especially smaller airports...so low demand....please fix this so we can make proper revenue...we dont want to be in the most popular airports but the scale is so big between demands

Well, that's realistic, IMHO. I'd even say it's already better than reality. Currently playing in MPL, with far more flights than in the real world. I also had bases in remote areas like Visby or Poznan, and could fill them an unrealistic way. If Visby has as much demand as Heathrow, what is the point of playing in Heathrow?

Well, that's realistic, IMHO. I'd even say it's already better than reality. Currently playing in MPL, with far more flights than in the real world. I also had bases in remote areas like Visby or Poznan, and could fill them an unrealistic way. If Visby has as much demand as Heathrow, what is the point of playing in Heathrow?

I think the pax demand generator should have the ability to shift demand among days to allow operations on low demand routes in less times a week. For example, open a route with an average of 7 pax/day (49 pax/week) and, over time, part of the weekly demand shifts to the day you're flying so that you can fill like 25-30 seats in that route. The same thing could be applied for cargo, too.

I think the pax demand generator should have the ability to shift demand among days to allow operations on low demand routes in less times a week. For example, open a route with an average of 7 pax/day (49 pax/week) and, over time, part of the weekly demand shifts to the day you're flying so that you can fill like 25-30 seats in that route. The same thing could be applied for cargo, too.

Yes, itíd be nice to dedicate a once or twice weekly service to low demand LH destinations with 50-70 daily pax demand that can shift to that once weekly frequency and fill a plane on that once weekly flight. It would also require a recalculation to RI of course to maintain desirability.