At 11:00 PM 4/7/2010 +0530, Amit Sethi wrote:
>I am trying to create a module for the docutils . I wish to install
>it docutils.writer.something
Is that a documented, official way to extend docutils? If not, and
docutils.writer is not a namespace package, then you should not be doing that.
>I have docutils installed at
>/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/docutils-0.6-py2.6.egg
>on my ubuntu machine but when I tried to install it create a seperate
>package called docutils and saves
>the package in that ? How do I tell a package that this particular
>package is a subpackage of a library
>the setup.py of the package looks like :
> license='Public Domain',
> packages=['docutils.writers'],
> package_dir={'docutils.writers':'docbook'},
> scripts=['rst2docbook.py']
The correct way to do this is to NOT list packages or package_dir;
just use py_modules = 'docutils.writer.docbook', and have a
docutils/writer/docbook.py file. This will install it in a
distutils-compatible way, but not a distribute-compatible or
setuptools-compatible way.
Really, this is not a well-supported scenario in any case -- it is to
be avoided if at all possible. Installing your code into other
people's packages is a bad way to extend them. (Setuptools and
Distribute offer better ways of providing extensibility, such as
namespace packages and entry points.)