1. MajorityRights.com (main blog)We discuss issues related to the preservation of Western culture and the ethnic genetic interests of people of European ancestry.2015-03-02T00:58:54+00:00ExpressionEngineCopyright (c) 2015, GuessedworkerMR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielStag:majorityrights.com,2015:weblog/index/1.56972015-02-24T12:34:06+00:002015-02-25T08:23:07+00:00Tom returns to MR radio to discuss the state of political nationalism in Europe, the deep antagonisms that still exist among Europeans, the problem of negative identity arising from that, and the performance of intellectual nationalism at this point in our struggle.
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
_________________________________________________________________________
MYTHS AND MENDACITIES: THE ANCIENTS AND THE MODERNS - TOMISLAV SUNIC (The Occidental Quarterly, vol. 14, no. 4, Winter 2014–2015), run in addition to the podcast:
When discussing the myths of ancient Greece one must first define their meaning and locate their historical settings. The word “myth” has a specific meaning when one reads the ancient Greek tragedies or when one studies the theogony or cosmogony of the early Greeks. By contrast, fashionable expressions today such as “political mythology” is often laden with value judgments and derisory interpretations. Thus, a verbal construct such as “the myth of modernity” may be interpreted as an insult by proponents of modern liberalism. To a modern, self-proclaimed supporter of liberal democracy, enamored with his own system-supporting myths of permanent economic progress and the like, phrases like, “the myth of economic progress” or “the myth of democracy,” may appear as egregious political insults.
For many contemporaries, democracy is not just a doctrine that could be discussed; it is not a “fact” that experience could contradict; it is the truth of faith beyond dispute.(1)2015-02-24T12:34:06+00:00Guessedworkerwirebiz@btinternet.comhttp://www.majorityrights.comEuropean Nationalism, MR Radio, White Nationalism,Criticizing, therefore, the myth of modern democracy may be often interpreted as a sign of pathological behavior. Given this modern liberal dispensation, how does one dare use such locutions as “the myth of modern democracy,” or “the myth of contemporary historiography,” or “the myth of progress” without being punished?

Ancient European myths, legends and folk tales are viewed by some scholars, including some Christian theologians, as gross re-enactments of European barbarism, superstition, and sexual promiscuity. (2) However, if a reader or a researcher immerses himself in the symbolism of the European myths, let alone attempts to decipher the allegorical meaning of the diverse creatures in those myths, such as, for instance, the scenes from Orphic rituals, the hellhole of Tartarus, the carnage in the Iliad or in the Nibelungenlied, or the final divine battle in Ragnarök, then those mythical scenes take on a different, albeit often self-serving meaning. (3) After all, in our modern so-called enlightened and freedom-loving liberal societies, citizens are also entangled in a profusion of bizarre infra-political myths, in a myriad of hagiographic tales, especially those dealing with World War II victimhoods, as well as countless trans-political legends which are often enforced under penalty of law. Therefore, understanding ancient and modern European myths and myth-makers, means, first and foremost, reading between the lines and strengthening one’s sense of the metaphor.

In hindsight when one studies the ancient Greek myths with their surreal settings and hyperreal creatures, few will accord them historical veracity or any empirical or scientific value. However, few will reject them as outright fabrications. Why is that? In fact, citizens in Europe and America, both young and old, still enjoy reading the ancient Greek myths because most of them are aware not only of their strong symbolic nature, but also of their didactic message. This is the main reason why those ancient European myths and sagas are still popular. Ancient European myths and legends thrive in timelessness; they are meant to go beyond any historical time frame; they defy any historicity. They are open to anybody’s “historical revisionism” or interpretation. This is why ancient European myths or sagas can never be dogmatic; they never require the intervention of the thought police or a politically correct enforcer in order to make themselves readable or credible.

The prose of Homer or Hesiod is not just a part of the European cultural heritage, but could be interpreted also as a mirror of the pre-Christian European subconscious. In fact, one could describe ancient European myths as primal allegories where every stone, every creature, every god or demigod, let alone each monster, acts as a role model representing a symbol of good or evil. (4) Whether Hercules historically existed or not is beside the point. He still lives in our memory. When we were young and when we were reading Homer, who among us did not dream about making love to the goddess Aphrodite? Or at least make some furtive passes at Daphne? Apollo, a god with a sense of moderation and beauty was our hero, as was the pesky Titan Prometheus, always trying to surpass himself with his boundless intellectual curiosity. Prometheus unbound is the prime symbol of White man’s irresistible drive toward the unknown and toward the truth irrespective of the name he carries in ancient sagas, modern novels, or political treatises. The English and the German poets of the early nineteenth century, the so -called Romanticists, frequently invoked the Greek gods and especially the Titan Prometheus. The expression “Romanticism” is probably not adequate for that literary time period in Europe because there was nothing romantic about that epoch or for that matter about the prose of authors such as Coleridge, Byron, or Schiller, who often referred to the ancient Greek deities:

Whilst the smiling earth ye governed still,
And with rapture’s soft and guiding hand
Led the happy nations at your will,
Beauteous beings from the fable-land!
Whilst your blissful worship smiled around,
Ah! how different was it in that day!
When the people still thy temples crowned,
Venus Amathusia! (5)

Many English and German Romanticists were political realists and not daydreamers, as modern textbooks are trying to depict them. All of them had a fine foreboding of the coming dark ages. Most of them can be described as thinkers of the tragic, all the more as many of them end-ed their lives tragically. Many, who wanted to arrest the merciless flow of time, ended up using drugs. A poetic drug of choice among those “pagan” Romanticists in the early nineteenth-century Europe was opium and its derivative, the sleeping beauty laudanum. (6)

Myth and religion are not synonymous, although they are often used synonymously—depending again on the mood and political beliefs of the storyteller, the interpreter, or the word abuser. There is a difference between religion and myth—a difference, as stated above, depending more on the interpreter and less on the etymological differences between these two words. Some will persuasively argue that the miracles performed by Jesus Christ were a series of Levantine myths, a kind of Oriental hocus-pocus designed by an obscure Galilean drifter in order to fool the rootless, homeless, raceless, and multicultural masses in the dying days of Rome.(7)

Some of our Christian contemporaries will, of course, reject such statements. If such anti-Christian remarks were uttered loudly today in front of a large church congregation, or in front of devout Christians, it may lead to public rebuke.

In the modern liberal system, the expression “the religion of liberalism” can have a derisory effect, even if not intended. The word “religion” derives from the Latin word religare, which means to bind together or to tie together. In the same vein some modern writers and historians use the expression “the religion of the Holocaust” without necessarily assigning to the noun “religion” a pejorative or abusive meaning and without wishing to denigrate Jews. (8)

However, the expression “the religion of the Holocaust” definitely raises eyebrows among the scribes of the modern liberal system given that the memory of the Holocaust is not meant to enter the realm of religious or mythical transcendence, but instead remain in the realm of secular, rational belief. It must be viewed as an undisputed historical fact. The memory of the Holocaust, however, has ironically acquired quasi-transcendental features going well beyond a simple historical narrative. It has become a didactic message stretching well beyond a given historical time period or a given people or civilization, thus escaping any time frame and any scientific measurement. The notion of its “uniqueness” seems to be the trait of all monotheistic religions which are hardly in need of historical proof, let alone of forensic or material documentation in order to assert themselves as universally credible.

The ancestors of modern Europeans, the ancient polytheist Greeks, were never tempted to export their gods or myths to distant foreign peoples. By contrast, Judeo -Christianity and Islam have a universal message, just like their secular modalities, liberalism and communism. Failure to accept these Islamic or Christian beliefs or, for that matter, deriding the modern secular myths embedded today in the liberal system, may result in the persecution or banishment of modern heretics, often under the legal verbiage of protecting “human rights” or “protecting the memory of the dead,” or “fighting against intolerance.” (9).

There is, however, a difference between “myth” and “religion,” although these words are often used synonymously. Each religion is history-bound; it has a historical beginning and it contains the projection of its goals into a distant future. After all, we all measure the flow of time from the real or the alleged birth of Jesus Christ. We no longer measure the flow of time from the fall of Troy, ab urbem condita, as our Roman ancestors did. The same Christian frame of time measurement is true not just for the Catholic Vatican today, or the Christian-inspired, yet very secular European Union, but also for an overtly atheist state such as North Korea. So do Muslims count their time differently—since the Hegira (i.e., the flight of Muhammad from Mecca), and they still spiritually dwell in the fifth century, despite the fact that most states where Muslims form a majority use modern Western calendars. We can observe that all religions, including the secular ones, unlike myths, are located in a historical time frame, with well-marked beginnings and with clear projections of historical end-times.

On a secular level, for contemporary dedicated liberals, the true undisputed “religion” (which they, of course, never call “religion”) started in 1776, with the day of the American Declaration of Independence, whereas the Bolsheviks began enforcing their “religion” in 1917. For all of them, all historical events prior to those fateful years are considered symbols of “the dark ages.”

What myth and religion do have in common, however, is that they both rest on powerful symbolism, on allegories, on proverbs, on rituals, on initiating labors, such as the ones the mythical Hercules endured, or the riddles Jason had to solve with his Argonauts in his search for the Golden Fleece. (10) In a similar manner, the modern ideology of liberalism, having become a quasi-secular religion, consists also of a whole set and subsets of myths where modern heroes and anti-heroes appear to be quite active. Undoubtedly, modern liberals sternly reject expressions such as “the liberal religion,” “the liberal myth,” or “the liberal cult.” By contrast, they readily resort to the expressions such as “the fascist myth” or “the communist myth,” or “the Islamo-fascist myth” whenever they wish to denigrate or criminalize their political opponents. The modern liberal system possesses also its own canons and its own sets of rituals and incantations that need to be observed by contemporary believers— particularly when it comes to the removal of political heretics.

Myths are generally held to be able to thrive in primitive societies only. Yet based on the above descriptions, this is not always the case. Ancient Greece had a fully developed language of mythology, yet on the spiritual and scientific level it was a rather advanced society. Ancient Greek mythology had little in common with the mythology of today’s Polynesia whose inhabitants also cherish their own myths, but whose level of philosophical or scientific inquiry is not on a par with that of the ancient Greeks.

Did Socrates or Plato or Aristotle believe in the existence of harpies, Cyclops, Giants, or Titans? Did they believe in their gods or were their gods only the personified projects of their rituals? Very likely they did believe in their gods, but not in the way we think they did. Some modern scholars of the ancient Greek mythology support this thesis: “The dominant modern view is the exact opposite. For modern ritualists and indeed for most students of Greek religion in the late nineteenth and throughout the twentieth century, rituals are social agendas that are in conception and origin prior to the gods, who are regarded as mere human constructs that have no reality outside the religious belief system that created them.” (11).

One can argue that the symbolism in the myths of ancient Greece had an entirely different significance for the ancient Greeks than it does for our contemporaries. The main reason lies in the desperate effort of the moderns to rationally explain away the mythical world of their ancestors by using rationalist concepts and symbols. Such an ultrarational drive for the comprehension of the distant and the unknown is largely due to the unilinear, monotheist mindset inherited from Judaism and from its offshoot Christianity and later on from the Enlightenment. In the same vein, the widespread modern political belief in progress, as Georges Sorel wrote a century ago, can also be observed as a secularization of the biblical paradise myth. “The theory of progress was adopted as a dogma at the time when the bourgeoisie was the conquering class; thus one must see it as a bourgeois doctrine.” (12)

The Western liberal system sincerely believes in the myth of perpetual progress. Or to put it somewhat crudely, its disciples argue that the purchasing power of citizens must grow indefinitely. Such a linear and optimistic mindset, directly inherited from the Enlightenment, prevents modern citizens in the European Union and America from gaining a full insight into the mental world of their ancestors, thereby depriving them of the ability to conceive of other social and political realities. Undoubtedly, White Americans and Europeans have been considerably affected by the monotheistic mindset of Judaism and its less dogmatic offshoot, Christianity, to the extent that they have now considerable difficulties in conceptualizing other truths, other levels of knowledge.

It needs to be stressed, though, that ancient European myths have a strong component of the tragic bordering on outright nihilism. Due to the onslaught of the modern myth of progress, the quasi-inborn sense of the tragic, which was until recently a unique character trait of the White European heritage, has fallen into oblivion. In the modern liberal system the notion of the tragic is often viewed as a social aberration among individuals professing skepticism or voicing pessimism about the future of the modern liberal system. Nothing remains static in the notion of the tragic. The sheer exuberance of a hero can lead a moment later to his catastrophe. The tragic trait is most visible in the legendary Sophocles’ tragedy Oedipus at Colonus when Oedipus realizes that he is doomed forever for having unknowingly killed his father and for having unknowingly had an incestuous relationship with his mother. Yet he struggles in vain to the very end in order to escape his destiny. Here is the often quoted line Nr. 1225, i.e., the refrain of the Chorus:

Not to be born is past all prizing best; but when a man has seen the light this is next best by far, that with all speed he should go thither whence he has come. (13)

The tragic consists in the fact that insofar as one strives to avoid a catastrophe, one actually brings a catastrophe upon himself. Such a tragic state of mind is largely rejected by the proponents of the liberal myth of progress.

MYTHS AND THE TRAGIC: THE COMING OF THE TITANIC AGE

Without myths there is no tragic, just like without the Titans there can be no Gods. It was the twelve Titans who gave birth to the Gods and not the other way around. It was the titanesque Kronos who gave birth to Zeus, and then, after being dethroned by his son Zeus, forced to dwell with his fellow Titans in the underworld. But one cannot rule out that the resurrection of the head Titan Kronos, along with the other Titans, may reoccur again, perhaps tomorrow, or perhaps in an upcoming eon, thus enabling the recommencement of the new titanic age. After all Prometheus was himself a Titan, although, as a dissident Titan, he had decided to be on the side of the Gods and combat his own fellow Titans. Here is how Friedrich Georg Jünger, an avid student of the ancient Greek myths and the younger brother of the famous contemporary essayist Ernst Jünger, sees it:

Neither are the Titans unrestrained power-hungry beings, nor do they scorn the law; rather, they are the rulers over a legal system whose necessity must never be put into doubt. In an awe-inspiring fashion, it is the flux of primordial elements over which they rule, holding bridle and reins in their hands, as seen in Helios. They are the guardians, custodians, supervisors, and the guides of order. They are the founders unfolding beyond chaos, as pointed out by Homer in his remarks about Atlas who shoulders the long columns holding the heavens and the Earth. Their rule rules out any confusion, any disorderly power performance. They constitute a powerful deterrent against chaos. (14)

Nothing remains new for the locked-up Titans: they know everything. They are the central feature in the cosmic eternal return. The Titans are not the creators of chaos, although they reside closer to chaos and are, therefore, better than the Gods—more aware of possible chaotic times. They can be called telluric deities, and it remains to be seen whether in the near future they may side up with some chthonic monsters, such as those described by the novelist H. P. Lovecraft.

It seems that the Titans are the necessary element in the cosmic balance, although they have not received due acknowledgment by contemporary students of ancient and modern mythologies. The Titans are the central feature in the study of the will to power and each White man who demonstrates this will has a good ingredient of Titanic spirit:

What is Titanic about man? The Titanic trait occurs everywhere and it can be described in many ways. Titanic is a man who completely relies only upon himself and has boundless confidence in his own powers. This confidence absolves him, but at the same time it isolates him in a Promethean mode. It gives him a feeling of independence, albeit not devoid of arrogance, violence, and defiance. (15)

Today, in our disenchanted world, from which all gods have departed, the resurgence of the Titans may be an option for a dying Western civilization. The Titans and the titanic humans are known to be outspoken about their supreme independence, their aversion to cutting deals, and their uncompromising, impenitent attitude. What they need in addition is a good portion of luck, or fortuna.

]]>Wonderwalltag:majorityrights.com,2015:weblog/index/1.56952015-02-20T18:07:18+00:002015-03-01T14:00:19+00:00Adventures of a racialist following trance and fate - to Sicily and Poland.
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
Continuing to expound upon said adventures here and here.
It marked a difference of this group, an Amherst Alanon meeting of thirty or so, as I bluffed in the same way that I would, by standing up and pretending to shoot with my finger – Bang! Bang! Bang! But from this group ensconced at a church literally across the street from Emily Dickinson’s house – nothing. No reaction. They looked calmly upon me as only a harmless fool - A bullfrog on a lily pad. ....I’m nobody ...who are you?
I foretold them the Sicilians would act differently.
More than a year later, it was August of 1996, when at a similarly conciliatory meeting of similarly normal people seated in the same circular formation, I stood up, raised my finger like a gun barrel and shouted Bang! Bang! Bang! aiming at the Sicilians in rapid turn around the room in Aci Creale to their immediate fright and panic. To them, it was quite possible that this would be a real gun.
I woke up late on a morning as it turned September to see an unusual funeral procession moving through Piazza Duomo. Two coffins were being moved.
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
I saw the names of those who I would learn were Salvatore Botta 14 and Santa Puglisi 22, the nephew and niece of a rival mafioso. They were shot on August 27th while attending the funeral for Santa’s husband – who had also been shot..2015-02-20T18:07:18+00:00DanielSdaniel.sienkiewicz@reasonradionetwork.comhttp://www.majorityrights.comArcheology, Awakenings, Demographics, Ethnicity and Ethnic Genetic Interests, European culture, European Nationalism, History, White Nationalism,

Back to the conciliatory meeting of Sicilian friends for purposes of mutual healing, I castigated the beautiful and stylishly dressed woman who seemed to organize it:

“With your friends at Banacher, you pose as godfather but you are not the godfather!” I was walking on thin ice and knew it. I attempted to prove myself genuine as I knew without evidence that one of the girls had been incested. I charged the group to answer, “how did I know?” I was scared, emboldened by trance or not. I made it worse, blurting out that Maria was ugly (painful to talk that way about anybody, but especially Maria, a kindly lawyer who I met in a book store, who had brought me to the meeting) and that she didn’t care about her. Maria howled in pain. Seeing Maria’s (non-present) sister in my head, I imitated her voice and gestures, again, indicating my veracity. I ordered the “godmother” to hug and console Maria. She did and everybody clapped.

When I told the godmother that weeks before I had attempted to take a small, carved stone from the street ruins of Tiberius’ Villa on Capri, she reacted in horror, as if I was pulling a rib. Then I knew she was genuine enough for me. I told this group of Sicilians the truth, that I loved them, as tears poured down my face.Tiberius’ Villa Jovis as it was on Capri

Visiting The University of Palermo to look into matriculation a week before brought me into the Sicilian city at night – they can have a ghastly feel at night, like some Gothic Frankenstein movie, no people on the streets, no stores open, just dark and eerie silence among ancient buildings – a tinge of Egypt and mummification.

The next day I went into trance while talking to two lady psychology teachers, looking from side to side then spontaneously telling them, “this bitch thinks she is the godfather”... they laughed and I was on my way to that meeting in Aci Creale.

I stayed in a penzione off of Piazza Duomo in Catania. In evenings I would go to bars, eventually finding my way to one appropriately named Sonnambula. In these days and nights I tranced, remembering who a girl whom I’d met in Salerno weeks before was, Magda, as foretold and seen in my mind’s eye in Amherst, “not even the rain had hands so small.” I went back to Salerno where, on 9 6 9 6 I tranced the whole day. The Amherst trance came back to me, and fate gave me the excuse of spiritual mandate, even though in reality I could not afford to go and visit Magda in Poland.

On September 13th, to one of my biggest regrets, I forfeited an opportunity to connect with a half Italian half English girl at the hostel - she was bemoaning troubles, breaking up with her boyfriend in Australia and bought me a glass of wine to commiserate with me…but I had my ticket for Poland and appointment with destiny already. I told her I regretted not being able to stay. She was lovely. I kissed her on the hair and left. To make matters worse, that evening the hostel was having a hospitality night for African refugees. As I opened the door I saw a lovely Italian girl cheerfully coming to meet one of the Africans. I was disgusted. I couldn’t escape this even in Italy. I protested but knew that in the overall, for now, there was no fighting. I had to leave.

September 14, 1996, I arrived in Krakow for the first time, made my obligatory visit to Auschwitz from there and so on. As foretold, one of the tips of my new boots would be coiled as I turned a Krakow corner and my toe collided with the toe of a large Polish oaf turning the sidewalk corner from the other direction at precisely the same time. After a few days in Krakow, I went to Gdansk and met Magda. She lived in Gdansk, Zaspa, where the Nazis shot the postal workers/resisters, where Lech Wałęsa lived during his Solidarność days. As I explained “fate and god” had brought me to this rendezvous she naturally thought I was crazy. Even so, she went out with me a few times and I was able to treat her fairly extravagantly at the still humorously inexpensive Polish restaurants. After some days there, I went to Piła, because that was the only place in Poland where I knew that I had cousins. This was where my grandmother’s brother, Bronislaw, was moved as the Poles were moved westward - his hometown became a village in Belarus and Schneidemühl became Piła (again) - following the Nazi defeat in their territorial gambit for eastern nations and for which they received justifiable territorial penalty.

Balcony in Schneidemühl, where Hitler once gave a inspirational torchlight speech for the likes of Duke, Anglin, Hunt and other assholes.

My Grand Uncle was gone by then but his wife was still alive (still having letters from my grandmother). I met his three sons and their families. One of the sons, Ryzard, took me picking mushrooms in the woods. Spotting a good one he identified it and spoke, “Podgrzybek” - as I foretold in the Amherst meeting, my first Polish word spoken there, when I had never heard or spoken Polish in my life, but slowly did there, in the Amherst trance, saying, “Pod-grzy-bek ”...I could see my cousin Ryzard and explained to the group that I would meet him..that Poland would appeal to me among other reasons because the women were beautiful and there were no niggers there.

Upon return to America, I arrived in Boston and stayed at the Irish hostel near the Boston Garden. I saw what was (to me) a beautiful Italian woman with a black husband and mulatto child going to “Disney on Ice.”

In the last years prior to Internet taking hold, it was seemingly only me who’d notice that, care and want to fight or flee. In the bar below the hostel the barmaiden put a song on the jukebox, “Wonderwall”, which I “heard for the first time.” I say, “heard for the first time”, because it was not the first time – actually, I belatedly recalled why it was so familiar: I sang it repeatedly in the Amherst trance which happened in early ‘95, months before the song came out. It was apparently the summary song about me and that collective trance in which I was the unwitting master of trance ceremonies.

Money running out in Boston, and not seeing other options, I went to New Jersey but my father wouldn’t let me stay in his carriage house. So, I went to Fort Monmouth, New Jersey (where Italian WWII prisoner’s of war had been kept) and entered the homeless shelter (predicted too, to the accompanying tune of Phil Collins “Another Day in Paradise” sung badly by yours truly at the Amherst trance).

Black girl says, “dat White girl be fartin’ and gettin’ high on it.” They don’t like White girls. But the black women who ran the homeless shelter did like me, were delighted with me for antagonizing a young black who was messing with White women. I heard blacks talking about White women at the shelter. A White kid told stories about, and scoffed at, White women who went black, either making excuses for them or because “they were stupid and he hated stupid women.” He befriended the nig who I gave shit to. He figured Jews had their place on TV because they were talented. He supposedly had a 165 I.Q. Challenging me, I beat him 5 games to 3 in chess – one loss coming when I was drunk, another when upset, after returning from an argument with my father.

Another black at the shelter, characteristically pugnacious, claimed that Sicilians were not White, and that “they would kick the ass of anyone who’d say they were.” So insisted Henry Goldblum too, an acquaintance who I managed to see weeks before – insisting emphatically that Sicilians were “almost black”, though I had just been all around there and knew utterly different.

I had told the Sicilians that I would meet a guy of Sicilian extraction named Blaise at the shelter (I did, and he was not black, maybe a bit like Martin Scorsese). Another Italian guy wound up getting into a fist fight with the pugnacious black.

I flashed back to the moment that I first came into Catania (staying for four days in 1993) at night, driving through this, yet another ghastly Gothic nightmare of a city by night, and loving it..I was in Europe…a Europe that I could embrace, I did not have to hear the American bullocks about Sicilians being this or that…while I drove drunk out of my mind, a car marked “Vigilanti” drove up beside me and I shouted unafraid, big smile on my face, “Catania Bella!” …I was so happy that I was utterly unafraid despite driving drunk; still driving beside me, they caught my drift, shouted - asked me cheerfully where I was going and escorting me safe to Piazza Duomo where my penzione would be.

They noticed me in my custom made, three piece suit. I looked sharp. I was told that I could come in, “but no whiskey.” A kid actually followed me and told the bartender “no”, when I tried to order something irrespective.

Club Banacher

I began frequenting a bar on Piazza Duomo and I tranced at a dinner party in the side room. I told the people to show me the broken Sicilian goddess, whose sacrament of tens of thousands of years had been surrendered to a Mulatto. This disgusting beast was gaining the treasure of her energy. I could see it radiating from him, the stolen legacy of the aeons. There she was the next day – she was so subtle, so beautiful, and a travesty sitting there with the radiating mulatto who, in no way, shape or form, should have been able to even dream of her. Two girls from the dinner party sat pensively on either side, bookmarking the tragedy to point it out. I was unable to do anything but display my anger, and the slime even thanked me for some reason. It made me sick. As I would be sickened by the few occasions when I saw a Sicilian woman with a black. I had to tell the Sicilians that it was not we who should be fighting and killing each other.

In Catania, a city of 500,000, there were 86 murders the prior year, almost all mafia on mafia. Still, compare it to the black city of Baltimore, same size, 364 murders in a year.

I am not Sicilian but felt the profound relief of being in a place where I felt warranted to be because I really cared. As opposed to being a half Italian half Polish man in America – What’s that?

On a side street of Catania I sat with a Chimay Blue on the steps of an ancient columned building. The street was empty but the architecture, like Roman architecture, ennobled (unlike modern architecture - impersonal and dwarfing any significance as it might). But it was more.. I sort of had a feeling here amidst a building with columns, like…who can make me go? Who can make me not feel at home? Let them try.

]]>Philosophical universe - Part 2tag:majorityrights.com,2015:weblog/index/1.56942015-02-19T08:41:09+00:002015-02-19T08:56:10+00:00by Neil Vodavzny
Comparisons may be in order here. In one hugely significant way Japanese pop-culture is way ahead of ours, with much more organic interaction between anime, music, literature, folk-culture. In a word, the islands of the rising sun are full of Japanese natives. It’s a shocking state of affairs, and one the leaders of the free world are less than amused by. While their breeding rate is dismal and they’re getting older, culturally-speaking there is a continuity we can only gasp at.
While Japan may be superficially cutesy, its pop-culture is not. It’s full of tropes such as the teen misfit, the schoolgirl popette, the emotional cyborg, hangups galore. The tribal mentality imprints itself on these gaudy trinkets of cyber-culture. That’s the attraction of Planet Japan – it’s sexy, not surrendering. Anime is a completely fetishistic artform, sex and tech in perfect harmony, Evangelion being the perfect example (prev).
The closest Europe gets to a harmonious pop-culture is (or was) Eurovision, a naïve folk-culture which is identifiable in Swedish pop-icons Abba. Though they sometimes come across like a beer-cellar oompah piano collective unconscious, make no mistake, they are sentimental optimists. It’s pop-Euro-folk as opposed to strident national sentiment.
If Eurovision was the circus of Europe, politically-motivated cynicism of the eastern states sabotaged its musical authenticity. So I have to say the only way to identify Europe is through its emblematic cohesion. Abba make a big effort to be pan-European, picking up Spanish guitar for Chiquitita. What we’re searching for is a naïve and non-cynical truth, something like pure tribalism. Without those emblems of harmony we are merely technically European, cynically so, without our hearts and anthems. “It’s about the music”, trumpeted the guy at the Turkish takeaway; they left in protest at the vote-rigging and who can honestly blame them? They are as folkloric as we are; listen to outside voices.
That is the spirit-road, and one shouldn’t deny that song and dance, effortless and free as a bird, are part of that route. I was trying to figure the “formula” of Abba; there’s one uptempo number goes “to fill the hole in your soul”. It’s a type of mock-tragedy, light as a bird with a hint of mystery.2015-02-19T08:41:09+00:00Guest Bloggerdavid@polymesh.co.ukAspirational harmony you see and hear in Gothic cathedrals and the Mediterranean romance of Demis Rousos and Nana Miskouri, while their homeland is pillaged by the Fraulein. Maybe (you say) they should exit the Euro to restart the Drachma and clamber back onto the holiday idyll of yore? Maybe, but it doesn’t solve the problem of what is Europe save another facet of the money-go-round.

If we crave European harmony, we need a counter to the global nexus, and that counter is spirit. The spirit of place is something artists can conjure-up as convincingly as kleptocrats knock it down. Here’s a quote from a short story I read recently by Pierre Gascar

It was a black horse with a glossy coat, one of those half-breeds the peasants used to harness to their wagons. It had just been shod, and the blacksmith wsa taking his tools into the forge when the horse set off towards the middle of the square without the blacksmith’s son, who had untied it, making a move to catch it.

The baker’s wife was running across the square. She saw the horse coming towards her. It was moving slowly with the clatter of its new shoes which made its progress more nervous. The woman took shelter in the coach-house.
I understood that everything that lived in that animal, the burden of strength, the whinnies as yet unleashed, the dream of space freer than space, everything that was held in check was in this man and woman, who face to face stared at each other in silence.

It was market day, and carts blocked the square. The peasants left them there first thing in the morning, one against another, higgledy-piggledy, and led their horses away into the stables of a café.– La Petite Place

The square is evoked in painstaking detail with bright flourishes of grace and mood. The baker’s wife and the blacksmith’s son, joined by some invisible bond, the sombre horse reflecting their travails, the ateliers, the jumbled mass of peasant carts, the two eloping on the galloping mare. That type of story only exists outside the nexus of global finance-statehood. A spirit of self-government in all its contradictions. Hence, it’s a type of fable of humankind. One can imagine that living in such situations has a more fabulous Tati-esque sensibility. In that way, the life of La Petite Place borders on myth, it has not succumbed to the total rationalism of modernism.

That’s what I said: the totality of rationalism. That is to say, totalitarianism. And is not that a no-no? Greece may have invented democracy, but they were masters at disorganization, hence their sublime creativity. Modern analytics cannot countenance such independence of spirit. Greeks are the temperamental godfathers of Europe, and they are being leached in its name.

Let me put this in some artistic perspective. We may not accurately appreciate how thoroughly a Cartesian multiverse has efficiently managed to eliminate spirit. We live in a laboured, predictable reality. Literally everything comes under the same inane jurisdiction; Kim Sears, to pick a name at random, for expletives directed at a “flash Czech”. Meanwhile, ease of expression and grace go by the wayside. How has it happened to such devastating degree? Unless we can sort out what is amiss, how can we change in any significant manner the milieu, political or otherwise?

Everything is equivalent in some mysterious way; the Tati-esque choreography of an old French square; the baker’s wife running, the horse flexing its flanks, the psycho-sexual vibes. St Tropez, the 60s haunt of Bardot, had it; now it’s flattened by intercontinental brands and the buy-sell brigade. We are continually misinformed; management and global finance are the destructive forces.

The choreography of action cannot be pre-thought; you see it in 40s Marx Bros movies, creative outsiders. Guys like R Crumb, Ellison and the like are still there to stir the pot. We cannot close our minds to outsiders who’s voices strike with riveting clarity. My feeling or hunch is that a classical culture is a type of carefree theatricality, emotional extemporizing in the moment. Theatre and performance should strive to mirror that reality.

Here’s a thing. I was listening to The Early Music Show with Lucy Skeating, some medieval filigree, then got this stuff on YouTube – slightly corny, but corn is a good resource:

Now, this is not academic at all, it’s some self-taught musician, electro-pop, yet the medieval ambiance cannot be denied. He’s conjuring-up a mindscape, a landscape to great effect. Sense and sensibility; it doesn’t have to be accurate so long as the expression and feel are present, beloved of games-people and fantasy-merchants. Just add a travelling minstrel to La Petite Place to spin the yarn into a song.

There’s something dreamlike here, but something with a life-force, a life-force with a self-motivated direction. Predator and prey, craving sustenance, warmth, sex, habitat, gathering harvest. I mean, even an amoeba has that or it wouldn’t live! The BBC, however great an institution, doesn’t have it; it has research, think-tanks, academia.

CC Beck puts it like this

Citizen Kane was one of the first movies where the camera moved all over the place … In movies if nothing is happening on stage, move the camera..And nothing was happening in Citizen Kane..

If two people are fighting it’s best to show them facing each other, not the audience … but of course in the movies everything followed the Orson Wells approach.– The Comics Journal #95

I saw a fantastic Japanese action epic called 13 Assassins, set in the Shogunate era of the twilight of the samurai culture. They trek through a fabulous wilderness in their quest for the life of the Shogun’s renegade half-brother – shades of Rashomon. Reluctant Ronin grumbles “I gambled my life on this senseless war for power-politics”, and they are swept along by the just cause, for the renegade is a true villain, sadistic and sex-crazed, depicted as a sort of Japanese albino, his death-scene replete with rolling head.

In typical Japanese style, the blood is felt, not seen, a choreography of sound-effects and elegant sword-strokes. Contrast this true story with the unspeakable dullness of Wolf Hall; where is the carefree ambiance of the Tudor era? What I’m talking about essentially is temperament and type: those that seek justice, the scurvy knave. In Wolf Hall we only get weasel words and half-truths, not the naked savagery of a king’s yes-man.

3 versions of Nyoka TM & C 2015 AC Comics

What do they have in common? Simple; the ronin are ruthlessly effective mercenaries, the arabs are bloodthirsty worshippers, the English guy is a stiff-upper lip Jonny, the natives are superstitious skin-thumpers, the yanks are buddy-buddy toughies, Nyoka is even whiter by way of contrast in the jungle (etc.) Ethnic stereotypes abound, in other words; people without the prefigured, pre-thought reality of liberal determination. Sample dialogue: “seize the white infidel”, “at once, your illustriousness”. Also cliffhangers, woman in peril, being chased etc. Isn’t that what they’re for? As a footnote, the ethnic handiwork with thatched reed-roofs and the rough and ready village habitat could double for a luxury hideout for celebs.

This is where the school of pulp-fantasy that the comic books inhabit comes into its own. Temperament and type predominate. This is the test of true creativity. Everything can be pre-programmed in a pre-set reality, where knowledge is bandied round. Or everything can be a test of temperament; the tooth and claw of Harlan Ellison, the fanboy to fantasy innovator BWS. The latter, incidentally, landed in NYC on a wish and a prayer – the mark of an outsider.

Copyright 2003 Barry Windsor-Smith

All very classical, and there is a tradition of relating cherubs to the pagan in art. Christian or classical? How about both? The point is that there is a type of artless art that has a natural energy. It is not prefigured; it is a product of awareness – self-awareness as Bruce Lee would have it. Self-awareness is the bedrock of art, and it is a natural phenomenon.

You notice: rehearsed routines lack the flexibility to adaptBruce Lee’s languid appraisal of his 3rd tier opponent in Game Of Death (recovered footage)

Lee’s quote could be taken to imply that awareness is evolutionary, so you might relate it to the playful energy found in natural icons, or Tao (spirit). In any case, to be aware of natural spirit is to be moral, to have religion. All ancient civilizations pay obeisance to natural spirit. The Romans had water sprites and ritual baths – see Sulis-Minerva.

Our societies literally run counter to the flexible energy of selfhood that one might identify with Tao. Energy is deliberately utilized to provide smooth-running, hygienic, disinfected environments; if you take the energy equation from factory-farming to supermarkets, it’s entirely negative. Call it organized energy. The organized energy of prefabricated, preset routines has no use for natural energy.

So, what is natural energy? Here’s an interesting link; it takes the form of a tactile, small and energetic intelligence. If you take a look at this film of a microphage (white blood corpuscle) chasing a bacteria:

... you can see immediately that its actions are intelligent. That is, the energy is tactile, sensing its environment, directive.

Our organized energies destroy natural traditions which are small and tactile. This in turn destroys our natural defences against pathogens to which our bodies are designed to be exposed. I mean, in dirt, in less-than-hygienic environments – symbiotic microbes. That is the environment in which Man evolved and developed defences against (the sort of outdoorsy, horse and hunting world of some aristos, basically).

Not only the health-derived properties, but an awareness of symbolism, in water, earth. The last two paras from Animal Faith link reason to praxis, or the world of natural tradition (cosmic symbolism and associated ritual):

Ancient civilizations clearly did value the life-giving properties of springs, Roman baths, earth and mud. There is quite a lot going on here, and only some of it is symbolic. I’ve previously mentioned the fact that dirt strengthens the immune system because of the presence of micro-organisms. What you have is essentially earth-symbolism allied to fact (it may not have escaped your attention that the biggest threat to global health is an antibiotic pandemic?)
So, I think we underestimate the extent to which spirit affects us. An American pioneer settlement has an aesthetic appeal not by accident, but because it values the transcendence of craft, tradition, artisanwork over materialism. The presence of puritan chapels and unorthodox sects is a transcendent link to naturalism, animal and vegetative spirits.

All this is under present peril from prefigured, preset, predetermined liberal modernism, which has no concept of natural energy. Organization, the goal of all directed modernist groups, is the enemy of free expression. Therefore, we ought to divest ourselves of such modernist tendencies. Actually, this group seems wary of being de trop, so my words may not fall on deaf ears.

]]>Philosophical universe: Part 1tag:majorityrights.com,2015:weblog/index/1.56932015-02-16T16:34:49+00:002015-02-18T12:04:50+00:00by Neil Vodavzny
French “village cartoonist” Crumb was invited by Liberation and submitted this, which actually covers his ass as it isn’t a “representation of the Prophet”. That’s class.
If I may speak in religious terms for the nonce: he game of insulting the Prophet is old and in the way. Where in the Koran is there a para on the merits of totalitarian psychos? Both the Islamic and the Catholic worlds (restricting the argument to Rome for the present – maybe including American orthodox sects), have a vested interest in repelling the false prophets of militant unIslamic ideologies, who want a phony Crusader conflict. Actually, the best way to do this is to be pro-Islamic in the sense of recognizing the good prophets speaking through the words of Koran orthodoxy.
This in itself implies that we agree with orthodox Muslims on at least one thing, namely that there is a universe which can be recognized through religion, a philosophical universe. Any philosophical universe aims to explain the self, or at least has the self as its starting point. That is what a prophet is; self and universe correspond in terms of ethical principles.2015-02-16T16:34:49+00:00Guest Bloggerdavid@polymesh.co.ukMorgoth mentions the principle of “connecting the dots” and the most explosive way of doing that is to change the universe in which you live. In order to recognize Koran orthodoxy for what it is, the Right would also need to recognize Jerusalem as a historical landmark and Rome as a type of successor, albeit a fantastically ornate and hierarchical one!

In order, in other words, to repel false prophets, we have to belong to a true religion. A true religion is a hierarchy, because it is a form of natural energy in the same way the self is. Utterly spontaneous and the complete counter to the organized energy of modernism.

Hierarchy enables spontaneity in that each level has complete internal autonomy (as with the microphage example). That is the only way it works. If you were to somehow impose organization it would all fall apart, becoming cancerous and homogeneous.

A church follows the same principles as a family-tree; cardinals, archbishops or lay priests are completely self-sufficient entities. The fact they are caught-up in doctrine and ritual is a measure of the selfhood of the universe they exist in. Without the selfhood it would not be a universe. Being and harmony; the same in principle that Bruce Lee applies to kung fu. Without being we are but cogs in a multiverse of maze-like organization. This organization is not only of the state, obviously, but of the global monetary system.

The point I would make here is that insiders – of whatever creed – only belong to this system. Outsiders of whatever creed are outside the system. At this point in time, and for some time, the Right is railing against organized powers that comprise globalism. Some would say let’s organize – in this or that way, racially, nationally. Conversely, why be organized? Why not creativity?

Let me put it this way. Aristocracy is not organized in that sense at all; it’s simply a colony of family-lineages that values inheritance as a sort of God-given right. Barring revolution, that right is enshrined in law. So, it’s a natural system. Aristos are the landowning class, and are therefore physically and morally joined to the nation of which they form the erstwhile elite.

Natural systems physically exist, which is more than can be said of global finance and statehood. The physical self has a natural energy that is spontaneous.

Art is the expression of self. The techniques, though they play an important role in the early stage, should not be to complex or mechanical. Remember, you are expressing the technique and not “doing” the technique. When someone attacks you it is not technique number one (or is it technique number two, stance two, section four?) that you are doing, but the moment you are aware of his attack you simply move in like sound and echo without deliberation.Bruce Lee, My View on Gung Fu, 1967 (Art of Life)

Artists are spontaneous beings, and they express the self. That is, genuine artists or creative outsiders like French village cartonist R Crumb. I might just mention the “lineage” of French comic magazines which is second to none (Japan, US and France – manga, bandes dessinnees, classic newstrips). I was introd to Pilote in the late 70s by which time it headed a social-satire subculture riding high on the 68 uprising, having launched with miniature Gaul, Asterix as more of a kid’s thing. Prefiguring Pilote was Spirou featuring Belgian icon Tintin, while Metal Hurlant was established by Pilote regulars Moebius, Drulliet, Dionnet – a veritable maelstrom of sub-culture talent.

All the French magazines are no more; their streetwise energy eclipsed by your standard neighbourhood bookstore. I would say that cultural energy was of the outsider-type, the sense of fraternity one gets from editorial direction and sensibility. Much the same applied to 60s Marvel Comics. There is obviously something racial and national in that, as can be plainly seen from the cover to Pilote #1. Some people are written out of modern pop-culture. Where are the bookish college types and intellectual white women you see in this 60s X-Men?

copyright 1967 Marvel Comics

... Marine le Pen might qualify, and she was crudely insulted by “fellow” rightist Sarkozy. We get the likes of Paltrow, lighter than blancmange.

So, what I’m saying is natural systems are outsiders in the homogenised global culture. This point is fairly radical. It implies that the Right, in order to make headway against a global elite, should maintain outsider status. Actually, I’ve seen that point made in comments – the advantages of smallness and knowable status.

However, I’m now going to proceed to take it to unheard of levels! A natural system is what is meant by a universe. That is to say, a religion. Europe, viewed as a natural system, is Roman, with Jerusalem as a historical landmark. I don’t want to get too abstract here, so to be specific. The Kneset recently put forward a motion that Israel is a Jewish State, and that others are more or less freeloaders in their fiefdom (mainly Israeli-Arabs). Apart from the fact this is oppressive, historically Judea has been relatively heterogeneous – Aramaic, Assyrian, Greek. Herod was Aramaic and the language spoken was Aramaic.

Obviously, the principle reason is that Judea is a nexus for imperial leviathons, and sundry desert folk, a place of storytelling genius, not a state. The Biblical Ruth was Moabite, and hers also the Christian lineage. Hebes for much of their history were underdogs, hence Hebrew is the colloquial language of the NT, while Greek is the lingua franca and Aramaic the officialese.

I know that’s a godawful shock, that we might essentially establish a New Jerusalem. The reason is plain: it’s a physical place that existed as a spiritual nexus for imperial stormtroopers, whose stories therefore have a physical and moral force. The Torah is much more of a historical document than some would care to admit; the physical and the moral are what attract the pilgrim and the warrior.

One of Robert E Howard’s historical tales, The Road of Azrael, tells of the sack of Jerusalem when Crusaders and Saracens fought side by side against infidel invaders from the East. Christianity, Judaism and Islam – three faiths bound by one place. Let me take this a stage further.

Modern Greece is being slowly mangled by the European kleptocratic machine. There is nothing fraternal in that; it’s simply naked barbarism of Frau Merkel and acolytes (maybe by default). The modern world is designed to make us forget our fraternal allegiances in place of the organized power of global finance. While exuberant crowds greeting the victory of Syriza may be free expressions, you can bet it will make no difference to the immovable object of pre-programmed global finance. The Greek tragedy is they still pay obeisance to the ancient gods in their sublime extremities. The natural European to whom all should owe allegiance.

The crucial point is this: there are no external controls on a natural system. All ancient societies have a design which is visible from village to palace, from country house to bower. The design has a spontaneous order, which takes the form of a hierarchy. The same principle is seen in Haeckel; his depictions of what might be called natural traditions (icons).

The concept of pure spontaneity is anathema to our pre-programmed elites, but in fact that is what a natural order consists of. In order to become a European natural system, one should recognize the paradox that we cannot do so without the presence of Jerusalem as a historical landmark in our natural development. It’s essentially a similar argument to that of acknowledging orthodox Islam; to repel the false prophets. In this case, the prophets of global monetary homogeneity.

The three great faiths are rivals; what they have in common is their natural, spontaneous formation from more or less a single tree. This is something that cannot be denied, since to deny it is to be part of the insider-mentality of a global elite.

Know your enemy. Why is Islam so less modernist than the global elites? For the reason their societies are bound by religious tradition to a marked degree. They are not our enemy; on the contrary, a Christianised Europe would literally storm the temples of Mammon and the voice of Rome would once again sway the tides of Men. Francis, as it happens, is something of an outsider, being a Jesuit from the Americas. He is certainly one of the most unpretentious and independent-minded leaders of faith for a century.

Outsiders have to belong to a natural order, partly by virtue of our Crusader past, Jerusalem has a natural place in a European sensibility. If you care to indulge in unnatural organization that’s up to you, but you will be under the sway of a maze-like complexity that knows no bounds.

]]>A Request To Dr. Lindtner - To Build The Case Warranting Native European Defensetag:majorityrights.com,2015:weblog/index/1.56922015-02-15T05:38:06+00:002015-02-16T08:47:07+00:00Despite The Guilt Trips of World War II (discussed below on the anniversary of Dresden)
parts 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Here is an interview request that I sent to Dr. Christian Lindtner on February 12th
Dear Dr. Lindtner,
As producer for Majorityrights.com, I am writing you to inquire as to the possibility of arranging for an interview.
Majority Rights takes a position (secular) regarding Christianity which very much respects your scholarly critique.
Nevertheless, while I am writing you at this email address, my inquiry actually has more to do with a hope to discuss appropriate response to the fall-out of World War II, facts and mythos.
Your videos discussing holocaust revisionism are the most credible on the topic that I have seen. I do not see it as necessary to go-over that same ground in exhaustive detail. My position is that subsequent generations of Germans and others are innocent and ought not have to continue to pay, irrespective of the facts of Nazi Germany.
I am not anti-German and I am assuming that neither are you, anti-German.
My question is, how do we assert our innocence, along with that of present day Germans, to warrant implementing our defense of our nations as the preserves of our native nationals? - particularly in light of, and despite, the holocaust?
I believe that despite the holocaust that Germany and Europe does not owe the world, Jews, or anybody, its destruction through immigration and assimilation.
This is different from what holocaust deniers, even revisionists, are saying. Committed revisionists and deniers seem to believe everything, all of our defensive warrant, hinges upon debunking the holocaust. It is perhaps easier for me to see that as not necessarily the case as my ancestors even, had even less in the way of historical responsibility. Nevertheless, revisionists seem to have an overwhelming desire to unburden us of guilt trips* for these events, for which no guilt ought to be assigned them - and as a result, it seems to me that they are making the cause for European national sovereignty more resisted and less trustworthy when, in fact, it is a fully legitimate cause and ought to be seen that way irrespective of the holocaust.
What I seek from you in an interview is to help build this case to establish the warrant of European nations to preserve their nations for their native kinds despite The World Wars, whatever the facts.
Please say that you will grant us the interview Dr. Lindtner. It can be very important to inter-European peace and survival.
R.S.V.P.
Daniel Sienkiewicz, Majority Rights.
............................................................................
Dr. Lindtner accepts an interview which should materialize around March 1.
Dear Daniel,
Thanks for your interesting mail.
I shall be happy to grant an interview about the matters mentioned by you.
You can expect me to speak freely of these and related issues.
Looking forward to hear from you!
Best wishes
...............................................................................
For those of you who take exception to my deferential use of the word “holocaust”, understand that by it I mean a name given to mass deaths of Jews in the world war, however they came about, irrespective of any obnoxious elevation of importance of Jewish deaths over European deaths - which Dr. Lindtner recognizes in his characterizing it, holocaustianity, as a religion.
* I understand that holocaust isn’t only an issue of guilt, it is the basis for enormous financial payments as well, but that is among issues that I am hoping for Dr. Lindtner to address - his assistance in building the case to Warrant native European national defense, viz. that we have paid enough for any claimed grievances and are innocent to defend ourselves as sovereign native European nations.
.....................................................................................................................................................................
Continued - viz., “Despite The Guilt Trips of World War II (discussed here on the anniversary of Dresden)”
From Colin Liddell’s Saturday, 14 February 2015 article on the Dresden holocaust - “BOMBING GERMANY, RUSSIA, AND AMERICA IN ONE NIGHT”
At the Yalta conference, just days before the Dresden firebombing..Churchill was roughly shunted aside as the irrelevant leader of a morally and financially burnt-out husk by the two new superpowers. The clearest sign of this was the fate of Poland. This had been Britain’s declared reason for getting involved in the war, so the fate of Poland was a barometer of Britain’s position. At Yalta it was handed over to Stalin. Not only would the Soviet Union keep the territories seized from Poland in 1939, but the Lublin Government, set up and controlled by Stalin, would be placed in effective control of the country.
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
And this comment on the article..
com contrarian
“Let’s face it the period from about 1936-1945 was full of cock-ups on both sides, and only Franco came out of it with any credibility. Hitler shouldn’t have invaded the Soviet Union and shouldn’t have declared war on the US. Stalin shouldn’t have left his country so open to invasion. Mussolini should have stayed out altogether (Italy had half its merchant marine impounded before it even had the chance to fire a shot). Britain shouldn’t have tried to save Poland (when it had no power to do so) and shouldn’t have sent weapons to Greek communists.
From a particularist/nationalist perspective it’s best to write it off as a painful learning experience and get on with nationalism 2.0.”
Provoked this response from me:
I keep hearing these retarded arguments that the Nazis shouldn’t have invaded Russia and that Britain should’ve let Nazi Germany do as it liked with Poland. If 20/20 hindsight is to be exercised, then it should be said that Hitler shouldn’t have invaded Poland.
The next argument, also retardedly Buchananesue, is that Poland was betrayed to the umpteenth degree anyway and therefore Germany invading was of no matter.
But even under Soviet control, Poland retained a semblance of national boundaries, more importantly from its point of view, its language and more importantly still, its native genetic homogeneity. Horrible as Soviet control was, neither Poland’s boundaries, language nor genetics were in Hitler’s plans.
The holocaust of the peoples of Dresden is horrible. It is an unspeakable loss of European genetic treasure. As were all the European deaths of World War II - a war unnecessarily fought as a 1) conventional military war and unnecessarily 2) inter-European as it largely was, pitting R1b against R1a - both frames, conventional militarism and anti-Polinism/anti-Slav, were Hitler’s/Friedrich The Great’s.
If you want to use 20/20 hindsight to re-frame World War II and what should not have been done, take it to herr E1B1B1 Hitler.
Don’t kid yourself.
Look at how sick and enraged that Europeans were of ANOTHER World War, which Hitler and his worldview had some small part in initiating, a worldview that had the thin pretense of warrant to take lands and displace peoples up to the Urals on the basis of three and a half small cites being given to Poland by Versailles, a world view that had the design of removing your nation newly established after a bitter ordeal and fight of 123 years, and the realization of his plans of smashing it, taking it away again, killing your father, wife, your daughter, your brother, and you too, charged with the impersonal mission of bombing a precious German city, might just allow yourself to do that.
A habit, custom, and world view following the line of Friedrich the Great, based on inter-European militarism and a friend enemy distinction of Germanics/Savs is what should be rejected with 20/20 hindsight - not that Roosevelt and Churchill shouldn’t have gotten into the war, but that Hitler shouldn’t have ordered it in that way.
And don’t kid yourself either - if you know that a European nation like his has plans to take your nation and eliminate you (that was basically known) and some Jew points a gun at that European guy looking to kill you, what are you going to say? No, Mr. Jew, don’t shoot at this guy looking to kill me?
If you want to exercise 20/20 hindsight, for all the European deaths, where it should not have started, the epistemological blunder was with herr E1B1B1 Hitler’s world view and actions thereupon. And if you want to keep Europeans hating and fighting each other, just keep promoting the “innocence” of his worldview and the “supreme and singular guilt” of the Allied leaders.
...............................................................................................2015-02-15T05:38:06+00:00DanielSdaniel.sienkiewicz@reasonradionetwork.comhttp://www.majorityrights.comAnti-racism and white genocide, Far Right, History, Marxism &amp; Culture War, National Socialism, Revisionism, That Question Again, White Nationalism,

]]>MR Radio: Greg Johnson talks to GW and Danieltag:majorityrights.com,2015:weblog/index/1.56912015-02-09T15:59:12+00:002015-02-09T17:40:13+00:00On the radio page now, Greg Johnson, editor of Counter-Currents Publishing, talks to GW and Daniel about the crisis confronting our race, about liberalism and modernity, and about Martin Heidegger, his revolutionary 1927 opus Being and Time..
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
..and its meaning and utility for identitarians in the liberal age.2015-02-09T15:59:12+00:00Guessedworkerwirebiz@btinternet.comhttp://www.majorityrights.comMR Radio, Political Philosophy, The Ontology Project,“To ensure that Wikipedia is Zionist in nature”tag:majorityrights.com,2015:weblog/index/1.56892015-02-06T06:27:38+00:002015-02-09T05:34:39+00:00“To ensure that Wikipedia is Zionist in nature”
In response to Jewish troll JamesUK on February 05, 2015
DanielS
&nbsp; I was blocked from submitting an article on the obvious phenomenon of “mulatto supremacism”&nbsp; - which even has notable historical precedent in Haiti’s mulatto supremacist genocide of Whites on the island.
Wikipedia is censored to protect Jewish interests.
Proof of their influence on Wikipedia is to be found in videos which reveal Israeli boiler rooms - groups of people put up to spin wiki articles in a jewish way.
JamesUK
I don’t now what Wikipedia’s policy is on creating entries on its site so I can’t comment on that it.
I heard of Jewish commentators on YouTube like to Israel but not Wikipedia.
Where are the videos?
DanielS
It is so basically factual to anyone who has had dealings with Wikipedia and White activism that I don’t even feel obligated to make the case as a public service; I will leave you to further secretarial detail rather than getting caught up in your game of arguing over the obvious. Instead, I will provide just this one video example which you act as if difficult to find - a ready example of Jewish manipulation of Wikipedia:
Yesha Council in conjunction with “My Israel” has arranged instruction day for wiki editors. The goal is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As way of example, if someone searches “the Gaza Flotilla” we want to be there, we want to be the guys who influence what is written there, how its written and to ensure that its ‘balanced’ and Zionist in nature.
...................................................................................
In defense of Edgar Steele’s position in, “In defense of anti-Semitism” (excerpted at the bottom of the post), I said:
The i.q. factor has been adjusted for, to show that Jews are vastly overrepresented due to nepotism and other corrupt means.
JamesUK said in response:
I seriously doubt that seeing how the same pattern can be seen in other countries where they have less influence in state positions like in Russia.
DanielS
Your serious doubt is wrong.
JamesUK
I don’t think so.
DanielS
Well, you are wrong and not worth arguing with.
JamesUK
Seeing how it is an opinion either way there is not much to discuss.
DanielS
Well that’s it. You want to bring into question the obvious. That may show a dull chutzpah but it is only a tedious obstruction as it will not yield significantly new information - there is no scarcity of evidence to the contrary of your position.
But of necessity, I will offer this perfunctory summation:&nbsp; After factors of i.q. are taken into account, matters of Jewish nepotism, hyper-ethnocentrism, incommensurate ways of life and moral standards which do disservice to European interests and ways,&nbsp; Jewish coercion, bullying, bribery, brainwashing all have to be taken into account for what they should not be able to do at any rate - head European nations and peoples (which includes Russians), irrespective of the high i.q. of some Jews.
Regarding Duke and Black, we are not here to defend them, they can defend themselves. We are here to defend Whites and White patterns that need defending.
JamesUK
I don’t but they do run on an openly white political agenda and are members of openly pro-white organisations for decades.
They are the most high profile leaders of the WN movement in the US so they are the political representation of what WN believe in the US.
Other WN’s include Pierce and associates who are a mix of terrorists, mass shooters, a would be wife killer and a paedophile.
DanielS
You don’t get to say who is represented by Duke and Black. They represent themselves, or anybody who wants to be represented by them, which is not in all ways us.
They are not the only ones who care about European people and not comprehensively representative.
Steele was not a would-be wife killer. That was a set-up.
JamesUK
Facts say otherwise hence his conviction.
DanielS
On the contrary. These are the facts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1NG07kU8to Facts say that he was set up. A handyman (Larry Fairfax) that Steele hired to help around his property was a federal informant hired to set him up on the charge of murder for hire of his wife for her insurance. His wife, Cindy, didn’t have insurance. An audio- tape was fabricated to allege his having solicited the hit on Cindy for her insurance money. Audio experts were blocked by the (corrupt) judge from testifying as such.
What motive was there for Steele to kill his wife for non-existent insurance money? On the other hand, if you listen to, or read, Steele’s, “In defense of anti semitism” (an excerpt from the text is provided below, though the link to the site where the audio and text were is no longer available - I wonder why?), there was plenty of motive for Jewish interests to silence Steele.
What a jew you are
JamesUK
Not Jewish but it is like Blacks complaining about racism with problems in there own community.
DanielS
You are doing the bidding of Jews at any rate. You say WN are “complaining”, as if its trivial. But we are not “like blacks complaining about racism” around here. At MR we survey all concerns - centering on our own human ecological systems first and attending to problems and antagonists as they emerge relevant. Jews happen to be salient among antagonists in their genetic pattern and in 7 power points: finance, politics, law, religion, business, academia, media.
WN aren’t “complaining” ab. immigration and jews, we’re noting blockage to our sovereignty, destruction of our well being, deliberately imposed threat to our survival.
JamesUK
Apart from the US other western countries especially Eastern Europe do not have significant immigration to come anywhere near close to threatening the actual survival of the host countries that as I said before most are economic migrants from new EU countries.
DanielS
“Apart from the US and other western countries” .... a ‘little thing’ like The US and Western nations being destroyed. We’re supposed to shrug that off, right?
JamesUK
“especially Eastern Europe do not have significant immigration to come anywhere near close to threatening the actual survival”
DanielS
Even if we were so crass, indignant, egregious as to not care about western European nations, and if the western countries were to go under, then eventually the eastern countries would be submerged in spill-over tides of non-Whites as well. You know it.
JamesUK
most are economic migrants from new EU countries.
DanielS
You want Europeans to fight each other, like good right-wingers, don’t you?
Is that why you want to crash us together antagonistically with your EU? Perhaps you think Americans should vote for Republican neo cons and your Jewish war complex?
You think we should have gone to Hungary?
It must have been a good thing to Not do.
Go to hell.
JamesUK
Yes that did get media attention and the few media outlets that covered it admitted it looked favourable towards the organisers on the issue of free speech.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/07/american-racist-richard-spencer-gets-to-play-the-martyr-in-hungary.html
DanielS
That conference was too right-wing reactionary and probably played into the hands of how Jews would like us to be - the Gottfrieds, the Atzmons, the Dugins, the Jared Taylors, the scary scientistic factualizers to turn-off normal people.
........................................................................................................................................................................
Excerpt from Edgar Steele’s “In defense of anti-Semitism”
Note: JamesUK cited I.Q. statistics for Jewish success, which have been factored into equations of proportional representation in The Ivy league and professions, revealing that Jews are vastly overrepresented by dint of nepotism, political and religious propaganda, financial and legal manipulation.
Beneath Every Rock
Supposedly, Jews account for 2-1/2 per cent of the American population. Why, then, is half the student body at Harvard and most every Ivy League college Jewish?&nbsp; Statistics simply are not kept as to the percentage of Jews in this profession or that, but when was the last time you saw a doctor whose name did not end in “berg,” “man” or “stein?”&nbsp; I’m not sure I have ever met a psychiatrist who wasn’t Jewish.&nbsp; On the other hand, have you ever seen a Jewish farmer or mechanic?
Rarely do I appear in court, but the guy on the other side of the courtroom - and often as not, the judge, too - is Jewish.&nbsp; And, it is incredible the deference paid by the bench to the Jewish DA, or whoever, sitting at the other counsel table. There has been more than one trial where I could have merely phoned in my participation, for all the good it mattered that I was even there.
So many complain about what bankers, especially the international and central bankers, are doing to our country. Yet, hardly anybody seems to have noticed that those people are almost exclusively Jewish.
Behind Every Tree
They are everywhere in the media, particularly Hollywood. Talking heads, movie stars and the like. ...Pay attention and you will be amazed.&nbsp; The names won’t always be a good guideline, however, given how many changed their names at the turn of last century, so as to meld into the American population of that time.
Jews seem to comprise about 50% of America’s population, based upon those in visible positions. Looks can be deceiving, like Harvard, where they are drawn to those positions by their money, their intelligence and, most importantly, the indulgence of their kosher comrades.
People refuse to notice the Jewish hands on virtually ever power lever in the US federal government. Or at the helm of virtually every media organization that exists, and throughout the executive and editorial ranks. And, it’s not just Jews that control America - they are Zionists.&nbsp; Even Ariel Sharon, Israel’s current Prime Minister, has said openly, “Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it” - Oct.‘01. Problem is, most of us seem not to know it
The Power Behind the Throne
Books have been written on the subject, but, essentially, a group of late 19th-century elites, comprised of Rockefeller, Morgan and others, mostly Jewish, established an organization designed to consolidate their control of America and, eventually, the entire world. It was called the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Offshoots, such as the Bilderbergers, have formed since then, but the objective has never slipped from their sight.
One of the first acts of CFR’s members was to survey the newspaper field, the sole mass media of the time, and conclude that purchasing control of only 25 major newspapers would give them effective control of news dissemination. They bought those papers and, since then, many, many more. Today, members of these shadowy organizations literally run virtually all of the media, control the political structure in America, much of world business and are firmly in control of world banking.
That is why the two political parties in America have become identical, so as to provide us rubes with the illusion of throwing the rascals out come election time, yet with the same old agenda not missing a beat. Did you really see a difference from Bush to Clinton to Bush? They knew what NAFTA would do to America’s manufacturing base and job structure, yet both parties embraced it. We’re firmly on path to one-world government. America writ large, but the America now being molded without individual civil rights, not the America of the 20th Century. And it’s largely kosher.
Read about The “Israeli Spy Ring Scandal” for a particularly chilling look into the extent of the Israeli spy ring recently uncovered in America and Israel’s extensive US telephone network ownership.
It is not the purpose of this essay to prove Jewish control of America. There is ample material available on the internet for those who wish to prove it for themselves. Rather, it is my purpose to show that there are perfectly valid and understandable, even laudable, reasons for being anti-Semitic. Resenting those who manipulate us on a daily basis, against our own best interests, is primary among them.
&nbsp; ....
Hate laws are a singularly Jewish invention being foisted upon an unsuspecting public, so as to preemptively remove the possibility of criticism of themselves. Often written by the ADL, the organization that lobbies for their adoption, state by state, the laws are designed to stifle dissent and speaking out.2015-02-06T06:27:38+00:00DanielSdaniel.sienkiewicz@reasonradionetwork.comhttp://www.majorityrights.comActivism, Free Speech, Global Elitism, Media, That Question Again, Thread Wars, White Genocide Project,From small and neat to big and stupidtag:majorityrights.com,2015:weblog/index/1.56882015-02-03T23:41:00+00:002015-02-14T09:33:01+00:00by Neil Vodavzny
This is rather a hit and miss sampling of the good and bad of Eastern and Western pop-culture, apart from Bruce Lee, who I’ve recently discovered had a very neat philosophy of selfhood. I’m really sorry to have to say we should go to the East to get us out of this modernist mess we’re in, to get a sense of perspective if nothing else. Take the tripartite blandbusters of Nolan, Cameron and Ridley Scott (Interstellar, Inception, Invalid) is a blitz of prefabricated preposterousness. These sci-fi buffs always cite 2001 (hugely influencial on the East) whereas, in fact, the 1969 marathon has little dialogue and few ideas apart from primeval apes, a monolith and a star-child. Almost everything else is assumptions from our (collective) subconscious – therein lies its power. Lee’s statement “all knowledge is self-knowledge” never seemed more appropriate.
Staying with film, low-budget HK kung fu films have much more credibility than modern yawnathons, for the reason they’re much less thought-out – it’s fast and furious on-the-set. In Fist Of Fury, Lee plays a lone-wolf apprentice avenging his master’s murder by the Bushido school in Japanese-era Shanghai. There’s a startling clash between the cutesy-ornate period alleyways and Lee’s animal nature, gnawing at fresh dog-meat in a picturesque park to the tune of crickets (very 2001). Ornate patterns are pure atmosphere, rendering the Japanese habitats sparse and spacey, the geishas taking on an artificial aura. The climactic battle is fought to the tune of frogs croaking. That’s class.
Primitivism and rarefied artifice – eternal themes. Lee’s animal nature is also an artifice; he combines in one figure uncompromising absolutism with technical pragmatism. Absolutism is to be the centre of action, the still centre, calm and untroubled. One becomes in touch with one’s instinctive nature. Everything instinctive has an artificial quality because it makes us aware of the action taking place, the fight for existence, predator and prey. We become fully differentiated, man and woman, life and death. Fairy-tale fantasy-mode (I’m looking at you, Dawkins clones).2015-02-03T23:41:00+00:00Guest Bloggerdavid@polymesh.co.ukI randomly sampled YouTube and came to the conclusion we are fed a cut-price version of the “superman” who became a magnet for women. In truth, the way of a warrior is spiritual because he is the calm centre; his needs are justice, strength, discipline. The West is in this invidious position that equates physicality with sex; that’s only so when there is no spirit-road. The road of a warrior is an artificial one born of their instinctive nature; what we are sold is materialism without the source of strength. Small wonder the West is a slave to weakness. The Western mind is a product of objective conditioning, so that we have extreme trouble facing someone who practices an absolute reality. Lee’s writings spell it out, while what we are given is someone with clever acting skills. No, what you are seeing is what there is; an art born of Tao and Confucionism, being and harmony. When a teacher speaks it’s advisable to listen, even if you’re not a believer; I’m looking at you, European Right.

The West is almost deaf to such ancient practices, but it’s noticeable Ang Lee’s Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, which he calls Jane Austen with king fu, was box-office. Everything in Austen is consummate artifice; everyone is aware of the game being played-out, predator and prey, greed and lust, intermediary or trickster. The social milieu is an absolute to the extent it accords with the instinctive natures of a differentiated society, or castes.

Something about the man behind the legend that is Bruce Lee. He first came to Western attention as Kato, the Green Hornet’s sidekick, with an acting style that was already completely minimalist: expression as pure spontaneity. The Green Hornet may be less familiar than Batman, but its style is classical not camp. Vis, no preamble to plot, exotic locales with minimalist décor and noir lighting. Black Beauty as a song to retro-fetishism (that’s the big car).

Virtually everything you see is a type of useful stereotype, from Chinatown to the Black batman and the ever-primed Miss Case. The Mad Man-esque milieu makes you aware that the less you see the more is there. There are no distractions, no needless expositions. It’s action, suggestive sfx and taut, emblematic momentum.

By contrast, the mind of modernism is caught by analysis, everything is preamble, nothing is content – most apparent in blockbusters. I mean, except comics franchises where the content is already there, in the song the 60s sang. Content in a sense goes beyond style, expression as pure spontaneity, the goal to which classical art aspires. The dream-scape of the Pre-Raphaelites, for example, which overturned methods steeped in tradition-gone-stale to restore the youthful lustre of early Renaissance/late medieval.

Lee wrote various screeds on going “beyond system” in his personal approach to martial art (Jeet Kune Do).

There is no standard in total combat, and expression must be free. That liberating truth is a reality only insofar as it is experienced and lived in its suchness by the individual himself, and this truth is far beyond any styles or disciplines.Artist Of Life, Copyright 1999 Tuttle Publishing, HK (page 152)

This is life as a dream – or a legend. The West, being so beclouded by an objective multiverse, can regain a sense of perspective from the transcendental clarity of the East, beyond form, pure expression and awareness. We who have everything have nothing and must start with a dream, the dream of classicism. The taut string that sounds the right note; cadence and sense, taste and discipline, our European heritage.

It is always the goal of a classical artist. Copying any idiosyncratic style is almost impossible so, in that sense a master’s style is beyond style. Same for comics – plenty of Kirby imitators (Roy Lichtenstein I’ve never thought of as any sort of a stylist). Compare classic Disney to modern 3D animation – we’re in an age where perfect copies are replacing drawing, virtual acting replacing actors, etc.

CC Beck of Captain Marvel fame has, as I quoted before, this to say:

One of the early aviators took a plane over to China, and the Emperor saw the plane as it flew around and was not impressed at all. “Look, Emperor, it’s flying!” “Well, that’s what it’s supposed to do, isn’t it?” Now, a comic strip is supposed to illustrate.. what some writer has thought up. And I feel like the emperor of China saying “that’s what it’s supposed to do”. I’m not amazed how they can show people … being garrotted and getting their eyeballs shot out like they did in Godfather”The Comics Journal 95, 1985

The cadence of classical simplicity is something that is lost even in fable. Everything is preamble, nothing is amble (Into The Woods). We have to go to an East/West crossover art-form like anime to get a strong sense of tonal purity. French maestro Moebius is hugely influential in Japan, naming his daughter Nausicaa after the anime by Miyazaki, and here we get an idea of the stark, storytelling simplicity of a master:

So, why is it classical purity belongs to comic book and anime masters like CC Beck or Miyazaki, and not to fine arts? For the same reason there are exemplary interpreters of Beethoven concertos; the West can do subtlety till the cows come home, but not sublime simplicity. In the final analysis, black is black and white is white; the strength of the world is contained in its emblematic simplicity. Without that, we are caught in preamble.

Emblems can be seen as traditions within nature. Actually, this is one of the reasons fairy tales seem to exert a legendary force; their images are traditional to people and to the places they frequent. Woods, water and so forth. I might just invoke the name of Richard Dawkins here, since he has broadcast his disdain for such stories. Dawkins is the arch prophet of managerial efficiency; his faith in neo-Darwinism has no content that is traditional to nature – meaning spontaneous, with no pre-planning or fore-thought.

It’s the type of simplicity you get in folklore or even see in paintings. Since it’s spontaneous, it also has hidden subtleties, spirit. The actual content of nature is in its emblems – hawk, dove. Dawkins is so purblind to reality he literally cannot see that, so to him fairy stories have no content or moral worth. This point needs some elaboration, just to be as clear as concrete. On one side you have DNA, on the other side you have content (this is applied science, not theory). Content comes to a quite large degree from fractals; fractals have the property of continually branching, creating energy as they branch. Fractals form spontaneously; proteins fold repeatedly, DNA is wound into a tight bundle of fibres. Spontaneity is the actual cause of content. That’s quite an Eastern idea, you might agree.

Of course, there is a science for this, chaos theory, which describes certain forms, but doesn’t come even close to describing the emblematic or legendary. Another thing about spontaneity is it’s an actual process, there’s energy associated with it. The energy is just innate to the universe. Once you have that you have action, so implicit to emblems is the idea of action. The action of Tao or a type of playful energy; in Bruce Lee’s phraseology irregular, non-rhythmic. Lee explores the martial art aspect of this truth.

With action you have history, family-trees which contain ancestral DNA. History is all about action: clans, feuds, city-states, conquest and reconquest, alliances. History is a rich resource of emblems and pictographic representations, going right back to the origins of written language in Sumer. The fertile crescent was the seat of ancient civilization that was by all accounts polyglottish, the original settlers who domesticated animals, used the plough and trenched irrigation being a proto-Euphratic non-semitic people. This ancient terrain is a meeting place of civilizations, and was conquered and reconquered by Akkadians, Babylonians and their descendants. Aramaic, actually, was the non-Arabic, Syrian semitic language spoken in the New Testament.

This is totemic history bound up with ancestral lands. It has something of the living vitality of fairy tales as a response to the world in its pristine state. Yes, there is a technical advance, but there is an innate primitivism that exists as a genuine, sacramental response to nature, a tribal fetishism.

Those enduring the liberal age are fed the lie that tribalism is extinct and there is no alternative. But there is. Primitivism exists if we but see it, recognize it for what it represents. It is there in the blood and gore of the Brothers Grimm. It is also there in the heavens; a comet is an indicator of primal forces, and that is exactly what Rosetta found. The organic molecules in the cloud surrounding the comet. According to Dr Matt Taylor,“smells like a stag”: urine and alcohol and a sulphurous eggy smell. This is the stuff of life.

In order to be true to our heritage, we should also be aware of primitive roots which are ever-present. That is a Jungian view of things much more than one indebted to the obsessions of Freud.

Talking of primitive tribes, one of the creative minds behind 70s Red Sonja was Clair Noto, also known for “the best screenplay never filmed””. Her fantastically fertile imagination is close to fairy tale – flowers that bleed, scallops that feed, vats of blood, images of Red Venus from the collective unconscious.

One cannot have a decent fairy tale without gore, and pulps can just be fairy tales for adults. Something of the same argument applies to pulps; the characters are iconic, lofty, sturdily disdaining modern advances. One of the best comics series to explicitly tackle the ramifications of this is Warren Ellis’s Planetary (the summary in that link is well worth reading). Planetary is an “alternate reality” of the 20th century, a pulplike re-imagining of the causes of our so-called “advance” into the metropolitan cavern of modernity.

Ellis’s pulpish archetypes are spirits of the heroic age, stubbornly persisting in the age of the machine. They are not luddites, but they are solo adventurers, in the spirit of those magnificent men in their flying machines. Ellis is something of a post-Victorian fetishist, sort of re-imagining the glories of Britain’s 19th century techno-achievements in a futuristic setting.

The heroes he invokes have a tribal primitivism of macho, fetishistic techno-accomplishment and daring-do, with the odd female thrown in (see summary). Is, in fact, techno-accomplishment inherently fetishistic and tribal? One thinks of the glory days of WWII’s battle of Britain and Spitfires over southern England bashing the Huns. Deprive technology of its tribal heroics, and one is increasingly enslaved to the fetish worship. In other words, the romance these pulps evoke, is inherently tribal because technology is a type of fetish. Incidentally, Frank Zappa’s Joe’s Garage is a fantastically scurrilous rock-opera on a similar topic:

Freud, as we know, has a view of capital as an expression of (male) libido. Because he was a late Victorian, it could also be the case that industrial society functions as a primitive religion, one that worships new-fangled products. By that criterion, late Victorian society was male-oriented techno-fetishism. After all, capital is a word for goods, it’s really the techno-aspect that is tied to the male machismo, despite whatever.

Planetary, as a sort of Jungian view of that, takes due account of the tribal element in techno-advance; without that heroic ingredient, humanity is doomed to perpetual enslavement, now taking the form of new-media etc (“servers” and “followers”).

The heroes of Planetary exist to keep the weirdness and wildness of the world – its hidden reality. Weirdness and wonder are the watchwords of history. It is Man’s response to the world of action, what the East calls Tao. Robert E Howard’s heroic vistas and historical yarns of the crusader era have more vitality and truth than any number of BBC snoozeries.

Let no man read here who lives only in the world about him. To these leaves, let no man stoop to whom Yesterday is as a closed book with iron hasps, to whom Tomorrow is the unborn twin of Today. Here let no man seek the trend of reality, nor any plan or plot running like a silver cord through the fire-limned portraits here envisioned

Howard’s fantasy worlds are “free from the domination of observed fact”. Heroic tribal vistas of unbridled wholeness and primitivism. Man should pay obeisance to ancestral lands and totems because they are a sacrament of our relation to nature. Without the religious instinct, we are indeed tied to the dominion of observed fact.

The primitive power and potency of landscape is the stage on which history is written. What DNA-worshippers fail to see is that the power of primitivism, the fractal properties of matter, its essential tactility and spontaneity, are the content of nature. This is what we sacrament in ritual of water and wine; we are primitive and ancient beings.

This is slightly left-field, but I read that an order of German Templars established their sect in Bethlehem of the Galilee, a relatively unknown settlement in northern Israel. Archeologists have now uncovered evidence that this may be the Biblical one (not the other one in the West Bank). I have to admit to finding all that semi-historical, legendary myth-making fairly fascinating. Why be inhibited by objective preformulations of manifest stupidity when you can be liberated by dreams of dim provenance?

]]>End Game: The Destruction of European Peoplestag:majorityrights.com,2015:weblog/index/1.56872015-01-30T05:59:13+00:002015-02-25T10:18:14+00:00The Short and The Long of It.
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Marli
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Long version
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;2015-01-30T05:59:13+00:00DanielSdaniel.sienkiewicz@reasonradionetwork.comhttp://www.majorityrights.comActivism, Anti-racism and white genocide, Awakenings, British Politics, Crusade against Discrimination in Britain, Demographics, Ethnicity and Ethnic Genetic Interests, Immigration, Immigration and Politics, No particular place to go, Popular Culture, White Genocide Project, White Genocide: Africa, White Genocide: America, White Genocide: Europe, White Nationalism, World Affairs,Beauty, Pride and Happiness: An Inspiring Vision of Native Europe as nominated by Christag:majorityrights.com,2015:weblog/index/1.56862015-01-29T06:09:51+00:002015-01-30T03:36:52+00:00Beauty, Pride and Happiness
Being born and bred in London and knowing nothing else but ubiquitous multi- culturalism, it’s very difficult for people of my generation and younger to envisage an all English London, or Britain for that matter. Using myself as an example, I’ve never been in a public space which has been 100% English. Always does the spectre of multi- culturalism reveal itself, even in the most remote towns of England.
Most of you have had a palpable taste of what a homogeneous White country is like, but we haven’t! Therefore we desperately need to create this image of what a future, homogeneous White country would look like.
This has to be done, I think, through the culture. We need poetry, art, music and festivals (and fun) to hit those primal, emotive, tribal nerves.
On my streets I see minority White kids speaking like Jamaican gangsters. Why? Because they’ve had to adapt themselves culturally to the demographic reality in order to survive. Why isn’t there a cultural well from which they can gain strength and pride to overcome this imposition?
I’m not suggesting we become more liberally trendy, or neglect the hardcore topics, but we need to inject some life into this thing. To inject pride into our people, of the beauty of our people especially in homogeneity, and happiness (smiles and laughter) - because we’ve got enough tears and misery.
There is nothing particularly enlightening or original about my post, nevertheless as you know there is a complete absence of positivity in being English et al. I thought I could shed some light on why, perhaps, younger people aren’t being attracted to nationalism - or more importantly, being what they’re naturally supposed to be.
Although this is not an example from England, I think this is the kind of thing we should be doing and the kind of image we want to exhibit to all our people (especially the young) in our own unique authentic forms: Beauty, pride and happiness.
A vision nominated by Chris
Note: The last 30 seconds of the video are muted and nothing can be done about it. Sorry for that.2015-01-29T06:09:51+00:00Guest Bloggerdavid@polymesh.co.ukActivism, Anthropology, European culture, European Nationalism,...and a reminder from Bill of how England, the England he loved, used to be..