What assumptions interfered in the critical thinking process of people like Albert Einstein, Helen Keller, or Saul Kripke?

Many thinkers in society have played various contributions through their creativity. Bill Gates, a self-made person from the USA, has contributed immensely in the software development industry. [ After initiating his company, Microsoft in 1975, he has relentlessly worked to make it a multinational firm. As a result, he has earned significant amounts of profits, which have enabled the company to

provide corporate social responsibly and numerous benefits to the employees. James Cone, an advocate of the black liberation theology, has contributed to the shaping of Christianity by discouraging the disparity that existed between the whites and the blacks. Daniel C. Dennett is a philosopher from America who has made multiple contributions in the field of psychology regarding biology and cognitive science. His contributions have been immense through support of the Brights association. Peter Singer is an Australian philosopher with specialization in applied ethics. His perspective of handling ethical matters on material, predilection, and functionality has contributed to the improvement of humanity. Jean-Paul Sartre was a French philosopher who contributed to the political activism and criticism. In this regard, he influenced sociology, critical studies, and literary education. Nelson Mandela was the former president of South Africa who despite his detainment during the struggle for independence never created any rift among the whites and the blacks. In addition, he advocated for reconciliation through the introduction of policies that mitigated poverty and inequality.
Albert Einstein, in his efforts of creativity in the field of physics, experienced multiple challenges. The assumptions he made while undertaking his role as a physicist entails the effects of war and pacifism. In this regard, he put a lot of effort to ensure that all his undertakings were peace oriented and affected people’s life positively. Due to the fear of the anticipated dictatorship of Hitler, he immigrated to the USA, where he made multiple contributions in the field of science. ]

Weegy: Everyone is entitled to have their own beliefs and ideas in life. These maybe things that they've grown up, a part of their culture or what have been instilled to them since they were young. [ You have to make them learned first before they welcome new ideas. ] (More)

Weegy: Now, the resolution is that the legalization of Marijuana would benefit ALL Americans. Now, I do support legalizing cannabis because I feel that the benefits outweigh the risks. [ But saying that it would benefit every single American seems like a stretch to me.
I feel like Marijuana would benefit people with Glaucoma and people who want to smoke Marijuana for recreation. I am neither. It might soothe my conscience if Marijuana was legalized, but that's about it.
I feel like it's comparable to tobacco being legal, although tobacco is more dangerous than cannabis. I would consider myself to be worse off since tobacco is legal. I don't smoke (I would be MUCH worse off if I did, though), but I don't really appreciate second-hand smoke either. It is hurting the air quality, and so I am not benefited from tobacco being legal. ................. ] (More)

Weegy: The immorality of marijuana use can only be based on one set of moral beliefs. [ For example, it is discriminatory to claim that Judeo-Christian abstinence from intoxication is the correct set of moral beliefs.
] (More)

Weegy: There is no question that if marijuana were any other drug, decisions about its medical use would be up to doctors and patients. Instead, today, the politics of the drug war intervene. [ Patients and doctors who get involved with medical marijuana face potentially grave risks. And government seems committed to maximizing the fear and uncertainty faced by those who might benefit using it.
It need not be this way. Scientific and medical texts going back thousands of years point to medicinal properties for marijuana. Modern scientific studies, including six sponsored by U.S. states in the 1970s and 1980s, demonstrate that smoked marijuana reduces nausea and reduces pain for many patients, especially those facing cancer chemotherapy and glaucoma.
More to the point, thousands of patients and their families and doctors have experienced and witnessed the medical benefits of marijuana. They have told others. They have testified at public hearings and appeared in the mass media. They have contributed to books and research studies on the drug. The phenomenon is real. ............. ] (More)