Please post any positive or negative feedback for the administrator here.This is not the place to discuss ban appeals, admin complaints, or ban requests.This is for specific feedback for this administrator.

This is for admins in the context of in-game or FNR administrating, as in handling ban cases, not moderating FNR which is elyina's second job. He was enforcing rules that HBL put in place whether you like it or not, your hate is extremely misguided.

Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.

paprika wrote:This is for admins in the context of in-game or FNR administrating, as in handling ban cases, not moderating FNR which is elyina's second job. He was enforcing rules that HBL put in place whether you like it or not, your hate is extremely misguided.

I don't usually care when admins are rude, but Elyina enjoys going above and beyond for whatever reason. Extremely round constantly, never seen him act nice. I and another person were talking using words like "RP" and such, and only I was banned, after I stated that I did not enjoy the RP. The other person involved was left alone. Again, I really don't care about how admins act, but honestly, Elyina needs to calm down a bit, and if they don't like me, not answer my ahelps, and let someone else do it instead.

the retraction was posted in the thread, removing feedback has rarely been done before, I don't see why you need to supress the original complaint, which was ironically about them having feedback moved out of their thread.

oranges wrote:the retraction was posted in the thread, removing feedback has rarely been done before, I don't see why you need to supress the original complaint, which was ironically about them having feedback moved out of their thread.

You can admire the parallels

I agree, it's rarely been done and this was why a minimum of 2 headmins opinions were sought before taking the action.

This isn't the first or last time feedback has been deleted though

Different circumstances, admittedly, but you get my point.

Regardless, this isn't the place for this discussion. I'd invite you to make a thread either in Policy Discussion or Administrator General, whichever you deem more fitting.

This is for admins in the context of in-game or FNR administrating, as in handling ban cases, not moderating FNR which is elyina's second job. He was enforcing rules that HBL put in place whether you like it or not, your hate is extremely misguided.

Stickymayhem wrote:you're right!

Edward Sloan, THE LAWMelanie Flowers, CatgirlBorgasm, Cyborg

Spoiler:

OOC: Hunterh98: to be fair sloan is one of the, if not the, most robust folks on tg

DEAD: Schlomo Gaskin says, "sloan may be a faggot but he gets the job done"

4 year old hate from a poorly enforced era of administration would understandably be irrelevant today.

It does immediately provide a negative image rather unfairly.

Instead, why not focus on the positives of elyina's administrative ability and add posts that counteract the negative feedback from four years ago, which I might point out, was retracted literally 2 posts later after someone explained the situation.

For example: Elyina definitely takes the time to ask in adminbus about rulings, when they're unsure, which is a good trait to have.

Doing things like that would have improved the quality of the thread, Removing feedback takes the thread right back to the same place as 4 years ago and was pretty shortsighted as now people have a legitimate complaint about elyina getting feedback that reflects poorly on them removed.

if you think the removal of feedback from 4 years ago that was in the wrong section to begin with is trying to cover something up you're either beyond help or just posting in bad faith which i will not even engage with. 37 btwalso never been deadmined, left on my own accord. if you're gonna throw shade at least take the time to get your facts straightyou may now resume embarrassing yourselves publicly

elyina wrote:if you think the removal of feedback from 4 years ago that was in the wrong section to begin with is trying to cover something up you're either beyond help or just posting in bad faith which i will not even engage with.

The intent does matter and I don't think anyone actually believes you were doing it maliciously, but the reasoning given for removing it have been debunked and most people agreed with my line of reasoning.

elyina wrote:37 btw

even if I was actually 37, why would that have any impact on the facts laid out here, this is at best, posting in bad faith while also pretending you don’t engage in that kind of thing, as it is, I think your behaviour here is pretty telling, especially when you decided to brag to my face about having feedback deleted even after I queried if it was a good idea, which is pretty tone deaf considering the subject.

I mean the only person publicly embarrassing them self right now is you.

The kind of cosseted admin that convinces me that my initial impression of the several over reaches in forum moderation to protect admins from peanut gallery posting and actual feedback in other areas of FNR was a grave mistake.

I simply don't see any value in them that justifies such measures to protect it or any way they or their rulings would warrant respect.

Cutting to the point trying to turn naming policy something I have opposed personally into voldemorting the drat removed name and functionally making it forbidden to type IC for "Abiding by an admins ruling" is as ridiculous as killing an assistant for writing "hitler" on a piece of paper.

Seems extremely petty, harsh, and mean spirited in their application of the rules. I hope they change and take a good look at whether they're banning to make the server better before a trio of headmins that doesn't protect other admins at all costs regardless of quality comes in

Incomptinence wrote:The kind of cosseted admin that convinces me that my initial impression of the several over reaches in forum moderation to protect admins from peanut gallery posting and actual feedback in other areas of FNR was a grave mistake.

I simply don't see any value in them that justifies such measures to protect it or any way they or their rulings would warrant respect.

Cutting to the point trying to turn naming policy something I have opposed personally into voldemorting the drat removed name and functionally making it forbidden to type IC for "Abiding by an admins ruling" is as ridiculous as killing an assistant for writing "hitler" on a piece of paper.

The same could be said for jobban evading by going to the hop and we ban for that all the time

Nilons wrote:Seems extremely petty, harsh, and mean spirited in their application of the rules. I hope they change and take a good look at whether they're banning to make the server better before a trio of headmins that doesn't protect other admins at all costs regardless of quality comes in

I'm curious what brought you to such a conclusion, I don't seem to recall interacting with you much on the game servers. If you feel that way over a single ban that doesn't involve you then I don't know what to tell you.

I have to disagree with Dax’s feedback. When it comes to bringing down the hammer on people that deserve it, Ely is one of our best admins. He’s firm in his judgments, and if I’d say this derived from a strong understanding of the rules and how they’re meant to be enforced. I’m proud of Ely’s good work as an admin.