Corporate raids and terrorism of Russian Federation. “Boyko’s Rigs” as an indicator of maritime military challenges

The war between Russia and Ukraine doesn’t take place only along the demarcation line in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The Russia-annexed Crimea and the territorial waters of Ukraine, especially its maritime economic zone, are also areas of active military and political confrontation. About it not to talk aloud, because unlike the ATO area where politics and the media often shift the focus from the Russian aggression towards separatism, then the invader appears in its true form and demonstrates a disregard for all norms of international law and treaties. The occupied Crimea is being transformed into a militarized zone and a staging ground for Russian “muscle-flexing” that threatens not only Ukraine, but also other countries of the Black Sea region.

Russian Federation not only occupied and annexed Crimea but also captured Ukrainian property in the Black Sea. The international volunteer community InformNapalm conducted several OSINT-related investigations of illegal armed seizure of two jack-up rigs “Peter Godovanets” and “Ukraina”, owned by the Ukrainian company “Chornomornaftohaz” and better known in Ukrainian media as “Boyko’s rigs”.
Our first investigation showed that soldiers of the 104th Airborne Assault Regiment of the 76th Airborne Division of the Russian Army participated in the seizure.

The second investigation shed light on further actions of Russian Federation on the removal of the rigs from the Odessa shelf gas field escorted by boats of the Russian Federal Security Service and a missile boat of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. Also, based on the research of social profiles conducted by volunteers of InformNapalm, it was established that the rigs were guarded by the servicemen of the 25th regiment of GRU special operation forces and the 810th marine brigade of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation.

In the third investigation of this series, an expert, the chairman of the supervisory board of the organization “Maidan of Foreign Affairs” and the Chief Editor of BlackSeaNews Andrei Klimenko commented on the situation resulting from the Russian operation on removal of Boyko’s rigs and revealed its details.
InformNapalm also found that soldiers of the 126th Separate Brigade of coastal defense of the Russian Black Sea Fleet participate in the rotations serving on the rigs.

Based on the volunteer investigation, on February 5, 2016, the member of Ukrainian parliament Andriy Teteruk submitted an official inquiry to several of the Ukrainian authorities, including the Office of the General Prosecutor, the Security Service, the Interior Ministry and the State Border Service of Ukraine.
Here are a few points from the official responses to the inquiry by the authorities (the full text of the inquiry and the responses can be found at link):

Main Investigation Department of the General Prosecutor’s Office investigates the criminal case number 12014000000000164 dated 04/01/2014 regarding the fact of misappropriation of government property during the purchase of two jack-up rigs “Peter Godovanets” and “Ukraina”. The Pechersk district court in Kyiv had imposed arrest on the specified equipment in order to prevent its illegal transport, relocation, or sale. Pre-trial investigation is continuing, and is under the personal control of the leadership of the General Prosecutor’s Office.

On 12/14/2015 the Investigation Department of the National Police started a pre-trial investigation of the relocation of two jack-up rigs to the territorial waters of the Crimean Peninsula annexed by the Russian Federation.

On 12/15/2015 State Border Service of Ukraine carried out a special operation to verify the information concerning the change of location of “Boyko’s rigs”. The activities confirmed and documented the relocation of the rigs by the Russian counterpart from the area of Odessa gas field in the direction of Karkinit Bay in the Crimean Peninsula and their current location 12 miles from the its shore.

The information about the relocation of the jack-up rigs “Ukraina” and “Peter Godovanets” was confirmed by the information bulletin “Notice to Mariners” published by Russia, №50/15 and №51/15.

The administration of the Border Service of Ukraine reported the location of the jack-up rigs to the President of Ukraine, the Prime Minister of Ukraine, the National Security Council, the GPO, the Armed Forces General Staff of Ukraine, the Security Service of Ukraine.

As we can conclude from the responses, the Ukrainian authorities are simply confirming the facts of seizures of Ukrainian property, while doing nothing to prevent them from happening. But let’s try to understand: could Ukraine prevent the removal of costly jack-up rigs and the illegal gas production at the Odessa field? What is the current condition of Ukrainian Navy and can it effectively respond to the invasion? Let’s be objective and analyze the situation.

The volunteers of InformNapalm community managed to interview a direct participant of the events related to the removal of the Ukrainian rigs from Odessa gas field in December 2015. Our interlocutor was Petty Officer 1st Class Nikolay Parkhomenko.

We met Nikolai thanks to a publication on the website www.peoplesproject.com concerning a raid of the Ukrainian ship “Netishin” to the area of Odessa gas field. In the photo and video we can see the Project 12417 missile corvette”Shuya”, hull number 962, of the Black Sea Fleet guarding the area around the gas platform “Tavrida” which replaced “Boyko’s rigs”.

What do you know about the incident with the seizure of rigs in December 2015? Is it true that our border guards were intercepted by a boat of Federal Security Service and a missile boat of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation?

On December 12 2015, “Netishin” urgently put to sea with the location of the rigs as the destination of its mission. It was known that the capture of our rigs could be expected in this area. A similar mission was assigned to the ship “Pereyaslav” based in Ochakov. When we approached the rigs on December 15, our path was blocked by the project 22460 border patrol boat “Amethyst”, hull number 055. My commander on “Netishin” requested 055 to provide their goals and objectives in the area of our rigs. They answered that we should better leave the area. My commander reminded 055 over the radio that we were in Ukraine’s economic zone, but received a repeated order to withdraw. Next we were approached by the Russian missile boat “P-109” hull number 952, which, by maneuvering, demonstrated its readiness to attack us. We signalled battle stations alarm on board, while the Russian boat approached to a distance of 100 meters. We did not flinch, but we received the order from the Ukrainian South Naval Base in Mykolaiv to withdraw, and we left the area. Later it was reported in Russian press that on that day they “took away” the rigs. We did not see our ship “Pereyaslav” probably it was in an area where there were our other rigs.

For reference:April 2, 2014 the Border Guard Department of Russian Federal Security Service was formed in the Republic of Crimea.

Since the annexation of the Crimea the fleet of the Coast Guard of the Federal Security Service has been renovated:

On October 13 2014 a group of four Project 12150 “Mangust” patrol boats, hull numbers 633, 634, 635, 636, arrived in Balaklava. Prior to that, border patrol ships of the Russian Coast Guard were on duty for the protection of sea borders around the Crimean Peninsula, but were not based in Crimea.

In December 2014, the Federal Security Service’s Border Administration in annexed Crimea received the Project 12200 border patrol boat “Sobol”, hull number 217.

In April 2015, the Project 22460 patrol boat “Zhemchug”, hull number 503, was added to the Coast Guard fleet in Crimea. This is a small displacement ship capable of taking a helicopter on board and using it at sea.

On May 05, 2015 the Coast Guard the Project 22460 boat “Izumrud”, hull number 504. A ship with such a small displacement is able to take on board a helicopter and use it in the sea.

On June 30, 2015 same type boat “Amethyst”, hull number 055, was delivered to Crimean border guards.

In March 2016 it was reportedthat the Coast Guard units in Crimea were expecting deliveries of ten more ships and boats.

It is worth noting that on December 12, 2015 the naval base of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol was supplemented with ships “Zelenyj Dol” and “Serpukhov” (project 21631), equipped with long-range missile complex “Calibr-NK”, infamous for the strikes on Syrian territory conducted from the Caspian sea.

Apparently our fleet, and especially its border security, is not in the best condition, if we put it mildly, while the Border Administration of the Russian Federal Security Service in Crimea has received a number of new combat boats over the past couple of years What kind of answer could Ukraine offer?

As I said before, during the incident with the seizure of our rigs by Russians we were met by two Russian missile boats: Project 12417, hull number 962, and Project 12411, hull number 952, which control the area, and the Federal Security Service patrol boat 055. At that time, on board the “Netishin” we only had one DShK heavy machine gun and 20 AKS-74, so we did not represent any threat to the Russian boats. The “Pereyaslav” was armed only with automatic rifles, therefore it was also not dangerous to the Russians. Today Russians de facto control the line almost up to the Zmiiny island.

How do border guards of the Federal Security Service and Russian military behave when Ukrainians attempt to approach the rigs?

During our latest trip, as can be seen in the photos, the Russian missile boat 962 pursued us and then followed us for two days. It also maneuvered to demonstrate that it was not desirable for us to approach the rig within 2 miles. As far as we know there are also Russian snipers on the rig.

Does the Ukrainian government pay enough attention to its fleet, and what do you think is missing?

I think, the ships that are now deployed at sea to guard the borders should be better equipped with monitoring devices, including AIS (Automatic Identification System – in navigation, a system used to identify vessels, their size, heading, and other data via VHF radio – ed.) and radars, and of course with weapons. When we go with machine guns against missile boats, it is just ridiculous. In April 2016, we expected to have two grenade launchers installed on our ship, we welded the mount points for them, but neither us ( “Netishin”) nor “Pereyaslav” ever received them. And it still remains this way.

That’s how sad the situation has been and remains in our maritime economic zone in the Black Sea. We hope for the best and that our fleet will be refurbished and modernized, not to mention the new ships.

Just recently Irina Fris, the head of the subcommittee on the security of government information systems of Verkhovna Rada Committee on National Security and Defense, noted that:The recently celebrated Day of Ukrainian Navy made us revisit our concept of the further development of the Ukrainian Navy and the feasibility of ordering new frigate class ships. Currently Russia is deploying the modern “Bastion” systems in Crimea, which greatly reduces the effectiveness of large ships. Thus in our economic conditions the strategy of the Navy development must first of all respond to the current challenges and the situation in the Black Sea… The preference for small, agile, fast attack ships should form the concept of the development of the Ukrainian Navy”.

But the question of security and respect of international law in the Black Sea region is a problem not only for Ukraine. The enemy that knows that its victim is not able to fight back acts more aggressively and boldly. Therefore the improvement of the equipment and military readiness of our fleet is a very serious question. The economy of Ukraine, which opposes the hybrid aggression of the world’s largest country, may not be able to quickly address the issue of procurement of ships and weapons at its own expense. But in regard to the issue of the protection of international law and the existing system of international security, many developed countries can and probably should support Ukraine. Ukraine is now in a situation when its territory is an obstacle to aggressive imperial ambitions. Once this outpost falls, the borders of other European countries will be exposed to such a dangerous neighborhood.

While national security experts continue their discussions and build their concepts of further restoration and equipping of the Ukrainian Navy, Ukrainians themselves have for a long time been raising funding to equip the navy. Through crowdfunding and incredible dedication of ordinary Ukrainians, who donated their savings to support the army, in 2014 we managed to stop the advance of the aggressor. But the battles for the liberation of the occupied and annexed territories are yet to come. Whether we fight in the battlefields or participate in political games, the Ukrainian Army must have the most modern and sophisticated weapons to deter the enemy that understands only the language of force.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name*

Email*

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Search for:

Donbas in Flames

Read the latest book “Donbas in Flames. Guide to the Conflict Zone” published by Prometheus Center. This guide will be useful to journalists, researchers, war experts, diplomats and general readers seeking information on the war in Donbas.

Archives

The Use of Force against Ukraine and International Law

Attribution CC BY

This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. This is the most accommodating of licenses offered. Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials.