That seems to indicate to me that there are some pages missing. I doubt CNN is referring to the handful of redacted words.

And to my amateur eye, page 2 definitely looks like it starts in the middle of some previous, missing paragraph. The indentation seems too deep to be attached to the "We have not been able to corrorborate" paragraph which precedes it on page 1.

Furthermore, look at the page 2 paragraph "Nevertheless, the FBI information since that time indicates patterns..." Since which time period? Surely that line doesn't refer to the 1998 "Bin Laden wants to hijack an airliner" information that this paragraph is supposedly indented under. Read the end of page 1 and the beginning of page 2... it doesn't really seem to fit.

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.