The worst anti-Semites are Zionists who create anti-Semitism and use
it to dupe and coerce Jews into advancing the Illuminati bankers'
plan for world government dictatorship.

In the past, I have argued that Zionism is a protection racket
<http://www.savethemales.ca/000889.html> and conspiracy against
Jews. Today, I will suggest they have suppressed normal Jewish
cultural/spiritual expression and hijacked the Jewish people to
serve their perverted cause.

Before Zionists took over the US government, they took over the
American Jewish community and made it their instrument.

Henry Hurwitz's
<http://www.americanjewisharchives.org/aja/FindingAids/Hurwitz.htm>
"Menorah Journal" and Menorah Societies were an attempt by American
Jewry to see itself culturally and spiritually as an end in itself,
rather than a means to serve and support the "Jewish homeland."
Zionists suppressed this free and democratic group, in the same way
as they are depriving all Americans of their political and cultural
freedom.

THE MENORAH SOCIETY

Henry Hurwitz started the first Menorah Society at Harvard
University in 1906 and "The Menorah Journal" in 1915. The Menorah
movement stood "for the study and advancement of Jewish culture and
ideals in America." By the end of the First World War, the movement
had expanded to include the Intercollegiate Menorah Association,
Summer School, Education Conference and Board of Lecturers.

Essentially the movement fostered non-dogmatic non-political study
of Jewish history, spirit and culture. It was open to different
points of view and initially received support from the central
bankers. But when Hurwitz insisted that Judaism had nothing to do
with Zionism, and Jews ought to feel perfectly at home in America,
the bankers froze the Menorah movement's charitable funding.

In 1958, Hurwitz wrote a friend, "We have had more than one coy
proposal from this and that wealthy organization to take us over.
Our financial problems would then be 'solved.'And our freedom—that
is, our true life—dissolved." (Menuhin, The Decadence of Judaism in
Our Time, 1965. p.366)

In the Autumn-Winter 1959 issue of the "Menorah Journal," Hurwitz
describes the effect of "bigotry" i.e. Zionist banker control of
organized Jewry.

"This bigotry strikes beyond one old established independent
organization and its magazine, which have perhaps rendered some
service to Judaism through more than half a century. This bigotry
poisons the air of Jewish communal life in America. It tries to
suppress...the basic American principles of free speech and free
press. It penalizes honest analysis [of those] who control the
Jewish public tax-exempt philanthropic funds, and hence have the
power to enrich favorite organizations, while starving others that
do not bend the knees...Thus, they actually hinder here a rational
long-view consideration of the best interests of the people of
Israel themselves.

"Moreover, as is well known, a very large proportion of the
supposedly voluntary philanthropic donations are extracted from
business and professional men on threats of punitive economic and
social sanctions. This must be described as what it is—a species of
terrorism. Such terrorism has become a most effective technique in
large Jewish fund raising." (Menuhin, p. 367)

Unfortunately the Menorah movement died with its founder in 1961.
Its work was partly continued by the American Council for Judaism
<http://www.acjna.org/acjna/Default.aspx> , under its dynamic
founder Rabbi Elmer Berger (1908-1996.) In 1965, Moshe Menuhin
characterized American Jewish life in the following terms:

"Today in America, Jewish culture and even Jewish religion has
degenerated into 'Jewish' nationalism, and Jewish philanthropists,
Jewish schools, Jewish segregated services, have been all subverted
(with a few noble exceptions) into serving...the up building of the
'Jewish homeland'...(468)

(A measure of this: Moshe Menuhin had to self-publish his book.)

CONSEQUENCES

My guess is that American Jewry is about evenly divided
<http://www.henrymakow.com/001383.html> : half is alienated from
all things Jewish; half is under the control of organized Jewry,
i.e. the central banking cartel. This cartel, synonymous with the
name Rothschild, is behind all major wars
<http://www.savethemales.ca/001936.html> and depressions of the
past 300 years, behind Communism, Fascism and the Holocaust, behind
9-11 and the bogus war on terror. Nothing in this world happens
without money and they control government credit.

They need to enslave us to protect this world monopoly. Their goal
is to remake mankind into a slave race by destroying the basis of
our humanity: nationhood, religion (God), race and family.

This enemy sits at the heart of our political, financial and
cultural life. It has co-opted all groups in the same way as it has
co-opted Jews. However, organized Jewry is leading the assault on
our freedom. The Masonic B'nai Brith
<http://www.savethemales.ca/001211.html> is behind the "hate
speech" legislation and Bill S 1959
<http://www.rense.com/general79/rduh.htm> which would treat
their political opponents as if they were "anti-Semites" and
"terrorists."

The bankers are the real terrorists. They organized 9-11 using the
secret services and they are behind "Al Queda." They may be planning
another world war
<http://www.savethemales.ca/000546.html> starting with a
conflagration between Israel and Iran.

They are also the real anti-Semites. They have sacrificed Jews to
their agenda before (Communism, Nazism, Zionism) and will do so
again. All Jews will be blamed for the New World Order, even though
half are indifferent, and the other half are willing dupes.

While I was writing this article, I got an email from a reader who
said he had just given a Jewish friend "Hell."

"I don't know if this means anything but I'm tired of feeling
powerless to all these bastards and if I can make them eat some of
their own shit...good. I also told him that Jews aren't stupid and
if we had quit giving money to Israel 30 yrs ago there may be peace
over there.."

It's time that Jews realized that anti-Semitism is caused by the
bankers' megalomanical agenda and is used to implicate and blame
ordinary Jews. The bankers hate real Jews and real Judaism. They
would never have created Israel if it were just a "Jewish homeland."
It is their private fiefdom, army and nuclear arsenal, part of their
agenda for world government and world war. Jews are just pawns in
their game.

“Some things of interest, perhaps. Is there blame to assess over the
failed war in Iraq? Is this futile and destructive struggle the
fault of a mentally defective President, egged on by a vicious and
unbalance Vice President?

The recent revelation by the U.S. intelligence community that Iran,
often put forward by Bush and Cheney as planning to attack everyone
with atomic bombs, has been revealed to be utterly false. In spite
of these revelations, Bush continues to mumble and rant about his
determination to attack Iran. There is an interesting, and
frightening, background to all of this non-stop lying and it is not
the weak character of George Bush or the manic viciousness of Dick
Cheney.

The Pentagon has long been outraged at the piecemeal destruction of
both the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps in the meat grinder that
Iraq has become. They know who the real culprits are because they
have identified them and been reading their top secret messages for
two years now.

Are they listening to the White House? No, they are watching Israel
like a hawk, reading their top secret diplomatic and military
traffic, getting reports almost daily from U.S. intelligence
personnel stationed in Israel and they have long ago extended their
surveillance to the Israeli diplomatic messaging.

From this, they have built up a massive dossier that shows very
clearly that the driving force behind the Iraq invasion and now, the
frenzy to attack Iran is purely Israeli.

That country has so subverted our official institutions with money
as the carrot and attacks by their almost complete control of the
American print and television media as the stick. Israel has used
the neo-cons to put forward Israel’s needs to Bush…who listens
raptly and obeys without question.

They hated Saddam Hussein because he dared to fire rockets into
Israel during the Gulf War and they suggested that if American
forces destroyed their enemy, we could all share in the revenues
from Iraqi oil. That this plan collapsed is certain but most
Americans do not know that the so-called “Yellowcake uranium” story
upon which Bush based his war was a pure Israeli invention.

Now, with even the possibility that Iran might be working on an
atomic bomb, a bomb which would certainly be used against Israel,
that country has doubled and redoubled its clandestine efforts to
push America into pulling their chestnuts out of the Mideast fire.

Israel, according to intercepted conversations by the Pentagon (and
now circulating in Washington) is prepared to fight to the last
American life. And those who mourn the young American dead and
mangled soldiers in Iraq do not need to look at the manic and
deluded White House but to Tel Aviv who killed and maimed their
sons, brothers, fathers and husbands.

In a very true sense, the leaking of the report on the halt in the
Iranian atomic development program was a form of very high level
mutiny on the part of Bush’s military high command. This was not any
kind of an error but a deliberate and hopefully successful, plan to
force the United States away from blind obedience to Israel’s
murderous wishes.

Bush made no objections when the Israeli government told him they
were going to flatten Beirut and they quickly resupplied the IDF
with more cluster bombs whose sole purpose was to kill civilians.
When Hezbollah struck back, rocketing sacred Israel and doing
terrible damage to the IDF, Israel demanded that Bush send American
troops to help them kill more Arabs. Bush could not because, thanks
to Israeli demands, our troops were pinned down in a vicious
guerrilla war in Iraq. Now, we see that Israel is livid with rage
because of the revelations of the American intelligence community
and are bending every effort to get their co-religionists in America
to continue to demand American military action against Iran.

In the long view, it would be better if we threw out the neocons,
most of whom are Israeli citizens, stopped all military aid to that
instigator of death and destruction, disbanded the AIPAC
organization, and warned the American media that this is the United
States, not Israel, and that there are times when silence is
golden.

All of this manipulation is becoming very obvious, even to the
chronically disinterested American public and if you stop up the
spout of a boiling tea kettle, the lid always blows off.”

As the twenty-one
month long siege of Gaza becomes a death sentence for yet more
civilians, a group in the UK with experience of the Occupied
Territories is urging the Committee on Standards in Public Life to
examine whether there is undue Israeli influence at the heart of
British government.

The blockade stops vital medical supplies going in and prevents
chronically sick patients (including children) transferring to
proper hospital treatment outside Gaza. Israel’s deep penetration of
our political system, says the group, is preventing Britain from
taking a principled stand on Middle East matters, including the long
catalogue of grotesque violations of Palestinian human rights, of
which the Gaza siege is only the latest example. Conservative
Friends of Israel, for example, claim the support of 80 percent of
Tory MPs.

On 30 November 2007, Francesco Cossiga, former president of Italy,
told the respected Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera that the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned and realized by
the CIA and Mossad. He is stating the obvious.I have always said
that the intelligence agencies of the leading nations of the world
are certainly very well aware that the official version is a fraud.
The largest media networks are also aware of the 9-11 hoax,
primarily because of their fundamental role in perpetrating this
fraud on the public. The people are always the last to know the
truth.

President Francesco Cossiga

The following is a translation of what President Cossiga said:

From circles around Palazzo Chigi, nerve centre of direction of
Italian intelligence, it is noted that the non-authenticity of the
video is testified from the fact that Osama bin Laden in it
'confessed' that Al Qaeda would have been the author of the attack
of the 11 September on the Twin Towers in New York, while all of the
democratic circles of America and of Europe, in the front lines
being those of the Italian centre-left, now know well that the
disastrous attack was planned and realized by the American CIA and
Mossad with the help of the Zionist world to put under accusation
the Arabic Countries and to persuade the Western powers to intervene
in Iraq and Afghanistan.
For this, no word of solidarity arrived to Silvio Berlusconi, who
has been the author of the brilliant falsification, neither from the
Quirinale, nor from Palazzo Chigi, nor from representatives of the
centre-left!

Cossiga had expressed his doubts about 9/11, and is quoted in
Webster Tarpley’s book:

The mastermind of the attack must have been a “sophisticated mind,
provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but
also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be
accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security
personnel.

How
Anti-Iraq-War Jews Licensed
Neoconservatism

Ever
since the rise of the neocons,
my liberal Democratic mother and
I have had the same argument. I
say, "They're Jews, and they're
representing Jewish political
aims." She says, "No they're
not. They're a bunch of
rightwing nuts. You keep talking
about the Jewish support for the
Iraq war; every Jew I know was
against it."

I've
never had a very articulate
answer for my mother. Till I
read James Petras's
wonderful piece on an AJC
poll that makes her point--most
American Jews opposed the Iraq
war and oppose an attack on
Iran...

One reason for the gap
between the ‘progressive’
polling results and the
actual pro-war behavior of
the major American Jewish
Organizations is found in
several of the opinions not
cited by progressive
analysts but emphasized by
the 52 leaders of the major
communal organizations (Daily
Alert, December 13, 2007).
Over eighty percent (82%) of
American Jews agree that
‘the goal of the Arabs is
not the return of occupied
territories but rather the
destruction of Israel’. Only
12% of Jews disagree. And
55% to 37% do not believe
Israel and its Arab
neighbors will settle their
differences and live in
peace. On the key issue of a
compromise on the key issue
of Jerusalem, by 58% to 36%
American Jews reject an
Israeli compromise to insure
a framework for permanent
peace. Given
the high salience of being
pro-Israel for the majority
of American Jews and the
fact that the source of
their identity stems more
from their loyalty to Israel
than to the Talmud or
religious myths and rituals,
then it is clear that both
the ‘progressive,
majority of Jews and the
reactionary minority who
head up all the major
American Jewish
organizations have a
fundamental point of
agreement and convergence:
Support and identity with
Israel and its anti-Arab
prejudices, its expansion
and the dispossession of
Palestine. [my
emphasis] This overriding
convergence allows the
reactionary Presidents of
the Major Jewish
Organizations in America to
speak for the Jewish
community with virtually no
opposition from the
progressive majority either
within or without their
organizations. By raising
the Israeli flag, repeating
clichés about the
‘existential threat’ to
Israel at each and every
convenient moment, the
majority of Jews have bowed
their heads and acquiesced
or, worst, subordinated
their other ‘progressive’
opinions to actively backing
the leaders ‘identity’ with
Israel. Their franchise on
being the recognized Jewish
spokespeople intimidates
and/or forces progressive
Jews to publicly abide to
the line that ‘Israel (sic)
knows what is best for
Israel’ and by extension for
all American Jews who
identify with Israel.

Petras
has just about nailed it. The
crazy rightwingers are actually
speaking in the name of
progressive Jews. These
rightwingers aren't fringies.
They are supported. They
dominate the leadership of
Jewish organizations and as I
have noted here before, gained
support for the Iraq war from an
overwhelming majority of
anti-Vietnam-war Jewish
Democratic congressmen. The Jane
Harman type. Which is to say
that neoconservatism has been
licensed by the larger Jewish
community, because secretly or
unconsciously that community
feels that these guys are
standing up for Israel. The
neocons are the tough
brother-in-law.

When
will we disown him? I keep
waiting for the Jewish
soulsearching over what neocon
Jewish ideas about Arabs have
done to the Middle East, Jewish
identity, and America. But
progressive Jews won't lead that
soulsearching until they
acknowledge their own agency in
the mess. Until they accept that
Jerusalem doesn't belong to the
Jews. 58% to 36% against
dividing Jerusalem! My god. No
wonder Camp David fell apart
over that issue...

"The result is that Members of
Congress today loudly reward
Israel as it violates
international law and peace
agreements, lures America into
costly wars, and subjects
millions of Palestinians under
its rule to apartheid-like
conditions because they are not
Jewish."

"In years past, conservatives
were often shouted down on
university campuses by left-wing
students. But today speakers
disapproved by powerful interest
groups are simply disinvited in
advance. Even Harvard University
has fallen to the new
censorship. On September 14,
2007, the Harvard Crimson
reported that the Israel Lobby
was able to force Harvard
University to disinvite three
speakers, an Oxford University
professor, a DePaul professor,
and a Rutgers professor, because
they had criticized Israeli
policy."

"A number of writers have
exposed Israel’s misbehavior and
the power of the Lobby, but
until now, the Lobby has been
able to marginalize its critics
by smearing them as “anti-semites,”
“nazis,” and “Jew-haters.” In a
new book, John J. Mearsheimer
and Stephen M. Walt have broken
the Israel Lobby’s power to
suppress truth by demonizing and
intimidating all who would
criticize Israel."

"I think it is the best thing
and you should be proud that the
Zionist media, inside the United
States, are against you. The
more they are trying to attack
you, the more is because you are
at a better position. Do not be
afraid of people who speak
openly of attacks, you should
rather be afraid of those who
speak nice to you. No one in the
world had expected the Islamic
Republic to make such
achievements. The Iranian people
are far too clever to fall into
such propaganda, and I think
they are clever enough to
realize that this propaganda is
the exact reason to stand
firmly, and they do not expect
to receive cheers from the evil.
...

"All the media is silent about
all the crimes committed by the
Zionist regime by using the
Holocaust concept."

TEHRAN (Fars News Agency)- Seven
chancellors and presidents of
Iranian universities and
research centers, in a letter
addressed to their counterpart
in the US Colombia University,
denounced Lee Bollinger's
insulting words against the
Iranian nation and president and
invited him to provide responses
for 10 questions of the Iranian
academicians and intellectuals.

There are
features to Zionism that are seldom discussed. Often when they are
discussed the language is needlessly convoluted and intricate. It’s
understandable; people who want to make their point are going to
spend a lot of time on detail. I’ve yet to see the most important
features of Zionism discussed in a simple ABC manner.

It is easy for anyone curious enough to want to do so to look into
what Theodor Herzl, the founder of Zionism, had to say. You can read
Ben Gurion and you can read about the position taken by Zionist
leaders during World War Two when many efforts were underway to
remove Jews from Germany and the occupied regions. These aren’t
secret documents. A very clear picture is painted.

The events of World War 2 were a tremendous boon to Zionism. This
isn’t me saying this. This has been repeated often by Zionists and
evidence of their activity during World War 2 is easily found… often
on the front page of mainstream newspapers. Incidents such as their
declaration of war against Hitler early on; March 24, 1933 it
appeared in the London Daily Express. And the behavior of Zionist
afterwards is also not a secret

“There is a huge amount of literature describing how the Zionists
made it very difficult to save Jews during and after World War II.
As various individuals and organizations were trying to arrange
departures of Jews to western countries, the Zionists worked
overtime to prevent this from happening. They expressed the opinion
that building up the Jewish population of Palestine was more
important than enabling Jews to go to third countries, and they
insisted to western powers that Jews should not be accepted anywhere
other than Palestine. Indeed, Yitzchak Greenbaum, a famous Zionist,
proclaimed that “one cow in Palestine was worth more than all the
Jews in Poland.” The infamous David Ben-Gurion said in 1938:

"If I knew it was possible to save all the children in Germany by
taking them to England, and only half of the children by taking them
to Eretz Israel, I would choose the second solution. For we must
take into account not only the lives of these children but also the
history of the people of Israel."

There’s much worse, such as their blockade of Red Cross aid to the
camps which the authorities were most willing to allow. Zionists
kept all aid from reaching these people with the sole intent of
increasing the condition of their suffering. This is known and
documented … a real fact. This is all public record but that’s not
the concern of this article

Theodor Herzl came up with the idea of using anti-Semitism as a tool
to achieve certain ends. He said it should even be manufactured when
there is opportunity and used whenever possible, true or not.
Whatever it took to get what he wanted was fine.

Zionism is a pretty simple thing if you strip away all of the
scenery. It’s about possession of the Holy Land exclusively for the
Jews and about expanding the dimensions of it to include what they
have interpreted from some Biblical map they have that implies that
a truly enormous stretch of real estate belongs to them. This area
is far larger than the presently ‘expanded’ borders that exist
today. The only other feature of Zionism that needs to be understood
is the use of anti-Semitism which is employed against anyone who
opposes the hegemonic intentions of Zionism. It doesn’t matter if
the person opposing Zionism is actually anti-Semitic or not. They
automatically become anti-Semitic by virtue of their opposition. It
is permissible to do ‘anything’ to further the purposes of Zionism;
“by deception ye shall wage war.”

Let’s not get into the Ashkenazi question or anybody’s rights to
exist. Let’s avoid all distraction and red herrings and go right to
the point. The Zionists are to the Jewish people what the Nazi’s
were to the German people. After the defeat of Germany the German
people were all branded as Nazis and that is not the case. All Jews
are not Zionists either.

Zionist behavior causes reactions because it is an ugly thing that
no human being could countenance as far as its behavior and rhetoric
goes. However, when you rightfully criticize Zionism you are tagged
as criticizing Jews. As a result, Zionism has been able to become a
world problem because they use the Jewish people as a human shield.
You launch a comment and it is made to appear to hit collateral
bystanders. That’s the intent.

It would benefit anyone interested in the truth of the matter to
read about The True Torah Jews and look into the works of Rabbi
Weissmandl and Grand Rebbe Teitelbaum; if you are interested of
course. If you’re not then that’s up to you.

World Jewry and Zionism is not the same thing and commentary on one
doesn’t impact on the other. Let us use an analogy. Republican
conservatives and American neo-cons are not the same thing. The
latter may be Republicans but they are their own reality. They may
operate within the wider spectrum of conservative Republicanism but
their direction and intention are not the same and they neither
serve nor advance the interests of Republican conservatives any more
than politically motivated religious fundamentalists serve or
advance the interests of Christians.

This is like a virus in that it pretends to be a legitimate cell but
the virus is not the cell that it is mimicking. It’s a blind. The
people who are going to pay the heaviest price for the actions of
Zionism are not the Zionists. The Jewish people and others are going
to pay the price and it is imperative that the Jewish people make an
effort, which so far has not been generally forthcoming, to
disassociate themselves from Zionism.

Many Jews have become convinced that the actions of Zionists are key
to the survival of Israel. This is a lie. They are the biggest
threat to the survival of Israel. If it weren’t for Zionism, Israel
would already have peace with her neighbors just as the Jews who
lived there previous to their arrival did. It is the intention of
Zionism to steal the lands of other people and that sets other
people against them. That’s an observable fact.

There is a reason that the Zionists ruthlessly suppress everyone who
criticizes them. There is a reason they use anti-Semitism against
everyone who speaks out against them. There is a reason they set up
a hue and cry against research into and publication about the truth
concerning them. The reason is that they are up to no good. What
other reason could there be? If you don’t care what people see then
you don’t hide it. If you do care then you do hide it. There’s a
difference between making love to your wife with the door closed and
raping a child behind the same door. There are limits to the defense
of privacy just as there is a natural abhorrence against anyone
revising history to suit their purposes.

The Zionists are extremely powerful. The Nazi’s were very powerful
once too. They aren’t anymore and the same has to happen to the
Zionist movement.

This slander of everyone who criticizes Zionist activity has to
stop. It has to be unmasked for what it is. When the Rachel Corrie
play is suppressed in every country where there is an attempt to
have it performed it should tell you something. When Walt and
Mearsheimer are hounded and slandered wherever they appear it should
tell you something. When historical events are routinely doctored to
serve specific interests it should tell you something. When a
majority of the recent anti-Semitic attacks in France were proven to
have been engineered by Zionists it should tell you something. When
it is revealed that members of AIPAC were caught sending classified
material to Israel it should tell you something. When a war is
manufactured under false pretenses engineered by Zionists …and
American soldiers and foreign citizens die and the reputation of
America is tarnished it should tell you something. When new
drumbeats for war against Iran are being sounded by the same people
that drummed up the Iraqi conflict it should tell you something. But
are you paying attention? Are you listening?

I don’t suppose I would be as concerned as I am if it were not for
the fact that real people are dying for lies fabricated by people
who engineer and manipulate the conflicts. I wouldn’t be as
concerned if an entire nation weren’t being used for target practice
and abused daily across the stretch of decades. I realize that until
it happens to you it doesn’t really matter. I don’t have that
luxury, my conscience won’t allow it.

We have to separate the Zionist movement from the ordinary lives and
goals of Jews the world over and see the difference; the same way we
can see the difference between the Khmer Rouge and the Cambodian
people, the Communist government and the Russian people, the Chinese
government and the Chinese people, the American neo-cons and the
American people, Nazi Germany and the German people.

This slander of truth tellers and blackmailing of nations has to
stop. The association of anti-Semitism with genuine criticism has to
stop. Sooner or later the wrong people are going to pay the price as
they always do. It’s up to the Jewish people to begin to police
themselves. The greatest power to do so lies with them. The world
will thank you.

“Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do
not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame
you because geography books no longer exist, not only do the books
not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in
the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz
Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushu'a in the place of
Tal al-Shuman. There is not one single place built in this country
that did not have a former Arab population.” (Moishe Dayan)
…Genocide…

What kind of a god would establish a nation
on terror? A god who is as evil as the devil.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18906.htm
I have for some time now publicly articulated my sympathy and
support for the state of Israel, even
while criticizing those cases that I believed constituted poor
judgment and bad policy. My stance was based upon my past
experiences with Israel, which
began indirectly in 1990-1991 when I was involved in counter-SCUD
activities during Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm, and
continued in a much more direct fashion as a weapons inspector with
the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM), charged with
disarming Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.

As a weapons inspector I made numerous visits to
Israelfor the
purpose of coordinating with the Israeli intelligence community on
matters pertaining to Iraqi WMD. I was greatly impressed not only
with the professionalism of the Israeli intelligence services, but
also with the Israeli people and society. During my time in
Israel, I was
witness to numerous horrific events, including several terrorist
bombings and the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. The
resilience of the people of Israelin
absorbing these blows yet continuing to live life to its fullest was
remarkable, and worthy of admiration.

As a firsthand witness to the remarkable vigor of the Israeli state
and its people, and as someone who considers himself to be their
friend, it saddens me to see just how poorly the current Israeli
government returns this friendship, not to me personally, but to my
country, the United States of America. The government of Prime
Minister Ehud Olmert has embarked on policies that are questionable
at best when one examines them from a purely Israeli standpoint;
they are nothing less than a betrayal of the
United Stateswhen
examined from a broader perspective.

The insidious manner in which the current Israeli government has
manipulated the domestic political machinery of the
United Statesto
produce support for its policies constitutes nothing less than
direct interference in the governance of a sovereign state. The
degree to which the current Israeli government has succeeded in this
regard can be tracked not only by the words and actions of the
administration of President George W. Bush and the American
Congress, but also by the extent to which a pro-Israel lexicon has
taken hold within the mainstream media of the
United States. Witness
the pro-Israel bias displayed when discussing the situation in
southern Lebanon, the air
strike in Syria, or the
Iranian situation, and the retarding of any effort toward a
responsible discussion of anything dealing with
Israelbecomes
apparent.

One would expect such efforts to shape the domestic public opinion
of a state deemed hostile, but when the target of these Israeli
actions is its ostensible best friend, one must begin to question
whether or not the friendship is a one-way street. And if this is
indeed the case, then perhaps it is time for the
United Statesto
reconsider its decades-old policy of strategic partnership with
Israel.

It must be understood that the government of Ehud Olmert is acting
in a post-9/11 environment, with considerable facilitators in the
administration of President Bush, including the vice president.
These two factors combine to create a cycle of enablement that
allows a purely Israeli point of view to dominate American policy.
If the Israeli point of view were built on logic, compassion, and
the rule of law, then this tilt would not constitute a problem. But
the Israeli point of view is increasingly constructed on a
foundation of intolerance and irresponsible unilateralism that
divorces the country from global norms. In this day and age of
nuclear nonproliferation, the undeclared nuclear arsenal of
Israelstands as
perhaps the most egregious example of how an Israel-only standard
destabilizes the Middle East. It is
the Israeli nuclear weapons program, including its strategic
delivery systems, that is the core of instability for this very
volatile region.

The statements by Israeli officials concerning the recent National
Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iranand its
nuclear program are perhaps the best manifestation of this reality.
Avi Dichter, Israel's public security minister, has condemned the
NIE as a flawed document, and in terms that link the American
analysis to a cause-and-effect cycle that could lead the Middle East
down the path of regional war. Like many Israelis, including the
prime minister, Dichter disagrees with the American NIE on
Iran, in
particular the finding that Iranceased
its nuclear weapons program in 2003. The Israelis hold that this
program is still active, despite the fact that the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has reached a conclusion similar to the
NIE's based upon its own exhaustive inspection activities inside
Iranover the
past five years.

In threatening the world with war because
Americaopted for
once to embrace fact instead of fiction,
Israel, sadly,
has become like a cornered beast, lashing out at any and all it
perceives to threaten its security interests. The current Israeli
definition of what constitutes its security interests is so broad as
to preclude any difference of opinion. Israel's shameless
invocations of the Holocaust to defend its actions not only shames
the memory of those murdered over 60 years ago, but ironically
dilutes the impact of that memory by linking it with current
policies that are cruel and intolerant. The message of Holocaust
remembrance should be "never again," not just in terms of the
persecution of Jews, but in terms of man's inhumanity to man. The
birth of the Israeli state, as imperfect and controversial as it
was, served as a foundation for the pursuit of tolerance. However,
Israel's
current policies, rooted in ethnic and religious hatred, are the
antithesis of tolerance.

Israelat present can
have no friends, because Israeldoes not
know how to be a friend. Driven by xenophobic paranoia and
historical grievances, Israelis
embarked on a path that can only lead to death and destruction. This
is a path the United Statesshould
not tread. I have always taken the position that
Israelis a
friend of the United States and
that friends should always stand up for one another, even in
difficult times. I have also noted that, to quote a phrase well
known in America, friends
don't let friends drive drunk, and that for some time now
Israelhas been
drunk on arrogance and power. As a friend, I have believed the best
course of action for the United
Statesto take
would be that which helped remove the keys from the ignition of the
policy vehicle Israelis
steering toward the edge of the abyss. Now it seems our old friend
is holding a pistol to our head, demanding that we stop interfering
with the vehicle's operation and preventing us from getting out of
the car. This is not the action of a friend, and it can no longer be
tolerated.

It is time for what those who are familiar with dependency issues
would term an intervention. Like a child too long spoiled by an
inattentive parent, Israel has grown accustomed to American largess,
to the point that it is addicted to an American aid package that is
largely responsible for keeping the Israeli economy afloat. This aid
must be reconsidered in its entirety. The day of the free ride must
come to an end. The United Statesmust
redefine its national security priorities in the Middle
Eastand
position Israel
accordingly. At the very least, American aid must be linked to
Israeli behavior modification. The standards
Americaapplies
to other nations around the world when it comes to receiving aid
must likewise apply to Israel.

Let there be no doubt: Israeland its
considerable lobby of supporters here in
Americawill
scream bloody murder if their aid is trimmed in any fashion. But in
the greater interest of what will best benefit the security
interests of the United States, and
indeed the Middle Eastand the
entire world, the grip Israelhas on
American policymaking must come to an end. It is up to the American
people to make this change, first and foremost by recognizing that a
real problem exists in American-Israeli relations, then by electing
officials to Congress who will deal responsibly with these problems
based not on the behind-the-scenes lobbying of Israel and its
proxies, but rather the legitimate interests of the United States.

If Israeldecides
it wants to be our friend, then it will change its behavior
accordingly. Absent this, Americahas no
choice but to declare its independence from a relationship that has
destroyed our credibility around the world and drags us dangerously
down the path toward another irresponsible military misadventure in
the Middle East. If, in
the future, Israeldesires
to reestablish a relationship with the
United Statesbuilt
upon the principles of mutual trust and benefit, then so be it. Such
a relationship is something I could embrace without hesitation. But
one thing is certain: no such friendship can truly exist under the
conditions and terms that are in place today, and for that reason
the entirety of the American-Israeli relationship must be reexamined.

On Thursday afternoon, Gordon Brown learned that he was to become
only the second sitting British Prime Minister to be subject to a
police investigation.

This is happening less than six months after Tony Blair had left
Downing Street under the severe cloud of a police probe into the
Cash for Honours affair.

For Blair it was No 1 Labour fundraiser, the Zionist Lord Levy who
got him into serious trouble, for Brown it is Mr David Abrahams (in
the photo, Abrahams is on the right, with an MP friend), just
another 'Friend of Israel' and a provincial chairman of Jewish
Labour, who may be the one to finish off his political career.

Once again, the Labour Party had to admit that it erred by accepting
donations from dubious sources. ''The money was not lawfully
declared, so it will be returned,' said the Prime Minister, after
the disclosure that Labour had benefited to the tune of more than
GBP 600,000 from a bizarre funding scheme arranged by David
Abrahams, an eccentric property tycoon who decided to donate his
money by proxy.

Apparently, Lord Levy and David Abrahams were not alone in dragging
Labour towards yet another political disaster. The third corner in
this disastrous triangle is Mr Jon Mendelsohn, a man who grasps the
power of money and politics. Mr Mendelsohn, an ex-chairman of Labour
Friends of Israel
<http://www.lfi.org.uk/> , is the current chief fundraiser of
the Labour Party.

Seemingly and shamefully, the Labour Party did not learn its lesson
following the Lord Levy 'Cash for Honours' scandal. Once again they
let the supporters of Israel take care of their material needs.

I find myself wondering how come Labour is so heavily entangled with
those 'Friends of Israel'? However, the most crucial issue here is
actually the fact that not a single British media outlet dares to
ask the most important questions: what is this cabal of
self-declared 'Friends of Israel' trying to achieve by pouring money
into political parties? What is it that it is trying to buy? Where
is the money coming from? Is it their own money or is it delivered
by their 'friends' in the Israeli embassy or another Zionist
apparatus?

British society is a multicultural society, this means that very
many people of different ethnic and racial origins live together in
peace and mutual respect. This is probably the greatest asset that
the British culture can offer momentarily, a multi-ethnic society
made of communities of people who treat each other with respect and
tolerance. Many British Jews benefit and contribute to the British
multi-ethnic society. However, within the liberal multi-cultural
discourse it is 'politically incorrect' to associate ethnicity and
unlawful acts, something that our 'Friends of Israel' and 'Jewish
Labour' exploit beyond belief. Though they operate as an ethnic
lobby, promoting some radical, exclusive Jewish National interests,
they wouldn't like to be exposed as such, definitely not in
reference to their overwhelmingly disclosed unlawful activity.

A quick glance into the ideological fundaments the 'Labour Friend of
Israel' makes it clear that we are dealing here with some ardent
Zionist Neo-conservative worldviews
<http://www.lfi.org.uk/> : 'We are fundamentally sympathetic to
Israel's position as a liberal democracy facing constant security
dilemmas and existential threats'. For those who fail to understand:
Israel is indeed a democracy as long as you are Jewish. Within the
Israeli controlled territories, the vast majority of the
Palestinians are not even citizens. Strictly speaking, the 'Labour
Friends of Israel', fundamentally supports an apartheid racist
Jewish state i.e. Israel. If this is not bad enough, they do just
that at the heart of British politics. Moreover, they do just that
without even respecting the elementary British ethical political
norms.

Amid British multi-culturalism, no one in Britain dares question the
clear cabal of Zionists who were fully engaged in transforming
British politics into a Zionist internal affair. British press and
the media is fully aware of the complexity entangled with those
Friends of Israel and their fundamental sympathy, yet, they are
filling their mouths with water. Instead of standing up against this
dangerous lobby that acts to ally Britain with an apartheid state,
they use some sticky language, leaving the conclusions to the
readers, if they are able to make up their minds on their own. They
refer to Jon Mendlesohn's affiliation within the Labour Friends of
Israel, they refer to David Abrahams being a provincial
vice-chairman of the Jewish Labour Movement
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/11/30/nbrown330.xml>
.

I think that British media should be brave enough to stand up and
report that there is an Israeli lobby in Britain acting under the
name of Jewish Labour
<http://www.jlm.org.uk/cgi-bin/sitetools.cgi?task=servepage&id=1>
as well as Labour Friends of Israel. There is no German lobby in
Britain acting under the name 'Aryan Labour' operating as well as
'Friends of Germany'. Nor there is a Black Labour organisation also
lobbying as the Friends of Zimbabwe. Seemingly, Zionist lobbyists
are the only ones who get away with their unique form of racially
orientated lobbying activity.

Funnily enough, the only press outlet in Britain that was brave
enough to confront the severe implications of the current Jewish
affair was actually the leading British Jewish weekly, the JC
(Jewish Chronicle).

The JC does realise that the affair would eventually affect the
community. Seemingly, the JC does not doubt the truth behind the
current revelation. "The two main figures in this week's controversy
are Jon Mendelsohn, the Prime Minister's election campaign
fundraiser, and property magnate David Abrahams, who is accused of
breaking the law by using third parties to disguise donations of GBP
600,000 to Labour", said the JC.

Yet, being the leading Jewish press outlet and addressing mainly
British Jewish audience, the paper offers as well an 'Elder of Zion'
like pretext just to try to cheer its readers. There is a 'whiff of
antisemitism about it', says MP Andrew Dismore to the JC. "People
are looking for links to Jewish interests and evidence of a Jewish
conspiracy. The press are turning every stone to find one."

I find myself wondering how the JC can report some clear unlawful
conduct in one paragraph and then suggest a "Jewish conspiracy" in
the next. For those who do not realise, Abrahams and Mendelsohn are
not a hidden conspiracy, their acts have been exposed in broad
daylight, they are mainstream news on the front of each paper in
this country, subject to police scrutiny.

"The Hendon MP said he did not believe the case would have received
such intensive coverage if it did not involve Jews. The undercurrent
of antisemitism is worrying."

May I assure the ignoramus Hendon MP that an exposed cabal of Saudi
businessmen trying to buy a leading British party would get at least
as much attention.

Paul Usiskin, another Labour supporter and co-chair of Peace Now UK,
said: "It doesn't do the reputation of people communally linked to
Israel any good to find themselves willingly or unwillingly at the
centre of matters to do with politics and money."

Once again, I find myself bewildered, this Usiskin sees things
through, yet he himself involved in some Judeo- centric political
activity as a lobbyer for the Zionist Peace Now UK.

"I hope," adds Usiskin, "that in contrast to previous issues of this
kind, people do not link historical relations between Jews and
financial affairs."

And I find myself wondering again, why shouldn't they? In fact,
every British citizen in general and British Jews in particular must
reflect just about that because this is the crux of the issue.

Jon Benjamin, the Chief Executive of the notorious Board of
Deputies, the Jewish Lobby that recently tried to shatter the career
of the democratically elected Mayor of London, was there to say,
"there is wide concern in this story and clearly there is a
potential for it to turn against us. We have been there before."

For a change, I agree with Jon Benjamin. Indeed you had been there
before and more than once, yet somehow you never learn your lesson.

PS/ The Sunday Times had 24 pages on government chaos and each one
had a box mentioning the Zionist groups, as if they weren't quite
prepared to spell it out. Also forgot to tell you that on
Parliamentary question time last week, someone raised the fact that
"the Protocols of Zion" is being circulated in a London
Comprehensive and Brown said smartly "he'd DEAL with it
immediately."!!

Obama and the Obamakins

Praising Israel in
a speech about racism is like praising the history of White South
Africa in a speech about civil rights. Has the fact that Israel is a
Zionist state completely escaped the minds of all the Obamakins?