"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

<quoted text>Nuk goes under several alias including pretending to be you part of the time. He screws up and sometimes answers under the wrong ID.So the moron thinks everyone else has numerous IDs too

Yes, I know. He was one of the dopes who also was a sockpuppet on the Obama 600,000 job thread who was humiliated due to his ignorance there on several occasions. He is just a typical Democrat moron. I think this weirdo is Not Surprized too. A real bona fide psychopath.

<quoted text>Waxturd!! ROFLMAO!!""Since Virginia does not have partisan registration there is also no way to tell whether Seung-Hui Cho was a Democrat, but again because there is no partisan registration in the state we can say that the claim that he is a registered Democrat is FALSE.(Update: A more obvious point is that Cho was a resident alien, not a US citizen, so he was not eligible to vote in the US)""----------He wasn't even a citizen, yet you stupidly claim he was a Democrat.Must be those gay diseases fking with your brain, Waxturd!!

Columbine ~~~ Too young to vote; both families Dylan Klebold's and Eric Harris' parents were registered Democrats and progressive liberals

Aunt Bettie Lou, "Find any source - not moveon.org , etc.- where Bush is solely blamed for the housing market crisis." Only Wall Street and Big Mortgage Lenders were blamed more than Bush W.."Sixty-eight percent of Americans — including 49 percent of Republicans — say President George W. Bush is responsible for the state of today’s economy, a new Gallup poll finds.

Indeed, the country is still reeling from Bush’s disastrous economic stewardship. His irresponsible tax cuts and deregulatory policies have contributed significantly to the slow recovery and are partly responsible for the nation’s economic plight." ... "1. Deregulated Wall Street: It was a great time to be a Wall Street executive during the Bush administration. Sweeping financial deregulation helped build the housing bubble and allowed financial institutions to pursue risky trades unchecked. In fact, Bush eliminated the rules that allowed Wall Street to cause the financial crash that plunged the nation into the Great Recession."... "4. Left Homeowners In A Lurch: While Bush was happy to help out the banks in the wake of the housing crisis, he did little to assist struggling homeowners. Hope For Homeowners, Bush’s proposal to assist those struggling with their mortgages, was a colossal failure; in its first six months, it helped just one homeowner renegotiate his mortgage. Many mortgage holders — 15.7 million or, one in three — are still underwater today. "Check this out: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/06/14/4...

<quoted text>Storage tanks Flacko not silos__no manufacturing going on at Kinder Morgan.The chemical elements that created the Texas blast do not exist in your area and what does exist is routinely inspected by multiple government agencies.Get a mental picture of Kinder-Morgan catching fire and no one having a fkn clue what to do.Stay stupid pal__I'm off to the beach for seafood__broiled__not deep fried.

Why such the way over-stock, beyond government regulations even then, you think?

The vote in the Senate actually happened before the vote. That means, knowing the Senate did not—and would not—approve the treaty, the Obama administration defied the will of the legislature—and the people—to vote in favor of the pact at the U.N. Knowing this, President Obama has also vowed to sign the treaty in the next few months. Given the administration’s history of subverting the Constitution at every turn, I am very concerned about the future of the Second Amendment and the under-handed tactics they administration may use.

Bloomberg Says Interpretation of Constitution Has to Change – NEVER ALLOW IT TO BE CHANGED!

Folks,

Please read the article from NRA-ILA that follows my comments. Please do not disregard my comments.They are based in fact and spurred by conviction.

...

WRONG IN EVERY WAY!

The United States belongs to the People in every way. Nothing about the United States belongs to the government!The Constitution has put us in charge of our country and our government for a reason. That reason being that ourFounders knew that men are weak and when presented with temptations of power, influence, position and wealthon a daily basis and without anyone watching, that they would eventually fall to those temptations. When they didthey would forget constituents, oaths, and all tenants of patriotic duty and moral responsibility given to them bythose whose interests they are supposed to represent and in the Constitution upon which the system of laws inthe United States are based.

<quoted text>I like the comment that some poster made earlier. I challenge you to find one site that is NOT an op-ed nor comes from left wing sites such as Mother Jones (David Korn has lost his mind), Mediate, Think Progress, MoveOn et al that states that one person was solely responsible.

<quoted text>You are confused again David. Work force participation is an actual figure monitored by the BSL that show the actual number of people working -which is way down. FEWER people are working.Then you come along and try to interject a percentage that you have failed to link to. Your link was broken. Nor have you stated what the title of the table stated or any other concrete info. Get us a working link.To help you out here Dave the number of individuals entering workforce age each year is greater than those retiring.

The comment said FEWER PEOPLE were working.

My post had numbers that showed more people are working.

If you wanted to talk about the participation rate you should have worded your comment differently.

Aunt Bettie Lou, "Find any source - not moveon.org , etc.- where Bush is solely blamed for the housing market crisis." Only Wall Street and Big Mortgage Lenders were blamed more than Bush W.."Sixty-eight percent of Americans — including 49 percent of Republicans — say President George W. Bush is responsible for the state of today’s economy, a new Gallup poll finds.Indeed, the country is still reeling from Bush’s disastrous economic stewardship. His irresponsible tax cuts and deregulatory policies have contributed significantly to the slow recovery and are partly responsible for the nation’s economic plight." ... "1. Deregulated Wall Street: It was a great time to be a Wall Street executive during the Bush administration. Sweeping financial deregulation helped build the housing bubble and allowed financial institutions to pursue risky trades unchecked. In fact, Bush eliminated the rules that allowed Wall Street to cause the financial crash that plunged the nation into the Great Recession."... "4. Left Homeowners In A Lurch: While Bush was happy to help out the banks in the wake of the housing crisis, he did little to assist struggling homeowners. Hope For Homeowners, Bush’s proposal to assist those struggling with their mortgages, was a colossal failure; in its first six months, it helped just one homeowner renegotiate his mortgage. Many mortgage holders — 15.7 million or, one in three — are still underwater today. "Check this out: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/06/14/4...

Why wouldn't they say that? The Lame Stream media, has been a Democratic lapdog from time immemorial. Your "think progress" is socialistic, if not downright communistic. But you still hang on to that garbage. Why don't you think for yourself??

<quoted text>The comment said FEWER PEOPLE were working.My post had numbers that showed more people are working.If you wanted to talk about the participation rate you should have worded your comment differently.As you posted it, it was incorrect.

<quoted text>The comment said FEWER PEOPLE were working.My post had numbers that showed more people are working.If you wanted to talk about the participation rate you should have worded your comment differently.As you posted it, it was incorrect.

Dave, It appears you have cherry picked charts that exclude certain individuals in the tally. The chart I provided is a total and much more accurate.

Now please explain how total number of people working and number of people participating in the work force would be totally different numbers. They are not.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.