I have been following the evolving "pandemic'of H1N1 influenza
beginning with the original discovery of the infection in Mexico
in March of this year. In the course of this study I have tried
to utilize as my sources high-quality, peer-reviewed journals,
data from the CDC and accepted textbooks of virology.

As with all such studies one has to integrate and correlate
previous experiences with epidemics and pandemics. As you
will see, a great deal of my material comes from official
sources, such as the Center for Disease Control and Prevention,
the National Institutes of Health, the National Institutes
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the New England
Journal of Medicine. Thus my distracters cannot claim
that I am using material that is not within the mainstream.

Pregnant Women
NOT at Special Risk from Swine Flu

In the beginning, even before it was declared a level 6 pandemic
by the World Health Organization (WHO), a group of "scientists'were sounding the alarm that this might indeed be the terrifying,
deadly pandemic they had been expecting for over half a century.

Naturally, the vaccine manufacturers were doing all they
could to fuel this fear and they were quietly making deals
with WHO to be among the companies selected to manufacture
the "pandemic'vaccine for the world. Being anointed by
WHO would guarantee tens of billions in profits.

As the infection began to spread into the United States and
then the rest of the world, its peculiar nature became obvious.
Those born before 1950 seem to have a high degree of resistance
to the infection and the disease seems slightly more pathogenic
(disease causing) among those aged 25 to 49. Early on the
official sources declared that pregnant women were at a special
risk as compared to the seasonal flu.1 As we shall
see later, this was a grand lie.

Initial Studies
Show H1N1 NOT Dangerous or Highly Contagious

Once the pandemic had been declared, virologists tested the
potency of this virus using a conventional method, that is,
infecting ferrets with the virus.2 What they found
was that the H1N1 virus was no more pathogenic than the ordinary
seasonal flu, even though it did penetrate slightly deeper
into the lungs. It in no way matched the pathogenecity of
the 1917-1918 H1N1 virus. It also did not infect other tissues,
and especially important, it did not infect the brain.

Next, they wanted to test the ability of the virus to spread
among the population. The results of their tests were conflicting,
but the best evidence indicated that the virus did not spread
to others very well. In fact, an unpublished study by the
CDC found that when one member of a family contracted the
H1N1 virus, other members of the family were infected only
10% of the time -- a very low communicability.

This was later confirmed in a study of the experience of
New York State, in which only 6.9% of the population contracted
the virus, far below the 50% predicted by the President's
Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.3
It is instructive to note that during the 1917-18 Swine flu
epidemic the world infection rate was only 20%.4

They also predicted that 1.8 million people would need hospitalization
and 300,000 would end up in the intensive care units (ICU).
Further, they predicted that hospitals would be overwhelmed
and that ICU units would not have enough beds to care for
the sick and dying. Incredibly, they predicted that 90,000
people would die.

Much Fear Mongering

Not satisfied, they up the ante on fear mongering by peddling
the idea that pregnant women were especially in danger as
were small children. We were told daily that young, healthy
people were dying, not just those with underlying medical
conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes, cancer and other
immune suppressive diseases. The Minister of Fear (the CDC)
was working overtime peddling doom and gloom, knowing that
frightened people do not make rational decisions -- nothing
sells vaccines like panic.

These same dire predictions were extended to Australia and
New Zealand, which began to show an increase in their reported
cases of H1N1 and associated hospitalizations as they entered
their fall and winter. Recently, two major articles were released
in the New England Journal of Medicine, which analyzed
the American hospitalization experience5 and the
Australian/New Zealand ICU experience6. I will
analyze these very interesting studies.

There is a dramatic disconnect between what the science is
discovering about this flu virus and what is being broadcast
over the media outlets. As you will see, this is a very mild
flu virus infection for 99.9% of the population.

Australian
and New Zealand Experience Prove U.S. is Wrong

As I stated, the countries in the southern hemisphere have
already gone through their fall and winter, that is the seasons
of peak flu infections. Epidemiologists and virologists have
been surprised at how mild this flu pandemic has been in the
Southern Hemisphere, with relatively few deaths and few hospitalizations
in most areas.

The study reported in the New England Journal of Medicine
on October 8, 2009, called the AZIC study, analyzed all ICU
admissions in New Zealand and Australia, looking at a number
of factors.6 Here is what they found.

ICU Hospitalizations

Out of a population of 25 million people, 722 were admitted
to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a confirmed diagnosis
of H1N1 influenza. Overall, 856 people were admitted with
a flu virus, but 11.3% were a type A flu that was not subtyped
and 4.3% were seasonal flu.

They also analyzed the number of people admitted with viral
pneumonia and found the following:

Number of People Admitted to the Hospital each Year
with Viral Pneumonia5

57 people in 2005

33 people in 2006

69 people in 2007

69 people in 2008

37 people in 2009

So we see that in 2009 they had 32 fewer people admitted with
actual viral pneumonia. The CDC and other public health agents
of fear like to imply that mass numbers of people are dying
from "flu', that is, actual influenza viral pneumonia, when
in fact, most are dying from other complications secondary to
underlying health problems -- either diagnosed or undiagnosed.

They also found that the average person's risk of ending
up in the ICU was one in 35,714 or about
three thousandths of one percent (0.00285%), an incredibly
low risk. When they looked at actual admission to the ICU,
they found that it was people aged 25 to 49 who made up the
largest number admitted. Infants from birth to age 1 year
had the higher admission per population, and had a high mortality
rate.

Majority of
Children Respond POORLY to Flu Vaccine

It is interesting to note that babies this age respond poorly
to either the seasonal flu vaccine or the H1N1 vaccine. One
of the largest studies ever done, found that children below
the age of 2 years received no protection at all from the
seasonal flu vaccine.7

The recently completed study on the effectiveness of the
new H1N1 vaccine reported by the National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Disease found that 75% of
small children below age 35 months received no protection
from the H1N1 vaccine and that 65% of children
between the ages of 3 years and 9 years received no protection
from the vaccine.8

Flu Vaccine
DOUBLES Risk of Getting H1N1

It is also important to view this in the face of the new
unpublished Canadian study of 12 million people that found
getting the seasonal flu vaccine, as recommended by the CDC
and NIH, doubles one's risk of developing the H1N1 infection.
It would also make the infection much more serious. So much
for expert advice from the government.

Obese at Six
Times Higher Risk from H1N1 Complications

As stated, most authorities agree that the H1N1 variant virus
is quite mild as far as flu viruses go. The vast majority
of people (99.99%) are having very brief and mild illnesses
from this virus.

Keep in mind that when I am discussing numbers and risk,
this does not intend to understate the devastation experienced
by the people who are experiencing serious illness or even
death.

Any death is a tragedy.

What we are discussing here is -- is the risk from this virus
significant enough to justify draconian measures by the government
and medical community? Should we implement mass vaccinations
with a vaccine that is essentially an experimental vaccine,
poorly tested and of questionable benefit?

The study also looked at the health risk of the people admitted
to the ICU, but unfortunately did not look at the underlying
health problems of those who died. We get a hint, since the
American study did note that it was those over age 65 who
were most likely to die, and that 100% of
these individual had underlying health problems before they
were infected.

One of the real surprises from this study, and the American
study, was that one of the more powerful risk factors for
being admitted to the ICU and of dying was obesity. Obese
people are admitted 6x more often than those of normal weight.
As we shall see, obesity played a significant role in the
risk to children and pregnant women as well, something that
has never been discussed by the media, the CDC or the public
health officials.

This study found that 32.7% of those admitted
to the ICU had asthma or other chronic pulmonary disease,
far higher than the general population. The Australian and
New Zealand study also had a large number of aboriginal patients
and those from the Torres Strait. It is known that nutrient
deficiencies are common in both populations, which means an
impaired immune system.

Obesity is associated with a high incidence of insulin resistance
and metabolic syndrome, both of which would increase one's
risk of having a serious infection, even to viruses that are
mildly pathogenic. (mild viruses).

H1N1 Vaccine
is NOT Made the Same as Regular Flu Vaccine!!

I am really upset at the insistence by the CDC, medical doctors
and the media that all pregnant women should be vaccinated
by this experimental vaccine. The media repeats the manufacturers'mantra that this vaccine is produced exactly like the seasonal
flu, when in fact it is not. Yes, they use chicken eggs, but
the rest has been fast tracked and many shortcuts on safety
procedures have been allowed.

There are 250,000 pregnant women in Australia and New Zealand
combined. Only 66 pregnant women were admitted to the ICU,
an incidence of 1 pregnant woman per 3,800 pregnant women
or a risk of .03%.6 Put another
way, a pregnant woman in these two countries can feel comfortable
to know that there is a 99.97% chance that
she will not get sick enough to end up in the ICU.

Pregnant Women
NOT at Increased Risk, Obese Women Are!!

So, why did even 66 pregnant women end up in the ICU? As
we shall see in the American study5, a significant
number of these pregnant women were either obese or morbidly
obese and most had underlying medical problems. The Australian/New
Zealand study6 found that one of the major risk
factors for pregnant women was indeed being obese and that
obesity was associated with a high risk of underlying medical
disorders.

They also found that death from H1N1 infection correlated
best with increasing age, contrary to what the media says.
They concluded the study with the following statement:

" The proportion of patients who died in the hospital
in our study is no higher than that previously reported
among patients with seasonal influenza A who were admitted
to the ICU.'6

In fact, they report that of those infected with the H1N1
variant virus who were sick enough to be admitted to the ICU,
84.5 % went home and 14.3%
died and that of those admitted with seasonal flu 72.9%
were discharged and 16.2% died. That is,
more died from the seasonal flu.

Recent NEJM
Study of the American Experience

In the same Oct, 8th issue of the New England
Journal of Medicine they reported on the American experience
with the H1N1 variant virus.5 The study looked
at data from 24 states with widespread influenza infection
from April through June 2009. Remember, unlike most flu epidemics
in the United States, this epidemic began early and by the
end of September it was beginning to peak, with late October
being the date it may begin to decline.

The study examined 13,217 cases of infection involving 1082
people who were hospitalized. Here is what they found:

Underlying
Medical Conditions

Of the total hospitalized patients:

60% of children had underlying medical
conditions

83% of adults had underlying medical
conditions

They also found that 32% of patients had
at least 2 medical conditions that would put them at risk.
We are constantly told that it is the young adult aged 25
to 49 who is at the greatest risk. Note that 83%
of these people had underlying medical conditions. This means
that in truth only 292 "healthy'people
out of 1082 in 24 states were sick enough
to enter the hospital -- that is 292 healthy people out of
tens of millions of people, not much of a risk if you do not
have an underlying chronic medical problem.

Underlying
Medical Conditions Risk Factor for H1N1 Deaths

When they looked at people over age 65 years of age, that
is, the folks who are most likely to die in the hospital,
100% had underlying medical conditions --
all of them. So, there was not one healthy person over age
65 who has died out of 24 states combined.

What about the children, a special target of the fear mongering
media and government agencies? This study found that 60%
had underlying medical conditions and that 30%
were either obese or morbidly obese.

A previous CDC study states that 2/3 of children
who died had neurological disorders or respiratory diseases
such as asthma.3 If we take the 60%
figure, that means out of the 84 children reported to have
died by October 24th, 2009, only 34 children
considered healthy in a nation of 301 million people really
died, not 84. It is also instructive to note that according
to CDC figures, the seasonal flu last year killed 116
children.9

Remember, that is, 34 so-called healthy children out of a
nation of 40 million children. In 2003 it
was reported by the CDC that 90 children
died from seasonal flu complications. Ironically, as shown
by Neil Z. Miller in his excellent book -- Vaccine
Safety Manuel -- once the flu vaccine was given
to small children the death rate from flu increased 7-fold.10
Not surprising, since the mercury in the vaccine suppresses
immunity.

Pediatric Flu
Deaths by Year Made WORSE by Flu Vaccine

1999 -- - 29 deaths

2000 -- - 19 deaths

2001 -- - 13 deaths

2002 -- - 12 deaths

2003 -- - 90 deaths (Year of
mass vaccinations of children under age 5 years)

2006 -- 78 deaths

2007 -- - 88 deaths

2008 '116 deaths (40.9% vaccinated at age 6
months to 23 months)11

Parents should also keep in mind that this study, as well
as the Australian/New Zealand Study found that childhood obesity
played a major role in a child's risk of being admitted
to the ICU or dying. This is another dramatic demonstration
as to the danger of obesity in children and that all parents
should avoid MSG (all food-based excitotoxin additives), excess
sugar and excess high glycemic carbohydrates in their children's
diets. This goes for pregnant moms as well.

Every Parent
Needs to Know Other Vaccines INCREASE Risk of H1N1

One major factor being left out of all discussion of these
vaccines, especially those for small children and babies,
is the effect of other vaccinations on presently circulating
viral infections such as the H1N1 variant virus. It is known
that several of the vaccines are powerfully immune suppressing.
For example, the measles, mumps and rubella virus are all
immune suppressing, as seen with the MMR vaccine, a live virus
vaccine.12, 13

This means that when a child receives the MMR vaccine, for
about two to five weeks afterwards their immune system is
suppressed, making them highly susceptible to catching viruses
and bacterial infections circulating through the population.
Very few mothers are ever told this, even though it is well
accepted in the medical literature.

In fact, it is known that the Hib vaccine for haemophilus
influenzae is an immune suppressing vaccine and that vaccinated
children are at a higher risk of developing haemophilus influenzae
meningitis for at least one week after receiving the vaccine.10,14
These small children receive both of these vaccines.

According to the vaccine schedule recommended by the CDC
and used by most states, a child will receive their MMR vaccine
and Hib vaccine at one year of age and both are immune suppressing.

At age 2 to 4 months, they will receive a Hib vaccine. Therefore
at age 2 to 4 months, and again at age one year, they are
at an extreme risk of serious infectious complications caused
by vaccine-induced immune suppression. The New Zealand/Australian
study found that the highest death in the young was from birth
to age 12 months, the very time they were getting these immune-suppressing
vaccines.6

The so-called healthy children and babies that have ended
up in the hospital and have died may in fact be the victims
of immune suppression caused by their routine childhood vaccines.
We may never know because the medical elite will never record
such data or conduct the necessary studies. Recall also that
the seasonal flu vaccine, which is recommended for all babies
6 months to 35 months, is also immune suppressing because
of the mercury-containing thimerosal in the vaccine.15

If parents allow their children to be vaccinated according
to the CDC recommendations, that is 2 seasonal flu vaccines
and 2 swine flu vaccines as well as a pneumococcal vaccine,
that will increase the number of vaccines a child will have
by age 6 years to 41. This amounts to an
enormous amount of aluminum and mercury as well as intense
brain inflammation triggered by vaccine-induced microglial
activation.16

Risk of Serious
Illness from the H1N1 Mutant Virus

Their survey of 24 states found that a total of 67
patients out of tens of millions of people ended
up in the ICU. That is, only 6% of the people
admitted to the hospital were so sick as to need intensive
treatments. Of these 67 patients, 19 died (25%) and of these
67% had obvious underlying long-term medical illnesses. This
means that only 6 patients out of tens of
millions of people in 24 states that were considered "healthy'before their infection, had died. Is this justification for
a mass vaccination campaign?

Of the 1082 hospitalized patients, 93% were
eventually discharged recovered and only 7%
died, a very low death rate. Their analysis of these cases
concluded that those who died fell in three categories:

They were older patients

Antiviral medications were started 48 hours after the
onset of the illness

There was no correlation to having had seasonal vaccines

The last item is especially interesting because they assume
that having had seasonal flu vaccine would have offered some
protection -- it offered none.

What they did find was that none who died had been given
antiviral medications (Tamiflu or Relenza) within 48 hours
of getting sick. Those given the antiviral medications within
the golden 48-hour period rarely died. Relenza is far safer
than Tamiflu. This was the only factor found to correlate
with survival of severely ill ICU patients.

What about
the Danger to Pregnant Women? The American Experience

Our media is inundating the public with scare stories of
the danger this virus poses to pregnant women. Most of us
visualize the pregnant woman as being healthy, young and without
underlying medical diseases. The study is quite revealing,
but omits some very important factors.

We are told that pregnant women are 6x more
likely to end up in the hospital than the general population.
This figure is derived from the fact that it was estimated
that pregnant women had a 7% greater chance
of requiring hospital admission than did the general public
at 1% (Even this is a far higher number than
their own studies indicate -- actually it is a very small
fraction of 1%).

Dr. Michael Bronze, a professor of internal medicine at the
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, writing for
emedicine medscape.com (WebMD), states that the risk of a
pregnant women being hospitalized with the H1N1 infection
is 0.32 per 100,000 pregnant women (which is 1 in 300,000
pregnant women).17 One can safely say, based on
the Australian/New Zealand experience (at the peak of their
flu season) and the American data somewhere in the middle
of their flu season, that pregnant women have about a 99.97%
chance they will not become so sick as to require hospital
care at any level.

The death rate of pregnant women who were admitted to the
ICU was 7.7%, a fairly low figure for infectious
ICU patients. Remember, most patients admitted to the hospital
are admitted for hydration and are not that ill in terms of
the infection itself.

Smoking and
Obesity Increase Risk of H1N!

Now, most of us assume that these pregnant women are perfectly
healthy as mentioned above, but the data shows something quite
different. They found that greater than 30%
of the pregnant women were either obese or morbidly obese,
as did the Australian/New Zealand study. Of these, 60%
had underlying medical conditions that put them at greater
risk of overwhelming infections -- both viral and bacterial.

It is unfortunate that they did not enter any information
on smoking, either by the mother or by anyone living in the
household. It is known that smoking greatly increases ones
risk of severe complications from any flu virus.18,19
This is for several reasons. One, smokers eat a much poorer
diet than non-smokers.

Second, smoking destroys the cilia in the bronchial passageways
that are essential for clearing mucus and debris -- thus increasing
the risk of developing pneumonia.20 Finally, nicotine
is a very powerful immune suppressant.21 The combined
effect of all three is enough to land anyone in the ICU during
even a mild flu season. Likewise, chronic smokers have low
magnesium levels, which increase their risk of developing
bronchiospasm that is resistant to normal drug treatments.22-24

They also failed to record possible illegal drug use, how
many were living at poverty levels and how many were on prescription
drugs known to suppress immunity or deplete nutrients essential
for immune function. And, one must keep in mind, at this age,
(age range of 15 to 39 years) many would have had numerous
childhood vaccines and booster vaccines.

This was also not considered for obvious reasons. So, some
critical information we all need to evaluate this "pandemic'is being excluded or purposely kept from us.

Bacterial Pneumonia
and Swine Flu

The American study found that of the people admitted to the
hospital, 40% were found to have X-ray evidence
of pneumonia. Of these, 66% had pre-existing
medical conditions, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD), immunosuppression for transplants or cancer
or neurologic disorder.

We are not told how many were smokers or lived with smokers,
again, something that puts people at great risk of having
severe reactions to any infection. Smokers have much higher
bacterial pneumonia rates every year. The CDC estimates that
smokers have a 200% increased risk of flu
virus complications as compared to nonsmokers.

The CDC released in the September 29 issue of the MMWR an
analysis of the lung tissue from 77 fatal cases of H1N1 infection.25
Of these, 29% had a secondary bacterial infection
-- pneumonia. This is an important study because the media
and the CDC are telling adults they need to get a pneumococcal
vaccine and that parents need to have their children vaccinated
with the pneumococcal vaccine as well.

This adult study found that only half of
the pneumonias were due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, the organism
used in the vaccine. Half of the cases were due to other strains
of streptococcus, staphlococcus or H. Influenza. Some 18%
of the people had multiple organism cultured from their lungs.

It is important to note that they found that all
of these autopsied patients had previous, serious
medical problems prior to becoming infected with H1N1 variant
and that not all bacteria were examined, meaning that even
those with Strep pneumoniae could have had multiple infections,
for which the vaccines would have offered no protection.

Parents should also know that the vast majority of pneumonias
found in these infected children were not due to Strep pneumoniae,
but rather Staph aureus. Again, the pneumococcal
vaccine would have offered these children no protection.

Pregnant Women
Given Vaccine Have Babies with More Health Problems

It has always been a principle of medicine that one should
not vaccinate pregnant women, except in extreme cases, because
the risk to the baby is too high. Recently, we have seen two
examples of violation of this policy. When the HPV vaccine
Gardasil was first released the CDC and the
manufacturer (Merck Pharmaceutical Company) recommended that
it be given to pregnant women.

Shortly after beginning this dangerous practice it was ordered
halted because a number of women were losing their babies
and babies were being born with major malformations.26

It is known that stimulating a woman's immune system during
midterm and later term pregnancy significantly increases the
risk that her baby will develop autism during childhood and
schizophrenia sometime during the teenage years and afterward.27

Compelling scientific evidence also shows an increased risk
of seizures in the baby and later as an adult.28
In fact, a number of neurodevelopmental and behavioral problems
can occur in babies born to women immunologically stimulated
during pregnancy.29-32

It is true that serious flu infections or E. coli infections
during pregnancy are a major risk for all these complications,
but a woman's risk of becoming infected, as we have seen,
is a very small fraction of 1 %, yet they are calling for
all pregnant women to be vaccinated with
at least three vaccines, two of which contain mercury. There
is also evidence to show that a large number of these women
will gain no protection from the vaccine.

Dr. Bronze, quoted above, notes that animal studies have
shown that vaccines harm unborn babies and that no
safety studies have been done in humans. A recent
study done by Dr. Laura Hewitson, a professor of obstetrics
at the University of Pittsburg Medical Center, found that
a single vaccine used in human babies, when used in newborn
monkeys, caused significant abnormalities in brainstem development.33
This mass vaccination program for H1N1 variant virus will
be the largest experiment on pregnant women in history and
could end as a monumental disaster.

How Many Cases
are Really Swine Flu?

CBS, to their credit, conducted a three-month long investigation
that indicates that we have all been hoodwinked by the governmental
"protection'agency called euphemistically, the Center
for Disease Control and Prevention.34

What they tried to learn from the CDC was just what percentage
of the "flu cases'were in fact H1N1. The CDC did all
they could to protect this information and only after filing
a Freedom of Information request and waiting 2 months did
they finally release the data. Now we know why they wanted
it protected and why they stopped testing for the H1N1 virus
in late July.

The data revealed that in fact very few cases reported as
swine flu were in fact H1N1 variant virus. CBS examined the
data in all 50 states. What they found, for example, was that
in Georgia only 2% of reported cases were
H1N1 (97% negative for H1N1); in Alaska only 1%
of reported cases were H1N1 (93% negative for flu and 5% seasonal
flu) and in California only 2% of reported
cases were H1N1 with 12% being other flu viruses and 86% negative
for flu.

A recent release from the CDC found that their survey reported
that of 12,943 specimens tested from around the country, only
26.3% of cases tested positive for H1N1 variant
virus, but that 99.8% of the specimens tested
positive for some type of other flu virus, most of which were
regular seasonal flu.

The CDC has now changed all data reporting on the flu effects.
They did this by stopping viral typing and subtyping and rolled
back all previous numbers based on prior data. The new system
for collecting data now started on August 30th,
2009.

The only reason I can imagine they did this is that the prior
data was clearly demonstrating that the H1N1 variant virus
was causing a very mild illness in most people (99.99%) with
fewer hospitalizations, fewer cases of pneumonia and fewer
deaths for all ages and groups than the prior seasonal flu
in past years. This was true for the United States and the
Southern Hemisphere, which has gone though the worst of its
flu season.

Now that they are no longer typing the virus, they can attribute
all cases of pneumonia, hospitalizations and deaths to H1N1,
even though the majority of cases appear to be from a long
list of other causes. In fact, they can classify many cases
of primary pneumonia as caused by H1N1.

Actually LESS
Flu Deaths this Year

One must always keep in mind that the CDC has told us that
36,000 people die every year from influenza
and influenza-related complications. Thus far, we have seen
(accepting their data) about 900 deaths and
21,829 cases of pneumonia.

This is far below the 36,000 figure. In fact, perhaps we
should be breathing a sigh of relief that 35,000 fewer
people have died this year from flu-related disorders.
This would go down on record as the fewest flu-related deaths
in recorded history.

In fact, worldwide, according to CDC and WHO data, far fewer
people have died form H1N1 than any seasonal flu in the past.
This graph
from the CDC showing the "Pneumonia and Influenza Mortality
for 122 US Cities" also show that, so far, this year's flu
mortality is far below that of 2008.

In fact, worldwide, according to CDC and WHO data, far fewer
people have died form H1N1 than any seasonal flu in the past.
So, one must ask, why is the government and their handmaidens,
the media, fueling this panic mentality? Why are we once again
talking about mandatory vaccination for every man woman and
child in the nation?

And I can assure you that soon we will hear an announcement
that the adjuvant MF-59 or ASO3 (squalene) will be needed
to save lives.

Now, if the CBS data forced from the files of the CDC is
correct, why are so many people dying from this flu? The answer
is that no greater number are dying now, for any age group,
sex or state of pregnancy than have died in any previous flu
outbreak.

By statistical slight of hand they have created this pandemic
and continue to do so. One cannot foretell the future, but
based on the data now available from the United States, Canada,
Europe and the Southern hemisphere, there is no justification
for the fear mongering by the media and government agencies.

It is accepted that the cognitive portions of the human brain
work less well under two conditions -- fear and anger.
Those who have survived deadly situations or who make their
living surviving such situations tell us that controlling
our fear is the most important thing in survival. More people
have died from making poor decisions while overwhelmed by
fear than have died as a result of the situation itself.

I am reminded of the poor elderly person who died several
years back waiting in a very long line for a flu vaccine in
the sweltering heat. It seems she passed out and struck her
head on the hard asphalt.

She was standing in that line for hours because the CDC announced
that that year's flu was going to be especially deadly for
the elderly and there was a shortage of vaccine. As it turned
out, that year they picked the wrong virus to make the vaccine
-- so it was not only a dangerous vaccine, it would have given
her no protection. But then, the vaccine manufactures got
their blood money.

What Do They
Not Know About This Vaccine?

Insurance companies in Australia would not insure doctors
who gave the vaccine because it was a fast tracked vaccine
and therefore experimental. They felt that the danger of complications
was far too high to risk insuring the doctors. Unlike doctors
in America, they did not have a special law that Congress
would pass to insulate them from liability should severe complications
arise from the vaccine.

It is also of special interest to note that tens of millions
of babies were vaccinated with the Hepatitis B vaccine (providing
no protection to the babies) only to learn later that it is
linked to a 310% increased risk of developing
multiple sclerosis.36 One has to ask -- What
else do they not know about this vaccine?

Well, it turns out a lot.

Years after it was added to the recommended vaccine schedule,
it was linked to a terrifying disorder called macrophagic
myofascitis, which in children is associated with
a severe dementia-like illness.

Then we have the case of the Gardasil vaccine.
Millions of young girls were vaccinated and within several
months pregnant women were losing their babies, babies were
being born deformed, several of these very young girls died
and a growing number have had serious reactions to the vaccine.
Once again we have to ask -- What else do they not
know about this vaccine?

Vaccine Safety
Testing Only Done for ONE Week

Now we are being told that this new fast tracked, poorly
tested vaccine is very safe and effective. The results of
the testing on this vaccine were reported in the New England
Journal of Medicine.39 It is instructive to
learn that the tests for safety and to assess complications
lasted only 7 days after the vaccine, an
incredibly short period of follow-up. Gullian Barre
paralysis can occur even months after a vaccine as
can seizures, behavioral problems and neurodevelopmental disorders
in children.

It is interesting to note that the authors of the safety
study for our swine flu vaccine were all employees
of the maker of the vaccine CSL Biotherapeutics and
eight held equity interest in the company.39 This
admission is part of the disclosure policy of the New
England Journal of Medicine.

It is always important to keep in mind when you hear about
this vaccine being safe and produced just like the seasonal
flu vaccine -- What else do they not know about this
vaccine that they will discover months, years or even decades
later. Once injected with the vaccine and you develop
a complication there will be little that can be done to treat
the life-long degenerative disorder it produces. You will
just be a sad story on 60 minutes.

Dr. Blaylock is a board certified neurosurgeon, author
and lecturer. For the past 25 years he has practiced neurosurgery
in addition to having a nutritional practice. He recently
retired from both practices to devote full time to nutritional
studies and research.

Dr. Blaylock has written and illustrated three books.
The first book was on the subject of excitotoxins, Excitotoxins:
The Taste That Kills,and how they
are related to diseases of the nervous system.

His second book, Health and Nutrition Secrets That Can
Save Your Life, covers the common basis of all diseases, nutritional
protection against diseases of aging, protection against heavy
metal toxicity, the fluoride debate, pesticide and herbicide
toxicity, excitotoxin update, the vaccine controversy, protection
against heart attacks and strokes.

His third book, Natural Strategies for Cancer Patients,
was released in April, 2003 and discusses the ways to defeat
cancer, enhance the effectiveness of conventional treatments
and prevent complications associated with these treatments.

In addition, he has written and illustrated three chapters
in medical textbooks, written a booklet on nutritional protection
against biological terrorism and written and illustrated a
booklet on multiple sclerosis. He has written over 30 scientific
papers in peer-reviewed journals on a number of subjects.

Since the publication of his first book he has been a guest
on numerous national and international syndicated radio programs.

You
Can Make a Difference

Most
polls show that we ARE making a difference because more people
are becoming educated about influenza and flu vaccines, especially
H1N1 swine flu. Recent national polls have revealed that 30
to 50% in many communities are not planning to get a swine
flu shot. Those who haven't made up their minds yet have lots
of questions. So we have created some
posters that you can print and post ALL over your community,
your local stores, office and schools.