Graham wrote:
>
> The HTML code given for valid CSS fails the Bobby check because the
> height and width attributes are not stated directly but given in a
> style. Perhaps you and "Bobby" need to get your heads together?
>
It seems to me that if Bobby complains about that, then Bobby is
simply wrong.
Height and width attributes can be a barrier to accessibility, because
they trigger a bug in many graphical browsers causing ALT attributes
not to be rendered when image loading is off. But I don't see how
absence of them can ever be an accessibility issue. How does
Bobby justify it (if indeed that's what it's complaining of)?
--
Nick Kew