No, sorry. The I is a workaround, but people should be cautiioned not to
rely on it for the future.
-W
2011/1/10 Tihomir Surdilovic <tsurdilo at redhat.com>
> Hi Wolfgang, good points, thus I asked for a Jira so we can add proper
> support for it.
> If you know of a better workaround with whats currently available let us
> know.
>> Thanks.
>>> On 1/10/11 10:13 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>> I would not use I / DESCRIPTION for these reasons:
>> - it's not parameterized, and I think you don't want to repeat the
> @Meta(...) for every rule, you just want the argument
> - you can use only one I column, since the 2nd one silently overwrites
> the 1st one, so you'll have to squeeze multiple @s into one cell
> - it is an undocumented feature, and the name would suggest that it was
> intended for providing a comment
>> Adding a proper metadata column type is simple, given what is available
> from other column types.
>> -W
>> 2011/1/10 Tihomir Surdilovic <tsurdilo at redhat.com>
>>> Hi Jason,
>> for fact types and attributes you should be able to reuse the Functions
>> keyword in the RuleSet section of your sheet, for example:
>>>> -----------------------------------------------
>> | Functions | declare Person @author( Bob ) ......... end |
>> -----------------------------------------------
>>>> For rule attributes you can reuse the "I" keyword as the cell header and
>> add the attributes, for example:
>>>> -------------------------------------------------
>> |RuleTable Sample|
>> | |
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> | Condition | I |
>> Action |
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> | $p : Person | |
>> |
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> | name==$param| |
>> |
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> | SomeName | @author( Bob ) | System.out..... |
>> -------------------------------------------------
>>>> Neither are optimal, but just workarounds. If you raise a Jira, I can put
>> on todo list.
>> Hope this helps.
>>>> Thanks.
>> Tihomir
>>>> On 1/7/11 9:35 PM, Jason Mihalick wrote:
>>>> Tihomir, Do you know if decision tables support metadata<http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/5.1.1.34858.FINAL/drools-expert/html_single/index.html#d0e3368>?
>>>> ------------------------------
>> View this message in context: Re: Need help with Decision Table
>> Conditions<http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Need-help-with-Decision-Table-Conditions-tp2195003p2215160.html>
>> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive<http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-User-f47000.html>at Nabble.com.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing listrules-users at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>>rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing listrules-users at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
>rules-users at lists.jboss.org>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110110/04a17321/attachment.html