Has Inequality Really Increased

"Inequality of after tax labor income has increased by 25 percent in the 1972-98 period.
Yet consumption inequality has risen less than 2 percent."

It is well documented that the gap between the richest and poorest Americans, in terms of
earnings and income, has become wider over the last 25 years. But it is less well known that,
despite this increase in "income inequality," the range of consumption among individuals has
changed very little. Although in terms of income the households close to the bottom or in the
middle have not been able to keep up with households in the upper brackets, on average the
lower income group has been able to maintain its spending habits. This is the key finding in
Does Income Inequality Lead to Consumption Inequality? Evidence and Theory(NBER Working Paper No. 9202) by Dirk Krueger and Fabrizio Perri.

By one measure, inequality of after tax labor income has increased by 25 percent in the
1972-98 period. Yet consumption inequality has risen less than 2 percent. What's happened, the
authors explain, is that higher-income Americans have been saving more of their income. This
may be explained by an increase in income volatility in the United States: that is, a household
that is prosperous in one year may have far less income in another year. So, as a precaution, the
well-to-do families will save more of their income.

At the other end of the income scale, households attempt to maintain their living standard
by borrowing more with credit cards, auto loans, or other means. The lower-income families are
also subject to instability in their incomes. Rather than staying in one job for decades, many
workers have been changing jobs more frequently, voluntarily or involuntarily. So, some
households will pile up debts for years; others may find well-paid jobs and pay off some of their
debts.

Credit markets in the nation have responded to these trends by finding more sophisticated
ways to use the savings of upper-income households to make loans to those in the middle or the
bottom of the income scale, thereby mitigating the impact of income inequality on the
consumption of food, clothing, housing, and so on. The ratio of aggregate consumer credit to
disposable income in the last 40 years was flat until the mid-1970s, and then showed an upward
trend. In effect, the rich are transferring resources to the poor - on a loan basis.

"This development was the crucial factor for the divergence between income and
consumption inequality in the last 25 years," the authors conclude, and add: "...the distribution of
current income might not measure well how economic well-being is distributed among
households in the U.S."

One element in this picture is that the inequality of both income and consumption
between groups - say those with college education and those with high school or less - has
increased, revealing that credit markets could not reduce consumption differences between
permanently richer and permanently poorer households. But if one looks within such groups,
income inequality has increased significantly while consumption inequality has actually
decreased slightly, revealing an important role of credit markets in reducing consumption
fluctuations in response to temporary income changes.

-- David R. Francis

The Digest is not copyrighted and may be reproduced freely with appropriate attribution of source.

Support

The research activities of the NBER are funded by grants from federal research agencies, by private foundations, and by generous donations from our corporate associates and from private individuals. The NBER is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization. For information on supporting the NBER, please contact: