Monday, June 29, 2015

U.S. Homosexual “Marriage” Will Affect Other
Countries

But in a strange cover-up, big leftist media
denies that the U.S. is the leader of the global homosexual movement

By Julio
Severo

Because
of the U.S. global cultural hegemony, the landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling in
favor of homosexual “marriage” will affect other nations, and homosexual
activists in many parts of the world are excited in their expectation to use
the court ruling to advance their cause, according an Associated Press report.

Even
though large U.S. companies (Apple, Microsoft, Google, etc.) and even the U.S.
government have greatly incited the trend toward legal acceptance of homosexual
“marriage,” the Associated Press, whose reports are blatantly
pro-homosexuality, has been quick to detach the U.S. from the leadership role
by saying “The U.S. is [not the] leader in this movement,” ignoring that the
U.S. was the first nation to appoint
a global homosexual envoy for the homosexual ideology and that the
State Department and USAID have been funding
and training homosexual organizations in other nations.

AP’s
attempts to dismiss the U.S. leadership in the international homosexual movement
pointed that other nations, as Argentine, had gay “marriage” before the U.S.

Brazil,
the largest Catholic nation in the world, had effectively passed gay “marriage”
in 2013, before the U.S., but homosexual activists involved in this campaign
were heavily involved with U.S. homosexual activists and their “Brazilian”
propaganda was heavily dependent on data and expertise from their U.S.
counterparts.

Because
Brazil has no global cultural hegemony, its gay “marriage” has not affected
other nations. When the U.S. Supreme Court legalized homosexual “marriage,” the
Palácio do Planalto (the Brazilian White House) and the Brazilian Department of
Education websites displayed the homosexual rainbow — a homosexual celebration
that the Brazilian government did not hold even in the Brazilian legalization
of homosexual “marriage.”

Even
though Brazil and the U.S. are antagonistic in some economic issues, they have had
an undeniable, vibrant and incredible brotherhood in the homosexual agenda.

Similarly,
the Argentinian homosexual “marriage” has produced no international effect,
because Argentine has no global cultural hegemony. Yet, it is very unlikely
that Argentinian homosexual activists involved in this campaign were not
heavily involved with U.S. homosexual activists and that their “Argentinian”
propaganda was not heavily dependent on data and expertise from their U.S.
counterparts.

“The
U.S. decision will have a big impact in other countries,” said Esteban Paulon,
president of the Argentine Federation of Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals and
Transsexuals, adding that his organization contributed documentation to U.S.
legal groups arguing the case before the Supreme Court.

This is an old trick. It is the
same modus operandi of U.S. pro-abortion groups and foundations. They fund and
train activists in the developing world, and when necessary these activists are
used as a showcase to advocate, in a Third World voice, exactly what U.S.
pro-abortion groups and foundations want. They present their trained Third
World voice in the UN system and international forums on abortion and
population control and say, “Are you seeing? They want abortion and population
control and they want our help to do it!”

The
motivation behind these efforts is everything, except good-hearted.

The
United States National Security Council, the highest decision-making body on
foreign policy in the United States, promulgated a top secret document entitled
National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200), also called The
Kissinger Report. Its subject was “Implications of Worldwide
Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” This document,
published on December 10, 1974, during a Republican administration, was the
result of collaboration between the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the
United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

According
to Dr. Brian Clowes, a population control specialist at Human Life
International, “NSSM 200 continues to be the foundational document on
population control issued by the United States government. It therefore
continues to represent official United States policy on population control… The
primary purpose of U.S.-funded population control efforts is to maintain access
to… resources of less-developed countries.”

NSSM
200 is the most important population control document by the U.S. government.
But there was an effort to deny that the U.S. has been the leader in the global
population control movement.

Clowes
explains that nations would never be able to pinpoint the dirty work of the
U.S. population control efforts as direct U.S. responsibility because there was
a strategy involved to escape this accusation. He said, “NSSM 200 also
specifically declared that the United States was to cover up its population
control activities and avoid charges of imperialism by inducing the United
Nations and various non-governmental organizations — specifically the
Pathfinder Fund, the International Planned Parenthood Foundation (IPPF) and the
Population Council — to do its dirty work.”

USAID, which was involved with the
CIA in the NSSM 200, has been using its large population control experience and
sophistry to promote the homosexual agenda around the world.

Last
year, USAID and the U.S. Department of State hosted the third Conference to Advance the Human Rights of
and Promote Inclusive Development for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
(LGBT) Persons in
Washington, D.C.

Leading
U.S. government officials spoke at the event.

The
conference brought together government officials, private funders, business
leaders, scholars and homosexual activists from more than 30 countries to
increase coordination, cooperation and resources dedicated to promoting the
homosexual agenda around the world, and to ensure full inclusion of homosexual
activists in political power structures.

The
conference focused on diplomatic and foreign assistance strategies to address
homosexual issues around the world. It also discussed the best ways to engage
faith communities to support the homosexual agenda and to integrate it into
development programs.

In
spite of this massive U.S. involvement in the global homosexual agenda, the
U.S. big leftist media, including AP, wants to cover up the U.S. leadership in
this movement.

This
cover-up is also happening through diplomatic strategies.

The U.S.
global homosexual envoy recently visited Brazil and other nations to
garner their homosexual experiences and use them to give the impression that
his dirty work is not to advance the homosexualist ambitions of the Obama administration.
Even though the funding, expertise and inspiration come from U.S. homosexual
groups, everything will be done allegedly for the sake of homosexual groups’
wishes from Brazil, Argentine and even Africa!

Twenty-one
countries now impose gay “marriage.” In most of those countries,
well-organized, funded and trained homosexual groups are lobbying for expanding
gay “marriage” rights, especially adoption.

These
movements, which have received funds and training from the U.S., including from
the State Department and USAID, are getting a real boost from the legal gay
“marriage” in the U.S., according to the AP report. They will use the U.S.
experience to advance their cause (“Hey, the most advanced nation in the world
has advanced gay laws, and we should imitate”) and U.S. homosexual groups will
in their turn use their experience for more and more (“Hey, even Third World
nations are embracing the homosexual agenda. Why should we refrain from
advancing more?”)

All
of them are involved in a vicious circle of dirty works. But what will make the ultimate difference is cultural hegemony.

In
his 1997 book “The Grand Chessboard,” Zbigniew Brzezinski, one of the most
trusted foreign policy advisers in the U.S. government (from
Carter to Obama), argued that the U.S. have a worldwide hegemony in the main
domains. He said,

“America
stands supreme in the four decisive domains of global power: militarily…
economically… technologically… and culturally.”

The
Brazilian and Argentinian homosexual “marriage” and other gay agendas have had
no effect on other nations. But if the U.S. wants to use them, they will surely
make a global critical impact.

The powerful U.S. hegemony is now
in the service of its own homosexual agenda and the homosexual agenda of
international homosexual groups that USAID and the State Department have been
training and funding.

The answer to this
pro-homosexuality hegemonic power is pockets of conservative resistance in the
U.S. and an international conservative resistance to repulse the homosexual
imperialism promoted by the U.S. government and big companies.

Homosexuality
brought destruction to Sodom, and it will bring destruction to any city or
superpower embracing it. A remnant of Christians faithful to God should warn
about the danger of sodomy and support efforts to protect children and their
families from it.

“What happened to Sodom and Gomorrah and
the cities near them is an example for us of the punishment of eternal fire.
The people of these cities suffered the same fate that God’s people and the
angels did, because they committed sexual sins and engaged in homosexual
activities.” (Jude 1:7 GWV)

Marriage is
the union between a man and a woman. To defend this original and real marriage
against a fake “marriage” of two men will not save the eternal souls of people.
But it will save children, families and society from psychological, moral and
physical destruction.

To preach
the Gospel and to make it clear that Jesus Christ saves, heals and delivers
will make the ultimate difference among sinners who love homosexual sins and
among nations that love to promote and impose these sins. They will have a
chance to be saved, healed and delivered.

If they do
not want the Gospel, Christians should act prophetically, especially in the
case of a nation that began with the Gospel, was champion at exporting the
Gospel and impacted many nations for the Gospel and now finishes with sodomy,
as a champion at exporting sodomy and affecting many nations in this sin.

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Racist flag and Constitution?

It is
trendy today to ban the Confederate flag in the U.S., but strangely there is no
effort to ban Islamic flags and symbols.

Allegedly,
the Confederate flag is racist — because a deranged man, in a very isolated
case, killed some black evangelicals in a church, while Muslims slaughter
plenty of Christians a day.

Do
you know what? One of these days it will be discovered that the U.S. flag —
yes, the Old Glory — was made by Anglo-Saxon whites. It will be also discovered
the U.S. Constitution was made by Anglo-Saxon whites.

What
about then? Thence, it will become trendy to see the U.S. flag and Constitution
as “racist,” and they will want to produce a flag and Constitution with the
joint participation of blacks, Indians, Chinese, whites, etc.

Next,
it will be discovered that the U.S. flag was made only by people who were not
homosexual. It will be also discovered the U.S. Constitution was made only by
people who were not homosexual.

To
cease this historical “discrimination,” they will want to produce a flag and
Constitution with the joint participation of homosexuals, bisexuals,
metrosexuals and other strange LGBTWYDXTZYSKS creatures.

Next,
it will be discovered that the U.S. flag was made by mostly Protestant men. It
will be also discovered the U.S. Constitution was made by mostly Protestant
men.

To
exterminate this historical “inequality,” they will want to produce a flag and
Constitution with the joint participation of Muslims, Hindus, sorcerers, etc.

Preface by Julio Severo: The
Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church, under the leadership of D. James Kenney, had
active participation in the 1980s and 1990s in the conservative movement,
fighting wicked agendas, including abortion and homosexuality. After his death,
Tullian Tchividjian, a Billy Graham’s grandson, took over the leadership,
withdrawing Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church from the cultural wars. According
to Gleanings:

Tchividjian’s tenure at Coral Ridge
had been troubled from the start. In the spring of 2009, the church named the
then-36-year-old as its senior pastor. Founded by famed preacher D. James
Kennedy, Coral Ridge had once drawn as many as 7,000 worshipers. But it had
been in decline following Kennedy’s death in 2006. Church elders hoped that
Tchividjian’s youth, vision, and name could revive the fortunes of the aging
congregation. Instead they got chaos. Within six months, a group of church
members led by Kennedy’s daughter, Jennifer, called for Tchividjian’s ouster.
Those dissidents were banned by the church. At issue were a change in worship
style and Tchividjian’s rejection of culture war politics.

Tchividjian’s decision to ban conservative
members, including a Kennedy’s daughter, because they wanted to continue Coral
Ridge’s tradition of involvement in cultural wars was an unfortunate decision. His
attitude of shunning from cultural wars has nothing to do with the Graham
family. Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham and president of the Billy Graham
Evangelistic Association, has
been very active in the cultural wars.

Tullian Tchividjian

The affairs of the Tchividjian
couple are an issue only between them and God and their church. But Tchividjian’s
decision to ban conservative activism from his church was a disaster.

Yet, his decision of resigning was appropriate.
May he keep this decision and shun the behavior of some who later repent of
their resignation and want desperately the pulpit spotlight back.

As to the secular media, they are
not attacking him and his family. This is no surprise: Because he shunned
cultural wars, the media is giving him a bonus. If he were involved in cultural
wars, the national and international headline would explode, “Prominent
Anti-Gay and Anti-Abortion Minister Gets Involved in Sexual Scandals!” followed
by a text riddled with acid diatribe.

Tchividjian family

Now, what should we conservative
Christians do? Pray for the Tchividjian family, because not only the gay
agenda, but also adultery and divorce are a threat to marriage and family.

Here is the full report by the
Christian Post:

Tullian
Tchividjian, the pastor of Coral Ridge Presbyterian church in Florida, has
resigned from his position after admitting to an affair. Billy Graham's
grandson said that he has been experiencing ongoing marital issues.

"I
resigned from my position at Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church today due to
ongoing marital issues. As many of you know, I returned from a trip a few
months back and discovered that my wife was having an affair. Heartbroken and
devastated, I informed our church leadership and requested a sabbatical to
focus exclusively on my marriage and family," Tchividjian revealed in a
statement to The Washington Post.

"As
her affair continued, we separated. Sadly and embarrassingly, I subsequently
sought comfort in a friend and developed an inappropriate relationship myself.
Last week I was approached by our church leaders and they asked me about my own
affair. I admitted to it and it was decided that the best course of action
would be for me to resign."

The
pastor adds that both he and his wife, Kim, are "heartbroken" over
their actions, and are asking God to give them "the grace we need to
weather this heart wrenching storm."

Kim
Tchividjian said in a follow-up message to WP, however, that "the
statement reflected my husband's opinions but not my own."

"Please
respect the privacy of my family at this time, thank you. I do thank everyone
for the outpouring of love for my family as well during this difficult time and
we appreciate all the prayers and support we are receiving," she added.

"Several
days ago, pastor Tullian admitted to moral failure, acknowledging his actions
disqualify him from continuing to serve as senior pastor or preach from the
pulpit, and resigned — effective immediately," revealed Rob Pacienza, executive
pastor of Coral Ridge.

"We
are saddened by this news, but are working with and assisting pastor Tullian
and his family to help them through this difficult time, and asking people to
join us in praying that God will bring restoration through this process and
healing to all involved."

Tchividjian,
who has three children with Kim, has also written columns that've been
published in The Christian Post. He has
spoken out on a number of issues over the years, and back in December claimed
that evangelicals' involvement in the conservative political
movement has damaged Christianity.

"Over the course of the last
20 or 30 years, evangelicalism, specifically their association with the
religious right and conservative politics, has done more damage to the brand of
Christianity than just about anything else," the pastor said in an
interview.

"That's
not to say that Christian people don't have opinions on social issues and we
shouldn't speak those opinions, but Sunday morning from behind the pulpit is
not the place," he added.

Sunday, June 21, 2015

Karl Marx’s Spirit in Lausanne: Theology of
Integral Mission

René Padilla: Lausanne upheld Theology of
Integral Mission as the mission of the church

By Julio
Severo

Karl
Marx was in Lausanne in 1867, for an international Marxist congress.

One
century later, another international congress drew attention in Lausanne. It
was not a Marxist congress. It was an evangelical congress on evangelization.
Yet, it gave a fantastic spotlight for Latin American proponents of TIM
(Theology of Integral Mission), which, according to its Brazilian proponents,
is the Protestant version of the Marxist Liberation Theology. One of them is Ariovaldo Ramos, who has praised Hugo Chavez. Ramos is the director of the Brazilian branch of World Vision.

It
was the Lausanne Congress on World Evangelization,1974, where one of its
theologians, René Padilla, was one of the most prominent TIM advocates in Latin
America.

So
Karl Marx was present also, spiritually, at the Lausanne congress, through his
ideology, which was receiving evangelical clothes.

Beautiful
clothes disguise an ugly and deceptive ideology.

So there is an effort by TIM proponents to
hijack the purpose of major evangelical conferences by exploiting any statement
resembling TIM’s socialist feelings. In his paper “Integral Mission and its Historical
Development,” Padilla made his case for TIM by listing a number of previous evangelical
conferences as allegedly supporting it.

I
will use Padilla’s paper as reference to address TIM in Lausanne.

Regarding
the Congress on the World Mission of the Church (Wheaton 1966), Padilla said:

“The
Wheaton Declaration confessed the ‘failure to apply scriptural principles to
such problems as racism, war, population explosion, poverty, family
disintegration, social revolution, and communism.’”

“Population
explosion” was a common subject and obsession among Western elites in the 1960s
and 1970s and it should have been addressed by responsible and capable
Christian leaders not according to elites’ wishes, which led to abortion
legalization in the U.S., the largest Protestant nation in the world, and later
radical societal homosexualization. “Population explosion” is a myth and
rhetorical strategy that disguise population control efforts that include family
planning and are responsible today for the deluge of “homosexual rights” to the
detriment of rights and well-being of children and their families. If this myth had been debunked by
Christian leaders in that time, it could have averted abortion legalization in
the United States, which happened in 1973, with a massive toll today of over 50
million innocent unborn victims.

Concerning
social revolution and communism, whatever interpretation Padilla might try to
give, it is obvious that TIM, in its Latin American practice, was never a foe
for him and his liberal theological colleagues.

Padilla
wonders on Wheaton 1966:

“How such a
document could come out of a mission conference held in the United States at a
time when evangelicalism in that country was simply not interested in social
change or social activism.”

Yet, a socialist gospel was not a
strange reality in America. Apparently, Padilla is ignorant of the Social
Gospel movement, which was born in America in the 1870s. Socialism in the
American society and among its churches was a so serious threat that “The
Fundamentals,” a theological paper organized by R.A. Torrey and published in
1915, had a whole chapter against Marxism and socialism.

Socialism,
disguised as an interest in social change or social activism, is an old problem
in the American churches.

The
old Social Gospel movement dispels the myth that the U.S. evangelicalism had
not been involved in “social change or social activism.” And there are
significant signs that the most important theological liberalism in Latin
America was influenced by it.

Theology
of Integral Mission, or even Liberation Theology, may be the Social Gospel’s
most important offshoot.

A
Presbyterian missionary from the Social Gospel movement came to Brazil in 1952
and spent one decade teaching theology in the most prominent Presbyterian
theological institution in Brazil. His name was Rev. Richard Shaull, and he was
involved in several Marxist and communist causes in Brazil. The birth of the
Theology of Integral Mission (TIM) ideas in Brazil is traced and credited to
him.

In
the 1950s he already said what Liberation Theology and TIM proponents would be
saying in the 1980s and 1990s and decades to come. Shaull’s disciple Rubem
Alves, initially a theologian in the Presbyterian Church of Brazil and later an
agnostic, advocated Liberation Theology ideas before its official launch.

Even
though TIM is labeled as the Protestant version of Liberation Theology, TIM was
born before Liberation Theology. For more information, download my free e-book
here: http://bit.ly/15AJmMC

Padilla
tried give TIM a nobler birth by using major evangelical conferences, including
the World Congress on Evangelism (Berlin 1966), as alleged precursors.

In
his opening address at the Berlin Conference, Billy Graham reaffirmed his
conviction that “if the church went back to its main task of proclaiming the
Gospel and people converted to Christ, it would have a far greater impact on
the social, moral, and psychological needs of men than it could achieve through
any other thing it could possibly do.”

Nevertheless,
Padilla used this conference as a major TIM precursor. He said,

“With all
these antecedents, no one should have been surprised that the International
Congress on World Evangelization (Lausanne 1974) would turn out to be a
definitive step in affirming integral mission as the mission of the church. In
view of the deep mark that it left in the life and mission of the evangelical
movement around the world, the Lausanne Congress may be regarded as the most
important worldwide evangelical gathering of the twentieth century.”

For Padilla, Lausanne established
Theology of Integral Mission as the mission of the church. So, with TIM at
Lausanne, socialism became the mission of the church.

Because
of the leftist influence of Padilla and other Latin American theologians,the Lausanne Covenant said, “we affirm that evangelism and socio-political
involvement are both part of our Christian duty.” The Lausanne Covenant
basically equaled evangelism with leftist political action, a profane union
never done by the Gospel or Jesus.

The
central personality in the 1st Lausanne Congress was Billy Graham. Without him,
there would have been no Lausanne, but even he did not expect repercussion on an
ideological level. When Graham perceived that the Protestant Left was trying to
co-opt everything, he stopped funding Lausanne, and it displeased Brazilian
Marxist Anglican Bishop Robinson Cavalcanti, an old columnist of the Brazilian leftist
Presbyterian magazine Ultimato, who openly accused that Lausanne was under a
“hegemony from a conservative, white, anti-WCC (World Council of Churches) and
anti-socialist group,” etc. (Poor Graham: white, Anglo-Saxon, conservative,
etc!)

Cavalcanti
wanted Graham to continue in the Lausanne movement to raise funds to advance a
TIM revolution. This revolution has been happening, but without Graham’s money
and participation. Valdir Steuernagel, a TIM leader, has said that today
Lausanne is much more TIM than ever. It is not, therefore, a movement with the
Gospel’s face, but with the face of an ideology masking itself as the Gospel.

Padilla
remarked on the results he helped to produce in this TIM covenant by saying,
“The Lausanne Covenant not only expressed penitence for the neglect of social
action, but it also acknowledged that socio-political involvement was, together
with evangelism, an essential aspect of the Christian mission. In so doing it
gave a death blow on attempts to reduce mission to the multiplication of
Christians and churches through evangelism.”

Yet,
“social action” and “socio-political involvement” as “an essential aspect of
the Christian mission” have never been, in view of Padilla and other TIM adherents,
conservative activism. They have always been socialist activism.

Padilla
stresses the same point when he says:

“If both
evangelism and social action are so intimately related that their partnership
is ‘in reality, a marriage,’ it is obvious that the primacy of evangelism does
not mean that evangelism should always and everywhere be considered more
important than its partner. If that were the case, something would be wrong
with the marriage!… Concept of mission as a marriage in which the two partners
– word and action – are ‘equal but separable.’”

So
for Padilla, social action — in truth, socialist action — is as important as
the Gospel is. This is a profane union that Jesus and his apostles never
preached or knew it.

Padilla
tries to make TIM opponents look like upper-class evangelicals in North America
opposing poor Latin American ministers who have embraced a theology to help the
poor. He said:

“In spite of
its opponents, most of them identified with the North American missionary
establishment, integral mission continued to find support among evangelicals,
especially in the Two-Thirds World.”

Yet,
he did not inform his readers that TIM preachers in Latin America are equally upper-middle
class Lutherans, Presbyterians and Baptists, often graduated in European and
U.S. universities, who clash with usually poor charismatic, Pentecostal and
neo-Pentecostal preachers who help the poor in their own poor communities, but
without TIM. They help the poor by preaching the Gospel without socialism. They
encourage their audiences to seek prosperity, healing, health and salvation
from God. They pray for the sick and expel demons. This is a Gospel massively
unknown by TIM adherents.

Because
Padilla has no Bible support for uniting the Gospel with leftist political
action, he has to use major evangelical conferences and their ambivalent or
vague language or even Lausanne, whose language had his active participation.

Besides, intentionally or not, Padilla
overlooked conservative opposition in Lausanne to his efforts to make Lausanne
more leftist. The leader of this opposition was C. Peter Wagner, who was a
missionary in Latin America and knew very well the TIM advocates. He accused
TIM of being left-wing.

Hardcore
Marxist Liberation Theology in ECLCB makes TIM look like, in it “softcore”
socialism, “conservative” or even “right-wing”! Yet, as the example of Rev. Musskopf shows,
both theologies facilitate the acceptance and expansion of gay theology.

Steuernagel’s
upper class status and his higher theological experiences in no way reflect the
experience of the predominant Pentecostal and neo-Pentecostal churches in
Brazil, whose congregations often are composed by members poorer than the
Lutheran congregations, which usually are middle class and higher. ECLCB, which
has embraced Liberation Theology and TIM, is no representative of the
Evangelical Church profile in Brazil.

Padilla
also recognizes Steuernagel’s influence in Lausanne by saying:

“But the lack
of adequate attention to the question of justice during the Congress was
clearly articulated by Valdir Steuernagel from Brazil in a ten minute speech
that he was allowed to give to the plenary at the very end of the Congress.”

Similarly,
other Brazilian theologians do not speak for the Brazilian Church when they
talk about her to First World audiences and international evangelical
conferences.

Paul
Freston, a naturalized Brazilian who has books published in English about the
Brazilian Church, has a story of socialist involvements in Brazil and he is a
key figure in TIM events in Brazil.

Another
TIM proponent is Rev. Alexandre Brasil, a Brazilian Presbyterian minister who
has delivered speeches in Calvinist institution in the U.S. about the situation
of the Evangelical Church in Brazil. Rev. Brasil has kept a high-paid job as a
consultant for the Brazilian presidency in the current socialist
administration.

All
of them are upper class Brazilians addressing poverty issues largely not
experienced by their Protestant segment, but by Pentecostal and neo-Pentecostal
segments.

Nevertheless,
Lausanne has been a platform for these not poor theologians to promote their
Marxist ideas in the name of the Gospel — which has already abundant assistance
for the poor, without socialism.

If
spiritual curses can affect spiritually sick Christians, could the Marxist
meeting of Karl Marx in Lausanne in 1867 and its dark spiritual influences have
affected an evangelical meeting 100 years later?

The
responsibility of a Christian is to preach the Gospel to every creature,
including Marxists, socialists and communists. To inoculate the Gospel with
Marxism, communism or socialism is not God’s plan.

To
preach socialism masked as a “Christian” social responsibility or as “married”
to the Gospel to every Christian is not what Jesus commanded. He commanded Christians
to preach the Gospel of the Kingdom of God and heal de sick and expel demons —
presumably, even demonic ideologies among Christians. Sign and wonders, or
healing and demon expelling, are married to the original and first Gospel.

If
given the opportunity, the Holy Spirit could have manifested himself in
Lausanne and other similar evangelical conferences. Instead, Karl Marx’s spirit
made its Protestant manifestations in Lausanne, which, according to Padilla,
established TIM as “the mission of the church,” leading evangelicals to embrace
and help an ideology that makes the State replace the Gospel in the capacity to
help the poor, heal the sick and expel demons through its social services,
funded not by the pockets of its political rulers, but by the pockets of its exploited
citizens.

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

“For
Obama, gay rights are priority,” said, first of all, Randy Berry, U.S.
Department of State Special Envoy for the Human Rights of LGBTI Persons, in an
interview to Istoé, one of the largest liberal Brazilian magazines.

Randy Berry

Berry’s
focus, in the interview published in Brazil in June 12, 2015, was on gays as an oppressed class, the classical
Marxist and ideological speech. I will focus only on his view that regardless a
Democrat or a Republican is the next U.S. president, Berry makes abundantly
clear that both parties will not affect his post of homosexual advocacy in the
U.S. diplomacy. His view is that the U.S. is in a solid course in the gay
agenda.

He
talked also about Russia and Saudi Arabia. He refrained from condemning the
Saudi dictatorship, which murders homosexuals. Even though Istoé portrayed
Russia in a bad light in the homosexual issue, the only “crime” of Russia is to
have a law banning homosexual propaganda to children. Is a crime to protect
children from such propaganda? In my view, no. But in U.S. government’s view,
yes.

In
this point, the only way for a future conservative U.S. president to prove that
there is something conservative left in the U.S. is politics by appointing a
global envoy for encouraging nations around the world to ban homosexual
propaganda to children. The U.S. has done too much for the homosexual agenda. It
is past time for the U.S. to do too much also against this wicked agenda.

What
about appointing Scotty Lively as a U.S. Special Envoy for the Human Rights of
Children and their Protection against the LGBT Agenda?

The
U.S. has been very bold in the homosexual propaganda. It is past time for the
U.S. to be very bold against this propaganda.

Yet,
if Berry is right, the next possible Republican president will do nothing to
change the wicked course in the homosexual diplomacy of the U.S.

Do
you know what? I believe him. Some time ago, John Boehner, the most prominent
Republican in the U.S. Congress, said,
“We won’t fight gay marriage.” Reportedly, he basically said the Republican
Party will no longer stand in the way of gay “marriage.”

Such
“beautiful” opposition! Democrats and other socialists advance their socialist
evils, and “courteous” Republicans let them go forward.

According
to Scott Lively, ancient Rabbinical tradition holds that homosexuality, more
specifically “homosexual marriage,” was the “final insult” to God which caused
Him to bring the Great Flood. What will happen to America now that even her
alleged conservative political leaders refuse to fight one of the causes of her
destruction?

Here
is Berry talking to Istoé about Russia, Saudi Arabia and Republicans.

Istoé:The U.S. has criticized Russia for being so authoritarian with women
and homosexuals, but, at the same time, the U.S. keeps close relations to
nations as Saudi Arabia, whose acts are worse. Are you uncomfortable about this
situation?

Randy Berry:Our display of values and the sharing of our embrace of diversity are
consistent. In Brazil, there is a big confluence of visions. Our message does
not change when we talk to nations, but, evidently, the talk will be different
in Saudi Arabia. The ability to make changes and the approach varies from
nation to nation. I do not think that there is an only approach working for any
circumstance.

Istoé:Next year, there will be presidential elections in the U.S. If a GOP
candidate wins, will your post be threatened?

Randy Berry:No. The issue I am working, against the worst forms of discrimination
and violence against homosexuals, is not much controversial. I would describe
my work not as bipartisan, but non-partisan. To work with human rights is not a
political issue and I do not see a change therein. Because of the next
elections, people tend to stress differences, but I do believe that this will
be not among the polarizing issues in the U.S.

Hillary
Clinton’s charity received, according to DailyMail, a $10 million donation from
an African church whose doctrines are opposed to gay “marriage” and other
homosexual ideologies advocated by Clinton.

The
2016 presidential candidate received money from the Cameroon Baptist Convention
(CBC) whose official
policy is that the homosexual behavior “contradicts God’s purpose
for human sexuality.”

Despite
this, the Cameroon Baptist Convention Health Board gave between $1 million and
$10 million between 2010 and 2015, according to the latest list of donors from the
Clinton Health Access Initiative.

The
disclosure will be awkward for conservative evangelicals in Africa, because their
money is funding an American who has publicly stated that she supports gay “marriage”
and many other homosexual issues, including abortion and population control,
that are offensive to the Bible.

Perhaps
the African Baptist denomination, by recognizing that the U.S. church blessed
the African church for many decades, wants to repay the kindness. Yet, they
should fund U.S. conservative evangelical ministers like Rev. Scott Lively, whose
Christian beliefs are similarly against homosexual tyranny and Clinton’s
homosexual imperialism.

Clinton
does not need evangelical money. She has received support from homosexual
celebrities like Ellen DeGeneres and Elton John, and many other strong
advocates of the gay ideology.

Clinton
supporters include also the financially powerful Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation, known for its stance favoring population control, abortion and sodomy.

Why
would pro-abortion and pro-sodomy Clinton, who receives money from pro-abortion
and pro-sodomy billionaires, need money also from doctrinally conservative
evangelical institutions in Africa?

This
terrible situation helps dispel two wrong ideas. Usually people think that
Africans are always in need of money and assistance. This rich African church
shows that they are everything, except poor. Other wrong idea is to think that
all investment in U.S. political leaders leads to a better and conservative
world. This poor (not in a financial sense) church has a correct doctrine on
homosexuality, but for years gave millions to an American inimical of its
doctrine. It is pointless if you have a good doctrine and you do not watch and
pray.

When
you watch and pray, you donate your resources according to the Bible to
individuals and organizations operating according to strong pro-family and
pro-life values.

The
CBC’s doctrine on homosexuality is clear in a letter from December 2013 signed
by both the organization’s president Joseph Chebonkeng and the general
secretary Godwill Ncham.

It
reads: “As a church we uphold the belief that marriage is celebrated between a
man and a woman. We uphold the principle that sexual intercourse outside of
marriage, sexual promiscuity, adultery, homosexuality, sexual exploitation,
same sex marriage, incest and sexual perversion contradict God's purpose for
sexuality.”

In
contrast, Clinton’s views on these issues are not the same. How CBC could not
notice such stark differences is a mystery, and a warning to other Christians.

In an interview with a Cameroon
news website Rev. Chebonkeng explains further his evangelical convictions. The
interviewer asked him: “Spiritually speaking, where do you think the idea of
homosexuality is coming from?”

He answered:
“It is coming from the Devil because it is not prescribed by the Bible which
means that if you practice unorthodox things, these are things that are coming
from the dark world and they know what they do with such things, because, it is
unthinkable. Only recently, Cameroonians began to know that a man can get
married to a man. And many people confront me to ask what it means for a man to
get married to a man? You begin to imagine some devilish type of a thing. I
think that Cameroonians should be resolute on issues of homosexuality and these
are not practices that are common in our societies. These are imported ideas,
imported ways of life which are alien to our society. It is time Africans spoke
out on this ill.”

He
also accused America of trying to impose the homosexual agenda in Cameroon.

He
writes: “What the West is playing on is their assistance which they give
African countries and they think that they will peg the conditions for having
that aid on the practice of homosexuality or on the legalization of
homosexuality. I think it is time for Africans and African governments to make
a clear cut stand on that at the AU [African Union] summit so that the West
should know. There are other partners that can give us assistance without
necessarily pegging that assistance to homosexuality and so they are not the
only people that assist us.”

According
to its own website, the Cameroon Baptist Convention dates back to 1841 and was
founded by two Jamaican missionaries, John Clarks and George Prince.

It
claims to have 1,028 churches with a membership of about 105,000 members and a
number of departments including the “Evangelism and Missionary” wing and the
“Christian Education Department.”

The
health wing runs five hospitals and 74 health centers in Cameroon and drug
production and distribution center.

The
CBC website says that
its first hospital, Banso Baptist Hospital, offers family planning services. Probably,
all the CBC hospitals and health centers are providers of family planning. According
to NSSM 200, a declassified U.S. government paper, for decades
family planning was integrated into health care systems in nations around the
world. For outsiders, this was just for family well-being. For the planners
in the U.S. government, its only objective was population control, disguised by
good-sounding names.

Africa
has embraced family planning, which is a population control ideology imposed by
the West. What will hinder Africa from embracing homosexuality as a population
control ideology imposed by the West?

The
homosexual agenda and family planning are compatible ideologies. Hillary Clinton
espouses both ideologies. A church that espouses one will eventually espouse
the other.

A
family-planning church, by investing in population-control Clinton, supports her
anti-Christian homosexual agenda and completely contradicts its higher calling
and mission.

The
original DailyMail report attacked the African church over its anti-sodomy
stance and supported Hillary.

My
report tries to convince this and other churches to make better and
conservative investments in the future, and avoid population control pitfalls.

Do
they want to give 10 million to a good cause? There are fine Christian
individuals and organizations fighting the tyrannical gay agenda with their
mostly empty pockets. Why not help them?