Oh. Well I guess I just don't understand what that means. The should be "able" to? How would we ever know that unless they actually do?

That's tangential. Should we expect "top talent," regardless whether they can prove it, be able to maintain a high GPA and earn a high LSAT score?

Uh. Depends on how you define "top talent." If top talent is people who will be spectacular lawyers, then I would say that no, not all of them would have been "able" to maintain a high GPA, for example. Again, what does be "able" to mean. Be able to given the circumstances of their own lives? Be able to in a vacuum in which they did nothing but concentrate on schoolwork? Be able to in a grade-inflated major or in a very rigorous program? I mean, it just seems like a completely meaningless question.

Top talent, I would think, are people who deserve to be at the best of the best law schools (however you define them) and I would assume everyone expects to become the best lawyers, judges, academics, etc.

It doesn't change the discussion much, I don't think, however we define able. Since none of us live in a vacuum, let's define it as in their own lives, but give them the benefit of having had their ultimate goal since freshman year of high school being admission to a top law school.

Also, keep in mind we're talking in generalities. Sure there was probably some super-genius who could have killed the LSAT, but he was distracted fighting lung cancer, sudden blindness, and the death of a loved one. This is clearly neither the norm nor illustrative of any generality we might make about admissions standards.

Doesn't matter. Admissions counselors tend to adjust based on major and university. A 3.2 in mechanical engineering at MIT is higher than a 3.8 in business admin at Joeblow Tech.

For law school admissions?? Nuh uh. Come on. Look at LSN. It matters some, but not to the extent that a 3.2 would trump a 3.8, no matter what the respective programs.

I don't find this line of inquiry very interesting, so I'll let it be, but that part is just not true.

Relying on LSN is incredibly dubious. Regardless, it's an unimportant discussion. Let's assume for the sake of actually discussing the question that all UG institutions and majors are identical, and that GPAs are objective measures of performance in those programs.