I know it isn't on the high-priority list, but its analysis is so tl;dr it's not even funny. It was also written in BW1 (as demonstrated by the claim that Reckless is illegal with Stealth Rock), meaning it doesn't take threats like hail and Nidoqueen into account.

I do not think that Rhydon needs a big enough update that it needs a revamp. The change you mentioned as well as other small tier update changes can be made via SCMS. I also think that Rhydon was very well-written and in-depth so the tl;dr is fine. Someone else can vouch for an update though, feel free.

I do not think that Rhydon needs a big enough update that it needs a revamp. The change you mentioned as well as other small tier update changes can be made via SCMS. I also think that Rhydon was very well-written and in-depth so the tl;dr is fine. Someone else can vouch for an update though, feel free.

Click to expand...

Okay, I understand. Thank you for the quick response.

May I reserve Glaceon instead? I'm aware that it's listed as a rejected mon here, but the rationale given is that it needs hail to be viable, and hail was banned at the time. Since hail is now legal, I think it deserves an analysis.

Moderator

Moderator

I realize he isn't on the priority list atm, but I feel as though he's a pretty relevant and useful Pokemon in the current metagame (which I think other users could likely confirm), and the current analysis is rather dated and rather paltry in terms of detail. Pretty please? :)