Here is the basic form employed on the False Purpose Rundown. It is written for use on any pc or pre-OT beginning the rundown.

This list may have questions added to it by the C/S, but questions are not deleted from it in any case. Other False Purpose RD forms may also be used in the course of the rundown, but this list is given as the basic list to be used for any pc beginning the rundown.

AUDITOR INSTRUCTIONS

The auditor does the whole form on the pc, starting with the Section I questions and proceeding on through to the end of the Section II questions. Every question is cleared and checked on the meter per standard Sec Checking tech.

Reading questions on this list are handled with False Purpose Rundown pro­cedure. The form itself is composed of two sections of questions.

Questions in Section I of this form ask for overts, which are handled with Steps A through G of the False Purpose Rundown procedure.2

Questions in Section II ask directly for evil purposes and destructive inten­tions, and are handled using Steps C through G of False Purpose Rundown pro­cedure.

SECTION I QUESTIONS:

1. DO YOU HAVE A BACK-OFF IN HANDLING SOME AREA OF YOUR LIFE?
(Find which area he has a back-off on handling, get when it started and then pull the prior overt. Handle that overt per Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure. Then recheck the original question, 1.)

2. IS THERE SOME OVERT ACT YOU’VE HAD TO RESTRAIN YOURSELF FROM COMMITTING?

3. IS THERE SOMETHING YOU HAVE DONE YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY WITHHELD IN AUDITING OR SEC CHECKING?

4. DO YOU HAVE A SECRET OVERT?

5. DO YOU HAVE A BACK-OFF ON HANDLING SOME PERSON?
(Find out which person he has a back-off on handling, get when it started and then pull the prior overt. Handle that overt per Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure. Then recheck the original question, 5.)

6. HAVE YOU DONE SOMETHING THAT YOU COULD GET INTO SERIOUS TROUBLE FOR?

7. HAVE YOU BEEN REASONABLE WITH PERSONS YOU SHOULD HAVE HANDLED?
(Find out what person[s] he has been reasonable with in handling, get when it started and then pull the prior overt. Handle that overt per Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure. Then recheck the original question, 7.)

8. DO YOU HAVE SOME WITHHOLD YOU HAVEN’T WANTED TO DISCUSS?

9. HAVE YOU EVER BETRAYED A FRIEND?

10. HAVE YOU COMMITTED AN OVERT AGAINST YOURSELF?

11. HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING THAT WAS HARMFUL TO YOUR OWN BODY?

12. IS THERE SOMETHING YOU REGRET HAVING DONE TO SOMEONE?

13. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN SEXUALLY UNFAITHFUL?

14. HAVE YOU EVER DELIBERATELY HURT SOMEONE YOU LOVED?

15. HAVE YOU EVER COMPROMISED YOUR INTEGRITY?

16. HAVE YOU EVER USED DRUGS OR ALCOHOL TO TRAP SOMEONE?

17. HAVE YOU EVER ILL-TREATED CHILDREN?

18. HAVE YOU COMMITTED ANY OVERTS AGAINST YOUR FAMILY?

19. HAVE YOU EVER DONE SOMETHING HARMFUL TO ANOTHER’S MIND?

20. HAVE YOU DELIBERATELY QUICKIED ANY PRODUCT OR IMPORTANT CYCLE ON YOUR JOB?

21. HAVE YOU DONE A BRUSH-OFF JOB OF SOMETHING?

22. HAVE YOU KNOWINGLY GONE BY MIS-Us ON YOUR JOB?

23. IS THERE SOMETHING YOU HAVE DONE YOU THINK MIGHT GET YOU REMOVED FROM YOUR JOB OR GROUP, IF IT WERE KNOWN?

24. HAVE YOU EVER CONSISTENTLY MADE A PRACTICE OF SEXUAL PERVERSION?

25. HAVE YOU CHEATED SOMEONE WHO TRUSTED YOU?

26. HAVE YOU DONE SOMETHING TO MAKE YOUR GROUP OR ORGANIZATION LOSE?

27. HAVE YOU EVER CAVED SOMEONE IN?

28. HAVE YOU MISREPRESENTED YOUR KNOWLEDGE OR SKILL?

29. HAVE YOU EVER PARTICIPATED IN ELECTRIC SHOCKING OR IMPLANTING SOMEONE?

30. HAVE YOU EVER DELIBERATELY INJURED SOMEONE?

31. HAVE YOU EVER INJURED DIANETICS OR SCIENTOLOGY?

32. HAVE YOU COMMITTED AN OVERT ON A SCIENTOLOGY ORGANIZATION?

33. IS THERE AN OVERT THAT YOU HAVE COVERED UP WITH FALSE PR?
(The act of false PRing should be gotten off, but then pull the actual OVERT that was being covered up, E/S to F/N.)

34. HAVE YOU ALTERED LRH TECH?

35. IS THERE SOME OTHER OVERT YOU HAVE COMMITTED THAT WOULD BE AWFUL TO HAVE TO GET OFF?

36. HAVE YOU EVER CAVED YOURSELF IN?

SECTION II QUESTIONS:

37. DO YOU HAVE A SECRET DESIRE TO SEE SOMEONE FAIL?

38. HAVE YOU EVER HAD AN IMPULSE TO COMMIT SUICIDE?

39. HAVE YOU HAD SOME PURPOSE WHICH IS IN OPPOSITION TO THE PURPOSE OF SCIENTOLOGY?

40. DO YOU HAVE SOME SECRET PURPOSE?

41. DO YOU INTEND TO HARM SCIENTOLOGY DISSEMINATION?

42. HAVE YOU HAD A HIDDEN EVIL PURPOSE ON SOME OTHER DYNAMIC?

43. HAVE YOU HAD A FEELING OF WANTING TO GET EVEN FOR SOMETHING?

44. HAVE YOU EVER HAD A VICIOUS, CRUEL INTENTION TOWARDS SOMEONE?

45. IS THERE SOME OUT-ETHICS IMPULSE THAT YOU HAVE FAILED TO RESTRAIN?
(Pull the overt.)

END RUDS:

(Session withholds are handled with usual withhold rudiment pro­cedure. Undisclosed overts missed in doing the questions on the list are handled with Steps A-G of False Purpose RD procedure.)

1. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD A HALF-TRUTH?

2. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD AN UNTRUTH?

3. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU SAID SOMETHING ONLY TO IMPRESS ME?

4. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TRIED TO DAMAGE SOMEONE?

5. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU DELIBERATELY TRIED TO INFLUENCE THE E-METER?

6. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU SUCCESSFULLY WITHHELD SOMETHING?

7. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU COVERED UP FOR SOMEONE ELSE?

8. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS ANYONE SAID YOU HAD A WITHHOLD WHEN YOU DIDN’T HAVE ONE?

FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN CORRECTION LIST

This list is used in repairing flubs or case upsets on persons receiving the False Purpose RD.

If after a session on the False Purpose Rundown the person red tags at the Examiner or if he gets sick or upset or falls on his head shortly after the auditing, this list should be assessed and handled to straighten the matter out. The repair action would be a 24-hour repair priority per policy.

If there is a bog during a False Purpose Rundown session, the auditor uses this list to sort the matter out and get the pc rolling again.
This list would normally be done Method 3, as the questions are written in a precise sequence: The initial questions cover those items which would have to be handled first, and the rest of the questions are laid out generally in the order of likelihood of what would be found to have caused the difficulty.

The list should be used with a prefix which acts as a time limiter, such as “In this session, _____?” or “On the False Purpose Rundown,_____?”

The majority of the questions on this list are handled by fully clearing a withhold or withholds that were left unhandled in a session. Once such a question is handled, it is rechecked—as per Sec Checking procedure—to ensure that there is no more to be gotten on that question.

1. YOU WENT EXTERIOR? _________
(Indicate it. If pc has never had an Int RD, give him a standard Int RD per Int RD Series 2. On a Clear or OT, do not run any Dianetics; do an End of Endless Int RD. If you are not a Class V Graduate Auditor, end off for a Class V Grad or above to handle.)

2. LIST ERROR? _________
(Indicate. If Class III or above, find out what list, and repair with L4BRB. If not Class III, end off for handling by a Class III or above.)

3. WRONG ITEM? _________
(Handle as in #2.)

4. DID YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK? _________
(ARCU, CDEINR, E/S to F/N.)

5. WERE YOU AUDITED OVER A PROBLEM? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)

6. WAS A WITHHOLD MISSED? _________
(Pull it fully, and handle as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

7. DID YOU TELL PART OF A WITHHOLD BUT NOT THE REST? _________
(Get all of the withhold, and handle as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

8. DID YOU MISDIRECT THE AUDITOR? _________
(Treat as a M/W/H. Find out what the overt was that the pc misdirected the auditor away from, and handle the overt as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

9. WITHHELD SAYING SOMETHING FOR FEAR OF GETTING INTO ETHICS TROUBLE? _________
(Pull it fully, as per Sec Checking procedure, to find out what exactly the pc withheld. After getting the what, when, etc., also ask: I. “What appeared there?” II. “What didn’t appear there?” and then carry on with the False Purpose RD procedure steps—A, B and so on.)

10. DID YOU WITHHOLD SOMETHING BECAUSE OF WHAT OTHERS MIGHT THINK? _________
(Handle as in question #9.)

11. DID YOU AVOID TELLING ONE OVERT BY GIVING A DIFFERENT ONE? _________
(Treat as a M/W/H. Find out what the overt was that the pc avoided telling the auditor, and handle the overt as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

12. DID THE AUDITOR FAIL TO FIND OUT SOMETHING ABOUT YOU? _________
(Pull it fully and complete its handling as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

13. WAS THERE AN EARLIER OVERT UNDISCLOSED? _________
(Pull it, and complete its handling as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

14. WAS A CHAIN OF OVERTS NOT TAKEN BACK TO BASIC? _________
(Flatten the overt chain and complete its handling as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

15. OVERT TOO LATE ON THE CHAIN? _________
(Get the earlier overt and complete its handling as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

16. WAS AN EARLIER WHOLE TRACK OVERT ON THE CHAIN MISSED? _________
(Get the earlier overt and complete its handling as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

17. HAS AN OVERT BEEN JUSTIFIED? _________
(Pull the justifications off the overt, then complete its handling as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

18. WAS THERE SOME OTHER WAY YOU JUSTIFIED THE OVERT? _________
(Pull the justifications off the overt, then complete its handling as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

19. HAVE YOU TRIED TO LESSEN AN OVERT? _________
(Find out how he tried to lessen the overt. Then get all of the overt, pull all justifications and complete its handling with steps A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

20. A CHAIN OR INCIDENT THAT WAS TOO INCREDIBLE TO BE BELIEVED? _________
(Get what the chain or incident was. Put in the buttons: Suppressed, Invalidated, Protested, Anxious About, Rejected. It will probably blow and F/N. If it doesn’t, handle per the appropriate step of the False Purpose RD procedure, depending on whether the incident was an overt or evil purpose or whatever.)

21. WERE YOU WORRIED ABOUT REPUTATION? _________
(Clean it up 2WC E/S to F/N. Then check for an overt or overts before pc became worried about reputation, and handle with False Purpose RD procedure.)

22. JUMPED TO A DIFFERENT OVERT CHAIN? _________
(Find out what overt was being pulled just before the pc jumped to some other overt chain, and complete that original overt chain as per A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure. Then take up the overt chain that the pc had jumped to, and handle that one similarly.)

23. WENT PAST BASIC ON AN OVERT CHAIN? _________
(Indicate it. Spot the flat point and indicate the overrun. Rehab if needed, to F/N. Continue with False Purpose RD procedure, step B.)

24. WAS THERE AN EVIL PURPOSE THAT DID NOT FULLY BLOW? _________
(Find the prior confusion and handle as per step C of False Purpose RD procedure. If still not blown, continue assessing this repair list.)

25. ON AN EVIL PURPOSE, WAS THE PRIOR CONFUSION NOT FOUND? _________
(Find the prior confusion and handle as per step C of False Purpose RD procedure.)

26. ON AN EVIL PURPOSE, WAS THE WRONG PRIOR CONFUSION FOUND? _________
(Find the correct prior confusion and handle as per the False Purpose RD procedure, from step C onwards.)

27. ON AN EVIL PURPOSE, FAILED TO GET THE EXACT PRIOR CONFUSION? _________
(Find the exact prior confusion and handle as per the False Purpose RD procedure, from step C onwards.)

28. WAS THERE AN EARLIER TIME WHEN YOU HAD THAT SAME EVIL PURPOSE? ________
(Find the earlier time the pc had that same evil purpose, as per step D of False Purpose RD procedure, and if no spectacular release or persistent F/N, carry on with steps E, etc.)

29. ON AN EVIL PURPOSE, DID NOT GET THE FIRST MOMENT OF THE FIRST PRIOR CONFUSION? _________
(Reorient to the earliest prior confusion found and get the first moment of that confusion. If no EP, continue as per step D of False Purpose RD procedure.)

30. HAS A SERVICE FAC BEEN MISSED? _________
(2WC to F/N. If no spectacular blow on just getting off the service fac, and if you are a Class IV Auditor or above, run it out fully with the R3SC brackets. If you are not Class IV, end off for handling by a Class IV.) (Note: R3SC is a major action and must not be run over out-ruds;
the pc must be F/N and VGIs before embarking on the R3SC brackets. If in doubt, end off for a new C/S.)

31. IS THERE SOME COMPUTATION THAT YOU USE TO MAKE OTHERS WRONG? _________
(2WC to F/N. If no spectacular blow on just getting off the service fac, and if you are a Class IV Auditor or above, run it out fully with the R3SC brackets. If you are not Class IV, end off for handling by a Class IV.) (Note: R3SC is a major action and must not be run over out-
ruds; the pc must be F/N and VGIs before embarking on the R3SC brackets. If in doubt, end off for a new C/S.)

32. PRIOR TO HAVING THE EVIL PURPOSE WAS THERE A MISUNDERSTOOD WORD? _________
(Get what the word was and clear it up to F/N. This may be what was holding the confusion in place and, on finding this, may result in a spectacular release and persistent F/N. If not, continue as per step D of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

33. NO PRIOR CONFUSION? _________
(2WC to F/N. Depending on what comes up in reply to this question, the auditor would continue with the evil purpose chain being addressed or, in the case of a spectacular release and persistent F/N, would end off for that session.)

34. UNDISCLOSED OUT-ETHICS SITUATION? _________
(Pull it as an overt and carry on from there as per the False Purpose RD procedure, steps A, B and so on.)

35. HAS A CRIME BEEN COVERED UP? _________
(Pull the crime and carry on from there as per the False Purpose RD procedure, steps A, B and so on.)

36. DID YOU WITHHOLD TELLING THE AUDITOR WHAT THE EVIL PURPOSE WAS? _________
(Get what the evil purpose is, and continue on as per step C of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

37. HAVE YOU BEEN GIVING FALSE REPORTS OR PR TO COVER UP A CRIME? _________
(Get what the false reports or PR were, then get the crime that was being covered up. Treat the crime as per the False Purpose RD procedure, steps A, B, etc.)

38. DID THE AUDITOR TRY TO RUN OUT A GOOD INTENTION? _________
(Indicate the BPC and that this was incorrect and should not have been done. If no relief, 2WC E/S “times when an auditor tried to run out a good intention” to F/N.)

39. NOT YOUR EVIL PURPOSE? _________
(If so, indicate to the pc this was not his item. Don’t try to find whose it was.)

40. WAS THERE SOME EVIL PURPOSE YOU DIDN’T DARE MENTION? _________
(Get what the evil purpose is, and continue on as per step C of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

41 . HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN A BLACK PR CAMPAIGN? _________
(Pull as a withhold, finding out the specific black PR he has spread, about whom and to whom, and handle this as an overt as per the False Purpose RD procedure, steps A, B, etc. Then, get the prior overt the pc committed and handle with steps A to G. Then check for and handle any other such overt. When these have been handled, recheck the original question, #41.)

(Note for C/S to program the case for additional FPRD actions as needed.)

42. WAS A POSTULATE MISSED? _________
(Get what the postulate was. It may be a false purpose or evil purpose, in which case carry on as per step C of the False Purpose RD procedure. Do not try to run out a good [prosurvival] intention or postulate.)

43. HAD THE EVIL PURPOSE ALREADY BLOWN? _________
(Rehab.)

44. WAS IT NOT AN EVIL PURPOSE BUT SOME OTHER SORT OF NON-SURVIVAL CONSIDERATION? _________
(Get what it is. Then do steps C to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

45. WAS THERE A CRASHING MISUNDERSTOOD WORD? _________
(Find and handle the Mis-U word as per HCOB 17 June 79, CRASHING MIS-Us: THE KEY TO COMPLETED CYCLES OF ACTION AND PRODUCTS.)

46. WAS AN F/N OVERRUN? _________
(Rehab.)

47. WAS AN F/N MISSED? _________
(Find out on what and rehab.)

48. WAS AN IMPLANT RESTIMULATED? _________
(Indicate. The pc may BD and F/N with relief and VGIs. If not get the pc to recall moments before the implant, until it blows. If still no blow, date/locate it.)

49. DID YOU FAIL TO ANSWER A CONFESSIONAL QUESTION? _________
(Find out which question and handle with the False Purpose RD procedure, starting with step A.)

50. IS THERE MORE THAT SHOULD BE KNOWN ABOUT SOME OVERT? _________
(Get all of it, using Sec Checking tech, and then carry on with the False Purpose RD procedure, steps A, B, etc.)

51. WAS THERE A QUESTION THAT THE AUDITOR SAID DIDN’T READ THAT SHOULD HAVE? _________
(Find out what question and get in Suppress and Inval on it. Then
handle it fully with the False Purpose RD procedure.)

52. WAS A QUESTION OR ITEM TAKEN UP THAT WASN’T CHARGED? _________
(Get what, indicate it was a false read. Itsa E/S to F/N.)

53. WAS A HOT QUESTION NOT TAKEN UP? _________
(Find out what question and get in Suppress and Inval on it. Then handle it fully with the False Purpose RD procedure.)

54. DID YOU TELL A LIE? _________
(Pull this as per Sec Checking tech, including getting what overt he was covering up with the lie—with all specifics—and handle it using the False Purpose RD procedure, steps A, B, etc.)

55. WAS A QUESTION LEFT UNFLAT? _________
(Find out which one and flatten it with the appropriate step of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

56. HAD YOU TOLD ALL? _________
(Indicate it if so. 2WC E/S to F/N.)

57. HAS AN OVERT BEEN PROTESTED? _________
(Get what it was and get in the Protest button on it. Then handle it fully with False Purpose RD procedure.)

58. WERE THERE OVERTS OR WITHHOLDS THAT WEREN’T ACCEPTED? _________
(Get what. Get who wouldn’t accept it. Get off any Protest and Inval, and clean it up E/S to F/N.)

59. DID THE AUDITOR NOT HEAR OR ACKNOWLEDGE WHAT YOU SAID? _________
(Indicate the BPC. Get what the auditor missed and clean it up
E/S to F/N.)

60. HAS SOMETHING BEEN MISUNDERSTOOD? _________
(Clean it up, clearing any Mis-U words, each to F/N.)

66. ARE THERE OPINIONS YOU DON’T DARE SAY? _________
(Get what. 2WC E/S to F/N. Then check for an overt or overts before the pc felt he couldn’t state his opinions. Handle with False Purpose RD procedure.)

67. WERE YOU WAITING FOR A DIFFERENTLY WORDED OVERT OR WITHHOLD QUESTION? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Then pull any overt chain that was missed and handle with False Purpose RD procedure, steps A, B, etc.)

68. ARE YOU WITHHOLDING ANYTHING? _________
(Get what it is and handle with False Purpose RD procedure.)

69. DID YOU TELL ANY HALF-TRUTHS? _________
(Get all of the withhold and handle with False Purpose RD procedure.)

70. WAS THERE SOMETHING THE AUDITOR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN ABOUT YOU THAT HE DIDN’T? _________
(Pull it and handle with False Purpose RD procedure.)

71. PRIOR TO COMMITTING THE OVERT WAS THERE AN EVIL PURPOSE OR DESTRUCTIVE INTENTION? _________
(Get what the evil purpose is, and continue on as per step C of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

72. DO YOU HAVE A HARMFUL INTENTION TOWARD OTHERS? _________
(Pull the harmful intention and continue on as per step C of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

73. IS THERE SOME PURPOSE OR CONSIDERATION YOU HAVE THAT CONFLICTS WITH SCIENTOLOGY? _________
(Get what the evil purpose is, and continue on as per step C of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

74. WAS SOME HIDDEN IMPULSE NOT REVEALED? _________
(Get what it is and continue its handling as per step C of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

75. DID YOU PR AN ETHICS OFFICER INIo BELIEVING A SITUATION WAS HANDLED WHEN IT WASN’T? _________
(Handle as a withhold and continue with step A of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

76. DO YOU INTEND TO GO ON COMMITTING OVERTS SIMILAR TO THOSE YOU’VE GOTTEN OFF? _________
(Handle as a withhold and continue with step A of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

77. WERE YOU PRETENDING TO BE PTS TO AVOID TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR SOME OVERT OR INTENTION? _________
(Handle as a withhold and continue handling the overt or intention with the False Purpose RD procedure.)

78. DID THE AUDITOR CALL AN F/N WHEN YOU DIDN’T FEEL YOU WERE F/Ning? _________
(Indicate it if so. 2WC E/S to F/N. Find out what question was being run and complete its handling to F/N. If this turns out to be an unflat overt chain, flatten it fully with the False Purpose RD procedure.)

79. DID YOU HAVE TO GET THE SAME W/Hs OFF MORE THAN ONCE? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)

81. WAS THERE A WITHHOLD THAT KEPT COMING UP? _________
(Get what it was and then clean up anything that wasn’t gotten off about the withhold, any unhandled misses of that withhold, and if not then fully handled, take it E/S and find and handle the underlying, unhandled incident as per False Purpose RD. [Ref: HCOB 21 Mar. 62, PREPCHECKING DATA, WHEN TO DO A WHAT; Tape: 6201C11, THE MISSED MISSED WITHHOLD])

82. WERE THERE AUDITOR’S CODE BREAKS? _________
(Get what. Indicate it was illegal and 2WC E/S to F/N. C/S to program for a QUESTIONABLE AUDITING REPAIR LIST, HCOB 11 July 82 I. )

83. HAVE YOU WANTED THIS RUNDOWN TO FAIL? _________
(Handle as a W/H. Pull all of the W/H, and then take the O/W E/S to a full handling as per steps A to G of the False Purpose RD.)

84. WERE YOU AFRAID OF WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)

85. WAS THERE AN INJUSTICE? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Then check for any similar overt of the pc’s own and handle any found with False Purpose RD procedure.)

86. WAS THERE A BETRAYAL? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Then check for any similar overt of the pc’s own and handle any found with False Purpose RD procedure.)

87. DID THE AUDITOR GET ANGRY AT YOU? _________
(If this happened, indicate it is illegal to do so. 2WC E/S to F/N. Clean up any ARC break to F/N.) (C/S to program for a QUESTIONABLE AUDITING REPAIR LIST, HCOB 11 July 82 I.)

88. WAS ANYTHING SUPPRESSED? _________
(Clean it up E/S to F/N.)
89. WAS ANYTHING INVALIDATED? _________
(Clean it up E/S to F/N.)

90. HAVE YOU NEVER REALLY DONE ANYTHING BAD? _________
(Handle with “murder routine,” getting an overt or overts and handling with steps A to G of the False Purpose RD procedure.)

91. WAS ANYTHING FALSIFIED? _________
(Clean it up as a W/H and complete its handling with False Purpose RD procedure.)

92. WAS THERE ANY EVALUATION? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)

93. WERE YOU TIRED OR HUNGRY? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)

94. HAD YOU RECENTLY TAKEN DRUGS? MEDICINE? ALCOHOL? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Note for C/S.)

95. WAS THERE A FALSE READ? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N. Indicate the false read if so. Can also clean it up with Suppress, Inval, Protest, if needed.)

96. WAS THERE A FALSE ACCUSATION? _________
(2WC E/S to F/N.)

97. WAS THERE SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE METER OR CANS? _________
(False TA handling.)

98. BYPASSED CHARGE FROM SOME OTHER AUDITING ERROR? _________
(Find out what auditing action and handle with the appropriate repair list.)

99. DRUG INCIDENT RESTIMULATED? _________
(Handle with L3RH. On a Clear or above, only indicate the reads.)

(Note for C/S.)

100. WAS THERE AN OVERT ON SOME OTHER DYNAMIC? _________
(Pull the overt and handle as per steps A, B, C, etc., of False Purpose RD procedure.)

(Note for C/S to program the case for any additional Sec Check forms needed, to be done after the current form has been completed.)

101. WAS THERE AN OVERT ON SOME OTHER SUBJECT OR AREA OF LIFE? _________
(Pull the overt and handle as per steps A, B, C, etc., of False Purpose RD procedure.)

(Note for C/S to program the case for any additional Sec Check forms needed, to be done after the current form has been completed.)

102. IN THIS LIFETIME, HAVE YOU BEEN IMPLANTED BY A PSYCHIATRIST OR PRIEST? _________
(Applying the tools of Sec Checking tech, find out all of the data of the incident, including: name of implanter; the time, place, form and event of the incident; any commands that were given to pc and to what degree the pc has carried out or executed these commands and suggestions.)

(Note for C/S for further PDH follow-up actions.)

103. IN THIS LIFETIME, HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A VICTIM OF PAIN-DRUG-HYPNOSIS? _________
(Applying the tools of Sec Checking tech, find out all of the data of the incident, including: name of implanter; the time, place, form and event of the incident; any commands that were given to pc and to what degree the pc has carried out or executed these commands and suggestions.)

(Note for C/S for further PDH follow-up actions to be programed.)

104. IN THIS LIFETIME, HAVE YOU EVER BEEN DRUGGED AND THEN ELECTRIC SHOCKED WITHOUT KNOWING IT? _________
(Handle as in question #103.)

105. IN THIS LIFETIME, HAVE YOU EVER HAD A STRANGE, DESTRUCTIVE IMPULSE YOU COULDN’T ACCOUNT FOR? _________
(Handle as in question #103.)

106. IN THIS LIFETIME, WAS THERE A TIME WHEN YOU SAW A PSYCHIATRIST BUT AFTERWARD COULD NOT REMEMBER EVERYTHING THAT HAD TAKEN PLACE? _________
(Handle as in question #103.)

107. WHEN ASKED FOR AN OVERT OR EARLIER-SIMILAR OVERT, COULD YOU ONLY SEE BLACKNESS? _________
(Have the pc close his eyes and then do the following:

I. Date/Locate the overt—whatever the pc can see of it—as exactly as you can. This may blow it and result in a persistent F/N. Or it may just change the view slightly.

II. If no persistent F/N, run this command repetitive to EP: “What part of that scene you’re looking at could you be responsible for?” continuing to repeat the question no matter how many times the pc repeats the same answer and even if the pc gives you the most strained or vague answers. Run the process to F/N, cognition, VGIs.

III. If no spectacular release and persistent F/N, Sec Check the overt as per step A of the rundown and continue with steps B, C, etc.)

108. WAS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________
(If so and it doesn’t clean up on 2WC, GF M5 and handle.)

109. HAS THE UPSET BEEN HANDLED? _________
(2WC. If so, indicate it to F/N.)

The following are common errors that were made by some of the first auditors learning to audit the False Purpose Rundown. These errors can lessen or nullify results on the rundown and must be watched for closely by the C/S and thoroughly handled if they occur—by both cramming the erring auditor and repairing the pc:

1. FAILING TO VIGOROUSLY PULL THE OVERTS GOTTEN WHILE FOLLOWING DOWN THE OVERT CHAIN. Effective, no-Q&A overt pulling which nails down the overt in its entirety is a must. Patty-cake, sweaty-palmed auditors who did not master the tech of Sec Checking will not succeed with the False Purpose Rundown.

2. NOT TAKING THE OVERT CHAIN EARLIER-SIMILAR TO EARLIER OVERTS. Quite often the E/S O/W chain will go backtrack.

The evil purpose will be found to be underneath the earliest overt on that chain. This error often shows up in the auditor attempting to get off an evil purpose after having pulled only a light PT overt.

3. FAILURE TO DIRECT PROPER ETHICS HANDLING WHEN NEEDED. Ethics must be in before tech will go in. Some persons will need ethics handlings before the False Purpose RD will even begin to bite at all. Trying to “handle” someone’s PT out-ethics situation with False Purpose RD auditing alone will result in loses.

4. ATTEMPTING TO “DO THE FALSE PURPOSE RD” OVER THE TOP OF PC NATTER OR OUT-OF-SESSIONNESS OR OTHER SYMPTOMS OF MISSED WITHHOLDS. This of course comes under the heading of “auditing a pc over out ruds.”

5. QUICKYING. Example: Auditor calling a persistent F/N when there obviously is no persistent F/N present. Example: Auditor saying something was an EP which wasn’t.

6. FAILING TO PULL OFF THE PC ‘ S JUSTIFICATIONS FOR EACH OVERT AS THE CHAIN IS FOLLOWED DOWN. Includes asking for justifications just once (brush off), when the pc may need to be asked the question several times before all the justifications are gotten.

7. NOT GETTING ALL OF THE OVERT FIRST BEFORE ASKING FOR THE PC’S JUSTIFICATIONS OF THAT OVERT.

8. Q&A OFF THE O/W CHAIN, ONTO SOME OTHER O/W CHAIN OR ONTO SOMETHING ELSE.

9. BASIC OVERT PULLING ERRORS SUCH AS MISSING READS, NOT RAISING THE SENSITIVITY ON QUESTIONS, Q&A, NOT VARYING THE QUESTION OR PULLING STRINGS WHEN NEEDED, ETC.

10. NOT USING “LEFT-HAND BUTTONS” (e.g., “SUPPRESS” AND “INVALIDATE”) WHEN A FALSE PURPOSE RD FORM QUESTION DOESN’T READ, OR WHEN THE STEP B QUESTION OF THE FALSE PURPOSE RD PROCEDURE DOES NOT READ.

11. FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE WHEN BASIC ON THE OVERT CHAIN HAS BEEN REACHED AND THE CHAIN FLATTENED.

12. OVERRUNNING A SESSION OR CHAIN BY TRYING TO CARRY ON PAST A SPECTACULAR RELEASE OR PERSISTENT F/N.

13. AUDITOR NOT KNOWING WHAT AN EVIL PURPOSE OR DESTRUCTIVE INTENTION IS AND TAKING UP GOOD INTENTIONS, RANDOM STATEMENTS, COMPUTATIONS, ETC., AS “EVIL PURPOSES.” Includes failing to clear these terms thoroughly with the pc before beginning him on the rundown.

14. NOT TAKING THE EVIL PURPOSE EARLIER (to the earlier time the pc had that same evil purpose), when needed as per Step D of False Purpose RD procedure.

15. COMMANDS NOT FULLY CLEARED, AND/OR PC NOT GROOVED IN TO THE PROCEDURE SO THAT HE UNDERSTANDS WHAT IS TO BE DONE AND WHAT IS EXPECTED OF HIM.

16. PICKING UP AND ATTEMPTING TO RUN RANDOM EVIL PURPOSES THAT THE PC ORIGINATES WHILE BEING RUN DOWN A SPECIFIC CHAIN.

This rundown is a very powerful C/S tool for case advancement. Utilizing technical breakthroughs made in whole track research, it is unique in its direct approach to the handling of evil purposes and destructive intentions. It is actually a brand-new look at the subject: Guiding the pc down to basic on overt chains with thorough Sec Checking of each overt itself, then carrying through with special steps designed to blow the factors that originally prompted the overt.

C/S REQUIREMENTS

In order to C/S the False Purpose Rundown one must have successfully completed the Hubbard False Purpose Rundown Auditor Course and internship and must have graduated the Hubbard False Purpose RD C/S Course.

WHO CAN RECEIVE THE RUNDOWN

Case prerequisites for the rundown are Purification Rundown and Objectives. The only exception would be a pc who is in Case Category 4 per HCOB 12 Nov. 81RD, GRADE CHART STREAMLINED FOR LOWER GRADES: OCA all in the upper half of graph, no heavy drug history. Such a pc could be put straight onto the rundown provided he had been fully educated as a pc with a Scientology C/S-l. But the False Purpose RD is not an introductory-type action and would not ordinarily be programed on a “raw meat” case.

It would also be a mistake to program someone for the False Purpose RD whose track was heavily blocked off with drugs, as the pc needs to be able to go E/S. If the C/S has such a case on his hands, despite the person having completed a standard Purif and battery of Objectives, then a Drug RD must be done.

The False Purpose Rundown is primarily used to unstick a stalled case and get it moving up the Grade Chart again. It is not a grade or level in itself.

Where a Dianetic Clear or any pre-OT has stalled in his progress up the Bridge, the False Purpose Rundown can give him a tremendous boost in blasting through the barriers he is faced with and make it possible for him to make it on up the line to full OT.

As an example, a pc receiving HRD auditing might plow into an inability to free up on something, and not come around with handlings specific to the HRD. If through folder study and assessment of prepared lists the C/S discovers that the primary factor holding the pc back lies in the area of evil purposes in conflict with one or more of the precepts of The Way to Happiness, such a pc would need to be shifted over to the False Purpose RD—and completed on a specific False Purpose RD form—and then returned to the HRD and the HRD carried through to completion.

Another example would be a pc receiving PTS handling. Should it become evident that the pc is actually a pretended PTS (per HCOB 28 Feb. 84, C/S Series 118, PRETENDED PTS) he can be smoothly moved over onto the False Purpose RD.

The False Purpose RD is not a panacea to be used in place of other standard case debug and repair tools such as drug handlings or the Expanded GF 40. It is used when the C/S has determined that what is stalling a case is evil purposes. It is programed so as to locate and handle the evil purposes and false purposes and nonsurvival considerations, after which the pc is returned to and moved on up the Grade Chart. Some repair lists, such as the GF 40X, contain questions which can detect evil purposes on a case. Such questions reading would alert the C/S to the need to ensure that the False Purpose RD was included in the pc’s future programing.

PROGRAMING

Though the False Purpose Rundown reaches more deeply into the heart of a pc’s case than Sec Checking, and incorporates brand-new tech discoveries from whole track research, its C/Sing and programing follow the same basic C/Sing and programing rules applicable to Sec Checking.

One could for example have a case that is in the middle of a grade or level, not in any sort of ethics trouble, and running fine in session, who simply originates to a Reg that he would like to receive the False Purpose RD. The Reg and C/S would handle this as they would any pc request for a particular rundown, as per HCOB 12 Nov. 81RD, GRADE CHART STREAMLINED FOR LOWER GRADES, section “PROGRAMING.” The C/S would not interrupt the grade the pc was in the middle of and interject the False Purpose RD.

On the other hand, one could have a pc who is very evidently in need of this RD right now—not later.

In all such cases the C/S follows HCOB 28 Sept. 82, C/S Series 115, MIXING RUNDOWNS AND REPAIRS, and HCOB 13 Oct. 82, C/S Series 116, ETHICS AND THE C/S, which give the rules.

SETUPS

Before a pc is begun on the False Purpose Rundown he must be properly set up, with an F/N and VGIs.

CLEARING WORDS

The preclear must have a full understanding of the words and commands of the False Purpose Rundown. The pc has to have a very clear understanding of what is an overt, a withhold, an evil purpose, a confusion and so on.

BEGINNING THE RUNDOWN

A pc or pre-OT beginning the rundown is first put onto the False Purpose Rundown Basic Form (HCOB 14 June 84, False Purpose Rundown Series 10-A).

Other forms may be used in addition to the basic form. For example, a pc might be a field auditor in for some case cleanup and tech update; he could be programed for the False Purpose Rundown using an “auditor form.” If additional forms are used, the questions are handled per the A-G steps of the False Purpose Rundown procedure. In any case, questions are not deleted from the form.

Any form may have questions added to it by the C/S that pertain to the individual person’s background and occupation(s) and current scene (Ref: HCOB 1 Mar. 77 II, CONFESSIONAL FORMS).

ETHICS

The False Purpose RD does not take the place of standard ethics. If a person is currently involved in an out-ethics situation and is thereby harming the org or those around him in some fashion, or has gross downtrending statistics as a group member, that person should be hauled into Ethics and sorted out. Such handling might even include a rapid HCO Sec Check as a means of getting to the root of some PT situation, so that ethics can be gotten in.

Example (correct): A sum of money has been reported missing from the Treasury cash box. At the same time, staff member Pete begins insisting he must leave staff for one “reason” or another. Well, here is an obvious candidate for some pointed investigatory questioning by a skilled Sec Checker. The C/S in this case needs to get a certain set of Sec Check questions answered, fast. In this illustration it would be incorrect to embark on the False Purpose RD, as the auditor would be bound by the HCOBs to take the first question all the way through the rundown steps to persistent F/N, end session, start another session later and take up question number two, and so on. It is simply a matter for a straight HCO Confessional, get the questions answered and the overts pulled, each to F/N, and that’s it.

The False Purpose Rundown is a TECH handling. Handling tech before ethics is incorrect sequence.

Once the person has been interviewed or sec checked by an MAA, (or been before a court or committee) and physical universe handlings for any PT out-ethics have been done, or are at least in progress with the person’s ethics going in, the False Purpose RD can be used as a tool to assist him to handle the situation terminatedly. As long as ethics has gone in on the person, one can safely start him on the False Purpose RD.

Example (incorrect): Course Supervisor Elliot is found to be crashing the Academy stats, giving out verbal tech and caving in students with invalidation. Exec asks the C/S to “please get Elliot audited on the False Purpose RD right away as we must handle his destructiveness.” The C/S goes along with this. Elliot isn’t comm-eved or put through lower ethics conditions or otherwise given any ethics handling. He gets several sessions but doesn’t make any real case change. The Academy empties out. Reason: They are trying to get tech in when he is still in the ethics band. The handling is not “double the number of sessions per day he’s getting.” That would be out-sequence.

Example (correct): Betsy damaged org property and falsified an FSM commission. Turns herself in to the Ethics Officer who has her write up her O/Ws and do ethics condition formulas starting at Confusion. She works up through the conditions to Liability and writes up overts and confronts the fact that she has been out-ethics. She is, at this point, started on the False Purpose RD. Between sessions she carries on with the rest of the condition formulas, amends work, studying an ethics course, etc. The rundown is very successful. And it was successful because the sequence applied was ethics and then tech.

EP OF A SINGLE FALSE PURPOSE RD FORM

The False Purpose Rundown, similar to Sec Checking, is an unlimited process (Ref: HCOB 2 Nov. 68R, CASE SUPERVISOR CLASS VIII, THE BASIC PROCESSES). In other words, a person could receive False Purpose RD auditing any number of times, with an EP achieved for each False Purpose RD form done.

Example: Pc has had some auditing, some grades, then is inactive for a while (“falls off the Bridge”). He is involved in out-ethics, etc. He is recovered, and given False Purpose Rundown Series 10-A, the Basic Form. On completion of his auditing on this form he is doing extremely well and is ready to continue up the Bridge. He is sent to attest to completion of “False Purpose RD Basic Form.”

Example: A pc is having trouble with her marriage. She is audited on the False Purpose RD Basic Form, attests to it, and is then run on a False Purpose RD 2D Form. On completion of the 2D Form she is doing very well and her 2D situation is fully and happily resolved. She is sent to attest to completion of “False Purpose RD, Second Dynamic Form.”

When the person being audited on the False Purpose Rundown has been successfully completed on the last question of a particular form, the following indicators should be present:

1. The tone arm action has flattened off.

2. A marked shift of viewpoint accompanied by a cognition about the subject that was being sec checked, such as now being free from having to restrain oneself from committing harmful acts, etc. This would be a very big, embracive cognition, or number of them.

With these phenomena present, the pc may be sent to declare completion of that form. If they are not present, have the auditor assess a False Purpose Rundown Correction List and handle it M3 to an F/Ning list. If the EP as above is still not present, the case needs to be FESed and, taking care to use the data obtained from the correction list assessment, programed for any needed repair and then to complete that False Purpose Rundown form.

EP OF PROGRAM

Completing a whole program is a different matter than completing one form.

A stalled Dianetic Clear might, for example, have a case program that consists of several False Purpose Rundown forms (each carried to EP), followed by False Data Stripping and then Method One Word Clearing.

The overall program would be ended, and the pc sent to declare to the program, when the end phenomena of that program had been attained. This would mean achieving the end product that program was intended to achieve, as per the C/S Series HCOBs, and would include a marked rise in the person’s OCA from the range it was in before the program was begun.

AUDITOR HANDLING

The C/S must ensure that his False Purpose Rundown auditors are well trained and interned to begin with and effectively crammed on any goofs of the procedure.

A point which must be particularly watched for is the auditor’s handling of F/Ns that occur before the full EP of a chain is reached. Some auditors, accustomed to ending off an action at the first F/N, cog, VGIs will tend to end off at an F/N rather than carrying through to the full EP (persistent F/N, cog, VVGIs, evil purpose blown).

SUMMARY

With this new rundown and its direct address to factors that underlie nonsurvival conduct, the C/S is equipped to dramatically boost a pc or pre-OT on his way up the Bridge to full restoration of his power as a being.

FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN COMMANDS

The following are the commands of False Purpose Rundown procedure. The full data on each of these commands and its application is contained in HCOB 9 June 84, FPRD Series 5, AUDITING THE FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN.

STEP A: Clear, check for read and ask the question from the False Purpose RD form being used. If it reads, get the question answered fully and the overt pulled with full time, place, form and event, also pulling the pc’s justifications. This is done with full Sec Checking tech. Take this E/S as a chain of overts, down to the basic overt on the chain.

STEP B: If no spectacular release or persistent F/N, find the underlying evil purpose, using the question:

“ WAS THERE SOME EVIL PURPOSE OR DESTRUCTIVE INTENTION THAT PROMPTED YOU TO COMMIT THAT OVERT?”

STEP C: If there’s no great relief and persistent F/N from the pc spotting the evil purpose, find the confusion before it, and get the pc to spot the first moment of that prior confusion:

C1: “WAS THERE A CONFUSION THAT OCCURRED JUST BEFORE YOU HAD THE PURPOSE (the wording of the evil purpose the pc gave)?”

C2: “WHEN WAS THE FIRST MOMENT OF THAT CONFUSION?”

STEP D: If still no EP, get the earlier time he had that same exact purpose: “WAS THERE AN EARLIER TIME YOU HAD THE PURPOSE____?”

STEP E: If no EP, find the confusion prior to that time as per Steps C1 and C2 above, then proceed to Step D.

STEP F: Continue with Steps D and E as needed to get the first moment of the first confusion which led to that evil purpose.

STEP G: A False Purpose Rundown Correction List should be assessed if full EP is not reached by this point.

The False Purpose Rundown is a brand-new development in the handling of overts, withholds, evil purposes and destructive intentions. Using this new technique they are traced straight down to their origins and BLOWN.

EVIL PURPOSES

An evil purpose is a destructive purpose, intention or postulate.

I discovered in 1970 that evil purposes are the basis of insanity. A person who continuously commits harmful acts has evil purposes. He is prompted by these purposes to commit overts. (Such a person often tries to keep these overts carefully hidden while continuing to commit them.)

This does not mean that every pc who gives off an evil purpose is a raving psychotic or a John Dillinger or is bent only on destruction. It does not mean that any pc who discovers he has been dramatizing a destructive intention is an SP.

What it does mean is that this is an area that will cause (or, more likely, has already caused) a great deal of difficulty or conflict not only for the pc himself but for those around him.

POSTULATES

Evil purposes are, in effect, postulates.

Research on purposes and postulates and their role in the general aberration of a case goes back as early as 1950, and a lot of material exists on this in HCOBs and in basic Dianetics and Scientology books.

In dealing with this subject we are, in reality, dealing with a whole spectrum of what are actually postulates: considerations, intentions, purposes, service facsimiles and computations. These are all postulates.

Such false purposes, false considerations, quasi-evil purposes and the like can sit squarely in the road of attempts to hat or train or get case gain on a person.

NEW TECH BREAKTHROUGH

Underlying an overt chain you will very often find an evil purpose or destructive intention. In other words, when you start tracking down O/Ws with E/Ses keeping on a certain type of O/W, you will very likely run into an evil purpose on a case. The underlying evil purpose prompts the person to commit and continue committing harmful acts.

The breakthrough that I have made on this line is in the application of prior confusion tech to the handling of overts and evil purposes. Just as an evil purpose can be found at the bottom of a chain of overts, so can a confusion be found just prior to an evil purpose.

Once the first underlying prior confusion on that chain is located, it is only necessary to have the pc spot the FIRST MOMENT of it to cause it to blow.

AUDITOR REQUIREMENTS

A False Purpose RD Auditor must be a graduate of the new HUBBARD FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN AUDITOR COURSE and provenly competent in handling the high-precision tech of the rundown. A prerequisite to this course is the HUBBARD SENIOR SECURITY CHECKER COURSE, where one becomes a highly skilled Sec Checker. NO ONE who has not successfully completed these two courses may audit the False Purpose Rundown.

The False Purpose Rundown procedure utilizes a form that consists of a series of questions related to a specific subject or area. There are different False Purpose RD forms which the C/S may include in the pc’s program. Whatever form is used, the auditor does the whole form on the pc. Every question is cleared and checked on the meter as per basic Sec Checking tech.

Some of the questions on the form ask for overts (e.g., “Have you ever stolen materials from a school?”) and other questions ask directly for evil purposes and destructive intentions (e.g., “Have you had an evil purpose towards a school teacher?”).

Form questions which simply ask for overts are taken E/S to basic, and usually lead right to an evil purpose. (See Steps A to G below.)

On questions which directly ask for evil purposes the auditor takes up the procedure from Step C and carries through to EP.

The whole aim in doing this rundown is to locate overts and evil purposes on the case and fully blow them. These two types of Sec Check questions simply give two different approaches to one thing: getting onto the trail that leads to an evil purpose and, once found, blowing the evil purpose.

AUDITING PROCEDURE

IMPORTANT: Before the rundown is started, the pc must have a clear understanding of what is meant by an evil or destructive intention, and what a confusion and prior confusion are, as per the Technical Dictionary. The commands themselves must also be thoroughly cleared. (Ref: HCOB 9 Aug. 78 II, CLEARING COMMANDS)

On each reading Sec Check question get the question answered fully and the overt pulled with time, place, form and event and pull any justifications of the overt as part of this. This is done with full Sec Checking tech. If no persistent F/N or spectacular release on getting off the overt, go E/S on the overt chain, with each overt question being taken to basic. Just pulling an overt might resuit in a huge release and persistent F/N which would be the EP for that chain.

You may get an F/N accompanied by a cog and VGIs while going down an overt chain. An F/N indicates a release point. What occurs in a case when you get an F/N on going down an overt chain is a key-out; by pursuing it you resume the chain and can pull it down to its underlying evil purpose. It is very important in running down these overt chains that the auditor keeps the pc ON the same chain. Should the pc offer up some other overt or even an evil purpose disrelated to the chain being run, it is just noted in the worksheet for later reference. It would be an auditor error of magnitude to Q-and-A with such an origination and pursue it in the middle of handling the overt chain that was started with. (Ref: HCOB 21 Mar. 62, PREPCHECKING DATA, WHEN TO DO A WHAT)

Note: In running an overt chain E/S, the pc may spot the evil purpose that prompted the overts on that chain. If this occurs, i.e., the pc (without prompting) volunteers the evil purpose or intention that underlies that overt chain, and it is reading on the meter, the auditor goes straight to Step C.

STEP B: If running the overt E/S (to the point where there is apparently no earlier overt) does not result in a spectacular release and persistent F/N, the auditor asks:

“WAS THERE SOME EVIL PURPOSE OR DESTRUCTIVE INTENTION THAT PROMPTED YOU TO COMMIT THAT OVERT?”

and, if this reads, he pulls the evil purpose or destructive intention. The auditor is expected to put in “Suppress” and “Invalidate” if this question is not reading.

(AN “F/N AND VGIs” IS NOT THE EP BEING SOUGHT IN FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN PROCEDURE. THE EP IS A SPECTACULAR RELEASE AND A PERSISTENT F/N. THE PC SHOULD F/N ON THE E/S OVERT CHAIN ITSELF AND THE F/N SHOULD BE INDICATED, BUT THE PROCEDURE IS CONTINUED UNTIL THE FULL EP IS REACHED.)

(If this question [“Was there an evil purpose . . .”] does not read, this puts one back at Step A. The original question one started with [e.g., “Do you have an overt on cats?”] is rechecked as per standard Confessional procedure. Once that original question F/Ns on being checked, carry on with the next question listed on the False Purpose RD form.)

The purpose or intention should read when the pc gives it. If it isn’t reading, do not pursue the item with Steps C1, C2, etc.

STEP C: If there is no great relief and persistent F/N from the pc on finding the evil purpose, get the prior confusion which occurred just before that evil purpose. Then ask for and find the first moment of that prior confusion which led to that evil purpose.

This is done as follows:

C1: The auditor asks: “WAS THERE A CONFUSION THAT OCCURRED JUST BEFORE YOU HAD THE PURPOSE (the wording of the evil purpose given by the pc)?”

(Example: “Was there a confusion that occurred just before you had the purpose ‘to kill cats’?”)

and, by using the meter, the auditor finds this confusion.

C2: The auditor then asks: “WHEN WAS THE FIRST MOMENT OF THAT CONFUSION?” and gets the pc to find this.

STEP D: If there is no spectacular release and persistent F/N on finding the first moment of that prior confusion, ask the pc:

“WAS THERE AN EARLIER TIME YOU HAD THE PURPOSE (the wording of the evil purpose given by the pc)?”

(Example: “Was there an earlier time you had the purpose ‘to kill cats’?”)

and find this earlier time the pc had that purpose. What is being looked for is NOT an earlier-similar purpose, but an earlier time the pc had THAT SAME EXACT PURPOSE.

STEP E: If there is no spectacular release or persistent F/N on finding the earlier time, find the CONFUSION PRIOR TO THAT TIME as per Steps Cl and C2 above, and proceed to Step D.

STEP F: The auditor continues going earlier as per Steps D and E, until the pc has found the first moment of the first confusion which led to THAT evil
purpose.

STEP G: If all Steps A through F have been done yet there is still no spectacular release and persistent F/N, assess and handle a False Purpose RD Correction List.

STYLE OF AUDITING

The style of auditing used on the False Purpose RD is Level II, Guiding Style. The auditor must be well drilled in this style of auditing to be successful with the rundown.

GOOD INTENTIONS

ONLY evil or destructive intentions are picked up and handled in this auditing. DO NOT run good intentions.

PAST TRACK

Do not limit the pc to this lifetime when going E/S on overts or when asking for an earlier time he had that evil purpose. These chains very often go whole track.

LISTING

By following the False Purpose RD procedure exactly, the auditor should be able to easily find and pull the pc’s evil purposes. The pc is not asked listing questions, nor is L&N any part of the procedure. But it is possible that a pc could start listing and the auditor must be able to recognize and handle such a situation per standard listing tech.

Upon reviewing the session worksheets, the C/S may find that a service fac was found and F/Ned, but not fully blown. In such an instance the C/S can order the service fac run in the R3SC brackets in a later session, to fully blow it. It is the auditor’s responsibility to ensure the item reads; if it isn’t reading, it is not run. However, if one is doing a False Purpose RD Correction List and in doing so locates a reading service fac, the auditor should run it out with R3SC in that session.

REPAIR

During a chain if the auditor hits an impasse, it is expected that he would apply the appropriate Sec Checking tools right then and there to handle: Murder Routine, checking for a missed withhold, use of buttons, etc.

If there is some bog that the auditor is unable to rapidly handle using the routine Sec Check debug tools, a False Purpose Rundown Correction List should be assessed and handled.

ENDING THE SESSION

When at some point in doing these steps the pc has a spectacular release and a persistent F/N, end off the session at that point and turn the folder in to the C/S. That would be the EP for that chain and that session.

In the next session the auditor rechecks the last question run on the False Purpose RD form, and if reading, repeats Steps A to G on it. When that question no longer reads on checking, one proceeds on to the next question on the form.

SUMMARY

The importance of using this tech of purposes and considerations is immeasurable.

It can make the difference between complete failure and successful hatting; between a hell-bound existence and a pleasurable productive life.