Welcome

Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and
others concerned about HIV/AIDS. Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the
conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning: Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive
and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a
username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own
physician.

All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators
of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please
provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are
true and correct to their knowledge.

We’d like to share the views of people living with and affected by HIV about criminal laws in a situation where a person living with HIV is accused of not disclosing her or his HIV status or of HIV exposure or transmission.

This survey is intended for:

People living with HIV/AIDS

Partners, spouses, and other family members and friends of people with HIV/AIDS

Community members affected by HIV/AIDS

Advocates and others who work in the field of HIV/AIDS

Your answers will help determine the information and advocacy needs regarding this important issue.

We will not share any identifying information about you or any other survey participant to anyone.

Seroconverted: Early 80sTested & confirmed what I already knew: early 90s

Current regimen: Atripla. Last regimen: Epzicom, Sustiva (since its inception with NO adverse side effects: no vivid dreams and NONE of the problems people who can't tolerate this drug may experience: color me lucky )Past regimensFun stuff (in the past): HAV/HBV, crypto, shingles, AIDS, PCP

Um, I love to fill out surveys, but who is "we" and who will the collected data be shared with?

I'd just like to know before I share my IP address and possibly personally identifying information with whomever it is that's collecting this data.

I'm not saying this to be obnoxious, just looking for more info.

Thanks,Osric

Taken directly from the site, after clicking through the age disclaimer page:

Project Title: National survey on attitudes of people infected and affected by HIV toward criminalization of HIV non-disclosure, exposure, and transmission.

Investigator: Laurel Sprague, Eastern Michigan University

Purpose: This survey is a research study designed to learn the opinions of people infected and affected by HIV about the use of criminal laws in a situation where a person living with HIV is accused of not disclosing her or his HIV status.

Duration: This survey will take approximately 20 minutes to complete.

Procedure: You will be asked to complete a questionnaire about your demographic information and your opinions and experiences related to HIV criminalization. Please note that the survey will ask your opinions about some very sensitive topics regarding sexual practices and your own HIV status. All responses are anonymous. You can skip any question that you prefer not to answer and you can exit the survey at any time.

Confidentiality: No identifying information will be collected. Your answers will be anonymous. Only a code number will identify your questionnaire responses. At no time will your name be associated with your responses to the questionnaires. All electronic data will be stored on a password-protected computer.

Expected Risks: There are no foreseeable risks to you by completing this survey as all results will be kept completely confidential. Please note that the survey includes questions about your opinions regarding HIV disclosure in a variety of situations, including different kinds of sexual or intimate encounters. You can skip any question that you prefer not to answer.

Expected Benefits: There will be no direct personal benefit to you, but your participation will contribute to our understanding of the opinions, experiences, and concerns of communities affected by HIV about the use of criminal laws to regulate the disclosure of someone’s HIV status.

Voluntary Participation: Participation in this study is voluntary. You may choose not to participate. If you do decide to participate, you can change your mind at any time and withdraw from the study without negative consequences.

Use of Research Results: Results will be presented in aggregate form only. No names or individually identifying information will be revealed. Results may be presented at research meetings and conferences and in scientific publications. A report of the results will be provided on-line at no cost. For a copy of the survey results, visit www.seroproject.com. Preliminary results will be posted in July 2012 with comprehensive results posted by December 2012.

Future Questions: If you have any questions concerning your participation in this study now or in the future, you can contact the principal investigator, Laurel Sprague, at 734.657.2569 or via e-mail at lspragu2@emich.edu.

This research protocol and informed consent document has been reviewed and approved by the Eastern Michigan University Human Subjects Review Committee for use from June 14, 2012, to June 14, 2015. If you have questions about the approval process, please contact the Director of the Graduate School (734.487.0042, human.subjects@emich.edu).___________________________________________________________Edited to add:

SERO is fighting HIV-related stigma, discrimination and criminalization, but to do so effectively, we need to understand a wide variety of perspectives on this issue. We don’t see this as one – having “sides” – meaning one is “for or against” criminalization, but one that is complex and will require the meaningful participation of people with HIV and key affected communities to find the best solutions.

Preliminary results from the survey will be posted here in late July 2012. The full results will be posted by the end of 2012.

Seroconverted: Early 80sTested & confirmed what I already knew: early 90s

Current regimen: Atripla. Last regimen: Epzicom, Sustiva (since its inception with NO adverse side effects: no vivid dreams and NONE of the problems people who can't tolerate this drug may experience: color me lucky )Past regimensFun stuff (in the past): HAV/HBV, crypto, shingles, AIDS, PCP

"I have tried hard--but life is difficult, and I am a very useless person. I can hardly be said to have an independent existence. I was just a screw or a cog in the great machine I called life, and when I dropped out of it I found I was of no use anywhere else."

"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Thanks Solo, survey completed. Like Ann, I found a couple of the questions very strange, especially ones talking about disclosing your status when using a condom or a GLOVE? A glove, really? I also found the inclusion of survival sex to be very interesting and I will be curious to see the results surrounding that issue.

Thanks Solo, survey completed. Like Ann, I found a couple of the questions very strange, especially ones talking about disclosing your status when using a condom or a GLOVE? A glove, really? I also found the inclusion of survival sex to be very interesting and I will be curious to see the results surrounding that issue.

Joe

"Glove" is slang for condom in some locales. I don't think they were referring to the gloves on hands -- e.g. those often used for fisting. We can start another thread on the risks of HIV transmission from fisting.

I completed the survey. Unfortunately, I suspect the results will favor criminalization, depending on the population of the survey-takers.

Henry

Logged

"Life in Lubbock, Texas, taught me two things: One is that God loves you and you're going to burn in hell. The other is that sex is the most awful, filthy thing on earth and you should save it for someone you love." - Butch Hancock, Musician, The Flatlanders

Thanks to all who participated by taking the survey. I took it as I was posting this thread, and like everyone has mentioned so far, I also found many of the questions to be quite strange. I couldn't imagine someone who lives in a rural setting ever thinking about having to use a glove during fisting

And like Henry, I concur that many of the people who take it will favor criminalization, as it seems that some of the questions are skewed (although unintentionally) to generate negative thoughts.

Maybe the question writers didn't take that into consideration when putting it together? Also since Sean Strub's organization is affiliated with it, no doubt Sean realizes that there are people out there who don't think there's anything wrong with locking up pozzies and throwing away the key.

PS: I watched We Were Here last night on PBS and was reminded of just how bad life used to be if one was poz when they spoke about defeating that Proposition in California twice which wanted to quarantine people with hiv.

Seroconverted: Early 80sTested & confirmed what I already knew: early 90s

Current regimen: Atripla. Last regimen: Epzicom, Sustiva (since its inception with NO adverse side effects: no vivid dreams and NONE of the problems people who can't tolerate this drug may experience: color me lucky )Past regimensFun stuff (in the past): HAV/HBV, crypto, shingles, AIDS, PCP

Took the survey and actually discovered I was amused. As one of the few here who leans towards the right, I found these questions ridiculous and it brought back memories of the ignorance surrounding this virus in the early days.

Well, I believe in full-disclosure of my HIV+ status, I always have ( if I'm gonna do the deed or glove up or not) and I thought it was poorly worded, but never-the-less, I took the survey, I hope it helps, but I kinda doubt it tho....

Logged

"it's so nice to be insane, cause no-one ask you to explain" Helen Reddy cc 1974

Took the survey. It did make me question how I come to my opinions of this issue, when I answer yes in one situation, but no in another. The question about whether someone who says they intend to infect someone and carries out risky behavior to do so, had me questioning myself all over again.

Took the survey. It did make me question how I come to my opinions of this issue, when I answer yes in one situation, but no in another. The question about whether someone who says they intend to infect someone and carries out risky behavior to do so, had me questioning myself all over again.

Curious as to how often this has happened to you?

Logged

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

Well I always hear about people who threaten to, or brag about infecting a lot of people. I have been positive since 1993 and I've never had a friend or acquaintance ever mention doing, or think about doing such a thing. I've read anecdotal reports online, you know, friends who have friends and such. And of course there are the bugchaser sites and all.

I've just never experienced it myself, and was wondering if that's a thing I've simply been lucky enough (or picky enough in choice of friends, or agoraphobic enough) to miss.

I wonder if it isn't much like a Dirty Sanchez or a donkey punch. You can all look it up and see what it means, but I will be damned if I can find real life people who have experienced it. Not saying that no one has, of course, or even that only one or two people have. Just... I am not convinced it's a thing in the vast majority of society.

Maybe drug and alcohol abuse plays a role in that sort of thinking? That sort of weird societal vengeance? I dunno.

Logged

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

Well I always hear about people who threaten to, or brag about infecting a lot of people. I have been positive since 1993 and I've never had a friend or acquaintance ever mention doing, or think about doing such a thing. I've read anecdotal reports online, you know, friends who have friends and such. And of course there are the bugchaser sites and all.

I've just never experienced it myself, and was wondering if that's a thing I've simply been lucky enough (or picky enough in choice of friends, or agoraphobic enough) to miss.

I wonder if it isn't much like a Dirty Sanchez or a donkey punch. You can all look it up and see what it means, but I will be damned if I can find real life people who have experienced it. Not saying that no one has, of course, or even that only one or two people have. Just... I am not convinced it's a thing in the vast majority of society.

Maybe drug and alcohol abuse plays a role in that sort of thinking? That sort of weird societal vengeance? I dunno.

I've never heard, personally, anyone say they wanted to, were going to, or did that. I've heard the stories, rumors, and I'm sure just totally made up shit, so the person has something to gossip about. I know there are sociopaths out there, but I can't imagine it happens that often.

Survival sex is a form of prostitution, usually done to get food, a place to stay the night, and most homeless teens will fall prey to this in a urban large City setting...

Survival sex can also refer to a situation where a person (usually a woman) is in an abusive or unfaithful relationship that they would like to get out of, if only they had the financial means.

They continue to have sex with the abusive/unfaithful partner to avoid being left or kicked out without means of supporting themselves. This can happen in any relationship where there is financial dependency, but is more common in women with small children.

They know or suspect their partner is not being faithful, but they cannot request condom usage for fear of violence and they cannot refuse sex for fear of abandonment and destitution. Particularly when children are involved, many women will put up with the situation - and the sex - to survive.

"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Survival sex can also refer to a situation where Gay men are in a abusive or unfaithful relationship with another man that they would like to get out of, if only they had the financial means. this happens acrossthe board, it's not limited to just woman......just saying

Logged

"it's so nice to be insane, cause no-one ask you to explain" Helen Reddy cc 1974

Survival sex can also refer to a situation where Gay men are in a abusive or unfaithful relationship with another man that they would like to get out of, if only they had the financial means. this happens acrossthe board, it's not limited to just woman......just saying

Survival sex can also refer to a situation where a person (usually a woman) is in an abusive or unfaithful relationship that they would like to get out of, if only they had the financial means.

They continue to have sex with the abusive/unfaithful partner to avoid being left or kicked out without means of supporting themselves. This can happen in any relationship where there is financial dependency, but is more common in women with small children.

They know or suspect their partner is not being faithful, but they cannot request condom usage for fear of violence and they cannot refuse sex for fear of abandonment and destitution. Particularly when children are involved, many women will put up with the situation - and the sex - to survive.

A person can mean anyone, men, women, gay, straight or any other description - and I did say any relationship which again can mean any combination of men, women, gay, straight or whatever.

However, it is a more common occurrence for women - particularly women with children - but I never said it was a phenomenon limited to women.

"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

One of the authors of this study got in touch with us to ask if we could help them to get more women taking part in the study. Here's what she wrote:

Dear all,

For those who don't know me, my name is Laurel Sprague and I am the Regional Coordinator for the North American affiliate of The Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+NA). I am writing to ask for your help in recruiting women to participate in an on-line survey about HIV and the use of the criminal law. This is the largest and most comprehe nsive survey of its kind ever done in the United States and it is truly a grassroots effort. Sean Strub and I (with The Sero Project) have worked closely to create and implement the survey and we received a tremendous amount of community input, largely from other people living with HIV, into the questions that are asked in the survey.

I am really pleased about the number of people who have completed the survey so far (over 2500). However, only 18% of respondents have identified themselves as women. Because women's experiences of HIV and the criminal law may be quite different from men's, it is tremendously important to me to do everything I can to make sure that enough women's voices are included. If enough women respond, I will be able to break the survey results down by gender to see if there are meaningful differences (and it looks already like there will be differences).

Would you consider taking the survey and/or forwarding it to any groups or people in your address book who might be interested in adding their experiences and opinions to this survey? We want as many people as possible from all groups to be involved, but are particularly looking for women respondents.

The survey has been designed primarily for respondents in the U.S.(or from the U.S. living outside the country) who are people living with or otherwise affected by HIV - including key populations, family members, people who work in the field, affected communities, and people who just simply care. If you are not from the U.S., you are still welcome to fill out the survey. There is a place where you can indicate your country.

"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

I've never heard, personally, anyone say they wanted to, were going to, or did that. I've heard the stories, rumors, and I'm sure just totally made up shit, so the person has something to gossip about. I know there are sociopaths out there, but I can't imagine it happens that often.

To be honest, an occasional hook-up of mine said he knows a guy who has HIV and claims to have bareback sex all around around and not tell guys of his status...and he does this on purpose.

Kind of like "Well if I'm going down I'll take all of you with me". Pretty scary thought indeed and the reason why there are some pretty harsh laws regarding this in some countries.

"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Gossips like this perpetuates the "shame and stigma" , you mentioned earlier in another thread.

This.

Explain, Rockin, how emphasizing HIv as "no big deal" eliminates stigma, when it seems apparent that this guy (whose existence AND claims remain unproven) is following precisely that tact.

Certainly you think HIV is on some level a "big deal" if indeed the claimed actions of this gentleman can provide such salacious fruit.

Logged

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

Explain, Rockin, how emphasizing HIv as "no big deal" eliminates stigma, when it seems apparent that this guy (whose existence AND claims remain unproven) is following precisely that tact.

Certainly you think HIV is on some level a "big deal" if indeed the claimed actions of this gentleman can provide such salacious fruit.

Yeah forget it. I dont even know the guy, its just a rumour...I just meant to say that all it takes is one psycopath for people to run and get their torches and pitchforks. I understand why these laws were created...most of them are poorly written though.

Yeah forget it. I dont even know the guy, its just a rumour...I just meant to say that all it takes is one psycopath for people to run and get their torches and pitchforks. I understand why these laws were created...most of them are poorly written though.

You might want to read the threads on HIV and persecution under these laws, because most of us don't understand why HIV has been singled out for criminal prosecution. You really need to read these laws, so you can grasp their full impact, before you agree or claim to understand why they were created.

You might want to read the threads on HIV and persecution under these laws, because most of us don't understand why HIV has been singled out for criminal prosecution. You really need to read these laws, so you can grasp their full impact, before you agree or claim to understand why they were created.

Joe

Even If I read them kill, and disagree with them, they're not going away are they? As long as there are nuts out there will be laws like this. And HIV has been singled out because well...is there any other STD as deadly as this? If cancer was contagious you can bet there would also be laws about it.

Even If I read them kill, and disagree with them, they're not going away are they? As long as there are nuts out there will be laws like this. And HIV has been singled out because well...is there any other STD as deadly as this? If cancer was contagious you can bet there would also be laws about it.

Well -- if you DID read those threads, you'd have your answer.

Where are the laws for influenza? Thousands die each year, yet no one gets prosecuted. They could have stayed home and kept that VIRUS to themselves, but they didn't. It is NO different than HIV -- except for the fact that it is far easier to catch the flu virus.

Oh....... cancer CAN be contagious -- ever hear of HPV? It is a cause of cervical and anal cancer -- and perhaps others too. Now you must try another argument.

It must be me, but when I see an injustice, or a law with which I vehemently disagree and find personally harmful. I tend to speak out about it and take what action I can to see it overturned.

So yes, to the degree that any/all of us can do something about it, I suggest that these laws ARE going to go away.

Logged

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Where are the laws for influenza? Thousands die each year, yet no one gets prosecuted. They could have stayed home and kept that VIRUS to themselves, but they didn't. It is NO different than HIV -- except for the fact that it is far easier to catch the flu virus.

Oh....... cancer CAN be contagious -- ever hear of HPV? It is a cause of cervical and anal cancer -- and perhaps others too. Now you must try another argument.

Mike

Oh bocker cmon...how many people die from HPV, compared to HIV? And there is also a vaccine now, its a very different beast. I dated two guys who had anal HPV, they burned the warts, took some meds and are fine now.

The UK law regarding HIV infection is very well written, as opposed to the one from Florida, from my understading. In the UK you cant be considered a criminal if you used protection. In Florida it doesn't matter. Right guys, or am I talking crazy?

And people still feel scared shitless of HIV. I personally blame some doctors for using their "scare tactics" about it.

So yeah, I understand the need for these laws, unfortunate as it may be.

Laws that are "fear based" generally make for bad public policy. In the U.S. HIV disclosure laws, some states have taken a more common sense approach whereas others have created horrible laws based largely on fear and ignorance.

Logged

Diagnosed in May of 2010 with teh AIDS.

PCP Pneumonia . CD4 8 . VL 500,000

TRIUMEQ - VALTREX - FLUOXETINE - FENOFIBRATE - PRAVASTATIN - CIALIS

Numbers consistent since 12/2010 - VL has remained undetectable and CD4 is anywhere from 275-325

actually, I don't believe I've ever heard of a case of a "nut", a "typhoid mary" sort of person, spreading HIV on purpose. Do you have a link to a real case*, or is this just conjecture on your part? There are so many myths - and stigma - surrounding HIV that just aren't true. (*there really needs to be way more than 1 case anyway to make this a problem of statistical importance to be worthy of worrying about or crafting laws to help prevent.)

Sadly, the people who are actually spreading HIV are the approx 20% who have never even been tested and don't even know they are positive. If those people don't get tested because of fear of these disclosure laws then these laws are actually counterproductive to solving the problem they claim to be designed to combat. Surely there's no "need" for laws that are actually making the HIV infection rate problem worse.

Oh bocker cmon...how many people die from HPV, compared to HIV? And there is also a vaccine now, its a very different beast. I dated two guys who had anal HPV, they burned the warts, took some meds and are fine now.

So yeah, I understand the need for these laws, unfortunate as it may be.

It isn't different -- they are BOTH VIRUSes -- (I notice you ignored the influenza piece).And remember these laws don't require death -- hell, they don't even require transmission to occur. Just the fact that you have this virus is enough to prosecute you. There are plenty of viruses that cause disease and death that are far easier to pass on than HIV is, yet not a one of them has laws criminalizing them.

So you may have an opinion that say these laws are needed -- you are entitled to that, even if I disagree.

However, if you say you "understand the need" then you are speaking from a place of ignorance, not understanding. If these laws are needed, then so is a law that allows me to jail the dumb asses who come to work with the flu (thousands of folks die of influenza in the USA in a typical year). With HIV -- I chose to bareback with someone -- it was MY CHOICE -- IT WAS MY FAULT. When someone gets the flu, it is because someone else made a choice to go out in public. MY CHOICE should not lead to jail time for someone else.

Mike

P.S. -- according to the CDC - over 4,000 women die in the US each year due to cervical cancer -- that is how one group of people who "die from HPV".

Even If I read them kill, and disagree with them, they're not going away are they? As long as there are nuts out there will be laws like this. And HIV has been singled out because well...is there any other STD as deadly as this? If cancer was contagious you can bet there would also be laws about it.

It's not the lethality of HIV that is the issue, it's that it is a virus, such as the others mentioned, which are much easier to contract, yet there are no laws against their transmission. It seems you may think in black and white and cannot grasp the idea of making criminals out of two consenting adults. The question is not why are their laws against HIV transmission. The question is why are there laws against transmission of HIV only?

You still have a lot to learn and if you want to be taken seriously, you need to present a sound argument and not just parrot talking points. These are complicated issues and your dismissing others views does nothing to make your case.

It's not the lethality of HIV that is the issue, it's that it is a virus, such as the others mentioned, which are much easier to contract, yet there are no laws against their transmission. It seems you may think in black and white and cannot grasp the idea of making criminals out of two consenting adults. The question is not why are their laws against HIV transmission. The question is why are there laws against transmission of HIV only?

You still have a lot to learn and if you want to be taken seriously, you need to present a sound argument and not just parrot talking points. These are complicated issues and your dismissing others views does nothing to make your case.

Joe

Well said Joe!

Logged

Diagnosed in May of 2010 with teh AIDS.

PCP Pneumonia . CD4 8 . VL 500,000

TRIUMEQ - VALTREX - FLUOXETINE - FENOFIBRATE - PRAVASTATIN - CIALIS

Numbers consistent since 12/2010 - VL has remained undetectable and CD4 is anywhere from 275-325

"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts