I'm available today too, but probably too late for the west coasters?
On Jan 12, 2016 3:57 AM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
> FWIW I'm available for a call today if needed, but in principle I agree
> with the changes that Jacob made in the PR.
>
> P
>
> On 12/01/2016 03:28, Doug Schepers wrote:
>
>> Hi, Jacob–
>>
>> It doesn't seem like the call was scheduled for tomorrow. Should we try
>> anyway, or should we be more proactive for next week?
>>
>> Regards–
>> –Doug
>>
>> On 1/5/16 12:13 AM, Jacob Rossi wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Doug,
>>>
>>> Thanks for sending (beat me to it!). Since we're producing editor's
>>> drafts of the Pointer Events L2 spec and have consensus that the
>>> group wants to eventually publish that as a Recommendation, we agree
>>> that the next step is to recharter the Pointer Events WG.
>>>
>>> I've submitted a PR to your charter draft that provides our suggested
>>> changes [1]. To summarize:
>>>
>>> * For the Scope intro, I've used similar text to the previous PEWG
>>> charter. - I've added specific example features we intend to pursue
>>> for 2.0 that weren't in 1.0. These are meant to be examples and not a
>>> commitment nor an exhaustive list. * For Out of Scope, I have copied
>>> the same scope as the previous PEWG charter. * Pointer Events 2.0
>>> deliverable - I've removed the language about building on the Touch
>>> Events specification. I don't believe it's a goal for the PE 2.0
>>> deliverable to incorporate any Touch Events features. * Added Github
>>> as a forum for technical discussion and communication * Added Touch
>>> Events Community Group as a point of coordination for the PEWG given
>>> the related technology
>>>
>>> Shall we schedule a call next week to discuss next steps for
>>> rechartering?
>>>
>>> -Jacob
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/pull/10
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Doug Schepers
>>> [mailto:schepers@w3.org] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 8:19 PM To:
>>> public-pointer-events@w3.org; Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>; Jacob
>>> Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>; Art Barstow
>>> <art.barstow@gmail.com> Subject: Pointer Events Charter?
>>>
>>> Hi, folks–
>>>
>>> As you know, the Pointer Events WG charter expired on 9 November
>>> 2015, so there is currently no formal WG; this isn't really a problem
>>> until we want to publish something, but it does tend to detract from
>>> a sense of urgency and momentum.
>>>
>>> During the last Pointer Events / Touch Events telcon [1], on 3
>>> November, the conclusion was that we did indeed want to recharter the
>>> Pointer Events WG (or some new WG that continues the work of Pointer
>>> Events and Touch Events).
>>>
>>> I've drafted a very rough charter, and I need your concrete feedback
>>> on what the charter should say, what work is in scope, and what
>>> deliverables (i.e. specs) should be listed.
>>>
>>> We sent out early notice to the AC that this rechartering was going
>>> on, but it seems to have stalled out. The next step is to finalize
>>> the charter, and put it out for AC review.
>>>
>>> I haven't yet received any feedback on the new charter, or
>>> suggestions on what it should say; it's not yet ready for AC review,
>>> and it won't be until I get this crucial feedback.
>>>
>>> Do we still want to re-form the Pointer Events WG, or are we still in
>>> a holding pattern in the Community Group.
>>>
>>> Please advise me on what you'd like to do at this point.
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2015/11/03-pointerevents-minutes.html#item06
>>> [2] http://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/pointer-events-2015.html
>>>
>>> Regards– –Doug
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>