Glad to see my work is appreciated. An insane, strangle-happy mobster seems to suit you. I was thinking, considering Tagz doesn't come here anymore, I guess that makes you the badass around here, eh? 114.77.77.5 23:24, January 21, 2012 (UTC)

I put a table up on the .44 magnum revolver (Fallout: New Vegas) page showing weapons durability across all mods and ammo types (it's a test, some of the data needs adjustment) as part of the weapon condition project. I'm interested in what you think of the format and fit on the page. I'll take it back down once you get a chance to look at it. The Gunny 23:54, January 21, 2012 (UTC)

I have no idea why I'm Obi-Wan Kenobi, but it seems right. 114.77.77.5 09:13, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

Carith has stated his/her intention to withdraw on their talk page. With the conflcit now removed I'm satisifed that the conditions are right to enable the logo vote to continue in an orderly fashion as long as the following rules were added "No Further Subsitutions" and "Judges (ie- Me) decision is final on rule interpretation". That said, I'm not 100% convinced its a good idea. I'm interested to know what you think. Agent c 16:38, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

I think you're probably right. I left Clyde a note with what I thought were the 4 possible options for the process, and from that recommended I pick 3 finalists and he chooses a winner; I think that's still probably the least worst option. Agent c 16:50, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

Awh, you know me so well. <3 For the next time you scribble me, I'm a medic! Skål! 03:19, January 23, 2012 (UTC)

Tell me what you think so far. :3 [1][2] I also have Doc Incognito making me a logo, etc. and I will be setting up an interview with him as well! Let me know if there's anything else I should add. ^^ Skål! 17:28, January 23, 2012 (UTC)

I'm thinking of making this a weekly thing. I'm also going to put in a challenge where whoever wins becomes featured and gets to choose the next weeks poll idea. I'll let you know as soon as I add that in. My hope is that maybe this will help bring the community a little closer together. Skål! 17:40, January 23, 2012 (UTC)

That's the only reason I haven't added it in yet. I already have a first idea for one, I'm just trying to figure out how I can implement it properly. Well, thanks for the feedback! Let me know if you have any ideas for improvement! Skål! 17:51, January 23, 2012 (UTC)

Just thought I'd let you know I started a forum about the historical figures. That, and I'm thinking about returning as Yes-Man. Because we all know I never left. I'm still mulling it over though. 114.77.77.5 07:01, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

Not sure what half those words mean, but god dammit was it inspiring. I think I just might log back in. Delete my Goodbye blog post for me, old chap. I'll be soon writing a new one. I might call it... I dunno. Something about returning. 114.77.77.5 08:43, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

It's me! Yeah, I know it's not that big a deal considering we've talked pretty much every day since I became an anon. But no more of that! I've written a blog post about my return. Make sure to tell folks and whatnot. I'll probably be in chat tomorrow morning despite the fact that I have way more important things to do. Oh, and sign my friend's list if you want. Which I know you want to. At least, I hope you want to. 09:22, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

As a try out, I've changed the favicon to File:Favicon.ico (thumbs up vault boy). Probably needs some time to update. Another option can be the bottlecap. One of those 2 looks the best option. Jspoel 01:39, January 25, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I know they shouldn't show the HUD. But in that instance, it seemed like I needed to in order to show the effect of the Sneak Sight better. Otherwise it was just a sepia-toned building, which isn't very interesting. Either way, no probs. 10:47, January 25, 2012 (UTC)

Yesterday I changed the favicon to Doc Incognito's one. Adjusted the color a bit to match the logo. I'm satisfied with the result and suggest we use it. I'll do an admin round on it and then we can leave it behind us. Jspoel 14:27, January 26, 2012 (UTC)

For suggesting I do this, for having the faith in my to sponsor my application and for being just amazing! I will make you proud, my dearest Swede, I promise. All my loves are belong to you. And Andrew. And Chad. But that is another matter. Mucho loveo for the KoC (King of Chat) :p <3 "Even In Death May You Be Triumphant" 11:29, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

I see. It was a misunderstanding then, because I was under assumption you reacted to Doc Incognito's bottlecap favicon. But things haven't turned out bad. Spent an hour or so pixel by pixel recreating that cap, and now it has more 'edges', more like the old Vault logo. An improvement I think. See File:Favicon.ico. You say you don't get the new favicon to appear, maybe you can remove this wiki from your favorites and add it again. That worked for me when I also still had that Vault Boy, while I had already changed the wordmark file to the bottlecap. But today we're still having a slight problem. As said, yesterday, after your response, I updated the bottlecap and today it doesn't appear yet. Also removing it from the favorites and adding it again didn't work. Give it some more time I think. Jspoel 14:37, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

A minute ago my favorites as well as the address bar icon changed from Doc's icon to my updated one! So everything's good now. Jspoel 14:53, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for proving my point scar. if you have any questions... go on my wiki ill be more than happy to answer. your friend --Bradley "Teddy" Herrell 15:58, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

I see how it all plays out scar. DB is trying to play you guys. dont let him vandilize the enclave wiki, please im being as serious as i ever was. hugs? --Bradley "Teddy" Herrell 16:09, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

Albert I remember when you started contributing to this wiki and it has been so great to watch you grow from a standard user to one of the most trusted admins on this wiki. You've always been cool with me and I'll miss you. *hugs --RAM 09:08, January 29, 2012 (UTC)

I announce my formal exile. I do not know when I'll be back, but be sure to chat ban me. And lift the ban when I decide to go back. Arrivederci, Albert. --"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." 10:32, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

Apparently, mastiffs are gay. Well, at least according to this user who made a page just to let the community know about the sexual orientation of a breed of dogs. I think he deserves a three day ban at the least. Thanks. 08:20, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

Fair enough. And I highly doubt Mastiffs are homosexual, otherwise the breed would have died out long ago. Anyway, thanks for that. Come Sunday, I'll might be able to ban those types myself. 08:26, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

{{Y-M chat ban}
I made a template. Now, when I type in {{Y-M chat ban}, it automatically comes up with my chat ban message. No more copy-pasting. Banning made simple. 03:17, February 2, 2012 (UTC)

... Well then. That makes my template a lot less spectacular :P

And here I was thinking I'd gone and done something revolutionary. Yet once again I underestimate the Swedish genius and his several-paramater template for chat bans! Well, at least I'm up to speed with you now. 06:50, February 2, 2012 (UTC)

Well I think my point has been proven. Another user has been driven away for having a differing opinion.

I sincerely hope that seeing this will open your eyes to how the attitude of chat mods can severely affect the number of users. Continue on this route and you will discourage a huge number of people from participating in this wiki. By allowing only people who agree with you to stay in chat and express themselves without insults you severely limit the number of people who will be willing to contribute to this wiki.

I only want the best for this wiki and I hope that this will show you the negative effect that your behavior and the behavior of others to people with differing opinions is having on this site.

I wish I could say my time here was enjoyed but you guys make that impossible. I hope that one day you and the others will improve your behaviors towards others, if not for the sake of the users than for the sake of the site itself. I hope that you do not discount this message as "trolling" for the sake of future users.

But as for right now. Congratulations Scar, you win, you've chased away another user.

What would be considered a normal ban for the original user? Skål! 09:32, February 9, 2012 (UTC)

Three days doesn't seem like enough, though. Three days is your average profanity-spouting anon. Maybe a week or something? 09:38, February 9, 2012 (UTC)

I have to agree with Yessie. Creating a sock-puppet account and spamming nonsense warrants somewhere between a month to a year without reasonable explanation. If there is a good reason? Then I might consider being more lax and reducing it to a week or so. Skål! 09:40, February 9, 2012 (UTC)

I've set it to a month. I think that's a fair amount of time. Feel free to dispute. I know it seems harsh because it was Ramallah, but regardless who it was, they broke the rules. 09:42, February 9, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, 1 month sounds fair. I thought both of those users have been indefinitely banned though? Yakov only being an exception because Tag stuck up for him. Skål! 09:46, February 9, 2012 (UTC)

┌─────────────┘
They were indefinately banned after multiple offences, not one. As according to policy. Stick to the one month verdict. Hugs "Say 'ello to my little friend!" 09:48, February 9, 2012 (UTC)

Ah. Not arguing with the one-month though. I was just under the impression that sock-puppetry was met with a perma-ban. Skål! 09:50, February 9, 2012 (UTC)

'Ello again. Found a glitch/exploit that presents itself as a strategy in the last note of the Fat Man (Fallout 3) page. Don't really know where to put it, so I leave it up to your discretion. KnowledgeProspector 07:35, February 10, 2012 (UTC)

Apparntly he has changed his name and is now possing to be a women on the internet: Brad. I figured i would show you so you can decide on how to deal with this matter, personally, ban him, we don't want another PipGirl incident around here.TheNemesisx 14:13, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

It is speculation to say that it is cancelled, yes? Skål! 08:27, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

Not noting it all on that page is not speculation. That is neutrality showing that we do not know whether it was cancelled or if it's still be working on, just in different hands. Skål! 08:30, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

Not disagreeing with you there. What I'm saying is that it does not belong on the cancelled Fallout ideas list. All information about FOOL and the politics behind it are already noted on its actual page. Once we have confirmation, we should put whether it's being worked on/hiatus/cancelled. So far, they haven't confirmed anything so we need to keep neutral about the whole subject. Skål! 08:36, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

"...so as far as we're concerned, FOOL died when Bethesda won the legal battle." That's not what I would consider a professional opinion, by the way. Skål! 08:39, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

You're setting a bad example for other members to follow. Like, 'hey look an admin can type it, so that means so can we.' It was really an unnecessary addition to your comment. I've frowned upon some other examples in the past but now I'm a step up I feel more responsibility to keep an eye on these thing. And you mean bureaucrat I presume. I wondered, why didn't you vote for my request? Jspoel 17:22, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Hey Scar. I saw your recent change to the administrators and moderators page. Such a thing hasn't been formally discussed with the community, and may not be noticed or approved by the community. Something like this needs to be formally discussed. -ΣΔLet's talk! 20:46, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Alrighty then, I understand. I suppose Limmie's request may have played a part here. She had only been a moderator for around 20 days. It's a good addition, in my opinion. Obviously it couldn't affect her request (post de facto), but is good for limiting future requests and having better candidates eh? Thanks for replying. -ΣΔLet's talk! 20:56, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

I'm sure you know that I'm on military deployment, and if not, now you do. Anyways, onto the thing I came here to say. This is easily the most dangerous thing I've ever had to do, and I just wanted to say that if I get labelled KIA/MIA, I just want you to try and forget about me. It sounds stupid, I know, but it's for the better.

I think you missed my point. I really don't care where the term molotov cocktail came from, the fact is that the firebomb is not called a molotov cocktail and they were not initially invented my the Finnish during WWII. Even though they might not have been called molotov cocktails before the Winter Wars, they were still nevertheless used beforehand. Skål! 22:19, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

I am an arsehole. ;) Never denied that little fact. Skål! 22:28, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

Hi Scarface, i believe the administrator who kicked me from the fallout chat, Agent C, has broken a violation in which he has kicked me for no reason whatsoever.He kicked me because i was expressing my opinion on KONY 2012, where other people in the chat were also talking about it in a political debate.He gave me no warning whatsoever to this ludacris ban and the people who were talking about KONY are still in the fallout chat.I believe i have been segragated and ask that i am allowed to rejoin the chat after a review has been looked into it.
Thak You,
Yours Sincerely,
--Sotres 19:21, March 10, 2012 (UTC)Sotres

Oh the Irony eh Scar?

6:54 Agent c Guys, Political discussions require Unanimous consent, Rich has withheld his consent, no more talk on this

6:54 RamboRob196 ......... Ok,

6:54Limmiegirl Geez are you guys still on about that Kony guy

CZ57 has joined the chat.

6:54 Sotres im UK not american so i wouldnt know

6:54 Zerginfestor no no

6:54 RamboRob196 Hold one. LAST bloody thing.

6:54 Agent c The mod has unfortunately spoken

6:54 Zerginfestor I'm on our nation Limmie

6:54 Kittynator NeverFallout: Why?

6:54 Agent c No Rob

(Snip)

RamboRob196 Ok, Rick. May I make one question regarding to what Sotres just said?

Why have I been banned from chat? All I said was that some guy seemed to be full of sh*t, which was a joke as a matter of fact, and then you swore at me and I told you to calm down. Also, it says I've been banned for three days but I still can't access chat, as it says I'm still banned! Please can you unban me.

no offense but do i really wanna come back if ure just going to ban me i mean i just wnat to have fun but i cant do that so give me one good reason to come back to the chat —Preceding unsigned comment added by Delta593 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Just had to share this one with ya. I reverted this from the Hoover Dam page:

“

You are given a radio at the start, where you can call in 5 Behemoths to assault at the start. Halfway through, you are given a Commander X Megaman MK11 radio to activate Liberty Prime, who will smash through the main defences. If you are with the Legion, you can ride on Legate Lanius' back, who will take you through the bridge whilst you can shoot enemies from the safety of his back.

”

It was just too ridiculous to not keep. Mind you, I severely fixed the spelling and grammar because it was nothing short of atrocious beforehand. 10:45, March 21, 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I thought I was being completely objective. Just like Cartman. Because, you know, it's not like he was attacking me in that forum. I'm just following his oh-so brilliant administrator example.
As for you. Albert looks out for one person and one person only. Albert. You don't give a crap about me so don't pretend like you do. You know I'm not going to make the re-confirmation request. You're making damn good sure of that. And these poor people are too afraid to speak out against anything.
So, have fun when this blows over and I'm gone for good. You'll be the admin you want to be, the man who brings forward the big issues and all that crap. Enjoy your time in the limelight. 23:51, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

I just looked on six other wikis, and they all had "Trophies" capitalized in their "Achievements and Trophies" sections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TRocky2 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Seems like a lot of people all the sudden aren't going to be able to make it today. :/ It looks like I'm going to have to bump it to sometime this upcoming week then. When do you think would be a good time? Skål! 13:42, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Tuesday seems like another good day for the majority. I'll ask around and see if that might be good day or not. Skål! 13:48, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

I'm really hoping we can clear the air with this meeting as well. I think it would be good for us to thoroughly discuss everything in a controlled environment where everyone can have their ideas heard without fear of it just being shot down. I'll be looking forward to seeing you then! I'll let you know as soon as I figure out the times for the first meeting. Skål! 13:53, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Absolutely. I'm going to have it where someone will bring up a point thoroughly and only when they're finished can people give their thoughts on the matter. Only one person at a time so it doesn't turn into a huge chaotic mess. Let me know if you have any preferences on how things are run at the meetings. Skål! 19:04, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I was thinking of something along those lines as well. Maybe have it where a person types * to let everyone know they're currently writing something out next. Skål! 19:12, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, it sucks that these meetings will always have to be an inconvenience for at least a few people. I'll be starting the meeting out with some basic points though and then I'll go ahead and let people express what they think needs to be discussed next. We'll come to a consensus on the next topic and we'll have someone start us off. Skål! 19:18, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

5 hours? You're right about it being 3 in the morning, but the meeting takes place in 29 hours from now. Which would technically be Wednesday for you, but it's still Tuesday at 0100 GMT. Hope that clears this up for you. Skål! 19:51, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

You don't quite get my point. Whoever wrote up that section is making extreme conclusions about all of Maryland based solely on Point Lookout, which is a much, much smaller location than the Capital Wasteland -- which in-game is a good 2/5ths Maryland, 2/5ths Virginia, and 1/5th DC, give or take. Anything north or east of the Potomac (though dried up, still visible on the map) not including DC is Maryland (everything southwest is Virginia). Point Lookout is probably half the size of the Maryland portion of the base map, which is why "Maryland Wasteland" and the conclusions drawn from the one location are incredibly misleading. Йура 15:25, March 29, 2012 (UTC)

So because you refuse to discuss what it would be like to have land vehicles in the FPS Fallout titles, I deserve to be kickbanned? That makes sense You couldn't just humor the idea and think about it outside the realm of reality, you just went straight to (paraphrased) "Nope. Wouldn't work, it'd suck. Breaks the immersion, fast-travel is better." I don't see why the fact that you brick-wall reject it in imagination as if you'd get in trouble for it, means that I had to be removed from the chat, much less permanently. I'd hate to picture what you'd be like on a creative development team if that's how fervently you quash hypothetical concepts. Nevertheless, you're an admin and I guess you had your reasons.--A-bloogey-woogey-woo, said the disgruntled yet sassy serial killer. 23:00, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Like I said, you probably had your reasons. And you did. I just don't know why you wouldn't see it as fun to think about it. After all, the Warthog is powered by Hydrogen so it could have a little "fuel tank" inventory for Dirty/Purified Waters, and Aqua Pura could be like... hyper-octane fuel. I just think it'd add a lot of fun to the travelling and exploration if you could speed down the bomb-shattered roads and over ashen hills faster than a Cazador. I'm sorry that you don't see it that way and that I overreacted because of it, and this is the end of my part in the discussion.

Do they realize I was being satirical? This makes the second time this has happened over controversial reasons. Must I be banned for every little thing that I do, even if it is over littel things like these?

I had no intent to actually call you racist. You guys have no sense of humor, at all really. I may get banned from the wiki today, but by God's grace I'll go down fighting for what I believe in. For Lenin!

Not really. I'm not communist, just a revolutionary at heart. No fighting. Too tired. Pacifist anyway. (sigh)

I hate to sound like I'm talking down to you, but I am standing by what I said. All I see in chat now are people talking behind his back and people generally working themselves up to dramatic proportions beyond what that Blog could have ever originally created. While I do agree that he should have left a couple things out for the general public not to see, I also believe that other users are using this as a chance to cause a disruption, whether they intend to or not. As I said, it is easy to find a private setting to talk this through and I have locked the blog from further commenting. I can't stop people in chat from talking behind everyone's backs like cowards, but I will stop this from distracting people from the main essence of this wiki. The main article space. Skål! 21:39, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Talk-pages aren't personal. :') They belong to the community and show up in the recent changes feed for everyone to see. Your message was just as visible as Yessie's blog. (With the exception that your message doesn't show up in the popular page section.) As for finding a private place, that is very simple. It's called leave him a message that you want to talk privately. I know for a fact that he uses the Vault Armory as a good place to do so and you have seen him refer to that chat quite a bit. Skål! 21:49, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

No one owns their talk-pages. My talk-page? Isn't mine even in the slightest. Only your profile is yours, and even then, your options are limited and confined. As for talking with Yessie, yes you can. Leave him a message asking for an e-mail or a secure website that you can leave your message there for. Time differences are easy to figure out, you're only making it difficult by considering live chat. Also, please don't tell me what I can and can't use. Smileys in no way or form will harm you. And they most certainly shouldn't upset you. Skål! 22:02, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Not sure how to write this up, but I'll try anyway. I'll just be writing whatever comes naturally, forgive me if it becomes incoherent.

I'll be honest, reading your response, I was almost in tears. Not for me. For you. Even if you are different now, you were still my best friend. And that whole time, I never even knew what was going through your head. I thought I did, but who am I to assume I know what another is thinking? I don't know what has gotten into me... I guess for so long in a familiar environment, it's hard to see it change, and adapt well to the changes. And we all know I have a flair for the dramatic, and I'm more emotional than a twelve year old girl at a Justin Beiber concert (sorry, I had to lighten the mood somehow).

If I had known how much my brash stupidity had hurt you, I would never have put you through it. But it wasn't easy to see when you wouldn't let me in. Despite thinking I know more than I do, turns out I'm not a mind reader. Yes, I'm immature and I tend to make things all about me. Could be from an extremely sheltered upbringing, I don't really know. So I didn't really think much of it when I left or what actions I took after that. It's hard to tell if someone is hurting when they put up a barrier between themselves and the people around them, and considering you don't trust me (which even I can see is fair) I can't say I'm surprised you went on the way you did. Besides, this is the only place you can really contact me, considering I don't have Facebook or any of those other trivial websites, and I wouldn't nor should I expect you to spill your guts for me here.

I'll accept that I did change too. Or, rather, I let a different side of me out that people weren't used to. I'm not really as optimistic and willing as I pretend to be, as you're aware. I know I've said it multiple times but in reality I'm a weak, pathetic and somewhat lonely individual. Sure I have a handful of friends but it's the people here who I can really relate to, regardless of if they're on the other side of the Earth. I still stand by what I said last year about counting the number of people who would care if I died on my fingers. And so when one of my few friends is slowly drifting away, there's little I can do but watch them go, then blame them for my own inability to act on it. I'm a selfish bastard, yet I'll rarely admit it.

I assumed I knew your motivations and I always considered you to be acting out of some sort of pent up disdain for me that you had hidden all along. God knows why; then again, you were always the more logical of the two of us. So I took it personally when you acted out against me while not even realising what I was doing to you. And how hard it was for you to act out what you needed to. Knowing what I know now, I can see that you did it with best intentions and I can admit that I've been entirely wrong this whole time. I thought my problems were bad? Who the fuck do I think I am, really? It tears me apart to see you like this, and knowing you were the victim all along makes me feel terrible. Please understand I was talking out of sorrow and confusion at a supposed betrayal that never occurred anywhere other than inside my own, weak, mind.

I really don't know how to sum this up, as saying sorry won't mean shit by this point. That doesn't mean I'm not sorry; with all my heart I can never apologise enough. And even if you did forgive me, it wouldn't alleviate this guilt that I carry with me now. I do get worked up over this Wiki. But it's not because of the Wiki; it's because of the community. The real people, like you and me, who I get emotionally attached to. I suppose that's where we differ - where you take a step away, I let myself be pulled further into this illusion that we're all one big happy family. I know people talk behind my back; I've known it since before I even started that blog. A blog which I've grown to hate... what started as a simple apology ended worse than I could have imagined. I have regrets, we all do. I understand entirely if you've had enough of me. I'm sure many people including myself consider me more trouble than I'm worth. I'm not going to bring other people into this (although I did type up a suitable analogy for Frazier which I removed on account of it not being of any help to anyone). If you want no more of me, just say the word and I'll never speak of any of it again. But if you want to give me the second chance I so selfishly pleaded for in that blog post, that would be the first step towards rebuilding what was lost.

Its okay that you removed the page, but basically I wanted to make a page where it would list all of the wars that have occurred in the region as that does not seem entirely covered as of yet. --Mr. Youtube 23:36, May 12, 2012 (UTC)

Hey, so recently me and Garoux had a debate on this page, NCR-Great Khan War, as to whent he war started. We both came to several points that we ended up agreeing on one thing. That one thing was that we should talk to one of our two beaurcrats about the debate and the conclusion we came to, make a page similar to the War on Terror page on Wikipedia and make a War on Raiders page covering the NCR's fight against the Khans, Vipers and Jackals, this page would encompass everything already said on the NCR-Great Khan War and thus would allow that page to be merged in to the War on Raiders page. Before I contacted a beau I wanted to give you this information for your advice on the topic and your point of view on it. --Mr. Youtube 01:36, May 14, 2012 (UTC)

It's probably me, but I'm not sure where to look on that page to get the point. Should one of the images reflect on me? Only was able to find a Keanu Reeves image, same as the one on my userpage I got from Two-Bears. Jspoel 20:41, May 15, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry to ruin your Matrix movies. Maybe I should change it to Will Smith as he appears in Men in Black then. He's called Agent J there. Jspoel 21:23, May 15, 2012 (UTC)

I was right. I had to redo your usage of the template. I thought something was off with the formatting from the recent changes to templates and css, but it's fine, you just forgot to use {{subst:}}. You gotta use this on templates that use {{subst:}} coincident with <onlyinclude>, or they won't show correctly. The full usage would be: {{subst:User:Scarface11235/Ban|day=3|10}}. That was fun to play with and figure out. I did learn something. Thanks, The Gunny 23:31, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

Hey Al, there's a guy in chat who needs a ban; spamming, excessive caps lock, vulgar comments to multiple users. we have given him some warnings, and he still wont stop :/. his name is SuaveElfMale. kthanxbai The lone wanderer's bad-ass grandma 13:38, May 25, 2012 (UTC)