Coverage of main and cross-cutting topics

Further Reading

Linkage

Possibility of linkage among databases

Linkable to other person databases through anonymised personal number.

Linkage

Possibility of linkage among databases

Linkable to other person databases through anonymised personal number.

Linkage

Possibility of linkage among databases

Linkable to other person databases through anonymised personal number.

Linkage

Possibility of linkage among databases

Linkable to other person databases through anonymised personal number.

Linkage

Possibility of linkage among databases

Linkable to other person databases through anonymised personal number.

Linkage

Possibility of linkage among databases

Linkable to other person databases through anonymised personal number.

Linkage

Possibility of linkage among databases

Linkable to other person databases through anonymised personal number.

Linkage

Possibility of linkage among databases

Linkable to other person databases through anonymised personal number.

Linkage

Possibility of linkage among databases

Linkable to other person databases through anonymised personal number.

Linkage

Possibility of linkage among databases

Linkable to other person databases through anonymised personal number.

Data quality

Entry errors if applicable

Household structure is not evident for the small part of the entire population; imputation of household structure, using Labour Force Survey information.

Breaks

Methodological break: improvement in the method by using household-information from income tax declarations from 2011 onwards.

Consistency of terminology or coding used during collection

Terminology is consistent in time.

Data quality

Entry errors if applicable

Household structure is not evident for the small part of the entire population; imputation of household structure, using Labour Force Survey information.

Breaks

Methodological break: improvement in the method by using household-information from income tax declarations from 2011 onwards.

Consistency of terminology or coding used during collection

Terminology is consistent in time.

Data quality

Entry errors if applicable

Household structure is not evident for the small part of the entire population; imputation of household structure, using Labour Force Survey information.

Breaks

Methodological break: improvement in the method by using household-information from income tax declarations from 2011 onwards.

Consistency of terminology or coding used during collection

Terminology is consistent in time.

Data quality

Entry errors if applicable

Household structure is not evident for the small part of the entire population; imputation of household structure, using Labour Force Survey information.

Breaks

Methodological break: improvement in the method by using household-information from income tax declarations from 2011 onwards.

Consistency of terminology or coding used during collection

Terminology is consistent in time.

Data quality

Entry errors if applicable

Household structure is not evident for the small part of the entire population; imputation of household structure, using Labour Force Survey information.

Breaks

Methodological break: improvement in the method by using household-information from income tax declarations from 2011 onwards.

Consistency of terminology or coding used during collection

Terminology is consistent in time.

Data quality

Entry errors if applicable

Household structure is not evident for the small part of the entire population; imputation of household structure, using Labour Force Survey information.

Breaks

Methodological break: improvement in the method by using household-information from income tax declarations from 2011 onwards.

Consistency of terminology or coding used during collection

Terminology is consistent in time.

Data quality

Entry errors if applicable

Household structure is not evident for the small part of the entire population; imputation of household structure, using Labour Force Survey information.

Breaks

Methodological break: improvement in the method by using household-information from income tax declarations from 2011 onwards.

Consistency of terminology or coding used during collection

Terminology is consistent in time.

Data quality

Entry errors if applicable

Household structure is not evident for the small part of the entire population; imputation of household structure, using Labour Force Survey information.

Breaks

Methodological break: improvement in the method by using household-information from income tax declarations from 2011 onwards.

Consistency of terminology or coding used during collection

Terminology is consistent in time.

Data quality

Entry errors if applicable

Household structure is not evident for the small part of the entire population; imputation of household structure, using Labour Force Survey information.

Breaks

Methodological break: improvement in the method by using household-information from income tax declarations from 2011 onwards.

Consistency of terminology or coding used during collection

Terminology is consistent in time.

Data quality

Entry errors if applicable

Household structure is not evident for the small part of the entire population; imputation of household structure, using Labour Force Survey information.

Breaks

Methodological break: improvement in the method by using household-information from income tax declarations from 2011 onwards.

Consistency of terminology or coding used during collection

Terminology is consistent in time.

Applicability

Strengths:
The data provides full coverage of the Dutch population, has great linkage and is also in time. Data provided is also of high quality.
Weaknesses:
The registry uses the de jure population and has a separate estimate of the illegal population.

Applicability

Strengths:
The data provides full coverage of the Dutch population, has great linkage and is also in time. Data provided is also of high quality.
Weaknesses:
The registry uses the de jure population and has a separate estimate of the illegal population.

Applicability

Strengths:
The data provides full coverage of the Dutch population, has great linkage and is also in time. Data provided is also of high quality.
Weaknesses:
The registry uses the de jure population and has a separate estimate of the illegal population.

Applicability

Strengths:
The data provides full coverage of the Dutch population, has great linkage and is also in time. Data provided is also of high quality.
Weaknesses:
The registry uses the de jure population and has a separate estimate of the illegal population.

Applicability

Strengths:
The data provides full coverage of the Dutch population, has great linkage and is also in time. Data provided is also of high quality.
Weaknesses:
The registry uses the de jure population and has a separate estimate of the illegal population.

Applicability

Strengths:
The data provides full coverage of the Dutch population, has great linkage and is also in time. Data provided is also of high quality.
Weaknesses:
The registry uses the de jure population and has a separate estimate of the illegal population.

Applicability

Strengths:
The data provides full coverage of the Dutch population, has great linkage and is also in time. Data provided is also of high quality.
Weaknesses:
The registry uses the de jure population and has a separate estimate of the illegal population.

Applicability

Strengths:
The data provides full coverage of the Dutch population, has great linkage and is also in time. Data provided is also of high quality.
Weaknesses:
The registry uses the de jure population and has a separate estimate of the illegal population.

Applicability

Strengths:
The data provides full coverage of the Dutch population, has great linkage and is also in time. Data provided is also of high quality.
Weaknesses:
The registry uses the de jure population and has a separate estimate of the illegal population.

Applicability

Strengths:
The data provides full coverage of the Dutch population, has great linkage and is also in time. Data provided is also of high quality.
Weaknesses:
The registry uses the de jure population and has a separate estimate of the illegal population.