Friday, May 16, 2014

The Active Process of Aging in Place

America’s older population is poised for
unprecedented growth. The youngest members of the baby boom population, born
1946-1964, have turned 50, while the oldest boomers have crossed the 65 threshold.
Growth among 65-74 year olds is set to soar, climbing from 22 million in 2010
to an estimated 39 million by 2030, a 78 percent jump. By 2040, there will be
an estimated 30 million 75-84 year olds, and another 14 million people 85 or
over.

The vast majority of older adults currently
live independently. This is true even among the oldest group: of those aged 85
and above, 72 percent live by themselves or with a spouse/partner in their own
homes, according to the 2012 American Community Survey. With evidence that Americans
of all ages are moving less, and given health care improvements that have delayed
moves to institutional care, the trend toward independent living in older age
is very likely to continue.

Indeed, surveys show that most
people want to live independently in
their current homes and communities as they age—a preference popularly called “aging
in place.” In a 2010 survey of 1,600 people over aged 45, AARP found that 86 percent somewhat
or strongly agreed with the statement “What I’d really like to do is stay in my
current residence for as long as possible,” while 85 percent somewhat or strongly
agreed “What I’d really like to do is remain in my local community for as long
as possible.” A 2014 online poll by the American Planning
Association found that 69 percent of 50-65 year old respondents with at least
two years of college reported that staying in their homes as they got older was
somewhat, very, or extremely important.

The Center
for Disease Control
defines aging in place as “the ability to live in one’s own home and
community safely, independently, and comfortably, regardless of age, income, or
ability level.” The CDC’s focus on aging in place as an “ability” is on point: because
abilities may change over time, the definition hints at the dynamic nature of
aging in place, rather than the absence of action and change regarding one’s
living environment. The reality is that, for many, aging in place is a
deliberate and dynamic process, one best undertaken with preparation including
adaptations of physical space, modes of transportation, or other facets of life
in advance of physical or cognitive need to do so. For some, it may even
involve moving in order to set the
stage to live independently for as long as possible, relocating to a new home
that is more comfortable, safe, affordable, and/or convenient. Moves may be
within the current community – preserving existing social connections – or
outside to locations where changing needs can be better accommodated either
because of more community resources or proximity to family.

And even with
preparation, aging in place is an ongoing process
(as literature from the field of gerontology recognizes) in
which older residents renegotiate how, and indeed if, they continue to stay in
their current home as their preferences and circumstances (health, finances,
relationships and family and social supports) shift over time.

The CDC mentions the
ability to remain in one’s community
as well, and indeed a critical part of aging in place is the setting in which
it occurs. Many researchers, advocates, and commentators point to the same list
of elements needed to make communities more livable for all ages, including
older adults: affordable, secure,
and physically accessible housing; and affordable, safe, and reliable
transportation alternatives for those who are unable or choose not to drive
(such as mass transit, paratransit, and safe and desirable walking routes to
services and amenities). Opportunities for older residents to engage with their
communities in recreational, learning, cultural, volunteering, and/or social
experiences, and options for in-home health care and/or assistance with
activities of daily life as circumstances change are also critical.

Yet there are tremendous
challenges in ensuring that our houses and communities are ready to support a high
quality of life for older adults aging in place now, and the growing numbers of
those who will do so in the future. Needs include more accessible housing units
for those with ambulatory difficulties; a larger range of housing options for
those seeking smaller, more affordable units; improved infrastructure to promote
pedestrian safety; transportation alternatives to private cars; and local
services to assist older adults with home maintenance, care, and meals. The
federal government has a role too, in providing financing options to help
homeowners and renters modify their homes to improve safety and accessibility, supporting
the growing number of low-income senior renters, and in improving collaboration
between health and housing programs to ensure they are mutually supportive of
aging in place.

There is much to be done to provide the needed supports for today’s older population and the coming waves of older adults engaged in the dynamic process of aging in place. A first step is for individuals to recognize the value of planning in anticipation of future needs, and for government at all levels to recognize the magnitude and importance of the challenges and opportunities associated with an aging population seeking to age in their communities. The next step is to take stock of what we already know about the best way to support aging in place and to consider how the public, nonprofit, and private sectors can innovate and bring solutions to scale.

To help spur and inform this important discussion, the Joint Center for Housing Studies and the AARP Foundation will release a comprehensive report on this topic this fall.Housing America's Older Adults: Meeting the Needs of an Aging Population will be released at an event in Washington, DC on September 2, 2014.Join our mailing list to receive more information this summer.

No comments:

Post a Comment

About

Drawing from the ongoing research and analysis of the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies, Housing Perspectives provides timely insight into current trends and key issues in housing. We dig deeper into the housing headlines to discuss critical issues and trends in housing, community development, global urbanism, and sustainability. Posts are written by staff of the Joint Center, drawing from their wide-ranging knowledge and experience studying housing. We hope you will follow Housing Perspectives, and we welcome your comments.

The opinions expressed in Housing Perspectives do not necessarily represent the views of Harvard University, the Policy Advisory Board of the Joint Center for Housing Studies, or any other sponsoring agency. The Joint Center welcomes comments to our Housing Perspectives blog. Any opinions expressed in posted comments, or in guest blogs, are those of the authors and not those of the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University or of any of the persons or organizations providing support to the Joint Center for Housing Studies. Comments are generally not edited but are reviewed for appropriateness, and normally post within a day. The Joint Center reserves the right to delete or decline to post comments that are off-topic, illegal, or otherwise objectionable or injurious. Commenters are fully responsible for the content they submit, and indemnify Harvard University and the Joint Center for Housing Studies against any losses, damages, or costs resulting from any claim relating to material they have posted. We require commenters to sign their comments with their real names. All comments and postings are the property of the Joint Center and may be used by the Joint Center at its discretion.