Mary Cheney says sister is 'dead wrong' on same-sex marriage

There are 170 comments on the
KCRA-TV Sacramento
story from Sep 1, 2013, titled Mary Cheney says sister is 'dead wrong' on same-sex marriage.
In it, KCRA-TV Sacramento reports that:

Once you're logged in, at the top of each article, video or slideshow you will see a list of your Facebook friends who recently visited Choose to share stories you'e read with your friends or turn sharing OFF to keep your reading experience anonymous .

You know, Vice President Cheney came out FOR equal marriage rights for LGBT Americans LONG BEFORE The Obamaniac ever did, which did VERY RELUCTANTLY.IMPEACH THIS BUM ! THROW STUMBLEBUM JOE IN THERE ! NEXT !

SOMETIMES Republicans support equality when the negative aspects of inequality hits them over the head, but apparently some would still rather sell out to the baser parts of their "party" instead of supporting family members. No wonder they're so screwed up.

And still no legitimate governmental interest sufficient for denial of equal protections of the law as required by the constitution.But that is because there are none.

WRONG !

The relevant portion of the 14th Amendment is: " No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

It does NOT say: "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws except if there is a legitimate government interest."

<quoted text>WRONG !The relevant portion of the 14th Amendment is: " No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."It does NOT say: "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws except if there is a legitimate government interest."You just make this stuff up as you go along, huh ?

I didn't make anything up. I simply read the words: "without due process of law."

I also know, whether or not you or I like it or agree, you can't say anything you like anywhere you like. Other restrictions have been found to be constitutional, while many others have not passed that test.

<quoted text>I didn't make anything up. I simply read the words: "without due process of law."I also know, whether or not you or I like it or agree, you can't say anything you like anywhere you like. Other restrictions have been found to be constitutional, while many others have not passed that test.

<quoted text>WRONG !The relevant portion of the 14th Amendment is: " No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."It does NOT say: "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws except if there is a legitimate government interest."You just make this stuff up as you go along, huh ?

Says the one who insists there is no right to vote in the Constitution!

Liz Cheney said last week she is "not pro-gay marriage" and believes the issues of marriage should be left up to voters in their respective states, not to judges or legislators. Problem is SCOTUS has ruled that such rights CAN NOT be put to a vote.

ARTICLE VI

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

AMENDMENT IXThe enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Now about voting on civil rights:SCOTUS Majority opinion:

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette 1943

"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections."

<quoted text>Says the one who insists there is no right to vote in the Constitution!LMAO!

oddly enough, the right to vote is not explicitly written out in the constitution (as many of our rights are not) the first mention of the right to vote is in the amendment describing why that right cannot be abrogated...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.