Breaking News

CIA chief admits use of brutal interrogation techniques

CIA has learned many lessons from this new chapter in its history. In a rare televised press conference at Langley, the CIA Chief acknowledged that torture techniques used by some of his officers made matter of terrorism worse and provided “a breeding ground for more terrorism”.

Some officers of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) used brutal techniques on terrorist suspects and there was no proof of useful information yielded from the interrogation, the chief of the US spy agency has said.
John Brennan, in a rare televised press conference held at the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, Thursday acknowledged “unauthorised” and “abhorrent” practices by some officers, saying it was “unknowable” whether the so-called enhanced interrogation techniques produced key intelligence, Xinhua reported.

“We fell short when it came to holding some officers accountable for their mistakes,” Brennan said, adding that the use of coercive methods has a strong prospect for resulting in false information because “if somebody is being subjected to a course of techniques, they say something to have those techniques stopped”.

“And so there have been a lot of studies done over the years about the value of different types of interrogation methods and whether or not coercive methods can lead to useful information that couldn’t otherwise be obtained,” the CIA chief noted.

But Brennan asserted the CIA “did a lot of things right” in a time when there were no easy answers, saying CIA officers were acting under Bush administration guidance that harsh techniques were legal.

The CIA was brought to sharper focus following the release Tuesday of a Senate Intelligence Committee report, in which details were offered about the agency’s brutal interrogation methods over the years after the Sep 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the US mainland.

Among the methods were water-boarding, sexual threats and sleep deprivation, though the report found the techniques largely ineffective and poorly managed.

The revelations have sparked outrage and demands for justice around the world.

Juan Mendez, the UN’s special rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, said the use of torture when interrogating prisoners captured in the US “war on terror” has damaged the country’s moral high ground and set back the global fight against the condemnable practice.

“The example set by the United States on the use of torture has been a big drawback in the fight against such practice in many other countries throughout the world,” he said.

“We have lost a little bit of the moral high ground,” Mendez added. “But it can be regained and it should be regained.”

He said the torture programmes had made the matter of terrorism worse and provided “a breeding ground for more terrorism”.

“As a nation that has publicly affirmed its belief that respect for truth advances respect for the rule of law, and as a nation that frequently calls for transparency and accountability in other countries, the United States must rise to meet the standards it has set both for itself and for others,” Mendez said. (IANS)

Related Posts

Petitioners’ village in Beijing is a den of injustice and inhumanity where petitioners or their relatives are imprisoned, arbitrarily detained or beaten by official and their hired thugs just to buy their silence. In several cases, police have simply arrested people for applying for a protest permit. Many end up in China’s notorious reeducation through labor (laodong jiaoyang or laojiao) system.

Mercy or pardon is the last and final correcting fluid that can alter life and death, in any civilized and just society. Do those who decide a mercy petition have the option of being wrong, unfair or unjust? A right decision can undo or overwrite any error or oversight but what if the decision is wrong? Who suffers or pays for it? Do two wrongs make one right?

The outgoing Pentagon chief firmly believes that although Iraq and Afghanistan have some troubling similarities, they are two different situations. But in the end what matters is that each country must take the responsibility for its own future. And be the master of its own fait and destiny in governing itself…

Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an very long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t show up. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Regardless, just wanted to say wonderful blog!

Hey just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your post seem to be running off the screen in Chrome. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the issue resolved soon. Thanks

First of all I want to say awesome blog! I had a quick question that I’d like to ask if you don’t mind. I was curious to find out how you center yourself and clear your thoughts prior to writing. I have had a difficult time clearing my thoughts in getting my ideas out there. I truly do enjoy writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are generally wasted simply just trying to figure out how to begin. Any suggestions or tips? Many thanks!

Hello! I understand this is somewhat off-topic but I had to ask. Does operating a well-established website such as yours take a massive amount work? I am brand new to writing a blog but I do write in my diary on a daily basis. I’d like to start a blog so I can easily share my personal experience and thoughts online. Please let me know if you have any ideas or tips for brand new aspiring blog owners. Thankyou!

The very crux of your writing while appearing reasonable initially, did not settle perfectly with me personally after some time. Somewhere within the sentences you actually managed to make me a believer unfortunately only for a while. I still have a problem with your leaps in logic and one might do well to help fill in all those gaps. When you actually can accomplish that, I could certainly be fascinated.