Friday, 24 August 2012

“War is essentially an evil thing. Its consequences are not confined to the
belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world. To initiate a war of aggression therefore, is
not only an international crime, it is the supreme international crime
differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the
accumulated evil of the whole.”

Nuremburg War Crimes Tribunal
1946

The
method used by British Governments to persuade the nation to wage war is as old
as the hills - lie repeatedly about the illegality of war. The British Government used the same lie to
promote the war with Libya as it had done for the wars with Afghanistan and
Iraq - that military action by HM forces
is lawful and authorised by the UN Security Council operating under Chapter VII
of the UN Charter.

On
March 21st 2011, shortly before 559 MPs voted in favour of illegal military action against Libya, the UK
Government issued a statement making the false claim that the deployment of British
forces against Libya was lawful and authorised by UN Security Council
Resolution 1973; their note declared:

“The Attorney General has been consulted
and Her Majesty's Government is satisfied that this Chapter VII authorisation to use all necessary measures provides
a clear and unequivocal legal basis for deployment of UK forces and military
assets to achieve the resolution's objectives”.

This
Government statement, claiming that the armed attack on Libya would be legal,
exemplifies the way in which British politicians, lawyers and civil servants
pervert and break the law. By cross-checking
Government statements against the laws governing the use of force, it can
quickly be established that the wars with Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya are all illegal.

The law of war

The
two main legal documents which govern the use of armed force in international
affairs are the UN Charter and UN General Assembly Resolution 2625. The first lays down the law and the second
explains how to interpret it.

The UN Charter

The
UN Charter is the Statute which lays down the legally binding terms of this
agreement in 111 Articles. Article 2
states the purposes of the United Nations and includes these rules:

2.3 All members shall settle their international
disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace, security
and justice are not endangered.

2.4 All members shall refrain in their
international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial
integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner
inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

Chapter
VII of the UN Charter (Articles 39 - 51) contains the rules governing the measures
that the UN Security Council may take to bring about peace and security. Article 41 states:

The Security
Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be
employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon members of the
United Nations to apply such measures…

To
a person with common sense the phrase not involving
the use of armed force means not involving the use of armed force; so why do British Government
lawyers repeatedly claim that the UN Security Council has authorised the use of
armed force when it is clearly forbidden?

UN General Assembly Resolution 2625

In 1970 the United Nations agreed 51 new
definitions of the law governing in UNGA Resolution
2625:

DECLARATION ON PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
CONCERNING FRIENDLY RELATIONS AND

CO-OPERATION AMONG STATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS

This
Declaration is one of the most important legal documents the world has ever
produced; yet few if any public office holders in Britain or America have seen
it or read it. It includes these rules:

Every State
has the duty to refrain in its international relations from the threat or use
of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any
State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United
Nations. Such a threat or use of force
constitutes a violation of international law and the Charter of the United
Nations and shall never be employed as a means of settling international
issues.

No State or
group of States has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any
reason whatever, in the internal or external affairs of any other State.
Consequently, armed intervention and all other forms of interference or
attempted threats against the personality of the State or against its
political, economic and cultural elements are in violation of international
law.

The
principles of the Charter which are embodied in this Declaration constitute
basic principles of international law, and consequently [the UN General Assembly] appeals to all States to be guided by these principles in their
international conduct and to develop their mutual relations on the basis of the
strict observance of these principles.

These laws are crystal clear. The use of force is prohibited. The use of armed force to attack other
nations is a crime. No state or group of
States such as NATO, ISAF[1]
or the EU, may intervene in another State’s affairs and every State must obey,
uphold and enforce these rules.

The crimes associated with waging aggressive war,
laid down in the Nuremburg Principles and the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court, are also clear. If any person, in furtherance of a state policy,
orders the use of force to attack members of a national, ethnic, racial or
religious group, that person and everyone who takes part in the attack is
responsible for the consequences, breaks international law and, if it results
in the deaths of innocent people, commits the universal crimes of genocide,
crimes against humanity, war crimes, aggression or conduct ancillary to such
crimes.

So
why do British and NATO politicians, lawyers and civil servants interpret
phrases such as all necessary measures,
humanitarian intervention, and not involving the use of armed force to
mean using weapons of mass destruction such as cruise missiles, rockets,
drones, bombs and radioactive munitions to invade and occupy Afghanistan and
Iraq or to attack Libya? Could the real
reason for these heinous decisions to kill innocent civilians and destroy
weaker nations be a psychopathic lack of conscience and moral values, or is it
perhaps because they know that they control the law enforcement processes and
can ensure that they will never be arrested, prosecuted or convicted for their
war crimes, for the suffering inflicted on their victims or the horrific
consequences of their decisions.

For more than sixty years UK
Government Ministers, officers and lawyers have deceived everyone over the
illegality of war and armed conflict and have got away with it. These massacres of Afghan, Iraqi and Libyan
civilians in which at least 450,000 children have died and more than 1m have
been injured and maimed since 2001 are the worst atrocities in British
history. Why is it then that not one
member of the UK establishment is willing to call a halt to the killing or
speak out against it? Why is it that
those with the power to stop the wars and enforce the laws repeatedly refuse to
do so?

It is time for law abiding
citizens everywhere to take a stand against Britain’s political, civil,
judicial and military leaders and institutions to ensure that the killing is
stopped, the resort to war is ended and those responsible for the deaths of
1.5m civilians are arrested and prosecuted for their crimes.

Chris Coverdale The
Peace Strike August 2012

[In his next
article Chris will lay out what individual citizens in NATO countries can do to
stop their Governments from waging illegal wars, murdering civilians,
committing crimes against humanity and corrupting the justice process.]

Sunday, 12 August 2012

This is not a political issue, it is one of law.David
Cameron has said that this is Great
Britain’s time.

Yes it is
time; for the citizens of Great
Britain to demand and effect the arrest of
all MP’s whose unlawful actions have directly resulted in, genocide, war
crimes, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity and abuse of Human and
Civil rights.

This is not
a political issue, it is one of law.

The laws
they have broken are both domestic and International.

The treaty for the renunciation of war 1928 [Kellogg-Briand-Pact] prohibits
resort to war and requires that all disputes are settled peacefully.

The UN Charter 1945 prohibits the threat or use of force and
requires states to work together in conformity with the principles of justice
and international law to maintain peace.

The Nuremburg War Crimes Trials 1946 upheld the principle that waging
aggressive is a war crime and that individuals rather than states can be held
to account in a court for war crimes.

The Geneva Convention 1949, 1977 govern the conduct of warfare, the
protection of civilians and prisoners of war whilst prohibiting wilful killing,
attacks on civilians, destruction of property, unlawful weapons as well as
designating 33 separate punishable war crimes.

The Genocide Convention 1948 prohibits the adoption of a policy
to destroy members of a national ethnic racial or religious group as such.

The Nuremburg Principles 1950 introduce the concept of personal
responsibility for the universal offences of a crime against peace [waging
aggressive war], crimes against Humanity, war crimes and complicity in such
crimes.

The Chemical Weapons Convention 1992 prohibits the development
production stockpiling and use of chemical weapons.

The Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention1972 prohibits the development production stockpiling and use of
biological and toxic weapons.

The Landmines Convention 1997 prohibits the development production
stockpiling and use of landmines and anti personnel explosives.

The Rome
Statute of the International Criminal Court 1998 gave the International Criminal Court power to
prosecute genocide, crimes against Humanity and war crimes.

This is not
a political issue, it is one of law.

Quote; “Not
involving the use of armed force”

Corporate, capitalists, multi conglomerates,
banks, Governments and businesses ALL who are directly responsible for the
destruction of habitats, species, environments, the displacement of indigenous
people, the pollution of the natural environment, and using force to
repress people are ALL in breach of
Human Rights, and in many cases they are committing war crimes and crimes
against Humanity.

Your human rights breaches that the above are
responsible for are:

The right to life

Freedom from torture and degrading treatment

Freedom from slavery and forced labour

The right to liberty

The right to a fair trial

The right not to be punished for something that
wasn't a crime when you did it

The right to respect for private and family
life

Freedom of thought, conscience and religion,
and freedom to express your beliefs

Freedom of expression

Freedom of assembly and association

The right to marry and to start a family

The right not to be discriminated against in
respect of these rights and freedoms

The right to peaceful enjoyment of your
property

The right to an education

The right to participate in free elections

The right not to be subjected to the death
penalty

If any of these rights and freedoms are
breached, you have a right to an effective solution in law, even if the breach
was by someone in authority, such as, for example, a police officer or other
official.

Serious breaches in domestic and international
laws that the above are responsible for including war crimes

The Geneva Convention 1949, 1977 govern the conduct of warfare, the protection
of civilians and prisoners of war whilst prohibiting wilful killing,
attacks on civilians, destruction of property, unlawful weapons as well as
designating 33 separate punishable war crimes.

The Genocide Convention 1948prohibits the adoption of a
policy to destroy members of a national ethnic racial or religious group as
such.

This is not
a political issue, it is one of law.

Quote; “Not
involving the use of armed force”

We are all
in NOW TIME

It is each
and every Citizens responsibility and duty to demand the law be applied and for
justice to be done and seen to be done.

Saturday, 4 August 2012

A year after the cold bloodied murder of Mark Duggan and the
riots and very little has changed.

The youth are still disenfranchised by an
unlawful government and its unjust cuts whilst the Olympic Games are costing
tax payers £24 billions of pounds to reveal one aspect of what is already known,
and that is that there are many talented youth in Great Britain.These monies would have been far better spent directly on homes, education, health and opportunities for all youth.Unfortunately the only legacy the games will bring once they are closed will be a massive £24 Billion pound bill, picked up by Londoner's, unemployment and unused venues.If any of these venues do continue to exist, they will be charging Londoner's for the privilege of using them.

It is each and every adults duty and responsibility to make
sure that the Children are not failed and brainwashed by those who have little
care or consideration for their immediate and long term well being.

Recently £80 billion of tax payer’s money has been loaned to
banks at 0.75% interest, so that they can then lend it back to the People with
a 5% interest rate charge.

Several months ago the Bank of England printed £180 billion
and gave it to the banks, saying it was to be used for exactly the same
purpose. Where has this money gone?

The Libor
fixing that has recently been revealed is the tip of a financial ice berg, with
corruption and manipulation being rife.

The Leveson enquiry revealed much but investigated very
little and as an affront to justice when a protestor entered and demanded that
Tony Blair, who was giving evidence at the time, should be arrested for war
crimes. There was no action or investigation into the charge that the man had
put to Tony Blair and laid before the Court.

The only investigation that followed was to find out how this man
was able to enter the Leveson enquiry.

The activity of Rupert Murdocks News Empire was shown to be
deeply flawed and subversive. With the recent charges of contempt and
perverting the course of justice being leveled at close friend of David
Cameron, Rebecca Brooks. By association David Cameron can not be trusted as
being honourable nor
just.

The London
Mayor Boris Johnson has also personally invited his dear friend Rupert to join
him for some free 2012 Olympic Games free executive hospitality at the expense
of the tax payer. Without doubt this is not what Londoners or the Nation as a
whole would wish for or condone and shows the level of contempt that these
elitist openly declare to the public.

Human Rights abuses that occurred on the same night as the
Olympic opening ceremony have been sorely underplayed by the main media. Over
180 peaceful cyclists from critical mass were arrested and detained against
their will by police enforcing new draconian laws that were rushed in to
appease the corporate sponsors and the Olympic committee.

It would seem ironic that many of the Gold medals being won at
the 2012 Olympics are for cycling events.

Your human rights are:

the right to life

freedom from torture and degrading treatment

freedom from slavery and forced labour

the right to liberty

the right to a fair trial

the right not to be punished for something that wasn't a crime when you did it

the right to respect for private and family life

freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and freedom to express your beliefs

freedom of expression

freedom of assembly and association

the right to marry and to start a family

the right not to be discriminated against in respect of these rights and freedoms

the right to peaceful enjoyment of your property

the right to an education

the right to participate in free elections

the right not to be subjected to the death penalty

If any of these rights and freedoms are breached, you have a right to an effective solution in law, even if the breach was by someone in authority, such as, for example, a police officer.

The ongoing repression of peoples liberties is unacceptable,
along with the corruption and deceit that has manifested within the house of
the People and the justice system. The People are being failed.

How as a Nation can we educate and benefit our children when
we are allowing the criminal, the unjust and the corrupt to run our Country?

How can we hope for aspirations to be achieved when we are
allowing our Country to be run by war criminals?

If this
unlawful activity is allowed to continue, where do you all think it will end?

Have so many fought and strived so hard for all to come to naught.

Millions of people have and are defending against and
defeating tyranny and repression.It is our charge as People of these lands to uphold the law,
the peace and the rights of the People. We must do all that is possible to set
the house in order and install, accountability, transparency, honest protocols
and longevity.

If the base components of a system are broken they must be
changed in order for functionality to be restored.

WHEN WAR IS ILLEGAL PAYING TAX IS A WAR CRIME

Each of the wars fought since 2001 against Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya is illegal. Not only does the use of armed force violate the Treaty for the Renunciation of War and the UN Charter, but by killing 1m adults and 450,000 children, the leaders and taxpayers of Coalition, NATO and ISAF governments committed murder, war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

It may come as a shock to many law abiding citizens that, under international criminal law and the legal doctrine of joint enterprise, every British, NATO or ISAF citizen who has paid tax since October 2001 is technically an accessory to the war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocides committed by ISAF Governments against the Afghan people and is criminally liable for arrest, prosecution and punishment as a principal offender. You will be pleased to know however that the legislation provides relief[Footnote] for taxpayers who were deceived into believing the war was legal and unwittingly supported the crimes. Providing you end your participation in the crimes immediately and withhold all taxes from your government and its agents you will not be punished for aiding and abetting the crimes.

Thursday, 2 August 2012

We need no conspiracy theories,we are no longer in the dark. In the clear light of day we can ALL see the basic facts; banks are corrupt, much of politics and many politicians
are corrupt, big business in corrupt, media are corrupt, many councils are corrupt and inept,
management of public services is corrupt, many police and judges are corrupt, or in dereliction of their duties.

To resolve these paramount issues there is only one answer, and that is to charge them all with crimes against peace, crimes
against humanity, genocide and ecocide.

One chance for choice to choose that which is truthful and
just as opposed to that which is ungodly, unconstitutional and an affront to
decency.

The Law is the Law; Police and Judges are bound by position,
duty and oath to uphold International, Domestic and common law.

At present they are in
breach of all.

This charge levied at them is not a work of fiction, as you can see, and to a large degree, already know, the facts speak for themselves. So see this information as an addition and a solid basis for the charges levied

Principle III states, "The fact that a person who
committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as
Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from
responsibility under international law."

Principle IV states: "The fact that a person acted
pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from
responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact
possible to him".

This principle could be paraphrased as follows: "It is
not an acceptable excuse to say 'I was just following my superior's
orders'".

Under the laws of war taxpayers are forbidden from funding an illegal war. If a Government uses money raised by taxation to wage unlawful war, a taxpayer’s normal duty to pay tax is reversed and becomes a duty to withhold tax. If taxpayers continue to pay tax knowing that a war is illegal they commit a criminal offence and can be charged with conduct ancillary to war crimes.

Misconduct in public office is an offence at common law triable only on indictment. It carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. It is an offence confined to those who are public office holders and is committed when the office holder acts (or fails to act) in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office.

The Court of Appeal has made it clear that the offence should be strictly confined. It can raise complex and sometimes sensitive issues. Prosecutors should therefore consider seeking the advice of the Principal Legal Advisor to resolve any uncertainty as to whether it would be appropriate to bring a prosecution for such an offence.

The Common Law Court of Justice investigating Crimes of Church and State

Public Declaration to Police Officers, Civil Servants and other Agents of the Crown of England – Issued by the Judicial Oversight Panel of the Common Law Court of Justice investigating Crimes of Church and State (Brussels – London)

As London prepares to host the Olympic Games, Amnesty International examines its connection to one of the biggest industrial disasters in history.

Human rights abuses in the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories. ­The UK-based G4S, which describes itself as the "world's leading international security solutions group," was selected as the "official provider of security and cash services for the Olympics."

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AT THE 2012 OLYMPIC GAMES OPENING CEREMONY

HUMAN RIGHTSThe right to libertyThe right to a fair trialThe right not to be punished for something that wasn't a crime when you did itThe right to respect for private and family lifeFreedom of thought, conscience and religion, and freedom to express your beliefsFreedom of expressionFreedom of assembly and associationthe right not to be discriminated against in respect of these rights and freedomsThe right to peaceful enjoyment of your property

About Me

Sometime whilst you were sleeping on the dark side of Earth a mysterious craft entered the atmosphere.
There are reports that the occupants of this craft have uploaded and are streaming hardwire information onto the mainframe network of the world.
The F.S.I has been trying to delete this information from the network systems before it reaches the public domain.
When we questioned the K.D.F.S regarding this incident they said they had no comment. We can however reveal today that this hardwire information has some very unusual properties, certain information, frequencies and lines embedded within it's signal can lead to the self
Other properties of this signal are not fully understood though it is said that it has the ability to create links into self awareness and self empowerment within humans.
Due to the sensitivity of this information and it's implications we feel it is our duty to make you aware of this recent development. Further to this we add that people who are experiencing "FUTURE SHOCK" or "SYSTEM SHOCK REALITY” may find something within the signal that will let them know they are not alone.