MPAA May Like Donuts, but They Shouldn’t Be the (Copyright) Police

The companies and organizations that run the Internet’s domain name system shouldn’t be in the business of policing the contents of websites, or enforcing laws that can impinge on free speech. The staff of ICANN, the organization that oversees that system, agrees. That’s why it’s not surprising that the Motion Picture Association of America, which has consistently sought power to edit the Internet, is now bypassing ICANN and making private deals with domain name registries.

The company Donuts controls about 200 new top-level domains, including .movie, .theater, and .media. Yesterday, MPAA announced that it has made a deal with Donuts that will make MPAA a “trusted notifier” for reporting copyright-infringing websites, with the expectation that Donuts will disable or suspend those websites’ domain names. According to the website TorrentFreak, this will make MPAA “the definitive authority on what is considered a large-scale piracy website.” This raises the risk of a website losing its domain name, or having it co-opted, without a court judgment or other legal process.

The agreement has some limitations. Donuts isn’t committing itself to suspend every domain name MPAA wants gone. According to the announcement, Donuts will “work with registrar partners to contact the website operator and seek additional evidence” before deciding whether to take a website’s name away. But Donuts may have business reasons for bowing to MPAA’s demands, such as encouraging the major studios that make up MPAA to buy lucrative domains in the .movie space.

The agreement only applies to a group of new top-level domains that are not in wide use yet—it doesn’t apply to the more common .com, .net, or .org domains, or to country-specific domains like .uk. Other domain name registries can distinguish themselves in the market by protecting their customers against censorship—and many do.

The danger in agreements like this is that they could become a blanket policy that Internet users cannot avoid. If what’s past is prologue, expect to see MPAA and other groups of powerful media companies touting the Donuts agreement as a new norm, and using it to push ICANN and governments towards making all domain name registries disable access to an entire website on a mere accusation of infringement. We’ve seen a similar dynamic with sites that host user-generated content: having convinced YouTube and Facebook to impose rigid and abuse-prone automatic copyright filters, major entertainment companies are now trying to make those filters mandatory for every site, leaving users no real options. And MPAA’s president, former Senator Christopher Dodd, has said that he wants “voluntary agreements” like these to be turned into legislation.

Other business interests, as well as governments, who want to suppress particular types of speech on the Internet will jump on this bandwagon. The World Trademark Review blog reported that after the Donuts agreement, “[t]he door . . . appears to be open” for similar agreements aimed at other “illegal activity.” On the global Internet, a so-called “illegal” website could be one that contains blasphemy, “hate speech,” criticism of government officials, or photographs of a woman's uncovered legs or arms. And if domain registries in a global market give U.S. movie studios the power to declare which websites are “illegal,” it will be harder for them to resist market pressure and legal threats from other corporations and governments who seek the same power.

Taking away a website’s domain name means interrupting all of the speech that takes place on that site. It creates a much greater danger of censorship than suppressing individual pages or files. And the domain name system only works so long as most Internet users trust it to direct them to the websites they ask for, not only those that politically connected companies and repressive governments want them to see. That’s why domain registries and registrars shouldn’t take part in policing the contents of websites and services. And that’s why we’ll continue to fight the website-blocking power grab.

When Diego Gomez, a biology master’s student at the University of Quindio in Colombia, shared a colleague’s thesis with other scientists over the Internet, he was doing what any other science grad student would do: sharing research he found useful so others could benefit from it and...

While there are countless examples of DMCA abuse, sometimes a story stands out. Last week, Samsung sent a series of takedown notices aimed at videos showing a GTA V mod in action. The modification replaced an in-game weapon with an exploding Samsung phone. Whether you think...

Months of aggressive lobbying by the MPAA and its allies at the Copyright Office gave them the result they desired Update: a timeline of events based on the Copyright Office e-mails is here. In the current debate over cable set-top box competition, content and cable industries worked together to...

Google v Equustek involves a legal challenge to an extraterritorial order from a Canadian court. EFF intervened in the case after a trial court ruled in June that Google must remove links to full websites that contained pages selling a product that allegedly infringed trade secret rights. The injunction not...

It's Time for the Supreme Court to End the Venue Loophole As we’ve detailed on many occasions, forum shopping is rampant in patent litigation. Last year, almost 45% of all patent cases were heard in the Eastern District of Texas, a sparsely populated region of Texas probably more...

A major distributed-denial-of-service (DDoS) attack on cybersecurity blog Krebs on Security reminded technology users that faulty Internet of Things (IOT) security makes all of our devices and appliance vulnerable. But some manufacturers may not be willing to spend money to make their appliances more secure, said Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF...

After months of study, European regulators have finally released the full and final proposal on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, and unfortunately it's full of ideas that will hurt users and the platforms on which they rely, in Europe and around the world. We've already written a fair bit...

After eighteen years, we may finally see real reform to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s unconstitutional pro-DRM provisions. But we need your help. In enacting the “anti-circumvention” provisions of the DMCA, Congress ostensibly intended to stop copyright “pirates” from defeating DRM and other content access or copy restrictions...