Katie Holmes-Tom Cruise split focuses on custody, Scientology

Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise watch the Minnesota Timberwolves play the Los Angeles Lakers in an NBA basketball game, in Los Angeles, in 2010.

Kathy Willens | ASSOCIATED PRESS

Actress Katie Holmes joins her husband Tom Cruise in 2007 as he holds their daughter Suri after Holmes finished the New York City Marathon.

By Richard Winton, Los Angeles Times

Posted July 03, 2012, at 5:40 a.m.

LOS ANGELES — The impending divorce case between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise is likely to center on the terms of custody for their daughter Suri, according to a source familiar with the case.

Holmes filed court papers in New York. Neither she nor her attorneys have commented on the reasons for the split. Cruise was shooting a film in Iceland when the papers were filed.

The source, who talked to the Los Angeles Times on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak, said Scientology and what role it would play in Suri’s upbringing was a key factor in the split. Cruise is a prominent member of Scientology.

The source said the negotiations will probably center on a custody arrangement that would give both parents rights while also regulating the kind of Scientology teaching Suri, 6, is exposed to.

Story continues below advertisement.

“How do you … ensure a normal relationship with her father” while putting limits on her exposure to Scientology, the source said.

Holmes, 33, has retained two prominent law firms that specialize in wealthy breakups. New York lawyer Allan E. Mayefsky has been involved in a number of acrimonious and headline-grabbing splits, including the divorces of model Christie Brinkley, TV anchor Joan Lunden and a Manhattan financier who was ordered to pay his ex-wife $44 million.

In addition, the “Dawson’s Creek” actress hired a New Jersey divorce lawyer, Jonathan Wolfe, whose website boasts of his prowess in “complex matrimonial matters” involving “leaders or the spouses of leaders” in business, entertainment and sports. He has written extensively about prenuptial agreements and ways to recover hidden assets in divorce proceedings.

In a statement, Wolfe called the divorce “a personal and private matter.”

“Katie’s primary concern remains, as it has always been, her daughter’s best interest,” the lawyer said.

Speculation about a prenuptial agreement began almost immediately after the couple’s engagement. Cruise already had two ex-wives in Hollywood — actresses Mimi Rogers and Nicole Kidman. He adopted two children with Kidman. His annual earnings — recently estimated by Forbes at $75 million — dwarf those of Holmes, whose father is a lawyer.

Bernard Clair, a Manhattan divorce lawyer with many wealthy clients, said judges generally order divorcing couples to abide by the terms of their prenuptial agreements when it comes to finances. But the court often modifies provisions governing child support and custody, potential issues in the Cruise-Holmes breakup.

“These provisions relating to custody are almost always viewed as statements of intent and aspiration as opposed to enforceable and binding provisions,” Clair said.

Fields said he’s hopeful the divorce proceedings initiated by the movie star’s wife can occur without rancor.

“I would hope that it’s not a contentious matter. I know Tom is not a particularly contentious person,” Fields said.

Celebrities who have filed for divorce in California have been subject to media scrutiny because of public records law. Court documents recently detailed the property and assets changing hands during Kobe Bryant’s divorce proceedings.

Before that, court papers revealed details about former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s divorce from Maria Shriver, including that Schwarzenegger did not want to pay spousal support to his wife of 25 years.