The Tao of Anarchy: There is no God. There is no State. They are all superstitions that are established by the power-hunger psychopaths to divide, rule, and enslave us. It's only you and me, we are all true and real existence though in one short life. That is, We all are capable to freely interact with one another without coercion from anyone. We all are capable to take self-responsibility to find ways to live with one another in liberty, equality, harmony, and happiness before leaving this world forever. We all were born free and equal among all beings on this planet. We are not imprisoned in and by a place with a political name just because we were born there by chance. We are not chained to a set of indoctrinated beliefs that have been imposed upon us by so-called traditions. This Planet is home to all of us. No one owns it. We share the benefits from and responsibility to this Earth. We pledge no oath, no allegiance to no one; submit to no authority. We are all free and equal. The only obligation we all must undertake constantly with consistency is to respect the same freedoms and rights of others.

International Appeal: There are 26,740 signatories as of December 4, 2018

We the undersigned scientists, doctors, environmental
organizations and citizens from (__) countries, urgently call for a halt
to the deployment of the 5G (fifth generation) wireless network,
including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure
to radio frequency (RF) radiation on top of the 2G, 3G and 4G networks
for telecommunications already in place. RF radiation has been proven
harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes
an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a
crime under international law.

Executive summary

Telecommunications companies worldwide, with the support of
governments, are poised within the next two years to roll out the
fifth-generation wireless network (5G). This is set to deliver what is
acknowledged to be unprecedented societal change on a global scale. We
will have “smart” homes, “smart” businesses, “smart” highways, “smart”
cities and self-driving cars. Virtually everything we own and buy, from
refrigerators and washing machines to milk cartons, hairbrushes and
infants’ diapers, will contain antennas and microchips and will be
connected wirelessly to the Internet. Every person on Earth will have
instant access to super-high-speed, low- latency wireless communications
from any point on the planet, even in rainforests, mid-ocean and the
Antarctic.

What is not widely acknowledged is that this will also result in
unprecedented environmental change on a global scale. The planned
density of radio frequency transmitters is impossible to envisage. In
addition to millions of new 5G base stations on Earth and 20,000 new
satellites in space, 200 billion transmitting objects, according to
estimates, will be part of the Internet of Things by 2020, and one
trillion objects a few years later. Commercial 5G at lower frequencies
and slower speeds was deployed in Qatar, Finland and Estonia in
mid-2018. The rollout of 5G at extremely high (millimetre wave)
frequencies is planned to begin at the end of 2018.

Despite widespread denial, the evidence that radio frequency
(RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming. The
accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings,
experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ systems
in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemiological evidence
that the major diseases of modern civilization—cancer, heart disease and
diabetes—are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a
literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.

If the telecommunications industry’s plans for 5G come to fruition, no
person, no animal, no bird, no insect and no plant on Earth will be
able to avoid exposure, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to levels of RF
radiation that are tens to hundreds of times greater than what exists
today, without any possibility of escape anywhere on the
planet. These 5G plans threaten to provoke serious, irreversible effects
on humans and permanent damage to all of the Earth’s ecosystems.

Immediate measures must be taken to protect humanity and the
environment, in accordance with ethical imperatives and international
agreements.

5G will result in a massive increase in inescapable, involuntary exposure to wireless radiation

Ground-based 5G

In order to transmit the
enormous amounts of data required for the Internet of Things (IoT), 5G
technology, when fully deployed, will use millimetre waves, which are
poorly transmitted through solid material. This will require every
carrier to install base stations every 100 metres[1]
in every urban area in the world. Unlike previous generations of
wireless technology, in which a single antenna broadcasts over a wide
area, 5G base stations and 5G devices will have multiple antennas arranged in “phased arrays”[2],[3] that work together to emit focused, steerable, laser-like beams that track each other.

Each 5G phone will contain dozens of
tiny antennas, all working together to track and aim a narrowly focused
beam at the nearest cell tower. The US Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) has adopted rules[4]permitting
the effective power of those beams to be as much as 20 watts, ten times
more powerful than the levels permitted for current phones.

Each 5G base station will contain
hundreds or thousands of antennas aiming multiple laser-like beams
simultaneously at all cell phones and user devices in its service area.
This technology is called “multiple input multiple output” or MIMO. FCC
rules permit the effective radiated power of a 5G base station’s beams to be as much as 30,000 watts per 100 MHz of spectrum,[2]
or equivalently 300,000 watts per GHz of spectrum, tens to hundreds of
times more powerful than the levels permitted for current base stations.

Space-based 5G

At least five companies[5]
are proposing to provide 5G from space from a combined 20,000 satellites
in low- and medium-Earth orbit that will blanket the Earth with
powerful, focused, steerable beams. Each satellite will emit millimetre
waves with an effective radiated power of up to 5 million watts[6]
from thousands of antennas arranged in a phased array. Although the
energy reaching the ground from satellites will be less than that from
ground-based antennas, it will irradiate areas of the Earth not reached
by other transmitters and will be additional to ground-based 5G
transmissions from billions of IoT objects. Even more importantly, the
satellites will be located in the Earth’s magnetosphere, which exerts a
significant influence over the electrical properties of the atmosphere. The
alteration of the Earth’s electromagnetic environment may be an even
greater threat to life than the radiation from ground-based antennas
(see below).

Harmful effects of radio frequency radiation are already proven

Even before 5G was proposed, dozens of petitions and appeals[7] by international scientists, including the Freiburger Appeal
signed by over 3,000 physicians, called for a halt to the expansion of
wireless technology and a moratorium on new base stations.[8]

In 2015, 215 scientists from 41 countries communicated their alarm to the United Nations (UN) and World Health Organization (WHO).[9]
They stated that “numerous recent scientific publications have shown
that EMF [electromagnetic fields] affects living organisms at levels
well below most international and national guidelines”. More than 10,000
peer-reviewed scientific studies demonstrate harm to human health from
RF radiation.[10][11] Effects include:

The WHO’s International
Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded in 2011 that RF radiation
of frequencies 30 kHz – 300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).[49] However, recent evidence, including the latest studies on cell phone use and brain cancer risks, indicate that RF radiation is proven carcinogenic to humans[50] and should now be classified as a “Group 1 carcinogen” along with tobacco smoke and asbestos.

Most contemporary wireless
signals are pulse-modulated. Harm is caused by both the high-frequency
carrier wave and the low-frequency pulsations.[51]

The deployment of 5G satellites must be prohibited

The Earth, the ionosphere and the lower atmosphere form the global electric circuit[52] in which we live. It is well established that biological rhythms—of humans,[53][54] birds,[55] hamsters,[56] and spiders[57][58]—are
controlled by the Earth’s natural electromagnetic environment and that
the well-being of all organisms depends on the stability of this
environment, including the electrical properties of the atmosphere.[59][60][61][62]Cherry, in a groundbreaking paper, [63] explained the importance of the Schumann resonances[64]
and why ionospheric disturbances can alter blood pressure and melatonin
and cause “cancer, reproductive, cardiac and neurological disease and
death”.

These elements of our electromagnetic environment have already been altered by radiation from power lines. Power line harmonic radiation[65]reaches the Earth’s ionosphere and magnetosphere, where it is amplified by wave-particle interactions.[66][67]
In 1985, Dr. Robert O. Becker warned that power line harmonic radiation
had already changed the structure of the magnetosphere, and that the
continued expansion of this effect “threatens the viability of all life
on Earth”.[68] The placement
of tens of thousands of satellites directly in both the ionosphere and
magnetosphere, emitting modulated signals at millions of watts and
millions of frequencies, is likely to alter our electromagnetic
environment beyond our ability to adapt.[69]

Informal monitoring
has already provided evidence indicating serious effects on humans and
animals from the approximately 100 satellites that have provided 2G and
3G phone service from low orbit since 1998. Such effects cannot be
understood only from consideration of the low levels of radiation on the
ground. Knowledge from other relevant scientific disciplines must be
taken into account, including the fields of atmospheric physics and
acupuncture.[70][71][72][73] Adding 20,000 5G satellites will further pollute the global electric circuit[74][75] and could alter the Schumann resonances,[76] with which all life on Earth has evolved. The effects will be universal and may be profoundly damaging.

5G is qualitatively and quantitatively different from 4G

The idea that we will tolerate tens to hundreds of times more radiation at millimetre wavelengths is based on faulty modelling of the human body as a shell filled with a homogeneous liquid.[77][78] The assumption that millimetre waves do not penetrate beyond the skin completely ignores nerves,[79] blood vessels[80][81] and other electrically conducting structures that can carry radiation-induced currents deep into the body.[82][83][84]
Another, potentially more serious error is that phased arrays are not
ordinary antennas. When an ordinary electromagnetic field enters the
body, it causes charges to move and currents to flow. But when extremely
short electromagnetic pulses enter the body, something else happens:
the moving charges themselves become little antennas that reradiate the
electromagnetic field and send it deeper into the body. These reradiated
waves are called Brillouin precursors.[85] They become significant when either the power or the phase of the waves changes rapidly enough.[86] 5G will probably satisfy both criteria.

In addition, shallow
penetration in itself poses a unique danger to eyes and to the largest
organ of the body, the skin, as well as to very small creatures.
Peer-reviewed studies have recently been published, predicting thermal skin burns[87] in humans from 5G radiation and resonant absorption by insects,[88]
which absorb up to 100 times as much radiation at millimetre
wavelengths as they do at wavelengths presently in use. Since
populations of flying insects have declined by 75-80 per cent since 1989 even in protected nature areas,[89] 5G radiation could have catastrophic effects on insect populations worldwide. A 1986 study by Om Gandhi
warned that millimetre waves are strongly absorbed by the cornea of the
eye, and that ordinary clothing, being of millimetre-size thickness,
increases the absorption of energy by the skin by a resonance-type
effect.[90]Russell (2018) reviews the known effects of millimetre waves on skin, eyes (including cataracts), heart rate, immune system and DNA.[91]

Regulators have deliberately excluded the scientific evidence of harm

Stakeholders thus far in
the development of 5G have been industry and governments, while renowned
international EMF scientists who have documented biological effects on
humans, animals, insects and plants, and alarming effects on health and
the environment in thousands of peer-reviewed studies have been
excluded. The reason for the current inadequate safety guidelines is
that conflicts of interest
of standard-setting bodies “due to their relationships with
telecommunications or electric companies undermine the impartiality that
should govern the regulation of Public Exposure Standards for
non-ionizing radiation”. [92]Professor
Emeritus Martin L. Pall lays out the conflicts of interest in detail,
and the lists of important studies that have been excluded, in his literature review. [93]

The thermal hypothesis is obsolete—new safety standards are needed

Current safety guidelines are based on the obsolete hypothesis that heating is the only harmful effect of EMFs. As Markov and Grigoriev have stated, “Today standards do not consider the real pollution of the environment with nonionizing radiation”.[94]
Hundreds of scientists, including many signatories to this appeal, have
proven that many different kinds of acute and chronic illnesses and
injuries are caused without heating (“non-thermal effect”) from radiation levels far below international guidelines.9
Biological effects occur even at near-zero power levels. Effects that
have been found at 0.02 picowatts (trillionths of a watt) per square
centimetre or less include altered genetic structure in E. coli[95]and in rats,[96]altered EEG in humans,[97]growth stimulation in bean plants,[98] and stimulation of ovulation in chickens.[99]

To protect against
non-thermal effects, duration of exposure must be considered. 5G will
expose everyone to many more transmissions simultaneously and
continuously, day and night without cessation. New safety standards are
needed and should be based on cumulative exposureand not only on power levels
but also on frequency, bandwidth, modulation, waveform, pulse width and
other properties that are biologically important. Antennas must be
confined to specific, publicly identified locations. To protect humans,
antennas must be located far from where people live and work, and
excluded from the public rights-of-way where people walk. To protect
wildlife, they must be excluded from wilderness sanctuaries and strictly
minimized in remote areas of the Earth. To protect all life, commercial
communications satellites must be limited in number and prohibited in
low- and medium-Earth orbits. Phased arrays must be prohibited on Earth
and in space.

RF radiation has both acute and chronic effects

RF radiation has both immediate and long-term effects. Cancer and heart disease are examples of long-term effects. Alteration of heart rhythm[100]and changes in brain function (EEG)[101] are examples of immediate effects. A syndrome that was called radiowave sickness[102] in the former Soviet Union and is called electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) around the world today[103] can be either acute or chronic. Professor Dr. Karl Hecht has published a detailed history
of these syndromes, compiled from a review of more than 1,500 Russian
scientific papers and the clinical histories of more than 1,000 of his
own patients in Germany. Objective findings include sleep disorders,
abnormal blood pressure and heart rate, digestive disorders, hair loss,
tinnitus and skin rash. Subjective symptoms include dizziness, nausea,
headache, memory loss, inability to concentrate, fatigue, flu-like
symptoms and cardiac pain. [104]

The EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016
states that EHS develops when people are “continuously exposed in their
daily life” to increasing levels of EMFs, and that “reduction and
prevention of EMF exposure” is necessary to restore these patients to
health.[105] EHS should no
longer be considered a disease, but an injury by a toxic environment
that affects an increasingly large portion of the population, estimated
already at 100 million people worldwide,[106][107] and that may soon affect everyone[108] if the worldwide rollout of 5G is permitted.

The International Scientific Declaration on EHS and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), Brussels, declared in 2015 that “[i]naction is a cost to society and is not an option any more… [W]e unanimously acknowledge this serious hazard to public health… [urgently requiring] that major primary prevention measures are adopted and prioritized, to face this worldwide pan-epidemic in perspective” (emphasis added).[109]

World governments are failing in their duty of care to the populations they govern

In their haste to
implement 5G and to encourage the unconstrained use of outer space, the
European Union, United States and national governments worldwide are
taking steps to ensure a “barrier-free” regulatory environment.[110] They are prohibiting local authorities from enforcing environmental laws,[111]
and “in the interest of speedy and cost-effective deployment”, removing
“unnecessary burdens… such as local planning procedures [and] the
variety of specific limits on electromagnetic field (EMF) emissions and
of the methods required to aggregate them”.[112]

Governments are also enacting laws to make wireless facilities a permitted use in all public rights-of-way.[113]
To date, most wireless facilities have been located on private property
at some distance from homes and businesses. In order for them to be
spaced less than 100 metres apart as required by 5G, however, they will
now be located on the sidewalk directly in front of homes and businesses
and close above the heads of pedestrians, including mothers with
babies.

Public notice requirements
and public hearings are being eliminated. Even if there were a hearing
and 100 scientific experts were to testify against 5G, laws have been passed making it illegal
for local authorities to take their testimony into consideration. US
law, for example, prohibits local governments from regulating wireless
technology “on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency
radiation”,[114] and courts
have reversed regulatory decisions about cell tower placement simply
because most of the public testimony was about health.[115] Insurers will not provide coverage against EMF risks,[116]
and there is zero clarity as to what entity will bear legal
responsibility for damage to life, limb and property arising from
exposure to 5G, whether ground- or space-based.[117]

In the absence of an agreed comprehensive legal regime governing
activities in outer space, legal liability for those activities is
non-existent, despite the prospect of whole continents, the atmosphere
and the oceans being put at risk by them.

International agreements are being violated

Children and duty of care

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child:
States shall “undertake to ensure the child such protection and care as
is necessary for his or her well-being” (art. 3), “ensure… the survival
and development of the child” (art. 6) and “take appropriate measures
to combat disease… taking into consideration the dangers and risks of
environmental pollution” (art. 24(c)).

The Nuremberg Code (1949) applies
to all experiments on humans, thus including the deployment of 5G with
new, higher RF radiation exposure that has not been pre-market tested
for safety. “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely
essential” (art. 1). Exposure to 5G will be involuntary. “No experiment
should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that
death or disabling injury will occur” (art. 5). The findings of over
10,000 scientific studies and the voices of hundreds of international organizations
representing hundreds of thousands of members who have suffered
disabling injury and been displaced from their homes by already-existing
wireless telecommunications facilities, are “a priori reasons to
believe that death or disabling injury will occur”.

Duty to inform and EMFs

The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (2012) of
the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) stated that “[t]here is
a need to inform the public of the potential effects of exposure to
electromagnetic fields (EMFs)” and invited Member States “to adopt
suitable measures in order to ensure compliance with relevant
international recommendations to protect health against the adverse
effect of EMF”.

The Mid-term review of the European Environment and Health Action Plan 2004-2010
(2008): “The European Parliament… [n]otes that the limits on exposure
to electromagnetic fields which have been set for the general public are
obsolete, … obviously take no account of developments in information
and communication technologies, of the recommendations issued by the
European Environment Agency or of the stricter emission standards
adopted, for example, by Belgium, Italy and Austria, and do not address
the issue of vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women, newborn babies
and children.”

Resolution 1815 (Council of Europe, 2011):
“Take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic
fields, especially to radio frequencies from mobile phones, and
particularly the exposure to children and young people.”

The World Charter for Nature
(1982): “Activities which are likely to cause irreversible damage to
nature shall be avoided… [W]here potential adverse effects are not fully
understood, the activities should not proceed” (art. 11).

The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development
(1992): “States have… the responsibility to ensure that activities
within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the
environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national
jurisdiction” (principle 2).

The United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development
(2002): “There is an urgent need to… create more effective national and
regional policy responses to environmental threats to human health”
(para. 54(k)).

Albert Einstein famously asserted that “God does not play dice”.[118]
Yet by pursuing the broadcast on Earth and from space of 5G, an
unprecedented technology of millimetre waves previously used as an
energy weapon in military operations and crowd control,[119] world governments are recklessly playing dice with the future of life on Earth.

To refuse to accept and apply relevant and valid scientific knowledge
is ethically unacceptable. Existing research shows that 5G—and
especially space-based 5G—contravenes principles enshrined in a host of
international agreements.

We call upon the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe and governments of all nations,

(a) To take immediate
measures to halt the deployment of 5G on Earth and in space in order to
protect all humankind, especially the unborn, infants, children,
adolescents and pregnant women, as well as the environment;

(e) To appoint
immediately—without industry influence—international groups of
independent, truly impartial EMF and health scientists with no conflicts
of interest, [120] for the
purpose of establishing new international safety standards for RF
radiation that are not based only on power levels, that consider
cumulative exposure, and that protect against all health and environmental effects, not just thermal effects and not just effects on humans;

(f) To appoint
immediately—without industry influence—international groups of
scientists with expertise in EMFs, health, biology and atmospheric
physics, for the purpose of developing a comprehensive regulatory
framework that will ensure that the uses of outer space are safe for
humans and the environment, taking into account RF radiation, rocket
exhaust gases, black soot, and space debris and their impacts on ozone, [121]global warming, [122]
the atmosphere and the preservation of life on Earth. Not only
ground-based but also space-based technology must be sustainable [123] for adults and children, animals and plants.

Please respond to the Appeal Administrator listed below,

detailing the measures you intend to take to protect the global
population against RF radiation exposure, especially 5G radiation. This
appeal and your response will be publicly available on www.5gSpaceAppeal.org.

Annie Sasco, MD, DrPH, SM, HDR, former
Chief of Research Unit of Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention at the
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon; former Acting
Chief, Programme for Cancer Control of the World Health Organization
(WHO); former Director of Research at the Institut National de la Santé
et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM); FranceNORTH AMERICA

[9]
International appeal: scientists call for protection from non-ionizing
electromagnetic field exposure. International EMF Scientist Appeal
website. https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal. Published May 11, 2015. Accessed June 10, 2018. As of March 2018, 237 EMF scientists from 41 nations had signed the Appeal.

[11]
Sage C, Carpenter D., eds. Biolnitiative Report: A Rationale for a
Biologically-Based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic
Radiation. Sage Associates; 2012. www.bioinitiative.org.
Accessed June 10, 2018. The 1,470-page BioInitiative Report, authored
by an international group of 29 experts, has reviewed more than 1,800
new studies and is continually updated.

[78] Research on technology to evaluate compliance with RF protection guidelines. Electromagnetic Compatibility Laboratory, Tokyo. http://emc.nict.go.jp/bio/phantom/index_e.html.
Accessed July 18, 2018.“SAR is measured by filling phantom liquid that
has the same electrical properties as those of the human body in a
container made in the shape of the human body, and scanning the inside
using an SAR probe.”

[79]
Becker RO, Marino AA. Electromagnetism and Life. Albany: State
University of New York Press; 1982:39.“The evidence seems to be quite
conclusive that there are steady DC electric currents flowing outside of
the neurones proper in the entire nervous system.”

[83]
Devyatkov ND, Golant MB, Betskiy OV. Millimeter Waves and Their Role in
the Processes of Life. (Millimetrovye volny i ikh rol’ v protsessakh
zhiznedeyatel’nosti). Moscow: Radio i svyaz’ (Radio and Communication);
1991 (Russian).

[93]
Pall M. 5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and international health:
Compelling evidence for eight distinct types of great harm caused by
electromagnetic field (EMF) exposures and the mechanism that causes
them. European Academy for Environmental Medicine. http://www.5gappeal.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pall_2018.pdf. Published May 2018. Accessed June 22, 2018.

[114] Mobile services, 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iv). https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2016-title47/pdf/USCODE-2016-title47-chap5-subchapIII-partI-sec332.pdf:
“No state or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate
personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental
effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities
comply with the [Federal Communications] Commission’s regulations
concerning such emissions.” Courts have reversed regulatory decisions
about cell tower placement simply because most of the public testimony
was about health.

[117] Swiss Re: SONAR – New emerging risk insights. July 2014:22. http://media.swissre.com/documents/SONAR_2014.pdf.
Accessed June 10, 2018. “[A]n increasing level of interconnectivity and
the growing prevalence of digital steering and feedback systems also
give rise to new vulnerabilities. These could involve cascading effects
with multiple damages as well as long-lasting interruptions if the
problems turned out to be complex and/or difficult to repair.
Interconnectivity and permanent data generation give rise to concerns
about data privacy, and exposure to electromagnetic fields may also
increase.”

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole
responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on
Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect
statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization
grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community
internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged
together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For
publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms
including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca

www.globalresearch.ca
contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in
an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and
social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for
research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted
material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission
from the
copyright owner.