Amazon has sued 1114 John Doe defendants who are offering to write fake reviews via Fiverr, the site that allows you to purchase services for as low as $5.

The Fiverr sellers offered to write fake, positive product reviews for sellers and manufacturers, clearly tainting what is usually a pretty honest system.

"While small in number, these reviews can significantly undermine the trust that consumers and the vast majority of sellers and manufacturers place in Amazon, which in turn tarnishes Amazon's brand," said Amazon's complaint. The lawsuit only names the defendants by their Fiverr names, with the hope of being able to sue them by their legal names soon.

Amazon's own investigators emailed with the Fiverr users and found that some were willing to use multiple accounts, multiple addresses and different IP addresses to try to avoid detection by Amazon. Others were willing to receive an empty envelope from the seller so they could show up as "Verified Buyer" and also have a shipping record.

"Defendants are misleading Amazon's customers and tarnishing Amazon's brand for their own profit and the profit of a handful of dishonest sellers and manufacturers," added Amazon. "Amazon is bringing this action to protect its customers from this misconduct, by stopping defendants and uprooting the ecosystem in which they participate."

Fiverr is not named in the suit, and the two companies are working together to remove the listings and avoid such scams in the future.

It's simple: ignore all five and one-star reviews. Five-star reviews have a high probability of having been paid for, and one-star reviews are likely vindictive or vengeful, and don't represent the product adequately. The truth lies in the two to four-star reviews.

In reality, only about 1% of all products are five-star products and one-star products. Yet, according to Amazon reviews, about half of everything is worthy of five stars. If McDonald's sold on Amazon it'd be a five-star restaurant. Really.

When laws allow unlimited ownership of ideas, it is to a society as iron fusion is to the core of a star.

When verified realities lead us to anger, we must learn to reevaluate our beliefs.

Originally posted by Clam_Up: It's simple: ignore all five and one-star reviews. Five-star reviews have a high probability of having been paid for, and one-star reviews are likely vindictive or vengeful, and don't represent the product adequately. The truth lies in the two to four-star reviews.

In reality, only about 1% of all products are five-star products and one-star products. Yet, according to Amazon reviews, about half of everything is worthy of five stars. If McDonald's sold on Amazon it'd be a five-star restaurant. Really.

This is by far the most head-up-your-ass comment I've ever heard!

This is living according to the 'median' and that's tantamount to having blinders on.

Since you've started off with an insult, it's likely you'll be subject to confirmation bias at this point and most of this will go over your head, but that's your problem. Anyway...

I'm not talking about only buying products that have four or two star reviews. I'm talking about the weight given to descriptive texts that provide information that help decide what the product is worth.

Star-wise, sure. It'd be dumb to only buy four, three or two-star products, but the information in the four to two-star reviews tends to be more reliable because it's more likely to avoid biases. I'm not saying all five and one-star reviews are useless, but they are more likely to carry deception. Ten reviews can be, and often are, undermined by a single well-written deceptive review.

How many professional reviewers give 100% and zero percent scores for things they review? Think about that, and then realize that the vast majority of reviews on Amazon award those scores.

Really, Amazon could do with a thumbs-up or thumbs-down system and most average consumers probably wouldn't notice.

You're looking at a product with over 1,000 reviews and you want the truth. At 1,000, the likelihood that at least a marginal percentage of them are paid-for and/or placed by company employees is quite high. And at the one-star point, It's very likely that a competing company will place fraudulent reviews. I'd prefer not to be influenced by such deceptive tactics and, really, sight-unseen, there's little to help detect it.

If a company is going to pay to have reviews made up, it's very unlikely that they'll want four star reviews. They'll want those five star reviews. If I'm going to sabotage a competitor's reviews, I'm going right for the one-star level.

Four star, three star and two star reviews generally carry more in-depth information than five and one-star reviews because people that write them "get it." The one-star reviews in most cases are not well thought out and are knee-jerk reactions to failure.

After all that, I probably wouldn't buy a product that didn't get at least four and a half stars.

TL;DR

Median: Average.

So, yeah, it's median, but it also helps avoids biases and deception. Your response is about as well thought out as those one-star reviews. If you have well thought out ideas, I'm all ears, but please keep nonsense to yourself.

This message has been edited since its posting. Latest edit was made on 19 Oct 2015 @ 10:23

When laws allow unlimited ownership of ideas, it is to a society as iron fusion is to the core of a star.

When verified realities lead us to anger, we must learn to reevaluate our beliefs.