Upayavira wrote:
>
> I couldn't agree more. Personally I'd be -1 on porting ECM++ back to
> 2.1.x. 2.1.x should be a _maintenance_ branch, and unless we can focus
> on getting 2.2 out in some form, we risk some serious geopardy for our
> community, I think.
>
> So, let's release 2.2, make that the main branch, and start adding
> OSGi, Maven, etc, into 2.3. \
I really think we should get into the mindset that the branch with real
blocks and OSGi will be 3.0.
>
> With Carsten's proposal to release every two months, we're almost back
> into release early, release often, but, problem is, we'd be releasing
> a branch often, which is seriously broken, IMO.
>
> I'd say, let's release 2.2M1 at the same time as 2.1.8, say, just
> after the GetTogether.
+1 - If Carsten (or whomever) can move ECM++ by then.
>
> Regards, Upayavira
Ralph