Jesse Slade and Associates has been helping injured federal employees with their OWCP claims since 2007. If you need help with your OWCP claim, contact Jesse at owcpslayer@gmail.com
All material on this blog is copyrighted material unless otherwise indicated.

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

OWCP has adopted the
following definitions from the Selected Characteristics of Occupations
Defined in the Revised Dictionary of Occupational Titles (where
applicable), which should be used when comparing the claimant’s established
work restrictions to the physical requirements of positions identified in
the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

These definitions
indicate the absence or presence and frequency of the physical demand
components requested on the OWCP-5b and OWCP-5c.

While these definitions
are used by OWCP under Vocational Rehabilitation, they can also be used to
determine if a job offer is within the claimant’s physical restrictions if the
claimant’s strength level has been decided (such as after an FCE).

STRENGTH LEVEL:

Sedentary Work - Sedentary Work involves exerting up to 10 pounds
of force occasionally or a negligible amount of force frequently to lift,
carry, push, pull, or otherwise move objects, including the human body.
Sedentary work involves sitting most of the time, but may involve walking or
standing for brief periods of time. Jobs may be defined as sedentary when
walking and standing are required only occasionally and all other sedentary
criteria are met. Occasionally: activity or condition exists up to 1/3 of the time. Frequently: activity or condition exists from 1/3 to 2/3 of the time.

Light Work - Light Work involves exerting up to 20 pounds of
force occasionally or up to 10 pounds of force frequently, or a negligible
amount of force constantly to move objects. Physical demand requirements are in
excess of those for sedentary work.

Even though the weight
lifted may be only a negligible amount, a job/occupation is rated as light work
when it requires: (1) walking or standing to a significant degree; (2) sitting
most of the time while pushing or pulling arm or leg controls; or (3) working
at a production rate pace while constantly pushing or pulling materials even
though the weight of the materials is negligible. (The constant stress and
strain of maintaining a production rate pace, especially in an industrial
setting, can be and is physically demanding of a worker even though the amount
of force exerted is negligible.)

Medium Work - Medium Work involves exerting 20 to 50 pounds of
force occasionally or 10 to 25 pounds of force frequently or an amount greater
than negligible and up to 10 pounds constantly to move objects. Physical demand
requirements are in excess of those for light work.

Heavy Work - Heavy work involves exerting 50 to 100 pounds of
force occasionally, or 25 to 50 pounds of force frequently, or 10 to 20 pounds
of force constantly to move objects. Physical demand requirements are in excess
of those for medium work.

Very Heavy Work - Very Heavy Work involves exerting in excess of
100 pounds of force occasionally, or in excess of 50 pounds of force frequently
or in excess of 20 pounds of force constantly to move objects. Physical demand
requirements are in excess of those for heavy work.

Limits of Weights Lifted/Carried/Pushed/Pulled

Rating

Occasionally

Frequently

Constantly

Sedentary

* - 10

*

N/A

Light

* - 20

* - 10

*

Medium

20 - 50

10 - 25

* - 10

Heavy

50 - 100

25 - 50

10 - 20

Very Heavy

100 +

50 +

20 +

* = negligible weight; N/A = Not Applicable

The range excludes the
lower number and includes the higher number, i.e., the range 10 - 25 excludes
10 (beginning at 10+) and includes 25, the range 25-50 excludes 25 (beginning
at 25+) and includes 50.

Presence and/or
Frequency of Other Physical Demands
this chart should be referenced to determine the frequency of demands for the
remaining physical components of a given job.

Code

Frequency

Definition

Max hrs./8 hr. day

N

Not Present

Activity/condition does not exist

0

O

Occasionally

Activity/condition exists up to 1/3 of the time

2 hrs. 40 min.

F

Frequently

Activity/condition exists from 1/3 to 2/3 of the time

5 hrs. 20 min.

C

Constantly

Activity/condition exists 2/3 or more of the time

8

REACHING:

Extending hand(s) and arm(s) in any direction, including overhead
reaching or reaching above shoulder level.

TWISTING:

Turning, twisting, contorting, or flexing the torso in any
direction towards the right or left.

BENDING/STOOPING:

Bending body downward and forward by bending the spine at the
waist, requiring full use of the lower extremities and back muscles.

OPERATING A MOTOR
VEHICLE AT WORK:

Driving any vehicle while in performance of the work duties.

REPETITIVE MOVEMENTS OF ELBOWS
(HANDLING):

Seizing, holding, grasping, turning, or otherwise working with the
hand or hands using the whole arm.

REPETITIVE MOVEMENTS OF
WRISTS (FINGERING):

Picking, pinching, or otherwise working primarily with fingers and
wrists rather than the whole arm as in handling.

SQUATTING (CROUCHING):

Bending of the body downward and forward by bending the legs and the
spine.

KNEELING:

Bending the legs at knees and coming to rest on one or both knees.

CLIMBING:

Ascending or descending ladders, stairs, scaffolding, ramps,
poles, and the like by using the feet and legs or the hands and arms. Body
agility is emphasized.

Environmental Conditions Definitions:

This chart should be referenced to determine the frequency of exposure of the
listed environmental components.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

OWCP has revised the FECA Manual regarding job
offers. This article concentrates on Abandonment of a Suitable Job.

Formal
Loss of Wage Earning Capacity, (LWEC) issued:

If a formal LWEC has been issued, OWCP must
develop the evidence to determine if modification of the LWEC is appropriate.

No
formal Loss of Wage Earning Capacity, (LWEC) issued:

If no formal LWEC has been issued and a claimant returns to work and then stops working
and submits a claim for compensation, OWCP must make a finding of suitability.

OWCP should evaluate any evidence submitted by
the claimant and the reasons for the work stoppage.

If the evidence does not establish a
recurrence and OWCP has determined the job is suitable, OWCP must advise the
claimant that the job is suitable and that refusal of the job offer may result
in the penalty provision of 5 U.S.C. §8106(c). OWCP should also advise the
claimant of the evidence necessary to establish a recurrence of disability.
OWCP must allow the claimant 30 days to submit his or her response.

If the claimant receives OWCP’s letter and then
returns to work, OWCP should write the claimant and explain the basis for his/her
ongoing compensation (if any).

OWCP will then monitor the claimant’s employment
so a formal LWEC determination (if appropriate) can be made after the claimant
has worked 60 days.

If the claimant receives OWCP’s letter and does
not respond, OWCP will issue a formal decision under §8106 (c) of the Act which
terminates any further compensation for wage loss as well as any entitlement to
a schedule award.

The claimant’s entitlement of medical expenses
for treatment of the accepted condition is not terminated.

If the claimant receives OWCP’s letter and
provides a response, OWCP must carefully evaluate the response. OWCP should
evaluate whether a recurrence has been established by the claimant.

If the criteria to establish a recurrence are
met, the claim for recurrence should be accepted and no further action will be
taken with regard to abandonment of suitable work.

If the criteria to establish a recurrence are
not met, OWCP must evaluate the reasons given for the work stoppage.

Insufficient
reasons for job abandonment (not a complete list):

The claimant elects to receive disability
retirement rather than working in suitable employment;

The claimant resigned a modified light duty
position without good reason; and

The claimant resigned from his light duty
position to go back to college.

If it is not possible for OWCP to determine if a
claimant’s reason(s) for abandonment are justified, OWCP should take action to
develop the evidence.

If OWCP determines that the abandonment is
justified, OWCP should notify the claimant and the employing agency in writing. The
claimant would be entitled to compensation benefits while OWCP contacts the
employing agency concerning further attempts at reemployment.

OWCP may also refer the claimant for vocational
rehabilitation services for assistance with the placement effort.

If a recurrence has not been established and the
abandonment of the job is not deemed justified, OWCP must advise the claimant
and the employment agency and allow the claimant an additional 15 days to
return to work.

If after receiving the letter from OWCP awarding
an additional 15 days the claimant returns to work, OWCP should issue a letter
explaining the claimant’s right to compensation (if any).

The return to work will be monitored by OWCP so
that if appropriate, a forma LWEC can be made
after the claimant has worked 60 days.

If after receiving the letter from OWCP awarding
an additional 15 days the claimant does not return to work, OWCP will issue a
formal decision under §8106 (c) of the Act which terminates any further compensation for wage loss as well as any entitlement to a schedule award.

The claimant’s entitlement of medical expenses for treatment of the accepted condition is not terminated.

The formal decision should include a description
of the initial return to work and subsequent work stoppage, a detailed
discussion of any development actions taken and any evidence received in
response and an explanation as to why the evidence received was insufficient to
establish both a recurrence of disability and an inability to perform the
duties of the position.

Monday, April 7, 2014

There may be occasions when the employing agency is only able
to provide a temporary light duty assignment to the claimant even though the
claimant held a permanent job at the time of the original injury. OWCP can
determine the light duty assignment is appropriate.

No formal determination
on suitability of a light duty/temporary assignment is required by OWCP and
Maggie Moore rights do not apply to light duty/temporary assignments.

If the claimant held a temporary position at the time of
injury, a temporary job assignment of at least 90 days can be found appropriate by
OWCP.

A temporary light duty job offer may include or consist
of telework.

When the employing agency has provided a temporary light
duty assignment and the claimant is not on the periodic roll and no formal Loss
of Wage Earning Capacity, (LWEC) has been issued, a claim for wage loss
compensation may be filed on Form CA-7.

Under these circumstances, OWCP cannot use the penalty
language of Section 8106(c), but the claimant will be expected to work. Section 8106(c) gives OWCP the authority to
terminate compensation benefits for refusing suitable work.

Upon receipt of the claim
for wage loss compensation (CA-7), OWCP should send a development letter to the
claimant, advising him/her of the standards set forth in §10.500(a) and of the
medical evidence required to substantiate the claim for compensation. The
claimant should be given thirty days to provide the required evidence to OWCP.

§10.500(a): "Compensation
for wage loss due to disability is available only for any periods during which
an employee's work-related medical condition prevents him or her from earning
the wages earned before the work-related injury. An employee is not entitled to
compensation for any wage-loss claimed on a CA-7 to the extent that evidence
contemporaneous with the period claimed on a CA-7 establishes that an employee
had medical work restrictions in place; that light duty within those work
restrictions was available; and that the employee was previously notified in
writing that such duty was available." Where §8106 terminates benefits for
refusing suitable work §10.500 denies compensation only for the claimed period.

Entitlement
to compensation:

To determine if the claimant is entitled to compensation
when no formal LWEC has been issued, OWCP must determine the following:

The evidence establishes the
injury related residuals continue and those residuals result in work
restrictions;

The weight of medical
evidence establishes the claimant has been cleared to return to light duty work
activities;

The light duty
assignment is within the claimant’s restrictions and is available;

The claimant was notified in
writing the light duty assignment is available; and

If not already in the
claimant’s file, OWCP should obtain written documentation the employing agency
notified the claimant in writing of the light duty assignment.

Under these circumstances, compensation is not payable for the period covered by the temporary light
duty assignment. This would begin the effective date of the written
notification the light duty assignment was available.

A claimant’s entitlements to a schedule award or medical
benefits are not affected.

If in response to OWCP’s
development letter the claimant submits evidence that light duty work
was not available for the period in which wage loss compensation was claimed,
or that the light duty assignment is not within his/her restrictions, the
claimant is entitled to compensation for said period.

If the evidence of
record establishes that light duty work within the claimant's restrictions was
in fact available to the claimant for the period claimed and written
notification of the light duty assignment had been provided to the claimant, there
is no entitlement to wage loss compensation.

When making a
determination that an employee was not prevented from earning the wages earned
before the work-related injury, OWCP will NOT make a suitability finding, since
the denial of wage loss compensation under §10.500 is different from the penalty
provision under §8106.

OWCP will not pay for
the hours when light duty within the claimant's work restrictions was available
if there is evidence that the claimant was previously performing light duty or
was notified in writing that such light duty was available.

If the claimant is on
the periodic roll, the general principle regarding medically appropriate light
duty assignments under 20 CFR 10.500(a) is that the assignments in these
instances are temporary in nature.

For instance, a light
duty assignment may be provided to the claimant during a period of recovery
while the claimant's work restrictions are temporary in nature.

A light duty assignment
may be provided to the claimant when s/he has stable and well defined or
permanent restrictions and the employing agency is actively pursuing permanent
employment opportunities to accommodate those restrictions.

Even if a field nurse is
assigned to the case during the claimant's period of recovery, a vocational rehabilitation
counselor can be assigned.

Entitlement to compensation when the claimant is
on the periodic roll:

When offered a light duty assignment while the claimant
is on the periodic roll. OWCP must determine the following to decide if the
claimant is entitled to compensation:

The evidence establishes the injury
related residuals continue and those residuals result in work restrictions. The light duty assignment must take into
account the claimant's work-related condition(s), as well as any preexisting
medical conditions and any conditions which have arisen since the compensable
injury. A light duty assignment that does not consider all such conditions will
not be considered appropriate by OWCP;

Light duty within the claimant’s work
restrictions is available; and

The claimant was notified in writing that such
light duty was available.

A light duty assignment
for a claimant on the periodic roll must be in writing and contain the
following essential elements:

A description of the duties to be performed;

The specific physical requirements of the assignment, including
any special demands of the workload or unusual working conditions;

The organizational and geographical location of the assignment;

The date on which the assignment will be first available and the
end date of the assignment, if any. A light duty assignment based on the
claimant’s permanent restrictions can be provided for a specified period of
time with an end date, but it can also be provided for an indefinite period of
time with no end date specified. If the employing agency’s notification is
clear that the assignment is for a given period (for example, 120 days), a
denial of compensation for a periodic roll recipient will only extend for that
closed period;

The claimant's work schedule (including teleworking);

Pay rate (salary) information; and

The date a response from the claimant to the light duty assignment
is required.

If the employing agency
is only able to provide a temporary light duty assignment when the claimant has
permanent work restrictions, the employing agency must provide written
verification that it is unable to provide a permanent job offer. If this
written verification is in the claimant’s file, a temporary light duty
assignment can be considered appropriate by OWCP. If this written verification
is not on file, OWCP should request this verification in writing from the
employing agency.

If the claimant's work
restrictions are temporary in nature, written verification is not needed from
the employing agency. Written verification is only needed when the claimant's
work restrictions are permanent in nature.

Under these circumstances,
compensation benefits are not payable for the duration of the light duty
assignment. Compensation benefits are payable only for periods which the
claimant’s work-related medical condition prevents him/her from earning the
wages earned before the work-related injury.

When a claimant is in
continuous receipt of wage loss compensation on the periodic roll, there is an
expectation of continued payment. Therefore, the notification and due process
burden when a light duty assignment is offered is greater than when the
claimant is not on the periodic roll.

A pre-termination notice
must be issued to the claimant if OWCP is removing the claimant from the periodic roll and
ceasing his/her wage loss compensation payments.

A pre-reduction notice
must also be issued to the claimant if OWCP is proposing to reduce the claimant's compensation.

A claimant’s entitlements to a schedule award or medical
benefits are not affected.

A light duty assignment
should be provided for the number of hours for which a claimant has been
released to work. When this is not possible, the employing agency may provide a
light duty assignment for fewer hours than the claimant was actually released
to work. As long as the light duty assignment is for at least half of the total
hours that the claimant has been released to work, the light duty assignment
can be considered appropriate by OWCP.

A light duty assignment
of less than 2 hours per day (or totaling 20 hours a pay period) cannot be
considered appropriate.

For example, if the
claimant has been released to work 8 hours per day and the employing agency
offers a light duty assignment of 4 hours per day, OWCP can consider this light duty
assignment appropriate.

If the employing agency
cannot accommodate the full number of hours for which the claimant has been
released to work, the employing agency must provide written verification that
it is unable to provide work for the full number of hours for which the
claimant has been released to work. If this written verification is on file, a
light duty assignment with less than the number of hours the claimant has been released to work can be considered
appropriate.

If this written verification
is not on file, OWCP should request this verification (in writing) from the
employing agency.

If the medical evidence
substantiates that a gradual return to work is necessary, a light duty
assignment must specify the dates of the increased hours corresponding with the
claimant's prescribed restrictions.

The light duty
assignment should be in the location where the employee currently resides. If
this is not practical, the employing agency may provide light duty at the
employee's former duty station if that station is within the claimant's
commuting area.

Reemployment at any
other location may only be considered where the distance between the location
of the light duty assignment and the location where the employee currently
resides is no greater than 50 miles and the employee is physically capable of
performing the commute required. Special travel arrangements through vocational
rehabilitation will not be pursued for temporary assignments.

The 50 mile radius ONLY
applies to light duty/temporary assignments.

If the claimant accepts
the light duty assignment, OWCP should calculate the claimant's entitlement to
compensation in accordance with his or her actual earnings. A letter should be
issued to the claimant by OWCP explaining the basis for reducing or terminating his/her
compensation during the light duty assignment period.

The claimant may be
entitled to partial compensation. If, for example, the claimant receives
compensation based on an 8 hour day and the light duty assignment is for less
than 8 hours, the claimant is entitled to the difference payable by OWCP. So if
the light duty assignment is for 6 hours per day, the claimant would be
entitled to 2 hours of compensation per day from OWCP. If the light duty
assignment is for 4 hours per day, the claimant would be entitled to 4 hours of
compensation per day from OWCP and so on.

Even after 60 days of
employment, OWCP should not consider the case for a wage earning capacity determination,
since the light duty assignment was only temporary. There can be no
determination that the position fairly and reasonably represents the claimant's
wage earning capacity.

If the assignment is
considered appropriate based on the evidence of record and the claimant
declines the offered assignment, or fails to return to work after accepting the
assignment OWCP will issue a notice of proposed termination or reduction of
compensation for the duration of the temporary assignment, whether specified or
indefinite. The claimant should be provided 30 days to respond.

OWCP should advise the
claimant in writing that:

A light duty assignment (identified by name/date) has been
provided that accommodates the claimant's current work restrictions;

The medical evidence used to make this determination should be
identified and a copy should be included with the notice;

The light duty assignment is available effective the start date of
the assignment and remains open through the end date of the assignment, or will
remain available indefinitely;

The claimant will be paid compensation for the difference (if any)
between the pay of the offered assignment and the pay of his/her date of injury
job; and

The claimant can still accept the light duty assignment without
penalty.

If the claimant submits
reasons for declining the light duty assignment within the 30 day period, OWCP
should carefully evaluate the claimant's reasons and determine if they are
valid.

If the claimant's reason(s)
for declining the light duty assignment are deemed justified, OWCP should
notify both the claimant and the employing agency that the claimant will
continue to receive wage loss compensation on the periodic roll.

If the claimant's reason
for declining the light duty assignment is not justified, OWCP will prepare a
formal decision for denial of compensation. OWCP should first confirm with the
employing agency that the temporary assignment is still available.

If it is not possible to
determine whether a claimant's reason for declining the light duty assignment
is justified without further development of the issues, OWCP should contact
the claimant or the employing agency for clarifying information and follow up promptly until the
issue is resolved.

The employing agency should be contacted and asked to keep the light duty
assignment open and available during this period and/or to extend the period of
the temporary assignment. If the employing agency is unable or unwilling to do this, OWCP must discontinue any further consideration of the light duty assignment.

If the claimant accepts
the light duty assignment, compensation will be reduced or terminated. Also, a
letter explaining the basis for the reduction or termination of compensation
will be issued to the claimant. The claimant will be advised to file a CA-2a
(Notice of Recurrence) if further wage loss compensation is claimed either due
to a change in the medical condition or a withdrawal of the light duty
assignment.

A recurrence of disability
does not apply when a light duty assignment is withdrawn for reasons of
misconduct or non-performance of job duties.

If no reply is received
from the claimant and the claimant does not return to work, OWCP will issue a
formal decision on the matter.

When the temporary light
duty assignment ends (or the work is no longer available), the claimant is
again entitled to compensation as long as the medical evidence supports any
disabling residuals of the work-related condition. The claimant should submit
Form CA-2a through the employing agency (or Form CA-7 with verification from
the employing agency that work is no longer available).

In these circumstances,
as long as medical evidence supports that any disabling residuals of the
work-related condition still exist, OWCP should immediately place the
claimant back on the periodic roll.

Payment should not be unnecessarily delayed.

Typically, no development
of evidence is needed prior to reinstating the claimant on the periodic roll
and resuming wage loss compensation.

Formal Decision:

If the temporary light
duty assignment meets OWCP’s criteria, and the claimant has been provided with
a pre-reduction or pre-termination notice, a formal decision reducing or
terminating compensation will be issued by OWCP.

Any modification of
compensation should be preceded by a 30 day notice so that no over payment
results.

OWCP should issue a
formal decision denying the claim for compensation. The decision should only
deny wage loss compensation for the period claimed. The decision should not
terminate all future entitlement to wage loss compensation.

Because the denial of
compensation under 20 C.F.R. §10.500(a) is not a termination of benefits for
refusal to accept suitable work, a formal denial of compensation under 20
C.F.R. §10.500(a) should:

Deny compensation for wage loss, or reduce compensation based upon
the expected wage earning capacity had the light duty assignment been accepted.
The reduction or termination of compensation would be for the duration of the
assignment or indefinitely (depending on whether the light duty assignment was
for a specific period of time or was to be provided indefinitely);

Clearly indicate that the claimant's entitlement to medical care
or eligibility for a schedule award for his/her accepted condition is not
affected by the decision; and

Advise the claimant that s/he may file a Form CA-2a, Notice of
Recurrence, at the end of the temporary assignment period (if applicable) to
claim further wage loss compensation, and that compensation will be paid only
if the light duty assignment was withdrawn or the claimant's medical condition
has worsened.

20 C.F.R. §10.5 (x)
defines a recurrence of disability as "...an inability to work that takes
place when a light-duty assignment made specifically to accommodate an
employee's physical limitations due to his or her work-related injury or
illness is withdrawn, or when the physical requirements of such an assignment
are altered so that they exceed his or her established physical
limitations."

A recurrence of
disability does not apply when a light duty assignment is withdrawn for reasons
of misconduct or non-performance of job duties.

When making a
determination that an employee was not prevented from earning the wages earned
before the work-related injury, OWCP should not make a suitability
determination, since the denial of compensation under §10.500(a) is different
from the penalty provision of §8106.

OWCP should instead
reference the language in §10.500(a): "Compensation for wage loss due to
disability is available only for any periods during which an employee's work-related
medical condition prevents him or her from earning the wages earned before the
work-related injury... an employee receiving continuing periodic payments for
disability was not prevented from earning the wages earned before the
work-related injury if the evidence establishes that the employing agency had
offered, in accordance with OWCP procedures, a temporary light duty assignment
within the employee's work restrictions."

If there still would
have been wage loss if the claimant had accepted the light duty assignment, the
claimant remains entitled to compensation benefits based upon the temporary actual
earnings calculation (just as if s/he had accepted the light duty assignment).

For example, if the
employing agency offered a light duty assignment for 4 hours per day and the
claimant was entitled to 8 hours per day of compensation, OWCP would pay the
claimant 4 hours of compensation per day. The compensation amount would be based on
the wage earning capacity outlined in the light duty assignment.

At some point during your OWCP claims process, you're going to need a narrative medical report from your physician. Your claim won't...

Contact Jesse

Name

Email
*

Message
*

Search This Blog

Translate

Followers

Jesse Slade

Do you need help with your OWCP claim but just can’t afford the attorney or representative’s costly retainer and hourly rate?

I can drastically minimize those fees by ghostwriting whatever you require, helping you with a strategy, review your documents and/or do the research for you to help you help yourself.

From a simple letter to an appeal, no job is too large or too small and my fees are a fraction of what you’ll be charged by an attorney or representative because I charge based on what you need.

It doesn't matter if you need help with one issue or multiple issues, I can supply what you need to help you resolve your claim issues at a reasonable fee.

For those who cannot afford the high price of a full-service attorney or representative, contact OWCP advocate Jesse Slade for a more budget minded approach to help with your OWCP claim and get the help you need at an affordable price.

Jesse Slade is the alternative to high-priced attorneys and representatives.

Contact Jesse at: owcpslayer@gmail.com

Testimonials

"Jesse Slade was my ‘rescue’ to an untenable situation I encountered with OWCP. The deadlines and type of specific documentation claimants must provide from their treating physician to OWCP is non-negotiable. But this does not apply, equally, to OWCP. As a claimant, this lack of quid pro quo is frustrating on various levels (physical, psychological and financial to name a few).

I was sent to a Referee examination (based on manufactured conflict of medical opinion between treating MD and 2nd opinion MD) that lasted less than ten minutes.

But this Referee examination contained conflicting information, yet my employing agency generated a job offer from it. I had to work this new job offer or lose all rightfully earned OWCP benefits but at a cost of new consequential injuries.

With Jesse’s extensive knowledge base in all things OWCP, extensive professional experience and (ultimately) retention of Jesse as my legal representative; in the end, I was successful in having OWCP admit my arguments were justifiable and this specific job offer was unsuitable, along with accepting consequential injuries. Jesse’s total fee was $700.00. This positive outcome would not have occurred without Jesse Slade.” HDW Wisconsin

********************************************

Jesse’s knowledge in all the areas of OWCP regulations is superior to any of the expensive attorneys or other firms.

It was a blessing to see Jesse’s website and it saved me from many issues that involved OWCP.

Jesse is just a great person if you need help dealing with issues involving FECA regulations.

I will always recommend Jesse and thanks so much for being there when I needed you on the issues I have had. T.D. Oklahoma

******************************

To USPS employees, Jesse has been a great help to me in the re-opening of my OWCP case that was close since June 2009 for wrongfully terminate benefits due to the IME! My case was re-opened in Sept 2014. Have patience and don't give up!! Jesse knows the Owcp laws!!

Thank you Jesse and I'm glad you helped me with any questions I had!! God Bless and you’re an Angel to me!! Benefits are still coming and it's been a long time waiting!! A.T.

*******************************************

About 5 months ago while looking for a OWCP attorney I came across a web site called the OWCP classroom, I went over the site and felt like I found the right person, Jesse Slade to handle my OWCP situation so I emailed Jesse and asked for her phone number and I called about my situation.

Prior to Jesse I spoke to an attorney who just wanted me to get an impairment rating so he could get 15% of my award money plus legal fees which I found out from Jesse that it was against the law for an attorney to charge 15% plus fees, so right from there Jesse was the person I needed to handle my case.

Jesse knows the OWCP system and the laws and how it works. I sent my medical records and dr reports to Jesse Slade and she wrote OWCP a letter to my claims examiner asking to add more medical conditions that should of been on my original claim from the get go.

To me Jesse Slade is a life saver and a person I would recommend to anyone who needs help with their OWCP situation. C.N Brooklyn, NY

*****************************************************

The DOL/OWCP can be very complicated and frustrating to navigate and there are many pitfalls you never know about until it is upon you or you are in the pit. I tell people all the time I know more about the Federals Workers Comp process than I ever wanted to know.

Through this gaining of knowledge, that I never wanted, I have used Jesse Slade's expertise and knowledge on a few occasions. I have reached a point, multiple times, that I just could not find the answers.

Jesse is very knowledgeable and knows how to expertly navigate the process as well as give the DOL the exact evidence or cite previous cases that get things moving again.

I highly recommend Jesse to anyone that needs help with DOL/OWCP process. Jesse knows the process and knows the steps to take/boxes to check to cut through all of this government red tape.

I guarantee when the next issue arises, like they always do with the DOL, I will definitely seek counsel and use Jesse Slade to help my family once again. C.S.

I'm a long term OWCP Loss of Wages Compensation, Disability recipient. Over the 30 or so years I've been dealing with OWCP I've found it extremely difficult to make sense of OWCP rules and regulations. So much so that if I happen to be under attack from them, i.e. threatening to cut off my compensation for one reason or another, I stand little chance of making adequate use of OWCP manuals, etc. because my particular PTSD gets activated and all I can do is hang on and try to survive it all.

Since I happened upon the Web Site moderated by Jesse Slade I no longer have to worry about whether or not I understand what OWCP is attempting to do to me because Jesse will explain it in easy to understand language that I can digest even in a heightened state of agitation.

I find this kind of communication extremely valuable. It doesn't matter whether the information has been explained prior, Jesse will still, with deft and patience, explain it all to me again and without the least bit of judgment.

Once I'm able to understand my current situation Jesse will explain what necessary steps I need to take to defend myself from being taken advantage of by OWCP and believe me, they will try and every opportunity to take advantage of someone who may not understand their own situation and what's at stake. I highly recommend Jesse Slade as an advocate for anybody that has to deal with OWCP. K.G., California