by
Thomas A. Droleskey

Although I had intended to write on Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis's support for "civil unions" as a "lesser of two evils" position against efforts in the Congress of the Argentine Nation to "legalize" "marriage" between persons engaged in perverse acts in violation of the binding precepts of the Sixth and Ninth Commandments, an outbreak of flu has felled the Droleskey trio pretty low at this time. It is the Feast of the Seven Sorrows of the Most Blessed Virgin Mary after all, and thus it is that the sickness occurs at a very propitious time as we week to give unto Christ the King through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary whatever merit might be earned as a result of inconveniences. Deo gratias! Much more time is needed to complete the "civil unions" article than is prudent for me to spend now.

Jorge Mario "Cardinal" Mario was not joking when he disparaged the so-called Anglican Ordinariate that had been established by the Antipope Emeritus, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, in Anglicanorum Coetibus, November 9, 2009, something that an Anglican layman, who dresses up in clerical garb and pretends to be a "bishop" with a mission to "serve" Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in the "Anglican Communion" in Argentina, noted shortly after Francis, The Talking Apostate's election by his brother apostates on Wednesday, March 13, 2013, Wednesday in the Fourth Week of Lent:

The new Pope has reportedly said the Church universal needs Anglicans and that the Ordinariate is "quite unnecessary".

In
a note released after the election of the first ever pontiff from Latin
America, the Anglican Bishop of Argentina and former Primate of the
Anglican Church of the Southern Cone, the Rt Revd Greg Venables said
Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio was "an inspired choice".

"Many are
asking me what is really like. He is much more of a Christian, Christ
centered and Spirit filled, than a mere churchman. He believes the Bible
as it is written.

"I have been with him on many occasions
and he always makes me sit next to him and invariably makes me take part
and often do what he as Cardinal should have done. He is consistently
humble and wise, outstandingly gifted yet a common man. He is no fool
and speaks out very quietly yet clearly when necessary."

Bp
Venables added that in a conversation with Cardinal Bergoglio, now Pope
Francis, the latter made it clear that he values the place of Anglicans
in the Church universal.

"He called me to have breakfast
with him one morning and told me very clearly that the Ordinariate was
quite unnecessary and that the Church needs us as Anglicans.

Yes, indeedy, boys and girls out there in cyberspace, most of whom like to access articles without giving any thought to, say, providing even five or ten dollars to support its continuation, Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis has expressed himself very clearly about "relations" with the schismatic and heretical Anglican sect, sending a message to the new layman posing as the Anglican "archbishop" of Canterbury, Justin Welby, upon his installation yesterday, March 21, 2013, the Feast of Saint Benedict, as the latest fake, phony, fraud to pose as a successor of Saint Augustine of Canterbury. Remember, of course, that the Canterbury Cathedral was stolen from the true Church by the murderous, lecherous King Henry VIII in 1534 after he had Parliament declare himself to be "supreme head of the Church in England."

It is no accident that the date of March 21 was chosen by the Anglican sect as is on that date in 1556 that hideous named Thomas Cranmer, the last Catholic Archbishop of Canterbury and the first Anglican to claim that position, was burned to death upon the orders of Queen Mary. This heretic, who had the blood of thousands upon thousands of Catholic martyrs in England and Ireland on his dirty hands, is considered to be a martyr by the Anglican sect. Sickening. Truly revolting.

Here is Bergoglio/Francis's first message to his spanking new partner in "ecumenical dialogue," Justin Welby (not to be confused with Marcus Welby, M.D., of course), who is a fellow socialist and believer in the One World Ecumenical Church.

To the Most Reverend and Right Honourable
Justin Welby
Archbishop of Canterbury

"May grace and peace be multiplied to you" (1
Pet 1:2b)

I thank you for the kind words contained in
your message to me at my election, and I wish in turn to offer
my greetings and best wishes on the occasion of your Enthronement at Canterbury Cathedral.

The pastoral ministry is a call to walk in
fidelity to the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. Please be
assured of my prayers as you take up your new responsibilities,
and I ask you to pray for me as I respond to the new call that
the Lord has addressed to me.

Justin Welby and his schismatic, heretical Anglican sect have no right to that glorious Catholic cathedral. No right whatsoever. Canterbury Cathedral is stolen property. It belongs to the Catholic Church.

Then again, of course, the church buildings, including the Basilica of Saint Peter, and the schools, hospitals, monasteries and convents and other institutions and property that belong to the Catholic Church have been seized by spiritual robber barons, each of whom does not possess the Catholic Faith in her Holy Integrity while saying and doing things that are proscribed by the Catholic Church. Most of these spiritual robber barons are neither priests or bishops. They are laymen just as surely as Justin Welby,

"Pastoral fidelity"?

"A call to work in fidelity to the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ"?

Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis, simply aping the party line taken by Giovanni Montini/Paul VI, Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II and Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, believes that heretics and schismatics some kind of "ministry" to discharge in the"Church of Christ" while supporting many grave evils (contraception, the surgical and chemical assassination of innocent preborn children under cover of the civil law as the exercise of a "duly informed conscience," perversity as an expression love "love" and a "commitment" in stable relationships, installation of women as Anglican presbyters and bishops, installation of men and women engaged in unrepentant acts of perversity) under cover of the civil and, of course, using liturgical books condemned as heretical by Pope Saint Pius V in Regnans in Excelsis, March 5, 1870, and declared to be utterly null and void of any sacramental validity by Pope Leo XIII, Apostolicae Curae, September 18, 1896, using a translation of Sacred Writ that is heretical and promoting one heresy after another.

Some ministry, huh?

Oh, what I am talking about?

Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis does many of the same things, and he is very "open" to those "religious leaders" who support grave moral evils and who keep an "open mind" on others, which "open mind" usually ends up being closed with an announcement that he is supporting the grave evil in question (see, for example, Abiding Biden And His Counsel). Justin Welby has such an "open mind" about so-called "gay marriage":

Peter Mullen– a cranky right winger in the Church of England– comments here. He thinks the new ABC is just the same old thing: a politically correct, well connected, left wing establishment type.

In other words, remembering that excellent show Yes Prime Minister, he is the perfect Church of England bishop: “A socialite who is also a socialist.”

He
will also combine all that with an Evangelical theological position
which seems conservative (“the Bible really is the Word of God”) while
adapting adroitly to the spirit of the age. (“After serious study of the
Bible I am firmly in favor of women bishops” and “On the question of
homosexual unions. We must continue to pray and discuss together,”) In
other words, George Carey with class or Rowan Williams still with the
fuzzy theology if not the fuzzy face. (New Top Lay Bishop of False Anglican Sect Is a Socialite Who is Also a Socialist.)

Let's get this straight. Believing that "the Bible really is the Word of God" makes one "conservative"?

We live in a world of mad people.

Mad.

Insane.

Crazy.

Irrational.

Each of these adjectives apply to Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis as he continues in only "Petrine Ministry" as the false Bishop Forme the ecumanaical madness of his predecessors by contending that Protestant and Orthodox clergymen have a valid "mission" to serve God as "ministers of the Gospel." This implies very clearly that one can believe in whatever he wants about the "Christian faith" as long as he holds to certain "non-negotiables," perhaps even what could be called an "irreducible minima" of articles contained in the Sacred Deposit of Faith.

Pope Pius XI has explained otherwise:

These pan-Christians who turn their minds to uniting the churches seem,
indeed, to pursue the noblest of ideas in promoting charity among all
Christians: nevertheless how does it happen that this charity tends to
injure faith? Everyone knows that John himself, the Apostle of
love, who seems to reveal in his Gospel the secrets of the Sacred Heart
of Jesus, and who never ceased to impress on the memories of his
followers the new commandment "Love one another," altogether forbade any
intercourse with those who professed a mutilated and corrupt version of
Christ's teaching: "If any man come to you and bring not this doctrine,
receive him not into the house nor say to him: God speed you." For
which reason, since charity is based on a complete and sincere faith,
the disciples of Christ must be united principally by the bond of one
faith. Who then can conceive a Christian Federation, the members of
which retain each his own opinions and private judgment, even in matters
which concern the object of faith, even though they be repugnant to the
opinions of the rest? And in what manner, We ask, can men who
follow contrary opinions, belong to one and the same Federation of the
faithful? For example, those who affirm, and those who deny that sacred
Tradition is a true fount of divine Revelation; those who hold that an
ecclesiastical hierarchy, made up of bishops, priests and ministers, has
been divinely constituted, and those who assert that it has been
brought in little by little in accordance with the conditions of the
time; those who adore Christ really present in the Most Holy Eucharist
through that marvelous conversion of the bread and wine, which is called
transubstantiation, and those who affirm that Christ is present only by
faith or by the signification and virtue of the Sacrament; those who in
the Eucharist recognize the nature both of a sacrament and of a
sacrifice, and those who say that it is nothing more than the memorial
or commemoration of the Lord's Supper; those who believe it to be good
and useful to invoke by prayer the Saints reigning with Christ,
especially Mary the Mother of God, and to venerate their images, and
those who urge that such a veneration is not to be made use of, for it
is contrary to the honor due to Jesus Christ, "the one mediator of God
and men." How so great a variety of opinions can make the way clear to
effect the unity of the Church We know not; that unity can only arise
from one teaching authority, one law of belief and one faith of
Christians. But We do know that from this it is an easy step to the
neglect of religion or indifferentism and to modernism, as they call it.
Those, who are unhappily infected with these errors, hold that dogmatic
truth is not absolute but relative, that is, it agrees with the varying
necessities of time and place and with the varying tendencies of the
mind, since it is not contained in immutable revelation, but is capable
of being accommodated to human life. Besides this, in connection
with things which must be believed, it is nowise licit to use that
distinction which some have seen fit to introduce between those articles
of faith which are fundamental and those which are not fundamental, as
they say, as if the former are to be accepted by all, while the latter
may be left to the free assent of the faithful: for the supernatural
virtue of faith has a formal cause, namely the authority of God
revealing, and this is patient of no such distinction. For this
reason it is that all who are truly Christ's believe, for example, the
Conception of the Mother of God without stain of original sin with the
same faith as they believe the mystery of the August Trinity, and the
Incarnation of our Lord just as they do the infallible teaching
authority of the Roman Pontiff, according to the sense in which it was
defined by the Ecumenical Council of the Vatican. Are these truths not
equally certain, or not equally to be believed, because the Church has
solemnly sanctioned and defined them, some in one age and some in
another, even in those times immediately before our own? Has not God
revealed them all? For the teaching authority of the Church, which in
the divine wisdom was constituted on earth in order that revealed
doctrines might remain intact for ever, and that they might be brought
with ease and security to the knowledge of men, and which is daily
exercised through the Roman Pontiff and the Bishops who are in communion
with him, has also the office of defining, when it sees fit, any truth
with solemn rites and decrees, whenever this is necessary either to
oppose the errors or the attacks of heretics, or more clearly and in
greater detail to stamp the minds of the faithful with the articles of
sacred doctrine which have been explained. But in the use of this
extraordinary teaching authority no newly invented matter is brought in,
nor is anything new added to the number of those truths which are at
least implicitly contained in the deposit of Revelation, divinely handed
down to the Church: only those which are made clear which perhaps may
still seem obscure to some, or that which some have previously called
into question is declared to be of faith. (Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos, January 6, 1928.)

There is no such thing as "fundamental" and "non-fundamental," "essential and non-essential" truths of the Holy Faith. It's all or nothing. It is called Catholicism, and each false religion, including every Protestant sect and the Orthodox churches, is founded upon one or more defections from the Holy Faith as It has been revealed by Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ to His Mystical Bride, Holy Mother Church, to be kept inviolate in all of Its immutable purity and integrity. There are no "ifs," "ands" or "buts" on this point.

Nothing is negotiable about the Catholic Faith, which is why the conciliarists themselves are outside of the true Church as they have shown themselves to be just as much in league with the devil as Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis's "partners" in ecumanaical "dialogue." Bergoglio/Francis has no true ministry in the Catholic Church. He thus shares quite a lot in common with Justin Welby.

Adding salt to the wound of Frank the Apostate's congratulatory letter, issued on March 18, 2013, to his brother non-bishop in Canterbury, the Occupy Vatican Movement announced yesterday, March 21, 2013, that he would stage the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service on the evening of Holy Thursday in prison for juveniles in Rome rather than at the Basilica of Saint John Lateran, which is the cathedral of a true pope in his capacity as the Bishop of Rome, or at the Basilica of Saint Peter:

Vatican City, 21 March 2013 (VIS) – On Holy Thursday, 28 March, the Holy Father Francis will celebrate the Chrism Mass in St. Peter's Basilica in the morning and then, at 5:30pm in the afternoon, will go to celebrate the Mass of the Lord's Supper at the Casal del Marmo youth detention centre instead of the Basilica of St. John Lateran, where it had been traditionally held in past years.

The Mass of the Lord's Supper is characterized by the announcement of the commandment of love and the gesture of washing the feet. In his ministry as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Cardinal Bergoglio used to celebrate the Mass in a prison or hospital or hospice for the poor and marginalized. With this celebration at Casal del Marmo, Pope Francis will continue his custom, which is characterized by its humble context.

The other Holy Week celebrations will be held according to tradition, as established in a notification by the Office of Liturgical Celebrations.

More fake, phony, sanctimoniously pious fraud from Francis The Ostensibly Pious as he does away with what little remains of the solemnity of Maundy Thursday in the counterfeit church in such a manner in such a manner so as maintain his own personal traditions. Yes, yes, yes, liturgical "simplicity." Ah, that is why the man is Francis The Jansenist, and it does take any reading of "'papal' tea leaves" to know that this is so. Bergoglio/Francis, the new public universal face of apostasy, is just the latest conciliar revolutionary to screaming at us: "We're Not Catholic." "You betcha" they're not Catholic, and they are not in the Catholic Church.

Although an entire article could be written on this last point in and of itself, that will have to wait until next week. Sleep beckons. It is time to put this madness aside.

All I have to say to those in the "recognize while resist" or they "recognize and we will ignore if you recognize us" crowd is that they should keep channeling the "Reverend" Jesse Jackson, Sr., and simply say to themselves "Keep hope alive! Keep hope alive!"

Such individuals are attempting to clothe the emperor and they are deceiving many others, perhaps starting with themselves, in the process as some of them rightly and roundly criticized me for doing the same thing in the 1990s with the "pope" of the Rosary, whose integrity he destroyed in 2002 with the issuance of the "Luminous Mysteries," the "pope" of Our Lady although he never prayed her Fatima Prayer in the Rosary, Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II. Antichrist is not going identify himself for us. He is simply going to do and to say things are are the opposite of what Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ did, said and taught. Anyone who thinks that the beliefs, words and actions of the conciliar "pontiffs," including Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis, are not those of Antichrist is not being honest with himself or others.

Oh, by the way, a figure of Antichrist cannot sit on the Throne of Saint Peter legitimately (see The Chair is Still Empty).

In the midst of the incredible apostasies taking place before our very eyes, we must, as always, have recourse to Our Lady as we pray as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit and as we keep her company in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and in our time in fervent prayer before her Divine Son's Real Presence in the Most Blessed Sacrament. She will help us to cleave only to true bishops and to true priests who make absolutely no concessions to the abominable apostasies and blasphemies and sacrileges of conciliarism or to the nonexistent legitimacy of its "popes" and "bishops" who offend God so boldly, so openly and so brazenly--and with the full support and admiring approval of most of the world's baptized Catholics.

While each person must come to recognize this for himself (it took me long enough to do so; I defended the indefensible for far too long!), we must nevertheless embrace the truth once we do come to recognize and accept it without caring for one moment what anyone else may think about us as we make reparation for our sins and those of the whole world as the consecrated slaves of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ through His Most Blessed Mother's Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart.

We can never grow accustomed to offenses given to God by the conciliar "popes" and their conciliar "bishops."

We must cleave to the Catholic Church, not to the counterfeit church of conciliarism, as we attempt to plant the seeds for the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary as the fruit of the fulfillment of her Fatima Message by a true pope with all of the world's true bishops.