From ...
From: Erik Naggum
Subject: Re: ISO on Common (was: ISO/IEC CD 13816 -- ISLisp)
Date: 1995/12/22
Message-ID: <19951222T011429Z_-_@arcana.naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 122472532
references: <19951126T160911Z@naggum.no> <49a79n$p2q@cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu> <4b9o38$6rl@info.epfl.ch>
supersedes: <19951222T001155Z@arcana.naggum.no>
organization: Naggum Software; +47 2295 0313
newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
[Fernando D. Mato Mira]
| What hurdles, if any, exist to implement ISO Lisp as a thin layer
| of macrology on top of Common Lisp?
I see this as implying that it would be desirable to have a Common Lisp
package that implemented ISLisp.
if I may stretch the idea, I think one should _define_ International
Standard Lisp as a package that can be referenced in existing Lisp systems
(probably several, not just the _standard_ ones). this is not a trivial
exercise, but keeping with the spirit of the Norwegian suggestion (mine,
actually, although it was not as new in the real world as it was to ISO
--
suppose we actually were immortal...
what is the opposite of living your life as if every day were your last?