First, this thread isn't meant to be divisive or derogatory to the Armenians. I am just stating what I percieve to be a problem that Armenians encounter in societies. It seems to be important to Armenians to be an inclusive group that tends toward group unity while living in societies other than their own. I can understand why that is the case since if the armenians were not inclusive and somewhat clanish(not meant as a negative) they would long ago have become assimilated into other cultures and the results would be that today there would not be Armenians or an Armenia. The problem is that a dominant culture would tend to look upon that inclusiveness in a negative way. Is that how the Turks viewed the Armenians? Along the same line I understand that Hitler at first looked upon the Armenians as an outside group but changed his mind when certain facts were presented to him. There is no doubt in my mind that Armenians are connected to western civilization racially(and religiously). But I don't know if I would call the Armenians an offshoot of western culture. Anyway, the Armenians are certainly closer to western white nationalists than the countries that surround Armenia in the Caucases. These are just some of the thoughts roaming around in my head as I try to determine who and what is important to white nationalists.

First, this thread isn't meant to be divisive or derogatory to the Armenians. I am just stating what I percieve to be a problem that Armenians encounter in societies. It seems to be important to Armenians to be an inclusive group that tends toward group unity while living in societies other than their own. I can understand why that is the case since if the armenians were not inclusive and somewhat clanish(not meant as a negative) they would long ago have become assimilated into other cultures and the results would be that today there would not be Armenians or an Armenia.

Well, if you were living in a sea of blacks, a sea of hispanics, a sea of jews, wouldn't you want to keep decidedly separate from them? Isn't the whole idea to preserve your own kind?

Quote:

The problem is that a dominant culture would tend to look upon that inclusiveness in a negative way. Is that how the Turks viewed the Armenians?

Yea, if they were ignorant, brainwashed multiculturalists. But I would not expect such a reaction from a WN. As far as the turks go, I don't believe that such a thought ever crossed their feeble minds until their filthy jewish cousins planted the seeds of jealousy and suspicion in them.

Quote:

Along the same line I understand that Hitler at first looked upon the Armenians as an outside group but changed his mind when certain facts were presented to him.

Specifically, it was proven to him that Armenians are Aryans.

Quote:

There is no doubt in my mind that Armenians are connected to western civilization racially(and religiously). But I don't know if I would call the Armenians an offshoot of western culture.

Armenia was a once great nation. It served as a bastion of Christianity for centuries. Their history is Western-oriented. However, Armenia is not geographically in Europe. Armenian script doesn't use European (Romanized or Cyrrillic) symbols, it looks Arabic in origin. My second observation is that not all Armenians are of old Armenian stock. Many are visibly mixed. Lastly, while I know that many Armenian nationalists are about being wholly Armenian in every way, many Armenians don't. A large number tend to associate with other Middle Easterners, except for Turks because Turks are filthy and should be eliminated. These Armenians, from what I have seen first hand, make up a disturbingly large portion of the population. Somewhat akin to wiggers. Except wiggers don;t make up large portions of European nations.

I'd accept classical Armenians without any problems, but as it stands now, the country needs a massive to purge itself of non-White Armenians and those who don't act like true Armenians.

The look is Arabic, or vice versa. As far as I know Farsi is written left to right too. Doesn't make it European.

Not really, Armenian is way different than Arabic or vice versa! Think i can differentiate that pretty well since I've been learning Arabic since i was something like 5 years old . Well on ther other hand, the swastika was used at some point to make up the Armenian alphabet ( some letters ) . I don't think arabs used the swastika as well...or did they?

That looks oddly non-European to me. It isn't symbollic like runes. It isn't Romanized. It isn't Cyrillic either.

The Greek Alphabet uses modern Greco-Roman letters. It has more in common with European alphabets is is distinctly European. that isn't the case with Armenian. It doesn't look like full blown Arabic, it might not read like it, but there is a strange resemblance.

Me too. I've known a number Armenians, and while they're probably about the darkest people I'd consider to be white, they embodied everything a good aryan should be....they were smart, hardworking, loyal, family oriented and even racially proud. The ones I've known were Armenian-Americans and they were fully assimalated to western culture....unlike the muds.