Monday, June 27, 2016

It's a compilation of clips that is nearly an hour long. If you can get a Hillary supporter to watch it and they still want to vote for her afterwards, then there is nothing that can change their mind.

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Santa Monica: Two police officers who wish to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation say that James Wesley Howell, an Indiana man who was found with a car full of explosives and weapons on Sunday morning, told police he was part of a team that planned shooting attacks on gay communities in Florida and California.

Howell told police he was turning himself in because he wanted protection. His story was that he had been assured by his recruiters that he would not be harmed in the shooting but, when he heard on the news that Omar Mateen, the lead gunman in the Orlando group, had been killed by sniper fire, he realized he was being set up as a patsy and would be killed.

Soon after that, the FBI took over the investigation, and information to the public was filtered to remove any facts that might show the Orlando shooting as a planned event involving others. GetOffTheBS 2016 Jun 15 (Story) (Cached)It is important to remember that the police officers who are the source of this story choose to remain anonymous, so it cannot be independently verified at this time, but circumstantial evidence supports it. For example:

(1) After the FBI took charge of the investigation, Police Chief Jacqueline Seabrooks changed her original report that Howell was part of a group of five people who intended to do harm at the gay-pride event in West Hollywood. Her altered report made no mention of anyone other than Howell.

(2) The web site that reported this story is still carrying the article without triggering legal action against it. That is significant because, if the story is false, immediate legal action would be expected. If it is true, Howell will be killed or ‘disappeared’ to prevent him from talking, but the last thing the perpetrators would want is a public trial where witnesses can be called to testify.

This news story could be one of the most important reports ever published in the annals of journalism.

Saturday, June 18, 2016

WASHINGTON, DC — Hillary Clinton received a classified intelligence report stating that the Obama administration was actively supporting Al Qaeda in Iraq, the terrorist group that became the Islamic State.The memo made clear that Al Qaeda in Iraq was speaking through Muhammad Al Adnani, who is now the senior spokesman for the Islamic State, also known as ISIS. Western and Gulf states were supporting the terrorist group to try to overthrow Syrian dictator Bashar al Assad, who was being propped up by the Russians, Iranians, and Chinese.

In August 2012, a “SECRET” classified memo was sent to various top Obama administration officials and agencies, including to the State Department and to Clinton’s office personally.“The document is an IAR, an intelligence information report,” said Christopher J. Farrell, who serves on the board of directors of Judicial Watch, which obtained the document. “It is produced by somebody within the Defense intelligence agency (DIA). It is reporting from the field by an intelligence agent” who could be a U.S. government agent, a defense attaché, or a source.------------------------------------------------Farrell confirmed that the report was sent to Clinton’s office, based on the recipient marking “RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHINGTON DC.”The report identifies Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) as being one of the principal elements of the Syrian opposition, which the West was choosing to “support.”

THE GENERAL SITUATION:A. INTERNALLY, EVENTS ARE TAKING A CLEAR SECTARIAN DIRECTION.B. THE SALAFIST, THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND AQI ARE THE MAJOR FORCES DRIVING THE INSURGENCY IN SYRIA.C. THE WEST, GULF COUNTRIES, AND TURKEY SUPPORT THE OPPOSITION; WHILE RUSSIA, CHINA, AND IRAN SUPPORT THE REGIME.

Rob, Lee Ann, & David discuss the failures of the Terror Watch/No Fly List and the children, dead people and politicians that are on it.

Terror list snag nearly grounded Ted Kennedy - "If they have that kind of difficulty with a member of Congress, how in the world are average Americans, who are getting caught up in this thing, how are they going to be treated fairly and not have their rights abused?" Kennedy asked Homeland Security undersecretary Asa Hutchinson. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-08-19-kennedy-list_x.htm

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Topic comes up somewhere within the first ten minutes, must hear info! Later in the program Savage argues that cholesterol is not the issue, but rather whether saturated fat oxidizes in the body, hence the important role of antioxidants.

Related:

Biomedical research pioneer Dr. Joel Wallach joins Alex Jones to discuss what the establishment pharmaceutical companies don’t want you to hear; the message of wellness through natural health.

It is now confirmed that in addition to two investigations and two interviews, Florida terror suspect Omar Mateen was also approached by “informants” working for the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) over a period of 10 months.

Mateen first appeared on authorities’ radar in 2013 after the security guard’s colleagues alerted the FBI to inflammatory statements he made to colleagues claiming “family connections to Al Qaeda,” according to Comey.

Mateen also told coworkers he had a family member who belonged to Hezbollah, a Shia network that is a bitter enemy of ISIS — the network he pledged allegiance to the night of the carnage, Comey noted.

The FBI’s Miami office opened an inquiry into Mateen.

“He said he hoped that law enforcement would raid his apartment and assault his wife and child so he could martyr himself,” Comey said.

Nevertheless, FBI investigators investigated Mateen, who was born in New York, for 10 months. They introduced him to confidential informants, spied on his communications and followed him. They also interviewed him twice.

Informants Posing as Handlers

The significance of this cannot be understated. “Informants” in this context, according to FBI affidavits regarding similar counterterrorism investigations, refers to individuals posing as members of terrorist organizations who approach suspects, coerce them into planning and preparing for terrorist attacks, before finally aiding the FBI in the suspect’s arrest before the attack is finally carried out.

"He kept on shooting and shooting and shooting, rapid fire,’’ Gonzalez said, “and he’d change (clips), put in more ammunition — bud-dudda. I could smell the ammo in the air.’’He said he heard another gun from a different direction, so he wonders if there were two gunmen.“Everybody dropped to the floor. We were trying to look for an exit. But the main exit was right next to the entrance where the shooter was shooting,’’ he said.“In a moment of desperation we were all crawling on the floor trying to find a place to exit. I looked to my right and I could see people going through some curtains. We were digging through the curtains and found a door.’’But he said the door was blocked by a man. He wasn’t sure if it was a club security person or an accomplice to the gunmen.http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/news/eyewitness-account-from-within-pulse-nightclub/nrfJF/

The significance of this cannot be understated. “Informants” in this context, according to FBI affidavits regarding similar counterterrorism investigations, refers to individuals posing as members of terrorist organizations who approach suspects, coerce them into planning and preparing for terrorist attacks, before finally aiding the FBI in the suspect’s arrest before the attack is finally carried out.

Among the activities these informants carry out includes providing and training suspects in the use of real explosives, providing suspects with arsenals of weapons precisely like those used in the recent shooting in Orlando Florida, and encouraging suspects to adopt “radical ideology” over the course of the investigation. Suspects are given the false impression that they are working on behalf of terrorist organizations like Al Qaeda or the self-proclaimed “Islamic State,” often cultivating delusions of grandeur among otherwise mentally ill suspects.

The Sydney Morning Herald carried a US story in 2006 where they said that Zarqawi (featured in the comic) was used in a propaganda blitz to label the general Iraqi insurgency as being Al Qaeda-linked, when it was not. The US military, contrary to the general media reports, considered Al Zarqawi's role to be very minor at that time (the comic said he had broad appeal):

At the same time the US created Shiite death squads as a method of countering the insurgents - which lead to more than 3000 people a month being killed. The mainstream media even reported on the Shiite death squad creation:

The US role in escalating the situation is omitted by the comic, as was their use of Zarqawi as propaganda.

One must also consider this comic strip narrative in light of the US WMD intelligence, which was wrong and in many places Fabricated - such as the Yellow Cake Uranium forgeries, the aluminium tubes, the non-existent meeting of Iraqi officials and Al Qaeda in Prague, Curveball's nuke weapons claims, etc.

In may cases, with the WMDs, Bush officials said they KNEW EXACTLY where chemical sites were (Rumsfeld), that were North South West and East of Baghdad but ...

.... there was never any corresponding intelligence reports to back up what people like Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and other neocons said. They were making stuff up. These were lies.

Likewise we should be careful about the Al Qaeda tales told to us by US officials.

This does not mean that Al Qaeda does not exist, but we should be careful when it comes to accepting the US account of how the organisation is run, and who is supporting them.

Informed people like journalist Seymour Hersh, ex-French foreign minister Roland Dumas, and General Wesley Clark have all said that the 'civil war' in Syria was something that was planned in the West, a number of years before fighting broke out.

The US Defence Intelligence Agency in a declassified document from 2012 stated that "the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey" were supporting Salafists, the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI (Al Qaeda in Iraq/ISIS) in Syria and that they were aiming to foster a Salafist 'blocking state' to interfere with relations between Shiite Iran, Iraq, and Syria. (The DIA report is easy to look up)

General Clark famously said on TV that the US uses extremists for foreign policy objectives (regime change).

There is clear evidence that US proxies, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia, have been aiding ISIS (plus other extremist groups in Syria). Veteran mainstream journalist Robert Fisk said as much on Australian TV (Lateline). There is also video of trucks (with arms and oil) and fighters freely moving from Turkey to Syria, and nothing is done to stop what is happening.

The Turkish President's family is up to their eyeballs in the ISIS oil trade too (via his son). None of this is hard to look up. And it's not an internet creation - we have German TV crews showing what was occurring on the border.

IMHO, although a nice comic strip, the material here simply serves as propaganda that masks the harsh realities of what is going on - extremist nut cases being puppeteered via support from Nation States in order to overthrow or disrupt the (secular) Shiite Governments of that region.

The extremists do want to have their own Islamic State, but they are being heavily supported by outside forces and would not exist without such help.

And I could go on about how military bloggers criticised the (phony) US air campaign against ISIS (before the Russians came in) and that it looked like they (the US) were doing next to nothing (and that pilots later interviewed said they were not allowed to hit 75%+ of their targets etc), but I have to stop somewhere.

I follow this stuff fairly closely. I don't like to see the public being hoodwinked.

ps. I forgot to add that we should ALSO not trust the US account of events in the region because of how Team Bush and people like General 'death-squad-facilitator' Patraeus in 2006-7 were trying to tie the insurgency in Iraq to Iran and said Iran was illegally developing nuclear weapons. More lies.

Regarding the insurgency, the US claimed Iran was supplying shaped charge explosives (EFPs) that were destroying armoured vehicles. Two things sank the propaganda - which was aimed at launching a war with Iran in 2007/2008 - one was the fact that factories were discovered INSIDE Iraq that were making the shaped charge explosives only 'Iran could make' (Google: efp factory Iraq 2007, for multiple headlines) and the November 2007 National Intelligence Estimate on Iran, that was leaked, which said Iran was NOT developing a bomb. Bush is on video saying he has no idea why the Intelligence agencies were saying the opposite of what the neocons had been saying.

See the link below for the 2007 NIE summary which is what really sank the propaganda. At the time the conflict in Iraq was deeply unpopular, the US was effectively losing, and few people in the military thought that opening a new front against Iran was a good idea. Not everyone inside the US military-intelligence establishment was willing to go along (again) with further stories used to justify a new war.

For those of us who were present both last year and this year, the tone of the debate was strikingly different. We felt a much higher degree of receptiveness, as well as a reluctance by opponents of the resolution to enthusiastically champion the official account.

The bottom line is this. Trump is not a racist or sexist. But don't take my word for it, just ask his former female Mexican and former female black employees. The judge is undoubtedly treating Trump unfairly and is associated with a racist group. Trump's policies have been misconstrued as being against members of that racist group and therefore it was Trump that, in bringing up the La Raza issue, essentially questioned whether racism was at hand. He never said, as many have claimed, that a Mexican or Muslim judge couldn't be impartial. He was just saying it was "possible," based on misunderstandings of his policies, that such judges could be biased against him. It is truly amazing that this got twisted around to Trump being a racist. Trump is just a realist.