I wrote a SCP tale about taking some pictures of 096 with 978. I would like to know if anyone thinks it's any good before I post it to the site. It's in my sandbox, http://scpsandbox2.wikidot.com/drchandra . Thanks!

“Do we really need to be wasting a D-class on this?” Chandra asked chidingly, glaring disparagingly at her research partner.

There's a few too many adverbs in this sentence for my taste. "Chidingly," "disparagingly," taken together it feels redundant.

“It’s not like we’re running out of them,” Metzger said casually, not looking up from his notes. Chandra rolled her eyes at the disregard for Human life that was sadly all too common among her colleagues.

Even if I wasn't completely tired of this subject, this is a really hamfisted way to be making your point. Your description is adressing the reader directly in a really overt manner, and instead of reading a story I feel like I'm reading a polemic. The unvarnished opinions of random strangers on the internet are seldom interesting. Also, "human" is not capitalized in this context.

You should just be glad she didn’t wander into 173’s cell while she was there. That would have ended badly. Crunch!

“I hope Clef feeds you to 682!” Chandra said vehemently.

These two lines are just hideous.

“Look, you don’t have to say how we got the photos if you don’t want to. Redacted, Data Expunged, whatever.”

The way you've written this, it's unclear who's saying this line.

may eventually lead to discovering a fatal weakness.

I'm not sure scientists would describe information assisting in terminating an anomaly as a "fatal weakness"; that's a term that I would expect to see in a video game or something.

We are conducting this experiment underground to determine what effect, if any, nearly a mile of solid earth will have at impeding 096’s progress.

I'm unsure as to the point of this. Considering that this is something that is able to travel to the depths of the ocean to murderize people, I doubt anyone would expect that to make a difference.

I would like to officially state my objection to this experiment. I consider it highly unlikely that we will gain any useful information from this test, making it a waste of Foundation resources as well as posing a significant risk of a containment breach.

I'm fairly certain that as a scientific organization, the Foundation would have provided some sort of avenue to express this view as the experiment was being proposed, not immediately before it's supposed to occur.

“At least we didn’t waste a D-class.”

An extremely odd sentiment from someone that you've portrayed as completely sociopathic in their disregard for human life.

This whole thing, with its subject material and its stock 173 and 682 references (you even got Clef in there for good measure) makes me believe that you haven't really read anything beyond Series 1. There's nothing wrong with that, of course, but it does hinder your ability to write for modern standards, which have evolved significantly since then.

Part of that evolution is a change in the portrayal of human experimentation. The Foundation, in the minds of most, is not really the "feed dozens of people into this deadly anomaly because lolscience" organization that is present in some of the older articles, and so the viewpoint you espouse in this piece and the accompanying arguments around it are kind of old news at this point.

As a piece of writing, there's a lot that's off about it. You have one character (a self-insert, which, why do that when it doesn't add anything and will likely cause you problems among a certain portion of the readership) who is supposedly disgusted by the use of D-Class subjects, yet can't manage anything more than a hissy fit in response and then goes along with the experiments anyway. You have another that is cartoonishly callous, but then somehow overcomes incredible disregard for human life at the last minute because reasons, I guess. These don't strike me as anything resembling actual people. The dialogue, with its alternating turns of goofiness and direct plot exposition, don't really help that problem.

And the experiment. Who in their right mind would approve something like that? Let's leave aside for the moment that you're introducing three anomalous items that don't operate in accordance with principles of reality into the same environment, one of which is actively hostile. I don't see what they hoped to gain from this except some sort of vague "we'll discover its weakness" business, which is an extremely poor justification for an experiment that is virtually certain to result in loss of life. And why the hell does the researcher just run into the testing chamber? "I'm somewhat surprised by these results for some reason, whelp, time to do something suicidally dangerous!" It makes no sense whatsoever, and your other character lampshading it doesn't really make it any better.

There's too many issues with this article. I would recommend scrapping it, and then reading some of the more recent contributions to the wiki to internalize a better idea of what kind of concepts tend to succeed around here.