"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:
>seebs@plethora.net writes:
>> What surprises me is that, if I don't do a 'make depend', those files
>> don't seem to get built. That's confusing, IMHO.
>That is a bug, but OTOH, if your dependencies are wrong, nothing is
>guaranteed to work right.
If you just created a virgin source tree, filled it with fresh source,
then plain old "make" should build everything without needing a
"make depend". Is that the case Peter's talking about?