Well, I finally built my 60M team (league number was provided on the other thread). I hate the team. I don't have enough PA or IP. I was just glad to find a way to fit a real-life team (w/4 twists) under a $60M cap.

Posted by schwarze on 10/29/2013 2:05:00 PM (view original):Well, I finally built my 60M team (league number was provided on the other thread). I hate the team. I don't have enough PA or IP. I was just glad to find a way to fit a real-life team (w/4 twists) under a $60M cap.

You did it to yourself!!!

I managed to build 3 teams that fit under the cap. Didn't really love any of them but I think I'm ready to pick one and move on.

Just finishing up my $90M team. I'm having more difficulties finalizing my team than I expected. The "one player per season" rule is good rule, but is making things a bit complicated. Plus the DH is making this more like an $85M theme, which is good. People can't afford to roster all the stud SPs.

In general, the DHs take a big chunk out of the budget - having to pay for 1 more hitter and 30-40 more IP. Unless the DH league is the 60M or 120M league, it always creates a big gap in player quality between one league and the next most expensive one.

And the one player per year rule is good. Gives you one more thing to think about when drafting each position. "This player is really good, but can I afford to burn this year already?"