JustSumDude wrote:<span style='font-family:tahoma'><span style='color:green'>I don't like the look of the Camaro concept at all.&nbsp; Especially the interior.&nbsp; Hideous.&nbsp; The Challenger concept is more "flashback" than "retro"... I still like it, though.&nbsp; I'd consider buying one.</span></span>

JustSumDude wrote:<span style='font-family:tahoma'><span style='color:green'>I don't like the look of the Camaro concept at all.&nbsp; Especially the interior.&nbsp; Hideous.&nbsp; The Challenger concept is more "flashback" than "retro"... I still like it, though.&nbsp; I'd consider buying one.</span></span>

JustSumDude wrote:<span style='font-family:tahoma'><span style='color:green'>I don't like the look of the Camaro concept at all.&nbsp; Especially the interior.&nbsp; Hideous.&nbsp; The Challenger concept is more "flashback" than "retro"... I still like it, though.&nbsp; I'd consider buying one.</span></span>

What's the difference between retro and "flashback"?

Not bein a dikhed, it just seems like the same thing to me.

<span style='font-family:tahoma'><span style='color:green'>That's because, technically, it is the same thing. The Challenger bears a much stronger resemblance to the classic pony car designs of the sixties than any previous model "rebirths"... so I used what I felt was a stronger adjective, that's all.</span></span>

JustSumDude wrote:<span style='font-family:tahoma'><span style='color:green'>I don't like the look of the Camaro concept at all.&nbsp; Especially the interior.&nbsp; Hideous.&nbsp; The Challenger concept is more "flashback" than "retro"... I still like it, though.&nbsp; I'd consider buying one.</span></span>

What's the difference between retro and "flashback"?

Not bein a dikhed, it just seems like the same thing to me.

I would actually equate it to this:
Flashback - within recent memory with little or no change.
Retro - older style with improvements to original design.