Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Mihai Caleap prepares the acoustic metamaterial at the University of Bristol.

A metamaterial with acoustic properties that can be reconfigured in less
than one tenth of a second has been made by researchers at the
University of Bristol in the UK. Created by Mihai Caleap and Bruce Drinkwater,
the device comprises tiny polystyrene spheres suspended in water. The
spheres arrange themselves in a cubic lattice that is defined by
criss-crossing acoustic standing waves. The lattice blocks sound at
certain frequencies that depend on the spacing between the spheres and,
with further development, it could be used to create lenses that focus
sound or even acoustic cloaks. See: Acoustic metamaterial can be reconfigured in a jiffy

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

In contrast I seek to awaken a fair and good interpretation of the "I AM" as the intellect and, and about our choices. How we make them, and how we can be mindful of them. So here in lies my understanding that, one's intellect must be in charge to refer to the one as sitting in a position not egotistically centered, but the ego in the "I am," egotistically centered.:) It can be Illusive as to pinpoint "the center." So God then, is Symmetry, and Symmetry has been broken?

It is never easy to understand the full scope of the question of, by belief alone. So I sought here to try and give this Free Will some foundation.

Whether a particular thing happens, says Aristotle, may depend on a series of causes that

"goes back to some starting-point, which does not go back to something
else. This, therefore, will be the starting-point of the fortuitous, and
nothing else is the cause of its generation." Metaphysics Book VI 1027b12-14)
See: The Cogito Model

The direct action, according to my understanding is that one has "gained from experience." So experience, is in a way "a value system" which I may use in order to understand those choices, as well as, to use that "information" to make decisions. In this way, I have set the causal affect for the future as to a determination with which causal chains must be linked back too, this original position??

Pierre Curie (1894): “Asymmetry is what creates a phenomenon.”

So with a place in mind, as the intellect, we see what transpires as we "project into the future." So then, as to set the course of action dependent upon, the theory behind the ability of Free Will. This becomes a determinant feature in the link as a causal that is no longer left too, happen stance.

I suspect that will, qualia, meaning and intentionality will turn out to be understood to be aspects of nature. But I suspect that by the time we have achieved this our understanding of nature will be quite different. That is, I suspect that we will only succeed in reducing minds to atoms when we have revolutionized our understanding of atoms in some way presently inconceivable.

I only have an intuition about the first step in this process, which is to bring time and the present moment-the now-into science and make it central to physics and prior to law. By embracing presentism and the openness of the future we radically recast the context for understanding what it means for anything-rock or atom or mind-to be part of nature. Lee Smolin

If we trace back this idea of Indeterminacy, what do we find? And how shall we find such an exchange as getting to the heart of the problem as to say, "
it is quite wrong to try founding a theory on observable
magnitudes alone. " Einstein goes on to say that it is the theory that decides what it is that we can observe.

"Possibly I did use this kind of reasoning," Einstein admitted,
"but it is nonsense all the same. Perhaps I could put it
more diplomatically by saying that it may be heuristically useful
to keep in mind what one has actually observed. But on principle,
it is quite wrong to try founding a theory on observable
magnitudes alone. In reality the very opposite happens. It is the
theory which decides what we can observe. You must appreciate
that observation is a very complicated process. The phenomenon
under observation produces certain events in our measuring
apparatus. As a result, further processes take place in the apparatus,
which eventually and by complicated paths produce sense
impressions and help us to fix the effects in our consciousness.
Along this whole path - from the phenomenon to its fixation in
our consciousness — we must be able to tell how nature functions,
must know the natural laws at least in practical terms, before we
can claim to have observed anything at all. Only theory, that is,
knowledge of natural laws, enables us to deduce the underlying
phenomena from our sense impressions. When we claim that we
can observe something new, we ought really to be saying that,
although we are about to formulate new natural laws that do not
agree with the old ones, we nevertheless assume that the existing
laws — covering the whole path from the phenomenon to our
consciousness—function in such a way that we can rely upon
them and hence speak of'observations'...Physics and Beyond (pg67)

(bold added by me for emphasis)

In truest sensibility of the individual then is to seek some relation as to what by nature allows such observance in consciousness, so as to be able too, make decisions. Then, as too, "covering the whole path from the phenomenon to our consciousness—function in such a way that we can rely upon them and hence speak of 'observations'. " Any new theory then has to have had a foundation(causal chains) with which it can move forward and built upon that experience. While I truly speak to the process of science so as to demonstrate Einstein's wording and ways, I am also speaking to the consciousness that uses this same information.

Cosmological observations show that the universe is very uniform on the maximally large scale accessible to our telescopes, and the same laws of physics operate in all of its parts that we can see now. The best theoretical explanation of the uniformity of our world was provided by inflationary theory, which was proposed 30 years ago.

Early visions of wireless power actually were thought of by Nikola Tesla basically about 100 years ago. The thought that you wouldn't want to transfer electric power wirelessly, no one ever thought of that. They thought, "Who would use it if you didn't?" And so, in fact, he actually set about doing a variety of things. Built the Tesla coil. This tower was built on Long Island back at the beginning of the 1900s. And the idea was, it was supposed to be able to transfer power anywhere on Earth. We'll never know if this stuff worked. Actually, I think the Federal Bureau of Investigation took it down for security purposes, sometime in the early 1900s.See: http://www.ted.com/talks/eric_giler_demos_wireless_electricity.html

I think people have been behind the times a bit here on what may have been a interesting proposal in order to help the recharging system. Think of Photosynthesis and then think of nano-particulates and you will see they are quite advanced in terms of using this proposal in a varied productive means and not just with solar panels. I know of companies using this approach in shingle application.

Nanocrystal solar: The solar
cells at top were made on a roll-to-roll printer from an ink consisting
of the rod-shaped inorganic semiconducting nanocrystals shown below.
The cells were printed on a flexible metal foil and will be topped with a
glass plate.
Credit: Solexant

Figure 3:Left: BICEP2 apodized E-mode and B-mode maps filtered to 50 < ℓ < 120. Right: The equivalent maps for the first of the lensed-ΛCDM+noise simulations. The color scale displays the E-mode scalar and B-mode
pseudoscalar patterns while the lines display the equivalent magnitude
and orientation of the linear polarization. Note that excess B-mode is detected over lensing+noise with high signal-to-noise ratio in the map (s/n > 2 per map mode at ℓ ≈ 70). (Also note that the E-mode and B-mode maps use different color/length scales.)

You know the distinctions on how one might see information as purported to exist as gravitational waves of course held my perspective. Like others, is this a way in which BICEP has illustrated something of the every nature of space-time, as to my thoughts then, when it really was only about seeing a footprint in the WMAP.

Gravitational waves open up a new window on the universe
that will allow us to probe events for which no electromagnetic
signature exists. In the next few years, the ground-based
interferometers GEO-600, LIGO, VIRGO and TAMA should be able to detect
the high-frequency gravitational waves produced by extreme astrophysical
objects, providing the first direct detection of these disturbances in
space–time. With its much longer arm lengths, the space-based
interferometer LISA will, if launched, be able to detect lower-frequency
gravitational waves, possibly those generated by phase transitions in
the early universe. At even lower frequencies, other experiments will
look for tiny signatures of gravitational waves in the cosmic microwave
background. Source: NASA.

So it is a footprint then and I might show some of those maps and ask what do these footprints show in the early universe as to say, that given the inflationary timeline what can be garnered about looking back so far as to suggest 13.8 billion years and have such an imprint hold relevance, and equal the very nature of space-time itself.

The nature of the question for me is a "sensor mode developmental model" that chooses to exemplify gravitational waves over another and I had to make this clear for myself. So you can see where this has lead me. To where I want to further understand. If you choose not to show a comment then I guess that is where I lose.

The analogy rests with how the nature of gravitational waves had been sounded so as to show a connection to the WMAP as a footprint. So you have this 2 dimensional map surface as to exemplary how gravitational waves may appear on it, yet, the visual extent of that correlation is representative to me of a defined configuration space. You need your physics in order to establish any correlation to the timeline of the inflationary model and to see that such a map reveals efforts to penetrate the Planck era. To suggest quantum gravity.

So indeed to have such a map is very telling to me not just of the imprint but also of the sensory mode we had chosen to illustrate that map of the B mode representation as a valid model description of that early universe.

Lithospheric Magnetic Anomalies. A modeled image of Earth's magnetic field variations created as a result of science satellites like Magsat. nT = nanoteslas. The color bar indicates areas with positive and negative magnetic fields.

Published on Oct 19, 2012
The Kitchener-Waterloo Symphony and the Institute for Quantum Computing teamed up on Sept. 29, 2012, to present an innovative musical experiment called "Quantum: Music at the Frontier of Science." The concert served as the the grand finale of the grand opening celebrations of the Mike & Ophelia Lazaridis Quantum-Nano Centre at the University of Waterloo. Through narration, an eclectic musical programme, live narration and "sound experiments," the concert explored the surprisingly parallel paths followed by quantum science and orchestral music over the past century. The concert was created over the period of a year through meetings and brainstorming sessions between KW Symphony Music Director Edwin Outwater and researchers from the Institute for Quantum Computing.

Thursday, April 03, 2014

Studious, meticulous, and
peculiarly-shaped, you are LHCb. As an introvert, you don't mind hiding
in forgotten corners of pseudo-rapidity that more "popular" experiments
ignore. Although your asymmetric features and reserved nature mean
you're commonly mistaken for a fixed-target experiment, you are
confident that your diligent, careful studies of CP violation will some
day allow you to conquer the world.