Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act, 23073-23074 [2017-10208]

Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 96 / Friday, May 19, 2017 / Notices
Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Justice Information Services
Division.
Affected public who will be asked or
required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: City, county, state,
federal, and tribal law enforcement
agencies. Abstract: Under Title 28, U.S.
Code, Section 534, Acquisition,
Preservation, and Exchange of
Identification Records; Appointment of
Officials, June 11, 1930; Public Law
109–177 (H.R. 3199), March 9, 2006,
USA Patriot Improvement and
Reauthorization Act of 2005; Public Law
110–457, Title II, Section 237(a), (b),
December 23, 2008, the William
Wilberforce Trafficking Victims
Reauthorization Act of 2008, and
Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes
Prevention Act, April 28, 2009, this
collection requests Incident data from
city, county, state, tribal and federal law
enforcement agencies in order for the
FBI UCR Program to serve as the
national clearinghouse for the collection
and dissemination of crime data and to
publish these statistics in Crime in the
United States, Hate Crime Statistics, and
Law Enforcement Officers Killed and
Assaulted. NIBRS is an incident-based
reporting system in which law
enforcement collects data on each crime
occurrence. Designed to be generated as
a byproduct of local, state, and federal
automated records systems, currently,
the NIBRS collects data on each
incident and arrest within 24 crime
categories made up of 52 specific crimes
called Group A offenses. For each of the
offenses coming to the attention of law
enforcement, various facts about the
crime are collected. In addition to the
Group A offenses, there are 10 Group B
offense categories for which only arrest
data are reported. The most significant
difference between NIBRS and the
traditional Summary Reporting System
(SRS) is the degree of detail in reporting.
In reporting data via the traditional SRS,
law enforcement agencies tally the
occurrences of ten Part I crimes. NIBRS
is capable of producing more detailed,
accurate, and meaningful data because
data are collected about when and
where crime takes place, what form it
takes, and the characteristics of its
victims and perpetrators. Although most
of the general concepts for collecting,
scoring, and reporting UCR data in the
SRS apply in the NIBRS, such as
jurisdictional rules, there are some
important differences in the two
systems. The most notable differences
that give the NIBRS an advantage over
the SRS are: No Hierarchy Rule, in a
multiple-offense incident NIBRS reports
every offense occurring during the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 May 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
incident where SRS would report just
the most serious offense and the lowerlisted offense would not be reported;
NIBRS provides revised, expanded, and
new offense definitions; NIBRS provides
more specificity in reporting offenses,
using NIBRS offense and arrest data for
24 Group A offense categories can be
reported while in the SRS ten Part I
offenses can be reported; NIBRS can
distinguish between attempted and
completed Group A crimes; NIBRS also
provides crimes against society while
the SRS does not; the victim-to-offender
data, circumstance reporting, drug
related offenses, offenders suspected use
of drugs, and computer crime is
expanded in NIBRS; the NIBRS update
reports are directly tied to the original
incident submitted. The Group A
offense categories include arson, assault
offenses, bribery, burglary/breaking and
entering, counterfeiting/forgery,
destruction/damage/vandalism of
property, drug/narcotic offenses,
embezzlement, extortion/blackmail,
fraud offenses, gambling offenses,
homicide offenses, human trafficking,
kidnapping/abduction, larceny/theft
offenses, motor vehicle theft,
pornography/obscene material,
prostitution offenses, robbery, sex
offenses, sex offenses/nonforcible,
stolen property offenses, and weapon
law violations. The Group B offense
categories include bad checks, curfew/
loitering/vagrancy violations, disorderly
conduct, DUI, drunkenness, family
offenses/nonviolent, liquor law
violations, peeping tom, trespass of real
property, and all other offenses.
Beginning in 2019, the NIBRS will also
collect additional data values to capture
data on domestic violence, cargo theft,
and negligent manslaughter.
(4) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: There are approximately
6,648 law enforcement agencies. The
amount of time estimated for an average
respondent to respond is two hours
monthly which totals to an annual hour
burden of 24 hours. The 2 hours to
respond is the time it takes for the
agencies records management system
(RMS) to download the NIBRS and send
to the FBI. By design, law enforcement
agencies generate NIBRS data as a byproduct of their RMS. Therefore, a law
enforcement agency builds its system to
suit its own individual needs, including
all of the information required for
administration and operation; then
forwards only the data required by the
NIBRS to participate in the FBI UCR
Program.
(5) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23073
collection: There are approximately
159,552 hours, annual burden,
associated with this information
collection. The total number of
respondents is 6,648 with a total annual
hour burden of 24 hours, (6,648 × 24 =
159,552 total annual hours). If
additional information is required
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Suite 3E.405B,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: May 16, 2017.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2017–10236 Filed 5–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On May 15, 2017, the Department of
Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Minnesota in
the lawsuit entitled United States and
Minnesota v. Mesabi Nugget Delaware,
LLC, Civil Action No. 0:17-cv-01606–
RHK.
The United States and Minnesota
filed this Complaint asserting 15 claims
under the Clean Air Act against Mesabi
Nugget Delaware, LLC, an iron nugget
producer that owns and operates a plant
located near Hoyt Lakes, Minnesota.
The Complaint alleges violations of
various emissions limits for mercury,
particulate matter, and other pollutants
as set forth in Mesabi Nugget’s Title V
Permit. Under the proposed Consent
Decree, Mesabi Nugget will pay
$150,000 as a civil penalty and agrees,
prior to restarting the currently idled
facility, to implement various measures
to improve its monitoring and control of
emissions and to comply with interim
emission limits while working with the
State to refine certain emission limits.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Consent Decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division and should refer to
United States and Minnesota v. Mesabi
Nugget Delaware, LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90–
5–2–1–10952. All comments must be
submitted no later than 30 days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
23074
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 96 / Friday, May 19, 2017 / Notices
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department Web site: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
Consent Decree upon written request
and payment of reproduction costs.
Please mail your request and payment
to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $18.00 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Randall M. Stone,
Acting Assistant Section Chief,
Environmental Enforcement Section,
Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2017–10208 Filed 5–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1110–0004]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection;
eComments Requested; Number of
Full-Time Law Enforcement Employees
as of October 31
Department of Justice (DOJ),
Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Justice Information Services
Division will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register
allowing for a 60 day comment period.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for an additional 30
days until June 19, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to Ms. Amy Blasher,
Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 May 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Overview of This Information
Collection
Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
Investigation, CJIS Division, Module E–
3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg,
West Virginia 26306; facsimile (304)
625–3566. Written comments and/or
suggestions can also be sent to the
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention Department of Justice
Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or
sent to
OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov.
(1) Type of information collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the form/collection:
Number of Full-Time Law Enforcement
Employees as of October 31.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Agency form number: 1–711.
Sponsoring component: Department of
Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Justice Information Services
Division.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: City, county, state,
federal, and tribal law enforcement
agencies. Abstract: Under Title 28, U.S.
Code, Section 534, Acquisition,
Preservation, and Exchange of
Identification Records; and
Appointment of Officials, 1930, this
collection requests the number of arson
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
form city, county, state, tribal, and
federal law enforcement agencies in
order for the FBI UCR Program to serve
as the national clearinghouse for the
collection and dissemination of police
employee data and to publish these
statistics in Crime in the United States.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: There are approximately
18,439 law enforcement agency
respondents that submit once a year for
a total of 18,439 responses with an
estimated response time of 8 minutes
per response.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated 2,459
hours, annual burden, associated with
this information collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Suite 3E.405B,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: May 16, 2016.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2017–10145 Filed 5–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; State
Exchange on Employment and
Disability Initiative Evaluation
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Labor
(DOL) is submitting the Office of
Disability Employment Policy (ODEP)
sponsored information collection
request (ICR) proposal titled, ‘‘State
Exchange on Employment and
Disability Initiative Evaluation,’’ to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval for use
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. Public
comments on the ICR are invited.
DATES: The OMB will consider all
written comments that agency receives
on or before June 19, 2017.
ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with
applicable supporting documentation;
including a description of the likely
respondents, proposed frequency of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 96 (Friday, May 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23073-23074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10208]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On May 15, 2017, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed
Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the District
of Minnesota in the lawsuit entitled United States and Minnesota v.
Mesabi Nugget Delaware, LLC, Civil Action No. 0:17-cv-01606-RHK.
The United States and Minnesota filed this Complaint asserting 15
claims under the Clean Air Act against Mesabi Nugget Delaware, LLC, an
iron nugget producer that owns and operates a plant located near Hoyt
Lakes, Minnesota. The Complaint alleges violations of various emissions
limits for mercury, particulate matter, and other pollutants as set
forth in Mesabi Nugget's Title V Permit. Under the proposed Consent
Decree, Mesabi Nugget will pay $150,000 as a civil penalty and agrees,
prior to restarting the currently idled facility, to implement various
measures to improve its monitoring and control of emissions and to
comply with interim emission limits while working with the State to
refine certain emission limits.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on
the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division and should
refer to United States and Minnesota v. Mesabi Nugget Delaware, LLC,
D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-2-1-10952. All comments must be submitted no later
than 30 days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be
submitted either by email or by mail:
[[Page 23074]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To submit comments: Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................ pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.
By mail............................. Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be
examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of
the Consent Decree upon written request and payment of reproduction
costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library,
U.S. DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
Please enclose a check or money order for $18.00 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury.
Randall M. Stone,
Acting Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section,
Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-10208 Filed 5-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P