-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Whitley wrote:
> Martin Pool <mbp <at> canonical.com> writes:
>> Since we support Python regexps in ignore rules, it may already be
>> possible to use a negative-match regexp to do this. If there is, it
>> should be documented as as recipe; if not it would be worth filing or
>> duping a bug.
>> I didn't see a dupe, so I filed as:
>https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428031>> Good idea, re: regexps. Depending on the ignore implementation, a
> negative-match regexp may or may not work as the user expects. It
> might require collapsing some or all ignore rules into a big ugly
> alternate-list regexp. If the ignore engine already compiles the
> rules into a big regexp, a negative matcher might be ok.
>> In any event, I plan on starting by hacking out some (failing)
> exclusion tests and will use that time to see if a negative-match
> regexp approach will indeed work.
>> -- John
We turn globs into regexps and then put them all together in one big
match. Except it turned out that python's matcher had a limit of
something like 100 groups, so we limit it to 50 groups at a time.
Unfortunately this probably means that it will work for almost everyone,
except when it starts failing unpredictably...
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkqqkdkACgkQJdeBCYSNAAO++wCfalYyXU6smqPVyAWdDmhTA0Co
YIgAniKsDptfebdj30g5V7jpi1ii04uX
=Pzxn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----