Pension front of Russia

Do not think that i will call for future retirees to the barricades. Moreover, the chances to settle down and to put pension reform on different rails of power still left. No wonder that media and social networks there was information that president Putin allegedly threatened prime minister Medvedev resign over the proposal to raise the retirement age. Just at the moment, it seems that the time has come to take a break. And not to scare elderly doubtful prospect of obtaining a thousand rubles a month.

And not to scare the young prospect never achieve nothing in the service because of all the warm places completely occupied by the elderly. Promising in the first part of notes to remember foreign experience, didn't think it we can be so much in demand. No, not the part paid to pensioners amounts – we will have to wait, it seems, a very long time. And part of the same raising the retirement age. It's no secret that, in addition to India and China, it managed to crank out virtually all countries with more or less decent life expectancy. However, none of the so-called civilized country the retirement age is not raised so quickly. Nowhere, i repeat nowhere, did not suit such a race for a pension as, for example, for men born in 1963, which is likely to fall term every year to receive the gift of another year of work without pension.

Well, women and worse — because they want to add just eight years old, and catch-up will have to play a greater number of citizens in the age. What is called: feel young again! by the way, by increasing the retirement age at least twice as smoother than in russia, in most European countries was able to ensure that the social insurance part of the pension was either equal or superior to the cumulative. It is this measure helped bring down the passions, as in France and Germany, and even in the most successful from the point of view of the effect of the reform, Sweden experienced a very dangerous trend. With the beginning of the reform there is a sudden splurge a non-state pension funds. I had to take action not only for the freezing of savings, but also the development of the whole system of compensation to clients of bankrupt funds, and retirees among civil servants. Just these days the Russian finance ministry finally resulted in more or less distinct calculations, what amount he plans to save due to invalid pensioners. And also due to the increase in vat from 18 percent to 20 percent.

Apparently, even in the finance ministry finally realized that it was time to speak honestly, directly and, alas, not strictly with duma members and officials, and ordinary citizens, which someone willing in fact, to shamelessly steal. The Russians have long been accustomed to share. During the crisis they shared earned with the oligarchs, which could leave them without work. And then shared with the same finance incentives in exchange for a measly penny for monetization. Also in a crisis, only to have the world, they shared even with the greeks, cypriots and icelanders, whose pension is actually many times more than they themselves.

And now they can endure one more need to share, but for now just want to say to them simply and honestly. So, according to the calculations of subordinate anton siluanov, pension, unpaid for those who had to receive them in 2019, but is unlikely to receive, given in 2019, according to the calculations of ministry of finance, only 9. 3 billion rubles savings. Minfinovsky transfer of mandatory pension insurance only in 2021 will reach a decent size — the savings are quite substantial 156,3 billion. And then it will be more and more, while the country would miss the target by our lawmakers of the high accomplishments of the retirement age. Many people will immediately ask: so was it worth the game worth the candle? of course, there are doubts. But in the sleeve of the ministry of finance there is another source of retirement money.

It is only planned and all agreed the vat increase next year should provide additional federal budget 633,5 billion rubles in 2020 and 2021 – 678 728 bln and bln, respectively. There are, however, doubts that the increase of vat will really supplement the budget, including the pension, but the ministry of finance, it seems, does not matter. There is a completely different question. And all those billions should provide an increase to pensions, 36 million Russians just a thousand rubles a month? it is here that you count everything a breeze, remember raykin: "100 thousand for one ruble, that's crazy money!" so 36 billion 12 months in a row – a total of 432 billion. Where will the rest go? the decision of what social problems? as mentioned another classic koroviev mouth: "Congratulations you done lied". However, catching the finance ministry on a lie — a thankless task.

It is better to put him with someone as an example. The same swedes at least. In Sweden puzzled pensions in 1913, but only in 70-e years the number of those who qualify for a pension, joined the last squad of elderly swedes – civil servants who are called "Blue collar". But 35 years earlier in Sweden, have tried to equate the pension rights of the poor and the rich. It was then in the country with payments to the pension fund was adopted absolutely unthinkable for russia, the system is "Pay what you can".

And oddly enough, it worked. Instead of a dubious charity, some of the auctions and shows, the pension fund took money without asking where they're from someone came from. You can, of course, to regard it as a "Washing" and promote shady business, but it works almost still. After the second world war, from participation in which Sweden wisely declined, there came again to power, the social democrats went to the sharp increase in basic part of pensions. And again it worked.

Although someone from among the wealthy swedes, of course, grumbled a bit. At the same time introduced supplements to pensions for housing – to on the streets was not homeless. And again it worked. Appeared in towns and villages hostels and hostels, our standards are comparable in terms of rural housing for the xxi century. In the early 60's in Sweden first took to calculate the pension the 15 best years of the pensioner's salary.

We have done the same just now, but somehow forget about it, in fact, serious help remind on all corners. On the threshold of the third millennium, the swedes decided to reform when the pension is divided into three parts: the guaranteed pension, a so-called income pension and premium pension. Guaranteed retirement pay to those who in life had no luck – never worked, but to give such citizens the state does not want, as then tinker with them just are more expensive. The premium pension is given to those who accumulated it himself, or something he deserved. It is something like the soviet desktops. Well, the pension income to pay all swedes, and it is calculated from 16 percent of the salaries and all other earnings.

Of the 16 only, mind you, the swedes somehow lacking, and we have 28 percent of the wage funds will lead to pensioners some pennies. Such a ratio only makes to talk about that without decent wages, decent pensions, simply can not be. And the last: for all the swedish reforms, significant increases in retirement age there was never. I repeat, was not! never! the retirement age in Sweden now – only 61 years, and today discussed his rise on the year. Just for you! a heated debate about it in the press, and in all power structures.

So maybe we should not so rush? and to stay somewhere in the area 62 and 57, at least 58 in.

Facebook

Twitter

Google+

Pinterest

Comments (0)

Recently on the "IN" was published a series of articles one of the regular contributors to the website, Andrew from Chelyabinsk. The cycle was called "How to build a strong economy of Russia" and was dedicated to various issues of...

Given the depletion in the foreseeable future of the traditional fields of energy resources, currently under development, increasingly important becomes the topic of creating not only alternative energy sources, but also the devel...

When Donald trump was knocked out of Emmanuel Macron to the exit from the EU, because this organization, "worse than China", he meant primarily Germany. This country, which is the de facto leader of a United Europe, is growing irr...