Brussels, 19 January 2011 -- EU member state parliaments look set to lose important powers to control economic and social policy as a result of the EU’s response to the economic crisis according to a new article from Corporate Europe Observatory which analyses the proposals, likely to come into force in 2011, and warns that they will lead to a reduction in democratic accountability and public influence. [url=http://www.corporateeurope.org/lobbycracy/content/2011/01/corporate-euto... EUtopia[/url] also questions the role of big business lobby groups in setting the economic agenda [1].
Billed as a “silent revolution” by European Commission President José Manuel Barroso [2], the proposals include the introduction of the European Semester [3] to monitor national budgets; tough new rules to enforce the Growth and Stability Pact, requiring member states to reduce debts; and a new early warning system which will allow the European Commission to intervene where member states show signs of “macroeconomic imbalance” [4].
Member states may face enormous economic sanctions if they fail to impose the economic ‘cures’ recommended by the EU Commission and Council – including potential fines for countries within the eurozone and the withdrawal of EU funding for non-euro members.
The proposals have been welcomed by big business lobby groups including BusinessEurope and the European Roundtable of Industrialists, which has been promoting this form of economic governance to improve competitiveness for the last decade.
Report author Kenneth Haar said: “The EU Commission and Council, backed by big business, have put forward radical proposals to fundamentally change the way in which EU member states govern their national economies – and European citizens are being given no opportunity to discuss what these changes mean. The proposals are likely to mean EU-imposed austerity measures, without any opportunity for public influence. Member states will be required to cut social spending, slash wages and workers’ rights, while privatising basic services in the name of greater efficiency. These are important issues in a democracy and should be opposed.”
The European Parliament will consider the new proposals in April 2011, with a final vote currently scheduled for June 2011.
Contact: Kenneth Haar, [url=mailto:kenneth@corporateeurope.org]kenneth@corporateeurope.org[/url]
Notes:
[1] Corporate EUtopia – how new economic governance measures challenge democracy, Corporate Europe Observatory, January 2011, see: http://www.corporateeurope.org/lobbycracy/content/2011/01/corporate-eutopia
[2] José Manuel Barroso at the European University Institute, Florence, 18 June 2010. Video available at [url=http://www.eui.eu/News/2010/06-07-Barroso.aspx]http://www.eui.eu/News/20...
[3] The European Semester began on Wednesday 12 January 2011. See: European Commission, COM (2010) 367/2, page 11-14, [url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/articles/euro/documents/com_2010_367...
[4] European Commission; "Reinforcing economic policy coordination", COM (2010) 250 final, 12 May 2010, [url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/articles/euro/documents/2010-05-12-c...

The ‘agreement’ that the eurozone countries and the Troika forced on the Greek government during the “night of shame” strangled space for a progressive project. It is not only dangerous for the Greeks, but for citizens all across the European Union.

A crusade for big business-friendly deregulation, waged during José Manuel Barroso's Presidency of the European Commission, shows no signs of stopping. This neoliberal push to weaken or block new legislation appears likely to expand with Jean-Claude Juncker's new Commission team.

The ESM, the euro area’s permanent bailout fund set up in 2012, is an international organization that operates behind closed doors, far from public scrutiny. The institution at the heart of EU loans to debt-ridden member states is doing its best to stave off any national influence over the conditions attached to its loans. In addition it is working closely with private consultancies, which appear to have conflicts of interest. However, the ESM is immune to democracy; we have no right to know what it is up to.

The ‘agreement’ that the eurozone countries and the Troika forced on the Greek government during the “night of shame” strangled space for a progressive project. It is not only dangerous for the Greeks, but for citizens all across the European Union.

The prospective EU-US trade deal could be the world's biggest such treaty. The revolving door between public and private sectors is helping to grease the wheels of the TTIP corporate lobby. This phenomenon creates great potential for conflicts of interest, and demonstrates the synergies between business interests and the Commission, UK government, and others when it comes to trade negotiations.

Subscribe to our newsletter

First Name

Last Name

Email *

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) is a research and campaign group working to expose and challenge the privileged access and influence enjoyed by corporations and their lobby groups in EU policy making.

CEO relies on grants and donations to carry out our research and campaign work. By making a donation or becoming a friend of CEO you help to support our efforts to expose corporate lobbying, increase transparency and urge greater democratic accountabililty in the EU.Or