Dan stated in the last Dev Hangout that they have pretty much concluded they will not be making PTS DPOS-based. Can't say I agree with that move, but they are likely doing it because they do not want to anger the mining community who has been quite vocal about this stuff in the past. Just my take...

I am personally holding PTS and wondering why someone would want to honor an inferior (bitcoin-based) coin over something with DPOS + TITAN.

Dan stated in the last Dev Hangout that they have pretty much concluded they will not be making PTS DPOS-based. Can't say I agree with that move, but they are likely doing it because they do not want to anger the mining community who has been quite vocal about this stuff in the past. Just my take...

I am personally holding PTS and wondering why someone would want to honor an inferior (bitcoin-based) coin over something with DPOS + TITAN.

Once the exchanges figure out how to integrate with BTS X, then it should be relatively easy for them to integrate a PTS upgrade or even PTS on BTS X. The primary argument for not changing things is that it keeps all the eggs out of one basket.

Logged

For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.orgAnything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else. These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

if PTS pow Change into dpos+titana new client softwareid must registered again

if it is possibe put PTS into BTS as soon as possible?the price of PTS is so frustrating now$ 3.59

then we can trade pts-bts in bitsharesx instead of exchange pts-cny-bts pts-btc-bts

How about the ability for delegates or anyone else to reinvest a specified percentage of their profits into any selected BitAsset?

Suppose a delegate wants to reinvest 100% of his or her profits to go directly into PTS? This should be possible. It should also be possible for a delegate or any user to reinvest a specific percentage of anything to anything else.

Dan stated in the last Dev Hangout that they have pretty much concluded they will not be making PTS DPOS-based. Can't say I agree with that move, but they are likely doing it because they do not want to anger the mining community who has been quite vocal about this stuff in the past. Just my take...

I am personally holding PTS and wondering why someone would want to honor an inferior (bitcoin-based) coin over something with DPOS + TITAN.

Once the exchanges figure out how to integrate with BTS X, then it should be relatively easy for them to integrate a PTS upgrade or even PTS on BTS X. The primary argument for not changing things is that it keeps all the eggs out of one basket.

I thought keyhotee will be the itunes&appstorenow BitsharesX may be can take the place of keyhotee

uniform id system uniform branduniform UI sytle

memo can evolve into bitChat pay some bts ,you get some Network traffic

PTS needs some help and I hoped it would be DPOS. Keeping the miners in the loop is a poor reason for letting PTS decline. Let the miners mine something else and sell it on exchanges for PTS, which is what the other POS coin developers push their folks to do.

PTS needs some help and I hoped it would be DPOS. Keeping the miners in the loop is a poor reason for letting PTS decline. Let the miners mine something else and sell it on exchanges for PTS, which is what the other POS coin developers push their folks to do.

The quote below seems like it clarifies. DPOS is still in testing to a large degree, so it makes sense not to convert it (yet). The drop in price may even reflect the fact that it has not been converted to DPOS...of course this is just speculation.

Dan stated in the last Dev Hangout that they have pretty much concluded they will not be making PTS DPOS-based. Can't say I agree with that move, but they are likely doing it because they do not want to anger the mining community who has been quite vocal about this stuff in the past. Just my take...

I am personally holding PTS and wondering why someone would want to honor an inferior (bitcoin-based) coin over something with DPOS + TITAN.

Once the exchanges figure out how to integrate with BTS X, then it should be relatively easy for them to integrate a PTS upgrade or even PTS on BTS X. The primary argument for not changing things is that it keeps all the eggs out of one basket.

Yes, thanks for the explanations. I find them a little inconsistent. But that is the nature of a fast-growing system, where ideas are often replaced even before they can become reality. I've also read elsewhere that they are thinking of floating PTS on BTSX. That would be an improvement, but I prefer having a separate currency out there which brings others into this ecosystem. PTS can remain that separate currency; I'm just not in favor of continuing the mining when it is such a waste of resources (and when a much better alternative existed, that was developed in house).

That should be a broken basket, first of all, until PTS is fixed. So yes, some of the eggs will fall and break. But I'd say all the developments and talk related to BTSX has hijacked PTS' chances this week. People are selling one to get the other. Nothing wrong with DNS and Vote, but you've got the future of banking on the other side, selling for peanuts and about to explode.

So, if I could find it, I'd show a picture of a kid dropping a chicken egg to get a chocolate egg. Duh!

That should be a broken basket, first of all, until PTS is fixed. So yes, some of the eggs will fall and break. But I'd say all the developments and talk related to BTSX has hijacked PTS' chances this week. People are selling one to get the other. Nothing wrong with DNS and Vote, but you've got the future of banking on the other side, selling for peanuts and about to explode.

So, if I could find it, I'd show a picture of a kid dropping a chicken egg to get a chocolate egg. Duh!

Where are liondani and/or Stan when you need them....

Logged

Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

That should be a broken basket, first of all, until PTS is fixed. So yes, some of the eggs will fall and break. But I'd say all the developments and talk related to BTSX has hijacked PTS' chances this week. People are selling one to get the other. Nothing wrong with DNS and Vote, but you've got the future of banking on the other side, selling for peanuts and about to explode.

So, if I could find it, I'd show a picture of a kid dropping a chicken egg to get a chocolate egg. Duh!

Where are liondani and/or Stan when you need them....

Logged

Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract of any kind. These are merely my opinions which I reserve the right to change at any time.