>
> Is anyone out there actually engaged in or planning to undertake this
> proposed checking of classical usage with a TLG search?
>
> It would be a shame (it seems to me) to let this thread lapse with such an
> important and relevant piece of information missing from it. But more than
> a week has passed now (am I too impatient?) and nothing more has been said.
>
It just so happens that through the kindness of Bob Jewett, I have the
TLG at my disposal. So I'll run a search today and try to post it to the
list as quickly as possible.