APPLIED LOGIC: About that Indictment of Those 12 Russian Officers

OK, if you have not been paying attention for the last — Oh, I’d say 20-30 years — this is going to sound like ‘conspiracy theory,’ especially if you can’t keep enough of this in your head to start drawing the connections. However, I can assure you, this is real and there is definitely something here. Unfortunately, we’re never going to know exactly what is going on, or how far it goes — mostly because it involves both Parties as well as the ‘Dark State.’

So, we have a grand jury indictment of 12 Russian officers. Supposedly, these Russian officers hacked the DNC servers in 2016. Well, I do not believe this. In fact, I think it is ‘fake news.’ By that, I mean it is a generated story for the purposes of political agenda. You can call it propaganda, if you’d like. All I know is that I do not believe Mueller is being honest with the American people, or that these Russians are actually guilty of hacking the DNC — at least not as we’re being told. Why don’t I believe it? Because I understand the rules of logic, and logic tells me that — IF the media has been reporting the truth — then this indictment is a fake story. Here’s why I say this.

First:We know that the CIA lost control of malware that can be sued to frame innocent people or nations.

Thanks to the Congressional hearings into the ‘Russian Collusion’ probe, we now know that the FBI and U.S. Intelligence community has been operating as a shadow government unto itself. Some may argue this is not the case, but — as I said — if you have been paying attention, this has been admitted to and detailed in public hearings. So I count this as fact. What’s more, the CIA is part of this cabal, and we know that the CIA lost control over some malware that can be used to frame others for something the person using this malware actually did. This means that nothing the FBI or Intelligence community says about Russian hacking or interference in our elections can be trusted or believed. This is because the source is known to be acting counter to its mission (i.e. they are subversives within our own government, which means, if anything, they are allied with the Russians in a coordinated attack against this nation through Trump).

Second: We have been told the FBI was never given access to the DNC servers.

From all reports, the DNC denied permission for the FBI to examine their hacked servers. Instead, the DNC hired an outside company to examine them. If this is true, it means that the only hard evidence Mueller could have to prove his charges against these Russian officers had to have come from an organization that is not part of law enforcement. That means the evidence cannot be verified, and neither can the chain of custody. In short, that evidence is not permissible in a court of law. So, what was used to obtain the indictment of these officers?

Third: There is evidence that the ‘hack’ was an inside job, done by someone with physical access to the DNC servers.

This has been reported, but no one seems to care. The evidence that the DOJ does have seems to indicate that the ‘hack’ of the DNC servers was done at such a download speed, it could only have been done by a person who had physically plugged in a data storage device and downloaded it directly off the server. This means it was done by someone who had physical access to the DNC servers.

Former NSA experts say it wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak—an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system.

FOURTH: It has been reported that Debbie Wasserman Schultz and an aid are somehow connected to this direct hack of the DNC.

From all reports, the DNC hired the people who hacked their system. What’s more, they were Pakistani nationals who were later allowed to leave the country. President Trump tried to get the DOJ to prevent this, but the DOJ did not comply with the President’s wishes (remember when I said the DOJ and Intelligence community were acting as their own government? Here you go). But more than that, this Pakistani connection is also connected to the hack of the Congressional records.

Fifth: The media is acting in coordination with the FBI and Intelligence community deep or dark state.

We know that the media is working with the subversive elements within our government because of how clear their bias is. Not only do they continue to push the Russian Collusion narrative when there is absolutely no evidence that Trump did anything wrong and tons of evidence to support the accusation that the whole thing is an attempt to subvert a duly elected President, but the media also pushes stories designed to continue this attack on our democracy. If this were not the case, then, instead of trying to nail Trump for something there is no evidence he did, the media would be after the FBI, CIA and DOJ in connection to everything I just detailed. They would be trying to make those connections, where there is actual evidence of wrong-doing. But, instead of doing that, they push stories like this, which drop at the same time Trump is scheduled to meet with Putin, and is immediately followed by a coordinated call for Trump to cancel his meeting with Putin.

And yet, the media barely even paid any attention to this comment, which — to most — clearly indicates a suggestion of ‘collusion’ between Obama and the Russians:

The media hasn’t cared about Hillary’s collusion with Russia in the Uranium One deal, either. In fact, they have defended her. But that does not change the fact that the evidence that has been published is sufficient to have warranted an investigation, if not actually brought charges against Hillary.

I suppose people are free to ignore all of this and just believe whatever they wish, but they cannot do so and still claim to be rational. I am on long-standing record as being against President Trump. I still do not trust him. However, I have not seen credible evidence to suggest he actually colluded with Russia in the 2016 election. On the other hand, I have seen evidence that suggests Hillary and Obama both colluded with the Russians. To what end? I do not know. I also know that the evidence necessary to convict Hillary and Obama of multiple felonies over her illegal email server is in the public record. On top of this, I have seen enough evidence in the Congressional hearings that I would feel totally comfortable voting to convict several high-ranking members of the FBI for subversion. I could even vote for the death penalty based on what has been revealed. It is painfully clear to anyone who takes the evidence on face value that there were people in the FBI and DOJ working to help Hillary avoid prosecution, to prevent Trump from winning the election and, in the event that Trump did win, set a plan in motion to remove Trump from office. The evidence here is clear and irrefutable. And, when the math is done, the only logical conclusion is that the DOJ, FBI and Intelligence communities are subversive elements within our government that need to be re-built entirely, from the ground up. No one should be retained! The evidence is also clear that the Democrat Party is part of this subversive plot, as are a majority of the GOP leadership. And, finally, it is clear that the majority of what calls itself ‘the main-stream’ media is also working in coordination with this subversive element. There is no other reasonable explanation than to conclude that our nation is under attack by people who honestly seek to destroy it: people who are in positions of power within our federal government and the social institutions that are supposed to help us ferret out and remove such elements. The only question that now remains is whether or not we will start prosecuting these people because, if we do not do so, this nation will not, cannot survive!

https://www.conservapedia.com/Obamagate_timeline I agree totally with you. There is plenty of evidence, and a timeline is the best way to pull all the various threads together. I recommend this one and the Russiagate timeline. Also Sheryl Attkisson has one “Obama-era Surveillance” timeline and “The Conservative Treehouse” has several timelines like the “Clinton Foundation Timeline”, The Counterintelligence Timeline”, and the “Shadow Government Timeline”. “Themarketswork.com” has “A Partial Surveillance Timeline” which is a small segment of a much larger timeline being compiled offline. All the necessary information is available to anyone who wants to “see” it. Unfortunately, as you say the media is complicit and so the low information voter is unaware. However, remember that AG Jeff Sessions back in November appointed a special prosecutor in Utah, (John Huber) to work with the IG. He has a staff of 450 people working on the criminal evidence that the IG finds in his report. That tells me that the hearings are the front show to keep the public interest, but the real work is being done behind scene. Noticeably, there are no leaks coming from Huber and his team. I suspect we will hear from Huber closer to the midterm elections. If you follow “Prayingmedic” on twitter or youtube, there seems to be a low profile “counter swamp” group of patriots (mostly military and NSA), aligned with POTUS, using tools like “disinformation” etc, to keep swamp off balance in order to clean out the DOJ and FBI, by compiling indictments against the worst actors in order to restore the Rule of Law. Admiral Rogers would be one of these people. He found the “302” FISA abuses. I won’t elaborate anymore on that. Prayingmedic is a reliable link into that world, and each person must make up their own mind as to its veracity.

Yes, I have. HOWEVER, I am of the opinion that we need to ‘walk away’ from BOTH Parties! I do not see any hope in the GOP. In practice, they are the same as the Democrats, they just talk a different game.

Yes, both parties are Globalists and support the administrative state in their own ways, but there is an element in the Republican Party, the Freedom Caucus, which actually believes in the Constitution and federalism. That being said, the #walkaway movement is not about walking to the Republican Party necessarily, but about walking away from hyperpartisan rhetoric to reason, common sense and dialogue.

There WAS an element in the Democrat Party that once believed in the Constitution. Human nature should teach us that the ‘good’ people will not change the GOP, but rather, eventually, the GOP will change the ‘good’ ones — just as it happened in the Democrat Party.

I no longer believe there are TRUE PATRIOTS in EITHER Party. Anyone focused on the nation and the preservation of individual rights and liberty should see by now that the Parties only see themselves. One cannot preserve Liberty from within an organization that seeks first and always to preserve itself, and then to deceive others into helping it achieve this goal by lying to them. Sadly, this is the MO of BOTH major Parties (and the reason Washington warned us against falling in to a Party system).