The Left's Coming Counter-Attack!

I wanted to share the following recent article that revealed the Left’s coming counter attack after the majority of American voters rejected and/or dismissed the circus-mirror image of America being peddled by the left and their fawning, complicit media because they were tired of being beaten about the head and shoulders while those they elected to defend them stood by holding the coats of their abusers and elected a brawler of their own-You Decide:

The Left's Coming Counter-Attack!-Posted on American Thinker-By Joe Herring-On December 5, 2016:

When the Soviet Union fell, all the little commies didn't wake up the next morning and say, "You know, those wacky Americans were right all along! Let's go do some freedom and liberty stuff!"

No, they woke up bitter and furious...spreading out among the intelligentsia of western Europe; Great Britain; and, to a lesser extent, the United States. They were welcomed by their fellow travelers: first and foremost, the misfit toys inhabiting the islands of academia – who were already busily nurturing bitterness and envy among their charges with the care of a master gardener.

They threw themselves into plotting and agitating, insinuating themselves into every possible position of influence they could manage – all to keep the flame of statist oppression lit, though necessarily hidden.

They found suitable vehicles in the international environmentalist movement and newly created issues that could be weaponized for use against that evil hegemon of economic and individual liberty, the dreaded victor of the Cold War, the United States.

The "crisis creation" machine went into high gear, fueled by alarmist junk science and billions of federal research dollars.

Eisenhower's famous warning about the military-industrial complex was soon greatly overshadowed by his lesser known warning from the same speech about the potential of a "scientific-technological elite" dominating policy, creating a "rule of experts" who derive both their funding and their marching orders from government.

Case in point: "climate change," née "global warming," née "global cooling," etc. When a nation's institutions of higher learning derive upwards of 75% of their total research budgets from government, it is an impossible task to prevent the creation of a vast echo chamber, crafted to suit the whims of the funders.

This is precisely the danger of which Eisenhower spoke.

After years of pruning, fertilizing, and watering their post-secondary gardens, the left has reaped a bountiful harvest of indoctrinated political automatons, gleefully tightening its hold on the generations destined to govern our future with each passing graduation ceremony.

These first fruits of statist insinuation naturally gravitated toward public employment, in agencies where their misbegotten fantasies of a static climate and unspoilt wilderness could be realized. They have risen through the ranks, hiring like-minded graduates in their wake – until today, the left lies resplendent in the glory of dominance in both the social and natural sciences, waving wands made of tax dollars in furtherance of their transformative ideas of how we all ought to live.

They felt their oats fully with the election of one of their own in 2008. They abandoned all pretense and threw open the doors to their diseased inner sanctum...baring their storehouse of wilted values and stunted virtues.

The insults came more rapidly then. Men became women, or even little girls, merely by saying so, and those of us who dared to reproach the deviant for wishing to toilet with our children were derided as bigots and threatened with the full force of government if we didn't acquiesce.

Foreign enemies of all we believe were imported to our cities under the flag of tolerance and rescue, and those who stood against this suicidal tide were soon awash in recriminations from our well-meaning but ill-informed neighbors, who hammered their narrative in our churches and our schools.

When we finally turned away in disgust, they unleashed their most potent weapon – our own children – whom they had taught to worship at the altar of a gray, formless morality, where rights are derived from acceptance into the collective, and justice is a relative concept subject to the whim of government.

We sent our offspring to them for an education, and they sent them back to us, spitting with hatred for the way of life that enabled their ease. "You dare defy us? Our soldiers are your own flesh and blood!"

They threw them at us like grenades – warped, misguided and misinformed, filled with explosive fury and lit by an impossibly short fuse. Wave after wave, they sent them into the streets to burn, to riot, and to cloak their debauchery of liberty with the fresh face of a new generation.

And we backed down, knowing we had been gravely molested but unwilling to challenge the perpetrators for fear of ensnaring our own children in the fray.

We held elections. We elected majorities who then refused to fight. We listened to our "leaders," who told us to appease the gnashing beast because the world was changing and we had to remain "relevant."

Now, after a great while and innumerable offenses, we have elected someone who sees no value in the bureaucrat's mantra of "that's the way we've always done it." We explored unfamiliar electoral terrain and found someone who respects the origin of our ideals as embodied in our founding documents. A man who brusquely (and entertainingly!) dismissed the circus-mirror image of America peddled by the left and their fawning, complicit media. Tired of being beaten about the head and shoulders while those we elected to defend us stood by holding the coats of our abusers, we elected a brawler of our own.

Those repudiated on November 8, 2016 have not yet fully realized that voters hadn't failed to understand what we saw when they revealed their inmost desires to us. Rather, we understood all too well, and we turned away, revolted by the sight.

When they fully comprehend the enormousness of their rejection, we had better be prepared, because these are people who would see the whole nation brought to ruin before permitting it to succeed despite them.

This election was a modern-day Fort Sumter – the first shots of a long and brutal struggle to come.

The left will stop at nothing. They will riot at the slightest provocation. They will use our children as suicide bombers, blowing families apart over made up differences. They will abuse the court system, the regulatory agencies, and every damn little ordinance in the tiniest of backwater towns to harass and beleaguer our efforts.

We must fight for our children as we fight for our future.

There are those who will counsel appeasement, as they always have. Reject their advice without hesitation. Compromise is possible only when both parties agree on an outcome, merely debating the best method to achieve it. Despite what the quisling class tells you, traveling together is an impossibility when you are going in opposite directions.

The last eight years have been a dumpster fire, with the foundational timbers of our republic as fuel. You can't leave glowing embers behind. By debating the demonstrable fantasies of the left, we grant them legitimacy, leaving them as glowing embers in the minds of successive generations.

It won't be easy, and the left will ensure that it won't be bloodless, but it's as necessary as food and water to the health of the body. Prime the fire hoses and disperse the rioters. There can never be such a thing as "space to destroy."

I tell you this not to depress you, but to alert you, so you aren't caught off guard by the ferocity of the coming counter-attack. History teaches that the leftist leviathan of November 9 is the same leftist leviathan of November 7.

The following recent articles revealed: 1) that Congressional Democrats were attempting to ‘challenge Trump’s Electoral College win’; 2) that Trump's Electoral College 'win was certified', when Biden shut down Democratic challenges; and 3) that the N.Y. Times is aiding Communist-socialist-feminist-LGBT-anarchist’s plans for ‘Inauguration Day mayhem.’ If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

Congressional Democrats Attempt Challenge to Trump’s Electoral College Win!-Posted on The Political Insider-By Kosar, Breaking News Editor-On January 5, 2017:

The following recent article and video revealed; 1) that Obama recently made a major move to ‘keep power’ once Trump is sworn in; 2) that the Democrats recently called for Senate to ‘delay hearings on Trump’s Cabinet picks’; and 3) that Obama and his DHS Chief have federalized the election system as a means of ‘overturning Trump’s Election.’ If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

TYRANT – Obama Makes Major Move to Keep Power Once Trump is Sworn In!-Posed on Angry Patriot-On January 7, 2017:

The following recent articles revealed: 1) that a ‘major threat’ has recently been made against President-elect Trump; and 2) that approximately 5,000 National Guard Troops will be attending Trump’s Inauguration because of an alleged ‘murder plot.’ If true-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

The following recent video revealed that ‘George Soros’ and ‘Bill Ayers’, along with numerous other ‘Russian/Communist collaborators’, to include ‘U.S. Representatives’ have teamed up to coordinate ‘violent riots that will allegedly include bombings and killing of Trump supporters.’ These riots are scheduled to take place during ‘Trumps Inauguration.’ Also included are the steps that are being taken by the military and numerous other civilian law enforcement agencies to protect the Inauguration. If True-What ‘s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

Video: The Steps Being Taken to Protect the Inauguration -Mike Adams and Dave Hodges!-Posted on YouTube.com-By The Common Sense Show-On January 9, 2017:

The following recent article reveled a shootout at U.S. Consulate in Nuevo Laredo as part of a ‘Cartel-Terrorist’ attack planned for Trump’s Inauguration. If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

The following recent article revealed that ‘Bikers for Trump’ and other biker groups, along with other pro-Trump groups plan to show show up at Inauguration to help stop the thousands of crybaby liberals from getting out of hand, as they did throughout the general election campaign-You Decide:

The following recent article revealed that Obama is supposedly ‘firing the National Guard Chief’, a key figure overseeing riot control at the inauguration, during Trump’s Inauguration which could trigger mass riots and ‘threatens Trump’s life.’ If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

The following recent thought-provoking article revealed that at least ‘36 protests’ are scheduled across America for Trump’s Inauguration, along with the main (lame) stream media’s ongoing ‘Anti-Inauguration.” hype. If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

The following recent article revealed that the various Federal agencies involved to provide security for Trumps Inauguration (e.g., DHS, FBI Secret Service, etc.) are operating as if this inauguration will be no different than previous inaugurations and are allegedly ‘understaffed’, which means that should the protests spin out of control, they will be ‘displaced and overrun’ creating significant risk for all those participating in the various inauguration events. It also reveals the most likely scenario of events, to include the groups that are allegedly protesting (rioting). If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

The following recent video reveals the most stunning interview in the history of The Common Sense Show that recently interviewed Paul Preston regarding a ‘Red Dawn’ scenario that is currently developing across the southern boarder that involves ‘Mexican drug cartels, MS13 Gang members and Islamist radicals.’ This Red Dawn scenario includes ‘violent riots that will start in Mexico and will spread into the U.S.’ and are scheduled to take place on Inauguration Day. If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

The following recent article revealed a report that revealed that ‘Jeb Bush’ was recently implicated in the Russian ‘dirty dossier’ that was allegedly compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele and that Trump is reportedly furious. If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

The following article revealed that Trump fired right back at ‘U.S. Senator John Lewis’ after he recently stated that he did not see Donald Trump as being a ‘legitimate president.’ If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

The following recent article revealed that WikiLeaks recently sent out a mysterious tweet that hinted of a ‘assassination attempt’ against WikiLeaks staff, to include the editor. It also revealed that Hillary Clinton once ‘joked’ about ordering a drone strike on the Ecuadorian embassy in London where the WikiLeaks founder sought asylum. If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

The following recent articles, reports and videos revealed: 1) that Hillary Clinton’s operatives are stoking doubts of Trump’s presidency by ‘spreading rumors’ about ‘Russian vote rigging and pushing protests’; 2) that the Obama White House refuses call Trump a ‘Legitimate President'; 3) that supposed ‘Grassroots’ organization is offering '$2.5k' to protest Trump Inauguration, to include providing travel expenses, and insurance benefits to 'operatives'; 4) that anarchists plan to target ‘balls, events and Trump supporters all over D.C.’ during Inauguration week; 5) that anti-Trump activists plan to have an ‘acid attack’ during Inauguration; 6) that anti-Trump activists plotting to set off ‘stink bombs, sprinklers at inaugural fetes’ during Inauguration; and 7) that CNN/Buzzfeed (fake news outlets) will allegedly be releasing damaging new Trump tape ‘48 hours before Inauguration.’ If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

The following recent article revealed that the DC Police will not be allowed to have their body cameras on as it’s ‘against the law’ for them to film and monitor the protesters present at the inauguration. If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

DC Cops Given Disgusting Order For Trump’s Inauguration Day!-Posted on Tea Party News-On January 19, 2017:

Note:If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog and/or videos, please copy website link and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide:

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must be taking night classes at the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez School of Government.

Pelosi, the 79-year-old third-highest ranking official in the U.S. government, was speaking to the Center for American Progress today when she mistakenly said there are “two co-equal branches” of government, before correcting herself to say there are three.

Watch:

“First of all, let me just say, we take an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Pelosi said.

“Democrats take that oath seriously, and we are committed to honoring our oath of office. I’m not sure that our Republican colleagues share that commitment, and I’m not sure that the president of the United States does, too,” she claimed.

“So, in light of the fact that the beauty of the Constitution is a system of checks and balances— two co-equal branches— three co-equal branches of government,” she corrected with a laugh.

“A check and balance on each other,” she continued. “Con— Constitution spells out the pri— pa, uh, the duties of Congress and one of them is oversight of the president of the United States, another one of them is to impeach the president of the United States,” Pelosi said.

In November, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied supporters on Facebook to pitch in and help Democrats take back “all three chambers of Congress.”

“…the Progressive movement works and it wins in all districts…If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress– three chambers of government…,” she said during the virtual appearance.

She clarified that she meant the “presidency, the Senate and the House.”

According to the Constitution, the three branches of government are the legislative, executive and judicial.

Below: Nancy Pelosi is continuing to promote the false narrative that President Trump is involved in a cover-up and therefore may be guilty of an impeachable offense. Millie Weaver joins Alex to break down the propaganda being used to overturn the democratic election of 2016