Evolutionists have been obsessed for decades with crushing all opposition to their egregiously bad junk-science religion. They cannot debate the issues intelligently. They rely on indoctrination and censorship of all opposing viewpoints.

The cult of evolutionism proves that outside of their fields or affected by peer pressure, scientists are every bit as ignorant and dogmatic as they proclaim their critics to be.

creationists have been obsessed for decades with crushing all opposition to their egregiously bad junk-science religion. They cannot debate the issues intelligently. They rely on indoctrination and censorship of all opposing viewpoints.

The cult of creationism proves that in every field, creationists are every bit as ignorant and dogmatic as they proclaim their critics to be.

Speaking from personal experience, it's tiring to keep trying to teach creationists what evolution actually says only for them to 1) spout another strawman, 2) completely ignore you, 3) leave the conversation, or 4) respond with some BS and then block you from commenting. I used to think that people could be educated and that people legitimately wanted to learn. That is, until I discovered creationists. I naively tried to have a legitimate discussion and point out their errors thinking they would appreciate the help. But after a number of conversations with creationists (as well as UFO people, Bigfoot people, ghost people, ESP people, etc.) I'm the one who learned a hard lesson: most people don't care to be educated or discover anything. Most are perfectly happy to hold onto magical thinking just because it's easier. Not kidding, I've had a conversation where a person called the orbit of the planets a miracle.

Interesting how all they seem to do is try to poke holes in science and then say that somehow proves god. Say they're right, and all of science is wrong, how does that in any way prove that there is only one other choice, and what they're claiming is the only other choice is somehow correct?

Proving something wrong (not that they did) doesn't automatically prove that whatever crap they want to propose is somehow correct.