To link to the entire object, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed the entire object, paste this HTML in websiteTo link to this page, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed this page, paste this HTML in website

Proposed work plan for the cooperative agreement between the US Environmental Protection Agency and NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program

Proposed work plan for the cooperative agreement between the US Environmental Protection Agency and NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program

1
ANNUAL WORK PLAN
for the
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AND
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM
OCTOBER 1, 2006 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
Approved by
APNEP Policy Board on
June 15, 2006
CE-97464802
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 4
BACKGROUND 5
MAP: Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Region
EPA IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW 2005 6
ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND ONGOING PROJECTS FOR FY 2006 8
I. PROGRAM REFORM 8
II. FY 2006 ACTIONS & PROJECTS 9
III. FY 2005 ACTIONS & PROJECTS 16
IV. FY 2004 ACTIONS & PROJECTS 18
V. FY 2003 ACTIONS & PROJECTS 21
VI. FY 2002 WATERSHED DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS 22
ONGOING LONGTERM PROJECTS & ACTIONS 25
I. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring/ Mapping
II. EPA Supported Nonpoint Source Pollution Related Restoration Project
III. Program Administration
IV. Virginia Watershed Field Coordinator
V. Citizens’ Monitoring Network
VI. Program Enhancements Relating to Smithfield Foods Agreement
VII. Other Projects
3
PROJECTS & ACTIONS FOR FY 2007 30
Program Administration
VA Watershed Field Coordinator
Board & Committees Support
Financial Planning
SAV Mapping
Citizens’ Monitoring Network
NC Teaching Fellows
Outreach Activities
Web Site
EstuaryLive!
ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL 34
I. APNEP PERSONNEL 34
II. GRANTS TO LOCAL ENTITIES 36
Table 37
III. LEVERAGE FUNDS 39
IV. ESTIMATED FEDERAL COST SHARE (Budget for FY 2007) 40
V. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE (Match for FY 2007) 41
VI. TRAVEL 44
4
INTRODUCTION
Contents of this document:
􀂃􈍁 A progress report detailing accomplishments in FY 2006 is provided on pages 8 through 29.
􀂃􈍔 The FY 2007 Work Plan and budget items are presented on pages 30 through 33.
􀂃􈍁 Administrative and financial information items are presented on pages 34 through 46.
Purpose: The purpose of this agreement is to provide support to the NC Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) from the US Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) for continuing demonstration of implementation of the unique management strategies
recommended in the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program’s (APNEP) Comprehensive
Conservation and Management Plan and support for the APNEP Mission to identify, restore and
protect the resources of the region. This agreement represents a funding increase for the amount
of $502,600 and time extension to September 30, 2008 for Cooperative Agreement #CE-
97464802.
Period of Performance:
The period of performance under this agreement is from October 1, 2006 through September 30,
2008.
Principal Contacts:
EPA Project Officer APNEP Director
Fred McManus Bill Crowell
US EPA Region IV Albemarle-Pamlico NEP
61 Forsyth Street 1601 Mail Service Center
Atlanta, GA 30303 Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
(404) 562 – 9385 (919) 715 - 1327
5
BACKGROUND
The Albemarle and Pamlico Sounds represent the nation’s largest lagoonal estuarine system.
The system is composed of seven sounds and five major river basins draining over 30,000
square miles of watershed in northeastern North Carolina and southeastern Virginia. The
sounds, rivers, creeks, wetlands and terrestrial areas provide habitat for an abundance of animal
and plant species. People depend on the system for residential and resort development, food,
recreation, mining, forestry, agriculture, business and industry.
The Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program (APNEP), a part of the US Environmental
Protection Agency’s National Estuary Program (NEP) since 1987, developed a Comprehensive
Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) that was ratified by the Governor of North
Carolina and approved by the US EPA in November 1994. The CCMP is intended as a
practical, cost-effective and equitable approach to managing the valuable resources of the
Albemarle-Pamlico region.
The Program is located in the Office of Conservation and Community Affairs within the NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources with program personnel in Raleigh,
Washington, and Greenville, NC and Suffolk, VA.
6
EPA IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW 2005
EPA Implementation Review Response
The EPA conducted an Implementation Review with NC DENR and APNEP staff between
March and June 2005.
An October 19, 2005 letter stated that the EPA found that the APNEP continues to make
“significant progress” in implementing its CCMP and determined that the APNEP “passed”
the 2005 Implementation Review and will be eligible for FY 2006, 2007 and 2008 funding
authorized by the Clean Water Act §320. A copy of the EPA review letter is attached at the
end of this Work Plan.
The EPA review identified the following challenges:
CCMP Update and Changes in Priorities: Develop a process or timetable for CCMP
update and priority evaluation. The EPA recommends that the APNEP develop a
process that includes a timetable and milestones. The revised CCMP should include
necessary actions, information needs, and support mechanisms. The APNEP should
consider identifying an interim set of priorities, as well as a mechanism to add to and
modify these actions, that takes into account factors affecting environmental issues
relevant to the estuaries and sounds.
􀂃􈍁 APNEP will be developing a process with the Policy Board for updating the
CCMP in FY 2007.
Visibility: The APNEP’s location within a state agency presents challenges in terms of
its ability to appear visible and independent. In order for the APNEP to be seen as
inherently autonomous the Program must be, and must be perceived to be, independent
of any particular interest group or agency. The Director needs to be able to respond to
and act on committee recommendations independent of state agency activities. In
addition, the Program should strive to take a leadership role when possible and assert
itself as an equal partner in joint ventures. The Program should also strive for
recognition when engaged in key activities.
􀂃􈍁 APNEP continues to develop partnerships and increase its visibility in
watershed and estuarine issues. The CCMP update will provide for an
opportunity to facilitate greater involvement and understanding about the
program and the CCMP.
Partnerships and Fundraising: The APNEP’s extensive watershed (30,000 square
miles) presents numerous challenges. Limited resources constrain the program’s ability
to impact the watershed. This underlines the importance of strategic stakeholder
alliances and effective fund-raising efforts. To obtain additional resources for CCMP
implementation, the APNEP should develop a strategy that identifies funding needs and
alternatives, and provide for diversifying its sources of funding to supplement existing
funds. As part of that strategy, the APNEP should work with local governments to
7
secure at least a minimal annual contribution from them to support the APNEP's work.
EPA is prepared to assist the Program in this activity.
􀂃􈍁 APNEP will develop a plan to obtain additional resources with the
assistance of the EPA as proposed in this work plan. EPA will provide
$10,000 dollars to support this action.
Environmental Indicators/Monitoring Plan: The STAC work group should begin to
develop a comprehensive monitoring strategy and plan, taking into account previous
efforts. This plan should include the continuation of the existing monitoring program
for the Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system and sounds that is a part of EPA's National
Coastal Assessment (NCA). APNEP needs to identify an ongoing source of funding for
that effort. We believe it would be most appropriate for the state of North Carolina to
provide funding for the North Carolina component of the NCA. In addition, the plan
should be based on the concept of long-term status and trends monitoring or the
identification of temporal trends or changes over time. The Program should work with
all appropriate government agencies (federal, state, and local) and other stakeholders in
the Albemarle-Pamlico region to develop estuarine and freshwater monitoring and
indicators.
􀂃􈍁 APNEP will continue on its present course to develop a comprehensive
monitoring strategy, albeit on a schedule that has indicators by the end of
2006, and a monitoring plan in 2007. The last half of 2006 will see a
transition from indicator development being a STAC-driven exercise to a
more balanced exercise that reflects more policy and citizen input.
Consistent with recommendations in the draft NEP indicator development
strategy (issued April 2006), the proposed mechanism for achieving this
balance is through the creation of an “Indicator Steering Committee” with
representation from the STAC, Policy Board, and Citizens Advisory
Committee.
Environmental Progress: The APNEP protected or restored nearly 38,500 acres of
habitat over the 2002-2004 period. This is a significant accomplishment and represents
more acreage of habitat protected or restored than any other NEP in Region IV. Yet, the
APNEP reports no or very little data regarding "environmental trends" in the estuarine
system and its watersheds. Status and trends data are key to evaluating program impacts
and results and can be used to send a powerful message to citizens, stakeholders, and
elected officials. The Program should identify existing and develop long-term
environmental data sets, and use the information to report on environmental progress.
The information can also be used to increase support and funding for implementation of
the CCMP and for public outreach efforts.
􀂃􈍁 APNEP will continue to inventory past and current long-term environmental
monitoring projects and programs in the APNEP region. Data from many
such monitoring activities will be documented in the monitoring plan and
likely assessed in APNEP’s future “state of the environment” publications.
8
ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND ONGOING PROJECTS FOR FY 2006
Activities for FY 2006 continued to be focused on program improvement and rejuvenation, and
coordination with the new Policy Board & Committees for CCMP implementation, as well as
demonstration, educational and outreach activities.
It should be noted that demonstration projects for FY 2006 have had several delays related to
the “Requests for Proposals” process and in contracting with various parties. It is anticipated
that most projects will be completed by December 31, 2006. The status of each project is
presented within this Work Plan.
Activities and accomplishments from October 1, 2005 through June 1, 2006, are summarized
below:
I. PROGRAM REFORM
Executive Order #74
On May 16th, 2005, North Carolina Governor Michael F. Easley signed Executive Order
# 74: Creation of A Program Office, A Policy Board, and Advisory Committees to Support
Natural Resource And Environmental Management in the Albemarle-Pamlico National
Estuarine System. This Executive Order is essential to the future of the APNEP and was
developed after more than two years of program review and assessment, and stakeholder
participation. This Executive Order provides the operational framework for the program. A
copy of Executive Order #74 is attached at the end of this Work Plan.
Program Office
The Executive Order establishes an Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program
Office to coordinate and facilitate the implementation and advancement of the CCMP,
the APNEP mission, and the activities of the Policy Board and Advisory Committees.
The APNEP Program Office will serve as a conduit for information between the Policy
Board, Advisory Committees, state and federal agencies, local government, tribes,
academia and the public. Additionally, the Executive Order states that the Program
Office will be located in the Offices of the Secretary of the North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural Resources.
Policy Board
A Policy Board for the Albemarle-Pamlico watershed is established by the Executive
Order to work with DENR and the Program Office to support, evaluate, update,
advocate and guide the implementation of the CCMP and the APNEP mission. The role
of the Policy Board is to guide, evaluate and support the CCMP implementation process
and advance the CCMP and its management actions, and to ensure the highest level of
collaboration, coordination and cooperation among state and federal agencies, local
governments, the public and various interest groups. The Policy Board will consult
with the Advisory Committees and the Program Office for recommendations pertaining
to implementation of CCMP management actions at the regional and local level, and the
9
coordination and development of research and monitoring priorities. A major duty of
the Policy Board is to evaluate the relevance of the CCMP and to make
recommendations on amending it to address new or emerging issues that may affect the
significant natural resources of the Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system. Additionally,
the Policy Board, in cooperation with the Program Office, will develop an annual report,
budget and work plan. The Policy Board held its first meeting on October 31, 2005.
Advisory Committees
The Executive Order establishes three advisory committees to assist the Policy Board in
guiding the APNEP and CCMP implementation.
A Committee of Citizen Advisors ("Citizen Advisory Committee") is established
to advise and support the Policy Board, and to serve as a liaison to local agencies
and interested parties regarding environmental and natural resource management
concerns and issues relevant to implementation of the CCMP and the APNEP
mission. The Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) held its first meeting on
January 20, 2006.
A Committee of Management Agency Representatives ("Management Advisory
Committee") is established to facilitate and support the implementation and
advancement of the CCMP management actions, and the APNEP mission. The
Management Advisory Committee (MAC) should be established by September
31, 2006.
A Committee of Science and Technical Advisors ("Science and Technical
Advisory Committee") is established to advise the Policy Board and agencies
responsible for implementation of the CCMP on scientific and technical issues.
The Science and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) continues to meet
quarterly.
II. FY 2006 ACTIONS & PROJECTS
The following are ongoing or completed actions since October 1, 2005.
Program Administration
For more detail see Administration and Financial, and Ongoing Projects sections.
Status: Ongoing
Output: Program administration, partnership building, and CCMP
implementation
Outcome: See specific projects
Estimated Cost: $250,366
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
10
Watershed Field Coordinator - Virginia
For more detail see Ongoing Projects section.
Status: Ongoing
Output: Program administration, partnership building, and CCMP
implementation
Outcome: Increased presence of APNEP in Virginia, new Chowan
Watershed Roundtable
Estimated Cost: $30,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Board and Committees Support
Support activities for the Board and advisory committees, printing, meeting support, etc.
Status: Ongoing
Output: Partnership building, outreach, CCMP implementation
prioritization
Outcome: New and greater public involvement, estuarine indicator
development
Estimated Cost: $10,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Demonstration Projects
Proposals were solicited for demonstration projects to provide environmental benefits in
the Albemarle-Pamlico region. Results of the demonstration projects will be
transferable to other National Estuary Programs. Project selection was made by the
Citizen Advisory Committee on April 7, 2006.
Carteret Community College Shoreline Restoration Project
This project will engage at risk youth through hands-on learning and community
mentoring partnerships that allow them to understand the value of wetlands,
clean estuaries, and environmental stewardship, resulting in the direct restoration
of a shoreline fronting Bogue Sound at Carteret Community College. The
project will rely on partnerships between the North Carolina Coastal Federation
(NCCF), Carteret Community College (CCC), APNEP, the Boys and Girls Club
of America (BGC), and citizen volunteers.
Status: Pending Contract
Intended Output: Involvement of 40 at-risk youth from the local Boys and
Girls Club, and 20 community volunteers. College
students will serve as mentors to the youth and community
volunteers will assist both groups with the wetland
planting.
Intended Outcome: Restore .25 acres of wetlands. Additional outreach
activities will reach an estimated 500,000 individuals.
Estimated Cost: $ 20,978
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: $ 7,570
11
Perquimans County High School Constructed Wetland and
Environmental Education Project, Phase II
This project is a collaborative venture led by the Perquimans County Schools
to improve an outdoor education program for 570 high school science
students, their teachers and the local community. The proposed project would
build on the successful first stage of the Jennie’s Gut Constructed Wetlands
Project, funded in part with a 2005 grant from APNEP. The proposed project
would improve outdoor teaching and learning opportunities by replacing a
pedestrian bridge to allow greater water flow.
Status: Pending Contract
Intended Output: Educational wetland, public involvement.
Intended Outcome: Reduction in sediments, nutrients and toxicants from
nonpoint sources, improvement of water quality for a
town and community, improved water flow
Estimated Cost: $ 11,400
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: $ 2,000
Williamston High School Low Impact Development Project
This project will install several examples of Low Impact Development (LID)
practices on the site of Williamston High School in Martin County, NC. The
integrated management practices of a cistern, level spreader, vegetative
buffer, bioretention, rain gardens and permeable pavement will help treat
runoff from the school site before it enters the Roanoke Basin watershed. The
practices will be used to educate students, officials, and citizens of the
importance of integrated management practices and how they can be used at
the residential and commercial levels to treat runoff.
Status: Pending Contract
Intended Output: Demonstration BMPs installed
Intended Outcome: Reduce erosion and untreated stormwater runoff,
improved water quality; reduction in the amount of
treated municipal water used for landscaping and other
non-potable uses
Estimated Cost: $ 25,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: Pending
Red Mill Elementary School Riparian Buffer Project and Environmental
Education Center, VA
This project will construct a 35-foot riparian buffer zone adjoining Red Mill
Elementary School, and develop an education program with displays and
outdoor classroom facilities.
12
Status: Pending Contract
Intended Output: Education program with displays
Intended Outcome: A 35-foot riparian buffer zone
Estimated Cost: $ 25,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: $ 17,000
Manteo Middle School Stormwater Demonstration Project
Students, teachers, and volunteers will plant rain gardens in an area designed
to catch stormwater from the school’s parking lots and roof. Information on
stormwater pollution and control will be incorporated into the science
curriculum, and signs will inform the public about stormwater problems and
control.
Status: Pending Contract
Intended Output: Two landscaped rain gardens with native plants, with
signs explaining stormwater runoff and the need to
control it, greater student awareness of effects of
stormwater
Intended Outcome: Improved stormwater management
Estimated Cost: $ 14,500
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: $ 7,340
Wet and Wild: Utilizing the Wet Detention Pond at P.S. Jones Middle
School as an Outdoor Classroom
This project proposes the creation of an outdoor classroom in and around a two-acre
wet detention pond that has been constructed on the 88-acre tract of land on
which P.S. Jones Middle School and John Small Elementary School are being
built. Grant funds will be used to design and construct a wheelchair-accessible
observation platform and pier overlooking the detention pond to provide students
and teachers with opportunities for scientific study, observation, and data
collection. Grant funds will also be used to purchase and introduce plants
selected for their documented ability to uptake and/or degrade toxins in pond
water.
Status: Project pending feasibility review by NC Cooperative
Extension
Intended Output: Boardwalk, outdoor classroom
Intended Outcome: Improved stormwater management, vegetation, greater
student awareness of effects of stormwater
Estimated Cost: $ 25,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: Pending
13
Other Projects
Funds budgeted in this category were used to supplement the demonstration projects in
Virginia.
Status: Allocated to FY 2006 Demonstration Projects (VA) – in progress
Estimated Cost: $12,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Mapping
APNEP plans to continue leading the NC/VA SAV mapping project. The SAV
workgroup is currently developing the plans for the next round of flights. See
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring in Ongoing Projects for more
information.
Status: Ongoing project
(Note: FY 2006 funds have not been contracted to date)
Output: Reports and GIS data, better management of SAV resources
Outcome: New management actions to protect SAV resources
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Leverage: Pending
Citizens’ Monitoring Network
For more detail see Ongoing Projects section.
Status: Ongoing
Output: Data, citizen involvement
Outcome: Increased knowledge on status of local waters
Estimated Cost: $56,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
2006 Teacher Institute
APNEP will partner with the Office of Environmental Education and the Environmental
Education Fund to offer a teacher training institute at the Trinity Center in Salter Path,
NC. Approximately 20 teachers will be provided with curriculum training in earth /
environmental sciences with hands-on activities, site visits, and specific content to
support inquiry, experiential, and research-based instruction on estuary and water
resources. The dates for the institute are July 30, 2006 - August 3, 2006.
Status: In progress
Intended Output: 20 teachers exposed to environmental education opportunities
Intended Outcome: Increased environmental education in schools
Estimated Cost: $22,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
14
Outreach Activities and Web Site
APNEP continues to develop a greater capacity of outreach and community
involvement, including web site updates and redesign. The APNEP web site
(www.apnep.org) will continue to disseminate information about the mission and goals
of the NEP and provide information on progress of CCMP implementation. The
APNEP web site also carries past issues of The Beacon.
Status: In progress
Output: Newsletters, press releases, posters, and web site
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness, implementation of CCMP
Estimated Cost: $ 1,600
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006 and NC DENR support
Local Government Survey
In order to assess the status of the current relationship and potential for greater local
involvement, APNEP contracted for local governments to be interviewed to assess
needs that can be addressed by APNEP program actions. The contractor met with
representatives of county governments and Councils of Government to determine
needs related to implementation of the CCMP.
Status: Complete
Output: 20 local governments reached, reports
Outcome: Better understanding of local government issues
Estimated Cost: $6,000
Funding Source: NC DENR
Leverage: $6,000
Estuary Live! Spring 2006
APNEP partnered with the NC National Estuarine Research Reserve and others to offer
interactive field trips for students from North Carolina and throughout the world.
Status: Complete
Output: 4 days of broadcast
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 500
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2003
Leverage: $9,000
CHPP Implementation Booklet
APNEP partnered with the NC Coastal NPS Program and NC DENR to develop an
informational booklet highlighting the Coastal Habitat Protection Plan (CHPP) to assist
NC DENR in its outreach efforts.
Status: Complete
Output: CHPP implementation booklet
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $6,681
15
Funding Source: NC Coastal NPS Program
Leverage: $6,681
CHPP Posters
APNEP again partnered with the NC Coastal NPS Program and NC DENR to develop
information to assist in the CHPP outreach effort. Staff worked to develop a set of
general habitat posters.
Status: Complete
Output: CHPP Implementation posters
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 3,000
Funding Source: NC Coastal NPS Program
Leverage: $ 3,000
Legislative Oyster Roast
APNEP participated in an oyster roast held for legislators on Wednesday, May 24th 2006
to draw attention to efforts to restore oyster habitats along the coast and the North
Carolina Oyster Restoration and Protection Action Plan: A Blueprint for Action.
Status: Complete
Output: Legislative oyster roast, media event
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $11,000
Funding Source: NC Coastal Federation, The Nature Conservancy, NCDENR and
others
Leverage: $11,000
Albemarle-Chowan Watershed Roundtable
The APNEP partnered with the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation to
lead the formation of an Albemarle-Chowan Watershed Roundtable on March 29, 2006.
The initial meeting focused on the “state of the watershed” and opportunities to move
forward with grant proposals to secure additional resources. Small group discussions
centered on outreach/education, planning and research, and implementation.
Status: Ongoing
Output: Citizen advisory group
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness and citizen participation
Estimated Cost: Pending
Funding Source: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation
Leverage: Pending
16
Regional Wetlands Grant: Development of a Comprehensive Assessment and Tracking
Methodology for Wetland Functionality in the Chowan Estuary of Western Albemarle
Sound
APNEP partnered with Environmental Defense to obtain a Regional Wetlands Grant from the
EPA to develop a comprehensive assessment methodology for wetland functionality in the
Chowan Estuary of Western Albemarle Sound, as the basis for setting goals for wetland extent
and condition, developing programs to achieve those goals, and tracking progress. The work
will be used to prioritize short-term actions, and as an integral part of the long-term
implementation plans for state and federal resource management in the region.
Status: In Progress
Output: A comprehensive assessment methodology for wetland functionality
Outcome: Greater wetland restoration and conservation
Estimated Cost: $1,013,968
Funding Source: EPA and Environmental Defense funds for Regional Wetland Grant
Leverage: $1,013,968
III.FY 2005 ACTIONS & PROJECTS
The following are ongoing or completed actions from the FY 2005 Work Plan since October
1, 2005.
Conservation Assessment for the Albemarle-Pamlico Region, Phase II
The NC Natural Heritage Program is working to identify owners of lands which contain
Significant Natural Heritage Areas identified during the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study
from 1989 to 1993, and to meet with the landowners to inform them of the ecological
significance of their lands and to encourage their wise stewardship of their properties.
Project builds upon FY 2003 project.
Status: In Progress
Output: Data, report
Outcome: Conservation easements or other land protection
Estimated Cost: $12,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2005
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Mapping (Ongoing)
See Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring in Ongoing Projects for more
information.
Status: In Progress (Phase II)
Output: Reports and GIS data, better management of SAV resources
Outcome: New management actions to protect SAV resources
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2005
Leverage: Funds were directly linked to $20,000 from the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission in contracted project. Additional leverage is pending.
17
Conservation Assessment for the Chowan River Basin in Virginia
APNEP is working with the Virginia Natural Heritage Program to conduct a conservation
assessment to identify each habitat type of conservation concern within the region of study.
The goal of this project is to improve our knowledge of the conservation needs of
Virginia’s Chowan River basin’s natural heritage resources and develop better conservation
targets.
Status: Complete
Output: GIS Data, report
Outcome: Greater understanding of habitat types of conservation concern
Estimated Cost: $15,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2005
Wetlands Assessment and Mapping for the Chowan River Basin
APNEP is partnering with the Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences and others to conduct a
riparian wetlands survey /assessment along the Chowan River. This process will lead to the
development of GIS data layers of the various wetland habitats. Collected data identifies
shoreline use, condition, natural habitat environments, and anthropogenic modifications
to the shoreline that may impact habitat viability.
Status: Complete
Output: GIS Data, report
Outcome: Greater understanding of wetland status along the Chowan River
Estimated Cost: $30,196
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2005
Leverage: Pending
Estuary Live! Fall 2005
APNEP planned to partner with the NC National Estuarine Research Reserve to offer
interactive field trips for students from North Carolina and throughout the world. The
broadcast was canceled due to effects of Hurricane Ophelia.
Status: Canceled
Estimated Cost: $ 0
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2003
Under Served Communities – Estuarine Education
APNEP is working with various partners to develop a pilot program in two elementary
schools (grades K-4) in the APNEP region to assist students and their families in learning
new skills and developing new abilities to enhance their understanding of their connections
to the estuary and the environment.
Status: Pending additional funds
Estimated Cost: $8,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2005
18
IV. FY 2004 PROJECTS
The following are ongoing or completed actions from the FY 2004 Work Plan since October
1, 2005.
EPA Financial Planning – Program Development
This project was identified in the FY 2004 work plan to be addressed as funding became
available. As APNEP reevaluates its structure, staff and Board members will work with
EPA staff to identify and develop strategies for leveraging funds beyond EPA grant funds.
EPA staff / contractor will lead this effort. Staff will work with the EPA and the Policy
Board or Citizen Advisory Committee to develop the meeting. EPA has made funding
available for planning in FY 2007.
Status: New
Intend Output: Report, public involvement
Intended Outcome: Additional resources for CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $10,000
Funding Source: EPA supplemental funds for Financial Planning in FY 2007
Atlantic White Cedar Restoration Project
The NC Division of Coastal Management / Coastal Reserves planned to replant
approximately 38 acres of forested wetlands with native hardwood species, cypress, and
Atlantic White Cedar at the Preyer-Buckridge Coastal Reserve in winter 2004, but heavy
rains and flooding have delayed site preparation and replanting. Staff now plan to install a
tide gate to reduce the effects of saltwater intrusion.
Status: Pending
Intend Output: Report, data
Intended Outcome: Habitat restoration
Estimated Cost: $16,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Demonstration Projects with Virginia
In an effort to further build partnerships with resource agencies and others in both NC and
VA, at least one demonstration project will be developed in the shared river basins.
Status: In Progress - Funds were applied to FY 2006 School Yard Demonstration
Projects in Virginia.
Estimated Cost: $10,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
19
FY 2005 School Yard Demonstration Projects
School Yard Demonstration Projects were solicited in each of the river basins to provide
environmental and educational benefits in the Albemarle-Pamlico region.
Student Wetland Nursery Program
The Student Wetland Nursery Program engages students through hands on projects that
enable them to understand the value of wetlands, resulting in the direct restoration of
wetlands and continued stewardship of valuable coastal resources. Through this project,
students will learn about wetlands and stormwater, construct wetland nurseries on the
school grounds, cultivate wetland grasses, and then use these grasses to help restore a
wetland area in the Neuse Watershed.
Status: In Progress
Output: Classroom instruction for two middle school science classes
(representing at least 50 students and teachers), conduct seed
experiments in each classroom to generate 1,000 wetland plants,
construct two wetland nurseries at two schools for cultivation of
at least 4,000 additional plants (for a total of 5,000 plants), public
outreach, assist students to plant wetland grasses at restoration
sites, restoring at least one half acre of wetlands. Produce and air
a half-hour cable access show available to 500,000 households.
Outcome: Two wetland nurseries at two schools, planting of 5,000 wetland
plants, restoring at least one half acre of wetlands. Project
knowledge due to a half-hour cable access show detailing the
student wetland nursery project.
Estimated Cost: $13,210
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Leverage: $ 5,000
Washington Montessori School Bio-Swale
Washington Montessori constructed a bio-filter (bio-swale) stormwater treatment system
to address excess run off from the roof and gravel parking lot. The system will not only
be sufficient for the current 8,000 square foot building, but for future school building
expansions as well.
Status: Complete
Output: A bio-filter (bio-swale) stormwater treatment system to address
excess run off from the roof and gravel parking lot.
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness for students, teachers and
parents, on-site stormwater treatment
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
20
Northampton Outdoor Learning Center Nature Trail
The Northampton Nature Trail provides students with hands on learning as well as an
outdoor learning environment for environmental education. The restored barrow area
will serve as the orientation site for the nature trail classroom. The APNEP grant funds
were used to construct a teaching shelter and a handicap accessible boardwalk onto an
island that exists at a natural pond on the trail site. The Outdoor Learning Center is a
short distance from a new K-5 elementary school site.
Status: Complete
Output: Nature trail, boardwalk, and signage
Outcome: Environmental education facility and nature trail, increased
environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Leverage: Pending
Gates County High School Outdoor Environmental Learning Site
This project is a collaborative venture led by Gates County Public Schools to plan
and construct a boardwalk, bridge and observation platform which will enhance
science teaching and learning for 640 high school students and their teachers and
increase environmental awareness for the general public of Gates County.
Status: In Progress
Intended Output: Boardwalk, bridge and observation platform, riparian buffer,
enhanced science teaching and learning for 640 high school
students and their teachers, and increased environmental
awareness for the general public of Gates County.
Intended Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 17,215
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Estimated Leverage: $ 1,000
J.E.J. Moore Outdoor Classroom and Nature Trail
This project built an outdoor classroom equipped with an educational kiosk and
seating for 35 students, as well as interpretive signs along a nature trail in a wooded
wetland area.
Status: Complete
Output: Trail, signage, outdoor classroom
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $10,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Estimated Leverage: $ 5,500
21
Perquimans County High School Constructed Wetland and Environmental
Education Project
This project is a collaborative venture led by the Perquimans County Public Schools
to re-shape and restore a natural wetlands located on the grounds of Perquimans
High School, to construct an access boardwalk, bridges and observation deck, and to
use the restored accessible wetland as the basis for an outdoor education program for
570 high school science students and their teachers.
Status: Complete
Output: Report, wetland, and environmental awareness
Outcome: Restored wetland, increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Mini-grants
Status: Reallocated to FY 2006 Demonstration Projects
Estimated Cost: $4,000 - funds were allocated to FY 2006 Demonstration Projects
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
V. FY 2003 PROJECTS
The following are ongoing or completed actions from the FY 2003 Work Plan since October
1, 2005.
Comprehensive Monitoring Plan
The APNEP Science Coordinator is coordinating the activities associated with development
of the indicators and the monitoring strategy. The Science Coordinator has reviewed work
efforts previously completed by the program and has conducted meetings with other DENR
agency staff to gather information on existing and proposed monitoring programs and
projects. The APNEP Science Coordinator, STAC and DENR agency staff will continue to
address this task in FY 2007.
Status: In Progress
Intended Output: Plan
Intended Outcome: Enhanced environmental monitoring
Estimated Cost: $3,000
Funding Source: Unencumbered EPA funds from previous years as necessary
22
Other Projects
The APNEP worked to develop partnerships to implement projects that support the mission
of the APNEP and implementation of the CCMP.
NC Division of Forest Resources (DFR) Forestry BMP Manual Revision
Project to support NC DFR to produce and distribute (via workshops and
direct mail-out) the Manual to select forest operators and forestland owners
located in the five APNEP River Basins.
Status: In Progress
Output: BMP Manual
Outcome: Increased use and awareness of forestry BMPs
Funding Source: Unencumbered EPA funds from previous years as
necessary
Funding: $15,000
Leverage: Pending
VI. FY 2002 WATERSHED DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
Funds from a previous EPA grant (CE- 994645-94) were dedicated to support a round of
watershed demonstration projects. The River Basin Regional Councils selected projects and
allocated funding levels in May 2004. The total funds available for the projects was
$250,000 with $50,000 available per basin. A “Request for Proposals” was open for
governmental agencies, educational institutions, and non-profits.
The projects address the main sections of the APNEP Comprehensive Conservation and
Management Plan (CCMP): water quality, vital habitats, fisheries and stewardship. The
projects should have three main components: 1) they should be physical in-ground projects,
2) they should have a public outreach/education element, and 3) they should have
transferable methods. Prospective grant recipients were encouraged to partner with others to
leverage additional funds.
The following is a summary for each project active in FY 2006:
Low Impact Development Demonstration and Education for the Upper Neuse River
Basin
Demonstrate the effectiveness of Low Impact Development techniques in reducing
stormwater runoff
Lead Agency: North Carolina State University Water Quality Group
Partners: DENR Division of Water Quality, NCSU Biological &
Agricultural Engineering Dept., NCSU College of Design, Habitat
for Humanity
Status: In Progress
Output: Demonstration BMPs
Outcome: Improved stormwater management and water quality
Funding: $25,000
23
Leverage: $170,100
Citizens’ Oyster Gardening Program for North Carolina
Demonstrate a way citizens can assist in restoring native oyster numbers and their
ecological functions to the estuaries
Lead Agency: Carteret Community College
Partners: DENR Division of Marine Fisheries, NC National Estuarine
Research Reserve, NC Division of Coastal Management, NC
Shellfish Growers Association
Status: Complete
Output: Educational workshops, oyster raising materials, website
Outcome: Oysters and habitat, cleaner water
Funding: $31,946
Leverage: $1,000
Stormwater Wetland at Pactolus Elementary School
Plan and create a stormwater wetland on a parcel located adjacent to Pactolus
Elementary School in Pitt County, NC. The wetland will capture runoff from the
school’s parking lot and roof drains, which presently empties into Grindle Creek as
untreated stormwater runoff. The site will educate local students about wetlands and serve
as an outdoor classroom.
Lead Agency: Pitt County Planning Department
Partners: Pitt County School Board, Cooperative Extension, Coastal Land
Trust
Status: In Progress
Intended Output: Wetland, report, educational area
Intended Outcome: Constructed wetland, better stormwater management, improved
water quality
Funding: $31,200
Leverage: $ 1,000
Bennett’s Millpond Demonstration Project
This project focused on creating a community facility to provide opportunities for
environmental education and stewardship. A “green roof” demonstration component is
included to analyze the environmental impact of a green roof design on the surrounding
microclimate. Outreach components included a Millpond calendar, a biyearly event
brochure (for the local counties) and promotional brochure for wider distribution.
Lead Agency: Edenton-Chowan County Schools
Partners: Chowan County Recreation Department, Chowan County
Status: Complete
Output: Outdoor educational facility, brochures, calendar, demonstration
green roof
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Funding: $26,740
Leverage: Pending
24
Town of Gatesville Water Quality Project
Projects consists of stormwater BMP construction and monitoring to determine pollution
contribution / changes. Construction delays have slowed the project.
Lead Agency: Albemarle Resource Conservation and Development Council
Partners: Town of Gatesville, Gates Soil & Water Conservation District,
NC Department of Transportation, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Citizens
Status: In Progress
Intended Output: Constructed wetland system to serve the town’s 160 acre
watershed, restored ditch banks and buffers, construct
educational display, report
Intended Outcome: Improved water quality and habitat, improved stormwater
management
Funding: $50,000
Leverage: Pending
25
ONGOING LONGTERM PROJECTS & ACTIONS
I. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring
The Coordinating Council elected to provide $20,000 in FY 2002 supplemental funds as
seed money to initiate a large-scale, long-term submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV)
monitoring effort to assess the extent of SAV coverage in the Albemarle-Pamlico
estuaries. An additional $6,000 was allocated in the FY 2003 Work Plan to support
DENR staff in learning about SAV mapping and restoration.
Submerged aquatic vegetation constitutes one of the most common estuarine habitats in
North Carolina. The 1990 published estimate of SAV area is 200,000 acres in NC. In
the contiguous 48 states, North Carolina is second only to Florida in acreage of SAV,
and has twice the acreage reported for Chesapeake Bay. SAV provides food and cover
for a great variety of commercially and recreationally important fauna and their prey.
Thirteen species of SAV have been reported for the Albemarle-Pamlico estuary. SAV
supports many species of fish and shellfish and are major fishery habitats of the shallow
sounds behind North Carolina’s barrier islands and along the coastal fringes bordering
the western side of these sounds.
Previous studies by NOAA and East Carolina University to delineate and quantify the
location and extent of SAV, based on conventional color aerial photography and field
sampling, were conducted in the late-1980s and early-1990s for major portions of the
Albemarle-Pamlico estuary. This information, some of which has been digitized in GIS-format,
has proven valuable to habitat managers in their review of dredge and fill related
permit applications and has helped Core Sound, Back Sound and western Bogue Sound
achieve nomination for designation as Outstanding Resource Waters.
Since that time, no major organized effort to map the location and extent of SAV
coverage in the Albemarle-Pamlico estuary has been conducted. SAV is being used as a
critical environmental indicator in several other estuarine systems (e.g., Indian River
Lagoon, Sarasota Bay, Tampa Bay and Chesapeake Bay). Currently, North Carolina
lacks the information necessary to determine reliable trends in SAV distribution and
health.
APNEP has partnered with NC Division of Marine Fisheries, US Fish and Wildlife
Service, Elizabeth City State University and the NC Coastal Nonpoint Source Program
to conduct aerial photography flights over Back Bay, Currituck Sound and Kitty Hawk
Bay.
Status: In Progress
Output: Report, GIS data, maps, educational opportunities
Outcome: Better environmental data, better resource management and
planning
Funding & Source: EPA FY 2002 – $20,000 - Complete
EPA FY 2003 – $6,000 - Complete
26
EPA FY 2005 – $20,000 Contracted (Phase II - In Progress)
EPA FY 2006 – To be contracted with FY 2007 funding for
digital image acquisition.
Partners: NC Division of Marine Fisheries, US Fish and
Wildlife Service, Elizabeth City State University,
the NC Coastal Nonpoint Source Program, and
NC Division of Water Resources.
In FY 2007 APNEP will provide the base funding necessary to acquire digital aerial
photography of potential SAV habitats in the APNEP region. This imagery is a
necessary step in providing APNEP partners with information on the current status of
SAV in the sounds. See Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring in Ongoing
Projects for more information. Also see FY 2005 and FY 2006 Projects.
II. EPA Supported Nonpoint Source Pollution Related Restoration Project (Tryon
Palace)
During FY 2001, APNEP received $75,000 to support an environmental NPS-related
restoration project in the APNEP region. These funds were used to support and leverage
Clean Water Management Trust Fund money to construct a wetland and storm water
management project associated with Tryon Palace State Historic Site in New Bern, NC.
Specifically, these funds are to create a cord grass marshland in the designated area
along the confluence of the Neuse and Trent rivers.
The current contract is ongoing and the project is still underway. Ground breaking and
site dedication occurred in the fall of 2002. Although much planning has been done, no
invoice has yet been received for the specific activity defined for this contract.
􀂙􉥔 This action supports the CCMP’s Vital Habitats Plan, Objective C, Management
Action 3: “Enhance existing efforts to restore the functions and values of degraded
wetlands and vital fisheries habitats. Develop and begin implementing an expanded
program to restore wetlands.”
Status: In Progress
Output: Wetland, riparian buffer
Outcome: Restored wetland, improved water quality and habitat
Estimated Cost: $75,000
Funding Source: EPA dedicated funds for project
III. APNEP Program Administration
Staff are responsible for the coordination, planning and successful completion of
APNEP functions including Policy Board and Advisory Committee meetings, APNEP
forums and other APNEP-sponsored events. In addition, staff monitors, and often
becomes involved in, activities of state resource management agencies that relate to
CCMP implementation. Staff also attend meetings, conferences and workshops in order
27
to stay apprised of technological advancements that may prove beneficial in the APNEP
region. Although the Policy Board and Advisory Committee are instrumental in
identifying local environmental issues and prioritizing management actions within each
basin, most management actions are implemented by various state agencies on a local,
basinwide, regional or statewide basis.
Presently, the staff consists of the program office in Raleigh, with the Director, Science
Coordinator, and Restoration Specialist. A NC Watershed Field Representative has
offices in Raleigh and Washington; the APNEP public involvement office also in
Washington houses the Community Development Specialist. The APNEP also has two
contract employees: the Citizens’ Monitoring Network Coordinator at East Carolina
University in Greenville, and the Virginia Watershed Field Representative in Suffolk.
For more detail see Administration and Financial section.
Status: In Progress - Ongoing (See Administrative and Financial Section)
Output: Program administration, reports, leverage, presentations
Outcome: Environmental result, CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $244,427 will be needed for administration and implementation of
the APNEP and the CCMP.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
IV. Virginia Watershed Field Coordinator
The headwaters for the Pasquotank, Chowan and Roanoke River basins are located
within Virginia. One of the most critical components to effectively implement the
CCMP within these basins is long-term, comprehensive coordination between North
Carolina and Virginia. The Watershed Field Coordinator for Virginia provides
coordination and support to APNEP, DENR and the Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation (VA DCR), and enhances implementation of the CCMP in
the Roanoke, Chowan and Pasquotank river basins. The APNEP supports one-half of
this position for at least 20 hours per week. The contract has been extended for another
year.
􀂙􉥔 The Virginia Watershed Field Coordinator directly supports the CCMP's
Implementation Plan, Objective A: Management Action 2: “Coordinate
implementation of the CCMP.”
Status: In Progress - Ongoing
Output: Program administration, reports, leverage, presentations
Outcome: Environmental result, CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $30,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
V. Citizens’ Monitoring Network
The APNEP Citizens’ Monitoring Network (CMN) is a network of private citizens who
monitor surface water quality in the Albemarle-Pamlico estuary and its tributaries. The
28
program began as an initiative of the Pamlico-Tar River Foundation in 1988, to protect,
preserve and promote the water quality of the Tar-Pamlico River and its watershed.
Today, the program includes all waters located in the Albemarle-Pamlico region.
The CMN has three areas of activity: Baseline Monitoring, Targeted Monitoring and
Surveys, and Water Quality Education. Program volunteers receive support in each of
these areas through water quality education and training, QA/QC workshops,
distribution of equipment and supplies, data management/analysis, and networking
opportunities. Participants primarily monitor "vital signs" of the estuary. Specifically,
parameters tested include: dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity, air and water temperatures,
and turbidity to gauge the general health or quality of water in the estuary. Using basic
but accurate water quality test kits, citizen volunteers analyze their water samples,
observe qualitative factors such as weather conditions and other visual indicators, and
record the results.
All monitoring data collected are forwarded to the CMN office at ECU where staff
compiles the information and enters the data into reporting form for citizen and
government agency use. Information is available to the public on the APNEP website at
http://www.apnep.org/ and at http://www.ecu.edu/icmr/cwqmp. This is a very popular
program and it continues to be expanded.
Operation of the APNEP Citizens’ Monitoring Network (including Coordinator,
equipment, supplies, office and lab space and indirect costs) will be continued by
extending the contract with East Carolina University.
􀂙􉥔 The Citizens’ Monitoring Network directly supports the CCMP's Stewardship Plan,
Objective B: Management Action 4: “Expand involvement in the Citizens’ Water
Quality Monitoring Program (CWQMP) and make the program more interactive
with regulatory agencies.”
Status: In Progress - Ongoing
Output: Awareness, data
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: Continued operation of the Citizens’ Monitoring Network
(including Coordinator, equipment, supplies, lab space and
indirect costs) will require $56,000 (via contract with East
Carolina University).
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
VI. Program Enhancements Relating to Smithfield Foods Agreement
In July 2000, the NC Attorney General’s Office and Smithfield Foods, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, the largest hog producing and pork processing companies in the world,
signed a major agreement. It is a legally binding agreement that focuses on the
elimination of open-air hog lagoons and spray fields in North Carolina. An element of
29
the agreement states that the Smithfield companies will play a "leadership role in
enhancing the effectiveness of the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program.” Staff
has met several times with representatives from Smithfield Farms, the NC Attorney
General’s Office and NC DENR on topics of interest. Little progress has been made and
support intentions are unclear.
In FY 2005 APNEP staff applied for two grants totaling $940,203 from the Smithfield
Environmental Enhancement Grants for SAV mapping and non-point source pollution
reduction in Ward Creek. Staff will seek additional partners and resubmit the proposals.
Status: Ongoing
Estimated Cost: No cost
Funding Source: N/A
VII. OTHER PROJECTS
GIS Outreach and Services
The APNEP had contracted with the NC Center for Geographic Information and
Analysis (CGIA) to provide GIS support and training as well as accessible and
affordable GIS data for planning and educational purposes.
Status: In Progress
Output: GIS data, training, reports
Outcome: Enhanced environmental awareness and management
resources
Estimated Cost: $18,000
Funding Source: EPA funds (Remaining from previous NC CGIA contract)
North Carolina – Virginia Shared Resources Forum
A forum for state resource agencies and local governments in the Roanoke,
Chowan and Pasquotank river basins will be held to review resources shared by
the two states. This forum has been delayed in order to assess the role of the new
Roanoke Bi-State Commission as designated by the General Assembly of both
states. Approximately $1,000 is budgeted for this effort using EPA funds from
previous years. The current strategic planning exercise has identified a
Governor’s agreement as a possible goal for the program. It should also be noted
that the APNEP Watershed Field Coordinator for Virginia is playing a key role
in inter-state relations with issues in our shared river basins.
􀂙􉥔 This action directly supports the CCMP’s Implementation Plan, Objective A,
Management Action 2: “Coordinate implementation of the CCMP.”
Status: Planning
Estimated Cost: $1,000
Funding Source: EPA funds from previous years - budgeted in the FY 2003
Work Plan.
30
PROJECTS & ACTIONS FOR FY 2007
New projects for FY 2007 will continue to support the implementation strategy as outlined in
the CCMP and support program reform and CCMP update efforts.
Program Administration
For more detail see Administration and Financial, and Ongoing Projects sections.
􀂙􉥔 These actions support the CCMP’s Implementation Plan goal: “Implement the CCMP in
a way that protects environmental quality while using the most cost-effective and equitable
strategies.”
Type: Ongoing
Intended Output: Program administration, partnership building, CCMP implementation
Intended Outcome: CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $ 244,427
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Watershed Field Coordinator - Virginia
For more detail see Ongoing Projects section.
􀂙􉥔 These actions support the CCMP’s Implementation Plan goal: “Implement the CCMP in a
way that protects environmental quality while using the most cost-effective and equitable
strategies.”
Type: Ongoing
Intended Output: Governmental coordination, public involvement
Intended Outcome: CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $ 30,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Board and Committees Support
The key element of the CCMP’s implementation is active citizen participation. On May 16th,
2005, North Carolina Governor Michael F. Easley signed Executive Order # 74: Creation of A
Program Office, A Policy Board, and Advisory Committees to Support Natural Resource And
Environmental Management in the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuarine System. This
Executive Order is essential to the future of the APNEP and was developed after more than two
years of program review and assessment, and stakeholder participation. Members are currently
being recruited to fill the positions on the Policy Board and Advisory Committees.
􀂙􉥔 This action supports the CCMP’s Implementation Plan, Objective B: “Assess the
progress and success of implementing CCMP recommendations and the status of environmental
quality in the Albemarle-Pamlico Sounds region.”
31
Type: Ongoing
Intended Output: Partnership building, outreach, CCMP implementation prioritization
Intended Outcome: New and greater public involvement, estuarine indicator development
Estimated Cost: $ 5,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Financial Planning
This project was identified in the FY 2004 work plan to be addressed as funding became
available. As APNEP continues with program restructuring, staff and Board members will
work with EPA staff to identify and develop strategies for leveraging funds beyond EPA grant
funds. EPA staff / contractor will lead this effort. Staff will work with the EPA and the Policy
Board or Citizen Advisory Committee to develop the meeting. EPA has made funding available
for planning in FY 2007.
Status: New
Intend Output: Report, public involvement
Intended Outcome: Additional resources for CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $10,000
Funding Source: EPA supplemental funds for Financial Planning in FY 2007
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Image Acquisition
In FY 2007 APNEP will provide the base funding necessary to acquire digital aerial
photography of potential SAV habitats in the APNEP region. This imagery is a necessary step
in providing APNEP partners with information on the current status of SAV in the sounds. See
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring in Ongoing Projects for more information.
􀂙􉥔 This action supports the CCMP’s Water Quality Plan goal: “Restore, maintain or enhance
water quality in the Albemarle-Pamlico region so that it is fit for fish, wildlife and recreation.”
Type: Ongoing
Intended Output: Report, GIS data, maps, educational opportunities
Intended Outcome: Better environmental data, better resource management and planning
Estimated Cost: $ 140,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Leverage: Pending
Citizens’ Monitoring Network
For more detail see Ongoing Projects section.
􀂙􉥔 This action supports the CCMP’s Water Quality Plan: Management Action 4: “Expand
involvement in the Citizens' Water Quality Monitoring Program (CWQMP) and make the
program more interactive with regulatory agencies.”
32
Type: Ongoing
Intended Output: Awareness, data
Intended Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 56,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
NC Teaching Fellows (Coastal)
APNEP will partner with NC Teaching Fellows Program, the Cape Lookout Studies Program,
Friends of the N.C. Maritime Museum, and the NCNERR to provide a Junior Enrichment
Program. Teaching Fellows are required to participate in a number of experiences designed to
enhance their campus programs and give insights into the challenges facing them when they
enter the classroom. This opportunity will be provided as a Junior Enrichment Program for
rising juniors. Participants will receive instruction in the application of practical activities and
curriculum related to coastal environments. Participants will receive activity guides and
teaching materials.
􀂙􉥔 This project supports the CCMP's Stewardship Plan Objective C: “Ensure that students,
particularly in grades K-5, are exposed to science and environmental education.”
Type: New
Intended Output: Pre-service junior enrichment for 15 NC Teaching Fellows
Intended Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 6,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Leverage: To be determined
Outreach Activities
This project supports all of APNEP’s outreach activities, including the APNEP newsletter, e-mail
updates and other outreach materials.
􀂙􉥔 This project supports the CCMP’s Stewardship Plan goal: “Promote responsible
stewardship of the natural resources of the Albemarle-Pamlico region.”
Status: Ongoing
Intended Output: Public outreach and involvement
Intended Outcome: CCMP Implementation, increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 1,173
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Leverage: To be determined
33
Web Site
The APNEP web site (www.apnep.org) will continue to disseminate information about the
mission and goals of the NEP and provide information on progress of CCMP implementation.
The APNEP web site will also carry The Beacon.
􀂙􉥔 This project supports the CCMP’s Stewardship Plan goal: “Promote responsible
stewardship of the natural resources of the Albemarle-Pamlico region.”
Status: Ongoing
Intended Output: Public outreach and involvement
Intended Outcome: CCMP Implementation, increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: Unknown
Funding Source: NC DENR
Leverage: To be determined
Estuary Live! Spring 2007
APNEP will again partner with the NC National Estuarine Research Reserve to offer interactive
field trips for students from North Carolina and throughout the world.
Status: Ongoing
Output: 4 days of broadcast
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 500
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2003
Leverage: To be determined
34
ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL
I. APNEP PERSONNEL
Program staff are responsible for the coordination, planning and successful completion of
APNEP functions including Board and Committee meetings, APNEP forums and other APNEP-sponsored/
partner events. In addition, staff monitors, and often becomes involved in, activities
of state resource management agencies that relate to CCMP implementation, the Albemarle-
Pamlico watershed or estuary. Staff also attend meetings, conferences and workshops in order
to stay apprised of technological advancements that may prove beneficial in the APNEP region
and the program.
Presently, the APNEP staff consists of the APNEP program office in Raleigh, with the Director
(Bill Crowell), Science Coordinator (Dean Carpenter), and Restoration Specialist (Kelly
Williams). The APNEP public involvement office in Washington, NC houses the Public
Involvement Coordinator (Joan Giordano) and NC Watershed Field Representative (Jimmy
Johnson). The APNEP also has two contract employees: the Citizens’ Monitoring Network
Coordinator (vacant) in Greenville, and the Virginia Watershed Field Representative (Noah
Hill) in Suffolk, Virginia.
In the coming year, the new Policy Board and Advisory Committees will be instrumental in
identifying local environmental issues, prioritizing management actions within the watershed,
and working through the NEP Program Office to advise the various state and local agencies on
CCMP implementation.
Overall administration costs for FY 2007 are estimated at approximately $ 244,427 and includes
salaries, fringe, longevity pay, rent, supplies, and indirect costs.
Program Director
The Program Director administrates and coordinates program activities and the CCMP
implementation process, involving interaction with numerous federal and state resource
management agencies, universities, interest groups, and the general public. This position
manages the post-CCMP grants and associated contracts, provides staff support to the APNEP
Policy Board and Advisory Committees, and represents the APNEP at local, state, regional and
national meetings.
Personnel: Bill Crowell will continue in this role. Mr. Crowell has been the Director
since June 2002.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Public Involvement Coordinator
The Public Involvement Coordinator supports public/ community relations and knowledge
concerning issues relating to the Albemarle-Pamlico region; facilitates the implementation of
the CCMP; develops and implements educational and outreach programs; promotes dialogue
between local government officials and private citizens; and provides liaison responsibility for
35
the Citizens’ Monitoring Network. This position also provides valuable staff support to the
Policy Board and Advisory Committees.
Personnel: Joan Giordano will continue in this role. Ms. Giordano has served in this
role since 1987.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Science Coordinator
The Science Coordinator assists the Program Director with administration and coordination of
the CCMP. This position helps design and implement a comprehensive monitoring strategy and
reporting process, guide the Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC), and reviews
project proposals and reports for merit. This position provides staff support to the Policy Board
and Advisory Committees.
Personnel: Dean Carpenter will continue in this role. Dr. Carpenter has served in this
role since November 2003.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Restoration Specialist /Watershed Field Representative
The Restoration Specialist /Watershed Field Representative assists the Program Director to
administrate and coordinate the CCMP implementation process, involving interaction with
numerous federal and state resource management agencies, universities, interest groups, and the
general public. This position assists in the management of contracts, and provides staff support
to the Policy Board and Advisory Committees.
Personnel: Kelly Williams will continue in this role. Ms. Williams has served in this
role since October 2003.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Watershed Field Coordinator (NC)
This position provides an essential function as an APNEP liaison to local governments and state
agencies. The Watershed Field Coordinator (NC) provides coordination and support to local
governments and state agencies to enhance CCMP implementation. This position also provides
staff support to the Policy Board and Advisory Committees. This position splits time between
the Raleigh and Washington DENR Regional Offices.
Personnel: Jimmy Johnson will continue in this role. Mr. Johnson has served in this role
since January 2006.
Funding Source: NC DENR
Watershed Field Coordinator (VA)
Contracted support. See description under Ongoing Projects.
Personnel: Noah Hill will continue in this role.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
36
II. GRANTS TO LOCAL ENTITIES
The Albemarle-Pamlico NEP let numerous contracts in FY 2006 in order to accomplish the
tasks presented in the FY 2003 to FY 2006 Work Plans. These items are discussed in the Goals
and Accomplishments, and the Ongoing Projects sections of this report.
Additionally, funds from a previous EPA grant (CE- 994645-94) have been dedicated to help
support numerous projects. All funds under this grant have been spent or are in contractual
obligations and should be spent by December 2007.
An additional grant was received from the EPA in December 2005. This Regional Wetland
Grant (CD-9444206) is to develop a comprehensive assessment and tracking methodology for
wetland functionality in the Chowan estuary of Western Albemarle Sound. APNEP partnered
with Environmental Defense to obtain a Regional Wetlands Grant. Environmental Defense is
providing the required matching funds for this grant. Since this project is not funded by the
section 320 funds, it is not reported in the following table.
The following table provides an overview of all completed and active grants to local entities
since October 1, 2005 for section 320 funds under CE-9746802, CE- 994645-94, or NC DENR
funds for APNEP activities.
37
GRANTS TO LOCAL ENTITIES (October 1, 2005 to June 1, 2006)
Project
Title
Funded
Amount
Project
Leader Purpose Deliverables
Completion
Date Status
Watershed Coordinator
(VA)
$30,000
VA. Dept.
Conservation &
Recreation
Fund Watershed Coordinator
in
VA-NC Shared river basins
Program support
Reports Ongoing In Progress
Citizens’ Monitoring
Network $56,000
East Carolina
University
Outreach / Monitoring Program
Newsletters
Reports,
Database
Ongoing In Progress
Riparian Restoration
(Tryon Palace)
$75,000 EPA
dedicated funds
for project
Tryon Palace
Committee
Riparian Restoration Shoreline
restoration
Reports
September
2006
In Progress
Teacher Institute 2006 $22,000 Environmental
Education Fund
Develop and Implement a Teacher
Institute for 25 teachers
Week long Institute
Report
July 2006
In Progress
Forestry BMP Manual $15,000 NC Div. Forest
Resources
Develop and Distribute a Forestry
BMP Manual
Manual
Meetings
September
2006 In Progress
GIS Support $18,000 NC CGIA GIS Support GIS Services
Training
September
2006
In Progress
LID Demo Project $25,000 NCSU Low Impact Development Demo
Construction
Documentation
Outreach
July 2006
In Progress
SAV Mapping
Phase II
$40,000 ($20 K
from APNEP)
Elizabeth City
State University
SAV mapping project
Phase I
SAV Mapping
GIS
September
2006
In Progress
Pactolus Stormwater
Wetland
$31,200 Pitt County Construct a Stormwater Wetland Construction
Documentation
Outreach
September
2006 In Progress
Conservation
Assessment NC Phase
II
$12,000 NC Natural
Heritage
Conservation Assessment Documents
GIS
August
2006
In Progress
Town of Gatesville
Water Quality Project $50,000 Albemarle RC&D Stormwater Controls
Construction
Documentation
Outreach
September
2006
In Progress
Student Wetland
Nursery Program
$13,210 NC Coastal
Federation
Student Wetland Nursery Program Construction
Outreach
July
2006
In Progress
Gates County High
School
$17,215 Gates County Outdoor Learning Center
Nature Trail
Construction
Outreach
September
2006
In Progress
38
Project
Title
Funded
Amount
Project
Leader Purpose Deliverables
Completion
Date Status
Bennett’s Millpond
$26,740
Edenton-Chowan
County Schools
Environmental education facility
and a “green roof”
Construction
Outreach
December
2005
Complete
Conservation
Assessment for the
Chowan River Basin
$15,000 Virginia Natural
Heritage
Conservation Assessment Documents
GIS
December
2005
Complete
Northampton Outdoor
Learning Center
Nature Trail
$20,000 Northampton
County
Outdoor Learning Center Nature
Trail
Construction
Documentation
Outreach
December
2005
Complete
Washington
Montessori School
Bio-Swale
$20,000 Washington
Montessori
Charter School
Construct a bio-filter (bio-swale) Construction
Documentation
Outreach
December
2005
Complete
Wetlands Assessment
and Mapping for the
Chowan River Basin
$30,196 Virginia Institute
of Marine
Sciences
Wetlands Assessment and
Mapping
Documents
GIS
May 2006 Complete
Local Government
Survey
$6,000
(NC DENR)
Boyce Hudson Local Government Survey Documents March 2006 Complete
JEJ Moore
Outdoor Classroom &
Nature Trail
$10,000 Prince George
County Schools
Outdoor Learning Center
Nature Trail
Construction
Documentation
Outreach
April 2006 Complete
Perquimans HS
Constructed Wetland
$20,000 Perquimans
County Schools
Wetland Construction
Outreach
March 2006 Complete
Citizens’ Oyster
Gardening Demo $31,946
Carteret Comm.
College Citizens’ Oyster Gardening Demo
Oysters
Outreach
November
2005
Complete
Carteret Comm. Coll.
Shoreline Restoration $20,978
NC Coastal
Federation Shoreline Restoration
Shoreline
Plantings Pending Pending
Perquimans High
School Phase II $11,400
Perquimans
County Schools
Bridge Replacement Bridge Pending Pending
Williamston HS
LID Demonstration $25,000
Town of
Williamston
BMP Construction BMP Construction Pending Pending
Red Mill Riparian
Buffer
$25,000 City of Virginia
Beach
BMP Construction
Outdoor Classroom
BMP Construction Pending Pending
Manteo Middle School
Stormwater
$14,500 Manteo Middle
School
BMP Construction BMP Construction Pending Pending
PS Jones Outdoor
Classroom
$25,000 Washington
County Schools
BMP Construction
Outdoor Classroom
BMP Construction Pending Pending
39
III. LEVERAGE FUNDS
The Albemarle-Pamlico NEP has more actively sought alternative sources of funding for APNEP
activities and projects to fulfill the goals of the CCMP. In addition, the APNEP sought out
additional avenues for collaborating with other agencies to assist in targeting these program funds
towards CCMP and basinwide goals. Where possible, APNEP worked to cost-share projects to
increase the effectiveness or the magnitude of projects, even though in several cases the APNEP was
not the primary catalyst for the project.
As the program progresses, the APNEP is working to leverage more funds through partnerships,
projects and grants. APNEP will be working with NC DENR to develop a strategy for the
development of additional state funds for program activities.
Additionally, the APNEP staff will work with EPA staff to identify and develop strategies for
leveraging funds beyond the EPA section 320 grant funds.
The APNEP has been successful in its ability to promote the needs, as well as the successes,
associated with natural resource management, protection and enhancement efforts in the APNEP
region. Several state conservation-funding sources were developed in response to research funded
by the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuary Study. These programs include Clean Water Management Trust
Fund, Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program, and the North Carolina Conservation Reserve
and Enhancement Program.
FY 2005
The APNEP was a primary partner in leveraging nearly seven times the federal grant amount in FY
2005, and assisted in the leverage for projects in the NEP program area at an overall level of
approximately 125 times the amount of funds received from the EPA.
FY 2006
During FY 2006, the Program continues to seek additional avenues for collaborating with other
partners to assist in targeting program funds towards CCMP implementation goals. APNEP will
submit its FY 2006 Leverage results in September 2006.
FY 2007
In FY 2007, the Albemarle-Pamlico NEP will continue to seek additional avenues for collaborating
with other partners to assist in targeting program funds towards CCMP implementation goals. Where
possible, APNEP will actively seek alternative sources of funding for APNEP activities and projects
to fulfill the goals of the CCMP.
40
IV. FY 2007 ESTIMATED FEDERAL COST SHARE
Federal Funds Budget FY 2007
The estimated* federal funds budget for each NEP for FY 2007 is $492,600
Supplemental funds for Financial Planning is $10,000
Total Available is $502,600
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Program Administration (Ongoing)
(staff salaries, fringe**, longevity, rent, supplies, indirect, etc.) $ 244,427
Watershed Field Coordinator (Ongoing- contract with VA DCR) $ 30,000
Boards & Committees Support (Ongoing) $ 5,000
Financial Planning (New) $ 10,000
VITAL HABITATS PLAN
SAV Image Acquisition (New) $ 140,000
STEWARDSHIP PLAN
Citizens’ Monitoring Network (Ongoing) $ 56,000
NC Teaching Fellows (New) $ 6,000
Outreach (New) $ 1,173
TRAVEL $ 10,000
Total $ 502,600
* Estimate from EPA on April 12, 2006
** Includes: Fringe Benefits based on Social Security (7.65 %) & Retirement (6.82 %) of position’s annual salary and Medical
Insurance Plan rate of $3,748 per year and
Indirect Costs based on 3.8 % of salary.
41
V. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE (Match for FY 2007)
Summary of In-kind Match Requirement
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources intends to provide $492,600 as part
of the 1:1 non-federal match and $10,000 as part of the 1:1 non-federal match for the supplemental funds.
The match will be provided through:
1) In-kind services provided by staff of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Divisions of Water Quality and Forest Resources and the Office of Conservation and Community
Affairs.
2) Costs associated with the purchase of property for conservation purposes through funding of the NC
Clean Water Management Trust Fund.
Below is a list of the intended state match:
POSITION # SALARY EFFORT Match
OFFICE OF CONSERVATION & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (OCCA)
Env. Supervisor 1 82,179 .125 10,272
Admin. Assistant 1 37,090 .125 4636
Field Representative 1 59,441 0.75 44,581
Salary 1.0 59,489
Fringe 1.0 12,356
DIVISION of WATER QUALITY (Surface Water Protection)
Env. Specialist II 1 33,790 0.5 16,895
Salary 0.5 16,895
Fringe 0.5 4,319
DIVISION of FOREST RESOURCES (Water Quality Forester)
Service Forester II 1 37,129 0.5 18,565
Salary 0.5 18,565
Fringe 0.5 4,560
Total Salary 2 94,949
Total Fringe* 2 21,235
Total In-Kind Service Match: 116,184
* Fringe is based on Social Security (7.65 %) & Retirement (6.82 %) of position’s annual salary, plus Medical Insurance Plan
rate of $3,748 per year.
Implementation Match (In-Kind Services Descriptions)
Office of Conservation and Community Affairs
APNEP is located in the Office of Conservation and Community Affairs (OCCA). NC DENR’s Office of
Conservation and Community Affairs manages the One North Carolina Naturally initiative by leading the
development and implementation of a comprehensive statewide conservation plan involving government
agencies, private organizations, landowners and the public. Protecting the state’s open space areas in this
coordinated manner facilitates the more effective use of limited funding sources. OCCA also provides
support for development of regional open space plans, providing assistance through regional meetings and
resource materials.
42
The match positions are responsible for program administration, support, community involvement and
guiding implementation of the NC Coastal Habitat Protection Plan.
NC Division of Water Quality
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) in the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources is the agency responsible for statewide regulatory programs in surface water and aquifer
protection.
DWQ's mission is to preserve, protect and enhance North Carolina's surface water and groundwater
resources through quality monitoring programs, efficient permitting, responsible management, fair and
effective enforcement and excellence in public service.
The position is located in the Washington regional office and is responsible for water quality issues,
pollution control permits, permit compliance, evaluation of environmental quality/monitoring, and
enforcement actions for violations of environmental regulations. This position represents the Surface Water
Protection section.
􀂙􉥔 This position supports the CCMP’s Water Quality Plan, Goal: Restore, maintain or enhance water
quality in the Albemarle-Pamlico region so that it is fit for fish, wildlife and recreation.” and,
􀂙􉥔 The CCMP’s Water Quality Plan, Objective E, Management Action 1: “Continue to track and evaluate
indicators of environmental stress, including algal blooms, fish kills, and fish and shellfish diseases.”
Division of Forest Reseources
In August 2002, the "Forestry NPS Unit" was established within the Division's Forest Management Branch.
The organization is charged to develop and implement water quality projects that serve to minimize NPS
pollution from forest operations. The Unit also practices technology transfer through BMP related education
and training workshops and supports publications targeted at forest operators and forestland owners. Unit
staff also share a role in normal forest management and incident operations undertaken by the Division.
􀂙􉥔 This position supports the CCMP’s Water Quality Plan, Objective B, Management Action 1:
“Strengthen implementation of forestry best management practices through training, education,
technical assistance and enforcement.”
NC CLEAN WATER TRUST MANAGEMENT FUND
Created in 1996, the Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) provides grants to local governments,
state agencies and conservation non-profits to help finance projects that specifically address water pollution
problems. CWMTF funds projects that enhance or restore degraded waters, protect unpolluted waters,
and/or contribute toward a network of riparian buffers and greenways for environmental, educational, and
recreational benefits.
The following projects within the Albemarle-Pamlico region will be used for match.
Project Location/ River Basin Purpose Amount
Hughes Tract-Upper
Broad Creek
Text/ Neuse River Riparian conservation
easement (47 acres)
$ 386,416
Total $ 386,416
43
CWMTF Project Description
Hughes Tract-Upper Broad Creek
NC Coastal Land Trust, Acquisition/ Hughes Tract-Upper Broad Creek in the Neuse River Basin. Contract
is for $394,000 and is due to end on 4/30/07. Appraisals were received in April 2006. The project as
planned will protect through permanent conservation easements 130 acres along Broad Creek, an
anadromous fish spawning area. CWMTF funds will be used to purchase easement on 47 of the 130 acres.
Tract is in close proximity to other conservation lands. APNEP will use $386,416 as match for this grant as
a conservation purchase.
SUMMARY OF STATE MATCH
In-kind Positions (salaries and fringe): $ 116,184
Clean Water Management Trust Fund Projects: $ 386,416
TOTAL: $ 502,600
44
VI. TRAVEL
The EPA considers personal, face-to-face contact with peers and colleagues essential for information
sharing and technology transfer. As part of the federal grant, EPA provides APNEP with $10,000 allocated
as travel funds for program enhancement, education, and outreach support. These funds are to be used for
activities such as:
1) Presentations at or participation in national or regional NEP meetings
2) Presentations at or participation in workshops or conferences
3) Travel to other NEPs or communities to provide peer-to-peer technical assistance
4) Travel to other NEPs or watersheds for assistance
5) Travel by NEP staff or stakeholders from other NEPs or watershed programs to provide NEP with
assistance
6) Travel to national or international conferences to share information on the National Estuary Program
Stakeholders may include citizens, members of environmental or public interest organizations, business or
industry representatives, academicians, scientists or technical experts. As a requirement of this grant
agreement, members of the APNEP core staff are required to attend all meetings called on behalf of the
NEPs. These funds cannot be used to pay for travel of Federal employees.
FY 2006
During FY 2006, APNEP staff and citizen volunteers (STAC) attended a number of meetings and
conferences using the allotted travel funds. Travel may also be supported by specific project funds or
administration costs. Below is a summary of these activities:
Personnel Date Purpose Location Cost*
Crowell, Carpenter
& Giordano
10/05 EPA- ANEP/NEP
National Meeting
Newport, RI $ 3,000
Crowell, Giordano 12/05 NEP Region IV
Meeting
Atlanta, GA $ 1,000
Crowell 1/06 NEP Directors
Planning Meeting
Cocoa Beach, FL $ 500
Crowell 3/06 EPA- ANEP/NEP
National Meeting
Washington,
DC
$ 3,000
Crowell 5/06 LCREP
Implementation
Review
Portland, OR $ 1,000
Carpenter 5/06 National WQ
Monitoring Meeting
San Jose, CA $ 1,300
Staff 9/06 ANEP-EPA/NEP
National Meeting
San Francisco $ 2,000
APNEP Staff 10/05 to
9/ 2006
Normal Program
Activities
APNEP area $ 1,500
*Estimate
FY 2007 Projected Travel
All travel is allocated into three categories: In-State, Out-of-State, and EPA Required. All travel must be
consistent with NC DENR travel polices and procedures. Due to the dynamic nature of the NEP, we cannot
schedule all travel a year ahead: we can only provide an estimate based on established NC DENR rates
(below). Some travel is associated with specific projects, and travel costs are included in budgeted amounts.
45
In-State:
In-State travel is primarily for program staff to conduct routine business associated with APNEP
daily operations, staff training or topical meetings germane to the program. It may also cover non-staff
for NEP business (i.e. board and committee members, guest speakers, and experts). Rates are
listed below.
In-state estimate for FY 2007: 30 trips, among 4 staff members; average cost per trip approximately
$100. Total $3,000
Out-of-State:
Out-of-State travel is primarily for program staff to conduct business associated with the NEP, staff
training or topical meetings germane to the program. It may also cover non-staff (i.e. board and
committee members, guest speakers, experts) for NEP related activities. Rates are listed below.
Out-of-State Estimate for FY 2007: 2 trips, 2 days, average cost per trip approximately $500.00.
Total $1,000
EPA-required:
The NEP holds two national meetings each year (these may be in same fiscal year or not). Each
program is required to participate in the meetings. The Spring meeting is held in Washington, D.C.
and the fall meeting location rotates among the different NEP sites. The level of staff participation
will vary depending on the agenda for a particular meeting. Generally two members attend. It may
also cover non-staff (i.e. Board or Advisory Committee members).
Estimate for FY 2007: 2 trips, total, 3 persons --- average cost per trip per person is approximately
$1000.00 (based on prior travel). Total $6,000
46
NC DENR TRAVEL RATES (FY 2006)
Item In-State Out of State Overnight Trip Day Trip
Breakfast $ 7.00 $ 7.00 Leave Office before
6:00 AM
Leave Office before 6:00 AM;
Extend workday by 2 hours
Lunch $ 9.25 $ 9.25 Leave Office by
12:00 Noon;
Overnight return
after 2:00 PM
Never claimed on day trip
Dinner $ 15.75 $ 17.75 Depart office before 5:00 PM
Return after 8:00 PM
Extend workday by 3 hours
Breakfast/
Dinner
Leave office before 6:00 AM;
Return after 8:00 PM;
Extend workday by 5 hours
Hotel (+ taxes) $ 59.75 $ 71.00
FY 2007 Projected Travel
Personnel Date Purpose Location
Estimated
Cost
APNEP Staff &
volunteers
October to
September
Normal Program
Activities
Albemarle –
Pamlico Region
$ 3,000
APNEP Staff March
2007
NEP National
meeting
Washington, DC $ 3,000
APNEP Staff October to
September
National Meetings TBA $ 4,000
47
Attachment 1: Implementation Review Findings
Attachment 2: Executive Order #74
48
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
OCT 1 9 2005
OFFICE OF
WATER
Mr. Bill Crowell, Director Albemarle-Pamlico
National Estuary Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-3060
Dear Mr. Crowell:
The purpose of this letter is to provide a summary of the Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) 2005 Implementation Review (IR) and to thank you and the Albemarle-Pamlico National
Estuary Program (APNEP) staff, as well as your partners, who contributed to the 2005 IR report.
You put considerable effort into the implementation review submission and responses to our follow-up
questions. Thank you also for arranging the on-site visit by the IR Team and participating in the
associated meetings and field trips.
The implementation review process, now scheduled every three years, continues to prove to
be extremely valuable for determining each National Estuary Program's (NEP) progress and
effectiveness and thus, each program's funding eligibility. It has added considerably to EP A
Headquarters and Regional staff knowledge of each individual NEP, and will promote sharing of
effective and innovative initiatives and approaches across all 28 NEPs as well as with other
watershed programs around the country. EP A also is using the implementation review process to
assess how the NEPs support the core elements of the Clean Water Act (CW A), and to evaluate the
extent and effectiveness of the NEPs' contribution to achieving the goals in EPA's 2003 Strategic
Plan. The NEPs' efforts are particularly relevant to Goa14: Healthy Communities and Ecosystems,
Objective 4.3, Protect and Restore Ecosystems, and Goal 2: Clean and Safe Water, Objective 2.2,
Water Quality on a Watershed Basis.
This implementation review featured the participation of a volunteer ex-officio NEP
Director, Jan Smith, Director of the Massachusetts Bays Program (MBP) NEP. Jan's
participation provided the EPA team members with an NEP perspective of the perceived
strengths and challenges of the program undergoing the review. In addition, Jan shared ideas
from the MBP that should be useful for the APNEP.
Based on the IR Team's findings, we believe that the APNEP is continuing to make
significant progress in implementing its Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan
(CCMP). We are pleased to report that the APNEP "passes" the 2005 Implementation Review and
will be eligible for FY 2006, 2007 and 2008 funding authorized by the CW A §320. As provided
for in our FY 2006 budget appropriation for the NEP, we are providing $500,000 for FY 2006.
Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov
RecycledIRecyclable • Printed with Vegetable au Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Post consumer)
-
49
Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program 2005 Implementation Review Findings
Following is a summary of the key findings identified by the reviewers regarding the
APNEP strengths as well as some recommendations regarding potential areas for improvement.
The review comments are intended to recognize and applaud the Program's successes and support
efforts to further strengthen the Program. The Program's response to these recommendations will
be evaluated in the 2008 Implementation Review cycle.
Strengths
• Education and Outreach: The APNEP has effectively informed citizens about the value of
the watershed through several activities. Highlights include the APNEP's partnership with
North Carolina's Office of Environmental Education and Environmental Education Fund to
produce a week-long estuarine Teacher Training Institute; the APNEP's continued
participation in Estuary Live, a virtual field trip of the estuary; and a well attended day-long
symposium that featured CCMP implementation activities. Additional activities worth
noting include an enhanced APNEP website that is updated regularly and the quarterly
Beacon newsletter that provides useful information regarding the Program. This outreach
effectively informs the public about water quality, vital habitats, fisheries and habitat health
in the estuary, as well as how the public can help protect and restore these resources. It also
strengthens public awareness and raises support for the Program. The APNEP is also in the
process of developing a communication strategy that will identify its key audiences, develop
central messages, and target media to disseminate these messages. We look forward to
seeing the APNEP receive more regular coverage from leading television stations and
newspapers as its visibility and credibility grow in the watershed .
• Administrative Capacity: The APNEP has undertaken numerous actions that have
strengthened its ability to implement the Program's CCMP. The Program has increased its
independence and stature within North Carolina's Department of Environment and Natural
Resources by moving its location to the Office of Conservation and Community Affairs. It
has hired a new Director and has given him greater authority to manage the Program. It
has hired additional staff to augment its technical capacity and field-based watershed
coordination (including one based in Virginia). These changes have strengthened the
Program's presence throughout the watershed.
The appointment of a liaison between the APNEP and North Carolina's Division of
Coastal Management has improved the coordination between the two programs. A
Science and Technical Advisory Committee (ST AC) has been established, which will
accelerate the development and tracking of environmental indicators. In addition, the
APNEP is undertaking a strategic planning exercise and assessment of its governance
structure to help identify the appropriate roles, responsibilities, and activities of the
management conference participants. We look forward to seeing the APNEP further
2
50
advance its capacity by implementing the recommendations from these activities, such as
the new system to track CCMP implementation activities and conduct biennial evaluations
of its progress.
•
Active Participation in Clean Water Act (CW A) Core Programs: The APNEP has achieved
significant success in two key elements of the CW A: water quality monitoring and non-point
source pollution control. First, the Citizens Monitoring Network engages many citizen
groups in water quality monitoring and stewardship activities. Second, the APNEP was
instrumental in the development of a ferry-based monitoring program ("FerryMon") that
has become a model for other estuaries across the Nation and has implemented real-time
monitoring platforms in three of the river basins. Third, the APNEP has guided submerged
aquatic vegetation mapping and monitoring operations. Finally, the APNEP has worked
with the State's NonPoint Source Program to conduct workshops and develop outreach
materials for contractors on best management practices and clean marinas. We expect that
APNEP's support of these and other core water programs will increase through time.
Progress Made in the Areas Highlighted in the 2002 Implementation Review
• The APNEP has made substantial progress on each of the challenges noted in the 2002
Implementation Review. The Program staff, the Secretary and Deputy Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), the Director of DENR's
Office of Conservation and Community Affairs, and the Governor's office deserve
significant credit for this new direction. As noted earlier, the APNEP increased both the
visibility and autonomy of the Program office as well as the number of Program staff. In
addition, the APNEP has effectively utilized its EP A Section 320 funds since the 2002
Implementation Review.
• The on-going efforts to restructure the management conference of the APNEP are
noteworthy. These efforts to create a structure that reflects the NEP's broad group of
stakeholders and the key resource and decision-making partners should benefit the
continuing implementation of the CCMP. Your cooperation and coordination with EPA
during the drafting of the new Governor's Executive Order to establish the revised structure
is very much appreciated.
Challenges
CCMP Update and Changes in Priorities: Although the APNEP intends to update its
CCMP, the Program has not yet developed a timetable or process for doing this. We
recommend that the APNEP develop a process that includes a timetable and milestones.
The APNEP should include necessary actions, information needs, and support mechanisms
in the revised CCMP. The APNEP should consider identifying an interim
. set of priorities, as well as a mechanism to add to and modify these actions, that takes into
account factors affecting environmental issues relevant to the estuaries and sounds.
3
51
•
Visibility: The APNEP’s location within a state agency presents challenges in terms of its
ability to appear visible and independent. In order for the APNEP to be seen as inherently
autonomous the Program must bet and must be perceived to be, independent of any particular
interest group or agency. The Director needs to be able to respond to and act on committee
recommendations independent of state agency activities. The APNEP may consider an
approach that the Massachusetts Bays Program (MBP) took to enhance its visibility and
autonomy. The MBP completed an update of its CCMP that all partners - non-profits,
citizens and state agencies - helped craft. The update carefully spelled out which activities
each party was responsible fort including specific tasks for the MBP staff, and provided a
clear definition of what the MBP staff should be doing. The update, after formal adoption by
the Management Committee, formed the basis of future priorities and Program direction. In
addition, the Program should strive to take a leadership role when possible and assert itself as
an equal partner in joint ventures. The Program should also strive for recognition when
engaged in key activities.
•
Partnerships and Fundraising: The APNEP’s extensive watershed (30,000 square miles)
presents numerous challenges. Limited resources constrain the APNEP’s ability to impact the
watershed. This underlines the importance of strategic stakeholder alliances and effective
flu}d-raising efforts. To obtain additional resources for CCMP implementation, the APNEP
should develop a strategy that identifies funding needs and alternatives, and provides for
diversifying its sources of funding to supplement existing funds. As part of that strategy, the
APNEP should work with local governments to secure at least a minimal annual contribution
from them to support the APNEP's work. EP A HQ is prepared to assist the Program in this
activity.
•
Environmental Indicators/Monitoring Plan: Although an ad-hoc Science Technical
Advisory Committee (8T AC) work group has drafted and submitted an initial set of
environmental indicators to EP A, and a two-day indicator workshop was scheduled for
August 2005, the APNEP remains without a monitoring plan framework. The 8TAC work
group should begin to develop a comprehensive monitoring strategy and plan, taking into
account previous efforts. This plan should include the continuation of the existing monitoring
program for the Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system and sounds that is a part of EPA's
National Coastal Assessment (NCA). APNEP needs to identify an ongoing source of funding
for that effort. We believe it, would be most appropriate for the state of North Carolina to
provide funding for the North Carolina component of the NCA. In addition, the plan should
be based on the concept of long-term status and trends monitoring or the identification of
temporal trends or changes over time. The Program should work with all appropriate
government agencies (federalt state, and local) and other stakeholders in the Albemarle-
Pamlico region to develop estuarine and freshwater monitoring and indicators. The Program
should complete the development and approval of environmental indicators by the end of
2005, in conjunction with the development of the monitoring plan scheduled for 2006.
4
52
• Environmental Progress: The APNEP protected or restored nearly 38,500 acres of habitat
over the 2002-2004 period. This is a significant accomplishment and represents more
acreage of habitat protected or restored than any other NEP in Region IV. Yet, the APNEP
reports no or very little data regarding "environmental trends" in the estuarine system and
its watersheds. Status and trends data are key to evaluating program impacts and results
and can be used to send a powerful message to citizens, stakeholders, and elected officials.
The Program should identify existing and develop long-term environmental data sets, and
use the information to report on environmental progress. The information can also be used
to increase support and funding for implementation of the CCMP and for public outreach
efforts.
Thank you again for participating in the implementation review process. We welcome any
additional thoughts you may have either about the review process itself or about EP A's
involvement in the APNEP's CCMP implementation. If you have any questions or comments,
please contact me or Darrell Brown, Chief, Coastal Management Branch, at telephone number
(202) 566-1256.
cc:
Bill Ross, NCDENR
Dempsey Benton, NCDENR
Robin Smith, NCDENR
Richard Rogers, NCDENR
Jan Smith, Massachusetts Bays NEP
Diane Regas, U.S. EP A
Craig Hooks, U.S. EPA
Craig Vogtt, U.S. EP A
Darrell Brown, U.S. EPA
Jim Giattina, U.S. EP A Region lV
Tom Welborn, U.S. EP A Region N
Bo Crum, U.S. EP A Region IV
Fred McManus, U.S. EPA Region IV
Bob Howard, U.S. EPA Region IV
Tim Jones, U.S. EPA
Noemi Mercado, U.S. EP A
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74

1
ANNUAL WORK PLAN
for the
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AND
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM
OCTOBER 1, 2006 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
Approved by
APNEP Policy Board on
June 15, 2006
CE-97464802
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 4
BACKGROUND 5
MAP: Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Region
EPA IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW 2005 6
ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND ONGOING PROJECTS FOR FY 2006 8
I. PROGRAM REFORM 8
II. FY 2006 ACTIONS & PROJECTS 9
III. FY 2005 ACTIONS & PROJECTS 16
IV. FY 2004 ACTIONS & PROJECTS 18
V. FY 2003 ACTIONS & PROJECTS 21
VI. FY 2002 WATERSHED DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS 22
ONGOING LONGTERM PROJECTS & ACTIONS 25
I. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring/ Mapping
II. EPA Supported Nonpoint Source Pollution Related Restoration Project
III. Program Administration
IV. Virginia Watershed Field Coordinator
V. Citizens’ Monitoring Network
VI. Program Enhancements Relating to Smithfield Foods Agreement
VII. Other Projects
3
PROJECTS & ACTIONS FOR FY 2007 30
Program Administration
VA Watershed Field Coordinator
Board & Committees Support
Financial Planning
SAV Mapping
Citizens’ Monitoring Network
NC Teaching Fellows
Outreach Activities
Web Site
EstuaryLive!
ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL 34
I. APNEP PERSONNEL 34
II. GRANTS TO LOCAL ENTITIES 36
Table 37
III. LEVERAGE FUNDS 39
IV. ESTIMATED FEDERAL COST SHARE (Budget for FY 2007) 40
V. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE (Match for FY 2007) 41
VI. TRAVEL 44
4
INTRODUCTION
Contents of this document:
􀂃􈍁 A progress report detailing accomplishments in FY 2006 is provided on pages 8 through 29.
􀂃􈍔 The FY 2007 Work Plan and budget items are presented on pages 30 through 33.
􀂃􈍁 Administrative and financial information items are presented on pages 34 through 46.
Purpose: The purpose of this agreement is to provide support to the NC Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) from the US Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) for continuing demonstration of implementation of the unique management strategies
recommended in the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program’s (APNEP) Comprehensive
Conservation and Management Plan and support for the APNEP Mission to identify, restore and
protect the resources of the region. This agreement represents a funding increase for the amount
of $502,600 and time extension to September 30, 2008 for Cooperative Agreement #CE-
97464802.
Period of Performance:
The period of performance under this agreement is from October 1, 2006 through September 30,
2008.
Principal Contacts:
EPA Project Officer APNEP Director
Fred McManus Bill Crowell
US EPA Region IV Albemarle-Pamlico NEP
61 Forsyth Street 1601 Mail Service Center
Atlanta, GA 30303 Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
(404) 562 – 9385 (919) 715 - 1327
5
BACKGROUND
The Albemarle and Pamlico Sounds represent the nation’s largest lagoonal estuarine system.
The system is composed of seven sounds and five major river basins draining over 30,000
square miles of watershed in northeastern North Carolina and southeastern Virginia. The
sounds, rivers, creeks, wetlands and terrestrial areas provide habitat for an abundance of animal
and plant species. People depend on the system for residential and resort development, food,
recreation, mining, forestry, agriculture, business and industry.
The Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program (APNEP), a part of the US Environmental
Protection Agency’s National Estuary Program (NEP) since 1987, developed a Comprehensive
Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) that was ratified by the Governor of North
Carolina and approved by the US EPA in November 1994. The CCMP is intended as a
practical, cost-effective and equitable approach to managing the valuable resources of the
Albemarle-Pamlico region.
The Program is located in the Office of Conservation and Community Affairs within the NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources with program personnel in Raleigh,
Washington, and Greenville, NC and Suffolk, VA.
6
EPA IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW 2005
EPA Implementation Review Response
The EPA conducted an Implementation Review with NC DENR and APNEP staff between
March and June 2005.
An October 19, 2005 letter stated that the EPA found that the APNEP continues to make
“significant progress” in implementing its CCMP and determined that the APNEP “passed”
the 2005 Implementation Review and will be eligible for FY 2006, 2007 and 2008 funding
authorized by the Clean Water Act §320. A copy of the EPA review letter is attached at the
end of this Work Plan.
The EPA review identified the following challenges:
CCMP Update and Changes in Priorities: Develop a process or timetable for CCMP
update and priority evaluation. The EPA recommends that the APNEP develop a
process that includes a timetable and milestones. The revised CCMP should include
necessary actions, information needs, and support mechanisms. The APNEP should
consider identifying an interim set of priorities, as well as a mechanism to add to and
modify these actions, that takes into account factors affecting environmental issues
relevant to the estuaries and sounds.
􀂃􈍁 APNEP will be developing a process with the Policy Board for updating the
CCMP in FY 2007.
Visibility: The APNEP’s location within a state agency presents challenges in terms of
its ability to appear visible and independent. In order for the APNEP to be seen as
inherently autonomous the Program must be, and must be perceived to be, independent
of any particular interest group or agency. The Director needs to be able to respond to
and act on committee recommendations independent of state agency activities. In
addition, the Program should strive to take a leadership role when possible and assert
itself as an equal partner in joint ventures. The Program should also strive for
recognition when engaged in key activities.
􀂃􈍁 APNEP continues to develop partnerships and increase its visibility in
watershed and estuarine issues. The CCMP update will provide for an
opportunity to facilitate greater involvement and understanding about the
program and the CCMP.
Partnerships and Fundraising: The APNEP’s extensive watershed (30,000 square
miles) presents numerous challenges. Limited resources constrain the program’s ability
to impact the watershed. This underlines the importance of strategic stakeholder
alliances and effective fund-raising efforts. To obtain additional resources for CCMP
implementation, the APNEP should develop a strategy that identifies funding needs and
alternatives, and provide for diversifying its sources of funding to supplement existing
funds. As part of that strategy, the APNEP should work with local governments to
7
secure at least a minimal annual contribution from them to support the APNEP's work.
EPA is prepared to assist the Program in this activity.
􀂃􈍁 APNEP will develop a plan to obtain additional resources with the
assistance of the EPA as proposed in this work plan. EPA will provide
$10,000 dollars to support this action.
Environmental Indicators/Monitoring Plan: The STAC work group should begin to
develop a comprehensive monitoring strategy and plan, taking into account previous
efforts. This plan should include the continuation of the existing monitoring program
for the Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system and sounds that is a part of EPA's National
Coastal Assessment (NCA). APNEP needs to identify an ongoing source of funding for
that effort. We believe it would be most appropriate for the state of North Carolina to
provide funding for the North Carolina component of the NCA. In addition, the plan
should be based on the concept of long-term status and trends monitoring or the
identification of temporal trends or changes over time. The Program should work with
all appropriate government agencies (federal, state, and local) and other stakeholders in
the Albemarle-Pamlico region to develop estuarine and freshwater monitoring and
indicators.
􀂃􈍁 APNEP will continue on its present course to develop a comprehensive
monitoring strategy, albeit on a schedule that has indicators by the end of
2006, and a monitoring plan in 2007. The last half of 2006 will see a
transition from indicator development being a STAC-driven exercise to a
more balanced exercise that reflects more policy and citizen input.
Consistent with recommendations in the draft NEP indicator development
strategy (issued April 2006), the proposed mechanism for achieving this
balance is through the creation of an “Indicator Steering Committee” with
representation from the STAC, Policy Board, and Citizens Advisory
Committee.
Environmental Progress: The APNEP protected or restored nearly 38,500 acres of
habitat over the 2002-2004 period. This is a significant accomplishment and represents
more acreage of habitat protected or restored than any other NEP in Region IV. Yet, the
APNEP reports no or very little data regarding "environmental trends" in the estuarine
system and its watersheds. Status and trends data are key to evaluating program impacts
and results and can be used to send a powerful message to citizens, stakeholders, and
elected officials. The Program should identify existing and develop long-term
environmental data sets, and use the information to report on environmental progress.
The information can also be used to increase support and funding for implementation of
the CCMP and for public outreach efforts.
􀂃􈍁 APNEP will continue to inventory past and current long-term environmental
monitoring projects and programs in the APNEP region. Data from many
such monitoring activities will be documented in the monitoring plan and
likely assessed in APNEP’s future “state of the environment” publications.
8
ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND ONGOING PROJECTS FOR FY 2006
Activities for FY 2006 continued to be focused on program improvement and rejuvenation, and
coordination with the new Policy Board & Committees for CCMP implementation, as well as
demonstration, educational and outreach activities.
It should be noted that demonstration projects for FY 2006 have had several delays related to
the “Requests for Proposals” process and in contracting with various parties. It is anticipated
that most projects will be completed by December 31, 2006. The status of each project is
presented within this Work Plan.
Activities and accomplishments from October 1, 2005 through June 1, 2006, are summarized
below:
I. PROGRAM REFORM
Executive Order #74
On May 16th, 2005, North Carolina Governor Michael F. Easley signed Executive Order
# 74: Creation of A Program Office, A Policy Board, and Advisory Committees to Support
Natural Resource And Environmental Management in the Albemarle-Pamlico National
Estuarine System. This Executive Order is essential to the future of the APNEP and was
developed after more than two years of program review and assessment, and stakeholder
participation. This Executive Order provides the operational framework for the program. A
copy of Executive Order #74 is attached at the end of this Work Plan.
Program Office
The Executive Order establishes an Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program
Office to coordinate and facilitate the implementation and advancement of the CCMP,
the APNEP mission, and the activities of the Policy Board and Advisory Committees.
The APNEP Program Office will serve as a conduit for information between the Policy
Board, Advisory Committees, state and federal agencies, local government, tribes,
academia and the public. Additionally, the Executive Order states that the Program
Office will be located in the Offices of the Secretary of the North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural Resources.
Policy Board
A Policy Board for the Albemarle-Pamlico watershed is established by the Executive
Order to work with DENR and the Program Office to support, evaluate, update,
advocate and guide the implementation of the CCMP and the APNEP mission. The role
of the Policy Board is to guide, evaluate and support the CCMP implementation process
and advance the CCMP and its management actions, and to ensure the highest level of
collaboration, coordination and cooperation among state and federal agencies, local
governments, the public and various interest groups. The Policy Board will consult
with the Advisory Committees and the Program Office for recommendations pertaining
to implementation of CCMP management actions at the regional and local level, and the
9
coordination and development of research and monitoring priorities. A major duty of
the Policy Board is to evaluate the relevance of the CCMP and to make
recommendations on amending it to address new or emerging issues that may affect the
significant natural resources of the Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system. Additionally,
the Policy Board, in cooperation with the Program Office, will develop an annual report,
budget and work plan. The Policy Board held its first meeting on October 31, 2005.
Advisory Committees
The Executive Order establishes three advisory committees to assist the Policy Board in
guiding the APNEP and CCMP implementation.
A Committee of Citizen Advisors ("Citizen Advisory Committee") is established
to advise and support the Policy Board, and to serve as a liaison to local agencies
and interested parties regarding environmental and natural resource management
concerns and issues relevant to implementation of the CCMP and the APNEP
mission. The Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) held its first meeting on
January 20, 2006.
A Committee of Management Agency Representatives ("Management Advisory
Committee") is established to facilitate and support the implementation and
advancement of the CCMP management actions, and the APNEP mission. The
Management Advisory Committee (MAC) should be established by September
31, 2006.
A Committee of Science and Technical Advisors ("Science and Technical
Advisory Committee") is established to advise the Policy Board and agencies
responsible for implementation of the CCMP on scientific and technical issues.
The Science and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) continues to meet
quarterly.
II. FY 2006 ACTIONS & PROJECTS
The following are ongoing or completed actions since October 1, 2005.
Program Administration
For more detail see Administration and Financial, and Ongoing Projects sections.
Status: Ongoing
Output: Program administration, partnership building, and CCMP
implementation
Outcome: See specific projects
Estimated Cost: $250,366
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
10
Watershed Field Coordinator - Virginia
For more detail see Ongoing Projects section.
Status: Ongoing
Output: Program administration, partnership building, and CCMP
implementation
Outcome: Increased presence of APNEP in Virginia, new Chowan
Watershed Roundtable
Estimated Cost: $30,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Board and Committees Support
Support activities for the Board and advisory committees, printing, meeting support, etc.
Status: Ongoing
Output: Partnership building, outreach, CCMP implementation
prioritization
Outcome: New and greater public involvement, estuarine indicator
development
Estimated Cost: $10,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Demonstration Projects
Proposals were solicited for demonstration projects to provide environmental benefits in
the Albemarle-Pamlico region. Results of the demonstration projects will be
transferable to other National Estuary Programs. Project selection was made by the
Citizen Advisory Committee on April 7, 2006.
Carteret Community College Shoreline Restoration Project
This project will engage at risk youth through hands-on learning and community
mentoring partnerships that allow them to understand the value of wetlands,
clean estuaries, and environmental stewardship, resulting in the direct restoration
of a shoreline fronting Bogue Sound at Carteret Community College. The
project will rely on partnerships between the North Carolina Coastal Federation
(NCCF), Carteret Community College (CCC), APNEP, the Boys and Girls Club
of America (BGC), and citizen volunteers.
Status: Pending Contract
Intended Output: Involvement of 40 at-risk youth from the local Boys and
Girls Club, and 20 community volunteers. College
students will serve as mentors to the youth and community
volunteers will assist both groups with the wetland
planting.
Intended Outcome: Restore .25 acres of wetlands. Additional outreach
activities will reach an estimated 500,000 individuals.
Estimated Cost: $ 20,978
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: $ 7,570
11
Perquimans County High School Constructed Wetland and
Environmental Education Project, Phase II
This project is a collaborative venture led by the Perquimans County Schools
to improve an outdoor education program for 570 high school science
students, their teachers and the local community. The proposed project would
build on the successful first stage of the Jennie’s Gut Constructed Wetlands
Project, funded in part with a 2005 grant from APNEP. The proposed project
would improve outdoor teaching and learning opportunities by replacing a
pedestrian bridge to allow greater water flow.
Status: Pending Contract
Intended Output: Educational wetland, public involvement.
Intended Outcome: Reduction in sediments, nutrients and toxicants from
nonpoint sources, improvement of water quality for a
town and community, improved water flow
Estimated Cost: $ 11,400
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: $ 2,000
Williamston High School Low Impact Development Project
This project will install several examples of Low Impact Development (LID)
practices on the site of Williamston High School in Martin County, NC. The
integrated management practices of a cistern, level spreader, vegetative
buffer, bioretention, rain gardens and permeable pavement will help treat
runoff from the school site before it enters the Roanoke Basin watershed. The
practices will be used to educate students, officials, and citizens of the
importance of integrated management practices and how they can be used at
the residential and commercial levels to treat runoff.
Status: Pending Contract
Intended Output: Demonstration BMPs installed
Intended Outcome: Reduce erosion and untreated stormwater runoff,
improved water quality; reduction in the amount of
treated municipal water used for landscaping and other
non-potable uses
Estimated Cost: $ 25,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: Pending
Red Mill Elementary School Riparian Buffer Project and Environmental
Education Center, VA
This project will construct a 35-foot riparian buffer zone adjoining Red Mill
Elementary School, and develop an education program with displays and
outdoor classroom facilities.
12
Status: Pending Contract
Intended Output: Education program with displays
Intended Outcome: A 35-foot riparian buffer zone
Estimated Cost: $ 25,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: $ 17,000
Manteo Middle School Stormwater Demonstration Project
Students, teachers, and volunteers will plant rain gardens in an area designed
to catch stormwater from the school’s parking lots and roof. Information on
stormwater pollution and control will be incorporated into the science
curriculum, and signs will inform the public about stormwater problems and
control.
Status: Pending Contract
Intended Output: Two landscaped rain gardens with native plants, with
signs explaining stormwater runoff and the need to
control it, greater student awareness of effects of
stormwater
Intended Outcome: Improved stormwater management
Estimated Cost: $ 14,500
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: $ 7,340
Wet and Wild: Utilizing the Wet Detention Pond at P.S. Jones Middle
School as an Outdoor Classroom
This project proposes the creation of an outdoor classroom in and around a two-acre
wet detention pond that has been constructed on the 88-acre tract of land on
which P.S. Jones Middle School and John Small Elementary School are being
built. Grant funds will be used to design and construct a wheelchair-accessible
observation platform and pier overlooking the detention pond to provide students
and teachers with opportunities for scientific study, observation, and data
collection. Grant funds will also be used to purchase and introduce plants
selected for their documented ability to uptake and/or degrade toxins in pond
water.
Status: Project pending feasibility review by NC Cooperative
Extension
Intended Output: Boardwalk, outdoor classroom
Intended Outcome: Improved stormwater management, vegetation, greater
student awareness of effects of stormwater
Estimated Cost: $ 25,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Estimated Leverage: Pending
13
Other Projects
Funds budgeted in this category were used to supplement the demonstration projects in
Virginia.
Status: Allocated to FY 2006 Demonstration Projects (VA) – in progress
Estimated Cost: $12,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Mapping
APNEP plans to continue leading the NC/VA SAV mapping project. The SAV
workgroup is currently developing the plans for the next round of flights. See
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring in Ongoing Projects for more
information.
Status: Ongoing project
(Note: FY 2006 funds have not been contracted to date)
Output: Reports and GIS data, better management of SAV resources
Outcome: New management actions to protect SAV resources
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Leverage: Pending
Citizens’ Monitoring Network
For more detail see Ongoing Projects section.
Status: Ongoing
Output: Data, citizen involvement
Outcome: Increased knowledge on status of local waters
Estimated Cost: $56,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
2006 Teacher Institute
APNEP will partner with the Office of Environmental Education and the Environmental
Education Fund to offer a teacher training institute at the Trinity Center in Salter Path,
NC. Approximately 20 teachers will be provided with curriculum training in earth /
environmental sciences with hands-on activities, site visits, and specific content to
support inquiry, experiential, and research-based instruction on estuary and water
resources. The dates for the institute are July 30, 2006 - August 3, 2006.
Status: In progress
Intended Output: 20 teachers exposed to environmental education opportunities
Intended Outcome: Increased environmental education in schools
Estimated Cost: $22,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
14
Outreach Activities and Web Site
APNEP continues to develop a greater capacity of outreach and community
involvement, including web site updates and redesign. The APNEP web site
(www.apnep.org) will continue to disseminate information about the mission and goals
of the NEP and provide information on progress of CCMP implementation. The
APNEP web site also carries past issues of The Beacon.
Status: In progress
Output: Newsletters, press releases, posters, and web site
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness, implementation of CCMP
Estimated Cost: $ 1,600
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006 and NC DENR support
Local Government Survey
In order to assess the status of the current relationship and potential for greater local
involvement, APNEP contracted for local governments to be interviewed to assess
needs that can be addressed by APNEP program actions. The contractor met with
representatives of county governments and Councils of Government to determine
needs related to implementation of the CCMP.
Status: Complete
Output: 20 local governments reached, reports
Outcome: Better understanding of local government issues
Estimated Cost: $6,000
Funding Source: NC DENR
Leverage: $6,000
Estuary Live! Spring 2006
APNEP partnered with the NC National Estuarine Research Reserve and others to offer
interactive field trips for students from North Carolina and throughout the world.
Status: Complete
Output: 4 days of broadcast
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 500
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2003
Leverage: $9,000
CHPP Implementation Booklet
APNEP partnered with the NC Coastal NPS Program and NC DENR to develop an
informational booklet highlighting the Coastal Habitat Protection Plan (CHPP) to assist
NC DENR in its outreach efforts.
Status: Complete
Output: CHPP implementation booklet
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $6,681
15
Funding Source: NC Coastal NPS Program
Leverage: $6,681
CHPP Posters
APNEP again partnered with the NC Coastal NPS Program and NC DENR to develop
information to assist in the CHPP outreach effort. Staff worked to develop a set of
general habitat posters.
Status: Complete
Output: CHPP Implementation posters
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 3,000
Funding Source: NC Coastal NPS Program
Leverage: $ 3,000
Legislative Oyster Roast
APNEP participated in an oyster roast held for legislators on Wednesday, May 24th 2006
to draw attention to efforts to restore oyster habitats along the coast and the North
Carolina Oyster Restoration and Protection Action Plan: A Blueprint for Action.
Status: Complete
Output: Legislative oyster roast, media event
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $11,000
Funding Source: NC Coastal Federation, The Nature Conservancy, NCDENR and
others
Leverage: $11,000
Albemarle-Chowan Watershed Roundtable
The APNEP partnered with the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation to
lead the formation of an Albemarle-Chowan Watershed Roundtable on March 29, 2006.
The initial meeting focused on the “state of the watershed” and opportunities to move
forward with grant proposals to secure additional resources. Small group discussions
centered on outreach/education, planning and research, and implementation.
Status: Ongoing
Output: Citizen advisory group
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness and citizen participation
Estimated Cost: Pending
Funding Source: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation
Leverage: Pending
16
Regional Wetlands Grant: Development of a Comprehensive Assessment and Tracking
Methodology for Wetland Functionality in the Chowan Estuary of Western Albemarle
Sound
APNEP partnered with Environmental Defense to obtain a Regional Wetlands Grant from the
EPA to develop a comprehensive assessment methodology for wetland functionality in the
Chowan Estuary of Western Albemarle Sound, as the basis for setting goals for wetland extent
and condition, developing programs to achieve those goals, and tracking progress. The work
will be used to prioritize short-term actions, and as an integral part of the long-term
implementation plans for state and federal resource management in the region.
Status: In Progress
Output: A comprehensive assessment methodology for wetland functionality
Outcome: Greater wetland restoration and conservation
Estimated Cost: $1,013,968
Funding Source: EPA and Environmental Defense funds for Regional Wetland Grant
Leverage: $1,013,968
III.FY 2005 ACTIONS & PROJECTS
The following are ongoing or completed actions from the FY 2005 Work Plan since October
1, 2005.
Conservation Assessment for the Albemarle-Pamlico Region, Phase II
The NC Natural Heritage Program is working to identify owners of lands which contain
Significant Natural Heritage Areas identified during the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study
from 1989 to 1993, and to meet with the landowners to inform them of the ecological
significance of their lands and to encourage their wise stewardship of their properties.
Project builds upon FY 2003 project.
Status: In Progress
Output: Data, report
Outcome: Conservation easements or other land protection
Estimated Cost: $12,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2005
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Mapping (Ongoing)
See Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring in Ongoing Projects for more
information.
Status: In Progress (Phase II)
Output: Reports and GIS data, better management of SAV resources
Outcome: New management actions to protect SAV resources
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2005
Leverage: Funds were directly linked to $20,000 from the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission in contracted project. Additional leverage is pending.
17
Conservation Assessment for the Chowan River Basin in Virginia
APNEP is working with the Virginia Natural Heritage Program to conduct a conservation
assessment to identify each habitat type of conservation concern within the region of study.
The goal of this project is to improve our knowledge of the conservation needs of
Virginia’s Chowan River basin’s natural heritage resources and develop better conservation
targets.
Status: Complete
Output: GIS Data, report
Outcome: Greater understanding of habitat types of conservation concern
Estimated Cost: $15,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2005
Wetlands Assessment and Mapping for the Chowan River Basin
APNEP is partnering with the Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences and others to conduct a
riparian wetlands survey /assessment along the Chowan River. This process will lead to the
development of GIS data layers of the various wetland habitats. Collected data identifies
shoreline use, condition, natural habitat environments, and anthropogenic modifications
to the shoreline that may impact habitat viability.
Status: Complete
Output: GIS Data, report
Outcome: Greater understanding of wetland status along the Chowan River
Estimated Cost: $30,196
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2005
Leverage: Pending
Estuary Live! Fall 2005
APNEP planned to partner with the NC National Estuarine Research Reserve to offer
interactive field trips for students from North Carolina and throughout the world. The
broadcast was canceled due to effects of Hurricane Ophelia.
Status: Canceled
Estimated Cost: $ 0
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2003
Under Served Communities – Estuarine Education
APNEP is working with various partners to develop a pilot program in two elementary
schools (grades K-4) in the APNEP region to assist students and their families in learning
new skills and developing new abilities to enhance their understanding of their connections
to the estuary and the environment.
Status: Pending additional funds
Estimated Cost: $8,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2005
18
IV. FY 2004 PROJECTS
The following are ongoing or completed actions from the FY 2004 Work Plan since October
1, 2005.
EPA Financial Planning – Program Development
This project was identified in the FY 2004 work plan to be addressed as funding became
available. As APNEP reevaluates its structure, staff and Board members will work with
EPA staff to identify and develop strategies for leveraging funds beyond EPA grant funds.
EPA staff / contractor will lead this effort. Staff will work with the EPA and the Policy
Board or Citizen Advisory Committee to develop the meeting. EPA has made funding
available for planning in FY 2007.
Status: New
Intend Output: Report, public involvement
Intended Outcome: Additional resources for CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $10,000
Funding Source: EPA supplemental funds for Financial Planning in FY 2007
Atlantic White Cedar Restoration Project
The NC Division of Coastal Management / Coastal Reserves planned to replant
approximately 38 acres of forested wetlands with native hardwood species, cypress, and
Atlantic White Cedar at the Preyer-Buckridge Coastal Reserve in winter 2004, but heavy
rains and flooding have delayed site preparation and replanting. Staff now plan to install a
tide gate to reduce the effects of saltwater intrusion.
Status: Pending
Intend Output: Report, data
Intended Outcome: Habitat restoration
Estimated Cost: $16,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Demonstration Projects with Virginia
In an effort to further build partnerships with resource agencies and others in both NC and
VA, at least one demonstration project will be developed in the shared river basins.
Status: In Progress - Funds were applied to FY 2006 School Yard Demonstration
Projects in Virginia.
Estimated Cost: $10,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
19
FY 2005 School Yard Demonstration Projects
School Yard Demonstration Projects were solicited in each of the river basins to provide
environmental and educational benefits in the Albemarle-Pamlico region.
Student Wetland Nursery Program
The Student Wetland Nursery Program engages students through hands on projects that
enable them to understand the value of wetlands, resulting in the direct restoration of
wetlands and continued stewardship of valuable coastal resources. Through this project,
students will learn about wetlands and stormwater, construct wetland nurseries on the
school grounds, cultivate wetland grasses, and then use these grasses to help restore a
wetland area in the Neuse Watershed.
Status: In Progress
Output: Classroom instruction for two middle school science classes
(representing at least 50 students and teachers), conduct seed
experiments in each classroom to generate 1,000 wetland plants,
construct two wetland nurseries at two schools for cultivation of
at least 4,000 additional plants (for a total of 5,000 plants), public
outreach, assist students to plant wetland grasses at restoration
sites, restoring at least one half acre of wetlands. Produce and air
a half-hour cable access show available to 500,000 households.
Outcome: Two wetland nurseries at two schools, planting of 5,000 wetland
plants, restoring at least one half acre of wetlands. Project
knowledge due to a half-hour cable access show detailing the
student wetland nursery project.
Estimated Cost: $13,210
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Leverage: $ 5,000
Washington Montessori School Bio-Swale
Washington Montessori constructed a bio-filter (bio-swale) stormwater treatment system
to address excess run off from the roof and gravel parking lot. The system will not only
be sufficient for the current 8,000 square foot building, but for future school building
expansions as well.
Status: Complete
Output: A bio-filter (bio-swale) stormwater treatment system to address
excess run off from the roof and gravel parking lot.
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness for students, teachers and
parents, on-site stormwater treatment
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
20
Northampton Outdoor Learning Center Nature Trail
The Northampton Nature Trail provides students with hands on learning as well as an
outdoor learning environment for environmental education. The restored barrow area
will serve as the orientation site for the nature trail classroom. The APNEP grant funds
were used to construct a teaching shelter and a handicap accessible boardwalk onto an
island that exists at a natural pond on the trail site. The Outdoor Learning Center is a
short distance from a new K-5 elementary school site.
Status: Complete
Output: Nature trail, boardwalk, and signage
Outcome: Environmental education facility and nature trail, increased
environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Leverage: Pending
Gates County High School Outdoor Environmental Learning Site
This project is a collaborative venture led by Gates County Public Schools to plan
and construct a boardwalk, bridge and observation platform which will enhance
science teaching and learning for 640 high school students and their teachers and
increase environmental awareness for the general public of Gates County.
Status: In Progress
Intended Output: Boardwalk, bridge and observation platform, riparian buffer,
enhanced science teaching and learning for 640 high school
students and their teachers, and increased environmental
awareness for the general public of Gates County.
Intended Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 17,215
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Estimated Leverage: $ 1,000
J.E.J. Moore Outdoor Classroom and Nature Trail
This project built an outdoor classroom equipped with an educational kiosk and
seating for 35 students, as well as interpretive signs along a nature trail in a wooded
wetland area.
Status: Complete
Output: Trail, signage, outdoor classroom
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $10,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Estimated Leverage: $ 5,500
21
Perquimans County High School Constructed Wetland and Environmental
Education Project
This project is a collaborative venture led by the Perquimans County Public Schools
to re-shape and restore a natural wetlands located on the grounds of Perquimans
High School, to construct an access boardwalk, bridges and observation deck, and to
use the restored accessible wetland as the basis for an outdoor education program for
570 high school science students and their teachers.
Status: Complete
Output: Report, wetland, and environmental awareness
Outcome: Restored wetland, increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
Mini-grants
Status: Reallocated to FY 2006 Demonstration Projects
Estimated Cost: $4,000 - funds were allocated to FY 2006 Demonstration Projects
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2004
V. FY 2003 PROJECTS
The following are ongoing or completed actions from the FY 2003 Work Plan since October
1, 2005.
Comprehensive Monitoring Plan
The APNEP Science Coordinator is coordinating the activities associated with development
of the indicators and the monitoring strategy. The Science Coordinator has reviewed work
efforts previously completed by the program and has conducted meetings with other DENR
agency staff to gather information on existing and proposed monitoring programs and
projects. The APNEP Science Coordinator, STAC and DENR agency staff will continue to
address this task in FY 2007.
Status: In Progress
Intended Output: Plan
Intended Outcome: Enhanced environmental monitoring
Estimated Cost: $3,000
Funding Source: Unencumbered EPA funds from previous years as necessary
22
Other Projects
The APNEP worked to develop partnerships to implement projects that support the mission
of the APNEP and implementation of the CCMP.
NC Division of Forest Resources (DFR) Forestry BMP Manual Revision
Project to support NC DFR to produce and distribute (via workshops and
direct mail-out) the Manual to select forest operators and forestland owners
located in the five APNEP River Basins.
Status: In Progress
Output: BMP Manual
Outcome: Increased use and awareness of forestry BMPs
Funding Source: Unencumbered EPA funds from previous years as
necessary
Funding: $15,000
Leverage: Pending
VI. FY 2002 WATERSHED DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
Funds from a previous EPA grant (CE- 994645-94) were dedicated to support a round of
watershed demonstration projects. The River Basin Regional Councils selected projects and
allocated funding levels in May 2004. The total funds available for the projects was
$250,000 with $50,000 available per basin. A “Request for Proposals” was open for
governmental agencies, educational institutions, and non-profits.
The projects address the main sections of the APNEP Comprehensive Conservation and
Management Plan (CCMP): water quality, vital habitats, fisheries and stewardship. The
projects should have three main components: 1) they should be physical in-ground projects,
2) they should have a public outreach/education element, and 3) they should have
transferable methods. Prospective grant recipients were encouraged to partner with others to
leverage additional funds.
The following is a summary for each project active in FY 2006:
Low Impact Development Demonstration and Education for the Upper Neuse River
Basin
Demonstrate the effectiveness of Low Impact Development techniques in reducing
stormwater runoff
Lead Agency: North Carolina State University Water Quality Group
Partners: DENR Division of Water Quality, NCSU Biological &
Agricultural Engineering Dept., NCSU College of Design, Habitat
for Humanity
Status: In Progress
Output: Demonstration BMPs
Outcome: Improved stormwater management and water quality
Funding: $25,000
23
Leverage: $170,100
Citizens’ Oyster Gardening Program for North Carolina
Demonstrate a way citizens can assist in restoring native oyster numbers and their
ecological functions to the estuaries
Lead Agency: Carteret Community College
Partners: DENR Division of Marine Fisheries, NC National Estuarine
Research Reserve, NC Division of Coastal Management, NC
Shellfish Growers Association
Status: Complete
Output: Educational workshops, oyster raising materials, website
Outcome: Oysters and habitat, cleaner water
Funding: $31,946
Leverage: $1,000
Stormwater Wetland at Pactolus Elementary School
Plan and create a stormwater wetland on a parcel located adjacent to Pactolus
Elementary School in Pitt County, NC. The wetland will capture runoff from the
school’s parking lot and roof drains, which presently empties into Grindle Creek as
untreated stormwater runoff. The site will educate local students about wetlands and serve
as an outdoor classroom.
Lead Agency: Pitt County Planning Department
Partners: Pitt County School Board, Cooperative Extension, Coastal Land
Trust
Status: In Progress
Intended Output: Wetland, report, educational area
Intended Outcome: Constructed wetland, better stormwater management, improved
water quality
Funding: $31,200
Leverage: $ 1,000
Bennett’s Millpond Demonstration Project
This project focused on creating a community facility to provide opportunities for
environmental education and stewardship. A “green roof” demonstration component is
included to analyze the environmental impact of a green roof design on the surrounding
microclimate. Outreach components included a Millpond calendar, a biyearly event
brochure (for the local counties) and promotional brochure for wider distribution.
Lead Agency: Edenton-Chowan County Schools
Partners: Chowan County Recreation Department, Chowan County
Status: Complete
Output: Outdoor educational facility, brochures, calendar, demonstration
green roof
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Funding: $26,740
Leverage: Pending
24
Town of Gatesville Water Quality Project
Projects consists of stormwater BMP construction and monitoring to determine pollution
contribution / changes. Construction delays have slowed the project.
Lead Agency: Albemarle Resource Conservation and Development Council
Partners: Town of Gatesville, Gates Soil & Water Conservation District,
NC Department of Transportation, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Citizens
Status: In Progress
Intended Output: Constructed wetland system to serve the town’s 160 acre
watershed, restored ditch banks and buffers, construct
educational display, report
Intended Outcome: Improved water quality and habitat, improved stormwater
management
Funding: $50,000
Leverage: Pending
25
ONGOING LONGTERM PROJECTS & ACTIONS
I. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring
The Coordinating Council elected to provide $20,000 in FY 2002 supplemental funds as
seed money to initiate a large-scale, long-term submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV)
monitoring effort to assess the extent of SAV coverage in the Albemarle-Pamlico
estuaries. An additional $6,000 was allocated in the FY 2003 Work Plan to support
DENR staff in learning about SAV mapping and restoration.
Submerged aquatic vegetation constitutes one of the most common estuarine habitats in
North Carolina. The 1990 published estimate of SAV area is 200,000 acres in NC. In
the contiguous 48 states, North Carolina is second only to Florida in acreage of SAV,
and has twice the acreage reported for Chesapeake Bay. SAV provides food and cover
for a great variety of commercially and recreationally important fauna and their prey.
Thirteen species of SAV have been reported for the Albemarle-Pamlico estuary. SAV
supports many species of fish and shellfish and are major fishery habitats of the shallow
sounds behind North Carolina’s barrier islands and along the coastal fringes bordering
the western side of these sounds.
Previous studies by NOAA and East Carolina University to delineate and quantify the
location and extent of SAV, based on conventional color aerial photography and field
sampling, were conducted in the late-1980s and early-1990s for major portions of the
Albemarle-Pamlico estuary. This information, some of which has been digitized in GIS-format,
has proven valuable to habitat managers in their review of dredge and fill related
permit applications and has helped Core Sound, Back Sound and western Bogue Sound
achieve nomination for designation as Outstanding Resource Waters.
Since that time, no major organized effort to map the location and extent of SAV
coverage in the Albemarle-Pamlico estuary has been conducted. SAV is being used as a
critical environmental indicator in several other estuarine systems (e.g., Indian River
Lagoon, Sarasota Bay, Tampa Bay and Chesapeake Bay). Currently, North Carolina
lacks the information necessary to determine reliable trends in SAV distribution and
health.
APNEP has partnered with NC Division of Marine Fisheries, US Fish and Wildlife
Service, Elizabeth City State University and the NC Coastal Nonpoint Source Program
to conduct aerial photography flights over Back Bay, Currituck Sound and Kitty Hawk
Bay.
Status: In Progress
Output: Report, GIS data, maps, educational opportunities
Outcome: Better environmental data, better resource management and
planning
Funding & Source: EPA FY 2002 – $20,000 - Complete
EPA FY 2003 – $6,000 - Complete
26
EPA FY 2005 – $20,000 Contracted (Phase II - In Progress)
EPA FY 2006 – To be contracted with FY 2007 funding for
digital image acquisition.
Partners: NC Division of Marine Fisheries, US Fish and
Wildlife Service, Elizabeth City State University,
the NC Coastal Nonpoint Source Program, and
NC Division of Water Resources.
In FY 2007 APNEP will provide the base funding necessary to acquire digital aerial
photography of potential SAV habitats in the APNEP region. This imagery is a
necessary step in providing APNEP partners with information on the current status of
SAV in the sounds. See Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring in Ongoing
Projects for more information. Also see FY 2005 and FY 2006 Projects.
II. EPA Supported Nonpoint Source Pollution Related Restoration Project (Tryon
Palace)
During FY 2001, APNEP received $75,000 to support an environmental NPS-related
restoration project in the APNEP region. These funds were used to support and leverage
Clean Water Management Trust Fund money to construct a wetland and storm water
management project associated with Tryon Palace State Historic Site in New Bern, NC.
Specifically, these funds are to create a cord grass marshland in the designated area
along the confluence of the Neuse and Trent rivers.
The current contract is ongoing and the project is still underway. Ground breaking and
site dedication occurred in the fall of 2002. Although much planning has been done, no
invoice has yet been received for the specific activity defined for this contract.
􀂙􉥔 This action supports the CCMP’s Vital Habitats Plan, Objective C, Management
Action 3: “Enhance existing efforts to restore the functions and values of degraded
wetlands and vital fisheries habitats. Develop and begin implementing an expanded
program to restore wetlands.”
Status: In Progress
Output: Wetland, riparian buffer
Outcome: Restored wetland, improved water quality and habitat
Estimated Cost: $75,000
Funding Source: EPA dedicated funds for project
III. APNEP Program Administration
Staff are responsible for the coordination, planning and successful completion of
APNEP functions including Policy Board and Advisory Committee meetings, APNEP
forums and other APNEP-sponsored events. In addition, staff monitors, and often
becomes involved in, activities of state resource management agencies that relate to
CCMP implementation. Staff also attend meetings, conferences and workshops in order
27
to stay apprised of technological advancements that may prove beneficial in the APNEP
region. Although the Policy Board and Advisory Committee are instrumental in
identifying local environmental issues and prioritizing management actions within each
basin, most management actions are implemented by various state agencies on a local,
basinwide, regional or statewide basis.
Presently, the staff consists of the program office in Raleigh, with the Director, Science
Coordinator, and Restoration Specialist. A NC Watershed Field Representative has
offices in Raleigh and Washington; the APNEP public involvement office also in
Washington houses the Community Development Specialist. The APNEP also has two
contract employees: the Citizens’ Monitoring Network Coordinator at East Carolina
University in Greenville, and the Virginia Watershed Field Representative in Suffolk.
For more detail see Administration and Financial section.
Status: In Progress - Ongoing (See Administrative and Financial Section)
Output: Program administration, reports, leverage, presentations
Outcome: Environmental result, CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $244,427 will be needed for administration and implementation of
the APNEP and the CCMP.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
IV. Virginia Watershed Field Coordinator
The headwaters for the Pasquotank, Chowan and Roanoke River basins are located
within Virginia. One of the most critical components to effectively implement the
CCMP within these basins is long-term, comprehensive coordination between North
Carolina and Virginia. The Watershed Field Coordinator for Virginia provides
coordination and support to APNEP, DENR and the Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation (VA DCR), and enhances implementation of the CCMP in
the Roanoke, Chowan and Pasquotank river basins. The APNEP supports one-half of
this position for at least 20 hours per week. The contract has been extended for another
year.
􀂙􉥔 The Virginia Watershed Field Coordinator directly supports the CCMP's
Implementation Plan, Objective A: Management Action 2: “Coordinate
implementation of the CCMP.”
Status: In Progress - Ongoing
Output: Program administration, reports, leverage, presentations
Outcome: Environmental result, CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $30,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
V. Citizens’ Monitoring Network
The APNEP Citizens’ Monitoring Network (CMN) is a network of private citizens who
monitor surface water quality in the Albemarle-Pamlico estuary and its tributaries. The
28
program began as an initiative of the Pamlico-Tar River Foundation in 1988, to protect,
preserve and promote the water quality of the Tar-Pamlico River and its watershed.
Today, the program includes all waters located in the Albemarle-Pamlico region.
The CMN has three areas of activity: Baseline Monitoring, Targeted Monitoring and
Surveys, and Water Quality Education. Program volunteers receive support in each of
these areas through water quality education and training, QA/QC workshops,
distribution of equipment and supplies, data management/analysis, and networking
opportunities. Participants primarily monitor "vital signs" of the estuary. Specifically,
parameters tested include: dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity, air and water temperatures,
and turbidity to gauge the general health or quality of water in the estuary. Using basic
but accurate water quality test kits, citizen volunteers analyze their water samples,
observe qualitative factors such as weather conditions and other visual indicators, and
record the results.
All monitoring data collected are forwarded to the CMN office at ECU where staff
compiles the information and enters the data into reporting form for citizen and
government agency use. Information is available to the public on the APNEP website at
http://www.apnep.org/ and at http://www.ecu.edu/icmr/cwqmp. This is a very popular
program and it continues to be expanded.
Operation of the APNEP Citizens’ Monitoring Network (including Coordinator,
equipment, supplies, office and lab space and indirect costs) will be continued by
extending the contract with East Carolina University.
􀂙􉥔 The Citizens’ Monitoring Network directly supports the CCMP's Stewardship Plan,
Objective B: Management Action 4: “Expand involvement in the Citizens’ Water
Quality Monitoring Program (CWQMP) and make the program more interactive
with regulatory agencies.”
Status: In Progress - Ongoing
Output: Awareness, data
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: Continued operation of the Citizens’ Monitoring Network
(including Coordinator, equipment, supplies, lab space and
indirect costs) will require $56,000 (via contract with East
Carolina University).
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
VI. Program Enhancements Relating to Smithfield Foods Agreement
In July 2000, the NC Attorney General’s Office and Smithfield Foods, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, the largest hog producing and pork processing companies in the world,
signed a major agreement. It is a legally binding agreement that focuses on the
elimination of open-air hog lagoons and spray fields in North Carolina. An element of
29
the agreement states that the Smithfield companies will play a "leadership role in
enhancing the effectiveness of the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program.” Staff
has met several times with representatives from Smithfield Farms, the NC Attorney
General’s Office and NC DENR on topics of interest. Little progress has been made and
support intentions are unclear.
In FY 2005 APNEP staff applied for two grants totaling $940,203 from the Smithfield
Environmental Enhancement Grants for SAV mapping and non-point source pollution
reduction in Ward Creek. Staff will seek additional partners and resubmit the proposals.
Status: Ongoing
Estimated Cost: No cost
Funding Source: N/A
VII. OTHER PROJECTS
GIS Outreach and Services
The APNEP had contracted with the NC Center for Geographic Information and
Analysis (CGIA) to provide GIS support and training as well as accessible and
affordable GIS data for planning and educational purposes.
Status: In Progress
Output: GIS data, training, reports
Outcome: Enhanced environmental awareness and management
resources
Estimated Cost: $18,000
Funding Source: EPA funds (Remaining from previous NC CGIA contract)
North Carolina – Virginia Shared Resources Forum
A forum for state resource agencies and local governments in the Roanoke,
Chowan and Pasquotank river basins will be held to review resources shared by
the two states. This forum has been delayed in order to assess the role of the new
Roanoke Bi-State Commission as designated by the General Assembly of both
states. Approximately $1,000 is budgeted for this effort using EPA funds from
previous years. The current strategic planning exercise has identified a
Governor’s agreement as a possible goal for the program. It should also be noted
that the APNEP Watershed Field Coordinator for Virginia is playing a key role
in inter-state relations with issues in our shared river basins.
􀂙􉥔 This action directly supports the CCMP’s Implementation Plan, Objective A,
Management Action 2: “Coordinate implementation of the CCMP.”
Status: Planning
Estimated Cost: $1,000
Funding Source: EPA funds from previous years - budgeted in the FY 2003
Work Plan.
30
PROJECTS & ACTIONS FOR FY 2007
New projects for FY 2007 will continue to support the implementation strategy as outlined in
the CCMP and support program reform and CCMP update efforts.
Program Administration
For more detail see Administration and Financial, and Ongoing Projects sections.
􀂙􉥔 These actions support the CCMP’s Implementation Plan goal: “Implement the CCMP in
a way that protects environmental quality while using the most cost-effective and equitable
strategies.”
Type: Ongoing
Intended Output: Program administration, partnership building, CCMP implementation
Intended Outcome: CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $ 244,427
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Watershed Field Coordinator - Virginia
For more detail see Ongoing Projects section.
􀂙􉥔 These actions support the CCMP’s Implementation Plan goal: “Implement the CCMP in a
way that protects environmental quality while using the most cost-effective and equitable
strategies.”
Type: Ongoing
Intended Output: Governmental coordination, public involvement
Intended Outcome: CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $ 30,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Board and Committees Support
The key element of the CCMP’s implementation is active citizen participation. On May 16th,
2005, North Carolina Governor Michael F. Easley signed Executive Order # 74: Creation of A
Program Office, A Policy Board, and Advisory Committees to Support Natural Resource And
Environmental Management in the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuarine System. This
Executive Order is essential to the future of the APNEP and was developed after more than two
years of program review and assessment, and stakeholder participation. Members are currently
being recruited to fill the positions on the Policy Board and Advisory Committees.
􀂙􉥔 This action supports the CCMP’s Implementation Plan, Objective B: “Assess the
progress and success of implementing CCMP recommendations and the status of environmental
quality in the Albemarle-Pamlico Sounds region.”
31
Type: Ongoing
Intended Output: Partnership building, outreach, CCMP implementation prioritization
Intended Outcome: New and greater public involvement, estuarine indicator development
Estimated Cost: $ 5,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Financial Planning
This project was identified in the FY 2004 work plan to be addressed as funding became
available. As APNEP continues with program restructuring, staff and Board members will
work with EPA staff to identify and develop strategies for leveraging funds beyond EPA grant
funds. EPA staff / contractor will lead this effort. Staff will work with the EPA and the Policy
Board or Citizen Advisory Committee to develop the meeting. EPA has made funding available
for planning in FY 2007.
Status: New
Intend Output: Report, public involvement
Intended Outcome: Additional resources for CCMP implementation
Estimated Cost: $10,000
Funding Source: EPA supplemental funds for Financial Planning in FY 2007
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Image Acquisition
In FY 2007 APNEP will provide the base funding necessary to acquire digital aerial
photography of potential SAV habitats in the APNEP region. This imagery is a necessary step
in providing APNEP partners with information on the current status of SAV in the sounds. See
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Monitoring in Ongoing Projects for more information.
􀂙􉥔 This action supports the CCMP’s Water Quality Plan goal: “Restore, maintain or enhance
water quality in the Albemarle-Pamlico region so that it is fit for fish, wildlife and recreation.”
Type: Ongoing
Intended Output: Report, GIS data, maps, educational opportunities
Intended Outcome: Better environmental data, better resource management and planning
Estimated Cost: $ 140,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Leverage: Pending
Citizens’ Monitoring Network
For more detail see Ongoing Projects section.
􀂙􉥔 This action supports the CCMP’s Water Quality Plan: Management Action 4: “Expand
involvement in the Citizens' Water Quality Monitoring Program (CWQMP) and make the
program more interactive with regulatory agencies.”
32
Type: Ongoing
Intended Output: Awareness, data
Intended Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 56,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
NC Teaching Fellows (Coastal)
APNEP will partner with NC Teaching Fellows Program, the Cape Lookout Studies Program,
Friends of the N.C. Maritime Museum, and the NCNERR to provide a Junior Enrichment
Program. Teaching Fellows are required to participate in a number of experiences designed to
enhance their campus programs and give insights into the challenges facing them when they
enter the classroom. This opportunity will be provided as a Junior Enrichment Program for
rising juniors. Participants will receive instruction in the application of practical activities and
curriculum related to coastal environments. Participants will receive activity guides and
teaching materials.
􀂙􉥔 This project supports the CCMP's Stewardship Plan Objective C: “Ensure that students,
particularly in grades K-5, are exposed to science and environmental education.”
Type: New
Intended Output: Pre-service junior enrichment for 15 NC Teaching Fellows
Intended Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 6,000
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Leverage: To be determined
Outreach Activities
This project supports all of APNEP’s outreach activities, including the APNEP newsletter, e-mail
updates and other outreach materials.
􀂙􉥔 This project supports the CCMP’s Stewardship Plan goal: “Promote responsible
stewardship of the natural resources of the Albemarle-Pamlico region.”
Status: Ongoing
Intended Output: Public outreach and involvement
Intended Outcome: CCMP Implementation, increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 1,173
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2006
Leverage: To be determined
33
Web Site
The APNEP web site (www.apnep.org) will continue to disseminate information about the
mission and goals of the NEP and provide information on progress of CCMP implementation.
The APNEP web site will also carry The Beacon.
􀂙􉥔 This project supports the CCMP’s Stewardship Plan goal: “Promote responsible
stewardship of the natural resources of the Albemarle-Pamlico region.”
Status: Ongoing
Intended Output: Public outreach and involvement
Intended Outcome: CCMP Implementation, increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: Unknown
Funding Source: NC DENR
Leverage: To be determined
Estuary Live! Spring 2007
APNEP will again partner with the NC National Estuarine Research Reserve to offer interactive
field trips for students from North Carolina and throughout the world.
Status: Ongoing
Output: 4 days of broadcast
Outcome: Increased environmental awareness
Estimated Cost: $ 500
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2003
Leverage: To be determined
34
ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL
I. APNEP PERSONNEL
Program staff are responsible for the coordination, planning and successful completion of
APNEP functions including Board and Committee meetings, APNEP forums and other APNEP-sponsored/
partner events. In addition, staff monitors, and often becomes involved in, activities
of state resource management agencies that relate to CCMP implementation, the Albemarle-
Pamlico watershed or estuary. Staff also attend meetings, conferences and workshops in order
to stay apprised of technological advancements that may prove beneficial in the APNEP region
and the program.
Presently, the APNEP staff consists of the APNEP program office in Raleigh, with the Director
(Bill Crowell), Science Coordinator (Dean Carpenter), and Restoration Specialist (Kelly
Williams). The APNEP public involvement office in Washington, NC houses the Public
Involvement Coordinator (Joan Giordano) and NC Watershed Field Representative (Jimmy
Johnson). The APNEP also has two contract employees: the Citizens’ Monitoring Network
Coordinator (vacant) in Greenville, and the Virginia Watershed Field Representative (Noah
Hill) in Suffolk, Virginia.
In the coming year, the new Policy Board and Advisory Committees will be instrumental in
identifying local environmental issues, prioritizing management actions within the watershed,
and working through the NEP Program Office to advise the various state and local agencies on
CCMP implementation.
Overall administration costs for FY 2007 are estimated at approximately $ 244,427 and includes
salaries, fringe, longevity pay, rent, supplies, and indirect costs.
Program Director
The Program Director administrates and coordinates program activities and the CCMP
implementation process, involving interaction with numerous federal and state resource
management agencies, universities, interest groups, and the general public. This position
manages the post-CCMP grants and associated contracts, provides staff support to the APNEP
Policy Board and Advisory Committees, and represents the APNEP at local, state, regional and
national meetings.
Personnel: Bill Crowell will continue in this role. Mr. Crowell has been the Director
since June 2002.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Public Involvement Coordinator
The Public Involvement Coordinator supports public/ community relations and knowledge
concerning issues relating to the Albemarle-Pamlico region; facilitates the implementation of
the CCMP; develops and implements educational and outreach programs; promotes dialogue
between local government officials and private citizens; and provides liaison responsibility for
35
the Citizens’ Monitoring Network. This position also provides valuable staff support to the
Policy Board and Advisory Committees.
Personnel: Joan Giordano will continue in this role. Ms. Giordano has served in this
role since 1987.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Science Coordinator
The Science Coordinator assists the Program Director with administration and coordination of
the CCMP. This position helps design and implement a comprehensive monitoring strategy and
reporting process, guide the Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC), and reviews
project proposals and reports for merit. This position provides staff support to the Policy Board
and Advisory Committees.
Personnel: Dean Carpenter will continue in this role. Dr. Carpenter has served in this
role since November 2003.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Restoration Specialist /Watershed Field Representative
The Restoration Specialist /Watershed Field Representative assists the Program Director to
administrate and coordinate the CCMP implementation process, involving interaction with
numerous federal and state resource management agencies, universities, interest groups, and the
general public. This position assists in the management of contracts, and provides staff support
to the Policy Board and Advisory Committees.
Personnel: Kelly Williams will continue in this role. Ms. Williams has served in this
role since October 2003.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
Watershed Field Coordinator (NC)
This position provides an essential function as an APNEP liaison to local governments and state
agencies. The Watershed Field Coordinator (NC) provides coordination and support to local
governments and state agencies to enhance CCMP implementation. This position also provides
staff support to the Policy Board and Advisory Committees. This position splits time between
the Raleigh and Washington DENR Regional Offices.
Personnel: Jimmy Johnson will continue in this role. Mr. Johnson has served in this role
since January 2006.
Funding Source: NC DENR
Watershed Field Coordinator (VA)
Contracted support. See description under Ongoing Projects.
Personnel: Noah Hill will continue in this role.
Funding Source: EPA funds for FY 2007
36
II. GRANTS TO LOCAL ENTITIES
The Albemarle-Pamlico NEP let numerous contracts in FY 2006 in order to accomplish the
tasks presented in the FY 2003 to FY 2006 Work Plans. These items are discussed in the Goals
and Accomplishments, and the Ongoing Projects sections of this report.
Additionally, funds from a previous EPA grant (CE- 994645-94) have been dedicated to help
support numerous projects. All funds under this grant have been spent or are in contractual
obligations and should be spent by December 2007.
An additional grant was received from the EPA in December 2005. This Regional Wetland
Grant (CD-9444206) is to develop a comprehensive assessment and tracking methodology for
wetland functionality in the Chowan estuary of Western Albemarle Sound. APNEP partnered
with Environmental Defense to obtain a Regional Wetlands Grant. Environmental Defense is
providing the required matching funds for this grant. Since this project is not funded by the
section 320 funds, it is not reported in the following table.
The following table provides an overview of all completed and active grants to local entities
since October 1, 2005 for section 320 funds under CE-9746802, CE- 994645-94, or NC DENR
funds for APNEP activities.
37
GRANTS TO LOCAL ENTITIES (October 1, 2005 to June 1, 2006)
Project
Title
Funded
Amount
Project
Leader Purpose Deliverables
Completion
Date Status
Watershed Coordinator
(VA)
$30,000
VA. Dept.
Conservation &
Recreation
Fund Watershed Coordinator
in
VA-NC Shared river basins
Program support
Reports Ongoing In Progress
Citizens’ Monitoring
Network $56,000
East Carolina
University
Outreach / Monitoring Program
Newsletters
Reports,
Database
Ongoing In Progress
Riparian Restoration
(Tryon Palace)
$75,000 EPA
dedicated funds
for project
Tryon Palace
Committee
Riparian Restoration Shoreline
restoration
Reports
September
2006
In Progress
Teacher Institute 2006 $22,000 Environmental
Education Fund
Develop and Implement a Teacher
Institute for 25 teachers
Week long Institute
Report
July 2006
In Progress
Forestry BMP Manual $15,000 NC Div. Forest
Resources
Develop and Distribute a Forestry
BMP Manual
Manual
Meetings
September
2006 In Progress
GIS Support $18,000 NC CGIA GIS Support GIS Services
Training
September
2006
In Progress
LID Demo Project $25,000 NCSU Low Impact Development Demo
Construction
Documentation
Outreach
July 2006
In Progress
SAV Mapping
Phase II
$40,000 ($20 K
from APNEP)
Elizabeth City
State University
SAV mapping project
Phase I
SAV Mapping
GIS
September
2006
In Progress
Pactolus Stormwater
Wetland
$31,200 Pitt County Construct a Stormwater Wetland Construction
Documentation
Outreach
September
2006 In Progress
Conservation
Assessment NC Phase
II
$12,000 NC Natural
Heritage
Conservation Assessment Documents
GIS
August
2006
In Progress
Town of Gatesville
Water Quality Project $50,000 Albemarle RC&D Stormwater Controls
Construction
Documentation
Outreach
September
2006
In Progress
Student Wetland
Nursery Program
$13,210 NC Coastal
Federation
Student Wetland Nursery Program Construction
Outreach
July
2006
In Progress
Gates County High
School
$17,215 Gates County Outdoor Learning Center
Nature Trail
Construction
Outreach
September
2006
In Progress
38
Project
Title
Funded
Amount
Project
Leader Purpose Deliverables
Completion
Date Status
Bennett’s Millpond
$26,740
Edenton-Chowan
County Schools
Environmental education facility
and a “green roof”
Construction
Outreach
December
2005
Complete
Conservation
Assessment for the
Chowan River Basin
$15,000 Virginia Natural
Heritage
Conservation Assessment Documents
GIS
December
2005
Complete
Northampton Outdoor
Learning Center
Nature Trail
$20,000 Northampton
County
Outdoor Learning Center Nature
Trail
Construction
Documentation
Outreach
December
2005
Complete
Washington
Montessori School
Bio-Swale
$20,000 Washington
Montessori
Charter School
Construct a bio-filter (bio-swale) Construction
Documentation
Outreach
December
2005
Complete
Wetlands Assessment
and Mapping for the
Chowan River Basin
$30,196 Virginia Institute
of Marine
Sciences
Wetlands Assessment and
Mapping
Documents
GIS
May 2006 Complete
Local Government
Survey
$6,000
(NC DENR)
Boyce Hudson Local Government Survey Documents March 2006 Complete
JEJ Moore
Outdoor Classroom &
Nature Trail
$10,000 Prince George
County Schools
Outdoor Learning Center
Nature Trail
Construction
Documentation
Outreach
April 2006 Complete
Perquimans HS
Constructed Wetland
$20,000 Perquimans
County Schools
Wetland Construction
Outreach
March 2006 Complete
Citizens’ Oyster
Gardening Demo $31,946
Carteret Comm.
College Citizens’ Oyster Gardening Demo
Oysters
Outreach
November
2005
Complete
Carteret Comm. Coll.
Shoreline Restoration $20,978
NC Coastal
Federation Shoreline Restoration
Shoreline
Plantings Pending Pending
Perquimans High
School Phase II $11,400
Perquimans
County Schools
Bridge Replacement Bridge Pending Pending
Williamston HS
LID Demonstration $25,000
Town of
Williamston
BMP Construction BMP Construction Pending Pending
Red Mill Riparian
Buffer
$25,000 City of Virginia
Beach
BMP Construction
Outdoor Classroom
BMP Construction Pending Pending
Manteo Middle School
Stormwater
$14,500 Manteo Middle
School
BMP Construction BMP Construction Pending Pending
PS Jones Outdoor
Classroom
$25,000 Washington
County Schools
BMP Construction
Outdoor Classroom
BMP Construction Pending Pending
39
III. LEVERAGE FUNDS
The Albemarle-Pamlico NEP has more actively sought alternative sources of funding for APNEP
activities and projects to fulfill the goals of the CCMP. In addition, the APNEP sought out
additional avenues for collaborating with other agencies to assist in targeting these program funds
towards CCMP and basinwide goals. Where possible, APNEP worked to cost-share projects to
increase the effectiveness or the magnitude of projects, even though in several cases the APNEP was
not the primary catalyst for the project.
As the program progresses, the APNEP is working to leverage more funds through partnerships,
projects and grants. APNEP will be working with NC DENR to develop a strategy for the
development of additional state funds for program activities.
Additionally, the APNEP staff will work with EPA staff to identify and develop strategies for
leveraging funds beyond the EPA section 320 grant funds.
The APNEP has been successful in its ability to promote the needs, as well as the successes,
associated with natural resource management, protection and enhancement efforts in the APNEP
region. Several state conservation-funding sources were developed in response to research funded
by the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuary Study. These programs include Clean Water Management Trust
Fund, Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program, and the North Carolina Conservation Reserve
and Enhancement Program.
FY 2005
The APNEP was a primary partner in leveraging nearly seven times the federal grant amount in FY
2005, and assisted in the leverage for projects in the NEP program area at an overall level of
approximately 125 times the amount of funds received from the EPA.
FY 2006
During FY 2006, the Program continues to seek additional avenues for collaborating with other
partners to assist in targeting program funds towards CCMP implementation goals. APNEP will
submit its FY 2006 Leverage results in September 2006.
FY 2007
In FY 2007, the Albemarle-Pamlico NEP will continue to seek additional avenues for collaborating
with other partners to assist in targeting program funds towards CCMP implementation goals. Where
possible, APNEP will actively seek alternative sources of funding for APNEP activities and projects
to fulfill the goals of the CCMP.
40
IV. FY 2007 ESTIMATED FEDERAL COST SHARE
Federal Funds Budget FY 2007
The estimated* federal funds budget for each NEP for FY 2007 is $492,600
Supplemental funds for Financial Planning is $10,000
Total Available is $502,600
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Program Administration (Ongoing)
(staff salaries, fringe**, longevity, rent, supplies, indirect, etc.) $ 244,427
Watershed Field Coordinator (Ongoing- contract with VA DCR) $ 30,000
Boards & Committees Support (Ongoing) $ 5,000
Financial Planning (New) $ 10,000
VITAL HABITATS PLAN
SAV Image Acquisition (New) $ 140,000
STEWARDSHIP PLAN
Citizens’ Monitoring Network (Ongoing) $ 56,000
NC Teaching Fellows (New) $ 6,000
Outreach (New) $ 1,173
TRAVEL $ 10,000
Total $ 502,600
* Estimate from EPA on April 12, 2006
** Includes: Fringe Benefits based on Social Security (7.65 %) & Retirement (6.82 %) of position’s annual salary and Medical
Insurance Plan rate of $3,748 per year and
Indirect Costs based on 3.8 % of salary.
41
V. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE (Match for FY 2007)
Summary of In-kind Match Requirement
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources intends to provide $492,600 as part
of the 1:1 non-federal match and $10,000 as part of the 1:1 non-federal match for the supplemental funds.
The match will be provided through:
1) In-kind services provided by staff of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Divisions of Water Quality and Forest Resources and the Office of Conservation and Community
Affairs.
2) Costs associated with the purchase of property for conservation purposes through funding of the NC
Clean Water Management Trust Fund.
Below is a list of the intended state match:
POSITION # SALARY EFFORT Match
OFFICE OF CONSERVATION & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (OCCA)
Env. Supervisor 1 82,179 .125 10,272
Admin. Assistant 1 37,090 .125 4636
Field Representative 1 59,441 0.75 44,581
Salary 1.0 59,489
Fringe 1.0 12,356
DIVISION of WATER QUALITY (Surface Water Protection)
Env. Specialist II 1 33,790 0.5 16,895
Salary 0.5 16,895
Fringe 0.5 4,319
DIVISION of FOREST RESOURCES (Water Quality Forester)
Service Forester II 1 37,129 0.5 18,565
Salary 0.5 18,565
Fringe 0.5 4,560
Total Salary 2 94,949
Total Fringe* 2 21,235
Total In-Kind Service Match: 116,184
* Fringe is based on Social Security (7.65 %) & Retirement (6.82 %) of position’s annual salary, plus Medical Insurance Plan
rate of $3,748 per year.
Implementation Match (In-Kind Services Descriptions)
Office of Conservation and Community Affairs
APNEP is located in the Office of Conservation and Community Affairs (OCCA). NC DENR’s Office of
Conservation and Community Affairs manages the One North Carolina Naturally initiative by leading the
development and implementation of a comprehensive statewide conservation plan involving government
agencies, private organizations, landowners and the public. Protecting the state’s open space areas in this
coordinated manner facilitates the more effective use of limited funding sources. OCCA also provides
support for development of regional open space plans, providing assistance through regional meetings and
resource materials.
42
The match positions are responsible for program administration, support, community involvement and
guiding implementation of the NC Coastal Habitat Protection Plan.
NC Division of Water Quality
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) in the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources is the agency responsible for statewide regulatory programs in surface water and aquifer
protection.
DWQ's mission is to preserve, protect and enhance North Carolina's surface water and groundwater
resources through quality monitoring programs, efficient permitting, responsible management, fair and
effective enforcement and excellence in public service.
The position is located in the Washington regional office and is responsible for water quality issues,
pollution control permits, permit compliance, evaluation of environmental quality/monitoring, and
enforcement actions for violations of environmental regulations. This position represents the Surface Water
Protection section.
􀂙􉥔 This position supports the CCMP’s Water Quality Plan, Goal: Restore, maintain or enhance water
quality in the Albemarle-Pamlico region so that it is fit for fish, wildlife and recreation.” and,
􀂙􉥔 The CCMP’s Water Quality Plan, Objective E, Management Action 1: “Continue to track and evaluate
indicators of environmental stress, including algal blooms, fish kills, and fish and shellfish diseases.”
Division of Forest Reseources
In August 2002, the "Forestry NPS Unit" was established within the Division's Forest Management Branch.
The organization is charged to develop and implement water quality projects that serve to minimize NPS
pollution from forest operations. The Unit also practices technology transfer through BMP related education
and training workshops and supports publications targeted at forest operators and forestland owners. Unit
staff also share a role in normal forest management and incident operations undertaken by the Division.
􀂙􉥔 This position supports the CCMP’s Water Quality Plan, Objective B, Management Action 1:
“Strengthen implementation of forestry best management practices through training, education,
technical assistance and enforcement.”
NC CLEAN WATER TRUST MANAGEMENT FUND
Created in 1996, the Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) provides grants to local governments,
state agencies and conservation non-profits to help finance projects that specifically address water pollution
problems. CWMTF funds projects that enhance or restore degraded waters, protect unpolluted waters,
and/or contribute toward a network of riparian buffers and greenways for environmental, educational, and
recreational benefits.
The following projects within the Albemarle-Pamlico region will be used for match.
Project Location/ River Basin Purpose Amount
Hughes Tract-Upper
Broad Creek
Text/ Neuse River Riparian conservation
easement (47 acres)
$ 386,416
Total $ 386,416
43
CWMTF Project Description
Hughes Tract-Upper Broad Creek
NC Coastal Land Trust, Acquisition/ Hughes Tract-Upper Broad Creek in the Neuse River Basin. Contract
is for $394,000 and is due to end on 4/30/07. Appraisals were received in April 2006. The project as
planned will protect through permanent conservation easements 130 acres along Broad Creek, an
anadromous fish spawning area. CWMTF funds will be used to purchase easement on 47 of the 130 acres.
Tract is in close proximity to other conservation lands. APNEP will use $386,416 as match for this grant as
a conservation purchase.
SUMMARY OF STATE MATCH
In-kind Positions (salaries and fringe): $ 116,184
Clean Water Management Trust Fund Projects: $ 386,416
TOTAL: $ 502,600
44
VI. TRAVEL
The EPA considers personal, face-to-face contact with peers and colleagues essential for information
sharing and technology transfer. As part of the federal grant, EPA provides APNEP with $10,000 allocated
as travel funds for program enhancement, education, and outreach support. These funds are to be used for
activities such as:
1) Presentations at or participation in national or regional NEP meetings
2) Presentations at or participation in workshops or conferences
3) Travel to other NEPs or communities to provide peer-to-peer technical assistance
4) Travel to other NEPs or watersheds for assistance
5) Travel by NEP staff or stakeholders from other NEPs or watershed programs to provide NEP with
assistance
6) Travel to national or international conferences to share information on the National Estuary Program
Stakeholders may include citizens, members of environmental or public interest organizations, business or
industry representatives, academicians, scientists or technical experts. As a requirement of this grant
agreement, members of the APNEP core staff are required to attend all meetings called on behalf of the
NEPs. These funds cannot be used to pay for travel of Federal employees.
FY 2006
During FY 2006, APNEP staff and citizen volunteers (STAC) attended a number of meetings and
conferences using the allotted travel funds. Travel may also be supported by specific project funds or
administration costs. Below is a summary of these activities:
Personnel Date Purpose Location Cost*
Crowell, Carpenter
& Giordano
10/05 EPA- ANEP/NEP
National Meeting
Newport, RI $ 3,000
Crowell, Giordano 12/05 NEP Region IV
Meeting
Atlanta, GA $ 1,000
Crowell 1/06 NEP Directors
Planning Meeting
Cocoa Beach, FL $ 500
Crowell 3/06 EPA- ANEP/NEP
National Meeting
Washington,
DC
$ 3,000
Crowell 5/06 LCREP
Implementation
Review
Portland, OR $ 1,000
Carpenter 5/06 National WQ
Monitoring Meeting
San Jose, CA $ 1,300
Staff 9/06 ANEP-EPA/NEP
National Meeting
San Francisco $ 2,000
APNEP Staff 10/05 to
9/ 2006
Normal Program
Activities
APNEP area $ 1,500
*Estimate
FY 2007 Projected Travel
All travel is allocated into three categories: In-State, Out-of-State, and EPA Required. All travel must be
consistent with NC DENR travel polices and procedures. Due to the dynamic nature of the NEP, we cannot
schedule all travel a year ahead: we can only provide an estimate based on established NC DENR rates
(below). Some travel is associated with specific projects, and travel costs are included in budgeted amounts.
45
In-State:
In-State travel is primarily for program staff to conduct routine business associated with APNEP
daily operations, staff training or topical meetings germane to the program. It may also cover non-staff
for NEP business (i.e. board and committee members, guest speakers, and experts). Rates are
listed below.
In-state estimate for FY 2007: 30 trips, among 4 staff members; average cost per trip approximately
$100. Total $3,000
Out-of-State:
Out-of-State travel is primarily for program staff to conduct business associated with the NEP, staff
training or topical meetings germane to the program. It may also cover non-staff (i.e. board and
committee members, guest speakers, experts) for NEP related activities. Rates are listed below.
Out-of-State Estimate for FY 2007: 2 trips, 2 days, average cost per trip approximately $500.00.
Total $1,000
EPA-required:
The NEP holds two national meetings each year (these may be in same fiscal year or not). Each
program is required to participate in the meetings. The Spring meeting is held in Washington, D.C.
and the fall meeting location rotates among the different NEP sites. The level of staff participation
will vary depending on the agenda for a particular meeting. Generally two members attend. It may
also cover non-staff (i.e. Board or Advisory Committee members).
Estimate for FY 2007: 2 trips, total, 3 persons --- average cost per trip per person is approximately
$1000.00 (based on prior travel). Total $6,000
46
NC DENR TRAVEL RATES (FY 2006)
Item In-State Out of State Overnight Trip Day Trip
Breakfast $ 7.00 $ 7.00 Leave Office before
6:00 AM
Leave Office before 6:00 AM;
Extend workday by 2 hours
Lunch $ 9.25 $ 9.25 Leave Office by
12:00 Noon;
Overnight return
after 2:00 PM
Never claimed on day trip
Dinner $ 15.75 $ 17.75 Depart office before 5:00 PM
Return after 8:00 PM
Extend workday by 3 hours
Breakfast/
Dinner
Leave office before 6:00 AM;
Return after 8:00 PM;
Extend workday by 5 hours
Hotel (+ taxes) $ 59.75 $ 71.00
FY 2007 Projected Travel
Personnel Date Purpose Location
Estimated
Cost
APNEP Staff &
volunteers
October to
September
Normal Program
Activities
Albemarle –
Pamlico Region
$ 3,000
APNEP Staff March
2007
NEP National
meeting
Washington, DC $ 3,000
APNEP Staff October to
September
National Meetings TBA $ 4,000
47
Attachment 1: Implementation Review Findings
Attachment 2: Executive Order #74
48
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
OCT 1 9 2005
OFFICE OF
WATER
Mr. Bill Crowell, Director Albemarle-Pamlico
National Estuary Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-3060
Dear Mr. Crowell:
The purpose of this letter is to provide a summary of the Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) 2005 Implementation Review (IR) and to thank you and the Albemarle-Pamlico National
Estuary Program (APNEP) staff, as well as your partners, who contributed to the 2005 IR report.
You put considerable effort into the implementation review submission and responses to our follow-up
questions. Thank you also for arranging the on-site visit by the IR Team and participating in the
associated meetings and field trips.
The implementation review process, now scheduled every three years, continues to prove to
be extremely valuable for determining each National Estuary Program's (NEP) progress and
effectiveness and thus, each program's funding eligibility. It has added considerably to EP A
Headquarters and Regional staff knowledge of each individual NEP, and will promote sharing of
effective and innovative initiatives and approaches across all 28 NEPs as well as with other
watershed programs around the country. EP A also is using the implementation review process to
assess how the NEPs support the core elements of the Clean Water Act (CW A), and to evaluate the
extent and effectiveness of the NEPs' contribution to achieving the goals in EPA's 2003 Strategic
Plan. The NEPs' efforts are particularly relevant to Goa14: Healthy Communities and Ecosystems,
Objective 4.3, Protect and Restore Ecosystems, and Goal 2: Clean and Safe Water, Objective 2.2,
Water Quality on a Watershed Basis.
This implementation review featured the participation of a volunteer ex-officio NEP
Director, Jan Smith, Director of the Massachusetts Bays Program (MBP) NEP. Jan's
participation provided the EPA team members with an NEP perspective of the perceived
strengths and challenges of the program undergoing the review. In addition, Jan shared ideas
from the MBP that should be useful for the APNEP.
Based on the IR Team's findings, we believe that the APNEP is continuing to make
significant progress in implementing its Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan
(CCMP). We are pleased to report that the APNEP "passes" the 2005 Implementation Review and
will be eligible for FY 2006, 2007 and 2008 funding authorized by the CW A §320. As provided
for in our FY 2006 budget appropriation for the NEP, we are providing $500,000 for FY 2006.
Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov
RecycledIRecyclable • Printed with Vegetable au Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Post consumer)
-
49
Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program 2005 Implementation Review Findings
Following is a summary of the key findings identified by the reviewers regarding the
APNEP strengths as well as some recommendations regarding potential areas for improvement.
The review comments are intended to recognize and applaud the Program's successes and support
efforts to further strengthen the Program. The Program's response to these recommendations will
be evaluated in the 2008 Implementation Review cycle.
Strengths
• Education and Outreach: The APNEP has effectively informed citizens about the value of
the watershed through several activities. Highlights include the APNEP's partnership with
North Carolina's Office of Environmental Education and Environmental Education Fund to
produce a week-long estuarine Teacher Training Institute; the APNEP's continued
participation in Estuary Live, a virtual field trip of the estuary; and a well attended day-long
symposium that featured CCMP implementation activities. Additional activities worth
noting include an enhanced APNEP website that is updated regularly and the quarterly
Beacon newsletter that provides useful information regarding the Program. This outreach
effectively informs the public about water quality, vital habitats, fisheries and habitat health
in the estuary, as well as how the public can help protect and restore these resources. It also
strengthens public awareness and raises support for the Program. The APNEP is also in the
process of developing a communication strategy that will identify its key audiences, develop
central messages, and target media to disseminate these messages. We look forward to
seeing the APNEP receive more regular coverage from leading television stations and
newspapers as its visibility and credibility grow in the watershed .
• Administrative Capacity: The APNEP has undertaken numerous actions that have
strengthened its ability to implement the Program's CCMP. The Program has increased its
independence and stature within North Carolina's Department of Environment and Natural
Resources by moving its location to the Office of Conservation and Community Affairs. It
has hired a new Director and has given him greater authority to manage the Program. It
has hired additional staff to augment its technical capacity and field-based watershed
coordination (including one based in Virginia). These changes have strengthened the
Program's presence throughout the watershed.
The appointment of a liaison between the APNEP and North Carolina's Division of
Coastal Management has improved the coordination between the two programs. A
Science and Technical Advisory Committee (ST AC) has been established, which will
accelerate the development and tracking of environmental indicators. In addition, the
APNEP is undertaking a strategic planning exercise and assessment of its governance
structure to help identify the appropriate roles, responsibilities, and activities of the
management conference participants. We look forward to seeing the APNEP further
2
50
advance its capacity by implementing the recommendations from these activities, such as
the new system to track CCMP implementation activities and conduct biennial evaluations
of its progress.
•
Active Participation in Clean Water Act (CW A) Core Programs: The APNEP has achieved
significant success in two key elements of the CW A: water quality monitoring and non-point
source pollution control. First, the Citizens Monitoring Network engages many citizen
groups in water quality monitoring and stewardship activities. Second, the APNEP was
instrumental in the development of a ferry-based monitoring program ("FerryMon") that
has become a model for other estuaries across the Nation and has implemented real-time
monitoring platforms in three of the river basins. Third, the APNEP has guided submerged
aquatic vegetation mapping and monitoring operations. Finally, the APNEP has worked
with the State's NonPoint Source Program to conduct workshops and develop outreach
materials for contractors on best management practices and clean marinas. We expect that
APNEP's support of these and other core water programs will increase through time.
Progress Made in the Areas Highlighted in the 2002 Implementation Review
• The APNEP has made substantial progress on each of the challenges noted in the 2002
Implementation Review. The Program staff, the Secretary and Deputy Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), the Director of DENR's
Office of Conservation and Community Affairs, and the Governor's office deserve
significant credit for this new direction. As noted earlier, the APNEP increased both the
visibility and autonomy of the Program office as well as the number of Program staff. In
addition, the APNEP has effectively utilized its EP A Section 320 funds since the 2002
Implementation Review.
• The on-going efforts to restructure the management conference of the APNEP are
noteworthy. These efforts to create a structure that reflects the NEP's broad group of
stakeholders and the key resource and decision-making partners should benefit the
continuing implementation of the CCMP. Your cooperation and coordination with EPA
during the drafting of the new Governor's Executive Order to establish the revised structure
is very much appreciated.
Challenges
CCMP Update and Changes in Priorities: Although the APNEP intends to update its
CCMP, the Program has not yet developed a timetable or process for doing this. We
recommend that the APNEP develop a process that includes a timetable and milestones.
The APNEP should include necessary actions, information needs, and support mechanisms
in the revised CCMP. The APNEP should consider identifying an interim
. set of priorities, as well as a mechanism to add to and modify these actions, that takes into
account factors affecting environmental issues relevant to the estuaries and sounds.
3
51
•
Visibility: The APNEP’s location within a state agency presents challenges in terms of its
ability to appear visible and independent. In order for the APNEP to be seen as inherently
autonomous the Program must bet and must be perceived to be, independent of any particular
interest group or agency. The Director needs to be able to respond to and act on committee
recommendations independent of state agency activities. The APNEP may consider an
approach that the Massachusetts Bays Program (MBP) took to enhance its visibility and
autonomy. The MBP completed an update of its CCMP that all partners - non-profits,
citizens and state agencies - helped craft. The update carefully spelled out which activities
each party was responsible fort including specific tasks for the MBP staff, and provided a
clear definition of what the MBP staff should be doing. The update, after formal adoption by
the Management Committee, formed the basis of future priorities and Program direction. In
addition, the Program should strive to take a leadership role when possible and assert itself as
an equal partner in joint ventures. The Program should also strive for recognition when
engaged in key activities.
•
Partnerships and Fundraising: The APNEP’s extensive watershed (30,000 square miles)
presents numerous challenges. Limited resources constrain the APNEP’s ability to impact the
watershed. This underlines the importance of strategic stakeholder alliances and effective
flu}d-raising efforts. To obtain additional resources for CCMP implementation, the APNEP
should develop a strategy that identifies funding needs and alternatives, and provides for
diversifying its sources of funding to supplement existing funds. As part of that strategy, the
APNEP should work with local governments to secure at least a minimal annual contribution
from them to support the APNEP's work. EP A HQ is prepared to assist the Program in this
activity.
•
Environmental Indicators/Monitoring Plan: Although an ad-hoc Science Technical
Advisory Committee (8T AC) work group has drafted and submitted an initial set of
environmental indicators to EP A, and a two-day indicator workshop was scheduled for
August 2005, the APNEP remains without a monitoring plan framework. The 8TAC work
group should begin to develop a comprehensive monitoring strategy and plan, taking into
account previous efforts. This plan should include the continuation of the existing monitoring
program for the Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system and sounds that is a part of EPA's
National Coastal Assessment (NCA). APNEP needs to identify an ongoing source of funding
for that effort. We believe it, would be most appropriate for the state of North Carolina to
provide funding for the North Carolina component of the NCA. In addition, the plan should
be based on the concept of long-term status and trends monitoring or the identification of
temporal trends or changes over time. The Program should work with all appropriate
government agencies (federalt state, and local) and other stakeholders in the Albemarle-
Pamlico region to develop estuarine and freshwater monitoring and indicators. The Program
should complete the development and approval of environmental indicators by the end of
2005, in conjunction with the development of the monitoring plan scheduled for 2006.
4
52
• Environmental Progress: The APNEP protected or restored nearly 38,500 acres of habitat
over the 2002-2004 period. This is a significant accomplishment and represents more
acreage of habitat protected or restored than any other NEP in Region IV. Yet, the APNEP
reports no or very little data regarding "environmental trends" in the estuarine system and
its watersheds. Status and trends data are key to evaluating program impacts and results
and can be used to send a powerful message to citizens, stakeholders, and elected officials.
The Program should identify existing and develop long-term environmental data sets, and
use the information to report on environmental progress. The information can also be used
to increase support and funding for implementation of the CCMP and for public outreach
efforts.
Thank you again for participating in the implementation review process. We welcome any
additional thoughts you may have either about the review process itself or about EP A's
involvement in the APNEP's CCMP implementation. If you have any questions or comments,
please contact me or Darrell Brown, Chief, Coastal Management Branch, at telephone number
(202) 566-1256.
cc:
Bill Ross, NCDENR
Dempsey Benton, NCDENR
Robin Smith, NCDENR
Richard Rogers, NCDENR
Jan Smith, Massachusetts Bays NEP
Diane Regas, U.S. EP A
Craig Hooks, U.S. EPA
Craig Vogtt, U.S. EP A
Darrell Brown, U.S. EPA
Jim Giattina, U.S. EP A Region lV
Tom Welborn, U.S. EP A Region N
Bo Crum, U.S. EP A Region IV
Fred McManus, U.S. EPA Region IV
Bob Howard, U.S. EPA Region IV
Tim Jones, U.S. EPA
Noemi Mercado, U.S. EP A
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74