Thanks for joining guys. I dont want to force anyone but does anyone want to be assistant GM as their first choice? Once I fill that position, Ill start giving some other positions out._________________
^Stone85 on the sig^

I'm against cutting #4 on the list. I think we'll need his versatility. He can play multiple positions. I was hoping to use him to replace free agent #16.

#3 on the trade block we'll need. We shouldn't make him available. I think if we cut the guys you have listed with the exception of #4, we should be able to resign the few guys we need and not have to trade half of our starters.

I do think we can cut a few more guys and add one or two more on the trade block. I can list them once you set up a code for the roster.

I'm against cutting #4 on the list. I think we'll need his versatility. He can play multiple positions. I was hoping to use him to replace free agent #16.

#3 on the trade block we'll need. We shouldn't make him available. I think if we cut the guys you have listed with the exception of #4, we should be able to resign the few guys we need and not have to trade half of our starters.

I do think we can cut a few more guys and add one or two more on the trade block. I can list them once you set up a code for the roster.

The first one is true, but we need cap space badly if we're going to resign one or more of #13, #15, #16, #17.

I think its more of getting great value with #3, but I can go either way with that.

Ill set up a code for roster now._________________
^Stone85 on the sig^

I'm against cutting #4 on the list. I think we'll need his versatility. He can play multiple positions. I was hoping to use him to replace free agent #16.

#3 on the trade block we'll need. We shouldn't make him available. I think if we cut the guys you have listed with the exception of #4, we should be able to resign the few guys we need and not have to trade half of our starters.

I do think we can cut a few more guys and add one or two more on the trade block. I can list them once you set up a code for the roster.

The first one is true, but we need cap space badly if we're going to resign one or more of #13, #15, #16, #17.

I think its more of getting great value with #3, but I can go either way with that.

Ill set up a code for roster now.

The more I look at him, the more I think #16 is more of a liability than anything else. I don't want 13 and 16 back on this team.

I think we can get 20 to come back for cheaper and he showed more than 16 did all season. I understand with 17 and 20 the issue is their injuries, but I'd think we drafted well enough that we can withstand it. Plus, if we go BPA, we have a shot at 100027X.