8th ave wrote:We have a hall-of-famer on our hands. We make ONE big move to get another superstar caliber player and we're in contention. Yeah I said it.

I have thought since getting Bogut that we have the players to be a contender, but nothing like having a superstar, another one, as Curry looks superstar right now. What a steal this season he has been.

Don't see any superstar attainable right now, but maybe a stral of a trade for Paul Pierce, who is gettable after this season, can happen. A steal like Rush and Jack or Landry for PP. Pierce is old now and likely will only be around another three years, but it gives a star player that can push the team to real contender. Who knows, but I'd rather keep the team as is and evaluate it all after next season, besides trading either or both AB and RJ this offseason.

Safe to assume that when Curry scores 40+ , we lose? 44pts and 11asts vs the Spurs ... beast stat line...but a loss. And yeah keep feeding the beast when the 'human torch' is on fire. And do realize Curry's gotta shoulder more of the load with D. Lee out. But can't help thinking this team is better when we have multiple players involved / more team ball. I mean Carl Landry only played 14min and took only 5 shots in the entire game (making 4). Thoughts?

I think that's fair because I am a homer, but also because they score roughly the same on their possessions, but he has a much higher assist rate. How much of that high assist rate is due to Popovich and would it translate to other teams?