Another Original LR Translation: Nemtsov Volume III, Part 2

EDITOR’S NOTE: This is the second installment of our series from Dave Essel translating the latest issue of the Nemtsov White Paper condemning the Putin years. The first installment ishere, and the prior issues arehere.

When “Putin – The Results”, the first edition of our report, was published back in February 2008, Putin was happily boasting about economic successes. On 8 February 2008, he addressed a sitting of the State Council. Talking about the results of his presidency, he made much of the facts that GDP had risen during it and that in 2008 alone Russia had attracted $83 billion on inward investment.

Even then, however, we warned that the economic model being constructed by Putin was just a speculative bubble that could burst at any moment. And that is precisely what happened six months after our report was published: a massive economic crisis broke in Russia in 2008, a crisis far worse than the 1998 default, one which if it is to be compared with anything, then only with the period of the collapse of the Soviet economy and the economic depression of 1992-1994.

In 2009, Russia GDP fell by 7.9%. That is a record. The 1998 default happened after a smaller fall – 5.3%. This drop is on a par with 1992-1994.

Why did the Putinomy collapse so fast? In his attempts to cover up the failures of his economic policies, Putin tried to put all the blame for the crisis on America. But that does not help explain why the rate of decline of the Russian economy was far more severe than that of the leading Western countries or indeed of the other countries of the BRIC. Russia came out as one of the 15 countries that suffered the most from the crisis.

The explanation which is usually pushed is that in 2009 Russia was still wallowing in oil dependency, relying on its oil and gas exports and the world price of oil. There’s plenty of truth in this. But in that case, how come Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil producer, whose economy is even more dependent on oil than Russia’s, not only did not suffer a fall in GDP but actually manage a slight growth – of 0.2%?

The decline is Russia was one of the sharpest seen in the CIS. In fact, 8 of the 12 CIS actually achieved economic growth in 2009! Apart from Russia, only the Ukraine, Armenia, and Moldavia suffered declines.

Yet while the economy trends ever down, Russia retains relatively high inflation of 9% a year, while in Western Europe prices are not rising at all and in the US, Japan, and China they are actually dropping.

What sort of economic monster has Putin actually built that it can produce both deep depression and high inflation simultaneously?

All these years we’ve been forced to listen to endless empty talk of the need to “make the economy less centred on raw materials”. And what has happened? Look at the table below. Raw materials made up 44% of Russian exports in 1999. More recently they have constituted 66-69%. Exports of manufactured goods and equipment have dropped from 11% to 5%.

While Putin has been ruling the country, Russia has become even more of a raw materials appendage to the world economy than ever before.

Putin’s “economic miracle” for his second presidential term was built on the influx into Russia of short-term speculative money from abroad. This did indeed lead to the high economic growth rates of 2005-2008 when over $140 billion flowed in. But this money was mainly in the form of loans. So when the crisis started, capital poured back out of Russia and the “economic miracle” finished.

Putin’s growth model was rickety because it was not founded on investments in modernising production, increasing labour productivity, or conducive to the development of small and middle business.

Economies like this can only “rise from their knees” if they get constant injections in their joints in the form of cheap credits from the West.

Looking back we can therefore see for ourselves that the main myths of Putinite economic success were outright lies. Russia’s development rates did not stand out in any particular way from the other CIS countries. This means that the economic growth of the 2000s was more probably the result of the post-Soviet countries ridding themselves of Soviet economic ways. Growth rates in oil-rich Russia were amongst the lowest in the CIS. Back in 2000, Russia enjoyed the 2nd highest GDP growth rate in the CIS. By 2008, it was in 8th place. By 2009, we led the pack for rate of decline.

Having been granted a spectacular gift from heaven – unprecedentedly high oil prices – the Russian economy should have grown considerably faster. Export oil prices were three times as high under Putin as they had been under Yeltsin (average $47 pb in 2000-2009 and $60-90 during 2006-2009 as against $16.7pb in the 1990s).

With a windfall such as this, our economy should have shown growth of 9-15% a year, like our oil-exporting neighbours Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan.

Furthermore it is not Putin we have to thank for what economic growth we did show. All he did was hitch onto the positive trends that had appeared before he came to power. Economic growth resumed in Russia as early as 1997 and then again, after the default, in 1999, when the country GDP grew by 6.4%. Putin had nothing to do with this.

If only the last decade had been used to really modernise the country, to make long-term investments in the renovation of industry, to build roads and airports, to create a modern army and pension system… We may never again be presented with such a chance and painful changes (for example, pensions reform) will be far harder to carry out.

Structural reforms were needed in order to modernise. But everything was done back to front and inside out: assets were expropriated – from Yukos to Sakhalin-2 to Euroset while more and more was spent on paying for the growing apparatus of state, the special service, and financing the newly reformed state corporations.

Putin began the 2000s with a budget surplus and and ended the decade with a growing deficit (which in 2009 amounted to 5.9% of GDP). How to patch the holes? Putin found an answer: raise social security payments and the pensionable age. Russia also went back to borrowing abroad.

At the same time and paradoxical as this may seem, tax on the oil-and-gas sector is being reduced. In 2009, Putin offered tax breaks worth over $6 billion to the oil industry and again refused to increase tax for Gazprom, although the corporation pays considerably less in tax than do Russia’s oil companies (for more detail see our report “Putin and Gazprom”). In the deal called “Gas in Exchange for the Black Sea Fleet”, Putin released Gazprom from $4 billion a year in taxes. We citizens of this country will pay for this in higher taxes and utilities bills.

The measures claimed to have been taken by Putin in connection with the crisis are revolting in their one-sidedness. They make it perfectly clear that the banking sector and a small circle of corporations have been prioritised to receive the greater part of this aid. Instead of supporting the people, Putin has provided financial aid to oligarch O. Deripaska to the tune of $4.5 billion and another $1.8 billion to his friend R. Abramovich. Meanwhile, Rosneft friends Sechin and Bogdanovich received $4.6 billion in aid from state banks.

And we, the people of Russia, will be doing the paying to keep afloat the corrupt unreformed raw materials appendage they have built.

During the year 2006 the democrats were voted in as the majority party in the USA congress. In 2008, when it became apparent that Obama would be the next president, the market crashed. Since that time the USA economy has suffered high unemployment and depressed economic conditions. It will be the democrats and Obama that will pay the price.

The one bright spot has been the development of a new technology that provided for a massive natural gas extraction from shale gas rocks. Shale gas rock is literally everywhere.

Shale gas rock from the carboniferous period is 4,000 feet thick and there are thousands of square miles of this gas bearing rock. The world’s dependency on energy from unstable areas of the world is coming to an end.

In only a short period of four years USA was able to discontinue importing liquid natural gas (LNG) from Qatar. Soon USA will be exporting LNG over terminals already existing in Texas. The prospects for Russia, who failed to diversify their economy will be bleak,

It will not be forgotten that Putin turned off the pipeline to Europe during winter months in a dispute with the Ukraine. This arrogance will be rewarded in the very short future. Planned pipelines are already being cancelled because of an oversupply of natural gas.

The only chance Russia has is a rapid liberalization of their economy. Foreign investors must be protected and not ripped off.

The Putin crowd must stop stealing from the Russian people and begin the building of a normal country with human rights, independent judiciary and strong law enforcement. The Russian economy would immediately begin a period of strong growth.

The problem is that Putin is a megalomaniac just like Obama. They are two peas in a pod.

“During the year 2006 the democrats were voted in as the majority party in the USA congress”

Which allowed them to pass a health care package forcing all Americans to buy insurance from private for-profit corporations, a clear collusion between government and big business ala Putin/Gazprom.

“In 2008, when it became apparent that Obama would be the next president, the market crashed.”

No it crashed because of fraudulent securities transactions, bogus rating schemes, and debt bubbles all caused by the USA under Clinton/Bush due to lack of sensible securities laws the result of which allowed for unfettered and willful manipulation (destruction) of markets with Russia being one of the obvious targets of that destruction.

“Shale gas rock is literally everywhere. ”

Yes but most of all in Russia. The production costs of large quantities of shale gas long term might be greater than expected and global demand will increase long term. Gazprom will suffer short term but likely won’t put off production plans because of shale gas competition. When competition is real it benefits consumers.

“The only chance Russia has is a rapid liberalization of their economy”

Actually they could adopt a barter economy and still survive. They have rich resources, brainpower and I would guess nuclear weapons aimed at every NATO country especially the USA. Hope you got a bug-out plan if you live near a major US city because the NATO people apparently aim to destroy Russia and steal it’s resources which they now have a clear track record of doing.

“Planned pipelines are already being cancelled because of an oversupply of natural gas.”

Except the ones representing the semitic influence that try to overthrow the government and place Russian resources into the hands of American and European corporations and banks not to mention subjugating Russian high tech workers by way of software patents and other IP dominance schemes. Russia had no legal mechanism for protecting strategic resources and assets but that all changed under Putin. This is the real reason why Khodorkovsky is sitting in a jail cell and not quite dead yet.

“No it crashed because of fraudulent securities transactions, bogus rating schemes, and debt bubbles all caused by the USA under Clinton/Bush due to lack of sensible securities laws the result of which allowed for unfettered and willful manipulation (destruction) of markets with Russia being one of the obvious targets of that destruction.”
Actually, Democrats in Congress rammed a sham of a bill through which forced banks to make loans to people who were not credit worthy using ARMs via Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Bankers knowing this was garbage bundled them and sold them to investors. The US housing “bubble” is not over yet from what I’ve been hearing. The 5 year and 6 year ARMs start coming due here shortly and high-value mortgages are also being dropped. This farce was forseeable by anyone with an ounce of business management under their belt, and these jokers in Congress should be the ones footing the bill, not the American taxpaper. Russia was never on the radar scheme, sorry dude.

Any way, there more things are getting “weird” in the US, the more its beginning to look like Russia; except our little wanna be dictator is TALL (a rarity-usually dictators are short!)

NOTICE: This blog quotes from source material, and links to it. When a post contains quotes and original material, the quotes are in ordinary print and the original in boldface. See "About LR" in the title bar for copyright notice.

Supporting La Russophobe

La Russophobe does not solicit or accept financial support from any source. If you would like to show your support for LR and your opposition to the rise of dictatorship in Russia, the easiest way is to create a Digg or StumbleUpon or Delicious account and use it to favorite some of our posts. LR also welcomes your e-mail comments and submissions for publication, and we urge you to support the effort to boycott of the Sochi Olympics.