Fordama wrote:Indeed. The irony of getting all nipply about the CO2 excess pumped into the system can help some vegetation is delicious because the same people deny that CO2 can effect temperature and climate change shows an insane need to deny reality.

It isn't delicious. It's actually a great and wonderful thing! More food for animals and makes the climate better! And who here is saying CO2 doesn't warm the earth? Post their exact quote(s) with the links so we can verify that what you said isn't a lie.

Imagine the economic damage from our and other countries cities covered in miles of ice for 10,000 yrs vs a few more hurricanes, tornados, droughts, rainstorms, and flooding during this same amount of time. Not to mention that we'd build up sea walls and do other things to mitigate the dangerous effects of bad weather caused by Exxon, Chevron, and Shell beforehand...

“We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done.”

Green energy is still the future. Whether or not the Rockefeller Institute is involved.

They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

I agree that green energy may indeed be the future. But it's not the alarmist "Oh my God, if we don't do it right now we're all dead tomorrow" future. Hopefully we take as long as it takes to get it right.

Nor is it a conspiracy to subjugate. Which is being done in a de facto way by the fossil fuel industry.

They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

It is 100% true that sustainability is a socialist plan for the world which was partially funded by the Rockefeller foundation.

It is also 100% true that communists support and push socialism.

Odds are good that sustainability is then a trojan horse for global communism.

“We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done.”

Can't be worse than the subjugation and national resources spent propping up and supporting the fossil fuels industry.

It's still the future.

They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

"Can't be worse than the subjugation and national resources spent propping up and supporting the fossil fuels industry."

Speaking of propping. From Bloomberg, Oct 2, 2017"By the end of the year, electric-car maker Tesla Inc. will have burned through more than $10 billion without ever having made 10 cents."

“We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done.”

Wabash wrote:Nor is it a conspiracy to subjugate. Which is being done in a de facto way by the fossil fuel industry.

How exactly are oil companies conspiring to subjugate us?

“We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done.”

I guess you believe the last two wars in Iraq were fought for democracy and freedom.

I could be wrong.

They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

“We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done.”

Given that taxpayers are bearing the costs of fighting for corporate interests directly related to the fossil fuels industry, I would agree.

They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

"Given that taxpayers are bearing the costs of fighting for corporate interests directly related to the fossil fuels industry, I would agree."

Not the reason why.

After we removed Saddam, Jalal Talabani was 'elected' president of Iraq in 2005. He is also a VP in socialistinternational.org.

In summary, we sacrificed the lives of US soldiers, spent over a trillion dollars, and then 'let' Iraq 'elect' somebody who just happens to be a VP in socilaistinternational.org. How did this little commie fact evade the 'conservatives' in the Bush admin.? Simple. Bush was no conservative.

And you know damn well that the US 'influenced' the outcome of that election so that Talabani got elected. Its what we do.

“We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done.”

They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

The fact of the matter is, sustainability is a socialist plan for the world.

The Iraq fiasco was arguably also for socialism given that Bush and the US Gov *most likely* made sure Talabani won.

“We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done.”

kramer wrote:Source of the post The fact of the matter is, sustainability is a socialist plan for the world.

Then I'm good with it.

They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

Fordama wrote:After years of you whining, pleading, and posting ridiculous articles trying to convince people that CO2 that we put out could not have an effect on the environment!!!

What I've posted are articles that shoot down claims of CO2 induced bad weather, flooding, etc.

“We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done.”

No. You don't like it because it diminishes the alarmist tone of CO2 being responsible for bad weather.

This is discomforting to you because it lessens the reason of using the bane of free white men (CO2 emissions) to bring about global communism.

“We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done.”