The CO₂ conceptThe concept of CO₂ is often used to refer to Greenhouse Gases (GHG)in general, like nitrous oxides, soot and dust particles instead of justcarbon dioxide.

Production losses and CO₂Fossil fuels (e.g. oil, gas and coal) all emit CO₂, but the differences inemission as a result of different production losses per fuel may not beas big as we think.

CO₂ prejudicesWe have to try to change the financial dependence of CO₂ experts fromresearching to solving.

The debate on climate changeThe climate has always been subject to changes, even before fossil fuelswere used.

Conceptual perceptionDue to wrong assumptions, upbringing and education we describehot or cold temperatures and large or small temperature variationsincorrectly. This obstructs development of the right solutions to theproblems we are facing.

CO₂ viewed from a different angleOnly a higher concentration of CO₂ compared to the average originalCO₂ concentration before the industrial revolution is pollution.

Comparing air to waterWe have to treat air the same as we treat water: pay for its use andclean it up for 100% after use.

The Kyoto ProtocolThe Kyoto Protocol has divided the world into two groups of countries:those who have committed themselves to reduce CO₂ emissions andin return received eternal limited emission rights and those who havereceived eternal unlimited emission rights.

Reduction is delayThe Kyoto Protocol neither reduces, nor decreases, nor lowers but onlydelays the moment when the final total quantity of CO₂ emission hasentered our atmosphere.

Delay is not wrong, but it is no solution eitherDelay as a process to limit the annual emission is not wrong, but as asolution to - potential - climate change it is inadequate.

The relocation of CO₂ emissionRelocating delayed CO₂ emission to other countries is not a solution.

CO₂ is no pollutionJust like oxygen, CO₂ is useful.

Humanity emits 6% of CO₂The target of a 5.4% delay in emission as described in the Kyoto Protocolonly has an effect of 5.4% of 6% = 0.324% on the total annual emissionof CO₂. Such a small limitation has no effect on the climate whatsoever,should CO₂ really be the cause of climate change?.

The split position of the United NationsThe United Nations put two kinds of CO₂ policy in effect: a stimulatingpolicy (the Millennium Goals) and a restraining policy (the KyotoProtocol).

Choosing between useless and useful investmentsCO₂ emission policies cost billions and have little effect now or later ascalculations show. These billions should be spent useful rather thanuseless.

Clean energyEvery government should only invest in an energy production solutionthat is available 24 hours a day or in energy storage, effectively makingintermittent sources available 24 hours a day.

Wealth through a head startBy investing in other forms of energy production now, we can beindependent of unreliable suppliers in the future and we create newsources of prosperity.

Why the USA refuses to ratify the Kyoto ProtocolThe USA does not participate in the Kyoto Protocol because of its flaws.This is an important reason to improve the Protocol, not to abolish it.

What needs to be improved in the Kyoto ProtocolThe flaws of the Kyoto Protocol are the cause that it does not have anyeffect. They need to be solved during the future Climate Conferences.If they are not recognized and removed from the Protocol, there willnever be a new effective Protocol.

The peculiarities of the Annex-1 nations list of the Kyoto Protocol Emission agreements for the Annex-1 nations are illogical and indicate that other considerations than CO₂ emission have led to the agreed quantities.

The ‘forgotten’ population growthIn the Kyoto Protocol, population growth has not been takeninto account. As a consequence of this deliberately forgotten item,differences in limitations caused by differences in population growthhave not been taken into account.

Six failed Climate ConferencesThe objective of the future Climate Conferences should be a 100%cleaning of CO₂ emissions caused by fossil fuels.

The CircleMankind can solve the too high concentration of CO₂ caused by CO₂emissions through photosynthesis. This is the instrument to disconnectCO₂ molecules and connect them into other manifestations.

Scientific research shows that earth’s has a flexible CO₂ disconnecting capacityResearch by the University of Colorado shows that the earth’s capacity to disconnect CO₂ molecules has doubled over the last 50 years.

More scientific supportSlowly but steadily more scientists support the potential of trees toclean the air from CO₂

The enormous purification power of the treeTrees offer an almost unlimited capacity of air cleaning.

The disconnection of C atoms from O atoms through trees, plants and algaeNature has various instruments to disconnect the C atom from the O atoms, but for us the most flexible to influence is the tree disconnecting capacity.

Have we got 2 billion hectares of land available?We have enough space to plant 2 billion hectares of trees.

How large is 50 million hectares?The size of Texas.

Trees grow everywhereTrees grow everywhere as long as there is sufficient capillary hangingwater.

Why to solve the problem in 40 years and not tomorrowThree years after its introduction, the Treesolution will have a largernet positive effect on cleaning CO₂ emission than is expected from thepresent dysfunctional measures of the Kyoto Protocol.

The organization of the TreesolutionSurcharging fossil fuel production and organizing a market place wherecarbon farmers are allowed to offer tree planting projects, allow us toattack the CO₂ emission problem practically and quickly.

‘From CO₂ Nature’The proposal to a working mechanism that cleans the air from CO₂excess

The figures of the TreesolutionInvestment in the Treesolution is affordable and creates wealth formillions of carbon farmers.

The ‘CO₂ emission surcharge’We can put a ‘CO₂ emission surcharge’ on oil only, or on all fossil fuels

The influence of the TreesolutionThe Treesolution solves the flaws of the Kyoto Protocol.

Criticism of the TreesolutionThe Treesolution is subject to criticism, but the arguments are partially

Those who calculate, plant treesEvery person having a long term vision plants trees as they will proveto be a good investment. Trees can serve as collateral for the financialsystem. Carbon farming will prove to be the motor of the next economicgrowth spurt and create wealth for millions.

The cynics are wrongThere might be cynics who do not believe in worldwide cooperation, butexamples such as the first Climate Treaty of Montreal concerning theozone layer damage that was organized within a time frame of only 20years, show that we are capable of cooperating globally.

Let’s not create new slaveryThe Treesolution should not harm the populations of the places where we plant. Instead, it must present an opportunity for local development.

Our problem is their chanceThe Treesolution can help end poverty of millions of families starting tofarm carbon and in the same time produce food.

Support the 'Treesolution' planThe Treesolution turns the CO₂ disadvantage into a CO₂ advantage.

Land reformA new vision and strategy on the property and use of land leads to morewealth.

The food challengeThe Treesolution cleans up fossil fuel CO₂ emissions for 100% through amoney making food producing business model.

The benefits the TreesolutionA compilation of all the benefits resulting from tree planting.

Final words to the readerThe author thanks the reader and asks him to support the Treesolutionto solve the CO₂ over-concentration problem.