httpd-test-dev mailing list archives

Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>doesn't seem to be right. sub is a compile time directive, so putting it
>>in a conditional doesn't prevent from it being compiled:
>
>
> indeed. guess I wasn't thinking, which seems to be happening lots lately.
No worries :) There is a way too many things to think about.
>>Moreover it now introduces a warning in mp2 build
>>Subroutine MY::libscan redefined at ./Makefile.PL line 148.
>
>
> ugh.
>
>
>>so we need to do the usual ugly workaround for MM :(
>
>
> usual?
I mean usual MM namespace workarounds, not specific to A-T :(
>>Can you fix those? I can do it if you don't have the time.
>
>
> well, I don't really have the time, but since it's my problem I'll take care
> of it. that is, if you can tell me exactly what needs to be done - I would
> probably just put the if logic inside the sub, but I suspect there needs to
> be more than that for mod_perl's sake?
to make the sub definition runtime, you just use:
*MY::foo = sub ...;
but unrelated we need to workaround with colliding identical function in mp2.
I'll take care of it.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com