Comments on: Sharks place Kaspar -- their 2004 first-round pick -- on waivershttp://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/2008/10/20/sharks-place-kaspar-their-2004-first-round-pick-on-waivers/
Curtis Pashelka on the San Jose SharksWed, 16 May 2018 03:05:00 +0000hourly1By: Worcester Sharks STHhttp://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/2008/10/20/sharks-place-kaspar-their-2004-first-round-pick-on-waivers/comment-page-1/#comment-14888
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:02:26 +0000http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/?p=509#comment-14888Having watched him since he came to Worcester, Lucas is hot and cold. Needs more intensity to play in NHL. Hope he gets it here this year. Here in Worcester we are hoping that the ex-67s McGinn and Joslin slip under the SJ radar for another year– they are outstanding. Sharks fans will love them when they get to SJ. Love the new style of play this year. Shoot shoot shoot!
]]>By: Easyhttp://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/2008/10/20/sharks-place-kaspar-their-2004-first-round-pick-on-waivers/comment-page-1/#comment-14887
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:02:49 +0000http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/?p=509#comment-14887David,
I believe Riley Armstrong must go through waivers. The others that you specified are correct. Another who would not have to clear is Jamie McGinn. It is also the opinion of kdb at HF that Vesce, a summer signee, would not have to clear.
]]>By: Jeff D.http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/2008/10/20/sharks-place-kaspar-their-2004-first-round-pick-on-waivers/comment-page-1/#comment-14886
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:55:29 +0000http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/?p=509#comment-14886I missed it the first time I read the article in my first post (#34), but did anybody else notice that the Rangers put Rissmiller on waivers?
]]>By: SoCalSharksGirlhttp://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/2008/10/20/sharks-place-kaspar-their-2004-first-round-pick-on-waivers/comment-page-1/#comment-14885
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:17:53 +0000http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/?p=509#comment-14885Nevermind 🙂
]]>By: SoCalSharksGirlhttp://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/2008/10/20/sharks-place-kaspar-their-2004-first-round-pick-on-waivers/comment-page-1/#comment-14884
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:15:28 +0000http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/?p=509#comment-14884So did he clear waivers?
]]>By: Jeff D.http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/2008/10/20/sharks-place-kaspar-their-2004-first-round-pick-on-waivers/comment-page-1/#comment-14883
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:03:04 +0000http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/?p=509#comment-14883I was just reading another hockey article and it mentioned that Kaspar cleared waivers this morning. On a side note, apparently, he’s now a defenseman. 😉

]]>By: Smaverhttp://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/2008/10/20/sharks-place-kaspar-their-2004-first-round-pick-on-waivers/comment-page-1/#comment-14882
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:21:53 +0000http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/?p=509#comment-14882Can someone please explain. If we can send down and bring up players from the miners throughout the yesr, why not Mclarren(sp?) sense he cleared waivers? I am sure Kasper will be back now that he has cleared as well. How is salery cap an issue?
]]>By: Will Fhttp://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/2008/10/20/sharks-place-kaspar-their-2004-first-round-pick-on-waivers/comment-page-1/#comment-14881
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:27:46 +0000http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/?p=509#comment-14881Thank you for expanding my knowledge.
]]>By: yhttp://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/2008/10/20/sharks-place-kaspar-their-2004-first-round-pick-on-waivers/comment-page-1/#comment-14880
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:42:00 +0000http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/?p=509#comment-14880Well, I hope Nabby can play a bit better out East this week. He’s had a rough 2 games and his sv. pct. has plummeted to .893.
That’s what happens when you let in 4 goals each on 20 and 21 shots in back to back games. GAA 2.39.
]]>By: dkhttp://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/2008/10/20/sharks-place-kaspar-their-2004-first-round-pick-on-waivers/comment-page-1/#comment-14879
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:11:15 +0000http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/?p=509#comment-14879Will F, #13

Unconscionable and bad do not mean the same thing. There is a place for both words and mepex used the correct one.

The next time somebody uses the word unconscionable around you, you will know what they are talking about. You should thank him/her for expanding your knowledge.