I'm a definite taker. I can do basically any time, though the later it is,
the better. I keep an odd schedule...
Thanks,
jen
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Libby Miller wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose a couple of meetings.
>
> 1. one to talk about the possible vocabularies for images and parts of
> images
>
> 2. to decide which vocabularies to use and come up with a sample
> piece of RDF that represents the sort of annotation we want
>
>
> (1) is one of the purposes of the new W3C proposed image description
> list, but obviously we need a quick decision - we need to pick one that
> does what we want, and we have a couple of examples.
>
> (2) is also becoming urgent, as it impacts on everthing else, including
> the UI and getting on with annotating.
>
> Somewhere we might also talk about what things we need to identify
> (images, people, parts of images, places etc), and how we might go about
> it.
>
> Any takers? I can do (almost) any time - any prefered?
>
> Libby
> ==================================
> This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
> Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.
>
> Subscribe Instructions
> To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
> Body: subscribe
>
> Unsubscribe Instructions
> To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
> Body: unsubscribe
>
> Help
> To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
> Body: help
>
==================================
This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.
Subscribe Instructions
To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: subscribe
Unsubscribe Instructions
To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: unsubscribe
Help
To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: help