Doctor Ehlert, this feedback is a little too vague to be helpful. By only suggesting that the author indicate the pig species and add a test log, you run the risk of making them feel that the rest of the draft is free of issue.

Author, this is a quick skim. Your special containment procedures are not written to the current standards and suffer from specification to a fault(by specifying the exact size of the cell, you indicate that containment will fail with every other size, for example), and unreasonable authority jumps(Level 4 personnel are typically site directors and MTF commanders. Senior research personnel would be better). Furthermore, this SCP is currently an alcohol imbibing pig that makes people want to bonk it. This sounds a bit similar to the toaster that also has this effect.

I recommend getting the base idea polished up in the Ideas and Brainstorming Forum before you try fixing the draft. Go to that forum, post a quick summary of the concept you want to write up and the story(if present) you’re trying to tell (don't link the draft unless someone asks). The reviewers there can help you make pre-existing elements more interesting, chop out elements that aren’t interesting, and perhaps even propose new elements that improve the quality of your article. Good luck.