'''Massimo Pigliucci''' is a [[science|scientist]], [[philosophy|philosopher]], and prominent critic of pseudoscience. He is a professor at SUNY-Stony Brook and holds three Ph.D.s: one in genetics from the University of Ferrara, one in botany from the University of Connecticut, and one in philosophy from the University of Tennessee. He has debated [[creationism|creationists]] and [[apologetics|Christian apologists]] including Kent Hovind and Duane Gish. He regularly writes for 'Skeptical Inquirer' and 'Philosophy Now.'

+

{{wikipedia}}

+

'''Massimo Pigliucci''' is a [[science|scientist]], [[philosophy|philosopher]], and prominent critic of [[pseudoscience]]. He is a professor at SUNY-Stony Brook and holds three Ph.D.s: one in genetics from the University of Ferrara, one in botany from the University of Connecticut, and one in philosophy from the University of Tennessee. He has debated [[creationism|creationists]] and [[apologetics|Christian apologists]] including [[Kent Hovind]] and [[Duane Gish]]. He regularly writes for ''[[Skeptical Inquirer]]'' and ''[[Philosophy Now]]''.

−

Pigliucci has criticized [[Richard Dawkins]] for claiming to be able to scientifically refute the existence of [[God]] in a broad sense. Pigliucci's view is that there is strong evidence against specific versions of the God hypothesis, but that when taken in a broad sense, God is a [[falsifiability|non-falsifiable]] hypothesis.

+

Pigliucci has criticized [[Richard Dawkins]] for claiming to be able to scientifically refute the existence of [[God]] in a broad sense. Pigliucci's view is that there is strong evidence against specific versions of the God [[hypothesis]], but that when taken in a broad sense, God is a [[falsifiability|non-falsifiable]] hypothesis.

Pigliucci has criticized Richard Dawkins for claiming to be able to scientifically refute the existence of God in a broad sense. Pigliucci's view is that there is strong evidence against specific versions of the God hypothesis, but that when taken in a broad sense, God is a non-falsifiable hypothesis.