Mullen v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

AND NOW, this 8th day of April 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, for Transfer, filed on February 7, 2014 (ECF 8), Plaintiff's response thereto, filed on February 21, 2014 (ECF 9), and Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion, filed on February 28, 2014(ECF 10), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED and Defendant's ...

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.