Is Bureaucracy Killing a Young Epileptic Woman?

She is but a pawn in the hands of the State, a large attorney firm, and care home providers. They control
her life through psychiatric drugs which leave her mostly in a lethargic condition. Her parents have fought
to regain her custody for years and now they have been restricted to one short visit a month. Such a visit
brings pain to the eyes of Nancy who wonders why they won't take her home and why they leave her in this place.

Meet Nancy Golin

Nancy's life changed when an arrogant intern doctor at Stanford University Hospital made the wrong call. This
intern took it upon herself to declare that the parents of Nancy were "over medicating" the young
woman for her seizures. She reduced the amount of medication Nancy was receiving only to start her seizures
again. A neurologist had prescribed the exact dosage that the parents of Nancy had been administrating. A
neurologist at Stanford University Hospital interceded and restored the proper dosage to Nancy which stopped
the seizures. Nancy went home with her parents and that should have been the end of it.

But the intern, ignoring the Hospital's neurologist and Nancy's personal neurologist, notified Adult
Protective Services and filed a complaint against Nancy's parents, stating they were over medicating her
and therefore were abusing her.

Adult Protective Services made five or six calls on the parents of Nancy, investigating the allegations
of the intern. Then things became silent. Adult Protective Services knew or should have known that Nancy's
private neurologist and the neurologist at Stanford University Hospital acknowledged that the dosage
Nancy was being given by her parents was correct and necessary. At this point the files should have been
closed - and that is exactly what Nancy's parents thought. But not so! The Adult Protective Services'
files were not corrected to reflect the reports of two neurologists.

Over a year later police arrived with an Adult Protective Services agent and whisked Nancy away;
placing her in a psychiatric ward for "her protection." Under the law her placement was illegal.
The psychiatric ward reduced Nancy's Phenobarbital seizure medication to the same lower levels as the
intern had recommended - a dosage vetoed by the Stanford neurologist; the seizure began again.

If you reside in California and are having issues with the way CPS operates, please
contact Dennis Morris.

While this is all going on the District Attorney's office files charges against the parents for
abuse of Nancy for over medicating. The District Attorney's file show no mention of the neurologists
reports contradicting the allegation. Nancy was never allowed to go home again.

The Stanford neurologist's interceded but it didn't matter because they had to hold onto
Nancy after that because of the injuries they did. They had other things they tried to pull,
like the burn injury to the top of Nancy's foot which Stanford doctors, themselves, had caused
five months earlier by a misplaced IV that they then refused to treat, then called this a
neglected foot injury of unknown origin after it had already been treated and healed. Despite
all that, the District Attorney Office continued the criminal case against the parents for
14 months before it was dropped.

The reason the District Attorney's Office kept the criminal charges of abuse and neglect so long was to
allow the State of California to secretly apply for and obtain a temporary conservatorship over Nancy.
As long as the parents were under criminal charges, they were not eligible to fight the conservatorship.
Even when the State went to court over the conservatorship they told the judge that they could not find
the parents. The parents were visiting Nancy every week at the care facility. In fact the District
Attorney's Office had the couple arrested on felony abuse charges. The District Attorney's Office
offered to drop the charges down to a misdemeanor and a slap on the wrist. The parents refused the
offer.

The parents rejected any lesser charge for fear that a plea bargain would mean they would never see
their daughter again.

When one judge ruled favorably for the parents, the State went shopping for a new judge. The new
judge ignored the expert testimony of the neurologist in favor of written memos from the State. The
law does require more credence in court for live witnesses as opposed to written memos. The Public
Defender's Office represented Nancy. Because the conservatorship was awarded to the State, the parents
were denied by the court to the discovery process. The parents were stripped of any legal rights in
relationship to their daughter. The Court even reduced the amount of time the parents would have for
visitation rights. Nancy saw her parents less and less and felt deserted.

The drugs they were giving to Nancy began to eat away at her esophagus. "They're killing her,
she can't swallow," the parents complained. The esophagus problem continued, however, until the
parents suspect that Nancy has throat cancer. The parents have not been allowed to see Nancy's medical
records. Nancy had a precancerous condition two years ago which was left untreated by her State
conservators.

The parents have gone to State and Federal Courts - including the United States Supreme Court, but
the Federal Courts have rejected the case on the basis they don't have jurisdiction. The State has
paid $2 million dollars in Court to keep Nancy. The parents have had no way of amassing such a sum
and have, at times, represented themselves in Court.

The parents' visitation rights were reduced to one hour per month. When the parents are allowed
to visit, Nancy keeps asking to go home and doesn't understand why she cannot. Many times on their
visits the parents would find Nancy in a comatose status.

But there is much more behind this case as to why the State, Courts and others want Nancy - and
victims like her.

This article originally ran in the Napa Sentinel on April 15, 2005. Reposted
here with permission from the Golin family.