Facebook Impostor

I was recently notified that somebody set up a Facebook account in our name without our permission:

https://www.facebook.com/Aryanism.net?fref=ts

This might be tolerable if he at least presented our views properly (in which case I would simply contact him to establish official connections), but as can be clearly seen, he doesn’t even understand them. For all those who have seen the page before, there is absolutely no connection between us, and it will stay that way.

But my point is that he’s probably not like that. He’s not serious about what he’s saying, he’s just saying them to mock us.

However, he fails in mocking us because he is a retard who doesn’t understand what he is mocking. Take this example from one his posts:

‘Nothing wrong with wanting to keep your colors .. but remember make sure your partner is not retarded. You need to observe more than skin to color to figure out if your partner is superior.’

So, he’s mocking us by saying ‘Nothing wrong with wanting to keep your colours’, which I assume is a statement he knows we’re against. He then says ‘remember make sure your partner is not retarded. You need to observe more than skin to color to figure out if your partner is superior’. This part of the dialogue is an attempt to express our view that quality rather than ethnicity is what matters in a simplistic-sounding way in order to portray us as idiots. Now, he either 1) genuinely believes that we are concerned primarily with intelligence, like Social Darwinists are or 2) knows we disapprove of Social Darwinism but is portraying us as Social Darwinists to anger us, in the same way as he portrayed us as the sort of people who would say ‘nothing wrong with wanting to keep your colours’ to try to anger us. I believe the first option is true since, judging by the spelling and grammar on his page, its presentation, and the nature of the project itself, I don’t think he has the intelligence to do the second option. Therefore he is a retard.

>Is this all that guy talks about. He even calls Aryanism a “Eugenic movement”

I don’t have any problem with Aryanism being referred to as a ‘eugenic movement’. I know AS recommends distinguishing between Aryanisation and Eugenics, but I think what he calls ‘Aryanisation’ and ‘Eugenics’ should just be thought of as two different schools of Eugenics. It seems inconsistent with his preference for assigning meanings to words based on etymology, considering ‘eugenics’ comes from ‘eu’ (good) and ‘genos’ (race). In what sense do we NOT want to create a good race? The difference between these two schools is their view on what constitutes a good race, not whether they want to create a good race.

I mean, I honestly don’t get this website sometimes. It’s plastered with swastikas and images of Hitler, but we aren’t supposed to use a word like ‘eugenics’. Why? Because it might offend leftists who potentially want to join us? I mean what the fuck?

i agree with Alex Alexander. Nationalism, National-Socialism, Aryanism or whatever one may call it, MUST be a complete ideology, not a mutilated one.
race and eugenicism are, of course, important. but there are other important issues, just like zionist supremacism, geo-politics, democracy dictatorship, economics, culture, tradition, history etc, etc

i’m Portuguese by the way, i’m running a blog and i have the some problem, there are some weirdo brazilian guys that are WN (White Nationalism or White Power) trying to infiltrate my agenda, all they talk is race, race, race, and they can’t even distinguish Aryan from White (they don’t even know what an Aryan is!). for they, there are only two categories of people in this world: ‘Whites’ and ‘Non Whites’. that’s ridiculous man!!
and to make things worse, they don’t even understand nothing about race or genetics but still think they are very clever.
they even say Mussolini was a ‘Non-White’ or ‘mestizo’ (facepalm!)
as i shut them up and tell them to change subject and talk about other things, their tiny brain take things personally and they insult me because they think i’m tring to ‘avoid’ the subject for being myself a ‘Non-white’!

all this morons do, is call ‘Non-white’ or ‘mestizo’ to EVERYBODY but they! in Stormfront is exactly the same shit. boring and anoying discussions about who is ‘White’ and ‘Non-White’ (word Aryan is never used) and people insulting each other.
when this freak ‘nationalism’ will be completely banned?
this isn’t even ‘nationalism’. this is hollywood ‘neo-nazi’ stuff, White Power, neocon, imature and judaized ‘nationalism’.

@Thor – I completely agree that ‘Nationalism, National-Socialism, Aryanism or whatever one may call it, MUST be a complete ideology, not a mutilated one’. I didn’t mean that I would be happy for Aryanism to describe itself as a movement BASED on eugenics. I was just taking the opportunity to point out that I would be happy for Aryanism to be a movement that openly SUPPORTS eugenics.

I recommend everyone with a facebook account to report the page for racism. Facebook gets rid of these pages fast and it has only been up for a month so it won’t be a blight on the movement for too long.

Please do not be so naïve comrades. The eye of Sauron is getting ready to focus on all of you. Did we think that we could passively sit by and contemplate authentic National Socialist ideology until our dying day, peacefully in our own corner of the internet? I don’t know about all of you, but my true aim has always been to manifest National Socialism into this world, and Aryanism, ever since I was drawn to this site for the truth that it speaks.

Hashtali chose me to be a propagandist on youtube, I have taken this task seriously. My propaganda stretches way beyond youtube however, I work so many back channels it would make most of your heads spin. Hashtali chose the right person for the job, he needs to be appreciated for this fact.

Folk, your innocence is beautiful, but you are deceiving yourselves. The eye of Sauron is turning toward you.

The struggle is coming…

@Hashtali, can you please change my name to ‘Numinous Sun’, and give the Hakenkreuz back to me in my ‘blog’ avatar, thank you kindly.

I have been playing this game for quite some time now folk, answer me this, of all the pictures I posted on the ‘imposters’ Facebook page, why is the following image the only one he did not click ‘Like’ on?

“I have been playing this game for quite some time now folk, answer me this, of all the pictures I posted on the ‘imposters’ Facebook page, why is the following image the only one he did not click ‘Like’ on?”

it was pointed out that “eugenics” is the canonical term that Galtonism used to describe itself. It was also pointed out that authoritative Galtonists such as Madison Grant rejected National Socialism as a eugenic movement. I agree with Grant, and because authentic National Socialism is the political dimension of Aryanism, it follows that Aryanism cannot be a eugenic movement either. The rest of my response will explain why Grant is correct.

“It seems inconsistent with his preference for assigning meanings to words based on etymology, considering ‘eugenics’ comes from ‘eu’ (good) and ‘genos’ (race).”

The “eu-” in “eugenics” is also found in “euthanasia”. Why is death in combat for a noble cause – surely one of the best ways to die! – not euthanasia? For the same reason, Aryanization is not eugenics. If you look up the etymology of “euthanasia” in older dictionaries published when standards of literacy were higher, “euthanatos” is translated as “EASY death”. The Greek “eu-” refers not to MORAL good but merely to EXPEDIENT good (this is why moral government was referred to as “aristocracy” and not “eucracy”).

A “eugenos” is a “good” race in the sense that it is an EASY race: a race that finds it easy to survive under natural selection. Hence eugenics etymologically refers to the practice of creating a race that finds it easy to survive under natural selection. This is in line with Galtonism, which begins with the premises that: 1) civilization obstructs natural selection; 2) eugenics means artificially exerting selective pressure similar to that which natural selection would have generated in absence of civilization.

Aryans find it generally DIFFICULT to survive as a race under natural selection (hence our perception of life as “kampf”), due to our lack of self-interest. Therefore Aryans are absolutely not a “eugenos”, and Aryan blood would in fact be eliminated by eugenics. In contrast, Jewish blood would be favoured by eugenics.

“The Jew offers the most striking contrast to the Aryan. There is probably no other people in the world who have so developed the instinct of self-preservation as the so-called ‘chosen’ people. The best proof of this statement is found in the simple fact that this race still exists.” – Adolf Hitler

If any race is a “eugenos”, it would be Jews. That’s why they call themselves “chosen”: natural selection (ie. Yahweh) chooses them every time. This is also why early 20th century Jews supported eugenics: because they were confident that eugenic policies would racially favour Jews (who have higher average IQ than non-Jews, and would be capable of better average performance than non-Jews in any Galtonist test). Consistent with this, many Galtonists were admirers of Jewry, considering Jewish racial history to have been eugenic for Jewish blood, such as by raising their average IQ (I agree with this). Hence Zionism, not Aryanism, is a eugenic movement. Aryanism, which is anti-Zionist, is necessarily anti-eugenic also.

“In what sense do we NOT want to create a good race? The difference between these two schools is their view on what constitutes a good race, not whether they want to create a good race.”

No. There can be different schools of eugenics depending on divergent views on which traits make it easiest for a race to survive under natural selection, and there can be different schools of Aryanization depending on divergent views on which traits are most noble. But to claim that Aryanization is a school of eugenics is equivalent to claiming that Jesus is Yahweh. A “good race” in the moral sense is an oxymoron in our worldview, since a race (which by definition reproduces, and therefore is violent to the unborn who do not choose to be born) cannot be morally good in absolute terms. The best a race can be is noble, by recognizing this predicament and seeking a solution to it.

Furthermore, as you already know, we biologically value neoteny. Taken to its logical conclusion, Aryanization will ultimately lead to neoteny to the extent that further reproduction is no longer physically possible. Therefore Aryanization DOES NOT WANT to create a “good” race (implicitly generation after generation without ending); what it wants is to reach the last generation of all.

“Yahweh created man in His own image, in the image of Yahweh created He him; male and female created He them.” – Tanakh

“When you make the male and the female one, so that the male will not be male nor the female female; and when you fashion eyes in place of an eye, and a hand in place of a hand, and a foot in place of a foot, and a likeness in the place of a likeness; then will you enter the Kingdom.” – Jesus

It’s an attempt at suicide by proxy; a behavior whereby the subject engages in consciously life threatening and/or dishonorable behavior to the degree that it compels someone to conscientiously respond, with deadly force.

@AS
>Therefore Aryanization DOES NOT WANT to create a “good” race [...] what it wants is to reach the last generation of all.

This gave me chills, the good kind. To just imagine the peace and tranquility when the last human transcends this universe is just so beautiful and out of this world. It gives me a feeling of what nirvana is like. Man oh man is Aryanism cool.