Author
Topic: Canon EOS 5DS R Mark II Talk [CR2] (Read 32686 times)

if canon is going for ultimate IQ. DPAF is the last thing they should be implementing. DPAF costs probably around 1/3 to 1/2EV performance off the base sensor going by the only few samples and comparisions we have of similar technology points. (70D to T6i sensor performance)

canon rumors FORUM

I can't believe that people are calling a 10 megapixel bump low/modest.

I would far prefer 60 superior megapixels to today's 50, than 75 megapixels that are the same quality as the current 5DSr. Also, I would prefer for onboard RAW preview processing to be as fast it is now for 30 megapixel files, rather than annoyingly slower.

Not that I'm really likely be in the market for either, but who knows, it's Q3/4... maybe Santa will be nice

Now it is all just a matter of balancing the megapixel count, image quality, shooting speed, features (dual pixel, ADC etc) into a final product.

- So not matter what sensor Canon releases, you can expect 5 FPS minimum unless it is some sort of super niche, no video, no dual pixel, all out stills IQ camera that many seem to want, but Canon refuses to release.

not true at all. because you ignored oversampling and the fact that if you re-sampled and NR'ed the 120MP data down to 60MP you'd have a cleaner image than the 60MP native.

Exactly...

People forget that the 5DsR had the BEST (low ISO) dynamic range of any Canon camera released at the time. But downsampling is needed in order to see this (if viewing on PC)... or just print at the same size as another Canon camera.

not true at all. because you ignored oversampling and the fact that if you re-sampled and NR'ed the 120MP data down to 60MP you'd have a cleaner image than the 60MP native.

Read my subsequent message - I already dealt with this.

I'd love a 120mpx camera, but I don't think there's enough demand for it, because it will be a pain to work with such huge files, it'll be slow and you'll have to downsample almost everything to make it worthwhile.