On 26/08/12 00:26, Arno Wagner wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:09:03AM +0200, Javier Juan Mart?nez Cabez?n wrote:
>> Do you want mean something like this?: if you want steganography please
>> just check linux/crypto/seed.c and try to figure the hidden message that
>> exists in this, so if you want to make your data hidden, make a crypto
>> driver.....
>>>>>> Sorry Sorry Sorry Sorry.... I couldn't resist it.
>> On the plus side, that would get rid (maybe) of all the people
> that do not understand the point of cryptsetup and want stego
> in there.
>> In the minus side it is not funny, but rather tragic. (Which
> in turn is funny ;-)
>>> Seriously, I do not want/need anything, but recent discussions
> make a reference section look like a good idea and several
> people proposed to have one. It also gives the FAQ a wider
> focus. At present it is basically 100% written by me and
> my view of things may have blind spots and a certain slant.
> With references, longer writings by others get a proper place
> and broaden what people are pointed to.
>> Arno
>>> 2012/8/25 Arno Wagner <arno at wagner.name>
>>>>>>>> If you want a "Humor" category, the references in it have to be
>>> 1. really funny 2. really relevant and 3. actually give insights.
>>> Example: http://xkcd.com/538/ (I think I will add that one myself.)
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> dm-crypt mailing list
>>dm-crypt at saout.de>>http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>>
When I tried to understand at first time crypto questions the first
source file I check was this, after that the RFC, after that I didn't
understood anything, just the two magic commentaries that still in my mind.
PD: All your afforts are really apreciated, just I ask you one thing,
please don't add my horrible english as a new high entropy algorithm
crypto driver :P