[X]
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018

[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For
the transition period from ________________ to ________________

Commission
file number: 000-55120

Arias
Intel Corp.

(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

46-2143018

(State
or other jurisdiction of

incorporation
or organization)

(I.R.S.
Employer

Identification
No.)

442
W. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 200

Tampa,
Florida

33606

(Address
of principal executive offices)

(Zip
Code)

Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code (877) 749-5909

First
Harvest Corp.

(Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)

Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

N/A

Title
of each class

Name
of each exchange on which registered

Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Shares
of common stock, par value $0.001 per share

Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes
[ ] No [X]

Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.

Yes
[ ] No [X]

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes
[X] No [ ]

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes
[X] No [ ]

Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.

Large
accelerated filer

[ ]

(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)

Accelerated
filer

[ ]

Non-accelerated
filer

[ ]

Smaller
reporting company

[X]

Emerging
growth company [ ]

If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes
[ ] No [X]

The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting shares of common stock held by non-affiliates as of September 29, 2017
based on the closing sales price of the common stock as reported by the OTC Markets was $94,363,285.

As
of July 12, 2018, 50,707,248 shares of the registrant’s common stock were issued and outstanding.

This
Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Security Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”). Any statements in Annual Report on Form 10-K about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions
or future events or performance are not historical facts and are forward-looking statements.
These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “believe,” “will,”
“expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan” and “would.”
For example, statements concerning financial condition, possible or assumed future results of operations, growth opportunities,
industry ranking, plans and objectives of management, markets for our common stock and future management and organizational structure
are all forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our business
based, in part, on assumptions made by management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may, and are likely to, differ
materially from what is expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to numerous factors, including those described
below and additional risks discussed herein, including the risks described under “Risk Factors,”
in this Annual Report and in other documents which we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Any
forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the risk factors discussed throughout this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. Some of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from
estimates or projections contained in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

●

our
ability to raise funds for general corporate purposes and operations;

●

the
commercial feasibility and success of our technology and products;

●

our
ability to recruit qualified management and technical personnel; and

●

government
or quasi-government actions with respect to the cannabis industry;

The
foregoing list sets forth some, but not all, of the factors that could affect our ability to achieve results described in any
forward-looking statements. You should read this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents that we reference herein and have
filed as exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may
be materially different from what we expect. You should assume that the information appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K is accurate as of the date hereof. Because the risk factors referred to on page 13 of Annual Report on Form 10-K, could
cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on
our behalf, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Further, any forward-looking statement
speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect
events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New
factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict which factors will arise. In addition, we cannot
assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual
results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. We qualify all of the information presented
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and particularly our forward-looking statements, by these cautionary statements.

ITEM
1. BUSINESS

Unless
the context requires otherwise, the words “Arias,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,”
refer to Arias Intel Corp. and, where appropriate, our subsidiaries. We
have proprietary rights, including the right to use, trademarks used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K which are important to
our business, including SportXction. Solely for convenience, the trademarks and trade
names in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are referred to without the ® and TM symbols, but such references
should not be construed as any indicator that their respective owners will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable
law, their rights thereto. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are
the property of their respective owners.

Overview

Arias
Intel Corp. (the “Company”) is a digital media platform for technology, media
and gaming, which includes mobile gaming, on-demand delivery, digital media, and e-commerce, with a focus on the cannabis
industry and emerging growth sectors. The Company is an early-stage company and has not generated any revenue as of March 31,
2018. The Company plans to generate revenue primarily through in-app purchases, service
fees, and cross-channel advertising.

The
Company is developing its platform as a way for niche
cannabis-related companies, as well as mainstream advertisers to reach a pro-cannabis audience. We believe our platform solves
the communication challenge between pro-legalization supporters of medical and therapeutic cannabis and advertisers that want
to reach this growing demographic.

-3-

To
reach the pro-cannabis and gaming target audience, our digital media platform (the “Platform”) currently consists
of the following three elements:

(1)

Hemp
Inc– Hemp Inc (the “Game”)
is a business strategy, role playing, mobile gaming app similar to FarmVille or
Clash Royale and allows mobile gamers to develop, grow and dispense virtual cannabis
and interact with celebrities and advertisers’ “brands” within the
game. It is a strategy-based game that mimics the real-life cannabis culture, and
we intend for it to serve as a platform for advertising and e-commerce sales.

The
development team for the Game is led by Daniel Hammett, the former Executive Vice President of Activision (Nasdaq:
ATVI). Mr. Hammett was responsible for Activision’s intellectual property development and product launches, including
the development of iconic games such as Call of Duty, Big Game Hunter, Tony Hawk, Spiderman
and Toy Story. Mr. Hammett has put together a team of developers with experience at gaming and technology
companies such as Activision, Sega, MiniClip and DropBox.

Mr.
Hammett serves on our board of directors, and he is also the president of HKA Digital
Ltd. (“HKA”), the Game developer. The Game is currently available for download
on the iTunes App Store. We intend to launch an updated version of the Game for iPhones,
and we anticipate that such updated version of the Game may be available
on the Google Play Store for Android phones by the end of 2018, subject to available
funding. We intend that the Game will be a sales platform that uses a viral marketing
strategy to take advantage of the social media reach of the celebrities in the Game and
the popularity of the cannabis legalization movement. We believe this will allow the
Game to build its user base with a low acquisition cost. HKA has been able to demonstrate
that users can initiate in-app purchases which we believe will serve as a revenue stream
for the Company. To date, we have not recognized any revenue from the Game.

The
objective of the Game is to set up and grow a legal cannabis business in a virtual world,
using various business strategies to create a prosperous and sustainable environment
which allows for growth. Users are able to establish a grow operation and dispensary,
hire staff, purchase strains of cannabis to grow, tools, ancillary products and real
estate for the cultivation and sale of cannabis and related products and engage in various
business strategies to expand their operations. The Game also promotes social awareness
of the benefits of medical cannabis and legalization thereof. The Game also has
celebrity avatars, which allows the celebrities to receive a revenue share
for referring players to the Game which we believe will assist us in
deriving revenue by driving additional traffic to the Game. Celebrities
include recognized names such as Jimi Hendrix, Cypress Hill and Melisa Etheridge, as
well as organizations such as the National Organization of the Reform of Marijuana Laws,
Freedom Leaf and High Times Magazine. The Company hopes that these celebrities will promote
the Game through their social media channels, including Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and
Instagram. The Company anticipates that celebrity relationships will create tie-ins to
sell merchandise, concert tickets and other celebrity endorsed products through an e-commerce
channel through the Game.

The
Game’s primary target audience is enthusiasts of action-adventure and business
strategy oriented mobile games, with an affinity toward the legalization of medical and
recreational/therapeutic cannabis which intends to be males between the ages
of 17 and 35. According to a March 2016 report from digital commerce analyst,
Slice Intelligence, in the U.S., people who spent money on mobile games in
2015 paid an average of $87 for in-app purchases in free-to-play mobile games.
This information is based upon more than 4 million purchasers of digital products
in the U.S. The report also states that 10% of mobile users account for 90% of revenue
from in-app purchases. We believe this signifies a highly engaged audience that
may provide the Company with revenue opportunities from the Game.

-4-

Both
the mobile gaming market and the cannabis market are expected to experience double-digit compound annual growth rates over
the next several years. According to Newzoo Global Games Market Report, in 2018 mobile games are expected to generate
$70.3 billion in revenues and $100 billion by 2021. According to a September 2016 article published by Bloomberg, the
legal cannabis industry is expected to be valued at $50 billion by 2026, growing to more than eight times its
current size, as lawful cannabis purveyors gain new customers and users from the illicit cannabis market.

(2)

Ufly
– Ufly is an on-demand delivery service
which is similar to an UberEATS-style delivery app model, providing on-demand legal
medical cannabis to qualified patients and recreational users in states where cannabis
is legal. We intend for the logistics-based app to connect an authorized
user to a selection of local, legal cannabis dispensaries in designated cities using
their smartphone to select and place orders and have such orders delivered to their door.
Ufly is available for download on the iTunes App Store. We have not recognized
any revenue from Ufly to date.

(3)

SportXction®
– SportXction was originally
developed as
a real-time interactive software system which allowed a user to make play-by-play wagers
on a sporting event while the event was in progress. SportXction is not currently
available for download and requires additional development for mobile applications. We
intend for the SportXction to allow wagering to be conducted online while
viewing a live sporting event and accept wagers not only on the outcome of the sporting
event, but also on discrete parts of the event and on specific in-game situations for
sports including, but not limited to, soccer, football, baseball, basketball,
golf, tennis, rugby and cricket.

We
anticipate wagers
offered through SportXction to be primarily oriented to short-term action,
for example, is the penalty kick successful, is the next play a run or a pass, is the
next pitch a ball or a strike, does the shooter make two foul shots, points scored in
a quarter and additional short-term actions. The wagers have odds associated with
them, which relate to the probable outcome of the proposition being wagered upon, and
the odds are adjusted in real-time to balance the betting using algorithms and artificial
intelligence software to reflect user sentiment, as derived from their betting patterns.

Our
primary target audience is socially-active Millennials between the ages of 18 and 33 and Generation X’ers
between the ages 34 of 50 who own a smartphone and use cannabis legally, either medically or recreationally. This
demographic tends to be a regular consumer of games, apps, music, movies and online content and is comfortable with making
purchases online and through mobile applications. According to the 2010 U.S. Census Bureau and the 2014 Pew Research Study,
it is estimated that approximately 68%, or 56.4 million of the 83 million Millennials and 52%, or 32.7 million of the
63 million Generation X’ers favor cannabis legalization. Our digital media platforms are focused on bridging the gap between
brand conscious advertisers and the approximately 89 million cannabis legalization supporters in this target audience.

We
believe that by combining three of the fastest growing business sectors – cannabis, mobile gaming and the on-demand economy,
together with our world-class development team led by the former Executive Vice President of Activision and our
promotional activities, our Platform may become a premiere advertising medium in the cannabis industry.

According
to the results of a February 2017 Quinnipiac Poll, 93% of Americans supported regulating the medicinal use of cannabis,
59% supported regulating the adult-use of cannabis and 71% of Americans were opposed to federal government interference with state
marijuana programs.

From
an app user or gamer perspective, we believe the Platform eliminates the stigma of cannabis as an illicit drug and provides an
affinity driven ecosystem that attracts, engages and inspires members through mobile gaming, digital media and e-commerce,
while advancing a cause such gamers already support.

-5-

From
an advertiser perspective, we believe the Platform provides a brand-safe environment which is able to reach a large, self-identified,
socially active, web-savvy, niche audience with targeted advertisements uniquely matched to their social engagement habits.

Popular
social media platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Google+ do not provide advertisers the ability
to tap into this segmented market due to restrictive protocols found within their terms of service. By leveraging the Platform,
we believe advertisers may have the ability to gain crucial behavioral analytics across several media platforms in order
to dramatically increase their marketing thereby increase their brand’s reach and operational outcomes.

We
anticipate that the Platform will create cross-advertising opportunities. In addition to attracting new users and gamers, different
elements of the Platform may provide unique user insights and highly actionable intelligence that can better align an advertiser’s
products and solutions directly with a more inclined prospect. Whether to expand a user’s knowledge, enjoy an entertaining
mobile game or the convenience of on-demand delivery and ecommerce, we believe that the Platform may empower users and
advertisers alike to connect in the biggest social movement since the repeal of prohibition.

Revenue
Model

Our
apps that are available are a “freemium”
download and have a three-pronged model to generate revenue:

(1)

In-app
micro-transactions, for example, gamers offered in-game characters, accessories and dead-drops for enhanced game play
for a small payment, typically $0.99 to $9.99;

(2)

Branding
and ad-placement within the game; and

(3)

Technologies
fees and in-app e-commerce purchases.

The
Game is currently available for download on the iTune App Store, and although the
Game has generated limited revenue to date while in development, we have not recognized any revenue and will not recognize
any such revenue until HKA, the developer, completes and is funded for the buildout and upgrades to specifications
agreed to by the parties. As of March 31, 2018, we have paid HKA a total of $1,394,400 in development fees. The total value of
the development agreement is $2,000,000 based upon certain development parameters and ongoing scope of work. Although
our cash flow has limited further development, subject to receiving funding, we intend to continue development of
the Game during the 2019 fiscal year, subject to available funding, including publishing the Game on the Google Play
platform for Android phones and full functionality of the Game which includes, among other things, additional Game levels and
accessories for purchase in the Game.

The
Ufly on-demand delivery app is available for download on iTunes and we have been able demonstrate that users can search
and select products, select delivery locations and initiate in-app purchases. To date, we have not recognized any revenue from
Ufly; however, we anticipate revenues by the -end of 2018, subject to available funding. We may consider licensing or selling
the Ufly technology.

SportXction
is not currently available for download and requires additional development for mobile applications,
subject to available funding. In July 2016, we acquired intellectual property rights and gaming software technology from Interactive
Systems Worldwide, Inc. (“ISWI”), including rights to its SportXction (the “IP Assets”). According
to ISWI, the technology has been used in the U.S., as well as licensed in Europe, Asia and South America and has supported wagers
on over 2,800 annual sporting events worldwide. We believe this technology has multiple mobile applications. We estimate the IP
Assets may hold value for sale in-part or in-whole to a third party, as well as pursuing opportunities for development or licensing.
To date, we have not recognized any revenue from SportXction. We may consider licensing or selling the SportXction technology.

We
are exploring opportunities to expand a suite of mobile games and apps that may or may not be cannabis-related, but target similar
audience demographics as the app in our Platform. We may explore these opportunities through the acquisition of operating
companies, asset purchases, joint ventures or internal development.

-6-

Advertising

We
estimate our advertising services may offer creative ways for marketers and advertisers to reach and engage with our audience.
The goal of the engagement-based advertising is to enhance the user or gamer experience while delivering real value to advertisers,
including:

●

Branded
goods and celebrity sponsorships that integrate relevant advertising and messaging within the game-play and social media platforms;

●

Engagement
ads, product placement and offers in which game players and app users engage with advertisers or sign up for third-party promotions;
and

●

Display
ads on the Platform with online content, including banner advertisements.

Management
anticipates reaching a large base of medical and recreational cannabis users in cannabis-legal markets through its
integrated Platform. Much like Facebook’s model, management believes that it will be easier to on-board advertisers and
charge higher fees once the Platform has reached a large enough user base and has the metrics to show user analytics of
a targeted audience.

Research
and Development

Management
believes that continued investment in enhancing existing game-play and digital media with upgrades and developing new digital
offerings, software development tools and code modification will be crucial to the Company’s success. We currently
have access to a team of contract software developers that can manage our existing offerings and research future enhancements.

Intellectual
Property

We
have entered into a licensing agreement with HKA for the mobile gaming software of “Hemp Inc.” Our business
is significantly based upon the creation, acquisition, use and protection of our intellectual property rights. Some
of this intellectual property is in the form of software code, development tools and trade secrets that we use to develop our
digital content and games and enable them to run properly on multiple platforms. Other intellectual property we utilize includes
product and celebrity names and audio-visual elements, including graphics, music, story lines and interface design.

Some
of our intellectual property has been developed
by us while other intellectual property rights such as the IP Assets have been acquired by us. In addition, we license
some of our intellectual property rights through agreements with third-parties. Our licenses typically limit our use of such
intellectual property to specific uses for a specific duration.

We
protect our intellectual property rights by relying upon federal, state and common law protections, as well as contractual
restrictions. We seek intellectual property protection and trademark protection as appropriate to cover our inventions.
We restrict access to proprietary technology by entering into confidentiality agreements with certain of our independent contractors,
consultants and developers. In addition, we also rely on a combination of trade secret, copyright, trademark, trade dress
and domain names to protect our intellectual property.

Competition

We
face significant competition in all aspects of our business. Specifically, we compete for the leisure time, attention and
discretionary spending of our users and gamers within our Platform with other social game and digital media developers on the
basis of a number of factors, including, but not limited to, user appeal, quality of experience, brand awareness and reputation,
access to distribution channels and pricing of our products.

The
mobile game and app sector is characterized by frequent product introductions, rapidly emerging mobile platforms, new technologies
and new mobile application storefronts.

Our
competitors include mobiles games and apps including, but not limited to, mobile games such as Hempire, Wiz Khalida’s Weed
Farm, CannaFarm and Ganja Farm, delivery and dispensary apps such as Eaze, WeedMaps and Leafly, as well as casino and gaming apps,
such as Royal Panda, Jackpot City, Vegas Paradise, DraftKings and FanDuel. In addition, our users may play games or use apps on
personal computers and consoles rather than mobile games and apps, some of which include social features that compete with our
games and apps. We believe our Game and apps will have a competitive advantage based on the ease of use and analytical
data that we intend to capture to create a better user experience based on user preferences.

Although
we believe there currently is no significant player in the cannabis digital media market,
the industry is evolving rapidly and is becoming increasingly competitive. Other developers of digital media and social games
could develop more compelling content that competes with our social games and adversely affects our ability to attract
and retain gamers. These competitors may have access to a larger affinity user base and may have significantly
greater financial, marketing, technical personnel and other resources than we do.

-7-

Government
Regulation

The
Company is subject to a number of foreign and domestic laws and regulations that affect companies conducting business on the Internet,
many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. In the United States and internationally,
laws relating to the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties are currently
being tested by a number of claims, including actions based on invasion of privacy and other torts, unfair competition, copyright
and trademark infringement, and other theories based on the nature and content of the materials searched, the ads posted, or the
content provided by users. Any court ruling or other governmental action that imposes liability on providers of online services
for the activities of their users and other third parties could harm our business. We are potentially subject to a number of foreign
and domestic laws and regulations that affect the offering of certain types of content, such as that which depicts violence or
mature content, many of which are ill defined, still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business or
expose us to liability.

In
addition, rising concern about the use of social networking technologies for illegal conduct, such as the unauthorized dissemination
of national security information, money laundering or supporting terrorist activities may in the future produce legislation or
other governmental action that could require changes to our games or restrict or impose additional costs upon the conduct of our
business.

We
may also offer our users and gamers the opportunity to participate in various types of sweepstakes, giveaways and other
promotional opportunities. We are subject to laws in a number of jurisdictions concerning the operation and offering of such
activities, many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. Any court ruling or
other governmental action that imposes liability on providers of online services could result in criminal or civil liability and
could harm our business.

In
the area of information security and data protection, many states have passed laws requiring notification to users when there
is a security breach for personal data, such as the 2002 amendment to California’s Information Practices Act, or requiring
the adoption of minimum information security standards that are often vaguely defined and difficult to implement. The costs of
compliance with these laws may increase in the future as a result of changes in interpretation. Furthermore, any failure on our
part to comply with these laws may subject us to significant liabilities.

We
are also subject to federal, state and foreign laws regarding privacy and protection of player data, including the collection
of data from minors. Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service are posted in our app, and describe our practices
concerning the use, transmission and disclosure of player data. Any failure by us to comply with our posted privacy policy or
privacy related laws and regulations could result in proceedings against us by governmental authorities or others, which could
harm our business. In addition, the interpretation of many data protection laws, and their application to the Internet is unclear
and in a state of flux.

Marijuana
is a categorized as a Schedule I controlled substance by the Drug Enforcement Agency and the United States Department of Justice
and is illegal to grow, possess and consume under Federal law. However, 30 states have passed state laws that permit doctors to
recommend cannabis for medical-use and eight of those states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws that regulate the
adult-use of cannabis for any reason. Because doctors are prohibited from prescribing a Schedule I controlled substance, the passage
of a state medical marijuana does not necessarily guarantee the implementation of a regulated, commercial system through which
patients can purchase cannabis products. This has created an unpredictable business-environment for dispensaries and collectives
that operate under certain state laws but in violation of Federal law.

-8-

Cole
Memo

On
August 29, 2013, United States Deputy Attorney General James Cole issued the Cole Memo to United States attorneys guiding
them to prioritize enforcement of Federal law away from the cannabis industry operating as permitted under certain state laws,
so long as:

●

cannabis
is not being distributed to minors and dispensaries are not located around schools and public buildings;

●

the
proceeds from sales are not going to gangs, cartels or criminal enterprises;

●

cannabis
grown in states where it is legal is not being diverted to other states;

●

cannabis-related
businesses are not being used as a cover for sales of other illegal drugs or illegal activity;

●

there
is not any violence or use of firearms in the cultivation and sale of marijuana;

●

there
is strict enforcement of drugged-driving laws and adequate prevention of adverse health consequences; and

●

cannabis
is not grown, used, or possessed on Federal properties.

The
Cole Memo was a guide for United States attorneys and did not alter in any way the Department of Justice’s authority to
enforce Federal law, including Federal laws relating to cannabis, regardless of state law. As described below, as a result of
the issuance of the Sessions Memo by the Department of Justice on January 4, 2018, the Cole memo was rescinded. We cannot provide
assurance that our actions were, are or will be in compliance with the Cole Memo, the Sessions Memo or any other laws or regulations
that currently exist or may be amended or adopted in the future.

Rohrabacher-Farr
Amendment

On
December 16, 2014, H.R. 83 - Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 was enacted and included a provision
known as the “Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment” which states:

None
of the funds made available in this Act to the Department of Justice may be used, with respect to the States of Alaska, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode
Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin, to prevent such States from implementing their own
State laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of medical marijuana.

The
Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment would appear to protect the right of the states to determine their own laws on medical cannabis use;
however, the actual effects of the amendment are still unclear. The Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment did not remove the federal ban
on medical cannabis and cannabis remains regulated as a Schedule I controlled substance. Further, the United States Department
of Justice has interpreted the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment as only preventing federal action that prevents states from creating
and implementing cannabis laws - not against the individuals or businesses that actually carry out cannabis laws – and has
continued to sporadically initiate enforcement actions against individuals or businesses participating in the cannabis industry
despite such participation being regulated under state law. Whether this interpretation is appropriate is still being litigated,
and, while an initial district court decision has not supported the Department of Justice’s interpretation, such decision
is currently under appellate review. In addition, no matter what the interpretation is adopted by the courts, there is no question
that the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment does not protect any party not in full compliance with state medicinal cannabis laws.

The
Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment represents one of the first times in recent history that Congress has taken action indicating support
of medical cannabis. The Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment was renewed by Congress in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and is in effect until
September 30, 2018.

Sessions
Memo

On
January 4, 2018, Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions, III issued a memo on federal marijuana enforcement policy announcing
a return to the rule of law and the rescission of previous nationwide guidance by the Department of Justice (including, but not
limited to, the Cole Memo). In the memorandum, Attorney General Jefferson Sessions directs all U.S. attorneys to enforce the laws
enacted by Congress and to follow well established principles when pursuing prosecutions related to marijuana activities. These
principles include weighing all relevant considerations, including federal law enforcement priorities set by the Attorney General,
the seriousness of the crime, the deterrent effect of criminal prosecution, and the cumulative impact of particular crimes on
the community. The effect of this memo is to shift federal policy from a hands-off approach adopted by the Obama administration
to permitting federal prosecutors across the country to determine how to prioritize resources to regulate marijuana possession,
distribution and cultivation in states where marijuana use is legal.

While
we do not directly harvest or distribute cannabis today, we still may be deemed to be violating federal law, or aiding and abetting
the violation of Federal law and may be irreparably harmed by a change in enforcement by the federal or state governments.

Additional
Government Regulations

We
are subject to general business regulations and laws as well as Federal and state regulations and laws specifically governing
the Internet and e-commerce. These regulations and laws cover among others, sweepstakes, taxation, tariffs, user privacy, data
protection, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, electronic contracts and other communications, consumer protection, broadband
residential Internet access and the characteristics and quality of services. Any noncompliance with the foregoing laws and regulations
may harm our business and results of operations.

-9-

Market

The
legal cannabis industry has evolved considerably over the past three to five years. According to an April 2015 Pew Research Center
report, 49% of Americans say they have tried cannabis, and 12% have tried it within the past year. According to the results of
a February 2017 Quinnipiac Poll, 93% of Americans supported regulating the medicinal use of cannabis, 59% supported regulating
the adult-use of cannabis and 71% of Americans were opposed to federal government interference with state marijuana programs.
Opinions have changed drastically since 1969, when Gallup reported that only 12% of the U.S. population favored legalizing cannabis
use compared to 64% in 2017.

As
people continue to support the legalization movement, legal
cannabis markets in the United States continue to expand. There are now thirty states, together with Guam, Puerto
Rico and Washington, D.C., with medical cannabis programs and eight of these states (Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts,
Nevada, Oregon and Washington) together with Washington, D.C. have also legalized cannabis for recreational use.

We
believe the market will continue to rapidly expand as states broaden the definition of the approved uses for cannabis (i.e. from
medicinal to recreational/therapeutic use) and additional states legalize cannabis for at least some purposes. Despite the fact
that the Federal Controlled Substances Act makes the use and possession of cannabis illegal on a national level, recent guidance
from the federal government suggests that it will continue to tolerate legalization at the state level, especially when backed
by strong and effective regulation. We believe it is significant that the current Congressional Spending Bill specifically prevents
the Justice Department from spending money to enforce the federal ban on growing or selling cannabis in states where cannabis
has been approved.

According
to an IBISWorld report, the cannabis industry is expected to achieve rapid growth over the next five years. We believe
the industry will continue to benefit from increasingly favorable attitudes towards medical cannabis-based treatments and applications
as acceptance and legitimacy of cannabis continues to grow.

Medical
Cannabis Market

The
last five years have seen a dramatic shift in public opinion on medical cannabis, which is reflected in the direction of individual
states toward legalization. The February 2017 Quinnipiac Poll reported 93% of Americans favor the use of legalized cannabis for
medical purposes. Thirty states together with Guam, Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., have enacted medical cannabis laws.
According to ProCon there are approximately 3.5 million registered patients within these states, and the five states
with the largest known current registered medical cannabis patient populations are: California, Michigan, Florida, Colorado and
Washington. An additional 17 states now recognize cannabis or cannabidiol derived products
for medical reasons in limited situations or as a legal defense; however, these programs are not deemed comprehensive medical
cannabis programs as adopted by the other 30 states.

-10-

Cannabis
has been used for medicinal purposes for thousands of years and based upon several studies has been deemed to be
an effective treatment for pain relief, inflammation and a number of other medical disorders. According to an IBISWorld report,
new medical research and changing public opinion have boosted industry growth.

Eight
states (Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oregon, Washington) together with Washington, D.C.
have legalized recreational cannabis. In November 2012, Colorado voters legalized recreational cannabis use. This history-changing
legislation created a window of opportunity for the commercialization and state taxation of a plant group that has, until recently,
been virtually untouchable and has set the wheels in motion for other states to follow. In July of 2014, Washington state
launched its recreational program and in November 2014 Oregon, Alaska and the Washington, D.C. voted to introduce
recreational programs commencing in 2015. In addition, in November 2016, California, Maine, Massachusetts, and Nevada
all passed ballot initiatives for the legalization of recreational cannabis. An October 2017 Gallup Poll survey indicated
that that 64% of Americans are in favor of legalizing cannabis.

The
U.S. Cannabis Market

In
a December 2015 cannabis industry research report published by Bank of America / Merrill Lynch, estimates of the
total market size for cannabis sales in the U.S. ranged from $33 billion to $100 billion. In addition, according
to the report total legal (medical and recreational) cannabis sales could reach $35 billion by 2020.

-11-

Another
recent cannabis industry research report from Ackrell Capital forecasts the potential growth of the overall legal cannabis consumer
market size to $100 billion by 2029 with over 50 million estimated users.

According
to an industry research and investment forum, the ArcView Group (“ArcView”), legal U.S. cannabis sales increased from
approximately $5.4 billion in 2015 to $6.7 billion in 2016 and were estimated to be $9.7 billion for 2017. This
annual gain was largely fueled by the growth in consumer sales, as additional states approved adult recreational cannabis use.
ArcView projects that legal cannabis sales will grow at an average rate of 28% per year and that by 2021 legal cannabis sales
could be $24.5 billion, which is over a fourfold increase compared to the 2015 sales.

According
to a September 2016 Cowen & Co. (“Cowen”) cannabis industry research report titled The
Cannabis Compendium: Cross-Sector Views on A Budding Industry, “Cannabis prohibition has been in place for 80+ years,
but the tides are clearly turning. Potential product applications range from recreational, to health & wellness, to therapeutic,
to pharmaceutical. A lack of robust science has proven problematic, given the plant’s many active ingredients (including
THC, the only psychotropic compound of 60+). Proponents point to cannabis’ wide use over thousands of years, skeptics advocate
for science, and opponents voice concern.” The Cowen report anticipates that the recreational
cannabis market will increase nine fold over the next ten years, assuming federal legalization. The report estimates
that there are over 32 million yearly cannabis users in the U.S. and close to 9 million daily users. With approximately $6 billion
in legal cannabis sales in 2016 (recreational and medial), the report anticipates the transitioning of the informal market and
capitalizing on growing incidence, higher per caps, and premiumization should drive this increase. The reports project
a 24% ten-year revenue compound annual growth rate, which the report states is hard to find in consumer staples, in particular
with a $50+ billion end-point.

According
to the government sponsored National Survey on Drug Use and Health (“NSDUH”), there were 19.8 million “current”
cannabis users in the U.S. in 2013, up from 14.5 million in 2007. These self-reported results may be conservative based on the
reluctance of respondents to admit to the use of an illegal substance in a government-sponsored survey. For example, an international
review found general population surveys underestimate alcohol consumption, sometimes by more than 50%. These studies suggest
that it may be appropriate to inflate the NSDUH-only consumption estimates by a factor of two. According to NSDUH, the
low and high industry sales are estimated to range from $36 billion to $72 billion. By comparison, U.S. beer market sales
last year were estimated at $102 billion, the U.S. cigarette market at $66 billion and the U.S. coffee market at $30 billion.

According
to a June 2015 article published by Forbes, it is estimated that for every $1 of legally sold cannabis an additional $2.60
of economic value enters the American economy through ancillary businesses. The cannabis market differs from other emerging markets
in that businesses typically expend considerable resources to stimulate demand, while in the cannabis industry significant demand
already exists. The demand continues to outpace legal supply due to limitations in state regulations, federal drug, tax and banking
laws, and lack of interstate trade.

Employees

We
do not have any employees and utilize independent contractors and consultants as needed. We believe we have favorable relations
with our independent contractors and consultants.

Corporate
History

The
Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on February 27, 2013 as “American Riding Tours, Inc.”
Effective July 22, 2016, the Company changed its name from “American Riding Tours, Inc.” to “First Harvest Corp.”
Effective December 1, 2017, the Company changed its name from “First Harvest Corp.” to “Arias Intel Corp.”
Prior to the reverse acquisition described below, the Company did not have any significant assets or operations.

-12-

On
February 10, 2017 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into and closed an agreement and plan of merger and reorganization
(the “Merger Agreement”), with CV Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Acquisition
Corp.”), and Cannavoices, Inc. (“Cannavoices”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on the Closing Date (i) Acquisition
Corp. merged with and into Cannavoices, such that Cannavoices, the surviving corporation, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Company, and (ii) the Company issued an aggregate of 23,267,231 shares of common stock to the shareholders of Cannavoices,
representing approximately 97.7% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock, following the Closing Date, in
consideration for the cancellation of all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Cannavoices.

The
sole officer, one of the directors and, prior to closing of the Merger Agreement, the largest stockholder of Cannavoices was Kevin
Gillespie, the Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman of the Board and largest stockholder of the Company.

Cannavoices
was incorporated on June 5, 2015 as a Florida corporation. On the Closing Date, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Cannavoices
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The acquisition of Cannavoices is treated as a reverse acquisition, and the business
of Cannavoices became the business of the Company. At the time of the reverse recapitalization, the Company was not engaged in
any active business.

The
consolidated financial statements of the Company are those of Arias Intel Corp. and of the consolidated entities from the Closing
Date and subsequent periods.

Effective
September 23, 2016, we effected a one-for-ten reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock. All the relevant
information relating to number of shares and per share information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and consolidated
financial statements has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split for all periods presented.

ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS

An
investment in the Company’s securities involves a high degree of risk. This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains the risks
applicable to an investment in our securities. The risks and uncertainties we have described are not the only ones we face. Additional
risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our operations. The occurrence
of any of these known or unknown risks might cause you to lose all or part of your investment in the offered securities. In determining
whether to purchase the Company’s securities, you should carefully consider all of the material risks described below, together
with the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We
have a limited operating history and a history of operating losses and face many of the risks and difficulties frequently encountered
by an early stage company.

We
were formed in June 2015 and have a limited operating and performance history. Therefore, there is limited historical financial
information upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. Our prospects must be considered in light of the uncertainties,
risks, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stages of operations. We have generated net
losses since we began operations, including $10,219,920 and $4,535,060 for the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. The amount
of future losses and when, if ever, we will achieve profitability are uncertain. To date, our efforts have been focused primarily
on the development and marketing of our platforms, development of relationships with advertisers, creation of intellectual
property and acquisition of licensed properties.

Our future success will depend
on our ability to compete for the leisure time, attention and discretionary spending of our players and customers and to maintain
our relationships with advertisers in our target industry. This will require a sustained marketing effort and acceptance
of our Platform, the development of relationships with advertisers in our target industry and our ability to maintain
and protect our intellectual property rights.

-13-

We
will need to secure additional financing.

We
anticipate that we will require additional funds for our operations. If we are not successful in securing additional financing,
we may be unable to execute our business strategy, which could result in curtailment of our operations. We may have to pursue
selling or licensing our intellectual technology in-part or in-whole to pay for ongoing operations.

Our
ability to raise additional capital is uncertain and dependent on numerous factors beyond our control including, but not limited
to, economic conditions and availability or lack of availability of capital. We may also be restricted by the terms of the EMA
and Auctus settlement agreements and/or Geneva Roth Series A Preferred Stock financing.

If we
cannot raise capital as needed and on acceptable terms, we may not be able to, among other things:

●

develop
or enhance our Game or Ufly mobile applications;

●

continue
to expand our development, sales and marketing teams;

●

acquire
complementary technologies, products or businesses;

●

expand
our global operations;

●

hire,
train and retain employees; and

●

respond
to competitive pressures or unanticipated working capital requirements.

To
the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders’
interests may be materially diluted, and the terms of such securities could include liquidation or other preferences that adversely
affect their rights as common stockholders. Debt financing and preferred equity financing, if available, may involve restrictive
covenants that limit our ability to take specified actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or
declaring dividends.

We
received a report from our independent registered public accounting firm with an explanatory paragraph for the year ended March
31, 2018 with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern. The existence of such a report may adversely affect our stock
price and our ability to raise capital.

In
their report dated July 13, 2018, our independent registered public accounting firm expressed substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern as we have not generated revenue and incurred a net loss of $10,219,920 as of March 31,
2018. At March 31, 2018, we had an accumulated deficit of $17,299,170 and expect to continue incurring net losses for the
near future. Furthermore, if we were forced to liquidate our assets, the amount realized could be substantially lower than the
carrying value of these assets. Our ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our ability to obtain necessary funding
from outside sources, including obtaining additional funding from the sale of our securities or obtaining loans from various financial
institutions or lenders where possible. Our continued net operating losses increase the difficulty in meeting such goals and there
can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful.

If
the Platform fails to gain market acceptance, we may not have sufficient capital to pay our expenses and to continue to operate.

Our
ultimate success depends on generating revenues from the Platform. We may not achieve and sustain sufficient market acceptance
of the Platform to generate sufficient revenues, if at all, to cover our costs and allow us to become profitable or even
continue to operate.

We
may be unable to successfully develop our business.

There
can be no assurance that our business strategies will lead to profits. We face risks and uncertainties relating to our ability
to successfully implement our strategies of creating and maintaining relationships with advertisers in our target industry, and
capturing the leisure time, attention and discretionary spending of our players and customers. Despite our early entry into the
cannabis digital media market, we do not know how successfully we will be able to compete with other mobile game developers
and platforms or whether we will be successful in the long or short term with engaging our target customers. We have an
unproven business model and operate in a competitive and evolving market. In particular, our business model is based on an expectation
that we will be able to be a profitable part of the community of those who support cannabis legalization, and that demand for
our role as a link between socially active supporters of cannabis legalization and brand-conscious advertisers will sustain itself
or increase.

-14-

If
we are unable to maintain a good relationship with advertising partners, our business will suffer.

We
plan to generate substantially all of our revenue through advertising partnerships and expect to continue to do so for
the foreseeable future. Any deterioration in relationships with advertising partners would harm our business.

If
we are unable to maintain relationships with celebrity players, our business will suffer.

We
plan to have a number of celebrities involved with the Platform, and we believe their involvement will help publicize our
Company and will be a source of attraction for new users. To the extent celebrity involvement with the Platform
declines, it will affect our ability to attract or retain registered users for our Platform which would harm our
business and results of operations.

We
may need to make greater investments than we originally planned in advertising and promotional activity in new markets to build
brand awareness.

We
may need to make greater investments than originally planned in advertising and promotional activity in order to build brand awareness.
Such additional investments may cause a strain on our operation and management, which may adversely affect our business.

We
operate in a new and rapidly changing niche in the online gaming and advertising industry, which makes it difficult to evaluate
our business.

The
cannabis digital media niche, on which our business model is founded, is a new and rapidly evolving niche. The growth of
the niche and the level of demand and market acceptance of the Platform are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. Our future
operating results will depend on numerous factors affecting the cannabis digital media niche, many of which are beyond our control,
including, but not limited to:

●

Continued
worldwide growth of a community of cannabis legalization supporters, which may be affected in ways we cannot predict by changes
in or discussions surrounding government regulation of cannabis;

●

Changes
in consumer demographics and public tastes and preferences;

●

The
availability and popularity of other forms of entertainment;

●

The
worldwide growth of personal computer, broadband Internet and mobile device users, and the rate of any such growth; and

Our
ability to plan for development of our Platform, including our approach to marketing and promotional activities, will be significantly
affected by our ability to anticipate and adapt to rapid changes in the consumer preferences. New and different types of
entertainment and delivery channels may increase in popularity at the expense of our Platform. A decline in the popularity of
the cannabis legalization movement, or of mobile gaming as a form of entertainment and community building, would have a material
adverse effect upon our business and prospects.

The
mobile game and application development industry is intensely competitive. We face competition from a number of companies, some
of which may have greater financial, marketing, technical, personnel and other resources than us.

Competition
among web and mobile game developers is intense. We compete on the basis of user appeal, quality of experience, brand awareness
and reputation, access to distribution channels and pricing of our products. There are a number of established, well-financed
companies producing game content that will potentially compete with our Platform. In addition, some of our competitors
may have access to greater financial, marketing, technical, personnel and other resources than we do and as a result may
be better positioned to compete in the marketplace.

-15-

New
Platform features or changes to existing Platform features could fail to attract new users, retain existing users or generate
revenue.

Our
business strategy is dependent on our ability to develop our Platform features to attract new users, while retaining existing
ones. Changes in user behavior or development of competing platforms may cause our users to switch to alternative platforms or
decrease their use of our Platform which may have a material adverse effect on our business. Additionally, any of the following
events may cause decreased use of our Platform:

●

Emergence
of competing platforms and applications;

●

Inability
to convince potential users to join our platform;

●

Inability
to convince celebrities to endorse our products;

●

Technical
issues of our Platform or in the cross-compatibility of multiple platforms;

●

Potential
securities breaches around our data;

●

A
rise in safety or privacy concerns; and

●

An
increase in the level of spam or undesired content on the network.

Government
or quasi-government actions with respect to the cannabis industry could result in our products and services being
unavailable in certain geographic regions which may harm our future growth.

Due
to our connections to the cannabis industry, governments and quasi-government agencies may ban or cause our network
or apps to become unavailable in certain regions and jurisdictions. This could greatly impair or prevent us from registering new
users in affected areas and prevent current users from accessing our network. In addition, government or quasi-government
action taken against our service providers or partners could cause our network to become unavailable for extended periods of time
which could have a material adverse effect upon our business.

Changes
in Amazon App Store, Apple App Store or Google Play Store policies could result in our mobile applications being de-listed. In
addition, our third party service providers may decline to provide services due to their policies, or cease to provide services
previously provided to us due to a change of policy.

Digital
distribution platforms may change their review policies and app enforcement guidelines to prohibit all social cannabis-related
applications. There can be no assurance that game and applications may not be removed from digital distribution networks for circumstances
outside of our control. For example, the Apple App Store is one of the largest content distribution channels in the world and
the gateway to effectively distribute our iOS applications to users who own iPhones and iPads. The Apple App Store review team
effectively operates as our iOS App’s regulator; they decide what guidelines iOS apps must operate under and how to enforce
such guidelines. The Apple guidelines related to cannabis-related apps are not published, enforcement of such guidelines is difficult
to predict, and the review and appeal processes are conducted without public oversight.

-16-

We
may not be able to adequately safeguard our intellectual property rights from unauthorized use, and we may become subject to claims
that we infringe on others’ intellectual property rights.

Our
business is significantly based on the creation, acquisition, use and protection of intellectual property. We protect our intellectual
property rights by relying on federal, state and common law protections, as well as contractual restrictions. We seek intellectual
property protection and trademark protection as appropriate covering development and inventions originating from us. We control
access to proprietary technology by entering into confidentiality agreements with certain of our independent contractors and consultants.
In addition to these arrangements, we also rely on a combination of trade secret, copyright, trademark, trade dress and domain
names to protect our intellectual property. These measures afford only limited protection and may not preclude competitors from
developing products or services similar or superior to ours. Moreover, the laws of certain foreign countries do not protect intellectual
property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.

Although
we implement protective measures and intend to defend our proprietary rights, our efforts may not be successful. From time to
time, we may be subject to litigation within the United States or abroad to enforce our issued or licensed patents, to
protect our trade secrets and know-how or to determine the enforceability, scope and validity of our proprietary rights and the
proprietary rights of others. Enforcing or defending our proprietary rights can involve complex factual and legal questions and
can be expensive, would require management’s attention and might not bring us timely or effective relief.

Furthermore,
third parties may assert that our products or processes infringe upon their intellectual property rights. Although there are no
pending or threatened intellectual property lawsuits against us, we may face litigation or infringement claims in the future.
Infringement claims could result in substantial judgments, and could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources
even if we ultimately prevail. A third party claiming infringement may also obtain an injunction or other equitable relief which
could effectively block our use of allegedly infringing intellectual property. Although we may seek licenses from third parties
covering intellectual property that we are allegedly infringing, we may not be able to obtain any such licenses on acceptable
terms and conditions, if at all.

If
we do not effectively manage changes in our business, these changes could place a significant strain on our management and operations.

Our
ability to grow successfully requires that we have an effective planning and management process. The expansion and growth of our
business could place a significant strain on our management systems, infrastructure and other resources. To manage our growth
successfully, we must continue to improve and expand our systems and infrastructure in a timely and efficient manner. Our controls,
systems, procedures and resources may not be adequate to support a changing and growing company. If our management fails to respond
effectively to changes and growth in our business, including acquisitions, this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Damage
to our reputation or lack of acceptance of our brand in existing and new markets could negatively impact our business, financial
condition and results of operations.

We
intend to build a strong reputation for the quality of our technology, and we must protect and grow the value of our brand to
be successful. Any incident that erodes consumer affinity for our brand including, but not limited to, software malfunctions,
could significantly reduce our brand value and damage our business. If consumers perceive or experience a reduction in quality,
or in any way believe we fail to deliver a consistently positive experience, our brand value could suffer and our business may
be adversely affected.

We
will rely on our computer systems and network infrastructure across our operations. Our operations depend upon our ability to
protect our computer equipment and systems against damage from physical theft, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure or
other catastrophic events, as well as from internal and external security breaches, viruses, worms and other disruptive problems.
Any damage or failure of our computer systems or network infrastructure that causes an interruption in our operations could have
a material adverse effect on our business and subject us to litigation or actions by regulatory authorities.

-17-

A
material breach in security relating to our information systems and regulation related to such breaches could adversely affect
us.

Information
security risks have generally increased in recent years, in part because of the proliferation of new technologies and the use
of the Internet, and the increased sophistication and activity of organized crime, hackers, terrorists, activists, cybercriminals
and other external parties, some of which may be linked to terrorist organizations or hostile foreign governments. For example,
a cybercriminal could use cybersecurity threats to gain access to sensitive information about another company or to alter or disrupt
news or information to be distributed by PR Newswire. Cybersecurity attacks are becoming more sophisticated and include malicious
software, ransomware, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions
in critical systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and corruption of data, substantially
damaging our reputation. Any person who circumvents our security measures could steal proprietary or confidential customer information
or cause interruptions in our operations. We incur costs with respect to protecting against security breaches, and may incur significant
additional costs to alleviate problems caused by any breaches. Our failure to prevent security breaches, or well-publicized security
breaches affecting the Internet in general, could significantly harm our reputation and business and financial results.

Any
new or changes made to laws, regulations, rules or other industry standards affecting our business may have an adverse impact
on our financial results.

We
are subject to a number of foreign and domestic laws and regulations that affect companies conducting business on the Internet,
many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. In the United States and internationally,
laws relating to the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties are currently
being tested by a number of claims, including actions based on invasion of privacy and other torts, unfair competition, copyright
and trademark infringement, and other theories based on the nature and content of the materials searched, the ads posted, or the
content provided by users. Any court ruling or other governmental action that imposes liability on providers of online services
for the activities of their users and other third parties could harm our business. We are potentially subject to a number of foreign
and domestic laws and regulations that affect the offering of certain types of content, such as that which depicts violence, many
of which are ill defined, still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business or expose us to liability.

In
addition, rising concern about the use of social networking technologies for illegal conduct, such as the unauthorized dissemination
of national security information, money laundering or supporting terrorist activities may in the future produce legislation or
other governmental action that could require changes to our games or restrict or impose additional costs upon the conduct of our
business.

We
also offer our players the opportunity to participate in various types of sweepstakes, giveaways and other promotional
opportunities. We are subject to laws in a number of jurisdictions concerning the operation and offering of such activities,
many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. Any court ruling or other governmental
action that imposes liability on providers of online services could result in criminal or civil liability and could harm our business.

In
the area of information security and data protection, many states have passed laws requiring notification to users when there
is a security breach for personal data, such as the 2002 amendment to California’s Information Practices Act, or requiring
the adoption of minimum information security standards that are often vaguely defined and difficult to implement. The costs of
compliance with these laws may increase in the future as a result of changes in interpretation. Furthermore, any failure on our
part to comply with these laws may subject us to significant liabilities.

We
are also subject to federal, state and foreign laws regarding privacy and protection of player data, including the collection
of data from minors. Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service are posted in our apps and describe our practices
concerning the use, transmission and disclosure of player data. Any failure by us to comply with our posted privacy policy or
privacy related laws and regulations could result in proceedings against us by governmental authorities or others, which could
harm our business. In addition, the interpretation of many data protection laws, and their application to the Internet is unclear
and in a state of flux.

Our
success will be dependent on our ability to attract and retain key personnel.

We
believe our success depends on the continued service of our key technical and management personnel, particularly our Chief
Executive Officer, Kevin Gillespie, and upon our ability to attract and retain qualified employees, independent contractors
and consultants, particularly highly skilled game designers, product managers and engineers. The competition for technical personnel
is intense, and the loss of key personnel or the inability to hire such personnel when needed could have a material adverse impact
on our results of operation and financial condition. We also do not maintain any key man life insurance policies for any of
our employees.

Laws
and regulations affecting the cannabis industry are constantly changing, and this may affect our consumer base in ways that we
are unable to predict.

Local,
state and federal medical cannabis laws and regulations are broad in scope and subject to evolving interpretations. We cannot
predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications that may affect us, nor can we determine what
effect additional governmental regulations or administrative policies and procedures, when and if promulgated, could have on the
vitality of the cannabis legalization movement or the unification or popularity of the community in favor of legalization, the
members of which community form our anticipated consumer base and underpin our business model.

-18-

Cannabis
remains illegal under Federal law.

Despite
the development of a legal cannabis industry under the laws of certain states, these state laws legalizing medical and adult cannabis
use are in conflict with the Federal Controlled Substances Act, which classifies cannabis as a Schedule I controlled substance
and makes cannabis use and possession illegal on a national level. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that the Federal
government has the right to regulate and criminalize cannabis, even for medical purposes, and thus Federal law criminalizing the
use of cannabis preempts state laws that legalize its use. Although the prior administration determined that it was not an efficient
use of resources to direct Federal law enforcement agencies to prosecute those lawfully abiding by state laws allowing the use
and distribution of medical and recreational cannabis, on January 4, 2018, the current administration issued the Sessions Memo
announcing a return to the rule of law and the rescission of previous guidance documents. The Sessions Memo rescinds the Cole
Memo which was adopted by the Obama administration as a policy of non-interference with marijuana-friendly state laws. The Sessions
Memo shifts federal policy from a hands-off approach adopted by the Obama administration to permitting federal prosecutors across
the country to decide how to prioritize resources to regulate marijuana possession, distribution and cultivation in states where
marijuana use is legal. There can be no assurance that federal prosecutors will not prosecute and dedicate resources to regulate
marijuana possession, distribution and cultivation in states where marijuana use is legal which may cause states to reconsider
their legalization of marijuana which would have a detrimental effect on the marijuana industry. Any such change in state laws
based upon the Sessions Memo and the Federal government’s enforcement of Federal laws could cause significant financial
damage to us and our stockholders.

As
the possession and use of cannabis is illegal under the Federal Controlled Substances Act, we may be deemed to be aiding and abetting
illegal activities through the services and data that we provide to government regulators, dispensaries, cultivators and consumers.
As a result, we may be subject to enforcement actions by law enforcement authorities, which would materially and adversely affect
our business.

Under
Federal law, and more specifically the Federal Controlled Substances Act, the possession, use, cultivation, and transfer of cannabis
is illegal. Our business, including our UFly app, provides services to cannabis consumers and
business of possession, use, cultivation, and/or transfer of cannabis. As a result, law
enforcement authorities, in their attempt to regulate the illegal use of cannabis, may seek to bring an action or actions against
us, including, but not limited, to a claim of aiding and abetting another’s criminal activities. The Federal aiding and
abetting statute provides that anyone who “commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands,
induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.” 18 U.S.C. §2(a). As a result of such an action,
we may be forced to cease operations and our investors could lose their entire investment. Such an action would have a material
negative effect on our business and operations.

Federal
enforcement practices could change with respect to services provided to participants in the cannabis industry, which could adversely
impact us. If the Federal government were to expend its resources on enforcement actions against service providers in the cannabis
industry under guidance provided by the Sessions Memo, such actions could have a material adverse effect on our operations, our
customers, or the sales of our products.

It
is possible that due to the recent Sessions Memo our clients may discontinue the use of our services, our potential source of
customers may be reduced and our revenues may decline. Further, additional government disruption in the cannabis industry could
cause potential customers and users to be reluctant to use and advertise our products, which would be detrimental to the Company.
We cannot predict the impact of the Sessions Memo at this time nor can we predict the nature of any future laws, regulations,
interpretations or applications including the effect of such additional regulations or administrative policies and procedures,
when and if promulgated, could have on our business.

Due
to our involvement in the cannabis industry, we may have a difficult time obtaining insurance coverage for our business which
may expose us to additional risk and financial liabilities.

Insurance
that may otherwise be readily available, such as workers compensation, general liability, and directors and officers insurance,
is more expensive and difficult for us to obtain because we are a service provider to consumers and companies in the cannabis
industry. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain any insurance policies in the future or at costs that are
affordable to us due to the nature of our business operations. If we are unable to maintain insurance related to our Company and
business operations we will be exposed to additional risk and financial liabilities which may have a material adverse effect on
our business and financial condition.

We
have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which could result in material misstatements
in our financial statements.

We
have concluded that there are material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting due to our small size. Specifically,
we lack a functioning audit committee due to a lack of independent board members, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment
and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures and we do not have sufficient personnel in our accounting and
financial reporting functions. As a result, we are not able to achieve adequate segregation of duties and were not able to provide
for adequate review of the financial statements. These material weaknesses could result in our inability to detect or prevent,
on a timely basis, material misstatements of our financial statements.

-19-

A
material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there
is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected and corrected on a timely basis. The existence of this issue could adversely affect us, our reputation or investors’
perceptions of us. We plan to add independent members to the board of directors in the future, which we anticipate will have some
financial experience. In addition, as funds permit, we intend to hire accounting employees. We believe these measures will remediate
our control deficiencies. We cannot, at this time, estimate how long it will take before these measures are fully
implemented, and our measures may not prove to be successful in remediating these material weaknesses. If our remedial measures
are insufficient to address the material weaknesses, or if additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal
control over financial reporting are discovered or occur in the future, our consolidated financial statements may contain material
misstatements.

Risks
Related to Our Common Stock

There
is no active liquid trading market for our common stock.

Our
common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink Market under the symbol
“ASNT”. However, there has been minimal reported trading to date in the Company’s common stock, and we cannot
give any assurance that an active trading market will develop. As a result, investors may find it difficult to dispose of, or
to obtain accurate quotations of the price of our securities. This severely limits the liquidity of our common stock, and
may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. A limited market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling
shares of capital stock and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or assets by using shares of our common stock
as consideration.

If
an active market for our common stock develops, there is a significant risk that our stock price may fluctuate dramatically
in the future in response to any of the following factors, some of which are beyond our control:

●

variations
in our quarterly operating results;

●

announcements
that our revenue or income are below analysts’ expectations;

announcements
regarding regulatory developments with respect to the cannabis industry;

●

announcements
of new products by us or our competitors; and

●

our
issuance of additional securities, including debt or equity or a combination thereof, necessary to fund our operating expenses.

Due
to our connection to the cannabis industry, there can be no assurance that our common stock will ever be approved for listing
on a national securities exchange.

Currently,
shares of our common stock are quoted on the OTC Pink Market and are not traded or listed on any securities exchange. Even if
we desire to have our shares listed on a national securities exchange, the fact that our operations are associated with the use
of cannabis, the legal status of which is uncertain at the state and Federal level, may make any efforts to become listed on a
securities exchange more problematic. As a result we may never develop an active trading market for our securities which may limit
our investors’ ability to liquidate their investments

Our
common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”),
which may make it more difficult for stockholders to sell our common stock.

Rule
15g-9 establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that
has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain
exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person’s
account for transactions in penny stocks, and the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction,
setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In
order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain financial information
and investment experience objectives of the person, and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks
are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating
the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The
broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating
to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination,
and that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

-20-

Generally,
brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make
it more difficult for investors to dispose of the Company’s common stock if and when such shares are eligible for sale and
may cause a decline in the market value of its stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks
of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker
or dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an
investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information
for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Because
we became a public company by means of a reverse acquisition, we may not be able to attract the attention of brokerage firms.

Because
we became public through a “reverse acquisition,” with Cannavoices, securities analysts of brokerage firms
may not provide coverage of us since there is little incentive to brokerage firms to recommend the purchase of our common stock.
No assurance can be given that brokerage firms will want to conduct any secondary offerings on behalf of the Company in the future.

Applicable
regulatory requirements, including those contained in and issued under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, may make it difficult for
the Company to retain or attract qualified officers and directors, which could adversely affect the management of its business
and its ability to obtain or retain listing of its common stock.

We
may be unable to attract and retain those qualified officers, directors and members of board committees required to provide for
effective management because of the rules and regulations that govern publicly held companies, including, but not limited to,
certifications by principal executive officers. The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has resulted in the issuance of a series
of related rules and regulations and the strengthening of existing rules and regulations by the SEC, as well as the adoption of
new and more stringent rules by the stock exchanges. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these changes may deter
qualified individuals from accepting roles as directors and executive officers.

Further,
some of these changes heighten the requirements for board or committee membership, particularly with respect to an individual’s
independence from the corporation and level of experience in finance and accounting matters. We may have difficulty attracting
and retaining directors with the requisite qualifications. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified officers and directors,
the management of its business and its ability to obtain or retain listing of our shares of common stock on any stock exchange
(assuming we elect to seek and are successful in obtaining such listing) could be adversely affected.

If
we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or
detect fraud. Consequently, investors could lose confidence in our financial reporting and this may decrease the trading price
of our common stock.

We
must maintain effective internal controls to provide reliable financial reports and detect fraud. The Company has been assessing
its internal controls to identify areas that need improvement, and it is in the process of implementing changes to internal controls,
but has not yet completed implementing these changes. Failure to implement these changes to the Company’s internal controls
or any others that it identifies as necessary to maintain an effective system of internal controls could harm its operating results
and cause investors to lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information. Any such loss of confidence would
have a negative effect on the trading price of the Company’s stock.

Our
management controls a large block of our common stock that will allow them to control us.

As
of July 12, 2018, members of our management team beneficially own approximately 32.92% of our outstanding shares of common stock.
As a result, management may have the ability to control substantially all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval including:

-21-

●

Election or removal of our directors;

●

Amendments to our articles of
incorporation or bylaws; and

●

Adoption of measures that could
delay or prevent a change in control or impede a merger, takeover or other business combination involving us.

In
addition, management’s stock ownership may discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting
to obtain control of us, which in turn could reduce our stock price or prevent our stockholders from realizing a premium over
our stock price. Any additional investors will own a minority percentage of our common stock and will have minority voting rights.

We
do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

We
have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain our future earnings, if any, in order to reinvest
in the development and growth of our business and, therefore, do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable
future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board and will depend on our financial condition,
results of operations, capital requirements, and such other factors as our Board deems relevant. Investors should not purchase
our common stock expecting to receive cash dividends. Because we do not pay dividends, and there may be limited trading, investors
may not have any manner to liquidate or receive any payment on their investment. Therefore, our failure to pay dividends may cause
investors to not see any return on investment even if we are successful in our business operations. In addition, because we do
not pay dividends we may have trouble raising additional funds, which could affect our ability to expand our business operations.

Our
articles of incorporation allow for our Board of Directors to create new series of preferred stock without further approval
by our stockholders, which could adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock.

Our
Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) has the authority to fix and determine
the relative rights and preferences of preferred stock. Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 10,000,000 shares
of our preferred stock without further stockholder approval, 500,000 of which have been designated Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock. As a result, our Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to
holders the preferred right to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive dividend payments before dividends are distributed
to the holders of common stock and the right to the redemption of the shares, together with a premium, prior to the redemption
of our common stock. In addition, our Board could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that has greater
voting power than our common stock or that is convertible into our common stock, which could decrease the relative voting power
of our common stock or result in dilution to our existing stockholders. Although we have no present intention to issue any additional
shares of preferred stock or to create any additional series of preferred stock, we may issue such shares in the future.

ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM
2. PROPERTIES.

Our
corporate headquarters are located at 442 W, Kennedy Blvd., Suite 200, Tampa, Florida 33606. We lease approximately
3,750 square feet of office space for $7,233 per month until the end of the lease period which expires on July 31,
2019.

-22-

ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The
Company may be involved in legal proceedings, claims
and assessments arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties, and outcomes are not
predictable with assurance. There were no such matters that were deemed material to the financial statements as of March 31, 2018,
except the following:

Hit
Sum to Me, LLC

On
August 21, 2017, Hit Sum to Me, LLC (“HSTM”) filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit
in and for Okaloosa County, Florida (Filing #61355697) against Cannavoices and Kevin Gillespie. In the complaint HSTM indicates
that on or about April 27, 2016, Cannavoices entered into a Loan Agreement with HSTM and Cannavoices issued a promissory note
(the “HSTM Note”) in the principal amount of $600,000, which note is guaranteed by Kevin Gillespie and secured by
the Security Agreement for Tangible Personal Property whereby Cannavoices and Kevin Gillespie granted HSTM a first priority security
interest in all of the shares of common stock of Cannavoices (the “Cannavoices Stock”). The complaint alleges that
Cannavoices breached the terms of the HSTM Note by failing to repay the principal balance of such note by July 1, 2017 and that
as of July 1, 2017, Cannavoices is indebted to HSTM in the amount of $600,000 plus accrued and accruing interest, late changes
and costs of collection, including attorney’s fees. Pursuant to the complaint, HSTM requests (i) that a judgment be entered
against Cannavoices for all amounts owed under the HSTM Note, including damages for principal and interest due under the HSTM
Note, late fees and advances, (ii) that a judgment be entered against Kevin Gillespie for all amounts owed under the HSTM Note,
including damages for principal and interest due under the HSTM Note, late fees and advances, (iii) that a judgment be entered
against Kevin Gillespie for possession of the Cannavoices Stock and (iv) for reasonable attorneys’ fees. The Company filed
an answer to the complaint on September 6, 2017. The Company cannot determine at this time whether the court will agree with the
Company’s position, but the Company intends to litigate such allegations if a resolution cannot be agreed upon by the Company
and HSTM. This action is still pending.

Auctus
Fund, LLC

The
Company entered into Securities Purchase Agreements with Auctus Fund LLC (“Auctus”) for the sale of 12% convertible
promissory notes in aggregate principal amount of $259,500. On April 7, 2017, the Company issued Auctus a convertible promissory
note in the principal amount of $175,000 (the “Auctus April Note”) and on May 15, 2017, the Company issued Auctus
a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $84,500 (the “Auctus May Note” and together with the Auctus
April Note, the “Auctus Notes”). In connection with the issuance of the Auctus Notes, the Company issued five-year
warrants (the “Auctus Warrants”) to purchase up to 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise
price of $2.00 per share, subject to adjustment.

Pursuant
to the Auctus May Note, at any time the Company consummates a financing transaction, the Company is required to apply at least
60% of the proceeds from such sales towards the payment of the Auctus May Note. In addition, the Auctus May Note contains a prohibition
with respect to the consummation of a transaction involving capital raising or financing from any party through the sale of debt
and/or equity securities for a period of at least 90 days after the issuance date of the Auctus May Note, or until August 13,
2017, without the consent of Auctus. Finally, the Auctus Notes have a cross-default provision whereby a default of the Auctus
May Note constitutes a default of the Auctus April Note.

On
November 9, 2017, the Company received a notice of default from Auctus with respect to the Auctus Notes, and Auctus commenced
a lawsuit against the Company on November 27, 2017 in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
(Dkt. No. 1:17-CV-12329-LTS) (the “Lawsuit”). Auctus alleged the Company failed to apply at least 60% of the proceeds
from financing transactions consummated during its second quarter ended September 30, 2017 towards the repayment of the Auctus
May Note and the Company also failed to adhere to the prohibition of the Auctus May Note, which prohibited financing transactions
by the Company for at least 90 days following the issuance of such note, without the prior written consent of Auctus, giving rise
to an event of default. In addition, Auctus alleged a breach of the Auctus May Note resulted in a breach of the Auctus April Note
by virtue of the cross-default provision contained in the Auctus April Note. Pursuant to the complaint, Auctus requested (i) that
the Company pay such amount in damages in excess of $259,500 which consists of the principal amount of the Auctus Notes, liquidated
damages and default interest and (ii) that the Company pay reasonable legal fees incurred by Auctus with respect to the prosecution
of the lawsuit.

-23-

On
January 24, 2018, the Company and Auctus entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release (the “Settlement
Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, among other things, the Company agreed to (i) initially
register for resale on a registration to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the (“SEC”) 1,500,000
shares (the “Registrable Securities”) of the Company’s common stock issuable upon conversion of the Auctus Notes
and (ii) upon sale of all of the Registrable Securities, register for resale on a registration to be filed with the SEC such additional
shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued to Auctus pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. In addition,
if the Company files a registration statement with the SEC, Auctus shall have the right to request that the Company register shares
of common stock underlying warrants issued to Auctus. The parties have agreed to release the other party together with its predecessors,
parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, divisions, successors and assigns and the respective trustees, officers, directors, agents,
representatives, employees, principals, shareholder, heirs, executors, administrators, attorneys and assigns from any and all
liability actions, claims, damages, expenses or costs of whatever nature related to or arising out of the April 7, 2017 and
May 15, 2017 Securities Purchase Agreement and the Auctus Notes. In addition, the parties have agreed to cause a Stipulation of
Dismissal with Prejudice to be filed with respect to the Lawsuit.

EMA
Financial, LLC

The
Company entered into Securities Purchase Agreements with EMA Financial LLC (“EMA”) for the sale of 12% convertible
promissory notes in aggregate principal amount of $259,500. On April 10, 2017, the Company issued EMA a convertible promissory
note in the principal amount of $175,000 (the “EMA April Note”) and on May 15, 2017, the Company issued EMA a convertible
promissory note in the principal amount of $84,500 (the “EMA May Note” and together with the EMA April Note, the “EMA
Notes”). In connection with the issuance of the EMA Notes, the Company issued five-year warrants (the “EMA Warrants”)
to purchase up to 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share, subject to adjustment.

On
September 1, 2017, the Company received a notice of default from EMA with respect to the EMA Notes, and EMA commenced a lawsuit
against the Company on October 19, 2017 with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No.: 1:17-cv-08072).
EMA alleges that the Company failed to file a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock underlying
the EMA Notes thus giving rise to an event of default. Pursuant to the complaint, EMA requested (i) that the Company immediately
file a registration statement with the SEC with respect to the shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon the conversion
of the EMA Notes, (ii) that the Company and Cannavoices and FHA, as guarantors of the EMA Notes, pay such amount in damages in
excess of $259,500 which consists of the principal amount of the EMA Notes, liquidated damages and default interest and (iii)
that the Company pay reasonable legal fees incurred by EMA with respect to the prosecution of the lawsuit. The Company filed a
Motion to Dismiss the Complaint based on the criminal usury defense under New York law on January 18, 2018. EMA filed a Motion
for Summary Judgment on the Complaint on February 2, 2018.

On
March 15, 2018, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with EMA pursuant to which the Company agreed to accept a settlement
amount sufficient to enable EMA to realize $800,000 in total principal due from the net sale proceeds of the Company’s common
stock (the “EMA Settlement Amount”). EMA shall have the right to convert the EMA Settlement Amount pursuant to the
terms of the EMA Notes; provided, however, until such time that the EMA Settlement Amount has been realized in full, EMA may only
sell the greater of (i) 18% of the average daily trading volume of the Company’s common stock or (ii) $2,500 in net daily
transaction value on a daily basis. In the event EMA does not realize at least $500,000 in net sale proceeds by July 11, 2018,
the settlement amount will increase by $35,000 for each month EMA does not realize $500,000. EMA must realize the entire EMA Settlement
Amount by December 13, 2018 or the Company will be considered in default of the terms of the settlement agreement. In the event
that EMA realizes an amount in excess of the EMA Settlement Amount, EMA shall be entitled to retain such excess amount.

Our
common stock was originally listed on the OTC Pink tier of the over-the-counter market on May 13, 2014 under the symbol “AMRD”.
Effective July 28, 2016 we changed our symbol to “HVST”. Effective December 1, 2017 we changed our symbol to “ASNT”.
There has been limited trading in our common stock to date. There are no assurances that an active market will ever develop for
the Company’s stock

The
following table sets forth the high and low closing bid prices for our common stock for the periods indicated. The quotations
reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Year
ended March 31, 2018

High

Low

First
Quarter

$

4.50

$

1.85

Second
Quarter

$

9.04

$

2.00

Third
Quarter

$

5.45

$

1.70

Fourth
Quarter

$

2.10

$

0.06

Year
ended March 31, 2017

High

Low

First
Quarter

$

26.90

$

5.50

Second
Quarter

$

19.56

$

1.40

Third
Quarter

$

6.00

$

2.25

Fourth
Quarter

$

4.85

$

1.68

-24-

Holders

As
of July 12, 2018, we had approximately 310 holders of record of our common stock and one holder of our preferred
stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial
owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies.
The transfer agent of our common stock is ClearTrust, LLC, located at 16540 Pointe Village Drive, Suite 205, Lutz, Florida 33558.

Dividend
Policy

We
have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. The payment of dividends on our common stock in the future
will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, operating and financial condition and such other factors as our Board of Directors
may consider appropriate. We currently have 103,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. Each
share of Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to receive an annual 12% cumulative dividend, compounded daily, payable upon redemption,
liquidation or conversion thereof, which dividend rate shall be increased to 22% upon the occurrence of an event of default. As
of March 31, 2018, we did not pay any cash dividends on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Except for dividends
payable to holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, we currently expect to use available funds to finance the future development
and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying dividends, on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities

In
February 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 808,750 shares of common stock at an average price of $0.40 per share, upon
the conversion of convertible notes and accrued interest thereon of $323,100.

In
March 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,935,000 shares of common stock at an average price of $0.07 per share, upon the
conversion of the principal amount of convertible notes and accrued interest thereon of $212,200.

-25-

In
connection with the foregoing, the Company relied upon the exemption from securities registration provided by Section 4(a)(2)
under the Securities Act for transactions not involving a public offering.

Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The
Company does not have any equity compensation plans or any individual compensation arrangements with respect to its common stock
or preferred stock. The issuance of any of our common or preferred stock is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, which
has the power to issue any or all of our authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval.

ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Smaller
reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

You
should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with financial statements
and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements
that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed in the section titled “Risk
Factors”.

General

The
consolidated financial statements presented are those of Arias Intel Corp. The Company is a digital media platform for
technology, media and gaming, which includes mobile gaming, on-demand delivery, digital media, and e-commerce, with a focus
on the cannabis industry and emerging growth sectors. The Company is an early-stage company
and has not generated any revenue as of March 31, 2018. The Company plans to generate
revenue primarily through in-app purchases, service fees, and cross-channel advertising.

The
Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on February 27, 2013 as “American Riding Tours, Inc.”
Effective July 22, 2016, the Company changed its name from “American Riding Tours, Inc.” to “First Harvest Corp.”
Effective December 1, 2017, the Company changed its name from “First Harvest Corp.” to “Arias Intel Corp.”
Prior to the reverse acquisition described below, the Company did not have any significant assets or operations.

Financial
Statements Presented

On
February 10, 2017, the Company entered into and closed the Merger Agreement with Acquisition Corp. and Cannavoices. Pursuant to
the Merger Agreement, effective on the Closing Date (i) Acquisition Corp. merged with and into Cannavoices, such that Cannavoices,
the surviving corporation, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and (ii) the Company issued an aggregate of 23,267,231
shares of common stock to the shareholders of Cannavoices, representing approximately 97.7% of the Company’s then
outstanding shares of common stock, following the Closing Date, in exchange for the cancellation of all of the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock of Cannavoices.

-26-

The
sole officer, one of the directors and, prior to closing of the Merger Agreement, the largest stockholder of Cannavoices was Kevin
Gillespie, the Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman of the Board and largest stockholder of the Company.

Cannavoices
was incorporated on June 5, 2015 as a Florida corporation. On the Closing Date, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Cannavoices
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The acquisition of Cannavoices is treated as a reverse acquisition, and the business
of Cannavoices became the business of the Company. Cannavoices was deemed the accounting acquirer, while the Company was deemed
the legal acquirer. At the time of the reverse recapitalization, the Company was not engaged in any active business.

The
consolidated financial statements of the Company are those of Arias Intel Corp. and of the consolidated subsidiaries from the
Closing Date and subsequent periods.

Results
of Operations

For
the Year Ended March 31, 2018 compared to the Year Ended March 31, 2017

Revenues
and Cost of Goods Sold. We had no revenues or cost of goods sold during the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

Total
Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses for the year ended March 31, 2018 were $5,810,659, as compared to $4,405,848
for the year ended March 31, 2017, an increase of $1,404,811, or 31.9%. This increase was primarily due to the increase in compensation
expense, professional fees and amortization expense under general and administrative expenses and an impairment charge to the
IP Assets.

General
and administrative expenses for the year ended March 31, 2018 were $3,701,001, an increase of $496,729 or 15.5%,
from $3,204,272 for the year ended March 31, 2017. This increase was primarily due to an increase in non-cash amortization
expense of $469,406 associated with the accounting treatment related to the IP Assets, as well as higher administrative and professional
fees associated with public company costs.

During
the year ended March 31, 2018, we incurred non-cash compensation expense of $2,780,384 as part of general and administrative expenses
by issuing shares of common stock to various individuals as an incentive for participating in our operations and development compared
to $2,123,191 during the year ended March 31, 2017, an increase of $657,193 or 31.0%. The increase was primarily due to higher
consulting and director fees. By issuing shares in lieu of cash consideration, we were able to utilize outside expertise for project
management and preserve cash.

General
and administrative expenses to related parties for the year ended March 31, 2018 were $1,152,973, an increase of $526,797 or 84.1%,
from $626,176 for the year ended March 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to the additional compensation expense for a new
director.

Research
and development expenses to a related party for the year ended March 31, 2018 were $199,000, a decrease of $376,400 or 65.4%,
from $575,400 for the year ended March 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily related to our shift in development work to our beta-test
launch of the Game. Our research and development expenses primarily relate to our outside gaming app development costs
for the Game performed by HKA. During the year ended March 31, 2018, we have primarily been in beta-test mode of the
Game to determine technical feasibility and the additional development direction of the Game for the targeted audience.

-27-

Impairment
for intellectual property for the year ended March 31, 2018 was $757,685 compared to $0 for the year ended March 31, 2017. The
increase related to the testing the IP Assets for impairment and corresponding write-down after we concluded the IP Assets require
further development. The write-down was determined based on the present value calculation of estimated future cash flows to account
for the delays in development. The resulting loss was charged to impairment intellectual property contained within the operating
expenses. The Company estimates the IP Assets hold value for sale in-part or in-whole to a third party, as well as pursuing opportunities
for development or licensing.

Total
Other Income (Expense). Total other expenses for the year ended March 31, 2018 were $4,409,261, as compared to $129,212
for the year ended March 31, 2017, an increase of $4,280,049 or 3,312.4%. This increase was primarily due to the increase in non-cash
interest expense and change in derivative liabilities associated with the accounting treatment for the convertible notes payable
to two institutions and their subsequent settlement in the aggregate amount of $1,600,000 (collectively, the “Convertible
Notes Payable”), as further explained in the notes to the financial statements.

Interest
income, related party for the year ended March 31, 2018 was $6,000, which reflected no change from the year ended March
31, 2017. The interest income is accrued interest related to a $100,000 convertible note receivable from a social media company.
The Company conducts a periodic review of the collectability of the convertible promissory note. Based on our analysis of the
issuer and lack of current financial information, we elected to write-off the principal balance of $100,000 and accrued interest
of $12,000 as of March 31, 2018.

Total
interest expense for the year ended March 31, 2018 was $1,217,788, an increase of $1,082,576 or 800.7%, from $135,212 for the
year ended March 31, 2017. This increase was due primarily to the non-cash interest expenses related to the accounting treatment
for embedded debt derivative and warrant liability charges for the Convertible Notes Payable.

We
incurred a loss on the debt modification for the year ended March 31, 2018 of $2,652,729 compared to $0 for the year ended
March 31, 2017, related to the accounting treatment for embedded debt derivative and warrant liability charges for the Convertible
Notes Payable. The original and modified debt instruments due to the settlement agreements are considered substantially different
as the difference between the present value of the remaining cash flows under the original and the modified terms is greater than
10%. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 470, since the present value of the cash
flows under the new debt instrument was at least 10% different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the terms
of the original debt instrument, we accounted for the settlements as a debt extinguishment. Accordingly, we wrote-off the remaining
debt discount on the original notes of $156,959 to interest expense. In addition, we recorded the increase in carrying value of
the debt of the Convertible Notes Payable of $540,500 and $547,750 as part of loss on debt modification, respectively. Lastly,
due to the increase in fair value of the underlying conversion option granted under the settlement notes, we recorded $821,491
and $742,988 representing the increase of the holder’s conversion option as loss on debt modification, respectively. The
change in fair value was determined using the binomial option method.

We
incurred a loss on the change in the derivative and warrant liability for the year ended March 31, 2018 of $544,744 compared to
$0 for the year ended March 31, 2017, related to the accounting treatment for embedded debt derivative and warrant liability
charges for the Convertible Notes Payable.

Net
Loss. As a result of the foregoing, the net loss for the year ended March 31, 2018 was $10,219,920 or $0.35 per common
share, basic and diluted, as compared to a net loss of $4,535,060 or $0.20 per common share, basic and diluted, for the year ended
March 31, 2017, an increase of $5,684,860 or 125.4%.

Reconciliation
of GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures

The
following table contains financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States (“GAAP”). Such measures, which are unaudited and should only be read in conjunction with
our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are intended to serve
as a supplement to the GAAP results. The unaudited non-GAAP information reflects the adjustment to GAAP net income attributable
to common shareholders on a non-GAAP basis, whereby the effect of non-cash adjustments for each period presented for non-cash
expenses are added back to the GAAP net income attributable to common shareholders. This non-GAAP adjustment has been used to
calculate the non-GAAP earnings per share. The non-GAAP operating results for the years presented are not necessarily indicative
of results for any future periods, but management believes these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors
for a more accurate picture of the Company’s operations on an ongoing basis.

-28-

Arias
Intel Corp.

RECONCILIATION
OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

For
the Year Ended

March
31, 2018

For
the Year Ended

March
31, 2017

GAAP NET LOSS

$

(10,219,920

)

$

(4,535,060

)

Non-GAAP adjustments:

Add Non-Cash Charges:

Non-cash amortization
expense

$

469,406

$

-

Non-cash stock-based
compensation

2,780,383

2,123,191

Non-cash expenses

121,106

-

Non-cash loss on
debt modification

2,652,729

-

Non-cash amortization
of debt discount

1,035,214

18,333

Non-cash preferred
stock discount

1,129

-

Non-cash
charge of bad debt expense

107,667

-

Non-cash impairment
intellectual property

757,685

-

Non-Cash loss for
Change in Fair Value of Derivative

544,744

-

Total Non-Cash
Charges

$

8,470,063

$

2,141,524

Non-GAAP Net Loss

$

(1,749,857

)

$

(2,393,536

)

Non-GAAP Earnings (Loss) Per Share

$

(0.06

)

$

(0.10

)

Going
Concern

In
their report dated July 13, 2018, our independent registered public accounting firm stated that our financial statements
for the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were prepared assuming that we would continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue
as a going concern is an issue raised as we have not generated revenue and incurred a net loss of $10,219,920 at March 31, 2018.
We had an accumulated deficit of $17,282,305 as of March 31, 2018, expect to generate net losses for the near future, and require
additional financing to fund future operations. Our financial statements contain additional disclosures describing the circumstances
that led to this disclosure.

Our
operations have not yet resulted in revenue generation and we have financed our activities using equity and debt financings. Our
ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our ability to achieve and maintain profitable operations or obtain necessary
funding from outside sources, including obtaining additional funding from the sale of our securities or obtaining loans from various
financial institutions or private sources, where possible. Our lack of revenue and continued net operating losses increase the
difficulty in meeting such goals and there can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful. While we continually
look for additional financing sources, in the current economic environment the procurement of outside funding is difficult and
there can be no assurance that such financing will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Accordingly,
management plans to raise capital to finance our operating and capital requirements. However, we may be unable to do so on terms
that are acceptable to us, if at all, particularly given our current financial condition. While we are devoting our best efforts
to achieve the business plans, there is no assurance that any such activity will generate funds that will be available for operations.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

-29-

Liquidity
and Capital Resources

The
following table summarizes total current assets, liabilities and working capital at March 31, 2018 compared to March 31, 2017:

March
31, 2018

March
31, 2017

Change

Current
Assets

$

28,323

$

-

$

28,323

Current
Liabilities

$

4,149,750

$

1,445,552

$

2,704,198

Working
Capital Deficiency

$

(4,121,427

)

$

(1,445,552

)

$

(2,675,875

)

As
of March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017, we had a working capital deficiency of $4,121,427 and $1,445,552, respectively, an
increase of $2,675,875 or 185.1%. The increase in working capital deficiency was primarily due to the accounting treatment
related to the Convertible Notes Payable for the embedded debt derivative and warrant liability of $1,618,196 at March
31, 2018 compared to $0 at March 31, 2017. The derivative financial instruments require that the Company record fair value of
the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Notes Payable and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting
date which at March 31, 2018 was $1,588,342 and $29,854 for the debt derivative and warrant liability, respectively.

For
the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, we recorded no revenue. As a result, we do not have any capital resources to meet our
projected cash flow requirements to conduct our proposed operations. We presently do not have any available credit, bank financing
or other external sources of liquidity. Therefore, we will require additional financing in order to develop our business. We cannot
predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity or debt, or be in another form. We may not be able to
obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. In any of these events, we may be unable
to implement our current plans for operations and these circumstances would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects,
financial condition and results of operations.

During
the year ended March 31, 2018, we used net cash of $1,664,474 in operations and generated $1,664,474 cash from financing
activities, including common stock sales and issuance of notes payable. During the year ended March 31, 2017, we used net cash
of $2,184,502 in operations and generated $2,129,771 cash from financing activities from common stock sales and issuance of notes
payable.

Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements

None.

Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates

Revenue
Recognition: We recognize revenue related to product sales when (i) persuasive evidence of the arrangement exists, (ii) shipment
has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. For the period from February
27, 2013 (inception) to March 31, 2018, we have not recognized any revenue.

Stock-Based
Compensation:We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation
– Stock Compensation” using the fair value method. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration
received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the
fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Equity instruments issued to employees and
the cost of the services received as consideration are measured and recognized based on the fair value of the equity instruments
issued. We account for stock-based compensation to consultants and other third parties in accordance with ASC 505-50 “Equity-Based
Payments to Non-Employees.” Compensation expense is determined at the “measurement date.” The expense is recognized
over the vesting period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains
uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date.

Convertible
Instruments:GAAP requires companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments
and account for them as free-standing derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria include circumstances
in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related
to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative
instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles
with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded
derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument. An exception to this rule is when the host instrument is deemed
to be conventional, as that term is described under applicable ASC 480-10.

-30-

When
the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments, the Company
records, when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments
based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction
and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of
the related debt to their stated date of redemption.

Derivative
Financial Instruments: The Company classifies, as equity, any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share
settlement or (ii) provide the Company with a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement
or net-share settlement) providing that such contracts are indexed to the Company’s own stock. The Company classifies as
assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract
if an event occurs and if that event is outside the Company’s control) or (ii) gives the counterparty a choice of net-cash
settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company assesses classification of its common
stock purchase warrants and other free-standing derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification
between assets and liabilities is required.

The
Company’s free-standing derivatives consisted of warrants to purchase common stock that were issued in connection with the
issuance of debt and of embedded conversion options with convertible debentures. The Company evaluated these derivatives to assess
their proper classification in the balance sheet as of March 31, 2018 using the applicable classification criteria enumerated
under ASC 815-Derivatives and Hedging. The Company determined that certain embedded conversion and/or exercise features do not
contain fixed settlement provisions. The convertible debentures contain a conversion feature such that the Company could not ensure
it would have adequate authorized shares to meet all possible conversion demands.

As
such, the Company was required to record the derivatives which do not have fixed settlement provisions as liabilities and mark
to market all such derivatives to fair value at the end of each reporting period.

Recent
Pronouncements

In
August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The amendments in ASU 2017-12
provided guidance to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s
risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement
guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results in the financial statements. The amendments
expand and refine hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and align the recognition and presentation
of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. For public business entities, the amendments
in ASU 2017-12 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. While the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-12 to have a material
effect on its business, the Company is still evaluating any potential impact that adoption of ASU 2017-12 may have on its financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives
and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in Part I of this update change the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial
instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be
classified as liabilities or equity instruments, a down round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing
whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements
for equity-classified instruments. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option)
no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature.
For freestanding equity classified financial instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings per share (“EPS”)
in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as
a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with embedded conversion
options that have down round features are now subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial conversion features
(in Subtopic 470-20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options), including related EPS guidance (in Topic 260). The amendments
in Part II of this update recharacterize the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented as
pending content in the codification, to a scope exception. Those amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business
entities, the amendments in Part I of this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2018, which would be the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2020. Early adoption is permitted
for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any
adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. While the Company does
not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-11 to have a material effect on its business, the Company is still evaluating any potential
impact that adoption of ASU 2017-11 may have on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

-31-

In
May 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, which
amends the scope of modification accounting surrounding share-based payment arrangements as issued in ASU 2016-09 by providing
guidance on the various types of changes which would trigger modification accounting for share-based payment awards. ASU 2017-09
is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods, which would
be the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period,
for public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. While the Company
does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-09 to have a material effect on its business, the Company is still evaluating any potential
impact that adoption of ASU 2017-09 may have on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, to
improve and simplify the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory,
requiring companies to recognize income tax consequences upon the transfer of the asset to a third party. ASU 2016-16 is effective
for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods, which would be the Company’s
fiscal year ending March 31, 2019. While the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-16 to have a material effect on
its business, the Company is still evaluating any potential impact that adoption of ASU 2016-16 may have on its financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.

In
August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash
Payments, which will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement
of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those
annual periods, which would be the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2019. The Company does not expect the adoption
of ASU 2016-15 to have a material effect on its business, its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation – Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting for several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions,
including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement
of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those
annual periods, which would be the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have
a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) to increase transparency and comparability among organizations
by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements.
Topic 842 affects any entity that enters into a lease, with some specified scope exemptions. The guidance in this update supersedes
Topic 840, Leases. The core principle of Topic 842 is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from
leases. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability)
and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For public companies, the amendments
in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal
years, which would be the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2020. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-09
to have a material effect on its business, its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and
Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The updated guidance enhances the reporting model for financial
instruments and requires entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure
purposes, and the separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial
asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, which would be the Company’s
fiscal year ending March 31, 2019. The Company expects that this guidance will not have a material effect on its financial statements.

In
November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” (“ASU 2015-17”),
which requires entities to present deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet.
ASU 2015-17 simplifies the current guidance in ASC 740, which requires entities to separately present deferred tax assets and
liabilities as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods, which would be the Company’s fiscal year ending March
31, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption
of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern,” which impacts
the accounting guidance related to the evaluation of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The amendment establishes
management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as
a going concern in connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period. The amendment
also gives guidance to determine whether to disclose information about relevant conditions and events when there is substantial
doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The amended guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company has adopted this new guidance effective as of the inception date. The adoption
of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) which amended the existing accounting
standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 establishes principles for recognizing revenue upon the transfer of promised goods
or services to customers, in an amount that reflects the expected consideration received in exchange for those goods or services.
In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (including interim
reporting periods within those periods), which would be the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2019. Early adoption
is permitted to the original effective date for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (including interim
reporting periods within those periods). The amendments may be applied retrospectively to each prior period (full retrospective)
or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application (modified retrospective). The Company
will adopt ASU 2014-09 beginning April 1, 2018 and apply the full retrospective approach. Until such time as the Company makes
an acquisition or commences monetizing its assets, the Company does not know what the impact of this new standard will be or if
it will impact the Company’s disclosure.

-32-

ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Market
risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, including interest rates, commodity prices and
equity prices. We do not hold any market risk sensitive investments.

ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Our
financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are set forth at the pages indicated in Item 15(a) of this Form
10-K.

ITEM
9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM
9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pursuant
to Rules 13a-15(b) and 15-d-15(b) under the Exchange Act, the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the
Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness
of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. The term “disclosure
controls and procedures”, as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other
procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that
it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified
in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act
is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management,
with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer (who is also our principal financial officer), has evaluated the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based
on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were
not effective. Our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of the “material weaknesses” described
below under “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting,” which are in the process of
being remediated as described below under “Management Plan to Remediate Material Weaknesses.”

Our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal
controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect
the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.

-33-

Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment,
our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”)
in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal
control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Based
on its assessment, management has concluded that we had certain control deficiencies described below that constituted material
weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting. As a result, our internal controls over financial reporting were
not effective as of March 31, 2018.

As
a result of management’s review of the investigation issues and results, and other internal reviews and evaluations that
were completed as of March 31, 2018 related to the preparation of management’s report on internal controls over financial
reporting required for this Annual Report on Form 10-K, management concluded that we had material weaknesses in our control
environment and financial reporting process consisting of the following:

1)

We
lack a functioning
audit committee due to a lack of independent board members, resulting in ineffective
oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures;
and

2)

We
did not have sufficient personnel in our accounting and financial reporting functions. As a result, we were not able to achieve
adequate segregation of duties and were not able to provide for adequate review of the financial statements. This control
deficiency, which is pervasive in nature, results in a reasonable possibility that material misstatements of the financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We
do not believe the material weaknesses described above caused any meaningful or significant misreporting of our financial condition
and results of operations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning
audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board results in ineffective oversight in the establishment
and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements
in future periods.

-34-

Management
Plan to Remediate Material Weaknesses

Management
is pursuing the implementation of corrective measures to address the material weaknesses described above. In an effort
to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or
plan to initiate, the following series of measures:

We
plan to appoint one or more outside directors to our Board of Directors who shall also be appointed to an audit committee
resulting in a fully functioning audit committee which will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring
of required internal controls and procedures such as reviewing and approving estimates and assumptions made by management when
funds are available to us. Additionally, we intend to create written policies and procedures for accounting and financial
reporting with respect to the requirements and application of GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements.

In
addition, when funds are available, we intend to hire knowledgeable personnel with technical accounting expertise to further
support our current accounting personnel. As our operations are relatively small and we continue to have net losses each quarter,
we do not anticipate being able to hire additional internal personnel until such time as our operations are profitable or until
our operations are large enough to justify the hiring of additional accounting personnel. We will engage consultants in the future,
as necessary, in order to ensure proper accounting for our consolidated financial statements.

Due
to the fact that our internal accounting staff consists solely of a principal financial officer, additional personnel will also
ensure the proper segregation of duties and provide more checks and balances within the department. Additional personnel will
also provide the cross training needed to support us in the even personnel turnover occurs within the department.
We believe this will greatly decrease any control and procedure issues we may encounter in the future.

We
believe the remediation measures described above will remediate the material weaknesses we have identified and strengthen our
internal control over financial reporting. We are committed to continuing to improve our internal control processes and will continue
to diligently and vigorously review our financial reporting controls and procedures. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve
our internal control over financial reporting, we may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies or
determine to modify, or in appropriate circumstances not to complete, certain of the remediation measures described above.

This annual report does not include an attestation
report by RBSM LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. As
a smaller reporting company, our management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting
firm pursuant to rules of the SEC.

Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

-35-

PART
III

ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors
and Executive Officers

The
names of executive officers and directors are set forth below. All directors are elected annually by our stockholders to serve
until the next annual meeting of the stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The officers are
elected by our Board.

Name

Age

Position

Kevin
Gillespie

48

Chief
Executive Officer, Chairman, President, and Director

Daniel
Hammett

56

Chief
Technology Officer, Executive Vice President and Director

Background
of Executive Officers and Directors

Kevin
Gillespie

Kevin
Gillespie, has been President, Chief Executive Officer and director of Arias Intel Corp since July 2016 and President, Chief Executive
Officer and director of Cannavoices since June 2015. Since November 2014, Mr. Gillespie has been the President and Chief Executive
Officer of First Harvest Financial, Inc. (“FHF”), a financial consulting company. Since April 2016, Mr. Gillespie
has been the Managing Member of Lexington Tech Ventures Management LLC (“Lexington”), a financial consulting company.
Since November 2015, Mr. Gillespie has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of FH Acquisition Corp. (“FHA”),
a financial consulting company. Since April 2016, Mr. Gillespie has been a Member and Managing Director of Midtown Partners &
Co, LLC, a registered broker-dealer. From October 2015 to June 2017, Mr. Gillespie was the Chairman of the board of directors
of The Great American Rolling Paper Company (“GARP”), (formerly operating as Watchtower Masterpieces, Inc.), a rolling
paper distribution company. From February 2015 until October 2016, Mr. Gillespie was the President and Chief Executive Officer
of FHF Opportunity Fund I, LLC, and from May 2011 until January 2015, Mr. Gillespie was a Vice President at JP Turner &
Company, LLC, a registered broker-dealer. Mr. Gillespie previously worked for Gunn Allen Financial, a regional asset management
firm in Florida, for 15 years. Mr. Gillespie holds series 7 and 63 licenses with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority,
Inc. Mr. Gillespie’s financial industry experience qualifies him to serve on the Company’s board of directors.

Daniel
Hammett

Daniel
Hammett has been the Chief Technology Officer, Executive Vice President and Director since of the Company August 2017.
He has over 28 years of executive experience as a software designer, developer and publisher. Since November 2014, Mr. Hammett
has served as the Chief Executive Officer of HKA, a studio and publisher of entertainment and social games developed for mobile,
desktop, online and console platforms, which developed the Company’s Hemp Inc mobile game. From November 2014 until
November 2015, Mr. Hammett served as Chief Executive Officer of KamaGames Ltd., the creator of a leading mobile poker game entitled
Pokerist, which has over 90 million downloads. From January 2013 until May 2014, he served as Chief Executive Officer and
President of iEntertainment Network, Inc., and from December 2009 until December 2012, he served as Chief Operating Officer of
Mastiff LLC. Mr. Hammett has previously held executive officer roles with such noted companies as Activision Blizzard, Inc., NBCUniversal
Media, LLC, Headgames Publishing, Inc. and Divergent Entertainment, Inc. Since August 2015, Mr. Hammett has served as an advisory
board member of BWG Strategy LLC, a network of senior executives across technology, media and telecom. During his career, Mr.
Hammett has led the development of such iconic games, intellectual properties and brands as Call of Duty, Spiderman,
Toy Story, Tony Hawk, Cabela’s Big Game Hunter and many others. He has also founded four companies
which have been acquired by publicly-traded companies on the NYSE, Nasdaq and the OTC Markets. Mr. Hammett received his B.S. in
economics from California Polytechnic State University, where he was a two-time All-American wrestler. The Board believes that
Mr. Hammett is qualified to serve as an officer and director of the Company because of his experience as a developer and publisher
of branded consumer software for the mass market.

-36-

Family
Relationships

There
are no family relationships among our directors and executive officers.

Other
Directorships

Other
than as disclosed above, none of the directors of the Company are also directors of issuers with a class of securities registered
under Section 12 of the Exchange Act (or which otherwise are required to file periodic reports under the Exchange Act).

Legal
Proceedings

We
are not aware of any of our directors or officers being involved in any legal proceedings in the past ten years relating to any
matters in bankruptcy, insolvency, criminal proceedings (other than traffic and other minor offenses) or being subject to any
of the items set forth under Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K.

Board
Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Due
to the small size and early stage of the Company, we have not adopted a formal policy on whether the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer positions should be separate or combined. Mr. Gillespie currently serves as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board.

Our
Board of Directors is primarily responsible for overseeing our risk management processes on behalf of the Company. The Board of
Directors receives and reviews periodic reports from management, auditors, legal counsel, and others, as considered appropriate
regarding our company’s assessment of risks. The Board of Directors focuses on the most significant risks facing our Company
and our Company’s general risk management strategy, and also ensures that risks undertaken by our Company are
consistent with the board’s appetite for risk. While the Board oversees our Company’s risk management,
management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibilities is the most effective
approach for addressing the risks facing our Company and that our board leadership structure supports this approach.

-37-

Board
Committees

There
are currently no committees of the Board of Directors. The Company’s Board of Directors acts as its audit committee.
The Company does not currently have a director who meets the definition of an “audit committee financial expert,”
as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K because the Company does not currently have the resources to retain an individual
with such qualification.

Code
of Ethics

We
have not yet adopted a Code of Ethics because we have been a development stage company and have no employees other than officers
and directors; however, we expect to adopt a Code of Ethics in the future as we develop our infrastructure and business.

Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered
class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common
stock and other equity securities. Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are required by
SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To our knowledge, based solely upon a review of
Forms 3, 4, and 5 furnished to us during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, we believe that the directors, executive officers,
and greater than 10% beneficial owners have complied with all applicable filing requirements during the fiscal year ended March
31, 2018, except the following:

●

The
initial Form 3 filed by Daniel Hammett in which he failed to report one transaction on time;

●

Two
Form 4s filed by Daniel Hammett in which he failed to report an aggregate of two transactions on time; and

●

One
Form 4 filed by Kevin Gillespie in which he failed to report an aggregate of four transactions on time.

Changes
in Nominating Procedures

None.

ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Summary
Compensation Table

The
following table provides certain summary information concerning compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive
officers for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

Kevin Gillespie
is the Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman of the Board and the largest shareholder of the Company. He was paid $387,643
and $270,571 by the Company as a subcontractor for the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. He currently has
no formal compensation agreement with the Company. Mr. Gillespie is the majority shareholder or sole owner of related parties
that were paid $55,330 and $257,893 for services to the Company, including accounting, administration, management, marketing,
IT support, due diligence and evaluation of acquisition candidates, for the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Mr. Gillespie is the majority shareholder or sole owner of related parties that were paid $60,000 and $126,265 for rent for
the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Item 13 – Certain Relationship and Related Transactions,
and Director Independence.

(2)

Daniel Hammett is
the president and majority shareholder of HKA. The Company entered into a game development and licensing agreement with HKA
on October 2, 2015 (the “Development Agreement”). The Company paid HKA $199,000 and $575,400 for the years ended
March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. To date the Company has paid HKA an aggregate of $1,394,400 under the Development Agreement.
The total value of the Development Agreement is $2,000,000 based on certain development parameters and ongoing scope of work.
On August 1, 2017, the Company awarded Daniel Hammett 650,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $650,000
at $1.00 per share for Mr. Hammett’s services to the Company as its Chief Technology Officers and member of the
Board of Directors. See Item 13 – Certain Relationship and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

-38-

Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

None.

Director
Compensation

The
following table shows for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, certain information with respect to the compensation of all directors
of the Company:

Name

Fees
Earned or Paid in Cash ($)

Stock
Awards($)

Option
Awards($)

Non-EquityIncentive PlanCompensation($)

Non-QualifiedDeferredCompensationEarnings ($)

All
OtherCompensation($)

Total
($)

Kevin Gillespie

-

-

-

-

-

$

387,643

$

387,643

Danielle Hammett (1)

-

$

650,000

-

-

-

-

$

650,000

(1)
Effective August 1, 2017, Daniel Hammett received a restricted stock award of 650,000 shares of our common stock. We expensed
$650,000 at $1.00 per share based on the then price offered in private stock sales at or near the date of the award.

Employment
Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change-In-Control Arrangements

The
following table sets forth certain information, as of July 12, 2018, with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s
outstanding common stock by (i) any holder of more than 5% of our securities; (ii) each of the Company’s executive
officers and directors; and (iii) the Company’s directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated,
each of the stockholders listed below has sole voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned.

Applicable
percentage ownership is based on 50,707,248 shares of common stock outstanding
as of July 12, 2018, together with securities exercisable or convertible into
shares of common stock within 60 days of July 12, 2018 for each stockholder. Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes
voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock that are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 12, 2018 are deemed
to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing
the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the
purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(3)

Applicable
percentage ownership is based on 103,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding as of July 12, 2018.

(4)

Includes
(i) 5,641,929 shares of Common Stock held by Kevin Gillespie, (ii) 6,650,000 shares of Common Stock held by Kevin Gillespie
and his spouse as joint tenants by the entirety and (iii) 300,000 shares of Common Stock held by FHF. Kevin Gillespie is the
President of FHF and in such capacity has voting and dispositive power over the securities held by such entity.

(5)

Greg
Solomon is the President of Geneva Roth Remark Holdings, Inc. and in such capacity has voting and dispositive power over the
securities held by such entity.

The
related parties have provided certain management services and incurred expenses on behalf of the Company for the years ended March
31, 2018 and 2017, including accounting, administration, management, marketing, IT support, rent, due diligence and evaluation
of acquisition candidates.

For
the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, the related parties have been reimbursed the following for management and subcontractor
fees, respectively: (a) FHF - $36,430 and $174,600, respectively, (b) GARP - $18,900 and $80,693, respectively,
(c) FHC - $0 and $200, respectively and (d) Lexington - $0 and $3,000, respectively.

The
Company incurred rent expense to FHF of $60,000 and $97,312 for the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company
has no formal lease with FHF.

The
Company incurred rent expense to Cannavoices of $0, and $28,953 for the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The
Company has no formal lease with Cannavoices.

The
majority shareholder of the related parties described above except HKA is the Chief Executive Officer, President,
Chairman of the Board and largest shareholder of the Company. He was paid $387,643 and $270,571 by the Company as a subcontractor
for the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The
Company entered into the Development Agreement with HKA on October 2, 2015. HKA is majority owned by a member of the Board
of Directors of the Company. The Company paid HKA $199,000 and $575,400 for the years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
As of March 31, 2018, the Company has paid HKA an aggregate of $1,394,400 under the Development Agreement. The total
value of the Development Agreement is $2,000,000 based on certain development parameters and ongoing scope of work.

Director
Independence

The
Board has determined that none of the Company’s directors are independent, as of March 31, 2018 within the meaning of the
applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules.

-40-

ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The
following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed by RBSM LLP as described below:

For
Year Ended March 31, 2018

For
the Year Ended March 31, 2017

(1)
Audit Fees (1)

$

44,000

$

48,500

(2)
Audit-Related Fees

-

-

(3)
Tax Fees

-

-

(4)
All Other Fees

-

-

(1)
Audit Fees include fees billed and expected to be billed for services performed to comply with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards,
including the recurring audit of the Company’s financial statements for such period included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K and for the reviews of the quarterly financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q filed with the SEC.

The
following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL
(Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations,
(iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (v)
the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

*
filed herewith.

**
furnished herewith.

-42-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Position

Date

/s/
Kevin Gillespie

Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal

Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer),
President and Chairman

July
13, 2018

Kevin
Gillespie

/s/
Daniel Hammett

Chief
Technology Officer, Executive Vice President and Director

July
13, 2018

Daniel
Hammett

-43-

REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Arias
Intel Corp. and subsidiaries

Opinion
on the Financial Statements

We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Arias Intel Corp. and subsidiaries (The “Company”) as
of March 31, 2018 and 2017 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for
each of the years in the two year period ended March 31, 2018 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial
statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of March 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two year
period ended March 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The
Company's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit, recurring losses, and
expects continuing future losses, and has stated that substantial doubt exists about the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern. Management's evaluation of the events and conditions and management’s plans regarding these matters are
also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome
of this uncertainty.

Basis
for Opinion

These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered
with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to
the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error
or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence
regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.