That'd be funny if Nets fans just mass mailed resumes to the Nets facilities that just said "Not Billy King" on them. What I can't tell though is if Nets fans are buying into these trades or not.

The Joe Johnson trade was bad, but I think if D-Will stays Johnson will be a better player than he has been since the offense won't have to go through him so he can catch and shoot a little more. It MAY hide his slipping athleticism. He's still just not a max player, and you could probably get roughly the same numbers from OJ Mayo for half the cost (not that I'm a big Mayo fan).

The Gerald Wallace move (trade and contract) was awful. You could have got someone who gave you just as much as Wallace at #6 at a quarter of the cost. Then trading the rest of the team for Dwight is stupid too. This team will not age very well over the next few years (mainly Johnson and Wallace who tie up about $30 million a year for the next 4).

Billy King: Because any time you can trade away the #6 pick for a guy who opted out and needed to be overpaid to stay, along with trading away a roster of expiring contracts for a walking 4-year $90 million dollar contract that almost takes you out of the hunt for the league's 3rd best player, you have to do it.

I'm sure they do, I knew of Lin when he was at Harvard and hoped he'd get a chance in the NBA one day. It's just that he'll be remembered as a Knick if he stays there because that's where he established himself.

I know what you mean, there have been too many years of roster overhauls. Too much "He used to be pretty good, maybe there's something left in his tank". But on the other hand, I don't want to be wishing for next year's number one lottery pick either.