The only way I could see huge donors being stopped from swaying elections is banning private funding through an amendment and then provide funding of elections through the public, but I don't know if people are going to want their taxes raised for that and I doubt there ever will be enough votes for it in congress.

It's one thing to not believe in climate change and therefore not pursuing policies that invest in green energy, but it's another thing to impose import tariffs on the industry in competition with coal. I get that he wants to keep the industry's manufacturing in America, but it's still going to hurt the industry.

When most people say that they are a libertarian leftist, they are referring to the political compass. If they took the political compass test, they would fall into the green.
I think that's where most American liberals would fall as well. Maybe the compass itself is flawed, but when someone talks about being on the libertarian side of the social spectrum, they aren't always talking about the Ayn Rand type of Libertarianism. They're just a leftist that believes that individual freedom is important.

This exactly what Michael Lombardi was talking about. I have got to say that horrible play where Sark had Sanu hitting one of the seams by himself so that Rodney McLoud could easily concuss him really pissed me off.