Endgame by Megadeth. The is video tribute the band that shows us the New World Order and the FEMA camps. Dave Mustane founded Megadeth after former band Metalica kicked him out fro drinking iruic since it is Mike Hetfrild that really has the problem. Mustane went back to LA and started the LA thrash Metal Band Megadeth. The are a household name anong Metal fans,
They have had 8 grammy nominations and have not won, because the grammies are not fair.
Mustane has always been a patriot and has never backed down, My video takes the same aproach and I think it would be the kind of vision he is trying to get us to see. There is a lot about the Fem and UN death Camps and New World Order Conspircies, amd even the UFO cover up and Aliens.
I;ve talked with people whi have met him and he really is just as ccol and down to Earth as he is in interview.

As a follow-up to my previous post (Jan. 31) regarding WN’s and leadership, it should be noted that not only are WN’s the only ones who are capable of providing sound leadership in today’s world, WN’s are in fact leading white societies (and perhaps, by extension, the entire world). Until just a few years ago, and for much of the last century, white societies were lead by individuals antithetical to the WN position. But their leadership (they are still trying to lead) was in the direction of the destruction of white societies and the white race, was fraught with unnaturalness and falsehood, and was a contrived leadership rather than a natural leadership since it was based upon force and intimidation. In any event, WN’s are presently leading the white world (and perhaps the entire world), and this in spite of the fact that there are very few WN’s in formal leadership positions. However, in today's world, occupying formal leadership positions is largely irrelevant to actual leadership due to the freer communication made possible by the internet. (Infomation flow is noted further below.) This freer communication is a main reason why WN's are the present leaders of white societies (and perhaps the world). Admittedly, it would be desirable for WN's to occupy formal leadership positions because this would likely reduce lag-time between a course being set and that course being followed, but occupying such positions is not absolutely necessary.

In recent years, increasing numbers of people in white societies who are not WN’s – mainly, at present, non-WN whites – are following the WN lead. . . are moving closer to the WN position. The impetuses for this are two-fold.

First, exposure to the results of a large degree of Jewish influence in white societies and to the primary manifestation of this large Jewish influence – this primary manifestation being an increase in the proportion of non-whites in white societies – and the experience of the results of this increase in the proportion of non-whites in white societies is causing many non-WN’s to move closer to the WN position. This is occurring independently of any effort on the part of WN’s. Instead, and ironically, this is occurring as a result of the efforts of those who most oppose WN’s. At any rate, for the most part, these non-WN’s are not moving closer to the WN position because they consciously agree with the WN position. Rather, it is out of intuitive self-interest.

Second, the freer flow of information from WN’s to others made possible by the internet (mentioned above) - and by the existence of fine information outlets within the internet, such as Stormfront - is also causing many non-WN’s – mostly non-WN whites – to move closer to the WN position. (And causing numbers of non-WN whites to become WN’s) This freer flow of information has allowed WN’s to explain their position directly to others. Prior to the internet, the WN position was “explained” to the public by individuals who were hostile toward whites and particularly hostile toward WN’s. (This is still being done by way of information outlets controlled by the previous leadership.) Anyway, many non-WN’s, as a result of being much better informed about the WN position, are following the WN lead. Another result – and an important result – of the more widely publicized expressions of WN viewpoints by WN’s has been that this has and is reducing the fear on the part of many whites of expressing the same or similar viewpoints, and this reduction of fear is also accelerating the movement of many whites to stances at or near the WN position.

The problem in this present situation, though, is lag-time – the delay between the time at which WN’s lead in a certain direction and the time at which the rest of the white world goes in that direction (mentioned above). And there is still a great deal of momentum in the movement of white societies in the destructive direction set by the previous leadership. So, it’s a question of how long a time there is between WN’s setting a course and the white world shifting to that course and how much further damage to white societies will be done in the interim.

I am more optimistic about the future of whites than pessimistic. But bringing about a positive future for whites will require a lot of work on the part WN’s.

Stormfront's Derek Black Launches A Twice-Weekly Pro-White Radio Program On WPBR-AM In West Palm Beach

Derek Black's radio show now expanded to two hours.

Derek Black, the son of Stormfront webmaster Don Black, has launched a twice-weekly radio program which airs on WPBR 1340 AM in West Palm Beach, Florida. The program will air live each Tuesday and Thursday, 9:00 to 11:00 AM EST. It will also be archived online as podcasts afterward. More information on this Stormfront thread.

Derek Black formerly hosted four one-hour weekly shows on Stormfront Radio, so he has experience. The difference here is that WPBR is a broadcast news/talk radio station with a significant local audience, so Derek will face the challenge of keeping the program relevant to the local audience as much as possible.

Went really well. Derek's intro music is "Ride of the Valkyries" fading into Merle Haggard's "I'm a White Boy." Guests Gordon Baum of the CofCC, James Edwards of Political Cesspool and me. An agreeable Haitian caller. And, of course, a couple of Spartie's infamous commercial spoofs ("I'm sorry, folks. Nobody else will advertise on my show.")

The station's main website was down all morning for some reason, so not many people heard the webstream, and our only copy of the show is a cassette recorded by the station, which we've now got to convert to an MP3. We'll have an archive maybe tonight.

Derek Black is better known for his continuing battle with a local Jewish Republican official, Sid Dinerstein. Dinerstein refused to allow Black to be seated after he was elected as a committee member in 2008; Black is filing a lawsuit.

Hear Derek Black’s new radio program now being broadcast on WPBR-AM news/talk radio!

Derek Black Launches a Twice-Weekly Radio Program on WPBR-AM in West Palm Beach

By Anchorage Activist

Derek Black, the son of Stormfront webmaster Don Black, has launched a twice-weekly radio program which airs on WPBR 1340 AM in West Palm Beach, Florida. The program will air live each Tuesday and Thursday, 9:00 to 11:00 AM EST, call in number is (561) 533-6134, the program will also be archived online as podcasts afterward. For more information see this Stormfront thread.

Derek Black formerly hosted four one-hour weekly shows on Stormfront Radio, so he has experience. The difference here is that WPBR is a broadcast news/talk radio station with a significant local audience, so Derek will face the challenge of keeping the program relevant to the local audience as much as possible.

Here is some input regarding the outcome of the first show on February 9th from Don Black himself:

“Went really well. Derek’s intro music is “Ride of the Valkyries” fading into Merle Haggard’s “I’m a White Boy.” Guests Gordon Baum of the CofCC, James Edwards of Political Cesspool and me. An agreeable Haitian caller. And, of course, a couple of Spartie’s infamous commercial spoofs (“I’m sorry, folks. Nobody else will advertise on my show.”)

The station’s main website was down all morning for some reason, so not many people heard the webstream, and our only copy of the show is a cassette recorded by the station, which we’ve now got to convert to an MP3. We’ll have an archive maybe tonight.”

Derek Black is better known for his continuing battle with a local Jewish Republican official, Sid Dinerstein. Dinerstein refused to allow Black to be seated after he was elected as a committee member in 2008; Black is filing a lawsuit.

It is an untexted, no teleprompter, face to face, heart to heart conversation from me to whomever is willing to watch and listen.

In it you will see his excerpts of my debate with Wolf Blitzer, and in it I will frankly talk about my controversial past and the beliefs I actually hold rather than those ascribed to me by the controlled media. In the process, I think this video is perfect to help those new to the Movement understand the basics of what we are all about. I strive to make a warm connection with the viewer by imagining during the whole conversation that I am talking to a person I just met and introducing him to the issues at hand.

I send this to some of my very moderate relatives and they all seemed to like it very much. So, hopefully, you will find it valuable to link or play for those people in your life that you want to have a better understanding what it is all about.

Best to All! — David Duke

PS, be sure to wait until it has fully processed to download and then upload to your sites. It is a HD file and the processing will take quite a while! Enjoy!

The SPLC just ran a story quoting me (accurately!) that nationalist patriots seek to "bridge between implicit and explicit White politics". Here's the full article as it appears on the SPLC website. Laws against defamation and libel are strong enough that even the enemy camp has to seriously consider quoting people accurately. And sometimes they do. The $PLC quotes one of my blog posts right here in this SF blog. I'll copy that post below the SPLC article.

Print This Post Are the organizations that make up the Tea Party movement fundamentally racist? If not, are they too lackadaisical about addressing hard racist elements among their overwhelmingly white memberships?

Controversy over these questions was recently sparked anew when Ben Jealous of the NAACP accused Tea Party leaders of not sufficiently repudiating bigoted rhetoric and imagery in Tea Party events and online forums. As if to prove Jealous’ point, Mark Williams, the bilious former leader of Tea Party Express, popped up to post an online missive that fit his habit of throwing racially charged insults (he once called Barack Obama an “Indonesian Muslim turned welfare thug”). Williams’ rebuttal to Jealous’ challenge, posted to his personal blog, marktalks.com, took the form of a fictional letter to Abraham Lincoln sent from “the Coloreds,” in which the latter claim to “have taken a vote and decided that we don’t cotton to that whole emancipation thing.”

To its credit, the National Tea Party Federation, the movement’s umbrella group, responded quickly by expelling Williams. But this welcome move does not settle the matter of Tea Party racism. Williams remains active in the Tea Party Express, one of the nation’s largest Tea Party groups, and the diffuse nature of the movement makes it difficult if not impossible to gauge Williams’ support among the grassroots that has over the last year heartily welcomed Williams to dozens of Tea Party events around the country.

Whatever Williams’ official expulsion signifies—a genuine sign that Tea Party leaders will no longer tolerate bigotry from activists who work under the Tea Party banner, or simply a realization that it has an image problem on its hands—the fact remains that the Williams kerfuffle was hardly the first instance of racist rhetoric emanating from Tea Parties. From homemade signage to racist email blasts, there has been plenty to condemn dating back to April of 2009. Much more often than not, this racist behavior has generally been met by Tea Party activists with either silence or denial.

The most notable example of this silence and denial is the complete lack of recognition that white supremacist groups increasingly view Tea Parties as rich recruiting grounds. The average Tea Partier may not be interested in joining a hate group, but hate groups have not been shy about their interest in the average Tea Partier. For over a year, racist groups have lurked on the periphery of the Tea Party scene seeking to exploit the fact that, as MSNBC commentator Pat Buchanan recently noted with satisfaction, “For the first time in our lifetimes, outside the South, white racial consciousness has visibly begun to rise.”

Take, for example, the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC). The descendant of the pro-segregation Citizens Councils of the 1950s, the CCC is a proudly racist organization. Its literature and website on occasion still display its original motto: “States Rights. Racial Integrity.” Its newspaper and website trade loudly in crude racist tropes, inveigh against interracial marriage and immigration, and make common cause with far-right, virulently anti-immigrant political parties around the world.

Because the group is so blatantly racist, it is hard to imagine any movement that claims mainstream credibility—one representing the concerns of “everyday Americans”—having any tolerance for the CCC. One would expect such a respectable movement to chase the CCC out of its events. Its message of hate is, after all, at odds with the Tea Party’s professed inclusive message of deficit reduction and smaller government.

And yet, at a Tea Party attended by this reporter last January in Inverness, Fla., the CCC set up a prominent information booth from which it handed out literature for more than three hours. At no point did a single attendee of the rally, which featured a line-up of state-level GOP candidates and politicians, challenge the presence or ideology of the CCC. The following day, the organization had good reason to be pleased with its reception and deemed the event a success. According to the CCC blog, the organization’s representatives “passed out 2 boxes of THE CITIZENS INFORMER newspaper, and 250 Council business cards.” No arguments ensued.

The Inverness event was not the first time a Florida chapter of the CCC had worked a Tea Party event and later boasted of its easy reception. “[Council] receives warm welcome in Crystal River, Florida,” declared the CCC site following its presence at a Tea Party on Sept. 12, 2009. “Council members distributed 3 boxes of The Citizens Informer and applications,” the site explained without mentioning any conflict or opposition from the gathered.

Tolerating the presence of the Council of Conservative Citizens does not mean that everyone at these events is a racist. But the lack of opposition to the presence of CCC recruiters suggests that the NAACP is correct: the Tea Parties are, at best, far too tolerant of extremist groups in their midst. At worst, there is an unspoken ideological affinity. Whatever the case, the presence of the CCC highlights how explicitly racist hate groups like the CCC seek to exploit the Tea Party movement to expand their own white nationalist movement.

This strategy is no secret. Jamie Kelso of American Third Position (A3P), a white nationalist group that describes itself as “a political party for white Americans,” has even discussed its intricacies with Hatewatch. According to Kelso, groups like A3P and CCC work off the assumption of a symbiotic relationship between Tea Party groups that are “implicitly white” — defined as a group that has almost entirely white memberships but does not openly discuss race — and more marginal groups that openly discuss race and thus are “explicitly white.”

Early on, Kelso developed an upbeat take on the Tea Parties’ susceptibility to the white nationalist message. After a May 16, 2009, rally in Southern California, he wrote in a blog post: “Every time I yelled ‘We want our country back!’, I am sure that 99% of the 99% White crowd that responded so enthusiastically to that chant UNDERSTOOD that the ‘we’ and the ‘our’ in ‘we want our country back!’ was (and is) our White people. … I’m also sure that this army of Minutemen had some very good implicit (and explicit) understanding of WHO stole their country from them and their children.’”

“Everyone accepted our literature and we received enthusiastic responses from most takers,” an A3P organizer wrote of another event, adding, “It is crucial that we network at implicitly white activities such as Tea Parties and Euro festivals.”
The challenge, as Kelso sees it, is to get Tea Partiers to make the leap from attending a Tea Party event to joining a full-fledged hate group. That’s where the conversations and free literature come into play. “The word is bridge,” Kelso told Hatewatch. “I’m a bridger. That’s what I’ve been doing all along.”

The expulsion of Mark Williams was a good start to cleaning the Tea Party house. But it will be up to Tea Party leaders and activists to keep up the work. Unless the Tea Party leadership and grassroots begin to take much stronger—and regular—stands against haters who aim to recruit from, or infiltrate, their ranks, their denials of racism will ring even more hollow than they already do.

-------------------Below is the SF blog post that the $PLC quotes in their July 27, 2010 report on the connection between the Tea Party movement and the American Third Position and other explicit White groups.

Quote:

Jamie Kelso's May 19, 2009 Blog Post
On A 10,000-person Tea Party in Corona, California
- quoted in $PLC Report of July 27, 2010

Below is the full post that I put up on White patriot forums on May 19, 2009, and that the $PLC quotes in their July 27, 2010 article. I snapped the panorama photo in the post that you see, stitched together from four photos. The crowd was too huge to be seen in one photograph. We were in Corona, California, which is in Orange County. The American Third Position had not yet been created when this Tea Party erupted on May 16 in Southern California.

Panorama of the Mass Patriot Rally
May 16, 2009 at Corona, Southern California

Sometimes the MOST obvious thing about a scene is very easy to overlook. Also, I always like to remember Marshall McLuhan's observation that "the medium is the message". Well, every single one of the more than 10,000 patriots saw one thing that was MOST obvious....we were (for all intents and purposes) ALL White! Now, Southern California is probably about 45% White right now. So...how come our patriot rally crowd here is 99% White? Check the faces, arms, and White hands in these photos for yourself.

Well, now we get to Marshall McLuhan's observation that "the medium is the message". The medium that your own eyes are seeing in these photos, and that we all saw in person as well, is an EVENT comprised of over 10,000 White very angry White folks who all spent their whole Saturday driving into the hills of Corona (a fair drive for many of them) to roar, wear angry slogans, wave revolutionary flags and signs, and be seen in public as fighters. So what is the message of such a medium? Even though this message was never spoken from the stage? (But yours truly got to shout it over the top of the whole crowd, so as to be heard and responded to by the whole crowd about twenty times). The message of this medium was (and is): "We (White people) want our country back!"

"We want our country back!"

Every time I yelled "We want our country back!", I am sure that 99% of the 99% White crowd that responded so enthusiastically to that chant UNDERSTOOD that the "we" and the "our" in "we want our country back!" was (and is) our White people. And I'm sure that 99% of that 99% White army of Minutemen (and that's just what it is) simultaneously and implicitly understood the word "back" that they were so enthusiastic about to mean that they realize that somebody stole their country from them. And they intend to take it back. I'm also sure that this army of Minutemen had some very good implicit (and explicit) understanding of WHO stole their country from them and their children. Does it get any better than this? Is what we've been hoping for here? I would answer no and yes to those two questions.

And, lastly, completing the message of this medium, this 99% White roaring muster of more than 10,000 understood the word "country" to mean the entire universe of ideas that the word country commonly represents to any people: their nation, their culture, their neighbohoods, their schools, their jobs, their happiness, their peace, their well-being, their future, their children, their comrades, their language, their faith, their history, their heritage, their borders, their government, their media, their savings. In short...EVERYTHING of life or death importance to them in their lives!

The Ron Paul Connection

Oh, I forgot to mention the Ron Paul connection. Ron Paul Revolutionaries were throughout this "muster" of White Minutemen. The Ron Paul Campaign for Liberty had a tent and tables laden with Ron Paul signs, DVDs, shirts, and literature. I should have had someone take a photo of the huge Ron Paul sign I had hoisted at the front of the crowd, right at my camera position. And the most important and obvious thing was not the many Ron Paul signs. The important thing was the REACTION of all the people in this huge crowd to Ron Paul's name....they love the "Thomas Jefferson of our time". In this crowd, the best conversational opener with anybody in the sea of handsome White folks (a large percentage of whom were our beautiful White ladies!) was a big smile accompanied by the utterance of the now-universally-understood words "Ron Paul!". You know that something good is happening when the crowd that musters is: a) huge; b) 99% White; c) full of families with children; d) attended by a representative ratio of men and women, young and old, affluent and scraping-by; e) literally ROARING, and; f) acting OVERJOYED to be roaring TOGETHER as a FAMILY.

If my memory serves me correctly during the late 80's or early 90's I saw read at least one article in the Spotlight which mentioned that the current Pope had been a Zyklon B salesman during WWII??? I have not seen anything further about this anywhere since and would like to be able to find and read this similar stories again if possible.

I alway enjoyed reading the Spotlight very much thank you for all the years of honest work in pursuit of the truth.

That's really hilarious for a number of reasons.
* He was born 1920 Making him 19 to 25 during WW2, no relevant studies, no connection. Does anybody really believe he'd be employed by IG Farben?
* The camp got their stock of Zyklon B directly from the factory. Degesch I think, since it was a standard product for delousing.
* If he'd really supplied them with Zyklon B, Karol Wojtila would actually saved people's life, because it was used to prevent disease.
* I just recall that he worked for some chemical plant for a while. But that's as close as it gets.