Annual Appeal: Please make a donation to keep the OEIS running. In 2018 we replaced the server with a faster one, added 20000 new sequences, and reached 7000 citations (often saying "discovered thanks to the OEIS").

The representation of the compositions (for fixed n) is as lists of parts, the order between individual compositions (for the same n) is (list-)reversed lexicographic; see the example by Omar E. Pol. - Joerg Arndt, Sep 03 2013

This is the standard ordering for compositions in this database; it is similar to the Mathematica ordering for partitions (A080577). Other composition orderings include A124734 (similar to the Abramowitz & Stegun ordering for partitions, A036036), A108244 (similar to the Maple partition ordering, A080576), etc (see crossrefs).

Factorize each term in A057335; sequence records the values of the resulting exponents. It also runs through all possible permutations of multiset digits.

This can be regarded as a table in two ways: with each composition as a row, or with the compositions of each integer as a row. The first way has A000120 as row lengths and A070939 as row sums; the second has A001792 as row lengths and A001788 as row sums. - Franklin T. Adams-Watters, Nov 06 2006

See sequence A261300 for another version where the terms of each composition are concatenated to form one single integer: (0, 1, 2, 11, 3, 21, 12, 111,...). This also shows how the terms can be obtained from the binary numbers A007088, cf. Arnold's first Example. - M. F. Hasler, Aug 29 2015

The 25th row is associated with the Quet number 162 = 2^1 * 3^3 * 5^1 so the exponents for the ordered prime signature form the vector (1,3,1). Following the method described in A108730 we subtract one from each cell yielding (0,2,0) which gives the number of zeros following each 1 in 11001 (the binary representation of the number 25).