There’s no way the Electoral College will wrest the presidency away from Donald Trump when electors meet in 50 state capitals on Monday.

That’s according to The POLITICO Caucus — a panel of activists, operatives and strategists in 11 key battleground states.

Of the more than 160 Republican and Democratic insiders surveyed last week, only one thought it was likely that 37 or more GOP electors would defect to deny Trump a majority.

Trump’s status as president-elect isn’t certified until Monday, when electors will meet across the nation to cast their ballots officially. If electors vote according to their state tallies, Trump will earn 306 electoral votes, to 232 for Hillary Clinton.

But Trump’s critics have cited a number of reasons for electors to think twice about backing the president-elect, even if Trump won more votes in their states: Trump finished more than 2 percentage points behind Clinton in the national popular vote; his unprecedented, potential financial conflicts; and U.S. intelligence judgments that Russian state-sponsored hackers stole Democratic Party communications in order to help Trump win.

More than 70 percent of insiders said the number of so-called “faithless electors” will be fewer than 10.

That is in keeping with a Republican National Committee whip count that reported just one of the 306 GOP electors was planning to cast a vote against Trump.

A group of Democratic electors hoping to persuade their Republican counterparts to vote against Trump are urging them to unite behind a consensus GOP candidate. Most of these Democrats have said they will not cast their votes for Hillary Clinton, but their efforts are highly unlikely to succeed and it’s unclear how many of them will follow through.

“There is enough dissatisfaction with Trump for there to be defectors, but I can’t see it being serious,” said an Ohio Republican — who, like all insiders, completed the survey anonymously. “The voters spoke and the electors will largely honor their voices.”

“This whole notion of a faithless Electoral College is an anti-Trump fantasy,” an Iowa Republican added. “That said, one or two could vote against Trump and for Hillary or someone else. As uncomfortable as I am with a Trump presidency, I’d be far more uncomfortable with the precedent of a wild Electoral College that simply dumps 200-plus years of history and decides on their own to invalidate the voters’ will.”

“It is complete nonsense to think that Republicans electors will vacate their support for President-elect Trump because of bunch of liberal actors run a silly commercial asking them to change their vote,” said the Republican. “Get over it!”

“Having been an elector myself, I know that most are hard-core supporters,” added a Virginia Democrat. “Any defector has to face the people at home, and this time the other side is very much armed.”

But there is a small segment of insiders, mostly Democrats, who believe the electors should work to overturn Trump’s victory. Trump carried seven of the 11 battleground states — including his narrow but decisive victories in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

“We are in uncharted, unprecedented territory,” a New Hampshire Democrat said. “A president-elect who lost the popular vote by over two percentage points utilized Russian influence to get elected. He also will be in violation of the emoluments clause of the Constitution on the first minute of office. He also may be getting us into a war with China. Finally, we have no knowledge of what debts or entanglements he has towards Russia or other nations’ oligarchs. In theory, I don’t believe electors should ever deviate from what their state’s results dictate. In reality, our country is on the precipice of losing its democracy. This is not hyperbole. Our electors must save us from this, whether by choosing Hillary or some Republican who does not violate so many norms.”

In a choose-your-own-adventure universe in which the Electoral College spurns Trump, it might require Clinton electors to join with Republicans to find an alternative candidate. But only 26 percent of Democratic insiders want the party’s 232 electors to shun Clinton and back a different challenger — 74 percent do not.

“It isn’t worth the effort. It sucks. We lost,” said a Florida Democrat. “Sure, Trump is entirely unqualified. Yes, his transition has been a disaster. And of course, the Russians, the FBI, the B.S. Benghazi Committee and the fake news played a huge role in the outcome. But we need to stop giving false hope and start rebuilding the Democratic Party.”

The most intense partisan disagreement among insiders was on the question of whether hackers affiliated with Russia’s government actively worked to boost Trump. Democrats were nearly unanimous: 97 percent agree that the Russians helped Trump win.

“This isn’t even debatable anymore,” a Florida Democrat said. “I’ll freely acknowledge the Clinton operation did plenty to contribute to their own demise, but Trump’s buddy Vladimir provided the final bullet.”

But only 35 percent of Republicans agreed, with 65 percent saying they don’t think the Russians were involved in an effort to get Trump elected.

“Other campaigns also came under repeated cyber attacks this summer. They saw it, stopped it, and changed [their] network,” an Iowa Republican said. “The fact that the DNC and Team Hillary were too damn dumb or slow to foil the attacks is no one’s fault but their own.”

“Liberals need to undermine the legitimacy of a GOP victory,” added an Ohio Republican. “They did it from the start with George W. Bush, and this is their tactic to never accept Trump as legitimate.”

Some Republicans, however, expressed frustration with members of their own party for refusing to accept the apparent conclusions of U.S. intelligence officials.

“Republicans who try to spin this as sour grapes are doing a disservice to the Republic,” a New Hampshire Republican said. “This wasn’t an attack on a single candidate; it was an attack on democracy intended to undermine the credibility of freedom and constitutional democracies.”

These are the members of The POLITICO Caucus, not all of whom participated in this survey: