Every Republican Presidential Candidate Is Hitler

“Except for Adolf Hitler's extermination of the
Jewish people, the American bombardment of defenseless peasants in Indochina is
the most barbaric act of modern times.”

That quote didn’t come from some Soviet hack coughing up
copy for Moscow, but from Democratic presidential candidate George McGovern.
(Some years later, McGovern would compare the Communist massacres in Cambodia
to the Holocaust and call for some of that barbaric military intervention.)

Vice President Hubert Humphrey also brought out Hitler
when running against Nixon, declaring, “If the British had not fought in 1940,
Hitler would have been in London and if Democrats do not fight in 1968, Nixon
will be in the White House.” Chicago Mayor Daley had accused Nixon of
“Hitler type” tactics.

McGovern had set a record for comparing Nixon to Hitler,
which made him very popular with the left, but he hadn’t originated it.
Comparing any Republican presidential candidate to Hitler had been a standard
Democratic political tactic for some time no matter how inappropriate it might
be.

Before McGovern was comparing Nixon to Hitler, he was
comparing Barry Goldwater to Hitler. Goldwater had a Jewish father and a
distaste for Socialism, which would have made him unwelcome in the ranks of the
racially and politically pure National Socialists, but that didn’t stop the
Hitler accusations from being hurled by the Democratic party and its political
allies in the press.

Governor Pat Brown of California said, “Goldwater's
acceptance speech had the stench of fascism. All we needed to hear was Heil
Hitler.” Mayor Jack Shelley of San Francisco claimed that Goldwater strategists
got all their ideas from Mein Kampf.

Even though Goldwater had been an early NAACP member,
NAACP leader Roy Wilkins warned,
"Those who say that the doctrine of ultra-conservatism offers no menace
should remember that a man come out of the beer halls of Munich and rallied the
forces of rightism in Germany. All the same elements are there in San Francisco
now."

The NAACP accused Goldwater of appealing to “fear and
bigotry”. Martin Luther King said, “We see danger signs of Hitlerism in the
candidacy of Mr. Goldwater.”

Union leaders launched a national campaign to denounce
Goldwater as Hitler II. "I have drawn a parallel between Goldwater and
Hitler and I make no apology for drawing that parallel," George Meany of
the AFL-CIO declared. While Goldwater wasn’t Hitler, the CIO part of the
AFL-CIO had strong Communist influences and after the Hitler-Stalin pact, some
unions within it staged strikes to sabotage production and prevent aid from
reaching the Allies who were fighting Hitler. Not only was Goldwater not
Hitler, but some of the organizations represented by Meany had aided Hitler
when Stalin told them to.

[Editorial Note: "Nazi" is a German acronym for National German Socialist Workers' Party]Accusing Republicans of being Hitler for assorted petty
reasons dates back to the time when Hitler was still around. FDR accused
Republican candidate Wendell Willkie of using “Hitler tactics” by repeating his
slogans frequently. But it was the frequent associations of Republicans and
Hitler by Democrats that was the true Big Lie. Its only purpose was a
senseless association through the repetition of ridiculous and baseless
accusations that every single Republican was just Hitler in a better suit.

Typical of this tactic was Senator Tom Lantos ranting,
“If you overlook your involvement in the KKK, or the Nazi party, or the
Republican Party, you are lying.” The issue at hand had nothing to do with
Nazism. It was about Clinton’s Secretary of Agriculture taking bribes.
The goal was to associate Republicans with Nazism by classing the two together
as frequently as possible regardless of relevance, decency or truth.

In the Iran-Contra trial, Oliver North was accused of
“following Adolf Hitler’s official strategy”. What did one have to do with the
other? Nothing. But this sort of lazy accusation had become typical and
routine. William Shirer, who had also compared Nixon’s bombing of Hanoi to the
Holocaust and called Nixon an “apt pupil” of Hitler (Pentagon spokesman Jerry
Friedheim was Goebbels), compared Reagan to Hitler for intervening in Grenada.
Then Shirer compared Bush I to Hitler for trying to outlaw flag burning.

By the Reagan years, the left had achieved a banality of
Hitler analogies. Everything Reagan did was just like Hitler. All of
Reagan’s associates were just like Hitler. It was Hitlers all the way down.

President George W. Bush inherited this banality of
Hitlers. To left-wing Truthers, open and covert, 9/11 was the Reichstag
fire, the Patriot Act was the beginning of a national dictatorship and Bush was
a dictator. As Kurt Vonnegut quipped, “The only difference between Bush and
Hitler is that Hitler was elected.” Hitler wasn’t elected, Bush was, but you
can’t expect a left-wing loudmouth to know history.

Congressman Charles Rangel compared the Iraq War to the
Holocaust. “This is just as bad as the 6 million Jews being killed."
(Rangel had also claimed that the Contract with America was worse than Hitler.)
Senator Durbin compared Gitmo to Nazi concentration camps. Senator John Glenn
compared Republican arguments to Nazi propaganda. “It’s the old Hitler
business… if you hear something repeated, repeated, you start to believe it.”
Like repeatedly accusing Republicans of Nazism.

Congressman Keith Ellison, a former Nation of Islam
supporter who had defended its anti-Semitism, compared the September 11 to the
Reichstag fire while hinting at 9/11 Trutherism. Al Gore claimed that
“The administration works closely with a network of rapid-response digital
Brown Shirts”.

Democratic Senator Robert Byrd, a
former Klansman, compared Bush to
Hitler stooge Herman Goering. Byrd, who had filibustered the Civil Rights
Act, also compared efforts to block Democratic filibusters to Nazi Germany.
The “nuclear option” that Byrd was denouncing became a reality under Obama and
Reid, but by then using it did not make Senators Democrats into the successors
of Nazi Germany.

To most people, Nazi analogies summon up images of the
Holocaust and a ruthless dictatorship. To the left however, any populist
reaction against their rule is Nazism. In their world, there is a
battle between progressive and reactionary forces. Any movement that dares
to run for office by challenging progressive policies is reactionary, fascist
and the second coming of the Third Reich. Republican victories are lazily
attributed by liberal hacks to mindless public anger being exploited by
right-wing demagogues.

And so the only thing we can truly be certain of is that
any Republican nominee will be Hitler. It doesn’t matter what he believes. It
doesn’t matter if Democrats considered him a moderate 5 minutes ago.
Accusations of Nazism remain the default argument for a Democratic Party turned
far to the left.

Optimists thought that the Democrats had reached “Peak
Hitler” under Bush. But for the left
there is no Peak Hitler. The same tired line of attack has been trotted out
for fifty years. It will go on limping around the liberal corral for another
fifty years or a hundred years. The Big Lie will continue being repeated to
indoctrinate each new politically active progressive with the conviction that
anyone to the right is Hitler and that every election is a brand new battle to
stop Hitler 2.0 from taking over America.

Goldwater was Hitler. Nixon was Hitler. Reagan was
Hitler. Bush was Hitler. None of the latter three men declared the Fourth
Reich, made themselves dictators for life and ran concentration camps. But
the Big Lie retroactively rewrites the past by claiming that last decade’s
Hitler was a decent moderate while the latest Republican Hitler is a terrifying
monster. Goldwater, Nixon and Reagan were all resurrected as moderate
contrasts to each other and then to Bush. The process of recreating Bush as a
moderate has already begun. And so each Republican makes the electoral
journey from Hitler to a political moderate whom a latter generation of
liberals mourns while complaining that this latest Republican really is Hitler.

About This Blog & the National Black Republican Association

Lieutenant Colonel Frances Rice, United States Army, Retired is a native of Atlanta, Georgia and retired from the Army in 1984 after 20 years of active service. She received a Bachelor of Science degree from Drury College in 1973, a Masters of Business Administration from Golden Gate University in 1976, and a Juris Doctorate degree from the University of California, Hastings College of Law in 1977.
In 2005, she became a co-founder and Chairman of the National Black Republican Association, an organization that is committed to returning African Americans to their Republican Party roots.
Please, no donations.
Email contact: NationalBlackRepublican@Gmail.com