The purpose of my email is to discuss a miscarriage of justice over which you have direct control.

Mr. Hickey’s motion to have public access to the cross-examination of Mr. Allan Rock over his use of student tuition money was in the public interest and it is not something over which a student should be punished.

In addition, your counsel’s move to punish Mr. Hickey with court costs sends the wrong message to students who want to get involved in University governance. In my respectful opinion, your move to charge Mr. Hickey for his intervention would limit students and the public in exercising their agency in the court system, the university, and society at large.

I find your decision to pursue a student for an amount equal to one third of his annual salary in this matter to be very disturbing, especially in light of your vocation as a Professor of Social Justice.

This matter is urgent. Will you abandon your charges of $3876.95 to Mr. Hickey for his Motion to Intervene heard on March 28?

Professor St. Lewis, would you go after me if it were I making this intervention?

These people seem to have let power get to their heads and theeir appalling conduct vis a vis Prof Rancourt and now this student rep indicates they are not fit for the positions they occupy. May they soonbe removed ! Or their conscince taurn on the and make them sicken and wither in their pontificating hypocritical chairs.