Hillary called the Boko Haram kidnapping “abominable – it’s criminal, it’s an act of terrorism and it really merits the fullest response possible, first and foremost from the government of Nigeria.” And earlier, she Tweeted: “Access to education is a basic right & an unconscionable reason to target innocent girls. We must stand up to terrorism. #BringBackOurGirls.” May 9, 2014,

So why didn’t we categorize Boko Haram as a Terrorist organization? Because that would mean cutting off money to states that protect and harbor Terrorists and because Gilbert Chagoury contributed Millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. Exactly how many Millions of dollars is not known specifically but thanks to WikiLeaks we know that it is up to and including $5,000,000. Now Boko Haram flies the Black Flag of ISIS. Isn’t it curious that the Terrorist organization that the Obama/Clinton Regime created by making a power vacuum and running guns out of Benghazi and into Syria to fight their proxy war with Assad has now also been joined by Boko Haram in order to make a super-Caliphate?

It’s almost as though Nigeria is using Boko Haram as a KKK like Military in order to oppress Christianity in Africa so that Africans can be Terrorized into agreeing with a singular authority. Also Boko Haram means (Western Knowledge is Forbidden) and Islam doesn’t believe that women should be educated.

Shared State Law of Communication

Communication

Understanding

Agreement

Participation

Relationship is an approaching, and how we communicate is how we approach Relationship. Our Actions and our Words are informed by our Thoughts, and our Gestalt or Worldview (Soul) informs that. Why does communication Exist? How does communication create Value? The Reasonable Man uses Socratic Dialogue, Hegelian Dialectic, & Grice’s Maxims. When a person deviates from Rational Dialogue it creates an Implicature which leaks clues not only to their World View but how they are in Relationship with the world and with Relationship itself.

If a person is Communicating but not to be Understood, that isn’t Rational. That is a corruption of Communication. The person doing so wants the benefits of Relationship but they aren’t open to an Equal or Honest Relationship. Why would a person want to be in Relationship but not be Known, as they are, in their suchness? Is the person…

Christopher Hitchens in his book Rights of Man falsifies himself in a way. The book is about the contribution of one Thomas Payne to the American Revolution & French Revolution and his transition from Atheist to Deist. Payne blamed Atheism for the violence of the French Revolution that almost got him killed and as he helped foment the American Revolution he wanted it to be guided by the God of Reason.

“If God didn’t exist it would be necessary to invent him.” ~Voltaire

I propose a Challenge for Atheists, make a positive, falsifiable, specific, assertion supported with Reason and Evidence as to why human beings should have Inalienable Rights. And before you attempt to suggest that humans possess Innate Morality please explain the existence of that morality without the exertion of a moralizing force upon ourselves in the form of Religion. Please remember that Homo Naledi carried the bodies of their dead…

Lynn Marie Le asked me why I am called “The Destroyer of Worlds”. There are a lot of reasons, my online handle for years has been Shivah Solomon. My handle, which is also my spiritual name, means Death and Peace. There is no peace until their is death, but it is a metaphorical death, a philosophical death, the death of ignorance, of delusion. Shiva is the Hindu god of death.

“The soul is, in a way, phenomena.”

~Aristotle

In my philosophy a person’s soul, is their world, or the world as they understand it, it is their ontology, but their are hidden subjects, a person is aware of phenomena and we can all see phenomena, but the meaning of the phenomena is different for every person. I might use a sword or a scissors or a chopsticks completely different than they would. Their relationship with the phenomena is…

As far as I’m concerned Newt Gingrich destroyed Megyn Kelly in this interview. I have no clue why she would wear such an obvious catsuit it’s disgusting. Newt Gingrich not only exposed Megyn Kelly he destroyed her utterly. It’s so obvious to me that Megyn Kelly has been using sex appeal in order to expand her brand for a long time and she’s just not that good. As far as I am concerned there’s nothing wrong with sex but using manipulating the feminine voice of Western Society for your own benefit , It just disgusts me.