NSA/GCHQ Use Lolcats To Discuss What They Learn By Spying On All Of Our YouTube Views And Facebook Likes

from the squeaky-dolphins-and-lolcats dept

Just hours after the NY Times/the Guardian and Pro Publica released their stories about Snowden documents revealing the NSA and GCHQ spying on mobile apps, NBC News, working with Glenn Greenwald, revealed a different bunch of Snowden documents concerning how the NSA and GCHQ are collecting unencrypted data concerning YouTube views, Facebook likes and Twitter messages via the taps they have on various internet backbone cables. These are not from the companies themselves, but rather because the data travels unencrypted across the internet, which the NSA and GCHQ grab because they can:

The NBC News report includes some sort of bizarre presentation (mostly images, without the associated text) concerning using this information to understand the psychology of folks on the internet. They even use Lolcats. Yes, in one of the strangest sights you may see, here's a "top secret" lolcat image used by the NSA.

According to the report, GCHQ insists that when it's scooping up this kind of data, it's just using it in the aggregate to look up interesting data, connections and trends, rather than spying on anyone individually, but of course, once they have that data, if someone becomes "of interest", it's not difficult to go back and dig through it.

The reporters reached out to multiple tech companies, who note that they had nothing to do with this. That's true, as it seems clear that the information was gleaned from the taps placed on the backbone, with the help of the giant telcos, rather than the internet companies. However, at this point, it seems time for any company to recognize that if any bit of data is not being encrypted, the NSA/GCHQ is looking through it. Google, once again, seems particularly upset to discover this was going on, after it had pushed back on attempts by the UK to set up data retention rules for this kind of purpose -- when it's clear that GCHQ was already doing it anyway.

A source close to Google added that Google was “shocked” because the company had pushed back against British legislation that would have required Google to store its metadata and other information for U.K. government use. The legislation, introduced by Home Secretary Theresa May in 2012, was publicly repudiated by Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg in 2013 and has never become law. May hopes to reintroduce a modified version this spring.

“It’s extremely surprising,” said the source, “that while they were pushing for the data via the law, they might have simultaneously been using their capability to grab it anyway.”

While it may have been reasonable in the past to assume that if the government wasn't asking for this information via the front door, the info was safe, given both of the big stories of the day, it seems that every online company needs to get much more serious about encryption.

Squeaky Dolphin

That Squeaky Dolphin slide highlights how absurd the scope of the NSA's illegal and immoral surveillance really is. If you scoop up all the Youtube and Facebook "likes" in the universe, that data is only useful if you feed *which* likes matter into the algorithm. But if you know *which* likes matter, you didn't need to scoop up all the data in the first place since you could just go straight to those and build a case for a warrant or find probable cause to go any further. Old-fashioned, tailored investigations end up being the right thing all along, without having to violate the Constitutional and moral rights of everyone in the U.S.

Re: "Anyone else notice OOTB is missing out today on really good material?"

Glad to be mentioned and missed, but there's no good material, just lame political blather.

Besides, having stoked fanboys to point where my screen name is featured front page on the weekend, and they're daily compelled to mention my absence, er, out of the blue, I'm pleased to sit and watch them flounder without me...Techdirt: a sore for site eyes. (90 of 192)

Oh, you're not missed, my old son - far from it. Don't you kid your paranoid and egotistic self. As far as I'm concerned, you can stay AWOL for ever and a day. If you don't know (and nothing would surprise me, judging by the pig-ignorance shown in your posts) what AWOL means, it can be looked up quite easily, courtesy of your old buddies at Google.

Re:

How long before this data is mined to guide politicians as to what they can get away with? How long before its used to guide political campaigns? How long before it is used to nip protest in the bud? About the only use for bulk data is in political manipulation of a population, either by the spies, or their political masters.

Re: paranoid much

Why u talk in the future tense.

If it's currently a possibility, why not insist it's contemporaneously probable.

The only thing "new" about these valuable secrets is that they are leaked to you and me. If there's a secret conspiracy then the conspirators "know & use" the secret NSA rules & even more deeply buried harvested-data at *any* point in time you care to imagine. Makes for a good story. Now how can we decide which day was the 1st example of your "population manipulation by telco-spying" thesis? Where must we look to find the 1st smoking gun? And who you gonna call, ghostbusters??

These are not from the companies themselves, but rather because the data travels unencrypted across the internet, which the NSA and GCHQ grab because they can

That is a stunningly disingenuous, or naive, comment, as the NSA™ and those who own Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Apple, PayPal, eBay, Facebook, Twitter, et al, are of the exact same fiend ilk and aid and abet one another, even if they don’t trust one another.

Who knew Facebook likes were an aspect of terrorism? So when are all these likes going to get together and build some sort of bomb or plan some sort of dastardly deed?

Talk about security minded apps. Just look, Lolscats must be highly rated for security. Geeze the things you learn at Techdirt. And here all those folks were concerned with encryption breaking. Why they can all just head over to Lolscats and have the ultimate of security. /s

Mike is the founder and CEO of Floor64, building up the core idea into reality and recruiting the management team. In addition to providing the strategic direction for the company, Mike oversees all editorial aspects of the Floor64's public and customer sites. Mike's insight into the realms of business, technology economics and public policy are the basis for his frequent posts to the award-winning Techdirt blog. The widely followed, often quoted blog was launched in 1997. Prior to founding Floor64, Mike worked in business development and marketing at Release Software, an e-commerce startup, and in marketing at Intel. Mike has a bachelor's degree in Industrial and Labor Relations and an MBA -- both from Cornell University.

Over the past decade, Floor64 has developed a series of insight platforms that inspire, inform and help companies innovate. In the process, we’ve gathered a world-class team of analysts and technologists and have worked with companies spanning Fortune 500 leaders to newly formed startups from a wide variety of industries.

Currently we maintain and manage two insight platforms - the award-winning technology and business analysis blog, Techdirt, and the exciting new marketplace for connecting companies with a diverse community of expertise, the Insight Community [2]

[2] [Thee[!]] Insight Community:

The Insight Community is a powerful new marketplace, developed by Floor64 as the fastest, most cost effective way to use conversational marketing to supercharge your corporate advertising, blogging, strategy and intelligence efforts

(Bolding mine. ...Rod Serling stirs at the stunning greed, manipulation, and hypocrisy which succeeded his Twilight Zone series. Of course, the most effective way to refute commentary such as the above, has been to flaunt the comment (though not comment on it) as the default response, as if it were not true.)

Re:

Are... are you trying to link Masnick with the NSA? I'm afraid you'll need to be much more succinct in your accusation and how what you've posted provides proof of it. Simply being a corporation does not automatically prove any link.

Oh yeah, I'm sooo surprised.

It’s extremely surprising,” said the source, “that while they were pushing for the data via the law, they might have simultaneously been using their capability to grab it anyway.

Does anyone else out there think that it is even the slightest bit surprising that they may have been grabbing the data any way they could get it? Come now, this has been going on for what, say, a century maybe? Not until someone actually calls them up on it would they likely even be concerned, most likely..