took about 20 minutes the first time through, about 10 minutes for the second one I did. There are some limitations, it seems you can only have all of the custom maps on or off, no individual selectivity.

OK so I have to admit my head cold is probably not helping me right now, but let me post this theoretical question about this technology...

Am I reading this correctly that if I had a trail map of a Three Rivers Park for example that I scan in and do the overlay thingy, I could in theory have a map on my Oregon showing me where all the trails are (according to their mapping abilities?)

OK so I have to admit my head cold is probably not helping me right now, but let me post this theoretical question about this technology...

Am I reading this correctly that if I had a trail map of a Three Rivers Park for example that I scan in and do the overlay thingy, I could in theory have a map on my Oregon showing me where all the trails are (according to their mapping abilities?)

I don't have an Oregon to test it, but that's my understanding as well. You would scan in the map as a jpg and overlay it in google. You stretch and move it until it matches and then you get a map layer for that. Could be interesting, but when you can get trail maps now as a layer from various sites and have more parks, why spend the time? I can see a limited usage of this, but I think there are better ways._________________Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.