88 .. 1t) " >(' .. '.....' '-..)"., .... - Introductory Offer: Five-Way Sampler Discover the two-inch thick English Muffin made almost entIrely by hand, not pre-split or machine pressed like other EnglIsh Muffins. Available in five flavors: Original, Light Wheat, Cinnamon-Raisin, Blueberry I and Cheddar Cheese. SATISFACTION GUARANTEED! o Sampler Case #771: Contains 4 dozen English Muffins; all five flavors. $20.00 + $3.90 UPS I o Sampler Half-Case #736: Contains 2 dozen English Muffins; all five flavors. $13.00 + 8290 UPS Order Includes a free catalog Name I I I J Address City DMC DVisa DAmEx# o Please send catalog #836 only $1 enclosed (applicable towards purchase). I ;Vnte to: Wolferman's, One Muffin Lane North Kansas City, MO 64116. r CALL TOLL FREE 1-800-255-0169; In Missouri or Kansas City, call 1-816-283-0797 collect ------------------ State Zip Exp ..-:. '.f..: . 100 0 0 GENUINE SHEARLING SLIPPERS Soft warm, COID- ::: ç)rtable. Cozy as a crackling fire n a Winter night. Styled 'n' ...andhand-crafted with the "attêritìon to detail thafsbeen .-'"an"L,.B. Evans traditîon for "" ISO years. Snuggle up to a p Ìr, "f.ìne stores everywhere. ::,evans '$UpPERS FOR WOMEN . ..... o. . .... IJ OCTOBER 20,1986 through "rhetorical devices," exam- ples of which he has typed out on the card. "McEvilley went down claiming that he never did or said a single thing that was wrong," Rubin says. "At least I admitted that I was wrong about the number of objects in the vitrines, though I don't think I was as wrong as McEvilley believes. The point is, these rhetorical devices that he has obviously studied somewhere are for winning arguments, not for getting to the truth. I never studied rhetoric, so I'm disadvantaged to that extent. It may be that McEvilley is emotionally so offended by the very conception of the show that he can't see straight. And I think it kind of shocked him, and hurt him, that he was being questioned at all. The tone of his reaction seems to me to contain not a little anger at being called on to defend himself. His interest only in winning an argument is how I explain his unwillingness to see if there is a common ground. I'm only human. If someone uses invective on me, and slithery techniques to prove he's al- ways right, I'm going to come straight back-I'm not going to try and find common ground either. But I think there is common ground. I don't think McEvilley really believes half these extreme things he says." Like a teacher handing out reading material to a class, Rubin hands me a pack of Xeroxes he has made of McEvilley's article, of his letters and Varnedoe's, of McEvilley's replies to them, of various other reviews of the primitivism show, and of an exchange in A rtforum in 1967 between him and Harold Rosenberg over a piece Rubin wrote on Jackson Pollock, which McEvilley cited in his second reply. Referring to a set of Xeroxes of his own, which I notice are extensively underlined, Rubin proceeds, like one of Borges' obsessed men, to go over the entire exchange, point by point. He continues this rite of self-justification for the next two hours, touching yet again on the dread vitrines, and also on the other exhibition that McEvilley cited -that of the MeniI Collection in the Grand Palais in 1984. "McEvilley dismisses our show as old hat because it was done before, in the Menil show," he tells me "Then I write in to say that in the Menil show there were only two juxtaposed examples of primitive art and modern art, and that all the rest of the tribal art was shown separately, in its own area. And how does McEvilley respond to this? He responds by blinding the reader, in