Before you read this article...

This is a site that promotes allowance of anyone to write what they feel like. The purpose is to promote overall freedom of expression despite ideological indifference.

Please take a moment to consider writing on this site for the promotion of overall internet freedom. No personally identifiable information is collected when registering and no money is made. This site only survives from the personal ideology of anonymous users and liberty with zero donation.

While it is true that almost 90% of americans support some kind of background check. Laura was referring to the claim that 90% want increasedbackground checks.

This was debunked

the Washington Post poll only asked would you in be in favor of a law for background checks. Not whether they would favor increased background checks

A poll commissioned by the National Shooting Sports Foundation found when respondents were informed by the questioner that most gun show purchases already fall under the background checks support for additional background check requirements plummeted.

O’Reilly’s statement refers to a landmark case on gun District of Columbia vs. Heller. the Supreme Court found that Washington’s gun regulations — essentially amounting to a ban on handguns in the home — were unconstitutional.

Before the case it appeared in the federal court of appeals for the D.C. where Garland has been a judge

Garland didn’t vote on this case at all.

In response to "Do you think health care in Massachusetts is working?" the poll found that 38 percent said yes 49 percent said and 13 percent were undecided.

While it’s obviously not HUGE it is clear that the majority of people did not support it

So once again PolitiFact was caught making things up in order to make Fox News look bad. Just comes on the heels how about a presidential election where PolitiFact was caught smearing one of the presidential candidates as well.