Sniping might be fine but women are more valuable reproductively and they'd likely be raped by the savages if they were captured and so forth.

Haha I would like to think that not all women would be good fighters just like not all men are good fighters. And vice versa. Depends on the individual in my opinion. Take the infamous Rhonda Rousey. Would you rather have her fighting by your side or some skinny white guy that can barely hold a gun?

I can, and certainly will (if I'm not actively pregnant/nursing/needed in the home to care for small children).

I train in MMA, know my weapons, run very fast, and can see in the dark. Anyone crosses my line, and their *** is mine.

Unlike a lot of women, I have zero empathy. Logic and the fear of God keep me in line, doing the right thing. Normally, this is seen (rightfully so) as a shortcoming. But this character flaw of mine would be an asset in times of war. I would be absolutely ruthless and thorough with the enemy if attacked.

Yes, we women are reproductively valuable—but so are our men. Why do some people here insist on devaluing our men?

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Day of Vengeance

and they'd likely be raped by the savages if they were captured and so forth.

That is a valid concern, but only if we are fighting a non-white army. If the army is White it wouldn't matter a bit. Men can be raped too, btw, and sexual abuse of male wartime prisoners is real. Its true however, that it is less likely to end up producing a pregnancy, and thus a hybrid.

Of course I would. I believe I was born to fight. If I wasn't planning on having more kids, which may or may not happen, I would gladly risk death for my people with a smile on my face, no doubt about it.