On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 04:22:24PM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>
> I'll now work on NAT-T for FAST_IPSEC. Why do we have two IPsec
> implementations, BTW?
Because FAST_IPSEC, while vastly better in other respects, doesn't
do IPv6. If that were fixed, we could junk the old IPsec code.
--
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
"The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is to be
abandoned or transcended, there is no problem." - Noam Chomsky