New Times Survey

UNDERGROUND MILLIONAIRES OF THE SOVIET UNION

by Ivor Benson

"Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free"

THE NEW TIMES
Vol. 46, No. 9 SEPTEMBER 1981

In the following article, the distinguished South African journalist and writer examines an incredible story to come out of
the Soviet Union, and asks if it is further evidence that the whole world is being prepared for a further move towards a con-
vergence of the Communist and non-Communist world in an attempt to create a New World Order.

The Soviet Union has given up another of its biggest and
best-kept secrets-the great socialist republic, dictatorship
of the proletariat, is swarming with millionaire capitalists,
every one of them a Soviet citizen, and many in the same
league as the super-rich of the capitalist west!

It is not strange, and most significant, that this fact
should have passed unnoticed by the Western media and
Western historians for more than 60 years, a fact of major
importance that did not qualify for as much as a mention in
Time magazine's most exhaustive 45-page presentation
"Inside the U.S.S.R." in its issue of June 23, 1980!

Strange and significant, yes, but not altogether surprising
when it is remembered that Western journalists and
academics haven't yet even got around to admitting that the
Western super-rich with their banks and multi-national
companies have likewise been swarming all over the vast
country ever since the Bolshevik Revolution promoting
another kind of economic colonialism. *
The story of "Russia's Underground Millionaires" was
told in the June 29 issue of Fortune magazine, the plush
and expensive sister journal of Time, by no less an
authority than a former international law expert in the
Soviet Ministry of Justice, one Konstantin Simis, now
resident in the United States.

There is no reason to doubt the accuracy of the facts sup-
plied, but good reason to examine closely and critically the
meaning which Simis and the Fortune editors give to these
astonishing facts which have emerged so suddenly and
without warning from what is certainly the biggest area of
secrecy and disinformation (i.e. lying) in the history of man-kind.

"A RIDDLE........"

We have been permitted to peep into what Winston Chur-
chill once described as "a riddle, wrapped in a mystery in-
side an enigma" - but not for our final disillusionment, we
may be sure. "How to Succeed in Business Where Business is a Crime",
says Fortune's supplementary headline.
First of all, then, let us take a look at the "business"
which has won such rich rewards while practised underground in the world's most efficiently and most rigorously
conducted police state, whose citizens are said to live in constant dread of the KGB and its vast army of informers.

Writes Simis: "Everyone knows that the Soviet state is
the monopoly owner of all means of production and that
private enterprise is a crime. But the remarkable reality is
that in the Soviet Union a great many private enterprises
operate-at great profit. Indeed, a network of privately
controlled factories spreads across the whole country and
these factories manufacture goods worth hundreds of
millions - perhaps even billions - of rubles (A ruble is currently worth $1.40...)"
Private enterprise, he goes on, cannot for obvious
reasons handle items like motorcars and machinery, but
must concentrate on items of the kind that most people want
and can afford to buy, like clothing, shoes, artificial-leather
goods, sunglasses, costume jewellery, recordings of
Western popular music, etc.

But how do they manage to do that in a country where
every citizen is encouraged to spy on his neighbour?
Part of the answer: "A private enterprise will co-exist
under the same name and the same roof, with a state factory; it could not exist without this cover. In this symbiotic
relationship the state factory manufactures goods as called
for by the state plan. These goods appear on the factories
books and are distributed through commercial channels for
sale. But alongside these official goods the same factory is
manufacturing goods not registered in any documents.”
Goods of the first kind are called "registered for" and the
others, in the jargon of the underground are described as
"left hand".

Simis tells us that not only are there "tens of thousands"
of such factories all over the Soviet Union, most of them
concentrated in the great towns and cities like Moscow,
Odessa, Tiflis, Riga and Tashkent, but there exists also a
vast distribution network handling a "left hand" trade
worth possibly billions of dollars a year.
One "company" is mentioned, part of the "Glazenberg
empire" which owned so many factories that it was forced
to set up its own marketing group which proceeded to
organise outlets of its own in 64 towns and regions - in addition to all the outlets provided by the state.
And who are these daring and energetic businessmen who
appear to have fashioned for themselves cloaks of invisibility?

JEWISH BUSINESSMEN

Writes Simis: "For historical reasons, the underground
business milieu in the large cities of Russia, the Ukraine and
the Baltic republics has been predominantly Jewish. While
my clients included Geogians, Armenians and members of
other groups, the great majority were Jewish - like myself".

What "historical reasons"? Simis says that the Russian
Jews, after having been discriminated against by the Czarist
regime, were "liberated" by the Bolshevik Revolution,
thereafter throwing themselves eagerly into spheres of life
previously closed to them, like science, the arts, literature,
etc. He tells us that during and after World War II, Stalin
turned against the Jews, many of who were then forced to
find outlets for their energies in "underground business."

Elsewhere in his article, however, he tells us about one
Isaac Back who in the mid 1930s set about creating a family
company which by 1940 (when Stalin was at the peak of his
power) owned "at least a dozen factories manufacturing
underwear, souvenirs and notions, operating at the same
time a network of stores in all the republics of the Soviet
Union".

Some of these Jewish entrepreneurs, including Back and
one of the three Glazenberg brothers were prosecuted and
imprisoned, but evidently not enough of them to discourage
the rest. It was decided to "sacrifice" young Lazar
Glazenberg, says Simis, whose job it was to defend them in
court, "at least partly because of his playboy life-style as
reflected in his two dozen suits and the wardrobe of his
wife..."

It is significant, surely, that although private enterprise
carried on in secret must be regarded as the most dangerous
and destructive form of sabotage, being the exact antithesis
of Marxist socialism, there is no mention of this class of big-
fish offender among the hundreds of individual cases
discussed by Alexander Solzhenitsyn in the three volumes of
his Gulag Archipelago; indeed, Jewish prisoners are rarely
mentioned by Solzhenitsyn, whereas, judging by their
names, there was no scarcity of Jews among the slave camp
bosses —Aron Solts, Jakov Rappaport, Matvei Berman,
Lazar Kogan and, most notorious of all, Naftaly Frenkel
who appears to have master-minded the whole technique of
slave labour. Nor have big businessmen figured at all pro-
minently in the great show trials, which the Western media
were permitted to report and dramatise.

Next question: Why should this kind of activity with its
almost fabulous rewards, plus attendant dangers, be confined almost exclusively to Jewish citizens of the Soviet
Union?

DOLLARS FOR ISRAEL

Simis gives us what is obviously an important part of the
answer: "The sense of national identity among Jewish
underground businessmen is strong - much stronger than
that of the Soviet Jewish intelligentsia. There may not be
many among them who understand what Zionism is all
about - even fewer who are prepared to relinquish their for-
tunes and emigrate to Israel - yet I never met a single one
who was indifferent to the fate of that country and who did
not feel a blood relationship with it. It came as no surprise to
me that during the Six-day War the underground business-men in many cities donated large sums in dollars
- not rubles but dollars - to Israel"

These underground business tycoons would have been
much assisted, we may be sure, by another circumstance
revealed by Simis: "Nevertheless many Jewish
underground businessmen of all ages eagerly join the Communist party for desperately practical motives: to enhance
their social prestige and gain some shield - beyond bribery -
to keep them from being prosecuted by the DCMSP".

Here he seems to have forgotten what he told us a few
paragraphs back - that Jews were forced into underground
business by discrimination that excluded them from the par-
ty and state hierarchy.

Simis explains how the wheels of the "left hand" industry
are copiously oiled with bribes. The blue-collar factory
workers are bribed with additional tax-free incomes to work
for the private operator and keep their mouths shut, as are
also the clerical personnel and foremen; bigger bribes are
paid to officials whose duty it is to establish quantity and
quality norms for goods manufactured for the state, giving
the private operator his main supplies of raw materials in
the form of surpluses which don't have to be recorded; and
the biggest bribes of all are those paid to officials of the
DCPSP, which is an arm of the KGB whose precise task it is
to "combat the misappropriation of Soviet property".

TO WHAT END?

It would appear that the underground businessmen who
are caught and punished are those whose operations have
become too glaringly obvious, like one Golidze who "owned two magnificent houses, luxuriously furnished with antiques bought from dealers in Moscow and Leningrad" and
who "entertained officials with banquets which would go
on for hours..."
Most Soviet tycoons try not to be too ostentatious as they
stash away most of their wealth in foreign currencies, precious stones, metals and gold coins. Simis tells us that
during the 1960s and 1970s the salon of one Elizabeth
Mirkien enjoyed great popularity in Moscow, for here
middle-aged businessmen could enjoy excellent meals, plus
the euphoria of feeling rich as they risked the loss of huge
stakes at cards and roulette.

"But all to what end?" asks Simis rhetorically. "Dealers
in precious stones in Moscow, Tashkent, Riga and other
cities continue to operate diligently to this day, filling the
caches of underground millionaires with their wares. These
caches amount to vast treasures, probably worth more than
all the pirate booty in Caribbean waters. And yet - what
about their owners? What are they waiting for? A fabulous
future time when they will be able to unearth their riches and
regally use them? Or the downfall of the Soviet regime?"

So what does it all mean? Simis himself doesn't seem to
know, for he ends his article and, presumable, also the book
he has been writing, with unanswered questions.
If we are to have any hope of getting at the real and final
meaning of the Simis story, experience should have taught
us that we are here exerting our investigative skills in an area
of maximum falsification and concealment in which devices
of deception are used which are the product of centuries,
even millennia of practice and accumulated experience.
Winston Churchill was certainly not exaggerating when
he described the Soviet Union as "a riddle, wrapped in a
mystery inside an enigma"

"AN INSPIRED GUESS"

In these circumstances, the truth, if it is to be found is
more likely to be the product of what, for want of any better
description, we call insight, or, as some would say, "an in-
spired guess", than the product of a detailed and laborious
study and juxtaposition of all the available facts — which, in
any case, are always in short supply. Therefore we should
know in advance that the truth we are seeking is not some-
thing that can ever be "proved" with evidence and argu-
ment; it is "truth" of a kind which only unfolding history
can prove or refute.

For example, no one was ever able to "prove" Oswald
Spengler's axiom that "there is no proletarian movement,
not even a Communist one, which does not operate in the in-
terest of money...” and yet it is one that continues to offer
the clearest, most coherent and most consistent explanation
of much that has happened in the world since those words
were written more than 60 years ago. Likewise, Douglas
Reed's dictum that "similar men, with a common aim,
secretly rule in both camps"- the capitalist West and the
Soviet Union.

Insights of this kind are not pure guesswork, but can be
described metaphorically as the product of some higher
computing process of the mind in which the enquirer, having absorbed as many as possible of the available hard facts,
is able to "tune in" emotionally to the motivational systems
involved - rather like having electronic bugging devices
planted inside the minds of those men whose policies and ac-
tions are being studied. The infinitely wise Chinese call this
jen ai, putting yourself in the place of the other person, the
secret of all skill in human relations, whether these are
friendly or hostile.

Now then, let us place ourselves in the position of
Konstantin Simis and of his former Kremlin bosses and see
what turns up. We are told in a biographical piece in Fortune
that from 1953 Simis acted as defence lawyer for dozens of
prominent underground businessmen, giving up his practice
in 1971 to join the Ministry of Justice as an international law
expert.
In 1976 the KGB raided his apartment and seized the
manuscript of a book on Soviet corruption, the first draft of
which was already in the hands of an American publisher.
Then Simis and his wife Dina, who was also a lawyer, were
told that unless they left the Soviet Union they would be sent
to a hard labour camp. Simis could hardly be expected to
regard this as severe punishment for so grave an offence, for
he was able to join his son who was already established at
Johns Hopkins University as director of a Soviet studies
programme, thus acquiring a vastly improved launching
pad for his literary assault on the Soviet regime.

All this does not make good sense in terms of the ostensible motives and expected natural reactions of those involved
- whereas, the expulsion of Solzhenitsyn is precisely what
could have been expected by those able to share with the
Soviet bosses the awful dilemma of what to do with a man
who had become the glowing symbol of an awakened and
aroused young Russian intelligentsia.

A BIG CHANGE COMING?

In our interpretation, what we are seeing today are the
first signs of dramatic change in the picture of the Soviet
Union as presented by the Western media and contemporary
historians. In other words, the whole story of what has hap-
pened since the Bolshevik Revolution is going to have to be
retold in a revised form.

Chapman Pincher in his book Their Trade is Treachery tells us that KGB agents like Kim Philby, Guy Burgess and
others had been taught that when being investigated they
must keep their interrogators talking for the purpose of finding out how much these interrogators already know for
certain, so that their own story can be tailored to fit in with
facts that cannot be disputed. Moreover, finding out what is
already known, the person being investigated is warned in
time to change his original story as he goes along.

The story which the people of the West have been getting
since before the Bolshevik Revolution is now going to be adjusted to accommodate and absorb information, which has
been seeping through and which could quite soon be common property. For the future edification of a deliberately
stupefied public opinion in the West, there are to be, as it
were, "guided tours" through what were hitherto "no-go"
areas in the realm of news reporting, public debate and con-
temporary history writing.
A start must be made in preparing the public for changes inside the Soviet Union and in
East-West relations, which are pending, or, at any rate, intended. These changes could be of a magnitude, and every
bit as traumatic as, the changes inside the Moscow-Berlin
pact of 1939 or the process of de-Stalinisation after World
War II.

A CONVERGENCE

Implied in the policies and actions of the leading Western
powers, the U.S.A. in particular, is the assumption that all
are working towards the "ideal" of some sort of convergence of the two worlds, an ''ideal'' that does not, however,
exclude the possibility of a third world war.

Meanwhile, it is
becoming increasingly obvious that economic socialism of
the kind implemented in the Soviet Union by Lenin and his
successors cannot ever be made to work. It is, therefore,
highly significant that in the Soviet Union, as Simis shows,
there has come into existence a vast network of super-rich
capitalists, matching in so many ways the super-rich
capitalists of the West, ready to take over when the present
system of totalitarian state capitalism finally collapses, as
collapse it must, sooner or later. How else? And who better
entitled to take over than "heroes" of the underground,
anti-Communist, counter-revolutionary struggle, freedom,
every one of them "freedom fighters" in the new dispen-
sation?

*Vodka-Cola, Charles Levinson's massive "expose" of the
involvement of Western banks and multi-national companies in the
expanding Soviet economy, and the publicity given to this book in a
BBC television documentary earlier this year, must be seen as part of
the same historical phenomena as the Simis report.
What is not
generally known is that Levinson is a key figure in the international
trade union movement, with headquarters in Paris. In this way the one-Worlders aim to retain control of the minds of the trade union masses
by themselves undertaking to reveal much of the truth that can no
longer be concealed. T
his is done with an exhaustively documented,
highly plausible story carefully tailored to prevent the workers from
finding out that they are themselves just as much under the control of
the super-capitalists as the banks and companies operating in the
U.S.S.R.