Europe’s Looming Demise: Changes on the Continent Cloud Our Future!

Question: What do we know about a disastrous and suicidal pact called the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership that went into effect in Europe on January 1, 2010 and why should Americans care about this?

The following article reveals that effective January 1, 2010, a disastrous and suicidal pact called the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (Europe/Mediterranean) went into effect with little fanfare or examination, to include from the mainstream media, and warns that Americans should be extremely concerned about this pact because this global gobbledygook is coming to our shores, thanks to our globalist president-You Decide:

“The Europe as you know it from visiting, from your parents or friends is on the verge of collapsing,” Geert Wilders said in a speech in the United States last year.

The leader of the Netherlands’ populist Party for Freedom added: “We are now witnessing profound changes that will forever alter Europe’s destiny and might send the Continent in what Ronald Reagan called ‘a thousand years of darkness.’ “ And not just Europe, but America as well.

Been to Europe lately? Thought it was bad? You ain’t seen nothing yet. The passage of the Lisbon Treaty, hailed by President Obama, nailed the coffin shut on national sovereignty in Europe. The people of Europe fought it, but were overwhelmed by their political elites and the lack of American leadership in this age of our rather Marxist, collectivist U.S. president.

Come Jan. 1, 2010, a disastrous and suicidal pact called the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (Europe/Mediterranean) goes into effect with little fanfare or examination.It boggles the mind that such a consequential and seismic cultural shift could be mandated and put into play without so much as a murmur from the mainstream media.

Why should Americans care about this? Americans have to care because this global gobbledygook is coming to our shores, thanks to our globalist president.

The European human rights group called Stop the Islamization of Europe (SIOE) has been working tirelessly to expose the mass Muslim immigration plan of the Euro-Med Partnership.

A statement on the SIOE Web site criticizes the secrecy of the process: “It was shocking to hear about the plans and at the same time knowing that Danish politicians and a [cowardly] Danish press – who is otherwise proud to be critical – has told nothing to the Danish people about this project which begins in January.

This also showed clearly at the conference. Only very few politicians showed up and no media. Those politicians who showed up had obviously never heard about the Euro-Mediterranean project.

The goal of the Euro-Mediterranean cooperation is to create a new Greater European Union encompassing both Europe and North Africa, with the Mediterranean Sea becoming a domestic Eurabian sea. The goal is to establish a “comprehensive political partnership,” including a “free trade area and economic integration”; “considerably more money for the partners” (that is, more European money flowing into North Africa); and “cultural partnership” – that is, importation of Islamic culture into post-Christian Europe.

According to the SIOE, in the Euro-Med plan “Europe is to be islamized. Democracy, Christianity, European culture and Europeans are to be driven out of Europe. Fifty million North Africans from Muslim countries are to be imported into the EU.”

Skeptical? It’s already happening. The British newspaper the Daily Express reported in October 2008 on “a controversial taxpayer-funded ‘job centre’ “ that opened in Mali at that time as “just the first step towards promoting ‘free movement of people in Africa and the EU.’ Brussels economists claim Britain and other EU states will ‘need’ 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the ‘demographic decline’ due to falling birthrates and rising death rates across Europe.”

To offset this decline, a “blue card” system is to be created that will allow card holders to travel freely within the European Union and have full rights to work – as well as the full right to collect welfare benefits.

A Muslim population from Africa moving freely into Europe threatens America.On Christmas Day, a Nigerian Muslim flew from Amsterdam to Detroit and tried to explode a bomb on the plane – after he was allowed to board the plane without a passport. The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership will make jihad attacks like this one all the easier.

And once in Europe, Muslims have already begun demanding special privileges and accommodations. IslamOnline reported on Dec. 21 that “Muslims activists from 26 European countries have come together to launch the first rights council to enlighten European Muslims about their rights, monitor rising Islamophobia and defend Muslim rights in European courts of law.”

Ali Abu Shwaima, a Muslim leader in Italy, explained: “We think European human rights groups are not doing enough to defend the rights of Muslims. Therefore we thought that we need this new council, especially that all laws and constitutions in Europe respect freedom of religion and oppose all forms of discrimination and racism.”

“Islamophobia,” “discrimination” and “racism” are all terms Muslims in Europe and America use to confuse people into thinking that the perpetrators of Islamic terrorism are the real victims. And it is working: Mr. Wilders is going on trial in the Netherlands, instead of all the Islamic hate sponsors he is fighting against. It has to be this way, to increase harmony among the Muslim and non-Muslim member states of the Euro-Med Partnership.

This internationalism is already destroying what has made Europe free and great. And now Mr. Obama seems to want to do the same to America.

Pamela Geller is the editor and publisher of the Atlas Shrugs Web site. She is the author (with Robert Spencer) of the forthcoming book “The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America” (Simon and Schuster, July 2010).”

SEE NO JIHAD, HEAR NO JIHAD, SPEAK NO JIHAD: “Why the government and media seem oblivious to America’s rapid infiltration by a violent totalitarian movement.”–Posted on the WND’s WhistleBlower Magazine December 2009 Issue:

“Is the U.S. government still serious about protecting Americans from the extreme violence of Islamofascism – or isn’t it?

The Department of Homeland Security, created to defend the nation after the Sept. 11 Islamic terror attacks, has dramatically shifted its focus, earlier this year advising police nationwide to watch out for “right-wing extremists” – especially returning war veterans – supporting the Second Amendment, opposing abortion and illegal immigration, and promoting U.S. sovereignty and the Constitution.

The U.S. Army ignored a mountain of absurdly obvious warning signs that Army psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hasan was a brainwashed, America-loathing jihadist sleeper agent just waiting to explode – yet it did absolutely nothing to avert the Fort Hood massacre of dozens of American soldiers.

Five Gitmo terrorists – the worst of the worst, including confessed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who proclaims the government’s terror charges are a “badge of honor” – will be tried in civilian court in New York City, offering these mega-terrorists the worldwide stage they crave from which to spread their ideology, and opening up America’s terror-war secrets to discovery by the terrorists through their lawyers – all paid for by taxpayers.

Dozens of Islamic terror training camps are operating right under the nose of law enforcement, not in some far-off land, but all across the USA!

What’s going on here? Does the government really care about national security anymore?

You’ll find out the answer to this and many other crucial questions in the explosive December issue of Whistleblower magazine, titled “SEE NO JIHAD, HEAR NO JIHAD, SPEAK NO JIHAD: Why the government and media seem oblivious to America’s rapid infiltration by a violent totalitarian movement.”

More questions:

Why do you suppose, whenever there’s a terror attack on American soil, the FBI always announces immediately – before it could possibly know – that the massacre is not terror-related?

Why do the media concoct the most moronic explanations for terrorism – such as Time magazine blaming post traumatic stress disorder for Hasan’s Fort Hood rampage (even though he was never deployed in a war zone) or the Associated Press’s revelation that the shooter was “lonely”? Or why did the press advance six different theories to explain the terror reign of Beltway sniper John Muhammad, but not one mentioned jihad as a possible motive?

Why does President Obama take every opportunity to criticize America and fawn over Islam – even calling America “one of the largest Muslim countries in the world” and bowing obsequiously before the Muslim king of Saudi Arabia? Meanwhile, Department of Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano, who demonizes pro-lifers and war veterans as Tim McVeigh wannabes, appoints to her advisory council Kareem Shora, national executive director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, whose officials have labeled deadly anti-U.S. jihadists as “heroes” and opposed referring to Hamas as a terrorist organization.

Regular Americans understand the Islamofascist war that’s been declared on America. The government and media either don’t – or won’t.

This stubborn inability to come to grips with an exceedingly dangerous and determined political-military movement wrapped within a religion is explored as you’ve never seen it before in “SEE NO JIHAD, HEAR NO JIHAD, SPEAK NO JIHAD.”

“Terror training camps on American soil” by Robert Spencer, on the dozens of communes teaching jihad throughout the U.S. under the nose of law enforcement

“Military jihadists fill ‘every branch'” of the U.S. military – even Gitmo

“How Saudis radicalized U.S. soldiers,” the astonishing story of how thousands of American troops were converted to Islam by Saudis while protecting that kingdom from Saddam Hussein

“CAIR speaker to Muslims: OK to attack Fort Bragg” – on the popular Muslim cleric who exhorted the Islamic faithful to target planes carrying the “82nd Airborne”

“PC kills” – in which former Arab News broadcaster Brigitte Gabriel warns that American warriors can no longer be intimidated by fear of being accused of “discrimination.”

“Moderate, civil-rights group or sinister terror front?” And FBI agent says CAIR’s “offices have been a turnstile for terrorists and their supporters”

“Belly of the beast” by P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry, who tell the hair-raising story of how 29-year-old Chris Gaubatz grew a beard, pretended to convert to Islam, and infiltrated the terror-tied Council on American-Islamic Relations.

“CAIR spent $160,000 to silence Michael Savage” by Art Moore

“It’s radical Islam, stupid” by Steven Emerson, in which the renowned terror investigator says government and press blindness to dangerous Islamic subversion are now at an advanced stage

“Meet White House adviser who supports Islamic law” by Art Moore, on Obama adviser Dalia Mogahed, who “shares the outlook of Islamists in Egypt, Pakistan”

“Trial in New York a triumph for al-Qaida” by Roger Hedgecock, who argues that the Obama-Holder’ strategy underlying the controversial move is to “criminalize everyone connected with the Bush war on terror”

“Separation of mosque and state” by William J. Federer

“Nothing demonstrates the national security myopia of the Obama administration better than its eagerness to see threats where none exist while being unwilling and unable to see those that are staring us in the face,” said WND Editor Joseph Farah.

Added WND Managing Editor David Kupelian: “The evil of ‘political correctness’ – the totalitarian manipulation of thought, foisted on us by twisted elitists who hate America and everything our soldiers have fought and died for over the last two centuries, and continue to fight and die for – has to end. This issue of Whistleblower explains not only why, but how.”

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to and/or support the above article and/or blog post-You Decide:

Islamization of Europe: The Numbers Don’t Lie!-Posted on Winds of Jihad-By SHEIKYERMAMI-On September 11, 2012:

Follow-up Letter To NM U.S. Senator Udall Requesting Congressional Investigation Into Allegations Made By Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On April 30, 2012:

Cameron’s Multicultural Wake-Up Call: ‘The growth of Islamist extremism in the West is something even the politically correct can no longer ignore.’–Posted on The Wall Street Journal-By DOUGLAS MURRAY-On February 9, 2011:

Three-quarters of non-Muslims believe Islam negative for Britain: “Muslim organisation calls for efforts to improve awareness as four-fifths of those polled admit to little knowledge of the faith”–Posted on Guardian.co.uk-By Haroon Siddique-On August 2, 2010:

Substantially, the post is really the best on this notable topic. I concur with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your incoming updates. Just saying cheers will not just be sufficient, for the exceptional lucidity in your writing. I will directly grab your rss feed to stay abreast of any updates. Delightful work and much success in your business endeavors!

I really liked reading your post!. Quallity content. With such a valuable blog i believe you deserve to be ranking even higher in the search engines :). Check out the link in my name. That links to a tool that really helped me rank high in google. This way even more people can enjoy your posts and nothing beats a big audiance 😉

This is one of the pernicious effects of affirmative action. In our PC/affirmative action mores, we verge to look upon the achievements and promotions of minorities as a consequence of affirmative strength policies preferably of human being diligence and talent. This undermines these very achievements.
Another delinquent here is that it sets kind-hearted fair play at odds with the higher splendid morality. If the higher decency is customary to judge the Mass murder, ruinous disease outbreaks, etc, as good, while benignant fair play purpose arbitrate them criminal, then the ‘good’ in each of these moralities are different. Good on the higher ideals is not what we property nearby good.