Over the past 10 years, studies of end-of-life care in hospitals and long-term care facilities have described a variety of problems.1,2 So it is not surprising that many patients say that they would prefer to die at home rather than in a hospital.3,4 Indeed, one national study of end-of-life care found that home hospice care produced higher family ratings of care compared with inpatient care.2

However, the landscape of inpatient care is changing rapidly, and many hospitals have created palliative care consulting services and specialized inpatient palliative care units. It is important to determine whether inpatient palliative care offers a high-quality alternative to home hospice care because a death at home is not possible for all patients. For instance, some patients lack adequate family support, and hospice is not available in all areas. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare families' perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care provided by hospice in patients' homes with care provided by palliative care teams in an inpatient setting.

METHODS

Retrospective telephone surveys were conducted with family members using the Family Assessment of Treatment at End-of-life (FATE), a 32-item telephone survey. Families of patients who received inpatient or outpatient care from 1 of 5 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical facilities in the last month of life were eligible to participate.

We examined inpatient and home differences for the overall FATE score and domain scores using the rank sum test, and for single items we used the χ2 test. To adjust for site, we used linear regression models for the overall and domain scores and logistic regression for single dichotomous items.

RESULTS

Interviews were completed with families of 769 patients, of whom 347 (45%) died as inpatients with palliative care and 115 (15%) died at home with hospice care. Patients who died at home with hospice care did not differ from patients who died as inpatients with respect to age, ethnicity, or family relationship (spouse vs child vs other). However, the 2 groups differed with respect to site of death.

COMMENT

Although many patients would prefer to die at home,3,4 families of patients receiving palliative care in inpatient settings perceived care to be at least as good as that of patients who died at home with hospice care. In addition, families perceived patients' overall care to be better. It is possible that some of these patients had greater needs than a typical home hospice program is able to meet. It is also possible that the substantial burdens that families face in caring for home hospice patients5 influence their perceptions of care.

It is important to note that this study was conducted in a VA population, which is atypical of the general US population. Also, VA hospitals are more likely to have palliative care programs compared with other hospitals.6 Nevertheless, these data provide important preliminary evidence that palliative care in an inpatient setting can offer a reasonable alternative to care at home.

Author Contributions: Dr Casarett had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: De Sousa, Smith, Ritchie, Rosenfeld, and Casarett. Acquisition of data: Smith, Bailey, Furman, Ritchie, Rosenfeld, Shreve, and Casarett. Analysis and interpretation of data: De Sousa, Smith, Corcoran, Bailey, Ritchie, Shreve, and Casarett. Drafting of the manuscript: De Sousa, Smith, Corcoran, Bailey, Shreve, and Casarett. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: De Sousa, Smith, Bailey, Furman, Ritchie, Rosenfeld, Shreve, and Casarett. Statistical analysis: Smith and Casarett. Obtained funding: Shreve and Casarett. Administrative, technical, and material support: De Sousa, Ritchie, and Casarett. Study supervision: De Sousa, Smith, Corcoran, Shreve, and Casarett. Clinical Correlation: Bailey.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This material is based on work supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development Service. Dr Corcoran receives support from the Geriatric Academic Career Award (GACA) grant HRSA GACA–K01 HP00084-02 from the Health Resources and Services Administration. Dr Casarett is the recipient of a President's Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers.

Disclaimer: The content of this research letter does not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government.

REFERENCES

Desbiens
NAWu
AWBroste
SK
et al. SUPPORT Investigators, Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment, Pain and satisfaction with pain control in seriously ill hospitalized adults: findings from the SUPPORT research investigations. Crit Care Med 1996;24
(12)
1953- 1961PubMedLink to Article

Figures

Tables

References

Desbiens
NAWu
AWBroste
SK
et al. SUPPORT Investigators, Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment, Pain and satisfaction with pain control in seriously ill hospitalized adults: findings from the SUPPORT research investigations. Crit Care Med 1996;24
(12)
1953- 1961PubMedLink to Article

Correspondence

The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with
the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.

Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Your quiz results:

The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted

For CME Course:
A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes

Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this
CME course.

Instructions

Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.

Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.

* = Required Field

Comment Author(s)* (if multiple authors, separate
names by comma)

Example: John Doe

Affiliation & Institution*

Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.

Return to: Families' Perceptions of Inpatient and Home Hospice Care at End-of-Life

This feature is provided as a courtesy. By using it you agree that that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to the AMA's Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this article will not be shared, sold, traded, exchanged, or rented. Please refer to The JAMA Network's Privacy Policy for additional information.

Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.