Your rules encourage building heretical space objects in order to hide from us. Maybe you consider it a good technique, but it only leads to the fault of not expecting the Physics Inquisition. In Newton's reality you defy yourself by telling us that you follow our lord, while you break his laws at every opportunity. This is worse than heresy. You will be reserved while a backup of your mind is being made to relive your upcoming execution in every two minutes. Forever.

Click to expand...

For the nth time, THE #1 RULE IS TO ONLY BUILD SHIPS/STATIONS THAT OBEY NEWTON'S LAWS!

You never wrote anywhere to don't follow these rules, your main description both here and at the Steam group is encouraging heresy instead of prohibiting it, but you say us in this little argument that you are the one who follow Newton, not we. This is not just heresy. You are trying to justify yourself no matter what, even by denying your own creed, just for one goal, to destroy the Inquisition, while it never stumbled in truly following and enforcing the truth you are only trying, or worse, pretending to accept. You are either just dumb or the pure evil, but one thing is certain: you are a faithful heretic. And heretics shall burn.

You never wrote anywhere to don't follow these rules, your main description both here and at the Steam group is encouraging heresy instead of prohibiting it, but you say us in this little argument that you are the one who follow Newton, not we. This is not just heresy. You are trying to justify yourself no matter what, even by denying your own creed, just for one goal, to destroy the Inquisition, while it never stumbled in truly following and enforcing the truth you are only trying, or worse, pretending to accept. You are either just dumb or the pure evil, but one thing is certain: you are a faithful heretic. And heretics shall burn.

By the way arguing with us is not heresy. Debating Newton's rules is.

Click to expand...

So now you somehow think you can define MY creed? Give me a second here,... I'm out of breath from laughing.
.
..
...
Kay, I'm good now.
And AGAIN, I'm saying to follow those guidelines by not doing what they say not to do.

You never wrote anywhere to don't follow these rules, your main description both here and at the Steam group is encouraging heresy instead of prohibiting it, but you say us in this little argument that you are the one who follow Newton, not we. This is not just heresy. You are trying to justify yourself no matter what, even by denying your own creed, just for one goal, to destroy the Inquisition, while it never stumbled in truly following and enforcing the truth you are only trying, or worse, pretending to accept. You are either just dumb or the pure evil, but one thing is certain: you are a faithful heretic. And heretics shall burn.

By the way arguing with us is not heresy. Debating Newton's rules is.

Click to expand...

funny thing. newton's rules are technically incorrect*

*technically, in 99% of the cases they are right.

on another note, Somedudewilson, would you please stop doubleposting and instead put both quotes in the same post?

1) Try to follow these guidelines for building ships, to hide from the Physics Inquisition by following Newton's Laws (Taken from their wiki page here):

Code:

Technique 1. Internally placed thrusters which have NO WAY of projecting directional thrust outside of the ship. Condition 1A. INCLUDING adjacent "lined up" thrusters pretending to exhaust all thrust through the rear most engine of the chain.
Technique 2. Externally or internally placed thrusters which when firing, project a visible jet of plasma/charged ionic particles through other ship components. Condition 2A. EXCLUDING thrusters which ONLY violate Technique 2 by hitting a sloped armor block at full thrust - which directs the exhaust safely away from/out of the ship. Condition 2B. EXCLUDING thrusters which ONLY violate Technique 2 by going through a single "Window Vent" block - which does not prevent visibility or provide any armor protection. It isn't even solid, it's just a set of open shutters.
Technique 3. Weapons lined up so that they fire through armor, weapon or subsystem components of the ship/station without doing damage.

Click to expand...

Please show me where it says: DO NOT FOLLOW THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES
Exactly, it doesn't.
Instead, it says: "Try to follow these guidelines for building ships, to hide from the Physics Inquisition."
Hiding=implicating that you do something that you shouldn't do
Following guidelines=doing exactly as they state, not the opposite

The following part is just plain strange: "by following Newton's Laws"
So doing the exact opposite as these laws dictate is "following"?
Riiiiiight...

Hypocrisy is the claim or pretense of holding beliefs, feelings, standards, qualities, opinions, behaviors, virtues, motivations, or other characteristics that one does not actually hold. It is the practice of engaging in the same behavior or activity for which one criticizes another.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-1" style="line-height: 1; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate; font-size: 11.1999998092651px;">[1]</sup><sup style="line-height: 1; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate; font-size: 11.1999998092651px;" id="cite_ref-2" class="reference">[2]</sup> In moral psychology, it is the failure to follow one’s own expressed moral rules and principles.<sup style="line-height: 1; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate; font-size: 11.1999998092651px;" class="reference" id="cite_ref-3">[3]</sup>Recent studies in psychology have identified the evolutionary bases and the mental mechanisms of hypocrisy, tracing its roots to adaptations that serve contradictory functions in the human brain, and to cognitive biases and distortions that predispose humans to readily perceive and condemn faults in others, while failing to perceive and condemn faults of their own.

1) Try to follow these guidelines for building ships, to hide from the Physics Inquisition by following Newton's Laws (Taken from their wiki page here):

Code:

Technique 1. Internally placed thrusters which have NO WAY of projecting directional thrust outside of the ship. Condition 1A. INCLUDING adjacent "lined up" thrusters pretending to exhaust all thrust through the rear most engine of the chain.
Technique 2. Externally or internally placed thrusters which when firing, project a visible jet of plasma/charged ionic particles through other ship components. Condition 2A. EXCLUDING thrusters which ONLY violate Technique 2 by hitting a sloped armor block at full thrust - which directs the exhaust safely away from/out of the ship. Condition 2B. EXCLUDING thrusters which ONLY violate Technique 2 by going through a single "Window Vent" block - which does not prevent visibility or provide any armor protection. It isn't even solid, it's just a set of open shutters.
Technique 3. Weapons lined up so that they fire through armor, weapon or subsystem components of the ship/station without doing damage.

Click to expand...

Please show me where it says: DO NOT FOLLOW THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES
Exactly, it doesn't.
Instead, it says: "Try to follow these guidelines for building ships, to hide from the Physics Inquisition."
Hiding=implicating that you do something that you shouldn't do
Following guidelines=doing exactly as they state, not the opposite

The following part is just plain strange: "by following Newton's Laws"
So doing the exact opposite as these laws dictate is "following"?
Riiiiiight...

Hypocrisy is the claim or pretense of holding beliefs, feelings, standards, qualities, opinions, behaviors, virtues, motivations, or other characteristics that one does not actually hold. It is the practice of engaging in the same behavior or activity for which one criticizes another.<sup id="cite_ref-1" style="line-height: 1; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate; font-size: 11.1999998092651px;" class="reference">[1]</sup><sup class="reference" style="line-height: 1; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate; font-size: 11.1999998092651px;" id="cite_ref-2">[2]</sup> In moral psychology, it is the failure to follow one’s own expressed moral rules and principles.<sup id="cite_ref-3" style="line-height: 1; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate; font-size: 11.1999998092651px;" class="reference">[3]</sup>Recent studies in psychology have identified the evolutionary bases and the mental mechanisms of hypocrisy, tracing its roots to adaptations that serve contradictory functions in the human brain, and to cognitive biases and distortions that predispose humans to readily perceive and condemn faults in others, while failing to perceive and condemn faults of their own.

Click to expand...

You've misinterpreted what I said. For what I meant, look at many of my other posts.
Also, on a side note, many constructions that you classify as "Non-Newtonian" actually follow Newton's laws from an in-game perspective.

Am I one of the few who sees that what is meant by this group is to build ships which abide by Newton's laws (Follow the same ship-building guidelines as that of the Physics Inquisition) but with the express purpose of hunting down members of the Physics Inquisition?

Am I one of the few who sees that what is meant by this group is to build ships which abide by Newton's laws (Follow the same ship-building guidelines as that of the Physics Inquisition) but with the express purpose of hunting down members of the Physics Inquisition?

Click to expand...

The guidelines they have aren't for building ships according to newton's laws, they are guiding you how to not build incorrectly, thus following newton's laws. But you can follow them, and then be hunted down by the inquisition just so you can be tortured until the end of days.

Am I one of the few who sees that what is meant by this group is to build ships which abide by Newton's laws (Follow the same ship-building guidelines as that of the Physics Inquisition) but with the express purpose of hunting down members of the Physics Inquisition?

Then I have to ask you why are you doing this. Our goals are matching expect we never did anything against Newton, and, for some reason, you hate us. It lacks all kind of logic. If you want to encourage following the way of lord Newton, why are you attacking the group who is actually doing this? If you don't want to defy the Three Laws, why are you writing in the first guide a newcomer will see to actually break those? Why are you constantly contradicting yourself? Hypocrisy? Envy of fame and power? Fear of being wrong? You would be a regular, strong heretic if you were consequent. Now you are like a peasant yelling at the king, wanting the throne, while being incapable of leading a kingdom. A selfish, envious, childish, aggressive nobody. This is not just heresy. This is childish envy spiced up with trolling. And there are a few things you don't realize. First of all, you are alone. Nobody wants to team up with you and join your anti-inquisition because you're repetitive, unnecessary, pointlessly aggressive, and clearly worse in quality. Second, you are only keeping the inquisition alive. We are judges and executives, without cases we are lost. You are our only case right now, a case where you cannot win but relive the story of Barbra Streisand. Third, we are the Inquisition. We don't need to prove our accusations, you need to establish your innocence. And, at last, heresy is a dangerous thing to play with. If you're not careful, you can easily find yourself in trouble by only talking about it.

Then I have to ask you why are you doing this. Our goals are matching expect we never did anything against Newton, and, for some reason, you hate us. It lacks all kind of logic. If you want to encourage following the way of lord Newton, why are you attacking the group who is actually doing this? If you don't want to defy the Three Laws, why are you writing in the first guide a newcomer will see to actually break those? Why are you constantly contradicting yourself? Hypocrisy? Envy of fame and power? Fear of being wrong? You would be a regular, strong heretic if you were consequent. Now you are like a peasant yelling at the king, wanting the throne, while being incapable of leading a kingdom. A selfish, envious, childish, aggressive nobody. This is not just heresy. This is childish envy spiced up with trolling. And there are a few things you don't realize. First of all, you are alone. Nobody wants to team up with you and join your anti-inquisition because you're repetitive, unnecessary, pointlessly aggressive, and clearly worse in quality. Second, you are only keeping the inquisition alive. We are judges and executives, without cases we are lost. You are our only case right now, a case where you cannot win but relive the story of Barbra Streisand. Third, we are the Inquisition. We don't need to prove our accusations, you need to establish your innocence. And, at last, heresy is a dangerous thing to play with. If you're not careful, you can easily find yourself in trouble by only talking about it.

Click to expand...

Firstly, there's no hypocrisy here. You guys just keep misinterpreting a certain phrase in the first post. Secondly, I don't hate you guys. I just dislike your style. Thirdly, this was a joke faction, started on a whim. Fourthly, you guys might need to prove said accusations when on a server not controlled by you.

Then I have to ask you why are you doing this. Our goals are matching expect we never did anything against Newton, and, for some reason, you hate us. It lacks all kind of logic. If you want to encourage following the way of lord Newton, why are you attacking the group who is actually doing this? If you don't want to defy the Three Laws, why are you writing in the first guide a newcomer will see to actually break those? Why are you constantly contradicting yourself? Hypocrisy? Envy of fame and power? Fear of being wrong? You would be a regular, strong heretic if you were consequent. Now you are like a peasant yelling at the king, wanting the throne, while being incapable of leading a kingdom. A selfish, envious, childish, aggressive nobody. This is not just heresy. This is childish envy spiced up with trolling. And there are a few things you don't realize. First of all, you are alone. Nobody wants to team up with you and join your anti-inquisition because you're repetitive, unnecessary, pointlessly aggressive, and clearly worse in quality. Second, you are only keeping the inquisition alive. We are judges and executives, without cases we are lost. You are our only case right now, a case where you cannot win but relive the story of Barbra Streisand. Third, we are the Inquisition. We don't need to prove our accusations, you need to establish your innocence. And, at last, heresy is a dangerous thing to play with. If you're not careful, you can easily find yourself in trouble by only talking about it.

Click to expand...

Hmmm, given that you claim to speak directly and infallibly for a man who has been dead for hundreds of years while providing no evidence of the legitimacy of your claim the charges of fraud and misrepresentation could be levied against you.

I'm not sure which side has more aggression, but I do know all of it is pointless.

Firstly, there's no hypocrisy here. You guys just keep misinterpreting a certain phrase in the first post. Secondly, I don't hate you guys. I just dislike your style. Thirdly, this was a joke faction, started on a whim. Fourthly, you guys might need to prove said accusations when on a server not controlled by you.

Click to expand...

Despite the numerous requests and misinterpretations you still refuse to correct the first post which was even quoted as the base of your heresy. You are only able to bash on us and say whatever you think will help you. Secondly, we also dislike your style, but that's not the point. The point is your objective to destroy us, that's something that nobody tolerates. Thirdly, a joke faction is supposed to be fun. Just compare this entire topic to the first post of the PIS'dOFF, in case you define us as an enemy you could use some advantages, because you currently don't have any. And fourthly, we only need to prove accusations if we ask for the help of external executives. The problem is: we don't. Usually. Maybe the server admins will come, and check the situations, but since heresy is equal to legal cheating which is made to destroy the gameplay, the whole point of their servers, they will tend to agree with us. Especially against you, against an anti-inquisition.
I don't know which side is more aggressive. I only see a new anti-inquisition appearing instantly with a goal to destroy us and take our place while being much worse in quality, and for a joke faction, not even nearly as funny as the Physics Inquisition. Sorry for not supporting this.

Firstly, there's no hypocrisy here. You guys just keep misinterpreting a certain phrase in the first post. Secondly, I don't hate you guys. I just dislike your style. Thirdly, this was a joke faction, started on a whim. Fourthly, you guys might need to prove said accusations when on a server not controlled by you.

Click to expand...

Despite the numerous requests and misinterpretations you still refuse to correct the first post which was even quoted as the base of your heresy. You are only able to bash on us and say whatever you think will help you. Secondly, we also dislike your style, but that's not the point. The point is your objective to destroy us, that's something that nobody tolerates. Thirdly, a joke faction is supposed to be fun. Just compare this entire topic to the first post of the PIS'dOFF, in case you define us as an enemy you could use some advantages, because you currently don't have any. And fourthly, we only need to prove accusations if we ask for the help of external executives. The problem is: we don't. Usually. Maybe the server admins will come, and check the situations, but since heresy is equal to legal cheating which is made to destroy the gameplay, the whole point of their servers, they will tend to agree with us. Especially against you, against an anti-inquisition.
I don't know which side is more aggressive. I only see a new anti-inquisition appearing instantly with a goal to destroy us and take our place while being much worse in quality, and for a joke faction, not even nearly as funny as the Physics Inquisition. Sorry for not supporting this.

Click to expand...

You'll note that anything I build WOULDN'T classify under that, and so then if I belong to some other faction on said server they may not take kindly to you attacking me. Also, I'm the only member of this faction, and I find these discussions hilarious.

Then I have to ask you why are you doing this. Our goals are matching expect we never did anything against Newton, and, for some reason, you hate us. It lacks all kind of logic. If you want to encourage following the way of lord Newton, why are you attacking the group who is actually doing this? If you don't want to defy the Three Laws, why are you writing in the first guide a newcomer will see to actually break those? Why are you constantly contradicting yourself? Hypocrisy? Envy of fame and power? Fear of being wrong? You would be a regular, strong heretic if you were consequent. Now you are like a peasant yelling at the king, wanting the throne, while being incapable of leading a kingdom. A selfish, envious, childish, aggressive nobody. This is not just heresy. This is childish envy spiced up with trolling. And there are a few things you don't realize. First of all, you are alone. Nobody wants to team up with you and join your anti-inquisition because you're repetitive, unnecessary, pointlessly aggressive, and clearly worse in quality. Second, you are only keeping the inquisition alive. We are judges and executives, without cases we are lost. You are our only case right now, a case where you cannot win but relive the story of Barbra Streisand. Third, we are the Inquisition. We don't need to prove our accusations, you need to establish your innocence. And, at last, heresy is a dangerous thing to play with. If you're not careful, you can easily find yourself in trouble by only talking about it.

Click to expand...

Hmmm, given that you claim to speak directly and infallibly for a man who has been dead for hundreds of years while providing no evidence of the legitimacy of your claim the charges of fraud and misrepresentation could be levied against you.

I'm not sure which side has more aggression, but I do know all of it is pointless.