but my God, St. Louis passing on the defender of Landry's ilk is what I want people to talk about

Oh that makes a lot of sense.

He s their number 1 receiver no doubt but the fact that they signed Bennett should indicate to anyone with a modicum of sense that they are going towards a more balanced passing attack. Thus s possesion receiver in the draft makes sense but as per usual any indication that we might have the oppurtunity to draft a RB or S on day 1 just means summer sticks his head farther and farther into the sand.

He s their number 1 receiver no doubt but the fact that they signed Bennett should indicate to anyone with a modicum of sense that they are going towards a more balanced passing attack. Thus s possesion receiver in the draft makes sense but as per usual any indication that we might have the oppurtunity to draft a RB or S on day 1 just means summer sticks his head farther and farther into the sand.

I don't know what this has to do w/ me not wanting a S and RB on the 1st day, many people believe Landry is a top 10 pick, I just don't see St. Louis sacrificing the chance to draft an impact player for their D, for a possession receiver

I don't know what this has to do w/ me not wanting a S and RB on the 1st day, many people believe Landry is a top 10 pick, I just don't see St. Louis sacrificing the chance to draft an impact player for their D, for a possession receiver

Sometimes i wonder if you are truly feigning density or if it is real.

In any situation where a safety or RB prospect is proposed to fall to us you do your best to shoot it down. Its a trend.

You dont even use correct logic. What would have made sense is that with Holt, Bruce and Bennet under contract they dont need another receiver.

Regardless I still would see you being mad if Landry did fall to us and we picked him up.

Sometimes i wonder if you are truly feigning density or if it is real.

In any situation where a safety or RB prospect is proposed to fall to us you do your best to shoot it down. Its a trend.

You dont even use correct logic. What would have made sense is that with Holt, Bruce and Bennet under contract they dont need another receiver.

Regardless I still would see you being mad if Landry did fall to us and we picked him up.

I wouldn't be mad at all if a top 10 pick fell to us at 22, not at all, I just don't see Landry dropping all the way to 22 when Donte Whitner, a lesser prospect, went #8 or #9 overall last year, Landry can do so much, he can patrol CF, and he can cover the slot receiver, a perfect pick for St. Louis

but can I have a preference for who I want to take in the 1st? please, can I? good Gawd