Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

We dropped our life and disability insurance a year ago. We probably should have done it years ago but a year ago is when we started really examining and trimming our expenses to semi-ER (just work at home jobs now).

When I Early-Early ER'd, I had an existing term life policy through a professional org. The premiums were low, so I kept it up. But after age 50 they started to move up. By age 55 they were starting to increase rapidly, and the positive tilt increases with increasing age. At that point, did a re-evaluation of what life insurance was supposed to do for us. And as our last child had graduated college, decided it was time to let it lapse.

If you don't have any kids at home or off at college, and your spouse/lover/significant other or whatever won't be destitute if you ring the bell, one would question why it would be needed.

__________________
-- Telly, the D-I-Y guy --
Two fools dancing on the hands of time

I have a couple of very small whole life policies that my father took out on me when I was a child. There is no cost to me anymore since they are on "autopilot" and dividends now pay me. In the end there will be enough to plant me and have a great party.

I don't see any reason to take out another policy even if I didn't have the present one. There will be plenty of savings to take care of my wife with a nice amount left over for the kids (geez I just realized the oldest turns 50 this month ).

We dropped all life insurance (except a small policy that is paid up and earmarked as a burial policy for myself) many years ago (1980 or so). When young LI (Term) is needed since asset base is usually smaller and may be needed for "survivors" but as we age asset base should grow and negate the need for LI (Term) to be used for that purpose (IMO).

I dropped my term life when we had enough savings that my wife could be FI without me. That was some years before I retired.

+1 same with disability insurance. I currently have a whole life policy that I purchased when I was 21. Still paying premiums since they are only ~$20/month and on autopay and the CSV earned 4.75% interest last year so from my perspective I have a highly credit worthy bond that pays me ~4.75% with no interest rate risk and I get free life insurance as a kicker. I consider it part of my fixed income allocation.

BTW, since I bought it the IRR has been 5.19%, ignoring the value of the life insurance. Not my best investment decision, but not my worst either.

Dropped mine about 10 years prior to ER. Even a Financial Advisor/Life Insurance salesperson said it did not make sense. She did say keep the LTD until I stop working.

Once you are FIRE and can retire anytime you want I don't see much sense to disability insurance unless one thinks one is at a much greater risk of becoming disabled than the general population and the DI is inexpensive.

I don't see what working has to do with it other than providing a basis from which to conclude one is disabled.

What is your reason for wanting life insurance? We bought term life insurance when we were young and first bought our house. We only bought enough to cover the cost of the house. As our careers progressed and our salaries increased we dropped life insurance once we knew that each of us alone could cover basic expenses.

When DH retired 3 years ago and I semi-retired we kept some life insurance on him to basically replace his SS until I would be FRA for SS. At the time I was mid-50s so not close to being eligible for even early SS. Over the 3 years we have reduced the coverage periodically as I get closer to SS age. Right now I am still a few years away from retirement SS but only a year away from being to take as a widow. We could have managed without the life insurance but I felt it made a smoother ride.

We are probably going to drop the remaining life insurance within the next couple of months since the current plan if I was a widow would be take survivors benefits (reduced) at age 60 and keep those until I was 70 then take my own (larger) age 70 benefit. So - given that - I don't see much need to keep the life insurance.

The megacorp that I retired from has a free death benefit of a year's final salary life insurance. If I had died shortly after I retired, my beneficiaries would have received a full year of my final megacorp salary. This is a delining balance benefit that will bottom out at 1/2 of my final salary at megacorp. You have to read the fine print in the benefit manual to know that this is available. I have put a marked copy of this in my "if I should drop dead file".

It's nice to know it's there.

__________________Matthew 6:34 (KJV)Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.

We are using our term policies as bridge to SS FRA. Since pensions are our primary source of retirement funds the insurance will give surviving spouse financial flexibility. We didn't choose survivor benefits for either of our pensions, term insurance was a more cost effective way to provide what might be needed.

__________________
JimnJana
"The four most dangerous words in investing are 'This time it's different.'" - Sir John Templeton

Basically agree with others. Prob worth keeping some older universal/whole life policies for their (relatively) safe tax-advantaged increases in cash value. Term LI becomes rather useless once comfortably FI. Only real exception I have heard of is for ultra-high net worth folks using term LI in complex estate planning strategies. IIRC the logic is to help pay estate taxes.

Since there are no real Social Security survivorship options for Dual Income couples, there may be a place for life insurance in this case, especially if there will also be pensions involved that will be decreased upon the death of a spouse.

As my single friends often point out to me, in regards to tax brackets, the costs to maintain a house for one person,instead of two, does not decrease by 50%.

I guess it comes down to that it may depend if your are FI solely with liquid assets or if (so-called) secure income streams are part of your FI status.

Latest Threads

Social Knowledge Community

About Us

This community was started in 2002 as an alternative to a then fee only Motley Fool. The focus of the discussions is on topics related to early retirement and financial independence. The community is moderated to ensure a pleasant experience for our members.