Top Ten Posts in 2012: 1- Do You Really Support Our Troops!

I watched the President’s State of the Union speech last night. Very intentionally, President Obama framed his more controversial and political proposals with non-controversial, military bookends. He started with the removal of troops from Iraq and finished with the elimination of Osama bin Laden. At every mention of the troops with their sacrifices and victories, both sides of Congress and all visitors stood and applauded.

If there is one thing upon which Americans generally agree, it is that the country stands behind the troops on the ground! Even when we disagree over why they are there or how long, no one ever goes on record saying our soldiers did a terrible job!

I couldn’t help but wonder if the American church of Christ feels that same way about its boots on the ground! I’m talking about the foot soldiers we send out to combat the kingdom of darkness all over the world—aka missionaries.

Times were when these soldiers of the cross seemed to be highly respected. Missionaries like McCaleb, Shewmaker, Benson, and later Gatewood, Hare, and Bixler were well-known names with heroic stature in our churches. Because of the big splash the Brazil team made in the early sixties and because of their innovative approach, they too continue to enjoy notoriety, especially in older, established churches.

I wonder how many of us can name five missionaries that have entered their field in this millennium—or even the last quarter century? Unless you are on a mission committee that sent some recent workers or a teacher of missions, or working in a missions organization, I’m afraid of the results!

Our churches are still committed to missions, and we are still sending out new missionaries, so what has changed? Here is a short list of some of the things I fear have reduced our enthusiasm for the troops:

Because it is now more expensive to go abroad than to work at home, churches are choosing more domestic mission projects.

Also because of economics, churches are choosing to support national preachers instead of Americans. National preachers are viewed as requiring much less support, no travel funds, and no benefits! What a deal!

Foreign mission work is seen more as a competitor to local work. This sometimes has economic roots and sometimes geo-political. When the nation is tired of foreign entanglements, the church becomes tired of them as well.

Because of fewer services per week, i.e., many churches only meeting Sunday morning for a general assembly, with other meetings done in classes or in homes, fewer are willing to open their pulpits for missionary reporting. The average member in the pew has very little exposure to the work and sacrifice of current missionaries.

Mission work is low on the ladder of ministerial respect. Fairly or unfairly, one hears the comment that people go to the mission field who can’t make it or who don’t want to fit in at home. Test yourself: rank in value to the kingdom the following types of ministers: mega-church preachers, small church preachers, youth ministers, campus ministers, worship ministers, church planters, and foreign missionaries.

A nineteenth-century attitude toward foreign missions predominates, which says missionaries should go to third-world countries and live in poverty, working only with people who are physically needy. Interestingly enough, as Africa has become one of the most Christian continents on the planet, it has become an even greater magnet for American mission work! If there are more Christians in Africa than in the United States, perhaps American missionaries should be choosing to go other places. (I’m not saying that we should not continue to aid African Christians in their work. American Christians still have much more wealth than African Christians.)

This list is certainly not exhaustive, but perhaps will stimulate the conversation about missions among us.

I would love to see the day return when foreign missionaries are greeted with standing ovations, when churches line up to invite them to speak of their work, when mission committees bang on the doors of Christian colleges and missions organizations, looking for good people to send to their mission points.

What can you do to raise the stature of those soldiers of the cross who serve faithfully and sacrificially in the spiritual battlefields of this world?

2 Responses

Thank you, Mark! I hope the ones who need to think deeply about your questions and do some soul searching are reading this blog. I appreciate the help provided the mission work God called me to in St. George, Transylvania, Romania.

Let’s Start Talking sends teams to help people improve their conversational English while studying The Bible. Eastern European Missions provides us with Bibles in the language of the nationals. Women of Eastern European Missions now recruits women to come help me personally with my daily work among the people. Healing Hands International sends clothing, medical supplies. And many individuals pray for my work, and for me, and donate to God’s Children, non profit foundation, to help carry on the benevolence and the seed sowing.

BTW, Dan’s family (self supporting missionaries in Fairbanks, Alaska, after WWII, were personal friends of Bro. McCaleb. Once, in the dead of Alaskan Winter, the Boyds were running out of firewood. A check for $25 from Bro. McCaleb arrived in the mail in the nick of time! He was retired by that time. When Dan was a Freshman at Pepperdine, he visited Bro. McCaleb regularly.