The purpose of this treatise is to make an exposition of the
true gospel of salvation only by the faith in the precious sacrifice of Jesus
and to expose the vicious nature of the Dan Corner’s
false doctrine of The Believer's Conditional Security, which is
also the title of a book of him; he have key parts of that book published in
the web; so I have taken part of his chapter 5 from
http://www.evangelicaloutreach.org/initial.htm September 2004 to make a point
of launching of the exposition; I don’t cover all that chapter but only used it
to begin the exposition to touch many foul things that Corner is teaching in
his entire web site; I have not touched all his bad things, but the
considerableamount of bad things here
exposed are more than enough to destroy the structure of his error and to
expose the unreliability of Dan Corner as a true interpreter of Scripture.

Suppose we have a structure of dominoes, a building resting
on some few bases; suppose you retire one of those bases abruptly and the
construction collapses at all; then the building is destroyed, the dominoes are
spread. Well, the writings of Dan Corner will be our construction of dominoes,
and we shall remove more than a single domino, we shall remove very many of his
bad interpretations of passages; at the end, once that many false
interpretation had been totally disapproved and exposed in his vicious nature,
ALL HIS DOCTRINE COLLAPSES completely, the same as a construction of dominoes!
In fact, his chapter 5 is about the concepts of initial salvation and final
salvation, as Dan Corner understands them, it is a BASIC element of his
construction, one of the keys of all his false doctrine of the believer's
conditional security. Dan Corner, arrogantly and naively, boasts his book will
never be refuted by saying "The Believer's Conditional Security will
not be refuted!" I shall show many of the erroneous thing Dan has settled
as his proofs and the error of his entire book will be recognized, so all his
doctrine and book are demolished here by the Bible and are deprived of force and
exposed as it is, a heap of rubble and of garbage, the garbage of a false
gospel and a trap for the souls to make them to rest upon their proper works
and not upon the Lord Jesus Christ and His finished work.

Let us clarify the following thing first, the Bible speaks
of an initial salvation and of a final salvation, there are many initial
salvation facts and many final salvation facts; in the Bible the concepts of
initial salvation and final salvation exist. We are not refuting the existence
of the initial salvation and the final salvation, we are refuting Dan Corner's
false concepts on both. We are lifting the true biblical concepts against the
Dan Corner's false concepts. And the result will be:

2 Corinthians 10:5

Casting down
imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge
of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

The Bible has plenty of passages talking about initial
salvation and final salvation, and the same ones contradict what Dan Corner has
to say.

Dan Corner is risking heavily the precious souls of the
unsaved people, and misrepresenting the saved ones. I shall be attacking the
false doctrine of conditional security of the believers, which is a trap for
Dan and his victims.

OS (ONCE SAVED): INITIAL SALVATION

AS (ALWAYS SAVED): FINAL SALVATION
INCLUDED

The
first Dan’s presentation of his misguided concept of Initial Salvation:

Dan Corner begins his chapter 5 presenting his false
concepts on initial and final salvation. First he presents what is for him the
initial salvation. It is remarkable that, in his first presentation of initial
salvation, the unbiblical aspects that he will introduce latter are out of
view. Seems as in his words presenting initial salvation Dan Corner fear to
mention the UNBIBLICAL hard things he have added later to his first
presentation. But the hard unbiblical things concealed first by Dan Corner and
presented in his whole writings can be revealed by the Bible and are shockingly
heretical:

Because Dan Corner himself takes charge of to present in his
book that his "initial salvation""refers
to the moment in time when a person extends a trusting-submitting faith in
Jesus Christ for his personal salvation"but a faith which is not
un-perishable, "and thereby instantly receives the gift of
salvation" but an initial salvation which doesn’t secure final salvation. "At
this same moment in time he also passes from spiritual death to life" but an eternal life
which is neither secured for ever nor securer of final salvation, "from
darkness to light and from the power of Satan to the power of God" but with the possibility
that through temptation Satan may to push the Christian from the power of God
so causing the Christian to be eternally damned. "Such a
person is also set free from the slavery of sin"but not free from a future possibly
damnation by the sins from which he is supposedly free. "As
a recipient of eternal life", but an eternal life which is neither secured for ever nor
securer of final salvation, "he
has also been declared righteous in God's sight", but that declaration is neither
definitive nor unchangeable, "and made a son of God", but whit the
possibility of to be eternally damned equally, "because
of his faith in Christ, who is now his Lord and Savior” but not the perfect
Saviour we know.

That is the Dan Corner's initial salvation in all its full
sad reality, as he sustains it in his whole writings.

The
consequent Dan’s presentation of his misguided concept of Final
Salvation:

Then, Dan Corner follows presenting his false concept of
final salvation saying "Final salvation simply refers to
entering the kingdom of God, which only occurs for those who die physically in
a righteous state or are in such a spiritual state when the Lord returns." This false concept
affirms there is not security of final salvation all the way in the life of a
true believer in Christ, because the final salvation only is assured by the
final state of the Christian at his dead or at the Lord's return. The key of
this false concept is in the word "only" in "entering the kingdom of
God, which only occurs for ... "; you can see it; Dan Corner says
"entering the kingdom" ONLY occurs as a "final salvation".
Is it true? Is it true the entering the kingdom ONLY occurs as a final
salvation? Is Dan Corner saying a truth or is he erring making us to err and
fail? What does the Bible say?

The
true concepts of Initial and Final Salvation:

The Bible says:

Colossians 1:13

Who{the
Father}hath delivered us from the power of darkness, andhath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son

Then Dan Corner is wrong. He said us that the entrance into
the kingdom is ONLY the final salvation, while Paul the Apostle say us that God
the Father hath translated us into the kingdom of
his dear Son. Can you see it? Can you see how Dan is wrong? (For all who like to
check the Greek text there are for "hath
translated us" an Aorist Tense, Active Voice, Indicative Mood; then
we have that "hath translated us" is
an actual past fact in the life of the true believer, not a future one, not a
conditioned one by a future fact, not an hypothetical one, etc., verily, verily
an actual past fact in the life of the true believer) Paul the Apostle really
say us that God the Father hath translated us
into the kingdom of his dear Son.

Now it is opportune to enter the true biblical concept of Initial
Salvation
but only as it arises from the words of Paul the Apostle. Initial
Salvation, according to Colossians 1:12-13, simply refers to entering into
the kingdom of God, which occuredreally in a past time of the life of the true believer, the first time
he has believed, or as Dan said “to the
moment in time when a person extends a trusting-submitting faith in Jesus
Christ for his personal salvation”; thus the language of the Apostle speaks as if we
the true believers are now into the kingdom thus assuring us
with his strong language we shall enter the final phase of the kingdom at last.

That is to say: THE FINAL SALVATION IS
COMPLETELY SECURED BY THE PAST INITIAL SALVATION OF THE TRUE BELIEVER.

Dan Corner failed saying the initial salvation doesn’t
secure the final salvation. Paul the Apostle has led us saying the initial
salvation secures the final salvation. Whom will you believe? It is time to listen
always the Apostle Paul.

Colossians 1:13

Who{the
Father}hath delivered us from the power of darkness, andhath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son

Glory to God!!! Alleluia!!!

Then, after having erasedthe footprints of our present entrance into the
kingdom, Dan follows saying the Christian now "is
somewhere between his past conversion experience and his future entrance into
the kingdom, that is, assuming he endures to the end" making us to err in speaking only of our future entrance
into the kingdom and ignoring again the decisive statement of Paul upon our present translation into the
kingdom:

Colossians 1:13

Who {the
Father}hath delivered us from the power of darkness, andhath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son

“hath translated us
into the kingdom of his dear Son” is declared a fact by Paul,that is, a past fact in the life of the
believer and then not dependent on a future condition as that supposed by Dan
Corner: "assuming he endures to the end". Conversely, because the
Christian has been translated “into the kingdom of his dear Son”, his present
faith is un-perishable, Dan speaks of a faith, which need
to be maintained to endure to the end, the Word of God speaks us of a faith,
which is essentially un-perishable, differently of gold,
which is essentially perishable:

1 Peter 1:7

That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be
tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the
appearing of Jesus Christ:

Then, when the Lord says: "he
that endureth to the end shall be saved" (Matthew 10:22; 24:13), he
is speaking not of a Dan Corner's "condition for" but of a biblical
"resultant fact", the resultant fact resulting from the intrinsically
un-perishable faith of the true believer as Peter has said. We can
conciliate the Scripture, Dan cannot. The Lord says us also:

Luke 21:17-19

17 And ye shall be hated
of all men for my name’s sake.

18 But there shall not an hair of your head perish.

19 In your patience
possess ye your souls.

He says "But there shall not{double emphatic negation}an hair of
your head perish", it is a statement of a fact
which will occur without failing, the Lord uses the Greek double emphatic negation
"ou mh", meaning "in no way". The commandment
"In your patience possess ye your souls"
is then of secured accomplishment because "there
shall not{that is, "in no way"}an
hair of your head perish". So, the
Christian has been translated into the kingdom of His dear Son, his
present faith is un-perishable, Dan speaks of a faith which need
to be maintained to endure to the end, the Word of God speaks us of a faith
which is un-perishable. Whom will you believe?

The
Dan’s blindness on the verses he himself is quoting:

Then, Dan Corner follows saying: "In
other words, though he now possesses eternal life, he is also on the road that
leads to [eternal] life (Mt. 7:14 cf. Mt. 25:46) with the possibility of{then
follow a list of bad works, many of them referred to unbelievers, that
supposedly can cause the loss of eternal life}"; hereis a citation of Scripture he uses
not seeing it is plainly contrary to his position, in Mathew 7:13-14 the Lord
says that those not finding the strait gate are the lost, not
those who have found the strait gate:

Mathew 7: 13, 14

13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate,
and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go
in thereat:

14 Because strait is the
gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

But Dan Corner is confounded and only cause to confuse us
speaking as if a true believer having found the strait gate may become lost.

Can you see it? Can you see how Dan Corner is wrong? Note
carefully how the Lord says that those NOT FINDING the strait gate are the
lost, NOT THOSE WHO HAVE FOUND the strait gate; while Dan Corner is speaking us
of how those who have found the strait gate, who are in the road leading to
eternal life, may become lost. Whom will you believe? Dan Corner or the Lord?
Dan quotes also Mt. 25:46: "And these shall go away into everlasting
punishment: but the righteous into life eternal." Do you believe someone
of the few the Lord make saved for finding the strait gate will be between those
into everlasting punishment? Dan does. The Lord DOESN’T. The Lord contrasts two
opposite things, the finally lost and the finally saved, the finally lost as
not finding the strait gate, the finally saved as finding the strait gate.

It is now opportune also notice that finding the strait gate
is not the final salvation but it is the
initial salvation. The strait gate is the entrance to the road leading to
eternal life (eternal life is here the final salvation); because the Lord
associates and unites the gate to the road; moreover perhaps the road is a
constituent part of the gate because the Greek word “pulee” for gate is the
word used for “pass” as the pass through mountains; the objective thing is the
Lord mentions two feminine Greek words “gate” and “road” and finally, without
denoting which of them He is referring to, He says that “few there be that find it”, where the “it” (in Greek) is a
feminine pronoun referring to the gate or the road or both (the distinction is
unimportant because the gate implies the road). And here is the remarkable thing,
the Lord makes finally saved (final salvation) all entering the strait gate
(initial salvation), and He makes finally lost those not finding the strait
gate; or in other words, THE LORD MAKES INITIAL SALVATION NECESSARY AND
SUFFICIENT TO ATTAIN FINAL SALVATION!!!! Do you see it? Dan Corner doesn’t.
Please, again note the Lord is saying us those NOT FINDING the strait gate
(initial salvation) are the lost, NOT THOSE WHO HAVE FOUND the strait gate
(initial salvation); while Dan Corner is speaking us of how those few in the
road having finding the strait gate (initial salvation) may become lost. Whom
will you believe? Dan Corner or the Lord?

We have now two passages teaching us that final salvation is
assured by initial salvation, we increase here our presentation of biblical
initial salvation:

Initial Salvation, according to Colossians
1:12-13, simply refers to entering the kingdom of God, which occurs really in a
past time of the life of the true believer, the first time he has believed;
thus the language of the Apostle speaks as if we the true believers are now into the kingdom, thus
assuring us with his strong language we shall enter the final phase of the
kingdom at last. That is the same as presented by the Lord in Mathew 7: 13, 14,
initial salvation is to find the strait gate, and it is presented by the Lord
as necessary and sufficient to attain final salvation.

Then, not having perceived the words of the Lord, who make
finally saved (final salvation) all entering the strait gate (initial
salvation), Dan Corner follow directly contradicting the Lord by saying "with
the possibility of wandering off ... etc.", and so he is saying us the true
believer can lose his salvation, because he add "then
Dear reader, even if you are a true Christian this horrible thing could happen
to you also, unless you do certain things to prevent it, according to
Scripture!”; clearly the horrible thing Dan is threatening us with is
his imaginary idea of a true believer having found the strait gate but that may
losse his salvation. But the Lord said us a contrast between two opposite
things, the finally lost and the finally saved, the finaly lost as not finding
the strait gate, the finally saved as finding the strait gate and in the road
to eternal life. I wonder, if Dan found a gate which gave him not assurance of
final salvation, which gate is it? It is not the strait gate the Lord spoke
us!! Is Dan in the road leading to eternal life?

So, when Dan Corner quotes verses he doesn’t see the
implications of some of these verses. Another example: Romans 6:22, quoted when
he said that at INITIAL SALVATION "Such a person is also
set free from the slavery of sin", which is a verse teaching that FINAL SALVATION IS
SECURED BY INITIAL SALVATION ONLY:

Romans 6:22

But now being made free
from sin {aorist tense, a closed and terminated
past act}, and become servants to God{aorist
tense, a closed and terminated past act}, ye have{present tense, indicative mood, present and uninterrupted
possession}your fruit unto holiness, and the end{final
salvation}everlasting life {The
complete expression is literally, according the Greek: “ye have the fruit of
you unto holiness and [ye have] the end [which is] everlasting life”}.

We have here two closed and terminated past acts, being made
free from sin and become servants to God, and the results of those past
completed acts are therefore not dependent nor conditioned on another future
thing; because those are said only to depend on those past completed acts;
those results from those past acts are the fruit unto holiness and the end,
which is everlasting life, being the latter the FINAL SALVATION. Then, we have
here that the FINAL SALVATION IS ONLY DEPENDENT ON TWO PAST ACTS OF INITIAL
SALVATION, NOT UPON FUTURE CONDITIONS THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THE BELIEVER.

Again we can increase our presentation of initial salvation:

Initial Salvation, according to Colossians
1:12-13, simply refers to entering the kingdom of God, which occurs really in a
past time of the life of the true believer, the first time he has believed;
thus the language of the Apostle speaks as if we the true believers are now into the kingdom, thus
assuring us with his strong language we shall enter the final phase of the
kingdom at last. That is the same as presented by the Lord in Mathew 7: 13, 14,
initial salvation is to find the strait gate, and it is presented by the Lord
as necessary and sufficient to attain final salvation. And by Romans 6:22 we
have the final salvation is secured by two closed and terminated initial
salvation past acts:being made free
from sin and become servants to God; again initial salvation is securing final
salvation.

John 8:32-36 is also quoted when Dan said that at INITIAL
SALVATION "Such a person is also set free from the slavery
of sin";
curiously enough, Dan didn’t note the powerful implications of these verses,
which teach that once a person became a son of God, he remains always a son of
God, and that being a son of God is equated to be free from the slavery of sin.
Here is the passage; I have highlighted the words speaking of the “ALWAYS”:

John 8:32-36

32 And ye shall know the
truth, and the truth shall make you free.

33 They answered him, We
be Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye
shall be made free?

35 And the servant
abideth not in the house for ever: but the
Son abideth ever.

36 If the Son therefore
shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

On this passage there are a good commentary from
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown:

35. And
the servant abideth not in the house for ever, but the Son abideth ever—that
is, "And if your connection with the family of God be that of
BOND-SERVANTS, ye have no natural tie to the house; your tie is essentially
uncertain and precarious. But the SON’S relationship to the FATHER is a natural
and essential one; it is an indefeasible tie; His abode in it is perpetual and
of right: That is My relationship, My tie: If, then, ye would have your
connection with God’s family made real, rightful, permanent, ye must by the Son
be manumitted and adopted as sons and daughters of the Lord Almighty." In
this sublime statement there is no doubt a subordinate allusion to Ge 21:10,
"Cast out this bondwoman and her son, for the son of this bond-woman shall
not be heir with my son, with Isaac." (Compare Ga 4:22-30).

Now a good commentary from Barnes:

Verse 35. The servant abideth not, &c. The servant does not, of
course, remain for ever, or till his death, with his master.If he is disobedient and wicked, the master
sells him or turns him away.He is not
the heir, and may at any time be expelled from the house of his master. But a
son is the heir. He cannot be in this manner cast off or sold. He is privileged
with the right of remaining in the family. This takes place in common life. So
said the Saviour to the Jews: "You, if you are disobedient and rebellious,
may at any time be rejected from being the people of God, and be deprived of
your peculiar privileges as a nation. You are in the condition of servants, and
unless you are made free by the gospel, and become entitled to the privilege of
the sons of God, you will be cast off like an unfaithful slave." Comp. He
3:5,6.

Abideth not. Remains not, or has not
the legal right to remain. He may at any time be rejected or sold.

In the house. In the family of his
master.

For ever. During the whole time of
his life.

The Son. The heir.He remains, and cannot be sold or cast off.

Ever. Continually. Till the
day of his death. This is the privilege of a son, to inherit and dispose of the
property.

Now a good commentary from The Four Fold Gospel:

Joh 8:35

And the bondservant
abideth not in the house for ever: the son abideth for ever. For light on this
passage read Ga 4:19-21. Slaves have no permanent relationship to a house, and
may be changed at will. God was about to dismiss the Jews as unfaithful slaves
(Lu 20:16-19). Sons, on the contrary, have a permanent relationship to the
house, and if a son take one into fraternal adoption, he communicates to such a
one his own perpetuity (Ro 8:2).

THE TRUTH ABOUTDAN CORNER’S

MISUSED VERSES

Now, here are the passages Dan twist to frighten the true
believers saying "then Dear reader, even if you are
a true Christian this horrible thing could happen to you also, unless you do
certain things to prevent it, according to Scripture!",1 Tim. 6:10,21; 2 Tim. 2:18; 2 Pet. 2:15; Jn. 6:66; 1
Tim. 5:15; Lk. 8:13; Mt. 11:6; 26:31; Mt. 24:10; 2 Thess. 2:3; 1 Tim. 4:1; 2
Tim. 4:4, 2 Peter 3:9. We shall see the true interpretations of these passages
and others Dan twist contradicting Paul, Lord's Apostle, and the Lord Himself,
there will be also some few verses misused by other different people, not
necessarily Dan Corner. Other misused passages will be treated all along this
treatise, not only in this part of the treatise

The 1 Timothy 6:10
case:

Dan have not problem to quote this verse 1 Timothy 6:10 as
if it were a proof for his false doctrine, saying also:

112. Did
Paul personally know of some Christians who were eager for money and
consequently wandered from the Christian faith (1 Tim. 6:10)? ___Yes ___No

For the love of money is
the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the
faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. {erred: or, been
seduced}

This passage don’t affirm the faith of a true Christian can
perish, because if so, it would be a contradiction of the following direct
statement that the faith of a Christian is un-perishable:

1 Peter 1:7

That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be
tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the
appearing of Jesus Christ

The "they have erred from the
faith" from 1 Timothy 6:10 need to be interpreted without
contradicting the direct statement of 1 Peter 1:7; Dan Corner does not that; he
is incapable of present an interpretation without contradicting the direct
statement of 1 Peter 1:7. The "they have erred
from the faith" is a very general statement which cannot be
rendered as if it is speaking of a faith which perished; and to render it so
would be contrary to 1 Peter 1:7. Is by 1 Timothy 6:9we know it may be the case of a not converted one who doesn’t
have salvation and not attains true faith by the seduction of money (the original
Greek says literally "they has been seduced away
from before the faith"; the Greek word used here for "they has been seduced" is the same as "to seduce" in Mark 13:22:

Mark 13:22

For false Christs and
false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.

Where "to seduce"
can be translated by his synonym "to deceive". Yea, it may be the
case of a not converted one as in the following case:

Mark 4.18-19

18 And these are they
which are sown among thorns; such as hear the word,

19 And the cares of this
world, and the deceitfulness of riches, and the
lusts of other things entering in, choke the word, and it becometh unfruitful.

By the way, without referring the case of 1 Timothy 6:10,
there are the possibility of a true converted one which fails temporarily and
is confounded or offended temporarily in his faith but even so his faith
doesn’t perish:

Matthew 26:31-35

31 Then saith Jesus unto
them, All ye shall be offended because of me this
night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of
the flock shall be scattered abroad.

32 But after I am risen
again, I will go before you into Galilee.

33 Peter answered and said
unto him, Though all men shall be offended because of thee, yet will I never be
offended.

35 Peter said unto him,
Though I should die with thee, yet will I not deny thee. Likewise also said all
the disciples.

Luke 22: 31-32

31 And the Lord said,
Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:

32 But I have prayed for
thee, that thy faith fail not: and when
thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.

Yea, a true believer with an un-perishable faith may be
offended and sifted temporarily, but as his faith is un-perishable, the Lord
will sustain it un-perishable, the faith doesn’t fail never; "But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not" is a statement saying that the Lord is
responsible that the true faith doesn’t fail (the Greek word for "fail" is a verb in present tense so is an
uninterrupted faith here spoken of). Suppose you are a true believer in the
Lord, but suppose you err and fail, even so your un-perishable faith doesn’t
fail, IS UN-PERISHABLE ACCORDING TO 1 PETER 1:7!!!Dan may present you his typical "examples", but the
Bible present us its proper examples of temporarily failing true believers whit
un-failing faith. Whom will you believe, Dan or the Bible? There are many
mentions of failing in the Bible, some for unbelievers, some for true
believers, some for both (and some are difficult to say for whom); but Dan
Corner is very hurry to ignore 1 Peter 1:7, Matthew 26:31-35, Luke 22: 31-32,
and the true biblical concept of decisive initial salvation, and to apply
nearly all cases of failing to true believers, then conveniently for his false
doctrine he could put true believers under a perdition proper to unbelievers.
But he is deflecting us again and again, he is concealing from us that the true
believer has un-perishable faith, as 1 Peter 1:7 says and ignoring the true
biblical concept of decisive initial salvation.

The same confusing pattern Dan Corner applied to 1 Timothy
6:10 will be applied again an again. The case of 1 Timothy 6:21 is better
treated at the following section because it contains a different Greek word
than the 1 Timothy 6:10 verse, and it is not convenient to be guided by the
translations of Dan Corner who frequently uses a same translation for different
words robbing us the nuances of these words, even more, he uses bad
translations not mirroring the true meaning of the Greek.

The 2 Timothy 2:18, 1
Timothy 1:3-6 and 1 Timothy 6:20-21 case:

Dan has not problem to quote this verses as if they are
proofs for his false doctrine, saying:

Don’t be
deceived!According to Scripture, it is
possible to: ………wander away from the
faith (1 Tim. 6:10,21)

Don’t be
deceived!According to Scripture,it is possible to: … wander away from a pure
heart, a good conscience and a sincere faith and turn to meaningless talk (1
Tim. 1:5,6)

(www.evangelicaloutreach.org\tragedies.htm,
Possible Spiritual Tragedies Between Initial and Final Salvation)

Now we shall see the truth:

2 Timothy 2:18

Who concerning the truth
have erred {a same Greek word for “erred"}

, saying that the
resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.

Again, this passage don’t affirm the faith of a true
Christian can perish, because if so, it would be a contradiction of the
following direct statement that the faith of a Christian is un-perishable:

1 Peter 1:7

That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be
tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the
appearing of Jesus Christ

The "overthrow the faith of
some" from 2 Timothy 2:18 need to be interpreted without
contradicting the direct statement of 1 Peter 1:7; Dan Corner does not that;
again he is incapable of present an interpretation without contradicting the
Bible. The "overthrow the faith of some"
is a very general statement which can not be rendered as if it is speaking of a
true faith which perished; and to render so would be contrary to 1 Peter 1:7. A
true believer may to have his true and un-perishable faith temporarily
overthrown as Peter during his failing at the negation episode; let us return
to the case of Peter and the rest of the disciples:

Matthew 26:31

Then saith Jesus unto
them, All ye shall be offended because of me this
night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of
the flock shall be scattered abroad.

And the Lord said, Simon,
Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:

We can see the disciples were offended and sifted, and even
we can say that his faith was shacked to the fundaments, and as they were offended
we can say that his faith was overthrown (as in 2 Timothy 2:18); but as his
faith is un-perishable, the Lord sustained it un-perishable, the faith doesn’t
fail never; "But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not" is a statement saying the Lord is responsible
that the true faith doesn’t fail (the Greek word for "fail" is a verb in present tense). The Greek word
for "overthrow" in 2 Timothy 2:18 is
the same word used in Titus 1:11 and translated "to subvert", which
is the translation used in the Spanish version of Reina-Valera 1909 at 2
Timothy 2:18, and can be rendered "to upset", "to disrupt",
"to disturb"; there are no doubt the disciples were very disturbed
and subverted the sad night Peter denied the Lord; but no one of them lost his
faith. Now, only we need to point out the disciples have not IN them the Holy
Ghost, but the Holy Ghost was WITH them at this point in his lives before the
Spirit descent in them at Pentecost:

John 14:16-17

16And I will pray the Father, and he shall
give you another Comforter, that he may abide with
you{ Greek: between you}for ever;

17Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world
cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him;
for he dwelleth withyou {Greek: at your side}, and shall be in
you {Greek: in you}.

So the Peter and disciples case is exceptional because they
were believers approaching the time of the Holy Ghost indwelling, a thing never
seen before in the Old Testament times; so the Arminians, when putting Old
Testament examples of “believers that lost the Spirit, or the faith, or the
salvation”, are showing their sad ignorance of the difference between a New
Testament believer and an Old Testament believer. For the New Testament
believer only remains the redemption of his body; but for the Old Testament
believers it was remaining the redemption of their souls and of their bodies;
it is a great difference that the Corners of the world ignore, as they ignore
many things. We hope with faith the redemption of our body (Romans 8:23) which
will be the complement of the salvation of the soul (the believers which are
asleep are hoping the redemption of their bodies too as a final aspect of
salvation for their saved souls), but the Old Testament believers hoped with
faith the redemption of their soul and body, the souls of the dead believers of
the Old Testament were in a subterranean place contiguous to the hell (Luke
16:19-30), they were well, but they were not still in heaven, and the paradise
was below, because the way tothe
holiest of all was still not open (Hebrews 9:8); only when the Lord was
deadand the precious blood of the New
Covenant was spilt and He was resurrected as our priest that way was open
(Hebrews 10:16-20) and the believers at the paradise were translated to the
heaven (The paradise then below: Luke 23:43; the paradise now in the third
heaven 2 Corinthians 12:2-4).

As for the “Who concerning the
truth have erred” of 2 Timothy 2:18, it can be easily applied to any one
that is teaching false doctrine, be it a true believer or not, and depending on
the truth that it is being contradicted we can suspect the true state of the
contradictor. For example, there are many true believers contradicting the
postribulational truththat the Church
will be taken to Christ AFTER the Great tribulation, pretribulationist are
erring concerning the truth, but that is not a very serious erring. But there
are the Dan Corners saying that the salvation of the believers is conditional
and not finally secured, making so the salvation to depend on works, then very
sadly, the Dan Corners are most probably unbelievers because they don’t believe
in the true gospel but they believe a false gospel and then they are most
probably lost, concerning the truth they have erred
seriously. In the 2 Timothy 2:18 case we probably have a serius erring
undermining greatly the doctrine of the believers resurrection at the second
coming of Christ (perhaps a sort of Preterist). The same criterion applied to 2
Timothy 2:18 can be applied to the following verses:

1 Timothy 1:3-6

3As I besought thee to abide still at
Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they
teach no other doctrine,

4Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies,
which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.

5Now the end of the commandment is charity
out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:

6 From which some having
swerved{the same Greek word for “erred"}

1 Timothy 6:20-21

20O Timothy, keep that which is committed to
thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science
falsely so called:

21 Which some professing
have erred {the same Greek word for “erred”}concerning the
faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

So are void of force the following statements of Dan Corner:

{About 1 Timothy
1:3-6:}

After all
of that, Paul sadly refers to some, whom he knew, that wandered
away from the same kind of pure heart and a good conscience and a
sincere faith that he had, which testifies beyond all doubt to the fact
that they were previously saved.

Timothy, guard
what has been entrusted to your care. Turn away from godless chatter and the
opposing ideas of what is falsely called knowledge, which some have
professed and in so doing have wandered from the faith. Grace be with
you. (1 Tim 6:20, 21)

Finally, another warning of life or
death magnitude is given about godless talk and teachings that are
contradictory to Scripture, which could lead to the spiritual downfall of even
Timothy himself

The Dan Corner’s “wandered … ” is a very bad
translation for the Greek word for “erred”: astocheo as-tokh-eh’-ofrom a compound of “a” (as a negative
particle) and stoichos (an aim); miss the aim. Then is a false conclusion that
some having missing the aim ofa pure
heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeignedwere then true
believers; the conversely is the better, those which have not “a pure heart,
and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned” they are who may not to
reach them or may to miss that aim, so as an archer can miss his target not
reaching it. Also is a false conclusion that some having erred concerning “the faith” were true
believers; the conversely is the better, some one not having “the faith”, such one
may to miss it, so as an archer can miss his target not reaching it. And why
Timothy did need to avoid the profane babblings? Obviously because that can
upset his faith, but not because that can eradicate absolutely his
un-perishable faith (1 Peter 1:7). Nevertheless Dan Corner prefers the bad way
selecting a reason that contradicts the plain Scripture of 1 Peter 1.7.

The 2 Peter 2:15
case:

2 Peter 2:15

Which have forsaken the
right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor,
who loved the wages of unrighteousness

We can affirm that Peter is speaking here of UNBELIEVERS,
NOT OF BELIEVERS WHO HAVE LOST HIS SALVATION. Dan has resulted here attempting
to make us believe Peter is speaking of true believers. That is not the case.
If we continue reading the passage we shall discover those men were not
believers. Let us put the entire passage, then I shall highlight the parts
showing us that those men were not believers:

2 Peter 2:15-22

15 Which have forsaken
the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of
Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;

16 But was rebuked for
his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man’s voice forbad the madness of the
prophet.

17 These are wells
without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest; to whom the mist of
darkness is reserved for ever.

18 For when they speak
great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh,
through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in
error. {clean: or, for a little, or, a while, as some read}

19 While they promise
them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man
is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.

20 For if after they have
escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and
Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the
latter end is worse with them than the beginning.

21 For it had been better
for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have
known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.

22 But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog
is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing
in the mire.

You see it, that those men were not sheep of the Lord; they
are called dogs and sows. They are not called sheep that turned to be dogs and
sows; they are called dogs that turned to his own vomit again, and sows that
were washed to their wallowing in the mire. Then they were not true believers,
because the Lord said us clearly that those remaining unbelievers are not of
His sheep; then the believers are His sheep:

John 10:26

Butye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said
unto you.

And Dan would make us to err by making us believe Peter is
here speaking of true believers! Again Dan Corner is very hurry to ignore 1
Peter 1:7, Matthew 26:31-35, Luke 22: 31-32, and the biblical concept of
initial salvation securing final salvation, and to apply nearly all cases of
failing of unbelievers to true believers, so conveniently for his false
conclusion he could put true believers under a perdition proper to unbelievers.
It is a typical pattern of Dan corner and his followers. A tricky pattern we now
know very well!!

I have found a case of a Dan Corner adherent following this
same pattern but applying it to "experience". The guy picked up
wordly guys, then will make them appear as true believers who had lost their
salvation; it is necessary for many to say "experience" doesn’t prove
a doctrine; there are MANY, MANY unregenerate unbelievers professing faith but
without salvation at all; we can experience the saying of their mouth, his
profession and temporary change, but latter we cannot experience from him the
evidence of a true conversion. But the Dan Corner's guys see those poor
unbelievers, then experience the saying of their mouths and their temporary
superficial change, then come to us saying that they have
"experienced" a true believer, then they later experience the
evidence of the state of perdition of those poor professing but unbelievers,
then come to us saying that they have "experienced" those guys lost
their salvation. It is the same tricky pattern Dan Corner showed for the 2 Peter
2:15 case, but applied to "experience".

From www.truthkeepers.com/osas.htm (taken at June 30, 2004),
an article by C. H.
Fisher, I have been reading that article and there are many unclear things,
again that tricky pattern. Fisher presents his proper "experience" as
a believer who lost his salvation:

First I want to tell you my personal experience of
how an individual can actually walk completely away from God and still believe
they are saved and on their way to heaven. Not only did I leave the church, I
abandoned God and went out into deep sin, yet all the time I thought I was
still heaven bound. While in a drug induced, drunken stupor, I would say the
Lord's prayer every night before I went to sleep. I believed that saying the
Lord's prayer covered my sins and I would be accepted into heaven if I died in
my sleep. However, one day I realized that I was in fact headed for hell if I
did not change my life. I go into more detail about my past and my salvation
experience in my testimony {link to www.truthkeepers.com/testimon.htm}. When God saved me, I had a complete
change inside and out. There was no doubt in my mind that if I had died before
this change I would have went straight to hell.

But, OH SURPRISE!!!! While he said us "Not only did I leave the church, I abandoned
God and went out into deep sin, yet all the time I thought I was still heaven
bound",
Having read his testimony I have found it:

I didn't really know much about the devil at that time
or his various religions. Although I was raised in a Baptist church and said
the Lord's Prayer every night I could think of it, I didn't know anything about
God either.

If he didn't know anything about God, how in the world he
can present himselfas a Once Saved
that his salvation? How in the world? Answer: BY THE TRICKY PATTERN OF to apply
nearly all cases of failing of unbelievers to true believers, so conveniently
for his confusing view he could put true believers under a perdition proper to
unbelievers. It is a typical pattern of Dan corner and his followers. A tricky
pattern we now know very well!!

And here an important and opportune issue rises, so as a
true believer can fail (Peter at the negation episode) so an unbeliever can
"un-fail" (the men of 2 Peter 2:15). Those men, Peter say us,
"have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the
Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ", and even more, they "have known the
way of righteousness" and they have received "the holy commandment
delivered unto them". But those men NEVER WERE SAVED, Peter calls them
dogs and sows returning to their proper filthiness. It is important to explain how people apparently Christian
become apostate. The apostasy is a phenomenon proper of unbelievers; it is not proper
of believers. Remember, true believers have experienced the initial salvation,
which assures them final salvation.

And that the true believers are never to be apostates became
evident also because his faith is un-perishable (1 Peter 1:7).

So the apostasy is a phenomenon of unbelievers returning to
their old lives after having experienced temporarily the benign influence of
the gospel and the Holy Ghost, but having experienced neither true faith nor
initial salvation nor regeneration, apostasy is not proper of believers.

But Dan has not problem to quote this verse 2 Peter 2:15 as
if it were a proof for his false doctrine, saying:

Not
only did Peter know the believer’s security was conditional, but he boldly and
unequivocally taught that a true Christian can leave the straight way.
Some, however, refuse to accept this Scriptural fact and in opposition to it
parrot: They were never really saved to begin with. To live in the
straight way carries the same benefit as having escaped the corruption of
the world by knowing our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. But such a
person, who departs from the straight way, will then become entangled
and overcome by sin’s corruption again! It is about such former
Christians, who turn their backs on the sacred command that Peter
stated:

It would
have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness,
than to have known it and then to turn their backs on the sacred command
that was passed on to them.

(www.evangelicaloutreach.org\sin.htm,
The Slavery, Bondage and Controlling Power of Sin, Dan Corner)

It is interesting how Dan points the following, “But
such a person, who departs from the straight way, will then become entangled
and overcome by sin’s corruption again!” Yes, “again!” but Dan have failed
to notice (or perhaps he doesn’t want to notice) they are not called sheep that
turned to be dogs and sows; they are called dogs that turned to his own vomit again! and sows that were
washed to their wallowing in the mire. Then they were not true believers, because
the Lord said us clearly that those remaining unbelievers are not of His sheep;
then the believers are his sheep:

John 10:26

Butye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said
unto you.

So we can see we are not “parroting” they were not saved to
begin with; it is Peter himself who says it! By the way, it is a little strange
and comic to imagine Peter as a Dan Corner teacher of conditional security, all
I heard of Dan is that a true believer can lose his faith, while Peter the Apostle
said that faith is un-perishable (1 Peter 1:7). Dan and Peter were by different
ways!

Many false teachers unbelievers may be false teachers by
having forsaken the right way (2 Peter 2:15), but those are not the same words
nor the same thing that a true believer departing from the narrow way, which is
an idea directly contradicting the Lord Himself. We have seen this error of Dan
previously.

Mathew 7: 13, 14

13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and
broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in
thereat:

14 Because strait is the
gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

The Lord contrasts two opposite things, the finally lost and
the finally saved, the finally lost as not finding the strait gate and the
narrow way, the finally saved as finding the strait gate and the narrow way.
There are not such things as walkers of the narrow way reported as lost;
because the walkers of the narrow way are presented by the Lord as finally
saved in opposition to the finally lost of the broad road.

Without a doubt, Saul, Solomon and the unnamed disciples of Jn. 6:66
were all saved then later turned from God and never came back!

(www.evangelicaloutreach.org\notsaved.htm, "He Was Never Really
Saved To Begin With!" (Or Was He After All?), Dan Corner)

Now we shall see the truth:

John 6:66

From that time many of
his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

It is nothing new, it is the same pattern again and again;
Dan has make us to err by making us believe the Lord is here speaking of true
believers who went back. That is not the case. If we read the entire passage we
shall discover those men going back were not believers. Let us put the entire
passage, then I shall highlight the verse which shows us that those men going
back were not believers; as an established contrast, I shall highlight also the
verse which shows us that those men remaining whit Christ were true believers,
whit the pointed exception of Judas:

John 6:60-71

60 Many therefore of his
disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear
it?

61 When Jesus knew in
himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend
you? {offend: or, scandalize, or, cause you to
stumble}

62 What and if ye shall
see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

63 It is the spirit that
quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they
are spirit, and they are life.

64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the
beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.

65 And he said, Therefore
said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of
my Father.

66 From that time many of
his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

67 Then said Jesus unto
the twelve, Will ye also go away?

68 Then Simon Peter
answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.

69 And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of
the living God.

70 Jesus answered them,
Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?

71 He spake of Judas
Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it was that should betray him, being one of
the twelve.

Let us think about this statement at v.64, "But there are some of you that believe not"; it is a statement
directed to His disciples (v. 61); it is a statement of the Lord which has a
subject, "some of you that believe not",
unbelievers between His disciples; and a fact about such subject, about such
unbelievers between His disciples, is that they were between the disciples. And
if you think they were believers who ceased to be believers, you are mistaken,
please read the verse; after that Lord's statement about the actual presence of
unbelievers between His disciples, John give us a reason for such statement,
that is: "For Jesus knew from the beginning who they
were that believed not, and who should betray him." That is the reason why Jesus
maked such statement about the presence of unbelievers between His disciples,
the reason was not that some believers ceased to be such; the reason was that
FROM THE BEGINNING THEY WERE UNBELIEVERS, because the Lord "knewfrom the beginningwho they were that
believed not, and who should betray him." Moreover, the immediately
following statement of Jesus (v. 65) is the reason why were such unbelievers
between His disciples, the reason is that they have not yet come to Jesus:
"And he said, Therefore said I unto
you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father."

Now you can easily figure out whom were those going back, and
walking no more with Him. Yea, they were unbelievers, like Judas. But as for
the believers, those who have come unto Him, those given unto Him of His Father
ALL THEY WERE SAVED; read for yourself:

John 17:6

I have manifested thy
name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the
world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they
have kept thy word.

John 17:9

I pray for them: I pray
not for the world, but for them which thou hast
given me; for they are thine.

John 17:12

While I was with them in the
world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have
kept, and none of them is lost, but the son
of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled.

John 18:9

That the saying might be
fulfilled, which he spake, Of them which thou gavest me have I lost none.

“NONE” WAS WELL SAID “NONE”. Judas is not included between them which the
Father had given Jesus; moreover, Judas was included in v.64 as one of the
reasons whereforeJesus said "But there are some of you that believe not"; and then, for
Judas also is given the reason (v.65) why they (then Judas included) are
unbelievers, the reason is they have not yet come to Jesus (then Judas
included): "And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me,
except it were given unto him of my Father." So, Judas was not given unto
Christ of His Father according to v.64 and v. 65. So, dear reader, when
someone, Arminian, Methodist-Wesleyan, Assembly of God man or similar, would
come to you saying that Judas was a true believer who lost his salvation, don’t
believe him.

But as for the believers, those who have come unto Him,
those who were given unto Himof His
Father ALL THEY WERE SAVED. Then Dan Corner and his Arminian fellows
are WRONG presenting John 6:66 as a proof of believers that lost their
salvation.

As for Matthew 10:22; 24:13:

Matthew 10:22

And ye shall be hated of
all men for my name’s sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved.

Matthew 24:13

But he that shall endure
unto the end, the same shall be saved.

The Lord says: "he that
endureth to the end shall be saved", but he is speaking not of a
Dan Corner's "condition for" but of a biblical "resultant
fact", the resultant fact resulting from the intrinsically un-perishable faith of the true
believer Peter has said of. We can conciliate the Scripture, Dan cannot. The
Lord says us too:

Luke 21:17-19

17 And ye shall be hated
of all men for my name’s sake.

18 But there shall not an hair of your head perish.

19 In your patience
possess ye your souls.

He says "But there shall not{double emphatic negation}an hair of
your head perish", it is a statement of a fact
which will occur without failing, the Lord uses the Greek double emphatic negation
"ou mh", meaning "in no way". The commandment
"In your patience possess ye your souls"
is then of secured accomplishment because "there
shall not{that is, "in no way"}an
hair of your head perish" {sound like eternal security of salvation!}.

The
1 Timothy 5:15, and 1 Timothy 3:6 case:

Dan Corner using these verses:

Don’t be
deceived! According to Scripture, it is possible to: … turn away to follow
Satan (1 Tim. 5:15)

Dan is showing again his pattern to make believers to seem
unbelievers and to make unbelievers to seem believers; again he is confused.
¿Where is here something saying that a true believer is here losing his
salvation? That is only in the Dan's imagination. I have nothing to refute here
because here are nothing to refute, Dan is standing on an empty gap, again. He
is so exceedingly imaginative to read "some"
and to see believers losing his salvation! Beware, Dan is adding to the Word,
and is adding contradictory things, contradictory to the Scripture.

As for 1 Timothy 3:6 Dan says:

Passage
three is the following one:

He must
not be a recent convert, or he may become conceited and fall under the same
judgment as the devil. (1 Tim 3:6)

……….

Such a
violation on Timothy’s part could stumble the new Christian to the place where
he will be damned, just as the devil himself will be. (Rev. 20:10 shows the
devil’s end.) The word translated judgment in the NIV or condemnation
in the KJV has the meaning of damnation and is found in Jude 4,
describing the destiny of the teachers who change grace into a license for
immorality.

Again we have a Dan’s bad translation putting an
arbitrary sense and not the true words of the Greek; here is the most literal
translation:

1 Timothy 3:6

Not a neophyte, lest
being lifted up with pride he fall into condemnation of the devil. {Literal Translation}

We can now interpret it as an occasion for the devil to
condemn the believer for pride. But this devil’s condemnation has no effect upon
the salvation of the true believer (Romans 8:34); but that condemnation of the
devil can result in a hard trial for the un-perishable faith of the believer in
pride. Moreover, the word for “condemnation” is the same used at 1 Peter 4:17
referring to judgment upon the righteous, the house of God, as opposite to
eternal damnation of the unbelievers who are not from the house of God; at 1
Peter 4:18 it is said the righteous is saved; scarcely saved, but saved anyway;
which can be seen in the indicative mode used for “saved” (Is it not eternal
security?). Moreover, that here the devil is the executor of the damnation or
judgment upon the believer in pride, and not the sufferer or the judgment, is
evident by the verse following to 1 Timothy 3:6.

1 Timothy 3:7

Moreover he must have a
good report of them which are without; lest he fall into
reproachand the snare of the
devil.

(www.evangelicaloutreach.org\hell.htm,
Hell And Who Goes There, Chapter 23 of the book, The Believer's Conditional
Security by Dan Corner)

Do
NOT be deceived! According to the Bible, to enter the kingdom of God, after
initial salvation, you must: … Continue to believe or "fall away"
during a time of persecution (Lk. 8:13 cf. Mt. 13:21)

(www.evangelicaloutreach.org\kingdom.htm,
Do NOT be deceived! According to the Bible, to enter the kingdom of God, after
initial salvation, you must:)

Who
will be thrown into this ETERNAL FIRE? … Those who … don't continue to believe,
but "fall away" in time of TESTING (Lk. 8:13 cf. Mt. 13:21).

(www.evangelicaloutreach.org\salvtion.htm,
The Lake of Fire)

Now
we shall see the truth:

Luke 8:13

They on the rock are
they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root,
which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away.

Matthew 13: 20, 21

20But he that received the seed into stony
places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it;

21Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth
for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word,
by and by he is offended.

I shall put here a simple question, are these guys of Luke
8:13 presented as possessing an un-perishable faith as 1 Peter 1:7 says of true
believers? Again Dan is making unbelievers to pose as believers! By the way,
you may believe the Gospel as the truth, but your faith may be a not saving
faith, but a superficial and un-rooted one. Dan attempts to emphasize that
those men were true believers by saying:

To save
their doctrine, the eternal security teachers (the Scripture distorters)
sometimes amazingly argue that the people of Luke 8:13 only had a spurious or
false faith, but that is not the text speaking—just their own faulty
theology. Not only does Lk. 8:13 say such people did believe for a while, it
also states that they receive the word with joy. Real, genuine plant life,
likened unto spiritual life, sprung up from the word of God, which was received
with joy. The problem is such don’t continue with God because they fail the
test of persecution for godly living.

But to posses one or
two features of true believers makes no one to be a true believer, and the
Dan’s quoted case fails to fill the whole features of true believers, the Dan’s
“true believers” are un-rooted and fruitless, and that faith is temporary, and
even not honest,so that joy of the men of Lk. 8:13 and Mt. 13:20,21 is not a genuine joy of
an honest heart, but the superficial joy of a dishonest heart; so Dan is
exaggerating when saying “that they receive the word with
joy. Real, genuine plant life, likened unto spiritual life, sprung
up from the word of God, which was received with joy”; he is exaggerating and again he is hiding from us the truth,
now the sad truth is that those men were dishonest. But the true faith is
honest, rooted, fruitful and un-perishable. So make you honestly very profoundly
rooted in the word so you may be truly ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED. The invariable
result of true faith in Christ is to bear fruit for His glory.

Luke 8:15

But that on the good
ground are they, which in an honest and good
heart, having heard the word, keep it, and
bring forth fruitwith patience.

Matthew 13:23

But he that received seed
into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth,
some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.

John 15:5

I am the vine, ye are the
branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him {the
believer}, the same bringeth forth much
fruit: for without me ye can do nothing {the
unbelievers are without Christ (Ephesians 2:12)}.

John 15:16

Ye have not chosen me,
but I have chosen you{the believers, not the
unbelievers}, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should
remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may
give it you.

Galatians 5:22

But the fruit of the
Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,

Ephesians 5:9

(For the fruit of the
Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness and truth;)

Philippians 1:11

Being filled with the
fruits of righteousness, which are by Jesus Christ, unto the glory and praise
of God.

While those not having true faith are the fruitless:

Luke 8:13

They on the
rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have
no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away.{No
mention of fruit in contrast with the bearing fruit ones of Luke 8:15. Dan is
lost ignoring about it when saying: “Those on the rock are the
ones who receive the word with joy when they hear it, but they have no root.
They believe for a while, but in the time of testing they fall away (Lk. 8:13).

Comment: A true
believer can cease believing, according to the Lord Jesus! Such would make him
an unbeliever. (www.evangelicaloutreach.org\anothergospel.htm,
ETERNAL SECURITY IS ANOTHER GOSPEL, Dan Corner)”; he
doesn’t know even the most elemental rules of interpretation, he doesn’t know
that an interpretation cannot contradict clear statements such as 1 Peter 1:7
about the un-perishable faith of the true believer; then, about the false and
superficial temporary faith of Luke 8:13 and James 2:19 Dan is confused. Dan is
incapable of conciliate the Scripture!}

Matthew 3:8

Bring forth therefore
fruits meet for repentance{said by John the Baptist for
unbelievers, who still attained not repentance, the better translation is
“fruits of repentance”}

Matthew 3:10

And now also the axe is
laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth
good fruit{said
by John the Baptist for unbelievers, who still attained not repentance, a
continuation of the saying at Matthew 3:8}is hewn down, and cast
into the fire.

Matthew 7:19

Every tree that bringeth
not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire{the
same as the saying of John the Baptist for unbelievers}.

Matthew 21:43

Therefore say I unto you,
The kingdom of God shall be taken from you{the
Jewish unbelievers}, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits
thereof {the believers}.

Another of the many verses twisted by Dan Corner is John
15:2, by saying:

121. Did
Jesus teach that fruitless Christians are in danger of being "thrown
into the fire and burned" (Jn. 15:1-6)? ___Yes ___No

Perhaps for those who were once
saved, but afterwards ...get cut off
from the Vine for bearing no fruit (Jn. 15:2,6);

(www.evangelicaloutreach.org\hell.htm,
Hell And Who Goes There, Chapter 23 of the book, The Believer's Conditional
Security, by Dan Corner)

But what does the Bible says really? Our experience have
demonstrated us Dan have misused each and every one of the things! And he has
erased the footprints of the truth each time! Here are the verse and the things
Dan has hidden from us:

John 15:2

Every branch in me that
beareth not fruit he taketh away{those remaining unbelievers in
Christ, they have no fruit}: and every
branch that beareth fruit{those becoming true
believers in Christ, they have fruit},he purgeth it, that it may bring forth
more fruit{it is not mentioned the ones bearing
fruit may be taken away in the future, it is said that they will be purged so
they can bring forth more fruit. The possibility for the true believer is not
the perdition but to have more fruit. That was the word of the Lord and is
diametrically opposed to Dan Corner’s teaching}.

Again, Dan and the Bible are opposed one to another; again
Dan is hiding from us important parts and conclusions from the same verses he
misuses. Have you noted it? There are only two groups, those bearing some
fruit,
and those bearing not fruit at all. And here is the
marvelous thing Dan has passed unnoticed for us, those bearing fruit have
security of salvation, and those not bearing fruit are not saved. The Lord
doesn’t mention possibility of condemnation for those bearing fruit, but only
to have more fruit by the work of the Lord in them: “every branch that beareth fruit,he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit”. And those condemned
are ONLY those bearing not fruit at all. That means the men
bearing some fruit of true faith have their future secured, because they are not
those condemned. And this is coincident, obviously because the Bible never
contradict itself, with the following teaching of Paul assuring fruit and also
final salvation for the true believer:

Romans 6:22

But now being made free
from sin {aorist tense, a closed and terminated
past act}, and become servants to God{aorist
tense, a closed and terminated past act}, ye have{present tense, indicative mood, present and uninterrupted
possession}your fruit unto holiness, and the end{final
salvation}everlasting life {The
complete expression is literally, according the Greek: “ye have the fruit of
you unto holiness and [ye have] the end [which is] everlasting life”} {We
have here two closed and terminated past acts, being made free from sin and
become servants to God, and the results of those past completed acts are
therefore not dependent nor conditioned on another future thing; because those
are said only to depend on those past completed acts; those results from those
past acts are the fruit unto holiness and the end, which is everlasting life,
being the latter the FINAL SALVATION. Then, we have here that the FINAL
SALVATION IS ONLY DEPENDENT ON TWO PAST ACTS OF INITIAL SALVATION, NOT UPON
FUTURE CONDITIONS THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THE BELIEVER.}.

Another of the many passages twisted by Arminians is Romans 11:19-23, as if to be a broken branch is to be a
believer that lost his faith and salvation:

Romans 11:19-23

19Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken
off, that I might be graffed in.

20Well; because of unbelief they were broken
off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:

21For if God spared not the natural branches,
take heed lest he also spare not thee.

22Behold therefore the goodness and severity
of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou
continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.

23And they also, if they abide not still in
unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again.

But there are an easy and simple answer to the
misusing of this passage: to be a broken branch is not to be a
believer that lost his faith and salvation,
to be a broken branch is to be an unbeliever that never was a believer and never was
saved; because the broken branch are the Jews which were
unbelievers to the Lord. To be a branch
represent only opportunity of salvation for nations in general, and is not
representing the saved believers. That cannot be so easy and clear.

35 Peter said unto him,
Though I should die with thee, yet will I not deny thee. Likewise also said all
the disciples.

Luke 22: 31-32

31 And the Lord said,
Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:

32 But I have prayed for
thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.

Yea, a true believer with an un-perishable faith may be
offended and sifted temporarily, but as his faith is un-perishable, the Lord
sustains it un-perishable, the faith doesn’t fail never; "But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not" is a statement saying that the Lord is responsible
that the true faith doesn’t fail never (the Greek word for "fail" is
a verb in present tense). If you are a true believer in the Lord, but you err
and fail, even so your un-perishable faith doesn’t fail, IS UN-PERISHABLE
ACCORDING TO 1 PETER 1:7!!!

The Matthew 24:10
case:

Matthew 24:10

And then shall many be
offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.

Judas was a traitor, and he was not a believer as it was
showed. Many shall be offended and many shall hate one another, but where it is
said that true believers lose his salvation? It is a Dan's game called ADDING
TO THE WORD.

The 2 Thessalonians
2:3 case:

2 Thessalonians 2:3

Let no man deceive you by
any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away {Greek:
apostasy}first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of
perdition;

Dear pretribulationist brothers, let no man deceive you by any
means: the day of the Lord shall not come, except there come a falling away
first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; but where it is
said here that true believers lose his salvation?

NOTE: The
same Greek word translated abandon (NIV) or depart (KJV) in 1
Tim. 4:1 is also found in Luke 8:13, which also describes what Jesus said
happens to a true believer who stops believing and consequently falls
away.

(www.evangelicaloutreach.org\1timothy.htm,

Now we shall see the truth:

1 Timothy 4:1

Now the Spirit speaketh
expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart {apostatize} from the
faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils

I shall make here that simple question AGAIN, are these guys
of 1 Timothy 4:1 presented as possessing an un-perishable faith as 1 Peter 1:7
says of true believers? Again Dan is making unbelievers to pose as believers!
Remember, you may believe the Gospel as the truth, but your faith may be a not
saving faith, but a superficial and un-rooted feeling. Make you very profoundly
rooted in the word so you may be truly ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED.

Moreover, I know there is a majority of Catholics priest
forbidding to marryand I am sure they
are not true believers having lost his salvation. THEY ARE UNSAVED PEOPLE!

1 Timothy 4:1

1 Now the Spirit speaketh
expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving
heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;

2 Speaking lies in
hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot
iron;

3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats,
which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe
and know the truth.

It is the same for 1
Tim. 1:19,20, quoted by Dan Corner in another place:

1 Timothy 1.18-20

18This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy,
according to the prophecies which went before on thee, that thou by them
mightest war a good warfare;

19Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning
faith have made shipwreck:

20Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I
have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme.

Paul had a power to miraculously chastise unbelievers for
the sake of the gospel (see Acts 13:11) and even for the future conversion of
the unbeliever (see 1 Corinthians 5:5); the Corinthian case resulted in the
repentance of the chastised.

An unbeliever putting away a good conscience may so make
shipwreck concerning faith (the Greek say “concerning faith have made shipwreck” and not “shipwrecked their
faith”). There is nothing solid to sustain a true believer may to lost his
faith. There are nothing recommendable in contradicting clear Scripture such as
1 Peter 1:7 teaching that the faith of the true believer is un-perishable, but
Dan attempt to do it by saying:

A second passage to note is the following one:

Timothy,
my son, I give you this instruction in keeping with the prophecies once made
about you, so that by following them you may fight the good fight, holding
on to faith and a good conscience. Some have rejected these and so have
shipwrecked their faith. Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I
have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme. (1 Tim 1:18-20)

Paul again
mentions faith and a good conscience. He told Timothy that it was
his own personal responsibility to hold on to these for his own
salvation’s sake—so his saving faith wouldn’t become shipwrecked. (God
wasn’t going to hold on to these for him.) Paul added because Hymenaeus
and Alexander didn’t do this very thing, their faith did become shipwrecked and
they were now blaspheming!

Dan failed to note (or he doesn’t want to note) someone may
not to have “faith, and good conscience”, and
even so to reject or put away them. Moreover, the Dan Corner’s translation
“shipwrecked their faith” is a false translation because “their” is not in the
Greek Textus Receptus; moreover the Greek say “concerning
faith have made shipwreck” and not “shipwrecked their faith”. As for Timothy,
he is presented as having faith and good conscience, and the comparison with
the unbelievers men is obviously to encourage Timothy and not to insinuate he
may lose his faith, which is contrary to Scripture (1 Peter 1:7).

The 2 Timothy 4:3-4
case:

2 Timothy 4:3-4

3For the time will come when they will not
endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves
teachers, having itching ears;

4And they shall turn away their ears from the
truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

Yes, "they will not endure
sound doctrine", but where is said that "they" are true believers having lost their
salvation? No a bit!

Take heed unto thyself,
and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save
thyself, and them that hear thee.

The salvation include a past,
present, and future aspect; the past aspect (initial salvation) means a
believer has been saved from the eternal consequences of sin, that is to say
that he has been saved definitively from eternal damnation; the present aspect
(present salvation) means the believer is being saved from the power of sin in
his earthly existence; and the future aspect (final salvation) means the
believer, in his future glorification at the day of the Lord, will be saved
from the dead by the redemption of his body, and his soul and spirit will be
saved in that day in the sense they will enter the glory in the glorified body
and never will go to the lake of fire; not in the sense the soul and the spirit
are hoping a final salvation from hell, because the spirits and souls of the
believers which are asleep are in the presence of the Lord and not in hell,
then they are saved even before the day of the Lord; but because their eternal
salvation is complemented with the redemption of the body it is said they will
be saved in a future tense. Until now we only had been speaking about initial
and final salvation; and we have discovered the falsity of Dan Corner doctrine,
which says that the final salvation is not secured by the initial salvation; we
have seen the Lord and the Apostles teaching that final salvation is secured by
the initial salvation and not by conditions during the life of the believers;
that is to say, that final salvation is secured by initial salvation and not by
the present salvation:

Initial Salvation, according to Colossians
1:12-13, simply refers to entering into the kingdom of God, which occurs really
in a past time of the life of the true believer, the first time he has
believed; thus the language of the Apostle speaks as if we the true believers
are now into the kingdom, thus
assuring us with his strong language we shall enter the final phase of the
kingdom at last. That is the same as presented by the Lord in Mathew 7: 13, 14,
initial salvation is to find the strait gate, and it is presented by the Lord
as necessary and sufficient to attain final salvation. And by Romans 6:22 we
have the final salvation is secured by two closed and terminated initial
salvation past acts, being made free from sin and become servants to God; again
initial salvation securing final salvation.

Until now we only had been
speaking about initial and final salvation, now is the opportune time to speak
about the present salvation, because that salvation is also implied at 1 Timothy 4:16. Timothy
was saved (initial salvation), but “in doing this”
(Greek: present tense, participle) he will save himself; we have here for
Timothy the present salvation aspect by which Timothy was being saved
from the power of sin in his earthly existence. As for the Timothy’s hearers,
initial salvation is implied for the unbelievers hearers, and present salvation
for the believers hearers.

The Word of God teaches clearly
not only that our final salvation is secured by initial salvation, but also
that our definitive salvation doesn’t depend on present salvation:

Ephesians 2:8-10

8 For by grace are yesavedthrough faith; and that not of yourselves: it
is the gift of God:

9 Not of works, lest any
man should boast.

10 For we are his
workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before
ordained that we should walk in them.

The word “saved” is in the Greek not a
simple past participle as in English; in the Greek that is a Perfect Tense
Participle; and that signifies the saved is now definitively saved by a past
completed act of salvation (eternally decisive initial salvation), and at the
present (present salvation) the saved is receiving salvation not as an
unconcluded process, but as the result of a definitive and
completely concluded decisive past act (eternally decisive initial salvation).
According to Dan Corner, the believer is now receiving salvation as a part of
the process of salvation still not concluded (and even a process that may not
be concluded at last!); but that is contradictory with the Perfect Tense
Participle of Ephesians 2:8. We believe, according to Ephesians 2:8, that we
the true believers are receiving salvation constantly (present salvation), and
at last we shall be saved from the death; but we believe we are receiving it
not because our process of salvation is unconcluded, but, as the Perfect Tense
implies, because the results of a past act of definitive salvation are now
being poured upon us the saved.

Another good passage for present salvation is 2
Timothy 4:18, where Paul the Apostle rejoice in his present salvation and his
final destiny in the heavenly kingdom:

2 Timothy 4:18

And the Lord shall deliver me{Greek: “shall save me”}from every evil work, and will preserve me unto his heavenly
kingdom: to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Our present salvation is for the well being and prosperity
of our soul till the secured final salvation, each believer obtains different
degrees of present salvation, but that is obtained:

1 Thessalonians
5:23

And the very God of peace
sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be
preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

1 Peter 2:11

Dearly beloved, I beseech
you as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against
the soul

3 John 1:2

Beloved, I wish above all
things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.

1 Peter 4:17-18

17For the time is come that judgment must
begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be
of them that obey not the gospel of God?

18And if the righteous scarcely be saved {Literally from the Greek: “is saved”, present tense and
indicative mode, that is to say the righteous is saved anyway}, where shall
the ungodly and the sinner appear?

We have also 1 Peter 3:21, where we can see the
important role of the baptism in our present salvation (our eternally decisive
initial salvation was received independently of the baptism, Acts 10:47):

1 Peter 3:21

The like figure whereunto
even baptism doth also now save us (not the
putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience
toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ

In the continuous reception of our present salvation we can
draw resources of motivation from our present or from our secured future
possession of eternal life for our present life:

1 Timothy 6:12

Fight the good fight of
faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto
thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many
witnesses.

1 Timothy 6:19

Laying up in store for
themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life.

One of the best passages on present salvation is 1 Peter
1:1-9, and it is full of the eternal security of the believer as you can see
for yourself:

1 Peter 1:1-9

1Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the
strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,

2Elect according to the foreknowledge of God
the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling
of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied {The recipient of the following words speaking of un-perishable
faith (1 Peter 1:7) are the elects, so it is fatuous to say that an elect can
lose his faith}.

3Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord
Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again {The recipient of the following words speaking of un-perishable
faith (1 Peter 1:7) are the born again, so it is fatuous to say that a born
again can lose his faith}unto a
lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,

4To an inheritance incorruptible, and
undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,

5Who are kept by the power of God through
faith {Present Salvation, which kept us for the
glory, the glory is assured (1 Peter 1:7), but the state of spiritual well
being while here at earth is important, because of our well itself and because
of the rewards in the glory of the last day}unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time {Final Salvation, presented here emphatically as redemption of our
body only, because the souls (of the alive or of the believers which are
asleep) are yet not in the last day. So, by Peter, final salvation is presented
as redemption of our body at the last day, not as the salvation of the soul at
the day of the death, as it is the Dan Corner’s custom to present}.

6Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a
season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations {the hard conditions which now make necessary our present
salvation}:

7That the trial of your faith, being much
more precious than of gold that perisheth {despite
the hardness of the trial, the faith is un-perishable and at last will triumph,
the final triumph of the faith is secured}, though it be tried with
fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus
Christ {the time of the secured triumph of the
un-perishable faith of the born again}:

8Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom,
though now ye see him not, yet believing, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and
full of glory:

9Receiving {Present
Tense, indicating we are receiving now constantly and continuously salvation of
soul, this is the present salvation of the believer, which is now received as a
consequence of the definitive and concluded initial salvation of the eternal
damnation. Many have confounded this instance of salvation at 1 Peter 1:9 with
the final salvation, but that is contradictory with the Present Tense for
“receiving”} the end of your faith {the
present salvation is received according the measure and exercising of the
present faith, but always salvation is received}, even {“even” is not in the Greek text}the salvation
of your souls.

The 2 Peter 3:9 case:

2 Peter 3:9

The Lord is not slack
concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to
us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to
repentance.

He is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any
should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But where it says that
those reaching true faith and repentance may lose their salvation? No an
insignificant bit!

The
2 Timothy 2:12, Revelation 2:7and
Revelation 3:5case:

This verse is misused to teach that if a believer
denies Jesus, Jesus will deny the believer:

2 Timothy 2:12

If we suffer, we shall
also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us

But the context clearly proves that to deny Him
is here used as a synonymous of to remain an unbeliever to Jesus; that is to
say that the believers have confessed Him, the unbeliever till the end have
denied Him:

2 Timothy 2:11-13

11It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead
with him, we shall also live with him:

12If we suffer, we shall also reign with him:
if we deny him, he also will deny us:

The word used for “believe not” is the same
used for the Jews who did not believe in Jesus:

Romans 3:3

For what if somedid not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God
without effect?

Moreover, Revelation 3:5 says the same thing,
Jesus will confess all the believer’s name before His Father:

Revelation 3:5

He
that overcometh {all the believers}, the same
shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the
book of life, but I will confess his name
before my Father, and before his angels.

Those that overcometh are all the believers, are
those being now the sons of God and then
true believers:

1 John 5:4

For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world: and this is
the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith.

Again we have the same thing previously showed by the Lord
by his narrow way analogy and by another things previously showed, that the
final salvation is secured by initial salvation, here the final overcoming is
secured by the initial overcoming of having become sons of God.

So, to be one that overcome is not a condition to fulfill in
the future; but it is a thing that is assured for “whatsoever is born of God” (1 John 5:4); so we have
also that if we are children of God then we are those that overcome, not only
heirs.Now a little of Greek, John says
us that the son of God “overcometh the world”,
a Present Tense, indicating continuous overcoming making the believer one that
always overcome (1 John 5:5); and that continuous overcoming doesn’t depend on
a future condition to be fulfilled but upon a definitively reached fact, to be
sons of God; because the “born” of 1 John 5:4 is a
Perfect Tense; then indicating to be son of God is not a continuous process; but a
definitively reached state. Then we have assured the overcoming not by a future
condition to be fulfilled; but by a definitively reached state, to be sons of
God:

1 John 5:4-5

4 Forwhatsoever is born {Perfect Tense, a past
definitively reached state} of God overcometh
{Present Tense, then not only a victory at our initial or final salvation as
Dan Corner will like it, but a continuous victory}the
world: and this is the victory that overcometh{Aorist
Tense, Participle Mood, to emphasize the security of that previous continuous
victory}the world, even our faith.

5Who ishe
that overcometh {Greek: “o nikoon”, exactly alike
Revelation 3:5} the world, but he that believeth
{“the believer” according to the Participle in Present Tense } that Jesus is the Son of God?

Here are verses about final salvation, salvation
of the body, eternal life for the body in the world to come for those that
overcome, who, as it was demonstrated, are ALLthe believers:

Revelation 2:7

He that hath an ear, let
him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in
the midst of the paradise of God.

Revelation 3:5

He
that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will notblot out his name out of the book of life,
but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.

According to Revelation 3:5the believer’s names will not be in
any way
blot out of the book of life (by the use of the Greek “ou me”, double emphatic
negation), it is stated the impossibility of such thing as a
believer’s name may be blot out of the book of life; it is not insinuated the
possibility of it to be blot out, but it is emphatically negated such
possibility (The Arminians like distracting themselves from the Indicative Mode
and the double emphatic negation, and misuse this verse as if it insinuates a
believer’s name may be erased from that book).

This is, for now, about verses Dan and other people have
misused for their false doctrine. Other misused passages will be treated all
along this document, not only in this part of the same. As for the apostasy, we
have seen it is an unbeliever sin. Let us remember, so as a true believer can
fail (Peter at the negation episode) without losing his salvation, so an
unbeliever can "un-fail" (the men of 2 Peter 2:15) without getting
saved. Those men, Peter says us, "have escaped
the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus
Christ", and even more, they "have
known the way of righteousness" and they have received "the holy commandment delivered unto them". But
those men NEVER GOT SAVED, Peter calls them dogs and sows returning to their
proper filthiness.It is important to
explain how people apparently Christian become apostate. The apostasy is a
phenomenon proper of unbelievers; it is not proper of believers. Remember, true
believers have experienced the initial salvation, which assures them final
salvation. And that the true believers are never to be apostates became evident
also because his faith is un-perishable (1 Peter 1:7). So the apostasy is a
phenomenon of unbelievers returning to their old lives after having experienced
temporarily the benign influence of the gospel and the Holy Ghost, but having
experienced neither true faith nor initial salvation nor regeneration, apostasy
is not proper of believers. Arminians, you do err not knowing the Scriptures
nor the power of God! Be compassionate with yourselves and believe the true
gospel.