Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, info-tech, privacy and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. The team is Neil J. Wilkof, Annsley Merelle Ward, Nicola Searle, Eleonora Rosati, and Merpel, with contributions from Mark Schweizer. Read, post comments and participate! E-mail the Kats here

The team is joined by Guest Kats Rosie Burbidge, Stephen Jones, Mathilde Pavis, and Eibhlin Vardy, and by InternKats Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo, Hayleigh Bosher, Tian Lu and Cecilia Sbrolli.

Monday, 19 June 2006

The Financial Times has just informed the IPKat that the United States and the European Union will pledge tomorrow to take joint action to stem the world’s swelling tide of fake goods. Following a tenfold rise in trade in counterfeits in the past six years, the EU and the US propose to share intelligence and to coordinate policy at international bodies such as the World Intellectual Property Organisation, aiming first at Russia and China, then at Latin America and the Middle East.

EU authorities are reported to have seized more than 103 million items of counterfeit goods in 2004, up from just 10 million in 1998. A European official adds:

“The lion’s share were heading for the least developed countries in the world. This is not just a rich-country problem. And what we seize is just the tip of the iceberg”.

The IPKat notes that it's the old NATO partners ganging up against the Eastern threat again. Wouldn't it be nice, though, if we were all on the same side? After all, fake medicines and brake-pads will harm the Chinese and the Russians as much as they harm us - and which governments, East or West, benefit from trading that doesn't show up in the official books, if it can't be taxed or controlled? Merpel wonders if the big dealers in counterfeits in the East are the equivalent of War Lords, with their feifdoms and the money to buy the loyal support of their followers.

Trouble ahead - not necessarily!

There May be Trouble Ahead is the alarming title of a cute little book by Lex van Wijk, subtitled "a practical guide to effective patent asset management". The author (right), a patent attorney who has worked at Royal Dutch Shell, at Burmah Castrol as group patent manager,and at Siemens AG, now works at Vereenigde, where he advises clients on intellectual property matters.

What the publisher says:

"Patent assets are currently important strategic business tools. Their presence or absence can make or break technology-based companies. Patent asset management has therefore become a core responsibility within companies. This book discusses in a lucid manner the elements that need to be covered to ensure that patent assets are used to their full potential. It provides simple and practical management tools to realize alignment of patent, business, and research & development strategies. Additionally, this book will help managers understand why any decision regarding patent assets needs to be an informed business decision, and how these assets can contribute to the company's future success, if not survival".

What the IPKat says:

"As the author says in his Preface, these are awkward times for in-house patent professionals. They are even harder now, with the outbreak of "trollism" in the United States raising questions that CEOs aim at blameless patent staff along the lines of either 'what can we do about these patent trolls?' or 'why can't we be trolls too?'. This book won't make things easier for the patent pro, but it will give him a better idea of which problems he can deal with and which he should duck or pass on to someone else. The main problem facing in-house patent pros is that they are often expected to be omniscient polymaths, coping with economic, legal and strategic issues while exercising management skills. A second problem is that much of the information that any in-house patent pro needs in order to dispense good advice is simply not available to him - or not easily accessible - at the time he most needs it. This book will direct him to the information he most keenly needs when steering his company's patent assets clear of the many obstacles (self-induced and otherwise) that must be negotiated on the path from expenditure to profit".

IPKat Policies

This page summarises the IPKat policies on guest submissions and comments. If you have posted a comment to one of our blogposts and it hasn't appeared, it may be because it doesn't match our criteria for moderation. To learn more about our guest submissions, comments and complaints policy and the procedure for lodging a complaint click here.

Has the Kat got your tongue?

Just click the magic box below and get this page translated into a bewildering selection of languages!