Career Summary

MLB Statistics

Historical (past-seasons) WARP is now based on DRA..
cFIP and DRA are not available on a by-team basis and display as zeroes(0). See TOT line for season totals of these stats.Multiple stints are are currently shown —Click to hide.

YEAR

Team

Lg

G

GS

IP

W

L

SV

H

BB

SO

HR

oppTAv

PPF

H/9

BB/9

HR/9

K/9

GB%

BABIP

TAv

WHIP

FIP

ERA

cFIP

DRA

DRA-

WARP

1980

CHN

MLB

18

0

21.7

2

0

0

21

14

17

0

.255

109

8.7

5.8

0.0

7.1

60%

.318

.255

1.62

3.11

2.91

96

4.03

93.9

0.1

1981

CHN

MLB

40

1

66.7

3

6

1

57

31

50

2

.255

108

7.7

4.2

0.3

6.8

59%

.279

.239

1.32

3.00

3.51

86

3.48

87.1

0.7

1982

CHN

MLB

72

5

117.0

2

5

17

105

37

99

5

.257

105

8.1

2.8

0.4

7.6

56%

.298

.227

1.21

2.63

2.69

70

3.56

82.7

1.7

1983

CHN

MLB

66

0

103.3

4

10

29

70

41

91

5

.259

106

6.1

3.6

0.4

7.9

50%

.236

.201

1.07

2.75

1.65

74

3.94

90.9

1.0

1984

CHN

MLB

69

0

101.0

9

7

33

98

35

86

6

.259

105

8.7

3.1

0.5

7.7

48%

.306

.237

1.32

2.90

3.65

79

3.56

83.3

1.4

1985

CHN

MLB

65

0

97.7

7

4

33

87

32

112

9

.259

106

8.0

2.9

0.8

10.3

51%

.321

.233

1.22

2.53

3.04

51

2.55

58.5

2.7

1986

CHN

MLB

66

0

90.3

9

9

31

69

42

93

7

.263

110

6.9

4.2

0.7

9.3

47%

.270

.224

1.23

3.08

3.09

76

4.32

97.5

0.7

1987

CHN

MLB

62

0

83.7

4

10

36

84

32

96

4

.262

105

9.0

3.4

0.4

10.3

54%

.351

.229

1.39

2.33

3.12

59

2.71

56.9

2.4

1988

BOS

MLB

64

0

83.7

4

5

29

72

37

96

7

.268

104

7.7

4.0

0.8

10.3

41%

.293

.250

1.30

2.97

2.80

73

3.07

73.9

1.7

1989

BOS

MLB

64

0

70.7

6

1

25

53

33

96

6

.264

110

6.8

4.2

0.8

12.2

35%

.303

.221

1.22

2.63

3.57

62

2.91

70.0

1.5

1990

BOS

0

11

0

14.3

2

1

4

13

9

17

0

.258

108

8.2

5.7

0.0

10.7

42%

.342

.243

1.53

2.31

1.88

69

2.70

62.9

0.4

1990

SLN

0

53

0

68.7

3

4

27

58

20

70

3

.266

98

7.6

2.6

0.4

9.2

35%

.294

.226

1.14

2.21

2.10

71

2.85

66.4

1.7

1991

SLN

MLB

67

0

73.0

6

3

47

70

13

67

5

.258

98

8.6

1.6

0.6

8.3

38%

.302

.234

1.14

2.38

2.34

75

3.06

70.9

1.6

1992

SLN

MLB

70

0

75.0

4

9

43

62

26

60

4

.260

98

7.4

3.1

0.5

7.2

36%

.264

.229

1.17

2.90

3.12

89

3.48

84.3

1.1

1993

NYA

0

8

0

8.0

0

0

3

4

5

11

0

.261

99

4.5

5.6

0.0

12.4

47%

.235

.191

1.12

2.11

0.00

75

2.54

54.9

0.2

1993

SLN

0

55

0

50.0

2

4

43

49

9

49

11

.260

99

8.8

1.6

2.0

8.8

34%

.277

.259

1.16

4.41

4.50

77

3.32

71.6

1.1

1994

BAL

MLB

41

0

38.3

1

4

33

34

11

42

6

.260

99

8.0

2.6

1.4

9.9

50%

.277

.244

1.17

3.90

3.29

75

2.68

54.1

1.2

1995

CAL

MLB

52

0

49.3

0

5

37

42

25

43

3

.265

99

7.7

4.6

0.5

7.8

43%

.285

.247

1.36

3.76

3.47

95

4.23

86.6

0.6

1996

CAL

0

11

0

11.0

0

0

0

8

3

6

0

.265

98

6.5

2.5

0.0

4.9

31%

.229

.191

1.00

2.97

2.45

107

5.08

100.4

0.1

1996

CIN

0

43

0

44.3

3

4

2

49

23

35

4

.254

100

9.9

4.7

0.8

7.1

48%

.326

.268

1.62

4.30

4.06

107

5.36

105.8

0.1

1997

MON

MLB

25

0

21.7

0

1

5

28

8

15

2

.253

102

11.6

3.3

0.8

6.2

53%

.351

.285

1.66

4.13

5.82

100

4.74

98.6

0.1

1990

TOT

MLB

64

0

83.0

5

5

31

71

29

87

3

.265

100

7.7

3.1

0.3

9.4

36%

.302

.229

1.20

2.22

2.06

70

2.82

65.8

2.0

1993

TOT

MLB

63

0

58.0

2

4

46

53

14

60

11

.260

99

8.2

2.2

1.7

9.3

35%

.273

.250

1.16

4.09

3.88

76

3.21

69.3

1.3

1996

TOT

MLB

54

0

55.3

3

4

2

57

26

41

4

.256

99

9.3

4.2

0.7

6.7

45%

.306

.254

1.50

4.04

3.74

107

5.31

104.7

0.2

Career

MLB

1022

6

1289.3

71

92

478

1133

486

1251

89

.260

104

7.9

3.4

0.6

8.7

46%

.294

.234

1.26

2.92

3.03

75

3.45

78.3

22.3

Statistics for All Levels

'opp' stats - Quality of opponents faced - have been moved and are available only as OPP_QUAL in the Statistics reports now.Minor league stats are currently shown —Click to hide.

BP Chats

Jay - I've enjoyed watching you on the MLB network this week along with your coulumns, which are always great.
What do you think of Trevor Hoffman's chances especially with the way most of the sabermetric community feels about the save statistic. Thanks(sarsfield from San Diego, California)

To me, Hoffman looks a lot like Lee Smith, who held the all-time saves lead for awhile before being overtaken - a guy with an impressive save total but not above-average value relative to the already-enshrined relievers, even with Bruce Sutter weighing that group down. (Jay Jaffe on the Hall of Fame)

Why does everybody feel that Delin Betances should be in the bullpen? With his size, he could be a huge innings eaater and that is more valuable than a short reliever.(Winston Diclmeister from Providence, RI)

Long injury history, not the cleanest delivery, an arsenal that fits in the late innings, inefficiency and other reasons. Based on your size logic, Lee Smith should have started (he should not of). (Kevin Goldstein)

And the winner is... Barry Larkin with 86.4 percent of the vote, the only player elected this year as expected. Some big surprises, good and bad, among the next wave. Jack Morris at 66.7 percent has put himself in good position to get over the top despite the crowd, Jeff Bagwell at 56.0 percent made a solid advance in the face of an odious whisper campaign, Lee Smith got to 50.6 percent, Tim Raines is very close to that mark at 48.7 percent, and even Alan Trammell posted a solid gain at 36.8 percent. Hell, Bernie Williams got 9.6 percent and stays on the ballot after all. (Jay Jaffe's Hall of Fame Special)

Other than Blyleven, which pitchers do you feel are/were snubbed for the Hall? Morris? The various relievers? Someone I'm missing? (strupp from madison)

Wes Ferrell's got a good case as far as the Vet Committee goes. Lee Smith has a decent case among the relievers. Morris didn't come close to preventing enough runs to merit further consideration.

The real cases that get me going are among the non-300 winners upcoming, the aforementioned Smoltz, Schilling, Mussina, Martinez contingent. I think all of them should be in when the time comes, but I'm not sure the electorate will see it that way. (Jay Jaffe)