One of Audi’s most popular models gets upgrades for the 2018 model year.

Share this story

The Q5 has long been one of Audi’s best-selling models in the US. And what’s not to like? It’s a respectable-looking and functional mid-size crossover, slotting in between the bite-size Q3 and the three-row Audi Q7. With a base MSRP of $42,475, the Q5 competes with stalwarts like the BMW X3, Lexus RX450, and Acura RDX, as well as upstarts like the Alfa Romeo Stelvio (look for our review soon). But the Q5 was getting a bit stale, as it hadn’t seen any substantive changes since its introduction in 2008. With the 2018 model, Audi has updated the Q5, making this a good time to check in with its workhorse.

What’s new in 2018

Further Reading

Gone is the old 2.0-liter, turbocharged, four-cylinder engine, replaced by a... 2.0-liter, turbocharged, four-cylinder engine. This year’s model offers 252hp and 273lb-ft of torque, an improvement on 2017’s 220hp and 258lb-ft of torque. That should get you from zero to 60mph in a smooth 5.8 seconds, a touch faster than last year. The all-wheel drive Q5 comes with a seven-speed, dual-clutch transmission. If you want more in the way of raw performance, there’s an SQ5 version with a turbocharged, 354hp V-6 and an eight-speed transmission for about $12,000 more.

On the outside, the 2018 Q5 is an inch longer, two inches wider, and has a slightly longer wheelbase. The tweaks to the hood, grille, and sideview mirrors make for a more aerodynamic design. In terms of exterior design, the 2018 Q5 is evolutionary rather than revolutionary.

The Q5 interior has seen some upgrades as well, most notably the MMI infotainment system and instrument cluster. Both of those have been given the “retina treatment,” with the instrument cluster now consisting of a cleverly laid-out, smaller HD screen that can supplement or mirror the functions of the main 8.3-inch HD screen which protrudes unobtrusively from the middle of the dashboard. The climate control and drive select buttons are now touch-sensitive as well.

Further Reading

The Q5 I tested was tricked out with Audi’s Prestige package. This includes 20-inch wheels instead of the usual 18-inchers, LED headlights, touch-sensitive MMI interface, adaptive cruise control, a top-view camera system, and more. With all of the included options, this one would retail for $56,100. Audi rates the Q5’s mileage at 25mpg (23 city, 27 highway); I saw just over 27 on the highway and in the 22.5-23.5 range for city driving.

An interior Darth Vader would be proud to drive

Further Reading

Let’s start with the interior. Trimmed out with the finishes you’d expect in a $50,000 car, the cockpit is now on par with that of the Q7, and it is a very comfortable place to spend time in. I don’t want to wax too much on Audi’s outstanding MMI system; Jonathan Gitlin covered it in his review of the 2016 Audi TT, and Ron Amadeo went into even more depth in his infotainment feature. You should definitely read those articles if you want a more detailed look at it—the MMI is a truly fantastic piece of technology.

Much of the MMI’s excellence comes from its interface. You interact with the main MMI display via a large knob, four buttons, and what looks like a trackpad. Taken together, they make fiddling with the radio, entering an address, or tweaking other settings very simple. You can even write the first letters of an address or city on the touchpad when using GPS navigation.

The 12.3-inch HD display that takes the place of the usual instrument panel is also a pleasure to use. It has a tabbed interface with steering wheel controls that allows the driver to interact with the GPS, change radio stations, make a phone call, and see the usual mileage and fuel economy statistics. The two screens work together for a tightly integrated infotainment experience.

Some people think this is somber, but it's a temple of calm.

Audi

A bird’s-eye view of the center console with MMI controls.

Eric Bangeman

A close-up of the MMI controls. Top row of numbers is for radio presets, the buttons at left and right function like mouse buttons, the trackpad bit accepts text input, and the knob moves you around the MMI’s options.

Audi

The instrument cluster is actually an HD “retina” style display. Here, the GPS is active.

Top level of the MMI interface. If you have an iPhone or Android phone connected, you’ll see a CarPlay or Android Auto option appear.

Eric Bangeman

The Q5’s interior is well-trimmed. The front seats are comfortable and come with adjustable lumbar support. There’s plenty of headroom, even with the panoramic moonroof, and two adults can sit comfortably in the adjustable backseats, which have their own climate controls. You can fold down the three seats independently, when needed, for 60+ cubic feet of cargo space. With the seats up, you have an adequate 26.8 cubic feet of space, accessible via the standard power liftgate. That middle seat is going to be bad news for any normal-sized adult, however.

Included in the Prestige trim is a heads-up display. It shows your current speed, the local speed limit, and indicates whether lane-assist is active. If you’re using the GPS, you’ll also see navigation prompts. Should you find the heads-up display too distracting, you can turn it off, but it’s useful for keeping your eyes on the road instead of flitting about the cabin.

Hitting the road

I began driving the Q5 the day after wrapping up a week with the new Alfa Romeo Stelvio, and the contrast between the two vehicles couldn’t be more pronounced. You’ll be able to read—and watch—my take on that SUV next week, but briefly, the times when the Stelvio felt like a performance sedan in the body of a crossover—giving me a strong sense of connection with the road—the Q5 felt like it distanced me from what was going on around me. And that’s not entirely a bad thing.

I spent most of my time behind the Q5 with the drive set on comfort or dynamic (you can also select offroad, allroad, efficiency, or auto). My daily driver is a 2008 Audi TT, which I love in part because of the powerful connection I feel with the road when I’m behind the wheel. In contrast, the Q5 made me feel insulated from the road, but in a good way.

The 2018 Q5 is a wee bit longer and wider than the 2017.

Marlowe Bangeman

In addition to the back-up camera, there are cameras on all four corners of the car, as well as the front.

Marlowe Bangeman

The Q5 has LED taillights with dynamic signals. The headlights are LED as well.

Marlowe Bangeman

It’s not an unattractive car.

Marlowe Bangeman

When seated in the comfortable cockpit with all of the driver-assist features enabled, you’ll have the feeling of being squired to your destination.

Marlowe Bangeman

You can fit three people back here, as long as someone doesn't mind being stuck in the middle. When there are only two, the middle bit folds down into an armrest and cupholder.

Marlowe Bangeman

Plenty of storage room when the back seats fold down. Unfortunately, they don’t fold flat.

Marlowe Bangeman

Let’s start with road noise—it’s largely absent when you’re in a Q5, regardless of speed or traffic. The Q5 is so quiet, I suspected Audi of using noise-cancellation to mask driving sounds. Instead, it’s the windows and insulation that make for a quiet ride.

The 2.0-liter turbocharged engine always has enough for whatever is asked of it, although I felt a brief hesitation before the turbo kicked in once or twice. That said, the engine responds when summoned, even if it’s not nearly as quick as that of the Stelvio. On winding country roads, the high driving position was a reminder that I wasn’t in a roadster and that I should lay back a little bit in the curves. But when I did push a little, I felt fairly locked onto the pavement, without any real top-heavy feeling.

Giving the driver a helping hand

Audi has been one of the automakers at the forefront of assisted driving, and the Q5 I tested came loaded with the tech. Adaptive cruise control worked extremely well, keeping pace with the car in front of me even in slow-and-go traffic. You can manually adjust your following distance via the MMI, which is useful.

Lane assist kicks on once you’re in the neighborhood of 35mph. Once the lane indicators in the heads-up display turn green, you’re in business. Like other vehicles, Audi’s system can struggle with faded lane markings, especially on very bright days. But when engaged, it will detect when you’re drifting into another lane and steer back towards the center.

Feeling the steering wheel move under my hand was a little unsettling the first time it happened, and if the Q5 needs to do two or three corrections in a short period of time, it will politely remind you to keep your hands on the wheel. But it works very well, leading to that feeling of disengagement that I occasionally ran into while driving the Audi. Last on the driver-assist list are three yellow lights on the sideview mirrors that flash when a car is in your blind spot.

It’s not just the lack of road or engine noise that makes piloting the Q5 a calming experience. The posh interior, quiet ride, and technological sophistication synchronized to make the days I spent behind the wheel of the Q5 rewarding ones. The Q5 doesn’t offer an exhilarating ride—the Stelvio is as close as I’ve come to that feeling behind the wheel of a crossover—but it’s an immensely satisfying ride.

The crossover market is crowded, and if you’ve got $45,000 to $60,000 to spend, picking which crossover is right for you is going to be tough. Where Audi sets itself apart from the competition is the instrument panel and infotainment system. The only other manufacturer that comes close is Volvo, and both Audi and Volvo stand head and shoulders above the crowd. In some ways, that was the hardest thing about watching the Q5 drive away from my house—knowing that I was returning to a world of fiddly infotainment systems.

Audi’s cockpit ergonomics are also fantastic. Everything is within easy reach, and the learning curve is a shallow one. You’re not going to need to spend hours leafing through the owner’s manual to figure out how everything works. Five to 10 minutes in your garage messing around and you’ll be the master of your crossover domain.

If you value technological sophistication, smart design, and plush ride above all else, then the Q5 is the car for you. While you may not feel as connected to the pavement as you would in something sportier, like a Stelvio, you’re going to feel like the king of the road, moving in a serene and stately fashion from point A to point B. And that’s not a bad way to go.

71 Reader Comments

>The only other manufacturer that comes close is Volvo, and both Audi and Volvo stand head and shoulders above the crowd.

It's funny you say this, I have the exact same 2018 Q5 pictured at the top (down to the wheels and wood trim) but I have a Premium Plus with virtual cockpit (it was the only feature I wanted from the Prestige). And, my better half just picked up a new Volvo XC60. We both came from cars to SUVs (me from a 2014 RS5 and her from a Volvo S60) and have been extremely pleased so far. I can say that I'm truly impressed by the Q5's pick-up around town. It definitely feels like it has more grunt down low than my RS5 did, believe it or not.

I just picked up one of the newly redesigned X3s. I know you guys don’t do shootouts or comparisons really, but I’d be interested to know what you mean about Audi and Volvo blowing away everyone else in instruments and infotainment.

I tested both the SQ5 with digital cockpit and the new X3 with digital dash and they didn’t seem much different. I mean obviously there are differences but as far as features, fit and finish.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen you guys review a BMW though so I’m not holding my breath that we will get a comparison to the Audi or Alfa. Many reviewers are saying the iDrive is now best in its class, I’m not sure I’d go that far but I am surprised about you considering MMI that much better.

I did find it a bit weird ergonomically that the SQ5’s MMI knob and touchpad are above the shifter so you have to reach over it. The touch pad especially felt a bit awkward in this regard, your photos reminded me of it.

I like Audi, I’m not trying to be a BMW shill, I previously had an S4 and several VWs over the years, but in the end I got the X3 because at a half second faster to 60 the X3 is a lot more fun to drive, and the fit and finish are superb, really stepped up from previous gen X3. It will be interesting to see what Audi does with the SQ5 in coming years, I got the feeling they are not making it better because they’re protecting their Macan tier, in order to get to where my X3 is with a VAG car in this segment I had to jump to Macan GTS, which is about $30k more. Of course you also get more track tuning and prestige with that sticker.

Here’s hoping you guys get an X3 M40i to test, look forward to more CarsTechnica regardless.

>The only other manufacturer that comes close is Volvo, and both Audi and Volvo stand head and shoulders above the crowd.

It's funny you say this, I have the exact same 2018 Q5 pictured at the top (down to the wheels and wood trim) but I have a Premium Plus with virtual cockpit (it was the only feature I wanted from the Prestige). And, my better half just picked up a new Volvo XC60. We both came from cars to SUVs (me from a 2014 RS5 and her from a Volvo S60) and have been extremely pleased so far. I can say that I'm truly impressed by the Q5's pick-up around town. It definitely feels like it has more grunt down low than my RS5 did, believe it or not.

I was too looking at Q5 went with Rdx because lease was dirt cheap since they have a higher resale value than Q5. Both are about the same when it comes to 0-60.

>The only other manufacturer that comes close is Volvo, and both Audi and Volvo stand head and shoulders above the crowd.

It's funny you say this, I have the exact same 2018 Q5 pictured at the top (down to the wheels and wood trim) but I have a Premium Plus with virtual cockpit (it was the only feature I wanted from the Prestige). And, my better half just picked up a new Volvo XC60. We both came from cars to SUVs (me from a 2014 RS5 and her from a Volvo S60) and have been extremely pleased so far. I can say that I'm truly impressed by the Q5's pick-up around town. It definitely feels like it has more grunt down low than my RS5 did, believe it or not.

I was too looking at Q5 went with Rdx because lease was dirt cheap since they have a higher resale value than Q5. Both are about the same when it comes to 0-60.

It’s worth pointing out that residual values are often just made up with the purpose of formulating a specific lease deal. You may be right in the end that your Acura will have a higher value as a percent than the Q5 at the end of the lease, but for the purpose of comparing the lease deals it’s all just about where the leasing company wants to make the money and where they are willing to cut to make a deal.

As an example, you may often see older models with higher lease residuals, which makes no sense. Why is their 2017 model with its 2011 design that will look a bit outdated going to be worth 5% more in 3 years than the 2018 incoming model? It’s not, they’re just trying to sell 2017s.

I just picked up one of the newly redesigned X3s. I know you guys don’t do shootouts or comparisons really, but I’d be interested to know what you mean about Audi and Volvo blowing away everyone else in instruments and infotainment.

I tested both the SQ5 with digital cockpit and the new X3 with digital dash and they didn’t seem much different. I mean obviously there are differences but as far as features, fit and finish.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen you guys review a BMW though so I’m not holding my breath that we will get a comparison to the Audi or Alfa. Many reviewers are saying the iDrive is now best in its class, I’m not sure I’d go that far but I am surprised about you considering MMI that much better.

I did find it a bit weird ergonomically that the SQ5’s MMI knob and touchpad are above the shifter so you have to reach over it. The touch pad especially felt a bit awkward in this regard, your photos reminded me of it.

I like Audi, I’m not trying to be a BMW shill, I previously had an S4 and several VWs over the years, but in the end I got the X3 because at a half second faster to 60 the X3 is a lot more fun to drive, and the fit and finish are superb, really stepped up from previous gen X3. It will be interesting to see what Audi does with the SQ5 in coming years, I got the feeling they are not making it better because they’re protecting their Macan tier, in order to get to where my X3 is with a VAG car in this segment I had to jump to Macan GTS, which is about $30k more. Of course you also get more track tuning and prestige with that sticker.

Here’s hoping you guys get an X3 M40i to test, look forward to more CarsTechnica regardless.

X3 is on the list. I’m actually driving an X3 rental right now as we had an out-of-town wedding. I wanted to avoid putting the miles on our old Pacifica and I had a free rental, so I decided to get some miles behind the wheel of one in anticipation of a review.

I always thought the Q5 looked rather ugly. Drove nice when I test drove one but I ultimately went with an XC60, but I also would have taken a Subaru Outback or Forester over the Audi. There's just something off about the Q series vehicles.

The Q5 is so quiet, I suspected Audi of using noise-cancellation to mask driving sounds. Instead, it’s the windows and insulation that make for a quiet ride.

To me, this is particularly impressive and praise-worthy. I don't mind noise-cancelling techniques being used to enhance the silence in the cabin, but I do want manufacturers to get the basics right by physically engineering the car well - good seals, thick glass, good insulation. Props to Audi for doing this.

I just picked up one of the newly redesigned X3s. I know you guys don’t do shootouts or comparisons really, but I’d be interested to know what you mean about Audi and Volvo blowing away everyone else in instruments and infotainment.

I tested both the SQ5 with digital cockpit and the new X3 with digital dash and they didn’t seem much different. I mean obviously there are differences but as far as features, fit and finish.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen you guys review a BMW though so I’m not holding my breath that we will get a comparison to the Audi or Alfa. Many reviewers are saying the iDrive is now best in its class, I’m not sure I’d go that far but I am surprised about you considering MMI that much better.

I did find it a bit weird ergonomically that the SQ5’s MMI knob and touchpad are above the shifter so you have to reach over it. The touch pad especially felt a bit awkward in this regard, your photos reminded me of it.

I like Audi, I’m not trying to be a BMW shill, I previously had an S4 and several VWs over the years, but in the end I got the X3 because at a half second faster to 60 the X3 is a lot more fun to drive, and the fit and finish are superb, really stepped up from previous gen X3. It will be interesting to see what Audi does with the SQ5 in coming years, I got the feeling they are not making it better because they’re protecting their Macan tier, in order to get to where my X3 is with a VAG car in this segment I had to jump to Macan GTS, which is about $30k more. Of course you also get more track tuning and prestige with that sticker.

Here’s hoping you guys get an X3 M40i to test, look forward to more CarsTechnica regardless.

X3 is on the list. I’m actually driving an X3 rental right now as we had an out-of-town wedding. I wanted to avoid putting the miles on our old Pacifica and I had a free rental, so I decided to get some miles behind the wheel of one in anticipation of a review.

That’s great news. Even better if your current rental is the outgoing model for reference.

>The only other manufacturer that comes close is Volvo, and both Audi and Volvo stand head and shoulders above the crowd.

It's funny you say this, I have the exact same 2018 Q5 pictured at the top (down to the wheels and wood trim) but I have a Premium Plus with virtual cockpit (it was the only feature I wanted from the Prestige). And, my better half just picked up a new Volvo XC60. We both came from cars to SUVs (me from a 2014 RS5 and her from a Volvo S60) and have been extremely pleased so far. I can say that I'm truly impressed by the Q5's pick-up around town. It definitely feels like it has more grunt down low than my RS5 did, believe it or not.

I was too looking at Q5 went with Rdx because lease was dirt cheap since they have a higher resale value than Q5. Both are about the same when it comes to 0-60.

It’s worth pointing out that residual values are often just made up with the purpose of formulating a specific lease deal. You may be right in the end that your Acura will have a higher value as a percent than the Q5 at the end of the lease, but for the purpose of comparing the lease deals it’s all just about where the leasing company wants to make the money and where they are willing to cut to make a deal.

As an example, you may often see older models with higher lease residuals, which makes no sense. Why is their 2017 model with its 2011 design that will look a bit outdated going to be worth 5% more in 3 years than the 2018 incoming model? It’s not, they’re just trying to sell 2017s.

Yea that’s what happened when I leased a Jeep their residual values were inflated (Chrysler capital ) but Honda and Toyota financials arms are very conservative with their residual most base Rdx typically sell for more than Q5.

As for 2018 vs 2017 they are just being conservative and also refresh of a model means more issues = less resale value.

I just picked up one of the newly redesigned X3s. I know you guys don’t do shootouts or comparisons really, but I’d be interested to know what you mean about Audi and Volvo blowing away everyone else in instruments and infotainment.

I tested both the SQ5 with digital cockpit and the new X3 with digital dash and they didn’t seem much different. I mean obviously there are differences but as far as features, fit and finish.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen you guys review a BMW though so I’m not holding my breath that we will get a comparison to the Audi or Alfa. Many reviewers are saying the iDrive is now best in its class, I’m not sure I’d go that far but I am surprised about you considering MMI that much better.

I did find it a bit weird ergonomically that the SQ5’s MMI knob and touchpad are above the shifter so you have to reach over it. The touch pad especially felt a bit awkward in this regard, your photos reminded me of it.

I like Audi, I’m not trying to be a BMW shill, I previously had an S4 and several VWs over the years, but in the end I got the X3 because at a half second faster to 60 the X3 is a lot more fun to drive, and the fit and finish are superb, really stepped up from previous gen X3. It will be interesting to see what Audi does with the SQ5 in coming years, I got the feeling they are not making it better because they’re protecting their Macan tier, in order to get to where my X3 is with a VAG car in this segment I had to jump to Macan GTS, which is about $30k more. Of course you also get more track tuning and prestige with that sticker.

Here’s hoping you guys get an X3 M40i to test, look forward to more CarsTechnica regardless.

I don't know where you're getting that $30k more for the same performamce.

You got a x3 m40i (or a x3 35i) and those start at around 53-54k msrp for the base model... about the same as SQ5 and Macan S....

And the Macan S is faster 0-60 with their PDK... (low 4 seconds, vs mid 4 seconds for BMW, and high 4 seconds for SQ5) not to mention that it's better in the corners and the suspension is set up better so that you don't sag into the corners from body roll while being just as comfortable on a normal road...

Also, the main difference between the BMW iDrive and MMI is the virtual cockpit. The fact that you can have maps and other specific info display right in font of you as a driver makes it better than the iDrive. But iDrive is easier to navigate with the knob without relying on the buttons.

I just picked up one of the newly redesigned X3s. I know you guys don’t do shootouts or comparisons really, but I’d be interested to know what you mean about Audi and Volvo blowing away everyone else in instruments and infotainment.

I tested both the SQ5 with digital cockpit and the new X3 with digital dash and they didn’t seem much different. I mean obviously there are differences but as far as features, fit and finish.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen you guys review a BMW though so I’m not holding my breath that we will get a comparison to the Audi or Alfa. Many reviewers are saying the iDrive is now best in its class, I’m not sure I’d go that far but I am surprised about you considering MMI that much better.

I did find it a bit weird ergonomically that the SQ5’s MMI knob and touchpad are above the shifter so you have to reach over it. The touch pad especially felt a bit awkward in this regard, your photos reminded me of it.

I like Audi, I’m not trying to be a BMW shill, I previously had an S4 and several VWs over the years, but in the end I got the X3 because at a half second faster to 60 the X3 is a lot more fun to drive, and the fit and finish are superb, really stepped up from previous gen X3. It will be interesting to see what Audi does with the SQ5 in coming years, I got the feeling they are not making it better because they’re protecting their Macan tier, in order to get to where my X3 is with a VAG car in this segment I had to jump to Macan GTS, which is about $30k more. Of course you also get more track tuning and prestige with that sticker.

Here’s hoping you guys get an X3 M40i to test, look forward to more CarsTechnica regardless.

I don't know where you're getting that $30k more for the same performamce.

You got a x3 m40i (or a x3 35i) and those start at around 53-54k msrp for the base model... about the same as SQ5 and Macan S....

And the Macan S is faster 0-60 with their PDK... (low 4 seconds, vs mid 4 seconds for BMW, and high 4 seconds for SQ5) not to mention that it's better in the corners and the suspension is set up better so that you don't sag into the corners from body roll while being just as comfortable on a normal road...

Also, the main difference between the BMW iDrive and MMI is the virtual cockpit. The fact that you can have maps and other specific info display right in font of you as a driver makes it better than the iDrive. But iDrive is easier to navigate with the knob without relying on the buttons.

I looked at X3 M40i, settled on one for $65k. I then went to Porsche Audi dealer and test drove some Macans. To get the same features/trim a GTS was $95k. Most of the Macan S models they had were even in the high $70s and 80s.

Sure, you can possibly get a stripper GTS for a few thousand more than a fully loaded M40i, I’ll give you that.

As far as performance, I’ll admit I didn’t take them to the track and verify during my test drives. I’m just going off published specs

SQ5 is 5.1s to 60Macan S (if you include sport chrono package) is 5.0 to 60Macan GTS (again with sport chrono) is 4.8 to 60X3 M40i is 4.6 to 60

Different review mags may come up with different results but it’s hard to compare honestly unless you get them all together on the same day. The manufacturer specs are as fair a data point as any other review.

You’re right, you don’t get the map in the dash, but you do get “other specific info” such as level 2 autonomous driving status and you still get nav info in the HUD. It depends on what you care about but I thought it was kind of a wash between MMI and iDrive, all features considered.

I got stuffed into a Q3 this summer for a rental and it was horrible, abysmal, terrible. I can't imagine this variant be much better. My mother went for an RDX and it was sweet goodness in comparison the the Q3.

Now maaaaybe the Q5 is vastly superior to the Q3 but somehow I suspect its very similar in flavor.

I got stuffed into a Q3 this summer for a rental and it was horrible, abysmal, terrible. I can't imagine this variant be much better. My mother went for an RDX and it was sweet goodness in comparison the the Q3.

Now maaaaybe the Q5 is vastly superior to the Q3 but somehow I suspect its very similar in flavor.

The Q3 design is from 2011 now, it has had some facelifts over the years but it’s worth noting the Q5 reviewed is not only a step up in the model lineup but also a generation ahead.

We just replaced my wife's 2004 Lexus RX330 (with 150k miles on it) and the Audi Q5 was at the top of her list. We also drove the Volvo XC60, the Lexus RX, a Porsche Macan (because I'm a Porsche guy; it was never really in the running), and, believe it or not, the new Mazda CX5.

The Audi did not disappoint. It was nice inside and out. Nice drive, but it was a little disconnected from the road. That's a bad thing for me, but not my wife. Coming from the Lexus though, which had no connection to the road, it was a big improvement.

The Volvo was equally nice. Smooth ride and nice interior. I think the Audi was just a tad nicer inside.

The Porsche would have been my choice, but was never in the running. It was just too small for what she wanted and jumping up to the next size was to big a leap financially.

My wife liked the Lexus because it was familiar. I couldn't stand the pinched nose design, so I did my best to talk her out of it. We've also been less than impressed with the out of warranty costs. Here's some advice for for Lexus owners. Go to the Toyota dealer instead. Same replacement parts, but they will be cheaper. Or find a good independent mechanic.

The Mazda CX5 was the surprise of the group. I wanted to test drive it because of the reviews it's gotten and it is a nice looking SUV. They did a really good job on the exterior and the interior is on par with the luxury brands. The ride is very sporty, for an SUV. I thought for sure my wife wouldn't like it, but she did. It also has just about every techno gadget you could want.

What did we end up with? The Mazda! We just couldn't deny the price difference. 10-20k more for the same, and in some cases less, features. We were able to get the very top of the line AWD model with no feature unchecked for less than 33k. I also got them to throw in a roof rack with cross bars. We could have afforded any of them, but when you take the nameplate away and look at the cars, it opens you eyes.

I was sure she was going to go with the Audi. She had talked about them for a couple of years, knowing the Lexus needed to be replaced. We would have been happy with the Audi, but just couldn't get passed how good the Mazda was. Even forgetting the price difference, it is on par, or maybe just a step back, from the Audi.

So what's the downside to the Mazda? If I'm being honest, it's the nameplate. It seems shallow, but I'll be damn if that name doesn't count for something. We're getting past it, but it's hard. I drive a Lexus and I drive a Mazda get two different reactions. Mazda seems to be moving more upscale across the line though, so maybe it'll become more than "zoom zoom". All I know is this CX5 is a very nice SUV.

If they can't enable SDC yet, how about things like auto-parking, auto emergency braking and so on?

This focus on the cockpit and ergonomics make it appear Audi isn't going to roll out their SDC tech any time soon. Maybe after a 3-year lease, there might be some early deployments but I think they may roll out some of these features in their higher-end cars and/or in other markets.

At least that seems to be the case with BMW, which advertises a model in the UK with remote auto-parking.

I got stuffed into a Q3 this summer for a rental and it was horrible, abysmal, terrible. I can't imagine this variant be much better. My mother went for an RDX and it was sweet goodness in comparison the the Q3.

Now maaaaybe the Q5 is vastly superior to the Q3 but somehow I suspect its very similar in flavor.

The Q3 design is from 2011 now, it has had some facelifts over the years but it’s worth noting the Q5 reviewed is not only a step up in the model lineup but also a generation ahead.

I drove a 2016 Q3 last winter for a week while my TT was in the shop and, after driving the Q5 (and Q7 last year), I realize that it's missing some of the panache of the others. Once the Q3 gets updated, it will go on the review list.

We just replaced my wife's 2004 Lexus RX330 (with 150k miles on it) and the Audi Q5 was at the top of her list. We also drove the Volvo XC60, the Lexus RX, a Porsche Macan (because I'm a Porsche guy; it was never really in the running), and, believe it or not, the new Mazda CX5.

The Audi did not disappoint. It was nice inside and out. Nice drive, but it was a little disconnected from the road. That's a bad thing for me, but not my wife. Coming from the Lexus though, which had no connection to the road, it was a big improvement.

The Volvo was equally nice. Smooth ride and nice interior. I think the Audi was just a tad nicer inside.

The Porsche would have been my choice, but was never in the running. It was just too small for what she wanted and jumping up to the next size was to big a leap financially.

My wife liked the Lexus because it was familiar. I couldn't stand the pinched nose design, so I did my best to talk her out of it. We've also been less than impressed with the out of warranty costs. Here's some advice for for Lexus owners. Go to the Toyota dealer instead. Same replacement parts, but they will be cheaper. Or find a good independent mechanic.

The Mazda CX5 was the surprise of the group. I wanted to test drive it because of the reviews it's gotten and it is a nice looking SUV. They did a really good job on the exterior and the interior is on par with the luxury brands. The ride is very sporty, for an SUV. I thought for sure my wife wouldn't like it, but she did. It also has just about every techno gadget you could want.

What did we end up with? The Mazda! We just couldn't deny the price difference. 10-20k more for the same, and in some cases less, features. We were able to get the very top of the line AWD model with no feature unchecked for less than 33k. I also got them to throw in a roof rack with cross bars. We could have afforded any of them, but when you take the nameplate away and look at the cars, it opens you eyes.

I was sure she was going to go with the Audi. She had talked about them for a couple of years, knowing the Lexus needed to be replaced. We would have been happy with the Audi, but just couldn't get passed how good the Mazda was. Even forgetting the price difference, it is on par, or maybe just a step back, from the Audi.

So what's the downside to the Mazda? If I'm being honest, it's the nameplate. It seems shallow, but I'll be damn if that name doesn't count for something. We're getting past it, but it's hard. I drive a Lexus and I drive a Mazda get two different reactions. Mazda seems to be moving more upscale across the line though, so maybe it'll become more than "zoom zoom". All I know is this CX5 is a very nice SUV.

John

I'm actually glad I read this, I've been looking at something in this class for my fiance and I've mostly been eyeing Volvo/Audi because they're a bit more powerful (not sure why I haven't looked at an X3). How's the CX-5 acceleration/responsiveness wise? I've gotten extremely spoiled with my very powerful daily driver.

All that in-car tech sounds great, but this review fails to disclose whether Audi has fixed it's long-standing design flaw across all models: fitting turn signals but seemingly no mechanism for activating them.

I'm actually glad I read this, I've been looking at something in this class for my fiance and I've mostly been eyeing Volvo/Audi because they're a bit more powerful (not sure why I haven't looked at an X3). How's the CX-5 acceleration/responsiveness wise? I've gotten extremely spoiled with my very powerful daily driver.

The CX-5 is responsive (especially in sport mode), but it's not strong in that category. It's adequate, but you won't be winning any stop light drags. It's behind the Audi and Volvo, but neither of them are speed daemons either. If acceleration is tops of your list, I'd look elsewhere. I didn't look at the X3, but the numbers look pretty good.

I have a 2014 Q5 and I am considering the new one. One thing minor to most but important to me. Can the dealer copy the nav destinations from the old car to the new one?

Maybe it doesn't matter but this new Ultra Quattro is a very sophisticated slip'n'grip system not true awd all the time. Supposedly saves 0.2 l/100km which may matter to some bureaucrat but not to 99% of drivers I bet.

If they can't enable SDC yet, how about things like auto-parking, auto emergency braking and so on?

This focus on the cockpit and ergonomics make it appear Audi isn't going to roll out their SDC tech any time soon. Maybe after a 3-year lease, there might be some early deployments but I think they may roll out some of these features in their higher-end cars and/or in other markets.

At least that seems to be the case with BMW, which advertises a model in the UK with remote auto-parking.

The traffic jam assist is actually the main reason I'm thinking of trading away my CX-5 for a Q5. Austin rush hour is awful. I haven't found any info on it other than it being mentioned in sales guides.

The traffic jam assist is actually the main reason I'm thinking of trading away my CX-5 for a Q5. Austin rush hour is awful. I haven't found any info on it other than it being mentioned in sales guides.

The latest CX-5 has this, but it will disable if your stopped for more than 3 seconds. I'm not sure why they do that, but it's not a big deal to re enable it. Personally, I'm still jittery with letting the car brake for me. It's probably just a trust issue, but my foot hoovers over the brake the whole time. It's not really a better experience for me. Maybe in time I'll learn to like it, but for now I like to be in control.

I'm actually glad I read this, I've been looking at something in this class for my fiance and I've mostly been eyeing Volvo/Audi because they're a bit more powerful (not sure why I haven't looked at an X3). How's the CX-5 acceleration/responsiveness wise? I've gotten extremely spoiled with my very powerful daily driver.

The CX-5 is responsive (especially in sport mode), but it's not strong in that category. It's adequate, but you won't be winning any stop light drags. It's behind the Audi and Volvo, but neither of them are speed daemons either. If acceleration is tops of your list, I'd look elsewhere. I didn't look at the X3, but the numbers look pretty good.

John

For purely power I'm eyeing the SQ5 and (thanks to this thread) the X3 M40i but it really depends on the fiance's opinion. I've gone back and forth on even looking at the Macan (it seems both more expensive and smaller, which is probably a no go).

One of the things that I think Audi should be dinged for (in reviews) is how they keep their driver assistance techs buried in the highest trim level, as an add-on option. Specifically, the traffic jam assist and the adaptive cruise control. Audis aren't super common in the first place, so if you want that option, even large dealerships (which are uncommon) may have fewer than a half dozen to choose from in inventory. Probably very hard to get a test drive of these features unless you're an auto journalist.

Also, with the Q5, if you look at the website and brochure, adaptive cruise control and traffic jam assist aren't there (I couldn't find them). They may have added them in mid-year, though those features are in other Audis.

In contrast, even Toyotas have these features throughout their lineups. If the Audi tech is that great, they should be pushing it, they'd likely be winning over more customers. Also, a driver used to having adaptive cruise control on their Camry is unlikely to want to purchase a new car without it in the future (yes it's a game changer).

This review was OK, but I would have liked more written on the vaunted audi drivers assist features...details are hard to find. Also, why don't the seats fold down flat? I would have also had someone ride in the back seat for their thoughts.

One thing that's crazy, is I find it hard to believe that folks will use the Audi's navigation over google maps (or even apple maps). Would be nice if android-play or car play could pass lane and turn information over to the car so the HUD could work with the phone's navigation app.

Two show-stopping fails for me would remove this from consideration before stepping foot on the showroom floor. First is the glued-on-iPad screen look. It's a total aesthetic fail. Beyond the looks I'd have serious concerns about how much glare a screen mounted there will have to endure.

Second, even if I could get past the screen, the lack of a flat cargo floor with the seats folded is a definite deal killer. Seriously, someone remind Audi what the U in SUV means. I often use my CUV/SUV for hauling more than groceries and both my former Mitsubishi and my current Infiniti have flat cargo floors.

One of the things that I think Audi should be dinged for (in reviews) is how they keep their driver assistance techs buried in the highest trim level, as an add-on option. Specifically, the traffic jam assist and the adaptive cruise control. Audis aren't super common in the first place, so if you want that option, even large dealerships (which are uncommon) may have fewer than a half dozen to choose from in inventory. Probably very hard to get a test drive of these features unless you're an auto journalist.

Also, with the Q5, if you look at the website and brochure, adaptive cruise control and traffic jam assist aren't there (I couldn't find them). They may have added them in mid-year, though those features are in other Audis.

In contrast, even Toyotas have these features throughout their lineups. If the Audi tech is that great, they should be pushing it, they'd likely be winning over more customers. Also, a driver used to having adaptive cruise control on their Camry is unlikely to want to purchase a new car without it in the future (yes it's a game changer).

This review was OK, but I would have liked more written on the vaunted audi drivers assist features...details are hard to find. Also, why don't the seats fold down flat? I would have also had someone ride in the back seat for their thoughts.

Anything in specific you would like to know about it? I can look back at my notes.

Back-seat passengers found it a very comfortable ride, and I think I mentioned in the review that there are climate controls back there. Decent amount of leg room (better than at least one other model).

I can't answer why Audi didn't engineer full fold-down seats. The Stelvio doesn't have them either. I wonder if it's something particular to the mid-sizes? The Q7 and my Chrysler Pacifica, which both have three rows of seats, fold flat. I forgot to check that on the BMW X3 I had this weekend (was for a out-of-town trip, not a review).

Quote:

One thing that's crazy, is I find it hard to believe that folks will use the Audi's navigation over google maps (or even apple maps). Would be nice if android-play or car play could pass lane and turn information over to the car so the HUD could work with the phone's navigation app.

Apple Maps once led me into a very bad neighborhood in East Saint Louis, and Google Maps isn't an option with CarPlay. Audi's GPS is really easy to use with the handwriting recognition, and like you said, it's the only option for heads-up turn-by-turn directions.

The Audi Q5 also competes directly with the Mercedes GLC (and the higher performance SQ5 with the GLC43). Not sure why it's left out of the article. There are plenty of comparison articles and videos via Google search.

For purely power I'm eyeing the SQ5 and (thanks to this thread) the X3 M40i but it really depends on the fiance's opinion. I've gone back and forth on even looking at the Macan (it seems both more expensive and smaller, which is probably a no go).

I didn't test drive the SQ5, but yeah, I think it'll fit your needs. The Macan is small. If space is a concern, just mark it off your list. Take it out for a test drive though. It's a fun little SUV.

My daily driver is a 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland, with a big Hemi V8. I understand wanting power. Getting into a SUV with a V4 is...underwhelming. My wife's CX-5 is fine for driving around town though.

My weekend car is is a Porsche 911 (993 C4). Road hugging at it finest. Honestly though, my wife's 2017 CX-5 is closer to my 911 in handling than my Jeep GC. If handing is a priority, you owe yourself a drive in a Mazda. I definitely look at the brand differently now.

One of the things that I think Audi should be dinged for (in reviews) is how they keep their driver assistance techs buried in the highest trim level, as an add-on option. Specifically, the traffic jam assist and the adaptive cruise control. Audis aren't super common in the first place, so if you want that option, even large dealerships (which are uncommon) may have fewer than a half dozen to choose from in inventory. Probably very hard to get a test drive of these features unless you're an auto journalist.

Also, with the Q5, if you look at the website and brochure, adaptive cruise control and traffic jam assist aren't there (I couldn't find them). They may have added them in mid-year, though those features are in other Audis.

In contrast, even Toyotas have these features throughout their lineups. If the Audi tech is that great, they should be pushing it, they'd likely be winning over more customers. Also, a driver used to having adaptive cruise control on their Camry is unlikely to want to purchase a new car without it in the future (yes it's a game changer).

This review was OK, but I would have liked more written on the vaunted audi drivers assist features...details are hard to find. Also, why don't the seats fold down flat? I would have also had someone ride in the back seat for their thoughts.

Anything in specific you would like to know about it? I can look back at my notes.

Back-seat passengers found it a very comfortable ride, and I think I mentioned in the review that there are climate controls back there. Decent amount of leg room (better than at least one other model).

I can't answer why Audi didn't engineer full fold-down seats. The Stelvio doesn't have them either. I wonder if it's something particular to the mid-sizes? The Q7 and my Chrysler Pacifica, which both have three rows of seats, fold flat. I forgot to check that on the BMW X3 I had this weekend (was for a out-of-town trip, not a review).

Quote:

One thing that's crazy, is I find it hard to believe that folks will use the Audi's navigation over google maps (or even apple maps). Would be nice if android-play or car play could pass lane and turn information over to the car so the HUD could work with the phone's navigation app.

Apple Maps once led me into a very bad neighborhood in East Saint Louis, and Google Maps isn't an option with CarPlay. Audi's GPS is really easy to use with the handwriting recognition, and like you said, it's the only option for heads-up turn-by-turn directions.

That’s interesting, the handwriting for text entry...

I am curious about the traffic jam assist, how long does it take to feel comfortable letting the car stop and go by itself? You hinted at this with the lane assist, it’s unsettling at first—can lane assist track a lane or is it only about preventing lane drift?

One thing I never understood before using adaptive cruise control myself was how and when I’d actually use it! Yes it’s cruse control, but unlike regular cruise I felt like I could use it a lot more not just when on a highway with no one slower in front of me. I was driving a Toyota though, and had to say goodbye when the adaptive cruise disengaged at 35-40mph. Presumably this Audi rides it all the way down to a stop, and that’s completely different from anything almost all of us readers have ever experienced while driving! Is it scary? Do you really miss it in your regular car, and is it worth the Prestige package and add on $1800 driver assistance package? Not to mention it’s harder to strike a good Deal when you need to have them trade for a car that matches your needs rather than taking something from inventory. But with all that would you go out of your way to get that feature or does it sound better than it really is?

Lastly, how does the Q5 reconcile its smoothness and isolation from the road with its sporty options like dynamic suspension setting or Quattro (does this Quattro implementation help move the car around a corner aggressively?). Did you try driving on I-75 at 75 and did the potholes make the Audi weep or was it a champ there too?

I did like your review more when I re read it to respond to your post! Thanks!

I just picked up one of the newly redesigned X3s. I know you guys don’t do shootouts or comparisons really, but I’d be interested to know what you mean about Audi and Volvo blowing away everyone else in instruments and infotainment.

I tested both the SQ5 with digital cockpit and the new X3 with digital dash and they didn’t seem much different. I mean obviously there are differences but as far as features, fit and finish.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen you guys review a BMW though so I’m not holding my breath that we will get a comparison to the Audi or Alfa. Many reviewers are saying the iDrive is now best in its class, I’m not sure I’d go that far but I am surprised about you considering MMI that much better.

I did find it a bit weird ergonomically that the SQ5’s MMI knob and touchpad are above the shifter so you have to reach over it. The touch pad especially felt a bit awkward in this regard, your photos reminded me of it.

I like Audi, I’m not trying to be a BMW shill, I previously had an S4 and several VWs over the years, but in the end I got the X3 because at a half second faster to 60 the X3 is a lot more fun to drive, and the fit and finish are superb, really stepped up from previous gen X3. It will be interesting to see what Audi does with the SQ5 in coming years, I got the feeling they are not making it better because they’re protecting their Macan tier, in order to get to where my X3 is with a VAG car in this segment I had to jump to Macan GTS, which is about $30k more. Of course you also get more track tuning and prestige with that sticker.

Here’s hoping you guys get an X3 M40i to test, look forward to more CarsTechnica regardless.

I don't know where you're getting that $30k more for the same performamce.

You got a x3 m40i (or a x3 35i) and those start at around 53-54k msrp for the base model... about the same as SQ5 and Macan S....

And the Macan S is faster 0-60 with their PDK... (low 4 seconds, vs mid 4 seconds for BMW, and high 4 seconds for SQ5) not to mention that it's better in the corners and the suspension is set up better so that you don't sag into the corners from body roll while being just as comfortable on a normal road...

Also, the main difference between the BMW iDrive and MMI is the virtual cockpit. The fact that you can have maps and other specific info display right in font of you as a driver makes it better than the iDrive. But iDrive is easier to navigate with the knob without relying on the buttons.

I looked at X3 M40i, settled on one for $65k. I then went to Porsche Audi dealer and test drove some Macans. To get the same features/trim a GTS was $95k. Most of the Macan S models they had were even in the high $70s and 80s.

Sure, you can possibly get a stripper GTS for a few thousand more than a fully loaded M40i, I’ll give you that.

As far as performance, I’ll admit I didn’t take them to the track and verify during my test drives. I’m just going off published specs

SQ5 is 5.1s to 60Macan S (if you include sport chrono package) is 5.0 to 60Macan GTS (again with sport chrono) is 4.8 to 60X3 M40i is 4.6 to 60

Different review mags may come up with different results but it’s hard to compare honestly unless you get them all together on the same day. The manufacturer specs are as fair a data point as any other review.

You’re right, you don’t get the map in the dash, but you do get “other specific info” such as level 2 autonomous driving status and you still get nav info in the HUD. It depends on what you care about but I thought it was kind of a wash between MMI and iDrive, all features considered.

Sorry your Porsche dealer tried to gouge you, a well equipped Macan S should be under $60k.

And it’s not the fraction of a second difference to 60 that really matters. Every time I buy a car I always test drive VW, Audi, and BMW VS Porsche and Porsche always sweeps. Even when built on the same VW/Audi platform, there is a huge difference in the suspension components Porsche uses and their cars drive so much better. And the BMWs are usually waddlers, great engines but heavy in the corners. I was so close to getting an M Convertibke but couldn’t handle how heavy it was.

I’ve tried to tell myself the Audi is similar enough to save some money, but I never can. Very happy to pay for the best, even if I have to keep it a few years longer.

I always thought the Q5 looked rather ugly. Drove nice when I test drove one but I ultimately went with an XC60, but I also would have taken a Subaru Outback or Forester over the Audi. There's just something off about the Q series vehicles.

I was behind a Q7 yesterday, we'd had quite a bit of snow overnight, and pulling away at the roundabout, it struggled, spun it's wheels, and went sideways a bit.