This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our world. Watch and become AWARE!
3.5 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.

Saturday, August 31, 2013

Guys- I've been on the phone all day and everything I'm hearing squares
directly with what Tony & Loechin said today. But that's not what I want to
talk about tonight. I had a PM today with a special person who's on the verge
of losing everything. The house, the car, the furniture...everything. She was
losing hope.

I reminded her that sometimes God tests us to strengthen our faith. That said,
God promises to take care of his people and I told her not to worry. She either
hangs-on by the skin of her teeth and pays everything off post RV, or she buys
everything new. I asked her if she planned to buy a new house anyway after the
RV. She said "Yea, our dream home."

So I said, "Then why are you worried so much about saving the one you
have? You'll be shopping for a new one on Tuesday anyway." It's funny how
the reality of our situation clouds the reality of our dinar situation.

4 comments:

Estimate the amended exchange rate of the Iraqi dinar to be used in technical and economical feasibility studies and for (1.134) dollar per dinar. This price should be approved for 3 years until re-appreciation by the competent authorities.

I have a question for anyone that might be in the know? I am an Exec for a Company, where a client committed to invest a substantial amount in our project! He claimed that his funds came from THE EXCHANGE OF IRAQI DINAR. That he was second TIER exch. at 20 to 1.That his contact Through The FED Transferred to the US Treasury Dept. as of Jan 7,2014. That this agent for the US Treasury would wire such funds to us for the Investment.If I bought his Dinars w/in his platform, that US T Agent would have FED bank accts set up in my name, I just had to go to the FED in Dallas to set up w/ a signatory card!? So, through the machination he said because of his TIER 2 status he is considered a Iraqi exchange dealer or Agent! I asked for a Dealer # or Agent # and he didn't have one. This lead to a element of consternation on my point!! So I then asked if I could talk to said Treasury Agent? He then gave me 2 phone #'s and said that when I called if she (Brenda Smith) didn't answer that it would roll to a VM saying Black Jack # is unavailable?? I googled Black Jack, it's a phone service that they are using exclusively to handle all Dinarians??? Has anyone else be through this BS?

Nesaranews Mission Statement

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?

Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

11

Followers

The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.