craZboy557 is an eight year old. Whenever he writes a response, he decides other peoples goals and reasons for himself, and heres a scenario:

this is normal logic-i start a topic-person comes and gives negative feedback in comparison to something else-i spark flaws in what they are comparing to and give examples-they understand and acknowledge by apologizing and giving some positive feedback on other examples

this is craZboy557 logic-i start a topic-person comes and gives negative feedback in comparison to something else-i spark flaws in what they are comparing to and give examples-they do not understand and reflect a similar example that both in comparison share, saying that what i described as what they thought was better was what i thought about my own side a of comparison-i'm left dumbstruck due to how unlogical it remarks the very integers of my common sense