I agree fer_realz.
I also like the portraits of Breann.....and judging by her facial expressions, she seems to be a very sweet lady too.
IMO, the greatest physical attribute of any woman is a beautiful smile:)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nice debut set Catherine, I hope Breann is with Met Art for quite some time.

Two new models in a matter of weeks (Xola and Breann), do you have any other new models waiting to make their debut soon Catherine?

Nice set Catherine.
I haven't heard from Nastya in a while, but I suspect she will like this set very much. The colouring and lighting work very well with Nastya's skin tone.
My favourite set of the day.

I agree with hipshot....nothing at all to be embarrassed by.
I think as long as we realize that we will never meet any of these women we're doing alright. There's nothing wrong with admiring a woman's beauty.

The scary ones are those who believe they are in love with one of these women and somehow get it in their heads that they'll track her down and meet her in person (as if she's just waiting to be swept off her feet by them).

fer_realz,
I too envy the photographers who see beautiful women such as Lukki on a daily basis for they are true martyrs....think of the pain and suffering they must endure to bring "us" these women:)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A career with fringe benefits???.....then again who knows???
Many photographers who seem to be men are actually women....and vice versa....
and it's also possible a few male photographers aren't "into" women at all (if you know what I mean).

I dated a girl years ago who hated her freckles and wanted so badly to do away with them and/or cover them up no matter how hard I tried to convince her "they" made her look even more beautiful.
I wish more women would realize that many men find freckles very attractive.....and to prove my point Lukki Lima is a fine example!

Lukki Lima looks fantastic in image #17 (among others). I love your expression in this image.
I think Lukki has a gorgeous face and her freckles only enhance her beauty.

Great work Karl Simi!
My thanks go out to both you and Lukki Lima.....
Thank you very much for starting out my Monday with this nice set of photos.

There are more of them than you probably realize. Of course the vast majority will not be in English (or even have English subtitles), but there are many films on the Golden Horde/Mongols which often include Volga Bulgars/Kipchak Khanate.

Xola's appearance is much like that of Tatar Princesses I've seen in films on the Golden Horde and Volga Bulgars.
The people and culture of this area of Russia/Eurasia is unknown to many Westerners, but it has a complex, rich, and proud history.
My research on this part of our world has taught me to not only appreciate their glorious past, but also admire the diverse culture of present day Tatarstan with it's blend of Islam and Orthodox Christianity living together in a peaceful society.
Aesthetically the architecture of Kazan and Tatarstan is phenomenal, but most beautiful of all is it's women:)

Luiza, if I met you in person I would simply say....
Words cannot adequately describe how beautiful I believe you are.
Your pretty brown eyes and gorgeous face are unsurpassed.
In my opinion, without doubt, you are one of the most beautiful women on earth. You are special. Spasibo.

Magwich,
I'm a big fan of Erica and Matiss....and I personally like outdoor sets, especially those with a lot of color (Erica's previous set is a rather good example of this as are several of Violla's).What concerns me is that many people have said how much they dislike outdoor sets and I worry this will eventually have an effect of whether we see more from her.....and I would like to see Erica stick around here for a long, long, time.

As I stated in my original post, I think she is a gorgeous woman....top fashion model type (if she chooses to do so).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

P.S., my only complaint is that I would like to see her in a photo set where she doesn't have to squint.

I think Erica is a gorgeous woman, but I hope this is the last of this series Matiss shot of Erica that day at the beach.
It's my guess that if Matiss doesn't have more work of Erica at another location (or better yet indoors), her ratings will begin to plummet.

I think Erica has fashion model beauty. She is tall enough and a physically beautiful woman in every way.
IMO, if she hasn't done any fashion modeling to date, it can only be that she hasn't been "discovered" yet.

I still like this set quite a bit....but not as much as her previous sets.
It seems to me that all of her work so far has been shot during the same photo session (and all Mattiss did was move her around the same general area and take photos of her with a different background).

I think she looks great AS IS!!!!
Thankfully she didn't "enhance" her breasts.
Way too many women believe that all men are attracted to large breasts.....this simply is wrong. Many of us prefer women with smaller breasts and smaller frames.
I'm glad that Lorena found out soon enough that her natural breasts her are very nice and they add to her overall beauty.

Thanks "K", I appreciate what you do. I like seeing a variety of photographers and their models as much as possible.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nice photography Catherine:)
Like others have already stated, it would be nice if Alana would show a smile now and then.
She is a pretty woman, but what she describes as "cold beauty" is not very flattering.
IMO, even if she doesn't like to smile, she could still show pleasant emotion through her eyes.
I hope Alana reads all of these comments, maybe then she would listen to you Catherine:)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As always, I want to thank you Catherine:)....and send my thanks to your team as well:))

I was a member on another site that featured many of the same models that Matiss does, but the photographer went by the name of Marsel. It's my guess that Marsel and Matiss are one in the same person.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I also question whether Dolce is the same person too.

I hope Gabriel does not retire, she is one of my top models. Catherine, the next time you speak with Gabriel please tell her that she is an amazing beauty.....you must find a way to convince her of this!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Some people admire many women, but do not necessarily have a favorite.
A few of us admire only one or two women, but we admire these one or two women very, very, very, very much!!!

So, the current rating system tells which models are most popular, but it does not tell how deeply any certain member admires a particular model.

Thank you "K" for publishing another set of Catherine's work this week. I (and many others) appreciate all that you do and realize it is impossible to satisfy everyone.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nice work Catherine:)
I generally prefer to see models in "solo" sets, but Susana and Nastya work well together (just as Vanda and Gabriel do).
I hope we are fortunate enough to see sets of both Susana/Nastya and Vanda/Gabriel many more times in the future.

Many thanks Catherine:) You deserve all the praise you receive on this set.
Please pass along my thanks to the rest of your team and let them know I appreciate all their hard work.

Thanks Kilroy.
I have emailed "K" a few times in the past and I agree that her job is not an easy one since it is impossible to satisfy everyone.

My biggest complaint is that Catherine, Deltagamma, and a few other photographers (who are also quite popular) all must "fight it out" so to speak, for the few openings that remain after a couple photographers get there 20 or more sets published each month.

This makes it hard not only for the established Met Art photographers, but it makes it almost impossible for a new photographer to get his/her work published.

I emailed one photographer about a month ago concerning a new Met Art model who had 2 very popular sets published last year. I asked him if he had any more sets of this model and he told me that Met Art rejected all the new work he sent them of this model (so he sold them to someone else).
I have seen the sets Met Art rejected and they are every bit as nice (if not better than) the 2 sets that were highly rated last year (this model still is on Met Art's top model page).

Anyone who has read my comments is aware that I never complain and I am never critical of any model or photographer....it's just that I believe Met Art blatantly favors certain photographers, while many others seldom get their work/models published.

This is not an exact figure....but Met Art publishes 120+ sets each month and if 2 photographers have 40-50 of these sets each month, it doesn't leave a whole lot of room for all the other photographers to get their work/models published.

Thank you Kilroy!!!
I was sure I wasn't alone (you, fer_realz, and others have confirmed this) in believing that Met Art does not publish enough of Catherine's work.

Catherine supposedly has photo sets of new models....6 of her models are in Met Art's list of top rated models.....with a track record like that, why hasn't Met Art allowed "us" to see these new ones???

I assume (could be wrong of course) that rachsback feels Jeff may have offers to join a club that includes Caprice A, Katherine A, and a few other girls.....at least that what I make of his "It is what it is" comment.

After going through this set again I can see your point.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I wonder if Astrud is simply tired??? It's possible this was the last photo shoot she posed for the day this was shot and she was physically exhausted???

I bring this up because her smile seems to "say" one thing and her eyes another, in many of these photos.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We'll never know....we don't know how old this set is (it could have been shot well before many of her previous sets).

Since she's always smiling and having fun in her other sets, I will give her the benefit of doubt.

I don't consider these "things" a flaw....I prefer to say it is what makes each girl unique.
Have you ever seen a photo of a symmetrical face (one displaying a mirror image of both sides)?....the person looks very odd....robot like, not human.

I personally find a "lazy" eyelid, quirky smile, etc. to often be the "feature" that makes a person really attractive.

I recently met a young woman who is attractive (but not overly beautiful/gorgeous) who I found to be extremely adorable....simply by the way she rolled her eyes and used facial expressions to show humor.....and I must admit, it made her the prettiest woman in the room. I kept returning to talk to her just to see her adorable mannerisms again and again.

About half of the first 40 or so photos didn't either make it to the editor, or were only partially edited (moles/tattoos/etc).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Other than that, overall a typical Cathleen set....but not as good as her first set.
She has a pretty face, a cute smile, and nice body.

I wasn't questioning whether a woman can grow prettier with age (I too have known a few who, IMO, have done just that).....I was questioning whether Nikia could get any prettier than she already was/is.

I must agree. I was pleasantly surprised by this set, Camilla looks exceptionally nice.
I also like how the dark background makes Camilla the focal point of each shot. It's a style that harkens back to the days when Met Art was M-E-T.

Fantastic set Rylsky!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Evita Lima with her large breasts is not necessarily my "type", but she has a beautiful face (IMO, one of the prettiest on Met Art) and looks fabulous here.

I agree rachsback. I kind of hoped Magwich would chime in and explain his comment, but I do believe you are correct.

I think my response caused problems for Catherine too, I imagine the translation from English to Russian didn't work out very well.
I probably only served to make Catherine believe that Magwich's comment was a negative one....when he probably was, in sort of a backhanded way, praising Nastya.

I just now noticed them!
Carpal tunnel causing problems with my left "pinky" finger not being able to reach the "a" key....at least that's my excuse:))
It actually sounds pretty good though....maybe better than the correct spelling of Nastya!

Correct me if I am wrong Catherine, but....
I am pretty sure that Catherine is working on another photo shoot this week, so I would imagine this is why we haven't heard from her as of yet.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I hope you are able to find a little time to join us Catherine, I always enjoy reading your responses:)

Very nice Catherine and Nastya:)
Nastya looks great and the photography is excellent.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Starting with this set, I'd like to see Nastya's overall rating begin to climb back up into the top 30 (where she had been, until just recently, for a very long time).

I suspect we have another outdoor set of Erica because all 4 of her sets were shot by Matiss on the same day in nearby locations (in he first set the sea can be seen in the background).
It's my guess the area is also close to where many of Violla's sets were shot too.

IMO, Erica is one of the best models introduced by Met Art in 2013.
I actually like outdoor sets quite a bit (especially ones with a lot of color), but it would be nice to eventually see an indoor sets of Erica (where the sun isn't in her eyes requiring her to squint all the time).

Nice set Matiss!....but it would take a real screw up to make Erica look bad:)

I guess I should have prefaced my comment with "IMO" :))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is one reason I enjoy reading the comments daily (even if I don't join in)....it reminds me of how accurate the adage "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" actually is.

It should read...."I have seen perfection, and HER name is Luiza".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Luiza is a GORGEOUS woman, she has one of the most beautiful faces in the entire world. She is adorable.

5seadog, maybe you already know this, but if not, Lukki Lima has worked with other photographers (just not Catherine or Rylsky).
This is Arkisi's first set with Lukki Lima here on Met Art, her first 3 sets were with Albert Varin.
IMO, this is her best set to date (here on Met Art).

fer_realz, I do too....who would want to be around someone that agreed with them all the time? That would lead to some very boring conversations.

I actually like a girl with a little "fire"....I like a girl who stands up for herself, but she must have a good sense of humor:)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Another thing that's very important to me....I like a women who is good with children.
I understand that not all women want to have kids, but to me the best quality any women can have is to be a caring mother.

When you think about this set being shot under the conditions you described it is quite amazing that it all came together so well (I believe this was only possible because of Catherine's warm and welcoming personality along with her photographic skills).

I'm sure Catherine really appreciates the fact that you've helped explain the difficulty that she (and all photographers....including you) face in their line of work.

Special Ed, I agree with you. I always welcome a few facial portraits.
I understand having a nice body is important for a woman's overall appearance....but IMO it starts with her face.
I gorgeous face, pretty smile, cute expression, etc. goes along way into making an attractive women a really special beautiful woman.

I absolutely love to see a woman with pleasant facial expressions.....whether it's a smile, a little "smirk", or the way her eyes display a soft welcoming look.

Hi Catherine:), I'm quite sure that Susana is a very nice lady. I know you would never work with anyone who was rude and difficult to be around.
Please make sure Susana understands I think she is a beautiful woman.
I know I am the one with the problem....there is nothing bad about Susana.

Neil, I know the problem is ME! It is spooky though how close (nearly identical) Susana's physical appearance is to the woman I dated.
I had a couple guys a went to school with who thought my girlfriend was hot....and I began to beg them to ask her out.

What complicated the issue was I really liked the girl's mother and married older sister (not sexually).
Her mother and sister were as sweet and kind as can be. The girl I dated was like her father (who happened to treat his wife like shit).
I will say though....she has a remarkable talent, she could strip completely out of her clothes within a few steps....and she didn't like to wear clothes when we were in private:)

Ok, the last set of the day. A day that has 4 models (Susana C./Catherine, Lukki Lima/Arkisi, Alysha A./Rylsky, and Marica A./Leonardo). Each of these photographers is among my favorites.

Marica is a beautiful woman. I'd find it extremely difficult not to turn and look at her if she walked by....she is HOT!!!
One more "10" for the day!....that being said, I will add, I prefer women with smaller, perky, breasts.
IMO, today is a good day to be a Met Art member.

This is only the second time I have given (4) "10's" on any given day.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Catherine, each time a new photo set of Susana is published I face a conundrum.
Your photography is excellent and Susana is beautiful....but I just can't enjoy looking at photos of her.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As I've explained before, I had a girlfriend who could pass as a physical double (or identical twin) of Susana. This woman was the meanest, nastiest, most self centered person I have ever met. I could not get away from her fast enough. Being with her was a living hell.

After stating this, it is not fair to take this out on either you or Susana.....so although I don't care to look at Susana, this set still deserves a "10".

Please give my thanks to your team for all their hard work and I especially want to thank you for all that you do. Take care my friend:)

I like everything I seen of Lukki Lima to date and IMO this is her best set yet.
I think she has a beautiful face, gorgeous brown eyes, a pretty smile, cute freckles, and a nice slender body. Oh, and I like her long brown hair too:)

Today is sort of a day of Met Art "Heavy Weights".....with Catherine, Arkisi, Rylsky, and Leonardo all presenting models in Met Art's top 150.

Of the 4, this set is my favorite.
Great work Arkisi (I've been stating this a lot lately!)

This is an excellent set of the very beautiful Lukki Lima....my second "10" of the day, but in this case I'll call it a "10+"!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On a different topic;
I don't necessarily look for this specifically, but I seem to find thinner, smaller framed, 5'-3" to 5'-7" (160mm-170mm), women the most attractive (both here and in "real" life).
Whenever I encounter a model on Met Art that I consider one of their best....I check her "stats" and inevitably she falls into the range I described. A couple exceptions being Alysha A and Erica B (both 5'-9"/175mm)

Even though I prefer thinner more petite women, Isabella is most definitely a beautiful woman.

I can completely understand why anyone would find Isabella breathtaking, incredible, adorable, gorgeous, etc. (insert the adjective you prefer)
Isabella has several attributes/assets that many men find most attractive.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Once again Arkisi has shown why I believe he is one of Met Art's top photographers.
This is an excellent photo set of the very beautiful Isabella.
Great work Arkisi.

You surely understand that unattractive to one can be gorgeous to another.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We all have our own opinion of who (or what) the perfect woman is, but I try to show respect to all the models because I realize comments can be hurtful.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My opinion is just that....MY OPINION....and even though Balina not a favorite of mine, she is a favorite of many other members.

I love this set....great work once again Arkisi!!! Nichole looks fabulous!
She's cute, humorous, sweet, beautiful, and gorgeous all in this set.
Nichole is definitely a top 10 model IMO....absolutely incredible!!!

I think Elise has the potential to be a top model on Met Art (considering she hasn't has a set published for a few years now and she's still highly rated).

Elise is a gorgeous woman. She has a beautiful face and incredible body. I'd love to see more of her....it would be nice if Met Art could come up with a couple more sets of her.
Maybe Dolce or Met Art has a few unpublished sets of Elise lying around somewhere???....one can only hope:)

I agree Sailor. Milagres has sort of flown under the RADAR to me....I've known of her, but I never really "looked" at her closely before this set.
She looks great! Beautiful face and smile....an extremely attractive woman.

Nice work Arkisi!!! This set of Linessa is a 10 in my book.
You have introduced a few exceptionally beautiful women lately and IMO Linessa is the best of them. She has a gorgeous face, stunning blue eyes, and a magnificent body.

With a face as lovely as Linessa's, she's easily one of my top 10 Met Art models.

Thank you Arkisi, I hope you bring us much, much, more of Linessa in the future. She is a remarkable beauty.

Hi Catherine:), this is a very nice set of Nastya, she's as pretty as always. I rate it a 10 for both the photographer and model:)

I hope we are fortunate enough to see much more of your work this year. I'd like for Met Art to not only brings us photos of your new models, but also continue to bring us new sets of your current models too (especially my two favorite ladies....and you know who my two favorite ladies are;)

Thank you Catherine, I appreciate all that you do....please pass along my thanks to your team and Nastya too:)

This is Anna's 9th set and/or video here on Met Art and she has been photographed by 4 different photographers (Rylsky, Oleg Morenko, Stanis Love, and now in this set by Albert Varin) and I must say IMO it doesn't matter who the photographer is because she always looks great.

I've noticed that Anna is quite popular on Met Art's network having sets on Rylsky Art (as Cecile), Errotica Archives (as Selesta), and Erotic Beauty too. I can see why since Anna has a very pretty face, beautiful brown eyes, and a nice slim petite body.

I completely agree JB1718, Catherine's work is not featured nearly enough. She is consistently a top 5 photographer among members. I'd like to see as many sets from Catherine as we do Met Art's other top photographers.

I had a busy morning so I just now logged on to Met Art.
----------------------------

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU CATHERINE!!!!!

Gabriel is GORGEOUS!!! She is an exotic, fascinating, alluring, unique beauty. World Class Beauty!!!
Catherine has mentioned that Gabriel is somewhat shy, but I hope she can convince Gabriel that she has nothing to be shy about.
In my opinion Gabriel is the most underrated model on Met Art. Gabriel is one of my top two models of all time.
----------------------------

This set is fantastic, the best girl/girl set I have ever seen.
Catherine is the only photographer that could produce a set like this. I think it takes a woman's touch and I also think Catherine has a relationship with her models unlike any other photographer.

I am so enamored by the sight of Gabriel, that I failed to mention Vanda looks great too!

Excellent work Catherine.....thank you for bringing Gabriel to us once again:) Please send her my thanks, she's amazing:)
Thank you Catherine (and thank your team too) for making my day:) You are a great woman and a great friend:)
-----------------------------

Lastly, I want to thank "K" for bringing not only another magnificent set from Catherine, but for bringing me another set of Gabriel too.

Below fer_realz mentioned that Catherine has submitted photos of new models. I hope we see sets of these new models (along with her current models) soon. Catherine has a style that is all her own and among the best.

Thank you Matiss for bringing us another extremely nice set of this remarkably beautiful woman.

IMO, Erica is most definitely one of the top models on Met Art.
She came on to the scene just a few months ago, she quickly jumped into the top 25, and has pretty much remained there (or steadily climbed higher) ever since.

If Erica continues to model I think she might become one of Met Art's consistently top rated models for a long, long, time to come.
If Matiss could get a few indoor sets of her, I think the sky's the limit on her potential.
-------------------------

Even though this is another outdoor set (which I prefer) of Erica, I predict it will be quite popular today:)

I really like Gia. She seems to fly under the RADAR....not a highly talked about woman, but definitely one of Met Art's top women IMO.
Gia has a great body....let me restate that....a PERFECT body.
I also love her smile and overall "aura", to me she appears to be a genuinely sweet and kind person.

Nice work Rylsky (my bad, I neglected to put Gia in my list of favorite's), this set is a definite 10 in my book!

Alex, I would hope you that realize many of these sets are months...even years...old when they are published.
I doubt very much anything you (or any of us) say (criticism or praise) has any bearing on Rylsky's (or any other photographer's) work.
The next set we see of Jeff Milton could be (and quite possibly is) actually shot prior to this set or any of her former sets.
The date a set is published has nothing to do with the timeline in which it was shot.

Many thanks to you also swplf2.
I want to thank you for your contribution in helping to make this a civil and enjoyable forum to participate in.
I especially enjoy reading both your and Sailor's comments. You guys crack me up:).....Sailor had me spitting a can of Coke across the room one day. Both you guys are something else:)

Happy New Year to you and all your loved ones.
I hope 2014 proves to be your best year yet.

Happy New Year to you and your loved ones!
I hope 2014 is the year all your dreams come true.
-------------

It's nice to read all the positive responses that this set of Leana is receiving.
Catherine is a perfectionist, she works so hard, she (and her team) puts everything into her work.
I hope 2014 is just the beginning of great things to come for her, both professionally and in her private life.
Catherine is a special woman.

I think Sailor said it best, Laena has that "girl next door" look (and that's a good "thing").
She's like the pretty girl walking down the street, the one you would die for a chance to meet. (Hey, it rhymes!)
Laena has a pretty face and beautiful brown eyes. She is a great new addition to Met Art.Thank you Catherine, I hope this is only the beginning of many more sets of Laena.....and she is just the first of many new models from you in the new year.

I like all of Gabriel's sets (both here on Met Art and her 5 additional sets on Erotic Beauty), but I think this is probably my favorite.

I find myself returning to Gabriel's sets almost daily....she has such an exotic look about her.
Gabriel has gorgeous brown eyes, a beautiful face, and one of Met Art's best bodies.....she is one of my all time favorite and top models.

There is another "thing" about Gabriel I find unique....when I look into her eyes I see so much more than a beautiful woman, I see a woman deep in thought. I would like to know the woman inside this beautiful feminine body.

I realize I'm in the minority on this, but I prefer outdoor sets....and this one is spectacular!
Marica looks fabulous from head to toe....from beginning to end, this set is a definite 10 in my book.

I usually prefer women with smaller breasts, but Marica is an exception, she looks great!
Marica has an exceptionally pretty face, enticing blue eyes, and a magnificent body.

I didn't look to see who the photographer was until I was finished gazing through the images, but when I did, I was not surprise to find out the photographer was Arkisi.
Without a doubt IMO, Arkisi is one of the top 5 photographers in Met Art's network of sites.

Many thanks to both Arkisi and Marica, an excellent set of a beautiful woman.

Luiza, no one will ever replace you as my favorite.
There are many very pretty women on Met Art....and in no way do I want to take anything away from their beauty.....but NO ONE COMPARES TO YOU.

Luiza, your level of beauty is off the charts!

You are not only the most beautiful woman on Met Art, but IMO you are one of the most beautiful women in the history of mankind.
From you our extraordinary facial features, to your brilliant brown eyes, to your delicate full lips....Luiza, you are absolutely adorable.
Add to this your amazing, petite, fabulous body....and you are complete physical perfection.

There are 3000 (+/-) images of you on Met Art's network....and in each and every photo....no matter the lighting, the setting, the amount of make-up, hair style, etc....you are always perfect to me.

All I want for you is complete happiness in life. I want only the best for you, your small son, your new husband, and all the loved ones in your life. My wish is that all your dreams come true.

You are special to me...thank you for allowing me to see your beauty. Spasibo Luiza:)

From the first moment I saw a photo of Luiza I knew I was looking at the image of one of the most beautiful women to ever walk the face of this planet. IMO it is impossible to improve upon Luiza physical beauty, she is perfection.

This is one of those sets that shows IMO what is most important....and that is the model.
Nensi is as cute as can be. Pretty face, dazzling blue/green eyes, darling little smile, and a perfect petite body.

While I could do without the hand prints....it's no big deal to me, Nensi's beauty easily overpowers any negatives in this set.

I think Ivona Su has a gorgeous face.
I'm not certain, but it appears to me that she is Central Asian (possibly Tatar).
IMO many of the most beautiful women in the world are of Tatar ancestry from the Republic of Tatarstan in the Russian Federation (in far Eastern Europe, just west of the Ural Mountains).

My thanks go out to both Arkisi and Ivona Su (you are a beautiful woman).

MarkusluvSofi, you don't need to apologize. Your comment shows genuine and true emotion toward a woman you are attracted to.
I'll go as far as saying if Sofi read your comment she's probably quite moved by the sincerity of your feelings towards her and the kindness you display by wishing nothing but happiness to her in life.

Hopefully no one else will respond between this post and swplf2's and Doug's posts because I want to thank the two of you.

Thank you swplf2
Thank you Doug
-----------------------

swplf2, I'm sure you are aware that I have a lot of respect for you. You have always been a gentleman.

I don't want to get into listing names of all the "regulars" who help make this forum a civil and enjoyable place to "hang out" for fear that I'll miss naming a person or two....I think we all know who one another is anyway.
------------

Doug, I was a little surprised by your anger today. You are usually very nice when stating your opinion. I'll just write it off as you had a bad day.....and we're all entitled to this on occasion.
I doubt anyone who frequents this forum isn't fully aware of your preference for pubic hair.
You definitely notice details that I wouldn't see in a million years....not that noticing details is wrong, because it surely is not.
I prefer some pubic hair myself. I prefer a trimmed look that would normally be hidden under panties or a bikini.
The difference I guess is that the most important thing to me is whether I think the model is beautiful TO ME (I'm not overly concerned what others think about my preferences)....and in doing so, the amount (or lack) of pubic hair is not a deciding factor.
Whatever the model chooses is completely fine with me.

There are many sites that advertise as "hirsute" or "hairy" websites, the problem I've noticed (very limited sample) is that these sites do not have anywhere near the quality of models and/or photographers that Met Art and it's network of sites does.

Thank you for understanding my point Doug, and I am glad I did not offend you.

Doug, I'm not sure what set you off today but something got under your skin.

There are a few who praise each and every girl and set, but if that's what they want to do (or how they actually feel), who I am to say they shouldn't?

I would imagine most of "us" don't sweat the details of a photo shoot the way you (and a couple others) probably do.
I don't care about pubic hair (whether the model has it or not). I don't look at finger nails, toes, dirty feet, how well pubic hair is (or isn't) trimmed, background/setting, etc.....and I venture to guess most others don't either.

Another possibility is that you only see praise from the vast majority of "commenters" because some (like myself) try to stay positive and don't post at all if they dislike a certain set, photographer, and/or model.
Sometimes it's what you don't say that shows how you feel.

The vast majority of the regular crowd gets along very well. They realize that many of the models read these comments and try to take this into account when they start a topic or post a response.
I believe this is why many regulars (including myself) don't like it much when a model is personally attacked.
Most of these girls are in their early to mid twenties, they're very young, and it just doesn't seem right to be critical of any young woman's appearance.
----------------------

On the topic of pubic hair....I'm afraid you're never going to be happy with the majority of the models on Met Art.
I don't know why the trend is to be clean shaven, it really doesn't matter anyway because it will continue until there's a cultural change.
I believe it's just a cycle and it will eventually return to the days when woman let their pubic hair grow.

I am not trying to be rude with anything I wrote....I try to be a realist.
I very much doubt there's anything you can say that's going to change the fact that 90% of the women on Met Art have a clean shaven (or very limited hair) mons pubis and vulva.

I hope you understand my point and don't take this as an attack on you.

I apologize, I could very well be wrong about her ring. Sandra is from Hungary so the ring could be an engagement ring. If so Sandra, I hope the man you are engaged to treats you like a queen.
--------------

IMO, there's not a square inch of Sandra that any changing. She's beautiful just as she is.

hipshot I know Luiza is no longer modeling (she hasn't for while now). It doesn't matter to me that she no longer models.
As long as she is healthy, I don't care how much she weighs.

Luiza remarried earlier this year, so all I want is for her and her son to be happy, and for her husband to love her and treat her with respect.
I wish Luiza and her family all the happiness in the world.

-------------------------

There really isn't only "two"....there really is only "one" and that "one" is Luiza.
From the first moment I saw a photo of Luiza in her first set "Contempo" on Met Models, I knew I saw the image of one of the most beautiful women to ever walk on this planet.
IMO, Luiza is one of the most beautiful women EVER PERIOD. She simply is feminine perfection to my eyes.Now, there are two "others" I put well above every other model on Met Art (and Astrud is one of these two).

Doug, but if any of these woman wear bikinis (or just about any modern swimwear) they have to shave most of their pubic hair.
As hipshot131 stated, if any of these girls model underwear or swimwear for a living then they almost certainly must shave for this too.

It's not only nude modeling that requires it, it's pretty much every modern style of undergarments and swimwear that makes shaving (or drastic trimming) of pubic hair a necessity.

I'm not taking sides....in fact I prefer a degree of pubic hair. I not a fan of an out of control bush (especially in some women), but pubic hair is completely fine with me.

swplf2, I think you "stirred" things up in a good way.
I completely understood that you were not an advocate of fewer photos (so there would be less repetition), or a greater number (so the viewer could select the ones they find most appealing), you simply offered both options.

I tend to agree with those who prefer more photos so any individual can choose the ones they like best.
I also don't mind "perceived" repetition, especially of facial images, because there is almost always some slight difference in the model's facial expression (which can totally change the entire mood of the photo).

All that really matters to me are photos in focus with good lighting and a beautiful woman. Everything else is just frosting on the cake.

Thanks hipshot131.
I also agree with you about the panties in the bath tub....but you know what, this is Astrud and she can do whatever she wants:) She could be wearing a garbage bag and she'd look great, she's awesome.
-------------------------------

To me Luiza is in a league of her own, no one compares to her, she will always be my favorite.

There are only two other women I consider "elite", Astrud is, and will always remain, one of these two other special women.

hipshot131, I agree completely. It's easy to see that Rylsky is close to all his models and I too believe this gives him a tremendous advantage.
The girls he shoots always appear "natural", I can see it in their eyes, their smiles, and their overall facial expressions.
I see it in their bodies too....I would go as far as saying his models really never "pose", nothing ever looks "staged".

No doubt his models also know he will always put their personal interests and safety above all else.
----------------

I concur with Neil too, I'm not sure Rylsky can take a bad photo of Nikia (at least I've never seen one).
She has a radiant smile, sparkling blue/gray eyes, and an aura about her that's simply adorable.

Obviously many people feel the same way since Nikia's usually a top 5 model on this site.

Thank you swpfl2. I also received this email from "K". Even though I'm still a little confused about Rylsky's original comment, I accept K's answer.
After all, the only that matters is that no one is being censored.
-------------------------------

It was never my intent to cause problems, I only wanted to make certain that Rylsky was not being told to stop commenting because a few people were threatening to cancel their subscription if he continued to do so (that is what Rylsky mentioned when this topic was brought up under Virginia Sun's latest set).

swplf2, I wonder if those of "us" who enjoy Rylsky's commentary on this forum should send a message to Met Art as a show of support for him.
I'm sure you remember that your question on the latest Virginia Sun set stared a discussion where Rylsky mentioned he was informed to restrain from commenting on this forum.

It's complete B.S. that a few people can stop Rylsky from commenting. According to Rylsky the best way to state your opinion and address this issue is to contact Met Art.

If anyone wants to send a message to Met Art, the email address is;
comments@metart.com

Thanks swplf2, I learned something new today:) I didn't know what the "Hays Code" was until I googled it and read a few articles.

He had quite a few restrictions imposed on films (language, content, no nudity, etc.). I now better understand why films (and television) made from the mid 30's through the late 60's were very conservative.
I saw where Will H. Hayes was often referred to as the Kenesaw Mountain Landis of the Motion Picture Industry.
-------------

Very nice, Rylsky brings us the pretty green eyed Night as a red head in this set....and she looks great.
Night has a fantastic figure, soft and feminine, yet toned and firm.

My favorite photo is image #5. This black and white, almost sepia colored, photo makes Night appear as if she is right out of the Late Teens/Early Twenties of 20th Century America.
I almost expect to see a REO, Stanley Steamer, or "Tin Lizzie" in the background.
I guess I've watch too many Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, and Harold Lloyd silent films lately.

manuel_du, I understand your question....and thank you for not being rude to rags25.

I appreciate rags25's comments because she is able to get in the models head and give me (us) an idea of what the model is thinking and why she may be posing in such a way in a photo.
She can explain why a model may be holding her hands against her inner thighs, or her breasts, etc....from a woman's perspective.

rags25, I do believe manuel_du was not trying to be rude.
I am quite sure I am not the only one who appreciates your descriptive comments.
After all, men and women think differently and it's nice that you educate us on how a woman thinks (and won't speak for all men, but I'm happy to have a woman give me advice and teach me a few lessons).

I agree with you Neil.
I am seldom critical, but IMO "Evanida" is terrible. I have no idea what Paromov was thinking, but this may be the worst set I've seen a Met Art.
I'm not "knocking" Sabrina at all because she most certainly is a beautiful woman.
I too look forward to her next set, but I hope it is the complete opposite of "Evanida".

If I was sitting in a café with my top 15....I'd ask my #1 to stay.....and the others to leave:):)

I'm really a one woman man:)
----------------

I understand what you mean Rylsky, no one in their right mind could (or would) "rank" women by number.
You know how the saying goes "never meet your hero because he may let you down".....the same thing applies to a beautiful woman.
It takes both inner and outer beauty for anyone to be a truly beautiful person.

hipshot131....I know I'm the "odd-ball".
There are probably a few of "us" who have an all-time favorite, but I'd bet the vast majority of the members are just as you, fer_realz, Sailor, and Rylsky stated....your #1 can (and usually will) change daily.

Sorry Rylsky (you too Roger), I wrote that Mila was from Russia without checking my facts.

Rachsback, I know that Ukraine is not part of Russia....never was actually (it was an SSR a "republic" within the Soviet Union).
One could debate throughout history the separation/status of Ukraine/Russia....starting with Kievan Rus, Golden Horde, Ottoman Empire, and the Russian Empire (including everything else in between).
----------------
I'm quite sure fer_realz understood I was being sarcastic....not critical.

I agree with swplf2, I like it when you "chime" in. I do enjoy your interaction because you do not want simple "thank yous" and "great job Rylsky" type comments.
Some of the conversations that you have joined in on have been informative and even comical at times.

I also agree with you that only those who complain are being heard.
I guarantee there are MANY, MANY, MANY, MORE members who appreciate your participation and hope you can find time to respond on this forum, than there are those who wish you would stay silent.

Arkisi presents an excellent set of the very beautiful Amelie B.
IMO, Arkisi is one of the best photographers on the Met Art network, he consistently brings "us" first class, top notch, galleries of every model he shoots.

Nastya is one of Catherine's most popular models and she certainly is a beautiful young woman. I like how Catherine has photographed her in different settings, and in a few instances in unique themes too.

I like everything we've seen with Nastya, including the sets when she's paired with Susana C and Vanda B.
I hope the combination of Nastya and Catherine update "us" with new sets frequently for a long, long, time.

rachsback, I know that Gabriel A is your favorite....are you aware of the 5 additional sets of Gabriel A over on Erotic Beauty?
If not, you might want check them out. Gabriel is just as beautiful in those sets as she is here.

I hope Met Art listens and brings "us" more of Gabriel A if they have any unpublished sets.
If not, then maybe Catherine has some sets of Gabriel that she hasn't submitted to Met Art???

IMO Gabriel is WAY UNDERATED, she belongs with the top models on this site.

Luiza A & Gabriel A are my two favorite's by far. Both 10+++++'s
-------------------
Also, after I read my initial post I did sound a little confused.....nothing more to say, then I proceeded to say more????.....oh well, my excuse is that it was 3:00am and I was tired:)

Image #84 is magnificent!!!....she's an absolutely gorgeous woman:):):)
Starting with Yarina's beautiful face, down to her perfect firm breasts, gazing upon her tight derriere, and finishing with her fabulous legs and feet (toes too Sailor:)....the image of supreme feminine beauty.

IMO the perfect website would be "Luiza Art".....all Luiza, all the time.
To me Luiza has the most beautiful face on earth, her facial features are like those of a Greek Goddess.
She also has the ability to display emotion through her brown/hazel eyes like none other, which is just another example of why I find Luiza simply irresistible.
Luiza is not just the most beautiful woman on this site, but I believe she is one of the most beautiful women in all of existence.
I've known a few women of comparable beauty, but none more so....I feel it's impossible to improve upon Luiza's beauty.
As of this post there are roughly 3,000 photos of Luiza on Met Art and in every photo, any setting, any lighting, every pose....she is physically perfect from head to toe.

I'm not really a breast man, but Zhanet's breasts are fabulous. I've always thought that she had one of the better bodies on Met Art.
I think Zhanet's body compares really well with Ilze's....both extremely beautiful women with incredible legs and very nice derrieres.

Yarina is a Met Art star, there's nothing more to say than she's just a knock out.
Saying that, she's not my favorite (or probably even in my top 10-15), but she is the kind of girl who captures the attention of every man in sight.

I guess the "wet hair" thing is the closest "thing" I have to a fetish.

It's a long story, but it boils down to a beautiful girl that I met a few days earlier asked me to come over to her apartment the weekend before I was to leave the country. She just got home from work when I met her there and she decided to take a shower. When she stepped out of the shower she came into her kitchen and sat in my lap, wearing nothing but a bathrobe, she sat there and ran a brush through her long dripping wet hair. It's a night I will never forget.

I too prefer a more balanced portrait/landscape ratio. The landscape makes for nice wallpaper photos without too much chopping/editing and many portrait photos can be chopped/edited for nice facial portrait wallpaper.

Absolutely incredible! Fantastic! Fabulous! Perfection!....IMO not only Zelda's best set, but my favorite set from Rylsky period!

Zelda is always beautiful, but in this set she's just flat out amazing.
I like every photo from beginning to end with images #112 - #119 bringing this set to a superb finish (image #118 is my favorite Rylsky photo of all time).

A drop-dead gorgeous woman with wet hair....it doesn't get any better than that. Life is good.Thank you Rylsky

Nastya is simply a beautiful young woman. Of course I have my favorite photos and sets of her, but she always looks nice (I doubt there's a "bad" photo of her in existence).

As hipshot131 mentioned, I wish Nastya would have shown her beautiful smile more in this set....but maybe it was a long day and she might have been a little tired (only Catherine can answer this).

All in all, I like this set very much. Nastya's beautiful and Catherine did a great job with the photography. I gave it a 9 out of 10. If Nastya would have shown me her smile, I would have given the set a 10.

Thank you Catherine the Great:) I appreciate all the hard work that you, your team, and Nastya put in just to bring a little pleasure into our lives.

Thanks fer_realz, I've read a few of mysecret's posts and I don't want him to feel he needs to defend his position.

There are a few of us who joke around with each other about our comments, desires, attractions, fetishes, etc....so I hope mysecret understands that it's o.k. to take some "ribbing" from others when he comments about his fetish/desire.

Hell, anyone who has paid attention to my posts knows that I think Luiza is one of the most beautiful women on earth.
I don't expect others to feel the same way....and no matter what anyone says, it's not going to offend me (or change my opinion about Luiza).

I've been called everything on earth to my face, so a comment I read in this forum isn't going to bother me.
Call me any name you want....more than likely I'll agree with you.

mysecret, I do not mean this as criticism....I'm asking this so I might be able to understand why you find a woman's under arm/arm pit attractive.
Can you explain this?

Again, not meaning to be critical....but to me it would be the same as finding an elbow, a shoulder, or behind a woman's knee especially attractive or sexually stimulating.

I don't have a fetish for any particular body part, so I don't understand fetishes to begin with.

I do have certain "physical body types" I find attractive;

Petite/small frame/average to thin women
Prefer brunettes and red head's (but blondes can be beautiful too)
Eye color makes no difference
I like a pretty face and smile
I'm more of a leg man than a breast man
I also like a nice derriere

A woman has the right to do what she wants to with her body, but I think the term "tramp stamp" fits perfectly....I too dislike (bordering on hate) tattoos. I have yet to see one improve the looks of a woman.

How about a "healthy" obsession? :)
I don't know (or can't imagine) any man not being sexually attracted to a woman's breasts and nipples.
As I stated yesterday, I think it's quite normal.
Now, if I was to walk into your home and you had photos/paintings/sculptures of woman's nipples everywhere I looked....I'd say you have a "nipple" fetish or obsession:)

I knew a guy who had a breast/nipple for a door bell....he had a breast obsession:)
I'm not sure he ever noticed a woman's face/legs/rear/etc...all he ever talked about was a woman's breasts.

I'm with Doug on this one, I'd call this "normal" too.
We're just programmed to find a woman's anatomy attractive.
I don't really consider being attracted to any sexual/reproductive part of a woman's body a "fetish".

Cathleen, you are a gorgeous woman!!!
You are absolutely stunning from head to toe.....you have a beautiful face, pretty eyes, and fabulous body.
Many thanks to you and Arkisi for this perfect debut!!! Amazing woman!!!Incredible!!!
---------------------------

IMO Met Art has a new star....Cathleen is my #2 or #3 favorite model already. I hope to see much, much, much, much more from her. Excellent!!!

Sailor, yesterday it was Suzanna A....today it's Violla....you really need to put a trip to Ukraine on your Bucket List.
-------------
That way, if for some reason you don't make it to Heaven....at least you will have been there on Earth:)

fer_realz, I completely understand your response (and I agree with you). I guess what I did was compare his comment to the one by gswkJu "The seller", and the "The seller" is an ass. He tries to stir up trouble.....uuusssee is just opinionated (which I have no problem with) and doesn't always frame his response/opinion in detail.
gswkJu's comment was not only rude, but disrespectful, confrontational, and degrading.
I take issue with this because Catherine is always kind and thoughtful to everyone. Catherine will answer any question and even try to satisfy the desires of her followers.
She never backs away from criticism (often she hardest on herself).
You and I (along with a few others) are lucky to have Catherine as a friend too....and I don't like anyone being disrespectful to a friend (especially Catherine).

I like out door sets and I think this one works quite well. Natasha's a cute girl with a great big smile and pretty eyes.
She seems like she really enjoyed herself when working with the photographer too.

I have come to like Loreen more and more with each new set. Her smile is addictive....once I see it I can't get enough. She also has those beautiful blue eyes that draw me in too.
One more thing I'd like to add....Loreen could quite possibly have the best body on Met Art....absolutely incredible.

There is something about watching a beautiful woman untie her hair and allow it to drape on her shoulders that I find so seductive....comparable to a woman stepping out of a shower and brushing her still wet hair. MMMMMMMMMMM!!!!

I'm beginning to think that ratings mean squat....I believe too many members "down grade" any model they think might compete with their favorite.
--------------------------------
As Rylsky said....if she's a 10 to you, who cares what someone else thinks anyway?
================================

Nice work deltagamma74:).......Mia looks fantastic!
BTW, I like out door sets (maybe even prefer them).

Come on guys.....uuusssee stated his opinion (it could be considered rude, but not offensive).....so cut him some slack.

The only comments I don't care much for are the ones that criticize a models appearance or a photographers talent.
-----------------------

I wasn't going to comment on this set at all because I am turned off by all of Susana's sets.....not because I don't think she is a beautiful woman....but because I dated a woman who could pass for her twin sister. This girl (the one I dated) was the meanest, nastiest, most self centered person I ever came to know. I couldn't get away from her fast enough.

I want to add another developing story that may concern Catherine and her family. Catherine lives in Kazan.
The airplane that went down last night in Russia crashed at the Kazan, Tatarstan airport killing 50 people on board.

Catherine, I not only pray that you and your family are o.k., but all your friends and loved ones are too.

Catherine, you deserve all the praise you will receive today on this excellent set of Vanda.
You are a perfectionist, and this set is a great example of this. The photography is fantastic.

I think one advantage you have is that many of your models are close personal friends.....easy to understand, you are so sweet:)....and as a result of this your models expressions, smiles, mannerisms, etc. are genuine.

Thank you for all the hard work you put in to bring us these beautiful women.
Also, please thank you team for the hard work they put in too.

Marina, sans make up....and still one of the most beautiful women on Met Art (how many could pull that off???).
Marina has one of the best bodies on Met Art too (super legs and derriere)....she has always kept herself on top physical shape.

I wish you good luck in all you do in life Marina....thank you for the photos.

Rylsky, this set is a very good example of why I admire your work. I don't want to be critical of other photographers work, but your sets always bring out the best of Michelle H.
IMO, the 3 sets you shot of Michelle are light years ahead of the others.

When I look at this set the first thing I noticed is that she seemed to really enjoy working with you.
Everything looks natural, her poses, her expressions....just everything.

I've said many times before that I like a set to start off with a model fully clothed so I can see her as she appears in public (not necessarily outside when I say "public").

Michelle looks great....to me, this is her best set.
This set has everything I like to see.

Rylsky, this set is why I consider you the top photographer on Met Art.

Sailor, look at image #68 in this set and then go back and watch her first video. When she exits the shower it is easy to see that her moles match. She has a large one next to her neck on the left side, and a smaller one above her right breast (others match too).

This is definitely the correct girl....Divina A.

I agree she looks like a different person in this make up.
---------------------

This set is all over the place....what in the hell was Rylsky thinking???
Black and white photos, umbrella, high heels (two different pair), golden surface, water/shower, golden water drops....did I miss anything???Just kidding!!! I'm not sure there is anything I find more attractive than a "wet" beautiful woman.
INO, Rylsky's shower sets are among his best....and this one is another very nice set.

I rather like the golden water drops.....and I also like a few black and white photos mixed in a set too.

As of this post, Luiza has 24 sets on Met Art....roughly 3,000 + or - photos.....and in my opinion she is physical perfection. Every photo, every angle, every setting, no matter hair style, makeup, lighting, etc. Luiza is the most beautiful woman on earth.

Luiza means a lot to me. I want her to be the happiest mother and wife she can possibly be. I pray that she, her family, and her loved ones are forever blessed with good health, and that all of Luiza's dreams come true.

Catherine, is a dear friend and a truly remarkable woman. Catherine is as equally sweet a person on the inside, as she is a physically beautiful woman on the outside. If she chose to, Catherine could be a Cover Model.

I truly am a fortunate man.....thank you Catherine for all that you do.....and thank you for forwarding my comments and thoughts to Luiza.

I understand what you are saying....and I agree with a good portion of it.
The only time I ever respond to a comment like the one you mentioned is simply to state that the model may read their post.
Why write a hurtful comment....what is the point?

There are many models I'm not a big fan of (some quite popular), but I realize everyone has a different opinion....so I don't comment on these models at all.

Rylsky, if anyone hates you then they are an ass. You have never written anything offensive.

I'm not a photographer but I realize some members are, if these people have a problem with your work (or any other Met Art photographer for that metter) who's stopping them from submitting their own photographs to Met Art?

Egotistical is not a word that comes to my mind when reading any of your comments.....I agree that you don't give up easily when you want information (this is probably a habit you picked up back in your days as a prosecutor).....but this can also be a good quality to have.

What I appreciate most about Rylsky is his honesty.
He speaks his mind and respects those who do the same (as long as they are not crude or disrespectful).
I admire the way he goes to such lengths to protect his models privacy and security.

I personally enjoy learning about different cultures and Rylsky has taught me a few things here too.
I hope this forum has helped eliminate a few stereotypes we may have had about each other's country also.
-------------------------

What I like most about Yvonne is that she really seems to enjoy life. She's a beautiful woman with a great big smile and pretty blue eyes.

Thanks fer_realz. swplf2 is a good guy, I hope he (and his family) is/are o.k. I'm pretty sure he said he'd been a member of Met Art for many years so it seems odd that he would allow his subscription to lapse. He also was involved (and started) in many posts.

He was always active and commented on almost every set....he joked a lot about being a member of the senior group. I hope he is o.k. (and still a member)
Is he posting on Rylsky Art??? He seemed pretty interested in Ryslky's website and work.

Neil, I agree Catherine has many beautiful models (no doubt whatsoever)....it's just that I truly believe Luiza is one of the most beautiful woman on earth. IMHO, very few woman compare with her level of beauty.
----------------------------------

I joined Met Art because of Luiza, and I remain a member because of Catherine.

But....it's a shame that ratings can be skewed by members who give a "10" to their favorite, but vote a "1 or 2" for any model that is in competition with their favorite.
--------------------------

This is an example why this system doesn't work fairly;

As I write this comment Jeff Milton is #7. If a member likes Jeff Milton better than Flavia A (currently #6) or Lily C (currently #5) then they could give Jeff Milton a "10" but Flavia A and Lily C a "1" simply to help Jeff Milton move up in popularity.

The current system is too easy to manipulate.
---------------------------

It would be a fairer system if a models popularity was based upon how many "added as a favorite" votes they receive.
This way only positive votes would matter.

The rating system means nothing....too easily rigged and abused:(
--------------

As I told Rylsky earlier, I will not give any model less than a 9.....if she's not a 9 or 10 to me, I just don't vote for her at all.
I don't want to "down grade" a model that might be another members favorite.

I understand your attempt to get a response from Alex (but I doubt he'll answer.....I'm sure you doubt this too).

I have gone back and read many of his comments.
Almost all his comments are critical of the photographer's work.
Usually the same complaint he has with this set (the models look like Tussauds' "House of Wax" figures).

Maybe he is a professional photographer???? (but I doubt he has his own site).
If he is, he should give specific details so you are able to counter or defend against his criticism.
Without details his critical remarks mean nothing.
---------------------

I know you don't need to hear this...but,

Just remember, you have nothing that needs to be proved.
You have many, many, people who like your style of photography....and you have shot more top models than anyone else.

Some people seem to enjoy stirring up trouble (I guess it just their personality....who knows???)

Very nice Rylsky, I love the way you shot this set. As always, Nikia looks great!
------------------
Also, as for the guy who complained about the black and white photos included in Shereen's set, I happen like it when you add this little "touch" (so, thank you).

swplf2, yes, I do admire Catherine.
It's early Monday morning in Kazan, so it might be a few hours before Catherine reads these posts.

I'm pretty certain she will answer your (and Sailor's) question.
If Catherine doesn't return to this thread, I'll make sure she receives the message that your wife would like to get a necklace like the one Kira is wearing.

Image #64 is perfection, in my life I have never seen a more beautiful sight.
Luiza is not only my favorite model, but from the moment I saw Luiza in her first set (Met Model/Erotic Beauty set "Contempo"), I knew I was looking at one of the most beautiful women on earth.

Astrud, my favorite Rylsky model:) Astrud is a magnificent woman, an exceptional beauty.
She's incredibly beautiful from head to toe, and IMHO she has the prettiest smile of all the Met Art models too.

Now about the "wet set".....I love it, great job Rylsky!!!

Nothing compares to the sight and smell of a beautiful woman as she steps out of the shower with freshly washed hair.
Her skin soft and smooth, with the aroma from her hair as that of fresh cut flowers, MMMMMMMMMMMM

I find myself returning to Luiza's page every day (usually multiple times each day).
In my opinion Luiza's level of beauty is off the charts.

Luiza is beautiful from head to toe, but it is her gorgeous face and pretty brown/hazel eyes that I find the most stunning.
--------------------------------
Image #38 in this set is quite possibly the most beautiful sight I have ever seen.

Rylsky, last week you called me the "detective", this week it is you:)

When I wrote "I have no use for any man who doesn't respect woman, but even more so for a woman like Catherine"....I knew you would question this:)

The difference is this, in my communication with Catherine she has been very kind to me (respecting her privacy I will not go any farther than this). I consider Catherine a friend.
--------------------------

Rylsky, that is a very good question (believe me I have thought about this).

I understand that people on the internet could be anybody (man or woman).
I also understand why you refuse to give out any information about your models (You have no idea who the person asking for this is. The person asking for information could be a crazy stalker).

I cannot divulge how (or why) I believe Catherine is who she claims to be for privacy reasons. Just like you, I respect the privacy of people.

I guess there are subtle hints as to who a person is. A person can only hide a secret for so long before they are exposed as a fraud.
-----------------------

I'll put it this way, You speak (more correctly write) as a man would. The words you choose, your style, your personality, is like that of a man.

Could I be wrong?....Yes, it is quite possible that I am wrong.
But in the end, what difference would it make???

I will never meet you or your models in person. I will never meet Catherine in person either.
I still admire you for the respect show towards your models and to people in general.
I respect Catherine for the kindness she has shown me.
--------------------------

swplf2, thank you.
I worry when I state my opinion that I might offend someone....or worse, wrongfully speak on the behalf of someone.

It's my hope that anyone who reads my comments understands that I am only stating my opinion and I'm not trying to influence or "preach" to anyone.
----------------------------------

I mentioned in a post a few days ago about certain members who make this forum a civil and pleasant place to offer our opinions, I failed to mention you by name, but you most certainly are in this group.
----------------------------------

Rylsky, deltagamma74, and Catherine have taught me something also, people are the same all around the world.
I have a lot of respect for each of these photographers more for the person they are, than the quality of their work (although their work is excellent too).

I've gotten to know Catherine quite well and she is special to me. She is a good friend and a great person.
It bothers me when anyone is rude to her because she tries so hard to please everyone (and I have no use for any man who doesn't respect woman, but even more so for a woman like Catherine).
-------------------------

There are certain models who are popular and tend to keep existing memberships active and new memberships joining.

Photographers present sets they take of current models and also sets from new models they shoot.
Met Art looks at these sets and chooses which ones they want (based upon which ones they feel will be popular among their members).
Met Art then decides when they will publish these sets (it could be immediately, a month later, a year later, etc....this is why some sets are several years old and the sequence of sets seem out of order).

Some of the models remain popular for a long period of time and Met Art may ask for more photos/sets of these models from the photographer (the photographer may have sets they didn't submit earlier to Met Art, or they may attempt to photograph the "popular" model again if she is available).

If Met Art publishes a set of a model and it isn't very popular, then Met Art informs the photographer they no longer want any photos/sets from this model (I assume a few photographers may turn to other web sites with these sets that are rejected by Met Art....which might be why some end up on lesser known, lower quality, sites).

deltagamma74 explained how certain sets fit into Met Art's policies/restrictions and other sets are published in Sex Art and similar sites.

I probably think too much....and I may be completely wrong about all of this.

---------------------------------

I cannot speak for Rylsky, his arrangement with Met Art is his business.
He explained quite clearly how his "system" works.
He allows the model to make the choice if she chooses to do so.

I don't think Rylsky gives a damn about a rating system....what does it really prove anyway?
Vote total's can, and probably are, skewed by members who vote for their favorite...but vote "down" anyone who might be a competitor.

If you do not know the date of a set, then how do you know if the photographer is actually listening to your suggestion/critique to a certain set?
How would you know if the photographer has made an attempt to incorporate any suggestions if the set you commented on is in reality "newer" than the upcoming set (since the upcoming set may in fact have been shot earlier than the previous set).

Confusing enough yet???:)

Example:
If you commented about this set and asked for a change, but the next set from Alysha was actually shot before this one, then your suggestion really meant nothing.

Is this your concern Doug?
-----------------------------

If so, then I guess that's something that will need to be left unknown.

As Rylsky stated admirably, he will not give out any information that concerns his models so as to protect their identity and safety.

Even if we don't understand why something that we consider an innocent question needs to be kept private, Rylsky assures us it is crucial and this information must be kept private for the sake of the model.

We really have no right to any information about these models.

My guess is Rylsky answer is quite simple....enjoy the beautiful women.
As I stated earlier, this site is all about fantasy (let your imagination wander wherever it may go).

I hope my comment isn't offensive in any way (I'm just trying to understand the situation/question a little better.

Frankieboaby, you are most definitely in the minority with your opinion.
Alysha is one of the most beautiful women on Met Art, and her continual place in the top 10 (usually top 5) in popularity, only proves my point.

I guess to really understand your feelings about Alysha, I will need for you to give me an example of what you consider a beautiful woman.
--------------------------

Is there any particular model on Met Art that fits your description of a beautiful or gorgeous woman???

Neil, yesterday I noticed a new set from Nelly was coming and I have been waiting to read your response (I know she's special to you).
Very nice comment you wrote and I hope Nelly gets a chance to read it.

I like that we each have a favorite (Luiza is mine....big surprise there, right?) and we get somewhat emotional when we see them.

I was speaking the truth when mentioned a week or so ago that I consider you a true gentleman because you are always courteous and respectful to both the model and photographer.

It's great that you have become such a huge supporter and friend of Catherine because she is quite special.
--------------------------------------

Respectful is stating one's opinion without name calling and/or being rude to another human being.

Telling the truth (which is almost always an opinion, not "truth", since "truth" is in the eye of the beholder), doesn't require name calling or demeaning comments.

An example that was posted not too long ago by a member went something like this...."she's fat and ugly".
The models might, and often do, read these comments....so why in the hell would anyone make a statement such as my example???

That is a rude, obnoxious, and disrespectful comment and the type I am speaking of.

Luiza, I honestly do believe, from the bottom of my heart, that you are the most beautiful woman on earth.
You have gorgeous brown/hazel eyes and the prettiest facial features I have ever seen.
You are physical perfection, it is impossible to improve upon your beauty.

My thanks go out to both you Luiza, and to Catherine, for bringing you into my life.

fer_realz, Catherine really is an amazing woman. She's so sweet and kind to all of us....and she has a great sense of humor too.

You, Neil, Kilroy, and several other members (I apologize to these members I have not individually named) are always respectful of the model and the photographer even when a set may not be completely to your liking. This is the "army" I refer to.

It is you "guys" who make this forum a civil and pleasant place to visit and offer our opinions.

I also highly respect every photographer who has responded to our comments.....each one has their own personality and style, and I admire each for slightly a different reason.

Catherine is special though, she wants to please everyone....and it really bothers me when anyone is rude to her. I am proud of her for standing her ground lately. She's a strong woman, and I like that:)

Doug, I don't mean this as a criticism....more so as an observation of your comments.
------------------------
Wouldn't it just be easier to enjoy the sight of beautiful women instead of putting so much effort in dissecting each set?

Sailor,
I agree with you completely with regards to B-G porn. I have no desire whatsoever to see another man without clothes.
--------------
I do differ with you on this though, I'm not a big fan of lesbian porn either.
I plain and simply do not like any hard core porn at all.
--------------
I prefer exactly what Met art is....Erotic Art.

I understand your criticism and I see some validity in it, but I also can see why this setting was chosen.

The step, bed, and sofa offer several areas for Flavia to sit, lie down, and pose so that she doesn't appear "unnatural" (or isn't in some weird, contorted, twisted, or odd looking shape that some photographers shoot).

This is only my opinion....if the model is beautiful (Flavia definitely fits this category), the model is in focus, and her skin and lighting looks natural.....the background usually doesn't matter to me (my complete attention is on the model).

Well, I live in the Midwestern part of the USA and it is 8:24PM as I start this comment, if you are anywhere in Europe/Africa/South America/Asia/Australia.....it is either late night of September 26st, or early morning of September 27th:)

Neil, I was a member of Met Art years ago (well before the message board) but I have read through many comments and I agree with Rylsky that you are always respectful of the model (I would guess this is why the models on RA voted for you). I look for your comments (and a few others) when I enter this forum.

I've also read many of Rylsky's comments and I admire that he demands respect for the woman he photographs. He puts their safety before anything else. I've even read a comment in which he defended a model who was photographed by another photographer.

Luiza, in image #60 you are gorgeous (as always), and in image #61 your smile is the most beautiful sight I have ever seen.
If I saw you in person I would be stunned....unable to say a single word.
I would be speechless when confronted by your outstanding beauty.

I want to thank you Luiza, and Catherine also, for allowing me to see such physical beauty. You are extraordinary Luiza!

Catherine, as always, you are so sweet and kind:)
You deserve all the praise you receive for your outstanding photography.....and for taking time out of your day to answer questions from a "debil" (moron) like me:)

Rylsky, you are a very fortunate man to work with so many beautiful women.
Astrud is gorgeous. Everything about her is remarkable. Not only is she one of the most beautiful women I've seen, she has a pretty smile too....and she appears to be a very nice person also.

Thank you for explaining the process a little better (to an idiot like me:), I know nothing about photography.
My apologies if I appeared to be rude when asking this question, I didn't understand why I saw this man.

I am an artist too (designer/drawings/sketches), so I have a pretty good eye for detail (I guess this is why I noticed the man in the reflection).
------------------------------------------
I can see that you try to make everyone happy, but that is impossible.
I am happy to see that you are defending yourself much better when people are rude, and remember, you also have many admirers who are there to help too.

I read that Nastya K was recently arrested and may be facing up to 6 years in prison for posing nude in front of a Government building in Kazan.
The article also stated Tatarstan (and the city of Kazan) are predominately Muslim (but mainly secular) and the local officials may not prosecute.

Are you always so sweet?:)
I really like your photography and the models you work with.

I understand that the models often read these comments, so I want to make sure I don't offend Susana because she surely is a beautiful woman....but,
I have a hard time looking at Susana because I dated a woman who looks so much like Susana, that she could have been her identical twin (and it didn't end well).

Thank you for bringing so many beautiful woman to us through your photography, and thank you for your kindness.

I agree completely Ansel.
Luiza is physical perfection, a Goddess!
I do believe it is impossible to improve upon her beauty, she is simply stunning.

Luiza has a gorgeous face and beautiful brown eyes (from any angle, in any lighting, whether frontal or profile, her beauty is unsurpassed).
I also want to mention she has a fabulous body too. She's an incredible woman.

Luiza, I see that you are now the mother of a little boy:) Your son has the prettiest mother in the world!!!
Thank you Luiza for allowing me to see your beauty.

Arina has a beautiful face. I generally prefer women who are thin and/or petite, but Arina has a nice body and looks great. She's a very pretty woman.

I might be in the minority, but I'm one who prefers outdoor settings over studio settings.
Studio settings are much more controllable with lighting and such, but I like natural lighting and the various backdrops that outdoor sets provide.

I just love nature scenes (especially when a beautiful woman is included).

Thank you Matiss for bringing us another extremely nice set of this remarkably beautiful woman.

IMO, Erica is most definitely one of the top models on Met Art.
She came on to the scene just a few months ago, she quickly jumped into the top 25, and has pretty much remained there (or steadily climbed higher) ever since.

If Erica continues to model I think she might become one of Met Art's consistently top rated models for a long, long, time to come.
If Matiss could get a few indoor sets of her, I think the sky's the limit on her potential.
-------------------------

Even though this is another outdoor set (which I prefer) of Erica, I predict it will be quite popular today:)

I dated a girl years ago who hated her freckles and wanted so badly to do away with them and/or cover them up no matter how hard I tried to convince her "they" made her look even more beautiful.
I wish more women would realize that many men find freckles very attractive.....and to prove my point Lukki Lima is a fine example!

Lukki Lima looks fantastic in image #17 (among others). I love your expression in this image.
I think Lukki has a gorgeous face and her freckles only enhance her beauty.

Great work Karl Simi!
My thanks go out to both you and Lukki Lima.....
Thank you very much for starting out my Monday with this nice set of photos.

I must agree. I was pleasantly surprised by this set, Camilla looks exceptionally nice.
I also like how the dark background makes Camilla the focal point of each shot. It's a style that harkens back to the days when Met Art was M-E-T.

Luiza, no one will ever replace you as my favorite.
There are many very pretty women on Met Art....and in no way do I want to take anything away from their beauty.....but NO ONE COMPARES TO YOU.

Luiza, your level of beauty is off the charts!

You are not only the most beautiful woman on Met Art, but IMO you are one of the most beautiful women in the history of mankind.
From you our extraordinary facial features, to your brilliant brown eyes, to your delicate full lips....Luiza, you are absolutely adorable.
Add to this your amazing, petite, fabulous body....and you are complete physical perfection.

There are 3000 (+/-) images of you on Met Art's network....and in each and every photo....no matter the lighting, the setting, the amount of make-up, hair style, etc....you are always perfect to me.

All I want for you is complete happiness in life. I want only the best for you, your small son, your new husband, and all the loved ones in your life. My wish is that all your dreams come true.

You are special to me...thank you for allowing me to see your beauty. Spasibo Luiza:)

Catherine, you deserve all the praise you will receive today on this excellent set of Vanda.
You are a perfectionist, and this set is a great example of this. The photography is fantastic.

I think one advantage you have is that many of your models are close personal friends.....easy to understand, you are so sweet:)....and as a result of this your models expressions, smiles, mannerisms, etc. are genuine.

Thank you for all the hard work you put in to bring us these beautiful women.
Also, please thank you team for the hard work they put in too.

I have come to like Loreen more and more with each new set. Her smile is addictive....once I see it I can't get enough. She also has those beautiful blue eyes that draw me in too.
One more thing I'd like to add....Loreen could quite possibly have the best body on Met Art....absolutely incredible.

There is something about watching a beautiful woman untie her hair and allow it to drape on her shoulders that I find so seductive....comparable to a woman stepping out of a shower and brushing her still wet hair. MMMMMMMMMMM!!!!

Neil, I agree Catherine has many beautiful models (no doubt whatsoever)....it's just that I truly believe Luiza is one of the most beautiful woman on earth. IMHO, very few woman compare with her level of beauty.
----------------------------------

I joined Met Art because of Luiza, and I remain a member because of Catherine.

Nice work Arkisi!!! This set of Linessa is a 10 in my book.
You have introduced a few exceptionally beautiful women lately and IMO Linessa is the best of them. She has a gorgeous face, stunning blue eyes, and a magnificent body.

With a face as lovely as Linessa's, she's easily one of my top 10 Met Art models.

Thank you Arkisi, I hope you bring us much, much, more of Linessa in the future. She is a remarkable beauty.

I realize I'm in the minority on this, but I prefer outdoor sets....and this one is spectacular!
Marica looks fabulous from head to toe....from beginning to end, this set is a definite 10 in my book.

I usually prefer women with smaller breasts, but Marica is an exception, she looks great!
Marica has an exceptionally pretty face, enticing blue eyes, and a magnificent body.

I didn't look to see who the photographer was until I was finished gazing through the images, but when I did, I was not surprise to find out the photographer was Arkisi.
Without a doubt IMO, Arkisi is one of the top 5 photographers in Met Art's network of sites.

Many thanks to both Arkisi and Marica, an excellent set of a beautiful woman.

Arkisi presents an excellent set of the very beautiful Amelie B.
IMO, Arkisi is one of the best photographers on the Met Art network, he consistently brings "us" first class, top notch, galleries of every model he shoots.

I really like Gia. She seems to fly under the RADAR....not a highly talked about woman, but definitely one of Met Art's top women IMO.
Gia has a great body....let me restate that....a PERFECT body.
I also love her smile and overall "aura", to me she appears to be a genuinely sweet and kind person.

Nice work Rylsky (my bad, I neglected to put Gia in my list of favorite's), this set is a definite 10 in my book!

Marina, sans make up....and still one of the most beautiful women on Met Art (how many could pull that off???).
Marina has one of the best bodies on Met Art too (super legs and derriere)....she has always kept herself on top physical shape.

I wish you good luck in all you do in life Marina....thank you for the photos.

As of this post, Luiza has 24 sets on Met Art....roughly 3,000 + or - photos.....and in my opinion she is physical perfection. Every photo, every angle, every setting, no matter hair style, makeup, lighting, etc. Luiza is the most beautiful woman on earth.

Luiza means a lot to me. I want her to be the happiest mother and wife she can possibly be. I pray that she, her family, and her loved ones are forever blessed with good health, and that all of Luiza's dreams come true.

Catherine, is a dear friend and a truly remarkable woman. Catherine is as equally sweet a person on the inside, as she is a physically beautiful woman on the outside. If she chose to, Catherine could be a Cover Model.

I truly am a fortunate man.....thank you Catherine for all that you do.....and thank you for forwarding my comments and thoughts to Luiza.

It should read...."I have seen perfection, and HER name is Luiza".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Luiza is a GORGEOUS woman, she has one of the most beautiful faces in the entire world. She is adorable.

Even though I prefer thinner more petite women, Isabella is most definitely a beautiful woman.

I can completely understand why anyone would find Isabella breathtaking, incredible, adorable, gorgeous, etc. (insert the adjective you prefer)
Isabella has several attributes/assets that many men find most attractive.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Once again Arkisi has shown why I believe he is one of Met Art's top photographers.
This is an excellent photo set of the very beautiful Isabella.
Great work Arkisi.

From the first moment I saw a photo of Luiza I knew I was looking at the image of one of the most beautiful women to ever walk the face of this planet. IMO it is impossible to improve upon Luiza physical beauty, she is perfection.

Absolutely incredible! Fantastic! Fabulous! Perfection!....IMO not only Zelda's best set, but my favorite set from Rylsky period!

Zelda is always beautiful, but in this set she's just flat out amazing.
I like every photo from beginning to end with images #112 - #119 bringing this set to a superb finish (image #118 is my favorite Rylsky photo of all time).

A drop-dead gorgeous woman with wet hair....it doesn't get any better than that. Life is good.Thank you Rylsky

Luiza, I honestly do believe, from the bottom of my heart, that you are the most beautiful woman on earth.
You have gorgeous brown/hazel eyes and the prettiest facial features I have ever seen.
You are physical perfection, it is impossible to improve upon your beauty.

My thanks go out to both you Luiza, and to Catherine, for bringing you into my life.

I read that Nastya K was recently arrested and may be facing up to 6 years in prison for posing nude in front of a Government building in Kazan.
The article also stated Tatarstan (and the city of Kazan) are predominately Muslim (but mainly secular) and the local officials may not prosecute.

I agree completely Ansel.
Luiza is physical perfection, a Goddess!
I do believe it is impossible to improve upon her beauty, she is simply stunning.

Luiza has a gorgeous face and beautiful brown eyes (from any angle, in any lighting, whether frontal or profile, her beauty is unsurpassed).
I also want to mention she has a fabulous body too. She's an incredible woman.

Luiza, I see that you are now the mother of a little boy:) Your son has the prettiest mother in the world!!!
Thank you Luiza for allowing me to see your beauty.

Xola's appearance is much like that of Tatar Princesses I've seen in films on the Golden Horde and Volga Bulgars.
The people and culture of this area of Russia/Eurasia is unknown to many Westerners, but it has a complex, rich, and proud history.
My research on this part of our world has taught me to not only appreciate their glorious past, but also admire the diverse culture of present day Tatarstan with it's blend of Islam and Orthodox Christianity living together in a peaceful society.
Aesthetically the architecture of Kazan and Tatarstan is phenomenal, but most beautiful of all is it's women:)

Magwich,
I'm a big fan of Erica and Matiss....and I personally like outdoor sets, especially those with a lot of color (Erica's previous set is a rather good example of this as are several of Violla's).What concerns me is that many people have said how much they dislike outdoor sets and I worry this will eventually have an effect of whether we see more from her.....and I would like to see Erica stick around here for a long, long, time.

As I stated in my original post, I think she is a gorgeous woman....top fashion model type (if she chooses to do so).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

P.S., my only complaint is that I would like to see her in a photo set where she doesn't have to squint.

I think she looks great AS IS!!!!
Thankfully she didn't "enhance" her breasts.
Way too many women believe that all men are attracted to large breasts.....this simply is wrong. Many of us prefer women with smaller breasts and smaller frames.
I'm glad that Lorena found out soon enough that her natural breasts her are very nice and they add to her overall beauty.

Thank you "K" for publishing another set of Catherine's work this week. I (and many others) appreciate all that you do and realize it is impossible to satisfy everyone.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nice work Catherine:)
I generally prefer to see models in "solo" sets, but Susana and Nastya work well together (just as Vanda and Gabriel do).
I hope we are fortunate enough to see sets of both Susana/Nastya and Vanda/Gabriel many more times in the future.

Many thanks Catherine:) You deserve all the praise you receive on this set.
Please pass along my thanks to the rest of your team and let them know I appreciate all their hard work.

I had a busy morning so I just now logged on to Met Art.
----------------------------

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU CATHERINE!!!!!

Gabriel is GORGEOUS!!! She is an exotic, fascinating, alluring, unique beauty. World Class Beauty!!!
Catherine has mentioned that Gabriel is somewhat shy, but I hope she can convince Gabriel that she has nothing to be shy about.
In my opinion Gabriel is the most underrated model on Met Art. Gabriel is one of my top two models of all time.
----------------------------

This set is fantastic, the best girl/girl set I have ever seen.
Catherine is the only photographer that could produce a set like this. I think it takes a woman's touch and I also think Catherine has a relationship with her models unlike any other photographer.

I am so enamored by the sight of Gabriel, that I failed to mention Vanda looks great too!

Excellent work Catherine.....thank you for bringing Gabriel to us once again:) Please send her my thanks, she's amazing:)
Thank you Catherine (and thank your team too) for making my day:) You are a great woman and a great friend:)
-----------------------------

Lastly, I want to thank "K" for bringing not only another magnificent set from Catherine, but for bringing me another set of Gabriel too.

Below fer_realz mentioned that Catherine has submitted photos of new models. I hope we see sets of these new models (along with her current models) soon. Catherine has a style that is all her own and among the best.

This is one of those sets that shows IMO what is most important....and that is the model.
Nensi is as cute as can be. Pretty face, dazzling blue/green eyes, darling little smile, and a perfect petite body.

While I could do without the hand prints....it's no big deal to me, Nensi's beauty easily overpowers any negatives in this set.

hipshot131, I agree completely. It's easy to see that Rylsky is close to all his models and I too believe this gives him a tremendous advantage.
The girls he shoots always appear "natural", I can see it in their eyes, their smiles, and their overall facial expressions.
I see it in their bodies too....I would go as far as saying his models really never "pose", nothing ever looks "staged".

No doubt his models also know he will always put their personal interests and safety above all else.
----------------

I concur with Neil too, I'm not sure Rylsky can take a bad photo of Nikia (at least I've never seen one).
She has a radiant smile, sparkling blue/gray eyes, and an aura about her that's simply adorable.

Obviously many people feel the same way since Nikia's usually a top 5 model on this site.

Thank you swpfl2. I also received this email from "K". Even though I'm still a little confused about Rylsky's original comment, I accept K's answer.
After all, the only that matters is that no one is being censored.
-------------------------------

It was never my intent to cause problems, I only wanted to make certain that Rylsky was not being told to stop commenting because a few people were threatening to cancel their subscription if he continued to do so (that is what Rylsky mentioned when this topic was brought up under Virginia Sun's latest set).

I like out door sets and I think this one works quite well. Natasha's a cute girl with a great big smile and pretty eyes.
She seems like she really enjoyed herself when working with the photographer too.

I'm beginning to think that ratings mean squat....I believe too many members "down grade" any model they think might compete with their favorite.
--------------------------------
As Rylsky said....if she's a 10 to you, who cares what someone else thinks anyway?
================================

Nice work deltagamma74:).......Mia looks fantastic!
BTW, I like out door sets (maybe even prefer them).

I find myself returning to Luiza's page every day (usually multiple times each day).
In my opinion Luiza's level of beauty is off the charts.

Luiza is beautiful from head to toe, but it is her gorgeous face and pretty brown/hazel eyes that I find the most stunning.
--------------------------------
Image #38 in this set is quite possibly the most beautiful sight I have ever seen.

Arina has a beautiful face. I generally prefer women who are thin and/or petite, but Arina has a nice body and looks great. She's a very pretty woman.

I might be in the minority, but I'm one who prefers outdoor settings over studio settings.
Studio settings are much more controllable with lighting and such, but I like natural lighting and the various backdrops that outdoor sets provide.

I just love nature scenes (especially when a beautiful woman is included).

I agree fer_realz.
I also like the portraits of Breann.....and judging by her facial expressions, she seems to be a very sweet lady too.
IMO, the greatest physical attribute of any woman is a beautiful smile:)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nice debut set Catherine, I hope Breann is with Met Art for quite some time.

Two new models in a matter of weeks (Xola and Breann), do you have any other new models waiting to make their debut soon Catherine?

Nice set Catherine.
I haven't heard from Nastya in a while, but I suspect she will like this set very much. The colouring and lighting work very well with Nastya's skin tone.
My favourite set of the day.

Luiza, if I met you in person I would simply say....
Words cannot adequately describe how beautiful I believe you are.
Your pretty brown eyes and gorgeous face are unsurpassed.
In my opinion, without doubt, you are one of the most beautiful women on earth. You are special. Spasibo.

I think Erica is a gorgeous woman, but I hope this is the last of this series Matiss shot of Erica that day at the beach.
It's my guess that if Matiss doesn't have more work of Erica at another location (or better yet indoors), her ratings will begin to plummet.

I think Erica has fashion model beauty. She is tall enough and a physically beautiful woman in every way.
IMO, if she hasn't done any fashion modeling to date, it can only be that she hasn't been "discovered" yet.

I still like this set quite a bit....but not as much as her previous sets.
It seems to me that all of her work so far has been shot during the same photo session (and all Mattiss did was move her around the same general area and take photos of her with a different background).

Thank you Kilroy!!!
I was sure I wasn't alone (you, fer_realz, and others have confirmed this) in believing that Met Art does not publish enough of Catherine's work.

Catherine supposedly has photo sets of new models....6 of her models are in Met Art's list of top rated models.....with a track record like that, why hasn't Met Art allowed "us" to see these new ones???

Fantastic set Rylsky!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Evita Lima with her large breasts is not necessarily my "type", but she has a beautiful face (IMO, one of the prettiest on Met Art) and looks fabulous here.

Correct me if I am wrong Catherine, but....
I am pretty sure that Catherine is working on another photo shoot this week, so I would imagine this is why we haven't heard from her as of yet.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I hope you are able to find a little time to join us Catherine, I always enjoy reading your responses:)

When you think about this set being shot under the conditions you described it is quite amazing that it all came together so well (I believe this was only possible because of Catherine's warm and welcoming personality along with her photographic skills).

I'm sure Catherine really appreciates the fact that you've helped explain the difficulty that she (and all photographers....including you) face in their line of work.

I like everything I seen of Lukki Lima to date and IMO this is her best set yet.
I think she has a beautiful face, gorgeous brown eyes, a pretty smile, cute freckles, and a nice slender body. Oh, and I like her long brown hair too:)

Today is sort of a day of Met Art "Heavy Weights".....with Catherine, Arkisi, Rylsky, and Leonardo all presenting models in Met Art's top 150.

Of the 4, this set is my favorite.
Great work Arkisi (I've been stating this a lot lately!)

This is an excellent set of the very beautiful Lukki Lima....my second "10" of the day, but in this case I'll call it a "10+"!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On a different topic;
I don't necessarily look for this specifically, but I seem to find thinner, smaller framed, 5'-3" to 5'-7" (160mm-170mm), women the most attractive (both here and in "real" life).
Whenever I encounter a model on Met Art that I consider one of their best....I check her "stats" and inevitably she falls into the range I described. A couple exceptions being Alysha A and Erica B (both 5'-9"/175mm)

You surely understand that unattractive to one can be gorgeous to another.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We all have our own opinion of who (or what) the perfect woman is, but I try to show respect to all the models because I realize comments can be hurtful.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My opinion is just that....MY OPINION....and even though Balina not a favorite of mine, she is a favorite of many other members.

Hi Catherine:), this is a very nice set of Nastya, she's as pretty as always. I rate it a 10 for both the photographer and model:)

I hope we are fortunate enough to see much more of your work this year. I'd like for Met Art to not only brings us photos of your new models, but also continue to bring us new sets of your current models too (especially my two favorite ladies....and you know who my two favorite ladies are;)

Thank you Catherine, I appreciate all that you do....please pass along my thanks to your team and Nastya too:)

This is Anna's 9th set and/or video here on Met Art and she has been photographed by 4 different photographers (Rylsky, Oleg Morenko, Stanis Love, and now in this set by Albert Varin) and I must say IMO it doesn't matter who the photographer is because she always looks great.

I've noticed that Anna is quite popular on Met Art's network having sets on Rylsky Art (as Cecile), Errotica Archives (as Selesta), and Erotic Beauty too. I can see why since Anna has a very pretty face, beautiful brown eyes, and a nice slim petite body.

I think Sailor said it best, Laena has that "girl next door" look (and that's a good "thing").
She's like the pretty girl walking down the street, the one you would die for a chance to meet. (Hey, it rhymes!)
Laena has a pretty face and beautiful brown eyes. She is a great new addition to Met Art.Thank you Catherine, I hope this is only the beginning of many more sets of Laena.....and she is just the first of many new models from you in the new year.

hipshot I know Luiza is no longer modeling (she hasn't for while now). It doesn't matter to me that she no longer models.
As long as she is healthy, I don't care how much she weighs.

Luiza remarried earlier this year, so all I want is for her and her son to be happy, and for her husband to love her and treat her with respect.
I wish Luiza and her family all the happiness in the world.

-------------------------

There really isn't only "two"....there really is only "one" and that "one" is Luiza.
From the first moment I saw a photo of Luiza in her first set "Contempo" on Met Models, I knew I saw the image of one of the most beautiful women to ever walk on this planet.
IMO, Luiza is one of the most beautiful women EVER PERIOD. She simply is feminine perfection to my eyes.Now, there are two "others" I put well above every other model on Met Art (and Astrud is one of these two).

Thanks hipshot131.
I also agree with you about the panties in the bath tub....but you know what, this is Astrud and she can do whatever she wants:) She could be wearing a garbage bag and she'd look great, she's awesome.
-------------------------------

To me Luiza is in a league of her own, no one compares to her, she will always be my favorite.

There are only two other women I consider "elite", Astrud is, and will always remain, one of these two other special women.

I agree with swplf2, I like it when you "chime" in. I do enjoy your interaction because you do not want simple "thank yous" and "great job Rylsky" type comments.
Some of the conversations that you have joined in on have been informative and even comical at times.

I also agree with you that only those who complain are being heard.
I guarantee there are MANY, MANY, MANY, MORE members who appreciate your participation and hope you can find time to respond on this forum, than there are those who wish you would stay silent.

IMO the perfect website would be "Luiza Art".....all Luiza, all the time.
To me Luiza has the most beautiful face on earth, her facial features are like those of a Greek Goddess.
She also has the ability to display emotion through her brown/hazel eyes like none other, which is just another example of why I find Luiza simply irresistible.
Luiza is not just the most beautiful woman on this site, but I believe she is one of the most beautiful women in all of existence.
I've known a few women of comparable beauty, but none more so....I feel it's impossible to improve upon Luiza's beauty.
As of this post there are roughly 3,000 photos of Luiza on Met Art and in every photo, any setting, any lighting, every pose....she is physically perfect from head to toe.

Yarina is a Met Art star, there's nothing more to say than she's just a knock out.
Saying that, she's not my favorite (or probably even in my top 10-15), but she is the kind of girl who captures the attention of every man in sight.

I'm with Doug on this one, I'd call this "normal" too.
We're just programmed to find a woman's anatomy attractive.
I don't really consider being attracted to any sexual/reproductive part of a woman's body a "fetish".

Cathleen, you are a gorgeous woman!!!
You are absolutely stunning from head to toe.....you have a beautiful face, pretty eyes, and fabulous body.
Many thanks to you and Arkisi for this perfect debut!!! Amazing woman!!!Incredible!!!
---------------------------

IMO Met Art has a new star....Cathleen is my #2 or #3 favorite model already. I hope to see much, much, much, much more from her. Excellent!!!

Rylsky, this set is a very good example of why I admire your work. I don't want to be critical of other photographers work, but your sets always bring out the best of Michelle H.
IMO, the 3 sets you shot of Michelle are light years ahead of the others.

When I look at this set the first thing I noticed is that she seemed to really enjoy working with you.
Everything looks natural, her poses, her expressions....just everything.

I've said many times before that I like a set to start off with a model fully clothed so I can see her as she appears in public (not necessarily outside when I say "public").

Michelle looks great....to me, this is her best set.
This set has everything I like to see.

Rylsky, this set is why I consider you the top photographer on Met Art.

This set is all over the place....what in the hell was Rylsky thinking???
Black and white photos, umbrella, high heels (two different pair), golden surface, water/shower, golden water drops....did I miss anything???Just kidding!!! I'm not sure there is anything I find more attractive than a "wet" beautiful woman.
INO, Rylsky's shower sets are among his best....and this one is another very nice set.

I rather like the golden water drops.....and I also like a few black and white photos mixed in a set too.

I understand what you are saying....and I agree with a good portion of it.
The only time I ever respond to a comment like the one you mentioned is simply to state that the model may read their post.
Why write a hurtful comment....what is the point?

There are many models I'm not a big fan of (some quite popular), but I realize everyone has a different opinion....so I don't comment on these models at all.

Egotistical is not a word that comes to my mind when reading any of your comments.....I agree that you don't give up easily when you want information (this is probably a habit you picked up back in your days as a prosecutor).....but this can also be a good quality to have.

What I appreciate most about Rylsky is his honesty.
He speaks his mind and respects those who do the same (as long as they are not crude or disrespectful).
I admire the way he goes to such lengths to protect his models privacy and security.

I personally enjoy learning about different cultures and Rylsky has taught me a few things here too.
I hope this forum has helped eliminate a few stereotypes we may have had about each other's country also.
-------------------------

What I like most about Yvonne is that she really seems to enjoy life. She's a beautiful woman with a great big smile and pretty blue eyes.

Image #64 is perfection, in my life I have never seen a more beautiful sight.
Luiza is not only my favorite model, but from the moment I saw Luiza in her first set (Met Model/Erotic Beauty set "Contempo"), I knew I was looking at one of the most beautiful women on earth.

Neil, yesterday I noticed a new set from Nelly was coming and I have been waiting to read your response (I know she's special to you).
Very nice comment you wrote and I hope Nelly gets a chance to read it.

I like that we each have a favorite (Luiza is mine....big surprise there, right?) and we get somewhat emotional when we see them.

I was speaking the truth when mentioned a week or so ago that I consider you a true gentleman because you are always courteous and respectful to both the model and photographer.

It's great that you have become such a huge supporter and friend of Catherine because she is quite special.
--------------------------------------

Rylsky, you are a very fortunate man to work with so many beautiful women.
Astrud is gorgeous. Everything about her is remarkable. Not only is she one of the most beautiful women I've seen, she has a pretty smile too....and she appears to be a very nice person also.

There are more of them than you probably realize. Of course the vast majority will not be in English (or even have English subtitles), but there are many films on the Golden Horde/Mongols which often include Volga Bulgars/Kipchak Khanate.

Thanks "K", I appreciate what you do. I like seeing a variety of photographers and their models as much as possible.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nice photography Catherine:)
Like others have already stated, it would be nice if Alana would show a smile now and then.
She is a pretty woman, but what she describes as "cold beauty" is not very flattering.
IMO, even if she doesn't like to smile, she could still show pleasant emotion through her eyes.
I hope Alana reads all of these comments, maybe then she would listen to you Catherine:)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As always, I want to thank you Catherine:)....and send my thanks to your team as well:))

I was a member on another site that featured many of the same models that Matiss does, but the photographer went by the name of Marsel. It's my guess that Marsel and Matiss are one in the same person.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I also question whether Dolce is the same person too.

Thanks Kilroy.
I have emailed "K" a few times in the past and I agree that her job is not an easy one since it is impossible to satisfy everyone.

My biggest complaint is that Catherine, Deltagamma, and a few other photographers (who are also quite popular) all must "fight it out" so to speak, for the few openings that remain after a couple photographers get there 20 or more sets published each month.

This makes it hard not only for the established Met Art photographers, but it makes it almost impossible for a new photographer to get his/her work published.

I emailed one photographer about a month ago concerning a new Met Art model who had 2 very popular sets published last year. I asked him if he had any more sets of this model and he told me that Met Art rejected all the new work he sent them of this model (so he sold them to someone else).
I have seen the sets Met Art rejected and they are every bit as nice (if not better than) the 2 sets that were highly rated last year (this model still is on Met Art's top model page).

Anyone who has read my comments is aware that I never complain and I am never critical of any model or photographer....it's just that I believe Met Art blatantly favors certain photographers, while many others seldom get their work/models published.

This is not an exact figure....but Met Art publishes 120+ sets each month and if 2 photographers have 40-50 of these sets each month, it doesn't leave a whole lot of room for all the other photographers to get their work/models published.

I assume (could be wrong of course) that rachsback feels Jeff may have offers to join a club that includes Caprice A, Katherine A, and a few other girls.....at least that what I make of his "It is what it is" comment.

I don't consider these "things" a flaw....I prefer to say it is what makes each girl unique.
Have you ever seen a photo of a symmetrical face (one displaying a mirror image of both sides)?....the person looks very odd....robot like, not human.

I personally find a "lazy" eyelid, quirky smile, etc. to often be the "feature" that makes a person really attractive.

I recently met a young woman who is attractive (but not overly beautiful/gorgeous) who I found to be extremely adorable....simply by the way she rolled her eyes and used facial expressions to show humor.....and I must admit, it made her the prettiest woman in the room. I kept returning to talk to her just to see her adorable mannerisms again and again.

About half of the first 40 or so photos didn't either make it to the editor, or were only partially edited (moles/tattoos/etc).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Other than that, overall a typical Cathleen set....but not as good as her first set.
She has a pretty face, a cute smile, and nice body.

I agree rachsback. I kind of hoped Magwich would chime in and explain his comment, but I do believe you are correct.

I think my response caused problems for Catherine too, I imagine the translation from English to Russian didn't work out very well.
I probably only served to make Catherine believe that Magwich's comment was a negative one....when he probably was, in sort of a backhanded way, praising Nastya.

Very nice Catherine and Nastya:)
Nastya looks great and the photography is excellent.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Starting with this set, I'd like to see Nastya's overall rating begin to climb back up into the top 30 (where she had been, until just recently, for a very long time).

I suspect we have another outdoor set of Erica because all 4 of her sets were shot by Matiss on the same day in nearby locations (in he first set the sea can be seen in the background).
It's my guess the area is also close to where many of Violla's sets were shot too.

IMO, Erica is one of the best models introduced by Met Art in 2013.
I actually like outdoor sets quite a bit (especially ones with a lot of color), but it would be nice to eventually see an indoor sets of Erica (where the sun isn't in her eyes requiring her to squint all the time).

Nice set Matiss!....but it would take a real screw up to make Erica look bad:)

I guess I should have prefaced my comment with "IMO" :))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is one reason I enjoy reading the comments daily (even if I don't join in)....it reminds me of how accurate the adage "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" actually is.

Neil, I know the problem is ME! It is spooky though how close (nearly identical) Susana's physical appearance is to the woman I dated.
I had a couple guys a went to school with who thought my girlfriend was hot....and I began to beg them to ask her out.

What complicated the issue was I really liked the girl's mother and married older sister (not sexually).
Her mother and sister were as sweet and kind as can be. The girl I dated was like her father (who happened to treat his wife like shit).
I will say though....she has a remarkable talent, she could strip completely out of her clothes within a few steps....and she didn't like to wear clothes when we were in private:)

I love this set....great work once again Arkisi!!! Nichole looks fabulous!
She's cute, humorous, sweet, beautiful, and gorgeous all in this set.
Nichole is definitely a top 10 model IMO....absolutely incredible!!!

I agree Sailor. Milagres has sort of flown under the RADAR to me....I've known of her, but I never really "looked" at her closely before this set.
She looks great! Beautiful face and smile....an extremely attractive woman.

I completely agree JB1718, Catherine's work is not featured nearly enough. She is consistently a top 5 photographer among members. I'd like to see as many sets from Catherine as we do Met Art's other top photographers.

Alex, I would hope you that realize many of these sets are months...even years...old when they are published.
I doubt very much anything you (or any of us) say (criticism or praise) has any bearing on Rylsky's (or any other photographer's) work.
The next set we see of Jeff Milton could be (and quite possibly is) actually shot prior to this set or any of her former sets.
The date a set is published has nothing to do with the timeline in which it was shot.

Many thanks to you also swplf2.
I want to thank you for your contribution in helping to make this a civil and enjoyable forum to participate in.
I especially enjoy reading both your and Sailor's comments. You guys crack me up:).....Sailor had me spitting a can of Coke across the room one day. Both you guys are something else:)

Happy New Year to you and all your loved ones.
I hope 2014 proves to be your best year yet.

Happy New Year to you and your loved ones!
I hope 2014 is the year all your dreams come true.
-------------

It's nice to read all the positive responses that this set of Leana is receiving.
Catherine is a perfectionist, she works so hard, she (and her team) puts everything into her work.
I hope 2014 is just the beginning of great things to come for her, both professionally and in her private life.
Catherine is a special woman.

Doug, I'm not sure what set you off today but something got under your skin.

There are a few who praise each and every girl and set, but if that's what they want to do (or how they actually feel), who I am to say they shouldn't?

I would imagine most of "us" don't sweat the details of a photo shoot the way you (and a couple others) probably do.
I don't care about pubic hair (whether the model has it or not). I don't look at finger nails, toes, dirty feet, how well pubic hair is (or isn't) trimmed, background/setting, etc.....and I venture to guess most others don't either.

Another possibility is that you only see praise from the vast majority of "commenters" because some (like myself) try to stay positive and don't post at all if they dislike a certain set, photographer, and/or model.
Sometimes it's what you don't say that shows how you feel.

The vast majority of the regular crowd gets along very well. They realize that many of the models read these comments and try to take this into account when they start a topic or post a response.
I believe this is why many regulars (including myself) don't like it much when a model is personally attacked.
Most of these girls are in their early to mid twenties, they're very young, and it just doesn't seem right to be critical of any young woman's appearance.
----------------------

On the topic of pubic hair....I'm afraid you're never going to be happy with the majority of the models on Met Art.
I don't know why the trend is to be clean shaven, it really doesn't matter anyway because it will continue until there's a cultural change.
I believe it's just a cycle and it will eventually return to the days when woman let their pubic hair grow.

I am not trying to be rude with anything I wrote....I try to be a realist.
I very much doubt there's anything you can say that's going to change the fact that 90% of the women on Met Art have a clean shaven (or very limited hair) mons pubis and vulva.

I hope you understand my point and don't take this as an attack on you.

swplf2, I think you "stirred" things up in a good way.
I completely understood that you were not an advocate of fewer photos (so there would be less repetition), or a greater number (so the viewer could select the ones they find most appealing), you simply offered both options.

I tend to agree with those who prefer more photos so any individual can choose the ones they like best.
I also don't mind "perceived" repetition, especially of facial images, because there is almost always some slight difference in the model's facial expression (which can totally change the entire mood of the photo).

All that really matters to me are photos in focus with good lighting and a beautiful woman. Everything else is just frosting on the cake.

swplf2, I wonder if those of "us" who enjoy Rylsky's commentary on this forum should send a message to Met Art as a show of support for him.
I'm sure you remember that your question on the latest Virginia Sun set stared a discussion where Rylsky mentioned he was informed to restrain from commenting on this forum.

It's complete B.S. that a few people can stop Rylsky from commenting. According to Rylsky the best way to state your opinion and address this issue is to contact Met Art.

If anyone wants to send a message to Met Art, the email address is;
comments@metart.com

Very nice, Rylsky brings us the pretty green eyed Night as a red head in this set....and she looks great.
Night has a fantastic figure, soft and feminine, yet toned and firm.

My favorite photo is image #5. This black and white, almost sepia colored, photo makes Night appear as if she is right out of the Late Teens/Early Twenties of 20th Century America.
I almost expect to see a REO, Stanley Steamer, or "Tin Lizzie" in the background.
I guess I've watch too many Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, and Harold Lloyd silent films lately.

manuel_du, I understand your question....and thank you for not being rude to rags25.

I appreciate rags25's comments because she is able to get in the models head and give me (us) an idea of what the model is thinking and why she may be posing in such a way in a photo.
She can explain why a model may be holding her hands against her inner thighs, or her breasts, etc....from a woman's perspective.

rags25, I do believe manuel_du was not trying to be rude.
I am quite sure I am not the only one who appreciates your descriptive comments.
After all, men and women think differently and it's nice that you educate us on how a woman thinks (and won't speak for all men, but I'm happy to have a woman give me advice and teach me a few lessons).

Nastya is one of Catherine's most popular models and she certainly is a beautiful young woman. I like how Catherine has photographed her in different settings, and in a few instances in unique themes too.

I like everything we've seen with Nastya, including the sets when she's paired with Susana C and Vanda B.
I hope the combination of Nastya and Catherine update "us" with new sets frequently for a long, long, time.

Image #84 is magnificent!!!....she's an absolutely gorgeous woman:):):)
Starting with Yarina's beautiful face, down to her perfect firm breasts, gazing upon her tight derriere, and finishing with her fabulous legs and feet (toes too Sailor:)....the image of supreme feminine beauty.

I'm not really a breast man, but Zhanet's breasts are fabulous. I've always thought that she had one of the better bodies on Met Art.
I think Zhanet's body compares really well with Ilze's....both extremely beautiful women with incredible legs and very nice derrieres.

I guess the "wet hair" thing is the closest "thing" I have to a fetish.

It's a long story, but it boils down to a beautiful girl that I met a few days earlier asked me to come over to her apartment the weekend before I was to leave the country. She just got home from work when I met her there and she decided to take a shower. When she stepped out of the shower she came into her kitchen and sat in my lap, wearing nothing but a bathrobe, she sat there and ran a brush through her long dripping wet hair. It's a night I will never forget.

A woman has the right to do what she wants to with her body, but I think the term "tramp stamp" fits perfectly....I too dislike (bordering on hate) tattoos. I have yet to see one improve the looks of a woman.

fer_realz, I completely understand your response (and I agree with you). I guess what I did was compare his comment to the one by gswkJu "The seller", and the "The seller" is an ass. He tries to stir up trouble.....uuusssee is just opinionated (which I have no problem with) and doesn't always frame his response/opinion in detail.
gswkJu's comment was not only rude, but disrespectful, confrontational, and degrading.
I take issue with this because Catherine is always kind and thoughtful to everyone. Catherine will answer any question and even try to satisfy the desires of her followers.
She never backs away from criticism (often she hardest on herself).
You and I (along with a few others) are lucky to have Catherine as a friend too....and I don't like anyone being disrespectful to a friend (especially Catherine).

Come on guys.....uuusssee stated his opinion (it could be considered rude, but not offensive).....so cut him some slack.

The only comments I don't care much for are the ones that criticize a models appearance or a photographers talent.
-----------------------

I wasn't going to comment on this set at all because I am turned off by all of Susana's sets.....not because I don't think she is a beautiful woman....but because I dated a woman who could pass for her twin sister. This girl (the one I dated) was the meanest, nastiest, most self centered person I ever came to know. I couldn't get away from her fast enough.

Sailor, look at image #68 in this set and then go back and watch her first video. When she exits the shower it is easy to see that her moles match. She has a large one next to her neck on the left side, and a smaller one above her right breast (others match too).

This is definitely the correct girl....Divina A.

I agree she looks like a different person in this make up.
---------------------

But....it's a shame that ratings can be skewed by members who give a "10" to their favorite, but vote a "1 or 2" for any model that is in competition with their favorite.
--------------------------

This is an example why this system doesn't work fairly;

As I write this comment Jeff Milton is #7. If a member likes Jeff Milton better than Flavia A (currently #6) or Lily C (currently #5) then they could give Jeff Milton a "10" but Flavia A and Lily C a "1" simply to help Jeff Milton move up in popularity.

The current system is too easy to manipulate.
---------------------------

It would be a fairer system if a models popularity was based upon how many "added as a favorite" votes they receive.
This way only positive votes would matter.

The rating system means nothing....too easily rigged and abused:(
--------------

As I told Rylsky earlier, I will not give any model less than a 9.....if she's not a 9 or 10 to me, I just don't vote for her at all.
I don't want to "down grade" a model that might be another members favorite.

Astrud, my favorite Rylsky model:) Astrud is a magnificent woman, an exceptional beauty.
She's incredibly beautiful from head to toe, and IMHO she has the prettiest smile of all the Met Art models too.

Now about the "wet set".....I love it, great job Rylsky!!!

Nothing compares to the sight and smell of a beautiful woman as she steps out of the shower with freshly washed hair.
Her skin soft and smooth, with the aroma from her hair as that of fresh cut flowers, MMMMMMMMMMMM

Respectful is stating one's opinion without name calling and/or being rude to another human being.

Telling the truth (which is almost always an opinion, not "truth", since "truth" is in the eye of the beholder), doesn't require name calling or demeaning comments.

An example that was posted not too long ago by a member went something like this...."she's fat and ugly".
The models might, and often do, read these comments....so why in the hell would anyone make a statement such as my example???

That is a rude, obnoxious, and disrespectful comment and the type I am speaking of.

I understand your criticism and I see some validity in it, but I also can see why this setting was chosen.

The step, bed, and sofa offer several areas for Flavia to sit, lie down, and pose so that she doesn't appear "unnatural" (or isn't in some weird, contorted, twisted, or odd looking shape that some photographers shoot).

This is only my opinion....if the model is beautiful (Flavia definitely fits this category), the model is in focus, and her skin and lighting looks natural.....the background usually doesn't matter to me (my complete attention is on the model).

Luiza, in image #60 you are gorgeous (as always), and in image #61 your smile is the most beautiful sight I have ever seen.
If I saw you in person I would be stunned....unable to say a single word.
I would be speechless when confronted by your outstanding beauty.

I want to thank you Luiza, and Catherine also, for allowing me to see such physical beauty. You are extraordinary Luiza!

Thank you for explaining the process a little better (to an idiot like me:), I know nothing about photography.
My apologies if I appeared to be rude when asking this question, I didn't understand why I saw this man.

I am an artist too (designer/drawings/sketches), so I have a pretty good eye for detail (I guess this is why I noticed the man in the reflection).
------------------------------------------
I can see that you try to make everyone happy, but that is impossible.
I am happy to see that you are defending yourself much better when people are rude, and remember, you also have many admirers who are there to help too.

Are you always so sweet?:)
I really like your photography and the models you work with.

I understand that the models often read these comments, so I want to make sure I don't offend Susana because she surely is a beautiful woman....but,
I have a hard time looking at Susana because I dated a woman who looks so much like Susana, that she could have been her identical twin (and it didn't end well).

Thank you for bringing so many beautiful woman to us through your photography, and thank you for your kindness.

I agree with hipshot....nothing at all to be embarrassed by.
I think as long as we realize that we will never meet any of these women we're doing alright. There's nothing wrong with admiring a woman's beauty.

The scary ones are those who believe they are in love with one of these women and somehow get it in their heads that they'll track her down and meet her in person (as if she's just waiting to be swept off her feet by them).

fer_realz,
I too envy the photographers who see beautiful women such as Lukki on a daily basis for they are true martyrs....think of the pain and suffering they must endure to bring "us" these women:)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A career with fringe benefits???.....then again who knows???
Many photographers who seem to be men are actually women....and vice versa....
and it's also possible a few male photographers aren't "into" women at all (if you know what I mean).

I hope Gabriel does not retire, she is one of my top models. Catherine, the next time you speak with Gabriel please tell her that she is an amazing beauty.....you must find a way to convince her of this!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Some people admire many women, but do not necessarily have a favorite.
A few of us admire only one or two women, but we admire these one or two women very, very, very, very much!!!

So, the current rating system tells which models are most popular, but it does not tell how deeply any certain member admires a particular model.