Saturday, July 31, 2010

The most long-lasting, virulent, and dangerous active measure is covert influence. In a covert influence operation a payload is secretly inserted into some part of the enemy’s communications channels. The ultimate goal of covert influence is to transform the enemy in a way that is useful to the attacker.

In a typical covert influence operation an intelligence officer targets an agent of influence. The target is chosen for access to a desired channel of communications (the ComIntern intel operators targeted American media, academia, and Hollywood). The intelligence officer uses standard recruiting tradecraft to become friends with the targeted agent of influence. Appealing to the identified vulnerabilities of the targeted agent, the officer burrows into the target’s life.

The targeted agent of influence may, or may not, know that she is dealing with a hostile intelligence service, even after she is recruited. The agent might provide her services because she believes in the message, or she may work for pay, or maybe for some other gratification. In the actual operation, the espionage officer provides the recruited agent of influence with the payload. The agent of influence inserts the payload into his communications channel. Once the payload is inserted, in the form of a news story, an editorial, a speech, a book, a lecture, a movie, a radio program, a song, a play, or any other form of communication, the payload takes on a life of its own.

The message can influence consumers for the rest of their lives. All it takes is one time exposure, and consumers’ beliefs and attitudes can be changed. Reading a book or an article, hearing a song or a radio show, seeing a movie or a play are potentially life-changing experiences. The communist covert influence message was intended to change individual and societal morals and values.

This Covert Influencing is what's messed up the minds of "progressives" and others who're too lazy to think for themselves. Covert Influence is about corruption, immorality, anything-goes, don't worry, be happy cavalier uncaringness about ...things. Not to mention socialism/communism, which we see happening right now, with Obama and the Democrats, and with other national governments and societies. Oh, yes. I've been, for years now, researching what's been going on in the Free World that's so weird and bizarrely transformative vis-a-vis what once was, like in the Fifties, certainly prior to the 1917 Bolshevist Revolution that changed the world.

Millions and millions have been influenced by the corrupting messages coming from the international socialist-communist movement. They're everywhere now, across the entire state apparati of the world. In government, in the public service, the newsmedia, the schools and universities, in Hollywood, etc., etc.

Those millions and millions of others, on the other hand, who think for themselves as opposed to simply accepting things as imposed, no matter what, have, in the past so many years, come to understand what's happened and are now uprising and pushing back against the "progressive" movement (what the communists call themselves today, euphemistically).

The Tea Party is an example. FOX News is another. World Net Daily yet another. Andrew Breitbart is a leading activist in the uprising and pushback, basically the chief reverse-Alinsky.

Those who are "progressive" or otherwise clueless and brainwashed by the covert-influence-borne messages they receive from the Old Media, schools and peers, they don't realize that they're being used, are carriers of the virus of corruption sent by an enemy regime to transform the Free World in the interests of the enemy regime.

It's not just Russia that practices Covert Influencing. Communist China does it, too, and CSIS head Richard Fadden alluded to it.

Friday, July 30, 2010

In other words, around the end of the 1980s, science (at least science reporting) took on a distinctly authoritarian tone. Whether because of funding availability or a desire by some senior academics for greater relevance, or just the spread of activism through the university, scientists stopped speaking objectively and started telling people what to do. And people don’t take well to that, particularly when they’re unable to evaluate the information that supposedly requires them to give up their SUV, their celebratory cigar, or their chicken nuggets.

The public’s trust is further undermined by scientific scandals, such as the recent ClimateGate affair, when it became apparent that climate scientists, if not overtly cooking their books, were behaving as partisans out to create a unified perception of the climate in order to advance a policy agenda. The climate community is probably the biggest user of the authoritarian voice, with frequent pronouncements that “the science says we must limit atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations to 350 parts per million,” or some dire outcome will eventuate. Friends of the Earth writes, “For example, science tells us we must reduce our global greenhouse gas emissions to prevent dangerous climate change.” America’s climate change negotiator in Copenhagen is quoted by World Wildlife Fund as saying, “China must do significantly more if we are to have a chance to solve the problem and to arrive at an international agreement that achieves what science tells us we must.” Science as dictator—not a pretty sight.

If science wants to redeem itself and regain its place with the public’s affection, scientists need to come out every time some politician says, “The science says we must…” and reply, “Science only tells us what is. It does not, and can never tell us what we should or must do.” If they say that often enough, and loudly enough, they might be able to reclaim the mantle of objectivity that they’ve given up over the last 40 years by letting themselves become the regulatory state’s ultimate appeal to authority. Hey, you know, perhaps Biba has something there—maybe science does need better PR!

Thursday, July 29, 2010

You know, if this guy was a Conservative leader, the Liberals would have their community-organizer comrades rustle up some hard-left terrorists to "protest" the Conservative, calling him/her all the usual cliche slurs we hear coming from the hard left, the Liberals and Old Media.

Iggy's getting a FREE RIDE!

We ought to have some Astroturf, rent-an-idiot "protestors" to smear the Iggiot as a "racist, sexist, anti-gay, Islamophobe... Liberal guy go away!" or something like that, and make sure the CBC, CTV, TorStar, etc... cover it real good... Tit for tat... But, nah, the Canadian People have largely become too immune to that nonsense by now, and those dumb enough to fall for it wouldn't ever vote Conservative anyway...

Which one looks more genuine, authentic, more natural? Who's real and who's fake?

This Michael Ignatieff guy's been riding around the country in a big fancy bus for a while now, dressed in jeans and ugly shirts and ballcaps and such. Hell, we've even seen his gitchy waistband, with ugly shirt tucked thereunto, whilst the Iggiot bent over and browsed for cheese.

WTF? What's he trying to pull? Does he REALLY expect us to believe that, all of a sudden, he's a different man, not some kind of Count or Czar or Ivory-tower egghead, but rather just some regular slob at Timmy's?

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

A bill introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., would reinstate a compulsory military draft during war time and require U.S. citizens not selected for military duty to perform a "national service obligation" – as defined by President Obama – for a minimum of two years.

Rangel introduced the Universal National Service Act, or H.R. 5741 on July 15. The measure was referred to the House Armed Services' Subcommittee on Military Personnel on July 23.

Toldya so! Voila the hidden agenda.

What does one expect from the super-corrupt, unethical, race-baiting Charlie Rangel?

We'll see. But it's doubtful it'll happen in 2010, given the Midterms.

If Obama were re-elected, he'd definitely try to do this. It's part of his extreme ideology.There's no shortage of crazy-ass, extreme, revolutionary Democrats, apparently. They're like a can of mixed nuts and dried fruits.

I’ve got this great idea: Let’s open a shooting range next to the L’Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal.

What, too soon after the Montreal Massacre?

Well how about a museum, overlooking Pearl Harbor, dedicated to the military accomplishments of Japanese Emperor Hirohito?

Too tasteless?

OK. How about a 13-story, $100-million mosque at Ground Zero in New York City, on the rubble of a building that was damaged on 9/11? And let’s have it run by a Muslim radical who believes America had it coming. And let’s give the mosque a jihadist name: Cordoba House, named after the capital of the Muslim conquest of Spain centuries ago. And let’s make it a headquarters for Dawah, the Arabic word for promoting sharia law.

I got a great idea! Let's build an Orthodox Catholic Church across the street from a gay bar that was firebombed! As if the Left would ever tolerate the very proposal!

Let's build an all-male-only clubhouse/lounge across the street from a battered womens' shelter!

Let's build a pro-life activism center across the street from an abortion factory!

Let's build a Crusades museum across the street from a mosque!

Let's build a cowboy/European-settler museum across the road from an Indian reservation!

Let's build non-Native houses on land claimed by Indians! They wouldn't, and don't, tolerate that, and would, and DO, criminally terrorize the new non-Native residents! (Re. Caledonia)

Shame on the ideologically-extreme, morally-disingenuous, far-leftwing propagandists for standing up for the Islamic supremacists who want to build the mega-mosque. And, yes, it's a mega-mosque, 'cause that's what we're calling it, so get used to it, 'cause The People won't ever get used to the idea of whatever kind of Islamic-oriented construction on sacred Ground Zero ground. It'd be something like building a neo-Nazi clubhouse across the road from Auschwitz, and that wouldn't be tolerated either.

On the one hand, we have the ACLU getting crosses, the Ten Commandments, Bibles, etc. banned, prayer in school banned, Christians arrested for standing across the street from abortion factories and gay assemblies... but it's ok to build a massive Islamic edifice on the sacred burial ground of the victims of Islamic supremacists?

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Every day it seems that there’s a new group of people lining up to bemoan the Industry Minister’s announcement that the census would forego the mandatory long-form. Certainly, this illustrates a serious problem that Stephen Harper faces as Prime Minister. Facing an opposition that can’t get its act together is one thing, but a nation where the voices of special interests are louder than ordinary citizens is another.

The divisions, though well-covered-up, are deep and seething and threaten to go nuclear at any time without warning.

Make no mistake- the Clintons are infamously unscrupulous wily schemers and will stop at nothing to get what they want. Just watch them.

Mark my words: They will screw Obama.

If I were to make a partisan smear attack like Democrats do, I'd suggest that they're mad at Obama's nomination and resultant presidency for reasons of race. Who knows? After all, there's no question, given the history and the current evidence, that the Democratic Party is seething with racially based animosity, notwithstanding the "inclusive" act they put on for political optics.

Besides, as there's little difference between Hillary's and Obama's neo-communist, dhimmi, anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, anti-Israel policies and agenda, so what else is there to explain the animosity?

If it's ok for this poophead to go around claiming, without evidence, other than HEARSAY, offered (a la the Obamacrats and their brownshirt minions down south), that the Calgary Police Force is full of "racists", then it's ok to say that the LIBERAL PARTY has racists within it and is in need of an overhaul. So there!

Typical Prog. Going around alleging groups of "having racists within". Without offering evidence. This is the latest smear tactic of Progs. The Obamacrats hypocritically do it with the Tea Party. Now the Liberals are doing it, too.

Let's do it right back at them. It's ...war, after all, and if we don't fight back, they'll win by cheating. They leave us no choice.

Besides, it's not as if there's no evidence of bigotry and intolerance within the Liberal Party. It's just not being reported by the Old Media, who looks the other way, condoning the hate permeating the Liberal Party, just as they ignore/excuse the hate so apparently threading throughout the Democratic Party, historically and contemporarily the party of intolerance.

the most destructive force on the planet is power-driven financiers and profit-driven corporations and their cartels backed by military might; and that the global warming myth is a red herring that contributes to hiding this truth.

Well, I do agree with him that the global warming myth is about hiding the truth. As for the other stuff, nah, I think it's more of a big scam by folks like Al Gore, George Soros and Maurice Strong, who want to make billions of dollars by lying to and scaring the hell (and the money) out of the world.

The rats are abandoning the sinking USS Sex-Crazed Poodle.

Poor Sex-Crazed Poodle. Having a meltdown every day now as Karma's come around and is biting his ass...

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Judges on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals suddenly have abandoned plans to assess damages against an attorney whose clients are challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president after he argued that if there was to be punishment, he would have the right to know whether the defendants could have mitigated their injury by publicly releasing Obama's birth documentation.

Quite telling, ain't it?

The judges backed off because they don't want to inconvenience/anger Obama and the Men Behind the Curtain of Mystery.

It's a game, what's going on here. It's not the law, nor the Constitution that's motivating the judges; it's The Game.

Why do Islamic supremacists want to build a thirteen-story mosque costing $100 million... on the sacred burial ground of thousands massacred by Muslims in cold blood in the name of Allah? And why do they want to call it "Cordoba House"? Newt Gingrich discusses...

The proposed "Cordoba House" overlooking the World Trade Center site – where a group of jihadists killed over 3000 Americans and destroyed one of our most famous landmarks - is a test of the timidity, passivity and historic ignorance of American elites. For example, most of them don’t understand that “Cordoba House” is a deliberately insulting term. It refers to Cordoba, Spain – the capital of Muslim conquerors who symbolized their victory over the Christian Spaniards by transforming a church there into the world’s third-largest mosque complex.

Today, some of the Mosque’s backers insist this term is being used to "symbolize interfaith cooperation" when, in fact, every Islamist in the world recognizes Cordoba as a symbol of Islamic conquest. It is a sign of their contempt for Americans and their confidence in our historic ignorance that they would deliberately insult us this way.

Those Islamists and their apologists who argue for "religious toleration" are arrogantly dishonest. They ignore the fact that more than 100 mosques already exist in New York City. Meanwhile, there are no churches or synagogues in all of Saudi Arabia. In fact no Christian or Jew can even enter Mecca.

And they lecture us about tolerance.

The mega-mosque at Cordoba, Spain, built by the Muslims who invaded, without provocation and without any reason other than the spread of Islam, and occupied the city by force.Those who want to build one at Ground Zero plan to call it "Cordoba House", an extreme provocation, no doubt.

If this monument of hate goes up, I recommend that everyone buy a pair of these, wear them for a good amount of time, step in some doggie doo and piggie poo and then walk brazenly into the lobby, wearing a Motoon... T-shirt...

To those who deny it's a mosque, come on... what are you, cranks? Everyone says it's a mosque, so you better believe it or be considered a loon. Besides, we're supposed to believe Obama's constitutional eligibility to be President isn't in question 'cause "everyone" says it isn't, so why the double standard? Get with the program, dhimmi dummy! It's a mega-mosque and it's wrong to put it at Ground Zero! Period!

No wonder so many people have been brainwashed into wrongly thinking Sarah Palin is "stupid" and even much worse. They depend on the likes of such liars as recently exposed via their echo-chamber email listserv "JournoList", now defunct. It's just the tip of the iceberg.

Expect more newsmedia liars and propagandists to be exposed in the future. Shame on them for telling lies to people and manipulating them into being lazy-mindedly prejudiced against Sarah Palin and other non-leftists. They know the average person catching the headlines, soundbytes and opinion masquerading as "news", that they haven't developed much in the way of a sophisticated ability to think for themselves, so they take advantage to manipulate their perceptions. The chief beneficiaries? Obama and the Democrats.

Mark my words: It's much the same in all countries, including Canada. It's obvious. We don't need a smoking gun, for we can tell by the pattern of the Old Media's prejudices, lies and coverups.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Muralitharan wed 24-year-old business graduate Madhi Ramamurthy at a five-hour ceremony attended by 2,000 guests in the southern Indian city of Chennai.

"This is the happiest day of my life," the 32-year-old told Reuters at the ceremony witnessed by team mates Sanath Jayasuriya, Chaminda Vaas and World Cup-winning captain and close friend Arjuna Ranatunga.

Muralitharan's mother Lakshmi had been fretting for years that her son was focusing too much on cricket at the expense of his personal life.

In the end it was a shoulder injury that gave the celebrated wicket-taker the necessary push to tie the knot.

So how does it feel to be top of the world.I must say the king of the cricket in every respect. What do you think any one can reach near to the 800th wicket mark in test cricket. sri lankan team have their names in golden words.

Expect the Old Media to bury this story, like they buried the Obama/Rev. Wright racist-pastor story.

Don't expect the Liberals, NDP, Bloc, the community organizers and the "anti-racism" crowd to say much, if anything... and don't expect any street demos, either. They won't care. Mark my words.

Yup, looks like everyone except CNews (of the SUN news outlet that's bringing us SUN News TV) has buried the story. CTV interviewed Sara but they don't seem to have put her on the news after all, plus CBC bumped her for Helena Guergis.

Looks like we now know who of the media is doing their job: The SUN News people!

"In my last post on Van, I called him an American patriot," wrote Patel. "That is high praise in my book. But watching Van's speech at the NAACP, I have another title for him, one that I reserve for the true giants of history. Van Jones is a faith hero."

This guy is also connected to the Ground Zero Big Islamist Center construction push...

Hopefully, Obama's massive revolutionary agenda to transform America into something we won't recognize will fail by the time he'll be out in 2012.

Hopefully, he'll be impeached before then, sometime in 2011. He's just too dangerously extreme and revolutionary. He's very bad for America and for the world and for world civilization.

Leave it to "progressives" to spin it as "ideology" over "common sense".

They can call it what they want. But to call freedom, particularly freedom to choose, a mere "ideology", as if it was a bad thing, and fascism "common sense", well, that illustrates, in a nutshell, the problem with the "progressive" "liberal" left.

Besides, it's unfair that Obama isn't required by the Left to prove his Constitutional eligibility to be President (by showing us his REAL birth certificate), whereas the Left wants ordinary people to show theirs to prove their eligibility for lesser stuff... and to be forced, via threat of prosecution, to fill out a privacy-invading form.

Those who are soooooo gung-ho over making people answer private questions are actually liberal fascist ideologues.

Taken out by evidence provided by Andrew Breitbart via Big Government website.

See? I told you that Andrew Breitbart was gonna be BIG.

He's proving it. He's taking down the Obamacracy, bit by bit, by exposing them with hard evidence.

He's doing the job the Old Media was supposed to do.

It's sooooo easy that the massive "news" industry's inability/unwillingness to do it is astonishing, to say the least, and raises serious questions in the minds of those who continue to quit paying attention to those Obamacracy propagandists.

Well, Mr. Nazi Collaborator Soros, what do you think of the hate speech of Samir Shabazz and the rest of the neo-Nazi New Black Panthers who are advocating for genocide? These folks are the ones you need to go af...ter. Why are you going after dissidents on the radio who simply criticize Washington's policies? I thought Obama said dissent was "patriotic", not "hate speech"?

Hmm. Methinks that George "Proud, Unrepentant Nazi-Holocaust Collaborator" Soros, Obama's chief puppetmaster and financial backer, is the one really running America, and Obama's just a frontman.

In a nutshell, George Soros sees the Free Press as an inconvenience to be silenced, with phony, bullshitty "hate speech" accusations as "justification". In his book, if you're against his Reich, you're engaged in "hate speech"!

In a nutshell, "progressives" like George Soros who don't like what someone says... they'll make 'em shut up by simply deeming what they say to be "hate speech"... Hey! Ok, then, tit for tat... I accuse "progressives" of hate speech! Now they better shut up!

Meh. Like, who, but a few attention-hogging windbaggy-talking-heads really care?

Most people, I betcha, are probably pleased that they don't have to fill out that big, fecking piece of unnecessary Big-Brother nosiness and can just say, yup, I live in Canada; count me.

After all, the purpose of a census is to count how many people live in the country, eh... It's been hijacked by hard-left-wing, revolutionary social reengineers for all sorts of purposes and is intrusive.

After all, what business does the government have in our bedrooms, and in whatever other room of the house?

The piece is full of spin, speculation, opinion, etc. Should've been put on the "Opinion" page.

Friday, July 16, 2010

After quitting the Michael "Whiffy" Ignatieff Liberal Party's War Room out of frustration, Warren "Prince of Darkness" Kinsella is AGAIN playing the thorn in the Liberal Party's side. This time he's actually supporting the Harper Conservatives' decision to make the long-form Census voluntary, going against Whiffy's dictated position for the Party.

I note also that the Pauper of Poopy Dimness from Heck is also a proponent of a Liberal-NDP coalition (which, in practicality, would require separatist/communist Bloc Quebecois support). Uh-oh... the Liberal leadership has once again brought the wrath and heckfires of Blazing Catmeat upon themselves... Cool! Beer and popcorn time!

Thursday, July 15, 2010

That's what Obama and his racist, neo-communist criminal regime are doing!

Whitewashing Black RacismIt's very much worthy of widespread discussion that Obama isn't saying anything about these racists, whom he and his regime are doing everything they can, including illegally and unconstitutionally, to shield from justice for racism-motivated crimes.

The murder-inciting racists at the center of the felony, racism-motivated voter-intimidation case.

Obama is using his increasingly-totalitarian power to protect these guys from the law.

And the wilful ignorance of this critically serious, dangerous, growing issue, on the part of the Old Media, is cause for grave concern as well.

It's yet more evidence that Glenn Beck was right- that Obama is racist. And that so is the Old Media.

More and more every day, the Obama-Democrat regime and its propaganda wing, the Old Media, look very much like a totalitarian, racist criminal organization who, refusing to do its job, and refusing to uphold the Constitution, protects its extremist, hard-left-wing, Marxist, racist cronies from having to face justice for racially-motivated felonies.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Future douchebaggers be forewarned: YOU may be NEXT to have your ugly mug posted all over the place for everyone to see, and they'll know you're a douchebagger! PLUS the cops will be looking for you, neo-commie punk!

President Obama is betraying the Jews. He is a cultural Muslim whose sympathies lie with the Islamic world in its life-death struggle against Israel. Unless American Jews wake up and speak out against Mr. Obama's pro-Arab, anti-Israel policies, the Jewish state faces a possible nuclear war - and even annihilation.

“We are seeing more and more Canadians being radicalized and deciding to support the (Islamist) cause through violence,” said Gilles Michaud, the RCMP Assistant Commissioner in charge of the force's national security criminal investigations. “It is a growing trend that we are very concerned about.” Up until recently, officials believed terror threats would come exclusively from outside Canada and efforts were made to beef up the borders, Michaud said.

“Now, what we are seeing is that threat is growing from inside and is going elsewhere,” he said. “It’s like we are exporters of terrorism to a certain extent.” Michaud’s comments come as the Al-Qaida-linked and Somali-based Al-Shabaab group claimed responsibility for co-ordinated bomb attacks in the Ugandan capital of Kampala that killed 76 people Sunday.

Obviously the Left is wrong to assume that there's nothing to worry about, no need to take serious measures to stamp out this violent ideology. Clearly, the Left is in denial because reality is inconvenient to their agenda. The Left gets crazy and literally pretends that all's well and that the only threat is from the Mainstream, who isn't Leftist.

Of course, if we suffer a terrorist attack, the Left will blame us, not the terrorists, nor their ideology, etc. Leftists always assume that good people assume that the good victims are bad and that the bad attackers are innocent because somehow they were hurt by the good victims' "policies". Of course, what's what is that the Left is onside with the terrorists because the Left is trying to get rid of the "policies" which it doesn't like. So the Left is in cahoots with the terrorists, but we can see this, as Leftists are always eager to stand up for the terrorists instead of the victims... or potential victims. It's all selective. And most Leftists don't realize that they're wrong, because they delude themselves and each other into believing, wrongly, of course, that they "mean well". How stupid!

What we need is stronger anti-terror and anti-Islamization policies and programs, not weaker ones, as the Left, inspired by their terrorist comrades, demands.

Remember that pro-terrorist billboard that once went up in Canada a while back?

Stuff like this isn't helping!

Neither is the following, that dude with the illegal Hezbollah flag at a Leftist "demonstration" in Toronto, where some Leftist federal Opposition MPs were spotted

Hey, bearded asshole! What the feck's so funny? You think killing people in cold blood is funny? Wipe that stupid-ass Leftist-Islamic-Supremacist grin off your fuzzy mug, eh!

Of course, the Left will get mad that anyone dares to bring this stuff up and will accuse any whistleblowers of "hatemongering and inciting Islamophobia", which couldn't be further from the truth, though they could, if they wanted, use words like "awarenessmongering" and "Islamosupremacismophobia" and "Islamizationophobia" and "terroristattackophobia".

Besides, Leftists are Christianophobic, Judeophobic, Ameriphobic, Israelophobic, even Candadophobic. Hell, Leftists are freedomophobic, democratophobic, ruleoflawophobic, equalityophobic... the list goes on and on... Show it to Ron Jeremy, he'll be impressed as hell at its size...

Again, Mr. Travesty attempts, in vain as usual, to fearmonger and spin everything into negatives or hypothetical negatives based on his wild-n-crazy, wacky-lefty imagination. It's not even mildly amusing, and reeks of the same-old, same-old anti-right negative-nellying to which we're tiresomely accustomed as coming from Old Liberal Media babbling heads such as Jimmy here.

And there's another glaring problem with this TurdStar article: It's actually filed under "news", when, in fact, it's nothing but opinion, and a rather stinkily biased opinion at that.

See why I can't stand the Old Liberal Media? Manipulative, deceptive, disingenuous, propagandic, methano-sulfur-bloviating bumholes is what they are!

Ezra also questions about the Old Media's selective, manipulative coverage, about the Legal Hard Left's curious, inconvenient-question-raising, selective "caring" about various imprisoned folks worldwide and asks why it wasn't treated by the Old Media and the Legal Left as a big deal until after the Liberals were dethroned by the Conservatives.

Food for thought. Lazy-minded Prog Lefties can, if they prefer instead of using their brains, just have another beer and take another toke of their "goodshit" crap and continue to believe whatever the Old Media and their Prog peers noise-off at them.