It is common to excoriate the Nazis for trying to breed
the Superman--actually, the Overman--a human being who, among other things, would
be stronger, smarter, less disease prone than most humans, and who would be the
next step up the evolutionary ladder.

Of course, it's perfectly okay
to selectively breed other animals, but we humans are somehow supposed to be above
scientifically breeding ourselves for better qualities. Instead of trying to improve
ourselves, we're supposed to just let the blind workings of nature have their
way. After all, we're humans. We're just below the angels. Of course, it was humans
who decided that we're just below the angels. Other creatures might not feel so
sure about that.

In truth, there's nothing wrong with wanting to make better,
healthier humans so long as it's done in the right way and avoids the mistakes
of the old eugenics movement of the past. Scientific breeding is nothing less
than willed evolution. And, if we want humans to evolve, we may have to start
paying as much attention to our breeding as we do to the breeding of dogs, cats
and horses.

As background, consider the fact that some people
believe that we have reached a stasis point in the history of human beings when
we must either step in and guide our evolution up or we will start devolving down.
When thinking about this subject, it may be helpful to imagine that nature has
had our species (and all other species, for that matter) on some sort of automatic
evolutionary escalator and that as the escalator moves us higher, some get off
at lower floors while others keep riding. Could it be possible that humans have
now reached a place between floors where the escalator has slowed down and is
preparing to reverse itself and become a down escalator instead of an up escalator?
If so, we're going to have to struggle to remain right where we are by walking
fast enough to compensate for the downward movement of the escalator. And, if
we start walking really fast, we may be able to reach the next higher floor. If
we do reach that next higher floor, and thus move higher on the evolutionary scale
which gets harder and harder the higher you move, maybe there will be no way from
that floor to the ones above except difficult and dangerous stairs that we have
to somehow find and then really climb all by ourselves. Will we try to make that
climb that will most assuredly require enormous mental strength and which will
probably also require some sort of religious or spiritual knowledge to overcome
the inertia of our existence?

Of course, the easiest thing to do would be just
to stay on the escalator that is now going down, and it'd automatically return
us to lower floors with no effort on our part. That, with or without the escalator
imagery, appears to be where humanity finds itself at this time.

While
such talk of escalators and about walking faster might help us visualize the process,
such examples don't help us in a practical sense. What must we actually do to
will our evolution? How do we move higher? The answer, as you already know from
the earlier paragraphs, is that we must breed ourselves for those qualities and
features that we believe are higher and more desirable and which are uniquely
representative or emblematic of our genotype while we attempt to breed out those
qualities and features that we don't consider so desirable and which we have inherited
from earlier forms. In real world terms, it's as simple as, say, choosing mates
with blue eyes if we consider blue eyes to be a desirable feature and then having
as many babies as is physically possible.

Of course, the multiracialists don't want us to think
along these lines or to try to breed up. The multiracialists' idea of a perfect
world is apparently to have all humans be pretty much the same in most characteristics--a
one size fits all Tan Everyman. This means, to them, that white genes--which are
the rare and different genes among humans--must be destroyed. When I speak of
"white genes" here, I mean those genes or combinations of genes that
express themselves in ways that add up to producing non-Jewish white European
descended peoples (who are only about 10% of all humans on earth).

The
multiracialists know that breeding the Tan Everyman requires no real effort other
than that required in breaking down white people's resistance to their own genocide.
It is white people, by their very presence, and even when they don't realize it,
who are standing in the way of the creation of the Tan Everyman. Remove white
people by all means possible including convincing the weak minded ones among whites
that there are no real genetic differences between the races of man and most of
the battle is won.

On the other hand, breeding the species up, maybe to
a White Everyman, requires real effort. In this regard, I'm reminded of some of
the things that Homeless Jack has said about white people being the human equivalent
of light and that they, like light, can only exist with the expenditure of a lot
of energy and with constant struggle. In other words, it takes effort to have
light, and if Jack is right, to have white people, while it does not take effort
to have darkness and non-white people. Anyway, that's what Jack says he read,
and maybe it does present us with some of those hidden connections that seem to
invisibly crisscross the cosmos that cause weird things and so-called coincidences.

Evolution leading to speciation is a relatively slow
process involving many matings and isolation. What about something faster--willed
mutation? Is that possible? Mutations occur all the time. Many people reading
this probably have a mutated gene or two and don't even know it. Some of these
mutations will remain unknown and will disappear in the next generation as the
person with the mutation mates with those without it. However, if the person mates
with a person with the same type of mutated gene, then the offspring may end up
with two copies of the mutated gene and in this case, the mutation may be expressed
in some way. The reason that close relatives are not supposed to mate is because
the chance of passing on two genes with the same harmful defect is greater in
such matings. Of course, and on the plus side, the chance of passing on two genes
with the same beneficial improvement is also greater when close relatives mate.

A
good example of this mutation process comes from news reports this week about
a four year old boy who, ironically, is from Germany. Doctors have discovered
that the child has a mutation that causes him to be extremely strong and to have
about half the body fat of normal kids his age. It turns out that the kid has
a mutant DNA segment that blocks production of the protein myostatin that limits
muscle growth. As a result, the kid, who apparently otherwise looks like any other
normal kid his age, is something of a mini muscleman. Reports say that he can
hold seven-pound weights with his arms extended; something that is difficult for
many adults to do. Doctors say that his mother has one copy of the mutated gene
and one normal one while the boy has two of the mutated genes. This means that
his father also had at least one copy of the mutated gene and passed that on to
the child. No information about the father was disclosed in news reports, but
it was stated that the mother's brother and three other close male relatives all
were unusually strong.

Suppose, that when this kid grows
up he decides that he wants to preserve his mutation. To accomplish this, he could
try to find a mate or mates who also have two versions of the mutated genes. This
wouldn't be that difficult with modern gene testing. Then, he and the mate(s)
he chooses would probably produce children who are just as strong as he is. If
these children then decided to continue the process, they would find mates with
the gene mutation and have their own children. If all of these people decided
to have as many children as possible and if all of them worked to breed true,
eventually this family might become a tribe, then a nation, and maybe, eventually,
a different species of human. That's what is meant by willed evolution and willed
mutation.

To give this a little different perspective, you
may have heard about a race horse named Smarty Jones who was expected to, but
who didn't, win the Kentucky Derby earlier this month. Had Smarty Jones won the
Kentucky Derby he would have become the first Triple Crown winner in many years.
What you may not have heard, was that 17 of the 18 horses in the race, including
Smarty Jones, were all related through a family line that went back to a horse
named Native Dancer who won the Preakness and Belmont in 1953.

So,
you can breed horses for speed and that, to us, is an improvement of the species
when we're talking about race horses, but what do we breed humans for? Speed?
Not likely. Big brains? Sure, but that's not enough. We could end up with big
brained humans who are weak or who have other defects. Remember, designing creatures
is like designing machines. There are tradeoffs to be made. Build for certain
kinds of strength, for example, and you often lose speed. Race horses aren't good
at pulling plows and plow horses aren't good at racing. It's virtually impossible
to design anything that is good at everything.

What if we do breed humans and what if we're wrong
in thinking that the characteristics we're breeding for are good ones? What then?
Well, we just adjust as we go. That's what nature does. Most white people thinking
about this subject would probably say that we should breed for white skin, blue
eyes, blond hair, thin body build, big brains--sort of like what we see in the
best of the Scandinavians, but perhaps with more robustness than we normally associate
with present day Scandinavians. Maybe those who think this way are right. Certainly,
it appears that the Scandinavian human type is as far removed from the Tan Everyman
type as possible, and maybe this means that the Scandinavian type is the ideal
type for white people. Then again, there are all those dumb blond jokes. Hmmm.

One thing is certain, humans generally seem less
concerned about improving their breed than they are about improving horses, dogs
and cats.

One last thing from the news this week:
Scientists now report that they have figured out how to tell the skin and eye
color of criminal suspects from DNA left at crime scenes. This is a discovery
that was predictable to those who understand the importance of DNA. Every bit
of us is in those spiraling strands.

Even with this further proof that skin color is not
just skin deep, the multiracialists will, no doubt, continue with their lies about
there being only one human race. The sad thing is that many white children are
propagandized with these lies to the point where they internalize them and thereafter
never doubt that they are true. Then, when these Stepfordized white children grow
up, many of them commit their own genocide by mating with those who are not of
their genotype.

Homeless Jack even links DNA to
being able to understand a little about God. He says those spirals within us,
when they're right, are the physical part of our "essence" and that
they vibrate in tune with the spirals of God. He also sometimes talks about the
light within causing white skin without.

# # #

TWO BOOKS BY H. MILLARD
Available at finer bookstores, by phone, or on the net.

2. THE OUTSIDER - (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millards underground
classic story of alienation is
available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235:
"Millard is an important writer" New Nation News "Millard
is an original. His books aren't like your typical fiction. If you don't know
where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche"
- a reader.