This list is kind of jacked up. If your going to look at the belt holders only, shouldn't it be the guy who has held it with the most defenses on top? To ignore the P4P guys and the guy who has the most consecutive title defenses makes the list a contradiction. You should of just did a P4P list then. Good concept, bad execution.

There are some "P4P" guys in there. As to most defenses, I made a note of why John isn't there. When was the last time he faced a genuine top contender?