As Pro/Instigator, my opponent has the burden of proof of supporting both his claims. He's chosen a speed debate format, so I'll focus primarily on his second claim. If he can't prove this second claim, his resolution fails.

Argument #1: The Bible is not ALL made up.

The Book of Exodus describes a king addressed as Pharaoh who built the city of Rameses, had a royal residence there, reigned long enough for Moses to grow up, and commanded an army that utilized chariots. All of these are facts associated with Rameses II of Egypt's 19th dynasty. Thus, the claim the bible was entirely made up is false.

Exodus 1:11: They built Pithom and Rameses as store cities for PharaohExodus 2:2: She became pregnant and gave birth to a sonExodus 2:7: One day, after Moses had grown upExodus 14:14: He set out with all his chariots, including the six hundred finest.

Egyptian kings were addressed as "Pharaoh" beginning in the 18th dynasty. [1] Rameses was built by Rameses II (1279-1213 BCE). "Rameses II was also the king who.. made it his great Delta residence called Piramesse ('house of Rameses'), the Rameses of biblical tradition." [2] Note the construction of the city of Rameses including a royal residence there, and the 34-year reign consistent with the length that the bible requires of him. Egypt was well-known for their use of chariots, which were introduced in the 15th dynasty. [3]

My opponent has supported neither of his two claims, nor addressed my reasonable counter-arguments. Additionally, he's forfeited the first two rounds of his own debate. I therefore rest my case, for now.