Originally posted by whathappenedoverthere
What my question really is, is why hasn't any world leader come out and admitted 9/11 was an inside job?

How about because they all have their own intelligence services and know perfectly well from their own sources that it was a terrorist attack. Some of
them having been attacked themselves and others in fear of.

Originally posted by whathappenedoverthere
What my question really is, is why hasn't any world leader come out and admitted 9/11 was an inside job?

How about because they all have their own intelligence services and know perfectly well from their own sources that it was a terrorist attack. Some of
them having been attacked themselves and others in fear of.

I think 9/11 was an inside job, so this really doesn't answer my question.

Originally posted by whathappenedoverthere
Thanks for the replies everybody, but my question still really hasn't been answered.

I might be moving back to Switzerland with my family, and I am just wanting to put my mind at rest.

Basically, what I want to know is; are the countries that partook in the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq corrupt or just naive?

Absolutely corrupt and fully informed. (At least all the top brass).
Give credit to the intelligence gathering systems of even the most
lowly regarded countries. They know their business.
There is an ongoing worldwide conspiracy and anyone who even thinks of
speaking out is swiftly silenced.
Who has the strenght and reach to completely silence (own?) universities, medias,
governments etc., and nations worldwide?

There are around 200 countries, even if just the president was in on 9/11 that is about 200 people that must keep their mouth shut. This is not
counting the vice presidents, their generals, the intelligence community, etc. You could easily begin to involve thousands of people. Naturally nobody
can keep a conspiracy this big a secret.

This basically disproves the notion that the whole world is in bed with the U.S government.

But this doesn't answer the question about why nobody (beside Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who is evil as well) has come out and accused the U.S government of
staging 9/11.

So do most world leaders really believe the official story?
I find this hard to believe since I, who have nothing more then a computer and an internet connection can figure out the 9/11 lie. Why couldn't other
leaders use their intelligence community to figure it out? But like I said before, they all can't be in on it.

OK. So since there must be an explanation, and an all encompassing one at that,
Let rip! What is the best you can come up with?

Ask yourself how People get in power in the first place?
What is controlled opposition?

Here is a good start on the deceptin of the other countries besides Britian ( who murdered David Kelly the weapoms inspector just as he was about to
verify Saddams inventory statements and then covered it up..also see the Downing street memo below)

"A hoax on the American people, the international community, and the United Nations Security Council."

That is how Secretary of State General Colin Powell’s February 2003 Iraq WMD speech to the UN was described last Friday (Feb. 3) on PBS by one who
ought to know, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to Secretary Powell.

The Downing Street "Memo" is actually the minutes of a meeting, transcribed during a gathering of many of the British Prime Minister's senior
ministers on July 23, 2002. Published by The Sunday Times on May 1, 2005 this document was the first hard evidence from within the UK or US
governments that exposed the truth about how the Iraq war began.

Since that time, much more information has come to light through leaks of secret government documents and the accounts of an increasing number of
people who have witnessed the administration’s wrongdoing firsthand.

There is now in the public record a large body of evidence that vividly illustrates:

Bush’s long-standing intent to invade Iraq
Bush’s willingness to provoke Saddam (in a variety of ways) into providing a pretext for war
The fact that the war effectively began with an air campaign nearly a year before the March 2003 invasion and months before Congressional approval for
the use of force
The administration’s widespread effort to crush dissent and manipulate information that would counter its justification for war
The lack of planning for the war’s aftermath and a fundamental lack of understanding of the Iraqi society
Even as the Bush presidency winds down, a recent Senate investigation final report shows how the administration manipulated information to overstate
the WMD threat and conjure up a connection between Saddam Hussein and Al Quaida that did not exist.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.