Wireless devices and household appliances may impact fetal development, changing endocrine and metabolic systems, according to a large study by Kaiser Permanente.

High electromagnetic field levelsof household appliances (such as washing machines and hair dryers) and wireless devices (such as laptops and routers) may be at least partially to blame for the rise in childhood obesity in recent years, according to a 13-year study by Kaiser Permanente that followed hundreds of pregnant women and 733 of their children.

After controlling for several factors, including child gender, pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal age at delivery, race, education, breastfeeding, and smoking, researchers write in Nature’s Scientific Reports that children exposed to high in-utero levels are nearly twice as likely to be overweight or obese as children exposed to low in-utero levels.

Specifically, high levels were considered to be more than 2.5 milligauss (mG), which is a unit of magnetic field strength, while low levels were considered to be less than 1.5 mG, and medium was everything in between. (The Environmental Protection Agency has compiled a list of magnetic field measurements in everyday electrical devices.)

“”Pregnancy is a critical developmental stage that is among the most vulnerable periods to environmental exposures,”” De-Kun Li, a perinatal epidemiologist and the lead author of the study, said in a news release. “”EMF exposure during pregnancy could impact the fetal development, including endocrine and metabolic systems, predisposing offspring to higher risk of obesity…This finding could have implications for possibly reducing childhood obesity and better understanding the obesity epidemic.””

When breaking the study down into the 18 factors considered, the findings are a bit befuddling. Out of all areas studied, including maternal, prenatal, and childhood factors, researchers found that only family income and childhood habits of eating fruits and vegetables varied among the low, medium, and high maternal exposure groups.

It turns out that children who ate more fruits and veggies tended to have a mother with higher magnetic field exposure during pregnancy. Researchers said they could not explain this association. And oddly, the pattern of exposure according to family income was inconsistent: Women with low or high family income had lower exposure than women with medium family income.

The study comes on the heels of Dr. Li’s previous work showing that electromagnetic fields could play a role in pregnancy outcomes and childhood diseases such as asthma. Still, he stresses that the results need to be replicated by additional studies.

Milind Deora, Lok Sabha MP, has recently brought into the public domain a major health issue relating to electromagnetic radiation from cell phones and base stations mounted on telecom towers. The trigger for his taking this important public health issue with the department of telecom (DoT) was the accidental death of a young boy, which, according him, was due to ‘electronic discharge coming in contact with high-tension overhead wire and (that) electrocuted him’. While this may be a freak incident, Deora has rightly focused on the related issue of cell phone radiation, a serious health hazard in the long term.

The non-ionising radiations from microwaves emitted by telecom base stations and cell phones have been considered safe due to their extremely low power density that does not cause any thermal effect on human cells as long as the exposures are within the limits prescribed by the Inter- national Commission for Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (Icnirp) in its guidelines. Based on studies conducted in the 1990s, Icnrip fixed limits on radiation from cellular base stations that are 4.5 W/m2 for GSM 900, 9.0 W/m2 for GSM 1800 and 10 W/m2 for UMTS (3G) in 1998. Several measurements made of radiation at the base of telecom towers and other locations have found radiation levels much lower than these limits. Therefore, WHO has declared mobile phones and base stations safe for public health.

However, it should be noted that the Icnirp guidelines are based on short-term, immediate health effects such as stimulation of peripheral nerves and muscles and harm caused by tissue temperatures, resulting from absorption of energy during exposure to electromagnetic fields expressed in terms of specific absorption rate (SAR). These are not based on long-term exposure to radiation from cellphone and base stations, particularly from broadband wireless systems such as WiMAX and 3.5G mobile systems.

Subsequent to the publication of the Icnirp guidelines more than a decade back, a number of studies have brought out the dangers of long-term exposure of RF radiation to public health. Notable among these are the Freiburger Appeal published in October 2002 by the interdisciplinary society for environmental medicine of Germany. The Salzburg Resolution of 2000 recommends outdoor exposure limits that are much lower than the Icnirp guidelines, particularly in publicly accessible areas. Similarly, the Catania Resolution recommends preventive strategies based on the ‘precautionary principle’. The Paris Charter, signed in March 2003 by three mobile phone operators and the City of Paris, limits public exposure to radiation at levels much lower than the Icnirp limits.
The inadequacies of the existing guidelines have been brought out in the BioInitiative Report 2009 in which a number of adverse biological effects of electromagnetic radiation at very low levels from hundreds of peer-reviewed studies have been highlighted.

It is learnt that in India, the Telecom Commission has decided to adopt Icnirp guidelines. In view of the doubts raised about these guidelines in so many countries, including the European Union, it will be prudent to carefully examine all existing international standards and review the decision already taken. The country will have one billion mobile phones by 2012. To connect so many cell phones, about one million base stations may be required. This will create an enormous electromagnetic smog, particularly in urban areas. The effect of such exposure from multiple base stations has not yet been studied in depth. The latency of a serious disease like cancer is ten to 20 years. Therefore, a precautionary approach is justified.

Some regulatory measures can somewhat mitigate the problem. One is to prescribe the maximum emitted power for various systems in the licence and to measure the same for compliance during acceptance testing. Another could be mandating indoor coverage for all commercial and office buildings, particularly for third generation systems. It is estimated that 80% of the 3G multimedia (data/video) traffic will originate or terminate indoor in crowded urban centers. To provide in-building coverage, outdoor base stations have to increase their power level, ie, radiation contributing to the electromagnetic smog.

In case dedicated indoors cells are provided, their radiation level will come down considerably. Studies have indicated up to 400% increase in system capacity by deployment of indoor pico/ microcells and outdoor macrocells, which will make the environment safer, due to reduction in electromagnetic radiation levels. Last but not the least is to give financial incentive to operators who deploy lower power density systems which are environment-friendly.

Since the 3G systems have a much higher level of radiated power, a numberof countries, notably China, have prescribed stricter norms to limit electromagnetic radiation from these systems. These norms are more stringent than what is applicable in Europe/ North America.

Since 3G and broadband wireless access systems like WiMAX are to be inducted in India in the near future, urgent action is required to study the effects of radiation from these systems by an independent group of experts with a view to fixing limits in the Indian context. While various municipal corporations like MCD have recently formulated policies to regulate erection of towers in cities like Delhi, mainly from aesthetic & structural angle, there is no authority at present to regulate radiation from these towers. This must be done by Trai in the interest of public health.

(Brevard, NC) – For years, the issue of cell phone safety has been a hot topic of debate, but we now know, thanks to years of stringent laboratory research, that cell phones do emit levels of radiation that can negatively affect one’s health.

Aulterra, the leading cell phone radiation neutralizer manufacturer, is introducing the new Aulterra Neutralizer™ into U.S. markets. The Neutralizer is a small holographic disc which has been scientifically proven to be significantly effective in reducing and neutralizing the harmful effects of electromagnetic waves.

Electromagnetic fields are all around us. In their natural form they are harmless. When electromagnetic fields are man-made, they have been shown to disrupt the DNA structure of our bodies, as scientific studies have demonstrated.

“Growing evidence suggests that electromagnetic fields (EMF) can break or nick DNA strands. This phenomenon is known to be associated with cancer,” said Glen Rein, PhD, of the Quantum Biology Laboratories and Stanford University professor whose research demonstrated that with the Aulterra Neutralizer there is a reduction in the in-Vitro Electromagnetic Field Effect of Cell Phones on Human DNA.

“The most significant finding from the research showed that with the Aulterra Neutralizer, the effect of the cell phone radiation on DNA rewinding is 95% reversed when an Aulterra Neutralizer was attached to the cell phone. Without the Aulterra Neutralizer the electromagnetic fields from the cell phone produced a 40% increase (relative to control values) in the DNA rewinding rate. This effect of the cell phone radiation is highly statistically significant compared to the untreated control.”

The Neutralizer contains a proprietary blend of natural materials which neutralize harmful emissions. The powerful effect of this blend of natural materials was first discovered when it was used to neutralize and remove lead and zinc from a landfill during an environmental cleanup project.

Other cell phone radiation protectors act as blockers or absorbers. The Aulterra Neutralizer is a better solution. It neither blocks radiation nor absorbs it. Any device that blocks 100% of the EMFs from a cell phone would make it useless. Absorbers become saturated and fail to function. The Neutralizer works by neither blocking nor absorbing cell phone radiation. Instead, the Neutralizer changes the manmade frequencies into coherent, harmless frequencies—the way nature intended.

The Aulterra Neutralizer is made from a patented blend of paramagnetic elements including cerium and lanthanum and a rare inorganic compound derived from a crystalline mineral found in only two known sites in the world. These three micro-thin layers of activated rare-earth elements produce the thinnest, most effective neutralizer ever. Simply place the small holographic disc on your phone to combat harmful radiation.

Peel the back from the Neutralizer and place it directly on the back of your cell phone or inside the battery cover. The Neutralizer protects you from radiation from your cell phone and radiation from cell phone towers. The effective range is a 36” diameter sphere from the Neutralizer. And the Aulterra Neutralizer does not negatively affect cellular phone reception or transmission.

For added protection, the Aulterra Neutralizer can be used on the following electronic devices: Wi-Fi routers, tablets, laptops, desktops, microwaves, cordless telephones, baby monitors, televisions, video game equipment, breaker boxes/fuse boxes and more.

The Neutralizer is science that works! Reproducible tests prove that the Aulterra Neutralizer retunes the EMF frequencies of cell phones and other electronic devices into coherent energy. Once the frequencies are converted, they no longer harm to your DNA.

The secret of the Neutralizer lies in the crystalline matrix mixed into the ink of the Neutralizer patch. Neutralizer’s developer, Kim Dandurand identified the crystalline properties while engaged in a major environmental cleanup operation in 1996. He used the blend of material to neutralize chemical and radioactive waste from landfills.

Dandurand then investigated whether the paramagnetic substance could be used to neutralize the EMFs from cell phones and electronic equipment. Kim Dandurand funded a research program at the Quantum Biology Research Laboratories. Experiments showed that human DNA reacted adversely to EMFs emanating from cell phones. Tests on human DNA proved that with an Aulterra Neutralizer attached to a cell phone the natural coherent fields from the Neutralizer had successfully harmonized the incoherent EMFs rendering them harmless to living tissue.

Consider these cell phone radiation facts:

In a study by the University of Washington, Dr. Henry Lai discovered that brain cells are clearly damaged by microwave levels far below the U.S. government’s recommended safe zone and that even small doses of radio frequencies can accumulate over time to cause harmful effects.

In a research study conducted by Italian scientists it was discovered that radiation emitted by cell phones is especially conducive to the growth of cancerous cells.
In a study funded by the telecom industry to prove the safety of cell phones, it was revealed that cellular damage and tumor growth can be induced in a laboratory setting using radiation levels one-third of those listed the FCC’s exposure guidelines.

At the University of Utah, a researcher discovered that the younger the child, the greater the amount of radiation is absorbed by the brain.
Because of the intense electromagnetic field produced by most automobiles, Volkswagen of Europe has issued warnings stating that using a cell phone while in a car can be even more dangerous to the health of the individual.

Since 1975, the number of cases of brain cancer in the United States has increased by 25%.
Studies indicate that using a hands-free headset and earpiece is actually a greater health risk than holding the phone directly against the ear.

The jury is still out about whether electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and wireless home phones pose health risks. For those concerned about the potential dangers of using mobile devices, here are safety tips provided by the Environmental Health Trust, a nonprofit that researches hazards of using mobile phones, and Pong, a company that makes smartphone cases that redirect radiation away from the heads of users.

1. When on a call, use a wired headset or speakerphone mode. Use a Bluetooth headset, which emits a smaller amount of radiation, only when talking. When not using the headset, keep it off your body.

2. Place the mobile phone away from your body when on a call.

3. Do not carry mobile phones in pockets of pants or in shirts or bras. Use a belt holster designed to shield the body from radiation.

4. Avoid using a mobile phone in a moving car, train, bus, or in rural areas at some distance from a cell tower. Distance from a cell tower will increase the cellphone’s radiation output.

5. Turn the mobile phone off when you don’t need to use it.

6. Use a corded landline phone instead of a wireless phone, which also emits radiation.

7. Avoid using mobile phone inside of buildings, particularly those with steel structures, which increases the device’s radiation output because signals are not as strong.

8. Do not allow children, whose bodies are more vulnerable to absorbing radiation, to sleep with a cellphone beneath their pillow or keep it at the bedside.
9. Do not allow children under 18 to use a mobile phone except in emergencies.

10. When making a call, do not hold the phone to your ear until after the person on the other line answers. The device emits more radiation before a call goes through.

Mobile, Portable, Cordless and Cell phones, and Wireless (WiFi) Internet Technology give off the most aggressive form of electromagnetic radiation known to man, because interferes with subtle invisible brain waves and is damaging to the DNA in our body cells.

We are constantly discovering new noxious low-frequency EMF, such as Digital Television, for example, and now we have found out about a new noxious Digital Radiation coming right off the screen of the new iPhones. Upon doing further research, we have now come up with new ways to combat these new noxious energies.

WiFi / Mobile Phone Radiation Shields are designed to eliminate noxious radiation emissions. These WiFi / Mobile Phone Radiation Shields creates a healthy life-force energy field which scatters the microwave emission and at the same time reducing the ‘hot head’ syndrome which usually accompanies mobile/ cell phone users.

Did you know that WiFi technology is just as damaging as Cell Phone Radiation? You can now place a WiFi Radiation Protection Shield directly computer to protect you in wireless internet cafes, or place on your wireless internet modem or card, to protect you from these noxious WiFi beams.

Did you know that any portable phone handset, cordless phone at home or in your office emits noxious electromagnetic radiation and microwave fields? Simply place a Mobile Phone Radiation Shield inside your phone under the battery or place and adhesive Mobile Phone Protection Shield on the back of the device near the aerial, and your portable phone will no longer cause you damage every time you use it. These protection shields are suitable for all mobile phones, portable phones, cordless phones and cell phones.

Mobile Phone Protection Shields also act as a Personal Space Clearer, giving you ten metres of protection everywhere you go, when you take your Mobile Phone, Notebook computer or any other device that has one of our Radiation Protection shields in it.

WiFi / Laptop / Mobile Phone Radiation Shields will protect you, your friends and your loved ones from causing any further harm while using this technology. Not only do these shields put the oxygen back into the air that this technology removes while using these devices but they also work as a person Space Protector, giving you a radiation protection field of around ten metres wherever you go. An absolute must for every type of cell phone, mobile phone or portable desk / home phone, any wireless internet connection or modem and every desktop and laptop computer.

WiFi / Mobile Phone Protection Shields prevents that burning hothead and nauseous feeling while engaged on the phone or even when the phone is in your pocket. These shields give you 100% protection and also prevent further DNA damage from the direct signals to your phone, internet modem or laptop. This can be easily verified through muscle testing (kinesiology), biofeedback machines or pulse testing. Our non-adhesive slides in under your battery. The advantage of this is that you can transfer it over to your new phone every time you update it. Or we have an Adhesive version that can be placed on the back of your phone, wireless internet modem or computer.

We know that you will be more than impressed with the level of improvement in your health and well-being, using our Orgone Energy & Schumann Resonance products, made using our unique Orgonium technology.

The jury is still out about whether electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and wireless home phones pose health risks. For those concerned about the potential dangers of using mobile devices, here are safety tips provided by the Environmental Health Trust, a nonprofit that researches hazards of using mobile phones, and Pong, a company that makes smartphone cases that redirect radiation away from the heads of users.

1. When on a call, use a wired headset or speakerphone mode. Use a Bluetooth headset, which emits a smaller amount of radiation, only when talking. When not using the headset, keep it off your body.

2. Place the mobile phone away from your body when on a call.

3. Do not carry mobile phones in pockets of pants or in shirts or bras. Use a belt holster designed to shield the body from radiation.

4. Avoid using a mobile phone in a moving car, train, bus, or in rural areas at some distance from a cell tower. Distance from a cell tower will increase the cellphone’s radiation output.

5. Turn the mobile phone off when you don’t need to use it.

6. Use a corded landline phone instead of a wireless phone, which also emits radiation.

7. Avoid using mobile phone inside of buildings, particularly those with steel structures, which increases the device’s radiation output because signals are not as strong.

8. Do not allow children, whose bodies are more vulnerable to absorbing radiation, to sleep with a cellphone beneath their pillow or keep it at the bedside.
9. Do not allow children under 18 to use a mobile phone except in emergencies.

10. When making a call, do not hold the phone to your ear until after the person on the other line answers. The device emits more radiation before a call goes through.

Concerned over the health hazards, National Green Tribunal restrains telecom firms from settting up towers

Concerned over the health hazards likely to be caused by cell phone towers, the National Green Tribunal has restrained several telecom firms from setting them up without following mandatory provisions of law and taking permission from the competent authority.

“”Considering gravity of allegations levelled and health hazard likely to be caused, we direct that no construction of cell phone communication towers shall be made without following mandatory provisions of law and necessary permission from competent authority,”” a NGT bench of Acting Chairperson Justice A S Naidu and expert member P C Mishra has said.

Issuing notice to the Ministry of Communications and IT, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Ministry of Health, Securities and Exchange Board of India and telecom firms — Bharti Infratel Ltd, Airtel, Idea, Vodaphone, Tata, Reliance and Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd, the NGT has sought their response by the next date of hearing on December 20.
The tribunal’s order came on the plea of Delhi resident Arvind Gupta, who has sought directions to the Centre and the telecom firms for implementing guidelines and regulations issued by MoEF regarding installation of cell phone towers nationwide.

In his application, filed through advocate B P Tripathy, Gupta has alleged that MoEF guidelines have not been followed and implemented by Department of Telecommunications while allowing installation of towers throughout the country.

He has also alleged that “”norms are flouted brazenly by all companies involved with installation of mobile towers , having complete disregard and concern for environmental protection“”.

Gupta has alleged that radiations emitted by towers not only adversely affect flora and fauna, but can also cause cancer in human beings.

He has further alleged that the Centre and telecom firms have not devised rules and guidelines for implementing existing regulations pertaining to installation of telecom towers so that environmental exposure to electromagnetic radiation (EMR) emitted by them will be minimised.

In his application, he has sought constituting of a high powered committee of experts to lay guidelines for limiting cell phone tower radiation before installing any new towers.

He has further sought directions to market regulator SEBI to restrain it from granting permission to any company to invite investments from general public for installing cell phone towers for private profits, saying it will lead to “”irreparable environmental damage and health hazards to human lives…””.

The applicant has also sought transfer of all the cases related to mobile tower radiation from the high courts to NGT.

Is EMF really harmful to your health? Are you safe from EMF? Do you even know what EMF is? Then this post is very important for you to read and understand. EMF as some are not fully aware of it is short for Electromagnetic fields. EMF is invisible electrical magnetic fields which are a weak type of radiation.

EMF is commonly found everywhere. The earth release natural EMF that is weak and extremely low. According to scientist this low EMF are safe and helps regulate important functions on the human body. However, there are other kinds of EMF which are artificial and can cause harm to the body. This is our focus and our main concern.

Artificial EMF is usually found everywhere. There are usually emitted by most electronic gadgets you have at home and offices such as computers, laptops, cellphones, WiFi modems, hair dryers and other gadgets that uses high voltage wires.
EMF can cause a lot of health problems such as brain tumors, leukemia, birth defects, miscarriages, chronic fatigue, headaches, cataracts, heart problems, stress, nausea, chest pain, forgetfulness, cancer and other health problems. But according to some studies, cannot cause such health problems. However, more and more experts are stating with shown evidence that are real health concerning issues.

Now, do you think EMF is health concerning? Have you experienced extreme migraine when you use your computer all day long? Then, there are some problems with EMF.

And because our homes and offices are filled with gadgets and appliances that emits EMF everyday then the chances you get more serious problem is pretty high. So how can you protect yourself from EMF? EMF detectors are what you need.

There is EMF detector that specializes on EMF measuring on the environment to prevent any serious harmful effect or help you find a way to lessen your exposure. EMF measures the level of on the environment and alerts you if the surrounding area is high of.

A perfect example of an EMF device is the Electromagnetic Field EMF Detector Impulse. It is designed specially to detect measure and alert you of low and high radiation. Just point it in the place you want to measure it will the job. It usually makes the ticking sound when measuring. But you can also set it to tick when you are in a high EMF environment.

So what now? It only detects but does not control the EMF. Detection is a good sign. It means you are now aware of the EMF around you. You can now try unplugging some devices at your home and stay away from places with high.

Children and pregnant women should avoid using cell phones, cordless phones and other wireless devices.

This is according to a panel of influential scientists, which believes that much stricter safety measures are needed to protect people from being harmed by electromagnetic radiation from devices including cellphones, cellphone towers, powerlines and wireless internet.

The scientists met to consider all the evidence linking wireless devices to cancer, neurological diseases and infertility, and concluded that there was evidence of “serious disruptions to biological systems”.

The panel’s findings and recommendations have recently been published in the scientific journal, “Reviews on Environmental Health”.

But Vodacom spokesperson Richard Boorman says there is no cause for alarm:

“There have been thousands of scientific studies into the effects of radio frequency on health. There is no evidence to convince experts that exposure below the guidelines set by International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) carries any health risks, for adults or children.”

But according to the Swedish Karolinska Institute, which took part in the panel: “Many researchers now believe the existing safety limits are inadequate to protect public health because they do not consider prolonged exposure to lower emission levels that are now widespread”.

Panellist Professor Elihu Richter from the Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine in Israel said there was already “an increase in cancer and neuro-behavioural impairments, even though these wireless technologies are fairly new. This finding suggests that the exposures are already too high to protect people from health harm”.

Professor Yuri Grigoriev, Chair of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, said simply: “”Pregnant women and children of all ages should avoid using cell and cordless phones given the health effects we are seeing already.””

The panel recommends that government should greatly reduce the exposure limits for electromagnetic radiation. It also called for the establishment of an international registry to track the incidence and mortality rates for cancers and neurological and immune diseases over time.

It also proposes that the producers of new wireless technologies needed to prove that these are safe and that there should be compulsory testing of electromagnetic emissions levels before these were introduced.

Boorman agreed that there were “still some gaps in scientific knowledge, and more research is being carried out to fill these” and that the World Health Organisation set the priorities for global research

“However,” added Boorman, “people who personally want to can take simple steps to reduce their exposure as a precaution by keeping the mobile device away from the head and body during use, by using an earpiece, using the loudspeaker function, placing the device on a surface when sending data files and texting instead of calling”.

Dr. David O. Carpenter, M.D Worries About the Biological Effects of Wireless Technology in Schools

Dr. David O. Carpenter, M.D is a subject matter expert and contributing author to Safe Schools 2012 on the subject of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs). He shares his understanding about the health impacts of WiFi (a Radio Frequency (RF) exposure) as well as Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) emissions on children through this and many other publications. In December 2011, Dr. Carpenter authored a declaration, richly filled with information on the biological effects of wireless technologies and his concerns about the safety of wireless devices in schools. He recommends wired solutions, as opposed to WiFi, as a way to safeguard children and maximized learning.

Dr. Carpenter’s Background
Dr. Carpenter authored an Amended Declaration, dated December 20, 2011 as a court filing about Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) documenting his view on the impact WiFi will have on children attending school.

In Amended Declaration declaration, we find that Dr. Carpenter is a public health physician, educated at Harvard Medical School and currently, Director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany and Professor of Environmental Health Sciences within the School of Public Health. Previously, he was the Dean of the School of Public Health at the University of Albany and the Director of the Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research of the New York State Department of Health. Throughout his career, Dr, Carpenter concentrated his studies on electrophysiology, Electromagnetic Field bioeffects from Radio Frequency (RF) and Microwave (MW) radiation.

Some Views and Findings From Dr. Carpenter

Dr. Carpenter says, “In the context of school development, WI-FI exposes building occupants including children and adults constantly from both computers and infrastructure antennas. Duration may be an even more potent contributing factor to RF/MW radiation bioeffects than exposure levels. Chronic, such as all-day, school exposure, is more likely than short and intermittent exposure, such as cell phone use, to produce harmful health effects, and is likely to do so at lower exposure levels.”

He says solid scientific evidence is clear about the links between Radio Frequency (RF)/Microwave (MW) exposure levels and possible changes in cell membrane function, cell communication, metabolism, activation of proto-oncogenes, and the triggering of the production of stress proteins. He observes that these health risks come from exposures below FCC guidelines and the same or less than those levels from school WiFi. He says, it has been shown that these radiations can cause cell deaths, DNA breaks, chromosome aberrations, cell stress, killed brain neurons, and even premature cell aging.

He observes, public health science generally accepts the fact that some human groups are more vulnerable than others. Those more vulnerable include children, pregnant women, the elderly, and those with preexisting illnesses and/or impairments. Children especially are vulnerable to exposed, because of the susceptibility of their developing nervous systems. Radio Frequency (RF)/Microwave (MW) radiation, he points out, more easily penetrates children’s heads. Children absorb more of the Radio Frequency (RF)/Microwave (MW) energy in their tissues than adults at WiFi frequencies. Children’s skulls are thinner, their brains are smaller, and their brain tissue is more conductive.

Dr. Carpenter notes that the FCC public Radio Frequency (RF)/Microwave (MW) radiation exposure guidelines are based on the height, weight, and stature of a 6-foot tall man, not children with unique susceptibility. At early ages, children have a high rate of cellular activity and are at more at risk for DNA damage and subsequent cancers. He also notes, “Growth and development of the central nervous system is still occurring well into the teenage years, such that the neurological impairments predictable by the extent science may have great impact upon development, cognition, learning, and behavior.”
Studies have shown that when fetuses are exposed to Radio Frequency (RF)/Microwave (MW) radiation there is an increased risk factor for childhood leukemia and a higher incidence of miscarriages.

Dr. Carpenter understands from years of study and solid scientific evidence that Radio Frequency (RF)/Microwave (MW) radiation and Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) fields present health dangers. He also believes that there is active suppression of literature on these dangers. He goes on to say that the large body of scientific literature makes it clear that radiation exposure of chronic duration is quite harmful to humans, particularly children, as well as to animals and plants.

Declaration Summaries
Dr. David O. Carpenter, M.D believes Radio Frequency (RF)/Microwave (MW) radiation is a serious concern and a risk to human health. He observes that exposures like those from FM, TV and cell phones have been demonstrated to be harmful even though they are low intensity and only sometimes a long duration. Introduce varying age groups and those with preexisting sicknesses, there is higher risks, particularly for children. To make a bad exposure worse, increasing the constancy and length of exposure toward the maximum, up to a 24/7 durations such as from WiFi, will put human health at an even greater health risk.

Computer radiation microenvironments, where there are many sources of Radio Frequency (RF)/Microwave (MW), as is the case with WiFi-equipped schools, are more harmful than a single, isolated Radio Frequency (RF)/Microwave (MW) radiation exposure at the same power density and duration. Children are known to be more susceptible to these radiations than adults and now these radiations are in a school-confined radiation-filled environment. He believes internet access should be through wired access, not WiFi.