Large segment on an Asia region blatant botter that was reported by another player only to be thus far ignored by the Asia moderators. The inference pointed out by Jingles is that while blatant because the botter has bought several premium tanks WG are reluctant to ban a clear violation of the rules.

What do moderators have to do with this?

The Dude abides.

Spoiler

Marvin: "And then of course I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left side."Arthur: "Is that so?"Marvin: "Oh yes. I mean I've asked for them to be replaced, but no one ever listens."Arthur: "I can imagine"Douglas Adams The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Hes an amateur. The player leading the weekly leaderboard of games played has averaged a game every 6.43 minutes for the last week. Recruitment officer for his clan too. All perfectly legal and no bottling either I spose. Wouldn’t alarm bells start ringing when this amount of games is played or are they just after the money and don’t care?

Large segment on an Asia region blatant botter that was reported by another player only to be thus far ignored by the Asia moderators. The inference pointed out by Jingles is that while blatant because the botter has bought several premium tanks WG are reluctant to ban a clear violation of the rules.

FWIW Jingles is wrong on account sharing, there is no rule against it, only the advice that the onus is on the account owner for any actions taken by anyone they have shared the account credentials with.

The Dude abides.

Spoiler

Marvin: "And then of course I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left side."Arthur: "Is that so?"Marvin: "Oh yes. I mean I've asked for them to be replaced, but no one ever listens."Arthur: "I can imagine"Douglas Adams The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

FWIW Jingles is wrong on account sharing, there is no rule against it, only the advice that the onus is on the account owner for any actions taken by anyone they have shared the account credentials with.

I noted that too, but to fair (unless policy has changed elsewhere), this is ONLY permitted for our server (due to the predominance of netcafes, bangs, etc. in Asia), so it's an easy mistake to make.

I did not say forum moderators, I referred to the people that moderate the game.

Then you have the wrong term, we are the moderators of the forums and ingame communications. Wargaming have Game Masters, Admins, Devs, Producers etc.,

The Dude abides.

Spoiler

Marvin: "And then of course I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left side."Arthur: "Is that so?"Marvin: "Oh yes. I mean I've asked for them to be replaced, but no one ever listens."Arthur: "I can imagine"Douglas Adams The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

True, but the daily/weekly games played numbers would be an easy point to start you would think? Check out the top ten each week and see if further action was needed?

Or I am I being too optimistic?

At one point we managed to keep a thread up for a little while listing off 'the most dedicated players' using that data. It was all about heaping praise on these people. Sadly the mods felt that may not have been the only intention of the thread and it got canned.

Who the [edited] are you? Get Spoofed! "wouldn't be a proper WG balance change if they didn't [edited] something up after all "

>9000 cynicism brought to you by P2W, RIP Balance and the Cartoon Connection

At one point we managed to keep a thread up for a little while listing off 'the most dedicated players' using that data. It was all about heaping praise on these people. Sadly the mods felt that may not have been the only intention of the thread and it got canned.

Always such a negative bunch, seeing the worst of intentions in everyone's actions. I recommend a dose of Pony Positivity.