Don’t Be Confused: Backscatter Machines Are Not Being Eliminated

The “naked body” airport scanners are being scrapped—but that does not mean the end of dangerous x-ray airport screening machines. Action Alert!

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has agreed to drop its contract with OSI Rapiscan, manufacturer of the airport body scanners that produce a naked image of travelers, because of privacy concerns. This really isn’t much of a victory, however. TSA has signed a new contract with a different manufacturer of scanners, whose machines will still have the radiation backscatter problem we reminded you about last month.TSA decided to end its $5 million contract with OSI Rapiscan because the company couldn’t meet its congressionally mandated deadline to address privacy concerns and create software that showed images of travelers that would be more generic and less explicit. TSA had already decommissioned a third of Rapiscan’s backscatter machines and will now get rid of the remaining 173.TSA has meanwhile maintained its contract with makers of scanners that use millimeter waves, which produce a generic unisex outline that resembles the cartoon character Gumby. The agency could have gone to all millimeter wave scanning, which is thought to be safer. But no, backscatter machines will still be in airports. TSA signed a $245 million dollar contract with American Science and Engineering, a company that uses the same x-ray backscatter technology as Rapiscan for their machines, but which also has software that addresses privacy concerns.In other words, while passengers may not have their privacy violated any more, they still will have their health endangered. As you may recall from our report on the machines last July, they emit low levels of ionizing radiation with levels that could be 10 to 20 times higher than the manufacturer’s calculations. A report from the Department of Homeland Security found inconsistencies in how the machines are calibrated to ensure radiation safety and image quality, and noted that not all TSA screeners have completed required radiation safety training. Millions of people go through these machines—and ProPublica reports that up to 100 US passengers could get cancer from them every year.Both TSA’s own procurement specifications and a subsequent report by the Government Accountability Office indicate that the machines were never designed to detect powdered explosives. This is particularly ironic since the machines’ use was initially justified after the underwear bomber incident—which involved powdered explosives!The Rapiscan machines were selected by Michael Chertoff when he was head of the TSA under President Bush. As soon as he left office, he signed on with the company as a very highly paid promoter of the machines.By the way, Rapiscan’s machines aren’t disappearing—they’re just being relocated to government agencies!Action Alert! Congress needs to know that now is the time to get rid of all the backscatter machines because of their danger to our health—privacy is not the only concern! Tell them TSA needs to use millimeter wave scanners exclusively. A failure to do so when the existing machines are being taken out of airports is inexcusable. Take action now!

4 responses to “Don’t Be Confused: Backscatter Machines Are Not Being Eliminated”

Are they kidding us?
Already banned for use in Europe but here in the US, these guys are playing games using ionizing radiation to check for items these scanners cannot even detect?
All this for travel while potentially causing more cancer?
I read most people the TSA stop with these scanners are skipping out on child support. Terrorists indeed!

Keep on them! But don’t forget, there are alternatives to flying, in case you want to boycott all air travel. I quit flying years ago to avoid the 4th Amendment violations against unreasonable search and seizure, and their unhealthy x-ray machines. When we get around to restoring the Bill of Rights, I may consider flying again. Until then, I’ll fly Amtrak.

Related Articles

Last week we reported on the botched language in the new Leahy bill, and how it was on a fast track. Last Thursday, unfortunately, the Senate passed the bill. But there’s still time to get the House of Representatives to listen to us! Take action now to ensure the House doesn’t introduce and pa...

Back in September 2014, the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) released model legislation for the creation of an interstate medical licensing compact. The stated intent of the legislation is to streamline the licensing process for physicians who wish to apply for medical licenses in multipl...

According to a paper in the current British Medical Journal, “more than 50% of the adult population (in Great Britain) had insufficient levels of vitamin D and 16% had severe deficiency during winter and spring”. Another recent study found that an alarming 69 percent of pregnant women (and 78 pe...

A promising treatment has shown remarkable success in treating autism—but will the FDA turn it into a Big Pharma blockbuster? Action Alert!
Recently we reported on the advancements in research regarding fecal microbiota transplants (FMT), which harness the power of the gut microbiom...

These three want lab-testing pioneer Theranos to be history. The future of medicine is at stake. Action Alert!
In 2013, we reported on Theranos, a new and exciting venture that had the potential to revolutionize medicine by making medical testing cheaper, faster, and more convenient. The basic idea ...

An underhanded maneuver could make the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) even worse than it was originally. Action Alert!
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) picked up on an almost imperceptible but vitally important change in the TPP text.
It was widely understood that the text had been complete...

First NameLast NamePhone NumberE-mail Address
Please leave this field empty

Any medical information contained in this site is for informational use only. It is not for use in self-diagnosis or treatment. Please consult with a qualified physician concerning the prudence of and before undertaking any change in diet, treatment for disease, use of any drug, or cessation in use of any prescribed drug.