Cross-party MPs back League’s demand for five year sentences for animal abusers and national register

Government’s initial rejection to increasing sentencing deemed a cop out

Five year prison sentences for animal cruelty, including dog fighting, and a national register of animal abusers were demanded by cross-MPs today during a passionate Parliamentary debate backing calls made by the League Against Cruel Sports.

Increasing pressure to raise the maximum penalty for animal welfare offences from six months to five years in prison has been growing, both among MPs and the public amid demands from animal welfare groups including the League, campaigning to stamp out dog fighting.

The League is determined to uncover and help prevent dog fighting in the UK, which has led the charity to call for tougher punishments so that the law acts as both a deterrent and reflects the horrific nature of dog fighting as a crime. These calls have won the support of a whole list of high profile figures including legendary explorer Sir Ranulph Fiennes, Downton Abbey star and League Vice President, Peter Egan, comedian Ricky Gervais and TOWIE star Chloe Meadows

League Against Cruel Sports CEO, Eduardo Gonçalves said:

“I am grateful to Neil Parish MP for securing today’s important debate. It was great to see MPs mirror public fury and frustration on this subject – but now we need the Government to pick this issue up and give animals the justice they deserve.”

“With a maximum sentence of just six months in prison, England and Wales are lagging embarrassingly behind when it comes to punishing those who abuse animals. If the law is going to serve any purpose of acting as a deterrent, the time must fit the severity of the crime.”

Explorer Sir Ranulph Fiennes in support of the League’s campaign to end dog fighting in the UK and call for tougher sentencing said:

“Last month MPs did not even get the opportunity to debate legislation to increase sentencing, let alone vote. To say I was annoyed would be an understatement. There is much talk of discontent with parliament, and I certainly shared a feeling of outrage when I witnessed this legislation blocked by MPs playing pathetic Parliamentary games.

“Dog fighting is one of the most heinous forms of animal cruelty. Treated no differently than disposable commodities, dogs are bred, sold and forced to fight for financial gain or to provide what can only be described as vile entertainment.

“If the current law is to ever serve as a real deterrent to dog fighters or other perpetrators of animal cruelty, the current maximum six month custodial sentence must be increased.

“I have seen first-hand how committed many MPs are to ensuring animals across Britain are protected. There is enough good will in all parties to make this happen.

“Animals are suffering and the perpetrators are getting away with a slap on the wrist. It is time the Government get on with it and bring England and Wales into the 21st century.”

In addition to toughening up sentencing, the League would like to see one of the most heinous acts of animal abuse, dog fighting made a recordable offence and the implementation of a national database of individuals banned from owning animals to prevent further animals failing victim

The recommendation was however rejected by Government at the time, claiming average sentences for animal cruelty were relatively stable. Today’s debate was called to highlight why the issue needs revisiting.

EFRA Committee Chairman Neil Parish told fellow MPs:

“Sentencing guidelines are neither a strict enough punishment nor a suitable deterrent for animal abusers…If you kick an animal senseless, strangle it, torture it, burn it to death or flay it alive, what’s the maximum prison sentence you can get in England? Six months.

“I was surprised and disappointed that the Government rejected the recommendation for a higher maximum sentence of five years and I would again ask the Minister to go back to Government, the Home Office and the Justice Department to see if we can get this increase.”

Mr Parish then went onto criticise the Government’s response to the EFRA Committee’s recommendation as being a ‘cop out’.

Also speaking at today’s debate, Rebecca Pow MP and Co-chair of APGAW raised the links between human and animal violence. She said:

“There are stark statistics to prove abuse to humans often takes place after humans have abused animals, or even at the same time.”

A number of MPs including Robert Goodwill and Craig Williams also spoke of their support for a national register of convicted animal abusers.

Sue Hayman, Labour’s DEFRA Shadow mentioned her support of the League’s dog fighting campaign and Labour’s support for the creation of a register of banned owners.

Today’s debate comes after two pieces of legislation due to be debated in the Commons last month; Animal fighting Bill (sentencing) and Animal Cruelty Bill (sentencing) were stopped from progressing after an objection to both Bills came from the backbenches.

Victim of dog fighting

Recently, through the League’s investigation into dog fighting in the UK, the League were introduced to Staffordshire Bull Terrier Poppet.

Poppet was originally found hiding under a hedge near to a busy main road, after it is thought she had been thrown from a car. She came into her rescuer and now forever home, very thin, hopping on three legs and covered in multiple dog bite scars on her face, neck, head shoulders, legs and rib cage believed to be consistent with dog fighting. Thought to be no older than three years old, upon further veterinary examination was discovered to have had her leg broken two years prior and unbelievably in that condition she had also been repeatedly bred from, resulting in the crumbling of her broken bones.

Under current sentencing Poppet’s abusers if convicted, would only face a maximum six months in prison.

The full case study of Staffordshire Bull Terrier Poppet is available on request including images.

Sentencing remains unchanged since the introduction of the Protection of Animals Act in 1911, leaving England and Wales lagging behind most other European countries which have a maximum custodial sentence standing between two and five years.

The League Against Cruel Sports is Britain's leading charity that works to stop animals being persecuted, abused and killed for sport. The League was instrumental in helping bring about the landmark Hunting Act. We carry out investigations to expose law-breaking and cruelty to animals and campaign for stronger animal protection laws and penalties. We work to change attitudes and behaviour through education and manage sanctuaries to protect wildlife. Find out more about our work at www.league.org.uk

League Against Cruel Sports is a registered charity in England and Wales (1095234) and Scotland (SC045533).

Latest

Positive measures to protect animals have been announced by the government today. The Animal Welfare Bill 2018 includes an increase in sentencing for animal abuse from a maximum of six months jail to five years, and also states that animal sentience must be recognised in any future laws.

Related

Positive measures to protect animals have been announced by the government today. The Animal Welfare Bill 2018 includes an increase in sentencing for animal abuse from a maximum of six months jail to five years, and also states that animal sentience must be recognised in any future laws.

This blog post corrects many errors published in a December 2017 Metro’s article about fox hunting, in which it confuses trail hunting, drag hunting and clean boot hunting. The post sets the record straight regarding recent incidents of hunt violence and intimidation, and rebukes some of the mistruths perpetuated by the pro-hunt lobby.

Wildlife crime, including the chasing and killing of animals using loopholes in the law, came under the microscope when the League Against Cruel Sports joined forces with the police at a prestigious conference this weekend.

A county council in West Sussex has banned new tenants from using cruel and indiscriminate snares to capture live animals on its land. The ban came into force this summer and is attracting interest from other councils across the UK.

Most read

As a team, we share the same passion – to stop animal cruelty in the name of sport. We are a tight knit team and we work hard within a fun, relaxed environment. We also offer something many employers don’t – an office full of friendly dogs!

Hunting was banned in England and Wales in 2004, but the law has never been properly enforced, and attempts to weaken or repeal it continue. The hunting law in Scotland is weak, and hunting is still legal in Northern Ireland.

Hurting and killing animals for ‘sport’ is one of the principal causes of animal cruelty in the UK: tens of millions suffer and die each year for ‘leisure’ activities. We’re here to protect those animals.

Bullfighting is perhaps the most well known spectator “sport” involving the killing of animals for entertainment. It has already been banned in most countries, but each year tens of thousands of bulls are maimed, tortured and killed for entertainment in Spain, Portugal, France, Colombia, Mexico, USA, Venezuela, Ecuador and Peru.

The hidden side of greyhound racing includes dogs kept for long periods in lonely kennels, painful injuries from racing and training, illness and neglect. Shockingly, thousands of surplus dogs die or disappear every year. The League believes dogs should not suffer or die for entertainment or for the profit of the dog racing industry.

The Hunting Act 2004 is the law which bans chasing wild mammals with dogs in England and Wales – this basically means that fox hunting, deer hunting, hare hunting, hare coursing and mink hunting are all illegal, as they all are cruel sports based on dogs chasing wild mammals.