"Alex (karl exceed) Decker" <alex.decker@gmail.com> writes:
> Just out of curiosity, I noticed that Debian has not been registered as
> CGL compliant since the 2.0 standard. Is there any plan on working
> toward CGL 5.0 compliance?
> I understand that it's a bit above and beyond normal usage, but a proven
> 5-nine uptime is something to brag about...
This is the first time I've ever heard anyone even mention the existence
of CGL, and I work professionally as a systems administrator for critical
services (on Linux, even). Does anyone actually care about this
specification? Often this sort of thing ends up being essentially a
marketing tactic by the vendors involved in developing the specification
rather than being something useful for improving technical quality.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>