Today’s announcement that a decision on a 3rd runway at Heathrow has been postponed should leave anti Hs2 campaigners with their heads in their hands. Why? Because it highlights just how inconsequential they are and how ineffective they’ve been.

The Heathrow postponement is widely seen as a political maneuver to avoid the Tories being embarrassed during the London mayoral elections in May as their candidate, Zac Goldsmith, is an implacable opponent of Heathrow expansion.

In contrast, the Tories (and all the other parties for that matter) have shown no real concern that Hs2 would have politically adverse affects. This is a huge blow for the the anti Hs2 mob as for years they’ve pretended the high speed line is a political hot potato. What’s interesting is that Heathrow is essentially a local London/South-East issue whilst Hs2 affects much more of the UK and far more constituencies.

As Hs2 isn’t seen as a negative political issue one can only wonder how much longer the anti Hs2 campaign can stagger on for. They’ve been on the back-foot ever since the Hybrid Bill passed with such a stonking majority, the general election result compounded their woes and they’ve had no good news for years. There’s none in the offing.

I wonder how much longer their remaining groups (StopHs2 and Hs2aa) will last into 2016? Joe Rukin’s laughable claim that there were ‘reasons to be cheerful‘ looks increasingly likely to be his epithet.

Just as they were sobering up & realising last week’s furore over Network Rail wouldn’t stop Hs2 the anti campaign’s been dealt yet another blow by the Davies commission recommending building a third runway at Heathrow. This has exposed that for many hs2 antis, green issues were merely a figleaf to hide their nimbyism. After all, how can they oppose Hs2 on green grounds yet support building a 3.5km runway with all the associated pollution that will cause?

The truth is, many of those Chiltern Nimbys welcome Heathrow expansion. For them the airports only a short drive down the M40 in a ‘Chelsea tractor’ and they won’t have to put up with the noise, pollution & inconvenience.

So, can we expect the Hs2 anti’s to turn their fire on Heathrow, using the same ‘green’ arguments they trot out against Hs2 to condemn the environmental damage it will cause, or question why we need a 3rd runway if all the planes aren’t full? The immortal words of Jim Royle spring to mind…