QUESTIONS?

ByRegulatory News

July 18, 2018

ESMA published supplementary guidance on the application of the endorsement regime for non-EU credit ratings under the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation (CRAR). To ensure that third-country credit ratings, which are endorsed for use by EU investors, meet requirements that are at least "as stringent as" those set out in CRAR, ESMA added a new section to its Guidelines on Endorsement, which were first published in November 2017. The guidelines will enter into force on January 01, 2019.

The new section aims to assist EU CRAs in assessing whether a third-country CRA’s internal requirements meet the "as stringent as" test. This is done by setting out the general principles underpinning the "as stringent as" test and providing a non-exhaustive list of alternative internal requirements, which ESMA considers to pass the test. The identified alternative requirements relate to fees charged by CRAs, analyst rotation, pre-publication of issuer notification, certain rating disclosures (transparency report, initial reviews, and preliminary ratings), and the treatment of inside information. These supplementary guidelines will ensure an effective application of the 2013 amendments to CRAR (CRA3) for endorsed credit ratings and a high level of protection of European investors who use endorsed credit ratings for regulatory purposes.

In 2017, ESMA had clarified that there are two ways for an EU CRA to ensure that an endorsed credit rating issued by a third-country CRA meets the "as stringent as" test. The EU CRA has verified, and is able to demonstrate that, either:

the conduct of the third-country CRA fulfills the relevant endorsement provisions of CRAR; or

the third-country CRA has established and adheres to alternative internal requirements, which are at least as stringent as the relevant endorsement provisions of CRAR.

European Parliament published a report that provides a concise overview of the Dodd-Frank Act, the challenges of its implementation, and efforts to roll back the Act, in large part due to what are viewed to be vague and impractical provisions.