The email, as you can see does not specifically refer to the Benghazi attacks. It simply says to blame the protests on the internet video. However the attacks, which the administration said started as a spontaneous reaction to a protest, were clearly foremost on everyone one's mind and had just occurred 2 days prior to this email going out. Ben Rhodes knows that Susan Rice and any other white house official is going to be asked about Benghazi when they talk to the press. I don't think it can be disputed among the protests they were referring to in the email were the protests that they claimed(now we know falsely) initiated the attack on the Benghazi compound. It would be rediculous to think otherwise. Why would they leave out the mystical 'Benghazi protests'. Yet that is what Jay Carney does when asked in his press conference. He says the emails refer to any protest except the Benghazi protests. And now we know that Susan Rice ultimately when asked about the attacks, blamed them on the video. Also keep in mind that Ben Rhodes is a communications director with the white house. He is not a policy analyst or maker. When you read the email he is clearly concerned about appearances and is trying to shape opinion - not provide information.Lets also remember how much information the administration had from the CIA on the ground in Benghazi, and Libyan officials stating from the get go that there were no protests and this was a terrorist attack and that in spite of this President Obama blamed the attacks on the video for nearly two weeks after the attacks and deny it was a terrorist attack.All this can only lead any reasonable person to believe that this email is part of an orchestrated attempt to mislead the american people into believing the attacks on the Benghazi compound were initiated as a spontaneous reaction to an internet video protest as apposed to a pre-planned organized terrorist attack.http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2014/04/29/email-links-white-house-advisor-to-spin-blaming-benghazi-on-film/