Time to have a lie down. That's a contender for most ridiculous post of the year on here, and we've had a few so far.

That's in the top 5 for sure haha. I love eisos defence. Just needs to be faster and more aggressive in attack. Post contact metres arnt great. In saying that a lot of forwards could improve in that area.

That's in the top 5 for sure haha. I love eisos defence. Just needs to be faster and more aggressive in attack. Post contact metres arnt great. In saying that a lot of forwards could improve in that area.

Speed 4/5
Explosiveness 4/5
Ability 3/5
Experience/ number of games 5/5
Wrongness of head 4/5

Total 20/25

The higher the score the more effective ploddering !

summary : he's a plodder , nothing to write home about ...
But to give him credit he's a pretty good defender !!

Hi Hobbo. What’s wrongness of head?

Hobbo has this weird reasoning that you have to be a pretty boy to play Rugby League and if your not pretty your a plodder

Why he rates Chee Kam so highly

It's my scale, and when you are grading at a potential plodder, ugliness comes into it. Can anyone name for me a good or even decent looking plodder?

I believe however that Hobbo is miss-applying the fourth cetegory. It should be # matches vs ability, i.e. the best plodders are renowned for lacking speed or skill, and yet can still wrack up a decent length if career.

Jack Buchanan is a real Grade A plodder and somehow managed 41 NRL games and 33 ESL games.

Time to have a lie down. That's a contender for most ridiculous post of the year on here, and we've had a few so far.

That's in the top 5 for sure haha. I love eisos defence. Just needs to be faster and more aggressive in attack. Post contact metres arnt great. In saying that a lot of forwards could improve in that area.

Corey Paterson > Matt Eisenhuth

Luckily I will take your advice and not listen to you on this forum..

Cred = 0...

Almost as bad as that bloke who suggested Milone might be the next Renouf ......

Eisenhuth is a real asset to this team
He is a fighter in life and has fought hard for his place on this team
He has a great attitude in both
Some of us forum users need to remember where he has come from a few years ago to where he is today
It really is a feel good story
He is mixing it with the very best and holding his own while still very young
He is only going to get better
I am sure that Matt would have had plenty of other teams looking at him but he re signed with us because he believes in our team and the future this club has
He may even teach some of you doomsayers out there to stay positive and never give up
He hasn't

Speed 4/5
Explosiveness 4/5
Ability 3/5
Experience/ number of games 5/5
Wrongness of head 4/5

Total 20/25

The higher the score the more effective ploddering !

summary : he's a plodder , nothing to write home about ...
But to give him credit he's a pretty good defender !!

Hi Hobbo. What’s wrongness of head?

Hobbo has this weird reasoning that you have to be a pretty boy to play Rugby League and if your not pretty your a plodder

Why he rates Chee Kam so highly

It's my scale, and when you are grading at a potential plodder, ugliness comes into it. Can anyone name for me a good or even decent looking plodder?

I believe however that Hobbo is miss-applying the fourth cetegory. It should be # matches vs ability, i.e. the best plodders are renowned for lacking speed or skill, and yet can still wrack up a decent length if career.

Jack Buchanan is a real Grade A plodder and somehow managed 41 NRL games and 33 ESL games.