Greg Elin wrote:
> 2) It is much easier to work with RDF if you stop worrying about
> parsing it or using it as your fundamental storage format of data. In
> other words, the fastest way to begin working with RDF is to
> additionally translate your data structures into RDF even if your
> system isn't prepared to *read* RDF. This makes your tool available to
> services/apps that CAN read the RDF and gets you in the game sort of
> speak.
>
That has also been my experience. And I think it reflects one of the
fundamental goals of the w3photo project, namely to facilitate RDF
annotation and thus provide a repository of data and metadata for future
people to experiment with in developing applications that *do* something
with the data/metadata.
I've got lots of ideas for cool ways to manipulate the metadata I'm
collecting in my own project, but currently I'm just gathering the data
and metadata. Hey, I figure I've still got a good 9 years left to figure
all that out...
--bryce
==================================
This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.
Subscribe Instructions
To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: subscribe
Unsubscribe Instructions
To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: unsubscribe
Help
To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: help