Comments on: Deepak Chopra starts making excuses for Godhttp://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=2482
Exploring God and religion in our world todayThu, 17 Aug 2017 22:41:45 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.1By: The Messengerhttp://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=2482&cpage=10#comment-127177
Wed, 17 May 2017 20:11:31 +0000http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=2482#comment-127177Hey guys im back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
]]>By: szybkie zarabianie przez internethttp://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=2482&cpage=10#comment-127158
Wed, 17 May 2017 07:18:28 +0000http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=2482#comment-127158Umie?? linka niech ludzie czytaj?
]]>By: How Stupid Happens the Prick is Not a Science Guyhttp://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=2482&cpage=10#comment-81709
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:59:36 +0000http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=2482#comment-81709Stupid the Prick must have turned into a zombie over the holidays just like Jesus did. Lol
]]>By: DPKhttp://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=2482&cpage=10#comment-81663
Sun, 03 Jan 2016 21:11:13 +0000http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=2482#comment-81663Funny to stop back here after many months and seeing Hor still up to his old bullshit games and others still engaging him.
Here is a hint…. From an article titled “6 Signs You’re Arguing With A Psychopath”. Hor/A/Whooten/Stupid fits it to a “t”. He is the classic definition of a psychotic personality.

“Psychopaths make up one percent of the general population and, contrary to popular belief, most of them aren’t serial killers.

They’re manipulative people who intentionally cause harm to others without any sense of remorse or responsibility.

Psychopaths are social chameleons who can fit perfectly into any situation. They are experts at morphing their identities to get what they want and mirroring others for money, sex, and — most commonly — attention. Because of their ability to idealize others, psychopaths are often perceived as charming, innocent, and fun to unsuspecting onlookers and casual acquaintances.

But there is another side to them.

When they’re feeling threatened or bored, a psychopath’s true colors start to come out. They draw you into arguments that are unlike anything you’ve ever experienced. The argument usually stems from something hurtful or inappropriate they’ve done, but you’ll quickly find that you’re the one defending yourself.

Here are 6 warning signs that the person you’re arguing with is a psychopath and it’s time to disengage.

1. They lie and make excuses.

Everyone messes up every now and then, but psychopaths recite excuses more often than they follow through with promises. Their actions never match up with their words and their lies disappoint you so frequently that you actually feel relieved when they do something halfway decent. They’ve conditioned you to become grateful for mediocre treatment.

2. Their tone is condescending and patronizing.

Psychopaths often try to make you unhinged in an attempt to gain the upper hand. Throughout the entire argument, you’ll notice that they keep a calm and cool demeanor. It’s almost as if they’re mocking you — gauging your reactions to see how much further they can push. When you finally react emotionally, that’s when they’ll raise their eyebrows, smirk, tell you to calm down, or feign disappointment.

3. They employ mind-blowing hypocrisy.

In heated arguments, psychopaths have no shame and will often begin labeling you with their own horrible qualities. It goes beyond projection, because most people project unknowingly. Psychopaths know they are smearing you with their own flaws, because they are seeking a reaction. The point is to lure you in so that you react and seem “crazy” to onlookers.

4. They seem to have multiple personalities.

When arguing with a psychopath, you’re likely to notice a variety of their personas. It’s sort of like good cop, bad cop, demented cop, stalker cop, scary cop, baby cop. Once you begin pulling away from their manipulation and lies, they’ll start apologizing and flatter you. If that doesn’t work, they’ll suddenly start insulting the qualities they just flattered two minutes ago. As they struggle to regain control, you’ll be left wondering who you’re even talking to.

5. They play the eternal victim.

Somehow, their bad behavior will always lead back to a conversation about their abusive past or a crazy ex or an evil boss. You’ll end up feeling bad for them, even when they’ve done something horribly wrong. And once they’ve successfully diverted your attention, everything will get messy again. Psychopaths cry “abuse,” but, in the end, you’re the only one being abused.

6. You feel the need to explain basic human emotions to them.

You’ll find yourself attempting to explain emotions like empathy and kindness, guided by the thought that if they understand why you’re hurt, they’ll stop hurting you. You are not the first person who has attempted to see the good in them, and you will not be the last. They behave this way because they know that it hurts you.

There’s only one way out of these arguments. You need to disengage!
Arguments with psychopaths leave you drained. You might spend hours, even days, obsessing over the argument. If you think you have the perfect response to their latest outrageous comment, they planted it there on purpose. They’re trying to provoke you. They’re trying to draw you in.

In professional environments, they want you to blow up so that coworkers and superiors see you as unstable. In romantic settings, they want you to lash out so that they can use your “hysterical” reactions to show potential partners and exes how crazy you’ve become. Until we understand this, we’ll continue to fall into their trap.

So next time someone you’re arguing with uses these tactics to draw you in, try a different strategy: simply smile, nod, and go live your life.

No, its a hoax because you refuse to provide TEMP data to support your alarmist position. Therefore it is a hoax……:))

Ahahahahahahahahahaha. It would be a hoax if A could show evidence that it’s a hoax. He can’t so instead he lies about what’s been presented i.e. I have given links to all the necessary data which shows that the current bout of global warming is man made. Of course A doesn’t like the data – as it doesn’t fit with false beliefs – so he denies it’s been presented and asks for it again.

“John Cook is “the Climate Communication Fellow”

Fallacy! Appeal to authority!

Ahahahahahahahahahaha. Nowhere have I claimed that the sceptical science arguments are right simply because John Cook happens to be “the Climate Communication Fellow for the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland. He co-authored the 2011 book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand with Haydn Washington, and the 2013 college textbook Climate Change Science: A Modern Synthesis with Tom Farmer. He also lead-authored the paper Quantifying the Consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature”. No, I’ve always maintained that the arguments are correct on their own merits. That A cannot deal with those arguments on their own merits and instead resorts to ad hominem attacks on the site’s founder simply reinforces my claim.

I can provide more impressive credentials for those supporting the hoax.

A fails yet again to provide any evidence that the reality of AGW is a hoax. This is unsurprising.

John Cook is a nazi cartoonist who runs a climate alarmist blog who provided a paper that deliberately misinterpreted findings of other scientist to spread the 97% hoax. That is John Cook!!….lol!!!1

And A resorts to ad hominem because he has no response to any of the arguments advanced by those who acknowledge the reality of AGW. Again, this is unsurprising. A is singularly unable to support any of his false beliefs so he has no option but to resort to ad hominem attacks on those who can support their arguments with evidence.

“I’ve presented links to all of the data necessary to understand that the current bout of global warming”

Again wishing it so doesn’t make it so.

Which is why, unlike A, I present links to the data. He will, of course, continue to ignore any and all evidence which shows his belief to be false.

Provide the temperature data for the last 20K years that shows this unprecedented warming……(snicker)…..I keep lowing the bar for you!….lol!!!!!!

Lol, A can do his own experiment. Shouldn’t be too much trouble for a self-proclaimed “man of science”. The reason he doesn’t is because he knows he’ll be proven wrong so he keeps demanding I do it instead. However, I don’t need to as I’ve already provided ample evidence for AGW.

“Lol, A can do his experiment.”

I am not making the extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence.

Lol, neither am I. The claim is quite simple i.e. human produced CO2 emissions are the main driver behind the continuing rise in average global surface temperatures. The evidence for this is quite clear. Observed global surface temperatures are rising overall. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Greenhouse gases cause heat to be trapped in the atmosphere. Human produced CO2 is causing the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere to increase. In turn the atmosphere is trapping more heat causing the average global surface temperature to rise. Human CO2 production is causing global warming Q.E.D.

FFF aka Mousey is making the claims and the claim is crumbling right before his eyes…..lol!!!!!

Just A doing a bit of wishful thinking, lol.

You claim warming is manmade, so show us the temperature data showing the warming is manmade. Simple enough….(snicker)

Mousey is making the claims and the claim is crumbling right before his eyes

Here is a real study:

“Nearly six in ten climate scientists don’t adhere to the so-called “consensus” on man-made climate change, a new study by the Dutch government has found.”

Um, like when YOU reference the Dutch government?
See what happens when you don’t think. It appears that “How Stupid Happens” suits your latest persona rather well. (snicker)

]]>By: How Stupid Happenshttp://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=2482&cpage=10#comment-81421
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 16:41:16 +0000http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=2482#comment-81421” still thinks that if he says “hoax” enough people will believe”

No, its a hoax because you refuse to provide TEMP data to support your alarmist position. Therefore it is a hoax……:))

“John Cook is “the Climate Communication Fellow”

Fallacy! Appeal to authority! I can provide more impressive credentials for those supporting the hoax. John Cook is a nazi cartoonist who runs a climate alarmist blog who provided a paper that deliberately misinterpreted findings of other scientist to spread the 97% hoax. That is John Cook!!….lol!!!1

“I’ve presented links to all of the data necessary to understand that the current bout of global warming”

Again wishing it so doesn’t make it so. Provide the temperature data for the last 20K years that shows this unprecedented warming……(snicker)…..I keep lowing the bar for you!….lol!!!!!!

“Lol, A can do his experiment.”

I am not making the extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence. FFF aka Mousey is making the claims and the claim is crumbling right before his eyes…..lol!!!!!

You claim warming is manmade, so show us the temperature data showing the warming is manmade. Simple enough….(snicker)

“someone else’s ad hominem that implied the site was wrong because John Cook was once a cartoonist”

Hmmm, never knew being a cartoonist was ad homenim.

Lol, A shows once more that he’s wilfully ignorant about what an ad hominem is. No wonder he keeps presenting them as his “evidence”.

However, a cartoonist does not a climate scientist make and we know FFF/Mouse insists one a be a climate scientist before he will accept the hoax claims….

Lol, A still thinks that if he says “hoax” enough people will believe there is one. They won’t.

lol!!!!!!!!! The truth is John Cook is an alarmist nazi who is a cartoonist….:))

Lol, John Cook is “the Climate Communication Fellow for the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland. He co-authored the 2011 book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand with Haydn Washington, and the 2013 college textbook Climate Change Science: A Modern Synthesis with Tom Farmer. He also lead-authored the paper Quantifying the Consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature”.

“Lol, an almost astrophysicist attempts to deny the existence of the greenhouse effect”

No, he is not a nazi cartoonist but he never denies COs exists.

Lol, no-one ever claimed he did. As usual A deliberately misunderstands what I’ve written because he can’t actually deal with it honestly.

He inetead shows it does not have the impact cartoonist claim…….as do many climatologist.

As usual A can’t even explain what the dreck he posted was supposed to achieve. Postma’s whole beef was that a simple model wasn’t accurate enough and somehow that means there’s no greenhouse effect, lol.

OOOPS, turns out many of the weather stations are now inaccurate…..ouch!, the hoax is becoming more exposed……:))

Note how A utterly fails to back up this claim. How many is “many”? What does he mean by “inaccurate”? Who is making this claim etc…? Instead of giving actual details he thinks simply saying it makes it so. Hardly a surprise given his “wishing makes it so” worldview.

“He just needs to pick a point on the globe and show how the 100k year temperature record for that point disproves recent AGW.”

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!FFF needs to prove his manmade warming hoax…..we do not accept hoax unless proven with the data……!, now if we have data of warming then that would prove global warming, yes?….lol!!!!! tell ya what, take 50K years of temperature data and show us the warming…..Very simple, we do have the data, yes???

Yes, we have the data. I’ve presented links to all of the data necessary to understand that the current bout of global warming is a result of human produced CO2 emissions. A refuses to accept the data because it disagree with his false beliefs – something he does every time science disagrees with him. Instead he shoves his head in the sand and desperately tries to call it all a hoax.

“ver the last century and a half the average temperature has risen much faster as human produced carbon emissions”

Actually they have not.

A denying reality as usual.

But, tell ya what. Show us temp data for the last 50K years showing this huge spike in warming……then we all can believe!!!!……lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111

Lol, A can do his own experiment. Shouldn’t be too much trouble for a self-proclaimed “man of science”. The reason he doesn’t is because he knows he’ll be proven wrong so he keeps demanding I do it instead. However, I don’t need to as I’ve already provided ample evidence for AGW.

“I’m posting under multiple different names”

I know…..I know……..::))

And he finishes with the usual dose of rank dishonesty. So predictable.