I love the idea of the double slit experiment, but the one question keeps nagging at me is why, how, observation changes the results...it makes no sense...and I can understand why people would devote their life trying to understand it.

I also liked the examples of quantum mechanics in use by various organisms, its very interesting to think of things that we can scarcely imagine affecting organisms to that degree.

I dislike the the insinuation that something that cannot be fully explained is supernatural because I feel it cheapens the definition of supernatural. I believe that God is the metaphysical, the reason the physical exists and continues to exist, but I find it hard to believe that gravity will continue to be unexplainable forever.

I love the idea of the double slit experiment, but the one question keeps nagging at me is why, how, observation changes the results...it makes no sense...and I can understand why people would devote their life trying to understand it.

I also liked the examples of quantum mechanics in use by various organisms, its very interesting to think of things that we can scarcely imagine affecting organisms to that degree.

I dislike the the insinuation that something that cannot be fully explained is supernatural because I feel it cheapens the definition of supernatural. I believe that God is the metaphysical, the reason the physical exists and continues to exist, but I find it hard to believe that gravity will continue to be unexplainable forever.

I agree with your claims, I guess I should have worded it better. Currently gravity and how it fits within the universe is an absolute mystery and has been touted as the collapse of physics.

Here is some more interesting videos, this one is by the Dr Fred Alan Wolf who is the voice for Dr Quantum. In it he claims that in order for us to percieve the world we must first have the information of the world which will affect our perceptions.

"its only when you bring your mind into the picture that you begin to make pictures.."

Another from Dr Fred Alan Wolf about how our brains can percieve things occuring before they occur... similar to the double slit conclusion

Now the next step is to get the evolutionists to add all this into their theory lol

Wow! Thhey sure kept his a secret. A lot of food for thought. I remember reading about this phoenomina years ago in an aricle about artificial intelligence penned by Massachusttes Institue of Technology. The article talked about teaching people to fly by computer. At a specific point in the education of the would be pilot the, computer had to be truned off, and the student had to get in a plane and fly by the "seat of his pants." In other words a mental pheonomena called "intution" must (that's what Wolf is talking about) take over for a pilot to actually fly a plane.

Another example used was this; When a boxer is boxing, if he has to thin and choose choose which fist to punch or defend himself with he would always be knocked out. He asctually has to anticipate which fist to use before it happens. Another example is in baseball. The batter has to swing his bat before the baseball arrives at the bat. Go figure.

Maybe you can answer a question about "Einstein's relativity theory. It makes somewhat sense when it applies to outer space (the fabric example). But suppose we are deep within the earth and we fall--would gravity pull us towards the center of the earh instead of causing us to fall up toward the earth's surface (because of greater density above us). Is this a naive question? Am I missing something?

Wow! Thhey sure kept his a secret. A lot of food for thought. I remember reading about this phoenomina years ago in an aricle about artificial intelligence penned by Massachusttes Institue of Technology. The article talked about teaching people to fly by computer. At a specific point in the education of the would be pilot the, computer had to be truned off, and the student had to get in a plane and fly by the "seat of his pants." In other words a mental pheonomena called "intution" must (that's what Wolf is talking about) take over for a pilot to actually fly a plane.

Another example used was this; When a boxer is boxing, if he has to thin and choose choose which fist to punch or defend himself with he would always be knocked out. He asctually has to anticipate which fist to use before it happens. Another example is in baseball. The batter has to swing his bat before the baseball arrives at the bat. Go figure.

Maybe you can answer a question about "Einstein's relativity theory. It makes somewhat sense when it applies to outer space (the fabric example). But suppose we are deep within the earth and we fall--would gravity pull us towards the center of the earh instead of causing us to fall up toward the earth's surface (because of greater density above us). Is this a naive question? Am I missing something?

If we could live despite the temperature then we would get pulled towards the centre since the only time you won't get pulled towards the centre is at the centre The majority of the mass is always pulling towards the centre, (though the pull would be less since the difference is less

Yes I totally agree I think that there is much about this world that we do not fully comprehend

1- Observe phenomena2- Propose hypothesis for the cause of said phenomena3- Enact an experiment to test the hypothesis, altering conditions and measuring conclusions in order verify what was the effect4- Undertake additional experiments to verify the initial one- used to check other potential causes or problems associated with the initial experiment.

For example- I want to screen extracts for anti-cancer capability

I add the extract to cultures of cancer cells (made from the same batch), and measure the amount of cells survive the treatment. Different concentrations of the extract are used in order to get a concentration curve which will assist in knowing how effective the extract is as well as provide additional support for its effect if the curve relates to it logically- increased extract shows increased number of dead cancer cells; you know something is wrong when you increase the extract and there is more cancer cells surviving.

Additional testing after this would be on "normal" human cell lines, since any compound can technically be an "anti-cancer" agent it just has the additional effect of being an "anti-cell" agent too