Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Sydney Airport: waiting for a (financial) crash landing

Warning - this post has a major error - explained in this later post. Sorry.

The Macquarie acquisition of SydneyAirport through its satellite vehicle – Macquarie Airports – is perhaps the seminal infrastructure deal of our times.

It was by the leading acquirer of infrastructure in the world (Macquarie Bank).

It had a private equity type structure – Macquarie did it on someone else’s balance sheet and ripped out enormous fees.

An absolutely enormous sum was paid – and was roundly criticised at the time as these 2002 press reports indicate here and here and here and here.

It was in Macquarie’s home town (Sydney) and so was super-visible.

Australian mums and moms and pops were the ultimate holders of the risk – so the high levels of visibility and the bad press mattered,

It was geared with an amount of debt that meant that the debt holders were taking large (possibly insane) risks for minimal returns (something which is reminiscent of the entire private equity boom).

What is more – the acquisition for about a billion dollars more than the number 2 bidder – was unequivocally a winner.Traffic and hence revenue went up.Funding costs went down and the large amount paid seemed to drop into distant memory.

Macquarie runs a mean-lean-profit machine

There is little doubt Macquarie ran the airport well.They hired uber-public servant Max Moore Wilton to run the place – and he did his political duty (scotching all sorts of regulatory interference – and a possible competing second airport).He also lived up to his public service moniker “Max the Axe” and ran the place as a lean profit machine.

When Bethany McLean wrote her piece on Macquarie she praised SydneyAirport’s profit ethos:

… so, about a month later, I arrived at Australia's Sydney Airport - which is owned by a Macquarie fund - during the early-morning rush hour, groggy after a long flight.

If you did the same thing, you might trudge through customs, not noticing much, perhaps, beyond the A$4 - gasp - it costs to hire a luggage trolley. But if you took the time to explore, you would realize that the airport is not a run-of-the-mill ripoff but an eerily efficient moneymaking enterprise.

You don't have to go far out of your way to buy souvenirs or coffee, because the airport's owners have studied how far you'll be willing to deviate from your path (five meters). You might buy a duty-free item not because you want one, but because doing so will shoot you into a special, speedy customs line. And should you drive to the airport, you would discover that parking your car in the shade ("the premium shaded parking product") costs an extra A$4.

Not that all this efficiency lessens the irritation that some users experience. As I shut the door of my cab, the driver begins an unsolicited rant about the fees he has to pay to wait at the airport. "Macquarie Bank owns it," he says. "They own too much."

Bethany was right.SydneyAirport has been run brilliantly – and there is no more old public service culture fat to take out.They have done it.

It was SydneyAirport more than any other deal that justified the validity of the “Macquarie Model”.

Macquarie Airports has booked its profit

All of this says that Macquarie’s seemingly overpriced 2002 purchase was in fact a bargain.That is why this – the highly controversial and visible purchase - is the seminal infrastructure deal of our time.It showed just how much public infrastructure run as “an eerily efficient money making enterprise” is worth”. The success of the Sydney Airport was lauded by countless (and possibly mindless) imitation.

Macquarie however – being the leverage junkie it is – borrowed vastly more money (approximately $2 billion) against the airport and paid a massive dividend to Macquarie Airports (the listed trust/ultimate owner).This debt – like most debt in most Macquarie vehicles has limited recourse – it has recourse only against SydneyAirport and no other assets.

Given that Macquarie Airports (MAP) has received in cash more than they paid in cash and they can’t be forced to make good SydneyAirport debt then MAP has made a profit.A big one – and a real one - one that can't be reversed.Even if SydneyAirport were to go bust tomorrow it would have been on OK deal – at least assessed on a standalone basis.MAP holders will have done OK.Banks and other guarantors would have done their dough – but that is them.Those are the joys of non-recourse finance.

So what is left at SydneyAirport?

The short answer is a very well run airport and a lot of debt.Here is the balance sheet:

You can calculate the debt according to your own definition of debt.Maccqaurie picks a lower number because they think the fixed coupon subordinate (the SKIES) are equity.(That is funny given their name: Sydney Kingsford-Smith Income Equity Securities.)

And here is the P&L.

Yes it did lose 182 million last year!

Note in the P&L the operating profit (ie before depreciation) is only 10 million larger than the interest bill.After even basic maintenance capex the airport is cash-flow negative.That is an amazing debt load.

Macqaurie runs lots of its assets this way – though SydneyAirport is the clearest example.They have run it with those sort of debt load since inception – and it has always been OK in the end because traffic and volume have risen every year.Costs have been kept (well) under control and everything has turned out roses despite negative initial cash flow. Indeed Macquarie values the equity in the loss making airport at several billion dollars on the assumption that traffic volumes increase.

But the summary is clear: SydneyAirport requires increasing traffic to be solvent - let alone be worth anything like the claimed amounts.

Is traffic increasing?

Well it has increased every year.But this year is somewhat problematic.Australia is almost the ultimate long-haul destination.North Asia is still booming so traffic volumes should be going up.But the cost of flying is going up too due to fuel and airlines are cutting flights.Further tourists generally don’t like the strong Aussie dollar.

There are plenty of press articles to that effect.See here and here and here and here.These cutbacks are all relatively recent.

So does Macquarie have another trick?

Well the biggest problem now is how well SydneyAirport has been run. Its too good.

I doubt that there is any fat left to cut.I doubt that there are many additional revenue opportunities.I could be wrong – but this looks very difficult for debt holders and guarantors in SydneyAirport.

The fall-off in air-traffic could be temporary.Air traffic has dipped before – but only for short periods.Maybe this will all blow over. If air traffic resumes its historic upward trend then this post should be ignored.

However the oil price hike looks fairly permanent. Does that make it difficult for Macquarie?Well a profit has already been made in cash on the airport.So from 8 miles high it doesn't look like a problem. From ground level - well I report - you decide.

No comments:

General disclaimer

The content contained in this blog represents the opinions of Mr. Hempton. You should assume Mr. Hempton and his affiliates have positions in the securities discussed in this blog, and such beneficial ownership can create a conflict of interest regarding the objectivity of this blog. Statements in the blog are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors. Certain information in this blog concerning economic trends and performance is based on or derived from information provided by third-party sources. Mr. Hempton does not guarantee the accuracy of such information and has not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of such information or the assumptions on which such information is based. Such information may change after it is posted and Mr. Hempton is not obligated to, and may not, update it. The commentary in this blog in no way constitutes a solicitation of business, an offer of a security or a solicitation to purchase a security, or investment advice. In fact, it should not be relied upon in making investment decisions, ever. It is intended solely for the entertainment of the reader, and the author. In particular this blog is not directed for investment purposes at US Persons.