Aspartame In The 90s – Resistance Is Futile

By the 1990s, aspartame’s side-effects were obvious, but no one believed it – not even the doctors.

By the 1990s, aspartame, found exclusively as NutraSweet/Equal®, was well positioned. Top-notch marketing and crafty advertising were creating a “diet industry fad.” The more weight people gained, the more diet products they sold.

Sugar-bashing was accepted as the norm, and movie stars, sports figures, and celebrities were seen flashing their diet cola cans as “the way to go” if you want to be anybody.

Resistance Is Futile

No one wanted to hear the truth about aspartame dangers – not the doctors, not the government, and definitely not the consumers sucking down 12-packs of diet sodas every day.

The research proving aspartame’s health dangers was getting little to no attention, and the efforts to warn consumers about the “dangerous side” of aspartame were falling on to deaf ears.

The mantra was” If the FDA approved it, then it must be safe.” Sadly, aspartame’s victims were ignored, but everyone was watching Cher on the Diet Coke® commercials.

1991

The first National Symposium on the Safety of NutraSweet/Equal was held at The University of North Texas at Denton, November 8-9, directed by Dr. Janet Starr Hull.

1993

Shephard and her colleagues attempted to simulate in vitro the conditions from aspartame that occur in the human digestive tract, and in particular the conditions that result in the nitrosation of dietary ingredients. They reported that the nitrosated aspartame had significant mutagenic action. This research identified a mechanism through which aspartame can exert a carcinogenic action.

Shephard’s research findings got little to no attention.

1996

Dr. John Olney of Washington University published an aspartame study in the Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology: November 1996.

Olney analyzed cancer statistics from the US National Cancer Institute covering a sample of approximately 10 percent of the US population for the period from 1975 to 1995.

He found that the introduction of aspartame into dry goods in 1981 and into soft drinks in 1983 was followed by an abrupt increase in the reported incidence of brain tumors. The change was most noticeable between 1984 and 1985, and it corresponded to approximately 1,500 extra cases of brain cancer per year in the US.

Olney’s findings got little to no attention.

1998

The Trocho study proved aspartame toxicity in the 1990s.

The diet sweetener industry was worth $1.5 billion, with 70 to 80 percent of the market from diet soft drinks.

Johnson & Johnson purchased the rights to develop sucralose in the United States as a commercially available product. They formed McNeil Specialty Products (renamed McNeil Nutritionals) as a part of the Johnson & Johnson corporate umbrella for the exclusive purpose of marketing Splenda.

The Trocho study was published on aspartame toxicity performed through the Bosch & Gimpera Foundation, Barcelona, Spain. The study concluded that aspartame consumption constitutes a health hazard because of its contribution to the formation of formaldehyde adducts.

The binding of methanol-derived carbon to tissue proteins was widespread in the study, affecting all body systems, and fully reaching the most sensitive targets such as the brain and the retina. (click this link for the original PDF research report)

The Battle Begins

As the turn of the century was about to unfold and the Y2K buzz filled the news, the sweetener corporations were preparing for an upcoming battle.

The NutraSweet Company had been netting BILLIONS of dollars when NutraSweet/Equal dominated the exclusive diet sweetener market. Now that NutraSweet’s extended aspartame patent had expired, saccharin users were returning to Sweet N’Low® and generic pink packs, and Splenda was preparing for its market debut.

Aspartame was forced to get back in the game – big time. “The Sweetener War” was about to heat up.

About Janet Hull PhD, CN

Janet Starr Hull, PhD, CN has been working with clients in the holistic health field since 1995. Using natural medicine to cure herself from a diagnosis of Graves’ disease caused by aspartame, Dr. Hull began researching the toxic causes of disease. Today, she is one of the world’s leading experts in environmental toxicology and holistic health and nutrition. Dr. Hull is the first researcher to publicly expose the dangers of aspartame. She has been writing her weekly email newsletter since 2002 covering a variety of holistic health and alternative medicine articles. Connect with Dr. Hull on Facebook, and Google Plus.

Information on this web site is provided for informational and educational purposes only. The information is a result of years of practice experience by the author. This information is not intended as a substitute for the advice provided by your physician or other healthcare professional or any information contained on or in any product label or packaging. Do not use the information on this web site for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disease, or prescribing medication or other treatment. Always speak with your physician or other healthcare professional before taking any medication or nutritional, herbal or homeopathic supplement, or using any treatment for a health problem. If you have or suspect that you have a medical problem, contact your health care provider immediately. Do not disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking professional advice because of something you have read on this web site. Information provided on this web site and the use of any products or services purchased from our web site by you DOES NOT create a doctor-patient relationship between you and any of the physicians affiliated with our web site. Information and statements regarding dietary supplements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease and serve only as educational.