Since
the unspeakable horror in Newtown, CT, last December, the lackeys
who serve the ruling elite have stepped up efforts to ban specific
types of weapons. There has never been any question the desired goal
is to disarm we the people because the Second Amendment is the only
thing standing between us and those who wish to rule us with an iron
fist.

Efforts
to nullify the Second Amendment have been stepped up with the usual
cast of clowns releasing more flatulence than a massive herd of cattle:

"Sharpton
and other black leaders were meeting and then held a press conference.
In that press conference, Sharpton said, “Absolutely, I mean
if you look at the Second Amendment it was that you would have militia
to protect yourself in case the government came and attacked citizens.
First of all, if the government were to come to disarm you, you would
not be able to use an automatic weapon to defend yourself. Let's be
serious. We're in a world of drones now so the Second Amendment would
not help you in that area. It is absurd to try to cite that.”

What's
absurd is that buffoon speaking on an issue he knows nothing about.

Then,
we have victims of mind melt; their brain has been washed by the relentless
propaganda dished out to Americans on a daily basis for decades:

"In
a column that appeared after the shooting with the headline "Kaul:
Nation needs a new agenda on guns," he proposed a new liberal
agenda: repeal the Second Amendment, declare the NRA a terrorist organization
and make membership illegal, and well, make violent threats to Republican
leaders and NRA members. The Des Moines Register published this junk
on December 29.

"I
would tie Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, our esteemed Republican
leaders, to the back of a Chevy pickup truck and drag them around
a parking lot until they saw the light on gun control," he wrote.
Is that a threatening James Byrd reference? "And if that didn't
work, I’d adopt radical measures," he continued. This was
how he spelled out the other agenda items, which included killing
NRA members who wouldn't surrender their arms:" (Rest at link
above)

Over
the past few years, great effort has been made to reach out to sheriffs
across the country as the tyranny coming out of the Outlaw Congress
and various unconstitutional agencies continue to terrorize Americans
over things like raw milk. Actually, Jack McLamb's association, Police
& Military Against The New World Order, has been at it for
more than a decade. Jack is a former police officer himself; a real
gentleman. Former sheriff, Richard Mack, has been out there working
hard, reaching out
to sheriffs around the country.

"CNSNews.com
asked, “There have been 381 sheriffs that have signed on saying
they would not enforce gun laws they believed were unconstitutional.
Would the administration have a problem if local law enforcement did
not enforce whatever gun package were to pass?”

"Carney
responded that he had not seen the list of sheriffs. “I think
as a general proposition we think that people ought to follow the
law,” Carney told CNSNews.com. “As an absolute matter
of fact in my view, and I think many other constitutional experts,
there's not a single measure in this package of proposals the president
has put forward that in anyway violates the Constitution. In fact,
they reflect the president's commitment to our Second Amendment rights.”

I
sincerely appreciate the work of Jack, Richard and all the sheriffs
in this country who have stepped forward to show their support for
the Second Amendment. However, the word sheriff appears no where in
the U.S. Constitution making that office vulnerable to politicians
who react with hysterical emotion instead of reason and logic.

"The
first effort emerged in Texas. Legislation proposed by Dallas Democratic
Rep.
Yvonne Davis would remove any sheriff or law enforcement officer
who refuses to enforce state or federal laws. What's more, it would
remove any elected or appointed law enforcement officer for simply
stating or signing any document stating that they will not obey federal
orders. A gun lobbyist told Secrets, "Beware because once something
like this is introduced in one state, it will be followed very quickly
in several other states."

The
bill is H.B. 2127. Pray tell, Ms. Davis - just how do you intend to
remove any sheriff in this state? They are elected by the people.
One can hope that since our state legislature is controlled by Republicans,
both houses, with a Republican governor, that bill won't stand a chance.
Texans might want to call their state rep and tell him/her you're
outraged Ms. Davis has introduced such a bill.

It's
not just a nationwide effort to limit their power, but to abolish
the office of sheriff altogether. Mark my words, it's coming.

Then,
there are the imbeciles who have zero understanding of the meaning
of the Second Amendment:

"As
courageous state legislators enlist in the fight to repel the
federal government's assault on the Second Amendment, the governor
of one western state is telling a liberty-minded state representative
to stand down. Governor Gary Herbert of Utah recently called a
pro-gun rights bill sponsored by a Utah state representative “an
exaggeration” and encouraged the lawmaker to “adhere to the law.”
This is not the level of support citizens of the Beehive State
would expect from the man they elected to lead their state."

Since
2005, Dr. Edwin Vieira has been trying to educate gun onwers and lawmakers
about the constitutional militia. I've been trying, but running into
a brick wall from individuals who simply ignore the history of the
militia and the true meaning of the Second Amendment. Responses I
get from private militia members here and in other states is "we
don't need the stinking state". Such geniuses. I hate to break
it to you fellas, but as "private" militias, you have zero
legal authority to do anything other than target practice.

Our
legislature is going to do nothing about a constitutional sound money
bill, Agenda 21, revitalizing the constitutional militia or the Seventeenth
Amendment. I sent every Republican (they control both houses) a letter
directing them to those working papers and the one bill I wrote .I
included Dr. Vieria's nine page presentation to the Montana banking
committee on a constitutional sound money bill. It cost me about $350.00
for the printing and postage. I might as well have burned the money
and not wasted my time. Despite efforts to get the word out to active
groups here in Texas, few did anything in contacting state legislators
and senators to get three bills written; I wrote one with the working
paper. Because there was no pressure, those four issues will not be
addressed by our legislature this session. Our legislature goes out
of session May 27, 2013, until January 6, 2015. By then it will be
too late. Don't Mess With Texas is nothing but empty words.

I'll
say it again: militias around the country are doing great work in
planning and preparing for disasters to help first responders. They
are responsible, patriotic folks. But, there is a difference between
the constitutional militia and private ones:

"All
this is no merely quaint story-telling about men attired in knee-britches
and three-cornered hats, or the anachronistic and academic stuff of
Colonial re-enactors and museums at Lexington and Concord. This is
what "the Militia of the several States" actually were,
codified in every relevant statute of every Colony and independent
State throughout a period of almost 150 years prior to ratification
of the Constitution. And therefore this is what "the Militia
of the several States" still are, because that term incorporated
in the Constitution must be interpreted in light of its historical
antecedents as known to the Founding Fathers, and continue to be given
the selfsame construction until the Constitution is amended (which,
with the assistance of Providence, in this particular it never will
be). See Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189, 206 (1920). The only possible
difference to be countenanced today actually amounts to an expansion:
Now, with the legal emancipation of women, "the Militia of the
several States" arguably includes all able-bodied females, who
might be called to serve in some capacities in the most critical,
last-ditch situations of State and National defense, freeing men for
more arduous duties.

"So,
constitutionally YOU very likely--indeed, almost surely--are a member
of "the Militia of the several States" in the State in which
you live. And, if so, the Constitution imposes a duty on YOU to keep
and bear arms in the Militia for the defense of your State and Nation,
because that is the meaning of the Militia: the people in arms, and
therefore the people with arms. And, most importantly, their own arms:
their own private property in their own personal possession.

"Moreover,
because the duty to keep and bear arms is of constitutional stature,
each individual enjoys an absolute constitutional right as against
every level, department, or branch of government--National, State,
and local--to fulfill that duty. Inasmuch as the Constitution requires
all of We the People eligible for the Militia to possess their
own private arms in their capacity as a governmental institution,
then on no account, for no reason, and by the application of no power
can any level of government disarm any of them. Indeed, to argue that
any other branch of government may disarm the one branch of government
that the Constitution specifically requires to be armed is so illogical
as to verge on insanity."

"Although
some of these private “militias” claim “common law”
as their basis, they cannot stand on such a foundation. For “common
law” had nothing whatsoever to do with the formation and operation
of the Militia in any of the Colonies or independent States prior
to ratification of the Constitution. All of those Militia were the
products of charters or statutes. And in none of them did judges or
sheriffs play any directing role. Under the Constitution, therefore,
the same pattern must obtain today. As wholly private organizations
with no legal authority peculiar to themselves—for certainly
not a single one of them has been empowered by a State statute to
participate in the activities they have taken upon themselves—these
“militias” are necessarily not parts of the government
of any State or Locality."

"Although
the Constitution recognizes "the Militia of the several States"
as State institutions, the States themselves cannot dispense with
the Militia, in whole or material part, because the Constitution presupposes
the permanence of the Militia, and the Constitution is "the supreme
Law of the Land", which all State officials "shall be bound
by Oath or Affirmation, to support". Article VI, Clauses 2 and
3.....

"The
Constitution reserves to the States "the Authority of training
the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress".
Article I, Section 8, Clause 16. If Congress fails to "prescribe[
]" such "discipline", and in all cases where any Congressionally
mandated "discipline" does not apply, the States do not need Congress's
permission to administer their Militia as they may judge to be
necessary and proper. Prior to ratification of the Constitution,
the States' powers over their Militia were plenary. The Constitution
delegated to Congress certain limited powers with respect to the
Militia--which powers, if Congress properly exercises them, are
"the supreme Law of the Land" that supersede conflicting State
laws. Article VI, Clause 2. Otherwise, the States retain a concurrent
power to enact laws to govern their Militia. Amendment X."

"As
a warning shot over the bow, South Carolina is poised to take action
to protect the rights of its citizens. Congratulations, you are a
member of South Carolina's “unorganized militia.” Now
that you know that, state Sen. Tom Corbin, R-Greenville, wants to
make sure you have access to guns in case the governor ever calls
on you to defend the state. Corbin has proposed a new state law —
unanimously approved Wednesday by a Senate subcommittee — that
would guarantee all members of the unorganized militia “shall
have the right, at his own expense, to acquire, possess, keep, and
bear all firearms that could be legally acquired or possessed by a
citizen of South Carolina as of December 31, 2012.”

"Translated
that means — barring an almost certain constitutional challenge
if the proposal becomes law — you can buy an assault weapon,
regardless of whether the federal government bans them, as President
Barack Obama and others have proposed. The proposed law is based on
a state law, dating back to 1881, that refers to an “unorganized
militia” made up of “all able bodied persons over 17 years
of age.”

Would
Sen. Corbin please tell me where in the Second Amendment it says unorganized
militia? "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security
of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall
not be infringed." While I appreciate Sen. Corbin's effort, it
doesn't solve the problem of the current push to ban certain weapons.
This latest is just another incremental step.

Ted
Nugent took some actor named Jim Carrey to the woodshed over an anti-Second
Amendment video he apparently made. But, why hasn't Ted Nugent stepped
up to the plate to support revitalizing the constitutional militia?
His voice would activate a whole lot of gun owners.

Keep
sending your money to the NRA. But remember this: Wayne LaPierre talks
the big talk, but without the NRA's big money, Harry Reid can't keep
getting reelected. Wayne LaPierre is a friend of Comrade Reid: Video:
NRA’s Wayne Lapierre Praises Anti-Gun Harry Reid. Lie down
with dogs, get up with fleas. Harry Reid has treaded carefully regarding
the so-called assault weapons ban. Like any hooker on a street corner,
he knows where his next buck comes from - your membership dues.

For
the life of me, I still cannot fathom why a fine organization like
Gun Owners of America hasn't mobilized their millions of members to
work towards the only real solution to stopping gun control. GOA has
a full page of all of Dr. Edwin Vieira's militia
columns here. If they put out a special mailing to their millions
of members outlining a game plan for the state houses, just think
of what could happen!

I
say this to the gun owners in this country who continue to ignore
the only real solution: You keep fighting this war with an unloaded
gun and you're going to continue to lose.

If
gun owners think for one minute this push to disarm us is going away,
you're in denial. Throwing money at "conservatives" in the
Outlaw Congress or signing petitions to get some bill passed in the
Outlaw Congress to "protect our Second Amendment rights"
has done NOTHING to stop what's going on. Throwing more money at the
NRA or other gun groups to stop the never ending legislation in state
houses and the Outlaw Congress has done NOTHING to stop what's going
on. Remember the old saying: Doing the same thing over and over again
is a form of insanity.

If
gun owners in this country really wanted to stop the constant attack
on the Second Amendment, they would have rallies at their state capitol
with thousands demanding their legislature revitalize the constitutional
militia. If you don't think that will do the trick, let me remind
folks about how the patriots of Tennessee defeated the effort to enact
a state sales tax:

"As
protesters began to gather outside the legislative chambers Monday
evening, several legislators were taken away by ambulance and hospitalized
for blood pressure and heart problems as tensions rose and tempers
flared. By Tuesday morning, tax protesters were brandishing signs
reading, “Let's send them all to the ER!”

"Trouble
began brewing Friday evening as the state income tax proposal emerged
from a legislative conference committee considering the state budget
after local news shows had already aired. Legislators supporting the
income tax had hoped that a vote would be taken on the proposal Saturday
morning to avoid giving anti-tax groups time to mount a repeat of
the tax revolt that occurred last November, when an earlier income-tax
measure died as taxpayers besieged legislative offices with tens of
thousands of calls and e-mails every hour. But the hopes of income-tax
supporters were dashed when two of Nashville’s competing talk
radio stations, WLAC and WTN, joined forces and served as the catalyst
for opposition to the legislative proposal."

I
hope you read the full article. It's also how we, led by Jodi Waters
out in California, beat the biggest oil companies in the world over
the MTBE gasoline additive disaster. It is no longer in any gasoline
in the country. We took our angry voices to the state house and we
won.

The
patriots of Tennessee won. How about gun owners in this country? More
donations, petitions, endless lawsuits or raising hell at your state
capitol until your legislators "get it"? Put up or shut
up as they say.