Sunday, June 11, 2017

PART
TWO will focus on the plight of the whistleblower targeted for
counterintelligence operations, specifically as related to the
society in which he lives.

As
in PART ONE, the information presented here is based on my own
personal/professional experience and investigations and may or may
not coincide with the experiences of others who have gone public as
expositors of government criminality and corruption.

I
do believe, however, that much of what I describe here will be
recognized as a pattern of behaviors among those with whom the Target
is associated, be they family, friends, colleagues, acquaintance.

By
far the hardest, most distressing, most frustrating, most
heartbreaking of situations, for me personally, has been, not the
operations run against me by the perpetrators (which I am trained to
deal with, horrible as they are, and of which I have written
extensively), but rather the way I have been treated by other
persons with whom I have interacted on a regular basis.

Among
some of the former intelligence professionals, friends and colleagues
I have known, we had a basic description of those whose lives had
been, in large measure, free from direct interactions with government
entities, especially in the military/ intelligence community. We
called them “regular people”. This was not meant to disparage
them in any way, it was simply a way to differentiate from those of
us (in the minority) whose lives had been seriously and negatively
affected by many years of government aggression against us: the
intrusions, surveillance, harassment, violations (of every kind
imaginable) in what amounts to full-blown political persecution.

For
the “regular person”, these outrages against an individual,
committed by the government, seem far-fetched, implausible, the stuff
of science fiction thrillers, spy novels, or worst of all, of
paranoid fantasies.

If
it hasn't happened to them personally, they may be skeptical, at
best; in the worst case scenario, they may dismiss the Target as
“paranoid” or “delusional”. In any case, most will not
understand, and few will make the effort even to try. Even when they
witness some of the strange events which seem to happen only when the
Target is in their proximity, they tend to view such an event as
“coincidence”, or attribute it to some mundane cause. “Oh,
don't worry, it was probably nothing.” But the Target knows
otherwise. It was certainly “something”, no doubt about it, and
not something good. We have learned, the hard way, not to believe in
coincidence.

So,
where does that leave the targeted whistleblower? It leaves him
isolated, and to a large degree, alienated from those from whom he
would otherwise have a reasonable expectation of support, and concern
for his general well-being.

THE
CODE OF SILENCE

Assuming
you are a “regular person” (no offense intended), consider this:
you may know someone, perhaps a relative, a friend, who was involved,
at some time in the past, with an intelligence agency, or a military
veteran. Have you noticed anything different about them? Have you
ever wondered why it is that they seem somewhat self-contained? That
they don't talk much about themselves, or their background? That if
you ask questions about their military/intelligence career, you get
vague answers, or that they seem discomfited about any discussion of
these issues?

It
is more the general rule, than the exception. There are a number of
factors which may be responsible for these character traits, one of
which is the code of silence. The Mafia (similar in its mindset to
CIA), calls it “omerta”. Consider the name, Cosa Nostra, which
means “our thing”. It is a brotherhood, a “family”, held
together with ties that bind, usually intergenerational. In like
manner, I have often thought of CIA as “superglue”. It seems
nearly impossible to get yourself unstuck. Even if you manage to
remove yourself, serious injuries/damages (one way or another) are a
given.

Anyone
ever involved (especially in covert operations) is indoctrinated with
the Code of Silence. Imagine how difficult it is, then, to break the
silence, to tell the full truth of what you have witnessed and
experienced.

You
may have been threatened (implicitly or explicitly) about what will
happen if you talk to anyone, what the consequences will be to you,
or those close to you. One example, this from CIA MK Ultra, is that
some of us were programmed, that if we were ever to remember things
which were “wiped” from memory (this, done by 'electronic
dissolution of memory', hypnotic controls, drugs) we would commit
suicide. Suicide programming is one of the most heinous offenses
imaginable against a person, and yet this was just one of the
standard methods used to maintain “security” and stop the black
operations from being exposed.

Psychological
(and psychiatric) abuses, routinely perpetrated against persons, are
no less devastating than physical abuses. But of course, there was no
lack of either in MK Ultra.

Add
to this the fact that a tremendous amount of disinformation has been
disseminated about the true nature of MK Ultra. Government operatives
and their shills have flooded the Internet with false information,
such as “Monarch”, which was not a CIA operation under MK Ultra.
Lurid tales of satanism and sex slaves are promoted by the
operatives, attested to by bogus “victims”, then parroted by
large groups of ignorant people.

Books
are written by criminals and charlatans, purporting to “expose”
the secret government operations, all the while, adding layer upon
layer of falsehoods. Some of these unscrupulous individuals are in
actuality MC handlers, who continue to perpetrate atrocities on the
very persons they claim they are helping, as “deprogrammers”, or
“Christian ministers”.

And
these predators are raking in the cash, making their bones on the
bones of authentic MK Ultra victims, some of whom later become
Targets, as legitimate whistleblowers.

This
assault on truth results in a dearth of accurate, factual information
available to the general public, including those who may have a
serious interest in these issues, perhaps because they know someone
who was involved, and they want to understand, but may give up in
frustration, unable to sort out all the conflicting information. All
this, by design. It is in the government's interest (but certainly
not in yours) to keep you in the dark, so the operations can continue
unabated.

The
truth about MK Ultra is that it was a CIA operation, designed to
create the “perfect spy”, during the Cold War era, using a
combination of abusive methods, including hypnotic controls, drugs
and psychotronic technology, to program the victims to do the bidding
of the government, with no concern whatsoever as to the horrific
damages, no respect for the victims' rights. Much of the programming
was “trauma based”, meaning -make no mistake- torture. And there
is absolutely NO EXCUSE for such atrocities and crimes against
persons.

The
majority of Targets, as addressed here, were not involved in MK
Ultra, but this operation certainly exemplifies the diabolical
mindset of the government, when it comes to how innocent people are
treated, exploited for an ungodly agenda.

One
last statement of fact: By far the great majority of “regular
people” whom I have ever encountered, when asked if they have ever
heard of CIA MK Ultra, have answered: No, what's that?

This
should give some idea of what a survivor of such an illegal,
unconstitutional, hideous government program faces, simply due to
mass ignorance.

POST
TRAUMATIC STRESS SYNDROME

Note
that I call PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) by its original
name, PTSS (post traumatic stress syndrome). The word “disorder”
has a very negative connotation, and misrepresents the actual nature
of the affliction. PTSS is not a “mental illness”, which is
what government-issue psychiatrists (and psychologists) want everyone
to believe.

I
find it necessary to address the issue of PTSS, since it factors in
large measure in the cases of persecuted Targets. In the old days,
combat veterans would call it “shell shock”, or “combat
fatigue”. With good reason.

PTSS
is an externally generated (exogenous) condition, meaning it is a
response (or reaction) to outside forces. Most commonly, it is a
violent, life-threatening event, or series of events. Some examples:
violent combat; rape; ongoing sexual abuse; physical assaults;
psychological abuse; imprisonment/captivity; an ever-present threat
of assault (physical or psychological) by a person (or persons) in
the immediate environment; torture (physical or psychological).

PTSS
is not merely a “mental” condition; it manifests physically in a
variety of symptoms. Among the combat vets I have known (including
those who are former intelligence professionals), I have observed a
range of chronic physical conditions, such as fibromyalgia, chronic
fatigue syndrome, allergies, severe neck/back pain. These chronic
illnesses most often come from physical injuries (service-related
and/or a result of post-service assaults), and are exacerbated by
PTSS, especially if untreated, and worsen over time. A range of
symptoms result from assaults with directed energy weaponry
(microwave, ELF, pulse beam, lasers), electro-magnetic anti-personnel
systems.

(DISCLAIMER:
These are my observations, from my own personal experience and
interviews with individuals. I am not a medical doctor and this is
not “medical advice”. My training, as related to the issues here,
is in psychoanalysis/counseling.)

And
in the cases of PTSS among military/intelligence veterans who have
been targeted for persecution, the traumatic stress is not just “post
traumatic”, but ongoing.

The
plot against the Target is in fact to generate and maintain longterm
extremes of stress (constant or intermittent), so he never has a
chance to recover from past traumas. I could call it the 'death by a
thousand cuts'; it doesn't happen all at once, it is a slow kill, and
therefore all the more physically and emotionally painful and
devastating.

The
responses by the Target to the constant threats hanging over him may
vary, depending on his fundamental nature. I must say that I don't
believe in “human nature”, as a generic condition, as so many of
those who call themselves “scientists”, “philosophers”,
“mental health professionals” (what a misnomer!), do. Different
individuals will respond in various ways, which can be unpredictable.
There is no cookbook formula, but it is possible to understand the
most likely outcomes for the individual suffering from PTSS. Note
that I use the word, “may”, rather than the more definitive
“will”.

-He
may be hyper-vigilant, in his efforts at self-protection, security,
safety, including for those under his protection.

-He
may startle easily, at sudden noises, or at the unexpected
appearance of another person.

-He
may have a low tolerance threshold for loud noise (including the
jarring rock/heavy metal which passes these days for “music”);
for bright lights, especially florescent, which generates a
disturbing frequency, to which certain individuals are
hyper-sensitive.

-He
may avoid large crowds of people, such as in a stadium, or outdoors,
from which he cannot easily exit.

-He
may avoid situations which involve group dynamics, feeling more
comfortable with individual relationships.

-He
may take great pains to avoid confrontations, and conflicts with
others who are aggressive; when possible, he will walk away, rather
than engage others in altercations.

-He
may feel the need for a greater degree of solitude than the “regular”
person, may become reclusive, especially when the levels of stress
become overwhelming.

All
things considered, there is nothing pathological about the Target's
behavior, as described above. He is not harming others; he is not
committing acts of aggression. He is simply attempting to survive, to
protect and defend himself against the aggression, which has become
the harsh reality of his life. In my view, this is a psychologically
healthy response to a hostile environment, which hangs over his head
like a dark cloud, following him wherever he goes, especially when
other people have little or no understanding of his plight.

DEALINGS
WITH THE SOCIETY OF REGULAR PEOPLE

In
PART ONE of this report I addressed the issue of the person of
conscience, and his reasons for standing up against government
corruption and criminality, which he has witnessed and experienced
firsthand. That he is a non-compromiser, surrounded by compromisers.

How
then, is he to deal with the “regular people” he meets, with whom
he interacts, some of whom are his family and friends? Usually, with
great difficulty.

(I
would be remiss if I did not make it clear that not all “regular
people” are compromisers, or that they don't have a conscience,
that simply is not true. The point is, most have allowed themselves
to be ruled by commonly accepted social standards, general
consensus, group think, conformity, rather than detaching themselves
from what they have been indoctrinated to believe (in the schools,
the workplace, by religious dogma, etc. etc.) and developing critical
thinking, spiritual and intellectual discernment, actually owning
their minds, thus breaking free from the herd mentality, and
determining their own standards, based on timeless, universal moral
absolutes.)

Firstly,
the society itself must be considered. It is now deemed “normal”
to be in constant contact with large numbers of people, be they
family and friends, acquaintance, co-workers or total strangers,
through the plethora of electronic technology/devices which are
omnipresent, ubiquitous, in your face, wherever you go.

(This
technology generates a miasma of electronic pollution/ radiation,
from which, in any densely populated area, it is not possible to
escape. This alone is a serious problem, for all forms of life.)

For
the great majority of people (especially of younger generations) this
is considered not only “normal”, but expected, even required. If
you don't participate, you will be swarmed by those pressuring you to
join the free-for-all, and greeted with suspicion or disapproval for
declining, even deemed “antisocial”.

Personal
privacy has become, for the most part, non-existent, and most people
seem to have no problem with that. The entire world has access to the
details of their daily lives, photos (or video) of their every trip
to the grocery store, the picnic at the park, waiting in the airport
lounge for a flight, even the romantic candlelight dinner with their
spouse.

(Where is the “romance”, with an audience of gawkers? I
cannot fathom how/why anyone would voluntarily put their privates
lives on display in such a manner.)

The
Almighty Cell Phone has become their “god”, as they stare, in
hypnotic awe, at THE SCREEN, their altar of worship.

In
the surveillance society, engineered via social conditioning and
propaganda, for just such a purpose, to expunge privacy and the
integrity of the individual, the people have become willing
accomplices, not just in surrendering their own privacy, but in
invading the privacy of others. And most don't give a second thought
to how wrongful that is, how utterly disrespectful, or the actual
cause behind it. Because, after all, they say, “Everybody does it”.
That has become their mantra, their all-encompassing excuse, and
their defense.

And
what about the person who exercises his right to opt out? What about
those of us who defend our right to privacy, our personal boundaries,
against all busybodies, snoops and snitches, foreign and domestic?

Speaking
strictly for myself, as someone who has been the Target of government
surveillance for an entire lifetime, as someone whose life has been
marred by monstrous intrusions, invasions of privacy, not just by the
government, but by their armies of minions and stooges, and even by
garden-variety busybodies, I will fiercely defend my UNALIENABLE
RIGHT TO PRIVACY until God sends the chariot to take me home.

I
have a prepaid cell phone (not in my name, no contract) which is used
only rarely, to receive calls by authorized persons only. The device
is turned off most of the time, but I carry it with me, in case of
emergency.

I
have never sent a text message on a cell phone, and if I receive
them, I ignore them and delete them without reading them. That is my
policy. Anyone who has my cell number knows better (or should) than
to send a text message.

I
will clearly tell them, I DO NOT USE text messages, so please respect
that and do not send them. If you want to reach me, call me and leave
a voicemail. What is the response I have heard, over and over? BUT,
it's easy to do, and more convenient. I can show you how, or you can
ask So-and-So to show you. They drag in irrelevant issues and third
parties, based on unwarranted assumptions.

It
is as if they have not even heard a word I've said, or maybe they
were just not listening. What is it, about the phrase, DO NOT USE,
they fail to understand?

I
am not required to explain my reasons to anyone, and yet they seem to
falsely assume that if they continue to pester me, I will finally
give in to the pressure. After all, Everybody does it.

Then,
in their continuing barrage, I will be told, BUT, you have to adapt,
you have to be flexible, this is the way things are done, you can't
keep living in the past, etc. etc...

So,
because I have decided that I will not take part in their frenzy of
instant, non-stop communications, where a person is always available
24/7, no matter the circumstances, under pressure to respond, where
there are no boundaries, no discretion, then, according to this
mindset, I am “living in the past”.

Sounds
good to me, at least in the past there was a modicum of peace and
quiet, where you could hear yourself think... but no, I am living in
the present, and have decided that I will not accept the standards of
this society, where anything goes, simply because “Everybody does
it”, “That's the way it is”, “You can't just refuse”.

I
do refuse. I refuse to be enslaved by a telephone, or e-mail (which I
rarely use), or by what other people think I “should be” doing,
or when and how I “should be” doing it, nor will I allow their
pushy behavior or their disapproval to determine my way of life.

If
they then decide they want no communications with me, so be it. I
can live with that; what I refuse to live with is absolute disrespect
for my privacy and personal boundaries.

I
can best describe a particular dilemma the Target finds himself
facing by using examples from my own experience. That being the
unwillingness of the regular person to acknowledge the factual
statements the Target makes, regarding what is happening in his life,
no matter how many times he repeats the same statements, no matter
how consistent he is in his declarations.

The
facts of his life, and his circumstances, are a direct result of
having been targeted, driven to dire poverty/financial destitution,
having his health ruined by assaults, exacerbated by lack of medical
care. Much of this may be beyond his control, unless he is
independently wealthy, has the resources necessary to place himself
in a stable environment, and/or has a support network of friends, and/or
family who make his well-being a priority. Otherwise, he is facing a
terrible situation alone, with little or no reliable support of any kind.

And
then, when he tries to explain all this to others, he is treated, not
with respect and compassion, but rather as a recalcitrant child, a
ne'er do well, a supplicant in need of advice or intervention, which
he has not asked for, nor needs. He knows what is happening to him,
and why, better than anyone else possibly could, with the possible
exception of the perpetrators -who are psychopaths, as demonstrated
by their hideous crimes against persons.

T
(TARGET): I am suffering sleep deprivation, due to assaults with
electronic weaponry (or other cause). Sleep deprivation causes
illness for me, so I must prioritize getting enough sleep, in order
to take care of my health, as best I can. So, I will be unable
to...(attend this gathering...do this chore...assist in this
project...fill in the blank...)

RP
(Regular Person): Oh, don't worry about that, it happens to everybody
now and then. Forget sleep deprivation! We really need you to (fill
in the blank...), or, You need to (fill in the blank...). You can't
just lie in bed all day, you know. Just set the alarm, and you'll be
fine.

T:
I am unable to drive in urban areas, on 4-lane highways, or in areas
where I don't know the roads, due to disability.

RP:
Well, it's really easy. All you need to do is get a map...here, I'll
draw one for you. You just make a left turn here, continue for 5
miles, and you will reach the destination. Besides, you really need
to learn your way around this area!

T:
I'm having some serious problems to which I need to attend, so I'm
letting you know in advance, so that you can make other arrangements
for (fill in the blank...) that don't involve me.

RP:
Well, I never! You need to put a smile on your face, and stop playing
the victim! We all have problems, you know.

T:
I'm in pain all the time, and to make things worse, I am unable to
afford the medical care I need.

RP:
Well, there are drugs for that, you know. And have you explored all
your options? You need to stop being so passive and be proactive!

(This,
from people who have the resources/health insurance to get what they
need, when they need it.)

T:
I was unable to pay the electric bill this month, and have received a
final disconnect notice, so unless I can scrape up the money somehow,
my power will shut off a week from now.

RP:
Well, you should have budgeted your money, so this wouldn't happen.
Here, let me draw up a budget plan for you, and you'll be all set.
How much do you pay for rent? Other bills? You may have to make
sacrifices, as we all do...

(This,
from someone who owns their home, takes regular vacations, travels
frequently for business/pleasure and who has never been left in the
dark when the power was shut off.)

T:
My car won't pass inspection, and I can't afford to make the repairs
I need. So I won't be driving for the forseeable future.

RP:
You really should have thought of this and taken care of the problem
before it came to this. What are you spending your money on, anyway?

T:
I cannot tolerate the heat, it exacerbates my chronic illness. I
can't afford air-conditioning, nor to repair the air-conditioning in
my car, so I won't be going anywhere until such time as I can find a
way to get relief.

RP:
It affects us all that way, everybody has the same problem. Just get
out there and do what you have to do. (This, from people who do have
the resources to get relief, who do have air-conditioning in their
homes and cars.)

And
now, a brief anecdote, which shows the attitude of just one of the
many regular persons of whom I speak. This one is truly chilling, at
least it was for me, in demonstrating the level of profound
ignorance, the lack of discernment, so prevalent, especially among
Americans who have been lulled into a sense of complacency, willfully
refusing to acknowledge evil for what it is.

Nearly
a quarter century ago, I had gone out to dinner with some friends,
after we had attended a talk by Terry Anderson, author of Den of
Lions: Memoirs of Seven Years (published 1993).

He
was held captive in a dark, filthy dungeon, one of the hostages taken
by Islamic terrorists.

"What
is it like to to exist for seven years in darkness and chains, not
knowing from one day to the next how much longer you will be a
prisoner? Or if you will be released from captivity the next day -or
killed?"

-from
book jacket of Den of Lions

There
were four of us at the table, one of whom was a woman best described
as a new age, secular humanist. We were discussing the lecture by
Terry Anderson. When I attempted to explain my viewpoint, based on
professional experience, I was rudely interrupted; and I could not
believe what I was hearing from this woman, regarding the hell Terry
Anderson somehow survived, through his courage and the triumph of his
spirit over the evil to which he was subjected.

As
just one of numerous atrocities, he was shackled to another captive,
and could not make a move on his own. She actually said, Well, just
think how being chained to another person, what an opportunity that
would be to learn to get along with others! How you could “evolve”
spiritually from such an experience!

Rather
than acknowledge the absolute evil of those who would, through their
slavish adherence to a totalitarian political system, which requires
jihad, death to the “infidel”, sharia law, the de facto slavery
of women, sexual abuse of children, the persecution and death of homosexuals,
the inherent savagery, the brutality of their crimes against innocent
people (and I have only scratched the surface), this woman,
apparently living in a fantasy world of new age “tolerance”,
smugly delivered these idiotic platitudes.

In
doing so, Mr. Anderson's ordeal was minimized, the horror of the
situation nullified and invalidated.

Don't
acknowledge the evil. Don't take a stand against it. Don't make it a
priority, once you know of these horrors, to try to do anything to
expose them, to fight, in whatever ways you are capable, to stop
them.

I'm
certain that this woman, an amateur actress, whose most pressing
problem was likely how often she could arrange her schedule between
lunches with her friends, for an appointment at the hair salon, could
not begin to imagine a reality in which torture, violence and tyranny
are the general rule. She had a comfortable home, was married to a
man who supported her financially. I'm also certain that any
“tolerance” for this brutal culture would evaporate in the blink
of an eye, were she ever to find herself with such an “opportunity”.

Talk
is cheap, especially when you don't speak from experience, when your
mind has been co-opted by demonic plotters whose agenda is to steal,
kill and destroy.

I
was interested in the lecture because I had been involved in certain
operations, after the Shah of Iran was deposed; more than that I am
not at liberty to say, except that I had access to information not
available to most others.

Hearing
such a survivor's story is always very painful for me, but I won't
turn away from it, no matter how much it hurts.

I
still have my autographed copy of Terry Anderson's book.

"To
Barbara,

God
bless,

Terry
Anderson"

I've
never had anything happen to me, no matter how bad it was, which
could even begin to compare to the brutality suffered by Terry
Anderson, or by certain others, some of whom I have known, some of
whom I have debriefed (from Soviet gulags, or Nazi concentration
camps), some of whom are my family and friends, and some whose books or interviews I've read or heard.

But
even so, the atrocities I have personally experienced and witnessed have made me
all the more determined to stand up against these evildoers wherever
I may find them, to pursue justice for myself and the other Targets
and victims, to lend what support I can.

I
have no way to estimate how many victims there are, in this country
alone, who have been targeted by the government for neutralization.
Whose lives are being destroyed, piece by piece, while others turn
away, unwilling to even acknowledge their plight.

So,
next time you encounter someone who has a true story to tell, a story
of monstrous evil perpetrated against him, who presents the facts,
using logical arguments, and who furnishes evidence, why not remove
your eyes from THE SCREEN, and listen to what he has to say.

Why
not consider the merits of his story, suspending judgment, and take
the time to research his evidence for yourself, rather than
dismissing him as “paranoid” or “delusional”.

Ask
yourself, what do you have to lose?

The
answer is simple: EVERYTHING.

Your
liberty, the sovereignty of your country, your God-given, unalienable
rights, as an individual, protected and guaranteed under the
Constitution, are they worth fighting for?

What
about the future of your precious children, your grandchildren?

Do
you want them living under any form of totalitarianism, the globalist
New World Order? The United Nations? Communism, socialism, fascism?
Sharia law?

All
of whom are plotting (separately and in diabolical collusion) to
destroy this nation, and enslave every man, woman and child.

For
all persons with a conscience, who stand on principle, who hold to
moral absolutes, rather than blindly following social conventions,
who respect and defend the unalienable rights of all others, the
answer is: