Ver. 15, 16. Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is the new creation. Peace and mercy to all who follow this rule, to the Israel of God

Do you see the power of the Cross, to what a height it’s raised him? Not only has it put to death all mundane affairs as far as he’s concerned, but has set him far above the old dispensation. What is equal to this power? The Cross has persuaded him [Paul], who was prepared to slay and be slain over the issue of circumcision, to simply equate it with uncircumcision, and to seek things strange and marvellous and above the heavens. He calls this way of life a new creation, both on account of what’s past, and of what’s to come. Of what’s past, because our soul, which had grown old with the hoariness of sin, has all at once been renewed by baptism, as if it had been created anew. This is why we require a new and heavenly way of life. And of things to come, because heaven, earth and the whole of creation, will be transformed into incorruption, as will our own body. ‘Don’t talk to me’, he says, ‘about circumcision, which now serves no purpose- how can it when everything’s undergone such a change- but seek the new things of grace’. Those who pursue these things will enjoy peace and goodwill, and may properly be called by the name of Israel. Those who hold contrary sentiments, though they be descended from him [Israel] and bear his title, have, however, fallen away from both the relationship and the name itself. But it’s still in their power to be true Israelites, provided they keep this [new] rule, desist from the old ways, and pursue grace.

Ver. 17. From now on, let no-one bring me burdens

He says this not because he’s weary or overwhelmed. How could he relax and recline when he chose to do and suffer everything for his disciples’ sake? It was he who said, ‘Be prepared at all times (2 Timothy 4:2); and, ‘… in case God grants them repentance, brings them to a knowledge of the truth, and frees them from the trap of the devil’ (2 Timothy 2:25-26) Then why does he say this? It’s to sharpen their slothful mind, and to impress upon them a deeper fear, and to bolster the laws he himself had put in place, and to stabilize their constant vacillation.

Ver. 17. For I bear the marks of Jesus on my body

He doesn’t say, ‘I have’, but, ‘I bear’, like someone taking pride in trophies and royal insignia. He still thinks his wounds are actually shameful*, yet boasts of and rejoices in them as if they were military standards**. And why does he say this? Because they speak louder than any words or any voice. ‘They make a noise louder than any trumpet against my opponents, and against those who say that I’m a hypocrite in my teaching and that I speak to please others. Nobody who sees a soldier retiring from the battle soaked in blood and sorely wounded, would dare to accuse him of cowardice and treachery, given that he bears on his body the evidence of his bravery. So ought you to judge me. And if you want to hear my defence, and to learn what I think, consider my wounds, which offer a stronger proof than these words and letters’. At the outset of his Epistle he indicated his sincerity by the suddenness of his conversion; at its close [he proves it] by the perils which attended it [his conversion]. In case anyone says that he might have converted with the best of intentions, but that he hadn’t persisted, he produces his trials, his dangers and his wounds as evidence of his tenacity.

Then having defended himself clearly in every particular, and proved that he hadn’t spoken from anger or malice and that his affection towards them was unimpaired, he expresses it in a prayer with a thousand blessings, in these words:

In these last words he confirms everything that preceded them. Elsewhere he says ‘with you’ but here he says ‘with your spirit’, drawing them away from carnal things, demonstrating God’s beneficence, and reminding them of the grace which they enjoyed, whereby he was able to recall them from all their Judaizing errors. That they received the Spirit was not the result of the poverty of the Law, but of the righteousness which is by Faith. And the fact that they preserved it, once obtained, wasn’t due to circumcision but to Grace. This is why he concluded his exhortation with a prayer, reminding them of Grace and the Spirit. At the same time he addressed them as ‘brethren’, and prayed to God that they might continue to enjoy these blessings, thus providing them with a twofold protection. Both prayer and teaching, were working to the same end and together became a double wall. Teaching, reminded them of what benefits they enjoyed and kept them within the doctrine of the Church; while prayer, invoking grace and convincing them to remain constant, prevented the Spirit from leaving them. Because the Spirit dwelt in them, the deception of the [erroneous] doctrines was shaken off like dust, in Jesus Christ Our Lord, to Whom be the power and the glory, together with the Father and the Holy Spirit, now and for ever and unto the ages of ages. Amen

* The word stigmata meant ‘perforations’ or ‘piercings’ and refers to the holes caused by crucifixion, which was the most shameful form of the death penalty.
** Assuming that the scribe who wrote down Saint John’s homily didn’t simply mishear, there is a very nice distinction here. Saint John mentions ‘insignia’ (simeia) and then simeioforos which would mean ‘insignia-bearer’. The normal word would be simaioforos, a ‘standard-bearer’. The ‘standard’ would have borne the ‘insignia’ of the person concerned, so I feel that the slightly loose translation is permissible. WJL.

OCN has partnered with Pemptousia. A Contemporary post-modern man does not understand what man is.Through its presence in the internet world, Pemptousia, with its spirit of respect for beauty that characterizes it, wishes to contribute to the presentation of a better meaning of life for man, to the search for the ontological dimension of man, and to the awareness of the unfathomable mystery of man who is always in Christ in the process of becoming, of man who is in the image of divine beauty. And the beauty of man springs from the beauty of the Triune God. In the end, “beauty will save the world”.

Pemptousia and OCN have entered a strategic partnership to bring Orthodoxy Worldwide. Greek philosophers from Ionia considered held that there were four elements or essences (ousies) in nature: earth, water, fire and air. Aristotle added ether to this foursome, which would make it the fifth (pempto) essence, pemptousia, or quintessence. The incarnation of God the Word found fertile ground in man’s proclivity to beauty, to goodness, to truth and to the eternal. Orthodoxy has not functioned as some religion or sect. It was not the movement of the human spirit towards God but the revelation of the true God, Jesus Christ, to man. A basic precept of Orthodoxy is that of the person ­– the personhood of God and of man. Orthodoxy is not a religious philosophy or way of thinking but revelation and life standing on the foundations of divine experience; it is the transcendence of the created and the intimacy of the Uncreated. Orthodox theology is drawn to genuine beauty; it is the theology of the One “fairer than the sons of men”. So in "Pemptousia", we just want to declare this "fifth essence", the divine beaut in our life. Please note, not all Pemptousia articles have bylines. If the author is known, he or she is listed in the article above.

The Orthodox Christian Network is a commissioned agency of the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops of North and Central America. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Orthodox Christian Network.

The Orthodox Christian Network is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and all donations are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.