Stories from the trenches, by a fictional hiring partner at a large law firm in a major city.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

A reader pointed me to a Slate article about one of our competitor firms and its program, "Chow For Charity." Under the program, if a lawyer takes a summer associate for a $15 lunch instead of a $60 one, the $45 difference gets donated to Legal Aid. The Slate piece takes the attitude that it's absurd for the firm to have the attitude that a $15 lunch is a sacrifice, and pathetic for the firm to trumpet a program that will end up donating practically nothing to charity, as compared to the profits the firm makes.

Obviously, I have a somewhat different take on the whole thing. First, I'm sick and tired of law firms feeling like we have to apologize for what we do and the money we make. No one forces our clients to choose us, and if we were charging more money than the market could bear we would go bankrupt. There's no shame in being good at what you do, and there's certainly no shame in getting paid for it. Donating our money to Legal Aid organizations just perpetuates the stigma that's unfairly been attached to making money. Law students have been brainwashed into viewing their ultimate employment decision as an either/or choice between money/evil/capitalism and poverty/goodness/sacrifice. Having summer associates make a "sacrifice" at their evil law firm jobs only adds to the false guilt the Public Interest Mafia imposes on them.

Every school has these people, the "good" law students who would never think of "selling out" and working for a firm. And who make everyone who just wants to pay off their loans and live a comfortable life in a gated suburban community feel like they're subhuman. When in reality, 90% of the public interest-minded students end up picking a firm anyway, and the other 10% can't get hired. Doing public interest work isn't a "choice" that any rational law student makes, it's the last resort, the place they go when a firm won't hire them.

Or they're irrational. Because "public interest" is no less "evil" than we are, they just have a better propaganda machine. We put our propaganda money into $60 lunches instead.

But when a firm announces they're letting students make this "sacrifice" and donate money to the enemy, it just legitimizes their claim that they're "better" than we are. And it sickens me. $60 lunches are not something we should be ashamed of. They're a bonus. A selling point. Something we should stand up and cheer, something we should be proud of. We can afford $60 lunches for our useless summer associates, who get paid absurd amounts of money in the first place, for doing busy-work and going to parties. It's lavish and wasteful and decadent... and I'm proud of it because it shows the world we are good at what we do and we have money to burn. But we've earned it. And screw whoever wants to try and take away the money we've rightfully earned and give it to the people who spend all their energy trying to bring us down and make us feel guilty for the lives we lead.

I'm starting a new program here. For every dollar someone goes over the $60 lunch limit, we take that money out of our yearly charitable contribution fund. It's called "Eat The Poor." See how they like that one. We can fight fire with fire here. I won't lie down for Legal Aid. Not in this lifetime.

I am just loving your book, Anonymous Lawyer, I have not yet finished it but will probably do so in the next day. I stumbled across your blog here, and I am amazed you are still writing in character! This is the official blog, is it not? I have no idea...

Once I finish the book I will have to go through all the back posts and have a good read.

Your style of writing is so easy to read, amusing and it hooks you right in.

Public interest work is for those who got paid to go to law school, and don't have to spend years of their life paying off hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of debt. They can afford to take a job which 1) pays as much as a small firm or government job; 2) requires a maximum of 45 dollars a week; 3) lets them work in an evironment where they never have to be berated by an exhausted associate who has been berated by a rich ass partner who was himself bitched out by a selfish client.

Basically, you wish you were smart enough to make legal aid an option for you. I'll be thinking of you next year when you graduate, and I can spend my nights and weekends with my friends, while you have to spend them at the office.

Satire or not, a valid point is made: We live in a society where making as much money as possible is expected, if not viewed as a moral imperative. But somehow, lawyers get singled out as being "greedy [or insert favorite laywer putdown]" and immoral because they too, are interested in making money.

I recall that at the large firm I summered at every weekly meeting much ado was made over doing service to the community and doing pro bono. When I wasn't extended an offer, one of the reasons given was that I didn't go to the "spend a day at a homeless shelter feeding bums" function; instead, I spent all day actually working.

I really despise these large firms who make such a bogus PR effort to show they are "giving back" to the community by their pro bono work. Of course, pro bono counts only if you are representing some dirtbag prisoner in a civil rights lawsuit because he didn't get fed because he wouldn't put his pants on. It doesn't count if you want to help out the small businessman who is getting screwed by the government and can't afford to fight city hall.

The bottom line is that pro bono and all this "public service" nonsense is something only large firms do to reinforce their notions of superiority over smaller firms who can't afford to work for free or spend like Caesar

I too recall the false choice given in law school between "selling out" and "helping the poor."

Why is it "wrong" to want to work hard to pay off your loans and make money to support your family?

Also, only one end of the "publci service" sector is actually considered "public service" by our intellectual and moral superiors. If you work for the public defender representing drug dealers, rapists, and the scum of society you get laon forgiveness because you are "working for the public interest." However, if you become a city prosecutor (some of whom make 30K where I am from), put the bad guys in jail, and actually do a public service, that doesn't count because you are "working for the man." Nevermind that a number of local prosecutors just got fired for moonlighting as bartenders to pay off their loans.

I seemed to have missed the lecture on "hearts" as a 3l. Law has nothing to do with hearts. I exist to sue people and take their money and give it to my client and take a cut of it. There is nothing hearless or heartful about that. Its business, plain and simple.

You make valid points all around. What other profession allows friends, family, neighbors, acquaintances and even strangers to "pick their brains" over some issue, typically far and away removed from that lawyer's practice area? I'm asked for free advice ALL of the time, yet I would never ask my doctor, accountant or plumber for free service! I've devoted a lot of time and spent a lot of money training to be a professional in the legal field, which I find challenging and rewarding. I certainly expect to be paid for for my services. That said, I believe all lawyers do have an ethical obligation to perform pro bono work or, at minimum, financially contribute to the betterment of the judicial process if they can afford it. The program that you describe is, unfortunately, a realistic example of a poor attempt to accomplish the latter. Thanks for the thought-provoking post!

"Law has nothing to do with hearts. I exist to sue people and take their money and give it to my client and take a cut of it."

That may be the mechanical nature of what we do, but the difference is that we used to at least make the pretense of being 'professionals' (i.e. professing a set of values). If the sole purpose of our existence is to win at all costs, we cynically laugh at the notion of justice and equity, then we're no longer a profession, we're just a business. Or worse, just parasites.

Hearts may have nothing to do with it, but I went to law school too (a pretty damn good one in fact) and the trend in our profession worries me.

Maybe we could take this all public interest, public work bushtit to all fields of activities and have doctors, bus drivers, police officers, etc working for free (and for a matter or coherence, actually being criticized for that, as the greedy lawyers are). We could then call Jimmy Hendrix back from the reign of death and have Daniel Cohn-Bendit flown from France and live through Woodstock and May 68 all over again. Maybe smoke a couple of joints and wait that things get done (everything is for free anyway. Professionals don’t get paid).

PS: I liked the reference to the plumber. If a plumber fixes the toilette of a drug addict, is that public interest work? He better not dare to charge the poor drug addict for his services. The money is much needed to buy crack. Greedy plumber!

Speaking of which, drug dealers should also do public work. Free hallucinogenic drugs for everybody your greedy drug dealers! Give something back to the community! Well, that’s something that some of the authors of the above posts would certainly enjoy…

"That may be the mechanical nature of what we do, but the difference is that we used to at least make the pretense of being 'professionals' (i.e. professing a set of values). If the sole purpose of our existence is to win at all costs, we cynically laugh at the notion of justice and equity, then we're no longer a profession, we're just a business. Or worse, just parasites."

Well, that is exactly what I do. I used to belief in a set of principles and was attracted to the law because I liked the research and "discovering the law" and trying to determine how this body of power, principles, and ethics operated. Having practiced for a few years, I have realized that law is simply a bunch of arbitrary rules set up by those in power to allow or prevent one group of society from taking money from another. So yes, I "cynically laugh at the notion of justice and equity," because I am too worried about how I am going to get paid to sit back and ponder higher notions of justice and equity. Again, lawyers charging $500 an hour may have the luxury of contemplating such things whilst releiving themselves in gilded chamber pots, but the average guy "in the trenches" is just trying to make a living. Everyone has filed an appeal, or made an argument that they have not agreed with because it furthered the client's interest and you got paid for it. There is no truth, justice, equity, etc. There is only the argument. So long as you don't violate the rules of ethics, anything is fair game to help you win. At least that is the world i live in.

That's the world we all live in, Cato, but that doesn't mean the system isn't deeply flawed, or that we don't richly deserve the enmity of the general public. We are a pretty cynical bunch.

And to all the posters saying why do lawyers have to do public interest (not that alot of us do) but not other professionals... well, there's an easy answer.

Read Cato's post above. What exactly does he do for a living that has any social utility whatsoever? (Not that I'm picking on him, he's just honest enough to admit it.) Move Money from A to B. And he's so used to it that it doesn't even occur to him that what he does isn't justifiable, it ISN'T what we're supposed to be about.

Doctors save peoples' lives. Sure, there are corrupt and incompetent ones out there, but at their core what they do has social utility. I was sick, you made me better.

Even the plumbers people are deriding here do a job with social utility. Some guy who fixes my stopped-up toilet did more for his fellow man than alot of us do, especially those of us wasting our lives in an office building somewhere, making sure that some wealthy bastards stay that way.

So doctors and plumbers don't NEED to do "public interest" because their work by its nature is in the public interest.

But if we're so far removed from our ideals at this point that all we do is sneer at the reasons most of us went to law school (remember?)... then yes, we should do some free damn work for the poor, or at least give some money.

And Cato, brother, you're among your own here. If you're a few years out of school and working at a slave mill, then fine, no money and no time for pro bono. But most lawyers don't are aren't... and alot of them still don't bother.

The anonymous author of the 9.00 AM post seems to forget that the “wealthy bastards” are in fact banks, insurance companies, oil companies and other big corporations on which the economy of the world is built and eventually makes it possible for the plumber to have a job. Look no further than to the October 1929 crash or to what happened in Argentina a few years ago and you’ll maybe understand that there are more socially useful professions besides the farmer that grows our food and the doctors that save our lives.

Big firm pro bono-makes me puke. I practice criminal defense in a southern state. In 2000, I had a case that got a fair amount of publicity. My client in that case was a decent guy who really got hosed. A guy from a big DC firm sent some glossy brochure about their big commitment to the tired, hungry, poor and smelly, and offered to help. I thanked him, but said I thought I had enough help already, but if the firm was not too busy, I had a death penalty trial coming up and could sure use a couple of nerds(ok, associates) to assist my co-counsel andI. Sound of deafening silence, don't you know.

"The anonymous author of the 9.00 AM post seems to forget that the “wealthy bastards” are in fact banks, insurance companies, oil companies and other big corporations on which the economy of the world is built and eventually makes it possible for the plumber to have a job. Look no further than to the October 1929 crash or to what happened in Argentina a few years ago and you’ll maybe understand that there are more socially useful professions besides the farmer that grows our food and the doctors that save our lives."

Says Mr. Anonymous.

If you're a corporate lawyer, and you think what you do is socially useful, you're fucking fooling yourself.

And do you really think that the big benevolent corporations make it possible for the plumber and the farmer to have their jobs? Is that what you really think?

The only way that's possible is if Rupert Murdoch has a monopoly on clogged shitters.

Certainly setting up LLCs, and making wills and that sort of thing is "useful" to people, and so are litigators. However, all too often, all we do is drive up the cost of doing everything, with no real net benefit to our clients.

I fully realize this profession is a jok and that the only successful attorneys are those who can sell their soul and have no qualms about it.

I honestly don’t care if what I do is socially useful or not. What I know and care about is that I live a big house, drive a Porsche and am able to provide for my family. If you don’t like it, it’s your problem. There is nothing you can do about it (however sick you may be of what you call bullshit) and corporate lawyers at big law will keep making big bucks. I also don’t recognize you (or anyone else for that matter) any moral superiority to lecture me, corporate lawyers or any other professional and I don’t feel I have to apologize for having a high income. The taxes I pay (which are a direct consequence of my income) make more for the public interest that your inflamed speeches.

Despite this, I really do think that your perspective that corporations and lawyers are useless is unintelligent and futile. You are, however, entitled to it and have every right to defend it.

"I fully realize this profession is a jok and that the only successful attorneys are those who can sell their soul and have no qualms about it."

That's all I'm saying; be honest. I'm not judging who is a better person, but if we spit on equity and all that, and idolize money and money only, let's just say so: It's just about the money, and that's it.

What bothers me is how we all still pay lip service to this ideal that is long dead; that law is a "profession" anymore that like medicine still is. As I said before, we're now just a business.

And no one is going to convince me that lawyers don't like to have their cake and eat it too. We like to make money and screw anybody who gets in the way, but we still all like to walk around like we're somehow "above" other working stiffs. Look at the way we still sprinkle our pleadings with archaic Latin terminology. Or the way we kow-tow to judges, like they're arbiters of divine justice. (Oh, sorry, I forgot I was adressing corporate lawyers who've never seen a courtroom. Judges wear black robes and scowl alot.)

"I honestly don’t care if what I do is socially useful or not. What I know and care about is that I live a big house, drive a Porsche and am able to provide for my family."

Hey, whatever floats your boat. But you're not a "professional", not in the way I understand the word. Not that you care, but I do. And I'm sick of us doing what we do, day in and day out, and acting like we're not at this point just a bunch of mercenaries.

"Despite this, I really do think that your perspective that corporations and lawyers are useless is unintelligent and futile."

See, you're not even listening to what I'm saying.

Many lawyers (not you, but many others) actually do alot of good out there. Unlike you, they give a shit. And corporations are massively important to the economy, and without them I personally would not be able to enjoy the standard of living I enjoy.

But there's a certain honesty with business and businesspeople. Up front, everyone knows it's about the bottom line and maximizing profit.

That's honest. That's reasonable. We're hypocrites, because we're also about the bottom line, but we still want to believe that we're a "profession," i.e. that we profess a set of ideals.

We don't, or at least enough of us think like you so that most of us don't.

And you DO care about that, and it DOES bother you, otherwise you wouldn't feel the need to defend your position to an anonymous blogger on a website. If it really didn't matter to you, you wouldn't have bothered.

“And you DO care about that, and it DOES bother you, otherwise you wouldn't feel the need to defend your position to an anonymous blogger on a website. If it really didn't matter to you, you wouldn't have bothered.”

No. That’s not it. What actually bothers me is your feeling of moral superiority based on the type of law you practice. What bothers me is that you think you’re better than me because you do civil rights litigation instead of M&A.

"No. That’s not it. What actually bothers me is your feeling of moral superiority based on the type of law you practice. What bothers me is that you think you’re better than me because you do civil rights litigation instead of M&A."

I'm not the poster above you working in public interest, god bless her.

I'm an old fart whose been in this business for too long, and I've never worked for Legal Aid or any of those people.

And you know what? I implicate myself just as much as you, so cut the crap.

I freely admit the shit I've done is part of the problem. I'M part of the problem, and it's getting hard to live with myself. Why do you think I'm so pissed? 'Cause I've wasted time I'll never get back, chasing Mammon.

I went to law school thinking I was going to be public interest, because I was a naive lib arts douche without a clue, and like everyone else, by the time I got out, I was caring about things I never cared about before. And I spent YEARS chasing them. It wasn't until recently that I realized what a waste it's been.

No, I'm not going to tell you who I am or where I've worked. It's none of your damn business, and it doesn't detract from what I'm saying.

Cato raised a good point above; we're not EVEN a business, because a business produces a product that people use and gain utility from. The core of what they do is to maximize profit and minimize waste, while delivering a product or service from which the public hopefully derives some benefit.

We (I) have spent countless deals watching all the motions and discovery jack up the costs prohibitively, creating nothing BUT waste. I don't even blame deal-makers anymore for just trying to shake on it, not that that's remotely possible.

So forgive me for being harsh on you, but we're much less dissimilar than you'd be comfortable with if you really knew, I'm sure.

Whether (or when) you figure this all out is your business. But it's still true regardless.

The business aspect of the profession is the one thing I wish law school had actually covered.

I didn't go into the law as a lefty public interest person. I went in as someone who should have gotten a phd in philosophy, but I wanted to be able to eat.

I loved law school and loved clerking afterwards, but really despise the day to day practice. Sure, I help people, and that is a little satisfying.

But the comment made above about being mercenaries is a apt one. Last month in two seperate cases, I had to argue both sides of the same issue (different clients/different judge).

What really bothers me is having to make "financial decisions" about how much time and energy to put into a case.

I am by nature a perfectionist, but I cannot justify being an A+ job on a case where the client doesn't want to pay for it. On the other hand, I feel horrible knowing I could do a better job on a matter but can't because the client is not willing to pay for it. I might as well put in my fee agreement: "For X amount, I am willing to provide average legal services."

While we as lawyers do not usually "produce" anything tangible, we are suppossed to be a service profession. However, instead of serving the legal needs of our clients, we all wind up serving the billable hour requirement of our partners.

It doesn't matter whether I win or lose a motion, or whether after hours of research I found the correct answer on a very technical point of law. All that matters is whether I can bill for it. Who cares if the client's position is only marginally legitimate, so long as he's paying, I will do it.

I'm left with my hands tied on the really interesting cases b/c a client can't/won't pay, and on the other hand I am forced to argue every conceiveable point on the loser cases simply because the client will pay for it.

Hahaha good post. I work at a firm and my wife is in public interest. I've never understood the animosity public interest folks have for us. We certainly don't have any hard feelings for them. You would think that with all of the yoga classes they attend during work hours and all of the pot they smoke, the would be more laid back. Instead, they're far more uptight than those of us who work down in the salt mines. Ah the benefits of helping our greedy, uneducated, ungrateful public. I would take my own dirtbag clients over my wife's client's any day of the week.

It seems to me that in our profession, we are privy to a view of the law and justice that the general public cannot have. i find that to be the reason we have this almost jaded perspective of equity and justice. People want us to help them for free because they view all law related issues the same. They think that since they can call the police (call the law, as they say) and expect aid without a bill, that the whole system works that way. This kind of flawed mentality is why they are in trouble in the first place.

"What other profession allows friends, family, neighbors, acquaintances and even strangers to "pick their brains" over some issue, typically far and away removed from that lawyer's practice area? I'm asked for free advice ALL of the time, yet I would never ask my doctor, accountant or plumber for free service!"

Actually, most other professions are asked for free advice. Law is very much not unique in this case (and many others, of course, though some folks here seem to forget that, and that does come off as arrogance). Don't we all tend to ask questions of those close to us who are perceived as having the valid answers, be they a friend, family member, neighbor, etc? When you have an eye infection and don't know if you should go to the doctor, you ask your doctor friend for advice. If you can't think of one time you have asked a friend for advice when you have problems with or questions about something even vaguely in their field, I'd be very surprised.

"Eat the Poor." Bravo! Why, in this country, do we have to idolize and coddle the lowest common denominator? I spent my first law school summer working "public interest." A bunch of so-called "lawyers" soliciting donations on the telephone and worrying where their next paycheck would come from. When they weren't whining about how they couldn't afford to pay back their law school loans, they were avoiding calls from their nasty, "poor and deserving" clients. It reminded me why I went to law school in the first place: to be part of the problem. Pays better.

It's bad enough the government feels it has the right to tax a higher portion of our income because we earn more. That means I spend more time in my day working for the government than a waitress, teacher, or anyone who gets to work a 40 hour week and keep more of what they earn. Politicians don't work for free! And while politicans are buying themselves lavish office furniture and $400 toilet seats with my tax dollars, they have the gall to ask me to donate even more of my time to "help the poor."

Ohhhhh, you’re American! Well well well… whatever you think of public interest lawyers, is exactly what the rest of the world thinks of Americans. I'd say its a little something like this, Self-centered fuckwits living on borrowed time. “Welcome to the real world kiddies?” Welcome to the real America you mean. The real WORLD hates you, and if you had any comprehension of that, and why exactly (crap like this), you wouldn’t leave the house. Sorry, the McMansion.

As this is a "fake" law blog, I'm just commenting on the comments... Contrary to what is being posted on here, not everyone who goes into public interest law is from a wealthy upbringing or had their law school tuition paid for. My family is blue collar (my dad is an auto body repairman), my parents can't afford to give me one cent for school, and my tuition is less than 50% at a 45K law school.But I came here with a goal and I'm standing by that. I think it is mental laziness and a cop-out when my fellow students convince themselves that "the loans are just too much" and "unless you're independently wealthy, you can't do public interest." This is just the way people rationalize their decisions to themselves.If the cause you're fighting for is really that important to you (and money isn't) then you can get by, especially with loan forgiveness programs that many schools offer. A lot of schools offer a base salary of 40K (or more), under which you never have to pay a cent of loans.Taking a lower salary is a hardship, for sure. But it is not impossible. It is a sacrifice that you make in order to "live in good faith". Do the future corporate lawyers of the world really think that substantial sacrifices will not be required of them? You will sacrifice your time, your family life, your energy, and possibly even your health (to stress related diseases). If you're someone who feels pulled toward public service and instead takes a job for the salary, you may sacrifice something beyond all of that: your mental health and happiness. But you WILL get a higher salary. Everything requires sacrifices. Choose one or choose the other.Public interest people do deserve to have some moral superiority, though: we do things out of principle, not because we're motivated by money. If nothing else, we are dedicated and principled. The clients that a public defender takes don't commit crimes that are any more heinous than the ones that a high priced defense firm would take. They're different in only one way: the public defender does not get paid nearly as much. She is motivated by principle. She may loathe the client, but she defends him because everyone deserves a zealous advocate. The firm lawyer, however, may loathe her client, but she defends him because... the firm has to make money, she has to make money, and this client has money to pay. Who you represent is not the important part- WHY you represent that person is.If money is your god, then that's fine. But when you make that choice, you've surrendered the moral high ground. "Money is the root of all evil." "It's easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven." Perhaps these sayings are symptomatic of a schizophrenic society - torn between Christian morals (which DEMAND a vow of poverty) and Capitalist advertising and consumption (I, personally, think we should chuck both systems out, but that's just me...). Either way, I don't think you can be primarily motivated by the bottom line and still claim any kind of moral high ground (or even equal ground).And as for the person who claimed the public interest lawyers are lazy....most public interest lawyers are in understaffed offices with far less monetary motivation and far less resources. They may employ two lawyers to do the same amount of work as four firm lawyers would do. I worked in a small, local office for a well known national nonprofit, and the lawyers busted their asses (with the help of two legal interns and a host of volunteers). They work hard because there are only two of them and hundreds of requests for action pour in each month. Public interest lawyers, in my experience, are NOT lazy.

MY NAME IS DANIEL PAVON CUELLAR, MY SON SEBASTIAN PAVON CUELLAR, WHO CARRIES BOTH OF MY LAST NAMES ONLY, BECAUSE THE MOTHER SAMANTHA LOWRY DID NOT WANTED HIM.

ON MAY 17, SHE MOVED OUT OF THE HOUSE FOR NO REASON, TAKING MY SON, AND REFUSING ME TO LET ME SEE HIM.

FROM HER NEGLIGENCE, LACK OF MEDICAL ATTENTION, PLACING THE LIFE OF SEB AT RISK AND REFUSE TO LET ME TAKE HIM TO THE DOCTOR, I TOOK HIM TO MEXICO (MAY 25, NO CUSTODY ORDERS, NO PROCEEDINGS, NO WARRANTS, NOT EVEN ATTORNEYS INVOLVED ),TO GIVE HIM MEDICAL ATTENTION, SHE WAS TO ARRIVE THREE DAYS LATER(AND EVEN GIVED HER 2000 FOR HER TRIP), BUT SHE CLAIMED SHE FELL ILL, AND SHE SAID SHE WILL ARRIVE AGAIN, BUT FAILED TO, AT THAT TIME, I ASKED HER SEVERAL TIMES FOR OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS SHE HAD STOLEN TO BE SENT TO US, AND FOR US TO BE ABLE TO RETURN TO THE U.S., BUT ALSO SHE REFUSED.

AFTER HER CONTINOUS HARRASMENT TO MY FAMILY AND FRIENDS, I WENT TO LAREDO WITH MY SON, AND TOLD HER TO MEET US THERE OR SEND SOMEONE WITH OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS TO GET INTO THE U.S, BUT NOT ONLY SHE DID NOT SHOW UP, BUT WHEN SHE KNEW SHE WILL NOT BE THERE, SHE DID NOT TELL ME, AND I HAD TO GO ALL THE WAY TO LAREDO AND BACK WITH MY SON, FOR NOTHING. ( NO CONCERN FOR SEB)

SHE HAD THREATEN MANY TIMES TO TAKE MY SON TO ENGLAND WITHOUT ME (MAY 25 THE SISTERS WERE ARRIVING AND SHE SAID IT WAS FOR THE PURPOSE TO TAKE HIM AND SINCE SHE HAD ALL OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS, THEREWAS NOTHING I COULD DO, (TAKE HIM TO HER MOTHERS CHILD NURSERY AND WERE THE BROTHER WAS ACCUSED OF SEXUAL ABUSE TO A CHILD )BUT ALSO THE FACT WAS, SHE WAS SEEN AN ATTORNEY SINCE BEFORE MAY 14 WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE, AND SHE STARTED COURT PROCEEDINGS AFTER I LEFT WITHOUT LETING ME KNOW AND WITHOUT SERVICE OF ANY KIND,(JOE D MILNER EVEN COMMITTED PERJURY IN ALTERNATIVE PROOF OF SERVICE AND CREATING A DIFERENT EMAIL ADDRESS WHICH IS NOT MYNE AND HAD NEVER BEEN, BUT FOR THE PURPOSE FOR ME TO NOT KNOW ABOUT THE COURT PROCEEDINGS, )AS WELL AS FILED AN ARREST WARRANT OF CHILD ENDANGEREMENT(MAY 30) (I DID NOT KNOW UNTIL MUCH LATER) AGAINST ME, CLAIMING SEBASTIAN WAS ALLERGIC TO FORMULA AND COULD DIE IN 48 TO 72 HOURS. YET, SHE DID NOT SHOW UP, OR SEND OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS, AND FALIED TO MEET US AT LAREDO, (AND AS PER HER LIES), SHE WANTED SEBASTIAN DEAD.....

SINCE I REALISED SHE WAS NOT COMING, I WAS DOING ALL I COULD TO RETURN,AND ASKING FOR OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS TO BE ABLE TO RETURN, (I HAVE UP TO DATE NOT A SINGLE DOCUMENTS OF SEB AND NOT EVEN A VALID ID FOR ME, AND SINCE ALL MY DOCUMENTS ARE IN MY HOMESTEAD, I HAVE NO WAY TO OBTAIN ANY.) BUT HER, HER ATTORNEYS, AND AS SHE CLAIMS, THE FBI AND POLICE, WAS DOING ALL TO BLOCK OUR RETURN, AND NOT BE HEARD IN COURT. THEN, THEY COULD STEAL EVERYTHING FREELY.

SHE STARTED HARRASING FRIENDS, FAMILY AND MY PARENTS NON STOP, EVEN THREATS OF FELONY CHARGES TO WHOEVER WOULD HELP ME, AFTER RECEIVING AN EMAIL FROM HER ATTORNEY JAMI MILNER CLAIMING I HAD ANOTHER ARREST WARRANT , NOW FOR PARENTAL KIDNAPPING (JUNE 8,)BUT I REALISE NOW, IT WAS A LIE, NO WARRANT WAS ISSUED,IT WAS THEIR PLAN TO BLOCK MY RETURN, SPECIALLY AFTER MY INSISTANCE OF RETURN AND RIGHT AFTER I RETURN FROM LAREDO. BUT WHILE NEGOCIATING, THEY WERE WORKING TO ISSUE THE REAL ONE ON JUNE 18, THE NEXT DAY I WAS SERVED WITH THE FIRST SUIT ! (JUNE 19)

I LEFT MY PARENTS HOUSE FOR HER TO STOP HARRASING THEM (ON JUNE 9), AND TOLD HER, I WAS LEAVING, THAT SAME DAY SHE WHEN SHE KNEW I WAS NO LONGER THERE, SHE SEND A FED EX TO MY PARENTS FULL OF LIES, AND USING THE NAME OF THE ATTORNEYS FIRM IN THE ENVELOP(BUT ALSO BEEN A LIE) SAME THAT CAUSED THE HEART ATTACK TO MY 70 YEAR OLD MOTHER (SHE KNEW SHE HAD A HEART CONDITION)AND THIS HAPPENED AS SOON AS I ARRIVED FROM LAREDO . WITH TWO ATTEMPTS TO TRY TO KILL MY MOTHER , SINCE I AM AN INHERITOR TO HER PROPERTIES.BUT HER PLAN FAILED TO KILL MY MOTHER, THEN SHE JUST CLAIMED HER PROPERTIES WERE MYNE, AS WELL AS MY PARENTS BANK ACCOUNT WITH MULTIPLE PERJURY IN COURT, AND THEIR ASSURANCE I COULD NOT RETURN, NOT BE HEARD, AND NOT BE PRESENT IN COURT

MY LAST YEAR INCOME WAS 20 000 FROM THE SALE OF 4 PAINTINGS, AND WE EVEN HAD TO USE GOVERNEMENT HELP FOR THE HOSPITAL BILL SINCE WE COULD NOT AFFORD IT.

WHILE THEN, SHE GOT THE HELP FROM MEG MUNN (U.K PARLIAMENT), TO GET INFLUENCE IN MEXICO, AND GOT ALL THE WAY TO TONY BLAIR, BY DOING SO, SHE GOT INFLUENCE IN THE U.S. AND MEXICO, AND WITH HER LIES, MANIPULATED EVERYONE, TO DO ALL TYPES OF ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING RAIDS, (ONE WITHOUT ANY RECORD ANYWHERE AGAINST MY PARENTS HOME AND FOR NO REASON, SINCE SHE KNEW I WAS IN VERACRUZ, BUT SHE ADMITTED SENDING IT, AND AFTER SHE KNEW SHE HAD CAUSED MY MOTHER A HEART ATTACK ALREADY,(MURDER ATTEMPT)) BUT WITH THE WHOLE INTENT TO KILL HER.

TO MAKE SURE I WILL NOT SEND SOMEONE TO GET OLD TRAVEL DOCUMENTS FROM MY HOMESTEAD, EVEN IF SHE WAS NOT LIVING THERE, SHE BROKE VIOLENTLY THROUGHT A LARGE WINDOW, AND WITH THE HELP OF HER POLICE DETECTIVE FRIEND ANDREW WESTBROOK, PLACED HER AND A TOTAL OF 8 PEOPLE INCLUDING UNKNOWN MAN, IN MY HOUSE, LATER THE MILNER FIRM, GOT A COURT ORDER TO GIVE HER EXCLUSIVE USE OF MY HOUSE(HOMESTAED) AND RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST ME AND EVERYONE RELATED IN ANY WAY TO ME,THEN, I COULD NO LONGER EVEN SEND SOMEONE TO GET DOCUMENTS OR ANYTHING FROM MY HOUSE TO TRY TO OBTAIN TRAVEL DOCUMENTS HERE, WHILE THEY STARTED STEALING EVERYTHING, AND STEAL THE DOCUMENTS OF MY PARENTS FOR THE FRAUD, AS WELL AS STEALING MY PARENTS PO BOX KEY TO STEAL THEIR MAIL .

WITHOUT BEEN ABLE TO RETURN, WITHOUT BEEN ABLE TO BE HEARD IN COURT,AND A JUDGE WHO WILL SIGN ANYTHING THEY WANTED, THE COURT APPARENTLY AWARD THEM : 1) ONE MILLION AGAINST MY MOTHERS PROPERTIES(WORTH AT LEAST 3 MILLION), 2) THE SALE OF MY HOMESTEAD, 3) THE SALE (AND THEFT)OF ALL MY LIFES WORK OF ART BEEN 1732 (1200 STOLEN BEFORE THE COURT ORDER)INCLUDING ALL THE ONES IN DAPACU.COM AND WORTH AT LEAST 4000USD EACH. FOR THE SMALL ONES.4) THE BANK ACCOUNT OF MY PARENTS,5) ALL THEIR ATTORNEYS FEES (IN EXCEES OF SIX FIGURES) 6) FULL CUSTODY OF MY SON, TO BE TAKEN TO THE UNITED KINGDOM OR NORTHERN IRELAND, AND 7) 3700 A MONTH IN CHILD SUPPORT (ONLY 300 WAS FOR CHILD SUPPORT AND WITHOUT HAVING SEB BUT PAYABLE SINCE JULY 1)

AND ALL OF IT, ALL THE WARRANTS ALL THE COURTS, ALL PROCEEDINGS, ALL ORDERS, MADE ILLEGALLY AFTER I LEFT. AND WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE UNTIL JUNE 19 OR MY RIGHT TO BE HEARD.

SAMANTHA LOWRY DID NOT EVEN ASK FOR SEBASTIAN IN 72 DAYS, EXCEPT FOR ONE TIME WHEN I ASKED HER, WHY YOU DONT EVEN ASK ABOUT HIM !

NOW THEY ARE IN A VERY TOUGH PLACE, THEY HAVE COMMITTED ALL TYPES OF CRIMES AGAINST ME AND MY FAMILY, INCLUDING A HUGE FRAUD FOR MONETARY GAIN, BUT ALSO, SAMANTHA AND HER FAMILY ARE (OR WERE) IN HEAVY DEBT, AND EVEN WITH THE POSSIBLITY OF LOSING THEIR HOME IN BISHOPSTONE BEFORE ALL THIS STARTED.

IF I COULD RETURN, THEY WILL FACE CHARGES AGAINST THEIR CRIMES, A HUGE LAWSUIT, AND THEY WILL HAVE TO PAY THEIR ATTORNEYS FEES.

SO UP TO DATE, SHE HAS NOT SEND OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS, AND TRYING ALL FOR ME TO NOT RETURN, OR ANYONE OF MY FAMILY WHO EVEN IF THEY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ME IN ANY WAY OR WITH MY SON, BY HER LIES, THEY ALL BEEN HARRASED.

I HIRED TWO ATTORNEYS, ONE SIMPLY STOLEN THE MONEY (ANTONIO WEHNES), THE OTHER ONE STARTED WORKING ON MILNERS BEHALF (WITH PLENTY OF EVIDENCE TO PROVE IT)HEIDI HEINDRICH

THE MILNER FIRM ALSO FACES FRAUD CHARGES, AND THE POLICE DETECTIVE ANDREW WESTBROOK, I CAN PROVE HE COMMITTED PERJURY TO ISSUE THE WARRANT.

FOR MEG MUNN AND ANNE SNELGROVE, FROM THE U.K. PARLIAMENT WHO HELPED THE LOWRY MOB, ALSO DO NOT WANT THE TRUTH TO BE HEARD, IT WILL BE SUCH A SHAME FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM GOVERMENT THEY HAVE HELP TO COMMIT SUCH A HUGE FRAUD.AND NOW, NOT EVEN THE NEWS WANT TO MAKE THIS PUBLIC.

SO WHILE WE RUN FOR OUR LIFES, THEY CONTINUE TO TRY TO STEAL EVERYTHING, AND FIND A WAY TO SHUT ME UP FROM EXPOSING THE TRUTH.

ALL THIS CRIMES AND THE FRAUD, AS WELL AS MANY OTHERS, HAVE BEEN REPORTED TO THE POLICE, SECRET SERVICE, FBI,TO JUDGE DIETZ, (THE MAIN JUDGE WHO SIGNED ALL THE ILLEGAL ORDERS), AND MANY OTHER ENTITIES, BUT UP TO DATE, NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE.SAMANTHA LOWRY IN A RECENT EMAIL, NOTIFYING ME SHE WILL SELL ALL THE PROPERTIES, SHE SIGNEDIDOMINABILITYSAMANTHA LOWRY AND THE MOBMY QUESTIONS ARE MANY ! WHY WOULD THE FBI, POLICE, AND PARLIAMENT HELP THE MOB ? DID SHE SAID SHE DI NOT WANT THE BABY TO HAVE MY LAST NAMES TO NOT CARRY HERS, AND MAYBE SELL HIM OR USE HIM FOR OTHER PURPOSES ? ANOTHER PERSON INVOLVED IN THIS IS BOB GLOYD, WHO HELP PREGNANT WOMAN IN NEED AND WITHOUT MONEY, BUT ALSO DIRECTOR OF COMPUTER ENGENIRING FOR UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AND PROBABLY THE ONE BLOCKING MY EMAILS, SINCE AFTER ALL, SAMANTHA HAS ALL THE EMAILS ADDRESSES , EVEN SOME I HAD SECRETLY FOR THEM NOT TO BE BLOCKED.

AND EVEN IF ALL OF THIS IS HAPPENING IN AUSTIN, TEXAS, THEY HAVE AN ATTORNEY AS WELL FROM NEW YORK, JEREMEY MORLEY, MAKING OBVIOUS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME, REASON THEY ARE EXPERST AT THIS CRIMES.

WHAT IS SCARY, IS, THEY WANT TO SILENCE ME IN ANYWAY THEY CAN, FOR ME NOT TO EXPOSE THE THRUTH, THEIR CRIMES, AND THE MOB.I HEREBY REQUEST FOR YOUR HELP

INTERNATIONAL MOB OF ORGANISED CRIME.SAMANTHA LOWRY RECENTLY SAID SHE WILL SALE ALL THE PROPERTIES, INCLUDING THE ONES OF MY PARENTS OBTAINED BY MULTIPLE PERJURY, THEFT AND FRAUD. AND SIGNED

INDOMITABILITY SAMANTHA AND THE MOB

THE NAME LIST AND INVOLVEMENT : PLEASE DO KNOW, SAMANTHA LOWRY WAS ILLEGAL IN THE U.S WHEN I LEFT, AND MOVED TO AUSTIN ON SEPTEMBER OF 2006 , WE ARE NOT MARRIED, SHE HAD ONLY TWO FRIENDS, ANDREW WESTBROOK, AND THE GLOYD FAMILY, YET, APPARENTLY SHE HAS STOLEN ALL MY POSESSIONS, AND EVEN MY PARENTS POSESSIONS WITH FRAUD , MULTIPLE PERJURY AND THEFT AND IN ONLY 3 MONTHS.

BRIEF

NO CUSTODY ORDERS, NO SUITS, NO WARRANTS, NOT EVEN ATTORNEYS INVOLVED WHEN I LEFT WITH MY SON ON MAY 25 TO GIVE HIM MEDICAL ATTENTION.

ALL OF THIS BEFORE THE PARENTAL KIDNAPPING WARRANT WAS ISSUED: SAMANTHA WAS SUPPOSE TO ARRIVE TO MEXICO (AND EVEN GIVED HER 2000 FOR THIS PURPOSE) IN MAY 28 ,AGAIN ON OR AROUND JUNE 3 AND AGAIN JUNE 8,(SHE KEPT POSTPONING THE TRIP BY CLAIMING SHE WAS ILL) ,

AFTER MY SON RECEIVED MEDICAL ATTENTION, I EVEN WENT TO LAREDO WITH SEBASTIAN, FOR HER TO LET US INTO THE U.S, (SINCE SHE HAD STOLEN ALL OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS), BUT NOT ONLY SHE DID NOT SHOW UP, BUT WHEN SHE KNEW SHE WILL NOT SEND ANYONE AND NOT BE THERE, SHE DID NOT EVEN TELL ME. I HAD TO GO ALL THE WAY THERE AND BACK WITH SEBASTIAN, FOR NOTHING, UP TO DATE, I HAVE REQUESTED OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS TO BE ABLE TO RETURN, BUT SHE HAS REFUSE TO SEND THEM.

THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT, SINCE AFTER ALL, SHE MADE A SECOND WARRANT AGAINST ME (CHILD ENDANGEREMENT) CLAIMING HE WAS ALLERGIC TO ALL TYPES OF FORMULA AND COULD DIE IN 48 TO 72 HOURS, YET, SHE DID NOT SHOW UP AS SHE SAID SHE WOULD, SHE DID NOT SEND OUR DOCUMENTS AND SHE DID NOT EVEN LET US INTO THE U.S WHEN WE WENT TO LAREDO, AND BY DOING SO, SHE TOOK HIM OFF THE BREAST , IT ALSO SHOWS( AS PER HER LIES), SHE WANTED HIM DEAD, AND SHE DID NOT CARE AT ALL FOR HIM, AND DID NOT EVEN CARE TO SEE HIM OR BE IN HIS LIFE.

IT ALSO SHOWS, I NEVER RESTRICT HER TO BE IN SEB LIFE, THE OPPOSITE, I DID ALL TO RETURN.(UP TO DATE) MAKING THE PARENTAL KIDNAPPING WARRANT PART OF THE FRAUD

ALL OF THIS WAS HUGE MESS WAS CREATED BY THE LOWRY MOB , FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO STEAL EVERYTHING FROM US, HER GOAL: LEAVE ME IN JAIL, STEAL ABSOLUTLY EVERYTHING FROM ME , FROM MY PARENTS INCLUDING EVEN MY SON AND EVEN KILL MY PARENTS. AND BECOME MILLIONAIRES IN THREE MONTHS !

THEY CURRENTLY LIVE IN 7005 WHISPERING CREEK AUSTIN, TEXAS 78736 (MY HOMESTEAD AWARDED TO THEM)

VERY IMPORTANT TO KNOW, BECAUSE OUR RELATIONSHIP WAS SPENT MOST OF THE TIME IN MEXICO, AND SAMANTHA HAS NO TIES IN TEXAS, AND HAS NEVER WORKED OR STUDY IN TEXAS, SEBASTIAN IS JURISDICTION OF MEXICO

SAMANTHA LOWRY : MOTHER OF SEBASTIAN PAVON CUELLAR, WHO DID NOT WANT HER OWN SON, AND REASON HE CARRIES ONLY BOTH OF MY LAST NAMES. IMPORTANT TO SAY, SHE HAD AN ABORTION TO NOT LOSE HER FREEDOM, EVEN AGAINST KELL, THE EXBOYFRIEND.BY HER USE OF HER "CONTACTS AND INFLUENCE" THE LOWRY FAMILY HAVE COMMITTED ALL TYPES OF CRIMES, INCLUDING ATTEMPT FOR MURDER, THEFT, FRAUD IN THE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS,TRESSPASING, PERJURY, AND MANY MORE.(POLICE HAS REFUSE MY RIGHT TO PRESS CHARGES) UP TO DATE SHE HOLDS ALL OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS AND SAMANTHA LOWRY, HER FAMILY AND THE MILNER FIRM HAS DONE ALL TO BLOCK MY RETURN TO NOT MAKE IT TO COURT AND NOT BE HEARD.I SENT MANY LETTERS TO COURT, BUT APPARENTLY ALL BEEN IGNORED, EVEN BEFORE THE FINAL HEARING, THE JUDGE SIGNED THE MOST RIDICOULOUS ORDERS, AND WITHOUT MY RIGHT ON BEEN HEARD OR BEEN PRESENT. SHE SAID SHE WILL LIVE OUT OF MY FAMILIES MONEY, PAY HER DEBT AND SPEND THE REST....

SUSAN LOWRY : THE MOTHER, OWNER OF HILLSBOROUGH NURSERY AT BISHOPSTONE, WHO WILL FEED CRYING BABYS A LIQUID TO MAKE THEM SLEEP, SAMANTHA SAID SHE DID BLACK MAGIC AND COULD HIPNOTIZE PEOPLE, IS IT TRUE ? ALSO APPARENTLY IS INVOLVED WITH HILLSBOROUGH CENTER IN SHEFFIELD UK, AND PROBABLY HILLSBOROUGH PRIMARY IN SHEFFIELD AS WELL, AND IS THIS SUE LOWRY THE SAME ONE ? sue.lowry@sheffield.gov.uk, Sue Lowry, Hillsborough Town Centre Development Officer, SAME NAME, LAST NAME AND HILLSBOROUGH ?, BUT ALSO WHERE MP MEG MUNN WORKS (EXPLAINS HER INVOLVEMENT) AND SHE IS NOT AN MP FOR BISHOPSTONE , AND ALSO A HILLSBOROUGH PRIMARY ? CONCIDENCE ? I DO NOT THINK SO.....

A MOB...PROFITING FROM CHILDREN.....

JOE LOWRY : OR JOSEPH LOWRY : ACCUSED OF SEXUAL ABUSE TO A CHILD IN HILLSBOROUGH NURSERY AT BISHOPTONE. AND WHO LIVES IN A TREE AND DOES NOT WORK AT 27 YEARS OLD. HE WILL SPEND THE DAY CALLING EVERYONE HE COULD FROM THE PHONE BOOK TO HARRASS THEM AND RECORD THEM, EASY TO PROVE WITH THE PHONE RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH CHILD NURSERY AT BISHOPSTONE, A CHILD ABUSER LIVING IN A CHILD NURSERY ?

JOHN LOWRY : THE FATHER, WHO OPENED A BUSINESS CALLED ACENTI DESIGNS LTD, A BUILDING COMPANY , CLAIMED BANKRUPSY OWING A LOT OF PEOPLE MONEY. AND HIDING THE ASSETS BEFORE. ANOTHER HUGE FRAUD, BUT THE TREE HOUSE IN HILLSBOROUGH CHILD NURSERY AT BISHOPSTONE, AS WELL AS THE ROOF OR AWNING OF THE BACK DECK OF HILLSBOROUGH CHILD NURSERY, HAS NO PERMITS ! A BUILDING COMPANY THAT DOES NOT GET BUILDING PERMITS ? A DANGER TO CHILDREN IN HILLSBOROUGH CHILD NURSERY IF IT IS WRONGFULLY BUILT ?

ALSO THEY TRIED TO EXPAND THEIR BUSINESS, BUT SINCE IT WAS DENIED,THEY TRIED TO GET ANOTHER PERMIT FOR SOMETHING ELSE, AND USE IT FOR THEIR PURPOSE THAT WAS DENIED.YET, THEY LIVE A A TWO MILLION DOLLAR HOME ? (HOW COULD THEY AFFORD IT?) WHICH THEY WERE ABOUT TO LOSE FOR THEIR HEAVY DEBT, AS WELL AS THE HEAVY DEBT OF SAMANTHA FROM UNIVERSITY . BUT NOW CLAIMING THEY WILL LIVE OUT OF MY FAMILIES MONEY ! PAY THEIR DEBT , AND SPEND THE REST ! WHAT A MOB !ALL INVOLVED AND ACCUSED OF FRAUD FOR MONETARY GAIN , THEFT, TRESPASSING AND DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY AS WELL AS OTHER CRIMES, BUT THEY HAVE DONE ALL TO GET IN THEIR POSESSION MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN REAL ESTATE, AND MILLIONS IN ART, AND ENOUGH TO PAY OFF EVERYONE THEY WISH IN AUSTIN ,TEXAS AND ABROADTHEY WERE ALSO INVOLVED IN A SHOTGUN MESS IN TARAGONA SPAIN, AS WELL AS BUILDING WITHOUT PERMITS, THEY HAD TO RUN OUT OF TARRAGONA FOR THEIR CRIMES... BUT THEY HAD A HOUSE, RECENTLY SOLD, (WHO´S HOUSE WAS IT ? ) ALSO THEY HAD TO MOVE AWAY FROM SHRIVENHAM, OXFORDSHIRE, U.K. FROM OTHER CRIMES THEY COMMITTED,(NOT DISCLOSE, INVESTIGATION PENDING) AS WELL AS SAMANTHA HAD SAID TO ME SHE WAS RAPED BY MANY MAN IN NEW YORK, (MAYBE A LIE, BUT THAT IS THE WAY THEY COMMIT THEIR FRAUDS, FILE FALSE CHARGES, GET CONNECTIONS, AND STEAL ALL THE MONEY THEY CAN) MAYBE IS HOW THEY KNEW JEREMEY MORLEY, ATTORNEY IN NEW YORK.

JEREMY MORLEY : NEW YORK ATTORNEY, AND ATTORNEY OF SAMANTHA, ALTHOUGH IS HER ATTORNEY, HE DOES NOT APPEAR IN ANY DOCUMENTS, BUT HE APPEARS IN THE INTERNET ON HIS WEBSITE TO BE THE ATTORNEY OF SAMANTHA LOWRY, AND SHE STARTED SEEN HIM, BEFORE I LEFT , AND WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE

THE MILNER FIRM :Jevon Scott Milner, Jami R. Milner, JOE D MILNER AND PROBABLY RELATED TO MILNER AND FINN IN DALLAS,(WITH A FORMER ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY) MILNER LAW FIRM, THE FRAUDULENT ATTORNEYS, HAD COMMITTED EVEN PERJURY ON ALTERNATIVE SERVICE FOR ME NOT TO BE NOTIFIED OF THE SUITS, THEY STARTED ALL SUITS WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE AND AFTER I LEFT,ALL MISLEADING FOR THE PURPOSE TO BLOCK MY RETURN IN EVERYWAY POSSIBLE, EVEN REFUSING MY RIGHT TO GET A PASSPORT OR BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR MY SON, AND GIVING EXCLUSIVE USE OF MY HOMESTEAD TO SAMANTHA WHEN SHE NO LONGER LIVED THERE (TRESSPASING), A RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST ME AND ANYONE RELATED TO ME , TO MAKE SURE I COULD NOT ACCESS ANY DOCUMENTS TO GET TRAVEL DOCUMENTS HERE TO MAKE SURE I COULD NOT RETURN.

APPARENTLY THEY GOT AWARDED BY FRAUD ALL WHAT IS AT THE END , BUT ALSO, JOE D MILNER, JAMI MILNER, AND SCOTT MILNER APPARENTLY GOT AWARDED ATTORNEYS FEES OVER SIX FIGURES FOR 3 MONTHS (AND IN A CASE WITHOUT CONTEST), SINCE I COULD NO SHOW UP, BE HEARD, OR BE PRESENT. BUT THEY HAD CONNECTIONS AND INFLUENCE, AND EVERYTHING THEY WILL BRING TO THE JUDGES, THEY WILL SIGN, EVEN IF ABSURD, MISLEADING AND ILLEGAL AND BEEN ALL A HUGE FRAUD FOR MONETARY GAIN. JOE D MILNER ADDRESS 9906 RICHELIEU RD .AUSTIN, TX 78750-2834 AND 3401 GLENVIEW AVE 78703 SAMANTHA DID NOT SHOW UP IN MEXICO, BECAUSE SHE WAS PRESSING THE FALSE CHARGES TO PLACE WARRANTS AND STARTED COURT ON MAY 30 ALL WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE, DAY THEY AWARDED CUSTODY OF SEB, AND WITHOUT ME EVEN KNOWING, I WAS STILL WAITING FOR HER....I WAS SERVED BY EMAIL, JUNE 19 WITH THE FIRST SUIT (A DAY AFTER PARENTAL KIDNAPPING WAS ISSUED)

MEG MUNN: (MEMBER OF U.K PARLIAMENT)THIS IS A PERSON FROM THE U.K PARLIAMENT "LABOUR MP" , OF SHEFFIELD, ( NOTHING TO DO WITH SEBASTIAN RIGHT ? WRONG !, SHE HAS USE HER INFLUENCE FOR ME AND MY FAMILY TO ME HUNTED DOWN) YET, IS THE PERSON MOST INVOLVED IN GETTING CONNECTIONS FOR THE LOWRY FAMILY ABROAD, AND EVEN WENT TO MEXICO CITY ON SEPTEMBER 14, SHE CONNECTED ANNE SNELGROVE TO GET INFLUENCE AS HIGH AS TONY BLAIR, BY DOING SO, THE LOWRY MOB AQUIRE INFLUENCE IN MEXICO AND UNITED STATES TO EVEN DO ILLEGAL RAIDS, AND ALL TYPES OF UNPUNISHED CRIMES

ANNE SNELGROVE : (MEMBER OF UK PARLIAMENT), SHE WAS THE ONE WHO GOT TONY BLAIR TO SAY Mr Blair replied that "full consular support" was being provided to the family in both Houston and Mexico City. WITH THIS, THE LOWRY MOB COULD COMMIT THE FRAUD FREELY, BY CONNECTIONS AND INFLUENCE, AND SO FAR, ALL CRIMES COMMITETED BY THE LOWRY FAMILY HAVE BEEN UNPUNISHED, OR AS SAMANTHA LOWRY SAID, INDOMITABILITY FOR THE MOB !

ADELANTE SOLUTIONS/ PAUL SALDANA : THIS PERSON IN AUSTIN, TEXAS. OWNS A BUSINESS TO HELP SMALL BUSINESS AND MINOROTIES, SAME AS MEG MUNN, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS, YET, HE HOLDS THE SITE OF SAMANTHA LOWRY BABYSEBASTIAN.ORG, WHERE YOU WILL FIND THE FBI MEDIA CONTACTS, POLICE MEDIA CONTACTS AND AS HE CLAIMS IN HIS SITE, HE HAS MEDIA RELATIONS AND GOVERNMENT RELATIONS , SAME WHO PROBABLY HAVE BLOCKED AND MANIPULATED ALL NEWS, I TYPED IN GOOGLE "FBI MEDIA CONTACT", AND IN THE WHOLE WORLD, ONLY 8 PAGES.....I ASKED HIM FOR HIS HELP, YET, HE NEVER REPLIED. adelantesolutions.com

ANDREW WESTBROOK : POLICE DETECTIVE FOR THE AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FRIEND OF SAMANTHA, WHO SAMANTHA LOWRY MET HIM ON SIXTH STREET ON A NIGHT OUT AROUND OCTOBER 2006,( SHE ARRIVED THE NEXT MORNING), HE COMMITTED PERJURY TO TRY TO MAKE THE WARRANT FOR CHILD ENDANGERMENT, BUT ALSO REMOVE MY CHARGES OF TRESPASSING AGAINST SAMANTHA AND FAMILY FROM BRAKING INTO MY HOUSE VIOLENTLY THROUGH A WINDOW,(SHE NO LONGER LIVED THERE) AND MOVING THERE WITH 8 PEOPLE, INCLUDING UNKNOWN MAN. SHE LIVES THERE UP TO DATE, STEALING, AND USING DOCUMENTS FOR FRAUD, THIS IS MY HOMESTEAD, YET, THE COURT AWARDED HER APPARENTLY EVEN THE SALE OF MY HOMESTEAD (COMPLETELY ILLEGAL ), BUT ALSO FULL POSESSION, AND A RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST ME OR ANYONE RELATED TO ME, THE LOWRY FAMILY AND THE UNKNOWN MAN HAVE GONE ALL TROUGH MY DOCUMENTS (PERSONAL AND PRIVILEDGED), AND MANIPULATED THEM, HOWEVER THEY WISH, (WHILE BEEN TRESPASSING), THEY STOLEN DOCUMENTS OF MY PARENTS TO COMMIT FRAUD IN THE MILLIONS, (EVEN THEIR PO BOX KEY),AS WELL AS STOLEN ALL MY LIFES ART WORK, OVER 1732 ORIGINAL PAINTINGS INCLUDING ALL THE ONES IN DAPACU.COM.( HOMESTEAD IN THE U.S IS HIGHLY PROTECTED, IT WAS ILLEGAL TO PLACE THEM THERE AND TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO AWARD THEM THE SALE OF MY HOMESTEAD) BUT THE MOB CAN DO EVERYTHING ! ALL A FRAUD, ALL WITH THE HELP OF CORRUPT PEOPLE.

BOB GLOYD: WE MET THIS FAMILY TO SUPPOSELY HELP US WITH THINGS FOR THE BABY SINCE WE DID NOT HAVE MONEY, I STARTED TO BE SUSPICIOUS BY MEETING HIS FAMILY: A DAUGHTER WHO WAS RAPED AND HAD THE CHILD, AND THE OTHER DAUGHTER (BLACK DRESSING, BLACK MAKE UP,) THEIR BOYFRIENDS EVEN SPENDING THE NIGHTS IN THEIR HOUSE. HE IS THE DIRECTOR OF UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, FOR COMPUTER ENGINEERING, AND MAYBE THE PERSON WHO IS BLOCKING MY EMAILS, SINCE AFTER ALL, SAMANTHA HAS ALL MY EMAIL ADDRESSES, INFORMATION THE FBI, WOULD NOT GIVE TO HER. BUT ALSO, MAY BE THE PERSON WHO GIVED CONTACTS TO SAMANTHA IN AUSTIN, MAKING IT SCARY TO EVEN THINK, HE HELPS PREGNANT WOMAN IN NEED AND NO MONEY...

WHAT IF CRIMES ARE COMMITTED AGAINST THEM ? WHAT IF THEY TRY TO FILE CHARGES ? THEY COULD NOT , OR IF THEY WILL FILE A SUIT ? THEY COULD NOT.THEY WILL HAVE THE SAME PROBLEMS I HAVE, NO PROTECTION FROM POLICE OR COURTS, UNPUNISH CRIMES ! AND UNABLE TO BE HEARD

DAWN FARR: WHEN I ASK FOR THE HELP FROM THE BRITISH EMBASSY IN MEXICO AGAINST THIS MOB, SHE CONTACTED ME AS THE CONSUL OF THE BRITISH EMBASSY IN MEXICO (EMBASSYS HAVE AMBASSADORS NOT CONSUL). AFTER ALL THE EMBASSY HAD ALL THE EVIDENCE, THEIR RESPONSE WAS SIMPLY A RAID OF INTIMIDATION, BUT LATER, I FOUND SHE WORKED IN THE VISA SECTION OF THE BRITISH CONSULATE !

MANUEL CAMPOS : PGR (MEXICAN POLICE) HIS EMAIL ADDRESS WAS IN SAMANTHA LOWRY EMAIL ADDRESSES, SENT BY ACCIDENT IN A FORWARDING EMAIL, MOST LIKELY THE PERSON RESPONSABLE FOR THE ILLEGAL RAIDS INTO MY PARENTS HOUSE,(NO RECORD ANYWHERE) WHEN THEY KNEW I WAS IN VERACRUZ, SAMANTHA ADMITS SENDING THE RAID, BUT ALSO SHOWN IN NEWS PAPERS THE THEFT OF THE COMPUTERS AND WHO KNOWS WHAT ELSE. (THE MURDER ATTEMPT) SPECIALLY WHEN SAMANTHA LOWRY KNEW SHE HAD CAUSED A HEART ATTACK TO MY MOTHER FROM A FED EX SENT WITH HER WRITING FULL OF LIES.

WHEN SHE KNEW SHE DID NOT KILLED HER, BUT THE HOUSE WAS EMPTY, AND HER HOLDING THEIR PO BOX KEY, AND THEY COULD NOT BE NOTIFIED OR SERVED, SHE CLAIMED HER PROPERTIES AND BANK ACCOUNT WAS MYNE, WITH NOTHING MORE THEN WORDS, THE JUDGES HAVE GRANTED HER ALL THAT. CORRUPTION OF THE MOB !

SARAH HILLEY :THIS PERSON IS FROM THE SWINDON ADVERTISER, IN THE UK, CHANGING THE STORYS AND NOT DISCLOSING ANYTHING OF WHAT I HAD SENT, EXCEPT FOR A COUPLE OF LINES BUT ACTUALLY MANIPULATING AND CHANGING MY STATEMENTS.

JUDGE DIETZ : THIS IS THE MAIN JUDGE WHO SIGNED THE COURT ORDERS, MOST OF THE FRAUD WAS COMMITED IN HIS COURT, TOTALLY MISLEADING SUITS, AND ABSURD SUITS, EVEN SAMANTHA CLAIMING THE BANK ACCOUNT OF MY PARENTS AND THEIR PROPERTIES WERE MINE, WITH ONLY WORDS... NEVERTHELESS, APPARENTLY THEY WHERE GRANTED TO THEM.

AGENT SIMERLEY , FROM THE FBI , I HAVE MADE MANY ATTEMPTS FOR HIM TO CONTACT ME BY EMAIL, BUT HE HAS NOT, SAMANTHA CLAIMS IT WAS THE FBI WHO BLOCKED MY RETURN BEFORE THE WARRANT OF PARENTAL KIDNAPPING WAS ISSUED. AND SAMANTHA LOWRY ALSO CLAIMS IT WAS THEM WHO REFUSE MY RIGHT TO GET A PASSPORT OR BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR SEB AND BLOCK OUR RETURN, AND IT WAS THEM WHO SAID FOR HER NOT TO COME TO MEXICO OR SEND OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS..... WHO IS THE LIAR ? THE FBI SET ME UP FOR THEM TO COMMIT A HUGE FRAUD ? OR THEY PROTECT THEMSELVES WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE INMUNE TO CRIMES ?

THE GRANDFATHER OF SAMANTHA LOWRY WHO LIVES IN LONDON: ONCE SAMANTHA SAID HE WAS IN THE MOB, I THOUGHT IT WAS A JOKE, BUT NOW I SEE IS TRUE. SHE NEVER WANTED TO DISCLOSE HIS NAME, AND EXACT DEALINGS....

HER AUNT CAROLINA LIVES IN PUERTO VALLARTA, AND SAMANTHA LOWRY CLAIMS TO HAVE ALSO CONNECTIONS AND INFLUENCE, WITH ANOTHER HOUSE IN GUADALAJARA, YET, SHE IS A TEACHER FOR A PUBLIC SCHOOL (HARDLY NO INCOME)

HEIDI L HEINDRICH :IT WAS MY ATTORNEY, UNTIL I REALIZED SHE STARTED WORKING ON BEHALF OF THE MILNER FIRM , SHE MISREPREENTED ME, AND BY HER MAKING AN APPREARANCE, I HAVE LOST ALL I OWN. WHEN I ASK FOR DOCUMENTS FROM SAMANTHA LOWRY, SHE NOT ONLY DID NOT ASK FOR THEM, BUT SHE MADE A LONG LIST OF ITEMS ALLEDGELY WE WERE REQUESTING FROM THEM (SAME FORMAT AS MILNER) ASKING FOR THE DOCUMENTS THEY HAD STOLEN FROM MY HOUSE (WHILE TRESSPASING AND OBATAINED ILLEGALLY) BY DOING SO, WE WILL MAKE THE USE LEGAL , AT THAT TIME,I STOP HER AND I FIRED HER

ANTONIO WEHNES : MY FIRST ATTORNEY, HE SIMPLY STOLE THE MONEY, DID NOT EVEN REPRESENT ME, ( $ 5000USD), UPTO DATE, HE HAS NEVER SEND A BILL, OR STATEMENT.

VAZQUEZ ALVAREZ, MARIA DEL ROCIO : THIS PERSON WORKS FOR SECRETARIA DE RELACIONES EXTERIORES IN MEXICO CITY, A PERSON FROM THE MEXICAN CONSULATE SAID FOR ME TO SEND ALL EVIDENCE AND SUITS TO MEXICO. I SENT THEM TO HER, AND THEY WERE SUPPOSE TO REVIEW IT AND SEND IT TO AUSTIN, YET, UP TO DATE, SHE DID NOT EVEN READ IT, AND SHE HAS NOT SENT IT TO AUSTIN, I STARTED TALKING TO HER ON AUGUST 3, THE FINAL COURT WAS THE 13, AND SHE KNEW ABOUT IT, YET, SHE HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING MORE THEN NOTHING AT ALL.

AMY MERRITT : AND EXGIRLFRIEND I DATED 19 YEARS AGO FOR TWO MONTHS, SHE ALLEDGELY GOT PREGNANT, BUT SHE SAID SHE HAD AN ABORTION, BUT SHE LIED. 17 YEARS LATER I WAS ALOUD A DNA TEST (SHORTLY AFTER MY ALLEDGE SON GOT OUT OF JAIL WITH MY HELP), AND I WAS ABOUT TO SUE HER,( SHE COMMITTED MANY ATTEMPTS OF SUICIDE, HER FATHER CLAIMS SHE IS MENTALLY INSANE, AND SHE LOST THE CUSTODY OF ALL HER CHILDREN,) SAMANTHA KNEW ALL OF IT, YET, SHE CONTACTED HER TO SAY I WAS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS IN THE NEWS, RIGHT AFTER I HAD SAID TO SAMANTHA WARRANTS WERE ISSUED IN MEXICO, AND THE LIFE OF SEB AND MYNE WERE IN DANGER, BUT BY DOING SO, SHE WANTED US DEAD

NICOLA MOCKRIDGE : FROM THE BRITISH EMBASSY IN MEXICO, I WAS IN CONTACT FOR A WHILE TO TRY TO RESOLVE ALL OF THIS, IN ONE OCASSION I ASKED HER, WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO SEB IF I WILL TAKE HIM TO THE EMABSSY, WHO WILL CARE FOR HIM, AND HOW LONG FOR HIM TO GET TO ENGLAND, SHE REPLIED, ASK YOUR ATTORNEY (WHICH I HAD NONE) BUT BY HER ANSWER, IS OBVIOUS, THEY HAD NO CLUE WHAT TO DO WITH HIM, SIMPLY, THEY WERE NOT EVEN PREPARE TO TAKE HIM.

ALL OF THIS TO A 24 YEAR OLD GIRL ? WHO WAS ILLEGAL IN THE COUNTRY, WHO DID NOT ASK ABOUT SEBASTIAN IN 72 DAYS (EXCEPT FOR ONE TIME THAT I ASK HER, WHY YOU DONT EVEN ASK ABOUT HIM?) SAMANTHA LOWRY WHO DID NOT WANT SEB TO HAVE HER LAST NAME BECAUSE SHE DID NOT WANTED HIM, SAME THAT SAMANTHA NEGLECTED HIM AND PLACE HIS LIFE AT RISK, EVEN UP TO DATE, AND THAT SHE DID NOT GIVE HIM MEDICAL ATTENTION.SAMANTHA UP TO DATE HOLDS ALL OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS, BUT ALSO REFUSE TO COME AS SHE SAID SHE WOULD,MAY 28, AGAIN ON OR AROUND JUNE 3 AND AGAIN ON OR AROUND JUNE 8 AND EVEN FAILED TO MEET ME AND SEB IN LAREDO(AND NOT EVEN LET US KNOW) SHE COULD HAVE BEEN REUNITED WITH SEB SINCE THE BEGINNING AND AFTER I HAD GIVING HIM MEDICAL ATTENTION, BUT HER PLAN AND WITHOUT CARING FOR HIM,WITHOUT WANTING TO SEE HIM, AND TAKING HIM OFF THE BREAST, AND AS PER HER LIES, SHE WANTED HIM DEAD ! SHE HAS ONLY USING HIM TO GET ALL THE MONEY IN A HUGE FRAUD FOR MONETARY GAIN.WITH THE HELP OF AN INTERNATIONAL MOB WITH INFLUENCE AND CONNECTIONS.

WITH THE HELP OF ALL THE PEOPLE ABOVE, SHE WAS GRANTED APPARENTLY AND AS FAR AS I KNOW, 3700 CHILD SUPPORT A MONTH, ONE MILLION DOLLARS AGAINST MY PARENTS PROPERTIES (WORTH AT LEAST THREE MILLION) AND CLAIMING SHE WILL SALE THEM. SIX FIGURES OF HER ATTORNEYS FEES FOR 3 MONTHS, MY PARENTS BANK ACCOUNT, SOLE CUSTODY OF MY SON TO BE TAKEN TO IRELAND OR ENGLAND, SALE OF MY HOMESTEAD, AND ANOTHER PROPERTY, (BOTH I STILL OWE), AND ALL THE REMAINING ARTWORK AROUND 500 PIECES, AFTER THEY HAD ALREADY STOLEN 1200 , INCLUDING ALL THE ONES IN DAPACU.COM AND WORTH AT LEAST 4000USD EA FOR THE SMALL ONES ALL MADE WITH PERJURY AND FRAUD, BUT CONVINCED I COULD NOT BE HEARD IN COURT,OR BE ABLE TO RETURN AND THEREFORE DONE COMPLETLY RECKLESS. AND ALL OF THIS, WHEN SHE HOLDS OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS, PLACED MY SON IN DANGER, TOOK OVER MY HOME AND BLOCKED MY RETURN IN EVERYWAY POSSIBLE, WITH THE HELP OF THE POLICE, FBI AND COURTS.

THE ULTIMATE MOB OF ORGANISED CRIME, USING GOVERNMENT CONNECTIONS AND INFLUENCE TO COMMITT ALL TYPES OF CRIMES, INMUNE TO JUSTICE. ALL A FRAUD, SO MANY CRIMES, ALL BEEN UNPUNISHED, AND AS SAMANTHA SAID : INDOMITABILITY , SAMANTHA AND THE MOB ! MILLIONAIRES IN 3 MONTHS,

UNABLE TO RETURN, RUNNING TO SAVE OUR LIFES FROM MANY LIFE THREATS, ALL I SEE, IS WHAT A FRAUD IS THE LAW, THE ULTIMATE MOB, WORKING WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT ? FOR THE THEFT OF VERYTHING I EVER WORK FOR IN 40 YEARS !

SAMANTHA LOWRY WANTED SEBASTIAN DEAD, SHE CLAIMED HE WAS INTOLERANT TO FORMULA, AND THE DOCTORS SAID HE COULD DIE IN 48 TO 72 HOURS, YET, SAMANTHA LOWRY DID NOT SHOW UP IN MEXICO, OR IN LAREDO AND NEVER SEND THE TRAVEL DOCUMENTS AND BY DOING SO, TAKING HIM OFF THE BREAST. A TRULY PERVERSE MOTHER...

WHEN SHE KNEW SHE HAD PLACED OUR LIFE IN DANGER BY WARRANTS IN MEXICO, THAT SAME WEEK SHE GOT AN EXGIRLFRIEND FROM 19 YEARS AGO TO MAKE HER SAY I WAS EXTREMELY DANGEREOUS, PLACING OUR LIFES IN EXTREME DANGER

NOW, EVERYONE WANTS TO SHUT ME UP HOWEVER THEY CAN, EVEN MEG MUNN HAS COME TO MEXICO.....

UP TO DATE, I CANNOT RETURN, I HAVE NO DOCUMENTS, SHE TOOK OVER MY HOUSE, SHE HAS NOT SEND ANY TRAVEL DOCUMENTS, AND SHE NEVER SHOWED UP.BE THE FBI OR BOB GLOYD WHO IS BLOCKING ALL MY INCOMING EMAILS , AND AFTER THE LIFE THREATS , AND FALSE WARRANTS,I CANNOT USE CEL PHONES TO NOT BE TRACED, I CAN ONLY PROTECT MY SON. ALL I KNOW, IS, EVERYDAY I SAVE HIS LIFE, EVEN IF THE COST, WAS TO LOSE EVERYTHING I EVER OWNED.

UP TO DATE, I HAVE REPORTED THE FRAUD AND THEIR CRIMES TO SECRET SERVICE, POLICE, FBI, COURTS, BUSH, NEWS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY,SUPREME COURT, RICK PERRY, TV, EMBASSYS, S.R.E., ALL POLICE DEPARTMENTS IN TEXAS, MARSHALLS, HUMAN RIGHTS , ATTORNEYS AND THOUSANDS OF MORE PEOPLE, YET, NOTHING, MAYBE BECAUSE EITHER BOB GLOYD OR THE FBI HAS BLOCKED ALL MY INCOMING EMAILS, AND I CANNOT RECEIVE ANYTHING THEY DONT WANT ME TO RECEIVE. YET, NO NEWS, ALMOST NO REPLY, AND NO JUSTICE HAS BEEN MADE, EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE RECEIVED ALL EVIDENCE.

ALL MY RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED, ALL HAS BEEN A HUGE ILLEGAL FRAUD, A TRUE THEFT, WITH THE HELP OF AUTHOROTIES, ALL CRIMES UNPUNISHED, AND NOW, THE LAW, HELPS THE CRIMINALS, EVEN IF THEY ARE ILLEGAL IN THEIR COUNTRY. AND WITH DECICIONS OF CORRUPT JUDGES, ALL MY LIFES EFFORT, HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE MOB.

YET, I HAD EVEN FILED WITH THE POLICE ABOUT SAMANTHAS NEGLIGENCE TO SEBASTIAN,(RICK SHIRLEY) AND SO MUCH MORE EVIDENCE SHOWING HER LACK OF LOVE, HER LACK OF CARE, HER LACK OF MEDICAL ATTENTION, AND NOT EVEN SOCIAL SERVICES HAS CONTACTED ME.

AND HARRASMENT TO ALL MY FAMILY, ILLEGAL RAIDS, UNPUNISHED CRIMES...AN INTERNATIONAL HARRASMENT TO COMMIT A HUGE FRAUD FOR MONETARU GAIN IN THE MILLIONS BY A MOB WITH CONTACTS INSIDE THE GOVERNMENTS !

TERRENCE MICHAELS; FROM YOUR.HUMAN.RIGHTS.COM, HE CREATED A DAY BEFORE HE CONTACT ME THIS SITE, THE EMAILS COME FROM GERMANY, BUT HE IS FROM ENGLAND.HE SAID, THEY ARE FREEMASONS MOB, WHICH THIS COULD EXPLAIN THEIR CONTACTS, ALSO HE SAID OF MANY PREVIOUS CRIMES THE LOWRY FAMILY HAS COMMITED IN U.K AND SPAIN, EVEN IF THEIR BUSINESS IS PROFITING FROM CHILDREN IN MANY WAYS,ALL CRIMES HAVE GONE UNPUNISHED BY THE HELP OF THE GRANDFATHER OF SAMANTHA LOWRY

THERE ARE MANY OTHER PEOPLE INVOLVED, BUT NOT DISCLOSE SINCE THEIR INVOLVEMENT IS EITHER HELPFUL, OR IRRELEVANT.

THE LOWRY FAMILY LIVED IN SHRIVENHAM, UK THEY ALSO COMMITTED CRIMES THERE, THEY HAD TO MOVE, TARRAGONA SPAIN, SAME, COMMITTED CRIMES THEY HAD TO MOVE, NOW AUSTIN, TEXAS COMMITTED CRIMES HOPEFULLY, AWAITING JUSTICE, AND SAMANTHA LOWRY, WHAT CRIMES YOU COMMITTED IN NEW YORK ? OR ELSE WHERE...

THE LOWRY FAMILY IS A FAMILY OF CRIMINALS, ALREADY ADMITTED BY SAMANTHA IN WRITING TO BE A MOB, AN HAVING INDOMITABILITY AGAINST THEIR CRIMES, BY INFLUENCE AND CONTACTS, THEY CAN WORK WITH BRITISH EMBASSYS TO GAIN INFLUENCE WORLWIDE, MAKING THEM ABLE TO COMMIT ALL TYPES OF ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES AND CRIMES, WITH INFLUENCE AND BEEN UNPUNISHED.

EASY TACTICS, MAKE THE VICTIM A CRIMINAL , COMMIT ANY CRIMES, PERJURY, FORGERY, ATTEMPT FOR MURDER, ANYTHING TO STEAL EVERYTHING FROM THEM.A PREGNANCY FOR MONEY, WHERE SHE CLAIMED SHE DID NOT WANTED HIM, BUT NOW USING HIM TO GET THE MILLIONS, BUT SINCE THEY OWN A CHILD NURSERY, AND MY SON DOES NOT CARRY HER LAST NAME, WHOS CHILDREN ARE IN THAT CHILD NURSERY ? IN THAT PRIMARY ? AND WHAT DO THEY DO WITH THEM, IF THE BROTHER WAS ACCUSED OF SEXUAL ABUSE TO A CHILD ! IN HILLSBOROUGH NURSERY AT BISHOPSTONE, SWINDON ! WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF MY SON !

AND WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE PREGNANT WOMAN IN NEED WHO BOB GLOYD "HELPED", WHAT WOULD HAPPENED IF SOMETHING WAS DONE AGAINST THEM, NO MONEY, THE POLICE REFUSING TO PRESS CHARGES ? COURTS TOTALLY MANIPULATED ? SO MANY CONNECTIONS, SO MUCH INFLUENCE !HOW MANY VICTIMS ARE OUT THERE, FROM THIS INTERNATIONAL MOB ?WOULD JUSTICE EVER BE MADE ?HOW MANY CHILDREN OR BABYS ARE VICTIMS OF THIS MOB ? WHAT ARE THEY DOING TO THEM ? WHAT ARE THEY DOING WITH THEM ? WHOS CHILDREN ARE THERE ? IN THE HILLSBOROUGH CHILD NURSERY AT BISHOPSTONE.ARE THEY RECEIVING MONTHLY PAYMENTS FOR THEM ?

AND ALL OF THIS FROM SAMANTHA NOT COMING TO MEXICO AS SHE SAID SHE WOULD......

BY DOING ALL OF THIS, SAMANTHA LOWRY AND HER FAMILY HAS DESTROYED A BIG PART OF SEBASTIAN FUTURE, DESTROYED ANY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FAMILYS FOREVER, DESTROYED ALL WHAT I HAD WORK FOR, PLACED HER OWN SON IN EXTREME DANGER, AND DESTROYED HIS PRESENT LIFE AS WELL AS CHANGING AND HARMING HIS FUTURE FOREVER !. THAT IS NOT THE LOVE OF A MOTHER,IS A PERVERSE FAMILY WANTING TO BE MILLIONAIRES IN THREE MONTHS....

WHO AFTER ALL SHE DID NOT WANTED HIM.... REASON HE CARRIES ONLY BOTH OF MY LAST NAMES !

UP TO DATE AND SINCE APPARENTLY THEY HAVE REMOVED ONE OF THE FALSE WARRANTS, SAMANTHA IS STILL TRYING TO FILE MORE CHARGES, AS WELL AS STILL REFUSING TO SEND OUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS. TO MAKE SURE I CANNOT EVEN FILE AN APPEAL.

SAMANTHA LOWRY GETS PREGNANT AGAIN! SEE THE PHOTO, TAKEN MAY 26, 2008, SHE CLAIMS TO BE 6 WEEKS, YET, IT SEEMS MORE LIKE 4 TO 5 MONTHS. AND THE QUESTION IS: WHO IS THE FATHER OF SEBASTIAN? AND WHO IS THE FATHER OF THIS ONE? BUT ALSO, WHO IS NOW THE VICTIM? GO TO THIS LINK TO SEE SAMANTHA LOWRY PREGNANT AGAIN, TWO CHILDREN OUTSIDE OF MARRIAGE....http://www.pregnancy-calendars.net/PictureDetails.aspx?PicID=1641

See kidapped.tvsee Publicjustice.tvsee complaintsdirect.netsee injusticeofjustice.netsee thelawsuit.orgsee perversecrimes.orgsee pendingjustice.comsee judgewrong.netsee more when you google these criminals

Internet now is used to make justice, public justice.

We call it, alternative Justice, when Constitutional Due Process is denied, and human, civil, children rights violated.

Silly Bandz Direct is the official UK site for the #1 US craze Silly Bandz you can purchase the complete Silly Bandz Collection such as the Justin Bieber Silly Bandz, animal silly bandz and Princess silly bandz. animal rubber bands

Inside nfnorthface process of moment, the face area of the nation was clearedthroughout, and in addition for the tillers from the field wonderful variety of the people were used in rearing cows, and great flocks of sheep were given about your pasturage from the open as well as extensive glades,.

This specific North Face Sale pastoral personality from the people, just like those of their particular neighbours, the actual Tartars, would likely suggest an almost unbounded nation in part stuffed with.a new running around as well as unsettled population. Because men and women improved within amount, the particular peaceful, settled habits with the cultivators will be sorely discomposed through the encroaches from the shepherds, who, by the character "of their particular employment, would be associated with an complete opposite temperament. Accordingly, find which chaotic altercations came about bewteen barefoot and shoes, North Face Outlet usually ended in an empty break, as well as the whole wipe out from the herdsmen, who were henceforth obliged to be able to travel for security to be able to distant and also practically hard to get at mountains. There these people pursued his or her avocations together with small disruption, nevertheless ended up henceforth deemed little much better than The North Face outcasts via community.

Previously, the few grades associated with culture happened to run thus: the particular cultivators of brain, like the sages, literati, &c., graded 1st; then a cultivators with the territory; following these people used the particular shepherds, as well as dog breeders of cow; they used the fourth station; even though the retailers and also other exchangers associated with products were inserted towards the bottom of the list. The only adjust containing occurred of late many years within the design with this record is the fact that, considering that their particular beat, the particular shepherds have been addressed with distinct ignominy, and so North Face UK are right now regarded abdominal muscles least expensive caste of all.

There is little uncertainty yet that the cultivators had been have helped this kind of have difficulty from the leading guys through the day, along with the a sense of shame of (they pastorals had been certified with the expert of presidency. It is extremely noticeable in which as of this time period, and also ever since, agriculture! has become motivated by the best and greatest males which Cina offers made. It requires to have been found, how the reproduction associated with cows as well as the consequent level regarding North Face Jackets soil essential for pasturage has been quite inconsistent using the embracing gain every acre, to supply foodstuff for the calls for of your escalating and also clamorous populace. The particular smart males foresaw the particular scarcity which would end up being likely to prevail, and therefore utilized their utmost attempts to avert your disaster. Ponderous tomes are already coded in compliments of the cultivators of the soil, along with professional recommendation of the exertions, whilst the maximum list and also eminence have been directed at whoever has already been specially profitable..