If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Buying votes is illegal, yet the misnamed Los Angeles Ethics Commission is proposing to pay people to vote, in the form of lottery prizes. David Zahniser of the Los Angeles Times reports:

Alarmed that fewer than one-fourth of voters are showing up for municipal elections, the Los Angeles Ethics Commission voted Thursday to recommend that the City Council look at using cash prizes to lure a greater number of people to the polls.

On a 3-0 vote, the panel said it wanted City Council President Herb Wesson's Rules, Elections and Intergovernmental Relations Committee to seriously consider the use of financial incentives and a random drawing during its elections, possibly as soon as next year.

Depending on the source of city funds, the idea could require a ballot measure. Commissioners said they were unsure how big the prizes should be or how many should be offered, saying a pilot program should first be used to test the concept.

This is a terrible idea whose time probably has come. The notion that indifferent people, who donít care enough about civic affairs to inform themselves, should be lured to the voting booth is stupid. Voting is a responsibility, and if someone doesnít really care about issues, why should he or she be encouraged to vote? That vote will cancel the vote of someone who does care about politics and did the homework necessary to vote intelligently.

Of course, there is a method to this madness. The progressives have cultivated the process of emotional appeals to the poorly-informed, and depend on ignorance for their power.

High voter turnout is uncritically accepted as a good thing. It long past time for us to launch a counter-campaign, emphasizing that causal voting is stupid. ďIf you donít care, donít bother votingĒ should be the slogan to encourage responsible voting.

It's not how old you are, it's how you got here.It's been a long road and not all of it was paved.A man is but a product of his thoughts. What he thinks, he becomes. Gandhi

Originally Posted by Carol

When I judge someone's integrity one key thing I look at is - How does s/he treat people s/he doesn't agree with or does not like?
I can respect someone who I do not agree with, but I have NO respect for someone who puts others down in a public forum. That is the hallmark of someone who has no integrity, and cannot be trusted.

This HAS to be unconstitutional. You can't pay people for their votes. And in California it's so damned easy to vote: you can be "permanent absentee" and they send a ballot to your house with every election. How freaking hard is that??

This HAS to be unconstitutional. You can't pay people for their votes. And in California it's so damned easy to vote: you can be "permanent absentee" and they send a ballot to your house with every election. How freaking hard is that??

Republicans can't pay people to vote. Democrats can do whatever they want. Oh, and they already pay people to vote. It's called welfare.

It's not how old you are, it's how you got here.It's been a long road and not all of it was paved.A man is but a product of his thoughts. What he thinks, he becomes. Gandhi

Originally Posted by Carol

When I judge someone's integrity one key thing I look at is - How does s/he treat people s/he doesn't agree with or does not like?
I can respect someone who I do not agree with, but I have NO respect for someone who puts others down in a public forum. That is the hallmark of someone who has no integrity, and cannot be trusted.