Not Just 'Morally Straight'

Was the Supreme Court's June 28 decision upholding the right of
the Boy Scouts to exclude gay scoutmasters a triumph for bigotry?
Many critics are saying as much. Ruth Harlow of the Lambda Legal
Defense Fund calls it a "hollow, Pyrrhic victory." Eagle Scout
Kevin Peter of Philadelphia told the media it "creates a hostile
environment for gay men." Placards reading "Stop Teaching Hate"
have popped up at protests in Baltimore and other cities.

They may mean well, but these folks are as wrong as they are
impassioned. You don't have to be an Eagle Scout (as I happen to
be) to realize that this ruling is ultimately good for all groups,
gay ones included.

The reason is rooted, I believe, in our basic right to free
association - which necessarily includes a right not to
associate. The fact is: Private organizations of all kinds exclude
people for a variety of reasons. The Girl Scouts won't accept boys,
and the Boy Scouts won't accept girls. The NAACP will turn away
white supremacists, and big-city orchestras don't want to hire
performers who are more at ease with rock than Bach. Such standards
allow groups to project a clear message about who they are and what
they stand for, even if we disagree with them.

A corollary of this is what might be called the right to be
wrong. I can't tell the Lambda Legal Foundation (who defended James
Dale, the plaintiff in the Supreme Court case) to defend
heterosexual men and women, and Lambda shouldn't be able to tell
the Scouts to abandon their belief that homosexuality is
incompatible with being "morally straight."

This point appears lost on Evan Wolfson, Dale's chief legal
counsel, to judge from a conversation I had with him recently. Once
he learned that I supported the Court's decision, Mr. Wolfson asked
me if I was ever taught by the Boy Scouts that homosexuality was
wrong. Was there a Scout law against it? No, I told him, not
directly, but it's part of the injunction to remain "morally
straight." His reply: "Well, who's to judge what that means?"

Quite frankly, we are, and if Messrs. Dale and Wolfson
don't like that, that's their problem, not the Scouts'. In
the opinion of the Boy Scouts, homosexuality is wrong. Those who
disagree are free to whine and complain all they want - and even
form their own alternative organization - but it doesn't give them
the right to try and use the government to force a private
organization to alter its code of ethics.

It's not as if membership in the Boy Scouts is compulsory for
all males. Those who don't like the way the Scouts operate don't
have to join. The same is true with religion - you either believe
or you don't. If you believe, you are expected to abide by the
rules of your chosen faith.

George A. Davidson, chief legal counsel for the Boy Scouts, both
in New Jersey and before the U.S. Supreme Court, is someone who
understands the right to be wrong. Davidson told me that the
freedom of association, properly understood, is what caused the Boy
Scouts to win cases in California, Kansas, Connecticut and Oregon.
According to Davidson, the Supreme Court reversed New Jersey's
decision against the Scouts because Wolfson couldn't prove this
would be a "lock box case" - meaning that a victory for Dale would
set a precedent for every excluded person to sue an organization
that had denied him or her membership.

Their disagreement with the Scouts over homosexuality has led
many of its critics to neglect the importance of this right to be
wrong. They fall back instead on the acceptance of homosexuality in
modern culture, and make dire predictions for the Scouts.
"Dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't evolve," Dale said
after the ruling. "The Boy Scouts are making themselves extinct,
and it's a very sad thing." But as Chief Justice William Rehnquist
noted, this is hardly an argument for denying First Amendment
protection to those who refuse to accept homosexuality as just
another lifestyle choice.

Like other Scouts, I have no interest in forcing gay groups to
accept heterosexuals in leadership positions. Is it too much to ask
them to extend us the same courtesy?

Stuart Jones Jr., was the 2000 Kevin Kline intern at the
Heritage Foundation, (www.heritage.org),
, is a senior majoring in political science at the University of
Arkansas in Monticello.

Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."

Sign up to start your free subscription today!

Sorry! Your form had errors:

About The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.

Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More