A little background on me: I was born profoundly deaf to a hearing family. My deafness was caused by a defect in the corodoxin-something gene, and is my only physical flaw. My brain was not affected (as sometimes happens with genetic deafness), and I have an IQ level of 173.

My parents decided to enroll me in a state school for the deaf from childhood, where I learned signing, writing and speech. I remained in that school from kindergarten to midway through high school, when I finally got fed up with the sub-par education and transferred to a public high school, where I am in my junior year now.

I never could get the catch of speaking fluently, no matter how hard I tried. My speech is halting and monotonous, and it's quite tiring and painful for me to speak for any length of time. Strangely, I have the same problem with ASL (American Sign Language), and I prefer not to sign either. I usually only use speech when I must, and rely on the written word, in which I am very fluent.

I despise the ADA and interpreters, and I never use interpreters. I learn at school mostly by teaching myself out of the textbook. I stay out of work fields where physical human contact is required, and I plan to become a self-employed mechanical engineer. I am a self-reliant loner.

Since I have double recessive genes for deafness, I have committed myself to never reproduce, and prevent my genes from being carried down into the gene pool by my children.

I believe that deafness does not hamper my ability to contribute to society through physical and mental labor; rather, I view it as more of a communicative disability.

Many, many people have told me that if I truly believed in National Socialism, I should just kill myself. I do not do so because I believe that I can do more for the Cause alive than dead.

So, what is your view on self-reliant disabled people who do not reproduce like me? It's not just deafness, but any disability that does not hamper productivity, such as cleft lips and the like.

I believe that any people with a serious disability, such as cerebal palsy, mental retardation, and autism should be euthanizied if they are unable to support themselves.

I also believe that people with any genetic disability of any kind should be sterilizied to prevent contamination of the gene pool.

Obviously, sterilization does not apply to enviromental disability (deafness through fever, chainsaw accident, etc.) although the euthanization rule still applies.

an iq of 173 is so rare that i have to ask - was this measured in america? (on air india flights, when they land at kennedy, the attendants always announce "please set your watches back 12 hours and your iqs forward 30").

now, there is nothing to prevent you reproducing. we have the technology to detect your condition in potential partners: just don't mate with someone who has the allele, or be prepared to abort a homozygous child.

i've seen enough of the consequences of disability to know that we're not doing anyone any favors by keeping the majority of them alive. if we had any sense, we'd say to the activists - if you're so fond of them, take one home and raise it yourself, on your dime.

as for adapting our society to accommodate the slowest, stupidest, least competent - why have society at all? i often think that if we'd spent 1% of the money we've spent on wheelchair ramps, wide doors and potty handles on dedicated research, we'd have invented replacement legs by now. (if you don't believe me, give me 1% of the 1% and i'll do it myself, altho it would take me 2 years, during which i have much more important things to do).

in time to come, i sincerely hope we do something active to discourage the breeding of anyone with a (true) iq of less than 110.

I have a question concerning sterilizing and euthanizing people with disabilities.

If we do this, would this not prevent us from using medicine, science, research and technology in order to find ways to correct and overcome these problems?

I don't really know anything about these things, but I would assume that a certain amount of study by geneticists would be useful in providing solutions to disabilities as well as correcting faulty DNA so that future generations would not be prone to these defects.

I know lab animals are continually used in genetic research, but wouldn't we still need to have humans as well, of course this does require ethical and humane treatment.

I think that sterilization and euthanasia should only be used to help alleviate pain and suffering of those with disabilities under certain circumstances. But this needs to be done cautiously and not allowed to get out of hand.

There is absolutely no question of a future WN polity euthanizing anyone at all, and any discussion that considers it a realistic policy is terminally stupid - scientifically, medically, and above all politically.

I guess it is possible that a very few people who were genuine mental incompetents might have to be be sterilised. This happens today.

Riechsmarshall, your attitude might be heroic in an earlier era: but today it is foolish. There are almost certainly ways to ensure your children don't carry this affliction.

I don't know what it will cost, but you should investigate it rather than surrender your genetic future.

hey it's great to hear that you're such a go getter with your hearing loss.
The only opinion I have on disabilities is that most of them just sit around and do nothing...I know this one family who seemed perfectly normal when I talked to them...but they get free money for the gov't...they just sit on their fat asses all day while we have to work...
they could easily go out and get a real job but are just lazy and "disabled"
what is their disability exactly? WHO KNOWS!!!

Since I have double recessive genes for deafness, I have committed myself to never reproduce, and prevent my genes from being carried down into the gene pool by my children. ...So, what is your view on self-reliant disabled people who do not reproduce like me? It's not just deafness, but any disability that does not hamper productivity, such as cleft lips and the like.

A little background on me: I was born profoundly deaf to a hearing family.

Hello from another Stormfront deafie. I am partly deaf due to meningitis when I was 12. Like you, no other members of my family have hearing problems.

Quote:

My parents decided to enroll me in a state school for the deaf from childhood, where I learned signing, writing and speech. I remained in that school from kindergarten to midway through high school, when I finally got fed up with the sub-par education and transferred to a public high school, where I am in my junior year now.

I didn't go to a school for the deaf myself. Because my illness and subsequent hearing loss occurred when I was 12, it was decided that the upheaval of moving to a new school and trying to make the switch over to the "deaf" world would not do me any favours. So I stayed in normal school and basically tried to carry on as normally as possible, which I think was probably a good thing.

Quote:

I never could get the catch of speaking fluently, no matter how hard I tried. My speech is halting and monotonous, and it's quite tiring and painful for me to speak for any length of time.

I know what you mean. I don't have speech problems myself, my speech is normal because obviously I could already speak before I had any hearing problem. But I do have a lot of friends I've made over the years who were deaf from birth and do have great trouble with speaking, and many of them prefer to sign, like yourself.

Quote:

I despise the ADA and interpreters, and I never use interpreters. I learn at school mostly by teaching myself out of the textbook.

Pretty much what I did, too, yes. It was only when I got out of school and went to college that I really started getting any benefit from a "normal" teaching situation.

Quote:

I believe that deafness does not hamper my ability to contribute to society through physical and mental labor; rather, I view it as more of a communicative disability.

Well, of course it doesn't. Why should it? I think most people have a problem with deafness because it's an "invisible" disability. If you suffer from a physical disability, like you are in a wheelchair or something, people can deal with that a lot more easily because the disability is so obvious. With a deaf person, there's nothing to give away that they even have a disability at all. It confuses and somewhat scares people, I think.

Quote:

Many, many people have told me that if I truly believed in National Socialism, I should just kill myself. I do not do so because I believe that I can do more for the Cause alive than dead.

Well, personally... obviously I can only speak for myself. But if anyone ever said anything like that to me, they would find themselves eating hospital food for a rather long period of time. I don't take sh*t like that from anybody, and neither should you.

I've never had any problems sticking up for myself, I can tell you that. Having to cope with all the problems when I was just a kid, has made me very mentally tough. I no longer tolerate even a tiny amount of bullsh*t from anybody who has a problem with me because I don't happen to hear as well as they do.

Quote:

So, what is your view on self-reliant disabled people who do not reproduce like me? It's not just deafness, but any disability that does not hamper productivity, such as cleft lips and the like.

I'm not sure what you mean, really. What exactly are you asking people? Why should anyone have a problem with any other person who is self-reliant, as you put it?

Quote:

Obviously, sterilization does not apply to enviromental disability (deafness through fever, chainsaw accident, etc.) although the euthanization rule still applies.

Euthanasia.. I believe should be there as an option, for instance when a child is going to be born horribly deformed and will not have a decent quality of life. I don't believe, however, that there should be any kind of enforced euthanasia going on at all.

To your comment about not having children: Well, you can do what you like, but I've already fathered one beautiful, white (and hearing) girl. I am unfortunately divorced from her mother now, but when I find the right partner I intend to have more.

Anyone who's got a problem with that, can come right over here and tell me about it to my face... if they've got the guts.

...as for adapting our society to accommodate the slowest, stupidest, least competent - why have society at all? i often think that if we'd spent 1% of the money we've spent on wheelchair ramps, wide doors and potty handles on dedicated research, we'd have invented replacement legs by now. (if you don't believe me, give me 1% of the 1% and i'll do it myself, altho it would take me 2 years, during which i have much more important things to do).

What about those who become disabled as adults...ie car accident, stroke, MS, MD,? As soon as they are diagnosed, kill them? Would you be the one who decides which are worthy of life and which should immediately be offed? What would the qualifications be in those situations? If they can't walk (and require wheelchair ramps/doors etc? Or what about if they can walk but it's slow and halting? What about Parkinsons patients? Eventually they suffocate and waste away...would they be suitable for euthanasia? What about those with Cerebral Palsy...in some cases their bodies are almost useless but their minds work well.

I'm just trying to get a feel what what is acceptable. I work with these people everyday...and what you see (or what your first impression might be) can be devastatingly wrong. In some cases, they are so profoundly retarded, adults will function the way a 4 year old might. But others are much better off. Where is the line drawn? What about WN's? What if a well known, well liked, intelligent amazing leader gets in a car accident...what if he/she is now a quadraplegic or ended up with a severe head trauma....would be suddenly not be worthy of life even though he has done so much for the Movement?

I work with learning disabled adults myself. Some were born disabled; others have acquired disorders like traumatic brain injuries. I work with one client who was perfectly normal until the age of 18 when he was envolved in a car accident that changed his life for ever. Most of these guys have great personalities and try to contribute as much as they can. Its amazing all the things we take for granted.
These people are our brothers, sisters, children and parents. It is our moral duty to provide for them. If we can send a man to Mars or crash a $200 million plane in the Iraq, there is no financial reason not to.
Of course, we should have laws against profoundly retarded people reproducing. And we should use our new scientific measures to see that we detect these disorders early in the womb and abort them. I have seen people born with severe CP who spend 15 years in dire agony before dying. If we can prevent this type of pain we should. The idea of euthanizing a living person because of a disability is disgracefull and should be avoided.