Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive222

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.

Contents

Delete. Another concept of merging a Pokémon with something incompatible: unexecuted, as when the intro explains that the phenomenon "has resulted in huge controversy in several unimportant countries like Norway and Uzbekistan." Your last chance to capture the reader and you swing and miss. Could even have been saved by a decent illustration. SpıkeѦ10:42 6-Dec-10

Just plain pointless... not finished, not funny. Frankly, though, I'm not sure what could be done with a concept and execution as tepid as this. ~*shifty eyes*(talk) • (stalk) -- 20101204 - 08:02 (UTC)

Eh, this one's not that bad... just unfinished. Very unfinished. Hasn't been touched since 2008, by user who was also last seen in 2008. The thing doesn't have anything linking to it, either... so I guess this is a 'delete unless someone will adopt it' vote. As it is, it is simply going nowhere and doesn't have much point in existing. Cruel? Perhaps, but it doesn't look like anyone will miss it. ~*shifty eyes*(talk) • (stalk) -- 20101204 - 07:45 (UTC)

Plagiarized. During my merge of Kurvatia (on VFD) into Croatia, Aleister suggested that this part be moved into UnPoetia. He did some clerical editing of it but gobs of it are in a foreign language. It had been added to Croatia on 17-Mar-07 as the final act of Nemesis. Aleister now says that Google finds identical text on Facebook as of Dec-06. SpıkeѦ13:38 5-Dec-10

Delete. It's still a funny read, have a look at it before it goes. But stolen like I steal the orphan's Christmas presents every year about this time. It doesn't make uncy look very good when we dress up sporks with some tinsel, and I should have checked this page long ago before I put the tinsel on. Aleister 14:14 5 12

Comment. - Facebook, you say? Hypothetically, if Nemesis were the original author, or a close friend of the original, would it matter if it were "published" elsewhere first? --Kip>Talk•Works••15:32, Dec. 5, 2010

Ize would have doubts that Nemesis was the author, mainly because when it was posted here it was in a prose layout, not a poetry or song layout, just the words laying there. Someone else spent the time to make it look like a poem, then SPIKE moved it and I worked on it some more to make it presentable. You'd think the original author would have dressed it up in poem clothes before laying it on the page. But that is all theory, of course, without knowing the facts. If the guy comes back and asks "Hey, WTF, where is my original poem?" then we can raise it from the River Styx. Aleister 00:20 6 12

Obliterate. I think this mess has been around long enough. It's not funny, it's got a shit-load of red links, and it's a huge target for vandalism being a Pokemon article. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 04:54, December 5, 2010 (UTC)

It is indeed quite a mess. As I see no real need for such an article nor any framework from which an actually decent one might be scrounged amid this... ~*shifty eyes*(talk) • (stalk) -- 20101206 - 00:18 (UTC)

Delete. Another case of a one-off character in a popular cartoon that lacks enough content for full uncyclopedia treatment and can't attract an author creative/smart enough to create new content. Everything is wibble or regurgitation from Southpark. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:30, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Keep. Towncruft, but decently written. I'll clean it up a little bit and delete the meandering first-person start of Section 1, but won't add {{VFD}}, as the vote seems to be moot. SpıkeѦ14:12 3-Dec-10 PS--Clean-up done; have also contacted the author explaining the risks that townie articles face here. SpıkeѦ14:39 3-Dec-10

Delete... I think? I started typing something in here a few hours ago, but then I apparently wandered off. I'm sure I had a reason, though. Something about made-up stuff and repetition, perhaps? ~*shifty eyes*(talk) • (stalk) -- 20101203 - 06:42 (UTC)

Delete. It is very bad. No reason to keep it. Also I don't see any vfd template but no one says anything to Fudgemobile. I am not the only one who makes mistakes. --M&M(also known as Mimo&maxus)What do you want?Wanna see my balls? 13:55, December 3, 2010 (UTC)

Delete.This entire section was also extremely pointless as it contains only one (make that two) sentences. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:50, December 2, 2010 (UTC)

Delete. As well as the bit of stage direction that Count quotes which slipped onto the page, the article starts out on the wrong foot by telling us how crazy (or how funny) it is. I mean "Krazy," because this job on the eminently ridiculous Canadian military is a big acronym designed to evoke the not-Canadian Ku Klux Klan, a propos of nothing. So we are down to ridiculing Canadians (and George Bush), without specifying anything. And without pix. SpıkeѦ00:33 3-Dec-10

Delete. 2006-cruft. The concept might work on illogicopedia if it had pics, and didn't have the work krazy in the title. --Mn-z 00:56, December 3, 2010 (UTC)

Delete. Wily, what is "the concept"?--to name a thing (which Section 2 finally tells us is a state) "On the Map" and then discover that it is not on the map? Ho ho ho! This is one of the 58 states in The United Play Land Toy, which (below) we are very close to huffing, one of the few non-red links in that list. The article is not about anything. Section 3 is witty dialogue. Section 4 is nagging to the reader. Yikes. SpıkeѦ21:18 2-Dec-10

Delete. No, neither. If this were not an article from 2008, I would follow UnNews custom in the case of incomplete and awful articles planted on the Front Page, and "mercy move" it to userspace for both reasons. Unfortunately, Anon has no userspace. SpıkeѦ16:54 2-Dec-10

Delete, for precisely what Socky said. I mean, how did this even survive? ~*shifty eyes*(talk) • (stalk) -- 20101202 - 17:42 (UTC)

Every paragraph is a whole new hell of cruft. I'd rather read a phone book where every name had been tippexed out and replaced with 'Chuck Norris' because that's hilarious. Myocardialinfarction 17:27, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Mabey not. Intro claims Officer Dave is a school web filter, but the sections instantly turn it into a character about which we need (yawn!) a made-up bio and made-up history, involving Satan. SpıkeѦ17:57 1-Dec-10

Article about a completely fictional band that contains four random paragraphs and a bunch of discography listcruft--—John Lydon 12:50, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Delete. I don't know that the band is fictional; it might just be hopelessly obscure. At any rate, the prose is not going to be funny to anyone other than the tiny group in the know; and the listcruft that follows--one liners that give potty-mouthed puns to song titles--is something I'll always vote against unless paired with really clever prose. SpıkeѦ17:35 1-Dec-10

Delete. Discographies usually lead to unfunny listcruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:51, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

It makes me think someone neglected to read HTBFANJS. Mind, I didn't get very far through it, but usually such things get worse, not better, as they go, and this certainly was... ~*shifty eyes*(talk) • (stalk) -- 20101202 - 08:02 (UTC)

1. This sucks. 2. This subject already has an article. 3. *I GUESS this is only a minor complaint and a petty one at that but* That fucking Nostalgia Critic quote (the fact that nobody besides me seems to know who this dude is here might be a good sign that he isn't as popular as I thought. I advise you all to continue avoiding him and to never check out his shit website which is filled to the brim with (mostly) untalented, money grubbing hacks and one of the most severely retarded fan bases that I have ever seen). 4. There is nothing worth keeping here, thus nothing worth saving and adding to the other article. 5. The AVGN sucks. He hardly even deserves one article. --Roman Dog Bird 00:09, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Delete. I endorse #1 above and have no comment on the others. If this is not cyber-bullying, it is a gratuitous duplicate article with no value added. SpıkeѦ00:46 1-Dec-10

Are you kidding??? Despite its use of {{Facts}} (which I have replaced with {{VFD}} as a favor to you), this is not factual at all, but an obviously crazed misstatement of a foreign-language opera, complete with foreign-language song titles. Even its use of memes is not as tiresome as usual, as the concept that an opera would be built around these memes is hilarious. Needs photos and other graphics. SpıkeѦ17:04 30-Nov-10

Keep. I must admit I'm not an opera fan, so I'll trust SPIKE on this one. SPIKE has written many operas, and has performed at least one in the park while drunk and mistaking a rabbit for an Italian tenor and singing to it. So, yeah. Aleister 19:40 30 11

I am not an opera lover and do not claim it skewers Carmen in a particularly clever way. I claim it is funny regardless of whether it does. SpıkeѦ19:45 30-Nov-10

I rather like it. Not the best, but it plays out good irreality. ~*shifty eyes*(talk) • (stalk) -- 20101130 - 20:00 (UTC)

It's a bit mad but might have some potential in there. Reminds me of a joke in one of the Spinal Tap documentaries where a film maker talks about his 'all white' version of Carmen Jones --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:56, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Delete. What's not sporked from Wikipedia is in violation of article 14 of HTBFANJS: Outright sarcasm is Not a Replacement for Humor. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:27, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Delete. It's worse than that: author creates a mirror-world version of the PowerPuffs (classified under the fake name: an example of forcing the reader to look up an article by its punch line), then thinks we care how tartly he can insult his own creation. SpıkeѦ13:10 30-Nov-10

Delete. Carries all the hallmarks that signal you're in for a crap read here...The idea that you know what the writer is on about without any explanation..a stupid reworking of the cast list..some fictional and mind crunchingly dull/abusive adventures that are just screamingly unfunny in all languages. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:02, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Delete. Bad, not made-upness... that may be even worse than just bad. ~*shifty eyes*(talk) • (stalk) -- 20101201 - 01:22 (UTC)

Comment. It's worse than that Spike, these were real characters in the Powerpuff Girls continuity. This is another example of taking a one off joke/character/episode from a popular cartoon and trying to articlize it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:23, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Does anyone know of a good cheese pizza pic? The only one I found of any use for a page I'm fucking (and she is demanding) is too small and can't be enlarged. Thanks, if you a know of a one. Aleister 13:31 30 11

Delete. For a long time, our article on the cute child star has had an introductory section on his cuteness as a diabolical plot, but that and the photo is the only link to reality; the rest is History of the Future as Lewis becomes the US's 43rd President--in 2359. In the current version, moreover, the intro is an intro of Michael Knab. Has suffered death by Anons; if anyone has anything funny to say about the real Lewis, he should start over. SpıkeѦ23:41 29-Nov-10

Delete.Count of Monkey Crisco invited this nomination in his nomination of Samurai Cowboy Island, below, and I'm happy to, though I don't see why he didn't himself--both articles start out virtually identically and they are in the same, unfunny business, though they had different authors (Farbus vs Pizzacake). If, like the card game where several people play out the same hand, this was a 2006 writing contest where two authors took the same text to see who would produce the better article, the jury is out. SpıkeѦ20:48 29-Nov-10

Delete. I think this one manages to be worse than the other. ~*shifty eyes*(talk) • (stalk) -- 20101129 - 22:23 (UTC)

Delete. An unfunny hash of memes and list. It's the same shit as Ninja Pirate Island. I guess it could be considered part of a running gag, except ninja Pirate Island is also pitiful. The whole pirates and ninjas thing is done to death and I wouldn't mind is someone VFD'd Ninja Pirate Island too. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:03, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

Delete. A vehicle to write stuff about something just pulled from a bodily orifice. Intro and photo caption are classically weak, dithering pseudo-science. No work since 2006 except minor tweaking of the lists. SpıkeѦ20:43 29-Nov-10

Keep. Revert to [2009 version], give it a little listectomy and some formatting and it'll work just fine. Those two bits where Uwe Boll talks about how he would direct The Duel, Jaws and Taxi Driver are funny and strongly written. Hell, if this gets deleted put this version in my user space and I'll revive it. There's enough to work with. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:13, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

sympathy keep the author is actively working on it. If it takes him a while to get the hang on not writing stupid stuff, its better his "sandbox" be confined to as few of articles as is possible. And, there is savable content in the history. --Mn-z 02:39, November 28, 2010 (UTC)

Preposterous. As in the nomination below (which no one will be looking for), if this author is so untrainable that we must sacrifice an article on a noted director to keep him captive, it is why the ban-stick was invented. SpıkeѦ11:47 28-Nov-10

Relax. ~ 12:23, November 28, 2010 (UTC)

Keep. Boll is listed as the director of Spang's user page, so if Spang were here he'd probably vote to keep, so I'll stand-in for him. And this guy has been working on this page and is emotionally attached, so his determined rewrites and our reverts may polish his writing style and create a good user (we can only dream). Aleister 11:44 28 11

Keep. I think we'd be better off just putting in a rewrite template. The introduction's pretty good, and one of my UnNews articles links to it! --Scofield 15:34, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Delete (5)

It's just awful... been getting longer of late, but it was awful even before, so far as I could bring myself to check. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101125 - 22:35 (UTC)

Weak delete. The Wikipedia article offers many ways in which this German director of films, some based on video games, is just awful. The overlong Uncyclopedia rendition tells us he was "created by Adolf Hitler's penis Urethra," then wheelbarrows more of the same. We need an article on him, or this article needs an owner with a sharp scalpel. SpıkeѦ22:44 25-Nov-10

MaxRebo120 has applied 6 edits (and possibly 2 more as I.P.Anon) (at one point removing the {{VFD}}) (among other things, adding the coveted {{Satan Approved}}) since this article was nominated; on his talk page, he admits being a sockpuppet and Sycamore and Mordillo implore him to stop randomizing articles by the addition of categories. I'll withdraw my Delete vote if the Count does what he proposes; but in the longer term, our problem is not with Uwe Boll.SpıkeѦ00:09 27-Nov-10

Delete. Stagnant since 05 until some IP edited it a few minutes ago. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:13, November 28, 2010 (UTC)

Delete. Photo-less vehicle for a few very-inside jokes for the residents of this Romanian city. Endearing pidgin English doesn't save it. Building a quadrangle and then finding the crane is stuck inside was special, but my town has anecdotes comparable to the others (the Police being robbed, the Fire Department being burned) and so does yours. SpıkeѦ22:05 28-Nov-10

Delete. Not about something real ("Klevs" is nowhere in Wikipedia); but too much like a spork; there's a little nonsense but not really amusing; no photos. Untouched for 15 months; possibly a single author (initially Anon). SpıkeѦ16:56 28-Nov-10

Delete. Excellent concept: Morph Saddam Hussein into a Mario video-game follow-on. In execution, merely describes the inventor and applies gallows humor to an awful product. What's missing is clever integration of Saddam's real-life history into the video game world. External links at the end show that author is using us to hump a concept he developed elsewhere--and his MySpace page. SpıkeѦ11:37 28-Nov-10