Katherine Heigl: Ballbusting bigot?

Most people who hate Katherine Heigl hate the actress because she seems like a bit of a diva, or because she keeps appearing in annoying rom-coms, including one with Ashton Kutcher that hurts my head when I even think about it. The fellas at Register-Her.com have another reason: she hates balls. As in, testicles.

I can’t cut the nuts off human men … yet. So, I’ve dedicated my time to the neutering of dogs, cause that’s legal.

The joke here, as any rational person can plainly see, isn’t that cutting off balls is inherently hilarious. The joke is that an actress with a reputation as a diva is basically doing her critics one better by portraying herself as a deranged, narcissistic, supremely creepy ball-hater. And she’s spoofing her own bad reputation for a genuinely good cause: reducing cat and dog overpopulation and therefore the number of unwanted animals that are put to death in our nation’s animal shelters.

The actress’s willingness to endorse male targeted sexual mutilation betrays a bigoted indifference to sexual violence, and justifies her inclusion on this registry in the category of bigot.

Presumably the fellas at Register-Her will next go after the people who have posted the more than twenty thousand YouTube videos that feature dudes getting hit in the nuts. Surely these videos, which feature actual violence against actual human balls are a far graver threat to the balls of the world than even Katherine Heigl.

The Register-Her Action Squad might start by tracking down the (admittedly quite ingenious) ball-hating dudes involved in this video.

And then move on to all the ball-hating bigots featured here:

And here are 50 more:

Better track down the ghost of Scott Joplin, too, for providing the music to the last one from beyond the grave.

Why does it surprise people that 5’7 was considered average only a few centuries ago? Because the average height has been increasing rapidly over the past few hundred years. More rapidly than normal evolution can account for.

I’ve heard tell that better nutrition might have something to do with it.

The only way this could happen is if women had been ascribing to a calculated program of heightist eugenics over the generations. But that couldn’t be true, could it?

I think it meant that men were rightly perceived as the lords and heads of their households and also the entire world. Especially if they were white. (Although if you suggested that men today could wear heels, you’d be forcing our fine upstanding men to be all girly, which, what are you, some kind of ball-breaking harpy?)

I think it’s telling that so many people think Napoleon was short, when he was actually the average height for his time. Why does it surprise people that 5’7 was considered average only a few centuries ago? Because the average height has been increasing rapidly over the past few hundred years. More rapidly than normal evolution can account for. The only way this could happen is if women had been ascribing to a calculated program of heightist eugenics over the generations. But that couldn’t be true, could it?

Not quite. Due to the problems caused by malnutrition, the average height for a lower on the socioeconomic scale man was much shorter then it is now (about four inches shorter.) However a child of moderate to affluent wealth did not have the same problems as a poor person would in terms of food which means the person would be taller then the total average (which is why Henry VIII was 6’3″ per his suit of armor.)

also, Arks, you said CONSCIOUS genocide. That means you aren’t just doing that bizarre “women don’t know what they want, they are hypergamous but don’t know it, so don’t trust anything they say on the matter, I’m right and nyahnyah”

i was gonna go all law geek and explain how even if everything arks said were true, he still doesnt understand what genocide is, but then i got a little bit of perspective, so instead i’m gonna say that i just watched the so-called ‘very best nut shots compilation’ and i dont believe that all of those are nut shots. this is intolerable.

Does this mean, say Masai and/or Dinka women are the most genocidal on earth, or that Aka and/or Aeta women are the least hypergamous? Tallest and Shortest groups, yet anthropologists are SILENT! Conspiracy! CONSPIRACY!!!

(Aeta women also do a large part of the hunting in their tribes, so it’s possible they just tamed the small males. Further research needed, but given the state of feminized anthropology)

That they do not find a joke funny doesn’t mean that it wasn’t a joke.

It is unfortunate that people are way too sensitive about jokes being told today.

I do not believe that Katherine Heigl wishes to chop off my balls anymore than I think a guy really wants to abuse women when he tells the “what do you tell a woman with two black eyes” joke using a redneck character voice.

I should also note that penis size has been increasing at the same rate as height over the years, which I somehow think is less related to nutrition than it is for women selectively choosing only the most cervix jackhammering of alpha dicks. I would love to see what the human race looks like in 100,000 years time. I’m picturing something like gorillas, with huge males twice as large as the females in their harems, only with dongs the size of trash cans.

So what about the Dinka genocidal females, or aeta women? Why are they so tall and small? Would this be an anthropological data point or not? Or maybe this is all a lot more complicated? Say it aint so!

I should also note that penis size has been increasing at the same rate as height over the years = possibly proportionality, if true? Also, citation for this?

I should also note that penis size has been increasing at the same rate as height over the years, which I somehow think is less related to nutrition than it is for women selectively choosing only the most cervix jackhammering of alpha dicks.

I should also note that penis size has been increasing at the same rate as height over the years, which I somehow think is less related to nutrition than it is for women selectively choosing only the most cervix jackhammering of alpha dicks.

Arks, you’re hilarious.

I would love to see what the human race looks like in 100,000 years time. I’m picturing something like gorillas, with huge males twice as large as the females in their harems, only with dongs the size of trash cans.

So … women haven’t been getting taller too? Your world is weird, Arks.

MRAs seem to have this idea that divorces always go one way:
-Wife is a stay-at-home mom. Husband is wealthy, loving and loyal.
-Wife decides for Mystery Woman Reasons to divorce husband for no reason.
-Wife is awarded all the husband’s money.
-Wife is awarded a giant alimony and child support, which she actually receives.
-Wife is awarded full child custody.
-Wife and children obtain restraining orders against husband.

I don’t think guys like NWO have any conception that divorce courts actually don’t work like that most of the time.

— Wife is a stay-at-home mom, having given up on her PhD to put Husband through his. Husband is bipolar, leading to unpredictable outbreaks of frantic rage. Husband also gets fired frequently. Family is poor.
— After fourteen years of “trying to make it work,” Wife divorces Husband.
— Wife and Children obtain restraining orders against Husband because he is violent. Daughter #1, especially, is terrified of him.
— Wife goes back on the job market, which fails at first due to (1). Family is even poorer. Wife, now known as Mother, begs door to door for food sometimes, but Children only hear about this a decade later.
— Husband contests the child support and hires a lawyer. Wife, who has no money to buy food, let alone hire a lawyer, is forced to act as her own attorney. Did you know that much of New Mexico law is still in Spanish? Fortunately, Wife’s degree, back when she was getting one, is in linguistics and she is fluent in Spanish.
— After several horrible court fights, Wife is awarded full custody, despite Husband’s best efforts to have her declared incompetent.
— At some time during this period, Wife undergoes several micro-strokes from stress.
— Wife is also awarded child support, most of which Husband never pays.

“I’m not saying tall bitches are tall on purpose, but they usually wear monster heels, yet another FUCKING example of women using whatever they can to exert dominance on ARROGANTthey are ARROGANT. in my opinion they should be banned from heels for people or at least BITCHES over 5’4″

Do you feel better after that little ragey keyboard smash?

OK, again, tall women aren’t out to get you. Most of them probably aren’t even aware that you exist. Women wear heels mostly because it makes our legs look nice. Nothing to do with dominance, especially over you in particular, since most women don’t even know you.

Ark, if you’re not serious, we really have the same kind of humor, and bravo.
If you are serious, thanks for the laugh anyway.

The fact that people are getting taller is related not only to their food (both quantity and quality), but to the progress of medicine and the diminution of child work. Why is why, maybe among other reasons, kids are often taller than both their parents. (something that selection of the tallest wouldn’t explain)
Also, genocide, you should invest in a dictionary. And since you have internet, that’s free. Hint: it implies the actual killing of people, not having with more attractive people. If Hitler had said, “hey, Germans, aren’t tall blond blue-eyed people sexy? We should all try to mate with them”, that wouldn’t have been a genocide.
Also, heredity. It doesn’t work like you think. A girl doesn’t get just her mother’s genes, or a boy his father’s. Every baby get half from each.

Humans are glorified vehicles for genes. So when a woman refuses to sleep with a man, she is symbolically killing him. Her neglect is directly responsible for the death of his genetic legacy, no different from a mother who lets her children starve to death. When put in place on a cultural/global scale, it becomes genocide.

And yes, a man only passes on half his genes to his children, that’s why humans always arrange themselves into harems. Men realise early on that they’re stronger than women, and stronger than some other men, so they murder the other men and take all the women for themselves. Of course there’s laws against murder these days, but there are nonviolent and legal ways of asserting dominance that get used instead.

Arks, that anthropology thing I’ve mentioned a few times in this thread? Do you know that it’s a real thing? That there are all sorts of human societies in the world doing all sorts of things, and you can read about them in papers and books? Anyway…

“Humans are glorified vehicles for genes. So when a woman refuses to sleep with a man, she is symbolically killing him. Her neglect is directly responsible for the death of his genetic legacy, no different from a mother who lets her children starve to death.”

— Wife is a stay-at-home mom, having given up on her PhD to put Husband through his. Husband is bipolar, leading to unpredictable outbreaks of frantic rage. Husband also gets fired frequently. Family is poor.
— After fourteen years of “trying to make it work,” Wife divorces Husband.
— Wife and Children obtain restraining orders against Husband because he is violent. Daughter #1, especially, is terrified of him.
— Wife goes back on the job market, which fails at first due to (1). Family is even poorer. Wife, now known as Mother, begs door to door for food sometimes, but Children only hear about this a decade later.
— Husband contests the child support and hires a lawyer. Wife, who has no money to buy food, let alone hire a lawyer, is forced to act as her own attorney. Did you know that much of New Mexico law is still in Spanish? Fortunately, Wife’s degree, back when she was getting one, is in linguistics and she is fluent in Spanish.
— After several horrible court fights, Wife is awarded full custody, despite Husband’s best efforts to have her declared incompetent.
— At some time during this period, Wife undergoes several micro-strokes from stress.
— Wife is also awarded child support, most of which Husband never pays.

You do realize, do you not, that 90% of marriages involving a bipolar spouse of EITHER Sex result in divorce??? Bipolar women are particularly notorious for their infidelity and initiating divorces because the commitment required by marriage is just “too much” for them to handle. Besides, the outcome turned out legally in favor of the woman(assuming this yarn has some basis in fact).

The thing about bipolar peeps is that they are exceedingly manipulative. I’m saying this because I have known quite a few of them in my lifetime. A lot women really don’t know what they want so they act on their emotional impulses. Bipolar guys are usually pretty good at playing to a woman’s emotions and that’s how women end up in situations like this. Better make sure that you acquire a useful skill in college before hitting the job market…..A degree really doesn’t entitle you to anything.

“The thing about bipolar peeps is that they are exceedingly manipulative. I’m saying this because I have known quite a few of them in my lifetime. A lot women really don’t know what they want so they act on their emotional impulses. Bipolar guys are usually pretty good at playing to a woman’s emotions and that’s how women end up in situations like this.”

So, my relationship with my own turned out to be bipolar, friend for much of my life, later husband, later abusive, stalking, etc spouse, was me not knowing what I want and acting on an emotional impulse. Ah. This whole “you need to just KNOW that you’re being manipulated and the guy is bad news” stuff basically demands psychic powers and a crystal ball.

Also, I was close friends with the guy starting at 15 years old, started dating him in senior year. That’s some long-range manipulation. Sure, I guess I “didn’t know what I really wanted” at eight-frickin-teen. Come on dude, quit laying down “this is why the social problem x occurs” based on “knowing lots of x people” – You’re gonna keep running into reality and people who have every reason to take issue with your sage pronouncements.

I think it meant that men were rightly perceived as the lords and heads of their households and also the entire world. Especially if they were white. (Although if you suggested that men today could wear heels, you’d be forcing our fine upstanding men to be all girly, which, what are you, some kind of ball-breaking harpy?)

The effeminacy of white european aristocratic men in bygone centuries has always disgusted me. I think it was very wise of American culture to break with this tradition, as most of Europe eventually did so in the 19th century. But given the fact that faggoty european aristo’s where wearing high heels and tights, NO WONDER white men felt the need to strictly forbid white women to consort with men of color(especially black men) who at the time where far more masculine in their ways! Heels aren’t just for looking taller, they emphasize a woman’s legs(especially her calves)and make her booty stick out. And that’s why men think women look sexxxay wearing them.

The partial or complete removal of female sexual agency. There’s a reason why we had institutions of marriage, or fathers and brothers controlling their daughters choices for most of history and it’s because unrestrained female sexuality is detrimental to civilisation. When women are given the freedom to pursue their own desires they instinctively act in ways that undermine the structures of society. Their partner choice is both irresponsible and destructive and ruins things for everyone.

Removal of human rights is a touchy subject these days, but think about it. Would you give your 10 year old a bowie knife? Would you hand a drunk man the keys to your car? Then why would you give women control over their own lives?

Zhinxy- well, clearly sleeping with all those poor menz is right out, as then you’d be a slutty slut slut. Perhaps humans should choose to evolve parthenogenesis, the same way we choosed to have men evolve into tall, huge-penised mutants.

Humans are glorified vehicles for genes. So when a woman refuses to sleep with a man, she is symbolically killing him. Her neglect is directly responsible for the death of his genetic legacy, no different from a mother who lets her children starve to death. When put in place on a cultural/global scale, it becomes genocide.

What if I (a woman) have sex with a guy, but I’m on birth control?

What if I have sex with a guy, but he wants to wear a condom because he doesn’t want to have children with me?

What if I have sex with a guy for years, and I’m on birth control because he doesn’t want kids, and then he has a baby with his next girlfriend?

What if I have sex with a guy who has two children and doesn’t want anymore?

What if I have sex with a guy, get pregnant, and he convinces me to get an abortion?

Have I killed all those men? Or that’s only if I hadn’t had sex with them at all.

What if I refuse to sleep with a man, but then he rapes me? That’s OK because then his genetic legacy didn’t die?

What if I gave a guy a blow job? Dear lord … I ate his children!!!

And yes, a man only passes on half his genes to his children, that’s why humans always arrange themselves into harems. Men realise early on that they’re stronger than women, and stronger than some other men, so they murder the other men and take all the women for themselves. Of course there’s laws against murder these days, but there are nonviolent and legal ways of asserting dominance that get used instead.

Really???? Humans always arrange themselves into harems? How so?

Also, if a man passes on half his genes to his children, how are women going to stay small while men grow to twice their size? Humans are only slightly sexually dimorphous.

Are you one of those MRAs who think that only 10% of all men ever get laid? Sounds like it. Hey, why don’t you use one of those nonviolent and legal ways of asserting dominance you’re going on about and see how it works for you? Is one of those nonviolent and legal ways of asserting dominance not hating women and treating women like they’re people? Because that’s kind of the common element among guys I tend to want to have sex with.

“I’m a bit biased here because I can’t walk in heels at all and hate them deeply. But hey, as I’m a 5’1″ person who doesn’t wear heels, MRAL ought to love me, because I am extremely humble and gracious in letting even average-size men tower above me!”

I actually am dominant in the way I relate to men (if I find them attractive), and I’m only 5ft2! My love of heels probably balances out the good feminist karma created by Holly’s loathing of them, though.

But really, think about how irrational you’re being, MRAL. Here you have three actual genuine castrating feminist bitches (Kristin, Holly, and me), and we’re both tiny. Do you think we’re less able to boss you around because we’re tiny? Meanwhile, we have a hypothetical woman who’s 5ft10, and not remotely feminist. In fact, let’s imagine she’s really old fashioned, like one of the Duggars. Which woman is going to be more inclined to be dominating towards you? Why do you feel more threatened by, and why?

You better start working on whatever is going on mentally/emotionally that makes you assume women who make you feel insecure are out to get you soon, before you turn into Arks.

Speaking of Arks…women’s “slobbering crotch maws” are to blame for the fact that taller men do better in terms of their careers? How so? Unless the career in question is actor (clearly not the case, since most actors are tiny), model, or gigolo, I’m not seeing how that’s supposed to work.

(Are we sure Arks is for real? He’s almost too full of batshit misogynist lunacy to be real. Maybe he’s actually a feminist grad student doing some sort of performance art.)

I wish we could post pictures directly. I’m sure there’s a nice trophy or mug reading “UNDERSTATEMENT OF THE YEAR” I could award here.

The partial or complete removal of female sexual agency.

Okay, obviously you’re a trolly troll, but really now?

All I can say is try it. Fucking try it. Have your gender war. It’ll be like a thousand angry dudes tops (most of them unwilling to participate if it means showing their faces, much less genuine risk) against just about every husband, boyfriend, father, brother, uncle, best friend, and decent man out there. Nobody’s going to be willing to play “boys vs. girls” with you, so sorry.

Also, by the way, there’s this thing called a “couple” people tend to assort themselves into. The “alpha males with harems” thing doesn’t occur all that often in nature (especially when you’re out of college, but even then, really, people still date and marry regular). This is fairly obvious to anyone with even minimal participation in human society.

Removal of human rights is a touchy subject these days, but think about it. Would you give your 10 year old a bowie knife? Would you hand a drunk man the keys to your car? Then why would you give women control over their own lives?

Well, presumably, you’re talking about women who are (a) not 10 years old, and (b) making decisions other than whether to drive drunk. So there’s that.

(Are we sure Arks is for real? He’s almost too full of batshit misogynist lunacy to be real. Maybe he’s actually a feminist grad student doing some sort of performance art.)

This … I actually buy. Arks, are you a feminist grad student? Are you a class of feminist grad students doing a project? We won’t judge; you can tell us.

“Humans are glorified vehicles for genes. So when a woman refuses to sleep with a man, she is symbolically killing him. Her neglect is directly responsible for the death of his genetic legacy, no different from a mother who lets her children starve to death. When put in place on a cultural/global scale, it becomes genocide.”

” So when a woman refuses to sleep with a man, she is symbolically killing him. Her neglect is directly responsible for the death of his genetic legacy”

You make it sound like there are no women in the world having sex with anyone. If you don’t have sex with one woman, you may have sex with another. Plenty of fish in the sea you big silly.

“Their partner choice is both irresponsible and destructive and ruins things for everyone.”

Ruins things for you, you mean. My boyfriend is working hard to help pull Ireland out of the recession. I don’t think that’s ruining anything. Unless you want a recession O.o
What have you contributed to the world lately?

@ Holly “All I can say is try it. Fucking try it. Have your gender war. It’ll be like a thousand angry dudes tops (most of them unwilling to participate if it means showing their faces, much less genuine risk) against just about every husband, boyfriend, father, brother, uncle, best friend, and decent man out there. Nobody’s going to be willing to play “boys vs. girls” with you, so sorry.”

Ooo, scary. I’m sure many oppressed groups were told the exact same thing, in attempts to shame and scare them off. Hell, isn’t this precisely the narrative feminists like to use?

Fact is, the manosphere is growing rapidly. More and more men are realising that they’re being cheated, and more and more men are running out of options and desperately seeking a solution. It’s no longer a question of if the misandry bubble will burst, but when.

I give it 5-10 years tops before Occupy Stupid Whore Vaginas becomes a reality. Because we are the 80%, and taking things lying down is a woman’s job.

I give it 5-10 years tops before Occupy Stupid Whore Vaginas becomes a reality. Because we are the 80%, and taking things lying down is a woman’s job.

Even if the 80-20 thing was a reality (and it’s not, have you seriously never heard of this thing called a couple, I swear to you it still exists, some people even get married if you can imagine), even then…

Over the course of my life, I have killed all but three people on Earth! Four if you count the guy who gave me a hand job.

I know MRAs don’t like science, but the increase in human height is entirely due to nutrition, especially prenatal nutrition. Immigrant families in the U.S., regardless of ethnic background, reach average U.S. height within three generations.

Asian countries used to average shorter than the rest of the world, but that’s changing as they adopt Western-style diets. Even Japan, once the shortest industrialized nation on Earth, is getting taller. It’s a shame, because traditional Asian diets are a lot healthier overall, but I guess it does mean more Chinese basketball players.

My dad is 5’8″ because my mother actively dislikes tall men (around six feet is officially “too tall”), but my brother and I both ended up tall anyway. I had to marry this guy just to keep the genocide in check:

“Removal of human rights is a touchy subject these days, but think about it. Would you give your 10 year old a bowie knife? Would you hand a drunk man the keys to your car? Then why would you give women control over their own lives?”

Arks, honey, you can take your suggestion that my human rights be removed for the good of other people and shove it right up your ass. You know, that thing you like to talk out of.

No hellkel, don’t send Arks away, he’s funny! I know that’s probably because he’s new, but still, that’s so fun all these new crazy misogynists theory. And you don’t even need to make him admit anything, he’ll just admit things like he’s against human’s rights. How rare is that!? Please, pretty please. Or make an island with internet connection.

So when a woman refuses to sleep with a man, she is symbolically killing him.

Wouha. Thinks of the implications! Right know, I’m symbolically killing all human males! Including my boyfriend, because we use this evil thing called condoms. You know what that means, right? We beat our genes! They manipulate us into having sex but we don’t make babies! Mouhahahaha, I got rid of my dark passenger, now I’m free to live a life full of other things than baby raising!
So, are lesbians and nuns dangerous criminals? Are gays suicidal, or masochists?
Are people who adopt kids just plain stupid?

And yes, a man only passes on half his genes to his children

I mentioned that because that means girls will be taller too if we select only tall men.

that’s why humans always arrange themselves into harems.

always, really?
What about women who have several boyfriends or sex partner?

Of course there’s laws against murder these days

What do you call “these days”? Do you think those laws are bad? (sayyessayyessayyessayyessayyes)

Ooo, scary. I’m sure many oppressed groups were told the exact same thing, in attempts to shame and scare them off. Hell, isn’t this precisely the narrative feminists like to use?

So, men too angry to get a girlfriend are “oppressed” now? Nice.

Fact is, the manosphere is growing rapidly. More and more men are realising that they’re being cheated, and more and more men are running out of options and desperately seeking a solution. It’s no longer a question of if the misandry bubble will burst, but when.

Actually, though, fact is the manosphere alienates itself with its hate-rich, logic-poor positions. I love this blog, don’t get me wrong — but honestly, we don’t need to mock the MRM. The MRM makes fun of itself.

Now, if y’all would stop holding such stupid positions and concentrate on issues that men actually face, instead of issues that you pretend you face, like sadly not being able to rape with impunity and horrifyingly sometimes having to deal with women walking down the same street as you, maybe you’d actually get somewhere.

I give it 5-10 years tops before Occupy Stupid Whore Vaginas becomes a reality. Because we are the 80%, and taking things lying down is a woman’s job.

Now see, that’s what I’m talking about. Funnel some of that stupid, unproductive energy into something productive, like raising money for homeless veterans. There’s a good Arks. Run along now.

“Aren’t the whore vaginas already pretty thoroughly occupied? I mean, that’s kinda part of what makes them whore vaginas.”

I’m also thinking that the men who’re currently very much enjoying occupying them are not going to take this lying down. After all, that’s a woman’s job! It’s sure going to suck for Arks when all the alpha males, who’re currently the only men getting laid, start beating him up for trying to occupy the vaginas of their ladyfriends.

So when a woman refuses to sleep with a man, she is symbolically killing him.

Oh God. I’ve mass-murdered three billion people!

Holly,

I am on birth control

RIGHT NOW.

I’m even killing the guys I do sleep with! Dear god, the horror!!

In other news, I don’t know any human being over the age of 25 or so who thinks having one’s cervix jackhammered is something women want. Even if you’ve never hit a cervix yourself or had your own hit, you’d think the knowledge would be shared through cultural osmosis.

So is the pile of clothes near my bed. It doubled in two days! if it continues at this, it will recover the world in… about 66 days! (not counting the depth of oceans and since it’s currently 20×30 cm²)

More and more men are realising that they’re being cheated

Why just men? Aren’t men also genociding me when they don’t have sex with me? Do you think men never say “no”?

I give it 5-10 years tops before Occupy Stupid Whore Vaginas becomes a reality.

I love it when crazy conspiracy are that precise. How did you do the math?

Because we are the 80%, and taking things lying down is a woman’s job.

And a double wtf. You can’t be more than the 50%, and that’s assuming you enroll all men. the second part, I just don’t get.Is it a lady gene too?

Arks, if you are an example of the growing manosphere, I fear for the future of logic and science. You do not know how evolution works. But really, with the direction the MRM is going, historically, it can only be compared to previous hate groups. If you were really an oppressed group, you’d focus on making allies. You aren’t doing that. Maybe you should learn from how other (actually) discriminated groups gained power and focus on actual issues men face that even Feminists can, and often do, get behind. Not the ignorant screed you have here about who is fucking who.

Note, I do not actually fear for the future of logic and science from the MRM. They are far removed from anything approaching scientific discourse (as much as Toysoldier likes to pretend). There are far worse out there causing issues.

Kyrie – The 80% thing comes from the proven scientific fact that 20% of men sleep with all of the women, while 80% of men cry themselves to sleep every night.

There are rumors of a human social structure called a “couple,” in which one man sleeps with one woman, but surely this can’t be, because we know that five-somes around an Alpha male are the usual form of sex and romance, right? Certainly all of my friends and coworkers and classmates and neighbors are in five-somes, the same kind depicted and glamorized in all media.

Rumors of single women, like rumors of something called a “gay person,” are purely spurious and do not even deserve mention.

Oh, right. So that make them the 40%, and us the 60%, including presumably the army and the police (because they usually don’t like violent and sudden take over). That’s not as really as impressive or as catchy as “we are the 99%”

Can we ban Ark? He’s seriously frightening me in ways even NWO hasn’t managed to achieve.

arks is specifically who this site is designed to make fun of. david quotes people who are just as awful in his articles. as long as he’s not ruining every thread he posts in or advocating violence against specific posters he’s not likely to get banned.