Eagle Forum: Government Is Constitutionally Required To Fight 'Homosexual Conduct'

Submitted by Miranda Blue on Tuesday, 7/22/2014 11:41 am

Eagle Forum’s Virginia Armstrong, the head of the group’s Court Watch Project, today makes the novel argument that the U.S. Constitution doesn’t protect the rights of LGBT people but in fact requires the government to fight “homosexual conduct” in “every legitimate way possible.”

In an article published on Eagle Forum’s website, Armstrong argues that advances in LGBT equality prove “that America is indeed in the ‘danger zone’ and is in dire need of a massive ‘straightening up process.’”

She then argues that the AIDS epidemic shows that “homosexual conduct is what is harmful to gays and lesbians to the degree that governments are not only constitutionally allowed, but constitutionally required, to fight such conduct in every legitimate way possible.”

All emphasis is Armstrong’s:

HasAmerica bent over so far backwards in our spiritual, moral, and constitutional life that we are in danger of “breaking”? This question is central to our current series of Court Watch Briefings. The question has been precipitated by America’s Culture War and echoes the anguished cry of the Father in the famous musical production, “Fiddler on the Roof,” who felt that revolutionary changes in his world were pushing him to the “breaking point.”

We are proving that America is indeed in the “danger zone” and is in dire need of a massive “straightening up process.” Nothing more clearly demonstrates this fact than the recentsame-sex marriage decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court -Perry v. HollingsworthandWindsor v. U.S.

…

These statistics bring into bolder relief than ever the fatal flaws of Perry/Windsor. HIV and AIDS is a pandemic , far worse than other such health threats which have sent governments and media around the world into a veritable apoplexy, accompanied by demands for the most severe action possible to stem those threats. Yet, federal (and, now, state) judges are demanding constitutional protections for the conduct which is most responsible for the HIV/AIDS pandemic. Furthermore, Judge Vaughn Walker’s “Finding of Fact” that religious opposition to homosexual conduct “harms gays and lesbians” and is constitutionally protected is so incongruent with reality as to be laughable, if it were possible to laugh about such an adjudicative disaster. The reality, of course, is that the exact opposite is true –homosexual conduct is what is harmful to gays and lesbiansto the degree that governments are not only constitutionallyallowed, but constitutionallyrequired, to fight such conduct in every legitimate way possible.This example alone illustrates how upside down is Walker’s blast that “harm to homosexuals” results from religious opposition. This falsehood convertsa particularly pernicious value judgment into an adjudicative fact given great weight in pro-homosexual court decisions.One of the worst blows to reason, morality, and the Judeo-Christian worldview is the speed with which thePerry/Windsorpoison has poured through America’s legal veins…