and that matches my experience as well (as limited as it may be). In general my impression is that CFS and SD are roughly on par when it comes to 3D smoothness.

[…]

Thanks Kenneth for the testing! I’ve created a graph out of yournumbers:

http://people.redhat.com/mingo/misc/cfs-sd-ut2004-perf.jpg

(it also includes the SD numbers you got with the turn-yield-into-NOPhack applied.)

This entry was posted
on Tuesday, July 31st, 2007 at 10:55 pm and is filed under News.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.