This must be the dumbest post I have ever read on here, and that is saying something.
1, to credit JJ Watt and completely overlook Von Miller being just as dominant, if not more dominant than Watt.
2, the award is most valuable. Peyton Manning has turned the Broncos around and made them a force on offense, which greatly helps the defense. Manning changed teams, new players, "new" scheme, and he still has put up amazing numbers and made the Broncos a legit Super Bowl contender after everybody had been laughing at them for playing Tebow.

Peyton isn't playing a new scheme. THat's essentially the same O he ran in Indy.

IMO JJ Watt is having a more dominant season than Von Miller. Both look beast, but for a down Dlineman to be as disruptive as JJ Watt has been off the snap is crazy.

Yeah Miller is a beast in his own right but for the first half of this season I was ready to say Watt should be considered seriously for mvp. He was just absolutely beasting, and even tho the stats wont show it much he still got to Brady pretty frequently the other night.

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottyboy

wait. Brady's only thrown 3 int's the whole year? woah.

How could anyone not say he's the mvp? goodness.

He's on a whole 'nother level

Night and Day baby

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by WMD

Jesse realizing Walt was Santa Claus could really shake things up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gpngc

I don't know how old you are, but if you can get to 24/25 without getting arrested or killed, you've done well for yourself lol.

I did but clearly you didn't want to actually read what I said. I stated that Peterson makes the Vikings from being a bad team to a middle of the road team. Brady makes the Pats consistent Superbowl contenders and the only year they haven't won the division with him there since 2002 was the year he was hurt. When talking of relative value then how does that not make sense?.

I was just picking out your example. When your starting QB goes down, you pray to hell you can win 11 games. You simply say they missed the playoffs (before, now it's you not winning the division). You won 11 games. That is an anomaly. You didn't miss the playoffs because Brady went down, but because the AFC had a season with teams of ridiculous records.

Winning 11 games with your backup QB. Sounds like a lot of talent and coaching all around. It'd be amazing if the Vikings could win 11 games with their starting quarterback.

I know, that was years ago. Has no bearing with this Patriots team now. I just didn't like that example.

Another edge for Brady over Mannning: NE has scored like 90 more points than any other team in the NFL this year.
They are a juggernaut.
A steam roller.
And Mr Giselle is the captain of that ship.
Brady, as of right now (3 big games remain), is the #1 QB, edging Manning, with Arod in 3rd.

But Peterson is head & shoulders above all other RBs.... Watt slight edge over Von Miller and Alden Slim Shady Smith.

The Vikings would be 0-13 without Peterson.
Their 7 wins are all because of him.
We've seen NE win 10 games without Brady as Little Bill is God on the sidelines.
Denver made the playoffs, won a playoff game, with a QB last year who can't even get a snap for a horrible Jets offense this year.

Why does it matter if Peterson breaks a record? The MVP should go to the MVP, regardless of statistical records. Would it hurt AD's cause if he finished 1 yard shy of the record? Brees didn't get the MVP last year after throwing the most yards ever. The most important thing is that he keeps playing well and the Vikings keep winning.