‘You realize, of course, that when an Isotope kills millions of people per Gram, it is at its most effective as a ‘mass murder weapon’ when “finely divided” like in a typhoon or other chaotic Earth event.

It is really nasty stuff. ‘

“Evidence of a recent decline in sperm count in a United States population from 2002-2010”

“…..indicated a worsening of the “quality” and the number of sperm in male populations, belonging to some rich areas of our planet…”

~

The total decline is 3.2% per year, not 2%. That is 22.3% in 10 years. That is unheard of. As in VERY BAD.

This time it is the Americans plunging toward Sterility.

Pre-Fukushima stats. Yikes!

‘HEARD FIRST IN that popular town, BOSTON, Shhhhhhhhh, they wanted it kept quiet!!!’

Scientific Program Supplement: Oral and Poster Session Abstracts, International Federation of Fertility Societies 21st World Congress on Fertility and Sterility and the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, October 12-17, 2013, Boston, Massachusetts
Boston, Massachusetts
12–17 October 2013

“Evidence of a recent decline in sperm count in a United States population from 2002-2010“

3 thoughts on “SPERM COUNTS DECLINING STILL; All Nuclear Reactors Leak All The Time …. 1,946 known lethal isotopes…..”

“‘You realize, of course, that when an Isotope kills millions of people per Gram, it is at its most effective as a ‘mass murder weapon’ when “finely divided” like in a typhoon or other chaotic Earth event.”

“It is really nasty stuff. ‘

PS A quick google search of US SPERM COUNTS DECLINING in over a million results seems to make no mention of anything related to the Pro-Nuker comments on blame shifting to smart phones and the kool aid, etc.

START WITH THE SCIENCE then do your best to DODGE THE RADS

Remember remember: WE ARE THE MEDIA NOW and for that WE ARE RESPONSIBLE

First off, I’m not seeing any evidence that says lower sperm counts are due to any type of neuclear reactor, or any other type of radiation. More people are exposed to MRI machines, X-Ray machines and radon, then they are alpha, beta, and gamma radiation from a reactor. All of which have a relatively short “life span” where they can react with anything else.

There’s more evidence of estrogen in water supplies, artificial preservatives, not to mention just about everyone in the country has a smart phone. Most people keep them in their pockets, and that’s a beacon for signals right next to the scrotum.

Does lower sperm counts mean less reproduction? No, I have a low sperm count due to injuries and my wife and I were able to conceive our very first try. Scientifically it means there’s a lesser chance of fertilization, but that’s just numbers. Yes, there’s a higher chance of fertilization when there’s a million sperm going twords an egg than say half that at 500k. Technically, numbers only, there would be twice the chance of fertilization. But that isn’t why population is going down.

Today more and more people are having children later and later in their lives. In my opinion this is a good thing. We’re leaving behind the baby boomer generation and allowing for a more stable economy. As they retire there’s more jobs available, and the next generation will be able to work one job instead of 3. Who works 2-3 jobs in this day and age, just to get by, and wants to bring children into the world? It just makes sense.

Maybe I am pro nuclear energy, But really I dont care either way. All I see here is propaganda. Arrivals based on opinion with a little glimmer of truth to scare people into thinking somethings way worse than it is. I’m sure there’s articals about GMOs in animals, pesticides used to grow our plants, and even marijuana all attributing to the same thing, not to mention all the other affects.

In my opinion the world, not only the USA could use a few less people, if we want the planet to survive, let alone us as a species. I see plenty of arrivals on how to fix the world but no one takes the actions needed to change it. Want to get rid of nuclear energy and power plants? Then find an alternate power source as clean and effective as their radioactive isotopes. To not lose the millions of jobs also find a way to convert the plants now to that power source.

The facts of the matter is that as much alternative energy they’re using all across the country, and the world, is a fraction of the energy needed to produce the demands of today’s populas.

I’m not an expert, but I’m informed and educated enough to draw my own conclusions. It’s this type of propaganda and misinformation that is causing destructive decisions nationwide, because people following the links and their links all day the same exact thing, with little to no proof, and no other side of the argument. They don’t do their own research or know how radioactive isotopes interact, or the hundreds of other factors that could all be the cause of what you’re trying to blame on one thing. One thing you yourself are afraid of because you don’t understand it.

‘We are the media.’ I’m sure that’s what the Nazi’s said in their videos too. We just had a little more proof of what they were up too, so we did something about it.

I know this may get flagged or deleted, but I feel people should think for themselves, and normally I wouldn’t even say anything, but the way this was presented was just atrocious.

Oakridge reports 1,946 known lethal isotopes and everybody knows that all reactors leak all of the time.

To mitigate interruption to the “random killings” it seems that EPA is simply corrupting data to keep the unsuspecting public ignorant of the immediate dangers.

Wishful thinking is certainly a strategy.

Relying on “corporate media” for facts and real information is simply another example of wishful thinking.

Contempt prior to investigation is certainly no survival strategy.

Read some of the other links in the blog for more info, unless you are one of those who think, for example, that the nuclear meltdowns of Fukushima or the ongoing Outrageous radiation releases across America are less dangerous than eating a banana.