Competitive advantage

Unlike other DNA-tagging systems that are restricted to authentication applications, our system is designed to identify an unknown set of DNA fragments from a pool of billions. This opens a wide range of novel applications including supply chain tracing, counterfeit goods identification and random access for DNA-based archival data storage. ​

The Nucleotrace system offers orders of magnitude improvements over existing DNA-tracing technologies:

Identification and authentication capabilities

Library size: 1000's billions (unlimited) vs hundreds

Mixing limit: 1000's billions (unlimited) vs 20

Decoding efficiency: one vs 300 reactions per sample

Portable: samples are decoded in the field in < one hour.

Parallel sample processing: up to 96 samples can be decoded simultaneously

DNA fragments are: non-toxic, highly secure, and invisible

​

​These claims are mathematically defensible and have been demonstrated experimentally. Further efficiency improvements are not possible using synthetic DNA as a taggant since only one recovery reaction is required to screen a sample, and information is encoded using individual nucleic acid base pairs - which are the smallest indivisible unit of DNA.​

Current DNA tagging systems are restricted to authentication applications. Nucleotrace technology has the capacity to identify any subset of DNA fragments from a pool of 1000's billions (unlimited).

Authentication

Authentication asks the question: Is this product X? Tests for a known set of fragments on an object using a particular set or sets of molecular ‘keys’.

Identification

Identification asks the question: what product is this? Tests for an unknown set of fragments by screening a library of billions of possible alternatives.​For identification applications, such as ammunition and product precursor tracing, prior knowledge of the molecular 'keys' (primers) required to recover the taggants is absent by definition. Using conventional recovery techniques to identify one bullet from a pool of millions is clearly not feasible, as this would require screening millions of sets of keys in combination.

​Why DNA?DNA is an ideal molecular taggant because it is stable, information dense, inexpensive, non-toxic, and synthesised and sequenced using commercially mature technologies. Non-biological information is encoded into fragments of DNA using the nucleic acid base pair (bp) ‘alphabet’, where the set of letters available is S = {A, C, G, T}. This base-four system allows vast amounts of information to be stored in short fragments of DNA. For example, > one trillion unique codewords may be generated from fragments of length 20 bp (420).​

Identification vs

authentication

The competition

The problem of ‘authentication versus identification’ has only been addressed in one other patent (US Patent 8,735,327). This patent discloses a system that uses​​​ a string of 'lock' sites that correspond to the value and position of a letter in a binary word.

The drawback of lock-site encoded systems is that Watson-Crick DNA binding biochemistry sets the lock length, which in turn sets the number of nucleotides required to encode each letter to 20 - 30 bp. Oligonucleotide synthesis constraints additionally restrict the taggant size to 100 bp which limits the string length of each codeword to a maximum of n = 100/20 = 5 letters. These restrictions limit the size of a binary library to only w = 25 = 32 unique codewords.

Decoding primer-pair systems also requires that samples are screened with every possible combination of forward and reverse key sequences in the coding alphabet. The resulting network graph of positive reactions is used to determine the set of taggants present in a sample. Samples become un-decodable, however, when the graph of reactions contain overlapping sub-graphs that are not representative of taggants in the sample . For example, a binary system of s = 2 with word length n = 5 has a library size of 32 taggants, requires 40 screening reactions to decode, and has a maximum taggant mixing limit of 6 taggants. The addition of a seventh taggant would render the entire sample un-decodable.

Although the mixing limit of primer-site encoded technology may be increased through the use multiple libraries or ternary or quaternary encoding systems, both of these approaches dramatically increase the number of screening reactions, and therefore samples, required.

As such, all existing taggant technologies remain well out of reach for identification applications that require a mixing limit in the thousands or more.