Unfortunately, no one wants to take his guns away.. but makes great non news don't it???

Click to expand...

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban, picking up every one of them. Mr. and Mrs. America turn them all in. I would have done that." - Dianne Feinstein

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban, picking up every one of them. Mr. and Mrs. America turn them all in. I would have done that." - Dianne Feinstein

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban, picking up every one of them. Mr. and Mrs. America turn them all in. I would have done that." - Dianne Feinstein

Can't you guys be honest? She was talking about assault weapons. She did not want to ban all guns. There was no such thing up for a vote.

Click to expand...

Not only that - she had Ronald Reagan on her side.

Reagan joined former Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter in a letter published in the Boston Globe that called on Congress to pass a ban on assault weapons. Later, in a letter to Rep. Scott Klug, a Wisconsin Republican, Reagan said the limitations proposed by the Assault Weapon Ban â€śare absolutely necessaryâ€ť and that it â€śmust be passed.â€ť

Reagan's support of the Assault Weapons Ban in 1994 may have directly led to the ban winning the approval of Congress. Congress passed the ban by a vote of 216-214. In addition to Klug voting for the ban after Reaganâ€™s last minute plea, Rep. Dick Swett, D-N.H., also credited Reaganâ€™s support of the bill for helping him decide to cast a favorable vote.

Turn in your gun and buy some scissors, nuts with guns are scared to death of haircut scissors, they will instantly drop their gun and surrender when they see "Janet Napolitano Scissors" also get under a desk, the Nuts hate to shoot people who are under desks.

He makes some good points but why can't gun and ammo sense and prosecuting criminals both be discussed? It seems like if you discuss one thing you can't discuss another thing. I think most people can walk and chew gum at the same time. We can't talk about gun clip capacities and prosecuting criminals at the same time? We need a comprehensive discussion to reduce gun violence.

Turn in your gun and buy some scissors, nuts with guns are scared to death of haircut scissors, they will instantly drop their gun and surrender when they see "Janet Napolitano Scissors" also get under a desk, the Nuts hate to shoot people who are under desks.

His point was that no one is trying to take away guns yet clearly Feinstein made it clear that if she had the votes she would have taking away people's assault weapons.

Why is her bill different today....she's learned. She knows she has no shot at picking those assault weapons up so she's getting what she can today in the hopes that tomorrow she can pick up more.

Click to expand...

You posted a link that said she wanted to take away all guns in the title....a disingenuous narrative that is put out there on purpose. It's a flat out lie. Kind of like getting people to believe that the police won't protect anyone because they don't have to based on a decision to keep people for suing them whenever a good outcome isn't achieved....while they are putting their ives on the line.

You posted a link that said she wanted to take away all guns in the title....a disingenuous narrative that is put out there on purpose. It's a flat out lie. Kind of like getting people to believe that the police won't protect anyone because they don't have to based on a decision to keep people for suing them whenever a good outcome isn't achieved....while they are putting their ives on the line.

Click to expand...

I posted a link to her comments. The link was labled "all guns". I never said that she said that she was referring to all guns although I'm sure if she could it would include most guns.

But the fact remains that she would have, if she could have, passed a law that would take guns (assault weapons) out of the hands of American citizens.

So there are in fact people who want to take guns away from Americans. In fact, there are Socialists like Lawrence O'Donnell who would take away all guns in America.

"my views, which would ban all guns in America....." - Lawrence O'Donnell

BTW, I never said that police wouldn't protect anyone. I said that the courts have made it clear that the police do not have a duty to protect individuals. This is a fact. I also demonstrated that, even in an emergency situation, police response can be 8-30 minutes depending on the location. Again, this is a fact.
Is it possible that you could create any more strawmen than you do currectly?