Not all nudity is related to sex. Therefore, should nudity of a non-sexual nature such as documentaries about the nudist lifestyle, or the nude in arts or in health documentaries be given a G or PG rating?

Children are not harmed by seeing other human beings nude. This has been proved correct in several non-Anglicised cultures such as in Europe, Africa, South America and some island cultures and societies.

Should America therefore get up to date with these cultures and relax the censorship laws on nudity as long as it is not depicted in a sexual or pornographic context?

The real question is if allowing kids to view media that contains nudity of any kind has a benefit for the child, because unless these laws are somehow hurting or stifling the growth and development of children does this really need to be addressed?

He is saying, according to how the title is worded, that he thinks it should be given a Gun or PG rating (as opposed to an Return rating, for example.) Whether or not that's what he means that is indisputably what he is saying.

Just don't accept badly worded proposals in general. If they can't be bothered to use the English language properly in the title they are unlikely to provide an interesting conversation.