Shuttle Challenger in 1986 versus shuttle Columbia in 2003: Typology of Illuminati TheatreDisaster of the (model of) Shuttle Challenger in 1986 and "disaster" of the "shuttle Columbia" in 2003 are two examples related to the fraud of the" International Space Station " ISS (1), illustrating the same category of theater, from the point of view of frequency and duration: both had a special representation only. (2)

Interestingly from the perspective of the classification depending on whether the first act is staged or not, shuttle Challenger in 1986 and shuttle Columbia in 2003 do not belong to the same base category:- NASA had to stage the "death" of "astronauts" in 1986, due to a real first act, the explosion of the rocket after being launched. The goal of staging the "death of astronauts" act is obviously to cover up the fraud. Reminder: the "Space Shuttle" visible on launch attached to the rocket is only a model, with no "astronaut." In fact the interior is completely empty.- In the case of Columbia in 2003 it was staged by NASA from the beginning, the goal of of the screenplay was to sell the credibility of the fraud, by adding hazards to the hoax. Reminder: the Space Shuttle is only packaged as a special airplane, the public can not attend the landings because it is necessary to cover-up the noise of the jets.

Shuttle Challenger in 1986 versus shuttle Columbia in 2003: Typology of Illuminati TheatreDisaster of the (model of) Shuttle Challenger in 1986 and "disaster" of the "shuttle Columbia" in 2003 are two examples related to the fraud of the" International Space Station " ISS (1),

Reminder: the "Space Shuttle" visible on launch attached to the rocket is only a model, with no "astronaut." In fact the interior is completely empty.

Prove it. I've seen photos of the shuttle on orbit taken by amateurs where you can see the cargo within the "empty" payload bay: [link to www.sas.org]

Reminder: the Space Shuttle is only packaged as a special airplane, the public can not attend the landings because it is necessary to cover-up the noise of the jets.

This is my favorite part of the whole post. I've been to the landings, I've seen and heard them come in. My own grandmother's house just happens to be perfectly situated to view approaches to runway 15 - you can't keep the public from seeing it for miles around. The only noise is the sonic boom and the sound of the air being disturbed, there's no "jet engine noise" at all and none of the shuttle's engines can be seen to do anything.

I don't know about them being "fake" but I've always been suspect of the Space Shuttle program. Almost 30 years of drifting in orbit doing "experiments"? WTF were they experimenting with? How rat shit reacts to zero gravity? Who gives a shit about that? How many mundane, useless experiments can you do? All the video we've ever been fed was nothing more that bullshit, like drinking water out of the air, floating around the shuttle and eating dinner.

Think about it...

As many trips as they took and we have been fed a mere breadcrumb of bullshit, non-sense. Either this was a humongous waste of money or they were doing more than they are telling us.

I've watched the isis or iss fly by over my house several times. As far as experiments, my stepdad is an aerospace engineer for a contractor of nasa and military. He tells me a little bit about the experiments he produces to go up on iss and shuttles. He receives data back and makes new projects based off of the results. A few things I remember are testing gases in different pressures, different mechanisms for machines that fit into very small spaces...he also thinks I'm crazy for thinking there are chemtrails. I think he should know better!

Shuttle Challenger in 1986 versus shuttle Columbia in 2003: Typology of Illuminati TheatreDisaster of the (model of) Shuttle Challenger in 1986 and "disaster" of the "shuttle Columbia" in 2003 are two examples related to the fraud of the" International Space Station " ISS (1), illustrating the same category of theater, from the point of view of frequency and duration: both had a special representation only. (2)

Interestingly from the perspective of the classification depending on whether the first act is staged or not, shuttle Challenger in 1986 and shuttle Columbia in 2003 do not belong to the same base category:- NASA had to stage the "death" of "astronauts" in 1986, due to a real first act, the explosion of the rocket after being launched. The goal of staging the "death of astronauts" act is obviously to cover up the fraud. Reminder: the "Space Shuttle" visible on launch attached to the rocket is only a model, with no "astronaut." In fact the interior is completely empty.- In the case of Columbia in 2003 it was staged by NASA from the beginning, the goal of of the screenplay was to sell the credibility of the fraud, by adding hazards to the hoax. Reminder: the Space Shuttle is only packaged as a special airplane, the public can not attend the landings because it is necessary to cover-up the noise of the jets.

Notes(1) Angel Vladimir Putin, sent by God, and end the fraud of the ISS in the words of the Prophet of the End of the Era:

(2) More examples of using the ISS hoax to illustrate categories of theater in terms of frequency and duration: