\documentclass[nocolor,memo]{j3}
\renewcommand{\hdate}{30 June 2005}
\renewcommand{\vers}{J3/05-210}
\usepackage{lineno}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{xr}
\externaldocument{007}
\input pdftest
\begin{document}
\vspace{-10pt}
\begin{tabbing}
Subject: \hspace*{0.25in}\=First draft of edits to allow POINTER function
results as actual arguments\\
From: \>Van Snyder\\
Reference: \>WG5/N1626-UK-007\\
\end{tabbing}
\pagewiselinenumbers
\leftlinenumbers
\linenumbers*
\edits{04-007}
\sep\mgpar{269:21,22+}[Editor: About $\frac13$ through {\secfont 12.4.1.2
Actual arguments associated with dummy data objects}, within the first
paragraph that begins ``Except in references to intrinsic\dots,'' replace
``is a pointer'' by ``has the pointer attribute''.]
\section{Optional additional edit}
\sep\mgpar{269:22+}[Immediately after the above described paragraph,
insert the following note:]
\begin{xnote}{12.21$\frac12$}
If the actual argument is a reference to a function for which the result has
the POINTER attribute, the result shall be pointer associated with a target,
and the dummy argument becomes argument associated with that target.
\end{xnote}
\section{Alternative edits}
Don't do anything other than reversing the outcome of Interp 000074, which
failed the WG5 letter ballot.
\label{lastpage}
\end{document}