Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Moral Politics

¡Hola! Everybody…

I haven’t blogged since sometime in early January – the longest
blog hiatus I’ve ever taken. My new gig (that I absolutely love!)
has me busy. It’s a whole new set of skills I’m exercising -- mostly writing
but also entailing cultivating a different perspective. I suspect I will be
very busy for a long time. LOL I miss blogging and will probably resume posting
regularly, though not as often as I have in the past.

Switching tact, in an essay reminiscent of a “man bites
dog” story, former Goldman Sachs executive, Greg Smith, wrote a
blistering NY Times Op Ed piece that’s trending today. In it he writes
of “… the trajectory of its culture, its people and its identity,” and that he “can
honestly say that the environment now is as toxic and destructive” as he has
ever seen it.

Really Greg? I’m shocked! On the other hand, you have
been at Goldman Sachs for over 12 years, have made a boat load of money doing
the same shit you are now rejecting as immoral, and now you come clean?

::blank stare::

Where were you before all this? Where were you during the
time leading to the coming of the Great Repression in 2008? Excuse me if I call
bullshit on your hypocritical ass and let you know ahead of time I will not
be buying your forthcoming book I’m sure your ghost writer is outlining as we
speak.

* * *

It is not what you look at but what you see.

-- Henry David Thoreau

Most of my readers know how much
I detest overly simplistic explanations. Take these for example:

Idiotsareconsistently
voted
into office = Voters/ people are stupid.

The subprime meltdown was the
consequence of clueless borrowers.[1]

Guns don’t kill people, people
kill people.

I could go on ad nauseum with a
list of the foolish and narrow-minded shit people pull out of their arses in
their quest to form opinions. I believe that the greatest postmodern challenge
facing us is our inability to apply what C. Wright Mills called the
sociological imagination (1959). Mills described the sociological
imagination as the capacity to shift from one perspective to another: from
the political to the psychological; from examination of a single family to evaluation
of the national budgets of the world; from considerations of an oil industry to
studies of contemporary poetry. Simply put, the sociological
imagination is the capacity to view issues from a wider perspective --
inclusive of divergent points of view.

This lack of a sociological imagination
is killing us – literally speaking.

We blame “a nation of idiots” on
the election of an idiot; lazily ignoring the massive propaganda machine that
idiot is tied to. We blame borrowers in what is the greatest financial scam in
our nation’s history, ignoring the decades of deregulation and dismantling of
government insight that paved the way, not just for the subprime meltdown, but
also Enron and every other corporate malfeasance, since the Savings & Loan debacle
of the 1980s.

In fact, it is a common practice
of conservatives to set up government agencies for failure (via taking away funding)
and then blame any failure, not on the cause (often lack of oversight—deregulation),
but the very agencies they set up to fail. We ignore the fact that a gun gives
people -- many unstable -- the power to inflict destruction like no other
instrument. Sure pencils don’t make people misspell words, but let me see how
many people you can shred with one pencil as opposed to an automatic rifle.

::blank stare::

The genius of the conservative
movement lies in how they have convinced you
that a regressive rather than a progressive tax structure is better for you
(they call it “tax relief”). It’s how they convinced a number of you to go
along with trickle-down economics -- an economic theory advocating for upward
shifts in wealth and income no credible
economist has ever endorsed.

As cognitive linguist, George Lackoff,
has shown, our opinions are most often driven by the beliefs, or better put -- by
the metaphors -- we live by (2006). Conservatives have exploited this fact for
some time and that is partly the reason why people voted for Bush II or still
see Palin as something other than warped. Most importantly, it is why you vote against your own economic
interests. Conservative operatives discovered that people vote their values,
not on the issues. Therefore, if you can frame, say, “family values” in a
conservative way, you have co-opted the most important metaphor we all live by
-- families.

Progressives have labored under
the false notion that reason or issues should come first. Yes, issues are
important, but people vote on values (frames) – people make decisions based on
emotions-- and if you can’t connect
with people on values, you will never get your agenda on board. Let us take the
following facts as an example:

During the Iraq War, an
overwhelming majority of Americans wanted a timetable for pulling out our
troops. On economic policy, most Americans support
stronger government regulations to protect citizens. On trade, polls
consistently show the public is very suspicious of the free trade agreements
that have hurt the middle class [2].
On health care, surveys consistently show that about two-thirds of those asked
desire a government-guaranteed universal health-insurance system -- even if
that means higher taxes.

If, as polling data consistently
shows, the mainstream is more left of center, then why aren’t these issues on
the table for public discourse? Part of the answer lies in the reality that the
issues have not been framed adequately. Part of this lack is the result of a
lack of resources and access. Powerful interests invested in undermining progressive
policies, have unlimited media access – indeed they often own much of the
media. One of the ways issues are framed is through repetition. Jon Stewart
from The Daily Show has made a career out of showing hilarious video clip
compilations of right-wing pundits and leaders repeating the same emotionally
charged words over and over.

Far right-wing politicians use this technique
consistently. Santorum frames his attack on women’s reproductive rights as a life and deathmoral struggle. His expressed and constantly repeated belief or
frame (echoed 24/7 on mainstream news media cycles) is that as a society we are
locked in a crusade against those who wish to persecute Christians. His key
words include “reckless,” “immoral,” “dangerous,” and his overriding metaphor
is one of war – the war of “good” vs. “evil.”

This is a very effective way to
express and embed an idea. The words come with frames of reference attached.
Those frames in turn latch on to and activate deeper, subconscious frames. When
repeated every day, the words serve to reinforce deep frames by actually
strengthening neural connections in the brains of listeners. Even if you are “smart”
or consider yourself a latte-drinking, NPR-listening, sophisticated liberal,
this onslaught of frames will have an
impact on your thinking. At the very least, these frames serve to move the “center”
of the political landscape to the far right, in the process relegating
progressive ideas tom the margins of the national dialog. In other words,
progressive ideas and policies are not even up for discussion and whether you
agree with them or not, we are all the poorer because of it.

In that way, I can stand up on a
stump and yell out catch phrases such as “family values” or “tough on crime”
and immediately in your brain a barrage of conservative-framed issues appear. I
can blurt out, “tax and spend” and immediately conservative frames come to your
mind. And this is how public consent is manufactured (Herman & Chomsky,
2002) rather than agreed upon in a conscious, democratic manner.

Lakoff,
G. (2006). Thinking points: Communicating
our American values and vision: A progressive's handbook. New York: Farrar,
Straus and Giroux. (You can download a PDF version of this book for free by clicking here)

[1]While the government sponsored mortgage giants were
certainly not blameless, Federal Reserve data shows conclusively that it
was private mortgage brokers, not Fannie and Freddie, who drove the
subprime housing bubble:

·More than 84 percent of the
subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions.

·Private firms made nearly 83
percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year.

[2] Public opinion polls
suggest that Americans are deeply suspicious of free trade agreements. A
September 2010 NBC
News/Wall Street Journal survey, for instance, found that 69 percent of
respondents believe the deals cost more jobs than they create, compared to only
18 percent who believe the reverse.

21 comments:

What i don't understood is in truth how you are not actually much more well-favored than you might be right now. You are very intelligent. You realize thus considerably relating to this topic, made me in my opinion believe it from a lot of varied angles. Its like men and women aren't involved unless it is one thing to accomplish with Girl gaga! Your individual stuffs nice.All the time handle it up!My page : twb.nyaku.net

Simply want to say your article is as amazing. The clarity in your publish is simply spectacular and that i can think you are knowledgeable on this subject.Fine with your permission let me to snatch your feed to keep updated with imminent post.Thanks 1,000,000 and please keep up the gratifying work.Here is my webpage - hypnosis stop smoking

After looking into a few of the blog posts on your blog, I honestly like your technique of blogging.I bookmarked it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back soon. Take a look at my web site as well and tell me how you feel.Also visit my weblog :: salesman seo

Thank you for the good writeup. It in truth was once a entertainment account it. Look advanced to more brought agreeable from you!However, how could we communicate?Also visit my webpage ; prospectonline.com

I don't even know the way I ended up right here, however I believed this submit used to be good. I do not know who you're but definitely you're going to a famous blogger should you aren't already.Cheers!

I have been surfing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours.It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be a lot more useful than ever before.

Hi! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any problems with hackers?My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing months of hard work due to no data backup. Do you have any methods to stop hackers?

Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just your articles?

I mean, what you say is valuable and all. However think of if you added some great photos or video clips to give your posts more, "pop"! Your content is excellent but with pics and clips,this site could certainly be one of the most beneficial in its field.Great blog!

I really like your blog.. very nice colors & theme.Did you design this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you? Plz respond as I'm looking to design my own blog and would like to know where u got this from. cheers

Thanks for a marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you may be a great author.I will make sure to bookmark your blog and will come back someday. I want to encourage you continue your great work, have a nice holiday weekend!

Headlines

Support This Blog

Follow Me

About Me

My life experiences have led me to strive to help others move their lives in a positive direction, exploring opportunities that would otherwise be closed to them. I like to think I sit at the crossroads of the dialectic between knowledge and action. I hope that what transpires here is reflective of my beliefs.