New god: Brangelina. Can change stances, both are beautiful actors, enemies are mesmerized every time they see him/her. Angelina stance's passive donates money to the poorest teammate; Brad stance's passive does crappy movies, which enemies are stunned after watching.

I don't know about you, but to me lately his movies have not been up to par to his earlier work. Even I, someone who doesn't like romantic movies, have to admit that the Joe Black movie where he's acting as death coming to take Anthony Hopkins is far better than whatever he did lately.

12 years a slave is an excellent movie, World War Z was a great book that was turned into a movie with the wrong idea, could've been better but its not horrible. Moneyball is good, Inglorious basterds is amazing.

I guess we all have different opinions, but in the past he has been part of great movies regardless of what he has done recently (which hasn't been that bad) to forgive almost anything he has done (except mr and mrs smith, fuck that shit, but we all know Angelina was the reason on why he did that movie)

Inglourious Basterds was the only one I liked out of that list, and saw WWZ (great book awful movie). Now I can't speak about 12 YaS or Moneyball, because to be honest, that's way too much drama for me, movies like that bore me (I'm not saying they're bad since I never watched them). I'm just saying Fight Club, 12 Monkeys, Seven or even The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford beat everything he has done recently (especially Fight Club, which we won't talk about).

Exactly, you mention Fight Club, 12 Monkeys and Seven as a comparison, but in order to match something to compare to those movies he should've been doing the best movies of the last 2-3 years.

I don't think there is a single Actor that has done movies that could compare to those 3 in sequence in the last 2-3 years (DiCaprio maybe with Django, the Great Gatsby and TWoWS?)

You also have to be a little bit lucky to achieve such quality movies since you don't always tell a movie is good based on "the plot". And I don't think actors take jobs knowing how its going to be the finished product, do they?

Specially if you consider, like I do, Fight Club as your favourite movie, and I'm not saying best ever, just favourite. Stuff like that is hard to match.

earlier today i played with one "goddessoflove" somewhat predictably they choose aphro, he had 1200 kills and 8800 assists, i remembered because it was so easy to work out that he took the killing blow in 12% of kill he was involved in.

I hate people like this. Sure you can like a God a lot but you are better off playing ever God and getting a feel for every role. It makes you a better player if you can play other roles instead of being an instalocker.

These are the people with 1 god rank, and the reason i wish they showed god ranks. He gets to show off his massive amounts of kills on one god, while I can't show off the work I put into getting every god ranked up, even ones I didn't like to play.

sorry to burst your bubble but having all gods mastered doesn't equal skill. every idiot (not meaning you with that) can play 5-7 games with a god and grind some worshippers. there are only 50 needed for rank 1.

also if you look at his stats he has more than double the amount of assists than kills which isn't such a good stat for an ADC. on supports and warriors yes you will most likely have more assists than kills but on junglers and adc's you want to have more kills than assists.

No, I'm saying Arena is more fun than Conquest. Conquest is slow and dull. The enemy players aren't your enemy--they're a nuisance interrupting the grind, and you have to swat them away to get back to your grindstone so that you can take down an AI phoenix and an AI titan.

Whereas, in Arena, they may be minions every so often, but the goal is much more appropriate for a PvP game: kill the enemy players, and kill them a lot until the game is over. Much faster-paced, and much more fun.

Uh..Yeah, I play jungle, I gank and it's usually fun enough. I hear solo-lane is pretty boring, but mid and duo usually have to poke eachother out.

Conquest isn't dull nor boring, takes more skill to plan out an attack rather than..Running in and fighting..? Yeah, can't be impressed with arena players stats since kills are LITERALLY handed to you. Most people who go into arena are gunna get 5+ Kills unless they're bad/a support.

If I want a more strategic game mode, I'll play Joust or Siege, thank you. Those modes have the decency of not taking upwards of a goddamn hour to finish while being excruciatingly tedious all the while.

You strike me as the kind of player who gets doodied on in conq so you have an irrational hatred for it whereas if you actually took the time to get good at it you would find it a much more enjoyable experience

Do not abuse anyone else. Do not personally attack any other user. Positively oriented feedback and criticism is allowed, but flaming, bigotry, and generally demeaning/hateful speech is not. This includes, but is not limited to: derogatory remarks about race, cultural background, religious background, sexual orientation, gender, or otherwise demeaning speech.

This is your first offense. Your account has received a warning. Further offenses will result in posting suspension from /r/Smite.