A Blog for All and None

Menu

Month: April 2014

This article is in response to a specific request, made by the sponsor of the previous article. You too can sponsor articles on this blog! Just name an amount and a topic! Everybody wins!

One of the old interpretations of the story of Adam and Eve was that Adam was hermaphroditic before his ribbed got pulled out to make Eve. The Original Man was either genderless, or was both genders at once.

In many creation stories, one can easily see a parallel to the development of human consciousness. In the womb and with newborn infants, the sex differences are barely present in the personality.

Gender is one of nature’s most important distinctions. Most species reproduce sexually, and therefore require division of the species into males and females. Carl Jung’s psychology is very focused on what might be called the “Archetype of Wholeness”. This archetype does not distinguish between Male and Female, but like the Original Man contains both. By declaring that individuals have access to the Archetype of Wholeness, it is implicit that this archetype supersedes Masculinity and Femininity both.

I heard a joke which ran: A man finds a bottle on the beach and rubs it and a Genie pops out. The Genie says he can grant the man one wish in return for setting him free. The man says he has always wanted to be able to drive to Hawaii from California and asks for a road between the two to be built. The Genie complains about the technical difficulties of such a project, and asks the man if he could wish for something else. The man says okay, that he has never really understood women, and that if he could just understand women his wish would be satisfied. The Genie says, “Do you want that highway with two lanes, or four?”

The implication of this joke is that the nature of femininity is utterly inaccessible to a man. This works pretty well so long as the gender roles in a society are rather clearly defined. But in the modern world that couldn’t be further from the case. Our society is running along the motto started by Thomas Jefferson, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all [people] are created equal.”

If our society is moving towards the equality of all people, men and women alike, the joke above about the Genie will start to seem out of place.

In trying to understand gender roles, there are two sources of information, Nature and Society. Both Nature and Society play critical roles in creating what we think of as a “Man” or “Woman”. The modern world has discovered a distaste for any sort of legal separation between what men and women are allowed to do. Thus, our Society is rebelling against its own traditional ideas of men and women. Nature does not give in to fads so easily, and the chemical hormones which nature pours into the genders continue to affect their behavior in well-known ways. However, modern science’s newfound mastery of those chemicals allows people who don’t identify with the genders nature gave them to switch according to their individual feelings of what gender they “really” are. The process isn’t perfect, though, especially when it comes to anatomical changes. But the psychological results of hormone treatments are pretty effective.

Still, it is very common for someone invest a huge part of their identity into their gender. They do this both at the bidding of Nature – by means of her powerful hormones and the way she constructs the physical body – and of Society, which despite the modern tendency to neutralize the sex differences, still has many ideas about what is right and wrong for Men and Women.

Since the pull of gender identity is so strong, a conflict arises when the Archetype of Wholeness comes into play. For some people, the development of only a few parts of their personality becomes a source of great depression. Society tends to encourage a person to develop his areas of strength but to ignore his areas of weakness. One’s areas of strength are more quickly noticed and more quickly rewarded. In order to survive, a person will normally abandon the development of her areas of weakness. These take longer to develop and tend to go unnoticed or, being noticed, are bullied into submission by people who are jealous of competition in their areas of strength.

The more parts of a person which are bullied into submission, the more work it will take later on when the person’s attention turns toward the Archetype of Wholeness instead of toward the specific field(s) they have mastered in their early years.

The Jungian concepts of the Anima and the Animus – in Latin, the “Soul” and the “Spirit” respectively – are descriptions of natural tendencies Carl Jung noticed in people’s dreams, fantasies, and visions. For men, he noticed that the Archetype of Wholeness was often associated with the figure of a woman or women – which he called the Anima, and vice versa in the case of the Animus. In a man’s dream, a woman may show the way to a new destination, or represent a missing piece of a larger puzzle. This indicates that the man’s ego is very attached to his idea of “Manhood”, and that the Archetype of Wholeness has run into a conflict with that idea.

It’s important to remember that gender roles are reinforced not just by an individual’s idea of himself, but by those around him as well. Thus, the role of “Man” may be thrust upon someone by his wife, his children, his work partners, etc. Thus, it’s not easy to instantly divest oneself of one’s gender identity even if one has some understanding of the phenomenon.

In order to access the less developed parts of the man or woman in question, the Archetype of Wholeness will assume the form of the opposite gender, in his or her dreams, for example. When it does, Jung called it the Anima or Animus. In order to grow and adapt, the person must increase his or her conscious awareness of the nature of the identities he or she has unconsciously assumed. The relationship he or she has to both sexes is usually a very powerful influence on his or her expectations, but in order to grow, those expectations need to change.

The power of the Anima and Animus speaks to the power of the gender identities given to us by Nature and Society both. Sometimes gender becomes the primary point of difficulty, at which point the figures in one’s dreams will have pronounced gender roles. In the end, the Archetype of Wholeness is really more powerful than the “Archetype of the Genders”, and the symbol of Wholeness can appear in many more forms besides simply Men and Women – Crystals, Snakes, Rocks, Cities, Circles, Rainbows, Butterflies. But when the Archetypes of Gender appear, they must be encountered with full seriousness. All the archetypes are like Gods and one must treat them as such, or face the consequences.

If somebody offered you ten dollars to write a blog entry on a topic of your choice, would you do it?

The short answer in my case is yes. I have not been a writer for all that long, but I understand that the internet age has come as a hit to professional writers. A professional writer of 30 years ago may have balked at the paltry fee of ten dollars for a piece of his work, but I am neither a professional writer, nor is it 30 years ago. At this point it would be a boost to my ego to make any money from writing. Indeed, it would be such a boost to my ego that I would undergo much self-scrutiny. Will I disappoint the client? Am I worth it?

When I consider the fact that I receive Social Security Disability, Food Stamps, and Medicare, that if it weren’t for these programs I would not have my own place to live and would be begging for food, it pleases me to consider that the government is not giving me handouts. Rather, it’s actually my employer. I can buy into this notion. When I write a blog entry, make a video, or write my book, I’m actually working for the government.

In the so-called developed world, most countries will have some means of keeping people such as me off of the streets. In the so-called developing countries, the old rules of anything-goes, survival-of-the-fittest reign. The wealthy nations feel the need to flaunt their wealth through programs designed to keep their citizens from starving and having no healthcare, and the like. Before one decides too quickly in favor of the developed world, one must bear in mind the evidence that wealthy countries are able to acquire and sustain their wealth only by restricting the development of the poor countries, that they might keep the cost of raw materials low, for example.

Nonetheless, the competition for moral character among the developed nations leads them to create programs which, as I said, keep people like me from having to beg for food, shelter, etc. I think that’s the best way to understand why the nations behave like they do. A given country doesn’t want to be the only one amongst its peers letting its people starve. Therefore, it uses its treasury to pay for programs preventing this. Or, to prove its greater wealth, gives them even more benefits.

I don’t mean to imply that desire to look good in comparison to neighboring countries (or states) is the only motivation for setting up social welfare programs – but considering that the program is not designed to benefit anyone outside the country, that as far as any given national or state welfare program is concerned, the people just outside the border can go rot in hell, it does seem clear that the benefits are designed to make the country look good rather than to help humanity in the general sense.

That, however, is only the beginning of a discussion which I will revisit eventually. I need to work my way back to the ten dollars which I received in advance for this blog post.

The way I can justify receiving food stamps, disability money, etc. is by thinking that I indeed work for the government. The events leading to their “hiring” me are another story to which I must return eventually. But my position satisfies me. I have found no individual who has both the means and the desire to employ me. Working for a large profit-making corporation is no better in my view than working for the government, unless I wish to make large amounts of money. Yet to make such money by working for a large corporation, I would need to be able to satisfy my moral conscience about who they were, whom they served, what part they played in the greater matrix of the world, and why. Needless to say, most companies are far too busy making money to retain a clear understanding of these questions, and as far as I understand it, they would expect me to do the same. So I’d rather working for the government at a mere survival wage, for now at least.

The particular position I have landed with the government allows me an enormous amount of freedom. I can act in whatever way I believe most benefits the government, and no one is standing over my shoulder. In many ways, as an independent philosopher, this is a perfect position to have obtained. Since the government is paid for by millions of taxpayers from every state, I do not need to make pointless enemies by acting in favor of any one group. Nor do I need to ally myself with the government’s positions either. The program under which I have been hired seems to allow even for total disagreement with government policy. Yet my morality and common sense prevent me from falling into complete ignorance of what is paying for my survival. If the government goes down, I go down with it. Not to mention simple gratitude that there is such a program which is helping me out.

But don’t let the above expressed gratitude make you think I will sacrifice my high philosophical standards simply to take sides with my government at the expense of those parties it chooses for its enemies. There is virtue in hiring someone for their independence of mind in contrast to their loyalty. Well-run institutions need more than just a bunch of “Yes men”. Still, such independent minds must remain very discreet, and never forget that their independence can pose just as much of a threat to their employers as a help. No bureaucracy is morally pure, and the independent mind who finds himself employed by a bureaucracy must take pains to preserve a means of escape should the prevailing winds turn against him.

Anyway, just because I work for the government doesn’t mean I make a whole lot of money. A friend drove to pick me up in my new neighborhood and was locking up the car when I saw ten dollars peeking out from under the seat. I pointed it out and he handed it to me, saying I could hold onto it. I told him that I’d hide it for him. I forget what happened next, but he suggested that I write a blog post, and at my current government salary, it was the kind of offer I couldn’t refuse.

So I’ve been living at my new place for one week. It’s an acceptable situation. I’m not sure I can afford to pay for an internet connection at home, so I’m saving this blog post to a flash drive and bringing it to the public library, which is only two blocks away from my house. I will sign in and post it there.

I was thinking about my situation. Do I think it’s good or bad? Am I happy with it? The thing which makes me feel okay is that I can’t see what job exists in the world which I would rather have than my current situation. Of course I can’t know whether I’d really like a job until I’ve worked it for a while, so I’m not saying that if I magically had Job X that I wouldn’t like it. What I am saying is that I don’t have the impulse to seek Job X from where I am now. The only thing I have real motivation for, to which I am able to devote sustained effort, is the book I decided to write about 5 months ago. And it’s not like I’m terribly excited about the book either, but the difference is that whereas I may put in a day or two looking for possible employment before becoming once again uninterested, I tend to put work into the book every day.

So the book is the current justification for my existence. As to how good it is, my opinion tends to vary. I have several motivations for writing it, which I am trying to balance out. I want it to be a good read, for example, in contrast to, say, an academic tome which merely contains useful information. Most importantly is that it represents an expression of my current self, just as any given painting represents the current expression of its artist. I’m learning to paint words.

I mean for the book to be read by people of different times and places. This is because I don’t think of myself as quick enough with current events to be able to ride their wave and get rewarded for it. I want to speak to humanity, rather than some subculture or section of it. This aspiration is not necessarily a formula for financial success, because most financially successful books have target audiences. If it turns out that without knowing it, I do have a type of audience which appreciates the book I will be glad for that. All I’m saying is that I have not consciously chosen to direct the book at one specific demographic.

Another peculiarity of the book that I can’t escape is that it’s my first one. On the plus side, it will therefore be more raw and possibly more compelling in terms of sheer energy. But it will be deficient in terms of the craft of book-writing. I think this is true of all first books, though, but I thought I should mention it anyway.

I also want to say if I haven’t said it before that the original goal of making my video game proved too lofty to attack directly. My book is proving far more manageable. I have finished the first phase in which the task was to write, write, write. Now I am in a hybrid phase where I continue to write but I am reading what I have written, trying to find the “book in the book”, so to say. Editing is a necessary task which looms like a monster for me. I have deferred that task until I get a better sense of the whole purpose of the book.

The experience of writing my book is giving me a valuable understanding of how the way one perceives oneself abstractly meets up with concrete reality. My obligation to finish the book means I can no longer imagine myself to be something or other – I must find out what I really am. It will be present in the end product. If I cannot produce an end product, then that will be an indicator of the kind of person I am too.

So I need to put a certain amount of passion into each chapter in order to increase the quality of the end product, but not so much passion that I become frustrated with what I have written and never finish. That’s the experience writing this book is giving me.