um....you do realize that "good" review was given orally from the 13 year old son of the actor who plays Darryl on the TV show "The Walking Dead", right? You know, AMC, the thing thats plastered all over the game's box art?

13 year old gamer....interpreted retelling of his review third hand....from a guy who works on the show?

um....you do realize that "good" review was given orally from the 13 year old son of the actor who plays Darryl on the TV show "The Walking Dead", right? You know, AMC, the thing thats plastered all over the game's box art?

13 year old gamer....interpreted retelling of his review third hand....from a guy who works on the show?

"The game’s hard, and it’s really scary actually for a video game. He was playing it, and he was like ‘Turn on the lights!’”

Man that's deep, so many details.

Click to expand...

Still deeper than IGN. Double Dragon: Neon anybody?

Click to expand...

At least IGN get's into the nitty gritty like a review is supposed to do and gives details about the mechanics among various other aspects and what the reviewer may or may not have liked about each of those things.

That's a lot better than some guy saying, This game was so much fun, I had an awesome time playing it, it was intense..

um....you do realize that "good" review was given orally from the 13 year old son of the actor who plays Darryl on the TV show "The Walking Dead", right? You know, AMC, the thing thats plastered all over the game's box art?

13 year old gamer....interpreted retelling of his review third hand....from a guy who works on the show?

Yea, sorry, i take this with a grain of salt

Click to expand...

An IGN editor had his kids review Kinect Party.

Click to expand...

Did that IGN editor work for Microsoft? Did that IGN editor just give a third hand account of what his kids said about the game in passing...or did he actually have them sit down and write a proper review that he edited?

"The game’s hard, and it’s really scary actually for a video game. He was playing it, and he was like ‘Turn on the lights!’”

Man that's deep, so many details.

Click to expand...

Still deeper than IGN. Double Dragon: Neon anybody?

Click to expand...

At least IGN get's into the nitty gritty like a review is supposed to do and gives details about the mechanics among various other aspects and what the reviewer may or may not have liked about each of those things.

That's a lot better than some guy saying, This game was so much fun, I had an awesome time playing it, it was intense..

Click to expand...

Did you read the Double Dragon: Neon review? Mitch denounced it because it was an old school beat em' up.

Remember when arcade beat-‘em-ups were deliberately too difficult so you’d pay to keep playing? How about when failure meant having to replay an entire level? It’s a good thing those days are over – and it’s too bad Double Dragon: Neon doesn’t realize it.Double Dragon: Neon is the embodiment of what’s wrong with HD remakes. It’s afraid to let go of the ‘80s altar it worships at, even if it means cramming a crummy, archaic experience down players’ throats. Rather than remind players what they loved about the series, Neon reminds them why the arcade is dead.

um....you do realize that "good" review was given orally from the 13 year old son of the actor who plays Darryl on the TV show "The Walking Dead", right? You know, AMC, the thing thats plastered all over the game's box art?

13 year old gamer....interpreted retelling of his review third hand....from a guy who works on the show?

At least IGN get's into the nitty gritty like a review is supposed to do and gives details about the mechanics among various other aspects and what the reviewer may or may not have liked about each of those things.

That's a lot better than some guy saying, This game was so much fun, I had an awesome time playing it, it was intense..

Click to expand...

Did you read the Double Dragon: Neon review? Mitch denounced it because it was an old school beat em' up.

Remember when arcade beat-‘em-ups were deliberately too difficult so you’d pay to keep playing? How about when failure meant having to replay an entire level? It’s a good thing those days are over – and it’s too bad Double Dragon: Neon doesn’t realize it.Double Dragon: Neon is the embodiment of what’s wrong with HD remakes. It’s afraid to let go of the ‘80s altar it worships at, even if it means cramming a crummy, archaic experience down players’ throats. Rather than remind players what they loved about the series, Neon reminds them why the arcade is dead.

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Pointing out one bad review written by one individual isn't really a good point.

At least IGN get's into the nitty gritty like a review is supposed to do and gives details about the mechanics among various other aspects and what the reviewer may or may not have liked about each of those things.

That's a lot better than some guy saying, This game was so much fun, I had an awesome time playing it, it was intense..

Click to expand...

Did you read the Double Dragon: Neon review? Mitch denounced it because it was an old school beat em' up.

Remember when arcade beat-‘em-ups were deliberately too difficult so you’d pay to keep playing? How about when failure meant having to replay an entire level? It’s a good thing those days are over – and it’s too bad Double Dragon: Neon doesn’t realize it.Double Dragon: Neon is the embodiment of what’s wrong with HD remakes. It’s afraid to let go of the ‘80s altar it worships at, even if it means cramming a crummy, archaic experience down players’ throats. Rather than remind players what they loved about the series, Neon reminds them why the arcade is dead.

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Pointing out one bad review written by one individual isn't really a good point.

Remember when Papillion in the "Aliens: Colonial Marines" thread said he was playing the game and it was fantastic...and that anyone in that thread who said the graphics and animation were dated and horrible looking, straight out of 1998.... were "morons"? Remember that?

Remember when Papillion in the "Aliens: Colonial Marines" thread said he was playing the game and it was fantastic...and that anyone in that thread who said the graphics and animation were dated and horrible looking, straight out of 1998.... were "morons"? Remember that?

You will be the Papillion of "Walking Dead: Survival Instinct"

Click to expand...

Fine. Let's make a bet: If the game is good, I get a free week to spam +1 posts. If it sucks, then I'll make a thread with me apologizing about hyping the shit out of the game.

Remember when Papillion in the "Aliens: Colonial Marines" thread said he was playing the game and it was fantastic...and that anyone in that thread who said the graphics and animation were dated and horrible looking, straight out of 1998.... were "morons"? Remember that?

You will be the Papillion of "Walking Dead: Survival Instinct"

Click to expand...

Fine. Let's make a bet: If the game is good, I get a free week to spam +1 posts. If it sucks, then I'll make a thread with me apologizing about hyping the shit out of the game.

Remember when Papillion in the "Aliens: Colonial Marines" thread said he was playing the game and it was fantastic...and that anyone in that thread who said the graphics and animation were dated and horrible looking, straight out of 1998.... were "morons"? Remember that?

You will be the Papillion of "Walking Dead: Survival Instinct"

Click to expand...

Fine. Let's make a bet: If the game is good, I get a free week to spam +1 posts. If it sucks, then I'll make a thread with me apologizing about hyping the shit out of the game.