March 4, 2014

Obama puts Israel on notice

Israel's "PR problem" is actually a reaction to its indefensible policies, and the US has just issued a blunt warning

Many Israelis and their friends
are well aware they have an "image problem." But what far too many of
them fail to appreciate is that their country’s policies and conduct are
primarily responsible for Israel’s worsening reputation. What is
perceived to be a PR problem is actually a "reality problem." And
realities have consequences.

Many Israelis feel they are being
singled out, particularly in a turbulent and oppressive Middle East, by
unfair double standards. After all, they note, 130,000 people have been
killed in Syria in the past three years. But this is a bubble of
delusion. There's almost never been a society that wasn't able to point
to another state with worse behavior, or at least as bad, to try to
argue there is something unfair about the criticism they face.
Apartheid-era South Africa pointed to a plethora of genuinely
reprehensible and bloodthirsty African dictators to try to argue they
looked mild in comparison. That didn't work then, and it won't work now.

Israel and its friends need to wake up. The rising tide of criticism
against the country’s policies isn't being driven by anti-Semitism,
which is a fringe factor. And it's not a campaign of "delegitimization"
either, because most of this growing criticism in mainstream Western
discourse doesn't question the fundamental legitimacy of the Israeli
state. The occupation that began in 1967 coupled with how Israel is
conducting itself today as an occupying power is a reality that Israelis
and many of their friends in the West are refusing to face.

Israel's Central Bureau of Statistics has just reported
that settlement construction, which is strictly prohibited under
international law (most notably the Fourth Geneva Convention, Article
49, paragraph 6), increased by an astonishing 123% during 2013 as
opposed to the previous year. And there's every indication that
settlement expansion is continuing to surge in 2014.

Settlement activity, for many Israelis, simply means building houses
for Jews. But the reason it's banned by the Geneva Convention is that it
is a human rights abuse against any civilian population living under
foreign military occupation, who have a right not to be colonized.

Israelis seem genuinely surprised that a surge in international
criticism, and a growing refusal in Europe to fund or cooperate with any
Israeli activity in the occupied territories, should accompany this
surge in settlement activity. But it was inevitable.

And it's
not just the taking of land from Palestinians, or the fact that Israel
rules over millions of disenfranchised non-citizens with no end in
sight, or even the fact that Israelis and Palestinians living in the
occupied territories operate under completely separate and extremely
unequal systems of law, rights, and responsibilities.

Amnesty International has just issued a new report
accusing Israeli occupation forces of "a harrowing pattern of unlawful
killings and unwarranted injuries of Palestinian civilians by Israeli
forces in the West Bank." The report says many of the killings appeared
to be willful and unnecessary, and could very well constitute "war
crimes."

Israel, of course, dismisses all this criticism. And
many Israelis see it as at least grotesquely unfair if not downright
anti-Semitic. But this is delusional. No state behaving like this,
particularly one that is deeply intertwined with the West and the global
system and marketplace, can or should expect to be immune from
criticism and consequences.

And so Israelis and their friends should take careful note of what US President Barack Obama told Jeffrey Goldberg in an interview
timed perfectly to coincide with this year's annual AIPAC convention.
Obama pledged the United States would staunchly support Israel, but
bluntly warned, “If Palestinians come to believe that the possibility of
a contiguous sovereign Palestinian state is no longer within reach,
then our ability to manage the international fallout is going to be
limited.”

Indeed, it's unlikely that Europeans would be pursuing their de facto
settlement boycott campaign if they felt the United States either
planned to, or was capable of, restraining them. So it's not just a
question of the American "ability" to protect Israel from the
consequences of indefensible policies that are so damaging to the
prospects of the two-state solution. There is even a question about the
American will to do so.

What Obama, and many other friends of Israel including prominent
Jewish Americans, are trying to tell Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
and Israeli society is that they don't have an "image problem." They
have a reality problem. Israel's occupation, and its policies toward the
Palestinians, are realities that cannot be defended internationally.

If Israel wants to continue to entrench the occupation, expand
settlements, and oppress the disenfranchised Palestinians while
pretending that it really isn't a big deal or a priority, or that the
status quo is sustainable, no one can stop them. But, Obama and others
are bluntly saying, no one can save them from the consequences either.