Re: PCSAT Recovery status

"Why not list the stations heard?"
There should be a "Wall of Shame."
Roger
WA1KAT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga@usna.edu>
To: <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Cc: "'TAPR APRS Mailing List'" <aprssig@tapr.org>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 9:56 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] PCSAT Recovery status
> PCSAT Recovery Status:
>
> Still no joy on recovery.
> Still too many unattended stations overloading the bird while we
> are trying to command it.
>
> I get command on the first ascending pass each day (PCSAT over
> atlantic, out of view of most USA). But next passes are
> impossible. Today, I plotted packet-attempts-by-PCSAT (noise
> bursts by ear) and noticed an astonishing 3 times heavier load
> over the USA compared to over the atlantic. Of these dozens of
> packet attempts, only 2 decoded.
>
> But now that I can tell by ear the huge difference in attempted
> packets by PCSAT when it is over the USA, I can see why we are
> having problems. And the sun angle gets worse every day for a
> chance at recovery.
>
> So don't hold your breath this operating period. Have fun on
> ISS, its working great! And if you have an unattended beacon
> via W3ADO-1, please turn it off. Thanks
>
> Bob, Wb4APR
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb