New Study: Vaccine Manufacturers and FDA Regulators Used Statistical Gimmicks to Hide Risks of HPV Vaccines
A new study published in Clinical Rheumatology exposes how vaccine manufacturers used phony placebos in clinical trials to conceal a wide range of devastating risks associated with HPV vaccines. Instead of using genuine inert placebos and comparing health impacts over a number of years, as is required for most new drug approvals, Merck and GlaxoSmithKline spiked their placebos with a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant and cut observation periods to a matter of months.
Researchers from Mexico’s National Institute of Cardiology pored over 28 studies published through January 2017—16 randomized trials and 12 post-marketing case series—pertaining to the three human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines currently on the market globally. In their July 2017 peer-reviewed report, the authors, Manuel Martínez-Lavin and Luis Amezcua-Guerra, uncovered evidence of numerous adverse events, including life-threatening injuries, permanent disabilities, hospitalizations, and deaths, reported after vaccination with GlaxoSmithKline’s bivalent Cervarix vaccine and Merck’s quadrivalent or nine-valent HPV vaccines (Gardasil and Gardasil 9). Pharmaceutical company scientists routinely dismissed, minimized or concealed those injuries using statistical gimmicks and invalid comparisons designed to diminish their relative significance.
“Of the 16 HPV vaccine randomized trials, only two used an inert saline placebo. Ten of the sixteen compared the HPV vaccine against a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant.”
Scientific researchers view double-blind placebo trials as the gold standard for testing new drugs. To minimize bias, investigators randomly assign patients to either a “treatment” group or a “control” (placebo) group and then compare health outcomes. The standard practice is to compare a new drug against a “pharmacologically inert” placebo. To minimize opportunities for bias, neither patients nor researchers know which individuals received the drug and which the placebo. However, in clinical trials of the various HPV vaccines, pharmaceutical researchers avoided this kind of rigor and instead employed sleight-of-hand flimflams to mask the seriousness of vaccine injuries.
Of the 16 HPV vaccine randomized trials, only two used an inert saline placebo. Ten of the sixteen compared the HPV vaccine against a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant, and four trials used an already-approved aluminum-containing vaccine as the comparison. One does not have to be a scientist to understand that using aluminum-containing placebos is likely to muddy the comparison between the treatment and control groups.

Study: Cervical cancer vaccine may not be cause of health issues
A national survey conducted in response to mysterious health problems that girls and young women say were suffered after cervical cancer vaccinations has found that unvaccinated teenagers have reported similar symptoms in comparable numbers.
The results of the study were reported at a health ministry’s cervical cancer vaccine review committee meeting on Dec. 26.
The investigation was conducted by a health ministry research team headed by Tomotaka Sobue, a professor of public health at Osaka University.
The team asked about 18,000 clinics and hospitals in Japan whether they received female patients aged between 12 and 18, during the six-month period of July to December 2015, who complained of certain symptoms, including unexplained body pains and mobility problems, which persisted for more than three months.
The study also asked about the degree to which the patients were affected by the conditions and whether they have difficulty in commuting to school or work.
Analysis of the health-care providers’ responses showed that the ratio of girls who had the cervical cancer vaccination and reported those conditions was 27.8 per 100,000 people. By comparison, the ratio was 20.4 per 100,000 people for the unvaccinated girls experiencing the conditions.
The survey was undertaken to provide evidence to help determine whether active promotion of the cervical cancer vaccinations, which has been halted since 2013, should be resumed.

Why flu vaccines so often fail
By Jon CohenSep. 20, 2017 , 2:30 PM
The influenza virus has yet to hit the Northern Hemisphere, but flu vaccine season is already in full swing, with banners outside pharmacies urging: “Get Your Flu Shot Now.” What’s not advertised, however, is just how lackluster the vaccine is. The most commonly used flu shots protect no more than 60% of people who receive them; some years, effectiveness plunges to as low as 10%. Given that a bad flu season can kill 50,000 people in the United States alone, “10% to 60% protection is better than nothing,” says Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. “But it’s a terribly inadequate vaccine for a serious public health threat.” Now, researchers are striving to understand why it fails so often—and how to make a markedly better one.
They’re questioning what was once received wisdom: that the vaccine fails when manufacturers, working months ahead of flu season, incorrectly guess which strains will end up spreading. And they’re learning instead that the vaccine may falter even when the right strains were used to make it, perhaps because of how it is produced or quirks of individual immune systems. “It’s much more complicated than we thought,” Osterholm says. “I know less about influenza today than I did 10 years ago.”

Measles Virus Neutralizing Antibodies in Intravenous Immunoglobulins:is an Increase by Re-Vaccination of Plasma Donors possible?
Abstract
We report a screen of plasma donors which confirmed that widespread use of childhood measles vaccination since 1963 resulted in a decrease of average measles virus antibody titers in plasma donors, which is reflected in intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG). The measles virus antibody titer is, however, a potency requirement for IVIG, as defined in FDA regulation. To mitigate the decline in measles virus antibody titers in IVIG and to ensure consistent product release, re-vaccination of plasma donors was investigated as a means to boost titers. However, re-vaccination induced titer increases were only about two-fold, and short lived.

Warning: Some people may find the information in this article disturbing and the images graphic.

Every year, some infants are circumcised. During this surgical procedure, part of the child’s protective penile tissue is removed. This tissue removed from his penis may be sold to companies and institutions seeking the rich human fibroblast cells and other cells it contains. Most people are unaware that for decades, vaccine companies have been using these foreskin cells to research, grow and develop vaccines.
Certain microorganisms used by vaccine companies need living human cells to replicate. The cells within foreskin are being used for this purpose. Foreskin cells can be used to turn a wild-type microorganism found in nature into a genetically modified microorganism for use in vaccines.
Baby foreskins are used to research rubella, varicella and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. They are used to make cytomegalovirus vaccines, which is something pharmaceutical companies have been working on the last few decades. This vaccine is being created using foreskin cells and clinical trials have already begun. The child’s DNA whose foreskin was used to make the vaccine cannot be fully removed from the vaccines prior to administration. Researchers are also using foreskin to create a human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) immortalized cell line for use in vaccines.
Cells isolated from infant foreskin are preferred because the infant cells have a longer lifespan than those isolated from adult foreskin. The ongoing issue with companies using infant foreskin to develop vaccines and other products is vast; only a small fraction can be discussed here. It is important to research how vaccines are made prior to receiving them, if you want to avoid unwanted contaminants in your body.

Doctor Who Warned Families About Vaccine Dangers, Found Dead Body of missing Dr. Peter Cianfrani found by searchers
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle on 28th September 2017
A doctor who warned families about the dangers of mandatory vaccines has been found dead a day after he was reported missing. The body of Dr. Peter Cianfrani, 70, was discovered by search teams on Wednesday morning just off of the Perkiomen Trail in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. The longtime family doctor, who disappeared Tuesday was discovered in an isolated woodland area near a trail by searchers. The Perkiomen Trail is a 19-mile-long multi-use rail trail along the Perkiomen Creek, with the trail mostly being gravel. Although the trail is popular with hikers, it’s unclear why Dr. Cianfrani was up there or why his body was found in a wooded area away from the trail. The cause and manner of death are pending although police claim that his death is most-likely a suicide and won’t be investigated as “suspicious”. Dr. Cianfrani had worked in Montgomery County as a medical practitioner for years and was a well-trusted family doctor.

Metro Detroit mom could be thrown behind bars for not getting son vaccinated
Andrea Isom
11:14 PM, Sep 27, 2017
(WXYZ) – If you have kids, their health, their safety is your top priority.
However, what if doing what you think is best, could land you behind bars?
A Metro Detroit mother is facing jail time because of her beliefs when it comes to vaccinations and her kid.
“I would rather sit behind bars standing up for what I believe in, than giving in to something I strongly don’t believe in,” says Rebecca Bredow.
Bredow, a mother of two, has one week to get her son vaccinated and if she does not comply with the order of an Oakland County judge, she will be thrown in jail.
Rebecca believes in parents having the choice to make the right decision for their children based on the parent’s knowledge of vaccines and the child

Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis Than Wild Polio
June 28, 2017
For the first time, the number of children paralyzed by mutant strains of the polio vaccine are greater than the number of children paralyzed by polio itself.
So far in 2017, there have been only six cases of “wild” polio reported anywhere in the world. By “wild,” public health officials mean the disease caused by polio virus found naturally in the environment.
By contrast, there have been 21 cases of vaccine-derived polio this year. These cases look remarkably similar to regular polio. But laboratory tests show they’re caused by remnants of the oral polio vaccine that have gotten loose in the environment, mutated and regained their ability to paralyze unvaccinated children

Study – IgE sensitization to gelatin: the probable role of gelatin-containing diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines
Abstract
We recently found that most events of anaphylaxis to live attenuated viral vaccines containing gelatin as a stabilizer might be caused by the gelatin. However, the mechanism that the children were sensitized to gelatin was unclear. In Japan, both diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines with and without gelatin are available. We explored the possibility that gelatin-containing DTaP vaccines before live viral vaccines sensitize children to gelatin. We received the serum samples of 87 children who had systemic immediate-type reactions including anaphylaxis to the vaccines from both physicians and vaccine manufacturers throughout Japan. We then surveyed the DTaP vaccination histories of the children who demonstrated anti-gelatin IgE. Of the above 87 children, 79 (91%) had anti-gelatin IgE. We successfully collected DTaP vaccination histories including the manufacturers’ names and numbers of doses on 55 children. Only one child had not received any DTaP vaccine, the other 54 had received gelatin-containing DTaP vaccines and none received gelatin-free DTaP vaccines. We concluded that there was a strong causal relationship between gelatin-containing DTaP vaccination, anti-gelatin IgE production, and risk of anaphylaxis following subsequent immunization with live viral vaccines which contain a larger amount of gelatin.

Education and awareness is the first step towards INFORMED CONSENT and the avoidance of these tragedies that are not as rare as we’ve been told … Register here now for this groundbreaking series
➤➤➤ tinyurl.com/9Episodes
➤Networking, exemption information and doctor resources: tinyurl.com/RevolutionForVaccineChoice
➤Follow us: facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice
➤Read all vaccine inserts: tinyurl.com/ReadTheVaccineInsert#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED #Flu #VaccineInjury

A SHOCKING report on the researchers whose financial conflicts of interests are currently at war with trustworthy scientific study. Experts are declaring that HALF of all scientific literature may be untrue!
What else aren’t you being told, especially when it pertains to what is being injected into your child? Think vaccines are safe? Find out here, for free: tinyurl.com/9Episodes
✴️ Networking, exemption information and doctor resources: tinyurl.com/RevolutionForVaccineChoice
✴️ Follow us: facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice
✴️ Read all vaccine inserts: tinyurl.com/ReadTheVaccineInsert#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED #FakeScience #BigPharma #CDCWhistleblower

“Most people have been bullied by people who claim to speak in the name of science.” Watch more with Rupert Sheldrake: http://ow.ly/lt1Z30e07RA

L’ONDA LUNGA PER LA LIBERTÀ DI SCELTA SUI VACCINI
Un interminabile corteo di famiglie per la libertà di vaccinazione ha affollato ieri sera le vie di Bolzano al grido : “Libertà” dopo il via libera alla Camera dei Deputati all’obbligo di vaccinazione per l’iscrizione dei figli nelle scuole
The long wave for freedom of choice on vaccines
An endless parade of families for the freedom of vaccination took place last night in the streets of bolzano to the cry: “freedom” after the free pass to the house of members of the of the of children in schools

Brief Report: What Happens When I Can No Longer Support My Autistic Relative? Worries About the Future for Family Members of Autistic Adults.
Abstract
Very little is known about autism and adulthood. Family members are often the primary support for autistic adults and frequently express concerns about what the future will hold and what support will be available for their relative. 120 family members of autistic adults completed an online survey exploring concerns about the future for their relative. The most endorsed concerns were “their needs won’t be met” (77% worried weekly), “whether they will be happy” (72% worried weekly) and “who will care for them” (58% worried weekly). The results highlight the importance of implementing structured and timely support through collaboration with governmental policy, local commissioning and communication with charities to help prepare family members and their autistic relative for the future.

Patent Reveals Plan To Hide Vaccines In Food Particles
July 28, 2017
A disturbing patent discovered this week reveals plans to hide vaccines within food particles without the public knowing about it.
US Patent application ‘US20080044481 A1’ (“Microparticles for oral delivery”) was filed in 2005, and allows drugs and vaccines to be embedded into tiny invisible particles of food.
Are we to assume the technology hasn’t yet been applied?
Is it operating at a stealth level? I’ll try to answer these questions in a minute. But first:
Patent Reveals Plan To Hide Vaccines In Food Particles
The inventor and assignee is listed as Mordechai Harel, who was associated with Advanced BioNutrition Corporation of Columbia, Maryland. Here are a group of quotes from the patent application. The statements leave no doubt about the wide, wide application of the technology.

Microparticles for Oral Delivery – US patent 20080044481 A1
Abstract
The invention provides microbeads containing oil-associated biologically active compounds and methods for their manufacture and use. The microbeads consist of a soluble complex of non-digestible polymer and emulsifier with oil-associated biologically active compounds embedded in a matrix of digestible polymer. The disclosed microbead complex protects the biologically active compounds, such as vitamins, fish oil and carotenoids, from oxidation, taste and odor degradation. The disclosed microbeads also provide protection from the stomach digestive distraction, and allows for the delivery of the biologically active compounds in the intestine.

Truth from “a real doctor” about vaccines, both medically and the business of running a medical clinic without accepting the bribes for vaccinating children.

Six doctors who have administered vaccines in their practice are all asked the same question. When you were in medical school, how much education regarding vaccines was provided before you were permitted to administer them?
Interviews, camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.

Newborn baby dies after receiving eight vaccinations on schedule; pathologists confirm vaccines responsible for death
A mother from Michigan has gone through an emotional journey in finding exactly what caused her son to mysteriously die.
What she uncovered is another case added to the excessive vaccination-induced early death.
Elijah Daniel French was born on May 4, 2007, and had mysteriously died a couple days after receiving 8 routine vaccinations, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for childhood vaccination. This was determined by child death investigator and many pathologists to have been a result from vaccination.
According to VacTruth.com: Baby Elijah was happy, healthy, and smiling until he underwent routine vaccinations. His health began to worsen, and ended up developing a high fever and breathing problems.
In the family account, it was noted that Danny had been vaccinated for seven other conditions at 5 1/2 months old, including hepatitis B, DTaP, Hib, pneumococcal and polio vaccines. To make things worse, a few months later he was brought over to the doctor’s office where he was administered a second round of the same vaccines. This caused him to develop asthma and exacerbated his problems even more.
Daniel’s mother didn’t know what else to do, other than see a doctor for her Childs condition. So, she brought Daniel back to the doctor’s office where ehe was given a third round of vaccines at 14 months old. He was administered 8 vaccines in 4 injections: Varicella, Hib, DTaP and MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella). This is when Daniel’s started to dramatically worsen.
“That night, Danny was still eating and drinking but was cranky and slept more than usual,” his mother reported.
“By the next day, he was extremely fatigued, irritable and had a loss of appetite. He did not have a fever at this time. He was red and warm where they injected him. These symptoms only worsened.”
“By the third day, Danny was unable to stay awake for longer than thirty minutes, he had zero food intake, his fluid intake diminished and he cried excessively. Seventy-one hours after his doctor visit, Danny developed a fever from the vaccines and was given Children’s Tylenol. His doctor was called but there was no answer from him because it was the July 4th holiday, the office was closed.”
Three independent pathologists confirm that young Danny’s death was caused by vaccines

Infant Accidentally Vaccinated with Gardasil – Mother Blamed for Vaccine Injuries and Baby Medically Kidnapped
June 29, 2017
by Health Impact News/MedicalKidnap.com Staff
Doctors call it a “medication administration error.” During a routine check-up at her pediatrician’s office, 4-month old Aniya was accidentally given the Gardasil 9 vaccine, and she hasn’t been the same since.
Anita Vasquez of Victoria, Texas, herself a nurse, says that “doctors are in denial” that any of the medical issues that began after her daughter received the shot are related to the vaccine.
Aniya was a happy and healthy breastfed baby before her 4-month doctor visit. Her only illness was an ear infection which had been cleared up with antibiotics shortly before that fateful day of December 29, 2016. Since then, she has suffered numerous health issues and several hospitalizations.
Rather than acknowledge the possibility that the Gardasil 9 vaccine contributed to the decline in Aniya’s health, doctors and Child Protective Services have reportedly blamed the mother. Her desperate search for answers has led instead to her being accused of Munchausen by Proxy, or “medical child abuse,” and her baby has been seized by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS).
Anita told Health Impact News that her concerns about the vaccine have been dismissed and ignored by virtually everyone involved in her daughter’s care. DFPS refers to her “unfounded concerns” about the Gardasil 9 vaccine. She believes that they are trying to cover up the dangers of the vaccine.
This is any mother’s worst nightmare, and no one deserves this.
Distracted Doctor Administers Wrong Vaccine – Infant Received 8 Vaccines at Same Visit
The Vasquez family nightmare began when Anita took her 13 year old son and her 4 month old baby girl to a routine check-up.
Anita is a registered nurse by trade, and she didn’t question the recommended vaccinations. Her son was to receive the Gardasil 9 vaccine, and her daughter was to receive 2 shots and an oral vaccine. The nurse drew up and labeled the vaccines and placed the syringes in a single envelope.
Anita says that Dr. Veronica Guel-Valdivia came into the room talking on her cell phone. When the doctor finished her phone conversation, she asked Anita to put baby Aniya on the table.

Polio Paralyzes 17 Children in Syria, W.H.O. Says
Unlike Syria’s first polio outbreak in 2013, caused by a wild strain that paralyzed 36 children before it was brought under control, the new outbreak derived from the polio vaccine itself, Mr. Jasarevic said.
The vaccine, a weakened form of the polio virus that triggers the immune system’s response, is secreted in the waste of vaccinated children, and over time can mutate into an infectious strain that may afflict the unvaccinated. The risks are especially high in areas where not all children have received the vaccine and where the mutated virus can spread from contaminated sewage or water.
“These vaccine-derived outbreaks really are a marker of poor vaccination and poor sanitation in the community,” said Dr. Homer Venters, director of programs at Physicians for Human Rights, an international aid group based in New York that supports humanitarian work in war zones, including Syria and Yemen.

After receiving a flu shot, this beautiful young girl suffered vaccine-induced paralysis, also known as Transverse Myeltis, one of many labels given to our modern-day “Polio”, which was never eradicated by vaccines and in fact, is many times directly caused by them.
What else aren’t you being told? Find out here, while this groundbreaking, 9-part docu-series is still free>>> tinyurl.com/9Episodes
Guillain-Barré Syndrome is another label given to this paralysis, very often caused by vaccines.
More info here: vactruth.com/2012/04/25/change-names-of-diseases
✴️ Networking, exemption information and doctor resources: tinyurl.com/RevolutionForVaccineChoice
✴️ Follow us: facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice
✴️ Read all vaccine inserts: tinyurl.com/ReadTheVaccineInsert#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED #Polio #TransverseMyelitis #VaccineInjury

Flu Vaccine Efficacy Slips From Prior Estimate, CDC Says
Robert Lowes
June 23, 2017
The influenza vaccine for the 2016-2017 season was 42% effective in preventing an infection from any A or B virus in people of all ages, down from a preliminary estimate of 48% in February, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced earlier this week.
The CDC frames the effectiveness rating in terms of reducing a vaccinated person’s risk of getting sick and having to visit a clinician on an outpatient basis because of the flu.
The vaccine worked the best among children aged 6 months to 8 years, at 61%, and the least among individuals aged 18 to 49 years, at 19%. For people aged 65 years or older — a demographic group that’s especially vulnerable to the flu — effectiveness stood at 25%.
The CDC reported the efficacy rates at a meeting of its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in Atlanta, Georgia, on June 21 and 22.
Vaccine effectiveness varied considerably by influenza virus type. It was at its lowest in all age groups — 34% — for the A/H3N2 virus that dominated this season. Performance picked up for the A/H1N1 pandemic virus (54%), the B/Yamagata virus (55%), and the B/Victoria virus (60%), according to epidemiologist Jill Ferdinands, PhD, in the CDC’s Influenza Division.
The CDC adjusts its efficacy estimates for such factors as age, sex, and underlying medical conditions.
The 42% overall effectiveness of the latest influenza vaccine is somewhat lower than the 47% for the 2015-2016 vaccine, but a big improvement over the 23% for the 2014-2015 edition. Vaccine performance suffers when the viruses they’re designed to thwart undergo genetic drift after the vaccine is formulated. However, the CDC reported that most of the flu viruses in circulation in 2016-2017 were similar to those in the latest vaccine, which came in trivalent and quadrivalent formulas.

The prenatal flu vaccine and ASD: Good research, bad conclusions.
Brian S. Hooker, Ph.D.
June 23, 2017
Very early this year, a research group from the insurance giant Kaiser Permanente published a paper concluding no evidence of harm in administering prenatal influenza vaccines. The study authors asserted that there was no relationship between those who received the flu shot during pregnancy and later autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis in the child. However, that proclamation was not consistent with the study’s results. Specifically, women who received the vaccine during their first trimester of pregnancy showed a 20% greater risk of having the child later develop ASD. This was based on a sampling of 13,477 women who received the maternal flu shot in the first trimester, resulting in 260 ASD cases, versus 151,698 “control” women who received no flu shot during pregnancy, resulting in 2,338 ASD cases. This result was statistically significant with a p value of 0.01, which in this case means that the possibility that this is a “chance” finding and not a “true” association was just 1%. In other words, the chances of this being a “true” association are 99%.
In statistics, the gold standard “cut-off” to determine statistical significance is actually a higher p value of 0.05, meaning that the possibility of a chance association is less than 5%. Thus, the first trimester flu shot – ASD relationship should have been deemed statistically significant, with p=0.01, and accordingly a policy change should have been made to suspend use of that vaccine, at least in the first trimester of pregnancy.
However, the study authors instead reached into their statistical “bag of tricks” and trotted out what is termed the “Bonferroni” adjustment. This adjustment is applied in statistics only under very specific instances, when multiple, unrelated statistical evaluations are made using a single data sampling. In this adjustment, simply, the p value is adjusted by multiplying its original value with the number of “independent” evaluations completed in the study of that single data set (Bland et al. 1995 BMJ 310:170). In the case of Zerbo et al. 2017, there were 8 evaluations completed (4 evaluations regarding the flu shot and 4 evaluations regarding women who actually contracted the flu during pregnancy) and thus the original p value of 0.01 was adjusted to 0.08, above the “cut off” value used for deeming “statistical significance.” The Zerbo et al. authors rounded the result up to p=0.1, further moving the result away from the “magic” 0.05 cut-off level, causing the significant result to disappear.
There’s a huge problem here, however, which I pointed out in my letter to the editor of the journal (Hooker 2017 JAMA Pediatrics 171:600) published in their June 2, 2017 edition. The Bonferroni adjustment, among other corrections for multiple, independent comparisons, should not be applied to statistics when there is any interdependence within the different evaluations completed within the data sample. In this case, 4 of the evaluations completed dealt specifically with the timing of the maternal flu shot (first, second and third trimesters, as well as overall risk at any point in pregnancy) and subsequent ASD incidence. So, not only were these four trials all focused on an ASD outcome, but they all dealt with different phases of pregnancy, which were then summed to develop an “overall” risk at any phase of pregnancy. By definition, these trials were anything but statistically independent. An example of an independent evalution would be polling different groups of college students for their tastes in music, food, art, and perhaps health care practices, where none of the preferences could be empirically tied to the next.

Don’t Vaccinate to Protect My Cancer Kid
Posted on February 10, 2015
I read with great interest the recent ‘measles epidemic’ articles that addressed the vaccine debate from the point of view of a cancer parent. My interest is the result of being a cancer parent myself – my little girl has been battling leukemia on and off for the past 10 years. I read these articles, and I became angry. Very, very angry. Once again, the government and drug companies are exploiting the plight of children stricken by cancer to achieve a profit-driven end without actually helping them. In fact, this profitable end could cause great harm, even increasing the rates of pediatric leukemia, if their obvious goal of a federally mandated vaccination protocol is achieved. I am a seasoned Momcologist, a term the research-driven cancer parents call themselves. We are the cancer equivalent of Thinking Moms, critical thinkers. I have done extensive reading on the etiology of leukemia, its connection to autoimmune disease, and how vaccines and natural disease may influence these sorts of childhood illnesses. Come connect the dots with me.
Clearly, I empathize with the raw fear the parents in these articles have that their immunocompromised children may contract an illness that could be devastating. I have walked for years in their shoes. I get it. However, the parents in these articles are either grossly misinformed, or their comments have been edited with bias. Let’s get some facts straight about cancer treatment and infection. One of the first things we were warned about after my daughter’s diagnosis was live-virus vaccination. No one in the family was to receive a live-virus vaccine while my daughter was on treatment because these viruses can and do shed (1, 2, 3, 4), some for as much as four weeks (5), potentially infecting the immunocompromised patient with disastrous results. That includes the measles vaccine (MMR II and ProQuad), the intranasal flu vaccine, and the chicken pox shot. In fact, my other children were able to get medical waivers not to receive vaccines because of my daughter’s illness. I know my child is much more likely to encounter a peer at school who has been recently vaccinated with a live-virus vaccine than she is to encounter natural disease from an unvaccinated child.

Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis Than Wild Polio
June 28, 20173:22 PM ET
For the first time, the number of children paralyzed by mutant strains of the polio vaccine are greater than the number of children paralyzed by polio itself.
So far in 2017, there have been only six cases of “wild” polio reported anywhere in the world. By “wild,” public health officials mean the disease caused by polio virus found naturally in the environment.
By contrast, there have been 21 cases of vaccine-derived polio this year. These cases look remarkably similar to regular polio. But laboratory tests show they’re caused by remnants of the oral polio vaccine that have gotten loose in the environment, mutated and regained their ability to paralyze unvaccinated children
“It’s actually an interesting conundrum. The very tool you are using for [polio] eradication is causing the problem,” says Raul Andino, a professor of microbiology at the University of California at San Francisco.
The oral polio vaccine used throughout most of the developing world contains a form of the virus that has been weakened in the laboratory. But it’s still a live virus. (This is a different vaccine than the injectable one used in the U.S. and most developed countries. The injectable vaccine is far more expensive and does not contain live forms of the virus.)
Andino studies how viruses mutate. In a study published in March, he and his colleagues found that the laboratory-weakened virus used in the oral polio vaccine can very rapidly regain its strength if it starts spreading on its own. After a child is vaccinated with live polio virus, the virus replicates inside the child’s intestine and eventually is excreted. In places with poor sanitation, fecal matter can enter the drinking water supply and the virus is able to start spreading from person to person.
“We discovered there’s only a few [mutations] that have to happen and they happen rather quickly in the first month or two post-vaccination,” Andino says. “As the virus starts circulating in the community, it acquires further mutations that make it basically indistinguishable from the wild-type virus. It’s polio in terms of virulence and in terms of how the virus spreads.”

New Polio Virus Evolution Insights Could Lead to Improved Vaccine
Blocking ‘Gateway Mutations’ Could Prevent Vaccine from Re-Evolving Virulence
By Nicholas Weiler on March 27, 2017
A relentless vaccination campaign has succeeded in eradicating the polio virus from most of the world, reducing the burden of the disease by 99 percent since the year 2000 and preventing more than 13 million children from contracting the disease, according to World Health Organization estimates. However, in regions where vaccination has remained incomplete, on rare occasions the weakened virus used in the vaccine has evolved the ability to escape the vaccinated person and spread to other, unprotected individuals.
Now a new study led by researchers at UC San Francisco and Tel-Aviv University in Israel has revealed that in every vaccine-derived polio outbreak, the polio virus used the same three evolutionary steps to evolve from harmless vaccine into a regional menace. In the new study – published online March 23, 2017, in Cell – the researchers mapped out these key steps, identifying so-called “gatekeeper mutations” that must occur before the vaccine can evolve and regain full virulence. They have used this knowledge to develop a new polio vaccine that should be unable to escape and cause outbreaks, which they hope to put into clinical trials soon.
“If one could get everyone fully vaccinated, this would prevent the virus from being able to spread and evolve, but particularly in areas of the world that are riddled with conflict and poverty, it is very hard to get full coverage,” said Raul Andino, PhD, a professor of microbiology and immunology at UCSF and senior author of the new study. “Thus, it has been critical to understand how the virus manages to evolve virulence, and come up with strategies to stop it.”

Official Push to Hide Drug & Vaccine Side Effects; Reduce Informed Consent
Posted on: Monday, June 26th 2017 at 3:45 pm
Written By: Jefferey Jaxen
In a disturbing turn of events, Big Pharma pushes to hijack informed consent by removing side effects from direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising.
Direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising (DTCPA) has exploded during the past several decades and is now the most prominent type of health communication the public encounters. DTCPA has been legal in the US since 1985, but exponentially expanded in 1997 when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) changed a rule that once forced drug companies to offer a detailed list of side-effects in their long format commercials. The impact was immediate. Spending by drug companies on TV ads hit $664 million within a year. By 2005, the industry was spending more than $3 billion annually on televised direct-to-consumer (DTC) ads. 2008 saw Big Pharma post just under $5 billion. Spending on DTCPA rose 9% to $5.6 billion in 2016 and expected to rise further in 2017. To date, the US and New Zealand are the only two countries that allow DTCPA.
In what appears to be a coordinated effort both the FDA and the UK’s Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) have each announced their intentions to hide or eliminate side effects from DTCPA and patient information leaflets (PIL). Lending credence to larger picture unfolding, both the FDA and the AMS announced their intentions to toy with further concealing drug and vaccine side effects on the same day [June 19].
Hijacking Informed Consent
The FDA announced it will begin a study titled Experimental Study of Risk Information Amount and Location in Direct-to-Consumer Print Ads. To fulfill the regulatory requirements for fair balance and the brief summary (the part of the ad which lists side effects, contraindications and effectiveness) drug companies must included risk information about their product in DTC print ads both in the main part of the ad where the product claims appear, and in a separate brief summary page. The FDA’s rationale for its new study claims that listing the unfavorable risks and side effects of a drug may be ‘overwarning’ consumers in addition to potentially leading to habituation. The agency’s Office of Prescription Drug Promotion is planning to test what happens when the side effects are reduced or eliminated from DTC television ads.
The AMS is a self-proclaimed “independent body in the UK representing the diversity of medical science” who, according to their website, is funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Roche. Their recent project was “…to examine how the generation, trustworthiness and communication of scientific evidence can be enhanced [key term] to strengthen its role in decisions by patients, carers, healthcare professionals and others about the benefits and harms of medicines.” In other words since the UK can’t market drugs and vaccines directly to the consumers the AMS has set out to see how eliminating informed consent by hiding product side effects from patients will boost pharmaceutical product uptake. Their report starts out with perhaps the most important statistic to date showing widespread rejection of Big Pharma and its influence on the medical community:
“Only about a third (37%) of the public trust evidence from medical research, compared to approximately two-thirds (65%) who trust the experiences of their friends and family, according to a report launched today.”
In a rational health world focused on true healing, such dismal percentages would be evidence to rework a broken medical system, remove Big Pharma conflicts of interest in research and medical practice and begin to listen to patients. Instead, the AMS report goes on to call for “improvements” to the PIL and “a bigger role” for UK’s National Health Service to be a “source of trusted information online”. The report calls for the European Commission and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to work with pharmaceutical companies to “reform” PIL’s.
Currently the EMA has two open complaints against it by the Nordic Cochrane Centre over maladministration, conflict of interest, secrecy and unprofessionalism concerning the handling of HPV vaccine safety data, research and whistleblowers. What kind of improvements in the PIL are being suggested? The AMS is calling for a more “balanced view” because there is too much focus on the potential side effects of drugs and vaccines on the PIL’s and not enough on their benefits. The rationale for reworking the PIL is not rooted in reality. The broken peer-reviewed process and pharmaceutical industry influence on medical research has continually omitted both greater incidences and number side effects along with exaggeration of benefits.

The Toxicity of Aluminum Adjuvants There are NO clinically approved vaccine aluminium adjuvants
Professor Christopher Exley, world’s leading expert on aluminium.
“There are NO clinically approved vaccine aluminium adjuvants !!!”
The Toxicity of Aluminum Adjuvants

Documentary – The Age of Aluminium (Die Akte Aluminium)
The Age of Aluminium: Die Akte Aluminium. A film and documentary created by Bert Ehgartner (Full English version).

Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us
Dec 1, 2016
The research is hard to ignore, vaccines can trigger autoimmunity with a laundry list of diseases to follow. With harmful and toxic metals as some vaccine ingredients, who is susceptible and which individuals are more at risk?
No one would accuse Yehuda Shoenfeld of being a quack. The Israeli clinician has spent more than three decades studying the human immune system and is at the pinnacle of his profession. You might say he is more foundation than fringe in his specialty; he wrote the textbooks. The Mosaic of Autoimmunity, Autoantibodies, Diagnostic Criteria in Autoimmune Diseases, Infection and Autoimmunity, Cancer and Autoimmunity – the list is 25 titles long and some of them are cornerstones of clinical practice. Hardly surprising that Shoenfeld has been called the “Godfather of Autoimmunology” – the study of the immune system turned on itself in a wide array of diseases from type 1 diabetes to ulcerative colitis and multiple sclerosis.
But something strange is happening in the world of immunology lately and a small evidence of it is that the Godfather of Autoimmunology is pointing to vaccines – specifically, some of their ingredients including the toxic metal aluminum – as a significant contributor to the growing global epidemic of autoimmune diseases. The bigger evidence is a huge body of research that’s poured in in the past 15 years, and particularly in the past five years. Take for example, a recent article published in the journal Pharmacological Research in which Shoenfeld and colleagues issue unprecedented guidelines naming four categories of people who are most at risk for vaccine-induced autoimmunity.
“On one hand,” vaccines prevent infections which can trigger autoimmunity, say the paper’s authors, Alessandra Soriano, of the Department of Clinical Medicine and Rheumatology at the Campus Bio-Medico University in Rome, Gideon Nesher, of the Hebrew University Medical School in Jerusalem and Shoenfeld, founder and head of the Zabludowicz Center of Autoimmune Diseases in the Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer. He is also editor of three medical journals and author of more than 1,500 research papers across the spectrum of medical journalism and founder of the International Congress on Autoimmunology. “On the other hand, many reports that describe post-vaccination autoimmunity strongly suggest that vaccines can indeed trigger autoimmunity. Defined autoimmune diseases that may occur following vaccinations include arthritis, lupus (systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE) diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, dermatomyosiositis, Guillain-Barre syndrome and demyelinating disorders. Almost all types of vaccines have been reported to be associated with the onset of ASIA.”
ASIA – or Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (also known as Shoenfeld’s syndrome) — first appeared in the Journal of Autoimmunology four years ago. It is an umbrella term for a collection of similar symptoms, including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, that result after
exposure to an adjuvant – an environmental agent including common vaccine ingredients that stimulate the immune system. Since then an enormous body of research, using ASIA as a paradigm, has begun to unravel the mystery of how environmental toxins, particularly the metal aluminum used in vaccines, can trigger an immune system chain reaction in susceptible individuals and may lead to overt autoimmune disease.

Study – ‘ASIA’ – autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
Abstract
The role of various environmental factors in the pathogenesis of immune mediated diseases is well established. Of which, factors entailing an immune adjuvant activity such as infectious agents, silicone, aluminium salts and others were associated with defined and non-defined immune mediated diseases both in animal models and in humans. In recent years, four conditions: siliconosis, the Gulf war syndrome (GWS), the macrophagic myofasciitis syndrome (MMF) and post-vaccination phenomena were linked with previous exposure to an adjuvant. Furthermore, these four diseases share a similar complex of signs and symptoms which further support a common denominator.Thus, we review herein the current data regarding the role of adjuvants in the pathogenesis of immune mediated diseases as well as the amassed data regarding each of these four conditions. Relating to the current knowledge we would like to suggest to include these comparable conditions under a common syndrome entitled ASIA, “Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants”.

200 Evidence-Based Reasons NOT To Vaccinate – FREE Research PDF Download!
Posted on: Sunday, February 22nd 2015 at 1:45 pm
Written By: GreenMedInfo Research Group
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2017
The media, your pediatrician, politicians and health authorities like the CDC and FDA claim that vaccines are safe and effective. So why do hundreds of peer-reviewed studies indicate the opposite is true? Read, download, and share this document widely to provide the necessary evidence-based counterbalance to the pro-vaccination propaganda that has globally infected popular consciousness and discussion like an intractable disease.
It is abundantly clear that if the present-day vaccine climate, namely, that everyone must comply with the CDC’s one-size-fits-all vaccination schedule or be labeled a health risk to society at large, is to succumb to open and balanced discussion, it is the peer-reviewed biomedical evidence itself that is going to pave the way towards making rational debate on the subject happen.
With this aim in mind, GreenMedInfo.com has painstakingly collected over 300 pages of study abstracts culled directly from the National Library of Medicine’s pubmed.gov bibliographic database on the wide-ranging adverse health effects linked to vaccines in the today’s schedule (over 200 distinct adverse effects, including death), as well as numerous studies related to vaccine contamination, and vaccine failure in highly vaccine compliant populations.
This is the literature that the media, politicians and governmental health organizations like the CDC, pretend with abject dishonesty does not exist – as if vaccine injury did not happen, despite the over 3 billion dollars our government has paid out to vaccine injured through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund since it was inaugurated in 1986.
We have written extensively about this research previously, highlighting different studies, focusing on translating their implications to the lay persons (view our vaccine article section here), but we believe that collecting and condensing solely the primary literature itself makes a much more powerful statement.
This document is being made free to download to the world at large in order to encourage the lay public, health professionals, activists, and elected officials alike to read, acknowledge and share the voluminous literature with their family, friends, colleagues and related stakeholders. You will find this research undermines the national and global agenda to continue to expand the vaccine schedule (on behalf of a vaccine industry that is indemnified against lawsuit for defective or harmful products), with increasing legislative pressure to remove exemptions and mandate them against the evidence of harm and at best equivocal effectiveness as a preventive health measure.
If the vaccination arm of modern medicine today is to continue to promote itself as a science- and evidence-based practice, it must acknowledge and incorporate the implications of the research we are releasing here, or lose any pretense at credibility. Failing to do so will reveal that the widespread push to remove your choice in the matter is agenda and not evidence driven, and due to the fact that vaccines all carry the risk of irreversible harm and even death (any vaccine insert proves this), it clearly violates the Nuremberg code of medical ethics to promote them as a priori safe and effectiveness. http://www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/vaccination-allhttp://cdn.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/gmipub_58635_anti_therapeutic_action_vaccination_all.pdf

Vaccine Mechanisms in Autism
Disclaimer: The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this Website. All research is referenced at the end of this article.
This article will explain how specific vaccine adjuvants, in combination with the herbicide glyphosate, keep the brain in a permanent inflammatory state leading to the symptoms as seen in autism. It will point out key adjuvants believed to be involved with the development of autism. Lastly, it will briefly touch upon the key part in the brain involved and touches upon novel therapeutic possibilities.

Most middle school students are familiar with the design of a cause and effect study. The pharmaceutical companies are getting around ethically and fairly designed studies by claiming that it would be unethical to withhold a lifesaving medical intervention such as vaccines. This despite the fact that short term studies never included a ‘true’ placebo and vaccinated children have never been compared to non-vaccinated children in long term studies.

As you now are familiar with faulty research designs falsely concluding vaccines are safe for your children and protect your children from illness you may want to question the entire notion of vaccination. Many parents to vaccinated and non-vaccinated children will attest to the fact that the non-vaccinated child claims superior health to the vaccinated child. If large and correctly designed studies were conducted it is likely that pediatricians, health officials, government and pharmaceutical companies would derive at the same conclusion. This of course would expose them and therefore those choosing to vaccinate their children will have to continue to rely on studies proving a pre-determined outcome.