Tuesday, May 26, 2015

We know more about why 71 people were arrested during the “mostly peaceful” protests in Cleveland on Saturday.

Black protesters attacked white people who were eating at trendy cafes and bars. Some victims were hit with pepper spray as they were eating. One victim was bashed in the head with a restaurant sign.

The attacks occurred in the entertainment district of Cleveland known as “The Flats.” The location of the attacks is right by Progressive Stadium, home to the Cleveland Indians, and Quicken Loans Stadium, home to the Cleveland Cavaliers.

Two of the restaurants where attacks occurred are Panini’s and Cleveland Bar and Grill.

During the Baltimore riots, hundreds of blacks males and females participated in a colossal mob attack on random white people who were at trendy bars and restaurants at Camden Yards. Much of the video was caught on video.

“White People are a cancer”
“I’m extremely glad that the white race is dying, and you should be too.”
“White people do not have a right to exist.”
“Whiteness is racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and heteropatriarchal capitalism.”
“that the only way to really eliminate racism is to eliminate whiteness.”
“Thankfully, white birthrates are indeed very low, while the birthrates of minorities are much, MUCH higher.”
“Whites are finally getting their just desserts – and it’s about time.”

The most disturbing quote is :

“When I teach my students about human rights, critical race theory, and the role of whites in worldwide oppression, my white students often ask me how they can “atone” for the evils of whiteness and how they can make up for centuries of white oppression. And I tell them: you can do that by not having any children and ensuring that the white race does not live to oppress anyone ever again in the future.”

Someone out there Emily Goldstein is a teacher. We are trying to track down where she teaches at. There is a Emily Goldstein who is a grad student at Princeton. There is another Emily Goldstein who works at Harvard. This webmaster has made phone calls and e-mails to try to find out if either of them wrote the article.

Commentary –While the article below states that “at least one-third” of the top presidential campaign donors are Jewish, a careful read shows that the top ten donors, who are providing the bulk of the cash, are almost exclusively Jewish.

Editor's note: I've warned thousands of people that the Jews control the politics of America.

A quick look at the list of top political donors for 2014 reveals a striking fact: At least a third of the most generous 50 mega-givers were Jewish. In fact, contributions from Jewish billionaires and multi-millionaires dominated the top 10 spots on the list.

Striking, yet unsurprising.

Political activists have known for years that members of the Jewish community are over-represented in the field of political contributions.

And now, with the 2016 election cycle beginning to warm up, these Jewish donors are on the minds of all prospective candidates.

The 2014 list represents donors who were active between presidential election cycles. Some gave directly to parties, or candidates, but most of the money went to Super PACs, the main cash vehicle that will oil the wheels of the 2016 presidential campaign.

On the Democratic side, donors are taking a more relaxed approach. With Hillary Rodham Clinton dominating the field, most donors are saving their cash gifts for the actual presidential race.

Clinton comes with her own rolodex of major Jewish donors, many of whom funded her 2000 Senate race and her unsuccessful 2008 presidential bid. Haim Saban, the Hollywood cartoon billionaire, is their poster child — a devoted backer who has given millions throughout the years and has become part of the Clintons’ inner circle. Saban is not featured on the top 2014 donor list, but all Democratic activists contacted by the Forward mention his name on the top of their 2016 list.

But Clinton will also have to win over party donors who backed Barack Obama in his race against her in 2008. Some of them have frowned at her positions as too mainstream for their progressive tastes. Film and music industry mogul David Geffen, for example, took a harsh tone against Clinton during the Obama years, but has now returned to base, promising his unequivocal support.

For Republicans, the race for donors is in full force, with Jewish political contributors in front row seats.

Florida Senator Marco Rubio has locked in top Jewish donor Norman Braman, who has reportedly agreed to spend $10-15 million to make sure Rubio is the next GOP presidential candidate. Braman is an example of a new type of Jewish Republican donor, moving from a generous contributor to a mega-donor, one whose early multi-million dollar pledge makes him a top player.

Other candidates are still hoping to secure support from major funders. All eyes are set on New York hedge fund manager Paul Singer, one of the GOP’s leading contributors who has thrown a fundraiser for Rubio but not yet committed to help him. And, of course, the top prize — Las Vegas casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, who has shown he will use his fortune to support his candidates massively.

Some megaodonors have already made their mark as top tier contributors, while others, like Home Depot co-founder Bernie Marcus, still on the sidelines, are viewed by party insiders as potentially ready to upgrade their status from “major” to “mega” donor, a move that requires adding at least one zero to their total contributions.

“A conceptual-art project that includes plans to burn and bury Confederate flags in 13 mostly Southern states on Memorial Dayhas drawn the ire of groups such as the Sons of Confederate Veterans that consider the events disrespectful and divisive. …

John Sims, a 47-year-old conceptual artist in Sarasota, Fla., who is organizing the Memorial Day events, said he hoped to prod people “to reflect upon and critique the complex nature of the Confederate flag as a lasting symbol of terror.” He said he planned to stage funerals for the flag in the 11 states that formed the Confederacy, along with Kentucky and Missouri. …”

In less than 10 minutes, this is about to be broadcast live here. It’s on the same level as Pastor Terry Jones who drew enormous publicity for threatening to burn the Koran. I don’t believe Jones ever followed through on this threat though. Anyway, I didn’t want to give any oxygen to this attention whore, but its time to see if he is serious.

Penn and his White wife went into the Confederate cemetery and plucked the small little flags off the soldiers’ graves which had been placed there by the United Daughters of the Confederacy to honor Confederate Memorial Day:

“At Monday’s Bullock County Commission meeting, Attorney Myron Penn announced that he and his wife, Karen, recently removed Confederate flags from behind the Red Door Theater.

In his presentation, Penn stated that the flags were “symbols of a divided society, and I do not want the children of our community—black, white, Hispanic, or whatever–to ever feel they are a part of a community that is divided.” …

The story has roiled the Confederate heritage community on Facebook. It has also created a local backlash which was featured last night on WSFA 12:

“It’s not about race or the flag or anything else. It’s about decency and respect for the dead. You don’t do stuff like that,” added Rebecca Atkins. “You got to give respect where it’s deserved and those soldiers gave their lives just like any other soldier gives their lives. It’s nothing racial and it’s not about discrimination. You look at the person who served for our country and that’s what matters.”

Others say it was criminal, citing Alabama Code 13A-7-23.1 which states that it’s against the law to “willfully and wrongfully or maliciously destroy, remove, cut, break, or injure any tree, shrub, plant, flower, decoration, or other real or personal property within any cemetery or graveyard.”

Penn responded to the backlash and says no laws were broken since he left the items at City Hall for anyone to claim and pick up. He says the city typically removes the flags after Confederate Memorial Day anyway. …”

A group calling itself BlackLivesMatter held a press conference in Cincinatti, Ohio to denounce Major League Baseball for allegedly “disrespecting African Americans.” However, a surprise counter-protest materialized and rained on their parade.

Robert Ransdell vs.Black woman

Two of the greatest White Legends stood victorious over an organized mob of Black whiners in Cincinnati on Wednesday, demonstrating plainly the glory of the Aryan race, in the process providing content for the greatest 140 second news clip I’ve ever seen in my life.Robert Ransdell and Matthew Heimbach disrupted and agitated at yet another “racial injustice” event, wherein a group of crybabies was giving a press conference about how sad it is that Black people get arrested for committing crimes.

The Blacks were trying to talk about how they wanted to use the All-Star baseball game to create awareness about their feelings.

Only a half-dozen White men were required to completely shut down the idiot tearfest, proving once again that we possess great power and need only exercise it in order to obtain total victory over our enemies.

Bobby Hilton, supreme Negro of Word Deliverance Ministries, wanted to have a chat with our boys.

You’ll notice that none of the Blacks tried any of that “dey rassis” crap – they don’t do that to people who openly identify as racist because they know they won’t get the response they are looking for. And this proves – once again – that every time a Black calls a person racist, they are looking for a response – it is a psychological power-grab. They honestly don’t care if you hate them.

Black people do have ridiculous, childlike emotions, but White people’s feelings toward them only matter as much as these feelings are able to help them get things from us.

“You’re a racist” always means “get down below me, Whitey, for you are morally inferior.” If they know you don’t play that game, they don’t bother.

Instead, the Blacks tried to play like they were reasonable people, but if they were actually reasonable people, they wouldn’t be holding this event in the first place.

When Matt Parrott isn’t defending feminism on the internet, he’s out on the street kicking ass and taking names. And these are not easy names to take – how the hell do you spell “Lashankqua”? Much respect.

But the hero Ransdell wasn’t having any of that jibba-jabba.

“How many decades are we going to accommodate the behavior of black criminals?” Ransdell asked the whiners and the media looking on.

Two other Black pastors were quoted by Cincinnati.com, and neither used the word “racist” when describing the incident.

Chris Beard, pastor of Peoples Church in Cincinnati, just said he was frustrated by someone disagreeing with him. “We have to be able to talk about race in this country,” he said. “We have to talk about it.”

I agree. And the first step is for Blacks to stop calling everyone racist. Ransdell and Heimbach seem to have forced that step.

The Rev. Damon Lynch III said it was the 1960s all over again.

“What we saw today is nothing new,” Lynch said. “It’s what we’ve seen in the civil rights movement from the beginning: Angry white people espousing their views, trying to stop us from moving forward.”

Again, no r-word.

The media itself didn’t even use the r-word.

This is what has broken our people’s capacity to resist: being moved by name-calling. Like a bunch of little girls with hurt feelings.

The amount of media coverage this has already received – and it will go national by tomorrow morning – proves that all we have to do to get the attention we need is to man up and take action.

And finally, real White men are doing just that.

God bless them.

Robert emailed me after the event: “It is not that hard to break through that Jew media curtain, have to have the guts to do this sort of thing,” he wrote. “Political guerilla warfare on display today.”

Mayor Saint T. Thomas Jr. of Union Springs has announced his plan to quell racial tension and make the controversy go away: at a meeting of the Union Springs City Council, he issued an executive order to instruct city employees to remove the Confederate flags from the Confederate cemetery by 6 PM this evening.

Presumably, once he does that then this row will all blow over. It’s not like having the city remove the Confederate flags from the graves in the Confederate cemetery will further polarize his community, antagonize Confederate heritage groups, and attract yet more statewide and national media attention to Union Springs.

So here is what I am going to do: I’m going to drive down to Union Springs, snap some photos, and film Union Springs city employees removing the Confederate Battle Flags from the graves of Confederate soldiers in the Confederate cemetery. Then I am going to publish it here and upload it to Facebook and YouTube.

Robert Ransdell has released the following statement on the dismissal of his court case, wherein he stood charged with hurting Black people’s feelings by excercising his Constitutional Right to protest their Martin Luther King terror festival.

***

I have not been updating you all on the case as things have progressed, this was to adhere to the advice of a fellow who I would now consider a very good friend, this person is a well respected and well-liked member of Stormfront and his assistance throughout this process was beyond invaluable and appreciated by yours truly. Hands down it was the most assistance and goodwill that I have been in receipt of since becoming active in this fight 10 years ago and it will never be forgotten by me. That says a lot, I had a lot of help and camaraderie come my way recently from many people in response to my Senate campaign but I must say the hours upon hours put in on my behalf by this gentleman toward my case was really beyond anything I have ever been lucky enough to have received.

I should be on with my good friend that helped me in this matter by way of Internet radio some time in the near future, there the case will be explained in more detail. I will let him announce who he is when he chooses to. For now I will leave this account so you all get an update.

There was a hearing last Friday, May 8th, that had to do with my having made a motion to dismiss, this motion was filed by me back during the February court date in the case, this was before I gained the assistance of my legal friend on Stormfront. It was stated then that the motion would be heard at the original trial date which was back in March. They postponed that trial date in order to allow more time for the prosecution to respond to it, I was then to be given an opportunity to respond to their response and that would lead up to this Friday’s hearing.

The prosecutor basically recognized that I had been arrested where I had the legal right to be present in the city building on the day of the Martin Luther King program, so they proceeded in their response to my motion to dismiss to claim that my speech was not protected by the 1st Amendment because in their opinion it was to be classified as “fighting words”.

They actually made mention of the riots and unrest in Ferguson Missouri and other parts of the country in their response, they tried to argue that the police were within their rights because of their supposed belief that one guy there standing peaceably with a sign would cause a similar disruption in public order.

Aside from the obvious double standard and hypocrisy when compared with current events (Blacks demonstrating in dozens of places without any attempt to thwart their expression, even when violent and illegal, even when directly referring to their intention to not be peaceable “no justice, no peace”) this legal stance by the prosecutor was, as a matter of law, not applicable to my case, my case did not achieve the legal standard where the “fighting words” exception to the 1st Amendment could be applied. This legal standard had been established in a couple of Supreme Court cases which were cited by me in response to their response, of course with the help of my legal friend.

For one thing, at the time of my arrest there was no one even present besides myself and the police. Their decision to preemptively move to remove me from the venue, due to their making the prediction that some violence would ensue from my being there was expressly rejected in a Supreme Court case that was cited by my lawyer friend who came to my assistance, this was in a 15-page response to the prosecutions response to my motion that he helped me with.

So comes the decision on the motion this past Friday. At this hearing the judge does in fact concede that I had the legal right to be present in the city building as it was an event that was held as open to the public. However he goes on to claim that since this was a gathering for the public to honor a “civil rights hero” that my sign which read “Marchin Lootin Killin Day” was recognized by him as “fighting words” and not to be granted protection under the 1st Amendment. The motion to dismiss was denied by the judge.

The judge spoke as if there was a law or ordinance that required that all citizens recognize King as a “civil rights hero”, as if it was illegal to have a negative view of King. Truly ridiculous!

Funny thing was that the police upon my arrest never mentioned one word about my signs, they ordered me to leave and when I stood on my right to be present at the event they simply stated that it was a “city-owned building” and that I had to leave. My guess is that the prosecutor had to move to save them and in doing so attempted to get this “fighting words” garbage to stick.

At the March hearing it was stated that the jury trial in my case, if the motion to dismiss was denied, would take place May 13th, that being today. Well after denying my motion it is then said that my trial date was subject to being bumped back yet again, for a second time, due to a scheduling conflict. As I was looking forward to going to trial, and was well prepared thanks to my lawyer friend aiding in a number of essential items for the trial, this was probably more disappointing than the motion being denied, I wanted to get on with this thing, we were sure that if we did not win at trial we would have a conviction overturned on appeal as the prosecutions stance that my actions and signs were “fighting words” and were anything beyond political speech really was absurd.

So I get a call on Monday from the court confirming that the court date was once again moved, worse yet they on this occasion did not even provide me with another court date for my trial, they just said they “would get back with me”.

Evaluating the situation I decided to contact the prosecutor’s office to see if it would be possible to resolve this out of court as I was not wanting to endure what could well have been months more waiting for a trial, perhaps with one or more cancelled trial dates along the way. It was very frustrating to prepare and be ready for trial, twice, and then have them up and decide not to have my trial on the date it was set.

I called the prosecutor and offered, in exchange for a complete dismissal of the charge against me, to forego my ability to sue the city or police involved for arresting me as well as my agreeing to not show up again there at that one event ever again, the King program at the city building in Florence. After consulting with the head attorney there in the office I was a little surprised to hear back with their accepting those terms. Today I made this agreement official with an appearance in court.

Before agreeing to the terms I first checked with my Stormfront lawyer friend to make certain he would agree that it was the best decision to make, after all the work he has put in on the case I was not going to make the decision to go forward without his approval, which he later gave.

Turns out, due to the facts in the case not being in dispute, as far as this not being a case where the basic who, what, when, where, etc had any dispute by either party the case may well not have even went to a jury for a verdict, even though I had requested a jury trial. Since the judge had made this decision to claim my speech was “fighting words”, I may not even have had the chance to present a case at trial, where I was pretty certain in the beginning a jury would side with me and free speech. It was possible the prosecutor could have made a motion for directed verdict after presenting their case and I would then have a judge who had already ruled on the “fighting words” exemption to the 1st Amendment more than likely finding me guilty on his own without a jury being involved.

Now this decision would have likely been overturned on appeal but that process would have been something where more time and effort would have been expended, these sorts of things tend to consume you and I thought it was best to turn my attention forward and get on with my work for this struggle and with my life. I also was acting as my own attorney while in court and no matter how much aid my legal friend helped me with there was still the chance of a misstep by me that would have tanked my efforts to appeal any conviction.

While there was the opportunity should I have prevailed at trial to sue the city and police for violation of my right to peaceable protest, it really is a toss-up as to whether one can win in civil court and how much they can expect to win as a result. Sometimes even when a violation is determined to have occurred there is a relatively small amount of compensation that is awarded to the victim, especially when our side is the party who has their rights violated. The fact that I was not beat up by the police, the fact that I did not spend days or weeks in jail as a result (I was booked and released) would probably have lead to little to no punitive compensation. Then even if I was able to win a sizable judgment, that can then be appealed where a single judge, perhaps one who disagreed with my views, could erase that judgment.

As for the agreement to not show up again at the King program, I wondered afterward if I even needed to make that promise to have received a dismissal, maybe they would have just been willing to dismiss the case had I simply agreed to forego any right to sue. However I saw it as a small and token concession on my part, if I choose to do so in the future there are many other events and such where I can again attempt to exercise my rights on the date of that holiday.

Again the main factor in my decision was the inability and/or unwillingness of the court to get on with it already, lol, these courts seem to have delay and pushing dates back on a default setting or something, really gets on the nerves of someone like me who makes it a point to honor deadlines and keep to a schedule.

I am now able to walk away with the case being dismissed and both myself and my lawyer friend see that as just as good as an acquittal really, my friends we have managed to win a victory here, they were not able to attain a conviction and I walk away with no consequence. no fines, no criminal record, we got a dismissal.

I wanted to thank all my supporters on this website and elsewhere. There was another Stormfront member from the northeast (he should know who he is) who gave me some legal advice in the beginning stages of this ordeal, I thank him very much for that. Also wanted to send a thank you out to Andrew Anglin at DS for publicizing my case on his site.

As I mentioned I will at some time in the future, probably sooner than later, be on a radio program with my lawyer friend where we will discuss the case further. I also will be on with Kyle Hunt on Sunday May 31st on Renegade Broadcasting where we will discuss the case as well as my plans for the future.

I am not planning on slowing down or limiting myself in the future as a result of this entire ordeal having taken place. I have during this case limited my public activity, again at the advice of my legal friend, but I more than ever before see the time to act as now, with everything that is going on in this society at the present the last thing we need to be is timid or on our heels, I know I won’t be at least, not one bit.

I am looking forward to getting on with the work that needs to be done to advance our side in this fight, and the best thing about it is I get to do that coming off a victory in this case.

Tally one in the win column for us, the good guys!

Florence,Kentucky Police Chief John McDermond pictured below is the one responsible for violating Ransdell's civil rights.UNITED STATES CODE

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured -

They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results, they shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such inhabitant being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

“Weeks after Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the State Department objected to a proposed consultancy arrangement offered to Bill Clinton by media mogul Haim Saban, citing concerns about conflict of interest. Nevertheless, public records show that Saban’s nonprofit gave millions to the Clinton Foundation throughout Hillary Clinton’s tenure.

Saban, a billionaire best known for creating Mighty Morphin Power Rangers, has dual U.S.-Israeli citizenship and has spent heavily to support Israel. “His greatest concern, he says, is to protect Israel, by strengthening the United States-Israel relationship,” The New Yorker noted in a 2010 profile of Saban.At a conference in Israel, the article said, Saban had outlined three methods for influencing American politics: “make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets.” …

Yet between 2009 and 2013, as Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state, the Saban Family Foundation paid the Clinton Foundation more than $7 million, and listed $30.5 million in “grants and contributions approved for future payment,” according to nonprofit records filed with the Internal Revenue Service. It’s unclear whether there was any overlap between the $7 million paid and $30.5 million committed to the Clinton Foundation in those years.”…

Note: I believe Haim Saban also owns Univision which is now the largest television network in the US.

Rap mogul Jay Z has quietly used his wealth to post bail for people arrested in protests across the United States against police excesses, an author close to him said.

Dream Hampton, a writer and activist who worked with Jay Z on his 2010 memoir “Decoded,” made the revelations in a series of messages on Twitter that she later deleted but were reproduced by the hip-hop magazine Complex.

“When we needed money for bail for Baltimore protesters, I… hit Jay up, as I had for Ferguson (and he) wired tens of thousands” of dollars within minutes, read one tweet.

She also tweeted that Jay Z and his pop superstar wife Beyonce wrote a “huge check” to support the burgeoning “Black Lives Matter” movement aimed at improving police treatment of African Americans.

Protests spread last year after a white police officer shot dead unarmed African-American teenager Michael Brown in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson.

Major demonstrations, some turning violent, erupted in recent weeks in Baltimore after another African-American man, Freddie Gray, died from a spinal injury sustained in police custody.

Hampton later wrote that she deleted the tweets because Jay Z “would be pi-issed to see I was offering evidence” that he is taking action.

The tweets appeared aimed at defending Jay Z and Beyonce, who have faced accusations from some activists that they have only paid lip service to causes without tapping into the couple’s estimated $1 billion net worth.

Thursday, May 14, 2015

After a long day hocking Sierra Leone conflict diamonds on 47th Street to shiksas as rich as they are dumb, an Orthodox Jewish gentleman finally gets home, takes off his $2,000 dollarschtreimel, and slumps into his chair.

“Hymie, papa’s in the mood to nosh.” said the pear-shaped man who hadn’t bathed in three months to his eldest son, “Do we have any of those Kosher chocolate Santas left?”

“No, we ate them all. You know how much we love Santa in this home” said Hyman.

“Well, what about those Kosher Bacon-Ranch Pringles?”

“I finished them off in Shul. Our head Rabbi took some as well, he loves the taste of bacon.”

“G-D Dammit Hymie!” yelled the permanently disheveled looking man in the off-brand dress shirt, “You know how hard I work to hide my income and buy these snacks with the Goyim’s EBT card, just for you to leave me nothing?!”, “So what is there to eat or drink?”

“Well papa, mother is out buying groceries, so right now, all we have around is Kosher Drano and Kosher Mr Clean w/ Fabreze” replied the young man. The older Jewish man, resigned to his fate of having to wait for supper, finally conceded “Alright then. Fix me up some of that fit-for-Passover purple drank”.

The Rationale For KosherThe above is the only absurd scenario that would justify the current magnitude of Kosher/Kashrut (which deals specifically with the ingredients and to a lesser degree processing of consumed foods, and nothing else) certification. The fact that Rabbinical organizations are contracted by massive corporate monopolies such as Proctor & Gamble to “supervise” the production of spring water, paper towels, soap, drain cleaner, laundry detergent, and other intrinistically kosher or non-food items, and receive a fee to stamp the subtle and small circled U stamp on their packaging, is in and of itself a shameless, brazen scam.

The racket is so powerful, that even a minority of Jews have gotten confused. In a 2006 Q&A published on the Kashrut.org website–a major entity in formulating guidelines in Jewish dietary standards–the Rabbi gave a barbed, sarcastic “you’re an idiot…” response to a Jew asking if Drano was Kosher:

“Q: […] what about Drano which may be made from pig bones and skin? IF i use it is better use crystal or liquid or is Liquid Plummer a better choice?

Rabbi’s Reply: Taste each and whichever tastes better, would be the best choice. Please let us know, so that we can send out an email to everyone.”

The cynical humor with which the Kashrut.org authority wrote his take on the status of drain cleaner was reiterated in a Jews for Goy package by the Council of Orthodox Rabbis in Canada, the largest Kosher certifying money-maker in the country, which operates under the auspices of the Canadian Jewish Council (CJC) Israeli fifth column.

Jewish organizations and mass media (New York Times, Washington Post, etc) rationalize this pointless added business expense by citing “figures” provided by COR and the Orthodox Union themselves. These statistics allegedly demonstrate that Kosher certified products translate into a whopping 20% increase in sales vis a vis non-Kosher products. According to Kashrut tax-collecting organizations, despite Kosher observant Jews being a minority even amongst the 2% Jewish community in North America, other ethnic minorities such as Muslims have a “demand” for Kosher foods, while Gentiles associate kosher with “quality”. This logic, according to them, translates into added profits that allow companies paying for Rabbinical supervision in the manufacturing process to make up the costs through sales, and thus the cost to the consumer is negligible.

The premise is laughable and defies all common sense. If adding the Kosher stamp to food products was so appealing to consumers and translated into a huge 20% gain on competitors, then the symbol would be featured prominently on packaging rather than willfully occulted. To see a relevant comparison, contrast how the American Dairy Association’s well-respected “Made With Real Milk” seal-which guarantees the quality of dairy products-is boldly emphasized on food packages:

Contrast this striking symbol with the esoteric Kosher U stamp:

The first on the left is from a bottle of “Mr Clean with Fabreze” liquid cleaner I found in my bathroom. Notice the flagrant dishonesty in the placement of the Kosher stamp, which is made to look exactly like the red circled R (registered brand trademark) it is subliminally placed beneath. The Heinz Tomato Ketchup bottle uses green for its U stamp and places it next to the word “Heinz”, which the average Gentile shopper would again just assume is some kind of copyright or trademark symbol. The bottle of Arrowhead Water has a more common Kosher tax stamp position: on the side in close proximity to the Please Recycle prompt. Again, most unassuming Gentiles would think the U has something to do with recycling.

In fact, finding the Kosher U on products can often be a daunting task, as they constantly shift placement around even on the same packages, while generally place the tax stamp near completely unrelated text in order to hide in plain sight. The Orthodox Union’s assertion that advertising a product as Kosher is significantly advantageous in the eyes of Gentiles is simply nonsense, as its logo in and of itself is curiously esoteric, unlike the “REAL seal” which everyone associates with cheese or dairy. Food producers who hire them are apparently aware of this, as they go through painstaking efforts to camouflage or obscure their little U.

Could they be fearing Gentile backlash against having to pay extra for something completely useless at best, and destructive at worst?

To make a third comparison, here is a label for a Manischewitz product, which legitimately caters to an observant Jew demographic in America. Notice how the U is not only much larger and a different color than on the aforementioned examples, but there are numerous other indicators in both English and Hebrew that the product is Kosher in case Jews do not recognize the symbol:

If even Jews cannot consistently recognize the U, why doesn’t Heinz or Mr Clean add “KOSHER” in bold squiggly letters on their packages like on traditional Kosher brands? According to both the Anti-Defamation League and the Orthodox Union, non-Jewish Americans specifically seek out Kosher products. In truth, they don’t, and if they knew they had to pay extra in order to subsidize schools, institutions, and political causes that actively exclude and preach hatred against Gentiles, it could snowball into a major controversy .

The Orthodox Union’s affirmation of its “20% higher” sales figure for U stamped products is problematic if conflict of interest is taken into account. The increased appeal of an Orthodox Union endorsement ought to betaken with a grain of Kosher salt. The figure can be traced back to a “study” by Integrated Marketing & Communications, INC, whose president, CEO, and spokesman is an Orthodox Jew himself: Menachem Lubinsky. The company is not only active in marketing and hosting events selling Kosher taxed food, it even publishes a trade publication called “Kosher Today”..

I challenge readers to play a little game of “I Spy” in their pantry, if 3/4 of your products don’t have a U or the less common K on them, you aren’t looking hard enough. After a third or fourth scan of each label, you’ll see what I mean.

The Global Scale Of The Goyim Tax

The Kosher tax does not just apply to American companies, but also any suppliers and producers these multinational corporations use worldwide. The Orthodox Union (U) is in charge of “inspecting” 300 facilities in China alone, in addition to plants in more than 80 countries subject to expensive and frequent surprise visits every year. The Rabbis who are employed to visit the facilities bill all of their expenses to the company, and when you consider the fact that they have to travel from New York or Israel to the industrial producers in China or India, it’s hard to think this doesn’t add up to astronomical expenses. The tedious Kashrut process–which makes sure to split extra hairs on purpose to extract larger fees–means that large companies must pay not only independent fees, but also for Rabbis in organizations such as the Orthodox Union to travel around the world every year to superficially observe every aspect of production.

Goldman’s Gold Mine

Both Kosher certifiers and corporations who contract them are notoriously cagey about the annual fees and additional business costs incurred by the racket. The Anti-Defamation League gaslighters claim that the reason companies refuse to disclose the price and, hence, cost passed down to consumers, is because it is so small it is impossible to calculate (!). The Jewish Daily Forward, on the other hand, admits that costs are willfully obfuscated, and refers to the Orthodox Union’s Kashrut revenues as “a closely guarded institutional secret”.

The money generated by their Kosher department every year is kept secret through the Orthodox Union and other agencies using a questionable “religious” tax-filing exemption loophole to protect their finances and how they use them, as well as keeping what they charge out of the sight of consumer watchdogs and the IRS’ radar. Despite Kosher certification being an obvious for-profit enterprise, it enjoys non-profit status, which means all of the money made is completely tax-free: from the Goys hand to the Jews pocket with no middle-man interference. Yet, when asked about how much money the Orthodox Union makes per year from its Kashrut program, representative Rabbi Moshe Elefant cynically refused to give a direct answer: “If we were making billions, I wouldn’t look the way I do!”

It is impossible to know exactly how much money they’re making unless they are audited. As with all thingsJudaica, the subject lacks transparency and is covered head-to-toe in intrigue. By cross-referencing what we do know, however, we can at least make some scientific guesses.

In Sue Fishkoff’s book, Kosher Nation, she cites the annual fee for Kosher certification to be anything from “hundreds of dollars” to hundreds of thousands of dollars, which may be a gross underestimation when one looks at the sheer scale of production companies like Procter & Gamble and Kraft/Nabisco oversee. The Orthodox Union, which is just one of 1,100 Kosher certification agencies in the world, alone is in charge of 8,000 plants internationally. If we were to take her broad range of figures at face value, arrive at a rough median, then multiply it by 8,000, it is safe to say that OU is making hundreds of millions of dollars from this lucrative shakedown every year.

Rabbi Elefant may be technically right in saying he’s not a billionaire, but don’t let appearances fool you. They may wear cheap clothes they don’t like to iron, but 37% of Orthodox Jews have an income of over $150,000 a year, and that’s considering the fact that most of them go through great lengths to hide their money and cheat the selectively blindfolded taxman, so that is an underestimation as well.

Where is this money coming from? Even the most conservative estimate would suggest that if we were to take revenues generated by the worldwide Kosher certification industry in culmination (since it all goes towards the same Jewish causes anyway), this scam easily produces tens of billions of dollars for Organized Jewry every year. This figure is not the whole story, since travel fees, factory retooling, etc. are not factored in to their net profits. Furthermore, you don’t need to be very creative to guess who is selling some of the “special” Kosher ingredients OU Rabbis demand be used in every step of a products creation and packaging.

How Much Do We Pay? Hebrew Nationals Vs Oscar Mayer Beef Franks

After calling up Kraft, Nabisco, and a few other Kosher certified capitalist monopolies to ask about how much extra we pay, I was met with confusion, and even inferred to be an anti-Semite, but given no concrete answer. With few name brand products not subject to the Kosher tax, arriving at an exact figure becomes difficult.

But one sector where a comparison is easy to make is in the realm of hot dogs. Hebrew National hot dogs are perhaps the most famous Jewish food product consumed by Gentiles, and unlike other brands, “Jewdogs” use their Kosher status as a selling point (“We Answer To A Higher Authority”). Their business angle is all based on the dishonest calumny that non-Kosher hot dogs are made from pig snouts and peckers, and that Kosher certification guarantees that only high quality cuts of beef are used.

In truth, the FDA bans the use of mechanically separated beef in hot dogs (although chicken and Turkey are allowed to be used in budget brands), and additionally, requires that companies using “mystery” meat from by-products explicitly mention it on packaging.

With this in mind, why then are Hebrew Nationals so much more expensive than non-Kosher Oscar Mayer Classic Beef Franks? At K-mart, for example, a 7-pack of Hebrew Nationals costs $4.99, compared to a 10 pack of the Oscar Mayer’s equivalent at $4.29. If you put the two packages side-by-side, both products state that they have: “No Artifical Flavors, No Artificial Colors, No-Fillers, No-Byproducts”. Their nutritional value per-frank is virtually identical, as are the ingredients they use. Hebrew National is produced by the multi-national Con Agra foods, which takes in about $16 billion dollars in revenue per year, while Oscar Mayer is owned by Kraft Foods which takes in $18 billion per year.

Perhaps Hebrew Nationals claim of using unspecified “premium cuts of beef” is why they are so much more expensive, but their assertion is unfounded. On average, “Kosher” cuts of beef are also the cheapest (Cheek, Chuck, and Brisket), while the expensive cuts that produce the most sought after steaks and beef products are largely non-Kosher. They want you to think they’re grinding up Fillet Mignon and making hot dogs out of it, but in truth Hebrew Nationals are made from Chuck ground beef, which is hardly “premium”, as it is the fattiest (78%-84% Lean), but the only Kosher, source of hot dog meat. Oscar Mayer Beef Franks use mostly Chuck mixed in with higher quality (but non-Kosher) ground beef sources such as Round (85-89% Lean) and Sirloin (90-95%). You can see this difference proven on the nutritional labels of both, since the standard serving of Hebrew Nationals have more fat and calories than the Oscar Mayer version.

So then, why are Hebrew Nationals a ripoff? It can’t be taste: buy both varieties and taste them for yourself, you won’t know the difference. Their sales seem to show they are almost equally as popular. There is only one difference in the production of the two hot dogs, and from there you can start imagining how much Kosher tax you’re paying on all your other products. Every kind of Kosher hot dog is considerably more expensive than most non-Kosher beef franks, including Fairway’s generic brand Jewdogs.

When Tay Sachs-free curious consumers ask about how much they’re paying extra for Kosher certification, they are spouting a “canard”, but the subject is freely and hotly debated within Jewish circles and publications. The price of Kosher certification in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, for example, has been explicitly referred to as “gouging”. Haaretz even categorizes Kosher products as often inferior to non-Kosher ones, which is a blow to the myth that food subject to Rabbinical approval is somehow superior or purer. In fact, observant Jews often complain that it is hard to find organic foods that are Kosher certified, as the Orthodox Union’s fees are prohibitive for the small enterprises that dominate this market. In Israel, where the major supermarket chains carry exclusively Kosher-inspected food, the Finance Ministry was forced to intervene in reaction to the abusive price of certification that led to increases of up to 35% on imported goods. In newspaper’s for Jewish eyes only, the fees are referred to as an “Insane Expense”.

But don’t expect any intervention from our government, that would be hate.

By and large, the consumer pays about a few cents extra per product (depending on what it is) when they go to the grocery store, due to the tax spread out amongst unwitting Gentiles. But in a country with hundreds of millions of people like the United States, where Goy shoppers are paying anywhere from hundreds of dollars to thousands of dollars extra every year for something they don’t need or want, this adds up to windfall profits for Kosher certification groups (who even fight amongst themselves over “turf”).

In the end, the specifics don’t matter, paying even a single cent in excess on our supermarket bill to fund the morally abhorrent conspiracies of Organized Jewry is both unacceptable and dangerous.

So why do all the major businesses take up a significant additional expense in production just for a Rabbi to walk around and put a little, clandestine U on their products?

The answer is protection.

In an article published by the Huffington Post, Rabbi Jason Miller decided to divulge some inside information in his “very compassionate” (or shameless, if you translate it into the Jew-to-Goyish dictionary) self-promoting article announcing the entry of his company,v“Kosher Michigan”, into the rat race. In the article he goes through a number of anecdotes, mostly dealing with the cut-throat battle between agencies for turf, but also including a case where Jews were threatening the lives of government food inspectors over some Kosher certification issue. He correctly calls the syndicates what they are: “Kosher Nostra”. He quotes another Rabbi, Don Yoel Levy, who summarizes the not so holy intentions of this tax on Goyim: “Kashrus today is about power and money”.

For the myriad of smaller companies that provide individual ingredients to food giants like Nabisco–which is owned by Irene Rosenfeld’s global Mondelez International empire–it’s more or less a question of “compelling” them by holding contracts hostage. Contrary to what some other material on the Kosher tax suggests, Rabbis don’t personally walk into every business start-up and demand money…not because they wouldn’t, but because there’s just not enough of them to do it. Instead, they focus on the big accumulators of capital in the food industry, many of whom are Jews themselves. On page 54 of Fishkoff’s Kosher Nation (which is insightful, but obviously does not give the whole story), she writes that ingredients must be certified down to the “micro-chemical”. She quotes a certain Rabbi Yaakov Horowitz who expounds deeper:

“If Nabisco all of a sudden says it will only use one kind of kosher oil for its entire facility, which is huge, there are companies out there that will become kosher just for Nabisco. These people may not know anything about kosher or want to know anything about kosher, but they want that Nabisco account”.

Another strong motive for submitting to the Rabbinical councils is that Gentile-owned companies fear the power Jews wield in all segments of Western national life. This is not to excuse their treason, since capitalists at the higher levels will sell their grandma to protect the shares in their portfolio. Gentiles who rise up the ladder and manage to break into ranks of the elite get to know Jews really fast, as any Goy working on Wall Street (usually beneath a glass ceiling, with people carrying one another in chairs singing Hava Nagila sticking their tongue out and flipping the bird to the equally as greedy Gentiles beneath) will tell you when they’re sure nobody’s listening. The concerns of Gentile corporate food producers are not unfounded, after all, the last two commissioners of the Food and Drug Administration–an entity capable of making a problem for your food production if they want to–have been Jewish (Stephen Ostroff and Margaret Hamburg).

Additionally, Jewish control of the state isn’t even that relevant, all it would take to destroy a food company would be to publish an investigative piece “exposing” the dirty practices pretty much all industrial producers engage in if, for whatever reason, they have a spat with the Rabbis soliciting them. The capitalists prefer to submit, pass the cost off to their customers, and not have to risk falling afoul of the Kosher Nostra. When you choose your money over your race, you’re choosing Jewish world power.

So what can be done about this despicable theft? Unless you’re planning a hunger strike, boycotting Kosher certified products is impossible. The only real solution would be to put into motion a California-style petition and get a referendum demanding full disclosure and investigation into the seedy world of Kosher certification. Money may be the God of the Jews, but the Kashrut business should not enjoy, and hide its income, behind a 501(c)3 Church tax-exemption.