Refac v. Hitachi A patent infringement action in which our principal trial counsel represented 18 out of 118 named defendants. He secured a judgment of non-infringement, which applied to all 118 named defendants. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed awarding fees and double costs to his clients. On remand, on the cross appeal filed on behalf of clients, plaintiffs were declared to have violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and recovered all of defense fees and expenses. The Court expressly recognized Mr. Soni’s skills:

"[T]he Magistrate Judge finds that the lawyering most decisive to the outcome, and the most helpful to the court, was done by Surjit P. Soni and his firm. His preparation was immaculate, though no more than necessary given the stakes and complexities. His clients proved to be, and they should have been, most willing to pay his fees and expenses. There is no evidence that he has overbilled in any respect; in fact, his accounting is so precise that the Magistrate Judge is able to, and he will disallow certain itemized claims. All members of the bar of this court are presumed honorable and wholly accurate in their representations to the court. Mr. Soni has proved the validity of the presumption throughout the proceedings by weighing every word and proofing every representation. His accounting contained in the Brico defendants’ claim is a veritable model." 141 F.R.D. 281 (C.D.Cal.,1991.)

Microsoft v. Wugo Complicated breach of contract, and alleged trademark-counterfeiting matter. Represented defendants and countersued for R.I.C.O. and various other claims. Obtained insurance coverage for defendant, and the case was settled for a fraction of the initial demand, with the insurance carrier paying the bulk of the settlement.

Rhodes v. E-Z Way Productions, Inc., et al. Trademark infringement and appropriation of the right of publicity case. Successfully represented client involving the Rhodes piano and The Rhodes Piano Method.

S.C. Johnson v. Victory Wholesale Grocers; Clorox v.Victory Wholesale Grocers; L & F Products v. Victory Wholesale Grocers Trademark infringement action. Client was sued after having been sold counterfeit Windex, Clorox and Mop & Glo. Case settled with plaintiffs and client being paid by counterfeiter. Client paid nothing and was vindicated in its claim that it was victimized. Client recovered all losses including attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with the three cases over a two and a half year period.

Countdown Clocks, Inc. v. Suncoast Merchandise Corp. Trade Dress claim over the shape of a plastic desk clock. Plaintiff lost on preliminary injunction and elected to dismiss rather than pay client it’s fees and costs.

Sunburst Products v. CYRK International, Inc. Trade Dress and unfair competition action against supplier to Phillip Morris, producer of MARLBORO cigarettes over infringement of design of a waist pack through sale to Philip Morris of waist pack in conjunction with the Marlboro Adventure Team promotion campaign. Tried to jury with jury determining that Sunburst lost profits of $920,000. Judgment for Plaintiff.

Most of our client representation for software clients has been in transactions. However, we have also successfully represented software clients in litigation.

Microsoft v. Wugo Complicated breach of contract, and alleged trademark-counterfeiting matter. Represented defendants and countersued for R.I.C.O. and various other claims. Obtained insurance coverage for defendant, and the case was settled for a fraction of the initial demand, with the insurance carrier paying the bulk of the settlement.

We can obtain seizures of the infringing goods, often without prior notice to the infringers. Infringing goods can be ordered destroyed and injunctions and damages can be obtained. Infringers can also be required to turn over their profits and pay your fees. Powerful tools indeed. We can also make sure you are not fall victim to the.

The firm has substantial copyright litigation expertise, both in enforcing and defending copyright infringement claims.

O’Well Novelty v. Department 56 Declaratory Relief action to establish non-infringement of copyrights claimed in porcelain houses. Case settled without an acknowledgment of any liability and without any payment to claimant.

Sexsea, Inc. v. Gadzooks, Inc. et al. Copyright infringement case. Obtained final judgment including an order permitting the client to seek recovery of its attorney’s fees and costs on behalf of defendant arising out of the design of novelty t-shirts.

We can help clients establish contract compliance programs to insure you get what you deserve and don’t run afoul of your obligations. As in all business transactions, disputes sometimes lead to litigation

Microsoft v. Wugo Complicated breach of contract, and alleged trademark-counterfeiting matter. Represented defendants and countersued for R.I.C.O. and various other claims. Obtained insurance coverage for defendant, and the case was settled for a fraction of the initial demand, with the insurance carrier paying the bulk of the settlement.

Our litigators have represented clients from a wide variety of industries in federal and state court cases involving the full range of antitrust and unfair competition issues throughout the United States and in foreign jurisdictions.

We have the resources necessary to deal with most antitrust or unfair competition cases. Even the larges of law firms typically only staff cases with two or three lawyers; we can more than match their capabilities because our attorneys have the knowledge of the subject area, the experience to work as a team and the stamina to take on whatever the opposition shells out. No larger law firm has ever out-litigated The Soni Law Firm.

In Re Certain Radios and Components Thereof - Section 337 Proceedings before the International Trade Commission. Obtained favorable result for client in alleged patent and trademark infringement case concerning radio design.

Learning Group v. Ziff Communications Represented plaintiff in an action for violation of a non-compete and non-solicitation agreement by Ziff’s employment of Learning Group’s president of its French affiliate. Settled on plaintiff’s terms.

Sunburst Products v. CYRK International, Inc. Trade Dress and unfair competition action against supplier to Phillip Morris, producer of MARLBORO cigarettes over infringement of design of a waist pack through sale to Philip Morris of waist pack in conjunction with the Marlboro Adventure Team promotion campaign. Tried to jury with jury determining that Sunburst lost profits of $920,000. Judgment for Plaintiff.

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Executive Life Ins. Co. Represented bank as holder of two deeds of trust in rehabilitation proceedings of Executive Life Ins.

Confidential v. Confidential Partnership dissolution and accounting. Successfully defended claims arising out of dissolution of medical partnership seeking over $1,500,000 in alleged under payments to departing partner; obtained judgment in favor of client and against the claimant for $177,114.24, as well as an award of attorneys fees’ and costs in the amount of $241,457.41

Confidential v. Confidential Arbitration re Partnership mismanagement. and misappropriation of partnership funds and assets. Case settled with mismanaging partner withdrawing from partnership and relinquishing all interest in the partnership and its substantial real property assets

Donathan v. State Industries Obtained partial summary judgment and then quickly and easily settled the matter strongly in favor of the client in a product liability case.

Newport Sports Corporation v. Tehrani Foreclose action on a security interest in personal property related to the $2,417,000 sale of the Newport Beach Tennis Club. Obtained a judgment for client after reversal on appeal by a 3-0 decision.

J. Lamb v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company Insurance coverage case. Obtaining a published opinion from the appellate court which re-emphasized "duty to defend" principles applicable to all "advertising injury" coverage within comprehensive general liability insurance policies.

Lebas Fashion Imports of USA, Inc. v. ITT Hartford Ins. Group Insurance coverage action. Served as counsel for the American Intellectual Property Law Association as Amici Curiae for Plaintiff in case establishing a potential for coverage and duty of defense of trade dress infringement claims under advertising injury coverage.

We also can negotiate franchise, dealership and distribution agreements and advise clients in regard to dealer termination cases. If necessary, we can bring our considerable litigation experience to bear in resolving franchise disputes.

The following are a sample of our International Trade Law Program cases:

In Re Certain Radios and Components Thereof - Section 337 Proceedings before the International Trade Commission. Obtained favorable result for client in alleged patent and trademark infringement case concerning radio design.

Joshua Greene | President of the Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc.

Surjit, is excellent because of his perspective of life and his knowledge of the law. His approach, which is to evaluate a situation from all sides before deciding on the action. .... He also has a business savvy marketing talent that I find to be rare in an attorney. I welcome his ideas and suggestions in business as well as in legal representation. he also has a great team that all have different specialties of the law which makes the firm an asset to my business and it’s future.

President | Pacific Licensing

Surj Soni and all of the other lawyers on his team at the Soni Law Firm never let up. Surj Soni was successful in defending our case before the Federal Courts because of his ability to not only think within the confines of the law, but to also challenge traditional thinking with a rational and logical approach to the issues. 3) I have no hesitation in recommending Surj. He is one of the brightest people I know and, in my experience, completely scrupulous. He has a good sense of humor and is a pleasure to work with, as well as being formidably competent.

Chairman | Reuben, a Patent Application Client

I have no hesitation in recommending The Soni Law Firm. They have some of the brightest attorneys I know and, in my experience, completely scrupulous. It is a pleasure to work with them, as well as being formidably competent.

Strategic Legal Thinker | Tom, Intellectual Property Client

Surjit is a rare counselor. He deals with legal matters sensibly and realistically. He has a very pragmatic approach to the area of intellectual property, which can be a confusing morass of laws varying significantly across legal jurisdictions.

Surjit has the experience, knowledge, and good judgment —plus a sense of intellectual curiosity too.

President | Loreley, a Contracts Client

The Soni Law Firm is a group of professionals that are committed to meeting their client’s expectations. Everyone on their team created a unique experience of helpfulness and commitment to us. ...We were not alone. Every conversation was directed to reaching the end result of "winning" the case.

President | a Business Client

Very reliable and gets the job done. Will not take NO for an answer. Very knowledgable and thorough with his work. Will leave no stone unturned.. get to every option available.

Retired Business Owner | Jeff, a Intellectual Property client

The Soni Law Firm defended my company and me, personally in two complicated intellectual property lawsuits with several claims of patent and trademark infringement. In both cases, all charges were dismissed and one of the plaintiff’s patents was invalidated by the court. Intellectual property is probably the most complicated part of civil law and Mr. Soni proved he is an expert.

President | a Contracts Client

I highly recommend Surj and his team for any intellectual property matters you may have. We have worked with many different lawyers in different matters and have never had the comfort level or security that we have when working with Surj. His knowledge of the law, his ability to be able to explain cases to a lay-person and his court room demeanor are absolutely incredible.

Greatest lawyer ever had the pleasure to work with | Dilip, a Intellectual Property client

Surjit helped us refine and clarify our consulting contracts. His help was valuable in protecting our intellectual property while providing our clients the value they expect for their investment. Clearly having knowhow in the IP arena, Surjit was able to respond to our requests quickly and professionally. We felt we have received good value for our costs and have established a relationship we could rely upon in the future.

President | Harpal, a Antitrust Client

Surjit is an excellent trial lawyer with an exceptional grasp of the copyright/trade law. He has a unique ability to see the various angles of a lawsuit and advises his client accordingly. One of his biggest strength is his attention to detail and his ability to anticipate the moves of the opposition well in advance.

Vice President and General Counsel | Jim, a Trademark Client

Mr. Soni is a very bright, capable trial lawyer. He is a very experience, seasoned and practical litigator. He can handle very large and complex litigation matters involving numerous parties represented by "elite" firms where the stakes are high and also small matters on a budget. Mr. Soni represented our company in a complex IP litigation where we were a defendant accused of a parade of horrible things. At the end we prevailed recovering both our attorney fees and shared damages with plaintiffs. Outstanding job. Mr. Soni can and does know how to try cases not just paper them like many lawyers who call them selves litigators. I would highly recommend Mr. Soni.