Shrewd, brutal, and a master at soliciting and spending aid money, Prime Minister Zenawi's 20 years of rule could be nearing its end.

Zenawi at the World Economic Forum in Addis Ababa.(Reuters)

Following the news of the past few years, you might get the
impression that flamboyance and bellicosity are signature traits of any
long-tenured dictator. But for every Muammar Qaddafi there's a Meles Zenawi,
the shrewd, technocratic Prime Minister of Ethiopia. Inside of the country,
he's known for imprisoning his political opponents, withholding
development assistance from restive areas, stealing
elections, and cracking
down on civil society NGOs. In the rest of the world, he's often praised for his
impressive economic record, though not
for his human rights. Zenawi has attracted Western support by being a responsible
steward of aid money, a security partner in a rough region, and a G20 summit
invitee.

From a human rights perspective, Zenawi's rule has been abusive,
heavy-handed, and self-interested. Still, his apparently earnest dedication to
sustainable development has long attracted international donors, whose money
has benefited Ethiopia while propping up his regime. Zenawi, has fostered a friendlier environment for foreign investment. Between 2000 and 2010, Ethiopia's GDP enjoyed a staggering average annual
growth rate of 8.8 percent -- China-like numbers. The country's public sector is
hardly clean of corruption, but the Ethiopian state isn't as mismanaged or as
predatory as others in the region. It ranks 120th out of 183 governments on
Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions index, not exactly
Scandinavian but still ahead of such regional leaders as Kenya, Uganda, and
Nigeria.

Under his leadership, Ethiopians have suffered from a lack of human, civil,
and political rights. At the same time, their country has earned a reputation
as a place where aid money can be responsibly and effectively spent. "The U.S.
assistance portfolio in Ethiopia remains one of the United States' largest and
most complex in Africa" according to an online
U.S. government profile of the roughly $2.1 billion in aid the U.S.
has sent to Ethiopia since 2010. The World Bank helps fund over $ 4.4 billion worth of
projects in the country.

This is the paradox of Zenawi's legacy. He has done much to
simultaneously help and hurt his people, with just the kind of
quiet skill that you hope to see in a benign leader and dread in a
malevolent one. If he never returns to office, should he be remembered as the technocrat
behind Ethiopia's amazing economic rise, or the brutal strongman who resisted
democracy as much of Africa adopted it? Though one did not necessarily require
the other -- a kinder, gentler Zenawi might have overseen even better growth --
the same character might inform both sides of his rule.

"When I meet with Prime Minister Meles
and [Ugandan] President [Yoweri] Museveni, I feel like I am attending development seminar," rockstar development economist Jeffrey Sachs
said in a
2004 speech. "They are ingenious, deeply knowledgeable, and bold." Magnus Taylor, the
managing editor of the Royal African Society's renowned African Arguments blog,
wrote about Zenawi's ability to
dazzle foreign investors at the World Economic Forum in Addis Ababa
this past May, while challenging the democratic world's seemingly dogmatic
belief in the causal relationship between political freedom and economic
dynamism:

Sitting astride this economic growth, and taking pride of place at
this year's WEF, was Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi. In an event that
boasted such political heavyweights as former British PM Gordon Brown, and
private sector luminaries like the Ivorian boss of The Prudential, Tidjane
Thiam, whose $600 billion worth of assets makes Ethiopia look like a minnow, I
was surprised by how much Meles came out as the dominant figure.
A fiercely intelligent man, with a grasp of figures redolent of
Brown (whom Meles referred to as 'Prime Minister' throughout) he seemed totally
in his element. Perhaps it was the nature of the audience. He was never going
to have to field too many tricky questions about Ethiopia's political space,
(un)free press or tight government control over telecommunications and banking
in front of a room full of CEOs and fellow technocrats.

One senses that in certain crowds his statement that "there is no
direct relationship between economic growth and democracy" would have got him
in to trouble - important players were gnashing their teeth at this but Meles,
kingpin of Western policy in the Horn of Africa, knows exactly how much he can
loosen his Marxist instincts without upsetting his donors.

The
World Economic Forum was one of Zenawi's last public appearances. Even if he
survives his illness, there is currently no public timetable for his return to
Addis Ababa. As dictators across North Africa and the Middle East can no longer
take their survival for granted, it's worth wondering whether Zenawi will be
the model for the next generation of enlightened, western-coddled autocrats -- or
one of the last of a literally dying breed.

About the Author

Most Popular

The legend of the Confederate leader’s heroism and decency is based in the fiction of a person who never existed.

The strangest part about the continued personality cult of Robert E. Lee is how few of the qualities his admirers profess to see in him he actually possessed.

Memorial Day has the tendency to conjure up old arguments about the Civil War. That’s understandable; it was created to mourn the dead of a war in which the Union was nearly destroyed, when half the country rose up in rebellion in defense of slavery. This year, the removal of Lee’s statue in New Orleans has inspired a new round of commentary about Lee, not to mention protests on his behalf by white supremacists.

The myth of Lee goes something like this: He was a brilliant strategist and devoted Christian man who abhorred slavery and labored tirelessly after the war to bring the country back together.

On August 21, the “moon” will pass between the Earth and the sun, obscuring the light of the latter. The government agency NASA says this will result in “one of nature’s most awe-inspiring sights.” The astronomers there claim to have calculated down to the minute exactly when and where this will happen, and for how long. They have reportedly known about this eclipse for years, just by virtue of some sort of complex math.

This seems extremely unlikely. I can’t even find these eclipse calculations on their website to check them for myself.

Meanwhile the scientists tell us we can’t look at it without special glasses because “looking directly at the sun is unsafe.”

Just seven months into his presidency, Trump appears to have achieved a status usually reserved for the final months of a term.

In many ways, the Trump presidency never got off the ground: The president’s legislative agenda is going nowhere, his relations with foreign leaders are frayed, and his approval rating with the American people never enjoyed the honeymoon period most newly elected presidents do. Pundits who are sympathetic toward, or even neutral on, the president keep hoping that the next personnel move—the appointment of White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, say, or the long-rumored-but-never-delivered departure of Steve Bannon—will finally get the White House in gear.

But what if they, and many other people, are thinking about it wrong? Maybe the reality is not that the Trump presidency has never gotten started. It’s that he’s already reached his lame-duck period. For most presidents, that comes in the last few months of a term. For Trump, it appears to have arrived early, just a few months into his term. The president did always brag that he was a fast learner.

An analysis of Stormfront forums shows a sometimes sophisticated understanding of the limits of ancestry tests.

The white-nationalist forum Stormfront hosts discussions on a wide range of topics, from politics to guns to The Lord of the Rings. And of particular and enduring interest: genetic ancestry tests. For white nationalists, DNA tests are a way to prove their racial purity. Of course, their results don’t always come back that way. And how white nationalists try to explain away non-European ancestry is rather illuminating of their beliefs.

Two years ago—before Donald Trump was elected president, before white nationalism had become central to the political conversation—Aaron Panofsky and Joan Donovan, sociologists then at the University of California, Los Angeles, set out to study Stormfront forum posts about genetic ancestry tests. They presented their study at the American Sociological Association meeting this Monday. (A preprint of the paper is now online.) After the events in Charlottesville this week, their research struck a particular chord with the audience.

More comfortable online than out partying, post-Millennials are safer, physically, than adolescents have ever been. But they’re on the brink of a mental-health crisis.

One day last summer, around noon, I called Athena, a 13-year-old who lives in Houston, Texas. She answered her phone—she’s had an iPhone since she was 11—sounding as if she’d just woken up. We chatted about her favorite songs and TV shows, and I asked her what she likes to do with her friends. “We go to the mall,” she said. “Do your parents drop you off?,” I asked, recalling my own middle-school days, in the 1980s, when I’d enjoy a few parent-free hours shopping with my friends. “No—I go with my family,” she replied. “We’ll go with my mom and brothers and walk a little behind them. I just have to tell my mom where we’re going. I have to check in every hour or every 30 minutes.”

Those mall trips are infrequent—about once a month. More often, Athena and her friends spend time together on their phones, unchaperoned. Unlike the teens of my generation, who might have spent an evening tying up the family landline with gossip, they talk on Snapchat, the smartphone app that allows users to send pictures and videos that quickly disappear. They make sure to keep up their Snapstreaks, which show how many days in a row they have Snapchatted with each other. Sometimes they save screenshots of particularly ridiculous pictures of friends. “It’s good blackmail,” Athena said. (Because she’s a minor, I’m not using her real name.) She told me she’d spent most of the summer hanging out alone in her room with her phone. That’s just the way her generation is, she said. “We didn’t have a choice to know any life without iPads or iPhones. I think we like our phones more than we like actual people.”

Antifa’s activists say they’re battling burgeoning authoritarianism on the American right. Are they fueling it instead?

Since 1907, Portland, Oregon, has hosted an annual Rose Festival. Since 2007, the festival had included a parade down 82nd Avenue. Since 2013, the Republican Party of Multnomah County, which includes Portland, had taken part. This April, all of that changed.

In the days leading up to the planned parade, a group called the Direct Action Alliance declared, “Fascists plan to march through the streets,” and warned, “Nazis will not march through Portland unopposed.” The alliance said it didn’t object to the Multnomah GOP itself, but to “fascists” who planned to infiltrate its ranks. Yet it also denounced marchers with “Trump flags” and “red maga hats” who could “normalize support for an orange man who bragged about sexually harassing women and who is waging a war of hate, racism and prejudice.” A second group, Oregon Students Empowered, created a Facebook page called “Shut down fascism! No nazis in Portland!”

Anti-Semitic logic fueled the violence over the weekend, no matter what the president says.

The “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville was ostensibly about protecting a statue of Robert E. Lee. It was about asserting the legitimacy of “white culture” and white supremacy, and defending the legacy of the Confederacy.

So why did the demonstrators chant anti-Semitic lines like “Jews will not replace us”?

The demonstration was suffused with anti-black racism, but also with anti-Semitism. Marchers displayed swastikas on banners and shouted slogans like “blood and soil,” a phrase drawn from Nazi ideology. “This city is run by Jewish communists and criminal niggers,” one demonstrator told Vice News’ Elspeth Reeve during their march. As Jews prayed at a local synagogue, Congregation Beth Israel, men dressed in fatigues carrying semi-automatic rifles stood across the street, according to the temple’s president. Nazi websites posted a call to burn their building. As a precautionary measure, congregants had removed their Torah scrolls and exited through the back of the building when they were done praying.

If the president is concerned about violence on the left, he can start by fighting the white supremacist movements whose growth has fueled its rise.

In his Tuesday press conference, Donald Trump talked at length about what he called “the alt left.” White supremacists, he claimed, weren’t the only people in Charlottesville last weekend that deserved condemnation. “You had a group on the other side that was also very violent,” he declared. “Nobody wants to say that.”

I can say with great confidence that Trump’s final sentence is untrue. I can do so because the September issue of TheAtlantic contains an essay of mine entitled “The Rise of the Violent Left,” which discusses the very phenomenon that Trump claims “nobody wants” to discuss. Trump is right that, in Charlottesville and beyond, the violence of some leftist activists constitutes a real problem. Where he’s wrong is in suggesting that it’s a problem in any way comparable to white supremacism.

The nation’s current post-truth moment is the ultimate expression of mind-sets that have made America exceptional throughout its history.

When did America become untethered from reality?

I first noticed our national lurch toward fantasy in 2004, after President George W. Bush’s political mastermind, Karl Rove, came up with the remarkable phrase reality-based community. People in “the reality-based community,” he told a reporter, “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality … That’s not the way the world really works anymore.” A year later, The Colbert Report went on the air. In the first few minutes of the first episode, Stephen Colbert, playing his right-wing-populist commentator character, performed a feature called “The Word.” His first selection: truthiness. “Now, I’m sure some of the ‘word police,’ the ‘wordinistas’ over at Webster’s, are gonna say, ‘Hey, that’s not a word!’ Well, anybody who knows me knows that I’m no fan of dictionaries or reference books.