Arrius Piso Created Christianity

Subtitle

Hello, this site is here to help educate people to a) the true nature of ancient history, and b) to the true beginnings of Christianity. The only way that it was possible for Christianity to have been created by Arrius Calpurnius Piso and his family was for a closed or controlled environment to have existed in the first place. That means that royalty was in control of all that was written for public consumption. There was no freedom of speech, only the illusion of it. The state in which this happened within the Roman Empire is known as an oligarchy.

The Beginnings Of Christianity And The
Evolution Of The Popes

(Roman Piso, 01-17-2014. Expanded,
01-26-2014)

To be perfectly truthful with you, when
I was deciding what title to give this article, so many things were
going through my mind about the papacy and its various periods. And I
began to wonder how it could be that I could possibly put some
representative information in this article from each and still keep
this only an article and not a book. I still don't know, except that
I know I will simply not be able to cover it all here.

The beginnings, of course, started with
those who first created Christianity. And that means, Arrius Piso and
Pliny The Younger, as well as their immediate family. At first there
was Arrius Piso, as the 'papa' or father of the religion itself (see
Abelard Reuchlin's 'The True Authorship of the New Testament').
However, instead of the first bishops of Rome calling themselves
'Pope' or papa, they simply allowed that tradition dictates that the
bishop of Rome was the main leader for the religion. The first bishop
of Rome to publicly call himself 'papa' or Pope as a title (other
than Arrius Piso), was Damscus I, Pope from 366 to 384 C.E.

It should be noted that even though
Arrius Piso was the main author and creator of Christianity, the
manuscripts that he used as its basis were the result of a Roman
effort to create a new religion that was instituted during the reign
of Tiberius. The place where this council or committee for the
creation of a new “universal” (that is, actually what “Catholic”
means) religion was named or renamed after Tiberius, as Tiberias,
which was located in Galilee. The people involved in that project
were ancestors of Arrius Calpurnius Piso. Seneca was one member. He
was Arrius Piso's grand uncle (his maternal grandmother's brother).
There were several others, including Arrius Piso's father, Gaius
Piso. By the time of Nero, the Julian Caesars had abandoned the idea
of making a new religion. Thus, Nero did not approve of it, and the
Pisos and their allies then planned to assassinate Nero. He found
out, and had many of those conspirators executed (such as Seneca,
Gaius Piso, and Lucan The Poet, who was Seneca's nephew). Though
Lucius Piso, Gaius Piso's brother, and Arrius Piso, were involved,
Lucius Piso and Arrius Piso are spared by Nero. Professor Bruno Bauer
of the University of Berlin, wrote 'Christ and the Caesars', which
was published in 1877. His work gives evidence of the Roman creation
of Christianity, including Seneca's involvement in it. This early
council had created a manuscript called 'Ur Marcus', and probably
another known as 'Ur Mattheus', or the prototype manuscripts for the
gospels of Mark and Matthew. Though actual copies or even portions of
these have never been found, they are known in classical and biblical
scholarship as the 'Q' or Quella document/s.

The family that created Christianity,
did not trust those who were not part of the immediate family to lead
Christianity; therefore, all of the early popes were represented by
the immediate family members who could be trusted. Sometimes, they
were only leaders in name only, just to fill a space in the
chronology. Such as with Julius Calpurnius Piso. He was Arrius Piso's
son, but he did not approve of Christianity. However, he went along
with it because of a deal he had made with his father to allow him to
write the ending - not only to the story of Christianity, but to
Christianity itself; that being The Revelation. By the way, several
people have wondered how it is that we have come to know so much
about Arrius Piso and his family, as well as Pliny The Younger.
Credit the fact that so many primary source documents have survived,
and the work which was done by Professor Ronald Syme. Syme wrote many
extremely important papers on ancient Roman history and the
individuals who lived then. His most important work came in the form
of articles that he wrote which were published in The Journal Of
Roman Studies, or JRS. He also wrote books, such as his well-known
'Roman Papers'. Though Syme never wrote openly about what he actually
knew about Arrius Piso and Pliny The Younger, he wrote things that
indicated that he was an Inner Circle member; meaning that he knew
that they had created Christianity.

The very early popes or bishops of Rome
were named after names which could identify who they were (to the
Inner Circle of royals of the time), but without revealing who they
were to the public, in general. They gave hints and clues about who
they were, without being too specific. They gave just enough
information so that those in the know could discover just who they
were. For one thing, those who knew who the creator of Christianity
was, they would know automatically, that this person would be the
very first bishop of Rome – St. Peter (aka Arrius Calpurnius Piso).
Besides popes, saints and martyrs too, were actually created from
within the family, their relatives and descendants.*

As time went on, the family branched
out and formed various dynasties (such as the Annii Verii, the Annii
Anicii, the Ulpii, etc.). There was a tradition, still in place among
royals, from before Christianity was created, where they would hold
councils and committees to make decisions about various things. These
were times when representatives of the various branches came together
to decide who would be pope. Long before Christianity was created,
there was a tradition where the king's first son would be in line to
replace him when the time came, and the second son, would be the
leader of the religion and would be known by different names when it
came to different religions; but basically, acting in the same way as
a High Priest (a practice seen used by the Pharaohs, for instance).

During the time when Emperors were
ruling the Roman Empire, those emperors were descendants of Arrius
Piso (see my list of the Roman Emperors and their family descent &/or
relationship to Arrius Piso). And they, basically, chose the popes
from within their own family or close relatives. When they created
the illusion of the Roman Empire falling (it actually just moved to
the East for a time, i.e. Constantinople), other branches of the
family emerged on the scene. These were known in history as the
Lombards, Visigoths, etc. They were closely related to the leaders of
the Franks, who would become known as the Merovingian Kings of
France. These leaders, could all trace back their ancestry to Arrius
Piso. And of course, this included the Byzantine/Macedonian rulers
who were later to become known as the Paleologian rulers.

So, down through time, when it came to
choosing a pope and someone to replace or succeed him, the various
branches of the family would decide by committee. At times, to save
time, certain dynastic houses were chosen to make such choices. One
of those later houses was known as Welf. Welf means 'papal'. The
Welfs, as known in history, were the leaders and rulers of Bavaria
and associated lands. But many times the Welfs would allow various
rulers to make these choices and simply approved them before the
other royals of the time. It appears that at least at times, some of
the popes were chosen because they were a) of the right family
(meaning a family that consisted of authors), and/or b) they either
had become terminally ill, or were of such extreme age that it was
assured that they would not be Pope for long. Unlike the emperors,
many of the popes seem to have died of natural causes; except those
that were both pope and emperor (see Abelard Reuchlin's 'From Ulpian
to Constantine').

Gradually, the power to make and bestow
papal powers and authority was given up by the Welfs. This, for the
most part was accomplished by intermarriages with the Welfs. Powerful
branches of these families wanted their family members to rule as
Pope. To show their relationship to each other as Pope and thereby
show their authority to rule the papacy, they gave a family moniker
or name such as 'Orsini', 'Crescentii', 'Sforza', 'Medici' and so
forth. Once these families came to possess the papal powers, they
seldom wanted that power to leave their family; as this was another
means to gain vast wealth as well as power. And these families, would
make saints of their close family members to give the illusion that
they were 'holy', god-fearing people.

But, many times, the power simply went
to their heads and they could not contain themselves or hide what
they were actually doing, nor did they actually care to – because,
who in their own time, could or would do anything about it? One of
the worst of these “papal families” was the Borgias. Many people
today can and have read about the Borgias and their lusts and
depravity, and abuse of power. Remember, that while all of this was
going on, down through history, all of these people and the rulers as
well, were absolutely knowledgeable about their origins and the truth
about Christianity. They were only making use of the institution, the
religion, for their own gain. And, continued to hide just who they
were, their relationship to each other; and of course, their descent
from Arrius Piso.

Rulers who continued to rule as kings
and popes were made from within, with no outsiders ever allowed into
the Inner-Circle. And then came Napoleon. The Holy Roman Empire was
founded by the sons and grandsons of the emperor Charlemagne and
lasted, unchallenged, until the time of Napoleon. It was Napoleon who
changed it all. He could not have brought down the Holy Roman Empire
unless he knew just how to do it. And he did know this because he
too, was a descendant of Arrius Calpurnius Piso. The Inner-Circle
knew Napoleon for who he was, but those who read only the outer world
history of Napoleon did not. Napoleon was a nephew of popes and
descendant of kings himself (including Constantine I and
Charlemagne). But he was very much like his fore bearer Julius
Calpurnius Piso, the son of Arrius Piso who wrote The Revelation as a
way of giving out information about his father creating Christianity.
This is chronicled in my book 'The Inner Circle In The Outer World'.

For those of you who were not aware of
it, the Holy Roman Empire was also known as The Reich. Even though
Napoleon had destroyed the Holy Roman Empire and gotten rid of many
of the royal houses and kings, many more still existed and the
Catholic Church was not destroyed. So, many rulers who were still
kings and the Catholic Church still wanted to get back the power that
they once had and they tried to revive 'The Reich' a second time
beginning in 1871. Before that attempt had ended, it had become World
War I, and ended in 1918. But that “war to end all wars” did not
put an end to an attempt to revive The Reich. Hitler came into power
and established the 'Third Reich'. Which, for those in the know,
realized was actually a revival of the Holy Roman Empire that
Napoleon had crushed. You should be able to find this out by a
thorough reading of a) The Holy Roman Empire, and b) the beginnings
and causes of World Wars I and II.

In more modern times, the actual
origins and family ancestry of popes were being kept more and more
confidential and generally, not given out to the public. Now, you are
given very sketchy and vague ancestral information going back only a
few generations. This is so that you will not discover any
connections to royalty or other popes, and to further hide the fact
that they too, were descendants of the creator of Christianity,
Arrius Piso. Today, the last few popes, though through tradition were
descendants of Arrius Piso, may not have actually known this
themselves. That is, the popes of today, may very well be true
believers of Christianity themselves. And that is basically how the
papacy has changed since its very beginnings.

* Since the story of Christianity or
the Christian story within the gospels were back-dated to an earlier
time, it was also necessary to back-date the bishops of Rome to an
earlier time than they had actually been in, at least until the point
where they could be represented within the time in which they
actually lived and were able to assume the title. This had been
remedied by the time that the Roman Emperor, Antoninus Pius, became
bishop of Rome as Pius I (140-154 CE). Also, I had worked out very
precisely and in great detail, just who all of the early popes were.
But that information was destroyed and I will have to work to restore
as much of that information as possible. The first two were Arrius
Piso as St. Peter, and Pliny The Younger as St. Paul, aka 'Linus'.
The next few were Arrius Piso's sons and grandsons. See Abelard
Reuchlin's 'The True Authorship of the New Testament'.

In at least a couple of my books,
and/or articles or essays, I had made mention that Pliny The Younger
had went around the Roman Empire beginning about the year 98 CE. What
he was doing was converting certain of the altars (small Temples) and
worship places for the old Roman gods & goddesses, into the first
Christian Churches. Abelard Reuchlin also says this in his 'The True
Authorship of the New Testament'. However, since at that time, the
New Testament had not yet been completed, the early believers were
somewhat skeptical. There was no early Church history written about
yet either. So, it seemed to early prospects to have come out of
nowhere. These were problems that still had to be worked out. The
Jews too (consisting at that time of only Pharisees and their
Scribes), were still around and they knew the truth about
Christianity – some of which, appear to have been informing some of
the early believers. In any case, initially, Christianity was a flop.
Arrius Piso had tried testing it out much earlier, in certain
communities where his family had property and land holdings. An
example of this is Herculaneum and Pompeii. Only the gospels Mark and
Matthew were finished by 73-75 CE (Common Era). And Mt Vesuvius
erupted in 79 CE, burying those cities. So, they had to not only
start over, but they had to wait until sometime after the reign of
Domitian – as he had banished the Piso family from Rome, except for
Pliny The Younger (who was Arrius Piso's much younger foster
brother). Domitian kept Arrius Piso, who was still serving in the
military, far off from Rome in Pannonia. We can glean all of this
from the histories of the time, as long as we know under what names
they were listed in those histories, such as in the histories of
Flavius Josephus (aka Arrius Piso), Tacitus, Pliny The Younger, and
Suetonius.

One of the main reasons that the Jews
had given up fighting Arrius Piso and his invention, Christianity, as
well as his Emperor relatives, is because they could see that
Christianity at that time, appeared to be going nowhere. And in
truth, Christianity would not become a real and actual religion with
many believers until after the time of Constantine I (c. 330 CE).
Before that, no one was funding the necessary infrastructure, such as
the church buildings, bishops and other clergy. Arrius and Pliny had
thought that they could just convert the old altars and set up a
bishop at each of the first seven 'churches' and that it would take
off; it didn't. They wanted to run it on a shoestring. By the time of
Constantine, the family realized that it was going to take much more
than that to get it going. So, before Constantine (and even during
his time), the Christian Church existed primarily as a fictional
story. But during that time (from Arrius Piso to Constantine),
various of the family members were busy writing as 'Church Fathers'
and others, to make it appear that Christianity HAD indeed existed
and been an active religion for all those years (See Abelard
Reuchlin's 'How Christianity Grew...' The 'popes' prior to
Constantine were popes in name only. The very early churches which
went extinct, did so because once the Piso family realized no one was
attending their churches, they tried to lure them in with sex. They
started to write sexualized or bawdy material (thinly disguised),
having Pliny as Paul do most of it with his epistles (see my book
'Piso Christ'). After getting church attendees “hot and bothered”,
they would direct them to small sex rooms built into those early
churches, where they had a choice of “helper” and were asked for
a tithe or “donation”. This was simply a continuation of what
they were already doing in Rome with “vestal virgins”, who were
not virgins at all; but were Temple prostitutes who were play-acting
as if they were inexperienced – because that is what a majority of
their clientèle preferred (Read 'The Rise, Decline, and Fall
of the Roman Religion' by James Ballantyne Hannay).They had been
doing this in even earlier times and would do this again in later
times as well. But once the people of the towns in which these
churches were located realized what was going on there, they forcibly
closed them down (Again, see the works of James Ballantyne Hannay on
Roman Religion).

James Ballantyne Hannay, was a
Professor at Oxford. He was one of the main contributors and
consultants for the great work known as 'The Encyclopedia Biblica'.
He says of it, “For instance, the learned and reverend authors of
the Encyc. Biblica have treated the Jesus miracles of walking on
waters, feeding thousands, etc. as “childish” fables, and have
declared that Peter and Paul were merely “pen” names, or lay
figures on which the true authors of the New Testament, the Roman
ecclesiastics, hung their religious disquisitions – in fact, that
the while narrative is fiction. That was always my opinion. The
artificial sources of the names Peter and Paul are very apparent.”
Hannay is famous for saying; “The Bible is full of passages too
gross for translation, and containing sex words connected with the
Roman religion.” Hannay, too, also wrote about Paul's travels and
of those travels being to places that were known for vice (the sex
trade). Hanny also knew about the archaeological discoveries of
ancient church ruins wherein were found the little “sex rooms”
which were built into those early churches. Lucian, writing at the
time of Marcus Aurelius (circa 180 CE), said that (even) the temple
in Jerusalem had 100 of these “sex cubicles” built into it.
Hannay says of the early Christian churches, “The Christian or
“New” Churches were simply “free trade” brothels like the
“high places” of the O.T., where, however, all prostitutes had
their fees...” (Hannay's 'The Rise, Decline, and Fall...', pg 45).

Note: Further information regarding the
little sex cubicles used within ancient temples and early churches
can be found in Lucian's 'The Syrian Goddess'. The Roman Emperor
Marcus Aurelius wrote as Lucian, circa 180 CE. He was a descendant of
Arrius Piso through his son Justus Piso. By the way, the Piso family
knew a great deal about what to use and what would work in terms of
religion, as their family had experience with it for several hundred
years. One thing about them that has hardly ever mentioned is that
they had a long history as Roman governors of Syria. But they were
also descendants of the ancient kings of Syria as well.