Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Is orthodox medicine using the right approach to treating cancer?

Cancer Can Be Cured and Is Cured.

Is orthodox medicine using the right approach to treating cancer?

Answer #9:

Your medical doctor probably told you that you would get a "response"
if you used their protocols. A "response" simply means they were trying
to shrink your tumors slightly and has absolutely not hing to do with extending life!!

Here is what a medical doctor said about the focus of orthodox medicine
on shrinking tumors:
"When a patient is found to have a tumor, the only thing the doctor
discusses with that patient is what he intends to do about the tumor.
If a patient with a tumor is receiving radiation or chemother apy,
the only question that is asked is, "How is the tumor doing?" No one
ever asks how the patient is doing.

In my medical training, I remember well seeing patients who were
getting radiation and/or chemotherapy. The tumor would get smaller
and smaller, but the patient would be getting sicker and sicker.

At autopsy we would hear , "Isn't that marvelous! The tumor is gone!"
Yes, it was, but so was the patient . How many millions of times are
we going to have to repeat these scenarios before we realize that we
are treating the wrong thing?

In primary cancer, with only a few exceptions, the tumor is neither
health-endangering nor life-threatening . I am going to repeat that statement. In primary cancer, with few exceptions, the tumor is
neither health-endangering nor life-threatening. What is health-
endanger ing and life-threatening is the spread of that disease
through the rest of the body.

There is nothing in surgery that will prevent the spread of cancer.
There is nothing in radiation that will prevent the spread of the
disease. There is nothing in chemotherapy that will prevent the spread
of the disease.

How do we know? Just look at the statistics! There is a statistic
known as "survival time." Survival time is defined as that interval
of time between when the diagnosis of cancer is first made in a given
patient and when that patient dies from his disease.

In the past fifty years, tremendo us progress has been made in the
early diagnosis of cancer. In that period of time, tremendous
progress had been made in the surgical ability to remove tumors.

Tremendous progress has been made in the use of radiation and
chemotherapy in their ability to shrink or destroy tumors. But, the
survival time of the cancer patient today is no greater than it was
fifty years ago. What does this mean? It obviously means that we are
treating the wrong thing !"

Philip Binzel, M.D., Alive and Well, Chapter 14 Dr. Binzel was one
of those medical doctors who switched from orthodox medicine to
alternative medicine. He used liquid laetrile therapy by I.V. in
Ohio before his death. His son was an attorney or likely he would
not have been permitted to use that protocol in Ohio.

The Solution For Disease FREE Health.

If your medical doctor told you that orthodox treatments extend life, compared to doing nothing, they did not know what they were talking
about (see the next question).

On the other hand, Dr. Linus Pauling, the only two-time unshared
Nobel Prize winner, did extend the life of cancer patients (compared
to those who used chemotherapy) by ten times, and all he used was
10 grams of Vitamin C a day by I.V.

In other words, those who used vitamin C by I.V., instead of
chemotherapy, lived ten times longer!! These patients had no pain
from their treatment and so me of them were totally cured.

Do you think "modern medicine" was happy about the discovery that
Vitamin C is ten times more effective than chemotherapy? Or thodox
medicine was not at all happy about Dr. Pauling and they did three intentionally faulty studies which tried to discredit him.

This should answer any questions you might have about whether the
medical labor union, the AMA, cares about patients. Whenever someone
comes up with a treatment or cure for cancer, that is superior to
orthodox medicine, it is time for damage control . Even when a two-
time Nobel Prize winner comes up with something better than chemotherapy
and radiation (and surgery in almost all cases), it is time for damage control.

It is rare when damage control is necessary, because of the media,
but when a movie star or other high profile person supports
alternative medicine; the propaganda machine is turned on in high gear.

About Me

Hi Folks, My name is Larry Nelson. I'm 67 years old, I live in central
Texas and I'm enjoying my retirement.
In May of 2007 I was diagnosed with cancer in my prostate. I wasn't
real surprised because my mother died from the 3rd battle with cancer.
I was told that, on a scale of 1 to 9, I was rated 7. They said that I
had a very short time to live unless I have my prostate removed and
follow up with Kemo-Therapy.
I tried to explain to the uroligist that I had been studying cancer
treatment on the internet and that I had decidedto go the alterative
route. I had to repeat myself 3 times to get the doctor to acknowledge
my comment. He told me that it wouldn't work.
It is now February of 2012, I don't have cancer problems that I know of.
I have lost friends to the medical treatment of cancer and I had decided
that I wasn't going to go through the HELL that they did before they died.
What I want to accomplish with this blog is...I want to let as many people
know as I can that there is a much better way to deal with cancer. There
is many people like me that have beat cancer with the alternative approach
to beating cancer.