Quality difference from 12 years ago on Equipment

Is there a major quality difference/improvements in, as an example a $500.00 cd/sacd player from 12 years ago, and a comparable cd/SACD player now? Wondering if an up grade is necessary...and worth changing units...I guess the same could be said for BLU ray unites.....are the good ones now, better than the good ones from 12 years ago. Curious...

Its kind of a very small market i think, unfortunately today computers and the internet are rendering all physical formats useless, minidisc, vhs, dat and now the CD itself is going to be a thing of the past very soon, the next 2 years will kill them all off, although i use my Technics RS-BX727 Quartz cassette deck a lot, i only use it to record music from the internet not from other physical formats.

Its kind of a very small market i think, unfortunately today computers and the internet are rendering all physical formats useless, minidisc, vhs, dat and now the CD itself is going to be a thing of the past very soon, the next 2 years will kill them all off, although i use my Technics RS-BX727 Quartz cassette deck a lot, i only use it to record music from the internet not from other physical formats.

Click to expand...

yes sony makes SACD unit as does OPPO....both fine units....computers and internet, will never be a apart of my musical experience. I would never use the word "USELESS"

Although an early model, I'm still very pleased with both the audio and video quality of my Oppo BDP 95. If I had to choose a "complaint" it would be that it's a little slow navigating through a disc.... especially DVD's.

Well the quality of CD transports has severely diminished over the years in terms of build. Electronics should in theory be more reliable being more chip based. I would say for budget digital sound has considerably improved coming closer to more expensive products. Is Blue Ray as old as 12 years?

The next great change hasn't really happened yet. It has on the margins but is not generally available. It won't help sound quality or reliability but will make gear more flexible and easier to operate.

That change will occur when every piece of electronics has its own IP address. A common programming architecture will also be needed. That way your receiver can talk to your TV, DVD player and lighting system over your home network. Press one button on your smart phone and the drapes will close, the lights will dim, the TV will come on, your hi-fi will power up, and your Apple TV version7 will play the season eight of "Stranger Things" on Netflix.

This can happen now but it is only for the wealthy who can hire good programmers and installers or for the geekiest among us. When this technology gets down to Joe Sixpack, watch out.

Or as a buddy asked me decades ago, "When will I have a stereo where I can say, 'Play Cinnamon Girl' and it will make everything happen?" That reality is still down the road.

In general I agree with Steve above. Over the last 12 years - since 2005, the sound quality really has not "improved" a great deal for better products.

First, we must define what an improvement is. From my perspective, items can always sound "different". For example, slight changes in digital filter parameters can result in different high frequency roll-offs and depending on one's preference, it sounds different but not necessarily represent a technological improvement. These filter differences are all the rage these days with many options for DACs and represent a selling point (for better or worse) with things like MQA.

The one area that things have improved is in objective DAC accuracy. In 2005, you probably had to spend close to $1000 for a player capable of rendering that last 16th bit of CD resolution accurately even though it is unlikely this would be audible. These days, DAC chips in modern Blu-Ray players should be able to reproduce >16-bits with good low-level linearity for cheap. Of course, the quality, life expectancy, and reliability of the drive mechanism can be a problem.

If anything, in general audio quality has gone down over the past 12 years, at least for most folks. CDs have been replaced by downloads. Reasonably good digital audio has been replaced by mp3s.

I know the OP is talking about possible improvements in better quality hardware. I agree at the top end things have been relatively static for the last dozen years. But for your neighbor or children, their experience of music has gotten poorer. It's unfortunate but then the audio industry has pushed convenience over sound quality for the last 35 years.

If anything, in general audio quality has gone down over the past 12 years, at least for most folks. CDs have been replaced by downloads. Reasonably good digital audio has been replaced by mp3s.

I know the OP is talking about possible improvements in better quality hardware. I agree at the top end things have been relatively static for the last dozen years. But for your neighbor or children, their experience of music has gotten poorer. It's unfortunate but then the audio industry has pushed convenience over sound quality for the last 35 years.

Click to expand...

A difference in generations it seems. I never ONCE ever considered convenience over quality. Nor did any of my friends or family....Never. This isn't the format to discuss why that might be....Is it a reflection of modern society? who knows...