As an artist, I understand optical illusions…this is more than an illusionGuy EdwardsEditor of Bigfoot Lunch Club

First, we want to say there simply is not enough visual information in the Provo Canyon Bigfoot video to make a definitive determination. With that said, initially we were certain that foliage in the foreground was creating the negative space defining the Bigfoot’s left arm.

We had a feeling that the yellow foliage in the foreground was creating the negative space between the arm and the body. We felt like this illusion added to the eerie-ness to the action of the Bigfoot standing up, which also made this video a must-watch! After we stabilized and reviewed the slow motion, we definitely found foreground foliage was creating some of the negative space, but behind that there is definitive negative space NOT created by the foreground foliage. In other words the gap between the body and the “arm” is most likely there.

We don’t think this was able to conclude until we saw the stabilized version.

We always felt like the reaction of the videographers/hikers were genuine which we think was the second component of this video being compelling.

About Guy EdwardsPsychology reduces to biology, all biology to chemistry, chemistry to physics, and finally physics to mathematical logic.
Guy Edwards is host of the Portland, OR event HopsSquatch.com.

14 Responses to “Provo Canyon Bigfoot Video Stabilized”

I agree 100% with redpill.. In my humble opinion its back is to the camera when it stands..

I am however leaning towards it being a legit vid.

It would be extremely helpful if someone (original witness) would return to site and put someone in the same spot for scale.. it looks pretty massive but without any reference its hard to tell.. I would also 100% agree that it is not a bear. At the moment thats about all I can say though..

Given the high number of very probable hoaxes going around, and the natural propensity of young men to want to jump on that bandwagon, I’m not really excited about this one.

I very well remember how frustrated I was as a teenager when my credibility was questioned. Now, looking back on the boy I was, I understand completely why it would have been so. Sorry guys. You may have really filmed a Squatch. Only you know for sure, and that is about all you’re probably going to get out of this one.

(And let me just add: Anytime you need to “edit out negative space” to make something discernible to the viewer…well, you’ve lost considerable evidentiary value before you’ve even shown the first frame.)

Meanwhile, the BFRO database grew by 10 eyewitness accounts since the first of the month. That is a pretty typical rate, of late. And the explanations for these from thems that would say “no evidence….?”

Seems to me if they were ballsy enough to film (what they thought was) a bear from that close, they could have stayed put while Sasquatch ambled off in the opposite direction… or at least until s/he cleared the thicket, but right as we think we’re going to see something… perfect timing.

Squatchy stories are all the rage lately, kids are dying to create them… literally.

“It’s amazing… when people want to see something… and already have an opinion in their head… the human mind will do anything to justify that position.

you see this all the time with big footers and other crypto stuff… and you’re seeing a perfect example here.”

And you also see it on here, all the time, with those who for reasons unknown to those of us familiar with the evidence will grasp at any straw they can – in the absence of a scrap of evidence of their own – to assert that the sasquatch isn’t real.

Just sayin’, not sayin’ you’re one of them, and I don’t know what the heck this video shows, and it really doesn’t matter.

And I agree with Ploughboy that just because you think you filmed a sasquatch – whether you did or not – doesn’t mean you actually have a video worth anything…except, if you did, to you.