ScienceDaily (Jan. 26, 2012) — Earth is alive, asserts a revolutionary scientific theory of life emerging from Case Western Reserve University
School of Medicine. The trans-disciplinary theory demonstrates that purportedly inanimate, non-living objects -- for example, planets, water,
proteins, and DNA -- are animate, that is, alive. With its broad explanatory power, applicable to all areas of science and medicine, this novel
paradigm aims to catalyze a veritable renaissance.

Erik Andrulis, PhD, assistant professor of molecular biology and microbiology, advanced his controversial framework in his manuscript "Theory of the
Origin, Evolution, and Nature of Life," published in the peer-reviewed journal, Life. His theory explains not only the evolutionary emergence of life
on earth and in the universe but also the structure and function of existing cells and biospheres.

In addition to resolving long-standing paradoxes and puzzles in chemistry and biology, Dr. Andrulis' theory unifies quantum and celestial mechanics.
His unorthodox solution to this quintessential problem in physics differs from mainstream approaches, like string theory, as it is simple,
non-mathematical, and experimentally and experientially verifiable. As such, the new portrait of quantum gravity is radical.

The basic idea of Dr. Andrulis' framework is that all physical reality can be modeled by a single geometric entity with life-like characteristics:
the gyre. The so-called "gyromodel" depicts objects -- particles, atoms, chemicals, molecules, and cells -- as quantized packets of energy and
matter that cycle between excited and ground states around a singularity, the gyromodel's center. A singularity is itself modeled as a gyre, wholly
compatible with the thermodynamic and fractal nature of life. An example of this nested, self-similar organization is the Russian Matryoshka doll.

By fitting the gyromodel to facts accumulated over scientific history, Dr. Andrulis confirms the proposed existence of eight laws of nature. One of
these, the natural law of unity, decrees that the living cell and any part of the visible universe are irreducible. This law formally establishes that
there is one physical reality.

Another natural law dictates that the atomic and cosmic realms abide by identical organizational constraints. Simply put, atoms in the human body and
solar systems in the universe move and behave in the exact same manner.

"Modern science lacks a unifying, interdisciplinary theory of life. In other words, current theories are unable to explain why life is the way it is
and not any other way," Dr. Andrulis says. "This general paradigm furnishes a fresh perspective on the character and meaning of life, offers
solutions to protracted problems, and strives to end divisive debates."

One debate swirls around the scientific merit of James Lovelock's popular Gaia hypothesis. By showing that Earth is theoretically synonymous with
life, Dr. Andrulis' paradigm substantiates the Gaian premise that all organisms and their surroundings on earth are closely integrated to form a
single self-regulating complex system.

Another legendary quarrel is that between biblical creationists and neo-Darwinian evolutionists. In demonstrating that the origin and evolution of
life is a consequence of natural laws and physical forces, this theory synthesizes arguments and dispels assumptions from both sides of the
creation-evolution debate.

To test his paradigm, Dr. Andrulis designed bidirectional flow diagrams that both depict and predict the dynamics of energy and matter. While such
diagrams may be foreign to some scientists, they are standard reaction notation to chemists, biochemists, and biologists.

Dr. Andrulis has used his theory to successfully predict and identify a hidden signature of RNA biogenesis in his laboratory at Case Western Reserve
University School of Medicine. He is now applying the gyromodel to unify and explain the evolution and development of human beings.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There's the complete article, comment to follow

The reason I decided to post the entire article first, is because I was at a loss for words, just thinking about all the people that have provided the
math and theory that was obviously used in the creation of this new theory. Knowing that the whole time that they were on to something, yet no body
wanted to pay attention(mainstream that is).

"The so-called "gyromodel" depicts objects -- particles, atoms, chemicals, molecules, and cells -- as quantized packets of energy and matter that
cycle between excited and ground states around a singularity, the gyromodel's center. A singularity is itself modeled as a gyre, wholly compatible
with the thermodynamic and fractal nature of life."

This is the very model in which Nassim Haramein proposed in his lecture, 'Crossing The Event Horizon'. Also, the documentary 'Thrive' as well
touched base on this very same understanding of the underlying principals that govern the universe.

Those who are familiar with sacred geometry and the theories behind the metaphysics of the universe all know that this has never been a secret. In
fact, has always been the foundation behind much of the symbolism used today and through out history(such as carvings found all around the world,
using geometric carvings and statues that symbolize this very thing).

The very notion that this implies only goes to reiterate much of the ancient texts that have been apart of the evolving religions that are present
today. As well has contributed to much of the philosophies and doctrines that have emerged.

The very idea of merging the material plane and the fractal geometry(non-linear) it entails, with the idea of life, which then gives way to
consciousness is an exciting new(to mainstream science) area of physics and research. I can't wait to see what comes of this, and what can be
achieved with this knowledge once the theory becomes law.

If anybody can show me means of obtaining a copy of:
Erik Andrulis, PhD, "Theory of the Origin, Evolution, and Nature of Life,"
I would surely appreciate it.

What does the "gyre" look like.?
Is it a computer algorithm.?
I read a very interesting article about a NASA scientist and his research with plasma and it's lifelike responses when electrons were excited in it.

Originally posted by tetriswoooo
cant wait for creationists come up with some bullcrap so explain how it was gods doing lol

yeah, yeah, yeah.... that's just the thing though!

Hmm... how to put this?

It is my belief that many of those who created the basis for the religions in which creationists pay homage to, wrote what they did believing that
this very theory was the correct one. It would be a lengthy case to make, but many have already, that this is undoubtedly the truth(my truth).

Due to the replication that is a construct of fractals, we are essentially a direct representation of the Universe in a conscious being. The very
construct that is the Universe, is man. There for, we are made in 'his' or 'their' image, dependent on who's take on it you want to read into.

I had started a thread, actually, my first thread on ATS... in which dove into the texts and the idea that they may be accurate, while containing no
reference to a 'Big Bang' scenario.

www.abovetopsecret.com...
Big Bang not in Creation Stories
If you are to read through my take on the subject, you may find it very enlightening to how much of this is possible(as far as the creation of the
texts go)

It is my belief and understanding that a 'Pantheistic' approach to the texts will be more enlightening than you could have ever imagined. The
accuracy in which(mainstream theories imply) the texts represent the creation of our universe and man all seemingly have a similar underlying premise
behind them. One being, water... or waters, and knowing that the universe most likely started with a hydrogen plasma with helium nuclei floating
around.... well one can replace water with hydrogen(being the main component of water((not by mass, but by ratio in atomic structure)))
I would also hint that much of Revelations is astronomy based, and also gives a quite clear description of the very geometric premise in which the
universe is a construct of.

It's only because of the roles of governance, dictation, and control that man likes to place over one another, that has lead to the mistranslations
of these texts. Also, as far as Christianity goes, I would toss out a couple books from the Canon in which were obviously created out of spite and
malice. There is a numerology application as well that can be used to clearly identify which of these texts should be removed... but that's a
different beast to tackle in itself.

Yet, there is one thing to tackle, and it's the most important part of all of this in my opinion.

If fractals are self-replicating, and this can be used to explain the very construct of life and nature as we know it. Is it not possible that the
Universe actually does create these 'Divine' beings? Which if you adhere to this theory, is actually PLAUSIBLE.

So the next time, someone says... 'God created me, God created earth', dependent on your interpretation/definition of God is, it can be an accurate
statement, even in a scientific world(implying God = Universe) Remember, the very same elements that make up the majority of the universe, are the
very same elements, that are the majority of our atomic make up. Also, the ratios become increasingly closer when talking about the atomic structure
of Earth itself.

It's funny, because I have a feeling that this question was made out of sarcasm in a way, yet is all but answered using the theory that has been
presented above. Which I don't know the entirety of, but based on what I have been able to find, it essentially is a rip off of what Nassim Haramein
had to say about the topic.

Re-read the part where it states,
"The so-called "gyromodel" depicts objects -- particles, atoms, chemicals, molecules, and cells -- as quantized packets of energy and matter that
cycle between excited and ground states around a singularity, the gyromodel's center. A singularity is itself modeled as a gyre, wholly compatible
with the thermodynamic and fractal nature of life."

"In geophysics, dynamo theory proposes a mechanism by which a celestial body such as the Earth or a star generates a magnetic field. The theory
describes the process through which a rotating, convecting, and electrically conducting fluid can maintain a magnetic field over astronomical time
scales"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's some more about Earth's dynamo, and magnetism, hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...

"The Earth's magnetic field is similar to that of a bar magnet tilted 11 degrees from the spin axis of the Earth. The problem with that picture is
that the Curie temperature of iron is about 770 C . The Earth's core is hotter than that and therefore not magnetic. So how did the Earth get its
magnetic field?
Magnetic fields surround electric currents, so we surmise that circulating electic currents in the Earth's molten metalic core are the origin of the
magnetic field. A current loop gives a field similar to that of the earth. The magnetic field magnitude measured at the surface of the Earth is about
half a Gauss and dips toward the Earth in the northern hemisphere. The magnitude varies over the surface of the Earth in the range 0.3 to 0.6
Gauss.

The Earth's magnetic field is attributed to a dynamo effect of circulating electric current, but it is not constant in direction. Rock specimens of
different age in similar locations have different directions of permanent magnetization. Evidence for 171 magnetic field reversals during the past 71
million years has been reported."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Magnetic fields are produced by electric currents, which can be macroscopic currents in wires, or microscopic currents associated with electrons in
atomic orbits. The magnetic field B is defined in terms of force on moving charge in the Lorentz force law. The interaction of magnetic field with
charge leads to many practical applications. Magnetic field sources are essentially dipolar in nature, having a north and south magnetic pole."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"For decades biologists believed the cell was essentially a “bag of solution.” With better preparation techniques and the electron microscope
biologists were able to see a huge network of filaments tubes, fibers and trabeculae inside the cell. This network of connective tissue extends
through out every nook and cranny of the body. Jim Oschman, PhD calls this the Living Matrix.
In the last decade, Gerald Pollack, PhD has discovered that 99% of our body is surrounded by structured water molecules. This liquid crystalline
structure acts as a charge carrier.
The Living Matrix together with water molecules is an energy and information network transforming and transmitting electromagnetic energy in the
structuring and regulation of 70 trillion vibrating cells."
This new vision of how the body operates profoundly alters how we understand the formation of disease and how we can heal."

There are multiple other sources, especially those in the field of biochemistry that better reiterate the point, but those can be found by a simple
google search.... that was just a bland way of putting it.

Now, combine that with existing hydrocarbons that were around during the middle of earths life ( en.wikipedia.org... ).... you
now have Electricity, Hydrogen and Carbon, as well as self replicating fractal implications as to the design of nature and the universe alike, it
would seem likely that life had all of the necessary ingredients... well those things and spacial relationships between bodies with in our planetary
system..

Also,
John 1:1 "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God."

Again either proves or reiterates that knowledge of this has been known for a while and went into the creation of the ancient texts in which are
today's religions. As it shows the interconnectedness(love that word, lol) of it all.

It's like saying, in the beginning, there was geometric structure, and the geometric structure was with/apart of the universe... which then brings us
right back into the texts, because Revelations give a pretty clear description of a crystalline/geometric structure of what all is to be, and the
lamb(life/consciousness outside of 1/no division) comes back... Implying to me that it is a cycle of sorts, or like a heartbeat rather...

so therefor it has happened before, and it will happen again

although much of this is a stretch, I'd imagine that it's close to the truth...

Again, know that I still hold the belief that it is entirely possible that the Universe itself is capable of creating(for lack of a better word) a
physical or material being such as God.

" I conclude that my theory is a comprehensive
and scientifically accurate alternative to natural selection."

"...cellular life is not chance,
but necessity—by virtue of theoretically validated natural laws and of theoretically unified phenomena
that have occurred in the evolutionary history of the universe and are occurring now, at every Cartesian
coordinate throughout the universe."

" The gyre models the living universe perfectly."

"This theory proves that the
gyre is the long-sought invisible and inevitable metaphysical element of the universe, fulfilling a
philosophical goal that dates to ancient Greece [795]."

"The Darwinian theory of evolution by natural selection does not address
how novelty emerges in the universe ..." --> note this is a very common creationist critique.

I'd like to have the patience to read the entire paper, but instead the intro + a few pages + conclusion will have to do... anytime a theory comes
along and proposes a geometry based solution to a "theory of everything" I get excited. The author makes way too many grandiose claims for me to
actually believe him... it passed peer review, so I dont know what to make of it... the question is will other scientists attempt to grasp the paper
and disprove it.

Still find it quite interesting though. I get the feeling the author was just saying that the interactions of the various gyres, between different
gyre cycles, are the explanation for phenomena that falls in between the cracks as it were, with regards to different scientific disciplines. He
seems to also believe in some kind of macro-quanta, and his use of the term singularity is not confined to meaning a black hole kind of thing. Either
that or black holes are at the center of of every point in space, effectively becoming something like god. In a lot of ways it s the DNA ization of
the universe. Its the universe as molecular biology.

"The so-called "gyromodel" depicts objects -- particles, atoms, chemicals, molecules, and cells -- as quantized packets of energy and matter
that cycle between excited and ground states around a singularity, the gyromodel's center. A singularity is itself modeled as a gyre, wholly
compatible with the thermodynamic and fractal nature of life."

And energy comes from where...?

Oh, and don't insult us with that misunderstanding of Newton's 1st Law of Thermodynamics either. Energy is not and has never been an infinite
physical presence. That "cannot be created, or destroyed" claim comes with a caveat that too many people neglect - it pertains to energy associated
with a closed mechanical system, and only to that.

Again, some genius pops off with a slice of inspiration that begins three quarters of the way down the progressive development chain and pretends that
the prior length of physical development isn't important to determine. I suppose he'll be waiting by the phone for Stockholm's call next year, and
yet he's no closer to understanding the fundamentals of physical existence than anyone else who's bumping around in some tiny bit of specialized
study. What an idiot.

Okay, so I went over the introduction and the non-technical descriptions in this guy's paper and from what I'm seeing here, he's noticed the scalable
nature of the matrixed event trajectory, and yet has no real idea what it is that he's actually noticed. He sees the redundancy that sits at the base
of physical development, and that's a good thing, but he's still married to a traditional narrative concerning material existence, and this is where
he loses the mainstream science community, because he hasn't grasped the sub-structural nature of physical existence yet. So what ends up happening is
that his attempts to illustrate his own interpretation of what he has discovered come across as convoluted and yet almost cohesive, leaving
traditional thinkers scratching their heads over why he doesn't make enough sense to completely embrace, yet he's not off track enough to completely
dismiss either.

I should call this guy. He's almost validating what I've been pushing out into the thought community for the last 3 years. Damn, if I had a pile of
letters tacked onto my last name I'd be all set, but no one pays any attention to you if you've never warmed a chair in their classroom.

I believe that the problem of how life came to be is only a problem because our (usually) materialist perspective. Even if we do not consider
ourselves materialists, the ideology is so dominant that we nevertheless characterise phenomena within its framework.

If instead we adopt an information or computation based model of reality it is clear that the orgins of life can be understood as a natural tendency
towards what Teilhard de Chardin would have called complexity, and Terence Mckenna would have called novelty. Life is therefore just a more
computationally capable program, built on the simpler computations that we call classical physics, that operates on matter. A 'hack' if you like, but
one that neither requires nor precludes a 'designer'.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.