The increased
visibility of the right-wing war on women's reproductive rights is generating
significant increases in funding, according to leaders of organizations such as
EMILY's List and Planned Parenthood. The 27-year-old EMILY's List is dedicated to electing
pro-choice Democratic women to office:

"We are on track
to have one of the best first quarters we've ever had for candidate
fundraising," said EMILY's
List President Stephanie Schriock.

- Advertisement -

It's a very
different landscape than the one Democratic women faced in 2010, when 11 of
them were ousted from the House and several were replaced by tea party-backed
candidates. Democratic women fared better in the Senate, where moderate Sen.
Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas was the only female Democratic incumbent to lose
her reelection bid, but several others had close calls.

The shift is a
surprise.

A spokeswoman said
the organization, with eight months to go, has already raised more than twice
as much as it did in the whole 2010 election cycle. That cycle EMILY's list
brought in $38.5 million, according to Politico, which consistently labels the
group as "pro-abortion."

Planned Parenthood
has also seen a rise in contributions. A spokesperson wouldn't say how much,
but media reports said the organization brought in $650,000 in two days after
it became known that the Susan G. Komen Foundation was cutting off funding for
it. In addition to the increased flow of money, EMILY's List says it has
doubled its mailing list since the 2010 election and has seen a rise in
additions in the past three months. Both Planned Parenthood and NARAL
Pro-Choice America have seen a rise email recruits as well. It's anybody's
guess how much of all that is due to their own efforts as opposed to spin-off
from the email and social media campaigns that independent grassroots groups,
including Daily Kos, have been running in the wake of the Komen decision and
Limbaugh's shoot-from-the-lip misogyny.

Getting more money
and translating it into winning candidacies and then into effective policies
favoring reproductive rights are, obviously, very different things. But the
Republican over-reach seen in the past 15 months--GOP shadow chairman Rush
Limbaugh's "slut" diatribe, the dozens of abortion-restricting laws
passed in state legislatures and the remarks of ultra-reactionary candidates
like Rick Santorum--seem to have struck a nerve that years and years of organizing
against the anti-choice, anti-privacy forces had not effectively achieved. All
of this adds to the possibility that a reversal could finally be under way.