I hope you don't think you're correcting me, I didn't write the stupid thing. When you say the form "yours" does not exist in Portuguese, you must be thinking I wrote it but I'm doing a translation of somebody else's messages, obviously.
Anyway nobody is addressing the only interesting issue, namely that the author has a woman's name and signs "seu boiola".

It appears to me that the woman is dissatisfied with the man, vis-à-vis sexual performance or she is asserting a kind of active, nay, nymphomaniac sexual ethos to their relationship. She sends him spicy photos of naked women to arouse/defy him and she calls him a faggot, to make him feel the need to prove his prowess to her.

It appears to me that the woman is dissatisfied with the man, vis-à-vis sexual performance or she is asserting a kind of active, nay, nymphomaniac sexual ethos to their relationship. She sends him spicy photos of naked women to arouse/defy him and she calls him a faggot, to make him feel the need to prove his prowess to her.

Click to expand...

Maybe you missed the context but I don't see any evidence of dissatisfaction at all. And I think it's quite possible that the "woman" is not really a woman at all:

First of all, is "boiloa" a typo of yours? Or is it written exactly like this on the letter?
This "boiloa" doesn't mean anything, as far as I know, much like it would be in English "fattog". The correct word is "boiola" (=faggot).

My conclusion with only this piece of evidence:
If the woman's name is not "boiola" ["Boiola" is not a female proper name. Well, anything's possible but that's not usually the case] , and it's another female name written there, then I think it's a letter from a woman (real woman) to a man. But she's calling him a faggot and showing him some spicy photos of "bucetas", just like mglenadel pointed out.

First of all, is "boiloa" a typo of yours? Or is it written exactly like this on the letter?
This "boiloa" doesn't mean anything, as far as I know, much like it would be in English "fattog". The correct word is "boiola" (=faggot).

My conclusion with only this piece of evidence:
If the woman's name is not "boiola" ["Boiola" is not a female proper name. Well, anything's possible but that's not usually the case] , and it's another female name written there, then I think it's a letter from a woman (real woman) to a man. But she's calling him a faggot and showing him some spicy photos of "bucetas", just like mglenadel pointed out.

Click to expand...

That's obviously a typo, "boiola" is the correct word and I even posted a whole separate thread on the subject (which is really where this term should be discussed"). I don't see how you can be so sure that it's not a male homosexual using a woman's name. That is very common practice and it might even be a transsexual. In any case, if you read the context the author is obviously extremely turned on and in love with the recipient, so why would she call him a faggot? On the other hand, if they were both homosexual lovers and the author signs "your little faggot' there would be no contradiction at all. I seriously doubt that a woman would show her lover photos of other women's vaginas to turn him on, at least I've never run across that kind of woman before.
And it wasn't mglenadel who point out the idea about photos, that was my idea, if you read the thread.

I seriously doubt that a woman would show her lover photos of other women's vaginas to turn him on, at least I've never run across that kind of woman before.

Click to expand...

I find it less likely that a male homosexual would send another man pictures of vaginas to turn him on. After the Weiner debacle, I'm sure the whole world is well aware of what men think turns other people on.

She might do it as a put-down, if the "extreme turn-on" was feigned, and she just meant to humiliate him..

Click to expand...

That's a overly complex interpretation as opposed to "your little faggot", which is very simple and fits well. Anyway, don't you think it a bit odd that the author would decide to call the addressee "You little faggot" at the end of the message precisely where people usually write the "yours truly", etc.?

I find it less likely that a male homosexual would send another man pictures of vaginas to turn him on. After the Weiner debacle, I'm sure the whole world is well aware of what men think turns other people on.

Click to expand...

That's why I asked whether "buceta" could have another meaning in homosexual slang by extension (functional or formal similarity: blow-job or anus, in the role of surrogate vaginas). Anyway, photos of vaginas per se are relatively rare in pornography, probably accounting for fewer 1 out of 1,000 porno pictures if you take a random sample on the internet.

That's a overly complex interpretation as opposed to "your little faggot", which is very simple and fits well. Anyway, don't you think it a bit odd that the author would decide to call the addressee "You little faggot" at the end of the message precisely where people usually write the "yours truly", etc.?

Click to expand...

Not so odd if the author of the e-mail is indeed a woman fooling around with the addressee. (And it could even be friendly banter, rather than a put-down...)

But there's really no way of knowing what's going on without further information. We could keep guessing forever.

As I explicitly said at the beginning, I don't know the context, otherwise I wouldn't be asking at all.
That's a overly complex interpretation as opposed to "your little faggot", which is very simple and fits well. Anyway, don't you think it a bit odd that the author would decide to call the addressee "You little faggot" at the end of the message precisely where people usually write the "yours truly", etc.?

That's why I asked whether "buceta" could have another meaning in homosexual slang by extension (functional or formal similarity: blow-job or anus, in the role of surrogate vaginas). Anyway, photos of vaginas per se are relatively rare in pornography, probably accounting for fewer 1 out of 1,000 porno pictures if you take a random sample on the internet.

I don't think of it as an abstract theme to be refuted but as a specific, concrete task: to translate the message correctly by understanding the context (lesbians, homosexual men, heterosexual couple, etc.) You must be right that "seu boiola" means "you faggot" instead of "your faggot" but that by no means confirms the simplistic assumption that the author is woman because "she" has a woman's name is a woman, nor does it resolve any of the fundamental questions regarding the identities and relationship of the people involved.

Anaccz's contribution ("bucetas", não está necessariamente falando sobre vaginas, o mais provável é estar se referindo a mulheres( is very helpful because it shows that "bucetas" could be mean "photos of other fags/she-males", which would make a lot more sense in a conversation between homosexuals.

I didn't mean we had to identify the people by name, which would be impossible anyway. I just mean that I you can't translate it well without understanding who is talking to whom and what kind of relationship they have (especially to figure out what kind of pictures they're showing).

I disagree, William. If you translate the sentences you posted faithfully, not a word would change either way. I don't even see the need for footnotes, since bocetas will mean women by synecdoche in both cases, and boiola is faggot. That's why I said translations are straighforward here.

Because that's part of talking dirty, just like there are lots of girls here who like you to call them "perrita sucia" during sex although it's normally offensive. Anyway, even it means "you faggot", it still doesn't have to be a woman addressing a man but any combination.

Why does it matter? Because of the content of the pictures. I really don't think it means "photos of pussies", because in English at least that would really mean close-up photos of vaginas and it just doesn't strike me as plausible.

Homosexual men who play the female role refer to themselves as women in every way. I don't know really know what it's in the pictures so I didn't want to make it too explicit. I don't see why it's so probable that the pictures are of other women, in fact I think it's unlikely for the reasons I mentioned. I told the agency there wasn't enough context to be certain of anything and that I was just guessing, so it's not my fault. In any case I find it amazing how people can take something with thousands of possibilities and claim that it's simple and easy to understand.

Because that's part of talking dirty, just like there are lots of girls here who like you to call them "perrita sucia" during sex although it's normally offensive. Anyway, even it means "you faggot", it still doesn't have to be a woman addressing a man but any combination.

Why does it matter? Because of the content of the pictures. I really don't think it means "photos of pussies", because in English at least that would really mean close-up photos of vaginas and it just doesn't strike me as plausible.

I posted a new question on "bokete" with more context because this is getting too speculative. As I said in the new post, I think this probably some kind of porn e-group or porn website where the people don't really know each other. It sounds like the photos might be of women giving blow jobs or maybe lesbians as Ana said, but I still doubt that they're "pussy shots".