Sorry... just found the "Specifications" tab. Assuming standard glass since "HD" is not specified and price point.

Question on future reticles/turrets still stands...

If the 3-9x42 HD came with capped turrets, I would buy them for every hunting rifle I own. They are awesome scopes, built like tanks, crazy reliable, but I would rather not have to scotch tape my turrets for piece of mind while hunting...

I like the reticle choice. It's a 2.5x10 and light as heck, great for hunting. For killing hogs, I wouldn't want all that other in my sight picture. For me, when seconds count, basic duplex is all I want to see.

I like the reticle choice. It's a 2.5x10 and light as heck, great for hunting. For killing hogs, I wouldn't want all that other in my sight picture. For me, when seconds count, basic duplex is all I want to see.

I donít see how a mil quad or mil dot reticle would slow anyone down. Just use the crosshairs like a duplex. Some of the target reticles are a little thin for low light brush but the same can be said for some of the thinner duplexís.

I tend to agree with this. Mil-quad sacrifices nothing over a standard duplex, but adds a lot of value if you do reach out. I'm not as familiar with the reticles that BIL posted, but I'm familiar enough with the mil-quad that I just don't see a negative in adding it over the duplex.

I like the 2.5-10 range and light weight though. Good design and good price if the glass is decent - I'm sure it'll be a good seller.