Why are the semantic actions inside the grammar? I think it would be better if I could express semantic actions on rules after the grammar is formed. It would keep the grammar separate from what the result of the parsing is.

> Why are the semantic actions inside the grammar?> I think it would be better if I could express > semantic actions on rules after the grammar is > formed. It would keep the grammar separate from > what the result of the parsing is.

I know there has been talk about being able to separate actions from rules in Spirit-2, but I don't know what the status of that is. Best to get yourself over to the Spirit mailing list and have your voice heard.