The problem with JunkScience being back is the compelling reason to make the time to read it; not to mention the need to survive the waves of depression which sweep over one as the sheer ornery stupidity and even malicious distortion of truth is exposed in its pages.
Having just spent some time there I am off for a quiet smoke to settle me down some…

The heavily slanted rhetoric used at JunkScience.com is just plain dumb, and detracts from any exposure of truth it may contain. I am so tired of the Gore-hating, divisive BS – I just want some good, scientific information on what is going on without having to wade through somebody’s knee-jerk far right enviro-bashing. I will not read junkscience, nor will I recommend it to anyone else, and I am discouraged that Anthony supports it.

REPLY: Sorry, they have the distinction of being quite a large daily clearinghouse of information. Sometimes they throw a little humor.

The heavily slanted rhetoric used at JunkScience.com is just plain dumb, and detracts from any exposure of truth it may contain.….and they are different from the heavily “anthropogenic” biased IPCC how?