Recent Comments

About

Owner of PageF30.com.
Translator of Demian by Hermann Hesse into English - an interlinear translation for German students and those who want to see the original text.
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/mithradates
Fluent in Japanese, Korean. Proficient in Mandarin, Turkish, German, French, Portuguese, others.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

All three Wikipedias from the Baltic countries are about to reach a new milestone, so here's where they are at the moment:

Lithuanian is now at 98,468, so getting quite close to 100,000. Passing 100,000 might not happen for another week or two or three though. The Lithuanian Wikipedia has always seemed to be quite conscious of the article count, and recently they've added a bar as well:

Next is Estonian, which is about to reach 70,000.

And finally Latvian:

Not sure what the deal is with Latvian - just barely on the verge of 25,000 articles is quite low. Even Occitan has over 20,000 and Latin is now at 33,000+. The populations of the respective countries are 3.3 million for Lithuania, 1.3 million for Estonia, and 2.2 million for Latvia. Perhaps it's just lack of interest. The Korean Wikipedia spent quite a bit of time at a pretty tiny size for its population, but after reaching something over 30,000 it really began to take off and now is at 122,000+, and has now become quite the source of information for a lot of subjects that can't be found anywhere else. Latvian just may not have reached that critical mass yet.

While we're on the subject, a bit of commentary on the Baltic languages: everybody knows that Estonian is not a Baltic language in spite of being a Baltic country, and this is written in every guidebook to the Baltic states. This is of course true, but this is looking at the languages from a historical perspective: Estonian is part of one branch, Latvian and Lithuanian are from another, etc. But what is often more important to the reader is not whether two languages are historically related (i.e. the descendants of a single historical language), but whether learning Language A is helpful in learning Language B. That is, whether the knowledge and habits one has acquired from learning one help when moving on to another. And from this point of view, the three languages are quite complementary. Here are a few ways in which the three complement each other:

- no articles. Translating from one language without articles into another without them takes less effort than if one has them and the other doesn't.

- And of course there is the influence of other neighboring languages, such as Russian and some others, which have also brought in a certain amount of shared vocabulary.

This is a little similar to Turkish and Persian, two languages that also have completely different linguistic ancestors but have a fair amount of shared influence, making one helpful in learning the other. Turkish and Persian have a much larger shared corpus than Estonian and Latvian/Lithuanian, but then again the three Baltic states all use the Latin alphabet whereas Turkish uses the Latin alphabet and Iran the Perso-Arabic script, so they may just balance each other out in this way.