US 31 over PINE CREEK

Map

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:

US 31 over PINE CREEK

Structure number:

005074

Old structure number:

000000030100240 (from 1992 edition)

Location:

2.0 MI S OF PRATTVILLE

Purpose:

Carries highway over waterway

Route classification:

Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]

Length of largest span:

12.1 ft. [3.7 m]

Total length:

39.0 ft. [11.9 m]

Skew angle:

20°

Owner:

State Highway Agency [01]

Year built:

1955

Historic significance:

Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]

Design load:

MS 18 / HS 20 [5]

Number of main spans:

3

Main spans material:

Concrete continuous [2]

Main spans design:

Culvert [19]

Deck type:

Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:

Fair

Status:

Open, no restriction [A]

Average daily traffic:

10,640 [as of 2013]

Truck traffic:

7% of total traffic

Structural appraisal:

Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]

Water adequacy appraisal:

Superior to present desirable criteria [9]

Roadway alignment appraisal:

Better than present minimum criteria [7]

Channel protection:

Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]

Culvert condition:

Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5]

Scour condition:

Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]

Operating rating:

97.8 tons [88.9 metric tons]

Inventory rating:

97.8 tons [88.9 metric tons]

Sufficiency rating:

64.7

Recommended work:

Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]