Hi All,
From: "Pal-Kristian Engstad" <engstad@naughtydog.com>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Caml productivity.
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:22:32 -0700
> Now, I am not saying that C or C++ is inherently that much better. Even
> gcc's inline syntax is really awkward in practice. But I would love to see a
> superior system in ocaml! So, what is needed in order to support inline
> assembly in ocaml? Is it at all possible?
Arity/Prolog had inline C. It was very, _very_ useful.
Alexander
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners