Tuesday, June 06, 2006

The really truly interesting thing is that I myself know of around 30 people who expressed interest in reviewing the book via the online PDF or paper copy. Have we seen any of those? Nope.

So - you slackers. Read the damn book and tell us why we suck. Or praise us. Nitpick, heck anything would be welcome at this point.

If you are plowing through, well that’s okay. Obviously it’s not a paying gig, we’d just like to know that we’re still in your hearts and minds. I know DK is busier than a one-armed paper-hanger and Gerrold only said he’d think about a review and if we’ve been waiting for the last 10 years for the next Chtorr book we might be waiting until 2050 for a review from that quarter ….

Gad. Busting on David Gerrold for being tardy to publish the last Chtorr book is like potting fish in a barrel. And unfair, in the cold light of day. He's a busy guy, with a lot of irons in the fire.

The really truly interesting thing is that I myself know of around 30 people who expressed interest in reviewing the book via the online PDF or paper copy. Have we seen any of those? Nope.

So - you slackers. Read the damn book and tell us why we suck. Or praise us. Nitpick, heck anything would be welcome at this point.

If you are plowing through, well that’s okay. Obviously it’s not a paying gig, we’d just like to know that we’re still in your hearts and minds. I know DK is busier than a one-armed paper-hanger and Gerrold only said he’d think about a review and if we’ve been waiting for the last 10 years for the next Chtorr book we might be waiting until 2050 for a review from that quarter ….

Gad. Busting on David Gerrold for being tardy to publish the last Chtorr book is like potting fish in a barrel. And unfair, in the cold light of day. He's a busy guy, with a lot of irons in the fire.