They definitely have a lot of good young pieces on defense, but they still play IN Cleveland. I think the Weeden pick was an unbelievably awful move, but at this point I could go either way, stick it out and see how it goes one more year or have the balls to just move on. Cleveland also has a decent OL building, some young WRs with upside, and big bad TRich.

The deal was 5 for $34m, though, so that was probably more than Seattle would've/could've spent, and that Bryant was chasing the highest bidder.

pinksheets wrote:I'd wish bad things upon him, but he's going to Cleveland, so it'd just be overkill.

Cleveland's defense is very good. I wish they'd stick with Weeden, and get some good O-line and WR pieces for him.

Cleveland's D was good. Next year is to be seen, the secondary is decent for sure.The new owner wants to copy the 3-4 in Pitty to the T, and he is willing to switch a pretty good 4-3 to a 3-4 to do it. I have to assume Bryant is going to be a DE in the 3-4, and while I think he can play the 5 tech, it isn't what he did in Cleveland.