Because some people have a sense of dignity and object to being treated like cattle.

If these hypothetical people equate RFID badges to the undignified and bovine because it might allow someone to track their movements, I can only assume they also don't work at any place that requires keycards or ID badges for entry (most are RFID-based), carry no credit cards, have no plans on ever leaving the country (passport), don't own a cell phone, do not drive a car (automated number plate recognition), only buy from an increasingly-limited number of stores who don't embed RFID tags in their products

If these hypothetical people equate RFID badges to the undignified and bovine because it might allow someone to track their movements, I can only assume they also don't work at any place that requires keycards or ID badges for entry (most are RFID-based), carry no credit cards, have no plans on ever leaving the country (passport), don't own a cell phone, do not drive a car (automated number plate recognition), only buy from an increasingly-limited number of stores who don't embed RFID tags in their products

Yup. The accounting scheme by which schools are funded. It's not based on the number of students attending a school, but the number of seat hours. RFID offers a better way of tracking students while they're on campus, which in turn increases the number of seat hours while holding down the costs of keeping detailed attendance records. It actually has absolutely nothing to do with tracking students. You know those little ID batches you have to wear to work (office workers everywhere know this)? Same technology. Adults do it all the time, and nobody complains about how MegaCorp Inc is watching where they're going once they're off work because they're carrying an RFID card. Your credit card probably has an RFID too. Your cell phone may even have one. The crap you buy at the superstore... yup, there too.

As adults we're using those badges to get into and out of the buildings, and to watch for non-employees from sneaking in and stealing secrets. Currently all the ones I've used do not have RFID, someone asks to see your badge and you show it without having it automatically scanned (most places anyway). But with these RFID badges in schools they are capable of tracking the students movements, knowing where they go and when, and the primary purpose of the badges is monitoring.

RFID offers a better way of tracking students while they're on campus, which in turn increases the number of seat hours while holding down the costs of keeping detailed attendance records.

If anything, this strikes me as a benefit. All the teacher then has to do is a head count, I guess. Assuming that children and teachers don't conspire to arrange for a perfect attendance, discrepancies should catch either side gaming the measurement.

Except that most ID badges aren't being used to track where I am at the office. They aren't being used to see if I'm there at work, they're being used to let me into the building, more of a virtual key. There's a HUGE difference between an electronic key and being treated like cattle.

They aren't really being used to track the kids either. They "can" and that's enough to set off lots of people. I have to swipe in and out of multiple doors at work. Maybe they don't track me, but it would be trivial for them to do so. I've worked other places where bored executives do track people. They want to see when people get to work and how long they stay. Much like most companies don't read everyone's email, but the capabilities are there, and some people do. I know I have, though only under

Sure, but you can't really "opt-out" of a public school as a kid. If you have the cash you can go to a private school or if your parents don't work you can be home-schooled, but those are small exceptions. And if the student believes the RFID tags are invading their privacy and the parents don't want to fight it, they are stuck there.

On the other hand, if I think that RFID is invading my privacy at work, I can quit and go to one of the many jobs that don't use RFID. A student doesn't have that luxury.

They aren't really being used to track the kids either. They "can" and that's enough to set off lots of people

Unfortunately "can" translates to "will" given enough time, we've seen that time and again whether it's forcing kids to take off shirts with religious messages (which has happened) or whether it's this. Employers don't track employees because they won't stand for it. But if we train them to accept it as kids, they sure will. This is the first stage of acceptance training. Remember, our grade school system was not designed to maximize learning. It was designed to produce obedient factory workers and soldiers

As someone who's admin'd a smart card based access system, I can tell you that I know exactly when you got into the building, when you went for coffee, which route you take through the building and how long you take walking it... I can even tell you if you prefer to take a dump in the morning or afternoon just by which doors you use and when you return through them.

Just because all that you see is "My card lets me through this door, but not through that door" doesn't mean that is the only functionality ava

Not only that but public schools are basically educational veal farms.

You lock the kids into certain rooms during the day, don't let them leave and test them periodically to see if they average out to make the grade like cattle. Schools get more money for meeting average and having kids pass tests, but all the kids learn is how to pass the test not learn how to think.

The best part is for the last 30 years schools on average lose money, have funding cut etc. Then we wonder why they struggle. sports, band,

You know those little ID batches you have to wear to work (office workers everywhere know this)? Same technology. Adults do it all the time, and nobody complains about how MegaCorp Inc is watching where they're going once they're off work because they're carrying an RFID card.

That's because Adults get to decide where they work, and if they're worried about carrying 'the mark of the Beast' or whatever religious belief, then they can choose to quit and work elsewhere. It's true the kids could quit school too, but it's not nearly as easy because of zoning and their parents might not be able to home school them, and the schooling is mandatory so they can't just protest by not attending.

Not that I'm saying it's rational thinking, just explaining since you don't seem to understan

You know those little ID batches you have to wear to work (office workers everywhere know this)? Same technology. Adults do it all the time, and nobody complains about how MegaCorp Inc is watching where they're going once they're off work because they're carrying an RFID card.

Nope, don't have one of those.

Your credit card probably has an RFID too.

Nope.

Your cell phone may even have one.

Well, sort of, they have to communicate with towers. Cell phones have RFID built in by definition, thats how they work.

The crap you buy at the superstore... yup, there too.

Aaand nope. Some of the newer ones, maybe, and expensive product is generally tagged with a badge that sets off the exit alarms, but it gets removed/disabled after you walk out, and it doesn't track the movement through the store (that stuff is far more expensive than most megamarts are willing to spring for). Besides, I'm not exactly going to complain ov

Follow the funding. A blob of plastic over a chip, been sold to one area today. Then the county, state. Once a few big states have it- nation wide.
This will ensure a generation thinks they are tracked everyday.
Recall what the 'free' laptops with webcams did in US schools?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robbins_v._Lower_Merion_School_District [wikipedia.org] ie the... "seeing him eating the candy in a webcam image"

Just wait until this guy finds out what teenagers do with the ones their parents paid for. In other news, sometimes people drink and drive. The solution is therefore to ban cars. Sometimes people shoot other people. Solution? Ban guns. And sometimes, very rarely, people on the internet say stupid things. Obviously... we need to ban the internet too. Or perhaps we should just accept that sometimes people do stupid things, and rather than punish everybody, we just punish the stupid people. Unless of course children are involved, in which case, feel free to go bat shiat crazy. It's the popular thing to do right now. I'm looking at you, Obama.

Yes. Being tracked violates people's privacy. I know that things like privacy are outdated concepts, especially compared to the interests of business, but some of US still feel it is a fight worth fighting.

The more information you give to third parties about you the more control you give up over your live. The less the government and companies can know about you the better.

I mean, it's not like the kids have to be implanted with the badges. You can easily leave the badge somewhere if you want to go somewhere naughty. Is there something I've missed?

RFID tags can be read over large distances with proper equipment. This data can then be used by anyone including pedo stalkers and family members with restraining orders against them to wholesale spy on the movements of students.

It could also be used to trigger hidden explosives or other harmful devices when the right people are present.

Since there is no assured association between badge holder and the student due to lack of implantation it would increase the chance of teacher laziness in dealing with atte

That is how US laws are designed. The average lawful citizen commits three felonies a day. It is simply impossible to live without breaking any law. Your only protection is the lack of evidence about most of them. Make available more information about you and basically the government can put you to jail at its discretion.

There were several books that talked about that, not a single one. And even if they are all statistically wrong (or even didn't make any statistical analysis) you just need to glimpse the Federal Law Code to understand that it is simply impossible to follow all the laws. I leave you with an interesting video on the subject:

Three FELONIES a day? Most people commit two misdemeanors a day, one is a traffic violation the other is jaywalking or littering. Felonies are fairly serious crimes and music downloading is a felony perhaps, the crime is still young in legal terms, we could change./. is just getting stupider every day.

You wear an RFID badge if you work in a high-tech firm. You wear an RFID badge if you work in a high-security building. You wear an RFID badge in numerous situations that employ lawyers, engineers, and various other professionals. Why is this an issue? Oh that's right, it is/. and any of normal monitoring and security is an infringement of their constitutional right to be a belligerent dick.

Side note: Yes, schools can do this. Is it right or wrong? Really depends on how they use it but it is how you

I've spent my working life in high-tech firms and have managed to somehow avoid this. Furthermore, those function as ACCESS CONTROLS. They are keys. They aren't intended for Big Brother spying nonsense.

Even if the tech were the same (which it isn't), the intent is quite different.

Corporate beaurocrats have better things to do with their time and money (fortunately).

Well, where my mate works, the access swipes are timestamped, registered, and stored. Access to the logs are restricted, but in HR related cases, they can look at when you came in, and where you walked.

If some asshole is going to hold me accountable for the location of their brat, then I've going to stick an RFID on the brat. And those assholes hold me accountable for their brat until that brat enters the front door of their house.

One need not be a religious nut to see the danger in indoctrinating children to accept this level of location tracking, even if it is only within the confines of a school, it still opens the door to more by creating a generation of individual's who are less averse to privacy invasion due to familiarity.

I am also open to the notion that the only way we will better understand human activity is to study it.

If you want to do social studies then get consent from randomly selected citizens. A curiosity to study human nature in no way entitles anyone to track people *who cannot refuse to be tracked due to a massive power imbalance* (eg. pupils). To want to track people aligns with totalitarian and fascist impulses. The student in question was completely right to refuse to be tracked, and anyone who opposes it is completely wrong and against the freedoms in the spirit of the US Constitution. The fact that anyone would seek to justify such tracking beggars belief.

We've actually run a couple of experiments tracking building use and interaction by using badges that report their position to observe people in the building. In both cases, wearing the badges was entirely opt-in (and required signing a form saying you understood exactly what data would be collected), and even then the ethics committee imposed some restrictions on the data that could be collected and how it had to be anonymised. It amazes me that a deployed system would have far weaker privacy constraints

While I feel a knee-jerk reaction against such privacy invasion myself, I am also open to the notion that the only way we will better understand human activity is to study it. As the schools aren't open about any such goal, and probably don't even have one I suppose we can discount it in this case. Data on human activity is of immense worth however, and to stand in the way of harvesting it for no rational reason is akin to religious nuttery.

To elaborate on the point the other replier made, human research in the developed world generally is based on the informed and voluntary consent of the subjects of the research.

As for the dangers of indoctrinating children.

One need only look at student loans in the US. There's a huge disaster brewing there from millions of college students borrowing large amounts (on usurious terms, creating unique debt that cannot be discharged or ameliorated in a bankruptcy proceeding) for the risky process of obtaining a credential with dubious value, the college di

The large Texas schools have a 1 to 1 program (all kids have laptops). If they are not able to trace an object a kid wouldn't leave laying around why would they think they could trace something a kid would ditch first chance they get?

I love how/. rightfully rails against the erosion of rights that occurred as a result of the decision in Andrea Hernandez' case, but then the first comments here are almost all attacking the bill's intent and the representative as being a religious nut from Texas. Whether that's true or not (I don't know this representative, so I couldn't say, nor have I read the article or bills) is irrelevant.

Religion doesn't always have to be against what the/. groupthink believes is right. In this case, religious nuts may be off-base, but they came to the right conclusion regardless. Even if their math doesn't add up correctly, we can all agree that it's the right solution.

*said by a deeply religious person who thinks the religious nuts in this whole mess really are nuts*

RFID tags in school IDs isn't an erosion of rights unless you're a crackpot. These same students will have RFID tags in their driver's license when they're old enough to drive and if their state has enhanced ID systems.

Can you explain to me how an RFID tag is any more of a violation of your right to privacy than being constantly filmed/taped in public? Because courts have already ruled for quite a while that you have no expectation of privacy in public (as you shouldn't). You may not agree, but I fall on the side that "If you're in public, it's public". I say that now, and I say that under the assumption that in the future everything I do in public will be recorded by hundreds of different sensors, devices, and cameras.

Simple. Camera information will be used when something happens at some public place and people go there looking for the registers. You can't single the films/tapes of a given person. It is much less invasive than a RFID that can trace all your movements and position in a given environment, and bring information like:

- Mr Anderson was alone with Miss Smith at the same physical spot for 30 min in the corridor, this morning.

No, not all of it is available on video today. There are not cameras everywhere, especially in bathrooms. Even in the corridor example it would be a simple matter to avoid a camera.

And even the information were the same, it makes all the difference in the world how easy is to index it. I would challenge you to find all the video records made by city cameras that contain Jane Doe in the last month. Good luck with that. Even with high end image recognition algorithms you will be hard pressed to get even a

Video is much much more invasive if you know who you are tracking before you start. RFID is easier to pull up months of data to track, but, having been RFID tracked at lots of different companies over the last 10+ years (in some cases, I was in IT running the tracking), RFID is mostly useless for anything more than when someone got in and when they left. Which is no more than what they want from the students.

If you don't think that facial recognition software couple with (lots of ) HD video cameras can't do exactly the same as an RFID chip you are simply smoking something illegal (except maybe in Seattle and Denver sort of.) Just more expensive.

More seriously though, the sort of RFID being used in the Andrea Hernandez case had all sorts of issues that don't apply to videotaping in public. For instance, that type of RFID (battery powered, active RFID) could be read from rather large distances, meaning that it would be trivial to check and see if someone was at home or at a particular place (think wardriving [wikipedia.org], but looking for a lack of RFID rather than looking for a presence of WiFi

Well there we go, only a "crackpot" would object to being tagged and tracked like cattle. I tell you what, since you say there is nothing wrong with it, why don't you let me tag and track you, your wife and kids? Oh you don't like that, what's the matter, are you some sort of crackpot?

So yeah, get with the times gramps. "OH NOES! Devices on us can track us when they encounter an RFID reader within a few feet of our person!" Going to get rid of your cellphone? The same one that has its location based on cell tower triangulation recorded constantly and the data is provided to law enforcement without a warrant?

The more devices like this you have attached to you the less likely you will get any privacy. The fact that some exist, and some are even mandatory, does not make it acceptable to impose more. Actually even those mandatory ones, like passports, are abusive in my view.

If you opt for being tracked it is your choice, but nobody should be forced to accept it.

In the case of debit cards, thats in the event of the card being stolen, and you reporting it in a timely manner.

We arent talking about the card being stolen. We are talking about the cards information being copied and abused, and in the case of a debit card, the cards information are the keys to your checking account. Thats not a debit transaction that took all your money.

My Platinum American Express was possibly skimmed when I flew from Chicago to Amsterdam a month ago; someone tried to use the information (not the card, the information) on Amazon, as well as at a hotel in Columbia. American Express immediately locked the card down, overnighted me a new card at no cost to myself, and told me I wasn't liable for any transactions I didn't make).

After your comment, I checked with my bank (PNC); they said I'm not liable *whatsoever* for any charges I did not make, whether the c

I'll repeat: you do realize that citing more examples of ways that our right to privacy is already being infringed or violated is not exactly a great way to make your point, right?

Just because cell phones can track us does not mean that it's acceptable for them to be doing so. Just because one abuse has occurred does not mean we must tolerate more. Just because you're okay with sacrificing a right you don't exercise does not mean that others of us who also don't exercise it feel that the right should be sac

Because it doesn't matter if you have the best idea in the world, if you believe in God, your idea needs to be ridiculed and shot down. Remember, you should judge people based on their religion, not on their actions.

In this case though it matters. This bill was put forth last time in the 82 session and failed. The main purpose of the 82nd session was to defund public schools, create charters that funnel taxpayer money to religious groups, and limit the health care of teens.

The republican platform in texas is explicitly against the teaching of critical thinking. This is problem solving. How can we have a geek culture without problem solving. When we are talking about the religious nuts trying to destroy america,

RFID can have its place in schools, for young kids I think it's a great idea, for teens not so much. However another interesting point is that RFID tags could introduce a new level of security in schools. If you have 200 kids and teachers all armed with RFID tags then you can simply lock the doors for the day and not let anyone else in, why is this a good idea? Simple school shooters, they can't get in the school so potentially you create a safer environment. Another great feature is being able to detect if your kids is skipping school or not! No more attendance and calls home.

Now as for people who have privacy issues with it, I can understand where your coming from however when you want to argue it DO NOT QUOTE RELIGION! The entire issue I have with Andrea is that she tried to being her faith as a reason to not wear a badge. You can't use this kind of argument, if you allow it then you must allow EVERY SINGLE religion based argument with no issue. I could just as easily state that my religion states I must bring semi automatic guns into the classroom and as soon as I say that you have to allow it! Or I could say something like I don't allow people of color in the classroom, then you need to make accommodations. Hence why I think when you fall back to religion as an argument you don't make a good case.

If your arguments however are focused on privacy and personal space and all of that then you have a case to fight and I'll stand behind you. Pick logic over god and I'll stand there and agree with you, pick god over logic and your out before you start. If RFID can be brought into the classroom with out invading the privacy of students and without being used as a means to an end of targeted advertising then it's a good idea!

Another great feature is being able to detect if your kids is skipping school or not!

Ignoring the privacy issues, what is it that makes you think that 200 RFID tags on school premises equals 200 kids? All that tells you is that there is 1 or more kids in school and these kids are carrying around 200 RFID tags.

Oh, the school shooter can't get in the school? Hahahahahahaha! The last one just shot out the (glass) door. Got windows in the place? He'll come in thru a window, maybe shooting it out. Put bars on the windows? There's "Murphy's Laws of Combat" that states, "Make it tough for the enemy to get in and... you can't get out!" That's like in a fire, or some terrorist poison gas attack, or whatever. And besides, do you want your school to look like a prison? Yeah, how about some 20 ft. high chain link w

My nutty religion is better than your new nutty religion! You can claim to believe in the flying spaghetti monster for all I care. It's all the same nonsense. I don't see why people should be able to get around rules just because they state that it's against their religion.

(b) I have two teenage kids. Their generation is growing up thinking that it's some kind of crime to walk home from school and kick pinecones instead of getting driven straight to soccer practice and then SAT prep.

I think they're forgetting the first fact, which is this is so falsifiable, it's comical. One badge on your shirt, the other in your pocket. Tada, you and your friend attended class. It's idiotic and a complete joke of a system.

Okay, you can all go back to ethics and morals now, lol.

By the way, the political bill-namers could have a field day with this one! Anti-children as livestock bill. Anti-child tracking bill. Kid-tagging bill. Pretty much any title sounds bad, let alone if they try to do it on purpose.

Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children? Why, the RFID system will be able to detect when unauthorized people are on school grounds. All we have to do is get the unauthorized people to wear a badge that has been programmed to say that they are unauthorized.

When Slashdot, once a bastion of personal liberties, has about a 50/50 representation of people that are FOR this egregious erosion of freedom, and those that are not.

1. Do you know the backgrounds of all people that will have access to the system?2. Do you have the source code to the management system to ensure it is secure?3. Do you know for a fact that the tech isn't susceptible to a man-in-the-middle attack?4. SCOTUS already ruled that GPS tracking should require a warrant, so our kids deserve less?

If you can answer no to any of the above, and still support this erosion of civil liberties, than I suppose it is time I actually purchase a firearm. If you want to "track" my child, let's see how well you can track your own internal organs once I am done with you. You people are sick.

The Federal and State Government's are not God. Science is not God. Stop assuming they know what's best for me, and what's best for you. Stop assuming they will always have society's best interests in mind. They have both been wrong numerous times, and will continue to get things wrong as long as a human being is involved. REGARDLESS if you believe in God or not. Putting things in charge of your life, as well as others, is turning them into a diety, and takes a special kind of stupid to assume that it is "the right thing to do".

bastion (bschn, -t-n)n.1. A projecting part of a fortification.2. A well-fortified position.3. One that is considered similar to a defensive stronghold: You are a bastion of strength. See Synonyms at bulwark. ------------(this here, see here for meaning)

are these school officials going to be allowed to go in trying to control every movement and thought that a student might possibly have or make? And how much money are the taxpayers going to have to provide in order to pay for this draconian, futuristic BS?

We didn't have this nonsense when I went to school and nobody died. Yeah, some guys got away with smoking in the boys room. BFD. This is spending money just to be spending money, I think. Its a "just say no" situation.

Whatever method they use, I personally don't have a problem with a school keeping track of attendance in an automated way

The problem with this statement is you're stating that you don't mind them doing it to the kids of other parents. You're "consenting" on their behalf for something done to them. That's about as meaningful as saying "I consent to slavery because I'm not black". It's one thing to consent to your own kids being tracked, but I think the school should at least have to get permission from every parent, and not track those who do not give permission. Actually, I'm not even sure that goes far enough; kids do have some rights that are outside the domain of parental consent.

Part of the condition was her carrying the badge around anyway (no battery) and never talking about or objecting to the program.

That's hardly a very friendly concession -- they were willing to make an exception for her if she fully pretends to support the program and never voices any objections again. Why should she be required to pretend that this system is acceptable just so that an exception is made for her??

They didn't explicitly ask for consent for them to track my children with "roll call". Someone could get the roll and know where the children are, so where's my explicit opt-in for that fascist "roll-call"?

They didn't explicitly ask for consent for them to track my children with "roll call". Someone could get the roll and know where the children are, so where's my explicit opt-in for that fascist "roll-call"?

What are you babbling on about. Attendance != electronic tracking. I suppose you're one of those morans who sees no difference between automated face scanners at football games and stationing cops by the entrance. Willfully ignoring the fact that you'd be out of a cop's short term memory in about 3 sec

If you RFID tag your pet in the US, that tag will likely be unreadable outside the US. There are multiple competing standards, and the US, like usual, picks an incompatible standard. RFID has many definitions, I would think that "passively powered radio" is one of the more common definitions. A number of them aren't even radio. A few work like airport metal detectors. Induce a magnetic field, and measure the response. That magnetic induction and reading can be c

I have had a job where you had to have such a badge, but then when I left it at home occasionally and then eventually lost it I still didn't have any trouble getting in. Luckily, as an employee I have the option of quitting and going to another company that doesn't require me to wear a badge. I currently don't have to wear a badge where I work.

How many of you folks that think this is a big deal have turned down a job because they had to wear a badge on company property?

How many job will track your movement using that badge (instead of using it to buzz into secure doors)?

Even if this isn't part of the mandate now, having the student bathrooms monitored by RFID tracker is a no-brainer -- any students who spends more than X minutes in the bathroom is possibly smoking (or is sick). Feature creep will come and out of most noble (official) intentions.