Hi all,
We've just been discussing changes to the occam-pi syntax. One of the
perpetual bugbears for parsing occam is inline VALOF blocks, and we're
considering doing away with them entirely (and thus simplifying the
FUNCTION syntax).
Has anybody:
- used inline VALOF in real code at all?
- found interesting uses for inline VALOF (that can't be obtained as
elegantly using named FUNCTIONs)?
Thanks,
--
Adam Sampson <http://offog.org/>