The un-Democratic party could have learned, could have make the right choice, the democratic choice… but they didn’t. Instead they are trusting their spin superpowers to convince the left that 2+2 CAN equal 5 if you want it bad enough. And unfortunately it may just work.

You must remember that the desire of the establishment hacks isn’t get you to believe 2+2=5. That would make you an idiot. What they want is for you to ACCEPT that 2+2 CAN EQUAL 5.

A week ago on Nov. 2nd, the establishment hack website Politico published a little sneak peak of Donna Brazile’s “ground breaking” new book “Hacks” on their website. It served it’s purpose. The public got all excited about the upcoming publication and the WWE-style “debate” began to rage between the establishment “hacks” who back Clinton and the defenders of Brazile who pretend they are somehow different from their detractors.

It’s a show. Nothing more.

Politico is an establishment rag who would never publish anything of substance that dared address the real problem with the un-Democratic Party today.

For that matter, Brazile’s book is being published by Hachette Book Group, one of the 5 big publishing houses here in the states (French owned but based out of New York city of course):

Why would these massive, establishment-backing entities publish and promote a book that claims to be attacking the Clinton machine which serves their interest so well?

Perhaps because her book doesn’t do that at all. Instead what it may do is help them to remake the tarnished image of the corporatist left, the neoliberal “centrist” left, in time for the 2018 mid-term elections.

Let us be very clear about what happened in 2016. The corporate DNC stole the nomination from Sanders voters and had they not done that, we would be evaluating the first year of his presidency instead of Trump’s. That’s a fact that is unavoidable.

They didn’t merely “tip the scale”… they STOLE the nomination.

Everyone of her dogged supporters right now say Hillary COULDN’T have rigged the election because they are all run by the individual states and not the national DNC ergo… they could not possibly have “rigged” the election.

That is ridiculous. If you don’t think the state and local chairmen of the party would be willing and eager to appease the Clinton machine and the national DNC establishment by doing their bidding and helping them rig the primaries in favor of Killary, you are a moron.

Exit polling proved they were doing just that before they decided to stop allowing exit polling because it was exposing their theft of the primary.

Millions of Sanders voters were PURGED off the DNC registration rolls just prior to the election. They were forced to fill out absentee ballots which were shredded and never counted.

Rules were changed in states where caucuses were held so Hillary would “win” them and when the members reacted angrily to those acts, the DNC and their friends in the establishment media tried to make it look like Sanders supporters were violent thugs attacking poor innocent Debbie Wassserman Schultz.

The 2016 DNC primary was absolutely rigged and it was rigged by the leadership of the DNC in collusion with the heads of various state DNC chapters for one very specific reason… to keep someone with SLIGHTLY progressive opinions OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE.

The corporate DNC understood that Sanders polled much better against Trump than Hillary did. She was the most unpopular candidate they ever fielded. Period. Her corruption was legendary and her history of backing neoliberal economic ideology goes back to her days as a Goldwater Girl.

Hillary Clinton isn’t just a “right of Reagan” republican… she’s a neocon and as such, she was eventually BACKED by the vast majority of the neocons. The same neocons that made up the Bush/Cheney regime.

Killing off the Sanders bid for the White House became the DNC’s primary goal even coming before her “winning” the general election and you know that by how much time they spent alienating his progressive base. Yes, they called the angry Trump supporters “deplorable” but they were even harsher on Bernie bots if you recall.

To the neoliberals in the DNC, it would be better to have a neoliberal Trump in the White House than a SLIGHTLY progressive Sanders and so it made them work very hard and risk a lot to make sure that goal was met. Even if that meant burning down the un-Democratic Party in the process.

Having failed to “undermine the bedrock of our democracy” with his Jill Stein “recount” effort, John Podesta launches a new destabilization campaign to stop the process of the election and install the war-criminal and serial liar, Hillary Clinton, in the White House.

After careful consideration and many hours of research I concluded that Jill Stein’s recount efforts in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan were not about protecting the integrity of our deeply flawed election system as much as they were about delaying the Electoral College voters from being able to certify their election totals before the “safe harbor” deadline of Dec. 13th thus keeping Donald Trump from being officially named the president elect on Dec. 19th when the voters actually get together and officially cast their votes as prescribed by the voters they represent.

In my earliest article on the subject, I wrote about how Stein was working with various DNC operatives on her recount effort and afterward I wrote about how most (if not all) of the Green Party leaders refused to back her efforts because they too thought of it as backing efforts to redo the election and install Hillary Clinton in the White House.

Leading “alternative” left-leaning journalists like the Sane Progressive and Jimmy Dore couldn’t seem to wrap their heads around the concept in spite of the fact that so many real liberals from the Green party, including Stein’s own running mate, condemned her efforts as disingenuous.

Hillary’s flailing poll numbers, her constant reveals relating to her various crimes of the past and her sagging health issues are making it seem quite clear that she may have to be removed from the ticket in order for the Goldman Sachs crowd to be happy about their chances in November. To that end, there’s a lot of talk circulating in the media right now on the fringes about Hillary Clinton being replaced by someone at the top of the ticket.

David Shuster started the whole thing off yesterday afternoon with a simple Tweet:

From there the story has spread and it looks like the selection process will be about as democratic as the primary process was:

“Should Mrs Clinton drop out of the race, the DNC would hold a special meeting to vote for a successor. Party rules indicate that a new nominee would be elected by a simple majority vote.” Express UK

Yes, the establishment DNC who cheated Bernie Sanders voters out of their primary pick will be the only ones allowed to have any say in who replaces Killary at the top of the ticket:

“If Hillary Clinton or any other Democratic nominee had to leave the race, the DNC would need to gavel back into session and re-do the process all over again. The DNC consists of more than 200 members, selected by Democrats in all 50 states as well as the chairs and vice chairs of each state party. Except this time, the average Joe rank-and-file Democrat would be shut out; it is the DNC officials that were railed at throughout this year’s campaign who are afforded the power of finding a replacement. Article III, Section 1, the clause that provides the DNC with that power, is as straightforward as can be: “The Democratic National Committee shall have general responsibility for the affairs of the Democratic Party between National Conventions…This responsibility shall include…filling vacancies in the nominations for the office of President and Vice President.” National Interests blog

“For decades, Democrats who support a strong international presence for the United States have been called “Scoop Jackson Democrats”, the term even being used to describe contemporary Democrats such as Joe Lieberman and R. James Woolsey, Jr. ” Hoover Institute

What were the tasks ahead of the trolls who ran the unDemocratic National Committee this week? How well did they accomplish them if at all?

Well, if the idea John Podesta (of the fake left corporatist think-tank Center for American Progress and Killary’s campaign chair) was looking for was to send the remaining left-leaners in the party (i.e. Sanders supporters) into sporadic epileptic seizures culminating in a catatonic state, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

If his idea was to woo the Scoop Jackson Dems back into the fold with their less-than subtle appeal to modern conservative themes of militarism and protecting the status quo, he’s TWO FOR TWO.

And if his idea was to seduce the Republicans with overt militarism worship and promises of “centrist” (read as “right of Reagan”) foreign and domestic policy agendas, IT’S THE TRIFECTA!

Yes, Hillary Clinton (and her busy little trolls apparently) has gone Full Cheney in her bid to become the first woman president of the United States from the one true party, the Business Party of America.

“I would say all Republican foreign policy professionals are anti-Trump,” leading neoconservative Robert Kagan told a group gathered around him, groupie-style, at a “foreign policy professionals for Hillary” fundraiser I attended last week. “I would say that a majority of people in my circle will vote for Hillary.”

Watching Hillary Clinton (I call her “Scratchy McScreachalot”) give her acceptance speech last night I couldn’t help but think of just how completely crazy this woman has become. Compare her old speeches in the senate when she was parroting the neocon lies about Iraq and Saddam in order to get Dems to vote for a war of aggression to this one. They just aren’t the same people. I don’t know where this thing came from but it probably started to rear it’s troubling head when it cackled “We came, We Saw, He Died! hee hee hee”

Lat night Scratchy McScreachalot’s speech was riddled with numbers of sudden, unexplained emotional disconnections between her facial expressions and the words coming out of her mouth. At one moment she would be talking about something serious with eyes peeled back, wide open and a scowl on her face and then suddenly, POW, like someone grabbed a handful of flesh from the back of her head and pulled her face back, she contorted into this menacing smile like a Chucky doll on meth. Or that character from We Happy Few.

I know what it was. Her campaign manager whispering something in her earpiece trying to soften her up (“Hillary? Smile baby, come on.”).POW! So she does.

Either that or she’s taking her “Joy”

When she starts down the road in a speech about foreign policy or pretty much anything else, Scratchy McScreachalot can go nuclear fast and that doesn’t serve her new branding of Grandma President at all. They need to make her appeal to older women voters who are married with kids because historically (at least recently) they vote republican.

(Pay attention because watching the Scoop Jackson Dems appeal to republican voters (and neocons) is going to be a major theme in the next article.)

Every politician does this. They all have input coming in at real time while they give their speeches which were written by someone else (which is why the criticism of Trump’s wife’s speech was totally ridiculous. They all take credit for someone else’s writing). They’re not just puppets because they are wholly owned subsidiaries of major corporations and financial houses, they are quite literally puppets with someone’s hand stuck up their earpiece mouthing the words and faking the emotional context live on stage.

The problem with Scratchy McScreachalot is that she appears completely incapable of improvising anything that even closely resembles real human connection with the environment that surrounds her.

She doesn’t have any self-editing skills. When she was pleased that she had done the master’s bidding and rid the world of a beloved socialist leader in Africa who had been a thorn in their side, she couldn’t understand she was sitting in front of a live camera as she giggled and hopped in her chair like a 5-year-old you just told you are taking to the zoo.

Last night’s speech was full of misplaced inflections, mechanical cadence delivery and sudden, unexplained outbursts of emotional transitions that just popped up out of the blue with no rhyme or reason.

It’s like something trying to be human, repeating and regurgitating mimicked affections of humanity without really understanding what they mean or where they belong. Do you understand?

Like a developing toddler trying to figure out which facial emojis it can use to illicit various responses from it’s parents, Scratchy McScreachalot seems to be regressing back to that early development stage and when you compare the long history of public speeches this woman delivered over the decades she’s been in public office to this one, you have to wonder what is causing this OBVIOUS deterioration.

Now, I’m not a psychiatrist but something tells me disjointed communication skills like these are a clue to something.