Quantum Teleportation: Nobel Prize Winning Scientist Teleports DNA From One Location To Another

The
world of science is undoubtedly becoming more mysterious by the day. This is exemplified
by multiple discoveries within the realms of quantum physics, parapsychology,
and more — discoveries that have challenged (and continue to challenge) the
current framework of accepted scientific knowledge. This kind of shift in
ideology has happened many times over the course of our history; when the
world instantaneously became round from flat, the majority of people were in
disbelief and labelled the new theory’s proponents as blasphemers.

Another
great example is teleportation, as several interesting findings within this
field seem to be (at least partly) turning science fiction into science fact.

The
title asserts that he teleported DNA. It seems, as with other “fringe” topics
when it comes to science, phenomena like this receives harsh criticism and
resistance from a still decent sized part of science. That being said, did he
really teleport DNA? Given his reputation and credibility, combined with all of
the studies done in various types of teleportation, the black budget and more,
I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt.

DNA
Teleporting Itself

Nobel
Prize winning scientist Luc Montagnier, previously known for his work on HIV and
AIDS, claims to have demonstrated that DNA can be generated from its teleported
“quantum imprint.” This is a discovery that, were the scientific
community to get on board, would represent “the most significant experiments performed in the past
90 years, demanding re-evaluation of the whole conceptual framework of modern
chemistry,” (source) according to theoretical chemist Jeff Reimers
of the University of Sydney, Australia.

In
the experiment, two adjacent but physically separate test tubes were placed
within a copper coil and subjected to a very low frequency electromagnetic
field of 7 hertz. The apparatus was isolated from Earth’s natural magnetic
field so there was no interference. One tube contained a fragment of DNA
(approximately 100 bases long) and the second one contained nothing but water.
(source) (source) (source) (source)

After
approximately 17 hours, the gene fragment (according to Montagnier) was
recovered from both tubes, even though one should have just contained water.

Although
Montagnier’s claims have received harsh criticism from various scientists,
there was a general consensus that his results should be investigated further.
For example, Giuseppe Vitiello, of the University of Salemo in Italy, is
confident that the experiment is reliable.

Greg
Scholes, from the University of Toronto, Canada, who last year demonstrated
that quantum effects occur in plants, said that “the biological experiments do
seem intriguing, and I wouldn’t dismiss them.” (source)

Today,
numerous teleportation breakthroughs have been made. One example comes from the
work of Professor Rainer Blatt at the University of Innsbruck. He and his
colleagues were successfully able to perform teleportation on atoms for the
first time. Their work was published in the journal Nature. (source)

Another
study, published by a team of University of Queensland physicists in the
journal Nature
in 2013, demonstrated successful teleportation with solid state
systems. (source) This
is a process by which quantum information can be transmitted from one place to
another without sending a physical carrier of information. This is made
possible through the phenomenon of entanglement.

A
team from the Joint Quantum Institute (JQI) at the University of Maryland (UMD)
and the University of Michigan has succeeded in teleporting a quantum state
directly from one atom to another over a substantial distance. (source)

There
are different categories of teleportation. Another types of teleportation apart
from quantum is psychic, which is the conveyance of persons or inanimate
objects by psychic means.

“It became known to myself, along with several colleagues
both inside and outside of government, that anomalous teleportation has been
scientifically investigated and separately documented by the Department of
Defense.” (source)

– Eric Davis, Ph.D,
FBIS

A
paper published in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in September 1981, in
the journal Ziran Zazhi
(Nature Journal), reported that
“gifted children” were able to cause the teleportation of
small, physical objects from one place to another. Objects included watches,
horseflies, other insects, radio micro-transmitters, photosensitive paper and
more. The paper, titled “Some
Experiments on the Transfer of Objects Performed by Unusual Abilities of the
Human Body” (Shuhuang et al., 1981), reveals
that participants never touched the objects beforehand. The experiments
were done under both blind and double-blind conditions, and the researchers involved
came from various colleges and sectors of the Department of Defense.

Furthermore,
scientists have conducted studies on people in the lab which produced
remarkable results, observing people describe physical objects
that had been hidden in a remote location. (source)

The
list of strange things reported in the world of science is never ending, and I
believe the ‘politicization’ of academia and publications, as well as the ‘black budget‘ world, are important things to think about
when it comes to the world of science, what research gets published, and what
our minds are willing to explore – regardless of how hard it might be to
accept.

Quantum
Entanglement Verified:

Why Space Is Just the Construct
That Gives the Illusion of Separate Objects

“Space is
just the construct that gives the illusion that there
are separate objects”

–Dr. Quantum (see
video below)

There
is a phenomenon so strange, so fascinating, and so counter to what we believe to
be the known scientific laws of the universe, that Einstein himself could
not wrap his head around it. It’s called “quantum entanglement,”
though Einstein referred to it as “spooky action at a distance.”

An
experiment devised by the Griffith University’s Centre for Quantum Dynamics,
led by Professor Howard Wiseman and his team of researchers at the university
of Tokyo, recently published a paper in the journal Nature Communications confirming
what Einstein did not believe to be real: the non-local collapse of a
particle’s wave function. (1)(2)

Wiesmen
stated that:

“This phenomenon is the strongest yet proof of the
entanglement of a single particle, an unusual form of quantum entanglement that
is being increasingly explored for quantum communication and computation.” (1)

They
did this by splitting a single photon between two laboratories, and testing
whether measurement of it in one laboratory would actually cause a change in
the local quantum state in the other laboratory. In doing so, researchers
were able to verify the entanglement of the split single photon.

Wisemen
went on to state that:

“Einstein’s view was that the detection of the particle
only ever at one point could be much better explained by the hypothesis that
the particle is only ever at one point, without invoking the instantaneous
collapse of the wave function to nothing at all other points. However,
rather than simply detecting the presence or absence of the particle, we used
homodyne measurements enabling one party to make different measurements and the
other, using quantum tomography, to test the effect of those choices.” (1)

So what is
going on here? Either information is travelling faster than the speed of light,
or, the vast distance we perceive between the objects really doesn’t exist at
all! Either possibility is mind altering.

In
quantum mechanics, one or more particles can be described as a wave function
that spreads over extremely large distances, but never detected in two or more
places. Nonlocality refers to measurements that are made at the smallest,
microscopic levels. When scientists examine matter at this level, the laws of
classical science, or “classical mechanics,” seem to be thrown out of the
equation, and long held notions about the nature of reality don’t seem to
apply anymore. This is what has baffled scientists for decades.

Collapse
of the wave function occurs when an observer is introduced. In essence, the
very act of measurement changes that which is being measured. This is best
illustrated by what is known as the “quantum double slit experiment.” You can
see an example of that from Dr. Quantum, here.

Particles
are in many places at once, and exist in multiple probable states. This means
that, as seen in the video linked in the paragraph above, if an electron was
fired through two slits at a screen, it would go through both of them. However,
once you introduce an observer (cameras, measurement), the particle only
goes through one of the slits, rather than both. The very act of measurement,
again, collapses the wave function.

A
paper published in the peer-reviewed journal Physics Essays by Dean Radin, PhD, explains
how this experiment has been used multiple times to explore the role of
consciousness in shaping the nature of physical reality. It’s a great
example of how the simple act of observation collapses the quantum wave
function. (3)

Some
physcisists have felt that other physicists have taken these findings and drawn
absurd conclusions about consciousness and the nature of reality, like this
one:

A fundamental conclusion of the new physics also
acknowledges that the observer creates the reality. As observers, we are
personally involved with the creation of our own reality. Physicists are being
forced to admit that the universe is a ‘mental’ construction. Pioneering
physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: ‘The stream of knowledge is heading toward a
non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought
than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder
into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor
of the realm of matter. Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The
universe is immaterial-mental and spiritual.'”

“I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter
as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness.
Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing,
postulating consciousness.”

– Max Planck, theoretical
physicist who originated quantum theory, which won him the Nobel Prize in
Physics in 1918

“It was not possible to formulate the laws of quantum
mechanics in a fully consistent way without reference to consciousness.”

-Eugene
Wigner, theoretical physicist and mathematician. He received a share of
the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1963.

We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and
links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search
engines and helps spread your info further!

This site is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT
(unless an individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright
holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted
& encouraged - if you give attribution to the work & author and include
all links in the original (along with this or a similar notice).

Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or
mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web –
but remember attribution!

If you like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too
small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible
worlds…

1 comment:

Read the book, "Love and Pain" by Thaddeus Golas. His theory helps to explain this possibility. I have never understood why that book has not become well-known. Perhaps because it was not well promoted, or perhaps because the truth is hard to hear as it dispels long-treasured beliefs.http://www.seedcenterbooks.com/theseedcenter/

Follow New Illuminati on Twitter

SUBSCRIBE to the NEW ILLUMINATI YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Contact Us

Welcome to the new Enlightenment, an era when suppressed science, hidden history and the enlightening nature of reality are all revealed to those with eyes to see and ears to hear.

These are the thoughts and ideas of New Illuminati - bold forerunners and pioneers of new awareness all over the globe.

Notes on new emerging paradigms from the NEXUS New Times Magazine Founder R. Ayana, who lives in a remote Australian rainforest (and is no longer involved with the magazine) - Catching drops from the deluge in a paper cup since 1984.

§ 107.Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright – reproduction for non-profit use is OK. Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.

Claimer

All opinions, facts, debates and conjectures xpressed herein are xtrusions of macrocosmic consciousness into your field of awareness. The New Illuminati are not to be held responsible or accountable for flashes of insight, epiphany, curiosity, transformation or enlightenment experienced by any person, human or otherwise.