Monday, October 31, 2016

I've been wondering why Democrats fail to speak out against Hillary's corruption and lying. The Republicans certainly don't have a problem attacking Trump and descending into a civil-war.

Good to observe that the Washington Times finally wrote an article on this concern. When will Democrats denounce Hillary? Other newspapers, such as the Washington Post, seem to dismiss Hillary's corruption, incompetence, and lying as a nonissue.

My perspective is that the Democrats won't denounce Hillary because their mindset is stuck in
the feudal ages. They owe their uncompromising fealty to the Democratic
party. Supporting the party takes a precedence over everything, such as being ethical or working in benefit of the national interest. In short, the means justify the end for the Democrats. Hillary is the current Democratic feudal "Queen". As such she deserves total devotion by the Democrats no matter what her character flaws are or how great her incompetence.

This mindless
devotion approaches unbelievable psychotic behavior by Democrats. I can just imagine all
Democrats, like lemmings, gladly racing to jump off a cliff to their deaths in
mindless impassioned devotion to Hillary.

-----------------------

Since posting there has been some breaking news. Longtime Clinton Ally Stuns Fox News Host, Withdraws Support of Hillary on Live Television. Doug Schoen, the long time supporter of Hillary withdrew his support of Hillary. I have heard Doug speak many times, and he seemed like one of the few rationale Democrats. He was not a rabid partisan as most Democratic pundits seem to be. I heard it in passing and I was not sure that I heard it correctly. Guess I did. Maybe be Democratic "dam" is starting to develop cracks. Shoen's withdrawal of support for Hillary may be the first "drip" of many that will eventually develop into a "flood". Only time will tell.

Saturday, October 22, 2016

Be afraid, very afraid of Hillary Clinton's possible justice appointments to the US Supreme Court. Hillary, based on her remarks, will propose to nominate justices who will not use the Constitution as the legal standard of review for making decisions. Note, in the video below, the absence any reference to the Constitution by Hillary. What she does (falsely) claim is that the Court is supposed to "stand on the side of the American" people whatever that means. For a politician, such as Hillary, this is just disingenuous "smoke and mirrors".

The implication of Hillary's response is that she would nominate justices who would not make legal decisions based on the US Constitution. Instead, a Hillary Clinton Supreme Court would; on her subjective assertion that she desires a Court that represents "all Americans", that she will nominate justices who will simply issue decisions based on the political objectives of the Democratic party.

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

A fun filled masochistic exercises in programing is trying to figure out why an obvious piece of code fails. I had an HTML form for editing records. The form contained a checkbox for identifying whether the record is "active" or "inactive".

Pressing the submit button sends the edited data to the server, the edited data is then re-displayed on the form. Surprisingly the changes to the checkbox were not re-displayed correctly. Leaving me to wonder why.

My initial belief was that the HTML form when executed would send either a "0" or a "1" to the server since a checkbox is a boolean variable. Turned out, after much experimentation, not to be the case.

Even though the checkbox is a boolean variable it does not send the results to the server in the expected manner as either a "0" or as a "1". If "false" (the checkbox when not checked and the value is the number 0), no value is sent to the server and you get an error message ("An Error Occurred #9").

After some testing the following solution was developed. The checkbox in the form now correctly displays changes after the submit button is pressed.

The Washington Times writes: "Those supposedly spontaneous protesters disrupting events for
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump actually may be
professionals trained by operatives working with the Democratic National
Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

A yearlong undercover investigation
by the conservative group Project Veritas Action shows Democratic
strategists discussing how they hire agitators — including union
members, homeless people and the mentally ill — to incite violence by
provoking Trump supporters on camera at campaign stops."

According to the Times: "Two top Democratic strategists have exited the presidential campaign after explosive undercover videos showed them discussing voter fraud and their roles in planting paid agitators at campaign events for Republican candidate Donald Trump."

Well at this stage of the election process the resignation of any staff for bad behavior is pretty much meaningless. The damage has already been done and can't be undone by November 8, 2016, election day.

Again, any readers to this article are encouraged to do their own research on this apparent attempt to sabotage the election process by the Democratic party.

The Washington Times writes: "Those supposedly spontaneous protesters disrupting events for
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump actually may be
professionals trained by operatives working with the Democratic National
Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

A yearlong undercover investigation
by the conservative group Project Veritas Action shows Democratic
strategists discussing how they hire agitators — including union
members, homeless people and the mentally ill — to incite violence by
provoking Trump supporters on camera at campaign stops."

According to the Times: "Two top Democratic strategists have exited the presidential campaign after explosive undercover videos showed them discussing voter fraud and their roles in planting paid agitators at campaign events for Republican candidate Donald Trump."

Well at this stage of the election process the resignation of any staff for bad behavior is pretty much meaningless. The damage has already been done and can't be undone by November 8, 2016, election day.

Again, any readers to this post are encouraged to do their own research on this apparent attempt to sabotage the election process by the Democratic party.
-------------------------------------