AngloZionist: Short primer for the newcomers

“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize“

Voltaire

Dear new-to-this blog friends,Why do I speak of “AngloZionists”? I got that question many times in the past, so I will make a separate post about it to (hopefully) explain this once and for all.1) Anglo:

The USA in an Empire. With roughly 1000 overseas bases (depends on how you count), a undeniably messianic ideology, a bigger defense offense budget then the rest of the planet combined, 16+ spy agencies, the dollar as work currency there is no doubt that the US is a planetary Empire. Where did the US Empire come from? Again, that’s a no brainer – from the British Empire. Furthermore, the US Empire is really based on a select group of nations: the Echelon countries, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and, of course, the US. What do these countries have in common? They are the leftovers of the British Empire and they are all English speaking. Notice that France, Germany or Japan are not part of this elite even though they are arguably as important or more to the USA then, say, New Zealand and far more powerful. So the “Anglo” part is undeniable. And yet, even though “Anglo” is an ethnic/linguistic/cultural category while “Zionist” is a political/ideological one, very rarely do I get an objection about speaking of “Anglos” or the “Anglosphere”.

2) ZionistLet’s take the (hyper politically correct) Wikipedia definition of what the word “Zionism” means: it is “a nationalist movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the creation of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the Land of Israel“. Apparently, no link to the US, the Ukraine or Timbuktu, right? But think again. Why would Jews – whether defined as a religion or an ethnicity – need a homeland anyway? Why can’t they just live wherever they are born, just like Buddhist (a religion) or the African Bushmen (ethnicity) who live in many different countries? The canonical answer is that Jews have been persecuted everywhere and that therefore they need their own homeland to serve as a safe haven in case of persecutions. Without going into the issue of why Jews were persecuted everywhere and, apparently, in all times, this rationale clearly implies if not the inevitability of more persecutions or, at the very least, a high risk thereof. Let’s accept that for demonstration sake and see what this, in turn, implies. First, that implies that Jews are inherently threatened by non-Jews who are all at least potential anti-Semites. The threat is so severe that a separate Gentile-free homeland must be created as the only, best and last way to protect Jews worldwide. This, in turn, implies that the continued existence of this homeland should become an vital and irreplaceable priority of all Jews worldwide lest a persecution suddenly breaks out and they have nowhere to go. Furthermore, until all Jews finally “move up” to Israel, they better be very, very careful as all the goyim around them could literally come down with a sudden case of genocidal anti-Semitism at any moment. Hence all the anti-anti-Semitic organizations a la ADL or UEJF, the Betar clubs, the network of sayanim, etc. In other words, far from being a local “dealing with Israel only” phenomenon, Zionism is a worldwide movement whose aim is to protect Jews from the apparently incurable anti-Semitism of the rest of the planet. As Israel Shahak correctly identified it, Zionism postulates that Jews should “think locally and act globally” and when given a choice of policies always ask THE crucial question: “But is it good for Jews?“. So far from being only focused on Israel, Zionism is really a global, planetary, ideology which unequivocally split up all of mankind into two groups (Jews and Gentiles), which assumes that the latter are all potential genocidal maniacs (which is racist) and believes that saving Jewish lives is qualitatively different and more important than saving Gentile lives (which is racist again). Anyone doubting the ferocity of this determination should either ask a Palestinian or study the holiday of Purim, or both. Even better, read Gilad Atzmon and look up his definition of what is brilliantly called “pre-traumatic stress disorder”3) Anglo-ZionistThe British Empire and the early USA used to be pretty much wall to wall Anglo. Sure, Jews had a strong influence (in banking for example), but Zionism was a non-issue not only amongst non-Jews, but also amongst US Jews. Besides, religious Jews were often very hostile to the notion of a secular Israel while secular Jews did not really care about this quasi Biblical notion. WWII definitely gave a massive boost to the Zionist movement while, as Norman Finkelstein explained it, the topic of the “Holocaust” became central to Jewish discourse and identity only many years later. I won’t go into the history of the rise to power of Jews in the USA, but from roughly Ford to GW Bush’s Neocons it has been steady. And even though Obama initially pushed them out, they came right back in through the backdoor. Right now, the only question is whether US Jews have more power than US Anglos or the other way around. Before going any further, let me also immediately say that I am not talking about Jews or Anglos as a group, but I am referring to the top 1% within each of these groups. Furthermore, I don’t believe that the top 1% of Jews cares any more about Israel or the 99% of Jews than the top 1% of Anglos care about the USA or the Anglo people. So, here my thesis:The US Empire is run by a 1% (or less) elite which can be called the “deep state” which is composed of two main groups: Anglos and Jews. These two groups are in many ways hostile to each other (just like the SS and SA or Trotskysts and Stalinists), but they share 1) a racist outlook on the rest of mankind 2) a messianic ideology 3) a phenomenal propensity for violence 4) an obsession with money and greed and its power to corrupt. So they work together almost all the time.Now this might seem basic, but so many people miss it, that I will have to explicitly state it: to say that most US elites are Anglos or Jews does not mean that most Anglos or Jews are part of the US elites. That is a straw-man argument which deliberately ignores the non commutative property of my thesis to turn it into a racist statement which accuses most/all Anglos or Jews of some evil doing. So to be very clear:When I speak of AngloZionist Empire I am referring to the predominant ideology of the 1%ers elites which for this Empire’s “deep state”. By the way, there are non-Jewish Zionists (Biden, in his own words) and there are (plenty of) anti-Zionist Jews. Likewise, there are non-Anglo imperialists and there are (plenty of) anti-imperialists Anglos. To speak of “Nazi Germany” or “Soviet Russia” does in now way imply that all Germans were Nazis or all Russian s Communists. All this means it that the predominant ideology of these nations at that specific moment in time was National-Socialism and Marxism, that’s all.My personal opinion nowFirst, I don’t believe that Jews are a race or an ethnicity. I always doubted that, but reading Shlomo Sand really convinced me. Jews are not defined by religion either (most/many are secular). Truly, Jews are a tribe. A group one can chose to join (Elizabeth Taylor) or leave (Gilad Atzmon). In other words, I see “Jewishness” as a culture, or ideology, or education or any other number of things, but not something rooted in biology. I fully agree with Atzmon when he says that Jews are racist, but not a race. Second, I don’t even believe that the concept of “race” has been properly defined and, hence, that it has any objective meaning. I therefore don’t differentiate between human beings on the basis of an undefined criterion. Third, since being Jew (or not) is a choice, one to belong, adhere and endorse a tribe (secular Jews) or a religion (Judaics). Any choice implies a judgment call and it therefore a legitimate target for scrutiny and criticism. Fourth, I believe that Zionism, even when secular, instrumentalizes the values, ideas, myths and ethos of rabbinical Judaism (aka “Talmudism” or “Phariseism”) and both are racist in their core value and assumptions. Fifth, both Zionism and Nazism are twin brothers born from the same ugly womb: 19th century European nationalism (Brecht was right, “’The belly is still fertile from which the foul beast sprang”). Nazis and Zionists can hate each other to their hearts’ content, but they are still twins. Sixth, I reject any and all form of racism as a denial of our common humanity, a denial of the freedom of choice of each human being and – being an Orthodox Christian – as a grievous heresy. To me people who chose to identify themselves with, and as, Jews are not inherently different from any other human and they deserve no more and no less rights and protections than any other human being.

I will note here that while the vast majority of my readers of Anglos, they almost never complain about the “Anglo” part of my “AngloZionist” descriptor. The vast majority of objections focus on the “Zionist” part. You might want to think long and hard about why this is so and what it tells us about the kind of power Zionists have over the prevailing ideology. Could it be linked to the reason why the (openly racist and truly genocidal) Israeli Prime Minister gets more standing ovations in Congress (29) than the US President (25)?Some objections:Q: it makes you sound like a Nazi/redneck/racist/idiot/etc.A: I don’t care. I don’t write this blog for brainwashed zombies. Q: you turn people off.A: if by speaking the truth and using correct descriptors I turn them off, then this blog is not for them.Q: you can offend Jews.A: only those who believe that their ideas cannot be challenged or criticized. Q: but you will lose readers!!A: this is not a popularity contest.Q: your intentions might be good, but they are easily misinterpreted.A: this is why I define my words very carefully and strictly.Q: but why are you so stubborn about this?A: because I am sick and tired of those in power hiding in the dark: let’s expose them and freely challenge them. How can you challenge something which is hidden?Q: but I am a hasbarachnik and I need to get you to stop using that expression!!A: give it up and find an easier target for your efforts. You will still get paid.

A: I have a much better term.Q: Good! Use it on your blog then :-PThat’s it for now.Actually no, there is one more thing, while I am at it:Open message to those objecting to my use of the article ‘the’ in front of the word “Ukraine”: before lecturing others, learn Russian and learn a little something about the history of the Ukraine :-PIn conclusion, a plea: can we pretty please stop this nonsense now? There are far more important things to analyze and worry about than my use of this or that expression, word or description. If you don’t like it – great. Just consider that I am wrong (-: I often am, so I won’t take offense :-). Can we please stop pretending like Jews and Jewish related issues are The Most Important Thing In The Universe (TMITITU) and deal with the really important issues?Thanks,The Saker

PS: IMPORTANT ADDENDUM: you are more than welcome to comment discuss this topic all you want, but I have wasted enough of my time on this kind of nonsense. Not being a Jew myself, I don’t have to share in any ethnocentric notion of exceptionalism and self-aggrandizement and this is why I said that the topic of Jews and Jewish issues is not TMITITU, at least not for me. So I will not respond to comments to this post, sorry. Careful though – I still loathe racism in all its forms, including anti-Jewish racism (even if Jews are not a race!), so don’t bother posting long anti-Jewish rants as I will toss them all to /dev/null. Fact based, logical and otherwise substantive comments are, of course, not only welcome, but requested. Racist shit, pardon my French, is not.

The Essential Saker II: Civilizational Choices and Geopolitics / The Russian challenge to the hegemony of the AngloZionist Empire

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to get more info on formatting

(1) Leave the name field empty if you want to post as Anonymous. It's preferable that you choose a name so it becomes clear who said what. E-mail address is not mandatory either. The website automatically checks for spam. Please refer to our moderation policies for more details. We check to make sure that no comment is mistakenly marked as spam. This takes time and effort, so please be patient until your comment appears. Thanks.

(2) 10 replies to a comment are the maximum.

(3) Here are formating examples which you can use in your writing:
<b>bold text</b> results in bold text
<i>italic text</i> results in italic text
(You can also combine two formating tags with each other, for example to get bold-italic text.)
<em>emphasized text</em> results in emphasized text
<strong>strong text</strong> results in strong text
<q>a quote text</q> results in a quote text (quotation marks are added automatically)
<cite>a phrase or a block of text that needs to be cited</cite> results in:a phrase or a block of text that needs to be cited
<blockquote>a heavier version of quoting a block of text...</blockquote> results in:

a heavier version of quoting a block of text that can span several lines. Use these possibilities appropriately. They are meant to help you create and follow the discussions in a better way. They can assist in grasping the content value of a comment more quickly.

and last but not least:
<a href=''http://link-address.com''>Name of your link</a> results in Name of your link

(4)No need to use this special character in between paragraphs:&nbsp;You do not need it anymore. Just write as you like and your paragraphs will be separated.The "Live Preview" appears automatically when you start typing below the text area and it will show you how your comment will look like before you send it.

(5) If you now think that this is too confusing then just ignore the code above and write as you like.

204 Comments

You should have some kind of a sticky or link on the front page of the blog for this definition. I find it imporant for people to understand the difference between a jew in general and a zionist (which doesnt need to be a jew by religion at all).

It’s like we live in a twilight zone where so many people and groups want to control views and opinion in such a way to obfuscate their own agenda. And they get away with it because they have so much control over western society.

Fairly well spelled out definition of your definition of Anglo-Zionism, but your definition of racism you haven’t spelled out for us Saker. As far as I could find out the first man of prominence using and as some claim coining this term was Trocki (Bronstein, who in one of his articles accused Russians who were rejecting Bolshevism as imported philosophy by people of Jewish race.

@Frank Bousek:but your definition of racism you haven’t spelled out for us Saker.

HA! I promised not to reply to comments but your question forces me to break my promise since I did, indeed, fail to address that in my post. So thanks for keeping me on my toes!!

Ok. I don’t believe in racism but I oppose “racism”, how is that possible? Simple? Racism is, in my opinion, not so much the belief that various human groups are different from each other, say like dog breeds can be different, but the belief that the differences between human groups are larger than within the group. Second, racism is also a belief that the biological characteristics of your group somehow pre-determine your actions/choices/values in life. Third, racism often, but not always, assume a hierarchy amongst human groups (Germanic Aryans over Slavs or Jews, Jews over Gentiles, etc.). I believe that God created all human and that we are all “brothers in Adam”, that we all equally share the image (eternal and inherent potential for perfection) of God (as opposed to likeness which is our temporary and changing individual condition).

Saker,It’s a very concise and well-timed piece from you. When you are taking so much pain to name the dark forces behind the global AngloZionist Plutocracy who mercilessly plunder the global population, and who eliminates all who resist their sinister methods and objectives, these readers create nuisance about what word is appropriate – surely many of them are agents of those dark forces, and many others are ‘gentlemen’ who would not mind if their countrymen are screwed left and right by the AngloZionist forces, but they will mind if you call those forces as ‘evil’… how strange is the world of learned peoples!

Anyway, hope you will continue to bring out excellent informative moral and truthful reports and support the movements in various corners of the world to free ourselves from these AngloZionist suckers!

WELL DONE! It so happens that as a non-Zionist Jew, I agree with and have thought long and hard about the same subject matter. As a boy, I was accused of “Killing Christ” by-wait for it-Christians. But, I also knew that they were not “Christian”, not the real deal.

I have been to RU and a part of the former Soviet Block, and have met with Orthodox people and we recognized each others humanity. As mentioned in the article, the 1% types are the real enemy regardless of country. And, it will take responsible action by the 99% (for lack of a suitable term) to do some hard and dirty work to make things right. Lastly, have also met Communists, usually the older generation, and they expressed their view and I mine.

Saker, your continued use of the term Anglo Zionisism is, in my opinion, an expression of faulty thinking. It is not one that you are alone in espousing. By using this term you are placing yourself on the same intellectual pedestal as such noted lunatics as David Icke. And, yes, you had to be there to see Mr Icke’s meltdown, in public to understand the depth and origin of his lunacy. I doubt that you want to be a part of that can of purple aliens.

You make some good points. You understand that ‘Jewishness’ is more than just a religion but is an expression of tribalism. The Soviets understood this, which is why they used ‘Jew’ as an expression of race. The exclusiveness of that club has been significantly diluted in modern times but that is not something that has not happened to other ‘tribes’. As a Briton and Englishman I find myself wondering very much what it is to be English in a way that Scots, Welsh and Irish do not.

You understand that there are Jews at the centre of much of western culture and that white, protestants are similarly culturally significant but by conflating ‘Englishness’ and ‘Jewishness’ you are confusing yourself and others.

You, in fact, while justifying your prejudices, made the point about what you are trying to describe and told us why your appellation is incorrect!

You told us that the power behind the throne, Deep State as you called it, is composed of those people who comprise the 1%, the most powerful people in your society. Power here being derived from money and influence in various combinations.

Now we come to the core of why your appellation is incorrect, and, again, you told us why you are wrong to use the term! You told us that while ‘Anglos’ and ‘Jews’ formed the core of the 1% those same people are found throughout the 99%. That is you told us that Anglo Zionism does not serve to describe the group you refer to because it includes much of the rest of the 99% as well.

So, what term describes the ‘Deep State’, PTB, power behind the throne?

Again, you told us what it was: The 1%

The 1% is made up of all sorts of ethnic groups or ‘tribes’, Jews, Britons, Chinese, Japanese, Whites, Africans, Asians – however you choose to describe the mess that is humanity but what they have in common is that the members of the 1% are the ones who hold the power. There’s no particular religion required, no particular ethnicity that opens the doors. Simply power and wealth.

The political issues that have enabled Israel to successfully annex so much of the wealth and power of the US is another issue; a separate thing, but none the less important, but it should not be an implicit part of your posts. You want to talk about the power of Jews in the US, do so, but be clear about it. Don’t imply that I am a part of something I am not.

So, stop using this inaccurate and emotionally sensitive term because it demeans you, confuses your thinking and alienates readers who know stuff that you choose to not acknowledge – all the verbiage above!

When I started reading this blog I did so because I saw that you offered incisive thoughts about matters of concern to me. Your choice to increasingly use terms that alienate readers and confuse others is a disappointment. Stick to terms that are accurate, not emotionally charged and that enable readers to not be confused and you will succeed to an even greater degree than you do now.

Instead of using Anglo Zionist use a term that we can relate to, is accurate and does not demonstrate a degree of prejudice that, I hope, you do not wish to communicate.

I think anglo-zionist is the appropriate term to use. They comprise the main core of the 1%. sure there are Tatas and Agnellis who are part of it as well as the new dynasty of familes from the heroes of the revolution running China and many other people of the world like the 500 families that run Mexico or the 30 families that run El Savador. . The PTB who call the shots are almost entirely Anglos or Zionists. Also “the 1%” is a faceless appellation. This latest system of elites started with the royal families of Europe some of whom are still members but not very powerful – Like Queen Elizabeth is still one of richest women in the world and why do they call it Royal Dutch Shell? I still don’t know which is the most influential – the Anglos or the Zionists. If anything would turn me into an a socalled anti-semite it is the actions of the Jewish apartheid state of Israel.

Thanks for being patient enough to carefully redefine your terms, Saker. It really is to your credit that there are new folk coming to this forum, and perhaps it will have to be explained again and again as it moves more into the mainstream and what is mainstream now is rejected by more people. I urge patience on all the ‘oldies’ as well; the message is a good one.

I want to comment on one small piece of your description of the ‘Anglo’ part of your explanation:-

“…they are arguably as important or more to the USA then, say, New Zealand and far more powerful. ..”

New Zealand may be small, but then again, so is Crimea. The aspect of New Zealand’s wellhidden importance is that it functions as a crucial southern communications link for NSA satellite feeds around the globe, much as a military occupation would do.

It’s not immediately obvious, just two enormous mushroom shaped buildings in the north of the South Island – Waihopai. When I first saw them I thought they were some sort of greenhouse operation, but there has been an ongoing Plowshares protest against them that has finally broken through the veil of secrecy.

This outpost is, I believe as important to Five Eyes as is Crimea to Russia.

New Zealanders are beginning to realize this, and the election there this month may begin to overturn this unfortunate state of affairs.

Very good post, Saker. Agree with most everything. One very slight caveat: Because of the horrors of the holocaust, people of my generation (earlier than yours) will be troubled by anything that could be interpreted as anti-semitism, even if it isn’t. I suppose that’s our problem, but it exists. A clever synonym might help.

(Oddly enough, I can’t remember much publicity about the Holocaust until at least the 1960, maybe later, when it became somewhat of an industry.)

Couple of minor points: (1) Russians say “на Украине,” while currently Ukrainians say “в Україні,” exactly analogous to “the Ukraine” vs. “Ukraine” — it’s always meant the borderland, the Ukrainians now claim it is a country.(2) When Obama selected Rahm Emanuel as his first chief of staff, a civilian volunteer for the IDF during the 1st Gulf War,there was no doubt in my mind at least that the Zionists still had the upper hand. (They can’t get Pollard released, however, showing the U.S. military is still more or less independent.)

Saker, your continued use of the term Anglo Zionisism is, in my opinion, an expression of faulty thinking. It is not one that you are alone in espousing. ———————————————Natoists, let’s vote for Natoists as source of all ill in Europe and the whole world..Natoists is a new term and strange nobody is using it, not even Russians..Natoists does not touch Anglo, Jews, Moslem, Slavs, White, Blacks…Vote for Natoist and nobody will be offended and DON’T use “the west” and you will stop making favor for American Imperial Nationalists.

Nato was created by England and only by England to use American power and other European small states to bully Germany and kerp Rusdia Down. Never underestimate the villainry and evil doing of that beast.

The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses

. . .

The “Rhineland Hypothesis” envisions modern European Jews to be the descendents of theJudeans – an assortment of Israelite-Canaanite tribes of Semitic origin (Figures 1,2)(Supplementary Note 1). It proposes two mass migratory waves: the first occurred over the two hundred years following the Muslim conquest of Palestine (638 CE) and consisted of devoted Judeans who left Muslim Palestine for Europe (Dinur 1961). Whether these migrants joined the existing Judaized Greco-Roman communities is unclear, as is the extent of their contribution to the Southern European gene pool. The second wave occurred at the beginning of the 15th century by a group of 50,000 German Jews who migrated eastward and ushered an apparent hyper-baby-boom era for half a millennia (Atzmon et al. 2010). The Rhineland Hypothesis predicts a Middle Eastern ancestry to European Jews and high genetic similarity among European Jews (Ostrer 2001; Atzmon et al. 2010; Behar et al. 2010).

The competing “Khazarian Hypothesis” considers Eastern European Jews to be the descendants of Khazars (Supplementary Note 1). The Khazars were a confederation of Slavic, Scythian, Hunnic-Bulgar, Iranian, Alans, and Turkish tribes who formed in the central-northern Caucasusone of most powerful empires during the late Iron Age and converted to Judaism in the 8th century CE (Figures 1-2) (Polak 1951; Brook 2006; Sand 2009). The Khazarian, Armenian, and Georgian populations forged from this amalgamation of tribes (Polak 1951) followed by relative isolation, differentiation, and genetic drift in situ (Balanovsky et al. 2011). Biblical and archeological records allude to active trade relationships between Proto-Judeans and Armeniansin the late centuries BCE (Polak 1951; Finkelstein and Silberman 2002), that likely resulted in a small scale admixture between these populations and a Judean presence in the Caucasus. After their conversion to Judaism, the population structure of the Judeo-Khazars was further reshaped by multiple migrations of Jews from the Byzantine Empire and Caliphate to the Khazarian Empire (Figure 1). Following the collapse of their Empire and the Black Death (1347-1348) the Judeo-Khazars fled eastwards (Baron 1993), settling in the rising Polish Kingdom and Hungary (Polak 1951) and eventually spreading to Central and Western Europe. The Khazarian Hypothesis posits that European Jews are comprised of Caucasus, European, and Middle Eastern ancestries. Moreover, European Jewish communities are expected to be different from one another both in ancestry and genetic heterogeneity. The Khazarian Hypothesis also offers two explanations for the genetic diversity in Caucasus groups first by the multiple migration waves toKhazaria during the 6th to 10th centuries and second by the Judeo-Khazars who remained in the Caucasus.. . .

Interesting. I thought part of the first ship was built in Russia and there are Russian military in France training how to operate it. I wonder if that takes into the territory of state expropriation?

Anyway, what’s it going to be? A total ban on French agricultural products? A ban on French flights through Russian airspace? France pays for gas in rubles, renmimbi or gold? Cancellation of France’s gas supply contract?

Decisions, decisions!

I wonder what the NSA has on these people? Maybe it boil down to ‘do as we say or there will be regime change, US style’?

AngloZionists is much better than NWO, whatever that means…but Lenin described it best as Imperialism being the most “advanced” form of capitalism.Control of markets,access to resources, and cheap labour to maximize profit, isn’t that what its all about ?The AngloZionist describes the geographical origin of the problem but not the problem itself, when you transform everything into “a for profit commodity” from art to medicine to the paper money itself, is it any wonder that such a society is corrupt and degenerate, Russia is better but sadly it’s on the same path…

“you are more than welcome to comment discuss this topic all you want, but I have wasted enough of my time on this kind of nonsense”

Your analysis is not a waste of time at all. Most people are inhibited about expressing thoughts about Zionist political influence for fear (a) of being called racist, and, (b) more importantly, of being unable to defend themselves against the charge of anti-Semitism.

But since the Zionist influence on Western culture and geopolitical strategy is so powerful, these fears prevent effective participation in public debate.

By providing a well conceived framework within which to understand Zionist (and elite Anglo) influence in the West, you contribute to more productive public debate.

The concept of race is not indefinable, and is widely used by biologists. A race is simply an interbreeding population more or less isolated by geographic or other barriers to breeding with conspecific populations leading to genetic differentiation as the result of mutation, genetic drift and selective processes.

Besides geography, racial separation among humans may be the result of state boundaries, religious adherence, and divisions of class and caste.

Belonging to a single species, all human races are interfertile and as the result of migrations and conquests may split or merge.

An unpleasant feature of the Anglo-Zionist project for the New World Order is the genocidal plan to destroy human (racial) diversity through mass migrations and suppression of breeding among indigenous populations, in Europe most obviously, but globally in due course, to create everywhere a simulacrum of the American racial melting pot.

One hundred thousand years of fascinating differentiation to be thoughtlessly destroyed within a couple of generations.

“The US Empire is run by a 1% (or less) elite ….. but they share 1) a racist outlook on the rest of mankind 2) a messianic ideology 3) a phenomenal propensity for violence 4) an obsession with money and greed and its power to corrupt. So they work together almost all the time.”

This is where I have a problem.1) I just don’t see2) I don’t even understand that.I see a history of cock-ups, not much ideology at all. Certainly there is an empire to expand, and a desire to do it, but the cynicism comes from individuals or just mistakes, and the administrations get dragged into it.

I don’t think Bush or Blair really understood the WMD argument, they just jumped on it. I doubt more than a few dozen Americans really understood the Syrian chemical attack story even after the UN report. I suspect the US politicians have been told that proof of MH17 is not there… yet. funnily enough i am right now listening to a BBC podcast “Did President Johnson take the US to war with Vietnam on a lie, or was he misled? DD Guttenplan explores what happened in the Gulf of Tonkin in August 1964.”A cockup theory of poiltics.

3) Where is the violence? The decline in violence in the world continues (even in US inner cities). The US has been extremely peaceable (if not as peaceable as Russia). Whatever is happening in Ukraine or Syria, it does not compare with Vietnam, or with the CIA funding of Afghanistan.

Over the last 100 years or so Jews have married into the pre-existing Anglo banking elite and created a third hybrid group that are neither completely Anglo nor completely Jewish but their own separate caste.

(A similar thing happened in the Ottoman empire to create what was/is known as the Donmeh caste. It was the Donmeh caste who organized the genocide of the Armenians as they were business rivals.)

So it’s partly about this hybrid banking mafia caste who have no loyalty to anyone but themselves.

To Edward — Well, as a child I was accused of being a heretic and that I’d “die and go to hell” because I wasn’t a Roman Catholic. I’m a Protestant. You’re a Jew. Maybe we were being pursued by the same mentality/tribe???

Saker (and to Bok Tak who likes to accuse me of whinging…LOL…) I cringe at the term “Anglo-Zionist” because as an Anglo I’m absolutely NOT a Zionist. That said — many Anglo’s ARE Zionists. Perhaps we can come up with a designation for those of us who are Anglos and NOT Zionists? Ya think? I thought ID’ing as a “Christian” would suffice — but obviously “Christianity” has been co-opted by ZOGs — much like Islam has been co-opted by CIA-Mossad (aka HAMAS, ISIS, etc.). True Christianity (as well as true Islam) as spiritual reality has no symbols but God. Nothing else matters. Call evil whatever you want. It’s still evil. Nothingness. Full of sound and fury — signifying nothing.

BTW — since symbols mean a great deal to the SOS (synagogue of satan) — it’s really interesting that the trident (the symbol of Ukrainian nationalists) is a Khazar symbol. You know — the ones that were Phallic worshippers and converted to judiasm in the 8th century… Evil always tells you what they’re doing. And the Tribe wants Kiev back in the Khazar sphere. I saw that unfolding ages ago. Nuland and Co just confirmed it. The trident symbol is their talisman. All “shippers” of satan need a talisman. Something they can cling to. BTW — don’t believe for a moment ISIS beheaded the Israeli journalist. Just another farce to force mind-controlled Americans into war. Onward.

The current situation in Ukraine shows that 1) Ukraine wants to cease fire and negotiate but 2) the neocons in Washington won’t let them.

(nb the neocons are psychopaths and won’t react to the current defeat the same way a normal person would)

This means the split in the neocon side must be between the Kiev government and some other force inside Ukraine.

Currently the possible options for where that split might come seem to be:1) mothers/parents2) Ukraine nationalists3) Ukraine army

The pro-Russian side may not like it but the simple fact is the neocons and oligarchs are using the Ukraine nationalists as meat and if the Kiev oligarchs win they *will* kill or imprison all the nationalists. This means there is a possible weak point between those two groups that could be exploited.

In my opinion, it would be more correct to speak about Levites as those to blame for all this mess we are in right now. These are clergymen of Jews, who have been gathering 1/10 of all profits of all Jews during several thousand years (please look at the Bible, The Old Testament). They’ve collected incredibly enormous amount of money right now, and easily do anything that pleases them and brings sorrows to all others…As for Jews and now the USA, these cunning Levites just offer them to us as some sort of scapegoats for all people to hate because of Levites’ crimes…

“racism” is a subset of “identityism” which is a normal (and necessary) part of human nature and which has both a bad side and a good side. Everyone needs an identity but some times they fight. That’s life.

Political forces in the West wanted to restrict the definition of identityism to only apply to some groups because it suited their own political purposes.

Replace “race” with “identity” (which can be anything) and the world makes more sense.

Based on the latest news from France and the EU, I believe that the relationships among them and RF will never recover. This is a precedence by breaking the contract. So what can actually stop the RF from closing the gas and crude valves to the EU?

I also believe that any NATO muscle needs a lot of energy to run its war logistics in case of a military conflict with Russia. By stopping the flow, they have a problem.

Apropos, I do not understand why Russia really always gets to this kind of situation to be weakened mostly from inside. Having seen all this behaviour from the west they should completely stop any co-operation with them. What else could be done. I am possibly too hot blooded, but this is disgusting.

BTW, this all is not about world hegemony, it is about Russian natural resources. The West to keep going needs a huge inflow of energy supplies coming in to their economies and we are running out of oil….

From it: My Ph.D. dissertation chairman, who became a high Pentagon official assigned to wind down the Vietnam war, in answer to my question about how Washington gets Europeans to always do what Washington wants replied: “Money, we give them money.” “Foreign aid?” I asked. “No, we give the European political leaders bagfuls of money. They are for sale, We bought them. They report to us.” Perhaps this explains Tony Blair’s $50 million fortune one year out of office….

But way more than just a thank you for your personal statement. Both your values and the way you chose to express them — well, I just can’t tell you how good it felt to read them, despite the fact that many of us have certainly heard you state them before.

But that sixth point of yours — if only it could be engraved on, and live within, every single human heart!

A good friend just wrote to me last night, when speaking of empathy, something that I think belongs here:

“I am learning that the chief beneficiary of extending compassion to others is oneself. It moves us towards sanity just as exploiting people moves them towards insanity. We make of ourselves what we become by choosing one way or the other many times a day.”

Fair play, I respect your opinion here and agree with it in principal. It’s a releif to me as an Afro-Brit that you aren’t a fuckwit.

You do kind of contradict yourself a bit though (or give the impression that you do) because Anglo-Zionist term implies you think that the Jewishness of some of the participants in Western Imperialism/Neoconism is ‘TMITITU’but after thsi clarification I see that this is not your point. Zionism is an ideology, and you treat it as such due to it’s leading role in global-imperialist policy.

By the way I noticed how the racist fuckwits never seem to complain about any shady Anglo conspiracy through the ages either. Imperialism, colonialism, genocide, slavery, murderous world finance… somehow nobody’s has yet bothered to write a whole internet full of shady Anglo conspiracy theories about shady Protestant cabals drinking the blood of babies or what-have-you.

I don’t agree with the term “Anglozionist” because it wrongly apportions equal share of political aspirations to the two parties and in that sense it rather detracts than focalizes. The Anglos were always subservient to the Zionist Jews, not bedfellows. These Zionist Jew families that run the western world are very particular about the purity of their blood. Zion is (going to be) Jerusalem not London. So in my view it should be Zionism, plain and simple.

“Granted that AIPAC controls Congress on the Israel issue, but what does the “Zionism” part have to do with the conflict in the Ukraine? I don’t get the connection.”

My take is there are two main drivers of this situation:

1) the banking mafia caste based in London and New York who indirectly dominate the USUK government and media

2) the neocons in Washington.

The banking mafia’s agenda is global and imperialist and the neocons are the same but the neocons also have a separate regional agenda of destroying what they perceive to be local threats to Israel: Iraq, Syria, Iran etc with currently Syria being number one.

The two groups are currently aligned because

a) the banking mafia are at war with the BRICS countries over the dollar with Putin acting as point man for the BRICS

b) the neocons are angry at Russia for stopping them attacking Assad in Syria.

@Lonkal:It’s a releif to me as an Afro-Brit that you aren’t a fuckwit.

I try to avoid that status :-)

I noticed how the racist fuckwits never seem to complain about any shady Anglo conspiracy through the ages either. Imperialism, colonialism, genocide, slavery, murderous world finance… somehow nobody’s has yet bothered to write a whole internet full of shady Anglo conspiracy theories about shady Protestant cabals

True. Racists fuckwits never have. But others have tried, like Howard Zinn for the people of the USA or Chomsky. What we sill lack are the true figures of British imperialism. A strongly suspect that they will be in the BILLIONS when you add up Asia, Africa and the Americas. They will absolutely dwarf both Marxists and Nazis (who only had 12 years to try, I have to admit). And if we add the figures for non-British European imperialism I think that nobody could even wrap their brains around the true figure. We are talking about 1000 years of almost non-stop genocide in one form or another.

I wish I was 20 again to spend my life trying to establish and publicize these figure.

Well defined definition of Anglo-zionist. If linked to the front page, the genuinely curious will have it at their fingertips, so will be less inclined to disrupt discussions about it. Linking the definition wont affect the trolls, though, for obvious reasons, but could make it more obvious to everyone else that they are simply being disruptive, rather than curious.

Thank you for the explanation for your opinion – unfortunately – there are many of us who view the same group of people as being representatives of a moneyed elite as opposed to a linguistic, tribal, or some other social phenomenon.

For example – Robert Rubin’s son married an Indian, who is now an anchor on CNN. She is neither Anglo, Jewish tribe, or Zionist. What she is, is wealthy as part of the Rubin clan – and may in fact be a linkage between a wealthy Indian clan and its wealthy American peer.

Be that as it may, I will repeat: your singular focus damages the good that this blog can do in counteracting the massive misinformation put out by the American and European main stream media.

It is understandable that you do not care; simply a pity that so much potential is to be wasted.

What exactly did you hope to accomplish by ordering Saker around at this point in time? Or ever, really — especially considering that he’s, you know, the host of this blog. That takes a special kind of nerve, don’t you think, or maybe even desperation? And yeah, it pretty well I.D.s you as a certain specific kind of troll.

Anonymous 17:16,

I’m in the generation you speak of, the “h” word wasn’t even in common parlance until the 1980’s and the anti-Semitism canard right now is mostly aimed at people Jews don’t like.

I.e., nice try but still no go.

“No special treatment” means “bigotry”, “racism” or “discrimination” work perfectly to describe any kind of negative attributions towards any group comprised on the sole basis of having been born into it.

Even. Jews.

AGS,

But he’s not talking about you *as you* in terms of your personal ethnicity — only as a citizen of the AZE. As Americans, we’re each of us of our own particular descent, but we’re all citizens of the AZE and unwilling subjects of the sos. (~: I forget who it was who loved your term but refused to show them the respect of capitalizing it! Don’t you love it? ;~)

Anonymous said“Control of markets,access to resources, and cheap labour to maximize profit, isn’t that what its all about ?”

One important thing left out—Property rights—the best, most strategic, used for power, production and private pleasure.

They will own all the granaries and water sources soon. They own the best islands and beaches.

They own the best wilderness and lakes.

The Elite really only want the rest of us to clean their toilets.

It’s feudal princes and serfs all over again.

China and Russia are late to the game. They are struggling to throw off the feudal chains, while the developed masses are being fitted into their own new chains of slavery. Thus the collapse of the American Dream, Democracy, the Euro Union Scheme.

Islam is a restoration of Judaism, without the restraint of ethnicity and completely useless, spiritually, because the Lord already came. It has two more Prophets, One extremely undervalued (let’s say so) and the other very overvalued. This latter would also be the only prophet whom were bestowed earthly honors while living.Apart from the righteous men inside it, it’s part of the problem.

Papism and Protestantism are a return to Judaism, without the burden of Mosaic Law precepts and with a Messiah transformed in a man of this world and into an abstraction completely separate from this world at the same time.Apart from the (always fewer) righteous men inside them, they are part of the problem.

Both these progressions to the past are fertile ground for self-serving interpretations of the Scripture, going from the utterly idiotic interpretations to the completely hypocritical interpretation. In short, the Pharisaical approach to the Revelation.It’s only normal. When you don’t recognize or forget the Logos, you are just one step away from (sometimes very erudite) madness!

The Lord disputed THAT interpretation, not the Scripture. Interpretation which can be summed up as the filtering out of the gnat and the swallowing of the camel!The Lord came to fulfill the Scripture (His exact words), not to dispute It.He disputed those who had made the Scripture their very private income at the expense of widows, orphans and derelicts.

13 But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you shut up the kingdom of heaven against men; for you neither go in yourselves, nor do you allow those who are entering to go in.

14 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense make long prayers. Therefore you will receive greater condemnation.

15 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel land and sea to win one proselyte, and when he is won, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.

16 Woe to you, blind guides, who say, ‘Whoever swears by the temple, it is nothing; but whoever swears by the gold of the temple, he is obliged to perform it.’

17 Fools and blind! For which is greater, the gold or the temple that sanctifies the gold?

18 And, ‘Whoever swears by the altar, it is nothing; but whoever swears by the gift that is on it, he is obliged to perform it.’

19 Fools and blind! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that sanctifies the gift?

20 Therefore he who swears by the altar, swears by it and by all things on it.

21 He who swears by the temple, swears by it and by Him who dwells in it.

22 And he who swears by heaven, swears by the throne of God and by Him who sits on it.

23 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faith. These you ought to have done, without leaving the others undone.

(II) – 25 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you cleanse the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of extortion and self-indulgence.

26 Blind Pharisee, first cleanse the inside of the cup and dish, that the outside of them may be clean also.

27 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs which indeed appear beautiful outwardly, but inside are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness.

28 Even so you also outwardly appear righteous to men, but inside you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness.

29 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because you build the tombs of the prophets and adorn the monuments of the righteous,

30 and say, ‘If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.’

31 Therefore you are witnesses against yourselves that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets.

32 Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers’ guilt.

33 Serpents, brood of vipers! How can you escape the condemnation of hell?

34 Therefore, indeed, I send you prophets, wise men, and scribes: some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues and persecute from city to city,

35 that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar.

36 Assuredly, I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation.

37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing!

38 See! Your house is left to you desolate;

39 for I say to you, you shall see Me no more till you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the LORD!’

Much as I understand your weariness at having to write time and again such useful clarifications, I think that you underestimate a bit their necessity and – indeed – your own brilliance.

I very much think that here is a lot of intellectual honesty, decency of character and spiritual profundity required and condensed in such a coherent position as you just formulated once again. A lot of people, although well-meaning, might just not be capable of taking this threshold on their own, in short order, or might guess something along your lines but recant it in favour of some more “popular” positions, following the “gravity” of this or that propandistic current because they are simply intimidated at the lonesomeness and “quixotic” quality which any position immune against ALL ideologies relating to a specific topic is so easily implied to be.

So I’d like to encourage you to post this same clarification be it every once in two months, and NOT despond of having to do so. Maybe you can accept it as “your ministry” to take the revulsion vicariously. God has given you a talent, use it! Do not care about the idiots, who prompt you feel the need to post it; and who will gloat at your being “naive” afterwards. Be instead aware of those honest, but lonesome people I implied there be. Me personally, I would at times have given much to find someone who just ensured me my nascent position burgeoning along your lines is not queer, untenable, fallacious, quixotic, but just the reasonable, decent, and Christ-compatible way to think about the matters of ideology related to “Jews” or racism in general, at least when some inkling of the real background of high politics be presupposed.

(III) – It’s then a solemn nonsense to state that it did not exist a very defined written text of the Old Testament at the time when the Lord did walk in the world.There were the Hebraic text in the Temple and the Greek text (the Septuagint), a perfect translation made more than two centuries before. The Hebraic text went lost in the destruction of the Temple, but the rabbis were kind enough to write it down anew, with a few amendments to eliminate all the prophecies about the Christ (that the Greek text has conserved).

The original Judaism is no more. The Jews, the people chosen to be the earthly vessel of the Christ, accomplished their task two millennia ago. From that time the chosen people are those who choose Christ! This choseness has nothing to do with the honors and riches of this world.The Jews who didn’t (a lot of them did) choose Christ, did choose Barabbas and Caiaphas, and THAT is their legacy and identity from that time.Killing the Christ and invoking His blood on them and their children, they sealed their fate. After their formal rejection by God with the destruction of the Temple, they developed away from the Torah and towards the Talmud, which is the bible of the antichrist.Rejecting God and being rejected by God, you can only end up worshiping the devil (the separation from God).

37 Then last of all he sent his son to them, saying, ‘They will respect my son.’

38 But when the vinedressers saw the son, they said among themselves, ‘This is the heir. Come, let us kill him and seize his inheritance.’

43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.

This legacy of Caiaphas and Barabbas is not racial. Modern “Jews” have no lineage from the ancient Jews, not ethnic nor religious. That’s just a pretension. The legacy is ideological, so much so that today is the most successful religion worldwide. Hundreds of millions of so-called christians and muslims follow this religion (which has nothing to do with Judaism, I repeat) and its precepts (while a lot of Jews don’t!): robbery and murders (Barabbas), legal exploitation, institutional lies, ritual murders of innocence and justice and self-worshiping, the sin of the devil (Caiaphas).They have made themselves (or better, their bosses, their high priests) the messiah. As the One sent by God did not fit in their cravings and delusions, they rejected Him and morphed their (residual) tribe into a collective messiah, whose identity has lost any racial or cultural meaning and it’s resolved only in the rejection of Christ AND His Word.

You can reject Christ as Son of God, but keeping His Word puts you out of this ideological tribe. You have to sin against the Holy Spirit (the Spirit of Truth), not only against the Son of Man, to be part of the tribe.This rejection is ideological, it’s a moral choice, not a genetic determination.

(IV) – This ideological tribe, these heirs of Barabbas and Caiaphas ARE the problem!Their main battle is against God, every their wickedness against men is made as a blasphemy, as an insult, a spittle against God.They are the progeny of the devil, the assassin since the beginning and the father of lies. As their father, they are moved by the pathetic presumption of being able to imitate the Creator and the frustrating awareness that they cannot, so they vent their rage upon His Creation, above all Its apex: Man!Nothing sates them as human sufferings! But their hunger never goes away….Their supreme goal, seemingly, is the reconstruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. If they succeed, God will not tolerate anything more and the game will be over for this world.

The devil’s main task is to convince everyone that he does not exist. This conviction facilitates enormously the capture of men in his ruses; there’s no worse enemy than the one you think does not exist!The name of the devil is Satan! The Lord says so and He knows a thing or two about him, as He saw him fall like lightning from Heaven.Men are the only tools available to him to carry on his lust for destruction, as he has no power by himself upon the Creation. Only God and us, the only creatures made in His Image and Likeness who unite the two aspects of reality, material and spiritual, have power upon It.Every creature in His Likeness, Angels included, is free to go against God, to choose to separate himself from God. Only men and the devil like slaves, in their deficiency! What good slaves are for the Almighty?

Many angels did and our progenitors did follow their “whispers” since the beginning, separating themselves from God and their fruits as well, together with the Creation which they ruled.The Incarnation made manifest once again the Way to God, the Cross showed that it’s not possible to rely on this world and its princes for that, the Resurrection took away the most powerful weapon of the devil and his progeny since the Fall: the (fear of) death!Opposite to the devil, man can repent, as his sin did not generate inside of himself, as is the case with the devil, but was instilled from outside.Anyway, don’t hold your breath for that. Man is obtuse, since the Fall there’s no wisdom in him. He still thinks he knows better and, after all, the devil does not exist, right!!???

I mean, look at Gaza, at Odessa, at Mosul, look at all the gratuitous, senseless evil of the last century….. where do you see the devil?Look at all those men who have billions and want more….. who rule upon millions of slaves and want more…. who have everything material and are desperate…. who have no material needs and steal, who kill for mere love and pleasure of killing.Where is the devil? Come on, it’s just a fairy tale.

Let’s rather talk about something serious, like the probabilistic wave which has created the universe or the bear that fell in the ocean and became a whale or, better yet, the magnificent lot and progressive of humanity….

Dear Saker: After reading your post explaining/defending/rationalizing your use ofthe word “AngloZionists”, I had to ask myself what is all this about. Theconstruction AngloZionist is at best a very convoluted construction as it takesyou many words to give it form.

Zionism as “a nationalist movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports thecreation of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the Land of Israel”(wikipedia). As a nationalist movement it is political. Being political it has anideology. Pure and simple. Leave it at that. It doesn’t matter what J. Bidenthinks he is because by definition he isn’t.

Anglo is not a nationalistic movement by any stretch of the imagination.

Why put the two words together in the first place? This is apples and oranges.

An Anglo can be a Zionist and a Zionist can be an Anglo. A Russian can be aZionist. A Russian cannot be an Anglo. A Pole can be a Zionist. A Pole cannot bean Anglo.

When you use AngloZionists are you talking about Anglos that are Zionists orAnglos and Zionists? (rhetorical question, no need to answer) (:

If it is Anglos that are Zionists then you’ve limited your definition and excludedthe Germans, Poles etc etc that are Zionists.

If it is Anglos and Zionists then you’ve limited your definition and excluded theGermans, Poles etc etc.

If it is the ‘Elitists’ call it that. This can be anyone (Anglos, Poles etc) inthe present day power structure and it is usually accepted as such. For example J.Biden (who many people accuse of being a closet Jesuit)

4th reich is the point. Descendants of Charlemagne, heirs of the Roman empire and Vatican, Teuton-Germanic dynasty: Windsor-Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (name Windsor taken after WW1. Kaiser and von Bismark were relatives of british royals the same as US presidents )/ Orange-Nassau/ Hohenzolern/ Hanover ( prince Bernhardt of Hanover, fother of Dutch queen, was nazi officer ). This dynasty gave also 39 USA presidents ( google ROYAL PRESIDENTS ) basicaly all who werenot assasinated or survived attempt of assassination- Andrew Jackson. Some of them even wife and kids were killed.

I don’t believe the “Deep State” is an ethnic category at all. I believe this definition is incorrect. The Deep State applies to the ruling elites and more likely comprises the Pentagon and the military industrial complex which companies benefit from nonstop wars. They include companies like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, etc.

These military corporations Henry Gireaux recently revealed on Bill Moyer’s now have their CEO’s in Wall Street investment banks so now the two top recipients of US tax dollars are interlocking.

The very attempt to try and racialize these categories is a flawed nonMarxist concept. The Deep State is ruled by those like the Bilderberg grouping and other groupings of the capitalist class be they in finance, the military industrial sector or Sillicon Valley which comprises and overlaps with the military sector as well. BTW, a recent Counterpunch article reveals it is Sillicon Valley investment companies that largely financialize and provide the capital for Israel. Furthermore, some of California’s largest pensions funds are advised by AIPAC in where pension monies should be invested.

The Deep State, i.e., the Pentagon, and supporting corporations, is what informs our foreign policy in the US, which has devolved down into a military policy.

“I won’t go into the history of the rise to power of Jews in the USA, but from roughly Ford to GW Bush’s Neocons it has been steady. And even though Obama initially pushed them out, they came right back in through the backdoor.”

To the Saker:Hello,As far s I know, the term “Zionism” means an ideology which is not jewish at the basis. Of course, there are lots of Zionist Jews, but you do not have to be a Jew to be a Zionist (you said so), and the basis of the ideology is not Jewish; maybe the following post might inerest you:Who is the ennemy? by Thierry Meyssanhttp://www.voltairenet.org/article184973.htmlgiving a deeper understanding of the roots of that evil.Salam

“Now it was from this very creed of Zoroaster that the Jews derived all the angelology of their religion…the belief in a future state; of rewards and punishments, …the soul’s immortality, and the Last Judgment – all of them essential parts of the Zoroastrian scheme.” From The Gnostics and Their Remains (London 1887) by King and Moore quoted at 607a in Peake’s Bible Commentary.

FROM ENCYCLOPEDIA AMERICANA : “First, the figure of Satan, originally a servant of God, appointed by Him as His prosecutor, came more and more to resemble Ahriman, the enemy of God. Secondly, the figure of the Messiah, originally a future King of Israel who would save his people from oppression, evolved, in Deutero-Isaiah for instance, into a universal Savior very similar to the Iranian Saoshyant. Other points of comparison between Iran and Israel include the doctrine of the millennia; the Last Judgment; the heavenly book in which human actions are inscribed; the Resurrection; the final transformation of the earth; paradise on earth or in heaven; and hell.” by J. Duchesne-Guillemin, University of Liege, Belgiumhttp://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Religions/iranian/Zarathushtrian/zoroastrianism_influence.htm

As with almost everything comprising being human, all is a result of learned ideas, transmitted through culture and beliefs in a coherent package by one’s primary caregivers who received the same package in the same manner. Racism is a learned attribute, it did not appear out of nothing, no child is naturally racist until that idea is instilled by parent, tribe or belief. One possible definition of racism are learned ideas which interfere with fairly addressing some current situation, relation or condition with another in the present. This may save all manner of conditions and codicils modifying the definition.

Your post is brilliant and would add my voice to those commending a permanent link for future access.

Thanks for everything you do, the site is a treasure house of rationality and information.

As with almost everything comprising being human, all is a result of learned ideas, transmitted through culture and beliefs in a coherent package by one’s primary caregivers who received the same package in the same manner. Racism is a learned attribute, it did not appear out of nothing, no child is naturally racist until that idea is instilled by parent, tribe or belief. One possible definition of racism are learned ideas which interfere with fairly addressing some current situation, relation or condition with another in the present. This may save all manner of conditions and codicils modifying the definition.

Your post is brilliant and would add my voice to those commending a permanent link for future access.

Thanks for everything you do, the site is a treasure house of rationality and information.

Part 1@ The Saker,Thank you for your explanation — and for your site.Well, to me there is no perfect expression to call this entity and, yes, they seem to be all (I don’t mean the 1% which include “elite slaves”, not even the 0,1% which includes many “wish to be” (look at “our” DSK and Anne Sinclair who believed they had aggregated to the elite : as soon as DSK could be seen as a capable of independent decisions, they were brutally rejected) but really the very elite, thousands people, both satanist and powerful by themselves), whether Anglos (a bit of Scottish or Dutch admitted), whether Ashkenazes (a bit of Sephardim tolerated), whether a mix.I don’t know if you know English history since the Reformation, the Poor Law, the indentured servants who were treated worse than African slaves because they were their master’s property only for a while, etc; but it is obvious that they thoroughly despise all the “people”, including Anglos. Nevertheless they are Anglos and proud of it…I think it is the same for the Jewish part of the elite.Are they zionists? Well, they somehow supported the zionist movement along XIXth and XXth Century unitl WWII but they also supported the Nazis and many Arab movements who would destroy zionist camps. And, I feel, they still do so, with this addition that they are now the only support for Israël who are, therefore, forced to obey them, may they like it or not, may it be moral or not; and Israel, by side-effect, has become a noted point for trades those people didn’t want to be too open; so an important spot for them.(TR)

I am not a “real zionist” because I feel zionism came from the same kind of big-headed nonsense as the “Manifest Destiny”. It was in no profecy but it pleased many Jews to think they would get a history continuation, without the least divine call… Yet the zionists settled, they bought land to their ottoman owners, letting their “slaves” jobless, and creating a problem similar to Brazilian “Sem Terra” (which, though some were supported by a marxist sect, didn’t take at all such a passionate dimension in the world), and they created an new state, not only with the Jews of them by the way — the zionists were not quite as racist as who you call Anglo-Zionists. Now, this state exists, and it is home to human beings and I would like them to live in peace; furthermore, they seem willing to let other religions get to their holy places. And they are really threatened by their neighbours, and have always been — may I say, they have always been copiously provided for; by whom?After WWII, many Jews, shocked, believed they were hated by everybody (which was wrong, the story of perpetual persecutions is a self-centered tale; there were persecutions of course but not as many, and their “history-keepers” exaggerated them, and some were justified, others were just tax paying etc) and could only find refuge in Israel. They were really, really shocked. Try to imagine : the institutions supposed to protect them, got to chase them to kill them… morally it is extremely violent, even for those who escaped. Nora wrote about the Ferguson event, and thanks to her I heard first about “the Talk” : how horrible! Can you imagine all Black/coloured US males unable to have any trust in the institutions supposed to protect them, and told they were willing to kill them as soon as they could find any “provocation” in them? How can they be citizens after that? The same for the Jews, and even two generations are not enough to change it.So, without being a proper zionist (I see the creation of Israel state as a kind of offence to God, probably unconscious because of the talmudic brainwash), I am a “present day zionist”, would put up with Israel and wish the US not to mix in their affairs, nor in the Arab ones, and the Arab to accept a solution granting Israel safety.And, yes, this “Anglo-Zionist elite” have in both of their origins, a tendancy to “racism” — how could anybody make Apartheid? Spanish and French “colonizers”, although there were such “casting mistakes” as Pizarro who killed all better Spanish commanders to be able to commit his crimes, were not such racists, even revolutionary French wanted a raise of African population to European standards, little as they applied it. And people such as the refounder of Spiritans, who happened to be the son of a rabbi, Father François Libermann, who wrote for instance, to his priest sent in mission : « Faites-vous Nègres avec les Nègres pour les former comme ils le doivent être, non à la façon de l’Europe, mais laissez-leur ce qui leur est propre; faites-vous à eux comme des serviteurs doivent se faire à leurs maîtres… » (“make yourselves Negroes with the Negroes, so as to shape them as they must be, not in the way of Europe, but let them what is theirs; get their ways as servants must get the ways of their masters…” – poor translation, sorry)In fact, all that is christian or properly judaic reject the Anglo-zionist mentality as Mammon worshipping, and here we have the worship of Mammon (greed), Ishtar (pornography, paedophilia etc)… and Satan (opposition and aggression and vilification of all that is truly Christian).(TR)

I agree with the commenter who suggested a permanent link on the first page, for a disambiguation because, right, the expression Anglo-Zionist can be misunderstood.

And…“Q: you turn people off.A: if by speaking the truth and using correct descriptors I turn them off, then this blog is not for them.”Well, I was turned off during a while by writers who didn’t like democracy (how could one not like democracy? — thought the high school girl) but eventually understood their meainings (they were in no way opposed to individual liberties and as much freedom as possible for people to live as they wish, far the contrary) and reasonings and all went better… but your explanation about “words that may shock” is really welcome.

@ Anonymous 17:37, in fact all along the past 20 centuries, masses of Jews converted, mostly to catholicism or islam, thus entered the “general population” and are among our ancestors. Some think that nowadays, little more than Levites remain judaic or secular Jews. Let us remember the Blessed Virgin Mary was probably a Levite…

MUST LISTEN:I find this on youtube and its one you will definitely want to listen to. It contains 2 interviews with Christopher Jon Bjerkne. The first was just prior to the 2008 election, Obama/McCain, and the second hour about 2 weeks after that election.

Its astonishing when you realize it was made 8 years ago, yet explains everything, exactly where we are today, the why, how, who, etc…

If you can’t listen now, save it for when you have an hour and listen to the first hour. I’m sure you will want to listen to the second

That was a very well informed explanation of who and or what governs the United States…it was not for no reason that Pat Buchanan once observed that the United States Congress was Israeli occupied territory. What happened on 9-11 has been the most propitious event that ever could have happened for the Anglo-Zionist. In essence it is a marriage made in the bowels of hell.

No doubt intel level anglos resent when a Sayanim gets caught red handed spying on behalf of Israel and still the Americans can not get a conviction:thinking the Franklin Weisman and Rosen case here. My best guess is that there is deep resentment among all American super patriot anglos who do not conflate love of israel with American patriotism. I believe they have started a pushback of sorts and have seen what i perceive to be signs several times that to me point in that direction.

Your effort has been a constant delight and source of information to me these last six months. Please keep going.

To contribute to, or perhaps complicate, matters I would like to draw your attention to the novel Dictionary of the Khazars by Milorad Pavich (1984). Many found it hard to understand, but perhaps the murder comitted in Novorussia now has been foreseen 30 years ago by this historian in this novel presenting differing views on the conversion of Khazars to Christianity, Islam and Judaism 12 centuries ago.

There ara Khazars in nowdays Afganistan and Iran, that are not of Jewish religion, as well as many Ortodox Christians in nowdays Novorussia or Ukraine of khazarian ancestry.

You are an honest man, my friend, but you will get little thanks for it. Here in Canada, it is almost an offense to read these sentiments. Thus, I linked to it on Facebook, and Harper can kiss my rear end.

I can’t believe all the retards here who are either confused or offended by Saker’s use of the term “AngloZionists” which I believe is spot on. These people can sit here and parse your words all day – is it because they are dull-witted, or because you might have jarred them off their little soapbox a bit?After reading this blog for awhile, how can anyone so easily misunderstand that which Saker has gone to such pains to explain? Please piss off and go over to Fox News or CNN where you will NEVER, EVER hear the term Zionist used at all, so as not to confuse your widdle bwains or offend your tender sensibilities.

Sitemap

Saker Android App

An Android App has been developed by one of our supporters. It is available for download and install by clicking on the Google Play Store Badge above.

All the original content published on this blog is licensed by Saker Analytics, LLC under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 4.0 International license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0). For permission to re-publish or otherwise use non-original or non-licensed content, please consult the respective source of the content.