Components of Participating Organizations
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), (http://www.nidcr.nih.gov).

Title:Oral Health Promotion Research across the Lifespan (R01)

Announcement TypeNew

Update: The following update relating to this announcement has been issued:

December 01, 2009 -
This FOA has been updated to reflect the new requirements from NIH’s Enhancing Peer Review Initiative. The new requirements are effective for submissions intended for due dates January 25, 2010 and beyond. If submitting an application intended for a due date of January 25, 2010 and beyond, follow the guidance below and be sure to use the Adobe-Forms-B version of the application forms and instructions. If applying for a due date before January 25, 2010, follow the guidance in the archived version of this FOA and be sure to use the Adobe-Forms-A version of the application forms and instructions.

NOTICE: Applications submitted in response to this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) for Federal assistance must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov (http://www.grants.gov) using the SF424 Research and Related (R&R) forms and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

APPLICATIONS MAY NOT BE SUBMITTED IN PAPER FORMAT.

This FOA must be read in conjunction with the application guidelines included with this announcement in Grants.gov/Apply for Grants (hereafter called Grants.gov/Apply).

A registration process is necessary before submission and applicants are highly encouraged to start the process at least four weeks prior to the grant submission date. See Section IV.

Purpose. This funding opportunity announcement (FOA) is intended to encourage the development, implementation and testing of oral health promotion interventions directed at improving oral health across the lifespan. The research team must include someone with extensive experience in health promotion, behavioral and /or social science research. The health promotion intervention must be based on a previously conducted assessment of the epidemiology, social, behavioral and /or environmental factors related to the disease or condition under study. The assessment could have been funded by NIDCR or other sources. This research on prevention of oral diseases or reduction of health disparities could focus in any of the following areas: 1) maternal and child health, 2) adolescent and young adult health and 3) the health of adults with complex diseases. The studies in response to this announcement would: a) apply or adapt existing behavioral or health promotion theories and planning research models to known risk factors and lifestyle aspects of oral diseases and conditions, b) promote optimal oral health of individuals, families and communities in the context of overall health and co-morbidities, and/or c) integrate oral health promotion into general health promotion programs. For clinical trials see http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/ClinicalTrials.

Mechanism of support. This FOA will utilize the NIH Research Project Grant (R01) award mechanism and runs in parallel with an FOA of identical scientific scope, PA-07-223 and PAR-07-224, which solicits applications under the R21 mechanisms.

Funds available and Anticipated Number of Awards. Because the nature and scope of the proposed research will vary from application to application, it is anticipated that the size and duration of each award will also vary. The total amount awarded and the number of awards will depend upon the mechanism numbers, quality, duration, and costs of the applications received.

Eligible Project Directors/Principal Investigators (PDs/PIs): Individuals with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research are invited to work with their institution/organization to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH support.

Number of Applications. Applicants may submit more than one application, provided each application is scientifically distinct.

Renewals and Resubmissions. Applications can be renewed by competing for additional project periods. Applicants may submit a resubmission application, but such application must include an Introduction addressing the previous peer review critique (Summary Statement).

Number of PDs/PIs. More than one PD/PI, or multiple PDs/PIs, may be designated on the application.

The goal of health promotion research is to develop and test approaches and interventions that improve and promote health and prevent diseases of individuals, families and communities including those with health disparities. Specifically, health promotion research explores approaches that if successful will enable people and communities to influence or control determinants of health to prevent diseases and promote health. It requires a thorough understanding of the role and interactions of complex social, cultural, behavioral, environmental, biological and other determinants of health and health problems. While health promotion interventions are wide-ranging and may draw upon health services and health policy research, this FOA is focused on behavioral, clinical, social, educational or combined approaches for the general population or for those with health disparities. In addition this research can focus on health determinants that relate to more than one disease or condition, and determinants that strengthen the overall health of individuals and groups such as appropriate diet and prevention of tobacco use. The outcomes of this research will help individuals, families, communities, health care practitioners and institutions support practices and lifestyles that offer optimal health and well-being.

This funding opportunity announcement (FOA) is intended to encourage the development of oral health promotion research directed at improving oral health across the lifespan. This research on the prevention of oral diseases and/or their sequelae could focus on any of the following areas: 1) maternal and child health, 2) adolescent and young adult health and 3) the health of adults with complex diseases in the general population or those with health disparities.

Background

A) Maternal and Child Health

The general and oral health of mothers and their children is closely intertwined. For example, there is evidence that heavy smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of cleft lip and palate. Cleft lip and cleft palate are reported in 1 of 1,000 live births, making it one of the most common birth defects. In addition, Streptococcus mutans, the bacteria associated with dental caries, is transmitted from caregiver (mostly the mother) to the child. Control of the bacterial transmission would help reduce the possibility of the infant developing early childhood caries. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 1999-2002, indicate that 28% of children ages 2 to 5 years have dental caries and that 20% have untreated tooth decay. Disparities exist for those children who are poor or from minority racial/ethnic backgrounds. NHANES 1999-2002 data indicate that for children aged 2-11 years, 55% of Mexican-American and 43% of non-Hispanic black children have dental caries in primary teeth versus 38% in non-Hispanic whites. Poor children are nearly three times as likely to have untreated caries as those who are non-poor (36% vs. 13%, respectively). Also, some epidemiologic studies suggest an association between periodontal disease in the mother and adverse birth outcomes such as preterm delivery and infant low birth weight. Therefore, the mothers perception of oral health, and the barriers and motivations to seeking dental care must be assessed to adequately introduce preventive information on oral health prior, during and after pregnancy.

B) Adolescents and Young Adults

Maintaining oral health in adolescents and young adults is important but often challenging as they become less supervised and make independent decisions. During this period of life individuals are exposed to behaviors that may impact their dental, oral and craniofacial health. For example, this may include use of tobacco, playing sports without appropriate protective gear, and poor dietary practices. For instance, more than 4 million adolescents under the age of 18 in the United States smoke cigarettes. Cigarette smoking and use of other tobacco products are major risk factors for periodontal diseases and oral cancer. Most oral cancers are diagnosed in older aged individuals, but oral cancer prevention can start with individuals in this younger age group.

Dental caries has a prevalence of 49% in the primary dentition of 6-11 year olds and in the permanent dentition the figures are 20%, 50% and 68% for 6-11 year olds, 12-15 year olds and 16-19 year old, respectively. This situation could be improved upon with adequate access to disease prevention information and to disease-preventive treatments,in the case of dental caries examples are exposure to fluoride and the use of sealants on the occlusal surfaces. Among children and adolescents aged 6-19 years, 32% had one or more surfaces sealed on their permanent teeth. Disparities for adolescents and young adults mirror those for younger children and will require a broad array of health promotion approaches that appropriately address the specific social, biological, behavioral and environmental determinants of oral health in vulnerable communities and subgroups of the population. Another important concern for this age group is injury prevention related to sports. Many of the injuries occur in the oralfacial region and thus have a special relevance for oral health. Most of these injuries can be prevented by using the appropriate protective gear, a practice that is reinforced if appropriate policies are in placed.

C) Adults with Complex Diseases

NHANES 1999-2002 data show that most adults are retaining their teeth. In addition to coronal caries, root caries can develop in exposed root surfaces. The prevalence of root caries is particularly high in black non-Hispanics (41%) and Mexican Americans (36%) with 18% for white non-Hispanics. Adults are more prone to gingivitis and periodontal disease, 48% of adults aged 35 to 44 years have gingivitis and 22% have destructive periodontal disease. NHANESIII data demonstrate that race/ethnicity, education, and neighborhood characteristics are associated with periodontitis. Specifically, those with less than a high school education, and those living in poor neighborhoods are much more likely to have the disease than their more well off counterparts. Also, periodontal disease may be more extensive in individuals with diabetes.

Older adults may take prescription and over the counter drugs that decrease salivary flow and produce dry mouth or xerostomia. The inhibition of salivary flow increases the risk for oral diseases, such as dental caries, and fungal infections, such as oral candidiasis. Other possible causes of oral candidiasis are cancer chemotherapy or radiation to the head and neck region, deficiencies in the immune system and tobacco use.

Adults who use tobacco products and alcohol are at higher risk of developing oral cancer. The American Cancer Society estimates about 30,990 new cases (20,180 in men and 10,810 in women) of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer in the United States in 2006. The prognosis of these cancers is poor when detected at a late stage. Between 1990 and 1995, 36% of oral cancers were detected at the earliest stage, compared with 35% in 1995-2000. African American men and Puerto Ricans residing in New York City and the island are known to be at increased risk for these cancers. Currently, social marketing and health communication models are being used in two states to address oral cancer prevention and early detection among African-Americans. Such activities and othersfocused on providing oral cancer prevention and early detection education to health professionalsand people at high risk are needed.

Across the lifespan most dental diseases and conditions are preventable. Dental caries can be prevented with approaches such as fluoride, sealants and appropriate dietary practices. Periodontal diseases may be prevented and/or controlled with proper oral hygiene and by not using tobacco products. Similarly, oral cancer may be prevented in many by avoiding tobacco use, limiting alcohol consumption and eating a diet rich in fruit and vegetables. Determinants of health disparities are becoming better understood and offer additional health promotion approaches tailored to the community and population. Oral self-care practices, attitudes and knowledge are essential for designing and implementing the appropriate health promotion activities. The challenge remains in linking and enhancing the use of health promotion and disease prevention information and services by the public and providers and in integrating oral health into other health promotion programs.

Health Promotion

Health promotion strategies that are most likely to achieve the desired results must be grounded in theory. Examples of behavioral theories used in health promotion include those at an individual or intrapersonal level (stages of change, theory of planned behavior and precaution adoption model); interpersonal level (social cognitive theory) and community level (diffusion of innovation theory and communication theory). After identifying the nature of the behavior then planning models are useful for the development, implementation and testing of interventions. Examples of planning models used in health promotion are: PRECEDE-PROCEED and social marketing. In addition, health promotion theories are emerging particularly for reducing health disparities in vulnerable populations and communities. The involvement of communities is essential to health promotion research and may include community-based participatory research.

Scope and objectives

This funding opportunity announcement (FOA) is intended to encourage the development, implementation and testing of oral health promotion interventions directed at improving oral health across the lifespan and may focus on those populations with health disparities. The research team must include someone with extensive experience in health promotion, environmental, behavioral and /or social science research. The health promotion intervention must be based on a previously conducted assessment of the epidemiology, social, behavioral and /or environmental factors related to the disease or condition to study. The assessment could have been funded by NIDCR or other sources. This research on prevention of oral diseases and/or their sequelae could focus in any of the following areas: 1) maternal and child health, 2) adolescent and young adult health and 3) the health of adults with complex diseases and may be focused on those populations with health disparities. The studies in response to this announcement would: a) apply or adapt existing behavioral or health promotion theories and planning research models to known risk factors and lifestyle aspects of oral diseases and conditions, b) promote optimal oral health of individuals, families and communities in the context of overall health and co-morbidities, and/or c) integrate oral health promotion into general health promotion programs.

The following examples are not meant to be inclusive or restrictive. Applications on other areas not explicitly listed below but that fall within the goals of this FOA are welcomed.

Studies that include innovative approaches involving families, social networks, communities or neighborhoods and that are designed to enhance behaviors promoting and improving oral health.

Specifically, if you are a U.S. organization and are submitting an application with direct costs in each year of $250,000 or less (excluding consortium Facilities and Administrative [F&A] costs), use the PHS398 Modular Budget component provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Package and SF424 (R&R) Application Guide (see specifically Section 3.4, Modular Budget Component, of the Application Guide).

U.S. applicants requesting more than $250,000 in annual direct costs and all foreign applicants must complete and submit budget requests using the Research & Related Budget component found in the application package for this FOA. See NOT-OD-06-096, August 23, 2006.

2. Funds Available

Because the nature and scope of the proposed research will vary from application to application, it is anticipated that the size and duration of each award will also vary. Although the financial plans of the Institutes and Centers provide support for this program, awards pursuant to this funding opportunity are contingent upon the availability of funds and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.

NIH grants policies as described in the NOT-OD-05-004, November 2, 2004.

NIDCR has not set aside funds for this FOA.

Section III. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible Applicants

1.A. Eligible Institutions

You may submit an application(s) if your institution/organization has any of the following characteristics:

Indian/Native American Tribal Government (Other than Federally Recognized)

Indian/Native American Tribally Designated Organization

Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entity (Foreign Organization)

Hispanic-serving Institution

Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)

Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs)

Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions

Regional Organization

Other(s): Eligible agencies of the Federal government; Faith-based or community based organizations.

1.B. Eligible Individuals

Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the PD/PI is invited to work with his/her organization to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH support.

More than one PD/PI, or multiple PDs/PIs, may be designated on the application for projects that require a team science approach that clearly does not fit the single-PD/PI model. Additional information on the implementation plans and policies and procedures to formally allow more than one PD/PI on individual research projects is available athttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/multi_pi. All PDs/PIs must be registered in the NIH eRA Commons prior to the submission of the application (seehttp://era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt/preparing.htmfor instructions).

The decision of whether to apply for a single PD/PI or multiple PD/PI grant is the responsibility of the investigators and applicant organizations and should be determined by the scientific goals of the project. Applications for multiple PD/PI grants will require additional information, as outlined in the instructions below. When considering multiple PDs/PIs, please be aware that the structure and governance of the PD/PI leadership team as well as the knowledge, skills and experience of the individual PD/PIs will be factored into the assessment of the overall scientific merit of the application. Multiple PDs/PIs on a project share the authority and responsibility for leading and directing the project, intellectually and logistically.Each PD/PI is responsible and accountable to the grantee organization, or, as appropriate, to a collaborating organization, for the proper conduct of the project or program, including the submission of required reports. For further information on multiple PDs/PIs, please seehttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/multi_pi.

Applicants may submit more than one application, provided each application is scientifically distinct.

Section IV. Application and Submission Information

Registration:
Appropriate registrations with Grants.gov and eRA Commons must be completed on or before the due date in order to successfully submit an application. Several of the steps of the registration process could take four weeks or more. Therefore, applicants should immediately check with their business official to determine whether their organization/institution is already registered with both Grants.gov and the Commons. All registrations must be complete by the submission deadline for the application to be considered �on-time� (see 3.C.1 for more information about on-time submission).

The individual(s) designated as PDs/PIs on the application must also be registered in the NIH eRA Commons.In the case of multiple PDs/PIs, all PDs/PIs must be registered and be assigned the PI role in the eRA Commons prior to the submission of the application.

Each PD/PI must hold a PD/PI account in the Commons. Applicants should not share a Commons account for both an Authorized Organization Representative/Signing Official (AOR/SO) role and a PD/PI role; however, if they have both a PD/PI role and an Internet Assisted Review (IAR) role, both roles should exist under one Commons account.

When multiple PDs/PIs are proposed, all PDs/PIs at the applicant organization must be affiliated with that organization.PDs/PIs located at another institution need not be affiliated with the applicant organization, but must be affiliated with their own organization to be able to access the Commons.

This registration/affiliation must be done by the AOR/SO or their designee who is already registered in the Commons.

Both the PD/PI(s) and AOR/SO need separate accounts in the NIH eRA Commons since both are authorized to view the application image.

Note that if a PD/PI is also an NIH peer-reviewer with an Individual DUNS and CCR registration, that particular DUNS number and CCR registration are for the individual reviewer only. These are different than any DUNS number and CCR registration used by an applicant organization. Individual DUNS and CCR registration should be used only for the purposes of personal reimbursement and should not be used on any grant applications submitted to the Federal Government.

Several of the steps of the registration process could take four weeks or more. Therefore, applicants should immediately check with their business official to determine whether their organization/institution is already registered in both Grants.gov and the Commons. The NIH will accept electronic applications only from organizations that have completed all necessary registrations.

1. Request Application Information

Applicants must download the SF424 (R&R) application forms and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide for this FOA through Grants.gov/Apply.

Note: Only the forms package directly attached to a specific FOA can be used. You will not be able to use any other SF424 (R&R) forms (e.g., sample forms, forms from another FOA), although some of the "Attachment" files may be useable for more than one FOA.

Prepare all applications using the SF424 (R&R) application forms and in accordance with the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide for this FOA through Grants.gov/Apply.

The SF424 (R&R) Application Guide is critical to submitting a complete and accurate application to NIH. There are fields within the SF424 (R&R) application components that, although not marked as mandatory, are required by NIH (e.g., the Credential log-in field of the Research & Related Senior/Key Person Profile component must contain the PD/PIs assigned eRA Commons User ID). Agency-specific instructions for such fields are clearly identified in the Application Guide. For additional information, see Frequently Asked Questions Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.

The SF424 (R&R) application has several components. Some components are required, others are optional. The forms package associated with this FOA in Grants.gov/APPLYincludes all applicable components, required and optional. A completed application in response to this FOA includes the data in the following components:

Format: Every effort should be made to comply with the format specifications, which are based upon a standard U.S. paper size of 8.5 x 11 within each PDF.

Funds for up to 8% administrative costs (excluding equipment) may be requested. SeeNOT-OD-01-028, March 29, 2001.

Organizations must comply with Federal/NIH policies on human subjects, animals, and biohazards.

Organizations must comply with Federal/NIH biosafety and biosecurity regulations. See Section VI.2., Administrative and National Policy Requirements.

Proposed research should provide special opportunities for furthering research programs through the use of unusual talent, resources, populations, or environmental conditions in other countries that are not readily available in the United States or that augment existing U.S. resources.

Information for the Contact PD/PI should be entered in Item 13 of the SF424 (R&R) Cover component.All other PDs/PIs should be listed in the Research & Related Senior/Key Person component and assigned the project role of PD/PI.Please remember that all PDs/PIs must be registered in the eRA Commons prior to application submission.The Commons ID of each PD/PI must be included in the Credential field of the Research & Related Senior/Key Person component.Failure to include this data field will cause the application to be rejected.

All projects proposing Multiple PDs/PIs will be required to include a new section describing the leadership of the project.

Multiple PD/PI Leadership Plan: For applications designating multiple PDs/PIs, a new section of the research plan, entitled Multiple PD/PI Leadership Plan, must be included. A rationale for choosing a multiple PD/PI approach should be described. The governance and organizational structure of the leadership team and the research project should be described, including communication plans, process for making decisions on scientific direction, and procedures for resolving conflicts.The roles and administrative, technical, and scientific responsibilities for the project or program should be delineated for the PDs/PIs and other collaborators.

If budget allocation is planned, the distribution of resources to specific components of the project or the individual PDs/PIs should be delineated in the Leadership Plan. In the event of an award, the requested allocations may be reflected in a footnote on the Notice of Award.

Applications Involving a Single Institution

When all PDs/PIs are within a single institution, follow the instructions contained in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

Applications Involving Multiple Institutions

When multiple institutions are involved, one institution must be designated as the prime institution and funding for the other institution(s) must be requested via a subcontract to be administered by the prime institution. When submitting a detailed budget, the prime institution should submit its budget using the Research & Related Budget component.All other institutions should have their individual budgets attached separately to the Research & Related Subaward Budget Attachment(s) Form.See Section 4.8 of the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide for further instruction regarding the use of the subaward budget form.

When submitting a modular budget, the prime institution completes the PHS398 Modular Budget component only.Information concerning the consortium/subcontract budget is provided in the budget justification. Separate budgets for each consortium/subcontract grantee are note required when using the Modular budget format. See Section 3.4 of the Application Guide for further instruction regarding the use of the PHS398 Modular Budget component.

Applications may be submitted on or after the opening date and must be successfully received by Grants.gov no later than 5:00 p.m. local time(of the applicant institution/organization) on the application submission/receipt date(s). (See Section IV.3.A. for all dates.) If an application is not submitted by the receipt date(s) and time, the application may be delayed in the review process or not reviewed.

Once an application package has been successfully submitted through Grants.gov, any errors have been addressed, and the assembled application has been created in the eRA Commons, the PD/PI and the Authorized Organization Representative/Signing Official (AOR/SO) have two business days to view the application image.

If everything is acceptable, no further action is necessary. The application will automatically move forward for processing by the Division of Receipt and Referral, Center for Scientific Review, NIH, after two business days.

Prior to the submission deadline, the AOR/SO can Reject the assembled application and submit a changed/corrected application within the two day viewing window. This option should be used if the AOR/SO determines that warnings should be addressed or if information was lost or compromised during transmission. Reminder: warnings do not stop further application processing. If an application submission results in warnings (but no errors), it will automatically move forward after two business days if no action is taken. Please remember that some warnings may not be applicable or may need to be addressed after application submission.

If the two day window falls after the submission deadline, the AOR/SO will have the option to Reject the application if, due to an eRA Commons or Grants.gov system issue, the application does not correctly reflect the submitted application package (e.g., some part of the application was lost or did not transfer correctly during the submission process). The AOR/SO should first contact the eRA Commons Helpdesk to confirm the system error, document the issue, and determine the best course of action. NIH will not penalize the applicant for an eRA Commons or Grants.gov system issue.

If the AOR/SO chooses to Reject the image after the submission deadline for a reason other than an eRA Commons or Grants.gov system failure, a changed/corrected application still can be submitted but it will be subject to the NIH late policy guidelines and may not be accepted. The reason for this delay should be explained in the cover letter attachment.

Both the AOR/SO and PD/PI will receive e-mail notifications when the application is rejected or the application automatically moves forward in the process after two days.

Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness by the Center for Scientific Review, NIH. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed.

There will be an acknowledgement of receipt of applications from Grants.gov and the Commons. The submitting AOR receives the Grants.gov acknowledgments. The AOR and the PI receive Commons acknowledgments. Information related to the assignment of an application to a Scientific Review Group is also in the Commons.

Note: Since email can be unreliable, it is the responsibility of the applicant to check periodically on their application status in the Commons.

The NIH will not accept any application in response to this FOA that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial merit review unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. The NIH will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one already reviewed. This does not preclude the submission of an application already reviewed with substantial changes, but such application must include an Introduction addressing the previous critique. Note such an application is considered a "resubmission" for the SF424 (R&R).

All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

Pre-award costs are allowable. A grantee may, at its own risk and without NIH prior approval, incur obligations and expenditures to cover costs up to 90 days before the beginning date of the initial budget period of a new or competing renewal (formerly competing continuation) award if such costs: are necessary to conduct the project, and would be allowable under the grant, if awarded, without NIH prior approval. If specific expenditures would otherwise require prior approval, the grantee must obtain NIH approval before incurring the cost. NIH prior approval is required for any costs to be incurred more than 90 days before the beginning date of the initial budget period of a new or competing renewal award.

The incurrence of pre-award costs in anticipation of a competing or non-competing award imposes no obligation on NIH either to make the award or to increase the amount of the approved budget if an award is made for less than the amount anticipated and is inadequate to cover the pre-award costs incurred. NIH expects the grantee to be fully aware that pre-award costs result in borrowing against future support and that such borrowing must not impair the grantee's ability to accomplish the project objectives in the approved time frame or in any way adversely affect the conduct of the project. See the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

6. Other Submission Requirements

PD/PI Credential (e.g., Agency Login)

The NIH requires the PD/PI(s) to fill in his/her Commons User ID in the PROFILE Project Director/Principal Investigator section, Credential log-in field of the Research & Related Senior/Key Person Profile component.

Organizational DUNS

The applicant organization must include its DUNS number in its Organization Profile in the eRA Commons. This DUNS number must match the DUNS number provided at CCR registration with Grants.gov. For additional information, see Frequently Asked Questions Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.

PHS398 Research Plan Component Sections

Item 3 of the PHS398 Research Plan is limited to 12 pages.

All application instructions outlined in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide are to be followed, incorporating "Just-in-Time" information concepts, and with the following additional requirements:

Special Instructions for Modular Grant applications

R01 applications from U.S. institutions/organizations requesting up to $250,000 per year in direct costs (excluding consortium F&A costs) must be submitted in a modular budget format. Additional information on modular budgets is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm.When submitting a modular budget, the applicant organization will include only the PHS398 Modular Budget component.See Section 3.4 of the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide for further instructions regarding the use of the PHS398 Modular Budget component.

Foreign organizations may not submit modular budgets. See NOT-OD-06-096.

Special Instructions for Applications Requesting $500,000 (direct costs) or More Per Year

Applicants requesting $500,000 or more in direct costs for any year (excluding consortium F&A costs) must carry out the following steps:

1) Contact the IC program staff at least 6 weeks before submitting the application, i.e., as you are developing plans for the study;

2) Obtain agreement from the IC staff that the IC will accept your application for consideration for award; and,

3) Include the PHS398 Cover Letter component with the application to identify the staff member and IC who agreed to accept assignment of the application.

Do not use the Appendix to circumvent the page limitations. An application that does not observe the required page limitations may be delayed in the review process.

Foreign Applications (Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entity)

Indicate how the proposed project has specific relevance to the mission and objectives of the IC and has the potential for significantly advancing the health sciences in the United States.

Plan for Sharing Research Data

The precise content of the data-sharing plan will vary, depending on the data being collected and how the investigator is planning to share the data. Applicants who are planning to share data may wish to describe briefly the expected schedule for data sharing, the format of the final dataset, the documentation to be provided, whether or not any analytic tools also will be provided, whether or not a data-sharing agreement will be required and, if so, a brief description of such an agreement (including the criteria for deciding who can receive the data and whether or not any conditions will be placed on their use), and the mode of data sharing (e.g., under their own auspices by mailing a disk or posting data on their institutional or personal Web site, through a data archive or enclave). Investigators choosing to share under their own auspices may wish to enter into a data-sharing agreement. References to data sharing may also be appropriate in other sections of the application.

Applicants requesting more than $500,000 in direct costs in any year of the proposed research must include a plan for sharing research data in their application. The funding organization will be responsible for monitoring the data sharing policy (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing).

The reasonableness of the data sharing plan or the rationale for not sharing research data may be assessed by the reviewers. However, reviewers will not factor the proposed data sharing plan into the determination of scientific merit or the impact/priority score.

Sharing Research Resources

NIH policy expects that grant recipients make unique research resources readily available for research purposes to qualified individuals within the scientific community after publication (See the NIH Grants Policy Statementhttp://grants.nih.gov/archive/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/index.htm#_Toc54600131). Investigators responding to this funding opportunity should include a sharing research resources plan addressing how unique research resources will be shared or explain why sharing is not possible.

The adequacy of the resources sharing plan and any related data sharing plans will be considered by Program staff of the funding organization when making recommendations about funding applications. The effectiveness of the resource sharing will be evaluated as part of the administrative review of each Non-Competing Grant Progress Report (PHS 2590). See Section VI.3., Reporting.

Section V. Application Review Information

1. Criteria (Update: Enhanced review criteria have been issued for the evaluation of research applications received for potential FY2010 funding and thereafter - see NOT-OD-09-025).

Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process.

2. Review and Selection Process

Applications submitted for this funding opportunity will be assigned to the ICs on the basis of established PHS referral guidelines.

Undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of applications under review, will be discussed and assigned an impact/priority score.

Receive a written critique.

Receive a second level of review by the appropriate national advisory council or board.

Applications submitted in response to this funding opportunity will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:

Scientific merit of the proposed project as determined by peer review.

Availability of funds.

Relevance of program priorities.

The goals of NIH supported research are to advance our understanding of biological systems, to improve the control of disease, and to enhance health. In their written critiques, reviewers will be asked to comment on each of the following criteria in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each of these criteria will be addressed and considered in assigning the overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each application.

Significance

Approach

Innovation

Investigator

Environment

Note that an application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high impact/priority score. For example, an investigator may propose to carry out important work that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move a field forward.

Overall Impact. Reviewers will provide an overall impact/priority score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following five core review criteria, and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).

Core Review Criteria. Reviewers will consider each of the five review criteria below in the determination of scientific and technical merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.

Significance: Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?

Investigator(s): Are the PD/PI(s) and other key personnel appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level of the PD/PI(s) and other researchers? Do the PD/PI(s) and investigative team bring complementary and integrated expertise to the project (if applicable)?

Innovation: Does the application
challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms
by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies,
instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or
methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of
research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new
application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies,
instrumentation, or interventions proposed?

Approach: Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses
well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the
project? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for
success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development,
will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects
be managed?
If the project involves clinical research, are the plans for 1)
Protections for Human Subjects, and 2) inclusion of minorities and members
of both sexes/genders, as well as the inclusion of children, justified in
terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed? For
applications designating multiple PDs/PIs, is the leadership approach,
including the designated roles and responsibilities, governance and
organizational structure consistent with and justified by the aims of the
project and the expertise of each of the PDs/PIs?

Environment: Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements?

2.A. Additional Review Criteria

As applicable for the project
proposed, reviewers will consider the following additional items in the
determination of scientific and technical merit, but will not give separate
scores for these items.

Protections for Human Subjects. For
research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the six
categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will
evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed
protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the
following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection
against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance
of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical
trials.

For research that involves human subjects and meets
the criteria for one or more of the six categories of research that are exempt
under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the
exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of
materials.

Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children.
When the proposed project involves clinical research, the committee will
evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion of minorities and members of both
genders, as well as the inclusion of children.

Vertebrate Animals. The committee
will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the
scientific assessment according to the following five points: 1) proposed use of
the animals, and species, strains, ages, sex, and numbers to be used; 2)
justifications for the use of animals and for the appropriateness of the species
and numbers proposed; 3) adequacy of veterinary care; 4) procedures for limiting
discomfort, distress, pain and injury to that which is unavoidable in the
conduct of scientifically sound research including the use of analgesic,
anesthetic, and tranquilizing drugs and/or comfortable restraining devices; and
5) methods of euthanasia and reason for selection if not consistent with the
AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia.

Resubmission Applications. When
reviewing a Resubmission application (formerly called an amended application),
the committee will evaluate the application as now presented, taking into
consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review
group and changes made to the project.

Renewal Applications. When reviewing
a Renewal application (formerly called a competing continuation application),
the committee will consider the progress made in the last funding period.

Revision Applications. When
reviewing a Revision application (formerly called a competing supplement
application), the committee will consider the appropriateness of the proposed
expansion of the scope of the project. If the Revision application relates to a
specific line of investigation presented in the original application that was
not recommended for approval by the committee, then the committee will consider
whether the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group are
adequate and whether substantial changes are clearly evident.

Biohazards. Reviewers will assess
whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research
personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate
protection is proposed.

Additional Review Considerations

As applicable for the
project proposed, reviewers will address each of the following items, but will
not give scores for these items and should not consider them in providing an
overall impact score.

Budget and Period Support. Reviewers
will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully
justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.

Select Agents Research. Reviewers
will assess the information provided in this section of the application,
including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the
registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the
procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select
Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security
of the Select Agent(s).

Applications from Foreign Organizations.
Reviewers will assess whether the project presents special opportunities for
furthering research programs through the use of unusual talent, resources,
populations, or environmental conditions that exist in other countries and
either are not readily available in the United States or augment existing U.S.
resources.

A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization. The NoA signed by the grants management officer is the authorizing document. Once all administrative and programmatic issues have been resolved, the NoA will be generated via email notification from the awarding component to the grantee business official.

Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs. See Section IV.5., Funding Restrictions.

We encourage your inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall into three areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants management issues:

Human Subjects Protection:Federal regulations (45 CFR 46) require that applications and proposals involving human subjects must be evaluated with reference to the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained (http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm).

Sharing Research Data:Investigators submitting an NIH application seeking $500,000 or more in direct costs in any single year are expected to include a plan for data sharing or state why this is not possible (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing).

Investigators should seek guidance from their institutions, on issues related to institutional policies and local IRB rules, as well as local, State and Federal laws and regulations, including the Privacy Rule. Reviewers will consider the data sharing plan but will not factor the plan into the determination of the scientific merit or the impact/priority score.

Access to Research Data through the Freedom of Information Act:The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to provide access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1) first produced in a project that is supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2) cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency in support of an action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed through FOIA. It is important for applicants to understand the basic scope of this amendment. NIH has provided guidance at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm. Applicants may wish to place data collected under this funding opportunity in a public archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application should include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include information about this in the budget justification section of the application. In addition, applicants should think about how to structure informed consent statements and other human subjects procedures given the potential for wider use of data collected under this award.

Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children:It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their sub-populations must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research projects unless a clear and compelling justification is provided indicating that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43). All investigators proposing clinical research should read the "NIH Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html); a complete copy of the updated Guidelines is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm. The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of clinical research; updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB standards; clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials consistent with the SF424 (R&R) application; and updated roles and responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community. The policy continues to require for all NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials that: a) all applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of plans to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable; and b) investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group differences.

Inclusion of Children as Participants in Clinical Research:The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) must be included in all clinical research, conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them.

Required Education on the Protection of Human Subject Participants:NIH policy requires education on the protection of human subject participants for all investigators submitting NIH applications for research involving human subjects and individuals designated as key personnel. The policy is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html.

NIH Public Access Policy:NIH-funded investigators are requested to submit to the NIH manuscript submission (NIHMS) system (http://www.nihms.nih.gov/) at PubMed Central (PMC) an electronic version of the author's final manuscript upon acceptance for publication, resulting from research supported in whole or in part with direct costs from NIH. The author's final manuscript is defined as the final version accepted for journal publication, and includes all modifications from the publishing peer review process.

NIH is requesting that authors submit manuscripts resulting from 1) currently funded NIH research projects or 2) previously supported NIH research projects if they are accepted for publication on or after May 2, 2005. The NIH Public Access Policy applies to all research grant and career development award mechanisms, cooperative agreements, contracts, Institutional and Individual Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards, as well as NIH intramural research studies. The Policy applies to peer-reviewed, original research publications that have been supported in whole or in part with direct costs from NIH, but it does not apply to book chapters, editorials, reviews, or conference proceedings. Publications resulting from non-NIH-supported research projects should not be submitted.

For more information about the Policy or the submission process, please visit the NIH Public Access Policy Web site at http://publicaccess.nih.gov// and view the Policy or other Resources and Tools, including the Authors' Manual.

Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information:The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued final modification to the "Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information", the "Privacy Rule", on August 14, 2002. The Privacy Rule is a federal regulation under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 that governs the protection of individually identifiable health information, and is administered and enforced by the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR).

Decisions about applicability and implementation of the Privacy Rule reside with the researcher and his/her institution. The OCR website (http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/) provides information on the Privacy Rule, including a complete Regulation Text and a set of decision tools on "Am I a covered entity?" Information on the impact of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH processes involving the review, funding, and progress monitoring of grants, cooperative agreements, and research contracts can be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-025.html.

URLs in NIH Grant Applications or Appendices:
All applications and proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations. For publications listed in the appendix and/or Progress report, Internet addresses (URLs) or PubMed Central (PMC) submission identification numbers must be used for publicly accessible on-line journal articles.Publicly accessible on-line journal articles or PMC articles/manuscripts accepted for publication that are directly relevant to the project may be included only as URLs or PMC submission identification numbers accompanying the full reference in either the Bibliography & References Cited section, the Progress Report Publication List section, or the Biographical Sketch section of the NIH grant application. A URL or PMC submission identification number citation may be repeated in each of these sections as appropriate. There is no limit to the number of URLs or PMC submission identification numbers that can be cited.

Healthy People 2010:The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This FOA is related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.

Authority and Regulations:This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance at http://www.cfda.gov/ and is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people.

Loan Repayment Programs:NIH encourages applications for educational loan repayment from qualified health professionals who have made a commitment to pursue a research career involving clinical, pediatric, contraception, infertility, and health disparities related areas. The LRP is an important component of NIH's efforts to recruit and retain the next generation of researchers by providing the means for developing a research career unfettered by the burden of student loan debt. Note that an NIH grant is not required for eligibility and concurrent career award and LRP applications are encouraged. The periods of career award and LRP award may overlap providing the LRP recipient with the required commitment of time and effort, as LRP awardees must commit at least 50% of their time (at least 20 hours per week based on a 40 hour week) for two years to the research. For further information, please see: http://www.lrp.nih.gov/.