So this is where these antifa/communist/radicals are headed??? Delegitimize the founding principles of this country, ignoring the positive legitimate and legal progress with laws like The Emancipation Proclamation and The 19th Amendment.

Beside their #1 choice, total Anarchy, the only way to install the political correctness orthodoxy in a free society is by installing totalitarian and fascist regimes like Venezuela/Cuba or theocracies like Iran or Indonesia that can control free speech and thought.

Outside of leftist street violence and physical intimidation of people with an opposite views.... what do they intend to put in place of the Constitution or our Bill of Rights that they abhor that they claim is founded on white supremacy???

At this point, they can't use the word govern.... because they only want to live in a Utopia via "benevolent" dictatorship... and we know how they ended up with Stalin and Mao.

TheBigGuy wrote:Please... you have been desperate to be relevant for the past two weeks. We already explained to you that the flags on display are not confederate battle flags but all the state flags of the Union.

Because YOU are offended, the equitable solution is to take down all the state flags and leave the empty flag poles. That will also placate anyone else that takes offense to any other symbolism reflected in the other state flags.

Then can we all be happy?

Quote:

GrovePath wrote:What - no Trump Flag waving?

Even on Fox News, normally a redoubt of Trump support, with the anchor Guy Benson saying that Mr. Trump “lost me” when he insisted that some “very fine people” participated in the white supremacist rally.

It should be noted that the ONLY reason that the confederate flag is emblazoned on the Mississippi state flag is due to racism (History of Mississippi state flag). They didn't start with a flag containing a flag that represents secession.

The reality is, white supremacy in all its forms needs to be wiped out. There is no place for racism.

Did we leave up the statues of Saddam Hussein in Iraq because of "history"? Did we leave up statues of King George when declared independence because of "history"? Do the Germans have statues of Hitler up because of "history"?

Paying homage with a public statue to people that fought for the "right" to own other human beings is unacceptable. The place for such things would be museums notating the dark history and their repugnant cause.

"Did the USA lay down when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor", Yawn...

I think you need to exam all the state flags and emblems because there are many instances of dare I say "cultural appropriation"... you can start with Arizona and New Mexico.

It really seems like the US is experiencing it's own version the Communist Chinese Cultural Revolution and you have to wonder about the extremes people will go to cleanse all vestiges of white supremacy, real or imagined.

Please... you have been desperate to be relevant for the past two weeks. We already explained to you that the flags on display are not confederate battle flags but all the state flags of the Union.

Because YOU are offended, the equitable solution is to take down all the state flags and leave the empty flag poles. That will also placate anyone else that takes offense to any other symbolism reflected in the other state flags.

Then can we all be happy?

Quote:

GrovePath wrote:What - no Trump Flag waving?

Even on Fox News, normally a redoubt of Trump support, with the anchor Guy Benson saying that Mr. Trump “lost me” when he insisted that some “very fine people” participated in the white supremacist rally.

TheBigGuy wrote:So why wouldn't PSEG or even electric car manufacturers want in on this market... product distribution is already in place?

Why aren't PSEG and other entities jumping on this? Short sightedness...

PSE&G probably stands to profit more by selling energy to charging station operators, instead of cutting themselves a discount on the rates and then making up the profits in the charging station business, where they have no unique expertise or competitve advantage.

It's interesting question PSEG has a home consumer appliance division. They compete against private business for that multitude of home services.

If someone called them to modify an electrical outlet in their garage as a charging station, seems like they could do the work... or would home owner look for a private electrician. It can't be very complicated work.

TheBigGuy wrote:I am curious to know who pays for all these "free" charging stations?

Who said anything about free charging stations? The stations are "for pay". Rates are based on kWh.

So the public charging stations are similar to traditional gas stations? The driver uses a credit card/pays cash for an electric hookup.

So why wouldn't PSEG or even electric car manufacturers want in on this market... product distribution is already in place?

Why aren't PSEG and other entities jumping on this? Short sightedness... The local NA (PADNA) actually came out against the dedicated EV parking, because "the demand is not there". My argument is that that having dedicated EV parking ahead of demand is exactly how you get people to start adopting these technologies. Waiting for demand is silly. A few years ago, I mulled getting a Tesla Model S, but opted against it because there was no easy way to get it charged. Sadly, a few months after that decision, I moved into The ArtHouse, and the EV parking is right in front and it would have been a perfect solution. I honestly feel that installing and making available charging stations is the perfect way to encourage people to buy and use electric vehicles. During "peak" hours, the charging station is essentially a meter (you pay for each hour you are connected, regardless of energy usage) and during off peak hours you pay for the energy you consume to charge your vehicle.

I used to pickup electric Zip Cars there... great for neighborhood use, then they pulled them and left us with more high priced ridiculous suvs/minivans. The market issue you described is exactly where "cable tv" was 35 years ago. The providers only installed in dense populated neighborhoods for a quicker ROI on limited distribution network.

In this case distribution is there, demographics are right, seems logical for PSEG to give it a try. Am I right in assuming that there is a universal electric outlet common to the different electric model manufacturers?

Pebble wrote:I find it quite funny how delicate and pathetic the white males are on this message board. Seriously, colleges are predominantly white but a few people get a chance to better themselves and they cry foul. There has never been a white person denied a college education due to a minority getting into one school.

The fact that they decide to continue their racist agenda really shows how pathetic they are.

What happened to "picking yourself up by your boot straps" or "overcoming obstacles"? Seems that those slogans only apply to minorities.

Such a sad lot you people are. Your wittle feewings were hurt...

More progressive racial double talk ... "There has never been a white person denied a college education due to a minority getting into one school."

A "college education" and "college admission" are very carefully chosen phrases... there have been white people denied college admission to the college of their choice because of minority preferences, over academic performance.

This practice has been upheld by SCOTUS. If these little white racist students wanted to pick themselves up by their bootstraps, perhaps they should consider attending a HWCU?

If those white students were better students then they would have beaten out other white students in order to get into the school of their choice. They FAILED to do so. As such, they bemoan the fact that someone else gets a chance.

It's a pity that you fall into the category of protecting the poor wittle delicate snowflake that wasn't smart enough to get into the school they wanted to.

Additionally, I want to point out that Duke, Notre Dame and whole host of other schools provide college slots to white students that wouldn't have gotten into the school if it wasn't for their athletic ability. Many of those students wouldn't have been accepted to the school based on academics alone. Instead, they got there through athletics and barely passing the minimum academic requirements. Why aren't you bemoaning this policy?

A whole lot of "bemoaning" with you today... amazing how you make a whole series of assumptions, mix them with a sociological race theory to support your absolutely absurd contentions.

So if I try to connect your scattered dots, you believe that all white kids come from a 1% Lifestyle (progressive term not mine) and that there should be a white on white competion for college admission slots while minority students should be just admitted because their race is all they have to offer?

And somehow you think that legacy programs are inherently racist and exclusionary, so they to should be abolished to making the playing field more fair for students that want to compete on racial qualifications only.

And I am not even going to get going on your foolish NCAA comments about racial preferences for white athletes. It was an interesting choice of DIV1 Schools. I assume you picked Duke because of their excellent Men's Lacrosse Program?

Posted on: 8/3 18:09

Edited by TheBigGuy on 2017/8/3 18:27:16Edited by TheBigGuy on 2017/8/3 18:30:35

Pebble wrote:I find it quite funny how delicate and pathetic the white males are on this message board. Seriously, colleges are predominantly white but a few people get a chance to better themselves and they cry foul. There has never been a white person denied a college education due to a minority getting into one school.

The fact that they decide to continue their racist agenda really shows how pathetic they are.

What happened to "picking yourself up by your boot straps" or "overcoming obstacles"? Seems that those slogans only apply to minorities.

Such a sad lot you people are. Your wittle feewings were hurt...

More progressive racial double talk ... "There has never been a white person denied a college education due to a minority getting into one school."

A "college education" and "college admission" are very carefully chosen phrases... there have been white people denied college admission to the college of their choice because of minority preferences, over academic performance.

This practice has been upheld by SCOTUS. If these little white racist students wanted to pick themselves up by their bootstraps, perhaps they should consider attending a HWCU?

Worst case scenario, but still fun-case stalls till the election, Murphy gets to do the replacing, and Fulop gets in a steel cage fight with Torricelli over the appointment.

Not sure a Christie self appointment could be described as a best case scenario, he would vote against Trump every time. Which might be fun to watch a couple times.

I would pay to see your steel cage match. Since convicted felons like the Torch qualify, let's throw in Kushner Senior to keep conversation lively... could we get Russian judges?

And the democrats kept Frank Lautenberg on life support long enough to hold the other senate seat for Booker... can he rise from the dead again as an very long shot? Doubtful any of the other zombies on the senate floor would notice.

Azul_the_Cat wrote:While we are rolling back civil rights, why not go all the way back to when women couldn't vote and were considered property of their husbands? Let's all go back to the time when the only thing that mattered was you were white and male. Everyone else can go pound sand.

Yes... I am sure there are many cultures in the world that would agree with you... and let's bring back genital mutilation, oh wait we never practiced that in the US up until the last decade.

So much wasted energy on the Left fighting imaginary wrongs and completely ignoring reality.

TheBigGuy wrote:talk about Trump deflecting.... you challenge me on my sources related to another major national security breach involving the democrat leadership and their foreign national IT Admins then you do not repond, but go ahead and start this foolishness?

I am very happy to see the news media proudly announce that "first woman" formerly a man has made the grade joining an elite US military unit... I am sure women all over the country are proud too. Especially after so many other washed out in basic training to join the group. That is real progress!

WTF are you on? I asked you for a source to something you posted. How is that challenging you on your sources? You provided a source, and I moved on to another topic. Was I supposed to thank you or something? Did you forget to take your meds this morning?

LOL, a little edgy Azul? You seemed to be questioning the the substance of my comments (probably would have too if you found any material weaknesses)... Let's Move On, Nothing To See Here.

BTW, I also just noticed the arrested IT Admin just lawyered up with a guy who has long established connections to the Clintons. This must be one of those pro bono cases those K-Street types are so happy to take on during the idle days of summer in the swamp.

Azul_the_Cat wrote:Okay, just so I understand you, you think people with medical/psychiatric issues are pathetic? Or, are the people that want to defend minorities in this country from the oppressive backwards thinking politicians that want to role back civil rights the ones that are pathetic?

Never mind the fact that the Trump administration did this for pure political gains. When asked about the decision, a Trump administration official said "This forces Democrats in Rust Belt states like Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin to take complete ownership of this issue. How will blue collar voters in these states respond when senators up for re-election in 2018 like Debbie Stabenow are forced to make their opposition to this a key plank of their campaigns?"

If someone can pass the "tough for a good reason" exams to get into the military, what would being transgendered have to do with it? Is being gay just a psychiatric issue as well?

talk about Trump deflecting.... you challenge me on my sources related to another major national security breach involving the democrat leadership and their foreign national IT Admins then you do not repond, but go ahead and start this foolishness?

I am very happy to see the news media proudly announce that "first woman" formerly a man has made the grade joining an elite US military unit... I am sure women all over the country are proud too. Especially after so many other washed out in basic training to join the group. That is real progress!

TheBigGuy wrote:I really wish the democrats would focus on the true hacking scandal which is the 3 Pakistani brothers who were paid $4M (taxpayer money) as IT Sys Admins for Waaserman-Schultz and her slimey coven of witches.

Do you really want to find the source of the DNC email leaks? Start with those creeps. They legally accessed the HoR Network and democrat email via her office computer for years. Well before she was fired last summer as the DNC chair.

The HRC campaign was crashing and burning because of those leaks. HRC stonewalled FBI forensics not permitting access to their "hacked" campaign computers and Deb WS is doing the same thing to FBI and Capital Police, stonewalling their criminal investigation, by not permitting access to government owned hardware.

Where does it all lead? Today, the ringleader brother was arrested by the FBI trying to flee the country back to where??? Pakistan... SuperMax or witness protection?

Care to provide a source for this claim?

Here is a basic background story from Fox.... but there is far more information out there regarding this family and the democrat coverup. Can you imagine the access the democrats provided these people. She was the DNC Chair before she was fired.

It's fun to watch the liberal mindset in action.... it was not 6 months ago all the Warren, Schumer, Pelosi, and the "cry wolf" media were sliming Session's reputation, calling him a Klansman, claiming he will steal the constitutional rights of the already disenfranchised Hillary voters blah blah blah.... and today Sessions like Spicer, are men of integrity. Shouldn't you be cheering that your racist is gone?

Could you point to a recent post where anyone you would call a liberal claimed Sessions is a man of integrity?

See Below NYT "a man of integrity" and he hasn't even been fired yet. Imagine what they will say about Klansman Sessions when he is gone. The democrats were always fond of House Leader Sen. Robert Byrd... and he was actually a Grand Dragon in WV.

I really wish the democrats would focus on the true hacking scandal which is the 3 Pakistani brothers who were paid $4M (taxpayer money) as IT Sys Admins for Waaserman-Schultz and her slimey coven of witches.

Do you really want to find the source of the DNC email leaks? Start with those creeps. They legally accessed the HoR Network and democrat email via her office computer for years. Well before she was fired last summer as the DNC chair.

The HRC campaign was crashing and burning because of those leaks. HRC stonewalled FBI forensics not permitting access to their "hacked" campaign computers and Deb WS is doing the same thing to FBI and Capital Police, stonewalling their criminal investigation, by not permitting access to government owned hardware.

Where does it all lead? Today, the ringleader brother was arrested by the FBI trying to flee the country back to where??? Pakistan... SuperMax or witness protection?

Seems logical to me. A lot of Trump supporters stated that they wanted Trump to run the country like he runs a business. Well, if you don't like the guy you hired to do a job, you fire him.

Except, this is the USA not a private business. These actions will impact everybody in this country one way or the other. It seems like Trump is in over his head here, and thought this whole "running the country" thing would be easier, or he would have more support for his policy ideas.

It's fun to watch the liberal mindset in action.... it was not 6 months ago all the Warren, Schumer, Pelosi, and the "cry wolf" media were sliming Session's reputation, calling him a Klansman, claiming he will steal the constitutional rights of the already disenfranchised Hillary voters blah blah blah.... and today Sessions like Spicer, are men of integrity. Shouldn't you be cheering that your racist is gone?

SOS wrote:Heads up Comrades, when in a meeting with Jared Kushner and his cell rings and he says urgent problem regrettably must leave, he's lying. But everything else he says is 100% truthful.Such as no project funding from Oligarchs. Also only reads subject of email and maybe first sentence on smartphone - that's deniability! So take that, liberal democrat progressives.

Comrade SOS...very astute observations and conclusions about how Jared Kushner uses the telephone and email to manage his day. It is criminal not to treat every email, text and voicemail with the same level of importance... that is not how we do things in the Politburo. Please make the appropriate notations in his file... and be sure to use a red pen.

Comrade, Obama no longer president. Trump won electorial college. But we know who is in charge, Putin. What does Putin have on dear leader Trump? That is dangerous question.

How to describe Trump administration in one word?

Russiagate

Comrade... so how can we miss these Obama rumpswabs if they won't go away? It is not the Chairman Donald seeking out their useless opinions, it is the fake mainstream news media that continues to vainly validate something that never happened. Most of those criminals from the former regime should have been locked up along with their media lapdogs.

I suspect the final part of that no-parking ordinance excluded Residence Inn though they weren't mentioned specifically. The the council winked and nodded their approval. How could you run a large hotel without that kind of access?

Azul_the_Cat wrote:Another one bites the dust.WASHINGTON — Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, resigned on Friday morning, telling President Trump he vehemently disagreed with the appointment of the New York financier Anthony Scaramucci as communications director.

Not even 3:00pm on a Friday.... Interesting, did not know Priebus recommended Spicer for that thankless spox job. Priebus was only there to placate the Republican establishment... I wonder if he is next on the block for the late blockbuster announcement.

JerseyCityFrankie wrote:Don't you think that the time for "Republican due diligence " was at any time over the last seven years, not right now? "Right now" is the time frame any rational person would expect to see a workable improved health care proposal being unveiled. But what we have instead is a Body of Republicans who have control of the House and Senate and the Whitehouse, who LITTERALY spent the last seven years CROWING about their desire and intention to implement a new and better alternative to the ACA, failing to show that they had made ANY attempt at Planing or crafting a working model that would replace the ACA and which they could all agree on. It's a colossal failure and should demonstrate to all Republican voters that their representatives have been lying to them for the last seven years, that they never had an alternative to the ACA. All their focus and energy was spent on obstructionism and now when it is their turn to legislate and lead, they don't know how to do it, they are completely failing to perform as lawmakers. Why did you vote for them?

I think the Republican Establishment Failure was pretty apparent to many voters. Romney, McCain, Bush? Remember what the stage looked like with 20 establishment candidates on it? It is conclusive that this battle for the future of America is between Washington DC Elites (Both parties) Term Limits is the only answer... and for grass roots left and right, getting that in place should be the priority. Look at the age of the DC "Leadership". I am willing to bet McCain knew he was sick last November when he ran for reelection.