PER CURIAM: David L. Peeler appeals an order of the trial court dismissing Peeler’s challenge to the Town of Cowpens’ right to condemn his property. On appeal, Peeler states his “arguments are the same as the grounds stated in [his] motion for a new trial,” in which Peeler essentially argued lack of just compensation and lack of evidence of contamination and hazardous conditions on the subject property. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and Timmons v. South Carolina Tricent. Comm’n, 254 S.C. 378, 175 S.E.2d 805 (1970) (holding taking of private property for use as a park, for recreational purposes, or for public health is a valid public use). Therefore, the decision of the circuit court is