Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on 30th
of June, 2009. Newcomers look in to cuttingthroughthematrix.com
web site and on the front page you’ll see a lot of other sites I have up
there. These are really for emergencies but people should use them all
the time, as well, and spread the bandwidth. That way Yahoo can’t
complain so much that so many people are downloading via them. On that
front page you’ll see the other sites. [listed above]. There’s also
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu,
the European site and on there you’ll also have the same audios of all the
shows I’ve done over the last few years, for free, for download, plus you can
print up written transcripts of the talks I’ve given, written in the various
languages of Europe.

I
always start off, that’s why people skip over this part, by telling people that
you bring me to you. I don’t ask for money from any of the shows,
television or radio, I’ve been on. It’s
up to you to keep me going. The reason I am independent is that
there’s always a trade-off if you take on advertisers and promote them.
Because if certain topics come up, how do you answer a question truthfully if
it concerns products and so on? You can only do it if you’re going it
alone. The ads you hear on the show pay for the time on RBN. They
pay the technicians, the equipment, the costs, etc but I don’t get paid from
that. So, it’s up to you to keep me going, helping ME get along.
You can donate to me or buy the books or discs I have for sale on my
site. You can use PayPal. Outside the Americas there’s Western
Union. There’s also the MoneyGrams that are becoming more popular
too. Some people just send straight cash. That saves everyone the
deduction costs from the banks. It’s so amazing that so few folk think of
that these days. For those who get the discs passed around, you can write
to me [listed above].

Having
said that, you know I often wonder what to talk about at night. I
generally don’t plan anything. I scour the papers, see what’s being put
out for the people to read, I decide whether it’s worth reading or not or even
worth passing on. There’s a lot of stuff put out for the public to read
that will actually try and spin you off into their way of thinking.
The way you’re supposed to get your download. I try to dissect
them and find out what they really
mean. A lot of legalities are given to the public all the time. We
don’t realize that. Our silence after reading something or even hearing
‘a new deal’, for instance, or ‘a war on smoking’ or ‘a war on obesity’ or a
war on whatever, these are legal declarations… which become law if we
keep silent. That is how common law is established. Everyone agrees by their silence and it
becomes law. I’m going to talk more about this kind of law when I
come back after these messages.

I
am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Yesterday I mentioned
the Chicago Climate Exchange, this private organization that Gore and Mr.
Strong, Rockefeller, Rothschild, etc all took part in setting up. The
Rothschilds, you see, their bank will be dealing eventually in Switzerland with
all the trading of carbon taxes and so on. They deal with everything
else, so why not that as well? But it’s astonishing to see how things are
crept in to the public’s
consciousness and then it becomes, after a while, accepted fact or just a
routine, like it’s always been here, therefore, it’s law. That’s how it
creeps into being mandatory. Everything
starts voluntarily, generally, and then it becomes mandatory.

You
know, the driving licenses across most of the planet started off
voluntary. You did NOT have to have a driving license. But then the
goody two-shoes and the ones that thought they were getting up in
the world would boast about taking their driving course and they were authorized
now. They felt better than the ones who hadn’t. The same thing
happened with insurance for automobiles. You didn’t need it at
first. It was voluntary. Now, once they get something on the books,
it’s lawful, you see. What they always use is ‘democracy.’ Well,
75% have already gone this way, what’s wrong with you? Or they’ll say,
we’ll just make it mandatory now that most have joined it. That’s how
they use democracy, when it suits them. The rest of the time it’s just
dictatorial fascism, basically.

What
they want in this world of interdependence,
is also a world where you personally will pay your PERSONAL carbon taxes.
It’s going to be lead off by all the greenies, of course, and all those who’ve
fallen for all the nonsense and they’ll lead the charge to normalize it.
They’ll boast about it. Then there’ll be articles in all your local
newspapers, etc and photographs of the green families and all this stuff until
we’re so sick of it. Then the government will just make it lawful.
Well, 60% have gone this way so we’re just going to make it the same for
everyone. You see. THAT’S how it’s getting introduced.
Literally, it’s the greatest magic act on the planet… this invisible
nonsense. How can you weigh, see, or anything… invisible nonsense? You
can’t.

They’re
already starting it and have started it, in fact, in some airports in Canada
and no doubt in Britain too. Here’s a letter, an email from someone who’s
sent me this "Zerofootprint". This is the company, the PRIVATE,
CHARITABLE organization, mind you, that seems to have been given the
contract for this. It will belong to some foundation of Strong’s or
Rockefeller’s. I’ve no doubt whatsoever. It says,

“I saw this
while I was booking a ticket here in Canada. We can voluntarily, for the
moment, pay to offset our carbon footprint. (Alan: That’s your
personal one.) Mandatory soon, I imagine. They don’t miss a
beat. For only $25.60 plus general sales tax, (A: So you got a
sales tax ON TOP of your VOLUNTARY give-away tax, $25.60) I can
offset my carbon footprint, 1.6 tons of it, on a flight to Germany.” (A:
He sent me a link to the Zerofootprint. As it says, it’s a PRIVATE
organization, NOT for profit organization. It just sprung out of
nowhere. HA. HA. …like they all do, eh? But you can
always trace them back to the same foundations.)

"Zerofootprint"

Voluntary Personal Carbon Offset Tax

zerofootprint.net

A non profit
organization that’s emerged as the industry standard for offsets. (A:
It’s just emerged as the industry standard for offsets, just like that.
Just a click of the fingers and there it was.) Our mandate is not
only to help individuals and businesses become carbon neutral (A: You
know you’ve got to be DEAD not to give off carbon. You breathe it out, carbon
dioxide. You have to be dead. [laughs]) but to develop the
technology and communities that will help the world rise to the challenge of
Climate Change. (A: They’ve dropped Global Warming because it’s
gone the other way, you see. Now, climate change just means changes in
the weather. We used to always have the weatherman on television because
the weather was always changing… for those who can remember that.)

Air Canada
and Zerofootprint have joined efforts to give YOU the opportunity to minimize
the impact of your travel. Every flight you take releases carbon dioxide
into the atmosphere and contributes to climate change. (A: I
wonder if they’re going to tax all these jets that have been spraying us for 10
years and causing it to rain or to give us drought. It depends how they
feel, what mix they use. That won’t be mentioned because we’re living in
bogus land. We truly are. We’re in the biggest Disneyland ever
created.)

Here’s
an article here from Forbes Magazine. Here’s how they’re getting it
across to the sort of middle class yuppies. Remember that article I read
before too, studies at universities showed that the yuppies, the middle classes and the professional
classes, are the first to parrot political correctness, no matter what it is
because they want to be the same as their peer group. They don’t
want to be the odd man out. In other words, they have less individuality…
so they always jump at what’s politically correct at the time.

Your
Personal Climate Exchange

Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff, 10.30.08

Forbes Magazine dated November 24, 2008

You
could pledge to lower your home energy use and buy and sell credits for it.

The Chicago
Climate Exchange (A: That’s that private one, again, with Rothschild,
Rockefeller, Maurice Strong, Al Gore… putting it through, funneling it through
Al Gore’s own company and then off to the Rothschilds.) is an unusual
free market experiment in which companies that want to demonstrate a true
commitment to reducing their greenhouse emissions pledge to lower them by 1% a
year. If they surpass that goal, they end up with permits they can sell to
others. If they fail, they are penalized by having to buy permits. (A:
You got to understand what they’re saying here. If you pass the goal,
you’ll be put down as a pledge. You end up with permits you can sell to
others. If you fail, you’re penalized by having to buy permits.)

What is
unusual is that no one forces anyone to join the exchange. (A: That’s
at the moment. The big boys at the top, I’ve read the articles, are
making a fortune off it. At the bottom, the tax payers fund it
all.) Participation is voluntary. But once a business has signed up,
it is contractually obligated(A: Right. Remember that
voluntary part?) to buy or sell permits based on its performance. A
company that beats the 1% goal gets both good publicity and a financial reward,
and the specter of the potential penalty helps it reach that goal. (A:
So, punishing yourself if you can’t make the goal. It’s going to punish
YOU financially.)

(A:
Now, here it goes. Here it goes. I’m sure this article is getting
put through all the yuppie magazines at the same time and all the business
magazines.)

Why not offer
the same opportunity to individuals? (A: That’s you and me.) You
could contract to reduce your home energy consumption by 1% a year for each of
the next ten years. (A: You have no idea how the cost of living is
going to go up to in the next few years.) When you beat that target,
you'd get permits to sell. When you miss, you'd pay a penalty by buying unused
permits from others. (A: Remember, you’re contracted legally with them
so you’ll have to do it if you sign on.) As a result, your
incremental price of fuel would go up. Every extra Btu you use would mean
fewer permits to sell or more to buy. (A: So if you failed, if
you burned more BTUs, you’ll also have to also not only pay for that fuel -
you’re probably freezing, that’s why you’re using more - but also, you’ll have
to buy more permits because of the penalty.)

This
incremental price shift is like a self-imposed tax on energy
consumption. It creates an incentive to conserve. But it's different from an
ordinary tax in that you may not have to pay anything. If you hit your target,
you won't owe a dime. (A: It’s a casino. It’s another casino
idea. This for gamblers to be addicted to.) Thus the scheme
gives you an incentive without hitting you over the head.

Creating such
a market might seem difficult, and the transaction costs could outweigh the
benefits. Therefore we propose that utility companies set it up(A:
Well, that’s wonderful that the utility companies will set it up for you…) and
do all the trading for you. When you sign up, the utility company will give you
permits equal to 99% of your previous year's consumption. (A: You know
the price is going to go up every year. It always does, sometimes twice a
year, for your fuel, right?) To the extent that you beat that 99%
target, you'll get credit for the value of your extra permits, with a minimum
price of 5 cents per kilowatt-hour. That 5 cents is our estimate of how much
utilities are already spending, per kwh saved, on programs to help consumers
conserve energy, and it's enough to provide a big incentive. (A: This
is like gambling talk. You ever talk to people who are really into
gambling and the horses, and so on? They’ve got all these terms and
percentages and so on… for their bets.) It's about 75% of the average
price for electricity in the U.S., not including transmission and distribution
costs. When you miss the target, the utility will buy the extra permits and
bill you, up to a maximum price of 10 cents per kwh. Utilities should be
allowed to buy renewable energy credits from one another, too, if it makes for
a cheaper way of obtaining them. (A: How’s it going to get
cheaper? Everything is going up. Always does. That is the law
of the financial history. Everything goes up all the time.)

So
here they are trying to confuse the people and at the same time promising them
they can win something at the same time if they meet their targets. Maybe
we could all bundle up in sweaters and your face might be a bit blue but you
might survive the winter. You’ll be a very good, good person. You
might get a little gold star from the IPCC at the United Nations. Who
knows? Or you might just die and freeze to death. That’s the
rubbish that’s getting peddled out there as they create this MASSIVE, NEW
economy. It’s a must be.
It was all done before we even heard of it, all this stuff. Even the
carbon trading, etc. I’m sure Gore was told about this 30 years ago when
he was picked and his future was read to him. They said you’re going to
be this, this, this and this by the year so and so. And you’ll bring in
carbon trading. He probably said what’s that? And they had to give
him a lesson on basic physics and what carbon is.

Everything
that happens is set up years and years in advance INCLUDING who they’re going
to give you as politicians… years and years in advance. Their roles are
all worked out for them long, long ago. Long ago. We’re on one big
agenda, you see. It’s no coincidence the Club of Rome published that very
thing in their book. They said in their book - it was in the 1970s
- that they hit upon the idea of global warming to be used as the big
stick on the public. That’s a long time ago… and they were working on it
all then and giving the boys their future roles. Back with more after
these messages.

Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. There’s
been a big council, ongoing council, on the go for some time. It’s called
Comparative Effectiveness Research. It was set up by the present
government to find ways to cost-cut across the public sector. Now, for
all those who are rah-rahing for the coming socialized medicine, that’s where
you walk into factory clinics, hope to see a doctor, and if the doctor’s called
away to a hospital, you all have to come back the next day. That kind of
stuff. The kind they have in Britain and elsewhere and Canada as well, some
parts like where I live. They’re trying to find ways of cutting costs,
you see. That’s what it’s really all about. Comparative
Effectiveness is what they’re after. Something that’s not quite the same,
but it’s effective… to some extent or other, in some vague way. It says
here

Comparative
Effectiveness Research Funding

Federal
Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research

The American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created the Federal Coordinating Council
for Comparative Effectiveness Research (A: They love these long
terms.) to coordinate comparative effectiveness research across the
Federal government. The Council will specifically make recommendations for the
$400 million allocated to the Office of the Secretary for CER.

Comparative
Effectiveness Research, CER… and it’s only costing them $400 million to do all
this research. I’m sure all the things that they’re going to bring in
were decided before they had the council. A lot of this is to do with
health care. Now you remember, I read an article 2 or 3 weeks ago where
Obama in a major speech was talking about… or an interview with a newspaper, he
talked about the elderly and what a burden and cost they are on the health
care in society. He brought into it his own grandmother, I believe,
and how much it cost to keep her going at the end. He’s made comments
like, what’s the point of giving someone an artificial hip if they haven’t long
to live? … and stuff like that. After that, we found out that Washington state just got the go-ahead to
commit the first eugenics act or euthanasia act, I should say, on someone who
was elderly. Now the state wants this power to kill.

Personally,
I don’t care what people do. All down through history RELATIVES have
attended people who were terminally ill and in awful pain. Everyone knows
this. Everyone knows this. Doctors all know it. But what it really is about is giving
government the right to decide who lives and dies. That’s
different because, remember, they have political policies to follow, agendas to
follow. Techniques, they call them. Technique. They’re
addicted to technique. They also want the right to decide who gets born
and who doesn’t get born. Remember that too.

I’ll
put the link up to this particular Comparative Effectiveness Research Funding
and you can go into it yourself. There’s a PDF you can get on it as well,
but I’m also going to put up a video link. I think it was of this actual
meeting to do with health care. Mr. Obama’s favorite right-hand man on
the issue was on the panel and when he’s challenged - because he has written
before, according to this reporter who challenged him - policies advocating
euthanasia, he gets up and has to leave suddenly. You’ll see that
happening. I think he’s the man from the Executive Intelligence Review
that asked the right questions. He knew his stuff. You’ll see this
right-hand man who’s to be in charge of your health care get up and suddenly
have to go. It’s on YouTube. I’ll put that link up for you to see.

Also,
there’s a link here for YouTube to do, I think it was one of the early morning
American shows, but it’s “US to get 3 flu shots” and they want to do it BY
LAW. You’ll hear them discussing it. You also hear them discuss how
they’ll introduce it with a massive BOMBARDMENT of media, which this YouTube
video from the main stream is part of obviously. That’s what
that’s out there for. Why do they want 3 flu shots? Well, they want
you take the normal flu shot to begin with, the common one, the ones
that never work. They have the wrong mixes. They tell us that every
spring. They’ve never got it right yet, but they want to give you
the common type PLUS the Swine flu one, followed by a booster.

Now,
lets go back into when Baxter Laboratories sent out those mixes for
inoculation, they were checked I think in Hungary or somewhere, where they
caught them in Czechoslovakia and tested them on ferrets and they killed all
the ferrets. Then they found out they had the common flu mixed with the Avian
flu, the VERY THING they have told us they hope NEVER HAPPENS in nature.
They did. Well, here’s the theory of that. Here’s the theory of
it. As viruses spread from person to person, especially flu, the virus is
called the great robber. It takes DNA, little bits of DNA, from a victim
to the next victim and introduces that previous victim’s DNA to the new
victim. So it’s always changing its composition. Now, in
laboratories, they use animals, for instance, for what they call hosts or
breeders. Fast reactors - they even joke about it - fast reactors, is IN
the body of the animal and they breed up the viruses. A live being will
breed it up. I’m going to explain why giving a common flu virus and this
new one together in the same host might be the very killer… it’ll create the
killer that they’re after. Back with more after these messages.

I
am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about viruses
and how they mutate and rob a little bit of DNA from each victim and constantly
are changing as they go to the next victim and drop that DNA in the victim and
leave it behind sometimes. The whole theory of contagion, of course, in
virology is based upon the constant mutations of viruses because they ARE
always taking bits of DNA from hosts. That’s why they tell you some of
the major diseases out there can’t be handled because they’re rapidly going
into different directions, different strains, thousands of strains, etc, etc,
etc.

Remember,
a couple of months ago I talked about the CDC and read the articles where
they’d created a killer virus. They’d actually reconstructed the Spanish
flu, basically by using the common flu today, taking 3 particular genes, adding
it to it, and creating the killer… just to see what would happen in nature, they
told us… right. Now, in nature, this robber, this virus sweeps across the
population, supposedly. The odds are that eventually it will get 3, at
least 3 particular virus genes, in sequence, from different victims to make it
the killer. It’s what they’re supposed to be afraid of. Now the
last thing you would want is to attach that to the more prevalent, common
flu. Because now you’ve got a REAL KILLER on your hands because it’s far
more contagious, as opposed to the Swine flu. People are even wondering
if it really does exist.

We
find out - and I’ve read the articles too - in countries like Scotland, they
are diagnosing them just at facial value. A runny nose, oh, it’s Swine
flu. They weren’t taking tests, swab tests or anything. Other
countries have been doing the same. We know it’s been hyped up out of all
proportions. We also know that the few deaths that there have been are
generally in children or infants that are born 3 months premature, with other
complications, or other people with massive complications, which is standard in
any flu. But they really, really
want to give us these injections. As I say, the last thing you
would do, according to their OWN theories, if they’re telling us the real
theories… I wonder if THEY know the real theories, because they keep
changing them. However, if they’re going by their own present theories,
you would not want to use a host, that’s you, and put in a common flu and then
give you another injection with this Swine flu, supposedly, because out of that
YOU’RE NOW THE BREEDER. You breed millions of viruses and possibly that
combination, the deadly one, will suddenly appear. So I don’t understand
this logic at all. It is not logic, in fact.

It’s
an agenda. I’m very, very suspicious of these agendas. VERY
suspicious indeed. Especially when I’ve been going over the World Health
Organization and its other department, the World Population Council who want to reduce the population.
That’s their mandate. Look at their own site and see for yourself.
Why would the big, bad wolf want to help you? They give it in children’s
fairy stories because children understand the punch line. They know that
the big, bad wolf will never help you. It’s the adults that forget it,
through their propaganda. Amazing isn’t it?

Here’s
an article here on the big, big food bank. You see, the big food bank
they set up off Norway is storing all the world’s seed. There’s not only
one, by the way, there’s other ones as well. They’re storing the world’s
grain, the natural grain, for the future, you understand. After all the
big battles and population reduction and the starvation, the descendants of the
wealthy elite - those who are chosen, those who have evolved more than the
rest of us - will have all this stuff to themselves to feed
themselves. They’re having tours of the wealthy elite at the moment TO
this particular bank. This one is from IceNews.

IceNews
– Daily News

US
VIPs to visit Svalbard’s Global Seed Bank

By A. Rienstra on Jul 20, 2008

A diverse
delegation of VIPs from the US will travel to Norway’s Arctic archipelago of
Svalbard this week in an attempt to learn more about global warming and climate
change.

The group of
Americans comes as a high profile nod from politics and business at a time when
climate change is being taken increasingly seriously in the USA. CNN founder
Ted Turner (A: You know, that other guy that wants to drastically
reduce the population. He’s publicly said so many times.), Google
founder Larry Page, billionaire philanthropist George Soros (A:
Ha! He’s just a front man for Rothschild.), former Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright (A: The one who liked to kill off all the Iraqis by
starvation and said it was justified.) and ex-US President Jimmy Carter are
just some of the well-known faces in the delegation. (A: What
they’re getting shown is how their future offspring, all their descendants,
will be fed from that when we’re all dead.)

The focus of
the trip, which was organised by the National Geographic Society (A:
You know. The ones that’s shown us all these wonderful photographs around
the world and taught us to respect insects and mosquitoes and things that bite
you.), is to examine the revolutionary Global Seed Bank that opened this
February. The monumental facility houses seed samples from across the
globe. (A: Of course as Monsanto’s been going in for years and
years and years with the modified stuff, the local peoples have been using less
of their own or even disregarding it until it falls away so they can’t go back
to the old stuff. All the old stuff’s been saved by these geezers in a
place like this one.)

When it was
opened, the seed bank on the remote island of Spitsbergen contained 268,000
different seed samples, each one from a separate farm to ensure diversity. The
Svalbard Global Seed Bank is the first step in a novel attempt to preserve the
earth’s biodiversity, which is vanishing at an alarming rate.

Crop
diversity is essential for future food production. This will protect mankind’s
food from disease and pests which could eradicate an entire species of crop.
The seeds are housed in a ‘fail-safe’ vault which has been dug deep into a
frozen Arctic mountain. Scientists expect the vault to be secure for centuries.

For security
reasons, the delegation from America will not be allowed to enter the actual
rooms where the seeds are kept. (A: Boy, they’re taking no
chances with this stuff, eh? No chances at all. Quite something.)

It’s
no wonder we always hear ONE side of the story on the media and from all these
IPCC experts and so on at the United Nations. They ban people from going
to their meetings with any opposing opinion or evidence. This is from The
Telegraph.

Polar
bear expert barred by global warmists

Mitchell
Taylor, who has studied the animals for 30 years, was told his views 'are
extremely unhelpful’, reveals Christopher Booker.

Christopher Booker / 27 Jun 2009

Over the
coming days a curiously revealing event will be taking place in Copenhagen. Top
of the agenda at a meeting of the Polar Bear Specialist Group (set up under the
International Union for the Conservation of Nature/Species Survival Commission)
will be the need to produce a suitably scary report on how polar bears
are being threatened with extinction by man-made global warming.

This is one
of a steady drizzle of events planned to stoke up alarm in the run-up to
the UN's major conference on climate change in Copenhagen next December. (A:
They did the same story last time. This is true, what they’re
saying. It’s meant to stoke up alarm by giving us SCARY, SCARY
scenarios.) But one of the world's leading experts on polar bears has
been told to stay away from this week's meeting, specifically because his views
on global warming do not accord with those of the rest of the group.
(A: There’s democracy in action. They’re really after the truth
in democracy aren’t they?)

Dr Mitchell
Taylor has been researching the status and management of polar bears in Canada
and around the Arctic Circle for 30 years, as both an academic and a government
employee. More than once since 2006 he has made headlines by insisting that
polar bear numbers, far from decreasing, are much higher than they were 30
years ago. (A: So there you are. They’re actually on the
increase. I’ve actually read reports
the other day about the same thing.) Of the 19 different bear
populations, almost all are increasing or at optimum levels, only two have for
local reasons modestly declined.

Dr Taylor
agrees that the Arctic has been warming over the last 30 years. But he ascribes
this not to rising levels of CO2 – as is dictated by the computer models
of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and believed by his PBSG
colleagues – but to currents bringing warm water into the Arctic from the
Pacific and the effect of winds blowing in from the Bering Sea.

He has also
observed, however, how the melting of Arctic ice, supposedly threatening the
survival of the bears, has rocketed to the top of the warmists' agenda as their
most iconic single cause. The famous photograph of two bears standing forlornly
on a melting iceberg was produced thousands of times by Al Gore, the WWF and
others as an emblem of how the bears faced extinction – until last year the
photographer, Amanda Byrd, revealed that the bears, just off the Alaska
coast, were in no danger. Her picture had nothing to do with global warming
and was only taken because the wind-sculpted ice they were standing on made
such a striking image. (A: The actually swam back to the
shore. [laughs] Seeing is believing, eh? A picture is worth a
thousand words.)

Dr Taylor had
obtained funding to attend this week's meeting of the PBSG, but this was voted
down by its members because of his views on global warming. The chairman, Dr
Andy Derocher, a former university pupil of Dr Taylor's, frankly explained in
an email (which I was not sent by Dr Taylor) that his rejection had nothing to
do with his undoubted expertise on polar bears: "it was the position
you've taken on global warming that brought opposition". (A:
So, only those who are cheerleaders for global warming are getting in.
Remember too, all the articles I’ve read where they have actually said that the
ice was 3 foot THICKER this year at the arctic than previous years. It’s
really, actually growing. And when it doesn’t grow on one side, it grows
on the other. Nothing’s static up there. It never has been.
Nothing’s ever been static.

There
you go. There’s how you take a photograph. You make people feel
sorry thinking oh, my God, those poor bears died. No they didn’t die;
they swam back to shore. They had a good little dip, a good swim, and a
good laugh, and went back to shore. Like they always do. You know
how FAR bears can swim? They can go sometimes hundreds of miles… if they
want to. Amazing, eh? An ignorant public are so easy to
manipulate. What was it too, that you find that Brzezinski said in his
book Between Two Ages? They’d
create a public that would be highly emotive. Emotional talk was all you
had to give them to get your way with them to manipulate them. They
have created that society. Dumb, stupid and ready to cry tears at any
drop of a penny. It’s been done.

From
The Mail Online.

Brown
facing revolt over plans to raid health, transport and education budgets to pay
for latest round of spending

By James Chapman / 30th of June
2009

Gordon Brown (A:
That’s the Prime Minister in from Blair. Again, another Fabian and he’s
an actual Fabian member.) was facing a Cabinet revolt today as it emerged
his latest round of spending on 'social housing' will be paid for out of other
Government departments' budgets. (A: In other words, they’re
cutting back.)

The Prime
Minster yesterday unveiled an additional £1.5 billion to build 110,000 'social
homes' which will form the centrepiece of Labour's pre-election fightback.

But the plan
will not be funded with new money, ministers confirmed yesterday. (A:
We’re told. But you get scrolling down it, it actually says that they’re
afraid there could be riots coming because of the massive cutbacks.
That’s what the story is really, really all about. Massive cutbacks… if
they can’t, basically, keep the people going, feed the people and so on.)
[He predicted 'riots on the streets' unless politicians are honest about the
need to rein in public spending.] ['That would be the worst of it: you go
in to an election pretending you are not going to have to make spending
reductions, then you have to make them, and then you really do have riots on
the streets because people do not have faith in their politicians.']

I’ve
mentioned too, that the world we’re to go into is to be a vegetarian
society. It’s been said so many times for the last 50 years. We
find many top writers and futurists putting this stuff into their books,
etc. Newt Gingrich was pushing it as well, on behalf of Toffler, in his
book The Third Way. He said it will be a vegetarian world and it
must be so. Here’s The Mail Online.

Eat
red meat just three times a week, says World Wildlife Fund

By Sean Poulter / 29th June 2009

Packs of red
meat should carry warning labels advising shoppers to ration themselves to
three portions a week, amid controversial claims that livestock production is
killing the planet. (A: Everything, EVERYTHING, everything that
keeps you alive - EVERYTHING - is going to be held in proxy for you by
government. In other words, it’s not yours
anymore. Nothing is going to be yours
anymore. Anything you need to live, you’ll have to beg or plead of bribe
for it.)

The proposals
come from the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) (A: You know, that one, that
Prince Phillip. The guy who says that if he comes back in reincarnation,
he wants to come back as a virus that will kill a lot of people. That’s a
fact. He did say that. He’s the head of it, World Wildlife Fund.),
which also wants Britons to switch to milk substitutes as part of a radical
move away from dairy farming. (A: I wonder if that will also
affect the Royal herds of Angus that they have away up in Scotland for all the
Royalty? They actually fly the chef up to have a tour of the beef herds
when they’re having a party and he picks out the ones to slaughter. I
wonder if it will affect them? Somehow I don’t think so. Prince
Phillip.)

However, the
food industry yesterday slammed the idea as 'dangerous', 'totally unrealistic'
and likely to decimate British agriculture.

WWF argues
that meat packs should carry a warning label reading '1 of 3 a week max'
while bottles of milk or packs of cheese should state: ' 1 of 3 a day
max'. (A: I told you after 9/11, I says, you know you’re going
to see a whole war scenario put down our throats including rationing one
day. You got to understand how they’re doing it. They’re literally
introducing all those things you would see in a TRUE ongoing war. What
was it that they said at the Club of Rome? To unite the planet, to make
people subservient to their governments and obey into this new order, they’d
have to create a WAR SCENARIO. That means ration cards. It means
rationing food. It means people being moved from area to area under the
guise, obviously, of coming plagues, etc. ID cards… all that stuff.
They’re using war scenarios and this is part of it.)

The
organisation also wants the composition of ready meals changed to, for example,
reduce the amount of red meat in a cottage pie or dairy in a cauliflower
cheese.

Why
don’t we tell them to go and get stuffed? Because, you see, really, what
are they? They’re another NON-governmental organization. We don’t vote them in. So, why do
they have any say? Why to they have priority say in any politician’s
ear? It’s because it’s the agenda, you see. It’s the agenda.
They’re only one of thousands, ‘a thousand points of light’ as Mr. Bush Sr.
called them, that are working through government. The Soviet
style. Rule by Councils. The true democracy, according to them, is
THE COUNCILS. That’s what the NGOs represent, but they’re all funded
by the foundations. Foundations.

In
polity.org.za it covers a meeting that was held with Gordon Brown and other
Prime Ministers. This was in 2008.

FINANCIAL
CRISES

Commonwealth
say IMF, UN 'inadequate' on crises

By: Reuters / Published: 10 Jun 08

British Prime
Minister Gordon Brown, at the close of the meeting, said bodies such as the
International Monetary Fund were no longer fit for the purpose. (A:
…of basically responding to the crisis of the planet. Now, that was before the crash. And here he is
talking about a new Bretton Woods THEN and a new body for the United Nations
and higher status for the IMF. Back with more after this break.)

I
am Alan Watt and we’re back, Cutting Through The Matrix. I’ll put these
links up on my site at the end of the show. You can look into them
yourself. This last one, before I go to the callers, is amazing.
Here’s Mr. Brown calling for a new Bretton Woods, calling for either a
different IMF or a much more bolstered up IMF to deal with international
crisis, etc BEFORE the crash happened. The very same things he was
calling for a year later. Very same things as the G20 meeting. You
think nothing’s planned in advance? He even talks here about food
shortages. 2008, June.

"We
acknowledge that we face and particularly the poorest countries of the world
face three major crises," he told a news conference.

"We have
food shortages, fuel shortages and oil price rises that have been incredibly
damaging to all economies and the credit crunch which is affecting finance
throughout the world."

He raised the
prospect of a new conference along the lines of the original Bretton Woods
meeting that set up the World Bank, IMF and other bodies after World War Two.

Now,
I’ll go to the callers and there’s Jeff from Massachusetts. Are you there
Jeff?

Jeff:
Yes. I’m right here.
How’s it going?

Alan:
It’s going not bad, apart from all
the rain we’re getting, after the spray.

Jeff:
Well, that’s it. You know
what’s funny is? All this environmental stuff is nothing but naked
communism. Because in Red China, they
tell the people, you have to have one child. In communist Russia, most of
the people don’t have cars, only the elite have cars. Most of the sheeple
are forced to take buses. Number three, a long time ago, I worked in a
bakery and this person said to me, Jeff, I don’t want to talk about religion or
geo-politics; all I want to talk about is sports and pornography. You
see, it’s like the people have been turned into seals and the government feeds
them a fish. What happens when you take
away their fish? What happens when the dog doesn’t get his food?
The dog gets angry. That’s when you have riots and the government can
manipulate the riots.

Alan:
That’s right.

Jeff:
To make is so you can’t even get
out of your town without having an ID card on you and that’s what they do in
communist countries.

Alan:
That’s exactly what the Club of
Rome advocated. They liked the collectivist/soviet system. That’s
what they planned for the future on a world basis.

Jeff:
Exactly. You know,
that’s exactly what you’re dealing with, Global Communism. I think of
communism from China, Russia and the Capitalism in America as competing
predators. The scholars have said that.
The fact is, as a predator we’re about to get eaten and we have been
infiltrated by communism, China and Russia, and we are about to have our lunch
eaten. In fact, we created communism but the communism from Russia and
China, we can’t control it any more.

Alan:
That’s right. The thing is
too, the same boys that created the world communism, are the same boys that run
the moneyed system anyway. It’s far easier for them to deal with the
heads of nations than to collect debt independently from each individual.
They get the governments to do it for them through taxes. It benefits the
bankers. That’s why the bankers funded communism in the first place.

Jeff:
Exactly. But before I get
off the phone, I believe in my heart of hearts that the communism from China
and Russia is like a Frankenstein monster that can not be controlled and
eventually we’re going to be taken over by Russia and China and we’re going to
be dictated by Russia and China and we’re going to be vassals of Russia and
China and there ain’t anything we can do about it.

Alan:
I think it’s even worse. I
think they’re going to decimate the planet. They’ve got it figured out,
I’m sure, how many Chinese they want, how many Britain’s they want and so on,
ideally. In fact, they’ll even have it worked out already because they’ve
got the human genome finished long ago. They know who they want.
They know whose children they want. That’s how they’re going to get away
from that one. They’re not worried about Russia or China invading
anybody. They’ve got the future all mapped out, even their food supply up
in the Norwegian waters.

From
Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or
your Gods GO with you.