2009/1/14 ? wrote:
> Hmm, interesting point... One possible advantage of having the boundary
> information in the response could be that it makes it possible to
> "re-post" the response data to the server as-is: you just replace the
> c:response wrapper with c:request and pass it to p:http-request, without
> being forced to set the boundary information in c:multipart.
Yes, I didn't think about that case.
> But I guess that the real question is: Does/can having the boundary
> information in the response cause any issues?
Maybe not. But having it required could maybe be an issue for an
implementation, I am not sure the existing APIs for HTTP do provide
this info.
Regards,
--
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/