I note in passing that the Proposed WG Decision dated 14 April has the consequence that the IRi associated with a graph in SPARQL cannot be used inside an RDF triple to reliably refer to the graph. This means in particular that uses such as those contemplated in
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/RDF-Datasets-Proposal, which use the SPARQL name as the object in an 'imports' triple, are ruled out by this decision.
Pat
On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:29 AM, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
> ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/30
>
> Raised by:
> On product:
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes