Thursday, January 31, 2008

A year ago today on January 31, 2007, Molly Ivins passed away. I
grabbed this column pretty much at random from the archive (here too) but it seems to be fairly
representative of what we have lost -- and timely given the recent
debate over FISA:

Big Brother Bush,
by Molly Ivins, AlterNet, December 29, 2005: The first time as tragedy, the second time as farce. Thirty-five years ago,
Richard Milhous Nixon, who was crazy as a bullbat, and J. Edgar Hoover, who wore
women's underwear, decided some Americans had unacceptable political opinions.
So they set our government to spying on its own citizens, basically those who
were deemed insufficiently like Crazy Richard Milhous.

For those of you who have forgotten just what a stonewall paranoid Nixon was,
the poor man used to stalk around the White House demanding that his political
enemies be killed. Many still believe there was a certain Richard III grandeur
to Nixon's collapse because he was also a man of notable talents. There is
neither grandeur nor tragedy in watching this president, the Testy Kid, violate
his oath to uphold the laws and Constitution of our country.

The Testy Kid wants to do what he wants to do when he wants to do it because
he is the president, and he considers that sufficient justification for whatever
he wants. He even finds lawyers like John Yoo, who tell him that whatever he
wants to do is legal.

The creepy part is the overlap. Damned if they aren't still here, after all
these years, the old Nixon hands -- Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, the whole
gang whose yearning for authoritarian government rose like a stink over the
Nixon years. Imperial executive. Bring back those special White House guard
uniforms. Cheney, like some malignancy that cannot be killed off, back at the
same old stand, pushing the same old crap. Of course, they tell us we have to be
spied on for our own safety, so they can catch the terrorists who threaten us
all. Thirty-five years ago, they nabbed a film star named Jean Seberg and a
bunch of people running a free breakfast program for poor kids in Chicago. This
time, they're onto the Quakers. We are not safer.

We would be safer, as the 9-11 commission has so recently reminded us, if
some obvious and necessary precautions were taken at both nuclear and chemical
plants -- but that is not happening because those industries contribute to
Republican candidates. Republicans do not ask their contributors to spend a lot
of money on obvious and necessary steps to protect public safety. They wiretap,
instead. You will be unsurprised to learn that, first, they lied. They didn't do
it. Well, OK, they did it, but not very much at all. Well, OK, more than that. A
lot more than that. OK, millions of private e-mail and telephone calls every
hour, and all medical and financial records.

You may recall in 2002 it was revealed that the Pentagon had started a giant
data-mining program called Total Information Awareness (TIA), intended to search
through vast databases "to increase information coverage by an order of
magnitude."

From credit cards to vet reports, Big Brother would be watching us. This
dandy program was under the control of Adm. John Poindexter, convicted of five
felonies during Iran-Contra, all overturned on a technicality. This
administration really knows where to go for good help -- it ought to bring back
Brownie.

Everybody decided that TIA was a terrible idea, and the program was
theoretically shut down. As often happens with this administration, it turned
out they just changed the name and made the program less visible. Data-mining
was a popular buzzword at the time, and the administration was obviously hot to
have it. Bush established a secret program under which the National Security
Agency could bypass the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) court and
begin eavesdropping on Americans without warrants.

As many have patiently pointed out, the entire program was unnecessary, since
the FISA court is both prompt and accommodating. There is virtually no possible
scenario that would make it difficult or impossible to get a FISA warrant -- it
has granted 19,000 warrants and rejected only a handful.

I don't like to play scary games where we all stay awake late at night,
telling each other scary stories -- but there's a reason we have never given our
government this kind of power. As the late Sen. Frank Church said, "That
capability could at any time be turned around on the American people, and no
American would have any privacy left, such is the capacity to monitor
everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn't matter. There would
be no place to hide."

And if a dictator took over, the NSA "could enable it to impose total
tyranny." Then we always get that dreadful goody-two-shoes response, "Well, if
you aren't doing anything wrong, you don't have anything to worry about, do
you?"

Folks, we KNOW this program is being and will be misused. We know it from the
past record and current reporting. The program has already targeted vegans and
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals -- and, boy, if those aren't
outposts of al-Qaida, what is? Could this be more pathetic?

This could scarcely be clearer. Either the president of the United States is
going to have to understand and admit he has done something very wrong, or he
will have to be impeached. The first time this happened, the institutional
response was magnificent. The courts, the press, the Congress all functioned
superbly. Anyone think we're up to that again? Then whom do we blame when we
lose the republic?

TrackBack

Comments

You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Molly Ivins: Big Brother Bush

A year ago today on January 31, 2007, Molly Ivins passed away. I
grabbed this column pretty much at random from the archive (here too) but it seems to be fairly
representative of what we have lost -- and timely given the recent
debate over FISA:

Big Brother Bush,
by Molly Ivins, AlterNet, December 29, 2005: The first time as tragedy, the second time as farce. Thirty-five years ago,
Richard Milhous Nixon, who was crazy as a bullbat, and J. Edgar Hoover, who wore
women's underwear, decided some Americans had unacceptable political opinions.
So they set our government to spying on its own citizens, basically those who
were deemed insufficiently like Crazy Richard Milhous.

For those of you who have forgotten just what a stonewall paranoid Nixon was,
the poor man used to stalk around the White House demanding that his political
enemies be killed. Many still believe there was a certain Richard III grandeur
to Nixon's collapse because he was also a man of notable talents. There is
neither grandeur nor tragedy in watching this president, the Testy Kid, violate
his oath to uphold the laws and Constitution of our country.

The Testy Kid wants to do what he wants to do when he wants to do it because
he is the president, and he considers that sufficient justification for whatever
he wants. He even finds lawyers like John Yoo, who tell him that whatever he
wants to do is legal.