Filing
19

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
MARY JANE PICAZO,
5
6
7
Plaintiff,
v.
GRAND HYATT HOTEL,
Defendant.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
No. C 11-03321 CW
ORDER OF REFERENCE
TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE UPON CONSENT
AND SETTING
CERTAIN CASE
MANAGEMENT DATES
________________________________/
On October 4, 2011, a case management conference was held in
the above-captioned case. Richard Rogers appeared for Plaintiff.
12
Lisa McCabe Van Krieken and Genevieve Evarts appeared for
13
14
Defendant.
On October 10, 2011, both parties consented to proceed
15
before United States Magistrate Judge LaPorte by executing a
16
consent form.
17
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and
18
Rule 73, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned
19
case is referred for all further proceedings in the case,
20
including trial, and the entry of a final judgment to Magistrate
21
Judge LaPorte to be heard and considered at the convenience of her
22
23
calendar.
Counsel shall contact Kristen Seib, Magistrate Judge
24
LaPorte's Courtroom Deputy at (415) 522-3694 to set up a
25
telephonic status conference to confirm dates.
26
will set a trial date on or before November 5, 2012.
27
28
Magistrate Judge
1
The following case management dates have been set:
2
Completion of discovery other than from experts:
3
Disclosure of identities and reports of expert
witnesses: 8/7/2012
4
5
Completion of discovery from experts:
6
4/17/2012
9/6/2012
All motions directed to the merits of the case
noticed for hearing no later than: 6/21/2012
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Dated: 10/12/2011
cc:
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
MagRef; EDL
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.