Tor

Tor is an encrypted anonymising network that makes it harder to intercept internet communications, or see where communications are coming from or going to.

In order to use the WikiLeaks public submission system as detailed above you can download the Tor Browser Bundle, which is a Firefox-like browser available for Windows, Mac OS X and GNU/Linux and pre-configured to connect using the anonymising system Tor.

Tails

If you are at high risk and you have the capacity to do so, you can also access the submission system through a secure operating system called Tails. Tails is an operating system launched from a USB stick or a DVD that aim to leaves no traces when the computer is shut down after use and automatically routes your internet traffic through Tor. Tails will require you to have either a USB stick or a DVD at least 4GB big and a laptop or desktop computer.

Tips

Our submission system works hard to preserve your anonymity, but we recommend you also take some of your own precautions. Please review these basic guidelines.

1. Contact us if you have specific problems

If you have a very large submission, or a submission with a complex format, or are a high-risk source, please contact us. In our experience it is always possible to find a custom solution for even the most seemingly difficult situations.

2. What computer to use

If the computer you are uploading from could subsequently be audited in an investigation, consider using a computer that is not easily tied to you. Technical users can also use Tails to help ensure you do not leave any records of your submission on the computer.

3. Do not talk about your submission to others

If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks. We are the global experts in source protection – it is a complex field. Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly. This includes other media organisations.

After

1. Do not talk about your submission to others

If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks. We are the global experts in source protection – it is a complex field. Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly. This includes other media organisations.

2. Act normal

If you are a high-risk source, avoid saying anything or doing anything after submitting which might promote suspicion. In particular, you should try to stick to your normal routine and behaviour.

3. Remove traces of your submission

If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an investigation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used.

In particular, hard drives retain data after formatting which may be visible to a digital forensics team and flash media (USB sticks, memory cards and SSD drives) retain data even after a secure erasure. If you used flash media to store sensitive data, it is important to destroy the media.

If you do this and are a high-risk source you should make sure there are no traces of the clean-up, since such traces themselves may draw suspicion.

4. If you face legal action

If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you. The Courage Foundation is an international organisation dedicated to the protection of journalistic sources. You can find more details at https://www.couragefound.org.

Submit documents to WikiLeaks

WikiLeaks publishes documents of political or historical importance that are censored or otherwise suppressed. We specialise in strategic global publishing and large archives.

The following is the address of our secure site where you can anonymously upload your documents to WikiLeaks editors. You can only access this submissions system through Tor. (See our Tor tab for more information.) We also advise you to read our tips for sources before submitting.

wlupld3ptjvsgwqw.onion

Copy this address into your Tor browser. Advanced users, if they wish, can also add a further layer of encryption to their submission using our public PGP key.

If you cannot use Tor, or your submission is very large, or you have specific requirements, WikiLeaks provides several alternative methods. Contact us to discuss how to proceed.

1. (C) Summary: U.N. human rights envoy Pinheiro has kicked
off an ambitious week in Burma during which he hopes to
secure: the release of ASSK and all NLD members detained
since the May 30 attack; an agreement to conduct an
assessment of the attack; the reopening of political party
offices; amnesty for all remaining political prisoners; and
movement on an assessment mission on the military rapes in
Shan State. Pinheiro is frustrated by the "linguistic
contortions" of a government that has been uncooperative and
by a regime that is responsible for a particularly egregious
year of human rights abuses. Nonetheless, the human rights
envoy is determined to press ahead. We admire his tenacity,
but there are no signs the regime intends to make any
concessions in the short term. End Summary.
2. (SBU) UNCHR Human Rights Special Rapporteur Paulo Sergio
Pinheiro called on the Chief of Mission on November 3 at the
beginning of a week-long mission to Burma. Pinheiro's
current visit to Burma is his first since he cut short an
investigative mission in March upon discovering an electronic
listening device during a "confidential" interview with a
political prisoner. Pinheiro was accompanied by two
Geneva-based UNCHR Associate Human Rights Officers, Hulan
Tsedev and Federila Donati.
SIPDIS
3. (C) Pinheiro said that he had hoped to make a longer visit
to Burma in order to collect appropriate information for his
next report to the U.N. Commission on Human Rights, due on
November 12. Despite the short window of opportunity
provided by the regime, the human rights envoy said he had a
full schedule that included meetings with Prime Minister
General Khin Nyunt, Minister of Home Affairs Col. Tin Hlaing,
SPDC Secretary-2 Lt-Gen Thein Sein, and Deputy Foreign
Minister U Khin Maung Win. Pinheiro said he would visit
political prisoners and had also requested meetings with Aung
San Suu Kyi (ASSK) and other members of the NLD Central
Executive Committee under house arrest in Rangoon. (Note:
Pinheiro will probably not see U Tin Oo, who is imprisoned in
remote Sagaing Division, or U Lwin, whom the SPDC allowed to
travel to Mandalay on October 31 to see his dying son, who
passed away on November 1. End note).
4. (C) Pinheiro said that during his past missions to Burma
he had been frustrated by "ritual" meetings with the GOB that
lacked any real substance. As a result, for his current
visit he had provided the GOB with advance talking points
which he hoped would generate a genuine dialogue, if not
concessions on the part of the regime. His ambitious goals
for the current mission include: the immediate release of all
those arrested or deprived of liberty in connection with the
May 30 incident; an agreement on his proposal to conduct an
assessment of the May 30 attack; the opening and reopening of
all political party offices; consideration of the modalities
for the amnesty of all remaining political prisoners; an
agreement on the modalities and the timing of a Shan State
(military rapes) assessment; and for the regime to reaffirm
its commitment to establish a National Human Rights
Institution according to the Paris Principles.
5. (C) The human rights envoy said he was also extremely
frustrated by the regime's inability to offer any compromises
or to implement any of his many recommendations. "I can't
continue like this," said Pinheiro, adding that he had
previously recommended to the regime, without success, the
immediate and unconditional release of all political
prisoners, a cessation of arbitrary arrests, the lifting of
restrictions on the political parties, and various
legislative and judicial reforms. He said the regime's
description of ASSK's five-month prison detention and house
arrest as "protective custody" was simply another example of
"linguistic contortions" that underscored the SPDC's
inability to adopt international norms with regard to human
rights.
6. (C) In response to Pinheiro's inquiry about USG
expectations, we said that new sanctions were indicative of
U.S. sentiment toward the regime. Although Washington might
publicly welcome the release of ASSK and the rest of the NLD
leadership, the U.S. would continue to press hard for the
release of all political prisoners and would, absent concrete
steps toward a transition to democracy, maintain sanctions.
We also shared with Pinheiro and his delegation our views on
the current human rights situation, drawing the U.N. team's
attention to forced participation in USDA mass rallies to
support the regime's "roadmap to democracy;" pressure on
civil servants and citizens to join newly created people's
militia; and the arrest and detention of NLD supporters who
provided logistical support for ASSK's 2002-2003 upcountry
travels. We provided Pinheiro with a sanitized report of the
May 30 attack and photographs of the attack site and injuries
sustained by eye-witnesses.
7. (C) Comment: Pinheiro, though frustrated, expressed
determination to fulfill his mandate and undertake all
possible measures to improve Burma's deplorable human rights
situation. He admitted that it has been a "very bad year"
for human rights abuses and he was visibly moved when he
described his encounters with victims and eye-witnesses to
the May 30 premeditated assault on ASSK and her convoy. We
are supportive of his creative approach in giving the GOB
something to chew on before he meets with senior officials
this week. However, we do not expect the regime to be very
forthcoming on any of his fundamental objectives. End
comment.
Martinez

Raw content

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 001410
SIPDIS
STATE ALSO FOR EAP/BCLTV; TREASURY FOR OASIA JEFF NEIL;
USPACOM FOR FPA
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/03/2013
TAGS: PHUM, PREL, PGOV, BM, Human Rights
SUBJECT: BURMA: PINHEIRO FRUSTRATED, BUT DETERMINED TO
ADDRESS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
Classified By: COM Carmen Martinez for Reasons 1.5 (B,D)
1. (C) Summary: U.N. human rights envoy Pinheiro has kicked
off an ambitious week in Burma during which he hopes to
secure: the release of ASSK and all NLD members detained
since the May 30 attack; an agreement to conduct an
assessment of the attack; the reopening of political party
offices; amnesty for all remaining political prisoners; and
movement on an assessment mission on the military rapes in
Shan State. Pinheiro is frustrated by the "linguistic
contortions" of a government that has been uncooperative and
by a regime that is responsible for a particularly egregious
year of human rights abuses. Nonetheless, the human rights
envoy is determined to press ahead. We admire his tenacity,
but there are no signs the regime intends to make any
concessions in the short term. End Summary.
2. (SBU) UNCHR Human Rights Special Rapporteur Paulo Sergio
Pinheiro called on the Chief of Mission on November 3 at the
beginning of a week-long mission to Burma. Pinheiro's
current visit to Burma is his first since he cut short an
investigative mission in March upon discovering an electronic
listening device during a "confidential" interview with a
political prisoner. Pinheiro was accompanied by two
Geneva-based UNCHR Associate Human Rights Officers, Hulan
Tsedev and Federila Donati.
SIPDIS
3. (C) Pinheiro said that he had hoped to make a longer visit
to Burma in order to collect appropriate information for his
next report to the U.N. Commission on Human Rights, due on
November 12. Despite the short window of opportunity
provided by the regime, the human rights envoy said he had a
full schedule that included meetings with Prime Minister
General Khin Nyunt, Minister of Home Affairs Col. Tin Hlaing,
SPDC Secretary-2 Lt-Gen Thein Sein, and Deputy Foreign
Minister U Khin Maung Win. Pinheiro said he would visit
political prisoners and had also requested meetings with Aung
San Suu Kyi (ASSK) and other members of the NLD Central
Executive Committee under house arrest in Rangoon. (Note:
Pinheiro will probably not see U Tin Oo, who is imprisoned in
remote Sagaing Division, or U Lwin, whom the SPDC allowed to
travel to Mandalay on October 31 to see his dying son, who
passed away on November 1. End note).
4. (C) Pinheiro said that during his past missions to Burma
he had been frustrated by "ritual" meetings with the GOB that
lacked any real substance. As a result, for his current
visit he had provided the GOB with advance talking points
which he hoped would generate a genuine dialogue, if not
concessions on the part of the regime. His ambitious goals
for the current mission include: the immediate release of all
those arrested or deprived of liberty in connection with the
May 30 incident; an agreement on his proposal to conduct an
assessment of the May 30 attack; the opening and reopening of
all political party offices; consideration of the modalities
for the amnesty of all remaining political prisoners; an
agreement on the modalities and the timing of a Shan State
(military rapes) assessment; and for the regime to reaffirm
its commitment to establish a National Human Rights
Institution according to the Paris Principles.
5. (C) The human rights envoy said he was also extremely
frustrated by the regime's inability to offer any compromises
or to implement any of his many recommendations. "I can't
continue like this," said Pinheiro, adding that he had
previously recommended to the regime, without success, the
immediate and unconditional release of all political
prisoners, a cessation of arbitrary arrests, the lifting of
restrictions on the political parties, and various
legislative and judicial reforms. He said the regime's
description of ASSK's five-month prison detention and house
arrest as "protective custody" was simply another example of
"linguistic contortions" that underscored the SPDC's
inability to adopt international norms with regard to human
rights.
6. (C) In response to Pinheiro's inquiry about USG
expectations, we said that new sanctions were indicative of
U.S. sentiment toward the regime. Although Washington might
publicly welcome the release of ASSK and the rest of the NLD
leadership, the U.S. would continue to press hard for the
release of all political prisoners and would, absent concrete
steps toward a transition to democracy, maintain sanctions.
We also shared with Pinheiro and his delegation our views on
the current human rights situation, drawing the U.N. team's
attention to forced participation in USDA mass rallies to
support the regime's "roadmap to democracy;" pressure on
civil servants and citizens to join newly created people's
militia; and the arrest and detention of NLD supporters who
provided logistical support for ASSK's 2002-2003 upcountry
travels. We provided Pinheiro with a sanitized report of the
May 30 attack and photographs of the attack site and injuries
sustained by eye-witnesses.
7. (C) Comment: Pinheiro, though frustrated, expressed
determination to fulfill his mandate and undertake all
possible measures to improve Burma's deplorable human rights
situation. He admitted that it has been a "very bad year"
for human rights abuses and he was visibly moved when he
described his encounters with victims and eye-witnesses to
the May 30 premeditated assault on ASSK and her convoy. We
are supportive of his creative approach in giving the GOB
something to chew on before he meets with senior officials
this week. However, we do not expect the regime to be very
forthcoming on any of his fundamental objectives. End
comment.
Martinez

Metadata

This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

Print

You can use this tool to generate a print-friendly PDF of the document 03RANGOON1410_a.

Include summaryInclude headersInclude raw metadata

Share

The formal reference of this document is 03RANGOON1410_a, please use it for anything written about this document. This will permit you and others to search for it.

Direct link to documentReddit codeHTML codeForum code (bbcode)

Submit this story

Help Expand The Public Library of US Diplomacy

Your role is important:
WikiLeaks maintains its robust independence through your contributions.