<quoted text>No, dude, you said "LOL can you name any of those books?", in reference to the indoc books that I said existed, but that you said did not. Stay focused upon the truth, and you will be free. Lie, and be known as a liar. It's all there, in the post. Go look. Nowhere in that post did you make any specifications, at all. You subsequently posted that you "meant" to post something about GLSEN, which clearly shows that you had omitted to include this in your post. Now shut up, or admit defeat like a man.

What would you know about being a man, bigfoot?Anybody can look, and see I am telling the truth:

R Hudson wrote:

The same indoc that Chongo disputes is cited here, however..."Assistant Deputy Secretary, Department of Education  Kevin JenningsJennings is the founder of the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a group dedicated to promoting the homosexual agenda to school children as young as five. Theyre sick people and even promote books that feature adult-child sex in a favorable way...

And you said that we could go round and round, but that you were not going to argue the point any more. You dropped the issue, and now claim that you didn't. Liar. No one can trust a liar, and you are plainly that.

<quoted text>I find it interesting that so many sinners focus on what they think they understand and ignore what they can't explain in the Bible.It's even more interesting to watch the passionate persistent push against something you say is fiction.Ho, Ho, Ho.

Because jerks like you try to impose that fiction on others. If you would just keep your nonsense to yourselves, I wouldn't care much.

I can explain anything in the Buy-bull...It's a bunch of Bronze Age myth and superstition.Next.

<quoted text>And, nothing COULD show adult/child sex in a favorable light.

Then let the people who said this about GLSEN know that."Theyre sick people and even promote books that feature adult-child sex in a favorable way"

Randy Hudson wrote:

What's wrong with you ? Were you hoping to find some sort of "family friendly" pedophilia, and thought that I'd be able to steer you towards some ? I told you that you'd have to find your own bedtime reading material.

You quoted this in your post:"Theyre sick people and even promote books that feature adult-child sex in a favorable way"I knew it was BS.So, I challenged you to come up with the title of one of those books.You didn't. They don't exist.LOLSER!

<quoted text>What would you know about being a man, bigfoot?Anybody can look, and see I am telling the truth:<quoted text>Then I said: "LOL! Can you name one of those books?"http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...Well, WTF could I have meant by "those books"? Well, ugly, the books described just before I ask the question. Books promoted by GLSEN that feature adult-child sex in a favorable way.LOL! Ever feel like killing yourself because you are so stupid and ugly? Well, don't.

No, dude, you asked me to name the books to which I was referring, and I did. "The same indoc that Chongo disputes is cited here, however..."Assistant Deputy Secretary, Department of Education  Kevin JenningsJennings is the founder of the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a group dedicated to promoting the homosexual agenda to school children as young as five. Theyre sick people and even promote books that feature adult-child sex in a favorable way..." Here is the pertinent part "..a group dedicated to promoting the homosexual agenda to school children as young as five...". Now....If you were mentally sending me a Jedi message that you wished to specify, I am not a Jedi. You admitted that you MEANT to ask about those mentally specified books, but as you omitted to SPECIFY that the books you wished to have me list, the fault is yours. You didn't say to mention the GLSEN books showing adult/child sex in a favorable light. You hoped that I wouldn't be able to list the books to which I was referring, namely , the homosexual agenda books. It's all there, and next time, you must specify what it is that you wish to receive. That "forgot to specify" bit might work at cheating McD out of a free burger, it will not cut the mustard here. But as you said, it's all there for anyone to read, and you f***ed up. End it. As far as knowing about men, you are only 1/2 a man, if you cannot admit making a mistake. Now if you wish to find some kind of "family friendly" pedophilia, you will have to soil your own computer with it, I do not know any such books, nor would I care to research this most disgusting of subjects.

<quoted text>LOL. Silliest argument yet. "Gender integration and segregation"? REALLY? Seriously?PROVE that same sex marriages are harmful to straight folks. Prove that it harms society. Prove that it would not be beneficial to the gay couples that choose it. Prove that marriages does not provide emotional and financial stability to the elderly - gay or not. Prove that having married parents is harmful to children.If this is the best you can do, why bother?

See ? There you go, again, with the twisting. First you drop the subject. Then you say you didn't. NOW, you say that you changed about dropping it, when first you dropped it, then denied doing it, and end up contradicting yourself. Twice. Pal, you're insane, especially if you think that we ain't noticing it. Twisting motherf***er.

<quoted text>Then let the people who said this about GLSEN know that."Theyre sick people and even promote books that feature adult-child sex in a favorable way"<quoted text>You quoted this in your post:"Theyre sick people and even promote books that feature adult-child sex in a favorable way"I knew it was BS.So, I challenged you to come up with the title of one of those books.You didn't. They don't exist.LOLSER!

And, while we're at it, I cut n pasted an entire paragraph, in which that bit about the adult/child sex books were mentioned (I seriously hope that no adult/child sex books are being published), I had disputed your claim that Pro-Gay Indoc books do not exist. What say you, to that ? Do you deny the existence of the 50 or so books that I mentioned ?

So, you admit (through omission of an explanation0 that you had nothing to report ? Just bullshitting again, right ? Blowing smoke...Creating fantasies that you hope will make you seem important ? Attempting to create an aura of power and authority that disapates with the mildest draft ?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.