When New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie channeled his inner Tricky Dick and declared, "I am not a bully," he did himself no favors.

To be fair, Christie faced a dilemma: Either admit to creating a climate of bullying, intimidation and political payback that led to the George Washington Bridge scandal, or claim that his staff and appointees disrupted traffic on the world's busiest bridge as political punishment without his knowledge. In the business we call it a choice between being a crook or a schnook.

Ladies and gentlemen, meet Gov. Schnook.

A schnook, for those who don't speak Yiddish, is a dupe. A fool. A patsy. A schnook is a victim, and Chris Christie is not convincing playing the victim. He wants us to believe that Gov. Straight-Talk, Mister No-B.S., credulously believed a pack of lies from his close aides.

He wants us to believe that, as a former federal prosecutor, he thought his one-hour "investigation" of this operation, which yielded no confessions, was all that he could have done to unearth the truth. The governor clearly hopes that his press conference, his apology and his firing of one whole person will put this issue to rest.

It won't.

There's a great old saying that battle-scarred scandal managers love: "The dogs bark but the carnival moves on." It's the crisis manager's equivalent of "Take two aspirin and call me in the morning," meant to reassure the scandal-plagued public figure that the media and the public have short attention spans, and that the next twerking episode will distract folks.

But not with the Chris Christie bridge-closing scandal: This one's gonna stick.

How do I know? Three reasons:

1. It feeds a pre-existing narrative. This is the most important factor in determining whether a miscue becomes a scandal and whether a scandal becomes a permanent taint. Any issue that advances a narrative that people already have is given greater credence and is more memorable.

Every public figure has a master narrative. In fact they have two: one positive, one negative. In the case of Christie, his larger-than-life persona has been drawn both with bold strokes and in vivid color. The positive narrative is compelling -- and true: the straight-talking, forceful, blunt leader; the no-nonsense take-charge guy who blasted as "stupid and selfish" his own constituents who did not evacuate a beach community before a hurricane.

Christie's negative narrative is just as powerful, and just as true: bully. He burst on the national scene in YouTube clips of town hall meetings where he berated critics. As The New York Times reported, as governor, Christie has a remarkable pattern of bullying: stripping former Gov. Richard Codey of his security detail after Codey called Christie "combative and difficult;" cutting funding to a Rutgers University program run by a professor who sided with Democrats on a redistricting panel, and more.

If, as it appears, Christie's appointees and staff forced New Jerseyans to suffer through a four-hour traffic jam because their mayor -- a Democrat -- had the temerity to back the Democratic candidate opposing Christie's re-election, it doesn't just feed the image of a bully; it cements it.

2. There are ongoing legal and political processes. The Democratic majority leader of the State Senate, Loretta Weinberg, described herself as shocked by the scandal. More important -- and more ominous, for Christie -- she declared, "I am waiting -- and hopefully with the support of Assemblyman (and Deputy Speaker John) Wisniewski -- that the subpoena power will continue." Continuing subpoenas mean continuing revelations. "Sooner rather than later," Weinberg said, "we're going to hear the whole story of who knew what when."

There are almost certainly going to be lawsuits from aggrieved commuters, which will put folks under oath. And, most ominously, the U.S. attorney has said he is looking into the matter. If this becomes a federal case, the stakes rise immeasurably.

3. It happened at the media epicenter. It's not fair, but it's true: The news media is based largely on the East Coast and principally in New York. If the governor of South Dakota closed the Chief Standing Bear Bridge, which connects South Dakota to Nebraska, most of the national media would not know or care. But this is the George Washington Bridge. Journalists can cover this story, literally, on their commute. Christie's proximity to the media center has helped fuel his celebrity; now it may fuel his downfall.

The truth is there is not much Christie can do about these three dynamics. He tried apologizing, but kept returning to the plea that he is truly the victim here: that he's just a poor schnook who was lied to.

It seems to me that is small comfort to the thousands of people who endured four-hour traffic jams, or schoolchildren trapped on endless bus rides, or the family of the elderly woman who died after emergency services were slow in getting to her. He tried blaming others, as if acting in a Sopranoesque fashion is totally antithetical to his political style. Soon he will return to attacking the press and Democrats. None of it will work.

If you believe Bullygate is going away anytime soon, there's a bridge in Fort Lee I'd like to sell you.

I really doubt that Christie was looking to punish a Democratic mayor for not endorsing him.

It's far more likely that Christie was looking to punish the leader of the Senate Democrats in New Jersey, who's district is Fort Lee, for effectively forcing him to pull the wife of one of his staffers from the New Jersey Supreme Court, an incredibly embarrassing move that's only happened once before in state history.

Christie made the pull on August 12th, had a furious press conference the evening of the 12th, called Senate Democrats "animals" at that presser, and badda bing, badda boom -- the morning of the 13th, his right-hand woman emails orders to shut down the busiest bridge in the world, which happens to reside in the district of the Senate Democrats' leader.

I don't think Christie would have anything to do with something like this, and I'm sure no staffers would be dumb enough to ruin their superiors' deniability if they were going to try something like this. But I don't put it past staffers to pursue vendettas.

People act like it was probably Christie himself who said "Say, isn't that some town where a mayor didn't endorse me?" There are probably a million Democrat mayors in New Jersey most of which wouldn't have endorsed him. But a staffer who would have tried to secure an endorsement or worked with ground-level staff of an opposing party might have beefs they'd like to pursue.

I don't think Christie would have anything to do with something like this, and I'm sure no staffers would be dumb enough to ruin their superiors' deniability if they were going to try something like this. But I don't put it past staffers to pursue vendettas.

People act like it was probably Christie himself who said "Say, isn't that some town where a mayor didn't endorse me?" There are probably a million Democrat mayors in New Jersey most of which wouldn't have endorsed him. But a staffer who would have tried to secure an endorsement or worked with ground-level staff of an opposing party might have beefs they'd like to pursue.

He is an opportunistic prick and to use the Malcolm X line "his chickens have come back to roost"~

__________________“With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion"
Steven Weinberg~

In less than 48 hours, ABC, CBS and NBC deluged viewers with coverage of Chris Christie’s traffic jam scandal, devoting a staggering 88 minutes to the story. In comparison, these same news outlets over the last six months have allowed a scant two minutes for the latest on Barack Obama’s Internal Revenue Service scandal. The disparity in less than two days is 44-to-one. [See a chart below.]

From Wednesday through Friday morning, the latest on Christie’s Traffic-Gate led 11 out of 13 news programs. NBC produced the heaviest coverage, over 34 minutes. CBS followed close behind with more than 30 minutes. ABC came in third with just under 23 minutes.

I really doubt that Christie was looking to punish a Democratic mayor for not endorsing him.

It's far more likely that Christie was looking to punish the leader of the Senate Democrats in New Jersey, who's district is Fort Lee, for effectively forcing him to pull the wife of one of his staffers from the New Jersey Supreme Court, an incredibly embarrassing move that's only happened once before in state history.

Christie made the pull on August 12th, had a furious press conference the evening of the 12th, called Senate Democrats "animals" at that presser, and badda bing, badda boom -- the morning of the 13th, his right-hand woman emails orders to shut down the busiest bridge in the world, which happens to reside in the district of the Senate Democrats' leader.

Yeah, KChiefer already gave us the Rachel Maddow/MSNBC take yesterday.

__________________

"I'll see you guys in New York." ISIS Caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi to US military personnel upon his release from US custody at Camp Bucca in Iraq during Obama's first year in office.

I think you are missing the point. That story is bashing the some networks for covering the Christie story. However, it leaves out criticism of Fox, as if they didn't cover the story. Basically, Fox (I assume) is "guilty" of the same coverage as the networks cited.

It's a dumb story based on a even dumber premise that coverage of the breaking Christie story should be compared to an old IRS story.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Did planes hit the 2 WTC towers? Yes. Ah but were they the airliners we were told they were? Evidence and physics seems to say NO!

I think you are missing the point. That story is bashing the some networks for covering the Christie story. However, it leaves out criticism of Fox, as if they didn't cover the story. Basically, Fox (I assume) is "guilty" of the same coverage as the networks cited.

It's a dumb story based on a even dumber premise that coverage of the breaking Christie story should be compared to an old IRS story.

FYI Fox just covered it on the news.

Its only dumb if you are defensive and are all up and asshurt that the point is the MS media will go to any lengths on any story to cover Obamas ass and will get a nut over anything that deflects attention from Obama and onto someone else.

__________________
Frazod to KC Nitwit..."Hey, I saw a picture of some dumpy bitch with a horrible ****tarded giant back tattoo and couldn't help but think of you." Simple, Pure, Perfect. 7/31/2013

Dave Lane: "I have donated more money to people in my life as an atheist that most churches ever will."