All Of Science Is A Lie

So whats is the universe then, I really want to hear your take on the whole universe. Are we made by accident? Was the universe random? (electrons
coming into existence) What is the fabric of space? What is the aether of space?

As I'm new to these subjects. And I really enjoy the cunningness from a lot of sneers here.

I understand that we have have an understanding of about 4% of the known universe.
Much of this knowledge has or will change do to new discoveries and so on.

I wonder how different the universe will look like, after those missing 96% of knowledge will someday will not be missing anymore.

Of course I don't fully agree on the statement all science is a lie, but all science regarding the universe seems to me like a lot of it really is
based on our imagination.
Which is a good thing IMO. But not nearly good enough to go all ad hominem on the OP.

So whats is the universe, then I really want to hear your take on the whole universe. Are we made by accident? Was the universe random? (electrons
coming into existence)

We exist as the product of electrons from the depths of space.

There are things I don't have the answer to, like why should electrons give rise to life and consciousness?

I personally think consciousness is a fundamental part of the universe that stands on its own.

I think that consciousness is what causes life to form and evolve into what we are today.

Given that, I think electrons must be in some way conscious or interact with consciousness. They obey a set rule of physics, but there is no clear
understanding of why this set rule of physics should give rise to life or intelligent thought.

The most logical explanation I can come up with is that the body is an antenna for consciousness and the brain is the processor. When we look at maps
of brain activity we can see different areas of the brain light up when different thoughts are invoked. However, we can't tell WHAT is causing those
thoughts to originate in the first place. We can only see the product of those thoughts, not what causes them.

We can also see single celled creature "thinking." They process information about their surroundings. They find food, move themselves about,
replicate when necessary, process food they intake. Since they have no brain but are in some way conscious, this further calls into question the
purely physical interpretation of consciousness.

Well, to go back to OP's statement, I tend to stand on that idea. A few years ago, in France, a man sued TPTB on the case that medicine was NOT a
science. In science, you have to make a prediction that can be reproduced independently. You can't have that with medicine because none of us react
the same way to a medicament. You will have a percentage that will have a likeness in reactions to any given drug, but not a hundred percent. huh-uh.
Can't have that!

And I guess some of you know that the "science" chemistry, well, the word itself comes from the late Greek "khêmeia" which means "black
magic". Since when a magic is a science... Officially?

Also, I agree with memeth1's second post. I trust the mechanical surgeon, not their "khêmeia" dispenser counterparts.

When you apply a force, you go in the opposite direction at that speed. But when the force is no longer applied, you revert to entropy (yet from
outside point of view you are actually moving in a direction). Since you are in relative entropy, you can then apply a new force.

This will increase your speed because of entropy. Therefore by doing this process countless times, you will eventually end up going faster than the
speed of light.

Also, objects moving faster than the speed of light do NOT INCREASE in MASS. They only "Appear to increase their mass - relatively". In reality
their mass remains the same as it always was.

So there will not be any reasons why traveling FTL is impossible. It is totally possible and actually apparently simple.

Also, the physics inside the cockpit of the spaceship will not change either. It is in entropy.

This type of thinking gets slammed on by the mainstream science all the time, except Michio Kaku told me he didn't see anything wrong with it. So at
least 1 scientist knows WTF I'm talking about.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.