The New Old – Discovering The Coverings Of Alt History

There are many memes supporting what seems to be a mass of interconnected false paradigms floating around in the minds of men today, many of which are designed to alter or outright change the perception of what we helplessly pretend and call as history. You know, his story? The story told of our own story…

From the Origin of Man to Fomenko’s Tartarian paradise to flat earth sophistry to the forever improvable religion of science known as the big bang, there is obviously a concerted effort, if not to merely hide the mythos of cultural, political, and scientific history, to utterly destroy its perspective relationship to the current state of international and religious affairs. And why not? What dictator, what royal family, and what challenger to such elitist tyranny would not want to put forward a historical timeline from which the tyrant justifies his current tyranny? Wasn’t it Orwell that so self-evidently stated he who controls the past, controls the future; and he who controls the present, controls the past?

For today, let us simply address just one of these man-made creators of mythos, the fictionality of Anatolii Fomenko.

I have made my own opinions on what is history and why it can never be trusted clear on this blog and in my book, with the exception being only the laws and opinions contained within the primary sources of the time. For example, the history of America’s pioneering of organized, legalized, state-sanctioned Eugenics can be found in the annals of Supreme Court decisions on forced sterilizations and within the records of the University system from which it was first given traction. We may also know the true nature of the past when presidents and prime ministers are finally apt to apologize for their government’s past actions; for instance the many chemical and biological weapons testing done against unwitting populations. The victims, as the intended receivers of such lame apologies done only after the statute of limitations takes effect or after those involved are already dead, are certainly primary evidence of what can be called true history.

But when it comes to the types of fallacious, mythological, patriotic, and ironically detailed stories told for the purpose of justifying the current role and intolerable actions of the modern ruling elite, we should never fool ourselves that these stories of history exist for any other reason than to foment the continued existence of the illegitimate inheritance of the fruit of those historical tales, which of course are perpetually granted to the offspring of those historical characters. The Queen in right, the presidents and prime ministers and congresses that are her direct descended bloodline of cousins, and all those who, with unwavering nepotistical allegiance, follow in the glory of that family history, where all other 99.99% of the history of common men is ignored to showcase the few powerful criminals that supposedly invented and founded the kingdoms, nations, religions, and legal systems of law that we allow them to govern us with today. After all, it is the current, corrupt bloodline of elitist men that was shat out of the inheritable rectum of their forefathers that control the present by preserving the past so as to ensure the future control of that offspring which shall equally be shat from their own rectums. After all, they certainly cannot be the rulers of men without the inculturation and indoctrination of their own historical narrative, the very lame and fragile justification presented to us all so that we are made to actually believe that their fictional, unjustifiable power structure is just the way it is. History, me thinks, is the greatest excuse for both action and inaction ever invented by men. We are controlled by the institutionalized, exaggerated lies that make up the past just as our children will be controlled by the predictably programed future presented to us by those that continue by birth-right to control the present. Worst of all, we lie to ourselves, using this false pretense of narrative, political history as our own excuse, to pretend our own moral hands are tied, justifying our passive place in the hierarchical mid to low order, pretending we are not voluntarily participating in and even loving our servitude to that upper class and their schema.

The mental state that we all currently occupy in our volutnary, collective obedience to what history apparently has birthed for us was penned and politically planned for us well before any story of America was born. For the conspired brokerage of power is not new to history, and the common man is doomed to repeat history not because he doesn’t study it, but because he passively ignores it. This ignorance manifests its ugly head in every generation, based on both the promise and the possession of the benefits of voluntary participation, voluntary servitude to that which bestows such flattering titles, artificial rights and benefits, and the artificial status of socioeconomics. Love of money. We are lost to history by voluntarily relinquishing our place in it, for the writers of history only include those tales of men whose actions are either favorable to their own continued power brokerage or whom are against it, for every hero needs a villain, even the state. Government has no purpose without the enemies it must create and continuously alienate to justify its militarized armies and police. The politics of obedience are nothing new…

—=—

“Poor, wretched, and stupid peoples, nations determined on your own misfortune and blind to your own good! You let yourselves be deprived before your own eyes of the best part of your revenues; your fields are plundered, your homes robbed, your family heirlooms taken away. You live in such a way that you cannot claim a single thing as your own; and it would seem that you consider yourselves lucky to be loaned your property, your families, and your very lives. All this havoc, this misfortune, this ruin, descends upon you not from alien foes, but from the one enemy whom you yourselves render as powerful as he is, for whom you go bravely to war, for whose greatness you do not refuse to offer your own bodies unto death. He who thus domineers over you has only two eyes, only two hands, only one body, no more than is possessed by the least man among the infinite numbers dwelling in your cities; he has indeed nothing more than the power that you confer upon him to destroy you. Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy on you, if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with, if he does not borrow them from you? The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own? How does he have any power over you except through you? How would he dare assail you if he had no cooperation from you? What could he do to you if you yourselves did not connive with the thief who plunders you, if you were not accomplices of the murderer who kills you, if you were not traitors to yourselves? You sow your crops in order that he may ravage them, you install and furnish your homes to give him goods to pillage; you rear your daughters that he may gratify his lust; you bring up your children in order that he may confer upon them the greatest privilege he knows – to be led into his battles, to be delivered to butchery, to be made the servants of his greed and the instruments of his vengeance; you yield your bodies unto hard labor in order that he may indulge in his delights and wallow in his filthy pleasures; you weaken yourselves in order to make him the stronger and the mightier to hold you in check. From all these indignities, such as the very beasts of the field would not endure, you can deliver yourselves if you try, not by taking action,but merely by willing to be free. Resolve to serve no hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break into pieces?”

“…Let us therefore admit that all those things to which he is trained and accustomed seem natural to man and that only that is truly native to him which he receives with his primitive, untrained individuality. Thus custom becomes the first reason for voluntary servitude. Men are like handsome race horses who first bite the bit and later like it, and rearing under the saddle a while soon learn to enjoy displaying their harness and prance proudly beneath their trappings. Similarly men will grow accustomed to the idea that they have always been in subjection, that their fathers lived in the same way; they will think they are obliged to suffer this evil, and will persuade themselves by example and imitation of others, finally investing those who order them around with proprietary rights, based on the idea that it has always been that way.”

—“The Politics Of Obedience: A Discourse On Voluntary Servitude,” by Etienne de La Boetie

—=—

Custom is just another word for an appeal to history.

But let us get back to the subject at hand…

I am posting this entry upon my journey merely to help you, my fellow slave to history, to understand how historical revisionism is being played out before our eyes, and how easy it is to be duped by the power brokers of nations that seek to alter their own past so as to justify their future actions — despotism and tyranny in the name of history.

And so today I simply wish to point you in the right direction, that you may find both the logic and reasons behind the historical revisionism coming from the Russian empire. For a while it has been hard not to hear of the exploits of one Anatolii Fomenko and the glorious revisionism of Tartary. As if the lost kingdom of Atlantas was suddenly discovered, Tartary is being promoted as its simulated surrogate. This alternative, revisionist effort to recreate history in Russia’s own image is a very interesting case study, believed by innocents and promoted as the new truth by fools. But let us examine the purpose behind this revisioning by looking at just who in the present is attempting to control the past in order to rule in the future.

For this, I pass on to you a book entitled: History as Therapy: Alternative History and Nationalist Imaginings in Russia, by Konstantin Sheiko and Stephen Brown, published May 1, 2014. I was fortunate enough to have found a link to this on a comment board a while back, the commenter I wish to thank and apologize for not being able to source here. That said, I will simply quote from the book and leave a link to a free version as an Ebook for those interested, while asking those with the ability to support the authors by purchasing the ebook if you decide to read and utilize it. I feel this is a very important work, especially for those feeling lost in the melee of historical nonsense and trickery being promoted by so many outlets. The book is described as such:

This astonishing book explores the delusional imaginings of Russia’s past by the pseudo-scientific ‘Alternative History’ movement. Despite the chaotic collapse of two empires in the last century, Russia’s glorious imperial past continues to inspire millions. The lively movement of ‘Alternative History’, diligently re-writing Russia’s past and ‘rediscovering’ its hidden greatness, has been growing dramatically since the collapse of Communism in 1991. Virtually unknown in the West, these pseudo-historians have published best-selling books, attracted widespread media attention, and are a prominent voice in Internet discussions about Russian and world history. Alternative History claims that Russia is much older than Ancient Egypt, Greece and Rome; that the medieval Mongol Empire was in fact a Slav-Turk world empire; and that, in the twentieth century, duplicitous foreign powers stabbed Russia in the back and stole its empire. For its followers the key to Russia’s greatness in the future lies in ensuring that Russians understand the true wealth of their past. Alternative history has become a popular therapy for Russians still coming to terms with the reality of Post-Soviet life. It is one of the forces shapinga new Russian nationalism and an important factor in the geopolitics of the twenty-first century.

Turning first to page 41, with regard to Fomenko, we read the following, which is the end of Chapter Two, leading into the beginning of Chapter Three:

—=—

Begin excerpt:

When Communism collapsed and the new Russian state was established in 1991, there were half-hearted attempts at galvanizing popular opinion around a new sense of what it meant to be Russian. President Yeltsin appointed and expert committee ‘to establish the true nature of Russia’, and newspapers offered prizes for ‘the best definition of Russianness’. Nonetheless, the 1990’s came and went without any clear answer from the state as to who the Russians were and what Russia stood for. Even Putin when he emerged as Yeltsin’s protege and likely successor in 1999 portrayed himself as a technocrat rather than as an ideologue.

What Putin and his administration failed to develop was some sort of over-arching narrative to inspire popular support. As Graham Gill has put it, the presidential administrations of Yeltsin and Putin failed ‘to articulate a consistent narrative embodying a vision of either Russia’s future or of how it was to be constituted …. No presidential vision has become embedded in the public lore of the society’. Instead of a widely accepted ‘national idea’ that described Russia’s new circumstances and inspired enthusiasm among ordinary people, an ideological void emerged, which was soon filled by a cacophony of competing voices that ranged from Communists to ultra-nationalists, from the Orthodox Church to neo-Pagan occultists, and from Eurasianist empire builders to national separatists. Russia’s rulers soon came to fear that they might have built their new state upon the ideological equivalent of quicksand.

It is this fear of having no firm historical foundation in place that lies behind the increasingly desperate efforts of Putin and his allies, from the mid 2000’s, to write a ‘usable history’ that explains and justifies the new post-Communist Russia. We get a sense of how important the post-Communist elites view the writing of history from the reflections of Putin himself. From Putin downwards, there is little patience with the multiplicity of views and competing interpretations that are the stock-in-trade of conventional history writing. In 2007, Putin told a gathering of schoolteachers that there was a need for a new primer in Russian History to overcome the confusion and errors contained in the dozens of school texts then in use.

The result was a text credited to Fillipov that became notorious among its liberal critics for reinventing Stalin as an effective state builder who made occasional mistakes. The logic of this text implied that the authoritarian rather than the liberal rule worked best for Russia. Leon Aron has argued that Putin and his administration’s understanding of history can be summarized in two axioms:

The first axiom appears to be this: although there were ‘mistakes’ and ‘dark spots’, what mattered was the survival and strengthening of the state–by whatever means necessary. And by that standard, the Soviet Union was a glittering success, and the costs were justified… the second axiom of modern Russian history according to Putin is that the Soviet Union was a ‘besieged fortress’, forever under the threat of attack by the West, and that the machinations of the West were responsible not only for Soviet foreign policy but also for a great deal of domestic misfortune. The overarching aim of this and all future historical narratives is the ‘normalization’ of the monstrosity of Soviet totalitarianism, the manufacture of justifications and excuses for its crimes.

As Brandenberger has put it, Fillipov’s textbook did not explicitly rehabilitate Stalin, but rather established the justification for authoritarian rule. Russia’s survival depended upon a ‘500-year political tradition which demanded that power be concentrated in the hands of a single, autocratic ruler and his centralized administrative system’. Thus, Russian unity and strength from above will better safeguard Russian national interests than grassroots political parties, social movements, or civic organizations.

In 2009, President Medvedev declared that Russia’s history had undergone a process of falsification during the 2000’s, and that in recent times the atacks from abroad had become more angry and aggressive. His answer to this problem was to establish the Presidential Commission of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia’s Interests, which would operate from 15 May 2009 to 14 February 2012. Putin and Medvedev entrusted staunch allies from their political retinue with the task of fashioning this history. Key figures in these efforts are the Speaker of the Duma and Chairman of the Russian Historical Society, Segie Naryshkin, and the Minister of Culture and Chairman of the Russian Military-Historical Society, Vladimir Medinskii. The president of the Commission charged with protecting Russian history was Naryshkin. No doubt conscious of the accusations of Orwellian thought control that the Commission would attract, Naryshkin assured his listeners that his organization never intended to make historians speak with one voice. Instead, the Commission’s aim was to rebut the harmful propaganda that had been directed at Russia as a result of the rewriting of history in other countries.

Like Fillipov’s textbook, Naryshkin’s commission signaled the regime’s intentions but did not immediately solve the problem. Obviously dissatisfied with the results of previous attempts to end the ‘porridge in the head’, the re-elected President Putin in 2013 outlined yet another attempt to establish a new historical regime. He ordered the Ministry of Education, the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the Historical Society to collaborate in producing textbooks without ‘contradictions and ambiguities’. The textbooks are expected to emphasis patriotism, Russian Orthodoxy, civic mindedness (grazhdanstvennost), the must ethnic nature of Russia, and its mighty civilizational and martial achievements.

Happily, some of this work was already being undertaken at a popular level. Alternative history is much too radical to be embraced in full by government officials, let alone Putin. Yet, as we shall see, there is good reason for thinking that Putin and his ideologies are borrowing ideas from alternative history to pupulate their own hitherto dreary, unimaginative, and, often, absent narrative about what post-Communist Russia stands for. It is not too much to suggest that alternative history and regime propaganda are moving in the same direction, just at different speeds.

Putin’s propagandists have recently discovered what has been well described in the scholarly literature as ‘civilizational nationalism’. Russia’s imperial restoration will need ideas and enthusiasm, and not just oil and gas, thus:

The Kremlin’s canonization of the idea of a special thousand-year civilization that predetermines a ‘special path’ for Russia is gradually elevating to the rank of an official ‘one true doctrine’ to replace Marxism-Lenonism. An army of paid and unpaid propagandists are mining this vein of gold, turning a theory into a political technology (art).

This ‘army of paid and unpaid propagandists’ contains a good many regiments of alternative historians and the readers with whom they are in conversation. Precisely because of its unabashed nationalism, alternative history has foreshadowed the type of ‘political technology’ that Putin and his administration is likely to deploy in order to resolve the complicated issue of Russian identity. A radicalized ethnographies-nationalism might yet shape public opinion in unpredictable ways, enhancing the potential for a new Russian Revolution. Tamed and harnessed, however, ‘civilizational nationalism’ may provide the glue that the present administration needs to maintain its grip on power.

Chapter Three: Empire, Nation, Nationalism

‘The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.’

–George Orwell

Part One: Russia’s Multiple Identities

To make sense of alternative history, we first need to explore in more detail Russia’s identity crisis. Fomenko entitled his major work Imperiia or Empire, a word that has much more positive connotations in Russia than it does in the West. Empire, for Fomenko and for many Russians, means the repository of political and economic power projected across a huge geographic era. This meaning is very different to Lenin’s concept of exploited and subjected colonial peoples. This positive view of the imperial past is reflected in the fact that the overwhelming majority of Russians have found it impossible to distinguish between Russia as nation-state and Russia as empire. Thus the term ‘nationalism’, in the context of Russia, is a problematic one.

The growing vitality of nationalism has been one of the most remarked upon aspects of the post-Communist history of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. The context for Fomenko is the collapse in 1991 of the Soviet Union, the Communist state that more or less occupied the territory inherited from the Tsarist Empire. The Soviet Union’s principal successor state, the Russian Federation, is the world’s largest state even if it is only half the size of its Communist and Tsarist predecessors. Politically and geographically, modern Russia occupies the same space today as it did approximately three hundred years ago in the era of Peter the Great. Since the collapse of Communism, Russian intellectuals and political commentators have sought out solid ground in order to make sense of Russia’s new geography and its diminished place in the hierarchy of the world’s great powers…

As for why alternative historians have made such fantastic claims about Russia, it must be remembered that Russian alternative history is in competition with the alternative history of other national groups. The writers under consideration in this book have found themselves in a contest with their counterparts in Ukraine, Central Asia, and the Turkic peoples within the Russian Federation. Popular, as distinct from state-inspired, chauvinism was frowned upon in Tsarist and Soviet times. Only in the last two decades has nationalism become part of a public conversation about the merits of rival ethnic histories. As Shnirelman has put it:

For people who believe they have been deprived of their cultural legacy, invention of the past becomes a powerful instrument–first, for the raising of self-esteem and the re-evaluation of their position among other peoples, and second, for demanding special rights and privileges with respect to others who lack their glorious past…

Since the 1980’s, a huge literature has developed around terms such as patriotism, nations, and nationalism. Patriotism seems less problematic and can be defined as strongly positive feelings towards one’s homeland. As for the term ‘nation’, Hobsbawm distinguishes between the nation as citizenship, ‘in which the nation consists of collective sovereignty based in common political participation’, and the nation as ethnicity, ‘in which the nation comprises all those of supposedly common language, history, or broader cultural identity. Gellner came up with the most enduring definition of nationalism itself when he wrote that ‘Nationalism is primarily a political principle which holds that the political and the national unit should be congruent’. While definitions are important, assigning ethnic groups to a particular homeland has proved more challenging…

After Peter, it took another century for Russian rulers to formulate an official vision of what Russia was. Under Tsar Nicholas the First and his Minister for Education, Uvarov, the trinity of ‘Autocracy, Orthodoxy and Narodnost’ was coined. Narodnost is deliberately vague in the way it evokes a bond between the peoples of Russia and the land they occupy. It was in effect an antidote to nations within the Russian empire seeking their own states. Its aim was to bind the people of Russia together by suggesting that they were special and morally superior to the West…

End Excerpt.

–Earlier in the book, from page 14, we read:

Begin Excerpt.

In the immediate aftermath of the collapse of Communism, Russian universities were in an especially parlous economic position. In the 1990’s, history writing, like the Russian state itself, entered a state of flux. The erstwhile conformism of Soviet academia collapsed from within as some historians defended the Communist past, others became trenchant critics of the former regime, and the majority looked anxiously to see which way the political wind was blowing. Their Western counterparts were keen to investigate and publish materials relating to the more sensational aspects of the Soviet period such as the Stalinist purges. But in Russia and the West, there was only a limited market for scholarly ruminations on arcane controversies connected to Russias ancient and medieval past.

It was into this virtually empty space that alternative historians, led by the likes of the New Chronology movement of Anatolii Fomenko and Gleb Nosovskii, ventured. Fomenko (1945-) is a renouned mathematician who has belonged to the academic staff of Moscow State University since the Soviet era. He is a member of Russia’s Academy of Sciences, a professor with a doctorate in applied physics and mathematics, head of the Mechanical-Mathematical Department of Moscow State University, and author of more than one hundred and eighty scientific works. He has written dozens of well-respected monographs and textbooks in his specialist field of mathematics. Fomenko was awarded Russia’s State Award in 1996 for his scientific achievements. The qualifications of Nosovskii (1958-) include a PhD in physics and mathematics. More notoriously, they are the authors of more than one hundred publications dealing with Russian and world history. The volume of their output is astonishing and reflects both of their enthusiasm and their mass-production methods as different members of their team specialize in different periods and locations. Since the collapse of Communism, New Chronology has thrived as a publishing phenomenon, despite and partly because of the hefty criticisms directed at it from conventional scholars. It has become better known in the West too, attracting the attention of scholars who are concerned about its impact upon ordinary Russians’ understanding of history and Russia’s place in the world. The English language title of Fomenko’s magnum opus is History: Fiction or Science. Fomenko’s ambition is to replace the existing ‘fiction’ with the ‘science’ of alternative history. Fomenko and New Chronology represent a popular rebellion against the version of history preferred by Russia’s scholarly elite. Or, as one scholar has put it, New Chronology is a prime example of ‘the conjunction between conspiracy theory and the rewriting of history [that] makes up one of the main instruments for disseminating nationalist theories in today’s Russia, theories based on a kind of post-modern, paranoid cultural imaginary.

The number of critics of Fomenko and his fellow alternative historians has certainly grown in recent years, and there have been premature announcements of New Chronology’s imminent demise. Yet alternative history has shown a remarkable capacity to absorb the blows inflicted by its critics and move forward, its momentum enhanced rather than deflated. So far, alternative history has not succeeded in winning over the academic departments of major universities, nor has it replaced the existing school textbooks. The alternative strategy is not to outscore the professional historians in a debate of a particular controversy or time period. Rather, the plan is to render conventional scholarship irrelevant by winning over the book-buying public and Russia’s growing army of internet users. Their passion is expressed in their apocalyptic version of patriotism for, in the words of one alternative historian:

When a nation maintains her historical memory, she will fight not only for material values, but also for the honor of the state (derzhava)… But if this nation is forced to abandon traditional national values and substitute instead a set of alien principles, then this nation is like a giant that was defeated not by the sword, but poisoned with a substance that darkens the mind and paralyses the will.

–End Excerpt

—=—

What would a nation, an empire, be without its historical source and reason for existence? The answer to this question is always the same – the more force that is used against the common people signifies the further away from its original purpose and ideals the empire has gotten. In America, we are under military rule, martial law, via the invocation of war powers (emergency) and the subsequent soft suspension of the constitution. We are made to believe we live in independent states just as in colonial history, that we are actually part of the state we live in instead of just foreign US residents, yet we are all birthed into the nation, into Washington DC, a district wholly outside and foreign to any of the 50 individual States. The union is no longer controlled by the States, the States are controlled by the empire corporation called “United States”, seated outside of and foreign to any State. Yet the appeal to the romantic history of the original thirteen colonies-turned-States after their war and struggle for independence is all we hear about, a false narrative used to justify the exact tyranny and oppression of a federal government that the King of England possessed while using the Crown’s appeal to its own history and right to rule over the corporations (colonies) set up by it. The Russian Federation (federal government district) is, to its various member states, not at all dissimilar to what the United States federal government is to the 50 states United – an illegitimate (de facto) dictator.

In other words, every present-day nation is an appeal to history. Every revolution is an appeal to history. Every law is an appeal to history. Every elected and appointed official is an appeal to history. The political process is an appeal to history. If you ask the president of the United States what makes his flattering title and dictatorial war powers legitimate, he will say “the people”. If you ask the people the same question, they will make an appeal to history — he was voted in at some point and that’s the way it has been since before I was born. That’s how the system works. Really? I’m sure lab rats and zoo animals think the same exact thing while rotting in the cages they were born in…

—=—

“The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities, that makes it seem inconceivable that other ways are viable, that removes the sense that there is an outside.”

–Allan Bloom, “The Closing of the American Mind”

—=—

Of course, every nation has its own, personalized history, a justification for its current and future existence linked inextricably to the past. Therefore, each kingdom must balance itself ever so carefully upon the lies that constitute each individually perspective history of the multiplicity of demented, endlessly providential, manifest destiny attributed to every empire. And God is always somehow on the side of every nation, a petty excuse on the Grandest of scales for inexcusable actions in both war and peace, which also means that God is at the same time against every nation too — the paradox of a false attribution to the empty idols of deity — many nations under and over their own version of God…

I imagine that, at the time when the American civil war was ending, the empire of the federal United States under its illegitimate emergency war powers, which had just decimated half of its own unionized states to the south, must have had a very similar crisis of conscious about their own perceived history, and likely had the same conversations about conserving the good, reimagining the bad, and essentially reinventing United States history to justify their own federalized, standing army so demonized in the Declaration of Independence. Let’s say it was a war over slavery… yeah, that’s it, we had to free the slaves! We’ll be heroes! And the common, illiterate dupes will never know the difference…

But the greatest takeaway from this is in the term itself: alternative history. If history were true in the first place, there could be no alternative. Truth, you see, has no alternative. It’s the truth. You cannot have two differing (alternative) truths about the same thing. And so I stress again that history is never truth, but only the empire’s foundational propaganda that seeks to justify the purpose of its modern and future (post-modern) existence.

But there’s an even darker side to history. You see, the history of nations, being the story of each nation’s purpose to exist, is always a sociopath. The history of each nation is as the Narcissus admiring its own reflection, warring against any enemy that might cause ripples in the clear historical view of itself. Revisionist history is like breaking the vanity mirror of ones false appearance, like wiping the lipstick from a pig, for every nation loves only itself while hiding behind imaginary borders, fictitious lines drawn in imaginary sand that pretendedly say do not cross.

Indeed, history is not merely a story told, it is the very identity of all false existence. History is always the past, and he that controls the past controls the future. The future is everything after history, including most parts of the more recent past. One has to wonder what could possibly keep the United States empire and union of states together if it weren’t for the viral history of Philadelphia and the continental congress. Viral history… it’s like a disease. It prevents betterment. It ensures nepotism, and subsequently, despotism. And, like any other corporation out there that had humble beginnings, where we meagerly, obsucrely came from is and always will be the greatest tool of manipulation possible.

History represents the success stories of empire, the fish story no one in their right mind and reason should believe in. For history is never truth. It simply cannot be. Nothing made by men is natural. Nothing invented by man is truth. And truth cannot be revisioned… unless, that is, you call it history.

Now imagine if suddenly, instead of existing to please the historical narrative, we acted as if the reason and purpose for our existence is to ensure the future? Imagine if we lived for a better tomorrow, instead of using yesterday to justify our God-awful actions of today? Imagine if history did not dictate the present, and that, therefore, the future was something other than ensuring the continuity of government, or in other words, insuring the new feudalism of modern empire will continue into tomorrow. Imagine what you could do to serve others, to live for the purpose of preserving Life and the Source of Life, the highest Law, instead of merely preserving the emptiness of history’s inventions, the despotism of empire.

14 Comments

R Perez

Clint! Whats Clint up to these days? Omg it seems like forever since you posted something or Im not paying attention. A lot has been happening like all my life I seemed to miss in this with my family. Illuminate craziness and Im pissed. I miss you man. I hope all is well and in good health with you. Can you tell us what you know on the mind control if illuminate? I love you insight. Take care- Racquel

Indeed… I’m working on a new vaccine/drug/doctor documentary, more like an audio/video book, about 20 hours long. Will be the end all be all of any debate. Primary sourced proof. A phd study on the whole subject and history. But most of all, it will be a preservation of what is fallaciously called the anti-vaccine movement, which is being censored and book-burned as we speak. You’d be shocked at how much information they put in their own studies that show their own fraud.

The mind control (govern-ment) is everywhere and yet it is nowhere. You either see through it or it redirects your sight. The so-called illuminate are the keepers of secrets, their own homemade secrets, false mysteries. The question you must ask yourself is why do you care what their symbols and magic spellings mean? They aren’t real. They aren’t of God, not of Nature and Its Law. Their only power is your belief and respect that they and their secrets exist in Reality. I assure you they don’t. Your mind can only be controlled as much as you want it to be, and many of us enjoy that control structure, that matrix. They are not illuminated, for they are liars. There is no light in the darkness of lies or the king thereof. In Truth, the illuminati simply doesn’t exist, but the idea exists, and that’s all that is needed for control. Belief is more powerful than truth, yet it can never defeat truth. If you live in truth in all things, then there is no way to control your mind.

MikeV

History is the deadliest of Silent Weapons! And yet simply just the perspective of whos using it, “Cui Bono” who’s benefiting?

Bill Cooper did atleast a couple hundred hours on decoding and exposing all the Masonic/Illuminati B.S. and in the end that what he explained its all simply BS they dangle the carrot of some secret knowledge higher level of some great secrets but its just a system of Control period. They utilize religion in members because your already subject to control and they need you to have a moral compass which they then manipulate for their hidden agendas. But in the end Masonry is your Religion above all a death cult of secrecy at higher levels. And crazy is that one of Hilters first actions was going after Masonic Lodges.

Man they are going into full gear now on the vaccine stuff the censorship is getting crazy with FB blatantly shutting down deniers and NY (biggest leader in states policies) cut the Religious exemption just a few weeks ago. LOL just saw a video from a not famous rapper that said he had his new music video pulled and Youtube stated something about “vaccines”in the warning, crazy part is he said a bunch of conspiracy topics but never mentioned vaccines SO they just grouping anything conspiracy related and Vaccine Deniers in the same group.
Funny I had mentioned on an older blog about what if they used Silver in vaccines instead as a preservative and it actually boosted immune function? Well found a book by grandaddy Searle himself, shows they actually did head to head studies Silver vs Mercury, so then obviously later decided to go with the toxic Mercury and patent-able derivatives like Thimerosal.https://archive.org/details/useofcolloidsinh00searuoft/page/n6

Mia

Ahhh…what a relief! That post just validated my intuitive take on reading, i.e. absolutely not worth the time/effort as no-one/no-thing trustworthy – present company excepted, of course. 😕 Good – that’s settled then. Podcasts for moi; reading to be left those like your good-self who have the ability to sort the wheat from the tares. The likes of m’self will continue to plant greens for sustenance, groom the dog and offer the 86 yr. old neighbour a lift to the shops to pick up some victuals. What else is a simple soul to do when one can be duped so readily. 🤦‍♀️ Ho hum!
[Being, as one is, non-‘Merikan, have recently discovered the [previously unknown to one] phenomenon that is Owen Benjamin – his daily offerings of comedy, homesteading/’dad’-ing tales, coupled with ‘wizardry’ exposure are a joy to listen too.]
Miss your podcasting but I guess a different variety of fish to fry in this moment of now, eh.
Gratitude for your offerings – always welcome, albeit sparse.
Many blessings.
🌹🌻💖

Maxx

I blame alcohol. The problem is 99% of the people will never understand this. Nor will they care to understand this. They are Golem to be used and abused and abused some more. This has been going on since the discovery of fire. The world has always been satanic communist.

Ri-chard

You know something is wrong in America, but you can’t put your finger on it because too few want to discuss the cause.

We were all taught in school that We the People/the Colonist won the Revolutionary War/War of Independence. Therefore, we should start exploring the documentation for those words proving who the victor was. Remember the victors write the history taught in their school systems.

July 4, 1776 – United States Declaration of Independence was signed.

October 23, 1777 – British Fleet defeated in the Delaware River
October 19 1781 – British Lieutenant General Charles, Earl Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, Virginia, ending the Siege of Yorktown, and virtually guaranteeing American independence. The surrender at Yorktown finally convinced Parliament that war with the colonists was futile. Peace negotiations began the following spring of 1782. “The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has been well hidden by historians. Cornwallis revealed to Washington that “a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.” Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self-contradiction: “Your churches will be used to teach the Jew’s religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government.
September 30, 1783 – The first document created documenting the foundations for the founding of America is the Definitive Treaty of Peace which formally ended the war.
See > https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp It was ratified by Congress January 14, 1784; ratified by Great Britain April 9, 1784. Benjamin Franklin (English Esquire and Mason) was the lead negotiator for this Treaty along with John Jay (English Esquire) and John Adams (English Esquire). All were highly educated men and well-schooled in the Kings rules and laws.

Note; Most Treaties must figure out what to do about several different things: cease fire and other hostilities, people, land, money and identify the spoils of the war the victor may claim.

If we won, the war and plenary independence then why is the KING made Arch-treasurer (controller of money and banking) and Prince Elector (controller of the Body Politic/States) of the Holy Roman empire and the United States of America. His Brittanic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz., New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and independent states. So why were the people not recognized as free, sovereign and independent by Esquire Ben Franklin as our representative? (A most important of all omissions) plus, why weren’t the King’s claims addressed and made as null and void in the First Virginia Charter? https://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/va01.asp

So much for the accuracy of their public-school history books.

May 25 to September 17, 1787 – The Constitutional Convention took place from, in the old Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia. Although the Convention was intended to revise the league of states and first system of government under the Articles of Confederation, the intention from the outset of many of its proponents, chief among them James Madison of Virginia and Alexander Hamilton of New York, was to create a new government rather than fix the existing one. The delegates elected George Washington of Virginia, former commanding general of the Continental Army in the late American Revolutionary War and proponent of a stronger national government, to preside over the Convention. The result of the Convention was the creation of the Constitution for the United States of America, placing the Convention among the most significant events in American history.

1789 First Act of Congress – The congress made it so that no one would repeat the word phrase in the preamble ” the Constitution for the United States of America” for purposes of taking the oath of office. All are instructed to repeat the words “the constitution of the United States”. If words mean everything then why did Congress change and omit them from their constitutional employment contract given to them by, We the People?

Now the frauds by the impersonators can move forward in a self-serving manner

1798 War Power Act – George Washington, Head Mason enacted the War Power Act and used the ‘Emergency’ portion to create the First Bank of America in the King’s name to pay him back for his losses during the war. Note: Nothing was given to the Colonist for their losses.

Prior to the war the Colonist were seeking their freedom from British rule. Here a few of the things they were seeking.
1.) Control of their money and banking – Commodity money was used as a choice when cash (coins and paper money) was scarce. Commodities such as tobacco, beaver skins, and wampum served as money at various times and places with Private Banking for coins and paper. Trading goods and services among themselves without their goods and labor being taxed.
2.) The 13 colonies were seeking Common Law based on the foundations of God’s Law and Natural Law utilizing the MAXIMS of Law and Equity. The Thirteen Colonies considered it to be the final bases for all law in America or ever to be in America… “the colonies were so impressed with the idea of an overruling law of nature that the laws of God and so-called natural laws were regarded as the true laws, and all temporal legislation was considered to be binding only in so far as it was an expression of this natural law”
Yes, back then there were some white hats. James Wilson, the foremost lawyer at the Constitutional Convention, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, and a man who was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1789 by President Washington was well familiar with this legal principal stated above called Natural Law and stated; “Parliament may, unquestionably, be controlled by natural or revealed law, proceeding from divine authority”. 3.) The Colonist sought to own their land with free and clear title – free of government. Allodial Title is a system of real property law in which individuals may fully own all the rights associated with property and dispose of that property as they wish. The system had been evolving for many centuries, but the theory and the term were first clearly articulated by Thomas Jefferson in 1774, when he argued against an attempted land grab by King George III and used the theory to provide one of the supports for the American Revolutionary War. Contrast the allodial system with the feudal system, in which the sovereign owned all land and could grant usage rights to others, but those rights were revocable at will.

Question – Did the 1783 Treaty and 1789 First Act of Congress have any impact on the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution for the United States of America? I believe they made both document dormant at best.

Do you think it is time to stop identifying new crimes and rehashing the obvious older ones and fix the source that has allowed all of them?
IMHO, I have come to realize that a binding corrective action is to write a new Treaty and this time it shall be written by We the People as the representatives of the actual winners of the war, the Colonist as the last man standing.

If you understand that a Treaty is a contract, then a new Treaty of Peace must be written to cancel out the previous Treaty of Peace. This is how we can capture the spoils of war, all of them that are owed to us, and especially to do this for our Veterans and all our children in their future for their freedom. We shall first declare our individual sovereignty as that will allow us to take what is owed to us. The constitution for the United States of America shall have a new oath taken immediately. A detail definition of what a Republic is, the responsibilities to it and that every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence. Article IV, Section 4.

Remedy Our Veteran First for the harms done to them by the government we didn’t know we had. I believe we should choose to educate our veterans first with these truths because it is our veterans of America that have sacrificed life, limb and family. This has caused children of past and present generations to suffer without fathers in their lives day to day, thereby distorting social structures and slowly transforming the foundation that blessed us. Help us help you help the veterans and their families to receive what was promised and what should be to correct the abuse that has been laid upon them by the persons claiming to care aka POLITICIANS.

Timothy

I guess the ultimate story is the one from Genesis where Eve is told that “surely you shall not die; you will become (as) God, if you can believe it; if you can get other men to believe it.” Every nation seems adversarial to the any other nation under that ultimate story. Who can tell the best story? Who can escape the Earth, from consequences of the story? Revelations 18, on the other end, indicates that all the Nations — the storytellers — will lament the end of their stories in one day and just in one hour. At that time all the Babel will have ceased.

Ri-chard

Then to remember there were two Adams. first one was created by God and the angelic ones to be of them. Then the 2nd Adam was created from the dust of the earth and Eve was created from Adams rib/DNA.
So was there a 1st mate for Adam and her name was Lilith?

dana

Great post as usual. I read your reply to R Perez which also leads me to another question. You say the illuminati and all other secret societies do not exist in Nature except the collective belief in their lies which gives them power over us. That is quite true. Have you considered the teachings of advaita vedanta which basically says everything else but awareness (consciousness) is an illusion? In other words one singular awareness is being deceived through the five senses by the illusory play of life? Governments, politics, societal structures, money systems, religions, history, educational systems are all illusions being played out before awareness which makes us erroneously believe its actually who we inherently are and part of our lives. I’m not saying since all this is an illusion we should just sit and watch but we must constantly be on the guard to distinguish Truth from falsehood, fiction, lies. If you ask me what is a government or a nation I could point to fictional maps, flags, passports or a man made seat of government at a fictional location but deep within me I know its not part of the natural construct (Kingdom of God) but still something keeps deceiving me about these fictions. Is this what you are essentially driving at on this blog?

Frankly (freely of mind) speaking, I think it’s very dangerous to believe consciousness is Reality. I think this is mind control programing, which goes well with the push for DMT and other synthesized from Nature compounds. Let me explain… If consciousness were Reality, then Reality would be the consciousness of a single man, which cannot exist without something Real, that is, as something outside of Nature. And no, we are not a computer algorithm in some simulation matrix, that is the same predictive programming. The danger of this thought is that it is no different, in any way, than the thought that man is God (Creator), or in other words, that there is no God at all. Translation, no higher authority than man. I can think of nothing more dangerous than that. In fact, one who believes that his own conscious portrayal of the world is what creates Reality could only be called a narcissist, or at best a psychopath. That’s why it’s the perfect match with acid and shrooms. Spirituality is attained only when one detaches his own mind from Nature, from Reality, in order to see with neutrality and Purity what Nature (Reality) actually is, that you and I am part of It, and that Truth is never, without exception, anything that the mind produces. Truth is perceived by the mind, not created. The recreation of Reality our mind puts forth is in fact an extremely limited spectrum of light (energy). This recreation is not Creation. Why? Because to see what Exists and have conscious awareness about it requires that such an Existent object be in Existence before our minds might recreate it in its own form and image (opinion). So no, consciousness cannot be Reality because without Reality, what could possibly Exist that has a conscious?

My blog and book is designed to help you see the metaphor in everything, that every thing not only has at least one word to describe it, which most people understand and use, but also a second, third, or greater number of variations both corporal and incorporeal that have the sole purpose of higher verse (language), and that we are controlled by our use of the metaphor as what is the real without understanding the difference. Nature is never, without exception, made of the words, ideas, or designs of men. To believe a word and the object that word is attached to are indeed the same (in identity), that is, are attached and therefore un-attachable, as form attached to substance, body to soul, is to believe in the artificialness of all things (names). It is to see the world through a matrix of symbols that spell names, and therefore all Real things, all things in Reality, are just conscious descriptions of their form without the substance of the actual part of Reality (Nature). IN other words, that a mortgage on a house somehow equals ownership in the house, or that purchasing a neon fucking soft-plastic bracelet from a mall kiosk will somehow stop breast cancer or global warming. Run for the cure? Walk for the sick? What crap.

Of course it’s all the fiction of men. Everything with a name is a fiction, that is, persons, places, and things (nouns). You say government as if its a real thing, a noun, instead of its non-authoratarian use as an action or adjective. You say education and societal structures as nouns, referring to specific ones, by name, instead of using the non-binding verb or adjective to describe something that really happens to the mind or in society. You see, you have been looking for the entrance to the rabbit hole when the whole time you have spent your entire life already in it. You never thought to look for the exit because you only see, do, hear, and say words (nouns) that keep you inside the simulation. Part of the simulation is of course the doors you find that lead nowhere, or even further into the hole you already find yourself in. The exit can only be seen when Reality (Nature) is no longer held as equal, identical, in sameness (identity) with the word (noun) used to describe It. The exit is merely the realization that there was never any hole in the first place, that what is fiction can never be Reality, no lie can be Truth, and no thought by man is ever Reality, only the simulated, censored, limited view we are gifted to receive by God’s (Nature’s) Design. Like consciousness cannot exist without Reality, neither can man exist without Nature and Its self-Existent (non-man-made) Law, nor can an exit to a rabbit hole exist without first there being a rabbit hole (metaphorically speaking).

As you see more and more psylosybin, DMT, shrooms, etc being pushed and decriminalized, you are going to see exactly what I have described above – a bunch of men that believe they are god, gods, and that their own mind makes (creates) reality, so whatever happens to Reality (Nature) is only a figment of each of our imaginations.

Honestly, if you want that last statement to be your Truth, then you are necessarily my enemy, the enemy of Truth (God). I trust you are starting to sense the exit, which is the entrance, backwards. This is a spiritual war that only now, in modern technology, advancements, and events, can be translated from the mysteries of the Bible prophecy. What people don’t understand is that prophecy is a self-evident outcome, not a prediction, but a warning of what will happen inevitably when certain Laws of God and actions and inventions of man are broken and out of control. A prophecy is only as good as the men that cause it to come True by their own willful ignorance of the very fact that they are the cause. They are in the hole digging it deeper, never finding the exit, that is, the non-existence of the hole in the first place, revelation of the legalism mind-trap. And what is more anti-Christ and anti-God (anti-Nature) than the now almost complete, self-serving, self-fulfilling Artificial Intelligence man is creating just to prove his own false, virtual simulation of “conscious reality” ???