This paper is based on a longer paper developed by the authors for the ACP–ASIM End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel.

Acknowledgments: The End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel thanks the Greenwall Foundation for its support of the development of the original paper and Dr. Joan Teno and Ms. Jean Brontoli for permission to use the figures that report their work.

Abstract

Most people in developed countries will live with a serious, eventually fatal, chronic condition for months or years before dying; yet, the delivery of health care services has only just recently begun adapting to this reality. Quality improvement methods have been effective in helping clinical services to make substantial changes quickly.

Quality improvement requires stating an aim, measuring success, and testing possible improvements. The testing of changes requires a clinical team to Plan, Do, Study, and Act on new insights (the “PDSA cycle“). Repeated PDSA cycles generate deep understanding of complex systems and make sustainable improvements rapidly.

This paper discusses a composite case study in a nursing home setting, which builds on experience with multisite collaborative efforts and introduces quality improvement methods in the context of end-of-life care.

*For members of the End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel, see the Appendix.