Pages

Monday, November 14, 2011

Pathological Systems and Penn State

By Sandra Brown

The nation is aghast at the PennState
sexual abuse/rape and subsequent cover up of the repeated assaults of young
boys over a 15 year period. This case reminds us that even the most loved of
places, those with the best of reputations, can have pathology coursing in its
veins and leadership.

Jerry Sandusky a former coach is charged with sexual abuse
of eight boys (and more victims stepping forward are expected). Tallying it all
up currently includes 40 counts; 21 of them are felonies spanning 15 years of
abuse having gained access to them through The
Second Mile, a youth foundation he started ‘to help kids’. (Am sure the sexually
abused children are saying ‘Gee thanks for that help.’)

Each of the 21 felonies carries 7-20 years and $15-25k fine
with 19 misdemeanors carrying 2-5 years and $5-10k fine. Needless to say, the
court rightfully so, finds the abuse allegations to be extensive. We can only
guess how many rapes that accounts for over a 15 year span…and how many
victims.

Mike McQueary, assistant foot ball coach witnessed at least
one of the rapes in 2002 during which he watched, did not stop it, and did not
immediately report it to law enforcement including campus police.

He did however pass the buck for reporting the rape by telling
head coach Joe Paterno who also did not report to police, including campus
police. A 23 page grand jury report said Paterno was told in 2002 about the
sexual assault against an approximately aged 10 year old boy in the shower at
the university.

McQueary also passed the buck to Tim Curley, the athletic
director and Gary Schultz the Senior Vice President (whose duties included the
oversight of the university police) about the assault, none of whom also made
the mandated child protective reports and reports to law enforcement.

Paterno’s defense to what he did not report was that
McQueary was ‘distraught but didn’t tell
me specific actions that occurred.’ There is no evidence that Paterno
followed up to find what specific actions had occurred, or turned over the
alleged ‘distraught’ concerns to
child protective services or campus law enforcement.

All citizens are considered to be mandated reporters in
child abuse cases and certainly university staffs are trained in reporting
protocols for both the university and the state since they work with students.
However, none of those protocols were followed and none of the mandatory
reporting laws seemed to be applicable to them. You do not have to prove child
abuse—you simply have to have a suspicion of abuse and then you are mandated to
report. Child protection services and law enforcement will take it from there.

A naked adult with a naked child is not a suspicion. That is
a crime and a fact that is mandated, not only legally but ethically and
morally.

Mike McQueary did not follow up checking with police or
campus police to make sure Paterno, Curley or Schultz actually filed a report. While
it is appropriate that he told others, it is not enough. The law is not ‘tell
your boss and walk away’. It’s that you report. Whatever you do after that for ‘on
the job’ notification to your superiors is separate and distinct from
reporting. University staff is always trained in abuse protocols. It’s not that
they didn’t know what they were supposed to do.

While being labeled as a ‘whistle blower’ about the
university might be uncomfortable and a motivation for not reporting directly
to law enforcement, it is not nearly as uncomfortable as being raped and
scarred for life. It’s not nearly as uncomfortable as a child who knows you saw
what happened to them in a shower and did not help them…in the moment or later.

Ramifications? Being labeled as a whistle blower, or being
fired for covering it up—I mean ‘really?’
are we comparing those consequences with those of eight little boys whose lives
were ruined from adults looking the other way. A job is equal to a rape in
terms of ramifications? It was hid to save their jobs?

Let’s count here….

1. Sandusky never confessed to what he had done
to save himself from jail and keep a job.
Considering he’s a pedophile, not many were expecting him to have insight
about how his behaviors were destroying someone else.

McQueary, a flicker of conscience…not in the middle of the
rape, not even that evening as he went to bed…but the next day and a couple
more notifications to others but not pushing the envelope enough to ask his
superiors if they did something about
his suspicions. Not wanting to incur the wrath of employers? Not wanting to
seem outside of the good ol boy’s club that anything goes….job protection.

Curly never reported suspicions of abuse.

Schultz as a Senior Vice President and who oversaw campus
police never reported suspicions of abuse.

Who does that? Who places employment before anal penetration?
Who places their football ego in front of oral rape? Who shows up year after
year for work walking passed the showers where innocence was lost? Who oversees
campus police and doesn’t make a report of suspicions? What kind of pathology
does that?

But instead, this moment of looking at not only individual
pathology but corporate pathology is being lost. Instead of looking at the
kinds of symptoms pathology perpetrates in the individual and in systems, we
are instead hyper-empathically focused on micro issues: The ‘conflicted’
pedophile, the social psychology of why others look on and do nothing, the
severe motivation of job loss at high levels, how well loved a coach is as
evidence of guilt or innocence.

We miss seeing that when pathologicals are at the head
guiding the system, they are making deep psychological imprints of their own pathological
world views projected like a cult-reality on the screen of other’s psyches.
That’s it not just an individual that can be sick, its entire systems that are
guided by pathological and psychopathic belief systems. (Anyone ever read
Snakes in Suits by the world’s leading expert in white collar psychopathic
behavior, Dr. Robert Hare?)

It took a system, not just an individual, to cover up 15
years of rape. It took the camaraderie of people who collectively had reduced
empathy and conscience to hide the fact that little boys were penetrated, and
kids were trafficked to psychopathic benefactors. Now there are allegations
that the rape and assault of little boys were used as perks to pedophile
benefactors. It’s called human
trafficking.

This did not happen in a vacuum as most trafficking,
extended abuse, and cover up normally doesn’t. It takes individual and
corporate pathology to create an environment of longevity and invisibility to
perpetrate 15 years of rape. It takes pathology on many levels from being the
pedophile to being a silent accessory to the crime to allow over a decade of
soul destroying abuse in a psychopathic fraternity of football narcissism.

Systemic pathology has been seen through the years in the
church, in the military, in the white house, in the FBI---in any large system.
How did thousands come to believe that the holocaust was the right thing to do?
It happened when one pathological in a system created a systemic belief system
and brought into that system at high management levels other persons whose own
pathology shared the basic core belief systems and those beliefs found their
home and their spark with the pathological leader.

Think all of the players are not likely pathological? Want to split hairs about which Cluster B diagnosis
they are likely to fall into and our inability to really diagnosis someone if
they aren’t in front of us? I don’t. You can see from this case what happens
when someone does not have enough empathy, enough insight into how their
behavior affects others, enough guilt, enough conscience, or enough remorse. Whether
the perps and accessories are cleanly in the ranges of secure diagnosis really
doesn’t matter because even reduced amounts of these traits-of-humanity have caused pathological results in the lives of
children. Here is an example when a Cluster B is really a Cluster F for
everyone in their paths.

Pathology In Systems

The Psychopathic Checklist helps us view elements of
pathology that can perhaps help us to expand the view to see pathology active
not in just a person but in a system. I have check marked those that I think we
can apply to the pathological belief system of the department/portions of
departments that were involved. (Below is the Psychopathy Checklist- Revised
created by Dr. Robert Hare).

Glibness/superficial
charm (at least applicable to the charm and support and near-riots of the
followers of Paterno).

Grandiose
sense of self-worth (entitled to not follow the mandated reporting laws of
child abuse)

Lack of realistic long-term goals (lack of
realistic long term outcomes of suppressing child abuse)

Impulsivity

Irresponsibility

Juvenile delinquency

Early behavior problems

Revocation of conditional
release

Promiscuous sexual behavior

Many short-term marital
relationships

Criminal versatility (lots of versatility
displayed)

Acquired behavioral sociopathy/sociological
conditioning (Item 21: a newly identified trait i.e. a person relying on
sociological strategies and tricks to deceive) (developed within the context of
a pathological system and leader).

Out of 21 items, 13 items if applied to the pathological
system can be viewed checked off in the above list. That’s 65%.

Perpetration of
Pathology By Non-Recognition

Hoping that the mental health system is going to jump in
here and help with public pathology education? The perpetration of pathology invisibility is highly related
to the lack of pathology education even within the mental health field. The
inability to spot pathology in others, and certainly as we can see, the
inability to spot it in systems, has kept the mental health field largely
another system unable to identify it.

To the mental health field’s defense, Robert Hare (world’s
psychopathy expert) calls these disorders the ‘disorders of social hiding.’ That is, they look normal in the
context of their setting (especially when sprinkled in with more pathology that
camouflages glaring overtness in any single one person). The more successful,
wealthy, or well-liked one is, the less likely they are to be noticed as
pathological. Mix it with the hyper-empathy and positive psychology approach of
some clinicians and you have all the Kum-By-Yah’ness
behind which pathology never gets pointed out and none of the forensic
attunement that might help others learn from these examples of pathology.

My case in point, having started a discussion on several professional
therapist forums, these are the responses that clue us in to whether the mental
health field will lead us in the much needed public pathology education
awareness field….

My posting was “Calling
everyone who understand pathology: Do not let the PennState
teaching moment be lost in translation in words that do not teach pathology in
action. This is not merely 'abuse' -- this is pathology in both those who did
it and those who hide it. Who Does That? Help other see the Cluster B disorders
in action. Use the real language!’

The responses were:

“I take exception to
the use of PennState being a teachable moment. It’s is
my alma mater…1 football coach does not define the entire institution.”

“IMO the abuser is less
guilty than those who covered up.”

“Perhaps we should discuss why people who knew did not act
appropriately. What about these crimes (rapes) shut them down morally. Is
something like this too overwhelming for the average person to deal with, thus they
shut down?”

“As professionals we owe our clients to explore their case in all it's
uniqueness and individuality….Why does this client have the craving for this
abnormal sexual fondness of children?...we remain a blank screen on which the client
can write the story of his life. As a professional I can see myself having
empathy even with a pedophile… as for myself I am extremely disgusted with the
persecutor and his helpers. “

“The DSM can diagnose and predict and structure, but can not understand
an individual's core conflict. This work can only be done one session at a time
with compassion and lots if patience with our support as a holding environment.”

“I agree that this is definitely a teachable moment for our students. If
we talk about a possible diagnosis with the goal of building compassion, then I
can get on board with that.”

In those statements is very little pathological
identification (outside of pedophilia) especially in the accessories to the
crime. While many of those accessories who turned a blind eye to the rapes are
likely to be legally and criminally considered accessories to the crime, few of
us are holding them to the same standard. We are interested in understanding
them, not insulting an institution because someone attended there and seems to
think this is a case about one coach and not all the other accessories—we are
more interested in extending patience, support, compassion for the child rapist
and accessories.

I don’t see much interest in the
world at large for exposing pathology for what it is so others can identify it
in the future. If we don’t learn from what we have experienced, how do we bring
that experience to light? I see little help in understanding pathology in
corporate constructs or bilateral distribution of the crime of not reporting. Instead,
the public outcry as witnessed on campus is a snapshot of the social investment
to a perception—that there was one pedophile and that’s the end of the story.

From whom shall we look to
understand personal and corporate pathology? Where shall our public pathology
education come from?

1 comment:

Sandra: Very enlightening piece! It's an uphill battle against the good ol'boy network, the institution of following the age old "chain of command" (as in state government), even if the chain has many broken links and the "pride of football crap." In the meantime, it's anything goes while these boys suffer unspeakable damage!But, something keeps all of us on the path to help right the wrongs!

Disclaimer

The opinions and information expressed in the individual posts do not necessarily reflect the opinions of each contributor of "Time's Up!" nor the opinion of the blog owner and administrator. The comments are the opinion and property of the individuals who leave them on the posts and do not express the opinion of the authors, contributors or the blog owner and administrator.