tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-59388441009693842492018-03-05T08:13:17.363-08:00The Political ShamanThis blog is on politics and concerns in society, with the purpose to disparage through logic and facts any kind of liberal, socialist, communist, marxist, theocratic and idiotic political and social ideas. We can save ourselves from the onslaught of continued old world socialism and culture if the ideas that created America exist in the minds of enough people.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.comBlogger84125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-26015913763484923592014-02-03T23:20:00.001-08:002014-02-03T23:20:14.922-08:00Continuing the Prediction of the Great Recession caused by Barack Obama following FDR economicsIn a previous post I predicted the recession started by the democrats just before Obama was elected would be turned into a decade long recession precisely because Obama was following the same economic plan the FDR and those democrats used during the Depression.&nbsp;<div><br /></div><div>The easy way to predict it is why would doing that type of economics have a different result. FDR turned a recession into a Depression and the same thing happened with Obama.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>From the perspective of the individual free people of the world it was an epic failure. Recession, high unemployment, even higher government caused inflation and everyone knows what happened and is happening.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>From the perspective of the Democrat party it was a success. Also posted previously, FDR and the democrats did not want to "fix" the recession of their time, they wanted the misery and destitution to become worse so they could impose their form of Marxism. Yes that is what it is. The massive socialist welfare programs of FDR, Plank 2, the Progressive and graduated tax went from existing under Wilson, to Heavy taxes as Marx envisioned, all under FDR. Direct access to peoples money through these taxes and the concepts of withholding because as FDR's treasury secretary said, people wont complain about taxes they pay if they never see the money in the first place. The FDR economics of the great depression from the perspective of Democrats imposing tyranny in the form of marxism to enrich themselves and increase their power, a total success.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>Obama has done the same thing. By creating more misery extended now for 8 years, Obama and the democrats imposed even more of that marxist socialism. They have imposed Obamacare, created conditions were 100 million people are working and supporting all the rest of the population, parasites like welfare recipients, government employees, bureaucrats, special interest, public employee unions and many other members of the government class and their cronies.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>A minority of people are paying for everything, a new slave class which is forced to work and pay for the existence of a parasite majority. All achieved through socialism and FDR economic the 2nd time succeeded in imposing it all.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>Now &nbsp;the prediction. FDR did have some appearance of recovery up until 1936. In fact the economy reached pre 1929 levels, then it fell again. The reason is the massive socialist programs from Social Security and other Welfare started then or their economy crushing effects started to manifest in 1937. This second recession of the depression was directly caused by the effects of FDR economics and implementation of some socialist programs.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>Obama following FDR economics will have the same exact effect. Obama's massive Obamacare has kicked in. The effects of over spending, government caused inflation and the rest of the FDR economics mixed with the fact the economy has not gone above pre-2006 levels but it is up. The second crash should arrive in 2014.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>FDR economics is a failure. The entire concept of the government confiscating money and spending it on special interest has never worked. It has a very obvious path of at least a decade of recession, with one major secondary crash.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>Lets just hope Obama doesn't try to start a world war because it was a war that finally ended the depression, it was not FDR and his economics.</div>The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-72905737056875508502012-03-20T23:12:00.001-07:002012-03-20T23:14:22.909-07:00I don't fear the government, I fear the individuals who can't see they follow socialism<h6 class="uiStreamMessage" ft="{&quot;type&quot;:1}"><span class="messageBody" ft="{&quot;type&quot;:3}">"I can see that discussing economics with you will be like discussing evolution with a creationist. You won’t let facts and evidence get in the way of your beliefs.<br />Problem is, the facts don’t go away just because you ignore them. If you want to claim wikipedia is wrong, you must know there are other sources right? And you must have figured out that tax rates in the last couple of hundred years are known right? So why deny what is easily searchable?<br /><br />And I already told you, unlike you, I am a capitalist. You’re a day dreamer." - Insane Liberal<br /><br /> Wow friend, you are the one who seems to have beliefs in a government managed economy that has failed. Try reading real history. Start with the debate between Patrick Henry and James Madison over the ratification of the Constitution. Patrick Henry feared the Constitution would create the over bearing tyrannical type central government we have today. He even describes it and it sounds like what we have today as evolved from the 1930s. Madison states there are two protections to prevent it, the Federal Government banned from direct taxation and the State legislatures voting their Senators. The reason for the latter was to ensure one house remained unaffected by popular actions/mob rule and the former was to ensure the Feds never could get enough money to be a tyranny. Both protections were removed just before 1920 and by the 30s the effects of that loss of protection took hold. In other letters you will find Madison describing how Feds take over. Starting with creating public schools, then the curriculum, taking over postal services, roads and he says eventually the feds will follow that path to take over everything for a variety of benevolent reasons.<br /><br />Your nonsense is what we live today. In the 1930s a series of laws were passed to "prevent" the supposed crimes of the 1920s and to "protect" the people from risk of all types. Since crime cant ever be prevented and the definition of what an individual considers a base sort of living cant be defined, this task is as impossible as socialist desires for equal results for all.<br /><br />When the original laws dont work because they do not prevent the excesses of the politicians and others who really committed the crimes or mistakes, they instead attack the innocent and free, the government adds more laws. As politicians, rich friends and their sycophants do everything the can to get around these laws, including exempting themselves from them(as in today with the politicians exemption on insider trading) these actions to get around the laws eventually cause more problems, making the people upset and yet more laws are passed to prevent the crimes caused by the actions of the 4th, 3rd, 2nd and 1st sets of laws either ignored or considered not strong enough. So now today we have 2006, the politicians scamming everyone left and right, insider trading, crazy laws to allow for the existence of nonsense like trading derivatives on unrealized capital, crony capitalism that takes tax or borrowed money to put in companies, the democrats in congress kill an economy, take over damage it even more and then come out with even more laws like obamacare, dodd frank, sarbox and heck lets pull in other insanity like the patriot act and its effects and we have what we have today. All of this because the protections Madison described were removed allowing FDR to step in and basically create what we have today because the state were and still are defenseless against the feds and the people also defenseless because individually can't ever defend their money and property from the feds.<br /><br /> It is you Sir who needs to look at history and see what is really there. Taking on more and more and more regulation after regulation after regulation in the name of preventing crime or preventing risk has the exact opposite effect. It is no better than a doctor prescribing a pill for an unknown disease, the prescribing 40 more pills to counteract the side effects of all other pills.<br /><br />I do not fear the government, I fear people like you who read the Declaration of Independance, see the words Unalienable Rights and the 3 rights of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness which encompass all rights an individual can define for himself and are in fact unalienable, then you believe that the government we have today with its insane taxation, even more insane spending and so many regulations on you that you are likely breaking a dozen fed, state or local laws at any moment because those laws demand everything from your money, to what is acceptable to read, if you are allowed to work or not, what lights you can have and likely which hand you can masturbate with. Yeah maybe that is a joke but considering there are laws on the books going back a couple centuries that have many crazy ones, you really can't say which hand is legal to use. You and I both are right this second breaking a law, unknowingly and you thing I am the one not paying attention or reading history? It is people like you we should all fear, you actually believe your progressive socialist insanity and you don't even know that it is the path you are following.</span></h6>The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-85375641070138530772011-11-18T01:30:00.000-08:002011-11-18T01:46:50.816-08:00American Exceptionalism the concept of unalienable rightshttp://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2011/07/faith-and-freedom<br /><br />Newt Gingrich and the author of the Economist article are both incorrect about what creates American exceptionalism. The author of the article is of course disparaging Gingrich because the Author is a liberal and he is expected to attack republicans wherever possible.<br /><br />It would have been more effective to disparage Gingrich for dragging in God to what is otherwise the correct answer about American exceptionalism.<br /><h6 class="uiStreamMessage" ft="{&quot;type&quot;:1}"><span class="messageBody" ft="{&quot;type&quot;:3}"> It is 100% correct to conclude American Exceptionalism comes from Americans understanding we are endowed with individual unalienable rights. It has nothing at all to do with God. The world creator was chosen to encompass any concept, idea or myth about <span class="text_exposed_show">the individuals existence to merely put forth the understanding that you existing is why you have those rights.<br /><br />What needed to be explained better by Gingrich is ALL rights an individual can imagine are his unalienable rights. The Right to Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness really do define any right possible and ensure it is not possible to define a right that would deny the same to all other individuals.<br /><br />The individual on his own or in cooperation with others now can become exceptional, once the individual realizes he is the owner of his rights as well as the one who defines his rights along with the most important concept of the rights being unalienable, the individual is not even able to voluntarily give up his rights, let alone have them taken.<br /><br />The Federal government or more specifically the liberals, progressives and religious conservatives do not understand the true concept of owning ALL unalienable rights by the individual. Evidence for this lack of understanding is the incorrect Supreme Court ruling that created the unconstitutional concept of Privilege. Rights defined by the individual and unalienable are never a privilege. The government has no authority to create or grant rights and it has no authority to alienate an individual from his rights and that includes declaring rights privileges. Another example of this is the entire socialist/liberal varieties of welfare. A person has the right to his life and pursuit of happiness, which includes the property and wealth he creates. There is no condition available to alienate an individual from the right to the fruits of his labors in the name of giving it to others. Gay marriage is another example. The right to happiness in life and the freedom to pursue what makes an individual happy is entirely defined by the individual, which would include who this individual associates with and the definition of that relationship. There is no authority in the concept of unalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that allows the government or a society to define the types of acceptable relationships for happiness to be pursued.<br /><br />What makes America exceptional is the fact that all rights are owned by the individual upon his existence and are unalienable. Knowing you can define your own rights, which includes by default defining and owning your entire existence plus doing as you will with your existence, including keeping what you produce is what allows America to be the best country in the world.<br /><br />It has nothing at all to do with God. Even if God could be proven to exist as the sole grantor of rights, the fact that God is unable to take those unalienable rights away is what makes those rights only part of the individual.<br /><br />Gingrich is wrong to make it appear as if God is the arbiter of rights. The reason it is a mistake is both a lack of understanding the declaration's words correctly but also this God sourced rights concept creates a false condition of control over rights outside the individual. Meaning God, or more specifically, priests, ministers and imams who claim to speak for god, will being to determine your rights based on bibles, korans or their own delusions and use those same sources to alienate rights as well. It is the same effect we have now with the various American governments believing they have authority to alienate the individual from his rights. The more dangerous outcome of this is eventually the secular and theocratic political class will begin to grants its own class "rights" to itself that contradict or even attempt to alienate the individual from his rights, including life. Effectively the political class will create its own group rights which do not have the natural control individual unalienable rights have. The control is the individual is unable to grant himself a right that alienates others from their own rights. The political class granted rights have no natural protection from this dangerous concept.<br /><br />Still Gingrich at least understands we do have unalienable rights, which is significantly better than the liberals in the democrat party who believe the individual has no rights at all beyond what they grant to the collective.</span></span></h6>The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-32945893309204797152011-07-10T22:47:00.000-07:002011-07-10T23:17:52.695-07:00The Founders wanted the states to have to Compete for population and be a check on Federal PowerIn this previous post, The Political Shaman described how the loss of the protections we the people had to prevent the federal government from becoming tyrannical. One additional benefit to this is ensuring states compete for population, which is a benefit to the people. <br /><br />http://thepoliticalshaman.blogspot.com/2009/01/how-democrats-removed-protections.html<br /><br />The post describes the protections Madison said protected us. Specifically they are the Senate elected by state legislature and the feds Barred from all forms of direct taxation of the people.<br /><br />The reason for both are simple. Senators having to answer to states for federal costs is easier for the people to control. Our impact on the state legislature is for more direct than a federal senator. Madison said specifically one part of congress needs to be protected from mob rule, which was supposed to be the senate.<br /><br />The second part is the money. In effect, Madison said without the money, the Feds can't become tyrants. It costs a lot of resources to oppress people. Also, the states governments, who the feds were to bill for most expenses and the Corporations, who the feds could tax are in a much better position to fight off Federal abuses and encroachment on the rights of the individual.<br /><br />Had the amendments passed in 1913 failed to be ratified, NONE of the socialism, over taxation, regulation or anything else insane the feds do today would have happened. At least at the federal level, which is the point of this post.<br /><br />The right of the individual person to define his own rights and have them protected by the Federal Government is the sole reason for the Federal Government to exist. That is the only mandate. Anything that gets in the way of an <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Individual's</span> freedom, <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">property</span>, life and self defined happiness is wrong and against the constitution.<br /><br />However, Nothing bars a state government from imposing welfare, insane taxation, regulation or anything else. The Feds are supposed to ensure no state gets out of control. BUT if each state was in fact operating under the original constitution of the United States in regards to taxation, welfare and other programs, then each state is an automatic check on all others.<br /><br />The concept here is each state would pass laws that would be designed to provide whatever the people of that state desired. If for example, the people of New York want to continue to buy into the socialist utopia, then they are free to tax themselves to oblivion in the name of free <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">healthcare</span>, government handouts or whatever else they think a socialist utopia can provide. At the same time a different state, such as Texas, might have no socialism at all and instead have it be every man is free to earn all the money they want and take care of themselves and anyone they freely choose.<br /><br />The people of <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">America</span> would then move to which ever of the 50 states provided the best combinations of freedom, social programs, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">healthcare</span>, regulation or whatever. The check or protection is each state could not get too out of control for fear of losing population. The bottom line is any individual would have 50 different choices to move to and live in the type of state that best suits the individual.<br /><br />With the Federal Government controlling everything and imposing its undesired will on all, we have no choice. All 50 states are in effect the same. The slight differences in taxation or services is just that slight and not really enough to make much of a difference. Really, the 5% income tax in Illinois, compared to Zero in Texas or 10% in California. Who cares, the Feds are taking at a minimum 15% from everyone working in Payroll(no the employer part is in fact yours, FDR made this an illusion) for anyone who hits the lowest tax bracket, you are now at 25% and it goes up. So 5% differences at the state level mean very little.<br /><br />Remember, Madison was against all of this tyrannical behavior. He knew then that the people individually would never have the ability to fight of an over reaching federal government. The Corporations and States do have the ability to defend the people from the Federal Government. As of 1913, the Feds are enjoying unchecked power and it will never change as long as they can directly take your property with impunity.<br /><br />All states are in effect the same and have no ability to stop the Federal Government. The only real option an American has is to leave America entirely for any country that does not tax the hell out of productive members of the society. Since this is not really a good option, lets propose eliminating the 16<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">th</span> and 17<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">th</span> amendments, so we can again have states that are a check on the Federal Government. States free and able to tax whatever they feel their people want to pay for and compete against each other for population to ensure no state is over doing anything. Relegating the Feds back to their mandate of ensuring standardized commerce, justice, security, foreign policy and protecting the Individual rights of the people. Sure the Feds have a few more useful responsibilities but none of them would include education, welfare, housing, what toilet I can buy or even how much money I can carry around in my pocket.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-62513623194428369572011-04-14T12:17:00.000-07:002011-04-14T12:18:29.242-07:00How is it right for people who live off of welfare to be granted the authority over those who earn that money?<div class="mbl notesBlogText clearfix"><div><p>I am starting to see why the original constitution only affirmed voting rights to land owners. Not for any reason other than the insanity it is to let people who would live off welfare be granted a majority vote to allow them to steal their welfare money from the people who earned that money or prevent politicians from stealing wealth from producers to purchase the votes from recipients of the pillaging. Both conditions are what we have today.</p><p> </p><p>Whatever happened to the right to your own freedom and life? When did the unalienable rights of free people get taken away by those unwilling to exercise their own freedom to live?</p></div></div>The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-32978677992559687812011-02-21T12:25:00.000-08:002011-02-21T12:38:37.294-08:00Forced Unionism - the Debate between right to work laws that prevent unions from forcing people to joinIt is shocking there is a debate about freedom vs a group declaring itself a union being able to force anyone to join or even be affected by their existence.<br /><br />The Declaration of Independence affirmed all men because of they exist have the right to life, liberty and pursuing happiness. Freedom is the most basic of natural rights affirmed and protected by the constitution. There should not have to be Right to Work laws to prevent unions from forced membership because the unions should not be able to force anyone to join them. In fact, the unions should not be able to compel an individual to acknowledge them or to vote for or against them. The right to work is inherent in the freedom declared in the Declaration of Independence.<br /><br />The validity of the unions is questioned when it has to use force to compel membership, threaten your employment if you do not comply with their demands and force these same victims to pay for it all. How is this different from any past or present theocracy that used force to compel membership in the religion. It has long been established that forcing an individual into a group, religion or tribe is a crime and the fact that Unions must use force to compel membership and compliance shows the union is in fact a fallacy.<br /><br />If a Union is legitimate it should be able to inspire membership through providing members with some kind of benefit the members feel is important or useful enough to pay for. Using force of government and threats of financial impact or even physical threats is nothing more than thugs using law to steal money and force victims to continue paying for it.<br /><br />A free individual has the right to work, has the right to collectively bargain and has the right to bargain with his employer on his own. Anything that takes away a citizens right to freedom is illegal and against the freedom this country was founded on.<br /><br /><br />http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/02/21/wisconsin-union-battle-set-stage-national-right-work-debate/The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-41512309934541807042011-02-14T13:33:00.000-08:002011-02-14T13:46:48.289-08:00The Government has no rights in the US ConstitutionThere are no rights in the Constitution for any person or entity. The people have unalienable rights that exist as soon as the individual exists, no government grants rights nor can a government remove them. Unalienable rights can't be taken or removed by any means. A person can't sign them away, give them up, nor can a group of people vote them away. God can't remove them any more than judgments from a supreme court. The individual defines what they are and no method exists to change rights into privileges to allow the Government to take it away.<br /><br />The US Federal Government has no rights at all. It has only obligations to defend the country, set up a means to resolve disputes and crimes, standardize certain aspects of commerce to facilitate the economy and above all protect the rights of each individual.<br /><br />No where in the Constitution does it declare a set of rights to the government. It has no RIGHT to your money, it has no right to tell you how to live, it has no right to dictate what you do with your life or your progeny.<br /><br />Today and for the last 100 years, the US Federal Government has assumed rights to itself at the expense of individual rights. Such as the "right" to tax the people directly, the "right" to dictate to states regulations like speed limits, environmental regulation of the people directly and the right to know anything and everything an individual does in life.<br /><br />The fact is the individual should be able to exist in America and have no interaction at all with the federal government beyond voting, juries and a census.<br /><br />America will recover and prosper as soon as we can reestablish individual and state rights and remove the false rights of the Federal Government.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-9551646730536111532011-02-14T13:21:00.000-08:002011-02-14T13:33:25.214-08:00The Original Fair Tax is still fairThe original constitution had a fair tax before the progressive liberals changed it.<br /><br />The Federal Government was explicitly barred from direct taxation of the people. They could only tax commerce and states with apportionment. This was done on purpose. Madison argued this was one of the two protections in the constitution to prevent the Federal Government from becoming a tyranny or some entity that governs by decree without any concern at all for the people.<br /><br />The reason Madison considered this a protection is because it takes money to have a tyranny. There would be no way for the Feds to steal enough money to become a tyranny, With the State governments in between the people and the Feds. The Progressives removed this just before 1920 and 90 years later we now have a Federal Government feared by Patrick Henry.<br /><br />So what is a fair tax? Simple, no tax at all from the federal level. Go back to the original tax code mentioned in the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Constitution</span> which specifically says the feds must effectively send a bill to the states and leave it up to each state on how to pay it. There is also argument supporting corporate taxation. Both are safer because it places at the hands of the people the power of state governments and big business to keep the Federal Spending in check.<br /><br />There is no way the President or Congress could deficit spend, ear mark spend or spend to the levels of today, if state governments were there to tell the feds to take a hike, every time they attempt to get out of control.<br /><br />Corporate taxes work because any of the larger companies have the resources to battle Uncle Sam to keep those taxes low.<br /><br />With the current tax system, the Feds are able to do what is done today, class warfare between income levels, bypass state governments with spending and no individual person is able to stop the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">government</span> from doing whatever it wants with each individuals money.<br /><br />There was a reason the Founding Fathers barred the Federal Government from most Tax sources, perhaps we should consider these reasons and protect ourselves by putting this protection back in force.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-21734574603944559432011-02-14T13:14:00.001-08:002011-02-14T13:21:34.900-08:00US Budget 3.7 Trillion and growing - America how much do you plan to let those parasites confiscate from you?The White House released a budget estimate today for 3.7 Trillion <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">USD</span>.<br />At no point does the President or any other politician give any indication they plan to stop this unsustainable spending binge they have been on for years.<br /><br />Calls for a balanced budget are pointless because all these calls demand a balanced budget primarily through increasing taxes to confiscate as much of the fruits of the labor of American citizens.<br /><br />How about demands the budget become balanced by the Politicians being forced to spend less than what they take in revenue. Simply removing political corruption and waste from incompetence could potentially achieve a 50% reduction in spending and fit withing the amount of revenue forcibly taken each year.<br /><br />Is it really such a complex concept to force politicians to spend as a normal person would, not waste our money and actually spend significantly less?The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-40125263098928062302011-02-14T12:55:00.000-08:002011-07-10T23:25:29.179-07:00Muslim tyrants fallEvents in Tunisia and Egypt with currently occurring protests in Algeria, Bahrain and Yemen to remove Muslim Tyrants all show the failure of the UN and progressive liberal policies of moral equivalency as justification to form any kind of diplomatic relationship with tyrants.<br /><br />The Policy of the progressive liberal in dealing with tyrants began in the 1930s with the League of Nations and the US as a policy of just letting tyrants do whatever atrocity they committed under the guise of internal politics. While Germany, Italy and Japan spent most of the 1930s, invading and occupying countries like Czech, Ethiopia and Korea the US and League under Neville Chamberlain simply believed these leaders like Hitler were benign people that just need to be understood and negotiated with while they are occupying nations and killing people.<br /><br />This policy transferred to the UN, this concept that all nations are equal in the UN regardless of the fact that many are tyrannies run by thugs and in many cases have religious leaders bent on killing every other person on the planet.<br /><br />The UN and US support these tyrants if they leave American interests alone. Past examples are US support of the Saddam to combat Iran, Mubarak, Saudi royals and others. The UN "peace keeping" efforts merely result in stalemates and refugee camps with occasional rape gangs as seen in <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Africa</span>.<br /><br />The UN is incapable of choosing the side of right and peace. Actions and places such as the occupation attempt of east <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Timor</span>, North Korea (a UN stalemate), Iran, Syria, Venezuela and many other countries are in no way <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">operating</span> under any kind of natural right or with consent of the people. The UN should be banning these countries from world commerce not negotiating with them. Mubarak should never existed, Iranian Ayatollahs should never have been in power just as Hitler should and could have been stopped years before he invaded Poland.<br /><br />The results are seen today. After years of these UN supported tyrannies oppressing their people, the people are finally rising up and throwing off the shackles of their oppressors. The UN and member nations can't even understand <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">what is happening. </span>To the UN, the people are just irrelevant plebeians who have no say, no individual rights or even any direct involvement in the world.<br /><br />The UN either needs to acknowledge the fact that all countries are not equal. Some Tyrants are in fact Tyrants and they are not legitimate just because their thugs confiscated some geographic space and enslaved the population.<br /><br />It is time to end the UN sponsored "peace" where civil wars, genocide, tyranny, rape and violence endures for decades with UN refugee camps and UN peace keeping forces ensure the status quo.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-33191566249585331702011-01-05T12:14:00.000-08:002011-01-05T12:15:24.625-08:00Cold in Florida and LA and it is more Proof of Human Caused Global Warming?You environmentalist morons would be amusing if you were not costing the world billions in unnecessary costs and regulation. The facts are there is no HUMAN caused global warming. Your religion was debunked and proven to be based on falsified information and so called computer models that are skewed to "prove" humans are causing global warming.<br /><br />The facts are CO2 has gone up AFTER the rise in temperature, just as it has for every warming period between ice ages going back a billion years.<br /><br />Myths of your ideology are there is no actual reason to accept some kind of "global" temperature or its meaning. WE humans do not know enough about the atmosphere to even guess what is happening and less than 100 years of temperature data from parts of America, Europe and a few other locations amounting to less than 1000th of a percent of all temperature on land, sea and in the air we would need to take to even begin to understand the biosphere we live in.<br /><br />The facts are you human caused warmists have chosen a nonexistent problem to to demonize and given it a cause called CO2 which conveniently can't be measured, we dont know what actually can be in the atmosphere and it will always be there as long as life exists. In effect a cause you can always state is still a cause and never have to worry about a solution.<br /><br />With a final problem with your religion. We cant falsify your claims, as long as every atmospheric phenomenon, earthquake and bird dropping is always a justification to claim global warming is a problem and is human caused. With everything that happens "proof" and no condition exists to falsify it, you people are just spouting a belief and ideology with no science to back it up.<br /><br />I suppose you morons will claim global warming is proven again when it is HOT in LA, a hurricane occurs in the atlantic, a volcano erupts on the sea floor, the caribou choose a migration path 30 ft north of last year past a fallen pine tree, the tarot cards come out in numeric order, hell freezes over, god smites the planet and the Obamanation continues another 4 years.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-28063158719694623772010-12-16T04:01:00.000-08:002010-12-16T04:02:50.891-08:00This makes sense. The Democrats want to stick it to millions of Americans in order to supposedly punish a few hundred "wealthy" peopleAs the title of this post suggests, it would seem the Democrats in their zeal to punish success are more than willing to beat down all Americans with more taxes in order to punish the very few wealthy Americans.<br />No thank you Democrats, this blogger does not care about the wealthy but I do care about you stealing even more of my money.<br /><br />The make this almost amusing the Democrats claim this will just add to the deficit. Again, the Democrats in their infinite wisdom actually believe a Tax cut is a cost. Also, why would they count this as money in hand before it is, they should have assumed these Bush Tax Cuts would be extended. However, the obvious must be pointed out to the Democrats. Flagrant out of control spending adds to the deficit. NOT raising taxes never adds to a deficit.<br /><br />So it is back to a very basic plan the politicians seem to fail to grasp. Don't spend so much damn money on every idiot scheme thought of. Don't spend so much money on over priced products and services and stop spending on so much the government should not even be involved in.<br /><br />Then perhaps we may see an improvement in the economy.<br /><br />Still back to the original Topic. The reality is the Democrats want to stick it to America. They are not actually going to raise taxes on the wealthy. This is because most of the Democrats themselves are multi millionaires, <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Their</span> buddies in <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Hollywood</span> and many other supporters are all wealthy and the Democrats are hardly going to tax themselves and punish their comrades. This is just another scheme where the Democrats claim they will do one thing, shaft the wealthy when in reality that shaft is meant for the rest of the American people.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-39847684728145617712010-11-30T22:45:00.000-08:002010-11-30T22:51:39.952-08:00The Democrats don't seem to realize they were smacked down...The Democrats were thoroughly smacked down in most of the country and they still push their liberal socialist agenda. This would be amusing if these politicians could only affect themselves and their followers.<br /><br />The Democrats were smacked down in 1994 for similar reasons like over spending and <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">raising</span> taxes and of course restricting freedoms. So the question is why in the world did they think they could do far worse that 1994 in forcing their liberalism down American throats and spending insanely.<br /><br />This happens to be a single example of it being a Good thing anyone who does not read history is doomed to repeat it.<br /><br />Thank you Democrats for repeating 1994, perhaps American will survive.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-49166605113077358222010-08-06T11:51:00.001-07:002010-08-06T11:51:28.149-07:00Banning blackberries in parts of the world, the question is where do governments get the right to need your data?Many countries around the world are beginning to ban blackberries. The claim is the governments can't control the data because it goes to foreign servers and is encrypted. This prevents the government from being able to access the data when they need too.<br /><br />America is not yet attempting this but the American government is also under the false belief that they have a right to our data whenever they feel the need. This need is always couched under the umbrellas of law enforcement and security.<br /><br />Liberty in American means to live free without interference from the government or society. The government has no right to demand that data be accessible to them forever, in case they need it. There is a need to perform law enforcement, they can obtain a warrant and can make a law that days companies like blackberry should provide the ability to decrypt or provide data after the warrant is in place. Otherwise, data should be entirely inaccessible to the government or anyone else.<br /><br />We the people have a right to privacy, a right defined by us, it does not have to be in the constitution to be a right. The government is specifically prohibited from watching us like we are all criminals and having access to our data anytime is in effect monitoring us like big brother.<br /><br />The fact that the data is accessible to the government means features exist to allow access, which can then be exploited by actual criminals as well. Making identity theft easier, because it is easier for the government to control your identity.<br /><br />The people should demand that everything about themselves is owned by them and the government has no right to it.Our name, data, ID cards, money, clothing, whatever owned or is part of a person's identity or life should be entirely controlled by the individual and the government should have no authority to remove it, control it, access it or do anything with it. In truth, the government should not have to know anything about me except the fact I represent a number in the census count.<br /><br />Today, the governments in <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">america</span> lay claim to own all of your IDs, such as a passport. The government should issue a passport but short of criminal investigation, the government should have no authority to revoke or take back a passport for any reason, it is yours, your name and as a free individual, you have the right to receive and keep your passport at all times. The government does not need to know when , where or how you transfer your money. The government does not need to know you travel to many different countries, at least when it comes to friendly countries or ones that are at least not antagonistic to the US. The government does not need to know where you work or why.<br /><br />The bottom line is you and your identity are yours. Identity theft is prevalent because it is the fact the government refuses to make laws protecting your claim to yourself to provide the government access to your data and your activities, which allows for Identity theft to occur. If they made you the sole owner of your own identity, you would be able to protect yourself from criminals and government intrusion because in both cases it is access provided to the government, which gives criminals access as well.<br /><br />Other countries are claiming similar reasons for bans on blackberries but another unspoken reason is censorship. These less than free countries want to be able to scan and search for those who disparage their governments. America is almost there. The US government already tracks everything you do, anywhere in the world or at least they are trying. Already they are trying to pass laws that makes it impossible to have a blog such as this one or TV stations, or radio or other sources of information which disparages the democrats and their socialist agenda.<br /><br />When the government already has access to everything you say and do, , giving themselves the power to take over anything they wish, how long before they are banning blackberries here?<br /><br />http://apnews.excite.com/article/20100806/D9HE3RM80.htmlThe Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-8659156858915273922010-03-21T21:22:00.000-07:002010-03-21T21:35:46.432-07:00We want the American dream back. An appeal to any country friendly to Americans...We the people of America should be completely disgusted and tired of the Democrat party and its supporters. We were not placed on this planet by God to earn money for those jackasses in the democrat party to confiscate from us. Using Ayn Rand's idea in Atlas Shrugged, why should we not remove ourselves from this country to a place that appreciates talented and financially capable individuals. Without people like you the reader and this author, the progressives will have nothing. They need our money to force us to become socialists. Why should we stay here in a place where 47% of the population, 90% of the education system, all unions and the vast majority of all government employees have it out to take everything we own.<br /><br />We the people who are patriots of America are patriots of the idea of government created by the people as defined by the Founding Fathers of this country. We are not obligated to stay in a place where the Constitution no longer applies. I am a patriot of the America where freedom is assured, with a government based on the Constitution created from natural law, my rights are mine to define, the government protects my rights and I can pursue my happiness and live my life anyway I choose. America is not this land, it is the people. It is the 45% of the population that still believes the founding fathers created the best country in history.<br /><br />Ms Rand has a good idea. Why not have Americans take their skills and money to a place that welcomes us. Everyone wants to come to America. What most don't realize is America is the people. It is our attitude, our morals and our culture. We can bring America to any country we adopt and perhaps we should. We can always move back once the progressives and their supporters collapse in their own misery. Why should we stay and let them take everything from us and follow them into the oblivion of socialism they want so much.<br /><br />Perhaps we could appeal to some country in the world, that is willing to take Americans in and let us transform them into the America people want to immigrate too.<br /><br />Isn't the saying that home is where ever you and your loved ones are? America is it's people and we can form this government anywhere in the world. Perhaps we should do something as daring as the Founders and separate ourselves from our oppressors so we can again follow the path leading to the American dream. We should want to have the dream back. The democrats and their supporters have a different dream, one where everyone is equally miserable. The American dream is still alive, it just needs a home because clearly the Democrats have decided to alienate and make unwelcome the American dream and anyone who still believes in that dream.<br /><br />Any government reading this outside of the the United States, consider this idea. If you make laws that welcome Americans as immigrants, you will likely find many willing to relocate. We have money, ethics, skills, morals, fortitude and always do everything possible to help as evidenced by our worldwide generosity. If you believe as we do, that America is a great country, perhaps you can make a second America one based on the original ideas of America and have the American people move to your country and help you create a new and potentially a country that exceeds the greatest nations that have existed in the past.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-13159063023859335702010-03-21T17:15:00.000-07:002010-03-21T17:37:39.763-07:00Obamacare is in and is the next step to the democrats inflicting American with socialismFor the first time in American history a political party has done what only occurred in banana republics, tyrannies and socialist countries in the past. The democrats have forced america into a National Healthcare system that will first tax everyone into poverty for 4 years with no actual benefit and during that 4 years the rest of the law will ensure the private medical industry and insurance industry will cease to exist.<br /><br />Never before have politicians in America passed a law that had the majority of the population against it. Numbers range from 60 to 75% but clearly the majority don't want it. What is clear is the democrats have nailed shut their own coffin and have likely not only lost power this November but may have killed their chance at power again for 20 or more years. The question is what is in this bill that has them willing to let the entire party lose elections in november?<br /><br />Here is what to expect from Obamacare.<br /><br />Taxes going up very high. Of course, the democrats always claim they are taxing the rich and their core voters always buy that line. In reality, these guys are rich themselves and are not going to tax their own money or their friends. It will be the middle class that pays for this. Remember, they need not provide any services until 2014, after Obama's presumed re-election, though he may now only be a 1 term president. So from now until 2014, they will move the taxing from the so called rich , to the middle class. The rich know how to hide their money in ways to ensure no taxing will fall on them and this new law will likely drive the upper middle class into the same tax shelters. This leaves everyone else left to work like good socialist slaves for the benefit of the democrats and the so called poor with no insurance.<br /><br />If you are retired, expect medicare to become more expensive and have reduced services. Obama claims he will "eliminate waste and fraud" in medicare and use that savings for the new national healthcare. Ask yourself when the last time any congress or president has ever dealt with waste or fraud or when they have ever reduced the cost of anything. Be assured just like in England and Canada, if you are retired, you will not be getting much. They government will set up rules that dictate who gets care when and being elderly is a mark against you.<br /><br />The worse is yet to come. As the democrats erode this country by confiscating all money, nationalizing yet another industry and creating a so called "right" to healthcare, they are destroying this country as assuredly as any other socialist nation has destroyed itself.<br /><br />The key is creating a right. The Constiution does not grant the government any authority over rights. WE the people determine rights, the government protects them. Now that the democrats have precedent in creating a right, be assured they will create more and remove the ones they find inconvenient. The government is also taking even more of the economy than at any other time in history. The very protections this country started with to prevent what happened in the House under Nancy Pelosi today. The government does not have the authority to take an industry, nationalize and destroy it and create rights. Those protections are mentioned at the beginning of this blog, limits on funds and senators voted by state legislatures.<br /><br />People, we need to force the democrats out and force the republicans to repeal this law. We have no other choice. If this does not happen, there is no where else for productive americans to go. These people are doing to us what the bolesheviks did to russia, what the current socialists in Europe are doing to their people and we are headed down the path China is on now.<br /><br />At some point, we need to return to the America started by the US constitution because there is no room for a middle class in a socialist nation. Only the rich politicians and their poor slaves can live in the society the Democrats are building today.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-83969065648760286002010-03-11T09:10:00.001-08:002010-03-11T09:21:55.096-08:00The progressive marxist Democrats have handed the ball to the Republicans but will there be any action?The democrats in their zeal to impose communism on the people have basically handed the ball over to the Republicans in November. <div><br /></div><div>The Political Shaman will predict the GOP politicians will not reverse anything the democrats do.</div><div><br /></div><div>Where in the last 70 years has any party reversed anything the previous party did. Sure maybe prohibition could be counted but in reality that had little effect on anything. Do you see the Republicans actually reversing Carbon Tax or <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Healthcare</span> should they be passed? Do you believe the Republicans will enact a new Bush Tax cut after expiration? Do you think the Republicans will return unspent stimulus money, return the land taken recently in a land grab but the feds to own more land in the west? Do you feel the republicans can finally start to dismantle or make more effective Social Security or Medicare?</div><div><br /></div><div>Best of all, do you believe the Republicans will reverse the taxes, spending and regulation killing this country?</div><div><br /></div><div>There is no history supporting any of this. The only thing we can hope for from them is a stalling of the country on its current path to Marxism. That is what the last few decades of history shows. Republicans will slow the damage but not fix it.</div><div><br /></div><div>It will be a good thing to have the progressives out of power. Just don't get too excited because no one is going to actually fix anything either.</div><div><br /></div>The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-69657543888098094652010-03-11T08:55:00.000-08:002010-03-11T09:10:12.769-08:00The democrats are falling apart, yet the still have the power to force us to take anything, or do they?The last few weeks have been incredible with the Democrats causing themselves all kinds of problems. They are losing elections they should not lose, having tickle fests, resigning, not running subsequent terms, taxing the hell out of us, spending more than any time in the past and being called out for pushing their <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">marxist</span> progressive agenda.<div><br /></div><div>The real problem though is the Prophet Obama and Queen <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Pelosi</span> have not just doubled down, they are going all in and have flatly said they will force their <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">healthcare</span> and presumably anything else down our throats, for our own good.</div><div><br /></div><div>Here is the question. How can they force the people into anything? A law must be accepted by the majority of the people or the government will need to use violence to force us. Perhaps the American People need to start ignoring laws passed that are not legitimate nor accepted. The biggest mistake the people ever made was around slavery and the biggest excuse justifying it continuing for so long was "the law". In reality, Congress, nor the Supreme Court could vote for or rule in favor of any slave law because it is impossible for either entity to circumvent unalienable rights. </div><div><br /></div><div>We have a right to live in the country without being forced by the government to do anything detrimental to our ability to live as free individuals. The fact that congress and the prophet may vote or pass a law is totally irrelevant, if the people stand up for their rights and ignore the law. Part of the success of America is the People in general voluntarily follow the law. We follow most laws but not all of them. Most people will speed occasionally or water their lawn against the rules prescribed and have no problem say getting an abortion when it was still illegal or drinking during prohibition. In fact, drug laws are on the books and many ignore those and the rest of the people don't care too much or the government would not have such a hard time enforcing those laws.</div><div><br /></div><div>It is simple People of America, ignore the laws congress passes that are detrimental to us or are against the constitution. Some laws can't be ignored so easily, such as tax laws, since our money is taken before we get it. For these so called laws, perhaps we need to form a class action lawsuit against the individual politicians for passing tax and spending laws that have effectively ruined the economy.</div><div><br /></div><div>Just remember people of America, we don't have to take it from the politician, unless they pick up a gun, they can't force us, unless of course they succeed in removing the 2<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">nd</span> amendment.</div>The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-37869709654100704082010-01-24T19:18:00.000-08:002010-01-24T19:31:44.637-08:00Middle class America, perhaps it is time to leave...Middle class America, 50% of the country is voting in democrat politicians to steal your money, force you out of your homes and vehicles and slowly taking every freedom you have.<br /><br />You are the producers of this country. The engineers, the teachers, the programmers, the technicians, plumbers, mechanics and the ones supporting the liberal socialist programs against your will. Every year these politicians take more and 50% of your fellow citizens vote them in to do this.<br /><br />Perhaps it is time to leave. American is the best country on earth because of the Americans who produce, who live decent lives and simply want to ensure their own families are taken care of and have the generosity to help others when needed. We are America, not the 50% of people taking from you.<br /><br />If we leave, they will not survive. There are plenty of decent countries who would take Americans with open arms, treat us well and since America is us, anywhere we go will effectively be America. This idea is not new as it is the main solution in Atlas Shrugged for example. It would not be a long stay. After all, how long could the liberals last in America without the people whose money they confiscate for their ideology and welfare programs.<br /><br />Not long at all, plus when they implode not only will America be free again for us to go back too, we will be bringing with us other countries likely very friendly to Americans and more than willing to continue the profitable relationship after the liberals have finally defeated themselves.<br /><br />As long as the middle class productive people stay, the democrats will keep stealing our money until we have none, we are all destitute and we will not be able to leave.<br /><br />Just a thought because the only other option is to pick up guns and force the liberals to leave but that would make us no better than they are, after all the end result of the liberal <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">marxist</span> path is an army turned against the people, at least every other example of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">marxism</span> in the past ended this way, why would it be different this time, after 100 million already killed in the last 100 years.<br /><br />Lets follow the example set by the very wealthy, just leave and let the democrats wither away on their own.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-67615212973492110842010-01-24T18:59:00.001-08:002010-01-24T19:18:52.054-08:00Finally the socialist Democrats are losing power but will the republicans do anything useful?Finally, after almost a year of the Prophet Obama, Queen <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Pelosi</span> and Court Jester Reid trying to convert American into a socialist utopia, the people of Massachusetts have spoken. The Democrats have lost their filibuster proof majority which <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">effectively</span> stops the Obama agenda in its tracks, assuming the Republicans have the backbone to actually use the 41 vote advantage they have.<br /><br />It would seem the liberal democrats and Obama their messiah did not learn well the lessons taught by Nikita Khrushchev, former leader of the Soviet Union who said American can't be converted to communism instantly, it has to be done slowly over time. It is a good thing that Obama and his followers do not pay attention to history as we know by their quotes of Chairman Mao and Hollywood <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">celebrities</span> insistence on wearing pictures of Che the Cuban general responsible for killing hundreds. Though perhaps if the progressive liberal <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">marxists</span> in the democrat party did read history, they would know the old progressive <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">marxist</span> agenda is a failure but that may be asking too much.<br /><br />The people of Massachusetts, a dark blue state has overwhelmingly rejected the democrats and <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">their</span> 8 years of insane government incompetence and spending compressed into 1 year. The situation is grim for the democrats and as the Political Shaman predicted, the democrats did go to their core belief of total <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">marxism</span> and attempted to in one year convert American, which predictably failed. We will see the Democrats repeat 1994 and lose everything again but the question is about the republicans. Will they take up the ball, the American people just knocked out of the hands of the democrats?<br /><br />Probably not.<br /><br />You see, the republicans would have to go back to the core Constitutional conservative belief that government is the problem. The republicans would have to actually stop the spending and pay back the stimulus, actually reduce taxes and above all, reduce the cost of government and the effects of bogus regulations.<br /><br />Since no congress in living memory has actually reversed bad laws, truly cut spending and effectively reduced taxes enough to reduce it from a burden to a cost, it is safe to conclude the republicans will not be setting a precedent.<br /><br />We can possibly hope for the republicans to grow a pair and at least go back to the 1994 mentality and perhaps make a new contract with America.<br /><br />It is good news the Democrats have been stopped before they could finish off the country but America will remain on the precipice of destitution as long as the current government and laws remain in place.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-17007381091475441812009-12-07T10:06:00.000-08:002009-12-07T10:15:56.948-08:00The Prophet Obama send troops to Afghanistan using the Bush doctrine for warThe Prophet Obama has finally decided after over 3 months, to send more troops to Afghanistan. His defense of this surge is using the same surge plan that Bush used in Iraq.<br /><br />This is great, The Prophet has screwed everything else up but at least he made a good move here. Iraq and Afghanistan are different, though and it is uncertain we will succeed in a stable government there, which seems to be the goal. In reality, we only need to kill terrorists there, it really makes on difference on the government installed there but it probably can't hurt if the end result is dead terrorists and a stable afghan government.<br /><br />The <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">repubelicans</span> do need to calm down on the 19 months. The same guy who ran the DOD for Bush is still in charge and we should take the Generals at their word that 19 months is merely a time when they will consider if they can change the battle plan. We could be wrong and if so, then it would be on <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Obama's</span> head if he planned to cut and run all along though clearly he is planning to use either a claimed victory or a cut and run as political points for the 2012 election.<br /><br />Either way, the Prophet is doing a Surge, which worked before and is a fairly good plan to try again. Considering his campaign promises were almost entirely the liberal socialist mindset of we just need to understand those that are saying they will kill everyone, it is nice to see that for a moment a few of his braincells worked long enough to make a good decision.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-10773627366089601062009-12-07T09:28:00.001-08:002009-12-07T10:06:37.802-08:00Climategate... We really didn't need it to know these "scientists" were fabricating the entire global warming hysteria<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Climategate</span> is all over the media for the last few days, basically some emails and documents found on a public server show evidence that the so called "scientists" who have claimed that global warming is a human caused planet killing phenomenon were in fact fabricating the entire thing.<br /><br />Do we really need these emails to confirm what should already be known? Their data comes from less than 100 years of temperature data, that is imbalanced across the planet unless you believe the claim that thermometers in the US and Europe and some scattered parts of the planet some how equals the temperature of the entire planet. They rely on tree ring data which only indicates a warming trend for the last few hundred years and does not prove anything about the cause or if it is even unnatural. Ice core data shows the CO2 rise is actually after the temperature rise and is an effect repeated between all of the ice ages, indicated we are in fact between ice ages though this information is suppressed.<br /><br />These "scientists" also have arbitrarily set a "global" temperature and chose what the "normal" temperature should be, even though over earths 4 billion year history, there is no evidence for what "normal" should be nor that this measure is in fact effective.<br /><br />The main "evidence" of all of this hysteria are so called climate models. The scientists use the above suspect and conflicting data as well as the entirely fabricated average global temperature and of course the model will predict catastrophe.<br /><br />None of the so called causes can be repeated or tested in a lab. CO2 is one of the main molecules in the biosphere called earth, how can this possibly be a pollutant. Actual laboratory tests show that water vapor is a better and more likely <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">culprit</span> for global warming, which is caused by a hotter sun. The sun is also proven to be warmer now than it has been in many years.<br /><br />The ice core and other data showing the CO2 and Temperature during and between ice ages, is in fact the best indicator of what is happening. This data shows between every ice age is a huge but short warming period(short is relative to earths 4 billion years) followed by a long ice age. Today's warming is neither hotter than the past nor getting hotter at a higher rate.<br /><br />In short, there is no human caused global warming, the entire thing was fabricated as logic of the "evidence" should show anyone with a brain and proven by these emails.<br /><br />A real scientist would simply gather evidence and form conclusions based on the evidence. What has happened here is <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">climategaters</span> have decided there is human caused global warming and seek to "prove" it by collecting partial data, hiding contrary evidence and fabricating the rest.<br /><br />It is time now we end this nonsense. Should we continue we will suffer more than just the massive financial burden for the cap and trade tax on your breathing.<br /><br />Scientists are moving toward removing "carbon" from the energy production process by storing it underground. Here is the major problem with this. For every CO2 molecule forced underground or otherwise taken out of the atmosphere by one of these methods, is taking 2 oxygen atoms and burying those as well. The Political Shaman has major issues with <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">climategaters</span>, reducing the amount of oxygen in the environment for he would like to have enough to breathe. The only effective way to get this Oxygen back into the atmosphere is to let plants use the CO2, which means leaving the CO2 in the atmosphere. There is no prediction at all on what happens underground if you start filling the empty spaces with CO2, such as saturating the ground water with so much CO2, it becomes undrinkable.<br /><br />Think like these idiot scientists. They will bury CO2, then when there is not enough oxygen, they will give us oxygen tanks, when not enough CO2 is available for plants, they will find a way to manufacture it. This is akin to the perpetual prescription drug problem of doctors giving you one medicine, then another to counter the side effects of the first, then another pill to counteract the side effect of the second medicine.<br /><br />Think deep down in your mind, do you really want these scientists, messing with the planet's biosphere?<br /><br />It makes sense that our burning fossil fuels is creating more CO2, which uses up oxygen. It is a fact that humans do cause pollution. However, CO2 is not the problem. The reason the politicians and scientists want CO2 to be the culprit is because there is no way to measure for the correct amount. It isn't causing any problems, so the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">climategaters</span> can make any claim about it and they will be right how could they not be right, when they fabricated the problem to begin with.<br /><br />There really is actual pollution to end or mitigate in this world, such as sewage in rivers. However, that would take real scientists and real effort to solve and these problems would be solved, something no politician wants, solved problems means no power or money to gain, so why solve them.<br /><br />CO2 and global warming is just a perpetual method for the scientists involved to keep getting grants and politicians to keep making laws to take more money and have a way to persecute those who they don't like.<br /><br />People of the world, do yourselves a favor and vilify the scientists, media and others involved to shut them down forever. Vote out the politicians involved as well. The politicians are as much to blame for the perpetuation of this and nearly every other problem. If we do not, all of us will eventually be just slowly dying, wearing government issues oxygen tanks, eating government produced <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">MREs</span>, living in government approved locations all in the name of saving the planet.The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-84454377370552899562009-11-20T08:30:00.000-08:002009-11-20T08:48:22.485-08:00The government is the problem...Politicians claim almost continuously they will solve all problems. Social Security, Unemployment, recessions, medical costs, insurance costs, banking, war and etc... are all examples of these so called problems and how the politicians will solve them.<div><br /></div><div>The real problem is all of these issue the politicians want to fix, were created and caused by the government itself. Any government program having trouble was created by the politicians, so logically the politicians are the cause of the problems. War is another, though in this case it is other countries political leadership that is the real problem. American politicians are only failures here for letting antagonistic political and theocratic dictators threaten our existence for so long and doing nothing about it but wishing these psychos across the ocean will just see reason.</div><div><br /></div><div>Indirectly, recessions, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">healthcare</span> and nearly every other problem is caused by the politicians because of their interference through taxation, regulation, borrowing and printing money. It would seem the industries with the most problems are also the ones with the most government interference. Taxation and regulation, including the government protecting racketeering efforts by unions, cause recessions. Bailouts were for the more heavily regulated industries or union protected industries. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Healthcare</span> is expensive because of regulation and more regulation is on the way. </div><div><br /></div><div>How can a business hire an employee, when so much capital is redirected into government coffers. After all, the governments through taxes and borrowing are taking nearly 50% of all capital earned each year, is it unreasonable to think the economy will remain in recession when 50% of all capital is being confiscated by the government?</div><div><br /></div><div>Americans and people around the world, the problem we all face is universal. The politician, bureaucrat and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">theocrat</span> are the biggest problems we all face. Getting rid of them and their impact on the world is the best thing we could do for ourselves. This is not advocacy for anarchy, only the replacement of these parasites with men and women who truly will manage the government and limit law to what is necessary for this purpose. Examples of legitimate government tasks are protection of individual rights, protection of the country, mediating disputes between individuals, dealing with criminals and to a limited degree minimizing the effects of fraud from businesses.</div><div><br /></div><div>Anything else the government does is just the nonsense politicians do for their own personal power and wealth.</div><div><br /></div><div>The government is the real problem and it is insane for the people to believe the politicians who cause these problems, will somehow be able to fix them.</div>The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-51243712403903308472009-10-18T00:59:00.000-07:002009-10-18T01:10:55.939-07:00Obamacare, The democrats will force it on America, even if Americans don't want it.It seems that the Democrats are going to force this <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Obamacare</span> insanity on America, no matter what the people say about it.<div><br /></div><div>After voting yes for a "Concept" as the democrats put it, the bill is now in the Senate and will soon be voted on. Democrat politicians have flatly stated that they don't care if the majority of people don't want it. These Democrats do not care if it is going to do nothing and cost massive amounts of money.</div><div><br /></div><div>They can't even explain how it is the combination of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Obamacare</span> and Medicare will cost more than the entire <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">healthcare</span> industry currently is. </div><div><br /></div><div>There is only one goal the Democrats have in mind. Another Marxist welfare program they can use to take more money and maintain power. This happened in the 30s and 60s with Social Security and Medicare. Both are expensive failed systems that succeeded in ensuring Democrats kept power and had an excuse to take money.</div><div><br /></div><div>America wake up. The Democrats are devaluing America faster than the people can recover from the damage. Obama and the democrats have done more damage in less than a year than what normally takes 8 years to do. The American people will not be able to generate a large enough economy at a fast enough rate to absorb 8 years of damage done in 10 months. </div><div><br /></div><div><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Obamacare</span> will make it another 8 years of damage done instantly.</div><div><br /></div><div>Why would they take the tax money for <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Obamacare</span> now but not actually implement the plan until after <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Obama's</span> presumed reelection?</div><div><br /></div><div>Why would <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Obamacare</span> only be for those in need but force everyone else to pay for it?</div><div><br /></div><div>Power and money is all the Democrats want, these welfare bureaucracies they create have only one purpose, power and money.</div><div><br /></div><div>America your country is slowly being bled to death by the Democrats and they have been doing this for decades, when are you going to vote these fools out of power?</div>The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5938844100969384249.post-75988714840053518062009-10-18T00:38:00.000-07:002009-10-18T00:59:13.484-07:00The Prophet Obama gets a Nobel peace prize for doing....Nothing? At least he is AmericanIt is true. The Prophet Obama actually was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing. The committee that voted for him actually admitted they did awarded the price based on the promises that Obama has stated about reducing nuclear weapons and encouraging peace in the areas of the world where Muslim tyrants and communist dictators are doing killing women for speaking out, genocide and threatening the world with destruction.<div><br /></div><div>The Prophet has exacerbated the Afghan war, Iran has admitted to an extra nuclear weapons facility and no where have Muslim terrorists stopped killing and Muslim leaders still <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">saction</span> violence with their laws. So where is the promise of peace the Norwegian committee thinks Obama is going to accomplish?</div><div><br /></div><div>Some people were right to wonder what is going on. Basically stating that the prize should go to someone who has actually done something. </div><div><br /></div><div>The frightening comments were the world leaders who think giving Obama this reward as a prize for bringing America in line with the beliefs of the rest of the world for economics, environmentalism and violence. This is frightening because the rest of the world is a mess and they should be emulating America. If they did, there probably would be peace, less weapons, no more genocides, no slavery, no girls being sprayed with acid, no <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">beheadings</span> and the people of the world would probably have some money to take care of themselves. The world politicians and <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">theocrats</span> have long cherished their freedom to subjugate and kill anyone in the name of their personal power and they want Americans to emulate them?</div><div><br /></div><div>The Nobel committee in Norway proved long ago they are fools and the prize worthless. This happened the day they awarded the prize to the terrorist <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Yasser</span> Arafat. That violent animal murdered who knows how many for his power and through his leadership, the PLO murdered hundreds and rival offshoot organizations murdered hundreds more. Arafat practically invented modern terrorism such as kids strapping bombs to their chest to go murder a bus full of other kids. The Nobel peace prize went to <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Yasser</span> for his promise to stop killing more people. </div><div><br /></div><div>So much for promises. </div><div><br /></div><div>The Prophet Obama has many promises, so far he has not accomplished any of them and in fact is making most of American life harder and certainly has had no influence on peace. How could he have any effect in the world, since he is basically handing over the leadership of the world to the Europeans?</div><div><br /></div><div>At least now the American people can see why the conservatives call him Prophet, Saint or Messiah. It is a joke on the fools who follow a man who can do nothing or make things worse and yet he is still lauded and awarded. </div><div><br /></div><div>The Prophet Obama may have a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing but at least he is American. There are 13 prizes in all and 11 of them went to Americans. This is a good thing at least.</div>The Political Shamanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874139479374824012noreply@blogger.com0