White/Christian/Western Europeans know in their hearts what must be done.

Whether they will discover the intestinal fortitude required to do it in time — well, that’s the $64 question. Right now it doesn’t look all that good, but it’s not yet time to completely give up hope.

There _are_ political parties in Western Europe that know what must be done. However, they are attacked by the _other parties_ as being “racist”, “xenophobic”, or whatever. Yet if ANYone is able to “save Europe”, it will be the far-right-wing parties. NONE of the other parties will come around in time; indeed, amongst them, it will more likely be a question of which one surrenders first.

I’ve posted this before on FR, and I’ll post it again:

Western Europe has but two choices:
1. Boxcars, or...
2. Burqhas.

If Europeans do not choose option #1 in due time, they WILL have option #2 forced upon them.

Europe has been going along a lot longer than 'you there in North America', I'm pretty sure we have this 'civilisation' business sussed by now. So you let us worry about our problems and you sit in your basement in the States fretting about those evil non-Christians.

Yet if ANYone is able to “save Europe”, it will be the far-right-wing parties.

Speaking as a german, we have experiences with giving power to a far-right-wing party, which exploited irrational fears of a religious minority in times of economic hardship, and which promised us that they allegedly were "the only ones able to save Germany".

I can tell you: It was not a good idea to elect this far-right-wing party...

Damn, never did I think that it was possible but pulling a Nazi comparison is actually too easy. It's so easy it doesn't even have to be stated. I'm sure everyone else got that same vibe from this. And I'm one of those people who are against throwing that comparison around, but god damn.

Is this piece of FILTH actually suggesting "The Final Solution" as advocated by (his no doubt heroes) Hitler et al?

How F**KING DARE YOU! The rule of law in a liberal secular society, properly applied can deal with any extremism, otherwise by illegal actions it is destroyed by itself - it is no longer liberal and secular. By application of human rights laws and politics illiberal muslims cannot overwhelm the State, only by cowardice in such application can enemies of our society triumpph

I think the reason Europe doesn't want to do that is because they did have that happen about 70 years ago, and it didn't turn out so well. They knew it was wrong then, and they know it's still wrong now. And since you said that white Christians know what needs to be done (wink wink), you now need to acknowlege that Christianity is not a religion of peace. You're just advocating what you are afraid the Muslims want to do, and you're no better than they are.

How much you want to bet that Grumplestiltskin denies the Holocaust ever happened?

Reading what is essentially Anders Breivik's manifesto: The Abridged Version here, I wonder if all those allied troops/personnel/civilians who died to eliminate Nazism* & it's way of thinking was all for naught. It's as if WWII had never happened.

PROTIP: Hitler was an illegal immigrant. Hitler was a Christian. Hitler was a right-winger:

[/Reverse Godwin]

Those who forget the past, are doomed to repeat it.

I think we are now seeing right-wing Fundamentalist Christian Theocratic Dominionists - such as Grumbleforeskin here - in their true light.

^Doesn't sound very nice does it eh, Free Repubic? Almost like persecution. Sounds just like what Neo-Nazis would say eh, Grumbleforeskin? Well, now you know how you sound to everyone else.

*- I wonder what would have happened, if Hitler had attacked the USA (say, New York), instead of Japan (Pearl Harbour)? Methinks the likes of the KKK would have been put into internment camps instead of Japanese-Americans. The resulting post-war Reverse-McCarthyism against anyone remotely right-wing would've been fun: 'Have you now or ever been a member of the Nazi Party?' >:D