Entries in Liberal Pathology
(22)

This is even more so appropriate today than when I originally posted it back in February of 2008.

There is an oddity that drives the Liberal Proponents of Guilt and Shame to frenzied hate and pitiful rhetoric filled with platitudes, bumper sticker sloganeering and utter contempt for those which do not comply or adhere to the Liberal Pathology.

It is painfully obvious to the vast majority that the over emotional weaklings cannot be trusted to be alone with themselves let alone be in positions of responsibility.

Some time ago, Family Security Matters conducted a study that revealed many issues of the liberal mindset and explained in detail that which most of already knew but did not understand The Why. This group brings to discussion topics such as Liberal pathology, Liberals are like children, A rage that knows no bounds, Fathoming liberal rage, Rage trumps rationality, Symptoms of liberal pathology, Diagnosing liberal pathology, Symptoms of liberal pathology and Diagnosing liberal pathology.

Rick Moran has attempted to clarify the Liberal Mindset of BDS but to this writer, it falls short of the mindset. The mental disorder that is all so prevalent in the psychological make up of the modern day Liberal has been further diagnosed and made public by Charles Krauthammer. Among other things: From 1975-1978, Krauthammer was a Resident and then a Chief Resident in Psychiatry at the Massachusetts General Hospital. During this time he and a colleague identified a form of mania (a part of bipolar disorder) which they named "secondary mania" and published a second important paper. The standard textbook for bipolar disease ("Manic Depressive Illness" by Goodwin and Jamison) contains nine citations of his work.

Many studies have been made delving into the liberal mind (and it has just got to be spooky in there) but studying a void of understanding would seem to be an odd endeavor to say the least. I have a collection of posts and articles on the Liberal Pathology and once in a while I like to revisit them. For instance, JWF has a post from 11/30/08 entitled, "LA Times Pinhead: Joe McCarthy Is the Father of Conservatism". Some libtard buffoon will actually believe that idiocy but, then again, we are talking about the Liberal Mind and we all know that it is a mental disorder. But wait. The dunce that stated that IS a mental midget libtard. I say that because the fool supported the illegal alien, fraud and crook Obama.

The other problem with the article JWF writes about is that Obamatards are giving advice to the GOP on how to "fix the problem". So, this leads to a much larger problem. There will be idiot GOPers that will actually say something to the affect, "WOW! He's right!" We call them RINOs, democrat infiltrators that are actually democrats at heart and are in the wrong Party or they are in the Republican Party to destroy it from within. They are doing a grand job of it b y the way...that weasel Lindsey Graham being one of them.

Donald Douglas agrees with my sentiments for dealing with the Enemies Within and we certainly do have Enemies Within. When one's personal and political beliefs, tenets, wishes and desires are 180-degrees out of phase with the United States Constitution, that defines our enemies, whether they are within or without. Yet, these same imbeciles that promote the dismemberment of our Constitution have the nerve and gall to classify us as "traitors" or folks out of touch. I run across these types on college campuses all of the time and quite a few of them are part of Academia. I have fun tearing their backsides off with facts instead of emotionally tainted drivel.

The Liberal Pathology doesn't allow their infection of mental madness to grasp the inherent values of True American Patriotism. It doesn't fit into their emotionally charged blindness of logic and reason. Warner Todd Huston posts at the blog STACLU the following: "Liberals Don’t Know What Patriotism Means". This is obviously true. However, don't let them in on the Big Secret. They will not be able to comprehend the following:

Some think it a canard that liberals aren’t patriotic. In some ways, it is a canard, but only just. Some liberals really do imagine themselves patriotic. But in what ever way liberals imagine they feel for their country, it doesn’t seem that patriotism is really what they feel. At least not in the way that patriotism is properly defined. There has been a spate of stories in the media since Obama’s election that serve to illustrate why liberals seem incapable of being patriotic.But, first, what is patriotism?After the War of 1812 one of our most celebrated sea captains, Stephen Decatur (America’s first post Revolutionary War military hero) once gave a toast at Norfolk to his fellow seamen that is the most perfect illustration of true patriotism. As he lifted his glass, Decatur said,

“Our country! In her intercourse with foreign nations, may she always be in the right; but our country, right or wrong.”

“May she always be in the right; but our country, right or wrong.”

This reflects real patriotism. It isn’t my country IF I agree with everything she does. It isn’t my country IF I like the president or party in power. It isn’t my country IF I feel comfortable, am rich, or have personal power. There is an intrinsic value imparted to the nation whether it currently seems to be upholding what makes it worthy or not. It is my country whether I currently am comfortable with its policies and politicians or not.For some nations, patriotism is defined because of its homogeneous racial or religious makeup. Sometimes it is a mere aspect of geography and longevity as a nation. The French love France because they are French. The English love England because it has a proud, defiant history of standing as one against all comers, etc., etc. As a matter of course, most peoples imagine that their patriotism is based on an assumption that their country has intrinsic value.But the United States is a bit different in what its patriotism is based upon. It isn’t geography, a single religion, or mere history that Americans base their patriotism upon. The United States is one of the few nations that were created by design and not simply by time, religion, war or geography. The reason Americans feel patriotic for the USA is because of a belief in her national precepts: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, religious freedom, freedom of speech, the national republican system, and a reliance on capitalist self-determination. [Read the rest]

True American Patriotism cannot dwell in the Liberal Mind, the Liberal Heart or the Liberal Soul. It does not compute. American Liberalism has morphed into all left-leaning forms of government dogma and the only thing that matters is The State and the people are a convenient nuisance and at times an inconvenient nuisance. True American Patriotism grants governance by consent and allows government to exist to provide law and order at the behest of the people. That is why American Liberalism opposes the US Constitution in actions and deeds but they decry that they are the Constitution Watch Dogs. And fools fall for it because they are without wit and are void of understanding.

The modern day liberal, whether they are a D,R or I, think the American People are too free. Simply amazing. If your basic liberal did actually know their Constitution or actually gave a damn about it, they wouldn't be saying that Obama should start his presidency now. Unless there is a Constitutional amendment to change the current "changing of the guard", their idiocy reeks of blatant stupidity.

Your basic theoretically educated moonbat brings up ignorant and baseless law suits with charges of whatever they feel like because that is the way they feel. Facts cause them to fade away or screech like the wicked witch of the west. Or, they run off the edges of cliffs as the possessed swine did as the story goes. These same types of moonbats declare an "official Obama day" before the fraud that has accomplished absolutely nothing but swindle the dumb has even stepped into the White House as the New Emperor. In another example of the Liberal Pathology, they take great pride in classifying their opposition as racists when they themselves conduct themselves in the same manner. Before Blago got caught with his hand in the cookie jar, there were politicians demanding that Barack's replacement be a black man. I suppose whether or not the replacement was qualified for the job has no bearing. Can you imagine if a conservative had stated that a white guy moving up had to be replaced with a white guy? The sky would be falling and calls for heads to roll would be all over the place. Democrat politicians don't qualify for any recognition of anything beneficial to anyone...Leahy primarily.

And, about those Obama supporters I mentioned earlier. How dumb were they actually? As it turns out, pretty dumb would be "Rather" vague. The Matrix says "dumb" wouldn't be very nice so he classifies them as "uninformed". That's OK Matrix. We will call them what they are. We aren't afraid of telling it like it is. They are worse than dumb. They are retarded for the most part and have been "trained" that way thanks to the Academia indoctrination forces, the lame stream media and the Marxist swine in DC and across the country. They are incapable of finding out facts on their own and have been taught to trust others "smarter than they". Their shallow personalities and lust for the unreal is depicted in the picture to the left..HT RWN.

Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah Palin, the Conservative Libertarian, thank you very much. And, she was the ONLY conservative on the ticket. All of you idiots and emotional "fair weather conservatives" that made it possible for an Obama victory really should have all of your heads examined...there is an infection in one of them.

So far, the biased media hasn't forcefully reported on the campaign lies of the One. He hasn't delivered on any of them yet and the "peace thugs" are none too pleased about it. Idiots. No one listens to them seriously. Not in these days. They voted for him because he was going to "end this war". They got suckered in. Now he is playing a different tune. All he cared about was Power. Campaign promises? Oh. Those are just words and speeches, don't ya know? They only apply to "other" folks and most certainly not to a Democrat.

This is the last comment to be dissected for the originating post here. Part 6 of this series will be created by comments placed in Parts 1 and following of this series called Reeducating The Yutes.

Comment #6 from Liberal A: this is a doozy

the united states is not a Democracy???? Are you insane?? do you read anything other than your own whack job authorities. the whole world considers the US a democracy. You and your ilk are terrifying to the future of any rational society. where are your answers to the questions I have posed to you. where is the debate. it is you who are not capable of debate because you have no facts to back up your nonsensical assertions.

how is it unconstitutional to provide health care to all of our citizens? we have done this for senior citizens for decades. it has never been found to be unconstitutional. please explain how it is unconstitutional. you made an assertion. you should be able to explain what makes it unconstitutional

Judas H Priest. What a ninny. IT demands answers to ITS questions yet offers none of ITS own. Poor thing. Must be tough living in that moonbat spider hole. Let's see if I can "answer these ad homs".

No, I am not insane unless I think fixing a moonbat's idiocy, self-induced, is actually possible. And, no, the USA is not a Democracy or at least it wasn't founded as one. It may be one now seeing that every moron in and out of government thinks that mob rule is the law of the land. Mob rule is not the law of the land...yet but it is getting close. Just look how those morons in CA and across the country are reacting to the Prop 8 vote in CA. Those Anarchists seem to think that if they burn enough churches down and if they send white powder to enough people, the majority will yield to the minority. That is what democracy is...mob rule.

I have presented many facts and substantiation to my every point and assertion and this moonbat has brought none...IT came unprepared to be spanked and had by the Mad Hadder, me. And now, IT is upset so IT accuses me of doing what IT is doing...making lame assertions with zero facts and examples.

It is unconstitutional for the Federal Government to provide Health Care, Unemployment, Food Stamps, Welfare and any other socialist give-away program that cannot be reconciled with the United States Constitution. As soon as someone in and of authority that can provide Constitutional Chapter and Verse for every single Federal Government agency, policy and program, I will accept them if they are indeed Constitutional. Seeing that the Federal Government never has and seeing that absolutely no politician has done so, I can only conclude that there isn't Constitutional standing for any of them. I am talking about on the Federal level and not on the State level...there is a difference. We fought a Civil War over States Rights that some think was over slavery...which it wasn't.

And, I don't give a DAMN if "we have been doing it for a long time", no matter what that particular "it" is. Some politicians have tried to have our CONgress substantiate everything with the US Consttution and they will not even bring that out of committee. I wonder why that is.

It was a simple post actually and an obvious one at that. It started with a simple question and the poor thing had a conniption fit over the Republic v Democracy thing. It obviously wants a Democracy and I am sure any Democracy would make this idiot happier than returning to our Federal Republic as outlined in our Constitution.

UHOH! More talking dulls from a deluded and poisoned mind. It actually DOES believe this crap!

Comment #5 From Libtard IDIOT A: ROFLMAO! I really don't know where to begin with this complete and utter fool.

you said you wanted to debate. you haven't answered any of my questions:

Federal Republic IS a form of democracy. we consider ourselves a democracy.here is a map of modern democricies. They are even called "Liberal Democracies:

case closed. please answer my questions about the gutting of all of our regulatory agencies.

here's another question: apparently, you think government doesn't work. that't true when it's run by incompetents and criminals like the ones in the Bush administration. Bush privitized Walter Reed Hospital. Greed took over and veterans received no care.It is back to government control now.when Obama gets in, veterans will get the care they deserve. Bush pushed student loans into private credit providers. Those providers are gutting students with usorous interest rates and unfair practices. here is an article in today's paper.

of course the republican congress gutted all the regulations on credit card companies and they are now charging up to 39% interest. I suppose you support that too.

So since you are against government, Mr Historian, why don't you name one country in the whole history of the world that has had NO government. Do you suggest a country of 390 million people have no rules and regulations, no one to fix the roads, protect the consumer, provide a safety net for the poor and sick. what are governments for, just for killing and the military, kind of like the Libertarian idea??? Tell me Mr Historian. Elaborate on those phoney nonsensical soundbites of yours!

Please tell me how providing health care to all of our citizens would be unconstitutional. Explain how it would be unconstitutional. I will be happy to debate.

I am sorry I called you names. I am not proud of that, but I would like your detailed answers since you have written a long opinion piece.

Respectfully,

Barbara

Holy Toledo ladies and gentlemen! I mean, DAMN! This was sure has the SALAD thing down doesn't it?

The very first sentence in this idiot's comment is one of those jumping to conclusions things. I wonder where I stated that I "wanted to" debate? I don't debate idiots. I squash them. Period. There is no debating a fool and this particular fool is the very epitome of a spoiled brat, breaking out in temper tantrums. It really is amazing.

In parts 2 and 3 of this series, the comments therein bear the assertion of the emotional idiocy so common among the basic childish libtard that has absolutely no idea what they think they are talking about. It is incredible. Comments for

Part 2 is located here and Part 1 comments is located here. I am quite sure that this series will go for quite some time due to the comments that are in Parts 1 and 2...I haven't even gotten to them yet but if one of the contributors of this blog wants to make a post on them, go ahead and do so.

Whenever they mention ANYTHING with wikipedia in it you know you have a total buffoon on your hands. Checkmate at this point and anything they say afterwards can be discounted as irrelevant. To make matters worse for itself, after IT cited wiki, he cited the Washington Compost. I am surprised that IT didn't cite the National Enquirer as well. Hell, in other comments IT cited the Rolling Stone for Christ's sake. DAMN!

These idiots shouldn't be allowed to vote. Now do you all understand why our Founding Fathers allowed for only the informed people vote? This one is sorely ill informed. Michael Sall has something to say about that as well.

Once again and as usual, IT makes a claim with absolutely no examples and no proof. IT makes the claim and I guess expects or "demands" that I answer ITS questions. That doesn't fly here in this blog. So, when the moron says that Bush is a war criminal and incompetent without the examples or proof or substantiation, I'll not do ITS homework for IT. I know EXACTLY what IT is going to say if IT has the guts to place the examples in the comments but I doubt IT will. The poor thing has already been spanked hard and has been had by the Mad Hadder...me.

When did President Bush "privatize" Walter Reed? I must have missed that memo. Chapter and verse please. Another incredible and outrageously retarded statement by this moron is that I don't want a government. I nearly lost an entire mouthful of coffee on that one.

Someone help me out here and let me know EXACTLY when and where that I have ever said that.

The only item that can be truly addressed in this comment is the subject of Federal Government provision of Health Care. National Health Care or Socialized Health Care or any other name the liberals want to give it is unconstitutional because the very premise cannot be reconciled with the United States Constitution. Period. End of discussion. Name the chapter and verse in the United States Constitution where that is addressed and I will buy into it. Now, if each individual State wants to provide that kind of health care to the residents of the individual States and the PEOPLE of those States so choose that for themselves, that is a different story. The Federal Government, by the US Constitution, does not have that authority.

The United States Constitution belongs to We The People and not the Government. Period.

This is getting quite entertaining. What we have here is an official professional libtard idiot troll. Yes sir. A Pro Troll. What with all of the leaping and plunging to a previously perceived conclusion, their emotions take over and infer just about anything imaginable to support their inability to produce any substantiation at all. Simply amazing.

I was going to place three of the comments, #s 4, 5 and 6 here but I have changed my mind. It makes the posts too long. So, I will utilize #4 comment from the original post that started this reeducation process.

Comment #4 from Libtard Troll A:

as those of us who have gone to school know: a federal republic is a form of democracy: Your labels are silly and show an inability to think critically and in-depth. everything isn't just black or white- old snoopy

Encarta AnswersDemocracy:(Greek demos, "the people â€�; kratein, â€œto ruleâ€�), political system in which the people of a country rule through any form of government they choose to establish. In modern democracies, supreme authority is exercised for the most part by representatives elected by popular suffrage.More about Democracy | Source

WOW! Proof positive that this foolish imp has an ego the size of ITS plant between the legs, as it were. Not a SINGLE original thought other than emotionally charged drivel and then a word for word incantation from someone else that did ITS thinking for IT. Very interesting pathology there. Dr Rossiter and Dr Krauthammer would have field days with this one. I am sure Freud would as well.

The poor thing is stuck on whether or not we are a Democracy because IT has never taken the time to actually read our Constitution. If IT had, IT would know that we are not a Democracy but a Federal Republic operating under Democratic Principles.

IT has also revealed several of ITS "other identities" by using specific monikers.

It matters not a wit what people of today call or label the Nation we call the United States. What matters is what is in the US Constitution. It really is that simple and the simpletons should be able to decipher and discern this. Hell, my 13 year old can.

Don't you just love how the libtards say things like, "as those of us who have gone to school know: ", and then quote someone else? ROFLMAO!

The comments which have inspired this series can be located here for the thread referenced in Part 1.

The second and third comments in the post originally written here is what we will deal with in this post. To be clear, please take note that the comments do not address the lies of Obama and his migration from the far-left Marxist ideology to the alleged and feigned centrist ideologies now being put forth by The One Messiah. The Czarbie apologists have begun there realization...Obama lied just like we said he was doing. The one placing the comments has also ignored the birth certificate issue, the democrat fear-mongering quagmire; self induced, the Democrat Party history of slavery, bigotry, the formation of the KKK, voter and campaign fraud and their unconstitutional principles and practices while claiming others have shredded the document. However, that is to be expected because one cannot debate the Leftinistra on Principles and Policies and Issues...they lose every time. They would "Rather" talk about their fantasies and their lies as if they are Truth. With that said, let us begin.

Comment #2 by Liberal A: (notice the unoriginal cut and paste technique...they have no originality to speak of)

Here is a section from Encarta about a great liberal thinker who influenced our founding fathers:

IV John Locke Print this section

An influential early liberal was the English philosopher John Locke. In his political writings, which deeply influenced the framers of the United States Constitution, he argued for popular sovereignty, the right of rebellion against oppression, and toleration of religious minorities. According to the thought of Locke and his many followers, the state exists not to promote people â€™s spiritual salvation, but to serve its citizens and to guarantee their life, liberty, and property under a constitution.

Much of Locke â€™s philosophy is reflected in the writings of the Anglo-American political philosopher and writer Thomas Paine, who argued that the authority of one generation should not be considered binding on its successors, that the state is perhaps necessary but still an evil, and that a belief in divine order was all the religion that need be demanded of free people. Thomas Jefferson also echoed Locke in the Declaration of Independence and in later pronouncements defending revolutions, attacking paternalistic government, and upholding free expression of unpopular opinions.

In France, Locke â€™s philosophy was taken over by the leaders of the French Enlightenment, notably by the author and philosopher Voltaire. He insisted that the state should be supreme over the church and demanded universal religious toleration, abolition of censorship, lenient punishment of criminals, and a strong state acting only under general rules of law against forces obstructive of social progress and individual liberty. For Voltaire as for the French philosopher and dramatist Denis Diderot, the state is a machine for the creation of happiness and a positive instrument designed to check a strong nobility and a strong church, the two forces they considered most uncompromisingly dedicated to the conservation of old institutions.

They make it hard to read sometimes with the cut and paste deals due to the odd-ball symbols. This is usually the sign that they have brought another's verbiage to the Debate Table because they have none of their own that mean anything. Their own verbiage that they write themselves is normally rife with ad homs and emotional drivel and has absolutely no basis in fact except for the usual moniker of "google it". Such shallow and child-like idiocy makes me chuckle and can inspire posts such as this.

Comment #3 by Liberal A:

do you see where liberals influenced the founders of this country and our constitution?????? You are completely ignorant. you like to use stupid labels like all you right wing non-thinkers. Liberalism Marxism. how about fascism and GW Bush. You people have just about destroyed our whole country and still you are spewing your ignorant chatter without any decent policies or concrete suggestions in sight. you are a disgrace to any intelligent society. Go get yourself an education. You hold degrees? Really hard to believe unless it is one of those right wing religious schools that make up their own "facts".

here's an article about some of their thinking.there are other even worse polls of their opinions. maybe most historians are liberals because they have studied history and they see what policies and ideas are for the common good and which are not and which are actually destructive

I am just curious. you appear to be one of the 26% who think Bush has done a hell of a job.. just tell me why you think it is a good thing that he gutted all of our regulatory agencies- including those that protect our food and our environment, not to mention those that used to regulate financial institutions and the trading of commodities. Please tell me how that is a good thing.

then tell me why it is right that this disgraceful human being politicized our whole JUstice department. Is that what freedom and democracy are all about. yes our country is referred to as a democracy. JUst like Bush the idiot says he is spreading democracy all around the world-via war and torture. did you see how those world leaders refused to shake his hand??? I guess degrees are easy to come by these days. Bush has a degree from Yale and the whole world knows he is a know nothing who admitted to having read only one book that wasn't about Baseball or wasn't the Bible-his first debate..

oh well, you will keep spewing your nonsense, I am sure..

Barbara

There is quite a gathering of words forming sentences and all but they don't amount to much of anything substantial but we will try and make some sense of it anyway.

John Locke: yes, he influenced just about everyone he met and those he never met via his writings. I am one of them. However, his "liberalism" is not the same as Americanized Liberalism which amounts modern socialism, Marxism and Communism and in recent years "Progressivism". Equating today's Liberalism with John Locke is not only laughable but absolutely ridiculous. However, referencing the List of 45, one will find that this particular tactic was discussed before this particular "liberal" was born. Behold:

29) Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30) Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man".

31) Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of "the big picture": Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32) Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture - - education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33) Eliminate all laws or procedures, which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34) Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

42) Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special interest groups should rise up and make a "united force" to solve economic, political, or social problems.

All of the above are obviously diametrically opposed to the writings of John Locke which I have studied for decades so when a "liberal" brings up John Locke, you can see why I find that particularly funny and how it reveals their utter ignorance. So, John Locke is not the same as today's liberal at all. Let's move on to the third comment.

Aside from the over use of the ? key, the first sentence can be discounted and summarily dismissed as being totally irrelevant. Historically speaking, the liberal of yore is certainly not the liberal of today and the next part is yet another ad hom showing and revealing the inability to check their emotions due to one's uneducated stupidity trying to sound as if they are educated. I only write such posts to teach others how this is done.

It speaks of the fascism of Bush. I find that comical. Where is the substantiation? Where are the examples? Where is the proof? If they try to bring up FISA, does that make Obama a fascist as well seeing that he voted FOR it right after he said he wasn't going to? Naturally, there are no connections to President Bush and fascism but then again, the liberals have claimed that President Bush was also Hitler and there again, no proof has ever been presented other than emotional ignorance and stupidity which exposes the lack of historical education.

The remaining portions of the first paragraph in the third comment is nothing more than more childish ad homs which amount to more childish and emotionally unhinged stupidity. Simply amazing and this fool wants to debate? Debate what? How emotionally weak it is? No thanks. That requires no debate as it is "Rather" obvious even to the oblivious.

Next, the emotional child presents proof that the COLB (certificate of live birth) of Obama was shown to be fact but failed to recognize how forensic specialists proved the COLB was false and forged and the ones guilty of the forgery admitted to it. It also fails to make the connection that a COLB is not a birth certificate. Case closed.

Next, the uneducated "liberal" cites the Rolling Stone as an authoritative source as a historical source for the "common good" yet exposing that IT has no idea what the Constitution says about the "common good". Incredible. So, how does one debate a fool? The answer is that one does not because one cannot and this particular fool is a fool's fool.

The last two entries in the liberal's comment proves the fool's fool assertion. Apparently, IT believes in opinion polls as gospel which reveals a mental disparity between that which is real and that which is not. IT thinks I am a Bush supporter. I am not and never have been. I voted for him twice because I was certainly not voting for the Global Warming Myth Fraud Gore nor was I going to vote for the War Criminal, self-admitted, John F'n Kerry. Period. The ONLY thing I supported President Bush on was the Global War On Terror because he was rioght on that one and I fought in that war BEFORE he was President and BEFORE he was Governor of Texas. So, its following assertions are null and void and have no bearing, at least as far as I am concerned.

Yet, those assertions IT makes have no factual basis because IT presents no examples whatsoever which is the usual tactic utilized by such an emotionally unbalanced Americanized liberal. IT whines about the Justice System and I can only surmise that IT means the firing of the attorneys which is a President's right to do so and the only idiots that politicized it were the liberals...that discount that President Clinton did worse. Checkmate.

IT whines about Bush spreading democracy by war and torture with no basis in fact and discounts that thew United States has been at war with terrorism since 1974...they declared it via a plethora of Fatwahs and we ignored them until 91101 which was the Final Straw. The fool is a fool's fool. Alas, I digress.

Comments 4, 5 and 6 of the liberal will be addressed in Part 3 of Reeducating the Yutes series. IN comment #6 IT claims that "the whole world thinks we are a democracy" so I guess we need to amend our Constitution accordingly now.

In a previous post entitled, "So What Do We Do About It?" we had the typical reaction from an uneducated "lefty" or a wrongfully educated "victim" of the List of 45. I cannot classify the individual making the comments a troll just yet so I will refrain from the usual "nailing of the troll to the Leftinistra cross" at this time. However, as SOP goes here, there comes a time when comments from the opposition make for good posts. This is such a time.

Click the link above and then read the post. Once that is accomplished, return here and we will discuss the comments left by the "misguided" and "wrongfully educated" student of history.

The post is about the creeping socialism in this nation beginning with President Wilson and made Law by FDR. Since that time, it has been a battle of ideology as this libtard points out. Naturally, the responder to the post in the comments section ignored the Obama birth certificate issue, and his many lies as revealed by his post-election actions and activities. The gist of the post was how the basic and general Marxist/socialist will lie to anyone and everyone to "win" an election. Their followers have not ideologies of their own and merely parrot the ideologies that appeal to their emotion because their intellects are void of substance and their void of understanding is simply AWOL.

First comment from Lib A:

You are one sick uninformed puppy. Liberalism is a mental disorder? It is liberalism that brought us Democracy, the end of child labor and so many other great reforms. It brought us free speech, the right for all citizens to vote. People with grade school educations should not be writing blogs and exposing their ignorance for all to see. I suggest you go to the Encyclopedia Britannica (if you know what that is) and look up Liberalism and conservatism. Liberalism great accomplishments take up dozens of pages and like I said before include the development of democracies. Conservatism fought all of these ideas and it's main accomplishment in America in the 20th Century was McCarthyism.

What you need is an education. Finally our country IS BEING TAKE BACK from the ignorant and uninformed which you so shamefully represent. oh that's right- Republicans have no shame! They say they are Christians as they support war and torture and the gutting of our great Constitution, written by men who were the Progressives of their times

Barbara

WOW! The first statement is the usual personal attack and some would call that some sort of derangement syndrome in some circles. We will call this one the XDS with the "X" undefined at the moment. However, I was then referred to the Encyclopedia, specifically the Britannica and IT wondered if I knew what that was. If the Encyclopedia Britannica is the be-all of end-all, we are all in trouble. Have you ever read the idiocy therein? That publication is at least one step up from Wikipedia and that isn't saying much.

According to the comment, because "liberalism" takes up pages and pages as opposed to "conservatism", conservatism isn't as good as liberalism. Interesting pathology that. I wonder what Drs Rossiter and Krauthammer would say about that? Incredible. I could spend quite a bit of time on that alone. Asamatter

One thing is more or less true in the comment...liberalism does bring about "democracy". There in lies the problem. Democracy is the antithesis of our Constitution. Democracy is mob rule and an example of that would be what is going on in California in regards to Proposition 8. The "losers" in that California Constitutional Amendment voting scenario are demanding that their "loss" be turned over and they are willing to do whatever it takes to get that "election" undone. That is democracy at work...mob rule...the minority in number violently dictating to the majority in number, the peaceful. Yes. liberalism, at least Americanized Liberalism is indeed a mental disorder reminiscent of temper tantrums rendered by spoiled brats when their way is not allowed or realized. This is also alluded to in the List of 45.

The poor misguided student has revealed quite a bit of its misunderstanding of the Founding Fathers and that is also exposed in the List of 45. The creature has no understanding whatsoever about the end of "child labor", "free speech", the right to vote and the catch-all and unsubstantiated "many other great reforms". Generalities are vanity. I deal in specifics. I let the emotional deal in generalities because it soothe their empty souls while I deal with the intellectual aspects of life.

Free Speech was granted us as a gift from our Creator and not "liberalism". Child Labor was abolished due to common sense and has nothing at all to do with "liberalism" unless one plays with the emotion heart string and claims the children were "liberated"...not the same thing unless the emotionally unhinged think otherwise. The "right to vote" is granted by our Constitution and has nothing to do with "liberalism". If you look back in time, only certain people were granted constitutional rights to vote and those people were the ones that "qualified" to vote and the people qualified to vote were the "informed people". Such isn't the case now and I will grant the premise that perhaps "liberalism" has done away with that and this is why we must revert back to the original intent...only the informed should vote.

In the last election, it is painfully and ruefully obvious that there should be cause to pause and rethink the electoral processes. Especially among the Obama supporters, I wold estimate that at least half - if not more - had no earthly idea why they were voting or for what they were voting. I saw this first hand with our Man On The Street episodes we conducted since the beginning of July to a week before the elections. We also witnessed the same as Howard Stern and others witnessed. The Obama supporters were 100% clueless. This type of electoral malfeasance needs to end.

Americanized liberalism? No thanks.

The last entry in the "liberal" comment is as thus:

What you need is an education. Finally our country IS BEING TAKE BACK from the ignorant and uninformed which you so shamefully represent. oh that's right- Republicans have no shame! They say they are Christians as they support war and torture and the gutting of our great Constitution, written by men who were the Progressives of their times.

I can spend hours and hours on this lunacy. The individual which wrote this utter nonsense is typical of that which we face; the brainwashed lunacy production of the government run reeducation camps we call Public Education and Institutes of Higher Learning...please read the List of 45.

First of all, "their kind" have not taken anything back from anyone...they have successfully pulled off the List of 45 by installing Americanized Socialism in the White House and Congress. They have in affect, committed Treason by overthrowing the United States Constitution and if the Nationalized Health Care, Nationalized Banking Industry, Nationalized Auto Industry projects are fully accomplished, the overthrow will be complete. There isn't anywhere in the Constitution that authorizes any of the above.

The cretin once again alleges the "gutting of our Constitution" without any substantiation. This reveals the over emotional or the emotionally unhinged type of rhetoric. It has no proof and lashes out as the spoiled brat would. The same would go for the "shame" and "war" comments. With no examples or substantiation, these "arguments" are unceremoniously discounted as the childish idiocy it represents.

The "Progressives of their times" is an interesting comment. I agree and always have and through the years of teaching that very concept, I have witnessed the morphing of this and the morphing took an evil turn in the early 1960s. In today's rhetoric, "Progressive" means "socialist" because "liberal" took on an ugly connotation which was handily rejected in the Reagan Era. The Founding Fathers were far from "socialists" and their progressivism was indeed progressive, not socialistic. Semantics people. You have to pay attention to their semantics.

The emotionally unhinged and the wrongfully educated fools in this nation are Clear and Present Dangers and need to be summarily dismissed as such and handily defeated.

The cretin mentioned shame and this will be the last entry of the comments left by the fool. It is the democrats and the "progressives" and the "liberals" and the "socialists" and the "Marxists" that have no shame. They "protect" the animals yet murder the unborn. That is a lack of shame right there and until that is well understood and acted upon I will entertain no "lectures" from the murderous pathological liberal. "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness" is indeed a must read. I am on my third time through it.

In Seattle they've finally found a reason to be proud of this country. The victory of Obama has them thinking about scrawling a flag on construction paper and maybe even putting it somewhere it can be seen, but that would take courage, and Seattle is no place to look for class or courage:

And so it goes. Throughout this country there is one thing that has been proven this election season. Democrats, and liberals in particular, are for the most part intolerant, childish and prone to fascistic impulses. Many studies will tell you that those on the left wallow in hatred and envy, and that explains a lot of unAmerican attitudes easily found there. As one who follows politics closely, I'll be watching Barack Obama closely for what he does on the federal level, but I'm no fool. The real danger can be found in the mindless hordes of leftist followers who are eager to abandon America and her ideals if it can profit them in some way. They are the ones who enforce the dogma on the street, and like Woodrow Wilson's thugs who jailed, beat and murdered those not deemed sufficiently patriotic enough, the glazed eye liberal you pass on the street today may be the black shirted fascisti you will be fighting tomorrow. They'll certainly fight for their freedom to shut down any opposition. Will you fight to invite them to try?

The New Republic states that the GOPers are running scared over the idiot Stevens indictment. Not hardly. The guy is a worm and always has been. He has pretty much stayed out of the limelight because he is way the hell up there in Alaska, a state rarely heard from of of. As is the norm when GOP politicians, at least on the national level, those that get caught and/or identified as charlatans, cretins or otherwise, they are removed from office. That is the rule. Unfortunately, the RINO GOPers don't follow those rules. They are actually democrats in republican clothing. They need to go and hide in a cave never to be heard from again.

In contrast however, the democrats circle the wagons when one of their own gets caught in similar circumstances but that's OK. They are expected to continue in their fraudulent, unethical and illegal activities because that is the only way a democrat can retain their office...cheat rob and steal. And that is an historical fact, much to the chagrin of democrat party politicians...seen Pennsylvania recently? Or that frozen money man from Louisiana?

The New York Slimes blog The Board is obviously upset about facts and Truth. In the recent ad by the McCain Camp depicting Czarbama as an empty suit running on adrenalin via his celebrity status, the Truth is indeed compelling and I find it curious that factual events aren't discussed by the Czarbamatrons. High taxes and war defeats is what The Big O is all about. Get over it. The drooling over the the Big O is obvious and has been exposed. get over it.

Ross Douthat has a message for the Leftinistra in regards to the recent excellent McCain ad...

[...] Here's a tip for liberals: If your candidate is going to stage enormous rallies in front of tens of thousands of chanting Germans (with monuments to Prussian military might in the background) in the middle of his Presidential campaign, it isn't the GOP's fault if the footage comes out looking a little like Hitler at Nuremberg. [END]

Another item for voters to figure out is this: it is the DEMOCRAT Party that lusts for HIGHER gas prices at the pump and not the Republican Party unless those members of the GOP are RINOs. Today, an idiot, Ken Salazar (D-CO) said that even if fuel went to $10 per gallon at the pump, the democrats would not do anything to curtail the bleeding. Video here.

Some think that McCain isn't being very nice and all but that is just too damn bad, isn't it? Who said one has to be nice to an enemy? Is Czarbama being nice when he pulls the race card because there are no black people on American currency? Hello? What an idiot. On that same thought pattern, why is it OK all of a sudden for Czarbama to pull the scare tactic? Oh. Wait. Truth scares the hell out of the run of the mill Leftinistra political hack. I forgot. And, the pathetic drones at the Huff and Puff are saying that McCain is a back-alley thug. That cracked me up. Poor things.

The Goracle is going to be starring at the DNC Convention and I wonder if he is going to admit that he is a liar seeing that Global Warming "continuum" has figured out that he is a liar.

Another Czarbama thug whines about how McCain "is trying" to make it "appear" that Czarbama is "out of touch". No he isn't. That fact is readily apparent and true. He does that exposing every time the fool opens his yapper...you know, like inflating your tires and getting tune ups will solve rising fuel costs. Idiot.

Someone recently said that this election is about "getting even" with the GOP over the 2000 and the 2004 elections. If someone would, please let me know who said that sio I can link it here. However, to prove that true, here is a post by those drunken sots at the Saloon...it seems as though there are "chapters" in the stolen election of 2004. Damned amazing that. And, along those lines of insanity, let us not miss this; the Leftinistra want Rove in prison! That is all so rich and typical of the Liberal Pathology!! Too much really. They cite Pelosi for their cause. Pelosi? The worst SOH of the worst CONgress in recorded history? WOW!

Over at the hang out for swamp dusters, we have a pathetic anti-capitalist thug opining that the reason Dems like Big Oil is what? Simply amazing. These socialist hacks really piss me off, ya know? As if that isn't pathetic enough, we have Wizbang Dead still hacking up lie-balls saying we are in a recession. These people REALLY need to get out more. With their heads so stuffed Czarbamas' hinder hole, they are oxygen depraved on top of being just depraved. With companies reporting all time profits and more jobs being created, how does that translate into a recession again? Just curious.

And, let us not forget about the Alien Invasion...not the illegal Invasionistas but the Real Aliens.

Someone is making this stuff up. This CANNOT be right. At all. Nope. Can't be. This is nuts. I can't even write about it so you will have to crawl over to our friend All American Blogger and read his take and the story. Something about HR 6068. Incredible.

Here we go again with the morons spewing forth that which we already knew...completely and totally ignorant of their surroundings. And the Chief Moron KOSmonoff is the most idiotic of them all.

Screen Shot:

Clearly, the idiots and small children at the KOSmonoff Hide Out don't pay attention.

Commentary by Jimmy Z: The liberals live in fear, of course, not conservatives. No one I know, on the right, fears being bombed by terrorists because we take action to PREVENT it. No one is afraid of homosexuals - disgusted by them? Sure, but that's because we have morals and principles that come from God Almighty, so that's the reason for that.

We don't fear immigration; we embrace it. But we also live by the rule of law, which liberals are happy to set aside for political expediency.

We recognize the hatred for our superior way of life that Islam brings to America. Liberals are blind to it, or hide from it.

ONE OF US faces the truth - conservatives. The other, liberals, run from the truth, lie about what is true, and then call us bad for being honest with Americans about what is genuine and true.

Liberals suck, and the Kos surely proves it with every attempt to denigrate true patriotism. --JZ

There is an oddity that drives the Liberal Proponents of Guilt and Shame to frenzied hate and pitiful rhetoric filled with platitudes, bumper sticker sloganeering and utter contempt for those which do not comply or adhere to the Liberal Pathology.

It is painfully obvious to the vast majority that the over emotional weaklings cannot be trusted to be alone with themselves let alone be in positions of responsibility.

Some time ago, Family Security Matters conducted a study that revealed many issues of the liberal mindset and explained in detail that which most of already knew but did not understand The Why. This group brings to discussion topics such as Liberal pathology, Liberals are like children, A rage that knows no bounds, Fathoming liberal rage, Rage trumps rationality, Symptoms of liberal pathology, Diagnosing liberal pathology, Symptoms of liberal pathology and Diagnosing liberal pathology.

Rick Moran has attempted to clarify the Liberal Mindset of BDS but to this writer, it falls short of the mindset. The mental disorder that is all so prevalent in the psychological make up of the modern day Liberal has been further diagnosed and made public by Charles Krauthammer. Among other things: From 1975-1978, Krauthammer was a Resident and then a Chief Resident in Psychiatry at the Massachusetts General Hospital. During this time he and a colleague identified a form of mania (a part of bipolar disorder) which they named "secondary mania" and published a second important paper. The standard textbook for bipolar disease ("Manic Depressive Illness" by Goodwin and Jamison) contains nine citations of his work.

I wrote the following at Digital Journal on 1/28, received 10 votes and some "personal contacts" letting me know what a Nazi Fascist I am. Good. That means I am doing my job...Digital Journal is a Canadian citizen journalist site and it is packed with socialist dhimmis. Go figure. I also wrote a piece that was "deactivated" because it was considered "hate speech" by Canadian Law seeing that you cannot speak the truth about the Islamic Global Cultural Jihad in Canada...ask Steyn.

You think that if someone is getting richer, someone, somewhere, must be getting poorer.

You think that protesters outside nuclear power plants are dedicated activists, but protesters outside abortion clinics are dangerous zealots interfering with a legal activity.

You believe that more federal regulations will make your life better.

You believe that even though the top 20 percent of taxpayers pay 80 percent of income taxes, that the rich are not paying their "fair share".

You think that Rush Limbaugh's listeners are mindless dittoheads, but you have never doubted anything that you heard from Michael Moore.

You believe in global warming today just as firmly as you believed in global cooling back in the 1970s.

You believe that the network news is a better indicator of what "real" news is than talk radio, Internet news sites, and blogs.

You believe that there was never, ever a problem with biased news coverage until FOX News went on the air.

You believe that Mikhail Gorbachev deserves more credit for losing the Cold War than Ronald Reagan deserves for winning it.

Your parents gave you an acre of preserved rain forest for your first birthday.

You cannot name a single NASCAR driver.

You mentally subtract 100 points from someone's IQ if the person speaks with a Southern accent.

You think that Dan Rather got a raw deal.

You panic if you discover that you're out of chickpeas.

You think that the phrase "separation of church and state" is in the Constitution.

You pride yourself on your global awareness, global sensitivity, and global outlook, but can't name your state legislator or school board representative.

You are dedicated to helping the poor, the downtrodden, and the less fortunate, but you have never given blood.

You have not seen The Passion of the Christ, and you don't know anyone who has seen it.

You believe that a woman should make it on her own, without depending on her husband (except for Hillary Clinton).

You believe that professional, working women should never be judged on their appearance (except for Katherine Harris).

You believe that rich people should not be allowed to contribute so much money to candidates for office (except for George Soros).

You believe that government should make a special effort to hire members of traditionally oppressed groups, such as African-Americans (except for Clarence Thomas, Colin Powell, and Condoleezza Rice).

You feel a deep sense of common cause with oppressed groups, such as Hispanic immigrants (except for Cuban-Americans fleeing Castro).

You believe that a mother's wishes for her child, especially a mother's last, dying wish for her child, should outweigh the wishes of a father who had long before deserted his family (unless the child is named Elian Gonzalez).

You think people in south Florida, who can't figure out how to work a butterfly ballot, ought to have the final say in choosing the president of the United States.

You have no problem with Hollywood movie stars flying around in private jets to give speeches on the evils of SUVs.

You think that raising taxes will reduce the budget deficit.

You deplore prejudice and bigotry in all its forms, but think that everyone in the "red states" is an idiot.

You are more concerned, more often, with the rights of convicted felons than you are with the rights of small business owners.

You uphold a woman's right to choose, unless a woman chooses adoption, chooses to be a stay-at-home mom, chooses to homeschool, or chooses to start a business.

You are more concerned with Vice-President Cheney's links to Halliburton than with Saddam Hussein's links to international terrorism.

You have used the phrase, "in Europe, the government pays for health care and vacation," without irony.

You are worried about how the French view Americans.

You believe that nativity scenes should be banned from public view, but that anyone objecting to pornography "only has to look the other way."

You think that consenting adults can engage freely in every activity except capitalism.

You named your children Moonglow and Arizona.

You think the really alarming violence takes place outside the abortion clinic.

You've ever referred to the "root cause" of something.

You pray to "The Woman Upstairs."

You think we never gave peace a chance.

You had to be told that "Manhattan," "menopause," and "boycott" were not sexist words.

You begin sentences with the words "I feel."

Your driver's license has a hyphen, because for you one last name just isn't enough.

You don't think All in the Family is a very funny program, but watch it anyway because Meathead makes a lot of sense.

You think OJ is out looking for the real killers.

You think Julia Sugarbaker is an astute social commentator.

You think it takes a village.

You think that the words "to promote the general welfare" in the Constitution mean to promote welfare generally.

You think that, even though more people voted against him than for him in both the 1992 and the 1996 presidential elections, Bill Clinton had a mandate.

You think that conservatives, like preservatives, ought to be federally regulated.

You ever wore earth shoes.

You have ever wondered out loud, "Why can't we all just get along?"

You think the New York Times prints all the news that's fit.

You spent Columbus Day reading Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee.

You reach the limits of your talent and then complain that you ran into a glass ceiling.

You wear more ribbons on your lapel than in your hair.

You think that the really dangerous McCarthy was Joe, not Eugene.

You blame the Unabomber's parents.

You fail to see the connection between Lenin and Lennon.

You have ever agreed with Martin Sheen or Barbara Streisand.

You refuse to admit that you're a leftist, and accuse anyone of calling you a leftist of McCarthyism.

__________________QUOTE OF THE WEEK:

"It is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand." - John Adams

~Snooper~What drives the Leftinistra and their moppets called Moonbats? Simplifying the answer, via the shortened version is BDS. Many moons ago back in January 2007, the Strategy Page posted a relevant piece, revealing that which we already knew but placed in a one-stop shop. The lauded piece is entitled "Top 10 Myths of The Iraq War". (HT to Dr Sanity)One will need to visit the link provided to read the ill-fated and now defunct and debunked verbiage. I'll not waste key strokes placing the verbiage here.MYTH ONENo Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

Not to beleaguer the reader with a plethora of "We told you so" verbiage, access the page linked and read the whole report that the Leftinistra will not accept. I will, however, start the education process. The WMD issue was and is still very real:

Finally, there are some definitive answers to the mystery of the missing WMD. Civilian volunteers, mostly retired intelligence officers belonging to the non-partisan IntelligenceSummit.org, have been poring over the secret archives captured from Saddam Hussein. The inescapable conclusion is this: Saddam really did have WMD after all, but not in the way the Bush administration believed. A 9,000 word research paper with citations to each captured document has been posted online at LoftusReport.com, along with translations of the captured Iraqi documents, courtesy of Mr. Ryan Mauro and his friends.

This Iraqi document research has been supplemented with satellite photographs and dozens of interviews, among them David Gaubatz who risked radiation exposure to locate Saddam's underwater WMD warehouses , and John Shaw, whose brilliant detective work solved the puzzle of where the WMD went. Both have contributed substantially to solving one of the most difficult mysteries of our decade. [...]

On top of the "banned weapons" and "associated equipment" found in Iraq during the progression of the War In Iraq, John Loftus and the myriad of investigators are still working out the details.

MYTH TWOThe 2003 Invasion was Illegal

This is the classic "prove me wrong" rhetoric which is entirely baseless and fraudulent in the very premise of the ill-fated argument. A State of War between Iraq and The United States was still in affect since the cease-fire "agreement" in 1991. Before the Persian Gulf War ever began against the occupiers of Kuwait, the President received the proper authorization to drive Saddam from Kuwait. One can conclude that it was a "legal op". The cease-fire agreement was negotiated and a State of War existed until such a time that Saddam fully complied. He never did and continually fired on Coalition Forces for nearly 12 years which redsulted in UN Resolution 1441. Hence, the "legality" of the war is a moot point.

MYTH THREESanctions were working

Yes, and I am the King of Siam. One would have to be a mental midget to think that and the proof is in the multiple UN Resolutions violated and gone widely ignored by Saddam. Des the scandal known as Oil For Food ring a bell? A Texan mans has recently been convicted of that scandal, by the way. I suppose GWB conspired that one as well, eh?

MYTH FOUROverthrowing Saddam Only Helped Iran

Another logical fallacy and no one has come up with a viable example to support the claim. Iran has taken advantages yes and as been perpetrating Acts Of War against the United States internal of Iraq. Our cowards in DC are spineless to do anything about that, however.

MYTH FIVEThe Invasion Was a Failure

Well, tell that to the People of Iraq these days. Perhaps the Leftinistra should pay more attention to reality. Even Murthadisagrees.

MYTH SIXThe Invasion Helped Al Qaeda

To do what? Self-destruct as they have? OBL in recent months has conceded defeat and as AQ did in Afghanistan as we trounced AQ and the Taliban - leaving a few behind to carry on the battle and move on - so it is now. Just in case no one has been paying attention. The fighting has relocated to Afghanistan and Pakistan. I find it increasingly difficult to comprehend why the moonbats hang onto this pathetic argument.

MYTH SEVENIraq Is In A State of Civil War

Again, peace is breaking out all over Iraq.

MYTH EIGHTIraqis Were Better Off Under Saddam

This argument is so retarded I won't dignify it with the obvious to the oblivious.

MYTH NINEThe Iraq War Caused Islamic Terrorism to Increase in Europe

See MYTH EIGHT answer.

MYTH TENThe War in Iraq is Lost

See MYTH SEVEN answer. This is a no brainer if one has been paying attention for the last 9 months.

The Leftinistra are a sorry lot. Their moonbat moppets are even worse.Dr Sanity goes on to explain pretty much the Pathology involved that drive the moonbats and the Leftinistra. The first three paragraphs will be placed here but you have to go read the other 20+ or so.

The fact that Iraq has sort of dropped off the radar of both the MSM and the Democrats should tell you how fast both are retreating from their original talking points. They know that promoting defeat at this point in time is a losing stance for them in 2008--except of course, for the lunatic fringe of their base. Meanwhile, Bush's poll numbers seem to be rising, much to Democrat's dismay...and their own Congressional approval rating hovers near record lows.The Democrats and the left live (and die) by polls. Popularity means everything to them. Other people's opinions are the foundation of all their "principled" stands on issues--so watch for a significant shift in their principles in the days to come.But let's not deceive ourselves. Such a shift would not indicate any real alteration of their unbelievable self-induced blindness and utter refusal to acknowledge the realities of Islamic fanaticism and the war on terror. To do that would require a fundamental re-assessment of their socialist/leftist/PC ideology itself. [...]

Can I hear an AMEN? I could have sworn that I wrote those three paragraphs!!Moonbat intelligence -- an oxymoron.

~Snooper~We have all heard of the Pathology of Liberalism and we have also heard that Liberalism is a Mental Disorder. However, I haven't read what the Pathology of a Defeatist is...until now. First, however, we must define what "defeatism" "IS". Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary: acceptance of or resignation to defeat. A defeatist, then, is one which actively prescribes to the "all is lost" and the Trekkish "resistance is futile" mantra. The last I was taught, learned and came to believe, no one likes a loser and, for the most part, no one of substance and character will accept defeat, especially when there is even an outside chance of victory. A loser, is one that gives up too easily in the face of adversity and if the going gets too tough and, they haven't either the mental or physical stamina to maintain.The Pathology of a Defeatist follows closely with that of the Pathology of Liberalism due to the inability to overcome the childish mindset based on emotions and emotions only, regardless of facts readily prevalent and/or known. In the face of facts presented, the Defeatist will deny that which is obvious even to the oblivious. A Defeatist has the mind set that proclaims that they are correct because they said that they were, regardless of evidence to the contrary.It won't matter to Senator Harry Reid that Iraqis are demanding the destruction of Al Qaida, by holding hunger strikes. It won't matter to SoH Pelosi that the number of Iraqi citizens killed has tremendously dropped and it won't matter to Biden that American casualties has also drastically dropped. It won't matter to Kucinich that reconciliation is breaking out in the north, either. Sometimes I have to wonder if the Defeatists, no matter the party affiliation, can tell the difference between day and night.In regards to the War In Iraq, the worse news to the Defeatist Mind Set is declining casualties; American, Coalition or Civilian and, victorious battles over the enemy and that same enemy declaring that they have lost the War In Iraq. It goes against the grain of the Defeatist Mind Set and they whine and squirm and resort to the known failed and wrong-headed rhetoric. Even the news that American Troops are on their way home is bad news to the Defeatist because they did not force the issue...it was preplanned and according to plan. This causes the Defeatist to change the topic and discussion at hand.Substantiation of emotionally driven drivel is an aspect of daily discourse considered to be anathema or alien to the very nature of the Defeatist Mind Set. Emotion demands to be reconciled and in the spot light of verifiable facts, the Defeatist cannot maintain any semblance of credibility. The Defeatist will forgo or forswear facts to maintain their discredited mantra, no matter the cause. In regards to the War In Iraq, victory scares the current crop of American Defeatists, no matter if they are in political positions or any number of anti-Americanist groups and public opinion, when flowing away from the preconceived truth will be widely ignored.

While most of us were enjoying turkey for Thanksgiving dinner, Rep. Jack Murtha (D-Johnstown), was eating a little crow. "I think the surge is working," Rep. Murtha said last week after a quick holiday visit to Iraq. The observation isn't remarkable. The signs of progress in Iraq are so obvious that even the New York Times has begun to report them. [...]

This is what has our home-grown Defeatists in a squabbling throe of contempt and trembling fit of woe-is-me-itis. The BDS runs deep...ever since 2000. As disingenuous as a Defeatist is, deep down, they must know what they themselves are...emotionally unhinged. Some would say that it is time for Defeatists to resign from political offices once they have declared themselves irrelevant.I often ask myself why it is and, what is the driving force behind the Defeatist Mind Set as so demonstrated recently by Senator Harry Reid. As long ago as October in the year of our Lord 2007, Osama Bin Ladenadmitted defeat in Iraq. His mission there is lost. Yet, "mister" Reid seems to discount that because it goes against the individuals he must cater to in order to maintain political office.The pathetic Poster Boy of Silly, one "mister" Reid, is so far behind the curve, it is still unbelievable that anyone even bothers to grant him an audience...must be one of those benevolent traits of some. For an example of how "mister" Reid declared that he will never believe any Good News coming from Iraq under any circumstances, please visit my friends at Flopping Aces and review the video therein.The Pathology of A Defeatist is as follows: I believe what I believe no matter the evidence to the contrary. I cannot accept that I might be wrong on any issue because if I admit to being wrong on any issue, I will be seen as untrustworthy. Therefore, I can never be wrong; therefore, I never am wrong, no matter what.In case this data has escaped the Reids of the world, the fighting has shifted back to Afghanistanand nowPakistan. Iranistan may or may not be in the mix yet but I am sure it is coming, one day...hopefully not but they sure do like to rattle their sabers.Catch the wave at memeorandum

~Snooper~What are the Democratic Party Elites to do? Should they dump the insignificant and mouthy trolls of the moonbats in the Far Left Fruit Loop Brigades and come clean?Should they apologize en mass to President Bush for turning the War In Iraq into a political quagmire?Should they apologize en mass to The Troops for attempting to fatally demoralize The Troops?Should they censure Reid, Pelosi, Murtha and a plethora of others for their subversive, seditious and treasonous rhetoric all in the name of the Almighty Politik?Or, should they all resign and sink into obscurity that they so richly deserve?Or, perhaps they should come clean, be honest, show some spine and come forward, en mass, proclaiming that they were wrong and that it was all a political game they were playing and have lost their bid to lose a winnable war?No. They haven't an ethical bone in their worthless bodies.In the Boston Globe, just a few moments ago, I read the following:

THE NEWS from Iraq has been so encouraging in recent months that last week even the mainstream media finally sat up and took notice. Can the Democratic Party be far behind? [...]

The Democratic Party is unable to do so. They cannot admit that they played an instrumental part in enabling the enemy. The insignificant and vocal minority of the Moonbat Fruit Loop Brigades were given a voice that suited the Democratic Party Elites and it will cost them. Their only chance at survival is to distract and change the subject. They can only ignore the Voices From The War and we in The New Media...the ones that were right all along.They bring up those that served that were instrumental in the poor planning and poor ROE that wrought untold harm to our men and women in uniform, to prattle and yammer on about how we need to pull the troops out. Those "fired" and relieved commanders could not produce so the Leftinistra parade them around in the hopes that the Loser Mentality can remain alive in the face of defeatist rhetoric. They will play these cards to the bloody end.The Abyss of Obscurity is too good for them all.Naturally, the individual that wrote the article, had to throw a little barb in due to their not having a clue what the term "Mission Accomplished" means and why it was used. However, that is more than explained here:

[...] Of course things could still change for the worse. In the Middle East there are few guarantees. Neither the US military nor the Bush administration plans to dust off that "Mission Accomplished" banner anytime soon. [...]

All in all, it is a very well written article withe not so bad barbs thrown in here and there.There can be no denying that the "war is lost" quagmire still being ranted on about was an outright lie and there can be no more doubt as to the "winnability" of this war. Would it not behoove the Democratic Party Elite to rally behind the troops as they did in the beginning? Is this possible? This DAV very much doubts it. It would send their base into an absolute frenzy. They would "Rather" have the vast majority of Americans in a rabid frenzy over their unpatriotic actions and rhetoric than to get a moonbat angry, self-integrity be damned.

[...] Blind opposition to war that seems lost is understandable. But can Democrats be so invested in defeat that they would abandon even a war that may be winnable? With developments in Iraq looking so hopeful, this is no time to cling to a counsel of despair. [...]

It is the mindset of a defeatist to abhor Victory at all costs, plain and simple.Catch the wave:Discussions at Memeorandum here:New York Times, NY Daily News, JustOneMinute and The Strata-SphereIt would also behoove the Democratic Party Elites and the RINOs to take a serious look in their mirrors and ask themselves why the anti-war and anti-Americanist Hollyweird movies are bombs...especially that pathetic "Redacted" tripe. Americans are tired of hearing how rotten the American Military is because they know it to be false.Also, they need to figure out why it is that their measures to lose in Iraq get defeated time after time after time and that the Worse President in the world and the Dumbest Man beats them time after time after time. It really doesn't say mush for them when the Worse President in the world and the Dumbest Man crushes them on a regular basis.They really should just close the yappers and let folks think they are stupid than to open their filthy mouths and remove all doubt.

I received the below in my email and I am placing it here. The message came from a member of or Private Group, Patriots For Conservative Values.

Let's review. Democrats get their money from fringe wacko kooks who hate America. Democrats have to do what the fringe wacko kooks tell them to do in order to keep the checks rolling in. Democrats are more interested in keeping the checks coming in than they are their own dignity and self-respect.

You are free to share, to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix, to adapt the work under the following conditions: Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights.
''