Friday, February 28, 2014

How can a leader who is the biggest, boldest, most unconscionable
liar in American national history be viewed as a purveyor of truth when
he lives a life of deceit, deception, dishonesty and secrecy?
He relies on misconception on top of misconception in order to appear
to be constitutionally legitimate. He was strongly backed to attempt
the greatest con in the history of the world, -to make like the emperor
with no cloths and march out before the adoring masses (including 95% of
African Americans and 100% of all Democrats) and pretend that he was
undoubtedly eligible to be President, -with none of the opposition
willing to call him on his scam, including his opponent, the
pathetically compromised “Republican” John McLame, nor any of the
traitorous cowards sitting as supreme court judges.

As a result, he has been able to float on a wave of unquestioned,
unvetted acceptance throughout his life by, on one hand, boldly
pretending to be a native-born American national while on the other
pretending to be solely an Indonesian national. He’s had it both ways,
factually and politically, (taking opposite positions as Senator than as
President) -as well as sexually [google Larry Sinclair & Obama, -or
don't].
No one has ever pulled off a fraud of such magnitude that it went
unchallenged all of the way into the oval office where he was handed the
nuclear “football” with which he could end human life as we know it.
It’s the greatest scam of all time. Someday, perhaps, that fact will be
recognized publicly, but not while the current state of the nation
stands. Perhaps only dire calamity will open people’s eyes to the
falsehoods they go about their lives blind to.

Wide receiver Alex Amidon is passing up a
chance to play in the NFL in an effort to become a U.S. Navy SEAL.
Amidon, who finished his career at Boston College with three school
records, was considered among the top prospects at his position for a
professional career.
[Full Story]

In early January 2014, Bob Lonsberry, a Rochester talk radio
personality on WHAM 1180 AM, said this in response to Obama's "income
inequality" speech.

Two Americas

The Democrats are right, there are two
Americas.

The America that works, and the America that
doesn't.

The America that contributes, and the America that
doesn't.

It's not the haves and the have not’s, it's the
do’s and the don'ts.

Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the
law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don't. That's the
divide in America.

It's not about income inequality, it's about civic
irresponsibility.

It's about a political party that preaches hatred,
greed and victimization in order to win elective office.

It's about a political party that loves power more
than it loves its country. That's not invective, that's truth, and it's about
time someone said it.

The politics of envy was on proud display a couple
weeks ago when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting
"income inequality." He noted that some people make more than other people,
that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that's not
just.

That is the rationale of thievery. The other guy
has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you. Vote
Democrat.

That is the philosophy that produced Detroit. It is
the electoral philosophy that is destroying America. It conceals a fundamental
deviation from American values and common sense.

The Democrats have not empowered their followers,
they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of
victim–hood and anger instead of ability and hope.

The president's premise – that you reduce income
inequality by debasing the successful – seeks to deny the successful the
consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of
their choices.

Because, by and large, income variations in society
is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who
choose wisely and responsibility have a far greater likelihood of success,
while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater
likelihood of failure. Success and failure usually manifest themselves in
personal and family income.

You choose to drop out of high school or to skip
college – and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a
diploma and pushes on with purposeful education.

You have your children out of wedlock and life is
apt to take one course; you have them within a marriage and life is apt to
take another course.

Most often in life our destination is determined by
the course we take.

My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do.
There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an
inequality of outcome, but, our lives also have had an in equality of effort.
While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to
medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant.

He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices
led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than
mine.

Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to
take away his wealth?

No, it means we are both free men in a free society
where free choices lead to different outcomes.

It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take
away, it is freedom.

The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to
fail.

There is no true option for success if there is no
true option for failure.

The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less
when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more
happiness than the other guy.

Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did
nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime's worth of asinine and
shortsighted decisions.

Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of
outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of
effort.

The simple Law of the Harvest – as ye sow, so shall
ye reap – is sometimes applied as, "The harder you work, the more you
get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be
punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards
of society.

Entitlement will replace effort as the key to
upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a
lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the
successful and productive to foster equality through
mediocrity.

He and his party speak of two Americas, and their
grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of
the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is
divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one
man's success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man's
victimization.

What Obama offered was not a solution, but a
separatism. He fomented division and strife, pitted one set of Americans
against another for his own political benefit. That's what socialists
offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.

Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the
truth to Lincoln's maxim that a house divided against itself cannot
stand.

Sylvia Thompson

If you agree with talk radio host Rush Limbaugh, who says Obama will
never be impeached because he is the first black president, then that is
a problem. It is time for this nation to stop ignoring a full fifty
percent of Barack Obama's heritage and claiming that he is "black," as
though his mother, grandparents (who reared him) and an entire family
lineage did not exist. If you think about it, this nation has not yet
elected, in the true sense, a black president. The first American
black president will be someone like former presidential candidate
Herman Cain or former Congressman Allen West. These are men whose
heritage goes back to not simply Africans, but specifically Africans
brought to America centuries ago. That is a distinction, in my view,
worth emphasizing, given the paralysis inflicting the nation over how to
deal with Barack Obama.

Obama is a mixed-race person. His father was an African from the East
African country Kenya, and his mother was of Caucasian European descent.
That means Barack Obama is mulatto. Look it up if the word is
unfamiliar to you.

I make this point in the hope of moving at least a few souls out there
beyond the barrier that prevents them from criticizing and actively
fighting this man, who is hell-bent on destroying the country. The utter
impotence of Republican leadership in Congress; the seemingly servile
behavior of the Supreme Court (Justice John Roberts' contortive route to
approving Obamacare); the few other-than-leftist media outlets, whose
commentators soft-pedal around every unlawful move that Obama makes; all
stem, in my view, from fear of being branded racist. If Obama is black,
he is therefore untouchable, and that thinking is detrimental to this
nation.READ MORE...

Obama and the progressives have shredded our national flesh and skin
down to the exposed bone. We now look like a staggering zombie with
chunks of tendons
hanging everywhere, dripping, and splattering blood as we roll down the
street. People run to get out of the way as Obama jeers and laughs at
us in between golf
games.

Obama most certainly is "transforming" and changing America as he
promised from the beginning. Obama's goal is simple and stated in
everything he does and
speaks. It is seen in his pathetic and limited career. It is reflected
in his life-long associations, choices of church fellowship with Rev.
Wright for too many years to
ignore, and his own writings. Obama hates America and intends for
America to pay. Frankenstein has found a playmate now.

Obama's transformational goals for America

Turn us into...

Turn America into a socialist-communist regime submitted to Obama,
Islam, and international controls. Ignore Congress, seduce Congress,
threaten Congress,
and buy Congress until it is completely neutered. He is right on
target. Until perhaps the 2014 and 2016 elections...hmmmm.

Make us pay...

Make America pay for her achievements by stealing and redistributing her
wealth to Islamic and dictatorial regimes he is in bed with throughout
Africa and the Middle
East. Obama believes America's exceptionalism and leadership is in
place due to stealing from Islam and third-world countries. Certainly
our achievements have
nothing to do with being submissive to the living God of the Holy Bible
and being blessed by Him.

Destroy Christians and conservatives...

Rip to shreds the rights of Christians, gun owners, and conservatives.
Make their speech not only evil and racist, but also illegal and
criminal. Soon the arrests will
begin in droves as Christians and their voices are attacked, then
silenced. Will Christians submit...just take it...re invent theology
and the Bible to deal with the
growing threats and stress...or pray AND stand with God's leading and
power?

Make America's children and schools submit to Obama and progressives

We are seeing Obama and the left turn America into a submissive nation
of worker bees, and do this in part by transforming our children's minds
through the
federally pushed national school curriculum Common Core. This is the
same Common Core that shockingly many "poser conservatives" say they
support and that
it is good for America. In truth, Common Core should be called
Communist Core (as regular guest and political activist Christina Michas
calls it), since it violates
parent's rights, teacher and student rights, privacy rights, state
sovereignty, and flips off God and Judeo-Christian values once and for
all. It rewrites history and
replaces health and sex education with porn and amorality. It pushes
Islam and the international agenda while data mining children. It is
all about big government
turning our children into nothing but submissive worker bees, who obey
government and forget God and dreams.

Use of government agencies against the people

Obama is destroying all who stand against him – Tea Party, conservative
family and Christian groups – anyone who stands against him. He attacks
reputations and uses the NSA and the IRS as vicious and rapid attack
dogs. We see growing false arrests, spying on our phone calls, and
destroying reputations far
and wide. Safe in the privacy of your own home??? Guess again.

We...the ignorant and distracted, the too busy to pay attention, the
hands-off because he is the first black president...have fallen prey to
the most effective and deadly
attack on America in our history. Forget WWI and WWII, endless wars
with Islam and other dictators. WE ARE BEING DESTROYED FROM WITHIN AND
THE
DAMAGE IS BREATHTAKING. Many in our country and the world believe we
cannot recover. America is over. What do you believe and what do you
want?
No...WHAT ARE YOU WILLING TO DO?

Snap out of it – rise up and be healed

We are Americans, and we live in the most miraculous, Christian-inspired
and powerful country the world has ever known. Our roots, inspiration,
and skeletal core
is Christian, not Muslim or secular – not Obama. No wonder Obama, our
Muslim president, hates America. We are infidels to him. America has
served and
honored God, while bringing freedom and resources to the world since her
beginning!

There is zero reason to be ashamed or intimidated by Obama or anyone
else. Don't let anyone in our White House, in your work place, or media
rewrite our history.
Be proud to be an American and stand up.

Here is the deal folks

Americans screw up. We rebel and think we are "all that" sometimes. We
vote in the wrong people, because we are distracted and stuck on
stupid. AND
AMERICA FORGETS THAT GOD IS ON OUR SIDE, CREATED US, AND WILL HELP US
BACK IF WE HUMBLE OURSELVES AND ASK FOR HIS HELP. Read
2nd Chronicles 7: 14 again. "If my people who are called by my name
will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their
wicked ways, then will
they hear from heaven, will I forgive their sin and HEAL THEIR LAND."

Act like the REAL Americans we are. We must make the 2014 elections
count by voting in real patriots and servants of the Constitution and
truth. Egos be damned.
We don't have time for that anymore. Pray every day that God will raise
up real leaders and servants who honor HIM, and that He will heal our
land.

If Americans will rise up in mass, do the right thing, and pray to the
right God...He will show up and fix all that is needed. It doesn't
matter how powerful Obama and
his handlers think they are. They are gnats to God under His feet, as
we trust Him to protect and help us.

Those who intend to hide under the bed and give up get out of my way,
because I will stand until my last breath and scream...FREEDOM!!!

I just received an
audit on my tax return for 2012 back from the IRS. It puzzles
me!!!They are
questioning how many dependents I claimed.I guess it was because of my response to
the question: "List all dependents?"I replied: 12 million illegal immigrants;
3 million crack heads;42 million unemployed people on food
stamps,2 million
people in over 243 prisons;Half of Mexico ; and 535 persons in the
U.S. House and Senate."1 useless President.Evidently, this was NOT an acceptable
answer.I KEEP ASKING
MYSELF, WHO the Hell DID I
MISS?

This blog, all along, stuck to its guns, regarding The One’s
bonafides, even when subject to mocking. Regardless, no wishy washy,
finger-in-the-air prevarications herein, despite any recriminations.
Tsk, tsk. Like water off a duck’s back. In any event, only facts and
sound logic underlie this and that. No herd-like mentality on this end.

That being said, who in their rational mind (still) believes
the Liar-in-Chief is anything but a fraud? Come on now, even if
exposing said fairy tale lends to a cry of “racism”, so what? Where are we, in kindergarten…sticks and stones. But never mind, paradoxically, this egregious charge lands DIRECTLY at Obama’s door as he drags America towards a race war. Topsy turvy.

In this regard, a myriad of proofs prop up “birther’s” claims and they are overwhelming.

Rejection of Obama by Electoral College

REJECTION OF OBAMA BY THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

—That rather silly woman, with respect, Anne Applebaum, has
had another go at the so-called ‘birthers’ in her typically ill-informed
column in today’s Daily Telegraph. She regards the views of those who
believe that Barack Hussein Obama was born in the United States as
rational. By implication she also criticises the many Republicans who
consider that Obama was born in what is now Kenya for rejecting the
legitimacy of his claim to the presidency.
For a view to be rational it must be based on the evidence. Like
most pro-Obama commentators Applebaum does not condescend to consider
the evidence, indeed I have not seen rational discussion of the issue
anywhere in the mainstream media. For a serious consideration of the
issue you have to go online, onto reputable websites like Veterans
Today.
The competing theories may be shortly stated. President Obama and
the Democratic Party claim that he was born in Honolulu in the State of
Hawai’i on August 4th 1961. They have been consistent about
the date but not the place. Two different hospitals were put forward at
different times in the 2008 election (I have been tracking this issue
since Obama first came on my radar, as a state senator in Illinois,
about ten years ago). The President and the Democrats have now settled
on the Kapio’lani Maternity Hospital in Honolulu. Mainstream media
commentators like Anne Applebaum are seemingly unaware that two
different US birthplaces have been put forward by the President and his
supporters. They tend to take the latest White House position as fact.
The Kenya theory, supported by many Republicans, a broad swathe of
the international intelligence community (behind the scenes) and, in the
public domain, by the entrepreneur Donald Trump, asserts that the
President was born in or near Mombasa in what is now Kenya. Within this
group there are five main sub-groups – those who say that the date of
birth is correct but not the place, those who put the birth in 1960,
those who say that the claimed maternal relationship is true but not the
paternal relationship, those who put it the other way round and those
who accept the claimed parentage but not place of birth. There is of
course cross-over between these groups on the date of birth.
The CIA, semi-publicly, accepted maternity but challenged paternity.
Two names for the father, including the radical black activist ‘Malcolm
X,’ were privately circulated by ‘sources close to the CIA’ in 2010 and
2011. The CIA’s true position, supported I am told by a DNA test, is
that the claimed paternity is correct but not maternity. Their official
position is of course the White House line, i.e. that President Obama
is eligible to be sworn in as President on January 21st.
The CIA were actually quite slow to get to grips with the issue. So far
as I know no work was done on it until I briefed them in, in 2007.
Both MI5 and MI6 held out on them for some months afterwards, indeed I
don’t think MI6 made full disclosure of their position until CIA had the
DNA test done (I am told they used wine and water glasses, with the DNA
swabs verified by fingerprints). Homeland Security are said to agree
with the CIA’s internal assessment. They of course have access to the
immigration and passport records, which have never been disclosed
publicly and are apparently troubling for the Democrats.
The Mossad, DGSE, BND, SVR, MI5 and MI6 go with Mombasa, although
there is some disagreement between the agencies about date of birth.
SVR are rumored to favour 1961, e.g., whereas MI6 and Mossad are said to
go with 1960. MI5 have a file because the colonial internal security
files came over from Nairobi in 1963. Since Obama’s father and
grandfather were both linked to the Mau-Mau terrorist organization they
were very properly made the subjects of intelligence and police
surveillance.
There is actually very little evidential support for the Honolulu
theory. The document the media refer to as a ‘birth certificate’ is
nothing of the sort. It is an electronic facsimile, unsupported by
matching Hawai’i file entries, which are sealed. I respectfully
associate myself with the criticisms of this document by the forensic
specialists who examined it at the behest of Arizona lawman Sheriff Joe
Arpaio. It consists of multiple layers and appears to have been
generated by software. It is not an original, nor even a photocopy of
an original.
It does not take the case very much further, save that its production
is damaging to the White House’s credibility, as was the production of a
shorter-form purported certificate in 2008, which was denounced at the
time as a forgery by a Hawai’ian official, although the state then
backtracked, under intense political pressure. The older fabrication
was a two-dimensional computer file, which appeared to have been
photo-shopped. The purported official seal lacked depth, a common
mistake by forgers.
There is a self-serving entry in the Honolulu Advertiser,
which again takes the case no further, since it has always been clear
that the ‘parents’ were claiming the birth of a baby boy named Barack in
Honolulu on 4th August 1961. The address in that advertisement was not real however, an odd feature.
There are some surprising lacunae in the evidence produced. The
claimed mother’s medical records, e.g., have never been released. That
calls for comment, since in the US there would have been an attending
physician. One would expect to see some reference in the medical records
for a teenage girl undergoing her first pregnancy. There are no
photographs showing Ann Dunham whilst pregnant, and no evidence that she
took ‘her’ child with her to Washington State, after she left school in
Honolulu. There are no photographs of Barack Obama in the US before
the age of about two.
Neither of the alleged places of birth has a record of Ann Dunham
being admitted in the first week of August 1961, hospital admission
records being something investigators have been calling for over four
years. There are no supporting records from the attending physician,
whose name was suppressed for some three years after the issue started
to gain traction. There are issues over the numbering of the long form
birth certificate produced, which does not appear to be in sequence.
The relevant immigration records are sealed, something which troubled
Sheriff Arpaio, an experienced lawman, and his investigating posse. I
know some have challenged the sheriff’s good faith, but I see no reason
to question it. He is a man of the highest integrity - we are not
talking Thames Valley Police here.
The passport records are relevant, because President Obama cannot
have visited Pakistan during the al-Huq dictatorship on a US passport.
On what basis was he issued a passport by another state? If Indonesian
what was said to the Indonesian authorities about his date and place of
birth?
The President’s college records are relevant because he appears to
have received scholarship funding for which he would not have been
eligible had he been born in the USA. It is also a valid point that he
took no steps to correct a book-cover bio describing him as Kenyan-born,
a fact of which Anne Applebaum seems to be unaware.
Article 2 of the US Constitution seems to me to be clear enough. To
be eligible for the presidency a candidate presented to the Electoral
College has to be an American Citizen, born in the United States. It is
a matter entirely for them but I see no reason why the Electors could
not ask for evidence of Barack Obama’s eligibility. That applies to all
candidates of all races from all parties by the way.
I don’t accept that Senator McCain was eligible to be sworn-in, as in
my opinion he was born in a hospital in downtown Colon, in Panama. It
wouldn’t matter if he were born on Coco Solo Marine Corps Air Base, as
he claims, as that was not in the United States. Quite where on the
base he was born is a moot point, since the hospital was not built for
another five years. I don’t accept that Senator Goldwater qualified for
the presidency either – his eligibility was queried at the time, as he
was born in a territory, not a state.
If I am right in my conclusion that President Obama was born in what
is now Kenya (it was then the Coastal Protectorate) he cannot have been
born to Ann Dunham, as there is no evidence she was in Kenya in 1960 or
1961. Since she is his route to US citizenship (a somewhat doubtful
route at best, since his father was already married and the form of
ceremony of marriage between Ann and Barack Hussein Senior was bigamous)
birth in the Protectorate would also take down his US Citizenship. He
has never naturalized and is not in my opinion a US Citizen by birth
(jus soli) or descent (jus sanguini).
If those conclusions are right Vice-President’s Biden suitability to
be President might be called into question, on the ground that he either
knew or ought to have known that the President was ineligible, although
that would more properly be a matter for Congress on impeachment, not
the Electoral College, as I read the US Constitution, not least as some
states bind their electors to follow the popular vote.
We might see the House Speaker as President before next year is out.
He might want to look out his birth certificate, a document the
Democratic Party could have called for before nominating Barack Obama in
2008 (it’s odd that there is almost no due diligence on presidential
candidates, but there is for presidential nominees once they’ve been
elected).
9th November 2012

Shrimpton was a speaker at a forum, date unknown, but probably sometime in 2008 (more on this later). Beginning at the 1:42 mark of the video below, Shrimpton dropped a bombshell about Obama.

Shrimpton made the following startling claims:

Although Barack Hussein Obama (BHO) is said to have been born on August 4, 1961, he actually was born in 1960.

Obama’s alleged mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was not pregnant in July 1961.

Although
BHO is said to have been born in Honolulu, Hawaii, he actually was born
in Mombasa, Kenya, which was then British territory, which means
British intelligence has his records.

The
C.I.A. surreptiously took a DNA sample of Obama at a fundraising dinner
and ran a test, but could not match Obama’s DNA with his [maternal]
grandparents, the Dunhams.

Former
New York governor and GOP presidential aspirant Rudy Giuliani told
Shrimpton at a recent lunch that he (Giuliani) knows all about this.
Giuliani had hoped he would be the GOP presidential candidate and he’d
then use the information against the Democrats.

The Clintons (Bill and Hillary) also know about this.

For the rest of the 1½ hour video, Shrimpton talked about British politics and the European Union. However, at the 1:09:30 mark, a man in the audience asked Shrimpton a question about Obama and Kenya. In his response, beginning at about the 1:11:55
mark, Shrimpton alluded to the 2008 U.S. presidential campaign as if it
was ongoing as he spoke, which suggests that the forum took place in
2008. Shrimpton also made these additional claims:

He believes, given the above British intelligence on the year (1960, not
1961) and place (Kenya, not USA) of Obama’s birth, Obama would “soon be
pressured into withdrawing” from the presidential race. With the
benefit of hindsight, we of course know that didn’t happen.

Senator John Edwards also knows because Shrimpton had briefed him.

Former
CIA director (under Bill Clinton) also knows. Shrimpton does not name
him. Clinton had 3 successive CIA directors: James Woolsey, John
Deutsch, and George Tenet.

British Intelligence knows because MI5 got the Nairobi Special Intelligence files when Kenya became independent.

Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations from 1997 to 2006, also knows.

Shrimpton
also said something very strange — that Obama’s half-sister is actually
his full sister, and that the sister is “missing.” (The only “half
sister” of Obama about whom we are told isMaya Soetoro-Ng, the daughter of Stanley Ann Dunham and her Indonesian husband, Lolo Soetoro.)

IN
OTHER WORDS, JUST ABOUT EVERY FRIGGING POLITICIAN IN THE UNITED STATES
AND THE WORLD KNOWS. AND EVERY FRIGGING ONE OF THEM HAS BEEN LYING TO
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

loretta fuddy accident

Since the day it was announced that Loretta Fuddy, the Director
of the Hawaii Department of Health who verified Obama’s birth
certificate died mysteriously in a plane crash, there was some question
of whether is was really an “accident”. The authorities seem to be
saying, yes. But, because of her close ties to the fraudulent Obama
Birth Certificate, many people fear that she was the most recent in
Obama’s “dead pool” and haven’t stopped looking for real answers. It
seems that amateur bloggers and Youtubers are the new
Investigative Journalists in this new media society of “give the
President a pass, or be a racist”.
I recently came across a video and still photos that were
meticulously retrieved by a fellow blogger, from the Ferdinand Puentes
GoCam videos that he took of the plane crash on December 11, 2013 in
which Loretta Fuddy died. The photos can be found here: http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/extras/ . She has more shots there than I am showing, so check it out. Many thanks – great work!
The Puentes video originally aired on ABC in January 2014 and can be seen here. http://abcnews.go.com/US/harrowing-video-hawaiian-plane-crash-inside-cabin/story?id=21484715
The segment depicted below is at about 3:23 minutes in the video and
lasts about 3 seconds. There has been a lot of speculation about this
“accident”, as so many things just don’t add up. The story of a tragic
death was reported before rescuers had even gotten to the plane. First
reports indicated someone remained in the plane, when in fact, all got
out. And the only death was the one person who really might know the truth about Obama’s birth certificate.
It took a month for vague autopsy results. The local police and the
NTSB couldn’t decide who was in charge of the investigation into her
death.
Dr. Fuddys death was declared to be from a problem with her heart –
natural causes, and we’re all supposed to believe that it was all just a
tragic accident, but after seeing these photos, all doubt is gone. As I
looked through the still shots taken from the video, my blood froze,
because I knew what I was seeing. I am seeing a diver do something to Loretta Fuddy, which I assume was murder, and it chills me to the bone.
I hope that law enforcement can be made aware of what seems to be shown
in these pictures, so they can investigate it. Just look, please. Form
your own opinion.
The first photos are reference photos of what I think you’ll be able to see in the actual photos. (they are NOT actual photos of the divers in the video- the shoe is really Dr. Fuddy’s)

THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE

The photos below are in sequence. The ones on the left are the originals – to the right I have highlighted what I see. Beyond frightening.
This whole video sequence takes about 3 seconds in real time.The series
of photos shown below are the actual stills of the events that are
shown on Ferdinand Puentes video. http://abcnews.go.com/US/harrowing-video-hawaiian-plane-crash-inside-cabin/story?id=21484715
These photos have been zoomed and cropped by Butterdezillion. In the
GoPro video, the action is actually quite a distance away. You can click
on any set to enlarge them to see better.

Start with Picture #1, and follow the
sequence like a movie. I have labeled people and things on the right
hand picture. This is Loretta Fuddy on the right and Keith Yamamoto on
the left. He is looking at her. She is laying back into her flotation
device. Her head is just visible and one shoe is visible. The shoe is
important – and remember, all of this takes about 3 seconds in real
time.

So, there you have it. Loretta Fuddy is floating in her life jacket holding hands with her Assistant, Keith Yamamoto.
A diver completely dressed in black surfaces momentarily for about 3
seconds and seems to be doing something to her foot or leg. My
theory is that he administered some type of injection that ultimately
caused Dr. Fuddy’s death. The he lets go and vanishes. The plan was not
to be seen, but she may have felt something and pulled her foot away,
and he had no choice but to surface to get to the foot. I have no idea
why that would be so important, unless they felt that a medical examiner
is less likely to see an injection site on a foot or ankle.

Others seem to think that what I see as a
foot is a second diver, because Loretta Fuddy was wearing “Black shoes”.
As we see from the top reference pictures, the shoes had a tan or beige
sole, which with the lighting could easily brighten to light yellow.
Look at the head of the man in the foreground – he’s yellow, too. The two hands holding the foot in picture #5 are what makes me sure of what I’m seeing.
Also, the objects closer to the camera appear larger than those further
back – again reference the size of the top of the head in the
foreground. As we know the plane sank within 25 minutes, and it is still
visible in the video, these are NOT rescue divers

Even if I’m wrong about the shoe – this IS A
DIVER who shouldn’t be there and is clearly up to no good. Whatever
this is – it is frightening. I hope that the right people are made aware
of this and that it can be followed up on appropriately.

FYI -this pictures terrifies me.
What kind of world do we live in? The further implication to this photo
is that this was a STAGED accident. It is no coincidence that a plane
lost it’s engine within swimming distance of two divers/assassins. We
also then have to wonder if the pilot was in on it, unless the divers
were ON THE PLANE and the engine was sabotaged. Either way, someone
planned this, and Dr. Fuddy is dead.

Obama vacationed in Hawaii 10 days later.
Had Dr. Fuddy indicated to the wrong people that she would like to
“talk” to him about “things” i.e the fraudulent birth certificate she
personally signed off on? Step up law enforcement and main stream media,
before it’s too late for all of us, too.

Somehow, some way, I would hope that this article would be disseminated
throughout the land and read by all Americans. No doubt read
enthusiastically by those patriots who fully understand the frightful course
our country is taking, this essay will nevertheless be ignored by the
vast majority of citizens who blissfully go about their lives unaware
that their country has been hijacked and that their freedom and
liberties are being stolen by the very people that have been entrusted
to preserve and protect them. Many of these unenlightened can be
characterized quite simply as stupid and ignorant; constituting the vast
majority of the Democratic/Socialist/Communist Party’s voting base here
in America. They are the clueless who go to the polls and negate the
votes cast by the informed voter. They are the brain-washed or
brain-dead; the “me first” voters.

Then there are the haters; those who will simply deride and demean this
message. These are the spiteful, malevolent Marxist/Communists types,
the “give me more” entitlement voters, the social justice aficionados,
the intolerant anti-life, anti Christian crowd, the self-professed
victims, the global warming fanatics and the myriad of progressive
social engineering freaks and miscreants who are waging a vicious and
un-relenting war against traditional American Christian and family
values . Theirs is a nasty “win at all costs” campaign driven by
intolerance and hate, deceit, lies, insults and intimidation.

This despicable and ungrateful lot is readily discerned. They are all
around you. Simply put they are the Obama androids. They are the herd
that refuses to look at the
truth, refuses to be intellectually honest, ignores common sense and
will never allow facts to illuminate or fertilize their feeble minds
lest it interfere or defeat their “at all costs” agenda. These are the
true haters of America; they despise the Constitution and the
foundational principles upon which this country was founded and they
despise you and any other person who dares get in their way. They are
the Obots and they are led by America’s number one enemy: Barack Hussein
Obama, purported 44th president of the United States and the principle
conspirator and perpetrator of the greatest crime ever committed against
the American people.

In the media some of the more notable bootlickers are Chris Mathews,
Eugene Robinson, David Corn, Juan Williams, Andrea Mitchell, Donna
Brazile, Chris Hayes, Candy Crowley, Savannah Guthrie, George
Stephanopoulos, Barbara Walters, Ed Schultz, Keith Olbermann , Anderson
Cooper, Al Sharpton, Lawrence O’Donnell , Arianna Huffington, Oprah
Winfrey and Melissa Harris Perry; for that matter anyone and everyone
at MSNBC. Actually there are literally hundreds if not thousands of
these media frauds. They lack a personal sense of ethics and moral
responsibility. They are incapable of maintaining any allegiance and
loyalty to the citizens; they are incapable of accuracy and
truthfulness. They are hypocrites of the highest order, blinded by skin
color and their socialist/new world order agenda; they are undoubtedly
the biggest reason why the truth about
Obama’s identity has not been widely reported in the mainstream media.
There are others who are culpable in this massive cover-up but the
mainstream media outlets and these so called journalists have done a
masterful job of hiding the truth from the American masses. Shame on
them. And then there are the Mark Levin and Bill O’Reilly types who
posture and pontificate as they too in their own way provide cover for
the illegitimate Obama.

Shrimpton reported Obama's purported mom was not pregnant
in 1961 and that Obama was born in Kenya in 1960. He said Kenya was
under British intelligence files and that Obama's father ran guns for
the Mau Mau. He then dropped a bombshell claiming the CIA did covert DNA testing on Obama at a fundraising dinner and the test came back with no match
to the claimed grandparents. Shrimpton said Rudy Giuliani's people knew
and sat on the intelligence and further stated he spoke with Hillary
Clinton's people and that they were quite interested.

I
don’t recall when I first wrote about Obama telling lies, but it surely
must have been early in his first term, if not even earlier in the 2008
campaign. So much of the information about his life was subject to
question that it raised my concern.The way ObamaCare was reamed through a Congress that hadn’t even read the bill put me on full alert. No Republican voted for it.When you have spent your early years as a journalist as I did you
tend to develop a healthy skepticism regarding politicians. There are
some very good people who go into politics, but they are vastly
outnumbered by those who see it as an easy way to line their pockets.
They are the “Eddie Haskell’s” if you are old enough to remember the
unctuous character from “Leave It To Beaver.” Glad-handers,
back-slappers, and generally smooth talkers.

Is
John Kerry the most anti-Israel Secretary of State ever? John Foster Dulles and
James Baker set the bar high. Is he the most dishonest? He is not responsible
for the cover-up, the betrayal and the outright lies regarding the Benghazi
attack.

Is
he the dumbest? Madeleine Albright was tough competition. Poor dear. Imagine
the shock of finding out in advancing middle age that you are Jewish, and never
having guessed anything, even though all your cousins and their sisters and
their aunts were Jewish.

On the other
hand, even she would probably not have claimed, as Kerry just did, that
“climate warming is a weapon of mass destruction” and “the greatest challenge
of our generation” and dismiss out of hand the huge number of skeptics: “We
should not allow a tiny minority of shoddy scientists and extreme ideologues to
compete with scientific fact.”

Kerry
certainly gives Madeleine Albright a run for the money as our most inept
Secretary of State.Remember his claim
on the war in Iraq? “I actually did vote for the $87 billion, before I voted
against it.” So let’s cut him a little slack here. Maybe he actually was a
friend of Israel before he wasn’t. Or is it that he wasn’t before he was or
never was. He was always confused.

In
October 2003, Kerry said Israel’s unilateral construction of a security fence
was “a barrier to peace.” “I know how disheartened Palestinians are by the
decision to build the barrier off the Green Line,” he told the Arab American
Institute National Leadership Conference. “We don’t need another barrier to
peace.” In February 2004, he reversed himself, calling the fence “a legitimate
act of self-defense,” and saying “President Bush is rightly discussing with
Israel the exact route of the fence to minimize the hardship it causes innocent
Palestinians.”

Will
Kerry claim one day that he was actually against negotiations with Iran before
he wasn’t? The Ayatollah continually affirms :“There is no use [to the
negotiations]… It will not lead anywhere.” And it’s reported “Senior Iranian
officials say they won’t accept any major curtailment of the program.”

Again,
let’s cut our Secretary of State a little slack. He is so busy, obsessive and
messianic in bullying Israel that he can’t concentrate on Iran’s march towards
nuclear weapons.

In
one respect though, John Kerry has it over all previous occupants of the role
of Secretary of State. He is the only one with a history of maligning, libeling
and defaming the United States and its soldiers. Yup. Here, he takes the cake.

During his campaign for the Presidency in 2004
he boasted of his combat service and the medals that he won on the swift boats
in Vietnam. That was a big mistake. It stoked the memory of veterans who could
not forgive his libel on April 22, 1971 when Kerry testified to a Senate
committee that American soldiers in Vietnam were “war criminals.”

He
elaborated: “These were not isolated incidents, but crimes committed on a
day-to-day basis, with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command.
It is impossible to describe to you exactly what did happen in Detroit—the
emotions in the room, and the feelings of the men who were reliving their
experiences in Vietnam. They relived the absolute horror of what this country,
in a sense, made them do. They told stories that, at times, they had personally
raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to
human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies,
randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Ghengis
Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged
the countryside of South Vietnam, in addition to the normal ravage of war and
the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing
power of this country.”

Kerry
was challenged by thousands of veterans and lost that Presidential
election.But the question still hangs
in the air.

How
could a man who libeled this nation so horribly have become a United States
Senator, then a Presidential candidate of the Democratic Party and now a
Secretary of State?

Again,
let’s cut him a little slack. It is rumored that one of the Purple Hearts he
won was for shrapnel in his buttock.In
certain very esoteric cases an injury to the buttock can cause brain damage.

The military cuts announced Monday by Defense
Secretary Chuck Hagel will hurt future presidents' ability to protect
the country, says former Vice President Dick Cheney. "I've obviously not
been a strong supporter of Barack Obama, but this really is over the
top. It does enormous long-term damage to our military," Cheney said
Monday.
[Full Story]

AMERICA'S NUMBER ONE ENEMY

Are you willing to continue the fight for freedom for our Posterity?

As people who believe in the principles and philosophies of the United States Constitution, we number in the majority. As folks that dare to consider standing against the tyranny being perpetrated by the Obama administration, we are in the majority across this great country. But the clock is ticking. Will we continue to entertain the idea that sitting on the couch complaining as we watch the news on television is an effective strategy, or are we ready to take action, and do more than rally at Tea Party events, or occasionally write an email to our representatives? Are we ready to do more than complain? Are we willing to, as the signers of the Declaration of Independence stated in the last sentence of the document, put on the line our “Lives, Fortunes, and sacred Honor?”

SUPPORT LAW ENFORCEMENT

Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. - E. Vattel

JUST HOW DEVIOUS AND CORRUPT IS OBAMA AND HIS BAND OF MISCREANTS, PERVERTS AND LIARS?

Keeping Track of Obama Lies, Broken Promises

By Peter Andrew – ConservativeAmerican.org – Leading the way Right.

“President Obama is himself a broken promise. The love affair Americans had with the idea of the beautiful racial harmony we would get if we elected a half-black man to the White House has been ruined by the reality that President Obama means nothing that he says and intends to keep none of his promises.” – David Kraemer, ConservativeAmerican.org

The list below contains all of the Obama Administration mistakes, blunders, broken promises, flip flops, gaffes, lies, etc. That’s too long of a name, so we called it “the Official Obama Administration Scandals List.” This list covers Barack Obama and his pals from day one through September 4th, 2011. At that point, the list was discontinued. However, you can see information on more recent scandals on our NEW Obama Scandals List by clicking here! We present this list to you as an accurate and complete historic detail of the Legacy of Lies President Obama leaves behind for the time period starting with his youth and going until September 4th, 2011. Not responsible for any broken or out-of-date links. They worked when we posted them. Some may redirect you to the wayback machine.

You can visit all the pages of the Official Obama Administration Scandals List!

WAKE-UP AMERICA!

BIRTHER REPORT LINK

LINK TO POST & EMAIL

Latest news re: Obama Corruption & Fraud

WHERE'S OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE LINK:

IMPEACH THE USURPER

The case for impeaching Barack Hussein Obama

We the People of the United States

Pending an acceptable outcome of the vitally-important 2014 election—which affords the opportunity to elect a Congress that is willing to initiate impeachment proceedings against Barack Hussein Obama, and thereby stop, or even remove from office, this fraudulent usurper and his inner circle of collaborators—We the People of the United States of America affirm our allegiance to the timeless principles upon which our nation was founded, as set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States, and upon the foundation of those principles, declare the causes which impel us to seek this despotic president's impeachment and removal.

We hereby allege that the history of the current President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the American people. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world—

ARTICLE 1—Contempt for the Constitution

Mr. Obama has engaged, throughout his despotic tenure as president, in rule by edict and executive decree, bypassing Congress, and thus the will of the people, to enforce policies entirely of his own creation. Ignoring the federal government's foundation of a separation of powers, he has routinely violated duly enacted statutes of the Legislature, as well as defied the Courts, in pursuit of ultimate supremacy over the United States of America. In so doing, he has exhibited an unmistakable pattern of contempt for the U.S. Constitution, which prior to his ruinous tenure had served two centuries as the Law of the Land.

We therefore demand that this criminal, treasonous individual be removed from office without delay and held accountable for his destructive behavior, and that all his unlawful acts as president be considered of no effect or validity. We believe that the only effective way to achieve this urgent goal is to initiate impeachment.

ARTICLE 2—False pretenses

Mr. Obama has attained the office of president in a verifiably fraudulent and criminal manner, and upon a false identity and false pretenses.

We therefore demand immediate release of all currently sealed documentation of who he is; what his true history entails; what his earlier school, travel, and other records reveal about him; what his original (not photocopied) birth certificate makes clear; and all other relevant information in the public record now suppressed or intentionally falsified regarding him. We the People of the United States have a right to know such things about a man who currently serves as Commander-in-Chief of our nation's armed forces and oversees the entire Executive Branch of the U.S. government. We believe that the only effective way to force release of these records is impeachment.

ARTICLE 3—Criminal fraud

Upon taking office, Mr. Obama criminally defrauded Congress and the American people with false promises, uttered repeatedly in the public record about the nature, scope, and effect of his signature legislative achievement, "Obamacare," in a deceptive effort to gain passage of this catastrophic measure, which authorizes a sweeping federal takeover of America's healthcare industry.

We therefore demand that this healthcare travesty be immediately revoked, defunded, and declared null and void, and that this president be held accountable for intentionally misleading and defrauding the citizenry by means of this insidious scheme—a scheme that has already diminished the rightful choice of most Americans regarding their healthcare, has caused millions to lose their jobs due to its workplace requirements, and will cost our nation its material viability and vitality if allowed to go forward. We believe that the only effective way to ensure the dismantling of Obamacare is impeachment.

ARTICLE 4—Deliberate bankrupting of the U.S.

In a deliberate scheme to force the financial collapse of the United States, Mr. Obama and his collaborators have pushed the nation's "public debt"—that is, the difference between public spending and public receipts—to an unsustainable 17 TRILLION dollars, an amount exceeding our nation's Gross Domestic Product (or total value of goods and services) and more than doubling the debt's previous rate of growth. The effect is to impose an indebtedness of over $50,000 upon every man, woman, and child in the U.S., and more than $150,000 per taxpayer, numbers that indicate the U.S. is headed toward insolvency and our posterity will be forced to bear the dire consequences. The effect is even more dire when "unfunded liabilities" are factored in.

We therefore demand that the individual behind this destructive scheme assume all liability, upon his own person, for the amount the national debt has increased during his tenure, in company with all others who have collaborated with him in the Executive and Legislative Branches of the federal government in enacting this policy, listing them by name, and that the American people at large be absolved—by binding decree—of any and all liability for such wanton abuse of the public purse. We believe that the only effective way to attain such simple, reasonable justice is impeachment.

ARTICLE 5—Treasonous national security policy

By insidious design and outright treachery, Mr. Obama has dangerously weakened America's national security—through his emasculation of our military; his unilateral reduction of our missile defense system, thereby weakening American military superiority and inviting nuclear conflagration at home and abroad; his deceitful promotion and arming of radical Islamic interests in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and elsewhere; his catering, in domestic and foreign policy, to the Muslim Brotherhood, which is on record seeking the destruction of the United States; his fraudulent relations with Iran that will likely ensure this radically hostile nation succeeds in developing nuclear weapons; his continuing disregard for the vital interests of longtime American ally Israel; his unreasonable handicapping of our military's rules of engagement, dangerously favoring America's enemies; his alarming pattern of dismissing high-ranking military officers for groundless or superficial reasons; and similar anti-American policies and actions too numerous to mention.

We therefore demand that the Obama administration be forced immediately to cease and desist from its treasonous, unconstitutional, conspiratorial plot to take down America, and our allies with it, and that a sane, pro-American policy be adopted in its place for the purpose of protecting our nation from all threats to its continuance. We believe that the only effective way to enforce this urgent demand is impeachment.

ARTICLE 6—Treasonous cover-up of Benghazi

Mr. Obama has deceitfully sought to cover up his administration's involvement in a covert operation in Benghazi, Libya, that ran afoul September 11, 2012. The president's fabricated narrative of the causes and nature of the episode, which resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, has been shown to be a cynical attempt to divert attention from what actually happened, including reports of treasonable administration dealings with terrorist insurgents in Syria. The administration's interference with investigations by Congress into the matter, and its the muzzling of witnesses and participants, hints that only the tip of the iceberg has yet been revealed regarding Mr. Obama's contemptuous behavior and dereliction of duty in this bloodstained scandal.

We therefore demand that all witnesses who have firsthand knowledge of the truth regarding the Benghazi fiasco be permitted to come forth without threat of retaliation and give their account of any and all relevant facts—including mounting evidence of Obama administration sympathy for Islamic terrorist organizations. We believe that the only effective way to ensure such unsuppressed testimony is impeachment.

ARTICLE 7—Plot to disarm the citizenry

Mr. Obama has repeatedly attempted to take advantage of isolated acts of violence in our nation involving firearms in the hands of deranged individuals to deprive law-abiding Americans of their constitutionally-guaranteed right to keep and bear arms, in a direct assault on the Second Amendment by someone who himself poses a growing threat to the security and well-being of our nation; and he has repeatedly made known his intention to succeed with his unconstitutional goal of disarming the people despite any setbacks he may encounter in Congress. So intent is he on imposing gun control that he even engaged in a deadly gunrunning hoax known as "Fast and Furious" to incite sympathy for tightening U.S. gun laws, then invoked executive privilege to cover up his administration's criminal involvement. He and his administration have also withheld or destroyed vital physical evidence that would corroborate events at Newtown, CT, in which 20 schoolchildren and six adults were reportedly killed by a disturbed gunman with an assault rifle—an incident the president has shamelessly exploited in his push for oppressive new gun legislation.

We therefore demand that the president immediately abandon such pursuit of tyranny and seek refuge in a nation more to his liking, one that already bans, or severely restricts, gun ownership by law-abiding citizens in consequence of despotic notions of governance. We believe that the only way to hasten this outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 8—Undermining U.S. border security

Similarly, Mr. Obama has repeatedly sought to undermine U.S. border security, and by extension America's very independence, by pushing misnamed "immigration reform" that would in reality open wide our borders, overburden the public coffers, and grant amnesty to the many millions of unlawful occupiers who have entered the country by stealth. Unable to achieve this agenda lawfully, through Congress, he has undertaken to achieve it dictatorially, in open violation of the Constitution and statutory immigration law. Ostensibly, the president intends, by his abandonment of longstanding U.S. immigration policy, to create a permanent under-culture of dependent immigrants who have little allegiance to America's founding ideals, upon whom to stand to remain in power indefinitely—either by himself, or in the person of likeminded schemers within his party.

We therefore demand that our nation's borders be made effectively secure, that existing immigration laws be reasonably and fairly enforced, that all persons seeking citizenship play fundamentally by the same rules, no matter the petitioners' origins, and that Mr. Obama's immigration policy and initiatives be rejected by Congress as the threat they are to our nation's security and strength, with his deceptive drive for "immigration reform" relegated permanently to the backwaters of history. We believe that the only way to ensure this outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 9—Engaging in mass surveillance

Mr. Obama has engaged in notorious overreach regarding domestic surveillance. A certain degree of targeted domestic surveillance may be considered justified, even essential, to protect American citizens from harm if conducted with appropriate oversight and in harmony with reasonable law—but indiscriminate spying on all citizens is indefensible and constitutes the very essence of a police state.

We therefore demand that the routine eavesdropping now being conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA) be curtailed to conform with appropriate safeguards, to permit only those functions that can be constitutionally defended. We believe that the only way to leverage this outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 10—Abusing IRS authority

Likewise, Mr. Obama and his IRS subordinates have notoriously abused the public trust by singling out, and arbitrarily penalizing, patriotic organizations awaiting approval of tax-exempt status so they might fundraise legally. By delaying approvals and sharing confidential information with potential adversaries, for purely political reasons, the Obama administration has violated federal statutes, and unlawfully handicapped these groups in their efforts to counter Mr. Obama's tyranny.

We therefore demand substantial monetary damages for these aggrieved organizations, and expedited approval of all "Tea Party," "conservative," and "libertarian" groups in the future. More to the point, because of its unavoidably political nature, we seek abolition of the IRS itself, and its replacement by a reasonable consumption or flat tax. We believe that the only way to bring about such an outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 11—Subverting America's morality

Most far-reaching and adverse of all his insidious deeds, in the acknowledged biblical perspective of our Creator, is that Mr. Obama has undertaken to subvert America's moral strength and means of perpetuation by promoting measures that weaken the natural, God-ordained family, and escalate the unthinkable aborting of America's posterity. As part of this corrupt effort, he has sanctioned the unconstitutional silencing of conscientious citizens and clergy who oppose homosexuality and its growing inclusion in lawful marriage; and he has approved stipulations in his healthcare plan that would force Americans opposed to abortion, or to anything related involving abortifacients or contraceptives, to directly fund such morally-offensive practices. These immoral, destructive policies—integral to the president's sweeping plan to transform America—militate not only against the Constitution, but the foundations of Judeo-Christianity upon which America is historically premised, to which the president appears to have an aversion.

We therefore demand that biblical morality be once again allowed the place of respect it has long enjoyed at the center of our nation's culture—on its own merits, without federal interference of any kind that would violate the First Amendment. We also call for immediately ending the moral and material travesty known as "Obamacare," including any requirement that American citizens or businesses personally underwrite abortion. We believe that the best way to ensure this fortuitous outcome, and reverse these federally-enforced intrusions, is the president's impeachment.

In every stage of these and other oppressions that could be cited, we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms—but our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury and blatant lies. A fraudulent usurper whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people, much less their president.

We the People, therefore, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do solemnly publish and declare, that because Barack Hussein Obama has verifiably corrupted, compromised, and endangered the essential institutions of the American Republic, as well as threatened the nation's very survival, we hereby appeal to the next Congress of the United States—which will convene in January 2015—to begin impeachment proceedings against Mr. Obama, and his fellow lawbreakers and facilitators within the Executive Branch, for the purpose of removing them from office with all diligence.

For the support of this action, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, We the People mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor, to save our beloved nation and preserve the rights and freedoms bequeathed us by God and protected by our revered Constitution.

The MCSO Cold Case Posse (CCP) is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. We are awarded no tax dollars and have no paid staff. We are supported by membership dues as well as donations from corporations and individuals in the county we serve.

If you would like to make a contribution to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Cold Case Posse, please click on the "Donate" button directly below. Your donation is greatly appreciated. Remember, in most cases, your donation to CCP is deductible. Please consult with your tax professional regarding any tax related questions.

By clicking on the below "DONATE" Link, you will be leaving the MCSO Cold Case Posse website. Within a few seconds, your browser will be redirected to a secured Paypal site at which point you can safely and securely make your donation.

Translate

THE TERRY LAKIN STORY

Barack Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and is thus constitutionally ineligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military. Obama was born to a FOREIGN NATIONAL FATHER who was NEVER a U.S. Citizen nor was Obama’s father even an immigrant to the USA or even a permanent resident in the USA. For no other U.S. President in the history of the nation since the founding generation (who were exempt from the natural born Citizen clause in the U.S. Constitution via a grandfather clause in Article II Section 1) was that the case, i.e., having a foreign national father who was never a U.S. Citizen or even an immigrant to this country. Obama being seated as the putative president is an outrageous violation of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, the presidential eligibility clause. Obama was not born with sole allegiance to the USA. Sole allegiance and unity of Citizenship at birth was the goal and purpose for putting the natural born Citizen clause into Article II Section 1 of the Constitution as to who could serve as president once the founding generation has passed away. Obama (II) was born a British Subject via his foreign national father Obama (Sr.) who was a British Subject. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to constitutional standards since he was born with dual allegiance and citizenship. The founders and framers did not want anyone with foreign allegiance to ever get command of our military, i.e., be the president. Obama is constitutionally not eligible to be president and commander in chief of our military.

The Obama constitutional eligibility issue is not a fringe issue! South Carolina Poll Results – A poll done by Public Policy Polling (PPP) shows that almost 2/3 of GOP voters want Obama’s constitutional eligibility and true legal identity investigated. This is not a fringe issue: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=340805

CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR DR. HERB TITUS(Not Mark Levin)
DESCRIBES "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN"December 12, 2011 (TPATH) The honorable John Jay, the first leader of the United States Supreme Court, initiated the insertion of "Natural Born Citizen" into the Constitution for the purpose of setting a higher standard for the office of the President.
All of the verbal gymnastics being put forth by the left, as to the meaning of the term, will eventually be proven to be just what it is.
Unlawful defense of an individual and political party at the expense and detriment of this country.
When you watch this video you will begin to wonder how this country continues to allow such simple and precise language to be twisted, manipulated and convoluted.
WATCH THE VIDEO PART ONEWATCH THE VIDEO PART TWO

We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on.

On MARCH 23, 1775, Patrick Henry spoke to the Second Virginia Convention, which was meeting in Richmond's St. John's Church due to British hostilities:

"I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery...

We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated...We have prostrated ourselves before the throne...

Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence."

Patrick Henry continued:

"There is a just God who presides over the destines of nations...who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us.

The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave...

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!

I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death."

Miki Booth’s book, Memoirs of a Community Organizer in Hawaii, will be released in late November, 2011. The book chronicles events and experiences over a lifetime culminating in the biggest adventure of all for the writer—an “Adventure in American Politics.” When Miki found others that shared her

Usurper In The White House-Constitutional Crisis

AMERICA IN DISTRESS

Obama Sr a Kenyan was never a US Citizen. He could not pass on US Natural Born Citizenship status to Barack Obama Jr. No matter what is on Obama's birth certificate, no matter where he was born, he can NOT satisfy Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution.....No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of the President, neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Search This Blog

"Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."-- Abraham Lincoln

"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it."-- John Adams

The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite."-- Thomas Jefferson

"If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."-- Samuel Adams

It has been reported how past Hawaiian State practices with its birth certificate procedures have presented opportunities for birth certificate fraud. An example of such fraud is that of Chinese native, Sun Yat Sen, one of the founders of the Republic of China, who was born in China but was able to obtain a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth in 1904 based on his fraudulent affidavit and evidence submitted by witnesses to the Hawaiian authorities stating that he was born in Hawaii on November 24, 1870. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9830547/Sun-Yatsen-Certification-of-Live-Birth-in-Hawaii. See also the September 2000 report of the Office of Inspector General, entitled “Birth Certificate Fraud,” which provides an update on the nature and extent of birth certificate fraud, found at http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf. Because of critical importance of knowing for sure who the President is, the potential for birth certificate fraud, and since Obama’s original long-form birth certificate housed in the offices of the Hawaii Department of Health can be some type of certificate (even a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth) that is based on some family member’s affidavit of personal knowledge but which includes no documentary evidence of an actual birth in Hawaii, it becomes crucial to confirm whether there exists any corroborating evidence of Obama actually being born in Hawaii. Consequently, various members of the public have tried to obtain information that would adequately confirm Obama’s and the State of Hawaii’s statements that he was born in Hawaii. These concerned citizens have made requests to the State of Hawaii and to various hospitals there for such information. The State of Hawaii, Kapi’olani Medical Center, and Queens Medical Center (originally claimed by Obama’s sister to by his birth place) have publicly stated that they cannot release the needed details of Obama’s birth, including whether his deceased mother was even a maternity patient in any of those hospitals, because of Obama’s state and federal privacy rights. Not being successful, some of these concerned citizens, feeling duty bound to the Constitution and our country, have filed law suits and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) actions against Obama and others to obtain this information.

Given that Obama and/or his agents have already publicly released some information regarding his place of birth, one commentator, William, has asked me on my blog ( http://puzo1.blogspot.com/. ) whether Obama has waived his privacy rights to such birth information. At least two arguments can be advance that Obama has waived any privacy right that he might have in his birth information located in the State of Hawaii and in its hospitals. One is that he has waived his privacy rights to his alleged long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate by posting his COLB on the internet for the world to see. A problem with this argument is that the COLB does not disclose all his private information (name of hospital, doctors, etc.) and he can argue that his waiver is only as to the information contained on the COLB and no more. As a response, it can be argued that Obama waived his privacy right as to the identity of the hospital in which he was born given that he allegedly wrote a letter dated January 24, 2009 to Kapi’olani Medical Center in which he acknowledge being born there and which letter the hospital posted on its web page (suspiciously posting not a scan of an actual paper letter but only a computer-generated image created with HTML code) for the world to see. For more details, see the WND story on the letter at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=104146. I have grave doubts whether this letter is authentic given that both Obama and U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie D-Hawaii, who allegedly gave the letter to the hospital and publicly read the letter during the hospital’s centennial celebration, refuse to confirm whether this letter is real.

The second argument is more powerful and convincing. Under Article II, a would-be President must be a “natural born Citizen” to be eligible for the Presidency. Hence, any candidate knows that such “natural born Citizen” status is required to hold the public Office of President. No one winning an election and wanting to fill that public office has a reasonable expectation of privacy as to where he/she was born given that job’s eligibility requirement that one must be a “natural born Citizen.” See my article on this blog entitled, Obama’s Personal Right To Privacy Cannot Trump The Right Of The People To Know Who Their President Is, at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-personal-right-to-privacy-cannot.html. Of course, that person’s obligation to prove his/her “natural born Citizen” status includes providing credible, competent, and sufficient documentary and other evidence of, among other things, place of birth. Clearly and without doubt, the public interest in knowing that the President-elect is eligible for the office he/she seeks to fill by far out weighs any privacy interest that the person may have in his/her birth documents. It is also clear that knowing who the person is who will occupy the Office of President and Commander in Chief concerns national security and the safety of the United States and the whole world. It is not reasonable to believe that such a person’s privacy interest would out weigh the People’s need to safeguard national security and for self-preservation. Simply put, it would be beyond absurdity to honestly contend that such a person has a right to shield from the same People that he/she is constitutionally duty bound to serve and protect information that he/she must provide to them to show that he/she is qualified for that singular and all-powerful public position which would vest him/her with great power to affect every aspect of the People’s lives.

But underneath the privacy rights question lurks a much more serious concern. We can see the absurdity of Obama sitting on privacy rights to conceal his long-form birth certificate from the public. It is downright despicable for our media and Congress and others to apologize for Obama and let him get away with it. They know full well that he has no such privacy rights. The birth information and documents that Obama refuses to reveal to the public surely are revealing of whether his is eligible to hold the Office of President. Why has the media not filed any legal actions against Obama, the State of Hawaii, and other parties, seeking to legally lift any privacy barriers to Obama’s birth information as it has so many times in the past filed actions against others running for public office who sought to prevent the public from learning details of some aspect of their private lives? What is a travesty of justice is that Obama was probably able to win his U.S. Senate seat because the media (Chicago Tribune) filed a legal action against rival Republican Jack Ryan in which it was successful in getting the “kinky sex” details of his divorce released to the public. Why the media in our country would believe what type of sex two consenting married adults practice is more important than making sure that the national security of our country is protected is beyond comprehension and represents the quintessence of warped priorities. I do not believe that anyone who truly cares about our country and Constitution can express enough in words the outrage that he/she feels about how cowardly our political leaders and media have acted with Obama on the question of his place of birth.

Congress has abdicated its constitutional oath and the media, the so-called fourth branch of our government, has failed to perform its journalistic duty to the People of the United States to assure them that Obama’s election to the highest and most powerful office in the land adhered to our Constitution and laws. Congress has been given a chance to correct its failings and still it refuses to perform its constitutional obligation. With the assistance of its media cronies and others, they all ridicule and suppress the efforts of those who are fighting to make sure that our Constitution has been respected in the last Presidential election and that our nation is safe with Obama currently occupying the Presidency and being the Commander in Chief of our military might.

We must then ask ourselves why Congress and the media have not pressed Obama for the necessary and relevant birth information for at least the sake of the integrity of the Presidential election process and the safety of our nation? Moreover, Obama cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizen” because under the British Nationality Act of 1948 when Obama was born in 1961 his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was born a British subject/citizen. See Obama, the Putative President of the U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html. Like a naturalized citizen who is not eligible to be President, Obama was born with an allegiance to a foreign power and is therefore not eligible to be President and more so not eligible to be the leader of our military men and women. To allow Obama to hide his birth information and to not challenge him for not being an Article II “natural born Citizen” is nothing more than at best, politicians and those in their coterie allowing corrupt party politics, self-interest, and/or cowardice to blind their constitutional duty to protect and defend our country and Constitution, at worst, part of someone’s plot to attack and destroy the United States from within, or both. Given that any attack on the United States will most likely come from within, these latter two scenarios must be given serious consideration and ruled out only after sufficient evidence exists to so rule them out. Hence, the deliberate or reckless failing by those who are supposed to protect and defend our country and Constitution is tantamount to treason.

All members of Congress that have allowed and continue to allow the raping of our Constitution and the placing of our nation at risk to being attacked from within need to be removed from Congress, without any exceptions. As to what to do with those members of the media and others who have failed and continue to fail to do their job to adequately protect and defend our Constitutional Republic, that is a question for another day.