A couple of things I'd like to raise:
1) XMPP Registrar
I'd like to discuss whether the registrar should consider including
"pending" registrations from experimental XEPs etc within the registry.
I think this would have two advantages:
a) It would reduce the likelyhood of a clash in registrations, which is the
basis for the registry.
b) It would act as a valuable documentation resource in its own right, if
uses linked to the Experimental XEPs, etc.
Desired Outcome: Decision on whether to raise this more widely.
2) Text used in ProtoXEP announcements.
I happened to notice the text ending announcements:
"The XMPP Council will decide in the next two weeks whether to accept this
proposal as an official XEP."
While this is entirely accurate, I think it might be nice to explicitly
state that the Council welcomes comments or some such.
Desired Outcome: Decision on whether to ask the Editor to change the text,
ideally with some suggested text.
Dave.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20150901/4a9efedb/attachment.html>