Abstract [en]

The fossil population structure of the gastropod Neptunea angulata from the late Pliocene and Early Pleistocene was investigated in this project in order to contribute to a wider study on the influence of predation on populations and the evolutionary history of organisms. Over time, predator-prey relationships can drive evolution in a way similar to the Red Queen Hypothesis. However, before the effects of predation can be understood one must determine how the population dynamics functioned without the influence of predation. There are a number of problems that arise when determining population dynamics for fossil assemblages. These are usually caused by missing fossil data and the uncertain nature of their absence. Bias is rife within fossils at various stages from post-portem processes to when they are present in museum collections. One way to estimate these biases is to investigate the population structures of the fossils both directly from the fossil record and from museum collections.

The variation in oxygen istopes found in N. angulata shells corresponded to yearly cycles which then were counted to determine the age of the specimen at time of death. Measuring the length of the spiral at yearly intervals provided the growth rate for the organism while it was alive. The growth rates were then used to determine the ages of specimens based on their size. The resulting ages were organized into an age distribution graph which was used to determine any museum bias. Bias in the preservation was also investigated by measuring the taphonomic damage of organisms of different size and then determine the distributions of size vs taphonomy.

The ages of three specimens were found to differ even though the organisms had similar whorl lengths. As a result the growth equations differed and so different age distributions were calculated from each growth equation. All the age distributions demonstrated that the museum collections did show some bias against the smaller sized and thus younger specimens. There also appeared to be a size bias towards small N. angulata within the fossil record, with the extremely small individuals missing. The majority of the smallest specimens found in the field collections were not actually N. angulata specimens. A major problem with the results was a lack of data and a small sample size and it is highly recommended that an extensive collection and review of material be undertaken to fully determine the population structure present in the fossil assemblages. Other parts of the study, for example, the growth rates also require larger data sets in order for the confidence of the data to be improved.