Orrin's All-Time Top Ten (or twelve) List - Political

What kind of life would lead a man (in my lifetime
all have been men) to think he ought to be
President. . . . What in their backgrounds
could give them that huge ambition, that kind of motor,
that will and discipline, that faith in themselves?
. . . What happened to those lives, to their wives,
to their families, to the lives they shared?
What happened to their ideas of themselves? What did
we do to them, on the way to the White House?
-Richard
Ben Cramer, What it Takes

This epic tale (over 1000 pages) of the pursuit of the 1988 Presidential
nominations is the best book ever written about the unique breed of men
who seek our highest office, and may well be the best nonfiction book ever
written, period. The book originally came out in the middle of the 1992
campaign and the universal first reaction was : Who's going to read about
the last campaign in the middle of the next one? But the genius of
the book is that Richard Ben Cramer isn't truly interested in the campaign
itself; he's interested in the campaigners; and so the book is timeless.

He focuses on George Bush and Bob Dole on the Republican side and Gary
Hart, Joe Biden, Dick Gephardt and Michael Dukakis on the Democratic side.
Instead of giving us a campaign diary or obsessing over the minutiae of
the candidates strategies (a form created by Theodore White and perfected
by Jack Germond and Jules Witcover), he provides virtual biographies of
each man and an intimate portrait of why each of them wants to be, and
is in position to be, President of the United States.

It's the in thing these days to be utterly contemptuous of politicians
and in truth they have done much to earn that contempt. But in Cramer's
hands, even two of our least articulate politicians--Bob Dole and George
Bush--turn out to have eloquent, often heroic stories, though neither can
tell them as well as Cramer. Bob Dole in particular has never been
portrayed with greater insight and generosity than he is in these pages.
In fact, the Dole sections were later excerpted and issued as a quickie
Dole biography during the 1996 campaign. That provided one of the
most devastating moments of the Clinton presidency. Tim Russert had
Cramer and David Maraniss (author of the outstanding Clinton bio, First
in His Class) on Meet the Press to discuss the men they'd written
about. At the end of the interview he asked Cramer : Is there anything
about Bob Dole that you wish the voters knew, but don't?

Cramer : Yes, that he is much nicer, funnier, more
decent man than they perceive him to be.
Unlike the caricature that comes across on television,
Bob Dole genuinely cares about people.

Russert : Same question to you David Maraniss, about
Bill Clinton.

Maraniss : Yes, that he's a much less decent man
than they perceive him to be. Unlike the persona
he presents on TV, Bill Clinton does not particularly
care for other people ; he cares about himself.

That's not a verbatim transcript but it really was that harsh.

It's pretty obvious that Cramer feels that only Gary Hart had a genuine
vision of what he wanted to do with the Presidency if he won it, and for
that reason, Hart becomes a kind of tragic figure as he self destructs.
Biden on the other hand turns out to be a non-starter, thanks to his unfortunate
tendency to exaggerate, though Cramer clearly enjoyed his young-man-on-the-make
antics. Gephardt is the only candidate who really comes across as
a loathsome creature. He seems not to have any core beliefs, any
personal ethics, or any internal checks on his own ambition. Even
Dukakis, who Cramer seems to respect more than like, emerges as a hard
working, well intentioned, American success story.

Ultimately, of course, the book is George Bush's because he won.
In some sense he had more of "What it Takes," more of the "Right Stuff"
than the others. The George Bush of these pages is a humble, reticent,
decent, staff man who is finally in line for the big job. Delving
into his WASPy background, Cramer shows how the same insistence on manners,
graciousness, public service, deference, and loyalty, which had been drummed
into him from youth, and had served him so well throughout his life, were
ill suited to the campaign trail. Though he manages to defeat Dukakis,
it becomes clear how unlikely a President he was for the modern age.
There's a famous incident which nicely captures the dilemma of being George
Bush, when his mother, who must have been in her nineties by then, assessed
his campaign style by telling him he was talking about himself to much.
Such things simply aren't done in their social milieu. As it turned
out, the book was an excellent guide to the 1992 campaign--what chance
did a man who was trained not to dwell on himself have against Bill Clinton
and the new baby boomer politics he was creating ?

In fact, the three villains of the book are political consultants, journalists
and the process itself. As Cramer juxtaposes the varied but equally
compelling life stories of these very different men against the fairly
humiliating things that the campaign requires of them, you can't help but
wonder what "What It Takes" to become President actually has to do with
the job at hand. The consultants seem like little more than pimps.
The media comes across as utterly unserious, interested not in substance,
but in shrieking gotcha whenever someone makes a mistake, or contradicts
himself however slightly, or a youthful indiscretion is exposed.
In the end, the process resembles a perp walk at a police station, rather
than any kind of serious deliberation over who'll make the best President.

Cramer uses the techniques of New Journalism, often sounding exactly
like Tom Wolfe, to render the story in a novelistic fashion. This
can be disconcerting when he brazenly presents someone's thoughts from
forty years earlier, and some will find his use of Big Concepts as leitmotifs
to be contrived or overly mannered, but if you liked The
Right Stuff, you'll have no trouble dealing with these devices.

If this were a novel, there would be no doubt in my mind that it was
the
Great American Novel. But, amazingly enough, it's all true.
These men really exist and they really did all put themselves through the
grueling process of running for president. We want our presidential
candidates to be heroic figures, but then we put them though an oftentimes
degrading process that supposedly determines whether they are fit to lead.
Before you judge either George W. or Al Gore too harshly, read this book
and find out what it takes to run for president.

GENERAL :
-ESSAY
: The Democrats in '88 (William Schneider, Atlantic Monthly, April,
1987)
-ESSAY
: A Democrat who Admits It : Richard Gephardt is unafraid to say that
the government should spend money on big public programs -- things that
other Democrats said before they echoed Republicans (James Fallows, The
Atlantic Monthly)