Tobacco Policy Reform Group Asks Gottlieb for a National Summit on Vaping Regulation

The FDA seems dead set on restricting the vapor industry very soon. The agency gave JUUL Labs and the four major tobacco companies that also sell vapor products 60 days to submit plans to eliminate sales to teenagers. That 60-day deadline expires soon after next week’s elections.

Now a group of influential academics and tobacco control and public health experts is trying to convince the agency to slow down and consider the risks of hasty regulation. The National Tobacco Reform Initiative (NTRI) has sent a letter to Scott Gottlieb, calling on the FDA commissioner to hold a summit of stakeholders to discuss FDA’s policy on vapor products and vaping.

“To fully address the situation will require the involvement and support of not only FDA, but other stakeholders as well,” NTRI coordinator Allan Erickson wrote to Gottlieb. Erickson is a former American Cancer Society vice president, who now thinks e-cigarettes can play a part in tobacco control efforts to reduce smoking.

“We therefore wish to recommend that the FDA/CTP sponsor a national dialogue related to youth use of tobacco and nicotine products as well as the need to provide the 30 million adult smokers in this country with lower risk alternative tobacco and nicotine products, to be held sometime in early 2019,” wrote Erickson.

NTRI seems to recognize that tobacco control has lost its way and abandoned its core mission.

Of course, whether the FDA has any real interest in balancing those goals is questionable. Gottlieb has already said that eliminating youth use will likely require restricting adult choices. He has specifically mentioned eliminating non-tobacco flavors and online sales as likely targets for the agency. The FDA is already in the process of creating rules for e-liquid flavors.

The low-key National Tobacco Reform Initiative is mostly made up of respected people from tobacco control and academia who advocate for vaping (and other low-risk nicotine products like snus) to play a role in reducing the damage caused by combustible cigarettes. NTRI seems to recognize that tobacco control has lost its way and abandoned its core mission.

The NTRI leadership includes David Abrams and Ray Niaura of New York University (and both formerly with the Truth Initiative), former American Heart Association vice president Scott Ballin, and former American Cancer Society president John Seffrin. The organization’s advisory group includes Clive Bates and Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller. Miller was one of the state attorneys general who sued the tobacco companies, leading to the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement. He was also chair of the Truth Initiative board until last year.

The NTRI letter may be too late to affect Gottlieb’s thinking. He’s shown no signs of cooling his reckless “epidemic” rhetoric.

The new letter to Gottlieb refers to the previous one, and asks that the agency not put the lives of smokers second to fear of a youth “epidemic” when crafting regulations.

“In our letter to you this past July, we raised concerns that this second priority is seemingly taking a back seat as the agency shifted resources to dealing with the e‐cigarette and adolescent issue,” says the new communication to FDA Commissioner Gottlieb. “We believe that the issue of youth use of e‐cigarettes as well as addressing the needs of the 30 million smokers can and should go forward in tandem.”

The NTRI letter may be too late to affect Gottlieb’s thinking. He’s shown no signs of cooling his reckless “epidemic” rhetoric. There’s nothing the FDA commissioner needs more now than wisdom from clear-headed and open-minded veterans of the tobacco wars. But he appears less and less likely to listen.

Smokers created vaping without any help from the tobacco industry or anti-smoking crusaders, and vapers have the right to keep innovating to help themselves. My goal is to provide clear, honest information about the challenges vaping faces from lawmakers, regulators, and brokers of disinformation. I recently joined the CASAA board, but my opinions aren’t necessarily CASAA’s, and vice versa. You can find me on Twitter @whycherrywhy

6comments

I was just talking to some people at work about this so i dont have twitter but someone should tweet scott this…… Kids are not vaping just because it taste good there is something underlying that makes kids vape maybe they are extremely stressed out, over worked etc You have to get to the root of the cause to actually make a change just banning flavors is the easy way out. Do more for the youth and actually help them.

Yeah, probably true. However, people have *always* been stressed out and used drugs, and kids have *always* wanted to do things that adults do. But that doesn’t matter, because all the FDA can do is regulate products.

Very interesting. Anything the FDA does will only harm adults. I can say 100% if they ban flavors adults will use the tobacco flavors because the alternative is cigarettes and us vape guys know how much better you feel when vaping vs smoking but the kids will be putting kool aid powder into it to make it taste better. I would really like to know how much money has big tobacco put into the pockets of the FDA or even Scott personally it seems any rational human would realize kids will always do stupid crap and its up to the parents and schools to do something about it not the FDA banning flavors. Its like the FDA is trying to make up for bad parenting.

Scott’s more of a pharma guy. As for the FDA, the Center for Tobacco Products — the part of the agency that regulates tobacco, and sets the research agenda for all the NIH “tobacco science” grants — is 100% funded by “tobacco user fees,” which is cash paid to the FDA by tobacco companies. The FDA runs on cigarette sales.