Its all just a big misunderstanding. Just another case of a john with a hearrt of gold who saw a working woman and decided to pull over and try to help. I think Eddie Murphy has a foundation that supports men who are wrongly accused of solicitation.

SordidEuphemism:Not that I buy the dad's story, but he should demand audio. No audio, no proof. No proof, no case.

No audio means undercover officer testimony, where the defendant is asking the jury to believe that he really just wanted to pray for the prostitute, while the officer is saying he asked for oral. I think there's still a case there somewhere.

I'm confused. If there's no video/audio, why are they going on just the officer's word? Did he give her money?Did he even arrive at the supposed destination?If he went to the motel expecting to meet up with her, or he gave her money for advance payment or something, then I say he was soliciting.If he just drove several blocks away and was arrested after only talking with her: Reasonable doubt.

You can't just have "he said, she said" in the court of law; that's what Judge Judy is for.

No, I really needed a sitter on short notice. I wasn't asking her to have sex with me, I just said I always wanted to bang the babysitter when I took her home. I figured she'd take the job to get a sale later!

boyvoyeur:Weeeeellllll, OOOOKKKKK. I guess I'll take your word on this one. Care to provide an explanation of your 8/15/2013 arrest for battery? Were you helping someone who stumbled?

http://florida.arrests.org/Arrests/Patrick_Williams_13544071/

Could have been with his wife's boyfriend for all we know. Without audio evidence from the police I don't necessarily at all believe their side over his. Some fight he was on the losing end of (legally) last August doesn't mean a thing.