I am 99.9% sure that you can recruit multiple units. In one of my games, and in one of my previews, I explained how I recruited one unit and then activated that unit to get enough influence to recruit another unit. The walkthrough says "You can buy things of the same or different types."

Units in the Unit offer do not replenish until the start of the next round.

Advanced Actions in the Unit offer do not replenish until the start of the next round.

Spells - Again, I think with enough Influence and Mana you can buy multiple spells, and if you have a bazillion Influence points, you could also recruit Unit(s) that have the Mage Tower icon.

In all my games, nobody has ever bought more than 1 Spell on their turn, but the question about when they replenish is a good one. I have contacted Vlaada and will post the official answer on that soon. In the meantime, it will probably never happen, so you can carry on playing

You get the stuff you bought (or acquired by some card effect) immediately. Only combat rewards are claimed at the end of your turn.

The new units you can use immediately (for example to recruit more influence, heal, etc.). The new spells and advanced actions go on the top of your draw pile (unless stated otherwise), and you can even draw them on the same turn (when you use effect allowing you to draw a card).

As for replenishing of Spell or Advanced Action offer: you may replenish them immediatelly, but note that this is "revealing new information", so you are not allowed to change your mind then and roll back before this point. At any case, you should replenish the offers before your turn ends.

Note: When planning your turn, you can usually also plan what item to buy or acquire, and your turn is usually simplier when you are interacting than when you are fighting, so it should not slow down the game. The combat and level-up rewards are claimed at the end of the turn, because you usually do not have time or information to think about them in advance: you are concentrating on the combat itself, and also some randomness is included in many cases when determining what reward options you have.

A more complex question. I was sieging a city. I played a spell (I think Tremor) in its ultimate form which did reduce the armor of all enemies by 2 (I'm not sure here but that doesn't matter) and if the enemy is fortified by 4 (twice the amount). Now 'I played a red spell which reduces the amount of armor of all enemies by one and site fortifications doesn't matter.

2 of the enemies were fortified so it is clear that they lose 5 armor (4+1). But what happens to the not fortified enemy.a) The lose the fortification bonus. Therefore, they only lose 3 armor.b) The tremor card was played when they still were fortified (thanks to the city) so they also lose 5 armor

And a question, some of the enemies hat fire resistance was I even allowed to play the red spell. To my understanding yes, since it didn't target a specific enemy. Is this correct ?

A short clarification: The "Crystallize" card basic effect does count as the only-one-die-from-the-source-rule? If so, the effect can be explain as "spent one basic mana, if it's blue, gain a crystal of any color, if not, gain a crystal of the color spent"?

A short clarification: The "Crystallize" card basic effect does count as the only-one-die-from-the-source-rule? If so, the effect can be explain as "spent one basic mana, if it's blue, gain a crystal of any color, if not, gain a crystal of the color spent"?

A more complex question. I was sieging a city. I played a spell (I think Tremor) in its ultimate form which did reduce the armor of all enemies by 2 (I'm not sure here but that doesn't matter) and if the enemy is fortified by 4 (twice the amount). Now 'I played a red spell which reduces the amount of armor of all enemies by one and site fortifications doesn't matter.

2 of the enemies were fortified so it is clear that they lose 5 armor (4+1). But what happens to the not fortified enemy.a) The lose the fortification bonus. Therefore, they only lose 3 armor.b) The tremor card was played when they still were fortified (thanks to the city) so they also lose 5 armor

And a question, some of the enemies hat fire resistance was I even allowed to play the red spell. To my understanding yes, since it didn't target a specific enemy. Is this correct ?

Earthquake (improved Tremor) does indeed reduce all enemies Armor by 2 or 4 if fortified. All enemies in a city are fortified, so this would be -4 to all. Your example shows a non-fortified enemy in a city assault. The only time this would happen is if you assault a city and provoke (or challenge) a rampaging enemy at the same time - so lets assume you do that.

Thats just Earthquake though. Now we combine it with Demolish which ignores site fortifications. It is now a question for Vlaada. Does the order in which you play these cards matter?

EDIT: Official answer from Vlaada. The order is important. If you play Earthquake first, the armour is reduced by 4. Then the Demolish comes in and destroys the fortification.

As for the other question, check p. 14 of the walkthrough. Even if the effect is not targeted, it still has no effect on a unit with resistance. The Demolish card is special. The first line says "Ignore site fortifications this turn." That still happens because it is affecting the site, not the unit. However, the next line "Enemies get Armor -1", Units with Fire Resistance are immune to this effect.

LEADERSHIP: What "regardless of elements" truly means? If I have a unit with Fire Attack 4, does it ends with Fire Attack 6 or Fire Attack 4 + (Physical) Attack 2? Also, can I add Ranged Attack to a unit which have none?

PRAYER OF WEATHER: How does ir combines with "FLIGHT"? Does the flung over hexes cost 1 and 3 points of movemente instead of 0,2?

I DON'T GIVE A DAMN, WHO NEEDS MAGIC? and UNIVERSAL POWER are not cumulative on the same sideways card, right?

LEADERSHIP: What "regardless of elements" truly means? If I have a unit with Fire Attack 4, does it ends with Fire Attack 6 or Fire Attack 4 + (Physical) Attack 2? Also, can I add Ranged Attack to a unit which have none?

PRAYER OF WEATHER: How does ir combines with "FLIGHT"? Does the flung over hexes cost 1 and 3 points of movemente instead of 0,2?

I DON'T GIVE A DAMN, WHO NEEDS MAGIC? and UNIVERSAL POWER are not cumulative on the same sideways card, right?

Thanks!

Mana Exploit: Yes. It says a colour other than gold, and the icons show this clearly.

Leadership: It is +2 to its Attack, so Fire Attack 4 becomes Fire Attack 6.

Prayer of Weather: Flight still works as printed. The Prayer increases the movement cost of the terrain. Flight ignores the cost of the terrain.

I Don't Give a Damn, Who Needs Mages, Universal Power: Correct. Each skill works seperately. If you play a card sideways for one of them, you then need to play a different card for another one. You can use each of them on your turn, but for different cards.

Can you use a block card even if you aren't blocking the whole attack, the rule book suggests it's pointless, but not that you can't do it...was wondering because of the Ice Shield that drops the armour of an enemy it's used to block if powered up.

Can you use a block card even if you aren't blocking the whole attack, the rule book suggests it's pointless, but not that you can't do it...was wondering because of the Ice Shield that drops the armour of an enemy it's used to block if powered up.

EDIT (Reversal of what I said earlier) Ice Shield will reduce the armour if the block is unsuccessful. This is official from Vlaada.

And.. it is in the rulebook. Page 8. Section 8a. Sometimes a blocking card with have effects other than adding to your block total. Unless stated otherwise, these effects appply whether or not the block was successful.

Hey guys, I need a clarification using the Unit Utem Guardsmen. When is the swift abilty canceled, before the unit blocks or after the block?Can they block with Block 4 succesful an enemy with attack 3 (swift)?Thx

Hey guys, I need a clarification using the Unit Utem Guardsmen. When is the swift abilty canceled, before the unit blocks or after the block?Can they block with Block 4 succesful an enemy with attack 3 (swift)?Thx

question, i don't know the specific names, but there is a spell that says "destroy the target enemy" and one other that says "destroy the target enemy token"is there any difference?also if i start a combat i can cast the spell at the very beginning (before ranged combat) and destroy the enemy, right?

EDIT: ok, they are both misprints and as stated in the rulebook errata can be only played in the attack phase of combat.

but aside the word "token" they are the same and do the same thing? (apart that disintegrate also gives -1 to enemies armor which i see useful only if you are fighting against multiple targets)

I don't know if this has been brought up yet or not but there's an issue with both cards.

The rulebook says on p9 " End of turn 7b " that any keep you own as well as the day tactic card "Planning" can increase your HAND LIMIT.

However, the day tactic card nor the keep explanation card ever mentions Hand Limit. Those cards say " draw up to your hand size, then draw an additional card ... " which is a different thing entirelyand something I did abuse in my first game.I had 6+wounds in my hand but didn't really care as I had two keeps ( adjacent to one ) and the Planning Tactic.So, no matter how many wounds I got in hand, I drew 3 cards anyway.

On both cards " draw an extra card" should probably be replaced by " increases your hand limit by one" ?

I don't know if this has been brought up yet or not but there's an issue with both cards.

The rulebook says on p9 " End of turn 7b " that any keep you own as well as the day tactic card "Planning" can increase your HAND LIMIT.

However, the day tactic card nor the keep explanation card ever mentions Hand Limit. Those cards say " draw up to your hand size, then draw an additional card ... " which is a different thing entirelyand something I did abuse in my first game.I had 6+wounds in my hand but didn't really care as I had two keeps ( adjacent to one ) and the Planning Tactic.So, no matter how many wounds I got in hand, I drew 3 cards anyway.

On both cards " draw an extra card" should probably be replaced by " increases your hand limit by one" ?

I don't know if this has been brought up yet or not but there's an issue with both cards.

The rulebook says on p9 " End of turn 7b " that any keep you own as well as the day tactic card "Planning" can increase your HAND LIMIT.

However, the day tactic card nor the keep explanation card ever mentions Hand Limit. Those cards say " draw up to your hand size, then draw an additional card ... " which is a different thing entirelyand something I did abuse in my first game.I had 6+wounds in my hand but didn't really care as I had two keeps ( adjacent to one ) and the Planning Tactic.So, no matter how many wounds I got in hand, I drew 3 cards anyway.

On both cards " draw an extra card" should probably be replaced by " increases your hand limit by one" ?

There is an Advanced Action (I don't remember the name I have to check that at home) which gives you back all crystals used during a turn as its second effect. Does it gives you back a crystal which was used for the card itself or crystals used for card which were played before it ?

Second question.

The enemy tokens on the city dials for the non-white cities feature a color I assumed to be red. Now I have seen the picture of your self-made reference cards, there are no dragons in cities, but they all feature violet enemies, is this correct ?

Two questions about border cases of the rules arose in my recent plays:

When I play Maximal Effect with a red mana and an attack action card and it allows me to "Use the advanced effect of that card two times", can I use those two uses for separate attacks (for example, when I fight two enemies and one of them has physical resistance)?

When I use the spell Call to Arms with the Utem Swordsmen (I think - I mean the ones that are damaged when they block or attack 6), can I choose to use the stronger effect because this technically isn't "assigning damage"?