Besides the elimination of anonymous judging, there are also proposals to:
1. change every free skate duration to 4 minutes (and 7 jumps instead of 8 for the men)
2. change the PCs factors so they are the same for men and ladies
3. allow only two repetitions of each double (including double axel)
4. count ChSq even if executed before the StSq
5. allow triple twist in junior pairs short program
6. up the age limit for junior pairs and ice dance (21 instead of 20 for the men)
7. EDIT : can't find the proposal anymore, i'm confused... maybe it didn't understand the right thing !
8. count a triple that is repeated but not combined as a jump executed alone and just give 70% of the base value, instead of counting it as a sequence
9. remove the choreographic sequence of the pairs free program
10. give 30 seconds and not 60 seconds for the skater to take his starting position (but 60 seconds for the first skater of the flight)

(These are the ones i remember and that i found more interesting ; i read it very quickly)

I don't really agree with allowing the triple twist in Junior Pairs SP, since there are SOME couples that are capable of wonderful twists (F/M, T/M and the Chinese ones come to my mind, for example), but most aren't, so we would see a lot of disastrous attempts that is some cases could also lead to serious injuries I think, because if it was allowed in the SP much more couples would begin to attempt it earlier, when they're not technically ready... And those terrible attempts would be aesthetically awful too!!

Yeah. The idea why the pcs are different is so that the technical and presentation scores in each discipline could be similar. It can get confusing to the audience if there was a great discrepency in points between the technical and presentation mark. That is why they factor the pcs

That's fine, but interpretation and other things doesn't have to be about TES does it?

Yes, but it would be strange have a 90 TES and a 70 PCS, wouldn't it? But I agree that having different factors implies that judging is relative and not absolute, which isn't exactly the basis on which IJS was created

^ Still, I think an even more important feature of the IJS is the concept of a "balanced program." In particular, the factoring maintains a balance between technical elements and the program as a whole.

Without factoring, a skater might get, let's say, 45 "absolute" points in PCS. This would correspond to straight 9.0s across the board. Here is how that would work out for a men's and a ladies' short and long programs, without factoring.

The factoring adjusts all of these "expected" ratios to 50%. This is kind of an overall expectation built into the system. Of course an individual skater might be stronger in technical elements than in presentations skills, or vice versa.