And also, as Andrew pointed out in his recent message - cvs itself is a
package, and not in the NetBSD "tree". Will that change before NetBSD is
officially made available via anoncvs (or is there at least a definite plan
to put it in the tree)? If not, then it could be argued that backpedalling
is in order (although I won't do it myself, because I don't want to get
caught in the middle of this ;-)
At 02:00 PM 5/4/99 -0600, Michael K. Sanders wrote:
>In message <199905041846.LAA04017@Cup.DSG.Stanford.EDU>, Jonathan Stone
writes:
>>If it's an ``official'' solution, it goes in the tree. Just like sup.
>>That means the compiler goes in the tree.
>>That means we have to support it.
>
>Wasn't sup distributed separately, back before there was even a NetBSD
>package system?
>
>