Description

Oakley designed the Radar Pitch Polarized sunglasses to meet the uncompromising demands of their professional athletes. The Pitch shades offer a medium size lens in the Radar line to offer you comfort and visual clarity when you're paddling class IV rapids. The Radar Pitch Sunglasses offer a permanent hydrophobic lens coating that repels water, dust, and smudges when your single track loop take you into less-than-favorable conditions. The more you perspire on that grueling trail run, the Radar's Unobtanium earpieces and nose piece maintain a comfortable, balanced hold on your face.

I'm looking to see if I can get replacement...

Sill looking for a replacement? Go directly to Oakley.com; talk to or chat with a Oakley rep. to find out for sure it replacement lenses are still available (you can almost always buy replacement/additional lenses from them.

Have an answer for sherry Cooper?

Too tight!

I also found the glasses to be a bit tight. After a few hours of wearing them, I have to take them off because they start hurting the sides of my head. Is there any way to adjust them so they are a bit wider?

Comment on Lew3378910's review:

Review Title

The Oakley Radar Pitch Sunglasses are just great for outdoor activities, sport etc.. They fit nicely and comfortably on your face and the nose piece is great!! You have to take care with the lenses cause the scratch too easily!!

Comment on Mar Oec's review:

Radar pitch

The Oakley Pitch sunglasses are the top of the line. I have the Oakley wires also but they just don't cut it for golf, fishing, biking, and baseball. The Rader's are perfect and the best for anyone that will be active when they need sunglasses. They are much better then the M frames. The radar's are the upgraded version of the M frames. They are tighter on the face then the M frames but that's good cause the M frames would fall off your face when diving for a fly ball or mountain biking. There is a reason why MLB players wear the raders instead of the M frames. The Rader PITCH are better on the face then the paths. The path len is smaller and don't cut out all of the sunlight. If you have a big face, then mb the ranges are for you. I have a normal face and I like the pitches the best. GET the polarized or you just wasting your money. There expensive but I never go back to not having polarized sunglasses. Try to get them on sale. Mb backcountry will be cool and run a deal on them.

I agree. I have the Radar 'path' lens shape, and while nice, they don't cover quite as much as I would like (with out wearing goggles!) for mtn. biking, and even road cycling. And always...iridium/polarized...the only way to go (except transitions for dawn/dusk).

Have an answer for nnak6?

Issue with Radars in general

I'm coming from the M-Frame world and decided to try the Radars. Well, I wasn't thrilled. The Radar frames are too rigid for me. I like the more relaxed feel of the M-Frames. Since they are rigid, I also found them too tight. I'm a medium build guy, so I think this may just be something one would like or would drive one crazy.