Spatz, et al. v. Facebook

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge

RELATED CASE ORDER

An Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related has been filed, requesting a determination as to whether the following cases are related within the meaning of Civil L.R. 3-12(a):

On the basis of the material submitted to the Court, as the Judge assigned to the earliest filed case, I find that the cases:

[ ] ARE NOT RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a).

[ X ] ARE RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a).

Counsel are instructed that all future filings in the reassigned cases are to bear the initials MMC immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in the reassigned cases will be rescheduled by the Court. Any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-noticed by the moving party before the undersigned; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the undersigned.

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.