The democrats are so good at manipulating all of our government security and investigative agencies that nobody can get prosecuted unless democrats OK it

It seems obvious from former FBI Director James Comey’s recent testimony that then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch tried to give political cover to Hillary Clinton by instructing him to call the criminal investigation into her email server a “matter” instead. I didn’t go to law school, but a careful look at Comey’s testimony shows me that he, in turn, has done what he could to give Lynch cover as well. Call it “pay it forward” inside the Justice Department.

“I don’t know if it was intentional or not,” says Comey of Lynch’s instruction, “but it gave the impression that the attorney was trying to align how we describe our work with the way it was being described in a political campaign.”

The key phrase: “I don’t know if it was intentional or not.”

Remember, Comey has said he gave Hillary a pass because he didn’t know if she intended to break the law, when, in fact, the presence of intent is irrelevant to the laws against mishandling material. Now, with Lynch, it’s even easier for him to use the issue of intent to provide a shield, because the charge of obstruction actually does involve intent. By casting doubt on her intent, he has protected her. It helps that Lynch never reveals the tiniest glimpse into the shrewd inner workings of her mind. She can stonewall better than anyone I’ve ever seen. Does anyone think this woman ever in her life does anything that’s not intentional?

Surely anyone not blinded by partisanship can see what’s going on with this investigation. Comey gets to appear forthright while helping both Hillary and Lynch avoid prosecution, leaks his own memo to achieve the appointment of a special counsel, and ends up as the main witness in a “trumped-up” investigation of the President led by his very close friend and mentor, Robert Mueller, who now has an obligation under the law to step away from that duty.

You need to be a member of REAL CONSERVATIVES to add comments!

All excellent points, Philip. If they take him out using the corrupt system against him to do so, then I think that will spark one helluva an upheavel which the country, as we know it, cannot survive. Assassination? The deep state will likely be successful getting away with it. It would be persuasively explained away as an violent act by a psychotic individual. Treacherous times, for sure.

With both parties united against everyone outside the beltway, I don't know there's a way back to what our founder's envisioned for this nation.

After having watched President Trump run into the Washington DC stonewall, and now being forced into a second investigation of his campaign and administration, I have doubts that any singular person can construct meaningful and positive changes for American citizens.

I've not yet given up hope that President Trump can force or negotiate his way forward.

The 4th branch of gov't, the vast unaccountable federal bureaucracy, which really runs this country and our lives, is the "enemy within". I fear this "deep state" more than I fear ISIS. The Right had best get off its collective pansy duff and begin to wage TOTAL POLITICAL WAR against these vermin, failing which there simply won't be a united States. Rule of Law appears to be a charade encouraged by wishful thinkers. Absolutely well past time for the appointment of special counsels to investigate, Clinton play-for-play, Benghazigate, Emailgate, and the unmasking, leaking, spying by Obama and his henchmen. What is stopping the GOP "leaders" from doing the right thing? Because many of them too are first and foremost "establishment" darlings and, second, are virulently anti-Trump. We're in very deep trouble, folks, and I'm not sure we can peacefully find our way out of this abyss.