Dr. Strangelove: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson

“The globalists are responsible for the mess in America and much of the world–but Israeli or Zionist globalists are not. If all this sounds insane to you, that’s because it is. But that’s the only sophisticated thought that I can come up with.”

Jim W. Dean declared last February that Alex Jones “always seemed to have guardian angel types behind the scenes, the kind no one else had.” No kidding. Timothy Fitzpatrick actually went behind the scene and exposed who those guardian angels actually are. Fitzpatrick said then:

“If people haven’t yet been convinced that [Jones] is an outright shill and operative for the Jewish money power in this world, then I am not sure what will… he is not a legitimate patriot fighting against the New World Order but a Zionist shill.”

This is true. It has really been a blast to watch how Alex Jones has evolved this year and how he pretends to fight the New World Order but ends up agreeing (directly or indirectly) with the principles that make up the New World Order.[1] Sometimes even Fox News does a better job than Jones.

For example, Fox News at least once produced serious evidence indicating that the Israelis were accomplices in 9/11. Jones hasn’t done that at all. He usually quotes George Orwell saying that “In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”

But how is it that Jones has not been in the business of telling the whole truth? How is it that he keeps saying really crazy things such as Hollywood is owned by the Arabs, despite numerous scholarly evidence to the contrary?[2] If he is too lazy to do a little research, perhaps he should pay attention to Joel Stein, who wrote in the LA Times back in 2008:

“If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

“The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

“As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between ‘The 700 Club’ and ‘Davey and Goliath’ on TV all day. “So I’ve taken it upon myself to re-convince America that Jews run Hollywood by launching a public relations campaign, because that’s what we do best.”[3]

Speaking of people like Alex Jones (people who deliberately or naively refuse to look at the facts), Stein ended the first paragraph of his article by saying, “Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.”[4]

Instead of doing a little research and providing counter-arguments, most particularly on the Middle East, Jones has chosen to poison his listeners’ minds with crazy things such as the Arabs “control everything,” including Fox News! Jones again says that he is “about logic” and “about being fair,” but he keeps propounding one nonsense after another.

Alex Jones will never stop talking about “Muslim terrorists” and the so-called Syrian refugees because he will never start talking about the real issue. As we have pointed out in a previous article, he is an Israeli defender and puppet.

That is one reason why Jones will never start telling his listeners that Muslims are largely victims of the Zionist wars in the Middle East. If Americans are reacting to the San Bernadino debacle, why are they not reacting to thousands upon thousands of innocent Muslims who are being killed by “the globalists” in the Middle East virtually every month? Do all lives really matter? Here is the number of civilians who got exterminated in Iraq since 2008:

If we add those numbers up, we end up with 25,962 dead civilians. Furthermore, that “doesn’t include killings in December – and doesn’t include Iraqi soldiers and militants who have died. Data compiled by Agence France-Presse – whose methodology differs from the UN’s – had at least 337 Iraqi civilians killed so far this month [by the middle of December 2013]…”[6]

That doesn’t even count Libya or Afghanistan or Syria. In Syria, for example, more than 41,000 civilians have been slaughtered in the conflict.[7] Over the first six months of 2014, at least 5,500 civilians died in Iraq, while 11,665 were wounded.[8] “Another 1.2 million have been driven from their homes by the violence.”[9] We are also told that

“Nearly half a million people have died from war-related causes in Iraq since the US-led invasion in 2003, according to an academic study published in the United States on Tuesday. That toll is far higher than the nearly 115,000 violent civilian deaths reported by the British-based group Iraq Body Count, which bases its tally on media reports, hospital and morgue records, and official and non-governmental accounts.”[10]

Why doesn’t Jones even remotely say anything about this? Does he mean to tell us that he doesn’t know? If we are talking about not allowing Muslims to America and then allowing Americans to go to places like Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, and now Syria, to destroy those questions and then leave the decent people in a mess, aren’t we indirectly fulfilling an essentially Talmudic ideology? Aren’t we playing into the enemies’ hands?

You see, Jones and much of the media have already adopted the political categories which pernicious people already imposed upon America and much of the West. For the past decade or so, Jewish intellectuals and writers have relentlessly and mercilessly beaten the West over the head by saying things like the Arab world is fundamentally anti-Christian, anti-Western, and anti-Semitic.[11]

In order for that ideology to work, its proponents have to ignore the fact that the Arab world and the West worked together in the past. It must be acknowledged that Arabic countries have made enormous contributions to science, astronomy, mathematics, medicine, etc.

“From the eight century to the end of the fourteenth,” writes noted historian Toby E. Huff in his magnum opusThe Rise of Early Modern Science, “Arabic science was probably the most advanced science in the world, greatly surpassing the West and China.”[12]

In fact, the word algebra was derived from Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi’s magnum opus Al-jabr wa-al-Muqabilah, a work that was translated into Latin and was widely known all the way to the sixteenth century as a rigorous mathematical work in major European universities.[13]

It was al-Khwarizmi who to a large extent separated algebra and geometry as two distinct but compatible fields of mathematics.[14] It was because of al-Khwarizmi’s Al-jabr wa-al-Muqabilah that Europe was able to develop a field of algebraic mathematics which still carries his name.[15]

This view is common knowledge among scholars and historians of mathematics.[16] This is even acknowledged by Philo-Semitic historians and Zionists such as Niall Ferguson.[17] Mathematician and historian E. T. Bell writes,

“While Europe slept and all but forgot Greek mathematics, the Moslem scholars were industriously translating all they could recover of the works of the classic Greek mathematicians. Several of these translations became the first sources from which Christian Europe revived the mathematics it had all but let die. For this timely service to civilization, the Moslems no doubt deserve all the gratitude they have received.”[18]

“Al-Khwarizmi also contributed enormously to astronomical knowledge with detailed explanations, which “included results taken from both Ptolemy and Brahmgupta…The Algebra of Alkarismi holds a most important place in the history of mathematics, for we may say that the subsequent Arab and the early medieval works on algebra were founded on it, and also that through it the Arabic or Indian system of decimal numeration was introduced into the West.”[19]

In general, the Muslim world has made significant contributions to the West. Historian Paul Kenney of Yale writes in The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers,

“For centuries before 1500 the world of Islam had been culturally and technologically ahead of Europe. Its cities were large, well-lit, and drained, and some of them possessed universities and libraries and stunningly beautiful mosques. In mathematics, cartography, medicine, and many other aspects of science and industry—in mills, gun casting, lighthouses, and horse breeding—the Muslims had enjoyed a lead.”[20]

These stubborn facts do not line up with what we have been told in the media, most specifically by Alex Jones, who postures himself as a person who is interested in the truth.

“If ‘Muslim terrorists’ didn’t exist, I would have to invent them.”

Jones and his supporters would probably ask, “What about Muslim killings and all that hoopla?” Take it from flaming Jewish historian and Zionist Bernard Lewis of Princeton:

“Muslim fighters are commanded not to kill women, children, or the aged unless they attack first; not to torture or otherwise ill-treat prisoners; to give fair warning of the opening of hostilities or their resumption after a truce; and to honor agreements.

“In the medieval juristic literature, there are interesting discussions about the lawfulness of missiles, such as mangonels and catapults, and of chemical warfare, in the form of poison-tipped arrows and poisoning enemy water supplies.

“Some jurists permit, some restrict, and some disapprove of the use of these weapons. At no time did the classical jurists offer any approval or legitimacy to what we nowadays call terrorism. Nor indeed is there any evidence of the use of terrorism as it is practiced nowadays.”[21]

Which brings us to a central point in our conversation: polite people of this world have been using false flag operations to demonize, attack, and even humiliate Muslims. In a diabolical way, the powers that be are using the Muslims for ideological purposes. Yes, there are extremists on all religions. All you have to do is look at real puppets like John Hagee.

Alex Jones cannot address those issues historically and rationally because he will have to close down his propaganda show. Even if we move to current events, he will have a lot of rethinking to do. For example, the Jerusalem Post reported in 2013 that 66.6 percent of Israelis wanted the U.S. and the United Kingdom to attack Syria.[22] In the same year, Jewish Neocon Daniel Pipes propounded this diabolical statement:

“The West should prevent either side in the civil war from emerging victorious by helping whichever side is losing, so as to prolong their conflict… This policy recommendation of ‘helping whichever side is losing’ sounds odd, I admit, but it is strategic.”[23]

If Jones says that he is defending America, then his viewers need to start asking him deep questions. According Meretz leader Zehava Galon, Benjamin Netanyahu keeps “giving the American the finger.”[24] Jones needs to address those issues in a logical manner. If he fails to do so, then his viewers need to stop plunking down the money to support him.

As we are beginning to see, Jones needs to thoroughly explain to his viewers why they should continue to support him. Why? Because the the so-called “globalists” are largely people that Jones do not want to talk about. For example, according to the Jerusalem Post, Israel

“has opened its borders with Syria in order to provide medical treatment to Nusra Front and al-Qaida fighters wounded in the ongoing civil war…”[25]

The Post cited the Wall Street Journal saying that al-Nusra, which is a violent terrorist group, “hasn’t bothered Israel since seizing the border area last summer…”[26] There is more:

“While Israel views al-Qaida and its allies as enemies, it is far more disturbed by what it views as an even bigger menace – Iran and its proxies.”[27]

If Jewish writer Bob Dreyfuss of The Nation is right—that the war in Syria “is really about Iran and Israel”[28]—then Alex Jones needs to start talking about Israel’s monsters, which have spread like wild fire all over the Middle East and much of the West.

In order to seduce his naïve listeners, Jones has chosen to attack the symptoms rather than the real problem. For example, Israeli foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman said of Israel Arabs last March:

“Those who are with us deserve everything. Those against us, it cannot be helped, we must lift up an ax and behead them – otherwise we will not survive here.”[29]

Once again, how did Lieberman manage to escape from Jones’ “prison planet”? If Jones is really concerned about the whole truth, why doesn’t he address that at all? Why is he publishingZionist propaganda? Furthermore, why hasn’t Paul Joseph Watson been writing about the Israeli regime at all? Does he mean to tell us that he doesn’t know?

If Watson is that ignorant, then he needs to quit his propaganda job at Infowars.com. If he does know what is going on and chooses to stay silent, then he is also an Israeli front and has concealed critical information. Watson does not seem to lack the sophistication to expose the Israeli regime. We can even give him some help. For example, in 2013, the Economist declared that

“Israeli aircraft struck Syria for the first time since the Syrian uprising began nearly two years ago, say sources in Israel and Syria.”[30]

The next two sentences read:

“But the attack does not mean that Israel wants to interfere in Syria’s burgeoning civil war. Rather, it marks the continuation of Israel’s covert war against an arms build-up by Islamist militias on its border, in particular the Lebanese Shia group, Hizbullah.”[31]

You bomb Syrian territories, but it does not mean that you are interfering in Syria’s war. That is a contradiction, and it is high time that Jones and Watson tell writers in the Economist and elsewhere to shut up.

If they fail to do so, then we can conclude that both Jones and Watson have sold their souls to the Israeli regime for money and popularity. They are a carbon copy of Ann Coulter, who has made thousands and perhaps millions of dollars selling books about the so-called “Left” but never gets the courage to provide the real source of the issue.

Instead of seriously educating his listeners about the pernicious people who are bringing America down, Jones chose to praise Ted Cruz, a guy who has been basically an Israeli talisman.[32] Jones calls Cruz “a well-spoken intellectual…The establishment is scared of Ted Cruz.”[33]

Nonsense. How can the establishment be scared of you when you are an Israeli puppet? If Ted Cruz “is the answer,” as Jones propounded in 2014, then we are in trouble. Listen to this—and it is coming from Infowars.com:

“In 2011, a Cruz campaign spokesman portrayed Heidi as “an expert on North American trade,” in other words she is savvy when it comes to globalist transnational trade deals like NAFTA, the single most destructive government move against the American worker in history.”

Cruz’s greatest defender is none other than “America’s Rabbi” Shmuley Boteach,[34] a man who has been completely silent about Israel’s massacre. Cruz proved himself to be a complete buffoon when he said:

“ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, and their state sponsors like Syria and Iran, are all engaged in a vicious genocidal campaign to destroy religious minorities in the Middle East…”[35]

If Cruz is right, then we will let him debate retired Israeli official and philosopher Avner Cohen, who said that “Hamas, to my regret, is Israel’s creation.”[36]

So, the next time you are planning to watch an Alex Jones show, keep your eyes open, put your thinking cap on, and then ask Jones serious questions. Perhaps this will force him to stop concealing important information. When Paul Joseph Watson starts talking about “Muslim terrorism,” ask him about Daniel Pipes.

[1]Infowars has recently published an article entitled, “The Left’s War on Christmas.” We certainly would invite Jones to take a look at the real people behind the war on Christmas here.

[2] See for example Neal Gabler, Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood (New York: Anchor Books, 1988); Nathan Abrams, The New Jew in Film: Exploring Jewishness and Judaism in Contemporary Cinema (Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2012); Henry Bial, Acting Jewish: Negotiating Ethnicity on the American Stage and Screen (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005); Daniel Bernardi, Murray Pomerance, and Hava Tirosh-Samuelson, eds., Hollywood’s Chosen People: The Jewish Experience in American Cinema (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2013); The American Jewish Story through Cinema (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2013); J. Hoberman and Jeffrey Shandler, Entertaining America: Jews, Movies, and Broadcasting (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003); Andrea Most, Making Americans: Jews and the Broadway Musical (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004);Theatrical Liberalism: Jews and Popular Entertainment in America (New York: New York University Press, 2013); Josh Lambert, Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2014); Lawrence J. Epstein, The Haunted Smile: The Story Of Jewish Comedians In America (New York: Public Affairs, 2001).

[33] Gordon Duff once referred to Bernard Levy as a “Mossadist philosopher.” Perhaps that’s what Jones was saying about Ted Cruz—a Mossadist intellectual? Perhaps Levy, whose greatest intellectual achievement is to pour buckets of gasoline on countries he does not like, should call Cruz for a cup of coffee because both men have a kindred spirit.

Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.

ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.