The Nostalgia of Islamic Golden Age vs. the
History of Science

Islamic
Golden Age, usually dated from the middle of the 8th century to the
middle of the 13th century, scholars and engineers (from various
faiths: Muslims, Christian, Jews, Hindus etc.) of the Islamic world contributed
enormously to the arts, literature, philosophy, sciences and technology both by
preserving and building upon earlier traditions and by adding their own
inventions and innovations. Muslim-born philosophers and poets, artists and
scientists, princes and laborers, created a unique culture that has influenced
societies on every continent. Scientific and intellectual achievements blossomed
in the “Golden Age” and passed on to Europe to be expanded upon in the European
Renaissance.

But what was the real dynamic force behind the
making of this “Golden Age”? Was it the scriptural dictums of religion Islam—the
blind-faith on Allah? Or, was it the driving force of rationalism of some
free thinkers? Answer to this above question is the main subject of this long
article.

Islam is the only religion, which pretends to
Claim all the goodies of this planet as their own. They consider Islam is
the best/true religion from Allah (God) and Muslims are the best human beings,
and Allah only loves Muslims. Most devout fanatical Muslims in particular, as
well as, a good percentage of gullible Muslims in general, express a special
nostalgia about the so called ‘Islamic golden age’. Muslims today
emphatically blame western civilization in general and American super power in
particular for all of their problems in their own country. They intentionally
and deliberately mention about the past historical glorious day (golden age) of
Islamic Caliphate only to energize Muslims to unite and fight-back western
civilization in order to regain the past glory of Islamic golden age.

This never-ending Islamic nostalgia is so deep rooted in
their minds that it acts like incurable disease, such as cancer. Although, there
are already many Muslims nations like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Taliban ruled
Afghanistan, Sudan etc which are governed/ruled by strict Islamic or
semi-Islamic rules, which could not bring-back their dreaming ‘Islamic Golden
age’—but when asked, they will say, “No, these are not ruled by pure Islam!
”i.e., these are not pure Islamic countries! To their mind, it is only possible,
if they can establish an Islamic Caliphate like Prophet Muhammad and his four
Rightly Guided Caliphs (truly followed the footsteps of Mohammed), Abu Bakr,
Omar, Uthman and Ali who ruled after Mohammed (having strict Quranic
constitution rule by Islamic Shariaat) which will solve their all problems
for ever.

To this end, some western hypocrites like Maurice Bucaille and Prof. Keith
Moore had invigorated the Islamic zealots to dream their “Golden Age” by their
dishonest and unscrupulous discovery (for exchanges of money) of some make-up
and fraudulent/false scientific theories in Quran. This fraudulent discovery of
science in Quran had created an utopia of making Quran the authentic words of
Allah, which myriads of western educated Islamists used it as the biggest ‘bomb
or bait’ of propaganda only to push gullible Muslim society back to the darkness
of 7th century.

Islamists keep bragging about many Muslim-born luminaries
(who brought the so called “Islamic golden age) and enthusiastically color them
as “Islamic scientists” and call their achievements as the “Islamic
science”. According to them, these ancient Muslim-born luminaries were the
product of religion of Islam and those ancient luminaries were devout Muslims
(?) and their success was only because of Islamic teachings. They want to
use this as the clear proof that—Islam is a divine and true religion, indeed.
That is, these hypocritical western-educated Muslims attempt to brain-wash
gullible Muslims and force them to believe that, ‘Islam actually brought
science and modernity to this world’.

For the last 30 some years, I am dealing with science,
but unfortunately, I never found any scientific theory which was discovered out
of any world religion. That is, I did not find Islamic science, Christian
Science or any Hindu science. I have only learned from the history that "No
religion can claim science its property." All my life I have been
hearing that, religion and science do not mix and match all that well. Some may
even say that science and religion do not see eye-to-eye. Again, some person
with an extreme view may also bluntly put before you that science and religion
are the enemy of each other. I have also learned that, if I believe in
science, then it is difficult to believe in religious dogmas. That means these
two things (religion and science) are like oil and water-can not go mix.
In the most religious schools (Madrashas) of Muslim nations, it is prohibited to
study science. Take for example Sir Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution.
Although widely and totally accepted by modern science, the religionists will
have hard time accepting Darwin's conclusions. Therefore, it can be concluded
that western educated Muslims and all the Mullahs throughout the world do not
believe in evolution one hundred percent. So, what makes science and religion a
good match?

"There is only one universal Science; its
problems and modalities are international and there is no such thing as Islamic
Science just as there is no Hindu Science, nor Jewish Science, no Confucian
Science, nor Christian science".

The Muslim-background Nobel laureate Dr. Salam also could
not find any science that belongs to any religion. But interestingly enough, Dr.
Salam also became an Islamic scientist by the wishful dream of some Islamists
around the world. And that of course, after his Nobel award. Before that-he
was a Kafir. World knows well that Pakistan had constitutionally declared
Ahmedias a Kafir. Since Dr. Salam was a son of Ahamedia (Kadiani), he also was
a Kafir for sure. But after he received Nobel award-Dr. Salam became pious
Muslim overnight. What a miracle? Some over zealous Islamists called Dr. Salam's
achievement as "Islamic science". Question is how can the science do possess any
religion? Dr. Salam (a son of Muslim) and Dr. Weinberger (an atheist) jointly
discovered the scientific theory of "unification of weak and electromagnetic
forces". Now should we call it an Islamic science or an atheist
science? What should we call it?

Liberal Freethinking Abbasid Caliphs

The so called ‘Islamic Golden Age’ was all about the success of
some Muslim-born freethinkers during the period of liberal freethinking
Caliphs of Abbasid dynasty. The seventh Abbasid caliph, al-Ma'mun (813-833), was
even a greater patron of education and science than Harun al-Rashid. He took
considerable pains to obtain Greek manuscripts and even sent a mission to the
Byzantine Emperor Leon the Armenian (8l3 to 890) for that purpose. He ordered
the translation of these manuscripts. He organized at Baghdad a sort of
scientific academy called the House of Wisdom (Bayt al-hilkma), which
included a library and an observatory. He encouraged scholars from all kinds
(various religions), and an enormous amount of scientific work was done under
his patronage. This was the most ambitious undertaking of its kind since the
foundation of the Alexandrian Museum (q. v. first half of third century B. C.).

Al-Ma'mun 'Abdallah al-Ma'mun' was born in Baghdad in 786,
and he died near Tarsus in 833. Al-Ma'mun was the seventh and greatest
'Abbasid caliph (813-833). His mother and wife were Persians, which explains
his Persian and 'Alid proclivities. He was an ardent Mu'tazil, tried to
enforce his views by means of violence. He wrote four long letters to explain
the Qur'an was created, and he cruelly punished those who dared
entertain different views (e.g., Ibn Hannibal). He thus combined in a remarkable
way free thought and intolerance. While persecuting those who objected to
Mu'tazilism, Jews and Christians were very welcome at his court.

Famous luminaries of Islamic golden age

Now, we shall examine the life history of some very famous
luminaries of the Islamic “Golden Age” to evaluate historical truth whether
these Muslim-born freethinkers were true believers of Islam or any other
religion per se. We shall also examine whether the core teachings of religion
Islam had anyway influenced or contributed (as erroneously believed by most
Islamists) to the success of medieval Muslim scientists. Let us find out about
the religious fervor (if there was any) of some of the most famous ancient so
called Islamic scientists and thinkers:

1. Abū Bakr Muhammad ibn Zakarīya
al-Rāzi (865-925):was a Persian physician, philosopher, and scholar. According to
al-Biruni he was born in Rayy, Iran the year 865 AD and died there in 925 AD.
He was perhaps the greatest Muslim-born scientist in the whole of Islamic
world. He was one of the great physicians of all times. Al-Razi
made fundamental and enduring contributions to the fields of Medicine, alchemy,
and philosophy, recorded in over 184 books and articles in various fields of
science. He was well-versed in Greek and Indian Medical knowledge and added
substantially to them from his own observations. He is the author of the
monumental encyclopedia al Hawi, on which he worked for fifteen years. Now, let
us read what al-Razi thought about religions in general.

On Religion: Al-Razi wrote three
books dealing with religion: (1) The Prophet's Fraudulent Tricks, (2)
The Stratagems of Those Who Claim to Be Prophets (Arabic حيل المتنبيين), and
(3) On the Refutation of Revealed Religions (Arabic مخارق الانبياء). He
offered harsh criticism concerning religions, in particular those religions that
claim to have been revealed by prophetic experiences.

About Prophets al-Razi wrote: “The prophets—these
billy goats with long beard, (as Ar Razi disdainfully describes them)—cannot
claim any intellectual or spiritual superiority. These billy goats pretend to
come with a message from God, all the while exhausting themselves in spouting
their lies, and imposing on the masses blind obedience to the "words of the
master." The miracles of the prophets are impostures, based on trickery, or
the stories regarding them are lies. The falseness of what all the prophets say
is evident in the fact that they contradict one another: one affirms what the
other denies, and yet each claims to be the sole depository of the truth; thus
the New Testament contradicts the Torah,the Koran the New Testament.
As for the Koran, it is but an assorted mixture of ‘absurd and inconsistent
fables,’ which has ridiculously been judged inimitable, when, in fact, its
language, style, and its much-vaunted ‘eloquence’ are far from being
faultless.” According to Albert Hourani, “he laid emphasis on reason as the
sole guide, and dismissed revelation a false and religion a dangerous.”

About God’s messenger, al-Razi
continued, “On what ground do you deem it necessary
that God should single out certain individuals [by giving them prophecy], that
he should set them up above other people, that he should appoint them to be the
people’s guides, and make people dependent upon them?” Al-Razi argued that, “it
would be illogical for God to reveal himself only to a selected few. God
should not set some individuals over others, and there should be between them
neither rivalry nor disagreement which would bring them to perdition.”
Concerning the link between violence and religion, Al-Razi expressed that “God
must have known, considering the many disagreements between different religions,
that "there would be a universal disaster and they would perish in the mutual
hostilities and fighting. Indeed, many people have perished in this way, as we
can see.”

He was also critical of the lack of
interest among religious adherents in the rational and analysis of their
beliefs, and the violent reaction which takes its place:“If the people of
this religion are asked about the proof for the soundness of their religion,
they flare up, get angry and spill the blood of whoever confronts them with this
question. They forbid rational speculation, strive to kill their adversaries.
This is why truth became thoroughly silenced and concealed. Al-name
of so-and-so..”

Razi believed that common people had originally been duped into
belief by religious authority figures and by the
status quo. He believed that these authority figures were able to
continually deceive the common people "as a result of [religious people] being
long accustomed to their religious denomination, as days passed and it became a
habit. Because they were deluded by the beards of the goats, who sit in ranks in
their councils, straining their throats in recounting lies, senseless myths and
"so-and-so told us in the name of so-and-so..”

He believed that the existence of a large variety of religions
was, in itself, evidence that they were all man made, saying, "Jesus
claimed that he is the son of God, while Moses claimed that He (God) had no son,
and Muhammad claimed that he [Jesus] was created like the rest of humanity." and
"Mani
and
Zoroaster contradicted Moses, Jesus and Muhammad regarding the Eternal One,
the coming into being of the world, and the reasons for the [existence] of good
and evil." In relation to the Hebrew's God asking of sacrifices, he said that
"This sounds like the words of the needy rather than of the Laudable
Self-sufficient one.”

Asked if a philosopher can follow a
prophetically revealed religion, al-Razi frankly replies:

How can anyone
think philosophically while listening to old wives' tales founded on
contradictions, which obdurate ignorance, and dogmatism? Gentility of character,
friendliness and purity of mind, are found in those who are capable of thinking
profoundly on abstruse matters and scientific minutiae.

About Quran, al-Razi said: “You
claim that the evidentiary miracle is present and available, namely, the Koran.
You say: "Whoever denies it, let him produce a similar one." Indeed, we shall
produce a thousand similar, from the works of rhetoricians, eloquent speakers
and valiant poets, which are more appropriately phrased and state the issues
more succinctly. They convey the meaning better and their rhymed prose is in
better meter. ... By God what you say astonishes us! You are talking about a
work which recounts ancient myths, and which at the same time is full of
contradictions and does not contain any useful information or explanation. Then
they say: “Produce something like it”? [Wikipedia]

Custom, tradition, and intellectual laziness lead men to follow their
religious leaders blindly. Religions have been the sole cause of the bloody wars
that have ravaged mankind. Religions have also been resolutely hostile to
philosophical speculation and to scientific research. The so-called holy
scriptures are worthless and have done more harm than good, whereas the writings
of the ancients like Plato, Aristotle, Euclid, and Hippocrates have rendered
much greater service to humanity.”

About religious devotees al-Razi wrote: “The people who gather round
the religious leaders are either feeble-minded, or they are women and
adolescents. Religion stifles truth and fosters enmity. If a book in itself
constitutes a demonstration that it is true revelation, the treatises of
geometry, astronomy, medicine and logic can justify such a claim much better
than the Quran”.

His views on religion in general and Islam in particular earned him public
condemnation for blasphemy. Al-Razi’s hostility towards the Islamic creed even
angered some of the prominent thinkers of the Islamic world with liberal
leaning, including Alberuni. Only bits and pieces of his refutation of revealed
religion are left in a refutation of his book by an Ismaili author. From this,
it is clear that the greatest mind of the Islamic golden age was not sympathetic
towards Islam at all. Almost all of Ar Razi’s philosophical books were destroyed
by the revival force of back to Islamic darkness.

2. Avicena or Ibn Sina (973-1037): The Uzbek born
great philosopher, physician and scientist Abu Ali Sina, known as Avicenna in
the West. His “major contribution to medical science was his famous book
al-Qanun, known as the "Canon" in the West. The Qanun fi al-Tibb is
an immense encyclopedia of medicine extending over a million words. It surveyed
the entire medical knowledge available from ancient and Muslim sources. Due to
its systematic approach, formal perfection as well as its intrinsic value, the
Qanun superseded Razi's Hawi, Ali Ibn Abbas's Maliki, and
even the works of Galen, and remained supreme for six centuries" (1)
This book was taught as the textbook to the students of Medicine in the
University of Bologna until the 17th Century.

“Avicenna's philosophy was based on a combination of Aristotelianism and
Neoplatonism. Contrary to orthodox Islamic thought, Avicenna denied personal
immortality, God's interest in individuals, and the creation of the world in
time. He was holding philosophy superior to theology. In his commentary on
theology, he dealt with God, creation, and angels etc. and many of his views on
them stood in clear contradiction with their conception in the Islamic theology.
He rejected the central Islamic doctrine of resurrection of the dead in flesh
and blood. Ibn-Sina had also thoroughly rejected religions, including Islam, as
lies. However, as Ibn Sina himself hailed from Khurasan, one cannot dismiss the
possible influences of Buddhism, Zoroastrianism and Hinduism on his philosophy.
Because of his views, Avicenna became the main target of an attack on such
philosophy by the Islamic philosopher al-Ghazali and was even called “apostate.”

3. Al-Ma'arri, (973-1057): the greatest Syrian
philosopher poet, skeptic and freethinker known as Lucretius of the East,
al-Ma’arri was born in Syria and became blind at the age of five. Al-Ma’arri
despised religions in general and Islam in particular. In condemnation of
religions in general, he wrote his poetic verses:

“Religion are noxious weeds and fable invented by the
ancients, worthless except for those who exploit the credulous masses.”

“Hanifs ( Muslims) are stumbling, Christians all
astray
Jews wildered, Magians far on error's way.
We mortals are composed of two great schools
Enlightened knaves or else religious fools.”

Ma’arri’s contempt of all religions and their prophets were
expressed as:

"Do not suppose the
statements of the prophets to be true. Men lived comfortably till they came and
spoiled life. The "sacred books" are only such a set of idle tales as any age
could have and indeed did actually produce."

“ The Prophets, too,
among us come to teach,
Are one with those who from the pulpit preach;
They pray, and slay, and pass away, and yet
Our ills are as the pebbles on the beach.

Mohammed or
Messiah! Hear thou me,
The truth entire nor here nor there can be;
How should our God who made the sun and the moon
Give all his light to One, I cannot see.”

Al-Ma’arri further states that the so-called sacred rites and creed are
deceptive invention of dishonest and greedy men:

Oh fools, awake! The rites a sacred hold

Are but a cheat contrived by men of old

Who lusted after wealth and gained their lust

And died in baseness – and their law is dust.

Al-Ma’arri calls the sacred books out and out fiction and
forgery and regards “reason” as the only means of uncovering the truth:

They recite their sacred books, although the fact informs me

that these are a fiction from first to last.

O reason, Thou (alone) speakest the truth

Then perish the fools who forged the religious traditions or interpreted them!

4. Omar Khayyam (1048-1122):

He was one of the greatest mathematicians, astronomers,
and poets of Iran whose Ruba’iyat (quatrains) are translated into most of the
languages of the world and who has earned a universal recognition by everyone.
Omar Khayyam was an epicurean philosopher, a rationalist skeptic and freethinker
and follower of Greek philosophy, and scornful of religion and in particular of
Islam. His views on Islam were in sheer contradiction with its fundamental
precepts. He objected to the notion that every particular event and phenomenon
was the result of the intervention of Allah. He did not believe in resurrection,
Judgment Day or rewards and punishments in an alleged afterlife. Instead he was
a naturalist and maintained all phenomena of observed on earth were guided by
the laws of nature.

The following poem from his famous Rubayyat, will clearly highlight
his mindset about his love of freethinking rational Greek philosophy against
blind-faith theological Islamic doctrines:

"If Madrasahs of those drunks

Became the educational institutes

Of teaching philosophy of

Epicures, Plato and Aristotle;

If Abode and Mazars of Peer and Dervish

Is turned into research institutes,

If men instead of following blind faith of religion

Should have cultivated ethics,

If the abode of worships were turned into

Centers of learning of all academic activities,

If instead of studying religion, men

Would have devoted to develop mathematics - algebra,

If logic of science would have occupied the place of

Sufism, faith and superstition,

Religion that divides human beings

Would have replaced by humanism…

Then world would have turned into haven,

The world on other side then would have extinguished

The world would then become full of

Love-affection-freedom-joy,

And there is no doubt about it."

Edward Fitzgerald sums up the
delightful nature of Omar Khayyam and his philosophy thus:

"...Omar’s
Epicurean Audacity of thought and Speech caused him to be regarded askance in
his own time and country. He is said to have been especially hated and dreaded
by the Sufis, whose practice he ridiculed, and whose faith amounts to little
more than his own, when strips of the Mysticism and formal recognition of
Islamism under which Omar would not hide.”

Khayyam did not believe in any other world except this
one. He was more concerned to enjoy the simple pleasures of life than confused
world of the unknown. He was an agnostic par excellence “preferring rather to
soothe the soul through the senses into acquiescence with things as he saw them,
than to perplex it with vain disquietude after what they might be.”

Here are some examples Omar’s quatrains translated
by Fitzgerald

Some for the Glories of This World; and some
Sigh for the Prophet’s Paradise to come;
Ah, take the Cash, and let the Credit go
Nor heed the rumble of a distant Drum!

Why, all the
Saints and Sages who discuss’d
Of the Two Worlds so learnedly, are thrust
Like foolish Prophets forth; their Words to Scorn
Are scatter’d, and their Mouths are stopt with Dust.

Dreaming
when Dawn’s Left Hand was in the Sky
I heard a Voice within the Tavern cry:
‘Awake, my Little ones, and fill the Cup
Before Life’s Liquor in its Cup be dry.’

5.
Ibn Rushd (1126-1198): This great mind born in Andalusia, Spain and
was an important philosopher and scientist, known in the Western world as
Averroes. His influence on European thought tends to be forgotten by Arabs and
Europeans alike. But in the 13th and 14th century Averroism was as influential
as was Marxism in the 19th century. Ibn Rushd worked as a mediator between the
Arabic and the Western world by commenting and interpreting Greek philosophers
such as Aristotle and Plato, making them accessible to Arabic culture. He
considered Aristotle as ‘the Prefect Man’. He wrote extensive commentaries on
Aristotle and earned the epithet of “The Commentator”. “He expounded the Quran
in Aristotelian terms. In many of his works, he also tried to mediate between
philosophy and religion.

Religious leaders did not always praise his works; he was condemned for
heresy by the Christian, the Jewish and the Islamic orthodoxy and his works were
frequently banished and burnt.” Ibn Rushd fell out of favor with the Caliph due
to the opposition that theologians had raised against his writings. He was
accused of heresy, interrogated and banned to Lucena, close to Cordova. At the
same time, the Caliph ordered the books of the philosopher to be burnt, with
the exception of his works on Medicine, Arithmetic and Elementary Astronomy
(around 1195). Somewhat later the Caliph revoked the banishment and
called Ibn Rushd back to Marrakesh. The works of Ibn Rushd also aroused
admiration in Europe, even among those theologians who saw a danger for
religious faith in his writings. In the 13th century, Ibn Rushd was condemned
by bishops from Paris, Oxford and Canterbury for reasons similar to those that
had caused his condemnation by the orthodox Muslims in Spain.

Abu Yaqub, the Caliph of Morocco, called him to his capital and appointed him
as his physician in place of Ibn Tufail. His son Yaqub al-Mansur retained him
for some time but soon Ibn Rushd's views on theology and philosophy drew the
Caliph's wrath. All his books, barring strictly scientific ones, were burnt
and he was banished to Lucena. However, as a result of intervention of several
leading scholars he was forgiven after about four years and recalled to Morocco
in 1198; but he died towards the end of the same year. Ibn Rushd was a liberal,
an exponent of liberation of women and regarded “much of the poverty and
distress of the times arises from the fact that women are kept like “domestic
animals or house plants for purposes of gratification, of a very questionable
character besides, instead of being allowed to take part in the production of
material and intellectual wealth, and in the preservation of the same.

6. Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi
(780-850): Was born in Khwarizmi (now Khiva) in Uzbekistan. He worked most
of his life as a scholar in the house of wisdom (established by Caliph al-Mamun)
in Baghdad. He was a Persian mathematician, astronomer, astrologer and
geographer. Some of his contributions were based on earlier Persian and
Babylonian Astronomy, Indian numerals, and the Greek sources.

His Algebra was the first book on the systematic solution
of linear and quadratic equations. Consequently he was considered father of
algebra, a title he shares with Diophantus. Latin translations of his
Arithmetic, on the Indian numerals, introduced the decimal positional number
system to the Western world in the 12th century. He revised and
updated Ptolemy’s Geography as well as writing several works on astronomy and
astrology. His contributions not only made a great impact on mathematics, but on
language as well.

Most of the positional base 10 numeral systems in the world
have originated from India which first developed the concept of
positional numerology. The Indian numeral system is commonly referred to the
West as Hindu-Arabic numeral system, since it reached Europe through the
Arabs.

History of Algebra: The Chinese, the Persians, and the
people of India used algebra thousands of years ago. The Babylonians, Egyptians,
and Greeks contributed to the early development of algebra. Al-Khwarizmi a
teacher in the mathematical school in Baghdad, collected and improved the
advances in algebra of previous Hindu and Arab scholars. His works included the
translation of Greek and Sanskrit scientific manuscript.

According to the historian al-Tabari—al-khwarizmi was an
adherent of the old Zoroastrian religion. Others considered him as orthodox
Muslim. Nevertheless, al-Khwarizmi never indicated that he was influenced by
religiosity or he received any scientific theory out of Koran or hadiths.

7. Al-Biruni (973-1048): born in Khwarezm, Khorasan
(now Uzbekistan) Abu Rayhan Biruni, (widely known as Al-Biruni) was a
Persian-born Muslim polymaths. He was a scientist and physicist,
an anthropologist, an astronomer, an astrologer, an encyclopedist, a historian,
a geographer, a geologist, a mathematician, philosopher, teacher, and a
traveller. He was the first Muslim scholar to study about India and the
Brahminical tradition and has been described as the father of Indology.

In Islamic theology, al-Beruni assigned to the
Qur’an a separate and autonomous realm of its own and held that the Qur’an dose
not interferes in the business of science nor does it infringe on the
realm of science.

8. Yaqub ibn Ishaq al-Kindi (c. 801–873):

Al-Kindi was born in Kufa (modern Iraq) a Muslim Arab polymath. He was a
philosopher, scientist, astrologer, astronomer, chemist, mathematician,
musician, physician and physicist who was well known for his utmost interest in
Greek philosophy. He was the first prominent philosopher of the Islamic world
and was a member of the former Christian Arab tribe of Al-Kinda and was the only
pure blooded Arab philosopher. The Italian Renaissance scholar
Geralomo Cardano (1501–1575) considered him one of the twelve greatest minds
of the Middle Ages.

Al-Kindi became a prominent figure in the
House of Wisdom, and a number of
Abbasid Caliphs appointed him to oversee the translation of
Greek scientific and philosophical texts into the
Arabic language. This contact with "the philosophy of the ancients" (as
Greek philosophy was often referred to by Muslim scholars) had a profound effect
on his intellectual development, and lead him to write a number of original
treatises of his own on a range of subjects ranging from metaphysics and ethics
to mathematics and philosophy and pharmacology. In the field of mathematics,
al-Kindi played an important role in introducing
Indian numerals to the Islamic and Christian world.

His own thought was largely influenced by the Neo-Platonic
philosophy of Proclus, Plotinus and John Philoponus, amongst others,
although he does appear to have borrowed ideas from other Hellenistic schools as
well. Earlier experts had suggested that he was influenced by the
Mutazilite school of theology, because of the mutual concern both he and
they demonstrated for maintaining the pure unity (tawhid) of God. However, such
agreements are now considered incidental, as further study has shown that
they disagreed on a number of equally important topics.

During his life, al-Kindi was fortunate enough to enjoy the
patronage of the pro-Mutazilite
Caliphs
al-Ma'mun and
al-Mu'tasim, which meant he could carry out his philosophical speculations
with relative ease. This would change significantly towards the end of his life
when
al-Mutawakkil supported the more orthodox
Asharite school, and initiated persecution of various unorthodox schools
of thought, including the philosophers. He also engaged in disputations with
the
Mutazilites, whom he attacked for their belief in atoms. But the real role
of al-Kindi in the conflict between philosophers and theologians would be to
prepare the ground for debate. His works, says Deborah Black, contained all the
seeds of future controversy that would be fully realized in al-Ghazali's
Incoherence of the Philosophers.

9. Al-Farabi (870-950):

Al-Farabi, the Turkoman thinker, was the greatest scientists and philosophers
of the Islamic world. Among the scholars of the Middle Period - (tenth and
eleventh centuries ad) al-Farabi was considered the foremost Aristotelian,
and was indeed known as the Second Teacher (Aristotle himself being the First
Teacher). He made notable contributions to the fields of mathematics,
philosophy, medicine, sociology and music. He was inspired by the Platonism and
Neo-Platonism and was a great exponent of the Aristotelian school of philosophy.
He wrote rich commentaries on Aristotle and like al-Razi, he considered
reason superior to revelation and advocated for the relegation of prophecy to
philosophy. According to him as quoted by Nicholson, “…reason should
govern and control the life of man. He definitely did not believe in the
inherent doctrines of the Islamic creed and wished it could be reformed guided
by philosophy. He was also a major political scientist and may rightly be
acclaimed as one of the greatest of Islamic philosophers of all time. While his
name tends to be overshadowed by that of Ibn Sina, it is worth bearing in mind
that the latter was less original than the former.

10.
Geber Geber: (721-815):

Geber, aka Abu Musa Jabir ibn Hayyan, was a prominent
Islamic alchemist, pharmacist, philosopher, astronomer, and physicist. He has
also been referred to as "the father of Arab chemistry" by Europeans. His ethnic
background is not clear; although most sources state he was an Arab, some
describe him as Persian. Jabir was born in Tus, Khorasan, in Iran, which was at
the time ruled by the Umayyad Caliphate. He was the son of Hayyan al-Azdi, a
pharmacist of the Arabian Azd tribe who emigrated from Yemen to Kufa (in
present-day Iraq) during the Umayyad Caliphate.

Jabir is mostly known for his contributions to chemistry.
He emphasised systematic experimentation, and did much to free alchemy from
superstition and turn it into a science. He is credited with the invention of
many types of now-basic chemical laboratory equipment, and with the discovery
and description of many now-commonplace chemical substances and processes - such
as the hydrochloric and nitric acids, distillation, and crystallization ­ that
have become the foundation of today's chemistry and chemical engineering.
Jabir's alchemical investigations were theoretically grounded in an elaborate
numerology related to Pythagorean and Neoplatonic systems. In his writings,
Jabir pays tribute to Egyptian and Greek alchemists Hermes Trismegistus,
Agathodaimon, Pythagoras, and Socrates.

His books strongly influenced the medieval European
alchemists and justified their search for the philosopher's stone. In spite of
his leanings toward mysticism (he was considered a Sufi) and superstition, he
more clearly recognised and proclaimed the importance of experimentation. Jabir
became an alchemist at the court of Caliph Harun al-Rashid, for whom he wrote
the Kitab al-Zuhra ("The Book of Venus", on "the noble art of alchemy"). In the
middle Ages, Jabir's treatises on chemistry were translated into Latin and
became standard texts for European alchemists.

11. Abulcasis(936-1013):

Abul Qasim Khalaf ibn al-Abbas al-Zahrawi (known in the west as Abulcasis) was a
Spanish Muslim Philosopher born in 936 A.D. in Zahra in the neighborhood of
Cordova. He became one of the most renowned surgeons of the Muslim era and was
physician to King Al-Hakam-II of Spain. After a long medical career, rich with
significant original contribution, he died in 1013 A.D. He is best known for his
early and original breakthroughs in surgery as well as for his famous Medical
Encyclopedia called Al-Tasrif, which is composed of thirty volumes
covering different aspects of medical science.
He is considered the father of modern surgery and as Islam’s greatest medieval
surgeon whose comprehensive medical texts, combining Arab medicine and
Greco-Roman teachings, shaped both Islamic and European surgical procedures up
until the Renaissance. His greatest contribution to history is the
Kitab al-Tasrif, a thirty-volume encyclopedia of medical practices.
According to Dr. Cambell (History of Arab Medicine), his principles of
medical science surpassed those of Galen
in the European medical curriculum.

12. Abu Hamid al-Ghazali [aka: Algazel] (450-505 AH) or (1058-1111 AD):
was born and died in Tus, in the Khorasan province of Persia (Modern day Iran).
He was one of the greatest Muslim theologians, jurist, philosopher and mystics
of the 12th Century. He wrote on a wide range of topics including jurisprudence,
theology, mysticism and philosophy.

Imam Al-Ghazali is widely known for his heroic role to defeat Mu‘tazilites
(rationalized movement) and revived pure Islam.While it
is well known that Al-Ghazali himself intended to "shut the door of ijtihad"
(the process through which Islamic scholars can generate new rules for Muslims)
completely and permanently, which led the Islamic societies to be "frozen in
time". Works of critics of Al-Ghazali (such as Ibn-Rushd, a rationalist), as
well as the works of any ancient philosopher, were practically forbidden in
these "frozen societies" through the centuries. As a result, all chances were
lost to gradually revitalize religion of Islam. His 11th century book
titled “The Incoherence of the Philosophers” marks a major turn in
Islamic epistemology (study of the nature, methods, limitations, and validity of
knowledge and belief) and marked a turning point in Islamic philosophy in its
vehement rejections of Aristotle and Plato. The book took aimed bitter
attack to the group of Islamic philosophers (from the 8-11 centuries) most
notable Avicenna and Al-Frabi etc. who drew intellectually upon the Ancient
Greeks. Ghazali bitterly denounced Aristotle, Socrates and other Greek
philosophers and writers. And labeled those who adopted their methods and ideas
as corrupters of the true Islamic faith.

Another of Ghazali’s major work was:
Ihya al-Ulum al-Din (The revival of religious sciences) was widely
regarded as the greatest work of Muslim spirituality, and has, for centuries,
been the most read work after the Qur’ān in the Muslim world. In this book
Imam Ghazali rejuvenated Islamic dogmas (full of ridiculous
hadiths with untold superstitions and absurdities) only to push back Muslim
societies deep into the darkness of Islamic radicalism. He mastered
philosophy and then criticized it in order to Islamicize it. Philosophy declined
in the Sunni world after al-Ghazali, and his criticism of philosophers (Islamic
luminaries who followed Aristotle, Pluto, Socrates etc) certainly accelerated
this decline. Nearly a century later, IBN RUSHD (Averroes) made desperate
efforts to resist the trend by refuting al-Ghazali’s Tahafut in his Tahafut
al-tahafut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence) and Fasl al-maqal
(The Decisive Treatise), but he could not stop it.

Discussions:

The above brief life stories of the greatest luminaries
of the so called Islamic civilization or Arab civilization clearly
established/disclosed one bitter truth for those wishful Islamists and that is
all of the medieval luminaries except Imam al-Ghazali were either not so
good Muslims or even an atheist; although, many of them were not courageous
enough to disclose their status of belief for fear of reprisals and persecutions
from the Islamic fanatics. All those ancient Muslim-born (luminaries) were
scientists and scholars by dint of their critical mind and thinking, being
inspired by Greek, Indian and Babylonian civilizations. It was not DUE to
Islam that their talent flourished and shone. There was no Islamic gene; rather
their achievements can be characterized as DESPITE Islam. All these
scientists, physicians were champions of reasons and critical thinking; they
never credited the scripture for their success or for inspiration. It is well
known that talents thrive in an open atmosphere, when no divine restrictions are
imposed on the pursuit of knowledge.

Imam Ghazali
was the only Islamic luminary who was a perfect Muslim or a strong believer in
Islamic theology and because of his strong belief (without reason and logic) in
Islamic theology—Imam Ghazali turned into a famous Islamic theologian,
scholar and a philosopher but he was not a scientists. Because of his
blind belief in Islamic theology Imam Ghazali could not become a scientist. What
could be a better example than this (Ghazali’s case) that without free and
rational thinking nobody can be a scientist, period.

Non-muslim origin of luminaries of Islamic golden age:

When Muslims or Islamists brags about “Islamic Golden Age” they only name
some Muslim-born scientists/philosophers; but they completely forget to name any
non-Muslim luminaries of medieval period. The following are a few to name
amongst the non-muslim scientists and philosophers such as: Albategnius
(al-Battani, 853–929) –who belonged to the star-worshipping Sabian sect of
Northern Mesopotamia, alchemist Stephanus of Alexandria (d. 641 CE), Christian
monk of Syria named Morieus Romanus, Ibn Butlan (d. 1066) and Ibn Tilmid (d.
1065) of Baghdad; Gregorius Barhebreus (d. 1286) (aka Abul Faraj), and Ibn Ali
Isa (d. 1290).

According to the American Thinker, Dr. Jonathan David Carson, "The 'Islamic
scholars' who translated 'ancient Greece's natural philosophy' were a curious
group of Muslims, since all or almost all of the translators from Greek to
Arabic were Christians or Jews."

Besides, all the ancient luminaries like Plato, Aristotle,
Socrates, Buddha, Confucius, Euclid, Epicurus, Democritus, Lucretius and
Aristarchus et al. were born long before Prophet Muhammad and his Islam but they
allhad direct and profound influence in laying the foundation of today’s
world of science, education, politics, human rights and justice.

Science vs. Religion:

Religion had been at odds with science, still is at odds,
and it will remain so until all religions would take demise from this mortal
world. After the renaissance (i.e. during the last 3-4 centuries)-in the
marathon race of dominance, science had won and religion had lost. This is pure
and simple. Now, to compete with science, every religionists searching science
in their own scriptures with a massive magnifying glass. Islam is the champion
in this line. Alas, there could be no science in the scriptures of Islam or in
any religion for sure. I myself first read Qur'an and Hadiths (after I read the
book of M. Bucaille) in search of science, but could not find/match
a single verse/Hadiths with modern-day science. I was dismayed how M.
Bucaillefooled Muslims to earn his millions. He surely fooled the
gullible Muslims while pocketing a large sum of money he received from Saudi
King and also by selling his book (full of fraudulent scientific absurdities)
mostly to Muslims. This does not bode well for Muslims. They have been
portrayed as cretins in the eyes of modern world, which I hate to admit.

Allow me to juxtapose Secularism and democracy vis-a-vis
a blind faith we lovingly call the religion. It is the "SECULARISM AND
DEMOCRACY" which can boost for science and not any RELIGION for sure.
The European Renaissance was born in the yoke of SACULARISM AND DEMOCRACY.
Europe was in the “Dark Age” as long as they were submerged with religious
dogmas under the Roman Catholics. Scores of scientists, freethinkers lost their
lives at the hands of fantasist religionists. Even today, any country that took
the religion as their state constitution is living under the spell of darkness
and they are taking a journey driving their locomotive in the reverse gear.
And this is very true in the field of science. Good examples are Iran, Saudi
Arabia, and all other Muslim countries as well. As long as all the Muslim
countries remain under the clutch of religion Islam, Muslims will never be able
to compete in the field of science with the rest of the world. The less
religious orthodoxy, the more achievement in science. That explains Muslim's
relative advancement around Ninth/Tenth centuries inspired by
Mu‘tazilites (rational thinkers with less orthodoxy) and Christian
Europe's backwardness (closed minds with more orthodoxy).

Science and Civilizations:

Science started its journey right from the day when
ancient cave peoples made their first weapon from the stone.
Necessities and human curiosities were the engine of all sciences.
Science never dropped from the sky for anybody. Science is the continuous
product of human civilizations. Not by one or two, but by all civilizations of
the world such as: Ancient Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Chinese, Indian, Assyrian,
Persian, Greek (Hellenistic), Roman, Islamic Arab, etc, etc. All of this
civilization took part in the "RELAY RACE" of shaping up
ancient science, which was the building block of modern science. Ancient
Egyptians (3000 BC) studied the heavens to forecast seasons, used advanced
geometry to build Pyramids. They also learned human anatomy, physiology,
surgery and medicine, etc. All of the above mentioned ancient pre-Arab
civilizations were very advanced in medicine, astronomy, geometry, mathematics
and other scientific fields much before the arrival of Islamic-Arab
civilization.

Ancient Greeks left the greatest scientific heritage of
all the ancient peoples. Most scientific successes were achieved during the
Hellenistic period who established world's largest ancient library at Alexandria
(Egypt), where half a million books were kept. No one can think about ancient
science without naming Hippocrates, Aristotle, Thales, Pythagoras, Euclid,
Galen, etc., and obviously, those scientists did not learn science from
Islamic Allah or Judeo-Christian’s God. Another very interesting factor is-all
the above mentioned civilizations, somehow or rather, came in contact with each
other (overlapping one by the other) at the Middle Eastern region. Had
there been no ancient Egypt, Mesopotamian, Greek, Roman, Chinese, Indian,
Persian, etc., there could be no science available to Arab to transmit them to
the west. Just as, had there been no Judaism, Paganism, Christianity,
Zoroastrianism and Bahaism was existed in the Middle east-there could be no
Islam or no Qur'an written/produced (copied) by Muhammad. It should
not elude any inquisitive mind that there is an awful lot similarity between the
Old Testament stories and Qur'anic folklore. Even the tenor of Old Testament God
and Islamic Allah seems to be very similar. Coincidence? Huuh!

Let me cite a quotation of George Sarton (History of
Science): "The foundations of science were laid for us by the Mesopotamian
civilizations, whose scholars and scientists were their priests, and to them we
owe foundations of medicine, navigation, astronomy and some mathematics. The
second development came through the Greeks as taught in the traditional way in
Western schools and colleges. The third stage of development
however is to be credited to the dazzling rise of Islam, whose Abbasid caliphs
drank avidly at the foundation of the ancient Persian and Hindu as well as Greek
sources of knowledge. For nearly four hundred years Islam led the world of
science. From Spain to India, the great body of past knowledge
was exchanged between her scholars and the torch carried forward with new
discoveries. Scholars of Christendom from about the eleventh through the
thirteenth century were mainly occupied with translating books from Arabic to
Latin. Thus, Islam paved the way for the renaissance which in turn led to
science's fourth great development in the modern western world".

Now, what have we learned from the above quotation? One
could see in the statement of George Sarton the echo of my thesis. That is
science is the product of continuous RELAY RACE
(development/research) by many different civilizations one after another. In
the history of mankind, civilization always took shape by some popular
slogans/manifesto by different nations. Some came with nationalistic spirits
(such as Egyptian, Persian, Roman, Chinese, Indian, etc.), and some came with
the popular slogans of religion (such as Islamic Arab). In true sense, all of
them were imperialistic forces in some different names and identity, and their
main objective was to conquer new lands to gain wealth (by plundering war booty)
and power. Every civilization when got some tranquility and peaceful times, it
flourished in various (scientific, social, political, etc.) fields.
Islamic-Arab revolution was no exception. The PBS documentary (2005) by Mr.
Robert Gardner, "Islam: Empire of Faith," clearly showed the Arab imperialistic
history. This film failed to show any spirituality or, should I say divinity,
which was purely absent in Islamic utopia. The viewers will have hard time
forgetting that violence ad infinitum, those naked terrorizing bend swords, or
scores of conspiracies to kill the rivals, own sons, own friend. These are of
course not at all signs of so-called peaceful religion. Instead, the viewers
will mostly remember Islam as the NAKED SWORD WAVING MEGALOMANIAC
IMPERILISTIC FORCE getting ready to swallow the entire world. The
present-day Ummatic belief among Jihadist Muslims is remnants of the same
belief.

Fact of the matter is the golden age of Islamic Empire
(Abbasid) happened only because the natural sciences and the so-called Islamic
sciences (read- religious study) were kept separate in the colleges (house of
wisdom in Baghdad) of the day. It seems no coincidence that only when the
religious authorities started to interfere with the natural sciences, starting
in the 11th century (Imam Ghazali’s movement to crush Mu’tazillites), did the
golden age of Islamic civilization lose its glitter.

Comments by the famous Iranian secular historian Dr.
Shoja-e-din Shafa:

Shafa criticized the terminologies such as: "Islamic
civilization", "Islamic science", "Islamic medicine", "Islamic astronomy",
"Islamic scientists", etc. Shafa states that while religion has been a cardinal
foundation for nearly all empires of antiquity to derive their legitimacy from,
it does not possess adequate defining factors to advance a kingdom or domain in
accumulation and furtherance of science, technology, arts, and culture in a way
to justify attribution of such developments to existence and practice of a
certain faith within that realm.”

Shafa particularly points out that: “counting all scholars in
the Islamic empires as Muslims, can also be misleading, since with the harsh
punishment and prosecution awaiting alleged heretics and Zindīq ((refers
to those muslims who’s beliefs have strayed so far from mainstream Islamic
beliefs to have left Islam altogether), no sane scientist or intellectual
would dare express his/her true faith and religious thoughts.” To exemplify this
matter, Shafa alludes to two of the most prominent physicians/philosophers of
the Islamic era, namely Avicenna and Rhazes the former being a true muslim that
was charged with heresy for mere utterance of his philosophical ideas; and the
latter daringly and openly criticizing revealed religions (viz. Islam,
Christianity, Judaism, Zoroastrianism) in three of his controversial treatises,
exposing himself to great peril. Bearing this personality comparison in mind,
factors other than Islamic thought should be considered to have contributed
to the great achievements of such individuals.

What were the sources of Arab/Islamic Science?

Nevertheless, we must give credit to Arab-Islamic
civilization for their role of obtaining, preserving and some improvement of
that available ancient science left by other different civilizations and finally
transmitting them to the West. Islamists very often talking about the modern
scientific debt to Islamic civilization, but they never say anything about the
Arab's scientific debt to those ancient civilizations, and I wonder why they are
so reluctant to give any credits to those who deserve it? Can any Islamist tell
us what the source of Islamic science was? Was it from Qur'an or Hadiths, or
did it come from the heaven through the courtesy of winged archangels?
Certainly not! Arab civilization did not see the light of science
until the middle of 8th century. There was hardly any science
developed during the time of Prophet Muhammad and his 'Caliphate-e-Rashedins'
period. It was the period of liberal Muslim kings of Abbasid dynasty when Arab
civilization finally begun to see the light of science. There is no scope to
give the detail history in this short essay, but it is prudent to note
that-Arabs during the Abbasid kingdoms at Baghdad actually got hold to those
ancient science through their conquests.

They were clever and open minded enough to know that a
kingdom could make awful lot of money by exploiting science. They got hold to
the Greek (Hellenistic) library and begun to translate all those available
scientific books of Latin/Greek into Arabic for a good reason.

The point of this history is to show how the golden age
that Islamists/ fundamentalists refer to was achieved only because Baghdad was
wide open to foreign influences, much as the United States at its birth imported
ideas of the enlightenment from Europe and made more of them than did the Old
World. One can go further. Many of the scholars who translated the manuscripts
of the Greeks, Indians and Chinese, and who flocked to Baghdad in the golden
age, were Christians, Jews and pagans. Although the West as we
know it today didn't exist in the 9th and 10th centuries, one could say that the
Arab world was, for a time, part of the intellectual circle that would become
the West. Many of the Greek classics reached Europe via Muslim Toledo, in Spain,
where they were translated from Arabic into Latin.

These people were not religious priest or Mullahs; they
were intellectuals of that particular civilization. Islamic civilization
actually acted as the conduit between the ancient science and western receiver
who actually better utilized the ancient product. Had there been other
civilization such as Mongols or Chinese dominant at that very period instead of
Arab civilization-same thing could have happened with the transmitting of
science to the West. We must not forget that major breakthrough in
science that world knew about the Arab civilization are the Arab numerals,
Gunpowders, paper, medical knowledge, etc. And it is interesting to note that
among those ancient science-Arab actually got numerals from Indian
mathematicians called "Hindu-Arabic Numerals" Gun powder and papers technology
from Chinese; and Medical knowledge from Indian, Egyptians,
Persians, Mesopotamians, and Chinese.

Brief History how Arabs did get science:

The Paper: It was a Chinese invention of
the first century A.D. and it reached the Middle East via the Battle of Talas
(near Tashkent) in 751, when some Chinese paper makers were captured by the
Arabs. But it was the Arabs who rose paper making to new heights.

The hospital:
was a Persian idea from as early as the sixth century, under the
name "bimaristan." But in Baghdad the institution became much more
sophisticated, with special wards for internal diseases, contagious cases and
psychiatric patients. Field hospitals accompanying Arab armies were also
introduced.

The Mathematics: In the late eighth century, an Indian merchant
brought to Baghdad two seminal mathematical works. One was the Brahmasphuta
Siddhanta, known to Arabs as the Sindhind, the work of the great seventh-century
Indian mathematician Brahmagupta. This contained early ideas about al-jabr, to
give algebra its Arabic name. It was this work that Muhammad ibn-Musa
al-Khwarizmi in the ninth century was to expand on so successfully. Khwarizmi
became known as "the father of algebra" and gave his name to algorithms.

The same Indian merchant also brought a manuscript that introduced for the first
time outside India the nine Hindu numerals we use to this day and are now called
Arabic numerals. (Before that, numbers were written out as words or notated with
letters of the alphabet.) This document also contained the first mention
of the 0,which the Arabscalled zephirum,
from which our words zero and cipher are derived. But again, it was the
Baghdadis who built on these imported innovations, to create what one historian
of mathematics has called "the Arabic hegemony." In addition to Khwarizmi, this
group included Ibn Turk, al-Karkhi, al-Biruni, al-Haytham (called Alhazen in the
West), Nasir Eddin and Omar Khayyam (of the "Rubaiyat" fame).

Finally, Aristotle, as a pagan, he posed a problem for Muslims - as he did for
Christians a couple of centuries later. Nevertheless, the power of his ideas
triumphed, and a whole slew of Arab "falasafahs" were influenced by Aristotle -
Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Ibn Khaldun among them. In addition, al-Farabi glossed
Plato, al-Rhazi (Rhazes) built on Galen and Hippocrates, and Ibn Qurrah added to
Euclid and Archimedes.

Of course, Muslim-born
scientists did some improvement or improvisation to that ancient science. In
modern time, Japanese are known to be a practitioner of that policy. Another
interesting point is most of those renowned Muslim scientists were non-Arab.
Such as: Al-Khwarizmi (Uzbekistan); Al-Razi (Tehran); Al-Ghazzali (Khorman,
Iran); Al-Tabari (Tabristan); Al-Farabi (Turkistan); Al-Biruni (Khwarizm,
Uzbekistan); Ibn Sina (Bukhara, Central Asia); Ibn Rushd (Cordoba, Spain) and so
on. All those scientists/philosophers happened to be sons of Muslim. None of
them were a Mullah or Maolana, and none of them ever claimed that they
got scientific theory by reading Qur'an or gobbling the Hadiths. Then, why do
all those Islamists bring religion in the field of science? Is there any
ulterior motive?

Religion of any type (Christian, Jews, Islam, Hinduism
etc.) can never claim Science as their own property. Similarly, religion should
never claim any credit whatsoever, for the advancement of any science. Galileo
was a great scientist by his knowledge not because he was a son of Christian. In
the same vein, Ibn Sina was a scientist by virtue of his quality and not because
he was a son of Muslim. Einstein was a great scientist because of his intellect
and acuity, not because of his knowledge in Torah. Today, almost 95% of
world's leading scientists are the sons of Christians. Should we then consider
that Christian religion/Bible are the storehouse of all science? Does the
world history support this? Or, should we say that ancient Hindu Kafirs got
science of mathematics (numerals) from Rada krishna?

Islamists frequently
claim that the Koran is full of exhortation to the believers to study nature and
to find the signs of God in the phenomena of nature.ButI did not find any Qur'anic
verse that asked people to study the nature in the scientific point of view,
rather Allah tried to show those nature (Sky, Earth, Sun, Moon, Stars, etc.) as
the evidence that Allah is really very powerful who can create all those
naturally impossible things. Now, do we have to believe that, before the
arrival of Qur'an mankind never saw the sky (heaven), earth, sun, moon and
stars? What Qur'an told about the nature, even cave peoples could have seen
them very well by their own bare eyes. Yes, Qur'an repeatedly talked about
heaven, earth, sun, moon, stars, etc., just to exhibit the strength (threat) and
might of Allah and repeatedly told human being to think about this miracle of
placing sky as the canopy without pillars (which is ridiculous), making stars to
shoot the Satan, placing mountain to make the earth immovable, created thunder
to shoot the sinners, created earthquake to punish the kafirs, revolving poor
sun daily to make day and night, making wide and flat earth, etc. and a whole
slue of other things to reel your head. So, are those Allah's assertions
anyway to be taken as scientific theory? What is the actual point? Should we go
back to fundamentals of Islam and establish true Islamic dogmas (because
according to some apologists only Islam can inspire science) like Afghan
Talibans? Should we banned all western style education systems; should we banned
all secularism, and establish "Kaoumi Madrashas" or "Alia madrashas" to
bring back so called Islamic science? Come on give me break!

Conclusion:

In conclusion,
I can unambiguously summarize the fact that the so called Islamic Golden Age was
not any product of Islamic scriptural knowledge, nor it was due to any degree of
devoutness of religion Islam, rather it was due to short-lived opportunity of
freethinking and rationalism induced by the famous Mu’tazillites and facilitated
by the liberal minded Abbasid Kingdom.

What was the ideology of Mu’tazila which actually
opened the window for rational thinkers? The defining philosophy of Mu’tazila
was freewill, rationalism and scientific thought which was rooted in the
Hellenic-age Greek philosophy. Mu’tazila ideology was greatly promoted during
Abbasid Caliphate (8-13th century) but after that Islamic
re-incarnation by Ahadiths collection by Muslim al –hajjaj, al-Bukhari, Abu
daud, al-Timidi and rise of islamic zealots by the leadership of Imam Ghazali
put the final nail to the coffin of defeated Mu’tazillites—leading to the end of
enlightenment during 13th century and subsequently rise of Islamic
devoutness (darkness of close minds and superstitions) in the Islamic world,
which ended the so called Islamic Golden Age for good.

The Quran emphatically forbade pursuance knowledge and learning that falls
outside the scope of Quran and Sunnah for fear of going astray by emulating path
of error and heresy. Quran directly contradicted the very principle of
Mu’tazilies. Hence, Islamic theological knowledge had very little to contribute
to the attainment of the Golden Age.

When Muslims talk about Islamic Golden Age, they mostly
think of Islamic rule by the Prophet Muhammad and his four Rightly Guided
Caliphs (truly followed the footsteps of Mohammed), Abu Bakr, Omar, Uthman and
Ali who ruled after Mohammed. Their ruling time only lasted about 30 years.
History recorded in the Islamic books only tell us that these Islamic rulers
were busy fighting and killing their rivals, apostates, and non-muslims,
occupying lands and property (war booties), assassinating political rivals, etc.
etc. Polygamy (filling their harem with multiple wives) and child-marriage,
mu’ta marriage (temporary marriage). Alas, nobody can find even a trace of
scientific advances during this 30 year period of Islamic rule. It was the same
scenario with the European “Dark Age” of fundamentalist Christian rule by the
Roman Catholic Papal Empire.

The real contribution of theological force of Islam was the formulation of
“Islamic Sharia laws” derived directly from the Quran and Sunnah
which was solely responsible to keep Muslims in the darkness of
superstitious past which constantly kept them away from the enlightenment of
science. Even after 1400 years, Muslim nations could not free themselves from
the clutch of Islamic Sharia laws which is the cause of Muslims backwardness in
education, science, technology, women rights etc. Forget about any scientific
revolution, even there was no healthy political democracy or economical
development did occur during the period of four Caliphs (khula-faye-Rashedins).
In fact, Islam established an era of Arab imperialistic Kingship, which later
invaded/occupied (by the sword) one fourth of the world in the name of Islam.

It is quite interesting to learn from the true historical account that almost
all freethinkers and rationalists within the Islamic world, such as Ibn Sina,
Al-Razi, Al-Farabi, Al-Ma’arri, Omar Khayyam, Ibn Rusd, Al-Khwarizmi etc were
having little or no faith on orthodox Islamic dictums, nor they were at all
motivated by theological teachings from Islamic books, yet Islam owned them (as
the Islamic product) completely, by the same old Islamic tactics. Surprisingly,
world’s other major religions such as: Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism or
Buddhism never claimed such “false credit” for scientific contributions, because
they all know it well that religion and science can not go hand in hand; rather,
one becomes a dangerous and genuine obstacle to the other.

Now let me put some very prudent questions:

(a) If the Islamists still consider that Arab got
the ancient science from Qur'an or Hadiths, then would it not be normal that
those Islamic Mullahs would discover the science first? (b)
Would it not be normal to expect the revolution of science coming first from all
those Maulanas, Qaari, Imams, Muftis, teachers of all Madrashas, all Madrassah
students, all Talibans-simply because they are the people who are really expert
in Qur'an and Hadiths? (c) If Islamic Arab civilization
derived scientific knowledge from the religion (Qur'an and Hadiths) and they
brought some science to the West, then after that, what made those Muslims
totally burnt-out and become obsolete in the field of science today? (d)
Should it not be a normal phenomenon that, in today's modern scientific race,
Muslims would still lead the rest of the world? (e) Since some
apologists believe religion has no quarrel with science; could we ask all the
Islamic Mullahs to declare Darwin Evolution Theory is
acceptable to Islamic theologians?(f) Could any Islamist
tell us what are the reasons that none of the Muslim nations come even close to
other advanced nations in the field of science?

Caution:

Unfortunately, the rising of Iranian Mullaism, the
religious resurgence by the evil designs of Islamic fanaticisms and gradual
militancy in the Muslim world for the last several decades, rising waves of
Osama bin Laden’s jihadi Islamic terrorisms, have ultimately roused the
religious fervor amongst gullible Muslims. They have not only energized the
dream of reviving false “Islamic Golden Age” among the Muslims in general; this
age-old religious virus also gradually infecting the western Christianity,
especially in America, which poses a great danger of turning the clock of
scientific race backward. Replacement of “Evolution theory” by the grandma’s
folklore story of “Biblical creation theory” in some American public schools,
banning scientific research with human embryos and deceiving bright scopes of
various biological researches by American Government are a few examples of this
dangerous syndrome. The world should not forget those past “shameful episodes”
of Christian mullahs in Europe (in middle age) with the ancient luminaries like:
Copernicus, Brno, Galileo’s, unless mankind, or the world want to lose the
present hard-earned flourishing galloping waves of scientific glitters into the
darkness of religions and superstitions of the past. There is still time left
for mankind sympathetic to science and modernity which are driven by logic and
rationalism, to join us in our fight to break the manacles of repressive age-old
religions. There shouldn't be any room for faith-based systems that would push
us back a good fourteen centuries. The present modern world is driven and
established by the continuous success and glory of science. Unless, we
already forgot that.

18.While gathering pertinent historical information about Islamic
luminaries, I have taken particulars about some of the luminaries’ right from
the articles written on this subject by Drs. Ali Sina and Alamgir, for which I
am indebted to both of them.