A more interesting question concerns what I call "Schroedinger's racist".So imagine a Japanese person in America. Even though this person hates white people and has participated in a lynch mob, he cannot be racist by definition.Now imagine this same person in Japan, where he becomes totally racist by definition.This means that if you put him on a plane from Tokyo to LA, there is a point where he becomes racist and not racist at the same time.Mindblown.jpgAt first I thought that it must be the definition that's wrong, but no, it can't be. Thousands of gender studies scientists can't just be talking out of their ass.

I'm sure I have no idea who you are talking about.I am simply taking the only truly correct definition of the word racist and applying rigorous standards of mansplaining to this definition.It is my hope that this will eventually lead to a whole new field of "quantum social mechanics" so that we can finally tackle the math behind gender fluid dynamics.Edit: I've got the following law already:Ω = ɑ*μΩ -- this is the level of oppression you feel ɑ -- this is social awareness of your feels (1/ɑ -- is then self-awareness) μ -- media constantThis means that the more oppressed you feel, the less self-aware you become, so the math checks out.