I have something else you might try. I was getting a lot of rattling UNTIL I tightened the head bearings.
The centre stand does come away from its rubber stop but it needs quite a hefty bump or whoop to get it to do it. Not just the general stutter bumps you're encountering on most of your video.
To check if your head bearings need adjustment, ride along at about 20mph and apply the front brakes HARD. If you get a clonk, you need to adjust.

That is a great point, I will check on the head bearings.
Thanks
Lion

__________________Whenever we are riding, we are an ambassador to our sport

Loaded 20628 and went for a little test ride. I like the new tune, seems to have softened that on/off throttle response a bit. I didn't have stalling problems before so I can't speak to that but I haven't had stalling problems afterward either.

Yes, they are the 31 & 38 L. I did not paint them; they are anodized silver. The last bare aluminum bag I had got residue all over everything I put it in.

Shep

On the old Happy Trails aluminum bags I have, I used Contact Paper on the inside. The kind of sticky stuff that people put on shelves and such. I find this to be better than powder coat as it quiets down things bouncing around the inside. The outside looks better in raw aluminum too, in my opinion.
The bags I have were on the KLR I used to have. I considered using Happy Trails mounts and the old bags, but that would have been about 42" wide and I thought that was too much. I think the ideal thing in afterthought would be if I got the SW Motech racks and cut some inches of the right side bag. Would have been cheaper and lighter than the Jesse bags and would have had a more home made look to them. As it is, I went for the jesse bags. heavy and wide, but nice stuff.

I had the new tune installed yesterday. My XC idles a lot smoother, & no stalling. I did notice the new tune calls for atleast 91 octane. No air filter change. I tried to recreate when I had problems (extremely hot stop & go traffic) with no stalling.

I had the new tune installed yesterday. My XC idles a lot smoother, & no stalling. I did notice the new tune calls for atleast 91 octane.

Let's not get this confusion started again. The tune requires 87 octane as measured by the CLC method used in the USA. 87 octane by the CLC method is equivalent to 91 by the RON method. So it is also true to say that the Tiger 800 requires minimum 91 RON octane, except that is useless information and needlessly confusing since we don't use that method to measure octane in the U.S.

Let's not get this confusion started again. The tune requires 87 octane as measured by the CLC method used in the USA. 87 octane by the CLC method is equivalent to 91 by the RON method. So it is also true to say that the Tiger 800 requires minimum 91 RON octane, except that is useless information and needlessly confusing since we don't use that method to measure octane in the U.S.

Why would you want both of these bikes? They are so similar... Granted the Triumph triple has more power but the all purpose aspects of the two bikes are incredibly similar.

He likes to get the spanners out occasionally so he still needs the BMW

The Tiger is for riding.

__________________
2002 black Tiger955i, 72000 miles and counting.
2011 black Tiger800XC, The other British Land Rover. 40000 miles and counting.
2013 black Tiger800XC, The other British Land Rover. 500 miles and counting.

He likes to get the spanners out occasionally so he still needs the BMW

The Tiger is for riding.

That BMW has never broken down... has never stalled either.
Only problem it has ever had was a discharged battery, when I was away for 6 months and forgot to connect it to a tender.

And it will beat the Tiger on the dirt roads. I know this for a fact. I have them both and I rode both of them on the same road I use to test my bikes' set up. Compared to the Tiger, that BMW is a light weight.

The Tiger... I bought it for the road. And it beats the BMW on that department.

Lion

__________________Whenever we are riding, we are an ambassador to our sport