Memorable for the fact that it comes from the preiod when you could say Melanie Griffith was cute, and people would agree with you, (as opposed to laugh and spit and kick you), this film really needed an injection of gratuitous nudity - it's not as though Melanie wasn't doing nudity! christ, I've seen her norks hundreds of times.....she must have had a bad boob job, as it was POST boob job that she stopped flashing her norks, damn sloppy surgeons and their scars!!! But as I was saying, all the classic films of this genre HAVE NUDITY.....but not this one....gratuitous that is...

For the record, I love this movie.It's got loads of guns [I am to guns like gearheads are to cars], a sex robot, yuppie cultists and Melanie Griffith before she married Bandaris and turned skaggy.Sure, her voice sounds like she gargled with napalm and powdered glass, but I'm a freak for the gun girls[I love you Ripley].I watch this flick every time it comes on T.V and so should you.

Back then, we were called "true fans" and not "stalkers". I still want one. Never met a wummin who liked this movie. Don't know any guys who don't love this movie. Watch it every time it's on the tv. Yup.

Who played the robot? I thought that there was a story there... can't remember what it was... something about it being her only movie and she either was a porn star before or after and died not long after the film? Anyone remember?

An AWSOME film. INSPIRING. This is truly art. I can't open the dvd case any more though, it's stuck. Stuck tight. Stuck sticky. I love this film. No really, I do. I love it.I love because I no longer have to accept that the film industry expects you to produce great films to have a career. I can watch this film, drink heavily and foget that I have missed every opportunity that has come my way to create cinema. I am old now. I wish I was dead.

I get a bad feeling when I remember this movie. Itís bad on so many levels.

First of all, I saw it in 1991 with my then-friend Peter. He was a devout Christian, bodybuilder, and master of cars, single-handedly restoring a 1967 Mustang from total junk to mint condition at the time. That Mustang of his was actually the reason he chose the movie--based on the Mustang appearing prominently on the cover. I agreed because it looked like a science fiction movie.

About a third of the way through he realized what a B-movie it was and refused to finish watching it, returning it to the video store then and there instead.

On top of that, he and I arenít friends anymore. In 1996, I accidentally called his house at six in the morning because I had been sleeping weird hours and when woke up I thought it was six in the evening. He hasnít spoken to me since, except at our high school reunion, where he talked to me a little while glaring at me judgmentally.

In addition to that, the movie was horrible. In spite of having a cool car and cool chick and a future with sexy robots, it manages to break two of my rules by being set in a post-apocalyptic future *and* by taking place mostly in the desert. This is one of movies that led to those rules being put in place, in fact. It also made me hate Tim Thomerson, and I didnít get over that until I saw him in Trancers and a guest spot on 21 Jump Street as a crew-cut substitute principal who goes a little to far in enforcing discipline. Cherry 3000, you evil movie--no one should be made to hate Tim Thomerson! He was the only good thing in the Nemesis movies!

I still have yet to see the last half of this movie. It traumatized me that badly. I may very well go the rest of my life without finishing this movie.