You are here

Same-sex kisses have arrived in media

Same-sex kisses have arrived in media

Ashley Williams, left, and Lindsay Vandermay received their marriage certificate at the marriage bureau office in City Hall on Tuesday, May 20, 2014, in Philadelphia. (Yong Kim/Philadelphia Daily News/MCT)

By ANYA SOSTEKPittsburgh Post-Gazette

Sometimes, a kiss is just a kiss.

And sometimes, it’s a sign of swift and sweeping cultural and political change.

Over the past days, weeks, and perhaps not even years, same-sex kisses have started to arrive in mainstream news media.

“We’re now seeing this stuff completely across the board,” said Bob Thompson, director of the Bleier Center for Television &Popular Culture at Syracuse University. “This has been evolving for a long time.”

Just five years ago, CBS’s “The Early Show” blurred a kiss from Adam Lambert and his boyfriend during a musical performance on the “American Music Awards,” deeming it “a subject of great current controversy.”

The year before, Katy Perry titillated much of the country by merely singing that she kissed a girl — and she liked it.

How times have changed.

Last week, following the opening of the Allegheny County Marriage License Bureau to same-sex couples, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette website featured a photo of two women kissing.

That same night ABC aired a gay wedding of characters Mitchell and Cam on its hit show “Modern Family,” sealed with a kiss afterwards.

And earlier this month, ESPN showed Michael Sam giving his boyfriend a celebratory kiss after he became the first openly gay football player to be drafted. The sports network actually aired its first gay kiss — a celebratory smooch between a gay professional bowler and his husband — last year.

To some extent, same-sex kisses have been prevalent in the media for some time.

There were same-sex couples on shows as far back as “Dynasty” and “Thirtysomething,” said Thompson, with a then-controversial same-sex kiss on a 1994 episode of “Roseanne.”

For a period of time in the 1990s, he said, same-sex kisses appeared with some regularity on network television, becoming almost trendy. “The same-sex kiss became one of those things that gave credibility to a show — that is was serious, cutting edge,” he said, referring to television programs such as “Ally McBeal” and “Dawson’s Creek.”

Still, there has been a much more recent change in media showing same-sex kisses from real people, rather than fictional ones.

In some cases, those pictures have still been accompanied by controversy.

Both the Denver Post and the Fayetteville Observer newspapers ran editor’s notes of explanation to readers who criticized front-page photos of gay kisses — in Colorado, from the state House speaker and his partner after passage of a civil unions bills and in North Carolina after the first gay military wedding at Fort Bragg.

As long as the images aren’t meant to shock, but are a reflection of the news of the day, those are the images that the media should be using, said Al Tompkins, a senior faculty member at the Poynter Institute in St. Petersburg, Fla.

“If they got married on the first day the law allowed and they didn’t kiss, it would be news,” he joked. “If they stood there, they got married and they kissed each other, our job is to tell what happened.”

The Post-Gazette received few, if any, complaints after using an image of a same-sex kiss online Wednesday.

Given that same-sex couples have been present on mainstream network television for decades, Thompson noted that it’s actually taken quite a while for same-sex kisses to regularly appear in news media.

“By the time stuff made it to network television back in the network era, it meant that the controversy was kind of over,” he said. “This is taking some time but it’s happening — there’s no question about it.”

Rules for posting comments

Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum.

Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Stephens Media LLC is not liable for messages from third parties.

IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.

Do not post:

Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.

Obscene, explicit, or racist language.

Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.

Personal attacks, insults or threats.

The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.

Comments unrelated to the story.

If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.