#1199646 was considered for reaping as a dupe of itself.
I suspect that should have been "a dupe of #1199658" (although that one was posted about three hours later).
Anyway, as you can see above, #1199646 has been reaped: unless there's some administrative reason to change
the consideration text, there's probably nothing more to be done about that.

I replied to #1199646 (Re: Splitting a file based on matched conditions).
My post has been considered for reparenting to #1199646 (its original and current parent).
That consideration should also have probably referenced #1199658 for the new parent.
I have no problem with the reparenting; however, as it stands, the consideration is confusing:
maybe a quick s/46/58/ to fix.