The Tory Chosen Ones

Posted by Thersites on UTC 2016-06-28 10:35.

Whilst slumped in a chair yesterday waiting for the microwave to perform
its secret ministry I got myself heated up with speculations about the
malign effect of the tight central control over the selection of its
election candidates which the Conservative party has pushed through in
the course of the last decade or so.

During this time local associations, previously the backbone of solid Tory
thought among the people, have been increasingly sidelined by diktat
from Conservative Central Office. Lists of centrally approved applicants
were imposed upon the rank and file, all-women lists, 'diverse' lists
and so on. These measures were part of the 'modernisation' of the party
– 'Blairisation', if your prefer. We were told that the 'Turnip Taliban'
had no place in the modern, 'progressive' party.

Central control has serious consequences for the representation function of
MPs. If the candidates do not truly represent the interests and preferences
of their constituency what role do they play in Parliament apart from just
representing the leaders of their party?

There is a reason that there is so much anecdotal and electoral anger among the grass roots of the party.

We might expect these leadership-approved, 'modern' MPs to be
either more gratefully supine in following the party line or simply share the same
mindset as the party leaders. How loyal were they to their masters in the government-backed Remain campaign in the EU Referendum?

Hypothesis testing time

Merging Guido's list of the voting intentions of Conservative MPs in the
EU Referendum with the Wikipedia list of MPs by their first election
year produced the following table:

Entry

Remain

Leave

ND

1970

1

0

0

1974

2

0

0

1983

3

4

0

1987

2

3

0

1992

7

8

0

1997

10

13

0

2001

10

11

0

2005

33

18

0

2010

76

53

2

2015

42

31

1

Putting it graphically:

The numbers of MPs who entered Parliament before 2005 show an almost perfect 50:50
split on the issue in the EU Referendum of 2016. In contrast, those who
entered in 2005 or after show show a striking divergence.

The obvious fact is that suddenly from 2005 intake onwards there was an
appreciable majority of Conservative MPs who went on to support the official Remain
policy in the 2016 Referendum.

Whilst I would not claim that these figures 'proved' the hypothesis that
the candidates chosen under central control were either supine or
orthodox group-thinkers, there is nevertheless food for thought there.
Perhaps the central control in recent years did change the soul of the
Conservative party.

And if that is so, then if, when and whenever there is a general
election the malign CCHQ stranglehold on candidate selection has to be
relaxed so that local associations can take into account the Europhile
affinity of their applicants and select accordingly.