Hi, I have found a sample which does not sound transparent with the standard setting. "Angelic - Can't Keep Me Silent (Julian D'or mix)" from the "Eye Trance 03" trance sampler. The artifact occurs during the breakdown at ca 2:25 mins into the track. The dominant sharp synthy instrument sounds more noisy than in the original. Other words describing the artifact would be rough or coarse sounding. ABX results 8/8 (pretty easy imho). This sample also makes LAME 3.90.2 APS and OGG -q 6 stumble, allthough in a different fashion. This sound is of course purely synthetic but not uncommon in trance music.

Shit! I have problems, to depack your FLAC. I downloaded Speekīs flac-frontend, the flac-file and the codec. Put the codec into the directory, where the frontend is. And tried to decode the "angelic_silent_short" - but the dos-windows just opens for the part of a second. - What am I doing wrong?

Ok, I managed to depack it. Seems, that the frontend does not run properly on my system.

But now to the artifact. Well, I encoded the sample in all quality-steps (--q5, q6, q7, q8), but couldnīt hear any differences to the original. But, maybe my equipment or my ears are too bad. It would also be helpful, if you would give the time-stamp in the sample (in seconds from beginning), where the artifact appears. "2:25 Mins." isnīt very helpful, when the sample itself is only 14 seconds long ....

The artifact is heard during seconds 0.5 - 2.2 and 7.5 - 9.3. Sorry for not being more accurate in my first post. The 2:25 mins referr to the original song. Btw, I used flacdrop to encode the wav. I will test --xtreme or higher when I have more time.

I reached 15/19 on the insane sample where p = 1.0%, but then I pretty much lost it. Fatigue would be my excuse. Same sample for over a hundred times in 15 minutes. (Yes, I do those abx tests quick and dirty)

edit: just for kicks I also tried the old 1.7.9c encoder. Sounds similar, I would even say worse than the current 1.14 beta (without xlevel, but no clipping anyway). Of course I should abx those as well, but I'm fed up with this sample atm.

I reached 15/19 on the insane sample where p = 1.0%, but then I pretty much lost it. Fatigue would be my excuse. Same sample for over a hundred times in 15 minutes. (Yes, I do those abx tests quick and dirty)

edit: just for kicks I also tried the old 1.7.9c encoder. Sounds similar, I would even say worse than the current 1.14 beta (without xlevel, but no clipping anyway). Of course I should abx those as well, but I'm fed up with this sample atm.

Do you also tried the 1.93 encoder? Is this encoder better or worse than 1.14?

This post has been edited by Diocletian: Dec 6 2002, 15:45

--------------------

Diocletian

Time Travel Agency Book a journey to the Diocletian Palace. Not today!

1.11b, 1.14, and 1.93j all produce ABXable samplesat --insane (10/10). Transparency is achieved halfway between --quality 7 and --quality 8 with all encodedsamples. I only tested seconds 3.7-4.2 and didn't listento the whole sample.

--------------------

And if Warhol's a genius, what am I? A speck of lint on the ***** of an alien

I spent a little more time, this time I picked seconds 0.4 - 0.8 and tested with ABC/HR at --braindead. 1.11b, 1.14, and 1.93j are all ABXable (10/10). At --quality 8.5 I could not distinguish between the original and the sample encoded by 1.11b at all. With 1.14 and 1.93j I scored 7/10... This is my limit.

I was curious to see how both SV7 encoders handle the part I tested. mppenc 1.11 goes as high as 666.1 kbps for the short segment slightly after 0.5 seconds. mppenc 1.14 allocates 655.4 kb (both at --quality 8.5). What I can hear in all samples at --quality 8 and below is a change of amplitude in the right channel. Right when the synth hit plays, there's a change in modulation and a very slight change in amplitude. At --quality 8.5 it's extremely hard to notice, especially with 1.11b.

Headphones: Sennheiser HD495. Card: Diamond Monster MX400.

I hope Frank can learn something from this report.

--------------------

And if Warhol's a genius, what am I? A speck of lint on the ***** of an alien