The integration of natural science and spirituality is accomplished by putting consciousness into the equations of the quantized relativistic model of reality. This approach, with a quantum calculus based on the precise empirical data provided by the Large Hadron Collider, leads to the discovery of gimmel, the non-physical third form that must exist in addition to mass and energy, in order for there to be a stable universe.

Monday, July 31, 2017

IS THE BIG BANG A BIG BUST?

MORE PROBLEMS
WITH THE BIG BANG THEORY

The big
bang theory has been popular with the general public for more than half a
century, but contrary to popular belief, the simplistic idea of a universe flying
apart from a single explosion of an infinitely dense mathematical singularity
(a dimensionless point) billions of years ago has never had unanimous support
among physicists and cosmologists. The most obvious problem was that a
straight-forward regression, or running backward in time in accordance with the
general theory of relativity resulted in having stars that were older than
the universe. This was side-stepped by Alan Guth’s rapid early inflation theory
in 1981. There were other problems, and in 1989, I applied the Calculus of
Distinctions to the red-shift constant-light-speed expanding-universe big bang and
found that there were unresolved contradictions in the theory, indicating that
the universe could not have originated in a singularity explosion. I also
concluded that the universe has always existed in some form, and will always
exist. I sent my findings to Stephen Hawking in 1989 and published them in 1990,
but they were generally ignored by mainstream science. Professor Hawking responded
that my ideas were interesting, but he didn’t have time to pursue them, and he had
a problem with my assertion that time, like space, has to be three dimensional.

I am
not the only one who had (has) problems with the big bang theory. The latest
ripple comes from the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory
(LIGO). See the Daily Galaxy site: http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2017/07/the-universe-is-governed-by-cycles-ligo-gravitational-waves-are-a-signal-from-the-birth-of-the-cosmo.html?utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheDailyGalaxyNewsFromPlanetEarthBeyond+%28The+Daily+Galaxy+--Great+Discoveries+Channel%3A+Sci%2C+Space%2C+Tech.%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedburner

From
the article: “Correlated noise in the two LIGO gravitational-wave detectors may
provide evidence that the universe is governed by conformal cyclic cosmology
(CCC) which assumes that the universe consists of a succession of [big-bang] aeons,
says Roger Penrose of the University of Oxford. Penrose proposes that the
apparent noise is actually a real signal of gravitational waves generated by
the decay of hypothetical dark-matter particles predicted by CCC. Penrose
argues that a significant amount of this noise could be a signal of
astrophysical or cosmological origin – and specifically CCC.

Last month, physicists at the Niels Bohr Institute, writes
Hamish Johnston, editor of physicsworld.com, pointed out that some of the noise
in the two LIGO detectors appears to be correlated – with a delay that
corresponds to the time it takes for a gravitational wave to travel the more
than 3000 km between the [recording] instruments [of the interferometer].

First
proposed over a decade ago by Penrose, CCC assumes that each aeon begins with a
big bang and proceeds into an unending future in which the universe expands at
an accelerating rate. As this expansion becomes infinitely large, Penrose
argues that it can be transformed back into the next big bang.”

This is
a huge departure from the popular big bang theory and abandons the idea of an
absolute beginning or end. After more than 27 years, Roger Penrose, co-author
of the Penrose-Hawking Mathematical Singularity Theorems, appears to be
agreeing with some of my 1989 findings.

2 comments:

Your 1989 findings, Ed, certainly suit the cosmogony of my own 1980, mystically-inspired, ad infinitum, calculus-formula, 'Y=X(0,1,2,3,4)Squared plus One', which has already been made well known to and appreciated by you - So, this latest comment is only to serve as a generalized reiteration of much already discussed between us, both overtly and privately on your sites - I remain ever hopeful that we can eventually come into full accord on the subject in order to serve both the overriding aspirations of the Ultimate Force and Its ongoing quest for the everlasting future of humanity! IJN!

Penrose proposes that the apparent noise is actually a real signal of gravitational waves generated by the decay of hypothetical dark-matter particles predicted by CCC. Penrose argues that a significant amount of this noise could be a signal of astrophysical or cosmological origin – and specifically CCC. 1z0-1026 dumps