Been doing a lot of research about this chemical attack because it just irks me the wrong way. They are trying to paint a military leader as another batshit madman, when North Korea actually does batshit stuff all the time and nobody does anything about it.

Anyway, I’m convinced this chemical attack is a hoax or was perpetrated by “rebel forces” aka NATO black ops agents and I have facts and have created some handy material for quickly discerning what I phrase the “flow of aggression”, that is the source and motivating factor for Syrian conflict. It’s multi-sourced and for multiple reasons.

First off - Money. NATO wants control of that pipeline. Or they want their allies in control of that pipeline, which their allies are not currently in control of both pipelines, only one. Syria and Russia are in control of the 2nd pipeline. Who do you hear about all day long is the big bad evil? Syria and Russia. Yet their pipeline supplies oil to Europe, so they can’t be barbaric, however they make money from that and NATO wants that money all for themselves. Or at least a cut of it, which its not getting any right now.

It’s about islamic terror, western naivete, globalist manipulation, and taking America/Trump down. I would like to see all US troops withdrawn from all islamic hell holes; let them kill each other to their bloodlust’s limit, they don’t need or want our help.To hell with goat humpers, rebuild America.

Plans are in the works to make the Iraqi portion of the pipeline functional again, those plans have yet to come to fruition. Syria has at least 2.5 billion barrels of oil in its fields, making it the next largest Middle Eastern oil producer after Iraq.

Makes you wonder why the neocons are so hard over on deposing Assad, doesn’t it?

It wouldn’t surprise me if this was a CIA Black Op orchestrated by a warmonger such as ‘Songbird’ McCain to draw Trump into the conflict. I hope he doesn’t fall for it because why would Russia or Assad do such a thing at this stage of the game. They are beating the rebels. Just doesn’t make sense.

Pointing out that the prospect of peace in Syria was moving closer before the attack, with ISIS and Al-Qaeda on the run, Paul said "It looks like maybe somebody didn’t like that so there had to be an episode...who benefits?... It doesn’t make any...

Ron Paul absolutely is right. The corrupt and evil warmongers who run the Banana Empire planted a false flag. Trump needs to refuse the bait and remind Americans this is why they defeated Hillary, the whore of the neocons, police state and Soros.

The move was against everything Trump had said previously about Assad, and was triggered by a propaganda video featuring the White Helmets. The videos portray victims of what is very clearly NOT sarin. It was rebel propaganda created the WEEK AFTER the Trump administration said they weren’t concerned with getting rid of Assad. I’ll even go as far as to say that actual dead people were seen in some of the footage, but as we know, the rebels haven’t been afraid to take whatever opportunity they can to get sympathy in a civil war they are losing against a secular country.

I’m not prone to conspiracy theories but Lawrence O’Donnell started off his show last night with what at this point could be called a conspiracy theory but that makes a lot of logical sense. What if Putin orchestrated everything that just happened in Syria beginning with the chemical attack all the way through Trump’s response? Consider the following:

Russia is Assad’s staunchest ally and stepped in to save him when he was losing ground in the civil war.

Putin was responsible for making sure Syria had gotten rid of all of its chemical weapons and capacity to create more.

Nobody can come up with a reason why Assad would suddenly launch a small-scale chemical attack when all the momentum is on his side.

The U.S. missile strike was so ineffective that Syria was using the same air base today to launch attacks.

All of this coincided with Chinese President Xi’s visit to the United States.

So, really, what is more logical? That Assad, with no apparent reason, decides to embarrass Putin by launching an attack using chemical weapons that Putin was responsible for making sure he no longer possessed? Or that Putin devises this plan to strengthen Trump’s image (look at all the people saying Trump acted “presidential”), divert attention away from Trump’s scandals including but not limited to the Russia investigation, allow Trump to look like he’s finally standing up to Russia, and to poke President Xi making his high-profile visit a secondary story?

I don’t think that we even have to go so far as tying it in with Putin (not that I would rule it out) to see this action as a farce.

We spent $90 million to put on a show and a distraction.
Tomahawk missiles are accurate to within a 9 foot radius of its objective and can be retargeted in flight via a satellite link. There’s also a camera on each to allow for a view of the target before impact.

Each missile has a 1,000 lb conventional explosives payload, so after delivering nearly 60,000 lbs of explosives the airfield was down for about twelve hours with minimal damage.

Who chose the targets, why were so many buildings left standing and why are those runways still usable?

The more I look into this the more skeptical I become about the rationale for the strike. I wasn’t expecting to spend an inordinate amount of time on this lovely weekend researching tomahawk missiles, but here I am.