ABSOLUTE ZERO UNITES! is a blog exposing dangerous cyber-bullies and cyber-terrorist organizations who target Registered Citizens, featuring groups or people like Perverted-Justice, Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst, No Peace For Predators, Anonymous, and other online terrorists.

Thug jailed for attacking sex offender — weeks after boasting about cushy life in prison

JAIL BOAST YOB CAGED AGAIN Thug jailed for attacking sex offender — weeks after boasting about cushy life in prison
Jack Brooks, 24, was last month pictured in his comfortable cell with Sugar Puffs, a Sony PlayStation and a CD player

11th March 2017, 2:59 am

A THUG who dropped a TV on a sex offender’s head has been jailed again — just weeks after The Sun published pictures of him boasting about his cushy life in prison.

Jack Brooks, 24, who was released on licence, was last month shown in his comfortable cell with Sugar Puffs, a Sony PlayStation and a CD player in Lancaster Farms prison.

He posted the snaps on Facebook while locked up for armed robbery in February 2015.

Brooks was hauled before the courts again after admitting assault causing actual bodily harm on February 3 while on parole at a hostel in Accrington, Lancs.

Prosecutor Alex Mann said Brooks claimed he assaulted the victim as he had heard he raped a child, he was a “dirty b******” and he thought he deserved it.

ELKHORN—A Walworth County prosecutor asked a judge Wednesday to disqualify the defense attorney for a Whitewater man charged with murder because the attorney might be called to testify as a witness.

Alan M. Johnson, 32, has pleaded not guilty to first-degree intentional homicide and armed burglary charges. He is accused of fatally shooting his brother-in-law, Ken Myszkewicz, 43, on Oct. 25 after breaking into Myszkewicz's Whitewater house.

Assistant District Attorney Diane Donohoo argued in her motion that Johnson's attorney, Scott McCarthy, a former Rock County district attorney, should be disqualified because he is a witness to two critical elements in the case.

The first element concerned what Johnson told police and later McCarthy, according to the motion.

Johnson originally told detectives he knew nothing about the Myszkewicz's shooting death, according to court documents.

Johnson later confessed to detectives and told his father, whose gun he allegedly used, that he went to Myszkewicz's house to kill him and then commit suicide.

Court documents filed by McCarthy on Jan. 26 outline what Johnson later told McCarthy: that he went to the house to search for child pornography that he believed was on a computer belonging to Myszkewicz, a man who had physically and sexually assaulted him as a child.

Johnson said he discovered child pornography on Myszkewicz's computer five or six years ago. He chose not to report it because he was afraid of Myszkewicz and the discovery could “potentially tear apart his family,” according to McCarthy's Jan. 26 motion.

Johnson eventually reported what he found in April 2015, but authorities told him the information was dated and law enforcement did not have enough evidence, according to copies of Walworth County Sheriff's Office reports in the Jan. 26 motion.Deputies told Johnson to return if he found more information.

McCarthy sent an email to Donohoo on Dec. 2, telling her that Johnson had told him he went to Myszkewicz's house to “find the evidence to finally put him (Myszkewicz) away to prison,” according to the motion.

“Alan was searching Myszkewicz's computer when Myszkewicz showed up. Myszkewicz was a monster,” McCarthy wrote to Donohoo. “That certainly does not justify vigilante justice, but that is not what happened here.”

Donohoo wrote in the motion that McCarthy would need to testify because of Johnson's inconsistent statements to police.

“The state would be using Johnson's own attorney to prove that Johnson's testimony is not credible,” Donohoo wrote in the motion. “This would cause a mid-trial crisis because Johnson would then need to have another attorney appointed to represent him in order to perform the task of cross-examining McCarthy.”

ELKHORN—A Walworth County prosecutor asked a judge Wednesday to disqualify the defense attorney for a Whitewater man charged with murder because the attorney might be called to testify as a witness.

Alan M. Johnson, 32, has pleaded not guilty to first-degree intentional homicide and armed burglary charges. He is accused of fatally shooting his brother-in-law, Ken Myszkewicz, 43, on Oct. 25 after breaking into Myszkewicz's Whitewater house.

Assistant District Attorney Diane Donohoo argued in her motion that Johnson's attorney, Scott McCarthy, a former Rock County district attorney, should be disqualified because he is a witness to two critical elements in the case.

The first element concerned what Johnson told police and later McCarthy, according to the motion.

Johnson originally told detectives he knew nothing about the Myszkewicz's shooting death, according to court documents.

Johnson later confessed to detectives and told his father, whose gun he allegedly used, that he went to Myszkewicz's house to kill him and then commit suicide.

Court documents filed by McCarthy on Jan. 26 outline what Johnson later told McCarthy: that he went to the house to search for child pornography that he believed was on a computer belonging to Myszkewicz, a man who had physically and sexually assaulted him as a child.

Johnson said he discovered child pornography on Myszkewicz's computer five or six years ago. He chose not to report it because he was afraid of Myszkewicz and the discovery could “potentially tear apart his family,” according to McCarthy's Jan. 26 motion.

Johnson eventually reported what he found in April 2015, but authorities told him the information was dated and law enforcement did not have enough evidence, according to copies of Walworth County Sheriff's Office reports in the Jan. 26 motion.Deputies told Johnson to return if he found more information.

McCarthy sent an email to Donohoo on Dec. 2, telling her that Johnson had told him he went to Myszkewicz's house to “find the evidence to finally put him (Myszkewicz) away to prison,” according to the motion.

I place a bet here that Creep Catchers has just trolled us now that a new lawsuit over civil rights abuses are at play here. one of these Creep Catchers was a fugitive in Canada for another charge and its assaulting Drug Dealers and Robbing Drug addicts. And another person was being accused of arson.

Now Creep Catchers has been sued again. Damn Creep Catchers seem to always start a new scandal as a way to distract us from the last scandal. Im not sure how low these people can get at this point. Oncefallen at this point the only way we can see Creep Catchers fall down is if they become the Canadian version of Isis or the Alt-Right Militia. Or become the Canadian version of the KKK.

TWO men have been accused by a sheriff of taking part in “vigilante action” after beating up a man on the doorstep of a support unit.

Stephen McGlashan, 21, of Pappert, Bonhill, and James Paton, 31, of Main Street, Alexandria, both appeared at Dumbarton Sheriff Court on Tuesday, March 14 on indictment.

They admitted repeatedly punching a man on the head on August 18 2016, at Blue Triangle, Braehead.

Paton further admitted committing the offence while on bail on July 25 from Dumbarton Sheriff Court.

Fiscal depute Sarah Healing outlined the circumstances of the case.

She said: “The locus on the indictment is the Blue Triangle. The accused, Stephen McGlashan, was in his girlfriend’s mother’s house, including James Paton.

“During the course of late afternoon into evening they were alerted by neighbours that the complainer had approached different young girls asking them ‘go with him’ for money”.

The court was told how a witness was at the location because he was visiting a friend but McGlashan and Paton were outside, along with a number of other individuals who were not involved.

“They were shouting at the complainer,” said Ms Healing.

“Someone from the accused’s group was heard to shout “he’s a f****** paedo”.

The victim was attacked by the duo and police and an ambulance were summoned after staff at the premises became alarmed.

The court was also told how police and an ambulance arrived a short time later but they “found it difficult” to obtain information from the victim.

Ms Healing continued: “The victim was taken to the RAH. He had two lacerations above his left eye and some bruising on his left eye.

“He was asked for an X-ray but he did not co-operate.

“The lacerations were glued after which he was admitted for a short period for observation.”

Having viewed CCTV police picked up McGlashan and Paton.

When cautioned and charged McGlashan said he “didn’t agree” with the nature of the charge, while Paton uttered “b*******” when he was charged.

Sheriff Maxwell Hendry said: “This appears to be vigilante action.”

Deferring sentence until April 12 to obtain a criminal justice social work report and a restriction of liberty assessment the sheriff said to both men in the dock: “I want to know as much as I possibly can to select an appropriate punishment – and punishment is coming.”

An Australian guy is being detained for yes playing the Creep Catchers card and interviewing an alleged victim for exploitation purposes.

THE administrator of a Facebook crime group who live streamed a video of himself interviewing a young child about an alleged sexual assault has been released on probation.

Trevor James White, 31, posed as an undercover police officer when he went to a Palm Cove woman’s house in June last year and spoke with her five-year-old daughter about an alleged incident which he broadcast on the FNQ Cairns Crime Updates social media page.

It was viewed by about 400 people.

Crime blogger Trevor James White, 30, who is facing child exploitation charges.He had pleaded guilty to impersonating police, plus the making and distribution of child pornography in the Cairns District Court on Monday prior to today’s sentence.

The court heard he was earlier drinking with the girl’s mother, then convinced her that he was a “secret agent” before he woke up the child and asked her a series of questions including whether she had been “penetrated”.

Crown prosecutor Brendan Manttan described the incident as a “gross invasion” of the child.

Trevor-James White, 30, who has been charged over a live Facebook interview he conducted with an alleged child sexual abuse victim.

Crime blogger Trevor James White, 30, who is facing child exploitation charges.“(It) was made more serious by the broadcasting of that video online,” he said.

Defence barrister James Sheridan said his client had been heavily intoxicated when the offence took place and had been “living with regret” since it occurred.

“He accepts in hindsight that what he did was detrimental to the child,” he said.

The court heard White has suffered serious depression and had problems with alcohol which were exacerbated after getting a job at Dan Murphy’s for five years.

Holy Shit this Murder case will be crazier and the special treatment card is at play here.

The other two defendants didn’t set motion for bail and it’s because they didn't have any capability” to pay, said Wagstaffe, adding that “$35 million is the same as no bail for them.”He said Li had the capability to make bail because she has a “very, very wealthy” family in China.

The posted bail may be unprecedented in San Mateo County, but not in murder cases, said Li’s attorney, Geoff Carr. California law requires twice the amount of bail if property is used instead of money.Li’s parents live in China and are financially successful because of real estate, Carr said.Prosecutors charge that Li instructed her boyfriend, Bayat, and Adella to kill Keith Green, the 27-year-old father of her two daughters, and get rid of the body.Li, who lived in a mansion in Hillsborough, was arrested May 21, a little more than three weeks after Green disappeared. Police said Green was supposed to meet Li at a Millbrae pancake house April 28 but never returned home. A hiker found his cell phone the next day in Golden Gate Park in San Francisco.For two weeks, Green’s disappearance was treated as a missing-person case. But on May 11, Sonoma County sheriff’s deputies found his body in a field off Highway 101 near Healdsburg. An autopsy confirmed that he was the victim of a homicide, authorities said.

Woman charged in Peninsula murder released on bailMedia: sravani@sfchronicle.com / San Francisco ChronicleBayat is the one who allegedly shot Green to death, according to court documents.Though Li and Green were involved in a custody dispute over their children, prosecutors have not revealed an alleged motive for the killing.Friends and family members of Green, including his mother, were sitting in the courtroom wearing blue T-shirts with Green’s face and large, black letters spelling, “Justice for Keith.” They were floored that Li would be released on bail, said Angela Dunn, a family spokeswoman. “It’s just incredible,” she said.Li walked into the courtroom with her head down and dressed in a red jail-issued jumpsuit. She sat quietly next to her attorney as they awaited the judge’s decision.It is unclear whether she will have visitation with her two children, whom she has not seen since being jailed. Her lawyer said Li speaks to them by phone.Prosecutors are concerned that Li will be a flight risk and raised the possibility in earlier arguments. Wagstaffe said his office had requested bail be set at $100 million because of fears that Li will flee the country once she is out of jail.Before being released from jail, Li was fitted with an electronic monitor shackled to her ankle and was expected to turn over her passports.State Assemblyman Rob Bonta, D-Alameda, who introduced legislation in 2016 calling for an alternative to the cash-bail system, said Li’s is the highest posted bail he’s heard of.“I think this extreme ... example really draws attention to the fact that our bail system is broken,” Bonta said. “It’s a system based on wealth.”

People have been warned about "taking the law into their own hands" after live broadcasts of vigilante groups targeting suspected groomers were streamed on the internet.Kent Police said this could hinder investigations and harm the innocent.One confrontation saw a brawl erupt at Bluewater on Sunday. The group involved, The Hunted One, has since said it will not show live stings.A man has appeared in court following the incident.Two other men have been charged with public order offences.Ch Supt Thomas Richards, head of Kent's public protection unit, said: "We do have significant concerns about people taking the law into their own hands and the methods they use, and in some cases acting outside of the law, and would strongly advise against getting involved in, or setting up activities to entrap those suspected of intending to commit offences," he said."Although seemingly well-meaning, this can significantly hinder our work, compromise ongoing investigations and negate months of investigative work."There is also the risk that it can potentially identify people who are completely innocent and mistakenly associate them with grooming offences."Mr Richards said it could also put vulnerable people at risk of harm.Targeting offenders and keeping children safe was a top police priority, he added.In a Facebook post, The Hunted One said: "We have decided that in moving forward that we will no longer be going live for the stings as we don't want cases and evidence ruined after all our hard work in collecting the information."The group said the safety of its team and the public was "paramount".

The law on vigilante paedophile groups gathering evidenceAnyone can gather evidence of alleged criminal wrongdoing as long as they don't break any laws, but officers have 'significant concerns' about people taking the law into their own hands.Following the rise of vigilante paedophile groups it is feared that poor evidence could lead to case against a suspect collapsing in court.And there are worries that the groups could alert suspects to the fact that they are being watched, and prevent police gathering their own evidence.However, the groups claim they have put hundreds of paedophiles in jail.Earlier this month they praised a ruling at Newcastle Crown Court that will allow them to carry on posing online as children to catch predators.It came after lawyers acting for two men caught by the Dark Justice organisation argued that the use of this kind of evidence 'diminished the integrity of the court process'.They also said the groups should be regulated, but a judge ruled there was no legal requirement for controls to be imposed on the groups' activities.Police use covert techniques to identify paedophiles and urge people to tell them if they have information or evidence of online grooming.And officers have warned against the public entrapping those suspected of intending to commit offences.

“There is also the risk that it can potentially identify people who are completely innocent and mistakenly associate them with grooming offences.

“I would add that whilst police have resources and expertise to protect the vulnerable and people with mental health issues, members of the public generally do not, and can cause such individuals to be placed at serious risk of harm.”