I'm terrible at predicting the future, so I'll leave the crystal ball gazing to you concerning what will happen to multicultural America.

Multiracial empires and nations have fallen apart before. It's a pattern in history. So while you're being sarcastic about the notion of multiracial nations breaking apart, refer to history. It's delusional to deny a historical pattern and paint the future with rosy colored fairytale vision. It's arrogant and naive. We're no better than the past.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anti Main

I expect that I will continue to live out the rest of my days in the most multicultural, multiracial, and multireligious nation that the world has ever known.

Without reason there is superstition and dogma. Current dominant consensus in today's society has taught the masses to ignore race and historical fact.

__________________

1: Don't be a member of a Membership structure.2: Don't store large amounts of weapons and ammo. 3: Don't turn your property into a bunker. This only attracts attention and scares the neighbors.4: During cold war periods read and train yourself.5: Don't paper your walls with flags and RACE literature. Keep such material out of your car. Keep your mouth shut on the job.

I am sure a lot of non-white people helped to build this country. Like the Asians who helped build the rail road system. Besides the Native American tribes weren't really all that different than the Germanic tribes during the Roman times. (being spread out and not united together) Given some time they would have probably advanced a lot more over the years and become a more united nation if it weren't for the European people invading their lands. And there are a lot of non-white people who have helped the world and many who will help.

Name them

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amlie

Isn't it kind of selfish to claim a whole country for one race?.

Go tell every non-white country in the world that. They won't listen because they have not been brainwashed like you.

Multiracial empires and nations have fallen apart before. It's a pattern in history. So while you're being sarcastic about the notion of multiracial nations breaking apart, refer to history. It's delusional to deny a historical pattern and paint the future with rosy colored fairytale vision. It's arrogant and naive. We're no better than the past.

Without reason there is superstition and dogma. Current dominant consensus in today's society has taught the masses to ignore race and historical fact.

Time will tell how long it lasts. Mono-racial empires and nations have also fallen apart before. Empires falling apart is indeed a pattern of history. The 3rd Reich lasted 12 years. The 1st and 2nd reichs also disappeared. Whether a nation or empire is mono-racial or multi-racial, it can fall, change or survive depending on many different variables. There was a time not too long ago when "the sun never set on the British Empire." That day is past.
What you call "historical fact" is a biased and stereotyped view of world history.

Empires fall for many reasons. Always when they have become a multiracial empire. For whatever reason the fall of an empire, the nations are formed along racial and ethnic lines always.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anti Maim

Empires falling apart is indeed a pattern of history. The 3rd Reich lasted 12 years. The 1st and 2nd reichs also disappeared.

WWII was racial fratricide. Not a mono-racial empire falling.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anti Maim

Whether a nation or empire is mono-racial or multi-racial, it can fall, change or survive depending on many different variables. There was a time not too long ago when "the sun never set on the British Empire." That day is past.
What you call "historical fact" is a biased and stereotyped view of world history.

Empires or nations that maintain racial homogeneity survive. China and Japan are examples of this model.

You're just about keeping the word "creation" within its accepted usage.

Still, look at my post further upthread. Non-whites are present in former British colonies around the world today precisely because it is the non-whites/non-Britons who were forced to do the building, from black African slaves toiling the land, to Chinese railroad workers who died in their thousands to the peasant German farmers despatched to cultivate the lands of the West.

White Britons "created" North America. The rest of you, whether you're of German, African or Chinese descent, just built it and now occupy it.

Mixing the concept of nationalities with the idea of race. That's one of your mistakes. Germans and Brits are white, not Africans and chinese and other assorted darkies. Darkies were used as beasts of burden. Darkies were not meant to be part of a new white nation as citizens created by whites whether these whites were Brits or Germans and the like.

The original Constitution of The United States of America accounted for three types of persons: Free persons, Indians Not Taxed and Other Persons. There were persons of two different races in the Free Persons category at the time of the ratification of the Constitution and there were non-white persons in the "other persons" category. The words "white" or "black" do not appear in the Constitution.
Prior to the ratification of the Constitution, the new United States of America operated under The Articles of Confederation. That document stated: "better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different States in this Union, the free inhabitants of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; and the people of each State shall have free ingress and redress to and from any other State, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties impositions and restrictions, as the inhabitants thereof respectively."
At the time of the ratification of the Articles of Confederation there were also free inhabitants who were white, black, mixed race and American Indian.

So where do the words "our posterity" fit into your explanation?

The slaves were not the people, and their descendants aren't their posterity. The same goes for immigrants.

Black African slaves for the cotton and sugar industries were then imported en masse by white Americans to profit white Americans. Next, human rights philosophy gained traction and Abolition and workers' movements began to flourish all across the industrialisng world - eventually leading to civil rights for black Americans in the 1960s and finally turning America into a full democracy.

That's a nice way to spin the illegitimate enfranchisement of blacks. Who gave the white elite the right to a) import black slaves and then b) free them amongst the white populace without the latter's consent? You?

Riddle me this batman: why wasn't putting them on boats back to Africa the right thing to do, if putting them on boats to America in the first place was the wrong thing to do?

Could you please answer this for me? I've asked this same ****ing question of you antis for years now and I've never once gotten an answer.

Quote:

Natives and illegal immigrants aside, the only reason why non-whites live in America is exclusively because they have in waves been brought to America by white men to be exploited.

So the right thing to do is to send them home. Right?

Quote:

White Americans have nothing or anybody else to "blame" for this mutli-racial society from which most white Americans have profited economically through the provision of affordable goods and services on the backs of cheap imported labour.

So whites are to blame...that means we aren't allowed to fix the problem?

Quote:

If you say you now want the minorities out then you should not have exploited them in the first place.

I'm curious, if we're so exploitative, why is the 3rd world falling all over itself to immigrate here? Wouldn't it be safer to live away from whitey?

I'm also curious - you're clearly a limey, are you Irish? Lot's of ignorant mick commies out there...

***************************************
God Bless the memories of Sir Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt who saved the free, peaceful and democratic world from the politically bankrupt and dark satanic hordes of Nazism.[/QUOTE]

The slaves were not the people, and their descendants aren't their posterity. The same goes for immigrants.

The Preamble does not establish the law of the land. It sets the stage for the framework of the government. If it said "our WHITE posterity" you'd have a point. It doesn't.
At the time of the ratification of the Constitution, there were nearly 60,000 free blacks in the US who were not slaves; some who were manumitted as a result of volunteering to fight in the Continental Army. By the time of the Emancipation Proclamation, there were nearly half a million Free Blacks living in the Northern states.
Slaves figured prominently in the Constitution as their numbers were used to balance out the representation between the North which had the most free whites and the South which had the most enslaved blacks and indentured servant whites.
White women were not granted equal citizenship rights like white men in the Constitution either, in fact Black men got full citizenship rights and the franchise 50 years before white women.