What if consciousness is not what drives the human mind?

Everyone knows what it feels like to have consciousness: it's that self-evident sense of personal awareness, which gives us a feeling of ownership and control over the thoughts, emotions and experiences that we have every day.

Most experts think that consciousness can be divided into two parts: the experience of consciousness (or personal awareness), and the contents of consciousness, which include things such as thoughts, beliefs, sensations, perceptions, intentions, memories and emotions.

It's easy to assume that these contents of consciousness are somehow chosen, caused or controlled by our personal awareness – after all, thoughts don't exist until until we think them. But in a new research paper in Frontiers of Psychology, we argue that this is a mistake.

We suggest that our personal awareness does not create, cause or choose our beliefs, feelings or perceptions. Instead, the contents of consciousness are generated "behind the scenes" by fast, efficient, non-conscious systems in our brains. All this happens without any interference from our personal awareness, which sits passively in the passenger seat while these processes occur.

If this sounds strange, consider how effortlessly we regain consciousness each morning after losing it the night before; how thoughts and emotions – welcome or otherwise – arrive already formed in our minds; how the colours and shapes we see are constructed into meaningful objects or memorable faces without any effort or input from our conscious mind.

Consider that all the neuropsychological processes responsible for moving your body or using words to form sentences take place without involving your personal awareness. We believe that the processes responsible for generating the contents of consciousness do the same.

Our thinking has been influenced by research into neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric disorders, as well as more recent cognitive neuroscience studies using hypnosis. The studies using hypnosis show that a person's mood, thoughts and perceptions can be profoundly altered by suggestion.

In such studies, participants go through a hypnosis induction procedure, to help them to enter a mentally focused and absorbed state. Then, suggestions are made to change their perceptions and experiences.

For example, in one study, researchers recorded the brain activity of participants when they raised their arm intentionally, when it was lifted by a pulley, and when it moved in response to a hypnotic suggestion that it was being lifted by a pulley.

Similar areas of the brain were active during the involuntary and the suggested "alien" movement, while brain activity for the intentional action was different. So, hypnotic suggestion can be seen as a means of communicating an idea or belief that, when accepted, has the power to alter a person's perceptions or behaviour.

The personal narrative

All this may leave one wondering where our thoughts, emotions and perceptions actually come from. We argue that the contents of consciousness are a subset of the experiences, emotions, thoughts and beliefs that are generated by non-conscious processes within our brains.

This subset takes the form of a personal narrative, which is constantly being updated. The personal narrative exists in parallel with our personal awareness, but the latter has no influence over the former.

The personal narrative is important because it provides information to be stored in your autobiographical memory (the story you tell yourself, about yourself), and gives human beings a way of communicating the things we have perceived and experienced to others.

This, in turn, allows us to generate survival strategies; for example, by learning to predict other people's behaviour. Interpersonal skills like this underpin the development of social and cultural structures, which have promoted the survival of human kind for millennia.

So, we argue that it is the ability to communicate the contents of one's personal narrative –– and not personal awareness – that gives humans their unique evolutionary advantage.

What's the point?

If the experience of consciousness does not confer any particular advantage, it's not clear what it's purpose is. But as a passive accompaniment to non-conscious processes, we don't think that the phenomena of personal awareness has a purpose, in much the same way that rainbows do not. Rainbows simply result from the reflection, refraction and dispersion of sunlight through water droplets – none of which serves any particular purpose.

Our conclusions also raise questions about the notions of free will and personal responsibility. If our personal awareness does not control the contents of the personal narrative which reflects our thoughts, feelings, emotions, actions and decisions, then perhaps we should not be held responsible for them.

In response to this, we argue that free will and personal responsibility are notions that have been constructed by society. As such, they are built into the way we see and understand ourselves as individuals, and as a species. Because of this, they are represented within the non-conscious processes that create our personal narratives, and in the way we communicate those narratives to others.

Just because consciousness has been placed in the passenger seat, does not mean we need to dispense with important everyday notions such as free will and personal responsibility. In fact, they are embedded in the workings of our non-conscious brain systems. They have a powerful purpose in society and have a deep impact on the way we understand ourselves.

Related Stories

Consciousness—the internal dialogue that seems to govern one's thoughts and actions—is far less powerful than people believe, serving as a passive conduit rather than an active force that exerts control, according to ...

We spend around six years of our lives dreaming – that's 2,190 days or 52,560 hours. Although we can be aware of the perceptions and emotions we experience in our dreams, we are not conscious in the same way as when we're ...

Emotions are not innately programmed into our brains, but, in fact, are cognitive states resulting from the gathering of information, New York University Professor Joseph LeDoux and Richard Brown, a professor at the City ...

Measuring and defining consciousness has been an ongoing challenge for neuroscientists, philosophers and psychologists for centuries. The concept of levels of consciousness is mostly theoretical, limiting the abilities of ...

Columbia scientists have identified the brain's 'aha!' moment—that flash in time when you suddenly become aware of information, such as knowing the answer to a difficult question. Today's findings in humans, combined with ...

Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been characterized as a "complete loss of self." Early on when memory begins to fade, the victim has difficulty recalling names, their grocery list or where they put their keys. As the disease ...

Recommended for you

Each day brings with it a host of decisions to be made, and each person approaches those decisions differently. A new study by University of Illinois researchers found that these individual differences are associated with ...

Ask a dozen people about their greatest fears, and you'll likely get a dozen different responses. That, along with the complexity of the human brain, makes fear—and its close cousin, anxiety—difficult to study. For this ...

It took eight long years of research, but now an international team led by neuroscientists at Université de Montréal has discovered a basic molecular mechanism that better helps understand how Lou Gehrig's disease, or amyotrophic ...

Samir Haj-Dahmane, Ph.D., senior research scientist at the University at Buffalo Research Institute on Addictions, has discovered how certain neurotransmitters are transported and reach their targets in the brain, which could ...

We all know that alcohol impairs our judgement, alertness and performance on tasks requiring attention, but the mechanism behind booze's effect on cognition still isn't well-understood. Now, a new study led by psychologists ...

5 comments

[p.1] If this were true then there would be no point in consciousness at all, what used to be thought of as a 'steam whistle', that is, something that has no effect on the functioning at all.

In reality those subconscious processes respond to sensorial information including the contents of consciousness and we do choose what we are conscious of, that is, we choose what to focus our consciousness on.

These processes alone, regardless of anything else, are more than capable of directing those subconscious processes even if consciousness is a result of those same processes.

By contrast, governments result from the votes of people but then govern the behaviour of the people who support them; the living cell achieves homoeostasis, metabolism and other general functions as a result of numerous independent chemical reactions which those said functions then govern.

[p.2] This is basic negative feedback, a process known in all living things at many levels. To think that consciousness is not part of one or more negative feedback loops is just another example of a somewhat childish arrogance that creeps into scientific discourse whereby there is an assumption that underlying processes are all that needs to be considered and the overall effect, process or structure resulting from those underlying processes can all but be ignored and certainly can not be a causative source, despite the evidence to the contrary and the accepted mechanism known as negative feedback.

The mind is the interface between the brain and the consciousness. The consciousness is the space where sensations take place. It is ground state where sensations from the mind take place. The mind or the body itself can react to injury before it becomes pain the consciousness. The mind send that signal to the to the consciousness where it become experienced a pain. It is the experience of injury as pain that shows us that we are consciousness.

If consciousness experiences pain the mind will something is wrong. As a result the mind can signal the brain to change what is causing the pain.

Anyone who's meditated regularly already knows this. The brain's various functional circuits produce data streams, some are in conflict, some are supportive of others. The resultant conscious experience is the combination of data streams that "survived" the interaction of competing & supportive impulses.

The awareness of self is nothing more than our attention placed on the data stream made up of our personal memories and values and the sensory experience (what is felt & seen, etc). This is why persons in "flow" as artists, sports-persons, etc lose themselves in the action - their attention is elsewhere. And this is why people who've experienced "enlightenment" use phrases such as "I am the glass of water I am drinking" They really aren't the glass of water but their attention is there &, being enlightened, they have rerouted their brains (through practice) away from the previously favored memories of self, & they feel they are whatever hold their attention.

Consciousness is nothing more than a learned experience. Children do not learn to be aware of themselves until around four. They are conscious about without even though they are not within before this point in their life. All living organisms are conscious. We are the only ones can express this concept among ourselves. Free will is nothing more than our reactions to stimuli in couple with our learned experiences. A case in point, Trump reacted to the word rocket and will himself from the topic to Kim. Need I say more?

Please sign in to add a comment.
Registration is free, and takes less than a minute.
Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.