The
recent release of my previous column titled Rubio
Can Lock the Election for Obama resulted in numerous reader emails
that demonstrate a continuing confusion over the indisputable definition
and application of the term Natural Born Citizen. This follow up column
is written to remove all confusion from the topic, once and for all.

Sadly,
most of the people concerned with this topic believe they each know
the truth, even though they do not agree on what the truth is. Most
opinions are based upon second source or third hand information, most
of it motivated by political agenda.

My
objective is to establish through first source evidence the true meaning
of the term Natural Born Citizen as used by our Founders in Article
II of the Constitution, and spread the truth, no matter who it helps
or harms in the political arena. I have written on this subject extensively
and my only loyalty here is to the truth, no matter who it serves.

The
true definition of Natural Born Citizen

Simply
stated, a Natural Born Citizen is a second (or more) generation citizen
by birth right. None of the Founding Fathers were Natural Born Citizen
as they all became first generation citizens the moment they created
our nation. As a result, they had to exclude themselves from the NBC
requirement, even though most of them were born on soil (aka Native
Citizen), or none of them could have held the office of President.

The
term Natural Born Citizen was borrowed from Vattel's treaties The Law
of Nations, based upon the unalienable rules of Natural Law. Most people
understand and agree on this. Then, they begin cherry-picking their
facts from there, in all cases, based upon their individual political
agendas rather than a careful and complete study of the facts.

I
direct you to four sections in particular...

The
Law of Nations - Book 1 - Chapter 19 - Sections 212, 213, 214 and
215 - The true definition of NBC is given in these sections.

§
212. Citizens and natives (the section most people are familiar
with) READ IN ENTIRETY PAYING CLOSE ATTENTION TO SECTIONS I HAVE HIGHLIGHTED.

"The
citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society
by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate
in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those
born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society
cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of
the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their
fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed
to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation;
and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering
into society, reserves to his children the right of
becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore
that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their
tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to
the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they
owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in
order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of
a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner,
it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."

212
- Defines Natural Born Citizen as the natural offspring of a Citizen
Father. Vattel explains this three times in this section. Just as all
birthrights follow the blood of the father, so does natural rights of
citizenship. This debunks the theory that "both parents" must
be legal citizens at the time of birth of any offspring. Only the Father
confers Natural Born Citizenship.

§
213. Inhabitants (Refers to situations like Rubio's)

"The
inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners,
who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound to the
society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state
while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because
it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the
rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or
custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitants are those who have received
the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens
of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating
in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their
fathers; and, as the state has given to these the right of
perpetual residence, their right passes to their posterity."

213
addresses "citizen" and "inhabitants" - not Natural
Born Citizens defined in 212. Rubio falls into this category as he was
born in the U.S. - however, his parents (specifically his father) were
legal citizens of Cuba at the time of Marco's birth. Due to our 14th
Amendment based upon this section from Vattel, Marco became an inhabitant
at birth, and an "anchor baby citizen" via our current immigration
and naturalization laws. But because his Father was a legal citizen
of Cuba, his father conferred natural citizenship rights to Cuba upon
Marco's birth. It is on this basis that Marco Rubio is NOT a Natural
Born Citizen of the United States.

§
214. Naturalization (58) (confirms everything I just told you
about Rubio)

"A
nation, or the sovereign who represents it, may grant to a foreigner
the quality of citizen, by admitting him into the body of the
political society. This is called naturalization. There are
some states in which the sovereign cannot grant to a foreigner all the
rights of citizens, — for example, that of holding public offices
— and where, consequently, he has the power of granting only an
imperfect naturalization. It is here a regulation of the fundamental
law, which limits the power of the prince. In other states,
as in England and Poland, the prince cannot naturalize a single person,
without the concurrence of the nation, represented by its deputies.
Finally, there are states, as, for instance, England, where the single
circumstance of being born in the country naturalizes
the children of a foreigner."

215
answers the question of soil, or Native Born versus Natural Born

§
215. Children of citizens born in a foreign country (NO born
on soil requirement)

"It
is asked whether the children born of citizens in a foreign country
are citizens? The laws have decided this question in several countries,
and their regulations must be followed. (59) By the law of
nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers, and
enter into all their rights (§ 212); the place of birth produces
no change in this particular, and cannot, of itself, furnish any reason
for taking from a child what nature has given him; I say
"of itself," for, civil or political laws may, for particular
reasons, ordain otherwise. But I suppose that the father has
not entirely quitted his country in order to settle elsewhere.
If he has fixed his abode in a foreign country, he is become a member
of another society, at least as a perpetual inhabitant; and his children
will be members of it also."

This
pertains to John McCain, who was born in Panama due to his father’s
military deployment. As Vattel explains in section 215, where a person
is born cannot take away the Natural Born Birthright that passes via
Natural Law from Father to Son. Because John McCain's Father was indeed
a well-known legal citizen of the United States at the time of John's
birth, no matter where the birth took place, Natural Born Citizenship
passed from John's Father to John at birth. John McCain is a Natural
Born Citizen of the United States, no matter what else people think
about John McCain.

In
this regard, the United States Senate got it exactly right in their
99-0 Sen.
Res. 511 clearing John McCain to pursue the office of President
in 2008. Using the exact same definition used to clear John McCain,
Barack Hussein Obama and Marco Rubio would fail the test. The fact that
the U.S. Senate is on record getting it right demonstrates that the
entire U.S. Senate is complicit in the fraudulent seating of Barack
Hussein Obama in the people’s White House. It also proves it was
a premeditated crime…

NOTE:
This also relates to Mitt Romney - “I say "of itself,"
for, civil or political laws may, for particular reasons, ordain otherwise.
But I suppose that the father has not entirely quitted his country
in order to settle elsewhere. If he has fixed his abode in a foreign
country, he is become a member of another society, at least as a perpetual
inhabitant; and his children will be members of it also." –
Mitt Romney’s Father may have held dual citizenship as a
result of being born in Mexico, the natural son of a U.S. Citizen
Father. This could disqualify Mitt’s Father from holding the
offices of President and Vice President. However, Mitt was born in
the USA the natural son of the legal citizen Father, with no direct
divided loyalties. While Mitt’s Father may have been disqualified,
Mitt does not appear to be.

Just
in case there is any doubt concerning McCain, Vattel goes further on
the subject of the McCain circumstance in section 217

§
217. Children born in the armies of the state (John McCain)

"For
the same reasons also, children born out of the country, in the armies
of the state, or in the house of its minister at a foreign court,
are reputed born in the country; for a citizen who is absent
with his family, on the service of the state, but still dependent
on it, and subject to its jurisdiction, cannot be considered as having
quitted its territory."

One
does not quit citizenship rights when deployed abroad by our government.
In fact, even if a soldier deployed abroad sires a child, with a foreign
mother, that child is still a Natural Born Citizen of the USA as those
rights pass from Father to child at birth.

Are
you with me so far? Rubio is NOT a Natural Born Citizen of the USA,
John McCain is.....right? Barack Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen
no matter whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya.... right?

Now
for Romney....

According
to all available records on Romney, his Grandfather was a legal citizen
of the United States who became an "inhabitant" of Mexico
long before Mitt's birth. Mitt's father was born in Mexico, the natural
offspring of a legal US citizen living in Mexico. Remember from above
that soil changes nothing. According to all evidence available at present,
Mitt's father was born a Natural Born Citizen of the United States,
even though his parents were "inhabitants" of Mexico at the
time.

Mitt's
Father later returned to the United States and became Governor of Michigan,
something a non-citizen could not do. Mitt was born in Michigan, the
natural offspring of a legal citizen Father, making Mitt a Natural Born
Citizen of the United States at birth.

So,
McCain and Romney both pass the NBC test according to Vattel and The
Law of Nations. Rubio, Obama and others like Jindal DO NOT pass the
test. Every member of the U.S. Supreme Court knows the truth presented
in this column, as do every member of the U.S. Senate, most members
of the House and almost every judge in the country.

This
is why there is a concentrated effort to redefine the term to mean any
citizen, protecting all who remain involved in the greatest electoral
fraud ever perpetrated on any democratic society. The reason the Natural
Born requirement must be eliminated is it is not possible to stand up
a Global
Government in the United States so long as only Natural Born Citizens
can lead our government. That’s why our Founders placed the requirement
there – and that’s why people are hell-bent to remove it.

Before
you spread any more false information regarding the subject, I
welcome any challenge you want to raise to any of the information
provided here. If it is truth you seek, you now have the truth. If you
seek something else, the truth will not serve that agenda.

Subscribe
to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter
Your E-Mail Address:

One
final time – If the natural birth Father is a legal U.S.
Citizen at the time of the child’s birth, the child is a Natural
Born Citizen of the United States. If the natural birth Father is not
a legal U.S. Citizen at the time of the child’s birth, the child
is NOT a Natural Born Citizen. End of story!

Last,
if Marco Rubio truly wants to earn the title of An American Son,
he should immediately pronounce himself “ineligible” for
the offices of President and Vice President and explain why, which would
immediately turn all focus upon the current Fraud-in-Chief, Barack Hussein
Obama, and secure the defeat of Obama’s international assault
on the United States of America. If Rubio does not do this immediately,
he is not what many Tea Party supporters had hoped…

JB Williams
is a business man, a husband, a father, and a writer. A no nonsense
commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy.
He is published nationwide and in many countries around the world. He
is also a Founder of Freedom Force USA and a staunch conservative actively
engaged in returning the power to the right people in America.

Sadly,
most of the people concerned with this topic believe they each know the
truth, even though they do not agree on what the truth is. Most opinions
are based upon second source or third hand information, most of it motivated
by political agenda.