Hi folks,
I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 27th of
August 2012. For newcomers, help yourself to the website
cuttingthroughthematrix.com; you’ll see a whole bunch of other sites listed
there, these are the official sites. If you find sticking on the com
site, try the other sites for download because lots of folk go into the com at
the same time. Remember too, all those sites carry audios for free
download and they all carry transcripts in English for print-up and if you want
transcripts in other languages you can go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and
take your pick from the choice offered there.

Remember
too, you are the audience that bring me to you because I don’t bring on
advertisers as guests. And I try to, and it’s very difficult of course
because you’re bombarded with news all the time, but the thing is, I try to
stick to the basic facts because there’s extraneous news that is just all over
the place. If you look at history, history is really a system, you’re
just watching a system and the progress of a system, a designed system too, by
the way; it has been for a long time, by those at the top who decided an awful
long time ago that they’d use science to take over the whole world, and that
also meant science of the mind, science of education because they can program
you through education of course – it’s essential you get that initial
programming – and then, of course, media, which you think is all free and
independent, takes over and gives you all your thoughts and opinions from then
on. So, I go through the histories of the big organizations and foundations
that run the world, the “parallel government,” they actually call it that
themselves and Thatcher referred to it as that as well because they take
ex-prime ministers and presidents to get the job done, the big job, because
once they’re out of politics they’re not responsible to the public anymore and
they can get all the work really done behind the scenes and that’s why they
never retire, if you notice.

So, I go
through the history to show you that you’re living through a planned system, an
agenda; and it’s a very intricate agenda, it’s all-encompassing because they’ve
covered every basis, basically, across the world. Not just a global
agenda with happy smiling faces, as they always give you across the sea with
the United Nations but, really, a scientific system where they’ll bring in a
new type of human, eventually— we’re different already; we’re already
bioengineered from the last lot. If you haven’t noticed, look around you
and see all the gender bending and all the rest of it that’s going on— that
didn’t happen by itself by the way. And of course, the people are far
more placid than they’d ever been before as well, when they shouldn’t be and if
you go into the histories and writings of the big planners who worked in their
lifetimes for the global system, who wrote books about it, like Bertrand
Russell and Aldous Huxley, both of them said that eventually they could make
the public happy and contended in situations where they ought not to be; that’s
already happened. People don’t complain anymore about prices or anything
else, they just go along with things and zonk out on television or get lost on
the internet, and something has happened to them if you haven’t noticed.
So, you’re living through a big, big agenda. And as I say, the big boys did
write dry, dusty old books in your library, they’re left there… I’ve picked
some out over the years and only found maybe a couple of people over thirty or
forty years have actually taken these books out to read, because they are
boring, boring books, but they actually tell you the agenda because these guys
took part in world meetings where they designed parts of the agenda, right down
to your cultural changes, and the social norms would all change; what kind of
culture you’d have from the 60’s, 70’s, 80’s, 90’s, down to the present time
and beyond, by the way, and it’s all come to pass because they’re not kidding—
they’re not kidding, these guys that write the dry books. They’re not
kidding. We’re living under it already, for those who don’t know.
And, it’s also called “post-democratic” although they use the term “democracy”
to fool the public. And we’re post-consumer. And post other things
as well.

Back with
more after this break.

Hi folks,
I’m Alan Watt; we’re back Cutting Through the Matrix. And, for those who
think we just drift along and crises develop by themselves and politicians get
in on the act and they solve things in some ham-fisted manner, but the fact is,
nothing that happens on a big scale comes out of the blue— it’s planned years
and years and years in advance. Every single war they do, or “policing
action” as they like to call them, takes many, many years to plan before they
do anything at all and that’s the reality of life: we’re fooled and
conned. Remember, propaganda, and I’ve talked a lot about propaganda,
propaganda isn’t to deceive an enemy: propaganda is to deceive their own
people, you see, in time of war and it’s always been that way and always will
be that way. So you’ll never get truth on what you think of as your
government, why they’re doing something— it doesn’t happen. They don’t
come out and tell you the truth; that’s why they have propaganda, which they
call public relations departments, you see. And they give handouts to the
media all the time, that’s only too happy to put them right in (it saves them
writing up a piece themselves), so it’s all done for them. The Pentagon
does it, straight out; I’ve done the articles before where they just hand out
these multiple handouts and email them off to all the newspapers and it’s put
straight in. Same on the weather modification, weather control, and even
weather modification denial— that’s all handed out there too. You’re
living in an amazing system of deception, and it’s planned that way. And
many of the big boys like Brzezinski talked about it, that eventually people
would be unable to think for themselves— they’d look to the media, and
especially television, to tell them what to think or believe and give them
their opinions as well. And he wrote that forty-odd years
ago. It was already there back then, mind you; it was working then
too.

So, tonight
I’ll put up a link as well to show you. It’s from one university and you
have go through them all, of course, if you want to spend a thousand lifetimes,
but the fact is this university is from Pennsylvania of course, and it says…

Think Tanks and Civil Societies
Program

Alan:
And it’s got a list of Think Tanks in here that just astonishes you, and that’s
not them all, that’s only a few. But it shows you what they’re up to, the
top think thanks, their operating budgets; those below $5 million a year for
budget and those above 5 million dollars, expert panels, etcetera, and how they
basically give you everything that you think is real, including your topics to
argue over and everything else. And, as I say, it gives you Think Tanks
rankings in categories and it’s for 2011, it was published in 2012. But
it’s just astonishing. And this is just, as I say, one university doing
this. But I’ll put this up tonight for those who have an interest in
going through dry stuff, dry boring stuff.

And some
people say to me, "why don’t you put more feeling into what you’re
saying? It’s such terrible stuff.” Well, I’ve always been like this
because, you see, I’ve always known what was going on. You only get upset
if you’re just waking up or if you still can’t bring yourself to believe
it. You know, that’s why you get upset. And so, this is the reality
that we live in. So I’ll put this up tonight for those, as I say,
who are a bit beyond all of that and are into reality— true reality.

Part of it
too, as I’ve mentioned before and the big boys themselves that wrote so much
about it and spoke so much about it and even did books about it, some even
fictional books which were awfully good because some of them were allowed to do
this. Fiction, remember, is called “predictive programming” for the public; you
get lost in a movie or a story or a novel and it gives you ideas, it implants
ideas in your mind of possibilities and then when they really happen you act
towards them as though they were rather familiar to you and it must happen—
it’s progress they call it. So people like Aldous Huxley wrote Brave New
World in the 1930’s to do with the controlled society where they’d be beyond just
simply culling off all the “old types” or the “defunct types,” the kinds in a
post-industrial society; they’d gone beyond that and they had a perfectly
balanced society of population control and no one mated the old-fashioned way
for procreation purposes and they were all promiscuous certainly but they
couldn’t have children, it was all done by exogenesis, outside the human body,
and, of course, they tampered with the genes and so on— and that was in the
1930’s remember, and it was awfully well done. And you can watch the
movies, there’s two movies out, on Brave New World, at least two versions,
maybe three, for those who don’t want to read the books.

There’s an
article here and it’s pretty typical too and it’s from different articles in
the mainstream. They can put stuff in the mainstream today but people,
like I mentioned the other day with Jacques Ellul talking about the news, the
person who wants to get the news, the average Joe who tunes in to the 6 o’clock
news, never retains it— they don’t retain it. It’s kind of unreal to them
and they’re not getting news at all because it’s all authorized stuff they’re
being told, to shape their minds for the controllers’ purposes. This one
here is about...

In a report published last April by
the Royal Society titled People and the Planet, the elitist UK-based society
calls for massive population reduction and de-industrialization of the west.

(A: Well,
we’re already pretty well deindustrialized.)

However drenched in euphemisms, the
report cannot conceal its ominous undertones. Listed among its “key
recommendations” the report proposes several measures similar to the one put
out recently by MIT in which a drastic reduction of the population is called
for in the name of “modelling” and predictions.

Immediately after the Royal Society
released its call for more death and mega-cities, none other than Paul Ehrlich

(A:
You know, they revive him every so often.)

weighed in to regurgitate his own
eugenic fancies. The Guardian reported that Ehrlich, who contributed to the
report, eagerly endorses its conclusions. In regards to redistributing wealth,

(A:
And they’re all commies at the top; at least they pretend to be. But you
must understand the real communists are very elitist, incredibly elitist.
They don’t believe that we’re all equal at all. They really believe in
this distribution of labor with themselves at the top doing all the ordering
around, you know. It says...)

In regards to redistributing
wealth, Ehrlich is quite upfront about his opinion on the matter:

(A:
Remember too, the elitists, I should say, also funded communism because they
thought it would be the best way to manage the population of the world, and
there’s less freedoms under it, the state guides you along all your paths right
from birth to death and that’s why they thought it would be far better to have
a communistic, or socialistic, system and the bankers, of course, were all
behind it— it’s far tidier on their books you see, very tidy.)

The Guardian reported that Ehrlich,
who contributed to the report, eagerly endorses its conclusions. In regards to
redistributing wealth, Ehrlich is quite upfront about his opinion on the
matter:

“They (population and resources)
multiply together. You have to deal with them together. We have too much
consumption among the rich and too little among the poor....”

(A:
It’s a lie too because what they really mean by that is the first world
countries have to come right down to the bottom and be poor as well. And
we’re already doing that. Your governments have for a long time been
taking your tax cash and spreading it on all kind of things, but including
throwing it across the world, supposedly to third world countries but it goes
to where they have their latest general in charge of some country, some third
world country, and then they bring all their sweat factories into it. It
says...)

“How many of your support depends
on lifestyles.”, Ehrlich stated. “We came up with 1.5 to 2 billion because you
can have big active cities and wilderness. If you want a battery chicken world
where everyone has minimum space and food and everyone is kept just about alive
you might be able to support in the long term about 4 or 5 billion people. But
you already have 7 billion. So we have to humanely and as rapidly as possible
move to population shrinkage.”

(A:
That sounds better than killing you off—population shrinkage. It’s like a
lot of rain and you’re just going to get small or something.)

Then Ehrlich plays the harp strings
of fear, making more veiled death-threats:

“The question is: can you go over
the top without a disaster, like a worldwide plague or a nuclear war between
India and Pakistan? If we go on at the pace we are there’s going to be various
forms of disaster. Some maybe slow motion disasters like people getting more
and more hungry, or catastrophic disasters because the more people you have the
greater the chance of some weird virus transferring from animal to human
populations, there could be a vast die-off.”

(A:
This is what these guys dream about at night, you know.)

Some of the conclusions of the
Royal Society report:

“The most developed and the
emerging economies must stabilize and then reduce material consumption levels
through: dramatic improvements in resource use efficiency,

(A:
That means bureaucracies handling it all and public-private partnerships, big
corporations.)

What the Royal Society terms
“systematically decoupling economic activity from environmental impact” is
actually a rephrasing of Agenda 21’s plan to gradually de-industrialize the
west as well as the creation of megacities in which the bulk of the world’s
population can be locked up to make them more manageable. Or, what the Royal
Society calls “the potential for urbanisation to reduce material consumption.”

(A:
Now they had some old documentaries up on youtube from the BBC and one of them
was from even the fifties, I think, and you hear the guy then talking, as they
show you a little very early satellite image of the world, he says that we’ve
got to stop this urban sprawl and concentrate the public into cities.
It’s an old agenda, you understand. Your whole life long is only part, a
small part of a vast agenda. Anyway, getting back to this article, it
says...)

In a statement put out by “Planet
Under Pressure” in the run-up to the 2012 “Earth Summit” several scientists
called for denser cities in order to mitigate worldwide population growth. When
in doubt that UN’s Agenda 21 is not the Mein Kampf of our day, one should
consider yet another in-your-face confession from yet another certified
biocratic control freak.

According to an MSNBC article one
of the scientists while speaking about human populations worldwide, stated:

“We certainly don’t want them
strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by
living closely [together].”

(A:
And I’ve got the link for that too, the guy that said all that.)

Insisting the world’s population be
locked up within the confounds of mega-cities, the elite realizes that if the
herd is to be properly controlled walls are needed- thick walls, and by
constructing these walls, making the masses go this or that way will be made
easier.

A: And
that’s where it’s all going folks.

Back with
more after this break...

Hi folks,
we’re back Cutting Through the Matrix, and talking about the big cull that they
want to come and, of course, you can do it the slow way too; the rising cancer
rate tells you something big is going on, and they’re not too concerned about
the reason, which means they obviously know the reason, which meant they
created it, I would imagine. So, you’re living through a massive
agenda.

(A:
Now remember, from the United Nations own website they tell you the population
growth in every country in the world. Every year they come out with it,
but they also admit that most it is from immigration from third world countries
to first world countries. If it wasn’t for that, we’d be
plummeting; in fact, they actually say that, that the people who were
already there before the mass immigration came in, in the last 40 years or so,
are dieing off. They’re not having children because they were awfully
good and they copied the lifestyle they were told to have: go after the
material goods, don’t have children, be promiscuous but don’t have children—
don’t worry, if you do have any problems the state will take care of it for
free. So, they have massive immigration coming in because they say that
they need – the politicians say that (they’ve all said that, by the way, even
the present ones) – immigration because the original people are not having
children, you see, and they’ve got to pay off the national debt, they
say. It says...)

“If cities can develop in height
rather than in width that would be much more preferable and environmentally not
as harmful”, Fragkias said.

People who know anything about
history know that the creation of mega-cities in which the masses may be
rounded up and enclosed, is identical to the Nazi principle of the “ghetto”...

(A:
I’d say it’s also actually more identical to the Russian Soviet system, the
Bolshevik system, where they actually boasted, Lenin boasted and so did the
rest of them, that they were killing off an entire class of people, which they
did. And not just the middle classes and the intelligentsia, but they
killed off pretty well the whole farming class, even tiny small farmers.
And by the way, China is the same way. Communist systems are
always the same. They’re all on board with this big, big city thing
and very few folk living on the land— just enough to feed them, you see.
So, it’s the same system. And who is backing it up? Well, the big
international banking boys, because they funded communism in the first
place. So...)

Some of the organizers of “Planet
under Pressure” are founding their plea on the notion that we (as humanity)
have entered the “Anthropocene”: a new geological era in which humans- not
natural conditions- are the main drivers of geological and meteorological
processes. Citing a website devoted to this concept, Martin Rees of the Royal
Society stated at the conference:

“This century is special in the
Earth’s history. It is the first when one species — ours — has the planet’s
future in its hands,” reported the AFP news agency. “We’ve invented a new
geological era: the Anthropocene.”, he stated.

This echoes yet another scientist,
a professor at the University of Colorado, who in recent times also mentioned
this new era in relation to a call for population control when he stated:

“Scientists now speak of humanity’s
increased demands and impacts on the globe as ushering in a new geological
epoch: the Anthropocene. Such selfish and destructive appropriation of the
resources of the Earth can only be described as interspecies genocide.”

(A:
And it’s fantastic too when you see all these guys belong to these big
ThinkTanks that are funded by the big international corporations that are the
guys that are ripping up the planet. So you’ve got to start wondering
about things, you see. The fact is, you see, they’ll use any excuse they
can to cull off what they now see as an obsolete part of humanity in a
post-industrial society. It says...)

In addition the professor said:
“Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary condition for
preventing catastrophic global climate change....

(A: Well
they’ll use that as they spray us like bugs at the bottom every day from the
skies, and they have been for years. So they’ve got all these different
articles in it. It’s all our fault, you see; it’s too much of you, not
them, but too much of you, you see. And it says...)

The report also stressed that
education should be entirely brought under control of the UN:

“In order to meet previously agreed
goals for universal education,

(A:
And that’s what the whole point of UNESCO and so on is.)

policy makers in countries with low
school attendance need to work with international funders and organisations,
such as UNESCO, UNFPA, UNICEF, IMF, World Bank and Education for All. Financial
and non-financial barriers must be overcome to achieve high-quality primary and
secondary education for all the world’s young, ensuring equal opportunities for
girls and boys.”

(A:
What they really mean by that is the same indoctrination on all this stuff I’ve
just been reading so that they’ll all believe it, you see; that’s what it’s
for. Education has always been for propaganda purposes. And it
says...)

In 2004, emeritus professor of
physics at California State University, Roger Dittmann, stated that all
policies related to Agenda 21 should be pursued with the aim of worldwide
population reduction and population control. “The Big Die Off,” the professor
eagerly added, “has already begun.”

In his presentation Sustainable
Development, the New International Scientific Order, and UN Reform Dittmann
gives his own definition of the term “sustainable development:”

“Economic (and other) development
that leads to reduction in population toward an optimum level for maximization
of the quality of life, i.e. environmentally benign development that reduces
the birth rate,” Dittmann explains on page 14 of his lecture notes.

In order to facilitate such a massive
“die-off,” the professor proposes (page 18) global governance to make sure the
directives will be universally applied...

A:
And most folk will listen to this and not believe it because they’ll believe
that their favorite comedians on television, or whatever it happens to be, will
come out and tell them, "oh, wake up, be very alarmed," and of course
that won’t happen, but they do look to the media to think for them, like
Brzezinski says, to do their reasoning for them. That’s why they can
print this stuff openly too. They’re very blatant, you know, and they
mean business.

Back with
more after this break...

Hi folks,
I’m Alan Watt. We’re back Cutting Through the Matrix, and I’m talking
about the reality of the world. Most folk don’t like reality. Some
try to escape into the past and say “we can get America back” or something like
that; in reality, this agenda is going on whether you like to think you can get
America back or not. I mean, it’s been going on long before you were born
in fact— long before you were born. Because eugenics is a very old, old
idea and even at the beginning of the 20th Century the U.S. was
leading the world with its “better families” program where they gave awards to
people that they thought had the best skull shapes and they’d measure their
nose to their ears and all that kind of stuff, and of course they had to be
fairly wealthy too because, you see, they claim that you have a “poverty gene”
and they have to get rid of all those with the “poverty gene”. I’m not kidding about this— I’m not kidding
at all. So, getting back to this article here, and it says that…

In order to facilitate such a
massive “die-off,” the professor [Dittman] proposes (page 18) global governance
to make sure the directives will be universally applied:

“Since this is a global effort, it
requires global organization, both governmental and popular,” he writes.

Dittmann’s specific remark
concerning this “big die off” echoes Paul Ehrlich in response to the Royal
Society’s report. Veiled threats from the most vicious of neo-eugenicists the
world has ever known. I don’t have to remind readers that all this talk of
death and mass-death is becoming more common every day.

(A:
And it certainly is. But most folk switch off to it; getting back to Propaganda
by Jacques Ellul, how it works on the public. Anyway, it says...)

Only recently I highlighted the
case of University College’s Emeritus Professor John Guillebaud, patron of the
UK-based “Population Matters”, who depicted among other things a machine-gun, a
hospital bed, and a knife dripping with blood, as examples of “natural”
population control as opposed to “artificial” methods such as contraception and
family planning.

(A:
And I’d also add into it your xenoestrogens that you’re eating, and it’s in all
your food and all the rest of it, that turn you sterile, nevermind all the
inoculations you get that help that along the path as well. And...)

Back to Dittmann’s 2004
presentation. In his notes he also calls for a new “International Scientific
Order” to make sure the entire scientific community is armed and ready to
implement worldwide population reduction. Dittmann:

“Not only do people require
organization about their (multiple) identities (including professional,
scholarly, and scientific), they need international, even supranational
affiliation, facing a common adversary.”

(A:
Now these are articles that you have been programmed that only come out of the
mouths of guys in uniforms, screaming at microphones, from old black-and-white
documentaries. And these are coming from scientists today, and they’re
all over the place folks, but you don’t react to them. And I know why you
don’t react to them. Anyway, it says...)

This common adversary-remark is
completely in the spirit of the Club of Rome’s 1993 The First Global Revolution
in which the authors state:

(A:
They said that in the seventies too...)

“In searching for a new enemy to
unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global
warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed
attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is
humanity itself.”

(A:
And remember what it says in the beginning— that’s the important part: In
searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea..."
idea, folks..."that pollution, the threat of global warming, water
shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill." So, you see,
they were given the task by the United Nations and the big elite boys at the
big foundations to find a way to unite the planet into this agenda so as it
would seem more real to them. And, it says...)

To illustrate that in the case of
professor Roger Dittmann we are not dealing with some isolated mad scientist in
a cellar-lab, his own resume will suffice:

“He served on the Executive Board
of the World Federation of Scientific Workers (WFSW), in which he has been
active since 1967, and has represented the WFSW at the United Nations. He
presides over the U.S. affiliate of the WFSW, the U.S. Federation of Scholars
and Scientists, founded in 1937 as the American Association of Scientific
Workers,

(A:
It used to be an old communist organization...)

which is also affiliated with the
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). He has also served
as Chair of the Southern California Federation of Scientists, on the National
Council of the Federation of American Scientists, as well as on the Executive
Board of the Pacific Division of the AAAS. He has extensive international
contacts and experience, including working with UNESCO.”

A:
So, I’ve gone through all the history of UNESCO too with Julian Huxley (that
was Aldous’s brother) and his big speeches that he gave and from his own books
as well – quite fascinating – because he was all on board with this back
then. But most folk will never believe it, because, you see, you can’t
believe something if you’re watching television— you can’t do it. You
can’t watch horrific stuff happening and then tune into happy commercials about
silly things like toothbrushes and they’re all smiling and having orgasms over
this new toothbrush, and then you watch a comedy. And plus, you see, you
have been trained – trained – to always turn away from the negative, things
that make you feel unpleasant and unhappy; you’ve been trained. And the
big boys talked about this too, like Russell. He says we’ll train the public to
always seek pleasure and happiness, and always negate and shy away from the
realistic stuff, the stuff that really matters; and that’s happened. So
your ability for survival has already been damaged if not eliminated altogether
with most folk. I’ll put this article up tonight at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com for those who want to read all the rest of it, and
there’s a lot of links there too, and it’s factual, and most folk won’t want
to. They’ll go and vote for some new prune that they’ll put up for you to
vote for, hoping (because people live in hope, you see, not realism and
reality— they live in hope) that some guy is going to have a brain tumor or
something and become a nice guy in politics. They’re all put in by the
same organization that runs the world: The Council on Foreign Relations, which
belongs to the Royal Institute of International Affairs, as does the Royal
Society and a whole bunch of other things; and they also set up the United
Nations, by the way.

And tonight
too I want to put up some links about geo-engineering, from the government, and
one of them here is to do with…

Unilateral Geoengineering

A: And it
was a workshop they had at the Council on Foreign Relations – again, the guys
that run the world and run all the media; and top scientists are members and
they even have actors in it now too because you all follow celebrities because
you can’t think straight and so they get actors on board as well. And it
says, this was 2008, and it’s a summary of the need to inject “light-reflecting
particles into the stratosphere”. Now, they were doing it constantly
since 1998 but they’re still putting this stuff out to the lower-level members;
again, it’s a form of psychic driving; the more you see these articles the more
you think it’s real and they won’t have to tell you, "oh, by the way,
we’ve already been doing it since 1998 anyway." This is to make you
think that they’re maybe going to do it. These last few days I’ve watched
them spraying us like bugs up here where I live. There was actually two
weeks of blue sky – blue sky – like we used to get before 1998 came along, and
it brought back some memories, that too. Most folk won’t remember, but
they actually had real blue skies, not this fuzzy whitish stuff that they do
from all their spray.

And I’ll
also put up too another one to do with weather modification activities reports,
and it’s from NOAA (you know) and it’s the official site and all the rest of it
and it’s got the CFR citation at the end of it as well (because they’re into
everything), but it’s got an initial report on weather modification activities,
weather modification interim, and final report as well. I’ll put that up;
there’s also two PDFs on that one itself that goes into a few things, they just
touch on it. And also, ‘Geoengineering: Parts 1, 2 and 3; the Hearing Before
the Committee on Science and Technology; House of Representatives,’ and it goes
through a whole bunch of stuff on geoengineering as well, for those who think
it’s all pie in the sky and whatever they’re doing it must be for our own good,
obviously, even though they fudge all the figures and all the rest of it. You
understand, weather has never been static; like you don’t hit a particular date
and you’re in spring: that’s only on the calendar, it doesn’t happen in
reality. You don’t always have a wet summer or a dry summer— it happens
once in a while and that’s how things actually work. So, folk have no
memory anymore because they don’t live outside and they don’t look up at all
and they live in a controlled environment from their houses to their cars to
their office or to the mall and they don’t really have anything to go by, by
their own memory; that’s why it’s so easy to con and fool the public.

As China is
expanding, so are its gangsters, moving out, and they’re also getting kicked
out of countries now…

They lured women to Angola,
promising well-paid jobs, but then forced them into prostitution, Chinese
police said.

Tens of thousands of Chinese live
in Angola, and Chinese state-run firms have large interests in the country.

China’s Ministry of Public Security
said a special police team was sent to Angola in July to help investigate
criminal gangs.

The ministry said the officers had
helped their Angolan counterparts break up 12 gangs and free 14 victims, most
of whom were thought to be women forced to work as prostitutes.

(A: And...)

The 37 suspects arrived at Beijing
airport in handcuffs with balaclavas covering their faces.

A:
So, they’ll be for the chop; that’s how they do it over there because the only
organized crime you can have is the government, you see— the same everywhere
else.

And this
one here is on ecosystems. CGIAR, it’s called, like cigar, almost like a
cigar….

The CGIAR Research Program on
Water, Land and Ecosystems will be holding an official launch event at
Stockholm Water Week on Tuesday, August 28 at 5.30 pm at the IWMI-CGIAR booth.
The event will be an informal opportunity to socialize and learn more about the
program. In addition, you can learn more about the program through talking with
the Program Director....

(A:
etcetera...)

The CGIAR Research Program on
Water, Land and Ecosystems, one of CGIAR’s most ambitious research programs to
date is a ten year commitment to bring about a radical transformation in the
way land, water and natural systems are managed. It is one of the largest programs
with 14 partners, including FAO and is being led by the International Water
Management Institute,

(A:
I’ll repeat that, "International Water Management Institute," for
those who didn’t hear it very well.)

which has just been named this
year’s Stockholm Water Prize Laureate.

A: They
love giving prizes to each other because it will be the biggest boys out there
that are backed by all the top ones, you see— all their own people.
And it’s got a list of different directors, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
And they’re tied in with other organizations too, as I say; that one to do with
the International Water Management Institute— they’re also having a big
festival this year as well, to get you used to the idea.

Australians,
of course, are really getting hammered now with free trade and even the
ex-treasurer came out last week and said that companies should just leave the
country now if they want to make a profit, they’ll never make it in Australia
and he’s advising all the businesses to pack up and move. They’re getting
it all late, we had it a while ago, of course, because we signed the World
Trade Organization’s treaties and the GATT treaty and all the rest of it.
But now, of course, the same thing is happening there too. It says…

Laws passed today will allow
authorities to collect and keep Australians’ internet records, including their
web-browsing history, social media activity and emails.

(A:
It also, by the way, does all their medical stuff as well, so, they have that,
and they can also hand it off to private companies. So...)

The laws will also allow Australia
to accede to the Council of Europe Convention on Cyber-crime, which has 34
members.

A:
Cyber-crime means they’ve got to watch all of you, you see. Isn’t it
wonderful? Isn’t it wonderful when you’re at the top and you can just use
neurolinguistics to con the public until they can’t really figure it
out... "Is that really what I think it is," you know. But
that’s how life really is, folks.

In Britain
too, you never got mosquitoes in Britain, but of course they bred them there
because the old Porton Down laboratory was specializing in viral and bacterial
warfare, as Canada was; Canada actually leads the world in it. And
they actually took some of the big (we call them “bomber“) mosquitoes from
Ontario; these ones are specially bred in a lab further south of me, even from
World War II onto the present time and the bigger the mosquito, you see, the
more you can load it up with more viruses, more bacteria for a loading dose: to
get infected you’ve got to get a loading dose so the bigger the loading dose
the better. They also sent them over to Britain. But you never got
mosquitoes in Britain: you just didn’t get it. And this article was kind
of funny because it says…

Britain’s washout summer brings a
plague of mosquitoes and fleas to the UK

A:
And even it says they’re "mozzies", "mozzies," like the
nickname that you use in countries that you normally get them, as though they’d
always had them in Britain, and I guess people now probably think they did
always have them, but they’ve not. You understand, if you’re bringing
down the population there’s no better vector than spreading disease by biting
insects. They’ve got little needles, just like a little needle in their proboscis
and it sticks right through into the vein or an artery or arterial and it will
get the stuff right in there— it’s wonderful for spreading disease, and they’re
going to use it down the road, you know, if not already.

And,
another one too is called…

Integrating federal research on
global change and climate change

(A: And it says...)

The U.S. Global Change Research
Program National Coordination Office

(A:
Do you understand, you have so many thousands of these organizations working 24
hours a day and they’ve been working for years and years and years to bring in
their big system? And you go and vote for a guy that’s sold to you by the
television, like you’re selling a product when you sell a president, you
see. And you think they’re going to change anything? They’re all on
board with it; that’s why they put them in. So...)

U.S. Global Change Research Program
National Coordination Office (USGCRP NCO) works to support the various programs
and initiatives for USGCRP through a team of dedicated professionals

(A:
Who are awfully highly paid...)

with expertise in administration,
coordination, planning, writing, and climate and environmental policy.

A:
I’ll put this up tonight. It’s got the USGCRP NCO Staff, for those who
didn’t know about it and it’s got all their names here, a whole bunch of them,
and what they’re up to and all the rest of it. There’s just so much you
just can’t keep up; there’s thousands of them, remember. The world’s not
run by peoples and democracies voting. I hope you realize; I hope you’re getting the message.

Now the
TSA, of course, with their groping, etcetera, had to come to this…

An expert in the fight against
child sexual abuse is raising the alarm about a technique the TSA is reportedly
using to get children to co-operate with airport pat-downs: calling it a
“game”.

Ken Wooden, founder of Child Lures
Prevention, says the TSA’s recommendation that children be told the pat-down is
a “game” is potentially putting children in danger.

Telling a child that they are
engaging in a game is “one of the most common ways” that sexual predators use
to convince children to engage in inappropriate contact, Wooden told Raw Story.

Children “don’t have the
sophistication” to distinguish between a pat-down carried out by an airport
security officer and an assault by a sexual predator, he said.

The TSA policy could “desensitize
children to inappropriate touch and ultimately make it easier for sexual
offenders to prey on our children,” Wooden added.

A:
So, I think it’s all intentional (of course it is); it’s training them that
you’re only a minutiae in the great big scheme of things.

Back with
more after this...

Hi folks,
I’m back Cutting Through the Matrix, and my satellite feed just went out there,
but that’s ok, I can keep going.

And, this
article here I’m reading right now is about the TSA pat-downs. Now listen, as I
say, they’re told to tell the children that they’re playing games. “It’s
just a game, children.” You understand, that’s how the elite talk to you
as well? “It’s just a game, children,” you know. And it says…

Addressing the controversy over
pat-downs of children last month, TSA regional security director James Marchand
told the press the TSA was working on new practices to make children more
comfortable during the pat-down process.

(A:
As you’re being conditioned that you’re helpless, you see.)

“You try to make it as best you can
for that child to come through. If you can come up with some kind of a game to
play with a child, it makes it a lot easier,” said Marchand....

(A:
Well, that’s how they do it with us. It makes it a lot easier— "it’s just
a game," you know. That’s what the media does to you— it’s a game.

Wooden, who has testified before
Congress on child safety issues on numerous occasions, says he was told by a
TSA agent that the practice has been used.

A: Of
course it’s used. So, that’s training the children and they’ll grow up
thinking it’s all quite normal. Actually, by the time they grow up it
probably will be normal even amongst themselves because now you have just
orgies everywhere. Even the royalty’s all into it, as you saw last week,
but that’s the new normal, isn’t it. Destruction of the family unit...
your body doesn’t belong just to you and you must share it with others.
You see, they’ve got it all worked out at the top, so there’ll be no hassle in
the future as we go through, as the old ones die off, the old types die off—
Mark 5 or 6 is going to die off and Mark 7 will take over, you see. And
that’s really how it’s done.

Also
tonight too I want to put up…

The History Of DHS Ammunition Purchases

A: And this
is a good one because this site’s got it really all listed here going back over
the last few years; the biggest purchases have been since Obama has been
in— well over 50 percent more since he’s been in office but it doesn’t mean
he’s doing it because he’s just a little front man too. But it’s just fantastic
the kind of ammo they’re buying in, because, you see, they know there’s big
troubles down the road as you refuse to give up your tap water to an
international agency and you’re forced into austerity and maybe even
rationing. They really, really want to bring rationing in, because
they’ve actually said that, if they could only get into the rationing, like
World War II, people would understand, it’s a kind of war situation, we’ve got
a big thing to fight and we’ll all accept poverty and obedience to the government.
So, it’s all working pretty, pretty good, you know.

Also too,
it’s an old article, it was done in 1997-98; I mentioned it before and it says…

GLOBAL WARMING IS TOO SERIOUS TO BE
LEFT TO THE POLITICIANS.

(A:
For those who don’t believe it’s happening...)

HEREWITH A SCIENTIFIC SOLUTION TO
THE PROBLEM. (IF THERE IS A PROBLEM, THAT IS.)

A:
And that is basically a ‘Sunscreen for Planet Earth’— a sunscreen for planet
earth...they were talking about that way back and they talked about all the
different stuff, particles they’d put in the air. Mind you, this stuff
too that’s supposed to reflect light back out, you see, like tiny little
mirrors, it’s not as accurate as they say. It also traps the heat that
comes to the earth and it reflects back out and it goes back and forth like a
tennis ball between the earth and all these particles and the heat builds up
(as those who have got a brain still functioning have noticed), even in these
last few days, for instance. But they’re doing it anyway. And they
know also as well because they’ve got constant records, constant updates, on
all the medical problems daily across the world with the internet and so
on, in medical files. They know the cull-off rate too from different
people who can’t tolerate it as well as others; you’ll all get sick with it
eventually, but certain ones will get sicker quicker. And that’s the real
world, folks—that’s the real world. But don’t worry— go vote. Go
vote and get played again like a sucker.

From Hamish
and myself from Ontario Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God, or your Gods,
go with you.