Abstract

The objective of the thesis is to focus on the conceptual issues of the debate that took place during the first 30 years of 900 between the Milanese noescolastic movement and Gentile’s Actualism.
The neo-Scholastic accusations -theologically based- of athesim agiainst Giovanni Gentile are brought back on a theoretical and speculative level and are teated as accusations of reductionism (monism) and contravention of the priniciple of non-contradiction.
Once the unsustainability of Gustavo Bontadini´s proposal has been justified the result will be the acquittal of the condemanation of Gentile (with will introduce a further proposed interpretation of the "neo" in his neo-Hegelism).