Question: Should it be legal for campaigning politicians to tase to the point of loss of bodily functions anybody who physically attacks them? Newt might have won over some voters if he’d have dropped this clown.

Comments

206629 Responseshttp%3A%2F%2Fdougpowers.com%2F2011%2F05%2F18%2Fglitters-gold-newt%2FAll+That+Glitters+is+Not+Gold+for+Newt+Gingrich2011-05-18+14%3A11%3A34Doug+Powershttp%3A%2F%2Fdougpowers.com%2F%3Fp%3D20662 to “All That Glitters is Not Gold for Newt Gingrich”

Marshall_Will on
May 18th, 2011 12:52 pm

Not funny. How was NG or anyone else present supposed to know what was in this @$$clown's bag o' tricks? Anthrax? Electric eels?

The GLBT 'community' needs to renounce this type of behavior. Making a 'point' ( or more likely trolling for crazy @zz b_ _t s*x from all the youtube hits? ) I can see the Craigslist ad already.

"Yes, 'this' is Chad. Uh huh, I'm the one that dissed that homophobe Newt. Wasn't that the sexiest thing you ever saw when that bear of a security guard GRABBED my junk and whisked me from the room! Drinks..? Eight o' clock at the Mineshaft? Don't make me wait!"

Yep, I don't like Newt, but I support the right to tase people who think assault is a viable form of protest. Anything could have been in that box. Where was security before that guy got so close? They should be fired.

VaGal on
May 18th, 2011 1:20 pm

Oh, what's a little unicorn dust while you display your own intolerance in the name of tolerance? A good tasing is the least these people deserve. As Marshall_Will notes, we do not know the extent of the physical threat they may actually pose.