Character analysis of “The Hitch-Hiker” by Roald Dahl Essay

The enlistment hiker’s visual aspect was described as a little ratty faced adult male with gray dentitions. rat like eyes. somewhat pointed ears. have oning a fabric chapeau. gray coloured jacket with tremendous pockets. In other words. he looked like a human rat. In my sentiment I think that Roald Dahl describes the enlistment tramp likewise to a rat so that it makes the reader assume that the enlistment tramp is likely a looney-toon. liquidator or some other kind of condemnable. Once the reader assume that. it will do them foretell that something bad or interesting will go on affecting the storyteller and enlistment tramp.

Hire a custom writer who has experience. It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

The enlistment hiker’s visual aspect as a rat besides predicts his personality. When normal human existences think of ratty type people. their stereotyped reaction will be that the individual is selfish. backstabbing. dirty. smelly. disloyal. violent and likely a felon.

At the beginning of the narrative. the storyteller asks the enlistment tramp why the he was traveling to the Equus caballus races if he wasn’t traveling to wager. the enlistment tramp acts as if he didn’t hear the inquiry and doesn’t seem to wish it. These actions predict that something is up. otherwise why wouldn’t he answer the inquiry.

In the narrative. the enlistment tramp has really fast custodies. He managed to turn over up a coffin nail in merely 5 seconds. He besides managed to knick off the storytellers watch. billfold. shoe lace. driving licence. cardinal pealing with keys. coins. a missive. a diary. and an expensive sapphire and pearl ring. belonging to the storytellers married woman.

The enlistment tramps highly talented custodies make the readers assume that the enlistment hiker’s occupation. that he has been concealing all along. had something to make with his custodies. taking the reader to presume that he was likely a choice pocket. Yet once more Roald Dahl makes the readers assume something and so surprises the reader ; in this instance the enlistment tramp is really a finger Smith. seemingly the top place in the choice pocket calling.

When the enlistment tramp speaks. he has an speech pattern. for illustration he says. ‘guv’nor’ ‘od’carrier’ . This lets the readers know that he is likely non from London. and from the state side.

The most noticeable thing about the enlistment hiker’s address is that he manages to knock everything as if he looks down on every type of occupation out at that place. For illustration when the storyteller guesses the enlistment tramps occupation as a piano participant. the enlistment tramp responds stating. “My occupation. is a 100 times more hard than a piano participant. any twirp can larn how to make that. ” When the storyteller guesses that the enlistment tramp is a card participant. the enlistment tramp responds stating. “Me! A icky card sharp? That’s a suffering racket if of all time there was one. ”The enlistment tramp knocking every occupation makes the reader think that he must be improbably skilled and talented. and that his occupation is the most knowing occupation out at that place. Yet once more. Roald Dahl surprises the readers that the enlistment tramp is in the felon concern even though all the hints add up to it.

The relationship between the storyteller and enlistment tramp is really surprising and unpredictable. It turns out that they become friends in the terminal despite the fact that the enlistment tramp is a condemnable and the storyteller is a successful author. I think that Roald Dahl teaches a small lesson in this narrative that even the two most opposite type people can hold something in common and become friends.