Screenshots from the key moment in the interview of Ronald Bernard conducted by Irma Shiffer. (Source)Screenshots from the key moment in the interview of Ronald Bernard conducted by Irma Shiffer.(Source)Screenshots from the key moment in the interview of Ronald Bernard conducted by Irma Shiffer.(Source)Screenshots from the key moment in the interview of Ronald Bernard conducted by Irma Shiffer. (Source)

April 29th, 2017.

Amazing Dutch Whistleblower Interview.

A remarkable and very important video emerged on the internet this week. The video is a 39 minute long interview of a man named Ronald Bernard conducted by a journalist named Irma Schiffer.

There are large gaps in the story Ronald Bernard tells and there is no way to corroborate the claims he makes,, the story Bernard outlines is however broadly corroborated by many confirmed and substantiated facts established in recent decades such as the story told by Belgian woman Regina Louf who claimed to have been abused at an elite party in Belgium at which a young girl was murdered.

The police initially regarded Regina Louf as a fantasist until she was able to direct them to the place where the young girls body had been buried and in addition to that the body still bore evidence of the torture the young girl had suffered prior t0 her death as Regina Louf had described.

More on Regina Louf and Belgium’s well documented problem of elite child abuse and murder:

There is nothing new here, and the interview offers no names of people or institutions and therefore does not fall into the category of “too good to be true” at all in my view.

The Ronald bernard account is just another layer of confirmation. One of many. The importance of the story Ronald Bernard tells lies in the fact that we are hearing the story from the other side, an exceptionally rare event.

If people want to believe that Ronald Bernard is making this stuff up, there is no way to disabuse them of that opinion, there is no way to prove that his story is the truth, but having watched the interview there is no doubt in my mind that the story Bernard tells is substantially true.

I urge readers simply to watch the interview and decide for themselves via this link to the video or scroll to the bottom of this page.

Outline.

The story Bernard tells is that he was a smart young businessman, acting as a private financial broker when a senior figure notice his talent and invited him “in” telling him that if he chose this path he would have to learn to “put his conscience in the freezer”.

The insider introduced Bernard to his clients and essentially passed his business onto Bernard in exchange for 10% of the earnings.

The role turned out to be a kind of Mr. Fixit, a middle man laundering money and hiding transactions on behalf of elite bankers and intelligence agencies who require these financial instruments to process and launder the money from their drug, weapon and human trafficking operations.

Bernard learned that intelligence agencies are operating as above the law criminal corporations on behalf of their elite masters. Bernard also learned that senior figures within the financial institutions through which the money was passing knew what was happening.

All in all things were going swimmingly, the fact that he was helping these people to start wars, fund terrorism and launder funds obtained through human and drug trafficking was not a problem.

Ronald Bernard was an atheist at this time also so he was not overly troubled by the knowledge that the elites he was working for worshipped a “different” God than most people, they worship Lucifer.

It is worth noting that some people profess themselves to be “light” or benign Luciferians, that may well be the case, or not, but the people who rule the world today are not of that variety, their Lucifer is the destroyer, the blackening force, the force that craves suffering and violent death, the more the better.

People want to debate the nature of Lucifer, that is fine, but the people who matter, those in power, believe in the evil version, an entity interchangeable with Satan, there should be no mistake about that.

One large gap in the story relates to Bernard’s progress within the cult itself, the story jumps wildly from Bernard being an amused witness to a “Church of Satan” ritual that he describes as involving “naked woman and liquor” to the climax of Bernard’s story and the event that precipitated his physical breakdown and fall from grace within the elite, when Bernard states that he was asked to murder a child within a ritual as a kind of “final binding” to the group.

There must be many steps that take place between being an “amused observer” and that request but the story jumps straight from the observer to the potential murderer, hopefully further interviews will flesh the story out in more detail. .

Downfall and Redemption.

After Bernard’s refusal to murder a child and bind himself to the group irreversibly, Bernard appears to have begun to completely break down, his work performance dramatically declined and at some point the group he had been affiliated with abducted and tortured him to in his words “make sure that I didn’t expose them”

At some point after that Bernard completely collapsed physically, suffered multiple organ failure and woke up in the Intensive Care Ward, he later realised that he must have almost died as when he had been taken to the hospital he had observed himself from above, he had looked down and watched the doctors working on his body.

Bernard interpreted that experience to mean that he was something more than simply his body. That he was more than an intelligent lump of meat and that his essence in some form would survive his physical death.

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

The remainder of the interview is Bernard offering his post breakdown view of the world, one standout moment was perhaps when Bernard baldly states that “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” is an accurate depiction of the world today. Which is true but a rather shocking statement from a modern European.

People who have not read the Protocols completely misunderstand them, they believe that this work is an anti -Jew hate tract, a “warrant for genocide” as one professional liar described it, it is nothing of the sort.

Regardless of questions of authenticity this is the most important thing to understand.

The Protocols are written from the point of view of a Satanist or Luciferian who poses as a Jew. This is merely a front. The narrator is not a Jew and he does not like Jews, he sees them as he sees all other people, as a nuisance, an obstacle and a resource to be exploited, lied to and if necessary, destroyed.

The narrator is not describing a Jewish plot and the Protocols does not in the slightest suggest that all or most Jewish people are part of some evil plot, in fact it states precisely the opposite.

My understanding of the plotters is that they are a coalition of the blackened, so there are people from all backgrounds represented and in each case their job is to subvert the institutions and positions they inhabit for the benefit of the broader cult.

So you must have Christians, they are very important because you need them to destroy Christianity from within, to turn it into a travesty and we have seen this take place in all major Christian denominations and the same principle stands for all groups and institutions.

As far as authenticity goes, in my opinion the Protocols are a doctored document based on very good intelligence, almost all of the text appears to be authentic but some elements seem to have been added in an attempt to flatter and manipulate the Russian Czar to whom it was originally presented.

As many have stated, the authenticity of this document at this point is completely irrelevant, the document describes the world that is being built, how it is being built and the type of people who are doing it, if that is a consequence of a hoax document being embraced and implemented after release or the document was authentic when published in 1903 makes almost no difference at this juncture.

The Protocols describe the program in a very direct and powerful way. Many other (more respectable) works such as “Tragedy and Hope” and “Brave New World” provide similar insights to the Protocols, but both are far longer and far less direct.

It should be remembered that the elite want people to be prejudiced, to be ignorant, to lump individuals into massive groups and condemn them en masse.

It is the height of foolishness to allow yourself to be tricked or manipulated into thinking like that, while it is true that a demographically disproportionate number of the engineers and managers of evil come from a nominally Jewish background, that should never be used to smear anyone because of their family or religious background.

It is also the height of blindness to imagine that the numerous non-Jews who propagate evil and play key roles in the tyranny project are to be somehow swept aside and forgotten.

The final point Ronald Bernard makes is that people must overcome the divide and rule con if they are going to depose these evil forces who currently rule the world.

The interview is deeply moving and although it is conducted in Dutch, the language has so many words that are similar to or the same as English that it is very easy to follow what is being said rather than merely reading it on the screen as is the case with many more distant languages.

Please do yourself a favour and watch this video if you have not already done so. Whilst much on YouTube is ephemera and nonsense, this is the exact opposite

Hampstead, the Finders, Belgium and the Franklin Scandal: the Pattern of Child Abuse Cover Ups.

Hampstead is an apparently very wealthy area of Inner London. The Wikipedia entry reads:

”Part of the London Borough of Camden in Inner London, it is known for its intellectual, liberal, artistic, musical and literary associations It has some of the most expensive housing in the London area. The village of Hampstead has more millionaires within its boundaries than any other area of the United Kingdom “ So there is a lot of extreme wealth in the area.
Several weeks ago a series of gut wrenching videos emerged of two young children describing in detail their sexual abuse, by a number of individuals including their father and staff at the school they attended, including the head teacher.

The videos also detail their involvement in Satanic rituals that on a number of occasions involved the murder of infants. The title of this piece may be slightly hyperbolic given the suppression of the evidence, but all the signs are of a cover up, none are of a hoax and to claim so is to show a terrible ignorance of recent Western history.

If the allegations are properly investigated and turn out not to be true I will be pleased but I know that it is impossible. We have seen this happen too many times before the pattern is clear and there are unmistakeable signs of a cover up of the Hampstead allegations.
Once you get past the troubling initial shock of the extremity of the claims and the fact that the interviews were conducted by an “interested party” in a custody dispute the allegations made in the footage appear to be sincerely believed by the children of their own volition.

I hope these matters are dealt with by the Courts and would not seek to offer pre-judgement. However, after reading the documents, reading excerpts of the police interview with the children that supposedly “resolved” a “misunderstanding”, having read about these cases and the cover-ups from several places in the West in recent decades. I have no doubt that the original horrendous allegations the children made before the September 17th “debunk” interview are based in fact.
The stories the children tell of satanic blood orgies in churches that included murdered babies, are sadly familiar. These cults of evil are actually rather predominant in certain Western societies, it seems.

Given that many people seem to be having trouble coming to terms with these claims of cover up it seemed a good idea to recount some of the more famous and well documented cover ups of similar behaviour in recent times against the Hampstead story and to see whether these new allegations fit into a well established pattern of cover up, not just of child abuse, but more specifically these apparently elite satanic networks of procurers, abusers and blackmailers (influence peddlers may be a more accurate term). For some reason these type of groups have the ability to achieve very aggressive and complete cover-ups for their crimes.

Obvious Cover Ups that Show the Same pattern as Hampstead.

No.1. The “Finders” group members arrested in Tallahasee on February 4th, 1987.

Right at the start of the “Franklin Scandal” by Nick Bryant is a sub-story about a Cult called the “Finders” who were caught with a van-load of very young and severely abused children in Tallahassee during February 1987. Six children aged 3 to 6 were noticed behaving strangely by a concerned citizen who called the police. The children were malnourished and showed clear signs of sexual abuse. It turned out that the children were also not allowed to live inside and only fed as a reward. The group of eight people were living in a white 1979 Dodge van with Virginia plates.

Newspaper article about the Finders after seven years. Disgusted Law Enforcement Officers leaked the truth about the Finders and the CIA, the media had celebrities to interview, couldn’t find the time, other than this.

Two well dressed men were arrested and charged with Felony child abuse. Special Agent Ramon Martinez of the US Customs Service was an investigator assigned to the case. Initially he and a Washington DC Police officer James Bradley made strong progress, receiving a tip off that referred specifically to ” ”blood rituals” sexual orgies involving children and an as yet unsolved murder in which the Finders may be involved.” (Franklin Scandal, Bryant Page 22) and also to two Washington DC warehouses the Finders used.

The warehouses were raided by the police and it seemed that the police had stumbled upon an industrial scale child kidnapping, abuse and trafficking operation. The Finders collected intelligence on babysitters from the local papers. They collected intelligence on child care centres. Photos showed the children and adults together dressed in sheets. The photos depicted the slaughter, disembowelment, skinning and dismemberment of a goat by the children. Police also found jars where human waste was stored, both kinds, it seems they saved it to use in their “ceremonies”.

Special Agent Martinez was set to meet his DC colleague Bradley about one month into the investigation. Upon arrival at the meeting he was told it was cancelled, not the meeting, but the entire investigation! Martinez was “further advised… of circumstances that indicated that the Investigation into the activities of the Finders had become an internal CIA matter.”

Meanwhile in Tallahassee an identical scenario unfolded. “The Tallahassee Police dropped the case like a hot rock!” complained one Tallahassee Officer with knowledge of the case.The media coverage reveals an identical pattern to that seen in Hampstead and so many other places. The first wave of Law enforcement are honest, they take the claims seriously and begin to gather evidence, then magically days or weeks later a new policeman will take charge of the case and will completely backtrack, downplay and sabotage the investigation. On other occasions the same police will have an inexplicable mid-investigation “change of mind.”

In the case of the Finders, initial reports from the Tallahassee Police made mention of “clear signs of sexual abuse”, and “apparent satanism” connected to the abuse, a recurring combination. Six days after the original arrests, a new policeman arrived and now described the child kidnapping and rape cult as a “communal” group. There are “no signs” of sexual abuse suddenly nor of Satanism. Initially the felony charges were downgraded to misdemeanors. The men were released and all charges were quietly dropped six weeks later and incredibly the original six tiny, obviously abused children were returned to their tormentors!

The Finders was a protected CIA front and the whole thing became a total no go area immediately. This was a group acting with the approval of a US intelligence agency. They had approval for what they were doing, which was kidnapping and raping children…at best!! The allegations get much worse than mere child abduction and rape.
All these elements of satanism, child abuse and intelligence agency and media protection are recurring across nations and continents over decades.

Obvious and proven child abuse cover up No.2. Belgium in the 1990’s. The so called Dutroux affair.

Michel Nihoul alleged puppetmaster behind Dutroux. Children were murdered during child abuse parties of which he was the host.

The same type of thing was discovered in Belgium during the 1990’s. The child rapist and sadistic murderer Marc Dutroux, was apparently supported by and consorting with “Secret state” elements in Belgian society and strenuous effort was made by the Belgian authorities to protect the paragon of evil Dutroux and the procurement operations he was running so that unnamed agencies could maintain their “leverage” over various “senior figures.”

When protecting Dutroux was no longer possible, he was hung out to dry and all the efforts, extremely intense efforts were made to protect the men who ran Dutroux, his employers, men like Michel Nihoul who once boasted that,”my influence is as long as the Danube” implying that he was protected by very senior figures within the Belgian power structure.

This passage from Richard Cottrell’s “Gladio NATO’s Dagger at the Heart of Europe” explains how the limited hangout is used to mask these operations when all else fails and someone must be punished. Often the procurer is punished while the broad network remains protected.
“When he (Dutroux) was in trouble once again in 1996, it transpired key police officers knew he was snatching young female victims to order, who were then subjected to sadistic horrors practised in the dungeons of his slum dwellings scattered around Charleroi, or dragged around the vice circuit. But no one moved against him. As many later reports clearly established, his largely accidental exposure tipped the Belgian establishment into a tailspin. At all costs it was essential to divert the public gaze away from the paedophile network organised around Nihoul, the ringmaster, and beam the spotlight instead on Dutroux, who would act the sacrificial scapegoat. This much became blatantly obvious as the glacial Belgian
legal system dragged its heels ever more slowly. The trial was a grotesque charade. Vital evidence, especially any that pointed to Nihoul, was lost or stifled before it came to court. The initial investigating magistrate, Jean-Marc Connerotte, was feted as a national hero when he personally rescued two more kidnapped victims from Dutroux’s cellars. Then, on the specious grounds of taking an informal meal with some of the victims’ families, he was dismissed from the case as ‘biased.’ When the trial finally began and Connerotte was summoned as a material witness, he railed against the bullet-proof cars required to protect him from the vengeance of the secret state.” (Gladio,Cottrell Page 320).

Of special relevance to the Hampstead matter is the story of Regina Louf, a young Belgian abuse victim who the authorities desperately tried to debunk after she made claims of being witness to horrendous acts during elite child abuse parties. Regina Louf was written off as a fantasist but was proven to be telling the truth after the body of a murder victim was found in identical circumstances to her description of the place and manner of death.

The account of the case from “Gladio-NATO’s Dagger at the Heart of Europe” (page 320) is also worth quoting:
“Regina Louf who came forward to testify she had seen her closest girlfriend murdered at one of Nihoul’s wretched parties, was traduced by official spinners and investigating magistrates as an insane liar.[59] The police interrogating team was sacked and replaced by another, which tossed out all her charges. Another side of the same force raided a decrepit mushroom farm specified by Louf and found the dead girl’s remains in exactly the circumstances she described, roped and tied so that she asphyxiated herself during excruciating torture for the amusement of onlookers. It is hard to credit a political system with the slightest perception of civilisation when it refuses to bring the perpetrators of such a horror to justice, particularly when they are known to the authorities”
The account of the investigation of the Regina Louf claims mirrors the Hampstead and Finders pattern almost identically, It is eerie. When the first group of police do their job and get the “wrong answers’ new police must be brought in to get the “right answers”. Whenever these type of allegations are unveiled, they are absolutely “red hot” and every attempt is always made to at least get a “limited hang’ if worst comes to worst and the cover up can no longer proceed.

Belgium’s X-Files – An Olenka Frenkiel Investigation

Example No.3 of the obvious Cover up of Elite Child Abuse

The Franklin Scandal, the USA in the 1980s. Covered up into the 1990s.

If we look to the very well documented Franklin Scandal, one of the truly striking things is the extent to which the Nebraska and Federal Law Enforcement authorities went to intimidate the victims. Several victims were actually imprisoned for making allegations that were complete and proven truth and corroborated by more than a dozen other victims and witnesses.

Alisha Owen was sentenced to 25 years prison for refusing to change her story regarding the Franklin Scandal. Served four and a half years prison for telling the truth about powerful people in Nebraska.

Shamelessness, along with evil is a key characteristic of these people. When caught red handed for totally heinous crimes, most people would fold, would be ashamed, these people are completely the opposite. No matter how obvious their crimes, they deny and deny and deny and use their agents inside Law enforcement to meld reality to their lies. Alisha Owen was sexually abused as a minor by several prominent citizens of Franklin, Nebraska. Alisha Owen served almost half a decade in prison having received a 25 year sentence for perjury for refusing to retract her allegations of having been trafficked by Lawrence E. King and abused by prominent members of the Franklin community, including the local Chief of Police.

Gary Caradori was a prominent investigator employed by the Nebraska Legislature to investigate the claims. He conducted a series of detailed, lengthy and formal interviews with a series of victims. Caradori was former Law Enforcement, a trained Investigator and interviewer with such a high degree of credibility that he was employed by the Nebraska legislature. He was a prominent successful and respected member of the community. The interviews were rock solid, he never coached a witness ever, he was an honest former cop doing an interview cop style. Gary Caradori did such a good job interviewing all the victims of the elite pedophile ring that dark elements in US Law Enforcement apparently chose to assassinate him, sabotaging his plane in Chicago was allegedly a task delegated to the Chicago FBI by their Nebraska brethren. Caradori’s young son also died in the “engineered” mid-air accident.

It was a very obvious assassination. Complete with the obligatory “disappearing briefcase” full of “knock out photographic evidence” according to Nick Bryant who is extremely meticulous. After they killed Gary Caradori the media went to work on his character, tried to paint the man as a “crank” who “badgered witnesses” towards a “predestined conclusion”. GQ magazine wrote a story after he was dead that described him as a “delusional investigator.” a claim of extraordinary mendacity even from the routinely evil commercial Western media.

The interviews Caradori conducted survived and it is absolutely clear that Caradori was the total opposite. He had never heard of this type of thing before and was astonished at what he discovered. Caradori’s interviews with Alisha Owen, Troy Boner and Paul Bonacci are embedded here. Even a brief look at any one of the interviews will make it absolutely clear that the man was completely down to earth and the nonsense spouted by (do they even still exist?) GQ was a deliberate attempt to discredit the overwhelming evidence Caradori accumulated.

Gary Caradori’s Interview with Alisha Owen

Gary Caradori’s Interview with Troy Boner

The destroy Caradori routine really did give new meaning to wickedness. But it worked, or at least delayed justice other than in history. The head pimp to the elite in Nebraska at that time was a fellow named Lawrence E King Jr. he procured children for the other local notables essentially and was also prolific in his personal abuse of young boys. He spent almost a decade in prison for embezzling money from the local Credit Union he ran. King was never prosecuted for his many well documented sex crimes against children.

Lawrence E King, the procurer and child pimp punished for financial crimes. His sexual crimes against children were well documented but it led to too many powerful people.

King was kind of a big deal, supplying children to child abusers in several different areas in the United States. Singing the National Anthem at the yearly Republican party convention. Some of the children he pimped serviced clients in California, Colorado and Washington DC among other spots. King had connections in the prestigious Nebraska boys institution called “Boys-town” he recruited many boys from there and when complaints were made to the Boys-town counselor, he not only covered them up but also proceeded to abuse the victims himself.

Paul Bonacci, victim of Lawrence E King Jr won a million dollar judgement. Sent to Washington DC to work as a child prostitute. Witness to murder.

Paul Bonacci won against Lawrence King in a Civil Court.
Paul Bonacci was one of the younger children that Larry King trafficked and abused, he was only eight years old when it started and was therefore a more highly sought after “product “ than the fourteen and fifteen years olds who were the majority of King’s stable of child prostitutes. This saw Bonacci for example as the only Franklin victim trafficked in Washington DC. Bonacci thus saw more of the network and a more extreme end than the other Franklin victims.

Only Bonacci of the major Franklin witnesses/victims actually managed to achieve a legal victory in a US court when in 1999 a Civil Court found that King had trafficked and abused him, he was a truthful witness and awarded Bonacci a million dollars in damages, none of which he actually received. Lawrence King was a depraved abuser of young boys and girls himself in addition to his procurement role. (There are “beyond credible’ allegations from the 100% no doubt murdered witness and victim Troy Boner, that King violently raped a boy of around ten who was seen to be bleeding afterwards)
Paul Bonacci: THE MURDER -[1985]- GRAPHIC!–!WARNING![![p.4 -subtitled]

Paul Bonacci has told the story of the time he was present at a child sex abuse party where a young boy was murdered. The video depicts a clearly honest and severely traumatised young man and is very upsetting. It’s almost like you have to harden your heart to even be able to look upon these crimes, to hear the stories. This is not uncommon. Because the major media are either in denial or complicit in the cover up of these operations and often sensationalise the claims when they air them, people have no idea it is actually true.
Conclusion.

Hampstead Allegations Sound All Too Familiar.

History Shows a Clear Pattern of Outright Lies.

The History of the Dutroux affair and of Franklin,Tallahassee, Washington DC, Westminster, Portugal; and many other places tells us that every possible attempt will be made to deny and cover up these crimes. A small industry of people exist in order to tell people that “these sort of things don’t happen, it was a false memory” etc. Yet when you look at the known facts in Belgium, in Franklin, in Westminster, it is perfectly clear that there has been a consistent pattern of cover up and massive attempts to discredit honest victims for decades.
If you read the Pedocracy by Dave McGowan, he painstakingly goes through these cases and looks at the evidence, in the Presidio case, in cases where the cover up supposedly succeeded. It is perfectly clear that there is no pattern of fabricated claims on this matter, entirely the opposite. The cover-up is the rule. At certain times people will be convicted of their crimes in relation to these incidents, such as Dutroux, but the existence of the network is never, ever admitted.

If we look at the dark history of the West, in Dolphin Square, in Washington DC, in Belgium with the studied disinterest in Law enforcement in Dutroux for years as he murdered and tortured minors. If the recent history of the West is examined, the Hampstead allegations do not sound outlandish at all, in fact these cases are sadly familiar to even a relative novice in this area such as myself.
The Gulf speaks the silent truth.

One of the ways to try and understand whether a cover up is taking place is to examine the investigation that has taken place and then compare that with what a sincere investigation would look like and the gap between the two, in this case a vast yawning gulf, speaks the truth.

If the children’s video interviews were troubling somewhat due to their being conducted by a party to a custody battle, all doubt was erased by the way the police interview of September 17th proceeded. The police officer conducting the interview appeared to find the allegations so unbelievable that he set out to debunk them as quickly as possible. That is the innocent explanation.

The problem with the interview is very profound and revealing. The police officer showed no intent whatsoever to discover the truth, quite the opposite. The interviewing officer behaved identically to a man sent out to ‘end it and make it all go away, get them to retract”. He actually coached them that they were coached, in an awesome display of hypocrisy and dishonesty.This was quite outrageous in my opinion. It ended all doubt for me. Here is a short excerpt from

“When asked by Steve “we talked in two other interviews…was what you told me the truth?” Gabriel responds “yeah” Steve replies “so all that stuff about the babies, and the church and all that” Gabriel replies “no, well the babies, the babies…there is some of the babies killed yeah” are you sure “yeah, but not much, not every single day…”

This passage is completely transparent. The interviewing officer asks the child if the allegations previously made were correct. The child answers yes, so instead of further questioning to elicit corroborating details, the police officer straight out badgers the child, and being a child he half relents at the first attempt to badger him, stating, “well not every day.” sticking to his story but attempting to please the police officer. So when the badgering continues and the child folds it is completely predictable and has no bearing on the truth of the allegations. It is evidence of a cover-up, pure and simple.

A person seeking the truth would question in a completely different manner.You don’t even ask them about the allegations. They should be asked a series of very easy open questions at the start and not pushed to even talk about the allegations at all.
Once the abuse is mentioned, then you have to ask specific questions. about the details of the event.
This is how you get people to tell you what they know and then test how much of their story fits with the known and corroborated facts.

If these allegations were properly investigated there is a strong likelihood that further forensic evidence can be collected that would corroborate the children’s claims.

The obvious example of this relates to the allegations of murder. Where did these crimes take place? It has to be in London, if this happened it happened inside a room in London and it should be possible to identify the room. It should be possible to search the scene for microscopic blood remnants and other indications of violence at the scene. If the area has been subjected to an inexplicable industrial cleaning recently, the evidence may have been destroyed but there would still be a degree of corroboration there.

There are multiple investigative streams that have not been pursued and after all the known and proven cover ups of these matters in Britain and elsewhere, that is really unforgivable.
You don’t get a young child in the room and then immediately start suggesting the story they previously told was made up. It is simply not how it’s done, unless you are conducting a cover up.

My understanding is that there is abundant physical evidence that proves that the children have been abused by someone, so the whole line of questioning and approach appear to be fraudulent. I also considered that there would be no need or purpose to make such extreme allegations in order to win a custody battle. These allegations do not help win a custody battle, quite the opposite. More importantly, you would not coach someone to tell a story like that to win a custody battle, serious criminal allegations such as murder only complicate things. The same goes for all the allegations about the school. There are too many details that can be checked that appear not to have been checked.

One of the things people may find the most unbelievable are the stories of the murders. I would not comment specifically other than to say they have a high degree of veracity in my opinion and this deserves a serious large scale police investigation right now. A Major Task Force, dozens of Detectives working thousands of hours if necessary. If these stories turn out to be somehow confused or incorrect, let the world know, show the world the exonerating evidence, not some “instant debunk” travesty as we appear to have seen in the Police interview of September 17th. 2014.
We know that horrendous crimes committed against children in the past, in the fairly recent past in the UK, have been covered up. This is the whole point of the Investigation that was set up by the British Home Secretary that has reached it’s third incarnation and gone nowhere in more than a year. It is worth remembering that the police unit investigating the historical Westminster claims are investigating at least three homicides related to protected child abusers during the 1980s. Not that the two very different cases should be conflated.
Therefore, given the gravity and apparent credibility of the allegations one troubling police interview is simply not going to suffice. The specific allegations need to be investigated in detail and prosecuted if they (as seems almost completely certain) turn out to be true.
The effort to expose the crimes in Hampstead has been an heroic one and the personal cost to several people involved in this case has already been immense.
The interviews Caradori conducted in a completely professional manner were alleged to have been entirely coached. This is a common place tactic in these cases, no matter how ridiculous. It was a complete lie but they said it. This points to the problem with the Hampstead videos, they appear to convey and contain the truth but because of the relatively informal nature of the interviews, and more importantly the personal connection of the interviewer to the case, from a legal standpoint they are going to be very easily discounted.
These interviews, regardless of the truth of the allegations therein are not going to be particularly helpful in a criminal prosecution.This is not intended to criticise the interviewer but merely as a statement of fact. The perpetrators will deny to the last so the accounts need to be recorded by a neutral third party who cannot be accused of bias or coaching as soon as possible.

Ideally there should be fresh police interviews of the victims in order to get as detailed an account as possible to check against the known facts. If the police are unwilling to conduct fresh interviews, another neutral party should have the opportunity to ask the children what has happened in detail so that the allegations can be detailed in a neutral environment to an independent third party and corroborative background facts can be properly checked.

Someone needs to get these children on tape at length telling their stories and checking that against the known facts such as the medical reports and action must be taken. Someone has committed a crime here and the police are not going to be able to simply walk away from these allegations on the basis of the inexplicably unprofessional approach taken in the September 17th interview. The days of the simple one step “fob off” cover up are well and truly over.

:Michel Nihoul (Verviers, April 23, 1941) is a Belgian businessman and swindler from Brussels. In 2004 he has been tried as an alleged member of the gang of Marc Dutroux.
Biography
In the seventies and eighties is Nihoul in Brussels known as a frequent visitor to sex parties. He seems to know many senior figures in politics and business. He is also active as a radio producer, DJ and presenter at the free radio “Radio Activités”. In between, he was sentenced several times in fraud cases.
About his part in the activities of Dutroux is far from clear. Initially, he is seen as a gang leader. Later, his role minimized by both researchers and media. It also will not change as Regina Louf makes incriminating statements against him.
At the start of the Dutroux trial is whether Nihoul only a swindler and drug trafficker who “accidentally” did with Dutroux affairs, or that he was the central figure in a pedophile network. He is on trial for conspiracy, kidnapping and drug trafficking. He always boasted that “his arm was as long as the Danube”, referring to its relations to the highest circles of the country.
Nihoul denies any involvement in the kidnappings. He would indeed have sold drugs to Dutroux and Michel Lelievre, but would have done on behalf of the state police to infiltrate the gang – something he denied earlier though.
Nihoul was eventually acquitted of involvement in the kidnapping and only convicted of drug offenses and conspiracy. It earned him five years of imprisonment. In the spring of 2006, he was released early. He settled in Zeebrugge, where he still resides. Three years after the process creates a stir when he is playing in the reconstruction of scenes from the Dutroux case in the TV program Dossier noir of February 18, 2007 at the French-speaking channel RTBF. [1]
Nihoul was on May 20, 2010 from prosecution stated in the by-file of the Dutroux case, after which he immediately 250,000 compensation demanded by Marc Verwilghen, the chairman of the parliamentary inquiry Dutroux. [2] [3] The final judgment on this claim was in December 2011, with the requirement of Nihoul was rejected. [4]
Annie Bouty
Nihoul’s ex-partner and second wife, Annie Bouty, also long been suspected of involvement in criminal activities. Nihoul and Bouty met each other in 1975. She had a private law firm and was co-founder of Cadreco, a firm legal assistance granted to an arms dealer who supplied the Iranian ayatollahs for $ 83 million missiles. [Source?] She also gave false passports to illegal Nigerian prostitutes in Belgium. [Source ?] Bouty was also suspected of involvement in the Dutroux case, but was eventually acquitted.”