Dear all,
Does anybody know what is the rational in defining for the 'a=b' operation
a pointer copy and not a complete copy?
It is inconsistent from an algebraic point of view, since 'a=b' is not the
same as 'a=b+0'.
And it is also confusing for starters.
Best regards,
Frédéric Parrenin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-user/attachments/20130702/cfc13dbe/attachment.html