I believe Hollinger's rankings take +/- point differential, schedule and strength of opponents into account. So the fact that the Raptors have lost sooooo many close games (2 by 1 point, 1 by 2 points, 1 by 3 points and 2 overtime losses) to mostly really good teams (playoff teams last year and projected to be playoff teams this year) makes the Raptors a lot better than their record otherwise suggests.

I think his rankings reflect the same sort of optimism that so few of us RR Raptors fans seem to have these days. Contrary to popular belief in many threads, the sky isn't falling... yet.

The rankings here don't reflect the actual ratings he gives them. Looks like ranking order is actually by strength of sched for some reason.

I think there's a link that will take you to the explanation and logic/rationale behind his system. He tries to show ratings that are more reflective of where teams will end up, than just where they are today. So, if you played lots of good/playoff teams in the first half of the season and picked up more losses than wins, the theory is that you'll pickup more wins than losses in the second half, since you'll play more games against bad/lottery teams.

Which is fair, considering they've had a really hard schedule and have the league's 2nd worse record at the moment. Anything much higher would be a little crazy and anything lower wouldn't seem to reflect how competitive we've been in most games.

I believe Hollinger's rankings take +/- point differential, schedule and strength of opponents into account. So the fact that the Raptors have lost sooooo many close games (2 by 1 point, 1 by 2 points, 1 by 3 points and 2 overtime losses) to mostly really good teams (playoff teams last year and projected to be playoff teams this year) makes the Raptors a lot better than their record otherwise suggests.

I think his rankings reflect the same sort of optimism that so few of us RR Raptors fans seem to have these days. Contrary to popular belief in many threads, the sky isn't falling... yet.

Aaaaaand, boom goes the dynamite. Its nice to have empirical evidence to support these sentiments. I will repeat my comment from another forum. This is a good team with a bad record. We'll be just fine...hopefully

Aaaaaand, boom goes the dynamite. Its nice to have empirical evidence to support these sentiments. I will repeat my comment from another forum. This is a good team with a bad record. We'll be just fine...hopefully

Aaaaaaand, boom here comes reality.

That is 9th based on strength of schedule. Do you really think the Raptors are better than the Thunder?

Good teams win more often than they lose regardless of opponent. Period.

I will repeat a comment from numerous forums: this is a bad team tied for the 2nd worst record in the NBA. Numerous people, myself included, have been saying, "We'll be just fine.... hopefully" for 5 years now. I think the Raptors will be fine..... eventually, but not without meaningful change. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. If that is true then a lot of Raptor fans and its management are freaking insane.

That is 9th based on strength of schedule. Do you really think the Raptors are better than the Thunder?

Good teams win more often than they lose regardless of opponent. Period.

I will repeat a comment from numerous forums: this is a bad team tied for the 2nd worst record in the NBA. Numerous people, myself included, have been saying, "We'll be just fine.... hopefully" for 5 years now. I think the Raptors will be fine..... eventually, but not without meaningful change. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. If that is true then a lot of Raptor fans and its management are freaking insane.

orrrr after Hollinger's demar derozan and raptors sucks comments, demar and kendrick lamar might have given a conference call from Compton asking him whats up?

I believe Hollinger's rankings take +/- point differential, schedule and strength of opponents into account. So the fact that the Raptors have lost sooooo many close games (2 by 1 point, 1 by 2 points, 1 by 3 points and 2 overtime losses) to mostly really good teams (playoff teams last year and projected to be playoff teams this year) makes the Raptors a lot better than their record otherwise suggests.

I think his rankings reflect the same sort of optimism that so few of us RR Raptors fans seem to have these days. Contrary to popular belief in many threads, the sky isn't falling... yet.

I believe Hollinger's rankings take +/- point differential, schedule and strength of opponents into account. So the fact that the Raptors have lost sooooo many close games (2 by 1 point, 1 by 2 points, 1 by 3 points and 2 overtime losses) to mostly really good teams (playoff teams last year and projected to be playoff teams this year) makes the Raptors a lot better than their record otherwise suggests.

I think his rankings reflect the same sort of optimism that so few of us RR Raptors fans seem to have these days. Contrary to popular belief in many threads, the sky isn't falling... yet.

Orr Matt:

Matt52 wrote:

Aaaaaaand, boom here comes reality.

That is 9th based on strength of schedule. Do you really think the Raptors are better than the Thunder?

Good teams win more often than they lose regardless of opponent. Period.

I will repeat a comment from numerous forums: this is a bad team tied for the 2nd worst record in the NBA. Numerous people, myself included, have been saying, "We'll be just fine.... hopefully" for 5 years now. I think the Raptors will be fine..... eventually, but not without meaningful change. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. If that is true then a lot of Raptor fans and its management are freaking insane.

..On this particular subject, I definitely side with CRF.

Good Team, Bad Record.

"That was Nasty right? Cocked that Joint back and banged on 'em." -James Johnson

I believe Hollinger's rankings take +/- point differential, schedule and strength of opponents into account. So the fact that the Raptors have lost sooooo many close games (2 by 1 point, 1 by 2 points, 1 by 3 points and 2 overtime losses) to mostly really good teams (playoff teams last year and projected to be playoff teams this year) makes the Raptors a lot better than their record otherwise suggests.

I think his rankings reflect the same sort of optimism that so few of us RR Raptors fans seem to have these days. Contrary to popular belief in many threads, the sky isn't falling... yet.

That is 9th based on strength of schedule. Do you really think the Raptors are better than the Thunder?

Good teams win more often than they lose regardless of opponent. Period.

I will repeat a comment from numerous forums: this is a bad team tied for the 2nd worst record in the NBA. Numerous people, myself included, have been saying, "We'll be just fine.... hopefully" for 5 years now. I think the Raptors will be fine..... eventually, but not without meaningful change. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. If that is true then a lot of Raptor fans and its management are freaking insane.

So what you're saying matt is that all the people for the past 5 years calling for bargs to he traded are actually insane and you've fallen through the rabbit hole? Haha