Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is.
I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Thursday, November 29, 2012

The NCSE is Totally Clueless

-
The NCSE has written a blurb about Montana because apparently there is a bill that may have ID taught in their public schools. However the NCSE proves it is run by clueless dolts with the following entry:

As such, the bill would presumably conflict with the decision in the 2005 case Kitzmiller v. Dover, in which requiring the public schools to teach "intelligent design" was held to be unconstitutional.

Exuse me, morons, but that decision pertains to that school district only and has no weight outside of that smal, insignificant school district. It means nothing to Montana. Heck it means nothing to the rest of Pennsylvania.
So why are evolutionists so freaking stupid that they do not understand the basic facts about how the Law works? And why don't they realize tat by their own "logic" the teaching of unguided evolution is unconstitutional?

To be honest, I don't think the Montana bill is a good idea because it politicizes ID:

http://www.discovery.org/a/3164

And yes, I agree the Dover case was extremely flawed. Especially the fact that the Foundation for Thought and Ethics was denied due process and couldn't explain what the early drafts from Of Pandas and People actually said.

Nonetheless, I'm glad to see another active ID blog and I hope you keep it up!

I don't live in Montana. But I am sure people in Montana know that there is more evidence for pyramid power, baraminology, dragon flies playing, and especially ice not being water, than there is for evolutionism.

I bet when they go ICE fishing they can see the difference between ICE and water.

No one drills holes in water to get to the fish swimming in the water- well maybe you and your fellow tards do...

It is fairly easy, using only high school level physics, to debunk the Flood narrative.

Mt. Everest is 8848 meters high. The mass of water needed to cover the entire Earth to that depth is 4.5 x 1021 kg.

If all that water came down from outer space, it would have to start out in the form of ice. The change in potential energy of all that ice raining down on the Earth works out to be 2.8 x 1029 joules.

If it came down evenly over the entire surface of the Earth during a period of 40 days, that is equivalent to 383 megatons of TNT going off every second for each and every square meter of the Earth’s surface; and that includes the surface of the Ark as well.

On the other hand, if the water came up from inside the Earth’s lithosphere, it would have to have come from depths considerably greater than 8848 meters. The depths from which it came would be at temperatures of at least 250 degrees Celsius, and up to over 1000 degrees Celsius if the water was in contact with the Earth’s mantle. This would result in superheated steam boiling up out of the earth to release its heat and condense into a liquid that covered the entire Earth. Where did all that heat go?

How did the Ark survive either of those scenarios?

This is how we know that the vast majority of the followers of ID/creationism don’t have even a high school level of understanding of science. They cannot grasp the implications of such a simple calculation. Not one of them can even begin the calculation let alone understand it. Just watch them try to word-game it away without ever doing the calculation."

Wait. I thought evolutionism was history! As such it should be fair game for analysis. How many mutations did it take to get an upright biped from a knuckle-walker/ quadraped, Erik? Please show your work.