Death to Islam! [Reprised to mark latest Islamatrocities in ... I've given up itemising the locations. Today, October 31, 2017: New Yorkistan.]

Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Mon, 2006-02-06 23:49

[Note—June 13, 2016, following the killing of 50+ attendees at an Orlando gay nightclub: I hope LGBT moronnials, the Pink Swastika carriers who support the Islamappeasing agenda of Obama and remain silent, as he does, about Islam's routine killing of gays while loudly propounding a totalitarian PC agenda of their own, will be awakened by yesterday's slaughters to the nature of Islam in particular and tyranny in general.]

No, this is not a call to genocide. I leave that to the Islamo-fascist filth who yearn to perpetrate it: “Death to Israel!” “Death to America!” “Death to the Infidel!” and so on.

They’ve been out in force recently, these squalid savages, these bigoted barbarians, these hysterical humanity-haters, these tawdry terrorists, these god-ridden grotesqueries, these ignoble ignoramuses, these genocidal jihadists … burning flags and embassies because their super-superstitious sensibilities were offended by some cartoons in a Danish newspaper. In London they took advantage of the freedom they so despise, this murderous mass of Muslim maggotry, to infest the streets, sporting signs such as “Freedom Go To Hell!” “Prepare For The REAL Holocaust!” and “Annihilate [massacre, exterminate/butcher/behead] those who would insult Islam!” In the name of humanity, Islam must be put to death. Not by nuking, but by shaming. Not by the sword (though if the maggots leave us no alternative we should not hesitate to use it) but by the word. Human beings worthy of the title must rise up and shout in irresistible unison: “Enough of this primordial primitivism! We who are civilised are revolted by it and shall rebuff it at every turn!” Muslims must discover rationality and decency; Westerners must rediscover them, and, as a matter of urgency, speak up for them! All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for cowards to appease it—and Islam is the locus of evil in the contemporary world.

There’s been far too much appeasement of it. The U.S. State Department, with merely a nod in the direction—rather than a ringing defence—of freedom of the press, has pronounced the cartoons, lampooning Mohammed, “unacceptable” because they cause “offence” to Muslims. Would cartoons ridiculing Stalin have been deemed unacceptable for causing offence to communists? Has the State Department forgotten that there is no such thing as a right not to be offended? That free speech includes the right to say things others will find offensive? CNN has declined to screen the cartoons “out of respect for Islam.” Leaving aside that Islam is not worthy of an iota of respect (while the right to believe in it or any other form of nonsense is worthy of utmost respect), has CNN forgotten that the freedom of publication on which it is so reliant is endangered by such cowardly self-censorship? Even the Danish newspaper that originally published the cartoons—precisely as a challenge to the maggots’ insistence that their feelings be given special consideration—has apologised for causing offence. Freedom, and with it the world, is perishing from an orgy of apologising to a global harem of empty-headed, malevolent umbrage-takers.

Let us not forget that while Muslims are the locus of totalitarianism, they are aided and abetted by an array of allied ayatollahs, woeful witch-doctors of every hue. I quote from the Horror File of the upcoming Free Radical:

“Christian and Muslim church leaders have rallied to stop a South Park episode, that depicts the Virgin Mary bleeding, from going to air. … The episode, which the CanWest channel plans to screen in May, shows a statue of the Virgin Mary bleeding. A cartoon character of Pope Benedict is called to investigate and declares she is menstruating. ‘Chicks bleed all the time’ he says. … Catholic Communications Director Lyndsay Freer said representatives of the Council of Christians and Jews and Council of Christians and Muslims, Anglican Bishops, the Salvation Army and other church leaders have signed the letter requesting that C4 not screen the episode. ‘The letter pointed out it would give offence to a great many people.’ (Dominion Post, January 30, 2006)"

Yes, a global harem of umbrage-takers. Reassuringly, C4 is going to screen the episode regardless of these two-bit totalitarians. And television channels and most major newspapers in New Zealand have not only published the Danish cartoons but defended their right to do so. The Dominion Post, in an editorial that is superior to most of what has come out of mainstream American media on the subject, said:

“Modern society rests on the contest of ideas, the ability to question perceived wisdom and to challenge authority. Without that contest, and without the right to free speech that makes it possible, societies stultify and become entrenched in their beliefs. That freedom to question and to challenge must include the right to be offensive, to affront people’s most heartfelt beliefs, even to disparage that which they hold sacred. Otherwise it is an empty freedom. … There have been earlier cultural confrontations between the West and a resurgent Islam, beginning with the death sentence pronounced in 1989 on author Salmon Rushdie for The Satanic Verses, and including the murder in 2004 of Dutch film-maker Theo van Gogh after he made a film dealing with violence against Islamic women. They are confrontations the West cannot afford to lose. The right to freedom of speech is a precious one that must be defended.”

It cannot be defended—indeed, it can only be betrayed—by apologetic weasel-worders appeasing militant, murderous morons whose savage pseudo-sensibilities have been stirred, not by sticks and stones, but by words. May men of righteous rationality reignite the flame of reason and fight an unapologetic philosophical jihad in its holy name, that it may illumine the globe and save the world from another Dark Ages. Death to Islam—and all forms of tyranny over the minds of men!

Does anyone know: How much does The Ayn Rand Institute defend the magnificent and heroic, anti-Muslim, cultural warriors Pamela Geller and Bosch Fawstin? How much does The Atlas Society? How about the American libertarians and Cato Institute?

Young Kiwi convert to Islamosavagery plots to mow people down and stab them in the name of Allah: gets name suppression, counselling by a local Muslim ... blah, blah, blah. Sickening.

The court has adopted a rehabilitative approach to the teen's sentencing, with Judge Stephen O'Driscoll releasing him on intensive supervision with a list of conditions and a warning that if he breaches the conditions or reoffends, he will likely be sent to prison.

Among the conditions – which will apply for two years while the judge monitors his progress – is counselling by a member of the local Muslim community.

The youth's name is suppressed and the details of the offending cannot be published. He has admitted eight charges. People were frightened by his actions during the incident last year, and damage was done, but no-one was hurt before he was held until the police arrived.

Lange said even though the youth had been treated for months by the youth forensic psychiatric team, he was still seen as a high risk of reoffending, and a risk to family members and members of the public.

He said the primary consideration was the protection of the community, and the teenager's rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

Of course, a mere mozzie bite according to ARISIS Obleftivist tweasonist Yawon Bwook.

#Death to Islam!! Death to Obleftivism!!

"May men of righteous rationality reignite the flame of reason and fight an unapologetic philosophical jihad in its holy name, that it may illumine the globe and save the world from another Dark Ages. Death to Islam—and all forms of tyranny over the minds of men!"

"Italy holds national elections on March 4 and immigration has become a major campaign issue, with center-right opposition parties accusing the center-left government of doing too little to stop the influx of newcomers.

“We have to decide if our ethnicity, if our white race, if our society continues to exist or if our society will be rubbed out,” Attilio Fontana, the League candidate to become the next head of the wealthy Lombardy region, told Radio Padania.

Facing a barrage of condemnation for his comments, Fontana later said it had been a “lapse”. But he received swift support from party leader, Salvini, whose popularity has risen strongly in recent years thanks to his anti-migrant stance.

“We are under attack. Our culture, society, traditions and way of life are at risk,” he said in a statement.

“The color of one’s skin has nothing to do with it, but the risk is very real. Centuries of history risk disappearing if Islamization, which up until now has been underestimated, gains the upper hand,” Salvini added.

Salvini has pushed the League -- a regional power that at times has called for secession -- to the far-right of European politics, allying himself with the anti-Islam Freedom Party in the Netherlands and looking to tap into popular concern over mass migration."

The Italian elections on the 4th of March will see the right-wing coalition win. I'm calling it here. The coalition is formed by two main parties, Berlusconi's Forza Italia (yes, that Berlusconi), and Salvini's "League" (what used to be the North League).

If the League manages to get the same or more votes than Forza Italia, the Government will be heavily anti-invasion and anti-suicide.

"The citizens of Paris and the millions of tourists who visit her every year are forced to accept that the city of lights has been extinguished, civilisation has ceased and it has become a garrison of garbage."

Richard -- I'm painfully aware that these "migrants" and "youths" (don't call them sand-niggers! ) are doing horrific stuff in the West every day which doesn't make the newspapers or t'v', and which well exceeds the activities of their Christian, Jewish, Mormon, Hindu, Buddhist, agnostic, and atheist rivals.

On the contrary, Kyrel. They have been doing plenty. There has just been no major (although plenty of smaller) attacks in Western countries. Follow the counter-jihad sites closely and you won't lose sight of it. Also, from my experience, when I start to think there have been no major attacks for awhile a major attack is usually not too far away.

This giant news story has, amazingly, never been reported in the American news media to my knowledge. Evidently there's 1,000 car fires every New Year's Eve in France, and 40,000 every year overall -- most evidently done by Muslims.

In future, if anyone wants to devastate or destroy the West, or some other virtuous group of people, all they have to do is poorly pretend to divide themselves up into two groups: the radicals/extremists and the moderates/normals. This way some utterly monstrous group like, say, the Slavery And Genocide For All nation, philosophy, religion, etc. can do as much heartless evil and mass-slaughter as it wants against the West, and we dare not verbally defend ourselves or criticize our enemies and destroyers. If we do, the SAGFAns will just say: "Hey, we're not guilty of anything. We have nothing to do with it. Those are radical/extremist SAGFAns -- not the real ones. Anyone who blames us is just a bigot, racist, and ultimately deserves what they're getting with all those limitless SAGFAn atrocities. We real SAGFAns are your true friends and best allies. But if you condemn all of us, then you're just goading us to join up with the radicals, and justifying all of their behavior."

It would be nice if Jim and Amy came here to discuss these issues but based on my experience with those two they aren't interested in debating unless you agree with terms that are so harsh that no self-respecting person could accept.

They are both here already, but of course they won't front up or man up to debate these issues. They are dishonest Obleftivist cultists. I'm especially disgusted with James, who, contrary to what you argue, set the record straight on Rand and the Brandens. High standards in one context, no standards in another—just an ARISIS shill.

It would be nice if Jim and Amy came here to discuss these issues but based on my experience with those two they aren't interested in debating unless you agree with terms that are so harsh that no self-respecting person could accept. In my debate proposal all I asked was that my PARC critique and my amazon review of Creating Christ were linked to on Amy's show page notes. That was too much to ask for.

... e.g., James Valliant, Casey Fahey, Amy Peikoff, Leonard Peikoff et al: why are you allowing/enabling this takeover of Objectivism by an evil, alien cabal of ex-Scientologists, Globalists, intrinsicists, open borders treasonists, Islamapologists, et al, ad nauseam ... with nary a word of protest??!! Where are you, David Kelley? Part of the problem? For all my disagreements with Barbara Branden, I know she would have fought this, fiercely. Is what Wynand said true after all: that there's no integrity in the world, anywhere?

It's worth noting that on the NBC [Natioanl Broadcast Company, one of four major networks] national t'v' news about 30 minutes ago the word "Islam" and "Muslim" wasn't mentioned for the first 6.5 minutes, even tho' there was much discussion of who the murderer was, and what was his motivation and inspiration, for such a monstrous act.

This story has largely been ignored by the Objectivist world. OK, they don't agree with affirmative action, but they can't see how evil it was what Minnesota did. They can't admit that allowing millions of these kinds of people into the country is making our situation worse, "irregardless" of how much self-esteem Americans have or should have.

On the video I linked to Brook said that "Mexicans aren't killing anybody" (in the US). Then why are there as many Hispanics in US prisons for murders as whites?

It isn't inevitable in a multicultural society. It is inevitable in the face of the undeclared war. Have they said yet who did this? Maybe it was Shia on Sunni. Or even Sunni on Muslims they consider apostates.

While it's disgraceful to attack Muslims, it's inevitable in a multicultural society. Even in Sunni Saudi Arabia the Shites attack; there was just an attack by Sunnis against the (Shiite) Iranian Parliament.

Islamofilth are calling this latest Islamatrocity in Londonistan an act of Islamophobia. Doesn't get much more Orwellian than this. Meanwhile the usual nauseating platitudes from politifilth. Note how these outrages are now routinely referred to as "incidents."

To Iran with all Muslims and politifilth and their Obleftivist enablers!

The Muslim Council of Britain has confirmed that worshippers leaving Finsbury Park Mosque were targeted when a van ran into them, adding: ‘Our prayers are with the victims.’
One person has been killed and eight have been taken to hospital with two others being treated at the scene following the terror attack.

Secretary general Harun Khan said: ‘During the night, ordinary British citizens were set upon while they were going about their lives, completing their night worship.

‘My prayers are with the victims and their families. It appears from eyewitness accounts that the perpetrator was motivated by Islamophobia.

‘Over the past weeks and months, Muslims have endured many incidents of Islamophobia, and this is the most violent manifestation to date.

‘Given we are approaching the end of the month of Ramadan and the celebration of Eid with many Muslims going to local mosques, we expect the authorities to increase security outside mosques as a matter of urgency.’

Mr Khan added: ‘Many will feel terrorised, no doubt be angry and saddened by what has taken place tonight.

‘We urge calm as the investigation establishes the full facts, and in these last days of Ramadan, pray for those affected and for justice.’

‘According to eye witnesses this was a deliberate attack against Innocent Muslims going about their life.

Forensics teams working at the scene this morning where a man was killed (Picture: Getty)
‘We should make clear that if this attack is confirmed as a deliberate terrorist attack then this should be classed as an act of terrorism.

‘The British Muslim community requires all decent people to stand with us against this evil violence.

‘Rampant Islamaphobia has been on the rise for a number of years and those on the far right have perpetuated hatred against Muslims. They should be called out for their hatred.

‘The days ahead will be difficult, but with unity and tolerance we will prevail. We will not allow these far right extremists to divide our diverse communities.

‘Enough is enough, my condolences and prayers for all the victims and their families. They are in my prayers.'

This video is pretty terribly translated in some parts, but I think it gives a pretty clear picture nonetheless. In some of the "unintelligible" parts the people say even worse things about the muslims than in those which are translated. A couple of them when asked: "Isn't that racist?" Respond "Yes. Yes, it is."

I think the most interesting comments come from the man responding at 4:30~

-"What do you think about the opening of another mosque?"
- "Burn it. ... They are not inclusive so neither am I. If they were more tolerant, I would be more tolerant."

It's clear that people who live in the same neighbourhoods of these immigrant muslim communities, and not behind some gated community or in the city centre, are getting extremely fed up with the situation. They are no longer afraid of being called racist, even in front of the camera of a big news network. These people have seen their neighbourhood completely transformed. They've seen a radical transformation, to borrow from Obummer.

Look at the imam's eyes at 2:40 ... would you trust a person that looks like that?

That old lady... afraid of walking out of her home! The young woman, openly calling them disgusting on television. "Yes. I am bit racist." She says.

The main theme of the video was clear: this neighbourbood is no longer italian. This isn't part of Italy anymore.

.... Theresa May is gutless, part of The Filth. Remember it was she who banned Pam Geller from entering Britain. An Islamofilth suicide bombing of Parliament would be win-win. Human Britons must now demand mass deportations.

This follows earlier analysis by the Muslim Council of Britain which identified 16 constituencies where the impact of Muslim communities could be “high”. In these seats, the swing in the majority towards Labour was 7,789 on average (equivalent to c.16% of the electorate vs. c.2% national swing). Every one of these 16 seats is now held by the Labour party:

11 previously Labour seats: the Labour vote was strengthened in every seat
5 previously Conservative seats: Labour gained every seat from the Conservatives

In the 23 constituencies where the MCB determined the impact of Muslim communities as “medium”, the swing in the majority towards Labour (or the Liberal Democrats in the Conservative-Lib Dem marginal Kingston & Surbiton) was 6,839 on average (c. 15% of the electorate vs. c.2% national swing):

16 previously Labour seats: the Labour vote was strengthened in every seat except for Bolton North East
7 previously Conservative seats:
In 5 seats, the margin of victory was decreased but remained Conservative (swing to Labour)
In 1 seat, the Liberal Democrats gained from the Conservatives
In 1 seat, the Conservatives increased their majority in Bolton West by 135

Harun Khan, Secretary General of the MCB said: “There is no block Muslim vote, nor can we know how Muslims have voted. What we can see, however, is Muslim and BME communities, in particular the young, enthused and involved in the political process across the country. In the 39 constituencies where Muslim communities could have had an impact, it appears they have done so.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Note that according Brook and Binswanger, Muslim immigrants are making the UK a better place.

That Texas sheriff from Lindsay discusses Islam as it really is. "Convert or die" is the Muslims' philosophy. Why is it most Objectivists don't get this obvious point? Why all the talk about "radicals," "extremists," and Islamists?" The enemy is normal Islam and Muslims.

This is the real way moderate Muslims can win respect and differentiate themselves from the sick dogs that blow people up. If moderates are afraid to speak out then that's fair enough, but courage means taking risks for what's right. So moderates - have courage! Because the world doesn't ultimately survive with it.

Note, the guy who said the quran does not promote 'killing innocent people' probably does not, himself, consider infidels to be innocent!

Tracy Murphree
May 23 at 2:56pm · Sanger, TX, United States ·
Pay attention to what you see in Manchester England tonight. Pay attention to what is happening in Europe. This is what happens when you disarm your citizens. When you open your borders without the proper vetting. When you allow political correctness to dictate how you respond to an enemy that wants to kill you. When you allow these radicals to travel to Afghanistan and Iran and simply let them back in. When you give up your city's and your neighborhoods to a religious ideology that says you must convert or die. A ideology that treats women as property, kills gays and women and christians with complete impunity. The left tells us we must submit and accept these radical beliefs and bend over backwards to make sure we don't hurt anybody's feelings. The left wants to cater to the very group that would kill every group they claim to support. Folks this is an enemy hell bent on killing you. Committed to forcing you to convert or die. This enemy will strap bombs to their own body and blow themselves up killing children. I'm sick of it. You better wake up America. While you are distracted by the media and the crying of the left, Islamic Jihadist are among us and want to kill you. What will it take? This happening at a concert in Dallas or a school in Denton County? If we don't do something quick this country will die of political correctness and the fear that someone's feelings may be hurt. It may very well be too late for Europe.

Someone should tell President Trump: "Drive them out of America!" The problem isn't the Saudies and their philosophy. It's the Americans and their philosophy. Enough already with this PC MC anti-American philosophy of self-hatred and self-destruction. The Americans, British, Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, Israelis, etc. need to finally, and at long last, defend themselves. Yes, indeed: Drive them out!

One of the first things to disappear in the wake of a terrorist attack is humour. That’s one of the things they want. They want to make us afraid.

When we’re afraid, we don’t dare laugh in case it’s the wrong thing to do.

But laughing is one of the ways we show we’re okay, and that there can be a future beyond what has happened.

We aren’t going to beat Islamic terror only with tanks and bombs. We’re going to beat it with ideology. We’re going to beat it with laughter — by showing the people who live in countries ruled by dictators and thugs that they will not make us afraid.

By showing them that the West is best.

That’s how the Berlin Wall fell. People in East Germany knew that West Germany was better.

The freedoms enjoyed in this country, the best country, are, or should be the envy of the world. And when people are truly free, they laugh. They laugh about everything.

It’s often said that in order to find out who is in power, you have to find out who you’re not allowed to laugh about.

Today that’s feminists, Black Lives Matter and Islam. Those are the groups that will get you into trouble if you crack jokes about. You’ll have your newspaper column taken away. You’ll be banned from Twitter.

Of all these groups, Islam is the most inherently hilarious.

Their outfits are hilarious. Ridiculous. Is there anything more comically sinister than the sight of a herd of women swathed in black bedsheets?

Anything more unintentionally ironic about a religion that hates gays that gets its men in a room together 5 times a day to stick their asses in the air?

Is there anything more richly amusing than the crybully faux-victimhood of those who worry about “islamophobia” and hijab-pulling in the wake of terror attacks that leave dozens dead?

Is there — and perhaps this is just my gallows humour — anything more darkly funny than a religion so thin-skinned that cartoons designed to provoke it give rise to deadly shootings, as though to prove the point of those French cartoonists?

Is there anything more preposterous than the phrase “The Religion of Peace”?

Islam is really funny.

But it’s also sinister. And as a gay man, I really don’t like it very much.

It’s easy to bleat about Christianity. It’s low-hanging fruit. It’s more difficult, and it takes more bravery, to criticise Islam with sincerity and seriousness. And with jokes.

They have no problem owning up. I remember Ashraf Choudhary when he was in parliament saying that death for apostasy was fine for an Islamic country, along with death for homosexuality and adultery, but not in New Zealand because it isn't an Islamic country. That should have ended his parliamentary career there and then, but it didn't.

Of the 27 taken in, two have already raped Japanese women. These people are savages from a savage culture. They should be shamed worldwide by kicking them out everywhere and locking them into the confines of their historic lands. We should not be importing them or fighting to improve their home countries.

The Objectivist position on this is one of their most retarded (and unlikeable) stances.

It's getting hard to keep up with these attacks. There was one reported yesterday in Germany, but I'm not sure if the story referred to a previous attack.

Mr. Brook: You said that the problem isn't caused by immigration but by bad foreign/military policy. Well, Poland doesn't have Islamic terror attakcs. What aspects of its foreign policy with respect to the Islamic world do you think are causing such a low rate of Jihadist attacks?

How much of this will Europeans take? Listen to Molyneux describe the type of Muslim torture that the Leftist media is deliberately covering up:

This is our enemy, both of them: the Left and Islam.

And yet, go to any Ortho or Orgoist website or Twitter feed and what will you find? "Left boot, right boot", "Trump is fascist", "don't blame immigrants blame collectivism", bla, bla, bla.

Really, its getting to the point where I can see people of good will turning to some authoritarian right wing political movement. Muslims are killing pregnant women in the streets and Leftist politicians want to import more of them.

If group A has an average IQ of 100 and group B has an average IQ of 85 they will produce different cultures. You've got to be a pomowonker not to realize that.

That's "pomowanker," not "pomowonker." You've got to be a pomowanker not to realise that.

Actually, I'm wondering why NIOF should be so difficult for dummies to grasp. These days, it's the so-called intelligentsia who don't seem to get it.

I once got into terrible trouble for saying that it takes a brain to appreciate Rachmaninoff. That's the truth of it. No gathering of Rach fans will ever be stupid ... or violent. Non-whites often get, and perform, Rach. More than can be said for OrgOism, when you think about it.

...is a rabid rationalist on this (and other) subjects. He is incapable of ever coming into contact with reality in this area. To him a war against immigration is a war against the entire system of liberty. He's unwilling to see anything else. That *is* blind ideology. And that is what Conservatives mean when they say that "ideology" is inherently destructive (and leftist).

The irony is that the type of open immigration Brook advocates would destroy America and Europe; the two areas on the planet even remotely capable of establishing the "individualist utopia" he envisions.

If it wasn't for Jihad, there would be no concern, but because there is, it comes down to self-preservation and the right to self-defense.

But Jihad is central to Islam. There is *no* Islam without Jihad. Islam is a perpetual solicitation to commit war. There can never be a peace between the Islamic world and the infidel. The only way for peace is for Islam to change internally and cease being truly Islamic. I can't imagine that happening in any timeframe less than centuries.

So if you truly value self-defense then that means recognizing Islam as the mortal enemy of the European world (and the entirety of anti-Muslim humanity) and Muslims as the transportation medium of that disease. Neither can be allowed in a society that avows to love liberty. The way you stated things is too soft; the softest I've seen from you come to think of it.

That is open to anyone, no matter what colour they are, to fight for, achieve, and then defend.

When I look at the world, the freest places are those with high IQ people. The hellholes are full of low IQ people. With an average IQ in the low and mid 90s you get countries with some 1st world areas but 3rd world ghettos (that make the country in total an unpleasant place especially if you are not upper class) . Whether or not Randian style liberty can be transferred to all the races on earth remains to be seen. Hell, it remains to be seen if whites themselves will not totally abandon liberty for Leftism. I see no future timeline in which racial genetics does not become important.

Charles Murray (of The Bell Curve Fame) said recently that within 3 years we'll know one way or another whether racial differences in intelligence have a genetic basis. (Actually he said w/in 3 years we will know they do.)

If group A has an average IQ of 100 and group B has an average IQ of 85 they will produce different cultures. You've got to be a pomowonker not to realize that.

Without a shadow of a doubt, the future will consist of whites and blacks living, working, playing, and loving together in perfect harmony. They will ruthlessly exploit each other's strengths and weaknesses, interacting and meshing in pure peace and cooperation. So too men and women, straights and gays, young and old, artists and engineers, etc. And all will uphold and promote liberal philosophy and politics with ease.

So too with Neanderthals, if they get revived, and Martians, if they get discovered. Once an intelligent species is taught reason, individualism, and freedom, virtually all social problems are close to instantly resolved. That's not pollyanna -- that's reality.

There are civilised blacks and uncivilised whites. Lotsa the latter within OrgOism, lauding headbanging and all the rest of multiculturalism. White OrgOists are bigger enemies than civilised blacks like Leontyne Price. How can these "alt-right" types not see that? I'm now all for apartheid: one side based on brains and meritocracy, quarantining all trash—the other, the trash, consisting significantly, inevitably, of Muslims.

Islam can be banned because we are at war. If it wasn't for Jihad, there would be no concern, but because there is, it comes down to self-preservation and the right to self-defence.

"I would say that if liberty is to have a future, it will not be the race blind"

All that is needed is people who value liberty who are capable of seeing that it is, in Rands definition, a value to be achieved and then defended. That is open to anyone, no matter what colour they are, to fight for, achieve, and then defend.

It is a selfish thing, but so many Libertarians, I think, approach it altruistically.

I know, Kryel, but I struggle with this idea that genetics has something to do with culture and morality. I could see a potential link between intelligence and genetics, but culture and morality doesn't wash with me. It is the realm of ideas, not genes. And how much intelligence is actually needed to understand the moral idea that it is wrong to mug or rape someone? Not much I don't think.

Richard -- I was talking about whites as a group -- not individual whites. Not you. Everyone is different. Different whites have different individual characteristics, both good and bad and neutral. I'm a radical Individualist. I'm fully aware that each person is different from every other person. That's how I always judge and treat them.

If you want the minarchist night watchman state then you can not allow Islam within your borders. Islam can not be conceived of as just a religion or ideological phenomenon. It is many things simultaneously, all of them bad. It is a political ideology, a totalitarian legal system, a tactical war movement, a land grab for despotic elites, a Machiavellian subversive psy-ops campaign, a degenerate sexual cult that perpetuates systematic pedophilia, and all of this conducted by a dangerous and culturally alien 5th column (that today unbelievably is considered a "victim group" by the left because they are not white and not Christian). Islam needs to be banned from Western Nations and anyone with connections to Islamic culture *even if they are not Muslim* needs to be prohibited from entry. The policy should be "Separationism"; ie total separation from Islam and its peoples (combined with quarantining Muslims inside their historic lands).

If the Objectivist movement understood that and advocated that even with all the other blank slate bullshit they believe in, I would feel that the movement was fundamentally valuable and had merit (and maybe a future). But O'ism is in denial of Islamo-realism and openly argues for the opposite set of policies thinking that devastating war against a few countries while allowing Islam itself to exist within the West is the solution (the Rear Admiral Yawon Bwook war strategy).

Racial hereditarianism and how it affects liberty politics is a much harder subject. I think banning Islam can be legitimately argued under Rand's paradigm. But arguing for racial or ethno-nationalist based demographics is much harder (and is probably outside the parameters of Rand's thought no matter how skillfully stretched with upgraded knowledge).

Personally I do think that certain races can be considered inherently dangerous and treated the same way as a dangerous ideological phenomenon like Islam (Africans for certain). But I haven't worked out how and I doubt I ever will. I am not a philosopher. But if I had to bet on the future, I would say that if liberty is to have a future, it will not be the race blind ("race doesn't matter all that matters is individuals, bla, bla, bla,") individualism you see with libertarians and Objectivists today. Genetics *will* eventually be factored into the liberty equation. But I also feel that this will occur with time as it becomes both observationally and biologically understood that multi-racial societies are unsustainable.

I know that's a dark position to hold but that's where I'm at. And as I see fewer and fewer whites relative to blacks, browns and beiges, I become more convinced American multi-racialism is doomed.

As Doug bravely notes two comments above, there's a powerful argument to be made, based on current evidence, that blacks, Hispanics, and Arabs are naturally, significantly more immoral, criminal, and animalistic than whites. Also that whites are naturally, significantly more immoral, criminal, and animalistic than east Asians and Jews. But these hypotheses wildy violate almost-universal notions of democracy, equality, and egalitarianism. So evasion and fraud on these pivotal issues are rife.

This is a good video (only 14 min) on the differences b/w Islam and Christianity using the Seven Deadly Sins of Christianity vs The Seven Sins that doom a person to Hell of Islam. You see that Christianity's sins are borrowed from Greek philosophy, namely the Stoics and that they all can be expressions of a desire to improve moral character (there is alot of that in Christianity). But when you look at Islam's sins you see that they are designed as control over people and the defense of Islam as such. Also, the speaker makes a great point at the end that Islam is inherently *more collectivist* than Christianity because it has an in-group / out-group dichotomy built right into its core. There is a dual morality in Islam that there is not in Christianity. Form Muslims, non-Muslims are owed no moral concern.

And yet Objectivists think that all religions are equally as "epistemologically flawed" and that Muslims should be allowed in the country if they are not "Islamists". The non-Objectivist world is capable of making solid arguments that O'ists with their Randian epistemology can't. Depressing.

Yes but an important point is that even without Islam, Middle Eastern and North African and Black African immigrants would be dangerous anyway. They are lower IQ and higher crime prone; much higher. The estimates of rapists as percentages of total population in African nations is very high. There would be problems with these people even without Islam. With Islam this population becomes nightmarish.

Look at the destruction that blacks and Mestizos have done to America without Islam. You can blame welfare statism all you want but the reality is that even with the same crappy welfare state system, if America were an all white country it would be a utopia compared to what it is today.

Black and brown people are dangerous because of the culture they bring with them which is related to their group biology. Equatorial region people are a problem everywhere. It goes beyond just Islam.

Navigation

More SOLO Store

Syndicate

The opinions expressed here are the unmoderated views of the contributors who express them.They do not necessarily reflect the views of other contributors, or of SOLO, and do not necessarily align with Objectivism.