Wednesday, May 28, 2014

The Coming One World Government

In 1940 the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace published “The New World Order” which included ideas about a World Federation with special plans for world order to be implemented upon ending the second world war. On June 28, 1945, six weeks before the atomic ending of WWII, 33rd president and 33rd degree Free Mason Harry Truman endorsed world government saying, “It will be just as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the World as it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States.” Then on October 24, 1945 the United Nations Charter became effective and the fledgling world governmental body was established.

“Once again the elite claimed that only global governance could save humanity from certain destruction and this time the elite would succeed in setting up their world body. In April 1945 … the United Nations was founded by the victors of World War II. The United Nations complex was then built in New York City on land donated by John D. Rockefeller.Shortly after the elite established the United Nations as their base in the United States, the newly formed World Council quickly began work on the next phase in their plan: the incremental formation of continental super-states. The first step in their trilateral plan was the creation of the European Union. Unifying Europe had been tried many times and was extremely unpopular. Where Napoleon and Hitler had failed to accomplish their goals using force, the globalists would succeed using stealth.” -Alex Jones, “Endgame” DVD

“World War II facilitated the American acceptance of a global ‘peacekeeping" institution - the United Nations. After the U.S. had rejected the first attempt to create such an institution in the League of Nations, the Illuminati decided to create an arm of the Rothschild funded Round Table groups which could help influence western society towards the embracement of globalism.” -Fritz Springmeier, “Bloodlines of the Illuminati”

In 1948 George Orwell wrote 1984, another quasi-fiction novel about the big brother control-grid surveillance societies to come. Orwell said, “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.” On February 7th, 1950 FDR’s financial advisor, international banker James Paul Warburg stated before the United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee that "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” Two days later the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduced Senate Concurrent Resolution 66 stating that the United Nations Charter “should be changed to provide a true world government constitution.” In 1952, globalist and Committee of 300 member Bertrand Russell wrote “The Impact of Science on Society.” Russell, like Wells, wrote extensively about world government and the scientific dictatorships of the future:

“There is, it must be confessed, a psychological difficulty about a single world government. The chief source of social cohesion in the past, I repeat, has been war: the passions that inspire a feeling of unity are hate and fear. These depend upon the existence of an enemy, actual or potential. It seems to me that a world government could only be kept in being by force, not by the spontaneous loyalty that now inspires a nation at war.” -Bertrand Russell, “The Impact of Science on Society” (36)

“It is possible nowadays for a government to be very much more oppressive than any government could be before there was scientific technique. Propaganda makes persuasion easier for the government; public ownership of halls and paper makes counter-propaganda more difficult; and the effectiveness of modern armaments makes popular risings impossible. No revolution can succeed in a modern country unless it has the support of at least a considerable section of the armed forces. But the armed forces can be kept loyal by being given a higher standard of life than that of the average worker, and this is made easier by every step in the degradation of ordinary labour. Thus the very evils of the system help to give it stability. Apart from external pressure, there is no reason why such a regime should not last for a very long time." -Bertrand Russell, “The Impact of Science on Society” (61)

"A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government ... unless there is a world government which secures universal birth control, there must from time to time be great wars, in which the penalty of defeat is widespread death by starvation ... Unless, at some stage, one power or group of powers emerges victorious and proceeds to establish a single government of the world with a monopoly of armed forces, it is clear that the level of civilization must decline until scientific warfare becomes impossible - that is until science is extinct." -Bertrand Russell, “The Impact of Science on Society” (117)

Shortly after Russell’s book, fellow Committee of 300 member Aldous Huxley wrote “Brave New World” about a future pharmacological scientific dictatorship in which the drugged citizens are described as “smiling depressives that love their servitude.” Aldous Huxley’s grandfather T.H. Huxley was another Committee of 300 member known as “Darwin’s Bulldog” because he rigorously defended evolution and advocated scientism. H.G. Wells knew both Huxley’s and considered T.H. to be his mentor. In 1959, Aldous Huxley gave one of his last public speeches called “The Final Revolution” at UC medical school, where he stated: “There will be in the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorships without tears, so to speak. Producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel – by propaganda, brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods; and this seems to be the final revolution.”

“The older dictators fell because they could never supply their subjects with enough bread, enough circuses, enough miracles, and mysteries. Under a scientific dictatorship, education will really work…most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown.” -Aldous Huxley, “Brave New World Revisited”

In his 1962 publication, “The Future of Federalism” bloodline governor of New York and CFR member, Nelson Rockefeller, promoted the New World order: “The nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks … These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order … Sooner perhaps than we may realize … there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world.” Years later on July 26, 1968 campaigning for the presidency, Nelson Rockefeller told the Associated Press that “as president, he would work toward the creation of a new world order.”

Bloodline president and CFR member Richard Nixon was quoted in the October 1967 Foreign Affairs stating: "The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.”

In 1969 the first black Congressman from New York, Adam Clayton Powell Jr., blew the whistle on the David Frost Show regarding the secret government. He said on the show that he would probably be killed for going public with everything, and sure enough died suspiciously shortly thereafter.

Zbigneiw Brzezinski is a former U.S. National Security Advisor, Trilateral Commission co-founder, member of the CFR, Club of Rome, and Committee of 300. He is a descendant of the Polish Black Nobility (Old World Order) and associate of Henry Kissinger. In his 1970 book entitled “The Technetronic Era,” Brzezinski envisioned the globalists’ coming dictatorial control-grid: “It will soon be possible to assert almost continuous control over every citizen and to maintain up-to-date files, containing even the most personal details about health and personal behavior of every citizen in addition to the more customary data. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. Power will gravitate into the hands of those who control information. Our existing institutions will be supplanted by pre-crisis management institutions, the task of which will be to identify in advance likely social crises and to develop programs to cope with them. This will encourage tendencies through the next several decades toward a Technotronic Era, a Dictatorship leaving even less room for political procedures as we know them. Finally, looking ahead to the end of the century, the possibility of biochemical mind control and genetic tinkering with man, including beings which will function like men and reason like them as well, could give rise to some difficult questions.”

“Brzezinski is the author of a book that should have been read by every American interested in the future of this country. Entitled ‘The Technotronic Era,’ it was commissioned by the Club of Rome. The book is an open announcement of the manner and methods to be used to control the United States in the future … Brzezinski, speaking for the Committee of 300 said the United States was moving ‘into an era unlike any of its predecessors; we were moving toward a technotronic era that could easily become a dictatorship … Brzezinski went on to say that our society ‘is now in an information revolution based on amusement focus, spectator spectacles (saturation coverage by television of sporting events) which provide an opiate for an increasingly purposeless mass.’ Was Brzezinski another seer and a prophet? Could he see into the future? The answer is NO; what he wrote in his book was simply copied from the Committee of 300's blueprint given to the Club of Rome for execution." -John Coleman, “Conspirators Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300”

In the April 1974 issue of the (CFR) Council on Foreign Relations’ journal, “Foreign Affairs,” member Richard N. Gardner wrote: “The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty', eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”

In October 1975 during an address before the United Nations General Assembly, Henry Kissinger said, "My country's history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order.”

Later in October, the 24th, 1975, the World Affairs Council of Philadelphia issued the “Declaration of Interdependence” signed by 125 members of the House and Senate it read, “When in the course of history the threat of extinction confronts mankind, it is necessary for the people of the United States to declare their interdependence with the people of all nations and to embrace those principles and build those institutions which will enable mankind to survive and civilization to flourish … two centuries ago our forefathers brought forth a new nation; now we must join with others to bring forth a new world order.”

Also in 1975 Richard A. Falk wrote a book called “On the Creation of a Just World Order.” In one section of the book called “Toward the New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions,” Falk wrote, "The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species."

Another whistle-blowing Congressman was Larry P. McDonald, who was then killed onboard a plane suspiciously shot down by soviets. In 1976 he said, “The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."

"There exists a shadowy Government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.” -Senator, Daniel K. Inouye, 1977

"Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order." -Mikhail Gorbachev, United Nations address, December, 1988

"We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt's and Winston Churchill's vision for peace for the post-war period." -Richard Gephardt, Wall Street Journal, September, 1990

“The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity to move toward a historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times; a New World Order can emerge.” -President George Bush, Congressional speech, September 11, 1990

"If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging New World Order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long." -President George Bush, January 1991

"But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush's mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council."-A. M. Rosenthal, New York Times, January, 1991

"I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a 'new world order' based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court." -George McGovern, New York Times, February, 1991

“What is at stake is more than one small country. It is a big idea, a New World Order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve universal aspirations of mankind— peace and security, freedom and the rule of law. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective, a new world order, can emerge. Now we can see a new world coming into being, a world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order.” -President George Bush, State of the Union Address, September 11, 1991

"George Bush has been surrounding himself with people who believe in one-world government. They believe that the Soviet system and the American system are converging. The vehicle to bring this about is the United Nations, the majority of whose 166 member states are socialist, atheist, and anti-American." -U.S. Ambassador David Funderburk, 1991

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all.” -Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, Time Magazine, July 20th, 1992

"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance." -George Bush, 1992

"The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth - in Morocco - to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund." -part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in the New York Times, April 1994

"[The New World Order] cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change its perceptions." -Henry Kissinger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel, April 19th 1994

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” -David Rockefeller at a UN Ambassadors’ dinner, Sept. 23rd, 1994

"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." -Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs July/August 1995

"To achieve One World Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, their loyalty to family traditions and national identification." -Brock Chisholm, while director of UN (WHO) World Health Organization

In 1998, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote another book called “The Grand Chessboard,” in which he compared the elite control of the world to a game of chess and accurately “predicted” Afghani terror attacks and the rise of the American police state. Alex Jones extrapolates in “911 Descent into Tyranny”: “For decades going back to Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski, the National Security Advisor, the New World Order overlords had been breeding and creating these terrorists organizations, funding them, and training them to attack America. Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller and other luminaries of the global system, actually bragged in his 1998 book The Grand Chessboard, of how America would be attacked by Afghan terrorists. A war for global government would then take place in Central Asia that would be used as a reason to roll out national ID cards and a global police state here in the United States. According to Brzezinski’s book, everything that is happening now was planned decades ago. Brzezinski’s book continues to explain how America must survive by following the basic rules of empire and how outside enemies are needed to mobilize the population behind the imperium’s hegemony.”

Just three days after the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon and WorldTradeCenter, CFR member Gary Hart said on C-Span, “There is a chance for the president of the United States to use this disaster to carry out a phrase his father used…and that is a New World Order.”

In his 2002 Memoirs, David Rockefeller openly admitted conspiring with other globalists toward a one-world order: "Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure---one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

Pope John Paul II stated at the World Day of Peace Homily on Jan. 1st, 2004 that, "People are becoming more and more aware of the need for a new international order.”

With the success of Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” movie (which should be called “Convenient Half-Truths”) and a U.N. panel’s worth of poor science from the IPCC, the globalists are hoping to convince us that a world carbon-tax will save us from global warming. In 2007 British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said, “A New World Order is required to deal with the climate change crisis.” And in a book by Al Gore called “Earth in Balance,” he prophesizes a coming Global Marshall Plan to “help” the Earth and its people: “We are close to a time when all of humankind will envision a global agenda that encompasses a kind of Global Marshall Plan to address the causes of poverty and suffering and environmental destruction all over the Earth.”

19
comments:

The dates for this wondrous Beast to be born keep slipping. Reality is turning out to be less compliant with these "best laid plans" than anticipated. One of the reasons for this is the staggering incompetence of the institutions and players in these cabals. The transparent farces that virtually all UN "Commissions" etc. have become, and the revelations of shoddy and fiddled 'science' being touted as justifications for greater power centralization, are gnawing at the supports for the Grand Edifice.

And here's a little wild card for you. What if there existed a power source, readily and inexpensively deployable everywhere in the world, which was pollution and waste-free, and which enriched and empowered every jurisdiction, large or small that utilized it?

If my hopes and expectations come to fruition, a small project in NJ will unveil a product called the FocusFusion.org generator within less than 5 years which will be able to provide power at 1/20 of current best costs. This will undercut and deflate EVERY economic and environmental justification the NWOers are deploying to aggrandize themselves and their imagined Global Governance bodies. Who will need or want them?

I totally agree with your analysis in the first paragraph. As for free/sustainable energy technology of the kind you mentioned, it would be both a great benefit to humanity and a great blow to the oil oligarchs. God speed with your project; it sounds like a venture well worth your time, and much needed and appreciated. Peace

Not free, just very, very economical. The bypassing of very lossy stages of energy conversion (steam turbines, in particular) is a great part of it. Another is the negligible fuel costs -- about $2 per megawatt-year. Divide that by 1000 x 365 x 24 to get kwh fuel costs, if you can be bothered! :) Labor costs are much higher, about 0.1¢/kwh. ;( ;)

I don't have a problem with a new world order. Isn't that what Jesus is supposed to establish on his return? No. there's no problem with world peace and goodwill towards all men. The "problem" stems from the fact that mankind still has not been able to establish a perfect form of government that will treat all people equally. In spite of limits on gov't set by our own Constitution, they still manage to find lawyer-speak, backed by a stacked Supreme Court, that over-rides the wording AND intent of the Founders. Judicial Review of the Constitution is a power usurped by the Supreme Court. All powers of the fed gov't are listed in the Constitution, but the power of judicial review of the Constitution is not in there, not given to any of the three branches. Hence, the power of judicial review belongs to The People. The new world order will not protect the God given rights of man. It will continue to find ways to usurp the power of the people. -A. Sprout

The "problem" stems from the fact that mankind still has not been able to establish a perfect form of government that will treat all people equally.

All governments do treat us equally inferior. They all force us to pay taxes and violently come take them if we don't pay willingly. There will never be a "perfect form of government" because "Govern" means "Control," and in a perfect society people are FREE and autonomous, not controlled by some utopian bureaucracy.

Soon to come - Random Ordered Nation - Not a Government, but a system of legitimate command. You can't stop a nation that doesn't exist, except in the minds of its inhabitants. We are them, you are us. Watch for it.

The NWO is infact a sensible approach if u ask me.. It kinda fulfils what i only thought to be a fantasy while growing up.. I imagined a single govt.. A world govt.. A single president for all countries,nations and states of the earth.. To unite them and ofcourse if sthn like that is in place, peace will sure exist for countries under d same govt and with their armies under dat same govt cant go to war with each other.. One Govt for One world will solve alot of problems and yes, people tend to come together in times of crisis too.. So i believe one will propel them to unite.. Keep it up

So you have a fantasy that the world is dominated and controlled by one centralized agency that governs everyone on Earth? It's true that this would end wars between "countries" and "nations" but it would not result in peace because the new dichotomy formed would be the world government and its agents vs. everyone else. Voluntarism / Agorism / Anarchism are the only philosophically and morally sound forms of governance. Your dream sounds just like the fake world peace brought by the anti-christ's world government talked about in the Bible.

I agree with you Eric, that philosophy is an important center for our efforts. From our existential philosophy, our understanding of origins and the purpose of life, we gain our aesthetics values: what is beautiful, good, wanted, necessary and there opposites. Out of these values we try to shape our lives, relate to our environment, and ultimately produce our life's work and it's consequences. But I am increasingly concerned about how differing moral values within the truth movement, or even just different moral priorities, can be a source of division among us. We are a movement of moral warriors, but this identity may have some negative consequences.

I have been very confrontational at times, and my confrontations have not helped to produce unity with others in the movement. Reflectively, I think that if we are to maintian unity, the principles of anarchism and voluntarism need to be matured within us. We must find unity in our diversity, work to form understandings and maintain alliance.

Part of our work against the evil of the new world order and the psychopathic dictatorship of humanity paradoxically depends upon us maturing out of the good /evil polarity that we have been brainwashed to accept. All wars are "just".

Moral differences, even slight ones, can divide us, like a myriad protestant churches arguing over inconsequentialities. Laozi, in Cleary's translation wrote, "Honorable acts can oppress people." I have been thinking about this phrase so much. For anarchism to work in practice, and for the truth movement to grow in strength, the skills of cooperation need to be developed. We must learn when to be moral warriors and when to make little of moral differences.

I believe that the biblical tale of 'the tower of Bable' is a parable that is parallel to current NWO efforts. Trying to build a structure that would take them to a God-like level.... I beckon the force that divided that project to do its work on these controlling systems that are steadily creeping up around us daily in life and in this world wide web...

A NWO~OWG is just what this world needs right now ... the problem though is that it seems most likely that it would consist of selfish psychopaths, basically the types of elites that are running things right now.

Until humanity as a whole begins to further "wake up" to the Spiritual (=) aspect that actually unites humanity, the essence of the Basic Equation of Truth, the BET as (+=-), we will be forced to suffer the will and desires of those who consider themselves the "superior" (+) that will rule over those they see as the (-)s ... Dualism (+/-) and it's polarities of dichotomy and conflict.

The weakness of the NWO is that it's continuance depends on increasingly complex technologies and systems of oppression. Paradoxically, the stronger it seems to get the more vulnerable it becomes. Like a tower of cards the whole edifice is in danger of toppling at any moment. Every move they make to strengthen their position also makes them weaker.

I see the main challenge not as defeating them but rather in limiting the harm of their failure. Their psychopathology may drive the world to extinction.

3. Control resources: the psychopaths lose the ability to reward and deprive

Each step is more difficult to achieve than the one before it and increases the chances of confrontation and violent reprisal. That is why we hear more about the first, less about the second, and almost nothing about the third.

"I have pinned my faith to the spinning wheel. On it, I believe, the salvation of the country depends." Gandhi.

Ultimately we will have to control resources, provide for our communities and deprive the psychopaths. Doing that should become a focus of our discussions and actions.

Eric, I have been keeping up with your posts for years. These truths have been very life changing for me and have also influenced those around me. My question is... how do we stop it? Can we stop it? Why is it so difficult to start a revolution?