Wrong conclusion based on wrong facts selection. First you compare prime Duncan stats vs post-prime KG, then you compare career stats ignoring different circumstances. All stats are good if you know how to use them, if you dont, it becomes like PER on forums, out of place its useless stat.

No. I'm not ignoring circumstances. Did I post stats about team efforts? Nope. Only def rating. Others all indiviual stats.

Just admit it; you're a Duncan hater who claims giving his credit but doing exact opposite. You always show up in Duncan threads and trying to get your "Duncan isn't great that like by told as usual" idea accepted by others.

No. I'm not ignoring circumstances. Did I post stats about team efforts? Nope. Only def rating. Others all indiviual stats.

Just admit it; you're a Duncan hater who claims giving his credit but doing exact opposite. You always show up in Duncan threads and trying to get your "Duncan isn't great that like by told as usual" idea accepted by others.

I understand you have a hard time with fair comparison, and thats why you resort to prime vs post-prime comparisons, or career stats player from HS and from Uni If someone suggest to use apples-to-apples comp, they become haters to you I dont hate Duncan, I always liked him, just I look at facts as they are, along with full picture.