The Resulting Shadow

Sunday, November 29, 2015

In a book titled ‘Confessions of an Ivy League Frat Boy’,
Andrew Lohse, a former brother of Dartmouth’s Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) exposes
his experiences both as a pledge and active member of the fraternity in an
effort to abolish fraternities. Anti-Greek system
activist when expressing their concern and demand for the abolishment of this
American institution often references his book. SAE is the same fraternity that
made headlines for a leaked video showing members of the University of
Oklahoma’s chapter chanting racial epitaphs on a fraternity chartered bus last
March. Headlines such as these have placed the entire Greek system under the
national spotlight for all the wrong reasons. The chant had references to
lynching and indicated that the fraternity should never admit African-American
students; the traditional Greek system has a foundation of racial and
socioeconomic exclusivity. In the immediate aftermath issues of race and racism
within the Greek system came to the forefront at OU as well as campuses across
the country.

At the University of Oklahoma, President David L. Boren
met with representatives of the Interfraternity Council, National Pan-Hellenic
Council [historically the black Greek system] and the Multicultural Greek
Council to have the necessary dialogue on the issues revolving around Greek
life. Discussions and protests on issues of race in the Greek system took place
on university and college campuses across the country. The reaction from the
nation climaxed in the expulsion of the students seen leading the chant and the
fraternity chapter had its university recognition revoked. This national
attention has led some public figures to speak out in support of the
abolishment of the Greek system as a whole. As Nicholas Syrett, author of The Company He
Keeps, states “It is about power and prestige where fraternity men
must rely upon their Whiteness, socio-economic status, masculinity, and heterosexuality
to prove themselves to one another and women.”
Recently, the Greek system has been in the news more and more frequently
in regards to rampant misogyny, sexual assault, deaths of pledges and members,
and exposure of racist traditions. I found an article written by Joseph Rago, in which he reviews Lohse’s book.
He makes claims that Andrew Lohse’s experience, as a member of SAE is severely
dramatized and full of exaggeration.

More often than not, these issues surround organizations
within the Interfraternity council. This is a council made up of organizations
who, until very recently, maintained gender-segregated, racial and
socioeconomic requirements in order to be considered for memberships. Leaks
such as what happened in OU are becoming more frequent and the movement to
abolish the Greek system is rapidly gaining momentum. With so much evidence, it
is no wonder why people like Will Ferrell, a member of USC’s Delta Tau Delta
Chapter, are speaking out in support of the abolishment of the Greek system on
university campuses across the country. In an interview with New York Times, Ferrell stated “The incident
in Oklahoma, that is a real argument for getting rid of the system altogether,
in my opinion, even having been through a fraternity...because when you break
it down, it really is about creating cliques and clubs and being exclusionary,
Fraternities were started as academic societies that were supposed to have a
philanthropic arm to them. And when it’s governed by those kinds of rules, then
they’re still beneficial. But you’ve got to be careful.”

As such, it is no
surprise that institutionalized racism is embedded in the organizations’
founding; Greek organizations experienced explosive growth in the wake of the
Civil War, partly as a response to increased racial and gender diversity on
campuses. With the advent of social media and recording devices it was only a
matter of time before these practices became exposed. The media has dedicated
segments on informing the public about the issues surrounding Greek lettered
fraternities. However when blanket statements are made about Greek
organizations as a whole it severely damages organizations whose very creation
was a response to the lack of access to traditional all white fraternities.
Multicultural Greek organizations often serve critical roles in the community,
yet they rarely receive the positive press that’s often reserved for ‘traditional’
Greeks and are subject to heavy criticism for branding themselves as
fraternities or sororities. These organizations were created to provide
brotherhood and sisterhood for underrepresented students who face barriers to
attaining higher education. Members from these demographics are too often not
welcomed in other Greek letter organizations, and as a result have formed their
own organizations and councils as a means of empowerment in the pursuit of
equity. Nontraditional Greeks serve a legitimate purpose to disenfranchised
students on campus the broader university community by providing a pathway for
development of future leaders that seek to break through the established mold.

Type in Greek Fraternity in a
search engine and you will find an overwhelming amount of news articles
reporting abuses of privilege by organizations such as Sigma Alpha Epsilon.
With established footholds on university administrations, corporate boardrooms,
and public offices across the country, these organizations have been able to
enjoy years of protection from university standards and, occasionally, the rule
of law. Buried behind all of this negative publicity are the other
organizations whose only affiliation with traditional all white fraternities
are the use of Greek letters and systems. Black and Latino Greeks have a long
history of providing role models to undergraduate students; this connection
provides first-generation students with the opportunity to learn from alumni in
their community who have had to navigate college before them. These types of
connections allow groups to pass down effective study and networking methods
that have positive impacts on the professional and personal development of its
members. In an article with the New Haven Register Donald McAulay, a member of
the historically black fraternity Phi Beta Sigma, stated fraternities “also
produce a good number of educated African-American and Latino men who
understand the challenges facing the urban community with a desire and mission
to make a difference.” These multicultural organizations have evolved by
minorities that had minimal, if any, representation in the regular Greek
councils. More focally, they aspire to increase awareness about their
respective group’s presence on college campuses. If there was no such thing as
a “multicultural fraternity”, I would not be a member of a Greek organization
today. I say this because I have found that these organizations meet the unique
needs I face as a first generation Latino college student. When people think “fraternity” or “sorority”
they picture big mansions on the green with an elite membership and some sort
of high-class network with privileges and fun times handed to you in exchange
for thousand-dollar dues. This fragmented stereotype is used in the argument to
abolish Greek systems as a whole and ignores the evolution of the Greek system
over the past century to now include a kaleidoscope of organizations. What
Greek system abolitionist need to realize is that there are active
organizations on these same campuses that operate effective community service
and academic services using a fraction of the budgets available to traditional
fraternities (and who often spend the lion’s share of said budgets on decadent
social parties).

As the momentum to abolish Greek systems as a whole
continues to grow, the future looks grim. Federal authorities have threatened
to withhold federal university funding in order to evoke effective change from
the administrative level and some campuses are phasing out Greek councils. This
is a direct result of a national anti-Greek system petition. What is also at
risk is the abolishment and marginalization of multicultural Greek
organizations whose establishment was a direct response to the monolithic and
exclusionary all white Greek system.

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is one of the most
ambitious trade deals the global economy has ever seen. Encompassing 40% of
global GDP and a third of its trade, the 12 nations who are negotiating stand
to see benefits resulting from the easing of trade restrictions amongst such a
massive bloc. More importantly than lowering already historically low tariffs,
the TPP hopes to create a set of coherent quasi-global labor, environmental,
and intellectual property standards. Its intention is to “define the rules of
the road” for Asian trade according to Michael Froman, America’s chief
negotiator.

Despite the great benefits expected from greater trade
related gains, these will not necessarily benefit all countries involved
equally. The elimination of trade barriers will disproportionately benefit the
most efficient countries and industries. While countries which had coddled
their industries with generous protections will see declining market share due
to increased competition. The TPP will not be helpful to all countries in the same
way or for the same reasons.

Vietnam provides an
example of the uneven benefits that TPP’s members will see. Vietnam is a
developing nation which is estimated by many experts to receive some of the
biggest increases to GDP as a result of the TPP. It is expected to see an
increase of 11% to its GDP by 2025. With its combination of a large and young
workforce, high productivity and low wages, the country stands to see
manufacturing industry expansion as everything from car parts, textiles and
other manufactured goods can be exported tariff free to America and Japan. In
addition the exclusion of China from this deal means that Vietnamese
manufacturers will see a comparative advantage when exporting to rich countries
compared to their Chinese competitors.

In addition there as of yet unaccounted benefits that will
come to Vietnam as a result of a set of rules that it will have to adhere to
that will steer it towards a more open economic environment. Restrictions on
SOE’s which it protested but will likely free its private sector to become more
efficient and innovative as its allowed to flourish. The state controlled
behemoths will be forced to loosen their grip on the economy and may eventually
fade away Vietnam could see the emergence of its own private enterprise titans,
just as South Korea did after it opened up its trade. Due to the rule setting
nature of the TPP, the benefits to developing countries will be twofold better
labor and environmental standards will help all, and fair rules will help
entrench Anglo-American capitalism which has proven to be a powerful force for
growth when embraced by developing nations.

However, in reality there may be some “losers” in these
deal, primarily developed nations with inefficient industries that currently
benefit from some degree of exclusivity. Canada stands as a prime example the
plight of developed countries that sign on to this agreement. It has a highly
developed economy is tightly integrated with America’s benefitting greatly from
its current free trade agreement NAFTA, encompassing the U.S., Canada and
Mexico.

Manufacturing in Canada is an important part of the supply
chains of Americans manufacturers. As a result the availability of a new source
of cheap parts from Asia will directly hurt Canadian industry. The auto sector
has already been promised a billion dollar handout to help it cope. (Keenan) In
addition dairy manufacturers and the agricultural sector in Canada which is
less efficient than the American and Australian sectors, and kept profitable
through heavy restrictions on imports and a system of tariffs and quotas will
definitely lose in this deal. Ottawa responded with a series of measures to
support agriculture worth five billion dollars. Ultimately the country and its
consumers will benefit from lower priced goods and products allowing increased
consumption, however for all its costs Canada is expected to receive a
negligible change to GDP as a result of the TPP.

The challenge then is for industrialized countries to create
a system within their country that equitably shares the gains from trade, while
developing nations must cope with a significant upgrade to their
labor/environmental laws. Better enforcement and information gathering would
help both tremendously with this endeavor. Luckily the world has seen the need
for a system to maintain the rule of law in the face of serious challenges and
compromise seems possible on even the thorniest issues.

The TPP represents more than just a chance to boost GDP for
developed nations, it is being pushed through despite its potential to hurt
vested interests in certain nations due to its greatest strength. An
encompassing and enforceable regulatory environment binding so much of the
world economy will ultimately be far more beneficial to all nations, specially
allowed to expand, as every country has a chance to benefit from more open
trade and rules that follow the liberal consensus as opposed to an increasingly
assertive China’s diktat.

Thursday, November 19, 2015

On March 4, 2015, the City Council of Los
Angeles announced the voting of an ordinance granting county residents the
right to plant fruits and vegetables in the parkways directly in front of their
homes. The parkways are defined as city owned land, usually covered with grass
that separates the sidewalk from the street. Until now, the only greenery
allowed, without a $400.00 permit or fine for non-compliance, were grasses and
some shrubs. For years community groups such as activist and south central
resident Ron Finley’s LA Green Grounds have pressed the city council that a
solution to the lack of access to fresh fruits and vegetables is to allow the
community to utilize parkways and city land as gardens. Community groups argue
that this change in policy can improve and empower the poorer neighborhoods by
not only taking ownership of their own gardens but also their health. The
community of south Los Angeles that surrounds the University of Southern
California is made up of a large Latino and African American population. Both
demographics are plagued with high numbers of preventable health diseases that
are influenced by the quality of food and diets available to the
community. If this ordinance passes the
Mayor’s office successfully in can have major implications on the neighborhoods
of south Los Angeles including University Park.

The lack of access to food may not be
apparent to the average freshman at the University of Southern California. In
fact the University is surrounded by over fifty restaurants and cafes. Just
take a northbound drive on Figueroa Street and by the time you cross Adams
Boulevard you will have already encountered almost every fast food restaurant
you can think of, most of which cater to the student body by operating 24 hours
a day. There are also 2 grocery stores, for those looking to cook at home, both Ralph's and Fresh and Easy offer fresh produce at reasonable prices. That is 2
grocery stores per 50 plus fast food establishments. Ron Finley has been one of
the leaders in the “Grow Your Own” movement. He along with other activist have
long argued that residents can break away from the dependency on fast food
restaurants to feed them and regain control of their health by initiating and
maintaining community gardens. In a recent TED Talk, Finley states “Just like
26.5 million other Americans, I live in a fast food desert, south central Los
Angeles, home of the drive-thru and the drive-by. Funny thing is, the
drive-thrus are killing more people than the drive-bys. People are dying from
curable diseases in south central Los Angeles.”

According to Los Angeles Department of
Public Health records, the populations with the highest rates of diabetes are
minorities. The Latino population at 13.5 percent and African Americans with
12.4 percent. Type two diabetes and other preventable diseases are heavily
influenced by diet. A change in policy is a step in the right direction for the
city of Los Angeles, who until now has allowed well-funded special interest
groups control over space such as the controversial South Central Farms case of
the early 2000's.

The combination of education on the
subjects of horticulture and sustainable health diets needs to start in local
schools and practiced in the neighborhood. The financial savings and
beautification of the streets can be communicated to residents who will thus be
empowered to control their environment and health. The ordinance currently sitting on Mayor Eric
Garcetti’s desk has 4 days to be approved by his office. If he signs it, it
could take effect before the upcoming carrot and cucumber planting season.

Saturday, November 14, 2015

Since 1980, the state
of California built one university compared to 22 prisons. These prisons are
filled with a majority of African Americans and Latinos. The conversation
surrounding the privatization of prisons is closely linked to profiteering off
the effects of policies such as immigration and drug abuse. An article by the Los Angeles Timesdiscusses Gov. Jerry
Brown’s plan for an increase of 1oo million toward private prisons.

There are more American Citizens
in prison today than in any country in the world. With the demographics of
those incarcerated being largely people of color. Although Latinos make up 16
percent of the total population in the United States, they make up just under half of the population in
prison.

To be transparent, the rise of Latinos incarcerated is not because
they are committing more crimes. The rise has to do with what drives our world:
Money. The private prison industry is making a great deal of profit by
incarcerating innocent immigrants who left their country for a better future.
And money aside, the fact that we are incarcerating people for trying to
provide for their family is just morally impermissible. Liberty is embedded in
the values for which the country was founded. Something has to be done.

Private prisons were officially introduced
in the late eighties when the Corrections
Corporation of America (CCA) was awarded a contract to take over
a facility in Hamilton County, Tennessee. This constituted
the first jail operated in full by a private company. It served as a good
service model at the beginning which made the CCA very popular in the state
ending in them trying to serve the whole state for a contract of 200 million
dollars, and with that the rest is history.

Currently the US issues contracts to the CCA to jail more than
23,000 people in this country for a pretty big amount of money, 5 billion
dollars. To put that in perspective, that is 25 times more in only no more than
3 decades. You may wonder, how did that happen? Active participation of the
private prison industry during election times as well as lobbying. According to
theWashington Post, this industry has spent more than 25
million dollars to court legislator to pass laws that benefit the cause.
That cause seeks to impose larger stays in prison and harder punishment to
potential “costumers” including immigrants with the end result on bigger
contracts leading to corporate executives creating and maximizing the greatest
amount of profit.

Clearly
it is a good market model (and highly immoral). Immigrants serve as the
product, tax payers pick up the bill, and private prison industries rack up the
profits.

It
is tragic the way our current system operates. Just a couple of weeks ago I
heard Gov. Sanders speaking about ending the statutory detention quotas. For
those who don’t know what this quota means, it simply states that the quota
requires U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold an average of
34,000 individuals in detention on a daily basis. Consequently, it is to expect
that a great deal of individuals are incarcerated for immigration reasons which
increases the profit for this industry.

On
the contrary, the nation’s population of illegal immigrants has dropped over the last few years, so officials are forced to fill the spaces in order
to meet quotas. Along with all the policies that lobbyist pushed it creates a
balance for people to stay longer and keep meeting the quota for financial
purposes.

Thus,
officials have turned their interest from looking to apprehend individuals who
pose a threat to public safety to low profile undocumented families in order to
meet quotas more efficiently. It makes sense why Latinos are leading the chart,
the odds of finding a Latino without proper documentation of citizenship is
much greater than any other race and it serves as a sufficient reason to put
people behind bars.

Private prisons are poisonous, degrading and hurtful to society.
It is wrong, immoral and it needs to end. Thus, we should reevaluate the way we spend
money in incarceration by using private prisons. Instead, we should channel
those efforts into the main roots of the issue. By investing time and money on
education in minorities the solution could seem less far fetched.

Monday, November 2, 2015

Lately I have been traveling to different states on weekly
basis due to my work and interviews with other companies as I wrap up my
college education. The traveling made me realize that each state has its pros
and cons. From the beautiful Disneyworld in Florida to the Rocky Mountains in
Colorado one thing became evident as I made conversations with locals,
California is known for high taxes and traffic. The latter grabbed my attention
as I often come across projects that seek ways to mitigate issues related to
traffic. Currently I work in Santa Monica and my commute is perhaps one of the
worst highlights of my job. The distance is only 11 miles however it takes me
around 50 min to 1 hour to get to work (that’s an average speed of 12-13 mph).
In addition, I am sure anyone living in Los Angeles can relate to the
occasional heavy traffic at 1am on a normal weekend. The issue is a little
complex and it goes beyond planning and traffic engineering. So what’s going
on?

As a kid, I often wondered why the state build more lanes on
the freeway or make double decker freeways (see picture below) to mitigate the
demand of cars. But after some classes in traffic management, and
transportation engineering I understood the concept that building more lanes
only causes more traffic. In recent years traffic engineers understood that you
can’t build your way out of congestion because studies show that the road
themselves are what cause more traffic.

The economist Matthew
Turner of the University of Toronto and Gilles
Duranton of the University of Pennsylvania took a closer look
at this phenomenon. The concept they used is called “induced demand” which is
the way economist think when a product is delivered (in this case the roads)
makes the end user to want to use it even more. Although research has been made
before it was not until recent years that people collected enough data to make
a plausible conclusion. This shows that the development of new roads are
ineffective because the irrationality of the population when it comes to trying
to avoid traffic in a highly congested city.

What the economist decided to do was to compare the amount
of new roads and highways built in different U.S. cities between 1980 and 2000,
and the total number of miles driven in those cities over the same period.

“We found that there’s this perfect
one-to-one relationship,” said Turner.The studies showed that if road capacities increased by X
amount then the amount of driving also increased by X amount. Although the
results are rather shocking the data is consistent along the whole study."As you add roads to a city
those roads get filled up. There are people waiting to use that capacity. The
result on transit is almost exactly the opposite of that." Turner added.

It could be that traffic engineers are building the roads
based on the need of the community and their predicted traffic model fits
perfectly with current traffic but Turner and Duranton thinks that it is highly
unlikely. Their argument is based on the fact that the modern interstate
network are closely related to the original plan developed by the federal
government in 1947 and it is hard to believe that the engineers at the time
could predict traffic behavior half a century in the future.

The study also took a look at public transportation and the
results were alike. More trains, buses, troll systems, etc. created more users
but that didn’t seem to relieve the traffic problem. I always thought of fluid
dynamics as a model for traffics. In fluid dynamics you expect that by
replacing a smaller pipe with a bigger pipe the pressure of the flow will drop
causing a better flow. However, this is not the case for traffic, when you
replace current roads with wider roads the traffic remains the same. It makes
me wonder, where are this new drivers coming from? Were they included in the
previous system before the widening of the roads?

According to a wired.com it has to do with what new roads
allow people to do: to be able to move around. If you enable the possibility of
driving more, they will do it more, causing to have more people willing to move
farther away from work and therefore being forced to drive into town. It also
means that if the widening of the streets causes an easier drive then it is
more likely that drivers will jump in the car more often. Additionally, if
there is more incoming traffic, businesses tend to develop faster which create
extra traffic. The author argues that as long as the road remain cheap and
accessible, people tend to overuse roads.

Interestingly, the study also showed that the phenomenon
seems to work in reverse too. That is, when lanes are closed, population
expects traffic to become much more chaotic. But the data shows that nothing
too terrible occurs, that traffic readjust itself and congestion remains
relatively constant.

So is this a never ending circle? Can we actually reduce
traffic? Turner thinks that traffic
congestion could be solved if the right policies are formed and enforced.
According to Turner we use our roads system ineffective because we have a
central authority setting the standards and prices for our public
transportation. In other worlds we all obtain what we want: roads, and we get
charged next to nothing. So is he suggesting a privatization of all roads? What
Turner and Duranton suggest is what they call congestion pricing.

That means raising fees when the traffic demand is high and
lower fees or make it free when traffic is low. In Los Angeles there are many
freeways that already include this systems but it would be interesting to see
whether or not it would have a drastic effect when applied to all roads across
Los Angeles. The challenge with that is that voters don’t tend to pass these
plans because it is hard to accept to pay for something that used to be free.

They also think that if congestion pricing is not doable,
then cities should look into mitigating that traffic by surcharging parking
fees in order to make the community more cognizant of parking.

“Because it’s free, people will
misuse it and it will be full all the time,” said Duranton. Drivers searching
for parking contribute significantly to road congestion. “There are some
estimates that say in the central part of cities up to 30 percent of driving is
people just cruising around for parking,” Duranton said.

It seems to me that their studies pose solutions that are
targeted to increasing prices and start charging for the usage of roads.
Whether it works or not, I would like to think that there is a better way to
mitigate traffic. After all that’s the job of engineers, to find and crea

te
solutions to problems in a way that does not affect current conditions and that
it’s also maximize the resources available.

The question is whether a small fee will make a big impact
and If that’s the only option that mitigates traffic.

Next time you are sitting in traffic, don’t judge “the jerk”
in front of you who just cut you off but the current conditions of our
transportation system.

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

USA TODAY did an analysis a couple of months ago showing
that engineering firms reject Hispanic and black applicants twice as much in
comparison to the rest of applicants. Engineering firms claim that the pool of
applicants lacks of diversity and that the issue is beyond their reach. As a
recent engineering graduate, I witnessed clearly that the amount of minorities
in engineering are somewhat limited. But these claims are not sufficient.
According to Fox News Latino more
Hispanics are graduating college with bachelor’s degrees than ever before. As
of 2014, Latinos accounted for 15% of STEM jobs (also known as Science,
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), it doesn’t seem as much but just 4
years ago Latinos constituted 7% of the population.

It is evident that technology is increasing exponentially,
and it will continue to grow as technology becomes one of the main engines that
drive our current economic market. This will lead to more openings in tech
firms and companies are being pressured to diversify their market. Thus, we
need to look closely at the root of this phenomenon. First, a considerable
amount of minorities do not continue their education due to the lack of
information, resources or even motivation which eliminates a large amount of
potential engineers, mathematicians, etc. Furthermore, a large amount of
minorities attends college but fails to finish their education. To exemplify
this, the graph bellow shows a bar graphs portraying the percent of the population
that finish high school, attend and finish college. In light brown we see that
out of 19% of 18-24 year olds that are enrolled in college only 9% actually
finishes their career (that is a 47% drop out rate) which is daunting.

There are many factors that contribute to this big dropout
rate. Many of the young minorities have to work full time to sustain themselves
while they attend college by working on fast food restaurant, clothing stores
etc. Others get demotivated due to their minimal mentoring and orientation in
earlier stages of their educational career leading to picking up vices and
activities that could hinder their development.
There are many other factors but we will leave that to another
discussion.

On the STEM side, this gets even more filtered because even
fewer choose to pursue a degree in a STEM related fields. A study by the National Action Council for
Minorities in Engineering, Inc. on U.S. engineering degrees found that
African-Americans, American Indians, and Latinos account for 34 percent of the
total U.S. population (ages 18 to 24), but earn only 12 percent of all
undergraduate degrees in engineering. In fact, the share of engineering degrees
earned by these three groups declines at higher educational levels: 12 percent
bachelor's, 7 percent master's, and 3 percent doctorates. Meanwhile, women
account for nearly half—46 percent—of the U.S. labor force but account for just
10.8 percent of U.S. engineers. This is a big issue because in order to remain
competitive with the rest of the world we need to push for a progression of our
education system and with that STEM related courses.

Consequently, one may argue
that the shortage of engineers is due to the weak foundations that high
schoolers receive as part of their basic education package. And yes, in part
the government is responsible because of the lack of organization and the
current curriculums in place despite the recent efforts of the commander in
chief to include a higher load in STEM classes to prepare students in the near
future. But also part of the problem could come from a lack of access. Data
from the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights showed
African-American and Latino students are much less likely to have access to
Advanced Placement courses in STEM fields. Many students also say they don't
take AP courses due to a lack of confidence.

The lack of diversity (and
woman) in STEM jobs is evident but the complexity of the issue doesn’t end with
the government being the solely faulty entity. The ratio of minorities STEM
will not change unless we make a change from early stages. Perhaps there is a
racial component linked to it, African-American and Hispanic STEM workers
aren’t just lacking in the U.S., they also make up a relatively small portion
of the foreign-born students and professionals in STEM in the United States.
Currently, 63% of foreign-born STEM workers come from Asia, with most from
India or China. But why? Perhaps a lot has to do with the culture itself. As a
recent minority graduate in engineering I hope we make a change in the near
future.

Friday, October 23, 2015

The South African inventor and CEO of Tesla Motors and
SpaceX is unstoppable. Musk with degrees in Physics and a proven a
electromechanical engineer is doing big things. He got introduced to computer
programming at the age of 10 and at the age of 12 he sold his first code of a
video game he created called Blastar for $500. After dropping out of the
prestigious PhD physics program at Stanford he decides to go into the
developing and changing the world with innovative ideas. The first one was
called Zip2, a web software company providing business directories and maps to
media companies and local e-commerce merchants that was sold to Compaq $307
million dollars in cash where Elon received $22 million from the sale. He then
founded Paypal which was acquired by Ebay or US$1.5 billion in stock, of
which US$165 million was given to Musk. Last but not least he founded
SpaceX and Tesla motors, two companies that revolutionized the industry in
their respective markets despite the initial years of losses on their financial
statements.

Here are some of the stuff he is currently leading:

SpaceX

SpaceX has an end goal: to take people to space as soon as
possible. With the recent funding cuts, government work and governmental
companies like NASA are contracting companies like Space X and boy this work is
lucrative. In May of 2005 SpaceX got a contract with NASA of over a billion
dollar for Responsive Small Spacelift (RSS) launch services by the United States Air Force. Regardless of the
money Mr. Musk has a different end goal. In an interview he stated he wanted to
reduce the cost of space travel by a factor of 10, with a project to colonize
mars in the near future. Musk reveals that he wishes to establish a Mars colony
by 2040, with a population of 80,000 and that we need to start looking at other
planets outside of Earth as a method of survival:

"An asteroid or a super
volcano could destroy us, and we face risks the dinosaurs never saw: an
engineered virus, inadvertent creation of a micro black hole, catastrophic
global warming or some as-yet-unknown technology could spell the end of us.
Humankind evolved over millions of years, but in the last sixty years atomic
weaponry created the potential to extinguish ourselves. Sooner or later, we
must expand life beyond this green and blue ball—or go extinct."

Tesla

They are the new thing, and everyone is talking about it. It
is evident that the market for Tesla is hot and they are trying to keep up with
the demand. According to Tesla’s website they are producing 550 cars per week
and they tend to sell every single car. In fact, when going to the website you
encounter a page that lets you reserve a car with a wait time of up to 6 months.
Not all has been success for Tesla motors, currently they are still fighting
against automobile dealers in multiple states because of the direct-to-customer
approach that Tesla uses. In my opinion, the fact that automobile companies are
lobbying against Tesla also serves as a propaganda to make the brand a little
more exclusive and desirable. Tesla may lose sales in 5 states but gains
recognition worldwide. It also gains recognition in the sense that it keeps
bringing new things to the table. A clear example, is the tesla Model X, the
first SUV that tesla produces. With ample seating up to 7 adults and an
estimated mileage of 250 miles per charge model X promises to change the
market. The price for the Model X has not been officially released yet but
researchers of the market estimate it at nearly 100K. Many argue that Tesla’s
are the future but that they are overpriced and only the wealthiest can get a
hold of them. But wait, Musk is already working on that issue.

The Tesla Model 3 usually starts at $35,000 before any
government incentives and deliveries are expected to begin early 2017.
According to the website www.plugincars.comas of March 2015, the Tesla Model X is basically
sold out. New orders submitted in spring 2015 will be fulfilled in “early
2016.” So, considering the lower price point, the number of hand-raisers for
the Model 3 could create a long backlog—a nice problem for Tesla to have.

SolarCity

SolarCity is currently the second largest provider of solar
panels in the United States. Although Elon Musk is the only chairman (not so
bad for being the CEO of multiple companies) he made a commitment to make this
smooth process for whoever wants to try the project. According to Lyndon and
Peter Rive the current CEO’s their goal is to make this process super easy and
accessible. You first get a free solar consultation where you will get a quote
and study to determine whether or not your location will surplus the initial
cost in 20 years. If so, you can go ahead and sign your agreement for the next
20 years where the guarantee no hidden fees along the way. Next, a solar panel
system designer along with a surveyor come to your household and gather more
information of the geolocation of the property. After, they start the
installation where they claim to finish in one day (quite impressive), and they
also take care of your permits and inspections. It seems like a solid plan in
place, as long you have the right resources upfront.

Hyperloop

The need of a better way to mitigate traffic and
transportation is evident here in California, especially in Los Angeles, and
that’s where Elon Musk came with the idea of implementing a high speed
transportation system driven by air compression and a specialized type of
induction motor. In his plan he claims a hypothetical subsonic air travel
machine that stretches approximately 350 miles (560 km) from Sylmar (a northern district of Los
Angeles) to Hayward (east of San Francisco) and would
theoretically allow commuters to travel between the cities in 35 minutes or
less. This is huge impact in the way we see transportation since this is
already faster than actual airplanes. This technology is barely being developed
and is currently in the being discussed from a economic perspective. According
to his proposal this will cost around 6 billion dollars. More concerns were
raised (like getting sick at high velocities, unpleasant rides etc) when the
proposal came up but his information and theory of the Hyperloop remains
unproven. Currently no plan of development has been issued.

Elonk Musk with 44 years has done remarkable changes to
society, and I am sure there will be more to come.