Posts Tagged ‘I am angry!’

A couple of months ago, I posted that David “Ally Mcbeal” Kelley was developing a Wonder Woman series for television, and that I was very open that I did not think Kelley was the right person for the job. Initially, all the networks passed on the script claiming that it would be too expensive to produce. But NBC changed executives, and the new regime decided to order the pilot.

Well blogger/TV critic Jace Lacob, has had a look at the script, and it is worse than I had imagined. You can see his summary here, but it does not bode well at all. Some things that stick out for me as not just inconsistent to the character, but really bad writing in general are: that Diana is given three identities. One is Wonder Woman, crime fighter. Another is as Diana Themyscira, the CEO of an international corporation, who collects transforming aircraft (the hell?). And finally as Diana Prince, a mousy assistant. I don’t get this conceit at all. It is traditional for super-hero’s to have a super-hero identity, and a separate civilian identity (in fact in the comics she does sort of have three, wonder woman, Diana Prince, and the Princess of the Amazons. But the princess/wonder woman identities are publicly acknowledged as the same). But why have two civilian identities? with two separate residences? Especially when at least one of the identities, the CEO, sounds to be very recognizable as a public figure. What is the point of the third identity? This just makes the character sound a bit psycho.

Anaother red flag, that this is not a Wonder Woman I want to watch is this that as the CEO, she has in her employ a gaggle of “nerds” whose function seems to be to make sexual inneundo about her. For example when she instructs them to bone up on something, one replies the he would, “Bone you up right now, boss.” That she tolerates this is makes her not just unbelievable as Wonder Woman, but as a successful business woman, as well.

Lacob says it best here, about what sounds likely to be one of the worst scenes to ever be filmed;

In the script’s most painful sequence, Diana is subpoenaed by the Senate Judiciary Committee and forced to give testimony about the events in Hollywood. She ends up filibustering about everything under the sun for several pages: the politics of the LAPD (name checking ex-police chiefs Daryl Gates and William Bratton), the economy, stimulus funds, pharmaceutical companies, Roger Clemens, the FDA and the FCC, and how networks will air commercials about erectile dysfunction but not for condoms. It’s clearly meant to be a showcase scene for the actress playing Diana, a calculated bid at awards and social relevance. Congratulations, David E. Kelley, the transformation of Wonder Woman from superhero to personal mouthpiece is now complete. Adding further insult to injury: real-life California Senator Dianne Feinstein is described as giving Diana a thumbs-up.

Pages of rambling about anything that crosses Kelley’s mind, is the big triumphant moment? In a show about a super-hero? What?

And apparently the episode ends with her weeping over her romantic woes! DO NOT WANT!

Yeah it sounds horrible, and I do not get what NBC was thinking. Are Harry’s Law, and the Cape doing that well?

Anyway here are the original concept sketches for Wonder Woman, way back in the forties.

Yes, she is wearing a bustier, but she was a warrior damnit!

And just because I think it’s awesome, here is Project Runway’s Chris March as Wonder Woman.