Contents

Re: Userpage

About your idea, you should talk to Dantman. He rules over this wiki, he would be abel to sort it out. About the userpage policy, whenever I delete a userpage: I leave a comment that has a link to the userpage policy. When someone is going to edit a deleted page, it says at the top who deleted it and a comment from the admin about why it was deleted, and the link to the userpage policy comes first, directly after the title. And when you edit a talk page, don't forget to put ~~~~ after your text. That will leave your sign with a link to you and the date and time for the edit. Jacce | Talk 11:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Check out Help:New page for an explanation of how to create new pages on the wiki. The "Create a new wiki" button is a Wikia thing for creating an entirely different wiki. ~NOTASTAFFDaniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire)(talk)Jun 1, 2009 @ 17:17 (UTC)

First...Please sign u'r comments...its not that hard..just type ~~~~...Its the key beloy ESC...Second read the talk page...I suggested it be deleted because a page similar, and with more info allready exists...The deleting was done by a very respected admin in TheUltimate3....He always has a gud reason for watevr he does and was one of the admins who helped Found this site....My reason i've given u...a page allready exists for wat u created, and was thus unneccesary...AlienGamer | Talk 20:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

First off, wat do u mean code???As much as we appreciate u'r efforts, in my opinion a better option was avaliabe to users intrested in reading about the hosts and the tailed beasts in the Jinchūriki article, and no...The Jinchūriki page is far better than the one u created...yes, it was only created today, but y start a new article, when u can help improve the previous one??....And as much as u might want to think about conspiracy theories, and how TheUltimate3 and I planned this, u'r wrong...Yes I highly respect him, but all i did was make a suggestion...then not 1 but 2 admins agreed with me (snapper2 also being an admin)...Thank u for trying to make this wiki better..but if i may make a suggestion, wen making a major change, or u want to replace a previous article..its better to discuss it In a talkpage than it is to make a decision all by yourself, as more often than not, this will be the result..AlienGamer | Talk 21:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The "code", or in other words source of the page still remains in the page history. Now as for your comments, Newton and Keplar have nothing to do with this. This is a wiki, a wiki survives on collaboration. Working on two different projects doing the same thing isn't collaboration. You created a page with duplicate content so it was redirected to the already existing content, the help page I pointed you to explicitly points out you should take the time to check if the information you are trying to add already exists on the wiki, and it was. ~NOTASTAFFDaniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire)(talk)Jun 1, 2009 @ 21:52 (UTC)

You wanted me to do something on a Naruto Wiki

Ok, what do you want me to do..I'll do it Annaatar (talk) 11:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Naruto Wiki

I'm to pretend to know this Wikia's policy on this subject, but I think it wise to hold off this promotion of your own wikia until you've spoken to Dantman.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Oi. Did you hear me? At least hold off until you've spoken to Dantman.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 12:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Basically, he's tryin to recruit any user who's been in anyway warned by The Wiki...AlienGamer | Talk 12:13, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

If u want help this badly, go to the main wiki site, and ask for help in one of the Help forums..AlienGamer | Talk 12:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

I've been blocked

GangesShark, you were merely blocked because you were going around linkspaming your wiki to other users. There is no wiki or even forum site in their right mind that would permit that.

The article you created wasn't deleted. As you can see right here the page still exists in the history and it's possible to get the source out from it. The problem is the page is counterproductive. You created a completely new article when we already had an article on the topic, as you can see on the talk page multiple users and even a random reader commented on this fact. You're free to improve the existing articles, that's what the edit button is for, but creating a different page about the same thing detracts from improvement of the wiki. Discussion on how to improve things is also open, you just never started one with the community. ~NOTASTAFFDaniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire)(talk)Jun 2, 2009 @ 16:53 (UTC)