>3/ I'm affraid this also means that you can't have any kind of dependencies
>between instances, which is a must IMHO.
>
>Is this correct ?
There is still the attribute model as part of the binding attributes.
<model id="m1">
<instance>...
<model id="m2">
<instance>...
<input model="m1" ref="a/b/c">...
<input model="m2" ref="d/e/f">...
Additionally, any bind element (on any model) can contain an id, which is
then referenced by
<input bind="bind1">...
So the question of cross-model computational dependencies still applies!
.micah