Actually I looked at the email. The player, Donald Hall, is not listed as a starter on the player settings page, BUT he is actually promised a start in Sophomore year, so I'm not sure why he is complaining. That will have to be looked in to as that code should not have changed.

This is part of the changes to Starters in 3.0 that fits under the "confusion" part. You have to designate the player as a Starter in the Player Settings. This will be changing both in how players are credited with starts and how you designate them, but it will be a while before that can be updated.

I have a DB with a promised 75% play time. I moved him to #2 DB and have him checked as a starter. He did not get his 75%, and one game had 0%. Again, I have him as #2 CB, and checked off as a starter. I run 4/3 & Nickle.
ARGENTO/ Dabuque.

If I have missed the obvious, thanks for the feedback, otherwise i am just bringing it to your attention.

I like the player settings page too, but the starter designation requirement is silly. You're a starter if you actually start and play. As I understand this, you could designate someone a starter to satisfy a recruiting promise but NOT actually start or play him. That makes no sense.