If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

I have posted about the MPC support being nothing more than the substitution of a fork of GMP for GMP in the past. GMP was forked by MPC's developers because GMP's developers are hostile to supporting windows and embedded systems. To suggest GCC's switch from GMP to MPC is a significant improvement in GCC is a pure lie. The two are binary compatible, so it is likely possible to compile GCC 4.5 with either one of them and not have any issues.

Honestly, I wish that Phoronix would demonstrate knowledge in the areas it reports.

See? The infection is spreading, I knew it! Next thing you know, Micro$$aft will be extending "patent covenants" to X, the kernel, gnome and more. (KDE will be exempt, since it's copying the Vista looks.)

So kill it! Kill it with fire before it's too late!

Comment

See? The infection is spreading, I knew it! Next thing you know, Micro$$aft will be extending "patent covenants" to X, the kernel, gnome and more. (KDE will be exempt, since it's copying the Vista looks.)

So kill it! Kill it with fire before it's too late!

When Gnome copies Win95 look then it's ok, so don't worry about KDE. You're funny reaction doesn't change the fact Mono is used in Gnome and it's not used in GCC, Linux, X, KDE. Kill Mono and ximians not Novell.