We know that leftism is encouraged by school and the media. But it doesn’t explain why, now and then, we find a real hard-core leftist in our own families, just like sometimes, some parents are surprised to find that their new born child is a redhead. So, maybe the leftist mindset is partly in the genes. But I think that only few people are real leftists. In the population, there isn’t a regular continuum from right to left with half the people on the right and half of them on the left. Rather, I think most people are conservatives, and a small minority is “leftist”, with a markedly different mindset. I think the real leftists are less than 10% of the population, but it is difficult to tell a natural-born leftist from someone who simply goes along with what the media preaches.

I don’t think that support for immigration can be in the genes of leftist people. There is no reason we cannot find leftists who want to defend the white lower class, and who strongly disagree with the race-replacement program. We need them on our side. A century ago, very few leftists would have agreed with our replacement with non-whites. But race replacement is now the main element in the Jewish political program, and the Jews are the backbone of the institutional left.

Even though the leftists are a minority, it seems that everything in our public political life proceeds from the left. In fact, it is the Jewish media that gets to define everyone else on the political spectrum. So, they classify anyone who stands against race-replacement as right-wing, far-right, nazi, racist, supremacist, evil.

My own opinion is that the right is simply made of normal people with the most common mindset. Opposition to immigration isn’t right-wing, it is a matter of common sense. Being called right-wing is like being called antisemite. It is like firemen being called anti-arsonist. Actually, the problem isn’t anti-arsonism.

I disagree with Bertonneau’s comment on one point: the problem doesn’t exactly come from the left. It comes from the Jewish-dominated FAR-LEFT. And in fact, the far-left doesn’t even belong to the left. The left is supposed to be kind, compassionate, and egalitarian, while the right is supposed to be pragmatic. But the “far-left” that controls the media isn’t compassionate. The Jews don’t care about equality. Their motivation is racial and anti-white.

Just like right-wing voters, most people who vote for the left are ordinary, non-politicized, non-ideological people. I don’t think that voting for the left is in their genes.

Yes. To the extent left/right is biological, it is at best a tendency, a preference. The jews and their racial animus drive the anti-White/pro-non-White agenda.

The “far” fallacy: far-right/racist/nazi is code for White, far-left is code for the jews.

According to preliminary results from the interior ministry, the UMP and allies took 47 percent of the vote nationwide while the Socialist party and allies took 38 percent, and the FN five percent — far higher than its 0.9 percent result in the first round of 2008 municipal polls.

Applauding what she said was “an exceptional vintage for the FN”, Marine Le Pen — head of the anti-immigration, anti-EU party — said the polls marked the “end of the bipolarisation of the political scene”.

Although the FN had been expected to do well, the first round results were far better than expected.

What makes Front National “far-right”?

Le Pen took over the FN leadership in 2011 and set about broadening the appeal of a party regarded as taboo by many voters in light of her father’s repeated convictions for Holocaust denial and inciting racial hatred.

As well as trying to “detoxify” the FN’s image, she has attempted to make it less of a single-issue party by campaigning on unemployment, costs of living and crime.

The “single-issue” is what’s best for the French. This is regarded as toxic by jews and other non-French who are themselves toxic to the French.

The post-racial fallacy: Left vs right increasingly openly revealed as non-White vs White.

6 Responses

I have a chuckle at the reactions I get when I tell folks that I’m a member of the WHITE WING.

This month marks the 13th year I have been TV-Free and it is the singlemost positive action one can make to their lives, families and advancement in every realm. The fallacies and brainwashing are conjured up and ON the populace by the yarmulkas in NYC and Hollywood through their media organs. Until the ‘hypnotic trance’ is broken, or at the very least, interrupted, White genocide will roll on as the tribe has planned.

How long can Whites, or even those in the lower races, say they have gone without turning on their television? A day? A week? An hour??? It’s not many because it is a severe addiction and a deadly one for Whites since the 1950s. Morally, culturally and philosophically it has wreaked havoc changing White men and women into amoral, opportunistic, spineless, mindless, trendy spectators. Only until you are out of “the trance”, can you see the mental conditioning 98+% of the populace is under.

After 4 generations of media(getting mass conditioned responses that Dr Pavlov or even Skinner would blush at) can one see the inability of any sort of reversal of the dissolution of our racial integrity. It simply will not work while our people spend a third of their lives under this “spell”.

Good stuff as usual Tan. Many people, in mainstream politics, seem to have no problem mixing right with left policies now. eg Free market economics and homosexual marriage. So why should our shopping list of left/right policies be any different?

Once again you break down a SEEMINGLY complex topic and show it’s not complex at all. It only seems that way because that’s a typical tactic Jews use to cover their tracks. They make you feel both crazy (that can’t be true!) and stupid (I guess I’m just not smart enough to figure this out). We see it in: The Holocaust, Wall Street derivatives, and the Einstein cult.

(I’m not a physicist. But I know the fruit of hard fought labor when I see it. Poincaré and Lorentz worked for more than a decade on that thing. Combine that with the fact that Einstein behaved exactly like you’d expect a plagiarist to behave and the case is open and shut as far as I’m concerned.)

This parallels my own left-right experience. I was a right-winger as a young man. Then I moved to the left when I saw to my horror that every nasty accusation made against Ronald Reagan turned out to be true. On the right people didn’t care for my brown skin (among other things). On the left there was a problem because I actually believed in equality of opportunity. I didn’t know it was just an excuse to hate White people. And I wasn’t allowed into a Trotskyite party – wsws.org – because I balked at accepting philosophical materialism.

(Notice how they refuse to NAME THE JEW.)

So as you say, there’s actually very good evidence, for example, that Socialism actually works splendidly. You’re basically looking at a scale-free (social) network; with elites clustering around the major hubs.

But while inherently stable, scale-free networks are easy pickings for a cadre of parasites like the Jews. And the scale-free network call Socialism will only work if White people dominate it and run it. Mostly because they’re the only ones who inherit the crazy notion that you’re actually supposed to pull your own weight!

I think many whites support small ‘s’ socialism and small ‘c’ capitalism. What they get instead is large scale globalised socialism and large scale monopoly capitalism. All the power is taken by the centre and YKW tends to be at that centre.

Here is an excerpt from “Le Testament d’un Antisémite”, published in 1891 by the French author ÉdouardDrumont. He was already explaining at that time that the right-left divide was largely phony and Jewish. In that excerpt, those he calls “the Republicans” are the left-wing politicians who claim to be upholding the ideals of the 1789 revolution. I guess many people in Drumont’s time were still royalists. My translation :

For the last twenty years we have been living with the idea that there were two parties ; on the one hand, the true French: honest, generous, loving the greatness of their country ; on the other hand, exploiters, cynical Republicans, brazen tricksters, who persecute and oppress the real honest Frenchmen. Many naive people gave a lot of themselves during those twenty years, fought with all their strength, prayed with all their soul in the hope that at some point, that always seemed more imminent, the Right that represented the real honest Frenchmen would finally defeat the Left, that seemed to personify all infamies.

That conception is way off the mark. In reality there are not two political parties, there is a general scheme, there is a system, the capitalist and Jewish system that the representatives of political parties vying for power are equally affiliated with. The Republicans, more greedy because they work harder at it, may seek more immediate rewards from that system ; they may show more harshness and impudence, but the Conservatives are attached to that system as much as the Republicans : they may have a greater interest than the Republicans in ensuring its continuation and they expect that no one will interfere with it.

I like how Drumont explains that a lot of energy is wasted when honest people think that the problem comes from the perverts on the left, from the liberals. I like how he presents the self-styled right-wing politicians as largely a cynical false opposition. That’s why we have to tell people about the crucial part played by the Jews, especially in our age of race-replacement. That information should have wide implications on the tactics used by White Nationalists. We have wasted too much time bashing the liberals. It is crucial to tell everyone that the system is rigged at the top, mainly by the Jews.