Bet that lawyer was paid a significant amount of money from the likes of BP and Exxon for that little peice of shit.

Won't stand up in a 'legal' court, but has every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world stating in their policy statements that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger. So whom are we to believe? Lawyers, that make a living by being paid to lie, or scientists whose work must pass peer review?

Bet that lawyer was paid a significant amount of money from the likes of BP and Exxon for that little peice of shit.

Won't stand up in a 'legal' court, but has every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world stating in their policy statements that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger. So whom are we to believe? Lawyers, that make a living by being paid to lie, or scientists whose work must pass peer review?

Click to expand...

They have to go the political/legal route, having lost the scientific debate.

Bet that lawyer was paid a significant amount of money from the likes of BP and Exxon for that little peice of shit.

Won't stand up in a 'legal' court, but has every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world stating in their policy statements that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger. So whom are we to believe? Lawyers, that make a living by being paid to lie, or scientists whose work must pass peer review?

Click to expand...

I'll bet you plenty more that at 26.5 million of your tax dollars that Phil Jones has gotten more old fraud!

Bet that lawyer was paid a significant amount of money from the likes of BP and Exxon for that little peice of shit.

Won't stand up in a 'legal' court, but has every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world stating in their policy statements that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger. So whom are we to believe? Lawyers, that make a living by being paid to lie, or scientists whose work must pass peer review?

Click to expand...

They have to go the political/legal route, having lost the scientific debate.

Click to expand...

The only people that have lost are AL Gore and his cronies konrad. In the UK where "An Inconvenient Truth" was placed on trial as propaganda it lost. Badly. And what is more important is that unlike here in the states where any jackass can sue you and walk away with minimal cost if he loses...in the UK if the plaintiffs had lost THEY would have had to pay so they were looking at a loss of millions of dollars...but they won....so you lose.

What does a lawyer know about science? Their main job is to stack juries with know nothings. Seems like they've got quite a pool here. If the science isn't settled, why are you being forced to take the legal/political route? Do you think this lawyer has the answer to what the trapped energy is doing that the deniers always conveniently forget about, as if Conservation of Energy was merely an inconvenient truth.

Right...It only depends upon the tricks of academic elites, hoodwinking alumni associations, politicians, the media and gullible fools like you.

Click to expand...

If you read posts instead of just making things up as you go, you'd know I don't base my opinion on what others say. It's the logic. If mCo2 traps heat, where's it going? Got an answer. PUT UP OR SHUT UP.

Useful Searches

About USMessageBoard.com

USMessageBoard.com was founded in 2003 with the intent of allowing all voices to be heard. With a wildly diverse community from all sides of the political spectrum, USMessageBoard.com continues to build on that tradition. We welcome everyone despite political and/or religious beliefs, and we continue to encourage the right to free speech.

Come on in and join the discussion. Thank you for stopping by USMessageBoard.com!