On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:31:37 -0700, Michael Vanier wrote:
>
> Do you know if there is any performance cost to using e.g. U.f
> instead of Unix.f? I wouldn't think so.
The generated assembly code (ocamlopt -S) is not exactly the same but
my take is that the speed difference, if any, is negligible.
Regards,
ChriS