It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info

Did anyone else notice the anchor mentioning the "weakening" of the structure during his conversation with Brandy? It was imperative that the soundbites were introduced well in advance of the "official" investigations.

Oh and what happened to Brandy's Mama's cough. Sounds like she recovered really quickly!!

How does the caller Brandy Orange claim the smoke is blowing into her terrace when she is in Brooklyn [south-east of Manhattan] and the smoke is blowing south-westwards?...cough...cough...I've just seen my missus light up a ciggie outside...

I am sure you realize that if, as you say,"that's how it was given to us" (the WNYW FOX5 9/11 footage), the question is: WHY did FOX's Dennis Swanson give you a truncated / blanked out version of their very own 9/11 footage? What exactly is going on here? And what does this say about your 9/11 TV archives credibility?

Thanks for a kind reply.Simon Shack

So you may ask: WHY did FOX's Dennis Swanson even bother to turn up at the 9/11 archives (as late as August 2011!) to give them a truncated version of their horrendous/blooper-packed WNYW broadcasts? Please keep in mind that Swanson's official morning footage goes blank after only 15 minutes - yet it includes the infamous NOSE-OUT shot. Now, you may remember that one of my points in September Clues was that no plane was visible in the wide shot, just before the three zoom-in motions preceding the NOSE-OUT disaster. You may also recall that Anthony Lawson (maker of "September Clues Busted") later came up with a never-seen-before-version of the wide shot in which a tiny blob ("Flight 175", no doubt! ) was visible. Well, this blob (which is TOTALLY ABSENT in all of the four clips I've collected over the years of the NOSE-OUT sequence), is now also visible in the official "Dennis Swanson version" recently uploaded on the TV archives...

If you take the time to compare the Archive version with my version - you will see that this can hardly be a matter of video resolution. The small fly-by choppers, for instance, are perfectly visible on my version. So have WNYWFOX5 gone to all this trouble - finally making public (some) of their 9/11 footage - only to insert "Flight175" into that wide shot? I don't know. What I do know, is that some dude has been bombarding me with a string of e-mails lately, urging me to look up that blob on the TV archives - and insisting that I should address the issue...

Simon, I'm finding it very difficult to perfectly line up the frames of your version and the 9/11 version of the nose-out shots. Do you have any difficulty doing this with the other versions available to you? Are we looking at a re-render with slightly different frames? Especially check the fade in after the fade to black that interrupts the nose-out.

Good luck with your comparison. What follows is the best I could come up with. I apologize in advance if things don't quite line up. The clip you linked to (and others available on the web) have a black border even though the overall resolution is the same as the archive footage. In practice that means the image portion of the frames has a lower resolution than the archive footage.

There are some differences between the two sets of video that could be attributed to differences in resolution as illustrated below. The 9/11 archive footage is of a considerably higher resolution so objects in the distance appear to have greater detail, or in the case of the helicopter image, appear clearer for longer. At the same time, the first frame of the fade following the fade to black appears to differ between the version you've linked to and the archive footage and I'm not sure what could account for that other than a re-render of the footage. Does anyone else have any theories?

Oh I had a closer look at the "footage". And I kept my eyes on the chopper. On the last zoom in, the chopper magically disappears. If it would be farer away, then it should fade out, but it just vanished suddenly. And then keep your eyes on the antenna, which starts to shrink.... what software did they use for shot?

Oh and compare the text from the "high res" footage to the "low res" footage. It does not match pixel exact (the text is not the same size!). So this has to be rendered independent from each others! So this is not 100% the same footage, it's made separately from the other.