Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the German Shepherd Dog Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:

Password

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:

Confirm Password:

Email Address

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:

Log-in

User Name

Remember Me?

Password

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Additional Options

Miscellaneous Options

Automatically parse links in text

Automatically embed media (requires automatic parsing of links in text to be on).

I saw that he was charged today, but what about the staff? Did he even have a staff?

05-09-2014 08:05 PM

llombardo

Quote:

Originally Posted by GSDAlphaMom

Update: the board is continuing the license suspension and will meet again in 60 days. They said it could be months before a final decision is made. He told the board in Sid's case he didn't have room in the freezer if he euth'd him and didn't have time to take him to a ranch for burial so he kept him alive and the dog got better. CRAZY!

They also said it wasn't just dogs there were also cats that he didn't euth. One station said he admitted to being a hoarder.

So when the dog got better did he forget how to dial a phone to call the dogs owners? What a liar and I don't see how anything was extended at all. The board is crazy.

05-09-2014 07:49 PM

Sunflowers

I can't believe there are people actually supporting this crazy man.
Because what he has done indicates that something is not firin' on all cylinders up there...

05-09-2014 07:39 PM

GSDAlphaMom

Update: the board is continuing the license suspension and will meet again in 60 days. They said it could be months before a final decision is made. He told the board in Sid's case he didn't have room in the freezer if he euth'd him and didn't have time to take him to a ranch for burial so he kept him alive and the dog got better. CRAZY!

They also said it wasn't just dogs there were also cats that he didn't euth. One station said he admitted to being a hoarder.

It says that the scumbag-vet says it is up to him to decide if a dog is euthanized or not, not the pet owner.

I think that a vet SHOULD be able to decide whether or not they are willing to euthanize a dog, for what reasons they will or will not euthanize a dog. But, they should not charge an owner for euthanizing their pet and then fail to do so. They should say it up front: Ma'am, your dog's ears didn't go up, I'm really sorry, but we won't euthanize for cosmetic reasons.

If they feel the lady will just go to another vet who will kill her healthy dog, they can offer to have her release the dog to them, sign it over. Some people would be happy to do that.

But telling people that they are going to euthanize the dog and not doing it. That is henous. Keeping the dog cruelly for months, even years, well, if there is a greater justice in this world, this yayhoo will be burned badly in a house fire, but live.

One of my vets will refuse to euthanize a healthy dog. I agree totally different situation.

05-09-2014 03:57 PM

kbella999

This is just beyond sickening. There is just so much wrong here. I hope they get the 1 million dollars and that vet goes to prison and gets a visit from Karma. My biggest hope is that the dog will be okay.

05-09-2014 01:38 PM

The Stig

Thanks for sharing the latest developments.

Been reading this thread, and it sickens me to the deepest depths of my being. Since physical torture is um, frowned upon, BURN this sick old fart where it hurts ... be a sting in his side and pockets!