Pages

Friday, January 20, 2012

Scientists are now recommending that mothers delay vital breastfeeding in order to ‘improve’ the effects of vaccinations, stating that consuming breast milk could hamper the potency of vaccinations such as the rotavirus injection.

The authors state that the immune-boosting effects of breast milk could negatively affect the vaccine potency.

Of course the authors make no mention of the relationship between vaccination and over 189 diseases as observed by peer-reviewed research.

In a study published in the Journal of Pediatric Infections & Diseases that anyone can freely read, scientists say that breastfeeding should be halted to improve vaccine effects (which include negative effects).

Perhaps most startling is the fact that children in these nations oftentimes rely on breast milk as the only source of quality nutrition, yet the recommendation states that this is a desirable effect. In fact, a weakened immune system is just what the scientists are looking for to increase the potency and ‘effectiveness’ of the vaccine.

An excerpt from the study reads:

INTERPRETATION: The lower immunogenicity and efficacy of rotavirus vaccines in poor developing countries could be explained, in part, by higher titers of IgA and neutralizing activity in breast milk consumed by their infants at the time of immunization that could effectively reduce the potency of the vaccine. Strategies to overcome this negative effect, such as delaying breast-feeding at the time of immunization, should be evaluated.

Scientists: Stop Breastfeeding, Make Way for Negative Effects

What’s more is the fact that the researchers seem to indicate mothers should instead choose to give their children synthetic formula. This is telling, as it shows that synthetic formula has nowhere near the immune-boosting capabilities of real breast milk. In fact, it can be quite damaging to the health of babies. In addition to containing toxic ingredients similar to processed foods, infant formula has been linked to a greater risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and many more illnesses.

What does this ultimately mean? It means the enhanced ‘potency’ of these vaccinations given to children who are starved of breast milk also includes the negative reactions. The same negative reactions that are well documented by published research, tying vaccinations to autoimmune disorders and to infant mortality.

Breast milk provides antibodies that fight off disease and illness....what does this tell you about the poison being injected into our babies? The first vaccine is not scheduled until 2 months of age. If a woman "delayed" breast-feeding for that amount of time, her body would no longer be lactating and producing breast milk. Add this to the scientifically unsound advice given here.

It has to be the producers of baby formula behind this....more captive one-to-two year old customers.

Colostrum is the pre-milk fluid produced by female mammals in the mammary glands just before they give birth. While it is technically not milk at all, colostrums is often called “first milk” as it is obtained in the first milking after birth.

After the first milking, the fluid begins to change into milk, containing less colostrum and more milk as time passes. This transitional period lasts 2-3 days. This fluid is referred to as transitional milk. In all other mammals other than humans, colostrum is crucial to the survival of the newborn. This is because of the high concentration of immune factors that are transferred through the colostrum.

Since the beginning of time, man has observed that newborns fare better, live longer and have fewer illnesses if they were able to obtain their mother’s first milk.

Use of Human Milk as Cancer Therapyhttp://megandoyle.suite101.com/use-of-human-milk-as-cancer-therapy-a113100

It is unclear how human milk provides relief for cancer patients, however many people believe that it is actually capable of killing cancer cells. This is supported by a study published in 1995 from Lund University in Sweden that showed that human milk could cause cultured cancer cells to undergo programmed cell death, or apoptosis.

High levels of GMO agrochemicals found in breast milkhttp://www.naturalnews.com/032135_breast_milk_herbicides.html

The pesticides and herbicides used to treat genetically-modified organisms (GMO) are showing up in significant amounts in rainwater, water wells, and even mothers' breast milk, according to new research out of Brazil.

This author doesn't know what he is talking about. Had he bothered to do his research (even briefly attempt to read the full journal article not just the abstract), he would find that no such claim has been made. And at no time did the researcher suggests formula feeding or halting breastfeeding. Merely a brief interruption for administration of the ORAL vaccine...in other words not to breastfeed right before or right after administration. This is so that antibodies in the breastmilk do not degrade the vaccine when mixed in the stomach together.

As the so called scientists have HUGE conflicts of interests and reported to take Vaccine industry funding in some previous articles they had written, it is No surprise to see the recommendation. People have to wake up to reality and the professionals who support this vaccine drive are also funded hugely by Industry ( In India I know) but I am sure its all over...I am here at WHO Executive Board where lot of good things were said by the governments and WHO in favour of new vaccines, there only worry seemed to be cost . Donor countries are also supporting the promoter of these vaccines...it is called GAVI if someone did not know. Billions of dollars are pumped into GAVI which clearly says they want to push NEW vaccines .

By the way I did not understand the picture of a bottle feeding abby on the post...it is misleading.

Mr. Guddiarci, I take issue with how you present scientists. You start the article off with "Scientists are now recommending...". This implies that all or at least the majority are saying this, which is patently untrue. These scientists in the study were obviously paid shills for Big Pharma. My husband is a scientist, a biologist, and is very much against vaccinations in children, period. He fought like crazy so that his own daughter, when only several months old, didn't have to be vaccinated and it was a huge struggle. What you have done is made all scientists look bad by the way that you worded your article. You should have said "paid shills who claim they are scientists" or some such thing. Scientists have enough of a bad rap now with all the fundies thinking the earth is 6,000 y.o. and trashing science in schools as much as they can.

Well, the author stated the study was available for all to read, so I read it.

The study uses the word "titer" which is very important to understand. Titer means concentration. As in, how much of something is in the product.

What the study found is that breast milk dilutes the vaccine. And they don't know why. This study was attempt to find out why. But they didn't. All they know is that the dilution is highest for mothers in India, and lowest for mothers in America.

The study recommends "delaying breast-feeding at the time of immunization". Not forever, just at the time. Wait an hour.

The study was there for all to read. Why didn't people read it? Why didn't all but one person on this comment thread read it?

Them stating to put off breastfeeding shows the beasts that they are !!! I can feel the words come up "there ya go" their total and utter disregard for the safety of a child thinking vaccines to be top priority over breastfeeding.. Twisted it is.. Methodical, persistent and cunning at best..... It means if your forced to subject your child to adjuvants that Breastfeeding may protect their brain some from obvious damage and autism. Lets not forget mercury and a virus that forever stays within your body and child. If a parent be smart they would breastfeed double or triple time... The strangest part is they KNOW that vaccines are dangerous to your wellbeing.. So what does that say? Do they have your best interest.. The majority of the persons pushing them KNOW They kill, maime and kill brain cells... Or cause death or all of the above.. I kind of figure truth is ALWAYS opposite of their pushed agenda..

To Roland T Flakfizer, why do you ask the question "Why didn't people read it?" Because frankly you see they KNOW that immunizations kill, maime and cause severe irreparable damage.. You seem to be a little snowed ... All the better to breastfeed more, so that it is BIG TIME diluted... If you are not up to par go seek out the millions of children maimed by vaccines... I know 8 incidents just between friends and family alone, one that died and all the others autistic permanently.. I just cant believe you got on folks for what they said.

9/11 Questions

Activist Post is an Independent News blog for Activists challenging the abuses of the establishment.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Paid advertising on Activist Post may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.

All opinions expressed by contributors to this site are theirs and theirs alone.