Lame, **** like this is why I hate paying attention in the offseason. Hopefully it's like the Steve Smith to philly thing where he's no longer physically capable of playing to his own level and that's why we let him go, cause Kenny's arguably the best deep safety in the league not named Earl Thomas.

__________________
BK

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcheTen

JPP is a better and more productive player than Brandon Graham

Quote:

Originally Posted by abaddon41_80

Is Shaun Hill a top 10 QB? Definitely not. Is he a top 20 one? Almost certainly.

I do think Will Hill has potential to be better than him though. I like Hill. As a player. Turd human being but he's got potential as a player.

Hill has supposedly really turned his life around also which is why I'm rooting for him to do well. He was one of the biggest turds of a human in HS and College though from everything you hear. He has the potential to be a very good S in the league.

Brown as a 3rd S I'm fine with. Like I already said he won't come close to replicating last year but in Fewell's system I hope he can look somewhat similar.

I like Murphy too. 4th wr, 3rd if we lose Cruz. CAN WE PLEASE HELP THIS DEFENSE THOUGH?

Murphy can definitely replace Hixon/Barden. It'd be a very good move.

We do need lots of defensive help. Maybe we fill our depth in FA on O and then for the draft we just go all D? It looks like we're going with pretty much the same OL except for maybe a new backup or two.

I do think Will Hill has potential to be better than him though. I like Hill. As a player. Turd human being but he's got potential as a player.

I figured youd be upset. You really liked him a lot. It's only a one year deal which tells me the knee is an issue. Thats probably why he had limited interest on the market. Ifhe is as good as our fan base makes him out to be.he.certainly would have gotten a multi year deal since.he is young. That knee is a huge red flag.

I've been on spring break so I'm just sort of catching up. So upset KP is gone. I think fans never really thought he was great because he wasn't an Ed Reed/Troy Polamalu type of playmaker but he was so important and so good at what he did.

I think people will see how important he was for us this season. Finally have to get rid of my sig. A sad day.

I've been on spring break so I'm just sort of catching up. So upset KP is gone. I think fans never really thought he was great because he wasn't an Ed Reed/Troy Polamalu type of playmaker but he was so important and so good at what he did.

I think people will see how important he was for us this season. Finally have to get rid of my sig. A sad day.

Yeah he is old, and coming to a system that's not LB friendly. I am not sure if this will be a good fit. It's a passing a league, and I feel like the 43 LB isn't emphasized like previous years. Specifically, I am not sure if he is worth it in our system.

And in this passing league, in a 43 system, I think the position is getting phased out. We clearly feel a good scheme like Spags, can do with any Lbs. In this god awful scheme they are just glorified run stoppers or cover guys. They ALL stink at blitzing. Bad angles, and they never get home, which is their fault AND Fewell's fault for lack of creativity.

Lbs are not important to us and if the scheme is good, we can make do with any LB. Even a bad scheme our Lbs won't make a difference. You can have god as a LB, but if the opposing team knows your blitzes and your DC is god awful, even god will get stone walled in this mess of a system.

So LBs, in this passing era, and in our 43 system, isn't valued as much. How many mock drafts had us with a 1st round LB? It used to be every year?

Timmons, Beason, Paul P, James L, and the list goes on. I remember at one point every mock draft had us with a LB in the first round. For us, it's not an important position. The scheme made the position and Spags proved it. Fewell showed the opposite. The scheme makes everything bad. DL, LB, and secondary.

And in this passing league, in a 43 system, I think the position is getting phased out. We clearly feel a good scheme like Spags, can do with any Lbs. In this god awful scheme they are just glorified run stoppers or cover guys. They ALL stink at blitzing. Bad angles, and they never get home, which is their fault AND Fewell's fault for lack of creativity.

Lbs are not important to us and if the scheme is good, we can make do with any LB. Even a bad scheme our Lbs won't make a difference. You can have god as a LB, but if the opposing team knows your blitzes and your DC is god awful, even god will get stone walled in this mess of a system.

So LBs, in this passing era, and in our 43 system, isn't valued as much. How many mock drafts had us with a 1st round LB? It used to be every year?

Timmons, Beason, Paul P, James L, and the list goes on. I remember at one point every mock draft had us with a LB in the first round. For us, it's not an important position. The scheme made the position and Spags proved it. Fewell showed the opposite. The scheme makes everything bad. DL, LB, and secondary.

Yup spot on here. Couldn't agree more. I did want Beason though. Fewell blitzes his LB's from 25 yards out. Its insane. From the LB's we've brought in so far it does look like we're going with run stopping type players.