A call for an evolved understanding of emotion

January 4, 2012
By Matt Collette

In a new scholarly review, psychology professor Lisa Feldman Barrett points out that the beliefs about emotion guiding many security practices today may be flawed. Credit: Mary Knox Merrill.

(Medical Xpress) -- Many scientists believe that all people experience and express the same biologically basic emotions  an idea they have attributed to evolutionist Charles Darwin and one that has shaped modern security training and law enforcement techniques.

But that belief is not rooted in sound scientific study, says Northeasterns Lisa Feldman Barrett, Distinguished Professor of Psychology in the College of Science, who wrote a review of recent research for the Association for Psychological Sciences journal, Current Directions in Psychological Science, titled Was Darwin Wrong About Emotional Expressions?

It has been assumed for many years that when you feel some emotion, you automatically show that emotion on your face. This belief guides security training at airports, FBI training and so on, Barrett said. But theres a lot of research out there to show that emotions are not written on the face, that theres a lot of context that a perceiver like you or me brings to the judgment of facial expressions.

Backers of a basic emotions approach cite Darwin, who wrote Expression of Emotion in Man and Animals after his famous Origin of the Species. That book argued that emotions were states of minds that were automatically expressed across animal species.

But Darwins views were that these emotional expressions were vestigial, more like your tailbone  something that evolution carried forward but which may no longer be of any use, Barrett said. So Darwin was arguing that these expressions are no longer functional, thereby showing that they must exist as an inherited characteristic.

Commonly held beliefs in psychology include that humans automatically express a handful of emotions, like sadness through a frown or anger through a scowl. But recent research  by Barretts own lab at Northeastern and others  has challenged that longstanding hypothesis. Instead, the new research shows that small changes in an experiment can lead to dramatically different results. And recent articles published in the journals Nature and Science call into question the use of security-training techniques based on the basic emotion approach.

The fact is, its not really clear from the existing evidence that people actually make these expressions on an everyday basis, Barrett said. When do people actually pout in sadness? You certainly couldnt win an Academy Award for pouting in sadness.

Barrett said that further study of emotion beyond the most popular hypothesis is important, especially since the potentially flawed research has become the basis for law enforcement and homeland security protocols and procedures.

The idea that facial expressions are a beacon for you to read is just not right, she said. Its a really popular view and you can find data that supports it, but you can also find a tremendous amount of data that does not. That research doesnt seem to be getting much play, and it needs to.

Related Stories

For a hormone, oxytocin is pretty famous. Its the cuddle chemicalthe hormone that helps mothers bond with their babies. Salespeople can buy oxytocin spray on the internet, to make their clients trust ...

(Medical Xpress) -- People who claim to recognize a burned imprint of Jesus on a piece of toast are channeling what Northeastern University Distinguished Professor of Psychology Lisa Feldman Barrett calls a self-interested ...

Contrary to what many psychological scientists think, people do not all have the same set of biologically "basic" emotions, and those emotions are not automatically expressed on the faces of those around us, according to ...

(Medical Xpress) -- That cartoon scary face  wide eyes, ready to run  may have helped our primate ancestors survive in a dangerous wild, according to the authors of an article published in Current Directions in ...

Recommended for you

Babies learn language best by interacting with people rather than passively through a video or audio recording. But it's been unclear what aspects of social interactions make them so important for learning.

One of the big questions intelligence researchers grapple with is just how differences in intelligence are reflected in the human brain. Researchers at ETH Zurich have succeeded in studying further details relating to suspected ...

(Medical Xpress)—Dichromacy is a color vision defect in which one of the three types of cone photoreceptors is missing. The condition is hereditary and sex-linked, mostly affecting males. Although researchers have explored ...

New research reveals that the more people think they know about a topic in general, the more likely they are to allege knowledge of completely made-up information and false facts, a phenomenon known as "overclaiming." The ...

For those who believe that birth order influences traits like personality and intelligence, a study of 377,000 high school students offers some good news: Yes, the study found, first-borns do have higher IQs and consistently ...

My understanding of prof. Barrett's point is that the former is not proof and the later proves it. I consider myself Darwinian in belief and understanding that evolution does not occur or advance as a constant for every member of a species. I have observed people that can lie with absolute confidence and others like myself that should never attempt it. That some are able to commit cruel and murderous acts with no emotional response appears related to autism that emotions for some may not be defective but rather not available.

To Corban: You form an hypothesis based on the structure of your perception and understanding. It then becomes a matter of searching for what you have predetermined as what you are hoping to find. The process is guided by you to reach only that moment.

That we are are least 10,000 yrs behind where we should be, while not proven is at least supported by the existence of the Rhind papyrus that most of our knowledge is acquired through trial and error. The resistance to change is also resistance many times to a loss in monetary compensation by those in control of the current structure that is considered knowledge.

Please sign in to add a comment.
Registration is free, and takes less than a minute.
Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.