Republicans may have majorities in the House and Senate, but the
only group they seem to care about pleasing are the Democrat
minorities. As the next funding deadline approaches, Republicans in
Congress are working on a $1.3 trillion spending bill that includes
all kinds of provisions that fly in the face of campaign promises,
principles, and even their party’s platform.

Readers, beware: Rachel has compiled a very long list. Among the
items is one we've followed on and off over the past few years:

Restoration of the Export-Import Bank

The fate of the Ex-Im Bank has been a rare
win for conservatives who fought Obama tooth and nail over
bank’s corporate welfare. By keeping the bank devoid of the quorum
necessary to make million-dollar loans to huge corporations like
Boeing, Caterpillar and the like, conservatives have managed to keep
the bank’s cronyism largely at bay. Enter the Republican majorities,
who are reportedly
planning to pass a provision lowering the quorum requirements for
the bank to approve loans. Looks like Iran may get those taxpayer
funded Boeing jets after
all.

Well, that sucks.

My problem: who do I gripe to about this? Both my state's senators and my
congresscritter are Democrats. They'll just cackle at me.

I could write to the national GOP and threaten to withhold my
heretofore generous contributions. Problem: my contribution to GOP
has been $0.00 for a long time. (Wait! Did I contribute to the Rand Paul
campaign? Maybe! Oh, wait, that's probably a negative for the
rest of the party.)

Another item on Rachel's list is also criticized in the WSJ
editorial (and perhaps paywalled) page:
The
GOP’s Internet Tax.

Republicans have spent the last year cutting taxes and regulations,
which hasn’t been easy. But now some Members of Congress want to
blunt their handiwork by passing an online sales tax. Yes, they
actually believe this would be good policy and politics.

A large faction of House Republicans are pressing GOP leaders to
attach legislation to the omnibus spending bill that would let
states collect sales tax from remote online retailers. South Dakota
Rep. Kristi Noem’s legislation, which has 50 co-sponsors, would let
some 12,000 jurisdictions conscript out-of-state retailers into
collecting sales and use taxes from their customers. A bipartisan
companion bill in the Senate has 27 co-sponsors.

This doesn't directly impact New Hampshire residents, although it's a kick in
the teeth for any and all less-than-Amazon-sized businesses with
nationwide retail sales.

At NR, Jonah Goldberg notes the announced retirement of
Arthur Brooks at the American Enterprise Institute:
The
Coming End of an Era.

Arthur Brooks is a strange creature by Washington standards. Heck he’s a strange creature by bipedal standards. A former French horn player who decided to be an egghead late in life, he is a unique mix of Catholic piety, data obsession, sartorial connoisseurism, physical fitness, old-soul wisdom and basic decency. He reminds me of William F. Buckley in several ways. But at the top of the list: He shares Bill’s commitment to good manners, and, for a guy who seemingly knows everything, he is remarkably interested in the opinions of others. (The Arthur you hear in this podcast I did with him is the Arthur I know).

Waaay back in 2014 I heard him speak at the
NH
Freedom Summit; he had the most compelling talk of the day, and
that was from a list of speakers that included four then-sitting
senators, three congresscritters, an ex-governor, a talk-show host,
and … oh yeah, Donald Trump.

A profoundly decent human being, a true mensch. I wish him
well in his future endeavors.

That characterization struck me
for some reason. Lord of the Flies, as I remember it, was all about
tribalism. In the case of the kids in the book, it was a reversion
to primitive tribalism (even though we recognize that in their
former more modern school life, they were members of tribes of sort
as well).

In this case, the tribe in question is the left and they’ve stolen the
conch shell and have exploited the anti-gun sentiments of these kids
mercilessly. And to their detriment too, I believe. These teens
quickly went from “authentic” in their rage and angst to obviously
coached and spouting left-wing anti-gun talking points. Whatever
[cachet] they owned by being at the scene of the murders and surviving it was quickly squandered by the obvious source of their talking points and the broadening of their protest to anything conservative.

And Democrat operatives and MSM coverage (but I repeat myself) fall
over themselves with paeans to this clown show.

Democratic National Committee spokesperson Michael Tyler announced Thursday that all candidates who run in the 2020 presidential election as Democrats will completely forego armed security for the entirety of their campaigns, in a clear and bold stance against gun violence in America.

“We’ve talked to all possible candidates and everyone has agreed. Gun violence is a huge issue in our country, and guns are the problem. So whoever runs for president as a Democrat in 2020—be it Bernie, Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Jerry Brown, and/or whoever else throws their hat in the ring—they will steadfastly refuse to employ security teams who carry scary firearms.”

Yes, in case you haven't already guessed: the Babylon Bee.

Janice Brown announces: Cow
Hampshire is 12. No excerpts (Janet disapproves of them) but I
encourage you to check it out.

Disclaimers:
Unquoted opinions expressed herein are solely those of the
blogger.

Pun Salad is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates
Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a
means for the blogger to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.