Protection of older
adults from exploitation requires a careful balance. On the one hand is
the concern for individual autonomy; on the other hand, there is
increasing recognition of the potential for vulnerability to influence,
manipulation or outright fraud.

Pennsylvania is considering amendment of
its Older Adult Protective Services Act. Professor Pearson's written
testimony for hearings in December 2013 addresses measures to encourage
early reporting of suspicions of abuse by banks and other financial
institutions.

Further, to assist in early recovery, Professor Pearson
recommends adoption of a private right of action under the Act to
provide statutory grounds for recovery of money or other property, or
appropriate injunctive relief.

That to facilitate early reporting, Pennsylvania take additional measures to create an environment where banks and other financial institutions are more likely to report suspicions of financial abuse, and

That to facilitate early recovery, Pennsylvania create a private right of action under the Older Adult Protective Services Act (OAPSA), permitting the victim of exploitation (or the victim's legal representative) to allege statutory grounds against the perpetrator in order to seek recovery of money or other property, or other appropriate injunctive relief.

Her first recommendation mirrors one that I have advocated since 2007, and again referred last year to the Pennsylvania Bankers Association for consideration. Seven years ago, California first mandated financial institutions to report suspected financial abuse of an elder or a dependent adult.

In an effort to combat financial abuse, California law requires individuals in certain positions, who are known as mandated reporters, to report incidents that reasonably appear to constitute elder or dependent adult abuse. The reports are generally made to the local Adult Protective Services (APS) agency or to local law enforcement.

Effective January 1, 2007, officers and employees of financial institutions became mandated reporters of suspected financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult.

The [California] Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act defines "financial abuse" as occurring when a person or entity takes, hides, appropriates, or retains real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult for wrongful use and/or with the intent to defraud, or assists in doing so. * * *

I recall reading articles at that time about the initial opposition to that proposal, and the subsequent concerns during the phase-in period from financial institutions after Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the legislation on August 29, 2005.

Pursuant to a new California bill SB 718, mandated reporters of elder or dependent adult abuse, including banks, may submit mandatory reports through a confidential Internet reporting tool if the county or long-term care ombudsman implements such a system. * * *

If the initial report is made through this tool to APS or ombudsman, as applicable, rather than by telephone then the reporter is not required to follow up with a written report. This would represent a significant reduction in the reporting burden on all reporters. * * *

Maryland banks and credit unions are likely to be among the first to notice that an elderly customer is being financially exploited by a con artist or an unscrupulous relative.

So it makes sense that these institutions take part in an effort to protect older Marylanders from being ripped off. Thanks to a new state law, they will.

Starting in October, banks and credit unions here will be required to report suspected financial exploitation of Marylanders age 65 and up. They must convey their suspicions within 24 hours by phone to Adult Protective Services — part of the state's Department of Human Resources — or law enforcement and must follow up in writing. Financial institutions that fail to do so will face a penalty of as much as $5,000.

Financial institutions usually aren't keen on more regulation. But many are on board in this case, saying the mandate will raise awareness of a serious problem. * * *

The articles notes:

Many other states already have such a reporting mandate, and it's about time Maryland joined them. * * *

Around 20 states require the reporting of such cases, including California since 2007. By the end of 2010, California banks reported that more than 26,000 cases of potential elder abuse had been turned over to authorities.

However, I believe that the first priority is for Pennsylvania to join the states that have enacted statutes to mandate potential financial elder abuse reporting by financial institutions.

Such a law in Pennsylvania could be crafted as an amendment to the existing Older Adult Protective Services Act using statutory models from those other states. The effect, after implementation, would be to uncover much more financial elder abuse, earlier.

Such mandatory reporting by banks and financial institutions is workable, would have a substantial and immediate effect to reduce financial elder abuse, and therefore should be pursued by legislators in Pennsylvania.

PA EE&F LAW BLOG

To access the home page of (and many other postings on) the PA Elder, Estate & Fiduciary Law Blog, click here, or click the title bar & description at the top of this page. UPDATES at the end of postings add more current related material; and LABELS (listed below) characterize posts by subject matter.

PA REGISTERS OF WILLS WEBSITES

This list of PA Registers of Wills websites, by county, was compiled by Daniel B. Evans, Esq., of Philadelphia, PA. His complete online list of Registers of Wills includes addresses and links for fee schedules & forms, where posted.

CONTACT NOTICE

Unsolicited information communicated from a person to the author or to Serratelli, Schiffman & Brown, P.C., when an attorney-client relationship does not yet exist by mutual agreement, is not confidential or privileged. Also, such contact will not create a conflict of interest or bar representation of another.

Mutual agreement as to an attorney-client relationship does invoke confidentiality & privilege, among other ethical obligations.

Nothing on this Blog shall be considered legal advice or formal opinions. No reader is justified in relying upon the contents of this Blog, or upon any links contained in it, regarding personal matters. The author disclaims any liability related to a reader's unilateral use of such information.

More specifically, to the extent this Blog references any federal tax matters, such entries cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under law, according to IRS Circular 230.

If a reader requires legal advice or services, contact a qualified attorney licensed in the appropriate jurisdictions or forums to provide personal, confidential advice or representation. The author is licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and before some federal courts & agencies.

Any opinions expressed in this Blog are solely those of the author, and not those of Widener University School of Law, of Serratelli, Schiffman & Brown, P.C., or of any other organization with which the author is associated.

By supplying cross-links to websites of other persons or organizations, no endorsement is intended. Readers must always use due diligence and discretion when evaluating the veracity of any material found on the worldwide web, regardless of the referral source.

The contents of this Blog are subject to change without notice. Entries may contain -- or will contain due to the passage of time -- dated, inaccurate, or incomplete information on the subject matter.

Copied or cross-referenced materials on this Blog that were created by others are displayed under the federal "Fair Use Doctrine", with full recognition of any copyrights secured by others.

Any comments or objections about the use of materials on this Blog should be directed immediately to the author, together with reply contact information.