Oliver et al v. City of Montgomery, AL et al

Filing
85

JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The US Magistrate Judge's 82 Recommendation is adopted; (2) The plfs' 81 Motion for Leave to Amend is denied; (3) The dfts' motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 16 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 28 , and 31 ) are granted; (4) All other outstanding motions are denied as moot; (5) This case is dismissed in its entirety; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the plfs, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/8/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )

-TFM Oliver et al v. City of Montgomery, AL et al (MAG+)
Doc. 85
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
BEATRICE ELAINE OLIVER, et al., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, AL, et al., Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv467-MHT (WO)
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 82) is adopted. (2) The plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend (doc. no. 81) is denied. (3) The defendants' motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 16, 19, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, and 31) are granted. (4) All other outstanding motions are denied as moot.
Dockets.Justia.com
(5) This case is dismissed in its entirety. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the plaintiffs, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 8th day of March, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.