View full sizeMarcos German Domingues of Massachusetts stands with his dogs Sophia, left, and Georg, right, in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, March 27, 2013. The Supreme Court, in the second of back-to-back gay marriage cases, turns Wednesday to a constitutional challenge to the federal law that prevents legally married gay Americans from collecting federal benefits generally available to straight married couples.AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

SAGINAW, MI — The U.S. Supreme Court wrapped up the second day of arguments on gay marriage Wednesday, March 27, with several justices leaning toward striking down the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act.

While justices heard arguments Tuesday, two Michigan congressmen representing each major political party laid out their positions, which are diametrically opposed, on the controversial issue.

Rep. Dave Camp, R-Midland, said he would support new legislation to reinstate the restrictions if the Supreme Court overturns Proposition 8 or DOMA.

"I voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, and I don't have a reason to change now," Camp said. "It is typically decided by the state. We'll have to wait and see. Let them [the Supreme Court] finish their review."

Rep. Dan Kildee, D-Flint Township, said he falls on the complete other side of the issue. Kildee said he hopes the Supreme Court and nation as a whole will "get the job done and move on."

He said an overwhelming majority of young people he speaks with are surprised same-sex marriage is even an issue still being discussed.

"It's really a matter of time," Kildee said. "And whenever it's a matter of time, it occurs to me that the time is now. A right is a right."