I now feel compelled to open yet another thread concerning the ongoing efforts to discredit the September Clues findings. Many of you will already be aware of all of this, but I just felt the need to open a dedicated thread to discuss and defuse the current wave of particularly lame, contorted and desperate attempts by self-anointed "cutting-edge 9/11 researchers" - such as:

ALL of the above-listed entities are prominent "9/11 truthers" - in the eyes of thousands - or perhaps millions of people.

ALL of the above-mentioned entities are, in my honest opinion (matured over years of 9/11 research), united in a common effort to act as 'credible supporters' of the 9/11 inside-job paradigm - while protecting (each one of them in their own way) the very crux of the whole affair:the corporate news media's central role and connivence with the 9/11 scam.

ALL of the above-mentioned entities are fully aware of the September Clues research. In fact, MOST of them have, at some stage in time, strongly supported / championed / hugged-up to the SC research - only to "change their minds" over time and discard/dismiss their initial backing of SC as an ill-pondered and temporary 'mistake of judgment'...

Here's a short and concise summary of those folks' antics:

Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson and Richard Hall, the Anglo-American "scientific trio"are ALL using the fake 9/11 imagery as a basis to formulate their "evidence" pointing to an inside-job. Judy Wood will have us believe that the ridiculous "dustification" of the WTC as seen on TV - was caused by top-secret, exotic and 'classified' directed-energy-weapons. Thus, the TV NETWORKS aired REAL images on 9/11. Richard Hall will have us believe that the airplanes were in fact holograms - projected by some military drone. Thus, according to Richard Hall (a self-confessed former engineer (?) with the UK TRIDENT PROGRAMME) - the TV NETWORKS aired REAL images on 9/11.

As conclusively demonstrated in our CGI COLLAPSE FOOTAGE thread, even the tower collapse imagery was created / prefabricated with cinematic special fx techniques - much like the buildings seen collapsing in Hollywood disaster-movies such as Independence Day (1996) and Armageddon(1998). In reality, the Twin Towers were demolished behind a military-grade smokescreen raised to hide the proceedings from public view.

Ace Baker(who emerged out of nowhere in 2007, soon after I published September Clues online) initially presented September Clues at a Jim Fetzer 9/11 conference - only to dismiss SC a few months later as "95% false" . He successively produced his slick "9/11 PsyOpera" - which essentially states that ONLY the airplanes were CGI - but the rest of the 9/11 imagery was quite REAL, Manhattan landscapes, tower collapses and all.

Jim Fetzer (who has championed the no-plane paradigm for years in his writings and radio shows - without ever mentioning SC as his main source of inspiration) is now fervently espousing Richard Hall's fancy "hologram theory". Thus, Fetzer is also saying that the 9/11 TV imagery was, after all, very REAL.

Phil Jayhan (who at some stage enthusiastically promoted September Clues) spends most of his time defending the authenticity of the 9/11 imagery and inventing ways of making people believe that they are REAL images. His "Let's Roll" forum now features an entire, 26-page thread dedicated to discredit yours truly, which includes Phil's 'acute' conclusion that I must be financed by the Bin Laden family... Phil's most hilarious attempt at protecting the news media imagery was when he proposed that the "9/11 jumpers seen jumping to their death" were, in fact, (very real) latex dummies!...Thus, the TV imagery was REAL, get it?

I'll skip mentioning what sort of antics Richard Gage and Alex Jones are up to - as I hope this will be self-evident by now.

Well, that's all folks - it's all a bit of a drag for me to keep up with the various clowns attacking the September Clues research - and I'm sure many would say it would be better to just ignore them. However, I feel that acknowledging their existence and exposing their silly antics is all part of the good fight to restore sanity on this planet.

The issue here, however, is that there seems to be reason enough to suggest that the anti-establishment-oriented self-importance of the host (and its general material) is more naive than nefarious.

Be whatever the case may, their programming has a tendency to send up many a red flag as pertains to disinformation, bias, shallow reporting and general ignorance---be it by design, cognitive dissonance or being educated beyond the scope of one's own capacity to think critically.

The issue here, however, is that there seems to be reason enough to suggest that the anti-establishment-oriented self-importance of the host (and its general material) is more naive than nefarious.

Be whatever the case may, their programming has a tendency to send up many a red flag as pertains to disinformation, bias, shallow reporting and general ignorance---be it by design, cognitive dissonance or being educated beyond the scope of one's own capacity to think critically.

Great example. Started out as an internet phenom saying all the right things and then ended up selling out to the 'Al Gore' channel for whatever reason.

Today I received this e-mail from ...(hold on to your seats) ... septemberclues.20.xyz1@spamgourmet.com !!!

WARNING: I would'nt try and check out the below links - I am only posting them to keep a record of this formidably crass and libelous maneuver to try and associate the September Clues research with the Khalezov clown.

And that's how the (unsigned) e-mail ends. No doubt, it has been sent all over the place - with the clear intent to make it appear that September Clues is somehow connected to the ridiculous Khalezov garbage.

Note: The DIMITRI KHALEZOV character is of course yet another NEWS MEDIA gatekeeping operation, since his entire "nuke demolition theory" is just a variant of Judy Wood's attempts to "scientifically explain" the absurd WTC collapse imagery.

I just added a comment under that kooky Kaku video, advertising my new business venture. If you like my idea - but can't afford investing in it - don't forget to at least give it a thumbs up ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfLx9EjHomc

That allegedly took place in Minneapolis. I lived in the area and had friends in the area where the crime supposedly took place when it supposedly took place and I heard nothing. Nor did it seem to be known or talked about by anyone I met at coffee shops even though nothing else was really going on at the time, and crime is usually discussed very openly and scornfully, and the stupidest news gossip spreads like wildfire. When I mentioned it to someone who lived a couple blocks away, they literally laughed and said, "Nope."

Another person was immediately suspicious of the Somali patsy. I was just suspicious of the name of Mister Zuhuhebeerrrr or whatever the fuck they jotted onto their fake case file.

It seemed to have been a story that disappeared as quickly as it appeared and been closely associated with some pathetic, cowardly arm of the police force that doesn't want to make waves. The police of Minnesota are notoriously randomly brutal and complete and utter liars to get what they want. The Star Tribune is notoriously insidious corporate propaganda. I don't believe in this 'security camera' nonsense, either. The housing area where it supposedly took place in front of (not merely outside a restaurant as apparently reported) is spooky and looks like someone a red-mustachioed middle-aged white "business" guy with thin rimmed glasses trapped in the 1980's would be creeping around for the FBI. Shades perpetually drawn, crumbling concrete stairs. Maybe a missing screen door. That's my extremely biased opinion, and that is what I remember seeing when I casually walked around investigating Uptown. I'll have to look into the details again one day when it remotely resembles something important to real 9/11 evidence instead of an Internet distraction.

Furthermore, this was the same area where less than a year prior the mayor had released a bunch of sex offenders to try an integration strategy. There proceeded to be two fires and multiple car windows smashed in for no reason (a typical call sign of someone who isn't actually interested in real looting), but it was not seen who did them. It could be the offenders or it could have been undercover style people trying to make the program look bad. In any case, just saying Uptown is fishy. It's populated, it's wealthy, and it's monitored. This non-event may as well have not happened at all, besides the sprinkling of pathetic articles about it. It also seems like a scare tactic against the waves of African immigrants.

... creator of the late BadAstronomy.com website and forum, known especially for its vicious defense of NASA's Apollo scam which came under increasing attack via his forum by those aware of the hoax. His forum also became Target #1 for proponents of a number of other "conspiracy" topics such as chemtrails, UFOs, etc. The site and forum are now gone and links to it redirect to his blog here. Plait has appeared numerous times to spew his space-related disinfo on The Discovery Channel.

Plait worked for NASA on the Hubble hoax and other projects. He was also president of the James Randi Educational Foundation founded by another gatekeeper, James Randi:.. who is also founder of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation which invented "False Memory Syndrome" to explain why certain children report having been sexually abused -- i.e., they must have made it up, yeah, that's it, they must have made it up.

Im a member at an architecture forum, Skyscrapercity.com. It's a great place to learn about high-rise construction and stay up to date with the new buildings worldwide.Members here might want to take a look at the collection of images they have from 9/11, although we've all seen most of them before. http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=659642

On the thread for these photos, I ran into this post, which perfectly embodies the distrust(disinformation?) the the "Truth Movement" has attempted to beat into the public from its beginning.

"I've learned to seriously distrust those 'X for 9/11 truth' people. They have their own agendas to fill, too. They've been proven to take bits and pieces of the actual evidence and piece it together to form their own explanations.

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth are just as whacko as the rest. The leader, Richard Gage, thinks that it's a valid point to claim that because cardboard boxes don't crumple on top of each other, that skyscrapers shouldn't, either. He walked away angrily from an argument when he was disproven on the street.Another leader, Steven Jones, actually photo-shopped his evidence and also admitted to deliberately using false info for his WTC7 explanation." -ThatOneGuy

Here, on this thread, we have a perfect example of a member who was, at first, open-minded, but through the Truth Movement, has learned to associate anyone who questions the events of that day to be a "crazy conspiracy theorist".Now, who knows if this member is not disinformation in itself. 9/11 is not the subject matter of the forum so I extend the benefit of the doubt to "ThatOneGuy" and feel a sense of loss that they were mislead this way. Im engaged in conversation with him now, and dont hold out much hope, but he needs to see why these people come off as bumbling fools!This is what was intended.Divide and conquer.