Access

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Description:Current issues are now on the Chicago Journals website. Read the latest issue.Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world"s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.

The "moving wall" represents the time period between the last issue
available in JSTOR and the most recently published issue of a journal.
Moving walls are generally represented in years. In rare instances, a
publisher has elected to have a "zero" moving wall, so their current
issues are available in JSTOR shortly after publication.
Note: In calculating the moving wall, the current year is not counted.
For example, if the current year is 2008 and a journal has a 5 year
moving wall, articles from the year 2002 are available.

Terms Related to the Moving Wall

Fixed walls: Journals with no new volumes being added to the archive.

Absorbed: Journals that are combined with another title.

Complete: Journals that are no longer published or that have been
combined with another title.

Abstract

The origins and maintenance of complex life cycles and of host associations are generally assumed by evolutionary ecologists to be governed by optimizing selection for maximal resource exploitation. Widely accepted hypotheses for the evolution of host-plant alternation (heteroecy) in aphids exemplify such assumptions. For example, the hypothesis of complementary host growth states that heteroecy is a result of selection for optimizing nutrient intake in a seasonally varying environment. However, these optimization hypotheses are inconsistent with many of the facts concerning aphid heteroecy. Heteroecy is frequent in aphids, and current knowledge of aphid phylogeny indicates that it originated several times. In contrast, heteroecy is rare or absent in other insects, implying that an adequate explanation must invoke features of aphids not found in other insect groups using similar resources. An alternative hypothesis, the fundatrix-specialization hypothesis, is based on the narrower range of tolerances of one of the seasonal morphs of the life cycle, the first spring female, or fundatrix. The fundatrix specializes on ancestral woody host plants when they are in their most favorable seasonal state. Heteroecy appears to be a consequence of the seasonal polymorphism of aphids, which causes some morphs (the fundatrices) to be more evolutionarily constrained than others (the summer females) in their abilities to acquire hosts. Some aphid lineages have escaped this constraint by replacing the ancestral fundatrix morph and remaining all year on former secondary hosts, thus becoming secondarily autoecious. Most of the large and species-rich groups of Aphidinae on herbaceous angiosperms probably are derived from ancestors showing such life-cycle reduction.