I had things in mind during the first Olypmics... now I forget most of them. I think a limit of games per coordinator would be good, perhaps 2, or 3 at the most. There were just too many games to play, really.

Yes, fewer games. It's hard to have good competition when there's that many games in such a short time... but then again you don't have to play them all. And still, it felt like the criteria on which games were picked were too loose... coordinators picking games they're good at (come on, who's going to touch Slawek on ZooKeeper), and all these different versions of MAME required... it just seemed chaotic.

Haha Barry, you changed your sig already? That's what I get for mentioning there was a wolf in Contra Hard Corps. I still have no good ideas, so I may as well throw in the masturbating coach from High Impact Football. GO COACH GO

I agree with BBH on the coordinator thing. Everybody could choose to be coordinator on a lot of games he's good at and that way win a lot of medals and maybe even the overall individuals. An easy way to avoid this would be to disallow coordinators to play their own games. What it still wouldn't catch is two buddies, each coordinating the other one's favourite games, though...

Limit on the number of games coordinated. Let's try 3 unless there's a shortage. There's ten segments of games, and I'd like to have at least 30 games (3 / segment). If there's more, then we should start limiting. I guess we should have an absolute maximum of four.

As for me, I was going to voluntarily pick games that weren't of my taking for Oly 2 anyway... but I could easily say that you can't be in first place on MARP to coordinate a game. If not... well... let's take BenJos's comment:

What it still wouldn't catch is two buddies, each coordinating the other one's favourite games, though...

We can always bring in a "selection committee" to take care of that problem... just as long as it's better than the NCAA version, right?