Part of the magic that makes life so sweet is contained inside the circular pastries we lovingly refer to as donuts. The Friday Donut Club was founded in June of 2004 and is made-up of a rotation of folks who bring donuts in every Friday. We have three simple rules: (1) four dozen (2) boutique shop donuts (3) by 8:00 am. This blog captures the e-mails sent to club members every Friday morning to remind them donuts are here. Have a happy Friday!

Search This Blog

Donuts Arrived, Consume Avidly (DACA)

Sorry for such a long-winded and weighty note on a donut
Friday. As an Immigrant, I may be overly-sensitive to the current immigration
debate, recently fueled by President Trump’s ending of DACA, so I felt compelled
to get my thoughts out there. I won’t dwell on technicalities (i.e. whether the
executive branch has the authority to implement a policy that contravenes the legislative
framework we live under) and will forgo the “dreamers are a sympathetic group” window
dressing. I will focus, instead, on trying to debunk some of the misconceptions
and myths that seem to be the basis for our inability to pass comprehensive,
humane immigration reform. I respectfully submit these views as my own and I understand
reasonable people can see things from different perspectives. I don’t expect
anyone else to agree with me and I certainly won’t count it against you if you
don’t.

As I see it, there are five fallacies that anchor the views
of those who would oppose changing the status quo in the direction of more
reasonable and accessible immigration policies.

Fallacy 1: Jobs are scarce. When we
imagine there are only so many jobs the economy can support, competing for
these jobs seems like a zero-sum game. The reality is more complex and
nuanced. For starters, people who work buy stuff, which generates jobs. An
aging population has more retirees leaving the workforce, and, people who
have done well financially may also choose not to work. Furthermore, not
all jobs require the same skills (e.g. I’d make a terrible orange harvester).
In the past 16 years, the number of employed people in our economy has
grown by 8.7 million and the unemployment rate (the percentage of people who are
looking for jobs but can’t find them) has hovered within historically “normal”
parameters (between 4% and 10%) and is currently on the low end of that range.
Granted, many people have exited the labor force (they are not considered
unemployed because they are not looking for jobs) –like I said, it’s
complicated, but in general the more people who want to work, the more
jobs there are likely to be.

Fallacy 2: Handouts are many. People,
no matter where they come from, prefer to be self-sufficient. Most folks
would rather work than depend on the government for cheese. Our social
safety-net (Medicaid, food stamps, WIC, Chip, etc.) is designed to prevent
people who have fallen on hard times from falling through the cracks. Sure,
folks who come to the U.S. from other countries are more likely to need a hand
while “learning the ropes” of living in a new country and getting settled
(and some immigrants may abuse the system, much like some U.S. citizens
abuse the system). However, even if immigrants have a disproportionate
need for entitlement programs, on the whole, their marginal contribution
to our economy (not to mention our society) is greater than any draw they
may have on these resources.

Fallacy 3: Floodgates will open. This
variant of the Slippery Slope logical fallacy goes something like this: If
we grant an amnesty, it will provide an incentive for more people to cross
our borders illegally. This ethnocentric view of the world sees the U.S.
as a bastion of plenty and the rest of the world as the backwaters, a
place folks wish to escape the first chance they get. It completely
ignores the fact most people would rather remain in the familiar territory
they know and love near friends, family and a support network. People
looking to cross the border without a permit don’t pause to consider whether
a legal precedent makes it more or less likely they will eventually be
granted citizenship before deciding to migrate. They weigh their safety
and economic prospects before making the terrible choice to embark in an
often treacherous journey. Amnesty or lack thereof has little, if any,
bearing on this decision.

Fallacy 4: Isis, Drugs and Bad Hombres.
Another scare tactic used is the argument that bad things come from
abroad. Fear is a powerful motivator and it is easy to fear that which we
do not know. Folks who are different than us can seem scary and make us
feel unsafe. To those who would use this argument, let me say, national
origin does not make a person good or bad. Furthermore a humane
immigration policy is not inconsistent with background checks and it provides
an opportunity to do reasonable due-diligence on folks –which is likely to
skew the balance towards law abiding citizens. Will immigrants commit
crimes? Of course they will! Will their crime rates be disproportionately
higher than native U.S. citizens? No. If anything, the screening process
will likely make them lower. As for drugs and Isis, people who intend to
do harm will find a way to do so with utter disregard for any law we may pass.

Fallacy 5: We are American. Those
who believe our identity as a nation should be cast in concrete, put on a
shelve and indelibly memorialized for all time worry about new blood
changing things –without realizing change is an inevitable constant. Most
of us wouldn’t be here if a xenophobic anti-immigration policy would have
been established 525 years ago. According to the results of a test I recently
purchased, <2 -and="" a="" americas="" and="" been="" comes="" continent="" dna="" established="" family="" for="" from="" generations="" has="" hypocritical="" immigrants="" is="" it="" latest="" more="" my="" nation="" o:p="" of="" on="" several="" shut-out="" states="" the="" this="" to="" united="" wave.="">2>

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Friends,
I’m trying to maximize the time I spend with friends and
family while in Ecuador. My dad had nine siblings, my wife’s dad 15. As you
might imagine, my cousins and their families are fairly numerous (despite the
fact five of my dad’s brothers didn’t marry or have children). Then there’s my
wife’s family and my childhood friends. Needless to say, there is never enough
time to see everyone, despite a valiant effort. Of course, I’m also working
from “home”. Corny as it may sound, working half a world away, I realize I miss
my Windstream “family” and I look forward to seeing you soon. In the meantime,
there are donuts, here today courtesy of John Huddleston. So, enjoy some
comfort food with regards from my Cuenca family (pictured) to you!

Friends,
For this holiday, I decided to take advantage of the
ridiculously cheap travel airlines afford parents of employees who choose to
fly standby (i.e. yours truly). The way I saw it, this is low season for
International travel, so flying to Ecuador would not be an issue. I would fly
to Houston on Monday’s first flight out, spend the day working from the airport
and travel to Ecuador at 6:30 PM. As for the Thanksgiving rush on the domestic
leg, even if it was tight, people always oversleep and miss early trips.
Besides, I can always catch the next flight. Right? I woke at 3 AM, and after a
nice breakfast at the airport made my way to the gate. 5:39 AM flight sold-out
and I was 11th on the standby list. 7:53 AM full, 7th on standby. 10:03 AM
full, 13th on standby. 12:30 PM full, 9th on standby. 2:05 PM, the last
possible flight if I’m to make my connection, full and I’m 11th on standby. I
explain my situation to the kind lady and ask if there is any way to pay more
to move-up on t…

Friends,
As a whiteperson of color, I’ve always been somewhat irked
by the compulsion to categorize people into neat boxes. Most people don’t fit
neatly into boxes. When given a choice between “white” or “Hispanic” (check
one), I realized these boxes provide a false choice. Why does the
government care what category I opt into? The way I see it, these questions on
so many forms probably don’t cause division and social injustice, but they do
keep the conversation going. I propose a write-in campaign (similar to elections).
Most of these forms now contain an “Other” field where you can write-in your
ethnic or racial background. What if we all wrote-in “Transracial”. If one or
two of us do it, no big deal. If it catches-on, maybe someone will take notice
and report on how silly this categorization variable is. Speaking of boxes, a
dozen donut box is sitting in its usual spot, so come get your transracial self some sugar!
Happy Friday!