It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not ~ they will be killed." ~ Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg

Wednesday, 14 December 2011

JACK HERER: THE EMPEROR WEARS NO CLOTHES: CHAPTERS 4 ~ 6

Please enlarge this excellent and educational image.

CHAPTER
4 ~ THE LAST DAYS OF LEGAL CANNABIS

As you now know, the industrial revolution of the 19th century
was a setback for hemp in World commerce, due to the lack of mechanized
harvesting and breaking technology needed for mass production. But this natural
resource was far too valuable to be relegated to the back burner of history for
very long.

By 1916, USDA Bulletin 404 predicted that a decorticating and
harvesting machine would be developed, and hemp would again be America’s
largest agricultural industry. In 1938, magazines such as Popular Mechanics and
Mechanical Engineering introduced a new generation of investors to fully
operational hemp decorticating devices; bringing us to this next bit of
history. Because of this machine, both indicated that hemp would soon be
America’s number-one crop!

BREAKTHROUGH
IN PAPERMAKING

If hemp were legally cultivated using 21st century technology,
it would be the single largest agricultural crop in the United States and world
today!

In fact, when the preceding two articles were prepared early in
1937, hemp was still legal to grow.

And those who predicted billions of dollars in new cannabis
businesses did not consider income from medicines, energy (fuel) and food,
which would now add another trillion dollars or more annually to our coming
“natural” economy (compared to our synthetic, environmentally troubled
economy). Relaxational smoking would add only a relatively minor amount to this
figure.

The most important reason that the 1938 magazine articles
projected billions in new income was hemp for “pulp paper” (as opposed to fiber
or rag paper). Other reasons were for its fiber, seed and many other pulp uses.
If the hemp pulp paper process of 1916 were in use today, it could replace 40
to 70% of all pulp paper, including corrugated boxes, computer printout paper
and paper bags.

This remarkable new hemp pulp technology for paper making was
invented in 1916 by our own U.S. Department of Agriculture chief scientists,
botanist Lyster Dewey and chemist Jason Merrill.

This technology, coupled with the breakthrough of G. W.
Schlichten’s decorticating machine, patented in 1917, made hemp a viable paper
source at less than half the cost of tree-pulp paper.

The new harvesting machinery, along with Schlichten’s machine,
brought the processing of hemp down from 200 to 300 man-hours per acre to just
a couple of hours.* Twenty years later, advancing technology and the building
of new access roads made hemp even more valuable. Unfortunately, by then,
opposition forces had gathered steam and acted quickly to suppress hemp
cultivation.

*See Appendix I.

A PLAN TO SAVE OUR FORESTS

Some cannabis plant strains regularly reach tree-like heights of
20 feet or more in one growing season. The new paper process used hemp “hurds”,
77% of the hemp stalk’s weight, which was then a wasted byproduct of the fiber
stripping process.

In 1916,
USDA Bulletin No. 404 reported that one acre of cannabis hemp, in annual
rotation over a 20-year period, would produce as much pulp for paper as 4.1
acres of trees being cut down over the same 20-year period.

This process
would use only 1/7 to 1/4 as much polluting sulfur-based acid chemicals to
break down the glue-like lignin that binds the fibers of the pulp, or even none
at all using soda ash. All this lignin must be broken down to make pulp.

Hemp pulp is
only 4-10% lignin, while trees are 18-30% lignin. The problem of dioxin
contamination of rivers is avoided in the hemp papermaking process, which does
not need to use chlorine bleach (as the wood pulp papermaking process
requires), but instead substitutes safer hydrogen peroxide in the bleaching
process.

Thus, hemp
provides four times as much pulp with at least four to seven times less
pollution.

.

.

As we have seen, this hemp pulp-paper potential depended on the
invention and the engineering of new machines for stripping the hemp by modern
technology. This would also lower demand for lumber and reduce the cost of
housing, while at the same time helping re-oxygenate the planet.1

As an example: If the new (1916) hemp pulp paper process were in
use legally today, it would soon replace about 70 percent of all wood pulp
paper; including computer printout paper, corrugated boxes and paper bags.

Pulp paper made from 60-100 percent hemp hurds is stronger and
more flexible than paper made from wood pulp. Making paper from wood pulp
damages the environment. Hemp papermaking does not.

Reduction of the source of pollution, usually from manufacturing
with petrochemicals or their derivatives is a cost-cutting waste control method
often called for by environmentalists.

Whether the source of pollution is CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons)
from refrigeration, spray cans, computers, tritium and plutonium produced for
military uses, or the sulfuric acids used by papermakers, the goal is reducing
the source of pollution.

In the supermarket when you are asked to choose paper or plastic
for your bags, you are faced with an environmental dilemma: paper from trees
that were cut, or plastic bags made from fossil fuel and chemicals. With a
third choice available ~ hemp hurd paper ~ one could choose a biodegradable,
durable paper from an annually renewal source ~ the cannabis hemp plant.

The environmental advantages of harvesting hemp annually ~
leaving the trees in the ground! ~ For papermaking, and for replacing fossil
fuels as an energy source, have become crucial for the source reduction of
pollution.

A CONSPIRACY TO WIPE OUT THE NATURAL COMPETITION

In the
mid-1930s, when the new mechanical hemp fiber stripping machines and machines to
conserve hemp’s high-cellulose pulp finally became state-of-the art, available
and affordable, the enormous timber acreage and businesses of the Hearst Paper
Manufacturing Division, Kimberly Clark (USA), St. Regis ~ and virtually all
other timber, paper and large newspaper holding companies, stood to lose
billions of dollars and perhaps go bankrupt.

Coincidentally,
in 1937, DuPont had just patented processes for making plastics from oil and
coal, as well as a new sulfate/sulfite process for making paper from wood pulp.
According to DuPont’s own corporate records and historians,* these processes
accounted for over 80 percent of all the company’s railroad car loadings over
the next 60 years into the 1990s.

*Author’s research and communications with DuPont, 1985-1996.

If hemp had
not been made illegal, 80% of DuPont’s business would never have materialized
and the great majority of the pollution which has poisoned our Northwestern and
Southeastern rivers would not have occurred.

In an open
marketplace, hemp would have saved the majority of America’s vital family farms
and would probably have boosted their numbers, despite the Great Depression of
the 1930s.

But
competing against environmentally-sane hemp paper and natural plastic
technology would have jeopardized the lucrative financial schemes of Hearst,
DuPont and DuPont’s chief financial backer, Andrew Mellon of the Mellon Bank of
Pittsburgh.

“SOCIAL REORGANIZATION”

A series of secret meetings were held. In 1931, Mellon, in his
role as Hoover’s Secretary of the Treasury, appointed his future nephew-in-law,
Harry J. Anslinger, to be head of the newly reorganized Federal Bureau of
Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (FBNDD), a post he held for the next 31 years.

These industrial barons and financiers knew that machinery to
cut, bale, decorticate (separate the fiber from the high-cellulose hurd), and
process hemp into paper or plastics was becoming available in the mid-1930s.

Cannabis hemp would have to go.

In DuPont’s 1937 Annual Report to its stockholders, the company
strongly urged continued investment in its new, but not readily accepted,
petrochemical synthetic products. DuPont was anticipating “radical changes”
from “the revenue raising power of government … converted into an instrument for
forcing acceptance of sudden new ideas of industrial and social
reorganization.” *

“By the fall of 1936, Herman Oliphant (general counsel to the
Treasury Department) had decided to employ the taxing power [of the federal
government], but in a statute modeled after the National Firearms Act and
wholly unrelated to the 1914 Harrison [narcotics] Act. Oliphant himself was in
charge of preparing the bill. Anslinger directed his army to turn its campaign
toward Washington.

“The key departure of the marijuana tax scheme from that of the
Harrison Act is the notion of the prohibitive tax. Under the Harrison Act, a
non-medical user could not legitimately buy or possess narcotics. To the
dissenters in the Supreme Court decisions upholding the act, this clearly
demonstrated that Congress’ motive was to prohibit conduct rather than raise
revenue. So in the National Firearms Act, designed to prohibit traffic in
machine guns, Congress ‘permitted’ anyone to buy a machine gun, but required
him to pay a $200 transfer tax* and carry out the purchase on an order form.

“The Firearms Act, passed in June 1934, was the first act to
hide Congress’ motives behind a prohibitive tax. The Supreme Court unanimously
upheld the anti-machine gun law on March 29, 1937. Oliphant had undoubtedly
been awaiting the Court’s decision, and the Treasury Department introduced its
marihuana tax bill two weeks later, April 14, 1937.”

Thus, DuPont’s** decision to invest in new technologies based on
“forcing acceptance of sudden new ideas of industrial and social
reorganization” makes sense.

*About $5,000 in 1998 dollars.

** It’s interesting to note that on April 29, 1937, two weeks
after the Marihuana Tax Act was introduced, DuPont’s foremost scientist,
Wallace Hume Carothers, the inventor of Nylon for DuPont, the world’s
number-one organic chemist, committed suicide by drinking cyanide. Carothers
was dead at age 41…

A QUESTION OF MOTIVE

DuPont’s plans were alluded to during the 1937 Senate hearings
by Matt Rens, of Rens Hemp Company:

Mr. Rens: Such a tax would put all small producers out of the
business of growing hemp, and the proportion of small producers is considerable
… The real purpose of this bill is not to raise money, is it?

Senator Brown: Well, we’re sticking to the proposition that it
is.

Mr. Rens: It will cost a million.

Senator Brown: Thank you. (Witness dismissed.)

.

.

HEARST, HIS HATRED & HYSTERICAL LIES

Concern about the effects of hemp smoke had already led to two
major governmental studies. The British governor of India released the Report
of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission 1893-1894 on heavy bhang smokers in the
subcontinent.

And in 1930, the U.S. government sponsored the Siler Commission
study on the effects of off-duty smoking of marijuana by American servicemen in
Panama. Both reports concluded that marijuana was not a problem and recommended
that no criminal penalties apply to its use.

In early 1937, Assistant U.S. Surgeon General Walter Treadway
told the Cannabis Advisory Subcommittee of the League of Nations that,

“It may be
taken for a relatively long time without social or emotional breakdown.
Marihuana is habit-forming…in the same sense as … sugar or coffee.”

But other forces were at work. The war fury that led to the
Spanish American War in 1898 was ignited by William Randolph Hearst through his
nationwide chain of newspapers, and marked the beginning of “yellow
journalism”* as a force in American politics.

*Webster’s Dictionary defines “yellow journalism” as the use of
cheaply sensational or unscrupulous methods in newspapers and other media to attract
or influence the readers.

In the 1920s and ‘30s, Hearst’s newspapers deliberately
manufactured a new threat to America and a new yellow journalism campaign to
have hemp outlawed.

For example,
a story of a car accident in which a “marijuana cigarette” was found would
dominate the headlines for weeks, while alcohol-related car accidents (which
outnumbered marijuana-connected accidents by more than 10,000 to 1) made only
the back pages.

This same theme of marijuana leading to car accidents was burned
into the minds of Americans over and over again in the late 1930s by showing
marijuana-related car accident headlines in movies such as “Reefer Madness” and
“Marijuana ~ Assassin of Youth.”

BLATANT BIGOTRY

Starting with the 1898 Spanish American War, the Hearst
newspaper had denounced Spaniards, Mexican-Americans and Latinos.

After the seizure of 800,000 acres of Hearst’s prime Mexican
timberland by the “marihuana” smoking army of Pancho Villa,* these slurs
intensified.

*The song “La Cucaracha” tells the story of one of Villa’s men
looking for his stash of “marijuana por fumar!” (To smoke!)

Non-stop for the next three decades, Hearst painted a picture of
the lazy, pot-smoking Mexican, still one of our most insidious prejudices.
Simultaneously, he waged a similar racist smear campaign against the Chinese,
referring to them as the “Yellow Peril.”

From 1910 to 1920, Hearst’s newspapers would claim that the
majority of incidents in which blacks were said to have raped white women,
could be traced directly to cocaine. This continued for 10 years until Hearst
decided it was not “cocaine-crazed negroes” raping white women ~ it was now
“marijuana-crazed negroes” raping white women.

Hearst’s and other sensationalistic tabloids ran hysterical
headlines atop stories portraying “negroes” and Mexicans as frenzied beasts
who, under the influence of marijuana, would play anti-white “voodoo-satanic”
music (jazz) and heap disrespect and “viciousness” upon the predominantly white
readership.

Other such offenses resulting from this drug-induced “crime
wave” included: stepping on white men’s shadows, looking white people directly
in the eye for three seconds or more, looking at a white woman twice, laughing
at a white person, etc.

For such “crimes,” hundreds of thousands of Mexicans and blacks
spent, in aggregate, millions of years in jails, prisons and on chain gangs,
under brutal segregation laws that remained in effect throughout the U.S. until
the 1950s and ‘60s.

Hearst, through pervasive and repetitive use, pounded the obscure
Mexican slang word “marijuana” into the English-speaking American
consciousness. Meanwhile, the word “hemp” was discarded and “cannabis,” the
scientific term, was ignored and buried.

The actual Spanish word for hemp is “cáñamo.” But using a
Mexican “Sonoran” colloquialism ~ marijuana, often Americanized as “marihuana” ~
guaranteed that few would realize that the proper terms for one of the chief
natural medicines, “cannabis,” and for the premiere industrial resource,
“hemp,” had been pushed out of the language.

THE PROHIBITIVE MARIJUANA TAX

In the secret Treasury Department meetings conducted between
1935 and 1937, prohibitive tax laws were drafted and strategies plotted.
“Marijuana” was not banned outright; the law called for an “occupational excise
tax upon dealers, and a transfer tax upon dealings in marijuana.”

Importers, manufacturers, sellers and distributors were required
to register with the Secretary of the Treasury and pay the occupational tax.
Transfers were taxed at $1 an ounce; $100 an ounce if the dealer was
unregistered. The new tax doubled the price of the legal “raw drug” cannabis
which at the time sold for one dollar an ounce.2 The year was 1937. New York
State had exactly one narcotics officer.*

*New York currently has a network of thousands of narcotics
officers, agents, spies and paid informants ~ and 20 times the penal capacity
it had in 1937, although the state’s population has only doubled since then.

After the Supreme Court decision of March 29, 1937, upholding
the prohibition of machine guns through taxation, Herman Oliphant made his
move. On April 14, 1937 he introduced the bill directly to the House Ways and
Means Committee instead of to other appropriate committees such as food and
drug, agriculture, textiles, commerce, etc.

His reason may have been that “Ways and Means” is the only
committee that can send its bills directly to the House floor without being
subject to debate by other committees. Ways and Means Chairman Robert L.
Doughton,* a key DuPont ally, quickly rubber-stamped the secret Treasury bill
and sent it sailing through Congress to the President.

*Colby, Jerry, The DuPont Dynasties, Lyle Stewart, 1984.

.

.

“DID ANYONE CONSULT THE AMA?”

However, even within his controlled Committee hearings, many
expert witnesses spoke out against the passage of these unusual tax laws.

Dr. William C. Woodward, for instance, who was both a physician
and an attorney for the American Medical Association, testified on behalf of
the AMA.

He said, in effect, the entire fabric of federal testimony was
tabloid sensationalism! No real testimony had been heard! This law, passed in
ignorance, could possibly deny the world a potential medicine, especially now
that the medical world was just beginning to find which ingredients in cannabis
were active.

Woodward told the committee that the only reason the AMA hadn’t
come out against the marijuana tax law sooner was that marijuana had been
described in the press for 20 years as “killer weed from Mexico.”

The AMA doctors had just realized “two days before” these spring
1937 hearings, that the plant Congress intended to outlaw was known medically
as cannabis, the benign substance used in America with perfect safety in scores
of illnesses for over one hundred years.

“We cannot understand yet, Mr. Chairman,” Woodward protested,
“why this bill should have been prepared in secret for two years without any
intimation, even to the profession, that it was being prepared.” He and the
AMA* were quickly denounced by Anslinger and the entire congressional
committee, and curtly excused.3

* The AMA and the Roosevelt Administration were strong
antagonists in 1937.

When the Marijuana Tax Act bill came up for oral report,
discussion, and vote on the floor of Congress, only one pertinent question was
asked from the floor: “Did anyone consult with the AMA and get their opinion?”
Representative Vinson, answering for the Ways and Means Committee replied,
“Yes, we have. A Dr. Wharton [mistaken pronunciation of Woodward?] and [the
AMA] are in complete agreement!”

With this memorable lie, the bill passed, and became law in
December, 1937. Federal and state police forces were created, which have
incarcerated hundreds of thousands of Americans, adding up to more than 16
million wasted years in jails and prisons – even contributing to their deaths –
all for the sake of poisonous, polluting industries, prison guards unions and
to reinforce some white politicians’ policies of racial hatred.

Also lobbying against the Tax Act with all its energy was the
National Oil Seed Institute, representing the high-quality machine lubrication
producers as well as paint manufacturers. Speaking to the House Ways and Means
Committee in 1937, their general counsel, Ralph Loziers, testified eloquently
about the hempseed oil that was to be, in effect, outlawed:

“Respectable
authorities tell us that in the Orient, at least 200 million people use this
drug; and when we take into consideration that for hundreds, yes, thousands of
years, practically that number of people have been using this drug. It is
significant that in Asia and elsewhere in the Orient, where poverty stalks
abroad on every hand and where they draw on all the plant resources which a
bountiful nature has given that domain ~ it is significant that none of those
200 million people has ever, since the dawn of civilization, been found using
the seed of this plant or using the oil as a drug.

“Now, if
there were any deleterious properties or principles in the seed or oil, it is
reasonable to suppose that these Orientals, who have been reaching out in their
poverty for something that would satisfy their morbid appetite, would have
discovered it….

“If the
committee please, the hempseed, or the seed of the cannabis sativa l., is used
in all the Oriental nations and also in a part of Russia as food. It is grown
in their fields and used as oatmeal. Millions of people every day are using
hempseed in the Orient as food. They have been doing that for many generations,
especially in periods of famine….The point I make is this ~ that this bill is
too all inclusive.

This bill is a world encircling measure. This bill brings
the activities ~ the crushing of this great industry under the supervision of a
bureau ~ which may mean its suppression. Last year, there was imported into the
U.S. 62,813,000 pounds of hempseed. In 1935 there was imported 116 million
pounds…”

PROTECTING SPECIAL INTERESTS

As the AMA’s Dr. Woodward had asserted, the government’s
testimony before Congress in 1937 had, in fact, consisted almost entirely of
Hearst’s and other sensational and racist newspaper articles read aloud by
Harry J. Anslinger,* director of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (FBN). (This
agency has since evolved into the Drug Enforcement Administration [DEA]).

*Harry J. Anslinger was director of the new Federal Bureau of
Narcotics from its inception in 1931 for the next 31 years, and was only forced
into retirement in 1962 by President John F. Kennedy after Anslinger tried to
censor the publications and publishers of Professor Alfred Lindesmith (“The
Addict and the Law”, Washington Post, 1961) and to blackmail and harass his
employer, Indiana University. Anslinger had come under attack for racist
remarks as early as 1934 by a U.S. senator from Pennsylvania, Joseph Guffey,
for such things as referring to “ginger-colored niggers” in letters circulated
to his department heads on FBN stationery.

Prior to 1931, Anslinger was Assistant U.S. Commissioner for
Prohibition. Anslinger, remember, was hand-picked to head the new Federal
Bureau of Narcotics by his uncle-in-law, Andrew Mellon, Secretary of the
Treasury under President Herbert Hoover. The same Andrew Mellon was also the
owner and largest stockholder of the sixth largest bank (in 1937) in the United
States, the Mellon Bank in Pittsburgh, one of only two bankers for DuPont* from
1928 to the present.

*DuPont has borrowed money from banks only twice in its entire
190-year history, once to buy control of General Motors in the 1920s. Its
banking business is the prestigious plum of the financial world.

In 1937, Anslinger testified before Congress saying, “Marijuana
is the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind.”

This, along with Anslinger’s outrageous racist statements and
beliefs, was made to the southern-dominated congressional committee and is now
an embarrassment to read in its entirety.

For instance, Anslinger kept a “Gore File,” culled almost
entirely from Hearst and other sensational tabloids ~ e.g., stories of axe murders,
where one of the participants reportedly smoked a joint four days before
committing the crime.

Anslinger pushed on Congress as a factual statement that about
50% of all violent crimes committed in the U.S. were committed by Spaniards,
Mexican-Americans, Latin Americans, Filipinos, African-Americans and Greeks,
and these crimes could be traced directly to marijuana.

Not one of Anslinger’s marijuana “Gore Files” of the 1930s is
believed to be true by scholars who have painstakingly checked the facts.4

SELF-PERPETUATING LIES

In fact, FBI statistics, had Anslinger bothered to check, showed
at least 65-75% of all murders in the U.S. were then ~ and still are ~ alcohol
related. As an example of his racist statements, Anslinger read into U.S.
Congressional testimony (without objection) stories about “coloreds” with big
lips, luring white women with jazz music and marijuana. He read an account of
two black students at the University of Minnesota doing this to a white coed
“with the result of pregnancy.”

The congressmen of 1937 gasped at this and at the fact that this
drug seemingly caused white women to touch or even look at a “negro.”

Virtually no
one in America other than a handful of rich industrialists and their hired cops
knew that their chief potential competitor ~ hemp ~ was being outlawed under
the name “marijuana.”

That’s right. Marijuana was most likely just a pretext for hemp
prohibition and economic suppression.

The water was further muddied by the confusion of marijuana with
“loco weed” (Jimson Weed). The situation was not clarified by the press, which
continued to print the misinformation into the 1960s.

At the dawn of the 1990s, the most extravagant and ridiculous
attacks on the hemp plant drew national media attention–such as a study widely
reported by health journals* in 1989 that claimed marijuana smokers put on
about a half a pound of weight per day. Now in 2007, they just want to duck the
issue.

*American Health, July/August 1989.

Meanwhile, serious discussions of the health, civil liberties
and economic aspects of the hemp issue are frequently dismissed as being
nothing but an “excuse so that people can smoke pot” ~ as if people need an
excuse to state the facts about any matter.

One must concede that, as a tactic, lying to the public about
the beneficial nature of hemp and confusing them as to its relationship with
“marijuana” has been very successful.

The late 1920s and 1930s saw continuing consolidation of power
into the hands of a few large steel, oil and chemical (munitions) companies.
The U.S. federal government placed much of the textile production for the
domestic economy in the hands of its chief munitions maker, DuPont.

The processing of nitrating cellulose into explosives is very
similar to the process for nitrating cellulose into synthetic fibers and
plastics. Rayon, the first synthetic fiber, is simply stabilized guncotton, or
nitrated cloth, the basic explosive of the 19th century.

“Synthetic plastics find application in fabricating a wide
variety of articles, many of which in the past were made from natural
products,” beamed Lammot DuPont (Popular Mechanics, June 1939).

DuPont’s scientists were the world’s leading researchers into
the processes of nitrating cellulose and were in fact the largest processor of
cellulose in the nation in this era.

The February 1938 Popular Mechanics article stated “Thousands of
tons of hemp hurds are used every year by one large powder company for the
manufacture of dynamite and TNT.” History shows that DuPont had largely
cornered the market in explosives by buying up and consolidating the smaller
blasting companies in the late 1800s. By 1902 it controlled about two-thirds of
industry output.

They were the largest powder company, supplying 40% of the
munitions for the allies in WWI. As cellulose and fiber researchers, DuPont’s chemists
knew hemp’s true value better than anyone else. The value of hemp goes far
beyond line fibers; although recognized for linen, canvas, netting and cordage,
these long fibers are only 20% of the hemp stalk’s weight. Eighty percent of
the hemp is in the 77% cellulose hurd, and this was the most abundant, cleanest
resource of cellulose (fiber) for paper, plastics and even rayon.

The empirical evidence in this book shows that the federal
government – through the 1937 Marijuana Tax Act – allowed this munitions maker
to supply synthetic fibers for the domestic economy without competition. The
proof of a successful conspiracy among these corporate and governing interests
is simply this: in 1997 DuPont was still the largest producer of man-made
fibers, while no American citizen has legally harvested a single acre of
textile grade hemp in over 60 years (except during the period of WWII).

An almost unlimited tonnage of natural fiber and cellulose would
have become available to the American farmer in 1937, the year DuPont patented
Nylon and the polluting wood-pulp paper sulfide process. All of hemp’s
potential value was lost.

Simple plastics of the early 1900s were made of nitrated
cellulose, directly related to DuPont’s munitions-making process. Celluloid,
acetate and rayon were the simple plastics of that era, and hemp was well known
to cellulose researchers as the premier resource for this new industry to use.
Worldwide, the raw material of simple plastics, rayon and paper could be best
supplied by hemp hurds.

Nylon fibers were developed between 1926-1937 by the noted
Harvard chemist Wallace Carothers, working from German patents. These
polyamides are long fibers based on observed natural products. Carothers,
supplied with an open-ended research grant from DuPont, made a comprehensive
study of natural cellulose fibers. He duplicated natural fibers in his labs and
polyamides ~ long fibers of a specific chemical process ~ were developed.
(Curiously, Wallace Carothers committed suicide in April of 1937, one week after
the House Ways and Means Committee had the hearings on cannabis and created the
bill that would eventually outlaw hemp.)

Coal tar and petroleum-based chemicals were employed, and
different devices, spinnerets and processes were patented. This new type of
textile, Nylon, was to be controlled from the raw material stage, as coal, to
the completed product: a patented chemical product. The chemical company
centralized the production and profits of the new “miracle” fiber. The
introduction of Nylon, the introduction of high-volume machinery to separate
hemp’s long fiber from the cellulose hurd, and the outlawing of hemp as
“marijuana” all occurred simultaneously.

The new man-made fibers (MMFs) can best be described as war
material. The fiber-making process has become one based on big factories,
smokestacks, coolants and hazardous chemicals, rather than one of stripping out
the abundant, naturally available fibers.

Coming from a history of making explosives and munitions, the
old “chemical dye plants” now produce hosiery, mock linens, mock canvas, latex
paint and synthetic carpets. Their polluting factories make imitation leather,
upholstery and wood surfaces, while an important part of the natural cycle
stands outlawed.

The standard fiber of world history, America’s traditional crop,
hemp, could provide our textiles and paper and be the premier source for
cellulose. The war industries – DuPont, Allied Chemical, Monsanto, etc., – are
protected from competition by the marijuana laws. They made war on the natural cycle
and the common farmer.

“Should we believe self-serving, ever-growing drug
enforcement/drug treatment bureaucrats, whose pay and advancement depend on
finding more and more people to arrest and ‘treat’?

“More Americans die in just one day in prisons, penitentiaries,
jails and stockades than have ever died from marijuana throughout history. Who
are they protecting? From what?” ~ Fred Oerther, MD, Portland, Oregon

MOVING TO CRUSH DISSENT

After the 1938-1944 New York City ”LaGuardia Marijuana Report”
refuted his argument, by reporting that marijuana caused no violence at all and
citing other positive results, Harry J. Anslinger, in public tirade after
tirade, denounced Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia, the New York Academy of Medicine
and the doctors who researched the report.

Anslinger proclaimed that these doctors would never again do
marijuana experiments or research without his personal permission, or be sent
to jail!

He then used the full power of the United States government,
illegally, to halt virtually all research into marijuana while he blackmailed
the American Medical Association (AMA)* into denouncing the New York Academy of
Medicine and its doctors for the research they had done.

*Why, you ask, was the AMA now on Anslinger’s side in 1944-45,
after being against the Marijuana Tax Act in 1937? Answer: Since Anslinger’s
FBN was responsible for prosecuting doctors who prescribed narcotic drugs for
what he, Anslinger, deemed illegal purposes, they (the FBN) had prosecuted more
than 3,000 AMA doctors for illegal prescriptions through 1939. In 1939, the AMA
made specific peace with Anslinger on marijuana. The results: Only three
doctors were prosecuted for illegal drugs of any sort from 1939 to 1949.

To refute the LaGuardia report, the AMA, at Anslinger’s personal
request, conducted a 1944-45 study; “of the experimental group 34 were Negroes
and one was white” (for statistical control) who smoked marijuana, became
disrespectful of white soldiers and officers in the segregated military. (See
Appendix, “Army Study of Marijuana,” Newsweek, Jan. 15, 1945.)

This technique of biasing the outcome of a study is known among
researchers as “gutter science.”

POT AND THE THREAT OF PEACE

However, from 1948 to 1950, Anslinger stopped feeding the press
the story that marijuana was violence-causing and began “red baiting,” typical
of the McCarthy era.

Now the frightened American public was told that this was a much
more dangerous drug than he originally thought. Testifying before a strongly
anti-Communist Congress in 1948 ~ and thereafter continually to the press ~ Anslinger
proclaimed that marijuana rendered its users noT violent at all, but so
peaceful ~ and pacifistic! ~ that the Communists could and would use marijuana
to weaken our American fighting men’s will to fight.

This was a 180-degree turn-around of the original pretext on
which “violence-causing” cannabis was outlawed in 1937. Undaunted, however,
Congress now voted to continue the marijuana law ~ based on the exact opposite
reasoning they had used to outlaw cannabis in the first place.

It is interesting and even absurd to note that Anslinger and his
biggest supporters ~ southern congressmen and his best senatorial friend,
Senator Joseph McCarthy* of Wisconsin ~ from 1948 on, constantly received press
coverage on the scare.

*According to Anslinger’s autobiographical book, The Murderers,
and confirmed by former FBN agents, Anslinger had been supplying morphine
illegally to a U.S. senator ~ Joseph McCarthy ~ for years.

The reason given by Anslinger in his book? So the Communists
would not be able to blackmail this great American Senator for his
drug-dependency weakness. (Dean Latimer, Flowers In The Blood; Harry Anslinger,
The Murderers.)

Anslinger told congress the Communists would sell marijuana to
group as America’s first truth American boys to sap their will to fight ~ to
make us a nation of zombie pacifists. Of course, the Communists of Russia and
China ridiculed this U. S. marijuana paranoia every chance they got ~ in the
press and at the United Nations.

Unfortunately, the idea of pot and pacifism got so much
sensational world press for the next 20 years that eventually Russia, China,
and the Eastern Bloc Communist countries (that grew large amounts of cannabis)
outlawed marijuana for fear that America would sell it or use it to make the
communist soldiers docile and pacifistic.

This was strange because Russia, Eastern Europe, and China had
been growing and ingesting cannabis as a medical drug, relaxant and work tonic
for hundreds and even thousands of years, with no thought of marijuana laws.

(The J.V. Dialogue Soviet Press Digest, Oct., 1990 reported a
flourishing illegal hemp business, despite the frantic efforts by Soviet law
enforcement agencies to stamp it out. “In Kirghizia alone, hemp plantations
occupy some 3,000 hectares.” In another area, Russians are traveling three days
into “one of the more sinister places in the Moiyn-Kumy desert,” to harvest a
special high-grade, drought resistant variety of hemp known locally as anasha.)

A SECRET PROGRAM TO CONTROL MINDS AND CHOICES

Through a report released in 1983 under the Freedom of
Information Act, it was discovered (after 40 years of secrecy) that Anslinger
was appointed in 1942 to a top-secret committee to create a “truth serum” for
the Office of Strategic Service (OSS), which evolved into the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). (Rolling Stone, August 1983.)

Anslinger and his spy group picked, as America’s first truth
serum, “honey oil”, a much purer, almost tasteless form of hash oil, to be
administered in food to spies, saboteurs, military prisoners and the like, to
make them unwittingly “spill the truth.”)

Fifteen months later, in 1943, marijuana extracts were
discontinued by Anslinger’s group as America’s first truth serum because it was
noted that they didn’t work all the time.

The people being interrogated would often giggle or laugh
hysterically at their captors, get paranoid, or have insatiable desires for
food (the munchies?). Also, the reported noted that American OSS agents and
other interrogation groups started using the honey oil illegally themselves,
and would not give it to the spies.

In Anslinger’s OSS group’s final report on marijuana as a truth
serum, there was no mention of violence caused by the drug! In fact, the
opposite was indicated. The OSS and later the CIA continued the search and tried
other drugs as truth serum; psilocybin or amanita muscaria mushrooms and LSD,
to name a few.

For twenty years, the CIA secretly tested these concoctions on
American agents. Unsuspecting subjects jumped from buildings, or thought they’d
gone insane.

Our government finally admitted doing all this to its own people
in the 1970s, after 25 years of denials: drugging innocent, non-consenting,
unaware citizens, soldiers and government agents – all in the name of national
security, of course.

These American “security” agencies constantly threatened and
even occasionally imprisoned individuals, families and organizations that
suggested the druggings had ever occurred.

It was three decades before the Freedom of Information Act
forced the CIA to admit its lies through exposure on TV by CBS’s “60 Minutes”
and others. However, on April 16, 1985 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the
CIA did not have to reveal the identities of either the individuals or
institutions involved in this travesty.

The court said, in effect, that the CIA could decide what was or
was not to be released under the Freedom of Information Act, and that the
courts could not overrule the agency’s decision.

As an aside, repealing this Freedom of Information Act was one
of the prime goals of the Reagan/Bush/Quayle Administration.

Before Anslinger started the pacifist zombie-marijuana scare in
1948, he publicly used jazz music, violence, and the “gore files” for five to
seven more years (1943-50) in the press, at conventions, lectures, and
congressional hearings.

We now know that on the subject of hemp, disguised as marijuana,
Anslinger was a bureaucratic police liar.

For more than 70 years now Americans have been growing up with
and accepting Anslinger’s statements on the herb ~ from violence to evil
pacifism and finally to the corrupting influence of music.

Whether this was economically or racially inspired, or even
because of up-beat music or some kind of synergistic (combined) hysteria, is
impossible to know for sure. But we do know that for the U.S. government, e.g.,
DEA, information disseminated on cannabis was then, and continues to be, a
deliberate deception.

As you will see in the following chapters, the weight of
empirical fact and large amounts of corroborating evidence indicate that the
former Reagan/Bush/Quayle administrations, along with their unique
pharmaceutical connections, have probably conspired at the highest levels to
withhold information and to misinform the public, resulting in the avoidable
and needless deaths of tens of thousands of Americans.

And they did
it, it seems, intending to save their own investment ~ and their friends’ ~ in
the pharmaceutical, energy and paper industries; and to give these poisonous,
synthetic industries an insane advantage over natural hemp and protect the
billions of dollars in annual profits that they stood to lose if the hemp plant
and marijuana were not prohibited!

As a result, millions of Americans have wasted millions of years
in jail time, and millions of lives have been and continue to be ruined by what
started out as Hearst’s, Anslinger’s and DuPont’s shameful economic lies,
vicious racial libels and bigoted musical taste.

.

CHAPTER
6 ~ THE BODY OF MEDICAL LITERATURE ON CANNABIS MEDICINE

Our authority here is the ‘Body of Literature,’ starting with
ancient materia medicae:

Chinese and Hindu pharmacopoeia and Near Eastern cuneiform
tablets, and continuing all the way into this century, including the 1966-76
U.S. renaissance of cannabis studies ~ some 10,000 separate studies on
medicines and effects from the hemp plant.

Comprehensive compendia of these works are designated as the
prime sources for this medical chapter, as well as ongoing interviews with many
researchers.

AFFORDABLE, AVAILABLE HERBAL HEALTH CARE

For more than 3,500 years, cannabis/hemp/marijuana has been,
depending on the culture or nation, either the most used or one of the most
widely used plants for medicines. This includes: China, India, the Middle and
Near East, Africa, and pre-Roman Catholic Europe (prior to 476 A.D.).

Dr. Raphael Mechoulam, NORML, High Times and Omni magazine
(September 1982) all indicate that, if marijuana were legal it would
immediately replace 10-20% of all pharmaceutical prescription medicines (based
on research through 1976). And probably, Mechoulam estimates, 40-50% of all
medicines, including patent medicines, could contain some extract from the
cannabis plant when fully researched.

Marijuana was America’s number-one analgesic for 60 years before
the rediscovery of aspirin around 1900. From 1842 to 1900, cannabis made up
half of all medicine sold, with virtually no fear of its high.

The 1839 report on the uses of cannabis by Dr. W.B.
O’Shaugnessy, one of the most respected members of the Royal Academy of
Science, was just as important to mid-19th century Western medicine as the
discoveries of antibiotics (like penicillin and Terramycin) were to mid-20th
century medicine.

In fact, the Committee on Cannabis Indica for the Ohio State
Medical Society concluded that “High Biblical commentators [scholars]” believe
“that the gall and vinegar, or myrrhed wine, offered to our Saviour immediately
before his crucifixion was, in all probability, a preparation of Indian hemp.”

From 1850 to 1937, the U. S. Pharmacopoeia listed cannabis as
the primary medicine for more than 100 separate illnesses or diseases.

During all this time (pre-1000 B.C. to 1940s A.D.), researchers,
doctors and drug manufacturers (Eli Lilly, Parke-Davis, Squibb, etc.) had no
idea what the active ingredients of cannabis were until Dr. Mechoulam
discovered THC in 1964.

20TH AND 21ST CENTURY RESEARCH

As outlined in the previous chapters, the American Medical
Association (AMA) and drug companies testified against the l937 Marijuana Tax
Act because cannabis was known to have so much medical potential and had never
caused any observable addictions or death by overdose.

The possibility existed, they argued, that once the active
ingredients in cannabis (such as THC Delta-9) were isolated and correct dosages
established, cannabis could become a miracle drug.

Twenty-nine years would pass, however, before American
scientists could begin to even look into cannabis medicine again.

THC Delta-9 was isolated by Dr. Raphael Mechoulam at the
University of Tel Aviv in 1964. His work confirmed that of Professor Taylor of
Princeton, who had lead the research and identification of natural THC Delta-9
precursors in the 1930s. Kahn, Adams and Loewe also worked with the structure
of cannabis’ active ingredientsin1944.

Since 1964, more than 400 separate compounds have been isolated
in cannabis from over a thousand suspected compounds. At least 60 of the
isolated compounds are therapeutic. The United States, however, forbade this
type of research through the bureaucratic authority of Harry Anslinger until
1962, when he was forced to retire. (Omni magazine, Sept. 1982.)

GROWING ACCEPTANCE

By 1966, millions of young Americans had begun using marijuana.
Concerned parents and government, wanting to know the dangers their children
were risking, started funding dozens and later hundreds of marijuana health
studies.

Entrenched in the older generation’s minds were 30 years of
Anslinger/Hearst scare stories of murder, atrocity, rape, and even zombie
pacifism.

Federally sponsored research results began to ease Americans’
fears of cannabis causing violence or zombie pacifism, and hundreds of new
studies suggested that hidden inside the hemp plant’s chemistry lay a medicinal
array of incredible therapeutic potential. The government funded more and more
studies.

Soon, legions of American researchers had positive indications
using cannabis for asthma, glaucoma, nausea from chemotherapy, anorexia, tumors
and epilepsy, as well as for a general-use antibiotic. Cumulative findings
showed evidence of favorable results occurring in cases of Alzheimer’s disease,
Sickle Cell Anemia, Parkinson’s disease, anorexia, multiple sclerosis and
muscular dystrophy; plus thousands of anecdotal stories, all merited further
clinical study.

Prior to 1976, reports of positive effects and new therapeutic
indications for cannabis were almost a weekly occurrence in medical journals
and the national press.

NATIONAL CONFERENCE PRAISED CANNABIS THERAPY POTENTIAL

In November1975, virtually all of America’s leading researchers
on marijuana met at Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, California.
Seminars were sponsored by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) to
address a compendium of studies from their earliest to most recent findings.

When the seminars were over, practically all the scientists
concluded that the federal government, with the hard evidence collected so far
on the therapeutic potential of marijuana, should be rushing to invest tax
money into more research.

They felt the taxpayers should be informed that there was every
legitimate reason for the field of public health to continue large scale
research on cannabis medicine and therapies. All the participants, it seems,
believed this. Many of them (such as Mechoulam) believed that cannabis would be
one of the world’s major medicines by the mid-1980s. In March 1997, Mechoulam,
in a speech at the Bio-Fach in Frankfurt, Germany, still believed that cannabis
is the world’s best overall medicine. In 2006 Mechoulam started using cannabis
to treat Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

MARIJUANA RESEARCH BANNED

However, in 1976, just as multi-disciplined marijuana research
should have been going into its second, third, and fourth-generation studies
(see Therapeutic Potential of Marijuana and NORML federal files), a ”surprise”
United States government policy again forbade all promising federal research
into marijuana’s therapeutic effects.

This time, the research ban was accomplished when American
pharmaceutical companies successfully petitioned the federal government to be
allowed to finance and judge 100% of the research.

The previous 10 years of research had indicated a tremendous
promise for the therapeutic uses of natural cannabis, and this potential was
quietly turned over to corporate hands ~ not for the benefit of the public, but
to suppress the medical information.

This plan, the drug manufacturers petitioned, would allow our
private drug companies time to come up with patentable synthetics of the
cannabis molecules at no cost to the federal government, and a promise of “no
highs.”

In 1976, the Ford Administration, NIDA and the DEA said, in
effect, no American independent (read: university) research or federal health
program would be allowed to again investigate natural cannabis derivatives for
medicine. This agreement was made without any safeguards guaranteeing integrity
on the part of the pharmaceutical companies; they were allowed to regulate
themselves.

Private pharmaceutical corporations were allowed to do some “no
high” research, but it would be only Delta-9THC research, not any of the 400
other potentially therapeutic isomers in cannabis.

Research revealed positive indications when using cannabis for
asthma, glaucoma, nausea from chemotherapy, anorexia and tumors, as well as a
general use antibiotic; epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis,
muscular dystrophy, migraines, etc.~ all these merited further clinical
studies.

Why did the drug companies conspire to take over marijuana
research? Because U.S. government research (1966-1976) had indicated or confirmed
through hundreds of studies that even “natural” crude cannabis was the “best
and safest medicine of choice” for many serious health problems.

1988: DEA JUDGE RULES THAT CANNABIS HAS MEDICAL VALUE

The DEA’s own conservative administrative law judge, Francis
Young, after taking medical testimony for 15 days and reviewing hundreds of
DEA/NIDA documents positioned against the evidence introduced by marijuana
reform activists, concluded in September 1988 that “marijuana is one of the
safest therapeutically active substances known to man.”

But despite this preponderance of evidence, then DEA Director
John Lawn ordered on December 30, 1989 that cannabis remain listed as a
Schedule I narcotic ~ having no known medical use. His successor, Robert
Bonner, who was appointed by Bush and kept in office by Clinton, was even more
draconian in his approach to hemp/marijuana as medicine. Bush, Sr., Clinton and
Bush, Jr.’s DEA administrators have all upheld policies far worse even than
Bonner’s.

So…if all this has been known since 1975, what is our government
waiting for?

2007: DEA JUDGE RULES AGAINST THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S MONOPOLY ON POT
PRODUCTION

Washington, DC: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
Administrative Law Judge Mary Ellen Bittner ruled February 12th, 2007 that the
private production of cannabis for research purposes is “in the public
interest.” Her ruling affirms that the DEA, in 2004, improperly rejected an
application from the University of Massachusetts (UMass) at Amherst to
manufacture cannabis for FDA-approved research.

PROTECTING PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES’ PROFITS

NORML, High Times and Omni (September 1982) indicate that Eli
Lilly, Abbott Labs, Pfizer, Smith, Kline & French, and others would lose
hundreds of millions, to billions of dollars annually, and lose even more
billions in Third World countries, if marijuana were legal in the U.S.*

*Remember, in 1976, the last year of the Ford Administration,
these drug companies, through their own persistence (specifically by intense
lobbying) got the federal government to cease all positive research into
medical marijuana. It’s still the same in 2007.

PUTTING THE FOX INTO THE HEALTH CARE CHICKEN COOP

The drug companies took over all research and financing into
analogs of synthetic THC, CBD, CBN, etc., promising “no high” before allowing
the products on the market. Eli Lilly came out with Nabilone and later Marinol,
synthetic second cousins of THC Delta 9, and promised the government great
results.

Omni magazine, in 1982, stated that after nine years, Nabilone
was still considered virtually useless when compared with real, home-grown
THC-rich cannabis buds; and Marinol works as well as marijuana in only 13% of
patients.

Marijuana users mostly agree, they do not like the effects of
Lilly’s Nabilone or Marinol. Why? You have to get three or four times as high
on Marinol to sometimes get the same benefits as smoking good cannabis bud.

Omni also stated in 1982 (and it’s still true in 2007) that
after tens of millions of dollars and nine years of research on medical
marijuana synthetics, “these drug companies are totally unsuccessful,” even
though raw, organic cannabis is a “superior medicine” which works so well
naturally, on so many different illnesses.

Omni also suggested the drug companies petition the government
to allow “crude drug extracts” on the market in the real interest of public
health. The government and the drug companies, to date, have not responded. Or
rather, they have responded by ignoring it. However, the Reagan/Bush/Clinton
administrations absolutely refused to allow resumption of real (university)
cannabis research, except under synthetic pharmaceutical studies.

Omni suggests, and NORML and High Times concur, the reason the
drug companies and Reagan/ Bush , Sr./Clinton/Bush, Jr. have wanted only
synthetic THC legal is that simple extractions of the hundreds of ingredients
from the cannabis crude drug would be enjoyed without pharmaceutical company
patents which generate windfall monopolized profits.

UNDERMINING THE NATURAL MEDICINE’S COMPETITION

Eli Lilly, Pfizer and others stand to lose at least a third of
their entire, highly profitable, patent monopoly on such drugs as Darvon,
Tuinal, Seconal, and Prozac (as well as other patented medications ranging from
muscle ointments to burn ointments, to thousands of other products) because of
a plant anyone can grow: cannabis hemp.

Isn’t it curious that American drug companies and pharmacist
groups* supply almost half the funding for the 4,000 “Families Against
Marijuana” type organizations in America? The other half is supplied by Action
(a federal VISTA agency) and by tobacco companies like Philip Morris, and by
liquor and beer makers like Anheuser Busch, Coors, etc., or as a “public service”
by the ad agencies that represent them.

*Pharmacists against Drug Abuse, etc. See appendices.

POISONING THE THIRD WORLD

Colombia’s largest newspaper, Periodical el Tiempo (Bogota),
reported in 1983 that these same anti-marijuana crusading American
pharmaceutical companies are guilty of a practice known as “product dumping,”
wherein they “sell on the over-the-counter markets of Colombia, Mexico, Panama,
Chile, El Salvador, Honduras and Nicaragua, over 150 different illegal,
dangerous drugs.” This report has not been disputed by the U.S. government or
American pharmaceutical companies and the practice continues in 2007.

Some of these drugs have been forbidden by the FDA for sale or
use in the U.S. or its counterparts in Europe because they are known to cause
malnutrition, deformities and cancer. Yet they are sold over-the-counter to
unsuspecting foreign consumers!

The World Health Organization backs up this story with a
conservative estimate: they say that some 500,000 people are poisoned each year
in Third World countries by items (drugs, pesticides, etc.) sold by American
companies but which are banned from sale in the U.S.*

Some 10,000 studies have been done on cannabis, 4,000 in the
U.S., and only about a dozen have shown any negative results and these have
never been replicated. The Reagan/Bush Administration put a soft “feeler” out
in September of 1983 for all American universities and researchers to destroy
all 1966-76 cannabis research work, including compendiums in libraries.

Scientists and doctors so ridiculed this unparalleled censorship
move that the plans were dropped…for the moment.

However, we know that large amounts of information have since
disappeared, including the original copy of the USDA’s own pro-marijuana film
Hemp for Victory. Worse yet, even the merest mention of the film was removed
from the official record back to 1958, and has had to be painstakingly
reestablished as part of our national archives. Many archival and resource
copies of USDA Bulletin 404 has disappeared. How many other such priceless
historical documents have already been lost?

In late 1995 and early 1996, Dennis Peron, founder of the Cannabis
Buyers’ Club in San Francisco, gave California voters Proposition 215, a
statewide initiative to make cannabis legal as medicine. The medical marijuana
initiative collected 750,000 signatures, made the California ballot and it
passed by 56% of the vote in November 1996. Now, in 2007, hundreds of thousands
of Californians are growing medical marijuana legally. Nonetheless, the federal
government, in clear opposition to the people’s mandate, has found ways to
harass and close down many of the 600 + cannabis buyers’/cultivators’ clubs
including Peron’s.

Interestingly, in 1996, more voters in California voted for
medical marijuana than voted for Bill Clinton.

In August of 1997, almost one full year after the passage of
Proposition 215 by the majority vote, an LA Times poll found that more than 67%
of Californians would vote for it – an increase of 11% in the first year.

In February of 2007, a Lou Dobbs CNN poll showed that 79% of
Americans believe marijuana should be legalized. (20,146 voted)

An MSNBC Live Vote asked in April of 2007, “Do you believe
President Bush’s actions justify impeachment?” 87% voted yes. (425,127 voted)
Californians taking advantage of the new medical marijuana law include police
officers, district attorneys and mayors. Some of the same people who formerly
arrested and prosecuted citizens for marijuana, medical or otherwise, are now
using it themselves or for their families in ever increasing numbers.

Upon reentering the United States from Canada, in March of 1998,
California resident Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, the highest-scoring professional
basketball player in history, was busted for possession of a small amount of
marijuana. He paid a $500 fine to U.S. Customs and explained to the press that,
as a California citizen, he had a doctor’s recommendation to use medical
marijuana.

Professional and collegiate athletes who live in California and
have a doctor’s recommendation for medical marijuana theoretically do not have
to undergo urine-testing for cannabis.

Author Peter McWilliams, who suffered from AIDS and cancer, said

“If it
weren’t for the illegal pot dealers (before Proposition 215), there would have
been no marijuana and I wouldn’t be alive today. Marijuana eases nausea and
makes it possible for me to keep down food and the pills I must take to combat
my diseases. Fuck the federal government. Use it if you need it.” He was later
arrested by the DEA. His mother put up her house for bail. The DEA said if he
was caught using pot she would lose it. He stopped using pot, his health
quickly declined, and he passed away in June of 2000.

ED: In the 1960's I personally participated in hospitalized controlled environment long term marijuana studies for the LeDain Commission. My observation was that the group who smoked marijuana (grown down in the Mississippi area) created more interesting products and worked harder, made more money than the group who received the placebo pot. Both groups had many other similar problems however. But that is another story entirely for another time. I am just glad I was on the side that received.

No comments:

Post a Comment

QUOTES BY JEWS

QUOTES BY JEWS

In Russia there comes the hope of the world, not as that sometimes termed of the communistic, or Bolshevik, no; but freedom,freedom! That each man will live for his fellow man! The principle has been born. It will take years for it to be crystallized, but out of Russia comes again the hope of the world. ~ Edgar Cayce, 1944, No. 3976-29

**********These pro-Israel people like pledges: they tried to force me to sign a pledge of loyalty to Israel. When I refused, it was trench warfare, hand to hand combat every day I was in the Congress, and the U.S. people never knew that I was fighting to remain independent for them. To make real peace and to find real justice. Here, they have the whole of the U.S. government making pledges to them!!! Unbelievable. ~ Cynthia McKinney, PhD**********

“The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs or ceremonies we observe ~ whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely spasmodic sentimentalists ~ we follow the Talmud. It is our common law.” ~ Herman Wouk

**********

“Those who are incapable of attaining to supreme religious values include the black colored people and those who resemble them in their climates. Their nature is like the mute animals. Their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey.” ~ Maimonides

**********

“All of the anxious sighing, longing and hoping of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us heathen as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of Esther”. ~ Martin Luther

**********

WORDS AND WARNINGS OF WICKEDNESS

"If [Jews] are as wise as they claim to be, they will labour to make Jews American, instead of labouring to make America Jewish. The genius of the United States of America is Christian in the broadest sense, and its destiny is to remain Christian. This carries no sectarian meaning with it, but relates to a basic principle which differs from other principles in that it provides for liberty with morality, and pledges society to a code of relations based on fundamental Christian conceptions of human rights and duties." ~ Henry Ford

**********

“It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” ~ Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter 11

**********

The real God of the Universe does not have “Chosen” in the first place because he is perfect as we understand and predilection is a human weakness. The Jews invented the OT to fool humanity as always. The real God of the Universe does not send any body to kill, destroy his own creation, to rape, to maim, to create misery and havoc on other people. Don’t you get it? the God in the OT is a monster, is another one of the many Gods in the dessert, those sacrifices offered to God are Satanic as their name and the Jews keep offering sacrifices to their God. Last year they immolated thousands of human beings in Gaza to their God Baal, Moloch, Azazel, Satan, Lucifer. ~Isaas, TUT

**********

"I had been asked to sign a pledge for Israel when I first became a candidate for Congress and after refusing to do so my congressional career became trench warfare, hand to hand combat just to remain in the congress.

Ever since my refusal to sign that pledge for Israel the pro-Israel lobby let me know that my political net was in the hangman's noose it was the pro-Israel lobby they decided to tighten that noose." ~ Cynthia McKinney

**********

"Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France, but especially in Germany, a multitude of more or less clever, scheming, agile, speculating Jews ~ such as Jews are everywhere: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, reporters for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank and the other in the socialist movement, and with their arses sitted upon the German daily press ~ they have taken possession of all the newspapers ~ and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce. Now, this entire Jewish world, which glut a single profiteering sect, a nation of blooksuckers, a single gluttonous parasite closely and intimately interlinked not only across national borders, but across all differences of political opinion ~ this Jewish world today stands for the most part at the disposal of Marx and, at the same time, at the disposal of Rothschild.

**********

This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the largest banks? Ho-ho! The Communism of Marx seeks an enormous centralization of the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which profiteers from the labour of others, will always find a way to prevail. In reality, for the proletariat, this would be a barrack regime, under which the working men and the working women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work, and live at the beat of the drum." ~ Bakunin (1814-1876)

**********

“We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General (Eisenhower)...The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result remembering it." ~ General Patton in Germany, diary entry Sept 17, 1945**********

The U.S. Congress officially recognized the Noahide Laws in legislation that was passed by both houses. Congress and the President of the U. S., George Bush, indicated in Public Law 102-14, 102nd Congress, that the United States of America was founded upon the Seven Universal Laws of Noah, and that these Laws have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization. They also acknowledged that the Seven Laws of Noah are the foundation upon which civilization stands and that recent weakening of these principles threaten the fabric of civilized society, and that justified preoccupation in educating the Citizens of the U.S. of America and future generations is needed. For this purpose, this Public Law designated March 26, 1991 as Education Day.”**********

Marxism, to which all branches of Socialism necessarily adhere, was originated by Jew Karl Marx, himself of rabbinical descent and has been dominated by them from the beginning. Marx did not actually originate anything; he merely “streamlined” Talmudism for Gentile consumption.” ~ Elizabeth Dilling

**********Every time anyone says that Israel is our only friend in the Middle East, I can’t help but think that before Israel, we had no enemies in the Middle East.” ~ Fr. John Sheehan, S.J.

**********

The cruel canard ‘anti-Semitic’ does not apply for many reasons, not the least of which is the simple fact that the slanderous word itself is derived from language games for purposes of propaganda and in real world context has no validity. ~ Tom Valentine

**********

Follow the path of the unsafe, independent thinker.

Expose your ideas to the dangers of controversy.

Speak your mind and fear less the label of 'crackpot'

than the stigma of conformity.

And on issues that seem important to you,

Stand up and be counted at any cost.

~ Thomas J Watson (1874-1956)

**********

'There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. The business of the Journalist is to destroy truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals for rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.' ~ John Swinton, former Chief of Staff, The New York Times, 1953

**********

WHAT TALMUDICS THINK

Historically, Jews had always thrived in nations and empires with multicultural, pluralistic and tolerant environments, while they fared badly in strong ethnic or nationalistic societies. European Jews have always been the emblematic stranger or ‘other’. Therefore, by definition, a society where the stranger is welcome is good for the Jews, although they have not always appreciated this link. The future of European Jewry is dependent on our ability to shape a multicultural, pluralistic and diverse society. ~ Göran Rosenberg, Jewish author and journalist

**********

American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief ~ one firmly rooted in history ~ that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of U.S. Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues. ~ Charles Silberman, Jewish writer and journalist

**********

The Jew … Judaizes … he provokes religious indifference, but he also imposes on those whose faith he destroys, his own concept of the world, of morality, and of human life. The Jews detests the spirit of the nation in the midst of which they live. ~ Bernard Lazare

**********

We will legally define the Talmud as the basis of the Israeli legal system. ~ Benjamin Netanyahu

**********

"Anti-Communism is Antisemitism." ~ Jewish Voice, July ~ August 1941.

**********

We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own. ~ Maurice Samuels, You Gentiles. 1942.

**********

According to the Talmud...."...When the serpent came unto Eve, he infused filthy lust in her (but) when Israel stood on Sinai, that lust was eliminated" ~ Talmud, Abodah Zarah 22b

**********

As monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations ~ and it can only be genocidal and total because it is about our and their identities. ~ Yitzhak Attia, Israel Magazine, April 2003

**********

"Some may call it Communism, but I call it what it is: Judaism." ~ Rabbi Stephen Weiss.

**********

It was hard for Satan alone to mislead the whole world, so he appointed prominent rabbis in different localities. ~ A Chasidic saying attributed to Nahman of Bratzlav, early 19th century

**********

It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not ~ they will be killed." ~ Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg

**********

"The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts." ~ Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b**********

"The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor the the dog more than the non-Jew." ~ Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30**********

"Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therefore he will be served by animals in human form." ~ Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855**********

"The souls of non-Jews come from impure sprits and are called pigs." ~ Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b**********

"Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human." ~ Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b**********

"If you eat with a Gentile, it is the same as eating with a dog." ~ Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b**********

"If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell the Jew: "God will replace 'your loss', just as if one of his oxen or asses had died." ~ Jore dea 377, 1

**********

"Sexual intercourse between Gentiles is like intercourse between animals." ~ Talmud Sanhedrin 74b

**********

"It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile." ~ Sepher ikkarim III c 25**********

"It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah." ~ Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5**********

"Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God." ~ Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772

**********

Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity. The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists. ~ Noel Ignatiev, Harvard Magazine, Sep-Oct 2002

**********

We intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed, not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.

Even if reason tells us, even shouts with all its force the very absurdity of this confrontation between the small and insignificant people of Israel [i.e., all Jewry worldwide, not just “the State of Israel”] and the rest of humanity… as absurd, as incoherent and as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations ~ and it can only be genocidal and total because it is about our and their identities. ~ Yitzhak Attia, Israel Magazine, April 2003

**********

Any trial based on the assumption that Jews and goyim are equal is a total travesty of justice. ~ Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, June 6, 1989:

**********

REVENGE OF THE JEWISH RABBIS OF SPAIN In 1492 CE, Chemor, chief Rabbi of Spain, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice, when a Spanish law threatened expulsion (after the fall of Muslim rule in spain).

This was the reply:

” Beloved brethren in Moses, we have received your letter in which you tell us of the anxieties and misfortunes which you are enduring. We are pierced by as great pain to hear it as yourselves. The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the following:

1. As for what you say that the King of Spain obliges you to become Christians: do it, since you cannot do otherwise. 2. As for what you say about the command to despoil you of your property: make your sons merchants that they may despoil, little by little, the Christians of theirs. 3. As for what you say about making attempts on your lives: make your sons doctors and apothecaries, that they may take away Christians’ lives. 4. As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues: make your sons canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their churches. [Emphasis mine] 5. As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always mix in affairs of State, that by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them. 6. Do not swerve from this order that we give you, because you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power.

(Signed) PRINCE OF THE JEWS OF CONSTANTINOPLE.” ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---- The reply is found in the sixteenth century Spanish book, La Silva Curiosa, by Julio-Iniguez de Medrano (Paris, Orry, 1608), on pages 156 and 157, with the following explanation: “This letter following was found in the archives of Toledo by the Hermit of Salamanca, (while) searching the ancient records of the kingdoms of Spain; and, as it is expressive and remarkable, I wish to write it here.” ~ vide, photostat facing page 80. ~ The above was quoted from Waters Flowing Eastward by Paquita de Shishmareff, pp. 73-74

**********

“[1] When the Lord your God brings you into the land that you are about to enter and occupy, and he clears away many nations before you ~ the Hittites, the Girgashites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations mightier and more numerous than you ~ [2] and when the Lord your God gives them over to you and you defeat them, then you must utterly destroy them. Make no covenant with them and show them no mercy” (Deut 7:1-2).

**********

"Compassion towards the wicked is really wickedness. It is along these lines that Rabbi Levi opened his speech in honor of Purim: (Talmud, Megillah, 11a): "If you do not uproot the inhabitants of the Land, and allow them to remain - they will become thorns in your sides, and will cause trouble for you in the Land in which you dwell." (Bamidbar 33:55) The mitzvah, then of wiping out Amalek [Palestinians], actually stems from the value of compassion and kindness - compassion on all those whom Amalek threatens to exterminate. This mitzvah is an ongoing one, and valid even today. Today, too, there are those ~ driven by a deep-seeded anti-Semitism - who desperately wish to kill us. These are the people whom the Torah commanded us to obliterate, to leave no memory of them." ~ Rabbi Zalman Baruch Melamed

**********

Nachman Abramovic demonized Palestinian children stating: “They may look young to you, but these people are terrorists at heart. Don’t look at their deceptively innocent faces, try to think of the demons inside each of them. I am absolutely certain these people would grow to be evil terrorists if we allowed them to grow. Would you allow them to grow to kill your children or finish them off right now? Honest and moral people ought to differentiate between true humans and human animals. We do kill human animals and we do so unapologetically. Besides, who in the West is in a position to lecture us on killing human animals. After all, whose hands are clean?”

**********

"Wars are the Jews’ harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100 million of them, and the end is not yet." ~ Chief Rabbi in France, in 1859, Rabbi Reichorn

**********

"The Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism." ~ Rabbi Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and Humanity, p. 143-144

**********

If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there. ~ Moed Kattan 17a

**********

The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order, the “children of Israel” will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled in which it is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands. ~ Baruch Levy in a letter to Karl Marx.

**********

"My opinion of Christian Zionists? They're scum, but don't tell them that. We need all the useful idiots we can get right now." ~ Bibi Netanyahu

**********

It was hard for Satan alone to mislead the whole world, so he appointed prominent rabbis in different localities. ~ A Chasidic saying attributed to Nahman of Bratzlav, early 19th century

**********

Gentiles exist only to serve Jews as slaves. Goyim were only born to serve us. Without that they have no place in the world. Only to serve the people of Israel. Why are gentiles needed? They are only here to work. They will work, they will plow. They will reap. We will sit like effendi and eat. That is why gentiles were created,” Rabbi Yosef, Sha Party, Jerusalem Post, 2011

**********

"An example of the use of the Jewish code words Esau and Jacob is found in a sermon preached by Rabbi Leon Spitz during the Purim observances in 1946 (quoted here from the American Hebrew of March 1, 1946) : "Let Esau whine and wail and protest to the civilized world, and let Jacob raise his hand to fight the good fight. The anti-Semite . . . understands but one language, and he must be dealt with on his own level. The Purim Jews stood up for their lives. American Jews, too. must come to grips with our contemporary anti-Semites. We must fill our jails with anti-Semitic gangsters. We must fill our insane asylums with anti-Semitic lunatics. We must combat every alien. Jew-hater. We must Harass and prosecute our Jew-baiters to the extreme limits of the laws. We must humble and shame our anti-Semitic hoodlums to such an extent that none will wish or dare to become (their) 'fellow-travelers'.

**********

This is what Trotsky, a Jew, was preparing for the Russians for the implementation of Communism, which Marx based on the Babylonian Talmud for Gentiles:

"We should turn Her (Russia) into a desert populated with white Niggers. We will impose upon them such a tyranny that was never dreamt by the most hideous despots of the East. The peculiar trait of that tyranny is that it will be enacted from the left rather than the right and it will be red rather than white in color.

Its color will be red literally because we would spill such torrents of blood that they will pale all human losses of the capitalist wars and make the survivors shudder.

**********

Remember my children, that all the earth must belong to us Jews, and that the gentiles, being mere excrements of animals, must possess nothing. ~ Mayer Amschel Rothschild on his deathbed, 1812

**********

The largest overseas banks will cooperate with us most closely. If we win the Revolution and squash Russia, on the funeral pyres of its remains we will strengthen the power of Zionism and become a power the whole world would drop in the face of on its knees. We will show the world what real power means.

By way of terror and blood baths we will bring the Russian intelligentsia into a state of total stupor, to idiocy, to the animal state of being. So far our young men dressed in leather ~ the sons of watch repair men from Odessa and Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitza ~ oh, how beautifully, how brilliantly do they master hatred of everything Russian! With what a great delight do they physically destroy the Russian intelligentsia ~ officers, engineers, teachers, priests, generals, agronomists, academicians, writers!" ~ Secret Forces in History of Russia. U.K. Begunov 1995, p 148

**********

One of the finest things ever done by the mob was the Crucifixion of Christ. Intellectually it was a splendid gesture. But trust the mob to bungle the job. If I’d had charge of executing Christ, I’d have handled it differently. You see, what I’d have done was had him shipped to Rome and fed him to the lions. They could never have made a saviour out of mincemeat!”~ Rabbi Ben Hecht

**********

The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks.”~ Al Goldstein (publisher of Screw Magazine).

**********

"The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews ~ all of them in all different levels ~ is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle." ~ Rabbi Kook, the Elder, father of the messianic tendency of Jewish fundamentalism, said

**********

"You have not begun to appreciate the depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest Great War, but of every other major revolution in your history.

We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone." ~ Marclis Eli Ravage, Century Magazine February, 1926.

**********

"The United Nations is nothing but a trap-door to the Red World's immense concentration camp. We pretty much control the U.N." ~ Harold Wallace Rosenthal, Zionist, The Hidden Tyranny

**********

Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property (that’s you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency.

Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges.

They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.

After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call “Social Insurance.”

Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office (presidency) of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America.” ~ American traitor, the Jew Edward Mandell House giving a very detailed outline of the New World Order plans that were to be implemented gradually over time to enslave the American people ... A PLAN THAT HAS BEEN REPEATED IN CANADA, AUSTRALIA, BRITAIN AND ELSEWHERE.

*******

"You throw a little Jewish on top of that, you got trouble. You got a bunch of wild, crazy energy.

"Sorry that doesn't sound hippie. Sorry that doesn't sound like communal jubilant fun. Sorry I'm not a Pepper. Sorry I didn't pop out of a soda-pop ad, and life is just one big fucking cabaret, because a lot of what propelled Van Halen, what compels me and propels me is precisely this element. It's fury. If you approach me with anti-Semetic preconceptions, I'm not here to re-educate. I come from a whole different school of thought. If you don't get it on the first try, fuck you.

"Every step I took on that stage was smashing some Jew-hating, lousy punk ever deeper into the deck. Every step. I jumped higher 'cause I knew there was going to be more impact when I hit those boards. And if you were even vaguely anti-Semetic, you were under my wheels, motherfucker. That's where the lyrics came from, that's where the body language came from, that's where the humor came from, and where the fuck you came from. All equally as important. You want to know the ingredients? Don't ask if you don't want to know.

"What you get from repression and what you get from hatred is fury, and fury was one of the main trigger points for the great Van Halen. What you see now is a bunch of buffoons waddling around at the family barbecue, and their wives admonishing the children saying, "Don't worry, Daddy's just had a few too many Coors Lights and he's imitating what he used to do for a living when he played music, honey."

"What's missing is the testosterone. What's missing is the fury. What's missing is the passionate convicted commitment. And I got a lot of mine from my religious background. So y'all best stop imagining the way Dr. Zorba looked, or some defenseless Hasidic Jew with a little yarmulke on his head, 'cause that ain't here for you." ~ David Lee Roth

**********

Rabbi Isaac Wise, in The Israelite of America writes, “Masonry is a Jewish institution whose history, degrees, charges, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end

**********

“We infiltrated the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning. Why do you think the Pope, the Cardinals and all the Bishops wear yarlmulkahs? (skullcaps) The white race never figures this out. A thousand years later the white race began to wake up ... we had to come up with a plan B ... so we formed the Jesuits. There was a nice boy, Ignatius Loyola. He started the Jesuits.” (Loyola was Jewish. Research/read the Jesuit Extreme Oath) Regarding the Jesuits, quoting Rabbi Finkelstein

**********

Does worship of the Talmud pervade Judaism globally? Herman Wouk, Orthodox Jew and famed author of The Cain Mutiny, affirms, “The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs, ceremonies we observe ~ whether we are Orthodox, Reform,Conservative, or merely spasmodic sentimentalists ~ we follow the Talmud. It is our common law.”

**********From Jews Must Liveby Samuel Roth, pg. 22. “The organ is diseased. This disease is a sort of moral gonorrhea known as Judaism, which, alas, seems to be incurable. If you have any doubts, look at any Jew ridden country in Europe. If you need to be further convinced, take a look at what is happening in the United States.”

*******

“Every synagogue we Jews build in a Christian country is a finger of scorn we point at our hosts; a sore finger we stick into their eyes, like the leering of a senile old woman who does all sorts of foul mischief before you, and feels safe in the knowledge that you will not lay hands on her for fear of contamination.” ibid., pg.

*******

Sen. Al Franken: One of the widely disseminated stories was that no Jews died in the collapse of the Trade Towers because they had received calls telling them not to go to work that day.

To tell you the truth, I got the Jew call. I had an office in the Trade Center where I used to do most of my writing. The call came from former New York mayor Ed Koch. “Al,” he told me, “don’t go to work on the twenty-third day of Elul [September 11, 2001.].”

*******

Tell me, do the evil men of this world have a bad time? They hunt and catch whatever they feel like eating. They don’t suffer from indigestion and are not punished by Heaven. I want Israel to join that club. Maybe the world will then at last begin to fear us…Maybe they will start to tremble, to fear our madness instead of admiring our nobility. Let them tremble, let them call us a mad state. Let them understand that we are a wild country, dangerous to our surroundings, not normal, that we might go crazy, that we might go wild and burn all the oil fields in the Middle East, or that we might start World War Three just like that. ~ Ariel Sharon

THIS IS THE JWO/NWO

BLOOD PASSOVER

WELCOME WELCOME WELCOME

DISCLAIMER & FAIR USE NOTICE

This policy is valid from 21 August 2011

This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. For questions about this blog, please contactbarbaralee15@hotmailcom.

This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.