David S. Miller <davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com> wrote:> And the egcs team has not said the latter. But they will turn the> feature off until such time as the fix is made, since it generates> incorrect code.

Er.. it *sometimes* generates incorrect code.

Wouldn't it be better to simply generate an error ("sorry, but ...")forcases where it doesn't generate correct code. [If Linus's usage arethe only known cases where it generates correct code then these wouldbe base for the template of what's acceptable.]