Official MLBlog of Keith Olbermann

2011 Previews: AL Central

With the fans of the 0-2 Red Sox and 2-0 Yankees having all taken the wrong instructions from these starts, let’s move into the Central:

Chicago: There are a lot of good players on this team. In fact, in a remarkable evenness ranging all the way from the bullpen to the outfield, the average White Sox player is above-average or better. Just – with the exception of Adam Dunn and Paul Konerko – not very much better. There are two men, coincidentally the team’s doubleplay combination of Gordon Beckham and Alexei Ramirez, who are on the verge of stardom. If they achieve it, if they take the cliched next step, the White Sox can compete in the division. If not, this is a team that is indeed just above-average, and bound for nothing better than second place.

Cleveland: Three unheralded stars (Carlos Santana, Shin-Soo Choo, Chris Perez), the very good Asdrubal Cabrera, and filler. Quite awhile ago the Indians stopped taking competing seriously. The ’90s saw the Kenny Loftons et al locked up early and often (in the model since successfully copied in Tampa), but the ’00s saw ownership refuse to spend the money early enough to keep the Cliff Lees and CC Sabathias, and to have clearly also not spent it on careful study of the prospect yields when that talent had to be moved (quick: who besides Matt LaPorta did they get for Sabathia? Who did they get for Lee? And it’s not enough to say, ‘yeah but they got Santana, Choo, and Perez for almost nothing’ – Lee and Sabathia should have produced at least two blossoming stars each). And this decade seems to be the time of refusing to promote prospects when the season was still fresh and up for grabs. Even when placeholder Jason Donald went down with injury, the Tribe refused to promote third base stud Lonnie Chisenhall. And an approach like that gets you not just mediocrity now, but mediocrity later – when Chisenhall leaves anyway, by trade or free agency.

The answers, by the way? Sabathia produced LaPorta, Matt Jackson, Rob Bryson, and Michael Brantley. For Lee it was Donald, Carlos Carrasco, Jason Knapp, and Lou Marson. Not acceptable.

Detroit: The Tigers should have as much pitching as they have confidence. Brad Penny is the Number Two Starter? Brad Penny, who had a 5.61 ERA in his 24 starts in the AL in 2009? One also has to doubt Phil Coke’s ability to return to starting (the Yankees traded him because lefty hitters – especially those who saw him more than once – seemed to solve him), and there is the continuing non-afterglow of Rick Porcello. Justin Verlander and Max Scherzer are studs, but Penny’s placement at #2 implies some lack of confidence in Scherzer, who might still be one of baseball’s best starters. There is also a certain creakiness here: Carlos Guillen is hurt, Magglio Ordonez is a question mark, and the major investment in the off-season was in a catcher who cannot catch: Victor Martinez. I am not excited by the Tigers and in the first two games in New York there was a certain sloppiness to their play in the field – particularly by shortstop Jhonny Peralta and sub second baseman Will Rhymes – that must have Jim Leyland ready to break up the furniture.

Kansas City: If lightning were to strike and present the Royals with some kind of Cup-A-Soup Five-Pack of instant starters, they might actually be competitive. There is a decent infield with improvements coming up at the corners by mid-season, and the all ex-prospect outfield of Alex Gordon, Melky Cabrera, and Jeff Francoeur. But there are no Cup-A-Soup Five-Packs of instant starters (even if Aaron Crow and Mike Montgomery were to step into the rotation tomorrow).

Minnesota: The Twins’ main competition in this division is their own health. If Justin Morneau and Joe Nathan do not fully relapse (and a Nathan partial relapse would be neatly covered by Matt Capps) and no other star comes acropper, I don’t see Minnesota being severely tested. The infield is stronger with Danny Valencia at third and the guy I’d bet on as of tonight for ROTY (Tsuyoshi Nishioka) at second, and the rotation deep enough to move the aptly named Kevin Slowey to the bullpen. There is much more of a gap between the Twins and the rest of the division than conventional wisdom suggests.

OVERVIEW: 1. Minnesota (in a comparative romp); I’ll go for the Beckham-Ramirez growth spurt to make it 2. Chicago and 3. Detroit. The Royals will put up a valiant fight, but it’s got to be 4. Cleveland and 5. Kansas City.

11 Comments

oh and two twins. No hitting twins. Balk error and beam in one inning twins. Gave up 15 runs in two games. One hitter had two homers and a triple. We still have no teeth I fear. Toronto is no slouch but liriano and pavano didn’t make it to the 5th inning #WorriedTwinsFan

As a Twins fan, I hope you’re right. However, they don’t have starters that can go beyond five innings. Look at their first two games. Their hitting is too streaky. They lost all their best middle relief pitchers to free agency: Guerrier, Crain, and Rauch. They don’t have enough good pitching to get to their closers. I see second place behind the hated White Sox. As a long-time suffering Tribe fan, I say your analysis of their boneheaded mangement is spot on.

What happened the first two games in Toronto tells us nothing about the Twins. But their 2010 playoff performance does.

The 2007 brought back a reigning MVP in Morneau and batting champ in Mauer, in addition to Torii Hunter and Johan Santana. But they couldn’t get past contract distractions and the lingering effects of a crushing 2006 sweep at the hands of the Oakland A’s. (Oakland A’s!)

2011 will turn out the same as 2007. Deep in their subconscious, the Twins know there’s no point to winning the division because they get burned in the postseason every year.

FWIW, I don’t think the Tigers see Penny as the #2, even though they pitched him in game 2 against the Yankees. I believe they lined up their rotation so Scherzer could get the start at their home opener. I sure hope they show better than they have in games 1 & 2, otherwise we Detroit faithful are in for a long year.

Keith, I think you underestimate the White Sox rotation vs. the Twins’ and Tigers’ offerings. Combine that with a solid 1-7, good enough fielding (Ramirez was cheated out of a gold glove last year, the rest of the lineup is average) and I think the Sox come out with 93 wins this year.

That said, Ron Gardenhire could put a bunch of 12-year-olds on the field and manage them to a 90-win season. I think they’re you’re wild card squad

Tigers have young stud pitchers ready to “step up”
if anyone in the rotation falters: Jacob Turner, Furbush, Oliver.

Carlos Guillen and Zumaya should be released.
Magglio should be part time DH and pinch hitter off the bench.
The key to the Tigers this year is can Leyland and GM Dave Dombrowski let go of washed up veterans and let their promising young OFs and position players play??!!

Worth won the SS job in Spring training by performance and was sent to AAA in favor of Peralta.
Wells, Boesch, Raburn, Jackson and Dirks should be
rotating in the OF and not Magglio.

Sizemore and Rhymes should be sharing 2B duties.

Tigers had one of the best records in MLB playing their
young players. As in the last few years, as soon as they
insert some of their high priced declining veterans,
the team does not perform as well.

Thank you for picking the Twins to take the AL Central. If I’m not mistaken you picked the Tigers and they ended up third. I’m hoping for the same result this year with your pick. With the Tigers at the top this year. (crossing fingers)

Meta

The following are trademarks or service marks of Major League Baseball entities and may be used only with permission of Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. or the relevant Major League Baseball entity: Major League, Major League Baseball, MLB, the silhouetted batter logo, World Series, National League, American League, Division Series, League Championship Series, All-Star Game, and the names, nicknames, logos, uniform designs, color combinations, and slogans designating the Major League Baseball clubs and entities, and their respective mascots, events and exhibitions.