If you are one of the millions of conservatives
who would like to see ultra-liberal Barney Frank out of Congress, you
now have a good chance of achieving that-by supporting Chuck Morse who
has obtained official ballot status in his campaign against Barney Frank.

While Morse calls himself a "Romney-Bush Republican,"
he registered too late to formally become the Republican candidate and
thus is running as an Independent. The Massachusetts Republican Party
has given no indication that it intends to put up its own candidate to
oppose Frank this year, which means that Morse is essentially the de-facto
Republican nominee. Republicans seem satisfied with Morse's candidacy
and most will no doubt vote for and financially support him

Morse believes that he has earned the support of
the Republicans in his district. "I've been meeting with Republican groups
during the past few months and will continue to do so as I organize for
the election," he said. Morse also expects to broaden his base by appealing
to Independents and fed-up Democrats. The number of unenrolled voters
in Massachusetts has been increasing with each election and now stands
at over 50 percent of the electorate. "If elected," Morse says, "I will
caucus with the Republicans."

Although this fight is over the seat in the House
of Representatives for the Fourth Congressional District in Massachusetts,
the campaign has national repercussions. Barney Frank is the darling of
the far left, a supporter of abortion on demand, and an important spokesperson
for Gay Marriage. Therefore, he will receive substantial financial support
from these powerful national constituencies of the left.

Morse, who hosted a conservative radio talk show
on Boston's Salem Radio affiliate WROL, is raising funds both in the State
and nationally. He hopes to raise enough money to launch a TV campaign
in the final weeks of the campaign. He intends to use that campaign to
illustrate in graphic detail the effects of the "Frank Amendment" which
made it easier for terrorists to enter the U.S. legally.

In a press release on the subject, Morse called
on Frank to resign from the Congressional Committee on Homeland Security.
"Barney Frank unwittingly served as an enabler of the 9/11 terrorists
by his meddling in immigration policy in the 1980s," stated Morse. The
Frank Amendment opened the "Turnstiles of Terrorism in America," Morse
charged.

Morse also quoted Gerald Posner's New York Times
bestseller, "Why America Slept: The Failure to Prevent 9/11." Posner wrote:

Senior CIA officers complained to the president's
national security team about their frustration with the FBI and warned
that America was vulnerable to Islamic terrorists entering on legal visas
and setting up sleeper cells.

Reagan responded in September 1986 by forming an
interagency task force, the Alien Border Control Committee (ABCC), whose
purpose was to block entry of suspected terrorists and to deport militants
who either had come into the country illegally or had overstayed their
visas. The CIA and the FBI joined the ABCC effort.

Six months after its formation, the ABCC had its
first notable success. The CIA tipped off the FBI to a group of suspected
Palestinian terrorists in Los Angeles. The Bureau arrested eight men.
But instead of being lauded, the Bureau and the Agency came under harsh
attack from civil liberties groups who argued that ABCC should be banned
from using any information the CIA had gained from the government's routine
processing of visa requests.

Congressman Barney Frank, the Massachusetts Democrat
who was a strong advocate of protecting civil liberties, led a successful
effort to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act so that membership
in a terrorist group was no longer sufficient to deny a visa.

Under Frank's amendment, which seems unthinkable
post-9/11, a visa could only be denied if the government could prove that
the applicant had committed an act of terrorism.

Rendered toothless by the Frank Amendment, the Reagan
administration had virtually no way to block visas even when there was
information linking the individuals to terrorist groups.

Besides challenging Frank on National Security and
important social issues, Morse is also challenging Frank on his economic
policies. Washington Post columnist David Broder, in a piece entitled
"One Bold Thinker Among the Democrats" (3/14/04), wrote that Frank complained
in a speech to an economic group that the government was too small. He
called for tax increases and a re-launching of FDR's New Deal. Morse says
that Frank advocates the "old, discredited and regressive ideas of big
government and high taxes."

This is one of those crucial elections that can
potentially change the political fault lines in the country. A Frank defeat
would be a political and psychological disaster for the left. Either way,
the voters of the Fourth District of Massachusetts will have a real choice
in November. They will have another chance to consider Frank, who has
agreed to a series of debates with Morse, in what promises to be an exciting
political event.

Morse believes that he has earned
the support of the Republicans in his district. "I've been meeting with
Republican groups during the past few months and will continue to do so
as I organize for the election," he said. Morse also expects to broaden
his base by appealing to Independents and fed-up Democrats.