If not for any other reason, a film centering on the Hulk rather than Banner won't happen because of the sheer cost of animationg him. That is, unless you want a Hulk that looks significantly less good and detailed than The Avengers-Hulk.

We are talking 2016. ILM is in house now. I am sure they can scrap together a project for 250 million tops. That's staggering, but not back breaking this day and age. With any luck, the movie can easily double it's budget world wide. Again, we are assuming this is the direct followup to Avengers 2, so you got that going for it. If Hulk gets jettisoned into space, people are going to want to know what the deal is. It doesn't kill the momentum from Avengers 2. If you open PIII with Ant-Man or Black Panther, you kill the momentum.

We are talking 2016. ILM is in house now. I am sure they can scrap together a project for 250 million tops. That's staggering, but not back breaking this day and age. With any luck, the movie can easily double it's budget world wide. Again, we are assuming this is the direct followup to Avengers 2, so you got that going for it. If Hulk gets jettisoned into space, people are going to want to know what the deal is. It doesn't kill the momentum from Avengers 2. If you open PIII with Ant-Man or Black Panther, you kill the momentum.

Ant Man is opening Phase 3, November 2015.

Anyway, Vile pointed out on the last page that Ain't it Cool News are saying Planet Hulk/WWH isn't happening, El Mayimbe got it wrong.

__________________

In flight there is serenity - the motion out, the space between,
The promise of each new life - and possibility.

Swallow flies south before the fall, before the winter can call...
Can call in each borrower - for what was given

Didn't realize Ant-Man was official. But even so, the May movie is the big one to pay attention too. Maybe ASM 3 goes into that slot. But Marvel tends to have a big movie there. Fantastic Four? Thor 3? If Marvel/Disney want something big, it would be Hulk. I don't see an alternative.

Well, if Fox ever ramps it up with that project, a summer release may be more profitable. Maybe they'd put it off a year if they can lock down a solid release date. What's coming in in 2015 in terms of comic book movies aside from that an Avengers? I don't know anything scheduled for later that year off the top of my head. Star Wars 7 Memorial Day and Pirates 5 around July, but nothing else rings a bell. I don't buy Justice League or MoS 2 making that year. That's why we need a ****ing Planet Hulk movie.

Well, if Fox ever ramps it up with that project, a summer release may be more profitable. Maybe they'd put it off a year if they can lock down a solid release date. What's coming in in 2015 in terms of comic book movies aside from that an Avengers? I don't know anything scheduled for later that year off the top of my head. Star Wars 7 Memorial Day and Pirates 5 around July, but nothing else rings a bell. I don't buy Justice League or MoS 2 making that year. That's why we need a ****ing Planet Hulk movie.

possibly. That all depends IF hulk actually gets sent away in avengers 2. Which I sorta doubt. Also, as Dent said before, phase 3 won't be Hulk centered. Avengers 3 will not be world war hulk. It will probably just be a small part, factoring into a bigger story. Antman is the start to phase 3. Ultron will more than likely be the MAIN villain in phase 3, for avengers 3. In an avengers franchise, Ultron is WAY more important for an avengers movie than WWH. With antman kicking off phase 3, bet my ass that Ultron will be the main villain. If there is a planet hulk/wwh part to it, it will probably only be a small role. And I bet it will have to do with Ultron somehow tricking people into getting Hulk into space. Hulk doesn't know about it, he returns pissed off at the people who sent him away, attacks. Battle. He learns it was Ultron. Ultron plot continues.

So Ultron following Thanos? That's kind of a step down don't ya think? Anyone other villain that can supplement a void like Thanos should he be the main villain in A2? Don't think so. Masters of Evil might be a safer pick, but considering it may take place in space, probably not.

Well Whedon just shot it down. How much longer before Nolan debunks LR's report of him helming every DC film, Snyder doing JLA, and Christian Bale returning as Batman?

LR used to be really reputable. They're really letting us down.

__________________

This is why I say it's the ballot or the bullet.
It's liberty or it's death.
It's freedom for everybody or freedom for nobody.
America today finds herself in a unique situation... to become involved in a bloodless revolution

Without dialog? He's still just a big SFX blob? Body language can only get you so far and it's an incredibly poor substitute for being able to actually speak.

You don't need dialogue to have personality, which he proved in The Avengers and Incredible Hulk. Also, refer to King Kong, Tom and Jerry, and Silent Bob as more examples. There are more silent characters out there which prove my point as well.

El Mayimbe is letting us down. This seems like a good time to point out that the most recent IM3 trailer appears to have proven every single scoop Latino Review had about that movie last year to be correct, except for the Stan Lee cameo, which remains to be seen.
Latino Review's IM3 Exclusives from last year:

-Return of the Ten Rings
-Extremis
-Kingsley is the Mandarin (which Marvel was denying at the time), but that he is really 2nd fiddle to Killian.
-Tony Stark fighting the Mandarin with an army of unmanned suits.
-The "Iron Patriot" really being War Machine decked out.
-Stan's cameo as a beauty pageant judge.

All essentially confirmed by the new trailer except the blacked out stuff, and one of those was pretty much confirmed in an interview with James Badge Dale.

Also, the AICN scoop about Nova further validates what LR first reported when they broke the scoop about GotG in the first place:

All of those exclusives were reported by Da7e at LR, who has proven himself quite consistently to be a reputable source. El Mayimbe, less so. But I think it's silly to write off the whole site's credibility - when they've continually provided more accurate Marvel scoops than anyone - because one obnoxious guy there has a hit-and-miss track record.

__________________

"They say: sufferings are misfortunes...Once we're thrown off our habitual paths, we think all is lost; but it's only here that the new and good begins.

As long as there's life, there's happiness. There's much, much still to come."

El Mayimbe is letting us down. This seems like a good time to point out that the most recent IM3 trailer appears to have proven every single scoop Latino Review had about that movie last year to be correct, except for the Stan Lee cameo, which remains to be seen.
Latino Review's IM3 Exclusives from last year:

-Return of the Ten Rings
-Extremis
-Kingsley is the Mandarin (which Marvel was denying at the time), but that he is really 2nd fiddle to Killian.
-Tony Stark fighting the Mandarin with an army of unmanned suits.
-The "Iron Patriot" really being War Machine decked out.
-Stan's cameo as a beauty pageant judge.

All essentially confirmed by the new trailer except the blacked out stuff, and one of those was pretty much confirmed in an interview with James Badge Dale.

Also, the AICN scoop about Nova further validates what LR first reported when they broke the scoop about GotG in the first place:

All of those exclusives were reported by Da7e at LR, who has proven himself quite consistently to be a reputable source. El Mayimbe, less so. But I think it's silly to write off the whole site's credibility - when they've continually provided more accurate Marvel scoops than anyone - because one obnoxious guy there has a hit-and-miss track record.

Thanks for all of that - I actually didn't know about this stuff!

__________________

This is why I say it's the ballot or the bullet.
It's liberty or it's death.
It's freedom for everybody or freedom for nobody.
America today finds herself in a unique situation... to become involved in a bloodless revolution

You don't need dialogue to have personality, which he proved in The Avengers and Incredible Hulk. Also, refer to King Kong, Tom and Jerry, and Silent Bob as more examples. There are more silent characters out there which prove my point as well.

I didn't say you couldn't have personality without dialog. I said doing so was a poor substitute FOR having dialog. And in Hulk's case, completely inaccurate to the source material which is rendered far superior as a result.

__________________
"Spider-man is the Charlie Brown of the Marvel Universe." ~ Kevin Smith

I didn't say you couldn't have personality without dialog. I said doing so was a poor substitute FOR having dialog. And in Hulk's case, completely inaccurate to the source material which is rendered far superior as a result.

It wouldn't be a poor substitute for having dialog if it hasn't been poorly explained at this point. I do see Hulk eventually talking in future movies, but to say he'd be akin to big green blob if he were left silent is an exaggeration, to say the least.

El Mayimbe is letting us down. This seems like a good time to point out that the most recent IM3 trailer appears to have proven every single scoop Latino Review had about that movie last year to be correct, except for the Stan Lee cameo, which remains to be seen.
Latino Review's IM3 Exclusives from last year:

-Return of the Ten Rings
-Extremis
-Kingsley is the Mandarin (which Marvel was denying at the time), but that he is really 2nd fiddle to Killian.
-Tony Stark fighting the Mandarin with an army of unmanned suits.
-The "Iron Patriot" really being War Machine decked out.
-Stan's cameo as a beauty pageant judge.

All essentially confirmed by the new trailer except the blacked out stuff, and one of those was pretty much confirmed in an interview with James Badge Dale.

Also, the AICN scoop about Nova further validates what LR first reported when they broke the scoop about GotG in the first place:

All of those exclusives were reported by Da7e at LR, who has proven himself quite consistently to be a reputable source. El Mayimbe, less so. But I think it's silly to write off the whole site's credibility - when they've continually provided more accurate Marvel scoops than anyone - because one obnoxious guy there has a hit-and-miss track record.

I am writing off the whole site's credibility after El Mayimbe trolled SHH with hot garbage.

After he reported that Bale and Nolan will return for JL, it's hard to take anything he says seriously. There's no way that's ever going to happen.
I also smelled a heaping pile of BS about this planet hulk thing from the beginning. I'm not sure if it was El Mayimbe that reported it or someone else at LR, but it makes zero sense for Marvel to integrate the planet hulk storyline this early in the game. The Hulk proved his use as a good guy in the Avengers and the TIH; why would they choose to send him off planet? I get that maybe they'd do something in phase 2 that could potentially lead to that, but even then I think it's to early in the game for a story of that magnitude.
There are plenty of better stories where you could keep the Hulk on earth they could tell in phase 3. I doubt Marvel would want to tell that particular tale so soon.

I posted this in another thread... I'm just going to throw it in here as well:

I don't believe this guy.

In 2009, I worked for Marvel in the Editorial department in New York City.

Yes, some people from the Film Studio come into the office... But it's mostly to meet important editors (like Wacker, Brevoort, Rosemann, or Axel at the time), glad-hand, take a tour or pick up research. I met Justin Theroux and Scarlett Johansson during the time leading up to Iron Man 2. However, there are very little if any production materials for the films in those offices. That's just a fact.

So knowing that... I find it very hard to believe that this cat found a detailed outline of Avengers 2, Incredible Hulk 2 and Avengers 3... Like he's claiming to know what act of the films certain things happen... This is the COMIC BOOK production office... Not the film studio in Manhattan Beach, CA. This is highly suspect. The New York Office has a Legal, Marketing, Editorial, Publishing, Merchandise and Sales department... All solely related to the COMICS, not the FILMS.

There are some moquettes and movie theater standees and things like that around the office, but at the time I worked there, these were only of films ALREADY released (Iron Man and The Incredible Hulk) and not of films in production.

PLUS, when you sign to work for Marvel, you sign a non-disclosure agreement. And they were very good with security in the building. (NOTE: When I worked there it was located in the old office on 5th Avenue). But I'd imagine the security is the same. This guy, couldn't just walk in and snoop around. You need to be buzzed in, get a guest pass and you have a chaperone with you when you tour the office. If there is something they don't want you to see (ie. their plans for Phase 2 &3) you are not going to see it.

If he said that he knew what was happening in the comics 6-7-8 months from now... I'd believe him. That **** is pinned up all over the walls... But MOVIE news? At the Marvel Offices in New York City.... No. Just not true.