The blog for Charlsie Russell's Loblolly Writer's House. Love and romance, sex, violence, mystery, suspense, and happily ever after from the deepest of the Deep South. Subjects include writing, independent publishing, book marketing, and history.

Get Charlsie Russell's Books At These Online Stores

Saturday, February 3, 2018

They Gulped the Blood and Gobbled the Flesh...

A post in the “Skewing Southern History Series”

It’s been a while since I’ve posted, but I’d become strained
doing too many things at once and finishing nothing, so last summer I took a hiatus from blogging. My historical research, however, has not suffered, only the dissemination of my findings, aside from comments and what I hope have been
appropriate shares on Google Plus, Twitter, and to a lesser extent, Facebook. But as I’ve stated before, sometimes something crosses one’s path that cannot be left go. Such was a Pinterest prompt for my “Confederacy” board on which I pin photos of Confederate soldiers, Southern memorials, and other such tidbits related to a short-lived sovereign nation to which I pay homage.

The prompt was a photo of an unidentified
Confederate soldier in cavalry boots (which I would have naturally pinned). I
clicked the photo and was taken to an All
Things Interesting article published on 27 September 2017. The title of the
article was “America’s Darkest Hour: 39 Haunting Photos of The Civil War.” Now
I’m not real big on dead soldiers on the battle ground, even Yankee ones, which
considering my loyalties might be considered a little more palatable...though certainly not much. All I wanted was the fella in cavalry boots. But one had to click to go somewhere else to see the photos,
so I started reading the article instead. At the git-go, it appeared to be a
bipartisan accounting of a terrible tragedy that happened a long time ago; in
short, a quick overview to accompany the photos, an account one would write for
a child or foreigner who’d just parachuted in here and knew nothing of our War
Between the States [talk about fire bells clamoring in the night]. I’ve got a
pretty good laywoman’s knowledge of events, so initially there was nothing in
there I wasn’t aware of. Then, halfway through the article (it isn’t a long one)
came something I was not familiar
with. I quote:

“For
four deadly years, the country endured not only its bloodiest and most vicious
military conflict, but also some of its cruelest racial hatred. Adding to the
already immense heap of skulls, Confederates used disease, starvation,
exposure, and outright execution to kill hundreds of thousands of former slaves
during the war, a figure not included in death toll estimates thanks to a
deliberate lack of record keeping.”

Not “hundreds”, y’all, not even “thousands”, but hundreds of thousands. And exactly when did
this “lack of evidence” proving the occurrence of genocide come to light? And
speaking of creating fact from non-existent evidence, why didn’t the writer take the gruesome lie one step further and explain away the
absence of hundreds of thousands of Negroid skulls? Allow me to demonstrate: “There’s
no evidence of the holocaust dear gullible reader (the article’s readership) because the Confederates ate
the murdered slaves.”

Ha, you see, I really can write compelling fiction! Yes
siree, that’s the perfect sequel to this horror story being attributed to my Southern
ancestors, and my embellishment makes so much sense. The Confederates were,
after all, hungry. Shortages were rampant due to invasion and blockade, so they
“gulped the blood and gobbled the flesh and greedily gorged on the lifeless
corpse[s].”* And once they had eaten their fill, they boiled the fat for soap,
then ground the skeletal mass into meal for bread and cake. That’s why today’s fine
teams of modern investigative journalists, such as the writer of the dung defecated in the ATI article, can’t find where the bodies are buried.

Let’s break down the above paragraph further.
Consider the line about “a deliberate lack of record keeping?” That alone should
tell any reasonable reader how far the writer will go to insult his
intelligence. Why, if one were to do such a thing, would the executioners make
a record of it? It’s not as if the victims had property to account for; they were property. Maybe that explains it. The executioners were keeping the murders secret from the rightful owners who were off somewhere else fighting Yankees. Ya think? Duh. Consider, too, the time it would have taken away from the
army’s defending against invaders. I wonder if the writer of the article has any idea how many Yankees were running around in the South between 1862-1865. Certainly enough to come across hundreds of thousands of murdered slaves. I wonder if he/she even knows Yankees invaded the South or where the war was fought? Besides, don’t you know [I’m being facetious
here], few Southerners could read and write, so keeping a record would have
been difficult.

But the underlying implications are more sinister than that.
Note the use of the words “deliberate lack...” By referencing a perceived
requirement for such a record, of which someone
in a position of power would have made a conscious effort to forgo, the writer
is implicating the Confederate government in a conspiracy to annihilate its
Negro population. Where exactly is the writer of this article going with this?

Yes, well, I know, too.

Next, let’s look at the line “used disease, starvation,
exposure, and outright execution....” That is blatant plagiarism of Southern
charges of Federal excesses (national policy) against Southern civilians, black
and white. That is precisely where the writer of the ATI article stole that
line. Such policy is a component of total war and during the War Between the
States was routinely carried out by Federal officers in command in the South as
sanctioned by their civilian head, Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, and blessed
by their sanctified leader Abraham Lincoln.

The charge against the Confederacy is, of course, false, and the proof (other than those yet-to-be-uncovered heaps up skulls) is evident
by the simple fact that such horrendous deeds make no sense. There’s no record,
not because of poor record keeping or pre-sanctioned omission, but because it
didn’t happen. Why would Southerners who had, for two and a half centuries,
lived intimately with the Negro: Slept with him, ate with him, nursed and been
nursed by him, fought and died along side him for more than two centuries in our nation’s struggles leading up to the War Between the States suddenly start exterminating him?
I’m not talking about Negroes who fell
behind enemy lines and ended up in the Federal army. They chose to take up arms
as soldiers (or we could hope so, anyway) and were fair game like all soldiers taking
up arms and invading the sovereign South.

The charge of premeditated extermination [and that’s what
paragraph four of the ATI article is] is equally oxymoronic in light of the
fallacious argument that the South seceded to preserve slavery..., then decided to exterminate its slaves?
But wait! Maybe we’ve stumbled upon yet another point to ponder. Is the
“all about slavery” narrative morphing into “it was all about removing the perceived inferior race from the United States?”

Sorry, folks, that exclusive “white-man’s-only nation” attitude
was the battle cry of another group.

I’m not going to argue that the antebellum white Southerner
wasn’t racist; he definitely was. But his racism was predominantly benevolent, and no matter how
demeaning that benevolence, it falls well shy of atrocity. I say this, one, because
Southerners are basically good people and, two, because that benevolence helped them
justify the institution. It was the Northern attitude towards the Negro that
was malevolent and that malevolence played out against the “contaminated” South
and white Southerners, who had supposedly degenerated vis-à-vis their superior Northern counterparts after two hundred
and fifty years of intimacy with the Negro race. In my
opinion, and this is strictly my opinion, the greatest shame of the Southern Democrats and
the modern Klan (not the original) is their self-aggrandizing embracing, then
making truth of, a Yankee lie.

In light of the sordid tale of genocide
masquerading as “fact” presented above, the rather slipshod description of
Davis’ capture near the end of the article comes as no surprise.

I had never heard of All
Things Interesting, but it has a substantial readership and is part of the
online media, PBH Network.There
are no by lines, attributions, or supporting references in the 27 September
article. Whoever wrote the
thing conducted only superficial research in slapping the piece together. They
are unconcerned with the war, its causes, its
repercussions, or the people involved. They are either convinced that all right-thinking Americans
regard those who defended/still defend the Confederacy as either dead or to have
seen the light and become “good” Americans, or they’re trying to convince the
rest of us that’s the case. Extant defenders are nothing more than lunatics who
support “proven” racist traitors and represent only a fringe of the Southern population.

Promulgation of such lies is what ATI counts on to grow its
readership. That’s how propaganda works. The Left (assuming ATI isn’t financed
by the Left) finds such ignorance a useful tool to achieve its agenda. This is the legacy “neo-conservatives”, many
in leadership positions across the South, have left us. A large number of Americans
don’t know where this nation, or they themselves, came from. They look at America’s
ante-bellum past as they do that of the Roman Republic: It was long ago, and
there’s no one invested in it any longer. They feel right in saying and/or
accepting whatever nonsense they “think they know,” packaging it as truth, and
shouting it to the world if it furthers their agenda. These born-yesterday
Americans derive from two different sources, new arrivals and the much more
egregious multi-generationals who
find validation in detaching themselves from ancestors who sacrificed their
immortal souls, according to their progeny’s self-righteous interpretation of
right and wrong, to give them what they have today. We in the South have long
been blessed with a paucity of both. Disgracefully, the number among the latter
is growing.

*Beowulf for those
of you who have forgotten that classic example of old-English alliteration from
high school.

No comments:

Post a Comment

I encourage you to leave comments. I'll reply to all questions within a week, and errors in the posts will be acknowledged in the comment area. Feel free to answer questions/clarify confusion I express in my posts. Disagree with my points if you believe there is need for disagreement, but keep in mind that all off-topic comments, disparaging comments, comments with more than one link, and comments that include profanity will be deleted.

Tweet to Share

Google+ Followers

The Author

About Me

Author of
historical suspense set in my home state of Mississippi: Love, romance,
sex, violence, mystery, and suspense set in the deepest of the Deep South. I
liken my work to a cross between Frank Yerby's bitter beauty of the South
and the romance and happily-ever-after of Zane Grey. I'm a conservative
believer in "state rights."