This is not accurate. Section 1274 calls for a completely unclassified report to congress. The presidential signing doesn't say he is refusing to create a report, the statement is merely indicating that the president can classify information based on current law and requirements of the executive branch.
Same for section 1290. The signing statement isn't refusing to follow it.

Yes but which jets? Did we refuel the aircrafts during their mission that recently hit the school bus? I think you are conflating all activity together. Do you see how close Saudi Arabia is with Yemen, if they see a target they want to hit, they can hit it without being refueled mid flight.
We sell weapons and jets to lots of countries, the USA government isn't manufacturing the weapons, its Lockheed Martin etc, these companies lobby congress for approval to sell the weapons overseas. By your logic all of congress is complicit including the likes of Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Justin Amash. They could do more to stop it but don't. They are all war criminals?
Gun manufacturers in the USA sell firearms to millions of people annually, some people commit murder with these firearms. All gun manufacturers and their employees are guilty of murder? This is your logic.

Provide a clear definition of war criminal. You claim the Saudi's commit war crimes in Yemen, which actions are linked directly to USA support? I don't think we have full information on that. I'm against providing them weapons and support but I don't think the MIC can be linked directly back to the president to a sufficient degree to call him a war criminal at this time. You're argument of "he could stop it at anytime" and because he doesn't makes him a war criminal is really weak logically.

It's a known quantity at this point and incredibly popular bi-partisanship, passed Senate 87-10, passed House 359-54. Interestingly Rand was MIA. Where was his principled stand against military spending?
Cruz (R-TX), Yea
Lee (R-UT), Nay
Paul (R-KY), Not Voting
McCain (R-AZ), Not Voting
Amash, Nay
Massie, Nay

trash author. Says congress isn't doing its job then says the solution is get rid of POTUS and replace with executive council????? How about fix congress? An executive council would be even less held accountable. Read between the lines, this author just wants tyranny of the majority, fuck the Republic.

The text of this proposal isn't available yet but past proposals the fees on money transfers would not apply to US citizens and legal permanent residents. The regulatory relief is to waive environmental restrictions and building requirements such as environment impact statements before construction can start.

I think he is pushing for what can be realistically accomplished. He knows we can never pay off the debt so the best option is to regain economic and manufacturing superiority so when we default on all of our foreign creditors, we are not totally decimated. Peter Schiff talks the same way, we have to stop spending and consuming, we have to be saving and producing.

What a joke judge. He says the rescission of DACA is subject to judicial review because it is an administrative action, not enforcement discretion. He deliberately ignores the memo establishing DACA was claimed to be enforcement discretion, not an administrative action, thus not subject to judicial review or the Administrative Procedures Act.

Yes we send hundreds of billions of dollars overseas buying foreign stuff we could easily make ourselves, and then foreign investors turn around and use their dollars to finance our out of control federal spending and buy our real estate pushing prices up so the middle class gets wiped out. such a great trade...
our trade imbalance is just one component of several unfortunate realities we face today.

Now compare Fed taxes per capita. Just proves Washington doesn't care about Puerto Rico and is also responsible for the decades of mismanagement of the island territory. The sooner Puerto Rico becomes independent or annexed to another country, the better.

That angle is already decided, especially in contrast to any opponent he may face. He is seen as a stalwart defender of those values, his voters understood during the election he wasn't a perfect person in their eyes. And that Mike Lee video isn't recent its almost 2 years old.

I haven't seen this, where are the posts like this????? I haven't been in this thread because I don't support the air strike actions, however you appear to be blind to the fact of the alternative in a Hillary Clinton presidency would be full scale war in Syria and potentially with Russia. I'd like to see your posts in an alternate timeline when Hillary Clinton is President, it probably goes something like "I would give anything to have stopped her".