Today we face a climate of ever increasing misdirection by popular media. This site, along with others, aims to reveal the reality of America and the loss of fact inherent to the over riding theme of our current political and social confusion: Purposeful deception.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

The Real Reason Why Police Cage Peaceful Protestors

With Occupy Wall Street protesters kettled on
the BrooklynBridge
this weekend, we look at how kettling was used on protesters during the London riots earlier this
year.

Across the western world,
the public is losing a battle for territory. In the UK, publically owned health care,
housing, welfare and education are being cut, broken up and sold off for
private profit by David Cameron's Conservative government with audacious speed.
This has a very physical manifestation-- in the suffocating of peaceful protest
through a technique that has become known as "kettling," in which
protestors are contained for five, seven or 10 hours without food, water,
toilets, or hope of release.

Kettling has become
synonymous with the enforcement of the Conservative government's radical
austerity and privatization program. In November and December 2010 a student
uprising in Britain larger
than that of May 1968 saw over 40,000 students take to the streets of London on four separate
occasions to protest against the government. They occupied countless university
buildings during this period, and linked up with the anti-cuts movement UK
Uncut (which I've written about for
AlterNet).

After those winter protests,
the movement spread on March 26 to incorporate a 500,000 strong day of demonstration
and action, and after a long summer beset by heavy policing and the set-backs
of the August riots, the protest movement is gearing up once again. A public
sector workers strike that could see as many as 4 million union members walking
out has been called for November 30, and with the start of new university and
school years, more large student protests have been planned for the autumn too.

The lessons from last year
are manifold and debatable, depending on your tactical point of view and
political affiliation, but one stands out, and I consider it unarguable: it is
the physical act of protest itself, the very presence of ordinary citizens on
the streets, which will radicalise, organise, and motivate the people of Great
Britain to bring down David Cameron's government. The invasion of and
occupation of the Conservative HQ, at Millbank tower in London, on November
10, 2010, was the first move in the fight back, both deeply symbolic and a
shock to both sides. 'This is just the beginning' was the slogan that day: what
happens on the streets of London (and Madrid, Rome, Athens, New York and San Francisco) in the
next few months will determine whether this movement has an effective ending.
What follows is adapted from my pamphlet-length ebookKettled
Youth, written and published in July 2011:

"Whose Streets? Our
Streets!" The New Politics of Public Space

There has been a psychic
revolution since the glass shattered at the Conservatives' Millbank
headquarters -- and the new reality has been a shock to everyone. On the
climactic final protest in
Parliament Square on 9 December, you could see teenagers testing the edges
of the kettle and feeling its barbed-wire edges, like animals caged for the
first time. Pinch me to see if I'm awake, they cry, and then run back, eyes
bulging with adrenaline -- I saw it after darkness fell that night, when
conviviality turned to intense anger: that same full-body blood-rush of fear
and excitement you get if you've been in a fight, or been mugged, or been in
any kind of physical confrontation. It affects you physiologically, your nerves
bristle and tingle, and you can't help but come back for more. Around 7 p.m.
protesters stopped battling the police lines on Whitehall and started throwing rocks through
the windows of the Supreme Court (who knew we even had one? I didn't, it was
just another faceless, stately pile of bricks before). Some people climbed up
and were close to breaking into the building, before the riot police stormed
into the 'contained' zone to chase them away with truncheons and riot shields.
The same happened with the Treasury, riot police desperately trying to keep the
double doors shut from the inside, as teenagers chanting 'We want our money
back!' used metal fences as battering rams.

Those kids on the
front-lines looked variously scared, angry, cold, laughing, fighting, hurting;
but they were all there: awake, and alive -- bashing into riot shields just to
check it was real. It was. Walking into the main quad at UCL during the
month-long winter occupation, among countless banners, signs, and messages of
support, I was confronted by one especially memorable slogan: 'THIS IS ACTUALLY
HAPPENING'.

The kettle is neoliberalism's
most apt strategic deployment -- and as a public order policing tactic, it is
as risky as its philosophical underpinning. The intent is to suffocate protest
with 'containment', to stifle the swarming dissemination of dissent,
territorialising with hard lines; but in fact it agitates and intensifies: it
pushes the dilettante protester into becoming a hard-liner, a kind of unwitting
agent provocateur.

The smashing of the glass in
Millbank tower marked the first shattering of capitalist realism, and the
forging of a new mind-phase for a generation of protesters. Its physicality saw
it dismissed as wanton vandalism -- made easier for the media by the dropping
of a fire extinguisher from the Millbank roof by one 18-year-old now serving 32
months in jail -- but it represented the much-needed re-emergence of young
people into the public sphere. The month that followed 10 November --
culminating in the WestminsterBridge kettle described
above -- saw a totally unexpected surge of political energy. With no warning,
there were three more major student protests, attended by hundreds of thousands
of young people: and in between, a non-stop flurry of debates, public meetings,
rallies, marches, occupations, and headline-grabbing viral actions against
tax-avoiders by the likes of UK Uncut and the University for Strategic
Optimism. Scores of university buildings have been occupied, as well as
Conservative Party HQ, several local town halls, government departments,
schools, banks and shops.

'THIS IS AN IDEOLOGY' said one
placard I saw on the Trade Union Congress-organised March for the Alternative
on 26 March 2011. It was just those four words - the 'ideology' in question is
not a written bullet-point manifesto, not yet, and the danger is it will never
become one: but for now, it's a vital affirmation of a world beyond the end of
history, and beyond capitalist realism. Until it calcifies into a propositional
political agenda, protest and dissent is the ideology. 'Don't call ME
post-ideological, like it's an insult, like we don't stand for anything' is the
message emerging from a generation far too young to even remember the Cold War.

This energy went on tactical
sabbatical for the Royal Wedding in May, the vast majority of protesters
choosing to sit it out for pragmatic reasons. Yet the wedding still saw
horrendous new levels of political policing, even with barely anything planned
by way of protest: including the arrest of a crying child for
holding a pen, the raiding of squats and vegetable co-ops ('BEWARE THE
ANARCHO-SYNDICALIST COURGETTE!') and the de facto internment of over 100 other
innocent citizens on the astonishing charge of 'conspiracy to cause a breach of
the peace'. As the royal family sang 'Jerusalem'
in Westminster Abbey, it was observed that were he alive today, its author, the
anarchist William Blake, would be in a prison cell for this same kind of
'pre-crime'. But that 'return to normality' that
the Athens protesters feared -- it's not happened yet, because the
cuts have barely even begun to be felt yet, and those people that took to the
streets have been changed, in both their heads, and their actions: returning
from central London's causeways to local actions, occupations, and campaigns,
looking for new methods and opportunities to fight back - this is still, just
the beginning.

I saw my colleague,
journalist Laurie Penny, speaking on an Education Activist Network panel in
March, comparing the internet's emancipatory potential to the seismic changes
that followed the creation of the printing press: 'It didn't just change power,
it changed people... the English vernacular Bible was a heretical decryption of
power.' There was, she went on, a link between the first newspapers, produced
in the English Civil War, and its culmination in the execution of Charles I --
the liberating spread of information catalysing spectacle into the most
absolute, insurrectionary kind of engagement. 'The audacity of the idea that
you can take a square and topple a dictator does amazing things to people's
heads,' she went on, with the kind of excitement I can recognise as someone who
has had that same transformation of the imagination '... the same way Wikileaks
did. Things are going to change in the next 20 to 40 years in a way we can't
predict - all we can do is be ready'.

It's appropriate that by far
the best art-work and propaganda to come out of the movement so far is by a
collective called the Deterritorial Support
Group -- it's a pun on the Territorial Support Group, the Metropolitan
Police's thuggish public order cops: in December's protests the TSG left one
demure, peaceful student needing three hours of emergency surgery for bleeding
to the brain. The divide is clear, and both physical and psychological. You are
territorial about public order disputes, and mark your lines with these toy
soldiers -- we, on the other hand, challenge this by being everywhere, all the
time. 'WE ARE EVERYWHERE' was one of the most potent slogans of the November
and December uprisings, as occupations skittled one on to another, town council
meetings were stormed by old ladies and sixth formers, and high street shops up
and down the country were shut down.

Turning a kettle into a
rebellious 'occupied space' is one thing, but an even better way of subverting
the tactic emerged on 30 November's student demonstration, in the exemplary
chaos of the cat-and-mouse protest. An unusually thick winter snowfall in
London gave the day a special feel from the outset, and, wary of more kettling
in response to the official, pre-announced route, tens of thousands of school
children and undergraduates alike made merry fools of the Metropolitan Police,
constantly darting down side streets in their hundreds, making sharp U-turns to
avoid looming police lines, splitting off like tributaries before rejoining the
main currents at iconic spots across the capital; from Oxford Street to St Paul's
Cathedral, from Liverpool Street to Buckingham Palace, we spanned the entire
centre of the city

It was a protest widely
known by its Twitter hashtag, #dayx2, and protesters were regularly on Twitter
and SMS, checking in with friends, new acquaintances, and the #solidarity and
#demo2010 tags, to find out where the police were. My abiding memory of the day
is standing on the Strand, and Hyde Park
Corner, and Charing Cross Road,
checking my phone and saying 'Nope, not that way, there's a kettle forming by
Bank, let's go and join that other march heading west.' The police kept trying
to kettle us, but each time failed to enclose more than a hundred or so
protesters, meaning there were others elsewhere they had to worry about -- it
was as if we turned them into the world's worst cadres of sheepdogs.

The whole day felt like
dissent as directed by Molière: you'd peek down narrow side streets and see
groups of protesters running the opposite way down a parallel street; or lose
the group you were with, stand there furrowing your brow over Twitter for a
minute, only to look up and see several thousand chanting youngsters marching
towards you. How'd that line go, about first time as tragedy, second time as
farce? Well let's not be too dismissive of farce, not least because it's more
effective than tragedy: we caused ten times as much disruption, and made ten
times as many people aware of our cause than if we'd marched straight into a
kettle. 'I just saw you march past my office window!' a friend texted me at one
point -- it was that kind of day.

At the head of one phalanx
of young people marching down Holborn, I found two boys in school uniforms
plotting their route, confidently directing the placard-waving foot traffic and
leading anti-government chants. Jack Gillespie, 14, and Chris Leonidou, 15, had
come from Latymer School, a 386-year-old state school in Edmonton, North
London. 'We got a three-hour Saturday detention after the last one.' Jack told
me, seemingly unconcerned by this fate. 'They said if we missed school for this
today we'd be excluded.' Didn't that worry him? I asked. 'I'd rather have one
day's exclusion than pay £9,000 a year,' Chris replied without hesitation.

Eventually, after several
hours of stamping our feet all over London, the rivers rejoined in Trafalgar
Square as night fell. Suddenly it was snowing again, much heavier than before.
'You can come in, but you're not getting out again,' the police explained to
late arrivals, as they put the lid on the kettle, closing ranks around
thousands of young protesters. Inside, fireworks and flares were set off, a
samba band played, helicopters buzzed overhead, bottles rained in on the police
lines, and somewhere in the distance sirens wailed. More than 100 of these
protesters had been arrested by the end of the night.

Felix Cohen, a friend who
worked on Fight
Back! with me, quoted Milan Kundera's Book of Laughter and
Forgetting in response to the new spirit of protest, describing a
scene of young protesters giddily dancing as a kind of prelude to their
inevitable clash with riot police: 'On the one side the police in the false
(imposed, decreed) unity of their ranks, on the other side the young people in
the real (sincere and organic) unity of their circle; on the one side the
police in the gloom of their ambush, on the other the young people in the joy
of their play.'

'We wanted to be talked
about,' Cohen wrote, of the cat-and-mouse protest, 'and someone was trying to
stop us, so how did we react? Not in the serious Marx/Lenin/Trotsky mode of
discussing what it meant as workers, nor even as self-consciously as the
situationists, but rather as though it was a game.' This happened to us
repeatedly on #dayx2: we would move along the streets of central London with
one group of protesters, giving thumbs up to passers-by, notice a column of
riot police lined up by the side of the road, sidle up to them sometimes, and
overhear their words to each other 'soft lines, soft lines' -- that means it's
okay, that means you can still slip through the police to freedom. But when a
kettle looked more likely we'd step out, or turn off down a side street,
looping back around, checking Twitter, looking for TSG vans -- and then,
running into other groups of under-30s, catch the glint in their eye, and just
know they were doing the same thing. Several times that day we found ourselves
on street corners with strangers, swapping info -- 'Yeah, my mate says there's
a kettle forming near St Paul's now, we were going to head down there but not
any more.'

'Ah what about Victoria?'
'Yeah, we were with a group near Victoria, they tried to kettle us there but we
got away.'

The inevitable consequence
of this is Sukey, a glorious bit of
zeitgeist technology which works as a hub for protesters' information -- you
text or tweet @Sukey to tell them what's happening on the ground -- then the
team at Sukey HQ aggregate and sift the details, advising in real time where
police lines are, and which way you should go to avoid them. The name, of
course, comes from the child's nursery rhyme: Polly put the kettle on -- but
Sukey took it off again.

'Shall we go and get
kettled? It'll be boring otherwise' one teenager said to his two mates as we
walked together along the Strand on #dayx2, looking for one of the protest
groups -- his friends weighed the pros and cons, whether they were adequately
prepared for it 'this time'. I'm inclined to think this was less a victim's
masochistic addiction to his own oppression, and more that a) he sought the
solidarity of the kettle, and b) he wanted to play. Imagine if you missed out
on all the action, how dreary and disappointing that would be -- echoing the Athens
protesters again, the worst eventuality of all would be a return to normality.

And it would be a return, a
regression -- to the way things were before Millbank, before that head-shift,
before that explosive entry into the political sphere. The revolutionary esprit
de corps that suffused the winter protests was spine-tingling for its novelty
-- it's that transformative moment when 'solidarity' ceases to just be a
Twitter hashtag, and becomes a tangible thing you can feel emanating from those
marching alongside you, and hear in the chants that chime so perfectly with
your own.

Kundera's description of
young protesters 'in the joy of their play' is worth repeating: the
denunciations of 'thuggery' from
politicians and the media are ridiculous misrepresentations, but there's no
denying that some protesters will have found pleasure in hurling a brick at a
bank window or a line of riot cops. Maybe those few who did so had a
sophisticated critique of the neoliberal agenda underpinning their actions,
maybe they didn't -- but all of them chose violence (such as it is) because it
was preferable to normality; a normality which deadens the senses, in which the
horizons are limited and the vista before it cast in shadow’

There was never any chance
of missing out on the action on 26 March 2011. Organised months ahead of time,
the TUC's 'March for the Alternative' may have seemed like a bewitchingly vague
name for the biggest trade union demonstration in decades, to the casual
observer. It wasn't the 'anti-cuts' 'anti-capitalism' or 'anti-Tory' march, but
perhaps that speaks to some new-found self-knowledge on the left-- this is not
anti, it's pro.

The so-called 'A to B march'
from Embankment to Hyde Park attracted derision from some anarchists and
students ('FSU For the Alternative' suggested some of the tongue-in-cheek
propaganda from the Deterritorial Support Group -- FSU being shorthand for Fuck
Shit Up), but all public demos are worth something. It's not true that the Iraq
war protests changed nothing; though they certainly failed to change enough.
But they tainted New Labour and Blair for ever, and arguably made it harder to,
say, invade Iran at the drop of a hat. And yet, the failure of the Iraq
protests to make Parliament even flinch, and the total vindication of the marchers
by history, cannot help but make the predictable, rigid geometry of A-B feel
insufficient: for those young, fit and angry enough to try something more
chaotic, anyway.

Reading a book about Russian
utopianism recently I came across a quotation from the Marquis de Custine: 'The
square and the chalk-line accord so well with the point of view of absolute
sovereigns that right angles become one of the attributes of a despotic
architecture'. It's a funny idea, but in a way, it speaks to why the rigid geometry
of protest under capitalist realism feels insufficient. Dissent is tolerated
and absorbed by an establishment that knows -- and helps to establish -- its
dimensions, and knows that it poses no threat. When MPs haughtily say that of
course they support the democratic right to protest, they mean the kind that
has absolutely no democratic impact. Iraq did far more damage to the
contemporary British impulse to protest than kettling has done: just the other
day, I told a friend who'd been on the Iraq demos about the anti-cuts protests.
'Why even bother?' she asked. 'Iraq was the biggest global protest in the
history of civilisation, and we were right then as well, but they paid
absolutely no attention'.

Among the slogans that were
chalked on the ground in Trafalgar Square on 26 March, one stood out. Along
with re-tooled situationist phrases like 'ANOTHER WORLD IS POSSIBLE',
contemporary concerns like 'WHERE'S ALL THE MONEY GONE?', and some cold hard
stats about the cuts, it was the phrase 'I MELT THE GLASS WITH MY FOREHEAD'
which caused me to recoil. It captures the psychic transformation this
generation has gone through: smashing through the glass at Millbank, struggling
through the hard lines of the kettle, and finally piercing capitalist realism's
façade: an aperture through which now flows the pent-up energy, imagination and
passion of a generation who will need to use all three, extensively.

Dan Hancox is a
London-based journalist working for the Guardian and others, the
editor of Fight Back!, and the author of Kettled Youth.

FAIR USE NOTICE:

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and so on. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Contact information

If you have an original article that contributes to the theme of this blog, please send to

This blog is for educational value only and neither represents nor advocates social or political dissension lest it be in a peaceful, intelligent manner through the legal rights granted to us by the U.S. Constitution.