Will Kim leave Canada today?

Heather Hiscox: The first female war resister in Canada is scheduled to be deported today but there's still a last gasp effort underway to keep the US Army Private in this country and some well known people are rallying behind her. Michael Serapio has the details. Michael, this deportation order looming for Kimberly Rivera?Michael Serapio: That's right Kimberly is an America, you see here in the photo and also in this video here. Now Kimberly Rivera, we should point out, is originally from Texas and when she was 24-years-old, she joined the US Army. Now this was in the wake of 9-11. And she joined the US Army thinking she could help make the United States a safer place. She was -- after enlisting -- deployed to Iraq and to Baghdad and after serving time there and spending more and more time there, she -- It occurred to her that the casualties were really mounting in terms of civilian death numbers and so she figured she could no longer fight this war with any conscience so she, in 2007, came to Canada. She came as a conscientious objector, asking to stay in Canada on humanitarian grounds. And after a number of years of fighting back and forth, the Immigration Ministry has decided to deny her request to stay in this country and it is that denial of application that has led to the protests that we've seen in the last 24 hours trying to maybe have some kind of an 11th hour rescue for Kim Rivera. Now we should point out that she has been ordered to leave Canada today. She says that she and her family will comply. This despite that Parliament has twice voted to allow War Resisters like her to stay in Canada and despite human rights activists -- some fairly famous ones -- advocating on her behalf, including the Bishop Desmond Tutu out of South Africa. Take a listen to what he has to say about Kim Rivera: "The deportation order given to Ms. Rivera is unjust and must be challenged. It's in times when people are swept up in a frenzy of war that it's most important to listen to the quiet voices speaking the truth. Isn't it time we begin to redress the atrocity of this war by honouring those such as Ms. Rivera who had the courage to stand against it at such a cost to themselves?" But despite that, Heather, she will be deported today.Heather Hiscox: Yeah, interesting to read the words of the government saying it doesn't consider these to be international -- like not genuinely refugees under the internationally accepted meaning of the term. So it looks like this will go ahead despite these high profile supporters. What will happen to her, Michael, when she return to the US?Michael Serapio: Well there is a group called War Resisters Canada that have been rallying not only for Kim Rivera but for other American soldiers that came here as conscientious objectors. They note that the last two Americans sent to the United States were both given prison sentences. In Kim Rivera's case, they expect her to be court-martialed, to spend at least one year in prison. And she says the hardest part of it is the separation she will face -- separation from her family, not only her husband but her four children, as you see here in this photo, two of whom were born right here in Canada. The Record reports on a protest in Waterloo, outside Canadian MP Peter Brand's office, by supporters of Kimberly Rivera (below), Iraq War veteran and US war resister. Historians Against the War's Luke Stewart explains, "We're here basically demanding that Kim Rivera be granted permanent residency in Canada. I think war is itself a crime unless it's in self-defence. I think Kim is someone we should be giving the Order of Canada to."

While Rivera expected to spend her time unloading equipment at a
Colorado base she soon found herself guarding a foreign operating base
in Iraq. It was from this vantage point that she became disillusioned
with the war. Riviera was troubled by a two-year-old Iraqi girl who came
to the base with her family to claim compensation after a bombing by
U.S. forces. “She was just petrified”, Rivera explained. “She was
crying, but there was no sound, just tears flowing out of her eyes. She
was shaking. I have no idea what had happened in her little life. All I
know is I wasn’t seeing her: I was seeing my own little girl. I could
imagine my daughter being one of those kids throwing rocks at soldiers,
because maybe someone she loved had been killed. That Iraqi girl haunts
my soul.’”Rivera had begun to empathize with the millions of Iraqis displaced by
the war or whose families lost a loved one. On leave in the U.S. a few
months later, Rivera was told she would be re-deployed overseas. Not
wanting to participate in a war she now opposed and fearing that her
young children might grow up without a mother, she fled north. In
February 2007 Rivera and her family applied for refugee status in this
country.

Kim and her family went to Canada. That's where they've made their home. She and her husband arrived with two children, they had two more, the youngest is 18-months-old Gabriel. Canada is her children's home but the Stephen Harper government is forcing her out of the country. The government is supposed to help families and keep them safe. Someone might want to ask Prime Minister Stephen Harper how he thinks his actions accomplish that.

Support rallies took place around Canada. The Canadian Press notes of the Toronto rally, "Wednesday evening's rally in Toronto also attracted faith groups, local activist organizations and veteran associations. David Milne, a member of Christian Peacemaker Teams, said he attended
the protest because he had witnessed the brutality of war in three trips
to Iraq." Miles Howe (Halifax Media Co-op) covers the Halifax demonstration and notes, "The contingent had gathered over 200 signatures from Nova Scotia
supporters of Rivera and her quest to remain in Canada, where she has
resided since 2007 with her husband and four children, the two youngest
of whom were born in Canada. Rivera, who signed up for the United States
military when she was 24, has built a life with her family in Canada.
She has been an active member in her community, doing volunteer work and
educating others about the Iraq War."

About Me

We do not open attachments. Stop e-mailing them. Threats and abusive e-mail are not covered by any privacy rule. This isn't to the reporters at a certain paper (keep 'em coming, they are funny). This is for the likes of failed comics who think they can threaten via e-mails and then whine, "E-mails are supposed to be private." E-mail threats will be turned over to the FBI and they will be noted here with the names and anything I feel like quoting.
This also applies to anyone writing to complain about a friend of mine. That's not why the public account exists.