RAPS.org needs your explicit consent to store browser cookies. If you don't allow cookies, you may not be able to use certain features of the web site such as personalized content. Please see our Privacy Policy for more information.

About the Regulatory Profession

The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.

Regulatory Code of Ethics

One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.

Regulatory Competency Framework

Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.

Regulatory Convergence

Join the brightest minds in regulatory at the annual Regulatory Convergence. See the global regulatory community in action. Intensive workshops. Topical sessions. Meet ups with regulators. This is where it all comes together.

New: Take the RAC Exam Online

The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move
across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level
menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab
will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.

The regulatory function is vital in making safe and effective healthcare products available worldwide. Individuals who ensure regulatory compliance and prepare submissions, as well as those whose main job function is clinical affairs or quality assurance are all considered regulatory professionals.

One of our most valuable contributions to the profession is the Regulatory Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics provides regulatory professionals with core values that hold them to the highest standards of professional conduct.

Like all professions, regulatory is based on a shared set of competencies. The Regulatory Competency Framework describes the essential elements of what is required of regulatory professionals at four major career and professional levels.

Join the brightest minds in regulatory at the annual Regulatory Convergence. See the global regulatory community in action. Intensive workshops. Topical sessions. Meet ups with regulators. This is where it all comes together.

RAPS is closely monitoring developments in the Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. See our public safety page for the latest updates.

The RAPS store will be under maintenance Saturday, 13 June between 6 AM and 12 PM EST. Store functionality may be unavailable at times during this window.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused during this time.

FDA Urges Caution in Use of Robotic Surgical Devices for Cancer-Related Procedures

Patients and health care providers should know that the safety and effectiveness of robotically-assisted surgical devices for the prevention or treatment of cancer has not been established for use in the US, a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety communication warned on Thursday.

The safety communication urges caution when using robotically-assisted surgical devices for mastectomy and any other cancer-related surgery, citing the lack of FDA evaluation on use of the technology for the specified indications. There are currently no FDA approvals or clearances for use of any robotically-assisted surgical devices for the prevention or treatment of cancer in the US, the agency warned.

In addition, the benefits and risks of oncological surgery procedures using the device type relative to conventional approaches have not been established either. Yet the agency pointed to “scientific literature and media publications describing surgeons and hospital systems that use robotically-assisted surgical devices for mastectomy.” An article published last November in the New England Journal of Medicine reported results of a trial in which certain patients with cervical cancer had been assigned to undergo robotic-assisted surgery, FDA noted.

The agency said it is monitoring adverse events in literature and those reported to FDA to enrich its understanding of the benefit-risk profile of robotically-assisted surgical devices for specific indications. It recommended that providers train for specific robotically-assisted surgical device procedures and discuss this experience and expected clinical outcomes with patients, among other recommendations issued for both patients and providers.

“We want doctors and patients to be aware of the lack of evidence of safety and effectiveness for these uses so they can make better informed decisions about their cancer treatment and care,” said Terri Cornelison, assistant director for women’s health at FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health.