Senate overcomes filibuster, votes to open debate on gun bill

Share Update:

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

The U.S. Senate voted Thursday to overcome a Republican-led filibuster against tougher gun laws, clearing the way for a major congressional debate on a package of proposals sought by President Barack Obama in the aftermath of the Connecticut school massacre.

The procedural vote followed a breakthrough by Sens. Joe Manchin, D-West Virginia, and Pat Toomey, R-Pennsylvania, on broadening background checks to include private purchases at gun shows and on the Internet.

Because of the bipartisan deal, Senate Democrats proposing the legislation received support from enough Republicans to pass the cloture motion, 68-31, that sets up debate expected to last for two weeks.

However, the powerful gun lobby led by the National Rifle Association opposes the legislation and made clear it will seek political retribution on any legislator that supports it, including in Thursday’s vote on launching Senate debate.

Despite the agreement forged by Manchin and Toomey, both rated as strong supporters of gun rights by the NRA, the prospects for significant gun legislation to win congressional approval remained uncertain.

Any measure passed would then go to the Republican-led House, where GOP leaders have indicated resistance to the kind of proposals sought by Obama.

The NRA responded to the Manchin-Toomey compromise by saying it would fail to address the core issues of gun violence.

“Expanding background checks at gun shows will not prevent the next shooting, will not solve violent crime and will not keep our kids safe in schools,” it said in a statement.

In a letter sent to the Senate on Wednesday, the NRA’ s Chris Cox, who heads the group’s institute for legislative action, said the proposed package “would unfairly infringe upon the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding gun owners” and that the group “unequivocally opposed” it.

Cox’s letter called the compromise by Manchin and Toomey “misguided” and added that Thursday’s procedural vote would be included in its assessment of legislators unless a better alternative was proposed.

Meawnhile, a statement by more than 30 relatives of the 20 first graders and six educators killed in the Newtown shootings last December criticized senators for the filibuster of the gun package, saying they “should be ashamed of their attempt to silence efforts to prevent the next American tragedy.”

In an emotional scene Wednesday, Manchin choked up while meeting with some of the Newtown residents who praised him for political courage in taking on the NRA.

“You give me more legislative strength than you know,” Manchin said at one point. He later was unable to speak and reached for a tissue when asked by a reporter how the Newtown families affected his role in the negotiations with Toomey and others.

Following the Newtown shootings by a lone gunman, Obama called for a series of proposals including “universal” background checks on all gun purchases. Currently, the federal law requiring background checks covers licensed firearms dealers, with private sales excluded.

Fierce opposition by the NRA and its allies in Congress — mostly conservative Republicans but also some Democrats from gun-friendly states — made clear that the universal checks sought by Obama had no chance of passing, leading to efforts by Manchin, Toomey and others to work out a compromise.

In announcing the compromise, Manchin noted the proposal meant that firearms buyers at gun shows would face the same background check currently required in sales by federally licensed gun dealers. In addition, it would close a loophole that exempts intrastate gun sales on the Internet from requiring a background check, he said.

Addressing concerns of the NRA that expanding background checks would burden law-abiding gun owners seeking to trade or gift weapons in a personal transfer, Manchin declared that “personal transfers are not touched whatsoever.”

Another provision would recognize the legitimacy of concealed weapons permits across state lines.

The Manchin-Toomey compromise also would require states and the federal government to provide records on criminals and the “violently mentally ill” to the national background check system, addressing a criticism by the NRA and other opponents of gun laws that the existing system lacks substantive information.

In addition, the plan calls for a new National Commission on Mass Violence to report in six months on “all aspects of the problem, including guns, school safety, mental health, and violent media or video games.”

The NRA contends that an expanded background check system would create a paper trail that could eventually be used to build a national gun registry, which they reject as unconstitutional.

It also argues that an expanded system would prove a burden to law-abiding gun owners while doing nothing to stop criminals from getting hold of firearms.

According to a summary of the compromise proposal, it includes language that prohibits creation of a national gun registry or misusing information from background checks.

The NRA said rejection of the universal checks sought by Obama was “a positive development,” and it called for “serious and meaningful solutions” to gun violence instead of “blaming law-abiding gun owners for the acts of psychopathic murderers.”

Meanwhile, Obama said there were aspects of the Manchin-Toomey compromise that he would like to see strengthened.

“But the agreement does represent welcome and significant bipartisan progress. It recognizes that there are good people on both sides of this issue, and we don’t have to agree on everything to know that we’ve got to do something to stem the tide of gun violence,” the president said in a statement.

“Congress needs to finish the job,” Obama added, saying he would continue “asking the American people to stand up and raise their voices because these measures deserve a vote.”

Other reaction ranged from cautious support to angry rejection.

The Brady Campaign, named after the former White House press secretary wounded in an assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan, called the compromise a “good step forward,” while New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo described it as “better than nothing” but a sellout to the gun lobby.

“This is a Congress that is captive of the extremists and there is no clearer proof of that than this,” Cuomo said on the “Capitol Pressroom” radio show, adding that the compromise meant “we are not talking about a significant package of gun control anymore.”

Obama has made gun measures a major focus of his second-term agenda, holding events across the country to push for Congress to vote on the package.

However, the NRA’s strong opposition makes final approval uncertain, even with public support for tougher gun laws.

A new national survey showed that 86% of Americans support some expansion of background checks.

At the same time, the CNN/ORC International poll released Wednesday also showed a majority of respondents fear that increased background checks would lead to a federal registry of gun owners that could allow the government to take away legally owned weapons.

Failing to pass new gun laws would be a stinging defeat for Obama and Democrats.

However, a public perception that Republicans blocked popular proposals, such as expanding background checks, could harm GOP prospects in 2014 and 2016 among moderates they need in their corner to have any chance of countering strong support for Democrats by minority demographics such as Hispanic Americans, African Americans and the gay-lesbian vote.

The Senate Judiciary Committee passed a package of gun laws proposed by Obama after the Newtown attack by a lone gunman.

Proposals in the committee’s package included expanding background checks on gun buyers, toughening laws against gun trafficking and straw purchases, banning semiautomatic rifles modeled after military assault weapons as well as large-capacity ammunition magazines, and coming up with ideas for improving school safety.

The weapons ban, which would update a similar 1994 law that expired a decade later, already has been dropped, though Reid has promised a floor vote on it as an amendment to the package.

Some states already have passed stricter gun laws similar to the federal proposals since the Newtown shootings. They include Connecticut, where the killings occurred, and Colorado, the site of two other notorious mass shootings that contributed to a renewed gun debate in America.

The current background check system was created in 1989. It requires federally approved gun dealers to check whether gun buyers have a criminal background or other problem to make them ineligible to purchase a firearm.

Under the system, the gun dealer maintains a record of the transaction, but the federal government keeps no such identifying paperwork.

According to a Justice Department report, less than 2% of those seeking to purchase firearms were denied because of background checks from 1998 through 2009.

Opponents cite that figure as evidence that the system fails to stop illegal weapons sales that the legislation seeks to target, while supporters say the result shows the system keeps some guns out of the hands of the wrong people and the system should be expanded and strengthened.
The-CNN-Wire/Atlanta/+1-404-827-WIRE(9473)