Log in/Register

Please log in or register to continue. Registration is free and requires only your email address.

Log in

Register

Emailrequired

PasswordrequiredRemember me?

Please enter your email address and click on the reset-password button. You'll receive an email shortly with a link to create a new password. If you have trouble finding this email, please check your spam folder.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.

The Europe described seemingly has infinite capacity for Outward Migration - to The Anglosphere.
The Europe desired perhaps is The Anglosphere V.2.0 - with infinite capacity for Inward Migration.
And the twain cannot happen - unless Europe gets a "Trudeau", with London as its Capital.

Anders is a Swede who has written a lot on Soviet/Russian
economy while in Stockholm. Yet I venture to guess he didn't take into account the paradigm shift which is (already) in the making in global economic relations (international economics) with push to conclude FTA with mainland China - while US/WH/Pentagon are shifting their geopolitical game theory; namely, Russia (along with China) will continue to undermine US global strategic interest - thereby its economic hegemony.
Containment of mainland China has now become a state policy of this WH - led by Carter (Pentagon hawk). How to ring fence around Putin is more dicey - if Putin delivers some resolution of Syrian civil war.
Bottom line, Brussels is tying its global economic interests with China (with Merkel in the lead); US Congress is denying China of its place in IMF; TPP is fundamentally designed to enforce US strategic containment of China - specially in Asia.
So I don't think Brussels has lost its way, yet!

The very topic of this article, the "problems" and "solutions" discussed are exactly why Europe is falling apart.
It has no external problems only internal. It did not follow, execute the initial "dream" it was established upon.

It was supposed to become a true Union of nations, building true mutual solidarity creating a positive example for everybody to follow. It was supposed to show us way before we realized we evolved into a globally interdependent system how mutually complementing cooperation can give all of us a chance of a better future.

Instead the "dream" degenerated into a flat market and financial institution focused and dominated "quasi Union" which is now frenetically trying to pull all stops, sacrifice whatever it can to keep those all important markets and financial institutions solvent, functioning. These basic services that were supposed to be facilitating instrument for human trade have become all important in a typical tail wagging the dog fashion.

But life cannot be defined and measured by quantitative growth, GDP figures and the state of financial institutions. We are emotional creatures who need mutual guarantee, mutual responsibility and mutually complementing collaboration to survive as any other element of the natural system we evolved from and still exist in.

Our present paradigm built on artificial foundations, driven by excessive and unnatural demand, ruthless competition, success at the expense of others, sustained by empty bubbles is collapsing.
Let us hope we learned from our mistakes and we build a truly humane global human society on the ruins of this one.

The problem, I suppose, was not in stimulating 'too much' the EU Economies but in the weak Transmission ability that through inadequate taxation, lack of consumer and labor protection, high VAT, and inadequate subsidizing - takes from the all and give it to the rich practices; whereas the small businesses and investors were in great disadvantage !

Too much ideology without a shred of evidence. The Baltics are growing now at a rate of about 2%, the same rate as G7, euro area as a whole, and EU as a whole. They should be growing faster since they are relatively poor. The catch up phase after their huge GDP collapse in 2008-2010 is over. Comparisons with the U.S. should be in terms of per capita growth, not just GDP.

Masked in there is the same austerity message that got the EU into this mess. These are not the sanity droids you were looking for.

The EU cannot make strategic policy in the absence of statesmen. Policy, in the face of impossible consensus among such disparate states, is tactical and reactive, not proactive. This is why it is failing to respond well to events; it cannot get out ahead of them in any sense.

Quantitative easing and social support programs are all the EU has had going for it (see relative French stability, with strong protections that act to maintain aggregate demand). The author would do away with both, citing apples and oranges comparisons as justification.

If you are really in favor of a united Europe, best review the foundational postulates available in social contract theory, and control for the excess influence of the 0.1% who drive these mistaken measures. No way the EU will make it without a vision for all its people.

A brilliant analysis which conclusions follow ideological (religious?) assumption akin to voodoo or soothsaying.
The USA is for more than 100 years the leading power in terms of per head GDP. Freedom, liberalisation, structural reform, low welfare spending are part of the narrative, but not independent of other growth determinants. Not to forget, as often before in history, the US gained escape velocity through shale oil/gas, a technological breakthrough AND a natural condition that Europe and Japan do not have. The US does not have a refugee crisis due to its geography.
Stupid: It is much simpler to gain political support for demanding reform and compensate for losers, if resources are available. The main main reason, for instance, that market reforms do not succeed or succeed only slowly in Ukraine is the negative tradeoff between efforts and results. Europe is somewhere between and will overcome the current crisis. Cheap oil, cheap Euro and cheap money will work its way, as it did in the past. Referring to political will is cheap talk. So are easy answers to complex challenges.

There are trillions of cubic feet of shale gas in Europe that could be tracked, but the mineral rights belong to the government instead of the land owners, and tracking has been banned (likely for that reason, the land owners have no political desire to encourage production).

It makes being a young American sound pretty good. I have to say, American culture values enterprise, entrepreneurship, innovation, optimism, and hard work. I feel very very compassionate fro any European under 35- The elder generation has destroyed opportunity in Europe and kept basic elements of human dignity- a job, a marriage, young children, a place to live- out of reach for two many young Europeans. What kind of culture eats its own children?

A ship cannot have more than one captain. A ship cannot follow different sailing paths (can adjust its route but cannot go too much of course. Where is the Captain in the EU? where is this highly qualified, trained, unbiased and disciplined crew? Before talking about reforms, one should start talking about true leadership and developing a true democratic process in the EU, respecting people rights, identity and freedom to live in peace and prosperity.

The EU has problems, but they are solvable, since economic; the problems of the US are unsolvable, since cultural:
-unbelievable dumbness (about the world as a whole; about other States, etc)
-political deadlock (what, apart from initiate wars, has the Congress achieved in the past 30 years? the EU at least moves, 2 steps backwards and 3 steps forward)
-a Main Street environment that is poisonous for discourse, on account of its being in the hands of white male bullies who are anti-science, anti-rational, anti-Enlightenment
-out-of-control racism
-inability to compromise (since unable to acknowledge the Other's perspective)
-denial of reality (precarity of US water resources; earthquake risk)
-obese way of life.
The US has silk pockets, but they are only for the 10%; the coat itself is dishevelled and unkempt.

Economic freedom means the US can achieve far more with dumber people...it is also easier for Europe to have less racism because its countries are far more homogenous (for example, US has 0.491 ethnic fractionalization index, France is 0.272, Germany 0.095). Have a few Syrians move into a European town, and the racism comes out...

As for the article, to the limited extent that I can understand what Aslund is trying to say, it sounds like an economically conservative, austerity-cum-tax-cut program. I thought the US did the opposite and outperformed the EU.

That's a bit of an exxageration. Neither the US, nor certainly not the EU have a single "center of cultural tendency". The leadership is by nature dysfunctional and effectively careless in new and increasingly creative ways, that much is true. But is that really new. As democracies, we've been lucky enough to have a standard of living which affords us the option of apathy toward this. This is uncertain now.

Social investment, state capitalism, monetary and fiscal restructuring are the answer.

For examples:

1) Social investment: promise every married citizen a significant sum if they produce a child. Keep raising that sum until birth rates rise and average age declines. This improves demographics, demand and raises inflation.