Can I get a way to contact those who can make decisions based on this season as the Talk with the Author thread isn't being responded anymore. This week(passed) had a major missing element: the Armor Square, and without it, DM's had to either improvise, or I am sure in some cases, looked over/ignored it. I would like to update this thread as much as necessary, but with the current lack of support, eratta is very difficult.

The Oozes had an immediate Reaction power that was usable when they took damage on their turn. Since you can't use Immediate Actions during your turn it was useless... I played it instead as a free action.

honestly, since it was really just the location of where the treasure was, did the specific location REALLY matter? Just pick the middle of one of the larger pool areas. done!

but yeah, the immediate on their turn was a little off. we just crossed off the "on its turn" part. But then, I've decided this season I'm pretty much gonna run the mod as I feel anyway since that's what last seasons author kept saying "Make it your own". Treat the adventures as an outline to build on, not handcuffs to stick to.

There actually is a treasure square on the map, but it's just inside the next area (it's the big `T' on the map). Clearly, the treasure was moved between editing and the cartography step. I had no trouble putting it in a different water square (since I liked the description given in the encounter); I had the PCs roll Perception to see who spotted it first (but there was no chance that it wouldn't be found by *someone*).

This season's author has also said ``Make it your own'' (more or less) several times, and I've found that generally my tables are responding well to that idea. One thing that I didn't do (but planned to, and forgot) was to get from everyone what type of armor they were wearing before the adventure, so that when they rolled to see who got the item, I could describe what they found appropriately. I'm sure most of the players knew exactly what I was doing, but I think it helps the narrative flow anyway.

actually, the T is from the other map for the next encounter, and it's where the T monsters is. Its not the treasure square.

Good catch. Quite possible that the wrong `T' was removed from the map during an editing step, then; I hadn't noticed that there was a `T' monster in the next encounter. (The treasure square is supposed to be marked with a T, in case it wasn't obvious).

My point with this post is not to ridicule anyone, but mainly to point out that all of you were making assumptions. While this is okay at your table, this is an errata thread: not a thread where errors are assumed corrected, but officially corrected.

honestly, since it was really just the location of where the treasure was, did the specific location REALLY matter? Just pick the middle of one of the larger pool areas. done!

but yeah, the immediate on their turn was a little off. we just crossed off the "on its turn" part. But then, I've decided this season I'm pretty much gonna run the mod as I feel anyway since that's what last seasons author kept saying "Make it your own". Treat the adventures as an outline to build on, not handcuffs to stick to.

It does matter, as this is the ERRATA thread, not the WING IT thread. (No hostility intended)

There actually is a treasure square on the map, but it's just inside the next area (it's the big `T' on the map). Clearly, the treasure was moved between editing and the cartography step. I had no trouble putting it in a different water square (since I liked the description given in the encounter); I had the PCs roll Perception to see who spotted it first (but there was no chance that it wouldn't be found by *someone*).

This season's author has also said ``Make it your own'' (more or less) several times, and I've found that generally my tables are responding well to that idea. One thing that I didn't do (but planned to, and forgot) was to get from everyone what type of armor they were wearing before the adventure, so that when they rolled to see who got the item, I could describe what they found appropriately. I'm sure most of the players knew exactly what I was doing, but I think it helps the narrative flow anyway.

(Again, no hostility intended, though I have the tendency to sound--) You should notice it is a creature icon if it is a letter surrounded by a circle. That is why the ropes were marked with an "X".

actually, the T is from the other map for the next encounter, and it's where the T monsters is. Its not the treasure square.

Good catch. Quite possible that the wrong `T' was removed from the map during an editing step, then; I hadn't noticed that there was a `T' monster in the next encounter. (The treasure square is supposed to be marked with a T, in case it wasn't obvious).

Probably not, Wizards didn't even remove the part of tthe map hanging at the top, why would they try to remove a creature square? And if they did, like I stated before, I think they would use a different kind of mark than the creature squares, like for instance the ropes' "X"s.

Interestingly, I don't see anything ``official'' about any of your errata, and I'm wondering why you do?

The head of the program (Title: D&D Organized Play Content Developer) told me that the `T' square was the intended location of the Treasure square, and that it was probably a mistake, and that we should put it whereever we felt was appropriate. Is that `official' enough for you?

Interestingly, I don't see anything ``official'' about any of your errata, and I'm wondering why you do?

The head of the program (Title: D&D Organized Play Content Developer) told me that the `T' square was the intended location of the Treasure square, and that it was probably a mistake, and that we should put it whereever we felt was appropriate. Is that `official' enough for you?

Note the one errata does have a source. The author. Give me a source, and an EXACT location, and you have made an "Official" errata. So long as the source isn't full of it, that is.

As I said, I did not `assume' anything; I asked the head of the program, and reported what he said.

Given that you don't have `official' errata for anything, and that the question concerns a session in the past, I doubt you'll find anything more official, but I wish you the best of luck in your efforts to find something.

Please keep your posts polite, respectful, on-topic, and refrain from personal attacks and flaming, these are violations of the Code of Conduct. You can review the Code here: wizards.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wizards.cfg... . You are welcome to disagree with one another but please do so respectfully and constructively.

************

Please return discussion to the topic of the thread, or it may need to be closed.

As I said, I did not `assume' anything; I asked the head of the program, and reported what he said.

Given that you don't have `official' errata for anything, and that the question concerns a session in the past, I doubt you'll find anything more official, but I wish you the best of luck in your efforts to find something.

And given how there has been pretty much no (or very very seldom) "official" errata for ANY of the seasons, pretty much everything is going to be just suggestions and 'wing-it'. The best you can hope for really is semi-sanctioned 'wing-it' from the author or director, but even that isn't actually "official" most of the time.