On Jan 4, 1:28 am, Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:> Alright, these are the 4 symmetrical Maxwell Equations with magnetic> monopoles:>> div*E = r_E> div*B = r_B> - curlxE = dB + J_B> curlxB = dE + J_E>> Now to derive the Dirac Equation from the Maxwell Equations we add the> lot together:>> div*E = r_E> div*B = r_B> - curlxE = dB + J_B> curlxB = dE + J_E> ________________>> div*E + div*B + (-1)curlxE + curlxB = r_E + r_B + dB + dE + J_E + J_B>> Now Wikipedia has a good description of how Dirac derived his famous> equation which gives this:>> (Ad_x + Bd_y + Cd_z + (i/c)Dd_t - mc/h) p = 0>> So how is the above summation of Maxwell Equations that of a> generalized Dirac Equation?>> Well, the four terms of div and curl are the A,B,C,D terms. And the> right side of the equation can all be> conglomerated into one term and the negative sign in the Faraday law> can turn that right side into the negative sign.>

Now one item that tells me I am on the correct path, in that theMaxwell Equations are the ultimate equations of physics and that theycan derive the Dirac Equation, so that the Maxwell Equations are a farfar more larger set of generalized equations than the Dirac Equation,is that not only do they have more terms and thus cover more physics,but that the Dirac Equation has one negative sign. The MaxwellEquations, because of the Faraday Law and its consequent Lenz's lawhas one negative sign. The signs cannot be manipulated or tamperedwith.

So that if the Dirac Equation is a minor equation of the GeneralizedMaxwell Equations, there needs to be one and only one negative sign.

And the above shows us that both the Maxwell equations and the Diracequation have one negative signed term.

Now the Generalized Maxwell Equations have far more terms and onereason being is that the Maxwell Equations require the photon to be aDouble Transverse Wave, not a single transverse wave that Dirac wasunder the impression for the photon.

If Dirac had known by 1930 that the photon has to be a DoubleTransverse wave, he would have looked to correct his "Dirac Equation".

Google's New-Newsgroups censors AP posts and halted a properarchiving of author, but Drexel's Math Forum does not and my posts?inarchive form is seen here: