A Provocative Space of Critical Conversation

Why Anniversaries Matter

Why Anniversaries Matter

It’s Cinco de Mayo and, against my better judgment, I’m out at a noisy, overcrowded, Mexican restaurant, trying to get the bartender’s attention so I can order a much-needed margarita. I overhear a conversation about what Cinco de Mayo commemorates, the final verdict being that it is a celebration of Mexican Independence day. I know that this isn’t true, but I also know that I’m no better than the participants in this conversation, as I’m out here celebrating a holiday without knowing exactly what I’m celebrating. Not Mexican Independence Day I’m sure, but I can’t for the life of me remember what it does commemorate. I wonder what it means to celebrate without knowing the reason why.

Perhaps an argument could be made here for the ascendance of spectacle and celebration, for commemorative events taking on a meaning and importance based on ritual rather than remembrance. Maybe we live in a time and a place defined by bullet points and power point presentations, where history is boiled down to a holiday, where the details fall by the wayside and public drunkenness and wanton celebration find justification in the commemoration of any event that allows us a bit of freedom from the Puritanism of our daily lives. By this line of reasoning, such anniversaries are little more than empty vessels to be filled by the repressed desires of the celebrants, ciphers floating without reference. One could even go so far as to argue that anniversaries in and of themselves have become nearly irrelevant; commemoration has been flattened across the public sphere to the point where everyone and everything can have an anniversary: people, animals, buildings, events, stores, corporations, products, television shows. Anniversaries have been indelibly linked now to commercial language; indeed, one would be hard pressed to find an anniversary whose commemoration hasn’t been transformed into an occasion to buy, sell, or consume.

Given all this, what then is the utility of an anniversary? Why are anniversaries still important, even after their rampant commercialization, indiscriminate application, and often specious interpretation?

Much has been made of the drive towards instant gratification as a defining characteristic of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The statement that the internet puts the world at our fingertips has gone from a revolutionary idea to a cliché. And yet, along with the expectation of access to everything all the time, another shift has quietly occurred. It finds its genesis and its metaphor in a device/service offered by our cable and satellite television companies.

The digital video recorder, with its ability to pause and rewind live television, is subtly shaping the way we live our lives. The marketing for this product promises that we will never miss anything again–should the real world intrude on our television watching, we can simply hit rewind and not miss a single moment of programming. We can record our favorite shows and skip through the commercials with the press of a button. The DVR has singularly revolutionized the way we watch television. Once one gets used to the idea, it’s surprising how quickly it translates to other venues. More than once I’ve caught myself reaching to push some non-existent button on my car stereo, attempting to rewind what someone has said on the radio. And of course, while that button might not exist in my car, a few minutes on the Internet will likely yield that radio station’s website with an archive of the program in question, allowing me to listen to it again whenever I want. The same is true of television and, if something is not on an officially sanctioned network website (or even if it is), it’s almost certainly on YouTube. There is no such thing as missing a televised event now that everything ends up on YouTube. The DVR is a metaphor for how we live our lives, where everything is instantly repeatable, instantly archived, and always accessible. Nothing again will ever be “can’t miss”; indeed, nothing can ever be truly missed again, as everything is instantly documented, archived, and available with a couple of clicks. History repeats itself, literally.

Within this context, the anniversary does still hold value and meaning. The anniversary makes the argument that time does matter, that time is real, that despite all our technology time is still the one thing we cannot change, alter, or halt. An anniversary is the insistence that today is different from yesterday is different from tomorrow. When we commemorate an anniversary, we are not just celebrating an event, we are recognizing the passage of time. An anniversary marks an important event, but it is not just about remembering that event, it is an affirmation that what has happened between then and now is also important. Anniversaries tell us that life is important, that life is not repeatable, rewindable, or redactable. Time marches on and every moment is singular and unique and precious.

We may not have known it on that margarita-soaked night, but in its own way Cinco de Mayo commemorates the significance of time. The Battle of Puebla took place on the Fifth of May, 1862, with the Mexican army successfully, if temporarily, forcing a withdrawal of the occupying French forces. It is widely recognized that French General Charles de Lorecenz’s fatal error was beginning his campaign too late in the day.

Popular Posts

Hockey Moms, Prayer Nazis, and Why I Love But Fear People Like Sarah PalinRemember that really nice girl who greeted you warmly as a potential friend when you first arrived at college? Remember how she conscientiously invited you to dinner, or to study, or to her Christian fellowship activity? Remember the conversations about religion that you thought were a precursor to sharing secrets among friends? But then you expressed a different opinion, or you joined a liberal club, or you started to explore your sexuality, and suddenly, you felt a sharp pain in your back? Betrayed by some evangelical whom you thought was a friend?

Your 258 Closest FriendsAn acquaintance of mine claims to have 258 friends. That number could be larger, actually; the figure only represents the number of boon companions who show up on her MySpace page and not those additional pals who might appear in real time but avoid online social networking.

The Church Needs a New Confession: Pathetic-ness as Moral FailingOvert evil is easy to discuss. It’s banal evil that is hard to acknowledge. And you can’t confess to a sin until that sin has been acknowledged. Churches spent the rest of the twentieth century acknowledging the sins of genocide. However, in her writings, Hannah Arendt, who witnessed the trials against the Nazis, wrote about how the Nazi war criminals resisted acknowledging that their boring, nine-to-five office jobs of record keeping or laboratory work on the use of chemicals in the gas chambers had actually been evil. In her book, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, Arendt chronicles the wartime activities and trial of German Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann, who claimed that he was only doing his bureaucratic job as a transportation logician.

Would You Prefer Gay Marriage or No Marriage?The vicious debates surrounding California’s Proposition 8 this election season again evoke the right-wing stranglehold on the discourse of (gay) marriage. The missing piece here, of course, is the somewhat-amorphous third group: those (gay and straight) who oppose gay marriage because it assimilates queer people into a problematic, sexist, patriarchal, classist, and homophobic institution. Perhaps in their efforts to avoid the stereotype of being “anti-family-values,” left-wing folks have failed to formally ask these questions: Why marriage at all? Why not work collectively to end marriage, or at least divorce marriage from the conferral of rights, for both queers and heterosexuals? If marriage tangibly institutionalizes the supremacy of heterosexual kinship structures, as Judith Butler has argued, why should anyone get married?

Recent Posts

The New, Hard Work of PlayPerhaps we would all enjoy ourselves more... if we let kids be kids when and in the places they need to be kids, and parents be adults when and in the places they need to be adults.

What We Lose When We Lose GodAO Scott has recently proposed that we are living in a post-partiarchal age that is also the end of adulthood. Here I want to suggest that the death of God continues to be a more fundamental liberating loss of our cultural moment.

Red Baiting MandelaIn the wake of Nelson Mandela’s death in 2013, a small, but vocal, number of critics decided to pull out an old canard about his affiliation with Communism.