Now comes the Affiant, a Woman, living on the land known as Arizona,
in the country known as the United States of America, one of “We,
the People”, known in the region as Lorene Ann Haggard, who has, by
Claim of Right established her identity as Lorene Ann Haggard, an
Express Trust at Common Law to achieve Justice regarding the fraud in
national and international banking and to set straight treason
against “We, the People”, sovereigns over the land, in a class
action lawsuit in this forum established for the purpose, known as
the Court of Record of Lorene Ann Haggard, 'this court' or
'this Court of Record'.

Affiant is
competent to state the matters set forth herein with first hand
knowledge all contents herein are true, correct, and complete in
accordance with Affiant's knowledge, consciousness, standing and
intent. Affiant is of sound mind and over the age of twenty-one.

This Court, being a Court of Record where the tribunal is independent
of the Magistrate designated to run the court, which must reason upon
What-Is with no presumptions other than “innocent until proven
guilty”, must by necessity come to the same conclusions as Court
of Record acting in the name of the Queen of England.

This Court, being a Court of Record, takes Judicial cognizance of the
FACT that the United States of America is a corporation, thus its
charter must have been granted by a sovereign, and that this
sovereign must be one of either “We, the People” or the Queen of
England.

This Court, as a Court of Record, already declared to be a court of
Common Law, chooses to adopt the Magna Carta as its law, which has
been long acknowledged as declaratory of the Common Law and a model
to establish the Jury, the Barons of the Magna Carta, each member of
which is to be duly qualified as peers capable of comprehending the
crime and passing judgment over the counter-defendants.

This Court, as the Court of the Sovereign over the United States of
America, the power that granted the Charter of the United States of
America and thus the counter-defendants, claims jurisdiction over the
counter-defendants and has captured the counter-defendants to
be subject to a fair and impartial trial before a competent tribunal,
a jury of men and women duly qualified as described above.

It has been established by Blackstone that the duty of all who shall
govern is the liberty of their subjects. The unity of government of
the English speaking people vests in the Queen of England, that is to
say, in a Court of Record acting in the name of the Sovereign over
the soil - other words for the Supremacy of the Rule of Law – the
same in England as it is in America.

In ancient England, this Court would be none other than Her Majesty
the Queen of England in session in the House of Lords, seated before
the Lords, each a mini-King in his own right, sovereign over his
land, each capable of all the facilities of a sovereign, with power
to investigate, to field an army, to compel the State to execute the
Will of this court, issued under Seal.

Today, the United Kingdom, like the United States of America, is a
corporate body, subject to the same limitations and woes and has had
to defend itself from the onslaught of bank fraud from criminal
actors within the banks of America.

“We, the People” have never
yielded our Sovereignty to the United States of America,
a fact that is well established in the Administrative Court System
created by the 11th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, which
states by “The Judicial power of the United States shall
not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity ”.
This clearly removes the power of the United States to act with the
Color of Law. The men and women employed by this inferior
administrative court known as the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA thus have no power to deny
any motion of this Court of Record and their acts and actions are
void and null.

It is the constitutional duty of this woman of America to
ensure that the United States of America and the land known as
America does not descend into tyranny or needless war and to ensure
the present and future liberty of her fellow men and women and
children of America.

The unity of decision of a Court of Record with all other Courts of
Record being paramount regarding this case of bank fraud, in regard
to a class action lawsuit, this Court of Record must take Judicial
cognizance of the fact of the unity of mankind and that the
injured parties as a result of the bank fraud in America include all
the men and women of the
land in all the corporate nation states of the United Nations.

This Court of Record takes Judicial Cognizance of the fact, that the
Crown of England is the Trustee of the United Nations, and thus this
Court of Record brings a class action law suit on behalf of the men
and women of the land in
all the countries of the United Nations in the name of Her Majesty
The Queen of England.

This court, as the Court of Record in a class action lawsuit by “We,
the People”, places on record its objection to the fraud by the
counter-defendants and the treason of the so-called “representatives
of the people” who have failed to object to the loss of ability of
their Sovereigns to pay their debts at law.

“We, The people” of America have placed such an objection on
record in the Minnesota Credit River decision of 1968.
All acts by the United States including the announcement by then
President Richard Nixon to 'leave the gold standard', are void of
law.

This court, as the Court of Record in a class action lawsuit by “We,
the People”, places on record its objection to UCC § 3-202.
NEGOTIATION SUBJECT TO RESCISSION and § 3-402. SIGNATURE BY
REPRESENTATIVE, which taken together are an attempt to legalize
fraud-in-fact and constitute treason to the sovereigns of the soil,
men and women of America, “We, the People”, by their so-called
representatives acting ultra vires, that is, beyond their
power to defraud and thus enslave “We, the People”, of America.

This Court of Record, not subject to the jurisdiction of the
administrative courts of the United States, places on record that it
will seek an international venue to examine the issues brought
forward by this class action lawsuit against the captured United
States of America, and seek a joinder from other injured parties,
including but not limited tothe Queen of England.

The fact of fraudulent conversion by the bank regarding the
promissory note that it took onto its books, the fact of the criminal
failure to show cause, produce evidence including evidence of
contract and books of account by the counter-defendants is captured
in the following public record of this court and are deemed included
in full at this point in this Affidavit of Truth:

2010-02-19
Affiant filed NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY filed into
PIMA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE.

2010-05-27
Claim of Right, Notice of Claims, and Notice of Felonies of Lorene
Ann Haggard, filed on the Public Record # 13818/430 at the PIMA
COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE with supporting documentation and mailed
certified to:

Blythe Edmondson – 7009 2820 0000 8358 1601

Oro Valley Police Department – 7009 2820 0000 8358 1595

Ted B. Borek – 7009 2820 0000 8358 1557

Pima County Sheriff's Office – 7009 2820 0000 8358 1618

Rande D. Johnsen – 7009 2820 0000 8358 1588

All
documents in Case # C20102994 in the PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

All
documents in Case # C20109163 in the PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Attachments
included with this document obtained from Arizona Secretary of State
on 2011-04-18:

Loyalty
Oath of Office for Lori B. Jones

Notice
of Appointment and Loyalty Oath of Office for Richard E. Gordon

These
claims are supported by:

Revocation
of the counter-defendant's Writ of Restitution by the first
administrative judge, TED B. BOREK. Dismissal of the Case #
C20102994 by the Administrative Judge, TED B. BOREK for failure of
the counter-defendant, WELLS FARGO BANK, to prosecute the case;

Finality
of Settlements Part I and Part II published by the Global Settlement
Foundation4.

Administrative court officials are placed on notice that any attempt
to file “denied” without showing cause and without a wet ink
signature of the Judge and seal of the administrative court shall
constitute resignation of the named official from his duties and
fraud-in-fact in this court and willing forfeiture of any pay.

There is
“no request for relief” in this document, and this document
cannot be denied without point-by-point refutation by the
counter-defendants in front of a duly qualified tribunal of this
court, where such a tribunal is modeled on the Barons of the Magna
Carta.

Please
take notice that this document constitutes a class action lawsuit
against the United States of America and the counter-defendants and
removal of the case from the inferior administrative court system
without recourse.

Henceforth
this court shall style Lorene Ann Haggard as the Plaintiff and the
counter-defendants as simply “defendants”. This court shall
appoint magistrates duly qualified in the common law, and declare the
venue in cooperation with other plaintiffs in this class action
lawsuit such as Her Majesty the Queen of England and other injured
sovereigns as Plaintiff.

Affiant
takes judicial note of the de-facto civil war in America waged by
factions of the corporate United States resulting in Acts of War that
are both visible and invisible. This court thus places the reader on
notice that there is no statute of limitation for fraud and
treason.

This court adjourns until such time as the Plaintiffs come to an
agreement regarding a venue to pursue the defendants.

Affiant
confirms that all of the above are “Yea, yea; Nay, nay for
whatsoever is more than these cometh
of evil.”
as stated in Matthew 5-33:37 of the King James Bible, to the best
knowledge and consciousness
of the Affiant.

All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

including the
right to amend without leave of court.

Seal

Witness Date

Witness Date

Witness Date

AFFIDAVIT OF
PROOF OF SERVICE

I,
Lorene Ann Haggard the
Counter-Plaintiff comes with this, AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH filed into the
Public Records and THE
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT5,being
placed before the Clerk of Court of the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA on this 6th
day of September in the year of our Lord 2011 AD ; and,

I,
Lorene Ann Haggard, did deliver by required method through the court
administrator on the nineth floor of the PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
authorized originals of the above AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH to:

Judge
Richard E. Gordon

Hearing Officer Lori B. Jones,

Judicial Administrative Assistant Mary Dimond,

I,
Lorene Ann Haggard, being over the age of twenty-one years,
competent to witness and with firsthand knowledge do say that on the
6rd
day of September, 2011, I did cause to be mailed via US Postal
Service, by Certified Mail, postage prepaid, the above AFFIDAVIT OF
TRUTH to:

_______________________________________________________________________________
All
Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

5
Please take notice: United States courts are operating under the
(1) “Trading With The Enemy Act” and, (2) Title 28 usc, Chapter
176 “Federal Debt Collection Procedure,” making the courts
“foreign states” to the people by congressional mandate. This
administrative court of the United States is operating in violation
of administrative procedure and judicial procedure.