He was the second non-WWE TNA guy I found out about (after Joe obviously).

Click to expand...

I've forgotten what was my first TNA match. I know that it was before they went to the six sided ring and it had Russo involved in the storyline with Jim Cornette. The earliest that I can remember is Team 3D vs. British Invasion.

He was the second non-WWE TNA guy I found out about (after Joe obviously).

Click to expand...

I've forgotten what was my first TNA match. I know that it was before they went to the six sided ring and it had Russo involved in the storyline with Jim Cornette. The earliest that I can remember is Team 3D vs. British Invasion.

He was the second non-WWE TNA guy I found out about (after Joe obviously).

Click to expand...

I've forgotten what was my first TNA match. I know that it was before they went to the six sided ring and it had Russo involved in the storyline with Jim Cornette. The earliest that I can remember is Team 3D vs. British Invasion.

I've forgotten what was my first TNA match. I know that it was before they went to the six sided ring and it had Russo involved in the storyline with Jim Cornette. The earliest that I can remember is Team 3D vs. British Invasion.

Click to expand...

This was mine

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

I can't believe we've went through the VKM, Main Event Mafia, Christian Coalition, Immortal/Fortune and now Aces & 8s. TNA sure loves their factions.

Honestly, if you do get the chance to go to a live TNA event, I'd recommend it. I've been to both last years and this years events in Manchester and both of them were very good, even though we had a televised taping this year. The TV tapings sure can burn you out though since you will be watching 3 hours of in-ring action with as little breaks in between.

I can't believe we've went through the VKM, Main Event Mafia, Christian Coalition, Immortal/Fortune and now Aces & 8s. TNA sure loves their factions.

Honestly, if you do get the chance to go to a live TNA event, I'd recommend it. I've been to both last years and this years events in Manchester and both of them were very good, even though we had a televised taping this year. The TV tapings sure can burn you out though since you will be watching 3 hours of in-ring action with as little breaks in between.

I can't believe we've went through the VKM, Main Event Mafia, Christian Coalition, Immortal/Fortune and now Aces & 8s. TNA sure loves their factions.

Honestly, if you do get the chance to go to a live TNA event, I'd recommend it. I've been to both last years and this years events in Manchester and both of them were very good, even though we had a televised taping this year. The TV tapings sure can burn you out though since you will be watching 3 hours of in-ring action with as little breaks in between.

Click to expand...

I want to, but I always forget to ask

Click to expand...

They'll be touring again in January 2014. Every year, they tour around January/February time. I'll find out where they're touring next year for you. I know that Manchester, Nottingham and London are guaranteed dates and this year, they added Glasgow and Dublin I think. The house shows are more thought out compared to the TV tapings but the experience is still the same.

Thanks. If they go Manchester, I'll have to remember. Stupid WWE, never coming here anymore.

On a completely unrelated note, Ultimo Dragon is awesome

Click to expand...

I think that WWE does come to Manchester but it's never televised anymore. They usually make their stops during the Survivor Series Revenge Tour. They usually bring the SmackDown brand over. I don't know if it's the same now. I've heard off those that went to the WWE events and the TNA events that the TNA events are more engaging for the crowd because of the in-ring action while WWE carries the entertainment value. I hope that they bring the cameras over again next year and do more tapings since the crowd blew the roof off this year compared to last year because of it.

A) Strict brand split is in place with each brand having their own 2 Hour weekly show, PPV's and titles. (Apart from Royal Rumble, Wrestlemania, SummerSlam & Survivor Series)

or

B) Fully scrap the brand split and have 3 hour RAW, no Friday show and a Major, Minor, Tag, Cruiserweight & Women's title.

Click to expand...

Do we have to do exactly what is said for each choice? I choose A, but only one main title and one tag title (champions compete on both shows). Then I would do everything in my power to get a TV deal for NXT.

Click to expand...

You could do that I guess. Personally I'd have one Main Title per show still, having the Tag Titles across al brands would be cool. But I wouldn't have just one main title for all brands that'd kind of defeat the purpose of the split.

I would love NXT to be a 3rd brand too. There are rumours that they are pushing for this to happen.

Click to expand...

I mean one main title by just a WWE Title. Smackdown would have the US Title, while Raw would have the IC title. WWE did it, and it didn't defeat the purpose of a brand split.

That would go well with the Thrice in a Lifetime match they have planned.

Click to expand...

I love it, first I was like "meh" but than when everyone learnt the dance (well to the chorus anyway) and this played up town, everyone joined in and danced to it on Friday.

Plus if true he'd get Tons of non wrestling fans wondering what the hell WrestleMania is so thats a +

Click to expand...

It may tap into the South Korean market though but I doubt non-wrestling fans globally will care if he's the host of WrestleMania or performs at WrestleMania. Anything at this stage would beat a Rock/Cena rematch at WM30.

I can't believe that the WWE Championship turns 50 this week and Cena is the champ on the 50th anniversary.

That would go well with the Thrice in a Lifetime match they have planned.

Click to expand...

I love it, first I was like "meh" but than when everyone learnt the dance (well to the chorus anyway) and this played up town, everyone joined in and danced to it on Friday.

Plus if true he'd get Tons of non wrestling fans wondering what the hell WrestleMania is so thats a +

Click to expand...

It may tap into the South Korean market though but I doubt non-wrestling fans globally will care if he's the host of WrestleMania or performs at WrestleMania. Anything at this stage would beat a Rock/Cena rematch at WM30.

I can't believe that the WWE Championship turns 50 this week and Cena is the champ on the 50th anniversary.

Click to expand...

and so he should be, easily the best WWE champion ever and when I think of the title I automatically think of him.

I love it, first I was like "meh" but than when everyone learnt the dance (well to the chorus anyway) and this played up town, everyone joined in and danced to it on Friday.

Plus if true he'd get Tons of non wrestling fans wondering what the hell WrestleMania is so thats a +

Click to expand...

It may tap into the South Korean market though but I doubt non-wrestling fans globally will care if he's the host of WrestleMania or performs at WrestleMania. Anything at this stage would beat a Rock/Cena rematch at WM30.

I can't believe that the WWE Championship turns 50 this week and Cena is the champ on the 50th anniversary.

Click to expand...

and so he should be, easily the best WWE champion ever and when I think of the title I automatically think of him.

I agree with the World Heavyweight Championship though but you could add Dusty Rhodes, Ricky Steamboat, Booker T, DDP and Sting to that list as well.

I wouldn't have mind if Cena was the champion on the 50th anniversary if it wasn't for him being too predictable and lead us to the most predictable WM ME ever. Also, all this talk about him being there part time for the next month by skipping house shows doesn't help his case either.

It may tap into the South Korean market though but I doubt non-wrestling fans globally will care if he's the host of WrestleMania or performs at WrestleMania. Anything at this stage would beat a Rock/Cena rematch at WM30.

I can't believe that the WWE Championship turns 50 this week and Cena is the champ on the 50th anniversary.

Click to expand...

and so he should be, easily the best WWE champion ever and when I think of the title I automatically think of him.

I agree with the World Heavyweight Championship though but you could add Dusty Rhodes, Ricky Steamboat, Booker T, DDP and Sting to that list as well.

I wouldn't have mind if Cena was the champion on the 50th anniversary if it wasn't for him being too predictable and lead us to the most predictable WM ME ever. Also, all this talk about him being there part time for the next month by skipping house shows doesn't help his case either.

Click to expand...

To the highlighted: If you think of those and not John Cena as well, than something is wrong with you. I suppose you have a nice case of Cena-Hate.

To the World Title, I was more implying WWE's version, but if I was to just picture the "Big Gold belt" I would think of Ric Flair.

I agree with the World Heavyweight Championship though but you could add Dusty Rhodes, Ricky Steamboat, Booker T, DDP and Sting to that list as well.

I wouldn't have mind if Cena was the champion on the 50th anniversary if it wasn't for him being too predictable and lead us to the most predictable WM ME ever. Also, all this talk about him being there part time for the next month by skipping house shows doesn't help his case either.

Click to expand...

To the highlighted: If you think of those and not John Cena as well, than something is wrong with you. I suppose you have a nice case of Cena-Hate.

To the World Title, I was more implying WWE's version, but if I was to just picture the "Big Gold belt" I would think of Ric Flair.

Click to expand...

I've never considered Cena to be a true WWE Champion though, even when he was champion before this reign because I know that within a few months, he'll drop the title to the next big draw and then rant about losing the title for a few months before getting a title shot again. Nothing Cena does stands out to me these days compared to back in 2004/2005. Honestly, I can guarantee that somebody like Ryback or Cesaro will become WWE Champion in the upcoming months only to set up Cena to face The Rock or some other legend.

I agree with the World Heavyweight Championship though but you could add Dusty Rhodes, Ricky Steamboat, Booker T, DDP and Sting to that list as well.

I wouldn't have mind if Cena was the champion on the 50th anniversary if it wasn't for him being too predictable and lead us to the most predictable WM ME ever. Also, all this talk about him being there part time for the next month by skipping house shows doesn't help his case either.

Click to expand...

To the highlighted: If you think of those and not John Cena as well, than something is wrong with you. I suppose you have a nice case of Cena-Hate.

To the World Title, I was more implying WWE's version, but if I was to just picture the "Big Gold belt" I would think of Ric Flair.

Click to expand...

I've never considered Cena to be a true WWE Champion though, even when he was champion before this reign because I know that within a few months, he'll drop the title to the next big draw and then rant about losing the title for a few months before getting a title shot again. Nothing Cena does stands out to me these days compared to back in 2004/2005. Honestly, I can guarantee that somebody like Ryback or Cesaro will become WWE Champion in the upcoming months only to set up Cena to face The Rock or some other legend.

Click to expand...

He's been WWE Champ 11 times, I consider him a true WWE Champion and even haters can admit that apart from you, Today's product (and it's been the case since the AE) is the title gets passed back and fourth over and over, So if that is a reason you don't consider him a true WWE Champion than LOL.

It is similar to me saying, that I don't believe Eddie Guerrero is a true WWE Champion, because the only reason people remember his title run is because he died. But that opinion is both disrespectful and "stupid" to people. However that's exactly what you thinking of Cena not being a True WWE Champion is disrespectful and "stupid".He has held it 11 times random, if you don't think of him when you picture the title than your Cena Hate is seriously clouding your judgement, this isn't 2007 anymore.

To the highlighted: If you think of those and not John Cena as well, than something is wrong with you. I suppose you have a nice case of Cena-Hate.

To the World Title, I was more implying WWE's version, but if I was to just picture the "Big Gold belt" I would think of Ric Flair.

Click to expand...

I've never considered Cena to be a true WWE Champion though, even when he was champion before this reign because I know that within a few months, he'll drop the title to the next big draw and then rant about losing the title for a few months before getting a title shot again. Nothing Cena does stands out to me these days compared to back in 2004/2005. Honestly, I can guarantee that somebody like Ryback or Cesaro will become WWE Champion in the upcoming months only to set up Cena to face The Rock or some other legend.

Click to expand...

He's been WWE Champ 11 times, I consider him a true WWE Champion and even haters can admit that apart from you, Today's product (and it's been the case since the AE) is the title gets passed back and fourth over and over, So if that is a reason you don't consider him a true WWE Champion than LOL.

It is similar to me saying, that I don't believe Eddie Guerrero is a true WWE Champion, because the only reason people remember his title run is because he died. But that opinion is both disrespectful and "stupid" to people. However that's exactly what you thinking of Cena not being a True WWE Champion is disrespectful and "stupid".He has held it 11 times random, if you don't think of him when you picture the title than your Cena Hate is seriously clouding your judgement, this isn't 2007 anymore.

Click to expand...

There wasn't anything worth remembering of any of Cena's reigns though and holding the title 11 times in 10 years doesn't cut it for me. Nobody talks about Punk's year long title reign or Hogan's lengthy title reign in the 80s. The amount of times doesn't make them a great champion but for what they're remembered for in their reigns. I find it disrespectful that you don't consider Randy Savage a true WWE Champion though when he has had memorable title matches against Ted DiBiase, Hogan and Ric Flair for the title.

Why are you acting like this is all over me hating on Cena? I just never gotten into any of his title reigns and who he's involved with throughout his title defenses. Cena doesn't have the same legacy as guys like Savage, Warrior or Foley because they did more for the rest of the card and not focus on the main event all of the time. You want the real truth why I hate on Cena don't you? The truth is that he's WWE's biggest cash cow and it's been so long that they have given anybody else a chance to headline a PPV unless he's injured or running off to do a movie for a few months. Instead of allowing Punk to run in the main event with the WWE Championship, he headlined every PPV from WM28-SummerSlam 2012 not as the champion. More fans are getting fed up by how stale and predictable the product is because of Cena.

I've never considered Cena to be a true WWE Champion though, even when he was champion before this reign because I know that within a few months, he'll drop the title to the next big draw and then rant about losing the title for a few months before getting a title shot again. Nothing Cena does stands out to me these days compared to back in 2004/2005. Honestly, I can guarantee that somebody like Ryback or Cesaro will become WWE Champion in the upcoming months only to set up Cena to face The Rock or some other legend.

Click to expand...

He's been WWE Champ 11 times, I consider him a true WWE Champion and even haters can admit that apart from you, Today's product (and it's been the case since the AE) is the title gets passed back and fourth over and over, So if that is a reason you don't consider him a true WWE Champion than LOL.

It is similar to me saying, that I don't believe Eddie Guerrero is a true WWE Champion, because the only reason people remember his title run is because he died. But that opinion is both disrespectful and "stupid" to people. However that's exactly what you thinking of Cena not being a True WWE Champion is disrespectful and "stupid".He has held it 11 times random, if you don't think of him when you picture the title than your Cena Hate is seriously clouding your judgement, this isn't 2007 anymore.

Click to expand...

There wasn't anything worth remembering of any of Cena's reigns though and holding the title 11 times in 10 years doesn't cut it for me. Nobody talks about Punk's year long title reign or Hogan's lengthy title reign in the 80s. The amount of times doesn't make them a great champion but for what they're remembered for in their reigns. I find it disrespectful that you don't consider Randy Savage a true WWE Champion though when he has had memorable title matches against Ted DiBiase, Hogan and Ric Flair for the title.

Why are you acting like this is all over me hating on Cena? I just never gotten into any of his title reigns and who he's involved with throughout his title defenses. Cena doesn't have the same legacy as guys like Savage, Warrior or Foley because they did more for the rest of the card and not focus on the main event all of the time. You want the real truth why I hate on Cena don't you? The truth is that he's WWE's biggest cash cow and it's been so long that they have given anybody else a chance to headline a PPV unless he's injured or running off to do a movie for a few months. Instead of allowing Punk to run in the main event with the WWE Championship, he headlined every PPV from WM28-SummerSlam 2012 not as the champion. More fans are getting fed up by how stale and predictable the product is because of Cena.

Click to expand...

Hogans reign is mentioned all the time, Punks last reign is more memorable than all of Cena's runs, I can admit that, but when you look at the title (especially the spinner title) and you don't think of Cena at all. Than you're lying to me and yourself.

Also lol at you saying Cena doesn't have the same legacy as those guys.

Hulk Hogan, Stone Cold and John Cena are easily the biggest superstars/Professional Wrestlers ever. Despite your lack of interest in his character and "predictable PPV's and outcomes". Don't forget Hogan was a hell of a lot more predictable than Cena and So was Austin, Austin's just wasn't so apparent due to all the T&A and Massive over the top hardcore storylines that could easily mask it, todays product the creative team don't focus on everyone else, just certain people. Cena is always in the Main Event and Always headlining PPV's for a reason, He's the fucking man when you look at WWE today. He has been since for atleast 5 years+.

Plus, to do with Punk, he is not on the level of Cena, Yes I expect a lot of hate for this comment, but fact is Punk is great and he's obviously a better wrestler than Cena ever can be, but Punk will never be as big of a superstar as Cena, Because Cena makes the most money for the company and has a lot of +'s. He's obviously a company man which WWE likes for obvious reasons, His make a wish stuff is off the charts, and love him or hate him, Point out positives the odd time or Point out negatives every match, Cena gets crowd reaction, People will pay to see Cena potentially lose, They will pay tickets just to boo him, and obviously to people who have finally realised Cena is the fucking man and deserves a hell of a lot more respect than he gets, People will pay to see him, cheer him and see him win.

From what I can tell, you're bitter about Cena always being the focus, wake up and realise random. He is always the focus for a reason. He is the FUCKING MAN! and will be to the day he becomes Semi- Active or Retires and passes on the torch to another "Hogan", or another "Austin" or finally, another "Cena".

He's been WWE Champ 11 times, I consider him a true WWE Champion and even haters can admit that apart from you, Today's product (and it's been the case since the AE) is the title gets passed back and fourth over and over, So if that is a reason you don't consider him a true WWE Champion than LOL.

It is similar to me saying, that I don't believe Eddie Guerrero is a true WWE Champion, because the only reason people remember his title run is because he died. But that opinion is both disrespectful and "stupid" to people. However that's exactly what you thinking of Cena not being a True WWE Champion is disrespectful and "stupid".He has held it 11 times random, if you don't think of him when you picture the title than your Cena Hate is seriously clouding your judgement, this isn't 2007 anymore.

Click to expand...

There wasn't anything worth remembering of any of Cena's reigns though and holding the title 11 times in 10 years doesn't cut it for me. Nobody talks about Punk's year long title reign or Hogan's lengthy title reign in the 80s. The amount of times doesn't make them a great champion but for what they're remembered for in their reigns. I find it disrespectful that you don't consider Randy Savage a true WWE Champion though when he has had memorable title matches against Ted DiBiase, Hogan and Ric Flair for the title.

Why are you acting like this is all over me hating on Cena? I just never gotten into any of his title reigns and who he's involved with throughout his title defenses. Cena doesn't have the same legacy as guys like Savage, Warrior or Foley because they did more for the rest of the card and not focus on the main event all of the time. You want the real truth why I hate on Cena don't you? The truth is that he's WWE's biggest cash cow and it's been so long that they have given anybody else a chance to headline a PPV unless he's injured or running off to do a movie for a few months. Instead of allowing Punk to run in the main event with the WWE Championship, he headlined every PPV from WM28-SummerSlam 2012 not as the champion. More fans are getting fed up by how stale and predictable the product is because of Cena.

Click to expand...

Hogans reign is mentioned all the time, Punks last reign is more memorable than all of Cena's runs, I can admit that, but when you look at the title (especially the spinner title) and you don't think of Cena at all. Than you're lying to me and yourself.

Also lol at you saying Cena doesn't have the same legacy as those guys.

Hulk Hogan, Stone Cold and John Cena are easily the biggest superstars/Professional Wrestlers ever. Despite your lack of interest in his character and "predictable PPV's and outcomes". Don't forget Hogan was a hell of a lot more predictable than Cena and So was Austin, Austin's just wasn't so apparent due to all the T&A and Massive over the top hardcore storylines that could easily mask it, todays product the creative team don't focus on everyone else, just certain people. Cena is always in the Main Event and Always headlining PPV's for a reason, He's the fucking man when you look at WWE today. He has been since for atleast 5 years+.

Plus, to do with Punk, he is not on the level of Cena, Yes I expect a lot of hate for this comment, but fact is Punk is great and he's obviously a better wrestler than Cena ever can be, but Punk will never be as big of a superstar as Cena, Because Cena makes the most money for the company and has a lot of +'s. He's obviously a company man which WWE likes for obvious reasons, His make a wish stuff is off the charts, and love him or hate him, Point out positives the odd time or Point out negatives every match, Cena gets crowd reaction, People will pay to see Cena potentially lose, They will pay tickets just to boo him, and obviously to people who have finally realised Cena is the fucking man and deserves a hell of a lot more respect than he gets, People will pay to see him, cheer him and see him win.

From what I can tell, you're bitter about Cena always being the focus, wake up and realise random. He is always the focus for a reason. He is the FUCKING MAN! and will be to the day he becomes Semi- Active or Retires and passes on the torch to another "Hogan", or another "Austin" or finally, another "Cena".

Click to expand...

The difference between Austin and Cena is that there were more top draws alongside him. You had Triple H, Shawn Michaels, Mick Foley, The Undertaker, Kane & The Rock. Cena only has CM Punk as the next top draw due to merchandise sales while the rest are being back burnered out of the top spot. The only thing I like about Cena is his work ethic and his charity work within the WWE but apart from that, he has done more harm for the company than he has done good. Punk cannot be the top draw with Cena around because you've already told me why and that is because he makes the most money for the company. So you're saying that because he makes the most money that he should main event week in and week out? Fans will pay for tickets just to see him appear on the show regardless of where he is on the card. To me, the WWE Championship should remain in the main event while everything else should be before the title match on the card, regardless of them being the top draw on the card or not.

I hate Cena for the same reasons I hate Hogan and I've already explained that to you already and that is predictability and the way they headline PPVs because they make the WWE the most money because how marketable their characters are. Come back to me in 5 years when Cena decides to retire and they try their best to market off the next big thing because it would be like when Hogan left the WWE in 1993.

That's pretty cool.
I can't believe Hogan has held it longer than Backlund in total.

Click to expand...

Bob Backlund has the longest title streak overall though but Hogan had title reigns ranging from 3 months to 9 months every time he held it past his first 4 1/2 year reign spanning from 1984-1988. I think Backlund held the title for 2 days (this includes the day he lost the title against Diesel a day later) and had held it for around 5 1/2 years in his first title reign.

It's funny that I'm watching Hogan's KOTR 1993 match against Yokozuna now. I think Bret's match against Perfect is just as good as their SummerSlam 90 meeting.

That's pretty cool.
I can't believe Hogan has held it longer than Backlund in total.

Click to expand...

Bob Backlund has the longest title streak overall though but Hogan had title reigns ranging from 3 months to 9 months every time he held it past his first 4 1/2 year reign spanning from 1984-1988. I think Backlund held the title for 2 days (this includes the day he lost the title against Diesel a day later) and had held it for around 5 1/2 years in his first title reign.

It's funny that I'm watching Hogan's KOTR 1993 match against Yokozuna now. I think Bret's match against Perfect is just as good as their SummerSlam 90 meeting.

Click to expand...

Yeah that Hogan vs Yokozuna match just felt weird the way Hogan lost and knowing at the time that was his final match with them. I like that Bret Hart vs Mr. Perfect match more but the SS match was on a bigger event so it gets more attention due to it. Both matches though were great.

That's pretty cool.
I can't believe Hogan has held it longer than Backlund in total.

Click to expand...

Bob Backlund has the longest title streak overall though but Hogan had title reigns ranging from 3 months to 9 months every time he held it past his first 4 1/2 year reign spanning from 1984-1988. I think Backlund held the title for 2 days (this includes the day he lost the title against Diesel a day later) and had held it for around 5 1/2 years in his first title reign.

It's funny that I'm watching Hogan's KOTR 1993 match against Yokozuna now. I think Bret's match against Perfect is just as good as their SummerSlam 90 meeting.

Click to expand...

Yeah that Hogan vs Yokozuna match just felt weird the way Hogan lost and knowing at the time that was his final match with them. I like that Bret Hart vs Mr. Perfect match more but the SS match was on a bigger event so it gets more attention due to it. Both matches though were great.

Click to expand...

Agreed, both bouts were pure class of technical in-ring ability and every time the pair face off, they bring the best out of each other. KOTR 1993 is a pretty good PPV with only HBK/Crush being the only match on the card where I felt could have done a bit better. I'm currently watching the KOTR final match between Bam Bam in Bret Hart and once the PPVs over, I'll move straight onto SummerSlam '93.

The finish in the Hogan/Yokozuna match was a bit dubious as well with the mysterious cameraman blinding Hogan but I guess that's the only way to get Hogan drop the title before he heads off to WCW.

Speaking of King of the Ring, what was your favorite KOTR match? Mine has to be Mr. Perfect vs. Bret Hart at KOTR 93 so far.

Click to expand...

yeah Jerry Lawler was very funny back then and Bam Bam Bigelow was very great for his size and even kept up with Bret.

I'd say Bret vs Perfect was my favorite match as well.

Click to expand...

I can't wait to see what happened at SummerSlam 93 between both Bret & Lawler now. it's all kicked off between Perfect & HBK/Diesel backstage after their match. Now it's X-Pac's debut match against IRS.

I've been watching Mr. Perfect matches all day ... How the HELL did he not get a WWE Title Reign!

Click to expand...

I don't know but he was one of the greats that never had a shot at the top and became the WWE Champion. All you need to do is see both of his encounters against Bret at SummerSlam 91 and King of the Ring 93 to see how great he was in the ring.

I've been watching Mr. Perfect matches all day ... How the HELL did he not get a WWE Title Reign!

Click to expand...

I don't know but he was one of the greats that never had a shot at the top and became the WWE Champion. All you need to do is see both of his encounters against Bret at SummerSlam 91 and King of the Ring 93 to see how great he was in the ring.

Click to expand...

He was just pure brilliance, it's an injustice that he never got the title and people like Ultimate Warrior did. I get why Warrior was Champion with his look and gimmick. But it just feels wrong you know?

I've been watching Mr. Perfect matches all day ... How the HELL did he not get a WWE Title Reign!

Click to expand...

I don't know but he was one of the greats that never had a shot at the top and became the WWE Champion. All you need to do is see both of his encounters against Bret at SummerSlam 91 and King of the Ring 93 to see how great he was in the ring.

Click to expand...

He was just pure brilliance, it's an injustice that he never got the title and people like Ultimate Warrior did. I get why Warrior was Championship with his look and gimmick. But it just feels wrong you know?

Plus those two matches ....

Click to expand...

I think Daniel Bryan had it right a few years ago about Vince having a hard on for big guys with muscle.

I think I've found the reason I hate Cena, Hogan, Warrior so much. It's because people look back and say why wasn't (insert name) champion. Like I have just done. I wonder what people will be on that list in the future years due to Cena's dominance.

I think I've found the reason I hate Cena, Hogan, Warrior so much. It's because people look back and say why wasn't (insert name) champion. Like I have just done. I wonder what people will be on that list in the future years due to Cena's dominance.

Click to expand...

I find it funny when the current breed of fans leap to their defense because they make the most money and has the looks to boot. What's funny is that guys like Warrior, Hogan and Cena were better in the ring before they made it into the main event and all of a sudden it's like "I'm the face of the WWE now. Nothing else matters as long as I have the paycheck and the fans kissing my ass" when they reach the top. Looking back now, all we can say is that they never gave those guys a chance to make it to the top and it seems like Vince is more about the entertainment value and not on the wrestling value these days.

They have no excuse in this era to not give the underrated/more talented guys get involved in the main event scene. Back in the day they only had a few televised shows and 4-5 PPV's per year. So I kind of understood the reasoning. But with RAW, SD, NXT, ME, SLAM & 12+ PPVs ... There is no excuse for the lack of time to get the newer stars involved.