In a rare decision on compensation issues, the Connecticut Supreme Court has decided that an employee is not required to repay advances of unearned commissions unless there is an express or implied agreement that requires such repayment. The decision in Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc., makes clear that Connecticut employers that pay commissions need to carefully review their commission plans and all documents that describe commission to ensure they are sufficiently clear and specific to require an employee to repay advances of commissions that he or she has failed to earn.

The National Employment & Labor Law Firm™ 1.888.littler www.littler.com info@littler.com in this issue: May 2008 In a rare decision on compensation issues, the Connecticut Supreme Court has decided that an employee is not required to repay advances of unearned commissions unless there is an express or implied agreement that requires such repayment. The decision in Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc., makes clear that Connecticut employers that pay commissions need to carefully review their commission plans and all documents that describe commission to ensure they are sufficiently clear and specific to require an employee to repay advances of commissions that he or she has failed to earn. A S A P ™A Littler Mendelson Time Sensitive Newsletter Littler Mendelson is the largest law firm in the United States devoted exclusively to representing management in employment and labor law matters. Connecticut Employees Can Keep Unearned Commissions Unless Employment Agreement Expressly Requires Repayment of Advances By George E. O’Brien, Jr. and Stephen P. Rosenberg In a rare decision on compensation issues, the Connecticut Supreme Court has decided that an employee was not required to repay advances of unearned commissions because his employment agreement did not expressly require such repayment. In Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc., 285 Conn. 716 (2008), the court held that merely using the word “advance” or “draw” in an employment agreement is not sufficient to require an employee to repay advances on commissions that the employee failed to earn. The plaintiff, W. Frederick Ravetto, was a vice-president of sales who earned an annual salary of $110,000 plus commissions on sales to certain industries. Ravetto’s employment agreement with Triton Thalassic Technologies provided him, in addition to his salary, with a draw in each pay period as an advance against his future commissions. In September 2001, Triton notified employees that because of financial difficulties it was unable to make payroll. Some employees resigned but most, including Ravetto, continued working in the hope that the company would become able to pay them. In March 2002, the company furloughed all employees until further notice. Ravetto sued Triton under Connecticut’s state wage statute for unpaid salary plus interest. Triton contended it was entitled to deduct from the amount of salary it owed Ravetto the approximately $40,000 of commission advances that the company had paid to Ravetto in excess of the commissions he actually earned. The trial court concluded that the employment agreement did not expressly require Ravetto to repay such advances, so he could keep the $40,000 and also recover unpaid salary. Triton appealed. Triton argued that the term “advance” in the employment agreement required Ravetto to repay amounts he had been advanced in excess of the commissions he actually earned. The Connecticut Supreme Court looked to decisions from other states, including California, Georgia, Massachusetts, New York and Wisconsin that had addressed similar issues of contract interpretation. Following the reasoning of courts in those states, the Connecticut court concluded that “the use of terms such as ‘advance’ or ‘draw,’ standing alone, is not sufficiently indicative of the parties’ intent to obligate the employee to repay the advances.”1 “[B]ecause the employer generally enjoys superior bargaining power in the employment relationship, it is incumbent upon the employer to make any obligation for reimbursement explicit in the employment agreement.”2 The court drew an analogy between employment relationships that are commission based, and joint ventures: [W]hen an employee works for an employer on a commission basis, the employee and employer are engaged in a joint venture.... If an employee were to be required to repay all excess advances when the business East Coast Edition A Littler Mendelson East Coast-specific Newsletter Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=fbb6efd1-c1cc-44d1-9087-a78b39af43dcThe National Employment & Labor Law Firm™ 1.888.littler www.littler.com info@littler.com ASAP™ is published by Littler Mendelson in order to review the latest developments in employment law. ASAP™ is designed to provide accurate and informative information and should not be considered legal advice. A S A P ™ 2 did not produce sufficient commissions to cover the advances, the entire risk of the joint undertaking would be placed on the employee, and such an outcome would be contrary to the nature of the relationship as a joint venture.3 The court thus held that “absent a contractual provision expressly holding [an employee] personally liable for advances, [an employer] must show that [the employee], by his [or her] conduct, exhibited an intent to be held personally liable for the repayment of the advances.”4 Justice Peter Zarella dissented. He would have required the trial court to consider extrinsic evidence of the parties’ negotiations and employment relationship to determine the meaning of the word “advance” in the employment agreement. Justice Zarella disagreed with the majority’s decision to adopt a rule that requires evidence of an express or implied agreement by the employee to repay advances on unearned commissions. Instead, he would rely on traditional contract principles that “require the employer to prove by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the parties contemplated repayment.”5 Justice Zarella also disagreed that an employer necessarily possesses superior bargaining power in all its employment relationships, noting that Ravetto was a highly compensated professional whereas Triton was a start-up company with limited resources. The majority opinion in Ravetto makes clear that Connecticut employers that pay commissions need to carefully review their commission plans and all documents that relate to commissions with these points in mind: Any commission • arrangement should be thoroughly and accurately described in writing. In a dispute about payment, Connecticut is likely to construe any ambiguity about the commission system against the employer. • Whether the rules governing commissions are described in a contract or separate commission plan document, each sales employee must sign the document indicating his or her agreement to its terms. The employer needs to obtain and preserve such signed acknowledgments systematically. • Words like “advance” or “draw” will not by themselves create an obligation for the employee to repay unearned commissions. • Where the employee will be obligated to repay unearned commissions, or have them credited against future earnings, this must be explained in crystal clear language in the governing document. That language must be crafted to ensure that the employee’s signature clearly constitutes his or her agreement to this obligation. • Both the timing of periodic commission reconciliations and the procedure for settling commissions upon the end of employment should be specifically covered in the document that the employee signs. • Because of the complexities of Connecticut Department of Labor regulations that govern the timing of periodic commission reconciliations and the form of commission agreements, employers would be well advised to consult with legal counsel when implementing or amending a commission arrangement. George E. O’Brien, Jr. is the Office Managing Shareholder and Stephen P. Rosenberg is an Associate in Littler Mendelson’s New Haven office. If you would like further information, please contact your Littler attorney at 1.888.Littler, info@littler.com, Mr. O’Brien at gobrien@littler.com, or Mr. Rosenberg at sprosenberg@littler.com. 1 Ravetto, 285 Conn. at 738. 2 Id. at 740. 3 Id. at 741 (internal citations omitted). 4 Id. at 741-42. 5 Id. at 754. Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=fbb6efd1-c1cc-44d1-9087-a78b39af43dc

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.