OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) intervention achieved with dopamine and norepinephrine after severe head injury. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, trial. SETTING: Neurosciences critical care unit. PATIENTS: Eleven patients with a head injury, requiring dopamine or norepinephrine infusions to support CPP. INTERVENTION: Cerebral tissue gas measurements were recorded using a multimodal sensor, and regional chemistry was assessed using microdialysis. Patients received in, randomised order, either dopamine or norepinephrine to achieve and maintain a CPP of 65 mmHg, and then, following a 30-min period of stable haemodynamics, a CPP of 85 mmHg. Data were then acquired using the second agent. Haemodynamic measurements and measurements of cerebral physiology were made during each period. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The CPP augmentation with norepinephrine, but not with dopamine, resulted in a significant reduction in arterial-venous oxygen difference (37+/-11 vs 33+/-12 ml/l) and a significant increase in brain tissue oxygen (2.6+/-1.1 vs 3.0+/-1.1 kPa). The CPP intervention did not significantly affect intracranial pressure. There were no significant differences between norepinephrine and dopamine on cerebral oxygenation or metabolism either at baseline or following a CPP intervention; however, the response to a CPP intervention with dopamine seemed to be more variable than the response achieved with norepinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: If CPP is to be raised to a level higher than 65-70 mmHg, then it is important to recognise that the response to the intervention may be unpredictable and that the vasoactive agent used may be of importance.