"We Jews and Church Leaders have known since the beginning of Christianity that it was synthesized by the Roman Piso family for the purpose of maintaining control over the masses and to placate slaves.

And, this is why we Jews are the “Chosen People” and why we have endured so much for so many years; we are witnesses to the lie. Our ancestors wrote what they could about this in our texts.”

WHO WROTE THE NEW TESTAMENT?

The authorship of the New Testament books have been discovered. For years, the book “The True Authorship of the New Testament” has been out and many persons have been discovering this as well.

Now, we feel that it is time to put this information out on the Net. There has been a few WebPages on the Net telling about how and why the Roman Piso family authored the New Testament. But there had yet to be the information on who wrote each of the New Testament books. So, here you will find out who wrote what. There is enough information here so that persons can grasp the fact that this is real and that they can research it further as well as find books that will help to explain this in more detail.

Soon, there will be new books out that will enable even the person to do their own research on this and to verify it. Our goal in all of this is to get this out to as many persons as possible and to see more and more persons writing on this subject. Look for books on the subject of: ‘The Piso Theory’, and of ‘The New Classical Scholarship’.

We have determined that the book of Mark was the first of the Gospels to have been written and so we will always list Mark before Matthew.

THE NT BOOKS:MARK:The gospel of Mark was written in a prototype form before it was later crafted into the form that we are familiar with. The earlier version was called ‘Ur Marcus’ and is also known/called ‘Q’ (for ‘Quelle’, which is German for the ‘source’).

Our latest findings regarding the early version of Mark show that this was written at about the time of Claudius Caesar, by the grandfather of Arrius Piso. That version was apparently only a bare sketch and most likely did not give a name to the ‘messiah’. That appears to have been done later by the person who actually played ‘Jesus’ in the Gospels - Arrius Piso

The version that we are familiar with was written about the year 73 CE by Arrius Calpurnius Piso. Arrius Piso was a Roman on his father’s side, but a descendant of King Herod on his mother’s side and therefore he knew well about the Jewish religion. He was also a close relative to the Flavians and even though secretly he could inherit and use the Flavian name by his mother’s descent from them, he gave a story about receiving it from the emperor Vespasian (in his other identity as Flavius Josephus).

MATTHEW:Matthew too, was authored by Arrius Calpurnius Piso. This was written about the year 75 CE.

LUKE:Was written 85-90 CE by Arrius C. Piso and Pliny the Younger.

JOHN:The 4th Gospel, or the Gospel of John was written by Justus Calpurnius Piso, a son of Arrius C. Piso. This son was very much like this father in his hatred towards humanity. This Gospel was written circa 105 CE.

ACTS:The Acts of the Apostles was written by Arrius Piso and his son Justus, with some help from Pliny the Younger 96-100 CE. By the way, there is a portion of Acts that is missing from most English translations/interpretations. That is the 29th Chapter, which has 10 verses.

ROMANS:The epistle to the Romans was written by another son of Arrius Piso (Proculus Piso) and Claudia Phoebe about the year 100. Claudia Phoebe is known in history as the wife of the emperor Trajan (as Pompeia Plotina). She wrote the last few verses of this epistle, which many copies of the NT in English leave out because that portion was written by a woman. This is obvious, and she even gives her name as ‘Phoebe’. You can tell where the previous male author leaves off and the female author begins because the male author “signs off” with ‘Amen’. She wrote the last verses (25-27) of Romans, Chapter 16.

1st CORINTHIANS, GALATIONS, and EPHESIANS:were all written between 100-103 CE by Pliny the Younger.

2nd CORINTHIANS and PHILIPPIANS:were written by Justus C. Piso between 103-105 CE.

COLOSSIANS:was written by Justus C. Piso and his son Julianus (Julianus was the father of the emperor Marcus Aurelius, but this is seen in history only by his use of another name ‘Verus’).

1st TIMOTHY:was written by Pliny the Younger circa 105 CE.

2nd TIMOTHY:was written by Justus C. Piso (also known in history by other names), c. 107 CE.

1st and 2nd THESSALONIANS:were written by Justus C. Piso and his son Julianus with some help from his nephew Silanus between the years 105-110 CE.

TITUS:was written by Pliny the Younger circa 103-105 CE.

PHILEMON:was written by Justus C. Piso and his son Julianus.

JAMES:was written by Justus C. Piso around 110 CE.

1st and 2nd PETER:were written by Proculus Piso between 110-115 CE.

1st, 2nd and 3rd JOHN:were written by Julius Calpurnius Piso (who was still another son of Arrius Calpurnius Piso), between 110-115 CE.

JUDE:was written by Julius C. Piso also, between the years 110-115 CE.

THE REVELATION OF JOHN THE DIVINE:was written by Julius Calpurnius Piso, who may have been the son of the other Julius Calpurnius Piso (who had the same name), and this was written in or about the year 137 CE. It was not the book of the NT, just written as the end of the story.

HEBREWS:This was written by a grandson of Arrius Piso named Flavius Arrianus circa 140 CE. Flavius Arrianus was the real name of the historian who wrote as ‘Appian’. This person was the half-brother of the emperor Antoninus Pius. Antoninus Pius, by the way, also wrote history under the name of Suetonius. Flavius Arrianus also wrote other works, most notably, he wrote under the name of ‘Ptolemy’.

FROM CHAPTER 1 of The True Authorship of the New Testamentby Abelard Reuchlinfrom TheRomanPisoForum Website“The New Testament, the Church, and Christianity, were all the creation of the Calpurnius Piso(pronounced Peso w/ long “E”) family (a), who were Roman aristocrats. The New Testament andall the characters in it—Jesus, all the Josephs, all the Marys, all the disciples, apostles, Paul, andJohn the Baptist—are all fictional.”

“The Pisos created the story and the characters; they tied the story into a specific time and place inhistory; and they connected it with some peripheral actual people, such as the Herods, Gamaliel, theRoman procurators, etc. But Jesus and everyone involved with him were created (that is, fictional!)characters.”

“In the middle of the first century of our present era, Rome’s aristocracy felt itself confronted with agrowing problem. The Jewish religion was continuing to grow in numbers, adding ever moreproselytes. Jews numbered more than 8,000,000, and were 10% of the population of the empireand 20% of that portion living east of Rome. (b) Approximately half or more of the Jews livedoutside Palestine, of which many were descended from proselytes, male and female.” (c)

“However, Judaism’s ethics and morality were incompatible with the hallowed Roman institution ofslavery on which the aristocracy fed, lived and ruled. They feared that Judaism would become thechief religion of the empire. The Roman author, Annaeus Seneca, tutor and confidant of EmperorNero, suggested in a letter to his friend Lucilius (a pseudonym of Lucius Piso) that lighting candleson Sabbaths be prohibited. (d) Seneca is later quoted by St. Augustine in his City of God (e)(although the quotation does not exist in Seneca’s extant writings) as charging that:“the (Sabbath) customs of that most accursed nation have gained such strength that they have been now received in all lands, the conquered have given laws to the conqueror.””“The family headed by Seneca’s friend, Lucius Piso, was confronted with an allied problem morepersonal to it. They were the Calpurnius Pisos, who were descended from statesmen and consuls,and from great poets and historians as well. Gaius and Lucius Calpurnius Piso, leaders of the family,had both married Arria the Younger (from her grandfather’s name, Aristobulus). This made Gaiusand Lucius Piso’s wife the great-granddaughter of Herod the Great.”

“Repeatedly, religious-minded Judaean zealots were staging insurrections against the Herodian rulersof Judaea who were Piso’s wife’s relations. Piso wished to strengthen his wife’s family’s control ofthe Judaeans. The Pisos searched for a solution to the two problems. They found it in the Jewishholy books, which were the foundation both for the rapid spread of the religion and for the zealot’srefusal to be governed by Rome’s puppets. The Pisos mocked, but marveled at, the Jewish belief intheir holy books. Therefore, they felt a new “Jewish” book would be the ideal method to pacify theJudaeans and strengthen their in-laws’ control of the country.”

“About the year, 60 A.D. (C.E.), Lucius Calpurnius Piso composed Ur Marcus, the first version ofthe Gospel of Mark, which no longer exists. He was encouraged by his friend Seneca (f) andassisted by his wife’s kinsman, young Persius the Poet. Nero’s mistress (later his wife) Poppea waspro-Jewish, and Nero opposed the plan. The result was the Pisonian conspiracy to assassinateNero, detailed in the historian Tacitus. But this attempt failed when he aborted the plot. Instead,Nero had Piso and Seneca and their fellow conspirators executed by forcing them to commitsuicide.”

“He exiled Piso’s young son Arrius (spelled “Arius” herein), who appears in Tacitus under severalnames, including “Antonius Natalis.” (g) Nero sent young Piso to Syria as governor. That post alsogave him command of the legions controlling Judaea. His own “history” records his service in Judaeain the year 65 under the name of Gessius Florus, and in 66 with the pseudonym Cestius Gallus.”

“This Arius Calpurnius Piso deliberately provoked the Jewish revolt in 66 so he could destroy theTemple in Jerusalem (h)--for the Jews were unwilling to accept his father’s story and therebybecome pacified by it as it was intended. However, his 12th legion was caught by the zealots in thePass of Beth Horon and almost lost. Nero’s reaction was to exile him instead to Pannonia, tocommand a legion there; and to send Licinius Mucianus to serve in Syria, and Vespasian to Judaeato put down the Jewish revolt.”

“Then in 68 Nero was assassinated by his own slave Epaphroditus (i) --who unknown to his masterwas young Piso’s lackey. Galba became emperor and named Piso’s cousin, Licinianus Piso, (j) ashis intended successor; but Galba in turn was soon overthrown by Otho. Otho was then overthrownby Vitellius, at which point Piso and his friends began to flock together against the latter. The Pisos,Mucianus, and Tiberius Alexander all joined ranks behind Vespasian to seek to overthrow Vitellius.(k) The were joined by Frontinus and Agricola.”

“Arius Calpurnius Piso was still commanding the 7th legion in Pannonia (l) (Austria-Hungary), andVespasian sent him (m) (now appearing in Tacitus with the name Marcus Antonius Primus (n)) southacross the Alps to overthrow Vitellius. Meanwhile, the main body of Vespasian’s legions marchedoverland under Mucianus from the east towards Rome. Piso succeeded in defeating Vitellius’ armyand secured Rome for Vespasian.(o) Mucianus arrived and promptly sent him to Judaea to helpTitus at the siege of Jerusalem. He did so, and in 70 they assaulted the city, then the Temple, burnedit, slaughtered many thousands, sent thousands more to slavery and gladiatorial combat and death.”

“Then, Arius Calpurnius Piso wrote, in sequence, the following:Gospel of Matthew (70-75 C.E.)Present Gospel of Mark (75-80 C.E.)Gospel of Luke (85-90 C.E., with help of Pliny the Younger)In the gospel story he inserted himself by playing the role of not only Jesus, but of all theJosephs, as well. He particularly enjoyed assuming the identity of Joseph. Wishing to create aJewish hero, a savior, in fictional form, he (and his father before him), felt the identity of a secondJoseph secretly, but very aptly, fit them. For their name Piso had the same four letters, rearranged,as the four Hebrew letters (Yud Vov Samech Fey) which in that language spelled the name Joseph.Thus they saw themselves as the new Joseph. That is why so much of the story of Joseph in Egypt issecretly redone and inserted into the gospel story of Jesus.”

According to Albert Pike, Gnosticism was an offshoot of Kabalism, an oral occult tradition, which was adhered to by a minority of the Jews. At some point, which remains uncertain, these occult teachings were reduced to writing, and the Kabalah was born. On page 626 of Morals and Dogma, Pike states, "The Kabalah is the key of all Masonry and the occult sciences; and the Gnostics were born of the Kabalists."

Kabalism was merely a unique version of the ancient mysteries specifically designed to deceive God's ( OT ) chosen people. Unlike the other mysteries, its teachings dealt specifically with Israel, offering occult counter-explanations to the revelations of the prophets, complete with a cleverly disguised occult interpretation of the history of Israel. Moses, for example, rather than being the righteous prophet of God who led the Israelites out of Egypt, was made out to be an occult figure whose purpose was to initiate the Israelites into the enlightened and more advanced teachings of Egypt.

If Kabalism could be viewed as the occult counter-explanation of the Old Testament, Gnosticism, existing as a further development of Kabalism and taking into account Satan's "new problem" posed by the risen Christ, would serve as the main occult counterattack against the New Testament. Thus, Kabalism and Gnosticism combined, composed a type of occult parallel to the Old and New Testaments.

Gnosticism, although originally composed of Jewish occultists, rapidly gained Gentile followers until it soon became predominantly Gentile. As the priesthoods were forced to take on new forms, Gnosticism became a magnet for these occult adepts. Branches of Gnosticism represented the first significant secret societies of the post-resurrection era with various degrees or levels of initiation and the inner circle of initiates worshiping Lucifer.

Gnosticism

A significant amount of space has been devoted to the discussion of Gnosticism in Masonic reference works. Morals and Dogma, for example, has allotted more than forty pages to Gnosticism and its connection with Freemasonry. Albert Pike, the book's author, offers the following explanation of Gnosticism:

"The Gnostics derived their leading doctrines and ideas from Plato and Philo, the Zend-avesta and the Kabalah, and the Sacred books of India and Egypt; and thus introduced into the bosom of Christianity the cosmological and theosophical speculations, which had formed the larger portion of the ancient religions of the Orient, joined to those of the Egyptian, Greek, and Jewish doctrines, which the New-Platonists had equally adopted in the Occident" (Morals and Dogma, 248).

This key bloodline comes down through the most famous Egyptian queen, Cleopatra (60-30BC), who married the most famous Roman Emperor, Julius Caesar, and bore him a son, who became Ptolemy XIV. She also bore twins with Mark Anthony, who has his own connections to this line and its many offshoots; this bloodline also connects to Herod the Great, the "Herod" of the Jesus stories, and continues to the Roman Piso family who, as I explain in The Biggest Secret, wrote the Gospel stories and invented the mythical figure called Jesus!!; the same bloodline includes Constantine the Great, the Roman Emperor who, in 325AD, turned Christianity, based on his ancestors' stories, into the religion we know today, and King Ferdinand of Spain and Queen Isabella of Castile, the sponsors of Christopher Columbus, who instigated the horrific Spanish Inquisition (1478-1834) in which people were tortured and burned at the stake for in any way questioning the basis of the religion their various ancestors had created.

"We jewish people and Church Leaders have known since the beginning of Christianity that it was synthesized by the Roman Piso family for the purpose of maintaining control over the masses and to placate slaves.

Quoting: Sir.Kalin

What a miserable lying little twat you are. For those of you who would like to know more from a biblical point of view.

More than that, the most used version of the Bible was commissioned and sponsored by another strand in the same bloodline, King James 1st of England. Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about! The line of James, according to genealogy sources listed below, can be traced back to 1550 BC and beyond and includes many Egyptian pharaohs, including Rameses II.

The bloodline moved into France and northern Europe through the Franks and Meroveus or Merovee, who gave his name to the Merovingian bloodline, and it continues with the rest of the Merovingian clan like Clovis and the Dagoberts who connect into the elite secret society, the Priory of Sion and the Rennes-le-Chateau "mystery" in Languedoc [Provence], Southern France. Many books have been written recently which claim that the Merovingians are the bloodline of "Jesus"

so the Piso family has direct ties with thecreation of the Jesus myth, Lucius Pisofirst wrote Ur Mark. Constantine Pisomass distributed the Jesus Myth and fundedthis distribution thenalong came King James (Piso bloodline)who gave us the KJV of the Jesus Myth.

Piso connections from start to present day.

So Dan Brown got it wrong.It wasn't Jesus' actual bloodline.It was the bloodline of his creators.

All the historians record Jesus, his death upon the cross, his missing body from the tomb, and those early Christians.

Here is a quote from the Encyclopedia Britannica concerning the testimony of the many independent secular accounts of Jesus of Nazareth: "These independent accounts prove that in ancient times even the opponents of Christianity never doubted the historicity of Jesus, which was disputed for the first time and on inadequate grounds by several authors at the end of the 18th, during the 19th, and at the beginning of the 20th centuries." [link to www.thedevineevidence.com]

Here is a quote from the Encyclopedia Britannica concerning the testimony of the many independent secular accounts of Jesus of Nazareth: "These independent accounts prove that in ancient times even the opponents of Christianity never doubted the historicity of Jesus, which was disputed for the first time and on inadequate grounds by several authors at the end of the 18th, during the 19th, and at the beginning of the 20th centuries." [link to www.thedevineevidence.com]

Quoting: Axx 3326124

wrong

if Jesus' existence was never disputedthen there would be no Judaism today.

It was debunked already. Rome was trying to eliminate Christianity not create it.

Quoting: Axx 3326124

No, you are wrong

not ALL members of the Piso familywent along with this Jesus Psy-Op.

Emperor Nero did not agree with itbecause his wife was Jewish and hehad Lucius Piso and Seneca both commitsuicide over the writing of Ur Marcus.

However after Lucius' death his sonArrius Capernius Piso (better knownas Flavius Josephus) continued withwriting the books his father started.

So not all members of the family agreedand some Christians were torturedby the ones who disagreed with thePsy-Op. Not all Caesars' killedChristians.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20193488

Lucius Piso writes Ur Marcus in 60 ADand proposes it to Emperor Nero.He disapproved of it. So Luciusputs it on the back burner for 5 yrs.In 65 AD Nero finds out that LuciusPiso went ahead and distributed Ur Marcus anyway. Lucius Piso commits suicide on orders from Nero.