I don't understand why people take Brian's analysis as gospel. He's done a lot of analysis and had been doing it long enough to warrant some credibility, but I don't think you should discard everything that other people write in favor of Brian's analysis. Other people understand football and can do analysis as well. Other viewpoints than Brian's are worth considering. Perhaps you should consider this before trashing other people's work without offering any useful commentary.

Usually, Maize is the go-to for fans because it is much more noticeable than blue. I'm not sure if anyone is coordinating any colors for the game.

Also, blue is a Florida color, so anyone wearing blue on either side will tend to blend in a bit in the crowd. But at the end of the day, it really doesn't matter, so get whatever you think he will like.

This guy clearly doesn't know how probability works. Even if you are conservative, the odds of Michigan going undefeated are closer to 1 in 200 if you work it out according to likelihood of winning each game.

I'm not sure what your point is. Better QB = better team? Duh. We have who wr have and if Speight is the best guy for the job on the roster then that's who will start. There's no point in pining for another QB. The best guy will play.

I'm not saying he's perfect by any means - he's no Sam Darnold. My point is that he was solid overall, and that we should expect improvement over last year.

Do I wish we had a Heisman candidate QB? Sure, but we don't so the point is moot. He plays well enough for us to compete for the league championship, so I guess we'll have to "settle" for a QB who is only far above average in the conference.

Really not understanding the consternation some here have regarding Speight. He was overall a solid QB last year before he broke his collarbone, and even then showed flashes of brilliance afterward against a couple of great defenses.

He was statistically one of the top QBs in the B1G last year and will only improve from there. If his WR corps is dependable I think he will have a very solid year, probably top 3 passing in the conference.

Draftageddon is interesting for maybe the first couple installments. And it's a great way to get a rundown of the best players in the conference. However, once we get to the point where we're deciding between PSU's third best receiver vs an OSU 2nd string DL, that's when things get pretty uninteresting pretty quick.

I think you answered your own question with 'a year after a trip to the CFP.' Dantonio is the best coach in MSU's history. They'd be nuts for firing him after one down year. This year doesn't look like it'll be any better, though.

Your version of the universe doesn't match mine, apparently. Trump admitted on national TV he fired Comey because of the Flynn investigation.

Also, Comey told the President a while back that he was not under investiation, but that doesn't make it the case when he was fired and it doesn't mean that the President's campaign was not under investigation (which it was and is). Which pretty much means that Trump himself was under investigation, at that point it's just semantics.

Some people may laugh, but Edge (the new Microsoft browser) is not terrible. It is not as fully featured as Chrome or Firefox, but it uses a LOT less resources and therefore less battery on your laptop/tablet/whatever.