not king or queen
king and queen abdicated after world war one, causing the Wiemar Republic to be formed. from that civil brawls occurred between the Freikorps and the Bavarian Soviet Republic. After the democratic vote the fascist party aka the Nazi's gained power, and the Nazi regime has no royal line and their for no king or queen.

So in conclusion your board is right for being white but wrong for having a king and queen. (also you would of given them blond heads)

He was making the overused joke that Republicans (the American political party) are racist. Everyone in America who thinks that probably hasn't spent that much time around Republicans. They're not much different.

...the White's king is in check, when in check you have to make a move to get out of check. The white player wouldn't be able to move his queen on the first turn. The way I see it is that both players lose their queens.

Marxism points out the flaws in the society, mostly. He talks about the further spreading gap between poor and rich, so it should actually be something more of this kind :
(the big chesspieces represent the wealthy and powerfull, who are definitely outnumbered by the working, supressed man.)

He is saying that's how the world is, but not how it should be. These aren't from the viewpoint of these groups, these are what those people view to be a better world, so in Marxism, the better world would be one where everybody is equal.

Marx mostly pointed out the inequalities of capitalism and the spreading gap between poor and rich, but he and Engels also wrote about the Revolution, where the workers of the world would rise against the bourgeoisie and implement a socialist system where everyone's needs are taken care of by the government. The premise is that the money, factories, and raw materials would all be owned by the new worker government, and, with the aid of modern technology, would bring education, healthcare, food, and goods to the people