The Quebec riots might be more meaningful if they were a manifestation of a larger and more significant cause. While there’s no doubt a fairly high amount of shared DNA, the two movements are conceptually quite different, Michael Moore’s support notwithstanding. The OWS movement is big picture, aimed at the state of privilege of the “1%” over the “99%. It succeeded in inspiring millions but has been deemed ineffective because it avoided specific goals and shunned leadership. The Quebec students are about narrow self-entitlement. Militant leaders press for the very specific goal of preventing trivial hikes in personal tuition costs that are ludicrously low. If this movement more broadly contested a post-secondary public education system in Quebec that is sub-standard in world terms, they would make more sense, but they would have to acknowledge that under-financing is a big part of the problem. Simply claiming that education should be free because Quebec is “different,” is to show off how parochial a bubble they inhabit.

About

OpenCanada is a digital publication sitting at the intersection of public policy, scholarship and journalism. We produce multimedia content to explain, analyze and tell stories about the increasingly complex and rapidly shifting world of foreign policy and international affairs.