The Colts and Zimbabwean Eco-Devo

May 18, 2011

For release noon May 18 and thereafter (673 words)

A friend with an office in the Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Building, a poor man’s John Galt from “Atlas Shrugged,” has a poster on his wall that could be signed by Ayn Rand herself — a framed copy of “Zimbabwean Corn Production 1975-2007.” His explanation to a visitor serves as an education in economic development, or un-development.

The chart is made up of data points representing annual production beginning the year of Zimbabwe independence, he begins. It is there as a reminder to be skeptical about official economic development (eco-devo in bureaucrat lingo), even and especially when promoted close to home.

He will point out the year 2002 on the chart. That’s when the production figures, defying weather, dropped below all but the worst drought years. That was the beginning of Zimbabwean “Land Reform,” in truth the official degradation of private property.

But isn’t it hyperbolic to relate anti-colonialism in the African Corn Belt to the machinations of the Capital Improvement Board, the Metropolitan Development Commission or the Indianapolis mayor’s office?

Perhaps, but you still will want to consider the chronicle of the N.K. Hurst Bean Company. Its negotiations with the city of Indianapolis under threat of eminent domain were, let us say, Zimbabwean.

Fred McCarthy, the former president of the Indiana Manufacturers Association, has built a case file on the company, a local business whose misfortune was to sit on land “needed” for a more politically connected one, i.e., a then high-riding professional football franchise known as the Colts.

McCarthy’s reports for the Foundation for Economic Education and on his blog, Indy Tax Dollars, challenge anyone to argue that Hurst would have been any worse off dealing with a Third World totalitarian. McCarthy notes that the terms of Hurst’s final agreement with Indianapolis require the company to ask official permission for the most basic business transactions regarding the property — and to do so for 30 years.

Colts boosters might contend that the comparison is raw, that City Hall is more economically savvy than the Zimbabweans and certainly better intentioned.

Really? History tells us that whenever and wherever private property becomes a matter of political negotiation rather than written law there is disaster. Keep in mind that the property rights of N.K. Hurst were compromised not for a road or a sewer but for an entertainment venue. Whether or not the Hurst family is resigned to the agreement, other investors (job makers) are forewarned that in Indianapolis the official bar for justified theft is dissuasively low.

McCarthy, indeed, considers it a blot on the city’s history. “Surely this governmental bullying of small business, which politicians are so fond of claiming as the heart of the economy, would not be overlooked by a firm seeking a new site in our city,” he warns.

Back to the corn chart: A direct cause of the drop in production was the decision by the new “owners” of the confiscated land, the regime’s henchmen, to withhold investment. They well understood that politics had trumped property and that they could lose their new fortune on an executive whim. So they delayed planting, instead putting their cash and precious metals in foreign banks where it would be safe from people such as themselves.

Today, in supposedly more sensible Indiana, it is a good bet those making money off the grand boondoggles of our time — the stadiums, the convention centers and the music halls — will not be buying “seed corn” for planting here. Their money will go elsewhere, to places where the Rule of Law prevails over political faction, where a family business like is safe from crony capitalism or governmental shift.

The corrupt are corrupt, you see, not stupid. They ride in on horses named “Best Intentions,” “Inarguable Good” and even “Go Blue.” And, as John Galt knew, democracy without free markets and constitutional counterweight is no protection from them.

Check the corn chart. Consider Hurst Beans.

Craig Ladwig is editor of The Indiana Policy Review. He worked briefly as a foreign-policy aid to Sen. Nancy L. Kassebaum during the period that Zimbabwe was given its independence by the United Kingdom. A version of this articled was published in the Indianapolis Business Journal.

Connect with Us

Recent Posts

Our mission is to marshal the best thought on governmental, economic and educational issues at the state and municipal levels. We seek to accomplish this in ways that:

Exalt the truths of the Declaration of Independence, especially as they apply to the interrelated freedoms of religion, property and speech.

Emphasize the primacy of the individual in addressing public concerns.

Recognize that equality of opportunity is sacrificed in pursuit of equality of results.

The Indiana Policy Review Foundation is a non-profit education foundation focused on state and municipal issues. It is free of outside control by any individual, organization or group. It exists solely to conduct and distribute research on Indiana issues. Nothing written here is to be construed as reflecting the views of the Indiana Policy Review Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before the legislature or to further any political campaign.

The foundation's white papers are intended to make scholarly research on Indiana issues more widely available to policy analysts and researchers. White Papers represent research in progress and are published to invite comment and discussion as preparation for their submission to academic journals and other professional publications. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their research and analysis.