Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Come
2016, I will have known former FBI agent Geral Sosbee for fifteen
years. I began an investigation of his case in 2001. Since that time,
Geral and I have collaborated on hundreds of reports exposing the
corruption of every branch of the U.S. Government, and its law
enforcement and intelligence services.

Geral
is a person of impeccable credentials, who, now at age 70, has served
his country for more than half a century, always with honor in his
heart. He is a decorated combat veteran (U.S. Army, Vietnam). He
served in the FBI (1971-1978), until he was forced to resign, for
reporting internal FBI crimes and corruption, for honoring his oath
to defend the Constitution.

He
is an attorney (J.D.), and a former judge and prosecutor. Former FBI
Police Instructor (FBI HQ, Quantico). He is a recipient of the
American Jurisprudence Award, and letters of commendation for FBI
service, including his work in defense of civil rights.

When
I say he has served his country with honor for more than half a
century, I include what I consider the most important service of all:
TELLING THE TRUTH about the actual state of affairs in this country,
as a government whistleblower.

Geral
Sosbee has also documented, in great detail, decades of persecution
directed against him by the very government of the country he served
in an official capacity. For those who find it hard to believe that a
man with such credentials and a history of honorable government
service could become the Target of such a brutal (and often bizarre)
campaign, I would ask them to go to his website and READ HIS
DOCUMENTATION, rather than dismissing his case as “unbelievable”.

But
far worse than “unbelievable” is the stigma that government
agents and operatives have been trying to slap on him, since 1978
(the year of his forced resignation), that of “paranoia”, or
“delusional paranoia”. Such a tactic against a whistleblower or
“dissident” is not unusual in the slightest. It has been employed
throughout history, in any repressive, totalitarian regimc, including
in Nazi Germany, in Soviet Russia (KGB), East Germany (Stasi).

The
purpose is to “neutralize” the Target, by at least one of several
tactics, ranging from the ludicrous to the life-threatening.

The
perps of these campaigns use a multi-pronged assault on a Target.
They will enlist any number of persons, from medical doctors to
police (controlled by FBI and CIA), right on down to the lowest
career criminals and street thugs.

The
Target will be harassed, stalked, assaulted (verbally and at times,
physically). He will be accosted with extreme provocations, with the
objective of drawing a response, for which he can then (they hope) be arrested.

If
they can discredit the Target by labeling him/her as “crazy”,
they will use every dirty trick imaginable to accomplish their goal.

Vandalism
of one's property (especially vehicles) occurs on a regular basis, as
well as home invasions, and “black bag jobs”. The perps (agents
of the U.S. Government, or their minions and hirelings) have the
resources, training and technology to wreak havoc and destruction.
The psy war tactics, coupled with material assaults on one's person
and possessions, make it near impossible for the Target to bear the
extreme stress of the ongoing campaign against him.

In
the face of all this evil, this extreme provocation, Geral Sosbee has
remained ethical and law-abiding. He has never responded to these
tactics with any criminal act. He has never been arrested, never
officially accused of any crime.

As
Geral and I have long agreed, the violence done by assaults on one's
mind is as evil –or more so-- than any physical assault.

This
recent report by Geral Sosbee elaborates on previous reports by
Sosbee and Hartwell (links given) on the latest events.

I
first met detective Adrian Posada, Brownsville Texas Police
Department (BPD), when he came to my residence to investigate
vandalism of my residence. On a different occasion I tried to file a
report with Posada on vandalism of my car.

To
my great amazement Posada refused my report. * Here are some of the
details of the meeting with Posada:

Detective Posada (D.P.)
in apparent retaliation against me recently refused to take my and my
wife’s report of vandalism, questioned my sanity and impugned my
veracity, covered up the crime that I reported, made no effort to
investigate the crimes (stalking and vandalism of our car),
apparently began a bizarre investigation of me, intentionally and
repeatedly violated the Texas Open Records laws by not revealing the
data in his possession, and generally engaged in unprofessional
police activities designed at least to intimidate me, or to fabricate
a crime which he might then attribute to me.

On or about December
15-16, 2015, he apparently appeared at the repair shop that fixed the
vandalized headlight and he investigated my activities there. Both he
and the BPD presently maintain that no report exists regarding the
vandalism on my car on November 20, 2015.

On Christmas Eve,
Commander Henry Etheridge(BPD), called me and invited me to file the
report that Posada refused to accept. I advised Etheridge that I
filed the report with the Sheriff when I realized that Posada had not
made an incident report and that Posada insulted me as mentioned
above.

Then, on Christmas day
(today) the top commander of the BPD (James Paschal) calls me and
invites me to come into police headquarters, or permit him to come to
my home, to discuss this matter. I declined and suggested to him that
he might first consider asking Posada about his outrageous and
apparent unlawful actions against me. Meanwhile, I notify the Texas
AG and the local DA of the sordid affair.

Now, I must ask why did
Posada turn hostile against me, who influenced Posada to impliedly
threaten me for (in his deceitful words) 'filing a false police
report', and why did Posada suggest to me to 'take the medication'
for paranoia. I asked BPD internal affairs officer Rolando Vasquez to
inquire, but to no avail.

[NOTE: An important
point, not previously mentioned in Sosbee's reports, is that there
was never any such “medication” prescribed by anyone. The
fraudulent 'diagnosis' was made by a person unqualified to diagnose
any such psychological condition. No such condition exists, nor did
Geral Sosbee ever seek treatment for such a non-existent condition.
Same goes for the non-existent “medication”. – BH]

I believe that someone
illegally and fraudulently influenced Posada to improperly respond to
my request for a police report on the vandalism incident of November
20, 2015, and that Posada assumed the role of criminal investigator
against me on behalf of the same person who thereby prejudiced him
against me.

I suspect that the fbi
is involved in the matter in a manner similar to fbi efforts to
provoke me, or to fraudulently set me up for imprisonment as I have
shown in the following links, two of which involve fbi and UT Police
joint crimes against me on campus.

Note that both Internal
Affairs officer Rolando Vasquez, and a female records clerk are
witness to the tricks by Posada concerning his false statements (as
shown below & as represented in the above Barbara Hartwell link).

EG:

As we were leaving the
building, I asked X for a case number so I could obtain a copy of the
report; he answered, ‘just a moment’. He then went into the
dispatch room to obtain a case number; when he returned, he gave me
his card with a number on it. When I presented the case number to the
records office a few days later, the clerk advised me that the number
that I provided to her was X’s phone number, and that no record
exists regarding my report of vandalism of my car on November 20,
2015.

(X in the above
paragraph refers to Detective Adrian Posada.)

Probably the fbi and
DPS/USPI fed prejudicial or poison data to Posada. See above
affidavit.

"Poisoning the well
(or attempting to poison the well) is a rhetorical device where
adverse information about a target is preemptively presented to an
audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing everything
that the target person is about to say. Poisoning the well can be a
special case of argumentum ad hominem, and the term was first used
with this sense by John Henry Newman in his work Apologia Pro Vita
Sua (1864).[1] The origin of the term lies in well poisoning, an
ancient wartime practice of pouring poison into sources of fresh
water before an invading army, to diminish the attacking army's
strength."

Wikipedia.com.

MALL RATS APPEAR OUT OF
THE WOODWORK

This date the fbi sends
an h/male 24-26 years, 5'10", 170 lbs, sun glasses and cap, to
follow and assault me and my wife in the McAllen, Texas mall. The
thug performs his crime by standing close to us, holding his phone &
pretending conversation; then, he mimics my movements to make sure
that he has my attention. This fbi thug assists the fbi in their
efforts to kill me; he is therefore an accessory to attempted murder.
Such is the character of the fbi which similarly assaults me in
multiple locations for decades and employs 24/7 DEW assaults which a
fbi medical doctor uses to fraudulently label me as paranoid as I
report the symptoms.

FBI CYBER-STALKER RATS
OFFER “SUGGESTIONS”

Now, to the comments
made by the idiots who have been enlisted to harass Geral Sosbee
online. The same operative, using various pseudonyms and silly screen
names, pops up whenever Sosbee posts a report on the Indymedia sites.

The moron here, calling
himself “Zippy the pinhead”, posts:

“What
an opinion worth

Zippy
the pinhead

It
*could be "possible" that nobody order, influenced or made
::::: Posada turn hostile against you, and it *COULD be possible
that nobody influenced Posada to impliedly threaten you for (in his
deceitful words) 'filing a false police report', and

:::::
why did Posada suggest to you to 'take the medication' for paranoia?

It *could be, like I have read here on indymedia by many who
say or suggest: you sound paranoid and need to check your medication
etc.,

The upper brass may be wanting to get this clarified,
And it *could be possible that Posada acted entirely on his own with
no conspiracy of any kind and done in own his ways of interacting,
with you. His way sounds fairly common when I see how lots of the
community interact with you here online in the SAME way.

[FYI}
I live in Portland and only know about you from what I read on
indymedia, [which is a lot] that is posted by you.

I am
not the fbi.

I really don't think that someone "illegally
and fraudulently influenced Posada to improperly respond to you".

Geral
Sosbee:

Zippy
the fbi mouse

Zippy
uses many aliases in his verbal assaults and he is hereby identified
as a serial killer and torturer for the fbi. His other alias is j.
robert upton as presented here:

Zippy/upton
is also a little cowardly mouse who never focuses on facts, but
relies instead on hypothetical speculation which he hopes will
obscure the hard evidence that I present. His handlers in the fbi
have destroyed the USA and I am one of the few former fbi agents who
documents the collapse of the government here.

Furthermore,
Zippy represents the lowest form of human being ever to live on
God's green earth. He is at once subhuman, despicable and pathetic.

Zippy
the pinhead:

All
I said was "could of"

You ignored my suggestion that
he could of not been forced or manipulated in regards to how he
interacted with you. I notice how you immediately jumped on me and call me the fbi, etc.

Saturday, December 26, 2015

In
December, 2012, I was co-hosting a radio program with Dr. Antonella
Carpenter, The Medical Conspiracy, on Orion Talk Radio network. Much
of what we covered on the program concerned COINTELPRO. Dr. Carpenter
had been targeted for a neutralization campaign by the Medical Mafia
and Big Pharma, so there were a series of programs on
counterintelligence tactics, one of the areas of my expertise.

Dr.
Carpenter (like Barbara Hartwell, former FBI agent Geral Sosbee, and
a number of others I have known), has suffered outrageous injustices,
harassment and persecution, which eventually drove her into financial
destitution and homelessness. Her property was stolen or destroyed by
the feds. Her business was raided by the FDA, and thus shut down;
she was later arrested, and finally wrongfully indicted on false
charges. A horrible travesty of justice against a brilliant doctor
whose “crime” (according to the FDA and DOJ) was saving lives of
cancer patients. Dr. Carpenter had previously been persecuted as a
whistleblower while working in the Defense Industry.

This
kind of nightmare is what often happens to government whistleblowers.
Your life will be destroyed, piece by piece. You will lose most
everything you own You will be slandered/libeled and falsely accused.
Unjust and baseless rumors will fly. You will be blacklisted,
personally and professionally. Your relationships with family,
friends and colleagues will most likely be ruined, by abandonment
and/or betrayal, due to pressure applied and/or threats by the perps,
who in these cases are are government agents.

Having
no resources myself, there was not much I could do to support other
whistleblowers, targeted as I was. The one thing I was capable of
doing was to help Dr. Carpenter publicize her case, in attempts to
raise public awareness of her plight, and of what is actually at
stake, not only for the individual whistleblower, but for the larger
issues of human rights and Constitutional protections of those
rights, including freedom to choose one's own health care.

I
give this brief background summary to provide context for some of the
issues covered in this report.

During
that time, I had also been an occasional guest on other radio
programs, as time permitted, one of which was Howard Nema's (aka
Nemaizer) “Truth Talk News”, on which I discussed various
subjects, including COINTELPRO. “Truth Talk News” (as I later
discovered, a misnomer) was broadcast on “Truth Broadcast Network”
(another misnomer), owned by Harry Link.

In
December of 2012, an issue came up which involved Fritz Springmeier,
a very well-known person claiming to be an expert on CIA MK Ultra.
Earlier that year, Howard Nemaizer had requested that I provide him
with some information about Springmeier. I e-mailed him some
documentation, along with a summary of my considered professional
opinion, having conducted investigations on Springmeier and some of
his associates, going back to the 1990s.

Nemaizer
had previously interviewed Springmeier on his TV show, believing him
to be legitimate. But now, he said he was interested in anything
which would give him another perspective as to Springmeier's
credibility. I told him (as I would tell anyone who asked) that he
could not develop an informed opinion or reach a reasonable
conclusion unless he did his own research, that I could only suggest
some areas he could look into.

I
received some e-mails from Nemaizer, in which he stated that he had a
“plan” to “expose” Springmeier by inviting him on a program,
co-hosted by Harry Link and another of his associates, Vincent
Blasone. The “plan” involved using a pretense of supporting
Springmeir, and then setting him up to later be “exposed”.

The
e-mail exchanges that follow are mostly self-explanatory. I have
removed any irrelevant and/or personal information, as well as
certain names, to protect privacy. But, as will become clear, the
issues themselves were (and are) very public.

Hartwell
to Nemaizer:

Got
both messages re Springmeier. I've told you what I know about him,
and some months ago, sent you some documentation from other sources.

In
my opinion, he is a charlatan and a phony Christian, as well as a MC
handler. I've exposed some info on Monarch on my website and have
probably told you more, can't remember what precisely.

I
would not want to be involved in anything re Springmeier myself and
don't have anything to say re Harry or Vinny, it's not my business.

I
don't want my name to be brought into this, but I can't stop others
if that is what they choose to do. My policy is, if someone else
brings up my name publicly (say, Harry or Vinny) I would then
probably address it in a report to set the record straight, and the
same, should "the enemy" (Springmeier) say anything.

All
I would ask, should YOU decide to interview him, is that my name not
be brought up on the air, nor discussed with him off the air. I am
asking this as a friend.

I
have no interest in any kind of "debate" on these issues.
My policy is to expose the liars and shills, not engage them.

Nemaizer
to BH:

"Fritz
clearly has an agenda. I'd like to know what it is. I know he was
working on a new book when Vinny invited him on several months ago.
Incidentally he has posted very positive things about us on his
Facebook page including us as one of his favorite shows he's been on
since his "return".

I
know Harry would like to hit him with some tough questions. Of
course, I would never bring you up, Barbara, neither would Vinny --
and if you were brought up by F.S. I would defend you to the end.

I
must say, I am intrigued. I spoke with Vinny and we both would like
to see where this goes. Very odd. We would like to feel him out then
question him about Alex Jones cointelpro. We know if we hit certain
things like Cisco Wheeler and plagarism he will walk and that would
be that. Looking to give him enough rope to hang himself. Not looking
for an abush, or a love fest. I would like to milk this into 2 even 3
interviews before we hit him with the really tough questions and then
when we've "used" him enough we can ask the really tough
questions and expose the truth about Cisco Wheeler, plagarism and his
associations with cointelpro shills like AJ. What are your thoughts
about our plan?”

BH
to Nemaizer:

No
e-mail in response to this. I simply repeated (as I had told him
before) that I considered his “plan” to be dishonest, and wanted
no part of it. It had nothing to do with me. He seemed to believe
(falsely) that I was somehow involved, which is apparently why he
kept asking for my opinion.

I
also told him I did not want anyone “defending” me. I only wanted
my name to be LEFT OUT of any of his dealings with Springmeier,
including this dishonest plot. And in this case, Nemaizer was not
qualified to “defend” me, since he lacked the knowledge and
experience to know what he was talking about.

Note
that Nemaizer talks of “using” Springmeir to extract information.
No honest exchange of ideas, not even a straightforward discussion,
allowing the so-called “tough” questions to be asked and
answered. This is very telling as to Nemaizer's character. Don't be
honest. “Use” people for what you can “get”, and then spring
a trap after you have mispresented your intentions, insincerely, on
false pretenses.

(Which,
as it turned out, is exactly what Howard Nemaizer later did to me,
with his false pretenses and promises of “sanctuary”, placing me
in a horrible position, even endangering my safety, which resulted
only in more extreme stress, losses and damages from Nemaizer's lies.
I should have seen it coming....)

So,
Nemaizer went ahead, along with Harry Link and Vincent Blasone, and
did the interview with Springmeir. When I watched this interview, it
became clear to me that the hosts had no intention of doing anything
but promoting Springmeier with entirely favorable comments,
sympathetic responses to anything he said, treating him with great
deference, kow-towing and toadying to him, as if he were a heroic
figure, who had earned their admiration and respect.

There
are two ways to view this: 1) They were sincere in their expressions
of “support” for Springmeier, despite their claim that their
“plan” was to set him up. Which would probably mean that they
were operating out of profound ignorance. 2) They were insincere,
laying on the phony praise. Either way, it shows dishonesty, rather
than a search for the truth.

Frankly,
it made me sick. I believe in honesty, no matter the circumstances,
not manipulation and set ups. Do that, and you might as well be
working for the government.

But
they never did “expose” him. The show ended with accolades for
Springmeir from the three toadies. There was also a huge promotion of
Springneier's books, in large banner ads. Nobody watching this show
could ever get the impression that the three hosts were anything but
advocates and supporters of Fritz Springmeier, “True Believers”
in all he was selling.

But
here's the issue for me: What Springmeier claims to be true, and in
fact what he has succeeded, over a period of years, in persuading
large numbers of people to believe, goes against what I KNOW to be
true, personally and professionally, from both direct experience and
extensive investigations, and actually misinforms his large
audiences, most of whom are probably sincerely seeking the truth.

Like
other charlatans selling “Monarch”, never a CIA operation under
MK Ultra, but a sideshow to misdirect attention from the actual
operations, Springmeier has made money off the sale of his books and
tapes, cashing in on the misery of innocent victims of the
government's abuses of human rights.

What
about the people whose children have been horrifically abused and
exploited in government mind control programs? What about genuine,
sincere Christians, seeking the truth about these demonic government
operations? Springmeier touts himself as a Christian minister. Again,
it makes me sick.

As I can attest from personal experience, MK Ultra is hell on earth, a nightmare from which you cannot easily awaken. The damages are extreme and severe, and in almost all cases, permanent, even if one manages to recover some semblance of a "normal" life. I was only delivered by the grace of God, with my sanity and principles intact. (Thank You, Jesus!) Most are not as fortunate.

I
told Dr. Carpenter about the Fritz Springmeier debacle, and about how
I could no longer in good conscience promote anything from Howard
Nema (aka Nemaizer), not his show, nor “Truth Broadcast Network”
where his show aired. We decided to comment on this on Dr.
Carpenter's program, which aired the evening after the Springmeier
interview.

Harry
Link was also promoting Alex Jones. Alex Jones, the notorious
government shill, who had done damage to both Barbara Hartwell and
Dr. Carpenter (as well as many others), with his censorship and
sabotage of our legitimate exposure of information.

Here,
an excerpt from a report (2012):

….Howard
Nema had co-hosted a program on TRUTH TALK NEWS with Vincent Blasone
and Harry Link, an interview with Fritz Springmeier, on December 10,
2012. Springmeier was shortly thereafter heavily promoted by Harry
Link on Truth Broadcast Network, including a large banner which
exclaimed: SPRINGMEIER IS BACK!!! Additionally, there were large
advertisements encouraging the public to buy Springmeier's books.

Considering
the fact that I had thoroughly investigated Fritz Springmeier since
the mid-1990s and long ago reached several conclusions, based on
facts and material evidence, that Springmeier (among other things) is
a charlatan, a false Christian, a mind control handler and a criminal
whose books, articles and radio/video presentations are filled with
disinformation about a number of subjects, most notably government
mind control operations.

Some
time back, in the Spring of 2012, Howard had asked for my opinion on
Springmeier, whom he had interviewed on his program a few times;
these interviews took place before Howard and I were acquainted. In
response to his request, I sent Howard some documentation. And I made
it very clear in several telephone conversations what I thought of
Springmeier and some of his associates, who promote the "Monarch"
project as a CIA operation under MK Ultra, when in fact it was not.

It
is important to state that my knowledge of these issues is based on
my professional background, my extensive personal experience and many
years of research and investigations, as well as my expertise on
counterintelligence operations.

So
frankly, I was outraged when I watched the Springmeier interview on
TRUTH TALK NEWS, in which he was touted as a "political
prisoner" (in fact, he did prison time for bank robbery), and
"mind control expert" (those who consider "Monarch"
to be a CIA operation, out of ignorance, or for an agenda, might
agree, but that does not change the facts.)

Shortly
thereafter, I decided that I could not allow this promotion of
Springmeier to go unchallenged, so I did a show with Dr. Carpenter
(The Medical Conspiracy), on which we exposed the facts about Fritz
Springmeier (aka Victor E. Schoff aka Arthur Alexander Jr. --and yes,
I've seen the forged I.D.s in both those names, of which I may still
have copies in my files, and if I find them, will publish them as
evidence.)

I
also, as a matter of principle, removed the links on my website for
TRUTH TALK NEWS and Truth Broadcast Network. As I explained on the
air, I refuse to promote any network or individual who is promoting
liars, charlatans, disinformation specialists, government shills,
criminals or other wrongdoers. That is my policy and not subject to
compromise.

Before
the Springmeier interview on December 10, Howard had told me he
wanted to "expose" Springmeier on the air, after a series
of interviews, and asked me what I thought about that. What I told
him was that this would not be my way of dealing with anyone; that I
do not condone such a "set up"; and that lastly, I did not
want my name connected to any of this, nor mentioned on the air, nor
used as a "source", should he choose to go through with
this plan, which I considered unwise.

Aside
from this, there were others involved, namely Harry Link and Vinny
Blasone (who unlike Howard, were not my associates or friends). I
explained that I did not want to get in the middle of any of this,
and wanted no involvement whatsoever. And though I refused to give
advice on this matter, when asked, I told Howard the truth about what
I thought: that this would backfire and in the process compromise his
own credibility.

As
it turned out, the consequences I had predicted came to pass. Howard
later told me that I was "right about everything"
(including Springmeier and Laibow) and after much consideration, made
a decision to sever his ties with Truth Broadcast Network.

End
of excerpt.

Now,
here is what happened next, which I did not cover publicly, but which
I find it necessary to address now, considering the circumstances,
being that Howard Nemaizer has added insult to injury by his libelous
falsehoods against Barbara Hartwell.

He
took offense when I addressed the issue of the promotion on “Truth
Talk News” of the charlatan Fritz Springmeier, on Dr. Carpenter's
radio program.

It
was none of Nemaizer's business how I chose to conduct my own
professional work, which had nothing whatsoever to do with him, but he
clearly had the false notion that he had a “say”, given that he
seemed to believe that there was some “team effort” underway.

Shortly
after Dr. Carpenter's program aired, I received a series of irate
phone calls from Howard Nemaizer. He left messages which were
extremely disrespectful, in attempts to pressure me to call him back.
I regarded these calls as harassment, and did not respond.

He
even threatened, in one such message, that he would set up an interview
with Fritz Springmeier, and would confront him with the accusations
from “my source, Barbara Hartwell.” This statement was made in a
very aggressive, even nasty, tone of voice.

This
intrusive, disrespectful behavior should have been the red flag that
alerted me to the true character of Howard Nemaizer. It was the
behavior of an aggressive busybody, trying to horn in on my business,
entirely lacking respect for my personal boundaries.

I
should have cut off communications with him then and there, but
decided that I would give him the benefit of the doubt, by giving him
the opportunity to see the error of his ways. As later became clear,
it was a mistake, one that I have paid for many times over.

I
decided to e-mail Nemaizer, if only to set the record straight, and
to once again clearly state my position.

I
got the following e-mail in response.

Nemaizer
to Hartwell:

“I
understand your position, however, I agreed not to mention your name
on air with FS so I am a bit confused as to why you undermined my
plan and blocked me on skype? I told you exactly what we would do.”

Hartwell
to Nemaizer:

First
of all, I did not block you on skype. I was on another call, and had
no time as I was busy with something else, and I don't use skype for
personal messages, there is no privacy at all. You had asked me to
call, and I would have, as soon as I found time.

I
don't ever use my cell phone, so I keep it turned off. I have asked
people who have the number not to call me on the cell, unless in a
case of emergency. It was only when I turned it on to charge it that
I got your messages this morning.

I
was accused of dodging your phone calls. Not true. And to try to
pressure me to call is not something I would respond to.

I
did not "undermine" anything, and I'm sorry you would
interpret it that way.

Yes,
you had told me about this plan re Springmeier. But please remember,
I was not involved in it in any way. In fact, I told you I refused to
be involved, because I do not condone or participate in "set
ups" of that nature, that is not the way I do things. I am
always direct and blunt, that is how I deal with everything and
everyone.

It
was not my place to tell you what to do, nor to give unsolicited
advice, and there were other people involved, namely Harry Link and
Vinny. They are not my friends, nor even my associates, and I don't
interfere in other people's business, that is my policy. I did not
think this plan was wise, and when you asked for my thoughts, I tried
to tell you it was dishonest and risky, but you chose to go through
with it, and that is your right.

I
had simply asked you, as a friend, not to discuss me with Springmeier
again, nor to allow my name to be part of any discussion on air. As I
told you, I want NO INVOLVEMENT in any way with Springmeier or
anything connected to him, and that is my prerogative.

Springmeier
to me is the enemy, and I made that clear to you from way back. I do
not directly engage my enemies (unless in extreme circumstances where
I am being attacked physically or verbally), and I ask my friends to
please respect my wishes in not discussing me with them, and that is
all I asked.

I
operate independently, always have, always will. I am not a team
player. No one has any say in my decisions except me and I don't
allow myself to be influenced by any consensus of others.

I
have been exposing FS for many years, and investigating him for almost
2 decades. I know what I'm talking about, and I have the
documentation. If someone chooses to take my word for it, they are
free to believe me, or not. I have been repeatedly attacked by
Springmeier's cronies and supporters, and his disinfo has greatly
damaged me and my family in many ways. For me, this is not only
professional, but personal.

So,
no one has the right to expect that I will have a "gag order"
on me, or expect that I will suddenly cease in my work of exposing
criminals/shills/liars, simply because exposing the truth (as I
always do) might be inconvenient with someone else's "plan"
--one that has nothing to do with me.

When
I saw the show with FS, in which it appeared that all of you were
extremely supportive of him, I knew that I could not in good
conscience allow this to go unchallenged. Whatever your plan was, you
still were, in all ways apparent, promoting and supporting
Springmeier. And that disinfo was going out over the airwaves to
anyone watching, who might well believe it to be true.

Then
I saw the big banner ads, promoting FS and the sale of his books.
Yes, I know Harry Link runs TBN, but I knew I could not be associated
with any network that promotes FS, along with Alex Jones. I had no
way of knowing if you were involved, or not. You had not contacted me
during all this time, so I had to go by the evidence which was right
before my eyes.

So
I removed the links to the sites, since I was not going to be
involved in promoting anyone who promotes Springmeier or Jones.

During
the show, Randy said he received a message from you, stating "Barbara
jumped the gun". No, I did not, as I was never INVOLVED in your
plan re Springmeier, and I have the right to comment publicly on
something that has been made public (your show with FS, and the
banner ads and big promotions of FS's books, etc.)

You
may not understand this, but any promotion of FS not only does not
serve the truth, but damages those like me who are telling the truth
about MK Ultra and other related issues. You don't know a fraction of
what has gone on, or what I have been through, because I have not
made it public (for my own reasons), and have only told you a small
part, in confidence.

Re
the Dec 21 show. I heard it advertised by you only a few days ago,
and there was a notice promoting it, but I never received a call from
you to let me know if it was still on. I had already decided not to
be on the show, due to the Springmeier debacle, and had you called
me, I would have told you that, but since I never heard from you, I
just let it go.

Lastly
there is the issue that you said in your phone message that you would
be using my name as a "source" re Springmeier? And make a
video with him? And making assumptions (untrue) that this was what I
wanted?

Not
at all. My original request to you is that you not use my name in any
way, shape or form, in connection with Springmeier. That request
stands. If you want to expose him, as you say, then please do it on
your own, not involving me.

I
do not want my friendship with you to end, regarding something like
this. I would be happy to discuss it with you, but I have no free
time today, or tomorrow, not until after Christmas. I have some very
serious problems of my own to deal with, plus I have not been well.

And
I hope you understand my position on this. If you want to sever ties
with TBN, then that is your choice. Again, it's not my business, that
is between you and Harry Link. But in any case, I don't want any
involvement with his network, because he has shown his true colors,
and I can't condone nor support what he is doing. So I would ask you
to please remove any references to me, or my previous reports you
posted on the site, that is, if they have not already been removed by
Harry.

Howard
Nemaizer's response:

“First
off, I way overreacted and I am very sorry. I do sincerely apologize
for all the misunderstandings on my part regarding last night's show.
Thank you for the clarifications.

I
would never want anything to come between our friendship and mutual
respect. I must say, this has been eating at me.

In
retrospect, you were right all along regarding FS and I should have
listened to your advice not to proceed the way we did. But I will
make amends.

That
said, Harry has pulled AJ off the network (which is still under
renovation) and we had a long discussion about the direction of TBN
and my place in it. I understand your feelings toward Harry and TBN
and realize the way we cat and moused the FS interview and Harry's
actions could have a damaging effect on my own reputation.

That
said, I will be absolutely direct in my actions in the future.
Straight as an arrow, like you. I will expose FS in the future by
asking him the tough questions we were hoping would be asked by
callers.

Of
course I will be doing this on my own, but I would appreciate any
info you can send me regarding him so I can be prepared.

I
am also sorry since I am aware how devastating this FS debacle was to
you, due to your own MK Ultra past and the lies about monarch, etc

My
hope is that you will consider supporting my work on the
www.livestream.com/truthtalknews for I will always support you, your
work and your reputation. I am hopeful we can move forward and
continue our efforts working on projects together in the future.”

So,
Nemaizer apologized to me and acknowledged that he was in the wrong.
But was his apology sincere? Looking back on it, I don't believe so.
Note that he tries to shift blame onto Harry Link, when he was a full
and willing participant in the “plan”. He says he is concerned
about his own reputation being damaged, but did he ever consider the
damage to me, had MY NAME been dragged into his foolishness?

Also,
note that he states:

“That
said, I will be absolutely direct in my actions in the future.
Straight as an arrow, like you. I will expose FS in the future by
asking him the tough questions we were hoping would be asked by
callers.”

Howard
Nemaizer had always told me he admired me for my honesty. I had even
heard him talking about me on his program, stating, “Barbara
Hartwell is the most honest person I know.”

But
like others (former friends) I have known, he clearly does not like
it when my “straight arrow” honesty and bluntness becomes too hot
to handle, when HE is confronted for his dishonest behavior, or when
I state the truth and the facts, even when they may “offend”
someone.

Since
that time, he has publicly accused me of being a “liar” and a
“con artist”, even a “sociopath”, simply because he refuses
to admit his own wrongdoing. He lacks integrity, and rather than make
a REAL effort at honesty, tries to twist things around to blame me
for his own unethical behavior. For that kind of crap, I have a ZERO
TOLERANCE policy.

He
then states:

“I
am hopeful we can move forward and continue our efforts working on
projects together in the future.”

In
fact, I had never worked on any “projects” with Howard Nemaizer.
I had only been an occasional guest on his radio program. Again, he
seems to believe that there was some “team effort”, where none
existed, at least not involving me.

Shortly
after I received this e-mail, I got another. The subject header
stated: “Important NEW information”.

The
e-mail was about another charlatan, one Rima Laibow. This referred to
Laibow, the liar, and her hoax, who stated in a widely promoted
video, “I am Adam Lanza's doctor.” As I stated in a report:
Bullshit!

Nemaizer
jumped on this, believing it was true, as did Harry Link. They
actually set up an interview with Rima Laibow, on “Truth Talk
News”, which they heavily promoted. But after I apprised Nemaizer
that Laibow is a liar and a government shill, married to General
Albert Stubblebine, a perpetrator of massive crimes against persons,
including mind control programs, as well as horrific abuse of anmals,
Nemaizer cancelled the interview.

Here
is my response to Nemaizer's e-mail about “Important NEW
Information”:

You
asked me what I think about this? I'll be blunt, as always, so I hope
you understand.

There
is no "new" information here. This woman is a demon, and so
is her husband, Stubblebine (both listed in my HALL OF SHAME), who
have both been heavily involved in MK Ultra, psy ops and behavior
modification for years.

I
know all about them, and none of it is good.

Their
"natural solutions" are phony. I've already seen these
videos (Alex Jones interview, 2009), and the new one is nothing but a
psy op. I have no reason to believe this woman was Adam Lanza's
doctor, in my opinion that is a lie. Anyone with any discernment,
watching this, will know that and will know who and what she is. But
sadly, most people will not see that and will believe the lies.

They
pretend to be against drugs? Nothing could be further from the truth!

I
looked on Truth Broadcast Network and saw the big promotions for the
Rima Laibow interview on TRUTH TALK NEWS, presented AS IF this were
"truth".

Meanwhile,
people reading this may believe this is "real" when it is
not. Just like the Fritz Springmeier promotions.

I
must say, I don't understand why you would choose to do this, even if
your plan is to "expose" her. Again a false paradigm is
being set up, which people reading TBN could well believe,
attributing credibility where it is not merited. And will compromise
your credibility, in my opinion.

But
as always, that is your right, if that is what you and Harry Link
have decided.

But
again, please do remove all references to my name, including on the
scrolling banner of the TV show. I do not want my name connected to
any of this, and re your show, not until such time (if ever) that you
and I see eye to eye on these matters.

This
is not anything to do with our friendship, it is solely professional
and on principle, so please take this in the way it is intended.

End of excerpt from e-mail.

Following
this, more e-mails from Nemaizer, asking questions, for my opinions,
for advice, etc. Now, talking about how HE was going to “EXPOSE”
Rima Laibow. I was getting very tired of all this, and my patience
was wearing thin, considering that my own circumstances were growing
worse by the day.

So
I sent this e-mail to Howard Nemaizer:

First
I should say that my situation is so bad that most of my time is
spent just trying to survive. I am flat broke with no money for even
the most basic necessities, and am in pain with no way to get relief.
I don't have the option of medical care, as I can't even afford to
buy food. Other people are ill? Most can get help, where I cannot.

To
add to this nightmare, I am currently snowed in and my car has been
blocked in by a wall of snow, I haven't been able to get out for
days, have no money to hire a plow and have not been able to get any
help. Sorry, but I am not in any shape to get into heavy discussions
on all this, not at this time.

The
only thing I can tell you is that you have chosen a path which I
cannot condone and do not agree with. But I can't advise you, as our
viewpoints are so far apart I don't see any common ground. I don't
allow myself to get into conflicts or arguments with people, it is
too stressful and I don't try to impose my views on others.

But
I can give you a few ideas to consider, which you can take or leave.

In
my opinion, you have aligned yourself with a person, namely Harry
Link, who does not hold the principles to defend truth, no matter the
consequences, but will exploit anything in order to draw publicity
for his own agenda.

Frankly,
I don't have any respect for him, and have now seen enough to know
that I want no dealings with him and no association with his network.

How
can someone promote such obvious disinformation and claim he is all
about truth?

As
far as exposing the bad guys, my way is to do a thorough
investigation and present my findings in a report, and/or on the air.
An investigation takes time, so if you are rushing in attempts to
"expose" someone, you won't have enough solid information
or facts to make a valid case.

Speaking
for myself, I do not engage the bad guys directly, nor do I play any
kind of games, such as presenting false information in order to lure
someone into a trap.

If
you really believe you must confront them directly on the air in
order to expose them, then I can't advise you. However, presenting
disinformation ahead of time, as part of this set up, is not
something I believe in. That is a compromise of the truth, and can
only as a result compromise the credibility of the person engaging in
such tactics.

This
is 'the ends justify the means' philosophy and it does not serve
truth.

The
way I see it, there is only one weapon to be used against the bad
guys: UNADULTERATED TRUTH. Without that, you are fighting a battle
you can never win. To quote Sun Tzu (Art of War): Know the enemy and
know yourself.

First,
I would free myself from any alliances where you do not have complete
sovereignty, where you don't have to change your ideas or compromise
your principles in order to work with anyone else.

That
is what I have done, a long time ago, and it is the only thing that
has ever worked for me. When you have to constantly confer or argue
with someone who does not serve truth, or you are "at the mercy"
of someone because you are dependent upon them in any way, it drains
your energy, warps your priorities and stops you from standing up for
the right thing and ultimately, defending TRUTH.

But
that is me, and my way.

I
truly hope you will find a way that works for you, but I believe you
will have to find it on your own, through some direct revelation, not
from the advice of others, including me.

Lastly,
ask yourself: What would Jesus do? Would He promote disinformation,
even for a minute, in order to "expose" the enemy? Or would
He call out the enemy and admonish them for their lies, and their
demonic behavior?

You
are my friend, Howard, and I don't want that to change. I can't
support some of what you are involved in, but know that I still
support YOU, as my friend and Brother in Christ. But I have told you
all I can for the time being, so please take it for what it is worth.

End
of excerpt from e-mail.

The
evidence presented here shows that I gave Howard Nemaizer every
opportunity to understand my position on various issues. I also told
him the truth, whenever he asked for my opinion. I repeatedly gave
him the benefit of the doubt, and accepted his apologies for his
indiscretions, believing them (at the time) to be sincere.

But
what Howard Nemaizer eventually revealed to me, through his words and
actions, is that he is fueled by self-serving personal ambition,
rather then by the desire to do the right thing, to serve the truth,
no matter the consequences.

It
also became clear to me that he did not even seem to “hear” what
I was actually saying, on any number of occasions, which was always
based on principle. Instead of considering principle, he interpreted
everything through pragmatism, by how it would serve HIM and HIS
interests, HIS agenda, which it became clear was to make a name for
himself, to seek public attention and approval, when he did not have
the knowledge or experience as a basis for such an achievement. He thought he could ride my coattails to gratify his ego and glorify himself at my expense.

Instead
of showing a willingness to learn, from others who DO have the
knowledge, the hard-won personal/professional experience and
expertise, and who hold the necessary principles to serve truth, he
bulldozed ahead, scavenging from the legitimate work of others,
trying to make himself APPEAR to be an authority or expert on issues,
where in fact he so obviously lacks understanding that he only
exposes himself as a pretentious fool.

I
left off in the last report with Howard Nemaizer's phony comment to
me in his latest public smear piece:

“If
you truly are a sovereign child of God, Barbara and not a CIA
disinformation agent, do what Jesus would do. Turn the other cheek as
I am going to do–and get on with your life.”

“Lastly,
ask yourself: What would Jesus do? Would He promote disinformation,
even for a minute, in order to "expose" the enemy? Or would
He call out the enemy and admonish them for their lies, and their
demonic behavior?”

Now,
I have this to say to Howard Nemaizer:

How
dare you, you aggressive, obnoxious, self-serving little punk!

Nemaizer
accuses me of being a “CIA
disinformation agent”, when he knows damn well this is untrue. No,
he tries (as usual) to twist things around and blame me for his own
dishonesty, aggression and the outright idiocy of some of his
promotions, when all this started simply because I exercised my RIGHT
to protest his misrepresentation and exploitation of MY NAME and
website for his own unscrupulous ends.

Which
he continued to do, even after I publicly demanded that he REMOVE the
false and fraudulent information and notices in connection with my
name. To this day, no public apology. No public retractions of his
fraudulent promotions, going on for more than two years, as the
damages continue to mount to my good name. Only more lies, more
character assassination. More monstrous invasions of my privacy and now, even
that of my family, who are not involved in any way.

If
Howard Nemaizer is really so blind and/or so stupid as to think I will allow him to
get away with the arrogant, dishonest, and utterly despicable
offenses he has committed against a person who has never once done
anything wrongful to him, he will be hit right between the eyes with
the true meaning of “straight arrow” honesty, in word and deed.