A few days ago, the United Nations published a
document which indicated that historically unprecedented levels of human
activity were causing dramatic changes to the variety of plant and animal life
in the world. The report said that that many species had become extinct over
the past 50 years, and that up to one million of the remaining eight million
varieties of life that account for biodiversity globally may disappear within
decades.

The hard-hitting 1,500-page report, the ‘2019 Global
Assessment Study’ was compiled by hundreds of international experts. Based on
thousands of scientific studies it identified multiple human factors at work
including the over exploitation of resources on land and in the sea, climate
change, pollution, and changes in land use.

It indicated, for example, that globally 25% of plant
and animal species are vulnerable to extinction, and that a reduction in the
diversity of cultivated crops and domesticated breeds of animals meant that
farming will in future be less resilient to climate change, as well as to pests
and pathogens. The report detailed how plastic pollution has increased tenfold
since 1980 affecting sea life and set out how increasingly the demand for food,
energy and materials is at the expense of nature’s ability to continue to
provide.

Introducing the study, which is intended to provide a
scientific basis for policymaking, UNESCO’s Director-General, Audrey Azoulay,
said that it put the world on notice that protecting biodiversity had become as
vital a fight as that to address climate change. It was, she said, “our
responsibility towards future generations”, adding that the report meant that
“no one will be able to claim that they did not know”.

Such knowledge is of course important, but there
remains a huge gap between awareness and the implementation of policies and
remedial measures in biodiversity-rich regions such the Caribbean. This is
because developing nations often reach less than satisfactory compromises
between the need for investor-led development, economic growth, and local
concerns about protecting what makes a country or region environmentally
special.

Last November the Caribbean published its own
biodiversity study. Although scarcely noticed, it assessed the progress and
difficulties the region is experiencing in trying to move towards achieving
each of the 20 global biodiversity targets agreed in 2010 in Aichi in Japan.

As ‘The State of Biodiversity in the Caribbean
Community’ explains, the main threats facing the nations of CARICOM are the
destruction and fragmentation of plant and animal life due to increasing
urbanisation, the conversion of lands for tourism and commercial development,
and the expansion of agriculture. Such challenges it notes have been
exacerbated by the rapid growth of populations and increased economic activity,
as well as by climate change in the form of ocean warming, more intense
hurricanes and severe drought.

In an indication of how difficult to resolve the
biodiversity challenges set by the UN will be, the Caribbean’s report notes
that conservation and sustainable management of biodiversity in the region is
often hampered by the competing goals of economic growth and national
development.

What the CARICOM review suggests is that while the
Caribbean is of global significance when it comes to biodiversity, there is an
unresolved tension between what is desirable ecologically and the need for
development.

That is to say, the region has yet to fully address the
necessary trade-offs between the environment, the requirement of governments
for revenue, the private sector and international investors for profit, and
pressure from growing populations for economic and social development: all of
which is to say nothing about the impact of avarice.

Greed apart, the characteristics of this far from easy
to resolve conundrum can be seen in the detail of the Caribbean’s review
document and its recommendations, for example in relation to land clearance
subsidies for agriculture, and role of the private sector and tourism.

On subsidies for land clearance it notes that reduced
land taxes for productive agricultural lands and subsidised fuel and pesticides
are leading to increased forest clearances and degraded soils. Such efforts to
stimulate sectoral growth and productivity, the report observes, are creating
unfavourable conditions for Caribbean biodiversity. It attributes the problem
to the fact that most incentive and subsidy mechanisms do not fall under the
direct control of ministries responsible for biodiversity management, and that
progress on biodiversity targets are “limited by the constrained fiscal
conditions prevalent in the region”.

The CARICOM review also observes that although tourism
is the leading contributor to GDP in many CARICOM countries, inadequately
regulated and managed it can cause major pressures on and damage to ecosystems
and the ability of the sector to provide services, including those necessary to
attract tourists and tourism investment.

The review makes several recommendations including the
need for stronger regulatory and institutional frameworks for the environment;
mechanisms to ensure compliance; greater availability of resources; improved
coordination between government agencies and with the private sector; and the
need to mainstream biodiversity awareness across economic sectors and business.

Despite the importance of addressing such issues in
the Caribbean and globally, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that achieving
full implementation of what was agreed in Aichi nearly a decade ago will be
very difficult. Not only do vested commercial interests stand in the way in the
region and elsewhere, but the pressure they are able to exert can be hard for
politicians to resist in financially under resourced nations that continue to
need investment and sustainable employment.

As with climate change, satisfactorily addressing
biodiversity requires more than talk, consensus and the adoption of reports,
especially when there are states that reject interdependence and pay as little
attention to the environment and the impact of climate change as they do to
inequity and social justice.

Thankfully, however, much of the Caribbean thinks
differently about both the environment and its social commitment and is still
one of the world’s greatest centres of biodiversity.

And that is why the region ought to be emphasising action, and how with support it intends to deliver an integrated response to the now well documented biodiversity and other environmental challenges it faces.

David Jessop is a consultant to the Caribbean Council and can be contacted at david.jessop@caribbean-council.org

Previous columns can be found at www.caribbean-council.org

12 March 2019

The views and opinions expressed in the View from Europe are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Caribbean Council.

Company Information: The Caribbean Council is a company limited by guarantee that is registered in England and Wales under registration number 4276621. It is registered for VAT in the UK under number 998253657. Its registered address is Temple Chambers, 3-7 Temple Avenue, London EC4Y 0HP.