that debate was biased to Hillary. they all like to say about how vulgar Mr. Trump is, but that lamp thrower Hillary curses like a sayler is private according to the seceret service book. The things she said! cursing out secret service agents and her huband the president! It would curdle your hair!

As a Trup supporter I must say that I think Hillaru did have a slight edge in as the winner, but only because Lester Holt had her answer the Pertinent questions first and that put her on the offensive and Trump on the defencive.

I cannot help but ask do the republicans want to lose these elections? Why do they allow these biased NBC moderators like Holt and Crowley to be in charge with ridiculous personal attacks on Trump that are hardly the most critical matters of the day, and of course not do the same towards Hillary? Plus his facts on the economy were so slanted and selective, plus his comment about cops shooting blacks was heavy propaganda. Why did he not ask about how scared black people are to go out in the streets or send their kids to school? Why is that not the issuE?

Then Hillary brings up his personal comments towards women, what options does he have but to defend or explain that?

Trump could have brought up countless quotes from insiders how cruel and nasty Hillary was to her secret service men or body guards or hired help, but he did not.

Trump could have spoken of her wild eyed videos, her incapacity to even stand up on her own, her B.S. explanation for a 9 month coughing jag being pneumonia but he did not.

The media is totally in bed with the democrats and consequently this nation is way too focused on how Trump is being defensive than they are on what exactly was said last night about the most important national issues. They keep saying Trump does not deal in specifics ---- but Hillary does??? She is going to heal relations between blacks and cops and instill trust just by saying it? She is going to give free college education by saying it? She did not dare speak of the 20 trillion dollar debt as though that has no bearing.

Hillary is a democrat and liberal. Whether she is a criminal or a liar or witch does matter nearly as much as how badly liberal policies have ruined this nation and put us at risk to terrorists and the unimaginable trade deficit with China and other countries. Plus, morally and spiritually, this nation is in bed with the evil one. I do not care who wins, this nation will still end up the loser.

You're right about the ENEMEDIA, of course, but Mr.Trump should have known that his having to face such tactics was inevitable.

However, he's hardly alone in that regard. MOST politicians including the two Bushes are hardly silver-tongued orators or witty conversationalists.

Mr. Trump is a man of ACTIIN not of WORDS. Madame Clinton is NOTHING-BUT WORDS –– all carefully rehearsed and hired by decades of ceaseless braying in public arenas. Her complete lack of charm and believablility SHOULD have made i impossible for even to be considered as a nominee for any office higher than Country Prothonotary in a hick state, but perversity seems to prevail in America politics these days, and for a very long time before.

I agree with your moderate view of the proceedings. The ever-hateful Hillary DID appear better prepared, more polished, and definitely more aggressive than Mr. Trump, whose primary goal seemed to be to bely his image as a coarse, ill-mannered blowhard sedulously cultivated by the Left and the ENEMEDIA, who are, of course, one and the same.

I have always admired Mr. Holt's dignified, well-mannered style and his beautiful voice. I realize now, however, that the leftist bias in this event was one of OMISSION. Mr. Holt's questions were clearly calculated to do as much as possible to avoid embarrassing Her Heinous, and he did pretty much the opposite the opposite with Mr. Trump.

The approach of the moderator was almost embarrassingly lopsided. NEVERTHELESS, Mr. Trump SHOULD have been able to thwart the Leftist Agenda by inserting questions and factual assertions of his own that might have thrown the flint-hearted Hillary off balance. He had many good opportunities to do so, and he failed to take advantage of dos of them.

Mr. Trump's biggest flaw is his apparent compulsion to spend too much time DEFENDING himself against any and all charges no matter how trivial and obviously designed to discredit and embarrass him.

No matter what anyone says about the debate, including the expectations expressed by the media pundits and partisan organizations, it was pretty much Trump being Trump, interrupting, challenging, and dissembling; and Clinton being Clinton using progressive rhetoric, jabbing where appropriate, and using fact and figures to demonstrate her knowledge.Did anyone learn anything new? No! Did anything change? No!Hillary demonstrated physical stamina – but so did the great actor Yul Brenner in his last performance of the “King and I,” and immediately offstage was given oxygen and led away in a wheelchair. Hillary Clinton’s health issues still remain unexplored. Donald Trump continuously drank water during the debate whereas Hillary Clinton avoided any appearance of weakness.The greatest stalemate was Trump being challenged about his tax returns, and responded by challenging Clinton to produced her deleted emails.Funny, Trump attacked Hillary on her temperament while clearly demonstrating an aggressive demeanor.Hillary Clinton ended the debate with a sexist attack on Trump and Trump did not fire back with anything about her husband being a sexual predator and protecting him by attacking women viciously.Donald Trump was visibly unprepared for tonight's debate and it showed in terms of missed opportunities to attack Clinton as well as being unable to artfully sidestep issue landmines which Clinton threw in his path. Typical Trump -- believing he is "smart enough" to simply "wing it." Some of the missed opportunities: Benghazi, Clinton Foundation, Pay-for-Play, Cybersecurity and securing her own email server, and Muslim immigration.Nobody won the debate, but Americans lost – having to put up with these two seriously flawed candidates. Both spent more time talking about themselves and defending their actions rather than presenting a vision for America. Also, Trump was the ONLY one who walked through the "spin room" and spoke with reporters rather than simply putting surrogates out to tell your story.Where Trump failed: Trump did not counter the birther charges by asking why President Obama's team spent millions in legal fees fending off any challenge that would have allowed a court-appointed grandmaster to examine the original documents and report back to the court. Including documents related to foreign travel and possible foreign scholarships. Likewise, he did not mention that Hillary Clinton had a history of personal and political scandals and apparently has been given a pass by law enforcement and the mainstream media. Where Hillary failed: Clinton could have asked Trump if he would release his tax returns if the IRS granted him immunity.The bias Moderator Lester Holt did not include some very pertinent questions that would have favored Donald Trump. Question that everyone was waiting for but never asked. But he did seem to ask Trump some zingers!

This is an EXCELLENT review, Ms Pinkbottom. It is comprehensive and well phrased. THANK YOU.

I do have one suggestion: If you would please DOUBLE SPACE between your paragraphs when you copy and paste from Word into the blogger format, it would greatly enhance the "readability" of these lengthy statements, and therefore encourage more to read your thoughtful, highly intelligent observations.

I hope you don't mind, but I have copied your review, and intended to edit it for visual clarity and share it elsewhere giving you full credit of course.

Thanks again. Your type of intelligent commentary is exactly the kind of thing we long for and hope to see more often.

I was jamming with my bluegrass buddies last night, so I didn't see it.

Trump wins by not losing--Apparently he appeared presidential to a lot of people who had a different impression of him. If that is true, he wins and gains in the polls.

Everybody knows who Hillary is: An old battleship, sails tattered, hull pocked with the scars of a thousand battles, rusting at the waterline, outsize stern sagging from the weight of so many scandals... but somehow she stays afloat, probably by some satanic power...

Trump is going to learn from this performance, and I'm wondering if he's showing us the loose cannon stuff was just a circus barker act to draw a crowd...

The most horrific ship to sail the seas. We had the Titanic, but now we have the Hildabeest as the SS Satanic, sailing an infinite sea of eternal fire, Satan's foul breath filling her tattered sails as she blasts away at all that is true, right and just.

The SS Satanic drops anchor on far-flung exotic ports, disgorging that pirate Slick Willy to smooth talk the tribal chiefs as he rapes their young wimmin!

Do any of you remember Romney debating Obama when the then moderator Crowley disputed something Romney said as true? She never made a peep against Obama! Sound familia?

Well it happened again with Lester Holt. Lester, on more than one occasion, challenged Trump with his truthiness.

Then you have the queen up there denying such things as supporting NAFTA as the gold standard, which she did, and then hearing crickets from Lester Holt. Same old BS just different election.Nothing on Benghazi, Nothing on emails, Nothing on Clinton Foundation! How come?? Where were the tough questions to Hillary? And why did Holt spend an enormous amount of time on the “Birther” issue when Trump came out not long ago and said he dropped it.!

Nothing about Hillary's flip flop on TPP or her gold standard remark either. You can't see the bias because you're and idiot. You are a leftist due to your mental handicap and intolerance. Holt didn't even try to make it look like he was leveling the playing field, it was very obvious. Why Republicans still allow these Corrupt Liberals to moderate these debates is a mystery to me.

Do we need any more proof that these debates are rigged from top to bottom, one thing both Bernie Sanders and Trump seem to agree on? This crapola has been going on for decades. I don’t think that Trump lost any of his supporters but I don’t think that he convinced any of the undecided voters either. But then again, I also think that the people who are Undecided at this late date are basically clueless retards, much like the “Independents” . Donald needs to bring in more Blacks and Hispanics and Jews. which maybe a monumental task, but I think it’s doable

Thank you, Silver. Yes it is pertinent, but apparently her died-in-the-wool supporters would still vote for Her Heinous even if she were caught on camera stabbing an infant to death, then butchering it, seasoning it, stewing it with herbs, vegetables and wine, then eating it on camera. ;-)

D is for DEMOCRATS

D is also for DISGUSTING, DEPRESSING, DEMENTED, DYSFUNCTIONAL, DREARY and DEPRAVED.

Joan said: [I removed your comment, Joan, because you used the name of a blogging colleague in a pejorative manner. We have said many times that WE DO NOT PERMIT THAT HERE. However, your comment itself, was worth sharing, so I've reposted it without the offending moniker.]

"Bill and Hillary Clinton profess to have always been supporters of racial equality, but anecdotes published in a new book by his ex-lover claim otherwise.

"Bill was also sued several times by blacks and Hispanics for violations of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

So what does Trump do to expose that? He tweets the "law and order" dog whistle and touts "stop & frisk". In other words he lost any opportunity to gain some of the disaffected black vote.The man is a lousy campaigner.

Facts and figures are only as good as the character and disposition of those who bandy them about to use as "ammunition."

Please try to keep that in mind. The TRUTH always has, and always will, be found somewhere above and beyond the FACTS.

FACTS may be stubborn things, but are –– as I never tire of saying –– only the moral equivalent of INDIVIDUAL FRAGMENTS of stone and glass that belong to the large MOSAIC that accurately depicts the TRUTH.

OR could say Facts are like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. We can't know what picture will be until all the pieces have been put in place.

Lester Holt has been getting rightfully slammed for his obvious bias in last nights debate.There was one moment that was especially bad, and Rudy Giuliani is MAD AS HELL about it.When Trump mentioned how he is a fan of “Stop and Frisk” policies, Holt jumped in and INCORRECTLY STATED that “Stop and Frisk” was ruled unconstitutional.

Rudy said NOT SO FAST

Rudy Said: “Stop and frisk is perfectly constitutional…Maybe she doesn’t understand terry versus Ohio. it’s perfectly legal. What the court found is the way it was applied, they’re un-constitutional. there was 600,000 frisks. the success rate had been a lower percentage but the case went up on appeals and removed the judge from the case.”Rudy went on to compare Lester Holt to the infamous Candy Crowley. In case you don’t remember her, she was the slob who moderated the final Romney vs. Obama debate.

“and once again, Candy Crowley, stop and frisk going on right now. it’s approved by the united states supreme court. the decision is written by chief justice earl warren. but police officer had reasonable suspicion you’re committing a crime or about to commit a crime, you have right to stop you and search you…you find a gun, you can take the gun away from you. that is constitutional. if you do it too much, if you do it with some kind of racial profiling of which i was never accused and never did, what is called un-constitutional at the time.”

Lester Holt thought it was fine to question Trump on his Tax's, and the "Birther" issue but didn't say ONE word or ask any questions, about Hillary's Email scandal , the Benghazi issue, Hillary's Health issue, the Clinton Foundation, and anything else that might have embarrassed and offended Hillary.

BUT it was Mr. TRUMP'S job to COUNTER all those spurious, disingenuous "concerns" and aggressive assertions, whose SOLE PURPOSE is to embarrass and defame Mr. Trump, by asking pointed questions of his own about HRC's bizarre shady dealings that have somehow enabled her to amass a huge fortune for doing nothing but running her ugly, abrasive, thoroughly dishonest, power-hungry MOUTH.

When HE is badgered about releasing his TAX returns, he should immediately demand that HRC release the text to all those $250,000.00 speeches she gave to the Wall Street bansksters.

When snidely harassed about his "not paying income taxes," as though he had committed some sort of CRIME, or at the very least has been guilty of DERELICTION of DUTY as a "good citizen," Mr. Trump should have been FAR more EMPHATIC in stating that he has broken no laws in simply USING the existing laws to his best advantage –– a practice engaged in by ALL smart people.

And his approach to all this SHIT abut his having been a 'birther," Mr. Trump should have emphatically stated that IF Mr. OBAMA HAD NOT SPENT YEARS and HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of DOLLARS in LEGAL FEES TRYING to AVOID SHOWING HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE, there wouldnever a BEEN a "birther" issue a all.

Mentioning Mr. Obama's unwillingness to release his academic transcripts, and the fact of her "thesis" at Wellesley STILL being kept under lock and key wouldn't haves hurt Mr. Trump either.

Unfortunately, Donald Trump is guilty primarily of being MALADROIT in he art of thinking in his feet.

So you believe that Mrs. Clinton's polished, artfully-contrived well-rehearsed lines delivered in harsh, abrasive tones dripping with contempt were a "shambles?"

I was not particularly pleased with the results, but I thought the hour and half of uninterrupted, lightly moderated sparring went by very rapidly.

Usually these events are extremely tedious, because of intrusive attempts by blatantly biased moderators to micro-manage the event, thus stifling any semblance of spontaneity between the participants.

Sure, Mr. Holt went easy in HRC, and tried to interrupt Mr. Trump's semi-coherent ramblings too frequently, but in comparison to past events of this kind, Lester Holt seemed to me a model of good decorum and an an absolute ANGEL.

Maybe it failed to be what most of us had hoped for, but it was in no way a shambles.

Holt interrupted Trump a record 41 times, either to “fact-check” the Republican nominee, or to ask a follow-up question. Clinton was only interrupted seven times during the course of the 90-minute debate.

HOLT ASKED TRUMP 15 QUESTIONS, HILLARY ONLY 2!

Perhaps the WORST part of all this is HE DIDN’T ASK HILLARY A SINGLE QUESTION ABOUT HER E-MAILS, BENGHAZI, THE OBAMA BIRTHER ISSUE THAT SHE STARTED IN 2008, OR THE CORRUPT CLINTON FOUNDATION.

But he had NO problem grilling Trump on stupid issues like Obama’s birth certificate and the birther issue.

I'm very much afraid you are far beyond anything we could possibly offer, so please continue your shuffling off the coil. Terminal asininity is one of the deadliest of deadly diseases. I've never known anyone so afflicted to be cured.

It's this whole damned campaign, Mr. FreeThinke! This once-beautiful nation is coming apart like a fungus-riddled old sneaker. Social discourse has curdled and turned rancid. You Olde World charm and wonderfully-rich vocabulary and linguistic craftsmanship is a port in the storm. A true port in the storm for a troubled little emoticon! . /٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶

Why is Hillary "prepared to be president?" Everything she has EVER DONE in public life has either been a scandal or a disaster. I could go down the list but I know you don't care so what's the point?Still feeling ther Brrn?

Mr. Trump was remiss in not pressing this issue and demanding to know WHY Her Heinous had so many emails DESTROYED beyond any hope of reclamation. What the HELL is the goddam bitch HIDING?

If the public has a right to see Mr. Trump's TAX RETURNS about which I care nothing, because surely if he had done anything illegal he would have been carted off to JAIL by now, bug IF the pubic has a right to see hose tax returns, SURELY they also have a right to know WHAT HRC is HIDING?

Just as they had a right –– and a DUTY –– as good American citizens to see Obama's BIRTH CERTIFICATE< which he took great pains to keep hidden at great expense.

No matter what anyone says about the debate, including the expectations expressed by the media pundits and partisan organizations, it was pretty much Trump being Trump, interrupting, challenging, and dissembling; and Clinton being Clinton using progressive rhetoric, jabbing where appropriate, and using fact and figures to demonstrate her knowledge.Did anyone learn anything new? No! Did anything change? No!

Yes he exaggerates. Yes, he blusters. Yes his syntax is often garbled. Yes he repeats his stock phrases far too often, and yes he has been guilty of occasional misstatements, but to say that HE is dissembling when that is virtually ALL Her Heinous has EVER done is not only unfair,it is downright RISIBLE.

Mr. Trump's clumsy, unsophisticated use of the language works against him. Also, he is woefully lacking in the the type of wit necessary to engage effectively in repartee. HOWEVER, –– and I am not proud to have to report this ––, these very deficiencies may be the reason he has connected so well with the Common People who work hard for low pay at dead end jobs. Despite his vast wealth, Mr. Trump appears to be one of them.

For good or got ill he talks their language. Mrs. Clinton may be more experienced, better rehearsed, more articulate and sharper when going on the offensive, but she appears overly calculating, heavily-scripted, her voice remains harsh and grating, her demeanor unbearably smug and supercilious.

Despite the untold thousands undoubtedly spent on her clothes, hairstyle, makeup and years of cosmetic dentistry, she looks more like a cold-hearted bird of prey than anyone a sensitive person could bring himself to trust in a crisis.

And yes, I admit to being prejudiced against HRC.

I do wish Mr. Trump had made a stronger showing, but in these United States polished prose, academic excellence and quick wit rarely get the lion's share of adulation –– a fact of life I never ease to lament.

Even so, I still believe in Folk Wisdom and pray thats Sincerity as opposed to Sophistry may yet prevail. There's nothing to do, but wait and see.

PLEASE avid calling the targets of your derision "idiots." Leftists may be IMMORAL, AMORAL, CRIMINAL. IGNORANT, MISINFORMED, DEVIOUS, MANIPULATIVE, HOSILE to TRUTH, etc., but they should NO be called "idiots."

In truth most leftists are highly intelligent, but perverse in the way they use the brains.

Unfitunatgely, too many who identity themselves as "conservative," really are intellectually deficient, as the superfluity of witless, tasteless, syntactically-challenged, hate-filled derogatory remarks all over the blogosphere readily attest.

After gathering up Hillary’s ‘notes’ the “cleaner” he tucked them under his arm while staring at the NBC hack moderator, Lester Holt and the 2 met onstage and from the video it appears that Hillary’s goon wanted to hand Holt the papers, which most likely were all the questions and pre-planned answers to Holt’s questions.

The WHOLE story Here:http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/2016/09/27/hillarys-mystery-man/

Host Free Thinke approves of SF’s message:Thank you, Silver. Yes it is pertinent, but apparently her died-in-the-wool supporters would still vote for Her Heinous even if she were caught on camera stabbing an infant to death, then butchering it, seasoning it, stewing it with herbs, vegetables and wine, then eating it on camera. ;-)

D is for DEMOCRATS. D is also for DISGUSTING, DEPRESSING, DEMENTED, DYSFUNCTIONAL, DREARY and DEPRAV

I can only speak for myself, but I do not hate Mrs. Clinton. Our nation is now in a very bad place on every level: globally, economically, socially, and we now have a turd world banana republic government, thanks to the rats and cockroaches in both parties.

Hillary Clinton is merely the most proximate manifestation of all of this. She turned the State Department into a branch office of the Clinton Foundation. Bill gets millions in speaking fees from Russians; Hillary's State Department approves selling US uranium rights to Russians... and the progressive toadies in the Infotainment-Media Complex bleat about how Trump is a Russian secret agent...

It is clear Mrs. Clinton and her co-conspirators put in place a system of buffers, studied defensible ignorance, executive privilege and attorney-client privilege to deliberately set up a clandestine communications network to subvert federal government official records laws. They also deliberately used that system to exchange classified information.

They set all of this up at the beginning, with malice and aforethought. The FBI, with some prodding from Justice was helpless as a kitten against the legally-bullet proof Clinton Panzer Korps.

If that is the kind of government that makes you proud, you are a sick person.

orry to have deleted the comment you responded, Silver, but WE DO NOT PERMIT HOSTILE COMMENTATORS who come here –– not to question or properly correct mistaken impressions, which would be fine––, but only to VILIFY, CASTIGATE, CHASTISE, COUNSEL CONDEMN or attempt ANALYZE OUR MOTIVES in promoting our admittedly profound anti-Left bias.

I'm sorry –– and frankly shocked –– that you DON'T hate Hillary Clinton. I most emphatically do, because if ever there was a figure who deserved contempt and derision more in recent hisser, surely it is she.

She represents a dire THREAT to everything the Founders worked so hard and sacrificed so much to establish. Beside that she is a conceited, arrogant, desperately unattractive, perverse, devious, domineering CUNT who should have been slapped down and put inner place decades ago.

Notice the many misogynistic references to Hillary's physical appearance, for example, "...outsize stern sagging..." Apparently the commenter is fine with the Brazil-sized a$$ that Trump hauls around the campaign stump. One could almost colonize the adipose tissue that hangs around his maximus gluteus, but Hillary is fat and The Devil.

They demonize Hillary while ignoring Trump's serial lying and adulteries and cheating small business out of money owed, and promoting a fraudulent "university," --(these people tend to be observant Xtians, but are quite forgiving when a louche and conman like Trump has an "R" after his name.) If there are bigger hypocrites in this world, I've yet to discover who they are.

Notice the many leftwing sneering references to Trump's physical appearance, ... Apparently the Democrat commenter is fine with the Brazil-sized a$$ that Hillary hauls around the campaign stump. One could almost colonize the adipose tissue that hangs around her maximus gluteus, but Trump is fat and The Devil.

They demonize Trump as Hitler while ignoring Hillary's serial lying about dodging sniper fire, and destroying whole nations, promoting a fraudulent "Charitable Foundation" that only disburses 10% of what it takes in -- (these people pretend to be concerned for the poor and downtrodden of the world, but are quite forgiving when a louche and conman like Obama, Hillary or BJ Bill have a "D" after his name.)

They scream to the rest of us to revert to 1800's lifestyle because of GLOBAL WARMING!!! CLIMATE CHANGE!!! Yet they fly around in pollution spewing jets, live in compounds the size of large medieval city-states and travel in convoys of filthy SUV's manned by gun-wielding bodyguards while they screech about taking our guns away.

If there are bigger hypocrites than leftwing progressives in this world, I've yet to discover who they are.

This decidedly unwelcome remark was NOT posted here by Miss Shaw, whom I consider a personal friend, despite the vast difference in our politics. Normally, I would delete such malevolent nonsense, but since Mr. Dick did such a good job of countering the unworthy, unwelcome allegations, I felt obliged to let it stand.

I DESPISE TROUBLEMAKERS, and that is EXACTLY defines the nature and character of the Counterfeiter posing as Miss Shaw.

You may not like what we have to say, –– or what you like to THINK we think around here ––, but we DO OUR BEST ALWAYS to PLAY it STRAIGHT, and demand that others do too.

She is unfit for the presidency, and if she were an ordinary civil servant or Army Sergeant (like Chelsea Manning) she and her cohort of con-conspirators, consiglieri, bagmen and buffers would all be in prison.

That's how our government rolls, folks. If you're an ordinary schlub who gets on the wrong side of the power elites, they throw 500 charges at you and force you to roll over and surrender.

Hillary and her criminal cronies didn't just violate that one federal statute; it today's America, a good prosecutor could find 50-100 statutes to charge them with, but she's Hillary Clinton, so they constructed a legal escape hatch for her.

Donald Trump now leads in polling in swing states Virginia, Florida and Iowa. All of the Iowa polls the last few weeks have shown Trump with a significant lead in the Hawkeye state. Trump is also up in Ohio, North Carolina and Pennsylvania. CHEW ON THAT YOU LEFTIST IDIOTS WHO COME HERE SPREADING YOUR BULL-SHIT.

Why the courtesy? “If the FBI wanted any other Americans’ laptops, they would just go get them—they wouldn’t get an immunity deal,” Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan told Politico. He’s right. The FBI merely had to seek a subpoena or search warrant. By offering immunity, the FBI exempted the laptops and their emails as potential evidence in a criminal case.

Beth Wilkinson, who represents Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson, says the immunity deals were designed to protect her clients against any related “classification” disputes. This is an admission that both women knew their unsecure laptops had been holding sensitive information for more than a year. Meanwhile, Mr. Comey also allowed Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson to serve as lawyers for Mrs. Clinton at her FBI interview—despite having been interviewed as witnesses and offered immunity.

Comey needs to resign, and President Obama needs to issue a full pardon and apology to General Petraeus.

Obama prosecuted a war hero but let a petty shyster who kept classified information on her laptop skip away smirking and laughing.

What we don't know--thanks to Hillary's well-oiled criminal enterprise cleaning up the crime scene so well--is what was in those e-mails. We don't know what China and Russia know about us. And lest not forget how she was so careful, she even wiped her server clean with a rag.Hillary Clinton is "extremely careless" and she is compromised by foreign intelligence. She is unfit for the presidency, and her combination of extreme carelessness and and total compromise by foreign enemies would put our nation in grave danger. She must not EVER become president.

THE LEFTIES WILL SAY AND DO ANYTHING TO GAIN A VOTE.. NO MATTER WHAT IT TAKES. yes, they will deny whatever they say when they get caught. Like saying "You mean wipe it with a cloth"And other idiotic things like that. This is a fact. Democrats support racism. They've used government to push policies that are racist for decades. Only recently have that totally dropped the facade and exposed themselves as the racists that they really are. They support Black Supremacists groups like Blacklivesmatter, which is simply the Klan with a Tan. Every time the media starts talking about another shooting, it's not like it's news, it's because they want to gin up support from minorities.

"Look at these white racist cops!!" They're trying to kill you.

Never mind the fact that the cop in the most recent shooting was black, facts don't matter to liars. Cops are authority figures, so they're white.What that means is being white means your the man and being a minority apparently means breaking the law. Thus, Democrats literally support breaking the law.Their presidential candidate has broken so many laws it's difficult to count them all. But we can ignore that. It's all just a vast Rightwing conspiracy. Vote for Hillary.Hillary had the audacity to call Trump supporters a Basket of Deplorables. For some strange reason, many of the most despicable people are voting Democrat, for very specific reasons. And how about Obama and his sheep calling republicans "Domestic Terrorists"! One of the primary reasons is because they hate and do not trust whites. Yet the Democratic ticket is two white people. But hold on. Being white and a Democrat doesn't mean the same thing as just being white. And everyone assumes that all minorities vote Democrat. It's quite confusing.Basically, the Democrat Party is nothing but a jumbled up mess, and the result of their leadership is division and violence.

Scum sucking snd Gullibility is not only alive and well in America it has apparently reached new heights. The Clintons and their surrogates are really working fast and furious to lie , and cheat, and do whatever it takes to made themselves winners.

Trump may still win... I've said for months, he might. And then people that 8 years ago denigrated candidate Obama for lack of experience and for years have said "character matters' will have the president their hypocritical amigos desired. A President with no experience and no personal character.But who really knows he still may be a better choice than having a liar as our president. Although I'm a liberal, I just can't bring myself to vote for Hillsry. I just don't trust her

You are a COUNTERFEIT Dave Miller, but you do sound like his ever equivocating wanting to proceed his good guy mage self, so I'll let this remain. Besides, I basically agree with the comment. We DON'T know what Mr. Trump will do if elected, but whatever it might be, it CAN'T be any worse than what we'd be bound to get with Her Heinous.

A review of FBI Director James Comey’s professional history and relationships shows that the Obama cabinet leader — now under fire for his handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton — is deeply entrenched in the big-money cronyism culture of Washington, D.C. His personal and professional relationships — all undisclosed as he announced the Bureau would not prosecute Clinton — reinforce bipartisan concerns that he may have politicized the criminal probe.

Full story @ FBI director received millions from Clinton Foundation,his brother's law firm does Clinton's taxes

I am a former 3rd grade teacher. And I would like to express ehat I witnessed on the night of the presidential "debate". What I saw was a candidate so completely unprepared that her presence in that forum was downright insulting, both to Mr. Trump and to the audience of millions. It was obvious from the start that Mrs. Clinton had made no effort to tell the truth, but to say whatever it took to win over some much needed votes. Teachers like myself can spot that sort of thing pretty easily. Lester Holt made the debate very easy for her in spite of her uninformed material. Mr. Trump was far more informed of the topics that the Moderator brought to the table. Also Mrs. Clinton may even have done a bit of cheating. I'd rather not have the leader of the United States lying her way in international summits or meetings with heads of state. Maybe it's just an educator's bias, but I much prefer the student who actually takes her classes seriously, prepares by completing her homework, and is able to participate intelligently in class discussion. Mrs. Clintons lack of ongormation, and snotty behavior during the program, and the utter disregard and disrespect for those who watched the "debate" last night was deplorable. Such behavior in my classrooms have warranted serious social skills instruction and behavior management implementation.

I'm no businessperson. I even cringed a bit selling Girl Scout cookies. But I thought about what I saw of you last night and imagined you in my world. I would not want you to be my child's teacher - sarcasm, lack of preparation, disrespect have no place in education. I would not want you to be my principal, for the very same reasons. You think you can just bluff your way through a faculty meeting? Hardly. You think you can just "wing it" as the year progresses and expect your school to achieve great scores in end-of-year standardized tests and produce exemplary students? Nope. I would not want to have you serve as president of our PTA. What kind of productive coalition could possibly come about as a result of your incredibly self-serving focus and bombastic behavior?

I look at Mrs Clinton like I have looked at my students. And my third grade students could teach you important lessons about things that seem foreign to you. Accountability. Responsibility. Apologizing when appropriate. Humility. Encouraging others to succeed. Building others up. Kindness. Cooperation. Admitting when you've made a mistake.My students learned those things in my classroom, Mrs Inton Somehow, those important life skills passed you by. I want students of all ages to be able to look upon their presidents' behavior, manner of speech, and embrace of scholarship and see excellent role models.No, Hillary is not a role model for my students. And if I were to give her a grade for last night's "debate", it would be an "F". You failed. All by yourself. You can pass the buck - you're pretty practiced at that - and blame whomever you wish to blame, such as the moderator, the microphone. But it is you, Hillary who failed yourself, who failed your campaign, and who failed to meet the high expectations of the forum known as The Presidential Debate.

You showed quite clearly that you are not fit to be the President of the United States."

Thank you Dragon Lady for the remarks I just read on your blog, slanted and distorted as they are.However Donsld Ttump was withing his rights to say the things that he did when Hillary slithered through the mud and made things personal. He didn't! And that was a big plus for him but if she continues he should hit back, and we all know that he has plenty of amp to hit her with. From her lies, to he cheating ways, to her criminal acts, her emails, and the fact that she was a woman abusing enabler. She seems to care more about Rosie O'Donuts than national security and more about how much tax Trump payed than obeying laws that would get anyone else in prison. She acted with immunity because ...well she had immunity. So chew on that!

Chew on this Dragon Lady! Miss Alicia Machado, the former Miss Universe, beauty that Hillary Clinton said Donald Trump allegedly called ‘Ms. Piggy’ and ‘Ms. Housekeeping,’ reacted somewhat flippantly Tuesday night when asked by CNN’s Anderson Cooper whether she had once participated in a murder and threatened to kill a judge.So chew on this! “There are reports that Trump surrogates tonight have been referencing and pointing to on CNN and elsewhere about an incident in 1998 in Venezuela, where you were accused of driving a getaway car from a murder scene. You were never charged with this,” Cooper said.

“The judge in the case also said you threatened to kill him after he indicted your boyfriend for the attempted murder. I just want to give you a chance to address these reports that the Trump surrogates are talking about,” Cooper continued.

The Righrwing bottom feeders are spamming this blog, using other people's names, copying other people's texts, and spreading irumors as though they were fact. They are the embodiment of Trump's deplorables. Liars, bullies, and exceptional numbskulls. ll led and encouraged by Free Thinke. The gang leader of a bunch of idiotic morons that feed on a lying halfwit who thinks he can become the president. What a joke.

Ester Holt tried everything in his vigor to knock Donald Trump off his sport in

last night’s debate. Some of the questions had definitely nothing to do with issues going through the American humans. As a substitute of specializing in policy, Holt felt it used to be extra fundamental to drill Trump about his tax returns and feedback about Obama’s birthplace that Trump made years ago.

If that wasn’t despicable adequate, Holt interrupted Trump 4 instances to reality determine him, however let Hillary lie on and on with out making a sound.

Even with all of the bias, and having to debate TWO dishonest liberals (Lester Holt and Hillary), Trump nonetheless managed to come back out forward of Hillary. In close to each debate ballot, even on liberal sites, Trump dominated Hillary. Listed here are only a few….

DRUDGE: Trump 82.1% Hillary 17.9%

THE HILL : Trump 58% Hillary 36%

CNBC: Trump 66% Hillary 34%

TIME: Trump 53% Hillary 47%

SLATE: Trump 55% Hillary 45%

FORTUNE: Trump 55% Hillary 48%

LAS VEGAS SUN: Trump 82% Hillary 18%

VARIETY: Trump 57% Hillary 43%

Correctly, CNN has the one poll showing that Hillary gained and the purpose why is as low down because it gets. The Clinton information community cooked the books and sampled 41% Democrats compared to just 26% Republicans.

Clearly the Fat Slob Trump lost the debate.He once again proved he knows nothing about most of the issues, especially on nuclear and NATO issues. He doesn't even understand treaty laws, which leads him to believe we could tear up all our treaties we have throughout the world. So how can he lead this country? Obama forgot more than this slob will ever know about world issues.His business mind tells him it's his goal and a good thing to pay NO taxes. I guess he thinks communal taxation is for us suckers only. He doesn't understand how America built the greatest country in the world. He knows how to use other people's money, then files bankruptcy when the numbers don't work out, leaving the folks who actually did the work, not getting paid and he calls that smart business. He uses any dirty trick including discrimination and thinks that's just fine, because the fine (if he gets caught) would be cheaper than paying a fair wage. I can't think of a more un-American business attitude. He dosn't even pay the "little people" that work for him! His financial plan is trickle down on steroids. A financial strategy that has been proven wrong multiple times. He invokes General MacArthur, but I guess he forgot MacArthur got fired. But then again, he loves that word "FIRED"!He still believes Obama is not American. A racist statement if ever there was one.He says he knows all Americans agree with him that Rosie O'Donnell is a fat pig, so he was correct in publicly calling her that, and the vulgar name calling he uses for other women.He claimed his mic wasn't working, but we could hear every sniffle.He claims Lester Holt was biased towards him and some see truth in that, because Mr. Holt never asked Clinton about Benghazi, or emails, or Libya, etc.. Maybe Trump will get his way when Chris Wallace is moderator.I've met many guys with over the top egos, but Trump wins the prize. He is a spoiled brat.A Trump presidency would be scary. It's scary enough to think he will get over 50 million votes.This is the kind of dolt the Republicans have given us. They deserve to lose.

Thank you for providing an eloquent example of the Leftist Mentality. If you ever looked in the mirror and saw yourself and your spurious talking points for what they're, you'd probably wind up slitting your throat.

Only in America can so much time, energy, and money be wasted finding the biggest losers of all time to be President! Disgusting and deplorable--both of them! I guess I'll be voting for Trump, but only because I don't think he actually killed anyone. I sure hope he spit in his hand before he shook that moron Holt's paw!

What happened to our constitution where everyone is accountable under the law? Our system is now so corrupt under this administration, that anything goes and is acceptable. It is unconscionable, unacceptable, morally wrong and we the people need to stand up to this tyranny, before Hillary lies herself into the presidency and destroys this great nation forever. We have the ability to determine the future of our country, if we stand united and vote for Trump in November. If we do not and Hillary wins, we will have no one to blame, but ourselves. God bless America.. They are so EVIL and Corrupt SOB's

Lester Holt, You call yourself a journalist? Lets be truthful Lester. You are nothing but a liar and cheat just like Hillary! You will get no respect from the American people. Who is your fact checkers? First graders? You can try to rig this election but Hillary will fail and you will go down with that sinking ship. All your lies did was help Trump get elected! You gave her the questions BEFORE the debate. We saw the flunky remove her cheat sheet after the debate. Do you think that the American people are stupid? You are the stupid one. You got caught and so did she. May you fail from this point on in every thing you touch. You are part of the problem in this country! And NBC supporting you will have very low ratings because you and the station you work for will no longer be watched! What a lying, cheating POS you are! NOTHING credible about you!

Attacking your opponent's character, or lack thereof might be fair game ! If it is then why the hell did Donald keep so damn quit? Why didn't he say what NEEDED to be said!Why didn't Trumps Speech writters ( if he has any) and if he doesn't have sny, then he better get some! Shades of Romney's 3rd debate when he didn't want to us Bengazhi because of "over- kill"! Over-kill? Well where is Romnry now?I'll give Donald some advice, snd I'll give it to him Free. My give to defeat Hillsry!1. Use Bengazhi !2. Mention the E-mails, snd harp on them all night! Ask why she didn't know that thy were Clasdifide if she SO damn cSmart!3. The Clinton Foundation, and the money that was meant for Haiti! And the money she took from Saudi Arabia. A Nation that don't let women drive, walk down the street alone, dress like they want to. Etc. etc, and etc.4. Talk about HER war against women, snd the way she went after the Women that her husband Raped.5. Monica Lewinski.6. ALL her lies, from The Sniper attack in Bosinia, to being named after Sir Hillary. To her Daughter jogging around the falling TwinTowers.7. Her calling the Secret Service men all those vile names. Fixing the Primaries against Bernie Sanders.and that would be a good start.

So you have a friend who is voting for Hillary and who is calling you snd Donsld Trump all kinds of names, what do you do? I get that question a lot. So here’s the thing…. if they are voting for Hillary because they believe in her policy positions a.k.a. a continuation of Obama’s failed America, well there’s not much you can do. I call those folks well-meaning morons. Leave them be. But if your Friends, peers, colleagues or even family members are trying to shame you for not voting for Hillary, well I’ve got some final thoughts you can deliver to them. Here we go…..

Start with a question why are you a Hillary supporter. Oh they’re ready for this question the media has prime them on it for decades. They will tell you she’s the most qualified. She has the most experience. I’m OK. Then ask them to outline some of Hillary’s achievements. They will stare at you blankly because that’s the thing with Hillary she so accomplished her supporters can’t name one damn thing she’s done and done well. Ask them to: outline some of Hillary’s achievementsAs the First lady, she stayed with a lowlife cheating husband for power and still couldn’t get support for Hillary Care. Oh and then senator. If they can name something she did well in the Senate I’ll be impressed. I mean what about 2008? She lost to a first term Senator/community organizer from Chicago. Ouch! Move to her reign as Secretary of State. Yeah, I wouldn’t want to talk about it much if I were a Hillary supporter either. Russia restart. Failure Benghazi. Well the H is always silent usually for 13 hours before and after the loss of 13 Americans. And yes the woman doesn’t know that C means classified and compromised National Security with a private server so she could get away with Foundation shadiness and give away any level of scrutiny. Well done!

Juanita Broaddrick, the woman who famously accused former President Bill Clinton of raping her during his 1978 gubernatorial campaign in Arkansas, took to Twitter Wednesday to address Chelsea Clinton’s downplaying of her father’s sexual misconduct.

“Here is my response to Chelsea Clinton’s statement about her father’s sexual misdeeds,” wroteMs. Broaddrick, a Donald Trump supporter who stepped back into the national spotlight recently after years of silence about the alleged rape.

“Chelsea you said you don’t remember a time in your life that your parents weren’t being attacked. There’s a very good reason for this — your parents are not good people,” she wrote in a series of tweets. “[Y]our father was, and probably still is, a sexual predator. Your mother has always lied and covered up for him.“I say again, ‘I was 35 when Bill Clinton Raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73. It never goes away,’” she wrote. “The truth is what has brought the attacks on your family and you are smart enough to know that by now.”

The comment just eradicated presented clear proof there are no depths to which the DIRTOCRATS won't stoop to gain more power.

HOWEVER, I would warn all who choose to dwell on Bill Clinton's unsavory past that doing so will neither help Mr. Trump nor harm Her Heinous.

The brilliant and ever-congenial Newt Gingrich tried to warn stupid Sean Hannity about this the past two nights. Hannity, whose skull is impenetrably thick, did not appear to understand and accept Mr. Gingrich's superior wisdom.

Sadly, Hillary, who as NOTHING of her own to tout, is doing her best to drag Mr. Trump int the gutter –– the place where both Hill and Bill seem most at home.

Hillary is ALL MOUTH and little else. What important buildings has she constructed? What scientific advances has she made? How many jobs has she created? How much success has she enjoyed battling bureaucracies and getting projects of lasting significance fulfilled?

Mr. Trump will not help himself or the Conservative Cause by engaging in a pissing contest with La Clinton. His best bet is to try constantly to confront her on the ISSUES, and to emphasize the differences between BIG GOVERNMENT and SMALL GOVERNMENT. And to remind her over and over of her FAILURES as Secretary of State and her MEAGER ACHIEVEMENTS as a a senator from New York –– and of all the LIES she's told, and all the promises she's broken.

D'Rats love to make much of trivialities. Mr. Trump should not ALLOW them to get away with it.

Gratuitous Displays of Extraneous Knowledge Offered Not To Shed Light Or Enhance the Discussion, But For The Primary Purpose Of Giving An Impression Of Superiority are obnoxiously SELF-AGGRANDIZING, and therefore, Subject to Removal at the Discretion of the Censor-in-Residence.