Sunday, 28 June 2015

Misconduct in public office by Keith Vaz MP and Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions - Report to the Metropolitan Police

Today I have reported to the Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police what I believe to be serious criminal offences by Keith Vaz MP and Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions.

Those suspected offences relate to concealment of sustained, serious Police misconduct which, in turn, was used to conceal (alleged) child sexual offences.

A key figure in the "corrupt relationship" between the Metropolitan Police Service and the Independent Police Complaints Commission was Deborah Glass, the former Deputy Chair of the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

Misconduct in public office and/or perversion of the course of
justice by Keith Vaz MP

Misconduct in public office and/or perversion of the course of
justice by Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions

Gross misconduct including suspected conspiracy to pervert the
course of justice among multiple Metropolitan Police Service officers

I write to report to you as constables suspected misconduct
in public office and/or perversion of the course of justice by Keith Vaz MP,
Chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee, and by Alison Saunders, Director of
Public Prosecutions.

One effect of the perceived misconduct by Mr. Vaz and Ms.
Saunders is to conceal a sustained pattern of misconduct in the Metropolitan Police.

A further effect of Mr. Vaz’s misconduct and that of Ms
Saunders is to conceal allegations of child sexual offences.

Brief background

You are each, so I understand, familiar with much of the
background so I don’t seek to set out a detailed sequence of events here.

The following account briefly summarises some of the
relevant background as I understand it.

In 2007 or thereby alleged child sexual offences against a
minor in the Hillingdon area were, so I understand, reported to the
Metropolitan Police Service.

I have recently seen counsel’s opinion on the primary
evidence which was to the effect that child sexual offences took place.

By a succession of stratagems the Metropolitan Police
unlawfully suppressed proper investigation of these allegations and unlawfully
concealed associated Police misconduct.

The matter was successively escalated.

In time alleged misconduct by Metropolitan Police Service
officers was reported to the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

Following an allegedly unlawful intervention by the then
Deputy Chair of the IPCC, Deborah Glass, a report of suspected perversion of the
course of justice by Ms. Glass was made to the Metropolitan Police.

The complaint of suspected perversion of the course of
justice by Ms. Glass was recorded as a Crime-Related Incident.

There then existed a “corrupt relationship” between Ms.
Glass and the Metropolitan Police Service in that Ms. Glass was investigating
the Metropolitan Police while the Metropolitan Police had a duty to investigate
Ms. Glass.

Separately from the above I reported to Ms. Glass suspected
Police misconduct relating, in part, to Bernard Hogan-Howe.

In June 2014 I wrote to Keith Vaz MP in the context of a
Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into the Metropolitan Police Service
regarding the “corrupt relationship” that existed between Ms. Glass and the
Metropolitan Police Service.

The letter to Mr. Vaz was suppressed by Mr. Vaz and/or the
Home Affairs Select Committee.

As a result of that failure to investigate, corruption in
the Metropolitan Police and the concealment of child sexual offences by the
Metropolitan Police were further concealed by Mr. Vaz and/or the Home Affairs
Select Committee.

The effect of the perceived misconduct by Mr. Vaz was to
conceal what I believe to have been a pattern of criminal misconduct both in
the Metropolitan Police Service and in the Independent Police Complaints
Commission.

The effect of perceived misconduct by Mr. Vaz was to conceal
(alleged) chld sexual offences.

Further, I wrote to Alison Saunders, Director of Public
Prosecutions, informing her of the “corrupt relationship” that existed between
Deborah Glass and the Metropolitan Police Service.

In response I received a letter from the CPS telling me that
they were to ignore the matter.

It seems to me that Mr. Vaz and Ms. Saunders each seriously
breached public trust, in their respective roles as Chair of the Home Affairs
Select Committee and as Director of Public Prosecutions.

I believe that the failures in the conduct of Mr. Vaz and
Ms. Saunders may fairly be characterised as either “misconduct in public office”
and/or “perversion of the course of justice”.

Jurisdiction

Since I believe the misconduct by Mr. Vaz and Ms. Saunders
took place in London, jurisdiction regarding the suspected offences would normally
lie with the Metropolitan Police Service.

However, very serious conflicts of interest preclude
investigation by the Metropolitan Police Service, at least in my opinion.

Conflicts of
interest

It seems to me that there are serious conflicts of interest
which apply to these suspected crimes by Mr. Vaz and Ms. Saunders.

First, there are organisational conflicts of interest.

The Metropolitan Police Service is subject to supervision by
the Home Affairs Select Committee.

The Metropolitan Police Service submits the results of its
investigations to Ms. Saunders’ organisation with a view to possible
prosecutions.

These organisational conflicts of interest preclude
genuinely independent investigation by the Metropolitan Police of these serious
allegations.

There are also personal conflicts of interest in that I
believe that each of you, Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner, were party to
the concealment of Police misconduct and the (alleged) child sexual offencs
which that Police misconduct sought to conceal.

For example, I wrote to Sir Bernard on 17th
September 2014 regarding some elements of this complex cover-up.

Deputy Commissioner Mackey replied in a letter dated 24th
September 2014, in a letter in which, in my opinion, he sought to mislead me
with respect to the “Corrupt relationship” that existed between the IPCC and
the Metropolitan Police.

Taking both the organisational and personal conflicts of
interest into account it seems to me that it is impossible for the Metropolitan
Police credibly to investigate the suspected crimes by Mr. Vaz and Ms.
Saunders.

Given the involvement of the Independent Police Complaints
Commission in what seems to me to be a broader conspiracy to pervert the course
of justice, any credible investigation must be carried out by a UK Police force
outside England and Wales.

In my mind credible candidate organisations to carry out a
criminal investigation are Police Scotland and the Police Service of Northern
Ireland.

Other offences

I believe there is evidence of further offences by Mr. Vaz
and Ms. Saunders.

I believe I can evidence at least one further count of
misconduct in public office by Mr. Vaz.

I believe I can evidence a further count of misconduct in
public office by Ms. Saunders.

In addition, at least one further member of the Home Affairs
Select Committee may be party to the concealment of this matter. Despite a
written request to the secretariat of the Home Affairs Select Committee the
identity of that person is presently being concealed.

Making a statement

I am willing to make a formal statement on these matters to
a Police force which is independent of the conflicts of interest enumerated as described earlier.

Supporting
documentation

I have a considerable body of supporting documents which I
am willing to make available to a suitably independent investigating authority.

I believe that Mr. Michael Doherty would also be able to
assist an independent Police investigation of this matter with respect to
relevant documentation.

I intend to send a copy of this letter to the Child Abuse
Inquiry since I believe the perceived misconduct by Metropolitan Police Service
officers, including yourselves, falls within the Terms of Reference of the
Child Abuse Inquiry.

I am copying this letter to Mr. Michael Doherty so that he
may consider whether he wishes to assist an independent Police investigation
into these serious matters.

Actions requested
of you

I request that you promptly acknowledge receipt of this
letter. Hard copy preferred.

I ask that you each give careful consideration to the
suspected crimes reported to you and that you also carefully consider the
organisational and personal conflicts of interest which apply.

Once you have decided which external Police force is to
investigate these serious suspected criminal offences I would be grateful if
you would inform me in writing.