J.J. Abrams turned down 'Star Wars'

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what's happening in the world as it unfolds.

In a new interview, J.J. Abrams reveals that initially, he did entertain the idea of putting his stamp on "Star Wars."

Story highlights

J.J. Abrams said he chose not to be involved with "Star Wars: Episode VII"

Abrams has made no secret of his affection for "Star Wars"

However, he had no such attachment to "Star Trek" before signing on to direct it

"Star Trek" helmer J.J. Abrams told EW in November that he wouldn't be taking the reins of another intergalactic franchise: Disney's upcoming "Star Wars" extension. But a new interview in Empire Magazine reveals that initially, Abrams did entertain the idea of putting his stamp on "Star Wars."

The "Lost" creator said that he and Kathleen Kennedy, the series's new overseer, had "very early conversations" about how he might be involved in "Star Wars: Episode VII's" development.

Ultimately, though, the longtime Lucas trilogy admirer decided against picking up a lightsaber of his own. "I quickly said that because of my loyalty to 'Star Trek,' and also just being a fan, I wouldn't even want to be involved in the next version of those things," Abrams told Empire. "I declined any involvement very early on. I'd rather be in the audience not knowing what was coming, rather than being involved in the minutiae of making them."

Fair enough. Abrams has made no secret of his affection for "Star Wars." By contrast, he had no such nostalgic attachment to "Star Trek" before signing on to direct it -- which may have made it easier for him to revamp that franchise.

"Little Miss Sunshine" screenwriter Michael Arndt has already signed on to pen "Episode VII," which is scheduled to hit theaters in 2015.

JUST WATCHED

Who will take over for George Lucas?

MUST WATCH

Who will take over for George Lucas?02:54

"X-Men: First Class" director Matthew Vaughn was rumored to be in talks for the film last month; since we know Abrams is out of the picture, confirmation of Vaughn's — or another director's — involvement may come soon.