On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:38:46 -0400
"Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Francisco Reyes wrote:
> > Norberto Meijome writes:
> >
> >>> I do not have Windows on any of my machines but I have heard that
> >>> Win4BSD is really good. It is not free! I believe it is about
> >>> $45.
> >>
> >> $45 is far cheaper than EMC's VMWare workstation edition. Does it
> >> support Vista
> >> now? interesting..you can also try QEMu, on which Win4BSD is partly
> >> based .
> >
> > Win4BSD is not all that stable and the support is rather lacking. You
> > see many posts in their forums with no answer.. and others with
> > answers weeks/months later.
>> besides it doesn't work on amd64
I didnt know all this. thanks! QEMu will have to keep working for now ;)
btw, does QEMU work ok under 64bit?
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Law of Conservation of Perversity:
we can't make something simpler without making something else more complex
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.