What Are They, Really?

Hall of Life—Human Exhibits

Ardipithecus

Australopithecines

This is a group of extinct apes. Although often portrayed otherwise, australopithecines had obviously
ape skulls, pelvises, hands, and feet.

Australopithecus afarensis (Lucy)

Paleoanthropologists Jack Stern and Randall Sussman have reported that Lucy’s hands are “surprisingly
similar to hands found in the small end of the pygmy chimpanzee-common chimpanzee range.”
They report that the feet, like the hands, are “long, curved and heavily muscled” much like those of
living tree-dwelling primates. The authors conclude that no living primate has such hands and feet
“for any purpose other than to meet the demands of full or part-time arboreal (tree-dwelling) life.”
(American Journal of Physical Anthropology 60, 1983, pp. 279–317.)

A more recent report concludes that the australopithecine jaw closely resembles that of a gorilla. See
www.answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/lucy/farewell-to-lucy/.

Lucy exhibit at the Creation Museum. See creationmuseum.org for more details.

Cro-Magnon

Far from being “primitive,” Cro-Magnons were early relatives of ours, fully human. Living sometime
after the dispersion at Babel, this group of people knew how to build huts, make stone paving floors,
construct kilns, and bake pottery. They made tools out of bone, flint, ivory, antler, and wood. They
knew how to carve flutes of bone, make jewelry, and sew clothing. Their artwork (cave murals) was
“worthy of a place among the masterpieces of world art” (Encyclopedia Britannica, 15th ed., volume
5, p. 291).

Homo erectus

This was a group of our ancestors who used stone tools, made fire, buried their dead, carved rock into
figurines, built shelters, and even used watercraft. Of this taxon, Professor Marvin Lubenow (who has
studied the claims regarding human evolution for 30 years) writes:

When we compare the crania of Homo erectus with those of early Homo sapiens and Neanderthal,
the similarities are striking. My own conclusion is that Homo erectus and Neanderthal are
actually the same: Homo erectus is on the lower end, with regard to size, of a continuum that includes Homo erectus, early Homo sapiens, and Neanderthal. (Bones of Contention, Grand
Rapids: Baker, 2004, 2nd edition, p. 127.)

Homo ergaster

This was a name suggested for some East African Homo erectus fossils.

Laetoli footprints

These footprints, although linked with the australopithecines, actually belong to a human. According
to evolutionist R.H. Tuttle:

Strictly on the basis of the morphology of the G prints [prints found at a site labelled “G”],
their makers could be classified as Homo sp. because they are so similar to those of Homo
sapiens, but their early date would probably deter many paleoanthropologists from accepting
this assignment. I suspect that if the prints were undated, or if they had been given younger
dates, most experts would probably accept them as having been made by Homo … .

If the prints were produced by a small species of Australopithecus (southern ape) then we must
conclude that it had virtually human feet which … were used in a manner indistinguishable
from those of slowly walking humans. … The feet that produced the G trails are in no discernible
features transitional between the feet of apes … and those of Homo sapiens. They are like small
barefoot Homo sapiens. (M.D. Leakey and J.M. Harris, eds., LAETOLI—A Pliocene site in Northern
Tanzania. London: Clarendon Press, 1987, pp. 503–523.)

By Tim from Washington, D.C., United States of America [CC BY-SA 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Cast of the Laetoli footprints, on display in the Hall of Human Origins at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C.

Homo habilis

This is an invalid taxon composed of a mixture of several species, with most of the fossils belonging
to australopithecines, according to Professor Marvin Lubenow (see www.answersingenesis.org/hominids/fact-versus-fiction-the-recent-ethiopian-fossils/).

Neanderthal

Neanderthals were fully human. According to Neanderthal authority Erik Trinkaus:

Detailed comparisons of Neanderthal skeletal remains with those of modern humans have
shown that there is nothing in Neanderthal anatomy that conclusively indicates locomotor,
manipulative, intellectual, or linguistic abilities inferior to those of modern humans. (E. Trinkaus,
“Hard Times Among the Neanderthals,” Natural History87:10, p. 58.)

For more information, see www.answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/neanderthal/the-neandertals-our-worthy-ancestors/ and
www.answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/neanderthal/the-neandertals-our-worthy-ancestors-part-ii/.