>> TSM, you can't talk common sense with these people because they keep shifting the goalposts every time some flaw is pointed out in their Straw man fantasy arguments.

At first we were compared to the chimpanzee.<<

Hey BJ,

“Shifting the goalposts” from Chimpanzees to Bonobos as you imply that I did above is Not a Straw Man, just like I pointed out in my previous post to you that the “Bonobos are Not a Straw Man” so that’s the second time you accused me of using a Straw Man when I did NOT create a Straw Man!!! Even if you are not making any reference to me, “Shifting the goalposts” from Chimpanzees to Bonobos is Not a Straw Man, just like the “Bonobos are Not a Straw Man.”

In order to help you and everyone else understand what a Straw Man is, I choose the Bonobos over Chimpanzees and Gorillas and by you, BJ, saying that I’m “shifting the goalposts” or anyone else is “shifting the goalposts” YOU are the one, BJ, who is creating a Straw Man. Either you don’t know what a Straw Man is or you’re hoping other people don’t now what a Straw Man is.

For those who might be interested in who is creating a Straw Man, here is a snippet from my file on The Straw Man Fallacy.

The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores the actual opposing argument and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated, or misrepresented version of that position. A "Straw Man Argument" is a misrepresentation of the opposing view, set up in such a way that it is easy to demolish. This is meant to bring the opponent's position into disrepute, by ascribing to him positions that he never endorsed. The intention is to avoid having to address the real arguments. A person creates a Straw Man as an easy opponent, because he is not capable of dealing with the issue that actually WAS presented. The person creating a Straw Man hopes to burden his opponent with an unpopular, or indefensible, position. The use of tactic is actually an admission of defeat on the question that was actually presented, and was evaded."

For those paying attention, I addressed every point BJ made in my previous Post and his reply was to create a Straw Man, which is “an admission of defeat”!!!

>>I think we were more likely visited by aliens from another galaxy, and their low level beings were probably cross bread with our homo sapiens at some point.<<

I have no doubt that we have been visited by Aliens and if they wanted to Control us and use us, all they would have to do is (1) teach us how to Master Fire (if we had not already done so) and (2) teach us How to Cook our Food (if we had not already done so) and (3) Control Every Major Sector of Human Endeavor to make sure that they Control EVERYTHING related to Health so that the vast majority of us remain Sick and are easy to Control.

Once again, I have no doubt that we have been visited by Aliens and whether or not they are the ones pulling the strings or it’s just the Sickest of the Sickest of us who are pulling the strings, the only thing that matters is for us to stop getting Distracted and get Re-Connected and the only way to get Re-Connected is with a Raw Organic Vegan Diet.

But remember, we have 2 Group of Needs that we must Satisfy and in many ways, BJ, you remind me a lot of chris (aka powerlifer/lifter/liar aka the recent troll on this website that Doug rightfully banned) in that I had dozens of conversations with chris and I know he never understand or didn’t want to acknowledge what I call the Science and Art of Healing or the Science and Art of Solving Problems that are 100% Within our Control and I’ve had dozens of conversations with you too and it seems that you too don’t understand or don’t want to acknowledge that we have “2 Groups of Needs” we must Satisfy. The big difference between you two is that it was chris who made me keep coming up with more ways to explain the Science and the Art, so I’m sure I know where chris is coming from, but I’m not so sure with you.

So tell me BJ, do you understand “what I mean” by saying that we have “2 Groups of Needs”?

If you don’t understand “what I mean” by saying that we have “2 Groups of Needs,” could you PLEASE tell me what you don’t understand because Satisfying those “2 Groups of Needs” is the Common Link to Solving every Problem that is 100% Within our Control, Conquering Nations and Controlling the Masses and that Common Link has to do with Satisfying “2 Groups of Needs” and based on what you keep posting I get the impression that you do NOT understand “what I mean” by saying that we have “2 Groups of Needs.”

So PLEASE help me out BJ!

What don’t you understand about those “2 Groups of Needs” because Satisfying those “2 Groups of Needs” EXPLAINS everything about How to Live and How to Adapt?

To makes things simple to understand, here is a quick recap:

1. 2 Groups of Needs2. (1st Group) - The Science and (2nd Group) -The Art.3. (1st Group) - The Law of Cause & Effect and (2nd Group) - The Ripple Effect.4. (1st Group) - Linear and (2nd Group) - Circular.5. (1st Group) - How to Live and (2nd Group) - How to Adapt.6. (1st Group) - Remove the Primary Causes and (2nd Group) - Deal with the Subsequent Causes, as well as the Subsequent Needs. 7. (1st Group) - The Oneness of Disease and (2nd Group) - The Uniqueness of Disease.8. (1st Group) - The Anatomical Limitations we were given at birth and (2nd Group) - The Anatomical Limitations from making Mistakes (Not Satisfying our Essential Needs) that have Damaged Ourselves, Society and the Environment.

It’s the Damage that we’ve done to Ourselves, Society and the Environment that creates another Group of Needs that we must Satisfy.

So BJ, PLEASE help me out and tell me what you don’t understand about these “2 Groups of Needs”?