Stats

Eye color: brown

Hair color: brown

Height: 5'5"

Weight: 106 lbs

Breasts: small

Size: 35/23/35

Shaved: shaved

Ethnicity: Caucasian

Bio

You'll be surprised, but I love insects. I am an entomologist. So summer is my favorite time of year. I can watch the insects in nature and do sketches. At home I live with a tarantula spider and mantis. I also love Japanese poetry. The Japanese understand the music of cicadas singing candles and enjoy the lights of fireflies.

59 Members commented on Eliav's gallery

The word "cunt" with regard to a woman has absolutely no place if you are trying to be respectful to the woman. It is considered to be demeaning and any logic that it is appropriate, is just a weird and bizarre attempt to justify it's use.
Am I late on this argument?...........yes I am...........do I care?.....not at all. Had to put my two cents in. Eliav is gorgeous as always.

Sorry hotte I disagree intensely about the word cunt and whore being completely synonymous. I am English and went to a public school, I learnt one devil of a load of foul language and slang not only there but afterwards as well. Sorry chum but in England refering to a girl as having a beautiful cunt is Not an insult. Calling somebody a cunt whether male or female damn well is and you take the consequences. To be honest in England refering to a girl's pussy could seem effeminate but MetArt is an American site so I adhere to the norm.
Incidentally the word cunnilingus is from Latin and cunt is Germanic.

What an extraordinarily beautiful young woman! This girl was born to enchant. She is visually perfect and I would have a hard time believing that she would be anything but the gentle slightly shy vision I see in these photos. IMO this is a true Met model in every sense. She epitomizes my idea of feminine beauty.

Please K, put this lovely thing on the A list and bring us lots more. I think she and Albert are a match made in heaven!

White panties and bra! Thank you for my favorite outfit! Eliav is spectacular, What a lovely body and getting to see her in her undies slowly removing them for us is a treat for sure. Once naked she is magnificent! I can't see growing tired of this lovely damsel for a very long time.

If you insist on "dabbling" with them, you're taking yourself down to the level of the morons that are posting them and providing them the amusement they seek... Your visits here will be much more pleasant if you just pretend they don't exist...;o)

I believe that is the point.
"Fraulein" is the diminutive of "Frau" ~ the implication being, you are talking down to her.
Same with "girl" as a form of address or designation when one is speaking of a fully grown woman. Or, one who wishes to be considered such: address a high-schooler as a girl, and see how happy she is with you...

I examined some of the arguments and points on that website you suggested Rachsback, and some very interesting points are made. The origin of the semantics of the word 'cunt' being among the most interesting. I've complained on several occasions about this tag being used and specifically why Met Art includes it as an 'available' tag. (It can't be included as a comment if its not among the list, we all should know that fact by now).

I do respect your point of view, NOW, as well as the justifications made on the site; however, unfortunately the term 'cunt' in the 21st century, and recently, is associated synonomously with the term 'whore'; I don't think anyone can deny that fact. Therefore, it should not be INCLUDED as an available tag by Met Art, (as the term'whore' is not); because by today's norms and standards, both are considered highly offensive to women. None of these models, who have chosen to provide us with the GIFT of viewing their beasutiful bodies DESERVED THAT! When we're all more enlightened by similar campaigns and websites such as http:??cherishthecunt.com, then maybe yes. I also do not think it is fair to British people to suggest that it is a common acceptance; not so!

"both are considered highly offensive to women.".... I think you'll find that depends entirely on the women you're talking to. Also, I'm pretty sure the new models are told to ignore the "tags" and to read only the comments...if they read anything here at all! I'm also sure that a lot of them do not.

It might be offensive in a culture that is so uncomfortable with sexuality that women raise their sons with the word "dinger" because they can't bring themselves to say "penis". Lol. I suppose that would make that word I can't bring myself to type a "bell", wouldn't it? Then I guess we could have "Ringing the Church Bells".

Rock and Magwich, I am not sure what world y'all are living in... LOL
By the way, I'm not making this statement to be argumentative, but simply to give you my two cent's worth... and please feel perfectly free to disregard if this is not representative of your experience.
However, in the world I live in, just about any woman I used the term "cunt" with, either in conversation or as a form of address, would be quite offended (and I am not "upper class" nor are my family and friends).
In my humble judgment, the term "cunt" has almost always been used as an insulting, degrading term, not only for the woman's genitalia, but for the woman who possesses those genitalia. Just because we're in the 21st C. does not mean the term has suddenly lost its offensiveness.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
....just out of curiosity, has either of you used the term in conversation with a woman, or ever called a woman that term? Were they in the least offended or annoyed, or did they react differently?

We are in the world of the comment section of an erotic photography site. If we wish to communicate at all we have no choice but to use lots of language that I, at least, wouldn't use elsewhere. I won't be commenting on the outline of any Grande Bellezza at the high school graduation party I will be attending soon.

The question presented has never been whether is it usually considered rude in general, but whether HERE, as a DESCRIPTIVE noun, it is insulting to NUDE MODELS.

There is no purpose in forming a judgement, humble or otherwise, on a topic that has been well studied. The wikipedia article is not bad (as of today). Instead of asking whether it has lost its offensiveness, I would suggest asking when, where, and why it acquired offensiveness in the first place. It seems to be considered most offensive in the US, and in particular our own Midwest. We should not assume native usage in our own small repressed neck of the woods has any relevance to the lingua franca of the entire world.

So here is my take. This is the one word in the English language that clearly applies to the entirety of female genitalia. Any acceptance or belief that the word itself is offensive to women is bizarre.

The human form is beautiful in its entirety. We ought to be able to discuss it free from weird hang ups.

"Any acceptance or belief that the word itself is offensive to women is bizarre."
...IS offensive, ....or SHOULD BE offensive?
If you are arguing the first, I must ~ respectfully ~ disagree. I maintain that ~ outside the adult/erotica and sex industries, the use of the term "cunt" is seen as highly offensive.
If I am wrong and you have actually used this term with women in various milieus and they were not offended, please do inform me.
If you want to argue the second, I would be willing to concede the point, without necessarily agreeing.
I do agree that indeed, there SHOULD be an unoffensive term for the female genitalia... in my experience the term that comes closest is "vagina." Does that not apply in your experience?

I am approaching the half century mark and have lived in and visited a fair number of places. I read and watch media in the English language of several cultures. I have learned an eye-popping, cheek reddening amount of slang from long association with public schools.

Not once, not ever, have I known the word "cunt" to be used synonymously with the word "whore". So I do, in fact, deny what you say is "that fact". I suppose it therefore follows from your statement that I (as well a significant proportion of Ireland, apparently) do not qualify as "anyone".

What I am hearing is that any word in the English language that refers directly to this particular part of the body is offensive to women. Unless it is slang, metaphor, euphemism, or allusion.

If this were a court applying the English Common Law, I would seek a writ of quo warranto demanding to know what authority grants the right to define "today's norms and standards" for every single one of the billion plus users of English on the planet.

Pardon me for being crass; however, I need to ask why it is that almost every user tag area for Met-Art models contains the tag "cunt." Is there an area of Met-Art where feminine reproductive parts are scarce? Is the poster calling the model such a name? Is the word used as a code or marker to find favorite models? I'm at a loss.

Other than this little rant, Eliav is a hottie and I hope to see more.

I completely agree, Baggy, Magwich's name MUST be incorporated into the alliteration award somehow... I'm at a loss as to how, not being an accomplished practitioner of that fine art, myself... ( ; We'll have to ponder on it.
~~~~
Yes, Magwich, please give us an update on your study of the theory of thong? (I'm sure everyone is pretty sick and tired of hearing my ideas on the proper role of panties in erotic photography ~ LOL)

P.S.
Not always the fashion, especially today, it gives the woman a beauty more.
Often escapes to the woman a little beauty.
Photo # 11 you think to that beautiful woman's hand with natural nails or with a bright red nail polish. You think .... You think