Share this Article

Author:

Let alone that their helter-skelter lifestyles are responsible for AIDS, chlamydia and sex gangs that are abducting our children, but what is normal about a gay fantasizing about a beluga whale’s gaping blow hole?

What do you think these anal pioneers of the queer frontier think about all day in their little secretary or nursing jobs? How to stop world hunger or efficiently rule Egypt? No! This little snowblowing drug fiends are making whoopy with monkies and dog paddling the mighty tigers of nature. It is all sick and disgusting. It is not normal.

Gays want us to believe that their marriage to one another is very normal. They want America to accept the idea that they can be trusted to adopt children and change their diapers, without an illegal petting during the wipe down section. If gays had it their way, every child would need their underoos changed until they reached their 20s!

A man who fishes for fecal matter in the backdoor pond of another man cannot be trusted. It is just like finding a boy with two names: Ron Paul. Jessie Jackon. Oh look, Jessie Jackson has founded a group called the “Rainbow Coalition.” Well just colored me surprised!

I am sick and tired of these bigoted gays, trying to insert their daggers into our lives and make us bleed morality, while they lap it up and lure our kids with the false scent of freedom.

Gays are pied pipers. They will flute and skip all around, making kids think they are happiness sunshine and milkdrop easter bunnies of Easter cuteness. When instead, they are all snarling dragons, hoping to roast the rump of our kids with their seared breath, and then, greedily chew them up while they are still “hot”.

Never forget parents. Gays will lick anything and thrust their lifemaker in whatever has a hole. They are just as nastier than hornery Satan, sitting in hell by himself and fangling his foo fighter in the throes of ecstasy at the pornograph of Modern America.

When will you learn, parents, that Satan’s favorite butter cookie is having your child knocked out with sleeping gas and lathered with the sauces of spent homosexuality. He is arming these gays with crafty ideas to get their agenda into law. They are bull rogering animals and getting them relaxed with quaalades, then taking all these sick pictures . Next, will be our children.

And guess what. Obama will sign it all into law.

Somewhere out there, a cackling gay stool pigeon or even worse a mewing lesbian will caw and hiss in contempt, angrily kneading away at their keyboards and trying to claim they are normal. If they were normal, then why do they do things like this:

Children’s thoughts plied with homosexual satan nectar in cartoons. The once proud cadence of the marine now the foxtrot of ferret stuffing rectal plumbers. Gays have their augers of steel, ready to shove them every which way and it matters not the time, place or person or species! As long as it has a hole, the gay perversion will be filled.

This is an expose on what gays want for America, spoken in over 10,000 words with ten pictures. TV is corrupt and gays are the new blacks, passing themselves off as funny and a household name with their sitcom antics.

In the end, they are all scary and you will not want to run into one in a dark alley. The result will be waking up sore and confused, your money gone and body filled with the genetic hotsauce of tribal domination. Feral gays, fear them. None of them are right in the head and will never assimilate to the will of nature, for a man to marry a woman and then raise a child in a stable, normal household who bows prostrate before God.

This is a masterpiece. Simplistic enough for the everyman to understand, yet sophisticated in the melodic tone and tempo. “Pioneers of the queer frontier” struck me as a learned nod to the frilly shirts of the dandy highwayman Adam Ant and the burgeoning wild nobility of the 80′s.

You remind us the pike to perversion leads to no good ends with “your money gone and body filled with the genetic hotsauce of tribal domination.”

Thank you for taking the time to educate us to this threat to American life and sharpen our perception for signs of decline. A sublime piece of note and worthy of “best story with a picture of a albino fish.”

Gays want society to think it is normal to have bestial relations with animals. That way, when two gay men are walking down the street and patting each other’s behinds, it won’t seem so bad in comparison.

There’s nothing WRONG with love. There IS, however, something terribly, terribly wrong with thinking things like, “Love and marriage and having kids is something ONLY heterosexual couples can have” and “Gays are all into bestiality”.

We aren’t. Your pictures have nothing to do with homosexuality, other than that you want to make it look like that. You’re just jealous of us, if anything.

You seem to be lacking in intelligence. I have stated, quite clearly, that I live in Washington state [where the governor is Christine Gregoire, not Dino Rossi], and attend university here. I prefer the British method of spelling words, something which has nothing to do with my nationality. If I wanted to move anywhere, it would be to Scandinavia, preferably Finland. Nice attempt at trying to make me out to be anything else, though.

You do nothing to argue my points. Therefore, you must be conceding the argument.

I don’t like you. I think you’re racist, xenophobic, homophobic, bigoted, and a complete prick. You are exactly the sort of person I wouldn’t consider associating myself with in person. Your narrow views are offensive, and would offend any of the people I DO associate with.

Even in my rather conservative college town, where some homosexual couples are worried about being seen HOLDING HANDS, people are better than that, better than YOU are. Those are the people I would rather be friends with.

I don’t like you. Not in the LEAST. I’m glad that, by your logic, I’ll be going to “Hell”, since I’m agnostic, an open lesbian, and don’t see the point in marrying a man solely to spend the rest of my life birthing and raising children. That sickens me. At least in “Hell”, I’ll get to hang out with other homosexuals. They’re much nicer than you are.

I am friendly with many people, although I am a predominantly antisocial person. I get along best with those who respect my beliefs and preferences. You flip-flop between showing no regard for any of the things I believe are important and are right, calling them “wrong” and “unnatural”, and trying to be my “friend”.

Because it ISN’T a “perversion against nature”. If love is good, then why is it so “wrong” or “unnatural” for me to be attracted to women, to love other women?

I’m not “standing against nature”. I’m accepting myself for who I am. Your god makes/made all people, according to you, doesn’t he? By that argument, he made me a person who is attracted to women, and not men. By saying it’s a “perversion”, you’re essentially saying that your god screwed up.

Let me just say something. Let me say that all of you homos, you are not right. You try to rip my words apart and call me bigot, when you do not respect my right to say you cannot teach children that homosexual sexual relationships are not normal. You are trying to tell me I cannot say homosexuals violate nature.

If nature meant for people to be homosexual, would not gay couples be able to conceive their own children?

That’s not the point. The point is, you’re trying to teach people that homosexual people are not right, that we are sick, twisted, perverted individuals who all do drugs, are nymphomaniacs, and should die.

And THAT is not right. You’re entitled to your own opinion, but bear in mind that the First Amendment, which guarantees Freedom of Speech, does NOT guarantee you the freedom to spew hate and lies.

There we go. This is exactly what I am talking about. You are making all these attacks against my personal character when you are trying to avoid the issue.

Say what you want, but look at nature. How many two man couples have children? Answer me that. How many two man couples will have homosexual love and give birth to a child?

The reason they cannot is because their life violates nature. I do not want my children growing up in a world where it is ‘normal’ for this to happen. That is not the way life is supposed to be.

Gay marriage and gay adoption are dangerous. Americans do not want it and it should not happen. It is not natural and the Bible warns about it too. My gut tells me that if gay adoption and marriage is allowed nationwide, it will lead to the final fall of this country. I do not care what you gays do inside your home, but just don’t try to make your lifestyle and agenda and force it into mine and society.

Gay marriage is hardly “dangerous”. You don’t want to allow homosexuals the same rights that you have, to ask someone they love to marry them, to live with them for the rest of their lives, because they cannot procreate?

And how is allowing a homosexual couple to adopt children “dangerous”? You don’t want to allow children to have a stable home and loving family? That’s what’s sick and twisted.

What we do inside our homes is our private business, just as whatever you do in your home is yours. But we want to be able to raise children and marry, just as you can. That’s not forcing it into your life, but it’s a basic right that we should be allowed.

Your words are a personal attack against me, by your logic.

Also, you only speak about homosexual men. Is this because you don’t think women can be solely attracted to women, or because lesbian couples CAN give birth to children?

The nuclear family is the backbone of the country. A husband, a wife and children. When you look at national data, you will see something about “birth rate vs. morbidity”. Nations need children to continue and all spending, military and infrastructure is based on population values.

A stable home is made by the nuclear family. So when we have decreased childbirths because gays are increasing, it will hurt the national birthrate. The problem the youth generation is going to have supporting the baby boomers will pale in comparison. Add to that the moral and social implications of allowing gay marriage and what it does to national psyche, and you see the problem.

Then on top of all this, gay adoption is a dangerous thing. Sure, it may look okay for two women to raise a child but what of that child’s mind. What is the psychological aspect of it all? Is it right for a child to see two women kissing each other and having lesbian sexual relationship. Is it okay to deprive them of a true father, or true mother if vice versa.

Does our nation have the social infrastructure for kids raised in a gay home. If kids are allowed to be adopted by gays, then at elementary schools, all children will have to be indoctrinated.

They will have to be taught it is normal and acceptable for a person to have lesbian parents. Or homosexual gay dads. The problem here is that I teach my children and my grandchildren that homosexuality is wrong and against life. Because it is.

If we allow gay adoption, you’re telling me that my children will have to accept being taught it is okay for a man to insert himself in their bottom. It is okay for a man to make a pass at them, it is nature. You are telling me that my children will be taught that lesbianism is okay.

This is a part of the gay agenda. They want their lifestyle endorsed and institutionalized at the education level. They are using gay adoption as a means of converting all kids to think gay lifestyle is fine, despite the will of their parents. That is what is wrong and why we must not allow it to happen.

How many of these so-called “nuclear families” have internal problems, such as alcoholism, child abuse, spousal abuse, and the like? I include sexual abuse, such as incest and non-consensual sexual intercourse, with abuse, as they are forms of abuse. How can you assume that a heterosexual couple is “better” at raising children, simply based on their sexual orientation?

What does gay marriage do to the “psyche of a nation”? It allows everyone to get married, regardless of gender. Is that so dangerous? Allowing people to love freely?

News flash: Homosexuals do NOT think it’s okay to have sex in front of children. Most of us are disgusted by paedophilia, and wouldn’t dare touch a child inappropriately. There is a HUGE difference between paedophiles and homosexuals, and the two should NEVER be confused for the other.

Would you have heterosexual sex in front of YOUR children to teach them that it’s “normal”? I hope not. That is the equivalent of sexual abuse towards the child, and that is WRONG by many moral standards.

You would teach children that it is wrong to love people if they’re of the same gender. You would teach hatred and intolerance for people based upon who they love. You would deny a child the right to be adopted by a family and loved, to have a better life, based purely on the parents’ genders. That is sick and twisted.

What’s wrong with a child having two moms, or two dads? Homosexuals do not always raise homosexual children. If anything, we would raise children to accept people regardless of their sexual preferences. We don’t teach children that a person of ANY gender making a pass at them, or having sexual intercourse with them against the child’s will, is “right”, because that is wrong and twisted, by any definition. Sexual intercourse requires consent from BOTH parties, or it is the equivalent of rape and sexual abuse. No one would teach that to a child.

Homosexuals like myself aren’t “using gay adoption as a means of converting all kids to think [the] gay lifestyle is fine, despite the will of their parents”. We want to have and raise children and still be free to love our partners, regardless of gender. There’s nothing “wrong” with that.

It’s everywhere. The only ‘gay agenda’ is, just like the ‘black agenda’ during the civil rights movement, is to no longer be treated like second class citizens. It’s an outrage that such a modern country that used to espouse the beauty of the separation between church and state now allows so many religion bigots to corrupt the system and inject their own brand of hate into the country.

And guess what. If everyone was born gay, then how would there still be people? Gays cannot have babies, because they stand against nature.

If it is natural for people to be born gay, then how are there still 6 billion people on Earth?

Everyone is born from a MOTHER and a FATHER, a WOMAN and a MAN.

You cannot argue against science. It takes man and woman to make a baby, so by your born-gay theory you can see it is errant because we still have plenty of people to this day. Gay is a psychological disorder and the people who suffer from it are in denial, which is typical.

//And guess what. If everyone was born gay, then how would there still be people? Gays cannot have babies, because they stand against nature.//

Doesn’t God test peoples faith in him and his words every day? Isn’t putting something that many would consider to be ‘unnatural’ on Earth be a test? Are you not casting your hatred and disdain on your fellow man and failing the test of God?

//If it is natural for people to be born gay, then how are there still 6 billion people on Earth?//

Because not everyone is gay you retard, nor has everyone been gay simultaneously in the past.

//Everyone is born from a MOTHER and a FATHER, a WOMAN and a MAN.//

Congrats, you know how babies are made.

//You cannot argue against science.//

You do whenever you don’t like what science says, particularly when it comes to how long this planet’s been around for.

//It takes man and woman to make a baby, so by your born-gay theory you can see it is errant because we still have plenty of people to this day.//

How is it errant? It was stated that gay people are born gay, not people in general are born gay.

//Gay is a psychological disorder and the people who suffer from it are in denial, which is typical.//

Yet believing in a magical man who says that if you follow his words will take you to a place where everything’s all nice and sun-shiny, and that those words apparently take the form of murder, death, betrayal, and hatred in your head, is NOT a psychological disorder. If you’re gonna call homosexuality a ‘psychological disorder’, I’m gonna call Christianity that as well, considering how it’s physically impossible for the shit you claim to have happened, to happen, simply because it literally relies on events that could never occur.

congratulations adam you have just provided wallbanger argument of the year.
following the logic of that statement either all males on earth are unatural or all females are. because if you are born as something everyone are right?
nobody ever claimed EVERYONE is born gay. we claimed that the people who are gay are born gay. are you saying that everyone is gay?
you actually go on contradict yourself in the same sentance. first you say it’s a mental disorder. fine that’s saying it’s a problem that they have and can not deal with themself but have to learn to live with. that is agreeing with us that you are born homosexual(even if you are more crude about it than we are) then you go on to say they are in denial… without even pointing out what they are in denial about.
your argument doesn’t work because you forgot to bloody have one.
yes we need people to populate the world. no we do not need everyone to do so. the world is overpopulated as it is haveing less than 1 kid per adult for a few years will not make mankind die out and even then it’s still higher than 1 per adult at the moment.
once again i dare you use logic and prove that gays atraction to others of the same gender is not something they are born with.
you are right you can’t argue with sience… but since you provide no sience i say our reasoning still has the higher ground than your babeling

Let me just say something. Let me say that all of you christians, you are not right. You try to rip my words apart and call me bigot, when you do not respect my right to say you cannot teach children thatbeliveing in god is not normal. You are trying to tell me I cannot say christians violate nature.

If nature meant for people to be christian would they not be without indoctrination?

If you answer yes, you have an agenda to corrupt America. You have an agenda to force everyone to accept gay marriage, including our kids.

How do you think children can have gay parents, until every school is forced to teach all children that being gay is acceptable?

Before you yell and whine, the problem there is the fact that CHILDREN WILL BE FORCED TO ADDRESS THE TOPIC OF HOMOSEXUALITY.

“How many of these so-called “nuclear families” have internal problems, such as alcoholism, child abuse, spousal abuse, and the like? I include sexual abuse, such as incest and non-consensual sexual intercourse, with abuse, as they are forms of abuse. How can you assume that a heterosexual couple is “better” at raising children, simply based on their sexual orientation?”

No, none of this is acceptable. If children are in an unstable home, they should be taken out. What you’re missing is that with “non consensual sexual intercourse, abuse, alcoholism, child abuse, spousal abuse” is one other abuse: homosexual.

Teaching children about homosexuality and exposing them to it is abuse. The problem with homosexuality is that the issue mainly addresses sexuality. That is abuse. So yes, your lifestyle is in all the woes you mentioned and why I will rally with millions of others to keep your type from adopting children and thinking you can have an ordained marriage.

It is nothing against you, it is just that I don’t want societal institutions to be diseased and corrupted.

“It is nothing against you, it is just that I don’t want societal institutions to be diseased and corrupted.”

You’re attacking homosexuality, when I have openly stated that I am a lesbian and that I plan on having children, whether through adoption or artificial insemination. You are saying that homosexuality is wrong and perverted, that gay marriage and allowing homosexuals to adopt children, that my lifestyle, and those of other homosexuals, is sick, twisted, and perverted. That is attacking MY lifestyle and, by definition, MYSELF.

I have as much a right to have a family and a marriage as you do. I don’t want to force people to accept gay marriage, but, surprise, I don’t think there’s anything WRONG with it.

By telling people, including children, that homosexuality is wrong, you are encouraging bullying and suicides of teenagers, and are telling your children and grandchildren that, if they find themselves attracted to someone of the same gender, they are wrong and you do not love them. I wonder how you’ll feel when you drive one of them to commit suicide or to harm themselves as a result.

fair enough you wanna stand by that argument? then school should not be alowed to teach about jesus christ either. because it is not okay that schools teach that it is normal to belive in a holy zombie.
so yeah start fighting ALL the coruption and start wrieting about how christianity should be banned form school and you have a point. untill then you are a hypocrit and hypocrits are wrong by default.

They have banned Christianity from school and they did it in 1952, when they banned prayer in school and what’s even more bad in all this is that you can see the increase in birthrate and dropout rate in statistics. Homosexuality is just bad.

“Accepting a diverse range of religious and spiritual beliefs, and therefore not forcing everyone in schools to say Christian prayers, is bad and is why I say there are such things as teenage pregnancies, premarital sex, and high school drop-outs.
Accepting a diverse range of sexual orientations and gender expressions, therefore, is also bad and wrong, because it might teach children to not hate people for being different..”

No one person, religion or institution is forcing or coercing anyone to a theist belief system. This may be a signal of an internal struggle of heart and your selected life script that needs addressed with sage counsel and personal reflection.

For one, you just copy-pasted that response from another conversation on this site. Two, I was summarising what Abe has been saying, especially since he just compared banning Christianity and prayer from schools to his proposed banning of teaching anything about homosexuality.

Did I even SAY that any “one person, religion or institution is forcing or coercing anyone to a theist belief system”? No. Although, you are of the opinion that, if you aren’t a Christian who follows YOUR beliefs of what Christians should all be like, you’re going to go to hell and are incapable of love, so what does it matter what you think? You’ve yet to even show your credentials that make you qualified to decide that all atheists and agnostics have NPD.

Excuse me. I’m a lesbian, or, as you seem to be fond of saying, a “homo-gay”. I am all for teaching teenagers [not children, but those in middle school and high school, as that is around the time sexual education is taught in schools] that there is nothing “wrong” or “abnormal” with homosexuality, and that it is just as normal as heterosexuality.

YOU’RE the ones who DON’T want homosexuals to have the same rights as heterosexuals. Not me.

There are animals that are gay. Did you know that? Wouldn’t that imply that homosexuality is natural, even if homosexual sexual intercourse doesn’t result in children? Can’t people have sex for reasons OTHER than procreation? I mean, if sexual stimulation results in such high pleasure for most people, what’s wrong with people having sex for intimacy, because it is pleasurable?

Can you prove that homosexuality ISN’T natural, without resorting to the “It doesn’t make children, so gay sex is wrong, and homosexuality is therefore unnatural and abnormal” argument OR your Bible? Some people consider homosexuality to be something one is born with; others consider it a choice. I consider it to be a bit of both. Penises disgust me. I find women to be far more attractive than men. If your god made everyone, then are you saying that he made a mistake by making me? Free will aside, why wouldn’t he make it IMPOSSIBLE for homosexuality to exist, if it was so “wrong” and “disgusting”?

Actually I have heard people mention that there are gay animals in nature. I have not seen any and can’t refute this or agree with this. How does the percentage of gay/ non-gay animals in the wild kingdom compare to the percentage of?
1 gay humans?
2 Abnormalities/retardation in the animal kingdom?

They aren’t on the same level of comparison. They have NOTHING in common, and therefore can’t be compared to each other. Homosexuality isn’t “better” than retardation and abnormalities, because there are no similarities to make a “comparison” possible.

No that’s you twisting my words. You tell me you are gay, I believe you. I have no choice to because if you are lying well…. what then?
I hope being gay was a choice, because I’d like to hope you can choose lots of things.
But animals, well we can’t ask them. So if you see two animals in the woods and they are being “Gay” how do you know its Gay? How do you know it isn’t something else?

I think those questions were valid.

#1 If other mammals are just as gay as humans percentage wise, then one should be more inclined to think its natural. If it’s much higher in humans than in animals than you could say its less natural. Or if there are more gay animals than gay humans, than you could say that it would be natural to be more gay than we are. Its just statistics?
#2 Same question with abnormalities. Respectfully. It’s just science.

Like I said, its just a question. If people use “gay animals” as an argument then they should also be prepared to open that topic up. We cant ask these gay animals what they think. Maybe they know they are gay and happy about it or maybe they have brain damage. Or anywhere in-between. I’m listing extremes. I’m not suggesting that they actually have brain damage. I’m just really curious, because you brought it up.

I never did such a thing. I gave a range and admitted I don’t know. I also said it could be completely normal. And once again we are talking about animals, not human. If you also notice I said that it could be more normal than we expect.
Hows the Palouse today?

But you don’t think that a person who sees themselves as female, and expresses that gender in their dress, appearance, mannerisms, name, et cetera, can be a girl? That they’re only “artificially pretending”?

Guess what. There are SURGERIES to allow for the physical change of genitalia and chest regions for transgendered individuals. This girl is ten times the woman that I am, and one of the sweetest people I know.

On September 20 2008, then VP candidate, Gov Palin, sat down for an interview with Katie Couric. The last question asked Palin to clarify her position on homosexuality. This was the Governor’s answer: “But as for homosexuality, I am not going to judge Americans and the decisions that they make in their adult personal relationships. I have one of my absolute best friends for the last 30 years happens to be gay, and I love her dearly. And she is not my “gay friend,” she is one of my best friends, who happens to have made a choice that isn’t a choice that I have made. But I am not going to judge people.”

On September 20 2008, then VP candidate, Gov Palin, sat down for an interview with Katie Couric. The CBS anchor’s final question asked Palin to clarify her position on homosexuality. Palin is a congregant of Wasilla Bible Church, one that believes the power of prayer can turn gay people straight. This was the Governor’s answer: “But as for homosexuality, I am not going to judge Americans and the decisions that they make in their adult personal relationships. I have one of my absolute best friends for the last 30 years happens to be gay, and I love her dearly. And she is not my “gay friend,” she is one of my best friends, who happens to have made a choice that isn’t a choice that I have made. But I am not going to judge people.”

Yes, but you listed the possibility that gay behavior in animals could perhaps be explained by brain damage. Thus, you are suggesting that homosexuality has a possible link to brain damage, which, to a gay person and to people who support gays, such as myself, is very insulting.

How would you like it if scientists came out and said: “Maybe Christians know that they are Christian and are happy about it or maybe they have brain damage.”

Claire, homosexuals are not normal. Children will ask why some people have two fathers or two mothers. Teachers and normal parents will have to explain the perversion. The nation does not want to do this and I hope the matter eventually reaches the Supreme Court and all gays are not allowed to have official marriages.

I will do everything my power to ensure gays cannot adopt children. I will pray that every gay union becomes no more than that. Gays are free to do whatever they want at home. I just want them to keep their bedroom antics at that and not try to make it into a national agenda, where their lifestyle is coerced upon society at large.

“Claire, homosexuals are not normal. Children will ask why some people have two fathers or two mothers. Teachers and normal parents will have to explain the perversion. The nation does not want to do this and I hope the matter eventually reaches the Supreme Court and all gays are not allowed to have official marriages.”

One, you aren’t the nation.

Two, unless it violates the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court can’t ban gay marriages. There is nothing in the Constitution that defines marriage as being between a man and a woman. The Christian Bible is not the Constitution.

“I will do everything my power to ensure gays cannot adopt children.”

Newsflash: For the most part, homosexuals can adopt children, or have them via a surrogate mother or artificial insemination.

“I will pray that every gay union becomes no more than that.”

Yeah, because begging your god to pretty please stop two people who love each other from being married is going to work.

“Gays are free to do whatever they want at home. I just want them to keep their bedroom antics at that and not try to make it into a national agenda, where their lifestyle is coerced upon society at large.”

We don’t discuss our “bedroom antics” outside of the home. However, we DO want the right to marry whomever we so desire, regardless of gender. Love is love. Deal with it.

If you’re so worried about our lifestyle being “coerced upon society at large”, why don’t you stop forcing your lifestyle on society?

Has anyone noticed that the people running this website are obsessed with sex? For people who say they condemn sex, they sure do talk about it a lot. Sodomy, sex toys, girls’ vaginas, masturbation, bestiality… they have nothing better to talk about, Geez, go read the gospels and see how much Jesus, you know, they guy that hung out with prostitutes, talked about sex.

PLEASE READ THIS COMMENT. ITS EDUACATIONAL.
im 13, and im bi (meaning i like both genders) and i do NOT like animals like THAT. ugh, you people are so ignorant! i swear you are brain damaged! it’s like… UGH. heres an explanation of “gay” for you, because obviously you dont know what it means.

a gay is someone who likes people of the same gender. gay men like men for the same reasons women like them. and gay women like women for the same reasons men like them. do you understand? they dont like animals, thats another thing. thats beastiality, those people are sexually attracted to animals. (i dont really agree with sex with animals but whatever) and beasiality is not the same thing as gay. those are 2 diffirent things. and bi is when you like both genders. (still no animals) i think that you people should study up on gay culture before you go and judge it with no evidence other than your own jacked up thoughts about it.