"- It is the anger, in any
case." (The impassioned answer by Dr Lotti Helström, Head of the Stockholm Emergency Clinic for Raped Women AVK, toAftonbladet, on what was
her motivation in her AVK job) [31]

“The gender war is as I
said an extremely stupid idea. Gender-related hatred, likewise. Women who hate
men - men as a collective, most men or men in a clump - are probably damaged.
Most often they make up their own (individual) trauma to a general truth. Men
who hate women - women as a collective, the majority of women or women in a
clump - are also injured. They elevate their own traumas or
disappointments to a general truth”. . . “As for the relationship between men
and women there exists an old 60's refrain telling which the right thing to do,
indeed is: make love not war.” (Comment by Trenterx in a Flashback
forum digging on the Swedish case against Assange) [32]

“However, true egalitarian feminism and extreme
state-"feminism" are two different things. State-feminism is the
cultural and political movement aimed to establish - with the help of the
authority - institutional feminist privileges and legislations based in a
vulgar ideology of gender-hatred or contempt, or in simple opportunism. For the
radical "feminists" behind the architecture of State-feminism, the
gender-egalitarianism mantra is just a tactical cover in their strategic to
achieve gender supremacy. In this sense, State-Feminism is the replacement of
one abusive power for another.” (The Professors blogg) [33]

“It is the role of good journalism to take on powerful abusers, and
when powerful abusers are taken on, there's always a bad reaction. So we see
that controversy, and we believe that is a good thing to engage in.” (Julian
Assange, Interview with The Guardian) [34]

Contents: I) A likely forensic examination scenario
in the case Assange - II) Public Clinics with private political agendas
- III) Alienating the
movement - III) Divide et vinces Julian Assange
- Paramountly, it is not about gender-equality - IV) The use of the Julian Assange "case" in Sweden as symbolic
issue and political instrument

A likely forensic-psychiatry
"examination" scenario* in the case Assange

Reports in the
prolific underground
investigations around the Swedish case against Assange - all amid
the hermetic silence of the mainstream media - indicate that a "triumph
card" in possession of Prosecutor Marianne Ny would be a certain
forensic certificate issued to one of the women-accusers most possible issued
at the Stockholm Emergency Clinic for Raped Women (Akut Mottagning för
Våldtagna Kvinnor, Söder Hospital), for brevity referred thereafter as AVK
[for data and a synoptic description of the AVK.

The Police protocols
of the interrogations in the Assange case stated that "SW" - one of
the Assange accusers - had approved at the Police Station that the forensic
certificate could be requested ("S ger sitt medgivande till inhämtande
av rättsintyg", at page 11 of the protocol, Swedish version,
"Police interrogation of SW") [37].

The leading newspaper Dagens
Nyheter previously informed that the AVK clinic have issued forensic
expert-statements (rättsintyg) at rape trials in "most of the rape cases in the Stockholm
area" [24]. For her
part, Dr Lotti Helström - the clinic head - had publicly acknowledged
AVK's own initiative-taking towards the issuing of such certificates with the
special purpose to be used by them in litigation cases. Helström have even declared to the press that "No one else issue forensic certificates for our patients.
If we would not have asked for those (forensic certificates), no one else would
have done that, at all."[38].

(Note that a manifested main objective of the AVK clinic
- as inferred from media declarations - is to obtain a higher number of
convicted men for rape in Sweden through their "forensic
certificates", for which Lotti Helström [at left] pressures the police
authority to further increase the number of rape-investigations on the base
of the AVK own "forensic" documenting of reported cases. However, a
real certified forensic-medicine specialist - Dr Martina Olsson Frisk - who
have studied at the court several certificates issued by Helström,
characterizes those certificates as "catastrophic" and adds that
Lotti Helström fails to distinguish "objective injuries" from
"the patients' descriptions of their feelings") [24].

An informed source communicated to the Professors
blogg that a visit of SW to the AVK clinic have taken place with "99
per cent of certainty", and that the visit would have occurred the 20 of
August. Public conjectures have given instead the date 21 of August. I wish to
stress that I have no further confirmation of such reports.

On the other hand, as no physical injury was reported to
exist in the "rape cases", it is highly likely that the documentation
would have referred in that case to mental-status related sequelae. This aspect
profiled our hypothesized scenario to the analysis of mental-health status
and psychiatric diagnoses performed by the AVK clinic. A main material for this
investigation is the forensic documentation and statements delivered by Dr
Lotti Helström in a court trial in Uppsala 2009 and reviewed by the Court
of Appeals in Stockholm 2010. The details of the case with regard to the
forensic-psychiatric material are treated in Part IV in this series.

* "A scenario is definedas a description of
several possible descriptions of a situation. The purpose of having a scenario
is to list a combination of events that describe how a situation might occur in
the future."

Public Clinics with private political
agendas

That the state does
funnel public expenditure to clinics for the psychiatric-health and wellbeing
of its citizens is just logic. Likewise, that the state would try to increase
the juridical security of its citizens by helping them objectively to document
sustained psychic injury to be presented at the courts. And I regard this
particularly necessary in the cases of rape, torture victims and other forms of
abusive violence including the one exercised by the authority against those
defending a just or noble cause.

But what if such
clinics are transformed - or were so devised - to run an ideological and
political agenda to favour interests of a selected group among the state
citizens, against the interest of the principle justice for all? In fact, the
officialopening
ceremony of the AVK clinic was led by Birgitta Sevefjord, a politician from
the establishment's "Vänster" Party - an
organization known for extreme feminist views and at a time led by Gudrun
Schyman (who compared Swedish
men with Afghan Taliban).

Or worst, what if the forensic
documentation in those clinics is done in a biased, false
and deceiving fashion directed to obtain the arresting of innocent men (in
the referred case) by prosecutors, or even convictions to imprisonment at the
courts on behalf of the part they privilege? In other words, what if the
clinics are using public funds to cheat justice and the public?

And further, what if the health authorities – fully
aware of what is going on – refuses to intervene? Are they not de factum
approving that such flawed, inaccurate health-status certifications will make
the difference between acquittals and convictions - between life and freedom
and years in prison? Even in those trials otherwise deprived of reliable
forensic evidence, why to let pseudo science surrogate common sense?

Alienating the movement

And even worst, what if a Swedish constellation of
radical-feminists [see Note 39] and populist politicians are applauding,
unseen from the benches far back in the darkness, the excesses showed in the
AVK scene in hope for new repetitions? Or a great final, like the crescendo
composed for the verdict of their dreams, Assange's conviction?

Why? Because it seems to be engraved in the primeval
fanatic design of such collective believes (like in religion) the perennial
searching for always newer, harder laws, to regulate "on earth" the
natural love between humans. But is all from a movement in it self
alienated of human touch and compassion spirit.

Freudianism - as the modern time's faith serving modern
theocracy - is a destructive, anti-human philosophy that filters away natural
reality and wishes to replace it with archetypes of guilt and mistrust. It is
not about rights of for the humans, it is instead about the rights for an
establishment deprived of humanity. In the electronic era, this era, the
"threat" to those in power is believed to be posed by electronic
heros like Julian Assange. In older times was Miguel Enríquez or before him
Bertrand Russell or Che Guevara, and before Lincoln or Tolstoj, and Giordano
Bruno, or Sidharta Gautama, Diogenes, and so on.

However, that Assange's Wikileaks would be a course for
modern society is a wrong political perception from the part of those in power:
The ideology of Transparency in government brought about by Assange and
Wikileaks could become in fact their survival. Ergo, the campaigns against this
philosophy, against this organization, and against Julian Assange as a person,
can result only self-destructive. And also because there is no weaponry in
Assange's Wikileaks other than civil courage.

In the Swedish domestic front things got complicated,
because Assange was perceived also as an ideological - if not political -
catalysis factor among an emergent however ideologically confounded political
youth (e.g. Pirate Party), also heirs of the electronic civilization and to
a certain extent matured in the blog or Internet-front skirmishes around the
FRA-legislation and the Pirate Bay trial. Inspired by Wikileaks they got closer
and closer in revealing some secrets of old Swedish relics and uses of
government.

But every time one gets close to revealing faked
mysteries, the cathedrals of power send anew their priests and these change for
us one sin for another, and new collective psychological-debts emerges. There
is no doubt on that the use of Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology
categories have been widely used by governments and establishments particularly
during and after the
psychological-warfare campaigns devised to convince Europa's public that
the invasions in the oil-rich Middle East were legitimate and necessary to, for
instance, inhibit Sadam Hussein's mass-destruction weaponry, etc. In Sweden it
was also essayed around the military participation in Afghanistan and in
association with the promotion of the FRA-legislation.

Divide et vinces

During this period we observe the re-installation of the
gender-related theme, in conflicting terms, now with a debut in younger
generations. Freudian intellectuals at the service of those in power devised a
number of psychological campaigns, some of them improperly attributed to the
new "social network" phenomenon.

When the establishment decided the using and crucifixion
of Julian Assange (I have essayed a political explanation of the plot
elsewhere), the Talk-about
program was put in action. It is about using people's "grey
zones" manufactured and exported by the Freudians themselves. It is their
set of codes and clinical vocabulary but in a popular version.

One among the older priests the establishment uses to
send down to "clarify" the youth by means of replacing
"old" sins for "new" ones, has been lawyer Claes
Borgström [picture at left], in several occasions. I still remember when years
ago he was sent to explain male school-children that - if I may construct a
blunt synopsis - they should not be ashamed to play with dolls. The old
Freudian trick in fact was to transfer the boys they should feel shame of
playing ball or "combat" games. I hear it all in the notable P1 (a
classical State-Feminist "cultural institution". A Radio channel,
pubic owned).

Paramount, it is not about gender-equality

In a discussion earlier this year organized by the
Women-Lobby in the aftermath of the anti-Assange campaign #Prataomdet Claes Borgström [picture above] brought the thesis that it is the time for us men to
replace the sin-notion of "collective guilt" (about the endemic and
eternal suffering of women in the "patriarchal" system) for the
sin-notion of "responsibility". It is obvious what is expected by
the lawyer of the Assange accusers that we have to reflect and do
consequently in order to "work with" this new psychological challenge
against our rebellious hypothalamus.

It is politics, all through, it is about power - if not
about power abuse - and the strategies devised to keep the plebe in line.

It is paramount not about women rights; definitely.
These rights are already well cemented in the Swedish law as well as in the
social consciousness of the public. And it is hardly about rape. NO
rational and decent person in Sweden is for rape or could possibly
defend a rape act.

The aim of this veritable anti-science, pro-Freudian
sexist crusade seems instead to advance towards the affective, the social, and
the aesthetical negation of "natural" individuals - men and women, to
be transformed en ideologized robots under a supremacist moral. For pushing
forward such "culture", and to concrete it into legislation, they
need to "demonstrate" that rapists are all on the loop, that every
man is a potential predator (all "men are animals"). They
will struggle to make the statistics showing a "truth" as close
possible to their faith and principal prejudice. They know that the AVK is
doing the work in that direction. Heighten number of flawed, inaccurate or
false-conclusions in "forensic certificates" will produce more
convictions - regardless of course the issue of justice.

And at the end, this
"sexier" increased "statistics" will serve to legitimate
and argue for a further radicalization (read, a further narrowing) of the rape
concept, and afterwards, what? The entire gender-relationship concept?

The use of the Julian Assange "case" in Sweden as symbolic
issue and political instrument

The other politician invited by
the AVK's Lotti Helstrom to address their inauguration ceremony was nothing
less than Claes Borgström, the actual radical-feminist lawyer behind the instigatingof the accusation against Julian
Assange in Sweden (an initiative proudly
publicized by his partner Thomas
Bodström at their law firm Bodström & Borgström, himself also
member of the Social democratic Party and the former Swedish minister of
Justice. He would have met recently with Lotti Helström in a
reception invited by the head of the Gotland Province and who
previously was Director of the Karolinska Hospital during the time it
flourished there (at the hospital SESAM
clinic) Lotti Helström's notorious"bloody"
advices to immigrant brides.

For all these
religious-like activists operating in the Swedish duck pond, most of them with
their public-funded professions, Julian Assange is - as acknowledged - just a
political "symbol", a juridical trophy of blood and soul they can
arrest, foot-cuff, denigrate, extradite, or sale further for a final crucifixion
in some NATO compound in exchange for better international feminist positions,
and from there impose their agenda to "uncivilized" colonies and
"honour cultures".

In sum: The Affair Assange in Sweden was indeed, and
still is - as Sonja Schwarzenberger has acknowledged- a
symbolic issue [35]. "The case" was a formidable
propaganda weapon created with the collaboration of these religious frenzied
radical-feminists in their struggle for the re-emerging of an
Inquisitional world.

And the issue with Symbols is that they "throw
together" (according to the etymologic roots, from the Greek σύμβολον
= sýmbolon) [40]. What do they care this special breed of feminists
about altruistic, universal principles, beyond their national-chauvinistic,
narrow minded religious cult? How do they put together the contradictory
formula "Patriotic Swedish - NATO allegiance"?, or their
national-culture fetish and the selling of the nation's integrity? Who has thrown
together their ranks for the task to crucify Julian Assange and the
universal values he really represents?

One wonders what - if any - political philosophy
would enlighten the souls of such gendercentric movement of ego-centered
chauvinists. They really do believe that Sweden’s duck pond should
be the model in those regards to the rest of the world, to those
primitive and gender-illiterates that would have lived over 20 millions years
amid an "anti-natural", equivocal concept of family values and
love. The nearest I can come to think of it would be fascism. Yet, fascism
has hated many things, but not the institution of family.

What possible altruism these anti-humankind feminists
can see beyond the Freudian contemplation of their microscopic navels?

Because Transparency exercised in government, and
hopefully in all governments, will diminish the necessity for Authority and
enlighten the praxis of Democracy. And this can give better
guarantee, or hope, that the survival of the entire planet can be accomplish
with peace and dignity. In other words, a future amid truth will be the only
possible civilization. The solely alternative is the perpetuation of war and
the risk for an end without winners.

Serious criticism have been put forward about the scientific mockery AVK has done with a psychiatric PTSD diagnosis as
presented at the Swedish courts. If any such mental-status evaluation and "posttraumatic
diagnosis" done in similar terms by the AVK would be presented in the
Assange case in the eventuality of a trial, that certificate should serve best
the cause of justice by been dismissed straight in merit these
factual arguments below. Otherwise, they should be scrutinized by an objective
panel of PTSD experts, rather from abroad, and independent of government,
political establishment or authority.

That means: You are free to copy, distribute, display, the above-referred materials, under the following conditions

Attribution. You must attribute the work (full text, text excerpts, or artwork as indicated above) in this specified manner: Author’s name and hyperlink of the article or artwork in the Professors blog

Any of these conditions may be waived by seeking permission from Professors blogg. For contact email fdenoli@gmail.com