Al-CIA-duh

This blog will collect articles that pertain to the idea that Al Qaeda (or Al-Qaida, Al Qeida, Al Q'aida), henceforth known here as Al-CIA-duh, is an essentially bogus organization created by the US CIA and other intelligence agencies.

A statement from Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula,
posted on Twitter, said that Mr. Rubeish was killed Monday in what it
called a “hate-filled Crusader strike” near Al Mukalla, a city on
Yemen’s southern coast.

Since
2009, Mr. Rubeish has been the group’s voice in many important
pronouncements, including a video eulogy for Anwar al-Awlaki, the
American cleric killed in a drone strike in 2011.

(snip)

For
several years, American counterterrorism officials have seen Al Qaeda
in the Arabian Peninsula as the terrorist group posing the greatest
threat to the United States. It was responsible for two failed plots to
blow up United States-bound airliners: one in 2009 that used explosives
hidden in a bomber’s underwear, and a foiled attack in 2010 using bombs
hidden in printer cartridges addressed to Chicago and sent aboard cargo
planes.

The
life and death of Mr. Rubeish reflected several stages in the struggle
of the United States to deal with terrorist suspects since 2001,
including his imprisonment at Guantánamo and his participation in a
Saudi rehabilitation program for militants, which evidently failed.

According to a biography
prepared by officials at Guantánamo, Mr. Rubeish was born into a
wealthy Saudi family and earned a certificate in Islamic law. He wanted
to join the fight against Russian forces in Chechnya, but after
traveling to Pakistan for training he was directed to a Qaeda training
camp in Afghanistan in May 2001, when he was about 22.

After
the Sept. 11 attacks, he fought at Tora Bora in Afghanistan and was
captured by Pakistani forces and turned over to the United States,
arriving at Guantánamo in January 2002. A 2005 assessment judged that he
was a member of Al Qaeda who posed a “medium” risk and said that he had
“some type of leadership role among detainees and strongly influences
them.” He contributed an “Ode to the Sea” to a collection of poems by Guantánamo prisoners published in 2007.

Earlier in 2005, Mr. Rubeish was among several Guantánamo detainees to challenge their detention with a habeas corpus
petition in federal court in Washington. The petition was denied, but
in December 2006, the George W. Bush administration sent Mr. Rubeish
home to Saudi Arabia on the condition that he enter the rehabilitation
program.

That
program generally has a good reputation among counterterrorism experts,
but among its most prominent failures were militants who helped form Al
Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula in 2009.

The former deputy leader of
that Qaeda branch, Saeed al-Shihri, followed the same path from
Guantánamo to the Saudi rehab program and then to Yemen, where he died
in a drone strike in 2013.

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Cash for Qlunkers

C.I.A. Cash Ended Up in Coffers of Al Qaeda

Imagine that! Shocker! I'm sure it was totally unintended!

WASHINGTON — In the spring of 2010, Afghan officials struck a deal to free an Afghan diplomat held hostage by Al Qaeda. But the price was steep — $5 million — and senior security officials were scrambling to come up with the money.
They first turned to a secret fund that the Central Intelligence Agency bankrolled with monthly cash deliveries to the presidential palace in Kabul, according to several Afghan officials involved in the episode.

The Afghan government, they said, had already squirreled away about $1 million from that fund.
Within weeks, that money and $4 million more provided from other countries was handed over to Al Qaeda, replenishing its coffers after a relentless C.I.A. campaign of drone strikes in Pakistan had decimated the militant network’s upper ranks.

“God blessed us with a good amount of money this month,” Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, the group’s general manager, wrote in a letter to Osama bin Laden in June 2010, noting that the cash would be used for weapons and other operational needs.
Abdul Khaliq Farahi, who was kidnapped by Al Qaeda in 2008.

Bin Laden urged caution, fearing the Americans knew about the payment and had laced the cash with radiation or poison, or were tracking it. “There is a possibility — not a very strong one — that the Americans are aware of the money delivery,” he wrote back, “and that they accepted the arrangement of the payment on the basis that the money will be moving under air surveillance.”

The C.I.A.’s contribution to Qaeda’s bottom line, though, was no well-laid trap. It was just another in a long list of examples of how the United States, largely because of poor oversight and loose financial controls, has sometimes inadvertently financed the very militants it is fighting.

Uh huh, shuurrre.

And how charming is this fake bin Laden anyway? He sure played his role well.

Saturday, November 03, 2012

Benghazi

Overall, the CIA’s depiction of the events that led to the death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens
offers new insight into US operations in the eastern Libyan city. It
suggests that the small and lightly secured diplomatic mission served as
a kind of cover for a larger but covert US intelligence presence,
centered in an “annex” located about a mile from the consulate. This
intelligence-gathering was focused on an area where Islamist extremists
and Al Qaeda-affiliated militants were known to operate.

Well, this brings the attack on the compound that killed 4 new Americans, including the Libyan ambassador, into a whole new light, and explains some of the reasons for the shifting storyline.

I can think of several possible explanations for the attack now:

1) classic revenge-type anger blowback by the militants on to the CIA, if the CIA was trying to control the militants

2) an attack by the militants on the CIA faction as part of a cover-up by the CIA. Possibly the Ambassador was being tipped off on al-CIA-duh activities by the CIA contractors who were killed.

3) a deliberately instigated attack by militants at the behest of the CIA, to create some sort of October-surprise incident to influence the presidential election

Abu Zabaydah

Now that the US government has admitted that it has no case against
Abu Zubaydah and that he was never associated with al Qaeda, will they
release him? As attorney Mickum requested, will his client be allowed
to tell his own story? More importantly, will the official accounts of
9/11 be reviewed to extricate claims allegedly made by and about Zubayda
so that those false claims do not to provide additional false direction
in War on Terror?

No, almost certainly not.

As with the court order to classify “any statements made by the
accused” in the trials of KSM and other suspects,[51] if this man is
allowed to speak we may find that his mind has not been completely
obliterated through the torture we inflicted upon him. And we may find
that the official myth of 9/11 and al Qaeda will not hold up against the
open and un-tortured testimony of the people alleged to have committed
the crimes of 9/11. In the end, it seems that the Zubaydah case is a
threat to al Qaeda itself as well as a public admission that some lies
must be kept under wraps in order to maintain the overall deception that
supports the War on Terror.

Tuesday, May 08, 2012

Al-CIA-duh Watch-- New Underwear Bomb Plot

An insider, working with the United States and an allied security service, thwarted the al-Qaida bomb plot hatched in Yemen and provided information that allowed the U.S. to launch a Predator drone strike that killed the group’s operations chief, senior U.S. officials tell NBC News.
"It was managed so that it was not a threat," said one senior Obama administration official, who like the others spoke on condition of anonymity. “We were confident that we had inside control over any plot that might have been associated with this device.
“The device never got near an airplane. To our knowledge, it never got near an airplane or airport.”
The bomb -- a refined version of an “underwear bomb” used in two previous failed terror plots -- was driven out of Yemen by the insider into Saudi Arabia. It is now in the hands of U.S. bomb experts at the FBI labs in Quantico, Va., where experts have been examining it for a week, the officials said. The infiltrator also is safely out of Yemen.

I guess the CIA wants to get in on the FBI's action of breaking up terror plots that it itself creates.

Saturday, February 18, 2012

FBI Breaks Up Latest Terrorist Plot That It Created...

A 29-year-old Moroccan man who believed he was working with al-Qaida was arrested Friday near the U.S. Capitol as he was planning to detonate what he thought was a suicide vest that undercover operatives gave him, officials said. Amine El Khalifi of Alexandria, Va., was taken into custody with a gun that didn't work and inert explosives, according to a counterterrorism official. He arrived near the Capitol in a van with the two undercover operatives, and walked toward the building, according to court papers. He was arrested before he left the parking garage. El Khalifi made a brief appearance on Friday afternoon in federal court in Alexandria, where a judge set a bail hearing for Wednesday. After his arrest, FBI agents raided a red brick rambler home in Arlington, Va. A police car blocked the entrance.

A criminal complaint charges him with knowingly and unlawfully attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction against property that is owned and used by the United States. The charge carries a maximum penalty of life in prison.

El Khalifi, who was under constant surveillance, expressed interest in killing at least 30 people and considered targeting a building in Alexandria and a restaurant, synagogue and a place where military personnel gather in Washington before he settled on the Capitol after canvassing that area a couple of times, the counterterrorism official said. During the investigation, El Khalifi went with undercover operatives in January to a quarry in West Virginia to practice detonating explosives, according to court documents. He believed he was working with an al-Qaida operative on the plot, according to an affidavit.

About Me

The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations.