3
Elements of Responsible Reform Increase the State Commitment to Education Limit the Local Share of Education Costs Strengthen the EPS model of Funding by Including Special Education & Transportation Provide Incentives for Efficient Delivery of Education Services Increase the State Commitment to Education Limit the Local Share of Education Costs Strengthen the EPS model of Funding by Including Special Education & Transportation Provide Incentives for Efficient Delivery of Education Services

5
Increase General Purpose Aid to Education for FY05 by $25 Million Expand The Property Tax Circuit Breaker Program & Increase Funding for FY05 by $25 Million Increase General Purpose Aid to Education for FY05 by $25 Million Expand The Property Tax Circuit Breaker Program & Increase Funding for FY05 by $25 Million Immediate, Targeted Property Tax Relief

6
Increase the State Share of Education Costs to 55% by FY09-10 Limit the Local Share of All EPS Defined Education Costs to 8.0 Mills or Less by FY09-10 Strengthen the EPS Model of Funding by Including Special Education & Transportation Provide Incentives for Efficient Delivery of Education Services Limit Spending at All Levels of Government Increase the State Share of Education Costs to 55% by FY09-10 Limit the Local Share of All EPS Defined Education Costs to 8.0 Mills or Less by FY09-10 Strengthen the EPS Model of Funding by Including Special Education & Transportation Provide Incentives for Efficient Delivery of Education Services Limit Spending at All Levels of Government Longer-Term Property Tax Relief

8
Increase General Purpose Aid to Education by $25 Million for FY05  Current FY05 Budgeted Amount of $725,410,576 is Increased to $750,410,576  Result: An Additional $14,986,616 for Operating and Program Cost Distribution Over Commissioner’s Current RFL Increase General Purpose Aid to Education by $25 Million for FY05  Current FY05 Budgeted Amount of $725,410,576 is Increased to $750,410,576  Result: An Additional $14,986,616 for Operating and Program Cost Distribution Over Commissioner’s Current RFL Key Education Components

9
Increase State Share of Education Costs to 55% by FY09-10  Provide the Increased State Share each Year Over the Specified Five-Year Period Necessary to Achieve the Statutorily Required 55% by FY2009-10  The Bill Does not Alter the Current Law Phase-in of EPS but Will Require Additional State Share Each Year to Meet the FY2009-10 Required 55% Increase State Share of Education Costs to 55% by FY09-10  Provide the Increased State Share each Year Over the Specified Five-Year Period Necessary to Achieve the Statutorily Required 55% by FY2009-10  The Bill Does not Alter the Current Law Phase-in of EPS but Will Require Additional State Share Each Year to Meet the FY2009-10 Required 55% Key Education Components

10
Limit the Local Share of All EPS Defined Education Costs to 8.0 Mills or Less by FY2009-10  Establishes a New Method of Distribution for the State Share of Education Funding  Ensures That a Municipality, Single or Part of an SAU Will Not Be Required to Raise More Than 8.0 Mills of State Valuation for Their Share of Local Education Costs by FY2009-10  State Share Becomes the Difference Between the Established Mill Rate Expectation and the EPS Defined Costs Each Year Limit the Local Share of All EPS Defined Education Costs to 8.0 Mills or Less by FY2009-10  Establishes a New Method of Distribution for the State Share of Education Funding  Ensures That a Municipality, Single or Part of an SAU Will Not Be Required to Raise More Than 8.0 Mills of State Valuation for Their Share of Local Education Costs by FY2009-10  State Share Becomes the Difference Between the Established Mill Rate Expectation and the EPS Defined Costs Each Year Key Education Components

12
Strengthen the EPS Model of Funding by Including Special Education & Transportation  Transportation Model Enacted This Session With Refinements Before Implementation of EPS FY06  Special Education Program Changes Now With Fiscal Reform to Be Enacted Next Session Before Implementation of EPS in FY2005-06  Continue to Guide EPS Development With the Adequacy and Equity Goal for All Students Strengthen the EPS Model of Funding by Including Special Education & Transportation  Transportation Model Enacted This Session With Refinements Before Implementation of EPS FY06  Special Education Program Changes Now With Fiscal Reform to Be Enacted Next Session Before Implementation of EPS in FY2005-06  Continue to Guide EPS Development With the Adequacy and Equity Goal for All Students Key Education Components

14
Existing Efficient, High Performing School Units That Agree to Mentor Others Qualify for:  Under 1,000 Students  5% GPA Bonus for 5 Years  State Assumes 25% of Local Construction Debt  1,000 to 2,500 Students  7.5% GPA Bonus for 5 Years  State Assumes 25% of Local Construction Debt  2,500 + Students  10% GPA Bonus for 5 Years  State Assumes 50% of Local Construction Debt Existing Efficient, High Performing School Units That Agree to Mentor Others Qualify for:  Under 1,000 Students  5% GPA Bonus for 5 Years  State Assumes 25% of Local Construction Debt  1,000 to 2,500 Students  7.5% GPA Bonus for 5 Years  State Assumes 25% of Local Construction Debt  2,500 + Students  10% GPA Bonus for 5 Years  State Assumes 50% of Local Construction Debt Efficient School Units

15
Five + School Administrative Units w/ Combined Enrollment of 2500+ That Agree to Cooperate in the Delivery of Administrative and Other Services  Salary and Benefits for One FTE Regional Staff  Declining Scale for Five Years  Additional 25% Tuition Reimbursement  Graduate Courses  State Purchase of Region-Wide Software  State Provides Technical Assistance and Training  State Grant Programs Favor RCs Five + School Administrative Units w/ Combined Enrollment of 2500+ That Agree to Cooperate in the Delivery of Administrative and Other Services  Salary and Benefits for One FTE Regional Staff  Declining Scale for Five Years  Additional 25% Tuition Reimbursement  Graduate Courses  State Purchase of Region-Wide Software  State Provides Technical Assistance and Training  State Grant Programs Favor RCs Regional School Cooperatives

16
Combine Two or More Contiguous School Administrative Units Adopt 1 Governing Body, 1 Budget  1,000-2,500 Students  7.5% GPA Bonus for 5 Years  State Assumes 25% of Local Construction Debt  2,500 + Students  10% GPA Bonus for 5 Years  State Assumes 50% of Local Construction debt Combine Two or More Contiguous School Administrative Units Adopt 1 Governing Body, 1 Budget  1,000-2,500 Students  7.5% GPA Bonus for 5 Years  State Assumes 25% of Local Construction Debt  2,500 + Students  10% GPA Bonus for 5 Years  State Assumes 50% of Local Construction debt Regional School Districts

19
Limit Spending for Municipal and County Budgets  Modeled on Current State Cap  Cap is 4.67% for FY2006-07 and 5.17% for FY2007-08 Limit Spending for Municipal and County Budgets  Modeled on Current State Cap  Cap is 4.67% for FY2006-07 and 5.17% for FY2007-08 Limit Government Spending

20
Repeal Personal Property Tax on Machinery and Equipment  Repeal Effective April 1, 2004  BETR qualified Equipment Becomes Tax Exempt as it Exits The BETR Program  Towns reimbursed 50%  State Savings of $3.7 Million in FY2007 and $11.0 Million in FY2008 Repeal Personal Property Tax on Machinery and Equipment  Repeal Effective April 1, 2004  BETR qualified Equipment Becomes Tax Exempt as it Exits The BETR Program  Towns reimbursed 50%  State Savings of $3.7 Million in FY2007 and $11.0 Million in FY2008 Competitiveness

21
Why Focus on Tax Relief ? Tax Burden 20% Above US and Among the Highest in the US for a Decade Property Tax Burden Among the Highest in the Nation Two Citizens’ Initiatives Demanding Property Tax Relief Maine’s High Tax Burden Weakens Our Competitive Position Tax Burden 20% Above US and Among the Highest in the US for a Decade Property Tax Burden Among the Highest in the Nation Two Citizens’ Initiatives Demanding Property Tax Relief Maine’s High Tax Burden Weakens Our Competitive Position

24
Why Focus on Competitiveness ? Per Capita Income 10% Below US 1/3 of Jobs Do Not Pay Livable Wage Industrial Productivity 70% of US Lost 1/3 Manufacturing Jobs Since 1989 Cost of Doing Business 10% Above US Our Manufacturing Job Loss Much Worse Than US Per Capita Income 10% Below US 1/3 of Jobs Do Not Pay Livable Wage Industrial Productivity 70% of US Lost 1/3 Manufacturing Jobs Since 1989 Cost of Doing Business 10% Above US Our Manufacturing Job Loss Much Worse Than US

30
Why Focus on Education Spending? Largest Part of State and Local Budgets Expenditures Increasing Rapidly Enrollments Are Declining Rapidly Largest Part of State and Local Budgets Expenditures Increasing Rapidly Enrollments Are Declining Rapidly