Typical mentality, the man sets up a system that gives the woman no choice, then claims heroism.

I don't claim heroism but yes, I am all for restriction of choice. Women are chaotic entities, their choice needs to be restricted by an agent of order (man) for the sake of both of them but moreso for the sake of their children and society.

You're definitely a feminist whether you claim to be one or not. You have been taught by feminists to value women according to masculine standards, and when women fail to live up to them you see it as a problem to be fixed. You've been taught to hate and reject your own femininity.

The same way Bruce Jenner has grown to hate and reject his masculinity:

Of course, men can never be as womanly as women, nor can women ever be as manly as men. But freaks will continue to try, and fail, then blame everything else but themselves and their own limitations.

Yeah, Bruce Jenner might PRETEND he is a woman, and he might even be called woman of the year by some retarded magazine, doesn't change what he really is - a perverted faggot. Just like some woman might try to be a man, might even succeed in convincing some other clueless retards into thinking she really is one, but it doesn't make her one.

The masculinization of women and feminization of men is dysfunctional and doesn't accomplish anything good.

Women have always been too dependent on men, a brainwashing perpetrated by men in a system that men solely controlled for thousands of years. But what's to be expected when the greatest threat to a woman is a man. "Need us or we'll rape and kill you! Oh shit, it doesn't matter, we're going to rape and kill you anyways as we always have," promised man. That will never change. Women are killed by men more than any other cause, men kill more women than all the current deadly diseases combined, yet men complain that women are chaotic.

Thanks for amusing me, Autsider.

One difference between a typical feminist and myself is that the feminists believe that cooperation between sexes is possible under a patriarchal system with a face lift. I do not.

I AM OFFICIALLY IN HELL!

I live my philosophy, it's personal to me and people who engage where I live establish an unspoken dynamic, a relationship of sorts, with me and my philosophy.

Cutting folks for sport is a reality for the poor in spirit. I myself only cut the poor in spirit on Tues., Thurs., and every other Sat.

WendyDarling wrote:Women have always been too dependent on men, a brainwashing perpetrated by men in a system that men solely controlled for thousands of years. But what's to be expected when the greatest threat to a woman is a man. "Need us or we'll rape and kill you! Oh shit, it doesn't matter, we're going to rape and kill you anyways as we always have," promised man. That will never change. Women are killed by men more than any other cause, men kill more women than all the current deadly diseases combined, yet men complain that women are chaotic.

Nature is cruel and indifferent towards both sexes. Just like there are disadvantages to being a woman, there are disadvantages to being a man. Unlike you, I'm not here to play the "who can portray themselves as more of a victim" game. It's a very feminine thing to do, you know.

Xunzian wrote:You do know the wolf studies were all based on creatures in captivity, right?

I'm not saying that there isn't some metaphorical truth to alpha/beta/theta/omega shit. But reification is poison. You never want to confuse the finger pointing at the moon with the moon.

It's all context based. You've got to know how to dance to the music. I'm not saying it's easy but, come on Gib, it's been like a decade since I've been here. If you were a precocious 13 year old when we met, this is beneath 23 year old you.

Nah, you don't deserve it. Anyways, I already spoke about it in this very thread, in one of my first posts to gib.

Interesting strategy, reducing yourself to filth because you dislike somebody (me). It's like trying to annoy somebody by smearing yourself with shit. I may dislike the smell, but you're the one covered in shit.

You were the one who reduced me to the worst. Don't get your antics twisted. Still, a bobblehead will be your partner if you are incredibly lucky, no one with humor, intelligence, a backbone, and looks, nope. A pretty bobblehead...enjoy your slave.

I AM OFFICIALLY IN HELL!

I live my philosophy, it's personal to me and people who engage where I live establish an unspoken dynamic, a relationship of sorts, with me and my philosophy.

Cutting folks for sport is a reality for the poor in spirit. I myself only cut the poor in spirit on Tues., Thurs., and every other Sat.

I saw your version of feminine standards and it didn't say very much other than an attractive, white birthing machine. That's it? That you can get, your pussy, your maid, your eye candy, and your child bearing/rearing vessel. Your a simple man with simple needs. She appears a simple woman with simple needs. That's doable if you are as attractive as she is. Keep your mouth shut to all the violent, sexist stupidity you have swirling around in there and a dumb one will bite.

I AM OFFICIALLY IN HELL!

I live my philosophy, it's personal to me and people who engage where I live establish an unspoken dynamic, a relationship of sorts, with me and my philosophy.

Cutting folks for sport is a reality for the poor in spirit. I myself only cut the poor in spirit on Tues., Thurs., and every other Sat.

Intelligence is no doubt important in a woman, but without the other things I listed it is useless or even harmful.

What other things did you list?

Being normal is not what bothers you, because if sane, traditional minded women who had children were normal Europe wouldn't have below 2.0 birthrates and be replaced by migrants.

Traditional...means nothing concrete until you define what that is so I understand where you're coming from. Then that conflicts with what you stated here...

In reality I am not American, not Christian, not traditionalist, don't care about the Republican party, my father never beat me and he's not a racist, the environment tried to force liberalism/cuckservatism on me (mostly liberalism) and I ended up rejecting them both in favor of my own beliefs. Pretty sure this makes me a rebel and yes, an outsider.

How would a non-traditional guy expect to win over a traditional lady?

Presuming wolves are anything like humans in this regard, assertiveness is not an attractive trait in females.

In what ways is a woman's intelligence important or attractive?

Define a nasty feminist whore.

Why would you, with your impeccable high (not double) standards, choose to tap a nasty feminist whore sexually? Pump and dump was it?

I AM OFFICIALLY IN HELL!

I live my philosophy, it's personal to me and people who engage where I live establish an unspoken dynamic, a relationship of sorts, with me and my philosophy.

Cutting folks for sport is a reality for the poor in spirit. I myself only cut the poor in spirit on Tues., Thurs., and every other Sat.

I also forgot to note you claim I am responsible for your behavior. That's very typical of females and supports my advocacy of patriarchy, since if us men will end up being considered responsible for female behavior and suffer the consequences of it anyway (and we will), we might as well have authority over it. Thank you for making my case for me. I'm sure you'd enjoy the patriarchal system I propose. Join us on the dark side, Wendy . We have cookies, you just have to get your ass in the kitchen and bake them.

I'm not traditional but I have mostly the same principles as traditionalists, I just hold them for different reasons (I am a naturalist).

Typical mentality, the man sets up a system that gives the woman no choice, then claims heroism.

I don't claim heroism but yes, I am all for restriction of choice. Women are chaotic entities, their choice needs to be restricted by an agent of order (man) for the sake of both of them but moreso for the sake of their children and society.

You're definitely a feminist whether you claim to be one or not. You have been taught by feminists to value women according to masculine standards, and when women fail to live up to them you see it as a problem to be fixed. You've been taught to hate and reject your own femininity.

The same way Bruce Jenner has grown to hate and reject his masculinity:

Of course, men can never be as womanly as women, nor can women ever be as manly as men. But freaks will continue to try, and fail, then blame everything else but themselves and their own limitations.

Yeah, Bruce Jenner might PRETEND he is a woman, and he might even be called woman of the year by some retarded magazine, doesn't change what he really is - a perverted faggot. Just like some woman might try to be a man, might even succeed in convincing some other clueless retards into thinking she really is one, but it doesn't make her one.

The masculinization of women and feminization of men is dysfunctional and doesn't accomplish anything good.

Men are pretty chaotic as well. Maybe we need to design algorithms to replace their decision making as well. Robots are much more efficient. We could also replace all the people's organs with computers too, they last longer.

^ I don't know about her. She's got sass, and is definitely sexy. (I love the outfit, the white one). But is she crazy in the way I like my crazy girls? Like in the ADD kinda way? idunno... Perplex me, this one does.

yoda.jpg (21.23 KiB) Viewed 343 times

Here she is being herself:

Whadya think? Should I call her up? Figure out her phone number? Leave messages profusely?

It is impossible for a human being to go through life not thinking irrationally even if they think of themselves as rationalAlso just as irrational decisions are not always bad then rational ones are not always good no matter what the intention- surreptitious75

The rating of rationality can be higher and always is higher than the person trying to be rational. Rationality is less emotional than the person delivering it.- encode_decode

Is that a demon slug in your stomach or are you just happy to see me?- Rick Sanchez