My Name is Paul H Cosentino. I started this Blog in 2011 because of what I believe to be wrongdoings in town government. This Blog is to keep the citizens of Templeton informed. It is also for the citizens of Templeton to post their comments and concerns.

EPA Urged to Ban Brain Toxin by Dr. Mercola

Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is
among a coalition of environmental, medical and health groups urging the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to ban the addition of
fluoride to public drinking water supplies.

The EPA has been served with a petition that includes more than 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing the risks of water fluoridation to human health.

In particular, the petition notes, “the amount of fluoride now
regularly consumed by millions of Americans in fluoridated areas exceeds
the doses repeatedly linked to IQ loss and other neurotoxic effects.”

The EPA is authorized, under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
to prohibit the use of a chemical that poses an unreasonable risk to the
general public or particularly vulnerable populations.

The petition urges the EPA to exert their authority to prohibit
fluoridation additives in drinking water, noting that their own
Guidelines for Neurotoxicity Risk Assessment shows:1

Neurotoxicity is a hazard of fluoride exposure

The reference dose that would reasonably protect against
neurotoxicity is “incompatible with the doses now ingested by millions
of Americans in fluoridated areas”

“In fact,” the petition states, “the amount of fluoride now regularly
consumed by many people in fluoridated areas exceeds the doses
repeatedly linked to IQ loss and other neurotoxic effects; with certain
subpopulations standing at elevated risk of harm, including infants,
young children, elderly populations and those with dietary deficiencies,
renal impairment and/or genetic predispositions.”2
As for fluoride’s effects on the brain, in 2014 Lancet Neurology
released a study, authored by a Harvard doctor, among others, that
classified fluoride as a developmental neurotoxin.3 It wasn’t the first time.

In 2012, a meta-analysis, also by Harvard researchers, clearly showed
that children exposed to fluoride in drinking water had lower IQs, by
an average of seven points, in areas with raised concentrations.4

Fluoride Warrants Assessment Priority, Per EPA’s ‘Gold Standard’

Fluoride’s neurotoxicity is an especially unreasonable risk, the
petition notes, because fluoride’s predominant effect on tooth decay is
related to topical application, not oral ingestion:5

“Since there is little benefit in swallowing
fluoride, there is little justification in exposing the public to any
risk of fluoride neurotoxicity, particularly via a source as essential
to human sustenance as the public drinking water and the many processed
foods and beverages made therefrom.”

Even the National Research Council reviewed the evidence, at the
EPA’s request, and concluded in 2006 that fluoride has the ability to
interfere with brain function.

Nearly 200 fluoride/brain studies have been conducted since, and
research published in Lancet Neurology classified fluoride as one of 12
chemicals known to cause developmental neurotoxicity in humans (others
include lead, mercury and PBCs).6

Chemicals known to be neurotoxic in humans are classified by the EPA
as “gold standard” chemicals that should receive assessment priority.

“The existence of so many human studies on fluoride neurotoxicity
highlights the urgent need for a diligent risk assessment, per EPA’s
Guidelines, to ensure that the general public, and sensitive
subpopulations, are not ingesting neurotoxic levels,” the petition
explains.7

Even Low Doses of Fluoride May Be Toxic

Fluoride has repeatedly been linked to reduced IQ even at supposedly
“safe” water fluoride levels of less than 4 mg/L (EPA’s “safe” level).

It’s often stated, and assumed by health agencies including the EPA,
that dental fluorosis, a condition in which your tooth enamel becomes
progressively discolored and mottled, is one of the most significant
adverse effects of consuming too much fluoride.

But in reality, this is an outward sign that fluoride is damaging the
body. Research has found impairment in cognitive abilities among
children with fluorosis (even mild fluorosis) compared to children with
no fluorosis.

Also noteworthy, reduced IQ has been seen in study participants with
higher urinary fluoride concentrations, even when no dental fluorosis
was present, which suggests that the doses of fluoride that impair
cognitive ability are lower than those that cause severe dental
fluorosis.8

The petition highlighted several other studies that also demonstrated
“fluoride’s ability to cause neurotoxic effects at low levels,”
including one that found just 0.5 uM of fluoride (.009 mg/L) caused
lipid peroxidation after 48 hours of exposure.

“Most individuals living in fluoridated areas in the United States
have fluoride levels in their blood that exceed this level,” they wrote.

Did You Know That Most of Western Europe Has Rejected Water Fluoridation?

The vast majority (97 percent) of Western Europe has rejected water
fluoridation. In fact, most countries fluoridate neither their water nor
their salt, but according to the World Health Organization (WHO), tooth
decay in 12-year-olds is coming down as fast, if not faster, in
non-fluoridated countries as it is in fluoridated countries.9
In contrast, in the U.S. 200 million Americans live in areas where
water is fluoridated. From city to city, debates over whether to start
or end water fluoridation rage on, including in Cortland, New York.
Earlier this year, city officials had planned to hold a public
hearing to consider state grants to study adding fluoride to its water
supply, but they’ve since backed away from the idea, in part because
residents expressed concern that water fluoridation amounts to mediating
the public without consent.10

In the video above, the city of Cortland hosted a forum to discuss the health effects of water fluoridation.

FAN’s senior adviser, Paul Connett, Ph.D., and director Bill
Osmunson, debated two pro-fluoridation dentists — Johnny Johnson and
Steven Slott — during the forum. According to FAN (although you can
watch for yourself in the video):11

“They’re both notorious for posting
thousands of pro-fluoridation comments on anything fluoride-related on
the internet. Meanwhile, in person they were less than impressive,
unable to cite even a single primary study proving fluoridation’s safety
or effectiveness.”

10 Million in India at Risk of Disability From High-Fluoride Water

If there were any doubt about fluoride’s toxicity, one need only look
at what happens when people are exposed to high levels of naturally
occurring fluoride in their drinking water. Fluoride is naturally
occurring in some areas, leading to high levels in certain water
supplies “naturally.”

Fluoridation advocates often use this to support its safety; however,
naturally occurring substances are not automatically safe (think of
arsenic, for instance).

Data from India’s Union Health and Family Welfare Ministry indicate
that nearly 49 million people are living in areas where fluoride levels
in water are above the permissible levels. Exposure to levels above 10
mg/L may cause crippling skeletal fluorosis, as well as abdominal pain,
nausea, vomiting, seizures and muscle spasms.

It’s estimated that more than 10 million people in the area are at risk of disability due to high fluoride levels in the water.12
When levels in water are too high, the fluoride accumulates in bones,
replacing calcium. In the early stages of skeletal fluorosis, pain
occurs followed by changes to the bone structure that can hinder
movement. It most often affects hands, legs, arms and the back.

Skeletal fluorosis goes through three stages, which makes sense since
fluoride is a cumulative toxin. The more exposure you get, and the
longer you get it, the worse your symptoms are likely to be. According
to FAN, symptoms of early stage skeletal fluorosis include:

Prevention and Education Are Needed to Prevent Cavities

Recommendations released by the University of Calgary School of
Public Policy championed the use of prevention and education to prevent
early childhood cavities, noting water fluoridation wouldn’t be needed
if such measures were effectively practiced.

The paper’s authors even pointed out that water fluoridation
is not preventing tooth decay, as areas with water fluoridation still
have a high rate of early childhood cavities. The recommendations call
for increased education for parents on the importance of proper feeding
and dental hygiene for infants, as well as for health care professionals
to discuss these issues with patients. Co-author Jennifer Zwicker told
660 News:13

“We’re recommending that at baby visits … and any
kind of interface with public health nurses or pediatricians, just
explaining to parents, you need to be cleaning their gums, you need to
be brushing their teeth, just so you’re not ending up with children
going to the emergency room needing surgery for dental pain.”

In the U.S., meanwhile, the petition urges the EPA to follow the lead
of western Europe and reject water fluoridation. “The EPA is the one
federal agency with the authority to make this happen here in the U.S.
We urge EPA to act accordingly,” they wrote.14 …

1 comment:

Fluoride is a poison. Fluoride was poison yesterday. Fluoride is poison today. Fluoride will be poison tomorrow. Fluoride is safe and effective for killing rats and insects. Here is the question our Board of Health and Public Schools (who both prostitute for fluoride) should be asking themselves:

The Question to promoters of fluoridation:

“What primary scientific studies (not bogus reviews conducted by pro-fluoridation agencies) can you cite that gives you the confidence to ignore or dismiss the evidence that fluoride damages the brain as documented in over 300 animal and human studies (including 50 IQ studies).”

If proponents cannot provide an adequate scientific answer to this question: fluoridation should be halted immediately.

On Nov 22, 2016, Michael Connett, JD, asked this question to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), on behalf of FAN, Food & Water Watch, Organic Consumers Association, American Academy of Environmental Medicine, International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology, Moms Against Fluoridation, and several individual mothers, in a petition calling on the EPA to ban the deliberate addition of fluoridating chemicals to the drinking water under provisions in the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The EPA has 90 days to reply, and if they fail to provide a satisfactory reply then they can be taken to Federal Court.

Like so many other things in our lives we have been lied to when it comes to water fluoridation. One of the big reasons we believe all the lies is because in many cases our jobs depend on us believing these lies. When in doubt, get it out.