Saged, reported, hidden, called the cops, called the Fire Department, called pizza hut, called the USN, called the Royal Navy, called the Red Army, called the FBI. called the CIA, called Interpol, called the KGB, called the USMC, called the USAF, called the Royal Air force, called MI 6, called Scotland Yard, called the US National Guard of every state, called NYPD, called Obama, called the Queen, called Putin, called David Cameron, called every Governor of every US State, used my time phone to call Winston Church hill, As well as Hitler, Stalin, Theodore Roosevelt, George Washington, Montezuma, ever Caesar, and Gilgamesh, called US Army, called British Army in every era, called every phone sexline, called papa john's, called the US Coast Guard, called my State Senators, called my Senators, called every republican in the US, called Dr. Who, called the Pope, called my local Gang lords, called the State Patrol of ever state west of the Mississippi, called all of my local news channels, called Star Fleet, called The Sun, called The national enquirer, called CNN, called Scot Pelly, called Steven Colbert, called half of the Mexican Drug Cartels, called Nintendo, called the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force, called the head of the Illuminati, called ever free mason, called bilderberg, called my neighbors, called the mayor of ever city in France, called my mom, called the Emperor of Man, and called every school district in Canada.

Saged doesn't add as much to the humor, especially given how many people on 4chan don't know the purpose of saging, so it's not an uncommon sight to see someone saging in a thread just because they don't like it. Anyway, har har at you losing your patience for going on in this dumb debate.

P.S. Autism isn't putting effort into something for more than five minutes or criticizing something.

And it's not even a debate, I just find it completely dumb that you're even pointing out that saged is in the copy pasta itself, which was most likely written for the purpose to be posted in an image board.

The fact that it was posted here doesn't matter. It's a copy pasta, not something I wrote myself. I"m not just gonna edit it because saged is out of place.

Ironically, according to Adspam's definition of ban-worthy material it has to be, and I quote, "...Anything resembling a human under the age of 18. Cartoons, CGI, and real life pictures count. Any violation of this rule will result in an instant ban."
Your image right there has a character resembling a human under the age of 18, and thus, is in violation of Adsman's rules.

If you read the wording, it doesn't specify that the image has to be ************, it says "anything". This means that it applies to **** and SFW images. So, according to that rule, if your image was posted in ****, it would be in violation of the rule. But if the image is bannable under the **** section, why wouldn't that restriction also carry over to SFW? I mean, if even **** doesn't allow it, why would SFW allow it?

I understand the intention quite well, but the words still specify that it applies to "ANYTHING". This is not a loophole, this is a strict limit, it leaves nothing to interpretation, and it clearly defines the restriction.

It's LITERALLY as simple as changing the word "anything" to "************ images".

You can be as pissy as you want about my pointing this out, but it will not change the definition of the restriction, which is absolute in this instance.

A person can infer all day, but the truth of the matter is, simple clarification could solve many problems. However, adsphlegm was in a hurry and was afraid he was going to lose money, so he just worded it such that it would apply all around. People read the rule, and some see it as I see it. A completely ludicrous rule, that, when applied, affects more aspects of this site than just one.
Because of the broadness which the restriction applies, it makes properly enforcing the rule difficult, as well.
It was even worse, because originally, the rule stated that you couldn't post anything that appeared to be under the age of 18, this wording got the attention of the brony board in a really hurry.
As for that **** - Not Safe For Work heading, it's been there for a long time, certainly longer than the underage restriction sub-heading. Its original purpose was not about what NOT to post, it was merely informing users that the board could potential contain ************ material.

Third time's the charm?
Actually, what I said was, "It's all there, black and white, clear as crystal." I already did say that I understood the intent, but intent is not how this planet works. According to literature, it defines the questionable content as "anything under the age of 18" our separation of titles, sentences, and headers makes this so. And without understanding of the intention beforehand, this definition, when interpreted literally, leaves no grey-area.
I assume the "intention and inference" factor, is one of the unanticipated byproducts of adsperm's decision to select 2-year+ old users, the fact that older users know admin from the old days, and have a clearer understanding of what he is looking for.
Unfortunately, because humans are the way they are, this can also leave a lot of wiggle room for the new mods to bend the rules to their will a little, and can abuse their privileges, based on this literal definition, as the wording is clearly defined.

You can call me wrong until you're purple, and I still won't care about your silly inferences. It doesn't change how simple this could be to amend.

And the mods themselves have a specific set of rules and guidelines set by addy and themselves in which they are allowed to flagban. If they abuse their powers, they're removed from their position as quick as possible.

If that's what you're worried about, you're kind of worrying about nothing.

I worry about it about as much as Gordon Freeman worries about his trusty crowbar.

I'm just having fun pointing out that eventually, someone out there IS going to take some advantage of this, it's inevitable. Such is the way of humanity.
And as far as all the inferences and specificity goes, I have seen people banned for posting regular, non-cp porn in **** sections. I've seen people banned for uploading porn to the newest uploads, and they have never uploaded anything before, ever. I've seen addy personally ban people, simply because he felt like banning them.
I've also always seen addy mass-unban all of them in the end, whether they've actually broken rules or not.