(22-01-2015 11:34 AM)Free Wrote: You do understand that you are employing the logical fallacy of shifting the burden of proof when you insist that I can't prove God doesn't exist, right?

This demonstrates theistic characteristics, and is identical to the theists argument.

I am not obligated to even respond to your fallacious logic, let alone provide any evidence.

You have the Burden of Proof, now prove your reasoning with evidence as to why you are not 7.0.

From your link you are trying to use to make your points.

Quote: "Apologists have the burden of proof for the existence of god since they are making a knowledge claim"

You are making a knowledge claim by stating you know god doesn't exist. The burden of proof is on both 1 and 7 positions.

Yes, and I showed the reasoning and evidence to support my claim, which no one here has disputed in any way. Not that i am in any way obligated to prove that position, since the burden of proof is always upon anyone making a claim of the existence of God, or possible existence.

Therefore, unless you actually address my reasoning and evidence- which not one of you has- it remains undisputed. Merely asserting that my position isn't correct is meaningless unless you successfully demonstrate why.