“And they allowed Apollonius to ask questions; and he asked them of what they thought the cosmos was composed; but they replied; “Of elements.” “Are there then four?” he asked. “Not four,” said Larchas, “but five.” “And how can there be a fifth,” said Apollonius, “alongside of water and air and earth and fire?” “There is the ether,” replied the other, “which we must regard as the stuff of which gods are made; for just as all mortal creatures inhale the wire, so do immortal and divine natures inhale the ether.” “Am I,” said Appollonius, “to regard the universe as a living creature?” “Yes,” said the other. – The Life of Apollonius of Tyana, Philostratus, 220AD

Yeah, yeah. We keep hearing about this. Anything really interesting gets squashed. I heard about this old dude who invented a tuning fork type of device that could heat water in seconds. He never told anyone how he got it to work. Holding out dealing with the money people I guess. Anyways, the dude up and died and told no one how the thing worked. Shit..

Yeah, yeah. We keep hearing about this. Anything really interesting gets squashed. I heard about this old dude who invented a tuning fork type of device that could heat water in seconds. He never told anyone how he got it to work. Holding out dealing with the money people I guess. Anyways, the dude up and died and told no one how the thing worked. Shit..

"The only way we will ever have free energy is if we give it away."- Dr Peter Lindemann.

The patent process of a FREE energy device involves different conditions in comparison to patenting other inventions. The inventor must be aware of these specifically - As these conditions can prevent the invention from reaching the public.

The information on this page describes the elements which concern the patenting of FREE energy technology. Panacea is also providing this information to help inventors learn about the advantages of patenting a FREE energy device verses releasing it through a general purpose license, creative commons and open source.The aim here is to assist the inventor to get their technology known and out to the public.

The inventor must understand ALL the realities of the situation where FREE energy patents are concerned. First one must be aware of the reports from past FREE energy inventors especially a particular patent office employee describing an ever growing hold over FREE energy technology via the corporate patenting process.Then you must understand that there are ways around this.

The following document lists what technologies are to be Secretized by the panel at the Pentagon that looks at every Patent Application this was de-classified via the "Freedom of Information Act".

There were 5,135 inventions that were under secrecy orders at the end of Fiscal Year 2010, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office told Secrecy News last week. It’s a 1% rise over the year before, and the highest total in more than a decade. Under the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951, patent applications on new inventions can be subject to secrecy orders restricting their publication if government agencies believe that disclosure would be “detrimental to the national security.”

The current list of technology areas that is used to screen patent applications for possible restriction under the Invention Secrecy Act is not publicly available and has been denied under the Freedom of Information Act. (An appeal is pending.) But a previous list dated 1971 and obtained by researcher Michael Ravnitzky is available here (pdf). Most of the listed technology areas are closely related to military applications. But some of them range more widely.

Thus, the 1971 list indicates that patents for solar photovoltaic generators were subject to review and possible restriction if the photovoltaics were more than 20% efficient. Energy conversion systems were likewise subject to review and possible restriction if they offered conversion efficiencies “in excess of 70-80%.”One may fairly ask if disclosure of such technologies could really have been “detrimental to the national security,” or whether the opposite would be closer to the truth. One may further ask what comparable advances in technology may be subject to restriction and non-disclosure today. But no answers are forthcoming, and the invention secrecy system persists with no discernible external review.-Source

Note that in there listed is: "Fuel Conservation Technology" and "Alternative Fuels" as being subject to Suppression also "Pollution Reduction Technology" and "Apparatus for Increasing Efficiency" and "Hydrogen Enrichment Technologies". Photo-voltaic panels "in excess of 20% efficient"!! It is interesting that this is the limit of what is AVAILABLE FOR SALE TODAY.

A coincidence?. This is a smoking gun that shows that the corruption in the Pentagon to keep us using primitive and polluting sources of energy to perpetuate their monopolies, is still going strong. these people who Review Patent Applications, HAVE NO CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT AT ALL.

They are a law unto themselves.Of course most things listed there are weapons or tech that could be used for weapons.But are we really worried if "terrorists" can get "60 miles to a gallon of gas" Or if they have solar panels by their caves that are 30% efficient instead of 19% .This document is very damning. It shows that this is not about "weaponization" it is about perpetuating illegal Trusts and monopolies; and is inherently CORRUPT. When we consider these corporations have Public Stocks and actively manipulate the Energy Commodities Markets, it is clear that this is illegal stock manipulation and price fixing on a huge scale.

In this Luke Rudkowski interviews an expert on disruptive technology and creator of the Thrive documentary Foster Gamble. Many rumors have circulated about Donald Trump releasing new technologies that the U.S government has kept secret and in this video, we give you some context on this very important issue.In this Luke Rudkowski interviews an expert on disruptive technology and creator of the Thrive documentary Foster Gamble. Many rumors have circulated about Donald Trump releasing new technologies that the U.S government has kept secret and in this video, we give you some context on this very important issue.

Earlier this year, though, 5G rushed into the Beltway’s limelight after an article in Axios detailed a proposal by a senior National Security Council official to have the federal government build and operate a nationwide 5G network within the next three years. The 30-page proposal, published in Axios, argued that the United States is losing in the 5G arena to China, and that “networks are the dominant competition space.”

However, the FCC voiced opposition to the action and the administration backed away from the proposal, which was never publicly released. (Though the FCC has worked on a number of other issues related to 5G, including small cell deployments and spectrum.)

There remain a wide range of issues that the Trump administration and the wireless industry could cover during the meeting, including how 5G technology might affect the wider economy.