house Bill H. Res. 1149

Should the House Emphasize the Importance of the U.S.-South Korea Alliance?

Argument in favor

The U.S.-South Korea alliance has been a bulwark for regional peace and stability, while exemplifying democratic values, free market principles, and a commitment to universal human rights. The House should send a message to the world by formally emphasizing the importance of the relationship.

By all means yes..... I’m in full support of the resolution which would recognize that the U.S.-South Korea alliance serves as a linchpin of regional and bilateral security that’s exemplified by deep diplomatic, economic, military, and cultural ties between the two republics. It would also emphasize that beyond regional peace and security the alliance is of extreme importance and should be passed. SneakyPete..... 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻. 12*4*18........

We should emphasize the importance of our alliances with all allies, rather than the dictatorships that Trump loves so much.

Like
(2)

Follow

Share

Argument opposed

While the U.S.-South Korea alliance has many benefits for both sides that deserve broader acknowledgment, that relationship isn’t going to get significantly better with the passage of this non-binding bill. Congress should focus on legislation that has a bigger impact.

Feel good fluff that doesn’t do anything. This “legislation” doesn’t change anything, propose anything, or accomplish anything. It’s a total waste of time. We have treaties to define our relationships with countries. Do something that matters. Address immigration, climate change, the budget. DO SOMETHING USEFUL.

Bill Data

What is House Bill H. Res. 1149?

This resolution would recognize that the U.S.-South Korea alliance serves as a linchpin of regional and bilateral security that’s exemplified by deep diplomatic, economic, military, and cultural ties between the two republics. It would also emphasize that beyond regional peace and security the alliance is an exemplar of democratic values, free market principles, commitment to universal human rights, and the rule of law. Additionally, it would reaffirm that the U.S. will stand shoulder-to-shoulder with South Korea regardless of the outcome of any negotiations with North Korea and will continue applying the pressure needed to peacefully end the rogue nation’s nuclear weapons program.

As a simple resolution, this legislation is non-binding and wouldn’t advance beyond the House if passed.

Impact

The House of Representatives; and South Korea.

Cost of House Bill H. Res. 1149

A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.

More Information

In-Depth: This legislation was introduced by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) with the support of three cosponsors, Reps. Sam Johnson (R-TX), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), and Ted Yoho (R-FL).

Official Title

Recognizing that the United States-Republic of Korea alliance serves as a linchpin of regional stability and bilateral security, and exemplifies the broad and deep military, diplomatic, economic, and cultural ties shared between the United States and the Republic of Korea.

By all means yes..... I’m in full support of the resolution which would recognize that the U.S.-South Korea alliance serves as a linchpin of regional and bilateral security that’s exemplified by deep diplomatic, economic, military, and cultural ties between the two republics. It would also emphasize that beyond regional peace and security the alliance is of extreme importance and should be passed. SneakyPete..... 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻. 12*4*18........

Feel good fluff that doesn’t do anything. This “legislation” doesn’t change anything, propose anything, or accomplish anything. It’s a total waste of time. We have treaties to define our relationships with countries. Do something that matters. Address immigration, climate change, the budget. DO SOMETHING USEFUL.

Anything that would slow down President Trump's " friendship" with the tyrannical regime in North Korea is a good thing. Why does the President embrace anti- American tyrannies all over the world, and insult our allies and trading partners?

Though the resolution is non-binding, it is important for the U.S. to show to S. Korea that we still back them. The president AS USUAL complains about the amount of money the U.S. spends protecting S. Korea, not understanding that our support gives stability to the whole region, not only S. Korea. Trump is an isolationist, and can't see farther down the road than his next rally. Cooperation provides safety, and the Congress making this statement is important, because the president constantly undermines U.S. positions. It is his narrow view that he promotes, and that isn't what's best for the nation. Of course, despite his rhetoric, he is not a patriot, but a businessman in a president's suit -- he does not look out for the country's position in the world .... only "America First," which in the long run, is going to be America last, without our allies.

Feel good fluff that doesn’t do anything. This “legislation” doesn’t change anything, propose anything, or accomplish anything. It’s a total waste of time. We have treaties to define our relationships with countries. Do something that matters. Address immigration, climate change, the budget. DO SOMETHING USEFUL.