Thursday 08/28/14

EPA finds itself fighting a losing public-relations war against not just farm groups but also vocal Republican officials.

Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman on Monday called EPA "the enemy of agriculture."

On Wednesday, U.S. House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, went a little deeper, concluding that EPA maps of rivers and streams "show the EPA's plan to control a huge amount of private property across the country." Smith said EPA was engaging in a land grab.

At issue remains the proposed rule by EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to redefine what "waters of the United States" means in the Clean Water Act.

What does it mean to have land next to a water body of the United States compared to not being adjacent to those waters? That's a big question considering how EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers classify and treat water "tributaries" if this proposed rule goes into effect.

EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed in March to redefine "waters of the United States" under the Clean Water Act. According to the Federal Register posting, the definition used for waters of the United States includes: "Traditional navigable waters; interstate waters, including interstate wetlands; the territorial seas; impoundments of traditional navigable waters, interstate waters, including interstate wetlands, the territorial seas, and tributaries, as defined as such waters; tributaries, as defined, of traditional navigable waters, interstate waters, or the territorial seas; and adjacent waters, including adjacent wetlands."

The next line in the proposed rule posting adds, "Waters in these categories would be jurisdictional 'waters of the United States' by rule -- no additional analysis would be required."

All of the above would be waters of the U.S. under the Clean Water Act.

All perennial, intermittent and ephemeral streams would be part of the rule because they are considered tributaries that are "physically and chemically connected" downstream to traditional navigable waters. That's the case even though intermittent streams only flow part of the year and ephemeral streams only flow after heavy rainfalls.

The map cites the prevalence of intermittent and ephemeral streams across the country that would come under the scope of the rule. Out of 7,339,124 miles of streams across the country, 77%, or nearly 5.7 million miles, are considered either intermittent or ephemeral.

Federal court decisions going back more than a decade have determined that "even tributaries that flow intermittently are waters of the United States." Yet, the rule seems to go farther into ephemeral streams as well.

The rule states that farming, silviculture, ranching and other specified activities would keep their exemptions and not be required to get a permit for those activities.

Beyond the classification of tributaries in the rule, then there is another group of waterways that could be classified as waters of the United States if they are shown to have a "significant nexus." Effectively, the rule seeks to define what a "neighboring riparian area" means, as well as what is a floodplain, a tributary and a significant nexus.

After the attack by Smith and his committee's release of the maps, an EPA official on Thursday wrote a blog seeking to clarify some of the controversy over the maps and what they seem to show.

Tom Reynolds, associate administrator for External Affairs at EPA, explained that the Clean Water Act "has nothing to do with land use or private property rights, and our proposal does not do anything to change that. The idea that EPA can use the Clean Water Act to execute a land grab or intrude on private property rights is simply false."

That's a direct statement, but not exactly accurate. The archives are filled with articles of what landowners are not allowed to do on their land because of wetlands, pond restrictions, trees or drainage where EPA has come in and told farmers they have to stop what they are doing. Then there are the court cases over who needs a discharge permit and why. Every time we write one of these pieces we have to ask why is EPA going after this guy or trying to get some chicken farm to get a permit?

Reynolds goes on. He notes EPA is trying to get out its message about clean water and the role streams and wetlands "to our health, communities and economy. We’ve already worked to ditch many of the myths and misunderstandings in circulation relating to our effort to protect clean water." Following farm groups pushing #DitchtheRule, EPA came up with #DitchtheMyth. http://www2.epa.gov/…

Regarding the maps released by Smith's committee, EPA states the maps were created in 2005 -- that's the George W. Bush administration -- following Supreme Court cases on waters of the U.S. The maps were updated last year with information form the U.S. Geological Survey, but Reynolds states, "Simply put, these maps do not show the scope of waters historically covered under the Clean Water Act or proposed to be covered under EPA’s proposed rule. These maps show generally the location of many streams, wetlands, rivers, lakes and other water bodies. They serve as a tool for visualizing how water flows across our nation and in regions of the country."

Reynolds adds, "EPA has never and is not now relying on maps to determine jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers determines jurisdiction using detailed site specific information in response to requests. That work can be cumbersome and has resulted in lots of on the ground work, but it does not rely on maps. EPA’s proposal will not fully eliminate the need for these efforts, but it can reduce leg work, saving time and money by using science – not maps – to more clearly define the waters that are most important to protect."

That brings up an interesting point. Why aren't there maps to show what EPA or the Corps consider "waters of the United States?" The maps, created in this administration or the last, must have been done to reflect the scope of the Clean Water Act, the Supreme Court decisions and any changes to the proposed law. The maps seem to show a lot of potential ways and places to interpret or designate a regulated waterway of the United States somewhere.

Reynolds states the maps are tools but give a "false impression" of what is considered a waterway "when everyone knows that is clearly not the case."

Still, after staring at those maps for nearly nine years, EPA came out with a rule that seems to classify a lot of different types of water resources as waters of the U.S. Again, pointing to the map, 5.7 million miles of streams are either flow only part of the year or after a heavy rainfall.

Under the rule, these intermittent and ephemeral streams are waters of the U.S. -- no additional analysis would be required.

In its broadest sense, the EPA truly wants to regulate every inch of drainage in the country. Where I live, in water-rich Ohio, virtually every farm has a drainage ditch, creek, wash, or similar tributary. This would enable their long and onerous arm to reach into the farm operations of virtually every farm in my state. I hope Secretary Vilsack has some say in this. If not, virtually all of the drainage in the country will be regulated by the EPA. How glorious would that be? Secretary Vilsack, are you watching this debacle unfold?

Posted by tom vogel at
10:46AM CDT 08/31/14

Tying crop insurance to wetland compliance, new rules from EPA, just coincidence? I think not! The days of property rights, freedom and liberty on our own property are gone along with TRUE private property ownership. Govt agencies and employees running things without oversight or accountability. No trial by a jury of your peers but instead judgement by an activist/govt employee that don't even have to answer to congress. Not much freedom or liberty left. Some day they will combine Memorial Day and Independence Day so we morn the end of our independence. They can't even give us a credible map to say what they have jurisdiction over, that's because they want to protect their right to have jurisdiction over everything.

Posted by Unknown at
10:56AM CDT 08/31/14

Reynolds; "not intrude on private property rights". Are you kidding me?! Why do this "ruling" if that's the case? If its not raining, why carry an umbrella?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 04:17 PM CDTPresident Barack Obama signed off on the temporary bill Friday, but indicated his frustration with Congress over the inability to approve a long-term highway bill. He noted that the lack of a long-term bill makes it hard for governors and mayors to set priorities for roads, bridges, airports and ports.

Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:00 AM CDTA number of agriculture interest groups are among 269 organizations that asked President Barack Obama Wednesday to stop the release of more stringent national ambient air quality standards by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, set for release sometime this year.

Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:35 AM CDTThe White House announced Monday it was launching an initiative highlighting the "American Business Act on Climate Pledge. The effort spotlighted 13 large American companies pushing for action on climate change. The announcement had some emphasis on agriculture, food processing and continued opportunities for landowners to make money through renewable energy, particularly expanded wind production.

Thu Jul 23, 2015 01:44 PM CDTUSDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service is launching a conservation survey of farmers and ranchers to get an idea of what kinds of practices farmers are implementing, according to a news release from USDA.

Wed Jul 22, 2015 02:50 PM CDTEnvironmentalists and others who contend the only way to reduce nutrients runoff into the Gulf of Mexico is through regulation, may not be happy with the release of the final Illinois nutrient loss reduction strategy Tuesday that is a virtual copy of the Iowa strategy hammered on by critics as 'too soft.'

Mon Jul 20, 2015 01:17 PM CDTFor a third-consecutive year a cover crops survey of 1,200 farmers across the country continue to see bumps in corn and soybean yields following the use of cover crops. In addition, the Conservation Technology Information Center Cover Crop Survey recorded an increase in the number of cover crop acres planted nationwide.

Fri Jul 17, 2015 03:08 PM CDTThe Senate Finance Committee on Friday rolled out a package of business tax breaks that the committee will take up on Tuesday. The plan deals with about 50 individual and business taxes that would translate into about $95.6 billion in overall tax breaks for people and companies.

Wed Jul 15, 2015 12:27 PM CDTIn the debate over agricultural market access in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, the European agricultural group Copa-Cogeca has spelled out some conditions its leaders believe need to be met to make the European trade deal a benefit for both sides of the Atlantic.

Mon Jul 13, 2015 11:30 AM CDTI got an email over the weekend from my congressman, an enthusiastic freshman, who is boasting that Congress, as a government agency, has cut its own budget. Other government agencies should do the same.

Thu Jul 9, 2015 01:30 PM CDTA bill that would make significant cuts to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency budget was grounded Thursday, after Republican members objected to an amendment passed by voice vote Tuesday night to ban the Confederate flag at national cemeteries, according to The Hill.

Tue Jul 7, 2015 11:33 AM CDTThe American Farm Bureau Federation sent a letter Monday to every member of the House of Representatives asking lawmakers to "reject any proposals that amend, repeal, defund or otherwise modify or interfere with the Renewable Fuels Standard."

Wed Jul 1, 2015 02:42 PM CDTThe U.S. Agriculture Coalition for Cuba praised the announcement Wednesday by President Barack Obama that the U.S. and Cuba will officially re-establish diplomatic relations on July 20 with the re-opening of respective embassies.

Mon Jun 29, 2015 05:06 PM CDTIt would generally be considered a pretty rare occurrence that the National Cattlemen's Beef Association finds itself in agreement with the group Food & Water Watch. But the two disparate groups nonetheless find themselves equally appalled at USDA for allowing imported beef from northern Argentina and 14 states Brazil known for FMD outbreaks.

Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:59 AM CDTLeaders from the group AGree this week called on Congress to take a top-to-bottom review of agricultural research in the country. AGree's leaders issued a paper breaking down issues surrounding research and development in agriculture and food production. The group AGree was formed to seek consensus among different stakeholders on policy areas important to agriculture.

Wed Jun 24, 2015 02:24 PM CDTSenate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts and his committee's ranking member, Sen. Debbie Stabenow, head into a hearing Thursday clearly divided on the issue of country-of-origin labeling for meat. Roberts is pushing for full repeal of the labels while Stabenow is pitching a voluntary approach to the problem.

Tue Jun 16, 2015 08:44 AM CDTAhead of a scheduled June 25 public hearing in Kansas City, Kansas, on the Renewable Fuel Standard Iowa's Congressional delegation is asking the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to host a public hearing in Iowa.

Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:51 PM CDTThe House Energy and Commerce Committee will weigh in on the debate over biotech labeling laws next week with a hearing over legislation by Rep. Mike Pompeo, a Republican from Kansas.

Wed Jun 10, 2015 09:33 PM CDTThe House voted 300 to 131 to repeal country of origin labels for meat. While the bill now goes to the Senate, the House vote represents a victory for Canadian and Mexican livestock producers.