Rights to use material on this website

The material on this site, "www.standardpascal.org",
with exceptions, is placed in the public domain.
It can be used freely, It can be placed on another website, it can be printed.
It can be sold. It can be incorporated into other material. I have no responsibility
for what you do with it. I am not responsible for any harm caused by its use.
With any use of the material, you accept full responsibility for any harm that
occurs from its use or misuse. You need not provide me with any notification
of its use, nor do I need to provide you with permission to use it.

The following material is excepted from this:

1. The material from the "1984 CDC6000 Pascal compiler",
which carries its own rights agreement from the University of Minnesota. The
rights for this material are according to the agreement, which is included on
this website conspicuously at the top of the material.

Comments on the meaning of public domain

In the United States, the term and concept of "public domain"
explicitly appeared in the law governing copyright. Specifically, it stated
that a work would fall into the public domain unless specifically copyrighted.

With the adoption of the Berne Convention, an international
treaty, the United States copyrights became governed by the Berne convention
copyright laws known as "Berne Convention
for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works". In short, it specifies
that copyright is automatic, and it may not be required to specifically attach
a copyright to the work for it to be subject to such "automatic copyright".

I, as I am sure many others, believe the omission of the public domain
from the official language of the copyright law is a mistake. Public domain
works are a tradition that goes back centuries. Public domain serves
an important purpose of freely disseminating knowledge. There are many reasons
why a work would be given to the public domain, not all of them non-commercial.

In any case, I don't think that the public domain is dissolved
with the Berne convention. The first proof of this is that the Berne Convention
text (which you can read above) specifically mentions "public domain",
even if it does not define it. The second proof of this is that the Berne Convention
text itself is freely distributed without claims of rights
of any kind. The Berne Convention text itself is public domain.
It constitutes both an example of a public domain work, and also of why the
public domain exists, since it would hardly do to publish a law on what rights
of distribution are, which is itself restricted in publication!

Further, there is no precedence for a work that was specifically
committed to the public domain, which was then later removed from the public
domain and copyrighted. Any disputes have centered around the concept
of what it means to "commit to the public domain", which was never
codified by law, either by Berne Convention, or previous United States
copyright laws.

I assert here the opinion that specifically stating that I release
the works on this website from any rights, and commit it to the public domain,
qualifies as defacto proof that the works are, in fact, in the public domain.
I am not a lawyer, but I don't believe there is any possibility that one could
claim that a work, once committed to the public domain, could be then claimed
as under copyright.