Post navigation

EVER since HUSSEIN Obama took over America’s helm, one anti-American thrust after another has jiggered the Constitution. Let’s just agree on this basis of fact.

TIME and again, patriots expected Congress to conduct their due diligence (but not through this and that theatrical “commission of inquiry”) towards a remedial process, even if the only alternative left was impeachment.

YES, this site also held out (false) hope that Congress would step up, but recognized when such a position became akin to chasing ghosts. Untenable. After all, how many times does a patriot need to be knocked upside the head to come to the depressing conclusion: regardless of countless unsustainable executive actions, as well as illegal foreign interventions, it is readily apparent that Congress has little inclination (nor incentive) to set Obama Inc. on the straight and narrow. You think?

STILL, back in Jan 2014 (while a lifetime ago in accrued mischief-making, even though a blink of the eye in real life terms), hope sprung eternal. In other words, this site reported:

And since a Maryland judge has it in her power to rectify an unprecedented national/western nightmare, whether or not she rises to this unparalleled challenge is the nation-shaking question.

In any event, whatever her decision, it will change the course of American history. Hell, America’s place in the free world, its founding principles, depends on which course she takes! The west in toto. Indeed, the WEIGHTY question becomes:is she up to the (mental) challenge? Who knows. Pray for her sound (legal) judgment. Her resolve, moral compass and steel spine are all prerequisites. She needs them all. Sigh. If only this blogger sat in her seat.

ONCE again, herein presented, one can examine a fraction of this blogger’s accumulated trails…hopefully, they will be put to use for the “trial of the century”!

ALAS, that was then and this is now. Without a doubt, HUSSEIN Obama is still upending the laws of the land with nary any push back. On the upside, Judge Hollander ruled in May 2014 thusly:

NEVERTHELESS, if, by some miracle, the court eventually ends up as the address which will finally unmask and upend the Fraud-in-Chief, the fact remains that he can commit even graver domestic and foreign harm, up until any compelling punishment is rendered. By the bye, from this perch’s standpoint, there are countless “legal” retributions which would be more than appropriate punishment, but let’s not digress.

THAT being stated, in juxtaposition to a runaway POTUS, Congress can hardly claim (patriotic) bragging rights, and that’s not an overblown assessment. And this truth brings us right back to the recent hullabaloo over the “veto-proof” (aka “hard bargain”) vote they supposedly boxed HUSSEIN Obama into, relative to Iran’s mullahs. Ahh….the watered down and leaky “Corker Bill”. In reality, if it stands as is, it will go down in history as their most craven appeasement to date. Here’s why….

YES, while the president has the authority to negotiate treaties – emphasis placed on negotiate – the Constitution demands that 2/3 of the senators agree. Indeed, this is the case because of the inherent danger to too much power accruing in one leader’s hands, even/especially if POTUS. Bulls eye. Stipulated, the Founders were more than prescient.

Under the proposed legislation, Congress can review the president’s deal with the radical Islamists and can reject it with a 60-vote margin. But Obama then can veto it, and it would take a 67-vote total to overturn the veto.

“We’ve turned the treaty provision on its head,” Levin said. “Instead of requiring two-thirds of the senators present to approve, this bill explicitly” demands 67 votes to stop the president.

“You need 67 votes to override a presidential veto to undo what Obama’s done,” he said. “Now we need a supermajority to override the president rather than a supermajority where the president needs approval for a treaty.”

WITH the above in mind, let’s pull back the curtain. Hence, the smoke will clear. AT its stripped base, the Senate just rewrote the Constitution, despite their bloviating:

“The United States Senate just rewrote the treaty provision of the Constitution,” he exclaimed. “This may be over the heads of most commentators … but it’s not over my head, and it won’t be over yours.”

He (Mark Levin) said under the Constitution, the president has the power to negotiate treaties, and they are approved “provided two-thirds of the senators present concur.”

He said such a supermajority (67 votes) was called for by the nation’s Founders because they believed that leaving such decisions to a single person or a single body wasn’t responsible.

“Alexander Hamilton tells us” that joint possession of such power provides the greater prospect of success, he said.

Under the proposed legislation, Congress can review the president’s deal with the radical Islamists and can reject it with a 60-vote margin. But Obama then can veto it, and it would take a 67-vote total to overturn the veto.

“We’ve turned the treaty provision on its head,” Levin said. “Instead of requiring two-thirds of the senators present to approve, this bill explicitly” demands 67 votes to stop the president.

“You need 67 votes to override a presidential veto to undo what Obama’s done,” he said. “Now we need a supermajority to override the president rather than a supermajority where the president needs approval for a treaty…..”

AS always, the devil is in the details, if one is astute enough to understand them. Talk about flipping the Constitution upside its head…

DO readers still require additional bullet proof ammunition to pinpoint what the Senate has really done, all in order to appear accommodating and non “warmongering”? Just imagine what the world would look like, if this gaggle of blow hards were in the Senate, when Hitler’s killing machine needed vanquishing. And what if Roosevelt wanted to give Hitler even more time (than he did) to prove his “peaceful” intent, and the Senate gave him said wiggle room?

IT goes without saying that Congress, for the most part, does “get it”, at least in terms of the inherent dangers (to the entire free world) attributed to a nuclear armed Iran. This is no longer up for debate.

BUT the above knowledge base hardly translates into Congress’s (the Senate, in this instance) ability to muster the will power to actually thwart Obama Inc.’s bullying tactics, whatever they entail.

BOTTOM LINE: Congress has been a front row witness to two-terms of wrecking balls, and each volley has been more devastating than the last. But now that HUSSEIN Obama is in his second term, the gravest damage of all is within his anti-American (anti-Israel) grasp, as he gifts a genocidal regime nuclear arms!