>
> I would appreciate any insight on this issue.
The same answer applies. If this were a known and common fact, it would
have already been fixed. A report stating "slapd SIGSEGVs" is little more
than garbage, without the ancillary info detailed in
<http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/56.html>. All I (and, I suspect,
anyone else reading your message) can infer is that chances are there is
some error in some portion of code, not necessarily in OpenLDAP's.
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
Responsabile Open Solution
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.n.c.
Via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
------------------------------------------
Office: +39.02.23998309
Mobile: +39.333.4963172
Email: pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it
------------------------------------------