Few academics and policy specialists can see the joke in climate change and that’s a shame, because when societies have big questions to address, some of the best work is done through the ‘cultural work’ of comedy and drama. With reference to my posting of 14th January it was a relief recently to come across Robert Butler’s blog entry on climate change comedy. There has been a healthy offering of lightbulb jokes about climate change deniers in response to his invitation. I think his own (the first) is the best.

Q: How many climate sceptics does it take to change a lightbulb?

A: None. It's too early to say if the lightbulb needs changing.

A: None. It's more cost-effective to live in the dark.

A: None. We only know how to screw the planet.

A: None. Eventually the lightbulbs will right themselves.

It has been assumed in the science and policy community that the only way to ‘beat the sceptics’ is to shout ever more loudly that the ‘science is finished’ and that the nay-sayers are ‘outside the consensus’. The most shrill voices have drawn on the most extreme comparisons to hand, including holocaust denial, to describe the mixed bag of libertarians and right wing retired politicians and advisers (Lawson; Monckton) and academic entrepreneurs (Lomborg) who dispute the IPCC and UNFCCC account of climate science and policy.

The tendency to paint ‘climate change deniers’ in such dark terms has greatly inflated the value of their stock in the eyes of the media. In this sense the Lomborg franchise (and a very profitable one it is too) is a creation of the environmental NGO and science community’s own making. These contrarians have enjoyed a degree of media attention out of all proportion with the quality of their science or policy arguments, and hence had a much larger impact on the public conversation than their arguments deserve.

It also does a disservice to the vital intellectual tool of scepticism to tag these doggedly contrarian commentators as ‘climate sceptics’. Scepticism should be one of the more prominent virtues of all journalists, researchers and students. Climate science is an unfinished – indeed unfinishable project. The attempt to make sense of how atmosphere, biosphere, geosphere and anthroposphere (us) work together is one of the great intellectual projects of our time, and we are working with best guesses. There will be the odd cold spell; quiet hurricane season, and badly deployed biofuels policy. However none of these need weaken the case for action on climate change if we recognise that we are working to reduce the risk of danger rather than acting on a body of certain, urgent, solid facts.

Copyrighted imageCredit: Climate Cartoons

We all need to get comfortable with the fact that climate science and politics is a work in progress. This means we need to keep asking questions and welcoming well-considered challenges. These should include left-field thinking and yes, the odd gag. And in addition to laughing at the worst excesses of our contrarian friends we might sometimes choose to laugh with them. This simple act would help bring them down to their proper (modest but useful) size.

Comments

A. None, because they don't believe it even needs changing, plus there's stuff on the internet that proves the room actually got lighter when the light bulb blew, and besides, it's all a secret plot by light bulb makers (a.k.a. the Illuminati) to establish a leftist World Government and rob us all of our Personal Beliefs & Freedoms (a.k.a. Dr. Strangelove's Precious Bodily Fluids) Why are you asking that question, anyway?. . .. Who wants to know? . . .. Who are you working for? . . . .

One thing about a leftist government they will not do anything right. That is serious, like a half a deck of cards, or firing three of six cylinders in a combustion engine. The combustion engine which in itself signaled the end of any civilization.

The right wing government seems to do things left as well. Almost hiding there is no more individual. Rather a doomed blob feeding off itself secretly, mindlessly to the end.

Government is not your friend. Not something you trust. It is there as a final last ditch fire line. You only light when it. when the end is inevitable. It is a light and pray kind of action.

You do not go to the government for help. That is like asking the man in the black robe, with the sickle to come over and trim your lawn. When he gets there you are going with him. And more then likely he won't even trim your lawn.

...The combustion engine which in itself signalled the end of any civilization...

er, you mean postbox? surely?

Copyright & revisions

Publication details

Originally published: Wednesday, 14th May 2008

Copyright information

Body text - Copyright: The Open University

Image 'Climate change cartoon' - Copyrighted: Climate Cartoons

Feeds

If you enjoyed this, why not follow a feed to find out when we have new things like it? Choose an RSS feed from the list below. (Don't know what to do with RSS feeds?)
Remember, you can also make your own, personal feed by combining tags from around OpenLearn.

The Open University

The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302). The Open University is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.