According to the city, the four pension plans for its police, teachers, firefighters, and office staff are dreadfully underfunded to the tune of some $19.5 billion. The Times says the teachers’ pension plan “stands at risk of collapse,” while the others are close behind. At present $500 million of the city’s $3 billion annual budget goes to make partial payments into those funds and to service its debt, but in 2015, under state law, the city will have to double that contribution to $1 billion, a third of total revenues. Even if the city is able to pay that amount, the pension plans won’t become solvent again until 2040.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel, President Obama’s former chief of staff, sees what’s coming: “This is kind of the dark cloud coming ever closer.” But he says that raising taxes on Chicagoans by enough to solve the problem — an increase in property taxes of 150% from present levels — is simply “unacceptable.”

Part of the problem is unwillingness on the part of the mayor and the city’s aldermen to recognize the size of the problem. While the city claims that the unfunded liability is approaching $20 billion, a study released by Pew Charitable Trusts in January this year calculated that Chicago’s real unfunded pension liabilities were closer to $25 billion, and that number was based on 2009 figures. Moody’s, in explaining its three-notch credit downgrade in May, said that Chicago's real liability is rapidly approaching $40 billion and added that the city’s budget is “already burdened by high fixed costs, including unrelenting public safety demands and significant debt service payments.” The demand by the state that Chicago double its pension contributions starting in 2015 will place “tremendous strain on the city’s operating budget.” Moody’s added:

Absent significant growth in the city’s operating revenues, escalating pension funding requirements will increasingly strain the city’s operating budget, as pension outlays compete with other spending priorities including debt service and public safety.

Even more troublesome is that the city has made no contributions whatsoever — none — to the city’s retirement health programs for its retirees, adding at least another billion to the shortfall facing the city.

The Times was clear on where some of these troubles started:

They are the result of city contributions … that failed to accumulate nearly enough money, two economic downturns in the 2000s that led to heavy investment losses, and impasse in the State Capitol [the entity that determines Chicago’s contributions].

There are other contributing factors as well, which the Times failed to mention: crime and corruption, which are driving citizens out of the city. In 1950, Chicago’s population exceeded 3.6 million, but in 2012 it is 2.7 million and declining. According to Aaron Renn, writing in the City Journal, Chicago lost more than 7 percent of its jobs in the last 10 years while the Chicago Loop, the second largest business district in the country, shrank by nearly 20 percent.

In addition, dozens of Chicago aldermen and other city officials have been found guilty.

All the pieces and parts of Chicago’s history that have brought it to its present sorry state of impending financial disaster are the same pieces and parts that brought down Detroit: a shrinking population base, followed by shrinking revenues, a fierce reluctance to face financial reality, and a willingness to continue to make promises that couldn't be kept, in order to secure reelections and the continuing flow of graft. Detroit may be the first olive out of the bankruptcy bottle but Chicago, though a much bigger olive, will likely soon follow Detroit out of that same bottle if nothing changes.

Photo of Chicago skyline as seen from U.S. Cellular Field

A graduate of Cornell University and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at www.LightFromTheRight.com, primarily on economics and politics. He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Please review our Comment Policy before posting a comment

Thank you for joining the discussion at The New American. We value our readers and encourage their participation, but in order to ensure a positive experience for our readership, we have a few guidelines for commenting on articles. If your post does not follow our policy, it will be deleted.

No profanity, racial slurs, direct threats, or threatening language.

No product advertisements.

Please post comments in English.

Please keep your comments on topic with the article. If you wish to comment on another subject, you may search for a relevant article and join or start a discussion there.

Comments that we consider abusive, spammy, off-topic, or harassing will be removed.

If our filtering system detects that you may have violated our policy, your comment will be placed in a queue for moderation. It will then be either approved or deleted. Once your comment is approved, it will then be viewable on the discussion thread.

If you need to report a comment, please flag it and it will be reviewed. Thank you again for being a valued reader of The New American.