Comments about ‘White House e-mails blow up its Libya cover story’

Look at how many have swallowed Obama's lies, hook, line and sinker. Look
at how many are telling us that the White House had so many emails coming in
that a direct attack on one of our embassies was somehow overlooked. Look at
how many think, along with Obama, that the Americans are complete fools.

Enough is enough!

Obama lied to us. He and his
administration have tried to cover up the terrorist caused deaths of four
Americans. He and his administration either laid in their beds while we were
under attack, or they conspired to tell us that a "movie" had incited a
mob to attack our embassy.

They knew from the beginning that
TERRORISTS were attacking. They knew from the beginning that NO MOVIE was
involved. They lied to us. Some of you believe their lies. Some of you excuse
their misconduct. Some of you accept that they continued to lie to us for two
weeks after the killings. Some of you would accept anything that Obama says.

That is the whole point of the Washington Post article. He blatantly
lied and you just don't care.

Obama immediately sent his surrogate, Susan Rice, onto
the talk shows the first Sunday after the attack to claim it was the video.
Sending hench(wo)men to lie so he would not have to get too dirty, is a
particularly cowardly form of lyingI assume you are not an Ostrich -
therefore you can see it for yourself. Also; A good source is the timeline
listed in Forbes (if that is not too right-wing for you to read)

@PhrancObama has refereed to generic "acts of terror" multiple
times before and after September 11, 2012, and his story morphed as he went on
Letterman, the View and the Daily Show, but he did not specifically call Libya
an act of terror until two weeks after the event (after the video defense had
completely crumbled) One good reference is the Daily Mail Thursday, Oct 25 2012
BTW: You are not in a position to lecture about lying

@Ying
FahDoes Stephanie Cutter email you the latest talking points?Although I will offer my sympathy - it must be difficult for you to watch
"the one" self destruct (no real help from me, Mountainman or Mike
Richards required)

Are we to assume that even after two weeks, the administration did not know the
facts concerning this? Because two weeks later, they are still saying it was a
riot as the result of a video. If after two weeks they didn't know,
that's even more scary because these people must have their head in the
sand when it comes to foreign policy and events. This was a mess before and a
mess after. The difference here is plain and simple. They lied and tried to
cover up the fact that Al Queda was not dead, but still alive.

It seems that to deny terrorist activity has been a policy for some time now.

When a gunman opens fire (at a shopping mall etc) it has been hard to
ascertain his name, cultural roots and opinions etc. We are told almost
immediately that "we do not know why he did it" and even "we will
never know" (!?)

When a militant shoots fellow soldiers in the
presence of many others and there is no mystery whatsoever about the motivation
it is described as a "work related" (not a terrorist) incident. We do
our best to make it appear what it is not, and that it is not what it is.

This incident is more of the same "approach" to terrorism; as
far as possible (and even beyond perhaps) officially deny terrorism and find
very little if any. We killed one terrorism therefore terrorism is dead? No on
ould say that but I think we are meant to believe it to some extent.

@Counter IntelligenceI don't even know how one could think it
illogical that Obama was referring to the Libya attack as an act of terror when
he uses the phrase act of terror in a statement about attacks on our embassies
and consulates.

@Counter IntelligenceI don't even know how one could think it
illogical that Obama was referring to the Libya attack as an act of terror when
he uses the phrase act of terror in a statement about attacks on our embassies
and consulates.

@CIObama statements: "No Acts Of Terror Will Ever
Shake The Resolve Of This Great Nation." (9/12/2012 Rose
Garden) So what I want all of you to know is that we are
going to bring those who killed our fellow Americans to justice. I want people
around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror
will go unpunished. It will not dim the light of the values that we proudly
present to the rest of the world. No act of violence shakes the resolve of the
United States of America. (9/13/2012 Golden CO) "As
for the ones we lost last night: I want to assure you, we will bring their
killers to justice. And we want to send a message all around the world --
anybody who would do us harm: No act of terror will dim the light of the values
that we proudly shine on the rest of the world, and no act of violence will
shake the resolve of the United States of America." (9/13/2012 Las
Vegas NV)

It is despicable that Romney (and Republicans) couldn't wait to politicize
the deaths of Ambassador Stevens and other foreign officers. Americans should
come together and allow the dead the dignity and honor of their sacrifice.

These emails don't change the story at all. Reports were coming
in, data was being examined. The Pres and others spoke of acts of terror AND
the unrest across Muslim countries associated with the video. It appears so
far, the attackers in Libya took advantage of the violence/unrest in other
countires as a cover. Even if a group claims responsibility, verification is
required. It was/is a fluid situation.

Democrats just utterly fail
at sound bites and talking points. Republicans just cant't deal with
complexity and nuance, everything is a conspiracy.