Ari Jolma kirjoitti:
> Tamas Szekeres kirjoitti:
>> I would be in favour of refactoring the code using the following
>> common rules:
>>>> 1. Every target class would go into a separate interface file
>> 2. Every interface file would be responsible to include the interface
>> files that it depends on.
>> 3. To avoid the name collisions we should either use namespaces (not
>> sure how it is supported by the various target languages) or prefixes
>> in the classnames
>> 4. We should declare the constants in separate interface files that
>> can be included by the others if needed.
I'll try something along these lines in
https://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/sandbox/ajolma/
Ari