If you are purposing JPEGs to the internet for people to view the images on their uncalibrated and unprofiled displays, the safest way of keeping the images having any semblance of how you intend they should look is to embed sRGB colour space and make sure that Black Point Compensation is selected.

If you are purposing JPEGs to the internet for people to view the images on their uncalibrated and unprofiled displays, the safest way of keeping the images having any semblance of how you intend they should look is to embed sRGB colour space and make sure that Black Point Compensation is selected.

Quite correct. If you want to prove this for yourself, go onto your own website at the local library and see what ghastly color you see.

I prepare my stuff in a properly colour-managed environment and generate my galleries in Lightroom where the colour management is handled under the hood, but pretty much in the way I indicated. Before I publish them I verify them on another display in the house which is not intentionally colour-managed - it's rather at manufacturer defaults - you know - too bright and saturated, to make sure they don't view as *egregiously* off-base - this stuff always being a bit of a crap shoot, because we can't know how millions of monitors are displaying images; most of the time they're OK to post based on that one test 0 - all I have time for frankly. So I don't know if you're talking about my site in particular, or what monitor in which library, but time permitting I'll check it out in *auspicious places* to see what you could mean. Could be "enlightening" :-( .

If you are purposing JPEGs to the internet for people to view the images on their uncalibrated and unprofiled displays, the safest way of keeping the images having any semblance of how you intend they should look is to embed sRGB colour space and make sure that Black Point Compensation is selected.

Mark, if you are converting between working RGB spaces, where black is L*0, black point compensation does not make any difference to the result when its checked. It is ok to leave it unchecked then.

Phil, embedding the profile is especially important for Mac users — and doubly so for those using wide gamut displays. Safari's interpretation of untagged (at least in OS 10.6) images renders them in the monitor's space (a boneheaded default for a web browser in my opinion). This means that even in a well calibrated environment untagged sRGB images can look awful on monitors unless the monitor space happens to be close to sRGB.

Mark: You are right - they look awful on Safari on a wide-gamut display. That is what made me notice the difference with my exports from LR and Save for Web from Photoshop; the Photoshop saves were bad! Now I am embedding the profile they are almost the same as LR's

You cannot be assured that whatever browser is used will do the right thing so sRGB is the lowest common denominator colorspace. I often use Save for Web when converting to jpg for web display however this process takes more time than exporting in Lightroom so if I have several images to process I typically just export from LR. Also be aware that most internet browsers are not color managed and will not respect the embedded color profile. Firefox and Safari are, and I know that IE is not, I'm not sure about all of the others. I am not sure how using flash changes things...