Eventually? You'll be lucky if the iPad 4 comes with that. Touch screens and 3D screens do not go well, Nintendo said. It'll take more than a few years to get around that, I think, and we'll have already moved onto transparent glass tablets by then.

I suppose your one of those people that doesn't own a DS because you can play it on no$ at half the framerate with terrible controls?...Or one of the ones that so desperately want a Wii emulator on the ps3

Honestly whats the point? If a device can emulate the 3ds....its probably capable of producing far better games anyway...

I suppose your one of those people that doesn't own a DS because you can play it on no$ at half the framerate with terrible controls?...Or one of the ones that so desperately want a Wii emulator on the ps3

Honestly whats the point? If a device can emulate the 3ds....its probably capable of producing far better games anyway...

Click to expand...

Better in what aspect?

Xbox can emulate NES, but I find Contra to be far more enjoyable than Halo.

I suppose your one of those people that doesn't own a DS because you can play it on no$ at half the framerate with terrible controls?...Or one of the ones that so desperately want a Wii emulator on the ps3

Honestly whats the point? If a device can emulate the 3ds....its probably capable of producing far better games anyway...

Click to expand...

Better in what aspect?

Xbox can emulate NES, but I find Contra to be far more enjoyable than Halo.

Click to expand...

I mean its possible.....Nobody ever seems to do it though
Besides...its so much easier to buy the console.....like when people ask what computer is best to run a ps2 emulator....It would be so much simpler to just get a ps2...probably cheaper too

But I'm just ranting here....I guess I'm just tired of everyone wanting everything to emulate ever console ever created

Edit: never answered your question...I meant say...if someone wanted to recreate the contra experience on xbox....they could potentially pull it off much better

I suppose your one of those people that doesn't own a DS because you can play it on no$ at half the framerate with terrible controls?...Or one of the ones that so desperately want a Wii emulator on the ps3

Click to expand...

Well at least the Wii on PS3 makes sense, what with the Move. Still a dumb idea though.

Eventually? You'll be lucky if the iPad 4 comes with that. Touch screens and 3D screens do not go well, Nintendo said. It'll take more than a few years to get around that, I think, and we'll have already moved onto transparent glass tablets by then.

Nintendo says a lot of things, and you should take their words with a grain (or pound) of salt. There is no technical reason that would prevent a 3D touch screen. You should just avoid having people touch the screen while a 3D effect is being displayed, because a finger on the screen does to the 3D picture what sticking a Q-tip in your ear does to stereo sound.

Nintendo says a lot of things, and you should take their words with a grain (or pound) of salt. There is no technical reason that would prevent a 3D touch screen. You should just avoid having people touch the screen while a 3D effect is being displayed, because a finger on the screen does to the 3D picture what sticking a Q-tip in your ear does to stereo sound.

Click to expand...

While there is no technical reason they still don't go to well together, imagine trying to touch an object that's inside the screen but theres something in the way preventing you, just like a window.

Nintendo says a lot of things, and you should take their words with a grain (or pound) of salt. There is no technical reason that would prevent a 3D touch screen. You should just avoid having people touch the screen while a 3D effect is being displayed, because a finger on the screen does to the 3D picture what sticking a Q-tip in your ear does to stereo sound.

Click to expand...

While there is no technical reason they still don't go to well together, imagine trying to touch an object that's inside the screen but theres something in the way preventing you, just like a window.

Click to expand...

If it was optimized for touch screen then they wouldn't obstruct things you are supposed to press.

While there is no technical reason they still don't go to well together, imagine trying to touch an object that's inside the screen but theres something in the way preventing you, just like a window.

Quoted from Veho:

You should just avoid having people touch the screen while a 3D effect is being displayed And the way to do that is to never have a "touchable" 3D scene, i.e. never make the user touch the screen while it's displaying 3D. People might still try to touch a 3D object "inside" the screen, but that sort of people would also try to touch the little humans inside their TV.

I probably should have quoted his entire post, for context:

Quoted from Wintrale:

QUOTE(bandersnatch @ Jan 21 2011, 12:31 AM)

Click to expand...

i'm also expecting tablets with 3D eventually, so theres that.

Click to expand...

Eventually? You'll be lucky if the iPad 4 comes with that. Touch screens and 3D screens do not go well, Nintendo said. It'll take more than a few years to get around that

Nintendo says a lot of things, and you should take their words with a grain (or pound) of salt. There is no technical reason that would prevent a 3D touch screen. You should just avoid having people touch the screen while a 3D effect is being displayed, because a finger on the screen does to the 3D picture what sticking a Q-tip in your ear does to stereo sound.

Click to expand...

While there is no technical reason they still don't go to well together, imagine trying to touch an object that's inside the screen but theres something in the way preventing you, just like a window.

Click to expand...

If it was optimized for touch screen then they wouldn't obstruct things you are supposed to press.

Click to expand...

yyeah but it would still give the illusion that you would have to find a way around it. say if they combined that with the camera for example, and lets just say for arguments sake there's a window in your way, like Eerpow said, and you have to make some sort of motion to remove it from your path in order to touch the object. It's a perfect Layton scenario. And it optimizes more than just the 3D and Touch Screen effects. Plus, it makes sense! (at least from my perspective anyway...)