Mobile App

A native mobile app is an application for your smartphone developed specifically for a particular mobile operating system. Like Swift or Objective-C for iOS and Java for Android. Because the app has been developed within a developed ecosystem which has been followed by the user experience and technical guidelines of the OS (for example swipes, app defined gestures, centrally aligned header on iOS, left aligned header on Android, etc.), not only does it have the advantage of more efficient performance but it also “feels right”. Feeling right means that the interactions that happens within the app has a look and feel that is consistent with many of the other native mobile apps that are present on the device. The end user is therefore more likely to adapt to navigating and using the app faster.

Finally, native applications have major benefit of being able to access with ease and use capabilities built in the device. For example, address book, GPS, camera, etc. When a user takes pictures, makes a call, sends text messages using the built-in apps in the device, sets reminders, or uses the music app that came installed in the app, they are using the native mobile apps. Basically, native apps are just that, they are native to the operating system and thus built as per those guidelines.

Hybrid applications are, in essence, websites that have been packaged into a native wrapper. They appear and feel like a native app, but are essentially beyond the basic frame of the app (normally limited to the navigational elements/controls) and they are powered by a company’s website. A hybrid app is a basically a web app that has been built using JavaScript and HTML5, that has been wrapped up in a native container which can load most of the information on the page as the user navigates through the app (native apps on the other hand download almost all of the content when the app is installed for the first time). The prime examples of hybrid apps are Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, mobile banking app, etc.

Opting for the Right One:

Normally, when a company decides to go ahead and build a mobile app, they have identified a business opportunity that has not yet been fully utilized or playing catch up with their competitors. Whatever may be the reason, the company executives would want the application to be built out and released for use ASAP. However, as many people already know, ASAP may often end up having quite a few compromises that may be need to be made and also making immediate decisions. Both native and hybrid approaches can get job done but there are some considerations that should be understood before deciding.

If company can wait for six months or more before launch of app, going for native app is best option. Native apps perform the best, have the highest security, and also the smoothest user experience.

If the time at hand before going for launch is shorter than six months, then hybrid could be preferred alternative. As the app can be built in a single source code, released across platforms, and the development effort and time is considerably less when compared to that of the native applications.

Whatever the option you might prefer, it should be always noted that the users will expect a great experience at all times. They are not really concerned as to the approach your team has decided to go for. When they launch the app, they would expect it to be intuitive, responsive, smooth, and fast.

Launching the app

Launching across platforms may guarantee a mobile presence but it most definitely does not guarantee the success for the app. As mobile app usage grows and overtakes the convention browsing patterns on desktop and laptops, which has been happening since the past year especially, companies who have a mobile presence need to consistently focus on the two main promoters or deterrents of their mobile applications: user experience and speed.

Ionic vs Xamarian:

Overall, the user experience and the performance of the mobile app may significantly vary based on the development framework chosen. With the native app coming up trumps convincingly in both departments.

When choosing between development frameworks, two good options are Ionic vs. Xamarian. Between these two, the first major differentiator is the price. Ionic has a tempting price tag of being free. But some companies might not mind paying $1000 per developer per year for Xamarian if certain conditions apply to them. For companies who have only .NET developers and the architecture is exclusive to .NET, and can afford the price tag, Xamarian would seem a decent option.

A well made HTML based app will never be able to get the look and feel of a native app. Prefer Xamarian for the fastest, smoothest, and most authentic experience for the users.

If the speed of launching the app is of the essence, Ionic emerges the clear favorite. Ionic has a much better development experience. If developing in the app in double quick time is most important for you, Ionic is your best friend.

In terms of overall maintainability of the app, Xamarian beats Ionic comfortably.