When the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the federal Defense of Marriage Act this past June, Justice Antonin Scalia dissented, warning that the decision inevitably would be replicated in the states.

And now Scalia’s theory is proving prescient, as we see HERE:

For the second time in a week, a federal judge embraced U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent from this summer’s ruling overturning the federal Defense of Marriage Act in a case challenging a state’s ban on gay marriage.

Scalia was adamant in his dissent that the logic of the DOMA decision would result in state bans being

...

Read more

When the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the federal Defense of Marriage Act this past June, Justice Antonin Scalia dissented, warning that the decision inevitably would be replicated in the states.

And now Scalia’s theory is proving prescient, as we see HERE:

For the second time in a week, a federal judge embraced U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent from this summer’s ruling overturning the federal Defense of Marriage Act in a case challenging a state’s ban on gay marriage.

Scalia was adamant in his dissent that the logic of the DOMA decision would result in state bans being