Saturday, 16 May 2015

I
have been working on “The Theory of Everything – on the basis of Dark
Atom & Dark Energy” since, 2013. The present science is based on
the 4% stuffs but my hypothesis is on the basis of 4% + 96% [Dark atom &
Dark energy]. I have not only explained & re-explained different phenomenon
but also predicted the different phenomenon on the basis of my hypothesis.

1.I received a call
& mail from [America] Partridge India - a Penguin Random
House Company to publish book last year, but again due to lack of money &
writing skill, I failed.

2.I
received mail for Professional membership with 20% discount from “New York
Academy of Sciences (NYAS)” but failed due to money.

3.I sent the entry
for “Physics Innovation Award - 2015” after receiving mail from Elsevier
Journal

IN MARCH & APRIL 2015, MY HYPOTHESIS PROVED CORRECT:

a.ON “GRAVITATION”

In
march’15 European Space Agency has confirm on the basis of data from Planck Satellite that Gravitation & Dark
Energy may be linked [in aug’2013 (19th
months back) I sent the manuscript in “General Relativity & Gravitation”
with title “Gravitation - a pushing force [a layman concept of unified dark
energy]”

On
25th, March’2015 NASA on the basis of HUBBLE & CHANDRA LAB
confirmed that Dark Matter is not interacting as much as predicted earlier[since
2013 I have been writing that Dark Atoms are readjusting themselves most of the
time - details are in the link below]

Now,
finally my abstract is selected for Vietnam Conference on “PLANETARY SYSTEM
– a synergistic view”, in July’ 2015. [American Association for Advancement
of Science- AAAS, has called abstract from me]

MY
WORK IS EXPLAINING & RE-EXPLAINING ALL THE ABOVE ON THE BASIS OF 4% + 96%
[dark atom & dark energy]

Saturday, 4 April 2015

I have already written on 20th March'2015 in an
abstract submitted for Vietnam conference on " Planetary System : A
Synergistic View" going to held in July'2015 in response to an abstract
call from AAAS

"Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus & Neptune are not a planet; they are junior
Sun (Jr. SUN). THEY CAME IN THE SYSTEM during speedy contraction of Sun, just
after supernova blast.

Long before Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars formed, it seems
that the inner solar system may have harbored a number of super-Earths—planets
larger than Earth but smaller than Neptune. If so, those planets are long
gone—broken up and fallen into the sun billions of years ago largely due to a
great inward-and-then-outward journey that Jupiter made early in the solar
system's history.

This possible scenario has been suggested by Konstantin
Batygin, a Caltech planetary
scientist, and Gregory Laughlin of UC Santa Cruz in a paper that appears the
week of March 23 in the online edition of the Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The results of their calculations and
simulations suggest the possibility of a new picture of the early solar system
that would help to answer a number of outstanding questions about the current
makeup of the solar system and of Earth itself. For example, the new work
addresses why the terrestrial planets in our solar system have such relatively
low masses compared to the planets orbiting other sun-like stars.

"Our work suggests that Jupiter's inward-outward
migration could have destroyed a first generation of planets and set the stage
for the formation of the mass-depleted terrestrial planets that our solar
system has today," says Batygin, an assistant professor of planetary science.
"All of this fits beautifully with other recent developments in
understanding how the solar system evolved, while filling in some gaps."

Thanks to recent surveys of exoplanets—planets in solar
systems other than our own—we know that about half of sun-like stars in our
galactic neighborhood have orbiting planets. Yet those systems look nothing
like our own. In our solar system, very little lies within Mercury's orbit;
there is only a little debris—probably near-Earth asteroids that moved further
inward—but certainly no planets. That is in sharp contrast with what
astronomers see in most planetary systems. These systems typically have one or
more planets that are substantially more massive than Earth orbiting closer to
their suns than Mercury does, but very few objects at distances beyond.

"Indeed, it appears that the solar system today is
not the common representative of the galactic planetary census. Instead we are
something of an outlier," says Batygin. "But there is no reason to think that the
dominant mode of planet formation throughout the galaxy should not have
occurred here. It is more likely that subsequent changes have altered its
original makeup."

According to Batygin and Laughlin, Jupiter is critical to understanding how
the solar system came to be the way it is today. Their model incorporates
something known as the Grand Tack scenario, which was first posed in 2001 by a
group at Queen Mary University of London and subsequently revisited in 2011 by
a team at the Nice Observatory. That scenario says that during the first few
million years of the solar system's lifetime, when planetary bodies were still
embedded in a disk of gas and dust around a relatively young sun, Jupiter
became so massive and gravitationally influential that it was able to clear a
gap in the disk. And as the sun pulled the disk's gas in toward itself, Jupiter
also began drifting inward, as though carried on a giant conveyor belt.

"Jupiter would have continued on that belt,
eventually being dumped onto the sun if not for Saturn," explains Batygin. Saturn formed after
Jupiter but got pulled toward the sun at a faster rate, allowing it to catch
up. Once the two massive planets got close enough, they locked into a special
kind of relationship called an orbital resonance, where their orbital periods
were rational—that is, expressible as a ratio of whole numbers. In a 2:1
orbital resonance, for example, Saturn would complete two orbits around the sun
in the same amount of time that it took Jupiter to make a single orbit. In such
a relationship, the two bodies would begin to exert a gravitational influence
on one another.

"That resonance allowed the two planets to open up
a mutual gap in the disk, and they started playing this game where they traded
angular momentum and energy with one another, almost to a beat," says Batygin. Eventually, that
back and forth would have caused all of the gas between the two worlds to be
pushed out, a situation that would have reversed the planets' migration
direction and sent them back outward in the solar system. (Hence, the
"tack" part of the Grand Tack scenario: the planets migrate inward
and then change course dramatically, something like a boat tacking around a
buoy.)

In an earlier model developed by Bradley Hansen at
UCLA, the terrestrial planets conveniently end up in their current orbits with
their current masses under a particular set of circumstances—one in which all
of the inner solar system's planetary building blocks, or planetesimals, happen to populate a
narrow ring stretching from 0.7 to 1 astronomical unit (1 astronomical unit is
the average distance from the sun to Earth), 10 million years after the sun's
formation. According to the Grand Tack scenario, the outer edge of that ring
would have been delineated by Jupiter as it moved toward the sun on its
conveyor belt and cleared a gap in the disk all the way to Earth's current
orbit.

But what about the inner edge? Why should the planetesimals be limited to the
ring on the inside? "That point had not been addressed," says Batygin.

He says the answer could lie in primordial
super-Earths. The empty hole of the inner solar system corresponds almost
exactly to the orbital neighborhood where super-Earths are typically found
around other stars. It is therefore reasonable to speculate that this region
was cleared out in the primordial solar system by a group of first-generation
planets that did not survive.

Batygin and Laughlin's calculations and simulations show that
as Jupiter moved inward, it pulled all the planetesimals it encountered along the way into orbital resonances
and carried them toward the sun. But as those planetesimals got closer to the sun, their orbits also
became elliptical. "You cannot reduce the size of your orbit without
paying a price, and that turns out to be increased ellipticity," explains Batygin. Those new, more
elongated orbits caused the planetesimals, mostly on the order of 100 kilometers in radius, to
sweep through previously unpenetrated regions of the disk,
setting off a cascade of collisions among the debris. In fact, Batygin's calculations show
that during this period, every planetesimal would have collided with another object at least once
every 200 years, violently breaking them apart and sending them decaying into
the sun at an increased rate.

The researchers did one final simulation to see what
would happen to a population of super-Earths in the inner solar system if they
were around when this cascade of collisions started. They ran the simulation on
a well-known extrasolar system known as
Kepler-11, which features six super-Earths with a combined mass 40 times that
of Earth, orbiting a sun-like star. The result? The model predicts that the
super-Earths would be shepherded into the sun by a decaying avalanche of planetesimals over a period of
20,000 years.

"It's a very effective physical process,"
says Batygin. "You only need
a few Earth masses worth of material to drive tens of Earth masses worth of
planets into the sun."

Batygin notes that when Jupiter tacked around, some fraction
of the planetesimals it was carrying with
it would have calmed back down into circular orbits. Only about 10 percent of
the material Jupiter swept up would need to be left behind to account for the
mass that now makes up Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars.

From that point, it would take millions of years for
those planetesimals to clump together and
eventually form the terrestrial planets—a scenario that fits nicely with
measurements that suggest that Earth formed 100-200 million years after the
birth of the sun. Since the primordial disk of hydrogen and helium gas would
have been long gone by that time, this could also explain why Earth lacks a
hydrogen atmosphere. "We formed from this volatile-depleted debris,"
says Batygin.

And that sets us apart in another way from the majority
of exoplanets. Batygin expects that most exoplanets—which are mostly
super-Earths—have substantial hydrogen atmospheres, because they formed at a
point in the evolution of their planetary disk when the gas would have still
been abundant. "Ultimately, what this means is that planets truly like
Earth are intrinsically not very common," he says.

The paper also suggests that the formation of gas giant
planets such as Jupiter and Saturn—a process that planetary scientists believe
is relatively rare—plays a major role in determining whether a planetary system
winds up looking something like our own or like the more typical systems with
close-in super-Earths. As planet hunters identify additional systems that
harbor gas giants, Batygin and Laughlin will
have more data against which they can check their hypothesis—to see just how
often other migrating giant planets set off collisional cascades in their planetary systems, sending
primordial super-Earths into their host stars.

The researchers describe their work in a paper titled
"Jupiter's Decisive Role in the Inner Solar System's Early Evolution.“

Friday, 3 April 2015

Please refer my 2nd OPINION written on 24th, Jan’2015 under heading “Theory of
Everything – on the basis of Dark atom & Dark energy”. In which I had
clearly written:

12. “in black hole information are
lost”

2ND OPINION: in
fact there is no information loss in sense matter & energy goes in matter
& energy comes out. One side matters are destructed on other side matters
are created [can be explained by the inner structure of galactic core &
formation].

The "information loss paradox" in
black holes—a problem that has plagued physics for nearly 40 years—may not
exist.

Shred a document, and you can piece it
back together. Burn a book, and you could theoretically do the same. But
send information into
a black hole, and it's lost forever.

That's what some physicists have argued
for years: That black holes are
the ultimate vaults, entities that suck in information and then evaporate
without leaving behind any clues as to what they once contained.

But new research shows that this
perspective may not be correct.

"According to our work,
information isn't lost once it enters a black hole," says DejanStojkovic,
PhD, associate professor of physics at the University at Buffalo. "It
doesn't just disappear."

Stojkovic's new
study, "Radiation from a Collapsing Object is Manifestly Unitary,"
appeared on March 17 in Physical Review
Letters,
with UB PhD student AnshulSaini as co-author.

The paper outlines how interactions
between particles emitted by a black hole can reveal information about what
lies within, such as characteristics of the object that formed the black hole
to begin with, and characteristics of the matter and energy drawn inside.

This is an important discovery, Stojkovic
says, because even physicists who believed information was not lost in black
holes have struggled to show, mathematically, how this happens. His new paper
presents explicit calculations demonstrating how information is preserved, he
says.

The research marks a significant step
toward solving the "information loss paradox," a problem that has
plagued physics for almost 40 years, since Stephen Hawking first proposed that
black holes could radiate energy and evaporate over time. This posed a huge
problem for the field of physics because it meant that information inside a
black hole could be permanently lost when the black hole disappeared—a
violation of quantum mechanics, which states that information must be
conserved.

Information hidden in particle
interactions

In the 1970s, Hawking proposed that
black holes were capable of radiating particles, and that the energy lost
through this process would cause the black holes to shrink and eventually
disappear. Hawking further concluded that the particles emitted by a black hole
would provide no clues about what lay inside, meaning that any information held
within a black hole would be completely lost once the entity evaporated.

Though Hawking later said he was wrong
and that information could escape from black holes, the subject of whether and
how it's possible to recover information from a black hole has remained a topic
of debate.

Stojkovic and Saini's new paper helps to clarify the story.

Instead of looking only at the
particles a black hole emits, the study also takes into account the subtle
interactions between the particles. By doing so, the research finds that it is
possible for an observer standing outside of a black hole to recover information
about what lies within.

Interactions between particles can
range from gravitational attraction to the exchange of mediators like photons
between particles.
Such "correlations" have long been known to exist, but many
scientists discounted them as unimportant in the past.

"These correlations were often
ignored in related calculations since they were thought to be small and not
capable of making a significant difference," Stojkovic
says. "Our explicit calculations show that though the correlations start
off very small, they grow in time and become large enough to change the
outcome."

On 20th, March’ 2015, I have
sent abstract for Vietnam conference in July on “Planetary Systems: A
Synergistic View” after receiving mail from AAAS. This time again I have
written the role of 5th force.

Apart from it my concept of “Dark Matter” got strength
when NASA is saying which I have been saying since 2013.

Researchers at the Large Hadron Collider just
recently started testing the accelerator for running at the higher energy
of 13 TeV,
and already they have found new insights into the fundamental structure of the
universe. Though four fundamental forces – the strong force, the weak
force, the electromagnetic force and gravity – have been well documented and
confirmed in experiments over the years, CERN announced today the first
unequivocal evidence for the Force. “Very impressive, this
result is,” said a diminutive green spokesperson for the laboratory.

“The
Force is what gives a particle physicist his powers,” said CERN theorist Ben
Kenobi of the University of MosEisley, Tatooine. “It’s an energy field created by all
living things. It surrounds us; and penetrates us; it binds the galaxy
together.”

Though
researchers are as yet unsure what exactly causes the Force, students and
professors at the laboratory have already started to harness its power.
Practical applications so far include long-distance communication, influencing
minds, and lifting heavy things out of swamps.

Kenobi
says he first started teaching the ways of the Force to a young lady who was
having trouble revising for her particle-physics exams. "She said that I
was her only hope," says Kenobi. "So I just kinda
took it from there. I designed an experiment to detect the Force, and passed on
my knowledge."

Kenobi's
seminal paper "May the Force be with EU" – a strong argument that his
experiment should be built in Europe – persuaded the CERN Council to finance
the installation of dozens of new R2 units for the CERN data centre*. These
plucky little droids are helping physicists to cope with the flood of data from
the laboratory's latest experiment, the Thermodynamic Injection Energy (TIE)
detector, recently installed at the LHC.

"We're
very pleased with this new addition to CERN's accelerator complex," said
data analyst Luke Daniels of human-cyborg relations. "The TIE detector has
provided us with plenty of action, and what's more it makes a really cool sound
when the beams shoot out of it."

But
the research community is divided over the discovery. Dark-matter researcher
Dave Vader was unimpressed, breathing heavily in disgust throughout the press
conference announcing the results, and dismissing the cosmological implications
of the Force with the quip "Asteroids do not concern me".

Rumours are
growing that this rogue researcher hopes to delve into the Dark Side of
the Standard Model,
and could even build his own research station some day. With the academic
community split, many are tempted by Vader's invitations to study the Dark
Side, especially researchers working with red lasers, and anyone really with an
evil streak who looks good in dark robes.

"We
hope to continue to study the Force, and perhaps use it to open doors with our
minds and fly around and stuff," said TIE experimentalist Fan Buoi.
"Right now, to be honest, I don't really care how it works. The theory
department have some crackpot idea about life forms called midi-chlorians,
but frankly I think that poorly thought out explanations like that just detract
from how cool the Force really is."

With
the research ongoing, many at CERN are already predicting that the Force will
awaken later this year.