[ Eleanor White's (http://www.raven1.net/) comments: This
hard hitting article by Judy Wall, who is NOT a mind control victim and
in fact avoids victim testimonials in favour of only factual objective material,
contains some POWERFUL items not widely known among involuntary mind control
experimentees. These items in her article below have had the font size increased
a notch so that the visitor can scroll down and see just those items if
time or interest is short.]

USAF COMMANDO SOLO: AERIAL MIND CONTROL BROADCASTS

The United States Air Force uses aerial mind-control broadcasts
against civilian population as well as enemy troops. Some of these
actions against civilians are done with the intent of influencing public
opinion and the outcome of elections.

To the Desert Storm offensive we can now add several other
incidents. Alex Horvat, editor of The Probe, calls to our attention the
1998 video, Exotic Weapons of Mass Control, produced
by Bob Fletcher.

"The excerpt played on Fletcher's video is from TLC
(The Learning Channel) and clearly states that Commando Solo
was used in Haiti for what was called Operation Uphold Democracy. As
the general populace was violently opposed to Aristide and most in favor
of his ouster, it took nearly a year of this clandestine counter-programming
to get them to change their minds. Instead of butchering
a population physically, we can now manipulate them mentally, virtually
enslaving their thoughts with a criss-cross pattern of flights by an EC-130
(which is just a C-130 heavily laden with electron- ic hardware.) [3]

We were not at war with the citizens of Haiti, yet the U.S.
Government directed military weapons against this friendly, or at least
neutral, civilian population. The U.S. Government sanction the "rigging"
of the Haitian election by mental control of the people, programming them
to cast their votes for the Americans' favored candidate. And they had the
nerve to call it "Operation Uphold Democracy". Some sense of humor!
Stalin would have loved it. Hitler would have loved it. Why is the U.S.
Government doing this? Who is behind this flagrant violation of civil liberties?
Is it the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) which has a long history
of interfering in foreign government politics? Or has this become standard
military procedure?

The rationale is always the same: "to make the world
safe for democracy". Yet what is democracy if not freedom? Freedom
to think your own thoughts;freedom to express your own opinions; freedome
to vote for the candidate of your own choice.

Fletcher's video also mentions that the same technology was
used against the Bosnia population for a week to influence their election.
[4] This was probably done during Operation Joint Guard in 1995. [5]

The questions arise: If they have used mind-control broadcasts
against foreign civilian populations to influence elections, will they use
them against American citizens -- or have they already? What other countries
may be the recipients of this innovative technology?

Just what is this EC-130E Commando Solo? The United States
Air Force has helpfully published a fact sheet that describes the Lockheed
built aircraft. [6]

This 1995 bulletin states that the "unit
flyaway cost" is more than US $100 million each, and that there are
eight in the inventory. Its primary function is "Psychological
operations broadcasts". The crew consists of four officers
(pilot, copilot, navigator, control chief/EWO) and seven enlisted members
(flight engineer, loadmaster, five mission crew.)

According to the fact sheet:

"Air Force Mission: Commando Solo conducts
psychological operations and civil affairs broadcast missions
in the standard AM, FM, HF, TV and military communications bands.
Missions are flown at maximum altitudes possible to ensure optimum propagation
patterns. The EC-130 flies during either day or night scenarios with equal
success, and is air refuealable. A typical mission consists of a single
ship orbit which is offset from the desired target audience. The
targets may be either military or civilian personnel.

"Air Force Features: Highly specialized modifications
have been made to the latest version of the EC-130. Included in these
modifications are enhanced navigation systems, self-protection equipment,
and the capability of broadcasting color television on a multitude of
world-wide standards throughout the TV VHF/UHF ranges.

"Air Force Background: Air National Guard EC-130 aircraft
flown by the 193rd Special Operations Group were deployed to both Saudi
Arabia and Turkey in support of Desert Storm. Their missions included
broadcasts of 'Voice of the Gulf' and other programs intended
to convince Iraqi soldiers to surrender

"The EC-130 was originally modified using the mission
electronic equipment from the EC-121, known at the time
as the Coronet Solo. Soon after the 193rd SOG received
its EC-130s, the unit participated in the rescue of US citizens in Operation
Urgent Fury, acting as an airborne radio station informing those
people on Granada of the US military action.

"Volant Solo, as the mission is now
known, was instrumental in the success of coordinated psychological operations
in Operation Just Cause, again broadcasting continuously
throughout the initial phases of the operation."

Operation Just Cause? this is another propaganda name, applied
to the U.S. invasion of Panama to take out that country's
leader, General Noreiga, the CIA's erstwhile partner in drug smuggling.
Apparently the General had made someone mad -- how else to account for the
massive invasion of this tiny tourist country? To wit: "A superpower
whipped the poop out of 10 percent of the police force of a Third World
nation. You are supposed to be able to do that. It was done well, and I
credit those who did it. But it is important that we draw the right lessons
from it" according to an anonymous US Marine. [7]

Our Commander-in-Chief had another point of view:

"...the roll call of glory, the roster of great American
campaigns -- Yorktown, Gettysburg, Normandy, and now Panama." --President
George Bush, March 1990 [8]

MILITARY PSYOPS AGAINST CIVILIANS

In a phone call to the USAF Special Operations Command Public
Affairs Office, I questioned the legitimacy of using these subliminal broadcasts
against civilian populations. [9]

I was told that it was all perfectly legal, having been approved
by the U.S. Congress (!). It may be okay by Congress, but I sincerely doubt
that it would be approved by the recipient populations.

That conversation also elicited more information concerning
the Commando Solo units. For instance, the Air National Guard of the individual
states in the U.S. can also operate Commando Solo aircraft, should the Governor
of a state request assistance. That means the PsyOps mind-control
technology can be directed against U.S. citizens.

The Commando Solo aircraft have participated in the following
missions-- possibly more, as the early missions of Volant Solo 1 were not
known to this spokesperson:

Other countries are known to have a similar aircraft, but
the PR officer declined to identify them, suggesting that I check out Jane's
Defence Weekly for such information. Not having access to that
particular publication, I searched through my copy of Jane's Radar and Electronic
Warfare Systems 1993094. [10] The Commando Solo unit was not listed, but
a browse through the book was informative as to the numerous types of electronic
offence and defence systems available. These include stationary and mobile
land units (many housed in large trucks), shipboard and airborne models
as well as well as space-based technology. If the military is spending US
$100 million per airborne unit (times eight, we're talking US $800 million
here), I think it is safe to assume that they have tried out mind control
equipment with less expensive, roving land units (trucks), but use the airplanes
to cover wider areas and hard-to-reach locations of the world.

And I might add, we can asume that they have tried out the
efficacy of this mind-control technology. Even the US military would not
waste $800 million on something unless it has been proven to work, and work
effectively, even under the adverse situation of military combat. This is
an important point.

The initial research into mind control in the USA was conducted
under the auspices of the CIA. The flagrant abuse of human rights in experimenting
on unsuspecting persons was based on the supposition that the veracity of
experiments would be compromised if a subject knew that he was participating
in an experiment. In the case of mind-control technology, this supposition
might very well be true. But that does not justify its use
-- or so said the Nuremburg Code, the tenets of which were
used as a legal basis to pro- secute Nazi scientists for war crimes. However
the US seems to have excused its own military and scientific community from
adhering to that Code. [11]

MANIPULATING MIND AND BODY BY SATELLITE

The next logical step in mind control would be to incorporate
this technology into satellite communications. Since other countries are
known to have similar capabilities, there could occur a sitution in which
electronic mind control warfare is waged against a civilian population,
receiving conflicting mental manipulation from both sides. What would be
the mental state of individuals so targetted? Would it cause a rise in mental
aberrations and schizophrenia? And what are the limits of mind manipulations?
Can people be forced to commit suicide? Can physical ailments or
psychosomatic illnesses be induced?

A March 1990 report from Bosnia-Herzegovina
in the former Yugoslavia suggests the latter may have already happened.
The report concerns 2,990 ethnic Albanians who were admitted
to hospital with complaints of lung and skin problems for which doctors
could find no physical cause. [12]

It is not a far step from manipulating a person's emotional
state to influencing bodily functions. Indeed, much of
the literature on documenting microwave effects on biological systems deals
with precisely this phenomenon. In fact, studies of the physical effects
of microwave exposure (including radio frequencies) generally preceeded
studies of mental effects.

A meeting sponsored by Defense & Foreign Affairs
and the International Strategic Studies Association was held in
Washington DC in 1983. High-level officials from many countries
met for this conference. They discussed psychological strategies related
to government and policymaking. A summary of the agenda
reads:

"The group will be discussing the essence of future
policymaking, for it must be increasingly clear to all that the
most effective tool of government and strategy is the mind...
If it's any consolation to the weapons-oriented among defense policymakers,
the new technologies of communications -- satellites, television, radio,
and mind-control beams -- are 'systems' which are more tangible than the
more philosophically based psychological strategies and operations.

[Eleanor White's comment: Anyone know where to get a copy?]

"But we should make no mistake; it will be the 'psychologically
based' systems which determine the world's fate in coming years: the condition
of the minds of populations and leaders. And we should not ignore the
fact that the USSR [this was in 1983] is working on electronic systems
to 'beam' messages directly into the brain. What good, then, are conventional
systems if these types of weapons are not countered? And, on a more basic
level, what good is a weapon system if public opinion or political con-
straints prohibit its deployment?" [13]

It is obvious that they found the answer to that last question.
If the public does not know about a weapon system, it cannot prohibit its
deployment. This is the situtation that applies to mind-control technology.

MIND CONTROL AGAINST 'POTENTIAL' ENEMIES

The US military is aware that certain actions or procedures
may not be acceptable to the American public. Metz and Kievit express these
concerns in their paper, "The Revolution in Military Affairs and Short
Conflict War." [14] "The use of new technology may also run counter
to basic American values. Information age -- and in particular, information
warfare -- technologies cause concerns about privacy... American values
also make the use of directed-energy weapons ... morally difficult, perhaps
unacceptable. The advantage of directed-energy weapons over conventional
ones is

Later they state: "We must decide whether innovative
military capabilities are, in fact, acceptable and desirable. That can only
happen through open debate. The military must be a vital participant, but
not the sole one."

But there has been no open debate.

On July 21, 1994, the US Department
of Defense proposed that non-lethal weapons be
used not only against declared enemies, but against anyone engaged
in activities that the DOD opposed. That could include almost any-
body and anything. Note that the mind-control technology is classified
under non-lethal weapons. [15]

A 1998 news item states that US Air Force
General John Jumper "predicts that the military will
have the tools to make potential enemies see, hear, and believe things that
do not exist" and that "The same idea was contained in a 15-volume
study by the USAF Scientific Advisory Board, issued in 1996, on how to maintain
US air and space superiority on the battlefields of the 21st century".
[16,17]

It seems that, in miltary parlance, a "prediction"
means: "Don't be surprised when you find out we've already got this,
but it's classified and we can't admit to it just yet."

Notice that General Jumper predicts that mind control
technology will be used against potential enemies. The military
and government agencies may apply this term to
any groupor individual they perceive as a threat
to their own interests. Potential enemies may be counter-culture individuals,
those of opposing political viewpoints, economic or financial competitors,
biological undesirables, etc. It is part of the military agenda to identify
potential threats so as to be prepared to meet them. Experience has shown
that the US Government (the CIA and FBI, for example) has moved against
these people or groups, slandering, harassing, even killing them, without
adequate cause or legal sanction.

A weapon that can be used in secret lends itself to abuse
by unethical individuals in positions of power. The military and secret
services have shown themselves often to be lacking in ethical constraints.
After all, the job of the military is war; it is killing people; and so,
just how this is accomplished may be considered irrelevant. Lesser evils,
like mind control, pale by comparison.

Of course, it can be argued that it is far more humane to
brainwash a person via mind control technology than it is to torture or
kill them. Others vehemently deny this. They'd rather be dead than a mental
slave to Big Brother! That is what revolutions are about. And if I recall
correctly, that is the idea behind the US Bill of Rights.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WARNS OF DANGERS

Awareness of the existence of mind-control technology, and
hence its dangers and possibility for misuse, seems to be more prevalent
in Europe than in other areas. The European Parliament
recently passed a "Resolution on environment, security, and
foreign policy". [18] This document includes these articles:

"23. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the
new 'non-lethal' weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies
also covered and regulated by international conventions...

"27. Calls for an international convention introducing
a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might
enable any form of manipulation of human beings."

The United States will ignore these resolutions, of course,
as it has other EP requests; for example, as mentioned in the same document:

"24. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral
Research Project) by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment
to be a global concern and calls for it's legal, ecological and ethical
implcations to be exam- ined by an international independent body before
any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the
United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence
to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting to be held by its competent
committee into the environ- mental and public risks connected with the
HAARP programme currently being funded in Alaska..."

One of HAARP's potential uses is a communications system.
The military officially acknowledges two communications-related applications:
(1) to replace the existing Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communications
system now operating in Michigan and Wisconsin; (2) to provide a way to
wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the
miltary's own communications system working. [19]

As we have seen, the mind-control subliminal messages
are carried on radio- frequency broadcasts.

The HAARP facility could be used to broadcast global
mind-control messages, or such messages could simply be inserted
into existing systems.

Dr. Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-correction
in Moscow, says in regard to this technology: "It is easily conceviable
that some Russian 'Satan', or let's say Iranian [or any other 'Satan'],
as long as he owns the appropriate means and finances, can inject himself
[intrude] into every conceivable computer network, into every conceivable
radio or television broad- cast, with relative technological ease, even
without disconnecting cables. You can intercept the [radio] waves
in the aether and then [subliminally] modulate every conceivable suggestion
into it. If this transpires over a long enough time period, it
accumulates in the heads of people. And eventually they can be artificially
manipulated with other additional measurements, to do that which this perpetrator
wants [them to do]. This is why [such technology] is rightfully feared."
[20]

A WORLDWIDE MIND CONTROL MISSION

To return to the USAF Fact Sheet, it concludes:

"In 1990 the EC-130 joined the newly formed Air Force
Special Operations Command and has since been designated Commando Solo,
with no change in mission. This one of a kind aircraft is consistently
improving its capabilities.

The next few years should see continued enhancements to
the EC-130 and its worldwide mission."

Judy Wall

About the Author:
Judy Wall is the Editor of RESONANCE, the newsletter of the Bioelectromagnetics
Special Interest Group of American MENSA Ltd. Viewpoints expressed here
are her own personal views.

All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.