I think it will be quite the opposite; when the present top 10 becomes irrelevant, it will be a bit like WTA now, where almost every slam has different winner.

__________________“There’s so many athletes, tennis players around the world,” he continued, trying to put his life into some kind of perspective, “they want to be the best in what they do. They want to succeed. Many of them, they don’t succeed in the end. I’m fortunate to have this opportunity and succeed.”

Who da fuck are those 2. One sided players - shemxy volleys, strong/ precise and placed serve in second case and medicore forehands and thats basically all! Not a match for an all around GOAT such is Dark Lord Djokauron

Who da fuck are those 2. One sided players - shemxy volleys, strong/ precise and placed serve in second case and medicore forehands and thats basically all! Not a match for an all around GOAT such is Dark Lord Djokauron

Why would you think that? Aside from the fact they have quite a few mental midgets, the 2 big reasons the WTA is so unpredictable are:

Because they are not good enough? There are more things to tennis than just surface. We've yet to see what generations younger than '92 are going to look like.

__________________“There’s so many athletes, tennis players around the world,” he continued, trying to put his life into some kind of perspective, “they want to be the best in what they do. They want to succeed. Many of them, they don’t succeed in the end. I’m fortunate to have this opportunity and succeed.”

Why?? I think he would have less Wimbledon (would split them with Sampras) and more Roland Garros probably (no Rafa to stop him). And the same at the HC slams.

Federer would have struggled in previous clay eras simply because the topspin clay court expert has always bothered him on the surface- Nadal causing him trouble wasn't the first time. Guga, Mantilla, even a past it Costa have ground him into the mud.