<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Peter Breitsprecher <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:pkbreits@lakeheadu.ca">pkbreits@lakeheadu.ca</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>I knew that it was the result of the internal function call, but that it would have been the value of that variable that is passed to it. and the other list so far would have been the stacked value of list so far before the internal function call. However I still thought it should have worked logically. </div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div>I just wanted to return the value of list-so-far at that point, and I assumed that was the way to do it. Putting the reverse in still give me the same errors<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Since you might have changed the code again it&#39;s probably easier to see what&#39;s going on now if you show the latest code. </div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>yc</div>
<div><br></div></div>