"Then answered Amos, and said to Amaziah: 'I was no prophet, neither was I a prophet's son; but I was a herdman, and a dresser of sycamore-trees;"

that is, Amos the boles of sycamores, with the observation that in Geez, a balas is a fig, so the pasuk probably means figger of sycamores (as Dr. Steiner had pointed out in his class on Amos).

The page also had a post titled "Did a dialectal difference between Babylonian and Galilean Aramaic lead to a mistaken psak?" which discussed Yechezkel Kutscher's suggestion that because the Babylonian Aramaic did not distinguish between absolute and definite forms of Aramaic nouns and Galilean Aramaic did, the Yerushalmi treated a statement from Bavel as the feminine absolute rather than Babylonian masculine absolute. In discussing this, I cite a yerushalmi that uses the words psilos (though the printed addition, not recognizing the Greek word, transformed the last letter from a samech to a mem sofit). A psilos is someone with a speech impediment, such that, for example, in trying to say nazir, he will say instead nazik.

Indeed. the reason I posted these two posts in such close proximity is that I had in mind what the searcher was searching for - a midrash that Amos was a psilos, and the Rashi who on that basis explains the hapax legomenon (a word occuring only once in Tanach) boles.

The midrash is in Vayikra Rabba 10:2. The context is the Jews rejecting every prophet Hashem sends. I will translate the portion in red:

And a boles of sycamores:
Searching in the sycamores, to see which one's time it is to be cut in order to increase leaves
And which is appropriate for boards
For it is usual that they cut betulot shikma (young sycamores)
And boles is like (=) bolesh.
But because Amos had a speech impediment
For so they say {this is Rabbi Pinchas} why was his name called Amos? Because he was burdened (amus) in his tongue
the Jews called him psilos, as see in the Pesikta.

I doubt that the word boles was what influenced R Pinchas to make his statement, but Rashi makes good use of it.

Of course, Amos does not turn every shin into a samech, or else he would have said he was a boles sikmim, rather than shikmim. Perhaps it is an occasional slip.

One could also claim (except that we have the better etymology of balas = fig) that it is the phonological context that prompts this change. That is, the close proximity of thin shin in the next word, shikmim, sycamores, is what led to a weakening in the shin into a samech at the end of the previous word, bolesh. That is, the following phonological rule is applied:

/sh/ --> [s] / ___ # sh

which means that /sh/ becomes [s] in the context of being followed by a word boundary (#) and then a shin. Try saying bolesh shikmim a few times fast, with little pause between words, and see how the shin is weakened. Add a speech impediment to the mix, and it is even easier.

Why would R Pinchas give this explanation for Amos's name?

One possibility is how Amos handles the name Yitzchak in the same perek, 7.

16 Now therefore hear thou the word of the LORD: Thou sayest: Prophesy not against Israel, and preach not against the house of Isaac;

The second one is Amos' reiteration of Amatziah's command.

It is somewhat irregular to write Yischak instead of Yitzchak. and this might represent a difficulty in pronouncing the emphatic tzadi, falling instead into the non-emphatic sin. We do have one occurrence in Yirmiyahu 33:26:

26 then will I also cast away the seed of Jacob, and of David My servant, so that I will not take of his seed to be rulers over the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; for I will cause their captivity to return, and will have compassion on them.' {P}

However, that is the only other time, so one might rely on the multiple instances in Amos, especially if there is other supporting data, such as his name.

Also, it is something of a tradition for prophets to have speech impediments (Moshe), or impure lips which need fixing (Yeshayahu), or are to young to speak well (Yirmiyahu), or are silent until commanded to speak (Yechezkel) . So it is not strange to have another prophet with difficulty speaking.

I would suggest that perhaps one might also read Amos' statement in Amos 3:7-8 as a defense against what R Pinchas says people were complaining.

8 The lion hath roared, who will not fear? The Lord GOD hath spoken, who can but prophesy?

That is, if Hashem speaks, how can I but prophesy, even though I have difficulty doing so. True, this does not answer why Hashem would choose someone with a speech impediment in the first place, but perhaps R Pinchas was looking at this pasuk when he said his statement.

Overheard: What do you call that again?
-
Older fellow with glasses: I see that book in your taliis bag, called "Forgiveness". What is it about? New Age Guy: It is about how you have to forgive all t...

Recent Posts

YESHIVA WORLD NEWS

Followers

about

parshablog is published by (rabbi) josh waxman (joshwaxman [at] yahoo [dot] com), a grad student in Revel, a grad student in a Phd program in computer science at CUNY. i recently received semicha from RIETS. this blog is devoted to parsha as well as whatever it is i am currently learning.