I don’t know that I’ll have time to say as much about this issue as I’d like. Am traveling now for a family celebration.

A lot of conservative and libertarian pundits and bloggers have offered a lot of thoughtful commentary on the topic, starting (well, from my vantage point) with Peggy Noonan last week. Powerline, Hugh Hewitt, the Anchoress, Cato @ Liberty and the Corner have been good sources. (This, for example, is a particularly good post. As is this*.)

I don’t know that I can add much to what they’ve been saying, but am troubled that our friends in the legacy media are calling this a social issue. It’s not. It’s a freedom issue.

The basic question is should a private organization be able to determine the type of benefits it offers its employees. A liberal administration is now trying to force religious organizations to pay for benefits supported by advocacy groups aligned with the Democrats. By the same logic, a conservative administration could try to force private groups (say, universities) to offer (or not offer) benefits supported by advocacy groups aligned with Democrats.

It’s one more example of the government limiting our choices — which gets at the real problem of Obamacare, the federal government determining what a health insurance plan should include. The more it mandates, the fewer options individuals have to choose from.

The fewer different kind of plans there are, the more uniform the price.

From the Corner, we learn not just that Rick Santorum endorsed Arlen Specter’s presidential bid, but that he also “voted to confirm Sonia Sotomayor to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals”. When he sat on the Republican side of the aisle (before flipping to the Democratic in a vain attempt to save his political skin, Specter was one of the most liberal Republicans in the Senate).