: Riley has the [nerve] to tell LeBron how it's going to be and he has the "street cred" with what to back it up. LeBron respects him probably more than anyone in the league. -- Moshe.

A: He better. Because otherwise, it's a heck of a gambit by Riley. If LeBron stays (which I believe he will), Riley's position with the team will never be stronger. But if it didn't work and LeBron leaves, it's a heck of a lot more than an error in judgment. It's the end of an era as we know it. I also think it comes down to this: Riley would not be long for the Heat if LeBron leaves. I just don't think Riley would want to have to lead another major rebuild (just like he stepped aside coaching after the 15-67 season). So I think Thursday was Riley saying, "I still want to lead, and I still want to lead you, but you have to commit to my trust." So now we wait to see if an exhale can follow.

Q: I think if the Big Three opt out and re-sign for less money, the financial sacrifices should not be solely on the players. Great players like Carmelo Anthony are available and Micky Arison has to be willing to sacrifice as well, even if it means going over the tax. We need to take advantage of having the greatest player in the game by surrounding him with the best talent possible. If not, I fear the Heat organization will regret it. -- Mike, West Palm Beach.

A: I think it's important to clarify something here: If the Heat add another free agent to the current Big Three, it will be via cap space. And the only way to do that is to fall completely out of the tax. So if it is a Big Three-plus one approach in free agency (with Carmelo or Kyle Lowry or Pau Gasol), then the Heat will not be a tax team at all. The real question is if the Big Three return and the Heat add another player at the taxpayer mid-level and utilize their trade exceptions, would Arison then go deep, deep, deep into the tax with raises for Chris Andersen, Ray Allen, Rashard Lewis and perhaps even James Jones and Mario Chalmers, for services rendered during a pair of championships seasons?

Q: Hi Ira, why would the Heat trade away picks to Cleveland and Toronto to be able to sign LeBron James and Chris Bosh to longer deals when they can just opt out and renegotiate? Can you please explain the logic? -- Brian, Tallahassee.

A: Because it allowed James and Bosh to get higher starting salaries. But you logic is sobering. For example, consider this harrowing possibility: If LeBron signs with the Cavaliers (not saying it's going to happen, just offering a hypothetical), the Cavaliers would still get the 2015 first-round pick the Heat owe them for the LeBron sign-and-trade deal from 2010. And without LeBron, the Heat's 2015 pick could have value. Talk about your ironies.

June 19, 2014

Q: Was it a mistake to use the amnesty provision on Mike Miller? Setting aside whether he could have helped against the Spurs, having the option to amnesty Dwyane Wade would have given the Heat more financial flexibility, or at least leverage in getting him to accept a pay cut. -- David.

A: Amnestying Wade would not have been realistic had the Miller move been bypassed, especially this summer, since you're still paying out the full salary, the $42 million he is due the next two seasons. That's a lot to pay a player not to play, especially when he could come back to play against you. And it's not as if Wade still isn't a quality contributor, certainly nothing less than Manu Ginobili, at minimum. Getting beyond salary, the question is Wade's role going forward. It's not as if he wasn't essential in getting past the Pacers. And it's not as if he's not essential to the Heat going forward. Sometimes we get too caught up in the money. Dwyane Wade is a very good NBA player who had a not-so-good two weeks against the Spurs. But keeping Miller would have made it easier on LeBron James and the rest of the roster on those nights when Wade wasn't available during the regular season. In the end, amnestying Miller might have been penny-foolish, since it gets LeBron to wonder about franchise frugality going forward. Remember, just a year ago, it was Pat Riley was who raving about how essential Miller was to the franchise. And for those late to the game, amnesty is a one-time allowance, which the Heat used last July on Miller. So it no longer is an option for the Heat with any player. What amnesty does (or in this case, did) is wipe out the salary-cap and luxury-tax hit, but you still must pay out the full salary to the player, minus a portion of what he might sign for elsewhere. Also, that player cannot return until his amnestied contract expires. Since Miller had two seasons on his Heat deal when amnestied last July, he cannot return to the Heat under any means until July 2015, at the earliest.

Q: Despite non-stop speculation about what LeBron is going to do, there is one scenario no one has mentioned: accepting a drastically lower salary, like $5 million or $10 million per year. Sort of like Mark Zuckerberg working for $1. LeBron has made hundreds of millions in salary, endorsements and his stake in Beats. -- D.S.

A: First, he'd run into plenty of resistance from his fellow players and the union, since it could pressure other stars to minimize their deals. It's one thing to step away from the maximum salary, another to be earning Spencer Hawes money. And for others who have asked, getting a piece of the team, any team, also is not allowed. It's interesting how after making the NBA Finals four consecutive years that so many are asking (demanding) Heat pay cuts. Based on the groundswell, Wade apparently is lucky he got paid at all after that 15-67 season.

Q: The Spurs lucked out with Tim Duncan, but since then they have not chased marquee names. Gregg Popovich values players with heart who accept his iron-fist rule of team play. He is similar to John Wooden who insisted his teams follow a strict team protocol, where individual success was not important, but effort was. The teams the Spurs easily beat had players with egos who thought the team revolved around them. -- Leonard, Aventura.

A: Look, it takes a certain type of player who willingly stays long-term in San Antonio, with no disrespect to the small-market atmosphere. So perhaps it goes hand in hand that a player who chooses to put roots down with the Spurs is the type of player with limited ego.

June 18, 2014

Q: Ira, you could tell from Tuesday that Chris Bosh loves it here. I'm not worried about him. I am worried about LeBron James and Dwyane Wade. LeBron didn't sound committed, and Wade went into hiding. -- Sid.

A: Tuesday was just rhetoric, although it sure seemed like if Pat Riley walked into the room, Chris would have signed on the dotted line right there and then. LeBron is different. He wants assurances that he will have a livelier supporting cast next summer, and the best way to do that is to hold Riley to the fire, and probably opt out just to make the Heat sweat, and work on upgrades. As for Dwyane, I think the Finals left him with questions that even he can't answer. The best answer might have been the candor of that his body simply let him down. That's at least a place you could go to work from. But there is no mandate a player participate in the postseason media session, and several other Heat players bypassed the interviews, as well. But you're right, it doesn't look good when LeBron and Bosh face the fire, and Wade is a no-show.

Q: Does Wade go from loved to hated if he doesn't rework his contract? -- Robert.

A: I've heard a lot of that, and that's just silly. At worst, Wade will be at the same place Dan Marino was at the end of his career, when Dolphins fans called for a replacement. And while it didn't end well for Marino, he remains a South Florida icon, one with his jersey hanging at AmericanAirlines Arena. Dwyane Wade's South Florida legacy is secure. And the only ones who should vilify him are the ones who walk into their own offices and tell their bosses to please take some of their salary back so potential replacement can be hired.

Q: Is Greg Oden coming back? -- Wilson.

A: I don't think so. I'm not sure the Heat believe he can work in their style, and I'm not sure Greg wants to go through another season stuck at the end of the bench. Erik Spoelstra's testimonial Tuesday was a lot more about praising Oden for the effort he made to return, rather than the efforts Oden made on the court. The reality is the Heat likely would be benefit more with Cole Aldrich next season than Oden.

June 17, 2014

Q: There needs to be a substantial overhaul of the Heat roster. Every position needs big improvement. They need to get younger. -- Erikk.

A: The Heat are in no position for substantial overhaul if LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh all return. That can't happen. What can happen is the three agree to opt out and then decide what outside players would be worthy of bringing in at a sacrifice of their own salaries. Essentially, it would be the Big Three in a room with Andy Elisburg's calculator trying to make the math work. For Carmelo Anthony, they might sacrifice a bunch. For Luol Deng, perhaps not so much. But there is little realistic possibility of them sacrificing for several smaller pieces. An overhaul would likely mean no more Big Three. James, Wade and Bosh hold all the cards, including how the roster is reshaped. And even then, it still will require efficient and effective veterans at the minimum salary.

Q: I have owned a piece of Heat season tickets since 1990 and have followed the NBA since 1960. This Heat team of the last four years has been a remarkable team. Under incredible scrutiny, LeBron always displayed class and he showed up every night to play, even those mid-winter games in Milwaukee. To make the NBA Finals four years running is an achievement worth remembering. This year the streak ended against an incredible team that was motivated by last year's loss. Given the record for futility of other professional teams in South Florida, we should celebrate this team, the coaching staff and management, and hope that Pat Riley figures out how to evolve to face new challenges next year. -- Bob, North Palm Beach.

A: Well said. And worth saying. It has been exhilarating, exhausting, excruciating, but, ultimately, enjoyable. And it's not as if it's over yet. Eastern Conference champion might not have been the consolation prize sought, but it sure beats those 15-67 seasons.

Q: Am I the only one missing Joel Anthony after watching the terrible defense this season? -- Mike, Weston.

A: Yes.

June 16, 2014

Q: Same strategy; same results. Even you have to admit this series was not a good one for Erik Spoelstra. Yes the Spurs were better in every way, but the "Heat way" of doing things was exposed. -- Mack.

A: I honestly think with Chris Andersen a step slow, still clearly bothered by that thigh bruise sustained against the Pacers, with Dwyane Wade a shell of what he was the previous round, there wasn't much more Erik could have done, other than try to get the very best out of LeBron. He adjusted constantly in the series, perhaps even too much. But to give up on a system that helped you motor through the previous rounds would have been foolish at the outset of the Finals. And you could also see that he did not have as many quality pieces at his disposal as Gregg Popovich. Spoelstra eventually recognized he did not have a point guard, at all. And James Jones, Udonis Haslem, Michael Beasley only get you so far at this level.

Q: The Miami Heat spent their entire season in fourth or fifth gear and when it came time to flip that switch to get to the next gear, they didn't have it. Just as you have been saying for four seasons, playing the "we can flip the switch when we want" card is a dangerous game. -- George, Toronto.

A: And yet with the volume of games they have played these past four years, and with Dwyane Wade's iffy knees, who's to say that if they pushed hard throughout they even would have made these four Finals? Popovich didn't push too hard either, he just had more quality pieces at his disposal.

Q: Assuming the core of the team comes back, and a few pieces are added, do you see Erik Spoelstra adjusting to a more conservative approach defensively? The current system, while effective, is demanding and clearly takes a lot of effort and commitment. -- Daniel, North Palm Beach.

A: I think he will adjust based on his system. Without a big-minutes shot blocker, playing disruptive gave this team the best chance. I think players just lost the passion for the system along the way, or grew too fatigued, perhaps as much mentally as physically.

June 15, 2014

Q: Ira, isn't this series a defeat for Pat Riley vs. R.C. Buford more than Erik Spoelstra vs. Gregg Popovich? Riley just hasn't gotten the blame for failing to put the pieces together for LeBron James, even with the financial restrictions. He has always taken the easy way out and not taken the time to develop and scout like the Spurs. "Just go buy me some superstars and if it doesn't work, destroy the team and try again." -- Howard, Palm City.

A: Look, at times like these I can appreciate the frustrations. But Riley first put together the Big Three, then added pieces like Shane Battier, Norris Cole, Ray Allen and Chris Andersen that helped produce consecutive championships, something the Spurs have never had and won't even if they finish off this series. The difference is when Riley got his prime lottery shot, he wound up with Michael Beasley; when Buford and the Spurs got their prime lottery shot, they landed Tim Duncan (after David Robinson). An argument could be made that with more youth and less experience, the Heat never would have been able to get LeBron those first two titles. And if not for Riley's veteran bent, and the moves for Antoine Walker, Jason Williams and Gary Payton, there likely wouldn't have been the 2006 title, either. Riley and Buford succeed in different ways. But they both succeed.

Q: I had the Spurs in seven. My expectations for the series were that the Spurs were simply the better, deeper team, playing better than the Heat. So losing the series won't be the end of the world. I'll gladly take another four years in the Finals with two more championships. But in these last two games, the lack of focus, intensity, urgency and whatever other adjective you want to use has been stunning. How to explain this? That is the disappointment here, not so much that we lost, but the way we are losing. -- Bob.

A: I agree. It is one thing to go down with a fight. It is another to leave this type of aftertaste. Pride should resonate more than it has these past two games. In Game 5, every play has to matter for the Heat. There can't be anything loose, lazy, loafing. That's where reputations are sullied, not by the final score alone.

Q: So the quest for redemption may actually be a stronger motivation than the quest to three-peat. You can tell Spurs want this bad, the way their coach prepared for this series (or this season for that matter) and the way the players have executed. -- Neil, Manila.

A: Sort of like the hunger the Heat displayed coming off the 2011 loss in the Finals to the Mavericks. Now the question is whether the humiliation and embarrassment of Games 3 and 4 are enough to inspire the Heat in time for Game 5, or whether such disappointment first must burn for an entire offseason.

June 14, 2014

Q: Here's to the Heat Big Three somehow finding a way to three-peat and then Dwyane Wade saying, "I've had an amazing career, but my knees are shot and it's time to retire." The Next Big Three: LeBron James, Chris Bosh, Carmelo Anthony. -- Shep, Washington, D.C.

A: Dwyane Wade is not leaving $42 million on the table. There's "sacrifice", then there's $42 million of sacrifice. Loyalty has its limits. And Dwyane Wade in the right role still has significant value. But that also means coming to grips with where he stands, what he can do, and what he no longer can afford to try to do. Look, at times this postseason Wade has been brilliant. But when the shine is off, such as Thursday's Game 4, the luster is completely gone. There no longer is a "1" and "1A" dynamic with Wade and LeBron. There can't be. But the issue in this series is there is too much standing still on offense, waiting for LeBron or Wade for a bail-out shot. That doesn't work against the Spurs. And once they Heat get too passive on offense, they wind up less sharp on defense.

Q: If somehow the Heat can obtain Carmelo Anthony as the Heat's Big Three take pay compromises, and if LeBron and Wade took turns defending point guards, then the opposing team would be forced to use their point guard to guard Wade and the two-guard has to guard James or Carmelo. Mismatches all over. Of course, Wade can only be counted on for half the games. But it's a nice luxury if that happened. In all reality, a case can be argued Heat need a Carmelo Anthony more so than they need a Chris Bosh. -- Martin.

A: Totally disagree on the last point. Bosh has bought in to the Heat's approach and sacrifices. With any outside player, you don't know if that would happen until it happens. In fact, for all the Anthony conjecture, an argument could be made that what the Heat really need is size, and a point guard. Put it this way, if Joakim Noah or Chris Paul were free agents, that would make more sense for salary sacrifice than adding Anthony. As I wrote previously, if you're suggesting essentially an Anthony-Bosh trade, it would leave the Heat at a net deficit. Of course, we could first get through the NBA Finals, a level Bosh has helped lift the Heat the past four years, before worrying about free-agency permutations.

Q: Is there any chance of a Mike Miller return next season? Will there be any interest from either side? -- Bruce, Deerfield Beach.

A: Under amnesty-release rules, the Heat cannot reacquire Miller, through any means, until the contract they amnestied expires. Miller's Heat contract runs through next season, with the Heat still paying off that contract (even though it no longer counts against the Heat's cap or tax).

June 13, 2014

Q: Another embarrassing home loss. Aside from the lack of effort, hustle, and heart throughout the game, the lack of movement on the offensive end, and the inability to get a stop or defend, yet another issue compounding their problems is the coaching. I have never really criticized Erik Spoelstra before, but knowing that the point guards are giving you nothing, why is he playing both with another guard several times throughout the game? And they were getting killed on the boards and on second-chance points, and he waits until the fourth quarter to finally bring in Udonis Haslem? Terrible. -- Myles.

A: And yet for all the cogent points you make, if LeBron James starts off that passive, and if Dwyane Wade plays that poorly, then really there's not much else that matters. The Spurs are a different team with a different system, where it's all for one, and one for all. The Heat are a star system, where their stars have to be at their best at the biggest moments. LeBron was not nearly LeBron-ish enough Thursday, and Dwyane Wade was terrible, after months of prepping for this moment. Three games in five nights left Dwyane without any lift or explosion. I don't think Erik Spoelstra or Phil Jackson or Red Auerbach could have gotten past the Spurs with what Wade and LeBron offered for most of the night Thursday.

Q: I'm guessing there's about a 95-percent chance that Wade will never be as healthy in future playoffs as he has been this year (and look at how he's playing . . .). And he's only getting older and slower. Can Miami really justify paying him anything close to a max contract whenever he opts out? Can they continue to field a championship-caliber roster if Wade is taking up one-third of their cap space? --Kevin.

A: That remains a backburner question until the Heat either get their fourth victory or fourth loss of this series. But it's an issue that has to be addressed head on. Dwyane has had some terrific moments this postseason, especially when extra rest has been built into the schedule. But something is failing him now. The Spurs defense has a lot to do with it. But that's the exact type of challenge a superstar needs to be able to overcome. If he can.

Q: It's incomprehensible to see this Heat team be so badly beaten. -- Chet.

A: Let's give credit to the Spurs. They were the best team during the regular season and they're the best team now in the playoffs since that opening-round scare against the Mavericks. The Heat might not be at the top of their game, but the Spurs are at a level that would win championships against anyone. If they played this well in last season's NBA Final, they'd be in position for their first championship repeat.

June 12, 2014

Q: Should the Miami Heat pursue Carmelo Anthony? -- Nadia.

A: I know that again became a talking point after the USA Today report, but I still find it hard to fathom that a team that allowed Mike Miller to depart via amnesty release would turn around and then spend on a fourth star, even if it came with the Big Three giving up part of their salaries. Remember, the Heat still will be paying Miller's salary next season, even though he no longer counts against the cap or tax. All of that said, never, ever doubt Pat Riley. But Erik Spoelstra also talks about how it takes a certain type of player to fit the team's system, one who is willing to sacrifice, as Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade have done. Carmelo Anthony hardly comes off as such a player, although the influence of LeBron James, Micky Arison, Spoelstra and Riley could potentially change that. Still, it comes off as pie-in-the-sky conjecture, rooted neither in anything offered from Anthony nor even hinted at by the Heat's Big Three. And, no, to preempt a follow-up, I would not trade Bosh for Anthony. Not with the way Bosh fits with this group. Are the Heat "considering" a run at Carmelo Anthony should he become a free agent? Yes. They also are considering a run at every other player who could be a free agent. That's how they operate, having targeted Ray Allen weeks before 2012 free agency began. The Heat brought Michael Beasley back when no one saw that coming, so anything is possible. Anything. Including a Big Four. Or, of course, possibly the end of the Big Three. And anyone who thinks any of LeBron James' focus at the moment is on Carmelo Anthony doesn't know LeBron James.

Q: The way Erik Spoelstra spoke earlier this week of Rashard Lewis' "emotional stability," is that a shot at Michael Beasley? -- Rick.

A: It's safe to say Spoelstra in no way was thinking about Michael when he was speaking about Rashard, especially since the two players are in completely different situations. Rashard is a veteran who already has had All-Star and NBA Finals moments, one who displayed great patience until this opportunity came around. Been there, seen that, done that. Michael is still waiting to make his mark. Truth be told, Beasley got many more opportunities this season than Lewis, especially early in the season. Michael is still waiting for his first big break, something he has to eventually create, given every opportunity to play as a leading man in his initial Heat tenure, and then with the Timberwolves and Suns. The question now is whether Michael can accept a secondary fate this early in his career, something Lewis has found far easier to handle at this late stage of his career.

Q: The Spurs figured out small ball. -- Chet.

A: No, the Spurs have figured out basketball. The thing is, the Heat also know how to play the game the right way, they just don't always seem motivated to put in the necessary effort. Now, they seemingly have no other choice.

June 11, 2014

Q: Is it time to give Tony Douglas some playing time? -- Joel.

A: If you're going to go in that direction, then you're more likely to go without a point guard, as Erik Spoelstra has been forced to do at times this series. But I can understand why you could see the need for a change. Mario Chalmers is teetering in 2011 Mike Bibby territory, with Finals struggles that need to be addressed before it's too late. And it's getting late. I'm just not sure there is any rhythm with Douglas to inject him into the mix at this late date. The Heat's best lineups have been with Dwyane Wade and Ray Allen together in the backcourt, but not if Wade is turning the ball over like he did in Tuesday's first half. But I agree there has to be a shorter leash with Chalmers going forward. The problem is that with the quickness of Tony Parker and even Patty Mills, it would require LeBron James to defend at the point. And when Kawhi Leonard is going well, that could leave the Heat without someone to defend in that matchup.

Q: Clearly the Heat's defense wasn't working in the first half. Why not play Shane Battier? Instead, James Jones played and picked up three fouls. -- David.

A: Oh, don't kid yourself, anything and everything will be explored in these 48 hours before Game 4. There are issues that go beyond even this single loss. Look, Spoelstra pushed the right buttons with Rashard Lewis, and Ray Allen also has been solid off the bench. But the reality is instead of inserting Battier or hoping for more from Jones, there has to be more from LeBron. That's simply is how this team is built. When he has seven turnovers and is outplayed by Kawhi Leonard, there will be issues, no matter the rest of the rotation.

Q: Dwyane Wade has become so useless in the Finals. I guess the time off in the regular season did not help much, after all. -- Ananth.

A: I agree that his numbers have been deceiving, and some of his play has been way too loose for games this significant. The Heat's hope at this point has to be that Tuesday night got his attention. At least he got past the turnovers in the second half of Game 3. He needs to be aggressive, but also smart with his play.

June 10, 2014

Q: Ira, last year there weren't any flagrant fouls or technicals with the Heat and Spurs. Now Mario Chalmers has a flagrant, LeBron James and Tim Duncan were T'd up and Dwyane Wade and Tony Parker are flopping. I love it. -- Sid.

A: Because these teams are getting tired of one another. Like LeBron said going in, it's difficult to establish a rivalry when you're only playing twice during the regular season. But now, with 11 meetings in just over 12 months, a testiness is developing. It's not quite Heat-Pacers, but both teams recognize that a certain edge is required in what is an incredibly competitive matchup. These teams are different in style, yet remarkably close in ability. While neither team utilizes an enforcer, the Heat likely will start doing whatever it takes to keep Duncan from the rim, and the Spurs figure to do the same in trying to keep LeBron out of the lane. It takes all rivalries a while to percolate. This one has been simmering for a year, seemingly approaching a boiling point.

Q: Is Shane Battier's career officially over? I was surprised he didn't get into Sunday night's game ahead of James Jones. He still can contribute on defense and you never know when he can get hot and hit a few 3-point shots. -- Joel.

A: I'm not sure part of that wasn't to appease LeBron, who has been pushing for more of Jones. In fact, I'm not sure Udonis Haslem's token appearance wasn't Erik Spoelstra getting him in after teammates mentioned his potential contributions. The reality is, through Rashard Lewis' length, Jones' shooting and Battier's hustle, the Heat are trying to cobble together what they lost with the amnesty release of Mike Miller.

Q: Hi, Ira. It's better for the Heat to play without Mario Chalmers in the fourth quarter. The best lineup is LeBron, Wade, Ray Allen, Birdman and Bosh. That should be the close-out lineup. -- Wayne. Miami

A: But without a point guard on the floor, it most likely requires LeBron to guard Tony Parker, which drains his energy. Actually, LeBron has benefited by Kawhi Leonard being such a non-factor offensively. Also, counting on Allen's offense late can be a dicey proposition, although I certainly have no issue with offense-defense substitutions. In addition, with Chris Andersen on the floor, it allows the Spurs to keep one of their big men at home in the paint. Your lineup has plenty of merits, just not for the entire fourth quarter. The reality is the Heat have to get more out of Chalmers and Cole.

June 9, 2014

Q: Ira, don't be so quick to dismiss Chris Bosh's 3-point shooting, especially in the corner. Fool you once, fool you twice, he can make a fool of you. Think the Spurs don't have newfound respect? -- Sam.

A: Look, Chris has proven he can step up and make big shots at any spot on the floor, and more than that, he is not afraid to take the next one, even when he missed the previous one. Sunday's shot was huge. But just as huge was his earlier show of force with his slam dunk, and then his hard drive to the lane that led to Wade's game-deciding layup. What I don't like is the notion that Chris should be pigeonholed into any single role. He is a versatile talent who can impact the game beyond outside shots. The versatility of his game should be explored on a nightly basis, and he should test his bounds.

Q: When are the Heat going to stop leaving 3-point shooters open? They call that defense? I call that watching. -- Ed.

A: The goal is to recover and close out on 3-point shooters, at least run them off the line, after first protecting the paint. What made the system so efficient in previous seasons was the Heat's remarkable close-out speed. Due to aging, fatigue and other factors (lack of air conditioning?), some of that speed has been lost amid these marathon seasons and postseasons. If that closeout speed isn't there, then it might be time to rethink the approach. Even in Sunday's loss, the Spurs shot 9 of 17 on 3-pointers in the second half. But the Heat also limited San Antonio to .439 shooting, so they did plenty right on that end of the court.

Q: Who is the better player today: Michael Beasley or Shane Battier? -- Arnaldo, Miami.

A: I assuming you're asking in regards to Battier being somewhat in the playoff rotation and Beasley not at all. Michael arguably is more athletic and more skilled. But the Heat are so much of a "system" team that if you're not operating in lockstep, the entire system can fail. That has been the concern with Michael, who certainly tries on the defensive end, but has not grasped the approach to the degree of Battier. All of that said, with Battier retiring, a summer back in the Heat system could yet land Beasley in the rotation next season, should he decide to re-up in free agency. As it was, Beasley was inactive and Battier did not play Sunday. While James Jones' cameo did not go particularly well, it is clear that Rashard Lewis will continue to get minutes that might otherwise have gone to Battier.

June 8, 2014

Q: Udonis Haslem has done a good job in the past of guarding Tim Duncan. No one could stop him in Game 1, so why didn't Erik Spoelstra use him at all? -- Chaz.

A: To be honest, I thought there was a chance Erik Spoelstra was going to start Haslem in Game 1 in place of Rashard Lewis for just that reason. But the reality is with all of Duncan's early scoring, the Heat still held a late lead. And Lewis did catch the Spurs' attention with his outside shooting. Still, I believe there is a situational place for Haslem in this series, and I think when Dwyane Wade spoke of going deeper in the Heat rotation, I think Haslem was who he had in mind.

Q: I wouldn't be so quick to praise Dwyane Wade's legs in Game 1. With LeBron out, he was supposed to take over the game, be the Wade of old, the one that won games by himself, attacking the basket and getting to the free-throw line. Instead, he was largely invisible in the fourth quarter, save for one basket at the beginning of the period. It was his chance to shine and show the world he was still Dwyane Wade. So if he had his legs, he sure didn’t show it in the fourth. -- Moshe.

A: The reality is that Dwyane, especially at this level of the postseason, no longer is a stand-alone scorer. He's just not. And between the heat and his early scoring Thursday night, he clearly did not have a lot left in his tank. And that's a concern, considering he only played 33 minutes Thursday. With three rebounds and two assists, it was not one of his best playoff moments.

Q: I really wish the games were every other day. There is too much time for the media circus. -- Stuart.

A: But this probably is the rare occasion when, even with all the media scrutiny, the Heat benefit from the added time off, with LeBron James given time to rehydrate and work past his cramping issue. The problem is that with the media-day scheduling how the Heat have to be back in San Antonio by Friday night in order for a full media day before next Sunday's Game 5 (if needed) at the AT&T; Center.

June 7, 2014

Q: Since we are not going to play Greg Oden, I think we should have Michael Beasley available, just in case LeBron James struggles on Sunday. LeBron has no backup at his position. -- Paul.

A: To me this is a no-brainer. The Heat have tried to do right all season by Oden, considering the remarkable commitment he gave to push back from so much time out of the league. But the reality is that even against Tiago Splitter, with the Spurs' remarkable ball movement Oden simply cannot play at this speed. Is Beasley an answer? He likely would struggle mightily defensively against the Spurs' ball movement, but he at least has skills that could, or at least might, help. Greg Oden still could get his ring, and he already hoisted the Eastern Conference trophy. This should be about getting the 13 players who most could help into uniform. Beasley, even if 13th, is one of those 13.

Q: I hate to make excuses or instigate conspiracy theories, but aren't there just a few too many coincidences to ignore? 1. The Spurs fans were all given "noise-makers" before tip-off that could double as fans to cool themselves. 2. LeBron has a well-documented history with cramping, particularly when it's hot during the summer. 3. The Spurs are deeper and have mostly international players who are accustomed to playing in those conditions. 4. An electrical failure caused the AC to malfunction while all other systems seem to be unaffected. -- Shawn, Miami

A: And all Powerade in the building was confiscated an hour before tipoff, leaving LeBron to choose between marketing and hydration. Fascinating.

Q: Does the Heat travel with a team physician? Maybe they should (plus a few portable A/C units). You could probably fill AmericanAirlines Arena with doctors, nurses and EMTs who are Heat fans and would gladly give LeBron an IV at halftime? -- David.

A: They do during playoffs. But as we've come to learn over the past few days, the best way to handle potential cramps is to start hydrating well in advance. Ultimately, for the Heat, peeing is believing.

June 6, 2014

Q: You are not going to win with five points from your top two point guards. -- Alonso.

A: First, there has to be the caveat that Thursday night was not your typical NBA game, so there were plenty of mitigating factors (heat, humidity, etc.). But Thursday also was not an exception with Mario Chalmers this postseason, this time with three points and five turnovers. And Norris Cole wasn't much better with his two points, although at least he also had five assists. Against Tony Parker there simply has to be more. Chalmers has to play smarter, avoid the silly fouls that essentially took him out of Thursday's game. This can't be what Chalmers expected heading into free agency. He may very well be playing himself back into the Heat's price range. More is needed.

Q: Am I crazy to think that the Spurs saw LeBron James and Chris Bosh struggling with the temperatures and told the workers to not bother fixing the air conditioning? Clearly a team with superior depth benefits more from the conditions. What a stupid way to lose a game! -- Adrian.

A: Actually, both LeBron and Bosh were playing well, until the latter stages. The real question is why the NBA wasn't more proactive, sending the teams back to the locker rooms when the temperatures remained in the mid 80s for an extended period. Clearly, there was far more concern about satisfying the needs of ABC and the television partners than staging the highest-level competition. Never forget, these NBA Finals are about entertainment, nearly packaged entertainment that fits within a designated time frame. In this case, the NBA was not going to sweat the small stuff when it had broadcast partners to consider. All I know is you better have a parka with you when the series returns to Miami and AmericanAirlines Arena, where the early projections are temperatures in the mid 50s.

Q: Why does LeBron James suffer cramps when other players do not? Is it diet, lack of fluids or something else? -- Stone, Miami

A: I think it could be as simple as when you have more muscles, you have more muscles to cramp up. No one else in the NBA is built like LeBron. The question might be why there aren't IVs in place should they be needed, considering LeBron history with the issue.

June 5, 2014

Q: Erik Spoelstra reminds me of the year Jack McKeon took over for Marlins, when every "unconventional" move worked. -- Martin.

A: He certainly has not been afraid to think outside the box. But unlike Trader Jack, the Heat return to these Finals largely intact, save for the amnesty-release loss of Mike Miller. While Spoelstra deserves credit for the unconventional approaches, his players deserve credit for being so accepting, from Chris Bosh's willingness to step out to the perimeter, to Dwyane Wade's willingness to play off the ball, to Mario Chalmers' willingness to play primarily as a spot-up shooter, to LeBron James' willingness to defend all five positions. For that matter, Spoelstra's unconventional approaches succeed because of reserves willing to adapt to ever-changing roles.

Q: This year's Finals will probably be as compelling as any of those old Lakers/Celtics Finals that were played centuries ago. No other Western Conference team could have brought what we expect the Spurs to bring in terms of best vs. best. -- Roland, Portland.

A: (Centuries ago?) Agree. This won't be a case of Scott Brooks' questionable coaching or Russell Westbrook's questionable shot selection. And it won't be a case of Frank Vogel having run his starters into the ground or having neglected his offense. These are two teams and two coaches and two front offices that built toward and for this moment. To a degree, the past eight months have been mere prelude to Spurs-Heat II. Another seven games, please.

Q: The Finals narrative by the media so far has focused on "The Redemption." In actuality, this is Redemption vs. Place in History (to be one of the few teams to Three-peat). I hope the Heat's motivation comes from that and not just from being able to defend their title against a team seeking redemption. -- Neil, Manila.

A: I think the Heat's motivation will come from those who minimized last season's Finals win against the Spurs as a fortuitous and lucky shot from Ray Allen, forgetting that the Heat still had to battle through and win overtime in that Game 6 and then go on to win Game 7. The Heat players said as much during Wednesday's media day.

June 4, 2014

Q: While players are the faces of the franchises, this year's rematch is also between arguably the two best coaches in the NBA. After the meltdown of two very talented teams, in the Pacers and Thunder, in the conference finals, I think the executives will take much more seriously the selection of coaches who tend to be under the fan's radar. -- L.K.

A: And both coaches allow their players to play, to find their way through games, never too rigid that they are unable to adjust. In fact, that's what made last year's Finals so compelling, the rotation adjustments and the style adjustments. Both Gregg Popovich and Erik Spoelstra are quick thinkers at moments of truth (taking Tim Duncan out late in Game 6 was not a mistake, but rather a commitment to staying with a season-long approach), while also able to digest a game and return with a more palatable approach next time out, if needed.

Q: The Spurs play a beautiful game of basketball. They move the ball better than anyone, and were able to make enough adjustments to stop the Thunder attack and Tim Duncan is still, well Tim Duncan, with a great supporting cast. But the Heat play defense way better than the Thunder and can also get to the hoop. This should be a great series. -- Chet.

A: I agree. And it will be all about what transpires on the court, and I'm not talking about blowing in ears or cheap shots. The Spurs' offense is what every team should aspire to, sharing of the ball without regard to who gets the shot, as long as it is the best possible shot. And when the Heat are at their best, they're taking a similar approach. It is difficult to find a villain in this series. As Chris Bosh said, Game 8 of the 2013 Finals starts Thursday. Last year's Finals was a series that deserved an encore.

Q: Who is this year's Mike Miller? -- Adam.

A: Got to tell you, there are few questions that irk Spoelstra more than that one. He positively bristles at the notion of a "Mike Miller role," as if another player can be pigeon-holed into such a contribution. Frankly, I don't know which Heat player is best when shooting while wearing only one shoe. I'd say Rashard Lewis comes closest to the mythical "Mike Miller role." But the reality is that in Game 7 last season, it was Shane Battier who turned himself into Mike Miller, after Miller had turned himself into Shane Battier.

June 3, 2014

Q: LeBron James making second-team All-Defensive sounds about right. He certainly coasted on that end at times. It was just a weird regular season. -- Jeff.

A: While there was outrage from others about LeBron's streak of first-team All-Defensive ending, I think you're closer to the truth. The reality is that, across the board, the Heat only pushed as hard as needed during the regular season. There wasn't the type of all-out commitment to the regular season as there was from other teams (including, lamentably, the Pacers). You could even make the argument that LeBron didn't make his typical definitive statement for regular-season Most Valuable Player. But just as LeBron has pushed deeper than MVP Kevin Durant in these playoffs, figure on the perceived All-Defensive snub also fueling him. There are few things (other than winning championships) that LeBron enjoys more than quieting the naysayers, even if they say nay at the right time.

Q: I notice there are three three-day breaks during the Finals. Each comes before a game in San Antonio, and there will be a five-plus-day break before the first game, also in San Antonio. San Antonio thus gets extra rest prior to each home game. Is this extra rest before each of San Antonio's home games intended to provide additional homecourt advantage for the Spurs? For the three days between Games 1 and 2, it also means the Spurs get to rest at home whereas the Heat have to stay in "enemy territory." This scheduling would appear to provide the Spurs with an unfair advantage in the Finals. -- Gregg.

A: Yes, there will be plenty of room service for the Heat in these Finals. In fact, when they return to San Antonio for Game 5 and 7, if necessary, the league is requiring they return two days before in order to have a full media day before each of those games (which seems unfair, since practicing at home would allow for another night in their own beds). In fact, with the shift to 2-2-1-1-1 scheduling in the Finals, I think it should be like the other rounds, where the only requirement is you arrive the day before a game, not two days.

Q: Greg Oden or Michael Beasley, who should bring their sports coat to San Antonio? -- Charles.