Global Questions

1. Let's think about a company that has a great strategy, develops a great plan and then starts implementation. What should they be doing to monitor and adjust the tactics as they are implementing. What if they find the approach is not working as well as expected? What should they do?

2. Does making the adjustment to rectify the problem automatically count for alignment of a tactic to corporate strategy or is it just an adjustment to ensure the product is completed on time? You mentioned that tactics were incorporated into the strategic planning portion of producing the product, however, let's say that production is being backed up from lag time caused by a machine part that is on back order and that machine part is vital to the functioning of the machine necessary to produce the part that you are manufacturing. In this case, what is the tactic that is necessary to bring the strategy (producing a quality product) into alignment with the corporate objectives and how would you recognize it?

3. You mentioned that transnational organizations tactics can be aligned with strategies in numerous ways. You mentioned that having everything written down and their goals and so forth. But you mention the strategies that management should try and implement by having meetings and discuss company goals. My question is to you is when will the employees or the department have a chance to partake in the strategies of setting new goals? How would this be constructed among management? How often would evaluations take place? Would you say that setting departmental goals is more achievable to obtain the overall organizations goal? What strategy or contingency plan is in place in case of goals fail? In your below post, would you consider implementing Six Sigma in the planning process as a form of using another tactic?

4. In the area of diversity there are a lot of historical and philosophical issues that can get in the way. For instance a management team with a strongly Jewish orientation will have a very difficult time developing trust with an Arabic owned company. A British company will have a lot harder time working with a Northern Ireland company than an American company would have.
How does a company work around these historical perspectives? Can it actually be done? At times I am not so sure.

Solution Preview

1. Let's think about a company that has a great strategy, develops a great plan and then starts implementation. What should they be doing to monitor and adjust the tactics as they are implementing? What if they find the approach is not working as well as expected? What should they do?

The organization should monitor and adjust tactics they are implementing in a number of ways. This can get done effectively by means of having surveys given to those who are customers and with employees within the company. They will grasp what it is they need to improve on based off the results; however, one should do this as often as possible but to not overdo it. Also, management should implement slowly over a period of 2 years because people will become open to it, and they will want to contribute to it if they are told about it over a long period of time, so individuals can feel empowered during the entire process.

If the approach is not working as well as expected, then they should change what it is that it making things go wrong, so that the business does not lose revenue. They should continue to remain sensitive to others during this process because people could act out behaviorally, and decide to not want to help at all during the changes. Regardless, the goal is to help others see the company's vision and to do so effectively, so that they will gain prospects and do well for years to come.

2. Does making the adjustment to rectify the problem automatically count for alignment of a tactic to corporate strategy, or is it just an adjustment to ensure the product is completed on time? You mentioned that tactics were incorporated into the strategic planning portion of producing the product, however, let's say that production is being backed up from lag time caused by a machine part that is on ...

Solution Summary

This solution discussed strategy, product alignment and diversity.

$2.19

Purchase Solution

$2.19

Related Solutions

Hello, I have a short case with two questions (1.5 pages in total) that I would like an opinion on. I am not looking for any answer, but rather something to help push me along. I am especially stuck on question 2. I will have to do my own research and support my own position, but I feel I need a push.
Please see attachment,

Discuss the following questions:
What is the global potential in the moviemaking industry?
How well do movies travel across borders?
Is the filmmaking industry global?
What factors would you consider in determining how global an industry is or should be? Use concepts from the text and supplemental reading to support

I'm answering some questions with relation to a case study on Cochlear Ltd, and one of the questions is:
1. "What are the particular features of the global hearing implants market, compared to other commodity markets"
2. Could you please provide some assistance with regard to these different features, or at least point me

Find some examples of international companies in the United States that demonstrate a global management approach to their operations. Provide some specific examples of practices or strategies that demonstrate this approach.
Then answer the following questions:
* Why has it become so important for companies to become

Consider the following function:
f(x,y) = xy
on the set S = {x^2 +4y^2 ≤ 1}.
a) Explain by applying a relevant theorem why f(x,y) has a global maximum and a global minimum in the set S.
b) Find the critical of f in the interior of the set S.
c) Use the method of Lagrange multipliers to find the minima and maxim

Question (1)
In The New Competition for Global Resources, a special report prepared by the Boston Consulting Group and Wharton, the Triple E threat driving new understandings about the global future, leadership, and competition was defined as "the need to compete with everyone, from everywhere, for everything".
Answer the