<Richard.Bolen@gxs.com> wrote:
>
> Does each searchable have it's own copy of Term and TermInfo
> arrays? So the amount in memory would grow with each new
> Searchable instance? If so, it might be worthwhile to implement a
> singleton MultiSearcher that is closed and re-opened periodically.
> What do you think?
Yes, yes and yes a single shared MultiSearcher would be better.
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org