Yugi Moto wrote:Oh, shipping is where you take two characters from a T.V. show, who aren't romantically involved in any shape or form, and then you force them to become a lesbian couple by drawing vivid and gratuitous fan art of them for about six months, before you move on to some other show. Lather, rinse, repeat.

1. Should Â§3 be changed to: "Â§3: Any member of the CCP will help the First Impression Thread to get 30000 replies."?a) Yes, we shall change it! Callid (2); Yurikochan (1) 3b) No, it's fine like it is.Conia (2)2Finished; [i]ended 11.10.2010 at 00:45 CET..2. Should a Â§4.1 be added with the following wording: "Â§4.1: To ensure general comfortableness, cosiness and snugness, Parkur is banned from posting in the First Impression thread."?a) Yes, we need that! Callid (2) 2b) Nope, that's bullshit.Conia (2)2Cancelled by VETO from Callid..3. Should a Â§4.1 be added with the following wording: "Â§4.1: Disrupting the general peace of the First Impression Thread or trying to lead other people to disrupt it (flamebait) may also be punished according to Â§1-1.2."?a) Yes, we shall add it! Callid (2); Detective Tommy (1); Conia (2) 5b) No, we're fine without it. 0Finished; [i]ended 14.10.2010 at 21:31 CET..4. Should Â§7.1 be changed to: "Â§7.1: A vote can only be called by a leader or member, and only in the "First Impression"-topic."?a) Yes, we shall change it! Callid (2); Detective Tommy (1); Conia (2) 5b) No, it's fine the way it is. 0Finished; [i]ended 14.10.2010 at 21:31 CET..5. Should Â§7.8 be changed to: "Â§7.8: A VETO has to be cast in the 768 hours following the starting of the petition/action."?a) Yes, we shall change it this way! 0b) Yes, we shall change it, but 768 hours (32 days) are ridiculous, 384 (16 days) are better. Callid (2); Conia (2) 4c) No, we shouldn't change that, but those ridiculous 720 hours (30 days) should be replaced by 336 hours (14 days). 0d) No, it's fine the way it is. 0Finished; [i]ended 14.10.2010 at 21:31 CET..6. Should a Â§7.9 be added with the following wording: "Â§7.9: After an option has been taken, it takes effect immediately, unless specified otherwise; no matter if it isn't reflected in the CCP immediately and/or undone by a VETO later."?a) Yes, we shall add it! Callid (2); Conia (2) 4b) No, we're fine without it. Detective Tommy (1) 1Finished; [i]ended 14.10.2010 at 21:31 CET..7. Should a Â§7.10 be added with the following wording: "Â§7.10: An petition may not be cancelled in any other way than by a VETO of a leader (which would stop any change anyway), not even by the one who originally started the petition."?a) Yes, we shall add it! Callid (2) 2b) No, we're fine without it. Detective Tommy (1); Conia (2) 3Finished; [i]ended 14.10.2010 at 21:31 CET..8. Should a Â§9.7 be added with the following wording: "Â§9.7: An assistance might at any time choose to cease being an assistance, similar to Â§6."?a) Yes, we shall add it! Callid (2); Detective Tommy (1); Conia (2) 5b) No, we're fine without it. 0Finished; [i]ended 14.10.2010 at 21:31 CET..9. Should Â§3 be changed to: "Â§3: Any member of the CCP will help the First Impression Thread to have twice as many replies (and pages) than the Sad East Kingdom Thread."?a) Yes, we shall change it!Callid (2); nomemory (1); KainTheVampire (1); Conia (2); Yurikochan (1)7b) No, it's fine like it is. 0Finished; [i]ended 05.11.2010 at 12:05 CET..10. Should the paragraphs Â§10-10.9 (see below) be added to the CCP?

Â§10-10.9 wrote:Â§10: A leader may leave the CCP or step back from being a leader (and begin being a member) whenever the CCP has two leaders. If the following paragraphs conflict with other paragraphs, the other paragraphs are overruled.Â§10.1: If a member for any reason ceases to be a leader of the CCP or a member of the DCTP forums, he should, if possible, appoint a successor (he may also do this in advance). Said successor has to be a member of the CCP.Â§10.2: The successor becomes a leader (and ceases to be a member) at the same time the old leader ceases to be leader of the CCP or member of the DCTP forums. He is in no way inferior to the other leader, an the former leader in no way retains any special rights.Â§10.3: If a leader leaves without naming a successor, a nomination phase immediately starts, which will last 24 hours, plus additional 12 hours for every member of the CCP, in which any member may nominate any member as a new candidate, except himself.Â§10.4: At any time between his nomination and the appointing of the new leader, any candidate or member may for any reason choose to cease being a candidate and/or proclaim himself unnominateable.Â§10.5: After the nomination phase, the election phase starts, lasting exactly 96 hours, in which any member may vote for any candidate (including himself). Each member has exactly one vote, which may not be split.Â§10.6: After the end of the election phase, the candidate with the most votes immediately becomes a leader of the CCP and ceases to be a member of the CCP.Â§10.7: If there is a draw between two or more candidates, the leader decides which of the draw candidates becomes the new leader. If thi is for any reason not done in the next 48 hours, the draw candidate that became a member (or leader) of the CCP first is granted the vacant leader position, similarly to Â§10.6.Â§10.8: During any time in which the CCP has only one leader, no petition may be started, and no member may be fired or admitted. Any ongoing petition is postponed until the CCP has again two leaders, after which it won't end for 48 hours. Â§10.9: Similarly, a VETO may be cast on one of these ongoing petitions in the 384 hours following the institution of the second leader. The new leader can, however, not VETO any finished petition or action that finished more than 96 hours before the last former leader ceased being a leader.

a) Yes, we need them! Callid (2), KainTheVampire (1) 3b) No, we're fine without them.Conia (2) 2Finished; [i]ended 10.12.2010 at 12:16 CET..11. Should a Â§5.4 be added with the following wording: "Â§5.4: Similarly, the account of any member of the CCP may never be deleted as long as that person stays a member of the CCP."?a) Yes, we need that! Save nom! Callid (2), Conia (2), Yurikochan (1)5b) No, get rid of her. 0Finished; [i]ended 28.12.2010 at 02:00 CET..12. Should "Â§3: Any member of the CCP will help the First Impression Thread to have twice as many replies (and pages) than the Sad East Kingdom Thread" [be exchanged] for "Â§3 Any member of the CCP will help the First Impression Thread to have more replies than the Forum Games Child Board."?a) Yes, we can make it! Conia (2), Yurikochan (1), Kain (1) 4b) No, it is impossible to surpass an entire Child Board. 0VETOed by Callid; [i]16.01.2011 at 01:40 CET..13. Should a Â§4.2 be added with the following wording: "Â§4.2: CCP members cannot treat badly other CCP members if they're gently asked to stop."?a) Yes. Conia (2), Yurikochan (1), Kain (1) 4b) No. Callid (2) 2Finished; [i]ended 18.01.2011 at 00:21 CET..14. How should the Â§3 be worded in the future?a) "Â§3: Any member of the CCP will help the First Impression Thread to have more replies than the General Discussion Board." Callid (2); Conia (2) 4b) "Â§3: Any member of the CCP will help the First Impression Thread to have more replies than the Forum Games Child Board." 0c) Just like it is. 0Finished; [i]ended 18.01.2011 at 01:50 CET..15. Should a Â§10.10 and Â§10.11 be added with the following wording: "Â§10.10: A leader may also name a temporary stand-in if, for whatever reason, he won't access (or be able to access) the forums for some time. If he doesn't name one before he leaves, a stand-in is elected by the procedure described in Â§10.3-10.7." and "Â§10.11: A leader stand-in has all the rights of a leader, and is in no way inferior to the other leader. However, the absent leader remains a leader, and upon his return, the stand-in immediately loses his leader status."?a) Yes, we shall add it! Callid (2);2b) No, that's utter non-sense.Yurikochan (1) 1Finished; [i]ended 08.02.2011 at 13:00 CET..16. Should the CCP rules be changed to Version 3.0 as described in this post?a) Yes, CCP 3.0 FTW!Callid (2); Conia (2); Yurikochan (1); Kain (1)6b) No, I like the old one better. 0Finished; [i]ended 09.05.2011 at 22:05 CET..17. Should Aokochan become the 9th member of the CCP?a) Yes, she should become a member! Callid (2); KaitoLady (1); Conia (2); miakakiri (1); Yuriko (1) 7b) No, she should not be admitted to the CCP. 0Finished; [i]ended 16.06.2012 at 23:51 CEST..

Last edited by Callid on June 16th, 2012, 8:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Yugi Moto wrote:Oh, shipping is where you take two characters from a T.V. show, who aren't romantically involved in any shape or form, and then you force them to become a lesbian couple by drawing vivid and gratuitous fan art of them for about six months, before you move on to some other show. Lather, rinse, repeat.