Sharia taking over one State at a time!

Shoutbox

January 29, 2018, 01:21:57 am Christian40 says: It will be interesting to see what happens this year Israel being 70 years as a modern nation may 14 2018January 11, 2018, 06:31:04 am teppezuhodd says: That is the best technology we have nowOctober 17, 2017, 01:25:20 am Christian40 says: It is good to type Mark is here again! October 16, 2017, 03:28:18 am Christian40 says: anyone else thinking that time is accelerating now? it seems im doing days in shorter time now is time being affected in some way?September 24, 2017, 10:45:16 pm Psalm 51:17 says: The specific rule pertaining to the national anthem is found on pages A62-63 of the league rulebook. It states: “The National Anthem must be played prior to every NFL game, and all players must be on the sideline for the National Anthem. “During the National Anthem, players on the field and bench area should stand at attention, face the flag, hold helmets in their left hand, and refrain from talking. The home team should ensure that the American flag is in good condition. It should be pointed out to players and coaches that we continue to be judged by the public in this area of respect for the flag and our country. Failure to be on the field by the start of the National Anthem may result in discipline, such as fines, suspensions, and/or the forfeiture of draft choice(s) for violations of the above, including first offenses.”﻿September 20, 2017, 04:32:32 am Christian40 says: "The most popular Hepatitis B vaccine is nothing short of a witch’s brew including aluminum, formaldehyde, yeast, amino acids, and soy. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin that destroys cellular metabolism and function. Hundreds of studies link to the ravaging effects of aluminum. The other proteins and formaldehyde serve to activate the immune system and open up the blood-brain barrier. This is NOT a good thing."http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-08-11-new-fda-approved-hepatitis-b-vaccine-found-to-increase-heart-attack-risk-by-700.htmlSeptember 19, 2017, 03:59:21 am Christian40 says: bbc international did a video about there street preaching they are good witnessesSeptember 14, 2017, 08:06:04 am Psalm 51:17 says: bro Mark Hunter on YT has some good, edifying stuff too.September 14, 2017, 04:31:26 am Christian40 says: i have thought that i'm reaping from past sins then my life has been impacted in ways from having non believers in my ancestry.September 11, 2017, 06:59:33 am Psalm 51:17 says: The law of reaping and sowing. It's amazing how God's mercy and longsuffering has hovered over America so long. (ie, the infrastructure is very bad here b/c for many years, they were grossly underspent on. 1st Tim 6:10, the god of materialism has its roots firmly in the West) And remember once upon a time ago when shacking up b/w straight couples drew shock awe?

Exodus 20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;View Shout History

An Islamic tribunal, launched in Dallas last year to settle civil disputes among the growing Muslim population, is drawing quarrels over its use of Shariah law.

Opponents fear it would open the door to extreme practices and corporal punishment linked to Shariah law in certain Muslim-majority countries. Still others argue it would replace the U.S. Constitution.

But organizers say the panel of arbitrators issues nonbinding decisions on matters such as business disputes and religious divorces. They note its parallels with Jewish rabbinical courts and Catholic tribunals.

The very word “Shariah” invokes backlash from those who don’t understand it and use it as a “catch phrase for fear-mongering against Islam and Muslims,” said Hadi Jawad, a Dallas businessman and a Muslim.

Tribunals are used in his native Pakistan. “The court system was so clogged and inefficient, it was a handy means to settle conflicts,” Jawad said. “There was usually a handful of judges experienced in Islamic law who could readily handle conflicts.”

“I am concerned about corporal punishment and how Shariah law handles women and non-Muslims,” he said. Shariah law “puts itself above our constitution. We can’t have that or we lose the country.”

Criticism also comes amid backlash blaming all Muslims for violence of the Islamic State, known as ISIS. Many U.S. Muslim groups say ISIS is “un-Islamic” and not a state.

In Irving, Mayor Beth Van Duyne jumped into the controversy after reports that the court was on the grounds of a large mosque there. In a Facebook post, she said the city had nothing to do with the tribunal and that she was trying to understand how it worked. She said if basic rights are being violated, “I will not stand idle, and will fight with every fiber of my being against this action.”

The court uses a conference room in a northeast Dallas law office, where one of the judges works. During a visit there, that judge, Taher el-Badawi, said the tribunal has settled about two dozen cases, mostly of divorcing couples.

“Our community really needs an Islamic tribunal to solve problems,” he said. “And we save money and save time for all the community.”

Managing the cultural diversity within the U.S. Muslim community can be challenging, the organizers said.

About 2 out of 3 U.S. Muslims is foreign-born, according a Pew Research Center study from 2011. No single racial or ethnic identity applies to more than 30 percent of the Muslim-American population, Pew said.

That’s reflected in the tribunal. El-Badawi has a law degree from his native Egypt and a master’s in international law from Southern Methodist University. The two other judges are Lebanon-born Imam Moujahed Bakhach of the Islamic Association of Tarrant County, and Pakistan-born, British-raised Imam Zia ul-Haque Sheikh of the Islamic Center of Irving.

Consultations are free, but a full panel ruling costs $600, el-Badawi said. Hearings take place at the Dallas offices or in conference rooms at some of the nearly 60 mosques in North Texas.

As the controversy has brewed, Imam Zia clarified in a written statement: “These religious tribunals ... do not attempt to impose any belief system upon any individual and work in compliance with State of Texas and U.S. law under the United States Constitution.”

In Arabic, Shariah means “path to water.” It is a personal moral code and religious law, scholars say. It covers issues ranging from dietary restrictions to divorces to punishment for stealing and killing.

Some associate Shariah law with corporal punishment, such as hand amputation for theft, which is a rare practice in other countries, said Alia Salem, executive director of the DFW chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations..

Most scholars, especially in the West, believe such mutilation isn’t “dispensing the laws properly,” Salem said. “There is huge controversy in the Muslim world with regard to that type of punishment.”

Robert A. Hunt, director of global theological education at SMU’s Perkins School of Theology, lived in Muslim-dominated Malaysia for seven years and is an Islam specialist.

Religious court rulings must be consistent with U.S. law, Hunt said. “I’ve researched this carefully, and I know of no case where the judge has ruled on Shariah, as opposed to American law,” he said.

A 2013 report from the Pew center supports that statement. “Disputes over the laws of various religious traditions have occasionally made their way into U.S. civil courts,” it says, “but the Supreme Court consistently has ruled that judges and other government officials may not interpret religious doctrine or rule on theological matters.”

In the U.S. Catholic church, there are nearly 200 diocesan tribunals that handle 15,000 to 20,000 marriage annulments yearly, Pew said. Many Orthodox Jews use rabbinical courts for religious divorces or to resolve business conflicts under Jewish law, known as halakhah, Pew noted.

The 2013 Pew study found no Shariah courts in the U.S. at that time. But imams have long served as voluntary mediators at U.S. mosques.

All the same, a bill proposed in the Texas legislature by Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Plano, would prohibit family court rulings based on foreign legal codes. The bill doesn’t target any one religion, an office staff member said. The National Conference of State Legislatures said there are now seven similar laws in other states.

In North Texas, most tribunal decisions have been done for Muslim immigrants.

El-Badawi said in one case a Christian woman considering divorce from her Muslim husband sought assistance. “They didn’t take our decision, but at least they felt secure in coming to us,” he said.

Women who are reluctant to go to a tribunal of men can meet first with a female counselor. El-Badawi said he would welcome a woman as a tribunal member if she is trained in Islamic law.

Salem said she went to Imam Moujahed, a certified mediator, a few years ago for a religious divorce. She then went to a civil court for the legal divorce under U.S. law.

Moujahed, who is one of the tribunal judges, said he counsels men to view women as equals. “In some cultures, the man is like a God and the wife has to be submissive. This is not Islamic. The wife is a partner.”

A city council in Michigan has unanimously voted to pass a Muslim-based resolution against religious discrimination and hatred.

While the resolution does not specifically mention Islam, Councilman Alex Garza told the News Herald that he introduced the measure to stand in solidarity with the National Network of Arab American Communities’ “Campaign to Take on Hate.” The campaign had been launched recently following the death of three Muslim students in North Carolina who had been shot by an atheist neighbor last month. A motive behind the incident is still being investigated.

“[Taylor] agrees to protect all its citizens and families no matter their religion or ethnicity,” the resolution reads. “As public servants we have an even greater responsibility to speak out against discrimination and hatred because when the unacceptable becomes the norm in our society, human rights for all are threatened.”

“[We will] stand against those who preach hate and incite violence,” it declares.

“I think we should all remind ourselves that this country was not built on us hating each other,” Garza said. “ I think we have to make sure that we continue to remind each other that we support each other and make sure we point out hate when it occurs.”

“This resolution does not commit the city to anything,” he added. “We’re committing to continuing to take on hate in this country.”

Former State Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Muslim, attended the meeting, and told city council that she had been observing “alarming increases in hateful statements” against those of the Islamic religion.

Connect with Christian News

“Engaging our neighbors and colleagues and public servants like yourselves who are not of Arab descent or of Muslim faith is critical in combating increasingly negative images that are leading to criminal acts of violence against places of worship, schools and now even our homes,” she said, asserting that Muslims are now under attack and in danger.

But two area residents who were present spoke against the resolution. One of those was Fred Lyons, who told city council that the measure was unnecessary as no one believes that it is rightful to hate another person.

“I don’t see why we need a resolution to say we’re against hate. We are,” Lyons said. “Anyone who would say you are supporting hate would be asinine.”

Others outside of the city are also expressing concern over the resolution.

“Jihadists are conducting a genocide against Christians across the world and US politicians are passing resolutions prohibiting criticism of genocide, gender apartheid, creed apartheid, misogyny and Islamic Jew-hatred,” wrote Pamela Geller of the Freedom Defense Initiative and Altas Shrugs. “Islamic supremacists are embedding themselves in school boards, town councils, etc., to impose Islam on secular American society. Embedded Muslims … are passing resolutions to impose the sharia — to prohibit criticism of Islam and jihad.”

The Detroit City Council likewise recently passed a resolution in support of the National Network of Arab American Communities campaign, and other cities nationwide, such as Chicago and Los Angeles are expected to consider the measure. It is believed that the effort is based in Dearborn, which has one of the largest Muslim populations in the United States.

'One Nation Under Allah' - School Pledge Of Allegiance In Arabic Leaves Out God And Infuriates US Veterans, Students And Parents As School Issues Apology

A school in New York has been forced to apologize after having students recite the pledge of allegiance in Arabic while leaving out 'God'. Angering countless US Veterans who fought for and won the right for Americans to have the freedom to say the 'Pledge of Allegiance' in English, Pine Brook High School in New York high school succeeded in enraging its' students, parents, US Veterans and now much of the nation for a recent recitement of the 'Pledge' that was done in the Arabic language and substituted 'One Nation Under Allah' for God, prompting a viral outpouring of anger, as shared in the newly released videos below.

The reading of the 'pledge' this week has divided the school and infuriated some parents who took great offense to the events as the school took calls from angry parents who had lost family members overseas as well as Jewish parents, still upset over chronic, anti-semitic behavior at the school back in 2013 that forced them to file a lawsuit in federal court against the school district.

Is it just a coincidence that a school system which failed to stop blatant hatred towards Jews is now pushing the 'Pledge of Allegiance' in Arabic, without God, or is this another sign of the way that this 'new America' is headed?

This is not the 1st time that a school in America has required its' students to recite the pledge in Arabic and replaced 'God' with 'Allah' as shared in the story excerpted below from Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs.

“Thanks to the illegal invasion and the concept of ‘celebrate diversity,’ English is becoming a foreign language in America,” one critic wrote on the local newspaper’s website.

A writer who claimed to be an American of Arab Christian ancestry said he, too, was offended by what happened. “The Pledge of Allegiance isn’t a ‘salute’ to America,” he wrote. “It’s a promise to be loyal to it. Part of that loyalty should be to learn English and integrating into our culture.”

Based on the comments made by the student body president, it appears the Arabic recitation was less about celebrating a foreign language and more about stirring up trouble.

In my most recent book, “God Less America,” I illustrate how the nation’s public schools have been turned into indoctrination centers. Teachers are preaching a liberal ideology. Our schoolhouses have become places where Christianity is marginalized and Islam is given accommodation.

“Thanks to the illegal invasion and the concept of ‘celebrate diversity,’ English is becoming a foreign language in America,” one critic wrote on the local newspaper’s website.

A writer who claimed to be an American of Arab Christian ancestry said he, too, was offended by what happened.

“The Pledge of Allegiance isn’t a ‘salute’ to America,” he wrote. “It’s a promise to be loyal to it. Part of that loyalty should be to learn English and integrating into our culture.”

Based on the comments made by the student body president, it appears the Arabic recitation was less about celebrating a foreign language and more about stirring up trouble.

Shockingly–or maybe not so, considering how left-wing our education establishment is–the school’s president of the student assembly and senior class president, Andrew Zink, insisted that saying the pledge in Arabic is “the right thing to do.”

This is what our kids are being taught, folks.

Unsurprisingly, this same school was already mired in a scandal when it allowed rampant anti-Semitism to go about unchecked. The school was even sued for its failure to stop the blatant hate against Jews. And now it is forcing kids to say the Pledge in Arabic? Yeah. Not surprising at all.

THIS is your government schools, folks.

The school in New York isn’t the only one that has forced kids to recite the Pledge in Arabic. Back in 2013 a Fort Collins, Colorado school also became mired in the Pledge in Arabic.

An Islamic tribunal, launched in Dallas last year to settle civil disputes among the growing Muslim population, is drawing quarrels over its use of Shariah law.

Opponents fear it would open the door to extreme practices and corporal punishment linked to Shariah law in certain Muslim-majority countries. Still others argue it would replace the U.S. Constitution.

But organizers say the panel of arbitrators issues nonbinding decisions on matters such as business disputes and religious divorces. They note its parallels with Jewish rabbinical courts and Catholic tribunals.

The very word “Shariah” invokes backlash from those who don’t understand it and use it as a “catch phrase for fear-mongering against Islam and Muslims,” said Hadi Jawad, a Dallas businessman and a Muslim.

Tribunals are used in his native Pakistan. “The court system was so clogged and inefficient, it was a handy means to settle conflicts,” Jawad said. “There was usually a handful of judges experienced in Islamic law who could readily handle conflicts.”

“I am concerned about corporal punishment and how Shariah law handles women and non-Muslims,” he said. Shariah law “puts itself above our constitution. We can’t have that or we lose the country.”

Criticism also comes amid backlash blaming all Muslims for violence of the Islamic State, known as ISIS. Many U.S. Muslim groups say ISIS is “un-Islamic” and not a state.

In Irving, Mayor Beth Van Duyne jumped into the controversy after reports that the court was on the grounds of a large mosque there. In a Facebook post, she said the city had nothing to do with the tribunal and that she was trying to understand how it worked. She said if basic rights are being violated, “I will not stand idle, and will fight with every fiber of my being against this action.”

The court uses a conference room in a northeast Dallas law office, where one of the judges works. During a visit there, that judge, Taher el-Badawi, said the tribunal has settled about two dozen cases, mostly of divorcing couples.

“Our community really needs an Islamic tribunal to solve problems,” he said. “And we save money and save time for all the community.”

Managing the cultural diversity within the U.S. Muslim community can be challenging, the organizers said.

About 2 out of 3 U.S. Muslims is foreign-born, according a Pew Research Center study from 2011. No single racial or ethnic identity applies to more than 30 percent of the Muslim-American population, Pew said.

That’s reflected in the tribunal. El-Badawi has a law degree from his native Egypt and a master’s in international law from Southern Methodist University. The two other judges are Lebanon-born Imam Moujahed Bakhach of the Islamic Association of Tarrant County, and Pakistan-born, British-raised Imam Zia ul-Haque Sheikh of the Islamic Center of Irving.

Consultations are free, but a full panel ruling costs $600, el-Badawi said. Hearings take place at the Dallas offices or in conference rooms at some of the nearly 60 mosques in North Texas.

As the controversy has brewed, Imam Zia clarified in a written statement: “These religious tribunals ... do not attempt to impose any belief system upon any individual and work in compliance with State of Texas and U.S. law under the United States Constitution.”

In Arabic, Shariah means “path to water.” It is a personal moral code and religious law, scholars say. It covers issues ranging from dietary restrictions to divorces to punishment for stealing and killing.

Some associate Shariah law with corporal punishment, such as hand amputation for theft, which is a rare practice in other countries, said Alia Salem, executive director of the DFW chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations..

Most scholars, especially in the West, believe such mutilation isn’t “dispensing the laws properly,” Salem said. “There is huge controversy in the Muslim world with regard to that type of punishment.”

Robert A. Hunt, director of global theological education at SMU’s Perkins School of Theology, lived in Muslim-dominated Malaysia for seven years and is an Islam specialist.

Religious court rulings must be consistent with U.S. law, Hunt said. “I’ve researched this carefully, and I know of no case where the judge has ruled on Shariah, as opposed to American law,” he said.

A 2013 report from the Pew center supports that statement. “Disputes over the laws of various religious traditions have occasionally made their way into U.S. civil courts,” it says, “but the Supreme Court consistently has ruled that judges and other government officials may not interpret religious doctrine or rule on theological matters.”

In the U.S. Catholic church, there are nearly 200 diocesan tribunals that handle 15,000 to 20,000 marriage annulments yearly, Pew said. Many Orthodox Jews use rabbinical courts for religious divorces or to resolve business conflicts under Jewish law, known as halakhah, Pew noted.

The 2013 Pew study found no Shariah courts in the U.S. at that time. But imams have long served as voluntary mediators at U.S. mosques.

All the same, a bill proposed in the Texas legislature by Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Plano, would prohibit family court rulings based on foreign legal codes. The bill doesn’t target any one religion, an office staff member said. The National Conference of State Legislatures said there are now seven similar laws in other states.

In North Texas, most tribunal decisions have been done for Muslim immigrants.

El-Badawi said in one case a Christian woman considering divorce from her Muslim husband sought assistance. “They didn’t take our decision, but at least they felt secure in coming to us,” he said.

Women who are reluctant to go to a tribunal of men can meet first with a female counselor. El-Badawi said he would welcome a woman as a tribunal member if she is trained in Islamic law.

Salem said she went to Imam Moujahed, a certified mediator, a few years ago for a religious divorce. She then went to a civil court for the legal divorce under U.S. law.

Moujahed, who is one of the tribunal judges, said he counsels men to view women as equals. “In some cultures, the man is like a God and the wife has to be submissive. This is not Islamic. The wife is a partner.”

A growing number of Texans are organizing a civil revolt against the rise and over-reaching influence of Shariah law in their state.

Ever since it was announced that a Muslim Tribunal court was forming in Irving, Texas, tension has been mounting between the local Muslim community and city government officials who recently approved a bill that addressed the influence of the Islamic mediation panel.

That tension is finally coming to a head as large groups from both sides gathered at the last meeting to voice either their support or displeasure over the bill.

While Muslims and leftists in the community promised a heavy turnout at the council meeting on the night of Thursday, April 2, a “patriot group” coordinated through Facebook to ensure an equally heavy turnout of community members in support of the bill.

The mayor of Irving, Beth Van Duyne, has been at the forefront of the legal battle thus far, leading the way in passing the bill and since taking the heat for it.

“Recent events have put me under attack and I need your help now! Stand with me to help me fight for conservative values and the Constitution,” Van Duyne said in a statement on her Facebook page.

While the mayor said most of the attacks have been coming from the liberal media, the Islamic Center in Irving is reported to be drawing its own ire in the form of threatening letters, emails and phone calls.

But local law enforcement looked into these threats and described them more as “rude” than threatening (H/T Bare Naked Islam).

And while Texas State Rep. Jeff Leach said that the new bill will help address the “problem” of the Muslim Tribunal, the bill itself does not reference Islam, Shariah or any religion, according to Mayor Van Duyne.

Liberals and the media are trying to strip religious freedoms from Christians in Indiana, they are seemingly willing to fight just as hard to not only preserve but also expand the rights of Muslims elsewhere.

Share this post on Facebook if you stand with Texas and think there’s no place for Shariah law in America.

The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.” For those who don’t know, Sharia Law is nothing less than the Nazi-ification of a religion. Sharia authorizes murder against non-believers who won’t convert, horrific oppression of women, the execution of gays, the extermination of Jews, and the beheading of anyone who draws Muhammad. Currently anywhere from 3 million to 7 million Muslims live in America.

Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, a senior member of the Saudi monarchy, says he’ll pledge his $32 billion to advance the islamization of America.

The Saudis have spent billions already. 80% of the mosques built in America are Saudi funded. Islamic groups working to impose the sharia are largely funded by the Saudis. We can look forward to 32 billion more of the “kingdom’s brand of Islam, while censoring criticism of Islam.”

And it’s not just the media that is on the receiving end of this blood money, but also Muslim Brotherhood fronts like CAIR, which spend millions whining about how lucrative the “islamophobia” business is. As if …the Saudis have been wildly successful so far.

Wikileaks has begun releasing a trove of documents — half a million cables and other documents from the Saudi Foreign Ministry. Wikileaks declares, “Media is not ‘controlled by Jews’ but by Saudi Arabia: media loyalties purchased around the world.” Notice how this wikileaks release has garnered little press.

Alwaleed says he will model his endowment on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, only with a twist: Much of his philanthropic work will help “foster cultural understanding” of Islam in America and the West.

That means promoting the kingdom’s brand of Islam, while censoring criticism of Islam.

Published reports and books reveal Alwaleed already has pledged millions to radical Muslim Brotherhood front groups that have a secret plan to Islamize America and spread Shariah law throughout the West. These pro-jihad groups can now count on a massive and virtually endless infusion of cash to their war chests. source

The mayor of Seattle and his housing committee have unveiled a plan to increase housing in the city, with a portion of the plan proposing the offering of Sharia law-compliant loans for Muslim residents.

Among the number of ideas offered to make housing more affordable for Seattle residents is a segment that addresses Muslim beliefs, as Sharia law forbids usury for its adherents.

“For our low—and moderate—income Muslim neighbors who follow Sharia law—which prohibits the payment of interest or fees for loans of money—there are limited options for financing a home,” the proposed plan reads. “Some Muslims are unable to use conventional mortgage products due to religious convictions.”

“The City will convene lenders, housing nonprofits and community leaders to explore the best options for increasing access to Sharia-compliant loan products to help these residents become homeowners in Seattle,” it says.

Arsalan Bukhari, chapter executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, told the Puget Sound Business Journal that he believes that there are approximately two hundred Seattle residents who identify as Muslim that avoid taking out home loans because of their religion.

“[T]hey don’t want to pay interest,” he said.

Mayor Ed Murray mentioned the proposal at a recent press conference, which will go to city counsel for consideration.

“We will work to develop new tools for Muslims who are prevented from using conventional mortgage products due to their religious beliefs,” he said.

The Obama administration recently made changes to the Oath of Allegiance to the United States in a manner very conducive to Sharia, or Islamic law.

On July 21, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced some “modifications” to the Oath of Allegiance which immigrants must take before becoming naturalized.

The original oath required incoming citizens to declare that they will “bear arms on behalf of the United States” and “perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States” when required by the law.

Now the USCIS says that “A candidate [to U.S. citizenship] may be eligible to exclude these two clauses based on religious training and belief or a conscientious objection.”

The new changes further add that new candidates “May be eligible for [additional?] modifications based on religious training and belief, or conscientious objection arising from a deeply held moral or ethical code.”

These changes serve incoming Islamic supremacists especially well. For, while Islamic law allows Muslims to feign loyalty to non-Muslim “infidel” authorities, it bans Muslims from living up to the pretense by actually fighting or killing fellow Muslims on behalf of a non-Muslim entity, such as the United States.

The perfectly fitting story of Nidal Hassan—the U.S. army major and “observant Muslim who prayed daily” but then turned murderer—comes to mind and is illustrative.

A pious Muslim, Hasan seemed a “regular American,” even if he was leading a double life—American Army major and psychiatrist by day, financial supporter of jihadi groups and associate of terrorists by night. However, when time came for this American soldier to “bear arms on behalf of the United States”—to quote the original Oath of Allegiance—against fellow Muslims, things got ugly: he went on a shooting spree in Fort Hood, killing thirteen Americans, including one pregnant woman in 2009.

Much of Hasan’s behavior is grounded in the Islamic doctrine of Loyalty and Enmity. According to this essential teaching, Muslims must always be loyal to Islam and fellow Muslims while having enmity for all non-Islamic things and persons.

However, whenever Muslims find themselves under the authority of non-Islamic institutions and persons, they are permitted to feign loyalty—even to the point of cursing Islam and pretending to have abandoned it—with one caveat: Muslims must never take up arms on behalf of “infidels” against fellow Muslims. In other words, their loyalty to non-Muslims must be skin deep.

Many are the verses in the Koran that support this divisive doctrine (3:28, 4:89, 4:144, 9:23, and 58:22; the latter simply states that true Muslims do not befriend non-Muslims—“even if they be their fathers, sons, brothers, or kin”).

Most germane is Koran 3:28: “Let believers not take for friends and allies infidels rather than believers: and whoever does this shall have no relationship left with Allah—unless you but guard yourselves against them, taking precautions.”

The words translated here as “guard” and “precaution” are derived from the Arabic word taqu, from the trilateral root w-q-y—the same root that gives us the word taqiyya, the Islamic doctrine that permits Muslims to deceive non-Muslims whenever under their authority.

Ibn Kathir (d. 1373), author of one of the most authoritative commentaries on the Koran, explains taqiyya in the context of verse 3:28 as follows: “Whoever at any time or place fears … evil [from non-Muslims] may protect himself through outward show.” As proof of this, he quotes Muhammad’s close companion Abu Darda, who said, “Let us grin in the face of some people while our hearts curse them.”[1]

If you [Muslims] are under their [non-Muslims’] authority, fearing for yourselves, behave loyally to them with your tongue while harboring inner animosity for them … [know that] God has forbidden believers from being friendly or on intimate terms with the infidels rather than other believers—except when infidels are above them [in authority]. Should that be the case, let them act friendly towards them while preserving their religion.[2]

And therein lies the limit of taqiyya: when the deceit, the charade begins to endanger the lives of fellow Muslims—whom, as we have seen, deserve first loyalty—it is forbidden. As al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri puts it in his treatise on Loyalty and Enmity, Muslims may pretend to be friendly and loyal to non-Muslims, so long as they do “not undertake any initiative to support them [non-Muslims], commit sin, or enable [them] through any deed or killing or fighting against Muslims” (The Al Qaeda Reader, p. 75).

Thus the idea that Nidal Hasan might be deployed to a Muslim country (Iraq or Afghanistan) was his “worst nightmare.” When he realized that he was about to be deployed, he became “very upset and angry.” The thought that he might injure or kill Muslims “weighed heavily on him.” He also counseled a fellow Muslim not to join the U.S. Army, since “Muslims shouldn’t kill Muslims.”

Hassan is not the only Muslim to expose his disloyalty when pushed into fighting fellow Muslims on behalf of the United States.

In 2010, Naser Abdo, another Muslim soldier who joined the U.S. Army, demanded to be discharged on the claim that he was a “conscientious objector whose devotion to Islam has suffered since he took an oath to defend the United States against all enemies.” The army agreed, but while processing him, officials found child pornography on his government-issued computer and recommended that he be court-martialed. Abdo went AWOL and later tried to carry out a terrorist attack on a restaurant with the use of weapons of mass destruction.

And in April 2005, another Muslim serving in the U.S. Army, Hasan Akbar, was convicted of murder for killing two American soldiers and wounding fourteen in a grenade attack in Kuwait: “He launched the attack because he was concerned U.S. troops would kill fellow Muslims in Iraq.”

In short, the first loyalty of any “American Muslim” who follows the Koran is to fellow Muslims, regardless of their nationality—and not to American “infidels,” even if they be their longtime neighbors whom they daily smiled to (see here for examples). Hence why American Muslim Tarik Shah, who was arrested for terrorist-related charges, once boasted: “I could be joking and smiling [with non-Muslims] and then cutting their throats in the next second”—reminiscent of the aforementioned quote by Muhammad’s companion.

Now, in direct compliance with Islamic law, the Obama administration has made it so that no Muslim living in America need ever worry about having to defend her—including against fellow Muslims or jihadis.

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, a Judith Friedman Rosen Writing Fellow at the Middle East Forum and a CBN News contributor. He is the author of Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (2013) and The Al Qaeda Reader (2007).

Parents Upset that Middle Schoolers Assigned to Write 'Allah is the Only God'"A Christian child should not be made to write that."

Parents at a middle school in Spring Hill, Tennessee, just outside of Nashville, are upset that their children have spent three weeks studying Islam and were assigned to write the Shahada profession of the Islamic faith: "Allah is the only god." Making the situation worse, parents said the teacher skipped over the section on Christianity.

Though the parents understand that a thorough study of history will undoubtedly cover religions from all over the world, they don't understand why so much time is being spent on this one. Plus, the class is delving into learning the specifics of the Five Pillars of Islam and thus causing parents to wonder if that constitutes teaching religion in schools.

“From a religion point of view, if the schools are going to be teaching religion in history, they need to teach them all equally," parent Brandee Porterfield told The Columbia Daily Herald. "For them to spend three weeks on Islam after having skipped Christianity, it seems to be that they are making a choice about which religion to discuss.”

Another parent, Joy Ellis, said she was aware her child was studying Islam but as far as having to write the Shahada, she said, "To me, a Christian child should not be made to write that."

“I honestly don’t want my child learning about Islam at all, but if they’ve got to learn about it, I would like for them to learn about the historical aspects of it and definitely nothing about the religion. I don’t want her writing ‘Allah is the only god,’” Ellis added.

But according to school officials, the class is just following Tennessee state standards adopted by Gov. Bill Haslem. Though he signed a bill against Common Core in May, the new TN Core standards are said to be very similar to the controversial curriculum.

The middle school supervisor for Maury County Public Schools Dr. Jan Hanvey stated that these topics have been covered in the area schools for 31 years and said that the three weeks of study doesn't only focus on the religion but the culture, economics, geography and government around the religion. She assures that only one day is spent talking about Islam and students will also get to Buddhism and Hinduism later on.

Hanvey also stated that the chapter on Christianity wasn't skipped intentionally, but put off for another time, when the history class will study America and the Age of Exploration.

Hanvey blames recent events for causing the public to "fear" Islam, much like the way, she said, people feared the Japanese during World War II. “It’s hard to separate religion from history,” Hanvey said. “It’s teaching about religion. We are not trying to convert.”

In a statement, Spring Hill Middle School Principal Shanda Sparrow acknowledged that perhaps the school did "not do the best job" in warning parents of sensitive subjects that their children were scheduled to learn. To promote an "open dialogue," a parent-teacher meeting is set up for later in September to address the concern.

Maury County Schools Director Chris Marczak wrote a defense on Facebook saying the assignment was to teach the religion to students, not convert them, nor "to endorse one religion over another or indoctrinate." He added:

I encourage all Maury County parents to be their child’s first and main teacher. It is our job as parents of our own children to instill in them the beliefs of our individual households. It’s important that we establish a good working relationship with our children’s teachers and schools so that when there are questions or concerns, teachers and principals are the first line of asking. If we are truly going to Grow Maury County together, then we need to openly talk and discuss about what we want to emphasize in our county. I encourage you to talk with your children, talk with your teachers, and talk with your principals. We are here to help your children be prepared for Life.

A photograph of one of the assignments shows one child's disapproval:

The same issue was raised earlier this year in Florida when high school students were assigned to recite the Five Pillars of Islam and make their own prayer rug. This story also included missing sections of Christianity from the textbook.

Outrage As US Public School Students Forced To Recite ‘Allah Is The Only God’

Public School students forced to recite ‘Allah is the only god’

“But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.” 1 Corinthians 8:6 (KJV)

Amid a new report of Islamic indoctrination in public schools, the American Center for Law and Justice is fighting back with a petition drive that already has garnered 120,000 signatures. Earlier this year, public-school students in Madison, Wisconsin, were given an assignment to “pretend you are Muslim,” while students in Florida were instructed to “recite the Five Pillars of Islam as a prayer, make Islamic prayer rugs and perform other Muslim rituals,” ACLJ said Monday.

Nearly 120,000 people have signed ACLJ’s petition demanding a halt to such teaching. “What if your child or grandchild’s public school forced them to write out the Shahada – the Islamic conversion creed – while having skipped Christianity?” the organization asked.

“What if your child’s study guide had a section called ‘Origins of Islam’ that included statements such as, ‘Around the age of 40, the angel Gabriel told Muhammad that he was to be a prophet of Allah.’ “Stated as fact, not belief,” the ACLJ said.

The Columbia Daily Herald in Middle Tennessee reported details of the allegations. In the Maury County school district, the paper reported parent Brandee Porterfield said her daughter “brought home school materials containing the Five Pillars of Islam.”But the school skipped the textbook’s section on Christianity.

School officials explained, she told the Herald, that Christianity was not part of the state’s standards, so it wasn’t covered.

“I have a big problem with that. From a historical point of view, that’s a lot of history these kids are missing,” Porterfield told the newspaper. “Also, for them to spend three weeks on Islam after having skipped Christianity, it seems to be that they are making a choice about which religion to discuss.”

She said her concerns were about her seventh-grade daughter being taught the “Shahada,” the profession of Islamic faith.

“From a religion point of view, if the schools are going to be teaching religion in history, they need to teach them all equally,” she said. The ACLJ reported called it “Islamic indoctrination right here in our schools.”

The organization said Maury County school officials admitted they were addressing “some sensitive topics” in class and there appeared to be some “confusion.”

“That’s outrageous,” ACLJ said. “The indoctrination of students with the precepts of converting to Islam and forcing them to recite ‘Allah is the only god’ aren’t ‘sensitive topics’; it’s unconstitutional.

“Imagine the outcry from the ACLU, Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), and other leftist and angry atheist organizations if a study guide states, ‘Jesus is the Son of God,’ and forced children to recite the Lord’s Prayer.”Now, Sekulow’s organization said it is taking action.

“We’re in direct contact with a number of parents and concerned citizens, we’re taking on new clients, and preparing critical demand letters and open records requests to these schools and school districts,” the group said.

“It is a clear constitutional principle that public education may not indoctrinate young minds into a religion. Teachers and schools may teach what different faith traditions believe and how that has affected world history and geography. But a school cannot censor Christianity and promote Islam.”

The Daily Herald reported Jan Hanvey, a middle school supervisor for Maury County Public Schools, said the curriculum has covered the subject for decades, and Buddhism and Hinuism also are covered.She told the newspaper the chapter on Christianity was not skipped but was being delayed.

The newspaper cited state advisories that called for seventh-grade social studies to begin with the Islamic world and then move to Africa. The “Age of Exploration” follows, which continues into eighth grade.

Hanvey told the newspaper Christianity is discussed in the “Age of Exploration,” partly because religious persecution is one of the reasons for a search for a new world.

Fox News reported Maury County Director of Schools Chris Marczak said his teachers “work together to make sure that our students are learning what is expected through the Tennessee academic standards.”

“For this last section on the Islamic World this past week, our educators had students complete an assignment that had an emphasis on Islamic faith,” he said. “The assignment covered some sensitive topics that are of importance to Islamic religion and caused some confusion around whether we are asking students to believe in or simply understand the religion.”

WND reported earlier this year teachers and administrators at a Pennsylvania school district attended a training session on Islam and Arabic culture at taxpayer expense.

The workshop in the town of Lebanon was led by a former district Arabic translator, Mohamed Omar, who took time off from his Department of Human Services job in Philadelphia “to share his knowledge of Islam with the staff,” the Lebanon Daily News reported.

“I think this is the first time ever in the United States that a school district goes to a mosque,” mosque founder Hamid Housni told the Daily News. “Usually a representative of a mosque goes somewhere. We don’t have words to explain to you how we appreciate that. This is very, very special.”

In 2006, WND reported students in Nyssa, Oregon, were learning Muslim prayers and dressing as Muslims.

Another assignment was to learn the Five Pillars of Islam, study the Muslim holiday of Ramadan and listen to guest speakers, including an American Muslim who came dressed in her religious costume to talk about her Quran.

A resulting lawsuit regarding the curriculum was similar to a previous case in which the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals eventually ruled such indoctrination was permissible as “cultural education.” source

...According to a local newspaper report, Omar Ahmad, a founder of CAIR, told a conference hall packed with California Muslims in July 1998 that Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. ...A poll...in May 2015 by the Center for Security Policy showed that 51 percent of American Muslims preferred that they should have their own Shariah courts outside of the legal system ruled by the U.S. Constitution.

A few years ago the Oregonian's Helen Jung was whining about how the FBI was being mean to the nice Imam and his mosque.

The unexplained actions are aggravating the FBI's already poor relationship with the mosque and fueling fear and frustration among Muslims that their house of worship appears to be once again in the government's cross hairs...

In Oregon, Masjed As-Saber stands out for its traditional focus and charismatic imam, who urges worshippers to stay true to the vast library of strict Islamic teachings, down to the conviction that men and women shouldn't trim their eyebrows.

Why that poor man. The FBI is persecuting him just because he opposes eyebrow trimming.

Kariye briefly mentioned in one sermon his concerns that nonorganic food is threatening people's health.

Organic food... and murdering Americans. Why this Imam is so progressive.

The imam of Portland's biggest mosque collected money from worshippers after 9/11, sending the Portland Seven to Afghanistan to fight against coalition forces, the U.S. Department of Justice alleges in its fight to deport the imam.

As religious leader of Masjed As-Saber, Kariye told several members of the plot that "Muslims should fight with fellow Muslim brothers of Afghanistan against Americans" and that this combat was a "righteous fight ... legitimate jihad," Justice Department lawyers wrote in an exhibit filed earlier this month in the immigration case.

Oregon clearly needs more Somalis and their Muslim scholars. Because of the eyebrow trimming and the terrorism.

MULTICULTURALISM IS THE DEATH OF ANY NATION’S IDENTITY AND SOVEREIGNTY

Hamtramck City Council in Michigan has done something never before achieved in the 239 years of the American nation. They have elected a Muslim-majority City Council. Voters gave Abu Musa and Anam Miah another term in office. Saad Almasmari was elected for the first time. Now four of the six City Council members will be of Muslim faith.

“We are very proud and we are very happy for that achievement, what we have done in this city, for our city,” said Jamal Alturki, a voter.

“I think that sends a message not only to Hamtramck but throughout the region that people want their representation in offices,” Miah said.

Years from now, after America has fallen and is shackled to the demonic Sharia Law, when historians looks back to see where it all begin, Hamtramck will be the “ground zero” that they will point to. One of the things that makes America so great – the ability for the people to elect the government of their choosing – is, ironically, also her greatest weakness. When the Irish and Germans came here in the early 1900’s, they provided the labor backbone to build our infrastructure and also became our cities firefighters and policemen. When the Jews came here, America became the financial and movie capital of the world. Every ethnic people group that arrived here legally has assimilated themselves into the American culture and made us a better, stronger and more prosperous nation. Not so with the Muslims.

MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE INTO THEIR HOST NATIONS, THEY INFILTRATE UNTIL THEIR NUMBERS REACH A TIPPING POINT

The laughable assertions of Kenyan-born Barack Hussein Obama aside, Muslims as an ethnic group have never made a contribution to American society that was purely for the benefit of the American people. Why? Because there is not a Muslim on the face of the Earth, if they are a good Muslim, that has any desire at all to fit in and assimilate into the culture of their host nation. Their Qu’Ran tells them to seize and claim all foreign land for Allah.

UK ISLAMIST LEADER: ISLAM WILL DOMINATE AMERICA:

They’ve been called “megaphone jihadists,” radical Muslims who take to the streets of Western cities demanding Islamic sharia law.

What you just watched in this video is not “radical” Islam, it is just Islam. The goal of Islam, all Islam, is world domination and conquest so they can implement the Sharia. Today, it’s a Muslim-majority City Council, and the liberal nuts clap and cheer our misguided and misplaced “diversity”. But tomorrow, it is a Muslim-majority Congress and Senate with the US Constitution thrown in the trash and the Qu’ran and Sharia Law in it’s place. To get it, all they have to do is continue to breed in large numbers, and they are, then vote themselves into office, which they are now doing.

Ronald Reagan tried to warn us to remain vigilant all those years ago, but somehow, even in the aftermath of 9/11, we have failed to heed his warning:

“I DON’T THINK YOU CAN OVERSTATE THE IMPORTANCE THAT THE RISE OF ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM WILL HAVE TO THE REST OF THE WORLD IN THE CENTURY AHEAD-ESPECIALLY IF, AS SEEMS POSSIBLE, ITS MOST FANATICAL ELEMENTS GET THEIR HANDS ON NUCLEAR AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND THE MEANS TO DELIVER THEM AGAINST THEIR ENEMIES.” – RONALD REAGAN

In 2015, the greatest threat to world peace comes from Islamic terrorism. At this very moment, England, Germany, France and the Netherlands are under attack from biological jihad. But their main goal, the “big prize”, is the conquest and submission of America to the Sharia.

History will record that the Muslim-majority Hamtramck City Council is that first, successful step.

PARENTS IRATE AFTER STUDENTS TOLD TO SING MUSLIM TUNE'This is their fight song. Spread Islam now song. Prove that they're right song'

Parents at a California middle school are demanding to know why a teacher had students sing an Islamic “fight song.”

A seventh-grade teacher at Spring View Middle School in Huntington Beach, California, deviated from the district’s official curriculum and had students sing “This Is My Fight Song.” Parent and grandparent Nichole Negron and Susan Negron told KCAL 9 Los Angeles their seventh grader was told to participate in the activity.

“I believe that by singing the song, the children feel comfortable that maybe Allahu is the only god and maybe that they should start following him,” Susan Negron told the network Tuesday. “I’m not OK with that.”

The women only found out about the activity by accident when Negron’s son brought a pamphlet with lyrics home.

“How can we as parents combat against what we don’t know is going on?” the mother asked.

The two women went to the Ocean View school board on Tuesday night looking for answers. The teacher allegedly wanted students to learn about Islam through a “catchy” tune.

The lyrics to “This Is My Fight Song” go as follows:

Like a sandstorm in the desert, sending camels into motion.Like how a single faith can make a heart open, they might only have one god,But they can make an explosion.

All those things they have to say, Islam … Allahu’s on the way.They will preach them loud tonight. Can you hear the voice this time?This is their fight song. Spread Islam now song. Prove that they’re right song.

Ojaala Ahmed of the Council for American Islamic Relations in Anaheim told the CBS affiliate she wanted to know why the teacher shared the song, given that Islamic radical terror attacks in Paris, France, last Friday killed 129 and injured over 350.

“Especially with the recent attacks ISIS has been doing, knowing that this potentially Islamaphobic backlash might come about, what was the teacher’s intention?” Ahmed asked.

The school district sent an apology to parents and said it would continue looking into the incident, the network reported.

A leader of New York City’s Syrian community told The Post on Wednesday that ISIS terrorists have “absolutely” sneaked into America by posing as civil-war refugees — and joined sleeper cells just waiting to be activated.

“I believe the terrorists from Syria have been coming into the United States, not only in the past few years, but way before that,” said Aarafat “Ralph” Succar of Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, home of the city’s largest enclave of Syrian immigrants. “I think they’re already at work.”

Succar, a member of the Bay Ridge Community Council, said corruption in his homeland is so rampant that anyone could easily pay bribes and obtain official identification papers bearing a fake name to disguise their real identity.

“You can go to the Syrian government today and say to them, ‘I need a piece of paper that says I’m Tony Caterpillar.’ And they give it to you,” he said.

“These are not forged documents. These are written out by a government employee who needs money, whose family has no food.”

Succar, 57, who immigrated to the United States when he was 10, also noted that “Third World countries, particularly places like Syria, do not have the network of information the United States has.”

“In Syria, there’s no such thing. So when they tell you that [the refugees] are vetted, are you out of your mind?” he said.

Meanwhile, officials in Honduras said Wednesday that five Syrian nationals headed for the United States had been caught with fraudulent ID papers in the capital city of Tegucigalpa, Reuters reported.

The men were detained late Tuesday after arriving from Costa Rica when authorities discovered their Greek passports had been stolen and doctored to replace the photos with pictures of the Syrians.

Mayor Bill de Blasio said Wednesday that “a grand total of eight” Syrian refugees had settled in the city as part of an official State Department program, and City Hall later lowered that number to four, blaming the information mixup on the feds.

A Utah school is apologizing after a ninth grade teacher assigned students to draw a propaganda poster for ISIS.

The teacher, who's been on the job for just a few months, gave the in-class assignment to students in her two World Civics classes at Salem Junior High School in Salem, Utah, on Wednesday. About 60 students received the assignment, which required them to create a "neat, colored, professional" poster for the terrorist group, to "help students better understand the goals of terrorist groups and the methods they use to gain support," the assignment read.

The teacher included a note asking students to come forward if they felt uncomfortable with the assignment. None did, Lana Hiskey, a spokeswoman for the Nebo School District where the school is located, told ABC News.

ISIS Threatens to Attack Washington in New Video

'Negative Meaning' Forces School to Rename ISIS Registration

American-Muslim Leaders Say ISIS 'Has Declared War on All of Us'

But some parents did not think the assignment was appropriate, especially after six coordinated terrorist attacks last week in Paris have left 130 dead.

"We shouldn't be talking about how ISIS recruits, we should be discussing the events of what they have caused to figure a way of how to deter that and how to help better the world," Annie Langston, whose daughter received the assignment, told ABC News. "I thought this isn't right, not right now."

The possibility of having to search for ISIS recruiting material on the web at a time when officials are looking to detect potential threats was alarming, Langston said.

The assignment had not been approved by school administrators, Hiskey said, adding that teachers at the school meet each week to discuss best practices.

"That never happened with this one," said Hiskey.

Four parents contacted the school on Thursday to express their concern.

"As soon as the administration heard of this and reviewed the material, they immediately removed the assignment," Hiskey said.

The school contacted the parents of all students in both classes and notified the students that they were not required to complete the assignment, Hiskey said. The teacher said she is sorry about the assignment, according to Hiskey. She is still teaching at the high school.

"She did this innocently, she's a naive young teacher," Hiskey said. "She wants to do the right thing."

Massive Worldwide Support for Sharia Law Among Global Muslim Community

In the aftermath of the uproar caused by Donald Trump’s press release “calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on,” the Pew Research Center released some truly astonishing polling data on the support among Muslims worldwide for Sharia law.

Everywhere we look around the globe, there are substantial—and generally dominant—percentages of Muslims who favor making Sharia the official law in their country.

Aircraft carrying 163 Syrian refugees touches down in Toronto just before midnight on Thursday and will be followed by a second military airlift to Montreal on Saturday.

After months of promises and weeks of preparation, the first Canadian government planeload of Syrian refugees landed in Toronto on Thursday, aboard a military aircraft met by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Trudeau was elected to a surprise majority in October promising to accept more refugees more quickly than the previous Conservative government.

"This is a wonderful night, where we get to show not just a planeload of new Canadians what Canada is all about, we get to show the world how to open our hearts and welcome in people who are fleeing extraordinarily difficult situations," Trudeau told airport workers and volunteers standing by to meet the refugees.

Trudeau's Liberal government scaled back the number of Syrian migrants it will accept by year end after the attacks in Paris sparked concern that the election promise to bring in 25,000 by December 31 would not allow enough time for security checks.

The plane carrying 163 Syrian refugees touched down in Toronto just before midnight on Thursday and will be followed by a second military airlift to Montreal on Saturday. Trudeau has said 10,000 will be resettled by the end of the year and a further 15,000 by the end of February.

As Trudeau met the military aircraft amid tight security at a special terminal, privately sponsored Syrian refugees were arriving on commercial flights at Toronto's main terminal, greeted by sponsors and ordinary Canadians who had come to the airport to welcome the much-anticipated newcomers.

"They are very tired, but they are happy and hopeful," said Soriya Dasir, a worker with Abraham Festival, a group that sponsored a single mother and three children who had been living in a camp in Jordan for two years, as she escorted them past waiting media.

Toronto's airport authority urged Canadians not to come to the airport to greet the refugees or drop off donations, saying: "We're so proud that our community wants to help, but such a response would be very overwhelming for those arriving."

The request did not deter Shai Reef, 20, who held up a sign that read: "Welcome to Canada" in Arabic.

"I'm here to show my solidarity for and support of the Syrian people going through genocide in Syria," Reef said. "As Jews, we were also locked out, I know what it feels like."

Toronto's mayor tweeted a welcome, while the Toronto Star, the country's largest newspaper, covered its front page with a "Welcome to Canada" banner headline in English and Arabic, along with an article explaining Canadian weather, ice hockey and slang.

The reception in Canada contrasted sharply with that of the neighboring United States, where fear of Syrian refugees following the deadly November 13 Paris attacks spurred opposition to allowing them entry. Some US governors said their states would not accept Syrian refugees.

With security concerns, immigration paperwork and the flight's late-night arrival, refugees on the military aircraft were to be put up at a nearby hotel for the night before meeting their sponsors and resettlement agencies on Friday.

BY THOSE THAT PRACTICE IT, IT IS CALLED A “RELIGION OF PEACE”. THERE ARE THOSE, HOWEVER, WHO WOULD DISAGREE WITH THAT STATEMENT

“And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.” Genesis 16:12 (KJV)

Some people see the Muslims as an angry, violent people who use the two-fold method of Jihad and Fatah to further their geopolitical plans, and sadly, the vast majority of people both here in America and abroad, remain blissfully ignorant of the ever-swelling tide of Muslim cultural expansion. In this article, we will show you, mostly in their own words and pictures, just exactly what the goal of Islam really is. We will not defame, demean or otherwise say anything that is not true about the position they hold. We will show you their words, photos of them in “action”, and let you make up your mind about what Islam is really all about.

A quick Google images search of the words Islam will dominate gives you quite the eyeful. It shows very quickly photos from around the world of Muslims carrying signs and banners that proclaim things like “freedom can go to hell”, “Islam will dominate the world”, and “Shariah law – the true solution”, as well as many other cute little tag lines. My first take on that is that it doesn’t seem overly friendly.

JIHAD IN AMERICA – THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD DECEPTION

Is this the work of scattered “radical fringe groups”, or is it the views of the majority of Muslims around the world? Well, look at it like this: someone has said that only 1% of Muslims worldwide are Jihadists. Ok, that’s fine, 1% is a small number…until…you realize that at last count there was 1,300,000,000 Muslims worldwide. For those of you who are math challenged that’s about 1.3 billion Muslims. What is 1% of 1.3 billion? It is 10.3 million Muslims that engage in passive or active Jihad.

Since 9/11 there have been an estimated 27,736 deadly terror attacks carried out worldwide, and all by Muslim terrorists. In November of 2015 alone, there was 169 jihad attacks in 30 countries which resulted in 1,455 dead people with 1,706 critically injured. You really need to think about what stats like that mean.

TRAINING LITTLE CHILDREN TO BE JIHADI TERRORISTS FOR ALLAH

Watch this video about a Palestinian kid’s show called “The Children’s Club”. This show is the equivalent for them, of Sesame Street here in the USA…with one big exception. I won’t spoil it for you, but guarantee that it will be quite the eye-opener for you. Remember, this is a national program that is funded by not only their government but partially from our government as well. Watch and learn what is in the “hearts and minds” of Muslims.

THE KORAN VS. THE REST OF THE WORLD

The Muslim “holy” book, the Koran, is filled with words of wisdom on how Muslims should live their lives, and how they should interact with those around them. The following is just a few quotes taken directly from the Koran. Just let the reassuring, calming words of the Prophet Muhammad and his “religion of peace” wash over you like gentle rain from above.

On Interacting with Jews and Christians:“O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.” Sura 5, verse 51

“And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah DESTROY them; how they are turned away!” Sura 9, verse 30

“And the Jews will not be pleased with you, nor the Christians until you follow their religion. Say: Surely Allah’s guidance, that is the (true) guidance. And if you follow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, you shall have no guardian from Allah, nor any helper.” Sura 2, verse 120On Living In Peace With Non-Muslims:

“And KILL them (the unbelievers) wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers.” Sura 2, verse 191

“Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends rather than believers; and whoever does this, he shall have nothing of (the guardianship of) Allah, but you should guard yourselves against them, guarding carefully; and Allah makes you cautious of (retribution from) Himself; and to Allah is the eventual coming.” Sura 3, verse 28

“And whoever does not believe in Allah and His Apostle, then surely We have prepared burning fire for the unbelievers.” Sura 48, verse 13The Koran vs. the Holy Bible:

Ok, so the “holy” book that ALL Muslims read everyday, the Koran, commands them, it’s not a just a suggestion, but they are commanded to “kill the unbelievers where they find them”. This is in very sharp contrast to the bible where Jesus says this about unbelievers –

“But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;” Matthew 5:44 (KJV)

So let me ask you this – if you had to have a neighbor whose religion was not your own, would you rather have a Muslim who is commanded to kill YOU, the “unbeliever”, or would you rather have a follower of the Holy Bible who is commanded to love you, pray for you and do good for you even if you are his spiritual opposite?

WAGING WAR VIA BIOLOGICAL JIHAD

We all know the explosive violence of Islamic Jihad, and have seen countless images on the news for the past 3 decades now. But violent Jihad is not the only weapon the Muslims have in their quest to “take over the world”, they also have “biological” Jihad.

THE CHANGING MUSLIM DEMOGRAPHICS AROUND THE WORLD:

Biological Jihad is the Muslim practice of emigrating to every major country around the world, and having as many children as possible. The average number of people in a European Muslim family is 8, with many families having as many as 10 to 14. By increasing the number of Muslim living in any one particular country, they eventually will become the dominant force in that country as their people go in to public life, are elected to prominent positions, and then change the laws of that country to suit the Muslim ideology. Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qaddafi said it like this:

“WE HAVE 50 MILLION MUSLIMS IN EUROPE. THERE ARE SIGNS THAT ALLAH WILL GRANT ISLAM VICTORY IN EUROPE – WITHOUT SWORDS, WITHOUT GUNS, WITHOUT CONQUESTS. THE FIFTY MILLION MUSLIMS OF EUROPE WILL TURN IT INTO A MUSLIM CONTINENT WITHIN A FEW DECADES.” FROM THE MIDDLE EAST MEDIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE.

So when you see all these stories in 2015 about how hard Obama is pushing Muslim immigration in the United States, you can clearly see how that advances and benefits the Muslim doctrine of Biological Jihad.

“A New York hotel is staking its claim to have invented a new hospitality niche — birth tourism. The Marmara Manhattan offers “an exclusive package for new mothers that wish to give birth in the USA”, with the additional bonus of the newborn child gaining US citizenship. The hotel, which is part of the Turkish hospitality chain, exploits the 14th amendment to the US constitution, which states that all children born on American soil “are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

In England this started over 20 years ago, now the country is crawling with a Muslim population that is threatening to – LEGALLY – take over because there are almost more Muslims than there are non-Muslims. And when that happens, they simply vote themselves into office, and from there it’s a pretty simple process to – LEGALLY – institute Sharia law.

Just how badly do Muslims wish to takeover this country? It is the fondest desire of their heart to one day see the Muslim flag flying over the White House. Don’t think it could happen? Just look around you – it is already happening.

When the Muslims declared nearly 30 years ago that “we will claim England for Islam”, people laughed, just like people laughed at Hitler in 1932. They said he looked like Charlie Chaplin, and made fun of his freaky little mustache. But no one is laughing now.

Now that you have seen and heard what the Muslim plan for world domination is, I would like to ask you a question. Do you take comfort in the fact that it’s only the “radical” element who thinks this way, and not all Muslims? After all, it’s only a mere 10,300,000 Muslims on the radical fringe, nothing to be alarmed about, right?

Think about that the next time you pass another Muslim school that has just opened in your town, or as you drive past yet another mosque in the downtown area in which you live. And just keeping on saying to yourself, “it’s only the radicals who think like this…it’s only the radicals that think like this”

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/paul-ryan-barack-obama-betray-america-spending-bill/PAUL RYAN PARTNERS WITH BARACK OBAMA TO BETRAY AMERICA WITH ‘FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION’ SPENDING BILLA vote could occur as early as Thursday after midnight, giving lawmakers and the public only one full business day to review the 2,242 page package. The Ryan-Pelosi package represents nothing short of a complete and total betrayal of the American people.12/17/15

REP. PAUL RYAN’S FIRST MAJOR LEGISLATIVE ACHIEVEMENT IS A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SELL-OUT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MASQUERADING AS AN APPROPRIATIONS BILL.

Too harsh, you say? Let the programs, the spending, and the implications speak for themselves.

EDITOR’S NOTE: NOW YOU KNOW WHY, IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, WHY MOST OF THE GOP HATES DONALD TRUMP, BECAUSE HE IS GOING TO STOP THE VAST MAJORITY OF THIS NONSENSE. TRUMP HAS NO LOYALTY TO ANY PARTY, HE IS GOING TO DO WHAT MAKES THE BEST BUSINESS SENSE FOR AMERICA. THIS IS WHY TRUMP “MUST BE STOPPED”, HE WILL END THE FREE RIDE.

(1) Ryan’s Omnibus Fully Funds DACA

Though much of the public attention has surrounded the President’s 2014 executive amnesty, the President’s 2012 amnesty quietly continues to churn out work permits and federal benefits for hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. Paul Ryan’s bill funds entirely this 2012 executive amnesty for “DREAMers”—or illegal immigrants who came to the country as minors.

Specifically, Division F of Ryan’s omnibus bill contains no language that would prohibit the use of funds to continue the President’s unconstitutional program. Obama’s executive action, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), has granted around 700,000 illegal aliens with work permits, as well as the ability to receive tax credits and federal entitlement programs. A recent GAO report documented how this illegal amnesty program for alien youth is, in large part, responsible for the illegal alien minor surge on our southern border.

In 2013, Paul Ryan said that it is his job as a U.S. lawmaker to put himself in the shoes of “the DREAMer who is waiting” and work to find legislative solutions to his or her problems.

(2) Ryan’s Omnibus Funds Sanctuary Cities

Five months ago, 32-year-old Kate Steinle was bleeding to death in her father’s arms. She was gunned down in broad daylight by a five-time deported criminal alien whose presence in the country was the direct result of San Francisco’s refusal to comply with U.S. immigration law—yet Paul Ryan’s omnibus rewards these lawless Sanctuary Cities with federal grants. Division B Title II of Ryan’s omnibus funds various grant programs for the Department of Justice (pages 167, 168, and 169) and contains no language that would restrict the provision of such grants to sanctuary jurisdictions.

Despite broad support amongst Republican lawmakers for a proposal introduced by

Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX) to halt all refugee resettlement, Ryan’s appropriations bill will fund President Obama’s refugee resettlement operation and will allow for the admission of tens of thousands of refugees with access to federal benefits. Division H Title II of Ryan’s bill contains appropriations of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and contains no language that would restrict the program. Nor are there any restrictions for the program in Division K of Ryan’s bill, which provides funding for the Department of State, which oversees refugee admissions.Ryan is not one of the 84 cosponsors of Babin’s bill to halt the refugee operation, and he recently told Sean Hannity that he does not support halting resettlement because, “We’re a compassionate country. The refugees laws are important laws.” Similarly, this outcome represents a legislative win for

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who told Sean Hannity he’d “hate to use” Congress’s power of the purse to deny funding for Obama’s resettlement operation.(4) Ryan’s Omnibus Funds All of the Mideast Immigration Programs That Have Been Exploited by Terrorists in Recent Years

Although multiple immigrant and visa programs in recent years have been exploited by terrorists (such as the F-1 “student” visa, the K-1 “fiancée” visa, and our green card and refugee programs), Ryan’s proposal does nothing to limit admissions from jihadist-prone regions. As Senators Shelby and Sessions of Alabama noted in a joint statement: “The omnibus would put the U.S. on a path to approve admission for hundreds of thousands of migrants from a broad range of countries with jihadists movements over the next 12 months, on top of all the other autopilot annual immigration.”

Senior legislative aides tell Breitbart News that Ryan’s bill does not do anything to change the enforcement priorities that Jeh Johnson established a little over a year ago that would shield entire categories of criminal aliens from immigration law, nor does it include language recommended by Sessions and Shelby to “deny the expenditure of funds to issue visas to countries that refuse to repatriate criminal aliens.”

(7) Ryan’s Omnibus Quadruples H-2B Foreign Worker Visas

Despite Ryan’s pledge not to move an immigration compromise with President Obama, tucked 700 pages into Ryan’s spending bill is language that would resuscitate and expand a controversial provision of the Schumer-Rubio Gang of Eight plan to increase the H-2B visa program.

The provision “would quadruple the number of H-2B visas for unskilled guest workers, for a total of more than 250,000,” writes immigration attorney Ian Smith. The Americans who fill these jobs are typically “society’s most vulnerable — including single women, the disabled, the elderly, minorities, teenagers, students, and first-generation immigrants,” Smith explains.

A recent BuzzFeed exposé revealed how this program allows businesses to discriminate against American workers and “deliberately den[y] jobs to American workers so they can hire foreign workers on H-2 visas instead.” As one GOP aide told Breitbart News, “This provision is a knife in the heart of the working class, and African Americans.”

( Ryan’s Omnibus Funds Tax Credits for Illegal Aliens

Ryan’s bill preserves the expansion of the President’s expiring child tax credits without any accompanying language to prevent illegal aliens from receiving those tax credits. While Sen. Sessions attempted to include language in the bill that would prevent illegal immigrants from receiving tax credits, his recommendation was rejected.

(9) Ryan’s Omnibus Locks-In Huge Spending Increases

The bill funds the Obama-Boehner budget deal, which eliminated spending caps, and will increase both defense and non-defense spending next year by $25 billion more each.

(10) Ryan’s Omnibus Fails to Allocate Funds to Complete the 700-Mile Double-Layer Border Fence That Congress Promised the American People

Nearly a decade ago with the passage of the 2006 Secure Fence Act, the American people were promised a 700-mile double-layer border fence. However, funding for the fence was later gutted and, as a result, its construction was never completed. Despite heightened media focus over the past six months about Americans’ desire for this barrier to illegal entry, Ryan’s bill does not require that funds be allocated to finish the construction of the 700-mile double-layer fence.

A VOTE COULD OCCUR AS EARLY AS THURSDAY AFTER MIDNIGHT, GIVING LAWMAKERS AND THE PUBLIC ONLY ONE FULL BUSINESS DAY TO REVIEW THE 2,242 PAGE PACKAGE. THE RYAN-PELOSI PACKAGE REPRESENTS NOTHING SHORT OF A COMPLETE AND TOTAL BETRAYAL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Yet Ryan’s omnibus serves a second and equally chilling purpose. By locking in the President’s refugee, immigration, and spending priorities, Ryan’s bill is designed to keep these fights out of Congress by getting them off the table for good. Delivering Obama these wins–and pushing these issues beyond the purview of Congress–will suppress public attention to the issues and, in so doing, will boost the candidacy of the Republican establishment’s preferred presidential contenders, who favor President Obama’s immigration agenda.

What may prove most discouraging of all to Americans is that recent reports reveal that conservatives in the so-called House Freedom Caucus are praising Ryan even as he permanently locks in these irreversible and anti-American immigration policies.According to Politico, the House Freedom Caucus will “give Ryan a pass” even as he funds disastrous policies that prioritize the interests of foreign nationals and global corporatists above the needs of the American people whom lawmakers are supposed to represent. source

Lumping together violence with “hateful rhetoric” is a call to destroy the freedom of speech.

December 17, 2015 ought henceforth to be a date which will live in infamy, as that was the day that some of the leading Democrats in the House of Representatives came out in favor of the destruction of the First Amendment. Sponsored by among others, Muslim Congressmen Keith Ellison and Andre Carson, as well as Eleanor Holmes Norton, Loretta Sanchez, Charles Rangel, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Joe Kennedy, Al Green, Judy Chu, Debbie Dingell, Niki Tsongas, John Conyers, José Serrano, Hank Johnson, and many others, House Resolution 569 condemns “violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.” The Resolution has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

That’s right: “violence, bigotry and hateful rhetoric.” The implications of those five words will fly by most people who read them, and the mainstream media, of course, will do nothing to elucidate them. But what H. Res. 569 does is conflate violence -- attacks on innocent civilians, which have no justification under any circumstances – with “bigotry” and “hateful rhetoric,” which are identified on the basis of subjective judgments. The inclusion of condemnations of “bigotry” and “hateful rhetoric” in this Resolution, while appearing to be high-minded, take on an ominous character when one recalls the fact that for years, Ellison, Carson, and his allies (including groups such as the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR) have been smearing any and all honest examination of how Islamic jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to incite hatred and violence as “bigotry” and “hateful rhetoric.” This Resolution is using the specter of violence against Muslims to try to quash legitimate research into the motives and goals of those who have vowed to destroy us, which will have the effect of allowing the jihad to advance unimpeded and unopposed.

That’s not what this H. Res. 569 would do, you say? It’s just about condemning “hate speech,” not free speech? That kind of sloppy reasoning may pass for thought on most campuses today, but there is really no excuse for it. Take, for example, the wife of Paris jihad murderer Samy Amimour – please. It was recently revealed that she happily boasted about his role in the murder of 130 Paris infidels: “I encouraged my husband to leave in order to terrorize the people of France who have so much blood on their hands […] I’m so proud of my husband and to boast about his virtue, ah la la, I am so happy.” Proud wifey added: “As long as you continue to offend Islam and Muslims, you will be potential targets, and not just cops and Jews but everyone.”

Now Samy Amimour’s wife sounds as if she would be very happy with H. Res. 569, and its sponsors would no doubt gladly avow that we should stop offending Islam and Muslims – that is, cut out the “bigotry” and “hateful rhetoric.” If we are going to be “potential targets” even if we’re not “cops” or “Jews,” as long as we “continue to offend Islam and Muslims,” then the obvious solution, according to the Western intelligentsia, is to stop doing anything that might offend Islam and Muslims – oh, and stop being cops and Jews. Barack “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam” says it. Hillary “We’re going to have that filmmaker arrested” Clinton says it. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, certain that anyone who speaks honestly about Islam and jihad is a continuing danger to the Church, says it.

And it should be easy. What offends Islam and Muslims? It ought to be a simple matter to cross those things off our list, right? Making a few sacrifices for the sake of our future of glorious diversity should be a no-brainer for every millennial, and everyone of every age who is concerned about “hate,” right? So let’s see. Drawing Muhammad – that’s right out. And of course, Christmas celebrations, officially banned this year in three Muslim countries and frowned upon (at best) in many others, will have to go as well. Alcohol and pork? Not in public, at least. Conversion from Islam to Christianity? No more of that. Building churches? Come on, you’ve got to be more multicultural!

Everyone agrees. The leaders of free societies are eagerly lining up to relinquish those freedoms. The glorious diversity of our multicultural future demands it. And that future will be grand indeed, a gorgeous mosaic, as everyone assures us, once those horrible “Islamophobes” are forcibly silenced. Everyone will applaud that. Most won’t even remember, once the jihad agenda becomes clear and undeniable to everyone in the U.S. on a daily basis and no one is able to say a single thing about it, that there used to be some people around who tried to warn them.

Dozens of Muslims in Wisconsin are reportedly now out of a job after officials at a lawn mower and snow blower manufacturing company changed its prayer policy to disallow prayer breaks other than at meals.

Ariens had previously allowed workers to walk away from the production line twice during a shift to offer up two of the five prayers that they are required to pray each day at specific times according to the Islamic religion. A co-worker could fill in for them during the five minutes that they were gone.

However, Ariens recently changed its policy to require employees to stay on the production line at all times, except for during their lunch break.

“We are asking employees to pray during scheduled breaks in our designated prayer rooms,” it said in a memo. “Our manufacturing environment does not allow for unscheduled breaks in production.”

Muslims state that the new policy violates their faith because now they will not be able to pray at the specific times required in Islam.

“If someone tells you, ‘You pray on your break,’ and the break time is not the prayer time, it will be impossible to pray,” Green Bay Masjid Imam Hasan Abdi explained to local television station WNCN.

“So they say, ‘If you don’t pray at the break time,’ they give us this [unemployment] paper to just leave,” former employee Ibrahim Mehemmed also told the outlet.

Connect with Christian News

Over 50 Ariens employees were affected by the decision, and according to reports, 10 so far have opted to stay and comply with the new rules.

“We are open to any of the employees returning to work under the new policy or will look for openings in shifts that do not coincide with prayer time,” President Dan Ariens said in a statement. “We respect their faith, and we respect their decision regardless of their choice to return to work or not.”

He said that the company has sought to understand Muslim practices and has not fired anyone over issue.

“Our staff is committed to providing a great place to work for all employees and have met with members of our Somalian employee group to better understand their needs. We consulted with local representatives who are of Muslim faith to help provide sustainable solutions,” Ariens said. “We want to be clear that no one was terminated here.”

The federal Equal Opportunity Commission outlines that “an employer does not have to accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs or practices if doing so would cause undue hardship to the employer,” resulting in “decreased efficiency” on the job.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is asking Ariens to allow employees to continue to leave the production line during the prayer times while a solution is reached.

“These types of accommodation disputes can be resolved in a spirit of respect for constitutionally-protected religious rights and for the legitimate needs of both employees and employers,” spokesman Ibrahim Hooper said in a press release.

Last month, 150 Muslims were fired from the Cargill meat plan in Colorado after they protested officials who made a similar decision to ban employees from leaving the production line. After not showing up for work for three days straight, they were terminated.

Parents were not informed in advance, and many were angry. Experts say that the hijab is actually not an Islamic requirement

Officials at the World [High] School of Inquiry in Rochester, New York, spent a week this month fielding dozens of calls from parents angry about a “World Hijab Day” event that encouraged girls to wear the Muslim religious head covering.

So reports EAGnews.org, the flagship website of Education Action Group Foundation, Inc.

The "Hijab Day" was held in the school on the first Friday of this month, at the request of a sophomore who wears a hijab every day. The principal approved the idea, and teachers brought in 150 scarves for female students to try on and wear for the day. Boys were given carnations to wear in solidarity.

Little did the principal realize, for some reason, the backlash the idea would cause.

“As a high school teacher for over 30 years, let me say that this is wrong on so many levels,” Jim Farnholz wrote on his Facebook page. He elaborated: "All religions are taught in our global studies classes. That being said, that is where understanding, tolerance and the good and bad of religion and history are taught. This, however, is a clear violation of separation of church and state.”

The student who initiated the project – originally from Yemen – said, “We wanted [the students] to experience it and feel how we feel… I just feel proud that I’m sharing my culture.”

Fear of legal repercussions, of course, had the final say. A school district spokesman said that when officials consulted with an attorney about the World Hijab Day event, they were advised that there would be legal issues if the school said no to the event.

The principal, Sheela Webster, was one of those who donned a hijab for the day. She insisted that the event was not religious, but rather cultural and experiential: "We are an experiential school; we engage kids in all kinds of activities and projects all of the time, so the perspective of being able to learn what a hijab is, why some women choose to wear it and why some women don’t choose to wear it…"

A Clarion Project report commented on this point: "Unfortunately, learning about 'why some women don’t choose to wear it' – or more pointedly, what happens to women in certain Muslim countries and societies who have no choice whether or not to wear it - was not part of the program."

Some Muslims have noted that there is a well-financed conservative effort within modern Islam to promulgate the idea that the hijab is a requirement of Islam – even though as recently as two or three decades ago, in many Islamic societies it was not. It is no longer uncommon to hear of "honor killings," both in the West and in Muslim countries, of Muslim women who did not don a hijab.

One offended Rochester school parent commented online on the hijab project, writing, “What lesson will they wear a Yarmulke in? Or the Christian cross? Or the Hindu turban?... Funny how it always seems to be the Muslims they learn about…"

Another commenter was more forthright: “How disgusting and irresponsible for any educator to encourage a child to wear a symbol of oppression, whether it be religious or cultural,” Rebecca Sluman wrote. And Rick Bentley added, "Don’t you kids dare wear a shirt with the American flag on it, someone WILL be offended."

UPDATE! Do These Maps Show The Coming 'End Of America'? Reports Of Danger At 'Wide Open Border' As Men Shout 'Allahu Akbar' And Some Religions Become 'Above The Law Of The Land' In America

UPDATE: CBS News LA confirms 17 men of Middle Eastern descent were arrested for firing off shots in the desert and chanting as shared in the 1st video below. They have since been released.

According to a story from Supreme Patriot who used a PBS story as their source, the Saint Cloud school district in the state of Minnesota has returned prayer to public schools. While many might think that this news is a great thing, we're also told the kicker: Prayer is returned to school for Muslims only. While some might think that is unfair, it's actually not according to the Houston branch Director of CAIR Mustafa Carrol who simply stated: "If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land."

As the map at the top of this story shows us, large parts of America now have a large percentage of immigrants living within their states. Is all of this MORE proof we are now beginning to witness the 'end of America' as we know it and the beginning of an America where certain groups hold rights not held by everyone else? Wouldn't that be strongly against the US Constitution? If we were parents living in St. Cloud, Minnesota, we'd be filing lawsuits right now against the school district if they're allowing Muslims to pray in school and Christians not to.

Buried deep in a PBS article about how the St. Cloud, Minn., school district is accommodating a large Somali population was a telling example of religious bias. While public schools have appropriately been barred from leading students in corporate Christian prayer, this district is going out of its way to satisfy the desires of the Muslim community.

“In the district’s middle and high schools,” the report stated, “Muslim students have access to private rooms with prayer rugs for the five daily prayers.”

The map seen at the top of this story shows the percentage share of the state population of immigrants to each US state and when compared with map below showing the same percentages for each state from the year 1970, we see why many Americans are deeply concerned as many states are now made up of between 20% and 40% immigrant with 1/3 of US states at a level of over 15%.

While we've always believed that LEGAL immigration is a great thing, and has helped to make America what we are today, we've long considered ILLEGAL immigration to be a huge crime itself upon our population and as we see in the 3rd video below, there is much evidence that we are now watching 'white genocide' unfolding.

We also take a look below at an alarming report out of the California dessert where what has been called a huge group of Middle Eastern men were recently arrested after firing guns into the air and allegedly calling out 'Allahu Akhbar' as also heard more in the 1st video below. In the 2nd video below, we learn about a 10-mile span along the US Mexico border that is remaining wide open, allowing anyone who wants to come in to come in.

According to the Washington Times story,

One third of the nation's 50 states now have immigrant populations over 15 percent, with six over 25 percent, raising new questions about the country's ability to absorb the immigrant flood in schools and the job market, a new report on government immigration data said.The new Center for Immigration Studies analysis of the 61 million immigrants and their children now in America revealed the speed at how the nation's population has changed since 1970.

According to interactive maps unveiled Monday by CIS, there were no states in 1970 that recorded immigrant populations over 15 percent. Today one third of the nation's states register over 15 percent immigrant: California, Nevada, Texas, Florida, New York, New Jersey, Washington, Arizona, Illinois, Maryland, Georgia, Virginia, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Delaware, and Oregon.

The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has called on Muslims to openly defy U.S. Customs Agents when questioned on travel from Islamic controlled countries by saying, “None of your Damn Business.”

Hassan Shibly (Executive Director CAIR, Florida) also encourages Muslims to agitate Customs Agents by saying Islamic prayers “very loudly” when questioned. Shibly also stated that he was, “Asked to do this by our friends from within the government.” Hassan Shibly was awarded by Nihad Awad (CAIR co-founder and National Executive Director) as “CAIR Chapter of the Year” in 2013.

CAIR’s open defiance of law enforcement has been well documented. In 2011 CAIR, California posted flyers on their website featuring a sinister looking FBI agent with the headlines, “Build a Wall of Resistance,” and “Don’t Talk to the FBI.”

In November 2014 the United Arab Emirates specifically listed CAIR as a “terrorist organization,” saying the group is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, promotes extremism and incites and finances terrorism, adding that it wears “a cloak of democracy and liberalism.”

In July 2014, Breitbart released a story showing video of Shibly’s CAIR, FL group sponsoring an pro HAMAS rally in Miami where members were chanting, “We are HAMAS. We are Jihad.”

The group of Muslims who attempted to establish the first Islamic Sharia court inside the United States in the town of Irving, Texas just received a devastating blow thanks to the town’s mayor standing strong and not backing down.

Mayor Beth Van Duyne made a public Facebook post stating that she backs the new Texas law which prohibits any kind of foreign law from being practiced in the state of Texas.

After calls, threats and toddler-like demands to apologize from the Muslims who attempted to form the Sharia tribunal along with representatives from the Council on Islamic-American Relations, a known front for the Muslim Brotherhood, the mayor never once backed down.

There were a multitude of illegal activities taking place behind the attempted formation of the Sharia court, including the fact that all four of the “voluntary” Sharia lawyers were not licensed to practice law in Texas — that’s a third degree felony.

The rules of the Sharia court had different guidelines for women and men, with typical Islamic humiliation tactics to be used against women, which is constitutionally illegal.

The Sharia court “lawyers” also conveniently failed to inform the city of Irving that they were operating a court inside of the town — again, illegal.

The mayor’s office responded to Zia Sheikh’s public hissy fit with a call for them to follow the Consitution and the American Laws for American Courts bill, which prohibits foreign law from being practiced in the state of Texas.

Their response was in typical radical Islamic fashion. “We don’t care about the bill. It’s not going to affect us in any way, shape or form. The bottom line is the foundation of this bill is anti-Islamic,” Sheikh said.

During the city vote to support the Texas bill, which passed by a 5-4 vote, members from CAIR were present, attempting to intimidate the crowd by alleging that the bill was “anti-Islamic” and used words like “bigotry” and “Islamophobia.” (H/T MadWorldNews)

The bill makes no specific reference to Islam or Sharia — it merely states that no foreign law is to be practiced in the state.

It should also be noted that one of the votes that opposed the bill was from a Muslim council member, who addressed his fellow Muslims in the room before casting his “no” vote in dramatic fashion.

We salute Mayor Van Duyne for staying strong in the face of threats and intimidation from the radical Islamic members of the Sharia court. Her efforts to stop this abomination will echo throughout the country, setting precedent for other cities and towns where Muslims attempt to establish footholds.

Share this on Facebook and Twitter if you support the mayor’s efforts to put a screeching halt to the formation of illegal Sharia courts in her Texas town.