That's what happens when you replace Quality with Equality. Thank your MSM. Chicago gets fatality updates weekly. It sounds like it is the murder capital. Is it? This is what you get when you ban GUNS. The criminal don't obey the laws, they have all the guns they want. Black lives don't matter to black people in Chicago.My question is Why can't all Chicagoans arm themselves? The only thing they don't have is constitutional carry. Do they have a right to conceal carry? If not the gun doesn't do them any good if they can't carry it. Law should be passed allowing concealed carry. The only solution now is to completely take the gang-bangers physically off the street and put them in a cage for the rest of their lives.Looks like the city with the toughest gun control laws is not too safe. I thought by having all of these gun control laws was supposed to make it safer. How's that working out? Poverty and hopelessness leads to lashing out / violence. In USA it's gun violence. In Middle East, they become ISLAMIC terrorists. CHICAGO does not even have gun stores - very strict gun control laws. That "solution" is working "well".

Bev Harris of blackboxvoting.orggives Alex Jones the full details on how the elite are planning to steal the election. Comments below the video:- Lin Speir:"Absolutely disgusting corruption."- MUSTANG115hp:"Why have electronic voting? Canada uses paper ballots. I have been a scrutineer in two elections and all the ballots are double checked within an hour of polls closing. Electronic voting is open to fraud.﻿"- Mr J:"Drain the swamp already! It's overflowing with corrupt lying politicians and globalists. TRUMP 2016 ! "- Lyle Wiley:"Just watching FOXNEWS saying Trumps ties to Russia is like nothing seen before!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FOXNEWS has been turned left, it's disgusting!! DOES TRUMP KNOW THIS VOTE FRAUD INFO?????﻿"- EDTHEWATERGUY:"Trump has already started draining out the swamp by repeatedly exposing the snakes.﻿" 147 likes - Emily Matthews:"This is big, I don't know where I'd get this information if I didn't have infowars, I feel sorry for people who still get their news from the main stream media." 379 likes

- Cole's World:"Voter fraud should carry at least 10 years in prison. Those who get caught usually get a slap on the wrist. Pitiful...﻿" 214 likes

“The best way to help Israel… is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad"- on Nov. 30, 2015 Hillary Clinton states her reason to help armed groups to overthrow democratically elected president of Syria Bashar Assad.Don’t Call Him “Bernie” Anymore: the Sanders Sell-Out and the Clinton Wars to Comeby GARY LEUPPThe worst disservice Sanders has done to his supporters, other than to lead them on a wild goose chase for real change, is to virtually ignore his rival’s vaunted “experience.” He need not have mentioned Hillary Clinton’s Senate record, since there was nothing there; her stint as law-maker was merely intended to position her for a run for the presidency, according to the family plan. But there was a lot in her record as Secretary of State.As she recounts in her memoir, she wanted a heftier “surge” in Afghanistan than Obama was prepared to order. Anyone paying attention knows that the entire military mission in that broken country has been a dismal failure producing blow-back on a mind-boggling scale, even as the Taliban has become stronger, and controls more territory, than at any time since its toppling in 2001-2002.Hillary wanted to impose regime change on Syria in 2011, by stepping up assistance to armed groups whom (again) anyone paying attention knows are in cahoots with al-Nusra (which is to say, al-Qaeda). In an email dated Nov. 30, 2015, she states her reason: “The best way to help Israel…is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad.”In her memoir she criticizes Obama for not doing more to oust the secular Assad regime. She has repeatedly stated during her campaign that she favors a no-fly zone over Syria, like the one she advocated for Libya. That means conflict with Russia, which is bombing sites in Syria, with the permission of its internationally recognized government, under what Russia’s leaders (and many rational people) consider to be terrorists’ control.

y Dan Cahalin:"Consider the report provided by James V. Grimaldi and Rebecca Ballhaus of the Wall Street Journal who reveal the donations received from six foreign governments by the Clinton Foundation. Grimaldi and Ballhaus write,The Clinton Foundation has dropped its self-imposed ban on collecting funds from foreign governments and is winning contributions at an accelerating rate, raising ethical questions as Hillary Clinton ramps up her expected bid for the presidency.Recent donors include the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Australia, Germany and a Canadian government agency promoting the Keystone XL pipeline. . . .United Arab Emirates, a first-time donor, gave between $1 million and $5 million in 2014, and the German government—which also hadn’t previously given— contributed between $100,000 and $250,000.A previous donor, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, has given between $10 million and $25 million since the foundation was created in 1999. Part of that came in 2014, although the database doesn’t specify how much.The Australian government has given between $5 million and $10 million, at least part of which came in 2014. It also gave in 2013, when its donations fell in the same range.Qatar’s government committee preparing for the 2022 soccer World Cup gave between $250,000 and $500,000 in 100 2014. Qatar’s government had previously donated between $1 million and $5 million.161

Oman, which had made a donation previously, gave an undisclosed amount in 2014. Over time, Oman has given the foundation between $1 million and $5 million. Prior to last year, its donations fell in the same range.The Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin expands on the report in her article entitled “Foreign Donations To Foundation Raise Major Ethical Questions For Hillary Clinton,” where she statesThe foundation of course provides luxury travel for Hillary Clinton and her spouse, a high-visibility platform and access to mega-donors.162 She is beholden in a meaningful sense to its donors. No presidential candidate can justify a conflict of interest of this magnitude; it is not merely the appearance of conflict but actual conflict of interest.If former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell (R) might go to jail for receiving lavish gifts for a donor for whom he made a few phone calls, what would be the remedy if, once in office, Hillary Clinton extended her office not only to make calls but also to approve policy and financial arrangements worth billions back to these countries? How will the American people ever be satisfied we are getting her undivided loyalty? No matter how much she protests, her judgment would be questioned as influenced by gratitude toward the foundation’s wealthy patrons. And, of course, a president cannot recuse himself or herself from dealings, so there is no practical way to avoid the conflict.It is bad enough when Clinton takes gobs of money in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs oil and chemical companies, and other titans of industry — although that, too, raises the potential for conflicts of interest.163 But a foreign government should never have any claim on the loyalty of a U.S. president, which is why foreign donations directly to a campaign are illegal. We cannot give her a pass simply because her entity is a “foundation,” not a PAC or campaign entity.164Yet the initial reports only told part of the story. These six countries were not the only national governments who donated money to the Clinton Foundation. Other donations came rolling in from China and donors who were also closely connected to Chinese intelligence."The rest is here http://netteandme.blogspot.com/2016/07/part-3the-difference-it-makes36-reasons.html​​

WE LIVE IN WAR ECONOMY...- Bobby A.:"So wait, my money in the bank can be taken?"

- The Rusty Fishplate:"Sad to see what America has decayed into. It isn't even capitalist anymore. It's an oligarchy and oligopoly..."

- Chuck Dellano+The Rusty Fishplate:"JEWLIGARKY﻿!"

- Brandon Blount:"Jesus Lord help this man's word get out to everyone, please Lord.﻿" 70 Likes

- WTF BBQ+Brandon Blount:"Uhhh, that's your job. You gotta go out there and teach people. Spread the links to your social media outlets, etc... Jesus has already done his job, it's our turn to finish what he started. Also pray that we can wake up 10% of the world's population. When we reach that number (700 million), the 100th monkey phenomenon will do the rest.﻿﻿"

- Izidors Ārvaldis+WTF BBQ:"Even here in Baltic states we are awake, because we see, what's going on in USA, and future things at this side of globe doesn't look bright too. I personally hate Hilary for her words she said after USA killed Qaddafi and after that completely destroyed all Africa. "We came, We saw, He died hahahahahaaaaarrrghhh﻿"... She is a MONSTER!"

- WTF BBQ+Izidors Ārvaldis:"Oh, she mentioned it publicly that they are losing the propaganda war. They know, that People are waking up. She is just a puppet for the ruling class. They are afraid of the people waking up to their bullshit. When 10% of the world's population wake up, you'll see the rest of the world catch up like wild fire. This is why they spent Billions and Billions of dollars on TV, Internet, Radio, and billboards full of lies and propaganda coupled with Fluoride in the drinking water, and poisons in the vaccines. All of it is to make sure you don't ever wake up!"

- Izidors Ārvaldis+WTF BBQ:"World has seen all the blood that those in power are splashing all around the globe, world is becoming tired of bullshit and propaganda, but fear is the key of continuity of this shit hole... That's the shit! And that's how it works.﻿"

​by Bob Livingstonhttp://personalliberty.com/zionism-and-the-drivers-of-american-foreign-policy/The rank-and-file left’s favorite political bogy is the Koch brothers. The right’s is George Soros. Yet neither of these addresses the real driver of American presidential politics and influencer of American foreign policy: the Zionist lobby. But the poverty of the soul or mind of its representatives cannot be contained with wealth or power.That’s because whether Democrat or Republican, it doesn’t matter in the United States: Politicians run to Israel’s side like dogs to fresh meat. And the pro-Israel lobby pours millions of dollars into campaign coffers on both sides of the aisle and controls most U.S. mainstream media and the think tanks that distribute foreign policy papers and lobby the American people through the mainstream media for more foreign wars.For Democrat politicians, it’s for the votes as much as it’s for the money. By and large, Jewish voters vote Democrat. But for Republican politicians it’s for the money contributed by a small number of rich Jews and activists and to appease the evangelical right which believes — based on an errant view of Holy Scripture, as I explained in “Israel, ISIS and the end of days” — that Israel deserves some sort of divine dispensation from the U.S. In fact, polls show that American Christians hold a more favorable opinion of Israel than do American Jews. Most Personal Liberty® readers, I’ve found, have a great tolerance of our criticism of U.S. government and its leaders; but let me or one of our writers criticize Israel or U.S. policy toward it, and the long knives come out.​Now with the campaign season in full bore, GOP candidates are parading to kiss the ring of the man who seeks to be the Republican kingmaker, Sheldon Adelson (at age 82, health problems hamper Adelson’s mobility, so candidates must run to him and readily do so).The Republican primary — at for least those trying to catch up to Donald Trump — has become less about attracting American voters and more about attracting the lion’s share of Adelson’s billions of dollars. In 2012, Adelson single-handedly kept Newt Gingrich’s campaign going long past its expiration date, thanks to an infusion of $20 million in campaign cash; and GOP contenders want that same crutch to lean on. When the Gingrich campaign finally flamed out, Adelson dumped $30 million into Mitt Romney’s campaign coffers. Reports are that all told, Adelson spent some $100 million opposing Barack Obama’s re-election in 2012.

by CHRISS W. STREET Wheeler, Markey and BoxerFCC Chairman Tom Wheeler recently acknowledged that the two Democrats on the commission had decided to avoid Congressional input regarding the Internet by adopting President Franklin Roosevelt’s 1934 Communications Act to regulate the Internet with the same federal control as the old AT&T customer monopoly. To make sure that libertarian advocates would remain in the dark, Wheeler “embargoed” release of any of the specifics in the new administrative “policy” that will act as law…

OPINION“I'm 80 years old. I was never scared throughout the Cold War years. I'm very scared now.” That is what Stephen Lendman, a Research Associate for the Centre for Research on Globalization told Sputnik in an exclusive interview regarding recent developments related to the military conflict in Ukraine.