Meanwhile, the embattled Steeler's top player, whose coach is apparently a hardcore Democrat fan of Hillary, stated the following “I promise you one thing, this week we will all be standing out there for the national anthem. Trust me.”

So, should America be grateful that the players are being forced to think again, or will fans become even more angry as events turn slowly towards a clear Trump victory for the nation?

Unfortunately, many of us suspect that irreversible damage has already been done to the league, to such an extent that the NFL will be unable to reverse the mounting losses , at least not anytime soon.

Respect for both the game and its formerly renowned players seems to have gone the way of the Dodo bird, at least for the forseeable future.

In fact, not only did the left-leaning league spit on the nation's flag & its people, the players, appearing much as basic primates, even decided to fling excrement at America's elected leader Donald Trump, which has only infuriated fans, even further.

But, the sudden effect of fans reacting with closed wallets, seems the thing that now has a great many teams rethinking effete NFL Commissioner Goodell's, cowardly if not completely imbecilic reaction.

Goodell's worrying over his anti-American players, even as they trashed America in their anthem-kneel on Sunday while then standing in salute to the Queen of England during its National Anthem, seems totally oblivious to the fans that support the game.

Sorry, but that's just significantly stupid, no matter how you slice it.

Looks like the graffiti's on the wall, for the "NFL Lives Matter" club, in its "Custer's Last Stand" re-enactment.

Perhaps the saddest thing might be the fact that the teams who aren't participating in the NFL's social justice redistribution game are being smeared with the same unpatriotic brush.

Jerry Richardson, owner, Carolina Panthers

"Panthers players are frustrated by restrictions put in place by owner Jerry Richardson that could put them at risk of some form of punishment if they were to publicly address social issues," according to The Charlotte Observer.

“Politicizing the game is damaging and takes the focus off the greatness of the game itself and those who played it,” Richardson said in a statement on Monday.

Richardson, a very strong leader, is setting the example that too many other cowardly owners have failed to follow, and they'll pay, of course.

Meanwhile, the Green Bay Packers, a team owned by its fans, insulted them even further when the team asked fans to join them in a show of disloyal unity, on Thursday night's game, which amounts to a clueless twisting of the knife, in the goose that laid the golden egg.

Maybe the DOJ should be investigating the NFL, instead of Trump, for collusion with the enemy, right?

Says USA Today,"A request by Green Bay Packers players for fans to join them in a show of unity during the national anthem before their game Thursday apparently did little to calm the debate."Packers fans on Wednesday continued to blast the NFL, the team and players for what they perceive as showing disrespect for the nation, the flag, the military or the national anthem by sitting, kneeling, remaining in the locker room or locking arms during the national anthem. Supporters say players are peacefully exercising their free speech rights on the best stage available. "

However, fans say screw you!

According to Bloomberg ,"Over the weekend, fans who agree with Trump shared lists of advertisers on social media networks while calling for boycotts along with hashtags like #PunchThemInTheWallet. Meanwhile "Trump is keeping his eye on the NFL. On Tuesday morning, he was back on Twitter. “Ratings for NFL football are way down,” he wrote, “except before game starts, when people tune in to see whether or not our country will be disrespected!”

You got to hand it to the Trumpster, who might, in fact, be the only man in history to singlehandedly bully all 1,696 football players of the NFL into total and complete submission, or else. You just gotta love it, oh, and......

Wall Street might be shocked to learn it is helping bankroll the anti-Trump “resistance” movement that’s aggressively fighting policies it favors — including corporate tax cuts and the repeal of Obama-era banking and health-care regulations.

The Obama administration’s massive shakedown of Big Banks over the mortgage crisis included unprecedented back-door funding for dozens of Democratic activist groups who were not even victims of the crisis.

At least three liberal nonprofit organizations the Justice Department approved to receive funds from multibillion-dollar mortgage settlements were instrumental in killing the ObamaCare repeal bill and are now lobbying against GOP tax reform, as well as efforts to rein in illegal immigration.

An estimated $640 million has been diverted into what critics say is an improper, if not unconstitutional, “slush fund” fed from government settlements with JPMorgan Chase and Co., Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp., according to congressional sources.

The payola is potentially earmarked for third-party interest groups approved by the Justice Department and HUD without requiring any proof of how the funds will be spent. Many of the recipients so far are radical leftist organizations who solicited the settlement cash from the administration even though they were not parties to the lawsuits, records show.

“During the Obama administration, groups committed to ‘revolutionary social change’ sent proposals and met with high-level HUD and Justice Department officials to try to get their pieces of the settlement pie,” Cause of Action Institute vice president Julie Smith told The Post.

Some of the chosen beneficiaries are now actively militating against the Trump administration and its policies, including:

The first thing to remember is the fact that there is no measurable difference between ISIS and Al Qaeda, in that ISIS was renamed from the former group known as "Al Qaeda in Iraq."

Both are heavily associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.....

CRN Politics

By Barry Secrest

It reads almost as a roadmap of recent world history and yet it's well beyond difficult to fathom who seems to be following the architecture more closely; Obama and the globalists or Al Qaeda?

While researching a current article dealing with the timeline of events leading up to a worldwide assault on the West by Islam, one unassuming link led to a discovery that seems to have become lost in the modern day.

The plan reads as "Al Qaeda's seven-step strategy to 2020" and so far it's remarkably accurate. The plan reportedly came directly from none other than Osama Bin Laden and was established even before the 9/11 attacks.

The question, as both the Bush and Obama regimes, have, remarkably, stumbled right through the preordained steps, becomes who gave the plans to Bin laden?

Published by Abdel Bari Atwan, in 1996, and mostly forgotten, a read through of the stages of conflict from the late Bin Laden himself, leaves one with a well-defined series of goosebumps.

Remarkably, this bit of chilling knowledge is not at all well known in the west and contains few references within the western world, at present:

Obama Bin Laden's 1996 plans to establish a super-caliphate leading to Armageddon

Stage 1 - Provoke the US into attacking the Mideast where the Islamists can fight the infidels more readily

Stage 2- The Muslim Umma awake from their slumber, arm themselves, and begin a jihad against all of the foreign invaders

Stage 3- The conflict expands throughout all the region. A triangle of Jihad Terror is formed between Iraq, Syria, and Jordan.

Stage 4- Al Qaeda becomes a global network transcending national boundaries as a new set of ideological precepts is formed.

Stage 6- An overthrow of Arab dictators is completed and an Islamic super-caliphate is formed encompassing the entire region.

Stage 7- A clash of Civilizations ensues forcing a mighty apocalyptic battle between the Crusaders (Christians of the West) and the Islamists which is eventually won by Islam, at least according to Islamic prophecy, allowing a global caliphate to be established.

The Book of Revelation, in the Christian Bible, seems to allude to the same step of events , however, the Bible indicates that the battle will be won by forces as led by Christ, ushering in a bold new era.