Are these people so ignorant of truth they do not realize the Constitution is what allows them to vent their grievances? Yes, folks were not always treated with respect, but those days are long gone, get over it already! What good would bloodshed do? None, it might start a bigger fight, is this the real goal, a race war? The entire article shared so folks don’t have to hunt for it.

Black student group vows bloodshed over Constitution

A well-established black student coalition is calling for violence if the U.S. Constitution is not replaced with a version that serves “the interests of black people.”

Afrikan Black Coalition was created in 2003 to connect activists across the University of California system. It has gone from concentrating on the low admittance and retention rates of black students in California to developing leadership and communication skills for members.

The group posted an op-ed, “A New Constitution or the Bullet,” Nov. 4 against a backdrop of racial tension at campuses across the U.S.

“I have come to realize that the Constitution is the root of virtually all our problems in America. In order to understand the injustices against Black folks in United States, we must look back to its foundation. The U.S. is a country that was founded on slavery, genocide, rape, and white-male patriarchy,” the group wrote. “A body cannot be separated from its head and remain living. The Constitution and all the evil that it allows to be perpetuated are the head of White America, or more so corrupt America. Racist America. … A Constitution written by only white men will never serve the interests of black people. The Constitution was written for the ruling class of white men which constructed whiteness to be more valuable than any other race.”

Author “Brother B” then called for bloodshed if the group’s demands were not met.

“Do we not have the right to abolish the laws that oppress us? It is time to claim the Declaration of Independence and apply it to our struggle as colonized black people in America. The United States has us; it is time we demand a new constitution or tell America that she will get the bullet. White supremacy’s bullets are killing black people every day. If America does not protect us, then it is our human right to defend ourselves by any means necessary. It is our human right to overthrow a government that has been destructive to our people. This is why we must rise up and let all people come together and write new constitution to serve ALL people. … We must pick up where the Black Panthers left off and declare a new constitution or it will be the bullet,” the activist wrote.

Education Watchdog Campus Reform reached out to Afrikan Black Coalition for comment on the article, but did not receive a reply.

The nonprofit organization pointed out that taxpayer-funded institutions like UC Santa Barbara, UC Irvine, UC Riverside, and San Diego State University all have given the Afrikan Black Coalition real estate on their websites.

The Afrikan Black Coalition’s current executive director, Salih Muhammad, is a native of Oakland, California. He graduated in 2009 from the Muhammad University of Islam in Chicago, Illinois. Muhammad also attended UC Berkeley and chaired its Black Student Union. He now teaches high school in Oakland.

The Afrikan Black Coalition bills its annual conference as “the largest Black Student conference in California.”

The Afrikan Black Coalition is not alone in calling for changes anathema to the principles enshrined in 1776′s Declaration of Independence and codified into law when the U.S. Constitution was ratified (by all states except Rhode Island and North Carolina) in 1788.

A collection of students from 115 colleges planned a national walkout on Thursday to promote “free” college education as a right, WND reported.

The “Million Student March” was organized on Facebook and scheduled for 3 p.m. EST.

“The United States is the richest country in the world, yet students have to take on crippling debt in order to get a college education. We need change and change starts in the streets when people demand it,” the coalition’s Facebook page said.

Former adviser to President George W.H. Bush, Mark Serrano, asked Fox Business during an air-on interview Wednesday where the students’ logic will take them.

“Where’s the limit? If you think about it, why stop at college loans? Why don’t we give a car to every student, a new car,” said Serrano. “Maybe we can pay for their clothes. You know, every dorm room should have a case of toilet paper. Maybe we should just break the bank and give them everything we need.”

The only thing that gets a progressive’s juices flowing as much as global warming would be the situation in Israel with the Palestinians. They have those barges supposedly loaded with food but carrying guns and rockets. This is all done in the name of humanity. More like control of humanity. Having to put labels on things simply tells their EU minions what not to buy!

EU Orders Special Label on Israeli Imports

In a stinging rebuke to Israel, the European Union insisted on Wednesday that some goods produced on land seized in the 1967 war must be labeled “made in settlements,” a mandate that added to Israel’s deep unease over a growing international boycott.

European officials tried to play down the decision, saying the guidelines merely clarified existing rules. But the move exacerbated already simmering tensions between Israel and Europe as Israeli politicians condemned it as an echo of the Holocaust-era branding of European Jews and their storefronts with yellow stars.

The European Union is Israel’s top trading partner, though products from the occupied West Bank, the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem that will now require special labels amount to less than 1 percent of Israel’s $13 billion in annual exports to the bloc’s 28 countries. But while the immediate economic impact is expected to be minimal, there is fear that the logic behind the labeling could be extended to the broader economy by targeting businesses that have operations or affiliates in the contested areas, as many do.…The labeling rules apply to fresh fruit and vegetables, wine, honey, olive oil, eggs, poultry, organic products and cosmetics coming from Israeli-owned businesses and farms outside the state’s original borders.

Rather than “product of Israel,” these goods must be labeled with the term “settlement,” or “its equivalent,” the rules say, as in “product of West Bank (Israeli settlement).” Goods from Palestinian-owned businesses can say “product of Palestine” or “product of West Bank (Palestinian product).”

It is hard to ascribe any reason to this action beyond garden variety anti-Semitism, both by the EU bureaucrats and the people who desire the labels so that they may be boycotted.

Michael Oren, a former Israeli ambassador to the United States and now a member of parliament, said plainly that the E.U. decision “is anti-Semitic.”

“There are dozens of border disputes and ‘occupations’ in the world, but the E.U. decided to single out Israel,” Oren told the Jerusalem Post last week. “They are not labeling products from China, India or Turkey — only Israel.”

Science Minister Ofir Akunis called the initiative “a dark stain on the moral fabric of Europe, which bears witness to the fact that the lessons of history have not been learned.” He said the labels would “encourage terrorism.”

Also missing from the list is Crimea and the areas Ukraine being extracted by Putin. Naturally, when given the choice between doing the right thing or stabbing an ally in the back, the Obama administration always votes for the backstab:

The Obama administration — and many members of Congress — oppose boycotts against Israel. But the White House position on the European label rules was less clear.

“We oppose efforts to isolate or delegitimize the state of Israel,” State Department deputy spokesman Mark Toner said Wednesday, declining to define the European move as a boycott.

Toner also repeated the long-standing U.S. position that “settlements are illegitimate, and they’re harmful to prospects for peace and to Israel’s long-term security.”

Why Europe, at this juncture in history, would choose to support a terrorist regime that serves no larger purpose in Gaza and the West Bank than indoctrinating another generation of Arab children with anti-Semitism over a reliable military, economic, and political partner is only a mystery if you look beyond religious animus. Otherwise, it is easily explained.

No word yet on what this label will look like, but a quick search of Google gives a lot of good ideas.

U.S. carries out Syria strike targeting ‘Jihadi John’

WASHINGTONThe U.S. military has carried out an air strike in Syria targeting Mohammed Emwazi, the Islamic State militant known as “Jihadi John” who participated in gruesome videos showing the killings of Western hostages, a U.S. official said on Thursday.

The United States was still assessing the effectiveness of the strike, which took place around the city of Raqqa, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

This article brings up all sorts of terrible thoughts of retribution or retaliation, not by the citizens living there, nor the Muslim invaders, but by the federal government. Since the current president and Hillary Clinton both want to take guns away, who would protect them? One could write potential nightmares all day long, what can be done? How exactly does any town or city protect itself? Forget about the regular illegal aliens, what about the legal invaders?

One U.S. state draws line in sand against Islamization

A third South Carolina county has barred the door to any Third World refugees being resettled in their community and at least two others are considering the same move.

The Berkeley County Council unanimously passed a resolution Monday that bars any refugee funds from flowing into that county.

The resolution calls for “all South Carolina public officials to immediately cease and desist” from helping to resettle Middle Eastern refugees anywhere in the state until the legislature can act on the issue and pass legislation reflecting the will of the people.

Anderson and Pickens counties already passed similar resolutions.

Two more counties – Greenville and York – are expected to vote soon on similar resolutions.

South Carolina is the only state that gives local governments the option of rejecting, not necessarily the refugees, but the state and federal tax dollars that flow to their aid when they are resettled in a city.

The U.S. takes in 70,000 refugees per year for many years and President Obama has said he will up that to 85,000 in fiscal 2016 and 100,000 in 2017. These refugees are hand-selected by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres. The majority come from Muslim populations in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, Burma, Democratic Republic of Congo and Somalia although others include Hindus from Bhutan and a small number of Christians and Buddhists.

Obama’s Syrian refugees have proven most controversial, because of the presence of a large jihadist army in that country affiliated with the Islamic State, al-Nusra Front and al-Qaida. He has agreed to accept at least 10,000 Syrians for permanent resettlement in more than 180 U.S. cities and towns in fiscal 2016, with the promise of many more in 2017.

(CNSNews.com) – Not a single member of the Senate spoke out last week against a provision in the defense authorization bill that will repeal the military’s ban on sodomy and bestiality if the bill becomes law.