Why does preference make them retarded. You can say the exact same thing about battling a gun rapper in NY. Different areas have different style preferences.

Click to expand...

Now go back to what I first said bro:
"Another fact is that judges are often retarded. I can't say I'd "put up" money against a comedian battler either. Especially in Canada.

It's just not a smart business decision."

Now why do I say judges are often retarded? That's because judges will always have preferences. It's a judge's job to IGNORE those preferences when judging a battle. However... judges are often retarded. They don't know their job, they think it's just to give their opinion. No; we don't care about your opinion because it's not important in the slightest. We're asking you to judge a battle. I actually may make a thread about this because I feel it's very important for people to realize this... the fact that they're so dense amazes me.

If I was judging Head ICE vs Cortez, I would've given it to Cortez. I enjoyed Head ICE more, and preferred his style, but the obvious victor of the battle was Cortez.

Who put more effort into their verses? Who was more efficient with their style, and put it all to the best use? These are things judges should take into consideration, NOT what style did I like more. LMAO what's the point of judges if it's just a big opinion party? Everyone is capable of an opinion, what makes theirs important? Nothing.

So now back to the topic at hand. Having known that judges don't know what their real job is... would you put their money in their hands when they're incapable of even knowing what we ask of them?

Now go back to what I first said bro:
"Another fact is that judges are often retarded. I can't say I'd "put up" money against a comedian battler either. Especially in Canada.

It's just not a smart business decision."

Now why do I say judges are often retarded? That's because judges will always have preferences. It's a judge's job to IGNORE those preferences when judging a battle. However... judges are often retarded. They don't know their job, they think it's just to give their opinion. No; we don't care about your opinion because it's not important in the slightest. We're asking you to judge a battle. I actually may make a thread about this because I feel it's very important for people to realize this... the fact that they're so dense amazes me.

If I was judging Head ICE vs Cortez, I would've given it to Cortez. I enjoyed Head ICE more, and preferred his style, but the obvious victor of the battle was Cortez.

Who put more effort into their verses? Who was more efficient with their style, and put it all to the best use? These are things judges should take into consideration, NOT what style did I like more. LMAO what's the point of judges if it's just a big opinion party? Everyone is capable of an opinion, what makes theirs important? Nothing.

So now back to the topic at hand. Having known that judges don't know what their real job is... would you put their money in their hands when they're incapable of even knowing what we ask of them?

no i will give charron credit he has potential. In his Jwalker and Sandman battles he was good and i think they are still his best battles and he showed potential (he was still spitting some wack filler "why would you wear that outside and comb your hair with such pride? wtf?) but he has some bodybag stuff like that john ritter/bitch of the dot scheme. Then he caught the HFK bug and now thinks hes the class clown and i cant watch him im sorry