Friday, 25 January 2013

Queen Mary SWSS Statement

The current SWP crisis has hit SWSS groups
across the country incredibly hard and thus QM SWSS have been unable to build a
revolutionary current on our campus. We are under fire from external groups on
the one hand, and internal pressures on the other. Other left groups and
activists on our campus have voiced their discontent with the way recent events
in the party have been handled and have isolated us from working with them in
the future. Broad left Student Union election slates, which we formerly stood on
with great success, have been closed to us. Our wider periphery no longer
wishes to work with us. Leading trade unionists and left academics in our
departments have ended the previously good working relationships we held with
them. The handling of recent events has meant QM SWSS cannot be an effective
interventionist party on campus. The party apparatus has offered us little
support: there has been complete indifference to arranging SWSS meetings and
stalls and individual comrades have been repeatedly asked to consider leaving
the party if they do not feel comfortable to hold the line on recent issues. QM
SWSS cannot hold the line on what we believe to be a poorly handled and
severely unacceptable turn of events.

We feel we are being asked
to defend the indefensible. We are concerned with what we heard at conference
regarding the Disputes Committee case. We are proud of having been part of a
party that fights hard for women's liberation and do not therefore feel the
party has acted in line with our politics. Particularly, the types of questions
that the women involved were asked were completely unacceptable for a vanguard
party, aiming to be at the helm of liberation, to ask and this has not been
accounted for. We are further horrified
by the way the women involved were treated in their branches and districts in
the pre-conference period. We feel as though being dissatisfied with the way in
which disputes handled the case has been treated as a grave crime, while
bullying, vilifying and verbally abusing the women involved has been treated an
acceptable political tactic. We ourselves have witnessed inexcusable behaviour
surrounding this case, taken our complaints to our leadership, and they have
failed to act.

As mentioned, we are
particularly concerned with emerging arguments around dissent, in which those
unable to hold the line are encouraged to leave the party. We do not stand in
such a tradition; that is to say, this is not the party of the leadership or
the apparatus, but of all of the members. Encouragement from the centre to
leave is not how the party has traditionally grown and developed, or it is
certainly not how we will grow as a party. To paraphrase Tony Cliff, every
member is gold dust. We are yet further concerned by the seeming ‘punishments’
the CC has issued to those who have been seen to have dissented, coming down
particularly hard on students. Well respected full timers have been moved, or
completely removed from party apparatus. We see no political reasons for doing
this and feel it is simply an act of retribution. For the party to grow,
particularly on our campuses, we urge the leadership not to treat capable full
timers as expendable just because of their relationship with the students or
position on recent issues, particularly as members of the apparatus who have
received formal complaints about their conduct in recent months have not been
held to account. Leading student comrades are being blocked from taking on key
roles within the national student movement, or on their individual campuses,
for seemingly little more than being involved in a faction fight at conference.
It is politically frustrating to be forced to remind the leadership that factions
are perfectly legitimate tools at conference, and to punish those that were
involved in them does not reflect healthy democratic centralism. We do not
discourage debate, crush dissent or encourage minority opinions to leave the
party. This is not the Bolshevik tradition.

The world is watching the
SWP and we feel the CC statement, party notes, and SWSS notes are misleading
and inadequate in dealing with this unfurling crisis. We need real leadership
now more than ever. We have to admit there were no clear victories at conference;
the disputes vote had a difference of only handful of delegates. There are
strong divisions within the party that cannot be brushed aside and ignored. We
strongly urge the leadership to listen to all members to respond appropriately
to this crisis, but a political culture has emerged that makes this very
difficult. We joined what we felt was the best vanguard party in the country.
QM SWSS is an eclectic mix of comrades from different struggles and movements
that joined the party over a number of years, but we all have political
concerns in common. We have all seen open, honest, political and outward
looking regular caucuses give way to sporadic private, individual meetings with
apparatus, where comrades are harangued or encouraged to leave and others in
group gossiped about and misrepresented. We have all seen sharp, political SWSS
meetings with lively debate and a broad periphery fade into complete
non-existence, with not only no organisational assistance from the apparatus or
leadership, but seeming total indifference. We have all seen a, while small,
organised, disciplined and committed SWSS being completely side-lined seemingly
for falling foul of the Central Committee during the conference period.

As a SWSS group,
predominantly led by women, we feel accusations of ‘soft feminism’, ‘creeping
feminism’ or simply ‘feminism’ have been often targeted at us. To reiterate, we believe that our
tradition on women’s liberation is excellent, it is simply not being
implemented. We are alarmed by Party Note’s discussion of ‘patriarchy theory’,
suggesting that we have made a break from analysing gender in a framework of
class. This is not the case, and has not been prevalent in any SWSS interactions
that we have had. Our understanding of women’s liberation has been consistently
sharp. We remind the party that the three leading female comrades at QM SWSS
made a sharp intervention in the counter pro-life protests that gained momentum
last year and alongside our university feminist society, have frequently been
used in media campaigns, including the party’s own recent pro-choice pamphlet.
We are alarmed at the use of ‘feminism’ as a political insult. We feel that
this is an outdated attitude – where ‘feminism’ was a way out of class struggle
in the 1980s, it has become a way in in recent years. The women’s movement has
exploded, and refusing to welcome those that identify as ‘feminist’ or hold
‘feminist ideas’ threatens to accelerate the party towards irrelevance within
this emerging movement. We also felt that SWSS notes were inadequate -
direction within the student movement is lacking. They show a clear break from
reality within the student movement and were completely insubstantial. Demands
to stand on left slates are unrealistic given hostility on campuses.

The call
for an ‘outward looking’ SWSS is abstract, as being simply ‘outward looking’,
if unable to interact with the outside, is idealistic and unclear. Rather than
offer clear instruction or ideas on how to weather this storm, SWSS notes
suggested the crisis within the party was minimal, citing a recent event at UEA
with a CC member as being “very good
and positive”, which it later emerged was not the case. If our student office,
along with our leadership is failing to even admit that a problem has emerged,
we do not know how we can proceed as a united party.

We share the desire to move
on as a unified party, but recent developments have meant the crisis cannot be
ignored and we cannot progress in this way. The mainstream and left wing media
are awash with criticism, as are many loyal and committed party members and the
CC must respond to this, giving members the opportunity to respond to this
somewhat unexpected dramatic public reaction. It is because of this, because of
the faith we have in our party members, because of the confidence we have in
our tradition, because of our desire to make the SWP the strongest vanguard
party that we can be, we urge the party leadership to reconsider their decision,
to respond effectively to this crisis and to accept calls for student conference, create a commission over the Disputes Committee (while
acknowledging that it would not be appropriate to reopen the cases discussed at
conference) and Comrade Delta should not represent the party at this difficult
time.