Pritzker ad walks back promise of tax relief for Illinoisans

Gov. J.B. Pritzker has hinged many of his promises on his hope the state will adopt a graduated, or “progressive,” income tax hike. But tax relief for 97 percent of Illinoisans is no longer a guaranteed part of that package, according to a new ad.

A TV ad titled “Hole” was released March 21 by Think Big Illinois, a nonprofit advocacy group that lists Pritzker among its donors. It walks back the claim that Pritzker’s tax plan would deliver an income tax cut for 97 percent of Illinoisans, which was a major selling point when Pritzker’s administration launched its “fair tax” campaign March 7.

Instead, the latest ad shows the governor promising taxpayers “will not see an income tax increase” – as opposed to seeing a tax cut. Given the miniscule tax breaks promised in his plan, dumping the tax break claim should come as no surprise.

Take the typical married-couple family in Illinois with two children. That family makes $94,675 a year, according to the most recent data from the U.S. Census Bureau, and gets a deduction for paying the statewide median property tax bill of $4,692 per year. Pritzker’s plan promises $131 in tax relief for this family, or $5.03 on a paycheck every other week. And “relief” is relative: That same family just had its state income tax hiked about $1,000 in 2017.

Not seeing a tax increase is different than receiving a tax cut. And while the governor’s office has so far failed to make public the full details supporting the plan – despite multiple Freedom of Information Act requests from the Illinois Policy Institute – what scarce information is available suggests ordinary taxpayers would not be protectedfrom tax hikes under that system.

That’s because not only does Pritzker’s plan fall short of its revenue estimate, but it also falls far short of the funds needed to account for Pritzker’s proposed additional spending. To pay for the governor’s spending promises, typical Illinois families would have to endure a $3,500 tax hike.

“Workers deserve an income tax cut and a property tax break,” the governor said during his Feb. 20 budget address. If recent history is any indication, Pritzker’s progressive tax proposal would achieve neither. In Connecticut – the only state in 30 years to switch from a flat to progressive income tax – middle class income taxes have risen by 13 percent, while property taxes have spiked by over 35 percent, measured as a share of income.

While Connecticut’s economy has floundered since adopting a progressive system in 1996, states such as Kentucky and North Carolina have scrapped their progressive taxes. Kentucky just did it last year to become more competitive and North Carolina’s economy improved after they made the move. The nonpartisan Tax Foundation recommended Wisconsin do the same to become more competitive.

Pritzker’s tax plan would make Illinois’ unfriendly business climate even more hostile. Small businesses create the vast majority of new jobs in Illinois. Pritzker’s progressive tax plan would pummel a significant chunk of that community. The state’s business climate would plummet to 48th in the nation if it adopted Pritzker’s graduated income tax, according to the Tax Foundation.

Pritzker’s goals are honorable: His desire to deliver tax relief to the middle class, pass a balanced budget and restore the state economy signals an understanding of the symptoms of decades of fiscal mismanagement.

But the progressive tax is the wrong answer, and an answer that the experts and evidence say will make Illinois’ problems worse.

Only through commonsense – and bipartisan – measures such as pension reform, school district efficiency and a spending cap can Pritzker arrive at a better plan. Fortunately, that plan already exists.

It’s up to the governor to summon the political courage to pursue it.

Want to get notified whenever we write about
Illinois Policy Institute
?

Sign-up
Next time we write about
Illinois Policy Institute,
we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.