Sport

Preston v Clarets: Dyche aiming to up Burnley's ante

THE Clarets will step-up their pre-season campaign tonight as they face Preston in the second of three successive Lancashire derbies.

After a gruelling week of fitness work in Austria Sean Dyche’s squad are now looking to get their match sharpness up with some tougher tests than the one offered by FC Grossklein during the warm weather camp.

On Saturday a Clarets outfit featuring several youngsters travelled down the M65 to face Accrington at the Store First Stadium, coming away with a 1-0 victory in sweltering temperatures.

And tonight they head to Deepdale to face a Preston side that narrowly missed out on promotion from League One last season, losing in the play-off semi-finals.

It will be the toughest test of pre-season so far for Burnley, who complete the Lancashire derby hat-trick with a trip to Bloomfield Road to face Blackpool on Saturday.

Several first-team players who missed out on Saturday could return at Deepdale.

The absence of Tom Heaton, Steven Reid, Michael Kightly and Ashley Barnes was purely precautionary according to Dyche, and the four have been in training.

But the boss could give further chances to some of the younger members of the squad.

“I know about our group, but there is a learning curve for the younger players,” he said.

“We are looking to build a squad, of course, and we are actively in the market for a couple of fresh faces, but this is an invaluable experience for them.

“There is still a big gap, but they have to fill that void and understand the demands they have to place on themselves to get up to first team level.

“The bar has been raised and you are no longer looking to jump into a team that is looking to do well in the Championship; you are looking at a team trying to do well in the Premier League.”

Related links

Heaton, who started every league game last season, has yet to feature in pre-season, but if he is given the chance he will be keen to impress after Matt Gilks kept a clean sheet on Saturday, making a fine save from Josh Windass early in the game.

Gilks has already spoken of his desire to keep his place in the Scotland squad and battle Heaton for the number one jersey, and it is now up to the former Cardiff stopper to rise to the challenge.

Further up the pitch the battle to partner Danny Ings up front will continue. With Sam Vokes continuing his recuperation from a cruciate knee ligament injury, Barnes, Lukas Jutkiewicz and Marvin Sordell are all in contention to start alongside last season’s top scorer when the Premier League season kicks-off on August 18.

All three of them bagged a brace in the 8-0 win in Austria, but it was young striker Jason Gilchrist who struck the winning goal on Saturday.

Ex-Bolton striker Sordell started in attack alongside Ings, with Jutkiewicz coming off the bench, and he could be in line for a start at Deepdale, with Barnes also back in contention.

Comments (34)

Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!RobH2O .

RobH2O . wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' what language is that. schools = education = good english

[quote][p][bold]RobH2O .[/bold] wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary![/p][/quote]''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' what language is that. schools = education = good englishKeen O to Get Kean Out

RobH2O . wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable

[quote][p][bold]RobH2O .[/bold] wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary![/p][/quote]regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viablehasslem hasslem

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley wrote:
We have no option but to up the anti after the dross on display at Accy. If it were me I wouldn't make Jukes loan permanent, he's not good enough.

I think you maybe went to the toilet halfway the that and forgot to join the beginning to an ending. Tha display at acct was OK but now Burnley need to........ Please don't try again my brain is confused every time you post. But PNE is up a gear, no slip ups please and I also think a BRFC friendly would be impossible but both clubs are doing a lot for Lancashire football this season with their friendly programme.

[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
We have no option but to up the anti after the dross on display at Accy. If it were me I wouldn't make Jukes loan permanent, he's not good enough.[/p][/quote]I think you maybe went to the toilet halfway the that and forgot to join the beginning to an ending. Tha display at acct was OK but now Burnley need to........ Please don't try again my brain is confused every time you post. But PNE is up a gear, no slip ups please and I also think a BRFC friendly would be impossible but both clubs are doing a lot for Lancashire football this season with their friendly programme.Claretcert

RobH2O . wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' what language is that. schools = education = good english

Where to start?

You missed a comma or a full stop off the end of the quoted sentence.

Surely a question deserves a question mark?

You missed a capital letter on the word Schools.

You missed a full stop at the end of your sentence.

CORRECTION FAIL - You managed to make four basic elementary grammatical errors in a sentence that was less than two lines long. To make it even funnier, the sentence in question was pointing out someone else's perceived errors.

Congratulations Keano - yew trewly arr a dik.

[quote][p][bold]Keen O to Get Kean Out[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O .[/bold] wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary![/p][/quote]''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' what language is that. schools = education = good english[/p][/quote]Where to start?
You missed a comma or a full stop off the end of the quoted sentence.
Surely a question deserves a question mark?
You missed a capital letter on the word Schools.
You missed a full stop at the end of your sentence.
CORRECTION FAIL - You managed to make four basic elementary grammatical errors in a sentence that was less than two lines long. To make it even funnier, the sentence in question was pointing out someone else's perceived errors.
Congratulations Keano - yew trewly arr a dik.Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

Do you actually think you can play in the Prem with 2 up front? The generally accepted tactic for the struggling teams is to play 5 in the middle though it seems assumed that someone will partner Ings. Can't help feeling you're being a bit naive.

Do you actually think you can play in the Prem with 2 up front? The generally accepted tactic for the struggling teams is to play 5 in the middle though it seems assumed that someone will partner Ings. Can't help feeling you're being a bit naive.TurfMoorTom

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley wrote:
We have no option but to up the anti after the dross on display at Accy. If it were me I wouldn't make Jukes loan permanent, he's not good enough.

You talk some crap Barry, remind me again did you beat Accy, the answer you are looking for is NO. You couldn't even beat Bradford, so what does that say about your chances this season. Enough said you prat !!!!!!!!!

[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
We have no option but to up the anti after the dross on display at Accy. If it were me I wouldn't make Jukes loan permanent, he's not good enough.[/p][/quote]You talk some crap Barry, remind me again did you beat Accy, the answer you are looking for is NO. You couldn't even beat Bradford, so what does that say about your chances this season. Enough said you prat !!!!!!!!!mjp 53

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Do you actually think you can play in the Prem with 2 up front? The generally accepted tactic for the struggling teams is to play 5 in the middle though it seems assumed that someone will partner Ings. Can't help feeling you're being a bit naive.

Sorry Barry it is you that is naïve in more ways than one, naïve enough to think anyone gives a s**t what you say.

[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
Do you actually think you can play in the Prem with 2 up front? The generally accepted tactic for the struggling teams is to play 5 in the middle though it seems assumed that someone will partner Ings. Can't help feeling you're being a bit naive.[/p][/quote]Sorry Barry it is you that is naïve in more ways than one, naïve enough to think anyone gives a s**t what you say.mjp 53

McClaret wrote:
Will we loan a few players to Blackpool so we can actually have a game?

Should be a good chance for some trialists to get a deal? If not they could round up some dads off the beach!

[quote][p][bold]McClaret[/bold] wrote:
Will we loan a few players to Blackpool so we can actually have a game?[/p][/quote]Should be a good chance for some trialists to get a deal? If not they could round up some dads off the beach!Claretcert

RobH2O . wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable

yawn

[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O .[/bold] wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary![/p][/quote]regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable[/p][/quote]yawnKeen O to Get Kean Out

RobH2O . wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable

yawn

You not answering my comment above?

Thought not you dunce.

[quote][p][bold]Keen O to Get Kean Out[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O .[/bold] wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary![/p][/quote]regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable[/p][/quote]yawn[/p][/quote]You not answering my comment above?
Thought not you dunce.Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

RobH2O . wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable

yawn

You not answering my comment above?

Thought not you dunce.

You are not answering what ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' means, you dunce.
What does it mean ? i asked first , read what i put dunce.
what does ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' mean ?
''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' ?????????

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Keen O to Get Kean Out[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O .[/bold] wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary![/p][/quote]regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable[/p][/quote]yawn[/p][/quote]You not answering my comment above?
Thought not you dunce.[/p][/quote]You are not answering what ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' means, you dunce.
What does it mean ? i asked first , read what i put dunce.
what does ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' mean ?
''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' ?????????Keen O to Get Kean Out

RobH2O . wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable

yawn

You not answering my comment above?

Thought not you dunce.

You are not answering what ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' means, you dunce.
What does it mean ? i asked first , read what i put dunce.
what does ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' mean ?
''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' ?????????

Ok, I am guessing you were like way behind at the bottom of the class at Shadsworth School for the Mentally retarded?

Firstly - I didn't quote that, so no idea why you are asking ME what it means!

But seeing as you asked, I would imagine it means, we did a load of fitness work in Austria, so playing competitive games like friendlies adds to this work, you know 'tops it up'??

If you don't understand I guess there really is no hope for you and you should restrict yourself to posting on the Spongebob messageboard.

[quote][p][bold]Keen O to Get Kean Out[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Keen O to Get Kean Out[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O .[/bold] wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary![/p][/quote]regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable[/p][/quote]yawn[/p][/quote]You not answering my comment above?
Thought not you dunce.[/p][/quote]You are not answering what ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' means, you dunce.
What does it mean ? i asked first , read what i put dunce.
what does ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' mean ?
''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' ?????????[/p][/quote]Ok, I am guessing you were like way behind at the bottom of the class at Shadsworth School for the Mentally retarded?
Firstly - I didn't quote that, so no idea why you are asking ME what it means!
But seeing as you asked, I would imagine it means, we did a load of fitness work in Austria, so playing competitive games like friendlies adds to this work, you know 'tops it up'??
If you don't understand I guess there really is no hope for you and you should restrict yourself to posting on the Spongebob messageboard.Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Do you actually think you can play in the Prem with 2 up front? The generally accepted tactic for the struggling teams is to play 5 in the middle though it seems assumed that someone will partner Ings. Can't help feeling you're being a bit naive.

Sorry Barry it is you that is naïve in more ways than one, naïve enough to think anyone gives a s**t what you say.

Barry? I thought this cretins name was Bishop Basher being one of the biggest W@nker on these pages.

[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
Do you actually think you can play in the Prem with 2 up front? The generally accepted tactic for the struggling teams is to play 5 in the middle though it seems assumed that someone will partner Ings. Can't help feeling you're being a bit naive.[/p][/quote]Sorry Barry it is you that is naïve in more ways than one, naïve enough to think anyone gives a s**t what you say.[/p][/quote]Barry? I thought this cretins name was Bishop Basher being one of the biggest W@nker on these pages.andy1

As usual I put up a legitimate footballing issue out there with weight and substance, and it decends into bishop bashing and Barry bullying. Are there any football fans out there who talk sense? There's only Turf Moor Tom and I who seem to know what football is.
Burnley no1 fan.

As usual I put up a legitimate footballing issue out there with weight and substance, and it decends into bishop bashing and Barry bullying. Are there any football fans out there who talk sense? There's only Turf Moor Tom and I who seem to know what football is.
Burnley no1 fan.AnotherPounding4Burnley

RobH2O . wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' what language is that. schools = education = good english

Oh dear, how to make yourself look a complete bellend in one ill judged rant.

Practice what you preach you educationally challenged no dad.

[quote][p][bold]Keen O to Get Kean Out[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O .[/bold] wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary![/p][/quote]''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' what language is that. schools = education = good english[/p][/quote]Oh dear, how to make yourself look a complete bellend in one ill judged rant.
Practice what you preach you educationally challenged no dad.The Seagull has landed

RobH2O . wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable

yawn

You not answering my comment above?

Thought not you dunce.

You are not answering what ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' means, you dunce.
What does it mean ? i asked first , read what i put dunce.
what does ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' mean ?
''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' ?????????

I'd just leave it at that if I were you.

Just go sit in the corner with your "I'm a retard" hat on and come back and have another go tomorrow.

[quote][p][bold]Keen O to Get Kean Out[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Keen O to Get Kean Out[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O .[/bold] wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary![/p][/quote]regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable[/p][/quote]yawn[/p][/quote]You not answering my comment above?
Thought not you dunce.[/p][/quote]You are not answering what ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' means, you dunce.
What does it mean ? i asked first , read what i put dunce.
what does ''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' mean ?
''It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly'' ?????????[/p][/quote]I'd just leave it at that if I were you.
Just go sit in the corner with your "I'm a retard" hat on and come back and have another go tomorrow.The Seagull has landed

RobH2O . wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable

It doesn't matter anyway you moron ;the filth will start by closing 3 main roads in Burnley for every game just like they did last year and stopped buses running along their routes forcing some people to be marooned in their houses etc.now maybe more now that they the are in the sky league.Pubs and restaurants will be forced to close some will get told not to use glasses etc .;you wont be able to get a meal in some because they wont allow knives to be used at the tables .When sky tell then and anyone else when they can play peoples lives will be turned upside down just trying to get to work Roll on the sky league zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz the most corrupt boring .cheating football ive ever seen.

[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O .[/bold] wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary![/p][/quote]regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable[/p][/quote]It doesn't matter anyway you moron ;the filth will start by closing 3 main roads in Burnley for every game just like they did last year and stopped buses running along their routes forcing some people to be marooned in their houses etc.now maybe more now that they the are in the sky league.Pubs and restaurants will be forced to close some will get told not to use glasses etc .;you wont be able to get a meal in some because they wont allow knives to be used at the tables .When sky tell then and anyone else when they can play peoples lives will be turned upside down just trying to get to work Roll on the sky league zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz the most corrupt boring .cheating football ive ever seen.slants

ley wrote:
We have no option but to up the anti after the dross on display at Accy. If it were me I wouldn't make Jukes loan permanent, he's not good enough.

I think you maybe went to the toilet halfway the that and forgot to join the beginning to an ending. Tha display at acct was OK but now Burnley need to........ Please don't try again my brain is confused every time you post. But PNE is up a gear, no slip ups please and I also think a BRFC friendly would be impossible but both clubs are doing a lot for Lancashire football this season with their friendly programme.

Haha you got beat off PNE hahahaha

[quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
We have no option but to up the anti after the dross on display at Accy. If it were me I wouldn't make Jukes loan permanent, he's not good enough.[/p][/quote]I think you maybe went to the toilet halfway the that and forgot to join the beginning to an ending. Tha display at acct was OK but now Burnley need to........ Please don't try again my brain is confused every time you post. But PNE is up a gear, no slip ups please and I also think a BRFC friendly would be impossible but both clubs are doing a lot for Lancashire football this season with their friendly programme.[/p][/quote]Haha you got beat off PNE hahahahaBlackburnRoversFC f*****g hate burnley

Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created
5 days ago

PNE 2 Burnley 1 PNE 2 Burnley 1
25 mins ago

A piece of brilliance from Josh Brownhill gave North End a deserved 2-1 win against local rivals Burnley at Deepdale

5 days ago
Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created
5 days ago
PNE 2 Burnley 1 PNE 2 Burnley 1
25 mins ago
A piece of brilliance from Josh Brownhill gave North End a deserved 2-1 win against local rivals Burnley at Deepdaleewood-blue

RobH2O . wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary!

regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable

It doesn't matter anyway you moron ;the filth will start by closing 3 main roads in Burnley for every game just like they did last year and stopped buses running along their routes forcing some people to be marooned in their houses etc.now maybe more now that they the are in the sky league.Pubs and restaurants will be forced to close some will get told not to use glasses etc .;you wont be able to get a meal in some because they wont allow knives to be used at the tables .When sky tell then and anyone else when they can play peoples lives will be turned upside down just trying to get to work Roll on the sky league zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz the most corrupt boring .cheating football ive ever seen.

Its not started yet. You can't have seen it.

[quote][p][bold]slants[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O .[/bold] wrote:
Playing local sides gives games some spice. Its ups the competitive element of the pre-season games. It should allow the Austria work to be topped up accordingly. Pity it a Rovers game couldn't have been included in the itinerary![/p][/quote]regrettably there is too much baggage between the two clubs for there to be a pre-season....all sorts of nonsense about stewarding and police costs, helicopters much of it probably not required - but we all know there are idiots on both sides (including on these pages) - so probably best if it doesnt happen as the police costs alone would make it non-viable[/p][/quote]It doesn't matter anyway you moron ;the filth will start by closing 3 main roads in Burnley for every game just like they did last year and stopped buses running along their routes forcing some people to be marooned in their houses etc.now maybe more now that they the are in the sky league.Pubs and restaurants will be forced to close some will get told not to use glasses etc .;you wont be able to get a meal in some because they wont allow knives to be used at the tables .When sky tell then and anyone else when they can play peoples lives will be turned upside down just trying to get to work Roll on the sky league zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz the most corrupt boring .cheating football ive ever seen.[/p][/quote]Its not started yet. You can't have seen it.RobH2O .

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley wrote:
As usual I put up a legitimate footballing issue out there with weight and substance, and it decends into bishop bashing and Barry bullying. Are there any football fans out there who talk sense? There's only Turf Moor Tom and I who seem to know what football is.
Burnley no1 fan.

The depth of your love for yourself knows no bounds. "As usual, I put up a legitimate footballing issue..." Oh, you're so special, a deep thinker, a man of substance. And I truly admire your immenseness - right from the heart of my bottom.

[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
As usual I put up a legitimate footballing issue out there with weight and substance, and it decends into bishop bashing and Barry bullying. Are there any football fans out there who talk sense? There's only Turf Moor Tom and I who seem to know what football is.
Burnley no1 fan.[/p][/quote]The depth of your love for yourself knows no bounds. "As usual, I put up a legitimate footballing issue..." Oh, you're so special, a deep thinker, a man of substance. And I truly admire your immenseness - right from the heart of my bottom.RobH2O .

Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created
5 days ago

PNE 2 Burnley 1 PNE 2 Burnley 1
25 mins ago

A piece of brilliance from Josh Brownhill gave North End a deserved 2-1 win against local rivals Burnley at Deepdale

Blackburn 1 Burnley 2 March 9th

[quote][p][bold]ewood-blue[/bold] wrote:
5 days ago
Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created
5 days ago
PNE 2 Burnley 1 PNE 2 Burnley 1
25 mins ago
A piece of brilliance from Josh Brownhill gave North End a deserved 2-1 win against local rivals Burnley at Deepdale[/p][/quote]Blackburn 1 Burnley 2 March 9thtall in the saddle

Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created
5 days ago

PNE 2 Burnley 1 PNE 2 Burnley 1
25 mins ago

A piece of brilliance from Josh Brownhill gave North End a deserved 2-1 win against local rivals Burnley at Deepdale

Blackburn 1 Burnley 2 March 9th

[quote][p][bold]ewood-blue[/bold] wrote:
5 days ago
Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created
5 days ago
PNE 2 Burnley 1 PNE 2 Burnley 1
25 mins ago
A piece of brilliance from Josh Brownhill gave North End a deserved 2-1 win against local rivals Burnley at Deepdale[/p][/quote]Blackburn 1 Burnley 2 March 9thtall in the saddle

Preston 2- Burnley 1, sack the board.
The model we were all pointing to at Hull city have spent 14.5 million this close season, and 27 million last season, the board have not backed dyche, we have signed a bunch of nomarks and we have been beaten by Preston. Relegation looks a stark reality. Been telling you all for weeks. Poor showing. but we did it to ourselves

Preston 2- Burnley 1, sack the board.
The model we were all pointing to at Hull city have spent 14.5 million this close season, and 27 million last season, the board have not backed dyche, we have signed a bunch of nomarks and we have been beaten by Preston. Relegation looks a stark reality. Been telling you all for weeks. Poor showing. but we did it to ourselvesAnotherPounding4Burnley

Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created
5 days ago

PNE 2 Burnley 1 PNE 2 Burnley 1
25 mins ago

A piece of brilliance from Josh Brownhill gave North End a deserved 2-1 win against local rivals Burnley at Deepdale

Blackburn 1 Burnley 2 March 9th

Past history Mr Wayne.

Done and dusted, can't turn back the clock and all that jazz.

As for tonight, well, it was only a friendly after all.

Tick....tock...

[quote][p][bold]tall in the saddle[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]ewood-blue[/bold] wrote:
5 days ago
Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created Gaffer Pleased With Chances Created
5 days ago
PNE 2 Burnley 1 PNE 2 Burnley 1
25 mins ago
A piece of brilliance from Josh Brownhill gave North End a deserved 2-1 win against local rivals Burnley at Deepdale[/p][/quote]Blackburn 1 Burnley 2 March 9th[/p][/quote]Past history Mr Wayne.
Done and dusted, can't turn back the clock and all that jazz.
As for tonight, well, it was only a friendly after all.
Tick....tock...owd nick

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley wrote:
Preston 2- Burnley 1, sack the board.
The model we were all pointing to at Hull city have spent 14.5 million this close season, and 27 million last season, the board have not backed dyche, we have signed a bunch of nomarks and we have been beaten by Preston. Relegation looks a stark reality. Been telling you all for weeks. Poor showing. but we did it to ourselves

And Hull drew 1-1 with North Ferriby and 1-1 with Barnsley, your point is what Staric.

[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
Preston 2- Burnley 1, sack the board.
The model we were all pointing to at Hull city have spent 14.5 million this close season, and 27 million last season, the board have not backed dyche, we have signed a bunch of nomarks and we have been beaten by Preston. Relegation looks a stark reality. Been telling you all for weeks. Poor showing. but we did it to ourselves[/p][/quote]And Hull drew 1-1 with North Ferriby and 1-1 with Barnsley, your point is what Staric.McClaret