The Psychology of Terrorism: Why Normal People Become Deluded Murderers

Over the last three weeks, since the horrific terrorist attacks in Paris—and now the shootings in St. Bernardino, which seem to be linked to terrorism—many of us have been seeking explanations. What makes it possible for human beings to behave with such cold brutality and violence? It’s much too simplistic to ascribe terrorist behavior to some innate “evil” or to say that they are insane. Instead, it’s important to look at the psychological factors that give rise to terrorism.

In my view, the most salient fact about the terrorists who staged the attacks in Paris—and which applies to terrorists generally—is that they are people who have had problems with integration and identity and who have felt alienated and disenfranchised. The life stories of the Paris terrorists that have been released show a general profile of people who have been drifters, with no sense of meaning or purpose in their lives; they are people who have not managed to find a place for themselves in society. They are often people who are caught between two cultures—their own immigrant culture and that of the culture they live in—and don’t feel at home in either. They are typically people who have spent their adolescent years with a strong sense of existential instability, disorientation, and confusion.

Such people are especially vulnerable to the ideology of manipulative religious demagogues because they crave for the sense of certainty and purpose which fundamentalist religion provides. Religious belief systems are appealing to them because they seem to make complete sense of the world. They provide a narrative that gives everything a place, including the person who believes it. Religious belief systems provide an explanation for every event and a motive for every action. For people who suffer from existential instability, this certainty is intoxicating.

But it’s equally important that fundamentalist religions provide a strong sense of belonging, which these people have always lacked. The groups’ ideology and their common goals bind them together, along with their certainty that they possess the truth—that out of all the others, it is only their interpretation of reality which is correct.

Such people allow themselves to become psychopaths. They switch off their empathy and compassion toward other humans outside their own group. The conceptual framework of their ideology turns other people into abstract entities, with whom they have no emotional connection. They perceive the world through the conceptual apparatus of their ideology, rather than through direct experience. Their intoxicating sense of belonging, identity, and certainty they possess as members of their group enables them to disconnect themselves from all other groups, and all other people.

The Instability and Disorientation of Terrorists

In my view, it is also significant that most people who engage in terrorism tend to be young—seldom over the age of 30—and male.

Adolescence and early adulthood are a tough phase of life. It is a time when we develop a sense of being autonomous. We become separate individuals, living in our own mental space. This creates a sense of vulnerability and insecurity. Our sense of separateness can create anxiety and feelings of isolation. This is why adolescents are so sensitive to peer pressure and so keen to “fit in” and belong and so follow fashions or rock bands or join sub-cultural groups. They crave for acceptance and belonging to escape their isolation.

And this feeling of isolation and vulnerability seems to be especially high in males. Females don’t seem to experience “ego-separateness” to the same degree. It’s unclear whether this is due to environmental factors or innate psychological and biological ones, but females seem to be generally more relational than males, finding it easier to make connections and find emotional support.

This is one of the reasons why the suicide rate is so high in young men under the age of 25—because of their sense of isolation, and because they have difficulty in finding emotional support and sharing their problems with others. It’s also why the vast majority of gang members are young males, since gangs provide a strong sense of belonging and identity.

And this also applies to terrorists. The terrorist mentality can be seen as a pathology—a form of psychopathy—rooted in a deep sense of existential anxiety and disorientation, which is especially acute during adolescence and early adulthood.

Question: The psychology of terrorism is controversial. What are your thoughts on the subject?

A great post. I well remember my teens in the 60’s when we were going to change the world. It doesn’t take much at that age for rage to build up about unfairness in the world. I was lucky to live in a time and place that gave me the opportunity to learn, get a job and so on. If it had been another place and another time?

Utter fantasy. If there really was a ‘New World Order’ I’m sure they could make up a reason to invade a nation quite easily without murdering thousands of their own citizens, government officials and emergency service personnel.

Unfortunately, the ghetto-like areas their people have created enable such indoctrination. Their communities largely refuse to integrate after choosing to travel to western nations to enjoy the comfort and safety provided. These areas then obviously become the ideal places for radical Imams to recruit members to their cause.

If we want to see the end of terrorism, we need to team up with ‘their people’. The vast majority of them who are not radical and just want to live and let live. They hate it just as much and even more when things like this happen because now they also have to live with being ostracized for something they neither condone nor were responsible for.

Only together can we work to expose the radical elements in the community and live peacefully without one looking down on the other.

Religion is the problem, it is the root of all evil acts like this – just sayin – if you get rid of religion the problems will be solved. Almost all examples of terrorism are rooted or tied to the terrorists religious beliefs or a version/misinterpretation of those beliefs.

An innocent thing such as a child’s drawing pencil can be used to poke someone’s eye out. Or a soft pillow used to smother someone. In the hands of those who wish harm, everything is a weapon.

Even if removing religion from the equation sounds like a good idea, it probably isn’t. Something else might take it’s place and there’s no guarantee what that’ll be like.

In my opinion, religion was the reason most people started to have a moral compass in the first place. This is because most religions fundamentally teach people to be good and do good. When those in charge use it to further their own agendas, we end up with nasty things like terrorism. Those people will always be around.