Most of the coverage has focused on the environmental and economic effects of the pilot program, with some coverage of the safety issues such as requirements that truckers complete criminal background and drug and alcohol tests and that trucks must pass vehicle safety and emissions inspections.

There is also a pre-existing requirement that truckers in the US speak English:

This Houston Chronicle article is not what you usually read here but you don’t see stories like this every day:

“Along the waterfront tiny Brian Edward Mawhorr is known as ‘the big shrimp,’ and there’s little wonder why. He was born on the shrimp boat Raindear almost 30 miles offshore in the Gulf of Mexico early Wednesday.

‘He’s our little miracle baby,’ his mother, Cindy Preisel, said as she showed off the piece of green shrimp net twine that boat captain Edward Kiesel used to tie off Brian’s umbilical cord after he delivered the breech baby.”

Obstetricians have problems delivering breech babies and this shrimp boat captain did it without instructions. I have profound respect for these shrimpers’ obstetrical abilities and ingenuity:

“The baby’s first bottle was an emptied and boiled soy sauce bottle with a nipple made from the finger of a rubber shrimper’s glove. He was swaddled in paper and cloth towels.”

I wonder if the birth certificate will list his “Place of Birth” as “Raindear, USA.”

This Fox News article concerns important Constitutional issues, including free speech in educational settings and the church/state divide:

“A student who said she was told she wouldn’t get her diploma unless she apologized for a commencement speech in which she mentioned Jesus has filed a lawsuit alleging her free speech rights were violated. The school district contends its actions were “constitutionally appropriate.”

Erica Corder was one of 15 valedictorians at Lewis-Palmer High School in 2006. All were invited to speak for 30 seconds at the graduation ceremony. When it was Corder’s turn, she encouraged the audience to get to know Jesus Christ. Corder had not included those remarks during rehearsals.”

I suspect the last sentence above will end up having an impact on the outcome because the school has an interest in maintaining order. By spontaneously altering her remarks without notice to the school, this student presumably violated rules requiring pre-approval of valedictorian speeches. But I’m no Constitutional law scholar, so what do I know?

However, I know this: There’s no valid reason to have 15 valedictorians at one high school. This is just another example of how we’re dumbing down our schools amid feel-good educational policies that promote feelings over competition and achievement.

SEARCH AMAZON USING THIS SEARCH BOX:
Purchases made through this search function benefit this site, at no extra cost to you.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.