April 14, 2010

Tea Party supporters are wealthier and more well-educated than the general public, and are no more or less afraid of falling into a lower socioeconomic class, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.

The 18 percent of Americans who identify themselves as Tea Party supporters tend to be Republican, white, male, married and older than 45.

And I bet, on average, they are, relative to the general public, more into golf than professional wrestling.

This is surprising news for anyone who believes the self-serving false stereotypes that the left has saturated us with. I'm a bit surprised that the NYT would shout news that contradicted their beliefs.

All the truth will do, if it sinks in at all, is change their attack plan from "Teabaggers[sic] are toothless ign'ant racists" to "Teabaggers are rich, privileged exploiters, terrified that they won't be able to oppress blacks and hispancs in the new minority majority America."

Figuring out that tea partiers are smarter and higher income than average should have been easy. To a good approximation, only people who pay federal income tax care about federal income taxes. Only people with decent health insurance are afraid of politicians breaking it. Those criteria alone exclude about the bottom 50% of Americans. Combining that with the fact that politically active people tend to be smarter and higher income than the apathetic, and the news should be obvious. Hell, the near total absence of blacks is pretty solid evidence of the demographics.

"Tea Party supporters tend to be Republican, white, male, married and older than 45."

In other words, the adult part of country. The population that pays taxes, votes, and keeps the country safe.

Of course we're accused of racism: the Left wants to either important illegals to take our jobs or they want quotas to displace us. If that's not enough, they'll tax us to death.

There once was a consensus that personally conservative white men -- from Eisenhower to the young Robert Kennedy -- were the core of the country and that the country needed them to lead in battle, whether serving as a general or a lowly NCO; and the country -- from women to blacks -- needed these men to lead major corporations, law firms, and in the halls of government.

The Left declared war on this core demographic of our country and the Tea Party folks know it and are protesting it. It's not that the Tea Party folks are racist but they're revolting at the Left's war against them. Hence, the necessity of the Left to smear them as racists.

"Mark Potok discusses the recent explosion of right-wing Extremism in an interview with Terry Gross on NPR's Fresh Air this week. The interview came amid a wave of Vandalism and threats of violence aimed at members of Congress who voted for Health Care reform legislation. The SPLC recently released "Rage on the Right," its annual count of active hate and extremist groups in the U.S. The report documented a surge in Extremism as militias and other groups steeped in wild,..."

Throughout the interview, Gross and Potok repeatedly mention the "Tea Party" within the context of anti-semitism, white racism and right-wing extremism without any particular connection. At times, Potok actually denies any specific connection with the Tea Party but continues to raise it's name alongside child molesters and wife beaters.

It's curious how frequenly they use this tactic to smear the Tea Party without any actual damming facts. Potok is just chasing dollars, but leftwingers like Gross are clearly hypnotized and paranoid by a deep seated and irrational fear "the other".

Is racism or other -isms of the left the only significantly hateful -ism permitted today?

All the truth will do, if it sinks in at all, is change their attack plan from "Teabaggers[sic] are toothless ign'ant racists" to "Teabaggers are rich, privileged exploiters, terrified that they won't be able to oppress blacks and hispancs in the new minority majority America."

It has already happened!

If you read the posts on major newspaper websites, like Washington Post, you can see the "message of the day" being circulated by shills from both sides almost in real time. Today, I noticed the overnight shift from the meme "Tea Party = racists" to "Tea Party = tool of David Koch & Dick Army"

The 18 percent of Americans who identify themselves as Tea Party supporters tend to be Republican, white, male, married and older than 45.

Exactly. They're basically just ordinary Republicans masquerading as a new political movement. That's why the "Tea Party" movement is such a farce. These are the same people who supported Bush, now running around screaming about government spending and increased government interference in daily life - the same things they voted for in 2004.

The NYTimes comments on the article were vivid examples of North East elitism. Most repeated the charge that Tea Party members were racist - of course without any evidence from the poll other than that most tea partyers were white.

I say go to town. If all white people have the term racist thrust upon them no matter what their behavior, then the word will have no more punch than a drudge report reader sputtering "Liberal".

i suspect many liberal activists are positively obsessed with painting the modern tea party participants as racists. this is their main weapon against conservatives and they want to use their best weapon as early and as effectively as possible.

here is foxnews and their article on jewish agitator jason levin, an oregon teacher, who is naturally, like a large segment of the jewish population, absolutely driven to damage and destroy things like the modern tea party movement:

http://tinyurl.com/y547yef

his tactic of course is to have people pose as tea party members, and then act like racist imbeciles in view of the media.

it's kind of funny to see just how predictible the jewish angle is on this kind of thing, when you know to look for it. 50% of these people are jewish, in a nation that is today, probably below even the old 2% jewish figure which has been used for decades.

And besides, the most damning criticism of the Tea Party is that they weren't in the streets 5 years ago, when there was still a chance that they could have made a difference. Now its just too damn late.

"He has said he would seek to embarrass Tea Partiers by attending their rallies dressed as Adolf Hitler, carrying signs bearing racist, sexist and anti-gay epithets, and acting as offensively as possible — anything short of throwing punches."

I wonder to what degree Levin and his followers (if indeed, he has any) are interested in this project just so that they can say racist, sexist, and anti-gay things in public.

his tactic of course is to have people pose as tea party members, and then act like racist imbeciles in view of the media.

This type activity is noticible on Face Book.

There many British pro and anti-BNP groups/pages there. Some of the groups themselves are false flag operations designed to show the BNP in a bad light and entice in pro-BNP commenters to identify them.

While in other, apparently genuine, groups people voice all sorts of badly written abusive racist, non-PC language about vibrant minorities. I strongly suspect some of these are also false flag types trying to tarnish the BNP.

Im sure the reverse happens too but its hardly front page news to hear SWPL type tolerant liberals demanding a political party be banned and its memebers beaten up and killed.

Here's the Google Wallet FAQ. From it: "You will need to have (or sign up for) Google Wallet to send or receive money. If you have ever purchased anything on Google Play, then you most likely already have a Google Wallet. If you do not yet have a Google Wallet, don’t worry, the process is simple: go to wallet.google.com and follow the steps." You probably already have a Google ID and password, which Google Wallet uses, so signing up Wallet is pretty painless.

You can put money into your Google Wallet Balance from your bank account and send it with no service fee.

Google Wallet works from both a website and a smartphone app (Android and iPhone -- the Google Wallet app is currently available only in the U.S., but the Google Wallet website can be used in 160 countries).

Or, once you sign up with Google Wallet, you can simply send money via credit card, bank transfer, or Wallet Balance as an attachment from Google's free Gmail email service. Here'show to do it.

(Non-tax deductible.)

Fourth: if you have a Wells Fargo bank account, you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Wells Fargo SurePay. Just tell WF SurePay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). (Non-tax deductible.)

Fifth: if you have a Chase bank account (or, theoretically,other bank accounts), you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Chase QuickPay (FAQ). Just tell Chase QuickPay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address (steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). If Chase asks for the name on my account, it's Steven Sailer with an n at the end of Steven. (Non-tax deductible.)

My Book:

"Steve Sailer gives us the real Barack Obama, who turns out to be very, very different - and much more interesting - than the bland healer/uniter image stitched together out of whole cloth this past six years by Obama's packager, David Axelrod. Making heavy use of Obama's own writings, which he admires for their literary artistry, Sailer gives the deepest insights I have yet seen into Obama's lifelong obsession with 'race and inheritance,' and rounds off his brilliant character portrait with speculations on how Obama's personality might play out in the Presidency." - John Derbyshire Author, "Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics" Click on the image above to buy my book, a reader's guide to the new President's autobiography.