Finally, I know that you’ve already looked at the DDT Rating, so you already know

the conclusion: this is the single best one volume Greek-English Lexicon available

anywhere at any price. Now, let us commence with the review!

Introductory Comments

Lexicography is old. The first known Greek lexicon of the New Testament can be dated
back to 1522. For the next 400 years, the major changes that were made to Greek lexicons
of the NT were 1) how word order was treated; 2) including more and more Greek vocabulary
words; and 3) Latin was eventually rejected in favor of English for English speaking
peoples. (Duh.)

In the late 1800's, the science of New Testament textual criticism bloomed, and dozens
of new manuscripts were brought to light. (NOTE: the actual number of additional
manuscripts is much higher, but the way critics count manuscripts is odd; 100 manuscripts
that are substantially identical only count as 1.) None of the existing lexicons
were working much in the area of these additional Greek manuscripts. That changed
with Erwin Preuschen’s Greek-German Lexicon of 1910. It not only forayed into the
papyri, it was the first Greek Lexicon to utilize quotations from the Apostolic Fathers.
Preuschen died ten years later, and a man named Walter Bauer was chosen to continue
his work. It is Preuschen’s Greek-German Lexicon that became the BDAG that we know
today.

The second edition (Bauer’s first - still in German) was published in 1928 with major
changes; it was practically an original work. It received academic accolades as “Best
of Class”. The third edition was published in 1937 - and now “Bauer” was the only
name on the title. It has since been known as Bauer’s work - even now in it’s sixth
German edition (and after Bauer was dead!) with Kurt and Barbara Aland as editors.

When Bauer released his fourth German edition in 1952, William F. Arndt and F. Wilbur
Gingrich were chosen to make an English version. BAG (Bauer-Arndt-Gingrich) was published
in 1957, not as a translation, but an adaptation.

Arndt died in 1957, and Frederick William Danker (a student of Arndt’s) was chosen
to take his place. A second English edition was published in 1979, referred to as
BAGD. Danker became lead editor for the most current third edition, now referred
to as BDAG.

BDAG includes references to the latest extra-Biblical research; has had most errata
from previous editions now corrected; and includes a pleasant new type face for ease
of use. The largest area of updating, though, has to do with definition. All lexicons
provide a gloss (one word equivalent definition for translation) or multiple glosses.
BDAG has expanded greatly the extended definitions for better exegetical accuracy.

Traditionally, lexicons have shown a preference for definition of a word in the source
language with a corresponding word or phrase in the receptor language. A series of
words or glosses is then offered to cover a variety of possibilities for translation.
But these alleged meanings are for the most part mere formal equivalents, and in
the case of words that occur very frequently in a language they run the hazard of
being devoid of semantic value. Even worse, an unwary reader may think that a given
word bears all the content expressed by a series of synonyms. Not to speak of the
student whose primary language is not English and who therefore may not understand
distinctions between the English synonyms that supposedly define a given Greek term.
In an effort to overcome this problem, this revision builds on and expands Bauer’s
use of extended definition. This approach permits readers to explore the semantic
structures of their own native language for adequate interpretation without the need
of first deciphering the meaning of various glosses or synonyms.

Theological Bias

I’m wary of German works. They are infamous for their liberalism. I am pleased to
report that Danker writes as a conservative Lutheran, commissioned by conservative
Lutherans. His extended definition for the word “virgin” is quite telling (and pleasing):

one who has never engaged in sexual intercourse, virgin, chaste person....

If you’ve ever read anything about the Greek or Hebrew root words for “virgin” and
their usage in Is 7 and Matt 1, you’ll quickly understand - and appreciate - Danker’s
conservatism.

Academic Target

While BDAG is intellectually accessible by those “less than professional” in their
study of the Greek New Testament, it’s price alone indicates it’s Academic Target:
Professional Greek Students. It is the standard lexicon in the university setting
- for the professor and the student. It is not written, though, to that level. It
can be understood and well utilized by those on the pastoral and even pre-pastoral
level (like a serious Sunday School teacher). I’ve graded the “Academic Target” to
“Pastoral-Theologian” on the DDT scale, taking into account it’s price and usability.

Language Skills Needed

If there were a Strong’s numbering system, this lexicon would be usable by those
who do not know Greek; the actual entries themselves are understandable without a
knowledge of Greek. However; finding the word entries will require a knowledge of
Greek since there is no numbering system. (In other words: for those completely unfamiliar
with the Greek language, this tool will probably be a waste of time and resources.)

Entries

Length

The articles are long enough to explain the usage of the word. And - because nearly
every word (8,095 of them!) includes an exhaustive treatment, you’ll almost always
be able to find the word’s usage in the specific text you’re studying. This is key.
If a word has fifteen different glosses, but no identification as to which gloss
is the correct one, what’s the point? BDAG almost always (and with all of the important
words) shows every reference with every gloss. (Just how I would have done it, by
the way!)

Formatting

One of the major plusses to the BDAG edition (over the first “BAG” and second “BAGD”)
is it’s formatting. BDAG is very much easier to read than BAG and BAGD.

Conclusion

My Conclusion

My conclusion is rather simple: this is the industry standard, and it’s not been
granted this status just because of it’s name. It really is the best Greek lexicon
available at any price.

Your Conclusion

Now comes the really important conclusion: do you really need BDAG? Ask and answer
these questions:

1. Are you a professional biblical languages student? If the answer is “yes,” then
this is a no-brainer. Bite the bullet and buy the text.

2. Do you own a first or second edition? If you already own the first or (especially)
the second edition, the updated information in the third edition may not warrant
enough of a change to purchase the upgrade - even if you’re a professional student
of the Greek text. Formatting and errata corrections may be enough; but the actual
content is probably not - unless you’re the guy who must keep up with the absolute
latest in linguistics. If you’re not a Greek teacher and own a BAG or a BAGD, you
probably pass on BDAG - or ask for it as a Christmas gift.

3. How often do you perform detailed word studies on one word? For anyone not a professional
student, this is a key question. There are inferior products available that can cheaply
replace BDAG for the vast majority of people. If you enjoy (or just need to do) hours
of Greek word study, then BDAG is certainly a useful tool. If not, then look for
an alternative (Vine’s word studies, Strong’s Concordance and Greek dictionary, &
Thayers Greek Lexicon would be very inexpensive alternatives). Obviously the inexpensive
alternatives are, well, cheap; but for most people, a $165+ Greek lexicon probably
isn’t a necessity.

4. Can you exegetically survive with inexpensive alternatives? For most of us, the
answer is “yes.”

5. Do you really need the updated information from extra-Biblical literature in the
upgrade from BAGD(2) to BDAG(3)? As far as actual intellectual material goes for
the entries in BDAG, very little will have changed about the NT usages of these words.
The biggest area of differences intellectually will be seen in the “extra-Biblical”
literature. So -do you really need to know the additional information about the
Septuagint and Early Church Fathers? If the answer is “no,” then move on to an inexpensive
alternative.

Part of the attraction to BDAG is academic “snob appeal.” The world of academia is
incredibly snobbish (“What? You’re only using BAGD? My research is superior to yours!”
- and if you don’t think that attitude exists, you’ve never been on campus). Like
a polo player on a shirt or a swoosh on a hat, BDAG is a statement title. OK, I get
it that the cotton under the polo player is a comfortable cotton; but is it worth
5x$ of the store brand? That will be up to the individual user.

Other Reviews

Amazon currently (October, 2011) has 46 reviews, and they can be read here. The average
Amazon rating was 4.8/5 stars.

Google Books currently (October, 2011) has 13 reviews of BDAG, and they can be read
here. The average rating was 4.5/5 stars.

BDAG is the Academic Standard for Greek Lexicons. No matter the denomination, professional
students will be required to purchase this work. Its exhaustive use of nearly every
word’s NT reference makes it “King of Greek Lexicons.” If you want to study like
the pros, this is your lexicon.