2 WORKING PAPER SERIES NO 1084 / AUGUST 2009 WAGE DYNAMICS NETWORK HOW ARE FIRMS WAGES AND PRICES LINKED SURVEY EVIDENCE IN EUROPE 1 by Martine Druant 2, Silvia Fabiani 3, Gabor Kezdi 4, Ana Lamo 5, Fernando Martins 6 and Roberto Sabbatici 3 In 2009 all publications feature a motif taken from the 200 banknote. This paper can be downloaded without charge from or from the Social Science Research Network electronic library at 1 This paper has been prepared in the context of the Eurosystem Wage Dynamic Network (WDN) research project. We are very grateful to Giuseppe Bertola, Alan Blinder, Alan Krueger, Juan F. Jimeno, Hervé le Bihan, Julian Messina, Paolo Sestito, Frank Smets and seminar participants at the Bank of Spain and at the 2009 AEA meeting for their useful comments and suggestions. We also thank all members of the WDN survey group for their fruitful cooperation and Rebekka Christopoulou for her remarkable data assistance. The opinions expressed in the papers are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the institutions they belong to. Corresponding author: Silvia Fabiani 3. 2 National Bank of Belgium, boulevard de Berlaimont 14, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium; 3 Bank of Italy, Via Nazionale 91, I Rome, Italy; and 4 Central European University and Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Szabadság tér 8-9, H-1850 Budapest, V., Hungary; 5 European Central Bank, Kaiserstrasse 29, D Frankfurt am Main, Gemany; 6 Universidade Lusíada of Lisbon and Bank of Portugal; 1150 Lisbon, Portugal;

3 Wage Dynamics Network This paper contains research conducted within the Wage Dynamics Network (WDN). The WDN is a research network consisting of economists from the European Central Bank () and the national central banks (NCBs) of the EU countries. The WDN aims at studying in depth the features and sources of wage and labour cost dynamics and their implications for monetary policy. The specific objectives of the network are: i) identifying the sources and features of wage and labour cost dynamics that are most relevant for monetary policy and ii) clarifying the relationship between wages, labour costs and prices both at the firm and macro-economic level. The WDN is chaired by Frank Smets (). Giuseppe Bertola (Università di Torino) and Julian Messina (Universitat de Girona) act as external consultants and Ana Lamo () as Secretary. The refereeing process of this paper has been co-ordinated by a team composed of Gabriel Fagan (, chairperson), Philip Vermeulen (), Giuseppe Bertola, Julian Messina, Jan Babecký (CNB), Hervé Le Bihan (Banque de France) and Thomas Mathä (Banque centrale du Luxembourg). The paper is released in order to make the results of WDN research generally available, in preliminary form, to encourage comments and suggestions prior to final publication. The views expressed in the paper are the author s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the ESCB. European Central Bank, 2009 Address Kaiserstrasse Frankfurt am Main, Germany Postal address Postfach Frankfurt am Main, Germany Telephone Website Fax All rights reserved. Any reproduction, publication and reprint in the form of a different publication, whether printed or produced electronically, in whole or in part, is permitted only with the explicit written authorisation of the or the author(s). The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the European Central Bank. The statement of purpose for the Working Paper Series is available from the website, eu/pub/scientific/wps/date/html/index. en.html ISSN (online)

5 Abstract This paper presents new evidence on the patterns of price and wage adjustment in European firms and on the extent of nominal rigidities. It uses a unique dataset collected through a firm-level survey conducted in a broad range of countries and covering various sectors. Several conclusions are drawn from this evidence. Firms adjust wages less frequently than prices: the former tend to remain unchanged for about 15 months on average, the latter for around 10 months. The degree of price rigidity varies substantially across sectors and depends strongly on economic features, such as the intensity of competition, the exposure to foreign markets and the share of labour costs in total cost. Instead, country specificities, mostly related to the labour market institutional setting, are more relevant in characterising the pattern of wage adjustment. The latter exhibits also a substantial degree of time-dependence, as firms tend to concentrate wage changes in a specific month, mostly January in the majority of countries. Wage and price changes feed into each other at the micro level and there is a relationship between wage and price rigidity. Keywords: survey, wage rigidity, price rigidity, indexation, institutions, time dependent JEL Classification: D21, E30, J31 4

6 Non-technical summary This paper studies the frequency, timing and interaction of wage and price changes across firms, economic sectors and a broad range of European countries. It uses a new and unique cross-country dataset unprecedented by international standards in terms of both geographical and sectoral coverage based on an ad-hoc survey on wage and pricing policies at the firm level. The survey was developed within the Wage Dynamics Network (WDN), a research network grouping 23 central banks in the EU and coordinated by the European Central Bank. It was carried out by 17 national central banks (12 of which belonging to the euro area and 5 new EU member states) between the end of 2007 and the first half of 2008, on the basis of a harmonised questionnaire. Overall, more than 17,000 firms were interviewed. The uniqueness of this survey is at least twofold. First, its country coverage: given the large heterogeneity of labour markets across European countries, the harmonised questionnaire allows to widen our understanding of the effects of different labour market institutions and policies in price and wage setting practices. Second, the scope and richness of the information collected. In addition to information on price and wage setting and adjustments, the survey collects data on firms characteristics such as the sector of activity, size, structure of the product market, intensity of competitive pressures on this market, structure of the labour force and institutional features potentially affecting wage and labour policies. The survey can be regarded as the natural follow-up to some of the evidence on price behaviour revealed by the Inflation Persistence Network (IPN) (Altissimo et al., 2006; Fabiani et al., 2007). Indeed one of the most interesting findings of studies, conducted within the IPN, based on micro quantitative and survey data (Alvarez et al., 2006; Dhyne et al., 2007; Vermeulen, et al., 2007; Fabiani et al., 2006) is the substantial heterogeneity in the degree of price stickiness across products and sectors, related among many other factors to the variability of input costs and the cost structure at the firm and sectoral level. This evidence, albeit anecdotic, raises the question of whether the observed dispersion in the frequency of price changes is the result of wage inertial behaviour, placing firms wage setting policies at the heart of our research interests. Several dimensions of wage setting are explored in this paper, which focuses explicitly on how firms set and adjust prices and wages and on the relationship between the two policies. In particular, the paper aims at providing answers to the following questions: (i) How often are prices and base wages changed in Europe? (ii) Are adjustments synchronized or not and do they tend to take place in specific months of the year? (iii) Are there significant differences across firms, sectors and countries regarding the frequency and timing of wage and price changes and their relationship? (iv) If such differences are indeed present, how do they eventually relate to institutional and structural features such as the nature of wage negotiations, the presence of forms of indexation of wages to prices, the intensity of competitive pressures, the structure of the workforce, or the labour intensity of production as suggested by the IPN results? As to the frequency of adjustment, the paper shows that firms change wages less often than prices. The former tend to remain unchanged for about 15 months on average, while the latter for around 10 months (in line with previous estimates from the IPN). The cross-sectoral variation in the frequency of price adjustment is large compared to that of wage adjustment. Instead, country differences are larger for wage change frequencies than for price change frequencies. This evidence possibly reflects the fact that the economic context in which individual firms operate, which is likely to differ substantially across sectors, is crucial for pricing strategies, whereas the institutional setting, which is strongly country-specific, matters mostly in shaping wage adjustment 5

7 strategies. Indeed, a multivariate analysis of the determinants of price and wage rigidity at the firm level confirms that more frequent price adjustments are associated with higher intensity of competitive pressures and exposure to foreign markets, as well as with a lower share of labour costs on total costs (consistently, prices are found to be stickier in business services). Conversely, wages tend to be more flexible in the presence of firm-level collective wage agreements, whereas the stringency of employment protection legislation (EPL) and the coverage of collective agreements act in the opposite direction. There is also a correlation between frequency of wage changes and the presence of (formal or informal) indexation mechanisms of wages to inflation. The extent of wage and price rigidities is also related to the adjustment mechanisms adopted by firms, time-dependent strategies delivering, in general, higher rigidity. On average, 54 percent of firms report that wage changes are concentrated in a particular month, mostly January. On the contrary, only one-third of firms adopt time-dependent pricing rules. For both prices and wages the concentration of adjustments in specific months is significantly higher in euro area countries than in new EU member states. In the case of wages, this might reflect the more widespread adoption of indexation clauses in the euro area as well as the higher importance of collective wage agreements, which enhance coordinated wage adjustments. Various pieces of evidence confirm that wages and prices feed into each other at the micro level and that there is a relationship between wage and price rigidity. First, around half of the firms that change prices in January also change wages in that month. Second, 40 percent of the firms acknowledge a relationship (formal or informal) between the timing of their wage and price adjustment decisions. Third, when asked to assess the relevance of different adjustments policies to a common permanent unexpected increase in wages, about 60 percent of firms report that they would increase prices. Fourth, firm-level wage changes appear to be related to the general inflationary outlook, whether due to the existence of internal policies adapting wages to inflation or to the national institutional setting. Fifth, firms with a high labour cost share report a tighter link between price and wage changes and a lower frequency of price adjustment. Finally, even accounting for the likely simultaneity between price and wage changes, a statistically significant relationship is found, running from the frequency of wage changes to that of prices. The results presented in this paper can help to improve the calibration of New Keynesian macro models with price and wage stickiness. In particular, the implication of our empirical evidence regarding for instance average wage and price duration, synchronization between wage and price adjustment, the presence of a January effect, have started to be investigated more closely in the context of the WDN (see De Walque et al., 2009). It must be kept in mind, however, that the surveys were carried out in a period characterized by a relatively stable economic environment. Firms price and wage setting in the context of the recent exceptionally unstable economic and financial conditions is ongoing research. 6

8 Introduction This paper studies the frequency, timing and interaction of wage and price changes across firms, covering several economic sectors and a broad range of European countries. It provides new micro-founded evidence for models of wage and price staggering that have become very popular in New Keynesian DSGE models. The important role of labour markets in generating price rigidity in structural models is discussed for instance in Altissimo et al. (2006). By incorporating real wage rigidities, i.e. the slow adjustment of real wages to underlying market conditions, in the framework of a New Keynesian Philips Curve, these models seem to fit better the data. Approaching the analysis of price and wage dynamics simultaneously can also shed light on the impact of recent changes in labour market institutions on wage and labour cost dynamics. For example, it can provide useful insights on the sources behind the substantial degree of wage moderation observed in a number of European countries, which in turn could be potentially useful in terms of implications for monetary policy and structural reform. This paper uses a new and unique cross-country dataset unprecedented by international standards in terms of both geographical and sectoral coverage based on an ad-hoc survey on wage and pricing policies at the firm level. The survey was developed within the Wage Dynamics Network (WDN), a research network grouping 23 central banks in the EU and coordinated by the European Central Bank. It was carried out by 17 national central banks (12 of which belonging to the euro area and 5 new EU member states) between the end of 2007 and the first half of 2008, on the basis of a harmonised questionnaire that aimed at uncovering specific features of firm s price and wage setting policies and their relationships. Overall, more than 17,000 firms were interviewed, belonging to different size classes and operating in different sectors of the economy. The uniqueness of this survey is at least twofold. First, its country coverage: given the large heterogeneity of labour markets across European countries, the harmonised questionnaire allows to widen our understanding of the effects of different labour market institutions and policies in price and wage setting practices. Second, the scope and richness of the information collected. In addition to collecting information on both price and wage setting and adjustments, the survey collects information on firm s characteristics such as the sector of activity, its size, the structure of the product market in which it operates, the intensity of competitive pressures on this market, the structure of its labour force and institutional features potentially affecting its wage and labour policies. The use of surveys to investigate pricing policies was pioneered by the seminal work of Blinder (1991) and Blinder et al. (1998) and led to similar analyses in other countries as well as in the euro area, in the context of a previous research network grouping central banks of the Eurosystem, the Inflation Persistence Network (IPN; for the results, see Fabiani et al., 2007). The survey on which this paper is based can be regarded as the natural follow-up to some of the evidence on price behaviour revealed by the IPN (Altissimo et al., 2006; Fabiani et al., 2007). Indeed one of the most interesting finding of studies based on micro quantitative and survey data (see Alvarez et al., 2006; Dhyne et al., 2007; Vermeulen, et al., 2007; Fabiani et al., 2006) is the substantial heterogeneity in the degree of price stickiness across products and sectors, related among many other factors to the variability of input costs and the cost structure at the firm and sectoral level. This evidence, albeit anecdotic, raises the question of whether the observed dispersion in the frequency of price changes is the result of wage inertial behaviour, placing firms wage setting policies at the heart of our research interests. In the existing literature, surveys focused on wage setting at the firm level are mostly aimed at disentangling the existence and the reasons of downward wage rigidity; seminal works in this field are those by Blinder (1990), Agell and Lundborg (2003), Campbell and Kamlani (1997) and Franz and Pfeiffer (2006). This paper enriches this line of research by exploring other dimensions of wage 7

9 setting, focusing explicitly on how firms set and adjust prices and wages and on the relationship between wage and pricing policies and adjustments. 1 In particular, it aims at providing answers to the following questions: (i) How often are prices and base wages changed in Europe? Are adjustments synchronized or not and do they tend to take place in specific months of the year? (ii) Are there significant differences across firms, sectors and countries regarding the frequency and timing of wage and price changes and their relationship? If such differences are indeed present, how do they eventually relate to institutional and structural features such as the nature of wage negotiations, the presence of forms of indexation of wages to prices, the intensity of competitive pressures, the structure of the workforce, or the labour intensity of production as suggested by the IPN results? The structure of the paper is the following. Section 1 briefly presents the WDN survey and the data collected. Section 2 focuses on descriptive evidence on the frequency and timing of price and wage changes at the firm level, their relationship and the variation across countries and sectors. Section 3 investigates, within a multivariate econometric analysis, the role of various explanatory factors of price and wage changes at the firm level. Section 4 summarizes the main findings. 1 Data and sample The data used for this paper is a subset of the dataset collected by the WDN survey. It concentrates on 15 countries for which fully harmonised data are available; namely: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Ireland, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain. Although the national surveys were organized and carried out by each national central bank, the questionnaire and the target population of firms were very similar across countries. A core questionnaire was developed in a co-coordinated fashion within the WDN and was adopted by all participant countries with at most minor modifications. 2 Country-level micro data were pooled together into a common dataset. It covers firms employing more than 5 employees and operating in manufacturing, construction and services (trade, market services and financial intermediation). 3 Sample size, sampling probabilities and non-response patterns vary across countries as well as across sectors and firms size within countries. In general, studies based on survey data need to handle this heterogeneity. We adopt employment-adjusted weights, where the weight attached to each firm in the sample refers to how many employees that observation represents in the population. 4 Tables 1 and 2 present the sample composition by country, sector and firm size. Table 2 also shows the distribution based on the number of employees represented by the sample. The total number of firms is just below 15,000, representing almost 48 million employees. By design, the 1 Other studies produced in the context of the WDN investigate different dimensions of the survey. Babecky et al. (2008) focus on nominal and real wage rigidity by examining not only the issue of flexibility in base wages but also alternative margins of labour costs adjustment at the firm level. Bertola et al. (2008) analyse firms dominant adjustment strategies in reaction to unanticipated changes in demand, costs and wages and investigate some possible determinants underlying this choice. Galuscak et al. (2008) deal with the issue of wages of newly hired workers and investigate the relative importance of internal, external and institutional factors in this particular market. 2 An exception is Germany, where the data collected are not fully comparable. This explains why Germany is not included in our sample. 3 See Appendix 1 for details on the survey and on national samples and Appendix 2 for the questionnaire. Questions labelled as non-core refer to those questions that countries had the option not to include in their national questionnaires. 4 The weights are defined as the sum of all employees in the population in a sampling category (by country, sector, firm size category, perhaps region) divided by the number of observations (firms) in that category. They can also be thought of as the product of three fractions: the intended sampling probability, the response rate, and employees per firm. They add up to total employment in the population the sample represents. 8

10 sample is relatively balanced across firm size categories, and its sectoral distribution closely follows that of employment. Table 1 Sample composition by country Country Number of firms % AT BE 1, CZ EE ES 1, FR 2, GR HU 1, IE IT LT NL 1, PL PT 1, SI Total 14, Table 2 Sample composition by sector and size and the employment population represented (a) Number of observations >200 Total Number of firms: Manufacturing 887 1,271 2,267 1,778 6,203 Construction ,141 Trade 1, ,081 Market services 1,350 1,060 1, ,181 Financial services Total 3,912 3,415 4,520 3,093 14,940 Employees (thousands): Manufacturing Construction Trade Market services Financial services Total (b) Percentages >200 Total Number of firms: Manufacturing Construction Trade Market services Financial services Total Employees: Manufacturing Construction Trade Market services Financial services Total An advantage of this survey is that firms were directly asked about a number of features referring to the institutional setup within the firm or to the environment where it operates (e.g. the degree of competition or the existence of a policy at the firm level that adjusts wages to inflation). Information on these features is rarely available in administrative and other datasets. On the other hand, the survey suffers from several shortcomings inherent in ad hoc surveys, such as low rates of response and potential misunderstandings in interpreting the questions. Moreover, results may be 9

11 influenced by the specific economic situation prevailing in each country at that time interviews were carried out (around the end of 2007 and the beginning of 2008). 2 Price and wage adjustment: frequency, timing and interaction The adjustment mechanism of prices and wages followed by firms plays a crucial role on the transmission of economic shocks. In particular, the degree of price and wage rigidity determines the speed of adjustment of the economy and the amount of the related costs. A deep understanding of the extent and sources of rigidity is therefore of major importance for assessing the effects of monetary policy and calibrating macroeconomic models for policy analysis. Despite the relevance of the issue, available empirical evidence, comparable across countries and sectors, on the stickiness of wages is rather scarce. Concerning price adjustment, instead, studies conducted within the IPN revealed a somewhat high degree of stickiness in the euro area, as measured by the frequency of price changes, especially when compared to the United States. This finding was supported consistently by evidence based on both survey data (Fabiani et al. 2007) and quantitative micro consumer and producer price data (Dhyne et al. 2007; Vermeulen et al. 2007). Another important and robust result of these studies was the substantial heterogeneity of the frequency of price changes across products and sectors, which appears to be related, among other factors, to the variability in the cost structure at the firm and sectoral level, in particular in the relative importance of labour costs. 5 The information on price and wage adjustment collected by the WDN survey contributes to fill the gap related to the lack of data on wage policies at the firm level and to address the issue of the degree of price and wage stickiness simultaneously. In the rest of this section we present some descriptive evidence on three different aspects related to this issue: i) the frequency of wage and price changes; ii) the prevailing mechanism of adjustment (time vs. state dependence) and its timing; and iii) the extent to which wage changes feed into price changes and vice versa. 2.1 How often are prices and wages adjusted? The frequency of price and wage changes provides a rough measure of the extent of nominal rigidities which are, among other things, an essential ingredient in the calibration of standard DSGE models with staggered adjustment mechanisms that are widely used for monetary policy analysis (see, among others, Woodford, 2003, Gali et al. 2003, Smets and Wouters, 2003). On this issue, the WDN survey explicitly asked firms about the frequency of price changes for their main product (see Appendix 2, question 31) and of wage changes for their main occupational group (question 9). In the former case, firms could choose between the following range of categories: daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, twice a year, once a year, less frequently than once a year, other. The frequency of wage adjustment was instead tackled through three separate questions capturing different types of wage changes: those due to factors unrelated to tenure and/or inflation, those due to tenure and those due to inflation. The exact wording of the question in each case is the following: How frequently is the base wage of an employee belonging to the main occupational group in your firm typically changed?. Respondents could choose from the options: more than once a year; once a year; once every two years; less frequently than once every two years; never / don t know. 5 Consumer price data and survey results show that prices are changed least often in the services sector. Producer price data suggest that the frequency of price changes is highest for those products that have not undergone many transformations and, hence, whose costs are closely linked to the typically rather volatile raw material prices. A similar heterogeneity across sectors is found in the United States. 10

12 In the analysis of the answers concerning price setting, we aggregate the first three options, on the one hand, and the fourth and fifth, on the other, and end up with four categories: daily to monthly, quarterly to half-yearly, yearly and less frequent than yearly. As for wages, we aggregate the third and fourth categories into a single one, which we label as less frequently than once a year. In order to simplify the description of results, in the rest of this paper we consider a synthetic measure, defined as the highest frequency of firm-level wage change among the three types described above (due to factors unrelated to tenure and/or inflation, due to tenure; due to inflation). Table 3 - Frequency of price and wage changes across sectors (percentages) PRICES Daily to monthly quarterly to half yearly yearly less frequently than once a year no pattern Total Manufacturing Construction Trade Market services Financial services Standard deviation 7,6 4,1 9,7 2,5 4,7 WAGES (for any reason) more frequently than once a year yearly less frequently than once a year never/don't know Total Manufacturing Construction Trade Market services Financial services Standard deviation 4,5 0,9 4,7 0,9 Notes: Figures weighted by employment weights, rescaled excluding non-responses. Tables 3 and 4 show that in general price adjustments are more frequent than wage adjustments. About half of the firms change prices once a year or less frequently; a quarter do it more often, while the remaining ones do not report any particular pattern. Wages are changed less frequently: for 85 percent of firms once a year or less often, only for 12 percent more often. The disaggregation by sector and country reveals a substantially higher dispersion in the frequency of price adjustment across sectors than across countries, whereas the opposite is true in the case of wage adjustment. Firms in manufacturing and market services adjust prices much less often that those in trade and financial services, while construction is the sector with the highest fraction of firms reporting no regular pattern in price revisions (Table 3). 6 As regards wages, the cross-sectoral variation is lower. Wage changes are least frequent in trade and business services, more frequent in manufacturing and most frequent in construction. Even in this latter sector, though, 60 percent of the firms report adjustments at the yearly frequency and only 22 percent at a higher frequency. 7 When looking at differences across countries, the top panel of Table 4 shows that the variability in the frequency of price changes is lower than across sectors. Poland, Lithuania, Ireland and the Netherlands are the countries with the highest fraction of firms revising prices more than once a year, whereas Hungary, Spain and France are those with the lowest; for the whole euro area, this fraction is 22 percent, about ten percentage points lower than for the non-euro area aggregate. 6 When interpreting the results concerning financial services, a note of caution regards, on the one hand, the concept of price, which might be difficult to capture for respondents, and, on the other, the fact that in most countries interviews were carried out in a period of exceptional turbulence on international financial markets. 7 A comparable analysis has been done by size classes, as defined in Section 1. Differences in frequencies of price and wage changes by firms' size turn out to be negligible. 11

13 Substantial cross-country variation is instead observed in the case of wages (bottom panel in Table 4). Lithuanian, Greek and Slovenian firms adjust base wages most frequently, followed by Belgium, France and Estonia, while Hungary, Italy and Portugal are the countries with the lowest fraction of firms changing wages more often than yearly. The modal frequency is one year in all countries except Italy and Lithuania. Despite the large differences across individual countries, the frequency distribution is broadly similar when one compares the euro-area and non-euro area aggregates. Table 4 - Frequency of price and wage changes across countries (percentages) PRICES daily to quarterly to less frequently yearly monthly half yearly than once a year no pattern Total Euro area Austria Belgium France Greece Ireland Italy Netherlands Portugal Slovenia Spain Non- Euro Area Czech Republic Estonia Hungary Lithuania Poland Standard deviation WAGES (for any reason) more frequently less frequently never/don't yearly Than once a year than once a year know Total Euro area Austria Belgium France Greece Ireland Italy Netherlands Portugal Slovenia Spain Non- Euro Area Czech Republic Estonia Hungary Lithuania Poland Standard deviation Notes : Figures weighted by employment weights, rescaled excluding non-responses. The split up between frequencies of wage changes has to be interpreted differently for Greece, as the options never/don't know were not allowed in the Greek questionnaire. Overall, the higher dispersion in the frequency of price adjustment across sectors than across countries suggests that product market characteristics (e.g. the degree of competition, the exposure to foreign competitive pressures, the cost structure, etc.) are important determinants of firms 12

14 pricing behaviour and potential sources of the degree of price stickiness. Conversely, the strong heterogeneity across countries that emerges with regard to wage change frequencies is a sign that the institutional setting, in particular the bargaining mechanisms, their coverage and their degree of centralisation, may be important forces behind the rigidity of wages. For instance in Italy, though expected inflation is embedded in wage negotiations, the latter are mostly centralised and carried out every two years; hence, firms consistently report very rare infra-annual wage adjustments. The evidence on the frequency of adjustment discussed so far can also be summarised through an alternative measure of nominal rigidity, i.e. the number of months for which prices and wages remain unchanged ( duration ). The computation of the duration indicator is still based on the answers concerning the frequency of price and wage changes but requires additional specific assumptions. In particular, whereas most of those answers directly translate into durations (e.g. once a year translates into a duration of 12 months), a few of them refer to intervals (e.g. less frequently than once every two years ). In order to impute expected durations in these latter cases, we assume that the underlying distribution of durations is lognormal (with different moments for prices and wages), we estimate the parameters of the distributions from the other answers, and compute the conditional expectations for these categories. The results on duration should, therefore, be regarded as approximations, as the imputations are based on untestable distributional assumptions (see Appendix 3 for details). The impact of these assumptions on the estimates reported below is, however, quite negligible, as they concern only a minority of answers. 8 Another important qualification is that price durations are not computed for around one-fourth of firms that report no pattern to the question on the frequency of price changes. A similar omission applies to wage changes, since wage durations are not computed for firms that report never/don t know to the question on the frequency of wage changes; however, in this case it is much less relevant since it concerns only 3 percent of the firms. Table 5 shows that wages in European firms remain unchanged, on average, longer than prices (15 months against around 10). The estimate for prices is in line with the evidence emerged from the studies conducted within the IPN, which point to marginally longer durations: 11 months on the basis of survey data and around 13 months on the basis of micro-consumer price data. This slight difference might be related to both the fact that the sample of countries for which data are available is larger in the WDN survey and that the period in time to which data refer is different. Looking at sectoral differences, our results reveal that prices set by manufacturers and business services firms tend to remain unchanged on average for just less than one year, whereas those set in trade and financial services seem to be more flexible, with durations of 7 and 8 months, respectively. Conversely, average wage durations vary much less across sectors, with a low of 13 months in construction to a high of 15 in trade. No remarkable differences emerge in price durations between euro area and non-euro area countries. In the case of wages, the relatively higher duration recorded for the euro area aggregate is entirely due to Italy, where wages remain unchanged for around 2 years, consistently with the wage bargaining institutional setup (see Du Caju et al. 2008), whereas in all the remaining countries average duration is almost 12 months. 8 The robustness of the results reported below has been assessed by computing duration measures under alternative assumptions concerning the number of months corresponding to the frequency intervals that do not directly translate into a point estimate. These robustness tests are not shown here but are available from the authors upon request. 13

15 Table 5 Estimated average duration of price and wage spells (months) Prices Wages Total Manufacturing Construction Trade Market services Financial intermediation Euro area Austria Belgium Spain France Greece Ireland Italy Netherlands Portugal Slovenia Non-Euro area Czech Republic Estonia Hungary Lithuania Poland Notes: Figures weighted by employment weights, rescaled excluding non-responses. 2.2 The timing of adjustment In addition to the frequency of price and wage adjustment, and partly related to it, another indicator that signals the presence and extent of nominal rigidities is the nature of the adjustment itself. In order to account for the fact that individual firms do not continuously change their prices and wages in response to all the relevant shocks that hit them, in the literature firms strategies are modelled either as a time-dependent process, where the timing of the adjustment is exogenously given and does not depend on the state of the economy, or as a state-dependent one. In presence of frequent shocks, the former might lead to stickier prices and wages than the latter, provided that the time frame is quite large and the cost of adjustment is low enough. Hence, which of the two approaches reflects better firms actual behaviour has important implications for monetary policy makers. 9 In particular, the degree of bunching of wage setting decisions may have an impact on the transmission of monetary policy decisions to the real economy. For instance, Olivei and Tenreyro (2008) show that in Japan, where most firms set their wages between February and May, in what is known as Shunto, a monetary policy shock occurring in the first part of the year should produce a smaller impact on real activity, since this is a period of more flexible wages, than a shock occurring later in the year. Olivei and Tenreyro (2007) derive similar results for the U.S. where wage changes concentrate at the turn of the year; they find that monetary policy shocks that take place in the second half of the year have insignificant effects on aggregate activity. With a view on obtaining more empirical evidence on these issues, in the WDN survey firms were asked to specify whether their wage and price changes take place with no predefined pattern or 9 According to IPN results, firms' price setting is characterized by elements of both time and state dependence: on average 34 percent of firms use purely time-dependent rules, whereas around two-thirds adopt a mixed strategy (as in Sheshinski and Weiss 1977). Most price adjustments occur at the beginning of the year (January) and after the summer period (especially in September). 14

16 are concentrated in particular month(s) (see Appendix 2, questions 10 and 32). The results reported in Figure 2 show that time-dependent wage adjustment is significantly more widespread as a rule adopted by firms than time-dependent price adjustment. Indeed, the fraction of firms that typically change wages in specific months is 54 percent, whereas in the case of prices it amounts to 35 percent. Among these firms, there appears to be a considerable degree of synchronisation in the timing of both price and wage change, with significant clustering in January. In the case of wage adjustment, smaller peaks also appear in July and April. Figure 2 - Timing of wage and price changes at the firm level (percentages of firms reporting to change wages/prices in a particular month) 54% of firms change wages in a typical month 35% of firms change prices in a typical month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Notes: Figures weighted by employment weights, rescaled excluding non-responses. 60 Figure 3 Time-dependent price and wage adjustment across sectors (percentages of firms reporting to change wages/prices in a particular month) Prices Wages Total Manufacturing Construction Trade Market services Financial services Total Manufacturing Construction Trade Market services Financial services Notes: Figures weighted by employment weights, rescaled excluding non-responses. Looking at the sectoral dimension, the variability in the adoption of regular time-dependent rules in price revisions is quite remarkable, consistently with the high dispersion found in the frequency of the revisions themselves. The concentration in particular months is least common in financial services and more widespread in market services (Figure 3); in all sectors January is the month when the largest part of price changes occurs. Conversely, the pattern of concentration of wage changes is very similar across sectors, although slightly below average in construction and 15

17 trade. Also in this case, wage adjustments occur mostly in January in all sectors, though July also has some significance in manufacturing and market services and more staggering across different months is detected in financial services. While in all sectors wage changes are generally more timedependent than price changes, the difference is particularly pronounced in financial intermediation, where only 12 percent of firms follow this type of rule for prices, as against 59 percent for wages. The finding that time-dependent adjustment mechanisms are more widespread for wages than for prices might be related to the existence of wage indexation mechanisms in some countries, as well as to the presence of institutional arrangements within the firm itself or at the national or sectoral level. Indeed, the cross-country differences in both the incidence of time-dependence and the timing of wage changes are quite remarkable. Lithuania is the country with the lowest fraction of wage changes concentrated in specific months (17 percent); at the other extreme Portugal has the highest fraction (94 percent). This indicator of relative wage rigidity is consistent with the respectively high and low frequency of wage adjustment found in the two countries (see Section 1). More generally, the percentage of firms that adopt time-dependent wage rules exceeds 70 percent in Spain, the Netherlands, France and Greece and is overall much higher for euro area countries (61 percent) than for non-euro area ones (34 percent), possibly in relation to the more widespread diffusion of collective bargaining agreements and indexation clauses in the euro area. There appears to be a significant geographical variability also in the timing of wage adjustments. Although in all economies the majority of time-dependent wage changes occur in January, other specific months are indicated by relatively large shares of firms: July in Belgium, France and Lithuania; May in Austria; August in Slovenia, April in Ireland and September in Greece. These country-specificities in the time-patterns of wage change are confirmed both by micro wage data available at an infra-annual level and by the analysis of collective agreements carried out in the context of the WDN (see Du Caju et al., 2008), showing that the monthly pattern of wage changes is linked to the timing of wage negotiations. 10 Some variation across countries can also be observed in the pervasiveness of time-dependent pricing, albeit less pronounced than in the case of wages (Figure 4). Overall, the fraction of euro area firms that carry out price adjustments with a regular timing is higher than in non-euro area countries as a whole (42 vs 17 percent, respectively). In all economies, most price changes occur in January. 100 Figure 4 Time-dependent price and wage adjustment across countries (percentages of firms reporting to change wages/prices in a particular month) Prices Wages Total AT BE FR GR IE IT NL PT SI SP CZ EE HU LT PO Euro Area Non-Euro Area Total AT BE FR GR IE IT Notes: Figures weighted by employment weights, rescaled excluding non-responses. NL PT SI SP CZ EE HU LT PO Euro Area Non-Euro Area 10 The peak in the frequency of wage change in the beginning of each year emerges also from other studies conducted within the WDN on the basis of micro quantitative data for a number of individual countries (Knell and Stiglbauer 2008 for Austria; Heckel et al for France, Lünnemann and Wintr 2008 for Luxembourg). 16

18 2.3 The interaction between wage and price adjustment Having assessed the degree of rigidity of wages and prices as captured by the frequency and the nature of the adjustment process, we focus explicitly on the interaction between wage and pricing policies at the firm level. In this context we address both the issue of whether firms wage and price adjustment are related (and the causal link between the two) and the extent to which they actually feed into each other. The WDN survey provides direct information on various aspects of this relationship, such as the link between price and wage changes at the firm level, the response of the former to wage shocks, the existence and nature of internal policies adjusting wages to inflation and the frequency of wage changes due to inflation. One of the findings stemming from the analysis in Section 2.2 is that there appears to be some broad synchronisation between the timing of price and wage changes, with peaks in January in both cases. Indeed, when looking at individual firms, it turns out that around half of those that change prices in January also adjust wages in the same month. This evidence is confirmed by the fact that, when explicitly asked about how the timing of price changes relates to that of wage changes within their company (see Appendix 2, question 33), around 40 percent of firms acknowledge the existence of some relationship between the two (Figure 5). However, only 15 percent state that this relationship is relatively strong. For half of them decisions on price changes follow those on wage changes. The opposite holds for another 3 percent, while decisions are simultaneous in the remaining 4 percent. The patterns with respect to intensity and direction of the relationship are very similar across sectors and across countries. Figure 5 - The relationship between wage and price changes at the firm level (percentages) no link link but no particular pattern decisions are taken simultaneously price changes follow wage changes wage changes follow price changes Notes: Figures weighted by employment weights, rescaled excluding non-responses. The finding that the majority of firms (60 percent) does not explicitly recognise a direct relationship between their typical price and wage change decisions does not automatically imply that the two policies are not related. Indeed, other pieces of evidence arising from the WDN survey suggest that wages and prices feed into each other at the micro level. The existence and extent of the pass-through of wages into prices can be gauged by analysing the strategies firms declare to implement in reaction to shocks. Indeed, when asked to assess the relevance of different adjustments policies to a common permanent unexpected increase in wages about 60 percent of firms reported that they would increase prices (see Table 6 and, 2009). 17

19 The possible options they could choose among where: i) a reduction in (other) costs; ii) an adjustment of prices; iii) a reduction of profit margins; iv) a reduction in output. In a study also based on the WDN survey, Bertola et al. (2008) argue that the pass-through of wages into prices is particularly strong in firms with a high labour share, confirming previous evidence from the IPN that prices are stickier in sectors typically characterised by a high incidence of labour costs. Conversely, the extent to which wages feed into prices is inversely related to the intensity of competitive pressures faced by the firms, their exposure to foreign markets and their size. 11 Additional empirical evidence, based on alternative data and methods, of wage changes having a substantial impact on price dynamics at the firm level is rather limited. Studies carried out in the context of the WDN, focused on national micro data, find in general a significant but very low elasticity of prices to wages or labour costs (see Loupias and Sevestre, 2008; Rosolia and Venditti, 2008; Carlsson and Nordstrom Skans, 2008). Table 6 Adjustment strategies to shocks (firms answering "relevant" or "very relevant", percentages) Cost-push shock Wage shock Demand shock Reduce (other) costs Adjust prices Reduce margins Reduce output Notes: Figures weighted by employment weights, rescaled excluding nonresponses. Greece is excluded from all the calculations and in addition Italy and Spain are excluded in the case of a demand shock. Turning to the evidence concerning the impact of prices on wages, an important element is the extent and speed to which wage changes in the firms are related to the general inflationary outlook. The existence and strength of this relationship is determined both by companies internal strategies adapting wages to inflation and by the characteristics of the national institutional settings, in particular the presence or not of indexation rules. The nature of these mechanisms specific to the firm or set at the national level, formal or informal, forward or backward looking is, hence, of extreme relevance from a policy perspective. Two questions on this issue were included in the survey (see Appendix 2, questions 6 and 7). Firms were first asked whether or not they have an internal policy that adapts changes in base wages to inflation. If so, they had to report whether the adjustment (a) is automatic or not, (b) is subject to a formal rule, (c) refers to past or expected inflation ( backward or forward looking). Figure 6 shows that on average only one-third of the firms have an internal policy adapting wages to inflation. Among them, nearly half adopt an automatic indexation mechanism, mostly of a backward looking nature, while the other half takes inflation into account without applying any formal rule. There is some variability across sectors: the existence of an internal indexation policy is less common in market services and more widespread in financial intermediation and construction. Table 7 summarises the information on formal and informal indexation mechanisms at the firm level across countries. It shows that the adjustment of wages to inflation is very common in Belgium and Spain (98 and 70 percent, respectively), where automatic indexation mechanisms are prevalent. Dutch and Italian firms, on the other hand, do not (or do it only marginally) adapt wages to inflation. In the remaining countries these internal mechanisms, mostly informal, are used to some extent. Expected inflation is more relevant for wage setting than past inflation only in Portugal. 12 Overall, informal policies that link base wages to inflation are more widespread in non- 11 All these results are confirmed by the multivariate regression analysis reported in Section In the case of Germany, firms were not explicitly asked whether or not they have a policy that adapts changes in base wages to inflation. Nevertheless, when asked about the two main factors that determined the most recent wage increases, 27 percent of German firms replies that inflation was one of them. 18

20 euro area countries than in euro area ones, while the opposite holds in the case of formal automatic adjustment mechanisms. Figure 6 - Adjustment of base wages to inflation across sectors (percentages) Manufacturing Construction Trade Market services Financial interm Total automatic (past infl.) autom atic (exp. infl.) no form al rule (past infl.) no form al rule (exp. Infl) no link Notes: Figures weighted by employment weights, rescaled excluding non-responses. The firm-level evidence reported so far complements information available from other sources on indexation at the country and sectoral level. The dataset on wage bargaining institutions collected within the WDN (see Du Caju et al., 2008) provides an overview of existence and coverage of formal wage indexation mechanisms across countries, developing a summary indicator of country-level indexation. According to this measure, reported in the last column of Table 7, workers are to some extent covered by formal wage indexation clauses in only seven of the countries examined here, coverage being particularly high in Belgium and Spain, low in Slovenia and very low in Austria, France, Italy and Poland. Table 7 - Adjustment of base wages to inflation: country overview (1) (percentages) Firm-level policies (2) Automatic link to inflation No formal rule, but inflation considered Past Expected Past Expected Total Country-level indexation (3) AT Very low BE High CZ None EE None ES High FR Very low GR None HU None IE None IT Very low LT NL None PL Very low PT None SI Low Total Euro area Non Euro area Notes: (1) Since some firms use a number of different methods of adjustment to inflation, the total may not be equal to the sum of the four methods. (2) Figures weighted by employment weights, rescaled excluding non-responses. (3) Percentage of workers covered by wage indexations clauses: Very low: 1-25%; Low: 26-50%; Moderate: 51-75%; High: % (Source: Du Caju et al., 2008). 19

Employment Policy Department EMPLOYMENT Working Paper No. 162 2014 At work but earning less: Trends in decent pay and minimum wages for young people Damian Grimshaw Employment and Labour Market Policies

RESEARCH A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Apprenticeships and Other Vocational Qualifications Steven McIntosh Department of Economics University of Sheffield Research Report RR834 Research Report No 834 A Cost-Benefit

JCMS 2006 Volume 44. Number 2. pp. 391 417 Who Has Power in the EU? The Commission, Council and Parliament in Legislative Decisionmaking* ROBERT THOMSON Trinity College, Dublin MADELEINE HOSLI Leiden University

Working Paper SerieS NO 1594 / september 2013 Is there a role for domestic demand pressure on export performance? Paulo Soares Esteves and António Rua the Competitiveness Research Network In 2013 all ECB

WAGES AND INCENTIVES IN THE PORTUGUESE PUBLIC SECTOR* Maria Manuel Campos** Manuel Coutinho Pereira** 1. INTRODUCTION The need to understand and assess the personnel management practices in the Portuguese

Working Paper SerieS NO 1643 / March 2014 Has US Household Deleveraging Ended? A Model-Based Estimate of Equilibrium Debt Bruno Albuquerque, Ursel Baumann and Georgi Krustev In 2014 all ECB publications

University Autonomy in EuropE II The Scorecard By Thomas Estermann, Terhi Nokkala & Monika Steinel Copyright 2011 European University Association All rights reserved. This information may be freely used

WORKING PAPER SERIES NO 687 / OCTOBER 2006 CREDIT GROWTH IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE NEW (OVER)SHOOTING STARS? by Balázs Égert, Peter Backé and Tina Zumer WORKING PAPER SERIES NO 687 / OCTOBER 2006 CREDIT

Potential Migration from Central and Eastern Europe into the EU-15 An Update Report for the European Commission, DG Employment and Social Affairs Patricia Alvarez-Plata Herbert Brücker (Coordinator) Boriss

ISSN 1831-2802 MAIN DEVELOPMENTS REPORT ON Equality between women and men 2009 1 European Commission REPORT ON Equality between women and men 2009 European Commission Directorate-General for Employment,

NEETs Young people not in employment, education or training: Characteristics, costs and policy responses in Europe NEETs Young people not in employment, education or training: Characteristics, costs and

ISSN 1831-2802 REPORT ON Equality between women and men 2010 European Commission REPORT ON Equality between women and men 2010 European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and

Psychosocial risks in Europe Prevalence and strategies for prevention A joint report from the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions and the European Agency for Safety

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO WORKING PAPER SERIES Do People Understand Monetary Policy? Carlos Carvalho PUC-Rio and Kyros Investimentos Fernanda Nechio Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco April

chapter 13 The DOG ThaT DIDN T BarK: has INFLaTION BeeN MUZZLeD Or WaS IT JUST SLeepING? Is there any point to which you would wish to draw my attention? To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.