People don’t understand. One person may lose a greater number than a number. It only takes a few points on a commander to make all the difference. You use a 70 percent commander you will lose almost double troops compared to a 90 percent commander.
Plus different formations with different commanders yeild different results due to tools soldiers ect. Alot of times it makes sense for me to go up the middle and one flank but yet I never do it cause I can do more multi attacks by always attacking both end flanks. It requires less soldiers.

I always do this give a lsot of 30 soldiers with 90% melee:first 2 waves fake in center and left. Third wave left full melee 10 ladders center 1 soldier4 wave left same without tools. center full melee 10 rams and ladders.

I have tried both of the above listed attack approaches, with 54% Melee+Commander und 2handed swordsmen-I am still loosing about 50-75 Soldiers; in compliance with the former spy report (prior to June4th) I was losing 35-36 soldiers – does anyone have a better attack strategy for the changed formation? Thanks!

You can do a similar attack as Kamath, but you can use ranged troops also.
For this to work well you’ll want a CMD’r with at least +70% range or better.
I myself have vet troops now and use them, with them you can have the loss around 24 troops. If you use Crossbow of the Kingsguard (From the daily tasks 80 pt reward) you can have your losses down to about 16.

I list some troops as best loot, those will not fight and are there to just collect loot. I use my vet. maceman as they hold more loot than the vet. crossbowman. Fill all four waves for max loot.

If your a lower level and don’t have 4 waves, that’s ok, you can still do it.

Laberburg, at center only 1 martyr is enough if u put 2 martyrs then army at keep is reduced hence increasing the loss. And in center 1 martyr is used jst to remove the flaming arrow. Wall bonus can be compensated with wall tools. But if manlets r used then your army will be slower and hence reduced chance of hitting towers. What i have posted is an economical attack with less loss. This way you get more profit of rubies.

You guys have to realize every attack suggestion for each spy report is based off of a naked commander. if you have a commander with -wall bonus then you don’t need to send as many wall tools. If you have a commander that has 45% ranged and 65% melee then you need to figure out what fits for you. I have used these set ups with my 90% melee and 90% ranged commander and have had very good results. My suggestion is that if your commander has equal ranged and melee bonuses and you follow his suggestions you’ll have lower troop losses. I’m not saying they will be 0 because the Dragon fortress in fire peaks is a troop hound. Losses are just sometimes unavoidable.

Indeed, SirEthaniel. These reports are based on a commander with null buffs.

Bad form, bad etiquette, I say. How can one find it in themselves to direct anger at the person who painstakingly gathered all this valuable data together, put up a site for it, and still continues to pay for the domain name to this day?

To all those who would slander – By what right do you complain? You have proven yourself a selfish and eternally demanding audience that is undeserving of Begar’s hard work and attention, let alone the money he spends on the upkeep of this website.