Indian Man Beaten to Death by Nieces Near Delhi – Thousands of Women Riot Demanding Better Protection for Men

A man was beaten to death by his three nieces over a land dispute in Bihar, police said Saturday.
Harihar Choudhary, a resident of Bhatwalia village in Gopalganj district, was beaten to death by his three nieces while he was ploughing the field Friday, police officer Anand Kumar Pandey said.

“Choudhary’s nieces told him not to plough. But when he refused, they attacked him with bamboo sticks and beat him to death,” he said.

Of course, I made up the part in the title suggesting that thousands of women were marching in the streets protesting against a man being brutally murdered. Some hope.

I don’t want anyone to think I am in bad taste for drawing this analogy with the recent appalling and beyond evil gang rape and murder of the young Indian student on a bus, but it needs to be drawn and a couple of points made.

Men are violently beaten, murdered, burnt alive, skinned alive, on a literally daily basis in these Third World shit holes. But of course, no one gives a f***, because they are men, even when it is women doing the killing.

There will be no women marching to demand an end to this.

And notice the media concentrate on the fact that she was raped, not the fact that she was beaten into a coma, and subsequent death, with iron bars. The media would like you to think that it was the rape itself that was responsible for her massive internal injuries causing her death. Very unlikely. Being repeatedly smashed with heavy iron bars by multiple assailants and then thrown out of the moving bus is a far more likely cause.

And, of course, if rape is worse than death, as most feminists claim, then we should be thankful that she did die. In that case, I wonder why the men now face the death penalty for murder, and not for the original rape?

Of course the Sexual Trade Union won’t miss a beat in exploiting this tragic and appalling case to make yet more misandrist anti-sex laws that protect their own sexual asking price. India already far outshines even the eUSSR in this regard – recently, the age of consent was raised to 18, with massively draconian punishments for even the slightest transgression. Despite this, as a knee-jerk reaction to the rape of the student, India now wants to reduce the age of criminal responsibilty in rape cases from 18 to 15. Talk about having your cake and eating it (http://www.indiatvnews.com/crime/news/congress-anti-rape-draft-bill-proposes-years-jail-2276.html).

I guess the question going through my mind right now is: what is the most misandric country on earth? Despite the many laws (and rather draconian punishments meted out) in the US that favor women over men, and a pop culture that does far more mocking and demonization of men than worship of them, for whatever reason (usually the protection of “innocent until proven guilty” in US CRIMINAL law, meaning its kind of harder to be convicted of something like rape) the US is not usually considered the most misandric. Across the manosphere I usually hear three countries mentioned as the “worst”.
A. Canada
B. Sweden / The Scandanavian countries in general
C. India

Canada and the Scandanavian countries: the argument seems to be that they are the most misandric because of the ease with which one can be convicted of certain types of assaults against women, the fact that penalties for such things tend to be higher than in other aspects of their criminal justice systems (thus showing a focus on demonizing crime against females) and the fact that their feminist movements have significant penetration of, and support by those in power. On the other hand, these are “rehabilitation” style societies and punishments are, by US standards , pretty damn light.
India: Whilst one can actually find LAWS and cultural things in India that actually DO disadvantage women, there is a hell of a lot of legislation and culture that demonizes males explicitly. You have “women only” trains, for instance. You have their draconian and easily abused domestic violence laws. You have a mass feminist movement along with tons of asian style “chivalry” that has led to these demonstrations. In the US the feminists and some of the socon’s joined forces at various times, mostly to attack male sexuality. India seems to be on that kind of thing on steroids over the past 5 to ten years.

Lastly, there are a few countries I left out like Great Britain and Australia or New Zealand. Like the US , these countries, for whatever reason, don’t often get the “most misandric” label considered by most in the manosphere and I wonder why not?

Anyway, are there any thoughts here as to what really is the worst country (or series of countries like Scandanavia) for men?

Clarence:
I think that those three countries you’ve mentioned get more attention because feminism is actually on the defensive there. Fidelbogen has been writing that the MRM in India has far more power than the Anglosphere. The Assange and Berge cases have weakened feminism in Scandanavia; and there’s been a lot of MRM activity in Canada recently such as the protests which turned violent in Vancouver and Toronto.

As far as the Anglosphere goes, the misandry is so deeply entrenched it’s arguable as to whether Australia, Britain, or the US is actually worse. Maybe the reason is on these other countries is because they have a possibly of improving? The Anglosphere is more or less a lost cause.

Of course the Sexual Trade Union won’t miss a beat in exploiting this tragic and appalling case to make yet more misandrist anti-sex laws that protect their own sexual asking price.

some journalist whose name I forget once called this “desk drawer legislation”.

When as a politician you have laws in your drawer that you know are too drastic and draconian to be passed under “normal” circumstances. So you wait for your chance, in the shape of a catastrophic current event, to pull them out of your hat and in the headless confusion that surrounds that event you hope that the hysteria will be great enough that nobody will really question the wisdom of your piece of draft legislation.

Just think of all the post-9/11 hysteria and all the encroachments on basic civilian freedoms that followed the attacks. Those who pushed for all the “anti-terrorism” legislation that was enacted around the globe had had all of it in their drawers for years but knew the time had not yet come. It was even admitted in accompanying strategy papers within U.S. government circles that it would take a cataclysmic event to push these measures through, and that they would most likely never find any support whatsoever in the absence of such an event.

And it’s the same with many anti-sex law that have been handed down in the past 10 or 15 years. The more outrageous the crime, the more hysterical and mindless the response. Well, again, only seemingly mindless, because those propagating the responses know full well what they are doing.

And it’s the same with many anti-sex law that have been handed down in the past 10 or 15 years. The more outrageous the crime, the more hysterical and mindless the response. Well, again, only seemingly mindless, because those propagating the responses know full well what they are doing.

With New Labour in the UK, it was chilling the obvious manner in which the government manipulated tragic crimes and killings of little girls in order to announce ‘we’re getting tough on paedophiles’.

As we know, most of these laws stem from the EU and other intergovernmental treaties. Yet we repeatedly had the government announcing a new sex law (that had already been agreed upon) the very day or two after a tragic child murder or such like. In other words, they deliberately waited for an outrageous sex crime before they announced the new law in order to win votes for ‘cracking down’ on paedos – ususally pretending that it was their own initiative decided in the wake of the tragedy, without even mentioning the EU directive that had already mandated it.

According to our good friend Chris Brand, there may have been a religious motive involved as well :

As a 23-year old medical student died from being raped for an hour by six men on a bus in Delhi (Sun, 30 xii), no details were provided to or by MSM as to the attackers’ ethnicity; but the fact that the girl had been sent for treatment in Singapore not for medical reasons but on orders from the highest government circles suggested that Indian authorities had wished to defuse ethnic tension (e.g. between Hindus and Muslims) by suppressing the most basic facts of the case.

Recent Comments

Dave { It's depressing to think - as a late 20's male - I'm already out of the running for college age girls, nevermind prime high school ones. Things don't get better with age for men; they only get worse. You get more money and status, but lose what matters most to young females: looks. I remember doing a temp job recently.... } – Nov 27, 7:56 PM

detiso { You should write more articles on peak female beauty. I share many views with you, so it's interesting to read. I find it odd how today most men are ridiculed for admitting their attraction to underage post-pubescent females. } – Nov 25, 7:32 PM

theantifeminist { @Frenchman - haha, shame aspies are unable to recognize irony, nor the valid pointing out of double standards when exhibited by the enemy. David Futrelle accused me of being a paedophile for saying that paedohysteria was a men's rights issue when he himself had a long track record of saying far more extreme things than anything I've championed here. I... } – Nov 22, 7:25 PM

Frenchman { Are not you the guy who are famous for saying that it's okay to bang 15yo old girls? Is it a men's right issue when you want? Is it paedophilia and child rape now when it suits you and not for me? This blog is made clearly by a schizoid men and probable an assberger, his insistenced on calling "aspie"... } – Nov 22, 6:25 PM

theantifeminist { If a 5 year old can not fuck, why would they allow it with a 15? both are minors, there is no legal difference at all, there is no legal difference in one of 5 and one of 15, for law and society we are a bunch of child rapist because a minor is a legal child by definition, and... } – Nov 21, 9:45 AM

theantifeminist { It is a fair analogy, because at the time of the first KKK if a black man had sexual relations with a white woman it was considered that the black had raped her, since it was inconceivable for the society that a white had a voluntary relationship with a black. Exactly like a man with a girl now. No, it's... } – Nov 21, 9:40 AM

Feldmarschall { One more thing , you say: "Do you think 5 year olds should be able to vote?" If a 5 year old can not fuck, why would they allow it with a 15? both are minors, there is no legal difference at all, there is no legal difference in one of 5 and one of 15, for law and society... } – Nov 18, 1:25 PM

Feldmarschall { It is a fair analogy, because at the time of the first KKK if a black man had sexual relations with a white woman it was considered that the black had raped her, since it was inconceivable for the society that a white had a voluntary relationship with a black. Exactly like a man with a girl now. Adolescents are... } – Nov 18, 11:40 AM

theantifeminist { I do not know what kind of girls you have known, must have been very pretty, but like most, infantilized by society, however they are not dumb, I instead in these “adolescents” I have found the most intelligent and mature people I known, however I really believe that adults are not enough prepared to vote (not even to dropping their... } – Nov 17, 10:08 PM

theantifeminist { Well, you will go to jail if you have sex with an underage girl. Also, 'jailbait' is probably the only linguistic foothold on reality left after the feminist manipulation of language that has allowed them to virtually control the entire narrative on teen sex (17 year old 'children' who only 'paedophiles' find attractive etc.) a 50’s gay would never use... } – Nov 17, 9:53 PM

Feldmarschall { IMHO 'jailbait' is probably the most aspie concept ever used and nobody noticed except me. I do not understand how WE have been able to assimilate that it a 'crime' what nature commands us, I do not want to offend anyone, but a 50's gay would never use a such type of term nor a black in the Apartheid neither... } – Nov 16, 2:23 PM

RippedOfInTrade { If there is no need for something like this, then why do you want to ban it? Checkmate, the market regulates everything } – Nov 14, 9:04 AM

Dave { Where's my jailbait dammit? >:( Where's my cute braces-wearing teeeeeeeeeeeeen ? :,( Hell, I'd be happy with a slim, age-matched 20-something at this point, but I can't even get that. Guess I have to wait until my generation of women is in their 30's and off the Chad carousel. Or are they waiting until their 40's nowadays? } – Nov 14, 2:00 AM

theantifeminist { @AnotherMan - why? As far as I know, Trump hasn't ever said anything about 'paedophiles'. As far as I know, he hasn't apologized for telling underage girls that they were pretty or he would be dating them soon either. Most paedocrites don't openly (in the public eye and in front of cameras) tell jailbait that they are hot etc. } – Nov 12, 5:56 PM

AnotherMan { I seriously believe that Donald Trump believes that a man who have sex with a underage girl is a paedophile and have underage sex is a criminal act just like feminists thing. } – Nov 09, 4:07 PM

theantifeminist { A man who made money from running beauty contests, bragged to 14 year old girls that he would be dating them at 16, and was falsely accused of child rape is now President of the United States. And the cunt he defeated was one of the women most responsible for defining girls under 18 as children internationally and off limits... } – Nov 09, 8:56 AM

Anti-Feminist Books

"With young girls Nature seems to have had in view what, in the language of the drama, is called a striking effect; as for a few years she dowers them with a wealth of beauty and is lavish in her gift of charm, at the expense of all the rest of their life; so that during those years they may capture the fantasy of some man to such a degree that he is hurried away into undertaking the honorable care of them, in some form or other, as long as they live—a step for which there would not appear to be any sufficient warranty if reason only directed his thoughts. Accordingly, Nature has equipped woman, as she does all her creatures, with the weapons and implements requisite for the safeguarding of her existence, and for just as long as it is necessary for her to have them. Here, as elsewhere, Nature proceeds with her usual economy; for just as the female ant, after fecundation, loses her wings, which are then superfluous, nay, actually a danger to the business of breeding; so, after giving birth to one or two children, a woman generally loses her beauty; probably, indeed, for similar reasons."

Elizabeth Bathory was a 16th Century Hungarian Countess and probably the most prolific serial killer and child murderer in history. She is believed to have sadistically tortured and killed over 600 young adolescent girls through pure sexual jealousy and malice. Obsessed with her fading looks, she would spend hours staring at herself in the mirror before picking out the prettiest of her retinue of young teenage maid servants to be hung up in a gibbot. She would proceed to jab at the poor girl with a sharp lance, causing her to slowly and painfully bleed to death. All the time whilst doing this, Elizabeth would scream furious obscenitites at the dying child.

– United Nations ‘Special Rapporteur on child abuse’Claimed in 2009 that there are over 4 million child porn websites worldwide that constitute a multi-billion dollar industry. An FBI expert recently stated that there were now less than a dozen commerical child porn sites in existence. While millions of children around the world still live in poverty, and thousands die every day from famine, disease and war, her UN feminist mandate is to jet around the world organizing conferences to wipe out the scourge of 17 year old ’children’ choosing to do what they want with their bodies on webcam.