2
JLBC 2 What is the Marketplace Fairness Act?  1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision stated that absent federal legislation, states could not collect sales tax from retailers with no physical presence (“nexus”) in their state  Marketplace Fairness Act is Federal legislation that would enable states to collect sales tax from those remote retailers with no nexus in their state  Remote sellers include online and catalogue retailers  Retailers with less than $1 million in remote sales annually would be exempted

3
JLBC 3 MFA Requires States to Simplify Their Sales Tax Laws  State must be in compliance with either: The Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement – Arizona is not currently a member state of SSUTA Other alternative simplification requirements, including establishing a uniform sales tax base throughout the state  Does Arizona currently meet the simplification mandates under MFA? Several areas which do not currently comply with the MFA guidelines: different tax bases at the city vs. state level, and city use of tiered rates (such as lower tax rate for single large purchases)

4
JLBC 4 Any Revenue Gain From Marketplace Fairness Act Would Come From Reducing Non-Compliance  Online sales from retailers outside Arizona are already subject to use tax – however there is a significant amount of non-compliance  MFA is intended to significantly affect non-compliance by requiring retailer to collect required tax at time of sale  Non-compliance can vary depending on type of commerce Business-to-business (B2B) or business-to-consumer (B2C)

5
JLBC 5 What Are The Potential Sales Tax Revenue Gains?  University of Tennessee study estimated the total nationwide increase in state and local sales tax collections from e-commerce legislation to be $11.4 billion in 2012  State and local sales tax gains in Arizona were estimated to be $370 million (State share = $190 M?)  UT estimates included the impact of e-commerce only, not other remote sales (e.g., mail and phone orders)

7
JLBC 7 What Are Some of the Caveats of the UT Estimates? - Differing Estimates on Amounts of E-Commerce  UT Study based on 2006 U.S. census data on nationwide amount of e-commerce Is UT assumption of 9% annual growth (2007 – 2012) in online sales reasonable? Or will growth rates slow as most households gain broadband internet access?  Arizona’s share of US e-commerce – UT study assumes 2.9% compared to 2.1% share of US population

8
JLBC 8 What Are Some of the Caveats of the UT Estimates? (Continued)  UT estimate assumes an overall e-commerce non-compliance rate of 25% Business-to-business transactions already typically viewed as having a low non-compliance rate Growth of “brick and click” (online sales from traditional stores) tends to reduce business-to- consumer (B2C) non-compliance Is there enough overall non-compliance to generate estimated revenue gains?  However, non-compliance is by definition impossible to measure and is therefore highly uncertain  Uncertain impact of exempting smaller retailers given lack of exact data

9
JLBC 9 Amazon Already Collects Arizona Sales Tax  Amazon has started collecting sales tax for any goods sold to Arizonans  Based on SEC filings, and the experience of Amazon in other states, JLBC Staff estimated that General Fund would gain an additional $15 million in FY 2014 from Amazon sales.  Therefore, any state revenue gain from MFA would exclude Amazon sales.  Amazon’s market share of online sales highlights need to better understand what types of sales MFA would impact

10
JLBC 10 Other Issues  MFA bill (S. 743) passed out of U.S. Senate in May but its fate in the U.S. House remains uncertain.  U.S. House is considering removing the small business exemption.  Unknown issues such as implementation process, litigation and compliance costs if MFA were enacted