The author is a Forbes contributor. The opinions expressed are those of the writer.

Loading ...

Loading ...

This story appears in the {{article.article.magazine.pretty_date}} issue of {{article.article.magazine.pubName}}. Subscribe

Steve & Apple Inc. (Photo credit: marcopako )

There are significant differences between the two of course, but is Samsung becoming the more sought after of the two? Is Samsung becoming what Apple once was, a company that everybody looks to as a model?

And the iPhone has a lot to do with why Apple became so admired.The iPhone changed Apple and changed our ideas about how a business can function.

Want to enter new markets with new products? Those are adjacency moves, outside your core competency - do it? And while you're at it scale up your business through community (Apple's apps developers) rather than capital investment.

That's what made Apple so admired and that admiration was reflected in people's search activity. "iPhone" is still a benchmark for most searched product.

If you look at global search interest now, people search Google for "iPhone" about twice as much as they search for "Apple" the brand. Search interest is like a popular vote for Apple - or the iPhone, every day.

If you look at the first graph (on page 2) you will see Apple (blue), iPhone (red) and Samsung (yellow) plotted against each other. Search interest in "Samsung" long ago exceeded search interest in Apple.

And you can see in the second graph it has now reached more or less the same levels of interest as we see in "iPhone", except when there is a spike around an Apple product launch.

They won best device manufacturer and best Best Mobile Enabled Consumer Electronics Device for the Galaxy camera, and Best Mobile Infrastructure for Smart LTE Networks (they also won the CTO Choice award for their LTE technology).

Actually, the difference between the two makes a comparison unfair on Samsung. Apple is much less diverse and arguably worse positioned for the next generation of connected devices such as the TV.

In the US, highly admired companies like Apple and Google are also highly specialized and dominant on a single track - they also tend to steer clear of manufacturing in favor of design and software. That means they have done some phenomenal customer engagement (iTunes, Apps Store, Play, Google +) and earn what might seem like easy dollars.

That's great as far as it goes but Samsung makes things. It sells 31 million flat panel TVs a year, making it the world's largest by market share. So while Apple and Google dream about a role in TVs, Samsung is a dominant force.

Samsung also spends research dollars on the nitty-gritty of infrastructure and components, positioning itself against low cot producers in 4G infrastructure. It is also a pioneer in physical storage devices. It has a 40% market share in DRAM and NAND Flash where companies like Sony and Apple are its major customers. It has 26% of the global LCD market and 97% of Active Matrix OLEDs.

Hewlett Packard, DELL, Verizon and AT&T are all major customers for Samsung components. Samsung meanwhile is supporting the development of the Tizen OS for mobile phones, an HTML 5 based open source project that will shift the balance of power in mobility away from the device app store to the networks, a move that looks set to be the next disruption in smartphones. Samsung is restless, jut like Google.

It is also becoming an astute user of social media (dating back to 2010 and its rise in public sentiment) and advertising, showing the world that Asian companies can also hire smart creative agencies. Apple sits above social media.

In fact Samsung have also moved into ad platforms (how? - Hire someone in the Valley) and are now looking at a content strategy to support their devices.

Samsung is in fact what American companies should aspire to be, ranging across products and components and bringing employment and prosperity to people who engage with it.