Monthly Archives: February 2018

I watch very few television programmes about ancient Greek and Roman history, literature and culture: when your day job is teaching and researching classics, these shows can be a bit of a ‘busman’s holiday’: I either know the material already, or (more often) I’ve become so specialized and limited in my expertise that huge swathes of ancient culture and history have become ‘news just in’. It’s not great to feel that you ought start taking notes at 9pm on a Friday night! Then there’s one’s insecurities to manage. If my week’s teaching has been a bit flat or difficult (Homeric dialect, anyone?), the last thing I want to see is Beard, Hughes, Hall, Cartledge or Scott doing a great job of making the ancient world irresistibly fascinating and accessible. Finally, there’s the ‘i’ word: we academics are now required by the government to make our research and expertise ‘impactful’ upon wider society and culture, and each department is regularly evaluated on how well it is going about this. That makes it even less relaxing to watch other people popularizing your subject to massive audiences with skill and verve.

But with film and television drama, it’s a different matter. Troy (Wolfgang Petersen’s quasi-Iliad for the big screen); Atlantis (BBC1’s now-defunct Greek mythology mash-up); Plebs (ITV 2’s Up Pompeii! for post-Millennials): I have sought them out and enjoyed them all. And I have not been very worried about real or alleged liberties taken in terms of historical ‘accuracy’ or ‘faithfulness to the original’. After all, most ancient myths exist in several different versions. In the case of Greek epic and drama, ancient authors themselves often changed existing elements of a story or made new stuff up in their re-tellings. Whoever Homer was – or ‘whatever’ if you think the Iliad and Odyssey were almost entirely shaped by centuries of oral song tradition rather than one master poet – it’s clear that both epics contain elements which were invented or adapted to suit these particular versions of two specific slices of a much longer story. So, I rather like the idea that film and television are enriching and adding to an existing store of many different ‘takes’ and emphases.

Of course, some changes from familiar ancient material can seem a step too far. When Petersen didn’t have any gods appearing in Troy – Julie Christie’s Thetis was an exception – a lot of film critics and classicists got very unhappy. (The film is hated by many people I know, and it does have flaws, but I’m rather fond of it as a creditable attempt to make sense of Homeric-heroic ‘values’ such as kleos (fame and reputation after death) and timē (honour, status) for a mainstream audience.)

But what exactly are we unhappy about when film and TV make such changes? Petersen’s Greeks and Trojans still worship the gods and worry about what they are up to, just as in Homer. And the Iliad’s many divine quarrels and political manoeuverings on Olympus wouldn’t have been best served by the sort of ‘dry ice and wafty white robes’ nonsense which we find in Clash of the Titans (1981). In any case, ‘departures’ from ‘the original’ don’t always make the story less engaging or worthwhile. The most iconic scene of the Jason and the Argonauts (1963) comes when Jason and his men find themselves fighting an army of stop-motion skeletons. In Apollonius’ epic The Argonautica these ‘sown men’ aren’t skeletons and Jason makes them fight amongst themselves until they destroy each other. If director Don Chaffey and effects animator Ray Harryhausen had stuck more closely to what’s in the ancient sources, that film would be much the poorer for it.

Perhaps we are worried that children and adults who are unfamiliar with Greek myths as preserved in Greco-Roman literature will end up with a false impression of what is (and what isn’t) in Homer, Pindar, Greek tragedy and the rest. Even worse, we think that they will say ‘I’ve seen Troy so I don’t need to know about the Iliad’. Well, that’s a risk with any decision to bring great stories and literature to the screen. But just as HBO’s Game of Thrones seems to have led more people to read the books on which it is based, and Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings created even bigger sales for Tolkein’s novels, some half-good telly or cinema ‘based on Homer’ has a good chance of sending its fans towards the actual epics themselves. The Iliad and Odyssey are well worth reading in a good translation, not least because they are highly vivid, dramatic and cinematic – and yet they ‘visualize’ thought, feeling, atmosphere and action in ways which neither big nor small screen finds it easy to capture with the same intensity.

BBC 1’s latest Saturday-night drama is called Troy: Fall of a City. It opening captions tell us that it is ‘based on Homer and the Greek myths’. The first episode went out last weekend and reactions have been mixed, to say the least. It’s neither easy nor fair to judge something after just one episode. But I thought it was very enjoyable – best watched with a glass of wine or two, perhaps. In my next post, I’ll offer some some first thoughts and observations on it from a classicist’s perspective. There will be **SPOILERS**.

If you are interested in classical story-telling and you are in or near St Andrews on Saturday 3rd March come to see TV and Radio’s BettanyHughes give a free public lecture on the subject. Details of the time and venue of her talk and the ‘Advocating Classical Education’ project are here