. . . McLuhan’s interest in Renaissance and Neo-Augustan literature (e.g. Pope [2] and Swift [3], who were interested in Rosicrucianism [4] and Masonry [5]), . . . in modern literature, led him to undertake research into the effects of esoteric thought on the arts. Tracing the symbolism and rituals that were a means of transmitting gnostic [6] and pagan [7] religious thought in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, . . . the role of Rosicrucianism and Masonry in the transition from the Renaissance to the Age of Reason, and . . . these themes and associated liturgies and symbols in modern art and literature– . . . Eliot’s The Waste Land [8] and Joyce’s Ulysses [9]. As a Roman Catholic, McLuhan suspected that “secret societies”, and “secret doctrines”–associated with gnosticism, Rosicrucianism, and Masonry–persisted among elites . . . Following Wyndham Lewis’s condemnation of the “freemasonry of the arts” in Time and Western Man [10], . . .

. . . going through the rituals of secret societies . . . . I’m in a bloody rage . . . arts and sciences are in the pockets of these societies. It doesn’t make me any happier to know that Joyce, Lewis, Eliot, yourself have used these rituals . . . .

On the topic of cultural warfare and control of knowledge:

Monopolies of knowledge are intolerable.The use of the arts for sectarian warfare! ugh. . .
The validity of the rituals is entirely in the cognitive order.Art is imitation of the process of apprehension . . .
. . . the nature of the sectarian strife among the Societies . . .

So, he’s talking about stratification and monopolization of knowledge along with the use of the arts, or culture as a method of warfare via embedded rituals. I guess these are not the kinds of examples he would have been aware of, and not to judge anyone, but I would personally suggest that when we are rolling in the mud, shaving our heads, dressing like zombies, applying tattoos or piercings (body modification), wearing pink as men, removing clothes in public, etc., then we are being made to unknowingly act out the role of slaves or other modes of victimization. Examples of such activities could be analyzed further in another article.

. . . exploring the relations between the Secret Societies and the arts. A grisly business. I don’t know what you know, but I know there isn’t a living artist or critic of repute who isn’t playing their game. I mean their rituals and doctrines as basis of artistic organization.

A footnote (p. 237) explains more about the three Dominicans mentioned. Giordano Bruno’s [19] name “appears repeatedly in Finnegans Wake [9].” Girolamo Savonarola [20] was a “popular preacher.” Tommaso Campanella was the “author of Civitas solis [21] (. . . The City of the Sun)”, a utopian work.

McLuhan makes another relevant point (p. 238):

. . . our six children make a complex life for us, in a way which 25 years ago they would not. The disappearance of servants and large house (not unplanned) is linked to the Manichean [26] hatred of the family, and the Church . . . culpable in allowing this concerted campaign to be met only by sporadic individual . . . resistance.

He complains about the Catholics “dispersing talent instead of concentrating it . . . ”

This letter shows that McLuhan is aware of how society is planned, which unfortunately is very relevant to the various public figures he interacted with as his career progressed. He is also aware that part of this agenda is undermining the family and admits that the Church is guilty of rolling over to it.

Additional InformationAreas for Further Research

Note: unless specified otherwise, web references are cited as accessed on or before March 10, 2018.

Note: Nowadays, under intense propaganda, people–younger generations especially–are more and more considering marriage and family as something objectionable (or not necessary)–at the same time as being dosed in veganism and vegetarianism (the diet of slaves as in Plato’s totalitarian Republic), which is the most unnatural thing, especially since it’s really about subsisting on genetically modified soy. My understanding is that one of the supposed reasons (or rationalizations) behind vegetarianism in ancient times related to the doctrine of reincarnation and animals having souls also. More likely it was also a social engineering tool for limiting mental and reproductive power in the lower classes.

We have had a lot of Gnostic revivalism, occultism and New Age doctrines (which seem to be from oligarchical sources, e.g. Changing Images of Man and the Esalen Institute). This is a big topic which I’ve covered partially in my series on Brave New World Policies, relating to Aldous Huxley’s novel and his mind-control drug and religious activities. In his novel also, people were not allowed to reproduce. Now, soy is being pushed big-time (really, it’s mostly GMO soy, blessed by George Bush Sr. himself), and there are literally opposite statements being made about it online as with certain other topics (like climate change), so it needs to be studied in depth in order to separate out the false statements.

The Apostle Paul had something to say about these competing views to the new Christian religion. It all keeps coming round–speculatively from the same type of trouble-making population-reducing oligarchs in his time:

3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats [NIV: “certain foods”, which I think is likely to be vegetarianism vs. meat-eating rather than unclean vs. clean meats], which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.

4 For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:

Stay up to date

I give Power & Reality permission to collect and use my data submitted in this form.

Give consent that we may collect and use your data.

Mailing List

0% Complete

Privacy Policy: The above statement is added by the mailing list software to comply with EU law. Actually, personal data entered with mailing list subscriptions is only used for the mailing list and nothing else. Also, personal data entered with comments is not used for any other purpose.