6 comments:

Why is Kirsten not listed in the Best Overall Performer category? She wiped Julie out 74% to 11% for Outstanding Young Performer. Yet Julie got 1% for Best Overall Performer and Kirsten is not listed. Was she even listed in that category during the voting? If not, then the whole thing has no credibility. She might have beat Bradford's 18%.

we are moving into the third phase on the dankies.. The first phase is nominations. Kirsten must not have gotten enough votes in that category to move on which is why her name is not listed. She didn't have enough vote in the first bit.

Well that just seems weird. I just notice stuff like that. I'm still betting they forgot to list her in that category. She's obviously top 5 on the show for popularity. If you could only vote once in each category. Maybe that means Spixie fans just voted for Bradford? Regardless here's hoping Bradford wins the 5 categories he's in by himself and with Kirsten.

I see. So why is Julie listed in both the Outstanding Supporting Actress and Outstanding Younger Performer categories? But Kirsten isn't. Julie is 25 years old and Kirsten is 24. Do you have to be 25years old to qualify for Oustanding Supporting Actress? Which then would qualify you for Outstanding Overall Performer. Then that would explain it.

Seems to me otherwise Kirsten should have also been in the other categories too.