On different note, does the ACT court system really move this slowly? The incident happened in 2007, proceedings commenced in Dec 2008, a revised statement of claims lodged in July 2010, hearings were held in June and Sept 2011 and a judgement delivered in Dec 2013.

I admit I don’t know the workings of the legal system, but even taking into account a few adjournments/postponements, surely it shouldn’t take 5 years from a commencement of proceedings to date of judgement.

Wow, it is a sad outcome indeed. So she left the door open even, they went to adult stores together and she kept leaning over to kiss him? Well now his life is ruined, the only thing is – as an EL2 he definitely shouldn’t have been going there. I think this meme applies here:

Its still not an offence to drive your heard of sheep over the Sydney harbour bridge. There is many ludicrous phenomena to be found in the legal system. The above doesn’t really stand out as a good example though. Sad? Perhaps. A common avenue taken after criminal proceedings don’t stick? Very.

It certainly comes off that the guy is an arsehole, and I dare say that had the verdict gone the other way she would probably try to top herself again, but based upon my reading in full of the judgement I don’t see this as a fair outcome. In regards to the quality of evidence, I can see where details would be left out by the defendant like the blood on the workcover statement. The plaintiff has run through the events over and over again in her head and appeared to be beating herself up over the way she acted, rather than what actually happened.

What shocks me about this though is the nonsense that goes on in contracting circles, for a start why on earth should he govt be covering the cost of an industry conference for contractors…it’s up to them to maintain their skills and be across industry developments.

It’s very clear from the judgement that there’s a very vulnerable individual involved here, so you should perhaps be taking that into account. From where you or I sit, this joke could be funny. But someone in the middle of the trauma of being discussed online in this horrible context could take it very badly.

Yeah, somebody so vulnerable she’d managed to be promoted to EL, then milked the whole stress-leave malarkey to the max.

Together with her psycho supervisor, the pair of them demonstrate quite clearly that the public service is a sheltered workshop for people who could never operate succesfully in the real world.

It’s very clear from the judgement that there’s a very vulnerable individual involved here, so you should perhaps be taking that into account. From where you or I sit, this joke could be funny. But someone in the middle of the trauma of being discussed online in this horrible context could take it very badly.

I think it’s sad that this woman is being violated all over again with her private details being discussed in a public forum. I hope her solicitor made her aware that the judgement would be made public.

It’s very clear from the judgement that there’s a very vulnerable individual involved here, so you should perhaps be taking that into account. From where you or I sit, this joke could be funny. But someone in the middle of the trauma of being discussed online in this horrible context could take it very badly.

It’s very clear from the judgement that there’s a very vulnerable individual involved here, so you should perhaps be taking that into account. From where you or I sit, this joke could be funny. But someone in the middle of the trauma of being discussed online in this horrible context could take it very badly.

It’s very clear from the judgement that there’s a very vulnerable individual involved here, so you should perhaps be taking that into account. From where you or I sit, this joke could be funny. But someone in the middle of the trauma of being discussed online in this horrible context could take it very badly.