Since its a quiet holiday Monday, how about some Greenspan-related fun:

A stunningly revealing interview that Jon Stewart conducted with Easy Al on the 9/18 “Daily Show." It’s telling that the most of the media (and Wall Street) are ignoring Easy Al’s answers.

Easy Al admits to Jon Stewart:

1) Excess money causes inflation. 2) Fed easy credit favors stock market operators at the expense of savers. 3) The Fed believes that the market trades more on perception of what the Fed is or will do instead of the actual policies. 4) The Fed must make the market perceive that the system is sound. 5) The presence of the Fed guarantees there is no ‘free market’. 6) He still can’t forecast the economy or whether there is a bubble or too much exuberance.

Stewart: (after Greenspan’s explanation that the market moves on expectations of the Fed move, not the fundamentals of it) So the Fed, or whoever’s leading it, if they wanted to could in fact “goof” on all of us…

Greenspan: (smiles) You wouldn’t want to.

Stewart: When you say “Open Market,” I always wonder… Why do we have a Fed? Wouldn’t the market take care of interest rates and all that? Why do we have someone adjusting rates if we are a free market society?

Greenspan: We didn’t need a central bank when we were on the Gold Standard . . . [Conspiracy theorists note- the Fed was created 20 years BEFORE we decoupled from the Gold Std] . . . people would buy and sell gold and the markets would do what the Fed does now. . . but by the 1930s most everybody in the world decided that the Gold Standard was strangling the economy and universally the Gold Standard was abandoned…you need somebody out there or some mechanism to determine how much money is out there because the amount of money in an economy relates to the amount of inflation…

Stewart: So we’re not a free market then – there is an invisible…a “benevolent” hand that touches us…

Greenspan: Absolutely, you are quite correct. To the extent that there is a central bank governing the amount of money in the system, that is not a Free Market, and most people call it regulation.

Stewart: When you lower interest rates, it drives money to stocks and lowers the return people get on savings.

Greenspan: Yes, indeed.

Stewart: So they’ve made a choice – “We would like to favor those who invest in the stock market and not those who [save]”…

Greenspan: That’s the way it comes out, but that’s not the way we think about it.

Stewart: Explain that to me. It seems to me that we favor investment, but we don’t favor work. The vast majority of people work, they pay payroll taxes, and they use banks. And then there’s this whole other world of hedge funds and short betting… y’know, it seems like craps. And they keep saying, “No no no, don’t worry about it, it’s Free Market, that’s why we live in much bigger houses.” But it really is, it’s the Fed, or some other thing, no?

Greenspan: I think you’d better re-read my book.

Stewart: Am I wrong that we penalize work by not making the choice to…

Greenspan: No, what a sound money system does is to stabilize the elements in it and reduce the uncertainty that people confront, and when people confront uncertainty they withdraw and it reduces economic activity…

Stewart: So it’s all about perception then. It’s about making people believe the system is sound. If the stock market is high, people feel confident in spending, and if it lowers, they feel less confident?

Greenspan: Well…uh…I think you have to realize, there are certain aspects of human nature, which move exactly the way you defined it. The problem is, periodically we all go a little bit euphoric until we are assuming with confidence that everything is terrific, there will be no problems, nothing will ever happen, and then it dawns on us- NO!

Stewart: And then it goes the other way.

Greenspan: Exactly.

Stewart: Huge Fear.

Greenspan: I was telling my colleagues the other day…I’d been dealing with these big mathematical models for forecasting the economy, and I’m looking at what’s going on the last few weeks and I say, “Y’know, if I could figure out a way to determine whether or not people are more fearful, or changing to euphoric… I don’t need any of this other stuff. I could forecast the economy better than any way I know. The trouble is, we can’t figure that out. I’ve been in the forecasting business for 50 years, and I’m no better than I ever was, and nobody else is either.”

Stewart: (Leans back in chair)…You just bummed the sh*t outta me!

And here’s something I never thought I would type: Alan Greenspan on The Daily Show

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

30 Responses to “Alan Greenspan on The Daily Show”

I sure wish they would let “fear” run its course a little longer than they have been, because they are making this economy one big joke to the rest of the world. No! lets all just stop working and borrow and spend, borrow and spend, and spend!!!

I was watching Stewart that night and was in awe of the number he did on Greenspan. He is head and shoulders about the shills on cable television. I was surprised that Greenspan went on the show… and am not surprised that the answers he gave Stewart have not been more widely discussed.

Without taking into account the p-s-y-c-h-o-l-o-g-i-c-a-l aspects of policy, you may have reached a decision that would work in an adroid society, but that decision has little chance of success in a human-based world.

Ask Eclectic if this isn’t right – it isn’t so much what a computer model says about an econony’s money but how individuals p-e-r-c-e-i-v-e their individual money that creates actions.

bucky katt:
You are talking about Stewart’s appearance on Crossfire. He said that to Tucker Carlson. Isn’t it telling that Crossfire only lasted another week? Kinda funny that the two best appearances on Crossfire were Jon Stewart and Frank Zappa.

Yes, Jon Stewart is brilliant. A very funny guy, but give him just five minutes with Greenspan and he does a better job — more focused, pointed questions with much better follow-up — than any of the “serious” news mavens.

Wow, I am really surprised no one has picked up on this interview. That is about as candid as it can get. I suppose Wall Street has a vested interest in not making noises about this stuff. At some point the market could start a de facto gold standard because no one will be able to trust all the paper. I wish Hayek was alive.

i can’t believe all this waste of
cyber space for Greenspan.
Anybody here, if put in the position of
Bernanke or Greenspan, with any IQ above
1, would also be able to increase Money supply and cause inflation like they have done.

That feeling that tells me to keep my hands away from the hot stove. What a bad thing that is…and so wrong too. Isn’t it great that the fed has eliminated the fear of a hot market? Now I can rush in to a frothing market with confidence knowing the fed and the US taxpayer, saver and dollar holder will bail me out lest I get fearful

At some point the market could start a de facto gold standard because no one will be able to trust all the paper

shrek,

The market already has. How many people do you know that keep all their money in cash? Most people will transfer their money out of cash and into something of value the minute they get the cash. Either into RE, hard assets or stocks but they won’t keep it in cash. That indicates there is no confidence to keep their money in cash because they believe it will not hold its value or gain in value as it did pre-fed. bottom line assets are the defacto gold standard

Good posts, however, Cash is King. Backup by the bodygaurd of future mineral energy resources of the USA and Canada. I wouldn’t trust anything else, not the City Slicking Bernanke or Greenspan. Trust is earned, and they have not earned trust.
The Truth is Cash is King.

Its thesis runs contrary to Bernanke’s observation in his own Jackson Hole speech (the one I performed a head-to-toe autopsy on), because Bernanke correctly observed that monetary policy has lost much of its effectiveness in the monetary transmission mechanism related to housing, because of vast supplies of mortgage securitization products that have obviated FOMC edicts.

Essentially he and Bernanke therefore offered papers that composed a sort of Jackson Hole Duel.

Ivory Tower?… hmmm?… I don’t think so much so about Bernanke. I don’t doubt the intellectual honesty or veracity of either man, but I do think Mishkin is more Ivory.

The Spanner walks away from his Fed gig, and only then does he use language you can understand, and talks truth that would have otherwise caused a meltdown if he said it while at the Fed.

Nice observation Billy F. Working for the state, I get R*tF*ck*d: I am forced to contribute to either the State retirement system (that simply gives back only what I put in if I leave early), or a 403(b). I could do better things with the money to ensure my long-term survival, but as you point out, it’s not about me.

Say Hello

About Barry Ritholtz

Ritholtz has been observing capital markets with a critical eye for 20 years. With a background in math & sciences and a law school degree, he is not your typical Wall St. persona. He left Law for Finance, working as a trader, researcher and strategist before graduating to asset managementRead More...

Quote of the Day

"The largest Asian central banks have gone on record that they are curbing their purchases of US debt. And they are also diversifying their huge reserves, steadily moving away from the dollar. The risks have simply become too many and too serious." -W. Joseph StroupeEditor, Global Events

Sign Up For My Newsletter

Get subscriber only insights and news delivered by Barry every two weeks.