I think it would be nice if finding objects on the ground were more important. On the other hand, with fuzzy detection, that would be much more irritating.

What are you talking about? A lot of the good loot is found on the ground--most often in vaults or special rooms, but sometimes on the common dungeon floor. Monster drops are only really important for midgame uniques, before vaults start to dominate the landscape. Okay, in the lategame vaults, the big monsters drop some of the good stuff, but they're mainly there to kill you rather than as a loot source. That's why TO vault-clearing is a useful strategy even though it doesn't kill anything.

OK, I've been promising to say something concrete here for a while; this will be vague, but hopefully indicative. I'll just list some ideas I currently have; it's not exhaustive, and some of them may not make it in the end:

Looking at Thraalbee's page shows that there are many new monsters up to DL45, and few after that. A lot of the early monsters need to be either toughened and moved deeper, or replaced with deeper versions.

There are a number of monsters I am considering including from FA; for example:

Crows of Udun

various archers

Abyss spiders

Nrulings

Serpents of the Brownlands

Giant black scorpions

Beastmasters

Skeleton serpents

Dark nagas

Serpents of Chaos

Giant paladins

Children of Ungoliant

Wolves of Sauron

Sky dragons

Hounds of Tindalos

Many of these include the LASH spell (which is like a 2-3 grid ranged attack based on the monster's first melee blow), so I want to add that too

__________________
“We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see.”
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

OK, I've been promising to say something concrete here for a while; this will be vague, but hopefully indicative. I'll just list some ideas I currently have; it's not exhaustive, and some of them may not make it in the end:

I'd be sorry to lose some of the other stuff from upstream on this thread, like frogs jumping...

What are you talking about? A lot of the good loot is found on the ground--most often in vaults or special rooms, but sometimes on the common dungeon floor. Monster drops are only really important for midgame uniques, before vaults start to dominate the landscape. Okay, in the lategame vaults, the big monsters drop some of the good stuff, but they're mainly there to kill you rather than as a loot source. That's why TO vault-clearing is a useful strategy even though it doesn't kill anything.

Huh, looks like you're right. I've been blaming the wrongs things for the phenomenon that V characters have absolutely ridiculous access to stuff. Even so, I feel like hunting down shallow monsters should not be a viable strategy deep in the dungeon, and currently it rather is. For one thing, the most effective form of statgain is murdering orcs at dlvl 70. That feels wrong.

Probably not at this point, although it's something to think about. In FA they only appeared outside dungeons (IIRC), were based on player races, and were designed to appear closer to that race's home town; there isn't quite the same rationale for having them in V.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antoine

I'd be sorry to lose some of the other stuff from upstream on this thread, like frogs jumping...

Yes, I'll certainly look back at this thread.

__________________
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.

Hmm, I'm wondering if this idea came up ever before, but: how about having monsters with native depths of 100 or higher (in addition to the existing monsters, of course)? They would serve to make deep vaults more interesting, especially when comparing them to slightly more shallow ones. E.g. a "monster up to 40 levels out of depth" tile on a DL80 vault could spawn a monster from a depth of up to 120; currently, those tiles will pick monsters from the exact same lists once the player reaches DL60, since no monsters with depths >= 100 exist. And it would also make the postgame more interesting when the player decides to venture down all the way to DL127.

Hmm, I'm wondering if this idea came up ever before, but: how about having monsters with native depths of 100 or higher (in addition to the existing monsters, of course)? They would serve to make deep vaults more interesting, especially when comparing them to slightly more shallow ones. E.g. a "monster up to 40 levels out of depth" tile on a DL80 vault could spawn a monster from a depth of up to 120; currently, those tiles will pick monsters from the exact same lists once the player reaches DL60, since no monsters with depths >= 100 exist. And it would also make the postgame more interesting when the player decides to venture down all the way to DL127.

Some variants have done this. One of the problems is that the monster we have at about 70-80 level are pretty much at the maximum stat-wise that we should expect from non-unique monsters. You could make some unique-statted monsters that are more deep but in reality, those monsters aren't any more dangerous than the non-unique monsters. They just tend to have more HP and require more resources to kill. The difference between Ancalagon and a Great Wyrm of Many Colors is that Ancalagon has more HP, that's pretty much it. Lungorthin isn't that much more dangerous than a greater balrog.