On Tuesday we posted an appeal for readers to take action regarding a current state of national emergency in the US, declared by George W. Bush after 9/11/01. Since then, the appeal has been sent to at least 20,000 people via email, linked to from numerous other sites, and reposted in full at several sites. We are beginning to get notification from readers of specific Representatives and Senators to whom letters are being sent, with follow-up calls planned. Please continue to send those to us at responses[at]911truth.org. We intend to start posting that information shortly.

Some people have written to ask whether we've completely lost our collective mind... "Do you really think this Congress--who has refused to investigate or even talk about 9/11 crimes for all these years--is suddenly going to divulge honest information about their lack of oversight of National Emergencies, and act to terminate it just because you send them a letter?!" Well, uhm, not really, no.

But do we think some of them will look into it and respond with a real answer? Perhaps. Do we think we'll get a lot of boilerplate responses about "the danger terrorists pose to the safety of every God-fearing Amurikan and so we must remain vigilant," but don't actually answer either question? Probably. However, equally important is simply getting this information to them, and to Americans who read this and had no idea of the situation. Personally, my (Janice) experience has been that when I called my Rep previously, outraged about another national emergency proclamation, not one staffer in his office was able to answer a single question about it, because they had no idea one had been issued! Nor had they ever heard that Congress is able to overturn any executive order if they act on it within the first 30 days. NEVER heard of that! So yes, it's important to bring these issues to their attention, and tell them that we are concerned, and paying attention.

Each house of Congress is required by the National Emergencies Act to meet and review every national emergency proclaimed, every six months. Have they done that? Are they doing their job in overseeing the Executive? We've seen for many years now that the answer to that is a resounding no. Do they know the implications of a president declaring a national emergency, the potential effects on the people, and on Congress itself? Shouldn't we hold them accountable to do all aspects of their job, particularly when required by law? Yes. And if they don't, and won't even answer our questions when we specifically ask them to do so, they've abdicated their responsibility in a manner that needs to be very clearly, publicly revealed. If we were running a business, we would FIRE our employee immediately for such subordination ... why would we not fire our Reps/Senators--who ARE also our employees, after all--for the same failure to fulfill their job requirements?

There WILL eventually be a straw that breaks the back of this dirty, rotten system. But not until we've piled on enough straws that its back begins to crack under the weight of citizen oversight and participation. Why not add a bit more weight right now?

For those of you reading this who are not yet on our e-mail list, here's what went out today:

Dear 911truth.org Readers,

On Tuesday we posted this article about the current State of Emergency in the US, and are sending it now to ask you to help get some answers from our elected officials on this very important issue. By speaking with your reps about this, you not only push them to take the legally required action on our behalf, but you inform them of the situation and offer further information for their own study.

Please take just a couple minutes now to read this and the specifics of the appeal at the end so you can formulate a letter or email to your reps this weekend. If you would like to do further reading on this subject, we included links at the end to two useful documents prepared by the Congressional Research Service about national emergencies. Also forward this information to your email contacts and post to your sites, if possible. Ideally, we'd like to get responses from every single member of the House and Senate.

If you have questions, of course we encourage you to get in touch with us. And please submit responses from your Senators/Rep to us for posting in a summary at the site.

On 9/11 the Bush administration declared a State of Emergency (SOE), which was
formally proclaimed on September 14, 2001, and extended by Bush repeatedly thereafter,
most recently on August 28, 2008.1
Under cover of this SOE, Bush secretly enacted many extreme measures, ranging
from suspension of habeas corpus to preparations for martial law in America; all
these were undertaken as part of secret so-called "Continuity of Government" (COG)
procedures associated with the SOE, and first instituted on 9/11.2and3

The National Emergencies Act, one of the post-Watergate reforms so detested
by Vice-President Cheney, requires specifically that

Not later than six months after a national emergency is declared, and not
later than the end of each six-month period thereafter that such emergency
continues, each House of Congress shall meet to consider a vote on a joint
resolution to determine whether that emergency shall be terminated.
(50 U.S.C. 1622 (2002)4

Last fall one of us appealed on the Internet for the Democrats in Congress to take
this statutorily required step, and also to learn what secret COG measures were
being enacted under the SOE.5 There was no
response.

In February 2009 we sent to officials in Washington the following appeal to consider terminating the State of Emergency.
The appeal was sent to President Obama's staff in the White House, and to the
staff of Nancy Pelosi, Peter DeFazio, and Dennis Kucinich in Congress. Almost
two months have passed, and there has not yet been any response from the addressees.

We are now appealing to the readers of this post to contact
their representatives in Congress, and demand that they consider the termination
of the State of Emergency, as is required of them by law.

This is the letter sent February 10, 2009 by Peter Dale Scott and Dan Hamburg:Will Obama and Congress End the State of Emergency?

On September 11, 2001, the government declared a state of emergency. That state
of emergency was formally put in writing6 on 9/14/2001 consistent with Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C.).

The state of emergency has continued in full force and effect from 9/11/01
to the present. It was most recently extended on August 28, 2008 for an additional
year:

Notice: Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to
Certain Terrorist Attacks

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C.),
I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency I declared on September
14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect to the terrorist attacks at
the World Trade Center, New York, New York, the Pentagon, and aboard United
Airlines flight 93, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks
on the United States.

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency declared
on September 14, 2001, and the powers and authorities adopted to deal with
that emergency, must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2008. Therefore,
I am continuing in effect for an additional year the national emergency
I declared on September 14, 2001, with respect to the terrorist threat.

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to
the Congress.

GEORGE W. BUSH
THE WHITE HOUSE,
August 28, 2008.

Under a series of Presidential Decision Directives, the Bush administration
enacted secret emergency powers, reportedly affecting the U.S. Constitution,
which even the members of the House Homeland Security Committee have not been
permitted to review.

Congress has a statutory obligation to address this situation. Section 1622(b)
of the National Emergencies Act states that: "Not later than six months
after a national emergency is declared, and not later than the end of each six-month
period thereafter that such emergency continues, each House of Congress shall
meet to consider a vote on a joint resolution to determine whether that emergency
shall be terminated."

We now have a new President, supported by a new Congress, elected with a campaign
promise of "Change." In this changed atmosphere, two questions need to be answered
to satisfy the legitimate concerns of the American people:

Will President Obama allow the state of national emergency, first
declared by President George W. Bush on 9/14/01 and re-declared seven times,
to remain in effect?

Will Congress meet their statutory responsibilities under Section
1622(b) of the National Emergencies Act, and meet to determine whether that
emergency shall be terminated?

Our appeal to readers: Please contact your Representative and Senators (with
a copy to the Homeland Security Committee Chairs (contact info below), utilizing this information and requesting a specific response
to these two questions. You may also wish to follow up with a phone call to
their offices, asking to speak with the staffer who can answer your questions
about national emergencies. Submit responses you receive and/or answers to
the questions you ask, to responses@911truth.org for posting here. Please also post this appeal to your websites, and forward to your email lists.

More information on National Emergency Powers, from a Congressional Research
Report last updated August 30, 2007, is available at OpenCRS.com.
A related CRS Report, Martial Law and National Emergency, is available at www.fas.org

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content,
and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will
not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements
contained in this article.