Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Because when it comes to intelligent energy conservation, this obstructionist Council majority is appropriating funds in a foolish manner. They're asking for money for windows for which "the payback... would not be ideal."

Doesn't it make sense to spend money on projects with ideal payback? Say... a three year payback, instead of a 25 year payback? And if these economic circumstances don't cajole The Rubber Stampers into action, what will?

The MRJs Jesse Buchanan did a piece on the referenda. I wish he called me. I wouldn't have been quite as diplomatic as Tom Ruocco and Jimmy Sima.

And in all serious, when it comes to the confluence of energy and engineering... hasn't this gang of five proven they are entirely incompentent?

4 comments:

Anonymous
said...

I love how Florio says, all you're doing (if you don't pass the referendum) is "deferring the expenses".Isn't that what you do in a recession? Defer expenses on things that you can't afford in rough times.I wonder if these town council members and the superintendent handle their household budgets teh same way. Keep spending what you don't have. Isn't that why the country's economy is in such a mess tight now?