UNITED
NATIONS, March
11 -- Amid a
litany of rape
charges
against UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous, Inner
City Press
exclusively
obtained and
on February 12
published UN
emails showing
another round
of sexual
abuse of
minors in
Ouaka
prefecture in
the Central
African
Republic by UN
Peacekeepers
from the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo. Click
here to view.

On March
11, the UN
Security
Council
adopted a
resolution on
the topic,
after an
Egyptian
proposed
amendment was
defeated five
in favor, nine
against and
one
abstention.
(Egypt
abstained on
the final
vote.) Inner
City Press put
the adopted
resolution
online here.

Operative
Paragraph 2
calls for
repatriation
when “a
particular
troop-contributing
country whose
personnel are
the subject of
an allegation
or allegations
of sexual
exploitation
and abuse has
not taken
appropriate
steps to
investigate
the allegation
and/or when
the particular
troop- or
police-contributing
country has
not held the
perpetrators
accountable or
informed the
Secretary
General of the
progress of
its
investigations
and/or actions
taken.”

Operative
Paragraph 8,
which we're
calling the
Sangaris
paragraph for
the French
Sangaris force
in CAR, “calls
upon Member
States
deploying
non-United
Nations forces
authorized
under a
Security
Council
mandate to
take
appropriate
steps to
investigate
allegations of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse,
hold
perpetrators
accountable
and repatriate
units when
there is
credible
evidence of
widespread or
systemic
sexual
exploitation
or abuse by
those units.”

Will
France
repatriate
itself?
Earlier on
March 11,
Inner City
Press asked
French minster
(of the
environment)
Segolene Royal
about not only
the UN Global
Compact but
also the
scandal of the
French
Sangaris rapres
in CAR.

Segolene Royal
said that the
French defense
minister
Jean-Yves le
Drian is
addressing the
issue. Inner
City Press
later tweeted
at the both:
where is the
response? How
long is
credible to
take action?
"Shorter is
better," the
genial French
Ambassador
Francois
Delattre said.
We'll have
more on this.

On March
4 at 11 am
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
report on
"Special
measures for
protection
from sexual
exploitation
and sexual
abuse" came
out from under
embargo and
Inner City
Press
immediately
published this
review.

On March 10,
Ban presented
his report to
the UN
Security
Council,
followed by
Council
members'
speeches.
Ladsous
attended -
refusing Inner
City Press'
question about
Code Blue's
critique on
the way in --
and left even
as China was
speaking.

Later at
the March 10
noon briefing,
Inner City
Press asked
the director
of UN Women
Phumzile
Mlambo, not
for the first
time, for her
response to
Ladsous having
publicly
linked the
rapes to
R&R. She
replied that
she remembered
the Press
question, but
hadn't been
able to
"corroborate"
it.

Spain
in the debate
said that
countries
should have
six months to
take action.
So how long
has French
taken on the
Sangaris
rapes? Inner
City Press
asked Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric for
his view. He
said the
French process
is ongoing.
For how long?

We'll
have more on
the question
of whether the
draft Security
Council
resolution
should also
address
Sangaris, and
for example
the French
Force Licorne
in Cote
d'Ivoire.
Inner City
Press asked
Brazil's
Patriota if
the issue
should be in
the General
Assembly as
well. He said
yes, citing
Jose Ramos
Horta -- who
has chimed in
to the UN
against its
ouster of
Inner City
Press, so far
without it
being
reversed. Now
we can say:
Ban knows.
Personally.

On March 4 at
the 11:15 am
press
conference --
tellingly, the
UN
Correspondents
Association
wasn't present
- Inner City
Press asked
Khare why it
wasn't Ladsous
presenting,
why Ban
Ki-moon noted
without
criticism a
mere nine day
suspension for
sexual
exploitation,
why sexual
abuse of a 14
year old was
classified by
the UN as
"transactional"?

Khare
did not
explain
Ladsous'
absence, nor
answer if
Ladsous was
the unnamed UN
official who
pre-spun
Reuters and a
few others.

He did not
directly say
that Reuters
broke the
embargo - he
said to ask
DPI about that
, which is
funny in that
DPI threw
Inner City
Press out of
the UN for
trying to
cover an event
in this same
UN Press
Briefing Room,
while
collaborating
with Reuters -
but added he
was surprised
to see the
advance story.
Video
here.

There is no
accountability
at the top -
or in the
field. The
March 4 report
in Paragraph
20 presents as
legitimate a
nine day
suspension for
sexual
exploitation,
and undefined
"administrative
sanctions" for
sexual
exploitation
that led to a
"Peacekeeper
baby." This is
shameful.

Zeid
firing
whistleblower
Kompass was
asking about
by France 24 -
but not
Ladsous.

As to
the Central
African
Republic,
where the UN
covered up
French
Sangaris
troops child
rapes and then
fired the
whistleblower
-- not
mentioned in
the report --
the UN blamed
the victims,
saying the
country is
poor, women
and girls are
for sale: a
more
diplomatic
entree into
what Ladsous
came out and
said on
September 11,
2015, linking
rapes to
R&R.

Combine
this with an
Inner City
Press question
Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric
refused to
answer - how
could the UN
log in sexual
abuse of a 14
year old,
statutory
rape, as
"transactional"
sex -- and the
scam of Ban's
response
becomes clear.

Perhaps
because the
product is so
worthless, the
attempt to
sell and spin
it was
extensive.

Since
December Inner
City Press has
asked at noon
briefings when
Ban Ki-moon's
response to
the Deschamps
report would
be released,
including
asking about
member state
dissatisfaction
with the
response, and
Ladsous.
"March," Ban's
two spokesman
said.

On
Wednesday
Inner City
Press learned
that not the
official
responsible
for the rapes,
Herve Ladsous,
but lower
profile Atul
Khare had shot
a UN TV
"interview"
about the
response. Now,
in similar
propaganda
fashion, an
UNnamed UN
official has
poured the
spin on
Reuters and
the old "small
group of
reporters" --
that is, those
who never
reported that
Ladsous, on
camera, linked
the rapes to
R&R. This
is the UN
Corruption
Association.

But,
even as to the
report which
the UN
insisted was
under embargo
until 11 am on
March 4, when
Reuters
nevertheless
published a
weak story
about it on
March 3, with
no mention of
Ladsous, the
UN did
nothing.

Given
the UN's no
due process
move to on
February 19
expel Inner
City Press
from the UN
for merely
trying to
cover an event
in the UN
Press Briefing
Room on
January 29, petition
here,
Inner City
Press strictly
complied with
the embargo
although
obtaining the
report through
other channels
was easy.

Reuters
doesn't have
to worry about
the UN
throwing it
out - it does
(some in) the
UN's dirty
work. We'll
have more on
this as well.

Even
from within
DPKO there is
disgust at the
response, as
dodging or not
implement many
of the
recommendations.
More on that
when the UN
belatedly
comes out from
behind its
self-pleasuring
curtain of its
own media, and
insider
scribes. One
final note:
the Reuters
bureau chief
at the March 1
press
conference by
Angola on its
Program of
work loudly
cut off
another
reporter - not
this one -- as
if owning the
UN.

After
Inner City
Press on
February 15
asked about
the email its
had published
- and Reuters'
UN bureau
chief Louis
Charbonneau,
notably, tried
to dismiss
and then stole
the story
- on February
16 UN Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq in
the noon
briefing read
out a
statement
confirming
nearly all of
the email
Inner City
Press had
published:
that there
were four new
victims,
minors, troops
from DR Congo.

But Haq
did not say
that two of
the victims
had children
from the
statutory
rape. So Inner
City Press
asked Haq to
confirm that,
and asked who
would pay: the
UN or the DRC
soldiers? Haq
said there are
meetings in
Ban's office
to respond to
just such
issues, after
December's
Deschamps
report. Video
here.

And then
Reuters, even
while its
editor Dan
Grebler said
the first
theft was
being looked
into, just
retyped and
stole it
again, this
time by its UN
correspondent
Michelle
Nichols, here.

It was
this same
Nichols who,
at the UN
Security
Council
stakeout on
February 18
while Inner
City Press was
live-streaming
after asking
about a draft
statement on
Palestine, cut
in loudly with
"I see you
Periscoping!"
And? So what?
UN missions
and the UN
itself are
broadcasting
inside the UN
on Periscope.
Why would one
media try to
censor others?

So
Inner City
Press raised
the issue of
theft of
exclusives
(and lack of
objectivity,
at least at
the UN) to
Reuters
itself. For
now, we've
received this,
cc-ed also not
only to the
(repeat)
offender but
also to
Reuters'
genial seeming
Brian Moss and
Clive McKeef:

"Thank you for
bringing this
matter to my
attention. The
appropriate
Reuters staff
will look into
it and get
back to you as
soon as
feasible.

Regards,
Dan Grebler
Desk Editor,
Americas Desk"

But but
February 18,
still no
response. It's
not that
complicated.
Or was the
Reuters
correspondent's
"intervention"
the response?
We'll have
more on this
too.

The
underlying
emails, dated
February 11,
2016, describe
at least four
underage
victims, two
of whom were
impregnated by
the rapist UN
peacekeepers
-- "in the
locality
Ngakobo in the
Ouaka
prefecture."

On
February 15,
after emailing
questions for
two days to UN
spokespeople
in CAR and New
York, Inner
City Press at
the UN's noon
briefing asked
UN Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq
about the
rapes, and the
email it
published on
February 12.
Haq answered,
dodging on
part of the
email but not
denying it. Video here.

Then
Associated
Press asked,
what about
these new
allegations? Video here. Haq
answered - and
from that, AP
wrote its own
derivative and
belated story
-- without
credit, and
without any
mention of the
critique of
the UN in the
emails. This
is how it
works, or
doesn't.

This too
- Reuters UN
"bureau chief"
on Monday
evening first
reflexively
came to the
UN's defense
saying that
"Alleged
Central
African
Republic rapes
UN spox talked
about today
are same ones
UN CAR said
Feb 4 it was
probing,"
citing (what
else) a
Reuters story
of February 4
-- about a
Human Rights
Watch report
about rapes in
Bambari. But read
the February
11 emails
Inner City
Press
exclusively
published,
here:

“Herewith
sharing with
you a report I
have just
received from
UNICEF
indicating
four minor
girls aged
between 16 and
17 years were
victims of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse
allegedly
committed by
members of the
DRC battalion
in the
locality
Ngakobo in the
Ouaka
prefecture.”

Up the
email chain,
Mercedes
Gervilla in UN
headquarters
writes that
“it would seem
that many
among the
troops
concerned,
including
Commanding
officers were
well aware of
the abuse to
which these
children were
being
subjected. I
also regret to
inform you
that in
addition to
these new 4
cases, there
will likely be
two
more...”.
[We'll have
more on this.]

And there is a
history: this
same Reuters
UN Bureau
Chief Lou
Charbonneau,
when
challenged,
wrote to
Stephane
Dujarric, UN
Spokesman,
trying to get
Inner City
Press thrown
out of the UN,
here.

When
this was
exposed,
Charbonneau
cited Reuters
to get his
email to the
UN taken out
of Google's
search, saying
he never meant
for it to be
public and it
was somehow
copyrighted. (See his filing
here, made
public by
EFF's
ChillingEffects.org).
That's
censorship...
by Reuters.

This
this case,
after being
shown this
reflexive
defense of the
UN was wrong,
Reuters simply
re-wrote the
story and
stole it, with
no credit.

And now
we must go
back:
Charbonneau
announced a
policy of not
crediting
Inner City
Press, see
here.

This was
raised at the
time to
Reuters,
including to
Stephen J.
Adler. What
kind of
company is
this?

(Inner
City Press
previously
asked the
decaying UN
Correspondents
Association, while
it tried to
censor Press
coverage of
its boss,
to promulgate
a best
practice for
media at the
UN to credit
others'
exclusives; it
never
happened. AP
at the UN
speaks for
this UNCA, and
apparently it
for AP.)

In the
email chain
Inner City
Press
exclusively
published,
middle
management at
the UN noted
that the
majority of
sexual abuse
in CAR has
been committed
by the
battalions
from the DRC
and the
Republic of
Congo. And so
Inner City
Press posed
these
questions to
UN
spokespeople
in both New
York and the
CAR:

"This is a
request for
your comment
on, and any
update on, the
sexual abuse
and
exploitation
cases in the
Feb 11, 2016
emails now here

Also, what
will be done
with the
Republic of
Congo and DR
Congo
contingents?
We are
interested in
if the UN and
DPKO can, as
currently be
configured, be
reformed.What
is the status
of the sexual
abuse and
exploitation
cases that
have been
listed,
including in
the UN Press
Briefing
Room?"

The
response
received by
Inner City
Press on
Saturday
afternoon in
New York was
from
Bangui-based
MINUSCA
spokesman
Vladimir
Monteiro:

"On DRC
contingent, a
decision to
repatriate
them has
already been
taken. It will
be completed
without delay
by the end of
the month. It
is just a
matter of
planning it
properly.

"On the 120
troops from
Congo, they
have been
cantoned in
Berberati to
permit
investigations
by national
investigators
before their
repatriation
to their
country
which will
occur on 20
February 2016.
For further
details on
this matter
please contact
HQ."

So
where ARE the
updates on the
cases the UN's
Diane Corner
listed in the
UN Briefing
Room? Why was
it reported in
early January
that the DRC
contingent had
"been
dismissed"
when, in mid
February, they
are still in
place? What is
the status of
the Burundian
contingent in
CAR? Follow up
questions have
been submitted
to UN
officials and
spokespeople
in CAR and
headquarters
in New York.

Well
placed sources
tell Inner
City Press
these two
countries'
soldiers have
been in the UN
MINUSCA
mission nearly
entirely due
to Ladsous
and, more
outrageously,
the / his
French
government due
to its
political
relations with
the Republic
of Congo and
DRC.

Ladsous, as
Inner City
Press has
reported, told
Burundi's Vice
President that
he is
"pragmatic"
about human
rights; even
on camera,
Ladsous linked
the rapes to
"R&R," click here for video.

While
Ladsous' DPKO
and Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
Office of the
Spokesperson
announced that
the DRC
contingent
would be
pulled out of
Bambari and
CAR in late
Janaury, Inner
City Press is
informed this
never
happened: they
are still
there.

Ladsous' DPKO,
and now the UN
Spokesperson's
Office, are
engaged in
misleading the
press and
public, and
doling out
what
information
they provide
to only the
friendliest
media.

For
recent
example, Inner
City Press for
week has
reported on
and asked
about the
repatriation
from CAR of
Burundian
troops charged
with abuse
during the
crackdown on
opponents of
Pierre
Nkurunziza's
third term.
Even after
Inner City
Press obtained
and published
on February 9
proof of
three
repatriations,
all UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric told
Inner City
Press is that
he
would seek an
update.

Simarily,
Ladsous' lead
spokesman Nick
Birnback told
Inner City
Press DPKO
would have
something to
say about the
particular
Burundian
officers in
CAR Inner City
Press asked
him about.

Then
Ladsous'
spokespeople
including
Ismini Palla
gave their
limited
confirmations
to Reuters
and Agence
France Presse,
who published
it without
credit or
context.
(Neither media
reported on
Ladsous
linking rape
to R&R -
nor did AP.)

In a
February email
by UN official
Anthony
Banbury, soon
to leave the
UN after some
heartfelt
tears of outrage
at
peacekeepers'
rapes, it is
said:

"We have a
pack of
predatory
criminals and
rapists,
preying on
young girls,
under the
banner of the
United
Nations. How
can we stand
by? In my view
that battalion
should be
ordered to
cease
operations
today, same
with the RoC
battalion, and
be confined to
camp and
guarded full
time so they
cannot
continue to
abuse
children.
While we would
pay a
short-term
price in terms
of operations,
we would gain
so much in
terms of the
integrity and
reputation of
the UN, in the
CAR and
internationally,
and we would
almost
certainly
prevent more
rapes of minor
girls. We
simply cannot
sustain the
argument that
the benefit
these troops
are bringing
to the UN and
PoC is greater
than the harm
they are
doing."

What
will the UN
do? What will
France, with
new foreign
minister Jean
Marc Ayrault,
do? How long
can Ladsous -
and the
Congolese
contingents -
remain in
place?

Having been
told by
sources of
more rapes by
peacekeepers
in the Central
African
Republic,
Inner City
Press on
January 26 reported
them and on
January 27
asked the UN's
spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric to
confirm them -
but he
wouldn't. UN transcript
here. Video here.

So what
is the
protocol of UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous, who
linked the
rapes to
"R&R," here? How many more do
they know
about?

The UN report
on rapes
in the Central
African
Republic,
released on
December 17,
found that UN
Peacekeeping's
Under
Secretary
General Herve
Ladsous
“illustrate[s]
the UN's
failure to
respond to
allegations of
serious human
rights
violations in
the meaningful
way.”

Ladsous
has yet to
take any
questions
about the
report...

When
the Panel's
three members
held their
December press
conference,
Inner City
Press asked
about Ladsous'
failure to vet
and his
linking of
rapes to
“R&R.” Video here. Marie
Deschamps said
pointedly she
wouldn't
comment on
Ladsous'
remarks;
Yasmin Sooka
said these are
crimes for
punishment,
not
recreation.

As the
last question,
Inner City
Press asked
what it had
wanted to ask
Ban, and tried
to ask
Dujarric: what
does this say
about Ban's
management? Video of Q&A here. Didn't
Ban's chief of
staff
Malcorra,
criticized in
the report, do
it for Ban?
Didn't the
“senior
official” who
ostensibly let
the rape
information
die on the
vine in the
38th floor
work in an
atmosphere
created by
Ban's nine
years? We will
pursue this.