Sunday, 14 September 2014

Ian Paisley departs

Well it had to happen. Ian Paisley has finally gone to the great Orange Lodge in the sky.

Norman Tebbit says that 'although many accused him of sacrificing principles for office, I think that it was a genuine acceptance on his part that unless sacrifices were made on both sides, there could be no settlement and only enduring strife in Northern Ireland.' Well Norman I think you're plain wrong. Paisley went back on everything he professed to believe in and only after he had spent his whole career setting both communities against one another and undermining any attempt at reconciliation.

The last minute conversion came about only because the British deployed the one decisive weapon they had hitherto carefully avoided: The money spigot. The leadership of both communities could have and would have continued their endless and sterile arguments ad infinitum had not the British Government threatened to close down the Stormont Assembly, and of far greater importance, terminate the pay cheques of all its members.

Bingo! A solution was found within weeks, angels supped with devils while Martin McGuinness and Ian Paisley became known as the Chuckle Brothers. It seems that they did become genuine friends given that McGuinness privately visited Big Ian right up till a few days before his death but my verdict on Ian Paisley is that he arguably did more than any single person to prolong Northern Ireland's inter-communal violence and that his late life turnaround was down to personal ambitions rather than any commitment to peace.

39 comments:

Anonymous
said...

ALAWAYS admired the good rev,told it like he thought it should be told,didnt want to live under the free state leadership,didnt trust the catholic clergy,so whats the big deal?we had a theroey about him that you may or may not agree on.we beleive that if he lived in another time and another place he would of been a signer of the American Declaration of Independence or a drafter of the US constitution he had a mind set of that sort and a true rebel spirit,all of the great men of this ilk came from the No, of Ireland Jefferson,Adams,Hancock,were all of noerthern irish extraction,he would of fit right in,God Speed Sir.

Got to agree, I think he smelt the brimstone he was so fond of in his latter years and saw the fiery gates looming.What he "got" for his community was no different from the Sunningdale power sharing agreement in 1974, an agreement he helped to destroy.Slow learner indeed.

My memories of the REV IAN PAISLEY!!! are from Westminster politics and not really Northern Ireland, of which I knew next to nothing about, and had little interest in (a South African living in the UK).

In any event, I thought he had a real presence about him, that came across as someone with character and an actual personality - unlike your typical smarmy nobody that usually is the case for almost all politicians.

I remember when Edwina Currie introduced a private members bill, during John Major's highly ineffectual premiership, about lowering the homo age of consent from 21 to 16, the only MP that made a decent comment on the issue (during the Commons debate) was the REV IAN PAISLEY!!!

The Labourites and Lib Debasers were all about "tolerance" and "equality" while some of the Tories were all about "down with poofters" mantra (though you'd certainly not hear that today) but, when the REV IAN PAISLEY!!! spoke, he made it clear that Parliament and lawmakers should be trying to help troubled young men, and not place snares in front of them that could lead to a confused and unhealthy lifestyle.

In other words, he didn't condemn homos - rather showed compassion, but neither did he talk a load of bollox about how being homo is just fine and dandy, which it isn't. What was also noticeable was that none of the other MP's, on both sides, heckled him when he spoke. Probably because he was a strong character, and the feeble of character usually shut up in the presence of such.

However, this being an Irish site, I'm well aware that opinions of the REV IAN PAISLEY!!! are naturally going to be primarily about the affairs of Northern Ireland. And, as stated, I knew/know little about that.

In any event, there are some politicians who I admire/d, to Left and Right, and the REV IAN PAISLEY!!! was one of them.

Just finished a 12 hour fishing session off Brighton Marina, got radio ready for journey home..Radio 4skin: Shipping forecast, no thanks, so decided on Radio 2..dammit! "Beautiful Noise" by JEW Neil Diamond...then the presenter spoke..JEW Vanessa Feltz! then she played a record by..JEW Mama Css!

Oh well, lets catch up on some non-taxing TV before sleep.."8 out of ten cats does countdown",,withJEW Rachel Riley andKIKE David Baddiel!

Rogue, all true what you say about Paisley. He could have been a powerful voice - in every sense - for WN and against our destroyers. Instead he devoted most of his life to fomenting dissent, most of it violent - between the two communities in NI. Looking at it narrowly this leads us less well situated to counter the black and muslim waves who land on our shores daily.

..and then I wake up, first face I see on TV is..JEW Micheal Rosen, the UK's "best-selling" "award -winning" children's author, talking about.."racism"..."genocide" "being called a geek is the same as being called "the n-word" or "queer"., etc etc"

(On Channel 5, 'The Wright Stuff')

One caller rings in to say that "as far as Im concerned, Hitler and Martin Luther King were the same.."

The whole northern Ireland business is ridiculously anachronistic. The silence by all political and military factions up there with regards to the invasion of this island by third world hordes shows them all up for the self serving, insignificant, treasonous cunts they are.

3000 dead over three decades in the "troubles"? Laughable. This will be dwarfed by the raped and murdered Irish people over the coming years.

The actors in the north will not even get a mention in the history books, their "struggle" is nothing compared to what's in store for all white Europeans.

do we continue to fund an organisation which runs pedophile rings (which has been fairly well established in my opinion) and is complicit in terrorist activity?

So stop giving money to the BBC. We all know that the BBC forcefully and relentlessly promotes white genocide too, so it is a thoroughly corrupt and irredeemable organisation. They also made fake anti-Serb propaganda in the Balkan war, but failed to really state the importance of the fact that 400,000 Serbs and Jews were driven out of Kosovo (their orthodox church's equivalent of Jerusalem) by Muslims and the UN let it happen.

In reference to the Ulster Unionist Party's Jewish candidate, Harold Smith, he said, "The Unionist party are boasting he (Harold Smith) is a Jew. As a Jew, he rejects our Lord Jesus, the New Testament, Protestant principles, the Glorious Reformation and the sanctity of the Lord's day. The Protestant throne and the Protestant constitution are nothing to him."

ON LBC this morning I was listening to this putrid kike festering as an MP in Ilford, - Michael Gapes. This creature is a visceral anti white kike who has personally facilitated the importation of countless numbers of non whites into London including MUSLIMS!

It now wants British troops to attack Assad's Syria before doing anything about the ISIS scourge which he tepidly says are also 'terrorists'

Work that one out !

Kikes in host European countries and elsewhere calling on the goyim cattle to protect their godforsaken 'shitty' little country (French quote) Israhell whilst getting maimed and killed in the process.

No doubt the mudslimes residing in Ilford are aware of this yiddisher fuck's double standards

Ella Rose [President of the Union of Jewish Students] accused the NUS NEC of withholding Jewish students the right to self identify the PREJUDICE THEY SUFFER [LOL!!!], and condemned their accusation that FABRICATED ANTI-SEMITISM WAS USED FOR POLITICAL GAIN BY UJS.

She criticised the implication that UJS were USING ACCUSATIONS OF ANTI-SEMITISM FOR POLITICAL GAIN, and that experiences of anti-Semitism were thus VOID.

She also stresses that “the greater issue is the FAILURE TO AFFORD JEWISH STUDENTS the respect any other MINORITY would receive” [hahaha], outlining the right jewish students should have to self-define their identity, and what is considered prejudice against that. http://www.jewishnews.co.uk/ujs-president-nuss-nec/

Leon Reich, chairman of Likud South Africa called Tutu “the latest self-appointed midget of history” who wants to destroy the Jewish people, and said Tutu would “kill Jews before protecting Christians...”

Accompanying the Op-Ed was a photo showing Tutu wearing a Hitler moustache superimposed on Hitler’s body.http://www.jewishjournal.com/world/article/jewish_publication_apologizes_for_op_ed_comparing_tutu_to_hitler

The Tide Turns Against Zio-Tryanny: More Public Figures Stand Up for Dr. Duke’s Work!

The latest group of people to join the ranks of those who have broken the chains of Zionist censorship have been a brave group of medical professionals, who have publicly declared their opposition to the Zio-genocide in Gaza in the famous British journal, The Lancet.

Stung by the bold move, the Zio-thought police in the west have swung into action [LOL!!!]. They immediately sent their agents out to scour the personal lives of these brave people who dared to oppose the Zionist tyranny, and, after digging through Dr Manduca’s postings to a Google News Group called Sempre Contro la Guerra (“Always Against the War”) they discovered that this professor had dared to recommend to that newsgroup that they watch a video by Dr, David Duke called CNN, Goldman Sachs & the Zio Matrix.

Dr. Ang, who was deported from Israel after she tried to carry out humanitarian medical work in Gaza, wrote in her email:

“Dear Friends This is shocking video please watch. This is not about Palestine – it is about all of us! SEE THIS VIDEO BEFORE IT IS REMOVED FROM CIRCULATION – Please do pass on to others who you think would be interested and would pass on>>> The whole world needs to know.”

The Zio-censors are now trying to attack Drs. Manduca and Ang because they dared recommend Dr. Duke’s documentary—but so far they have only succeeded in drawing even more attention to the video, which now has nearly three-quarter of a million views, most within the past few months.

The tide is without any doubt turning. More and more people are willing to stand up and defy the Zio-dictators, and once enough people have the courage, once enough people stand up and speak out, the era of Zio-tyranny will be over.

In yet another astonishing bout of blatant Jewish Supremacist hypocrisy, WJC president Ronald Lauder said that “European voters risk giving their countries a bad name” by electing what he called “far-right politicians”—which, viewed in Jewish terms, means anyone who wants to keep Europe European.

...viewed through the prism of Jewish Supremacy, Jews who want to preserve Israel for Jews, are ‘good’ and even ‘holy’, but anybody else—and Europeans in particular—who want to preserve their countries for their own people are ‘evil’ and will ‘give their nations a bad name.’

This leader of world Jewry also “pointed to the threat posed by radicalized Muslims returning from Syria and Iraq.”

The irony of this attack lies in the two facts:

-Firstly, Jewish organizations in Europe—and America—have been at the forefront of promoting the “open borders” policy for all Western nations (while, of course, pursuing the exact opposite policy for their own state of Israel) and thus are actually now complaining about a phenomena which they largely created themselves; and

-Secondly, that the very conflicts in the Middle East to which Lauder refers, were created and generated by the Zionist lobby in America and Europe in the first place.

The staggering irony—and chutzpah—of the leader of World Jewry now blaming Europeans for policies which Zionist fanatics Jewish Supremacy created, provides yet another window into the paranoiac and utterly deceitful mind of Jewish Supremacy—and why there will never be world peace until this malevolent force is finally overthrown.

Outraged Swiss village of 1,000 residents forced to raise taxes after African refugee mother-of-seven moves there and costs them £40,000 a month in benefits

A village of just 1,000 residents in Switzerland has been forced to raise taxes because an African refugee and her seven children cost the local authority £40,000 in benefits every month.

Hagenbuch, in the Swiss canton of Zurich, is understood to be spending close to a third of its total annual budget on the family after they arrived from Eritrea in East Africa three years ago.

The massive benefits bill covers day-to-day living expenses such as groceries and cleaning costs, as well as paying for four of the woman's children to be housed in an orphanage and even bills for general entertainment - such as guided tours of local attractions and entry fees for the zoo.

When the woman and her family arrived in Hagenbuch three years ago, the municipal government immediately agreed to cover the full cost of their rent and £1,700 a month in living expenses.

Why did the media refer to him as Doctor Ian Paisley when his thesis was from a make believe university whereas Doctor Michael Looter King had a real doctorate from a real university with a fake thesis?

I would have thought an ethno-nationalist like yourself would have supported someone like Paisley who spoke the truth and stood up for his own people and their right to a homeland. Instead you come out with this "two communities" bollocks. You are a typical Irish Republican hypocrite who cannot see that the Irish solution was the border with 2 homelands for each. Good fences and good neighbours and all that.

@17.24, If I infer correctly (and your point is unclear, less heat and more light are in order) that the 'native Irish' should have gone south of the border then you're on dangerous territory because they were the original inhabitants, at least they were there long before the 'planters' came in.

Sauce for the goose and all that.

And I was not suggesting any such thing. You can say Paisley fought for his own people but he lead them down the garden path, a path which he smartly stepped off once the Brits threatened to cut off his money spigot. In the process he reneged on everything he stood for, or claimed to stand for. This was all after he, for selfish career purposes, put the two communities (how else would you describe the situation?) at one another's throats for decades, scuppering any chance of a peaceful settlement. That is the central point of my post. If you think he was good for 'his people' - or indeed any people other than his family and cronies - you must be very naive.