Perrins: Timing may have soured school divisions to changes in Education Act

The man who compiled Saskatchewan’s K-12 governance review says it’s “quite possible” changes to the province’s Education Act may have got a warmer reception from education stakeholders if they had been rolled out separately from a tough budget.

Because the changes came just days after the budget, school divisions have soured on potential shifts after at first showing what the government called “significant support” for them.

“It seems to have created a much different climate now,” said Dan Perrins, who wrote the Education Governance Review, parts of which were cited as the basis for the changes.

While it’s up to the government when to change the legislation, “the decision to attach it to the budget has clearly impacted the receptivity … school boards appeared to have had previously,” Perrins said.

If passed, Bill 63, The Education Amendment Act, would give the education minister more control over school board spending. It has been criticized by the Saskatchewan School Boards’ Association, which represents the province’s 28 divisions.

Education Minister Don Morgan, who recently entertained the idea of pulling back on the changes, originally noted the amendments’ purpose was to help ensure divisions make the best fiscal choices.

In a release, Morgan said the six-person advisory panel heard “a clear need to ensure school divisions are being as efficient and effective as possible with the resources that are available.”

The consultations included meetings with 45 stakeholder groups and feedback from 4,000 online submissions.

Perrins said while he understands the government wanted to act quickly to bring legislation to the floor — the bill went for its second reading on April 12 — it may have been better for the government to wait before asking so much of divisions, since it has created atmosphere that makes it “really difficult” for the two groups to work together.

Last week, the SSBA said it wasn’t properly consulted and called on parents to speak out against the amendments on social media and to their elected officials.

“All we’re asking for is to be involved to ensure the law that governs education is appropriate for school division governance,” SSBA president Shawn Davison told reporters earlier this month.

“Essentially, the act has preserved elected boards as existing; what it has not preserved is the responsibilities of those elected boards.”

Greater Saskatoon Catholic Schools board chair Diane Boyko said the changes may result in boards being “stripped of the autonomy,” while the government makes local spending decisions.

“My fellow trustees and I believe that boards should continue to be your voice for education, not the face of education,” Boyko said in a post to parents and guardians on the division’s website.

“We ask that you once again add your voice — stand up for education in your community and stop Bill 63. Don’t leave it up to the government and the Minister of Education to make decisions that directly affect your school, your classroom, your students.”

Ray Morrison, who chaired the panel that held consultations on Perrins’ report, said Perrins raised a fair perspective.

“The speed at which all of this has happened I think caught everyone by surprise,” he said.

Morrison noted the consultations found broad consensus that the status quo wasn’t sustainable, as it led to boards being at odds with the province.

“I would hope that everybody keeps that in mind as we move forward and try to work our way through this little bit of tug of war that’s going on right now,” he said.

In response to a request for an interview with Morgan, the education ministry instead issued a prepared statement saying it “has been in regular contact with the Saskatchewan School Boards Association (SSBA) and will continue working with them to address the concerns that have been raised.”

“The regulations have not yet been written and will be drafted with input from the education sector, including the SSBA,” the statement added.

Comments

We encourage all readers to share their views on our articles and blog posts. We are committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion, so we ask you to avoid personal attacks, and please keep your comments relevant and respectful. If you encounter a comment that is abusive, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report spam or abuse. We are using Facebook commenting. Visit our FAQ page for more information.

Share

Perrins: Timing may have soured school divisions to changes in Education Act

Almost Done!

Postmedia wants to improve your reading experience as well as share the best deals and promotions from our advertisers with you. The information below will be used to optimize the content and make ads across the network more relevant to you. You can always change the information you share with us by editing your profile.

By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.

I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. I consent to the collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure of my information in accordance with the Postmedia's Privacy Policy.

Postmedia wants to improve your reading experience as well as share the best deals and promotions from our advertisers with you. The information below will be used to optimize the content and make ads across the network more relevant to you. You can always change the information you share with us by editing your profile.

By clicking "Create Account", I hearby grant permission to Postmedia to use my account information to create my account.

I also accept and agree to be bound by Postmedia's Terms and Conditions with respect to my use of the Site and I have read and understand Postmedia's Privacy Statement. I consent to the collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure of my information in accordance with the Postmedia's Privacy Policy.