Memes, like genes, are meant to evolve. That's how I read it back before every image file on the web started being called "memes" (especially by
forums people trying to criticize)[memes aren't inherently images].

Of course not, you don't even know what it says if you think that forcing Muslims women to decloth their burkas to vote isn't an infringement of the
1st. So I wouldn't expect you to know what caring about that amendment looks like.

You know DAMN well that the 1st Amendment doesn't allow human rights violations. Don't be coy. This is why I can't stand talking to you. You have your
own conversations with yourself and care little about what the other person ever says.

there's probably less than ten states that actually require a photo id to vote, so for most of america, just what difference is it really what the
person voting is wearing.... seriously???
I managed to get through the first 30+ years of my life with no photo id, and I actually voted a few times during that time.

seems to me that before you have any reason to gripe about what women are choosing to wear to the polls you should be griping about those 15 or so
states that don't require any id whatsoever to vote!

Cutting in here... Excuse me but, Women wearing a burka is the Product of an Abusive Culture. Go back to the 70's when forced blanket wearing simply
didn't happen.

No #. Almost all times a religion forces someone to wear specific clothing, especially women, it is indicative of an abusive culture. It isn't a human
rights violation though and a religion has every right to require its adherents wear certain clothing. If you don't like it, you are MORE than welcome
to not worship the religion. As I don't.

Memes, like genes, are meant to evolve. That's how I read it back before every image file on the web started being called "memes" (especially by
forums people trying to criticize)[memes aren't inherently images].

I know the evolution of that word also.

it's gone from what it meant to just be images, but it's easier to say it that way sometimes. especially at 5am in the morning after a little too much
happy juice

the intent was the same for the image though, if bob can't wear his balaclava, why should she. Full agreement. just wanted to show others the
hypocrisy in saying "Nuh burqas are ok, I agree with them" for things.

I live in a country where a woman wearing a buraq accused a police officer of racist harassment for an RBT, and in court she claimed he tried to rip
it off her head. Sadly for her, the dash cam footage showed her as the instigator, but you know what? She still got off, because they couldn't
identify if she was the actual driver from the footage...

It's a joke.. and used on purpose in so many ways, as to be something people need to be concerned about. Not ridiculed, and argued against, just
because "I'm a feminist" or "I'm a hippy"...

How isn't facial expression covered by the 1st Amendment?
Sure was crickets in that thread.

And spare us the 'religious right' for women to have to wear a specific type of clothes because thee patriarchal society they're subject mandates it.

We express ourselves with body language, facial expressions, verbal language, art etc. Islam is against them all in particular regards to women, and
you have the cahones to claim you care about women and the 1st? BS!

originally posted by: dawnstar
there's probably less than ten states that actually require a photo id to vote, so for most of america, just what difference is it really what the
person voting is wearing.... seriously???
I managed to get through the first 30+ years of my life with no photo id, and I actually voted a few times during that time.

seems to me that before you have any reason to gripe about what women are choosing to wear to the polls you should be griping about those 15 or so
states that don't require any id whatsoever to vote!

They tried that.

It was deemed racist, so I recall.

Go figure.... those who wanted voter fraud, rallied against voter ID. And now?

Well, the democrats are in dismantlement via their own insidious agenda... scrambling to eradicate any outlet that opposed and opposes them. Ahhh but
mud sticks.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.