QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-24230

ENERGY FOCUS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

94-3021850

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

32000 Aurora Rd., Solon, OH
(Address of principal executive offices)

44139
(Zip Code)

(Registrants telephone number, including area code): (440) 715-1300

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer þ
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The number of outstanding shares of the registrants Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, as of April
28, 2011 was 24,756,517.

Energy Focus, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) engage in the design, development,
manufacturing, marketing, and installation of energy-efficient lighting systems and solutions where
the Company serves two segments:

product-based sales providing military, general commercial and industrial lighting and
pool lighting offerings, each of which markets and sells energy-efficient lighting systems.

The Company continues to evolve its business strategy to include providing its customers with
turnkey, comprehensive energy-efficient lighting solutions, which use, but are not limited to, its
patented and proprietary technology. Company product-based solutions include light-emitting diode
(LED), fiber optic, high-intensity discharge (HID), fluorescent tube and other highly
energy-efficient lighting technologies. Typical savings related to the current technology of the
Company approximates 80% in electricity costs, while providing full-spectrum light closely
simulating daylight colors. The Companys strategy also incorporates continued investment into the
research of new and emerging energy sources including, but not limited to, LED and solar energy
applications.

The Companys development of solar technology continues through its role in the United States
Governments Very High Efficiency Solar Cell (VHESC) Consortium sponsored by the Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The goal of the VHESC project is to develop a 40% or greater
efficient solar cell for United States military applications, which would also ultimately become
available to the public for commercial application.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The significant accounting policies of the Company, which are summarized below, are consistent with
generally accepted accounting principles and reflect practices appropriate to the business in which
it operates.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Estimates include, but are not limited to, the establishment of reserves for accounts receivable,
sales returns, inventory obsolescence, and warranty claims; the useful lives for property,
equipment, and intangible assets; revenues recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis; and
stock-based compensation. In addition, estimates and assumptions associated with the determination
of fair value of financial instruments and evaluation of goodwill and long-lived assets for
impairment requires considerable judgment. Actual results could differ from those estimates and
such differences could be material.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified within the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (financial statements), and related notes thereto, to be consistent with the current
year presentation.

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, Stones River
Companies, LLC (SRC) in Nashville, Tennessee, and Crescent Lighting Limited (CLL) located in
the United Kingdom. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Interim Financial Statements (unaudited)

Although unaudited, the interim financial statements in this report reflect all adjustments,
consisting only of all normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the
interim periods covered and of the financial condition of the Company at the interim balance sheet
date. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative
of the results expected for the entire year.

The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue
to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of
liabilities in the normal course of business. The interim financial statements do not include any
adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of
assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from uncertainty related to
the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.

Year-end Balance Sheet

The year-end balance sheet information was derived from audited financial statements but does not
include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited financial statements and notes
thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010, which are contained in the Companys 2010 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued revisions to the accounting
guidance related to troubled debt restructuring. This new guidance is effective for the first
interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively
to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. While we are currently evaluating the effect
this new guidance may have on our financial statements, we do not believe that it will have a
material effect on its consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Companys international subsidiary uses its local currency as its functional currency. Assets
and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and income and
expense accounts are translated at average exchange rates during the year. Resulting translation
adjustments are recorded directly to Accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders
equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included as a component of Other income
(expense). Gains and losses from foreign currency translation are included as a separate
component of Other comprehensive loss within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Liquidity

Historically, the Company has incurred losses attributable to operational performance which have
negatively impacted cash flows. Although management continues to address many of the legacy issues
that have historically burdened the Companys financial performance, the Company still faces
challenges in order to reach profitability. In order for the Company to attain profitability and
growth, the Company will need to successfully address these challenges, including the continuation
of cost reductions throughout the organization, execution of its marketing and sales plans for the
Companys turnkey energy-efficient lighting solutions business, the development of new technologies
into sustainable product lines and continued improvements in supply chain performance.

The Company is optimistic about obtaining the funding necessary to meet on-going tactical and
strategic capital requirements. However, there can be no assurances that this objective will be
successful. As such, the Company will continue to review and pursue selected external funding
sources, if necessary, to execute these objectives including the following:

loans or other debt instruments may have terms and/or conditions, such as interest rate,
restrictive covenants, and control or revocation provisions, which are not acceptable to
management or the Board of Directors,



the current economic environment combined with the Companys capital constraints may
prevent the Company from being able to obtain any debt financing,



financing may not be available for parties interested in pursuing the acquisition of one
or more operating units of the Company, and

additional equity financing may not be available in the current economic environment and
could lead to further dilution of shareholder value for current shareholders of record.

Retainage Receivable

The Companys solutions-based sales are normally subject to a holdback of a percentage of the sale
as retainage. This holdback is recorded on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as
Retainage receivable. Retainage is a portion of the total bid price of a project that is held
back by the customer until the project is complete and functioning satisfactorily according to the
contract terms. Retainage percentages typically range from 5% to 10% and are collected anywhere
from three to eighteen months from the inception of the project.

Collateralized Assets

The Company maintains $2,000,000 of cash collateral related to the Companys $10,000,000 surety
bonding program associated with SRC. This cash is pledged to the surety carrier through December
2011, unless the Company is able to provide sufficient alternative means of collateralization
satisfactory to the surety carrier.

Earnings (Loss) per Share

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is
computed giving effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the
period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of incremental shares upon exercise of stock
options and warrants, unless the effect would be anti-dilutive.

A reconciliation of basic and diluted loss per share is provided as follows (in thousands, except
per share amounts):

Three months ended

March 31,

2011

2010

Basic and diluted loss per share:

Net loss

$

(2,813

)

$

(3,570

)

Basic and diluted loss per share:

Weighted average shares outstanding

24,224

21,270

Basic and diluted net loss per share

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.17

)

At March 31, 2011 and 2010, options and warrants to purchase 5,619,000 and 7,963,000 shares of
common stock, respectively, were outstanding, but were not included in the calculation of diluted
net loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Companys stock-based compensation plan is described in detail in its Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The following table summarizes the Companys
stock-based compensation (in thousands):

Total unearned compensation of $847,000 related to stock options remains at March 31, 2011 compared
to $1,444,000 at March 31, 2010. These costs will be charged to expense, amortized on a straight
line basis, in future periods through the first quarter of 2015. The remaining weighted average
life of the outstanding options is approximately 2.0 years.

The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. Estimates utilized in the calculation include the expected life of option,
risk-free interest rate, and expected volatility, and are further comparatively detailed as
follows:

Three months ended

March 31,

2011

2010

Fair value of options issued

$

0.76

$

0.70

Exercise price

$

1.07

$

1.02

Expected life of option

4.0 years

4.0 years

Risk-free interest rate

1.50

%

1.86

%

Expected volatility

104.52

%

97.40

%

Dividend yield

0

%

0

%

At the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Annual Meeting) held on June 16, 2010, the
shareholders approved an increase in the total number of shares of common stock that may be awarded
under the 2008 Incentive Stock Plan from 1,000,000 shares to 3,000,000 shares. Under this plan,
the Company granted 615,000 stock options through the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 910,000
during the three months ended March 31, 2010. Of the 910,000 stock options granted in 2010,
900,000 were performance-based stock options exercisable by the grantees if, and only if, the
Company achieves required revenue and cash-flow generation targets as reported in the Companys
2010 Form 10-K. The Companys performance in 2010 did not meet most of these established
performance goals and, consequently, 850,000 of these performance-based stock options were
cancelled on April 1, 2011.

In the third quarter of 2010, the Board of Directors approved a program offering the independent
Directors of the Company the option of accepting restricted shares of the Companys common stock in
lieu of quarterly cash compensation. Directors who chose to participate and accept restricted
shares in lieu of cash compensation would receive the equivalent of two dollars ($2.00) of Company
common stock for every one dollar ($1.00) of their normal cash compensation. Directors that chose
to accept this program agreed to receive restricted shares as compensation for four consecutive
quarters, covering the period of July 2010 until June 2011 with the aforementioned common stock
vesting over an equivalent 12 month period. The price of the common stock shares was based on the
closing price of the Companys common stock on September 20, 2010. On September 1, 2010, four of
the five Directors agreed to participate in this program and, subsequently, the participants were
issued 123,000 shares of restricted common stock. Director stock compensation expense under this
program amounted to $54,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 related to these restricted
shares.

On May 29, 2009, the Companys five senior executive officers agreed to accept voluntary salary
reductions for the remainder of the 2009 calendar year in exchange for the issuance of restricted
shares of common stock as authorized under the Companys 2008 Incentive Stock Plan. Two other key
executives of the Company also accepted salary reductions for the balance of the year in exchange
for restricted shares. Each officer and key executive voluntarily accepted a ten percent (10%)
salary reduction for the remainder of 2009, except for one officer who voluntarily accepted a forty
percent (40%) decrease for the remainder of 2009. The number of restricted shares of common stock
issued to each officer and executive was equal to the dollar value of the individuals salary
reduction divided by the closing price per share of the Companys common stock on May 29, 2009.
The total number of restricted shares of common stock issued to these officers and executives was
209,000. The Company reserved the right to extend
these salary reductions into the 2010 calendar year and beyond. Additionally, on May 29, 2009, two
members of the Companys Board of Directors voluntarily relinquished their directors fee for the
balance of 2009 in exchange for restricted shares of common stock on the same terms as the shares
granted to the officers. The number of restricted shares of common stock issued to each director
was equal to the dollar value of the individuals relinquished directors fee divided by the
closing price per share of the Companys common stock on May 29, 2009. The total number of
restricted shares of common stock issued to these directors was 19,000.

On December 31, 2009, the Companys five executive officers, along with two other key executives of
the Company, agreed to extend these salary reductions through June 30, 2010. On July 9, 2010, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer, with the approval of the Board of Directors, decided to continue
the cash salary reductions through December 31, 2010. Each executive officer and key executive
voluntarily accepted a 10% salary reduction for 2010, except for one executive officer who
voluntarily accepted a 40% decrease for 2010. The number of restricted shares of Common Stock
issued to each executive officer and key executive was equal to the dollar value of the
individuals salary reduction divided by the closing price per share of the Companys Common Stock
on December 30, 2009 and January 3, 2011, respectively. The total number of restricted shares of
Common Stock issued to these officers and executives in 2010 was 284,000. The Company recorded
compensation expense of $55,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 related to these restricted
shares.

Product Warranties

The Company warrants finished goods against defects in material and workmanship under normal use
and service for periods of one to three years for products and labor. Settlement costs consist of
actual amounts expensed for warranty services which are largely a result of third-party service
calls, and the costs of replacement products. A liability for the estimated future costs under
product warranties is maintained for products outstanding under warranty and is included in
Accrued liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The warranty activity for the
respective years is as follows (in thousands):

Three months ended

March 31,

2011

2010

Balance at the beginning of the period

$

126

$

211

Accruals for warranties issued

7

(5

)

Settlements made during the period (in cash or in
kind)

(17

)

(20

)

Balance at the end of the period

$

116

$

186

NOTE 3. INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (which approximates actual cost determined
using the first-in, first-out cost method) or market and consist of the following (in thousands):

Amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization was $162,000 and 268,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company amortizes Tradenames on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the intangible assets. Customer
relationships are amortized over their expected useful lives on an accelerated method that
approximates the cash flows associated with those relationships. Based on the carrying value of
amortized intangible assets the Company estimates amortization expense for future years to be as
follows (in thousands):

Year ending December 31,

Amount

2012

$

420

2013

253

2014

105

2015

50

2016 and thereafter

200

Total amortization expense

$

1,028

As of March 31, 2011, the Company had $672,000 of goodwill recorded on its financial statements
related to the acquisition of SRC.

Costs and estimated earnings on contracts in progress as of the periods indicated are summarized in
the following table (in thousands):

March 31,

December 31,

2011

2010

Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts

$

11,820

$

9,912

Estimated earnings

3,767

3,138

Total revenues

15,587

13,050

Less: billings to date

15,702

13,325

Total

$

(115

)

$

(275

)

Balance sheet classification:

Costs in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts

$

67

$

22

Billings in excess of costs on uncompleted contracts

(182

)

(297

)

Total

$

(115

)

$

(275

)

NOTE 7. LONG-TERM BORROWINGS

On May 27, 2009, the Company entered into an unsecured promissory note (the Note) with The
Quercus Trust (Quercus) in the amount of $70,000. Under the terms of this Note, the Company is
obligated to pay The Trust the principal sum of the Note and interest accruing at a yearly rate of
1.00% in one lump sum payment on or before June 1, 2109. The Company received these funds on June
9, 2009.

On December 29, 2009 and in conjunction with the acquisition of SRC, the Company entered into
Letter of Credit Agreements (LOCs) with John Davenport, President of the Company, and with
Quercus, for $250,000 and $300,000, respectively. These LOCs have terms of 24 months and bear
interest at a rate of 12.5% on the face amount. The LOCs are collateralized by 15% and 18%,
respectively, of the capital stock of Crescent Lighting Ltd., which in turn is based on CLLs net
worth as of November 30, 2009 and are subordinated to the senior indebtedness of the Company and
CLL. As an incentive to enter into the LOCs, the Company issued five-year, detached warrants to
purchase 125,000 and 150,000 shares, respectively, of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01
per share. The Companys shareholders approved the warrants at the Annual Meeting on June 16,
2010.

In conjunction with the acquisition of SRC on December 31, 2009, the Company entered into an
agreement with TLC Investments, LLC (TLC), whereby a Convertible Promissory Note (Convertible
Note) was issued for the principal amount of $500,000. This Convertible Note bears interest at
the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus two percent (2%), which along with the principal, is due
and payable on June 30, 2013 (maturity date). This Convertible Note is secured by a
first-lien-position security interest in all assets of SRC. Additionally, TLC has the right to
convert the principal of the Convertible Note, in whole, but not in part, into 500,000 shares of
our common stock at any time during the period commencing on June 30, 2010 and through the maturity
date. Additionally, as a provision to the Convertible Note, if the reported closing price of a
share of common stock of the Company is not equal to or greater than $2.00 for at least twenty (20)
trading days between June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2013, we shall pay TLC an additional fee of
$500,000 on the maturity date. The Company accrued for this potential fee at the time of the
agreement.

On March 30, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with EF Energy Partners LLC (EF Energy),
an Ohio limited liability company, under which it sold to EF Energy a Secured Subordinated
Promissory Note (Subordinated Note) for the principal amount
of $1,150,000. The Company secured the full amount of this financing with a pledge of its United
States gross accounts receivable and selected capital equipment. This Subordinated Note bears
interest at a rate of 12.5%, which is payable quarterly, in arrears, commencing September 30, 2010.
The entire outstanding principal balance of this Subordinated Note, together with all accrued
interest thereon, is due and payable on March 30, 2013. Additionally, the Company issued to the
eight investors in EF Energy five-year, detached penny warrants ($.01 per share) to purchase
shares of its common stock at a rate of 0.2 warrants per dollar of financing, or 230,000 warrants,
with an expiration date of March 30, 2015. The Company and EF Energy Partners are not related.

Through its United Kingdom subsidiary, the Company maintains a British pounds sterling-denominated
bank overdraft facility with Lloyds Bank Plc, in the amount of $402,000, based on the exchange rate
at March 31, 2011. There were no borrowings against this facility as of March 31, 2011 or December
31, 2010. This facility is renewed annually on January 1. The interest rate on the facility was
2.75% at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.

Future maturities of remaining borrowings are (in thousands):

Long-Term

Year ending December 31,

Borrowings

2011

$

550

2012



2013

1,650

2014



2015



2016 and thereafter

70

Gross long-term borrowings

2,270

Less: discounts on long-term borrowings

(389

)

Total commitment, net

1,881

Less: portion classified as current

(498

)

Long-term borrowings, net

$

1,383

NOTE 8. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as net income (loss) plus sales, expenses, gains, and losses
that, under generally accepted accounting principles, are included in comprehensive income (loss)
but excluded from net income (loss). A separate statement of comprehensive loss has been presented
with this report.

The Company has two reportable segments: product-based sales featuring pool lighting and general
commercial lighting, each of which markets and sells lighting systems, and solutions-based sales
providing turnkey, high-quality, energy-efficient lighting application alternatives. The Companys
products are sold through a combination of direct sales employees, independent sales
representatives, and various distributors in different geographic markets throughout the world.
The Companys solutions-based sales are designed to enhance total value by positively impacting
customers profitability, the environment, and the communities it serves. These solutions are sold
through our direct sales employees as well as our SRC subsidiary, and include not only the
Companys proprietary energy-efficient lighting solutions, but also sourced lighting systems,
energy audits, and service agreements.

The following summarizes the Companys reportable segment data for periods indicated (in
thousands):

The following table provides additional business unit gross profitability detail for the Companys
Products-based business segment for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three months ended

March 31,

2011

2010

Products segment net sales:

Pool and commercial products

$

2,348

$

2,506

Government products/R&D services

510

571

Total products segment net sales

2,858

3,077

Products segment cost of sales:

Pool and commercial products

1,800

1,537

Government products/R&D services

448

571

Unallocated manufacturing overhead



567

Total products segment cost of sales

2,248

2,675

Products segment gross profit:

Pool and commercial products

548

969

Government products/R&D services

62



Unallocated manufacturing overhead



(567

)

Total products segment gross profit

$

610

$

402

Unallocated manufacturing overhead is defined as follows:

1)

costs associated with the operation and shut down of the Solon manufacturing facility
which has been relocated to the Mexico facility and

2)

specific expenses which are not attributable to a specific business unit but rather are
calculated on the total products business segment. Expenses include Solon manufacturing
facility rent, Solon manufacturing depreciation, inventory reserves and accruals and Solon
manufacturing support payroll and severance.

A geographic summary of net sales from continuing operations is as follows (in thousands):

Three months ended

March 31,

2011

2010

United States

$

4,553

$

7,284

International

907

1,073

Net sales from continuing operations

$

5,460

$

8,357

A geographic summary of long-lived assets, which consists of fixed assets, goodwill, and intangible
assets, is as follows (in thousands):

At March 31, 2011, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax
asset in the United States, due to uncertainties related to the Companys ability to utilize its
deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of certain net operating losses carried forward. The
valuation allowance is based upon the Companys estimates of taxable income by jurisdiction and
the period over which its deferred tax assets will be recoverable.

NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company and its landlord for the Solon, Ohio office, located
at 32000 Aurora Road, signed a non-binding term sheet that will resolve past due amounts under the
current lease agreement, set to expire April 30, 2011, as well as the basic terms by which the
Company and its landlord will enter into an extension of the current lease. The term sheet
includes a reduction of the gross rent to $25,000 for the period September 1, 2010 to April 30,
2011 (the period), an extension of the lease until April 30, 2014 with a Company option to extend
thereafter and a reduction in both the square footage of the premises and the gross rent per square
foot to be paid from May 1, 2011 to April 30, 2014. In conjunction with the signing of the lease
agreement term sheet and to satisfy past due amounts, the Company will deliver an unsecured
promissory note to the landlord in the amount of approximately $676,000 which will bear interest at
a rate of 10% annually commencing May 1, 2011 and have a maturity date of April 30, 2014. In
addition, the Company made a payment of approximately $121,000 on May 9, 2011, not subject to
interest, and the Company made gross rent payments of $200,000 during the period, which reduced the
balance of the note to $355,000.

In connection with the acquisition of SRC, the Company maintains a performance-related contingent
obligation related to a 2.5% payout based upon the annual revenues of the acquired business over 42
months commencing January 1, 2010, and a $500,000 fee if the market price of the Companys common
stock is not equal to or greater than $2.00 per share for at least twenty trading days between June
30, 2010 and June 30, 2013. The Company accrued for this potential fee at the time of the
agreement. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company has paid $110,000 and
$126,000, respectively, relating to this 2.5% payout.

NOTE 12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On March 14, 2008, the Company received an additional $9,335,000 in equity financing, net of
expenses. The investment was made by several then current Energy Focus, Inc. shareholders,
including four then current members of the Companys Board of Directors. These investors agreed to
an at-market purchase of approximately 3.1 million units for $3.205 per unit, based on the closing
bid price of the Companys common shares on March 13, 2008 of $3.08. Each unit comprises one share
of the Companys common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and one warrant to purchase one share
of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $3.08 per share. The warrants were
immediately separable from the units and immediately exercisable, and will expire five years after
the date of their issuance. This additional financing was to be used to fund working capital, pay
debt and perform additional research and development. The Company received 100% of the funds from
escrow on March 17, 2008. Among the investors were Ronald A. Casentini, John M. Davenport, John B.
Stuppin, and Philip E. Wolfson, all of whom were members of its Board of Directors at the time of
the transaction, and who invested approximately $100,000 in the aggregate. Also among the
investors was Quercus, whose trustees include David Gelbaum, who was a member of the Companys
Board of Directors in 2009.

On May 27, 2009, the Company entered into a Promissory Note with Quercus in the amount of $70,000.
David Gelbaum, a trustee of Quercus, was a member of the Companys Board of Directors at the time
of the transaction. Please refer to Note 5, Long-Term Borrowings, for a discussion of the terms of
the Promissory Note.

In November, 2009, the Company received an additional $3,344,000 in equity financing, net of
expenses by selling 4,813,000 shares of common stock in a registered offering. The investment was
made by numerous current Energy Focus shareholders, including two then current members of the
Companys Board of Directors. The investment was made under the Companys registration statement
for a $3,500,000 common stock subscription rights offering. Under the terms of the rights
offering, the Company distributed, at no charge to its shareholders, transferable rights to
purchase up to $3.5 million of the Companys common stock at the established subscription price per
share of $0.75, which was set by the Companys Board of Directors. At the time the offering began,
the Company distributed to each shareholder one transferable right for each share of common stock
owned by the shareholder. Each right entitled the holder to purchase one share of the Companys
common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, subject to a maximum of 4,600,000 shares to be issued in
the offering. Shareholders were entitled to subscribe for shares not subscribed for by other
shareholders. Among the investors were Philip E. Wolfson, a member of the Companys Board of
Directors at the time of the transaction, and who invested approximately $8,000 in the aggregate.
Also among the investors was Quercus, whose trustees include David Gelbaum, who was a member of the
Companys Board of Directors at the time of the offering.

In the Companys subscription rights offering discussed above, an investor inadvertently purchased
1,000,000 shares of our common stock at $0.75 per share. The Company agreed to facilitate the sale
of these shares to another shareholder or investor or to purchase them directly. A purchase of
those shares by the Company would have severely depleted its cash-on-hand and working capital.
After contacting selected shareholders and investors, the Company introduced the investor to
Quercus, the Companys largest shareholder.
The Company was informed on December 30, 2009, by the investor and Quercus that Quercus had agreed
to purchase those shares at $0.80 per share. At that time, the closing market price of a share of
the Companys common stock was approximately $0.65 per share. To facilitate the purchase of the
1,000,000 shares by Quercus, on December 30, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors agreed with
Quercus to reduce the exercise price of 1,560,062 warrants issued to Quercus, in the March 2008
private placement, to $0.01 per share upon the completion of the purchase of all 1,000,000 shares
in 2010. The purchase of the 1,000,000 shares by Quercus was completed on February 20, 2010. The
Company incurred a non-cash charge of $1,421,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 related to
the valuation of the warrants to purchase shares of the Companys common stock acquired by Quercus
in the Companys March 2008 equity financing. On April 28, 2010, Quercus exercised the 2008
warrants. The Companys shareholders approved the reduction in exercise price of the above
mentioned warrants at its Annual Meeting on June 16, 2010.

On December 29, 2009, and in conjunction with the acquisition of SRC, the Company entered into
Letter of Credit Agreements (LOCs) with John Davenport, President of the Company, and with
Quercus, for $250,000 and $300,000, respectively. Please refer to Note 5, Long-Term Borrowings,
for discussion of the terms of these LOCs.

The Vice President of SRC is a minority owner in TLC as well as in Woodstone Energy, LLC
(Woodstone), a Tennessee limited liability company, both of which are located in Nashville,
Tennessee.

SRC renders lighting design and lighting solution services to these related parties within the
scope of their ordinary business activities. Conversely, these related parties, operating as
electrical subcontractors, provide installation support services to SRC as part of their normal
business. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, related party sales totaled $354,000
and $2,533,000. Of these sales, the Company had $766,000 of receivables, including retainage, at
March 31, 2011. Subcontractor installation support services provided by related parties was
$1,584,000 and $3,960,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of
which $2,057,000 was payable at March 31, 2011.

With the acquisition of SRC, the Company entered into an agreement with the seller, TLC, whereby,
SRC would be guaranteed a profit percentage of 25% on certain projects which were begun prior to
the acquisition or were out for bid at the time the acquisition occurred on December 31, 2009.
During 2010, a significant portion of our projects were subject to this guarantee.

In conjunction with the acquisition of SRC on December 31, 2009, the Company entered into an
agreement with TLC whereby a Convertible Promissory Note (Convertible Note) was issued for the
principal amount of $500,000. This Convertible Note bears interest at a rate of the Wall Street
Journal Prime Rate plus two percent (2%), which along with the principal, is due and payable on
June 30, 2013. Additionally, TLC has the right to convert the principal of the Convertible Note,
in whole, into 500,000 shares of the Companys common stock at any time during the period
commencing on June 30, 2010 and ending on the maturity date. Additionally, as a provision to the
Convertible Note, if the reported closing price of a share of the Companys common stock shall not
be equal to or greater than $2.00 for at least twenty (20) trading days between June 30, 2010 and
June 30, 2013, the Company shall pay TLC an additional fee of $500,000 on the maturity date.

On December 31, 2009, the Company issued to Woodstone warrants to purchase up to 600,000 shares of
the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share, and with a term ending on
December 31, 2014. The warrants become exercisable only if SRC receives from Woodstone firm
contracts or purchase orders for at least $10,000,000 by June 30, 2013. The warrants vest in two
tranches: 400,000 shares when contracts or purchase orders between SRC and Woodstone reach
$10,000,000 and an additional 200,000 shares when contracts or purchase orders between SRC and
Woodstone reach an additional $5,000,000. As of March 31, 2011, no warrants related to this
issuance have vested.

The Company, in the agreement for the acquisition of SRC, provided for payment of a management fee
to TLC for overhead expenses in support of up to $20,000,000 in project billings for 2010 on those
projects which TLC provided installation support services. The management fee totaled $1,232,000,
payable in equal monthly installments, and began January 31, 2010 and ended on December 31, 2010.
Furthermore, an additional 8% management fee is payable for project billings above $20,000,000 in
fiscal year 2010 and for fiscal years after December 31, 2010, where TLC provides installation
support services on projects that were pending at the date of acquisition of SRC. For the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2010, the Company did not exceed the $20,000,000 threshold and incurred
only the $1,232,000 of management fees as stipulated in the agreement. For the three months
ending March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred $102,000 and $308,000, respectively, of
expense relating to this management fee.

NOTE 13. LEGAL MATTERS

On January 29, 2010, a competitor and former supplier filed a complaint against the Company in the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, alleging that the Company has misused proprietary trade
secrets, breached a contract, and engaged in deceptive trade practices relating to one of the
Companys lighting products. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and damages. The Company has
answered the complaint and filed a counterclaim for breach of contract. The Company strongly
denies any impropriety, believes that the complaint is without merit, and intends to vigorously
defend itself against this complaint. In the opinion of management, this lawsuit should not have
an adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (financial
statements) and related notes included elsewhere in this report and the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

When used in this discussion, the words expects, anticipates, estimates, plan, and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements, which include
statements as to our expected sales and gross profit margins, expected operating expenses and
capital expenditure levels, our sales and marketing expenses, our general and administrative
expenses, expected expenses related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
adequacy of capital resources and necessity to raise additional funds, our critical accounting
policies, expected restructuring costs related to our consolidation in Solon, Ohio, expected
benefits from our consolidation and statements regarding pending litigation are subject to risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These
risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those risks discussed below, as well as
our ability to manage expenses, our ability to reduce manufacturing overhead and general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of sales, our ability to collect on doubtful accounts
receivable, our ability to increase cash balances in future quarters, the cost of enforcing or
defending intellectual property, unforeseen adverse competitive, economic or other factors that may
impact our cash position, risks associated with raising additional funds, and risks associated with
our pending litigation. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. We
expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to
any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with
regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is
based.

Overview

Energy Focus, Inc. and its subsidiaries engage in the design, development, manufacturing,
marketing, and installation of energy-efficient lighting systems and solutions where we serve two
segments:

product-based sales providing military, general commercial and industrial lighting and
pool lighting offerings, each of which markets and sells energy-efficient lighting systems.

We continue to evolve our business strategy to include providing our customers with turnkey,
comprehensive energy-efficient lighting solutions, which use, but are not limited to, its patented
and proprietary technology. Our product-based solutions include light-emitting diode (LED),
fiber optic, high-intensity discharge (HID), fluorescent tube and other highly energy-efficient
lighting technologies. Typical savings related to our current technology approximates 80% in
electricity costs, while providing full-spectrum light closely simulating daylight colors. Our
strategy also incorporates continued investment into the research of new and emerging energy
sources including, but not limited to, LED and solar energy applications.

Our development of solar technology continues through our role in the United States Governments
Very High Efficiency Solar Cell (VHESC) Consortium sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA). The goal of the VHESC project is to develop a 40% or greater efficient
solar cell for United States military applications, which would also ultimately become available to
the public for commercial application.

Results of Operations

Cash Utilization

Cash and cash equivalents were $1,571,000 at March 31, 2011, a decrease of $2,536,000 from
$4,107,000 at December 31, 2010. Included in cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 is $125,000 and $128,000, respectively, of restricted cash related to funds
received from a grant from/for a branch of United
States government. For the first three months of 2010, cash decreased $402,000, excluding
$1,150,000 of cash received from the selling of a Secured Subordinated Promissory Note.

Solutions-based net sales were $2,602,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to
$5,280,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. This decrease is related to the timing of the
recognition of revenue associated with contracts in our backlog, the size and scope of projects
which were in progress or available for start during the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the
first quarter of 2010. Our solutions-based backlog at March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $3,536,000 and
$4,571,000, respectively. This decrease in our backlog is a result of delays in signed contracts
coming to realization during the first quarter of 2011. Product-based net sales were $2,858,000
for the three months ended March 31, 2011; a decrease of $219,000, compared to $3,077,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in net sales from the first quarter of 2010 was
primarily the result of a decrease in product net sales of our United Kingdom subsidiary and, a
slight decrease in product based sales of our pool and commercial business unit.

Revenues from our products-based business include, but are not limited to, revenues recognized upon
shipping, product sale at completion of installation and installation service at completion of
installation. Revenues from our lighting solutions-based business include, but are not limited to,
revenues recognized from long-term contracts on a percentage-of-completion basis or the fair value
of certain contract deliverables. For a detailed discussion on our revenue recognition policy, see
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Gross profit was $1,159,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $1,395,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2010. The gross profit margin, as a percentage of sales,
increased 4.5% to 21.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to 16.7% for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and is primarily the result of higher profit margins relating to
our product-based net sales and product-based business in the first quarter of 2011 coupled with a
reduction in manufacturing overhead associated with our US product-based business.

Research and Development

Gross research and development expenses were $591,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011,
compared to $340,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.

Research and development expenses include salaries, contractor and consulting fees, supplies and
materials, as well as costs related to other overhead such as depreciation and facilities costs.
Research and development costs are expensed as they are incurred. Our gross research and
development expenses are reduced on a proportional performance basis under DARPA SBIR development
contracts. During 2009 and 2010, SBIR contracts were signed totaling $2,548,000 to be reimbursed
over a two-year recovery period, respectively. Of this total contract amount, $1,592,000 was
billed through March 31, 2011 with the remaining $956,000 categorized as unrecognized reductions of
gross research and development expenses. The amount of credits incurred and accrued from
government contracts were $326,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared to $285,000 for
the same period in 2010. We are currently pursuing additional contracts through various government
agencies, and anticipate being granted additional contracts throughout 2011.

When the government contract is for the delivery of a product or service, we recognize revenues
from those government projects according to proportional performance method or actual deliveries
made. Costs related to the completion of the sale are charged to cost of sales. Revenues
recognized from completed deliveries were $510,000 and $572,000 for the quarters ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively.

Total government reimbursements are the combination of revenues and credits from government
contracts. For the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, our net credits were $836,000 and
$857,000, respectively. Net research and development expense was $265,000 for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011, compared to $55,000 for the same period in 2010.

The gross and net research and development spending along with credits from government contracts is
shown in the following table (in thousands):

Sales and marketing expenses increased 19.5% to $1,935,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2011, as compared to $1,619,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase is
primarily due to an increase in sales incentive costs and costs associated with new product
introduction.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses decreased $101,000 to $1,578,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2011, as compared to $1,679,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease
is primarily due to a reduction in the amortization expense relating to our intangible asset for
customer relationships which is related to the acquisition of Stones River Companies LLC.

Valuation of Equity Instruments

In the first quarter of 2011, we recognized non-cash charges of $56,000 relating to the valuation
of our common stock upon the issuance of 412,000 shares to Lincoln Park Capital Partners, LLC.
During the first quarter of 2010, we recognized a non-cash charge of $1,421,000 related to the
revaluation of warrants to purchase shares of our common stock acquired by The Quercus Trust
(Quercus) in our March 2008 equity financing. Please refer to Note 12, Related Party
Transactions, of our financial statements for a discussion of the transaction with Quercus.

Restructuring Expenses

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we did not incur any restructuring expenses. For the
three months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized restructuring expenses of $26,000. These expenses
are associated with the relocation of our remaining manufacturing equipment and operations in
Solon, Ohio to a warehouse facility located in California.

Other Income and Expenses

We had interest income of $1,000 and interest expense of $183,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2011. Interest income consists of interest earned on deposits. Interest expense includes
interest on our long-term borrowings and contingent consideration, including any amortization of
debt discounts related to these commitments. Please refer to Note 7, Long-Term Borrowings, of our
financial statements for a more detailed discussion of our borrowings. For the three months ended
March 31, 2010, interest income was $2,000 and interest expense was $101,000.

Net loss

We recorded a net loss of $2,813,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to a net
loss of $3,570,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, a 21.2% decrease from the same period
last year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and Cash Equivalents

At March 31, 2011, our cash and cash equivalents were $1,571,000, including restricted cash of
$125,000 relating to funds received from a grant from/for a branch of United States government, as
compared to $4,107,000, including restricted cash of $128,000, at December 31, 2010, a net cash
decrease of $2,536,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. This compares to a net cash
increase of $748,000 for three months ended March 31, 2010, which included $1,150,000 of cash
received from the selling of a Secured Subordinated Promissory Note.

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities primarily consists of our net loss adjusted by non-cash
items, including depreciation, amortization, equity valuations and stock-based compensation, as
well as the effect of changes in
working capital. Net cash used in operating activities was $2,849,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 compared to a net cash usage of $383,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
This usage is primarily the result of the timing of disbursements to subcontractors in support of
our solutions based business, disbursements for government research and development projects and
inventory purchases.

Net cash used in investing activities was $117,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011,
compared to a net cash usage of $16,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. During both
periods, the net cash used was primarily for the acquisition of equipment.

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $413,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
The cash provided was primarily due to the issuance of 412,000 shares of our common stock to
Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (LPC) as described in further detail below. Net cash provided by
financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $1,150,000 which was the result
of us issuing a secured subordinated note payable to EF Energy Partners.

On March 17, 2010, we entered into a Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) with LPC of
Chicago, Illinois and issued to them 120,000 shares of our common stock. Under the Purchase
Agreement, on May 31, 2010, we sold and issued to LPC, and LPC purchased from us, 360,500 shares of
our common stock, together with warrants (Warrants) to purchase 350,000 shares at an exercise
price of $1.20 per share, for a total consideration of $375,000. The Warrants have a term of five
years, are not exercisable until December 1, 2010, and expire on December 1, 2015. Under the
Purchase Agreement, LPC has also agreed to purchase up to an additional 3,650,000 shares of our
common stock at our option over approximately 25 months. As often as every five (5) business days,
we have the right to direct LPC to purchase a calculated number of shares as defined by the terms
of the Purchase Agreement. We can suspend purchases or accelerate the number of shares to be
purchased at any time. No sales of shares may occur below $1.00 per share. The purchase prices of
the shares will be based on the market prices of our shares at the time of sale, as computed under
the Agreement without any fixed discount. We may at any time in our sole discretion terminate the
Agreement without fee, penalty, or cost upon five business dates notice. In connection with the
transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, the Company filed a Registration Statement
(the Registration Statement) with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (the SEC) to
register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the shares of common stock associated with
this transaction. On July 14, 2010, we received a Notice of Effectiveness from the SEC relating to
the Registration Statement. As of December 31, 2010, we sold and issued to LPC, and LPC purchased
from us, a total of 705,550 shares of our common stock for a total consideration of $791,000 which
was offset by expenses of $139,000. In the first quarter of 2011, we sold and issued to LPC, and
LPC purchased from us, a total of 412,000 shares of our common stock for a total consideration of
$407,000. Although we retain the right, in our sole discretion, to terminate the agreement without
fee, penalty, or cost, we reserve the right to continue to utilize this financing activity for
general corporate and working capital purposes and pursuit of our business strategy.

Long-Term Borrowings

On May 27, 2009, we entered into an unsecured promissory note (the Note) with Quercus in the
amount of $70,000. Under the terms of this Note, we are obligated to pay Quercus the principal sum
of the Note and interest accruing at a yearly rate of 1.00% in one lump sum payment on or before
June 1, 2109. We received these funds on June 9, 2009.

On December 29, 2009 and in conjunction with the acquisition of SRC, we entered into Letter of
Credit Agreements (LOCs) with John Davenport, President of Energy Focus, and with Quercus, for
$250,000 and $300,000, respectively. These LOCs have terms of 24 months and bear interest at a
rate of 12.5% on the face amount. The LOCs are collateralized by 15% and 18%, respectively, of
the capital stock of Crescent Lighting Ltd. (CLL), which in turn is based on CLLs net worth as
of November 30, 2009 and are subordinated to the senior indebtedness of Energy Focus and CLL. As
an incentive to enter into the LOCs, we issued five-year, detached warrants to purchase 125,000
and 150,000 shares, respectively, of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. Our
shareholders approved the warrants at the Annual Meeting on June 16, 2010.

In conjunction with the acquisition of Stones River Companies, LLC. (SRC) on December 31, 2009,
we entered into an agreement with TLC Investments, LLC (TLC), whereby a Convertible Promissory
Note (Convertible Note) was issued for the principal amount of $500,000. This Convertible Note
bears interest at the Wall Street
Journal Prime Rate plus two percent (2%), which along with the principal, is due and payable on
June 30, 2013 (maturity date). This Convertible Note is secured by a first-lien-position
security interest in all assets of SRC. Additionally, TLC has the right to convert the principal
of the Convertible Note, in whole, but not in part, into 500,000 shares of our common stock at any
time during the period commencing on June 30, 2010 and through the maturity date. Additionally, as
a provision to the Convertible Note, if the reported closing price of a share of common stock of
the Company is not equal to or greater than $2.00 for at least twenty (20) trading days between
June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2013, we shall pay TLC an additional fee of $500,000 on the maturity
date. We accrued for this potential fee at the time of the agreement.

On March 30, 2010, we entered into an agreement with EF Energy Partners LLC (EF Energy), an Ohio
limited liability company, under which it sold to EF Energy a Secured Subordinated Promissory Note
(Subordinated Note) for the principal amount of $1,150,000. We secured the full amount of this
financing with a pledge of its United States gross accounts receivable and selected capital
equipment. This Subordinated Note bears interest at a rate of 12.5%, which is payable quarterly,
in arrears, commencing September 30, 2010. The entire outstanding principal balance of this
Subordinated Note, together with all accrued interest thereon, is due and payable on March 30,
2013. Additionally, we issued to the eight investors in EF Energy five-year, detached penny
warrants ($.01 per share) to purchase shares of its common stock at a rate of 0.2 warrants per
dollar of financing, or 230,000 warrants, with an expiration date of March 30, 2015. We are not
affiliated with EF Energy Partners.

Through our subsidiary in the United Kingdom, we maintain a British pounds sterling-denominated
bank overdraft facility with Lloyds Bank Plc, in the amount of $402,000, based on the exchange rate
at March 31, 2011. There were no borrowings against this facility as of March 31, 2011 or December
31, 2010. This facility is renewed annually on January 1. The interest rate on the facility was
2.75% at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.

Liquidity

Historically, we have incurred losses attributable to operational performance which have negatively
impacted cash flows. Although management continues to address many of the legacy issues that have
historically burdened our financial performance, we still face challenges in order to reach
profitability. In order for us to attain profitability and growth, we will need to successfully
address these challenges, including the continuation of cost reductions throughout the
organization, execution of its marketing and sales plans for the Companys turnkey energy-efficient
lighting solutions business, the development of new technologies into sustainable product lines and
continued improvements in supply chain performance.

We are optimistic about obtaining the funding necessary to meet on-going tactical and strategic
capital requirements. However, there can be no assurances that this objective will be successful.
As such, we will continue to review and pursue selected external funding sources, if necessary, to
execute these objectives including the following:

loans or other debt instruments may have terms and/or conditions, such as interest rate,
restrictive covenants, and control or revocation provisions, which are not acceptable to
management or the Board of Directors,



the current economic environment combined with the Companys capital constraints may
prevent us from being able to obtain any debt financing,



financing may not be available for parties interested in pursuing the acquisition of one
or more of our operating units, and



additional equity financing may not be available in the current economic environment and
could lead to further dilution of shareholder value for current shareholders of record.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our financial statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingencies, and the
reported amounts of net sales and expenses in the financial statements. Material differences may
result in the amount and timing of net sales and expenses if different judgments or different
estimates were utilized. Critical accounting policies, judgments, and estimates which we believe
have the most significant impact on our financial statements include, but are not limited to, the
establishment of reserves for accounts receivable, sales returns, inventory obsolescence, and
warranty claims; the useful lives for property, equipment, and intangible assets; revenues
recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis; and stock-based compensation. In addition,
estimates and assumptions associated with the determination of
fair value of financial instruments and evaluation of goodwill and long-lived assets for impairment
requires considerable judgment. For the detailed discussion of the application of policies
critical to our business operations, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010.

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued revisions to the accounting
guidance related to troubled debt restructuring. This new guidance is effective for the first
interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively
to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. While we are currently evaluating the effect
this new guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements, we do not believe that it will
have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As of March 31, 2011, we had British pounds sterling-denominated cash valued at $319,000 held in
the United Kingdom, based on the exchange rate at that date. The balances for cash held in the
United Kingdom are subject to exchange rate risk. We have a policy of maintaining cash balances
in local currency unless an amount of cash is occasionally transferred in order to repay
inter-company debts.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Accounting
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing
and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure
controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met.
Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet, and management believes that
they meet, reasonable assurance standards. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and
procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. Any design of
disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Accounting Officer have concluded that,
subject to the limitations noted above, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to
ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was being prepared.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter. Further, there were no other items
identified in connection with our internal evaluations that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

There have been no material changes in the legal proceedings as discussed in Part I, Item 3 of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. However, in the ordinary course
of business, we become involved in other litigation which, in our opinion, will not have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Reference is made to the Risk Factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Annual Report). There have been no significant
changes in those risk factors as set forth in the Annual Report.

Newest 8-K & 10-Q Forms

Site Links

Based on public records. Inadvertent errors are possible. Getfilings.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
This website is not associated with the SEC.