Is the game in good hands?Are the people at the top in "Australia" the best available?I looked at the site and its not very impressive, Just looks like a footnote on the NRL website.Nothing that is on that site inspires me that the game is in the best hands possible.

Is the game in good hands?Are the people at the top in "Australia" the best available?I looked at the site and its not very impressive, Just looks like a footnote on the NRL website.Nothing that is on that site inspires me that the game is in the best hands possible.

Is the game in good hands?Are the people at the top in "Australia" the best available?I looked at the site and its not very impressive, Just looks like a footnote on the NRL website.Nothing that is on that site inspires me that the game is in the best hands possible.

Not sure if this is a joke as it took many months to sort through all of the possibles and was under intense media scrutiny during the entire process... I seriously suggest you look at the bio's of the commissioners.

It is a footnote because the NRL site is yet to have the post-Commission redesign. It used to just be for the NRL and NRL U20's, now it's reporting on Kangaroos, Origin, and lower levels aswell. The NRL, QRL NSWRL and One Community sites will be getting redesigned this year as part of the online media deal with Telstra.

So far they've doubled every sponsor/media deal we previously had, sorted out the GC Titans (the CoE debt fiasco and the pathways between the Titans and the GCRL/GCJRL) and have made good changes to the SoO eligibility laws, the video ref and changed back the finals system to what the fans wanted.TBH the only thing people feel they've stuffed up is the shoulder charge banning.

Is the game in good hands?Are the people at the top in "Australia" the best available?I looked at the site and its not very impressive, Just looks like a footnote on the NRL website.Nothing that is on that site inspires me that the game is in the best hands possible.