PNG-Australia Relationship will Flourish under Julie Bishop

I have always thought that former Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs Kevin Rudd was overly condemned by observers and media for supposedly not making the Pacific Islands a priority.

And even though I agree that Kevin Rudd was indeed concentrating on marketing Australia to the world as a possible global leader, particularly in terms of Australia’s candidacy for a temporary seat at the UN Security Council and Australia’s leadership regarding Libya, I don’t think the Pacific Islands were ever not a priority for Kevin Rudd as many people who jumped on the bandwagon calling for his head claim.

I believe one of the key reasons for this perception, and one which was often presented to qualify it, was that it had been a while since Kevin Rudd had actually physically visited a Pacific Island State (his last visit to the Pacific was a special meeting on Fiji in PNG during January 2009).

There seems to be a perception present within Australian international relations circles that visiting a foreign state is a clear signal that positive measures have taken place in terms of developing meaningful bilateral ties.

A good example of this is Australian Governor-General Quentin Bryce’s recent 10-day tour of the Pacific, which included visits to Tonga, Samoa, New Caledonia, Solomon Islands, Kiribati and Micronesia; and in which she was accompanied by Australia’s parliamentary secretary for Pacific Affairs, Richard Marles.

Apart from travelling to just about every single atoll in the Pacific, does anybody know what @RichardMarlesMP is actually doing? #PNG

In terms of PNG, the fact of the matter is that despite the individual occupying the foreign affairs ministerial position, he or she will be served by one of Australia’s most effective diplomats – the Australian High Commisioner to PNG Ian Kemish.

Ironically, I suggest it would have only taken an annual weekend visit to PNG by Kevin Rudd to probably shut up most of his critics who have accused him of neglecting the Pacific.

In that sense, and even though most likely not a complete reflection of his work in attending to the Pacific, his lack of action in physically visiting the Pacific in what is realistically not at all a difficult task, did undermine his credibility.

But it is even more difficult for me now to accept the view, and particularly the rhetoric, about how Kevin Rudd took his eyes off the Pacific when comparing his choice of strategy with that of his successor, Bob Carr.

Bob Carr was seen by many to be the person to fill the void created by Kevin Rudd in the Pacific by spending more time and effort on the region, particularly PNG.

Since then, Carr has made a sole visit to New Zealand to “pay them the courtesy of some consultation, given their expert feel for the politics of the South Pacific” after four days of being in office, and has also ventured on a fact-finding mission to Fiji as part of a greater Pacific Islands’ Ministerial Contact Group.

Since taking office, Bob Carr has yet to visit a Pacific State on his own merit in true bi-lateral fashion.

It is difficult for me to imagine a Bob Carr Junior, or even Bob Carr visiting Goroka as Rudd did, or for that matter – any other town outside the comfort zone of Port Moresby’s segregated bureaucratic nature.

But there is some real hope for the Australia-PNG relationship and for the first time, what appears to be an authentic and genuine interest in the affairs of PNG, not in the dominant donor-recipient paradigm which has jarred consecutive Australian foreign affairs ministerial thinking since independence, but in the more mature and progressive vision of Australia and PNG being coadjuvant development-partners.

That vision is one that Julie Bishop believes in. And it’s powerful.

Nothing better reflects this vision more so than Bishop’s recently delivered address to the 28th Australia Papua New Guinea Business Forum and Trade Expo in Brisbane.

In that speech Bishop blows to pieces Kevin Rudd, Bob Carr, and even Richard Marle’s attempts to define how exactly the Australia-PNG relationship can be improved by painting a clear vision of what will happen under her direction.

“Few countries are more important to Australia than Papua New Guinea and I believe that our relationship with Papua New Guinea must be one of Australia’s highest foreign policy priorities.

It is a fact that much has been said over many years about the relationship and I think it is fair for us to be judged not on what we say but on what we do, not on just our words but on our actions”.

Bishop goes on to add:

“It is simply unacceptable for there to be so many bureaucratic hurdles in the way of trade and investment and doing business across the Coral Sea, and I most certainly commit to working with the PNG government to ensure that it can be the most cooperative economic relationship that we are able to achieve”.

And:

“We need to see greater mobility in the labour force between PNG and Australia. I envisage some form of mobile workforce that could be supporting projects in Queensland, in Western Australia, and in PNG, and it will take some considerable will on the part of governments in both countries to achieve it but I am sure we can do it, for our mutual benefit”.

This is a refreshing Australian perspective.

Finally, there is one other aspect of Julie Bishop’s commitment to PNG which has impressed me – and that is her drive to engage with everyday Australians and Papua New Guineans who care about the Australia-PNG relationship.

Great to see the importance of PNG – Aust relationship recoginized.
As an Aussie I was – disgusted , embarrassed and humiliated by Bob Carrs
comments when he became Minister for Foreign Affairs. This was most
un-productive. Julie Bishop is experienced . Pre Politics she was the Senior
Partner at Blake Dawson Lawyers in Perth WA. She will do a good job.
Julia Gillard is a loser and hated across Aust , all polls show her on less than
30% of the primary vote. That means she would have Zero seats in Qld
out of 30. She has lost Government in Qld . It will not get better for her,
she is recognized as a Liar and a Cheat!

Julie Bishop attitude towards Australia_PNG bilateral relationship is promising to quote ” It is a fact that much has been said over many years about the relationship and I think it is fair for us to be judged not on what we say but on what we do, not on just our words but on our actions”. This sentiment is true in itself it must not be mere rhetoric and cheap lip service but quantified through actions because actions speaks louder than mere words. My view is always this PNG development progress as a nation must be guided by Australia’s support until we such time we can fully look after ourselves. By that I mean our socio_economic indicators are low etc. PNG can say we are political independent (I argued independence was too early for me) but economically + socially we need further support. This is reality! On that note_PNGns need more exposure in countries like Australia and New Zealand. The authoritarian visa processing for PNGns is another matter of concern plus other concerns too. Therefore given our closeness and a former colony stronger bi-lateral relationship must be encouraged not only by word but by actions.

Bishop has continuously said that PNG should be Australia’s highest international priority – there is no doubt that PNG and Australia are friends. But the time for words is over. Let’s see some real tangible results that reflect this goodwill.

I think Australia is swinging towards political change. Our foreign policies and strategies will also subtly change. What is interesting here is, as you rightly point out, Australia’s attitude to PNG looks to be changing slowly due the growing importance of PNG to Australia – in every sense of that meaning. I think Bishop has realised that the “PNG Juggernaut” (that’s what is has the potential to be) is only beginning to grow. Gone are the days of outdated paternalistic attitudes to countries like, and particularly to PNG. Australia needs to change or PNG will find happy pastures somewhere else.