Investigating Physics within a starting point of using the knowledge accumulated within the scientific research and applying it for the benefit of humanity,to Support Humanity and all Life as a whole in Equality and Oneness.

About

Finding how Physics and Science can be looked at differently in order to support us to walk ourselves into realignment with the law of physics that govern all that is here, within the understanding that we must align ourselves with the law of physics in order to exist in harmony and equilibrium.

In the following blogs I will be going back to basics, thus I will be
walking a step by step process, through the textbook "Fundamentals of Physics
Extended", 8th Edition, by David Halliday, Robert Resnick and Jearl Walker, and
through the investigation of this book I will open up points as they come up in
regards to how we can utilize the world of physics to derive common sense
perspective that can, within application, support humanity to align ourselves
with the law of physics, as we have been existing in separation from it and only
using it to our benefit within manipulating the physical through our acquired
knowledge and research, instead of co-existing with the physical, learning from
it and projecting what we see in the physical onto ourselves to find inner
insight as to how we can perfect ourselves as the physical within the
law of physics works as perfection, as wholeness, as unity.

Chapter 1.1 - STANDARDS OF LENGTH, MASS, AND TIME
The three basic quantities in Mechanics are length [L], mass [M], and time
[T], while all other quantities in mechanics can be expressed in terms of these
three. For instance, as has been shown in previous blogs, velocity is defined by
how much length a body moves in a period of time, thus it would be expressed by
length divided to time, thus [L]/[T], volume is three dimensions of length as
height times width times depths, thus will be expressed by [L]^3, acceleration
is the change in velocity through time and thus will be expressed as velocity
divided by time which will give us [L]/[T]^2, and force as we've seen is mass
times acceleration F=ma, thus force will be expressed as [M][L]/[T]^2.

Though, as we know all these quantities can be expressed in different units,
length can be referring to a meter, a centimeter, a mile etc. mass can be
described as a pound, a kilo, a gram etc. and time can be a second, a month, a
year etc. Due to all the different options to express the same quantity, we can
clearly see that a standard unit must be defined for effective communication
within the scientific community and humanity as a whole - to be able to build a
bridge over a river we must be able to communicate effectively as to how wide
the river is, we must thus speak the same "language" of units, for this reason
the scientific community was wise to create and define an international
standardized system known as the SI System units, which defined the units of
length (meters), mass (kilograms), and time (seconds), and other units for
temperature, electric current and more.

It's important to emphasize that the units chosen are completely arbitrary
from the perspective that they don't have any actual physical value nor any
actual physical meaning - a meter is merely the distance between two lines on a
specific platinum–iridium bar, it is a length chosen randomly, it was accepted
historically and "stuck", same as with time - the duration of the day was
divided to 24 hour periods and then every hour was divided to 60 minutes and
every minute to 60 seconds, and this was convenient due to the era and how the
measurements were done and it was accepted, though it could have been any other
division of the day and the laws of physics would not have been interfered.

This next text is for you to be amused as I was when I read how some of these
units came about, here is a glimpse of how arbitrary they are:

Copied from the textbook (pg. 4) - "In A.D. 1120 the king of England
decreed that the standard of length in his country would be named the yard and
would be precisely equal to the distance from the tip of his nose to the end of
his outstretched arm. Similarly, the original standard for the foot adopted by
the French was the length of the royal foot of King Louis XIV. This standard
prevailed until 1799, when the legal standard of length in France became the
meter, defined as one ten-millionth the distance from the equator to the North
Pole along one particular longitudinal line that passes through Paris."

The practicality of having an international system for units is clear, yet
it's interesting to see that to this day some countries and organizations are
still not willing to let go their historical choice of units and to join the
rest of the world in unison - there are some units that have proven to be more
practical than others, for instance the metric / decimal system is very
convenient for length as it goes in the power of 10, so mathematically and
intuitively it's easy to deal with this unit and transition from different
scales within it as from millimeters to kilometers and so on, you just multiply
or divide by a power of 10 - despite the simplicity of the metric system, still
today you will find the mile system being used even though it is much more
complicated as there are 1760 yards in a mile, and 3 feet in a yard - the only
reason this awkward system is still being used is based in ego, separation and
money as those that insist to keep on using this system, as America for
instance, are doing so from self interest reasons, not considering what would be
best for the scientific, engineering and other professional communities and
humanity as a whole, as they want to maintain their individuality within
"respecting" their heritage or for other political and economical reasons, even
though it doesn't make any sense and is actually dangerous as there have been
many documented occasions over the years of mistakes happening due to the
different unit systems, some fetal and some amusing, due to the confusion in
unit conversions or a simple disregard to which unit is being used at the moment
- some of these mistake are presented in this document.

Here is a chance for us, as humanity, to learn from this example and take in
some supportive features as well as learn from the compromising aspects of this
point - within creating the standardized units we are given both an example of
applying a common sense principle that is best for all as having one
standardized system of units for the entire world, as we all communicate and
share information constantly and continually, and thus, having one system has
many benefits as well as preventing misunderstanding as the link above clearly
show exist, and thus acts within the principle of prevention is the best cure -
on the other hand, we are simultaneously shown the nature of the human, as the
human exist within self interest to keep an individualized self definition, as a
unit system in this case, as the desire to hold on to ones individuality is
greater than the practical common sense of all agreeing on one system that will
benefit all and will through having one system prevent dangerous mishaps.

Now, just to be clear, it's not to say that the SI unit is the most effective
and practical system that can be, though the decimal system has proven itself to
be very effective and easy to use, it's the principle of having one system for
all, just as the common sense in having one language for all as English is the
accepted scientific language, and thus scientist can communicate and share
findings through this common language. Once all agree on a system, the system
can be adjusted and improved to perfection, and thus form the one most effective
system that all work with.

The principle of having a standardized system will have an economic and
ecological effect as all equipment for any industry will be geared to one
system, so we will not need to produce the same equipment in different unit
scales, as well as all the accessory equipment to go with it. Standardizing
allows us to put our efforts in perfecting the chosen standard and improving it
as new research and data allow us - this type of common sense is suggested in
the equal money system, as having the best
and highest
standard for everything we need, thus for instance, we will have only one
best cell phone charger that will be suitable for all phones, this will allow
the highest standard taking into consideration all knowledge in the field, and
will eliminate all the extra production we are now creating with many different
chargers, as each phone uses a different charger and when you change your phone,
all the accessories have to change with it because nothing is yet to be
standardized. Another example is electricity, there isn't an international
standard in electricity so in every country you have to have converters to use
your electronic shaver, or laptop, and thus you need to purchase more
"accessories" to you equipment, and thus more needs to be produced, and thus more energy is wasted
and more pollution is being
created - all because we have not standardized.

But as long as we are working with many systems, we will have all equipment
in all different units, thus we now see that standardization has an economical
effect and thus economic interests are pulling the strings, and not the interest
of humanity as a whole, as many people have a profit based interest to keep the
different standards alive, because it requires more factories, and thus more
jobs and more money flow - this might sound like a good thing, but this is
actually a good thing only to those that benefit from the capitalistic system,
and it is seen as good only through the narrow sighted mind of capitalism, thus,
I suggest investigate
the equal money system, as there is explicit and detailed information as how
we can create a system that actually support us within being aligned with all
that is here, and thus creating a system that is aligned with the law of the
physical, as one with the physical as all life that is here, which should be the
goal of the science of physics, as this is the only way we can walk with the
forces of nature and not against them - as we can be sure that if at war with
nature - nature will eventually win, if not the temporary battle, than certainly
the war. Thus, we must align ourselves, use all the insight physics is providing
us, use the brightest brains according to the system, and apply them to create
an entire system that in all aspect supports us as humanity through aligning
ourselves to support and walk with all that is here.

Having said that, another point to look at and consider is that, as I've
said, the individual quantities and their units have no value in the physical,
what does have value is the relationships and interactions between them.
Humanity, and scientists as representatives and main influencers on our belief
system, have been emphasizing the quantity as what has value instead of looking
at and investigating further the relationships and interactions - they have
considered these three quantities as mass, length and time to be stable and
constant and have gone to great measures to standardize them, but then came
along Einstein's special theory of relativity, which I will expand on in later
blogs, but in short, what Einstein had found is that all these quantities are
relative from perspective that their value changes according to the velocity
they are moving in, and according to the frame of reference they are being
looked at from, and thus he demonstrated that even mass, length and time are
relative, and thus exist within a relationship to their velocity, which means
that their property as their value is aligned and defined according to their
relationship and interaction with the rest of existence and are not in fact
standing stable and independent as initially they have been considered to be.

Yet, the general perspective hasn't changed all that much in over 100 years
since relativity and it's implications were discovered - we as humanity, thanks
to the paradigm that we exist within, thanks to the scientists that have become
like gods in the modern world and their word and perspective of reality has been
valued to such an extent due to their influence on our economy and life in all
arenas, still view the world within a starting point of individual quantities
while disregarding the interconnectedness, relationships and interactions
between all these quantities that we so thrive to measure, compare and perfect.

As long as we hold onto the starting point of defining a quantity by it's
value, and thus looking for the value of a quantity and disregard it's
relationship and interaction with everything else in existence we are
disregarding the essence of the world in which we live in, we are ignoring the
actuality of reality as everything is in fact in a constant interaction and
cannot be isolated and defined as an individualized quantity - this is clearly
seen in the education system,
as we educate children to compete and achieve good grades as the value given to
their studies, but there is no emphasis in teaching them to relate with their
environment, there is no attempt to teach them about real intimate communication
with each other, the whole education system, as a reflection of our society, is
directing our children towards competition, as isolated individual with a value
defining them, not through their ability to interact and thus not educating them
to interact, but through standardized test, a quantity, a grade, a number -
ignoring who they are as life, and looking only at the standard.