Physical and Social Perceptions of the Neighbourhood and Youth Volunteerism: Canada’s Capital Region

Sean Pearce, Elizabeth Kristjansson

Abstract

Youth are embedded within various ecological systems that may impact their philanthropic behaviour. This study employed online data from a sample of undergraduate students and traced the various pathways through which neighbourhood perceptions (e.g., social cohesion, satisfaction with amenities) related to formal and informal volunteering intensities. Path analyses revealed that neighbourhood cohesion directly predicted formal and informal volunteer frequency; as well, it mediated the relationship between satisfaction with neighbourhood amenities and informal volunteerism. Neighbourhood cohesion was strongly associated with informal volunteer intensity, whereas satisfaction with neighbourhood attractiveness did not relate to any volunteer outcomes. Neighbourhood characteristics may be important drivers of youth volunteerism, and thus stakeholders, organizations, and individuals should consider the impact of the social environmental context on shaping youths’ helping behaviour.

Andersen, H. S. (2008). Why do residents want to leave deprived neighbourhoods? The importance of residents’ subjective evaluations of their neighbourhood and its reputation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 23(1), 79-101. doi: 10.1007/s10901-008-9109-x

Bowling, A., & Stafford, M. (2007). How do objective and subjective assessments of neighbourhood influence social and physical functioning in older age? Findings from a British survey of ageing. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 2533-2549. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.009

Braubach, M. (2007). Residential conditions and their impact on residential environment satisfaction and health: Results of the WHO large analysis and review of European housing and health status (LARES) study. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 30, 384-403. doi: 10.1504/IJEP.2007.014817

Bruhn, J. (2009). The concept of social cohesion. In J. Bruhn, The group effect (pp. 31-48). Boston, MA: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0364-8_2 Buckner, J. C. (1988). The development of an instrument to measure neighbourhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 771-791. doi: 10.1007/BF00930892

Carson, E. D. (1999). On defining and measuring volunteering in the United States and abroad. Law and Contemporary Problems, 64, 67-71. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1147&context=lcp

Dassopoulos, A., & Monnat, S. M. (2011). Do perceptions of social cohesion, social support, and social control mediate the effects of local community participation on neighbourhood satisfaction? Environment and Behaviour, 43, 546-565. doi:10.1177/0013916510366821

Dempsey, N. (2008). Does quality of the built environment affect social cohesion? Urban Design and Planning, 161, 105-114. doi: 10.1680/udap.2008.161.3.105

Looker, E. D. (2014). Supportive communities and a sense of belonging in rural and non-rural communities in Canada. The Journal of Rural and Community Development, 9, 163-180. Retrieved from http://journals.brandonu.ca/jrcd/article/view/1185/273

Oswald F., & Wahl, H.-W. (2005). Dimensions of the meaning of home in later life. In G. D. Rowles & H. Chaudhury (Eds.), Home and identity in late life - International perspectives (pp. 21-45). New York, NY: Springer.

Young, A. F., Russell, A., & Powers, J. R. (2004). The sense of belonging to a neighbourhood: can it be measured and is it related to health and well being in older women? Social Science & Medicine, 59, 2627–2637. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.001