Bernard J. Piersma, Professor of Chemistry, Houghton College, reviewed
the first edition (1988 hardcover) of this book in PCSF 42 (March 1990), page 53.
That edition has been out of print for several years. Dr. Davis has added a six
page preface to this edition, but otherwise the book appears to have undergone little change.

Dr. Piersma's review may be revisited on the ASA web site; he recommended
the book "enthusiastically" and I echo that recommendation, as well as his review,
which excellently catches the flavor and importance of the book. Sixteen
intervening years have not dimmed the book's luster. It should be a "keeper" for every ASA member.

Paul Davis is the author of over twenty-five books. His 1983 book, GOD AND THE NEW PHYSICS,
was reviewed by Robert Shacklett in JASA (Dec 1984). His 1995 book, ARE WE ALONE?,
was reviewed by Lucas Morel in PSCF 48 (June 1996), page 124. Davies is currently a
professor of natural philosophy in the Australian Centre for Astrobiology at Macquarie
University. In 1999, he was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature.

Most ASA members are familiar with LaPlaces' 1819 claim that the universe is completely
determined, the future fixed in every detail. Davies completely demolishes this claim.
He also regards reductionism as a failed research programme, writing (page 140) "Complete
reductionism is nothing more than a vague promise founded on the outdated and
discredited concept of determinism. . . (it) simply dodges many of the questions
about the world that are most interesting to us. . . it denies that the arrow of
time has any reality. Defining a problem away does not explain it." He also
rejects the concept of "uncaused creativity," one espoused by Bergson, Popper
and Denbigh, on the basis that it is simply "unscientific." That leaves, for
him, only one position, "organizing principles," in the hunt. On page 142, as
part of his argument, he writes: "I have been at pains to argue that the steady
unfolding of organized complexity in the universe is a fundamental property of
nature ... there must be new general principles ... which have yet to be discovered."

A Christian apologist ignores books such as this at the considerable risk of
being excluded from the conversation. If you've not read it, get it. Study it.
Think how to present the "Christian" perspective in a book study group. Must
we argue for the Bergson alternative? Or are there other possibilities
to explain our existence in this complex and wonderful world?