The final print edition of Britain’s “progressive”, “pro-democracy” newspaper “The Independent” has been published on March 26th, 2016.

It is worth remembering that with the launch of NATO’s genocidal wars on Libya and Syria in 2011, the long-discredited “anti-war” facade of “The Independent” had totally collapsed; despite the highly deceptive propaganda rhetoric of its gatekeeper “journalists” such as Robert Fisk.

The front pages of “The Independent” compiled below illustrate the more blatant strand of its 5-year-long virulent, appalling anti-Syria propaganda.

The UK government have published possibly the most hair-brained and contradictory mendacious pretext yet to try and invade Syria, by claiming it would be in ‘defense’ of errr…90km of Turkey’s southern border with Syria.

The UK have no military mandate to ‘protect’ Turkey’s southern border with Syria, let alone by illegally invading Syria, while pointedly not wanting to secure Europe’s external border with Turkey.

In practice all the military ‘manoeuvering’ and war propaganda in the US-led Genocidal war on Syria, has only ever been about trying to secure military ‘leverage’ in administrative elections in Syria.

The falsity of the US-led coalition was always obvious given the inclusion of the unelected likes of the Saudis & Qataris.

UPDATE:

The UK NATO war propaganda for the simple-minded that defies all logic and law has nevertheless had to admit that the Syrian army has advanced to protect it’s border from a NATO invasion by the US, UK & Turkey.

This is the very same allegedly all seeing big brother super-sized NATO that would have everyone believe it did not have a single helicopter in the air, to track an alleged errr…terrorist in a BMW in Brussels.

The best that the US & UK war criminals can hope for is Putin saving their bacon, because it is not at all ‘complicated’ that the US et al have no special rights in Syria over and above the universally recognised Syrian government.

The savage US & EU have long pushed the envelope too far slaughtering civilian populations all in the name of claiming some unknown administrative ‘authority’ in the Middle East to collect…rubbish, build…roads…

Resource wars have been used to try and keep civilian populations under the murderous thumb of big business for too long.

Syria took a scathing swipe at Britain on Sunday over the British position on Syria and the latest statements made by its Foreign Secretary, condemning Britain’s “political hypocrisy”.

In two letters it addressed to the UN Secretary General and Chairman of the Security Council, Foreign and Expatriates Ministry dismissed the escalation in the “brazen” attitude of some British officials on the situation in Syria, including those of the Foreign Office.

The British government, they said, has no right to peach to others about democracy, human rights and combating terrorism when it itself has employed all its capabilities and brought into play its “colonialist experience” in providing all forms of support, including financially, militarily, politically and media-wise, to the terrorist organizations in Syria.

The fact that the British government has sent terrorists and extremists to Syria, such as its national “John, the ISIS Slaughterer”, and harbored over tens of years others like Abu Qatada and Omar Abdel-Rahman reveals Britain’s “political hypocrisy and the falseness of its claims about promoting democracy, fighting terrorism and protecting human rights,” according to the letters.

NATO states could not conduct illegal wars without their bought and paid for corporate propagandists committing the criminal act of publishing war propaganda with the specific purpose of causing the murder of civilians for financial profit.

In fact what is not properly publicly declared is that many ‘journalists’ are actually employed by the British government through (zero) intelligence services, as a means to try and give the British government (il)legal cover by pretending they did not deliberately mislead the public themselves.

This is to notify the Independent that they reasonably know they are committing a criminal offence by inciting the murder of civilians through the use of war propaganda that supports a US, UK & Turkish invasion of Syria.

The British Parliament has been exposed trying to very quietly try and block legal challenges to their waging war on Syria.

The facts are the ‘Defence’ Secretary Michael Fallon dishonestly asserted off the Parliamentary record at the RUSI that he had legal grounds to use the false pretext of ‘surveillance’ to wage war in Syria without any vote, while the Tory & Labour MP’s David Davis and Tom Watson dishonestly portrayed their court order could stop legal challenges to ‘surveillance’ operations until the end of March 2016.

the entire apparatus of the british parliament and mainstream media are working together to try and avoid any legal challenge that can only expose the UK will never have any legal grounds to invade syria

Fallon, Davis and Watson were all acting on behalf of the entire British Parliament.

British ‘surveillance’ would realize they were rumbled with the three words…International Criminal Court.

Indeed why would any civilian wait for the British Parliament to go any further when no legal grounds of any kind have been produced for what is intended to be a British invasion of Syria?

So the war criminal Lord Ken MacDonald who Chairs ‘Reprieve’ (who really run interference over British government mercenaries like Begg, Belhaj & Co) then pretended today that Reprieve had filed an FOI request that ‘revealed’ the British government had already deployed the British military in Syria on bombing raids.

The British government peculiarly recently ‘announced’ in the ‘media’ not in the British Parliament, which was by no co-incidence shut down for ‘elections’ that day that British soldiers were going to try to ‘train’ what would really become a NATO ground invasion force for Syria launched from Turkey.

We asked the obvious question (in writing) to which there has inevitably yet been no legal written response from the British government, over what legal grounds there are to train what in legal terms are terrorists in Turkey, who the British government could not train in Britain… … …

… … …The plotting includes trying to put greater pressure on President Assad in Damascus (via Yarmouk, which should largely fail) while ridiculously trying to pretend a de-facto ‘government’ of white-washed terrorists can set up ‘state’ in Idlib to call for help from NATO… … …

… … … The simultaneous pronouncements that the US and Turkey are putting their overt terrorist ‘training’ scheme ‘on hold’ until May while Turkish ‘intelligence’ wants to blame any terror attacks on the Syrian government only proves that the European arm of NATO don’t have any legal grounds to be involved in the launch of any illegal ground invasion of Syria from Turkey.

It is obvious that Turkey blaming the Syrian government for any false flag terror attacks which is a very hard sell, is only designed to try and find a false pretext for the European arm of NATO to join a US & Turkish ground invasion of Syria… … …

NOTICE TO READERS

These infos are not intended to be shocking or to glorify violence in any way. These articles/images/videos are for educational purposes only, for documenting and try to explain the backdrop of a historical ruthless and bloody war, whose characteristics and details are routinely distorted and smothered by the dominant media.