Sunday, 13 October 2013

Augustine on the stupidity of Apollo and Neptune.

The sacking of Rome on August 24 in the year 410 by the Visigoths
was not only a material blow against the Roman Empire, but also – and may be
even more – a psychological blow.The
Eternal City was left burning with bodies heaped up, people taken away as
prisoners and women raped. True, the Visigoths had reserved some basilicas as
asylums – they were Christians, be it Arians – but this did not diminish the
pain felt. Christianity was the official religion, but there were many amongst
the aristocracy who were no Christians and explained this disaster as a result
of leaving ancient Roman religion: the Gods had taken revenge.

Augustine responded to those claims by writing De Civitate Dei. It took him at least 15 years to compose it, but
once finished he had written one of the most influential books of Western
culture. The reason why it took him so long is because as a bishop he was a
busy man: preaching every week, an intensive correspondence, writing
theological tractates and maybe also to clarify his mind over matters.It is nowadays hardly known outside the
academic world, but during the Middle Ages it was widely read. Augustine warns
his readers that this life is only temporary and that Christians should have
their mind set on the heavenly city.This may sound as some dry theological treatise, but Augustine was a
passionate writer, by nature a psychologist and by study one of the most learned
men of that time. His De Civitate Dei
is a consolation, a refutation of Roman religion and a study of history of over
a thousand pages – and it is a document of how classical tradition merged with
Christian thinking.

In the following excerpt Augustine is treating the disaster which
befell Troy. Troy and the Greeks worshipped the same gods, so why did the gods
destroy Troy? And if Apollo was really a diviner, why did he work for Priam’s
father Laomedon, who promised him money but in the end broke that promise and
gave nothing, huh?

Augustine, De Civitate Dei,
book 3, chapter 2. I have left out the last part in order not to make it too
long, but the translation below is complete.

videant: let them (i.e. those who think that the Roman gods have taken
revenge) see. What Augustine is rhetorically asking is what is worse: to believe
in such stupid gods or to swear falsely (peiero+dat.) them.

credunt: i.e. those who believe in
the Roman gods

erubesco erubui:to redden, be ashamed of

Translation by Marcus Dods (1950):

First, then, why was Troy or Ilium, the cradle of the Roman people
(for I must not overlook nor disguise what I touched upon in the first book ),
conquered, taken and destroyed by the Greeks, though it esteemed and worshipped
the same gods as they? Priam, some answer, paid the penalty of the perjury of
his father Laomedon. Then it is true that Laomedon hired Apollo and Neptune as
his workmen. For the story goes that he promised them wages, and then broke his
bargain. I wonder that famous diviner Apollo toiled at so huge a work, and
never suspected Laomedon was going to cheat him of his pay. And Neptune too,
his uncle, brother of Jupiter, king of the sea, it really was not seemly that
he should be ignorant of what was to happen. For he is introduced by Homer (who
lived and wrote before the building of Rome) as predicting something great of
the posterity of Æneas, who in fact founded Rome. And as Homer says, Nep tune
also rescued Æneas in a cloud from the wrath of Achilles, though (according to
Virgil )

All his will was to
destroy

His own creation, perjured
Troy.

Gods, then, so great as Apollo and Neptune, in ignorance of the
cheat that was to defraud them of their wages, built the walls of Troy for
nothing but thanks and thankless people. There may be some doubt whether it is
not a worse crime to believe such persons to be gods, than to cheat such gods.
Even Homer himself did not give full credence to the story for while he
represents Neptune, indeed, as hostile to the Trojans, he introduces Apollo as
their champion, though the story implies that both were offended by that fraud.
If, therefore, they believe their fables, let them blush to worship such gods;
if they discredit the fables, let no more be said of the "Trojan
perjury;" or let them explain how the gods hated Trojan, but loved Roman
perjury. For how did the conspiracy of Catiline, even in so large and corrupt a
city, find so abundant a supply of men whose hands and tongues found them a
living by perjury and civic broils? What else but perjury corrupted the
judgments pronounced by so many of the senators? What else corrupted the
people's votes and decisions of all causes tried before them? For it seems that
the ancient practice of taking oaths has been preserved even in the midst of
the greatest corruption, not for the sake of restraining wickedness by
religious fear, but to complete the tale of crimes by adding that of perjury.