Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> At 06:05 PM 10/19/2005, you wrote:
>
>> 2005/10/20, Alex Karasulu
>> <aok123@bellsouth.net>:
>>
>>> Hmmm I guess this is because of the Spring's dep on Log4J right? Then
>>> let's use Log4J with SLF4J across the board just to be consistent.
>>> WDYT?
>>
>>
>> Spring uses Commons-Logging AFAIK. Later we will have to completely
>> remove Spring dependency and provide ApacheDS-centric configuration
>> schema. When we get rid of Spring, we can simply use nlog4j.
>
>
> Are you aware of jcl104-over-slf4j.jar ?
>
Oh I was not aware. Good to know glad you posted this.
> http://slf4j.org/manual.html#gradual
>
> In other words, you can still use library X, e.g. Spring, which
> depends on JCL. However, if you replace commons-logging.jar with
> jcl104-over-slf4j.jar, then the selection of the underlying logging
> system will be done by SLF4J without the class loader headaches. The
> underlying logging system can be any of NOP, simple, jdk14 logging,
> log4j or NLOG4J. Spring's commons-logging dependency becomes a moot
> issue.
>
That's great.
> I hope this is relevant to the discussion. Is it, by the way?
>
Yes I think so. Glad you chimed in with this additional info.
Thanks,
Alex