Magnetic switches could use 10,000 times less power than silicon transistors

This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

Computer engineering, but in particular mobile computer engineering, is all about playing a zero-sum game with yourself. Power and efficiency are constantly undercutting one another, creating confounding incentives for designers looking to set records for both talk time and processing speed. At this point it seems obvious that both speed and battery life are limited by the old process of laying down increasingly dense little fields of silicon transistors; whether it’s a quantum computer or a graphene chip, getting more computing power for less electrical power will require a fundamental shift in how we build computers.

A new study from UC Berkeley hopes to provide the basis for just such an advance, laying out their attempt at a silicon replacement they say uses up to 10,000 times less power than prior solutions. They have designed a system that uses magnetic switches in place of transistors, negating the need for a constant electric current. The idea of a magnetic transistor has been discussed since the early 1990s, but the idea’s downfall has always been the need to create a strong magnetic field to orient the magnets for easy switching; all or most of the power saved by the magnets is spent creating the field needed to actually use those magnets.

This new study, published last week in Nature, uses a wire made of tantalum, a somewhat rare element used to make capacitors in everything from Blu-Ray players to mobile phones. Tantalum is a good, light-weight conductor, but it has one particularly odd property that’s made it uniquely useful for magnetic applications: when a current flows through the tantalum wire, all clockwise-spinning electrons migrate to one side of the wire, all counter-clockwise-spinning to the other. The physical movement of these electrons creates a polarization in the system — the same sort of polarization prior researchers have had to create with an expensive magnetic field.

If this approach were successful and practical, we could begin to capitalize on some of the shared benefits of all magnetic computing strategies, the most glaring of which is that magnetic switches do not require constant current to maintain their state. Much like a liquid crystal in an e-ink display, a magnetic transistor will maintain its assigned state until actively flipped. This means that a theoretical magnetic processor could use far less energy than semi-conducting silicon ones by accruing energy savings whenever it is not actively doing work. And since tantalum is a fairly well-known material, its incorporation into the manufacturing process shouldn’t prove too difficult.

Raw tantalum.

One interesting thing about this ability to maintain an assigned state is that it essentially makes the chip itself programmable. Where silicon transistors must be laid down physically for each specific function, magnetic switches could be reoriented by software to meet a specific need. Decoding video is a very different process than rendering out that same video in a real-time graphics engine, and the two processes use distinct arrangements of physical transistors. A magnetic chip could theoretically change its arrangement on the fly, presumably in response to software commands, to better suit itself to the particular task at hand.

So, magnetic transistors offer a way out of the zero sum game in which increased power necessarily hacks off battery life, and decreased power consumption requires a slower overall speed. The real-world power of a chip made of magnetic-switches will of course be limited not by science but by manufacturing — making experimental transistors is nice, but ultimately meaningless if we can’t churn out thousands of such chips on relatively short notice.

Though distinct in many ways, these transistors still use the same basic on-off logic as regular transistors, so they’d need a comparable production standard to compete in terms of raw speed. My Nexus 5 boasts a 28-nanometer Snapdragon chip that packs four high-speed cores onto a chip the size of a graham cracker; though magnetism has its advantages, it’s likely that silicon will continue to reign for a very long time to come.

Tagged In

Wow, this would make the ultimate FPGA (field programmable gate array). It’d also completely change design paradigms as the chip would take commands to morph depending on the application then take commands to execute said application.

Guest

But what happens when a device using this type of chip comes in contact with a magnetic field generated by a common household object such as a stereo receiver?

Adam J. Vergon

But what happens when a device using this technology comes in contact with a common household item (such as a stereo receiver) that emits an electromagnetic field? Wouldn’t that cause all transistors to immediately flip to an opposite state?

Matt Menezes

Well, you’d have to shield the device.

Moving magnetic fields induce current in computers’ wires, so if a magnetic field’s source or the computer itself are moving, you’ll run into issues. Also, a magnetic field could corrupt data on a conventional HDD.

Antoine Talbot

Exactly, we will have to shield the device. But most devices are already shielded by a faraday cage anyway; The metal case of your desktop, the thin sheet metal inside your plastic laptop, the 2 sheet metal plate you see in the PS4 etc… Those pieces are already in place to protect your devices from EM field to a certain extent.

Michael Walsh

Ah great, yet another article showing possible future PC tech that we COULD use but can’t for another 15 – 20 years because of the price and difficulty of manufacturing. Great, so along with graphene PC components (e.g. 300Ghz 64 core CPU’s and 100 Terflop GPU’s), optical tech (like 100 times faster than PCI and no latency) and Quantum computers we have magnet powered transistors that we MAY look forward to in the future. By the time any of this tech is even in it’s beta stage of production I will have settled down and had kids. Getting peoples hope up much?

pixelstuff

This article is for the one 15 year old that will read it and become inspired by the idea, spend the next 15 years of his life studying it, and then finally as he turns 30, will figure out how to mass produce the concept and become the next billionaire.

Just think, without this article we might have never seen the technology replace the stalled and maxed out transistor technology.

DevaintDamien

Well you are talking to him right now and he is 16 years old. In order to mass produce this they need to incorporate dynamo theory or moving compressed mass by having a larger mass to do so due to gravity or basically magnetism and free radicals being attracted to the larger mass which has more free radicals to create an electron chain thus momentum would be greater and so would torque thus creating reverse opposite polarization as seen on earth magnetic field poles and it all spirals put from the the compressed mass this is also occurs in blackholes

standard

This is precisely the kind of article I love, and why I return to your site.
A glimpse into new branches of tech being discovered and explored.
Thank you.

mike m

The article fails to mention that Tantalum is a conflict mineral.

This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

ExtremeTech Newsletter

Subscribe Today to get the latest ExtremeTech news delivered right to your inbox.

Email

This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our
Terms of Use and
Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletter at any time.