How Many U.S. Cities Can You Fit Inside Tokyo?

According to a 2014 report by the U.N., “Tokyo is the world’s largest city with an agglomeration of 38 million inhabitants.”

That can’t be right, you might say. No city has that many people. It says on Wikipedia that the population of Tokyo is only 13 million.

From a more technical perspective, there is only one City of Tokyo, and it’s population is 9 million.

In actuality, all of these statements are correct, each referring to a different meaning of “city.” Defining the boundaries of a city or even what a city is raises many thorny issues, and that’s especially true of Tokyo. Previously this post began by defining Tokyo, but after several debates over which definition was the correct one to use, I think it’s actually clearer to take Tokyo out of the picture.

Region X (forgetting for a moment that it’s Tokyo)

When you look at how the world’s population is spread across the globe, the distribution is very uneven. In the map shown here, just 5% of the world lives in the entire area shaded in blue. At the other extreme, another 5% of the world lives in the area shaded in red.

If you don’t see any red, you have to look close because it includes only 17 small dots. These dots are the locations with the highest population density on Earth, given their size. And the densest one of all is in Japan.

Looking closer at this region of Japan, let’s call it Region X, it has an area of 13,556 km², which is about the size of Los Angeles County. But its population is roughly 38 million, as much as the entire state of California.

The population of California in a region the size of L.A. County

Region X clearly has a lot of people for an area that small, but California is not the best comparison. It has some very big cities, but it also has large sections that are uninhabited.

The population of Region X in terms of U.S. cities

Another way of conceptualizing the population of Region X is by comparing it to U.S. cities.

There are other possible ways of defining Greater Tokyo, but under any of them, it is far and away the most populous human settlement (metro area / urban area) in the world.

And given its population, Greater Tokyo is also extremely small in size.

Combined, the New York and Los Angeles metro areas have about the same population as Greater Tokyo. Yet Greater Tokyo is about one-tenth the size.

Tokyo’s borders conceal some of its most exceptional qualities

With 13 million people, the population of Tokyo (Tokyo proper) is big, but unexceptional. For comparison, Shanghai has a population of 24 million.

Tokyo has a population density of 6,000 people per km², which is above average. But its density doesn’t compare to a city like Manila, which has 42,857 residents per km².

However, these definitions of city depend on arbitrarily drawn borders, which makes comparing them a fundamentally artificial exercise.

A more natural way of looking at population is to forget about borders, and view the world as collections of people living together. By this measure, Tokyo’s (Greater Tokyo) population is #1 in the world.

Similarly, Manila and Tokyo may both be cities, but with one being 20 times the size of the other, comparing the density of their populations is not exactly apples-to-apples. More meaningful would be to compare areas of the same size. And for it’s size, Greater Tokyo’s population density is also #1 in the world.

I'm an NYC-based entrepreneur (my newest project: Blueshift) and adjunct instructor at UPenn. I'm fascinated by data visualization and the ways that data is transforming our understanding of the world. I spend a lot of time with my face buried in Excel, and when I find something interesting I write about it here and also as a Guardian Cities and Huffington Post contributor.More about my background

That’s not Tokyo in the maps shown here though. The area shown in this article is Tokyo metropolitan as well as Kanagawa, Saitama and Chiba prefectures. Tokyo is actually only a fraction of what’s shown in the map here. Kanagawa, Saitama and Chiba are different jurisdictions with different laws ( in some cases ) and aren’t part of Tokyo at all. Still, it’s a lot of people for an area that size.

My source is the U.N., and it refers to this as Tokyo’s urban agglomeration, so I’m sticking with that. But if anyone can explain it, I would love to understand why there are so many Tokyos.

“Tokyo is the world’s largest city with an agglomeration of 38 million inhabitants”

Chris

About a quarter of the area you show here is actually deeply rural and in no way part of the population agglomerate. Particularly, most of Chiba prefecture (that huge peninsula to the east of the bay), an entirely separate entity from Tokyo, is rural and relatively undeveloped for most of its southern area. How do I know? I live there.

What you could do is make a note that this map actually shows three separate prefectures which each contain part of the agglomerate in addition to rural areas and forests.

But it sort of spoils your idea because the area containing that huge population is much smaller and would fit fewer US cities.

http://metrocosm.com/author/mgalka/ Max Galka

Thanks. Yes, the purpose from the beginning was to show the density of the “true” Tokyo (the actual urban area, not what’s inside the administrative boundaries), so reducing it to just the prefecture would defeat the purpose, even if it would make it easier to define.

Ha. I figured as much about Chiba. Guess that’s why Charlotte ends up looking twice as big as NYC.

Appreciate your thoughts. Will add a footnote to make sure it’s clear.

http://unimportanthero.squarespace.com Em

Tokyo, as defined internationally, is the Greater Tokyo Metropolitan Area or the National Capital Region. Which, yes, does include some parts of Chiba, Saitama, Yokohama, et al.

Chris

Interesting, I wasn’t aware there were that many different Tokyo related zones defined. Personally, I think that the “Tokyo Major Metropolitan Area” area comes the closest to containing the agglomerate. It’s a set of municipalities across numerous prefectures, rather than the entire four prefectures, and seems to coincide with the extent of urban development that would have the high population density.

Makes sense. It would be a big coincidence if the “true” agglomerate coincided exactly with prefecture borders.

Chris

Also I should mention you can actually *add* parts of Saitama, the prefecture to the north which is not included in your map, because a huge chunk of the agglomerate is actually in that prefecture. So, your map does not even reflect the entire agglomerate.

http://www.philgpearson.com Phil

Actually the map includes Saitama. Check out a map of Itto Sanken/一都三県, it’s clearly the same shape. Regarding the definition of this area as the urban agglomeration, I’m not in disagreement. The over-inclusion of Chiba is somewhat balanced out by the total exclusion of Ibaraki, the southern parts of which are eminently commutable to Tokyo, and which are often lumped in with Capital Region / 首都圏.

Chris

You’re right! It looked kind of squished to me, I guess it’s the angle.

Yoshio Ohtsuki

According to Japanese government sources, Tokyo has a population of a little more than 13 million.
Are you including everybody in the Kanto region when referring to “inhabitants”, or perhaps non-residents who work/study in Tokyo who live elsewhere fall into your definition of “agglomeration”?
Also, why are large portions of Chiba and Kanagawa as well as a section of Saitama included in the map?

http://metrocosm.com/author/mgalka/ Max Galka

The 38 million figure is from the U.N. report mentioned. It is the urban agglomeration, not just the Tokyo prefecture.

Yoshio Ohtsuki

I was trying to identify the definition of “agglomeration” in this situation, and it appears to include the entire population of the region inhabited by those who commute to Tokyo (not all of these people actually commute to Tokyo).

As of 2010 (I could probably find newer data if I looked, but I didn’t):
-Tokyo 13+million
-Kanagawa 9+million
-Saitama 7+million
-Chiba 6+million
With a total of 34+million people. Adding another 5 years to this, 38 million would seem to be feasible.

As for “Tokyo”:
-Tokyo city was a municipality within Tokyo-fu (Tokyo Prefecture) until they merged in 1943, resulting in the present day Tokyo-to (Tokyo Metropolis) with the area of what was Tokyo city becoming what is now the 23 special wards of Tokyo.
-Tokyo Metropolis is as explained above.
-Greater Tokyo Area includes the Kanto Area and Yamanashi Prefecture.
-Kanto is a region in eastern central Japan consisting of the Tokyo Metropolis and Gunma, Tochigi, Ibaraki, Saitama, Chiba, Kanagawa prefectures.
-Tokyo Metro Area, Tokyo Metropolitan Area, Metropolitan Tokyo generally refers to the 23 special wards in Tokyo, occupying the area which used to be Tokyo city.
(There are discrepancies in the use of terms based on the source/translator, but the above, for most intents and purposes, is about as accurate as you’ll get.)

http://metrocosm.com/author/mgalka/ Max Galka

Thanks! Thinking of doing a post on the geography of Tokyo. Helpful to have your thoughts.

For the purposes of the map, I also used 2010 data (downloadable here if you want to see). The total comes out to 35.4m, same as yours within a rounding error.

AS3Nagoya

The map that you show on your post is not Tokyo. It is Kanto. Kanto is the area of Japan where Tokyo is located. Kanto consists of 5 different prefectures. If you want to use this map and still use Tokyo, use the name “Greater Tokyo” or “Metropolitan Tokyo”.

http://metrocosm.com/author/mgalka/ Max Galka

Someone else just said the same thing, but there are only four prefectures included here. Going by Wiki, Kanto looks to be much larger.

I like the point of your article. Similar to when I try to explain to German colleagues how small Germany is compared to Australia. Many people living in Tokyo can’t correctly define Tokyo. Inside 23 wards, the prefecture, the “Greater Tokyo”, the protectorate islands hours away by plane? This article is a good overview. http://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/tokyo-population/

http://metrocosm.com/author/mgalka/ Max Galka

Great summary! Thanks.

http://karsten.patzwaldt.org Karsten

This area is by no means urban. Everything east of the border beteween New Orleans and San Jose on your map is at best rural, but in pratice it is mostly unpopulated mountains. I know this because I live in Tokyo and go hiking and cycling there. Same applies to the areas covered by Charlotte/Orlando/Miami/Philadelphia/Atlanta, which is all Chiba, and by no stretch of imagination a city. In fact, when going to Japan through Narita Airport, just look out of the window, it will be your last chance to see green trees for a while.

If all of this was to be counted as one urban area, then all of central Europe would be one giant urban area.

http://metrocosm.com/author/mgalka/ Max Galka

Thanks. Appreciate the feedback. It’s clear by the size of Charlotte in the map that Chiba is not urban. But I don’t see why that is a problem. Defining a “city” is a very thorny issue. In some cases cherry picking an exaggerated definition can cause a map to be misleading. But that is not the case here for two reasons.

Of all the possible definitions, the one used here is on the smaller end. And all of them include Chiba.

Regardless of how you define the region, the story remains the same. The map shows a region the size of L.A. County with a population of almost 40m. For its size, it’s the densest place in the world (not the case for the Tokyo prefecture alone). I could have instead drawn an arbitrary box and called it “box around Tokyo” and it would still have a lot of people living in a small area. If I were to remove the non-urban areas you mention, it would be even denser than it is now.

Tokyo

Don’t include the surrounding prefectures: Saitama, Kanagawa and Chiba into Tokyo…the number misleads people. Tokyo has only 12 million people.

http://metrocosm.com/author/mgalka/ Max Galka

That would defeat the purpose, which is to highlight the density / population of the entire region.

tylerc

It’s abundantly clear. If you were mislead, it’s because you chose not to read it.

http://unimportanthero.squarespace.com Em

Those prefectures are part of the National Capital Region, which is also officially named the Greater Tokyo Metropolitan Area. So, natch, it counts. When people talk about that 35+ million people figure, they are referring to the Greater Metro Area / National Capital Region, aka Tokyo Metro.

Albert2

None of your discussion of “most densely populated place on Earth” mentions Monaco. Whether as a nation, city (Monte-Carlo) or its 10 administrative districts, it is around three times as densely populated as Tokyo.

http://metrocosm.com/author/mgalka/ Max Galka

You’re right. I didn’t mean to imply Tokyo is *the* definitive densest place on Earth. It of course depends on how you define place.

Monaco is far denser than Tokyo as a whole. But since it’s so small, there are neighborhoods within Tokyo that are larger and more dense than Monaco.