There are many many lunar rover designs on the internet many of them designed in mechatronics competitions. So to speed up the design process we
should find the best and most practical lunar rover design that has won the most completions, analyze it, then build it.

The most difficult part of the moon tower mission is not the rover, rather getting the rover to moon in working order will be the most challenging. --
We should do some online research on lunar missions.

We can learn from the 50 years of rover experience, we can determine what works and what doesn't. We can also look at how successful lunar rovers are
designed.

It would be ideal if we could obtain the schematics of these rovers to help us design moon tower rovers, though we can improve their performance
significantly with modern electronics. In any case we can reverse-engineer the rovers from the photographs, and fill in the details with radio
communications devices from the ARRL and RC electronics and/or mechatronics. We might also have to fill in details regarding thermal, pressure, and
temperature effects on materials - this is why the books listed in the previous post are helpful.

Next time I'll present research on how the United States and the Russian space agencies got the rovers on the moon. I'll see if I can find the
details.

The technical reports server contains technical information about many of NASA's missions. This is perfect because we can search for reports about
every detail of lunar missions. I found the technical report for a low cost lunar lander:

Though I don't believe all photographs indicate the presence of artificial structures, some images do show indications of artificial structures. His
book has lists of potential artificial structures on the moon, along with Latitude and Longitude coordinates.

I will be posting coordinates, so we can explore the moon before and after March 19 to search for potential landing sites.

Website 2: Type in the coordinates 68 latitude, 168 longitude, into the "Show Point from Latitude - Longitude" box (same as the coordinates from the
image in website 1) zoom in one click up, look a little to the Right, see it, hmm looks awfully familiar! Huge triangular anomaly in both photos from
different missions, with different equipment??

Tomorrow is the "supermoon", this will be an ideal time to view the moon with a good telescope, weather permitting. Before we begin it may be a good
idea to review the concept of "transient lunar phenomena":

Changes on the moon's surface has been observed for hundreds if not thousands of years, many of the these changes cannot be reproduced or explained
as natural phenomena:

There have been reports of changes on the moon taking place over a matter of days, that most likely cannot be explained by natural phenomena.

Interesting as these phenomena may be, they cannot give conclusive evidence of ET activity on the moon, since it could be explained as pareidolia,
telescope issues, outgassing, lighting conditions, etc. The only real way to obtain conclusive proof is by sending a rover.

Some of these Ham operators may still be alive, and some may even have recorded the conversation, so maybe we can go find these Ham operators and
determine if what this website says is accurate!! Heck we may even obtain copies of their recordings!!

but you may need a larger antenna to decode the signal at a high enough data rate, and more specific information about the LRO antennas.

So, If we can design and build the proper antenna, we may be able to obtain raw (as in received and decoded by our own equipment) data from the LRO!!
This is one way to determine if the NASA data is accurate, and possibly see moon anomalies!!

I believe it may be impossible if not very difficult to get accurate disclosure of human-ET interactions from many earthly governments. In a world
where secrecy is possible, you can never be sure that you are getting the truth. Any "disclosure" will always be tainted with suspicion that
governments are not completely accurate and in some cases are completely dishonest. SO, by building and launching these space probes you can get your
own disclosure.

Maybe we should not just limit ourselves to the moon, there may be artificial structures on other planets as well. It may be a good idea to construct
many space probes and space rovers and "flood" the solar system with robust probes.

These probes can be designed to survive under a variety of conditions and programmed to automatically detect when it is approaching a body and land on
it. The probes should be designed to be durable enough so that if it does find some artificial structures, it can wait around for a sufficient period
of time such that it will have a good probability of observing whoever or whatever may still be using those artificial structures. More importantly,
if we are extremely lucky, not only will the probe observe the alien spacecraft, we may be able to maneuver the rover near to and possibly onto an
alien spacecraft!!! We might get a glimpse of areas of the universe that no human has ever seen, as far as we know.

It may also be a good idea to design the probes so that they can communicate with each other and set up ad-hoc networks. This way probes can
communicate to earth even if it isn't in the line of sight, also it makes communication with the probes more robust, since we can communicate with
them through multiple channels.

It is critical that many people around the world launch probes, at different times. What we are counting on is that by the sheer number of probes it
will be very difficult for skeptics to deny the existence of the potential moon towers when almost anyone can design and build their own probe and see
the potential moon towers for themselves. Also, it will be very difficult for people to hoax videos when you can view the moon directly using your own
probe, with your own antennas and equipment.

Just imagine hundreds of probes exploring the potential moon towers, hundreds of probes exploring other planets for artificial
structures!!

Each day more and more evidence reinforces the idea that there may be alien objects on the moon.

Using a cutting edge technique that was discovered only 26 years ago and made public only about 12 years ago, I was able to extract NEW evidence for
the existence of ET from old data sources. I will present that in my next posting.

People can use there programs to view moon images, as well as zoom in, enlarge, sharpen, enhance, etc images.

Some images, especially if you download them from the Planetary Image Atlas from JPL, may be nonstandard formats. For example I downloaded an image
from the Planetary Image Atlas, in the .img format. Some image viewers might be able to successfully open the .img format, but many might not. So
people may have to use a piece of software named NASAVIEW:

I think I found the last piece of the puzzle, I realized that we needed software to simulate in detail the space mission to the moon. I was looking
for something that could model the behavior of the moon probe as it makes it's way to the moon and how it will behave as it lands near the moon
towers, here it is:

Time to set up a good telescope and view what appear to be "moon towers". Everyday the evidence for moon towers grows stronger, now its time to build
the moon probes and take a close look at what appear to be moon towers.

I'm working on presenting the new method to extract evidence, it takes a bit of work to present it correctly, it is highly dependent on multimedia.

Reverse speech is a technology that quite literally allows one to determine what someone is thinking, with nothing more than an audio recorder.
Reversals, as Mr. Oates calls them, occur in regular everyday speech, the more emotional and more unguarded the more reversals. People can test this
for themselves all one has to do is simply record oneself for an extended period of time and then listen to it in reverse, every once in a while you
will hear some words or phrases very clearly, and much of the time you will clearly agree that you where thinking that during that portion of the
recording.

What I find amazing is that little babies from as young as 4 months old, even before the learn to talk forwards, apparently can have clear
reversals!!

Now people may think this is just a form of Pareidolia, but if strict guidelines are observed, one can obtain real substantive information about what
another person is thinking:

Well, how does this relate to moon towers? We can apply reverse speech to the multitude of interviews, radio shows, audio recordings of astronauts,
former NASA employees, current NASA employees, people who claim to have seen a UFO, the list is endless. We can determine whether they are telling the
truth or not. Logically speaking Reverse Speech cannot determine if they are telling the truth, but they can reveal if people are telling lies.

Here are some of my own reversals:

Back around 1968 the Apollo 8 mission flew around the moon, one of the astronauts said "Roger, please be informed there is a Santa Claus", this little
phrase has fascinated UFO enthusiasts for nearly 50 years, why would an astronaut mention Santa Claus? Well I performed a reverse speech analysis and
one can clearly hear "no aliens with her, no big deal", so during this portion of the trip no aliens where seen, the phrase "aliens with her" may
refer to the moon.

Now an even more juicy reversal comes from former NASA employee Donna Hare:

When I performed a reverse speech analysis one can clearly hear "anything else with it, UFO's uses it". This reversal occurred when she was talking
about how NASA airbrushes UFO's out of photographs before selling them to the public.

Now for even more juice, the head honcho himself John David Oates performed a reverse speech analysis of the conference given by Col John Hayes to
present the Air Force's version of the Roswell incident:

Many of the reversals indicate that the Air Force may not be giving us the whole story.

It may be advisable to be careful with Reverse Speech because you get to hear what people REALLY think. It is uncensored, unedited, raw, and sometimes
shocking, Mr. Oates has even stated that some married couples actually divorced after hearing reverse speech analysis of each other.

Playing Jake Gyllenhall from source code, or Mulder from X-files is stressful and tiring. I don't want to sound paranoid, but earthly powers are at
work and they are getting a little too close for comfort, I've got a day job to protect.

I am going to slow down the moon tower mission just a bit, the postings may come less frequent, but they will come I assure you.

Audacity is Freeware and it can record audio and save it to an mp3 file, it can record ANY sound played through your computer soundcard, though you
may have to change some control panel settings on your computer:

It has many useful features, the feature we will use is the "reverse" feature under the "Effect" menu. But first, just how do we record audio using
audacity, How do we find the audio?

There are many sources of audio, one of the easiest is Youtube. Youtube has many videos of interviews with Astronauts, audio from actual Apollo
missions, etc. So simply go to youtube and find a video that you believe will yield useful reversals.

Another good source of audio are DVD documentaries about the Apollo Missions, Online News Broadcasts, Radio shows, Websites, almost anything that
records audio can be used.

The question then becomes how can we record audio from youtube videos? Well if you read through and tested the "using the control panel" webpage above
then, simply start up Audacity, start playing the youtube video and simply press record on Audacity and it should start recording the audio. Save the
audio to an Mp3 file and begin the reverse speech analysis.

To reverse the entire audio track simply go to edit--->select----->all, then go to the Effects menu and click on "Reverse" and voila the entire audio
track is reversed.

Simply press play and the entire reversed audio track should start playing, you will have to listen closely because much of the audio is
unintelligible, but every once in a while you will hear a clear reversal, giving you insight into what people are actually thinking!!

I'm coming up with more and more ideas everyday, so be on the lookout!!

In this report, we will explore the mass of the moon. The reason why is that some of the moon anomaly enthusiasts have claimed that the mass of the
moon as reported by NASA is incorrect due to apparent discrepancies in calculation of the neutral point between the moon and the earth. In this regard
I agree with NASA, if we are looking for the truth then we must admit it even when it hurts the case for moon anomalies.

The basic premise for questioning the currently accepted mass of the moon stems from a July 1969 Time article discussing the then recent Apollo
mission to the moon:

If you perform a search for 43,495 and read the sentence you will see that at 43,495 miles from the moon, the force of gravity of the earth and moon
were equal and the space capsule began to "fall" towards the moon. Now we can use this information to calculate the mass of the moon by using Newton's
laws to the space capsule:

The "official" mass of the moon is 7.36 x 10^22 kg. The reason why this is a big deal, is because the escape velocity of a planet with a mass of 1.33
x 10^24 kg is high enough so that most of the molecules that could make up a breathable atmosphere would not have enough time to escape:

We must remember that F = (GM1m2)/ (r^2) is a VECTOR relationship not just a scalar relationship, the above derivation assumed a straight line
trajectory between the earth and the moon, also it ignored the motion of the earth relative to the moon which will change all the distances.

The correct way to calculate "neutral points" for the earth-moon system is more complicated:

Not to mention that the mass of the moon could be calculated without reference to "Lagrange Points" or NASA or Space Capsules, in fact the mass of
the moon has been calculated before the 20th century!!.

For example here is a calculation of the mass of the moon in a physics textbook from 1850!!:

Next time we will explore some of the best evidence for moon bases and some possible reasons why the US government may be so against disclosure. Some
of the ideas I present may have staggering implications, lets just say if the ideas are true will completely change our view of the world.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.