Despicable conduct by Judy Wood and an incredibly stupid thread created by one of her shills . . .

An incredibly stupid post by someone who has no understanding of science . . .

Abraham, Speculation is an indispensable stage of scientific inquiries. One has to consider all the possible explanations in order to insure that the true hypothesis is not omitted from consideration on the ground that it is unpleasant, sounds far-fetched, or is unconventional. Try reading the first parts of "Thinking about 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK", because your scientific education is severely lacking. Were I embracing speculations as CONCLUSIONS without considering their relationship to the evidence, THEN you might have a case. Instead, you display your ignorance of science by completely suppressing that I am not ACCEPTING these speculations as conclusions but only as POSSIBILITIES, where I make a point of featuring students of 9/11 who have ideas that may or may not deserve further exploration, as I have done with video fakery/no planes and, of course, what happened to the WTC. I would guess that I have been more open-minded to a wider range of approaches toward controversial issues in 9/11 than has anyone else in the movement. Your complaint is simply absurd.

You must have a short memory, but I was the person who featured Judy Wood on my radio program some fifteen (15) times and have stuck up for her through thick and through thin, including featuring her as my principal speaker at the Madison conference. Have you never watched "The Science and Politics of 9/11: What's Controversial, What's Not?" I would think that you would be ashamed of attacking me on grounds like these, which are the very ones that have been directed against Judy and her work. If you read through the thread to which you have contributed in your response to Jeffrey Orling, you will see that I have been supportive of her work throughout. I was about to post a note of thanks to you and Andrew for showing up and, in fact, I just reposted your post with those excellent links on a thread of mine at ATS. I really think some of you do not know where your best interests lie, where creating threads like this to attack me when I have been so supportive of Judy for so long is completely unfounded. I am sorry, Abraham, but you have your head where the sun does not shine.

Originally Posted by Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez

This is an important clip from one of the most unscientific researchers I have ever known to be involved in 9/11 research. I encourage you to listen closely to his words, and ask yourself, "why would he be speculating like this when he could be discussing the overwhelming sum of easily verifiable physical evidence that Dr. Judy Wood has compiled?"

Mr. Fetzer was unscientifically speculating, or entertaining unscientific speculation, about reasons for the extreme lack of debris at ground zero, even though it was and is very obvious that much of the debris was transformed to fine dust. Mr. Fetzer's continued promotion of unscientific speculation, at the expense of scientific discussion of physical evidence, is something that everyone should consider (in my opinion). The lack of WTC debris in the rubble piles is briefly touched on by these two videos just in case any of you are not familiar with this topic:

Your willingness to engage in unscientific speculation, when you should be engaging in scientific discussion of the evidence, is very telling to me.

Your willingness to unnecessarily mix and muddle important evidence with your wild, unscientific speculation, is very telling to me.

Your willingness to appear as a supporter of Dr. Judy Wood's conclusions, only to address the evidence she has gathered in such unscientific, discrediting ways, is very telling to me.

It is quite obvious that you are not interested in helping others understand the truth, as you have spent a great deal of time, enegy, and effort, doing exactly the opposite.

(I will spare you some embarrassment by not posting the clip from your September 2009 radio show when you entertained / promoted unscientific and disrespectful speculations about Dr. Wood's personal life, even though you should have been raising awareness of the important physical evidence from 9/11 instead of promoting wild speculation.)

Despicable conduct by Judy Wood . . .

This contrived YouTube with Judy Wood and one of her shills is beneath contempt. I am embarrassed I even know someone who would so grossly misrepresent the views of others, Phil Jayhan and his collaborator, as though they were mine! I really didn't think that Judy could sink so low--but now I am convinced! Tell Judy it is apparent that she needs professional help. Unreal!

This is an important clip from one of the most unscientific researchers I have ever known to be involved in 9/11 research. I encourage you to listen closely to his words, and ask yourself, "why would he be speculating like this when he could be discussing the overwhelming sum of easily verifiable physical evidence that Dr. Judy Wood has compiled?"

Mr. Fetzer was unscientifically speculating, or entertaining unscientific speculation, about reasons for the extreme lack of debris at ground zero, even though it was and is very obvious that much of the debris was transformed to fine dust. Mr. Fetzer's continued promotion of unscientific speculation, at the expense of scientific discussion of physical evidence, is something that everyone should consider (in my opinion).