NPR Story

5:03 pm

Thu May 9, 2013

In Newsrooms, Some Immigration Terms Are Going Out Of Style

Protesters demonstrate in downtown Orlando, Fla., on May 1, 2006. Most news outlets have long abandoned the use of the term "illegals."

Roberto SchmidtAFP/Getty Images

Journalists make choices all the time that influence our understanding of the news — the choice of what stories to cover, which people to interview, which words to use. And major news organizations have been reconsidering how best to describe a group of people whose very presence in this country breaks immigration law.

News organizations as institutions often decide which terms to use in describing contentious subjects, then codify them in what are called stylebooks. They are subject to change just as society's views change. Just consider terms used to describe race in this country.

"It goes back to the Garden of Eden," says former New York Times and Washington Post reporter Roberto Suro. "Naming is the first power that humans got and it's still the most powerful that the human intellect received from its creator."

Now a scholar at the University of Southern California, Suro says that when it comes to describing people who are in this country illegally, the media are reflecting the times.

"News organizations are kind of struggling. I believe they are reflecting what's happening in society, where what we see in the political arena is a society that's trying to sort out how to think about these people and where they belong in our society."

Moving Toward A Fuller Description

As Congress debates the merits of creating a quicker means for people here illegally to obtain citizenship, several major news outlets have shifted their policies. In April, the Associated Press decided the word "illegal" should only be used to describe actions, not people — the issue of illegal immigration, rather than illegal immigrants.

At the Los Angeles Times, Assistant Managing Editor Henry Fuhrmann noticed reporters were writing articles where they did not use the term "illegal immigrant" even though it was preferred.

Fuhrmann oversees standards as well as the paper's copy editing desk, which enforces those standards.

"I thought we either had to affirm our style and try to apply it more regularly or in fact listen to the voice of the newsroom as we're listening to the voices outside the newsroom and say maybe it was time for a fresh start."

Fuhrmann himself is the son of an American father and a Japanese mother. He was born in Japan while his father served in the Navy, and years after moving to the U.S. his mother became a naturalized citizen. He recalls asking one reporter which terms he used in his coverage.

"He found, to his surprise, that he would use 'illegal immigrant' if he was talking to, say, advocates of, say, stricter border control and he would use 'undocumented immigrant' if he was talking more to those being described."

The Los Angeles Times changed its policy, dropping both "illegal immigrants" and "undocumented immigrants" for a fuller description of those people. The New York Times has not abandoned "illegal immigrant" but encourages deeper characterization — a position shared by NPR.

A Politically Loaded Decision

Mickey Kaus of the right-of-center website The Daily Caller has been critical of pushes to relax immigration restrictions. He says journalists are bending to ideological pressure.

"It's heavily politically loaded," he says. "I think 'illegal immigrants' is really quite a clear phrase. It's so clear that President Obama used it when he was trying to make himself clear in a speech. He later apologized, but the fact that he used it implies that it is a very useful shorthand, as are all words, for what you're talking about."

Kaus says news organizations are tying themselves in knots to not offend Latino activists, Latino consumers and the advertisers who hope to reach them.

"Now we have this theory that no one word can possibly describe the inevitable state of being, whatever it is. Maybe it should be an unpronounceable symbol like Prince, 'cause we don't dare give it a name. Language is supposed to give things names and I don't think 'illegal immigrant' is that offensive a name."

Failing To Sidestep The Debate

The Fox News Channel has some particularly interesting contortions on the subject. In late April, while filling in for Sean Hannity, Monica Crowley went old-school and used the term "illegals." Fox News' preferred term is "illegal immigrant," though anchor Shepard Smith will sometimes use the phrase "undocumented immigrant." In March of last year, Bryan Llenas, a reporter for Fox News' sister website, Fox News Latino, told Fox viewers why the issue is charged for Hispanics.

"Nine in 10 support the DREAM Act; 85 percent support undocumented workers working in this country. And if you ask them whether they prefer the word 'illegal' versus 'undocumented,' a majority of them believe that the word 'illegal,' the term 'illegal immigrant,' is offensive."

That's why Fox News Latino doesn't use it. USC's Suro says journalists are attempting to sidestep the raging political debate — but they can't avoid getting swept up in it.

Copyright 2014 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Transcript

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

From NPR News, this is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I'm Robert Siegel.

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

And I'm Audie Cornish.

Journalists make choices all the time that influence the public's understanding of the news. What stories to cover, what people to interview, what words to use.

As NPR's David Folkenflik reports, in recent weeks, news organizations have been reconsidering the words they use to describe the 11 million people now in the country illegally.

DAVID FOLKENFLIK, BYLINE: News organizations as institutions often decide what terms to use in describing contentious subjects and then codify them in what are called style books. They're subject to change just as society's views change. Just consider terms used to describe race in this country.

When it comes to the question of people who are in this country illegally, recently you've heard a lot of coverage sounding like this.

(SOUNDBITE OF NEWS CLIPS)

UNIDENTIFIED MAN#1: The illegal immigrant from Mexico...

UNIDENTIFIED MAN#2: The undocumented...

UNIDENTIFIED MAN#3: Of illegal immigrants living...

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Undocumented immigrants took...

FOLKENFLIK: Roberto Suro is a former reporter for The New York Times and The Washington Post. He's now a scholar at the University of Southern California.

ROBERTO SURO: News organizations are kind of struggling. They're reflecting what's happening with society. What we see in the political arena is a society that's trying to sort out how to think about these people and where they belong in our society.

FOLKENFLIK: As Congress debates the merits of creating a quicker means for people here illegally to obtain citizenship, several major news outlets have shifted their policies. In April, the Associated Press decided the word illegal would only be used to describe actions, not people, as in talking about the issue of illegal immigration not illegal immigrants.

At the Los Angeles Times, Henry Furhmann noticed reporters were writing articles where they did not use the term illegal immigrant, even though it was preferred. Furhmann is an assistant managing editor at the L.A. Times who oversees standards, and he also oversees the paper's copy editing desk charged with enforcing those standards.

HENRY FURHMANN: I thought we had to either affirm our style and try to apply it more regularly or, in fact, listen to the voices of the newsroom - as we're listening to the voices outside the newsroom - and say maybe it was time for a fresh start.

FOLKENFLIK: Fuhrman himself is the son of an American father and a Japanese mother. He was born in Japan while his father served in the Navy. His mother became a naturalized American citizen. Fuhrmann asked one reporter: What do you use in your own articles?

FURHMANN: He found that, to his surprise, that he would use illegal immigrant if he was talking to, say, advocates of, say, stricter border control. And he would use undocumented immigrant if he was talking more to those being described, let's say.

FOLKENFLIK: The L.A. Times changed its policy, dropping both illegal and undocumented immigrants for a fuller description of those people. The New York Times has not abandoned illegal immigrant but encourage deeper characterization, as well - a position shared by NPR.

Mickey Kaus, of the right of center website The Daily Caller, who has been critical of pushes to relax immigration restrictions, says journalists are bending to ideological pressure.

MICKEY KAUS: Well it's heavily politically loaded, I think illegal immigrants is really quite a clear phrase. It's so clear that President Obama used it when he was trying to make himself clear in a speech. He later apologized. But the fact that he used it implies that it is a very useful shorthand, as are all words, for what you're talking about.

FOLKENFLIK: Kaus says news organizations are tying themselves in knots in order not to offend Latino activists, Latino consumers, and the advertisers who hope to reach them.

KAUS: Now we have this theory that no one word can possibly describe the inevitable state of being - whatever it is. Maybe it should be an unpronounceable symbol like Prince 'cause we don't dare to give it a name. Language is supposed to give things names and I don't think illegal immigrant is that offensive a name.

FOLKENFLIK: The Fox News Channel has some particularly notable wrinkles on the subject. Here's Monica Crowley substituting for Sean Hannity a few weeks ago.

(SOUNDBITE OF NEWSCAST)

MONICA CROWLEY: U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is now saying that he believes providing a path to citizenship for the 11 million illegals in America...

BRYAN LLENAS: Nine in 10 support the DREAM Act, 85 percent support undocumented workers working in this country. So, and if you ask them whether they prefer the word illegal versus undocumented, a majority of them believe that the word illegal, the term illegal immigrant, is offensive.

FOLKENFLIK: Which is why Fox News Latino does not use it.

USC's Roberto Suro says journalists are attempting to sidestep the raging political debate, but they cannot avoid getting swept up in it.