I want to know why Murray is still a director. Is this a safety thing to help ensure some continuity and that the club acts in the best interests of "Charlton", or does it mean that Jimenez & Co aren't as minted as we'd like and could only afford a % buyout?

"What we won't do is create unrealistic pie in the sky expectations. We will always live within our means and, with a sound commercial approach and the run of the ball on the pitch, our aim, obviously, is to make steady, upward progress and bring success to The Valley."

[cite]Posted By: Stig[/cite]I want to know why Murray is still a director. Is this a safety thing to help ensure some continuity and that the club acts in the best interests of "Charlton", or does it mean that Jimenez & Co aren't as minted as we'd like and could only afford a % buyout?

Because it's their company and they'd want to call all the shots? Because they'd wan't their own people in place? Because they want to start thing afresh? Loads of reasons. Perhaps we should take it as a good sign though.