The pending nomination of Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., to be secretary of State has prompted a bipartisan movement on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to push President Obama to nominate an inspector general for the State Department.

That position has been vacant since Howard Krongard left in 2007, and the leadership at the IG’s office has been in the hands of Deputy Inspector General Harold Geisel.

“During your entire first term as president, you did not nominate anyone to serve in this critical position,” read a letter to Obama dated Jan. 24. “This failure evidences a clear disregard for the Inspector General Act and the will of Congress.” The letter notes that the vacancy at State is the longest of “any of the 73 inspector general positions across the government.”

It was signed by Reps. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the panel’s chairman; Elijah Cummings, D-Md., its ranking member; Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, chairman of the panel’s National Security Subcommittee; and John Tierney, D-Mass., ranking member of that subcommittee.

“In the context of the upcoming confirmation hearings for Sen. John Kerry as your nominee to become the next secretary of State, we are sure that the question of who you plan to nominate to serve as inspector general for the State Department will be a top priority for members of Congress on both sides of the aisle,” the lawmakers said.

The oversight panel held a hearing on May 10, 2012, highlighting the problems unfilled IG positions cause for agencies and overseers.

Jake Wiens, an investigator for the nonprofit Project on Government Oversight, which has a website page tracking vacant IG positions, testified, “POGO firmly believes that the effectiveness of an IG office can be diminished when that office does not have permanent leadership, especially when that vacancy exists for an extended period of time, as many of the current vacancies have. But we also acknowledge that IG vacancies can begin and continue for a variety reasons, some of which are problematic and some of which are completely appropriate. It is important to note that the negative aspects of an IG vacancy must be balanced against the need to identify highly qualified candidates and to vet those candidates thoroughly, a process which can -- and should -- take time.”

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or
otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and
has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems
to be in violation of this rule.

Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.