September 06, 2018

"This is worth reading every word. It explains why liberal democrats are beyond angry and reason... About a 3 minute read.

The fury of Democrats has nothing to do with missing pages or hurried timetables. It has everything to do with being sore losers. They still cannot accept that Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Doing so would demand coming to terms with why, under President Obama, the party lost not only the presidential election but also an unprecedented number of seats in the Senate, the House, in state legislatures and governors’ mansions across the country.

It would mean admitting that President Obama was a disaster for his party.

During that agonizing descent into impotence – as Democrats lost the House in 2010, the Senate in 2012 and the White House in 2016 – not once did the party veer from policies that clearly were unpopular with voters.

Not once did Democrats loosen their grip on the progressive juggernaut that propelled them forward. They embraced environmental laws that could cripple the country’s energy base, health-care mandates that were affordable only to those subsidized by the government, restrictions on law enforcement agencies that compromised our safety on our streets, regulations on small and big businesses that made them uncompetitive. They made it harder for entrepreneurs to succeed and create jobs, and they supported immigration programs that mocked the rule of law.

Because Democrats lost their majorities in Congress, President Obama took it upon himself to create laws and to implement them. In many instances, such as with Obama’s Clean Power Plan – which would have upended our country’s energy industries – the Supreme Court slammed on the brakes, so egregious was the executive overreach. Ditto the effort to fundamentally change our immigration and labor laws.

In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 against President Obama’s use of recess appointments in the case of National Labor Relations Board vs. Noel Canning. At the time, Bob Goodlatte, a Republican representative from Virginia, said that the "9-0 decision last week was the 13th time the Supreme Court has voted 9-0 that the president has exceeded his constitutional authority."

In the 2016 Supreme Court session, the White House lost 10 cases on unanimous decisions. That was a humiliating outcome that included votes from two Obama-appointed justices.

In fact, the Supreme Court ended up being the referee-in-chief, handing down an unprecedented number of unfavorable rulings to the Obama White House. Over time, most presidents score a “win” rate of about two-thirds; for Obama it was about half

This history brings the flap over Kavanaugh into perspective. If you are pushing an unpopular agenda, legislating from the White House is the last resort. But in that scenario, the makeup of the Supreme Court becomes vitally important.

The addition of Kavanaugh will almost certainly tilt the Supreme Court to the right, although over time judges can gravitate one way or another. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, for instance, who was appointed by President Reagan, was initially a reliable conservative voter on the court but over the years become ever more liberal.

For the moment, however, Kavanaugh is solidly conservative; he is, in particular, no fan of the endless spread and intrusion of Big Government. For instance, he declared unconstitutional the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency uniquely unaccountable to Congress or the president.

Kavanaugh’s dislike of an overreaching government is catnip to conservatives, but anathema to liberals, who increasingly embrace a soft form of socialism, encouraging ever more federal control of our industries and our lives.

The Supreme Court with Kavanaugh aboard would become a serious speedbump for progressives. The next Democratic president would be less able to legislate from the White House. Instead, Democrats would have to promote their programs the old-fashioned way; they would have to win some elections.

July 17, 2018

Did Trump make mistakes with his Finland trip? Not until today. Today he tried to "walk-back" his negative comments about US Intelligence. That's a BAD mistake.

Instead of trying to kiss MSM ass, Trump should have realized that he can't EVER play their game, because the objective of that game is PRIMARILY to make him look weak and indecisive, and he DID look indecisive today.

Trump has started the process of dealing with Russia by just meeting Vladimir Putin to get to know him personally. He made the meeting notwithstanding the efforts of his Intelligence chiefs, who don't WANT his personal diplomacy involved, they want to do their smoke-and-mirrors thing, which Russia, using their tried-and-true "Maskirovka" or deception-moves, well knows how to counter.

Vladimir himself is more than equal to the entire motley crew of US Intelligence alphabet-soup agency heads. Putin, after all, for years ran the most effective spy agency on the planet. Trump well knew that history, and knew that the only way to beat Putin at that game was to use his PERSONAL diplomacy to get inside that deception and expertise, and he just did. That drew jealous howls from the Intell Chiefs. Trump needs to counter those howls with orders: STFU or be fired. He hasn't, and instead kow-towed to the bleating of the Chiefs and the MSM, who took up those cudgels for the Intelligence community.

As THIS pundit sees it, Trump can still recover: his letters demanding the Intell Chiefs' resignations need to go out tomorrow morning. While his pen is warm, he can write one for USAG Sessions, whose mismanagement of FBI oversight led to this Intell Putsch to some degree.

Kick some ass, Mr. Trump, and the day can still be yours. Stand pat on this kow-tow you just did, and you've just put the 11/6 election in jeopardy.

June 28, 2018

Okay. The Right has a string of recent Victories we can call a "trend", and with the SCOTUS vacancy, we could extend Victory well out past the present political horizon. How do we do that?

We DON'T do that by "Never-Trumping". We DON'T do that by standing on soapboxes in the park arguing Roe v. Wade over again.

We DO DO that by going on the Offense. The most boneheaded Democrat out there (use your own iconic choice) will now have to admit that President Trump is in the catbird seat, and NOTHING that the (D)-party can do will change that. So, with the MOST POWERFUL politician in the Nation now DEFINITELY being Trump, how does he (and WE) proceed to go on Offense?

First, the Right needs an actual GAME PLAN; we don't have one now. "MAGA" is a slogan, not a game plan. The game plan will have a goal of winning elections and getting stronger in Congress and also local Legislatures/City Councils, of course, but it also needs a GRAND VISION.

The Grand Vision should be to take down the Democratic Party. Take it down FOREVER.

Yes, the entire Democratic Party needs to be consigned to the dustbin of History, and that's actually NOT hard to do, but it will take time. If Trump starts today, he will just get it done by the 2024 election.

So, how DO we take out the entire Democratic Party? That part is easy: the Democrats have turned their party into a networked system of political corruption (the GOP may have tried this, but only got as far as turning the GOPe into a Stupid Party). The major Democratic Party leaders direct all this corruption, and can LEGALLY be considered "Racketeers", so the entire Party structure can be considered a "Racketeer-Influenced Corrupt Organization". Public law is involved: 18 USC 1961 and related. When the Judge in the lawsuit rules that the (D)-Party IS a RICO group, he can ban it entirely, or perhaps, from the bench, take apart the party and ban the worst parts but put all the remainder on Court Probation. Either way, that ends the Democratic Party as a National political force. What would replace it?

Replacements for the Democrats would, of course, be a Socialist Party, but maybe also a Center-Party of some sort. The catchy-names will come later.

June 15, 2018

Facebook “hate speech”. A game of no-rules football, to be sure. The brass hats at FB admit there are NO concrete definitions of “hate speech”, they admit that they make mistakes, and they admit to employing 7,500 censors, but this is apparently their working definition of “hate speech”1 “we define the term to mean direct and serious attacks on any protected category of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability or disease”. In that word-string, I consider “direct and serious attacks” to be the operative definition. The rest of it is ei-ei-Yo to me. The PeeCee world changes it’s definitions of “protected categories” at least as often as a paid nanny changes a baby’s diapers, maybe even more often.

This article2 from the LA Times is informative, in a “told ya so” sort of way.

What FB needs to do is use a recognized glossary. Now, that glossary is going to vary based upon the nation the writer writes from, and that can be recognized by the use of algorithms.

Specifics: I used the word “muzzies (plural of “muzzie”). Here is a slang dictionary on that word:

“Muzzie n. a nickname for a Muslim. Editorial Note: This word is often, but not always, derogatory. It is not commonly used by North Americans. (Mar 11, 2005

In my banned post, I connected the use of the above slang word with “Terrorism”, which is a legal and military term. Perhaps a better choice for me might have been “Islamic” and “Terrorism”, but then remember POTUS44, who REFUSED to use that word combination. This is NOT a "direct and serious attack" on anyone.

More specifics: I used the name “Junior Trudeau” as I was referring to the MOST RECENT Canadian Premier, but there is a recently-retired one by the same name, the father of the present one, hence the descriptive “Junior”. There is just no way that can be considered offensive, but since my banned post was a comment on a thread by a former Canadian friend and some of his supposed-friends, politically Liberal, all of them, they took my comments on the thread very hard, especially since I had just pointed out that Premier Trudeau seemed to be lying about the Tariff situation between Canada and the USA, AND I showed a joint Canada-USA GOVERNMENT chart proving that Canada’s tariffs on US trade are FAR more excessive than USA tariffs on Canada’s goods. Again, NOT a "direct and serious attack" on Premier Justin Trudeau.

Further investigation: I declare that it’s appropriate, given this INAPPROPRIATE post-banning and “Facebook Jail” term, plus the THREAT of PERMANENT banning, that several things happen, and I am retaining counsel to see if I can bring these things about:

1. Facebook MUST have a glossary of banned speech and use it, ceasing ALL “hate speech” banning until it does. Failure to take this step is a violation of Free Speech as guaranteed by the First Amendment.

2. Facebook needs to stop playing political favorites, left over right. This same Canadian bunch, one of whom likely finked me out, is KNOWN for lampooning President Trump, and not always politely, either. If I can’t say “Junior Trudeau”, they shouldn’t be able to refer to Trump as an orange ape, or butcher his name (it’s NOT “Drumpf”) or cast unsupported negative personal aspersions about him.

3. Legal issues: Just like the political uses of the Clinton Foundation, there’s one of those tax-exempt funds over at Mark Zuckerberg’s empire. IRS rules for these is that they are CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONS, and cannot be used for political purposes. I’m going to bet that Zuck’s is used just like the Clinton's.

UPDATE: 061518 1941 PDT: Facebook lies their ass off. I was informed that I was in FB Jail for 24 hours. After that posted on my timeline, I waited out the 24 hours (blogging, posting on MeWe & Twitter, mostly about Facebook perfidy). Well, even though I have Facebook's word for that on my timeline, they broke THAT contract as well, now let me READ my page, but I can't post anything for another 24 hours. Oh, well, these meglos are all Democrats, so I guess lying goes with their politics. We will see what tomorrow brings. Oh, yeah, Face-planters, tell your legal department I'm coming, and I'm bringing a whirlwind.

Item one on #FrightfulFriday: Facebook Jail. Yep, I dared to piss off some real, by-God, Canadian Loons, and they snitched me off for writing a lampoonish comment about their Loon-in-chief, Justin Trudeau, whom I called "Junior Trudeau" (true, that: look it up, his father is still alive!). I referred negatively to Junior's "Letting the Muzzies in" immigration policy, in those words. I'm suspended, under THREAT of permanent banning, but those ASSWIPES at Facebook won't even tell me what behavior it is I have to change to stay on the FacePlace, other than I commited "hate speech", which is so vague a charge it could NEVER be used in any court to convict ANYONE. Just like a meglo, isn't that? "I'm God and YOU can't question me." You don't suppose that reference to WASPs (White Anglo Saxon Protestants) would be Hate Speech now, do you? I was called a WASP damn near every day in high school, and that School is considered one of the most PeeCee in the country, and has been for 100 years. Here's news FacePlace can use: I have contacted a civil rights attorney in Kali, and am inquiring about sending the Zuckerbooger a Cease and Desist letter, maybe even a Tort Claim.

Item Two: I waited, and now it's here, TAAAH-DAAAH! Savage's Model 110 Tactical rifle. I'm interested in Stock Number 57007, the .308 with 24" barrel. With this barrel length, heavier bullets can be loaded with slower-burning powders which are calculated to burn completely in the longer barrel, accelerating the bullet to a better velocity, almost as good as 300 WIN Magnum. The MSRP is $784 (Streets @ $606.99 at Grab-a-gun.com), very nice for a rifle of this capability, likely a half-MOA or better. Looks like I might be able to put together the rifle, the good glass and whatever else I need, maybe even a can for around $2500. Some 168-gr match and the tables look good at out past 500 yards. Yowza. One shot, one (nevermind).

So, I'm back on here, and on Twitter (@straightcase) and on MeWe (George Schneider) or the email attached to this blog.

December 19, 2017

Since perusing the newsworthy Facebook pages for the nonce, it occured to me that the Federal Bureau of Investigation may have been misnamed, and needs an immediate name change more in line with it's current (e)missions.

I propose that Agency be renamed F.E.T.I.S.H.

Federal Exterminators of Truthful Investigation Supporting Hillary.

Okay, it's kinda long for an agency name, but the acronym sticks the landing, eh?

Now, we also need to rename the class of citizens who support FETISH and their work.

I propose that these citizens forever more be referred to as:

D.I.A.P.E.R.(s) - Developmentally Interrupted Americans Pooping Everywhere Reachable. Of course, their lapel symbol is the DIAPER PIN (Personal Identification for Non-continents). Those pins are sometimes known as Safety Pins, but are completed with a jolly little pink or blue plastic head:

December 06, 2017

Looks like the Asses are about to throw Al Franken under the bus. He deserves it, but then those Donkeys are going to say, "We cleaned up our act, we're all good now."

I just watched a snippet of Hannity. Had to empty the dishwasher and it was on. Some Democrat "Pollster" was on (read: paid liar), and ke kept saying, with a shrug of his shoulders, "It's Politics", meaning that "there is a LOWER standard of morality in effect for the political elites, so quit holding them to YOUR high moral standard."

As I said before, the #MeToo women have thrown a few deserving predators under the bus, but they REFUSE to blame the leftist collective, which is ultimately responsible in that it tolerates, nay, DEMANDS that dishonorable behavior. Now comes this leftoid moon-faced pollster and essentially says the same thing.

My readers, can you NOW see the issue here? The issue is with the entire political class, across the span of the entire political spectrum. There is no HONOR in that class, no MORALITY. Everything the political class does is directly engineered toward keeping the class in power, and THAT is those folks' only clear direction of effort.

December 05, 2017

@POTUS has been winning on so many fronts. We on the Right are happy, but we should take warning, too.

The defeated Left is not going to go down quietly, or simply recalculate for another fight later. As I sense their desperation, they are about to play their final card, and this card will be them fomenting a street revolt of a far worse nature than any we've seen so far. Think of Antifa on Meth. Well, probably a lot of them are, but Soros has been hiring them on the cheap, about $1500/month to respond to his call.

What we look for now in this profile is evidence that he has seriously bumped those Wages of Sin. When we see that, you won't wait long to see the bullets fly.

November 29, 2017

We presently have a full-blown Constitutional Crisis in progress. What gets done about it will determine if the "malaise" our Nation suffers through with the polarized Parties gets bad enough to drive us to Civil War, or whether a remedy can be found to put us on the track back towards Constitutional governance. Spoiler: I think that Civil War is already here. Read on...

Within two days after Trump won the election last year, the Democrats had declared "The Resistance". The purpose of this "Resistance" was simple: throw every possible roadblock in the way of the then-coming Trump Administration. As a party, the Democrats have fairly efficient internal cohesion, and they had obviously planned this as a fall-back in case their "inevitable" Hillary failed to win.

Next, Trump himself made some major mistakes. Early on after his victory, he messed around with grabbing advisers from anywhere he could find them. It was obvious that Trump was unprepared to implement his victory, because most of the "advisers" he selected early on were rats, like General Flynn. His campaign staffers SHOULD have been at work for months pre-selecting these people, but they failed to get that started, and Trump failed to notice that failure.

After inauguration, the Democrat's path became obvious, and it has been obvious ever since: slow the formation of Trump's Cabinet down to a crawl, denying him any impetus of movement. Not only the Democratic Party is involved in that, but the Liberal Judiciary is as well, allowing the filing of a blizzard of lawsuits against just about everything Trump has tried in the way of reforms in many different governmental processes. This slow-roll is VERY effective, and it will get worse.

How worse can it get, my astute Readers must be asking? Look at the little stunt that was pulled yesterday: Trump asked for a meeting with Democrat leaders Pelosi and Schumer, and they both failed to show up for the meeting! BTW, this is NOT a new trick, the Democrats pulled this to stymie the incoming GOP Legislature in Texas a few years back. In that case, the entire Democratic register of that Assembly left the State to avoid having to turn the Legislature over to the GOP which had won a majority.

Okay, you have the picture. Now I will ask the question that all the above history was written down to bring forward: When does this "Resistance" become an actual Rebellion against the constituted AND Constitutional authority of Mr. Trump and his party, the Republicans?

My answer is that it ALREADY is a definable and actual rebellion. First, it is a carefully-planned operation with the specific goal of refusing to allow the duly-elected Administration of President Trump to effectively hold office and proceed with his duties of Chief Executive Officer of the USA. Second, there is plenty of evidence that parts of this rebellious operation have been financed from offshore, by elements of international Marxism, specifically George Soros, who has budgeted 18 Billion dollars of his huge fortune to bring Trump's governance to a halt. Finally, there is the violence aspect, with the Marxist street-gang calling itself "Antifa", another Soros-paid operation.

In my not-so-humble opinion, this Nation is already involved in Civil War: The Left, and their political arm, the Democrats, have seceded from the United States of America.

November 28, 2017

I have my "Clue-stick" in hand now, and I'm in my engagement pose, strong foot forward. I am TOTALLY ready to smite anyone who believes the Deep State crap that Trump had a ""rude" slip of the tongue, or that a "racial" remark was said as he talked to the Navaho War Veterans last night and referred to one of his LIKELY opponents in the 2020 race as "Pocahontas".

On the "racial" thing, it doesn't exist, except in the addled brain of Elizabeth Warren. She and Trump are the exact same race, Caucasian. Is she STILL trying to foist off the phony AmerInd heritage she fraudulently claimed several years ago to get a $350K/yr job teaching ONE insignificant class at Harvard University? POTUS just used his saber on her balloon.

People, how could you be DUMB enough to believe that Trump's entire remarks were NOT built around this master-stroke of a preemptive attack on an opponent? Not only was it a master-stroke, but it has WORKED like a dream. EVERYONE has now heard about the "Fauxcahontas" story, because the Press Secretary just briefed briefed them on Warren's fraudulent deceptions involved with it.

Even Deep State Fox News, which AGAIN followed the Globalist Never-Trump line and chided POTUS severely for the remark, even "Faux News" had to recall the Fauxcahontas deception!

This demonstrates Trump's power of communications, and demonstrates it PERFECTLY. This move has the Bannon stamp on it, and I hope that Mr. Bannon got properly and well-paid for his work. This, people, is how you turn the worst evil of the corrupt media back on their own networks.