Pages

Friday, February 3, 2017

U.S. Health Insurance Is Upside Down

Writing
in The Week, Ryan Cooper shares a
chilling story about an Obamacare Gold-level health insurance policy that let
its beneficiary down when he needed it most:

Stewart is 29
years old, and was pursuing his Ph.D in American history at Texas Christian
University until ill health forced him to withdraw. He lives in Ft. Worth,
Texas, with his wife of six years, who is a junior high school teacher in a
low-income district. They own their home. Before he came down with
complications from cirrhosis caused by autoimmune hepatitis, he says he led a
scrupulously healthy lifestyle — he does not drink or do any other non-medical
drugs, he says, and was a devoted hiker before disaster struck. And he was
insured — indeed, he had a gold plan from the ObamaCare exchanges, the
second-best level of plan that you can get.

But now he faces
imminent bankruptcy and possibly death.

(Ryan Cooper, “This
is How American Health Care Kills People,” The
Week, January 14, 2017.)

This exactly the type of catastrophic
illness for which insurance should pay. Why does it not?

Liver failure is not
usually associated with people who live healthy lifestyles – quite the
opposite. However, other than a small variation in premium for tobacco use,
insurers are forbidden from “discriminating” against those who abuse drugs or
alcohol in favor of those who are struck with liver disease for other reasons.
(Although not described in the article, this may be a genetic predisposition).

So, insurers do the best they can to limit
benefits for liver disease, despite legal and regulatory attempts to prevent
them from doing so. Why are laws and regulations not very effective at addressing
this perverse outcome?

The proportion of people in circumstances
like Stewart’s is very small, not really a powerful political constituency.
Instead of allowing a market for health insurance that indemnifies
beneficiaries from financially catastrophic costs, politicians prefer to
promise citizens “free” benefits which most citizens expect to use relatively
constantly. Instead of hard data on health outcomes for expensive and deadly
diseases, research produced in support of the health benefits of Medicaid tends
to report increased access to dentists and vaccinations, which is self-reported
by dependents in telephone surveys.

As long as we allow politicians to design
health insurance, the sickest patients will suffer most.