Comments on: A spinning black hole at a galaxy’s centerhttp://www.kurzweilai.net/a-spinning-black-hole-at-a-galaxys-center
Accelerating IntelligenceSun, 02 Aug 2015 21:49:58 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1By: Bobhttp://www.kurzweilai.net/a-spinning-black-hole-at-a-galaxys-center/comment-page-1#comment-36586
BobSun, 30 Sep 2012 23:54:00 +0000http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=165426#comment-36586For those of us who are not astrophysics PhD could you actually give use the size in miles/kilometers of the radius. Saying 5.5 times the Schwartzchild radius is not particularly revealingFor those of us who are not astrophysics PhD could you actually give use the size in miles/kilometers of the radius. Saying 5.5 times the Schwartzchild radius is not particularly revealing
]]>By: Marcos Marinhttp://www.kurzweilai.net/a-spinning-black-hole-at-a-galaxys-center/comment-page-1#comment-36017
Marcos MarinFri, 28 Sep 2012 22:52:59 +0000http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=165426#comment-36017wow! I'm surprised to find someone else here who resists the sophisms "floating" around. But wait, don't disappoint me already, remember this is a very big thing, they have no idea, or don't tell, what's going on there. Mass is meaningless to conclude what you did, think of charges inside a closed surface.wow! I’m surprised to find someone else here who resists the sophisms “floating” around. But wait, don’t disappoint me already, remember this is a very big thing, they have no idea, or don’t tell, what’s going on there. Mass is meaningless to conclude what you did, think of charges inside a closed surface.
]]>By: Mortranhttp://www.kurzweilai.net/a-spinning-black-hole-at-a-galaxys-center/comment-page-1#comment-35922
MortranFri, 28 Sep 2012 17:41:59 +0000http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=165426#comment-35922Impressive. This is the first solid research about the topic of Black Holes, since it is finally based on observation instead of speculations. I have always been skeptical about the existence of Black Holes, but if they can also determine the mass of the Black Hole in the center of M87 independently from the measurement of the event horizon, then there can be no doubt anymore.Impressive. This is the first solid research about the topic of Black Holes, since it is finally based on observation instead of speculations. I have always been skeptical about the existence of Black Holes, but if they can also determine the mass of the Black Hole in the center of M87 independently from the measurement of the event horizon, then there can be no doubt anymore.
]]>By: Marcos Marinhttp://www.kurzweilai.net/a-spinning-black-hole-at-a-galaxys-center/comment-page-1#comment-35886
Marcos MarinFri, 28 Sep 2012 15:56:47 +0000http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=165426#comment-35886Why?! Einstein was an idiot! If you are perspicacious enough to carry his block world all the way to ultimate logical entailment you'd be surprised to see a duality of the soul conclusion! Quite fitting for one who alludes to the heavenly lack of a Vegas but hardly to any self-respecting scientist, specially nowadays. Descartes would certainly be proud though. :-DWhy?! Einstein was an idiot! If you are perspicacious enough to carry his block world all the way to ultimate logical entailment you’d be surprised to see a duality of the soul conclusion! Quite fitting for one who alludes to the heavenly lack of a Vegas but hardly to any self-respecting scientist, specially nowadays. Descartes would certainly be proud though. :-D
]]>By: your namehttp://www.kurzweilai.net/a-spinning-black-hole-at-a-galaxys-center/comment-page-1#comment-35882
your nameFri, 28 Sep 2012 15:39:19 +0000http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=165426#comment-35882Rodavure - what does that mean then...from a quantum physics pov, what else could be suggested here? I'm not a scientist, but this is just fascinating. tksRodavure – what does that mean then…from a quantum physics pov, what else could be suggested here? I’m not a scientist, but this is just fascinating. tks
]]>By: Rodavurehttp://www.kurzweilai.net/a-spinning-black-hole-at-a-galaxys-center/comment-page-1#comment-35826
RodavureFri, 28 Sep 2012 13:33:53 +0000http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=165426#comment-35826Wow, that's some hard hitting research. I'm all for Einstein being right about general relativity, but unless some radically new data is presented by this continued study I do not see it clicking with quantum physics. Gravity is just too weak on those scales.Wow, that’s some hard hitting research. I’m all for Einstein being right about general relativity, but unless some radically new data is presented by this continued study I do not see it clicking with quantum physics. Gravity is just too weak on those scales.
]]>