Sign up to receive an email when a new article is posted.

Email Address

Luminous Landscape will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Luminous-Landscape.com, 1060 North Capitol Ave., Suite C-375, Indianapolis, IN, 46204 United States, http://www.luminous-landscape.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.

Sony A7RII ISO Invariance

Sony A7RII ISO Invariance

Should You Underexpose, or Use High ISO?

A Story

Back in the early days of digital photography – around 2001 / 2005 – a standard part of my seminars and lectures was to make a provocative statement… “Film is digital. Sensors are analogue.” This would freak people out because many believed at the time that there was something inherently “purer” about analogue imaging.

I would point out that film was inherently digital in nature because a silver halide particle when exposed to light would either turn black or not turn black. On-off. Yes-no. This is digital behaviour. It’s when you have millions of such particles displaying semi-stochastic behaviour at a microscopic level that we produce the appearance of a continuous tone image.

A camera sensor, on the other hand, is an analogue device. Each sensel (pixel) interprets the amount of light hitting it as a voltage. Voltage is analogue in nature – continuous not discrete. The sensor’s circuitry then converts the analogue signal from each sensel into a digital signal so that millions of them can be conveniently processed into an image.

Actually, sensors are digital as well because of the quantum nature of light – but that’s another story.

Nevertheless – at its most basic level, film is digital and sensors are analogue.

So much for a background story. What does this have to do with ISO Invariance, and what the hell is ISO Invariance in the first place?

ISO Invariance

As part of DPReview’s initial review of the Sony A7RII back in March 2015, and again in an article on that site by Rishi Sanyal in August, the issue of ISO Invariance was discussed. Please read these original sources. But, in brief, what they refer to is the observation that certain current-generation sensors, such as those in the Nikon 800 series cameras and the latest Sony A7 series, such as the A7RII, have a very low inherent noise floor. Consequently, these cameras have very high dynamic range and also low noise at higher ISO. Indeed, cameras based on the latest generation Sony sensors have tested (DxO among others) as having the lowest noise and widest dynamic range in the current marketplace.

The articles referenced point out that the sensor in the A7RII, for example, appears to be ISO-less. To obtain higher ISOs the camera gives a boost to the signal in the analogue domain. Interesting, to be sure, but – so what?

The “so what” is that this implies (and also actually is demonstrable with a simple test that anyone can do), that by exposing an image at a maximum of ISO 640 one can get comparable results by adjusting the image in Camera Raw or Lightroom after the fact as with letting the camera do it internally when shooting. This is because internally the camera is boosting the signal in the analogue domain, before the D_to_A converter, while doing so on one’s computer is working strictly in the digital domain.

Also, boosting the signal in the camera does so to all tonal values, while in powerful raw processing software it may be possible to protect highlights and prevent them from blowing out while still boosting shadow values.

In the sample image above we see a normal ISO 640 exposure in Fig#1 and a 100% crop of that image in Fig#2. In Fig#3 the image is underexposed by 5 stops and then in Fig#4 the shadows have been opened by five stops with the Exposure slider in Lightroom. Finally, in Fig#5, for the sake of comparison we see an exposure of the scene at ISO 12800.

This behaviour is more of a curiosity than anything else. I’m not drawing attention to it here for any reason other than that I found it to be interesting. There are many photographers who chat on the forums who revel in the technology and love discussing arcane aspects of sensor performance. This is above my pay grade (not to mention my level of interest), but this phenomenon is easily testable by anyone with a current Nikon or Sony camera in about 15 minutes, so is fun to experiment with.

Different conditions will, of course, produce differing results. Also, if you decide to try heavy underexposure combined with compensation in post-processing be sure to set your Sony camera to Gear Menu / Live View Display / Setting Effect OFF, so that you can see what you’re doing. Otherwise, your viewfinder will be extremely dark.

Michael Reichmann
November, 2015

Stay up to date!

Michael Reichmann

Michael Reichmann is the founder of the Luminous Landscape. Michael passed away in May 2016. Since its inception in 1999 LuLa has become the world's largest site devoted to the art, craft, and technology of pho... [ Author’s Page and Articles ]

Stay Connected

Michael Reichmann

Michael Reichmann is the founder of the Luminous Landscape. Michael passed away in May 2016. Since its inception in 1999 LuLa has become the world's largest site devoted to the art, craft, and technology of pho... [ Author’s Page and Articles ]