For the first time in a while, I found myself on a transcontinental flight without WiFi access or in-flight television. I generally try to avoid being electronically sequestered for any amount of time, especially on a football Sunday, so I couldn’t help but feel it was a punishment of sorts — at least at first.

But as someone who makes a living being paranoid about information security, I forced myself to think about the positives (in between two newspapers, a magazine and a John Grisham novel), and was struck by how even I am far too willing to sacrifice my personal information security on the altar of convenience – in this instance for Internet access and the alleviation of boredom on a long flight.

So what should we give up when getting online a mile high?

1. Online Shopping

In addition to being a potential money pit, online shopping on a public Internet connection might allow a fellow traveler to invade your cyberspace and turn your laptop into a transmitter of personally identifying information (PII).

3. Emailing

Though you can hardly peek at a screen on a WiFi-enabled flight without seeing someone’s inbox, the same people who might love your financial information might well settle for phishing or spear-phishing you in order to hijack your contact list or compromise your computer and turn it into yet another botnet or spam enabler.

Get Your Free Credit Score & Monitoring

4. Social Media

Not being a Facebook devotee, I am not as subject to social networking withdrawal as so many others I know. But without the ability to “check in” at airports on Foursquare or Facebook, and being geo-tagged on Twitter and Instagram, being offline while on the road means you’re not broadcasting to frenemies that you’re not at home (think burglars), or where you might be found (think stalkers).

5. Getting Your Devices Out At All

If you can’t use it, you tend to leave it alone — my cellphone, for instance, stayed safely tucked in my pocket for the duration of the flight, though I did crack open my sequestered laptop. Without the ability to connect to the wider world, many people simply leave their computers (iPads, tablets, etc.) packed in the overhead bin (and maybe that’s not such a bad thing). After all, every bathroom trip and leg-stretching walkabout — especially on a dimly-lit plane full of sleeping people — leaves one’s laptop readily accessible to the ill-intentioned and even more personal and financial information exposed to either random snoops or light-fingered thieves.

Without the ability to log on this time, my limited laptop use mitigated the risk of my leaving it in the seatback pocket, or tucked away between two seats, where someone might have grabbed it and possibly found a way to crack my code — gaining access to my most meaningful contacts or grabbing sufficient morsels of information to allow them to convince my contacts or financial institutions that they were me.

But while my enforced disconnection made me reflect upon how, even for me, boredom and convenience sometimes overwhelm my hard-earned knowledge about the perils of a cybercrime, I also had the opportunity to think about all the other ways we blindly trust that our information will stay private in order to take advantage of modern conveniences — like paying with a credit card at a doctor’s office, using a debit card at the grocery store, handing over our plastic to waiters at our favorite restaurants, reading off those 16 digits when ordering take-out, leaving car registrations in the glove box during an oil change, or handing over keys to a parking attendant.

Can we ever really be sure they have no desire to learn more about us than we deem appropriate? Unfortunately, the answer is a resounding no. In that way, it’s a bit like flying — you have to sit back, trust the system, and hope for the best.

Image: Purestock

Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Sign up for our Credit Report Card and receive the latest tips & advice from our team of 50+ credit and money experts as well as a FREE Credit Score and action plan. Sign up now.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

The offers that appear on Credit.com’s website are from companies from which Credit.com receives compensation. This compensation may influence the selection, appearance, and order of appearance of the offers listed on the website. However, this compensation also facilitates the provision by Credit.com of certain services to you at no charge. The website does not include all financial services companies or all of their available product and service offerings.

Editorial content is not provided by any issuer. Any opinions, analyses, reviews, or recommendations expressed here are those of the author's alone, and have not been reviewed, approved, or otherwise endorsed by any issuer.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.