tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10365680.post4876726208462658914..comments2015-03-03T08:48:41.196-08:00Comments on THE UFO CHRONICLES : New Information Surfaces Re Famous Socorro UFO CaseFrank Warrenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18211373074817092828noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10365680.post-61691608596420289732014-06-06T15:01:02.794-07:002014-06-06T15:01:02.794-07:00Hi Jason,
Thanks for taking time to make comment...Hi Jason, <br /><br />Thanks for taking time to make comment. The answer to your questions can be found in Ray&#39;s 2nd part: <a href="http://www.theufochronicles.com/2014/06/new-revelations-re-socorro-ufo-incident.html" rel="nofollow">New Revelations Re Socorro UFO Incident<br />– Pt 2 – </a><br /><br />Cheers,<br />FrankFrank Warrenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18211373074817092828noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10365680.post-43006065613739719202014-06-06T14:27:24.003-07:002014-06-06T14:27:24.003-07:00Dear Editor &amp; Readers: in trying to follow you...Dear Editor &amp; Readers: in trying to follow your guidelines for making &#39;comment,&#39; without making a &#39;vitriolic attack,&#39; please allow a constructive observation. To wit: the concealing of the actual shape of the &#39;insignia&#39; on the aka &#39;space ship.&#39; Why should that simple point be withheld and then replaced with a fictitious one? Therein is where these ignorant, &quot;internet loudmouths&quot; have the fodder to flame their fires of disbelief. Why would both men, the late Mr. Zamora and Capt. Holder, produce a form of deceit on an insignia? Did they feel the actual one revealed something the public should not know of? All I saw in the drawing was a bottomless triangle with a line coming down the top middle section. What design did they come up with? We don&#39;t know, unless we buy Mr. Stanford&#39;s book as he sites the pages. Why not tell us in this post? By changing the actual insignia and replacing it with an incorrect one is to falsify the report. Yet another black eye for ufology when people come forward to tell of a sighting and then make their own changes to the reality. Of course, had there been a photo or film of the object, then we would know what the insignia looked like. It sounds like these men have tried to create blooming interest in a fact that is not the truth. Correct? I don&#39;t believe this comment is harsh or a vitriolic attack when I am simply stating a fact about withholding a fact. Yes? Regards, Jason Greywolf LeighUnknownhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01070440264702563452noreply@blogger.com