I heard “ Financers “ ready to bet on ppp again but they don’t have actors and singers.

Click to expand...

Could it be that actions have consiquencies formula was finally applies in Pakistan?I mean i clearly dobt recall army giving the Qatari letter nor did arny force NS to take aqama and given false information about aziziya mill which uae govt denied

No elements of fraud or malpractice have been seen in the money trail Imran Khan provided for the purchase of his property in Bani Gala, Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar said on Tuesday.

Heading a three-judge bench hearing a petition against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief, the chief justice also observed that Khan’s arguments regarding how he acquired the land have been consistent.

But all was not good for Khan in the 38th hearing of the case on Tuesday. The bench did observe that Khan has still not produced the complete details of the accounts of his offshore company — Niazi Service Limited (NSL).

READ MORE: Imran Khan hints at another sit in at D Chowk against Panama Leaks
Likewise, the court asked Imran’s attorney Naeem Bukhari to submit details of the expenditure of around £100,000 which was still in the NSL account after payments were made to Khan’s then-wife, Jemima Khan, as the amount was not disclosed by Khan in his annual returns for 2003-04. According to Imran’s counsel, the remaining amount in NSL had been spent on litigation.

I doubt he made billions. Back in those days exchange rate was not what it is today.

Click to expand...

Your FEELINGS (maybe media cell money) against the SC decision hmm i trust the former more just a personal preference
Btw property in Islamabad had a spike in value in early 2000,s price of property doesnot remain the same over 20 years particularly in a city like Islamabad and dont give me lectures about how you know more because i live here

No elements of fraud or malpractice have been seen in the money trail Imran Khan provided for the purchase of his property in Bani Gala, Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar said on Tuesday.

Heading a three-judge bench hearing a petition against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief, the chief justice also observed that Khan’s arguments regarding how he acquired the land have been consistent.

But all was not good for Khan in the 38th hearing of the case on Tuesday. The bench did observe that Khan has still not produced the complete details of the accounts of his offshore company — Niazi Service Limited (NSL).

READ MORE: Imran Khan hints at another sit in at D Chowk against Panama Leaks
Likewise, the court asked Imran’s attorney Naeem Bukhari to submit details of the expenditure of around £100,000 which was still in the NSL account after payments were made to Khan’s then-wife, Jemima Khan, as the amount was not disclosed by Khan in his annual returns for 2003-04. According to Imran’s counsel, the remaining amount in NSL had been spent on litigation.

Your FEELINGS (maybe media cell money) against the SC decision hmm i trust the former more just a personal preference
Btw property in Islamabad had a spike in value in early 2000,s price of property doesnot remain the same over 20 years particularly in a city like Islamabad and dont give me lectures about how you know more because i live here

Click to expand...

Don't waste your time on these Noon League Baboons, they are blind and will stay blind.

No elements of fraud or malpractice have been seen in the money trail Imran Khan provided for the purchase of his property in Bani Gala, Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar said on Tuesday.

Heading a three-judge bench hearing a petition against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief, the chief justice also observed that Khan’s arguments regarding how he acquired the land have been consistent.

But all was not good for Khan in the 38th hearing of the case on Tuesday. The bench did observe that Khan has still not produced the complete details of the accounts of his offshore company — Niazi Service Limited (NSL).

READ MORE: Imran Khan hints at another sit in at D Chowk against Panama Leaks
Likewise, the court asked Imran’s attorney Naeem Bukhari to submit details of the expenditure of around £100,000 which was still in the NSL account after payments were made to Khan’s then-wife, Jemima Khan, as the amount was not disclosed by Khan in his annual returns for 2003-04. According to Imran’s counsel, the remaining amount in NSL had been spent on litigation.

Your FEELINGS (maybe media cell money) against the SC decision hmm i trust the former more just a personal preference
Btw property in Islamabad had a spike in value in early 2000,s price of property doesnot remain the same over 20 years particularly in a city like Islamabad and dont give me lectures about how you know more because i live here

Click to expand...

As far as I know the Supreme court has not announced the judgment yet. You are selecting an article that suits your interests. Here is another news item. Dawn in any case is more credible then TOI.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said that it still remains to be seen where money for Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan's London flat came from.

"We will have to see where the [money for the] London flat came from," Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar, heading a three-judge bench of the apex court, remarked after hearing the rebuttal presented by the counsel for PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi.

The bench was hearing Abbasi’s petition which seeks the disqualification of Imran Khan and PTI secretary general Jahangir Khan Tareen over non-disclosure of assets, existence of offshore companies owned by Imran and Tareen as well as PTI being a foreign-aided party.

Earlier, as he began his rebuttal before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, Abbasi's counsel, Akram Sheikh, brought into question the validity of documents submitted by Imran's lawyer regarding the transfer of funds for the purchase of the Bani Gala property.

In the previous hearing of the case, on September 28, Imran's lawyer, Naeem Bokhari, had sought to respond to the questions put forth by the SC regarding the money trail of the Bani Gala property.

Bokhari had presented documents and a letter sent by the PTI chief's former wife, Jemima, via email before the bench, verifying that Imran had returned to her a sum of Rs6.5 million that she had "gifted to him".

Abbasi's lawyer told the court that the addresses on the documents submitted by Bokhari did not match, alleging that they were not verified.

"If the documents are not verified, what should we do?" the chief justice asked, inquiring if the court had the option of calling for the real documents.

Sheikh also brought into question the £79,000 that he said Imran had paid to the architect of the Bani Gala property.

"Will they [the PTI] not tell us where this amount came from?" Sheikh asked, adding that Imran's lawyer had not submitted documents regarding the matter.

"You are assigning us the role of an account," Justice Umar Atta Bandial said in response to Sheikh's arguments. The judge told the lawyer that he had ventured outside the scope of the case and he should limit his arguments.

London flat
"How much was [Imran's] London flat bought for?" Justice Faisal Arab asked the counsel, questioning if the prosecution had challenged the defence on this matter.

Sheikh told the court that Imran had adopted the position that the Bani Gala property was bought through the sale of the London flat.

He added that Imran has had no source of income in Pakistan and that the PTI chief had accepted that his company Niazi Services Limited had remained functional till 2013.

"We have to see where the [money for the] London flat came from," the chief justice said.

Prosecution raising important questions
Sheikh also maintained Imran had transferred to Jemima a sum larger than the loan he owed her.

"If there is Rs0.1m in the bank account and the expenditure stands at Rs150,000, then there is a need for clarity," the counsel said, explaining his argument.

"The prosecution is raising highly important questions," the chief justice said while addressing PTI's lawyer.

"We will have to look at our jurisdiction to see what kind of verdict can be given," Justice Arab added.

Sheikh said that while he had not raised the question in the court, the petitioner had wondered why the sum had been transferred to Jemima through Imran's cousin, Rashid Khan. He pointed out that Khan had accepted that he had taken a loan from his former wife but had not made this apparent before the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

"Whether it is a father and his son or a husband and his wife, the court has established a precedent," Sheikh said. The former premier was ousted by the SC for not having declared an iqama and a salary that he had received from his son's company.

"If it is proven that Jemima's name was written on the documents regarding the Bani Gala property, I will leave this court room," Sheikh said. "What statement of Imran Khan's should we accept?"

Bani Gala money trail
"Whether Imran returned a loan to his wife or a gift will have to be made apparent," Sheikh said.

"The first thing is where did the money for the Bani Gala property come from?"Justice Bandial asked.

Bokhari, stepping in, told the bench that a few days back, the PTI chief had received the confirmation from the bank, that the SC had sought, verifying that the sum had been transferred to Jemima's account.

The chief justice pointed out that Imran had not declared the Bani Gala property in his nomination papers. "Was it required of him to declare the gift given to him by his wife?" asked the bench.

The chief justice, then, inquired after the details regarding the remaining £99,000 in the bank account of Niazi Services Ltd.

He said that details of the company's bank account provided by the defence earlier had shown the balance to be zero. Later, however, the £99,000 were shown. "We will have to see details regarding the sum," said the chief justice. 'We are reviewing the integrity of a person."

'Imran is no angel'
Shiekh argued that if a loan was pending [on Imran] in 2002, it was necessary for him to declare it.

The paragraph pertained to Capital FZE, the Dubai-based company owned by Nawaz's son Hussain, for which the former premier served as a chairman. The salary from his position had not been declared in Nawaz's nomination papers and therefore, he was disqualified.

"To say that Imran Khan is an angel is not true," Sheikh said.

At the end of the hearing, the chief justice clarified that a verdict had not been reserved in the case and that further documents are to be presented before the court.

The hearing on Imran and Tareen's disqualification case has been adjourned until tomorrow [Wednesday].

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan on Friday submitted in the Supreme Court details of the financial transactions between him and his former wife Jemima Khan.

The details pertain to the transfer of around £562,000 to Jemima from the account of Niazi Services Limited (NSL) — the offshore company of the PTI chief.

The court has also been informed that Jemima sent £79,000 for the design of Imran’s Bani Gala estate.

The details of funds received from Jemima shown in the 2003 nomination papers submitted to the Election Commission of Pakistan are also included in the documents submitted to the court.

Moreover, Jemima’s receipt of funds from the Anglo Irish Bank are also said to have been submitted.

The reply states that after the payment of the loan, the NSL account had £100,000 remaining in it which was spent on legal fees.

There was nothing left in the NSL account which Imran could have shown in his assets declarations/tax returns, the reply states, adding that Imran Khan was an MNA from 2002 to 2007 and in that time period he did not get a penny from the £100,000 nor was it a receivable.

By the time of 2013 elections, the NSL account was empty and thus nothing in it could be shown in the nomination papers for the 2013 elections.

Moreover, in the documents submitted in court, Imran has included two controversial letters said to have different signatures of the PTI chief.

On October 3, during the hearing of the case against Imran, PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi’s counsel argued before the three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar that Imran is guilty of concealing NSL in his nomination papers for the 2002 and 2013 elections, as well as not declaring £100,000 present in the NSL account.

When you don't have an answer the last statement made by PTI burgers is this.

Click to expand...

Lol can you explain what is so lavish about his life style? He has 1 house and he has 1 car, do you consider that Lavish?

As far as source of income, it has been discussed a million times but you guys keep coming back with the same shit. I will answer it the final time and i know that a few days later you will raise the same question.

His only source of recurring income is the agricultural lands that he inherited and royalties from his book sales. he also gets income from public speaking and from cricket commentary but they are not recurring. And thats the reason why his tax returns fluctuate.

Now just tell me 1 thing when was the last time you asked about the exponential growth of wealth of your leaders after they came to power?

Lol can you explain what is so lavish about his life style? He has 1 house and he has 1 car, do you consider that Lavish?

As far as source of income, it has been discussed a million times but you guys keep coming back with the same shit. I will answer it the final time and i know that a few days later you will raise the same question.

His only source of recurring income is the agricultural lands that he inherited and royalties from his book sales. he also gets income from public speaking and from cricket commentary but they are not recurring. And thats the reason why his tax returns fluctuate.

Now just tell me 1 thing when was the last time you asked about the exponential growth of wealth of your leaders after they came to power?

Click to expand...

Considering the size of the house yes it is lavish. In 2016 IK paid Rs. 159,609 tax which indicates his total income was around Rs 1,800,000 to Rs 2,500,000. Even if we consider he earned Rs. 2,500,000 care to explain how he maintains a house of the size he lives in Bani Gala.

He has not done any commentary since 2014 atleast so he has not earned any income from that.

His book is not in demand so royalties won't be much.

His agricultural land. I do not know which crops are cultivated so I don't know how much he earns. The same is not reflected in the tax returns either.

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan on Friday submitted in the Supreme Court details of the financial transactions between him and his former wife Jemima Khan.

The details pertain to the transfer of around £562,000 to Jemima from the account of Niazi Services Limited (NSL) — the offshore company of the PTI chief.

The court has also been informed that Jemima sent £79,000 for the design of Imran’s Bani Gala estate.

The details of funds received from Jemima shown in the 2003 nomination papers submitted to the Election Commission of Pakistan are also included in the documents submitted to the court.

Moreover, Jemima’s receipt of funds from the Anglo Irish Bank are also said to have been submitted.

The reply states that after the payment of the loan, the NSL account had £100,000 remaining in it which was spent on legal fees.

There was nothing left in the NSL account which Imran could have shown in his assets declarations/tax returns, the reply states, adding that Imran Khan was an MNA from 2002 to 2007 and in that time period he did not get a penny from the £100,000 nor was it a receivable.

By the time of 2013 elections, the NSL account was empty and thus nothing in it could be shown in the nomination papers for the 2013 elections.

Moreover, in the documents submitted in court, Imran has included two controversial letters said to have different signatures of the PTI chief.

On October 3, during the hearing of the case against Imran, PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi’s counsel argued before the three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar that Imran is guilty of concealing NSL in his nomination papers for the 2002 and 2013 elections, as well as not declaring £100,000 present in the NSL account.

Considering the size of the house yes it is lavish. In 2016 IK paid Rs. 159,609 tax which indicates his total income was around Rs 1,800,000 to Rs 2,500,000. Even if we consider he earned Rs. 2,500,000 care to explain how he maintains a house of the size he lives in Bani Gala.

He has not done any commentary since 2014 atleast so he has not earned any income from that.

His book is not in demand so royalties won't be much.

His agricultural land. I do not know which crops are cultivated so I don't know how much he earns. The same is not reflected in the tax returns either.

Click to expand...

First you said his lavish life style, now you say that because of the size, his house is lavish. make up your mind.

Now once a house is established what is the cost of maintaining it? Its not like he will be buying new furniture everyday. The max would be electric, gas and water bills.

Correct IK hasn't done much commentary since 2014. But he has done alot of public speaking, as i said before he gets paid for that.

And how do you know that his book is not in demand? plus he has written not 1 but many books, here is a list

And finally show me his 2016 tax returns and i will point to where the agricultural income is shown.

Now just tell me how did the sharif family achieve such an the exponential growth of wealth after they came to power? Also how did teenagers become multi-billionaires while still claiming to be just students?

And finally show me his 2016 tax returns and i will point to where the agricultural income is shown.

Now just tell me how did the sharif family achieve such an the exponential growth of wealth after they came to power? Also how did teenagers become multi-billionaires while still claiming to be just students?

Click to expand...

His lifestyle and house both are lavish. The house the size of IK is not lavish then what is lavish.

Considering the terrain of banigala cost pof maintaining a house of the size of IK is considerable. Remember banigala is not CDA recognized sector so no development is done by CDA. You have to maintain everything even the approach road to the house.

He has written four books and these are not hot cakes anymore. So royalty won't be much. Even if he has earned royalty he still needs to pay tax on it and declare the same in his tax returns.

As far as income from public speaking his income tax return mentions a tax of Rs. 159,609 which falls in the income bracket of Rs 1,800,000 to Rs 2,500,000. I am sure his tax includes the tax paid on income earned outside Pakistan.