First i want to ask you, How did you determine this was a chinese missile? Lets just say it was 2 missiles. How can you say it was chinese? And to
all the people thinking the chinese sub popping up during american exercises was recent, Look again and you will see that it was a few years back.

And saying the united states says it wasnt theres is funny. Do you believe everything they tell you? Do you think the chinese would risk a global war
by shooting a missile in our airspace and not intend a target. You are saying it went back on track? Where did it go then. It had to land somewhere.

Or are you implying that the chinese shot it from our waters to a destination outside the u.s to make it look like we did it? Please enlighten me. I
am having a hard time conceiving this.

Originally posted by russ1969
Do you think the chinese would risk a global war by shooting a missile in our airspace and not intend a target. You are saying it went back on track?
Where did it go then. It had to land somewhere.

Or are you implying that the chinese shot it from our waters to a destination outside the u.s to make it look like we did it? Please enlighten me. I
am having a hard time conceiving this.

Yes, the Chinese are known to make warning shots
across the bow. Here's you a prime example
of where they have fired missiles before for a purpose.

Yes, I am ASSUMING this missile was launched from our coast
and fired back out to sea away from the population. Where it landed,
I have no idea. And I quote the Chinese did this because they have
done it before. They fit the profile !!!! See article link above.

Originally posted by NuclearPaul
It certainly does look like whatever caused the trail suddenly went sideways where your diagram says the explosion took place.

a pretty good similar scenario would be to
look at old youtube footage of the Patriot Missile
Batteries during the first Gulf War and see how
they shot down those scud missiles coming
from Saddam Hussein and you'll get a better
understanding of how the pic adds up to evidence.

Showing off their new weapons defense in their own country. Far from coming into our waters and doing it. here is a link that explains different.
www.dailymail.co.uk...

Further independent footage has now emerged showing that the ballistic missile theory is ridiculous. The cameraman who filmed the original footage
admits that he filmed it for a continuous 10 minutes. No ballistic missile is going to remain in sight for that length of time.

The airliner footage fits the exact flight path and time of Boeing 757 America West Flight 808. The video footage aired on TV was edited. The
independent footage shows that the contrail dissipates as the airliner approaches the coast. It then continues on an easterly heading as it transits
at 37,000 feet onto to Phoenix. A weather satellite has also detected the airliner contrail.

This is an example of how edited footage, filmed with high powered optics creating foreshortening, can fool. It is a simple case of perspective.

Your videos you posted clearly shows the speed of these missiles. nothing like the slow moving object we seen in the original so called missile. Did
you go to the link i posted? I know, i know. Your determined to make your theory work so forget any other possibility. All im saying is if you believe
the government in them telling you they didnt launch anything that day, Than you must believe them when they tell you it wasnt a missile at all.

Originally posted by russ1969
Your videos you posted clearly shows the speed of these missiles. nothing like the slow moving object we seen in the original so called missile.

2 things to note:

1) You cannot compare oranges to apples,
we do not know how far away those scuds were
in that video.

2) We also don't know how far away the missiles
in the LA video were either.

The closer you are to these missiles the faster
they look to you. At 35+ miles away, they look
really slow. But if you were following them in
a fighter jet, it would look totally different I'm
pretty sure.

Originally posted by russ1969
And if you think our military would miss there target and not shoot a second intercepting missile, You are sadly mistaken!

they may have, I'm pretty sure they would have.
But since the missile was going away from the camera
then the 2nd missile interceptor would be even harder
to see than the first one and waaaay farther away out
at sea as that was the direction the first missile was
headed. Plus we do not have video footage of that part.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.