"In A Time Of Universal Deceit, Telling The Truth Becomes A Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell, Author
.....
"All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First, It Is Ridiculed, Second It Is Violently Opposed, And Third, It Is
Accepted As Self-Evident" – Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Project Apollo... What Were They Thinking? Part I

Sometimes it takes courage to come forward and give an honest opinion about some of the so called historical records that have been presented to us as true.... Such as Project Apollo....

I hold no punches when it comes to Project Apollo, and what other lies that NASA has perpetrated on the world.... I am in an ever growing group of people who have taken the time (30 years! in my case), to fully comprehend what was done, the scope of the lies, and why they did it!

First of all, as I have stated before, Apollo was a sham, and a lie! There can be only one truth when one takes the time to go over all of the videos, the photos, the science, and the technology, to realize that going to the moon between 1968-1972 was an astonishing... but a very impossible task!As Ralph Rene, and Bill Kaysing first speculated, and then came out with positive proof in their writings and research, putting men on the moon with the technology available in that period of history was an impossible task, and to save the US government and NASA the shame of having to come forward and tell the people that they could not do it, they instead decided to LIE and DECEIVE the people into a false sense of pride by going forward with a covert project spearheaded by both NASA, and the CIA called the "Apollo Simulation Project".

It does not take any rocket scientist today to look back at that time period and see how antiquated the technology was compared to today. The Russians and the Americans had only put men into orbit since 1961, and the highest altitude that was ever done in a manned space flight until 1966 was approximately 300 miles. I am not sold on the US claims about several Gemini flights going up to 1000 miles, because much of the information on those flights is open to speculation, and the possibility of distorted claims by NASA. It is astounding to think that suddenly in 1968, and without first testing the space between the Earth and the Moon to verify that humans could survive the journey, we were suddenly orbiting the Moon at 241,000 miles! A jump of at least 24100% over the Gemini flights in less than two years! Very astounding indeed!

One must first take a close look at the Apollo One mishap in 1967 to realize the extent that NASA and the CIA were going to go to keep the lies going. On that fateful day in January 1967, Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee were strapped into the Apollo One capsule on the launchpad at Cape Kennedy for a test of the Apollo One systems.... Gus Grissom was a very proud man, and was astounded by what he was seeing in the Apollo program. He was probably the first to realize the impossibility of having the Apollo craft make orbit, rather than be able to fly to the moon and back! Being a critic of Apollo, he even hung a lemon on the window of the Command Module during the tests, and told Mission control several times his honest opinion of what he thought of the whole Apollo scam. It was during a test that a spark caused a fire in the Command Module with the three astronauts strapped in securely. Being in a PURE oxygen environment, these three had only seconds to escape or be burned alive. However, due to negligence, the Command Module did not have even a LATCH on the INSIDE of the module for the men to quickly escape! How silly and negligent was that? These three men perished as a result, burned alive! The sad part is that NASA has to this day not conducted a full proper investigation of the Apollo One incident, and the Command Module has still been locked away under tight security! One only needs to look at 9-11 in comparison, and how quickly the criminals disposed of the evidence then by having the steel beams from the WTC quickly sold off and shipped to China to see how dastardly this really is! To this day, even the families of these three brave men have not been allowed closure.

After Apollo One, NASA supposedly made changes to the capsule (like a door that actually opens from the inside?) and cancelled Apollo flights 2-6... Apollo Seven was supposedly launched into Low Earth Orbit finally with men aboard to test its launch capability. But Apollo Eight did even better, by putting three astroNOTs (yes, I also say these men never went) into orbit around the moon in late 1968! Very astounding indeed that they all TRUSTED that the systems would not fail, and that the craft would survive trans-Lunar space all the way to the moon! Apollo One should have caused greater concern indeed! How could these three men agree to go to such a hostile environment without any proper tests conducted first?

Yes, space outside of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) is very hostile indeed! Dr. James Van Allen basically put an end to men going to the moon with the technology at hand in the 60's, back in 1958-59 with his discovery and testing of the Van Allen Radiation Belts. People to this day do not fully understand outer space, and sometimes I blame NASA itself for keeping them in the dark to the truth! Ordinary people look up into the sky at night, and observe the planets, and the Moon itself, and think about how great it is that NASA put men there, and that someday we will all venture into space. Well, good luck to that! The VA belts are a set of belts beginning at an altitude of 500 miles, and extending outwards to about 10000 miles. They are basically a result of the Earth's magnetic spinning core, and a zone where charged particles from the Sun, and interstellar space are caught in the magnetic field lines of our planet, and trapped into "belts", preventing them from hitting the Earth's surface itself. Without the belts, life on this planet would have been impossible, due to the high levels of radiation that would be bombarding our surface relentlessly! The side effect is that any higher than LEO space flights would require a method of having the Astronauts surviving the intense radiation within the belts as they transverse them into interstellar space.

In 1983, a Dr Frank Greening from the Ontario Nuclear Regulatory Commission, got a hold of some valuable data on the strength of the VA belts from a fellow doctor, and nuclear radiation expert, in the then USSR named EE Kovalev. EE Kovalev got his data from Russian space flights, and tests conducted on the strength of the VA belts. The information was astounding! Ralph Rene puts it in his books as straight forward as possible.... The belts do vary in intensity, but the maximum intensity within the belts is approximately 280,000 rads/day, or 11600 rads/hour! One rad approximates to one rem in intensity, and the maximum intensity that any human can sustain without dying is about 200 rem/hour over one hour maximum, AND over one's entire lifetime! Even if one assumes that the average intensity is about 1/2 of the maximum, we are talking 5800 rem/hour, or 29 TIMES the level needed to kill an average man! Project Apollo called for the transverse of the belts over a period of one hour minimum going in each direction, towards the moon, and upon its return. In doing so, with only ALUMINUM for shielding, which is no shielding at all, these Astro-NOTs should have been dead!

NASA has always conveniently said that Dr. Van Allen's original research, and the research of others is false, due to their fantastic assertion, and analogy that Apollo astro-NOTs went to the moon, and back, are still alive today, and proof therefore that the belts are not as deadly as claimed! This is a very strange of reverse logic indeed. Even Alan Bean from Apollo 12 in a video discussion with Bart Sibrel said back in 1998 that he didnt even know if the VA belts had been discovered yet by the time of his flight (?).

Radiation of the belts is one thing, but the space between the VA belts and the Moon itself is also under constant bombardment by both Solar Flares, Mass Solar Ejections, and Cosmic Rays. Remember, there is no VA belt there, or an atmosphere, to protect these men. It is also a fact that the Lunar surface, with no atmosphere, has been under constant bombardment by these same deadly particles for billions of years. It is little known to the comman person that the Lunar surface itself is highly radioactive, and lethal to humans, itself!

Apollo had to be as light as possible to get into orbit, and then off to the moon. In doing so, the hull of the spacecraft was made of very thin aluminum. As I, and others, have stated many times, thin aluminum is no shielding at all. In fact, Aluminum has been discovered that when bombarded by high speed radioactive particles, it tends to give off a shower of very deadly secondary particles!Therefore, one must ask.... How did they keep these men alive for the trips to the Moon?

This is only one part of a very long expose of Apollo.... I have only began to scratch the surface, and I do ask for readers to go over and watch a very good video series called Moonfaker for additional information on the Apollo farce!

I have found that many people are still blinded by the pride of Apollo to use reasoning. People have to realize that Project Apollo was a propaganda stunt, and a sham. It has distorted science, especially in astronomy for the last 40 years, thanks to some very dastardly organizations including NASA itself!

There is so much to cover here, and I will do my part in keeping the hope that the truth will come to full exposure soon. Government organizations can only lie for so long before they are eventually caught cheating!

5 comments:

There are a few inaccuracies that don't change the conclusion but could be used as debunker food.

- The CM walls were not made just of aluminum, but of aluminum, steel and insulating fibers. However good luck finding the actual thicknesses... no wonder that information is not available, since it would allow a precise dose computation. (Note: knowing that the walls are X inches thick is not enough, since they are honeycomb structures).

- Saying that aluminum is no shielding at all is inaccurate and will be used as debunker food. First, any material will perform some shielding. In sufficient thickness (on the order of centimeters) aluminum can give substantial shielding. However, there is a lack of data, and nothing indicates that the required thickness was present on the CM.

- It is true that secondary radiation from electrons hitting the craft produces X-rays. How much, we don't know, but it could be a shieldable amount. Again, data is lacking.

- Secondary particles from proton irradiation are much more annoying. You get neutrons at various energies, and you really don't want to get bombarded with neutrons, as their biological effectiveness is 10 x higher than common forms of radiation (electrons and photons); shielding from neutrons requires lead or boron.

- Wording : It's the Earth's magnetic field that protects us from radiation, not the belts. The belts are a consequence of the field.

I do not go into great detail about the aluminum walls being paper thin, with internal padding, and a some amount of insulation... But the point has been that the craft had to be as light as possible to attain orbit to start with. Several astro-NOTs have been quoted many times about the paper thin walls of the craft.

Aluminum offers very little protection from radiation, and does create a shower of secondary particles. The 10 GeV cosmic ray particles in particular would go right through that paper thin hull in an instant. The belts would have given them deadly doses with only aluminum.

The belts are a side effect of the magnetic field of the planet, true... My conjecture is that they are a side effect of the magnetic lines of the earth, and are a deep pool of charged particles thousands of miles deep.

Great post. I don't understand why hoax articles feel the need to attach the 9/11 story to their reasoning. Regardless of how one feels about that issue, the debunkers always cloud the issue and say 'those conspiracists don't belive in anything'. I'm of the opinion, that if the moon hoax can be revealed to more people the other dominoes will fall. The evidence that is out there is so conclusive that you should concentrate on the non-sensational information as the stories of intentionally killing Grissom and crew are too much of a leap for soime people that are newly introduced to the subject. I firmly think if people look at the core evidence it will at least create doubt and help them disassociate from the pro-government mindset we all had embedded in us since we were kids. At that point, they will take the journey themselves and more readily accept these other claims which to me are absolutely plausible -to a beginner it will probably scare them away...

For the last three months, I was going again and again over your posts Apollo Hoax. Really you have a wonderful blog.

I am not sure if this can prove anything. I went over the timeline for Apollo 11 (http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4029/Apollo_11i_Timeline.htm) and I noticed only 32 minutes between the Hatch Open time and when the astronauts entered the mobile quarantine facility. Through the available videos and pictures and as stated on Wikipedia the Astronauts walked 9.1 meters to the Mobile Quarantine Facility. Is this possible after 32 minutes? Why no one helped them when they walk out from the helicopter after their long trip to the moon, was it 8 days on zero gravity and they easy recover from it within 30 minutes!thanks again.

About Myself

Fair Use Notice

Fair Use Notice

§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.