GEIER COLUMN: Should RGIII have been cleared to play?

The Washington Redskins' rookie quarterback underwent knee surgery Wednesday to treat a torn ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) and LCL (lateral collateral ligament). Given the fact that he needed repair of his LCL, and that it is a second ACL reconstruction (revision ACL operations generally have lower success rates and often longer recoveries for athletes), concern that RG3 might miss the 2013 season is at least warranted.

But, Redskins' team physician Dr. James Andrews was optimistic Griffin would be back on the field sooner.

“We expect a full recovery, and it is everybody's hope and belief that due to Robert's high motivation, he will be ready for the 2013 season,” Andrews said in a statement released by the team. “The goal of his treatment is to give him the best opportunity for a long professional career.”

The most hotly contested aspect of his injury Sunday centers around whether he should have been on the field in the first place.

USA Today's Robert Klemko reported Sunday that Andrews said that he never cleared RG3 to play after his initial injury Dec. 9. After seemingly conflicting reports from coach Mike Shanahan and a later clarification by Dr. Andrews, it appears that Griffin never had trainers or team doctors check his knee before he ran back on the field. Griffin could not play effectively, and the team quickly took him out.

A later MRI reportedly showed only a grade I sprain of his LCL. After missing the next game against the Cleveland Browns, he returned in a knee brace to play the final two regular season games. While he was on the field, it was evident he lacked his usual ability to run and change directions. It was expected that he would continue to improve each week and hopefully be near 100 percent on Sunday for the team's first home playoff appearance in 13 years.

Fast forward to the first quarter Sunday. Late in their second touchdown drive, RGIII landed awkwardly and was in obvious pain. After the touchdown that put the Redskins up 14-0, Griffin went to the training room to be examined by the medical staff. He returned to play but clearly appeared to be limited.

Thousands of fans in attendance and millions watching on television saw his knee buckle horrifically as he tried to change directions running down a bad snap in the fourth quarter.

After the game, Griffin told reporters that he was determined to play after his first-quarter injury. Shanahan said that Griffin told him, “Coach, there's a difference between injured and being hurt. I can guarantee I'm hurting right now — give me a chance to win this football game, because I can guarantee I'm not injured.”

The question that fans and media have been asking since Sunday was whether RGIII should have been allowed to play or whether coaches or doctors should have held him out after that first injury.

Obviously I wasn't in the training room Sunday, so I cannot offer an opinion specifically in this case. There is no indication that Griffin played against medical advice or that doctors let him play despite a serious injury. I am not judging the decision to let RGIII play.

In general, though, there are two basic questions a team physician has to answer to decide whether to allow any player back into a game after an injury.

Is the player likely to make the injury worse by returning to the game?

Can the player effectively do his or her job on the field?

While each injury is different, the decision-making process itself is that simple. For example, if an athlete tears her ACL in a soccer game but wants to keep playing, the doctor should remove her. Her knee will likely give way when she tries to change directions or land from a jump. If her knee buckles, she risks further injury, such as damage to a meniscus, articular cartilage, or another ligament.

Likewise, if an athlete has a mild shoulder separation, he probably won't make it worse by going back in. But if he is a free safety who can't lift his arm to make a tackle because of pain, he isn't helping himself or his team.

In both cases, the team doctor would decide to hold the player out. However, if the athlete has an injury where he does not risk further harm to himself and he can do his job on the field, then we usually let him try to play, watching closely for signs of trouble.

In his post-game press conference, Griffin emphatically stated, “I'm the quarterback of this team. My job is to be out there if I can play. And to answer the next question, no, I don't feel like me being out there hurt the team in any way. I'm the best option for this team, and that's why I'm the starter.”

It is this heart and determination, on top of their athletic ability, that makes fans enjoy watching these elite athletes compete. And that determination to return from injury and rehab from surgery makes them a joy to treat as orthopaedic surgeons.

As team doctors, though, we have to make sure that athletes who fight to play through injuries aren't hurting themselves in the process.

Dr. David Geier is an orthopaedic surgeon and Director of MUSC Sports Medicine. For more information about football injuries and other sports medicine topics, go to Dr. Geier's blog at drdavidgeier.com

Comments

Notice about comments:

The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point.

We do not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click the X that appears in the upper right corner when you hover over a comment. This will send the comment to Facebook for review. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full terms and conditions.