You are here

Voters open to candidates without deep religious faith

NEW YORK — Religion’s role in politics and public policy is in the spotlight heading toward the midterm elections, yet relatively few Americans consider it crucial that a candidate be devoutly religious or share their religious beliefs, according to a poll released Tuesday by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

Just 25 per cent of Americans say it’s very or extremely important that a candidate has strong religious beliefs, according to the poll. Only 19 per cent consider it very or extremely important that a candidate shares their own beliefs, and nearly half say that’s not very important or not important at all.

Still, most Americans see a role for religion in shaping public policy. A solid majority of Americans ‚Äî 57 per cent ‚Äî want the influence of religion on government policy to extend beyond traditional culture-war issues and into policies addressing poverty. Americans are more likely to say religion should have at least some influence on poverty than on abortion (45 per cent) or LGBT issues (34 per cent).

There is little public support for the campaign by some conservative religious leaders ‚Äî backed by President Donald Trump ‚Äî to allow clergy and religious organizations to endorse political candidates while retaining their tax-exempt status. Such a change is opposed by 53 per cent of Americans and supported by 13 per cent. The rest expressed no opinion.

Trump’s stance on political endorsements by clergy is one of many reasons he has retained strong support among white evangelical Christians, despite aspects of his behaviour and personal life that don’t neatly align with Christian values. The AP-NORC poll found that 7 in 10 white evangelical Protestants say they approve of Trump.

The importance of a candidate’s religious faith varied across religious and political groups.

Among white evangelical Protestants, 51 per cent consider it very or extremely important that a candidate has strong religious beliefs. An additional 25 per cent think it’s moderately important. Far fewer Catholics and white mainline Protestants considered this important.

Roughly two-thirds of Republicans said it’s at least moderately important that a candidate has strong religious beliefs, compared with 37 per cent of Democrats.

Jack Kane, an accountant from Key West, Florida, was among the Republican-leaning poll participants who said it wasn’t important to him whether a candidate was deeply religious.

“I’d much rather have a guy run the government and not spend all our money, instead of sounding off on what’s going on in the church or on things like abortion,” said Kane, 65, who describes himself as nonreligious. “Who is Catholic, Jewish, Southern Baptist ‚Äî I could care less, as long as they’re going to carry the torch of freedom.”

Kent Jaquette, a Republican-turned-independent and a former United Methodist pastor who lives near San Antonio, said he does not base his choice of candidates on their religious faith.

“In politics, you need to look at a person where their morals are, where their values are,” he said. “It may or may not have anything to do with their religion.”

Jaquette also questioned the motives of evangelicals who support Trump.

“To me, it’s supporting someone who gives no indication he intends to live a Christian life,” said Jaquette, 63. “I believe that Christians should do things that Christ taught ‚Äî feed the hungry, visit people in jail, help immigrants.”

Veronica Irving, a 55-year-old Roman Catholic Republican who lives near Chicago, says it’s extremely important to her that a politician has strong religious beliefs. She’s disappointed that Trump doesn’t demonstrate this more clearly through his behaviours and actions.

“It’s not about what faith you come from ‚Äî it’s just important that you have faith,” she said.

At the highest levels of political office, it’s still rare for a politician to profess that he or she is an atheist; surveys indicate that roughly 10 per cent of Americans do not believe in a higher power. In recent years, only a small handful of members of Congress have identified themselves as nonbelievers.

However, there is some evidence of increasing acceptance of religious diversity ‚Äî for example, the recent victories by Muslim-American women in Democratic congressional primaries in Michigan and Minnesota.

The AP-NORC poll found broad interest in religion having at least some influence on a range of policy issues.

In addition to the concern about poverty, 49 per cent of Americans want to see religion have some influence on education, 44 per cent on health care policy, 43 per cent on immigration, 38 per cent on gun policy, 36 per cent on income inequality, 34 per cent on foreign policy and 32 per cent on climate change.

From each of the largest religious groups, there was strong support for greater religious influence on poverty policy ‚Äî 71 per cent of white evangelical Protestants, 54 per cent of white mainline Protestants, 75 per cent of nonwhite Protestants and 67 per cent of Catholics.

The Rev. Jim Wallis, founder of the Christian social justice organization Sojourners, said the poll findings signalled a potentially broader and more vibrant role for organized religion in U.S. politics.

“Religious issues are much broader and deeper and different from the issues chosen by the religious right,” he said. “The issues like poverty, immigration, what happens to the homeless ‚Äî those are becoming the moral and political and voting issues for more and more Christians.”

The findings were welcomed by Maureen Malloy Ferguson, a senior policy adviser for The Catholic Association, which depicts its mission as “being a faithful Catholic voice in the public square.”

“It’s encouraging to see that so many Americans recognize that religion can be a force for good in society,” she said.

However, attorney Emilie Kao, a religious-freedom expert with the conservative Heritage Foundation, questioned whether faith-based organizations might face roadblocks in trying to expand their role in social services. Some jurisdictions, she noted, have sought to exclude religious organizations from various activities, such as adoption and foster care, because of opposition to same-sex marriage and other beliefs.