Utter myth. Most men in the World are intact, yet have no problems getting women to slob on their cocks. And even if it were true, you'd be demeaning yourself by amputating part of your genitalia to please woman. Go get yourself some self-esteem!

Quote

and don't particularly like how it looks. Glad I'm snipped

Keep telling that to yourself, and you might end up believing that you're not a mutilated half-man.

for what it's worth . . . yesterday, in a speech at the International AIDS Conference in Toronto, Bill Clinton called for worldwide male circumcision to help reduce the spread of HIV infections.

It's not worth shit. Firstly, Clinton is no medical authority, and has no evidence to support the claim that male mutilation prevents the spread of AIDS. Secondly, he's American and very likely mutilated himself, so he's culturally biased in favor of it. Thirdly, even if mutilation prevented the spread of HIV, there's a much simpler, humane and ethical solution: use condoms, for fuck sake! And finally, Clinton was elected, partly, do to the support of Zionist Jews within political orgnizations inside the U.S, so he has a vested interest in spreading the custom of male mutilation so as to make the World safe for the Jews. Nothing against Jews, but facts are facts. You know the primary way the Nazis identified the Jews in Germany? That's right: by their mutilation status. Of course, instead of starting to mutilate all the helpless little boys of the World, a much simpler, cost-effective and more ethical solution would be for the jews to stop mutilating their sons!

GET A LIFE homo!!!!! LOSE THE USELESS FLAP! You are the most useless person I have ever seen communicating on the computer.

Did I hit a nerve there, mutilated half-man? I have a suggestion for you: start telling to yourself that you're a complete, non-mutilated man, and you might end up believing it. Maybe that will chill you out and make you stop hating me so much...

SMM is dominating this discussion. It's obvious he's more intelligent than most of the people here. The AIDs argument is stupid. Unless you live in Africa and f**k whores it doesn't matter if you were mutilated or not. If you don't f**k whores your chance of getting AIDs through sexual contact is zero. It's a dumb argument for cutting skin off. Luckily, the number of parents opting to have their children's skin cut is diminishing. It's only like 50% of Americans now. In Europe and Asia nobody does it except for Jews. It was started by religious freaks. Women don't care about it. An erect penis looks the same as an erect mutilated penis. The foreskin automatically retracts. Nature made it this way.

I would be upset with my parents. If I had to deal with the fact that they cut the skin off my penis as a child, without consent, while some sadistic obese lesbian nurse looked on....

I woud be upset about it. At least a normal person has the option of mutilating their penis later on. A little baby boy has no say in the matter.It's ritualistic bullshit, and it's being phased out of American society.

SMM is dominating this discussion. It's obvious he's more intelligent than most of the people here. The AIDs argument is stupid. Unless you live in Africa and f**k whores it doesn't matter if you were mutilated or not. If you don't f**k whores your chance of getting AIDs through sexual contact is zero. It's a dumb argument for cutting skin off. Luckily, the number of parents opting to have their children's skin cut is diminishing. It's only like 50% of Americans now. In Europe and Asia nobody does it except for Jews. It was started by religious freaks. Women don't care about it. An erect penis looks the same as an erect mutilated penis. The foreskin automatically retracts. Nature made it this way.

I would be upset with my parents. If I had to deal with the fact that they cut the skin off my penis as a child, without consent, while some sadistic obese lesbian nurse looked on....

I woud be upset about it. At least a normal person has the option of mutilating their penis later on. A little baby boy has no say in the matter.It's ritualistic bullshit, and it's being phased out of American society.

Dominating? The twat spouts mindless babble and he's dominating? Please. Most guys in here can see through his bullshit. The fact is that no one gives a fuck as much as you two homos. You're right the difference isn't that big anyway if any at all.

And as far as your statistics.. the only reason the number is going down is cause more blacks and latinos are reproducing at a faster rate than euro whites in this country or coming here illegally. Self respecting white parents still have their sons cut and there's nothing wrong with it.

Dominating? The twat spouts mindless babble and he's dominating? Please. Most guys in here can see through his bullshit. The fact is that no one gives a f**k as much as you two homos. You're right the difference isn't that big anyway if any at all.

And as far as your statistics.. the only reason the number is going down is cause more blacks and latinos are reproducing at a faster rate than euro whites in this country or coming here illegally. Self respecting white parents still have their sons cut and there's nothing wrong with it.

Blacks are more likely to be circumsized than whites. In 2003 43% of whites were left intact. That % is rising fast as you can see on the chart. More and more doctors are informed properly and are informing parents better.

Imo it probably doesnt make such a big difference. There's no reason to do it and it has it's dangers ( infection, skin bridges, ... ) so i would advice anyone not to do so. The "peer pressure" argument is gone now as well. Let the kid make his own decision later for himself before you cut anything from his body. Also not-cutting it doesnt make you cum faster, it ALLOWS you to cum faster. If you have any control you can decide when you cum yourself. A lot of porn actors are not-cut actually (i noticed those guys on bangbros, or Rocco Siffredi e.g.).

Yes, I'm completely dominating you. I support everything I write with medical evidence, statistics and precise evaluation of the available data. I also simply destroy the moronic arguments, of the boy-mutilators, by showing how incredibly illogical they are. What do the boy-mutilators respond to me? Well, they call me gay, say that I probably don't get any pussy, say that they are glad to be mutilated, etc, etc. They have no logical arguments to support their cause; making ad hominem attacks en absurdum at me is all they have left. Pathetic. Just pathetic.

Quote

Please. Most guys in here can see through his bullshit. The fact is that no one gives a f**k as much as you two homos. You're right the difference isn't that big anyway if any at all.

You don't "give a fuck" for two reasons: first, because you have no idea how much better sex would be if you had a prepuce. And secondly, because pride stops you from admitting that something terrible was done to you.

You're dead wrong if you think the difference is not dramatic. The only people entitled, to give an opinion to this regards, are those men who got mutilated in adult age. And the majority of them say there is a dramatic loss of sensation during sex. Think about it: a mutilated man has his penile glans frictioning against fabric 24/7: wouldn't that keratinize the glans tissue? Yes, it would. Conversely, the intact man has his glans covered most of the time, so it remains soft and sensitive. Furthermore, during the mutilation, the inner prepuce, with it's highly sensitive nerve endings, is also removed. You need to be insane to think it doesen't decrease penile erogenous sensations.

Quote

And as far as your statistics.. the only reason the number is going down is cause more blacks and latinos are reproducing at a faster rate than euro whites in this country or coming here illegally. Self respecting white parents still have their sons cut and there's nothing wrong with it.

There's something outrageously wrong with it: it's called human rights abuse and, even worse, child abuse. Caucasian Americans are ignorant. They have no idea what they're doing, to their sons, when they allow the sadistic man in white coat to drive a sharp scalpel to their genitals and, usually without anaesthesia, to cut off a healthy, functioning, erogenous, natural part of it.

The mutilation of boy-children is a pseudo-scientific practice, which has no health benefits for the child at all. it is a cruel and ancient religious ritual which had, at it's roots, not health as it's objective, but rather the obliteration of the future man's erogenous sensations - because sexual pleasure was deemed to be mundane -, as well as to appease a vengeful, pittiless God - see the Christian Bible for that.

Europeans are not mutilated - being more wholesome, sophisticated, civilized and educated peoples than Americans-, yet their rates of penile cancer, meatus ulceration, balanites and all the other ailments which mutilation supposedly cures, are much lower than that of the U.S.

Most American M.Ds are Jewish, so they are naturally biased to consider this barbarous mutilation, which started to practiced in the U.S in the 19th Century out of Puritanical fanaticism and not for medical reasons, to be of great medical value; hence, they biasedly proclaim it to be great for boys, even though, deep down, they know better. In fact, I suspect most mutilated men are envious of intact men; so, it is male pride that makes them say that being a mutilated half-man is great, and that they couldn't care any way.

Most MDs here are Jewish?? HAHA!! Yeah right. I've seen more Indian and Paki doctors here then Jews. I think you're thinking of lawyers, douchebag.

Pride? I'm envious now? Seriously, all my argument was about was that women like it better and yeah, I'm still right about that. All this bullshit about abuse and mutilation and loss of sensation sounds like a bunch of nothing to me and to the rest of us who don't go on anti-circumcision crusades on Getbig.com and who have more of a life then to worry about something that really isn't that serious and has, in no way, negatively affected our sex lives.

Most MDs here are Jewish?? HAHA!! Yeah right. I've seen more Indian and Paki doctors here then Jews. I think you're thinking of lawyers, douchebag.

Pride? I'm envious now? Seriously, all my argument was about was that women like it better and yeah, I'm still right about that. All this bullshit about abuse and mutilation and loss of sensation sounds like a bunch of nothing to me and to the rest of us who don't go on anti-circumcision crusades on Getbig.com and who have more of a life then to worry about something that really isn't that serious and has, in no way, negatively affected our sex lives.

More then anything it sounds like you're just whining.

You're so fucking stupid, you mutilated piece of shit, that I demean myself by even replying to you. Women like it better? Guess what? Wrong! Most of them couldn't care less one way or the other. Most men in the World, roughly 80%, are intact and have no problems getting laid. And even if this were the case, would you degrade yourself by cutting off a part of your dick to please them? Yes, you would. I am not mutilated like you, you retard, so I have no reasons to "whine". I only feel sorry for amputated half-man like you, who walk around with a butchered manhood. As for your mutilation not having affected your sex life...HA HA HA HA! Well, I guess that, to those who were born daltonic, not seeing the colors green and red is the epitome of eyesight. Keep enjoying that half-dick of yours, because you'll never know what you've missed.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

P.S 1: At 2% of the population, Jews represent 40% of medical students at elite universities, such as Harvard. They also represent 70% of the members of the AMA(American Medical Association).

P.S 2: From now on, I'll only reply to opponents who use: logic, medical data, statistics and/or ethical-philosophical arguments to debate me. Missives like the one from the mentally and genitally handicapped gentleman from above will be ignored. Insinuating that your opponent is:

hey Faust.circumcision is done here as a standard, simply because our main educational hospital is American (American University Hospital), So muslims and christians get circumcised in here.In the 100% muslim countries, I think they get circumcised too. Its more tradition then islam.(even that muslims don't know that).Islam prohibits mutilation of the body, it has a verse in Koraan that says that God's creation are perfect, and doing circumcision to "fix" something that God created is Blasphemy.But since most muslims themselves don't know their religion properly and those who does are quiet and only the crazy fanatics appears, crazy things will happen to the religion. too bad...

The little man arrived at the end of August.After reading these posts, reading up on it, and talking with my wife, we didn't have him circumsized/cut/mutilated/whatever.

Thank you for your decision! I hope all that typing I did influenced you in making it: if I helped save at least one boy child, it'll all be worth it! Unfortunately, the feminists and mutilated chivalrous bastard males will continue to mutilate boy children...