Appendix of Selected Previously-Filed Exhibits
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
A
StreetFax Contract
The authentic agreement between Paul Ceglia and Mark Zuckerberg, which says
nothing about Facebook and was found on Ceglia’s own computer. (Doc. No.
241-1).
B
Transcription of the StreetFax Contract
A transcription of the StreetFax Contract. (Doc. No. 331 at 85-86).
C
Ceglia-Kole March 3, 2004 Emails
Images of emails sent by Paul Ceglia to Jim Kole on March 3, 2004, attaching the
StreetFax Contract. (Doc. No. 325 at 83-90).
D
Ceglia-Kole March 4 and 5, 2004 Follow-Up Emails
Email exchange in follow-up to Paul Ceglia’s March 3, 2004 emails to Jim Kole,
confirming the authenticity of the StreetFax Contract. (Doc. No. 331 at 88).
E
Work for Hire Document
The Work for Hire Document attached to the Original and Amended Complaints.
(Doc. Nos. 1-4, 39-1).
F
Work for Hire Document
Scanned images of the version Ceglia produced to Defendants’ experts in July
2011, taken just minutes after its production by Peter V. Tytell. (Doc. No. 330 at
15, 18).
G
Comparison of Conditions of the Work for Hire Document
Side-by-side comparison of the condition of the Work for Hire Document as
captured by Ceglia’s expert on January 13, 2011 and Defendants’ expert on July
14, 2011, extracted from the Report of Peter V. Tytell. (Doc. No. 330 at 7).
H
Selected images Showing Tracery of Page 1 of the Work for Hire Document
Images extracted from the Report of Gus R. Lesnevich that show Ceglia has
proffered multiple traced versions of the Work for Hire Document. (Doc. No. 329).
I
Figures Showing “Tab” Marks from Ceglia’s Attempted Aging of the Work
for Hire Document
Images extracted from Reports of Peter V. Tytell (photographic images) and
Gerald M. LaPorte (images taken with video spectral comparator). (Doc. Nos. 330
at 8-9, 326 at 54-55).
J
The Kasowitz Letter
April 13, 2011 letter from Kasowitz Benson describing Work for Hire Document as
“fabricated” and reminding Ceglia’s then-lawyers DLA Piper and Lippes Mathias
of ethical obligations to report “false statements of material fact” contained in
First Amended Complaint, which they had filed two days earlier. (Doc. No.
589-18).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.