“The letter from RH Corbett in the June edition of BJR (Br J Radiol 2010;83:541) should have been accompanied by the following Editorial response, which was unfortunately omitted: Dr Corbett's point is well made. This was primarily an Editorial (rather than a refereeing) oversight and we will heed his comments - Ed”.

Articles from The British Journal of Radiology are provided here courtesy of British Institute of Radiology