The Cawthron Institute has worked alongside regional councils to verify the processes and methods used for data collection, laboratory analysis of samples collected and the statistical analysis and interpretation of the results presented.

If all Cawthron ticks are green, then you can trust this data. However, if one or more ticks are orange, then conclusions should be treated with some caution.

All samples were collected using approved field protocols and have been analysed in accredited laboratories. Therefore the data shown here has been collected and analysed following best practice.

State

All samples were collected using approved field protocols and have been analysed in accredited laboratories.

Trend - SAMPLING FREQUENCY

Samples are collected monthly at this site. Proposed national guidelines suggest monthly sampling is required for trend analysis. Therefore, any trends shown here are based on best practice in terms of sampling frequency.

Bacteria

E. coli

{{medianValue('ECOLI')}}

State

{{stateMsg(ECOLI.StateScore)}}

State

{{ECOLI.NofBand | uppercase}}

NOF Band

N/A

NOF Band

Trend

{{trendMsg(ECOLI)}}

Sample history at this site

Showing:

–

E. coli samples for Makotuku at Raetihi

n/100ml

What is this graph showing me?

This graph is displaying E. coli concentrations over the selected time period. You can adjust this period by changing the dropdowns. These records form the basis for the state and trend indicators displayed on the dashboard. This data is raw and has not had any methodology applied to it.

What do the icons mean?

For at least half the time, the estimated risk is <1 in 1000 (0.1% risk). The predicted average infection risk is 1%*.

B

For at least half the time, the estimated risk is <1 in 1000 (0.1% risk). The predicted average infection risk is 2%*.

C

For at least half the time, the estimated risk is <1 in 1000 (0.1% risk). The predicted average infection risk is 3%*.

D

20-30% of the time, the estimated risk is >=50 in 1000 (>5% risk). The predicted average infection risk is >3%*.

E

For more than 30% of the time, the estimated risk is >=50 in 1000 (>5% risk). The predicted average infection risk is >7%*.

* The predicted average infection risk is the overall average infection to swimmers based on a random exposure on a random day,
ignoring any possibility of not swimming during high flows or when a surveillance advisory is in place (assuming that the
E. coli
concentration follows a lognormal distribution). Actual risk will generally be less if a person does not swim during high flows.

Clarity

State

{{stateMsg(BDISC.StateScore)}}

Trend

{{trendMsg(BDISC)}}

Sample history at this site

Showing:

–

Black Disc samples for Makotuku at Raetihi

metres

What is this graph showing me?

This graph is displaying Black Disc readings over the selected time period. You can adjust this period by changing the dropdowns. These records form the basis for the state and trend indicators displayed on the dashboard. This data is raw and has not had any methodology applied to it.

State

{{stateMsg(TURB.StateScore)}}

Trend

{{trendMsg(TURB)}}

Sample history at this site

Showing:

–

Turbidity samples for Makotuku at Raetihi

NTU

What is this graph showing me?

This graph is displaying Turbidity levels over the selected time period. You can adjust this period by changing the dropdowns. These records form the basis for the state and trend indicators displayed on the dashboard. This data is raw and has not had any methodology applied to it.

Nitrogen

State

{{stateMsg(TN.StateScore)}}

Trend

{{trendMsg(TN)}}

Sample history at this site

Showing:

–

Total Nitrogen samples for Makotuku at Raetihi

g/m3

What is this graph showing me?

This graph is displaying Total Nitrogen concentrations over the selected time period. You can adjust this period by changing the dropdowns. These records form the basis for the state and trend indicators displayed on the dashboard. This data is raw and has not had any methodology applied to it.

State

State

{{TON.NofBand | uppercase}}

NOF Band

N/A

NOF Band

Trend

{{trendMsg(TON)}}

Sample history at this site

Showing:

–

Total Oxidised Nitrogen samples for Makotuku at Raetihi

g/m3

What is this graph showing me?

This graph is displaying Total Oxidised Nitrogen concentrations over the selected time period. You can adjust this period by changing the dropdowns. These records form the basis for the state and trend indicators displayed on the dashboard. This data is raw and has not had any methodology applied to it.

Water quality is not considered suitable for the designated use.Impacts on growth of multiple species, and effects starts approaching acute impact level (i.e. risk of death) for sensitive species at higher concentrations (>20 mg/L).

State

State

{{NH4.NofBand | uppercase}}

NOF Band

N/A

NOF Band

Trend

{{trendMsg(NH4)}}

Sample history at this site

Showing:

–

Ammoniacal Nitrogen samples for Makotuku at Raetihi

g/m3

What is this graph showing me?

This graph is displaying Ammoniacal Nitrogen concentrations over the selected time period. You can adjust this period by changing the dropdowns. These records form the basis for the state and trend indicators displayed on the dashboard. This data is raw and has not had any methodology applied to it.

Phosphorus

State

{{stateMsg(DRP.StateScore)}}

Trend

{{trendMsg(DRP)}}

Sample history at this site

Showing:

–

Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus samples for Makotuku at Raetihi

g/m3

What is this graph showing me?

This graph is displaying Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus concentrations over the selected time period. You can adjust this period by changing the dropdowns. These records form the basis for the state and trend indicators displayed on the dashboard. This data is raw and has not had any methodology applied to it.

Trend

Sample history at this site

What is this graph showing me?

Some sites have telemetry monitoring systems in place that can provide up to the minute data. At
this site the following live data measurements are available. Click on the data type for more information.

Flow

Last 7 days

Last 30 days

Last 12 months

What is this graph showing me?

The live flow estimate for this site.

Live data has not been checked for accuracy before displaying. To give you an idea about how much water that is, 0.7 cumecs (m3/sec) would fill an Olympic swimming pool in an hour. A flow of 42 cumecs (m3/sec) would fill the same pool in a minute.

Water Temperature

Last 7 days

Last 30 days

Last 12 months

What is this graph showing me?

The temperature of the water.

Disclaimer

The Environmental Data produced by this page should be used as a guide only. LAWA takes no responsibility for the accuracy of information presented, and accepts no liability for actions taken of others based on this information.

Ecology

Ecological data for this site

Can I trust this data?

This dashboard shows the results from macroinvertebrate sampling at this site. It displays three ecological indicators: macroinvertebrate community index, taxonomic richness and percent EPT.

For sites where State is 'N/A' or Trend is 'Not Assessed', there are not enough data to calculate a State and/or Trend result. Click on an indicator to see the available historical data.

MCI

5 year median: {{medians.MciMedian}}

State

{{medians.MciText | uppercase}}

Trend

{{medians.TrendText}}

The Macroinvertebrate Community Index uses aquatic macroinvertebrates to assess the health of streams in New Zealand.

MCI sample history at this site

Showing:

–

MCI for Makotuku at Raetihi

MCI score

What do the icons mean?

EXCELLENT

MCI score of more than 119. Streams in excellent ecological condition. Indicative of excellent water quality and/or habitat conditions.

GOOD

MCI between 100 and 119. Streams in good ecological condition. Indicative of good water quality and/or habitat conditions.

FAIR

MCI between 80 and 99. Streams in fair ecological condition. Indicative of only fair water quality and/or habitat condition.

Taxonomic richness is the number of different taxa present in an ecological community identified to the best possible level.

Taxa richness history at this site

Showing:

–

Taxa richness for Makotuku at Raetihi

Number of taxa

Percent EPT richness

The median of the last 5 years of data

{{medians.EptMedian}}

EPT are macroinvertebrates that are sensitive to water pollution. These are Ephemeroptera (mayfly), Plecoptera (stonefly) and Trichoptera (caddisfly).

EPT history at this site

Showing:

–

Percent EPT richness for Makotuku at Raetihi

EPT %

Can I trust this data?

The Cawthron Institute has worked alongside regional councils to verify the processes and methods used for macroinvertebrate data collection, processing of the data in the laboratory, quality control in the field and laboratory and the statistical analysis and interpretation of the results presented.

Macroinvertebrates are sampled at this site as part of council's stream health monitoring programme, as recommended by proposed national guidelines.

Sampling - Frequency

Macroinvertebrate sampling is done annually or more frequently at this site as recommended by proposed national guidelines. Therefore, data shown here follow current best practice guidelines.

Sampling - Protocols

This site is a hard-bottomed site and appropriate sampling protocols have been applied. Data shown here have been collected using current best-practice.

Sampling - Habitat

Macroinvertebrate sampling is done in riffle habitat at this site. Data shown here are therefore following best practice.

Sampling - Stand-down period

This council does not collect any macroinvertebrate samples for up to two weeks after a flood greater than three times the median flow as recommended by proposed national guidelines. Therefore, data collected at this site is following best practice.

Processing - Protocol

Samples at this site have been processed following sampling potocols P2 or P3 and data have been processed following best practice.

Quality Control - Field

Field data collected at this site had no quality control applied to it.

Quality Control - Lab

Data processed at this site has had one of the three Laboratory Quality Control Protocols (i.e., QC1, QC2,Q C3) applied. Data shown here is more robust than data with no laboratory QC applied.