Dedicated to the advancement of the State of Indiana by re-affirming our state's constitutional principles that: all people are created equal; no religious test shall be imposed on our public officials and offices of trust; and no special privileges or immunities shall be granted to any class of citizens which are not granted on the same terms to all citizens.
Advance Indiana, LLC. Copyright 2005-16. All rights reserved.

Sunday, August 08, 2010

Fox News Sunday Checks Out Daniels

Although Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace billed Gov. Mitch Daniels as one of the prime contenders for president in 2012 during an appearance on the show this morning, Daniels insists he remains focused on his work as Indiana governor and has no current plans to run for president, noting he has turned down many invitations to speak in places like Iowa and New Hampshire, early testing grounds for a national campaign. Wallace opened his questioning of Daniels by noting Indiana has added 46,000 new jobs this year--nearly three times the rate of national job growth and ended the most recent fiscal year with an $830 million surplus.

Daniels told Wallace spending is the number one issue. He said the state was facing bankruptcy when he took office and he's done the things necessary to control government spending, actually bringing down per capita spending during the time he has been governor. He says he has brought about these spending restraints without compromising services, which he describes as being better, not worse. I'm not sure Indiana's unemployed or welfare recipients will agree that the state is doing a better job delivering those services in light of a plethora of recent damaging state news reports on both.

Wallace hit Daniels on his record as OMB Director for President George W. Bush. You inherited a $236 billion surplus from Clinton Wallace said but left three years later with a $400 billion deficit. Daniels blamed the deficit spending on the recession following the 9/11 attacks without mentioning the costs of the Iraq War, which he pegged at the time as being about $50 billion dollar. Nearly $1 trillion has been spent on that war over the last decade.

Daniels defended the Bush tax cuts, which are set to expire this year. "Why raise taxes in the middle of a recession?" he asked. He said we need a national policy that encourages investment. Instead of more federal stimulus spending, he said we need an "emergency program to encourage investment." He suggested placing a moratorium on government regulations or speeding up government approvals to kick start the economy. He thinks the president needs impoundment authority similar to what he has in Indiana to reduce out-of-control federal spending.

Daniels told Wallace he believes federal entitlement programs like social security and Medicare must be fundamentally changed. Means testing and raising eligibility ages were two suggestions he made for cutting the costs of those programs, ideas that may not sit well with many hard-working Americans who have made maximum contributions to support those systems all of their lives only to be told in retirement they won't get anything in return as had been promised to them their entire working lives regardless of their station in life.

Wallace tried unsuccessfully to bait Daniels regarding his 2012 presidential ambitions. He insisted he has no plans to start raising money or otherwise organizing a presidential campaign. He said he is entirely focused on his job as governor of Indiana. That's not to say he isn't talking about national issues though. He insisted the country must face the "Republic threatening dimension" of our current fiscal policies. At one point, Daniels likened the onerous national debt to child abuse.

On an image note, Daniels wore a particularly bland looking, long-sleeved oxford shirt sans tie for his appearance this morning.

11 comments:

Daniels is full of it. His and Stevie's G's (I mean Ballard) public-private partnership and privatization nonsense is nothing but a transfer of wealth from their general public to their corporate benefactors. As for Social Security, he should not just talk about means testing, he should reject all SS and medicare for himself and his family - lead by example Mitch.

He falls into the same sphere as the rest of the ridiculous so-called potential Presidential candidates who are posturing, lying and stealing their way to the top of the heap.

Can't disagree with your point re lead by example on SS. As far as a general "transfer of wealth", what's an example besides the failed FSSA program and it's cousin, the IPALCO stock fiasco? I'll spot you those two.

In contrast, the governor reduced spending when we didn't have the tax revenue. Compare that to the fiscal reality in many other states. Our Federal and City public servants seem to believe that with 10% unemployment and more taxes coming next year, it's a dandy time to expand entitlements and give more money to the Pacers.

If somebody's got a better idea than Daniels, I'm all ears. The Presidential bar is set mighty low for now.

Can you imagine the image of Daniels standing next to Obama? It will be Bush-Dukakis, Part 2.

Obama will have in Daniels an easy punching bag on whom he can lay all of the problems he's trying to correct. Right on stage will be the source of all the problems the Obama administration faced when it came into office.

People voted out the Bush administration. Bringing the Bush administration back to the debate will give Obama a very easy foil.

Daniels missed his chance. He should have run for Bayh's seat.

This discussion neatly underscores that the Republicans have no emerging talent. If you try to rise in the Republican Party, you won't get anywhere unless you're a corporatist, and the principled Republican, the average man on the street, despises government-for-profit.

Indy Student, Daniels does know that the vast bulk of governance, and the greatest weight of governmental authority, is to be done by and resides in the Legislative Branch, right?

I'll answer my own question. No, he doesn't. This authoritarian streak and desire for unicameral government infected the Bush administration. The Republicans inverted the proper relationship of the President to Congress.

If we want to quibble over choice in what to cut, why, how much or how little of a real "net" cut, with how much credit that needs to go to bipartisan cooperation, blah, blah,... Fair enough- we can quibble over some of it.

As imperfect as the guy is, I think Daniels tried to reduce spending at a time when that needed to happen.

SUPPORT ADVANCE INDIANA

It takes many hours of time to publish content for Advance Indiana. If you enjoy reading the content of this blog, please help out by contributing. You can click on the "Make A Donation" button below to support Advance Indiana by using PayPal. Thanks to all of those readers who have made contributions in the past and continue to support this blog with your contributions. If you would rather support the blog using an alternative source of payment or would like to advertise on this blog, e-mail me at gwelsh@indy.rr.com for more information.

Blogflux

Subscribe To

Comment Policy

Advance Indiana allows you to post comments via this blog subject to the guidelines set forth herein. You understand that any comments you post are your own and are not those of Advance Indiana. You further understand that Advance Indiana is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced in your comments. Unlawful, harassing, defamatory, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, racially offensive, or otherwise objectionable comments are not acceptable. If you think any content posted or otherwise included in Advance Indiana violates the guidelines set forth herein, then please alert Advance Indiana.
Advance Indiana reserves the right to pre-screen, edit, and remove any post as it deems appropriate. You specifically acknowledge that Advance Indiana has no obligation to display any post submitted or otherwise provided via Advance Indiana.