Convicted Terrorist Known as the "20th Hijacker" Has a Stunning Claim About the 9/11 Attacks

This is from the
Daily Mail so take it for what it is. The only other source is
The
Blaze at the moment. Over time I have learned to keep my mouth shut about this topic, but that's never meant that my eyes and ears stopped
looking and listening for relevant information. Some bullet points from the source:

- He said an unnamed prince paid for him and 19 hijackers to learn to fly

- Government lawyers interviewed him and said he had 'relevant' material

- Saudi government has flatly denied all involvement in 9/11

- Experts cast doubt on Moussaoui's credibility, as he is erratic in court

The incredible claims were made in documents filed to a federal court in Oklahoma, in which Moussaoui says a prince 'was assisting me in my
Islamic terrorist activities... and was doing so knowingly for Osama bin Laden'.

He went on to say that bin Laden provided assistance from Saudi leaders in planning the attacks and that he was involved in a plot to shoot down Air
Force One with Bill Clinton on board.

Lawyers for the Federal government have taken him seriously enough to interview him over the claims at the maximum security Colorado prison where
he is serving a life sentence without parole. They say he had 'relevant' material to contribute.

While many of us have been left scratching our heads, the Saudi connection seems like beating a horse that is very much alive and well. Forgive my
ignorance on certain details regarding all the conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11 as there are many more people who have dedicated their lives to
uncovering something that may or may not really be there.

“I am ready to testify about all the above and more in your court in an Open Hearing that I request,” Moussaoui said in a handwritten court
document dated October 23.

What do you think, can he be trusted? Probably not. Should we let him speak? Absolutely, I'm all ears. Just make sure they swear him in with the
Qu'ran.

Thanks for your input. Worst approach to a subject I have ever seen. This does not dismiss the already convicted hijackers, it just adds another layer
of meat to the lasagna. Do you believe the official story? And if you do, can you admit there are things we still don't know?

Let me guess, Hitler won the lotto and never asked for a dime in funding. People with $$$ can afford to change the course of history.

OP I really like your "swear on a Koran " lol imo yea sure SA was involved . They were not the only ones but yea ,sure , why not ? The 911
thing is so big with so much crap to sift through that unless you are retired and go through all of it you will remain unsure . There are two dot's
to connect . One in the beginning and one at the end . SA is a dot in a line that fits so nicely .Until the time comes when they are no longer a pawn
in this grand scheme of things ,they are in there like dirt .

In this article, he actually gives the name of the prince. That mans name is Turki Al Faisal Al Saud.

In his pleading, Moussaoui claims a Saudi prince, Turki Al Faisal Al Saud, met with him in Norman and assisted him in his Islamic terrorist
activities. The prince in the past has condemned the 9/11 attacks, saying he “had devoted all of my working life to combating such
crimes.”

Born February 15, 1945. He currently is a member of the House of Saud and the Saudi Arabia royal
family. He is also one of the founders of the King Faisal Foundation and within the
foundation, the chairman for Research and Islamic Studies.

Even more alluring is the fact that he resigned from Director General of the Saudi intelligence agency on September 1, 2001 only ten days before the
attacks on 9/11.

After Prince Turki quit, he then served as ambassador to the Court of St. James (based
in the UK), and IRONICALLY, the United States.

More from Zacarias Moussaoui about a possible plan to assassinate the Clintons...

He claims he spoke to a Secret Service agent twice this year about the plot by al-Qaida to shoot down Air Force One and to assassinate “Bill
and/or Hillary Clinton.” The four-page pleading gives no time frame for those assertions.

He claims the plot against Air Force One involved a top employee of the Saudi Embassy. He claims the assassination attempt against the Clintons was to
have been in England at Cambridge.

To be honest, this is the only 9/11 conspiracy theory that I kind of subscribe to these days.

I mean, since the 1993 WTC bombing, Al Qaeda was attempting to get nukes or fissile material as a deterrent to keep the West OUT of the region. And
then 9/11 was supposed to draw the West INTO the region? From a geopolitical standpoint, it was not likely to be Al Qaeda, especially since they only,
kinda, eventually claimed responisbility - not the Modus Operandi of an organisation keen on being blamed for the attacks.

originally posted by: eisegesis
Thanks for your input. Worst approach to a subject I have ever seen. This does not dismiss the already convicted hijackers, it just adds another layer
of meat to the lasagna. Do you believe the official story? And if you do, can you admit there are things we still don't know?

Let me guess, Hitler won the lotto and never asked for a dime in funding. People with $$$ can afford to change the course of history.

A few thousand people died, including a few people that I actually knew first hand. The only way the terrorists win is if we keep rehashing this
criminal act and allow our public policy to continue to be motivated by its ghost.

Here OP . you can if you like ,watch this 3 part vid on 911 will give you a good heads up to things that were going on and how sometimes history will
continue to repeat it's self . 911 is only a proxy to advance the plan to go forward

flying the planes is irrelevant you could have flown 20 planes into the towers and they wouldn´t move a ft lt alone collapse into pieces no bigger
than a womans handbag after burning for a while . it´s total bollocks

I believe everyone in the thread has been very civil thus far. Unless, by civil, you mean blindly agreeing with your opinions on 9/11. How about
instead of making me the target of your frustrations, you make a point to talk about what I said.

How about instead of making me the target of your frustrations, you make a point to talk about what I said.

I am not frustrated. Not even in the slightest. Earlier you said...

I don't -care- about the official story.

I don't -care- about 9/11.

Talk about what you said eh? That my friend, would be called a waste of my time. You have not yet once commented on the material in the original post.
If you feel like unwinding and let people think for themselves, ring my doorbell.

S&F OP, not something I can often say on this forum but, this has the potential to be the biggest development in the 9/11 saga in years and you
brought it to our attention.

I am a avid 9/11 researcher and anyone who has read my threads on the subject will know that I typically side with the official narrative. However one
thing I have always been suspicious of is the role of the Saudi's and some members of the Royal family who may have been covertly funding Al-Qa'ida.
Officially the Saudi's totally cut of Bin Laden in the mid 1990's they revoked his passport primarily because he denounced the house of Saud for
allowing the American's in to Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden was highly critical of the Saudi Royal family despite his family having strong links with the
House of Saud and for that reason he was disowned by his own country and forced to flee to Sudan.

With a royal family so big and one that argues so much I have always thought that it was something of a inevitability that a wealthy Saudi prince may
have been funding Al-Qa'ida. A prince who is critical of the royal family and sympathetic the the goals of Al-Qa'ida sending a few thousand dollars
over them every now and then is not a huge stretch of the imagination.

Furthermore I also believe that Western intelligence must know this and probably have more specific details but they have covered it up. The reason
for this should be obvious, Saudi Arabia is the West's biggest Islamic ally and provides lots of black gold, up setting them by accusing a close
family member of the King of being involved in 9/11 would cause huge political ripples.

So they covered it up (the missing 28 pages)

That means that there are culprits at large who where responsible for 9/11, at least in part, who the American government is continuing to allow to
life a live of luxuriantly because it would be politically "difficult" hold accountable for their crimes.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.