National Geographic and the Stone Age Swindle?

The latest in a series of swindles concerning the evolution of man has recently been exposed by the European press.

This article reports details not likely to be announced
in the popular press and shows that the pattern for this type of deception has
been consistent over this past century.

The
adventure began in 1971 when a hunter named Dafal reported the discovery of a
Stone Age tribe of men, women, and children living in the thick rain forest of
Mindanao, an island of the Philippines in South-East Asia. Dafal had informed
Manuel Elizalde, the Presidential assistant on National Minorities under the then
Marcos government. 'Manda' Elizalde had in turn contacted National Geographic
magazine in Washington with an offer of exclusive rights to the story of the century
where a deputation from this age would meet with men still living in the Stone
Age.

The prospects were considered significant enough to
engage the attention of NBC television, by which the event could be brought to
the US television audience rather than confined to the National Geographic readership.
For his part in the deal, Elizalde was assured of a prominent place in this historic
venture, and he confidently expected that the kudos would raise him above a rather
minor governmental post. In any case, there was the $50,000 that NBC had paid
him for exclusive rights.

So it was that
in December, 1971, the North American television audience was treated to
a unique jungle meeting
between the Presidential assistant and some naked dwellers of the Stone Age.
The National Geographic special ‘The Last Tribes of Mindanao’ will
have been fixed in the memories of millions of viewers. However, the story
needed a
follow-up because to this point the meeting had simply been in the jungle and
no one actually knew where or how these Tasaday people lived.

It
was left to Dafal to gain the confidence of the tribe chief named Balayem,
who eventually took his new-found friend to the tribe’s cave deep in
the jungle. But the tricky question was, How do you get the National Geographic and
NBC team to the cave? The thick jungle and uneven terrain made it totally impossible
to cut a landing strip for a plane or even a helicopter. Besides, as Elizalde
explained, the entire territory must be protected against loggers who would come
and exploit the forest once there was a foothold.

It was
decided to send in a small party headed by Dafal, who would build a temporary
landing pad for the reporters on top of a tall tree near the Tasadays’ cave.
Very soon a stick and rattan platform was precariously lashed to the top
of a
truncated tree. Seventy-five feet below lay the jungle floor, so steeply sloped
that it was only just able to support mature trees.

The
Alouette 3 helicopter hovered while its passengers climbed down on to the platform,
then down the tree. This was the strange doorway in time by which the adventurers
made their exit from the Space Age and passed into the Stone Age to meet
those
whom ‘evolution’ had supposedly left behind. They were met by Balayem,
who led them to the cave. Here they spent two days filming life in the Stone
Age.

The
Tasaday people, naked except for a slim genital pouch for the men, and a grass
skirt for the women, lived off the jungle. They knew nothing of agriculture.
They
had stone axes like the oldest tools of the European Paleolithic and they learned
to use the fire drill, a device from ‘pre-history’. By whirling a wooden
rod back and forth between a man’s palms, a spark could be nursed into
flame with dried threads of vegetable fibre.

Prophecy

Working through two interpreters, fragments of information
emerged. There were 24 in the tribe; they all had names; half the men had wives,
but there were not enough women for the others; they did not share wives. They
had lived in the cave as long as they knew and their ancestors had lived there
before them. Strangely, they remembered a prophecy from their ancestors which
told of an outsider who would come and love and protect them and lead them out
of darkness. That saviour was recognized in the person of ‘Manda’ Elizalde.

Although
there were no professional anthropologists on the team of reporters, it was agreed
by all that quite contrary to some scholars’ beliefs, these Tasaday people
were not innately murderous as our hominid ancestors supposedly were. There were
gentle, and affectionate. However, apart from this one fact every other expectation
of what Stone Age man was like seemed to have been wonderfully fulfilled. Clearly,
the tribe must be protected if the were to learn the deal with a dominant Westernized
Christian culture. Accordingly, President Marcos himself later declared the entire
territory a reservation, off-limits to outsiders.

The story
was duly reported in the August 1972 issue of the National Geographic magazine
(142:218) and gave spectacular visual reinforcement of the textbook descriptions
of the Stone Age, all in glorious Kodachrome. Darwin’s ascent of man had
once more been confirmed, and not a word more was heard of the Tasaday people—until
April, 1986.

At the fall of the Marcos government
early in 1986, the truth about the Stone Age tribe began to leak out. A Swiss
journalist, Oswald Iten, investigated the affair and reported it in the Swiss
newspaper Neue Zurcher Zeitung (84:77). The three-page story appeared
in the weekend issue for April 12–13 under the banner headline ‘Steinzeitschwindel’—or
‘Stone-Age Swindle’. It was indeed a swindle. Both National
Geographic and the NBC television network had been taken in hook, line, and
sinker by the ‘gentle Tasadays’.

It turned out
the masterminds were Elizalde, whose motive was self-aggrandizement, and Dafal
the ‘hunter’, who saw an opportunity to make some easy money. Dafal
and the other Manubo Blit people—Tasaday was an invented name—
lived in the village on the other side of the hill from the cave. They were slash-and-burn
farmers who lived a free and easy life, with a little hunting more for fun than
for necessity. Of course, they wore clothes like anyone else, and Oswald Iten’s
newspaper photos show some of the wives wearing rather trendy Levi’s shirts.

The
caper had involved just two or three families who were persuaded, at first somewhat
reluctantly, to remove their clothes and act like Stone Age people—living
in the cave for a couple of days for the benefit of the American visitors. It
had been necessary to rehearse with stone axes and the fire drill a little beforehand,
and the most difficult part was to adopt the vacant star of the Stone-Ager ‘as
human intelligence was just beginning to emerge.’ As the National Geographic
photos show, they managed this part of the act quite skillfully. The business
with the helicopter and landing platform was ingenious and allowed the visitors
to be taken to the cave without becoming aware of the pathways and village on
the other side of the hill. Of course, the interpreters were in on the swindle,
while the ‘prophecy’ was felt to be a nice touch giving the affair an
attractive sense of mystery.

With their usual efficiency,
Reuters wire service carried the news of the hoax to every major newspaper on
April 13, the day the story broke in the Swiss newspaper. The following day was
a ‘no news’ day, but on April 15 the US bombing of Libya occupied the
news media’s attention. As far as this author has been able to determine
no North American newspaper picked up this juicy news scoop on April 14 or since,
with the result that the public had been left with the lie. (Editor’s
note: this article was written in December 1986)

Confession?

Certainly,
it must be an embarrassing moment for National Geographic, and one would hope
that they would make a full confession to their readers—but that expectation
has a pious ring to it. The European news media, perhaps less concerned with National
Geographic’s sensibilities, have somewhat gleefully carried the story.

Just
how is it that National Geographic, having highly qualified—perhaps over-qualified—editor
and some of the world’s best photographers, were taken in by this hoax? The
answer, in a word, is preconception. National Geographic is
so
totally committed to the theory of evolution, and the evolution of man particularly,
that the Tasaday story, which appears to support the theory, was picked up and
reported uncritically.

The Tasaday affair
is not the first occasion that the West has been taken in by the East. The
Margaret Mead story
is a classic case of a young researcher with a preconceived idea who went out
to look for evidence. Of course, she found it. Her preconception was that
the
Judeo-Christian ethic imposed upon adolescents’ discovery of sexuality
conflicted with a natural biological necessity. Going to a culture essentially
free from
the Judeo-Christian influence, she questioned a small number of adolescent
girls of Samoa who quickly caught on to what the American visitor wanted to
hear.

They
told the 23-year-old Mead the most far-fetched stories of a happy society with ‘free-love under the palm trees.’ None of it was true. The ‘research’
was an instant success among those who wanted scientific license for immorality,
and the moral standards of North American life have steadily declined since. Mead
published her work in 1926. The truth was only disclosed some 50 years later,
but by this time it was too late—premarital sex is the norm, trial marriages
are commonplace, and divorce is rampant.

Anthropology,
and specifically the study of man’s origins, is an exercise in finding evidence
to support a preconceived idea, but on every occasion there is a consistent pattern
of deception. The ‘evidence’ such as the Tasaday people, or Mead’s
findings in Samoa, is brought forth to the public with great fanfare. Years later,
the truth leaks out. The ‘evidence’ is shown to have been a misinterpretation
or even an outright hoax, but very rarely does this become news and the public
is left with the lie. When examined closely, the entire evolutionary edifice
is
built upon this type of imaginary evidence which has been forcefully planted
in the public mind.

A few examples other than the well-know
Neanderthal, Piltdown, and Nebraska frauds will further illustrate the point.

Krao
Farini: the ‘Missing Link’

This is one of the forgotten pieces of ‘evidence’
today, but the pattern of deception conformed precisely to those already described.
This curious case was of a rare condition consisting of an abnormal development
of hair over the whole body of a young female. The girl, Krao Farini, was born
in Burma. At about six years of age she was exhibited at the Royal aquarium, London,
in 1882. Newspapers gave the opinion that this was a case of atavism, or reversion
to a low ape-like ancestor. The popular Scientific American for 1883 (48:247)
promoted this view by quoting from a German correspondent, but the widely circulated
English Mechanic report later in 1894 (60:429)—was more forthright,
and titled their article ‘Krao Farini: The Missing Link.’

The
general public had little choice but to believe that some kind of living ‘missing
link’ had been discovered in the jungles of Burma. The truth of the matter
was reported in the more obscure pages of the British Medical Journal for
1883 (1:28), where it was pointed out that it was simply a rare case of
hypertrichosis universalis. Far from having lived a wild life in the jungles,
Krao’s mother was actually employed at the court of the King of Laos, while
Krao herself was a very intelligent child who became fluent in English, French,
and German.

Children
born with a ‘tail’

This is a favorite
piece of ‘evidence’ which seems
to be trotted out in the popular press every decade or so. The most recent was
reported in the North American newspapers as ‘Child born with a tail’ in
May, 1982, but the facts were more soberly reported in the New England Journal
of Medicine (306:1212). Even though the medical profession is careful
to point out that the phenomenon is not a tail and contains no bones, but is rather
fatty tissue known as a caudal appendage, the popular press still prefers to leave
the impression that an evolutionary throw-back has occurred.

These
few examples relate to the origin of man, but there are many from other fields
in which the popular press has uncritically accepted the word of the scientist
and deceived the public. It should be quickly added that not all scientists
are
deceived. Usually only a handful are—those with a particular commitment
to a preconceived notion. These are deceived first before they deceive others,
which is a far more effective way of convincing others than by deliberate deception.
Although each case of deception may be dismissed as inconsequential, the discerning
mind will see that the cumulative effect has been highly significant. On each
occasion the lie has been left in the public consciousness as long as possible
so that each will overlap and reinforce the next.

The overall
effect—dare we say motive?—has been to support and confirm Darwin’s
ascent of man from brutal beginnings. Without having to openly say so, the consequences
of being led to believe this notion are to deny the biblical account of man’s
Fall from noble beginnings. Darwin and the Bible cannot both be true. Many professing
to be Christian have uncritically accepted from television and popular magazines
the lies upon which Darwin’s ascent of man is supported.

It
is hoped that the work of creation science groups will help them to see that
by denying the biblical Fall of man, they deny the need for Redemption and
the work
of the Redeemer. May we be reminded of the words of Jesus, ‘He
that denies me, him will I deny before my Father in heaven.’

Newsletter

Thank You!

Thank you for signing up to receive email newsletters from Answers in Genesis.

Whoops!

Your newsletter signup did not work out. Please refresh the page and try again.

Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ effectively. We focus on providing answers to questions about the Bible—particularly the book of Genesis—regarding key issues such as creation, evolution, science, and the age of the earth.