Perkins v. Rock

United States District Court, Second Circuit

September 5, 2013

MICHAEL PERKINS, Plaintiff,v.DAVID A. ROCK, et al., Defendants.

DECISION & ORDER

THOMAS J. McAVOY, District Judge.

This action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, was referred by this Court to the Honorable Therèse W. Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c).

In the Report-Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Dancks recommends that Defendants' motion to dismiss be granted without prejudice and Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint and two motions for injunctive relief be denied as moot. No objections to the Report-Recommendation dated June 28, 2013 have been filed. After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein.

For the foregoing reasons, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and allows Plaintiff thirty days to file and serve an Amended Complaint as against the individual defendants only (i.e., not against Upstate Correctional Facility.). If Plaintiff does not file and serve an Amended Complaint within thirty days of the date of this decision, the ...

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.