You wrote: Anyway, I think Will and I have just improved the New Mantra.Let's adapt the New Mantra to fit the specific occasion. It is adaptable for the simple reason that "a country of our own" truly is the solution to everything. So that part of the mantra (the introductory clause) would always remain the same -- whereas the second clause could be changed to fit the occasion, as you suggest. Hence:

If we White people had a country of our own, the right to keep and bear arms would be sacred and safe.
---

National-Socialist Germany had its own country where only Germans could own firearms. It was a sound, preservationist policy because only Germans could be citizens. Jews couldn't own guns, nor could others on German soil, whether subjects or guests. See Dr. Pierce's book on the subject:

Germans' right to own weapons was only "safe" until the Allies vanquished Germany and disarmed her citizens, even of bladed weapons. Don't fall for the lying Jew's widespread mantra on the subject:

Imagine a large, homogeneous section of the U.S where only loyal Whites could be citizens, could vote, serve on juries and own firearms, etc. No Negroes or mestizos or Jews or other non-Whites -- everyone who can't make White babies -- would have the rights of White Americans in this new nation.

Someone here mentioned VNN (VanguardNewsNetwork). I just saw where the pros and cons of the Anti-Racist Hitler video and the Mantra are being discussed: Anti-racist Hitler - Vanguard News Network Forum There's none of the tedious bullying there by clowns, demanding that critics of Bugsterism agree with them or else they'll be called anti-racists or liars, or stupid, or whatever.

I'm curious. What's the Bugster comeback to questions like these that are repeated over and over under penalty of being called a Nazi Holocaust denier if your replies are not deemed satisfactory to your inquisator:

Are you a Nazi?

Are you a Holocaust denier?

You'd better have more than a mantra to explain why you're neither, or else...

__________________

We need ethics; we need values and standards; we need a world view. And if one wants to call all of these things together a religion, then we need a religion. One might choose instead, however, to call them a philosophy of life. Whatever we call it, it must come from our own race soul: it must be an expression of the innate Aryan nature. And it must be conducive to our mission of racial progress. -Dr. William Pierce, in NATIONAL ALLIANCE MEMBERSHIP HANDBOOKwww.natall.com

Last edited by Will Williams; 05-09-2013 at 09:32 AM.
Reason: removed repeated word for clarity

You can't even answer a simple question which illustrates the truth about you:

Is it more important to save our race or be anti-Semitic?

Define Semitism. Save our race from what?

What are your replies, please, when this question you pose is answered with questions of clarification? Do you simply keep demanding of the person you want to enlighten that he answer your either/or question?

I'm curious. What's the Bugster comeback to questions like these that are repeated over and over under penalty of being called a Nazi Holocaust denier if your replies are not deemed satisfactory to your inquisator:

Are you a Nazi?

Are you a Holocaust denier?

You'd better have more than a mantra to explain why you're neither, or else...

No experienced BUGser would go on the defensive and explain.

When we engage an Anti-White we are not trying to convince or win
over the Anti-White instead we are aiming to make a point to those
White people who observe the exchange.
Our point is White Genocide and those who support it are Anti-White

By trying to 'explain why you're neither' you are effectively granting control
of the situation to the Anti-White.
It's what we call 'tailgating' where you follow the Anti-White instead of
dominating the exchange.

In the example you gave I would simply respond over and over until the Anti-White gives up.
"Are you Anti-White ?"
"Are you denying White Genocide ?"

It's not 'refined', it's not 'gentlemanly' but it is effective.

Of course one can always steal the Anti-Whites thunder at the start of exchange by saying, "What's next, are you going to call me a 'naziwhowantstokill6millionjews' ?"

You'd better have more than a mantra to explain why you're neither, or else...

The Mantra is all that's needed.

Quote:

Anti-white: "Are you a Nazi?"

Pro-White: "Would you support flooding Asian countries with millions and millions of non-Asians, and forcing Asians by law to integrate with the non-Asians so as to "assimilate," i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence, and then would you ask any Asian who protests that genocide of his people, 'Are you a Nazi?'

No, because you only support genocide for Whites!

You say you're anti-racist, but what you are is anti-White!

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white!

It's very simple, Will. (It took me many months to learn to do it though. Old habits die hard)

For the second question, just substitute "Holocaust denier" for "Nazi" in the above.

Yes the Mantra is like taking a sledge hammer along to the local debating society. It's not pretty, but keep on bashing away with it and you will always come out on top.

That seems a pretty good characterization of the impression that BUGSters make. You are boors who are averse to real discussion.

As to whether you always come out on top, that is doubtful. You can pretend that you always come out on top, because when somebody shows a flaw in your position, you pay no mind. Like a soldier continuing to charge forward after his head has been blown off, you keep going.

Sheer brass and persistence might enable you to appear to "come out on top" to some people.

That seems a pretty good characterization of the impression that BUGSters make. You are boors who are averse to real discussion.

As to whether you always come out on top, that is doubtful. You can pretend that you always come out on top, because when somebody shows a flaw in your position, you pay no mind. Like a soldier continuing to charge forward after his head has been blown off, you keep going.

Sheer brass and persistence might enable you to appear to "come out on top" to some people.

Anti-Whites had decades to enter into 'real discussion'
Instead Anti-Whites just screamed the r-word

Anti-Whites don't care about 'real discussion'

Anyway, what do you care whether our approach is 'flawed' ?
You can't even affirm your goal is to secure the existence of our people
and a future for White children

Anybody who refuses to affirm the 14 Words has no right to critique pro-
White activities in the fight against White Genocide