Plans To Merge Programs Rapped

WASHINGTON--While some members of a key House spending panel nodded
their heads last week in approval of President Reagan's overall
education budget proposal for fiscal 1989, they expressed displeasure
with plans to reduce or eliminate funds for some categorical
programs.

"It has taken about 10 years of kicking and screaming to drag you
into the 20th century,'' Representative William Natcher, Democrat of
Kentucky, told Bruce M. Carnes, deputy undersecretary for planning,
budget, and evaluation, during a hearing last week. "Now, you are on
the right road.''

Mr. Natcher chairs the House Appropriations subcommittee on labor,
health and human services, and education, which heard testimony on the
department's proposals for special and vocational education, student
aid, and departmental management.

The Administration has recommended a total of $21.2 billion in
education spending, up substantially from last year's request of about
$14 billion.

While Mr. Natcher expressed approval of the overall budget figure,
he said he was concerned that certain programs would be zeroed out in
order to achieve that level.

Department officials argued that in most cases, programs would not
be eliminated, but rather merged into other categories. For example,
Madeleine C. Will, assistant secretary for special education and
rehabilitative services, told the panel that the department would
submit legislation that would combine projects for the deaf and blind
with those for the severely handicapped.

But Representative Joseph D. Early, Democrat of Massachusetts,
responded that in his home state "I haven't come across anyone who
thinks it is a good idea.''

In a similar vein, the department has proposed the consolidation of
three vocational-education "set asides''--consumer and homemaking
education, aid to community-based organizations, and bilingual
vocational training--into the main program's basic state grant.

The funding level for the basic grant, however, would be increased
by $44 million over this year's level; the 1988 appropriation for the
three programs, in comparison, was $82.8 million.

Bonnie Guiton, assistant secretary for vocational and adult
education, said the proposal represents an attempt to give states more
flexibility in the use of federal vocational-education funds.

Representative Silvio O. Conte, Republican of Massachusetts, asked
Ms. Guiton if the department could assure that the programs would
continue if merged into the basic grant.

Ms. Guiton said she could not, but added: "Anything worth being
stands on its own bottom.''

Mr. Conte replied: "I know the programs can stand on their own
bottom, but I want to give them a pair of legs.''--RRW

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.