Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

x

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

Number of shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of May 7, 2012: 88,636,143.

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (the Company) was organized in the state of Maryland on August 10,
1993. The Company is a real estate investment trust (REIT) as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Company, we, us, and
our refer to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., First Industrial, L.P. and their other controlled subsidiaries. We refer to our operating partnership, First Industrial, L.P., as the Operating Partnership.

We began operations on July 1, 1994. Our operations are conducted primarily through the Operating Partnership, of which we are the
sole general partner with an approximate 94.4% ownership interest at March 31, 2012, and through our taxable REIT subsidiaries. We also conduct operations through other partnerships and limited liability companies, the operating data of which,
together with that of the Operating Partnership and the taxable REIT subsidiaries, is consolidated with that of the Company as presented herein. Noncontrolling interest at March 31, 2012 of approximately 5.6% represents the aggregate
partnership interest in the Operating Partnership held by the limited partners thereof.

We also own noncontrolling equity
interests in, and provide various services to, two joint ventures (the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture and the 2007 Europe Joint Venture and, collectively, the Joint Ventures). The Joint Ventures are accounted for
under the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the operating data of our Joint Ventures is not consolidated with that of the Company as presented herein. The 2007 Europe Joint Venture does not own any properties. See Note 4 for more
information on the Joint Ventures.

As of March 31, 2012, we owned 738 industrial properties located in 26 states in
the United States and one province in Canada, containing an aggregate of approximately 66.1 million square feet of gross leasable area (GLA).

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies
described in the financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (2011 Form 10-K) and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and related
notes. The 2011 year end consolidated balance sheet data included in this Form 10-Q filing was derived from the audited financial statements in our 2011 Form 10-K, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The following notes to these interim financial statements highlight significant changes to the notes included in the December 31, 2011 audited financial statements included in our
2011 Form 10-K and present interim disclosures as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In order to conform with GAAP, we, in preparation of our financial statements, are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and
2011. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of our financial position as of March 31, 2012 and
December 31, 2011, and the results of our operations and comprehensive income for each of the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and our cash flows for each of the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and all
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 includes $1,301 which should have been recorded as depreciation and
amortization expense during previous periods. Management evaluated this depreciation and amortization expense adjustment and believes it is not material to the results of the current quarter or projected annual results or any previous annual or
quarterly period.

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)Amendments
to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04 clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement requirements, changes certain principles related to
measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. Specifically, the guidance provides that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise in a fair value measurement are only relevant when measuring
the fair value of nonfinancial assets and are not relevant when measuring the fair value of financial assets and liabilities. Required disclosures are expanded under the new guidance, especially for fair value measurements that are categorized
within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, for which quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used, and a narrative description of the valuation processes in place and sensitivity of recurring Level 3 measurements to changes in
unobservable inputs are required. Entities are also required to disclose the categorization by level of the fair value hierarchy for items that are not measured at fair value in the balance sheet but for which the fair value is
required to be disclosed. ASU 2011-04 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and is to be applied prospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our
financial statements.

3. Investment in Real Estate

Acquisitions

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we acquired one industrial property comprising approximately 0.4 million square feet of GLA through the purchase of the 85% equity interest in one
property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture (see Note 4) and one land parcel.

The gross
agreed-upon fair value for the industrial property was $21,819, excluding costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition of the industrial property. The acquisition was funded through the assumption of a mortgage loan, which was subsequently
paid off on the date of acquisition and whose carrying value approximated fair market value, in the amount of $12,026 and a cash payment of $8,324 (85% of the net fair value of the acquisition). We accounted for this transaction as a step
acquisition utilizing the purchase method of accounting. Due to the change in control that occurred, we recorded a gain of approximately $776 related to the difference between our carrying value and fair value of our equity interest on the
acquisition date.

The purchase price of the land parcel was approximately $1,224, excluding costs incurred in conjunction
with the acquisition of the land parcel.

Intangible Assets (Liabilities) Subject to Amortization in the Period of Acquisition

The fair value at the date of acquisition of in-place leases, tenant relationships and below market leases recorded
due to the real estate property acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, which is recorded as deferred leasing intangibles, is as follows:

Three Months EndedMarch 31,2012

Three Months EndedMarch 31,2011

In-Place Leases

$

1,750

N/A

Tenant Relationships

$

1,012

N/A

Below Market Leases

$

(102

)

N/A

The weighted average life in months of in-place leases, tenant relationships and below market leases recorded at the
time of acquisition as a result of the real estate property acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Three Months EndedMarch 31,2012

Three Months EndedMarch 31,2011

In-Place Leases

118

N/A

Tenant Relationships

178

N/A

Below Market Leases

118

N/A

Sales and Discontinued Operations

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we sold three industrial properties comprising approximately 0.7 million square
feet of GLA. Gross proceeds from the sales of the three industrial properties were approximately $20,127. The gain on sale of real estate was approximately $6,199, all of which is shown in discontinued operations. The three sold industrial
properties meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations. Therefore the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the three industrial properties sold are included in discontinued operations.

At March 31, 2012, we had 15 industrial properties comprising approximately 2.7 million square feet of GLA and one land parcel
held for sale. The results of operations of the 15 industrial properties held for sale at March 31, 2012 are included in discontinued operations. There can be no assurance that such industrial properties or land parcel held for sale will be
sold.

Income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 reflects the results of operations
of the three industrial properties that were sold during the three months ended March 31, 2012, the results of operations of 36 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2011, the results of operations of the
15 industrial properties identified as held for sale at March 31, 2012 and the gain on sale of real estate relating to 13 industrial properties that were sold during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

The following table discloses certain information regarding the industrial properties included in our discontinued operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had notes receivable outstanding of
approximately $47,511 and $55,502, net of a discount of $303 and $319, respectively, which are included as a component of Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of the notes
receivable was $51,754 and $58,734, respectively. The fair value of our notes receivable was determined by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans with similar remaining maturities would be made to other
borrowers. The current market rates we utilized were internally estimated; therefore, we have concluded that our determination of fair value of our notes receivable was primarily based upon Level 3 inputs, as discussed below.

Impairment Charges

Fifteen industrial properties comprising approximately 2.7 million square feet of GLA and one land parcel comprising approximately 55.9 acres were classified as held for sale as of March 31,
2012. The net impairment charges for assets that qualify to be classified as held for sale at March 31, 2012 were calculated as the difference of the carrying value of the properties and land parcel over the fair value less costs to sell. On
the date an asset no longer qualifies to be classified as held for sale, the carrying value must be reestablished at the lower of the estimated fair market value of the asset or the carrying value of the asset prior to held for sale classification,
adjusted for any depreciation and amortization that would have been recorded if the asset had not been classified as held for sale. Catch-up depreciation and amortization has been recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2012, if
applicable, for certain assets that are no longer classified as held for sale. The net impairment charges recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2012 are due to updated fair market values for certain industrial properties whose
estimated fair market values have changed since December 31, 2011 and are either classified as held for sale at March 31, 2012 or were classified as held for sale at December 31, 2011, but no longer qualify to be classified as held
for sale at March 31, 2012.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, we recorded the following net
non-cash impairment charges:

Three MonthsEndedMarch 31,2012

Three MonthsEndedMarch 31,2011

Operating PropertiesHeld for Sale and Sold Assets

$

1,260

$

2,727

ImpairmentDiscontinued Operations

$

1,260

$

2,727

Land ParcelsHeld for Sale and Sold Assets

$



$



Operating PropertiesHeld for Use

(14

)

(2,184

)

Land ParcelsHeld for Use



(595

)

ImpairmentContinuing Operations

$

(14

)

$

(2,779

)

Total Net Impairment

$

1,246

$

(52

)

The guidance for the fair value measurement provisions for the impairment of long lived assets recorded at fair value
establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2, defined as
inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The fair market values were determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analyses using expected cash flows, internal valuations of real estate and third party offers.

For operational real estate assets, the most significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analyses included the discount
rate, projected occupancy levels, market rental rates, capital expenditures, and the terminal

capitalization rate. For the valuation of land parcels, we reviewed recent comparable sales transactions, to the extent available, or if not available, we considered older comparable
transactions, adjusted upward or downward to reflect managements assumptions about current market conditions. In all cases, members of our management team that were responsible for the individual markets where the land parcels were located
determined the internal valuations. Valuations based on third party offers include bona fide contract prices and letter of intent amounts that we believe are indicative of fair value.

The following tables present information about our assets that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three
months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The tables indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques we utilized to determine fair value.

Fair Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis Using:

Description

Three MonthsEndedMarch 31,2012

Quoted Prices inActive Markets forIdentical Assets(Level
1)

Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)

UnobservableInputs(Level 3)

TotalImpairment

Long-lived Assets Held for Sale*

$

20,470





$

20,470

$

(1,360

)

Long-lived Assets Held and Used*

$

16,290





$

16,290

(190

)

$

(1,550

)

Fair Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis Using:

Description

Three MonthsEndedMarch 31,2011

Quoted Prices inActive Markets forIdentical Assets(Level
1)

Significant OtherObservable Inputs(Level 2)

UnobservableInputs(Level 3)

TotalImpairment

Long-lived Assets Held for Sale**

$

42,945





$

42,945

$

(2,755

)

Long-lived Assets Held and Used**

$

95,120





$

95,120

1,894

$

(861

)

*

Excludes industrial properties for which an impairment reversal of $304 was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2012, since the related assets are
recorded at carrying value, which is lower than estimated fair value at March 31, 2012.

**

Excludes industrial properties and land parcels for which an impairment reversal of $913 was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2011, since the
related assets are recorded at carrying value, which is lower than estimated fair value at March 31, 2011.

The fair value for the properties is based upon the value of either a third party purchase contract or third party letters of intent, both of which are subject to our
corroboration for reasonableness. Certain of the properties are included in portfolios whereby the letter of intent pricing relates to the respective portfolio. The estimated purchase price for the portfolio was allocated to the individual
properties within the portfolio based upon their relative fair value.

On February 13, 2012, we acquired the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the
2003 Net Lease Joint Venture (See Note 3).

At March 31, 2012, the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture owned six industrial
properties comprising approximately 3.1 million square feet of GLA. The 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture is considered a variable interest entity in accordance with the FASB guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities. However, we
continue to conclude that we are not the primary beneficiary of this venture. As of March 31, 2012, our investment in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture is $1,044. Our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our investment plus any future
contributions we make to the venture. We continue to hold our 10% equity interest in the 2007 Europe Joint Venture. As of March 31, 2012, the 2007 Europe Joint Venture did not own any properties.

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we have receivables from the Joint
Ventures (and/or our former Joint Venture partners) in the aggregate amount of $131 and $137, respectively. These receivable amounts are included in Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net. During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011,
we recognized fees of $76 and $310 from our Joint Ventures (and/or our former Joint Venture partners).

As of March 31, 2012, mortgage and other loans payable are collateralized by, and in some instances
cross-collateralized by, industrial properties with a net carrying value of $881,599 and one letter of credit in the amount of $537. We believe the Operating Partnership and the Company were in compliance with all covenants relating to mortgage and
other loans payable as of March 31, 2012.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we repurchased and retired the
following senior unsecured notes prior to maturity:

Principal AmountRepurchased

Purchase Price

2028 Notes

$

430

$

406

In connection with these repurchases prior to maturity, we recognized $1 as gain on retirement of debt for the three
months ended March 31, 2012, which is the difference between the repurchase price of $406 and the principal amount retired of $430, net of the pro rata write off of the unamortized debt issue discount, the unamortized loan fees and the
unamortized settlement amount of the interest rate protection agreements related to the repurchases of $0, $3 and $20, respectively.

The following is a schedule of the stated maturities and scheduled principal payments as of
March 31, 2012 of our indebtedness, exclusive of premiums and discounts, for the next five years ending December 31, and thereafter:

Amount

Remainder of 2012

$

71,417

2013

13,164

2014

271,063

2015

62,088

2016

293,467

Thereafter

735,073

Total

$

1,446,272

Our unsecured credit facility (as amended, the Unsecured Credit Facility) and the indentures governing our
senior unsecured notes contain certain financial covenants, including limitations on incurrence of debt and debt service coverage. Under the Unsecured Credit Facility, an event of default can occur if the lenders, in their good faith judgment,
determine that a material adverse change has occurred which could prevent timely repayment or materially impair our ability to perform our obligations under the loan agreement. We believe that we were in compliance with all covenants as of
March 31, 2012. However, these financial covenants are complex and there can be no assurance that these provisions would not be interpreted by our noteholders or lenders in a manner that could impose and cause us to incur material costs.

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair values of our indebtedness were as follows:

March 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

CarryingAmount

FairValue

CarryingAmount

FairValue

Mortgage and Other Loans Payable, Net

$

687,139

$

754,110

$

690,256

$

743,419

Senior Unsecured Notes, Net

640,182

639,824

640,227

630,622

Unsecured Credit Facility

115,000

115,000

149,000

149,000

Total

$

1,442,321

$

1,508,934

$

1,479,483

$

1,523,041

The fair values of our mortgage and other loans payable were determined by discounting the future cash flows using the
current rates at which similar loans would be made based upon similar leverage levels and similar remaining maturities. The current market rates we utilized were internally estimated; therefore, we have concluded that our determination of fair value
for our mortgage and other loans payable was primarily based upon Level 3 inputs. The fair value of the senior unsecured notes was determined by quoted market prices (Level 1) or, for certain senior unsecured notes that are thinly traded, were based
upon transactions for senior unsecured notes with comparable maturities (Level 2). The fair value of the Unsecured Credit Facility was determined by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to
borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining term, assuming no repayment until maturity. The current market rate utilized for our Unsecured Credit Facility was internally estimated; therefore, we have concluded that our
determination of fair value was primarily based upon Level 3 inputs.

On March 1, 2012, we entered into distribution agreements with sales agents to sell up to 12,500,000 shares of the
Companys common stock, for up to $125,000 aggregate gross sale proceeds, from time to time in at-the-market offerings (the ATM). During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we issued 1,532,598 shares of the
Companys common stock under the ATM at a weighted average sale price of $12.03 resulting in net proceeds to us of approximately $18,063, net of $369 paid to the sales agent. Under the terms of the ATM, sales are to be made primarily in
transactions that are deemed to be at-the-market offerings, including sales made directly on the New York Stock Exchange or sales made through a market maker other than on an exchange or by privately negotiated transactions.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, 11,159 limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (Units)
were converted into an equivalent number of shares of common stock, resulting in a reclassification of $99 of Noncontrolling Interest to First Industrial Realty Trust Inc.s Stockholders Equity.

The following table summarizes the changes in Noncontrolling Interest for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, we awarded 365,137 and 292,339 shares, respectively, of restricted common stock to certain employees. The restricted common stock had a
fair value of approximately $4,327 and $3,248, respectively, on the date of approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The restricted common stock vests over a three year period. Compensation expense will be charged to
earnings over the vesting period for the shares expected to vest.

We recognized $1,099 and $645 for the three months ended
March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, in compensation expense related to restricted stock/unit awards. At March 31, 2012, we have $8,307 in unrecognized compensation related to unvested restricted stock/unit awards. The weighted average
period that the unrecognized compensation is expected to be recognized is 1.05 years.

The coupon rate of our Series F Preferred Stock resets every quarter at 2.375% plus the greater of (i) the
30 year Treasury constant maturity treasury (CMT) Rate, (ii) the 10 year Treasury CMT Rate or (iii) 3 month LIBOR. For the first quarter of 2012, the new coupon rate was 5.415%. See Note 9 for additional
derivative information related to the Series F Preferred Stock coupon rate reset.

Loss from Continuing Operations Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.s Common Stockholders

$

(9,051

)

$

(10,672

)

Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax Provision

$

5,885

$

2,167

Noncontrolling Interest Allocable to Discontinued Operations

(334

)

(152

)

Income from Discontinued Operations Attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.

$

5,551

$

2,015

Net Loss Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.s Common Stockholders and Participating Securities

$

(3,500

)

$

(8,657

)

Denominator:

Weighted Average SharesBasic and Diluted

86,575,197

70,638,598

Basic and Diluted EPS:

Loss from Continuing Operations Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.s Common Stockholders

$

(0.10

)

$

(0.15

)

Income from Discontinued Operations Attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.s Common
Stockholders

$

0.06

$

0.03

Net Loss Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.s Common Stockholders and Participating Securities

$

(0.04

)

$

(0.12

)

Participating securities include 756,815 and 696,360 of unvested restricted stock awards outstanding at March 31,
2012 and 2011, respectively, which participate in non-forfeitable dividends of the Company. Participating security holders are not obligated to share in losses, therefore, none of the net loss attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. was
allocated to participating securities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

The number of weighted average
sharesdiluted is the same as the number of weighted average sharesbasic for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 as the effect of stock options and restricted stock unit awards (that do not participate in non-forfeitable
dividends of the Company) was excluded as its inclusion would have been antidilutive to the loss from continuing operations available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.s common stockholders. The following awards were anti-dilutive and
could be dilutive in future periods:

Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our cash flow
volatility and exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of
variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

Our Series F Preferred Stock is subject to a coupon rate reset. The coupon rate resets every quarter at 2.375% plus the greater of i) the 30 year Treasury CMT Rate, ii) the 10 year
Treasury CMT Rate or iii) 3 month LIBOR. For the first quarter of 2012, the new coupon rate was 5.415% (see Note 6). In October 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $50,000 to mitigate our exposure
to floating interest rates related to the forecasted reset rate of the coupon rate of our Series F Preferred Stock (the Series F Agreement). This Series F Agreement fixes the 30 year Treasury CMT rate at 5.2175%.
Accounting guidance for derivatives does not permit hedge accounting treatment related to equity instruments and therefore the mark to market gains or losses related to this agreement are recorded in the statement of operations. For the three months
ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, gains of $124 and $44, respectively, are recognized as Mark-to-Market Gain on Interest Rate Protection Agreements. Quarterly payments are treated as a component of the mark to market gains or losses and for the
three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, totaled $292 and $99, respectively.

The effective portion of changes in the
fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) and is subsequently reclassified to earnings through interest expense over the life of the derivative or over the
life of the debt. In the next 12 months, we will amortize approximately $2,308 into net income by increasing interest expense for interest rate protection agreements we settled in previous periods.

The following is a summary of the terms of our derivatives and their fair values, which are included in Accounts Payable, Accrued
Expenses and Other Liabilities, Net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets:

Hedge Product

NotionalAmount

Strike

TradeDate

MaturityDate

Fair Value As
ofMarch 31,2012

Fair Value As
ofDecember 31,2011

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

Series F Agreement*

$

50,000

5.2175

%

October 2008

October 1, 2013

$

(1,251

)

$

(1,667

)

*

Fair value excludes quarterly settlement payment due on Series F Agreement. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the outstanding payable was $292
and $280, respectively.

The following is a summary of the impact of the derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships on the statement of
operations and the statement of OCI for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

Interest Rate Products

Location on Statement

Three Months Ended

March 31,2012

March 31,2011

Amortization Reclassified from OCI into Income

Interest Expense

$

(540

)

$

(556

)

Our agreements with our derivative counterparties contain provisions where if we default on any of our indebtedness,
then we could also be declared in default on our derivative obligations subject to certain thresholds.

The guidance for fair
value measurement of financial instruments includes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable

inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3,
defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

The following table sets forth our financial liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Description

Fair Value

Fair Value Measurements atReporting
Date Using:

Quoted Prices inActive
Markets forIdentical Assets(Level 1)

Significant OtherObservable
Inputs(Level 2)

UnobservableInputs(Level 3)

Liabilities:

Series F Agreement at March 31, 2012

$

(1,251

)





$

(1,251

)

Series F Agreement at December 31, 2011

$

(1,667

)





$

(1,667

)

The following table presents the quantitative information about the Level 3 fair value measurements at March 31,
2012.

The valuation of the Series F Agreement is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted
cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the instrument. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the agreements including the period to maturity. In adjusting the fair value of the interest rate protection agreements for the effect
of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements. To comply with the provisions of fair value measurement, we incorporated a credit valuation adjustment (CVA) to appropriately
reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. However, assessing significance of inputs is a matter of judgment that should consider a variety of factors. One
factor we consider is the CVA and its materiality to the overall valuation of the derivatives on the balance sheet and to their related changes in fair value. We consider the Series F Agreement to be classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy
due to a significant number of unobservable inputs. The Series F Agreement swaps a fixed rate of 5.2175% for floating rate payments based on 30 year Treasury CMT rate. No market observable prices exist for long dated Treasuries. Therefore, we have
classified the Series F Agreement in its entirety as Level 3.

The following table presents a reconciliation of our
liabilities classified as Level 3 at March 31, 2012:

In the normal course of business, we are involved in legal actions arising from the ownership of our industrial
properties. In our opinion, the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions are not expected to have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, operations or liquidity.

From April 1, 2012 to May 7, 2012, we sold four industrial properties for approximately $3,750. There were no
industrial properties acquired during this period.

On April 16, 2012, we paid off and retired our 2012 Notes, at
maturity, in the amount of $61,829.

On March 29, 2012, we announced a cash tender offer to purchase up to an aggregate of
$100,000 of our 2014 Notes, 2027 Notes, 2028 Notes and 2032 Notes. The early tender period ended on April 11, 2012 and the extended tender offer period expired on April 25, 2012. During the early and extended tender offer periods, we purchased
$9,000 of our 2014 Notes, $55,525 of our 2028 Notes and $22,400 of our 2032 Notes for total consideration of $88,922. The early tender premium along with the write off of unamortized loan fees and the unamortized settlement amount of the interest
rate protection agreements, as well as third party transaction costs, will be recognized as a loss on retirement of debt during the three months ended June 30, 2012.

On August 24, 2009, we received a private letter ruling from the IRS granting favorable loss treatment under Sections 331 and 336 of the Code on the tax liquidation of one of our old taxable
REIT subsidiaries. On November 6, 2009, legislation was signed that allowed businesses with net operating losses for 2008 or 2009 to carry back those losses for up to five years. As a result, we received a refund from the IRS of $40,418 in the
fourth quarter of 2009 (the Refund) in connection with this tax liquidation. The IRS examination team, which is required by statute to review all refund claims in excess of $2,000 on behalf of the Joint Committee on Taxation, has
indicated to us, on a preliminary basis, that it disagrees with certain of the property valuations we obtained from an independent valuation expert in support of our fair value of the liquidated taxable REIT subsidiary and our claim for the Refund.
If we are unable to agree with the IRS on valuation, we expect the IRS to formally propose an adjustment. While we would need to evaluate any proposed adjustment, we currently intend to contest any proposed adjustment, and there can be no assurance
that we would succeed. If the IRS succeeds in asserting any amount of a proposed adjustment, then our tax loss and the Refund would be reduced accordingly and, as a result, we would owe some amount of taxes, interest and possible penalties to the
relevant taxing authorities, which we expect not to exceed the amount of the Refund in any event. The amount of loss, if any, which we may incur upon resolution with the IRS is not estimable at this time.

Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

This report contains certain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor
provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on
certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company, are generally identifiable by use of the words believe, expect, intend, anticipate, estimate,
project, seek, target, potential, focus, may, should, or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is
inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a materially adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to: changes in national, international, regional and local economic conditions generally and real estate
markets specifically; changes in legislation/regulation (including changes to laws governing the taxation of real estate investment trusts) and actions of regulatory authorities (including the Internal Revenue Service); our ability to qualify and
maintain our status as a real estate investment trust; the availability and attractiveness of financing (including both public and private capital) to us and to our potential counterparties; the availability and attractiveness of terms of additional
debt repurchases; interest rates; our credit agency ratings; our ability to comply with applicable financial covenants; competition; changes in supply and demand for industrial properties (including land, the supply and demand for which is
inherently more volatile than other types of industrial property) in the Companys current and proposed market areas; difficulties in consummating acquisitions and dispositions; risks related to our investments in properties through joint
ventures; environmental liabilities; slippages in development or lease-up schedules; tenant creditworthiness; higher-than-expected costs; changes in asset valuations and related impairment charges; changes in general accounting principles, policies
and guidelines applicable to real estate investment trusts; international business risks and those additional factors described under the heading Risk Factors and elsewhere in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2011 (2011 Form 10-K), and in this quarterly report. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the
dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Company, we, us, and our refer to First
Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., First Industrial, L.P. and their controlled subsidiaries. We refer to our operating partnership, First Industrial, L.P., as the Operating Partnership.

The Company was organized in the state of Maryland on August 10, 1993. We are a real estate investment trust (REIT) as
defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). We began operations on July 1, 1994. Our interests in our properties and land parcels are held through partnerships, corporations, and limited liability companies controlled,
directly or indirectly, by the Company, including the Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner with an approximate 94.4% ownership interest at March 31, 2012, and through our taxable REIT subsidiaries. We also conduct
operations through other partnerships and limited liability companies, the operating data of which, together with that of the Operating Partnership and the taxable REIT subsidiaries, is consolidated with that of the Company as presented herein.
Noncontrolling interest at March 31, 2012 of approximately 5.6% represents the aggregate partnership interest in the Operating Partnership held by the limited partners thereof.

We also own noncontrolling equity interests in, and provide services to, two joint ventures (the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture
and the 2007 Europe Joint Venture and, collectively, the Joint Ventures). The Joint Ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the operating data of our Joint

Ventures is not consolidated with that of the Company as presented herein. The 2007 Europe Joint Venture does not own any properties. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information on the Joint Ventures.

As of March 31, 2012, we owned 738 industrial properties located in
26 states in the United States and one province in Canada, containing an aggregate of approximately 66.1 million square feet of gross leasable area (GLA).

We maintain a website at www.firstindustrial.com. Information on this website shall not constitute part of this Form 10-Q. Copies of
our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports are available without charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with
or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee
Charter, along with supplemental financial and operating information prepared by us, are all available without charge on our website or upon request to us. Amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply to our
executive officers or directors will also be posted to our website. We also post or otherwise make available on our website from time to time other information that may be of interest to our investors. Please direct requests as follows:

We believe our financial condition and results
of operations are, primarily, a function of our performance in four key areas: leasing of industrial properties, acquisition and development of additional industrial properties, disposition of industrial properties and access to external capital.

We generate revenue primarily from rental income and tenant recoveries from long-term (generally three to six years)
operating leases of our industrial properties. Such revenue is offset by certain property specific operating expenses, such as real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management, utilities and insurance expenses, along with certain
other costs and expenses, such as depreciation and amortization costs and general and administrative and interest expenses. Our revenue growth is dependent, in part, on our ability to (i) increase rental income, through increasing either or
both occupancy rates and rental rates at our properties, (ii) maximize tenant recoveries and (iii) minimize operating and certain other expenses. Revenues generated from rental income and tenant recoveries are a significant source of
funds, in addition to proceeds generated from gains/losses on the sale of our properties (as discussed below), for our liquidity. The leasing of property, in general, and occupancy rates, rental rates, operating expenses and certain non-operating
expenses, in particular, are impacted, variously, by property specific, market specific, general economic and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. The leasing of property also entails various risks, including the risk of tenant
default. If we were unable to maintain or increase occupancy rates and rental rates at our properties or to maintain tenant recoveries and operating and certain other expenses consistent with historical levels and proportions, our revenue would
decline. Further, if a significant number of our tenants were unable to pay rent (including tenant recoveries) or if we were unable to rent our properties on favorable terms, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to
pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock would be adversely affected.

Our revenue growth is also
dependent, in part, on our ability to acquire existing, and acquire and develop new, additional industrial properties on favorable terms. The Company seeks to identify opportunities to acquire existing industrial properties on favorable terms, and,
when conditions permit, also seeks to identify

opportunities to acquire and develop new industrial properties on favorable terms. Existing properties, as they are acquired, and acquired and developed properties, as they are leased, generate
revenue from rental income, tenant recoveries and fees, income from which, as discussed above, is a source of funds for our distributions. The acquisition and development of properties is impacted, variously, by property specific, market specific,
general economic and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. The acquisition and development of properties also entails various risks, including the risk that our investments may not perform as expected. For example, acquired
existing and acquired and developed new properties may not sustain and/or achieve anticipated occupancy and rental rate levels. With respect to acquired and developed new properties, we may not be able to complete construction on schedule or within
budget, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs and delays in leasing the properties. Also, we face significant competition for attractive acquisition and development opportunities from other well-capitalized real estate
investors, including both publicly-traded REITs and private investors. Further, as discussed below, we may not be able to finance the acquisition and development opportunities we identify. If we were unable to acquire and develop sufficient
additional properties on favorable terms, or if such investments did not perform as expected, our revenue growth would be limited and our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of,
our common stock would be adversely affected.

We also generate income from the sale of our properties (including existing
buildings, buildings which we have developed or re-developed on a merchant basis and land). The gain/loss on, and fees from, the sale of such properties are included in our income and can be a significant source of funds, in addition to revenues
generated from rental income and tenant recoveries, for our operations. Currently, a significant portion of our proceeds from sales are being used to repay outstanding debt. Market conditions permitting, however, a portion of our proceeds from such
sales may be used to fund the acquisition of existing, and the acquisition and development of new, industrial properties. The sale of properties is impacted, variously, by property specific, market specific, general economic and other conditions,
many of which are beyond our control. The sale of properties also entails various risks, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties. Further, our ability to sell
properties is limited by safe harbor rules applying to REITs under the Code which relate to the number of properties that may be disposed of in a year, their tax bases and the cost of improvements made to the properties, along with other tests which
enable a REIT to avoid punitive taxation on the sale of assets. If we were unable to sell properties on favorable terms, our income growth would be limited and our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends
on, and the market price of, our common stock would be adversely affected.

We utilize a portion of the net sales proceeds
from property sales, borrowings under our unsecured credit facility (the Unsecured Credit Facility) and proceeds from the issuance, when and as warranted, of additional debt and equity securities to refinance debt and finance future
acquisitions and developments. Access to external capital on favorable terms plays a key role in our financial condition and results of operations, as it impacts our cost of capital and our ability and cost to refinance existing indebtedness as it
matures and to fund acquisitions and developments or through the issuance, when and as warranted, of additional equity securities. Our ability to access external capital on favorable terms is dependent on various factors, including general market
conditions, interest rates, credit ratings on our preferred stock and debt, the markets perception of our growth potential, our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions and the market price of our capital stock. If we were
unable to access external capital on favorable terms, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock would be adversely affected.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Our net loss available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.s common stockholders and participating securities was $3.5 million and
$8.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Basic and diluted net loss available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.s common stockholders was $0.04 per share and $0.12 per share for the three
months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The tables below summarize our revenues, property expenses and depreciation and other
amortization by various categories for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Same store properties are properties owned prior to January 1, 2011 and held as an operating property through March 31, 2012 and developments and
redevelopments that were placed in service prior to January 1, 2011 or were substantially completed for the 12 months prior to January 1, 2011. Properties which are at least 75% occupied at acquisition are placed in service. All other
properties are placed in service as they reach the earlier of a) stabilized occupancy (generally defined as 90% occupied), or b) one year subsequent to acquisition or development completion. Acquired properties are properties that were
acquired subsequent to December 31, 2010 and held as an operating property through March 31, 2012. Sold properties are properties that were sold subsequent to December 31, 2010. (Re)Developments and land are land parcels and
developments and redevelopments that were not: a) substantially complete 12 months prior to January 1, 2011 or b) stabilized prior to January 1, 2011. Other revenues are derived from the operations of our maintenance
company, fees earned from our Joint Ventures and other miscellaneous revenues. Other expenses are derived from the operations of our maintenance company and other miscellaneous regional expenses.

Our future financial condition and results of operations, including rental revenues, may be impacted by the future acquisition and sale
of properties. Our future revenues and expenses may vary materially from historical rates.

For the three months ended
March 31, 2012 and 2011, the average occupancy rates of our same store properties were 86.0% and 85.1%, respectively.

Three Months EndedMarch 31,

2012

2011

$ Change

% Change

($ in 000s)

REVENUES

Same Store Properties

$

82,111

$

82,096

$

15

0.0

%

Acquired Properties

869



869



Sold Properties

386

2,683

(2,297

)

(85.6

)%

(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above

295

127

168

132.3

%

Other

1,273

1,433

(160

)

(11.2

)%

$

84,934

$

86,339

$

(1,405

)

(1.6

)%

Discontinued Operations

(1,848

)

(4,522

)

2,674

(59.1

)%

Total Revenues

$

83,086

$

81,817

$

1,269

1.6

%

Revenues from same store properties remained relatively unchanged. Revenues from acquired properties
increased $0.9 million due to the two industrial properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2010 totaling approximately 1.1 million square feet of GLA. Revenues from sold properties decreased $2.3 million due to the 39 industrial
properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2010 totaling approximately 3.6 million square feet of GLA. Revenues from (re)developments and land increased $0.2 million primarily due to an increase in occupancy. Other revenues remained
relatively unchanged.

Property expenses include real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management,
utilities, insurance and other property related expenses. Property expenses from same store properties decreased $2.2 million due primarily to a decrease in repairs and maintenance expense resulting from lower snow removal costs incurred due to
the mild 2012 winter. Property expenses from acquired properties increased $0.2 million due to properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2010. Property expenses from sold properties decreased $1.0 million due to properties sold
subsequent to December 31, 2010. Property expenses from (re)developments and land remained relatively unchanged. Other expense remained relatively unchanged.

General and administrative expense increased $0.3 million, or 6.6%, due primarily to an increase in incentive compensation expense partially offset by a decrease in rent expense resulting from a reduction
in office space during 2011.

For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we incurred $1.2 million in restructuring
charges to provide for costs associated with the termination of a certain office lease ($1.1 million) and other costs ($0.1 million) associated with implementing our restructuring plan.

For industrial properties that no longer qualify to be classified as held for sale, any impairment charge or reversal recorded during the
three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is reflected in continuing operations. Additionally, any impairment charge or reversal related to a land parcel, whether held for sale or held for use, is reflected in continuing operations. The
impairment reversal included in continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $0.01 million is primarily comprised of a reversal of impairment relating to certain industrial properties that no longer qualify for held for
sale classification. The impairment reversal included in continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of $2.8 million is primarily comprised of a reversal of impairment relating to certain industrial properties and land
parcels that no longer qualify for held for sale classification.

Three Months EndedMarch 31,

2012

2011

$ Change

% Change

($ in 000s)

DEPRECIATION AND OTHER AMORTIZATION

Same Store Properties

$

31,939

$

27,036

$

4,903

18.1

%

Acquired Properties

611



611



Sold Properties

63

814

(751

)

(92.3

)%

(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above

156

165

(9

)

(5.5

)%

Corporate Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment

300

405

(105

)

(25.9

)%

$

33,069

$

28,420

$

4,649

16.4

%

Discontinued Operations

(129

)

(864

)

735

(85.1

)%

Total Depreciation and Other Amortization

$

32,940

$

27,556

$

5,384

19.5

%

Depreciation and other amortization for same store properties increased $4.9 million primarily due to
depreciation taken for properties that were classified as held for sale in 2011 but no longer classified as held for sale in 2012. Depreciation and other amortization from acquired properties increased $0.6 million due to properties acquired
subsequent to December 31, 2010. Depreciation and other amortization from sold properties decreased $0.8 million due to properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2010. Depreciation and other amortization for (re)developments and land and
other remained relatively unchanged. Corporate furniture, fixtures and equipment depreciation expense remained relatively unchanged.

Interest income remained relatively unchanged.

Interest expense, inclusive of $0
million and $0.1 million of interest expense included in discontinued operations, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, decreased $4.1 million, or 15.3%, primarily due to a decrease in the weighted average debt
balance outstanding for the three months ended

March 31, 2012 ($1,502.4 million) as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 ($1,712.8 million), an increase in capitalized interest for the three months ended
March 31, 2012 due to an increase in development activities and a decrease in the weighted average interest rate for the three months ended March 31, 2012 (6.18%), as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 (6.35%).

Amortization of deferred financing costs decreased $0.2 million, or 19.4%, due primarily to the write off of financing costs
related to the replacement of our previous credit facility with the Unsecured Credit Facility in December 2011, the early retirement of certain mortgage loans and the repurchase and retirement of certain of our senior unsecured notes, partially
offset by the costs associated with the origination of mortgage financings during 2011.

In October 2008, we entered into an
interest rate swap agreement (the Series F Agreement) to mitigate our exposure to floating interest rates related to the coupon reset of the Companys Series F Preferred Stock. The Series F Agreement has a notional
value of $50.0 million and is effective from April 1, 2009 through October 1, 2013. The Series F Agreement fixes the 30 year Treasury constant maturity treasury (CMT) rate at 5.2175%. We recorded $0.1 million in
mark to market gain, inclusive of $0.3 million in swap payments, which is included in Mark-to-Market Gain on Interest Rate Protection Agreements for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to $0.04 million in mark to market
gain, inclusive of $0.1 million in swap payments, for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

For the three months ended
March 31, 2012, we recognized a net gain from retirement of debt of $0.001 million due to the partial repurchase of a certain series of our senior unsecured notes. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recognized a net
loss from retirement of debt of $1.0 million due to prepayment penalties and the write off of unamortized loan costs associated with the early payoff of certain mortgage loans.

Equity in Income of Joint Ventures remained relatively unchanged.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, Gain on Change in Control of Interests relates to the acquisition of the 85% equity
interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. The $0.8 million gain is the difference between our carrying value and fair value of our equity interest on the acquisition date.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recorded an income tax benefit of $0.1 million, as compared to an income tax
provision of $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The variance of $0.5 million is due primarily to a decrease in gain on sale of real estate in the taxable REIT subsidiaries.

The following table summarizes certain information regarding the industrial properties included in discontinued operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

Three Months EndedMarch 31,

2012

2011

($ in 000s)

Total Revenues

$

1,848

$

4,522

Property Expenses

(773

)

(1,996

)

Impairment of Real Estate

(1,260

)

(2,727

)

Depreciation and Amortization

(129

)

(864

)

Interest Expense



(63

)

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

6,199

3,804

Provision for Income Taxes



(509

)

Income from Discontinued Operations

$

5,885

$

2,167

Income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 reflects the results
of operations and gain on sale of real estate relating to three industrial properties that were sold during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and the results of operations of 15 industrial properties that were identified as held

for sale at March 31, 2012. The impairment loss for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $1.3 million relates to an impairment charge related to certain industrial properties that
were classified as held for sale at March 31, 2012.

Income from discontinued operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 reflects the gain on sale of real estate relating to 13 industrial properties that were sold during the three months ended March 31, 2011, the results of operations of 36 industrial properties that were sold during the year
ended December 31, 2011, the results of operations of three industrial properties that were sold during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and the results of operations of the 15 industrial properties identified as held for sale at
March 31, 2012. The impairment loss for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of $2.7 million relates to an impairment charge related to certain industrial properties that were either sold or classified as held for sale at March 31,
2012.

At March 31, 2012, our cash and cash equivalents was approximately $2.1 million. We also had $334.4 million available for additional borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility, subject
to certain restrictions.

We have considered our short-term (through March 31, 2013) liquidity needs and the adequacy of
our estimated cash flow from operations and other expected liquidity sources to meet these needs. Our 2012 Notes were paid off, at maturity, on April 16, 2012 in the amount of $61.8 million. We satisfied the payment obligations on the 2012 Notes
with borrowings on our Unsecured Credit Facility. See Subsequent Events. We believe that our principal short-term liquidity needs are to fund normal recurring expenses, property acquisitions, developments, renovations, expansions and other
nonrecurring capital improvements, debt service requirements and the minimum distributions required to maintain our REIT qualification under the Code. We anticipate that these needs will be met with cash flows provided by operating and investing
activities, including the disposition of select assets.

We expect to meet long-term (after March 31, 2013) liquidity
requirements such as property acquisitions, developments, scheduled debt maturities, major renovations, expansions and other nonrecurring capital improvements through the disposition of select assets, long-term unsecured and secured indebtedness and
the issuance of additional equity securities, subject to market conditions.

We also have financed the development or
acquisition of additional properties through borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility and may finance the development or acquisition of additional properties through such borrowings, to the extent capacity is available, in the future. At
March 31, 2012, borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility bore interest at a weighted average interest rate of 2.342%. As of May 7, 2012, we had approximately $168.4 million available for additional borrowings under our Unsecured
Credit Facility, subject to certain restrictions. Our Unsecured Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants including limitations on incurrence of debt and debt service coverage. Our access to borrowings may be limited if we fail to meet
any of these covenants. We believe that we were in compliance with our financial covenants as of March 31, 2012, and we anticipate that we will be able to operate in compliance with our financial covenants for the remainder of 2012.

Our senior unsecured notes have been assigned credit ratings from Standard & Poors, Moodys and Fitch Ratings of
BB-/Ba3/BB, respectively. In the event of a downgrade, we believe we would continue to have access to sufficient capital; however, our cost of borrowing would increase and our ability to access certain financial markets may be limited.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Net cash provided by operating activities of approximately $30.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was comprised primarily of the non-cash adjustments of approximately $29.1 million
and net income of approximately $1.1 million. The adjustments for the non-cash items of approximately $29.1 million

are primarily comprised of depreciation and amortization of approximately $36.0 million, the impairment of real estate of $1.2 million and the provision for bad debt of approximately $0.2 million
offset by the mark to market gain related to the Series F Agreement of approximately $0.1 million, the gain on sale of real estate of approximately $6.2 million, the gain on the change in control of interests in connection with the purchase of the
85% equity interest in one property from the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture of approximately $0.8 million, equity in income of our Joint Ventures of $0.1 million and the effect of the straight-lining of rental income of approximately $1.1 million.

Net cash used in investing activities of approximately $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was
comprised primarily of the acquisition of one property and one land parcel, the development of real estate, capital expenditures related to the improvement of existing real estate and payments related to leasing activities, offset by the net
proceeds from the sale of real estate and the repayments on our mortgage notes receivable.

During the three months ended
March 31, 2012, we sold three industrial properties comprising approximately 0.7 million square feet of GLA. Proceeds from the sales of the three industrial properties, net of closing costs, were approximately $19.5 million.
We are in various stages of discussions with third parties for the sale of additional properties and plan to continue to selectively market other properties for sale for the remainder of 2012.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we acquired one industrial property comprising approximately 0.4 million square
feet of GLA through the purchase of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. The acquisition was funded with a cash payment of $8.3 million and the assumption of a mortgage loan in
the amount of $12.0 million, which was subsequently paid off on the date of acquisition. We also acquired one land parcel. The purchase price of this acquisition totaled approximately $1.2 million, excluding costs incurred in conjunction with
the acquisition of this land parcel.

Net cash used in financing activities of approximately $36.9 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2012 was comprised primarily of repayments on our senior unsecured notes and mortgage and other loans payable, payments of debt and equity issuance costs, net repayments on our Unsecured Credit Facility, preferred stock
dividends, the repurchase and retirement of restricted stock and payments on the interest rate swap agreement offset by the net proceeds from the issuance of common stock.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we repurchased $0.4 million of our unsecured notes at an aggregate purchase price of $0.4 million. We may from time to time repay additional amounts
of our outstanding debt. Any repayments would depend upon prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors we consider important. Future repayments may materially impact our liquidity, taxable
income and results of operations.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we issued 1,532,598 shares of the
Companys common stock in at-the-market offerings, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $18.1 million. We may access the equity markets again, subject to contractual restrictions and market conditions. To the extent additional
equity offerings occur, we expect to use at least a portion of the proceeds received to reduce our indebtedness or fund property acquisitions.

The
following discussion about our risk-management activities includes forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Our
business subjects us to market risk from interest rates, and to a much lesser extent, foreign currency fluctuations.

This analysis presents the hypothetical gain or loss in earnings, cash flows or fair value of the financial instruments and derivative instruments which are held by us at March 31, 2012 that are
sensitive to changes in the interest rates. While this analysis may have some use as a benchmark, it should not be viewed as a forecast.

In the normal course of business, we also face risks that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include credit risk and legal risk and are not represented in the following
analysis.

At March 31, 2012, approximately $1,327.3 million (approximately 92.0% of total debt at March 31,
2012) of our debt was fixed rate debt and approximately $115.0 million (approximately 8.0% of total debt at March 31, 2012) was variable rate debt. Currently, we do not enter into financial instruments for trading or other
speculative purposes.

For fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value of the debt, but not our
earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for variable rate debt, changes in the base interest rate used to calculate the all-in interest rate generally do not impact the fair value of the debt, but would affect our future earnings and cash flows. The
interest rate risk and changes in fair market value of fixed rate debt generally do not have a significant impact on us until we are required to refinance such debt. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the
maturity dates of our various fixed rate debt.

Based upon the amount of variable rate debt outstanding at March 31,
2012, a 10% increase or decrease in the interest rate on our variable rate debt would decrease or increase, respectively, future net income and cash flows by approximately $0.3 million per year. The foregoing calculation assumes an
instantaneous increase or decrease in the rates applicable to the amount of borrowings outstanding under our Unsecured Credit Facility at March 31, 2012. Changes in LIBOR could result in a greater than 10% increase to such rates. In addition,
the calculation does not account for our option to elect the lower of two different interest rates under our borrowings or other possible actions, such as prepayment, that we might take in response to any rate increase.

The use of derivative financial instruments allows us to manage risks of increases in interest rates with respect to the effect these
fluctuations would have on our earnings and cash flows. As of March 31, 2012, we had one outstanding derivative with a notional amount of $50.0 million which mitigates our exposure to floating interest rates related to the reset rate of
our Series F Preferred Stock (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Owning, operating and developing industrial property outside of the United States exposes us to the possibility of
volatile movements in foreign exchange rates. Changes in foreign currencies can affect the operating results of international operations reported in U.S. dollars and the value of the foreign assets reported in U.S. dollars. The economic
impact of foreign exchange rate movements is complex because such changes are often linked to variability in real growth, inflation, interest rates, governmental actions and other factors. At March 31, 2012, we owned one land parcel for which
the U.S. dollar was not the functional currency. The land parcel is located in Ontario, Canada and uses the Canadian dollar as its functional currency.

Supplemental Earnings Measure

Investors in and industry analysts following
the real estate industry utilize funds from operations (FFO) as a supplemental operating performance measure of an equity REIT. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (GAAP) implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time through depreciation. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market
conditions, many industry analysts and investors prefer to supplement operating results that use historical cost accounting. The National Association

of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) created FFO as a supplemental measure of REIT operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation, among other items, from net
income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure. FFO available to common stockholders and participating securities should not be considered as a substitute for its most comparable GAAP measure, net income (loss)
available to common stockholders and participating securities, or any other measures derived in accordance with GAAP. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an
alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. FFO is calculated by us in accordance with the definition
adopted by the Board of Governors of NAREIT and therefore may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

Management believes that the use of FFO available to common stockholders and participating securities, combined with net income (loss) (which remains the primary measure of performance), improves the
understanding of operating results of REITs among the investing public and makes comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. Management believes that, by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated real estate
assets, real estate asset depreciation and amortization and impairment charges (reversals) recorded on depreciable real estate, investors and analysts are able to identify the operating results of the long-term assets that form the core of a
REITs activity and assist in comparing these operating results between periods or to those of different companies.

The
following table shows a reconciliation of net income (loss) available to common stockholders and participating securities to the calculation of FFO available to common stockholders and participating securities for the three months ended
March 31, 2012 and 2011.

Three Months Ended March 31,

2012

2011

(In thousands)

Net Loss Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.s Common Stockholders and Participating Securities

$

(3,500

)

$

(8,657

)

Adjustments:

Depreciation and Other Amortization of Real Estate

32,640

27,151

Depreciation and Other Amortization of Real Estate Included in Discontinued Operations

129

864

Company Share of Joint Venture Depreciation and Other Amortization

90

188

Impairment of Depreciated Real Estate

(14

)

(2,184

)

Impairment of Depreciated Real Estate Included in Discontinued Operations

1,260

2,727

Gain on Sale of Depreciated Real Estate

(6,199

)

(3,804

)

Company Share of Joint Venture Gain on Sale of Depreciated Real Estate

(56

)



Gain on Change in Control of Interests

(776

)

Noncontrolling Interest Share of Adjustments

(1,532

)

(1,747

)

Funds from Operations Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.s Common Stockholders and Participating
Securities

On April 16, 2012, we paid off and retired our 2012 Notes, at maturity, in the amount
of $61.8 million.

On March 29, 2012, we announced a cash tender offer to purchase up to an aggregate of $100.0 million of our
2014 Notes, 2027 Notes, 2028 Notes and 2032 Notes. The early tender period ended on April 11, 2012 and the extended tender offer period expired on April 25, 2012. During the early and extended tender offer periods, we purchased $9.0 million of our
2014 Notes, $55.5 million of our 2028 Notes and $22.4 million of our 2032 Notes for total consideration of $88.9 million. The early tender premium along with the write off of unamortized loan fees and the unamortized settlement amount of the
interest rate protection agreements, as well as third party transaction costs, will be recognized as a loss on retirement of debt during the three months ended June 30, 2012.

On August 24, 2009, we received a private letter ruling from the IRS granting favorable loss treatment under Sections 331 and 336 of the Code on the tax liquidation of one of our old taxable
REIT subsidiaries. On November 6, 2009, legislation was signed that allowed businesses with net operating losses for 2008 or 2009 to carry back those losses for up to five years. As a result, we received a refund from the IRS of $40.4 million
in the fourth quarter of 2009 (the Refund) in connection with this tax liquidation. The IRS examination team, which is required by statute to review all refund claims in excess of $2 million on behalf of the Joint Committee on Taxation,
has indicated to us, on a preliminary basis, that it disagrees with certain of the property valuations we obtained from an independent valuation expert in support of our fair value of the liquidated taxable REIT subsidiary and our claim for the
Refund. If we are unable to agree with the IRS on valuation, we expect the IRS to formally propose an adjustment. While we would need to evaluate any proposed adjustment, we currently intend to contest any proposed adjustment, and there can be no
assurance that we would succeed. If the IRS succeeds in asserting any amount of a proposed adjustment, then our tax loss and the Refund would be reduced accordingly and, as a result, we would owe some amount of taxes, interest and possible penalties
to the relevant taxing authorities, which we expect not to exceed the amount of the Refund in any event. The amount of loss, if any, which we may incur upon resolution with the IRS is not estimable at this time.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Response to this item is included in Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations above.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, in evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b), have concluded that as of the end of such period our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Distribution Agreement among the Company, First Industrial, L.P. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC dated March 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of
the Company filed March 2, 2012, File No. 1-13102).

31.1*

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2*

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1**

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Distribution Agreement among the Company, First Industrial, L.P. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC dated March 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of
the Company filed March 2, 2012, File No. 1-13102).

31.1*

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2*

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1**

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.