Dutch Sociologist Falsified Data to Codify Liberalism as Science

One of the things that the left attempts to do is to codify elements of their ideology as “science.” That is what global warming is all about — and many other things as well. Codify liberalism as science, therefore making it irrefutable, making it inarguable — and, of course, they failed. Everybody knows that it’s a hoax. But the attempt is made frequently to codify liberalism as science or some other unquestionable aspect of life that people just accept on the basis of the credibility of the field that we’re talking about.

Of course, science, up until the global warming hoax, had almost perfect credibility. If somebody was a scientist and said something, it was automatically believed, just the way journalists used to be believed. (interruption) What are you frowning at in there? (interruption) Nothing to do with me? What, you got a technical problem in there? (interruption) Oh! We got a technical problem with the screener program. Does that mean that we won’t be able to take calls? (interruption) Oh, okay. Just means you won’t be able to put ’em up for me? I got it. Anyway, there was a very important and major story that we touched on yesterday, but there’s much more information in the latest AP story that makes this story even more pertinent — especially vis-a-vis the scientific “consensus” on manmade global warming.