Fernando's Filters' # 1

Let us say that we want to filter out from a source of combos such as the 1000 straight or the 220 boxed ones the last Mostly Pattern, that is the Mostly pattern that the last draw has, by doing this we will be filtering out 250 straight combos or 55 boxed combos from our source of numbers.Let us see how doing such a thing would work out with these past Indiana Eve draws:We will start with the oldest draws working down towards the newest draws and let us see how many filter's wins we get and how many "Filter's Failures" we get by filtering out numbers in this way:

In those 77 draws tested there were about 12 filter's failures and 65 filter's wins for that one filter.So on those 77 draws tested the failures were about 1/6 of the draws and the wins were about5/6 of the draws more or less, so for every 1 failure there were about 5 wins more or less.

That filter did as well as could be expected, filter's failure rates lower than those are very hard to get no matter what.

Also let us remember that filter's failures add-up to each other, that is the failures of onefilter add-up to the failures of another filter and so on.

Problems with the Formatting and Editing, because of whatever problems, puts limitations on how I post and on what I can post, that makes for incomplete posts.

For whatever reasons there will always be problems with the editing and formatting of the posts, NotePad and WordPad are just not the same as the LP's Rich Text Editor things just don't translate quite right from one to the other for what-ever reasons.

The same happens between LotSoft and NotePad.

The only solution for this would be to upload the text and or Rich Text files to some free server and have people download them from there, but sooner or later the files would disappear from that server.

Maybe I could upload them up to my free site.

Maybe in the future I might do that and just post the links here, or show a preview of the post here and upload the full post to my site or to a free up-down load server.

I hate editing and formatting problems.

Sooner or later one day I will move to my site anyway.

As you can see, little by little, I have been getting people ready to learn more and more.

08/21/06...... 3...... 9...... 8 Second last past draw.......................6........6.......7 = 6-6-7 Won Next was 330Workout08/22/06...... 9...... 3...... 1 Last past draw......................6........0.......1 = 6-0-1 Won Next Was 43308/23/06...... 3...... 3...... 0 Very next draw.

---------

There the 6 is the difference in digits between the 3 on top and the 9 down.

The next 6 is the difference in digits between the 9 on top and the 3 down.

The 7 is the difference in digits between the 8 on top and the 1 down.

3...... 3...... 0 were the next draw's numbers that came out after 931.

This is one of my advanced or 2nd degree filter's techniques.

There are others that are even a lot harder to understand, with a few of them,even I have problems.

That is one reason why I didn't post about such things before, I have to get people ready little by little first.

That is why you are having trouble with it.

It is very hard even for me to try to explain them here by writing about them, some-things have to be explained person to person.

If audio links were possible here then it might be just a little easier, but I am not sure.

No, I have no idea how I can explain that better other than face to face, sorry.

I myself have been able in the past to make pick 3 predictions just using a very few past draws, like anywhere from 1 to 100 past draws and more often than not just with the last 10 draws as that is the number of past draws that the Lottery Post gives to me for free, for more past draws than that I have used Lottery America.

As manually updating databases has always been something that I don't like to do, it has always been best to develop prediction techniques that can work with only a very few past draws, even just 4 past draws.

To me big draws' databases are more of a burden than a help.

To me Ricky's FreeWheelers and the Crunch 2 (3) are the only 2 most have programs at this time.

There are many other programs that I have tried that can be of some help in one way or another, but none of them are a most have, I have not yet tried LottoArchitect so I can't say anything about it at this time.

To me, for pick 3, the last 10 to last 100 past draws' statistics are much more important and the last 10 up to the last 30 are the most important ones.

Thanks a lot, but I would be lying if I say that I understand what those numbers, stats and charts mean.

Your spreadsheets and their stats are way beyond me, that stuff passes over my head as they say, it is way beyond my comprehension, just the same, thanks very much.

It is true that I have not taken the time to study Excel and your spreadsheets yet, sorry.

But even if I had I might still not be able to understand a lot of what is in them.

Thank you again anyway.

-----------------

As to this filters thread:

I have already shown more than enough filters, just take a good look at all of my filters' posts as Lantern and as Excalibur.

The thing to learn is how to use them and better, how to use them right in a way that will reduce the filters' failures as much as possible.

The problem is that there are an unacceptable number or percent of filters' failures.

As the failures of filters add-up (Together) to each other, so that the more filters used the more filters' failures that there will be.

There are many ways in which filters can be used, some of them produce fewer gains and more failures than others.

Very close and repeated observation of the past draws and their stats are a most do for the filters' proper use.

Imagination most also be used and many things tried out.

----------------------

The failures defeat the purpose of using the filters as we all know.

-----------------------

There-fore tricks and or ways that minimize the failures of filters most be found and then used.

This might be an on-going process as causes and their solutions might change, so minimizing failures might be a dynamic process.

-------------

Anyhow, one maybe should play detective and find causes and solutions if it is possible to do.

One needs to try to analyze the possible cause or causes of why a particular filter failed at a particular draw, of course the direct and main cause was that a particular pattern was used as a filter, but Why it worked with one or more draws and failed with one or more others?

It is obvious that static filters' techniques will produce many failures.

And the same with semi-static (Semi-dynamic), that is techniques that have both: Static and dynamic filters' elements in them.

Perhaps some kind of more fluid or dynamic filters' techniques are needed to reduce the number of failures as much as possible.

This things are easier said than done, but I have made some small advances in that.

-----------

Filters I have many (More than enough), but I still don't have enough right ways of using them.

In the future and soon I will no longer try to find new filters, just right ways of using them.

--------

Talks of "Random" are unproductive and one most stay away from them.

-------

The only truth is that everything is "Relative", "In Relation to", or "Relative to", there is no "Random", just "Relativity" and "It's Cause and Re-Action", "In Relation To"

That and "Statistics" or "Relative to" "Statistics" is all that matters "Prediction-Wise".

--------

Now those words might put and end to this particular thread.

I again repeat, there is a lot of information in very many of my past posts, but mostly on my filters' post.

They are a most for proper understanding of pick 3 filters and their use.

Yes, I know that again I am not telling everything, but Who ever does?