The purpose of this writ is to review for the Roman Curia
the authority claimed by this Court justifying its action taken against the
living man james-thomas:mcbride.

Please provide
photocopies of the American Bar Association Cards issued to all members of the
Court associated with this case and also the Foreign Agent Documents required
to be on file. Please include the Bar Association license numbers as a list.

Please
describe for us what is meant by "United States District Court" as
opposed to "U.S. District Court"? Are we to understand that "U.S." is simply an abbreviation for "United States"
or does it denote a separate court and jurisdiction? If these are separate
entities, in what jurisdiction does the "United States District
Court" operate? In what jurisdiction does the "U.S. District
Court" operate? In which of these Courts is james-thomas:mcbride being addressed?

195

Who holds
administrative responsibility for the "United States District Court"
that you operate? If it is a separate entity, who holds administrative
responsibility for the "U.S. District Court"?

Our records
show that james-thomas:mcbride was
born an Ohio State Citizen on the land of the geographically defined OhioState
sixty years ago. Does this Court have
any information or documentation proving otherwise?

Our records
similarly show that james-thomas brought
claim for his life before the Holy See after unscrupulous men deprived him of
his natural estate while still a baby in his cradle. These individuals falsely
claimed that they "represented" him, claimed that their commercial
corporation was his beneficiary, misappropriated his credit, seized his estate,
and enslaved him as chattel belonging to his own estate without his knowledge
or consent. Thereafter, they claimed that he was an employee of their
corporation, a "volunteer" performing various jobs including work as
a postal union employee, a merchant mariner, a withholding agent for the
collection of taxes, and other duties as assigned, without payment or other
consideration for his work. Does this
Court have any information or documentation proving otherwise?

It is our
understanding that there are two entities calling themselves "the"
united states of America and they are: The United States of America (major) comprised of now-50
geographically defined states created by Commonwealth Trust or Statehood
Compacts and joined together by The Articles of Confederation (1781) and the
United States of America (minor) a
"union" of "American states" comprised of 7 Insular states
owned as "federal territories and possessions" including the State of
New Columbia/ Guam/ Puerto Rico/American Samoa/ American Virgin Islands and et alia. Does this Court have any information or documentation proving otherwise?

According to
our records as part of the fraud perpetuated

196

against james-thomas:mcbride and his estate -
his estate was re-venued twice - once by a corporate franchise of "the
United States of America, Incorporated" doing business under conditions of
semantic deceit and again by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) doing
business as the "UNITED STATES" (INC.) which removed his estate to
Puerto Rico and the foreign jurisdiction of the United States of America (minor) described above. Does this Court have any information or
documentation proving otherwise?

Is this second
fraudulent re-venue of james-thomas:mcbride's
estate to Puerto Rico the basis of the Court's presumption that he is a
"U.S.
citizen"? Is this Court claiming jurisdiction over the living man or the
similarly named Puerto Rican ESTATE trust?

If claiming
jurisdiction over the living man james-thomas:mcbride-by what right or
reasoning does this Court claim that fraud is a basis for presumption and
action against the victim of a crime?

If claiming
jurisdiction over a fraudulently created Roman Inferior ESTATE trust that has
been moved to a foreign jurisdiction in obvious Breach of Trust-by what
rationale does this Court support Breach of Trust or deny the redemption of the
JAMES THOMAS MCBRIDE ESTATE by the
lawful beneficiary?

Formed as a
Roman Inferior Trust the james-thomas:mcbride ESTATE is subject to the Roman
Civil Law. As the fraud was discovered and prosecuted under Roman Civil Law and
entered upon the Vatican Chancery Court there can be no mistake and no excuse
or evasion related to the distribution of assets owed. Does this Court dispute the supreme authority of the Roman Curia over
all legal fictions created under Roman Civil Law?

It is our
understanding that the FEDERAL RESERVE has since contrived to re-venue these
ESTATES rightfully belonging

197

to American
State Citizens yet again, and to claim that they are now being operated as
transmitting utilities under UNITED NATIONS auspices. If so, the entire chain of fraud continues to result in more fraud. Fraud
once begun taints everything it touches, invalidating claims made at every step
forever afterward, no matter how venerable a fraud maybe. That is why there is
no statute of limitation on any act of fraud. Does this Court pretend otherwise?

Our records
show that james-thomas re-venued his redeemed estate to the jurisdiction of the
air under the direct protection of the Office of the Pope and that he has
maintained his material interests on the land of The United States of America
(major) and the Ohio State as a beneficiary of his birthright estate and that
he has faithfully kept the peace and expressed the goodwill required of him as
an inhabitant of the Divine Province, which has been established as a seat of
government by the Universal Postal Union. Does this Court have any information
or documentation proving otherwise? Does this Court dispute the authority of
the Universal Postal Union or its establishment of a post office serving the
inhabitants of the air jurisdiction represented by the DivineProvince?
If so, why does this Court believe that the air jurisdiction is any different
from the jurisdictions of the land or the sea? Why should those individuals who
are permanently domiciled in the jurisdiction of the air not be entitled to the
same services?

It is our
understanding that james-thomas:mcbride is lawfully a birthright Citizen of the
Ohio State having civil authority as Caesar on the land and that he is not now
and has never voluntarily consented under
conditions of full disclosure and equity to any "US citizenship"
or "U.S. citizenship" status conferred by the United States of
America (minor) nor any corporate "citizenship" whatsoever conferred
by any commercial or non-profit corporation. Does this Court have any information or documentation substantively
proving otherwise?

198

According to
sworn affidavits of unrebutted fact proven in law by due process and standing
on the record of several international courts it has been the practice of
agents of the UNITED STATES (INC.) and of the United States of America (minor) to claim that American State
Citizens (like:mcbride) have by various mistaken acts such as filing tax forms
-when coerced to do so by persons representing "the U.S. government"­
accepted [unpaid] employment or otherwise accepted undisclosed private
contracts and thereby obligated themselves to perform according to corporate
policies, regulations, codes, and other statutory rules which apply only to
employees of the United States of America (minor)
/ the UNITED STAPES (INC. ) / the United States of America, Inc. or other
similar deceitfully named incorporated entities operating in international
maritime jurisdictions. Does this Court have any proof of james-thomas:mcbride's
knowing and voluntary employment as
a postal union employee of the United
States of America(minor)? As a withholding agent responsible for collecting excise
taxes owed to the United
States of America(minor)? As a member of the Merchant Marine Service of the United States of America(minor)? Does this Court have any proof
of claim of valid maritime employment contract serving to justify presumption
of "U.S.
citizenship"? Does this Court have job descriptions, time sheets,
supervisory records, or other documentation lending credibility to these presumptions
of employment? Does this Court have proof that such employment was undertaken
knowingly, willingly, and under conditions of complete disclosure? Does this
Court have proof that such employment was not coerced and not imposed under
conditions of peonage or slavery?

Does this
Court have any substantive reason to believe that james-thomas:mcbride knowingly and willingly agreed to give up his
status as a State Citizen in favor of the slave status of a "US
citizen" and thereby agreed - among other things -to be subject to the
members of the US Congress reigning as kings and queens

199

over him? That
he knowingly and willingly agreed to be subject to "Selective
Service" requirements? That he willingly and knowingly agreed to
"donate" all his credit - savings, checking, and escrow accounts - to
a Puerto Rican ESTATE trust? That he agreed to give away his labor in support
of a foreign maritime entity merely and deceptively calling itself "the United States of America"?
That he similarly agreed to let a foreign maritime government hypothecate debt
against his private property? That he "voluntarily" contracted to
accept "debt notes" - I.O.U. 's - created out of paper and hot air -
"in equitable exchange" for hi s real property? Is the "United
States District Court' 'in any plausible position while presuming any of these
conditions to be true, or any of the implied contracts to be equitable?

What was james-thomas:mcbride supposedly
receiving in exchange for "willingly" subjecting himself to the
status of a "U.S. citizen" and giving away all his private property,
even his guaranteed "Natural and Unalienable Rights" to the
deceptively named United States of America (minor)?
Does the Court claim that he received the "benefit" of access to
the "Public Charitable Trust" - an unfunded private trust set up to
provide relief to "freed" slaves in the wake of the Civil War? Does
the Court claim that mcbride received charitable "benefits" from the
"Social Security" program - which was presented to him and millions
of other American State Citizens as a "required government insurance
program" they were obligated to pay for as a condition of having
employment in both public and private sectors? Does the Court know that these
Social Security insurance payments were trustingly placed into a separate
"guaranteed" fund that was subsequently pillaged and robbed by
members of the "US Congress" operating as an oligarchy under
conditions of semantic deceit and fraud as the separate and foreign government
of "the United States
of America(minor)"?

It is our
understanding that State Citizen of Ohio james-thomas:mcbride
is not subject to his employees and that he is

200

owed not only
good faith service but "amity in perpetuity" "friendship"
"aid and assistance" from the British Crown and all members of the
American Bar Association who were formerly and wrongly licensed to act as privateers against the estate interests of
james-thomas:mcbride. Is this Court aware that as of September 1, 2013 all
court officers became 100 % individually
liable for their acts and omissions against
American State Citizens including james-thomas:mcbride?

It appears
likely that the Court endeavors to presume that james-thomas's estateis subject to the Court
and that his estate is the actual object of its actions rather than the living
man. Having been informed that the re-venue of his birth estate by the
"State of Ohio" and its agencies was fraudulent, and therefore the
subsequent re-venue of his birth estate by the International Monetary Fund and
its agents to Puerto Rico was similarly tainted by fraud, and now having been
informed that james-thomas's estate has been re-venued to the jurisdiction of
the air under the protection of FRANCISCUS and that he maintains his material
interests and estate upon the land of Ohio as a beneficiary - what possible
rationale does this Court have for assuming jurisdiction over james-thomas:mcbride
or his estate? He is a living man, a State Citizen of Ohio, a foreign state,
and an American National inhabiting The United States of America (major), a foreign nation, and his
individual estate domicile has been re-venued to the jurisdiction of the air.
He is as immune from prosecution by the United States of America(minor) as a Finnish National, so we
must ask what justification does this Court have for addressing him, much less arresting
him?

The same acts
of fraud and re-venue perpetuated against j ames-thomas:mcbride and other
American State Citizens were similarly employed against the interests of the
organic American states and The United States of America (major) by criminally
inclined governmental services corporations merely under contract to provide
public services to the victims and by the United States

201

of America(minor) which pretended to
"represent" The United States of America (major) while usurping upon the land, plundering its assets, and
enslaving its people. All acts of fraud whether perpetuated by individuals or
nations are similarly subject to discovery and they all have the same result:
fraud vitiates all claims made upon it. Thus all interest in the geographically
defined American states and all interest in the American people including their
estates and their vessels in commerce reverts directly to the organic states
and their living inhabitants without
exception. Having been fully informed regarding the current status of these
matters does the "United
States District Court" maintain any
charge against james-thomas:mcbride?

James-thomas:mcbride has been charged by this Court
with making false claims of diplomatic immunity. We think rather that it is
this Court and the officials running the United States of America (minor)
who should be concerned about maintaining diplomatic immunity. James-thomas:mcbride is an individual
"organic state" of the Union and as such exercises all civil
authority upon the land
of The United States of America(major). He is immune from
prosecution by any foreign nation, including the United States of America(minor). Diplomatic immunity is a
privileged status granted by the Global Estate Trust to heads of state,
ambassadors, and others entrusted with affairs of state -including postmasters.
James-thomas was appointed to act as
a regional Postmaster in charge of North America,
because the US POSTMASTER is in default and self-interestedly failing to
provide the services American State Citizens are guaranteed by the Universal Postal Union. The UPU which is and
always was an agency of the Global Estate Trust under the direct guidance of
the Pope acting as Trustee is obligated to provide those services to American
State Citizens. The US POSTMASTER has for some time failed to properly present
passport applications for the use of American State Citizens and committed
constructive fraud by not allowing them to present their status as anything but
"U.S.
citizen"

202

- that is, a
"citizen" of the United
States of America(minor). This is a form of self-incriminating identity theft
enforced via monopoly inducement and inducement to perjury. It cannot be
allowed or condoned by the Universal Postal Union. His Holiness Pope Benedict
XVI appointed james-thomas:mcbride to act as Postmaster General of North
America to correct this and other forms of misadministration of postal services
currently affecting Canada
and The United States of America (major).
James-thomas:mcbride is most definitely owed diplomatic immunity in all
dealings he undertakes with the United States of
America(minor) and
so are the other members of the DivineProvince who act as
postmasters of The United States of America (major). Having been fully informed of the State Citizen status of
james-thomas:mcbride and the nature, purpose, and source of his office, does
this Court continue to pretend jurisdiction over him or allege any wrong-doing
related to his claim of international diplomatic immunity for himself and those
he appoints to act as postmasters serving The United States of America (major)? Does this Court have any
honest questions about his mandate to provide lawful identification and valid
passports for American State Citizens or is this arrest simply more criminal
obstruction aimed at enforcing identity theft and felony fraud?

James-thomas:mcbride has also been charged by this
Court with issuing false documents to other members of the DivineProvince.
All members of the DivineProvince organization are American State Citizens who
have properly re-venued their estates from Puerto Rico
to the global jurisdiction of the air and who maintain their material interests
on the land as beneficiaries and inheritors thereof. They operate under the direct
protection of FRANCISCUS and the Global Estate Trust and the Universal Postal
Union as postmasters of The United States of America (major). We fail to see how this Court, a corporate administrative
tribunal operated under contract by agencies of the United States

203

of America(minor) can accuse james-thomas:mcbride of any wrong-doing
when he is clearly occupying a foreign and superior office and responsibly
administering his duties without prejudice or harm to anyone. It is his job to provide proper identification
and passports to American State Citizens, and it is especially his
responsibility to appoint postmasters to serve The United States of America (major) and expedite the delivery of
services to American State Citizens guaranteed by the UPU. Members of the DivineProvince
organization operate as international peacekeepers and have individually
promised to keep the peace. Does this Court have any cause to complain?

We require a prompt reply from
the "U.S. District Court" and/or the "United States District
Court" - whichever or both of which are prosecuting j ames-thomas:mcbride.

Anna Maria
Riezinger, private attorney in service to His Holiness, Francis/ Civil Judge
Advocate for The United States of America (major), non-negotiable signature,
all rights reserved thisday of
June in the year 2014.