Thursday, June 30, 2016

In a June 20 letter from the FBI to the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office obtained by the Sentinel, the agency requests that law enforcement “immediately notify the FBI of any [records] requests your agency received” so “the FBI can seek to prevent disclosure..."

Jeepers, why would they do that? Maybe there is massive fraud involved? Well, we can't have the TRUTH coming out now, can we?

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Fast and Furious was not a "Botched operation", it was not a "Sting", it wasn't a "Law Enforcement Action".

It was a political action. It was deliberate. It was done to undermine the rights of the American People.

The only thing "botched" about it was the cover-up. It wouldn't have been exposed had not a Federal Agent been killed as a result of it. As long as it was mere mortal "civilians" on either side of the border being killed, the program would have continued apace. I do not doubt that other similar operations are ongoing.

But, we may rest assured the vast majority of ATF guys and all Federal Law Imposement personnel are super duper good guys who would never do such a thing. Yep, if they even knew of such an operation they would risk their lives and careers exposing every detail. I'm sure of it. Don't you remember the dozens, nay hundreds, of ATF agents who resigned in disgust after learning of their agency's deliberate smuggling operation? Hmmm, me neither.

One of the guns used in the November 13, 2015 Paris terrorist attacks came from Phoenix, Arizona where the Obama administration allowed criminals to buy thousands of weapons illegally in a deadly and futile “gun-walking” operation known as “Fast and Furious.”and,A Report of Investigation (ROI) filed by a case agent in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) tracked the gun used in the Paris attacks to a Phoenix gun owner who sold it illegally, “off book,” Judicial Watch’s law enforcement sources confirm. Federal agents tracing the firearm also found the Phoenix gun owner to be in possession of an unregistered fully automatic weapon, according to law enforcement officials with firsthand knowledge of the investigation.and,The Phoenix gun owner that the weapon was traced back to was found to have at least two federal firearms violations—for selling one weapon illegally and possessing an unregistered automatic—but no enforcement or prosecutorial action was taken against the individual. Instead, ATF leaders went out of their way to keep the information under the radar and ensure that the gun owner’s identity was “kept quiet,” according to law enforcement sources involved with the case. “Agents were told, in the process of taking the fully auto, not to anger the seller to prevent him from going public,” a veteran law enforcement official told Judicial Watch.and,An ATF spokesman, Corey Ray, at the agency’s Washington D.C. headquarters told Judicial Watch that “no firearms used in the Paris attacks have been traced” by the agency. When asked about the ROI report linking the weapon used in Paris to Phoenix, Ray said “I’m not familiar with the report you’re referencing.”

New Docs Show that IRS's Lois Lerner Broke the Law

Lois Lerner, the former chief of the IRS Exempt Organization unit and the figure at the center of the targeting scandal, likely broke the law when she transferred 1.25 million pages of tax-return info to the Justice Department in October of 2010.

and,Federal law prohibits the IRS from sharing tax returns filed with the agency, with very limited exceptions.Will she be prosecuted? No. Why? The same reason Hillary Clinton will not be prosecuted.There is no Justice in the United Socialist State of North America, and therefor, there is no Law.God help us.

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

We must act to prevent countries from fleeing EU.

Money Quote:

"And according to Merkel’s spokesman, Britain hasn’t really left until it invokes Article 50 of the EU treaty pertaining to members leaving before any informal talks on the conditions for its departure are had. According to the spokesman, “if the [UK] government needs a reasonable amount of time to do that, we respect that.”

"One thing is clear: before Britain has sent this request there will be no informal preliminary talks about the modalities of leaving," spokesman Steffen Seibert told a news conference."

I have a question, you'll forgive me for being logical, will the EU use its new continental Army to force retention of States who wish to flee? Have we seen this before in recent history?

Nope. Islam is a religion of peace. It isn't death cult or anything like that. It isn't an organized crime syndicate or anything like that. It isn't a political system mascaraing as a religion or anything like that.

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

The right of the people to be secure in their persons... against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated...The amendment says that you have a right and that it shall not be violated. On its face, a random stop and search of your person without probable cause is a violation of your right to be secure. Now we have a US Supreme Court ruling called Utah v. Strieff.
So, the cops are watching a drug house. A fellow comes along and a cop stops and searches him without probable cause. The cop demands ID, finds out the man has a warrant, and finds drugs on him. Now, in the days before this Supreme Court session, everything discovered pursuant to an unlawful stop and search would be inadmissible due to the initial stop being without PC (this is generally the way it is supposed to work).

But, Justice Thomas says,

"...discovery of a valid, pre-existing, and untainted arrest warrant attenuated the connection between the unconstitutional investigatory stop and the evidence seized..."

Did you get that?

If the cop finds contraband during his unlawful stop and search it magically becomes not unlawful.

Unconstitutional investigatory stops are A-OK, so long as Officer Friendly finds something on you or you have an outstanding warrant. No probable cause. No fourth amendment required. So, if we have this strait, as you walk down the street, a cop can stop you, search you, demand that you ID yourself, and harass you because he wants to. He no longer needs probable cause at all. If he finds no contraband... well, you can bring suit.

"Strieff argues that, because of the prevalence of outstanding arrest warrants in many jurisdictions, police will engage in dragnet searches if the exclusionary rule is not applied. We think that this outcome is unlikely. Such wanton conduct would expose police to civil liability."
If Officer Friendly finds no contraband, you can bring suit. Get butt-hurt over the Officer violating your Fourth Amendment rights? Get over it! What Fourth Amendment? Ha!

I never thought I would agree with Justices Kagan, Sotomayor and Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg, but they said the following:

Sotomayor-"Do not be soothed by the opinion’s technical language: This case allows the police to stop you on the street, demand your identification, and check it for outstanding traffic warrants—even if you are doing nothing wrong."
and,

"If the officer discovers a warrant for a fine you forgot to pay, courts will now excuse his illegal stop and will admit into evidence anything he happens to find by searching you after arresting you on the warrant."
and,

"It says that your body is subject to invasion while courts excuse the violation of your rights. It implies that you are not a citizen... but the subject of a carceral state, just waiting to be cataloged,"

Kagan- "The officer’s incentive to violate the Constitution thus increases: From here on, he sees potential advantage in stopping individuals without reasonable suspicion—exactly the temptation the exclusionary rule is supposed to remove..."
Last question: What is the difference between a cop searching your person without probable cause and a cop searching your home without probable cause? Go ahead. Answer silently to yourself.

Now there is to be no such doctrine as "Fruit from the poisonous tree".

But not to worry, the VAST MAJORITY cops are such good guys that this new authority will never be abused... Oh, well, bad guys, sure. But good folks like you? What are you? Paranoid? Just exactly how much privacy do you think you need? You must be in favor of drug dealers and child molesters getting away with it.

Why don't you just keep your mouth shut, your head down and do as you're told, peasant! What do you think you are? A free man?

You know what? Who fuckin cares anymore? Why bother even making the point. We're so done.

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Why did there seem to be no ambulances at the scene or even arriving with injured people at the hospital (a nurse interviewed in one report said injured people were brought in private vehicles)? Why were injured club patrons being carried by other club-goers past cameras towards the club rather than away from it? And why did they set that person down and stop walking as soon as they appeared to be out of camera range?

and,

So, let’s look at how the event itself played out, starting with how police could wait three hours to re-enter the club and take control of the situation after they had been engaged with the suspect in a shootout three hours earlier? According to a description of the events by USA Today, the shooter entered through a side door and then shot a doorman and numerous others before exiting from the main entrance on the other side of the building. He encountered an off-duty police officer in the parking lot who was working for the club, and they exchanged gunfire. In a disastrous turn of events, this exchange forced the shooter back inside the club. (I’m no armed-siege expert, but isn’t that the very thing you don’t want to happen?)

and,

Some 100 officers from the Orange County Sheriff’s Office and the Orlando Police Department respond to the chaotic scene.”

It sounds from these reports that the rest of the 100 officers remained outside after Mateen entered the club. According to police, it wasn’t until 5 a.m. (the first shots were at 2:02 a.m.) when Mateen told them he had some kind of explosive device on him that they decided to breach the building by ramming it with an armored vehicle.

and,

How could critically wounded people inside the club be left without help for that long, and how many died because of it? ...

Police explained that they could not move against the shooter more quickly because they had to “get armored vehicles on the scene and make sure they had enough personnel.”

The URL to the piece is, https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2016/06/15/orlando-suspicions-multiple-shooters/

Thursday, June 16, 2016

Just One Day After Orlando Terror Attack, Reporters Enter Open Back Door and Explore Terrorist’s Residence

First San Bernadino and now Orlando. Same game, same rules, same "who gives a fuck?". But all the people who own guns and never hurt anyone, are baaaaaaaaaaaaad. Maybe Oathkeepers should mobilize each time one of these events happens. Stuart, are you listening?

“NO OTHER REASONABLE OPTION”

The question is, what would happen if you shot a policeman's dog at his home? What would the policeman do to you? Or a better question would be, what would the policeman get away with doing to you?

But, you say, the cops were on business! What if you were on your business? What if you were walking down the sidewalk in a local neighborhood and dogs approached you barking and snarling, but staying in their yard? Would YOU be "authorized" to shoot them? Could you claim "No other reasonable option?"

I can just hear the audio coming from the dash cam on this one,

"Keep your paws when I can see them! Stop resisting! Stop reaching for my gun!"

"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness..."

It seems that the esteemed General is colluding with Mark Kelly (husband to Gabby Giffords) to form an advocacy group, with the intention of lobbying for universal background checks. That is, universal prior restraints.

Thursday, June 09, 2016

This is video worth your time. It is nearly twenty-nine minutes long. Grab a cup of coffee and watch. Seriously, take a few minutes and watch. I found a link at Rense.com, which led to fbicover-up.com.

It seems the Ninth Circuit court of appeals in Kommifornia has decided that,

"An 11-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said law enforcement officials can require applicants for a concealed weapons permit to show they are in immediate danger or have another good reason for a permit beyond self-defense."Now, we can pretty much assume the Constitution is a dead letter. I suggest you read Ken Royce's Hologram of Liberty.

The Heller and McDonald decisions both require that all lower courts consider the right to Kepp (own and posses) and Bear (carry!) arms is an individual right and the 2nd Amendment protects it. That is the highest law in the land.

A couple of years ago, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals required the State of Illinois to come up with a Shall Issue permitting system to facilitate the concealed carry of firearms by law abiding citizens, or open carry would be the law within the State. Illinois has 120 days to comply. The State complied.

The Kommifornia legislature and the Ninth Circuit Court with both soon be slapped into compliance with the highest law in the land. Either Kommifornia will go open cary with no concealed carry or they will get creative with a new Shall Issue law. They will initially drag their feet as D.C. is doing, but eventually they will probably pattern it after Texas law as Illinois did.

Wednesday, June 01, 2016

Now, tell me again about the Vast Majority, how they are all super duper good guys, who believe in the Constitution and bill of rights, would never do such a thing.

Tell me again how its just a few bad apples who give the whole bunch a bad reputation. Tell me again how we shouldn't judge the whole group.

Hey, Officer Friendly, if you know it is going on, if you witness this and you do not stop THEM from doing this, if you do not make a report, if you do not speak out and denounce this, if you turn a blind eye and allow it to continue, YOU ARE one of THEM.

About Me

I am a former soldier who has traveled a bit of the world and has seen a few things.
I am a Traditional Catholic, and an avid shooter.
I am a logical satirist. Some people call me a smart-ass. I use Logic to point out hypocrisy. Hypocrites will only get angry.
I don't post often, only when motivated to by current events.