Indeed, stay-at-homes moms save the state's highway infrastructure from meltdown, especially since a "nanny" often drives to the working mom's house, putting three cars on the road where otherwise one would do.

Homeschooling moms further ease the strain on the ecosystem by keeping their kids off the road. The California judged who ruled that "parents do not have a constitutional right to homeschool their children" obviously did not prepare an environmental impact statement before doing so.

That's right. Women should be staying home so they can conserve gasoline! He goes on to say that divorce creates a need for more houses, therefore also increasing the use of resources, yet another environmentally-damaging effect of women's liberation. So I guess the obvious next logical leap is that we're all intentionally warming the planet in order to justify a few more abortions. How else would we bring our master plan to fruition?