-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> Stephan Richter wrote:
>> On Friday 17 November 2006 03:43, Chris Withers wrote:
>>> What do you suggest I do when the adapter needs to know the name it was
>>> registered for?
>> You can make the name part of the adapter API.
>
> Not sure what you mean by this?
>
>> However, I would suggest revising the design; I have never come across a
>> scenario where I wanted the name of the adapter be known within the adapter.
>> This seems to be a recipe for trouble.
>
> I don't think it'll be a common pattern, but it doesn't feel right to me
> that a named adapter (ie: one registered with a specific name) has no
> way of finding out what name it has been registered with...