<quoted text> Once a dingleberry, always a dingleberry, his views are not different than the presidents. You are so ignorant that it went right over your narrow mind. Education, fairness in taxation, cooperation in governing, etc....... What kind of a moron are you that you can't even present a discussion topic without losing the debate on your own . Idiot. Idiot . Idiot. DINGLEBERRY!!!!!!!!!

One needs to take it easy on mr dingleberry because his level of Polish, as far as I could read it was all swear words with a few simpleton words thrown in, meaning he is from Greenpoint. You have to excuse the likes of him.

<quoted text> Once a dingleberry, always a dingleberry, his views are not different than the presidents. You are so ignorant that it went right over your narrow mind. Education, fairness in taxation, cooperation in governing, etc....... What kind of a moron are you that you can't even present a discussion topic without losing the debate on your own . Idiot. Idiot . Idiot. DINGLEBERRY!!!!!!!!!

<quoted text>One needs to take it easy on mr dingleberry because his level of Polish, as far as I could read it was all swear words with a few simpleton words thrown in, meaning he is from Greenpoint. You have to excuse the likes of him.

School children can't see the White House on their spring break because obama is saving money, so he sends his sasha and malia to the Bahamas for their spring break, the hypocricy of this president and his followers is mind numbing.

<quoted text>One needs to take it easy on mr dingleberry because his level of Polish, as far as I could read it was all swear words with a few simpleton words thrown in, meaning he is from Greenpoint. You have to excuse the likes of him.

I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and SHIT a better argument than that. You're so ugly, when you were born your mom said "What a treasure" and your dad said "Yea lets go bury it"! I'd like to see things from your point of view but I can't seem to get my head that far up my ass. I'll bet you break wind under the covers and get high on your own fumes Dingleberry.

<quoted text> I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and SHIT a better argument than that. You're so ugly, when you were born your mom said "What a treasure" and your dad said "Yea lets go bury it"! I'd like to see things from your point of view but I can't seem to get my head that far up my ass. I'll bet you break wind under the covers and get high on your own fumes Dingleberry.

You are a Dingleberry on my east end. The best part of you ran down your mothers leg ( who by the way has a bigger penis than you ). Your birth certificate is an apology from a condom manufacturer. At birth the doctor thought you were so ugly he threw you in the trash and handed your mother the placenta by mistake. Your mother protested, Lord only knows why- big mistake as it turns out.

<quoted text>Your inference on the post script is askew as likely for such a liberal. It was merely a public service message, and I fear no one, especially liberals, I find them entertaining, like circus clowns.

<quoted text>it's not a matter of "disqualification," it's a matter of electability.

Islam does not recognize or accept the principle of separation of Church and State. There is only one law in Islam - the religious law (sharia) is also the civil law. Supreme authority over both religious and civil matters is vested in the same person (e.g., Caliph, Sultan) One who is a devout Muslim, seeking the office of POTUS, would have great difficulty swearing the oath of office to preserve, protect & defend the Constitution's Establishment clause.

This fact in turn would pose political problems for any Islamic candidate in terms of the electoral acceptability in the minds of the voters, as a practical reality.

Maybe to people who have a conspiracy notion. A "reality" that a candidate running for president would try and take over the established principles of the country, based on your preconceived notion about Muslims? That's called xenophobia...

I'm not saying Islamic nations aren't under sharia law, but to assert ANY Muslim running for president would have "difficulty" defending the constitution is a presupposition, and belongs no where in civilized society...

Plus, MANY of today's politicians, especially in the GOP, base their voting on the bible. They base all of their preconceived notions on many social issues on the bible... Isn't that the same as those Islamic (sharia law) nations you were just speaking of?

So, why are Americans, and republicans in general, okay with voting for someone who gets their morality on issues such as abortion, women, and as we're seeing now, marriage, from a holy book? And why aren't people like you, who claim they don't want religion taking over the government (sharia law) standing up and boycotting THOSE politicians?

I just don't get the hypocritical notion of a group saying "if the president were Muslim, that would pose a political risk," while those same people vote for someone trying to ban abortion strictly on the moral ground of the bible...

Instead of acknowledging it is possible to have a valid point-of-view that is different than the presidents, the long knives have come out to plunge into the back of a famous black neurosurgeon who worked his way up from poverty to the top.

The left-wingers know his story is a powerful counter-point to the woe is me, everyones-a-victim-and-shoul d-be-on-the-government-dole narrative, and therefore, he has to be destroyed.

Watch your back Dr. Ben Carson.

And yes, watch your back Dr. Carson...

Because having a creationist notion of the world is NOT a "valid" point of view...

Nor is comparing gay relations to beastiality...

Again, I love the notion of conservatives painting a "you don't like him because he's republican" mentality, however, in the case of Dr. Carson, it's his absurd claims that make him undesirable to liberals.

"Doctor" is even a little subject as Dr Carson has NEVER: performed any experiments, never submitted his articles for peer review, never adhered to then scientific method, never submitted any hypothesized articles, nor ever provided proof for the things he's claimed...

In other words, congrats republicans, you've found a doctor who doesn't even understand how science works...

Is he a good neurologist? Absolutely, but that doesn't give him authority to speak on subjects of geology, astronomy, embryology, genealogy, or historical evolution...

Oh and here, I'm a liberal acknowledging the president isn't super human, nor is he 100% on any issue... There, now will you stop with the "liberals think the president is holier then though" crap?

<quoted text>Maybe to people who have a conspiracy notion. A "reality" that a candidate running for president would try and take over the established principles of the country, based on your preconceived notion about Muslims? That's called xenophobia...I'm not saying Islamic nations aren't under sharia law, but to assert ANY Muslim running for president would have "difficulty" defending the constitution is a presupposition, and belongs no where in civilized society...Plus, MANY of today's politicians, especially in the GOP, base their voting on the bible. They base all of their preconceived notions on many social issues on the bible... Isn't that the same as those Islamic (sharia law) nations you were just speaking of?So, why are Americans, and republicans in general, okay with voting for someone who gets their morality on issues such as abortion, women, and as we're seeing now, marriage, from a holy book? And why aren't people like you, who claim they don't want religion taking over the government (sharia law) standing up and boycotting THOSE politicians?I just don't get the hypocritical notion of a group saying "if the president were Muslim, that would pose a political risk," while those same people vote for someone trying to ban abortion strictly on the moral ground of the bible...

Look, little man - you asked a question - I answered it. Not with opinion or "presuppositions," but with simple, well-known FACT about Islam.

Your response makes it clear your ignorance of Islam is more profound than I have time or interest in helping you with.

Additionally, I have no appetitite for discouse with schmucks who make a lot of completely baseless presumptions about what I think, and put bullshit rhetorical strawman words in my mouth.

<quoted text>Maybe to people who have a conspiracy notion. A "reality" that a candidate running for president would try and take over the established principles of the country, based on your preconceived notion about Muslims? That's called xenophobia...I'm not saying Islamic nations aren't under sharia law, but to assert ANY Muslim running for president would have "difficulty" defending the constitution is a presupposition, and belongs no where in civilized society...Plus, MANY of today's politicians, especially in the GOP, base their voting on the bible. They base all of their preconceived notions on many social issues on the bible... Isn't that the same as those Islamic (sharia law) nations you were just speaking of?So, why are Americans, and republicans in general, okay with voting for someone who gets their morality on issues such as abortion, women, and as we're seeing now, marriage, from a holy book? And why aren't people like you, who claim they don't want religion taking over the government (sharia law) standing up and boycotting THOSE politicians?I just don't get the hypocritical notion of a group saying "if the president were Muslim, that would pose a political risk," while those same people vote for someone trying to ban abortion strictly on the moral ground of the bible...

<quoted text>And yes, watch your back Dr. Carson...Because having a creationist notion of the world is NOT a "valid" point of view...Nor is comparing gay relations to beastiality...Again, I love the notion of conservatives painting a "you don't like him because he's republican" mentality, however, in the case of Dr. Carson, it's his absurd claims that make him undesirable to liberals."Doctor" is even a little subject as Dr Carson has NEVER: performed any experiments, never submitted his articles for peer review, never adhered to then scientific method, never submitted any hypothesized articles, nor ever provided proof for the things he's claimed...In other words, congrats republicans, you've found a doctor who doesn't even understand how science works...Is he a good neurologist? Absolutely, but that doesn't give him authority to speak on subjects of geology, astronomy, embryology, genealogy, or historical evolution...Oh and here, I'm a liberal acknowledging the president isn't super human, nor is he 100% on any issue... There, now will you stop with the "liberals think the president is holier then though" crap?

And obama has his PhD. in what? His M.D. in what? He is a community organizer with marginal academic achievement hoisted on the shoulders of fools and elected president. The same people always pick what's behind door # 2. Clueless.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.