That law, technically, prevents Indiana from forcing businesses to serve customers based on religious objections to sexual orientation. This allows him the "wiggle room" to technically say that the law doesn't allow discrimination.

Of course, practically, the law allows discrimination. Anyone can see that. But as a politician it's all about leaving a way out if your opponents call you out, but technically doing something that wins favor with your suppporters. Which is exactly what happened.

He also later stated that he was "...not aware of cases cases and controversies." that this law was even made for.
It's just another example, in a shamefully long list, of bigotry to come from Pence.

Mike Pence once supported the use of federal funding to treat people "seeking to change their sexual behavior." However, Pence never stated that he supported the use of electric shocks or "gay conversion" therapy.

I disagree. Being a skeptic is healthy, but being a skeptic doesn't neccesarily mean you are right. He is a skeptic, not a denier. Ebell's argument is not against climate change, it is against climate change "alarmism" among scientific and political communities.

He states

There has been a little bit of warming ... but it’s been very modest and well within the range for natural variability, and whether it’s caused by human beings or not, it’s nothing to worry about.

These kinds of statements are fine, provided others use the time to educate not only the skeptic, but the public as well. Of course I disagree with Ebell's statement because we have plenty of evidence to the contrary. 12345678.