About DevTopics

DevTopics is a high-level and sometimes satirical look at software development and computer technology. DevTopics is written by Tim Toady, the founder of Browserling Inc, a cross-browser testing company. When we occasionally dive into the details, it's usually about C# and .NET programming. (More)

Ron Burk wrote a terrific, funny article “A Brief History of Windows Programming Revolutions” that describes the internal back-and-forth struggle between programming groups at Microsoft in their endless pursuit to eliminate DLL Hell. First there was DDE, then OLE, COM, ActiveX, MFC, ATL, and eventually .NET:

“And that brings us up to date with .NET (pronounced like ‘doughnut’, only different), which is like the Internet, only with more press releases. Let’s be very, very clear about one thing: .NET will eliminate DLL Hell. .NET includes a new programming language called C# (turns out there was a fatal flaw in Active++ Jspresso, so just as well it died). .NET includes a virtual runtime machine that all languages will use (turns out there’s a fatal flaw in relying on Intel CPUs).”

The serious point behind this funny article is how each of these Microsoft “revolutions” were supposed to be the panacea of Windows development, only to be replaced in a few short years by the next-best-thing.

At least Microsoft has stuck with .NET Framework for 8 years, but the churn continues within the .NET development ecosystem. Remember how WindowsForms was supposed to provide a rich client GUI that ran across all hardware platforms? Turns out it didn’t work so well in a web browser, so Microsoft invented WebForms. And MVC. WinForms also didn’t render well on Linux, so open-source geeks use Gtk# instead. And WinForms is too heavy to run on mobile devices, so Microsoft ejected it from the .NET Compact Framework. But .NET CF is too “old school” for smartphones, so now there’s Silverlight. Are you following me?

First it was musicians, now it’s software developers, and next it will be movie stars. The gravy train is over, folks!

If you write code for a living, your career is in the crosshairs of the Web’s demand that everything digital be cheap or free. A whole generation is growing up believing that if you cannot touch it, then it has no monetary value and is free for the taking.

Is this necessarily a bad thing? If we remove the economic incentive for the time-and-resource-intensive business of software development, consumers are likely to see fewer ambitious software products like Photoshop and Microsoft Office. However, I’m confident in the future that we’ll all enjoy an endless supply of Fart apps.