September
10, 2004U-STEPUPQuestions: Why Isn't That Enough to Unite the Minor Political Parties?

"Do
not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have
perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted,
bastardized form of illegitimate government." --- James Madison.

James Madison,
"Father of The Constitution", and all of the signers of The Constitution
were adamant, or in agreement with the historical background interpretation.
Without a historical background interpretation, our Constitutional Founders
could not give The People their inalienable rights and protection from
their own government. They made sure their intent was known via various
quotes, manuscripts and Preambles..

Ever seen
the Preamble
to the Bill of Rights? The People are informed of the
Preamble to the Constitution whenever the Constitution is referenced.
Yet, the Preamble is rarely seen when referring to the Bill of Rights.
Immediately after: the official notice of time, place, and who, the very
next paragraph of The Preamble to The Bill of Rights is: THE Conventions
of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution,
expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its
powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added:
And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will
best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution. (The Preamble
started out as an amendment, but, apparently after discussion, it was
felt that this was too important to make just an amendment. The Constitution
had a Preamble. The Bill of Rights, which was required for ratification
of The Constitution, certainly should have one too.)

Yet, these
predominately learned lawyers of this klepto-nazi'cratic government, don't
have a clue on how to interpret "this Constitution". Where do the other
interpretations enter "this Constitution". There are no
ratified others.

Wow, I
must be brilliant! When it seems so clear to me while all these lawyers
are confused. Are my readers confused? Does it sound very complex? The
framers of the Constitution say, the Constitution must be interpreted
by historical background. Our present day klepto'crats know exactly what
interpretation is the only verified Constitutional Interpretation that
they must use and have sworn an oath to that effect, but, alas, oops,
that's the only one they don't like. Any of the others keep the state/fed
'crats fat, whilethe Historical Background Interpretation cuts
them back Tremendously in Power and Size. I wonder why the Preamble
is no longer part of the Bill of Rights when distributed by this government?
All these coincidences, who could figure? What were the odds? Who knew?
Seems they seem to know well enough what to keep out of The People's view,
apparently, the press has become confused also. Shouldn't the press insist
on the full legal document? What are the odds? . I wonder, since it is
disappearing from government documents, press releases, etc., has it disappeared
from the government's school books?

So, is
everyone up to speed? The People that wrote the Constitution said that
the text must be interpreted by Historical Background. This is the only
true Constitution, unless there is a Constitutional Amendment to change
"this" to "the", for the builders were extremely precise in each and every
word they finalized for ratification. What? What's the difference? This
sets a reference point in time. At that time, the Constitution was only
to be used with the Historical Background. It is that interpretation to
which they are forced by their oath of office to support.

How have
the 'crats become so powerful? From decades and years of CIA information
gained on trying to take over other governments. From decades and years
of hiding and classifying information from The People. From decades and
years of bogus various illegitimate "interpretations" that have absolutely
no place in "this Constitution". How is it, that these 3 branches of this
government can't quite seem to figure out which interpretation to use?
The average 4th grader, when presented with the question of Constitutional
Interpretation, must be slightly suspicious after learning Mr. Constitution,
James Madison, says, the text must be considered with Historical Background.
"Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will
have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a
distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government." --- James Madison

Since
the ratification, in 1787, of "this Constitution", every representative
of The People has had to take an oath to "support 'this Constitution'".
(Article
VI. Para 3..."The Senators and Representatives before mentioned,
and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and
judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States,
shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;"

This
route of "various interpretations" of the Constitution is The Root of
all government abuses against The People. These scam, gee,
we just can't figure out "which" interpretation to useis the source of power of this government's abuses against it's Own
People. There is only one interpretation. There can be no others. Any
other interpretations are Tyranny. The Historical Background interpretation
is the only acceptable interpretation. It gives The People back their
Rights and Power. It takes unauthorized power and stolen Rights from this
klepto-nazi'crat government. More clearly, for all those fighting for
your individual battles, against one of the 'burrow' agencies, remember,
that agency can draw on the resources of an entire government. Focus on
the root, the Tap Root, the theft of the Historical Background Interpretation
from the text, is the lever that destroyed this Republic. You can struggle
against the branches forever, for the root of tyranny will just grow another
using your body for nourishment. It is this root that must be destroyed,
for it is the route of nourishment to the 'crat illegitimate government's
abuses on The People.

In
the 'route' is the cure. Take "this" route to a True Democratic Republic
that has never before been seen on the face of this planet (even the Authors
of "this" Constitution knew what they had written was far from a True
Democratic Republic, for the Historical Background shows that they were
ready for a True Democratic Republic, but, this newly formed nation was
not. For "this" Constitution not only gave us the Rights granted by Nature/God/Common
Law then, it also gave the future the chance to make a Real one later.
) Take "the" route to the 'crat government that will
only get stronger and make more abuses on The People.

Is this
main philosophy not enough to bind The People and the minor parties? I
suspect there may be a few repub and demo constituents that are tired
of tyranny

All
Laws/Agency Rules/etc., et al., Must Be Interpreted Under The Historical
Background Interpretation of The Constitution? What good does that
do us now? In a little over 50 days, one of two klepto-nazi'crats will
win the Premier 'crat throne for four years. There is no viable third
party candidate. There are currently about 50
minor parties many millions that realize they are choosing
between a rat or a snake in a hen house, and don't vote, many millions
that realize a similar comparison, and try to decide which is the lesser
of The People's parasites, many millions more that would rather throw
their vote away on anyone but the 'crats (Unfortunately, many of those
no longer have the right to vote, apparently, keeping a felon from voting
is Safer for The People. When in reality, we know it's only Safer for
the 'crat government.), and many millions that do not even know they are
entitled to the Rights of "this" Constitution. There is no way that a
handful of people can do much within the next 50 days, maybe four years
from now, and only if there is an appeal to those that are uninformed
about their Rights and the Historical Background Constitution.

In theory,
it might be possible to make a statement to the 'crats by an E Pluribus
Unum Party within 50 days, and put the fear of God's Rights in them, but
hardly enough time to win. It would require absentee voting. It would
require the minor parties accept all concerns of each other minority party
that falls within the Rights granted Historical Background Constitution
as an accepted Right and either confer or delete any concerns that are
counter those Rights. It would require all the minor parties to take a
look at their political stances. Most have been around for several elections.
Some have gotten a little stronger. Some have gotten a lot weaker. But,
none are currently viable 3rd parties. Most of the minor parties believe
in their main theories, which seem to be beliefs on Rights predominately.
Most of those concerns are easily granted by the Historical Background
Interpretation of the Constitution. It's in the details that there are
problems. Let the details be damned. The People are in desperate need
of their Rights. How much more suffering and death will we have in another
4 years? The question is not, can the minor parties unite into viable
3rd party, but, will they?

There is
no United-States: The EPluribusUnum
Party. The Party is merely a Platform brought to U by the Founders
of this United States of America on behalf of those oppressed by their
own government. The Founders of America hoped, prayed, and planned for
a way The People should be given all the Rights given to them from Nature,
Evolution and God along with all the Rights' Law a Democratic Republic
might get the opportunity to Add. The Bill of Rights, especially in the
Preamble, was to prevent any decrease in The People's Rights by their
government. There is no mention of any government authority to infringe
on any of the Rights of The People. The only mention of government's authority
to infringe on these Rights is the notation in The Bill of Rights that
this government does not have that authority. The founders hoped
for a government that granted their children's children rights to Nature's,
Evolution's, God's and Common Law with that persons first breath. However,
this government is extremely different than the one the Founders fought
and died for. They do not place the blame on themselves, for they foresaw
that possibility. They place the blame squarely where it belongs, on The
People that have allowed it to happen. The founders gave The People Rights.
They gave The People a way to keep those Rights. They gave The People
a way to get those Rights back. It's The People's Right to take their
Rights back from this government.

Will
the minor
parties STEPUP for their and their children's children's
Rights?

Ed Ward,
MD, MT

"All authority
belongs to the people... In questions of power let no more be heard of
confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief with chains of the
Constitution." Thomas Jefferson

"If there
be a principle that ought not to be questioned within the United States,
it is that every man has a right to abolish an old government and establish
a new one. This principle is not only recorded in every public archive,
written in every American heart, and sealed with the blood of American
martyrs, but is the only lawful tenure by which the United States hold
their existence as a nation." James Madison (1751-1836)

"I have
sworn before the alter of god, eternal hostility against every form of
tyranny over the mind of man." Thomas Jefferson, Letter to B. Rush, Sept.
23, 1800

"America
will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln

"Those
who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." Abraham Lincoln

The judicial
system is very broken. It must be fixed. There are four people that can
do the job: Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody. Everybody thinks
Somebody will do it. It is a job Anybody can do. But, Nobody is doing
it. I'm trying, what are you doing? "The
Barb", B.C. Johnson

If there
are no Constitutional rights for one individual, there are no Constitutional
rights for "The PEOPLE". "The People" are now the
sequel to the "less equal". You can sit on the couch and moan,
or, you can try fighting! If you do not struggle, you will never change
tyranny! "t.R. e!war!", Ed Ward http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FIRE-US/,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GNATS

"A Parent
Is A Terrible Thing to Waste! If there are no Constitutional rights for
one individual, there are no Constitutional rights for "The PEOPLE".

"The People"
are now the sequel to the "less equal". You can sit on the couch and moan,
or, you can try fighting! If you do not struggle, you will never change
tyranny! --- T.
R. Ewar;

"Do not
separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted
and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized
form of illegitimate government." --- James Madison

"Government
is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome
servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to
irresponsible action." --- George
Washington (The original, not the bushy impostor.)

"..it does
not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority
keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root." --- Henry David Thoreau