> A very basic problem that I, and others like me, have is to>determine who is worthy of trust. It is a very time-consuming process to>read the posts of Paul Arveson, Glenn Morton, George Murphy, Allan Harvey>and other regulars, to compare these with the contributions of Reasons to>Believe, Answers in Action, and CRI and to try to sort out those who meet>the criteria of objective, coherent truth.

* * * W A R N I N G * * *

I cannot speak for others, but as for me I must warn you and all others who read
this list that Paul Arveson does not always speak the truth. He is a fallen
person and, though usually sincere, may not be considered either trustworthy,
logically consistent, or morally pure. Be forewarned.