Tobias Bredeik, while there is nothing inherently wrong in saying that you like a draft in general, at the drafting stage, critique should be given. For drafts, do give more thought into the draft and advice on what works and what does not.

To say "It is good" or a synonym of the former do not necessarily help the author in enhancing the writing. Elaboration on what works and what does not can help the draft and author.

If you want to include dimensions, do include three dimensions (length, breadth and height) for 3D structures.

Overall, this is an animate origami in the shape of a giant frog which is somehow hostile to humans due to unknown reasons. It is very stale in its current state. Also, you ended up in comparing with other SCPs while not giving your SCP a story. Despite the site's warming up to cross-references, it is still important for your own thing to stand out. And animate objects and hostile SCPs (as individual concepts) have been reproduced many times that those traits will not make the cut.

Thus, I recommend you to consider a context for your SCP. Why would there be an origami in the shape of a frog? Was it a normal origami made gigantic and then animate or vice versa? Was it an origami made by a giant? Is it supposed to be gigantic? Is it supposed to be animate? There are many questions you can ask and many directions to enhance the article.