I know two companies that chose to use it reasons being (in this order):
* portability (C only and tested on a huge number of platforms)
* license (ASF v2) !!!
* very low footprint
* API stability, quality of code, active project still being developed.
but as far as they haven't said this out loud I won't point them out.
--
Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On 8/30/07, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On 8/30/07, Haworth1234@aol.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > I know this is a loaded question, but I'm concerned about using APR too
> > early in the life cycle, as my clients would be concerned with application
> > reliability/stability.
> >
> > Would you be able to point me to any other "evidence" that APR is "ready for
> > prime time?"
> >
> > Thanks for your help, and especially for your rapid response!! :)
>
> *The* http server (Apache) has been using it since the early days of
> 2.0 (it's at 2.2 and a lot of years later now).
>
> Also, Subversion is using it. More and more businesses are adopting
> Subversion as their version control solution. It's been stable for
> many years now (even though it's still 'only' numbered 1.4).
>
> HTH,
>
> Erik.
>