When it comes to physical training, there could be too much of a good thing

UAB researchers publish study that says exercise in moderation yields the best results.

There may be no need to envy the people in the gym working out nearly every day. According to a University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) study, training fewer days may yield similar results.

Gary Hunter, Ph.D., and Gordon Fisher, Ph.D., of the UAB Department of Human Studies, were among a group of scientists who gathered 72 sedentary women, ages 60 to 74, and observed how they were affected by various frequencies of aerobic and resistance training. Older women were selected because they have more of a history of overtraining than younger women, and the researchers wanted to examine that.

The women were divided into groups of those who worked out two-, four- and six-times a week. For 16 weeks, they were monitored while they participated in 40-minute increments of training.

In the end, the women who worked out twice a week were just as aerobically fit and strong as the women who exercised six times a week, said Hunter, a professor in the School of Education. All but the six-times-a-week group burned post-workout calories.

The women who worked out four times a week burned nearly 225 additional calories each day outside of the gym, according to the study. The women who trained twice a week burned nearly 100 more calories in their non-workout mode. The six-times-a-week group, however, burned no significant amount of additional calories when they were not exercising.

“Being physically active is important. Training two- to three-times a week might be enough. If we can find ways to increase our activities rather than training, it is very good.”

Those who followed a less-rigorous exercise regimen were energized and strengthened to do more non-workout activities throughout the week, Hunter said. The women who followed the six-day schedule said they were tired and pressed for time, and they were therefore less active outside of the gym.