Should doing something that some people find inconvenient be a crime in New Jersey?

State Senate President Steve Sweeney just quashed a bill that would have decriminalized the act of people pumping their own gas in our state. Sweeney said "there is nothing wrong with the current system" and "it's a matter of convenience, not safety."

For years we have been told that pumping our own gas is too hazardous to be legal. Now, like magic, it's really about "convenience." I'd laugh if this wasn't so pathetic.

If the standard by which we criminalize acts is "convenience," why stop with gasoline? There are limitless theoretical "inconveniences" out there. Why not outlaw self-serve coffee at Wawa? How about laundromats or cafeteria-style dining? Should you be allowed to cut your own grass, shovel your own snow or cook your own meals?

In reality, one person's "inconvenience" is the manifestation of another person's liberty. If nobody is harmed by an act, then with what moral authority can our elected representatives stop us from enjoying our personal and economic freedoms?

This bill would merely legalize self-service and give the consumer a choice. Many gas stations would likely continue full-service in response to customer demand. Competitive forces would ultimately ensure the best outcome. That's how the free market works.

Unfortunately, Sweeney has proclaimed that this matter is "going nowhere" so long as he's in charge. One wonders: Who benefits?

Don't kill the bill. The people of New Jersey should be empowered to choose how they want to receive their gasoline. They can "handle" it!