The Clintons are clearly on a divergent path than President Obama. Hillary just Judod Obama in this informative article posted in the UK Daily Mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2215431/Death-U-S-ambassador-Chris-Stevens-revealed-AK-47s-grenade-attacks-smoke-filled-safe-room.html?ITO=1490

If she lies under oath, the public will be able to see thru here lies.
Put here under oath and let her say the don’t recalls, the following orders, etc. If she does that, she will be exposed. Bury that lying Bit$h under oath.

I am thinking that Hillary knows what can happen to her if she gets caught lying along side BJ, and she is planning her serpentine escape route.

In the early days, she was on the committee trying to get Nixon thrown out of office because of Watergate. She personally wrote the document which said that Nixon had no right to secure a lawyer. She is one crafty she-devil.

Possibly, but Clinton is way out on the limb with the YouTube story, I think she has to stick with it, or go all the way and admit she was pressured by Obama, she has to at least give a plausible reason why she lied for days to the public. I have to wonder, could the state department be turning on Hillary?

I wonder if all the career employees at State (maybe even other departments) are starting to wake up and see that the politicians are a threat to them - no one wants to be without a chair when the music stops.

81
posted on 10/13/2012 7:42:19 PM PDT
by scott7278
("...I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked..." - BHO)

That, sir, is no joke. Liberals will parse the truth into the most minute detail, then rearrange it to fit what ever conceptions they envision, all the while bogging down the country with their dissembling. This forum does not allow me to express what end they should meet.

If she lies under oath, the public will be able to see thru here lies. Put here under oath and let her say the dont recalls, the following orders, etc. If she does that, she will be exposed. Bury that lying Bit$h under oath.

they only have to stonewall for a few more weeks and the MSM only has to ignore it for a few more weeks then if Obama is elected it won't matter

I may have missed somethings here, but I know Clinton has repeatedly condemned the movie, but did she ever actually say it caused the attack? Being Bubba’s wife she would know how to parse words with great skill. If someone has a vid or a quoye where she actually blames the vid, I will stand corrected.

Looks like shes throwing Rice under the bus for that...or did I just read that part in, myself?

Now I'm really confused. The assumption I have to make here is that the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, is not a part of the State Department.

A quick wiki search reveals that her position was elevated to a cabinet-level position under the Obama administration (which it was not under GWB, but was under Clinton). So, she would have received her marching orders from the White House.

89
posted on 10/13/2012 7:52:52 PM PDT
by andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)

Hillary has some explaining to do. This was on her watch. I will never forget the picture of her as a young leftist lawyer at the Watergate hearings sitting there with her holier than thou look and out to skewer President Nixon.

so in the debate, Biden says “we” did not know about requests for additional security in Benghazi (in spite of testiomny in Congress just a day or two earlier that such requests HAD been made), and now state dept says “we” were not of the opinion the attack was a result of the anti-Islam” video

” The master of the double deal is Undersecretary for Management Kennedy, whom I have known for twenty years. Whatever he says in front of the committee, which will be a “sort of” defense of the Department and White House leadership in the Benghazi fiasco, you can be sure that behind the scenes he and his acolytes are throwing Clinton, Rice, etc., under the bus. He is not about to go down in flames alone. He will not throw himself on the grenade to save Clinton and Rice and Obama. If he dies, they die, too.”

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.