Creationist bloggers can be infuriating. If one has infuriated you by persisting in nonsense even when corrected, or refusing to reply to your criiticsm, you may feel driven to recording the fact. If so, you may register your disapproval here and hope a response is forthcoming.

http://www.icr.org/article/8952"What were the Ice Age dwellers like who engineered this big rock into place? Primitive, freshly-emerged-from-apes sub-humans known only from ape-to-man illustrations would not have carved, drilled, transported, and erected such tremendous stone monuments—but Noah's descendants sure could have."

Oh yes - evolutionists are well known for claiming that at the time at which this Pantelleria Vecchia Bank monolith was constructed 'primitive, freshly-emerged-from-apes sub-humans' were roaming the Earth, aren't they Mr science denier Brian Thomas. (A 'recent' date - but which nevertheless is LESS recent than the date YEC science deniers assign to 'Noah's Worldwide Flood'.)

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 9X15300535"The monolith is composed of calcirudites of Late Pleistocene age, as determined from radiocarbon measurements conducted on several shell fragments extracted from the rock samples... Extrapolating ages from the local sea level curve, we infer that seawater inundated the inner lands at 9350 ± 200 year B.P., the upper limit which can be reasonably taken for the site abandonment. This discovery provides evidence for a significant Mesolithic human activity in the Sicilian Channel region."

But Thomas ignores this and hopes his readers will too - and he hasn't finished: "Ancient monument-building geniuses don't fit the evolutionary scheme". Garbage. All they don't fit is the Thomas strawman with all its false dates, with millions of years of Earth history being 'crammed' into less than 10,000 years.