Comprehensive coverage of personal injury and civil litigation

Second Amendment

November 17, 2014

Early this week, the lengthy debate on gun laws has made its way to the spotlight --- out of San Francisco.

A three-judge panel from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will be hearing arguments as to whether or not the gun law that was passed by Sunnyvale voters in California in the previous year is constitutional.

Gun rights groups, as well the National Rifle Association, are saying the law, which bars residents from possessing gun magazines that holds over 10 rounds, is in violation of the Second Amendment.

Citizens of Sunnyvale claim the law doesn’t intrude on their Second Amendment rights to possess a firearm in their homes for self-defense. Sunnyvale says the limiting the use of magazines makes a lot more sense since they’re used often in mass shooting including the gun shooting incident in Newtown, Connecticut, a few years back.

A California District Judge maintained the law saying that while the law in Sunnyvale had implications of the Second Amendment, the Second Amendment rights issue is said to be “light.”

July 28, 2014

The Washington D.C. area had the last complete ban on carrying a gun in public until today when the District Court struck down the ban. The case started in federal courts which ruled in another case back in 2008. The case had ruled that the Constitutional second amendment allows for individuals to retain guns at least in their home for self defense purposes. One year later, the Supreme Court extended that right for the rest of the nation. However, courts have continued to argue whether or not an individual can retain that constitutional right outside their homes. Senior District Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Hr. who sits in Syracuse, New York made a ruling which allowed the Second Amendment right to extend beyond one's home. He noted that it is a fundamental right created by the Supreme Court six years ago. The judge barred city officials from being able to enforce the ban which was first imposed in 2008.

July 2, 2014

Target Corp. issued a request earlier today asking its customers to no longer carry guns in stores even if the store is in a region which deems it legal. The large retailer stated that it was respectfully requesting that customers refrain from carrying guns in their stores. Target officials stated that bringing firearms into their stores creates an environment that is not conducive to family friendly shopping. Target's anti-gun stance has come after gun rights groups had posted images of individuals carrying rifles through the Dallas Target. Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America responded to the photographs by launching a campaign to pressure stores to ban guns from their stores. Shannon Watts, the group's founder led a massive on-line social campaign to boycott the retailer. The National Rifle Association first scolded the Texas gun rights members for carrying their rifles in the stores and stated that it was "not neighborly." Later, NRA recanted the statement and apologized.

May 15, 2014

Dick Heller has challenged the courts regarding the constitutionality of their regulations on gun owners. Heller claimed that gun laws and forced regulations are violating the Second Amendment. In 2010 the federal district court rejected Heller’s arguments. Once it was appealed, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia also affirmed that the gun regulations and requirement of registering long guns applied also to hand guns as well. The court also upheld the ban on large capacity magazines as well as assault weapons.

The judge stated that the required registering of long guns is no more of a burden than the same requirement for handguns. Boasberg also proceeded to affirm that the four registration requirements were in the public’s best interest as well as in the interest of police protection and public safety. The present requirements to stay in place include: fingerprinting, photographing, and bringing the actual firearm and presenting it in person to the registrar.

April 15, 2011

The Second Amendment Foundation's challenge to a federal law that prevents American citizens who reside outside the United States
from purchasing firearms while they are in this country will be allowed
to move forward, under a ruling today by the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia.

The case involves Stephen Dearth, a natural-born U.S. citizen now living in Canada, who is prevented from buying a firearm in this country because he does not currently reside here. The case was filed in March 2009.
SAF and Mr. Dearth challenged the law's constitutionality because it
prevents Dearth from exercising his Second Amendment rights. SAF is
represented by Virginia attorney Alan Gura.

"This is a significant ruling in our favor," said SAF Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb.
"Many American citizens face the same dilemma as Mr. Dearth. They are
good citizens, they've committed no crimes, and they would certainly be
allowed to exercise their Second Amendment rights, except for the fact
that they live in another country."

The district
court dismissed the case, contending that plaintiffs have no standing.
This morning's ruling reverses that court, and remands the case back for
further action.

In its ruling,
the Appeals Court agreed with Dearth's argument that he suffers an
"ongoing injury" because the government continues to deny him the right
to purchase a firearm. The court said "we conclude his injury is
sufficiently real and immediate to support his standing to challenge
those laws."

The issue
arises with a question on the Federal Form 4473 which asks firearm
buyers their state of residence. Since Dearth does not have a state of
residence, he cannot legally complete a firearms transaction. SAF filed
the case against Attorney General Eric Holder,
seeking to enjoin him from enforcing the law. The lawsuit also contends
that the gun law violates Dearth's Fifth Amendment right of equal
protection.

The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org)
is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research,
publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right
and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974,
The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and
conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the
consequences of gun control.

July 15, 2010

The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a federal lawsuit against Westchester County, New York and its handgun
permit licensing officers, seeking a permanent injunction against
enforcement of a state law that allows carry licenses to be denied
because applicants cannot show "good cause."

SAF is joined in the
lawsuit by Alan Kachalsky and Christina Nikolov, both Westchester County residents whose permit
applications were denied. Kachalsky's denial was because he could not
"demonstrate a need for self protection distinguishable from that of the
general public." Nikolov's was denied because she could not demonstrate
that there was "any type of threat to her own safety anywhere." In
addition to Westchester County, Susan Cacace and Jeffrey
Cohen, both serving at times as handgun permit licensing
officers, are named as defendants. The lawsuit was filed in U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New
York, White Plains Division.

Attorney Alan Gura is representing the plaintiffs, along
with attorney Vincent Gelardi with
Gelardi & Randazzo of Rye Brook, NY.
Gura recently represented SAF and the Illinois State Rifle Association
in their landmark Second Amendment Supreme Court victory over the City of Chicago.

Under New York Penal
Code Section 400.00, handgun carry permit applicants must "demonstrate
good cause for the issuance of a permit," the lawsuit alleges. This
requirement violates the Second Amendment, according to the plaintiffs.

"American citizens like
Alan Kachalsky and Christina Nikolov should not have to
demonstrate good cause in order to exercise a constitutionally-protected
civil right," noted SAF Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb. "Our civil rights, including the
right to keep and bear arms, should not be subject to the whims of a
local government or its employees, just because they don't think someone
'needs' a carry permit. Nobody advocates arming criminals or mental
defectives, but honest citizens with clean records should not be denied
out of hand."

"Thanks to our recent
victory before the Supreme Court," Gottlieb stated, "the Second
Amendment now applies to state and local governments. Our lawsuit is a
reminder to state and local bureaucrats that we have a Bill of Rights in
this country, not a 'Bill of Needs'."

The Second Amendment
Foundation (www.saf.org) is the
nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing
and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage
to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation
has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many
programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of
gun control.