Friday, August 31, 2012

From Michael J. Murphy, creator of What in the World are They Spraying?, comes his second documentary focusing on the reasons for chemtrails / geoengineering, Why in the World are They Spraying? People around the world are noticing that our planet's weather is
dramatically changing. They are also beginning to notice the long
lingering trails left behind airplanes that have lead millions to accept
the reality of chemtrail / geoengineering programs. In this documentary you will learn how the aerosols being
sprayed into our sky are used in conjunction with other technologies to
control our weather. While geoengineers maintain that their models are
only for the mitigation of global warming, it is now clear that they can
be used as a way to consolidate an enormous amount of both monetary and
political power into the hands of a few by the leverage that weather
control gives certain corporations over the Earth's natural systems.
This of course, is being done at the expense of every living thing on
the planet. Also check out this great new anti-Chemtrail music video just out last week.

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

UK based indy rap promoter Charlie Sloth has teamed up with BBC to bring "Fire in the Booth," a weekly radio program featuring some really excellent underground conscious hip-hop. Above are some of my favorite recent songs from Akala, Lowkey and Mic Righteous. My compliments to these verbal assassins for killing the tracks, and my condemnation to BBC for bleeping the word "Palestine" during Mic Righteous' "Free Palestine" rap. Just uttering the word "Palestine" is enough to get you censored by Zionist media these days.

Friday, August 24, 2012

For centuries the prevailing western worldview has been built upon the
materialistic, mechanical model of Isaac Newton - a clockwork Universe composed
of separate particles of matter interacting according to precise physical laws
and existing within objective dimensions of space and time.This model has long succeeded in describing
many facets of our multi-faceted reality, but increasingly since the
revelations of Einstein and the paradigm-crushing implications of quantum
physics, Newton’s world is quietly fading from view and being replaced by a
more spiritual science.

“Up until the present, biology and physics have been handmaidens of
views espoused by Isaac Newton, the father of modern physics … These, at their
essence, created a world view of separateness.Newton
described a material world in which individual particles of matter followed
certain laws of motion through space and time – the universe as a machine … The
Newtonian world might have been law-abiding, but ultimately it was a lonely,
desolate place.The world carried on,
one vast gearbox, whether we were present or not … Our self-image grew even
bleaker with the work of Charles Darwin.His theory of evolution is of a life that is random, predatory,
purposeless and solitary.Be the best or
don’t survive.You are no more than an
evolutionary accident … These paradigms – the world as a machine, man as
survival machine – have led to a technological mastery of the universe, but
little real knowledge of any central importance to us.On a spiritual and metaphysical level, they
have led to the most desperate and brutal sense of isolation.They also have got us no closer to understanding
the most fundamental mysteries of our own being:how we think, how life begins, why we get
ill, how a single cell turns into a fully formed person, and even what happens
to human consciousness when we die.”-Lynne McTaggart, “The Field: The Quest for the Secret Force of the
Universe,” (XXIV-XXV)

Newton’s
mechanistic, mathematical model is attractive with its law-abiding, predictable
structure, but it repeatedly falls short in describing a wide array of
phenomena which “classical physics” is thus forced to deny or ignore.These include things such as consciousness,
the observer effect, the measurement problem, Heisenberg’s uncertainty
principle, nonlocality and quantum entanglement, particle/wave duality,
bilocation, telepathy, psychokinesis, clairvoyance, precognition,
out-of-body experiences, near-death experiences, ghosts, shamanic/spiritual
healing, acupuncture, prayer, the placebo effect, psychoneuroimmunology and
many more anomalies, all of which are at odds with classical physics and will
be examined in the coming chapters.

“The
world view which was changed by the discoveries of modern physics had been
based on Newton’s
mechanical model of the universe. This model constituted the solid framework of
classical physics. It was indeed a most formidable foundation supporting, like
a mighty rock, all of science and providing a firm basis for natural philosophy
for almost three centuries.The stage of
the Newtonian universe, on which all physical phenomena took place, was the
three-dimensional space of classical Euclidean geometry. It was an absolute
space, always at rest and unchangeable. In Newton’s own words, ‘Absolute space, in its
own nature, without regard to anything external, remains always similar and
immovable.’ All changes in the physical world were described in terms of a
separate dimension, called time, which again was absolute, having no connection
with the material world and flowing smoothly from the past through the present
to the future. ‘Absolute, true, and mathematical time,’ said Newton, ‘of itself and by its own nature,
flows uniformly, without regard to anything external.”-Fritjof Capra, “The Tao of Physics” (55)

The first
steps away from Newtonian physics came with Einstein’s theory (and subsequent experimental
proofs) of relativity showing Newton
to be incorrect in his view of absolute space and absolute time.Instead, both space and time have proven to
be relativistic, interrelated concepts which are now more appropriately
referred to as “space-time.”As written
by physicist Mendel Sachs, “The real revolution that came with Einstein’s
theory . . . was the abandonment of the idea that the space-time coordinate
system has objective significance as a separate physical entity. Instead of
this idea, relativity theory implies that the space and time coordinates are
only the elements of a language that is used by an observer to describe his
environment.”Einstein showed that
space and time are not absolute structures with independent a priori existence
as classical physics espouses.In fact,
space and time are relativistic and subjective, a notion which metaphysically
places them subordinate to the mind/consciousness perceiving them!The mystical implications of this discovery
are vast and will be covered in detail later, but first let’s examine
whether or not we even live in a “material” universe at all.What has modern physics discovered about
atoms, the so-called building blocks of matter?

“For two
thousand years it was believed that atoms were tiny solid balls – a model
clearly drawn from everyday experience. Then, as physicists discovered that atoms
were composed of more elementary, sub-atomic particles (electrons, protons,
neutrons and suchlike) the model shifted to one of a central nucleus surrounded
by orbiting electrons – again a model based on experience.An atom may be small, a mere billionth of an
inch across, but these sub-atomic particles are a hundred thousand times
smaller still. Imagine the nucleus of an atom magnified to the size of a grain
of rice. The whole atom would then be the size of a football stadium, and the
electrons would be other grains of rice flying round the stands. As the early
twentieth-century British physicist Sir Arthur Eddington put it, ‘matter is
mostly ghostly empty space’ – 99.9999999% empty space, to be a little more
precise.”-Peter Russell, “From Science to God”

How
can something which is 99.9999999% empty space be considered the building block
of matter? And what is the fundamental
“stuff” of the universe if not matter?If
there is almost no substance to our seemingly solid, tangible world, what
causes the illusion?German physicist Hans-Peter
Dürr keenly noted, “Matter is not made of matter.” So what is it made of?

“For a start, what we perceive to be 'physical' and 'solid' is
anything but. Science says that what we see as 'form' - people, buildings,
landscape etc. - are made of atoms. Okay, but the trouble with the 'solid
world' theory is that atoms are not solid. More than that, they are basically
empty. How can something that is not solid create a solid environment? It
can't. Atoms consist of electrons orbiting a nucleus (protons and neutrons),
but it is the proportions that tell the story. Atoms are more than 99% empty space to our human reality, yet they are
described as the fundamental building-blocks of matter - yes, 'solid' matter.”
–David Icke, “The David Icke Guide to the Global Conspiracy” (34)

“Examine
each part of the cabin. The walls are made of wood. What makes wood what it is?
A configuration of wood cells exists as a log, and each of these cells cannot
exist without a configuration of molecules. Likewise, each molecule is composed
of atoms. Each atom contains electrons, protons, and neutrons. Each atomic
particle is composed of quarks, etc., etc., etc. Everything can be broken down
into parts. Even if somehow a ‘thing’ was found that could not be broken down,
it would still have parts because if it did not, it could not be used to make
more complex things. Anything that has spatial extent requires that it has a
front, a back, a shape – different parts.At the level of atoms, the distance from one atom to another in
relationship to the diameter of the nucleus of the atom is ‘astronomical.’
There is more emptiness in the atoms composing the wall of a cabin than there
is matter! And this goes for all matter.All matter is mostly emptiness … What prevents your hand, for example,
from passing through a wall is not that there is some ‘thing’ or ‘things’
(atoms) in the way, but more so because there is an atomic energy field that
prevents the atoms from one’s hand to pass by the atoms of the wall.”
–Aaron G. L. Adoni, “The Gnosis of Kali Yuga” (137)

When
touching a wall with your hand, both the wall and your hand are composed of 99.9999999%
empty space, so your sensation of touching some “thing” comes not from
physically colliding hand-atoms with wall-atoms, but rather from an energetic
charge between them.That energetic
charge is then electro-chemically interpreted by your brain into your felt
experience of “wall.”

“How
can something that is not solid be the building blocks that construct this
'solid' wall I am looking at now? It can't - our brains do it.With the emergence of quantum physics,
science has had to concede that atoms are not solid … The atoms that comprise
'physical' matter are overwhelmingly 'empty' and even illustrations of this are
misleading because there is not enough room in a book or science paper to
accurately depict the proportions of particles to 'empty space'. As one writer
put it: 'If an atom was the size of a cathedral, the nucleus would be about the
size of a ten cent piece.’The rest is
‘empty’ to the perception of the five senses because it consists of energy
vibrating on wavelengths higher than the 'physical', and even the particles are
found to be empty as you go deeper into the subatomic realm. If you magnify
anything powerfully enough and go deeper than the atom, you will find that
nothing has solidity - No, not even buildings, cars, mountains or the bones in
your body. It's Illusion! If you find this hard to accept, think of your
dreams. You dream in three-dimensional images and yet no one claims they are
solid do they?” –David Icke, “Infinite Love is the Only Truth, Everything
Else is Illusion” (40)

“Quantum
theory thus reveals an essential interconnectedness of the universe. It shows
that we cannot decompose the world into independently existing smallest units.
As we penetrate into matter, we find that it is made of particles, but these
are not the ‘basic building blocks’ in the sense of Democritus and Newton. They are merely
idealizations which are useful from a practical point of view, but have no
fundamental significance.”-Fritjof Capra, “The Tao of Physics”
(137)

Nobel
Prize winning physicist Niels Bohr was the inventor of the Bohr Atom Model seen
in every high-school physics/chemistry textbook depicting the atom as a mini
solar system with a central nucleus orbited by bands of electrons.He created this model of the atom with which
we are all so familiar, yet he himself knew the model was incorrect at a
fundamental level.He wrote that, “Isolated
material particles are abstractions, their properties being definable and
observable only through their interaction with other systems.”In other words, no atom or sub-atomic
particle has an isolated, separate existence.No material particle has independent properties or location as distinct
from any other.At the atomic and
subatomic levels, no “thing” is separate from every “thing” else – there is
just One field of pulsating energy that composes the entire physical universe.It has been called The Ether, The Field, The
Quantum Field, The Zero-Point Field, and many other names, all referring to
this essential, energetic Oneness.So,
not only was Newton’s
classical physics incorrect about absolute space and time, it was incorrect
about the universe being composed of separate particles of matter.

“This world of separate should have been laid waste once and for all
by the discovery of quantum physics in the early part of the twentieth
century.As the pioneers of quantum
physics peered into the very heart of matter, they were astounded by what they
saw. The tiniest bits of matter aren’t
even matter, as we know it, not even a set something, but sometimes one thing,
sometimes something quite different.And
even stranger, they are often many possible things all at the same time.But most significantly, these subatomic
particles have no meaning in isolation, but only in relationship with
everything else.At its most elemental,
matter cannot be chopped up into self-contained little units, but is completely
indivisible.You can only understand the
universe as a dynamic web of interconnection. Things once in contact remain always in
contact through all space and all time.Indeed, time and space themselves appear to be arbitrary constructs, no
longer applicable at this level of the world.Time and space as we know them do not, in fact, exist.All that appears, as far as the eye can see,
is one long landscape of the here and now.”-Lynne McTaggart, “The Field: The Quest for the Secret Force of the
Universe,” (XXV)

Everyone
knows Einstein’s famous formula E=MC2 meaning Energy = Mass x Light
Speed squared.What we’re seldom taught,
however, are the implications of this equation.E=MC2 shows that matter and energy are really just two
different forms of the same thing.Einstein’s
formula and quantum physics have both verified that all matter is really just
energy vibrating at a low frequency.This means that energy, the One undifferentiated field of quantum
zero-point energy, is the primary reality; So-called “empty” space, “solid” matter,
and “separate” forms, are just subjective interpretations of the One underlying
energy.As Albert Einstein himself said,
“We may therefore regard matter as being constituted by the regions of space
in which the field is extremely intense … There is no place in this new kind of
physics both for the field and matter, for the field is the only reality.”

“The
discovery that mass is nothing but a form of energy has forced us to modify our
concept of a particle in an essential way. In modern physics, mass is no longer
associated with a material substance, and hence particles are not seen as
consisting of any basic ‘stuff’, but as bundles of energy.”-Fritjof Capra, “The Tao of Physics” (202)

Experiments
in quantum physics have shown that atoms and all subatomic particles are more
like verbs than nouns.They are more
like energy bundles or patterns of quantum potential than they are like solid
billiard balls or mini solar systems.The underlying primary reality is the energy field, and “energy” itself is
more a verb, an action, a potential, than a noun – it’s not some set “thing.” When we peer deeply into the subatomic levels
of matter, we see only this energy, this constantly flowing, interacting
field.To make sense of it we create
nouns/models like atoms, electrons, quarks, but the most appropriate “model”
would be a verb, like “universal energizing.”

“These
dynamic patterns, or ‘energy bundles’, form the stable nuclear, atomic and
molecular structures which build up matter and give it its macroscopic solid
aspect, thus making us believe that it is made of some material substance. At
the macroscopic level, this notion of substance is a useful approximation, but
at the atomic level it no longer makes sense. Atoms consist of particles and
these particles are not made of any material stuff. When we observe them, we
never see any substance; what we observe are dynamic patterns continually
changing into one another - a continuous dance of energy.”-Fritjof Capra, “The Tao of Physics” (203)

“Prior to Einstein’s theory of relativity and quantum physics we
held a firm conviction that the universe was composed of solid matter.We believed that the basic building blocks of
this material universe were atoms, which we perceived as compact and
indestructible.The atoms existed in
three-dimensional space and their movements followed certain fixed laws.Accordingly, matter evolved in an orderly
way, moving from the past, through the present, into the future.Within this secure, deterministic viewpoint
we saw the universe as a gigantic machine … Within this image of the universe
developed by Newtonian science, life, consciousness, human beings, and creative
intelligence were seen as accidental by-products that evolved from a dazzling array
of matter.As complex and fascinating as
we might be, we humans were nevertheless seen as being essentially material
objects – little more than highly developed animals or biological thinking
machines.Our boundaries were defined by
the surface of our skin, and consciousness was seen as nothing more than the
product of that thinking organ known as the brain.”-Stanislav Grof, “The Holotropic Mind,”
Harper, (4)

On a metaphysical level, the Newtonian worldview has instilled a common
belief that all life, consciousness, and the diversity of nature are merely
serendipitous accidents evolving out of complex interactions between particles
of physical matter.The idea that life, consciousness,
and the complexity of nature arose by accident, for holistic thinkers, seems
like a ludicrous improbability.But for
so-called logical, scientific thinkers, this worldview has long-standing merit.Many are happy to accept that space, time,
and matter all spontaneously came from nowhere for no reason; that a sneezing
singularity expanded and evolved through trial and error and survival of the
fittest over billions of years.At some
point, somehow, life and consciousness arose from non-living, unconscious
matter, then continued gaining complexity through time until humanity, the
pinnacle of billions of years of mechanical evolution, emerged with all these perceptions,
sensations, emotions, and internal experiences just by accident.

“Traditional science holds the belief that organic matter and life
grew from the chemical ooze of the primeval ocean solely through the random
interactions of atoms and molecules.Similarly, it is argued that matter was organized into living cells, and
cells into complex multicellular organisms with central nervous systems, solely
by accident and ‘natural selection.’And
somehow, along with these explanations, the assumption that consciousness is a
by-product of material processes occurring in the brain has become one of the
most important metaphysical tenets of the Western worldview.As modern science discovered the profound
interactions between creative intelligence and all levels of reality, this
simplistic image of the universe becomes increasingly untenable.The probability that human consciousness and
our infinitely complex universe could have come into existence through the
random interactions of inert matter has aptly been compared to that of a
tornado blowing through a junkyard and accidentally assembling a 747 jumbo jet.”-Stanislav Grof, “The Holotropic Mind” (5)

“Many
processes certainly appear to be explainable in approximately mechanistic,
reductionistic terms.But as physicists
have delved progressively deeper into the nature of reality, they find that it
cannot be understood in mechanistic terms.Mechanism assumes that there are separate objects that interact in
determined, causal ways.But that’s not
the reality we live in.Quantum reality
is holistic, and as such any attempt to study its individual pieces will give
an incomplete picture.It’s like
studying atoms inside an acorn in an attempt to understand the emergence of
leaves on an oak tree – a futile exercise.”-Dean Radin, “Entangled Minds” (222)

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

From the creators of Esoteric Agenda and Kymatica comes another excellent film exposing little-known truths, UnGrip. This latest documentary features sovereign freeman on the land Rob Page and his journey to ungrip himself from the ever-intrusive nanny state.

"Authority is based 100% on our consent to being governed. We all have a free will choice to consent to being governed. When we do that, then we've given them permission to use their authority over us. So when we use our free will to apply for or to register for something, we gave them permission to create a corporation to interact between a man and the system and it's that corporation that the system acts upon. But because we don't know who
we are, we assume or we think that that is us. So when you take a look at your credit card or take a look at
your drivers license, or your birth certificate or any type of that stuff, a lot of people, including myself, thought that that was actually 'me', and that's not true. So, when the courts are acting upon it, all they can really act upon is the corporation and the only reason they can act upon the man is because we agreed to be the representative of that corporation and bind ourself to the terms of conditions to that agreement. But we can say NO at any time." ~Rob Page, UnGrip

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

It has been repeatedly shown that 1). HIV does not even lead to AIDS, 2). AIDS is actually a forced amalgamation of 30 different immune ailments into one misnomer, and 3). The drug “AZT” administered to HIV/AIDS patients actually further suppresses the immune system!

“In the case of AIDS, I showed that HIV was never proved to cause anything. I also

showed that AIDS was not one thing. AIDS was in truth a variety of states of immune

suppression brought about, in different groups and, ultimately, different individuals by a large number of DIFFERENT causes … In this research you are about to read, which took place between 1986 and 1988, I also realized that AIDS was a perfect cover story for a covert targeting of populations, from gay men in NYC to Africans in Uganda. Because, if you labeled them with AIDS, already a kind of hypnotic death sentence, and then you treated them with highly toxic drugs like AZT, and you also, in effect, concealed what was really making them sick, you had DEPOPULATION ON THE MARCH.” -Jon Rappoport, “AIDS Inc. Scandal of the Century” (1)

A colleague of Robert Gallo, the AIDS “discoverer,” molecular biologist Peter Duesberg, has a very different perspective from his associates. In Spin Magazine January 1988, Duesberg told reporter Celia Farber that, "Scientists researching AIDS are much less inclined to ask scrutinizing questions about the etiology (cause) of AIDS when they have invested huge sums of money in companies that make money on the hypothesis that HIV is the AIDS virus. William Haseltine and Max Essex, for example, who are two of the top five AIDS researchers in the country, have millions in stocks in a company they founded that has developed and will sell AIDS kits that test for HIV. How could they be objective? Gallo stands to make a lot of money from patent rights on the virus. His entire reputation depends on this virus. If HIV is not the cause of AIDS, there's nothing left for Gallo."

In an interview with author Jon Rappoport, Peter Duesberg continued describing the facts of life in medical research: “You have to be at NIH to see how they think. They're very, very concerned with the next research step. The step that comes after what they've just discovered. You could remind them that the kind of virus they're studying, HIV, just doesn't really qualify to cause a disease like AIDS, and they would understand what you were saying, and they might even agree with you, as far as general principles were concerned. But then they'd turn around and go right back to working on what they were doing before they talked to you … It's very hard to talk to a person who has a contract with a drug company in his pocket. How do you know that he's telling you the truth? Times have changed. This is high stakes science, financially.” (40-41)

“I continued to find chemicals that could produce AIDS symptoms. But I also came across other factors which could cause these symptoms. Like chemicals, they had nothing to do with the fabled HIV virus. The most important one was starvation, long-term chronic malnutrition. It can occur on one level among junkies, it can occur on an entirely different scale among people of the Third World. Malnutrition is recognized as the single largest source of immune-suppression in the world. The current definitions of AIDS in the Third World now accept, by and large, three symptoms as central to AIDS: weight-loss of 10% or more (wasting away), chronic diarrhea, and chronic fever. These are also signs of chronic malnutrition. Diarrhea, through bringing on severe dehydration, is traditionally one of three largest killers in the world. This is nothing new. The reason these three symptoms are being used as front-line indicators of AIDS involves widespread lack of lab testing facilities in Third World countries. Doctors are meant to use these indicators to do fast, on-the-spot diagnoses of AIDS. In such a situation, numbers of AIDS cases will skyrocket, and a hidden equality will be established between AIDS and hunger. But the ‘disease’ is hunger, not AIDS.” -Jon Rappoport, “AIDS Inc. Scandal of the Century” (17-18)

Millions upon millions of Africans have been and continue being misdiagnosed and given AZT when they need food. On top of this, most of the hunger and poverty in Africa today was stirred up and created by western nations. Hunger and poverty are not natural states of being, even for so-called “third world” nations. In fact when first world charity organizations “help” poorer countries with food and medication, the long-term result always hurts the populations and helps western corporate/pharmacratic imperialism. Even food donations have eventual damaging effects. Farmers and others essential to local economies find it easier to stand in lines getting free food handed to them than it is to work the land. That is until the donations stop coming in or move to a different location; by that time the villagers are dependent on their regular food deliveries, local power structures change to reflect this, and food/food distribution is used as a weapon by western power brokers.

“The truth is, AIDS is not a single illness, it is an international operation, a business, a bureaucracy. It is, in the Third World, a way of substituting harmful medical drugs for what is needed: food. With AIDS, an attempt is being made to reduce varieties of suffering and political conflict and starvation and chemical abuse to a single entity. Since that viral entity, HIV, is sensational and frightening, it satisfies the desire not to think, not to learn, not to find out what is happening in a world of troubles. It is also easier to dump corrosive medical drugs and pesticides on the Third World than to face up to their widening toxic effect on people. Easier to call their symptoms AIDS. What happens when you try to paint a portrait of an area said to have AIDS, and you find, instead, a combination of drugs, pesticides, starvation, older diseases, and other

environmental factors, all capable of causing immunosuppression, all capable of

producing the symptoms of what is called AIDS? What happens is, if you want to satisfy your medical peers, if you want to win research grant monies, you overlook the

anomalies and say it's all AIDS. If you don't, you admit the picture is diverse and

AZT, the HIV/AIDS medication, was approved by the FDA in record time, granted a treatment/recommendation in less than five days and full pharmaceutical licensing in less than six months. AZT specifically damages bone marrow, the site where raw materials for immune cells are manufactured. Thus they are prescribing an immune-suppressant to treat immune-system problems. Essentially, if you didn’t have AIDS before taking AZT, you’re going to have it shortly thereafter.

In his interview with Jon Rappoport, Peter Duesberg said AZT “is hell for the bone marrow... It kills normal cells quite, quite extensively ... AZT is a poison. It is cytotoxic. I think that giving it to people with AIDS is highly irresponsible... the drug is only going to hurt you … And now they are giving it to people with no symptoms. It's supposed to prevent HIV from replicating, yet they can find no evidence that HIV is replicating in the first place.” (42-3)

“Kary Mullis, the winner of the Nobel Prize in chemistry for his invention of the

insists that there is not one paper in the literature that proves HIV causes AIDS. He

derides those researchers who unthinkingly accept the HIV hypothesis Another Nobel

winner, Wally Gilbert, who teaches at Harvard, has spoken in more muted tones about problems with the HIV hypothesis, as has Harry Rubin, a godfather of modern viral research, who teaches at UC Berkeley along with Duesberg. Richard Strohman, a cell biologist at Berkeley, has voiced objections to the HIV model as well. There are many obvious objections, on scientific grounds, to HIV as the cause of AIDS. The traditional method of assigning a germ as the cause of a disease, called Koch's Postulates, has failed to make anything of HIV. Many people diagnosed with AIDS do not show HIV present in their bodies. No one can find a convincing description, after 17 years, of how HIV destroys immune cells. And so on. Yet the press continues to parrot the party line, and governments all over the world support HIV as the cause of AIDS with billions of dollars.” -Jon Rappoport, “AIDS Inc. Scandal of the Century” (82)

Sunday, August 12, 2012

“I investigated the Department of Defense's germ warfare appropriations request and learned that the option to develop synthetic biological agents - bioweapons as alternatives to nuclear weapons - came from Dr. Henry Kissinger, who was gradually placed in his position of authority as National Security Advisor under Richard Nixon, the most powerful man in government, by Nelson Rockefeller and his affiliates at the Council on Foreign Relations. Moreover, I traced where the money went. It went, in fact, to a firm called Litton Bionetics, a subsidiary of the mega-military contractor Litton Industries, whose President, Roy Ash, was being considered as an alternate to Henry Kissinger for the National Security Advisor post. Instead, Roy Ash became Richard Nixon’s chairman of the Presidents Advisory Council on Executive Organizations, and Assistant to the President of the United States. And Litton Industries was given over $5 billion in military contracts during the first term of the Nixon administration, $10 million of which went towards the development of AIDS-like viruses.” -Dr. Len Horowitz in a speech before the Citizens Against Legal Loopholes Rally, The Capitol Mall, 1996

During his speech at the Capitol Mall and in his book “Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola”, Harvard graduate, Dr. Len Horowitz exposed how Henry Kissinger, the Rockefellers, and other NWO minions funded and created AIDS, Ebola, and other viruses as bioweapons to suit their depopulation agenda.

“You will learn that Dr. Robert Gallo, the famous NCI molecular biologist, pardoned by President Clinton last year for scientific fraud and misconduct, and credited with the discovery of the AIDS virus, set about to develop immune system ravaging, AIDS-like viruses, along with other Litton Bionetics researchers. You will learn that they took monkey viruses that were humanly benign, recombined them with DNA, RNA, and enzymes from other animal viruses that caused leukemias, lymphomas, and sarcomas, and then to get them to jump species, they cultured these new mutant viruses in human white blood cells in some studies, and human fetal tissue cells in other studies, to produce immune-system-destroying, cancer-causing viruses that could enter humans and produce virtually identical effects to what the AIDS virus is currently doing in people around the world … In the end, the research question I asked, ‘Did these viruses, AIDS and Ebola, evolve naturally, were they accidentally produced, or were they intentionally created and deployed?’ I conclude, unquestionably, they are not natural. I leave you the reader, and concerned citizens of America and the world, to decide whether it was a horrible accident or treacherous covert population control experiment.” -Dr. Len Horowitz in a speech before the Citizens Against Legal Loopholes Rally, The Capitol Mall, 1996

“I suddenly realized how easy it was to access information I assumed would be classified. I selected and then output the information to the printer. The hardcopy included Soviet, Caribbean, and Cuban International Affairs references. ‘Belitskiy on How, Where AIDS Virus Originated,’ read one title. It documented a Moscow World Service broadcast in English. Another, ‘Commentary Accuses U.S. of Developing AIDS Virus,’ was broadcast by the Havana International Service. A third in the Caribbean press was tagged ‘German Claims AIDS Created by Pentagon.’ Moments later, the BPL librarian returned with the Rockefeller Commission report about the CIA. Before he left, I asked how I might locate the documents I had just learned about. He told me they were on microfilm two floors up. Within a couple of hours, I had retrieved and read them all. Apparently, several researchers throughout the world - Dr. John Seale from London, Dr. Manuel Servin in Mexico, and Dr. Jacobo Segal from Berlin - had alleged what Strecker had. The Russian report even cited a West German company named OTRAG for having conducted green monkey virus experiments in Zaire that had allegedly led to the development of ‘a mutant virus that would be a human killer.’” -Dr. Len Horowitz, “Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola” (61)

Dr. Robert Strecker was one of the first to publish peer reviewed work regarding the origin of the AIDS virus. He found that there are no genetic markers in the AIDS virus typical of the primate, and that it simply cannot thrive in monkeys. He found that AIDS was non-existent in Africa before 1975 and yet supposedly resulted from a 1940s monkey bite. Even if it had, he showed how the resulting epidemic would have occurred in the 1960s, not the late 70s. Also if green monkeys were responsible for AIDS, the Pygmies of rural Africa should have many more AIDS cases than the urban populations, but the opposite is true.

Strecker filed a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain documents showing that the US Department of Defense appropriated $10 million in 1969 to studying immune-system-destroying agents to be used for germ warfare. It was just shortly after this that the World Health Organization (WHO) began experimenting with a lymphotrophic virus, produced in cows, to use on humans. They found, as Strecker did, that AIDS thrives in cows and cow carcasses and Bovine Lymphotrophic Virus (BLV) is very similar to HIV.

In 1969 … [the] United States Defense Department requested and got $10 million to make the AIDS virus in labs as a political/ethnic weapon to be used mainly against Blacks. The feasibility program and labs were to have been completed by 1974-1975; the virus between 1974-1979. The World Health Organization started to inject AIDS-laced smallpox vaccine into over 100 million Africans (population reduction) in 1977. And over 2000 young white male homosexuals (Trojan horse) in 1978 with the hepatitis B vaccine through the Centers for Disease Control/New YorkBloodCenter.’ Collin, in his review, added: ‘Strecker remarks that it would be relatively easy to implant such viruses in the cow carcasses used to produce the smallpox vaccine. When the smallpox vaccine sera were recovered from the animal carcasses, animallymphotrophic viruses could be carried or mutated or incorporated in the vaccine … the epidemiology of multiple ‘contaminated’ smallpox vaccines given in the early 1970s would provide exactly the right timetable for such a widespread AIDS epidemic in Africa today." -Dr. Len Horowitz, “Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola” (17)

The original story propagated by the mass media was that AIDS was introduced to the human population by African green monkeys. Supposedly an African was bitten or had sex with a monkey, then brought it into the US gay population. In an interview with Robert Strecker, Len Horowitz asked, “But what about the green monkey theory - the theory that a green monkey bit an African or someone had sex with an ape?” To which Dr. Strecker replied, “That's just nonsense. . . . Green monkeys are about the size of chickens. So the idea of a human having sex with a female monkey the size of a chicken is, of course, absurd. In addition, the theory that a transmission occurred through biting, of course, is always said to be close to impossible. If you look at the CDC and everybody else, they say that biting is not an easy way to spread these diseases except in the case of the purported green monkey which is suddenly the way it was spread.” (98)

In 1977 WHO launched a major smallpox vaccine campaign in Africa which began the rapid spread of AIDS there. Then in 1978 the Center for Disease Control (CDC) targeted 2000 gay men, ones who specifically had multiple sexual partners, and gave them laced hepatitis B vaccines. The shots, manufactured by Merck, were administered in New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, St. Louis, Houston, and Chicago - the same 6 US cities with the highest incidence rates and death rates from AIDS.

Continuing with Dr. Horowitz and Dr. Strecker’s interview, they shed some light on the motive behind this scam. Strecker posits that the reason for intentionally infecting gays was because little would be done about it: “If you look in the world, what percentage of the world's AIDS cases are heterosexuals? Over 90 percent … It's only in this country that you have this strange, unexplained predominance of homosexuals … Just think about this. Suppose you put this virus in the heterosexuals or kids. What kind of response would have occurred compared to the response that did occur?” (109-10)

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Dr. Michael Greger, Director of Public Health for the US Humane Society and founder of NutritionFacts.org is now touring the country giving the above lecture entitled "Uprooting the Leading Causes of Death." He and his team have collected and examined all the published and peer reviewed medical literature (including controls and double-blind studies) pertaining to the top 15 causes of death among Americans. Amazingly Dr. Greger's team found that a simple change in diet prevented, and also usually reversed, 14 of them! The only cause of death unaffected by this dietary change was "accidental death," which by definition is impossible to prevent anyway. So what is this simple dietary change which can prevent and even reverse the leading causes of premature death!? Eliminate all animal products and consume only plant, or "vegan", foods. It's that simple.