Thursday, July 30, 2015

Tamara Samsonova, 68, was arrested in St. Petersburg, Russia
July 27, 2015 after her image was captured on a closed circuit security camera
dragging a bag suspected of containing human body parts. The remains were
presumed to be those of 79-year-old Valentina Ulanova, a paralyticwho Samsanova was the caretaker for.Ulanova’s
headless body was found near a pond on Dimitrova Street in St. Petersburg.

In one of the clips from the CCTV footage, Samsonova is seen
carrying a saucepan downstairs and exiting the building where the victim lived,
located a few blocks from her fiend, and killer. The saucepan contained the
head of Valentina.

RT News reports that: “First the upper torso, missing the
head and one hand, was found wrapped in a shower curtain. Shortly afterwards a
plastic bag with hips and thighs was discovered. The body had been cut into
eight pieces.

Samsonova, who had recently been in a hospital receiving mental
health treatment, confessed, telling police she had gotten tired of her
companion. The 79-year-old had offended her, Samsonova said, for having failed
to wash out the tea cups.

Police discovered diaries written by Samsonova which
included entries in three languages (Russian, German English) detailing eleven
dismemberment murders that took place over a span of then years. These volumes
were among books on black magic and astrology. The press dubbed her the “Granny
Ripper.” Others have given her the moniker of the ogress of Russian, folklore,
Babushka Yaga (“Baba Yaga”).

A ‘book of spells’ with missing pages belonging to Samsonova
was found by the police. Pages from the same book were found in packages
containing the dismembered the remains of the 2003 murder victim.

A number of unsolved murder cases – in which victims had
been dismembered, with body parts in bags found across the city – are being
reinvestigated by police. The diaries are being used in attempt to match the
detailed descriptions to the evidence on file. The total number of possible
murders, based on the diary plus the evidence, is 13.

2005 – Samsonova reported her husband missing in 2005. He
was never found. It is suspected she murdered him. A neighbor named Maria,
interviewed by reporters, told how she once asked Samsonova about the absence
of her husband and was answered with: “Oh, it's very sad - he just left and disappeared.”

Samsonova confessed to murdering and dismembering another
tenant (English language news reports don’t mention the year). Bags of remains
were found around Frunzensky district of the city. Police say that Samsonova
would drug her victims to immobilize them before murdering them.

~ Her Soviet Past ~

After the arrest, police found blood spots in her bathroom,
a saw and a knife they suspect she used to cut up the corpses of her victims.

Samsonova lied to police about her background, claiming she
was a retired actress and a graduate of the Vaganov Ballet Academy, when in
fact she was a former Soviet “monitor” who surveilled hotel guests at the Grand
Hotel Europe, which was once regarded the most luxurious hotels in the world.

The description of Samsonova’s job “monitoring” hotel guests
describes what in the Soviet era was a KGB-employed prostitute. Prostitution
was illegal in the Soviet era, yet prostitutes were used by the KGB as
informants, assigned to hotels to collect information on foreign guests.

~ Continuing Investigation ~

On August 5, 2015 the sensational news that Samsonova may
cannibalized her victims appeared in the international media. Police are giving
out little about their ongoing investigation, but reports are that the woman
had cut out the lungs of those she murdered and consumed the organs.

The information was given by unidentified sources in Russia’s
Investigative Committee (equivalent of USA’s FBI). Forensic reports indicate
that internal organs, in particular lungs, were removed from victims’ bodies.

Another sensational piece of the story is the allegation
that her final victim, 79-year-old Valentina Ulanova, was still living (but
drugged) when her friend and caretaker began to use a hacksaw to cut her to
pieces.

Several quotations from the diaries were given to the press.
Referring to a tenant to whom she had rented a spare room, she wrote: “I
killed my tenant Volodya, cut him to pieces in the bathroom with a knife, put
the pieces of his body in plastic bags and threw them away.”

~ Before the Court ~

When Samsonova appeared in court in the opening week of
August, 2015 to face the first charges to be made against her, the murder of
her friend Ulanova, the prisoner declared to Judge Roman Chebotaryov:

“I was getting ready for this court action for dozens of
years. It was all done deliberately. With this last murder I closed the
chapter.”

He replied: “I am asked to arrest you. What do you think?”

Her answer was: “You decide, your honor. I am guilty and I
deserve a punishment.”

~ Updates ~

Investigators are now considering the number of Samsonova’s
possible victims to be as many as 24.

Officials have stated that Samsonova whas been obsessed with
the history of Russian male serial killer “Chikalito,” a cannibal who, over a
period of 12 years murdered at least 52, mostl;y (or all?) woman. Marina
Krivenko, a neighbor who has known Samonova for 15 years told news reporters
that her friend was “very interested in maniac Chikatilo” and had “gathered
information about him and how he committed his murders.”

[This article will continue to be updated as new information
comes in.]

Saturday, July 25, 2015

This is a collection of memes created for the Unknown History of Misandry that use
Comix. Below the memes you will find a discussion of the term “critical gender
theory.”

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

What is “critical gender theory?” It is the dominant philosophy of feminism; the one that is used (in the US) by the American Bar
Association to shape laws, by government agencies, and by private foundations
and universities to shape policy and protocols (in order to engage in social
engineering). It derives from “critical theory” a philosophical position shaped
by Frankfurt School philosophers. Adherents of the “critical theory” philosophy
often refer to their belief system simply (and quite cryptically)as “theory,” as in “I’m studying theory.”

Some of these philosophers, such as Frederick Jameson, use
the term “Cultural Marxism” to describe a more general political approach that
includes both Frankfurt School Marxism and other “post-structuralist” and
“post-modernist” ideas and philosophies.

Critics of the top-down agendas of institutions that have
shaped themselves after the “critical gender theory” formula sometimes call the
agenda and its results “feminist governance.”

***

Here is a an example of the use of the term “critical gender
theory” in its professional (philosophical) context:

“So it is that deconstruction and critical gender theory
both seek to unveil capitalism’s ‘other’ and disrupt the ‘ontological totality’
which Marx proffers.”

[Chris Lloyd, “Heirs of Marx, Critical Legal Thinking,”
Oct. 24, 2011; a discussion of the 1996 book The End of Capitalism (as we
knew it): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy by of Katherine
Gibson and Julie Graham]

The term “critical theory” has become so dominant in
academe that it has been allowed to, in essence “colonize” language and usage
in some cases.Notable example is
“critical thinking,” a non-political term describing “the objective analysis
and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgment.”

Yet more and more we see the term “critical thinking” used
in a radically different sense, one that denotes adherence to a particular a
priori political stance. The trend apparently flows from another “critical”
term, Critical Literacy ( a term “usually traced to Paolo Freire, the Brazilian
lawyer turned educator”).

Today “critical thinking” is often a term used to denote a
specifically political approach to pedagogy that is based on Friere-type
politicized “critical literacy.”

Another instance of the “critical” term as applied to
political ideology labelled in such a way that the terms resembles the
objective, rational approach of authentic critical thinking is the term
“critical pedagogy.”

Example:

“The idea of Critical Pedagogy begins with the neo-Marxian
literature on Critical Theory (Stanley 1992). The early Critical Theorists
(most of whom were associated with the Frankfurt School) believed that Marxism
had underemphasized the importance of cultural and media influences for the
persistence of capitalism; that maintaining conditions of ideological hegemony
were important for (in fact inseparable from) the legitimacy and smooth working
of capitalist economic relations.

Thursday, July 23, 2015

VILLIERS-AU-TERRE, FRANCE: On July 2, 2015, Dominique
Cottrez, a 51, French former health worker, was, after years of legal delays,
convicted of murdering 8 newborns. Despite prosecutors’ request for an 18 year
sentence the jury recommended only 9 years of prison for the killer mom.

It was on July 24, 2010 that new buyers of the former home
of Dominique’s parents in Villers-au-Tertre in the
north of France near the Belgian border, discovered the skeletons of two
babies in the garden. Mme. Cottrez was arrested and confessed. She agreed to
show police the location of 6 more tiny corpses of babies she had smothered to
death. They were stored in a fuel storage tank, in plastic bags, in the garage
of her own home in the same village. The killings occurred from 1989 through
2000 in the village with a population of 655. In most of the killings she
suffocated the baby in the bathroom.

Daughter Virginie, 21, told
reporters atLa Voix du Nord (on July
29, 2010): “It’s incomprehensible.” We never noticed anything. She had moments
of fatigue, it's true, but she was working almost 24 hours a day. She would
wake up early for her work as a nurse's home aid, and when she would return
home, she had her housework.”

~ Blame “The Patriarchy” ~

After her arrest, Dominique confessed and told police she
was the victim of rape, by her own father, who died three years earlier in
2007. In her tale she said the first rape occurred when she was only 8 year old
and continued into her teens. She claimed that as an adult she the entered a
voluntary incestuous with her father that continued after her marriage.She “she was in love with her father
more than with her husband.”

Five years later, on June 29, 2015 while in court she
admitted that the incest story was a fabrication. DNA evidence confirmed that
her husband was the father of each of the deceased children.

~ Blame another woman ~

She was already obese when, in 2000, she gave birth for the
first time. Her weight when pregnan was given as around 130 kg (286 lbs). It
was a difficult delivery. Lawyers attempted to blame Ms. Cottrez’s murderous
proclivities by arguing that the midwife who attended her at that first birth
had hurt her feelings by pointing out her unhealthy condition of obesity.

~ Husband: Two Different Stories ~

At first she asserted her husband had no knowledge of the
pregnancies. Years later, as the process dragged on she changed her story on
this point and claimed her husband had been aware, despite the obesity that
succeeded in hiding the pregnancy from the two daughters whom she had allowed
to live as well as, neighbors, nurse colleagues and the doctors at a nearby
hospital.

Associated Press in Paris reported that a spokesman for
prosecutors reported that Mme. Cottrez “did not want any more children and that
she did not want to see a doctor about methods of contraception.”

~ Trial, Conviction ~

Trial at the Douai Assize court opened June 25, 2015,
closing on July 2. After five hours of deliberation the jury found her guilty
of all counts, but recommended a reduced sentence based on the view that the
defendant had “impaired judgment.” Prosecutors requested an 18-year sentence
but the jury set the sentence at 9 years.

In Oulu, Finland between 2005 and 2013 a 35-year-old woman
(whose name is being withheld by the government) was found to have killed five
of her own newborn children and hid their corpses in a freezer. The crimes were
discovered on June 4, 2014. The mother claimed they had all been stillborn. It
was a lie. It was determined, using dental evidence, that some of the victims
had lived up to four days before they were dumped into a bucket where they
perished from exposure and starvation.

The first two infant victims were fathered by different,
unidentified, men. The Oulu mother married a man in 2010, gave birth to another
baby and killed it, reporting to the father that their child had miscarried.
The couple conceived two more children and, as as is seen in so many cases of
maternal filicide, the mother seems to have convinced that father that the
signs of pregnancy were the result of ordinary weight gain. The father of the
three murdered children filed for divorce immediately after the bodies were
discovered. All of the babies were born full-term or nearly full-term,
according to the statements of the prosecutor.

On December 16, 2014 the Oulu
District Prosecutor Sari Kemppaine demanded that theOulu District Court reduce the gravity of the
charges against the mother, from murder to aggravated assaults and aggravated
manslaughter. The prosecutor used the terms “gross negligence” to describe the
cause of all five deaths.

On June 15, 2015 at the District Court of Oulu, the mother
was convicted of killing the five infants and was sentenced to a nominal “life”
sentence, which in Finland means she will likely serve only 12 years for the
deaths.

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

In January 1994 pieces of the body of Peter Michael Green,
51, who had been reported missing in late 1993, were found in cookware, in
other containers pickled body parts were found, were found in the Alamosa,
Colorado, apartment of his 41-year-old girlfriend, Carolyn Gloria Blanton(AKA Jane Lynn Woodry). Other body
parts were in other locations: the head was found in “a remote area.” Mr. Green’s
torso was discovered in his own home. Outside, a trash bin contained his legs.

Sheriff’s Captain Les Sharff testified later in court that: “The flesh and the meat
were off the legs. They had been totally cut away from the bones themselves,
from the ankle up.”

Among
the the evidence exhibits accepted into evidence during the the trial were a
pot, a bowl and a spoon, each which had been found in Ms. Blanton’s home
containing bite-size chunks from the boyfriend’s corpse. Plus a .25 caliber
pistol. It was determined she had shot him four times before starting in on the
carving and cooking.

She
was found not guilty by reason of insanity and committed to the Colorado Mental Health Institute in Pueblo,
an institute for the criminally insane, where she remained until 2005.

“I
want people to know that the community is safe,”Woodry said to a reporter. “I am not a danger to the
community.”

At the end of atwo-hour
hearing which took place at Alamosa on April 9, 2005,Carolyn
Gloria Blanton / Jane Lynn Woodry, the court decided to release her on
conditional release. Her treating psychiatrist Elissa
Ball, who had worked with the patient for ten years, testified that the
cannibal killer could now tell right from wrong and was unlikely to do anything
violent if she accepts semi-monthly injections of twice-monthly
injections of Risperdal Consta.

Other conditions for release
included a requirement for employment, attending Alcoholics Anonymous
meetings, and keeping a diary which would be monitored. Any romantic interests
would also, by order of the court, be closely watched.

“I don’t know. I felt compelled to do it. I didn’t want to
forget her ever.”

These are the words said by Laurina Marie Aune, 26, to
Justice James Taylor of the British Columbia Supreme Court on July 20, 2003.
Ms. Aune was telling the court why, 8 months earlier, on November 1, 2002 in
the B. C. town of Nanaimo, she slit two-year-old daughter’s throat, dismembered
the child’s corpse and, with other ingredients, made Kyla’s remains, most of
them, into a soup – which the mother consumed.

Ms. Aune did not cook Kylas’s head; she kept that in her
bedroom. She did cook the heart and ate a portion of it because, as she told
police, “because she felt that’s where her child’s spirit was.”

Few news reports on this case are currently available online
and the few that are available are scanty.

Laurina was a “single mom.” Since, in recent decades journalists, seldom
bother to mention fathers in reports on children involved in crime stories
(unless that father is a perpetrator) it is unclear whether the man Sandra McCulloch of CamWest News
describes as Laurina Aune’s “former boyfriend, Scott May” was little
Kyla’s father.

In any case, it was Mr. May who had reported the girl
missing, leading to the investigation which revealed the crime. At some point
(news reports are vague) Mr. May told social workers that Ms. Aune was
“unstable,” describing the bizarre assertions thew woman made regarding Kyla’s
parentage, claiming that the little girl had “three different fathers and they
kept changing bodies.”

Six weeks before her death, Scott had taken Kyla out for
Halloween. That was the last time he saw her.

In June 2003, the court remanded Ms. Aune to the Forensic
Psychiatric Institute in Port Coquitlam. A disposition hearing was scheduled to
take place no later than September 2013.

According to journalist Sandra McCulloch Laurine Aune “suffers from schizophrenia,” yet
the news article relating this does not indicate what party may have made such
an assessment. In Justice James Taylor’s July 20, 2003 ruling he found that Ms.
Aune was not “criminally responsible” for her deed and was unaware that the act
was “morally wrong” due to mental illness. Testimony revealed she began having
delusions (“hearing voices”) beginning at the age of 12.

Family members, in the course of the investigation were asked
why they never suspected that Ms. Aune was insane. They responded to such
questions by saying: “That’s Laurina.”

Sunday, July 12, 2015

Here are our comments on the important new blog, “An Ear for
Men,” launched on July 4, 2015 by veteran battler of totalitarian mind
manipulators, Paul Elam.

Ear is a male
space – something that the Lords and Ladies of Correct Thought keep telling you
is an impermissible thing. Control-freaks will absolutely despise Ear. And that, by itself, is enough to cause us to respect it.

Please read Ear
and share it and promote change toward truth and integrity (the good kind of
“change” – as opposed to the “change” of decadence, entropy, dysfunction and
authoritarianism that is promoted by officious rulers).

An Ear for Men – Refreshing and wise: Empathy without
mollycoddling, without fostering and fueling the pathological “victim
mentality.”

The orthodox position of technocratic social engineers
(whether they be corporatist in nature or not-for-profit control-freak in
nature) assert in their propaganda organs that “male occupied space is
inherently dangerous to women.”

It is not.

Male space is however, dangerous – dangerous to technocrats
and free-lance control freaks, whose greatest weapon of mass control is the
same as the modern military’s greatest weapon (which the Pentagon labels:
“mastery of the human domain.”).

“Men are only as mentally and emotionally healthy as their
ability to say no to a woman.” -- Some writers go their whole lives without
making a single genuinely important quotable statement.

Yet here we have what amounts to an axiom -- a major,
crucially important truth summed up in a single crystal-clear sentence. The
crafting and publication of just is one sentence -- this universal and necessary-to-know,
and -grasp, fact -- is justification for a lifetime of effort. Paul Elam has
crafted a pure and sparkling gem for the ages, one that needs to be posted on
the wall of every Male Space in every city, town, village and "wide spot
in the road" in the free world ("free world" meaning the
non-gynocentric, not yet fully Statist, world).

***

3
►July 11, 2015 – Paul Elam, “Male autonomy: Part 1” (Paul starts a three part series on beating gynocentrism in the confines of
your own mind.)

• • •

The Matt Taylor diptych presented here is the icon for the
age. Unforgettable, compelling, a call to mind and muscle. It is worth 7
billion words.

The propaganda of coerced “progress” puts out a menu full of
photos, carefully composed, with vibrant colors, and seductive shapes,
depicting a glittering, enticing “nouvelle cuisine.” Yet once you sign on the
dotted line of the “progress” contract you are a serf and the dishes shoved
your way are diverse in only the species – source of the feces that constitute
the means you are presented with. Understanding the fundamentals of nature will
prepare one to resist the confidence game run by the flim flam men and women
of the “progress” racket. Know your true root nature (biological/psychological)
and know that this reality is not a social construction. Latin, French and
Germanic (and many other) nouns indeed have “gender.” Yet nouns are just
abstractions. Organisms, on the other hand, have existential concrete reality:
complex mortal lives, lived in real space and real time – with agency. Submit
to coercion, or resist it: it is a choice.

An Ear for Men is
a male space, and as such, is an affront to the Brave New World panopticon
top-down technocrats and all their minions (petty tyrants of the soulless
bureaucracies and commissariats). An Ear
for Men is a “crime” against the Hoax Utopia.

Saturday, July 11, 2015

FULL TEXT: A crime has been brought
to light in New Caledonia which furnishes a ghastly illustration of the class
of malefactors sent out to that island by the French Government. The
perpetrator of it, we learn from the Neo-Caledonien of the 23rd of January, was what we should call a
ticket-of-leave-holder a woman named Roger. She and her husband had received a
grant of land on the banks of the Foa, and one day in August last, while the
head of the household was out at work, she took her little daughter, who was
only two years old, into a neighbouring wood, and, as it is believed, seized
the child by one of her legs, and shattered her skull by dashing it either
against a stone or the trunk of a tree. Some months elapsed the corpse was
discovered; and the skull, from which the flesh had disappeared, was found to
be fractured in front and still to exhibit a red stain on the spot where the
poor little creature’s life-blood had oozed out. It was ascertained at the
trial that this was the third crime of the kind the murderess had committed; the
first having been perpetrated in 1869, and the second in 1878. For the latter
she was sentenced to imprisonment for life with hard labour, but obtained her
liberation on being sent out to New Caledonia. No other motive was assigned for
her unnatural atrocities than that she disliked the expense and trouble
entailed upon her by having a child to look after.

Thursday, July 9, 2015

No information about the woman given
by English newspapers the name of “Jacobleva” has yet been located. “Jacobleva”
(transliterated) may be a nom de guerre rather
than a proper name.

The other three figures appear
briefly in some studies of the Red Guard. Further research is needed. Perhaps
visitors who have studied Bolshevism in detail can assist.

This post will be augmented after
consulting the book: Barbara Evans Clements, Bolshevik Women
(Cambridge University Press, 1997).

***

1) “Jacobleva” – Petrograd

EXCERPT: The real dictator of
Petrograd is a woman of the name of Jacobleva, aged 22, who, in her capacity, of
the head of the famous Commission (the Extraordinary Committee for Fighting the
Counter-Revolution, Speculation, and Sabotage), surpasses all existing legends
of cruelty. [“Woman Dictator - Chaos In Petrograd.” (Kalgoorie, Australia),
Feb. 26, 1919, p. 6]

***

2) Vera Grebeniukova (aka Dora) – Odessa, Ukraine

“A large share of the torturers were
of non-Russian nationalities, selected in Lenin’s assessment Russians seemed
‘too mushy,’ unable to cope with the ‘tough measures.’Among the torturers there were also women. “Vera
Grebennikova, one in Odessa, in just two months have killed 700 people.”
(autostranslate revised by RStE)

“Women were also not exempt from the perpetration of
sadistic violence. Vera Grebennikova, for example, was alleged to have killed
over 700 people, many of them with her bare hands, during two months in
Odessa..”

“Rozalia Zemliachka and her lover Bela Kun murdered 50,000
White officers (with Lenin's approval). They were tied in pairs to planks and
burned alive in furnaces; or drowned in barges that she sank offshore.” [Crimes of the Century, C. J. Griffin, on 20 July
2005, Amazon book review]

Wikipedia: Rozalia Samuilovna Zalkind (Russian: Залкинд Розалия Самуиловна) known
under nicknames Devil (for personal participation in mass executions) and
Zemlyachka (20 March 1876 – 21 January 1947) was a Russian revolutionary,
Soviet politician and statesman. She is best known for her involvement in the
organization of the First Russian revolution, and along with Bela Kun, as one
of the organizers of the Red Terror in the Crimea in 1920-1921, against former
soldiers of the White Army.

“In Arkhangel, Rebecca Platinina
snuffed out the lives of more than a hundred, including the entire family of
his husband, who was executed by crucifixion, in a an act of wanton revenge. “The agents who committed these brutalities ended their
days immersed in insanity.According to Gippius,
a major female poet of Petrograd during the period of the red terror observed
that “there was literally a single family in which someone had not been
arrested, taken and then disappeared without a trace.” (autostranslate revised
by RStE) [“Ideologias e ideias,” 06 de Abril
de 2010, Boletim (newsletter) – 708]

“Rebecca Platinina-Maisel in Arkhangelsk killed over a
hundred, including the whole family of her ex-husband whom she crucified in an
act of savage revenge. Such was the brutalizing effect of this relentless
violence that not a few Chekists ended up insane. Bukharin said that
psychopathic disorders were an occupational hazard of the Chekist profession.
Many Chekists hardened themselves to the killings by heavy drinking or drug
abuse.” [Читать онлайн "A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution,
1891-1924" автора Figes Orlando - RuLit - Страница 239]

Cheka (ЧК – чрезвыча́йная коми́ссия chrezvychaynaya
komissiya, Emergency Committee, Russian pronunciation: [tɕɪˈka])
was the first of a succession of Soviet state security organizations. It was
created on December 20, 1917, after a decree issued by Vladimir Lenin, and was
subsequently led by Felix Dzerzhinsky, a Polish aristocrat turned communist. By
late 1918, hundreds of Cheka committees had been created in various cities, at
multiple levels including: oblast, guberniya ("Gubcheks"), raion,
uyezd, and volost Chekas, with Raion and Volost Extraordinary Commissioners.
Many thousands of dissidents, deserters, or other people were arrested,
tortured or executed by various Cheka groups. After 1922, Cheka groups
underwent a series of reorganizations, with the NKVD, into bodies whose members
continued to be referred to as "Chekisty" (Chekists) into the late
1980s.

From its founding, being the military and security arm of
the Bolshevik communist party, the Cheka was instrumental in the Red Terror. In
1921 the Troops for the Internal Defense of the Republic (a branch of
the Cheka) numbered at least 200,000. These troops policed labor camps; ran the
Gulag system; conducted requisitions of food; subjected political opponents to
torture and summary execution; and put down rebellions and riots by workers or
peasants, and mutinies in the desertion-plagued Red Army.

Wednesday, July 8, 2015

Excerpt from Wikipedia: Julia Brystiger (née Prajs, born November 25, 1902, in
Stryj – died November 9, 1975, in Warsaw) was a Polish Communist activist and
member of the security apparatus in Stalinist Poland. She was also known as Julia
Brystygier, Bristiger, Brustiger, Briestiger, Brystygierowa,
Bristigierowa, and by her nicknames – given by the victims of torture: Luna,
Bloody Luna, Daria, Ksenia, and Maria. The nickname
Bloody Luna was a direct reference of her Gestapo-like methods during
interrogations. Her pen name was Julia Preiss.

In the Polish official archives, there is an instruction
written by Brystygier to her subordinates, about the purpose of torture:

“In fact, the Polish intelligentsia as such is against the Communist
system and basically, it is impossible to re-educate it. All that remains is to
liquidate it. However, since we must not repeat the mistake of the Russians
after the 1917 revolution, when all intelligentsia members were exterminated,
and the country did not develop correctly afterwards, we have to create such a
system of terror and pressure that the members of the intelligentsia would not
dare to be politically active.” [Czeslaw
Leopold and Krzysztof Lechicki, Political
Prisoners in Poland 1945-1956, Mloda
Polska, Gdańsk, page 20.]

Brystiger personally oversaw the first stages of each UB
investigation at her place of employment. She would torture the captured
persons using her own methods such as whipping male victims’ genitals.

Monday, July 6, 2015

FULL TEXT: After serving nearly twenty-three years in the
Territorial prison in Honolulu for her part in three brutal murders, Pulolo, an
aged Hawaiian woman, now nearly sixty years of age, was released on Christmas
day on pardon from Governor Pinkham. The woman was known as a kahuna, and was
greatly feared, it is said, on the Island of Lanai, where her crimes were
committed early in the year 1892. At the time of her release, she had been in
prison probably longer than any other prisoner in the institution.

Pulolo’s crimes were among the most notorious ever committed
in these islands, and her brutality in their commission so stirred the citizens
of Maui and Lanai that after the first trial, when she was convicted by a
native jury, the second trial was transferred from Wailuku to Kauai, to obtain
a more impartial jury. During her many later years in prison it is said Pulolo
has reformed and repented of her early evil deeds. She comes forth now an aged,
broken and deeply chastened woman.

The story of her crimes and their motive, as related by the
newspaper files of 22 years ago, is briefly that she claimed the powers of a
kahuna, or sorceress, and, falling in love with her sister’s husband, set out
to kill the sister and her own husband, that she might be free to many the
brother-in-law.

In order to accomplish this without arousing suspicion of
her real motives, she began by punishing a 6-year-old boy, the son of her elder
brother. Assisted by her retinue of “soldiers” she first assaulted her husband,
cowed him and then literally beat the child to death.

Aided actively by the sweetheart she wished to marry she
then assaulted her sister. The murderous couple bound the sister and buried her
head in hot sand until she was suffocated. Placing that body beside the corpse
of the boy in the little family house Pulolo called upon two of her servitors
and seized Kaholokai, her sweet heart and former aide, caused him to be bound
and then beat him to death with her own hands. It was understood that her
sudden change of tactics, in turning on her sweetheart and killing him, was
through fear that he would reveal the true details of the affair.

On the morning following the triple murder, still exercising
her influence over her retinue, she had the house and all three bodies burned,
to hide the evidence of the crime, and prepared a plausible story which her
friends were instructed to tell in explanation of the deaths.

Some old-time Hawaiians placed great faith in her alleged
power as a kahuna, and a story is even told of her use of the baleful occult
influence some years ago, during her incarceration. This is to the effect that
she told another female prisoner who had incurred her enmity:

“You will not live 24 hours after you leave prison.” The
tale is that her prophecy came true, the woman taking ill immediately after her
release and dying within the time prescribed by Pulolo.

Sunday, July 5, 2015

It is intelligent, well-argued and gets to the roots of the
irrationality of the zealots and fanatics who choose to ignore facts,
truth, and basic verifiable biological science, and is instead favors the propagation of
narrow, conformist, ideology-driven, authoritarian, censorious, infested with
“denial” psychology, narcissistic, self-serving, beliefs.

Opening paragraph:

“Despite what members of the feminist movement want to
claim, it's easy to see the cult mentality of the political party. Here I will
explain why exactly feminism is a cult and should be treated as such:”

FULL TEXT: Vienna, December 17. – Intense interest was shown
in the trial of Milica Virkobrankovice, a beautiful ex-school teacher, 22 years
of age, who was sentenced to three and a-half years’ imprisonment for
attempting to murder a rich bookseller’s wife and two sons. Milica was the
bookseller’s mistress and desired to marry him. She mixed white lead in the
household’s flour and sugar, resulting in all being taken ill. Five years ago
Milica was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment for attempting to murder with arsenic
phosphorus the wife of a school inspector whom she desired to marry. — Sun.