i think i'm usually somewhere in the middle, but then I realise if I was being logical I would never have moved to London, started drinking, spent a lot of the last few years watching bands play at volumes that has caused me actual physical harm, spent money releasing music for other people, engaged in relationships with people who lived often hours away, be planning a month away on my own etc etc. none of that is logical, but i'll be damned i would change any of it.

well... maybe some of it, but then again it's all the sum of what i am isn't it?

gosh, that was way too serious, wasn't it? here's a picture of chewbacca as recompense:

Logic and emotion are not diametrically opposed. Further, they are not mutually exclusive.

A question of "logic versus emotion" is posed because of the modern assumed definition of "emotional"; that is, liable to excessive emotions. What was once over-emotional is now synonymous with emotional. Also, forced emotions have become the norm, contradicting the definition of emotion, that is, emotion is, intrinsically, instinctive.

If one considers the true definition of emotion then the intsinctive nature of emotion doesn't preclude logic because one's instinct is a product of one's experiences as well as nature. For example, a fear will be based on understanding and, so, logic.

Therefore, the question of logic versus emotion can be posed only if one succumbs to a modern incorrect definition of emotion drawn from social-worker government and Trisha.