National Socialism focuses less on the short term and more on the long term. Although to many the idea of exterminating people with unwanted genes sounds gruesome and is harmful in the short run, it is beneficial for future generations to live in a world without genetic diseases, without jewry, or communists. Now Hitler realized although he may get a bad impression and holocausting people of his current generation would not directly benefit him or his current generation he did this as a gift to the future generations who he may never see. Thus he was never selfish and his intentions were virtuous. My only wish is Americans would stop being short sighted and sympathize for their own generation and instead make sacrifices for the better of future generations much like selfless Hitler did.

At 2/7/2015 10:05:57 PM, dotheendsjustifythemeans wrote:National Socialism focuses less on the short term and more on the long term. Although to many the idea of exterminating people with unwanted genes sounds gruesome and is harmful in the short run, it is beneficial for future generations to live in a world without genetic diseases, without jewry, or communists. Now Hitler realized although he may get a bad impression and holocausting people of his current generation would not directly benefit him or his current generation he did this as a gift to the future generations who he may never see. Thus he was never selfish and his intentions were virtuous. My only wish is Americans would stop being short sighted and sympathize for their own generation and instead make sacrifices for the better of future generations much like selfless Hitler did.

Doesn't fancy gene therapy techniques and being able to be more selective over embryos and stuff destroy the point of the more crude forms of eugenics that Hitler used?

I'm all for eugenics but with gene manipulation being what it is and improving everyday, it seems like a process that will naturally occur anyway.

At 2/7/2015 10:05:57 PM, dotheendsjustifythemeans wrote:National Socialism focuses less on the short term and more on the long term. Although to many the idea of exterminating people with unwanted genes sounds gruesome and is harmful in the short run, it is beneficial for future generations to live in a world without genetic diseases, without jewry, or communists. Now Hitler realized although he may get a bad impression and holocausting people of his current generation would not directly benefit him or his current generation he did this as a gift to the future generations who he may never see. Thus he was never selfish and his intentions were virtuous. My only wish is Americans would stop being short sighted and sympathize for their own generation and instead make sacrifices for the better of future generations much like selfless Hitler did.

On your profile it says you will holocaust the Jews and then Holocaust them again but how can you holocaust them twice?

At 2/7/2015 10:05:57 PM, dotheendsjustifythemeans wrote:National Socialism focuses less on the short term and more on the long term. Although to many the idea of exterminating people with unwanted genes sounds gruesome and is harmful in the short run, it is beneficial for future generations to live in a world without genetic diseases, without jewry, or communists. Now Hitler realized although he may get a bad impression and holocausting people of his current generation would not directly benefit him or his current generation he did this as a gift to the future generations who he may never see. Thus he was never selfish and his intentions were virtuous. My only wish is Americans would stop being short sighted and sympathize for their own generation and instead make sacrifices for the better of future generations much like selfless Hitler did.

Doesn't fancy gene therapy techniques and being able to be more selective over embryos and stuff destroy the point of the more crude forms of eugenics that Hitler used?

I'm all for eugenics but with gene manipulation being what it is and improving everyday, it seems like a process that will naturally occur anyway.

you must realize gene therapy was not possible in Hitler's time. ALthough quite recently i've been debating if that is today's best solution. On one side it'll meet less resistance but it means supplies will be fed to disabled when it could be a surplus to encourage newborns without genetic problems to be reborn. And if we don't give the surplus needed for those newborns to have life then, we deny them the right to exist and we have killed them off for the sake of disabled people. On the other side it's less gruesome and will meet less resistance. So i'm undecided

At 2/7/2015 10:05:57 PM, dotheendsjustifythemeans wrote:National Socialism focuses less on the short term and more on the long term. Although to many the idea of exterminating people with unwanted genes sounds gruesome and is harmful in the short run, it is beneficial for future generations to live in a world without genetic diseases, without jewry, or communists. Now Hitler realized although he may get a bad impression and holocausting people of his current generation would not directly benefit him or his current generation he did this as a gift to the future generations who he may never see. Thus he was never selfish and his intentions were virtuous. My only wish is Americans would stop being short sighted and sympathize for their own generation and instead make sacrifices for the better of future generations much like selfless Hitler did.

On your profile it says you will holocaust the Jews and then Holocaust them again but how can you holocaust them twice?

I mean bring them back alive and rekill them. Ofc i'm joking cause that's not possible but if that was i'd put them through that misery again

At 2/7/2015 10:05:57 PM, dotheendsjustifythemeans wrote:National Socialism focuses less on the short term and more on the long term. Although to many the idea of exterminating people with unwanted genes sounds gruesome and is harmful in the short run, it is beneficial for future generations to live in a world without genetic diseases, without jewry, or communists. Now Hitler realized although he may get a bad impression and holocausting people of his current generation would not directly benefit him or his current generation he did this as a gift to the future generations who he may never see. Thus he was never selfish and his intentions were virtuous. My only wish is Americans would stop being short sighted and sympathize for their own generation and instead make sacrifices for the better of future generations much like selfless Hitler did.

Selfless Hitler who didn't listen to his generals when they told him he should have given up because he was always right.

As long as you support dictatorship, you are worried about some sort of class conflict. You are worried about reprisals resulting from the way you implement policies.

Dictatorship allows one person to ignore the wishes of everyone else. If you define "best" as "most exploitative" or "least fair" or "most self-centered", I suppose that dictatorship would be the best system.

At 2/7/2015 10:05:57 PM, dotheendsjustifythemeans wrote:National Socialism focuses less on the short term and more on the long term. Although to many the idea of exterminating people with unwanted genes sounds gruesome and is harmful in the short run, it is beneficial for future generations to live in a world without genetic diseases, without jewry, or communists. Now Hitler realized although he may get a bad impression and holocausting people of his current generation would not directly benefit him or his current generation he did this as a gift to the future generations who he may never see. Thus he was never selfish and his intentions were virtuous. My only wish is Americans would stop being short sighted and sympathize for their own generation and instead make sacrifices for the better of future generations much like selfless Hitler did.

Selfless Hitler who didn't listen to his generals when they told him he should have given up because he was always right.

As long as you support dictatorship, you are worried about some sort of class conflict. You are worried about reprisals resulting from the way you implement policies.

Dictatorship allows one person to ignore the wishes of everyone else. If you define "best" as "most exploitative" or "least fair" or "most self-centered", I suppose that dictatorship would be the best system.

weimar republic run by socialist democrats did nothing to solve https://www.youtube.com...only hitler deal with those jewish communist scums

At 2/7/2015 10:05:57 PM, dotheendsjustifythemeans wrote:National Socialism focuses less on the short term and more on the long term. Although to many the idea of exterminating people with unwanted genes sounds gruesome and is harmful in the short run, it is beneficial for future generations to live in a world without genetic diseases, without jewry, or communists. Now Hitler realized although he may get a bad impression and holocausting people of his current generation would not directly benefit him or his current generation he did this as a gift to the future generations who he may never see. Thus he was never selfish and his intentions were virtuous. My only wish is Americans would stop being short sighted and sympathize for their own generation and instead make sacrifices for the better of future generations much like selfless Hitler did.

Selfless Hitler who didn't listen to his generals when they told him he should have given up because he was always right.

As long as you support dictatorship, you are worried about some sort of class conflict. You are worried about reprisals resulting from the way you implement policies.

Dictatorship allows one person to ignore the wishes of everyone else. If you define "best" as "most exploitative" or "least fair" or "most self-centered", I suppose that dictatorship would be the best system.

weimar republic run by socialist democrats did nothing to solve https://www.youtube.com...only hitler deal with those jewish communist scums

Yes, Hitler dealt with everything quite nicely. His country was ridiculed, annexed, destroyed from two fronts, fined massively, and all because he thought he could get away with invading all of Europe and cleansing the place. He was clearly out of touch with reality if he thought he could realistically pull such a thing off. He'd have to somehow govern the entire world to ensure his eugenics succeeded. The concept of taking over the entire world with one country's army is utterly ridiculous.

The Weimar Republic was corrupt and destitute, but its leaders were not nearly as stupid.

At 2/7/2015 10:05:57 PM, dotheendsjustifythemeans wrote:National Socialism focuses less on the short term and more on the long term. Although to many the idea of exterminating people with unwanted genes sounds gruesome and is harmful in the short run, it is beneficial for future generations to live in a world without genetic diseases, without jewry, or communists. Now Hitler realized although he may get a bad impression and holocausting people of his current generation would not directly benefit him or his current generation he did this as a gift to the future generations who he may never see. Thus he was never selfish and his intentions were virtuous. My only wish is Americans would stop being short sighted and sympathize for their own generation and instead make sacrifices for the better of future generations much like selfless Hitler did.

Selfless Hitler who didn't listen to his generals when they told him he should have given up because he was always right.

As long as you support dictatorship, you are worried about some sort of class conflict. You are worried about reprisals resulting from the way you implement policies.

Dictatorship allows one person to ignore the wishes of everyone else. If you define "best" as "most exploitative" or "least fair" or "most self-centered", I suppose that dictatorship would be the best system.

weimar republic run by socialist democrats did nothing to solve https://www.youtube.com...only hitler deal with those jewish communist scums

Yes, Hitler dealt with everything quite nicely. His country was ridiculed, annexed, destroyed from two fronts, fined massively, and all because he thought he could get away with invading all of Europe and cleansing the place. He was clearly out of touch with reality if he thought he could realistically pull such a thing off. He'd have to somehow govern the entire world to ensure his eugenics succeeded. The concept of taking over the entire world with one country's army is utterly ridiculous.

The Weimar Republic was corrupt and destitute, but its leaders were not nearly as stupid.

It was japan's fault for declaring war on the usa. Germany would be fine otherwise. Taking over the whole world is not ridiculous, it's achievable so long as japan doesn't mess things up. Weimar Republic is short sighted

I've decided to apply my knowledge of biology to make Aryans look inferior:

Less melanin is worse because less melanin means less of a safeguard of the skin against sunlight UV radiation. Humans need safeguards against UV radiation. Those with the most melanin are the most superior.

Therefore, Aryans are inferior and should be swept out of the gene pool. The blond hair of Aryans also gets on my nerves, and because I am a great person, you should respect everything I tell you regardless of whatever else you hear. I have the true national interests of Zimbabwe in mind. Remember how great Zimbabwe was in the distant past? Clearly that is a testament to Zimbabwe's superiority!

Republicans piss me off, too. They and the Aryans are part of a global conspiracy, because they're mostly rich.

Of course, in the short-term many Aryans and Republicans will have to die. Later on though, humankind will be united under Great Zimbabwe and will be composed of those with the advantage of high levels of UV protection. No one will have to spend money on sunblock ever again.