MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla.—Following
through on a promise, President Bush yesterday elevated U.S. military
ties with Pakistan, granting it benefits enjoyed by only a handful of
countries outside the NATO alliance…” (AP)

Religious ban upheld in Moscow.

Moscow—Reflecting increased pressure
on religious minorities in a country dominated by the Russian Orthodox
Church, a Moscow court upheld a ban on activities by the Jehovah’s Witnesses
in the capital…” [All these headlines taken from a June 17 local newspaper.
Articles like this are showing up all the time now.]

105 killed in bomb attacks; strikes appear
coordinated. Masked men target Iraq police. BAGHDAD, Iraq—Fighting
raged in five cities across Iraq yesterday as insurgents carried out
apparently coordinated attacks that killed more than 105 people and
wounded hundreds more.

Plums of smoke
boiled up form the streets of Fallujah, Ramadi, Baqouba, Mosul and Baghdad
as masked insurgents battled U.S. troops and Iraqi security forces in
what several officials said could be the opening salvo in a violent
push to derail the June 30 transfer of sovereignty…”(THE NEW YORK TIMES,
25 June 04)

Vital Background information:

The Origin of the Modern Violent Expansion of Islam

“In
1980 [only] two out of 64 [terrorist] groups [could be] categorized
as largely religious in motivation--in 1995 almost half of the identified
groups, 26 out of 56, were classified as religiously motivated--the
majority of these espoused Islam as their guiding force” (Bruce
Hoffman of the RAND Corporation).

Iranian
and Afghan jihad Terrorism, year 1979: Two watershed events occurred
on this year. 1. The Iranian Islamic revolution (where the Shah of
Iran was overthrown and a fundamentalist Islamic government was installed
in Iran). 2. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, which sparked the
anti-Soviet mujahedeen war. This war lasted for ten years, from 1979
to 1989. This Afghan war spawned the meteoric birth and expansion of
battle-hardened, well-trained Islamic Arab militants. At first these
militants were fighting to free their Islamic Afghan brothers from Soviet
domination, and appeared to all outside observers as harmless, merely
fighting to free their Muslim Afghan brothers from Soviet tyranny and
domination. (The Afghan people are not Arab, although they are Muslim,
Islamic.) Volunteers from all over the Arab Islamic world streamed
into Afghanistan, supported by conservative countries like Saudi Arabia.
In Yemen, the Riyadh-backed Islamic Front was established to provide
financial, logistical and training support for Yemeni volunteers. A
new group was making its presence known to the Soviets in Afghanistan--the
“Arab Afghans.” With the fall of the Soviet Union starting
to take place in 1989, coupled to the timely introduction of the Stinger
missile being given to mujahedeen fighters by the U.S., the Soviets
were driven out of Afghanistan by the mujahedeen, comprised now of a
major new element, these “Arab Afghans”, under the “inspired” leadership
of one Osama Bin Ladin.

Next
event: A very militant form of Islamic government--one quite similar
(but even more militant in its brutality) to the Islamic government
in Iran—took over in Afghanistan, the Taliban. Osama Bin Ladin and
his “Afghan Arabs” were instrumental in forcing this Taliban government
on the disunited and often bickering tribes of the mujahedeen in Afghanistan.
Now there existed a pool of well-trained, battle-hardened Islamic militants
under the command of Osama Bin Ladin--more importantly--living under
the full governmental and diplomatic protection of the new Taliban government
of Afghanistan. These so-called Arab Afghans have and are currently
using their experience all over the Muslim/Islamic world to support
local insurgencies in North Africa, Kashmir, Chechnya, China, Bosnia
and the Philippines.

Iran:
The radical Islamic government of Iran sponsored and continues to sponsor
the spread of radical Islam through terrorism, specifically through
the Iranian backed and Syrian supported Hezbollah. It was the Hezbollah
who pioneered the use of suicide bombers in the Middle East. The Hezbollah
were directly linked to the 1983 bombing and deaths of 241 U.S. Marines
in Beirut, Lebanon, as well as multiple kidnappings of U.S. and Western
civilians and government officials. The Hezbollah continues as one
of the central sources of training and equipping of secular, Shia and
Sunni movements against Israel. Up until very recently Iraq and Syria
were heavily involved in support of terrorist groups. Since 1989 religious
Islamic extremists have shown a willingness to strike targets outside
the countries they wish to subjugate.

Key
Radical Religious Groups

[descriptions
taken directly from the U.S. State Department publication “Patterns
of Global Terrorism, 2000”]

·Hezbollah: Radical Shia group formed
in 1982 in Lebanon. Strongly anti-Western and anti-Israeli. Closely
allied with, and often directed by, Iran but may have conducted operations
that were not approved by Tehran. Known or suspected to have been involved
in numerous anti-U.S. terrorist attacks, including the suicide truck
bombing of the U.S. Embassy and U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut in October
1983 and the U.S. Embassy annex in Beirut in September 1984. Elements
of the group were responsible for the kidnapping and detention of U.S.
and other Western hostages in Lebanon. The group attacked the Israeli
Embassy in Argentina in 1992 and is a suspect in the 1994 bombing of
the Israeli cultural center in Buenos Aires. Operates in the Bekaa
Valley [guess where Israeli intelligence suspects a lot of Saddam’s
weapons of mass destruction are hidden--the Bekaa Valley!], the southern
suburbs of Beirut, and southern Lebanon. Has established cells in Europe,
Africa, South America, North America, and Asia. Receives substantial
amounts of financial, training, weapons, explosives, political, diplomatic,
and organizational aid from Iran and Syria.

·Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ—Al-Jihad
Group, Islamic Jihad): Egyptian group active since the late 1970s.
The EIJ is apparently split into two factions: one led by Ayman al-Zawahiri—who
currently is in Afghanistan and is a key leader in the Usama bin Laden
(UBL) network--and Vanguards of Conquest (Talaa’ al-Fateh) led by Ahmad
Husayn Agiza. Abbud al-Zumar, leader of the original Jihad, is imprisoned
in Egypt and recently joined the group’s jailed spiritual leader, Shaykh
Umar Abd al-Rahman, in a call for a “peaceful front.” The group’s
traditional goal is the overthrow of the Eyptian Government and creation
of an Islamic state. Given its involvement with UBL, EIJ is likely
increasingly willing to target U.S. interests. The group has threatened
to strike the U.S. for its jailing of Shaykh al-Rahman and the arrests
of EIJ cadres in Albania, Azerbaijan, and the United Kingdom.

·Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ): The
PIJ, emerging from radical Gazan Palestinians in the 1970s, is apparently
a series of loosely affiliated factions rather than a cohesive group.
The PIJ focus is the destruction of Israel and the creation of a Palestinian
Islamic state. Due to Washington’s support of Israel, the PIJ has threatened
to strike American targets; the PIJ has not “specifically” conducted
attacks against U.S. interests; Arab regimes deemed as un-Islamic are
also threatened. The group has stated its willingness to hit American
targets in Jordan. PIJ cadres reportedly receive funding from Tehran
and logistical support from Syria.

·Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS): Emerging from the Muslim Brotherhood during the first Palestinian
intifadah (1987), HAMAS has become the primary anti-Israeli religious
opposition in the occupied territories. The group is mainly known for
its use of suicide bombers and is loosely organized, with centers in
Gaza and certain areas in the West Bank. HAMAS, while condemning American
policies favoring Israel, has not targeted the U.S. directly.

·Islamic Gama’at, Egyptian al-Gaa’at al-Islamiyya,
GI):

The
IG, begun in the 1970s, is the largest of the Egyptian militant groups. Its core goal is the overthrow of the Cairo regime and creation of
an Islamic state. [emphasis mine] The IG appears to be a more loosely
organized entity than the EIJ, and maintains a globally present external
wing. IG leadership signed Usama bin Ladin’s February 1998 anti-U.S.
fatwa but has denied supporting UBL. Shaykh Umar Abd al-Rahman is al-Gama’at’s
spiritual leader, and thus the U.S. has been threatened with attack.
From 1993 until the cease-fire, al-Gama’a launched attacks on tourists
in Egypt, most notably the attack in November 1997 at Luxor that killed
58 foreign tourists. Also claimed responsibility for the attempt in
June 1995 to assassinate Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak in Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia. Has a worldwide presence, including Sudan, the United Kingdom,
Afghanistan, Austria, and Yemen. The Egyptian Government believes Iran,
Bin Laden, and Afghan militant groups support the organization.

Key
Groups in the New Phase of Militant Islamic Terrorism

[descriptions
taken directly from the U.S. State Department publication “Patterns
of Global Terrorism, 2000”]

*Al-Qaeda
(The Base): Established by Usama Bin Ladin (UBL) circa 1990, Al
Qaeda aims to coordinate a transnational mujahideen network; stated
goal is to “reestablish the Muslim State” throughout the world via the
overthrow of corrupt regimes in the Islamic world and the removal of
foreign presence--primarily American and Israeli—from the Middle East.
[emphasis mine] UBL has issued three anti-U.S. fatwas encouraging Muslims
to take up arms against Washington’s “imperialism.” Al Qaeda provides
financial, manpower, transportation, and training support to extremists
worldwide. In February 1998 bin Ladin issued a statement under the
banner of “The World Islamic Front for Jihad Against the Jews and Crusaders,”
saying it was the duty of all Muslims to kill U.S. citizens, civilian
or military, and their allies. [emphasis mine] Allegedly orchestrated
the bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar Es Salaam,
Tanzania, on August 7, 1998. Claims to have been involved in the 1993
killing of U.S. servicemen in Somalia [“Blackhawk Down”] and the December
1992 bombings against U.S. troops in Aden, Yemen. Al Qaeda serves as
the core of a loose umbrella organization that includes members of many
Sunni Islamic extremist groups, including factions of the Egyptian Islamic
Jihad (EIJ), the Gama’at al-Islamiyya (IG), and the Harakat ul-Mujahidin
(HUM). The group is a prime suspect in the Sept. 11 attacks as well
as the U.S.S. Cole bombing.

*Armed
Islamic Group (GIA): Having initiated terrorist activities in 1992
following the Algiers refusal to accept a democratically elected Islamist
government, the GIA has conducted multiple mass killings of civilians
and assassinations of Algerian leaders. While present in areas such
as Yemen, the GIA reportedly does not target the U.S. directly. However,
it is possible that GIA splinter movements or personnel may become involved
in anti-U.S. action.

*
Aden-Abyan Islamic Army (AAIA): The Aden-Abyan Islamic Army is allegedly
affiliated to the Yemeni Islamic Jihad and has been implicated in acts
of violence with the stated goal to “hoist the banner of jihad, and
fight secularism in Yemen and the Arab countries.” Aden-Abyan Islamic
Army leader Zein al-Abideen al-Mehdar was executed for participating
in the December 1998 kidnapping of 16 Western tourists. Four of the
hostages were killed and another 13 freed when Yemeni security forces
attacked the place where the hostages were being held. In March 1999
the group warned the U.S. and British ambassadors in Yemen to leave
immediately.

*
Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HUM): Formerly part of the Harakat al-Ansar
(HUA), the Pakistani-based HUM operates primarily in Kashmir. Longtime
leader of the group, Fazlur Rehman Khalil, in mid-February stepped down;
the popular Kashmir commander and second-in-command, Farooq Kashmiri,
assumed the reigns. Khalil, who has been linked to Bin Ladin and signed
his fatwa in Bebruary 1998 calling for attacks on U.S. and Western interests,
assumed the position of HUM Secretary General. The HUM is linked to
the militant group al-Faran that kidnapped five Western tourists in
Kashmir in July 1995; one was killed in August 1995 and the other four
reportedly were killed in December of the same year. Supporters are
mostly Pakistanis and Kashmiris and also include Afghans and Arab veterans
of the Afghan war. The HUM trains its militants in Afghanistan and
Pakistan.

*
Jaish-e-Mohammed (Army of Mohammed): The Pakistani-based Jaiash-e-Mohammed
(JEM) has greatly expanded since Maulana Masood Azhar, a former ultra
fundamentalist Harakat ul-Ansar (HUA) leader, formed the group in February
2000. The group’s aim is to unite Kashmir with Pakistan. It is politically
aligned with the radical, pro-Taliban, political party, Jamiat-i Ulema-i
Islam (JUI-F). The JEM maintains training camps in Afghanistan [written
previous to the overthrow the Taliban and the installation of a free
democratic Muslim government in Afghanistan] Most of the JEM’s cadre
and material resources have been drawn from the militant groups Harakat
ul-Jihad al-Islami (HUJI) and the Harakat ul-Mujahedin (HUM). The JEM
has close ties to Afghan Arabs and the Taliban. Usama Bin Ladin is
suspected of giving funding to the JEM. Group by this name claimed
responsibility for the USS Cole attack.

*
Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LT) (Army of the Righteous): The LT is the armed
wing of the Pakistan-based religious organization, Markaz-ud-Dawa-wal-Irshad
(MDI)--a Sunni anti-U.S. missionary organization formed in 1989. One
of the three largest and best trained groups fighting in Kashmir against
India, it is not connected to a political party. The LT leader is MDI
chief, Professor Hafiz Mohammed Saeed. Almost all LT cadres are foreigners--mostly
Pakistanis from seminaries across the country and Afghan veterans of
the Afghan wars. The LT trains its militants in mobile training camps
across Pakistan-administered Kashmir and Afghanistan.

Fundamentalist
Islam:fundamentalist Islam calls for a return to an ontological
form of Islam that rejectsmodernity; groups such as Al
Qaeda and the Egyptian Islamic Jihad are representative of fundamentalist
Islam.” [emphasis mine]

Since 1989 religious Islamic extremists have shown a willingness
to strike outside the countries they wish to subjugate.

Now to put this into perspective with ongoing current
events, shifts in global nuclear powers, and finally, Bible prophecy

This
new phenomenon of Islamic terrorism has many Bible scholars scratching
their heads, while others are thinking it all fits into the general
end-time scenario. It is the “others” who are correct this time. Almost
any day you can log onto Foxnews.com and read about serious conflict
going on in the Middle East--U.S. Marines in a firefight in some Iraqi
city, some Iraqi pipeline blown up, some terrorist attack killing innocent
American or European civilians in Saudi Arabia (once considered a safe
place to live and work), Iran harboring and developing nuclear weapons,
Pakistan already possessing them (they’re an Islamic nation)--similar
situation in North Korea--rumours of Saddam’s hidden weapons of mass
destruction being hidden in the Bakaa Valley of Syria. And then you
have the never-ending blood-letting of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict--which
is very similar to the 600-year old conflict which has simmered in the
Balkans where two religions, Muslims and Catholics have slaughtered
each other for centuries on end, with brief intermissions along the
way. What do all these conflicts have in common?One
answer, they’re all over religion, they’re religious based conflicts.
It’s not about oil or money. In the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, it’s
a conflict between the people who believe in the Jewish-Christian God
of the Bible and the people who believe in Islam’s god, Allah. It’s
not just about terrorist’s. In most fundamentalist thinking Arab minds
these terrorists are regarded as freedom fighters for Allah, and they’re
fighting to install fundamental dictatorial Islamic governments across
the Arab-Muslim world, which would include the nations ringing North
Africa, the Middle East and Turkey (you’ve just read information taken
from the State Department report on global terrorism, so you know this
is true). The governments they want to see installed are like the fundamental
Islamic government that’s in Iran, and what was the Talliban government
in Afghanistan. To many Arab minds, the Al Qaida are freedom fighters.
But why are they attacking the U.S. then? Why 9/11, the bombing of
two U.S. Embassies in central Africa, the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole?
[Lest we forget, log onto: http://baal.guns-media.com/images/wtc/57.html]
Simply this, the United States is closely allied with the one freedom-loving
democracy in existence in the Middle East--Israel. Now the United States
is trying to install a western type freedom-loving democracy in the
nation of Iraq, as well as having done so in Afghanistan, two strongly
Muslim countries of the Middle East. To the average American this is
a war against terrorism, one where the terrorists of Al Qaida soundly
delivered their Pearl Harbor attack against America, and we’ve merely
responded in kind. But to the Islamic mind, this is far more, this
is about advancing Islam. It’s also, if we look closer,
a clash between two civilizations, the western Judeo-Christian democracies
where freedom and individuality of the citizen are cherished, and Islamic
civilization based on a religion that--in itsexpansionist
mode--uses violence to spread itself and its influence.
If you look carefully at what the major “export” of Iran is, it’s not
oil. Over the past 20 years Iran has been exporting an extremist Islamic
form of government, exported via violent acts of terrorism. Islamic
terrorism has been spreading through the Sudan, and many other North
African countries, exported by this more militant form of Islam coming
from both Saudi Arabia and Iran. But it has been coming out of Iran
for the past 20 years, slowly taking root as fundamentalist terror organizations
infiltrate these nations in North Africa and the Muslim world. The
Hezbollah is the major Iranian terrorist group, directly funded out
of Iran, who operates against the nation of Israel. This form of Islam,
supported by some very influential Saudi’s and spreading throughout
Saudi Arabia at many levels, is causing somewhat of a quandary for the
Saudi government, as this form of Islam seeks the overthrow of the Saudi
kingdom itself. The ultimate goal of making Afghanistan and Iraq into
free democracies is to put the activist Islamic government of Iran in
a sort of headlock--isolating, and hopefully cutting off the source
of this extremist form of Islam through terrorism. The United States
has already freed Afghanistan from its version of extremist Islamic
government, the Taliban, and installed a free Muslim based democracy
in that nation. So Iran is somewhat panic stricken, seeing this two-sided
democratic head-lock coming its way (while its citizens clamor for democracy
from within Iran). Naturally, realizing this, the call for “all true
Islamic freedom fighters” has gone out--with orders to report to Iraq
and fight to the death for Allah and Islam. The fanatical Islamic government
of Iran must be pretty desperate by now. It’s a “them or us” mentality
with no room for compromise as far as they are concerned. Coupled to
the Iranian fears, is the remnants of all those 20 thousand Afghan Arab
freedom fighters, trained in Al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan, who are
being called into the fight by an Al-Qaeda leadership which is licking
its wounds. Estimated number of Afghan Arab “freedom fighters” left,
18,000. What we are witnessing in the news today is Islam in its expansionist mode--with a very visionary President Bush trying desperately
to shove this “Islamic Genie” back into the bottle and cork it. What
happens if he (and we) doesn’t succeed? Answer: History repeats itself.
Read on.

History
as a window to the future, Europe vs. Islam: Has this scenario
ever occurred before in history? And what was the result, if it has?
The answer is, yes, it has. In the 1100’s AD, the Muslim world through
violence had conquered and installed fundamental Islamic governments
which spanned from North Africa on the Atlantic Ocean side all the way
to Egypt, throughout the entire Middle East, and all the way to what
is now Turkey, and had advanced through the Balkans (that’s why the
Balkans are part Catholic, part Muslim or Islamic). The Saracens in
Turkey were knocking on one of Europe’s back doors in the Balkans, and
on Europe’s other back door attacking southern Spain from Morocco. These
advances triggered a massive two-hundred year blood-letting called the
Crusades, which then led to the Inquisitions of the Catholic church
within Europe. Just north of the Balkans, Vlad the Impaler stopped
the Saracens cold, in their tracks. Catholicism was enforced throughout
Europe by the Inquisitions, at first in fear of the sweep of Muslim
civilization, and then these Inquisitions degenerated into going after
anyone who wasn’t a Catholic (Jews and Protestants, mainly). This was
above all else a massive clash of the western so-called Christian and
eastern Islamic civilizations. In both cases, fear of the other civilization
drove the atrocities and warfare, designed originally to stop Islam
at the borders of Europe. Now yet again fundamental Islam is threatening all the countries of North Africa, the Sudan, and Middle
East. It is knocking on one of Europe’s back doors, through
that massive train bombing of Al Qaida in Spain recently. And even
with tightened security, more is to come. Guerilla war is inherently
easier to wage than it is to counter. The United States, viewing this
as a terrorist threat, may hold these movements at bay or even reverse
hard-won gains made by the fundamental Islamic movement which is attempting
to install its form of governments across North Africa and the Middle
East, with it’s next target--Europe. And much focus is
on the forthcoming re-election of President Bush, which is critical
in the efforts of the free democracies of the world in forestalling
the installation of Islamic dictatorships around the Mediterranean world.
But at best, if re-elected, President Bush will only forestall
Islamic intentions by another four years. (If the extremists were smart,
which they aren’t, thank heaven--they’d bury their weapons in the sand
and wait four years, lulling their “enemy” to sleep.) But what they
are doing instead, is providing extremely strong pressure on the European
governments to do something they’ve been dragging their feet on, bringing
about complete and total European unity at the military-government level.
For over sixty years now Bible scholars have been looking in vain for
the re-emergence of some type of Holy Roman Empire style government
that will supposedly unite “ten nations” within the confines of the
old Roman Empire. Don’t think it could happen? Think again, nine such
revivals have already occurred in Europe over the past 1400 years, from
554AD to 1945. But most people never connect the dots, history is such
boring stuff, right? The Bible in Revelation chapters 13 & 17,
and in Daniel 2 & 7 predicted the rise of all these revivals, and
especially the rise of the one which has not yet occurred.
Europe--since the end of World War II--has been attempting to unite,
but sufficient incentive to fully unite has never been there. It would
seem the “incentive” has to be the threat of their very existence, while
the “protector” of the world’s free democracies looks politically inward.
Historically you can see how Europe handled the last Islamic threat
to its existence (1100-1300s AD). Europe has already achieved great
strides toward unity without the Islamic threat, a common currency,
a developing common military is also on the way (including a common
German-designed U-boat force being constructed in the shipyards of three
European nations http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/type_212/)--but
as always their efforts at achieving unity have stalled just short of
total unity. Why? Because achieving total unity amongst separate longstanding
sovereign democratic nations is a very hard thing to achieve, especially
when they do not share common language or heritage, which none of them
do (except for Germany and Austria). Subsequently, all the past revivals
of the “Holy Roman Empire” had to be achieved militarily, the two most
recent being that of Napoleon and Hitler-Mussilini. (Little known fact,
Mussilini was crowned Holy Roman Emperor in 1935 in a secret Vatican
Concordat.)

What
conclusion can we draw from the history of Islam’s 1st major
expansion in the 1100’s? Conclusion—Islam’s 1st expansion
made Europe & the Catholic church become extremely militant.

Second
Major Threat to European Security--shifting and re-arming global military
powers: This perceived threat is currently developing along
the entire eastern border of Europe. Let’s take a look to see what
is taking place in this arena.

1.
Growing Chinese threat: From an online source (BHP railroad website,
and other official Australian websites) I discovered that massive amounts
of iron ore are constantly being shipped to Communist China from the
Pilbara region of NW Australia. I did a little more online sleuthing
and discovered that the Communist Chinese manufactured 181 million metric
tons of high grade steel in the year 2002, just about double the output
for the United States for that same year. I also discovered that the
Communist Chinese currently manufacture 20 percent of the worlds commercial
ships in modern state-of-the-art computerized shipyards--yards which
are fully capable of switching over to the manufacture of naval vessels
for the People’s Liberation Army-Navy (PLAN). Now I served in the US
submarine service, so I’ve always kept a weather eye on submarine development.
Considering that the submarine has provided the most deadly and hard
to detect platform for launching nuclear ICBMs, watching international
submarine development is key to seeing shifts and buildups in nuclear
strike capabilities of belligerent nations and superpowers. So here’s
what I discovered. The Chinese in 1987 commissioned a nuclear powered
Fleet Ballistic Missile submarine (FBM), classified by NATO as a Xia
Class FMB. This boat is equivalent to a modern Russian Delta III class
FBM, which is pretty scary. China only has one of these subs, but has
been using it as a test bed for developing and testing better and better
submerged launched ICBMs. They have currently developed a three stage
submerged launched missile (SLBM) fully capable of delivering multiple
warheads per missile (MRVs) anywhere in the US (or Russia for that matter,
which is more to the point). It is of the more stable solid propellant
variety. Now the Chinese are working on manufacturing a new class of
Fleet Ballistic Missile submarines to carry these missiles. So China
has and continues to develop itself into a global nuclear superpower.
Next question, has Russia shown any kind of military reaction to
this growing Chinese threat on their Siberian border?

To
see how far China has gone in their bid to become a nuclear superpower--armed
with an expanding fleet of modern Fleet Ballistic Missile submarines
armed with successfuly tested two or three stage solid fuel submerged-launched
ICBM's--and a modern amphibious Army/Navy, click on http://www.gertzfile.com and read what Washington Times writer Bill Gertz has written about China.
China has become a far more belligerant nation than Vladimir's Russia.
And the Chinese are exhibiting an attitude of racial superiority not
seen in the world since Nazi Germany and Tojo's Japan in the late 1930's.

Content
Editor Peter Benson -- no copyright,
except where noted. Please feel free to use this material for instruction
and edification
Questions or problems with the web site contact the WebServant
- Hosted and Maintained by CMWH,
Located in the Holy Land