Tuesday, September 29, 2015

."All the other large and small nationalities and peoples are destined
to perish before long in the revolutionary world storm… these residual
fragments of peoples always become fanatical standard-bearers of
counter-revolution and remain so until their complete extirpation or
loss of their national character… [A general war will] wipe out all
these petty hidebound nations, down to their very names. The next world
war will result in the disappearance from the face of the earth not only
of reactionary classes and dynasties, but also of entire reactionary
peoples. And that, too, is a step forward." -- Friedrich Engels, "The Magyar Struggle," Neue Rhenische Zeitung, January 13, 1849
. Immediately
after Russia's October Revolution of 1917, Lenin withdrew from fighting
in World War One, although the formal end of Russia's involvement
wasn't until the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in March 1918. The Great War
in Europe had all been predicted by Marx and Engels decades earlier and
it appeared things were going exactly as they should. The next event
that should have happened was for the common-man (the workers) to throw
off their chains and unite under a new, global system of Communist Utopia.

Of course, it never happened. This was a pivotal and confusing moment in
the world of Marxism. Obviously, since the global revolution didn't
appear as predicted, Marx and Engels had gotten something wrong. It is
from here that "Marxism" goes from being strictly an economic theory and into the realm of cultural theory.

Sunday, September 27, 2015

."A world where men and women would be equal is easy to visualize, for that precisely is what the Soviet Revolution promised." - Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex (New York, Random House, 1952), p.806
.

One of the most common arguments I see made against the notion that
feminism and Marxism are one in the same goes something like this:

"Feminism and Marxism aren't related because Stalin's policy of xyz was
certainly not feminist!" (or Mao's, or Pol Pot's or Gorbachev - take
your pick).

Well, all these things may be true, but, one must also realize that
Marxism is kinda like Christianity in that while it has a large
over-riding ideology, there are many different denominations with
varying beliefs. Lenin's
interpretation of Marxism was one such type, called Leninism, and when
Stalin took over he interpreted Marxism in a different way - over-riding
some of Lenin's beliefs - and thus becoming "Stalinism." Mao as well
interpreted Marxism differently from Stalin, and this became known as
"Maoism." So, just as it is false to say that Protestants aren't
Christians because they don't have a Pope and never go to confession, so
is it false to say that Marxism and feminism are unrelated because of
reason XYZ during Boris Yeltsin' s vodka soaked tenure at the helm.

Mostly when people such as myself assert that Marxism and feminism are
one in the same, it has a lot to do with the philosophies behind
Marxism, such as the oppressor vs. victim class, the use of the Marxist
dialectic to manipulate the population, the "end-goal" of Marxism &
feminism being remarkably similar, and most of all it comes from Engels'
own words (Marx made a few references to liberating women, but Engels
really got into it).

Friday, September 25, 2015

. Is "someone" or some "thing" behind all of this monkeying around with our culture?

It's natural to seek someone to point a finger at, to try to explain how
this could have happened to us. There are many different opinions and
there are certainly enough pivotal events in history which are shrouded
in mystery or lost knowledge to fuel many a conspiracy theory.

I can see two reactions amongst my readers as I say this. The first is
going, "Well thank, goodness! I was wondering if he had the balls to
bring that subject up."

The Cervelati (33rd Order of the Salami)

"Et
Tu, Brute?" My other reader's eyes roll back in their heads as they
begin supress their gag reflex, "Oh no! Here comes the talk about the
Illuminati and the Protocols of the Elders Zion. Or wait, maybe this guy
believes it's the Rothschild's... and he's going to link both Hitler
and Marx to the banking elites and the Bilderberg Group... or perhaps
he'll tell us about the Masons, the Skull and Bones and the sex-party
initiations at the Bohemian Grove."

Well, not really - although I would like to briefly address some of
these ideas to illustrate where my general position is on the matter and
how it actually helped me understand the concepts of "truth" found
within these pages.

Wednesday, September 23, 2015

“Remember this: The strongest sign of
the decay of a nation is the feminization of men and the masculinization
of women. It is notable that in Communist nations women are exhorted,
and compelled, to do what has traditionally been men’s work. American
women, some of them, feel triumphant that they have broken down the
‘barricades’ between the work of the sexes. I hope they will still feel
triumphant when some commissar forces a shovel or an axe into their soft
hands and compels them to pound and cut forests and dig ditches. I hope
they will be ‘happy’ when a husband deserts them and they must support
their children and themselves alone. (After all, if a woman must be
‘free’ she shouldn’t object to men being free too, should she?) I hope
they will feel ‘fulfilled’ when they are given no more courtesies due to
their sex and no kindnesses, but are kicked aside on the subway buses
by men, and jostled out of the way by men on busy sidewalks and
elevators…. I hope, when they look in their mirrors, that they will be
pleased to see exhausted, embittered faces, and that they will be
consoled by their paychecks.”~ Taylor Caldwell, 1970

Monday, September 21, 2015

Ah… I suspect this question is based on the tired old feminist refrain, “Women were owned as chattel!”
.
I think in order for this question to be properly answered, one must first examine the concept that marriage is an economic contract based on property rights.

You see, all throughout the animal kingdom, motherhood is a pretty
common theme. It is positively everywhere! What is not common in the
animal kingdom however, is fatherhood. Nope, not too many baby deer know who their fathers are. Fatherhood is a foreign concept in most of the animal kingdom.

Female mammals often find themselves living in a herd filled with many
other females, all being bred by one dominant alpha male. The females
congregate in herds because it is the only way they and their offspring
can safely survive. Yes, herd living is true Communism where all is
shared and they all get fat or starve together. Ever wonder why women
tend to all think the same way and why they desire big, Socialist
government over individualism and freedom? Ever wonder why women will
stick up for another woman even when they know that woman is obviously in the wrong? It’s because of their allegiance to the herd. The herd comes first. Now you know.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

BRIFFAULT'S LAW
.“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the
animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association
with the male, no such association takes place.” -- Robert Briffault, The Mothers, I, 191
.The Corollaries to Briffault's law:

1 - Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.

2 - Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return
for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male
has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)

3 - A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future
association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of
time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the
degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).
.

***

. Some years ago, through the usual discourse of mindlessly arguing with
people on the internet, I met a woman online who went by the handle of
“Selkie.” I had no idea what a selkie was, so I typed it into Google and
discovered an interesting legend that I believe is directly about human
sexuality.

The mythological selkie
is similar to a mermaid, except the selkie is a seal which can shed its
skin and transform into a human being. The selkie can be either male or
female, but most are female. Once they are in their human form, if
their seal skin is taken and hidden from them, they are unable to turn
back into a seal and thus cannot return to their home in the sea.

Click for "The Wife of Noble Character"

Now, as the legend goes, female selkies make great wives when in their
human form and so men would hide the skins of selkies so they would stay
with them - for if she found her skin she would right away put it back
on, abandon her human husband and escape to the sea to seek out her male
selkie lover/husband.

There is an interesting twist though, in that
even after she abandons her human husband she will return from time to
time to visit the children which she had while with him.

Thursday, September 17, 2015

In an odd sort of way, I'm excited to tackle the next three points of Elizabeth Cady Stanton's Declaration of Sentiments,
for this is the culminating moment of an underlying theme found
throughout this book: The Truth, how it differs for men and women, and
why
it matters very much which one leads the other.

13
- He allows her in church, as well as State, but a subordinate
position, claiming Apostolic authority for her exclusion from the
ministry, and, with some exceptions, from any public participation in
the affairs of the Church.

14 - He has created a
false public sentiment by giving to the world a different code of
morals for men and women, by which moral delinquencies which exclude
women from society, are not only tolerated but deemed of little account
in man.15 - He has usurped the prerogative of
Jehovah himself, claiming it as his right to assign for her a sphere of
action, when that belongs to her conscience and her God.

***

"When the Cow Rides the Bull, Priest, Watch Your Skull!"

"Women can sing to more than one tune. What good were the Perihermeneias,
the Elenchi, divided into several branches, the Prior and Posterior
Analytics, logic, or the mathematical sciences to Aristotle? For a woman
surmounted all of these in mounting him and conquered the master of
logic. She placed a bit and headstall on his head and he was dragged
into solecism, barbastoma, and barbarism. The hussy used him as a horse
and spurred him on like a female ass. She lifted her crotch far too high
when she rode the male. The governor was governed and the roles of the
sexes reversed, for she was active and he passive, willing to neigh
under her. . . ." -- Woman over Wisdom, The Lamentations of Matheolus, 1295AD

***

First, let's be clear here. In case you haven't noticed, I am an unabashed sexist. I absolutely do not believe Gender is a Social Construct.
I think there certainly were social constructs society once endorsed,
but they were based upon our biological differences - and it was more or
less correct to structure society as it once was because of them. Our
civilization has endured for millenia - proof of its viability under
defined gender roles - while in the past century we've been tripping
over ourselves to commit cultural suicide.
The Bible, whether you believe in God or not, is the "blueprint" for
our civilization - it is the key to how our cultural and social mores
developed. It has proven itself to be a "Book of Life" because the
structure of the society it puts forth certainly endures, grows and
succeeds.

9 -
After depriving her of all rights as a married woman, if single and the
owner of property, he has taxed her to support a government which
recognizes her only when her property can be made profitable to it.

10
- He has monopolized nearly all the profitable employments, and from
those she is permitted to follow, she receives but a scanty
remuneration.

11 - He closes against her all the
avenues to wealth and distinction, which he considers most honorable to
himself. As a teacher of theology, medicine, or law, she is not known.

12 - He has denied her the facilities for obtaining a thorough education - all colleges being closed against her.
.

---

.
To show that I am not a horrible cretin of a misogynist,
I'm going to grant Elizabeth Cady Stanton her point number nine. I
wholeheartedly agree that a woman who owns property while single should
be allowed a voice if she is being taxed upon the property. This was the
basis for men having suffrage too, and indeed, this is how women slowly
on began getting more access to the vote - especially since women who
were widows owning substantial property holdings left behind by their
husbands paid hefty taxes indeed. Most of society thought this
reasonable as well, which is why women in such situations were soon
allowed to vote by proxy - they could send a man in their stead to
deliver their vote. (Women were sometimes given the vote in various states or municipalities long before 1919).
Back in those days, voting was quite often violent, with union leaders
trying to intimidate voters and riots erupting at the polls. So, instead
of sending these women into the dragon's lair, they arranged for such
property-holding women to vote by proxy rather than in person.

Touché, Elizabeth Cady Stanton.

However, I'd like to remind her that Sparta fell because, according to Aristotle, its faulty inheritance laws resulted in women owning 2/5 of the land - so, there's what we think is fair, and there's what works.
The two need balance. I suspect women not holding property outside of
marriage, as addressed in point six, would suffice to keep this in check
in our civilization because it would keep the number much smaller than
that which Aristotle claimed as the cause of Sparta's plummeting
birthrates. (How much of the population were widows and single women
back in 1848? Not that much.) Keep in mind this is a legal right, not an "unalienable" one, which has been established earlier. Legal rights are about making society "function."

4
- Having deprived her of this first right as a citizen, the elective
franchise, thereby leaving her without representation in the halls of
legislation, he has oppressed her on all sides.

When I looked at this point, I struggled a bit whether to include it in
the last section, which was about the nature of the State and the
difference between inalienable rights and legal rights, or whether it
should be included in this section - which will deal much more with the
notion of "equality" in society. It belongs in both because we first
must clarify what is exactly meant by this statement.

Although the first three points of the Declaration of Sentiments are in
regard to the vote, and this is what Elizabeth Cady Stanton is referring
to as the "first right of a citizen," it's already been shown that
voting is not an inalienable right, but a legal one.

The
phrase "a stopped clock is right twice a day" comes to mind here,
because although she was wrong about the vote, she actually is right to
say "the first right is equality" - and in fact, she is perfectly valid
when, in the beginning of her drawing off the Declaration of
Independence, she only makes the single alteration of inserting "and
women" into it:

Friday, September 11, 2015

Feminism started as an organized movement in 1848 at the Seneca Falls
Convention on Women's rights, which had an attendence of around 300
people. It was here that the Declaration of Sentiments put down
the foundations of women's demands. It's principle author was Elizabeth
Cady Stanton and it was signed by 100 people: 68 women and 32 men.

---

Despite being later known as the "suffragettes," at the time of the Declaration of Sentiment's
signing, "the vote" was considered the most controversial of the
sentiments, in-so-far as it even made some of the signers hesistant to
endorse the document in its entirety.

I can see people's reactions already,, "Aha! Proof of the misogynist old days!" No,
it wasn't really "misogyny" that was behind it - not entirely anyways.
You have to keep in mind that this was 1848 and America's War for
Independence had finished only 65 years earlier. It was about as fresh
in the minds of the people as the Second World War is to us in the
modern day. Many people's parents had lived through the American
Revolution and their grandparents had fought in it. The people of that
time were quite aware of the principles behind the Declaration of
Independence and the nature of their rights under the framework of a Constitutional Republic.

Wednesday, September 09, 2015

This female clock is really driving me mad, for her quarrelsome din
doesn't stop for a moment. The tongue of a quarrelsome woman never
tires of chiming in. She even drowns out the sound of the church bell.
A nagging wife couldn't care less whether her words are wise or
foolish, provided that the sound of her own voice can be heard. She
simply pursues her own ends; there's not a grain of sense in what she
says; in fact she finds it impossible to have a decent thought. She
doesn't want her husband to be the boss and finds fault with
everything he does. Rightly or wrongly, the husband has no choice: he
has to put up with the situation and keep his mouth shut if he wants
to remain in one piece. No man, however self disciplined or
clear-sighted he may be, can protect himself adequately against this. A
husband has to like what the wife likes, and disapprove of what she
hates and criticize what she criticizes so that her opinions appear to
be right. So anyone who wishes to immolate himself on the altar of
marriage will have a lot to put up with. Fifteen times, both day and
night, he will suffer without respite and he will be sorely tormented.
Indeed, I believe that this torture is worse than the torments of
hell, with its chains, fire, and iron.

Men and women are after different things when they “debate.
. Men tend to, but not always, hold the truth to be the decider of the
debate. (Manginas excepted – thus the name). The man who illustrates the
truth the best, is generally considered the winner of a debate.
Women, not so much. And don’t forget, women scoff at our “school yard
rules.” Nothing seems sillier to a woman than the male “code.” When
women fight/argue, there are no rules she adheres to. Women decide who
“wins” a debate by who has been the snotty-mouthiest and by who
emotionally manipulates the other into submission. The truth matters
not a bit to women.

"If men are always more or less deceived on the subject of women,
it is because that they forget that they and women do not speak
altogether the same language, and that words have not the same weight
or the same meaning for them, especially in questions of feeling.
Whether from shyness or precaution or artifice, a woman never speaks
out her whole thought, and moreover what she herself knows of it is but
a part of what it really is. Complete frankness seems to be
impossible to her, and complete self-knowledge seems to be forbidden
her. If she is a sphinx to us, it is because she is a riddle of
doubtful meaning even to herself. She has no need of perfidy, for she
is mystery itself. A woman is something fugitive, irrational,
indeterminable, illogical, and contradictory. A great deal of
forbearance ought to be shown her, and a good deal of prudence
exercised with regard to her, for she may bring about innumerable
evils without knowing it, capable of all kinds of devotion, and of all
kinds of treason, "monstre incompréhensible,'' raised to the second
power, she is at once the delight and the terror of men." -- The Intimate Journal of Henri Amiel, Dec. 26, 1868

Monday, September 07, 2015

”The most insidious effect of affirmative action quotas is a kind of
psychic castration… the removal of the source of a man’s identity. By
contriving the nonsense that women can do whatever a man can do (which
they obviously can’t), they’ve leveled men’s purpose to the extent that
men effectively have no purpose. The equivalent would be to remove
women’s wombs, and render them sterile.

”I remember the first time I saw the slogan "A woman without a man is
like a fish without a bicycle", I knew my face had just been spit in.
Men were not just useless to women, we were irrelevant. We had no
purpose in a woman's life, and did not belong in her world at all. It
was a message of hate, dismissal, and refutation. But, I also saw it as a
warning of what was to come. It was like seeing clouds on the horizon,
and knowing that it is time to get under cover because a storm is
brewing. And, since it was obviously smearing shit in my face, it was
going to be a shit storm.” -- zenpriest, Hate Bounces

Saturday, September 05, 2015

Question: How Do Porcupines Mate?.Answer: Very Carefully!
.
The Gender War has been going on for a long, long time now - since the
beginning of time, really. Perhaps sometimes it calms down and becomes a
mere "Battle of Sexes," while at other times it turns into a more
serious "war," but this antagonism between the sexes always exists.

In
fact, one might say it is the very purpose of "the sexes." They are
supposed to test each other as
a way of seeking out superior genes. It's
what happens nearly everywhere there is sexual reproduction, from
simple organisms right up to the complex ones. When there is sexual
reproduction there is a measure of hostility between the sexes as they
compete and weed out one another, each seeking their own best interests.
It's a messy but effective way of overcoming adversity - which is often why a single sex species will change itself into a two-sex species, to
overcome environmental adversity or other hardships which requires rapid adaption.
Once the adversity has been conquered, these "inter-sexual" species will revert back
to single sex again.

Thursday, September 03, 2015

"There has never been a case of men and women reigning together,
but wherever on the earth men are found, there we see that men rule,
and women are ruled, and that on this plan, both sexes live in harmony.
But on the other hand, the Amazons, who are reported to have held rule
of old, did not suffer men to stop in their country, but reared only
their female children, killing the males to whom they gave birth." -- Spinoza

The
legend/myth of the Amazons is one that I always find particularly
interesting. They are mentioned by both the Greeks and the Romans and
are thought to have lived either in present day Turkey, the Ukraine or
Libya. Perhaps they even lived in Minoan Crete. In some stories, they killed all the males and went to
neighbouring tribes once a year to have sex & get pregnant with the
next generation. The resulting male children would either be killed,
sent back to their fathers, or left to fend for themselves in the wild.
In other stories, after being victorious in war, they would not kill all
of the men but rather, take some of them back as slaves with whom they
would have sex once or twice a year. One thing is certain, they did not
much care for males!
. I
think this legend reveals something which
exists deeply within nature itself, namely, that if females do not find
males useful, they are actively hostile to those males and eject them
from participating in their society, which is mostly made of females.

Tuesday, September 01, 2015

At first it may seem like an assault against your good senses to think
of adult women as mere children or teenagers. How could they be? They go
through life and mature just like men do, don’t they? Once they are
thirty or forty, don’t they behave as adults just as thirty or forty
year old men do? Actually, there is much evidence to the contrary.
Perhaps men are so keen to believe that women mature the same as them
(throughout their entire lives) because in the early stages of our
lives, females do actually mature faster than males.

”The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it
in reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and
mental faculties scarcely before he is eight and twenty; woman when she
is eighteen; but hers is a reason of very narrow limitations. This is
why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what
is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing
for reality, and prefer trifling things to the most important.” -- Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women (1851)

What's Wrong With The World -- G.K. Chesterton (excerpts)

Sex and Character -- by Otto Weininger

The Encyclopedia Marxofeminist

Feminist "Equality" Includes The Loss of Free Speech

If you are afraid to speak against tyranny, then you are already a slave. To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer and impossible to ignore. -- JBR Yant

"We can't expect the American People to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism." -- Nikita Krushchev

THE ANIMAL FARM REALITY OF "FEMINIST EQUALITY:"

"Differences [between men and women], including the products of social inequality, MAKE UNEQUAL TREATMENT NOT UNEQUAL AT ALL." -- Catharine MacKinnon, "Reflections on Sex Equality Under Law," Yale Law Journal, 1991

The Demographic Trap

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within." -- Josef Stalin

Back to the Bible

"The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into smaller states and all-national isolation, not only to bring the nations closer to each other, but also to merge them." -- V.I. Lenin

No Thanks - We'd Rather Be Canadian!

"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one" ~Benjamin Franklin

Man-Made Global Warming is a Hoax being used to bring about Global Communism (Globalization)

"Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains." -- Herbert Hoover

Just Doing My Part to Fight Global Warming!

"The threat of environmental crisis will be the 'international disaster key' that will unlock the New World Order." -- Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in "A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind", by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5

Rule by Science

Philosophy Corner

“Dialectical thought is related to vulgar thinking in the same way that a motion picture is related to a still photograph. The motion picture does not outlaw the still photograph but combines a series of them according to the laws of motion.” -- Leon Trotsky

Dialectical Thought is a Cornerstone of Marxism, and Feminism (Because They Are One In the Same)

The Marxist Dialectic's Zig-Zag

Wishing to advance in a room full of people, I do not walk through the aisle and straight toward my goal. Nor do I move slowly through the crowd shaking hands with friends and acquaintences, discussing points of interest, gradually nearing the objective. The dialectical pathway is different. It consists of a resolute forward advance followed by an abrubt turn and retreat. Having retreated a distance there is another turn and advance. Through a series of forwardbackward steps the goal is approached. To advance thus is to advance dialectically. The Communist goal is fixed and changeless, but their direction of advance reverses itself from time to time. They approach their goal by going directly away from it a considerable portion of the time. Lenin wrote the textbook, One Step Forward, Two Steps Back. Chinese Communist schoolchildren are taught to do the dialectical march taking three steps forward and two steps back. If we judge where the Communists are going by the direction in which they are moving we will obviously be deceived -- Dr. Fred Schwarz, President of Christian Anti-Communism Crusade

The Pussy Pass

All's Fair In Love and War

The Matriarchy Lives! (Click Picture)

"I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of 'Women's Rights', with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were woman to 'unsex' themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings, and would surely perish without male protection." -- Queen Victoria, 1870