At the conclusion of Barack Obama’s second term, our nation is consumed with poisonous racial discourse. Call it “identity politics,” call it being “woke,” or just call it historical ignorance, it’s the habit of ascribing guilt and moral authority on the basis of race alone. It’s the essence of tribalism. In this world, white Americans are inherently suspect, black Americans are inherently credible, and the pathway to true white “allyship” is by apologizing for sins you did not and do not commit. This is not the world that Martin Luther King Jr. sought to create.

Writing at USA Today, minister and lawyer Oliver Thomas declares that “whites killed MLK” and recites the now-standard indictment of American society. Our nation was achieved “through three centuries of kidnapping, torture, murder, and rape. Broken teeth, broken bones, and broken spirits.” Again and again, as he reflects on American history, he says “whites” did that — that “we,” he and his white readers, are responsible. And what is the proper white response now? How should whites bridge the chasm that “we” created? We could “perform the first and more fundamental act of love. We could listen.”

Advertisement

And if some people denigrate whites as a group, others valorize African Americans. Last Friday, The Nation’s Joan Walsh gained some attention for tweeting this:

What do left-wing skeptics of Putin allegations make of fact that the most outspoken leaders believing it are black congress members?

Writing in The Nation, she amplified her point and attempted to refute progressives such as David Axelrod who were cautioning Democrats against arguing that Trump was illegitimate:

So I’m going to go with [John] Lewis, [Barbara] Lee, and [Maxine] Waters over David Axelrod on this one. I don’t want to bring race into anything where it doesn’t matter, but I did happen to notice all three leaders are African-American. Maybe that’s a coincidence. Or maybe it means that people who’ve seen the worst of American injustice are trying to warn the rest of us when it’s coming for us again.

This is bizarre. Being black or experiencing racism doesn’t make one better equipped to determine whether specific Trump officials met with Russian intelligence agents in Europe. It doesn’t enable a person to better understand whether Russian propaganda efforts made a decisive difference in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

If Martin Luther King Day is to be a time to reflect on the man, his legacy, and the great and broad question of civil rights in America, then it’s time to drop — once and for all — the notion of guilt or innocence, vice or virtue, presumed from the color of one’s skin.

Advertisement

No, “whites” didn’t kill Martin Luther King any more than “whites” commanded the 20th Maine at Gettysburg. “Whites” weren’t responsible for the Dred Scott decision any more than “whites” were responsible for Brown v. Board of Education, or for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Individual men did those things, and that means that individual men were responsible for their own responses to the challenges of their times.

For white Americans, Martin Luther King Day should be both challenging and inspiring. It is always challenging to be reminded of the evil that men can do, including sometimes the evil of our own ancestors. Yet on examining the broad sweep of history, it’s apparent that white people hardly have a monopoly on evil. Just ask the estimated 20 million Africans kidnapped and captured by other Africans for sale in the slave trade. Just ask the Nigerians who protested its abolition. One of the horrifying facts of slavery is that it was for centuries a cooperative white and black enterprise. One of the exhilarating facts of first abolition and then civil rights was that it was and is a cooperative white and black enterprise.

What we can say is that at a particular time in history, a Christian pastor made a Christian argument that ultimately resonated within American hearts.

It’s a sad reality that race relations are now worse after the two terms of our nation’s first black president. We have white Americans who feel wracked with guilt for actions they don’t take and for racism they don’t possess. Other white Americans are tired of being called racist and privileged when they do their best to be fair to everybody and struggle mightily to put food on their table and keep their own families intact. Sadly, however, the constant cries of racism can blind them to those instances where it truly exists. Then, lurking, are the real racists, like the members of the alt-right who put themselves front and center in the 2016 election and love to inflict pain and misery on their fellow man.

Advertisement

Into this mess steps the moral clarity of King himself. What is so bracing about King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail is that he gives no man or woman the comfort or condemnation of an identity. He calls out the “white moderate” who urges patience and passivity in the face of persistent injustice. He also warns against the “black nationalist” who has “lost faith in America” and “repudiated Christianity.” His message wasn’t “my people” versus “your people” but instead right versus wrong — justice versus injustice. He makes arguments. He expects action. He longs ultimately not for tribalism but for brotherhood.

On MLK Day, you honor the man himself. You honor his best arguments and his wisest words. You honor the black men and women who stood beside him. But you can also honor the white men and women who played their indispensable roles — men like Joshua Chamberlain at Little Round Top or, a century later, Michael Schwerner at Meridian, Miss. MLK Day is a reminder that the escape from tribalism and white supremacy is a multi-racial enterprise, and its greatest leaders have recognized the enduring power of individual responsibility, not collective guilt.

Had he lived, what would Martin Luther King would have thought of modern identity politics, of the world of “microaggressions” and Black Lives Matter? No one can say. Perhaps he’d be as partisan as John Lewis. Perhaps not. What we can say is that at a particular time in history, a Christian pastor made a Christian argument that ultimately resonated within American hearts.

When it comes to history, there is no “we.” “We” weren’t there. Instead, history teaches us lessons, and history has given us consequences. We seek to learn the lessons and ameliorate the worst consequences. One lesson is that every person of every race bears the burden of moral responsibility. A consequence of our fraught racial history is that we’re often blind to that key lesson. King was not, and that’s why his voice and his arguments indict us still today.

Most Popular

One of the chief criticisms of affirmative action is that it devalues credentials that minorities could otherwise use to distinguish themselves. If college admissions were purely merit-based, employers would have no reason to discount an impressive degree just because it is held by a black or Hispanic applicant. ...
Read More

Following International Women's Day 2018, a host of policies have been promoted as ways to advance women's careers. CNBC, for example, has run a story arguing that policies such as parental leave for both parents can raise women’s incomes. In the Huffington Post we can read that adopting the welfare policies of ...
Read More

One of the silly notions loose in America is that there is some virtue in buying local -- preferring sellers simply because they're located in "your area" (city, county, state, country) over those located elsewhere. In other words, geographical discrimination is, supposedly, good.
Governments and governmental ...
Read More

Jeff Roe, who managed Senator Ted Cruz’s presidential campaign in 2016, has a message for Republican congressional candidates: Don’t run from Trump this year. Instead they should “[f]ix bayonets and charge the hill.” What exactly does this mean? It’s not that they should “support the president’s ...
Read More

A Washington, D.C., city councilman has issued an apology for suggesting that a cabal of Jewish financiers manipulates weather patterns to exercise control over urban areas.
Trayon White (D., Ward 8) posted a Facebook video Friday during a brief snowfall in which he complained about the weather and argued ...
Read More

As detailed in my column over the weekend about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s flouting of Justice Department standards, there are significant differences between the two-count criminal information to which Mueller permitted Richard Gates to plead guilty and both (a) the original 12-count District of Columbia ...
Read More

The use of assassination raises two difficult sets of questions.
First: Is it effective? Can the elimination of an individual significantly change the course of history? Make the world a safer place? Save the lives of other human beings?
Second: Is it morally and legally justified? Is it ethically and ...
Read More

An unforced error from a Vatican communications office the other day drove me a little something like crazy. The nature of the unforced error is that it is wholly unnecessary and typically distracting. And so it was.
Days before, as the fifth anniversary of Pope Francis’s election as pope was approaching, a ...
Read More