Pool G - Most Significant Strikes Landed (excluding main and co-main)Bubbles - BrennemanBudge - BispingPoorFranklin - Dunham(*I will be using the stats provided by fightmetric.com unless someone has a reason not to*)

Bubbles »
Posted 10/20/09 3:33:00PM

since we all lost $ for Pool F, is it voided or do I win for losing the least?

_______________________________________The best cure for insomnia is a lot of sex. Even if it doesn't end up putting you to sleep, you don't mind so much

Men be careful, female sexual predators are using a date rape drug called a Blowjob to trap men into scams called relationships.

trevail »
Posted 9/16/10 6:44:00PM

I took it as whoever picked the fighter landing the most sig strikes, not actually the person who picked the fighter out of the entire card that picked the most......guess we should have clarified. Budge and Poor?

Budgellism »
Posted 4/8/07 11:45:00AM

Posted by trevail

I took it as whoever picked the fighter landing the most sig strikes, not actually the person who picked the fighter out of the entire card that picked the most......guess we should have clarified. Budge and Poor?

The way I meant when I made the pool was whoever picked the guy with the most sig strikes wins. Not the guy who had the most on the entire card. Dunham had 160 or something so P_F wins even though TJ Grant actually had the most sig strikes.

Does that make sense? The words seem a little jumbled reading them out loud.

_______________________________________

Budgellism »
Posted 4/8/07 11:45:00AM

Posted by Budgellism

Posted by trevail

I took it as whoever picked the fighter landing the most sig strikes, not actually the person who picked the fighter out of the entire card that picked the most......guess we should have clarified. Budge and Poor?

The way I meant when I made the pool was whoever picked the guy with the most sig strikes wins. Not the guy who had the most on the entire card. Dunham had 160 or something so P_F wins even though TJ Grant actually had the most sig strikes.

Does that make sense? The words seem a little jumbled reading them out loud.

I just realized Bubbs wasn't even talking about this pool. He's talking about the wager percentage pool.

_______________________________________

Poor_Franklin »
Posted 6/7/11 4:52:00AM

Posted by Budgellism

Posted by trevail

I took it as whoever picked the fighter landing the most sig strikes, not actually the person who picked the fighter out of the entire card that picked the most......guess we should have clarified. Budge and Poor?

The way I meant when I made the pool was whoever picked the guy with the most sig strikes wins. Not the guy who had the most on the entire card. Dunham had 160 or something so P_F wins even though TJ Grant actually had the most sig strikes.

Does that make sense? The words seem a little jumbled reading them out loud.

i thought we were trying to pick the person on the card who landed the most significant strikes, not the most out of whoever was picked in the pool. if no one got the right answer & we were all under the same impression, we should null all bets for that pool, correct?

since it's weird to describe & words are jumbled i will clarify my personal interpretation, then let you guys figure out what we'll do

example:Budge picks Fighter ARay picks Fighter BPF picks fighter C

results: Fighter X lands the most significant strikes at UFC 152

since no one in the pool picked Fighter X, no one wins

_______________________________________Never Trust A Man Who Does Not Make All Of His Picks

trevail »
Posted 9/16/10 6:44:00PM

Well its not fair if there is controversy so I say both Pools F and G are void this time around, and we will strive to be clearer in the future. Ill post the results of the pools but no money will be awarded/lost...