I was screwing around with some of the motors from my old Lego Mindstorms kit, and discovered that when two motors were directly connected to one another the spinning of one would cause the other to spin too. It was obvious once I realized what was going on, but still strange to see the other motor spinning without being connected to anything but the other motor.

Step 1: Parts

The only things really needed to do this experiment are the motor and the power wire connector. To demonstrate on a second motor you need a second motor, to measure the voltage you need a multimeter, to demonstrate on an LED you need an LED, etc. A rubber wheel is also a good idea because it will be easier to grip then the axle coming from the motor.

Step 2: Procedure

Connect the power wire to the motor, put the wheel on the motor.

If you are demonstrating on another motor:
-connect the power wire to another motor with a wheel on it.
-spin one of the wheels and notice how the other wheel will spin
-to get the wheel to spin in the other direction reverse the polarity of the wire connections by unplugging the square connector and plugging it back in facing the other direction

If you are demonstrating on a potentiometer:
-connect the square power piece on the end of the wire to the 2 leads from the potentiometer
-set it to 20v dc and spin the wheel as hard as you can, from just running it on the desk the highest I generated was 19v
-optional: connect the motor to a dremel or a power drill and see how much voltage you can get it to generate

If you are demonstrating with a LED:
-connect the square power piece to the LED (I used the same LEDs that were used for the throwies)
-spin the wheel, the LED should light up, if not check polarity

I'm 38 yrs old and have never had a car drivers' license. Excuse me if I'm off here - and please correct me. It has always puzzled me why there are no magnet generators installed on every wheel that spins on every vehicle that travels - cars - bikes - trikes - shopping carts?. Now I know I'm getting a bit hyperbolic but - really - why is this energy wasted. Another thing I will just throw out there is if we could use capillary action (or some other currently overlooked action) to raise water above sea level we could harness the power of it's descent through big pipes (think flushing the toilet) to drive turbines. Nice post sir.

ever ride a bike with the dynamo (for the lights) on? ul notice that ul have to kick harder, so, more energy used, for less energy output. on a car, this already is being used for things as the battery (for starting the engine, lights, dashboard, etc) but the energy that is needed (gas/diesel) to generate other kinds of energy (elektricity) is equal, but mostly a bit less since theres a small resistance from the wiring. so, it would actually wasting energy... i already thought of that, and its a nice experiment :)

btw, if ul make this experiment (with that lego thingies) large enough, ul notice that the second engine is *slightly* spinning slower...

only when brakes are applied plus it is not set up to collect on every wheel if there where 'good' enough batteries and enough of them it would be beneficial to collect power from every wheel btw: alternator is only from the engine spinning (as for you hoihoi151 I am 14 years old)

I second that simple yet completely correct explanation, bcuz of that you gould need a sort of engaging, disengaging system to activate/deactivate when accelerating/braking plus 4 that size it would probably have to b a non magnetic generator, not to go into much detail its uses electromagnetism adn well it get more complicated from there on thus it is used in modern Eco-friendly cars with "regenerative braking systems" but still present technology offers a very poor cost/benefit factor in these kind of stuff

Yes. Now I have the correct terms! "This" energy is not being wasted. We are combusting chemicals into kinetic energy (movement). The kinetic energy is making us move forward (or reverse for that matter). For every reaction we make there is an equal reaction, but it's efficiency is never 100%. If it was 100% we would have perpetual motion, which defies the laws of physics. Now if we did your suggestion, the process would this be: Chemical Energy (fuel burning) to Kinetic Energy (the pistons moving, the wheels turning) to Magnetic Energy (an magnet moving in and out of a coil etc.) to Electrical Energy (electrical charge) The more reactions, the more energy wasted in undesired forms. Whereas kinetic energy is not an undesired form.

no offense but that is the most ridiculous thing i have ever heard. ok where would they store this electricity and how would they transport it off the shoppin cart or item of choice? and its really expensive for very little electricity. also raising water above sea level isnt as easy a turning on a tap. and ur now what 39 or 40. GET A DRIVER LICENSE. what is stoppin u from driving?

Glad you boys are experimenting, learning on your own. There's not much that's revolutionary here, it's essentially the same process as water spinning a turbine/generator in a hydroelectric dam, and sending the power over miles of wire to a home where a circular saw runs. One motor spinning the other. The key is you figured it out by yourself! Experimenting is what moves America forward! I played with LEGOs myself as a boy, even though they've come a long ways since those years.

So don't let the naysayers and their insults get to ya. Even if they are right about limited application of this particular trick (DC power loss over wires of any length, no perpetual motion due to friction/heat loss), it doesn't mean there aren't discoveries to be made. Critics don't invent and they don't get patents either! They just get frownier and more bitter and sarcastic.

So keep it up with the experimenting! Thousands of engineers the world over are doing similar work

the energy created would equal the energy exerted. So its like using a gas generator to power a light to power a solar panel. And its patent. And electric cars have been patented. But if you dont believe me, do some searching here:http://www.google.com/patents

That's an old trick that (if I recall correctly) originated from a japanese lego bot builder, who made walkers you controlled by turning a motor alternatively left and right. It's good for making a steerable car, too.

I tried this with a 3V-motor and I can't get any reading in the multimeter when set to voltage, and only a few microamperes in current mode. The shaft was moving very fast in my trials (I attached it to a wheel on my bike and rode it) and I know that the motor works ok (I mean as a motor), so which do you think the problem is? Can it be the fact that the motor is not a steeper motor? Thanks!

i got the same problem with a small 3v generator found in hand-held fans. i attached it to my bike and even at top speed, it put out only about 1v. then i found out that 3v of power from batteries turns the axle far faster than my bike, thus the lower output. the efficiency of the generator can also affect the output. i decided to find myself a 10v generator often found in higher-end r/c cars. it doesn't put out 10v, but it puts out enough to power a bike light.

nah its ok if its not a stepper motor as long as it uses magnets to generate the magnetic field inside, it could also be what the guy below me said maybe you are not puting enough rpm's through the axle