Fructose Effect On Brain May Explain Link To Obesity

A new, preliminary imaging study that compares the effects of fructose and glucose on the brain has found differences that may explain
why diets high in fructose may be behind the obesity epidemic.

Upon examining brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of adult volunteers, first study author Kathleen A. Page of Yale University School of
Medicine in the US, and colleagues, found ingestion of glucose but not fructose reduced blood flow and brain activity in regions of the brain that
regulate appetite, and ingestion of glucose but not fructose, led to higher levels of hormones that produce feelings of fullness and
satiety.

They write about their findings in a paper published online in JAMA on 2 January.

Fructose in Diet

In the average western diet, fructose comes from two sources: as a natural compound in fruit, and as an added ingredient of processed
foods.

Food companies use fructose because it is sweeter than glucose and helps to stabilize processed foods.

The main source of fructose in processed foods in the US is high fructose corn syrup, which is also used to improve the appearance of baked goods
because it produces a more consistent browning.

An author of that study, Stanley Ulijaszek, Director of the Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology at the University of Oxford, commented on
the difference between consumption of naturally occuring fructose in fruit and artificially introduced fructose as in processed foods. He
said:

"... fructose in an apple is probably released slowly because of the fibre within the apple and because the fructose is inside the cells of the apple."

The Study

In their background information, Page and colleagues write how evidence from animal studies suggests that "fructose possibly increases food-seeking behavior and increases food intake", and that "fructose ingestion produces smaller increases in circulating satiety hormones compared
with glucose ingestion". But it was not clear how the brain regions that lie behind such changes are affected in humans.

So, for this preliminary investigation into what neurophysiological factors might explain potential links between fructose consumption and weight
gain, they recruited 20 healthy, normal weight adults who underwent two sessions of MRI so the researchers could examine changes in blood flow in certain
parts of the brain.

The researchers were mainly interested in changes in hypothalamic regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) after glucose or fructose
ingestion.

The two sessions of MRI were several weeks apart. The scans were taken before and after ingestion of glucose or fructose.

The Results

The results showed a significantly greater reduction in hypothalamic CBF after ingestion of glucose compared with ingestion of
fructose.

"Glucose but not fructose ingestion reduced the activation of the hypothalamus, insula, and striatum - brain regions that regulate appetite,
motivation, and reward processing; glucose ingestion also increased functional connections between the hypothalamic-striatal network and
increased satiety," write the researchers.

Senior author Robert Sherwin, a professor of medicine at Yale, said in a telephone interview reported by Bloomberg that the results suggest the brain appears to
respond differently to glucose than to fructose.

Glucose is a fuel that the body needs. When there isn't enough, it activates cells to get the body to eat more glucose. When the body's levels of
glucose rise again, the brain turns those cells off.

What this study appears to show is that fructose does not have this effect: it doesn't turn the cells off.

"If you don't turn off the areas of the brain that are driving you to eat, you have a tendency to eat more than you would," says
Sherwin.

He and his colleagues also note that:

"The disparate responses to fructose were associated with reduced systemic levels of the satiety-signaling hormone insulin and were not likely
attributable to an inability of fructose to cross the blood-brain barrier into the hypothalamus or to a lack of hypothalamic expression of genes
necessary for fructose metabolism."

They conclude:

"In a series of exploratory analyses, consumption of fructose compared with glucose resulted in a distinct pattern of regional CBF and a smaller
increase in systemic glucose, insulin, and glucagon-like polypeptide 1 levels."

Expert Comments

In an accompanying editorial, Jonathan Q. Purnell and Damien A. Fair of Oregon Health & Science University, say the study supports the idea that
when fructose enters the human brain, it changes the neurobiological pathways that control appetite in a way that makes you want to eat
more.

They suggest the study adds to the mounting evidence, from "epidemiologic, metabolic feeding, and animal studies", that show:

"... advances in food processing and economic forces leading to increased intake of added sugar and accompanying fructose in U.S. society are
indeed extending the supersizing concept to the population's collective waistlines".

Purnell suggests people should cook more meals at home and limit their intake of processed foods containing fructose and high-fructose corn
syrup.

He also advises drinking less sugar-sweetened beverages. You don't have to cut them out altogether, but just control how much and how often
you drink them, he says in an interview reported by the Associated Press.

Recommended related news

Comments(2)

Thanks for publishing part of the real truth about the contribution fructose has made to obesity. It has been disheartening to discover how many researchers are receiving funding from companies producing food and drink with high amounts of fructose. Everytime I see the Walgreens advertisement for 3-12 packs for $11, I pray for greater integrity and responsibility on the part of those producing health damaging foods and drink.

This article is on point but if had to omit one thing it'd be the final word on sugar sweetened beverages, "You don't have to cut them out altogether, but just control how much and how often you drink them"

If this is a reference to soda this blanket statement is wrong. Soda is nothing but empty calories with a high fructose content, no one in north america has the "discretionary calorie allowance" to accommodate this overload according to the Center for Obesity Assessment. Diet soda not much better, arguably worse according to some studies

If this is a reference to juice it's closer to the truth, okay in moderation. The negative effect of fructose in fruit is offset by the fiber and comparatively low amount (when juicing ever notice how many oranges it takes to make a full glass?). I know bodybuilders who won't drink juice as part of a "cutting phase" to reduce fat and retain lean body mass.

Heck even skim milk with 12 grams of sugar should be taken in moderation if not eliminated from a healthy diet. I get my calcium from other sources.

2018 Healthline Media UK Ltd. All rights reserved. MNT is the registered trade mark of Healthline Media. Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a healthcare professional.