If you're interested in joining the philosophical discussion, click "sign in" or "create account" on the right of the page. If you're creating a new account, please be sure to include an explanation as to why you're interested in joining the message board community. This verification requirement is included to cut down on possible spam accounts.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Things were moving forward a bit fast for me. I was struggling to hang on to the narrative, partially due to somewhat UK influenced language (because I am norwegian). But I was thinking that the general population in the UK might have some similar things to say about the speed and the slightly stressful way it was presented.

Comments about how bad something is should perhaps be reserved until after explaining why it is bad. (at least in a public setting like youtube). Ie, "This policy does x and y and z, therefore it is arguably one of the worst policies ever made.". Or just explain how it works, in a way to make it easy for the viewers to understand why it is so bad, leaving personal comments out of it.

0

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Things were moving forward a bit fast for me. I was struggling to hang on to the narrative, partially due to somewhat UK influenced language (because I am norwegian). But I was thinking that the general population in the UK might have some similar things to say about the speed and the slightly stressful way it was presented.

Comments about how bad something is should perhaps be reserved until after explaining why it is bad. (at least in a public setting like youtube). Ie, "This policy does x and y and z, therefore it is arguably one of the worst policies ever made.". Or just explain how it works, in a way to make it easy for the viewers to understand why it is so bad, leaving personal comments out of it.

Thank you for the feedback.

It's funny you mention that as one idea he had was to make shorter bite-sized videos on single aspects (that could also be viewed in tandem as a playlist if desired) which would allow him to slow down and focus on the details.

I didn't catch that at first but you're right, it's prefacing each part with an opinion that could be better reserved for the end (similar to Stef's Truth About series ).

I did ask him which aspect was the worst of the worst -- sovereignty was number one.