On Wednesday 12 November 2003 07:26 pm, Karl Zilles wrote:
> John J Lee wrote:
> > Well, I guess they already have, in the sense that O'Caml has a .NET
> > implementation -- right? Always assuming that implementation is more
> > than the publicity stunt that the Python one was, of course...
>
> You're referring to F#. It appears to be more of a research project
> than a full fledged implementation:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=fa.qe3mh18.1p1m8jk%40ifi.uio.no
Cc: Don Syme
I'm curious why F# (as I understood it), implements Caml from scratch instead
of just changing the bytecode compiler in Caml a bit to suite its needs.
By the way, are there benchmarks comparing code produced by ocamlc, ocamlopt
and F# (together with SML.NET and SML/NJ for that matter) on a variety of
algorithm and numerics-intensive tasks?
IIRC, when .NET/C# just came out, there were claims that it was almost as fast
as C.
--
Oleg Trott <oleg_trott@columbia.edu>
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners