So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitterHad his communications director resignFound out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearancebeen sued by a porn starhad his chief economic adviser resignhad a twitter spat with 'Alex' BladwinHeld a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRAHad a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.

Don't forget his chum who dumped his steel stocks right before the tariff announcement, and Jared's Qatari loans malarkey.

The claim that Trump had spoken with North Korea confounded foreign policy observers. “It was not clear whether Trump was describing a direct conversation or messages sent through diplomatic channels,” reported the Washington Post.

The answer turns out to be: neither. Trump was describing a conversation with South Korea. An official from the National Security Council tells Yonhap News Agency, a South Korean publication, that Trump “was referring to his March 1 phone call with South Korean President Moon Jae-in.” So Trump was close, geographically, but instead of describing a breakthrough exchange with the totalitarian enemy that is developing nukes and threatening to kill us, he was describing the democratic ally that has no nukes and is trying not to be killed.

Trump was right that it was a Korea, but he had the wrong one. There are so many Koreas these days, it is hard to keep track.

Can't wait to see the attempts to explain this away as some deliberate master-trolling episode.

Goes to show how low the Clintons and Obama, even Romney, figures on the USA public's scale of opinion of basic decency. Establishment politicians... together with the Bushes, Cruz, McCain, Pelosi and other lowlife.

So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitterHad his communications director resignFound out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearancebeen sued by a porn starhad his chief economic adviser resignhad a twitter spat with 'Alex' BladwinHeld a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRAHad a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.

A couple of those points are straight out of the Bernie Sanders play book, no love for those?

So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitterHad his communications director resignFound out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearancebeen sued by a porn starhad his chief economic adviser resignhad a twitter spat with 'Alex' BladwinHeld a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRAHad a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.

Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.

Yeah, any analysis I've read suggests the 'he didn't sign' argument is a loser. It's almost certainly designed to try and get some detail out in public through the court case which would then be outside of the NDA. And to give her more publcity so that she could just try and ignore the NDA and make more money than she'd pay for breaching it.

Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.

Yeah, any analysis I've read suggests the 'he didn't sign' argument is a loser. It's almost certainly designed to try and get some detail out in public through the court case which would then be outside of the NDA. And to give her more publcity so that she could just try and ignore the NDA and make more money than she'd pay for breaching it.

Not a Lawyer, but didn't Trumps lawyer say that he paid the money, & it was nothing to do with Trump.

So how does the fact that the contract was cast as being between, Trump & Pornstar, when the Lawyer has now gone on the record, as casting the contract as between Lawyer & Pornstar, effect the validity of the contract ?

It's all immaterial really; as Trump has always used lawsuits as a way of stifling comment; & used his deeper pockets to try & scare away challengers. When he & his lawyers actually faced competent appellants, they pissed their pants, & settled rather than face the prospect of sitting in court & having Donald have to Testify (See Trump University).

Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.

Good thread on it here

https://twitter.com/TheViewFromLL2/status/971484958089936896But who did she have the contract with? Trump signed nothing, so it's deniable enough for him. Seeing tweets that this is always how it was done in Hollywood. Wouldn't surprise me for him to deny it and hint that "maybe Cohen had done some bad stuff and was being blackmailed, I hear it happens". She can claim she never intended to sign a binding contract with Michael Cohen only Trump could prove that wrong.

Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.

An agreement was made, consideration provided and actions by the parties have followed demonstrating the agreement was in place

Seeing how the White House position is that Donald is neither aware of the payment or the agreement, his actions with regards to the NDA would appear to be null and void. For his actions to be taken as abiding by the NDA, he needs to admit he was aware of the NDA

Maybe this is 5D chess. Agree to a NDA but don’t sign it yourself and get your personal lawyer to pay a bit of pocket money to the other side, party B, for reasons best known to no one. Then when party B realise you haven’t signed the NDA, thereby releasing party B from any obligation to abide by non-disclosure, you can safely stand back and say nothing to do with me. But then that allows party B to talk about the very thing you didnt want to acknowledge happened in the first place.

Maybe this is 5D chess. Agree to a NDA but don’t sign it yourself and get your personal lawyer to pay a bit of pocket money to the other side, party B, for reasons best known to no one. Then when party B realise you haven’t signed the NDA, thereby releasing party B from any obligation to abide by non-disclosure, you can safely stand back and say nothing to do with me. But then that allows party B to talk about the very thing you didnt want to acknowledge happened in the first place.

So much winning

So who gives a fok ? Any evidence that anybody thought he was a strict Calvinist, before they voted for him ? No biblical injunction against using prostitutes, btw, so The Don was just a magnanimous consumer.. now targeted by an ill-spirited harpy jealous of his success....

So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitterHad his communications director resignFound out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearancebeen sued by a porn starhad his chief economic adviser resignhad a twitter spat with 'Alex' BladwinHeld a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRAHad a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.

Who cares bro.

The majority of people that have bothered to comment on this thread I would imagine

So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitterHad his communications director resignFound out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearancebeen sued by a porn starhad his chief economic adviser resignhad a twitter spat with 'Alex' BladwinHeld a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRAHad a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.

A couple of those points are straight out of the Bernie Sanders play book, no love for those?

The tariff thing is a campaign promise - so you can see why HE did it.

If Bernie had flip flopped on gun control and back down to the NRA there definitely would have been backlash from his supporters

Maybe this is 5D chess. Agree to a NDA but don’t sign it yourself and get your personal lawyer to pay a bit of pocket money to the other side, party B, for reasons best known to no one. Then when party B realise you haven’t signed the NDA, thereby releasing party B from any obligation to abide by non-disclosure, you can safely stand back and say nothing to do with me. But then that allows party B to talk about the very thing you didnt want to acknowledge happened in the first place.

So much winning

So who gives a fok ? Any evidence that anybody thought he was a strict Calvinist, before they voted for him ? No biblical injunction against using prostitutes, btw, so The Don was just a magnanimous consumer.. now targeted by an ill-spirited harpy jealous of his success....

She isn’t a prostitute and she clearly isn’t I’ll-spirited about the affair, she’s using the publicity exactly like he has in the past, to gain notoriety and make a buck.

She’s a truthful version of Trump, she doesn’t lie about what she is and doesn’t pretend to be something else.

It’s strange how his behaviour towards women was a big fat lie apparently and yet all these little truths are coming out and painting a matching pattern of behaviour.

Clearly you feel it’s okay for men to treat women that way.

What happens when Stormy releases the pissing video and people discover the orange hue is actually from his golden shower habit?

Maybe this is 5D chess. Agree to a NDA but don’t sign it yourself and get your personal lawyer to pay a bit of pocket money to the other side, party B, for reasons best known to no one. Then when party B realise you haven’t signed the NDA, thereby releasing party B from any obligation to abide by non-disclosure, you can safely stand back and say nothing to do with me. But then that allows party B to talk about the very thing you didnt want to acknowledge happened in the first place.

So much winning

So who gives a fok ? Any evidence that anybody thought he was a strict Calvinist, before they voted for him ? No biblical injunction against using prostitutes, btw, so The Don was just a magnanimous consumer.. now targeted by an ill-spirited harpy jealous of his success....

No Biblical injunction against adultery?

The extent to which a Christian would overturn the moral code of his holy book, purely to defend a lying egotist is extraordinary.

It even says that you should worship no gods above God, yet your slavish devotion to Trump has surely crossed over to outright worship.

Is Trump the false prophet of Revelations? Have you thrown your lot in with Satan, now?

So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitterHad his communications director resignFound out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearancebeen sued by a porn starhad his chief economic adviser resignhad a twitter spat with 'Alex' BladwinHeld a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRAHad a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.

A couple of those points are straight out of the Bernie Sanders play book, no love for those?

The tariff thing is a campaign promise - so you can see why HE did it.

If Bernie had flip flopped on gun control and back down to the NRA there definitely would have been backlash from his supporters

Maybe this is 5D chess. Agree to a NDA but don’t sign it yourself and get your personal lawyer to pay a bit of pocket money to the other side, party B, for reasons best known to no one. Then when party B realise you haven’t signed the NDA, thereby releasing party B from any obligation to abide by non-disclosure, you can safely stand back and say nothing to do with me. But then that allows party B to talk about the very thing you didnt want to acknowledge happened in the first place.

So much winning

So who gives a fok ? Any evidence that anybody thought he was a strict Calvinist, before they voted for him ? No biblical injunction against using prostitutes, btw, so The Don was just a magnanimous consumer.. now targeted by an ill-spirited harpy jealous of his success....

No Biblical injunction against adultery?

The extent to which a Christian would overturn the moral code of his holy book, purely to defend a lying egotist is extraordinary.

It even says that you should worship no gods above God, yet your slavish devotion to Trump has surely crossed over to outright worship.

Is Trump the false prophet of Revelations? Have you thrown your lot in with Satan, now?