FEAR or FAITH? FRIGHT or FLIGHT?Welcome Eagles to the New Crusade!Will thou help defend the Fortress of Faith?BOOKMARK us & check in DAILY for the latest Endtimes News!SPREAD WORD TO YOUR FRIENDS & FAMILY!

"And I beheld, and heard the voice of one eagle flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice: Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth....[Apocalypse (Revelation) 8:13]

Thursday, November 17, 2016

HOW ZIONISTS TRICKED USA INTO WORLD WAR I

Hoping to draw the
United States into the "Great War" (World War I),
British Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill had, in May, 1915, engineered the sinking of The Lusitania.
As the munitions-laden
liner approached British waters, the British Mad Dog
called off the ship's escorts so that a German
U-boat could torpedo the sitting duck. About 1,200 passengers and crew
were
killed, including about 100 Americans. Needless to
say, the doomed passengers knew nothing of the dangerously explosive
contraband
that was being secretly transported from New York
to London.

But it was not yet time for America to enter the brutal war. Not only did President Woodrow
Wilson have a re-election to win in 1916, but certain other pieces had yet to be put in place -- one being the internal
overthrow of the "anti-Semitic" Russian Tsar (allied with Britain & France), and the other, well, we
will get to that shortly.

Contrary
to what most
people think, the May 1915 sinking of Lusitania did
not bring America into the war -- although the memory of the event was
indeed resurrected for propaganda purposes two
years later.

As
1915 drew to a close, the war, though now at a
stalement, found the aggressor Allied powers of Britain, France
and
Russia clearly on “the short end of the stick” in
their unprovoked war against the Central Powers of
Germany, Austria-Hungary and Ottoman Turkey. Not
one square inch of German territory had been captured and the
disastrous,
8-month-long French-English campaign in the
Turkish Dardanelles (Gallipoli Campaign / April 1915 – January
1916) was ending in a humiliating retreat, soon to be followed by a political upheaval in Britain.

Though
it cost him
his job and earned him the scorn of both his peers
and the British public, Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill's
inexplicable
folly in Turkey actually had a hidden motive -- as
we shall soon see.

SYKES-PICOT

Given
the disadvantageous position in which the
Allies now found themselves in on all fronts, one would think they
would
be licking their wounds and reassessing the
standing peace offer that Germany and friends had on the table
at all
times. Instead, the British and French, with the
assent of Russia, negotiated a secret agreement for dividing up
the very same Turkish Empire that had just handed
them a humiliating and historical ass-kicking that is still
celebrated
in Turkey, and remembered in Britain. The
negotiation of the Sykes-Picot treaty occurred between
November 1915 and March 1916, and was signed in May, 1916.

How
strange for the losing parties
in a war to be secretly re-drawing the map
of the winning party? What made Britain & France believe, after
the
bloody hiding they had just suffered in
the Dardanelles, that they could succeed the next time around in Turkey
--
to say nothing of the impossibility of defeating
mighty Germany?! Wouldn’t it make more sense to talk about border
rewrites after the war is won – a seemingly impossible scenario by this time.

The
Sykes-Picot Agreement amounted to counting chickens before they were
hatched. What made Sir Mark
Sykes (UK) and Francois Georges-Picot (FRA) believe
that they were going to win a war that they were losing? Did they have
psychic powers? -- Or did they already know something, in early 1916, that the American people did not?

.

ZIONIST-BRITISH ALLIANCE

Unless
Germany could be knocked out – which would allow for a massive
southward diversion of Allied troops to
attack Turkey again – the Allies had little chance of conquering the
Turkish Empire. Surely, they must have
known this. And so, what can possibly explain this supreme, arrogant,
and
seemingly delusional confidence in total victory on
the part of the Allies? In order to answer that question, we
must understand the nature of other secret
agreements that had previously taken place.

The land of Palestine (95% Arab populated / 5% Jewish)
was under Turkish rule. But the Zionists of Europe
wanted it for a “Jewish State”. The war was their
opportunity to have Britain grab it for them!
Zionism was first discussed at a British Cabinet level in November, 1914
--
just four days after Britain's declaration of war
on the Ottoman Empire.

In a discussion after the meeting with Zionist Herbert Samuel, Chancellor of the Exchequer Lloyd George assured him that "he
was very keen to see a Jewish state established in Palestine." Samuel then outlined his Zionist
aspirations for the establishment in Palestine of a Jewish state, and of the
importance of its geographical position to the British Empire.

Samuel's
memoirs state:

"I
mentioned that two things would be
essential—that the state should be neutralized, since it could not be
large
enough to defend itself, and that the free
access of Christian pilgrims should be guaranteed. ... I also said it
would be a great advantage if the
remainder of Syria were annexed by France, as it would be far better
for the state
to have a European power as neighbour than
the Turk."

Prime
Minister H. H. Asquithlater announced in a speech that the dismemberment
of the Ottoman Empire had become a war aim:

"It is the Ottoman Government, and not we who have rung the death knell of Ottoman dominion not only
in Europe but in Asia."

From
the early days of the war, Prime
Minister Asquith (Image 1) and future Prime
Minister George (2) discussed the possibility of a Zionist state in
Turkish-ruled
Palestine with Atheistic Jewish liberal politician
Herbert Samuel (3).

THE AMERICAN
CONNECTION

In
January 1915, Samuel submitted a Zionist memorandum entitled The Future of Palestine
to the Cabinet after discussions with Chaim Weizmann and
Lloyd George. In February 1915, Samuel, wrote:

"...it
might be possible to neutralize the country under
international guarantee
... and to vest the government of the country in
some kind of Council to be established by the Jews."

Now,
what does all of this 1914-1915 back-room dirty dealing between the
British and
the Zionists have to do with the strange
confidence in ultimate victory manifested in the Sykes-Picot
agreement
of 1916, you ask? It’s not as if the scattered
Jews of Europe had any military power to contribute to the
fight against Germany, Austria-Hungary and Turkey.
Ah, but the Zionists did have military power to contribute to
the Allied cause – from across the sea. What the British could not achieve with the Lusitania
disaster, the Zionists could get done easily!

Installed through
the Jewish-rigged 3-Party election of 1912, the American President Woodrow Wilson was owned by the Zionists
of America. Giants such as Bernard Baruch, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, Samuel Untermeyer, and Supreme Court
Justice Louis Brandeis controlled Wilson just as surely as men like Haim Saban and George
Soros control Obongo and Hillary today. The power of these dominant men, as well as the influence of the
Jewish-owned New York Times and the Piranha Press, could, at the
“push of a button”, bring the young super-power into the war at anytime – and the British knew
it all along.

Benjamin Freedman, the "Jewish defector"
who had once served as assistant to Bernard Baruch, confirms:

*

"The
Zionists in London had sent
cables to the United States, to Justice
Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting
from
England what we want. Now you go to work on
President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's
how
the United States got into the war. We had no
more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have
to be on the moon tonight instead of in this
room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war.
We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we
were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the
world could obtain Palestine. That is
something that the people of the United States have never been
told. They
never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the
Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed
our part of the agreement. Let's have
something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your
bargain and
give us Palestine after you win the war." They
didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten
years. So they started to work out a receipt.
The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very
cryptic
language so that the world at large wouldn't
know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour
Declaration.

The
Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's
promise to pay the Zionists what they had
agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into
the
war. (here)

***

Thank you Mr. Freedman!

The Balfour Declaration, written by Lord Balfour,
addressed to Lord Walter Rothschild:

"His
Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine
of a
national home for the Jewish people, and will use
their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it
being clearly understood that nothing shall be
done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing
non-Jewish
communities in Palestine, or the rights and
political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

The Zionists are gearing up for to celebrate
the 100th Anniversary of the Balfour Scam in 2017. (here)

PUPPET WILSON SCAMS AMERICA

After the
1916 re-election of Wilson, anti-German propaganda exploded across the American (Jewish) press, culminating with
a Declaration of War in April, 1917 (just 18 days after the Tsar had abdicated). Actual U.S. entry into the war,
however, did not occur until Spring, 1918, a few months after the Balfour deal had been finally put to paper
and announced. You see, the Jews were no fools. Back-room verbal deals weren't enough. They wanted something tangible,
in writing, addressed to a Rothschild, before the now "at-war" Americans would actually begin firing.

The
1918
entry of the U.S. turned the tide against Germany
and Austria-Hungary, while freeing-up the European Allies to divert
forces
southward for the eventual Sykes-Picot
dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire, and the establishment of the
pro-Jewish "British
Mandate" over occupied Palestine.

Just 1 month after his re-inauguration,
the 'pacifist' Wilson switched gears!

Once
the British finally put the dirty
deal in writing (Balfour), "neutral" America
activated its forces in Europe. With the help of vicious atrocity
propaganda,
formerly pro-German America turned anti-German
overnight!

So
you see, the Wilsonian
lies that you were taught in high school history
about America entering World War I for the noble purpose of "making
the world safe for democracy" were all just
cooked-up bits of barf. The Allies knew all along that America was
destined
to enter the war on their side, once the right
deals were finalized with the Globo-Zionists bosses who engineered the
whole
tragedy.

The unfolding of history over the past 100 years makes it clear that Globalism (New World Order) and Zionism
were, by pre-meditated design, the big winners from World Wars I&
II. Without U.S. entry into the world
wars, there would never have been such a thing as
"the state of Israel" -- a project which was finally completed
in 1948, and has been causing new problems and new
wars of expansion ever since.

That's history folks, real
history,
"spread like butter," as the great World War II
historian David Irving would say. And the most sickening part if
this tragic historical drama is that it has yet to
fully play itself out.

1- "Come on man! Join me in dying for Wilson's war for a New World Order and a Jewish state in
Palestine!"

2- Dead American entangled in barbed wire. He
and 125,000 other "dough-boys" died, in part, for the future "state of Israel" and never even knew it.

3-
Red Star of David and the occult number '6' represented the
"6th Infantry" division of America's World War I
force. Why would the overwhelmingly Christian U.S. military use
such a symbol? When we consider that the 'Great
War' was actually fought on behalf of, Jewish Reds and Jewish Zionists, it all makes perfect sense.

TRADCATKNIGHT VIDEOS!

TCK Youtube Channel

TRADCATKNIGHT- TOP 3 CATHOLIC YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Archbishop Lefebvre

“This Second Vatican Council Reform, since it has issued from Liberalism and from Modernism, is entirely corrupt; it comes from heresy and results in heresy, even if all its acts are not formally heretical. It is thus impossible for any faithful Catholic who is aware of these things to adopt this Reform, or to submit to it in any way at all. To ensure our salvation, the only attitude of fidelity to the Church and to Catholic doctrine, is a categorical refusal to accept the Reform.”

ANNOUNCEMENTS

Archbishop Lefebvre

“And we have the precise conviction that this new rite of Mass expresses a new faith, a faith which is not ours, a faith which is not the Catholic Faith. This New Mass is a symbol, is an expression, is an image of a new faith, of a Modernist faith. ….Now it is evident that the new rite, if I may say so, supposes another conception of the Catholic religion-another religion.”

FOLLOW TRADCATKNIGHT ON TUMBLR!

TCK Facebook

FOLLOW TRADCATKNIGHT ON PINTEREST

Archbishop Lefebvre

That Conciliar Church is a schismatic Church, because it breaks with the Catholic Church that has always been. It has its new dogmas, its new priesthood, its new institutions, its new worship, all already condemned by the Church in many a document, official and definitive.... The Church that affirms such errors is at once schismatic and heretical. This Conciliar Church is, therefore, not Catholic. To whatever extent Pope, Bishops, priests, or faithful adhere to this new Church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church...

Fr. Hesse Summary on Vatican II

Vatican II = Heretical & Schismatic

Exposing Vatican II & New Mass, Fr. Villa

Archbishop Lefebvre

“Well, we are not of this religion. We do not accept this new religion. We are of the religion of all time; we are of the Catholic religion. We are not of this 'universal religion' as they call it today-this is not the Catholic religion any more. We are not of this Liberal, Modernist religion which has its own worship, its own priests, its own faith, its own catechisms, its own Bible, the 'ecumenical Bible'-these things we do not accept."

Traditional Quotes & Prayers

The Real 3rd Secret of Fatima

Inlcudes Vatican II and the soon Apostate Church..."...because Fatima is a very apocalyptic message. It says that no matter what happens there are going to be terrible wars, there are going to be diseases, whole nations are going to be wiped out, there are going to be 3 days darkness, there are going to be epidemics that will wipe out whole nations overnight, parts of the earth will be washed away at sea and violent tornadoes and storms. It's not a nice message at all." Fr Malachi Martin

SSPX Marian Corps Donations

Marian Corps-Australasia

Fr. Chazal

Fr. Girouard

Or send a cheque made out to Fr. Patrick Girouard at : P.O.Box 1543, Aldergrove, BC, V4W 2V1, Canada.

St. Marcel Initiative

Or, if you prefer, in the U.S., make your contribution by telephone, toll free: 855-4-S. Marcel (855.476.2723), or internationally, by sending your donation directly to donations@stmarcelinitiative.com via PayPal.

TCK TESTIMONIALS

Eric Gajewski, Founder of DefeatModernism(formerly known as Defeat the Heresies)

Resistance Forum

True Traditionalist Forum

Pope XII: “Suicide Of Altering the Faith In Her Liturgy…..”

"I am worried by the Blessed Virgin's messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the Church is a divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith, in Her liturgy, Her theology and Her soul. … I hear all around me innovators who wish to dismantle the Sacred Chapel, destroy the universal flame of the Church, reject Her ornaments and make Her feel remorse for Her historical past."A day will come when the civilized world will deny its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted. She will be tempted to believe that man has become God. In our churches, Christians will search in vain for the red lamp where God awaits them. Like Mary Magdalene, weeping before the empty tomb, they will ask, 'Where have they taken Him?'"

ALEXA RANK

Find The Rank Of Any Website

Current Crusaders Online Worldwide (RealTime)

St. Bernard:

Go forth confidently then, you knights, and repel the foes of the cross of Christ with a stalwart heart. Know that neither death nor life can separate you from the love of God which is in Jesus Christ, and in every peril repeat, "Whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's." What a glory to return in victory from such a battle! How blessed to die there as a martyr! Rejoice, brave athlete, if you live and conquer in the Lord; but glory and exult even more if you die and join your Lord. Life indeed is a fruitful thing and victory is glorious, but a holy death is more important than either. If they are blessed who die in the Lord, how much more are they who die for the Lord!

How secure, I say, is life when death is anticipated without fear; or rather when it is desired with feeling and embraced with reverence! How holy and secure this knighthood and how entirely free of the double risk run by those men who fight not for Christ! Whenever you go forth, O worldly warrior, you must fear lest the bodily death of your foe should mean your own spiritual death, or lest perhaps your body and soul together should be slain by him.

Indeed, danger or victory for a Christian depends on the dispositions of his heart and not on the fortunes of war. If he fights for a good reason, the issue of his fight can never be evil; and likewise the results can never be considered good if the reason were evil and the intentions perverse. If you happen to be killed while you are seeking only to kill another, you die a murderer. If you succeed, and by your will to overcome and to conquer you perchance kill a man, you live a murderer. Now it will not do to be a murderer, living or dead, victorious or vanquished. What an unhappy victory--to have conquered a man while yielding to vice, and to indulge in an empty glory at his fall when wrath and pride have gotten the better of you!

But what of those who kill neither in the heat of revenge nor in the swelling of pride, but simply in order to save themselves? Even this sort of victory I would not call good, since bodily death is really a lesser evil than spiritual death. The soul need not die when the body does. No, it is the soul which sins that shall die.

The knight of Christ, I say, may strike with confidence and die yet more confidently, for he serves Christ when he strikes, and serves himself when he falls. Neither does he bear the sword in vain, for he is God's minister, for the punishment of evildoers and for the praise of the good. If he kills an evildoer, he is not a mankiller, but, if I may so put it, a killer of evil. He is evidently the avenger of Christ towards evildoers and he is rightly considered a defender of Christians. Should he be killed himself, we know that he has not perished, but has come safely into port.

Once he finds himself in the thick of battle, this knight sets aside his previous gentleness, as if to say, "Do I not hate those who hate you, O Lord; am I not disgusted with your enemies?" These men at once fall violently upon the foe, regarding them as so many sheep. No matter how outnumbered they are, they never regard these as fierce barbarians or as awe-inspiring hordes. Nor do they presume on their own strength, but trust in the Lord of armies to grant them the victory.

.

.

Saint Athanasius

"May God console you! ... What saddens you ... is the fact that others have occupied the churches by violence, while during this time you are on the outside. It is a fact that they have the premises – but you have the Apostolic Faith. They can occupy our churches, but they are outside the true Faith. You remain outside the places of worship, but the Faith dwells within you. Let us consider: what is more important, the place or the Faith?The true Faith, obviously. Who has lost and who has won in the struggle – the one who keeps the premises or the one who keeps the Faith? True, the premises are good when the Apostolic Faith is preached there; they are holy if everything takes place there in a holy way ..."You are the ones who are happy; you who remain within the Church by your Faith, who hold firmly to the foundations of the Faith which has come down to you from Apostolic Tradition. And if an execrable jealousy has tried to shake it on a number of occasions, it has not succeeded. They are the ones who have broken away from it in the present crisis. No one, ever, will prevail against your Faith, beloved Brothers. And we believe that God will give us our churches back some day. "Thus, the more violently they try to occupy the places of worship, the more they separate themselves from the Church. They claim that they represent the Church; but in reality, they are the ones who are expelling themselves from it and going astray. Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ."