I know there was a UFC fight tonight, I didn't know it was on Foxnews, Joan Walsh gets blasted after she said people like Bill were creating the atmosphere for the violence that we've seen on the news. This really got heated,... I'm surprised she went on....

I don’t always care for Bill, but he took her to the mat. Her only answer was the procedure was legal. Lots of things are legal, but that doesn’t make them morally right. I’m looking forward to reading the next issue of Salon.

Ditto that Darkwolf, I think O’Reilly has recently said some dumb things about FR, but MSNBC has been trying so very hard to link the violence on the news to talkradio and anyone on the right, they are really shameless...

Today on Hardball, Sarah Palin’s benign comments about the government were highlighted by Chris Matthews as inciting hate..

The Left have no reason to change their way of dealing with the Right--demonize, instantly, constantly. From Reagan on (I was a kid before him, so can't speak to those times from personal observation), the Left have said everything and anything about the Right, and it was always their right to do so. When the Right says controversial things, though, it's time to pause and reconsider the right to say "anything." It really is amazing how they manage to stay on message with this consistency, but when you consider that Leftism is a kind of religious cult, it becomes a little clearer.

Lefties like this woman and Garafalo and Olberman seem like cultists to me, and I have worked with people with mental incapacity, so I know of what I speak.

In one case, a money-hungry abortionist was murdered by a radical abortion foe. Even though pro-lifers denounced the killing, the media blamed it on them.

In the second case, a soldier was shot by a Muslim opponent of our involvement in Iraq & Afghanistan. This got less media attention than the murder of the abortionist, and there was zero effort to blame all liberals or all Iraq War opponents or anti-war commentators such as Olbermann & Schultz for the killing.

In the third case, a security guard was murdered when an aged loon shot up the Holocaust Museum. This got a ton of coverage, just like the abortionist killing, but unlike the soldier killing. The nutcase killer holds a variety of views. He hates both Obama & Bush. He hates Jews, but also hates Christianity. He's a 9/11 “truther”. He's a registered Democrat. But somehow the media are calling him “right-wing” and blaming his rampage on conservative commentators, none of whom share the beliefs which apparently motivated his violence.

Obviously an organized effort is underway to demonize conservative dissent in America with outright lies and smear tactics, and selective reporting.

All I want is a Constitutional Amendment that says I have the same freedom of speech as liberal/commie/Alinskyites do.

White trash can’t use the ‘N’ word, but nothing wrong when black trash so-called rap’artists’ use it; and liberal elitists can call anyone they want the ‘N’ word (or anything else for that matter) - when the ‘N’ stands for Nazi.

This country needs a Constitutional Amendment outlawing Political Correctness and Hate Speech/Crime laws.

We do have the right to use those words. We need people with the backbone to use them when they are appropriate and not back down and apologize.

Leave the "new constitutional conventions" to the libs. We need to exercise our freedoms, and not allow THEM to set the agenda and decide what is "OK" speech and what isn't. We're no better than the libs if we start fine-tuning the rules when the rules are on our side already.

Her only answer was the procedure was legal. Lots of things are legal, but that doesnt make them morally right. Im looking forward to reading the next issue of Salon.It is totally amazing how liberal (progressive) (socialists) (etc) hide behind the phrase - It is legal or It isn't against the law - and never say ANYTHING about what is right or wrong.

To them there is nothing that is wrong as long as they can do what they want, where they want and to whom they want. To them the life of another is nothing. It is THEIR life that is so all mighty important.

20
posted on 06/13/2009 2:42:44 AM PDT
by jongaltsr
(Hope to See ya in Galt's Gulch.)

What I believe it consists of is a misleading and false defense mechanism she has constructed for her public image and for own conscience.

By defining herself as a "Pro-Choice Catholic" - she can try to dig her fingernails into some modicum of Christian morality and authority, without ever really following God's word, Christ, or the teachings of the Catholic Church.

She also lost by 1) not answering the questions asked, as typical of liberals of her ilk, and 2) by justifying the murder/killing of nearly 42 million worldwide and 1.37 million in the US because it is “legal”.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.