I wouldn't be surprised if we start to see alot of new pics of things asking what colors and people freaking out in the comments sections. If not there should be a massive troll claiming things are different colors to spark a Facebook and twitter riot.

>>600797784I have tards telling me to adjust the brightness to the picture or the lighting of where I am at. I did everything. I think tards are just tards or probably just the biggest troll ever. FUck everybody fuck their science of eyes and ambient lights projectiling. just take an acid tab and let the color light show begin.

>>600798273have you ever heard of good and bad quality photos. the blue and black are more vivid on the high definition photo. but colorpicker still says its a shade of BLUE and more so a black, then a color. it doesnt have to be spot on fucking perfect. there are 16.8 million different colors.

The dress is blue and black, but sometimes, upon immediate observation, I see it as Pure, unmistakable white and gold for like 3 seconds before it clicks in my brain, and turns back to blue and black. This has only happened twice. I can't see the gold and white even if I try anymore. I've been in the same lighting the whole time

I FIGURED IT OUT, THEY JUST TOOK THE ORIGINAL IMAGE ALL THE WAY TO THE RIGHT, AND TOOK A NEGATIVE OF THE SAME PICTURE, AND LIGHTLY TINTED INTO WHITE AND GOLD BECAUSE THE DRESS IN NEGATIVE IS SOLID GOLD AND WHITE.

Your eyes have retinas, the things that let you interpret color. There’s rods, round things, and cones that stick out, which is what gives your eye a textured appearance in the colored part. The “cones” see color. The “rods” see shade, like black, white and grey. Cones only work when enough light passes through. So while I see the fabric as white, someone else may see it as blue because my cones aren’t responding to the dim lighting. My rods see it as a shade (white). There’s three cones, small, medium and large. They are blue sensitive, green sensitive, and red sensitive. As for the black bit (which I see as gold), it’s called additive mixing. Blue, green and red are the main colors for additive mixing. This is where it gets really tricky. Subtractive mixing, such as with paint, means the more colors you add the murkier it gets until it’s black. ADDITIVE mixing, when you add the three colors eyes see best, red, green and blue, (not to be confused with primary colors red, blue and yellow) it makes pure white.

—Blue and Black: In conclusion, your retina’s cones are more high functioning, and this results in your eyes doing subtractive mixing.

—White and Gold: our eyes don’t work well in dim light so our retinas rods see white, and this makes them less light sensitive, causing additive mixing, (that of green and red), to make gold.

and the picture is not changing colors. you're bonkers or completely computer illiterate if you think it's seriously changing colors when you look at it. it strains your eyes and it's an optical illusion. it never actually changes

Can't you see that its not about the color of the dress. We live in a world where different colors are sometimes side by side all of the time. Its about prejudice and racial suppression and it manifests itself through people's weak mind falling victim to color displasia.

>>600801691>Your eyes have retinasPlease somebody make these 4 words a dank meme for years to come so we will forever remember the day the us government distracted us from their FCC takeover with a blue dress

Stand up and stare at it from above your monitor. It should turn white and gold. Now sit on your knees and view it from below. It should turn dark blue and black. If I look at it normally it is a lavender/ugly brown.

See, you are all arguing and I got this all figured out!This is a giant Jewish conspiracy to get millions of people to go to their eye doctor tomorrow to see why they didn't see color X. Money will be spent, insurance premiums will increase, and they will all be seeing green.

Your brain is confused because it thinks the light from the background is making this a 3 dimensional image. If you stand above your monitor the background light will appear to be in the foreground and the dress will change to white and gold. If you view it from below it will change to blue and black (what it actually is in reality).

i swear everyone saying they see the blue as white are just fucking trolling. There is no way that is white. Even if you're looking at it on a damn black and white tv it wouldn't look white. There is white in the picture directly next to the dress that you can compare to. They are not the same.

The blue, is clearly in the blue area of the color spectrum. The black only has a yellow hue because of the lighting. IF ANYONE WOULD TAKE THE FUCKING TIME TO LEARN HOW LIGHTING WORKS, THIS WOULDN'T BE SUCH A FUCKING ISSUE.

>>600809785>the kind that lets you realize that lighting can make colors look faded/washed out when they actually aren't?something being "faded" or "washed out" removes color, not adds it. colors look less vibrant, not more vibrant.

look at >>600801687 again and honestly tell yourself the color on the right is "black"

>>600810445The black has a color cast due to the lighting which makes it appear brown/dark orange/pale gold/etc. I won't dispute this. The image is not properly balanced.

However, anyone who understands how color casting or global illumination works will automatically subtract the lighting's effect on the color of the dress. In doing so they will come to the conclusion that the dress is in fact black and blue.

>>600811117My eyes are super shit too, astigmatisms suck. I still see blue and black.Visual acuity and color accuracy are not intrinsic to each other.

>>600795758The image is on a screen that emits light (the screen is what you're actually seeing), therefore, what we see is an interpretation of a shadow from a white dress and gold in backlight (if you are aware of light, you search shadows).

No matter if the original dress is blue and black, people who see these colors are thinking that they are seeing the original dress, ignoring the screen light.

The dress is in direct, yellowish light and the photo was taken with a shitty camera. The light mutes the blue some, and reflects a lot off the black parts (most noticeable near the collar). The dress is, in fact, blue/black.

The people who see white/gold interpret the dress as being out of direct light. In shadow, white looks bluish. They see the yellowish light reflecting off the black parts of the dress as gold. When you think about it, though, it looks like the dress is being help up in the middle of a department store (looks like a glass display case in the back there to me), so there shouldn't be any shade to cause all that.

Evidence: http://www.slate.com/blogs/business_insider/2015/02/27/blue_and_black_or_white_and_gold_the_two_women_behind_the_dress_definitively.html>"I got to the wedding and the mother was wearing the dress," McNeill said. "Obviously it was blue and black."

Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.