On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 08:13:04AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:> Did you plan to resubmit this with the few review comments addressed?> I'd really hate to not see this in 2.6.36.

I've been doing some more testing on it, and while I can get a 25%reduction in the time to create and remove 10 million inodes withper-sb shrinker, I can't get the reclaim pattern stable enough formy liking.

At this point in the cycle, I'd much prefer just to go with adding acontext to the shrinker API to fix the XFS locking issues (i.e. theoriginal patches I sent) and spend a bit more time working out whichcombination of Nick's and my bits that improves reclaim speed whilstretaining the stability of the courrent code....Cheers,