Re: openoffice

On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 12:11 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:32:25 -0800 (PST), Dan Hollis <goemon anime net> wrote:
> > > Why not make both available? After all, fedora includes both gcc3.x and
> > > gcc4, although gcc4 definitely has issues.
> > how big are the gcc3.x and gcc4.x package sets?
> > how big are the openoffice.org packages?
> > Considering the size of openoffice I think it would be irresponsible
> > to choose to ship multiple versions of it in Core considering the need
> > to be respectful of overall bloat.
>
> any reason it can't be made available on extras?
>
> if not, then the question would be -- does it get released later as a yum
> update to completely replace openoffice1, or does it wait till FC5?
>
b/c it is not an extra.
it would be an alternative.
-sv