"No group of people are a single, monolithic bloc. Not all Muslims are radical terrorists. Not all Republicans are oil men from Texas. Not all Irishmen are drunkards. But yet you cling to the notion that the opposite is in fact true. And you then complain when your opponents paint you as intolerant bigots. Why must there be so much aggression?"

Golly, JASON, I don’t know. Why don’t you ask the OCCUPYERS who vandalised, raped, assaulted and disrupted businesses and people who just wanted to live a decent life? Or ask the MUSLIMS who have been fighting against the WORLD for centurys? Or ask the LIBERALS who hate America and want to impose COMMUNISM which has FAILED everywhere and every time it’s been tried?

But tell us this: why do you find it objectionable when we object to verbal and PHYSICAL attacks on our persons and country?

I like that guy in italics, but he's too naive, you can't talk sense into the bigots at Moonbattery. Just let them stew in their insanity and watch, point, and laugh at them down in their enclosure. You honestly can't talk these people into realizing that human social groups are not single-minded collectives of identical clones, because that's they only thing they have to help them make sense of the world.

Don't worry about reprisal from these fucks either. They're bark is worse than their bite.

I like you already, Jason, but you are incredibly naïve, and it worries me that you are hanging out at Moonbattery.

I've long lost hope of reasoning with simple-minded, trigger-happy, and reactionary fools. Someone who says things like "Why don’t you ask the OCCUPYERS who vandalised, raped, assaulted and disrupted businesses and people who just wanted to live a decent life?" is either consciously lying or has clearly lost touch with reality. What separates KHarn and his ilk from the mentally ill is that such people willfully reject reality. For that reason, I can only bring myself to arrogantly mock them.

And in practice (somewhat):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapatista_Army_of_National_Liberation

Or in short: any left-libertarian ideology with a Marxist string of sociol thought it practically "liberal communism"
Of course KHarn has no clue what he is actually talking about and got the definitions wrong.