On Monday, May 23, 2005, FOX affiliate WSVN-TV sent Patrick Fraser, with only a BS in Journalism from UF-Gainsville, to tangle with Scientist Dr. A.K. Dewdney over the 9/11 Pentagon quagmire. Dr. Dewdney: "If we are right the implications are profound."Reporter: "Right or right off the wacko chart, common sense tells you its not likely. In fact common sense tells you its not only outrageous -- its ridiculous and one well known skeptic has another description for it -- laughable." INDEED, ´laughable´ describes most of this article. [link to www.wsvn.com]

As the pioneer 9/11 researcher Kee Dewdney struck gold when he proved beyond a shadow of doubt that cellphones from airliners were a fable of the Bush Administration on 9/11. That was the first foot in the doorway to 9/11 Truth. [link to physics911.ca]

As most Americans are unfamilar with using the Scientific Method in solving problems, everyone should pay attention when Kee Dewdney demonstates the use of the Scientific Method in explaining 9/11. BY THE WAY, the Scientific Method completely funks the Fed Govt. 9/11 conspiracy theory. [link to www.serendipity.li]

As an affiliate of FOX network, WSVN-TV should focus on the Hollywood-style Towering Inferos or lack thereof on 9/11. In the RENSE article, Sneak Preview - 911 Pentagon Tapes [link to www.rense.com]

Firefighter Russell Dodge said. "There were two vehicles burning, along with a construction trailer - we didn´t know at the time, but that trailer was the main producer of smoke on the outside of the building. He said the foam units got there and concentrated on the area of the construction trailer, which was producing some severe fires and subsequent mini explosions due to highly flammable chemicals in it THAN on the actual point of impact from the hijacked aircraft. [link to www.mdw.army.mil]

The ´construction trailer´, actually a large generator trailer with its own 500 diesel oil tank, was not used but kept for an emergency. As there was no need for the large extra tank nearby, the tank apparently was filled with a crude oil-diesel oil mixture, similar to an orchard smudge pot, and remotely ignited to create the enormous smoke plume . Note that the smoke from the burning trailer is whitish.

Witnesses said the aircraft hardly penetrated the brick Pentagon wall before an explosion blew it to bits. Apparently that explosion is caught here. See the RENSE article, Sneak Preview - 911 Pentagon Tapes [link to www.rense.com]

Note that the circled area around the generator trailer was also ignited.

This photo JUST AFTER the Explosion shows a bonfire in front of the impact area with its smoke plume and the Generator trailer area highlighted with its smoke plume just getting a start. Of course, NO Pentagon section down.

This photo shows the generator trailer area producing an enormous smoke plume with the bonfire in front of the impact area about the same as the last photo but a better show for the camera shots sent around the world.

Witnesses said they thought explosive charges were set off inside the Pentagon ´impact area´ to make it appear that the aircraft actually passed the front wall when it really didn´t. That would explain large fire development even outside the impact area.

Here the firetruck is directing foam at the large fuel tank only with a minor fire still burning on the generator trailer.

Shortly after 9/11, a panel of Boston area-based civil and structural engineers convened at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The main culprits in bringing the famously lofty buildings down, they concluded, were the two intensely hot infernos that erupted when tens of thousands of gallons of aviation fuel spilled from the doomed airliners.

IN A RARE EPISODE of 9/11 Truth reporting, the NY Times plied loose a tape from the DOJ, FBI Video & Tape Collection claimed held for ´national security´ but seemingly held to protect the criminals behind 9/11.

"Battalion Seven ... Ladder 15, we´ve got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that, [link to www.thememoryhole.org]

IN MORE 9/11 Truth REPORTING Reporter Tom Flucco interviewed Presidential candidate Karl Schwarz who said "there are about 150 retired and active U.S. military and federal intelligence officers who will come forward and testify regarding government involvement in the September 11 attacks--but only if there is a serious criminal grand jury."

Apparently NY AG Spitzer and NYC DA Morgenthau are involved in Obstruction of 9/11 Justice. We have heard reports indicating that the New York federal grand jury in Albany is so displeased with Spitzer and Morgenthau´s paucity of action and lack of subpoenas or indictments over 9/11 (given the evidence already handed over) that it has assumed its own independent constitutional and federal authority to take control of the criminal proceedings.

No matter how high the federal officials or elected representatives implicated, or which print and electronic media executives committed obstruction of justice to cover up criminal evidence, or which military and government officials supervised the two-hour Air Force stand-down during the attacks, New Yorkers who elected Spitzer and Morgenthau (and all Americans who trust them with their personal safety and protection in their jurisdiction over 9-11 criminal proceedings) have a right to expect the two to proceed full bore with obvious, credible, and prosecutable evidence that the U.S. government played a part in the September 11 attacks. This includes the above Pentagon-related evidence.

The North Tower Smoking Infero didn´t originate at the crash area. A victim is circled in the first photo..

This photo shows a SINGLE North Tower floor resembling a smudge pot putting out vast clouds of black, sooty smoke just like at the Pentagon . Certainly a steel structure with 4 inch concrete floors would normally have little combustible material.

AS only 17 minutes expired between crashes AND a black smoke plume was required to hide the helicopter operating above the South Tower before, during, and after the South Tower crash, this floor probably contained barrels of crude oil-diesel fuel mixture that was remotely ignited TO ENSURE A HIDING PLACE FOR THE HELICOPTER. Didn´t work as cameras galore caught it in action.

See the RENSE article On 9/11 An Ill Wind Blew to Booker School for the full story about the need for a smoke plume that also implicates criminals in and out of federal government for 9/11.

In 1945, a USAF two-engine B-25 bomber crashed into the 79th floor of the 102-storey Empire State Building in Manhattan. The crash occurred during a misty night, and the damage was restricted to the impact area. When the plane crashed, one of its engines whizzed from the north wall, and through the south wall, ultimately landing on the roof of a nearby building. Debris from the building and plane also severed through elevator cables, and sent two cars and passengers into freefall. "We were horrified to see a B-25 half in and half out of the Empire State Building."

snip>IN MORE 9/11 Truth REPORTING Reporter Tom Flucco interviewed Presidential candidate Karl Schwarz who said "there are about 150 retired and active U.S. military and federal intelligence officers who will come forward and testify regarding government involvement in the September 11 attacks--but only if there is a serious criminal grand jury."

Seems to me that the 150 retired military are already witnesses to the secrecy behind 911. I think they should consider that the whole world is a "grand jury". There will never be an "official" court of honest inquiry regarding this case whereby the perps could be brought to justice.

OP do you even question the sources you use? What I mean is do you objectively investigate the claims of these sites you quote at all, more less at least as much as you question the the 911 commission´s findings?

You, like any ideologue on either side of this issue, are blinded by your predisposed opinion. I wouldn´t trust YOU or most of the Internet sites you quote (Rense, for God´s sake??)for an objective review of the facts any more than you trust the 911 commission.

Yea, sure we can have an objective investigation. But if it is run by YOU why bother? Are YOU any more objective than the worst redneck jingoist? I think not LOL!

Nor would I care to have knee-jerk ideologues like you running my barber shop after ´the revolution´, more less my nation.

So, you keep taking the writings of people whom you have no idea if they even know what they are talking about as the gospel truth, continue to be a blind ideological sheep, and let the truly objective people separate the wheat from the chaff concerning the 911 commission.

DogFishHead, why does the government continue to suppress the videos known to exist of a plane, or whatever, hitting the Pentagon? The footage we have sworn statements of witnesses that was confiscated by the FBI minutes after the attack? We already know what it shows, right, and it can´t possible be anywhere nearly as gory and upsetting as the Trade Center footage that was run incessantly, can it? Why only 4 blurry and obviously tampered images that are basically no more than cartoons? (Two of those doctored images bear the exact same time-stamp.)

Why?

What´s the point?

If someone isn´t trying to hide something, what possibly is the point?