What
about the other side of the questions surrounding the use and abuse
of all illegal-weapons? Drones have been cleared to track and destroy
anyone with a weapon. What about ILLEGAL-WEAPONS in the hands of
criminals—especially when they are detected inside

The
GUN-FREE ZONES of USI?

It
is clearly a fact that wherever GUN-FREE-ZONES
are located n cities like Chicago, New York, or in thousands of
municipalities and privately owned areas ­ where the murder rates
have skyrocketed. Why then has the government not chosen to use their
30,000 drones to go after and kill illegal-aliens, gang-members or
criminal activity in general?

Apparently
our still-unindicted Attorney-General, who is guilty of crimes
against humanity, has defended the drone-policies of the current
criminal-administration.

“Although it was
heralded as a clear signal that the Obama administration has been
forced to acknowledge that it cannot drone strike Americans on U.S.
soil, Eric Holder’s response to Rand Paul only serves to re-affirm
the government’s existing position.

Responding to the
Kentucky Senator’s near 13 hour filibuster, Attorney General Holder
sent a letter to Paul’s office which stated, “It has come to my
attention that you have now asked an additional question: `Does the
President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an
American not engaged in combat on American soil?’ The answer to
that question is no.”

The key to this is
the phrase “engaged in combat.” What does the administration
consider to represent an act of “combat.” (1)

Why
is the use of Drones to hunt down and kill gang-members or criminals
never mentioned? It is clear that anyone using an illegal weapon is
most likely a criminal and capable of murder. Yet equally the above
categories of criminals will never become targets for the still
questionable but deadly-drones that are now loose in the skies over
the USA?

Feinstein,
Bloomberg, Biden, Obama, Boxer, Pelosi and other Israeli-Firster’s
have all demanded that America be completely Disarmed—despite the
death-confirming crime-rates in every city that has chosen to
totally-disarm its legal-citizens?

The
reasons are clear: Current-Drones along with the 70,000 more that are
coming are to be used only against legal gun-owners and law-abiding
citizens. These drones will never be used to combat crime,
illegal-drug or gun-running, or government illegalities wherever they
occur.

Don’t
take my word for anything Ask the idiot-criminals in political
offices all across the land about this clearly
obscene policy.
USI policies will not just further endanger lawful citizens
everywhere: They will actually protect the growing number of
criminals that are driving up the real crime rate all over the USA
today, while they are being protected by the USI WAR-machine.

What
if privately-owned drones were to begin to locate and eliminate the
government control centers that operate these 30,000 hunter-killer
drones, whose only function is to terrify or kill lawful US citizens?

Ah
but I forgot: It is AGAINST
THE LAW
for anyone to protect themselves from anything in America—but
especially from this three-headed mechanical-Cerberus (THE
DRONES)
anywhere inside the FATHERLAND of the Fourth Reich; formerly known as
the United States of America.