Wow. I have a completely different way of doing things. In my little world, people can say whatever they want. But if I'm gay, and a group sets out to persecute me, I'll probably kill one of them and hang their body in public for his friends to see.

violence is worse than inciting it.

people can say what they want, but when you start making threats and tell people to torture others, you have crossed the line.

Wow. I have a completely different way of doing things. In my little world, people can say whatever they want. But if I'm gay, and a group sets out to persecute me, I'll probably kill one of them and hang their body in public for his friends to see.

violence is worse than inciting it.

So then leave me alone, and there won't be a problem. Fundamentally, I think we should each be able to do whatever we want so long as it does not directly affect the lives of others. Running your mouth doesn't affect me. Inciting violence doesn't affect me. Being violent towards me does effect me, and it's likely to effect you even more.

I would count kill X as not leaving you alone. but I am willing to be american about it. only a direct incitement of violence should be disallowed.

A direct incitement of criminal violence should be a criminal offense similar to conspiracy to commit said violence, and in my opinion, should be punished according to its likelihood to result in said violence.

Slander and libel are also against the law, but are civil offenses. Other than these, people should be free to express their opinions (and to suffer the social and commercial consequences thereof).

Punishing according to the likelihood to result in said violence gets interesting in the case of broadcast media. If saying out loud, "We need somebody to kill that motherfucker!", has roughly a 0.000001 probability (a 0.0001% chance) of causing any given individual who hears it to actually do it, and a million people hear it, then the person who said it should get a sentence similar to that of conspiracy to commit murder.

So if this bitch telling people to beat up queers was talking to, say, 10,000 listeners, the station should not only be getting a heavy fine and moving a step toward suspension of its license, she as an individual should probably be making a donation of $10,000 to some organization that prevents violence against queers, in lieu of spending a month in the slammer._________________

patrix_neo wrote:

The human thought: I cannot win.
The ratbrain in me : I can only go forward and that's it.

Spineless fucking weasels. He's already explained that Islam was his motivation, but CNN is so busy trying to PC obfuscate the truth, that they end up blaming the US, instead of that fucktard's 7th century child-raping cult._________________People Of Love

UN Human Rights Council “expert” Richard Falk has published a statement saying Bostonians got what they deserved in last week’s terror attack. He quotes W.H. Auden to make his point: "to whom evil is done/do evil in return.”

Richard Falk is the UN’s “Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967.” He has held the post since 2008, despite exposure as a 9/11 conspiracy theorist.

In his latest rant, published online on April 21, 2013 by foreignpolicyjournal.com Falk repeats the libel that prior to 9/11 President George W. Bush was seeking a “pretext” for war, and that anything Israel is the opposite of “justice and peace.”

And then he attacks Bostonians head-on. The police action in Boston was a "hysterical dragnet." Boston’s dead were "canaries" that "have to die" because of America’s “fantasy of global domination."

_________________"Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated, until defeat has been accepted as a reality." -- Bruce Lee

The surviving suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings has cited the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as motivating factors behind last week's attack, a U.S. government official said Tuesday.

they could be lying.

you couldn't possibly be thinking they are pulling a MiniLove on the general populous now?

juniper wrote:

from your first article

Wall Street Journal wrote:

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev told investigators that the brothers were self-trained and self-indoctrinated, and were striking back at the U.S. for killing Muslims.

as to your second article, I don't believe it is a religion of peace.

That is the irony of the RoP tag. It doesn't matter if there were religious motivations or Shits&Giggles motivation, once a Muslim kills the whole RoP doctrine that is proclaimed is proven to be a complete lie, lie span to non-Muslims.

Christianity and Islam justify killing in a few circumstances, islam is a bit more liberal on the subject tho. NONE call for wonton murder of innocence, WELL actually islam does but only for non-believers (where believers are: Jews, Christians and Muslims)

But that is just words in old books... what is actually preached is something different. Man is always the weaklink in anything_________________The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter
Great Britain is a republic, with a hereditary president, while the United States is a monarchy with an elective king

UN Human Rights Council “expert” Richard Falk has published a statement saying Bostonians got what they deserved in last week’s terror attack. He quotes W.H. Auden to make his point: "to whom evil is done/do evil in return.”

Richard Falk is the UN’s “Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967.” He has held the post since 2008, despite exposure as a 9/11 conspiracy theorist.

In his latest rant, published online on April 21, 2013 by foreignpolicyjournal.com Falk repeats the libel that prior to 9/11 President George W. Bush was seeking a “pretext” for war, and that anything Israel is the opposite of “justice and peace.”

And then he attacks Bostonians head-on. The police action in Boston was a "hysterical dragnet." Boston’s dead were "canaries" that "have to die" because of America’s “fantasy of global domination."

Read more at Breitbart.com Sometimes you are an unwitting genius._________________"History began on July 4,1776. Everything before that was a mistake." -Ron Swanson

According to the Detroit Free Press, Christian missionaries have attended the festival in the past. But the paper said things turned ugly last year when members of the Bible Believers mounted a pig’s head on a pole and brought signs that denigrated Islam.

Last edited by Fran on Tue Jun 25, 2013 10:55 am; edited 1 time in total

There is no demarcation in the video between the dumb and the stupid. If they fenced in the entire square with both sets of morons present they could double the remaining neighbourhood IQ in an instant.