When Sharon Bialek said that he was with Herman Cain at the Chicago TEA Party event with Herman Cain I reached out to one of the key voices and leaders of the Chicago TEA Party C. Steven Tucker and he says I did not recognize her Chuck and I was there all weekend.

I have been reaching out to my other friends in the Chicago TEA Party and so far no one recognizes her. Gloria Allred portrayed Bialek as a TEA Party Republican. Having seen her picture Bialek is not someone who goes unnoticed easily.

Tucker comments further:

I have spoken at Tea Party events ALL OVER Chicagoland including TeaCon Midwest 2011 where Gloria Allred says her client confronted Herman Cain. I have never seen nor have I ever even heard of a Sharon Bialek.

Bailek has not been seen at any other TEA Party events. Even if she had gone to just one, why go to the one with Herman Cain and no others? It makes no sense.

Sharon Blailek said that this happened in 1996 so where was Blailek when Herman Cain was running for Senate in 2004?

We have been doing internet searches on Sharon Bialek. Her linkedin and all social networking/employer networking sites where her name appears seem to have been scrubbed. When you are telling the truth, why make the attempt to scrub your past?

Speaking of not making sense, why would a supposed Republican TEA Party activist/sympathizer call a known leftist hatchet man like Gloria Allred, as any association with Allred would impune her credibility?

I have no idea whether the woman’s story is true or not and whether she was put up to it or not.

But it makes sense to me that, as she described, she and her boyfriend had quasi-partied with Herman while she still had her job. So after she lost her position, she checked in with him to see if he could find her one elsewhere in the association (or at a state association).

If these charges are false, Cain has to take this woman on and sue her. If the democrats will falsely accuse in this manner and get away with this behaviour without being challenged then the gates are openned on all and any republican, candidate that comes along. Cain has to do more than just deny. His campaign has to sue her and get evidence that she is working for someone in order to ruin his run for Presidency.

Maybe she attended solely as a way to meet up with Cain — which, surprisingly, she succeeded at — as a way to try to leverage her old connection for career help, to get “famous” by being connected with the famous, to shake him down — many things possible here.

He didn’t “take her in,” so to speak.

Within a few weeks/months, she’s trashing him in the media — with a story that, by her own admission, she did not even tell her boyfriend or anyone else the details of at the time, lo more than a decade ago.

Maybe she even got in for free, seeing as she’s connected with the media (radio).

54
posted on 11/07/2011 2:30:04 PM PST
by fightinJAG
(NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)

I am a woman, just older that Ms Bialek. In the mid 90’s IF I had called up one of my old employers while I was visiting from out of town and agreed to meet up with him in my hotel room, I would have been the sexual agressor.

This type of thing wasn’t done in my day, at least without the expectation of a sexual tryst.

Okay, it’s a moral issue. Once again, there’s NO PROOF. Perhaps you’re ready to take a CBS media employee from CHICAGO at her word, who has never brought this issue forth in the 15 years since she says it happened, but I’m not. Cain has repeatedly said these are lies. Why do you assume he’s the liar here? Additionally, her description of the events is very disturbing. Do you honestly think if this happened the way she says it happened, she would have told only 3 people that he harassed her and not speak of the sordid details?

I advocated taking all info available into account and then trusting your gut.

I also advocated that people stop applying “innocent until proven guilty” inappropriately. When folks misapply this standard, it demonstrates a major lack of understanding of the fundamentals of our moral AND legal system.

Tea Party event was in October 2011; very recent. I can almost guarantee that she was already working with Allred or some other polical operatives at the time. That event was a planned event/set up to lend credence to her story.

Breitbart’s Big Government site is reporting a source that confirms Ms. Bialek’s attendance at the Schaumberg, IL TEACON 2011 event on 9/30-10/1, 2011. Breitbart was a featured speaker but the event materials on the web do not advertise Cain as a speaker.

Again, this is easlily a set-up by Ms. Bialek’s handlers who were already planning today’s media event.

Oh.. I’m also chatting on IM with a friend who was there and near Cain all the time because he was reporting on the campaign and he doesn’t remember her. He said he is going to pull all his photos and post them online to see if anyone sees her.

Well, as the old saying goes, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” We’ll find out soon enough if this babe is a fraud or not. I never thought Joe Pa’s defensive coordinator could be charged with sodomizing boys, but oh well. Whatever happened/didn’t happen, happened or didn’t happen. We’ll have more evidence—maybe even proof—soon enough. I for one am tired of going out on a limb and pronouncing HOW IT’S ALL JUST GOTTA BE before I get a clear picture of the facts and what those facts mean.

85
posted on 11/07/2011 3:39:20 PM PST
by ishmac
(Lady Thatcher:"There are no permanent defeats in politics because there are no permanent victories.)

Perhaps you could point me to the list of appropriate ‘innocent until proven guilty’ applications so in the future, I won't demonstrate such a major lack of understanding of the ‘fundamentals’ of our moral AND legal system. Not that you care because you obviously have a far superior grasp on the subject than I, but according to her presser today, what she alleges Cain did is ASSAULT and believe it or not, that is a LEGAL issue. Honestly, are you always so condescending?

" Oh.. Im also chatting on IM with a friend who was there and near Cain all the time because he was reporting on the campaign and he doesnt remember her. He said he is going to pull all his photos and post them online to see if anyone sees her. "

Would you know it ? NBC has this with it's top stories tonight.

Was there any video taping of the event ? security cams ? it could prove that Cain is innocent of her accusations...

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.