> But why you refer to Debian/FSO? Is the arm repo mainteined by the FSO
> team?
no.
but fso has it's own life independent of debian -- otoh debian on fr makes
only sense when using fso.
> OM does not use FSO?
not yet.
it is supposed to be the next step (internally) -- but afaik the 200X.Y
tagged distributions do not use it.
> Im kind lost on all terminology...
well, it _is_ a bit confusing, but the wiki has at least one page
explaining the different terms and their relationships.