International Affairs Symposium Challenges the Status Quo

Washington Post columnist David Ignatius and national security commentator Max Boot square off in front of a full house at the 2016 International Affairs Symposium.

Lewis & Clark’s 57thInternational Affairs Symposiumkicks off on Monday, April 8 and will run through Wednesday, April 10. TitledChallenges to the Status Quo: A System Unraveling?, the symposium explores the forces that are defying widely accepted norms and institutions worldwide,from nuclear disarmament and private military contractors to the universality of human rights and the agendas of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).

As the oldest student-run symposium in the country, this event has been nationally acclaimed byThe Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, andThe Chronicle of Higher Education. This year, the event is cochaired by international affairs majorsNejra Gradan BA ’19 and Emina Ema IbisevićBA ’19, both hailing from Bosnia and Herzegovina. They are supported by a steering committee, comprised of 12 students from a multitude of countries and representing a variety of academic disciplines.

With so-called populist movements challenging the status quo worldwide, Monday evening’s keynote debate will focus on recent populist uprisings and the crisis of representation within democratic systems and institutions. The debate, titled “The Populist Disruption: Make Democracy Great Again,” will featureYascha Mounk, a political analyst andleading expert on the crisis of liberal democracy and the rise of populism, andRichard Morales,an executive counselor and former presidential candidate for Frente Amplio por la Democracia (FAD), a political party in Panama. Mounk will argue that while democracy may be flawed, the system can be fixed;Morales brings perspective on what it is like to participate in the populist movements being debated and advocates for radical change.

Although the debate topics are meant to be controversial, the committee aims to inspire constructive and productive conversations, both within the debate and across campus.

“There were many different experiences that [committee members] brought into the conversation,” Gradan said. “A lot of the things we talked about related to the countries they are from or some kind of personal experience. That really contributed to the quality of the topics that we decided to go forward with in the end.”

While sponsored by theinternational affairs department, the symposium aims to appeal to a wide audience across different disciplines with debates relating to the environment, economics, and sociology. “We tried to broaden what people see as international affairs because it isn’t only security, it isn’t only theories—there’s so much more than that,” Ibisevićsaid.

“We don’t want to simply give people answers,” Gradan said. “The point of exposing our audience to two different points of view is so they can leave that session and think about it at home, and use what they know about that topic and what they heard to create their own opinion.”