In any case, what is
certain is that the M5S Venice will carefully about the
whole operation, even in the years to come, because here
you are likely to give an irreparable blow to the
finances of the City, a non-profit that over the years
could lead to amount to hundreds of millions, worst of
derivatives. And that's just to have a little 'money
immediately and do well in the next election, or to make
speculation in Tester. But we will be ready to report to
the Audit Court any loss of revenue!

It is evident, therefore, that we strongly oppose this
latest sell-off of public assets cheap communal, the
most serious and ultimately, that you should perform
according to the intentions of our directors, in terms
of price unacceptable.

Among other things, we presented three amendments to the
draft resolution for the sale of the Casino, proposing
to define more clearly some of the many dark sides of
this operation. That the company CSV Sap was dissolved
and its assets transferred to the City, both to increase
the municipal assets, either because we do not believe
that the City should be appropriate to the municipal
companies that deal in real estate speculation;

That the mark of the Venice Casino became the property
of the municipality (which would have granted the
company Meeting & Dining's Sal for free, just for the
duration of the concession). This is to avoid future
lawsuits (because we think, what could happen in thirty
years). We had hoped that a minimum of coherence and
sensitivity to the public what you could do in the
street who has so far proved unable to seriously plan
the future of our city. Unfortunately, it was not even
caught one of our sensible suggestions: our amendments
were rejected and in the City Council went ahead with
the sell-off as trains.