T R U T O NbyKalman
Klim
BrattmanGive
me the simplest form of
matter
and motion,
and I will construct, out of them, the world of
Nature.

"Give me matter,
and I will construct a world out of it."Immanuel
Kant, Kant's Cosmology("Universal
Natural History and Theory Of
Heavens")

5.
On Energy, Mass, and the Formation of
Embryonal Nature (Embryna)

In
the previous page, we have introduced
Prena
as the primeval given
entity consisting of various xenobase (XB)
blocks gliding at various constant speeds, in
various directions, in the surrounding
void
(VO)
space. That linear translatory (LITRA)
motions of those moving objects are representing
the givenprimeval dynamics (PRIDON)
that originates in Prena. LITRA
motion
is thus an integral part of Prena.

As
ingredients, the xenobase (XB) was considered to
be the givenprimeval material ingredient, while the void
(VO) was considered to represent the
givenprimeval non-material component. We have
called prematter(pM)that primeval admixture of xenobase (XB) and
void (VO). Finally, we have called
baseholon
(BHL)
a XB-block with holes of void in it that were
called holeons
(Øs).

Continuing
now with our examination of Prena, we recognize
that the only events that are possible to exist
there, are the collisions
of its various XB-blocks. Thus, if anything is
to be created in Prena, then the
Collision
must be the Creator therein as there is nothing
else out there that could exist in creating
anything. The acts of creation that collision
would create ought to be of two kinds:

one,
that can produce
stable,
self-sustained states of existence
that exist after the cause that
created them is no longer present,
and

the
other, that can produce
unstable
states of existence that cannot
sustain themselves once they have
been created.

In our attempt to build up Nature from the
Principles of TRUTON, our primary
interest, of course, is in the self-sustained,
stable acts of Creation. In Nature, only
material
entitiesandmotions
can be created. They are distinct acts of
physical creations separated by their own
independent existence and, united by their
symbiotic interdependence as no one can exist
without the other. Notwithstanding their
distinctiveness, they embrace nevertheless
certain common characteristics that are at the
substratum of all Creations as recognized
in

.
1.
A
stable, self-sustained inanimate state
of existence that was created has the
natural tendency to stay idle and
preserve its created state of existence
barring the existence of an active
undercutting agent. We call that
characteristic the
preservation
tendency mark of creation
(PT-UMOC)..
2.
To
a created stable, self-sustained
inanimate state of existence, we can
associate, by PT-MOSC, a
resistance
to change
(RETOC)
that is limited in strength and, call
that characteristic the
resistance
limit mark of creation
(RL-UMOC)..
3.
A
non-null state of existence (created or
given) can never ever be able to be
transformed or reduced into a null
state of existence as there is no
transformation or process that can
achieve that end. That is to say that
an existing non-null state can never
ever be made to disappear and thus be
reduced or transformed into
Nothingness--an
entity devoid of everything but its own
existence and, whose "fabric" is void
(VO). We call that characteristic, the
permanent
existential mark of creation
(PE-UMOC)..
4.
There
is no physical transformation in Nature
or anywhere else that can convert
Nothingness
into a non-null state of existence.
That is to say that a no-null state of
existence can never be created out of
the null state of existence. We call
that characteristic, the
substantive
foundational mark of creation
(SF-UMOC)..
5.
A
material state of existence that was
able to be created in one place, can be
created in a multitude of other places
of similar conditions as there is no
rationale from barring that to happen.
We call that characteristic, the
multitude
existence mark of creation
(ME-UMOC)..
6.
A
material state of existence can never
ever be characterized by physical
parameters or processes whose values
are infinite. All physical parameters
and processes of a creation have finite
values. No physical parameter of a
material creation can increase or
decrease in its value indefinitely. No
physical processes can exist in Nature
without a finite end. We call that
finitude characteristic, the
finite
value mark of creation
(FV-UMOC).

Now, to the ultimate marks of creation
(UMOCs) expressed in the above
4th UTPOT, we add below these
remarks:.
Remark
1: The preservation tendency mark
of creation (PT-UMOC)
assures that barring the existence of
an undermining agent, a newly formed
state of existence will preserve
indefinitely its new acquired state of
existence. In particular, we note the
preservation of the xenobase (XB) is
implemented through BAREC..
Remark
2: The resistance limit mark of
creation (RL-UMOC) implies the
existence of a concealed resisting
(CORE)force to change its
status and which when applied to motion
leads to the concept of inertia
and of the existence of an endowed
inertial force (INFO).

For
linear motions, we can talk
about linear inertia
that become visible in an
accelerated or decelerated
linear motion.

For
rotational motions, we can
talk about rotational
inertia (known also as
the moment of
inertia) that becomes
visible through the effects
of the well known
radialcentrifugal (CF)
force and of the less known
transversal
Coriolis and
Euler
forces.

Contrary
to the current ill-existing
nomenclature, these
concealed
resisting
(CORE)
forces are not
fictional, fictitious, or
apparent as they are REAL
indeed existing independently
from our own
existence!
(BTW,
Physics does not deal with
fictional, imaginary entities
and concepts as they are not
part of its
studies!).As
motion is a REAL phenomenon
being independent from our own
existence, so is the
INFO
that emerges from motion. The
real existence of
INFOsurfaces
when motion transforms from a
constant velocity to a
variable one --be it a
variation in direction or a
variation in speed..The
recognition that motion is
endowed from its birth with a
force --the inertial force
(INFO)
brings us to the monumental
unifying recognition of Nature
vested into

The
FourthFoundational
Universal Recognition
Of
Nature
(4thFURON): Force
as the Ultimate
Substratum of
Nature

Force
by being the integral
part of both
mattter
and
motion
represents the
ultimate
substratum of Nature,
with matter being
endowed with the
compressional
force
(COFO)
while motion being
endowed with the
inertial
force
(INFO).

.
Remark
3: The permanent existential mark
of creation (PE-UMOC),
assures that Nature, as a whole, will
never ever diminish its arena of
existence as no part of Nature can
disappear and be transformed into
Nothingness. The permanency and the
integrity of Nature's arena of
existence is therefore firmly
secured..
Remark
4: By the substantive foundational
mark of creation (SF-UMOC),
it follows that Einstein's
relativistic
mass
formulated in his Special Theory of
Relativity is an impossibility to exist
being thus a lunacy devoid of any
sense. Mass cannot be created out of
Nothingness through motion or through
any other process..
Remark
5: By the recognition of multiple
places of existence as noted above
under ME-UMOC,
we recognize that isolated parcels
of Nature (PARONs) separated
by the Nothingness medium are in
existence. That recognition is able to
provide for us with the most general
representation of Nature --that of
being an aggregate of
PARONs..
Remark
6: By the finitude,
i.e., by the finite value mark
of creation (FV-UMOC),
it follows that the current accepted
Big-Bang cosmological model that
considers that our Universe emerged
somehow, willy-nilly, out of some point
of infinite mass, density and
temperature is nonsensical and
delusional on a number of fronts.

While
here, let us note now that in
Prena, the sole primeval
physical parameter in
existence is the density. And
that implies that out of the
density concept, all other
physical parameters and states
of existence must be created
or derived from. We mark that
remarkable recognition
into

The
material density, by
being the sole
primeval physical
parameter of
Prena,
stands therefore at
the foundation of all
other physical
parameters to be born
out of
Prena
(such as temperature,
gravity, etc.). In
this respect
therefore, the
material density
represents the
ultimate physical
parameter from where
all other physical
parameters and states
of existence must be
created, rooted, or
derived
from.

By the finite value
mark of creation
(FV-UMOC),
it follows that the
material density nor
any other physical
parameter can reach
the infinite value
--a concept of
Mathematics that has
no counterpart or
meaning in the
physical realm of
Nature. Only to
non-physical mental
concepts or entities
(such as the
Space
or Time)
we can associate, in
a meaningful manner,
indefinite
parameters.

The
simple recognition that an increment in density
(and nothing else) of the xenobase (XB)
substance will generate --through compression--
all the available new qualitative states of
existence of the compressed xenobase (cXB),
makes us realize that the variation in one
direction of a physical parameter will
eventually lead to new qualitatively material
states of existence. A qualitatively new state
will "pop-out" from the old state as a
result that its physical parameter will fall
outside the range of resistance of
RETOC
associated with that old state of existence. We
mark this central recognition of how a
new state of existence is being born out of an
old one in

A
physical parameter of a particular
state of existence by continuously
increasing or decreasing its value
will eventually reach a point where
its value will fall outside the
range of resistivity or
tolerance of that particular
state. When that happens, a new
qualitatively state of existence
will emerge. Thus, always a new
state of existence is created
through an abrupt jump or
saltation.

Sub-Remark A: In Evolutionary
Biology, this leaping (or the
pop-up) principle represents its
pillar in understanding the
evolution and formation of a new
species where the gradual cumulative
trait in one single direction will
lead into the "popping-up" of
a new species. The evolutionary
"leaps" are therefore a
straightforward consequence of this
principle and it represents the
cornerstone of understanding how new
species are being formed: not
through a linear continuous
transformation, but through
evolutionary "jumps" or "leaps" or
"saltations" as recognized first in
1972 by the American paleontologists
Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould
of Harvard University.

Sub-Remark B: The first recognition
that in general "quantitative
change leads to qualitative
change" was done by the great
German idealist philosopher Georg
Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel who in
1874 published the Encyclopaedia
of the Philosophical Sciences
where in its section "The Logic," he
gave this beautiful example with
respect to the consequences of the
variation of temperature for
water:

"...
the temperature of water
is, in the first place,
a point of no
consequence in respect
of its liquidity: still
with the increase or
diminution of the
temperature of the
liquid water, there
comes a point where this
state of cohesion
suffers a qualitative
change, and the
water is converted into
steam or ice."
[Underline
supplied.]

.However,
Hegel
considered all
that
recognition as
being a Law of
Logic or
Thought rather
than a Law of
Nature. It was
the philosophy
of Karl Marx
and Friedrich
Engels that
reversed
completely that
dialectics
created by
Hegel and
transformed it
into a
materialistic
dialectics
where Hegel's
laws became
laws of Nature
rather than
laws of
Thought.
Indeed, Karl
Marx in his
Das
Kapital,
vol.1 noted
that Hegel's
idealism "is
nothing else
than the
material world
reflected by
the human mind,
and translated
into forms of
thought"
turning thus
Hegel's
dialectics
"upside down."

Changing direction, and turning our attention to
the motion
--the other primeval given
ingredient of Prena,
we enunciate now

Material
objects, in an absolute vacuum
(AVA) medium, moving at a
constant speed or at rest,
have the natural tendency to
preserve their constant state
of motion or rest,
continuously resisting any
change of their existing state
of uniform motion or
rest.

Proof:
Motion, by being an act of
real creation, and
being part of Prena's
PRIDON,
will subscribe to all marks of
creation (UMOCs)
enunciated above in the
4th UTPOT. In particular,
from the preservation tendency
mark of creation
(PT-UMOC)
and its resistance to change
(RETOC),
the Principle of Universal
Inertia (PUI) is a
straightforward
consequence.

QED.

Historical
Remarks and Observations on
PPOM:

Aristotle

.1.
Some 2000 years ago, Aristotle
(circa 335 BC to
322 BC), who vehemently
rejected the existence of an
absolute vacuum (AVA) in
Nature, noted this much in his
book of Physics:

19.
(4) "In a void
there is no reason
why a thing should
stop here
rather than
there; so if
it moves at all, it
will move for ever."
And,22. (5)
"Things are supposed
to move into a void
because it is
yielding; but a void
is equally yielding
everywhere, so that
there should
be movement in every
direction."

.2.
Many centuries latter, after
the works of Nicolaus
Copernicus and Galileo
Galilei, Isaac Newton in his
seminal Principia
(Definition III) defined
inertia, if our reading is
correct, to be
an
innate property of
matter
as follows:

"The
vis insita, or
innate
force of
matter,
is a power of
resisting, by which
every body, as much
as in it lies,
continues in its
present state,
whether it be of
rest, or of moving
uniformly forwards in
a right line."
[Underline
supplied.]

Newton
considered inertia
(if our reading above is
correct) to be an "innate
force" of matter. Let us make
this point clear: matter does
not possess such a thing.
Inertia, in fact, is not a
property of matter, but is a
property of motion.
Motion
and not matter is endowed with
that "innate
force."
While it is true that both
matter and motion subscribe to
the same tendency of
preserving their respective
states (PT-UMOC)
and, that both have an
inherent resistance to change
(RETOC)
--they nevertheless reside on
totally different plateaus of
existence and, as such, they
never ever can be interchanged
one with another in a
meaningful way. This very
point is again emphasized in a
subsequent page in
here.

.3.
Another attribute given to the
inertial force is that it is
not a real force, but that is
a fictitious force! For
starters, let us again make
this clear: Physics does not
deal with fictitious or
phantom forces or entities!!
Those type of subjects are
outside of the realm of
Physics or of any Natural
Sciences. All the so-called
pseudo-forces are real
forces that exist in Nature.
They are not fictional,
imaginary entities. Isaac
Newton brilliantly described
the inertial force as a
real force with a dual
characteristic --that of
resistance and of an
impulse as follows:

Newton's
Commentary on Inertia
Posted in his
Definition
III

"This
force is
always
proportional
to the body
whose force
it is and
differs
nothing from
the
inactivity
of mass, but
in our
manner of
conceiving
it. A body,
from the
inert nature
of matter,
is not
without
difficulty
put out of
its state of
rest or
motion. Upon
which
account,
this vis
insita
may, by a
most
significant
name, be
called
inertia
(vis
inertiæ)
or force of
inactivity.
But a body
only exerts
this force
when another
force,
impressed
upon it,
endeavors to
change its
condition;
and the
exercise of
this force
may be
considered
as
bothresistanceandimpulse;
it is
resistance
so far as
the body,
for
maintaining
its present
state,
opposes the
force
impressed;
it is
impulse
so far as
the body, by
not easily
giving way
to the
impressed
force of
another,
endeavors to
change the
state of
that other.
Resistance
is usually
ascribed to
bodies at
rest, and
impulse
to those in
motion; but
motion and
rest, as
commonly
conceived,
are only
relatively
distinguished;
nor are
those bodies
truly at
rest, which
commonly are
taken to be
so."
[Underline supplied.]

.4.
Finally, we know what inertia
is. It is not an
attribute of matter as
apparently Newton considered
to be, but is an attribute of
motion as derived in
PPOM
and amplified in the above
Remark 2.
However, let us note that
therein inertia was considered
to exist with respect to an
absolute vacuum (AVA) medium
that was well understood back
to the time of
Aristotle.

R.
Feynman

.How
inertia is being transmitted
from an absolute vacuum medium
into the cosmic material
medium of
Nature?
is a question that needs yet
to be answered..Richard
Feynman
in his book "The Character
Of Physical Law" (MIT
Press, 1965, p. 19) noted:

"The
reason why
[cosmic]
things coast for ever
has never been found
out. The law of
inertia [in
the cosmic
space] has no
known
origin."
[Underline supplied.]

Thus, Feynman's question as to
WHY objects coast forever in
the cosmic space of Nature
(that is far from being an
absolute vacuum medium), is a
question that has yet to
receive its answer. And that
subject is to be treated in a
subsequent page after we have
identified the material nature
of the cosmic
space.

On
the Energy Concept

.The
concept of energy -- has been indeed an
intriguing concept that has baffled physicists,
other scientists, philosophers and thinkers for
quite some time, being unresolved, in fact, to
this very day. That state of incertitude was
perhaps best described by the noted late Physics
Nobel Laureate Professor Richard Feynman (photo
here
and above) who noted this in his famous
Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley
Publishing Company, 1963) in Section 4-1
entitled "What Is Energy?," as
we quote:

"Energy
has a large number of different forms,
and there is a formula for each one.
These are: gravitational energy,
kinetic energy, heat energy, elastic
energy, electrical energy, chemical
energy, radiant energy, nuclear energy,
mass energy. If we total up the
formulas for each of these
contributions, it will not change
except for energy going in and out. It
is important to realize that in physics
today, we have no knowledge of what
energy is."

Asides from elucidating what energy
is, another fundamental line of
inquiry that comes up is this one:

All
forms of energy that have been
identified in Nature must arguably have
a common source of
primeval
energy (PRIEN)
as
Nature's energy, pursuant to
the
substantive foundational mark of
creation (SF-UMOC),
could not have been created or infused
out of nothingness(an
entity devoid of everything, but its
own existence).
And
the place to look for that
PRIEN
must be, no other, than
Prena
--the
state of
the
preexisting Nature.

So, as you can see, we have a full plate in
front of us!

Currently, energy
is being defined as the "ability"to do work or create heat. Well, that
definition of energy is not acceptable on the
grounds that it lacks any physical substratum
being par excellence a non-physical
definition that needs to reside outside of the
realm of Physics. Indeed, the "ability" or
"disability" to do something cannot stand in
lieu of a physical parameter, property, or
entity. As such, energy cannot be defined as an
ability of some sort, but it must be
defined as being something else having a
physical origin and connotation.
Therefore, our quest in elucidating the energy
concept must be centered in discovering its
physicality that must exist and, as such,
it need not be embedded or associated with our
mental existence.

!PASS
WITH
MUCH
CARE

.

We
begin our quest in elucidating the physical
nature of the primeval
energy (PRIEN)
by noting first that the Collision
(the ultimate master agent of creation), which
is a certain natural occurrence in
Prena,
carries with it a hit force, called hitoforce
(hF). That hitoforce
(hF),
upon impact of a xenobase
(XB)
block collision, will not vanish transforming
into nothingness,
but, by Newton's First
Law Of Motion (FLOM),
it will transform into an
inertial
force (INFO)
of impingement. Now, depending of the particular
circumstance, an INFOcan
EITHER generate a deflection of the
stricken XB-block
--when that block opposes no resistance to
motion, OR generate a qualitatively new
mass of the XB-block
--a compressed mass (COMA) when the
stricken block is unmovable.

As
such,

We
call theprimeval
energy (PRIEN)the physical resultant of the
transmission of an
inertial
force(INFO)
derived from Prena's
primeval XB-blocks
collisions.

Thus,
as already recognized, an
INFO
will produce a deflection of a
XB-block
that has no resistance to motion,
generating as such a
kinetic
energy of motion
(KEOM)
and, it will produce a
compressional
mass (COMA)
when
the stricken XB-block
resist motion being unmovable. In that
latter case, INFO
will produce a
compressional
energy (COEN),
called
in TRUTON the
ergoenergy
(erE),
that transform the stricken mass into a
qualitatively new mass-substance that
is endowed with
COEN
and called
ergomass
(erM).

We
say that an
ergomass
(erM)
is mass-substance infused with
ergoenergy
(erE)
and, define an ergovolume
(erVOL) as a volume
infused with
ergoenergy
(erE).
And when that volume is a
vacuum, the corresponding
ergovolume
(erVOL)is
called
ergovoid
(erV).

Additional
Notes:1.
From PRIEN,
the physical nature of
energy is fully
established. The
inertial
force
(INFO)
carries with it an inertial
energy (INEN) that, as
seen above, is manifesting its
existence either as a kinetic
energy of motion
(KEOM)
or
as a compressional energy
(COEN).

2.
The
primal
energy (PRIEN)
concept
just introduced has at its
substratum the recognition
that by the
permanent
existential mark of creation
(PE-UMOC),
a
hitoforce
(hF)
once it was created, cannot
vanish and transform into
nothingness
--an entity devoid of
everything, but its own
existence. That is to say that
the physical
resultant of transmission
of a hitoforce (hF), that
defines the substratum
of PRIEN,
can never ever be a null or a
non-existing
entity.

G.
W.
Leibnitz

3.
Using in a
way the lingo
employed by
Gottfried Wilhekm
Leibnitz, the
resultant of
an INFO
transmission is said
to be infused with an
underneath inertial
"vis-viva"
living force that
can generate
either a
kinetic
energy of motion
(KEOM)
or
a
compressional
energy
(COEN),
akaergoenergy
(erE),
of
a newly created
compressed
mass
(COMA),
akaergomass
(erM).

Note:
That dual
nomenclature
COMA
-erM
and COEN-erEreflects
the dual facets of
the energy
concept.

The study of the primeval
ergoenergy
(erE)
that emerges in Prena
is essential in the deciphering the Nature's
underlying base platform of operation.
And
that is because, energy (which springs from that
base-level platform) is the backbone of Nature
being in fact the motor that fuels its evolution
and development.

Let us begin with this primal study of the
fabric of energy by noting that an
ergomass
(erM)
is a brute mass infused with
ergoenergy
(erE).
We call ergosea (erS) the arena of
existence of the ergoenergy
(erE)
within ergomass
(erM).

The primal ergoenergy
(erE)
in Prena
emerged as the resultant of an infused
compressional
force
of impingement into a
xenobase
(XB)
mass that opposes resistance to motion. We can
talk then about the strength (or
the power) of the
ergoenergy
(erE)
that corresponds to the strength or the
power of the generating
hitoforce
(hF).

.
The
compression of
xenobase
(XB)
generates a qualitatively new state
--the xenofluid
(XF)
state. The hitoforce, in that case, has
converted itself into a
compressional force that created
the XF-mass. We say that a
XF-mass
is a XB-block infused with a
compressional
force
that is construed to be a form of
field
energycalled
ergofield (erF) that can also be
viewed as a dispersedergoforce (erF)..
The
compression of a
xenobase
(XB)
mass cannot go indefinitely, as it will
exist a maximum finite limit of
compression when the compressed
xenobase (or the compressed xenofluid)
will transform into a new state called,
as introduced, the
xenorigid
(XR)..There,
in the xenorigid
(XR),
its ergoenergy
(erE)
is said to be locked-in and call that
locked-in ergoenergy, the ergolock
(erLK). The
xenorigid
(XR)
therefore is said to be endowed with
locked-in ergoenergy.

The
ergofield
(erF),
i.e., that is ingrained into the xenofluid (XF)
is responsible for creating the XF's tendency to
decompress and diffuse to a so-called
baselevel (BALE) state called the
ergobase (erB) state that is the state of
the xenobase
(XB).
The motor of that tendency is therefore the
xenofluid's ingrained
ergoforce
(erF)
that plays also the role of FODEP.

We
call that natural tendency of the
xenofluid (XF) to decompress to its
ergobase
(erB)
state,
therenormalization
(RENO) property of XF which, by the
way, has nothing to do with the
renormalization of Quantum Field
theory.

The role of the ergobase
(erB)
is paramount indeed as it represents
the
base platform
from where theergoenergy
(erE)
is
emerging.

In
the xenofluid's phase of natural decompression,
its stored ergoenergy
(erE)
will diffuse until it reaches the
ergobase
(erB)
state transforming the xenofluid (XF) into the
xenobase (XB) state of existence.

To
conclude, we note





i)
That the
ergoenergy
(erE)
and the
ergobase
(erB)
are said to be the energy
images(or
better,the ergo
images) of the
xenofluid
(XF)
and
xenobase
(XB),
respectively;
and

ii)
That we can view compression
as infused ergoenergy
and decompression as
diffused
ergoenergy.

and recognize also thatiii)
To the density of
the
xenofluid
(XF)
we can associate the densilevel
(dL) concept as being the level of
its density. Because the fabric of XF
is ingrained with ergoenergy (erE), it
follows that to the XF's densilevel
(dL) we can associate the
ergodensity (erD) concept of the
corresponding ergolevel (erL) as
being the strength level of XF's
compression. When that level of
compression is null, we get the null
ergolevel (erL) corresponding to the
xenobase (XB). We can write that as
erL(XB)=0.

Remark:
We note that the
ergoenergy (erE) of the
xenofluid (XF) is directly
proportional with its density,
increasing or decreasing in
the same rapport with the
increase or decrease of its
density. Furthermore, we note
that when the xenofluid
decompresses completely and
transforms into xenobase (XB),
the corresponding ergoenergy
(erE) is said to have reached
its bottom null state --the
called
ergobase
(erB)
state.

We call that
natural tendency of the xenofluid (XF)
to decompress to its
ergobase
(erB)
state,
therenormalization
(RENO) property of XF which, by the
way, has nothing to do with the
renormalization of Quantum Field
theory.

Continuing, we note that there is another
recognition that needs to be made --namely, the
recognition that a hitoforce (hF) upon impact on
a XB-block that opposes no resistance to motion,
it will not travel with, be attached to, or be
imbedded or infused into the stricken XB-block.
That recognition was most eloquently articulated
by Newton, when explaining inertia,
in his seminal Principia (Definition IV,
ibidem),
where he noted:

"This
force consists in the action only, and
remains no longer in the body when the
action is over. For a body maintains
every new state it acquires, by its
inertia only."

.Remark:
It is important to stress and
differentiate between the case when the
XB-block opposes and resist motion and
the case when it is not.In
the former case, when resistance to
motion does exist, Newton assertion
that the force "remains no longer in
the body" is no longer correct as the
hitoforce (hF), as we have seen, stays
now in the body and transforms itself
into
ergoenergy (erE)
and the body's mass is being
transformed into a new type of mass
called ergomass
(erM).

What
then it will happen to that detached
hitoforce
(hF)?As already noted, we know from the
permanent
existential mark of creation
(PE-UMOC)
that something that was created (in this
case, the hitoforce) cannot vanish and
transform into nothing. Then, in this
case,.Into
what that hitoforce (hF) will be transformed
into? --is the converted question that is
now facing us.

Well,
the answer is that the separated hitoforce
(hF) from the stricken XB-block will diffuse
into the surrounding vacuum generating a
force-field, called
ergofield
(erF),
until it reaches its
baselevel
(BALE)
state called basefield
(BAFI).

That
ergofield (erF) in a void medium, called
ergovoid (erV), will decompress to the
lowest finite base limit level of
decompression called, the
ergobase
(erB)level. The ergofield (erF) at its
ergobase (erB) level of existence is called
basefield (BAFI). The extent of the
created basefield (BAFI) is function of the
strength of the hitoforce (hF): the greater
its magnitude is, the greater the extent of
the created basefield is going to be.

We
call now the xenovoid (XV),
an absolute vacuum (AVA)
infused with a
basefield
(BAFI).
Thus, now we can talk about
"clouds"
of
XV
that are "floating" in
AVA.

PASSWITH
MUCHCARE

basenet

A
fundamental characteristic
of a basefield
(BAFI),
and thus of the new type of
vacuum --the
xenovoid
(XV),
is that, by being at its
lowest attainable stretch,
it can no longer be
decompressed (and thus be
stretched) any furter. That
creates a rather subtle
invisible impenetrable
wall, called basenet
(figure at right), for
any radiation attempting to
propagate in a
xenovoid
(XV).
Such radiation will
splatter on that
basenet
generating a splattered
perpendicular radiation to
the direction of the moving
object that emanates the
radiation.

BAFI
can be compressed but not
decompressed and call
bafiflex that
unilateral flexibility.

Remark:
Let us note that
the
xenobase
(XB)
is also endowed
with the
bafiflex
property.

The "fabric" of the
xenovoid (XV) is thus the
basefield
(BAFI)
that can never ever be able
to be transformed into
Nothingness,
i.e., into a volume
of
absolute
vacuum
(AVA).
And that is because of the
permanent
existential mark of
creation
(PE-UMOC)
which guarantees the
xenovoid's permanent state
of existence.

The
physical existence of the
ergoforce/ergofield
(erF)
introduced above was pioneered by Michael
Faraday and James Clerk Maxwell in
their studies of electromagnetism and
below, we present a succinct historical note
viewed through the lens of TRUTON.

On
the Physical Reality of the
Ergoforce/Ergofield
(erF)

M.
Faraday

Michael
Faraday
was the first, and perhaps the only one, to
recognize of the real
existence
of the force-field polysemy, as a
stand-alone
physical entity, in his studies of the magnetic
and electric force/fields and of their
unification into the electromagnetic
force/fields. In fact, Faraday became more and
more convinced during his life of the
physical
reality
of those 'force fields' whose nature, in the
end, he considered to be a substance of some
sort through which the "lines of force"
(electric or magnetic) show their
existence.

J.
C. Maxwell

On the other hand,
James
Clerk Maxwell
in his famous 4-part paper "On Physical Lines
of Force" that is modeled on the
"lines
of force"
introduced by Faraday, and where the famous
tensor
equations of electromagnetism are being
introduced, would not subscribe to the Faraday's
conjecture of a stand-alone
physical entity for the
force-field
polysemy.

Maxwell
instead, in his approach of finding a tensorial
representation for the transmission of electric
and magnetic forces, considered those
transmissions to be states of stress and strain
that were produced in the assumed aether medium
of Nature.

That
physical reality envisioned by Maxwell,
following into the steps of Faraday, vanished
completely with the advent of
Einstein's
Relativity
which eliminated the existence of the aether
medium altogether and replaced it,
astonishingly, with Nothingness.
With that elimination of a non-void medium of
Nature, as advanced by Einstein
some 100 years ago, Physics has been sucked
in entering into an unfathomable dark path of
the abyss from where now it must find a way
out...

It
is indeed the aim of TRUTON not only
to dethrone the lunatic
Einstein's Relativity,
but also to pull back Physics from
the "Black Hole" that it has fallen
into. Its golden and rather
torturous rational path of
advancement eventually needs to
surface and reign supreme
again...

Viewed
from the vista of TRUTON, both Faraday and
Maxwell exhibited a correct physical
representation of the force-field polysemy with
Maxwell's representation being a direct and
straightforward inference derived from Faraday's
monumental stand-alone
conjecture.

Indeed,
the aether medium that in TRUTON is the
xenofluid (XF) medium exists because it contains
ergoenergy
(erE)
that was infused at XF's birth with the
stand-alone
ergoforce/ergofield (erF). However, the
stand-alone
ergoforce/ergofield (erF) can be infused not
only into a xenobase (XB) block to create the
xenofluid (XF), but it also can be infused into
an absolute void (AVO) that exist in Prena
generating an ergovoid
(erV).
The ergovoid (erV) upon decompression reaching
the base level state transforms itself into a
base level ergovoid (erV) called
xenovoid
(XV).With
that vista, we are able to see now the parity
that exists between the material and
non-material environments as follows:

TRUTON's

In
Prena(devoid of
ergoenergy):

In
Nature(infused with
ergoenergy):

Material

Xenobase
(XB)

Xenofluid(XF)
Xenorigid (XR)

Non-Material

Absolute
Vacuum (AVO)
Xenovoid (XV)

Ergovoid
(erV)

In
TRUTON, to avoid the confusion with the
'field concept' employed in Mathematics, we
shall use, for the
'field'
to be employed in Physics, the terminology of
'ergofield'.
Also to distinguish the concept of
'force'
employed in Mechanics or Mathematics from the
one to be used in Physics, we will use in
here the 'ergoforce'
nomenclature. The
'ergo'
prefix always will have the connotation of
possessing 'energy'.
That "ergo" nomenclature is very much in tune
with Leibnitz's"vis viva" ("living force")
lingo.

In
the classical non-trutonian lingo, the
three (3) resultant acts of creation
springing from the hitoforce (hF) --the
motion, the xenofluid, and the
ergovoid, as diverse as they are, have
a commonality among them, namely, that
they are endowed, at their birth, with
something that is called
primal
energy (PE).
The energy resulted from motion is
called mechanical energy, the
one resulted from xenofluid is called
the material energy, and the one
resulted from the dispersion of force
is called the field
energy.

Thus, in summary, we come to the
recognition that
primal
energy
exists in three (3) basic
forms:


that of a
motion,
called the mechanical energy,
energy of motion, or the
kinetic
energy;
that of a
substance,
called ergosubstance
(ES)
--seated either in the
xenofluid
(XF)
that, if unconstrained, will
free completely its acquired
ergoenergy
(erE)
returning back to its
tensionedbaselevel
(BALE)
state of existence --the
xenobase
(XB),
or in the
xenorigid
(XR)
that entraps and
freezes/immobilizes its
acquired
ergoenergy
(erE)
transforming it into
frozen energy
(FROEN),
and
that of a
field,
called ergofield
(erF)
--seated in the
ergovoid
(erV)
that will diffuse into the
xenovoid
(XV)
state.

Thus, the conversion of a hitoforce
(hF) could be vested in the creation of
a new motion (potential or kinetic)
called the
dynamic
conversion,OR could be vested in the
creation of a field, the
ergofield
(erF),
called the
field
conversion,
that when infused into an absolute
vacuum (AVA) will generate the
xenovoid
(XV) and,
when infused into a xenobase (XB)
generating a
substance
conversion
vested in the creation of a new
substance that is the
xenofluid
(XF)
or the xenorigid
(XR).

Let
us note that the conversion of
a hitoforce (hF) needs not be
confused with its effect that
it can have in various
situations. For instance, the
non-elastic deformations or
the fractures are the
effect-results of a released
energy that need not be
confused with the energy
itself.

Those
three (3) forms in which
primal
energy
can exist
---motion-substance-field--
shows the complex multifaceted
existence of energy.

Additional
Remarks:.The
xenobase
(XB)
mass has been defined as a material continuum of
the lowest existing density that can only be
compressed but not decompressed or stretched. On
the other extreme, we call xenorigid
(XR)
the maximum compressed xenosubstance
(cXS). Collectively, all those three
introduced states
--the
xenobase (XB), xenofluid (XF), and the
xenorigid (XR)
are said to form the states of existence of the
xenosubstance (XS)..Using
the "ergo" terminology that is applicable only
for the compressed
xenosubstance
(cXS),
we get the ergosubstance (ES) with its
states of existence --the ergofluid (EF)
and ergorigid (ER).

[We
note again that the ergoenergy (erE) of
the XB-state
has a null value, i.e.,
erE(XB)=0, being thus in the
ergobase
(erB)
state of
existence.]

.The
extreme states of existence of the
xenosubstance
(XS),
the xenobase
(XB)
--that is the maximum decompressed tensioned
state of the XS and the
xenorigid
(XR)
-- that is the maximum compressed state of XS,
have one common characteristic namely that they
are capable of entrapping (without the
possibility of escape) their acquired
ergoenergy
(erE).

.We
call xentropy that
ironclad-entrapment of ergoenergy
by the tensioned xenobase (XB) and by
the xenorigid (XR). Those two extremes
states of the xenosubstance (XS) freeze
their respective acquired ergoenergies
making them, in both cases, unavailable
to be released..We
can talk thus of the
xentropy
of the
xenobase
called basetropy and, of
thexentropy
of the
xenorigid
called rigitropy. The introduced
frozen
energy (FROEN)
is the result of
xentropy.

Note:
The name
"xentropy"
was borrowed from the entropy
concept of Thermodynamics representing
the "thermodynamic quantity" that is
not available to be converted into
mechanical work by the system's thermal
energy.

After
all this, we mark now our stated recognition on
the energy's multifaceted existence into


A hitoforce upon striking a xenobase
(XB) block will not cease its existence
as it will convert into a
motion,
or into a
substance,
or into a
field.
The transmission of the three (3)
possible conversions of the hitoforce
(hF) will generate three (3) new and
distinct capabilities called
respectively the
mechanical,
the material,
and the
field
energies.
The commonality
of all those three (3) forms of energy
is that they all spring from a
transformed hitoforce that is being
carried on a final resting place of
existence.

Fundamental Clarificatory Remarks:.

H.
Poincaré

H.
Lorentz

As
matter
and motion
concepts cannot possibly be confused
one with another, so are their
corresponding energy concepts --the
substance energy of matter
(aka,
the material
energy)
and the energy of
motion
(aka, the mechanical or kinetic
energy)of a mass. Those two concepts
not only that they cannot possibly be
confused one with another, but also
that they cannot be transposed one into
another..Henri Poincaré's
mass-energy formula
E=mc2 and his
"principle of relativity" of
1904 was lifted in 1905 by
Albert
Einstein
and introduced into his
Special
Theory of Relativity
(STR)
without any reference to
Poincaré's work. No coherent
meaningful physical proof of
that implausible formula was ever been
provided by Einstein nor, for that
matter, by anyone else..
That the (internal, ingrained)
energy
of a block of mass (defined as the
quantity of matter per its volume) can
somehow be calculated from a formula
containing the speed of light
c is to us such an
absurdity that no person, in his/her
normal state of mind, could ever fall
into such an unfathomable abyss..What
possible relationship, correlation or
connection could exist between the
substance energy of a mass and
the speed of
light?To be able to entertain such a
question, one indeed must fall and
enter into the arena of the Absurd as
only there that kind of question can
possible reside.

The mathematical
proof that subsequently
emerged for the noted
mass-energy formula
E=mc2
was
designed for the
kinetic
and not the
material
energy
and, it was based on a
relativistic foundation
initiated by Hendrik
Lorentz incorporating
mentalkinetic
frames of reference. Those
mathematical
transformations performed
through that mental
framework, known as the
Lorentz
transformations, which
Poincaré
considered them to be of
"supreme importance" laid
in fact the foundation for
Poincaré's stated
"principle
of relativity.".That
stated mass-energy
mathematical formula
E=mc2that now
incorrectly is being
attributed to
Einstein
is, at best, a fictitious
mathematical formula
that has nothing to do with
the reality of Nature as it
was derived from
mathematical and not
physical frames of
references that exist only
in our Mind, but absent in
Nature..To
extrapolate a
mathematical result
(derived from a
mentalkinetic
frames of reference
foundation) to a
physical reality
describing Nature is indeed
an act of shear insanity as
the fundamental laws Nature
exist and operate
independently of our own
existence, much less of how
we, humans, see or perceive
its reality from our
various mental
frames of reference that we
can create independent from
the physical reality
of Nature!

[Indeed,
the Advanced
Mathematics has no
concern whatsoever
over the
physical
reality of
Nature as its
theories are build
upon foundations
that may have
nothing, but
absolutely
nothing, in common
with the
physical
reality of
Nature!]

.Furthermore,
a
kinetic
foundation cannot possibly
be transposed to represent
a formula for calculating
the inherent
internal substance
energy of matter, i.e., for
calculating its
ergoenergy
(erE).
Indeed, the
substance
energy
of a material block need
not be a function of its
state of motion or rest nor
of whether it is being
referenced to a particular
mental frame of reference
compared to
another!

..In
TRUTON, the
mass-energy
equivalency
is divided (or dissected, if you will)
into two distinct components:

an external one, where
mass (or better, inertial
mass) is being associated
with its external motion in
space leading to the
equivalency of
(inertial)
mass
with its
kinetic
energy;
and
an internal one,
leading to the (noted below)
matter-ergoenergy
equivalency,
where mass is associated with
its quantity of matter, as a
substance, leading to the
equivalency of matter with its
internal energy. That
equivalency springs from the
recognition that the fabric of
matter (as oppose to
prematter)
is ingrained, from its birth,
with
ergoenergy
(erE).

Einstein's
attributed energy
formula
E=mc2
purported to show the
equivalence of energy
with mass
is, as noted above,
an exercise into the
Absurd.
How the speed of
light
c
could possible have
anything to do with
the energy
E
of an arbitrary mass
m
is anybody's guess.
Do we have any
takers? .
BTW,
By that lunatic
energy formula,
particles (such as
photons) whose mass
is assumed to be
zero, will have
arguably zero energy
[sic!].
How more absurd it
can get?

On the Origin of Matter in Embryna
(Embryonal Nature)

As
already recognized, the Collision carries with
it an underneath non-observable agent --the
hitoforce (hF). Through that agent, as we have
seen, how the ergoenergy
(erE)
was
able to be created in the fabric of both the
material world (creating the
xenofluid)
and in the non-material field world (creating
the xenovoid).
Thus, both the xenofluid (XF) and xenovoid (XV)
are endowed with energy. The recognition that
energy can be a substance (xenofluid) and
also a field (xenovoid) is remarkable
indeed. With that recognition at hand, we can
now introduce the concept of embryonal matter
(eM).

The
concept of prematter(pM)
introduced in the previous page and
mentioned above in our first paragraph was
defined as being the admixture of the xenobase
(XB) and the void (VO) and, we wrote that
symbolically as: pM={XB, VO}.
Prena(pN)
now could be defined as the entity whose sole
ingredient is the prematter.

Now,
we define the embryonal matter
(eM)
as being the admixture of xenofluid (XF) and
ergovoid/xenovoid
(erV/XV) and write this symbolically as:
eM={XF, erV/XV}.
The fundamental characteristic of
eM
is
that it is endowed
withenergy
--the ergoenergy (erE). Now, with the
introduction of
eM,
we define the embryonal Nature
(eN)
as the entity evolved from Prena whose
ingredient is the embryonal matter
(eM
)
and nothing else. Prena
now can be viewed as being the primeval
Nature entity. While Nothingness --an
entity devoid of everything but its own
existence is part of Prena, it is no longer part
of the embryonal
Nature
and thus of Nature itself.

We
stress again of the dramatic difference between
the prematter
(pM)
and embryonal matter
(eM)
which is that the embryonal matter, as oppose to
the prematter, is endowed with energy. That
fundamental recognition make us see that

.Matter
is the prematter infused with
activivicergoenergy
--the
ergoviv (erV).
Thus,
the fundamental distinction is that
matter is endowed with
activivic
ergoenergy while the prematter is not.
And
that differentiation, of course, is
being transmitted between the concepts
of mass
and premass:
mass
is endowed with active
energy while the premass (embodied into
xenobase) is
not..The
xenobase is called the
frozen
matterof
the
low-end variety
(LEV)
as opposed to the xenorigid that is of
the high-end
variety (HEV)..Thus,
the fundamental characteristic of the
frozen
matter (FROMA)
is that, unlike
matter,
is devoid of activivergoenergy.
Frozen
matter (FROMA),
as oppose to the regular matter, is
said to be endowed with the locked-in
frozen
energy (FROEN)..Because
the constituents of the
frozen
matter (FROMA)
are the
xenobase
(XB)
and the
xenorigid
(XR),
we say that the
frozen
matter
comes in two grades or varieties: a
low-end
variety (LEV)
corresponding
to the
xenobase
and, a
high-end
variety (HEV)
corresponding to the
xenorigid.

!MUST
NOT
OVERPASS

.

The fact that the embryonal
matter
(eM)
is infused with ergoenergy (erE) whose
incarnation is the ergofield (erF) whose
tendency is to decompress to its
ergobase
(erB)
state, it follows --by the 7th UTPOT--
that the behaviour of the embryonal matter
(eM),
and thus of the matter itself, is dictated by
the stated tendency of the ergofield (erF). And
that recognition is most remarkable indeed as
now we can talk about
matter's
objective of
existence
which is to strive to reside at its
baselevel
(BALE)statewhich is the one of the
xenobase (XB) existence. That we can talk in a
meaningful way about an objective for the
matter's existence --that, in itself, is most
remarkable indeed. That, in addition, we can
also see what that objective is --that is even
more startling indeed. We mark that rather
astonishing recognition into

Compressed
xenosubstance (cXS) and thus matter has
one singular, ultimate objective for
its existence --that of staying and
residing at the xenobase (XB) state of
existence --the
baselevel
(BALE) state
called
also the
ergobase
(erB) state
of existence. We call
baseolution
that ultimate objective of matter whose
physical process to achieve that end is
called
baseleveling,
to be expressed through the
all-encompassing law
--the
Ultimate Baselevel Law Of Nature
(UBLON).

Remarks:.1.We note that at the substratum of
8th UTPOT
lies in the combination of the
2nd
and 3rd FURON..2.We further note that the
ergobase
(erB)
line that matter strive to exist is the
line of the bottom of the
ergosea
(erS)..3.
Xenofluid's
baseolution,
in its simplest form of expression, is
vested in its stated
renormalization
(RENO)
tendency to decompress in
accordance to the FODEP
principle that is being satisfied
through the existence of the
ergoforce
(erF).

Remark:
Because
of RENO,
the xenofluid (XF) will
acquire a resistance to
compression (RECO) that is
consistent with a
resistance
to change
(RETOC),
limited in strength, as
formulated in the posted
resistance
limit mark of creation
(RL-UMOC).

Evolution,
is
nothing but the continuous
struggle against the
baseolution.
Thus, evolution can only occur
when and where baseolution is
being able to be defeated. The
farther away the evolution is
from the baselevel line, the
higher the evolution is said
to be. Evolution, at all time,
must be able to keep in check
and overcome
baseolution.

The recognition that the activivic
energy (AE)
is the backbone
of Nature
is now being recognized and expressed
in an addendum, as the
ergo
facet
of the 4th FURON,

The
Foundational Complementary Facet of the
4th
FURON:Activivic
Energy as The Ultimate Denominator and
Bridge of Comunication of
Nature

Activivic
energy,
by being the integral part of both
mattter
and motion
without which they could not exist
independently, represents the
ultimate
substratum and common denominator
(CODE) through which the
ultimate
bridge of communication (BOC) between
them is being established, making it,
therefore, as the
ultimate
communicator of Nature
(UCON).

in, as thePrinciple
of Matter-Ergoenergy
Equivalency:

Both
the embryonal
matter
and ergoenergy
are deriving their existence from the
same primal agent --the Collision, the
primeval agent of creation (PAC). As
such, they are said to be equivalent in
rapport to their origin of existence.
In a formal way, we say that
matter
and ergoenergy are equivalent
modulo their
existence.

If
we define mass as the
quantity
of
matter
in a body and nothing else, then the
resultant mass-ergoenergy
equivalence
can be stated that the mass of an
object is a measure of its ergoenergy
content.

and finally
in, as

The
FifthFoundational
Universal Recognition Of
Nature
(5thFURON): Ergoenergy
as The Ultimate Regulator of
Matter

Ergoenergy,
by being an integral part of matter and
thus, by subscribing to
UBLON,
it will channel its ergoflow to create
a common ergolevel platform between the
high and low ergolevels of ego-objects
that are in contact. We call this
the
ergoleveling
process
of the ergoenergy.

Remarks
and Definitions:1.The simplest example of the
ergoleveling process is the temperature
flow and transfer between "hot" and
"cold" objects in contact or confined
into a closed system. More subtle
examples of the ergoleveling process
will be revealed when the
proton-electron and proton-proton
interactions are to be studied in a not
too distant page.2.The ergoleveling
process
implies the existence of an
ergoenergy
(erE)
flow called ergoflow (erFLO). We
call ergodynamics
(ergoD)
the study of the ergoflow dynamics
(erFLOD).

Finally,
it is important to recognize now of the TRUTON's
foundational pointer that is to be used in its
maiden journey that we have just began. It is
vested in the introduced
"objective
of
existence"
concept
for matter. Looking through that concept is as
if looking through a most powerful "lens"
through which we can "see" Nature's foundational
blueprint. That foundational blueprint of Nature
is indeed most helpful in guiding us to the
discoveries of the most underneath laws that
governs Nature.

On
the Concept Of
Nature

We
define Nature as being the
entity containing everything but
Nothingness --an entity devoid of
everything but its own
existence.

From
the multitude
existence mark of creation
(ME-UMOC),
and the subsequent Remark
4
above, we have recognized that the
embryonal Nature
(eN)
needs not be limited to exist as one
single block, but as a multitude of
blocks, called parcels,
that are separated by the void (VO)
space (i.e., separated by the
Nothingness medium). The fragmented
existence of Nature through its
parcels
(PARONs)
offers its most general
representation.

Nature
is not confined to exist as
one single block, but rather
its existence is fragmented in
a multitude of parcels
separated by Nothingness --an
entity devoid of everything
but its own existence. All
those parcels are made up of
the same identical primary
ingredients: the
xenosubstance (XS) and
the
xenovoid (XV).

Remarks:Aside from the fact
that Nature is not a continuum
block, but is made of parcels
(PARONs)
separated by the absolute void
medium of Prena, each
PARON
in turn need not be a continuum
block as it can contain in it a
number of "holes of Nothingness
(HONs)."

In
addition, we note that the xenovoid
(XV) medium of Nature, in itself, is
not a continuum medium as it contain
"oases" of void (VO). And that is
because, as already noted
above,
finite "patches" or "clouds" of XV
are being formed that reside in the
limitless void (VO) medium of
Prena.

From
the permanent
existential mark of creation
(PE-UMOC),
as noted above,
the permanency of Nature is firmly
secured on the grounds that there is
no transformation or process that
can transform a material entity into
Nothingness --an entity devoid of
everything but its own
existence.

From
the
substantive
foundational mark of creation
(SF-UMOC)
and the PE-UMOC,the
preservation of the xenosubstance
(XS) integrity is firmly
established. And that is because
there is no physical transformation
in Nature or anywhere else that can
convert Nothingness into
Xenosbstance (XS) and vice
versa. However, the Nothingness
can be transformed into Xenovoid
(XV) and as such, in that sense
only, we can talk about the limited
expansion capability of
PARONs.

The
permanent conserved existence
of Nature is guaranteed by the
permanent conserved existence
of its xenosubstance that
cannot be increased nor
decreased as there is no
transformation capable of
making it or destroy it. The
xenosubstance can only be
transformed from one state
into another, but it can never
be created nor annihilated
through any
process.

Remark:
The xenobase (XB) --the default
state of existence of the
xenosubstance (XS) is a primeval
given
entity and therefore, questioning
its origin in TRUTON is
meaningless.

On
the Emerging Cosmological Picture of
Embryna (Embryonal
Nature)

From
the above presentation, we begin to "see" how
the embryonal Nature
(eN)
is shaping up: not like a single block but
rather as an aggregate of parcels of matter
surrounded by the void space (VOS) representing
the space of Nothingness. We can talk
about a buffer of Nothingness (BON) of
two adjacent parcels of Nature
(APRONs).

Within
each such parcel of Nature (PARON),
we have blocks of xenobase (XB) masses moving
and colliding randomly in their surrounding
space that is a mixture of xenovoid (XV) and
void (VO). Because of the collision activity of
two such APRONs,
their common BON
will shrink and, in some cases, able to break
through and establish xenovoid (XV) bridges
of communication (BOCs) that, in effect,
will unite them forming a new composed
parcel
of Nature (PARON).
Thus, holes
of Nothingness (HONs)
can be part of the anatomy of a PARON.

The
study of impact
of collisions,
as we have seen, was able to usher us in
discovering the ingredients of matter --the
compressed xenobase (cXB) and the xenovoid
(XV)-- and thus, of the emergence of the
embryonal Nature
(eN)
out of Prena. That study, to be continued, will
be able to open new vistas with respect to
another type ofbridges
of communication
(BOCs)
that are found to exist in
eN
--the "ergo" BOCs. Those BOCs are
with respect to the
"ergo
relationships"
that the material objects can establish with
their existing environment
--relationships that can be transmitted
only through the "ergo" BOCs. The study of those
relationships
will be able to reveal not only the objects'
behavioral and interactional properties, but
also the rationale for their existence --the big
WHY. That path of relationships is the path
through which the embryonal Nature
(eN)
has been evolving from its inception and, as
such, that is the path that we have to trace and
follow.