I have taken this step in response to the decision by Amazon worldwide to ban the book from sale on that platform, in response to agitation from assorted Jewish organizations, including the ADL and Yad Vanshem.

The Jewish organizations said in their pleas to Amazon to ban the book that the "threats against Jewish Community Centers" which were so rife in the US in 2017 were "evidence of rising anti-Semitism" and that therefore books like The Six Million: Fact or Fiction? needed to be removed from the public arena.

As everyone now knows, the "threats against the Jewish Community Centers" all came from a Jew, Micheal Ron David Kadar, in Israel, who was only arrested after the US sent the FBI to that country, because the Israeli police had not acted against him.

When he was arrested, it turned out he had over $250K in bitcoin, payment for the thousands of threats to Jewish centers all over the world, all very handily providing the excuse of "rising anti-Semitism" to ban books...

Needless to say, when the US asked Israel to extradite Kadar, the request was refused.

So it turned out that it was all a set-up, albeit one with which Amazon played along willingly.

In reaction to this draconian and unwarranted censorship, I have waited until International Holocaust Remembrance Day, January 27, 2018, to prepare and release free on the Internet the very latest updated edition of The Six Million: Fact or Fiction?

If you want to support my efforts, please do consider buying a hard copy from the brave booksellers who still stock the book (click on the advertisement to the right please).

The censors must know that we will never back down until this wall of lies collapses under its own weight. Banning books off Amazon is merely an indication of the fact that they know their claims cannot stand up to rational investigation. Now is the time to increase the pressure!

Friday, January 27, 2017

It is worthwhile, on yet another “International Holocaust Remembrance Day,” to consider perhaps one of the greatest acts of chutzpah: siting Israel’s official “holocaust memorial” on a site directly overlooking Deir Yassin—a Palestinian village whose population was murdered out of existence in exactly the way that the Holocaust Storytellers claim happened to Jews in World War II.

The massacre at Deir Yassin took place on April 9, 1948, when around 120 Jewish terrorists from the Zionist terrorist groups, the Irgun Zevai Leumi and Lohamei Herut, attacked the village without warning.

The attack was carried out not as part of some ongoing “war,” but merely because the Zionists were then currently busy with an ethnic cleansing program to drive the Palestinians out of all land which had been earmarked to become Israel.

Plan D, or “Plan Dalet”—named after the fourth letter in the Hebrew alphabet—was launched six weeks prior to the end of the British Mandate in Palestine. It was called Plan D because it had been preceded by Plan A (February 1945), Plan B (May 1947) and Plan C (November 1947), all of which had been designed to expedite the ethnic cleansing of Palestine to make way for Jewish settlement.

Plan D consisted of at least 13 separate military underground operations which were carried out by the “Palmach”—the elite fighting force of the Haganah, the underground Jewish army—which were set to be put into action before Arab forces entered the areas allotted to the Palestinians by the United Nations Partition Plan.

For this purpose, the Haganah created a “Committee for Arab Properties in Villages,” the purpose of which was to register and take possession of all Palestinian properties in the villages the Zionist forces had conquered. Similar committees were established in major Palestinian cities like Haifa, Safad, Yafa and Tabariyah.

Early in the morning of Friday, April 9, 1948, commandos of the Irgun, headed by Menachem Begin, and the Stern Gang attacked Deir Yassin, a village with about 750 Palestinian residents.

Most sources put the number of dead at 254, including 25 pregnant women who were bayoneted and 52 children who were maimed in front of their mothers before being beheaded and the mothers slain.

Rape, mutilation and humiliation were the norm, according to survivors. Mahmoud Kassem El-Yassini, who was 5 at the time, said in his testimony that “there were [corpses of] women lying in houses with their skirts torn up to their waists and their legs wide apart; children with their throats cut open, rows of young men shot in the back after being lined up at an execution wall. There were even bodies of babies.”

El-Yassini recalls, "I remember hearing a Jewish terrorist who was touring the village and reporting the massacre, saying, 'Minus 15 Arabs. Minus 60 Arabs.' After a while his message on the radio to headquarters became: 'It's difficult to count.'"

According to eye-witness Abu Yousef, who was 21, "after the battle, the Jews took elderly men and women and youths, including four of my cousins and a nephew. They took them all. Women who had on them gold and money were stripped of their gold. After the Jews had removed their dead and wounded, they took the men to the quarry and sprayed them all with bullets... One woman saw her son taken some 40 to 60 meters away from where she and the rest of the women stood, and shot dead. Then they brought Jewish kids to throw stones at his body. Then, they poured kerosene over his body and set it ablaze, while the women watched from a distance."

Twenty-five male villagers were loaded into trucks, paraded through the Zakhron Yosef quarter in Jerusalem in front of cheering Jewish crowds, and then taken to a stone quarry along the road between Givat Shaul and Deir Yassin and shot to death. The remaining residents were driven to Arab East Jerusalem.

A final body count of 254 was reported by The New York Times on April 13, a day after the dead were buried.

At least ten houses were dynamited, and the local cemetery bulldozed. Within months, the area was resettled with Jews from Poland, Rumania, and Slovakia—who had all “miraculously” escaped the “gas chambers”—and the village was renamed Givat Shaul Bet.

Deir Yassin was wiped off the map. As Jerusalem expanded, the land of Deir Yassin became part of the city and is now known simply as the area between Givat Shaul and the settlement of Har Nof on the western slopes of the mountain.

- The dismissal of the Wannsee Conference
“extermination plan” as a “silly story” by Yad Vashem’s Professor Yehuda
Bauer;

- An expansion of the section dealing with
the fake “Gas Chamber 1” on display at the Auschwitz Camp;

- A new section exposing the hoax of the
“gassing of the Hungarian Jews” and their dispersal to labor camps in Germany;

- Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski’s evidence at
the Eichmann trial;

- A new section dealing with the
“eye-witness” evidence of Rudolf Reder from Belzec;

- The admission by Anne Frank’s father that
he co-authored the book now known as the “Diary of Anne Frank”; and

- An extract from the Korherr Report which
reveals that as of December 1942, there were only 9,127 Jews in all the
concentration camps.

In addition, the previous appendices dealing
with “survivor hoaxes” has been incorporated into the “Eyewitness” chapter.

This work is without doubt the single most
important revisionist overview of the legend of the “Six Million” Holocaust
ever yet published.

Just some of the amazing revelations in
this book include:

- How Zionists and Nazis cooperated before
the war on writing Germany’s racial laws—and in the setting up of Jewish
settlements in Palestine;

- How Zionists offered to take up arms for
Nazi Germany against Britain during World War II;

- How Nazi policy was first aimed at
encouraging Jews to emigrate, and then after the war broke out, to evacuating
them east of the Urals;

- How official German records shows that
there were 4.5 million Jews under Nazi control, and of that number, 4.3 million
lodged claims as “Holocaust victims” after the war;

- How the Soviet Union used torture to
produce the lion’s share of “confessions” extracted from Germans to support the
“extermination” allegations;

- How the Jewish lead prosecutor in the
“Einsatzgruppen” trials publicly admitted to having witnessed torture and
personally used death threats to extract “confessions”;

- Exactly what Adolf Eichmann Confessed
to—and what he did not;

- The shocking lies and distortions
contained in the two John Demjanjuk trials;

- How the Auschwitz Camp Museum has
formally admitted that the “gas chamber” it has shown to millions of tourists
is actually a fake;

- How original German architect plans of
Auschwitz show no “gas chambers”;

- How forensic chemical examination of
Auschwitz has disproved the use of Zyklon-B in the so-called “ruined gas
chambers”;

- How official Israeli and Polish
university archaeological digs at Belzec and Sobibór have failed to find any
evidence of “gas chambers”; and of how a similar dig at Chelmno directly
contradicted “eyewitness” testimony;

- How the “gas chambers” at Majdanek have
glass windows, baths, and real showers for the alleged “victims”;

- How the “carbon monoxide” gas bottles on
display at Majdanek, still connected to a “gas chamber,” are in fact engraved
and marked as “carbon dioxide!”;

- Details of the “Star of David gas chamber
tile” hoax at the 2013 Treblinka archaeological dig;

- How a delousing chamber at Dachau has
been misrepresented as a homicidal gas chamber;

- How German POWs were forced to alter a
shower room at Sachenhausen to support a Soviet show trial—but that the forgery
was so crude and embarrassing that the Communists knocked down the building in
1952.

- The Bergen-Belsen camp is also reviewed,
along with an explanation of the typhus epidemic which swept the camp in the
last months of the war and created the horror images of emaciated dead bodies
now associated with “the Holocaust.”

This new version also deals with the
“eyewitness survivor” memoirs and their outright lies and forgery, starting
with a superbly illustrated expose of the faked memoirs of “Nazi hunter” Simon
Wiesenthal and many others.

Finally, the last section discusses the
all-important question of how and why the Holocaust storytellers have gone
through so much trouble to make up the incredible story of the “Six
Million.”

If you only ever read one book about the
Holocaust, this has to be it.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

The Basel, Switzerland, Anne Frank Fonds
(Anne Frank Fund)—which controls the copyright to the Diary of Anne Frank—has admitted that the book was in fact at least
co-authored by Otto Frank, Anne’s father, after the war.

The admission proves that the book, which
is still heavily promoted as a “holocaust memoir,” is in fact largely a postwar
fabrication which contained parts of the young Anne’s diary with extensive
additions added by her father.

This is obvious from even a cursory look at
the actual diary. See, for example, the image below of two pages from the
diary, which shows both Anne’s real youthful handwriting and her father’s obviously
adult handwriting—although he signs his entries as “Anne Frank.”

The difference between Otto Frank's adult writing, and Anne Frank's juvenile handwriting, is obvious from this "original" diary page. Note the inscription top left, in Otto Frank's handwriting, signed as "Anne Frank."

As the New York Times has pointed out, when “Otto Frank first published his daughter’s
red-checked diary and notebooks, he wrote a prologue assuring readers that the
book mostly contained her words, written while hiding from the Nazis in a
secret annex of a factory in Amsterdam.”

Normal copyright on books extends only 70
years after the author’s death. As Anne Frank died of typhus in Bergen Belsen
in February 1945, the book theoretically entered the public domain in February
2015.

But, as the New York Times went on to say, the Anne Frank Fonds has now decided to try to extend copyright on the
book past the 70 year cut-off period—by admitting that Otto Frank, who died in
1980, was indeed a “co-author” after all.

While
the foundation, the Anne Frank Fonds, in Basel, signaled its intentions a
year ago, warnings about the change have provoked a furor as the deadline
approaches. Some people opposed to the move have declared that they would defy
the foundation and publish portions of her text.

Foundation
officials “should think very carefully about the consequences,” said Agnès
Tricoire, a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights in
France, where critics have been the most vociferous and are organizing a
challenge. “If you follow their arguments, it
means that they have lied for years about the fact that it was only written by
Anne Frank.”

Actually, as I pointed out in Section 110
of The Six Million: Fact or Fiction,
Otto Frank actually admitted in an Amsterdam court that much of the handwriting
was in fact his, and not that of Anne’s.

He explained that he had “transcribed” Anne’s diary
before publication, and this was why the handwriting was his. Furthermore, Otto
Frank announced, he had actually only published a “novel” called The Annex:
Diary Notes 14 June 1942 – 1 August 1944 (in Dutch, Het Achterhuis.
Dagboekbrieven 14 juni 1942 – 1 augustus 1944) and had never called it the Diary of Anne Frank. The title Anne
Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl had been given to the book’s first English
translation.

This
“transcription” by Otto Frank finally explained the 1980 report by the German
Bundeskriminalamt (Federal Criminal Investigation Bureau, or BKA) which showed
that portions of the dairy had been altered or added after 1951. The manuscript
was examined on orders of a West German court as the result of a libel action
brought by Otto Frank against a German publisher who had claimed the book was a
fraud.

The
manuscript, in the form of three hardbound notebooks and 324 loose pages bound
in a fourth notebook, was examined with special equipment. The results of tests
performed at the BKA laboratories show that portions of the work, especially of
the fourth volume, were written with a ballpoint pen. As ballpoint pens were
not commercially available until after the war, the BKA concluded that those
sections were added after Anne Frank died.

The
real story of Anne Frank is tragic enough, but the cruel exploitation,
exaggeration, and faking of her diary by the Holocaust storytellers is a
scandal of epic proportions.

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

One of the more commonly perpetuated myths
around the Holocaust is that the Nazis held a conference in the Berlin suburb
of Wannsee on January 20, 1942, where the “extermination of the Jews was
planned.”

“There, on January 20, 1942, after a hearty
meal, senior Nazi officials met and decided how to exterminate the Jewish
people. The detailed minutes of that meeting have been preserved by successive
German governments. Here is a copy of those minutes, in which the Nazis issued
precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews. Is this
a lie?”

The simple answer to Netanyahu’s question
is, yes, this is a lie. An outright, shameless, blatant lie.

- The Wannsee meeting and its minutes do
not contain a master plan to kill Jews;

- Nowhere in the meeting’s minutes is
genocide discussed, planned, proposed, or even suggested;

- The Wannsee meeting never discussed gas
chambers, shootings, or any of the fantasies propagated by the
exterminationists;

- The Wannsee Minutes reported that there
were only 4.5 million Jews under German control (yet 4.3 million Jewish
compensation claims have been lodged against the postwar German government);

- The Wannsee meeting was a planning
meeting on how Europe’s Jews should be deported, via transit camps, to the
East; with able-bodied Jews being forced to build roads and other labor
intensive tasks in those regions;

- The Wannsee Conference also made
allowance for specific exceptions to Jewish evacuation, such as Jewish German
World War I veterans; ALL Jews over the age of 65; and ALL Jews working in
industries vital to the German war effort, to be released from the threat of evacuation
and be allowed to stay in Germany.

There is therefore, no justification for
the allegation that the Wannsee Conference was a ‘master plan for mass murder’
and everyone who claims this to be the case, from Netanyahu down, is simply
lying.

That the Wannsee Conference never discussed
killing Jews in any way, has actually been confirmed in public by Yehuda Bauer,
professor of Holocaust Studies at the Avraham Harman Institute of
Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Bauer is also the founding editor of the
journal Holocaust and Genocide
Studies, and a member of the editorial board of the Encyclopaedia of the Holocaust,
published by Yad Vashem in 1990.

He is not, therefore, as some
Holocaust storytellers claim, some obscure figure, but a leading and major—in
fact, one of the most senior—Jews promoting the Holocaust fable.

As long ago as 1992(!), Bauer, speaking at
a conference held in London to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Wannsee
meeting, told the audience that the claim that Wannsee was a “master plan” to
kill Jews was nothing a but a “silly story.”

Bauer’s remarks were reported in the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of January 23,
1992, and the Canadian Jewish Times
of January 30, 1992.

London (JTA)—An Israeli Holocaust scholar
has de-bunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said to
have gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprints of
the ‘Final Solution.’

According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer of the
Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, ‘but hardly a
conference’, and ‘little of what was said there was executed in detail.’

Bauer addressed the opening session of an
international conference held here to mark the 50th anniversary of the decision
to carry out the "Final Solution". "But it was not made at
Wannsee", the Czech born scholar said.

"The public still repeats, time after
time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived
at, Wannsee was but a stage in the unfolding of the process of mass
murder," he said.

His comments were repeated in the Canadian Jewish News, which read as
follows:

Wannsee’s importance rejected

London (JTA) — An Israeli Holocaust scholar
has debunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said to
have gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprints of
the “Final Solution.”

According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer (photo) of
the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, “but hardly a
conference”, and “little of what was said there was executed in detail.”

“The public still repeats, time after time,
the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at.”

In other words, even the leading “Holocaust
scholar” in Israel knows that to claim that the Wannsee Conference was all
about “killing Jews,”or as Netanyahu told the United Nations, that the minutes
contain “precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews
. . .” is an outright lie, a "silly story."

Once again, like everything else associated
with the “Holocaust,” the Wannsee Conference myth collapses when subjected to
even the most basic investigation.