Where Should Your Money Be In This “No Safe Haven Era”?

How have the traditional safe havens performed since the great financial crash of 2008/2009? What can we expect from the traditional safe havens going forward? Those are the two questions we try to answer in this article.

So says Taki Tsaklanos (goldsilverworlds.com) in edited excerpts from his original article* entitled Safe Havens Since The Great Financial Crisis.

The following article is presented by Lorimer Wilson, editor ofwww.munKNEE.com (Your Key to Making Money!), www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com (A site for sore eyes and inquisitive minds) and the FREEMarket Intelligence Report newsletter (sample here; register here) and has been edited, abridged and/or reformatted (some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. This paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.

Tsaklanos goes on to say in further edited excerpts:

The safe havens we look at in this article are the US Dollar, US Treasuries, gold and the Yen. Obviously, with a never seen amount of debt backing the US dollar and the Yen, some would (rightfully) question their safe haven status. However, the reality is that the market is considering them safe havens, because of a lack of globally accepted alternatives.

The USD

The US Dollar is shown in the first of the four charts below. We have marked several key events in the last five years which, combined with the pattern on the chart, tell an interesting story. Our interest is in the big picture, not in trading. We look at the monthly charts to smooth short term price movements, which we consider noise in the context of this article.

As the great financial crisis started to unfold in 2008, there was a flight to the US Dollar and Treasuries, as well as the Yen. The depth of the crisis marked the top of the US Dollar. The greenback has not been able to exceed its 2009 heights.

When Mr. Bernanke opened the easy money gate and flooded the banking system with a tsunami of liquidity (aka QE1), the value of the dollar logically fell down. In the year 2009, the dollar lost 15% of its value.

When the end of the first stimulus package came in sight, the value of the dollar reversed its course. The end of QE1 is marked in green on the chart, implying it is dollar positive (pardon us, we know that central bankers do not consider a strengthening currency as positive, but let’s stick to simple human being logic).

The second round of QE resulted in a smaller loss in the value of the dollar.

Again, the end of QE2 made the greenback go up in value.

In 2012, the world was fearing a breakup of the Euro area. The Euro crisis resulted in a flight to safety, i.e. the US dollar (indicated with a green arrow on the chart). However, as of that point in time, we see several “irregularities” in the dollar index.

when “QE Infinity” started, contrary to the previous rounds of monetary injections, the dollar went higher ’till the summer of 2013. A plausible explanation for this would be the start of a strong bull market in US equities.

the crisis in Syria was not really able to send the Dollar higher. The fact that the Syria crisis was short lived could serve as an explanation.

since the first round of tapering in December 2013, the Dollar has been losing ground. Admittedly, we are not able to find any serious argument as an explanation. The US Fed has tapered already half of their monthly bond purchases; the Dollar has gone down since then. On top of that, the situation in Ukraine is not really supporting the greenback. The only rationale for this trend, in our view, is inherent weakness.

Interestingly, the chart reveals how “dollar positive” events (marked with green arrows) since the summer of last year have not resulted in strength in the dollar.

From a chart perspective, the dollar has arrived at a critical support point. It is testing a key support area for the third time since 2012. Is the dollar weakening because US equities have topped? Or is the world losing trust in its reserve currency?

An insight to answer that question was provided by Alex Merk recently. He stated that the euro is strengthening against the dollar.A currency index is made up of several exchange rates, each one with a specific weight. As is the case for the Dollar index, its most important component is the Euro which accounts for some 55% so increasing trust in the Euro could be the driver, at least partly, of recent dollar weakness.

US Treasuries

Euro strength could explain the major divergence between the US Dollar and US Treasuries. As the second chart above shows, 2014 is a year, so far, which marks weakness in the greenback and strength in Treasuries.

Gold

What about the other two safe havens: gold and the Japanese Yen? Interestingly, both have had a similar pattern since 2009. After an initial drop in the gold price during the financial crisis, the yellow metal went steeply higher until September 2011. Since then, the price has declined ’till December 2013. The Yen has a similar pattern, although it lost much more of its value over the course of 2013.

Japanese Yen

Mind that the Yen index has a composition of 4 other currencies, with an equal weight of 25%: Euro, US Dollar, Australian Dollar, New Zealand Dollar. Recent strength in the Euro and weakness in the Dollar could, for now, explain why gold and the Yen have held up.

Where do we go from here?

…[We can conclude] that:

US Treasuries and gold are the only assets who are significantly higher than where they were at the top of the financial crisis.

Looking at the evolution of safe havens since the great financial crisis is, it seems there is no real safe haven among currencies (mainly US Dollar and Yen).

If the recent past is a prologue of future events, than investors should really be prepared to embrace change. What is considered a safe haven in 2012 is the biggest loser among currencies in 2013.

Going forward, given the correlation between gold and the Yen, there is a high probability that the Nikkei 225 is topping, leading to strength in the Yen index. Admittedly, in distorted markets, this type of simple correlations could be worthless but, nonetheless, one should not exclude a top in equities and a bottom in Yen, taking gold higher in such an environment.

In general, given the current financial and monetary context, it is not realistic to expect another 12 year bull market in any asset, even not in gold or silver. With the distortion created by central planners it is unlikely that a long term rise in any asset is able to hold. The global currency war will undoubtedly result in cracks in the monetary system and in several currencies in particular. Do not exclude the landscape to change with a political decision; in a matter of seconds the world could look different.

In the same respect, the probability of a monetary event shocking the landscape of currencies is very high. In case gold is remonetized with the aim to alleviate the world’s debt burden, a sudden spike in the price of gold could realistically be expected. However, it remains anyone’s guess when and how that will happen.

Conclusion

For individuals and investors, it seems a safe bet to be prepared in the “no safe haven era” with physical gold in its possession, outside the banking system. That is the ultimate safety on counterparty risk which cannot be provided by any other safe haven.

[Editor’s Note: The author’s views and conclusions in the above article are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original post. Furthermore, the views, conclusions and any recommendations offered in this article are not to be construed as an endorsement of such by the editor.]

It’s hard to predict what will trigger the next collapse of stocks, but gold is already on the road to new highs with Janet Yellen gearing up to unleash a new torrent of freshly printed dollars onto global markets. I’d recommend you start building your ark well in advance. Read More »

You are going to see the price of gold go up… a lot and it may go up a lot in a very short period of time. It’s not going to go up 10% per year for seven years and the price doubles. It’s going to chug along sideways, maybe in an upward trend, with a lot of volatility. It will have a kind of a slow grind upward… and then a spike… and then another spike… and then a super-spike. The whole thing could happen in a matter of 90 days — six months at the most. Read More »

DISCLOSURE: It is our intent that all posts on this site be in accordance with the requirements, restrictions and terms of the Copyright Law of the United States and all other copyright treaties to which the United States is party and more specifically of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act - Blogger . As such, all posts on this website have been screened at Library of Congress Catalog as to their eligibility for posting. Should any post be deemed to be inadvertently in contravention of these Acts' terms please advise with substantiation of such apparent contravention (i.e. registration number) and the article in question will be immediately deleted from the site. Also, visit U.S. Code 17-107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights - Fair Use

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of financial, economic and investment issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER: Lorimer Wilson is not a registered advisor and does not give investment advice per se. The articles to be found on the site are expressions of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. Please consult with a qualified investment advisor who is licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments. The information on this site was obtained from sources which we believe to be reliable, but we do not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities. Please note that while Wilson may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are recommended or otherwise covered on this website they do not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security and, as such, you should consider this before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you read on the site.