It's "dedicated to exposing the falsehoods and to revealing facts abut the complete destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rises on September 11, 2001."

It substitutes "scientific facts and forensic evidence" for "misinformation and disinformation."

It "educat(es) and motivat(es) thousands of architects and engineers as well as the public at large."

It aims for "mainstream media coverage" of the Big Lie of our time.

It calls for "a truly open and independent investigationâ€¦in the pursuit of justice."

On September 11, 2010, AE911Truth founder Richard Gage said:

"The people of New York need to see the light - that a third WTC skyscraper not hit by any plane was destroyed on September 11th."

"They have been deceived about what happened on that terrible day."

"We are shining the spotlight, literally, on the fact that the official story of what happened at Ground Zero simply cannot be true and that a truly independent new investigation is needed both as a matter of national security and as the key to justice for the victims of the Twin Towers."

Other uploads got more. Early viewing totaled over 250,000 people. Google and YouTube pulled the plug.

Their search engines failed to locate the above videos. Doing so shows their complicity in suppressing vital truths everyone needs to know.

Woodworth's article is important. It needs to be carefully read. It needs to be passed on to others. Everyone needs to know. 9/11 truth is vital.

Woodworth was clear and unequivocal saying:

Her "essay is offered to all citizens who believe the government should be investigated when state crimes against democracy are suspected."

"It is further offered to all who pay taxes for government care, protection, and the guarantee of constitutional freedoms - and in particular to citizens who may have encountered chilling indications of covert state interference in their lives."

Woodworth is involved in a separate initiative. It's called Consensus 9/11. It's extremely important. It seeks compelling truths. It dispels official lies.

It does so through "best evidence" proof. It does it because it matters. It publishes regular updates. It's compiled overwhelming 9/11 truths too important to ignore.

Exposing the Big Lie of our time is vital. ReThink911 is involved. It's a public awareness campaign.

On September 1, AE911Truth launched it. A coalition of organizations support it.

It aims to raise "public awareness by introducing viewers to the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 and informing the public that over 2,000 architects and engineers have signed a petition calling for a new investigation into the destruction of Building 7 and the Twin Towers."

In September, it ran ads or billboards in major US, Canadian, UK and Australian cities.

They included New York, Washington, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Dallas, Toronto, Ottawa, Vancouver, London and Sydney.

"Did you know a 3rd tower fell on 9/11," they asked? Enough funds were raised to maintain a 54-foot-tall billboard at 47th St. and 7th Ave. in New York's Time Square.

On October 8, Global Research headlined "Rethink911: Confront the Lies of the Mainstream Media."

"Over the next five days," ReThink911 supporters worldwide will flood five major New York newspapers with a tsunami of emails.

They include The New York Times, the Daily News, the New York Post, Village Voice and Newsday.

"Join this media blitz campaignâ€¦" Tell New York major print media publications there's been "a giant ReThink911 billboard in Times Square since September 3rd."

It's too important to ignore. Only half the US public know about WTC Building 7's collapse. Major media ignore this and other vital 9/11 truths.

ReThink911 and other organizations want them revealed. Growing support can help do so. It's vital. Email The New York times at:

Many many many activists have exposed the likely infiltrator, disrupter and destroyer of justice efforts, James Fetzer.

Discrediting By Association: Undermining the Case for Patriots Who Question 9/11 Jim Fetzer is the primary force behind publicity and press releases for the claims of Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds, advocating endless investigation into every possible scenario imaginable. http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/patriots_question/

"'I used to think that the very idea of faking 'live' broadcasts was at least faintly absurd,' observed James Fetzer, the society's founder. 'But it turns out that there is a delay between an event's actual occurrence and the broadcasting of footage of that same event, which creates the opportunity for image manipulation. . . . a group long convinced of video fakery, including Gerard Holmgren, Rosalee Grable, StillDiggin, Killtown, and others, who have been frustrated their arguments have not been taken seriously. 'For that reason, I'm including this subject [TV Fakery] in a conference on The Science and the Politics of 9/11: What's Controversial, What's Not . . '" Mounting Evidence of 9/11 Video Fakery: New proof of media duplicity, Scholars claim; by James Fetzer; July 28, 2007 http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_james_fe_070726_mounting_evidience_o.htm

"'I've put them in their place so many times,' [Fetzer] says of his critics. And as he sees it, his long-running battles over Wellstone and JFK have helped to prepare him for his role as spokesman for the truth movement. 'I know a whole lot about how these games are played,' he says. 'When I come into this 9/11 thing, see, I am not just a formidable foe on my own. I have this wealth of experience. The others don't know diddly shit about disinformation. But, man, I've lived through it.'" Tumbling down the rabbit hole with professional philosopher Jim Fetzer; Mike Mosedale; June 28, 2006; Minneapolis/St. Paul 'City Pages,' http://www.citypages.com/databank/27/1334/article14475.asp

Jim Fetzer: "I must say I think we're finding out Judy, what happened on 9/11. I'm just blown away by your work. This is the most fascinating development in the history of the study of 9/11 ... I'm going to make a wild guess Judy; I'm going to presume that these [directed energy] beams had to be located in Building 7?"

ERROR: 'Nuclear Devices Were Used to Destroy the Twin Towers' In September, 2006, James Fetzer posted a series of articles on ScholarsFor911Truth.org suggesting that 'mini-nukes' were used to destroy the Twin Towers. Fetzer pitted Dr. Steven Jones' one article debunking the idea against six, implying that the idea had merit. http://911review.com/errors/wtc/nukes.html

Dissembling Websites Although the website ScholarsFor911Truth.org had the appearance of speaking for the members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, numbering more than 200, the site was actually controlled by James Fetzer. By November of 2006 Fetzer was openly attacking Steven Jones and heavily promoting ideas that nuclear weapons or space beams were used to destroy the Twin Towers. In December of 2006 a majority of the membership of voted to form a new group, Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, with the website STJ911.org. Fetzer began to migrate to several other domains including 911Scholars.org. http://www.911review.com/disinfo/sites.html#scholarsfor911truth

For years, "no Boeing" advocates such as A.K. Dewdney, Eric Hufschmid, David Griffin, Jim Fetzer, and the Loose Change filmmakers have used victim Mark Bingham as poster child for the fake calls claims by highlighting his use of his full name in addressing his mother. During his one call from Flight 93 to his mother, Bingham reportedly says "Hi Mom, this is Mark Bingham". Frequently overlooked in these accounts are the facts that Mark Bingham's mother has a different last name, that she herself relayed the excerpt, and that she has no doubt that the caller was her son. Furthermore, adducing as evidence of fakery perceived anomalies in the reported behavior of people in highly stressful life-threatening circumstances is unscientific at best. http://www.911review.com/errors/phantom/fake_calls.html