Missteps Abound During Mitt Romney's Europe Trip

Tour de Gaffes:Romney Flops in Europe

He's only been abroad for a week, but the Palestinians are accusing him of racism, the Brits are annoyed and Polish union leaders don't like him. Mitt Romney's trip to Europe and the Middle East has been marred by one fumble after the next.

AP

In the end, Mitt Romney tried to find something positive to say about his European adventure. He said an important lesson he had learned is that "rejection of one kind or another is going to be an important part of everyone's life."

The remark didn't come after the Republican presidential candidate's snafu-filled European tour over the past week. He made it after spending two years as a missionary for the Mormon Church in France in the 1960s, according to his biographers Michael Kranish and Scott Helman in their recent book "The Real Romney". He only managed to convert 10 to 20 people during that time.

Fast forward to last week in Europe, and things haven't really gone any better for Romney. His visits to Britain, Israel or Poland didn't go very well. The result has again been rejection of one kind or another. And the candidate has only himself to blame for this gaffe-filled tour.

A Difficult Trip

It was telling that Romney's spokeswoman, Andrea Sail, was on the defensive right from the start of the trip. At one point she said his words had been "grossly mischaracterized," and at another she denied them completely, saying they were "not true". By Tuesday, his staff was so frustrated that one spokesperson told reporters with the American press corps to "shove it" after they tried to ask questions about his myriad missteps.

First Romney took a swipe at the British, questioning their preparations for the Olympic Games and their enthusiasm. Then, in Jerusalem, he directly compared Israeli gross domestic product to Palestinian per capita GDP, attributing the Israeli's economic vitality to their culture, while at the same time ignoring the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories. On Monday, Romney's trip continued to Poland, where the left-leaning national daily Gazeta Wyborcza asked: "Will there be further blunders?"

Things actually went pretty well for Romney on Monday. A visit to the Gdansk shipyard, the birthplace of the Solidarity trade union movement that led the Polish struggle against communism in the 1980s, provided the kind of symbolism Romney favors. He met former Solidarity leader and democracy hero Lech Walesa, who last year refused a meeting with US President Barack Obama but practically gave Romney his endorsement this week. "I wish you to be successful because this success is needed to the United States, of course, but to Europe and the rest of the world, too. Governor Romney, get your success -- be successful," Walesa said through a translator.

But the visit also led to irritation. Solidarity officials criticized the meeting. "Regretfully, we have learned from our friends in the American trade union central AFL-CIO representing 12 million workers about Mitt Romney's support for the attacks against trade unions and labor rights," Andrzej Adamczyk, the head of the union's international department, wrote in a statement.

Romney also failed to find support in areas where one might generally expect him to. In an editorial headlined "No Illusions," the conservative daily Rzeczpospolita wrote the visit was "doubtlessly a nice gesture, but we shouldn't attach too much importance to the event."

It is precisely with these sorts of pleasant gestures that Romney is hoping to impress voters back home in swing states like Michigan, which are home to large numbers of voters with Polish roots. For months, Romney has been seeking to distinguish himself as a critic of Russia, labelling Poland's neighbor as America's "No. 1 geopolitical foe". He won't forget to mention that when he meets Poland's president and foreign minister on Tuesday, and then holds a speech on the value of freedom.

Can it suffice to save his unsuccessful trip? Hardly. The European tour of Barack Obama before the 2008 election is remembered here for the speech he gave to 200,000 people in Berlin. Romney's trip will be remembered for his gaffes.

Things went wrong right from the start of the trip in London, where even Prime Minister David Cameron reprimanded the candidate. "Of course it's easier if you hold an Olympic Games in the middle of nowhere," Cameron said, referring to Romney's management of the 2002 Olympic Winter Games in Salt Lake City, Utah. And then Romney flubbed by telling the press about what was supposed to be a secret meeting with the head of Britain's MI6 intelligence agency.

Romney Angers Palestinians

In Israel, Romney opted for strong messages in a bid to finally score points with Jewish Americans. Gallup polls show Obama with a particularly large lead among this group, with 68 percent of American Jews supporting the president compared to just 25 percent for Romney. But the Republican candidate is equally concerned about attracting the votes of Christian fundamentalists, who tend to appreciate sharp rhetoric when it comes to Middle East policies.

It didn't go well. Speaking to 40 campaign donors in Jerusalem's King David Hotel, Romney said "culture and a few other things" were to thank for the country's economic power. He then went on to compare Israel with the Palestinian territories, saying Israel's per-capita income was more than twice as high. "You notice such a dramatically stark difference in economic vitality," he said. Cultural superiority? Oh dear. "Grossly mischaracterized," Romney's spokeswoman would later say.

This comparison -- which was also incorrect given that the World Bank states that actual Israel's per-capita income is actually 20 times higher -- has infuriated Palestinians. "It is a racist statement," said Saeb Erekat, a senior aide to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. "This man doesn't realize that the Palestinian economy cannot reach its potential because there is an Israeli occupation." Admittedly, Erakat made no mention of Palestinian policies, but he still managed to catch Romney in a Mideast policy gaffe. "It seems to me this man lacks information, knowledge, vision and understanding of this region and its people," Erakat told the Associated Press.

Indeed, Romney's trip to the Middle East turned out to be a perplexing one. Further angering Palestinians, Romney went on to describe Jerusalem as Israel's capital, stating he would like to move the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to the city. Even the US government doesn't recognize Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem.

The trip has cast doubt on whether Romney has the stature to hold the United States' highest office.

White House officials are predictably satisfied with Romney's performance. "It is clear that there are some people who have taken a look at those comments and are scratching their heads a little bit," said White House spokesman Josh Earnest. Even harsher criticism came from the Obama campaign itself, where spokeswoman Jen Psaki said Romney's foreign trip had been overshadowed by a series of "fumbles". As if that weren't enough, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak even came forward with praise for Obama, telling CNN: "This administration under President Obama is doing, in regard to our security, more than anything that I can remember in the past."

In recent days, it appears as though Romney has actually improved Obama's chances of re-election.

For reasons of data protection and privacy, your IP address will only be stored if you are a registered user of Facebook and you are currently logged in to the service. For more detailed information, please click on the "i" symbol.

I would not be proud of this article. It took two of you to write meaningless such story!
One side calls it a flop.
The other side likes it.
What else is not new?
Obama is not going to get re-elected and maybe politics [...]

I would not be proud of this article. It took two of you to write meaningless such story!
One side calls it a flop.
The other side likes it.
What else is not new?
Obama is not going to get re-elected and maybe politics needs someone who tells it like it is. What is obvious is that this article is biased. European popularity never got any US president elected. Romney is very deliberate and what he says has to be taken at face value. His positions are set, whether you like them or not, they can't be taken as gaffes.
You might not want to start your article out belittling his churches missionary service in France. You try to convert anyone in France to an American religion. "Only" 10 to 20 is an extremely successful number. At least he speaks French fluently. My understanding of Mormon missions are that they are character and leadership training grounds for young 19 year old men. Success is not measured by the number of baptisms. And since the US is a very religious country with established civil rights of religion, I would stay away from that topic, lest you get into a very sensitive american topic of religion and bigotry.
In Britain, you could clearly see that he was talking like an executive evaluating the Olympic business. All we saw was Obama's friends acting up!
In Israel, he came down so strong on the Israeli side since the Jewish vote is so influential and much more dominate than any Palestinian voting block in the US. He is trying to get elected in the US, not Europe or the Middle East!
In Poland, Obama's friends got the unions to act up. Who cares? Romney is not going to get the union vote in the US. The unions are not that powerful in the US.
Romney is not trying to be a diplomat, at this point, even though he probably needs to improve those skills. He is trying to get elected President of the US. He did absolutely no damage here in the US.
The voting blocks are set already here. Democrats are going to vote for Obama. Republicans are going to vote for Romney. They are equal in size. The only question is who will the Independents go for, since they will decide the election? Independents don't care what the White House thinks or what Der Spiegel thinks!
The more games Obama and his stooges play, the more he irritates the independents! As an Independent, I can feel that Obama has already lost it! It is bordering on desperation. Its over! Get used to it!

2. The Judges of the trip will be US Voters

lakechamplainer 07/31/2012

The voters of the US will decide whether Romney's trip was a success or not. I am no fan of Romney or Obama, but will probably vote for Romney because Obama has failed (I voted for Obama four years ago because the Republicans had [...]

The voters of the US will decide whether Romney's trip was a success or not. I am no fan of Romney or Obama, but will probably vote for Romney because Obama has failed (I voted for Obama four years ago because the Republicans had failed.) I did not vote for Romney to be Governor of Massachusetts.
US voters don't really care what the world thinks of our Presidential Candidates. They are running for President of the US, not President of the World. The visit to Israel was probably a plus for Romney. The visits to Britain and Poland were probably pluses also.
I remember Obama's visit to Germany when running in 2008 where he was met by a crowd of 75,000 adoring Germans. This is a negative to most Americans.
I remember Obama receiving the Nobel Peace Prize right after he entered office, when he had done absolutely nothing to deserve it. This was definitely a negative to most Americans.

3. Nice hit piece

Texaninmainz 07/31/2012

Wow! What a slanted, pro-Obama piece. No balance here at all. Of course, it's Spiegel. Of course they want Obama. He will bring the U.S. to it's knees. It will be brought to third world status. Germany and France (ok, maybe not) [...]

Wow! What a slanted, pro-Obama piece. No balance here at all. Of course, it's Spiegel. Of course they want Obama. He will bring the U.S. to it's knees. It will be brought to third world status. Germany and France (ok, maybe not) will finally call the shots in the world again. Forget Russia. Forget China. Spiegal only wants the U.S. pulled down- as it has for the last 25 or more years.