We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.

They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...

You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You sound confused. Bannon just said Don Jr. is a "Patriot and a good man."

No you sound confused. Because he also said he was in some greasy shirt. He’s said lots of things. We’ll see what he says before Congress.

Be patient Cap’n. This is just getting started.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Better start chilling the ice pack.

_________________“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”

The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.

1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.

It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.

The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.

1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.

It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.

Has Bannon denied making the "treasonous" statement? Or the statements about JK and his greasy excrement? He's walked them back, but I don't believe he's denied making them.

The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.

1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.

It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.

That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.

The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.

1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.

It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.

That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.

please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes

The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.

1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.

It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.

That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.

please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false. Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.

1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.

It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.

That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.

please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false. Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it

It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.

That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.

please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false. Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.

That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.

please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false. Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false. Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure

What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?

please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false. Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure

What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?

You're a trip, DC. Tell us again how the Trump Dossier should be taken as gospel unless he can disprove it, or whatever garbage you were spouting at the time. I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false. Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure

What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?

You're a trip, DC. Tell us again how the Trump Dossier should be taken as gospel unless he can disprove it, or whatever garbage you were spouting at the time. I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.

The next time I tell you how the dossier should be taken as gospel, will be the first time I've said that. You should let the savvy posters, and the not so savvy posters, handle all things related to this board, because you are clueless about 100% of what happens here.

I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.

I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.

That's a genetic trait. You just outed your family as having a small set of jewels.

I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.

I’d call that a faulty conclusion. One has nothing to do with the other. Miles saying he’d leave it to others to track down old archived posts doesn’t in any way mean he cannot himself. It means exactly what he said...that he’d leave it to others. Motive is assumed.

please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false. Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure

What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?

from the remarks I have seen those are his opinions, I have no idea of knowing what Bannon beleives or not

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum