In one of the debates, I wish someone would ask Obama if he would support
capital punnishment "Death Penalty" if we were lucky enough to capture and
convict Osama Bin Ladin.

I have a feeling we would get the Mike Dukakis answer from Obama ........

Click to expand...

Does it really matter?

Personally, life in prison and not becoming a martyr, is a far harsher punishment for a muslim. And, just think, no 73 virgins, either.

And, just for discussion purposes, if Bush is ever convicted of crimes against humanity, maybe the two buddies and former business partners, could be cellmates. A fitting end for both of these terrorists.

This is probably why you will never be invited to a debate.. there is no question what will happen here.. the outcome is beyond the president.

Click to expand...

There were two general election Presidential debates in 1988. The first one was, by most everyone's account, uneventful. But the second debate, opening with CNN anchor Bernard Shaw's question to Michael Dukakis whether or not he would favor the death penalty for someone who raped and murdered his wife, was a crucial moment in the 1988 campaign. The question was meant to give Dukakis an opportunity to show emotion, but he blew it, and answered in a wooden, lawyerly manner. Bush did not make any serious gaffes, and effectively labeled Dukakis as a "liberal."

There were two general election Presidential debates in 1988. The first one was, by most everyone's account, uneventful. But the second debate, opening with CNN anchor Bernard Shaw's question to Michael Dukakis whether or not he would favor the death penalty for someone who raped and murdered his wife, was a crucial moment in the 1988 campaign. The question was meant to give Dukakis an opportunity to show emotion, but he blew it, and answered in a wooden, lawyerly manner. Bush did not make any serious gaffes, and effectively labeled Dukakis as a "liberal."

There were two general election Presidential debates in 1988. The first one was, by most everyone's account, uneventful. But the second debate, opening with CNN anchor Bernard Shaw's question to Michael Dukakis whether or not he would favor the death penalty for someone who raped and murdered his wife, was a crucial moment in the 1988 campaign. The question was meant to give Dukakis an opportunity to show emotion, but he blew it, and answered in a wooden, lawyerly manner. Bush did not make any serious gaffes, and effectively labeled Dukakis as a "liberal."

I guess you can adopt the title soothsayer now, to base something on what might happen, based on two very distinct personalities and incidents that occured 20 years ago now makes you superhuman..

Personally I think they should just kill him on the spot, to bring him to trial, or even let him rot in Cuba and all the crap that goes with it will make him a martyr to those who believe in him.. sometimes that is the way the world should work.

In one of the debates, I wish someone would ask Obama if he would support
capital punnishment "Death Penalty" if we were lucky enough to capture and
convict Osama Bin Ladin.

I have a feeling we would get the Mike Dukakis answer from Obama ........

Click to expand...

His Holy Highness Prince Barack Hussein Obama has made it quite clear that there are certain things he forbids the "Fawning Gushing Slobbering Masturbating Left Wing Media" to mention or inquire about, the three big ones are,
1-No matter what his wife says he doesn't want anybody to question it
2-Never mention his "love affair" with his spiritual advisor Uncle Jeremiah the Racist Anti American "Preacher"
3-This was the very first one, he made this clear the day he announced he was running, NEVER EVER MENTION HIS BIG F-CKING PING PONG PADDLE EARS.

Matthews, Olberman, Drunken Kennedys, Hollywood, MTV Perverts, Congress, Crips & Bloods, Muslim Community, Oprah, Jessie Jackoff, John Fonda Kerry and the old dried up Rodent Helen Thomas, they all got down on their knees and took a sacred vow to never ever publicly speak or even whisper any of Barack Hussein Obama's "off limit" subjects, especially the Ears.

Imagine going to the polls and voting for a person all those sh!theads support.

Mike Weasle Dukakis when on the subject of law abiding citizens having a gun in their home was also asked again "what he would do" if a savage broke into his house in the middle of the night and was in the act of Raping his wife, this looney squinty eyed worm who wanted to be president grinned and said
"he would run out the back door and look for a cop"----:singing:

I guess you can adopt the title soothsayer now, to base something on what might happen, based on two very distinct personalities and incidents that occured 20 years ago now makes you superhuman..

Personally I think they should just kill him on the spot, to bring him to trial, or even let him rot in Cuba and all the crap that goes with it will make him a martyr to those who believe in him.. sometimes that is the way the world should work.

Click to expand...

Earlier you wrote..... This is probably why you will never be invited to a debate.. there is no question what will happen here.. the outcome is beyond the president.

The question of capitol punnishment was the most important question of the 1988 debate. Why would you say there is no question that will happen here?

Maybe your right. The media did not favor candidates in 1988 as much as
they do today. I cannot see Chris Mathews asking Obama this type of question.

Also...."two very distinct personalities "....... I don't think so !
Dukakis and Obama are both left of the far left.......Two pees in a pod....

"Mr. Obama, as a constitutional lawyer, how do you reconcile giving driver's licenses and social security benefits to people who are not citizens of this country and who are here illegally stealing American jobs and driving down wages."

If I was to ask McCain one question it would probably be this:

"Mr. McCain. The invasion of Iraq was orchestrated by the neoconservative members of the Bush administration and PNAC organizations, and both of these organizations have loftier goals that involve a military dominance of the Middle East, that includes 58 permanent military bases in Iraq. You have close ties to several members of PNAC and in fact, several PNAC members are foreign policy advisors to your campaign.

Do you believe or support the charter of this organization and/or any of its ideas such as military dominance of the middle east?"