Atheism is just silly.

To prove something doesn't exist, first there needs to be a proof showing its existence. The rules of the existence of god need to be set by the
people who made up the myth. If they can not do that, then there is nothing other than myth.

*A HA! Moment* So you can't prove that it doesn't exist without proving that it does exist LOL

By your logic, yes, you need a proof for that.

I'm telling you that is my belief and that is how it works. It's not my fault if you don't believe me, and frankly, I'm not worried that you
don't.

Where did I say that?
There is no knowledge in myth.

My original question was towards Vixen and their claim to knowledge, and you stepped and said something that suggests you're sticking up for their
thought. What you said really didn't even have anything to do with Vixen's quote, but for some reason, my question reminded you of something you
think is silly theists will say.

Proof.

Proof????

Your line of thought:"The guy wants proof now does he? Oh that reminds me of silly theists soooooo much, that I'm going to tell the world about
it!!!"

I will make it simpler for you, since your intellectual capability seems to be dwindling with every post you make.

Judge: I think you committed a murder, even though I have no evidence to base this conclusion off of. Call it faith. I sentence you to life in
prison.

edit on 3-27-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)

A lot of times it comes down to that, and it has nothing to do with theism or atheism. Ever heard of DNA evidence exonerating people decades after
they were imprisoned?

Again, you could have said, "Hamburgers, why? Because I the whole thing."

I am an atheist ([a] without [theist] belief in a deity) because there is no proof to back the mythical claim of the existence of a god.

edit
on 3-27-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)

Now, the first definition, you should be OK with, but the second definition should offend your sensibilities a lot. Why? Because the only kind of
person that can have a non-belief is a someone that has never heard of the concept of God to come to a belief either way.

What kind of person is that?

Babies.

By affirming that this definition describes your situation, you're saying you are of a baby's mind.

Now is that true? Maybe hamburgers were a bad idea. How about a bottle?

Just admit it, you do have a belief regarding the existence of God and your belief is that God doesn't exist.

currently there are other more prudent problems in the world (like feeding it!)

I have always heard that if you feed the world (not human flesh btw aspiring atheist's) it would end all war as we know it... When wars break out like
in the 60's our most turbulent time and of the social issues which bled all the way down to the streets... gave rise to pretty much all the serial
killers we have been educated about in criminology shows. (even the scientist agree on this)

I am an atheist ([a] without [theist] belief in a deity) because there is no proof to back the mythical claim of the existence of a god.

edit
on 3-27-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)

Now, the first definition, you should be OK with, but the second definition should offend your sensibilities a lot. Why? Because the only kind of
person that can have a non-belief is a someone that has never heard of the concept of God to come to a belief either way.

What kind of person is that?

Babies.

By affirming that this definition describes your situation, you're saying you are of a baby's mind.

Now is that true? Maybe hamburgers were a bad idea. How about a bottle?

Just admit it, you do have a belief regarding the existence of God and your belief is that God doesn't exist.

Or bottle? Which is it?

It seems the one with the child's mind is you. Can't even act mature!

And now you are showing you are very uneducated in the meaning of words
See that word 'disbelief?'

Originally posted by paradox
Sorry bud. Maybe that will work on someone else.

edit on 3-27-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)

You're just like the people that I used to go to church with.

"The world is only 6,000 years old, you can't convince me otherwise."

If you could look up your name in the dictionary and it had the definition of 'baby' next to it, would you believe it? LOL I'm sure you'd think
about it a lot. It might even cause you to go into denial.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.