Thanks! (And thanks again to all who’ve already donated.) Now back to our regularly scheduled programming:So our old friend Heartiste, the reactionay PUA douchecanoe, is one of those racists who’s not only open about his racism, but actually proud of it; he thinks it’s backed up with SCIENCE. He’s become more obvious in his pandering to the so called “alt-right” racist crowd recently, but he’s sort of outdone himself in a recent post, playing to some rather primal racist fears of black male sexual potency.

In “The Wreck Of The Beta Male Cuckold,” Heartiste offers up a rather strained “parody” of Gordon Lightfoot’s “The Wreck of the Edmond Fitzgerald.” Instead of chronicling a real-life shipwreck, he offers up the tale of a fat, emasculated beta brony who sadly watches his wife have sex with a black man — sorry, a “darkie” — before retreating to the basement to commit suicide.

At least I think that’s what happens. It’s all so ineptly written it’s nearly incomprehensible in parts.

Here’s the beginning of the poem, which will perhaps give you some flavor of the rest:

The legend lives on from the Left Coast on down of the beta they called “Cuckold Freddie.”The cuck, it is said, sits alone near the bed when the thighs of his wife spread to darkies.

Yep. He really went with “darkies.” Elsewhere in the lyrics, Heartiste refers to the cuckolder as “mandingo,” and his penis as a “black mamba.”

Actually, let me quote that last bit, as it shows just how hard Heartiste has to strain to hit all the standard Manosphere talking points — and work in all his favorite manosphere catchphrases — in telling his tale of beta woe. Oh, by the way, the cuckolder refers to himself as “Bear.”

Cuckold suffering tolls, Hypergamy sings in the rooms of Freddie’s Mountain Dew mansion.Bear’s black mamba creams in his wife’s wet vajeen; Her asshole and mouth are for Bear’s fun. And farther below, Freddie’s marital ho takes in what Bear’s privilege can send her, And Freddie will know as all swinging alphas know it’s two women-one man not the inverse.

The whole thing is like that.

Heartiste, I’m sure, thinks of his little song parody as a devastating put down of (white) beta males, which he’s made even more humiliating by having the cuckolder in the story be a … black man!

But you don’t have to be a psychologist or a cultural historian to see the fear here.

White male panic over black male sexuality is hardly a new thing. Indeed, the Ku Klux Klan and its supporters regularly used trumped-up fears of “black brutes” raping white women as convenient excuses for campaigns of terror against blacks; they also indicated a deep uneasiness within white men about their own cultural and sexual potency.

Similar fears of a sexualized “Black Peril” arose amongst colonialist whites in the 19th and early 20th century, most notably in South Africa and what was then called Southern Rhodesia; these, too, provided a convenient excuse for government policies designed to control blacks and benefit white men. (Never mind that white men were far more likely to sexually abuse black women than black men were to abuse white women.)

In other words, there’s very little difference these days between a certain segment of the Manosphere and the Klan.

Not to mention that the way these “alphas” mock men who are being cuckolded is rooted in misogynistic ideas about women’s roles in (hetero) relationships and their motives for choosing partners. All this talk about “keeping” a woman and fretting over who she’s fucking is, at root, the fear that women are individual human beings with wills and desires of their own. (Again, not talking about your kink here, but about Heartiste and his ilk)

Well I can only speak for myself and that is I find people generally a lot more interesting when they’re free to do what they want (so long as it’s legal and non-harmful of course). As for men vs women in cuckolding, if anything it seems more men are into it than women but I can’t know for sure. It’s just my impression. A lot of guys just get really turned on by the idea that their wives/partners are getting banged by somebody else. Some even like to watch.
Rule of thumb: never try to categorize sexuality, unless you’re happy to have 7 billion categories.

The sad part is the singer seems like a decent enough musician, shame he’s wasting himself on this crap, but I admire his ability to get past the “Put a gag in his moth so he won’t direct” line with a straight face.

I think one of the things that damaged Roissy’s psyche so badly was that he was previously friends with a Black PUA and blogger who acted as his “wing-man”. I forget his name but he used to frequent Roissy’s blog in the early days. This guy obviously “pulled more poon” than Roissy and he hasn’t slept well since. Seeing how women from a wide variety of ethnic backgrounds chose to be with his black sidekick more than him has left an indelible mark on his heart, mind and soul.

Actually “Mandingo Parties” are a thing. And yes, that is what they are called!

I remember reading a news paper (yes an actual one) article about the growing popularity of this underground scene where white men would pay young black men to come to a house in the (often wealthier) suburbs and have sex with their wives while they watched. The provider of these men (a pimp I guess you could call him) said he scouted amongst black college students and recent immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean. These young men need money to get them through school or to establish themselves in their new country.

I remember when one of Roissy’s previous female beta orbiters, a Canadian girl named “Sofia”, wrote on her blog how one of the ways “white men are oppressed in the West” is by having interracial cuckold porn “forced” on them.

When asked who it was that was writing, directing, filming, casting, producing and purchasing/downloading such porn, she immediately deleted the comment and had the commenter permanently banned, without answering the question.

I think one of the things that damaged Roissy’s psyche so badly was that he was previously friends with a Black PUA and blogger who acted as his “wing-man”. I forget his name but he used to frequent Roissy’s blog in the early days. This guy obviously “pulled more poon” than Roissy and he hasn’t slept well since. Seeing how women from a wide variety of ethnic backgrounds chose to be with his black sidekick more than him has left an indelible mark on his heart, mind and soul.

A response to the musical performance of “The Wreck of the Beta Male Cuckold”….

The collaboration above is an example of how we leaderlessly organize into an effective division of labor — lyricist and performer — guided by the right ethos. Nobody commissioned that anthem, disparate parts came together spontaneously in freedom and the loose confederacy of an ethos.

Though it is a small example, such small victories are how revolutions rise and unite.

Despair is misplaced over how powerful and entrenched the enemy is. Interconnectedness means redundancy and instantaneous lines of communication. The enemy is a blundering monolith, we are minutemen.

Now add a touch of smart leadership and organization — flexibility within efficiency — and imagine the force-multiplying effect.

It baffles me to see men intimidated into non-action (poolside) by the mere shadow of “The Cathedral.” A few well-placed strikes and the facade comes down, and when the facade comes down, men will rally to the truth. We are choosing to be frightened by women and eunuchs.

All this from a song? No. From the song’s remarkable production. It is a sign of how much easier it will be than we think to produce the tools and the armies and the anthems to bring down the paper tiger.

For a dashed off piece of work, the song is an outstanding achievement. I didn’t bother to read through the poem until it was sung to me, and when I heard it matched to music, it was thrilling to witness something new and powerful come to life before my very eyes.

Congratulations to its creators: it is just that creative collaboration that will rally men together.

I remember reading a news paper (yes an actual one) article about the growing popularity of this underground scene where white men would pay young black men to come to a house in the (often wealthier) suburbs and have sex with their wives while they watched.

And the reason why this is so taboo and therefore exciting is – say it with me now – racism!

The provider of these men (a pimp I guess you could call him) said he scouted amongst black college students and recent immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean. These young men need money to get them through school or to establish themselves in their new country.

“if anything it seems more men are into it than women but I can’t know for sure”

In my experience I’ve met more cuckqueens (female equivalent of a cuckhold) than cuckholds..

@emilygoddess – “All this talk about “keeping” a woman and fretting over who she’s fucking is, at root, the fear that women are individual human beings with wills and desires of their own”

The same happens in cuckqueen fantasies where the other female mocks the partner for not being able to keep a “real” man.

“Not to mention that the way these “alphas” mock men who are being cuckolded”

You’ll never come across a dominant, muscular male that wants to see his partner fucked by another man. The men that are usually into this are very demure, and easily trampled over. It isn’t that uncommon to come across cuckholds that will want to lick the cum off of the bull (the one doing the fucking).

The reason they are being mocked is because they are bitches. It is more a reflection on them than it is on the woman. So, I don’t know why you’re trying to spin this into a tale of misogyny when it really isn’t. Women are free to choose who they want, and if the man is a bitch, she’ll probably look elsewhere for sexual gratification, like a bull.

No man can respect another man that cannot keep his partner satisfied, as that often leads to the partner looking elsewhere. Men who cuckhold for that reason are considered bitches, because they are.

You said it yourself, “not everyone shares it”. The vast majority of people want monogamous relationships. So when men from such categories look at these bitch boys who need other men to please their partners, we mock them. Hell, we have cuckholds that openly admit they are the bull’s bitches. Can anyone respect someone who feels about themselves and their partner like that? I certainly can’t.

I don’t care that people have that fetish, but I cannot respect a man who is into that sort of thing. It reflects poorly on him, because he wants another man to please his wife because he cannot please her himself.

Oh, how wonderfully stupid! Telling us something isn’t a “tale of misogyny” and liberally using a sexualized slur for a woman to denigrate men! Because being compared to a woman in any way is the worst possible thing, amirite?

I’m not a guy, but people have asked extremely explicit questions about my sexual preferences. I don’t know why I’ve run into so many people who ask the most invasive questions ever about everything from masturbation habits to racist shit like “Would you prefer to fuck a Latina or an Arab?” As if I’m some racist white cis het dudebro who totes thinks that some races are more attractive than others. I really hope it doesn’t happen again soon. The last time it happened to me was when I met my sister’s boyfriend again, who actually told me to have sex “as a guy” before transitioning. Fucking people these days… X_X

So um, I can’t imagine a huge number of people being receptive to such questions. MRAs live in another dimension, as usual.

There’s something hilarious about dudebro banging on about how he just can’t respect other people’s fetishes while TMI-ing away about his own fetish. I mean really, “bulls”? Your kink is not my kink, sweetie. Livestock just doesn’t do it for me, you know?

You’ll never come across a dominant, muscular male that wants to see his partner fucked by another man. The men that are usually into this are very demure, and easily trampled over. It isn’t that uncommon to come across cuckholds that will want to lick the cum off of the bull (the one doing the fucking).

The reason they are being mocked is because they are bitches. It is more a reflection on them than it is on the woman. So, I don’t know why you’re trying to spin this into a tale of misogyny when it really isn’t. Women are free to choose who they want, and if the man is a bitch, she’ll probably look elsewhere for sexual gratification, like a bull.

No man can respect another man that cannot keep his partner satisfied, as that often leads to the partner looking elsewhere. Men who cuckhold for that reason are considered bitches, because they are.

You said it yourself, “not everyone shares it”. The vast majority of people want monogamous relationships. So when men from such categories look at these bitch boys who need other men to please their partners, we mock them. Hell, we have cuckholds that openly admit they are the bull’s bitches. Can anyone respect someone who feels about themselves and their partner like that? I certainly can’t.

I don’t care that people have that fetish, but I cannot respect a man who is into that sort of thing. It reflects poorly on him, because he wants another man to please his wife because he cannot please her himself.

You want to know something odd about people who are way into ideals of behavior, taco limey? It starts to kind of poison their general ability to apply analogies to situations.

What I mean is this: You see “Dominant, muscular man” and you think “Can never do XX”, because “XX is not dominant”. It’s a kind of logic, and it kind of makes sense, but it’s also wrong. But it’s the sort of thing that happens all the time. The assumption of a physical basis for perceived personality “flaws” or traits.

That’s why anyone who disagrees with Heartiste is a “leftoid”, or a fat something something, or a slobbering something something. That’s why your example of a cuckhold is a frail, demure person. It’s a mental block in your head that replaces personality with physicality, and uses the latter for a proxy of the former.

So no man can respect another man who cannot satisfy his woman, because that other man must be weak and demure and frail and not dominant, and so he must be incapable of satisfying a woman, who can only be satisfied by big, hulky, hunky men with massive thews. So obviously these weak, lower men are the underlings and slaves of that big, strong man with his dominant muscles.

I don’t wanna be an asshole, but is it fun to have a metal view of the world like an oversize caricature cartoon? Is it satisfying to walk around looking at the world through that perspective? I just can’t imagine that it would be. You’d make so many fundamental attribution errors, for one thing. Whenever someone in the gym moved up on their bench press, you’d have to re-organize an entire social hierarchy because that guy is now the buffer man. If someone’s sick for a week and loses 10 pounds, they end up lower on the scale. If you wear glasses, you must be a smart nerd.

Tired of creepy guys asking invasive questions about your sex life? Do you wish that they would just shut up immediately and become completely discouraged from ever interacting with you frequently? Then perhaps the Misandry Horn is the solution you’re looking for. It’s a state-of-the-art air horn used to make creepy guys shut up instantly due to shock. Here is an example of a woman attempting to ward off a PUA:

Bestiality Taco doesn’t seem to fathom that not all men give a shit about what weird dudebros think of them. He also seems to think that “muscular dominant male” is automatically A Great Desirable Thing. Nope, not for everyone, it isn’t. I find the image repellent.