Dear Stella,
> > Although Luis Polo in nominally in the WG, I'd suggest replying to his
> > post on the comments list, thanking him for the report, letting him know
> > it's been fixed, and asking if it works okay for him now.
>
> Ok, I'll do that.
that won't be necessary. I acknowledge that the problem is now fixed. I
have posted in the public mailing list, as per the instructions for
submitting these comments. If you prefer, I will do it here next time.
Thank you very much!
Best,
p.
PS: we have only checked imports for RIF-Core tests. We can not tell
whether PRD and BLD tests have the same problems.
> Stella
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> >> These problems (import locations and missing rdf prefixes) are fixed
> >> in repository version 1.05.
> >
> > Excellent. (You mean you just fixed it, right? Your phrasing allows
> > the possibility that it was fixed a while ago, since I don't know when
> > 1.05 was released.)
> >
> >> Stella
> >>
> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-comments/2009Nov/0008.html
> >
> > Although Luis Polo in nominally in the WG, I'd suggest replying to his
> > post on the comments list, thanking him for the report, letting him know
> > it's been fixed, and asking if it works okay for him now.
> >
> > -- Sandro
> >
> >
>