Abstract:

The Pernkopf Anatomy Atlas was compiled in Austria during the Nazi era (1938 to
1945) by Eduard Pernkopf, professor of anatomy and director of the Anatomy Institute
at the University of Vienna. Initially, the Atlas was hailed as a classic “masterpiece of
unsurpassed beauty”, with reference to the anatomical illustrations, until it was discovered
in the 1980s and mid-1990s that Pernkopf and his talented illustrators (all ardent Nazis),
had used human material obtained from executed victims of Nazi terror to illustrate the
Atlas. In addition, it transpired that the illustrators had signed some of the illustrations
with offensive Nazi insignia (the swastika and the “SS bolts”). Amid international
condemnation and outrage, whether the Atlas should be rejected or continued to be
used has continued to be fiercely debated. This article revisits the Atlas with specific
reference to transgressions of medical law and ethics, the debate about the continued
use of the Atlas, as well as the startling revelation of the complicity of the medical and
legal professions in providing the Nazi regime with the legitimacy it needed for the
implementation of its political ideology. Ultimately, this article assesses the lessons to be
learned from this historical, but contaminated publication. It is argued that the principle
of moral complicity, the right to human dignity and, ultimately, civilisation all militate
against the continued use of the Atlas.