Am I the only one who's not impressed by this? I didn't think she'd be one to pose nude, honestly.

Click to expand...

I think posing nude for a charity like this (it's basically United Way, right? Hugely respected international charity), and posing nude for a fashion magazine, or a men's magazine are very different things.

I have no idea what she did, but it's very possible she wasn't actually fully nude, as the important parts are covered, so they may have been covered for the shot too. If any of that covering showed, photoshop can fix it.

There is absolutely nothing "shocking" or "racy" about this at all . . . likewise with Meier's shoot. They both look at ease with themselves and very naturally beautiful, unlike Lysacek's "I feel violated and uncomfortable" expression in his semi-nude shoot. If I were a woman and looked like Joannie or Sarah, I would go au natural all the time, baby!

I think posing nude for a charity like this (it's basically United Way, right? Hugely respected international charity), and posing nude for a fashion magazine, or a men's magazine are very different things.

I have no idea what she did, but it's very possible she wasn't actually fully nude, as the important parts are covered, so they may have been covered for the shot too. If any of that covering showed, photoshop can fix it.

Click to expand...

Yes, when you are posing nude for charity, it maks all the difference in the world, lol!