Because both Ryan and I have high standards when it comes to benchmarking and overclocking. We don't run a script to run our benchmarks for us to save time and then walk away from the computer.

In terms of overclocking, in a bid to find truly stable overclocks literally hours of testing are needed. That isn't usually possible with launch-day reviews.

Assuming we ignore almost every other review you've ever done, I guess this would be true?

I'm not trying to be confrontational, but I find this pill hard to swallow when the 57/5800 series and all the 400 Fermis have OC results, and thats not even going back to previous 200 series or 47/4800 cards...

Were the cards in hand THAT much shorter then normal?

__________________
My Disclaimer to any advice or comment I make;

Quote:

Originally Posted by CroSsFiRe2009

I'm a self certified whizbang repair technician with 20 years of professional bullshit so I don't know what I'm talking about