Comments for APACBizTalkhttps://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk
Wed, 09 Dec 2015 03:48:30 +0000hourly1Comment on BAM Tracking not working correctly with custom pipeline component when message type is unknown by Imran Shafqathttps://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/09/24/bam-tracking-not-working-correctly-with-custom-pipeline-component-when-message-type-is-unknown/#comment-192
Wed, 09 Dec 2015 03:48:30 +0000https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/09/24/bam-tracking-not-working-correctly-with-custom-pipeline-component-when-message-type-is-unknown/#comment-192Any update on this as we are getting the same error?
]]>Comment on SSO service Memory Leak after applying hotfix of KB3000847 by Vikas Bhardwajhttps://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/05/08/sso-service-memory-leak-after-applying-hotfix-of-kb3000847/#comment-202
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:32:58 +0000https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/05/08/sso-service-memory-leak-after-applying-hotfix-of-kb3000847/#comment-202KB3062831 is the hotfix number to fix SSO high memory usage
]]>Comment on BAM data of Port Messaging Properties doesn’t get correctly populated when using Passthrough Pipeline on BizTalk 2013 R2 by Wen-Jun Zhanghttps://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/05/14/bam-data-of-port-messaging-properties-doesnt-get-correctly-populated-when-using-passthrough-pipeline-on-biztalk-2013-r2/#comment-181
Tue, 26 May 2015 19:57:22 +0000https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/05/14/bam-data-of-port-messaging-properties-doesnt-get-correctly-populated-when-using-passthrough-pipeline-on-biztalk-2013-r2/#comment-181Hi Dave,

We've had a hotfix to correct the behavior. Please contact MS support to obtain it.

Best regards,

WenJun

]]>Comment on The element orders in schemas generated by WCF-SQL adapter are different for SQL 2012 and SQL 2014 by Wen-Jun Zhanghttps://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/04/06/the-element-orders-in-schemas-generated-by-wcf-sql-adapter-are-different-for-sql-2012-and-sql-2014/#comment-171
Tue, 26 May 2015 19:53:53 +0000https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/04/06/the-element-orders-in-schemas-generated-by-wcf-sql-adapter-are-different-for-sql-2012-and-sql-2014/#comment-171We now have a hotfix to correct the behavior. Please contact Microsoft Support to obtain the fix if you are facing the same issue.
]]>Comment on BAM data of Port Messaging Properties doesn’t get correctly populated when using Passthrough Pipeline on BizTalk 2013 R2 by Davehttps://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/05/14/bam-data-of-port-messaging-properties-doesnt-get-correctly-populated-when-using-passthrough-pipeline-on-biztalk-2013-r2/#comment-161
Tue, 26 May 2015 13:57:29 +0000https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/05/14/bam-data-of-port-messaging-properties-doesnt-get-correctly-populated-when-using-passthrough-pipeline-on-biztalk-2013-r2/#comment-161Hi again WenJun Zhang,

I've also been able to reproduce this when using the XmlReceive pipeline with the "AllowUnrecognisedMessage" property set to "True". This makes sense with your observation from the reflected code that it's related to whenever the message type hasn't been identified.

Cheers,

Dave

]]>Comment on BAM data of Port Messaging Properties doesn’t get correctly populated when using Passthrough Pipeline on BizTalk 2013 R2 by Davehttps://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/05/14/bam-data-of-port-messaging-properties-doesnt-get-correctly-populated-when-using-passthrough-pipeline-on-biztalk-2013-r2/#comment-151
Sun, 24 May 2015 22:10:01 +0000https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/05/14/bam-data-of-port-messaging-properties-doesnt-get-correctly-populated-when-using-passthrough-pipeline-on-biztalk-2013-r2/#comment-151Hi WenJun Zhang, any update on a resolution for this? I realise this is probably an obscure scenario, but in our case we really NEED this to work in the pass-thru scenario. Thanks! Dave
]]>Comment on Messages stay in “Active” status for quite a long time without suspending or error when using a certificate to call external WCF service on BizTalk server by Jamiehttps://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2013/06/10/messages-stay-in-active-status-for-quite-a-long-time-without-suspending-or-error-when-using-a-certificate-to-call-external-wcf-service-on-biztalk-server/#comment-123
Sun, 24 May 2015 14:48:44 +0000https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2013/06/10/messages-stay-in-active-status-for-quite-a-long-time-without-suspending-or-error-when-using-a-certificate-to-call-external-wcf-service-on-biztalk-server/#comment-123Thanks for this information, we encountered the same problem with our X509 certificate.

By default the 'Enable strong private key protection' check box was enabled when initially importing to the service account personal store, so by reimporting the certificate with this option disabled solved the problem.

Also, to get the thread stack dump as above you need to run command !eestack from WinDbg

]]>Comment on The element orders in schemas generated by WCF-SQL adapter are different for SQL 2012 and SQL 2014 by Gigi Paulhttps://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/04/06/the-element-orders-in-schemas-generated-by-wcf-sql-adapter-are-different-for-sql-2012-and-sql-2014/#comment-141
Wed, 13 May 2015 08:57:46 +0000https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/04/06/the-element-orders-in-schemas-generated-by-wcf-sql-adapter-are-different-for-sql-2012-and-sql-2014/#comment-141We are facing the same problem. The Schema is being generated with out the column order clause, which is causing a column sequence mismatch.

Erik, this is generated by the biztalk adapter, hence there is no way to specify the order clause.

Any solutions by anybody?

Thanks

]]>Comment on "Failed to decode the S/MIME message. The S/MIME message may not be valid." when using POP adapter to process incoming emails in BizTalk server 2009 by Tonihttps://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2013/10/31/failed-to-decode-the-smime-message-the-smime-message-may-not-be-valid-when-using-pop-adapter-to-process-incoming-emails-in-biztalk-server-2009/#comment-113
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:56:02 +0000https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2013/10/31/failed-to-decode-the-smime-message-the-smime-message-may-not-be-valid-when-using-pop-adapter-to-process-incoming-emails-in-biztalk-server-2009/#comment-113This solution worked for us on 2006R2, thank you so much!!!
]]>Comment on The element orders in schemas generated by WCF-SQL adapter are different for SQL 2012 and SQL 2014 by ErikEJhttps://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/04/06/the-element-orders-in-schemas-generated-by-wcf-sql-adapter-are-different-for-sql-2012-and-sql-2014/#comment-103
Mon, 06 Apr 2015 01:31:04 +0000https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/apacbiztalk/2015/04/06/the-element-orders-in-schemas-generated-by-wcf-sql-adapter-are-different-for-sql-2012-and-sql-2014/#comment-103Correct solution is to never expect ordering, and add an ORDER BY clause
]]>