A new picture emerged Thursday of what really happened the night the Navy SEALs swooped in on Osama bin Laden's compound in Pakistan. CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports the 40 minutes it took to kill bin Laden and scoop his archives into garbage bags were all recorded by tiny helmet cameras worn by each of the 25 SEALs. Officials reviewing those videos are still reconstructing a more accurate version of what happened. We now know that the only firefight took place in the guest house, where one of bin Laden's couriers opened fire and was quickly gunned down. No one in the main building got off a shot or was even armed, although there were weapons nearby.

All this not getting the story straight, and combined with not releasing the photos is going to make for a lot of grist for the conspiracy theorists in the Middle East.

To add to the confusion, Senator Inhofe today described the photos as showing an entrance wound at the left eye and an exit wound at the right ear, or the other way around, with the brains hanging out of his face.

So now they will say he was shot in the back and from behind (which is fine with me, but it's still, unfortunately, fodder for the nuts).

This whole thing has been a sham and a scheme from the start. The shot in the situation room with BO skulking in the corner, do any of us believe they are staring at the wall? Nope, they are watching OBL get what he had coming to him. And it bugs them a lot.

Go read the comments at the CBS site, some people are agonizing that we didn’t practice Love Not War.

I want to drive OBLs wives and children before me, hear their lamentations, and then give them the opportunity to jump off the 110th floor of a tall building on fire. F-’em.

29
posted on 05/12/2011 6:28:00 PM PDT
by West Texas Chuck
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. That should be a convenience store, not a Government Agency.)

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 25% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Thirty-seven percent (37%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -12 (see trends).

Forty-eight percent (48%) give the president good or excellent marks for his handling of national security issues. Thats up from 39% before bin Laden was killed but down from 53% in the immediate aftermath of that event. Just 34% give Obama positive reviews on handling the economy while 45% say he is doing a poor job in that area. Other measures of the presidents performance are available for Platinum Members on the By the Numbers page.

Forty-three percent (43%) of voters nationwide consider themselves fiscal conservatives and 36% are social conservatives. Twenty-nine percent (29%) consider themselves conservative on both fiscal and social policy issues. Ten percent (10%) are liberal on both sets of issues.

Sixty-five percent (65%) would like the U.S. to stay out of the way as the unrest in Syria unfolds. Those numbers are similar to results prior to the U.S. involvement in Libya.

Looking back, just 25% of voters think the federal bailouts of banks, auto companies and insurance companies were good for the United States.

The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve. It is updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). Updates are also available on Twitter and Facebook

Twenty-nine percent (29%) believe that the United States is generally heading in the right direction. The president leads a generic Republican 45% to 43% in an early look at Election 2012. Republicans hold a three-point advantage on the Generic Congressional Ballot.”

30
posted on 05/12/2011 6:28:34 PM PDT
by LibLieSlayer
(THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!)

Obama sycophants in the media, which means most of the media, have been trumpeting an Associated Press poll that purports a 60% approval rating for Barack Obama. And if you believe that number, I have a compound in Abbottabad I'd like to sell you.

The AP reached the 60% figure by lumping the majority of 'Undecideds' into the Obama approval column.

Not the AP poll. If folks said they were undecided, the AP poll asked them which way they would lean. So, the AP's approval numbers include people who -- after flipping a coin, or channeling their dog Spot, or whatever -- said they would lean toward Approve.

Incredibly, though, the AP poll also added even those who remained undecided after that second question into the Approval column.

11% of respondents told AP pollsters originally that they had no opinion on the Obama Approve/Disapprove question. After being pressed -- it's entirely likely that some folks gave the answer they thought would be politically correct -- 6% said they would lean favorable. Add those who still were undecided even after the follow-up question, and... Voila. Obama's approval number jumps from 55% to 60%.

(Note: The vagaries of rounding will sometimes lead to slightly more, or slightly less, than 100% when totaling the poll's rounded guesses--, uh, results.)

The Associated Press further spun the results in how it reported the poll.

Here's the AP lede:

"President Barack Obama's approval rating has hit its highest point in two years - 60 percent -"

Let's look at the actual numbers. Only 1 in 3 people (32%) surveyed said they strongly approve of Obama's job performance. Up from his recent figures, but well below numbers earlier in his term. 23% said they somewhat approve of Obama's performance. Again, that's 55% approval, not 60%. And, as has been pointed out by Jim Geraghty at National Review and elsewhere, the poll was weighted to Democrat respondents by a 17% margin.

The Associated Press also spun the poll's internals. They reported:

"Comfortable majorities of the public now call Obama a strong leader who will keep America safe."

What the AP did not report:

Only 38% of the respondents said the phrase, "He is a strong leader," describes Obama very well. The poll categorizes this sort of question into incremental categories. 62% told pollsters that the description fit Obama either not well at all, slightly well, or only somewhat well.

The AP reported:

"Nearly three-fourths - 73 percent - also now say they are confident that Obama can effectively handle terrorist threats."

What the AP did not report:

Their poll shows that, again, 38% say they are very confident in the Big O on the issue. The majority of respondents, 51%, say they are not confident at all, not too confident, or only somewhat confident.

The AP reported:

"Sixty-nine percent say Obama will keep America safe."

What the AP did not report:

It's still just that same stubborn 38% who told pollsters that the phrase "he will keep the country safe" described Obama very well. And Republicans retained a narrow 43-32% lead over Democrats on which party would more likely keep the nation safe.

The AP reported:

"52 percent also now like how he's (Obama's) handling the nation's stubbornly high 9 percent unemployment."

What the AP did not report:

Their actual numbers show that less than half, 49%, either strongly approve or somewhat approve on the issue. They reach the 52% number after asking Undecideds which way they lean, adding 3%. At least on this question, though, they did not include the remaining Undecideds (1%) in the Obama column.

Even the AP admitted there were troubling results in their poll for Obama, pointing out that the Right Track/Wrong Track numbers show a majority of people think the country is headed in the wrong direction by a 52/45% margin.

The AP does not point out, however, that an even bigger majority, 59%, said that Obama is only an average or below average president. Only 43% said they either strongly approve or somewhat approve of the way he is handling the budget deficit. On immigration, the figure was 47%; on taxes 45%. And on rising gas prices, even the AP could only put those approval figures at just 31%.

Why come out with such a distorted poll now, and why has the media played it up? The Associated Press story admitted that Obama's post-Osama bump in the polls:

"... comes at an important time. He is embarking on his re-election campaign and is in the early days of a debate with Republicans who control the House over raising the country's debt limit. But it's unclear how long Obama's strengthened standing will last in the aftermath of bin Laden's death."

What is clear is that the media has also embarked on their 2012 campaign for Obama as well.

“Why didn’t bin Laden protect his files? The best guess is he thought the United States would never find him.”

Simple logic , a$$wad,the man killed was a surgically altered stand in martyr, and when that fact was discovered aboard the Vinson , the body was deep sixed even before it was cold, Victory was declared, and the so called intel captured is disinformation. Taqiyya. You gotta love it.

And now we have his game in the press, and the whole thing has become a part of the Obama campaign.

I would like to know why they are releasing information about the intel they gathered. I would think they wouldn’t want the operational agents of AQ to know we know their identities or plans so we could capture them and disrupt their operations. Now they will dig up new operatives and construct alternate plans.....IDIOTS!

33
posted on 05/12/2011 6:43:18 PM PDT
by joesjane
((The strength of the pack is the wolf - Rudyard Kipling))

“photos as showing an entrance wound at the left eye and an exit wound at the right ear, or the other way around, with the brains hanging out of his face.
So now they will say he was shot in the back and from behind...,”

When a closed container like a can or a skull is penetrated with a high velocity bullet, the contents jet out the entrance hole before the exit hole is even formed.

We have been debating this since 1963 and the physics and anatomy is well established.

“photos as showing an entrance wound at the left eye and an exit wound at the right ear, or the other way around, with the brains hanging out of his face.
So now they will say he was shot in the back and from behind...,”

When a closed container like a can or a skull is penetrated with a high velocity bullet, the contents jet out the entrance hole before the exit hole is even formed.

We have been debating this since 1963 and the physics and anatomy are well established.

They knew OBL was there for a long time. Why did they decide to go that night? The night of the Royal Wedding where Obama was snubbed. Where Obama’s ratings were tanking because of high gas and high unemployment. It also happened to be right after Trump had been bashing Obama not only on the birth certificate.... Which Obama came out with (prover fake by the way) and of course the War on Terror and Obama not capturing Osama Bin Laden. Then all of a sudden it happened.

This story has changed numerous times. Which reminds me of something I learned as a kid. If someone keeps changing their story, then they are not telling you the truth.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.