About Me

This site is the inspiration of a former reporter/photographer for one of New England's largest daily newspapers and for various magazines. The intent is to direct readers to interesting political articles, and we urge you to visit the source sites. Any comments may be noted on site or directed to KarisChaf at gmail.

Friday, January 31, 2014

Drum roll…..the long awaited GOP principles
on illegal immigration were presented today to the House GOP Conference
at their annual [aptly-named] retreat. Sorry to disappoint you but
there is nothing new under the sun. Their framework is a mirror image
of the Senate “Gang of 8” bill, albeit cloaked in even more deceptive
and disingenuous language in order to distract conservatives with shiny
objects. Let’s go through some of the text:

After proposing broad amnesty, the document says that” none of this
can happen before specific enforcement triggers have been implemented.”
That might sound like it was written by the Tea Party, but in reality
every GOP leader has made it clear that enforcement triggers mean
something ambiguous after the “probationary” legal status is granted.

Legalization before amnesty is the key point. Everything else is
window dressing. Once they are legalized there is no turning back.
There will never be any leverage to implement the universally
agreed-upon security measures thereafter. This is beyond Lucy and the
football already.

“There will be no special path to citizenship for individuals who
broke our nation’s immigration laws – that would be unfair to those
immigrants who have played by the rules and harmful to promoting the
rule of law.” This is the big lie. Once legal status is granted before
the enforcement is in place and the magnets are removed, they will get
citizenship. If there is this much pressure to legalize them when they
are totally illegal, there is no way they will permanently reside here
without citizenship for more than a year. At that point, Chuck Schumer
will push for citizenship. Furthermore, the notion that this is not a
special pathway is nonsense. The traditional pathway is in the country of origin. Staying in the country is the special pathway.

The Dream Act is full amnesty, a disaster and a farce. It is
particularly irresponsible to push that without asking for changes to
birthright citizenship and the welfare state in exchange. They will be
eligible for immediate legal status and citizenship shortly thereafter.
These people are largely poor and low-skilled. They would be eligible
for the entire array of welfare programs. Moreover, once you have
amnesty for “Dreamers” it is defacto amnesty for everyone else because
A) they can bring in family members and B) anyone can potentially be
eligible, so ICE would have to suspend all deportations to allow
illegals a reasonable opportunity to present their case. Sans a
proposal to change birthright citizenship first, the Dream Act would
expand our anchor baby magnet to an “anchor teenager” phenomenon.

“One of the great founding principles of our country was that
children would not be punished for the mistakes of their parents.” Here
is another big lie. They claim that we can’t “punish” children nor
could we withhold legal status from anyone because it is not humane.
Yet, they proceed to claim “we must ensure now that when immigration
reform is enacted, there will be a zero tolerance policy for those who
cross the border illegally or overstay their visas in the future. “
This is internally incoherent. Once you telegraph the message that as
soon as someone successfully comes here illegally and puts down roots,
we will not have the stomach to deport them, why would that change
during the next cycle? If amnesty for illegal children is a “founding
principle,” then we have to have a perpetual amnesty for such children
in perpetuity. The reality is that unless we implement all enforcement
long before any amnesty, we will continue the perennial cycle of open
borders and sympathy-driven amnesty. And that is exactly how they want
it.

The best way to solve a problem is to first honestly admit there is a
problem. By refusing to call them illegals, and instead opting for
euphemisms like “Individuals Living Outside the Rule of Law,” they are
showing that there is no commitment to clamp down on illegal immigration
in the future.

There is no mention of a border fence. A physical fence is the only
thing proven to work. Also, it is not subject to manipulation or
“prosecutorial discretion.” It actually works, and that is why they
don’t want it.

There is no mention of the 800-pound gorilla – the magnets of
welfare and unqualified birthright citizenship. The only way to offer
an amnesty [after enforcement] without repeating the mistakes of the
past is to finally cut off the incentives to come here illegally in the
future. All they have to do is come here and drop a baby on American
soil. At that point, the baby is an American citizen and can secure
welfare on behalf of the family. Additionally, this is the same flaw
with any temporary worker program. If they have kids, these workers
will never be temporary. Also, the whole idea of a guest worker program
is so the special interest lobbies can secure slave wages on behalf of
agribusiness. With American-born children they would have the need and
the ability to secure welfare payments.

Finally, it is dangerous and irresponsible to begin pushing any of
this before Obama begins to follow the current laws. We are ostensibly
advertising for people to come here from across the border and overstay
their visas. If there is a long period of time when legal status is
offered before the Fence is built and Exit-Entry is put into place,
millions more will flood our country.

Courage In America strives to locate news articles that may interest readers. However, while we include stories from sources which we believe to be reliable and credible, we do not write the articles nor do we establish that they are correct. We accept no responsibility for the accuracy or reliability of information provided here and encourage readers to do their own research.