Moreover, Texas already allows 18-20 y.o.’s to carry concealed – legally. They just have to be in the military (Reg., reserves, or Guard) or have been honorably discharged.

I wonder what the Bradys think of that?

Also, if you look at their list of references cited, you get the so-called research coming from David Hemenway, Jens Ludwig, Philip Cook, and the Violence Policy Center.

Interesting that this is the only post-McDonald case in which the Brady’s have sought to file an amicus brief. Given the Judge in the case, they should have thought twice about it. However, their need to try and stick to the NRA overcame their judgment (or whatever judgment they might have).

I’m covering ground that is always mentioned when this subject comes up, but the fact is they are allowed to drive, allowed to vote, and large numbers of people that age carry assault rifles and risk their butts on our behalf overseas. If they are old enough for all that, then they are old enough for anything else a citizen can legally do.