It
was revealed last week (6 Feb 08) that the Beckett Newspaper Group breached a Court Order preventing
publication on a blanket basis, concerning the so-called HerstmonceuxBunny Boiler
case. This Order was made specifically to preserve the rights of the
parties, to a fair hearing. It begs the question, if such an Order was
made and breached, could the parties have received a fair hearing?

It
is unclear where this leaves Beckett Newspapers and what action the Police might
take to ensure publication of this nature is prevented by over eager
Reporters and Editors, who perhaps have an eye on sensationalism to
generate headlines to sell newspapers, rather than the damage that could
be inflicted on the persons affected. This is the subject of much media
attention following the revelation of multiple suicides at
Bridgend in Wales, in part attributed by some to the sensationalist newspaper
reporting. The latest girl to take her own life by hanging being 16 year
old Jenna Parry.

Jenna
Parry, 17th Suicide victim Bridgend

Readers
will know the Government, after consideration of Lord
Goldsmith, are
considering moves to protect the identity of those accused of sexual
offences, much the same as their accusers. This is because of the rise of
innocent men being convicted by Juries, and only after serving
considerable time in prison, is new evidence found to render guilty
verdicts unsafe.

This
could leave news hounds eager for material to print, out in the cold.
However, the moral implications are clear. Allegations of a sexual nature
ruin lives. See the links below to sample cases in 2007, where publication
and subsequent scandal have ruined lives. The accusers inevitably get away
scot-free. The newspaper hounds and the editors that helped ruin lives, on
occasion even sway public opinion to deliver an incorrect verdict, also
find themselves in the clear.

These
are some of the examples of women falsely accusing men who were innocent.
What is wrong with our legal system?

FACT:
Girls making allegations are coached. YES, this is true, they are
instructed how to give evidence and cosseted, sometimes isolated via a
video link to make it easier for them to appear sweetness and light.

Barristers
are loath to question hard, for fear of looking like bullies to a Jury.

PUBLIC
COMMENT

Here's
what readers have had to say!

This
is scandalous. I think that if the members of the jury knew just how slow
the appeals process is they would be much less inclined to find people
guilty when there is 'reasonable doubt'. In practice it is very difficult
when people are found guilty on this kind of case where there is NO
evidence; if there is no evidence in the first place then where is the
'fresh evidence' that may be required for an appeal to go ahead going to
come from? These cases only seem to win on appeals when a false accuser
admits to lying and that is very rare. Unfortunately as Mr
Carrington-Jones has said there could be many innocent
people in prison now as a result of convictions on non-evidence. Where
will his compensation come from? Will the woman be charged? -
Lily, Hull

Compensation
is rightly due to this poor chap, but should the public pay the price of
the crimes committed by these lying women? Shouldn't they be made to pay,
even if it means their being financially ruined for life? And surely it
cannot be the case that parole cannot be considered unless and until a
prisoner "admits" the crime for which he/she has been found
guilty? - Jim, London

What is wrong with
British justice system where allegations of sexual assault are
concerned? It all these cases it boils down to one girls word against the
persons accused. Heaven forbid the accused should lead an unusual
lifestyle. A Jury
would not understand this!! This could be one failing of the Jury system,
they are ordinary men and women. Perhaps justice is more important than to
trust to Juries? The statistics speak for themselves.

The
above is just a few of a number of persons likely to be investigated in
respect of certain cases brought against Wealden Action Group members, on
the instigation of known Masons, councillors, or planning officers, many
of which are themselves Masons.

The
above is just a few of a number of persons likely to be investigated in
respect of certain cases brought against Wealden Action Group members,
with the backing of known Masons, councillors,
police or planning officers, many
of which are themselves Masons.

Its
all too easy to set someone up. Nurse a wild allegation, coach and craft a
claim of abuse, use
a disturbed child or family as an excuse to go after someone who has had
the nerve to stand up against the powers that be. When this happens, it
makes a mockery of Freedom
of Speech, but it shuts down a would be protagonist and preserves the
status quo. The law as it stands allows accusers to remain anonymous,
while those accused are easy targets for the press as circulation
boosters. Lord
Goldsmith is considering a change in the law to protect those wrongly
accused, especially those more likely to come up against such accusation,
such as Teachers. But will he follow through?

And
what of the status quo? Global Warming,
Government Corruption,
Unaccountability, War and Famine.
Is this what you want to hear day in and day out? Would you rather see an
international society where everyone is treated fairly and decently?

F.A.C.T.
(Falsely Accused Carers and Teachers)
PO Box 3074
Cardiff CF3 3WZ
Tel: 029 2077 7499
E-mail: info@factuk.org
Website: www.factuk.org
Campaigning organisation and support group which provides help and advice
to falsely accused and wrongly convicted carers and teachers throughout
the UK. The website contains a range of information, leaflets, books and
links.

Guidance
for education staff and volunteers in schools
Website: www.lg-employers.gov.uk/conditions/education/allegations
This website has guidance on: 1) staff facing an allegation of abuse; 2)
preventing 'abuse of trust' for education staff; and 3) the conduct of
education staff working with young people.

If
you have been accused of child abuse by as a result of a 'recovered'
memory during psychotherapy or counselling you might
find the British
False Memory Society website helpful. Similarly if you are a
youth worker and have been falsey accused of child abuse you will find
the FAYL website helpful.

If
you have been wrongly convicted of a crime which you did not commit
you will find the innocence
web site and the innocent
network useful.

News
A to Z directory, please click on the links below to find your favourite
news or to contact the media to tell your story:

They
crucified him. The local police produced evidence at his trial
that was guaranteed to convict him, then made sure the localpress
published details of his conviction
so that nobody would believe
his revelations about corruption in local government. The
so-called forensic evidence turned out to be junk science, a
natural feature that was understood in the USA to be just that -
had not found its way into UK guidance. Presented in court as
controversial, what the Crown's expert meant was that US studies
did not accord with UK studies at the time. Two months after the
trial the UK studies recognised the US studies. The victim of this
injustice would not learn that until three years into his
sentence.

The
CCRC did not tell him about the cases they had referred to the
Court of Appeal - and in his case, they turned a blind eye. This
is a true story based on official documents. Not to be published
until after the subject's appeals in Europe are heard.

His
barrister didn't show the jury the accused' diaries, he should
have, because the girl's mother reminded the accused to send
Valentines cards every year - which she, err, seems to have
forgotten to mention to the court. She also forgot to tell
the prosecution about the existence of her own diaries. These
diaries reveal that the accused was not alone with the girl as she
had claimed. Why do you suppose her mother might hide this
information?

.

.

.

The
accused was instructed not to venture why the girl should make up
her story by his barrister, but of course he has a good idea.
Sadly, that cannot be revealed just yet for legal reasons. He did
say he could forgive a 15 year old for some kind of unthinking
hormone driven revenge for not doing what she had wanted, but not
a mature woman - who would have known better. The accused had
refused to get together with the girls mother. The girl wanted the
accused to get together with her mother. It's an or-else situation
and the accused was threatened - which information the defence
lawyers failed to introduce - despite instructions to the
contrary.

Local newspapers breached a Court Order prohibiting publication,
and published mid-trial, which to us seem the most damaging time
to publish, to virtually guarantee conviction. Nearly all the
local papers published at the same time - in orchestrated fashion
- obviously from a shared source; presumably the reporter
attending. Is that responsible reporting?

Once
they had convicted the victim of this injustice, the Crown tried
to prevent him publishing his story. Why would they do that?
Fortunately, Judge Cedric Joseph (this was his last case) was
persuaded by barrister Michael Harrison, that that would breach
the chaps human rights. The Judge agreed, subject to not naming
the girl or her mother.

We
think that the Crown's reluctance is to do with the way they
obtained their conviction. It was based on medical testimony,
which itself was based on out of date guidance from the Royal
College of Paediatric and Child Health from 1997. New guidance was
issued in 2008, just one month after the trial. Why did the Crown
not wait the extra month before going to trial? Well, we know the
answer to that, the new guidance confirmed that certain internal
marks are naturally occurring.

.

.

.

The
prosecution told the jury (or, rather, allowed their pet witness
to say it for them - which amounts to the same thing) that they
were supportive of the allegations - which was a deception on the
part of the Crown.

The
Crown had kept the defence waiting for more than 18 months and
delayed matters by refusing to hand back vital computer
information that they'd confiscated - claiming they might find
pornographic images. Of course the Crown were just making this up
and instead of letting the jury know that all of the accused'
computers were image free, they refused to confirm the results of
their investigations!

Normally,
a report on confiscated machines is supplied to the defence. Don't
you think the jury should have known that this man's computers
were clean?

You'll
have to wait for the subject's appeals in the ECHR to conclude
before this book is published. Maybe then we'll see an official
version in 2016/2017? European appeals take 4 years on average,
from the date of lodge. But first you have to exhaust any domestic
remedy. He has finally, as of February 2013.

This man served nearly four years for a crime he did not commit.
If you would like to know more about this developing story, please
Contact Us.

To send a potential news story for consideration by PA editors,
e-mail copy@pa.press.net.

Please
note that all attachments will be ripped out as these e-mails are directed into PA's news system. Any press release copy needs to be
copied and pasted into the e-mail itself. Content sent to copy@pa.press.net will be considered by the newsdesk and may be passed to a reporter to be followed up.

PA does, however, distribute full-text press releases directly to
newsrooms on their PA
Mediapoint service. To include a press release on this service, please contact PA's partners direct :

Remember
this one? Wealden District Council lied to several Inspectors at Appeals
from 1986 until 1997, after which the appellant decided the system was so
corrupt, that he'd simply show the Secretary of State that Victorio Scarpa,
Doug Moss, Ian Kay, Ashley Brown, Chezel Bird, Derek Holness, Christine
Nuttall and David
Phillips were all working together to conceal the truth. They said
that the original timber building from 1909 was replaced by a corrugated
iron shed. They called it a "tin shack" during planning
committee meetings. Where's the 'tin' then blockheads? An inconvenient
truth this may be, but think on the £500,000 of taxpayers money this
council spent trying to prove the impossible. They used all means at their
disposal to try to bury the occupier - including an attempt at bankruptcy.
No wonder Britain is in the state it is - when trusted council officials
try to hide the truth - at our expense! The question is now, who is going
to jail for malfeasance in public office? That is one for Eric
Pickles and Chris
Grayling.

If
Wealden District Council, had got their way, the buildings would now be a
haunted place with nothing standing. That is what happens when a council
refuse to give a beneficial use to landowners - archaeological remains
just rot away - even quicker if the construction is timber. Councils know
this. Wealden DC tried to accelerate the rot, by putting tree preservation
orders on nearby sycamore trees. It is nothing short of a miracle that Nelson
Kruschandl had the stamina to take on a council over what is now 30
years - and finally to prove that what they were saying was bunkum! But
then, Mr Kruschandl is a British (Colonial) Bulldogand this was a war.
He is quoted as saying: "You need to have the patience of a saint,
the courage of a lion and the cunning of a fox."

WE ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY
FOR THE ACCURACY OF ANY FEATURED LINKS

IF
YOU HAVE ANY GOOD STORIES TO TELL WE'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU WITH
PICTURES, ETC. OR, WHY NOT BUILD A WEBSITE
OF YOUR OWN TO TELL YOUR STORY. WE WILL LINK TO YOUR SITE WITH A SHORT SUMMARY.