The Evo-atheists can’t stand the FACT that their big hero was a nobody who was an academic failure. He was a pathetic dabbler in a sea of professionals. He was simply out of his league. He was pontificating on botany and geology and natural history, but was studying theology, which he couldn’t even get right. The man with no scientific training whatsoever is the “scientist” we are supposed to worship? Sounds more like L Ron Hubbard than Isaac Newton. lol

^^^
Er, well, it's more accurate to say that Charles Darwin came up with a better explanation for the origin of species than a tribe of bronze age desert nomads making up bedtime stories around a campfire did.

One of the greatest evolutionary theorists was also a nazi. I don't worship him, I just find his work on things like the golden ratio useful. In the same way, it would be foolish to reject the work the nazis carried out on treatment of diabetes, even though I disagree with their politics. The muslims invented algebra. I think Islam is the world's most totalitarian religion, but algebra is great.

Here's a pseudu-philosophical conundrum that might be just be relevant

The Nazis used huge amounts of X -ray radiation to shoot animated footage of the knee-joint in action from various angles. The radiation used killed the subjects

Does that mean we should reject their evidence of how the knee works?

Obviously not.

In the same way, whether Darwin was a Christian or not makes absolutely no difference as to what he discovered. It is a fact that evolution exists, and that a slightly modified version of Darwin's theory accounts for it. After all, no-one knew of DNA in Darwin's day.

The fundo-cretinists can't STAND the FACT that Darwin was an accomplished scientist for example he won an award for his work in geology just before On the Origin of Species was published, while all ToGodBeTheStory can do is potificate on goddidditt, and he even fails at that. He fails so hard I lol.

You do know he invented the science of biology since prior to him there were no biologists...

And he was an entomologist. Specifically a Coleopterist since he was interested in beetles.

Before that there was no biology. There was natural history which basically catalogued animals. After him biology began to understand what it was doing. He is like Newton. Cause Newton invented Physics. Likewise like Lavoisier since Laviosier started the catalogue of chemistry prior to which there was only "alchemy".