Justice: Contractual or psychologically Embedded? Two approaches to the idea of Social Justice

View/Open

Date

Author

Metadata

Abstract

I briefly restate the structure and essential elements of Rawls's theory of justice to
facilitate an understanding of its basic narrative, before examining a few of the
critiques of his approach to the question of social justice. Then an approach to that
question is developed, based on an evolutionary psychology (EP) understanding
wherein knowledge and principles from evolutionary biology are used in research on
the structure of the human notions of social justice. This leads to an understanding of
the basic intuitive grasp humans have of the idea of justice from its role in human
evolutionary history, which is then formulated in two principles of social justice. This
understanding is thereafter related to the Rawlsian narrative and its critiques in a
discussion which indicates divergences but also congruencies between the two
approaches. It is also noted that the EP approach offers some insights that are
lacking in justice as fairness but are also in fact supportive of some of its conclusions
and arguments. It is further found that the EP approach has important implications
for public policy.