We started collecting meteorites in the summer of 1998. Within a few years, we came to notice an event that kept recurring: a large meteorite would be discovered, purchased, and then be completely cut up and distributed. It seemed to be the natural and accepted order of things, and, at first, we didn’t question it.

Some of those meteorites were relatively ugly lumps. Some of them were spectacularly beautiful meteorites. Many of them – even the pretty ones – were cut up and, to our knowledge, no photos of them were ever taken. No one knows what the 36 kilogram main mass of Tafrawet looked like, but from the endcut that we managed to acquire, we know that it was a spectacularly fresh, fusion-crusted iron with a sculptural shape.

23 kilogram individual of Ziz, still intact. One of equal size was cut. Ziz is chemically and structually indistinguishable from Canyon Diablo -- so much so, in fact, that the classifying scientists initially refused to work on the slice they received -- until they saw a picture of an individual. It is one of the freshest irons to come out of Northwest Africa.

A select few of these meteorites were at least well-documented prior to cutting.
I don't wish to point fingers by naming these meteorites - if only because the cutting is often done by parties far down the chain of ownership of a given meteorite. And, far more basically, we believe that people are entitled to do what they wish with items that they have paid for and own. If someone wants to turn a profit from a meteorite that they have found or bought, they are fully justified in doing so.

But, it is important to ask the question: why were these meteorites cut up? It wasn’t done for science, or to share with collectors, per se. Meteorites are cut up by meteorite dealers because it is easier to sell or trade a number of small pieces of a meteorite than it is to get rid of one larger one.

It doesn’t just happen to larger meteorites. The same principle is the driving force behind the cutting up of even smaller pieces from historic or rare falls like L’Aigle, Mifflin, and especially meteorites that are simply worth more per gram, like Lunar or Martian stones. When a micro might fetch upwards of $10/mg, sales of larger stones simply can’t compete.

Within a few years of buying our first meteorite, we made it our goal to prevent this from happening, as best we could. We understand that meteorites are a valuable scientific resource, and have resolved to keep an entire generation of meteorites from being, for lack of a better word, destroyed.

Cutting a meteorite is an action that can never be undone. Dicing a rock that has survived the perils of four and a half billion years in unsympathetic space, solely for the sake of profit, seems wrong to me. I understand the motivations behind it, and I can sympathize with the fact that, sometimes, ends must be met. But these rocks should lie outside the realm of our worldly troubles. Left intact, they contain untold possibilities for research and discoveries that shadow our present knowledge. Science is ever expanding and still accelerating in its quest to discover and understand the mechanisms that created our solar system and ultimately led to the development of sentient life on earth. These celestial rocks are, with regards to meteoritics, the raw material necessary to fuel that driving force.

In past decades and centuries, institutions satisfied the role of 'conservationist' by acquiring large complete meteorites in order to build up prestigious collections that might be used for public education. They also acted as repositories for what were then regarded as artifacts of great scientific interest. Now that we people better understand meteorites, we revere them less and less, and apparently have little incentive to keep them intact. Institutions in many cases now lack the funds to purchase large complete meteorites, and instead offer pieces from their centuries of hoarded historical meteorites in exchange for specimens of new and interesting finds and falls.

Our collection will never come close in breadth to those of many institutions, but we believe our mission to be important, nonetheless. We consider it our calling to preserve the meteorites of today as best we can so that future generations might have more to look at and study in the years to come.

We understand that many collectors might want a piece of a given meteorite for their collection, and as such, have opted to take a middle road. We offer some pieces of the meteorites we are trying to save from cutting for sale primarily to recoup some of our costs. But instead of entirely dicing up the meteorites we buy intact, especially with more important meteorites, we may remove an extra slice or two when sampling a meteorite for analysis. We always keep more than half of a new meteorite intact, but usually refrain from cutting, except for analysis.

To date we have given educational lectures in schools at nearly every level (elementary, middle, high school, and university). The faculty at UCLA graciously allowed us to display a portion of our collection at the 2002 Meteoritical Society meeting in Los Angeles, and we have partcipated at the annual Cal Day outreach program hosted by UC Berkeley since 2009. A personal find is currently on indefinite loan at Griffith Observatory and we are looking for more institutions in need of meteorites for displays. We were featured in a 2000 Jean Afanassieff documentary, Chasseurs de Météorites, on the recovery of the Chinga meteorites and the hardships that meteorite hunters endure in the Russian Taiga.

Some of the members from the UC Berkeley Sutter's Mill Team, taken the Saturday after the fall.
Our team ultimately recovered eight distinct stones from the fall with a combined weight of nearly 60 grams.

We have 'saved' a number of meteorites from cutting, including the main masses of Burns, Camp Wood, Buffalo Gap, San Ignacio (prov.), Bunker Hill, Saint Augustine, and a number of NWA stones and irons. We have also kept intact the remaining four largest masses of Ziz, as well as many other large, complete meteorites. In many cases, we directly outbid dealers looking to cut up said meteorites.

I am currently working on creating a separate website to showcase some of these specimens.
While we did start collecting meteorites in 1998, we went on our first meteorite hunts in 2000. At first, we didn't really have a good idea of what we were doing, but, in 2002, we found our first new meteorite. It was promptly followed by several more new California stones. We have taken pains to document all of our finds, recording trip logs and taking many photographs. Over the years, we've successfully chased several witnessed falls and have found some hundreds of meteorites, including two new American achondrites.

Summer 2006.Peter (at left) is a physician at a local hospital. Jason (at right) is currently a graduate student at UCLA.

Other things we're working on

Jason helps to edit meteoritics-related paper for "meteorites" - the first open-access (free!) journal devoted to meteorites. You can click on the above banner to see what's going on!

Peter is currently working with the staff at UCLA to help set up an on-site public educational display of meteorites.

We are members of the Meteoritical Society, a non-profit international organization dedicated to fostering research on meteorites and education in related fields.