Obama Orders DHS to Scrub Records of Muslims with Terror Ties

After 15 years of service to his country at Homeland Security, Philip Haney left, believing that the Obama’s enforced political scrubbing of Muslim intelligence records needed to stop future terror attacks.

Speaking with Sean Hannity, Haney said that had the records not been deleted, “Farook would have been put on the no-fly list and not allowed to travel, or his pending fiancé would have been denied a visa because of his affiliation with an organization with plausible ties to terrorism.”

“Oh, my God,” Hannity responded. “This is unconscionable.”

The following testimony from Philip Haney, breaking his silence, uncovers how Obama has kept the DHS from using their intelligence gathered to connect the dots and stop terror attacks. Travel back to 2009, when Flight 253 would have been blown up had the passengers not subdued Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. Obama excoriated the DHS for dropping the ball.

Amid the chaos of the 2009 holiday travel season, jihadists planned to slaughter 290 innocent travelers on a Christmas Day flight from the Netherlands to Detroit, Michigan. Twenty-three-year old Nigerian Muslim Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab intended to detonate Northwest Airlines Flight 253, but the explosives in his underwear malfunctioned and brave passengers subdued him until he could be arrested. The graphic and traumatic defeat they planned for the United States failed, that time.

Following the attempted attack, President Obama threw the intelligence community under the bus for its failure to “connect the dots.” He said, “this was not a failure to collect intelligence, it was a failure to integrate and understand the intelligence that we already had.”

Philip Haney said Obama’s words destroyed the morale of the DHS and the rage toward the administration was deep, as there was a “bureaucratic effort to destroy actual intelligence gathered”.

Most Americans were unaware of the enormous damage to morale at the Department of Homeland Security, where I worked, his condemnation caused. His words infuriated many of us because we knew his administration had been engaged in a bureaucratic effort to destroy the raw material—the actual intelligence we had collected for years, and erase those dots. The dots constitute the intelligence needed to keep Americans safe, and the Obama administration was ordering they be wiped away.

In early November, prior to the December Day attack, Haney was ordered to delete or modify several hundred records of people tied to specific Islamist terror groups. Forced to scrub records and prohibited from entering important information, tied the hands of these agents.

Just before that Christmas Day attack, in early November 2009, I was ordered by my superiors at the Department of Homeland Security to delete or modify several hundred records of individuals tied to designated Islamist terror groups like Hamas from the important federal database, the Treasury Enforcement Communications System (TECS). These types of records are the basis for any ability to “connect dots.” Every day, DHS Customs and Border Protection officers watch entering and exiting many individuals associated with known terrorist affiliations, then look for patterns. Enforcing a political scrubbing of records of Muslims greatly affected our ability to do that. Even worse, going forward, my colleagues and I were prohibited from entering pertinent information into the database.

A few weeks later, in my office at the Port of Atlanta, the television hummed with the inevitable Congressional hearings that follow any terrorist attack. While members of Congress grilled Obama administration officials, demanding why their subordinates were still failing to understand the intelligence they had gathered, I was being forced to delete and scrub the records. And I was well aware that, as a result, it was going to be vastly more difficult to “connect the dots” in the future—especially before an attack occurs.

Haney makes this provocative points, that the type of information that the Obama administration has ordered wiped from travel and national security databases the type that could have helped prevent subsequent attacks.

As the number of successful and attempted Islamic terrorist attacks on America increased, the type of information that the Obama administration ordered removed from travel and national security databases was the kind of information that, if properly assessed, could have prevented subsequent domestic Islamist attacks like the ones committed by Faisal Shahzad (May 2010), Detroit “honor killing” perpetrator Rahim A. Alfetlawi (2011); Amine El Khalifi, who plotted to blow up the U.S. Capitol (2012); Dzhokhar or Tamerlan Tsarnaev who conducted the Boston Marathon bombing (2013); Oklahoma beheading suspect Alton Nolen (2014); or Muhammed Yusuf Abdulazeez, who opened fire on two military installations in Chattanooga, Tennessee (2015).

“It is demoralizing—and infuriating,” said Haney. “It is very plausible that one or more of the subsequent terror attacks on the homeland could have been prevented… if DHS had been allowed to do our jobs in late 2009.”

Wayne Shaw , These crimes are already going on here & Obama is sneaking in Somalian/Syrian refugees into small towns outside of big cities in Texas/N.Carolina /S. Carolina , Michigan(crappy Govnr.)/Wisconsin(crappy Govnr.)/Minnesota(crappy Govnr.) same crimes there now !!!———>Muslim rapes in Sweden

Just one case of Muslim animals raping & all of them at the same time all penis’s in
According to Afton Bladet, a group of eight Muslim migrants, aged 21-34, were sentenced for the brutal gang rape of a young Swedish mother at an asylum center in Mariannelund.

“He [Rahmati] was the one who started the abuse. The first time it was common vaginal$#%&[email protected]* Then they took turns raping her. Both vaginally and anally. They pressed it (penises) so deep down her throat that she had difficulty breathing,” reads the verdict.
The gang rape was so severe that when police found the victim the morning after, she was disoriented and smeared with her own blood. The young mother sustained such horrendous injury that she was bound to a wheelchair and required psychiatric care for four weeks.
The woman courageously described the abuse to authorities, disclosing that the men took turns beating and raping her all night, laughing and applauding the entire time. The eight refugees raped her vaginally, orally, and anally, sometimes all at the same time.
This case might be the most gruesome in Sweden’s history, but it certainly won’t be the last. In fact, the European country is experiencing a massive wave of sexual assault with the influx of Muslim migrants granted access.
Mad World News previously reported that a 23-year-old Swedish woman was brutally gang raped in Södermalm by at least three Muslim refugees. Of course, one of the asylum seekers was immediately released “because his age could not be determined.
In another case, a 3-year-old girl was raped by a 40-year-old Muslim refugee, but instead of turning in the pedophile, the Swedish Migration Board covered up his crime and moved him to another location.
In yet another case, a 15-year-old girl was gang raped by a group of Muslim migrants, but her attackers were promptly acquitted because the judge believed the teen could have stopped her attackers if she wanted.

Well now you will see how really non-peaceful Muslims are & this is why they do not belong here & these are here on a Liberals farm & now
took it over from them……..nice job Oval Office……..Gene

Liberals Just Found Out What Happens When You Open Your Home To Muslim Refugees DECEMBER 27, 2015
BY DEAN JAMES

2 white liberals found out the hard way that it’s not a good idea to open your hearts or homes to Muslim refugees- in fact it’s downright dangerous.

Back in July, News 24 did an article titled “Meet the angels who opened their hearts and home to 143 lost strangers” which was a liberal lovefest about the kindness and generosity of the couple as well as how well behaved and grateful the Muslims were.

Andrew and Rae Wartnaby opened up their 50-acre farm to over 100 Muslim refugees who were reportedly displaced during ‘xenophobic attacks.’

“We just have a heart for children. We want children to have families, be fed and looked after. At the beginning of the attacks I wanted to go to Durban and help, but God said to me that I should not get involved now. He said we must wait and he would need us in the end,” said Rae.

When asked how the family was coping she said: “It’s been a day. Everybody is organized. We told everyone that they are welcome in our home and they are guests here.”

That was then. This is now.

Now, News 24 did a followup article titled, “Refugees turn on their host.”

Here’s an excerpt:

THE good Samaritans who took onto their farm over 100 refugees displaced by this year’s xenophobic violence, now claim they have been threatened with murder by the same people they had set out to help.

Besides property being destroyed, the ­family who took in the immigrants have also been accused of not helping them to be relocated back home or to another country, driving a chasm between them.

Owners of Hope Farm in Cato Ridge, ­Andrew and Rae Wartnaby, were yesterday forced to evacuate their 10 children from their farm house in fear that they would be attacked or used as “bargaining tools”.

This, after a group of the foreign nationals they are housing on their farm attacked their home in the early hours of yesterday morning and threatened to kill Andrew.

Andrew said the Muslims cut and broke down the fence. “Then in the early hours of the morning, at around 2 am, they came smashing on my windows and doors and saying that they will kill me because I work for the government and I am not helping them.”

Andrew said that as he looked through a window, he saw the tent at the group’s camp engulfed in flames. “I immediately asked if everyone is okay but they kept shouting that tonight was my night and they will kill me. I haven’t slept since then,” said Andrew.

“When we took everyone in, we said we would try and help, which we have. But they feel like it has been too long and we let them down. I have asked that group to leave my farm, but they refuse to and to be honest, I don’t know what is going to happen. All I know is that I don’t want to be murdered tonight,” said Andrew.

Mad World News points out that time and time again we desperately warn the left that their own agenda will turn on them, and we see this same immigration policy played out on a smaller scale with the Wartnabys.

Muslim migrants are fundamentally different from any other refugees escaping religious brutality and political tyranny. Although they often flee their own ideology’s savagery, they bring the same barbarity wherever they go.

The Islamic Prophet Muhammad perfectly modeled how to use migration and the generosity of others as a stepping stool by which to overtake them. As a refugee to Medina, the messenger quietly built up his followers before slaughtering, converting, exiling, and subjugating the very tribes that welcomed him to their thriving, tolerant city.

The multiculturalism, tolerance, and religious freedom that once prevailed was stripped away by the commands of Allah that require Muslims to fight every ounce of their ability to establish Sharia law and forcibly spread Islam until it is the only religion left.

Meanwhile, the Africans are still in control of the farm at time of writing, and the leftist whites, who might or might not have learned their lesson, are in hiding

Churchill thought this way till he past away!! Now you’ll know why Obama can not stand Churchill or England cause they jailed Obama’s father for being a Communist Organizer/Radical !!!! Next info will point this out clearly & show you how Obama is a false person & non-American !!!

Winston Churchill 1899.
“Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”

This is amazing. Even more amazing is that this hasn’t been published long before now.

CHURCHILL ON ISLAM

Unbelievable, but the speech below was written in 1899… (check Wikipedia – The River War).

The attached short speech from Winston Churchill, was delivered by him in 1899 when he was a young soldier and journalist. It probably sets out the current views of many, but expresses in the wonderful Churchillian turn of phrase and use of the English language, of which he was a past master. Sir Winston Churchill was, without doubt, one of the greatest men of the late 19th and 20th centuries.

He was a brave young soldier, a brilliant journalist, an extraordinary politician and statesman, a great war leader and British Prime Minister, to whom the Western world must be forever in his debt. He was a prophet in his own time. He died on 24th January 1965, at the grand old age of 90 and, after a lifetime of service to his country, was accorded a State funeral.

HERE IS THE SPEECH:

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome …”

Wayne Shaw , Read ##2. & then the post above comes into view on time & place & actual name of Kenya then !!!!—————>4 Simple Questions …..
1. Back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes’. So how can the official Obama ‘birth certificate’ state he is “African-American” when the term didn’t even exist at that time ?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961 and Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father.
No big deal, Right? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama’s father was born in “Kenya, East Africa”.
This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern except the fact that “KENYA” did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet EXIST? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963 it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate”.

(check it out below)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
3. On the Official Birth Certificate released by the White House the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”.
This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, respectively.
The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961
if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?https://www.hawaiipacifichealth.org/kapiolani/about-us/overview/
Why wasn’t any of this discussed in the major media?
4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama’s book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I’m not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama’s “birth certificate” says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should have put his father’s date of birth approximately 1936 – if my math holds (Honest! I did that without a calculator!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn’t been altered to satisfy the author’s goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest
stages of WW II his father wouldn’t have been more than 9 years old. Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes?
Very truly yours,
RICHARD R. SILVERLIEB
Attorney at Law
354 Eisenhower Parkway
Livingston, NJ 07039
“A pen in the hand of this president is far more dangerous than a gun in the hands of 200 million law-abiding citizens.
Impeachment in itself is not justice! We are talking orange stripes jumpsuit & long prison sentences.