Got held up, busy on it now. But it's not even worth translating. This is the worst interview I've ever seen. Just asking and answering stuff we already knew and a guy who says Common Dreads kinda sucks because it's too ambitious and therefore not a real Enter Shikari-album.

The Jester wrote: and a guy who says Common Dreads kinda sucks because it's too ambitious and therefore not a real Enter Shikari-album.

No, the critic meant something else. He did said that the album is to ambitious, that's why it's according to him all a bit 'too much'.

But he didn't said it was not a real Shikari album. He said: 'This album wil not be the defenite Shikari album.' He's possitive about the album, so I think he more ments something like: This will not be THE Shikari classic, (but there will be one later).

The critic is quit possitive about Enter Shikari. He calls a festival gig (August 2007) Legendary and is really looking forward to their upcoming perfmances at festivals. And he called their songs 'fantastic'.

So I think he ments with his quote ' not the defenite Shikari album'. That there will come a Legendary Enter Shikari album. He is really positive about ES. I think you can't possitive about a band, which will only record feeble albums. So with other words: I think you can read between the line, that he thinks that ES has much potential.

And the interview, I totally agree that it's like everything we already know. But it's a magazine for all kinds of music, so I personly think it's handsome for all the people who don't know them yet or don't know them well. It's more an interview for publicity than for real fans I think.