1: Its not made by Dice and EA always released a Fall Shooter. It was MoH before, now its Viscerals Shooter.
2: So what? its a shitty game instantly?! cause DICE is the only good developer? Visceral heavily assisted BF3 and also made BF3 DLCs
3: You judge a game just by its name?

1: Its not made by Dice and EA always released a Fall Shooter. It was MoH before, now its Viscerals Shooter.
2: So what? its a shitty game instantly?! cause DICE is the only good developer? Visceral heavily assisted BF3 and also made BF3 DLCs
3: You judge a game just by its name?

First off, your response is disrespectful. Not to a Moderator, but to anyone. Second, what he was referring to in point number 2 was that it cannot truly be a Battlefield game if DICE is not the Developer. Medal of Honor: Warfighter wasn't dubbed Battlefield: Warfighter because Danger Close composed the game, not DICE. So by that logic, Hardline should not be labeled as "Battlefield" if DICE is not the lead Developer. Third, point 3 was an emphasis on point 2.

Prepare your laughbox

the Sebstalder is quiet good since it can 3hit kill at any distanc ,but In my opinion i actually thikn the sweeper is better, its got a really really fast firerate that can beat alll those Noobmaticos, Helregall adn shitguns in close quarters , and its also really accurate out to like l;ong range,. overall great allround gun, jsut my 2$ tho

1: Its not made by Dice and EA always released a Fall Shooter. It was MoH before, now its Viscerals Shooter.
2: So what? its a shitty game instantly?! cause DICE is the only good developer? Visceral heavily assisted BF3BF4 and also made BF3 DLCs
3: You judge a game just by its name?

First off, your response is disrespectful. Not to a Moderator, but to anyone. Second, what he was referring to in point number 2 was that it cannot truly be a Battlefield game if DICE is not the Developer. Medal of Honor: Warfighter wasn't dubbed Battlefield: Warfighter because Danger Close composed the game, not DICE. So by that logic, it should not be labeled as "Battlefield" if DICE is not the lead Developer. Third, point 3 was an emphasis on point 2.

Where was it disrespectful?! Srsly, where?
And my point still stands. Its ridicilous to judge the game by the Title it has...

@JSlice20 Not sure where you found all the disrespect...
COD is still COD even if three different developers work on a new installment every year, why shoulodn't Battlefield be similar? More importantly, why shouldn't it be called Battlefield? From the looks of it it seems fairly similar to the existing Battlefield titles, with vehicles, classes, gadgets and stuff. Just because someone else is in charge of developing it doesn't mean it will be a complete disaster or that it will "ruin" the franchise. (speaking of which, BF3 & 4 changed pretty radically compared to the previous titles, but no one complained about them still being Battlefield games).
In the end though it's still too early to throw around predictions and all, and i agree with @Azaí on that.