I became interested into IBM's (IBM) shares ever since Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio) bought stock in the company for the first time back in 2011 – and he kept on buying shares to this day. Nevertheless, I never found a price point where I would be interested to buy the company's shares until now. After disappointing fourth quarter results came up, IBM's shares took a plunge (the stock is down by 4% since quarterly results were unveiled) leaving the company at an attractive valuation point for a company which is growing its EPS and buying back shares.

All the above being said, the company remains a software and IT solutions powerhouse that can be trusted by CIO's across the corporate world making it a great Free Cash Flow machine that cares for its shareholders – the company has a strong share buyback plan and keeps on increasing its cash dividend yield - now at around 2%. Besides, IBM's management has reiterated its EPS guidance of $20 in 2015 earnings which makes it an increasingly attractive asset from a price to earnings perspective.

Selling under performing businesses

On the other hand, IBM seems to be focusing in its most promising businesses and is willing to sell those segments that are not compelling from a ROIC standpoint. A great example of this is IBM's recent agreement to sell the company's x86 server business to Lenovo (LNVGY) for approximately $2.3 billion ($2.0 billion in cash and $300 million in Lenovo stock) or 0.5 times 2013 sales. On top of the cash and stock price, around 7,500 IBM employees shall be hired by Lenovo.

Even when the price tag looks low relatively to what IBM initially wanted for its x86 business (around $5 billion), the IT giant is removing from its P&L a business that added no significant synergies and generated a pre tax loss of $37.4 million a year.

On Valuation

From a valuation standpoint the stock looks progressively cheap even when its top line growth has been more and more disappointing. IBM sells for 2014 10 times earnings and 7.8 times EV/EBITDA at a time when the company is growing EPS and its operating cash flow per share. Other IT giants such as Oracle (ORCL) sell for 2014 13 times earnings and 8.8 times EV/EBITDA. Vmware (VMW), a leader in cloud computing and a competitor to IBM in that segment, sells for 2014 27 times earnings and 19 times EV/EBITDA.

Bottom line

The oracle of Omaha might be right once more. IBM's management seems committed to keep on transforming the tech giant from a hardware provider to an IT services company committed to giving back cash to its shareholders. Maybe the shares could go down even further but, for sure, IBM looks like a company any value driven investor should keep on his/her watch list.

"3) I think International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:IBM) is a slowly declining business engaging in every trick in the book to mask this fact (which is why I’m short it). Jeff Matthews nails it in this blog post:

IBM, to IBMers, always stood for “I’ve Been Moved,” a reference to the way Big Blue moved employees around the country and around the globe to get experience as they worked their way up the ranks.

To Wall Street, however, IBM could stand for “I’ve Been Manipulated,” because no public company we can think of does a better job of schmoozing Wall Street’s Finest and convincing them that there’s a there there, when in fact the there is not quite as there as it might seem."

That's very interesting Tilson is short IBM. But the arguments him and Stan Druckenmiller give are in my opinion terrible. Druckenmiller described the company as a bet against innovation while Amazon is for it. The $1 billion in Watson, $2 billion in Softlayer (cloud business), $1.2 billion in data centers for the cloud, $1 billion on flash memory development and billions more in other acquisitions and other R&D really convey they're taking the competition serious and adjusting for the future.

The Systems & Technology revenue has been declining, but that's all part of IBM's plan as they parcel off that declining business piece by piece. The other businesses except the financing business (which makes sense, companies awash in cash don't need financing) are also growing or at the very worse stagnanting. Tilson is surely a smart guy, but I'll take Buffett's conviction over his and Druckenmiller's any day

Disclaimers: GuruFocus.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on GuruFocus.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The gurus may buy and sell securities before and after any particular article and report and information herein is published, with respect to the securities discussed in any article and report posted herein. In no event shall GuruFocus.com be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on GuruFocus.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, GuruFocus.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. The gurus listed in this website are not affiliated with GuruFocus.com, LLC.
Stock quotes provided by InterActive Data. Fundamental company data provided by Morningstar, updated daily.