Forwarding to the comment list to archive.
>Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:39:39 -0700
>From: Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>
>Subject: further comments on XPointer EDITOR'S COPY
>To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
>============================================================================
>
>element()
>
>2 Conformance
>
>para 2
> You can delete this whole paragraph, since it's implied by the normative
> dependence on the Framework spec. If you want to retain it, you should
> at least delete the word "normatively", for the same reason you deleted
> it from the corresponding para in the Framework spec.
>
>3 Language and Processing
>
>para 2
>"does not return a subresource."
> Change "return" to "identify".
>
>syntax
> Use initial capitals for both symbols.
> Use camel case for both symbols.
> i.e.: "ElementSchemeData" and "ChildSeq"
>
>para 4
>"exactly as for the Name shorthand form defined in the XPointer Framework
>[XPtrFrame] specification"
> The Framework spec doesn't call it "the Name shorthand form". How about:
> "exactly as it would in a shorthand pointer, as defined in ..."
>
>"failure to identify a subresource"
> Change "a subresource" to "an element", which ties it back to "a single
> element" earlier in the sentence.
>
>"no subresource being returned"
> Change "returned" to "identifed by the pointer part,".
>
>============================================================================