The Value of a Jury System

The Founders of our nation understood that no idea was more central to our Bill of Rights -- indeed, to government of the people, by the people, and for the people -- than the citizen jury. It was cherished not only as a bulwark against tyranny but also as an essential means of educating Americans in the habits and duties of citizenship. By enacting the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the Constitution, the Framers sought to install the right to trial by jury as a cornerstone of a free society.

The Framers of the Constitution felt that juries -- because they were composed of ordinary citizens and because they owed no financial allegiance to the government -- were indispensable to thwarting the excesses of powerful and overzealous government officials. The jury trial was the only right explicitly included in each of the state constitutions devised between 1776 and 1789 . And the criminal jury was one of few rights explicitly mentioned in the original federal constitution proposed by the Philadelphia Convention. Anti-federalists complained that the proposed constitution did not go far enough in protecting juries, and federalists eventually responded by enacting three constitutional amendments guaranteeing grand, petit, and civil juries. The need for juries was especially acute in criminal cases: A grand jury could block any prosecution it deemed unfounded or malicious, and a petit jury could likewise interpose itself on behalf of a defendant charged unfairly. The famous Zenger case in the 1730s dramatized the libertarian advantages of juries . When New York's royal government sought to stifle its newspaper critics through criminal prosecution, New York grand juries refused to indict, and a petit jury famously refused to convict .

But the Founders' vision of the jury went far beyond merely protecting defendants. The jury's democratic role was intertwined with other ideas enshrined in the Bill of Rights, including free speech and citizen militias. The jury was an essential democratic institution because it was a means by which citizens could engage in self-government. Nowhere else -- not even in the voting booth -- must Americans come together in person to deliberate over fundamental matters of justice . Jurors face a solemn obligation to overlook personal differences and prejudices to fairly administer the law and do justice.

As the great historian of anti-federalist thought, Herbert Storing, put it, "The question was not fundamentally whether the lack of adequate provision for jury trial would weaken a traditional bulwark of individual rights (although that was also involved) but whether it would fatally weaken the role of the people in the administration of government . Perhaps most important was the jury's educational mission. Through the jury, citizens would learn self-government by doing it. In the words of Alexis de Tocqueville, "The jury is both the most effective way of establishing the people's rule and the most effective way of teaching them how to rule" . This learning, of course, would carry over to other political activity. As Tocqueville explained:

"Juries, especially civil juries, instill some of the habits of the judicial mind into every citizen, and just those habits are the very best way of preparing people to be free . They make all men feel that they have duties toward society and that they take a share in its government. By making men pay more attention to things other than their own affairs, they combat that individual selfishness which is like rust in society . [The jury] should be regarded as a free school which is always open and in which each juror learns his rights and is given practical lessons in the law. I think that the main reason for the political good sense of the Americans is their long experience with juries in civil cases" .

Once we see how juries serve as major avenues for popular education and political...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...The JurySystem
CLU 3M1
By: Khalil Meghji
The jurysystem has been used for thousands of years to fairly determine innocence or guilt in a trial. Although not utilized as much as in the past it is still used for most criminal and some civil cases. This leads to an unjust legal system full of bias. The jurysystem was first seen in use by the ancient Greeks thousands of years ago[1]. Though the system was the fairest way to produce a verdict, it cannot apply today because society has endured a change which taints the foundation of a fair trial by jury. Juries are much more open to tampering by interested parties through which can be undetected by the authorities. Jurors can hold bias and prejudice against a defendant based on a variety of factors. To offset this there are many alternatives to replace the dated system to produce more just verdicts.
The jurysystem was developed by the ancient Greeks thousands of years ago. They called this system the “dikastaí” this system involved the selection of up to 500 citizens for normal cases. For capital cases the number of citizens enlisted ranged from 1001-1501[2]. This basic idea of a jurysystem is still used...

...﻿Introduction
The jurysystem is a legal system for determining the facts at issue in a criminal law suit. In Jamaica the government and court system affects the jurysystem immensely. As said by former minister of justice and security, Mr. K. D. Knight, in a gleaner article published Wednesday February 21, 2011, there is no intention to abolish the jurysystem, with that said the jurysystem can only be reformed. In the issue of the gleaner published on 6 July, 2013 the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions said: ‘the Government must move quickly to fix the jurysystem as a shortage of persons to serve as jurors is a major contributor to the low case disposal rate in the nation’s courts.’ The DPP also recommended that the daily payment to persons serving as jurors be increased.
The jurysystem needs to be reformed because of the following reasons: The jurysystem can be bias, jurors are not showing up to perform their civic duty and the jurysystem is too cumbersome and slow which makes it expensive to maintain. There are several solutions to these problems; these solutions were developed by the ministry of justice in a meeting about improving the jurysystem. Some of the solutions...

...﻿The jurysystem has deep historical roots and has been described by Lord Devlin in title ‘Trial by Jury’ as ‘the lamp that shows the freedom lives’. Juries allow the citizens to take part in the administration of justice so that verdicts are seen to be those of society rather the judicial system.
Furthermore, in Justice, Democracy and the Jury, named Gobart James stated that freeing the jury from the law and precedent allows them to follow their conscience and good sense, and juries instinctively know right from wrong. In “Jury out on the Rule of Law” name David Corker stressed that juries were able on occasion to inhibit power and offer protection to the powerless, this is well established in R v Ponting and R v Kronlid.
Despite the facts of the advantages of the jurysystem, there are debatable issues such as: the jury selection, incompetency in deciding complex cases and immunity granted by the common law. Under s.5(1) of the Jury Act 1974 , states that a jury must be selected at random and only can be excused for a good cause or disqualified for various reason such as illiteracies.
In Ethnic Minorities in The Criminal Courts: Perception of Fairness and Equality of Treatment: Research by Hood, Shute and Seemungal stated that ‘jury member’s...

...believe that the jurysystem is a necessity to having a fair trial, I believe the exact opposite. I believe that the jury is made up of 12 people that have no clue what they are even doing there. Ben Shapiro, a writer from The Patriot Post once wrote,” The problem with juries is that they are generally composed of the 12 people stupid enough to get out of jury duty.” I say that if we want to keep the jurysystem around, we have to make improvement to it. We need to educate the American citizen about what they do at jury duty, instead of them just getting there and then having no idea what to do. We cannot just expect them to know, we have to tell them.
American jurist seem to think that when they are called to have jury duty that it is going to be like all of those law shows they see on television, but that is never the case. According to Jennifer Dearborn, the writer of the web article “The case of Casey Anthon; Defending the American JurySystem” from the Law Record, in the shows the person that has committed the crime is always found and put in jail, which is not always true in real life. This is known as the CSI affect. Another way that people can be wrong about the jurysystem trial process is that in a normal case, there wouldn’t be television cameras or microphones, the trial...

...﻿Evie Dunagan
Mr. Potoka
American Law & Justice
23 November 2014
Problems in the System
A Florida jury found Casey Anthony not guilty of first-degree murder in the death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie. As so often happens in high profile cases, the jury was wrong. Casey clearly murdered her daughter. Her mom, Cindy, reported that Caylee was missing on July 15, 2008. Casey’s cover story was unbelievably ridiculous. When Casey’s mom, Cindy, confronted Casey at Casey’s boyfriend’s apartment, Casey actually claimed that a random baby sitter nobody had ever met had taken Caylee away over a month beforehand.
Cindy called the cops, informing them, “I found my daughter’s car today. And it smells like there’s been a dead body in the car.” Sure enough, search dogs identified the trunk of Casey’s car as a dead body location, and scientists confirmed that a body had decomposed back there. A few months after a jury indicted Casey, police found Caylee’s corpse in the woods near Casey’s home, duct tape on her head. The defense did a Johnny Cochrane routine – they blamed everybody within a 10 mile radius of the murder for the murder. Defense attorney Jose Baez suggested that Casey’s dad, George, had sexually abused her during her childhood, without any evidence whatsoever. Baez also claimed that Caylee had drowned in the pool while George was at home, and that George had been involved in dumping the body.
There was no...

...Carr
Court Systems And Practices
American JurySystem
The Court System is the most important of the criminal justice system because it finds whether a person is guilty or not guilty. The United States Court system has provided order and justice for the United States of America. The court system was made to make sure all citizens are receiving a fair trial despite gender, race, color, national origin, or religion. Each of the fifty states has its own state constitution and governmental structure. The court system is made up of laws, statue, and codes. President George Washington signed a law on September 24, 1789 called The Judiciary Act. This law established the jurisdiction and constructed the federal court system of the federal court system and made the attorney general position.
The Court system is made up of many laws. The 1st and oldest federal law is the Constitutional law. This law is created in 1787 and is the oldest law. This law is held very high because it cannot be duplicated. The Statutory law is another made that is similar to the judicial law. Statutory laws are made by legal cases, which mean when a judge rules on a case; it becomes law on all future cases that are similar. The Administrative Law is another source of law that is known as the regulatory law. This law governs both state and...

...Importance of the JurySystem
The purpose of law is to define behavior and conduct that is acceptable in a society. “Obedience of the law is demanded; not asked as a favor,”(1) was said by Theodore Rosevelt in regards to how important the law is to a country. This is to ensure that people of a society are living in a place where they are free of fear, and able to reside in peace. Crime can be found throughout that world and is an unfortunate part of society, which must be dealt with in order to prevent the demise of law and order in a society. Martin Luther King Jr. said “Law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice and when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress.”(2) Individuals believed to have committed an offence against the law must be found guilty in a court of law to receive their punishment. The jurysystem provides a definitive conclusion to the innocence of those who have been accused of a crime. Having the jurysystem is effective and useful because Canada prides itself in its value of democracy which is shown through the involvement in justice, it allows for the peers of an accused to hear the entire facts of a case and the fate of the accused is not in the hands of solely one individual who may have conflicting opinions and values than that of the accused. In the...

...Jurysystem
And
Its relevance in India.
-------------------------------------------------
Abstract
-------------------------------------------------
This research article attempts to explain what exactly is jurysystem and the objective behind having jury trials. Also, we talk about its relevance in India and Indian judiciary. Tracing right from the period after independence when jurysystem prevailed in India, later when it was abolished and the present times where it is nowhere to be seen in our judiciary system, I have tried to gauge its suitability and feasibility in India and find whether the decision of abolition of jurysystem really a right decision or should we have jurysystem back incorporated in our judicial system like before.
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------...