An incorporated society must have at least 15 members , the members file their constitution and run their society according to the constitution.

As can be seen by the dates of formation various communities had individuals who came together and formed the intention of forming a local SPCA for the common good of the community

Often farmer brown gave a corner paddock and the local trades men go together and constructed a premises for the volunteers to work out of . The societies were names the “what ever” society for prevention of cruelty to animals, the assets came from the community and were for the benefit of that community .

Each society acted independently until a federation was formed which lent a common voice and support structure to all .

Neil Wells was involved in action which appears to have substituted the Federation for the RNZSPCA , possibly by a name change which is no longer recorded at the registry of societies.He also wrote the animal welfare act and made the provision for inspectors to be employed by the RNZSPCA and introduced offences which are almost impossible to defend ( strict liability )

The federation disappeared and the RNZSPCA became the national body effectively having one representative from each of the member societies.

A move then occurred to change member societies into branches and a number of branches were taken over by stealth by a group of persons whose objective was to disenfranchise the members and substitute their own constitution for that previously accepted and passed by the members. Hence the members no longer had control of their own society it was some one else’s rules

The particular victims of this mover are the following branches

KAITAIA AND DISTRICTS BRANCH OF THE ROYAL NEW ZEALAND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INCORPORATED

Taupo Branch of The Royal New Zealand Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Incorporated

Te Kuiti Branch Of The Royal New Zealand Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals, Incorporated

The Bay Of Islands Branch Of The Royal New Zealand Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Incorporated

The Bay Of Islands Branch Of The Royal New Zealand Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Incorporated

The Central King Country Branch Of The Royal New Zealand Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Incorporated

The Feilding and Districts Branch of the Royal New Zealand Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Incorporated

The Hokitika Branch Of The Royal New Zealand Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Incorporated

The Horowhenua Branch Of The Royal New Zealand Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Incorporated

The Marlborough Branch Of The Royal New Zealand Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Incorporated

The Te Awamutu Branch of the Royal New Zealand Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Incorporated

The Thames Branch Of The Society Of Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Incorporated

The Waihi Branch of the Royal New Zealand Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Incorporated

The Wairoa Branch Of The Royal New Zealand Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Incorporated

The Wanganui Branch of the Royal New Zealand Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Incorporated

Waikato Branch Of The Royal New Zealand Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Incorporated

Wairarapa Branch Of Royal New Zealand Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Inc

Persons posing as officers of these societies did so without any mandate from the members , they effectively took over the assets of that society and dealt with them as though they had a right to do so. In some instances property including real estate was sold , there is no evidence as to where the funds went .

There is no provision in law which would support this action and in reality I believe that these persons are committing fraud by holding themselves out as having legitimacy over the asserts and running of the societies they have taken over.

These persons who include the following have had absolutely no legal right to act in the manner which they have yet have bamboozled volunteers and members alike , taking advantage of the fact that most ordinary citizens don’t know that the people from the so called Head office who they trust were actually setting them up to take over their society and asset strip the local community .

Andrea Midgen

Bice Awan

Clive Poles Smith

David Broderick

Francine Shields

Gordon Sean Cooney

Gordon Trainer

Marie Hall

Robyn O’Fee

Sean Cooney

Stephen Glassey

Theresa Gattung

those above have been assisted by those who should know better Geoff Sutton employed by the RNZSPCA is a former MPI man and he and his mate Alan Wilson ( also x MPI) are very keen to see the inspectorate kick into play as this would ensure them a position in the new order. These persons have a vested interest as they have been assured a position in the new order and are looking after their own financial interest in the new structure

It has to be remembered that the” P” stands for prevention not for prosecution and by the time prosecution occurs the animal has already suffered .

so essentially the SPCA is no longer functioning as the society it was set up for and instead being a society which relies on animal abuse for its existence.

In Britain the SPCA is out of control a great face book page to follow on that one is the shg

an article on the dangers of the SPCA inspectorate is https://www.spectator.co.uk/2013/02/off-the-leash/# Does the RSPCA think it’s the FBI?

Dozens of ordinary householders have been convicted, fined and even tagged for offences such as killing squirrels in their gardens, or not arranging adequate veterinary care for a sick pet. Those animal owners who fall foul of the RSPCA include the elderly, sick, bewildered or poor. Some of the prosecutions have been little short of farcical. Householders who kill garden pests have been convicted on the basis that the only humane way to dispatch a squirrel is to take it to the vets for a £70 lethal injection. Worse, there is a growing suspicion that not all RSPCA evidence of cruelty is what it seems.

Wake up NZ we need to educate people and care for the animals . Those taking control are lawyers and accountants it is a power game and more animals than ever will be put down and caring owners will be the target of prosecutions.

If you do nothing then you are part of the problem , Please help prevent cruelty not make cruelty the aim of financial gain.

Please contact me we are working on something that will hopefully restore integrity to the SPCA’s nation wide

Transparency New Zealand is a voluntary organisation . We are not funded in any way other than by Donations
If you support our work and wish to see us continue please support us with your donation. Thank you
account number 01-0258-0045994-00