Tuesday, September 13, 2016

It is clear that the coastal and border regions of the United States, home to our largest cities and power centers, seem destined to become solidly non-white, leaving a large but relatively sparse—and therefore colonially vulnerable—interior region as the only place with a large White majority. The United States is reverting to a colonial society, one of foreign cities and a disconnected indigenous countryside. We’ve become the Indians.

This is a problem. Cities are the focal points of social and financial mobility in the United States, centers of political power, and where high status is conferred upon people, something normies crave. That we are becoming physically and culturally excluded from this world I think is a net negative, despite much of the alt-right’s hostility to urban life. Indeed, how much of that hostility is an indictment of the demographics of cities and their derived politics rather than of the physical spaces of the cities themselves? Our situation is a perverse one, one in which our cities are foreign to us even though urbanization is an integral part of modernity.

The idea that we can abandon our own cities for farther and farther away suburbs, a phenomenon which has been going on for decades, is one whose time is going to be cut short sooner or later by the simple reality that ordinary people cannot afford to move away from jobs. Not to mention that we will run out of land eventually. At this point it is a game of chicken with (((international financial capitalism))) to see whose rotten undergirding falls out first—do the cities collapse under their own dead weight as a result of our flight and replacement with net tax-consuming vibrants, or do we become impoverished in the long-run as a result of unplugging ourselves from “where the money is”?

For the foreseeable future, we will continue to have a racially-driven reverse movement of people out of cities into the hinterland. Traditionally, cities were grown from the countryside as people migrated to them in search of opportunity and employment. Our ongoing revolt against the flow of history does not stop urbanization, however. Instead of our own countryside fueling the growth of our cities, it is migration from the global south, which exacerbates White flight further. Is there really any good reason why unemployed or underemployed native English speakers from say, the Rust Belt, couldn’t be encouraged to move to our cities for work? Why instead import what are largely foreign functional illiterates?

The so-called global city is really just a third world colony in the White world. Colonization is not just a metaphor for the current state of affairs, it is the reality of them. How did European colonists live outside of Europe during our high tide? They lived in and built fortified cities and ports in foreign lands where they were a minority. Today it has been reversed; we are the ones living beyond the Pale, watching ivory towers filled with ebony rise in our conquered capitals.

The loss of our own cities is unique problem of the White world, the sort of thing Stoddard warned us would happen if we yielded the outer dikes without shoring up the inner dikes. A Japanese city is Japanese. A Mexican city is Mexican. An Indian city is Indian. A Chinese city is Chinese. It is only in Europe and the Anglo satellites where you have this phenomenon of cities being not just slightly divergent from the general population but foreign to it. New York, for example, is not an Anglo-American city, but an Israeli-Puerto Rican-Chinese-Pakistani-Ecuadorian-Mexican-Filipino-Dominican-African-Korean city. Paris is not a French city, but an Algerian-Moroccan-Portuguese-Senegalese-Vietnamese-Malian city. London is not a British city, but an Indian-Pakistani-Jamaican-Polish-Bengali-Arab-Chinese-Nigerian city. It will pose a geopolitical problem in the future, that metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties in the same country are different races from one another. Indeed, there can be no harmony in a country where the centers of power and economic life are radically different from the wider society—the ancient tension between urban and rural will only be exacerbated further.

Of course, the situation can, and most likely will, be reversed in time. The tragic thing is that it will not be reversed easily, or most likely, peacefully. This is why the great military historian Martin van Creveld, when asked if migration caused war or war caused migration, answered: "there is no difference, migration is war."

132 Comments:

There is this secondary psychological effect that comes with the loss of cities, when you visit the hinterlands: you expect at least those places to be clean -- therefore it is acutely unpleasant to see a non-White there. You're accustomed to seeing them in overdeveloped coastal areas and they are just part of the ugly backdrop that you treat as normal.

But when you see a Dindu working in a little Appalachian town grocery store or a cluster of headscarved women in a park in a small Indiana town, it's unsettling and it really pisses you off.

/The Amish are famous for being a group of people with a sustainable economy, self sufficient, full employment, strict nepotism and for wanting to leave an inheritance to their posterity.

everything sane. An Island of sanity. The film, The Fugitive, gave them a stark relief clash of civilizations look.

The West is certainly in a spiral dive. What will arrest that dive? Personally I think the West last minute struggle for survival should pivot solely around 'worship'. The Amish are sane because of worship. Sanity, truth, justice and the american way is an isolated pocket of Pennsylvania. It's a cultural thing. Someone will get it.

Followed a link recently (from here or Heartiste) that posited something to the effect that history can be described as a succession of negotiations over land and women; and we're currently losing the negotiations.

"But when you see a Dindu working in a little Appalachian town grocery store or a cluster of headscarved women in a park in a small Indiana town, it's unsettling and it really pisses you off."

I've gone out with my girlfriend a few times and it never ceases to piss me off how many Muslims we have in my city (not going to say which one but it's a capital of a Midwest state). I hope the elites' 30 pieces of silver was worth it.

> Of course, the situation can, and most likely will, be reversed in time.

Since the people currently in the our cities can (largely, it's not universal) neither build nor maintain them, it's only a matter of time. Detroit is the future of cities in America.

Nor is their being the economic centers they have been a given. Again, see Detroit. That was a vestige of the Industrial Age. Factories, access to shipping, and communications were all in the cities. Shipping and communications are no longer the barriers they once were, and we've abandoned our factories.

Besides, we built those cities; we can build new ones if we want them.

> But when you see a Dindu working in a little Appalachian town grocery store or a cluster of headscarved women in a park in a small Indiana town, it's unsettling and it really pisses you off.

I was driving east on route 7 in Virginia between Winchester and Leesburg a few weeks ago. I passed a bunch of signs in Spanish. That was pretty much my reaction.

I think the fellow that wrote this is overlooking that it is only the whites and their institutions that make cities rich. These people have no skills as a population regardless how many you cram together. Once native whites leave a city, those left behind can't run them no matter how much they try.

As the lines of supplying the cities grow longer and more brittle, cities are now open air prisons where the inmates are volunteers.

This author sees cities in their historical context, not as what they've become. As Chicago's ghettos move toward open chaos, police are drawn from North Lake Shore Drive, Wrigleyville and other places that WERE relatively safe. So what happens? Squeeze Englewood, the Jello squirts to the unprotected areas. This is the modern city. Detroit and Baltimore are simply further along the modern city timeline.

The appearance of power found in cities is an apex symptom of the Credit Bubble. When monetary wealth can be created by borrowing & issuing a bond, centers where that's the main business will of course appear rich and powerful. The key word here is "appear."

Whites (actually White males) are in this position only because they (we) acquiesce to it...under this absurd ethos of the Equals Temple Cult.

Anti-racism, Feminism and LGBTblahblahblah exist only because white men go along with the gag. I still think our willingness to do so is on borrowed time, and that the Narrative of the Alt-Right (which boils down to an unwillingness to accept the lies of the cult) is the seed of a coming Dominant Fashion.

The heterogeneity of "white" tribes in the USA works against us, but I still think it's primarily this absurd social mood mania that powers the acquiescence and that when the mania finally ends, so too will this idiotic consent.

Wife and I were watching season 2 of Narcos and she commented that she never hears anyone take pride in their hometown/city. The Columbians in the show are constantly referring to their love of their city Medellin. I reflected on this and can only recall people bashing their hometown, and I usually get weird feelings of awkwardness if I see anything praising the hometown. I don't know what to conclude from this but I can't recall ever observing people take pride in their city, only in their home team or school. Maybe it's because most of us have to leave the home town to find work? How many people live and work in the same city now?

@18Erynne, I think the lack of pride in your own town has a lot to do with the destruction of local communities. It's easier for poorer towns to form communities because perhaps the television and computer doesn't keep everyone locked inside their own houses. Of course it also has to do with the indoctrination against whites taking pride in anything that's their own.

"But when you see a Dindu working in a little Appalachian town grocery store..."

Who's ever seen a dindu "working"?

Has there ever before been a civilization which was self-destroyed because they were afraid of being called a naughty name? Hell, even the Nazis were content to be called "Nazis". As the guy in the ancient video game said, This is UNREAL!

@23 - Community has died not just due to technology, but due to the fact that economically, we split the family. The jobs are in the cities, but the cities suck for raising a family. So the family moved to the suburbs, the kids move to the city, and then they move to a different suburb at a different city. Rinse repeat.

Growing up north of Detroit and now living on the north side of Chicago I do see the patterns. Coleman Young set the downward spiral in motion during his twenty years in office. He was followed by black mayors for twenty years after of varying quality but none suited to stop the destructive machine Coleman had created. I only rarely went into the city when I lived there. I remember hearing of major businesses closing shop and moving to other states, the continual shrinking of the population as the suburbs grew. City taxes were ridiculous and I had jobs involving City income taxes. After 40 years, there is a white mayor again. Residents have been told the police can't protect them and to arm themselves. Don't know how much else is starting to change, but I think Detroit has hit bottom and started to rise. That is of course until the waves of Middle Eastern refugees spread into the city from the Hamtramck and Dearborn.

Now in Chicago, I have lived two barrios (Spanish signage, stores where no one speaks English). Taxes have gone up as I have been here, property taxes continue to rise as do housing prices. Municipal retirees continue to have the courts behind them, enforcing the pledges of pensions that are absurd on their face... but what the politicians promised them for their vote. If Detroit is anything to judge by, Chicago has an interesting half century coming up.

>Of course, the situation can, and most likely will, be reversed in time.

Certainly the case in Seattle. Every other article bemoans the total gentrification of the city at the hands of evil white tech workers (they always fail to mention the numerous Indian tech workers). Apparently Seattle is shedding diversity while growing - a great, great evil.

I grew up in a small town in the Midwest. I loved it, and was taught that cities are evil beds of wickedness. Our town was still burning witches in the 1970s. It hasn't been all that long ago, people. What once was may be again. We just have to be willing to do the unpleasant but necessary work to make it so.

I've seen women in full burkas grocery shopping where I live now. I tell them 'Only thieves and killers hide their faces. Which one are you?'

To the people I hear speaking Spanish in the stores, I say, "This is America. We speak English here."

The time for being polite and once is over. Be unpleasant and rude now, or be murderous later. These are the only options remaining if we want our nation to survive. Personally, I think the bloodletting is inevitable at this point, but I admit I may be mistaken.

Perhaps Donald Trump can hear the cry of the alt-right and seize the American flag in his tan-bronzed fist. Then act to reverse 1965. I wrote an article on the four levers of power he would have to seize at my website, qedbook.wordpress.com; scroll down to the glowing picture of Trump with the sinister light coming out of his eyes.

On any given day, if I'm out for any given reason (gym, grocery store, doctor, etc.), I'm always in the minority. At the more expensive grocery store, there may be a plurality of Whites. Early in the morning, those who venture to WalMart are largely White. Any time of the day I go to the produce store or gym, I'm outnumbered 10 to 1. Chinese, various Indian dialects, Spanish, Arabic, Farsi, and dindu. This is in a suburban city of DFW, and it's why, although I detest Jeff Bezos and Amazon, I do as much as possible online. Add this to all the years I lived overseas, and the memory of living in a majority White American environment is merely that - a dim and fading memory.

@13As the lines of supplying the cities grow longer and more brittle, cities are now open air prisons where the inmates are volunteers.

Interesting then that Affirmative Fair Housing is moving the inmates elsewhere. Chicago demolished the Taylor Estates and moved the black people to other areas, including the suburbs. The very nice high rises that went up there were supposed to reserve some number of apartments for low income, not sure how that's worked out.

Obama's housing administration has decided to punish Dubuque, Iowa, for foot dragging; they aren't taking former Chicago inmates into their fair city fast enough. So it's not just spreading the wealth around, it's spreading the wealth-eaters around also.

Yes, it does remind one of Rome. The capitol became less Roman and more Empire, the patrician class removed themselves to country estates and entire ordinary families wound up selling themselves into slavery to pay off their tax burden to the state.

Much of the "wealth" that the coastal areas have amassed is credit in a slightly different form. When the financial machine stops, we'll see how what wealth really is.

This was a common situation in areas of Europe that were under Muslim rule. The cities were often full of muslims and jews, while the countryside was christian. The Christians who lived in the city were often outsiders, such as genoese or venetians who were primarily there to make money.

rotten undergirding falls out first—do the cities collapse under their own dead weight as a result of our flight and replacement with net tax

Cut off the power to any die verse city and there will be looting in seconds. Do it before the food stamp cards recharge and groids will be cannibalizing white liberals living near them in days. We are literally bringing in 3rd world moslems who lived in huts and giving them $60,000 a year in AIDS meds plus section 8, welfare, food stamps and benefits even Americans can't get. The boston marathon moslems got a grant to buy a car.

It's as though whites have the worst race (((traitors)))). FIFY

their institutions that make cities rich. These people have no skills as a population regardless how many you cram together.

The best businesses become liquor stores, payday loans for govt workers, and corner groceries that give $20 for $50 worth of food stamp charge.

Sorry-you guys lose. Have fun fuming on the internet and raging in your echo chamber.

Have fun when your adult neighbors with less mental capacity than a white 10yo finds their food stamp gibsmedat card doesn't work. Maybe if you wear your BLM shirt the semi literate ones will eat you last.

Dindu working in a little Appalachian town grocery store..." Who's ever seen a dindu "working"?

Standing around getting paid? I worked with one didndu for 3 years, the only time he appeared to be working he was actually breaking the HIPAA law over a groid patient of mine shot dead by the cops the week before. He would literally just walk around and do nothing. He even made a scene saying the x-rays proved the cops lied, he couldn't understand bullets move around in the body. He was not fired, the same body that determines if you have enough evidence to get away with firing a nigger is the same that evaluates HIPAA law violations. Bastard even thought the felon was shot on his way to church when he was dead before 3am

The Lizard Queen's insult about "deplorable" reminded me of Kaiser Bill Two calling the British Army remnant "contemptible" in 1914. The BEF at that point was almost extinct. But they took the insult as their own, calling themselves the Old Contemptibles. I feel I've been taking incoming artillery since at least 1980. But,like the British Expeditionary Force, if we hold on and get like-minded reinforcements, in four years the Hun may be on the run!

There's even a pub in Birmingham, UK, called the Old Contemptibles. Maybe we can found one called the Immortal Deplorables.

What Murray has described is a de facto partition. Conflict will arise with the remnant white populations in the large cities/coastal areas and the migration of other races into the hinterlands. AFFH and the initially stealth resettlement of Muslims and illegals into the interior probably will force the issue. Based on some comments above, this already is a problem. When the numbers get right, all but the wealthiest white urban dwellers will be pushed out. Given those in the "gentrified" urban neighborhoods tend to be effeminate males and SJW chicks, don't expect much push back there.

Washington D.C., the nation's capital, isn't an American city. I can easily go the entire day running about my neighborhood and environs, shopping, doing errands, dining, and never encounter another American or even English being spoken. I have shops along my main drag that I can't tell what they do. They signs aren't spelled out in the Latin alphabet.

Woodbridge, Virginia used to be a white, blue-collar bedroom community outside the Beltway. We call it Hoodbridge now, the poor and immigrant population has exploded. Nevertheless developers wanted to build a "luxury" housing development there. That's Hoodbridge "luxury", not to be confused with places like Great Falls, VA or Potomac, MD where you have to plunk down millions. But it had the word "luxury" in the conceptual pitch -- so the thinking among bureaucrats was "white". You should have seen the fiasco that resulted when they tried to zone the new school they were building to support the new homes. The school zoning was rejected by the feds SEVEN times. Not die-verse enough for them, even though not a single home in the new "luxury" development had been sold or even built yet.

They can't stomach public schools that are "too white". Of course, down the highway where I live in a formerly lilly-white neighborhood, we have maybe 5-7% white anymore. Even fewer American blacks. We have kids in there from all points of the globe, more from Bolivians or Koreans than Virginians. But that doesn't bother them, that's seen as an organic achievement in die-versity and a unequivocal good. But you can't have too many whites moving in on Hoodbridge! Last year the wonderful SCOTUS approved the goal of Obama to empower HUD to apply die-versity and social justice measures on community housing efforts and planning. What a show -- this anti-white crap is increasing codified. And that's all it is, too. Anti-white crap.

A couple weeks ago I was driving through Roanoke, VA and stopped for gas. A van full of Muslims and their hijabed women pulled up next to me. Depressing. Kebabs come to Roanoke. The next day Roanoke experienced its first jihad when a kebab took up a knife and started Allahu Akbaring random people.

And it's true, out in the country near there where we have the family farm, everybody is buying ammo.

@39Yes, women are always the answer to life's problems. Surprised you didn't recommend everyone open their homes to refugees to avoid loneliness.

Just remember, the only thing guaranteed in life is change whether you like it or not. And when Big Gov starts to run out of money, they will have no problems shutting off the spigot to the undesirables (you) since they also will not need your vote anymore. They will be running full on autopilot/bureaucracy.

Taxes have gone up as I have been here, property taxes continue to rise as do housing prices. Municipal retirees continue to have the courts behind them, enforcing the pledges of pensions that are absurd on their face... but what the politicians promised them for their vote. If Detroit is anything to judge by, Chicago has an interesting half century coming up.

Chicago property owners pay a solid 33% less tax per market value on like properties compared to my tiny home downstate. Chicagoans have dominated IL politics and reaped the swag.

The underfunding of pensions is a de facto (involuntary) loan from the pension funds to legislators (so said legislators could buy votes for the next election without actually taxing to spend the loot.) IL is awash in "state service providers" that are nothing but a Political Patronage Army.

What are the odds that people promised those pensions (and FTR the vast majority are hardly gold-plated) made the mistake of thinking the State Supreme Court's making them secured creditors of IL means they'll get paid. I don't think it'll happen, though, unless the state starts selling off its parks to cover the shortfall.

Chicago demolished the Taylor Estates and moved the black people to other areas, including the suburbs.

Not the suburbs. ROCKFORD. Which is home to the highest violent crime rate in the state, and is listed as the 5th most dangerous city in the USA. The chaos used to be limited to the SW side of town, but now car-jackings and daytime shootings are spreading outward into overwhelmingly white areas.

Could be that the "white areas" are getting browner (true), or that dysgenic breeding among whites has shifted the mean toward "trailer park."

Hmm Intersting post, What do you think those "Ivory towers" referenced in the article will look like? Seems to me that well defended homesteads and communities in the interior flanked by disfunctional third world cities is not that untenable postion. Mountains in the way on both coasts.

@58 This will be the ugliest and nastiest 4GW campaign in the history of the human race.

Naw. I don't expect to see crucifixions or people impaled on tall stakes...but then I could be wrong. Heads on pikes, oh, that one might come to pass.

BTW, impaling people on stakes (up through their alimentary canal) is still reportedly a trend in sub-Saharan Africa. Maybe "Kevin Green" can pull a David Ruenzel or an Amy Biehl combined with this African practice. Even the Russian judge might begrudge him a 9.9 on that...

It's not going to be resolved peacefully. Honestly, though, that beats the alternative because the alternative is just.that.bad.

When I think about it in these terms, I like to listen to Weev ("future of battles is with autonomous machines,image processing algorithims" "benfits small isolated, fortified populations", yada) for a little optimism. I am thankfully so many big, brained tech guys are red-pilled.

VD:And the United States of America has been losing that war since 1965.

Exactly the same time the (((ruling elites))) got an earlier imperial distraction under way in SE Asia. Same folks who made Hart-Celler possible.

Lawrence Murray:The idea that we can abandon our own cities for farther and farther away suburbs, a phenomenon which has been going on for decades, is one whose time is going to be cut short sooner or later by the simple reality that ordinary people cannot afford to move away from jobs. Not to mention that we will run out of land eventually. At this point it is a game of chicken with (((international financial capitalism))) to see whose rotten undergirding falls out first—do the cities collapse under their own dead weight as a result of our flight and replacement with net tax-consuming vibrants, or do we become impoverished in the long-run as a result of unplugging ourselves from “where the money is”?

Except the "money" is not really there. (((International financial capitalism))) is a closed, rigged casino where the cuck-players always lose and the (((house))) always wins. Hence the long, Gramscian campaign to establish central banking cartels in every country for the past 300 years. (((They))) love to boast endlessly about how their superior IQ enabled them to win - as if the rigged casino table (((they))) own is actually a fair contest of abilities. It's much more about (((tribal nepotism))) than about native intelligence. The financial game has been legally rigged since (((their))) Shabbas-Goy Woodrow Wilson signed the law December 1913. By 1963 it was completely rigged - just in time for the opening of the borders, the "Great Society" and the imperial misadventure/distraction in Vietnam.

Murray's article is a good one which raises many good points. Surprised and pleased to see he's read Stoddard, who saw it coming back in the 1920s. The problem of course is that most of the intended victims of this genocidal program refuse to believe their lying eyes and instead listen to the falsehoods of the (((Lügenpresse))), the Churchians, Cuckservatives and various ghost-dancers, all of whom refuse to admit the fundamental nature of what has been going on for the last century in the place once known as the United States. (((Lügenpresse))) and the others on the list are only now starting to lose some credibility, but far too many whites still fail to see that a war is under way. Obviously we have a lot of work to do yet.

What happens in 4GW when one side simply starts indiscriminately eliminating every single person who even may be an enemy? All day, every day?

Depends on how wide-spread it is. If it's one town, there will be a whole ton of State agents descend and put a stop to it. If it's many towns, the State will be paralyzed. In a small country like Bosnia, the "International Community" will leap in, though these days the "International Community" is stretched a little thin.

I believe, though I hope I am wrong, that in the next four years the United States will collapse. I believe this will occur regardless of the election's outcome, though that will effect the nature of the events.

I believe there will be a period of Anarchy during which starvation for millions will be a real possibility. There will be ethnic slaughter the like of which has never been seen in human history and Whites will not win in all areas.

Ultimately the former United States will be divided into a number of Ethno-Cultural States that may or may not be hostile to one another. Whites of various types will control most of these.

It can get nasty. Was reading on the Taiping Civil War today. As the rebellion was generally by a minority Han population,, Hakka, during and after the war the Qing dynasty was massacring up to 30k Hakka a day during some periods. During the war both sides were endlessly massacring civilian populations.

Even though the war was localised to a smallish area of China the death toll has been estimated at 30m and up to 70m dead. Population of China before the war was 450m estimated.

The Reconquista was a gradual transition of demographics despite the conception of it being a militant civilizational venture.

When it first began it dawned on the political leadership that hastily issuing marching orders to Muslims and Jews to empty reconquered territories was highly erroneous. It dried up the tax base. Towns and cities could not be repopulated quickly enough with Christian settlers to reconstitute revenues - it turned out you can't feed your war machine if you shoot yourself in the foot by economically devastating a region you just invested so much into conquering. So the political leadership adapted and implemented more practical and clement policies to retain the Muslim and Jewish workforce.

It took a few centuries to reclaim Spain under Christian rule and not so much because of fierce resistance by the Muslims and Jews but a moderated or adapted policy of reconquest.

They're not just importing millions of these people, they're importing them and actively teaching them to hate and fear the people living here. The strategy of the Democratic Party depends on keeping its voters terrified of the evil white racists: "Racists are everywhere. Everyone is racist - they all hate you. Only the Party can save you." Not to mention the whole Cultural Marxist grievance industry at American universities constantly churning out new reasons to hate.

You have to point this out to the virtue-signalers constantly. Really rub their faces in it. Keep pointing out how evil they are. Keep pointing out what's coming and how it's all their fault. It's the only way to break through the bubble of self delusion. Don't ever let them walk away thinking they're good people because they're not.

Same thing happened during the end of the Roman Empire, don't get your panties in a bunch over it. We'll rise again, there's really nothing left to save anyways. Let the savages & liberals destory the system which feeds their pathetic exsistence.

do the cities collapse under their own dead weight as a result of our flight and replacement with net tax-consuming vibrants, or do we become impoverished in the long-run as a result of unplugging ourselves from “where the money is”?

Vox - i'm curious, what is the Econ definition of "Wealth"? is it wholly mutable with 'money' and/or 'capital'?

is there any definition of Wealth which excludes 'money' as a portion of the definition?

because, as we all know, modern fiat money is actually a proxy for Debt ...

One odd thing about Washington, DC is the gentrification issue. Whites have actually been moving back into the urban core and reclaiming it. The results are amazing for anyone who knew DC thirty years ago.

I go by many places today that twenty or thirty years were wallowing in abandonment, blight, crack houses, street walkers & pimps in zoot suits, etc. Today you'll find it cleaned up, with young hipster chicks out walking their dogs into the late evening. It's just incredible, the change.

Whites used to be confined pretty much to Capitol Hill and then from Kalorama/Georgetown up a thin corridor into Maryland. Now all the hipsters who grew up in the 'burbs think it's cool to be urban hipsters and they have invaded the place. Big swaths of the city have transformed from warzones into quite nice places.

To the horror of the blacks and most of the city council. What happened to our Chocolate City thing? The new crisis, everybody insanely agrees, is that the city is becoming too white.

It's the best thing that ever happened to DC proper since the MLK riots of 1968 burned so much of it down, where it festered in dysfunction up until now. And that drives them nuts.

It is illogical that the white liberals insist that only a narrow nomenklatura run everything but somehow reject that it was better when it was the white Christian patriarchy doing it.

Detroit: Nuffinville.Chicago: Less than Nuffin.Run by the Nuffin man.But they are the Nuffits and whose hand is up the * controlling them?

@39 How does it feel? Knowing most people disagree with you?It isn't me, it is reality they disagree with. Reality has to go.

@45 - True. Cut the power to most rural places out west and 5, 4, 3, ah the generator has kicked in.

As to Dindus not doing nothing, I've seen many who reject that and act white, aka in accords with the norms of western civilization and Christendom. Think Ben Carson. They are the exception. They were the norm in 1960.

@61 The side that does so, if not opposed because of remoteness (not necessarily geographical) wins. The gang bangers know to avoid the police for now and let the cops hassle those who try to stay out of it.

@63 Naw. I don't expect to see crucifixions or people impaled on tall stakes...but then I could be wrong. Heads on pikes, oh, that one might come to pass.

Being dismembered or rendered quadriplegic as well as blind and deaf and having one's tongue as well as kidneys (dialysis) cut out is now possible due to the advance of modern medicine. Hello Clarise. They will also be a drain on Obamacare finances.

Modern arms aren't designed to kill for that reason. Someone wounded requires someone able to drag them back.

Also see the most frightening horror movie of the 20th century, "Johnny got his gun".

@65 I am thankfully so many big, brained tech guys are red-pilled.We are going to need them.

Also that the existing tech infrastructure is so wonderfully brittle. When the grid goes down, where will they recharge their batteries (Teslas, computers) or communicate (phones). Don't put all your eggs in one deplorable basket, get your Ham license (at least General).

@66, is the little Goy's room a designation for transgender?

@70 untrue. Asians are so conformist that they are both clean to the point of OCD (see Japan) and obedient. But they don't do anything. Asians discover gun powder and invent fireworks. Whites find out and use it for demolition and projectiles.

@76 That is because it is so un-pc to raise a regret rape accusation against someone who is higher on the victimhood category.

@75: Austrians would probably say wealth is the ability to satisfy wants (see Marginal Utility). The wealthier you are the more wants you can satisfy at the moment. The wants can be altruistic or sadistic.

When speaking of gentrification, it is happening in Los Angeles. White, young people (normal couples, gay couples and singles) are moving back into areas that were ugly for the last 30-40 years. One thing that I have noticed though, it is not sustainable because of birth rates. Very few of these people are having kids and the gays for obvious reasons can only recruit. I could be wrong, these are the things that I observe as I travel through the city on a regular basis. Even the areas that are being reclaimed are not being constructed in a family friendly manner. It is a lot of High-rise mixed-use condos that don't attract a lot of families.Speaking of condos. Why is it that high-rise condos remind me of a hive? Is it the hive mentality that is attracted to this type of living? I hate it and always have.

The problem with 4GW is 99.9% of the people can't see what the real problem is. The immigration thing is a symptom. What happens if the real problem is addressed?

Consider the US: Population, about 300 million. About 100 million are between the ages of 25 and 50. Half of them are men, so 50 million. Half of them (25 million) have been married and 50% have been divorced. That's 12.5 million. Let's guestimate that 10% of them really got shafted. That's 1.25 million. Those are just assumptive numbers not meant to be precise because precision doesn't matter here.

Grossman's book "On Killing" makes the point that about 3% of the male population are "killers" who have no emotional problems with killing. It simply doesn't bother them. So, 3% of that 1.25 million is 37,500 and it would only take about 5% of them (1,875) to completely change the US because they wouldn't have a problem with killing random women. If only 5% of the killers who have been run through the meat-grinder of family court and got really shafted came out to play, it's game over.

The goal would be to remove women from the polity. Men have the right to vote as sovereigns but women were given the privilege of voting by men with the 19th Amendment. This is a situation in which the Constitution doesn't secure a right, it grants one. The only way the US can realistically turn things around is to remove women from the polity, but that is politically impossible at this point.

But, what if women voluntarily removed themselves from the polity and stop voting? That works, but how?

Enter 4GW. The message is simple: voting-age women can remove themselves from the rolls of registered voters or be targeted for killing. As a sign to demonstrate they are in compliance they must wear a "uniform" of a head covering and either a dress or skirt in public. Think about what that would do to feminism.

If one considers the impact of the Beltway Snipers, consider what over 900 such teams scattered all across the US could do. They cannot be stopped and women would remove themselves from the rolls of registered voters in droves. The women who screamed and refused to wear the uniform would helpfully allow themselves to be specifically targeted.

Had such a thing started after the Democratic convention this year, it would be amazing to find any women still on the voter rolls by November. Anyone who thinks about it should realize that in the face of such a threat there is no way to keep women on the rolls as voters. If they aren't registered, they can't vote and so they don't vote.

The threat cannot be eliminated and the symbolism of the women in public with head-coverings wearing dresses or skirts would be devastating to the opposition. Any attempt to remove the voter rolls from public view would be an attempt to hold the women hostage and would not be allowed. The registration lists would be online and updated daily because men and women would demand it.

Even more disturbing than the fact it would work is there exists a very good moral argument in favor of the need for such an action. That argument boils down to the point that in the absence of Law, the only recourse for sovereigns to redress an injury is war. The idea of the "rule of Law" is that no-one is above the law. Yet, women were allowed into the polity and after exercising political power, men are systematically having their rights violated in order to benefit women. In violation of the Law.

Aberrations will always occur and eventually be corrected at one level or another, but when the Constitution is systematically ignored in order to violate the rights of one group in favor of another, there is no longer any rule of law. The only way to redress that situation is by war.

This isn't overthrowing the government or the Constitution, it's restoring the Constitution as the rule of law.

Interesting that Murray considers native English speaking skills as the criterium (fourth paragraph). Is that really all?

It takes one, maximum two, generations to acquire language skills on par with the host population. If nothing else matters, then the immigration problem would be only a temporary inconvenience that, some may argue, could be indeed worth the trouble.

But of course a lot more matters, and the skin colour alone is not a small issue. Even other Europeans who, say, migrate to the UK will remain outsiders for a number of generations as they lack the deep ties to the land and local culture and population, even though they speak and look like any other native and can relate to the local culture fairly well through the shared European roots.

When the race is drastically different, such as in the case of Africans, Arabs, or South Asians, the problems are multiplied many times over and what's worse, they don't go away with subsequent generations as the skin colour itself will always keep them apart and create tensions. They themselves will likely perceive any slight, failure, or disappointment as being the result of 'racism' and continue to harbour resentment for the locals both individually as well as collectively. This process will continue regardless of how many generations they've already lived there and how well their native tongue sounds as the visible biological differences will follow them ad infinitum.

The race matters. These three simple words must be entered into the public discourse in a clear, although preferably not too offensive way, or we ourselves will become lost and entangled in out own attempts to avoid the linguistic traps set up for us by the Marxist left. We must throw away the self-imposed 'progressive' filters and free the language to again allow us to state the truth.

The obvious difference between modern American Whites and the "Native Americans" is that the Indians fought back and were overwhelmed. By contrast the Whites have been HELPING the invaders to invade and providing them with all kinds of sustenance when they get here. STOP providing that sustenance and they will probably go home..If it is true that US cities are becoming "majority minority" then judging by the state of cities in south america and africa, it should only be a few years before all the big american cities will look like detroit..But that doesn't mean all the White people will be living on potato farms. Numerous areas that were considered "suburbs" just a few years ago are now fitting the technical definition of cities (more than 50,000 people). They have ALL the attributes of the big cities WITHOUT the dirt and the crime..And contrary to the author's opinion, there is NO shortage of land in the US - anybody who has flown or driven accross the US knows this.

Killing women doesn't stop blacks or moslems from having sex with them.

OT: We need to stop 3rd world aid before something like this takes the brakes off of African population growth.http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/09/new-drug-clears-malaria-from-mice-in-a-single-dose/

lol Really? Well perhaps so, but more than anything it's being "self-inflicted".

Black folks aren't conspiring to topple the white race and besides the Hispanics trying to "take over" America culturally and economically; nobody's out trying to destroy the white man; at least to my knowledge.

If anything the trouble with the white man is going on WITHIN.

The white man is in power of "Western society and Western civilization" on whole.

If things are "toppling" it's the white elite on top who's causing the ruckus which I'm sure y'all already know.

Okay then, lest as some have already said white people and all peoples REPENT all these evils shall come upon us.

@Robert What? This might be hard to believe but Teddy Kennedy had actually carved out a piece of immigration law that specifically allowed HIM (by name) to allocate visas for 50,000 immigrants per year..Relatives of Irish people would visit his office in Boston, donate $5,000, and a visa for their relatives in Ireland would be delivered....And the Republicans and the main stream media went along with this..Kennedy wasn't a deep thinker. He probably thought that the US would be 90% ethnic Irish by now, and at least he was raking in piles of cash for the democrats.

Modern urban centres are so easy to kill. As the old saying goes, a city is only three days away from food riots. Disruptions in transportation infrastructure, water or sewage or energy will trap a huge number of people in urban centres, many of whom will die.

And we don't even have to be proactive for this to happen. The ossified bureaucracy and slovenly civil servants are allowing critical infrastructure to crumble, and "Blue" tax and spending policies ensure monies are not going to infrastructure repair or upkeep. I have friends who tell me that there is still unrepaired damage from Hurricane Sandy, and that happened in 2012 in one of the biggest Democrat stronghold cities.

Urban centres are important, but we always have the option of sending our business and other support to mid sized midwestern cities in the US, and simply turning our backs on and boycotting companies and institutions based in converged "Blue" cities.

This will almost be like the end of "Atlas Shrugged"; the strikers knew the end had come when the lights went out in New York City.

95. GFR September 13, 2016 3:23 PM@Artisanal Toad. Dude, if you shoot all the women you will NEVER get laid..

Think about it. Going from 100 women that only say "NO" (except to thugs or briefly starfishing in Epiphany Phase to reel in and impoverish provider betas via subsequent divorce rape) to 40 women that only say "YES, MASTER" is a distinctive improvement in sexual access for nonalpha white men, I would say.

When speaking of gentrification, it is happening in Los Angeles. White, young people (normal couples, gay couples and singles) are moving back into areas that were ugly for the last 30-40 years. One thing that I have noticed though, it is not sustainable because of birth rates. Very few of these people are having kids

For the most part, the urban gentrifiers are looking for fun in the big city - theaters, clubs, restaurants, boutique stores... all the stuff you don't have time for and can't afford after you have kids. When it comes to raising kids, most White people (hell, everybody really, though some are less energetic in pursuing it) want to raise kids in a small town. Suburbs are fake small towns that let dad commute to his job.

San Francisco is getting whiter, and is projected to get whiter still over time. This caused much hand-wringing, even though it's also projected to become more Asian and no one thought that was bad.

Our local economy has priced out almost all our black folks. The white folks mostly use private/parochial schools. The result is that the battle in our public schools increasingly is between folks trying to lift up the Hispanic (and few remaining black) students, and the Chinese families who are livid that their hardworking children aren't being prioritized. It's interesting to watch, because it's "people of color" vs. "people of color" duking it out - the majority of the white people have left the building, so to speak.

Artisanal Toad wrote:Grossman's book "On Killing" makes the point that about 3% of the male population are "killers" who have no emotional problems with killing. It simply doesn't bother them. So, 3% of that 1.25 million is 37,500 and it would only take about 5% of them (1,875) to completely change the US because they wouldn't have a problem with killing random women.

So now let's take those numbers and re-purpose them. The way to control a population is via its breeding pairs, so we can see how by comparison with the way that Jacob cheated his FIL, open borders suppressing K-selected birthrates are -- in fact -- actually white genocide (of a sort). It's horrible rhetoric, but factually true.

But the best way to prevent breeding pairs is to prevent girls from growing up to breed, since they're the limiting factor. So it wouldn't take many sociopaths to have an effect, and if you look at things like White Girls Bleed Alot and the way that ISIS keeps slaves as much for torture as for sex, that kind of war is already on.

(If you assumed that the purpose of sex slaves was for breeding, take another look at the facts on the ground. They're treated as worthless disposables, even when gravid.)

The entire point was that women, as a group, are very fear-prone and in the grand scheme of things very few women would actually have to be killed in order to affect a serious change. The threat of being killed combined with the constant visual reminder of other women wearing the uniform would cause a rapid and overwhelming withdrawal of women from politics.

Is this disturbing? Undoubtedly.

I did not make any references to sociopaths and in fact, Grossman's book makes the point that the lack of emotional trauma in response to killing is not in and of itself sociopathic. Undoubtedly some of those individuals would be sociopaths, but it is possible to have an intact moral compass and not be affected by killing someone.

War is the continuation of politics by other means and if one is going to wage war it is best to do so in the most effective manner consistent with the goals. In this case it just so happens that the group most vulnerable to 4GW is also the group responsible for the current mess we have.

However, nothing happens in a vacuum and the response by government leaders would be interesting because there really is only one solution. You can't leave them alone and you can't drain the swamp, so the only thing left is to move quickly to put a chip in everyone with chip readers everywhere to track people.

It could go the other way as well and be viewed as such a threat to the world's existing order that the decision was made to pull the plug on the entire country. It would be child's play to take down the financial system and when little plastic cards don't work for anyone, the chaos starts. There are less than 50 critical spots in the nation's power grid and if they go the nation no longer has a power grid. Do it at the beginning of winter and by spring there will be 200 million fewer people.

If and 3rdwhen other races are able to feed off me like some kind of big turkey I am able find a way to derive benefits from them and become an even bigger Turkey to nourish even more... kind of ..at least thats what i try to do...sometimes they pass me by anyway.the meat i have to offer is mediocre anyway..sometimes I graze on them too

Artisanal Toad wrote:I did not make any references to sociopaths and in fact, Grossman's book makes the point that the lack of emotional trauma in response to killing is not in and of itself sociopathic. Undoubtedly some of those individuals would be sociopaths, but it is possible to have an intact moral compass and not be affected by killing someone.

I have not read the book, but I will grant the point on the condition: for non-sociopaths to be fine with killing, they must consider it moral.