Sun Sign Astrology - The Elephant in the Room

by Jessica Adams

My name is Jessica Adams. I am a Sun Sign horoscope
columnist and I work in a branch of astrology which is the elephant in
the room.

Everyone in our profession knows it's there. Everyone knows it's
noisy and enormous. Yet after nearly 90 years of its popular existence,
nobody in our profession seems to know what to do with it. Sun Sign work
continues to be treated like Babar banging around in the bathroom. And
nobody wants to look.

Post-internet, Sun Sign astrology now draws verified audiences in
the multi-millions. It is the most trusted kind of horoscope in the
world. As Newsweek reported in 2013, Susan Miller's website
astrologyzone.com draws six million visitors annually.

I can give you even more specific numbers for my own website, to
give you an idea of just how big the Sun Sign elephant in the room
actually is.

WordPress and Google Analytics statistics reveal
jessicaadams.com drew 1,008,875 people in the last 12 months, and those
people visited my daily, weekly and monthly horoscopes 6,526,583 times.
They came mostly from America, followed by Australia and Britain.

Despite these kinds of numbers, at the 2012 United Astrology
Conference (UAC) Sun Signs were given just one day in the programme, for
"astrological beginners" on "entry-level topics."

Entry level? I currently work with 34 symbols in the horoscope
when I make predictions in my columns for Harper's Bazaar, Cosmopolitan
and others.

These horoscope symbols include Psyche, Cupid, Juno, Diana,
Fortuna, Minerva and many more Roman archetypes who complete the family
tree of astrology that began with Mercury, Venus and Mars.

They are, of course, asteroids. I began researching these gods and
goddesses when I completed my university degree, majoring in Philosophy,
Ancient Civilisations and Religious Studies.

Whatever the UAC organisers might think, Sun Sign astrology is not
entry level, and it's not for beginners. When I approached them to speak
at their 2008 conference, though, I was turned down. There goes the
elephant.

When astrologers reject Sun Sign astrology

After being rejected to speak at UAC (despite just having
published two astrology books in America with HarperCollins and Penguin)
I was also turned down to speak at the Astrological Association
conference in 2014. This time I sent an annoyed e-mail to the
organisers.

Wow, what does it take to be invited to speak at an AA conference
these days? 50,000 daily website visitors? 2000 Twitter followers? I
guess I'm just irrelevant to people who like astrology. Will organise my
own talks.

Part of my frustration came from not being able to reach
astrologers, and astrology students, at conferences - exactly the kind of
people who I could talk to about training as Sun Sign columnists.

Fortunately, in the end, the AA changed their mind, and Sun Signs
went on the lecture schedule.

Thanks to developing publishing and internet technology, there is
a massive new Sun Sign astrology industry out there for all of us to work
in, just waiting to happen. The potential is there for some astrologers
to write websites which cater purely for one sign; purely for one
birthdate, even. The web pulls in such vast numbers that you could make a
decent income, merely catering for everyone born under the sign of Aries.
Or even one decanate of Aries.

Enhanced e-horoscopes, with embedded video and audio, may be the
future. Or how about interactive predictions? The potential is exciting.
And lucrative.

Needless to say, while Sun Sign work is the undiscussed elephant
in the room, we are never going to see that potential fulfilled.

How to Make a (Good) Living from Astrology

So how do the numbers in Sun Sign astrology work and why should
mainstream and academic astrology care? It begins with "freeconomics":
the internet principle that you give 90% of your work away, and charge
for the rest. And most of what people want, free, online is Sun
Sign-based - because it is what they know. Uncomplicated. Familiar. Their
grandparents and great-grandparents were raised on it too.

People always want to know how much money I make from my work.
Well, here's your chance to find out.

My website is mostly free, with premium content for subscribers,
and enough of those one million people sign up for a small sum to view
ring-fenced content every year, to ensure £10,000 in annual income. When
my personal 2014 client horoscopes are completed at Christmas, I will
have added £7,000 to that total.
My work for Harper's Bazaar, Cosmopolitan, the Australian Women's Weekly and
Get The Gloss adds well over £70,000 to that total.

So there it is. It is possible to earn over £70,000 a year from
astrology if you write Sun Sign columns. And that figure does not include
the royalties I receive from my books, Essential Astrology for Women
(HarperCollins) and Astrolove (Corgi). Personal appearance fees add to
the total, too. It all adds up.

Will the "real astrology" please stand up?

Inspired by a conversation with Kim Farnell, the author of
Flirting with the Zodiac, I began by looking at two phrases which often
turn up in criticism of Sun Sign astrology. Even by Sun Sign astrologers.

One is "real astrology" and the other is "serious astrology" -
and the usual implication is that Sun Sign horoscope columns are
neither.

Thanks to their columns and books, the astrologers most associated
with the phrase "real astrology" are Rob Brezsny and John Frawley.

Brezsny no longer uses the term; Frawley made his name with it. I don't
believe any such things exists. All astrology is real.

Neil Spencer, formerly the astrologer for The
Observer, comments:

I detest astrological snobbery, especially talk of 'Real'
astrology. Planetary cycles apart, there is nothing real about astrology;
western astrologers use a zodiac that doesn't even accord with 'real'
planetary positions. Astrology is symbolic, interpretative, allusive and
elusive. There are many techniques and I don't think one is better than
another. I admire horary, which I can't do, I admire sect, antiscion,
dashas and nakshatras, though I am no expert on them.

In fact, in the age of Neptune in Pisces, it may be time to accept
that there is nothing real about reality. Unless you are Richard Dawkins,
however (see his 2007 documentary, The Enemies of Reason). He firmly
believes that his reality is more real, than your reality.

This is from his website, richarddawkins.net, written by Mark
Crislip:

There are numerous activities that one human will offer another
in exchange for money that are completely divorced from reality.
Astrology. Total bunkum.

Ah, there's that reality word, again. And as with Dawkins,
Crislip's reality is apparently much more real than yours.

We will, however, always come to the R word, every time we look at
Sun Sign horoscopes, because the first column was published during a
planetary pile-up dominated by Neptune, that potent symbol of alternative
realities.

Nick Campion, himself an experienced Sun Sign astrologer, details
the story of the first modern UK newspaper astrology column in his book,
Astrology and Popular Religion in the Modern West. The first version of a
Sun Sign feature was published in the Sunday Express on 24 August 1930
and was written by R. H. Naylor, when Cheiro was unavailable.

Naylor was asked to analyse the horoscope of the infant Princess
Margaret, give general political predictions and about fifty words per
day of birthday predictions for each day of the coming week. The column
was not based on the 12-paragraph scheme (that came later) but it did
contain reader birthday predictions. Readers loved it. Popular,
mass-audience astrology for the media was up and running.

Sun Sign astrology - born under Neptune

The aspects for Naylor's first column at
6.00am in London on 24th August 1930 say it all. The Sun stands at 0
Virgo 18. The Moon is at 1 Virgo 07. Neptune is at 3 Virgo 12.

Sun Sign astrology, as we know it from 1930 onwards, in its
popular newspaper form, is Virgo, with all its fixation on minutiae and
daily routine, plus the distortion of Neptune.

A large part of this distortion comes from confusion over Sun Sign
cusps. Some years ago I addressed this in my Cosmopolitan magazine column
by making sure my agents at William Morris secured a contract which
stipulated readers would see a link to astro.com on the page, in order to
check their correct Sun Sign.

Not every magazine, newspaper or website will be sympathetic,
though, and so a large chunk of the many millions of people reading their
daily horoscope online and in the global media, will regularly be reading
the wrong sign as horoscope columnists average the ingress dates for
their readers.

The problem, of course, stems from the mass-market nature of the
beast. There just isn't enough space to explain why time, place and date
of birth matters. And so, Taureans go on thinking they are Geminis, and
Geminis go on thinking they are Cancerians.

Sun Sign Astrology as Divination

The cusp problem - so utterly Neptunian in every way - is similar
to the problem of "wrong data, accurate horoscope" which client-based
astrologers hit all the time (it is a common issue with American clients
and British astrologers who both read days and months in reversed order.
It also happens when ageing mothers simply cannot remember their adult
children's birth times correctly).

This way of thinking about astrology (wrong map, but correct
divination) comes from Geoffrey Cornelius and his book The Moment of
Astrology, and specifically an article called Is Astrology Divination and
Does It Matter? (published in the Mountain Astrologer in 1998).

Cornelius wrote, "The efficacy of astrology may not be
dependent on the right or wrong map, but on a process of the psyche by
which an astrologer mysteriously brings himself or herself into line with
the person and the material. Certainly there is enough evidence to at
least make us question whether the basis of correct understanding in
astrology is actually properly given by an objective moment of physical
time."

Neptune, again. But anything born on a triple conjunction of the
Sun, Moon and Neptune will always be a peculiar Poseidon Adventure.

Ghostwriters and Sun Sign columns

Here's another thing about the elephant in the room. It is often
not the elephant you imagine it to be. In other words, the column may
have been penned by a ghostwriter (a perfect definition of a triple
conjunction involving Neptune in Virgo). After all - what else is an
astrologer to do, except hire an invisible helping hand, when faced with
365 days of work a year, with no time for holidays or sick days?

The actor Robert Mitchum and his wife Dorothy Mitchum both worked
as ghostwriters for the astrologer Carroll Righter before Robert found
fame in Hollywood. There are many more examples. The astrologer Jonathan
Cainer escapes the problem by inviting (credited) guest horoscope
columnists to take over in his absence.

More often than the millions of astrology fans suspect, though,
they maybe reading a column which was never written by the astrologer
they trust, for a sign which is not even theirs.

For the record, I write every word that appears in my columns. One
of the reasons I want to teach Sun Sign astrology, is to train people to
join me, to share the workload from time to time. However - I will be the
first to admit that the elephant in the room is a very slippery Neptunian
creature indeed. And it's time we stared it down.

Sun Sign astrology education

Shelley von Strunckel is one of the most successful and respected
astrologers in the world. Her horoscope columns appear in The Sunday
Times and London Evening Standard, among other titles. She wrote to me,
in a recent e-mail: "I'd love to see – and would be happy to teach – a
section on writing Sun Sign astrology for the press in astrology courses.
That way those who have the talent, inclination – and discipline! – can
learn early on."

All of which raises the question of technique. Which house system?
Planets or asteroids? Orbs? And then there is the issue of writing style;
particular media or literary techniques.

Neil Spencer: "There are many techniques and I don't think one is
better than another. My favourite Sun Sign writer is Michael Lutin, (the
former Vanity Fair astrologer at michaellutin.com) I love his wit. I also
enjoy Victor Olliver, who writes for The Lady. "

Patric Walker and Horoscope Craft

The Sun Sign system I learned, purely by reading magazine columns
in Harpers and Queen written by the eminent 20th century astrologer
Patric Walker, is based on solar sign houses, or solar houses.

The Sun goes onto the ascendant position and whole-sign houses are
used. In this respect, the house system is rather similar to the one
popularised by Robert Hand. All things being equal.

The Walker system, as much as I could learn from his magazine work
in the 1980s and 1990s, was to use exact transiting aspects (for example,
Sun 1 Leo 00 conjunct Jupiter 1 Leo 00) and nothing wider than that.

Walker's technique worked superbly. If Prince Charles
(Scorpio) had heeded the advice in his Patric Walker column in Harpers
& Queen in June 1981, one month before his wedding and marriage to
Diana Spencer, he could have saved him from an expensive divorce over a
decade later. This is the original prediction, made for that month.

SCORPIO (24 October to 22 November)
Both personal finances and joint undertakings will demand the
utmost care this month, since the great Sun will be opposed by Neptune in
those angles of your solar horoscope. Try to cut down on your expenses
and above all take no chances, regardless of the opinions of others. You
now appear to be experiencing many dramatic changes in your personal
life…"

The clincher sentence? "Now you may have to take your problems to
someone more capable of handling matters of a legal nature."

Oh for a pre-nup, Prince Charles. But then again, it was Diana who
was the astrology fan. For the record, she also hired gifted Sun Sign
astrologers like my friend and colleague Debbie Frank to create her natal
chart.

Shelley von Strunckel sheds more light on Walker's approach to his
solar columns. She reveals:

He used solar houses and specific aspects
during the month or, in daily stars, on the day. If there were no
specific aspects on a day, he'd refer to the influence of the slow-moving
planets in the solar houses of that sign's chart. In the daily stars,
with the exception of the Full and New Moon and eclipses, he ignored
lunar aspects - as he said they didn't last long enough to be
recognisable in the readers' experience.

Astrology and democracy

I will leave the closing comments on Sun Sign astrology to Victor
Olliver, who is a bestselling Amazon author, as well as the
aforementioned columnist for The Lady, and has since become editor of The
Astrological Journal.

Victor Olliver: "Let's be democratic in our approach to astrology
and recognise its many expressions. Newspapers, magazines and websites
are our popular portals. Without them, we're sad hermits growing
hump-backed and bitter over horoscope charts, ignored and mocked. Get out
there. Spread the word."

There are many good reasons to get out there, of course. And they
begin with the fact that Sun Signs are the gateway to natal charts. As
serious and real as any other form of astrology, they are invaluable in
modern life, no matter how or why they work - with all their Neptunian
strangeness.

Kim Farnell compares Sun Sign columns to first aid and natal chart
work to heart surgery. I think they are very necessary elephants. Isn't
it time we began including them more comprehensively in our conferences,
at our universities and in the structure of our profession itself?

The Astrological Association is a registered charity dedicated to the support and promotion of astrology in all its branches. For over fifty years, it has been serving the astrological community through informing and bringing together astrologers from all over the world, via its stable of publications, its annual Conference, Kepler Research Day and other occasional events, and its support of local astrological groups. It also represents the interests of astrologers generally, responding when appropriate to issues raised within the media.

The first book available in English by the great French master astrologer Andre Barbault. The Value of Astrology offers incisive, captivating insights into the origins, classical tradition and modern uses of astrology.

As one of the largest astrology portals WWW.ASTRO.COM offers a lot of free features on the subject. With high-quality horoscope interpretations by the world's leading astrologers Liz Greene, Robert Hand and other authors, many free horoscopes and extensive information on astrology for beginners and professionals, www.astro.com is the first address for astrology on the web.