Comments

theswayzeexpress
7:05pm Fri 6 Jun 14

I've said it before and I'll say it again, if a club comes in with an 8 figure offer for Rhodes we should cash in. With gestede, Varney, Conway, Marshall and cairney we have quite a bit if firepower and I think we could prise someone like assombalonga from p'borough for half a mil, or a loan signing like nick Powell. However, not since mark Hughes have I had so much faith in a manager working a limited transfer budget. I look forward to whatever bowyer has got planned, even if it doesn't involve Rhodes. But if it does involve him, more the better.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, if a club comes in with an 8 figure offer for Rhodes we should cash in. With gestede, Varney, Conway, Marshall and cairney we have quite a bit if firepower and I think we could prise someone like assombalonga from p'borough for half a mil, or a loan signing like nick Powell. However, not since mark Hughes have I had so much faith in a manager working a limited transfer budget. I look forward to whatever bowyer has got planned, even if it doesn't involve Rhodes. But if it does involve him, more the better.theswayzeexpress

I've said it before and I'll say it again, if a club comes in with an 8 figure offer for Rhodes we should cash in. With gestede, Varney, Conway, Marshall and cairney we have quite a bit if firepower and I think we could prise someone like assombalonga from p'borough for half a mil, or a loan signing like nick Powell. However, not since mark Hughes have I had so much faith in a manager working a limited transfer budget. I look forward to whatever bowyer has got planned, even if it doesn't involve Rhodes. But if it does involve him, more the better.

Score: 7

roverstid
12:34pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Dukes wrote…

So that means, he staying put and Norwich were never in for him.

Which also means that Norwich fan sky reporter was blowing out of his back side - much like Sloppy Clitoris does.

Now onto the real story of Dyche and Ings - Or Dings as I like to call them. Will it be Southampton or West Brom you think?

[quote][p][bold]Dukes[/bold] wrote:
So that means, he staying put and Norwich were never in for him.[/p][/quote]Which also means that Norwich fan sky reporter was blowing out of his back side - much like Sloppy Clitoris does.
Now onto the real story of Dyche and Ings - Or Dings as I like to call them. Will it be Southampton or West Brom you think?roverstid

Dukes wrote…

So that means, he staying put and Norwich were never in for him.

Which also means that Norwich fan sky reporter was blowing out of his back side - much like Sloppy Clitoris does.

Now onto the real story of Dyche and Ings - Or Dings as I like to call them. Will it be Southampton or West Brom you think?

Score: 9

Ewoodlegend
11:16am Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodesEwoodlegend

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes

Score: 9

[deleted]
1:46pm Fri 6 Jun 14

[deleted]

Sadly though Mungo, it's not up for discussion, it's already been agreed.
There are other clubs who are still working towards putting their house in order, i.e. Brighton, and there are some who will fail to do so in the time remaining, i.e., Nottingham Forest.
There are however, far more clubs who have adjusted over the last two seasons at the cost of losing players, cutting the wage bill, and ultimately in their final league position, which in turn impacts prize money, commercial revenue, sponsorship, media income, etc.
The fact that it doesn't suit you means nothing. The clubs that have suffered over the last two years to become complaint are firmly behind it, they are also now self-sufficient and have a much healthier financial outlook, and that my friend is why your desperate whining and crying will come to nothing.
£25million in cost savings required, in the Championship, when already £60million in debt and losing £36.5million a year.... I wouldn't like to be in your shoes, that's for sure.Super_Clarets

Sadly though Mungo, it's not up for discussion, it's already been agreed.

There are other clubs who are still working towards putting their house in order, i.e. Brighton, and there are some who will fail to do so in the time remaining, i.e., Nottingham Forest.

There are however, far more clubs who have adjusted over the last two seasons at the cost of losing players, cutting the wage bill, and ultimately in their final league position, which in turn impacts prize money, commercial revenue, sponsorship, media income, etc.

The fact that it doesn't suit you means nothing. The clubs that have suffered over the last two years to become complaint are firmly behind it, they are also now self-sufficient and have a much healthier financial outlook, and that my friend is why your desperate whining and crying will come to nothing.

£25million in cost savings required, in the Championship, when already £60million in debt and losing £36.5million a year.... I wouldn't like to be in your shoes, that's for sure.

Score: 1

baldie
8:33pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

"They bank £120m and maybe spend £20 m,it's just an example.
If they come down,and I'm not saying they will,their gates will fall to 10/11 k average. How do they spend the remainder whilst still complying with FFP?"

That's money the club have generated. FFP is only interested in horrific loss making clubs, like yours. Sensible well run clubs will be financially secure for life because they only spend what they earn.

It was a serious question.
If you go down,you will only be generating the same income as you did this season,ie lower gates and advertising.
The £100 m will have been given to you by Sky or whoever,but you will surely have to comply with FFP or it won't work.

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
"They bank £120m and maybe spend £20 m,it's just an example.
If they come down,and I'm not saying they will,their gates will fall to 10/11 k average. How do they spend the remainder whilst still complying with FFP?"
That's money the club have generated. FFP is only interested in horrific loss making clubs, like yours. Sensible well run clubs will be financially secure for life because they only spend what they earn.[/p][/quote]It was a serious question.
If you go down,you will only be generating the same income as you did this season,ie lower gates and advertising.
The £100 m will have been given to you by Sky or whoever,but you will surely have to comply with FFP or it won't work.baldie

Super_Clarets wrote…

"They bank £120m and maybe spend £20 m,it's just an example.
If they come down,and I'm not saying they will,their gates will fall to 10/11 k average. How do they spend the remainder whilst still complying with FFP?"

That's money the club have generated. FFP is only interested in horrific loss making clubs, like yours. Sensible well run clubs will be financially secure for life because they only spend what they earn.

It was a serious question.
If you go down,you will only be generating the same income as you did this season,ie lower gates and advertising.
The £100 m will have been given to you by Sky or whoever,but you will surely have to comply with FFP or it won't work.

Score: 0

Super_Clarets
10:54am Fri 6 Jun 14

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.Super_Clarets

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

Score: -34

Dukes
10:48am Fri 6 Jun 14

So that means, he staying put and Norwich were never in for him.

So that means, he staying put and Norwich were never in for him.Dukes

So that means, he staying put and Norwich were never in for him.

Score: 16

inflightmagazine
10:58am Fri 6 Jun 14

more chance of Newcastle signing an English u21 striker than this happening

more chance of Newcastle signing an English u21 striker than this happeninginflightmagazine

more chance of Newcastle signing an English u21 striker than this happening

Score: 8

Steven Seagull
10:10pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Old age pensioner wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.

The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.

Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.

NH

Obsessed p1ss drenched octogenarian.

[quote][p][bold]Old age pensioner[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.
The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.
Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.[/p][/quote]NH[/p][/quote]Obsessed p1ss drenched octogenarian.Steven Seagull

Old age pensioner wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.

The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.

Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.

NH

Obsessed p1ss drenched octogenarian.

Score: -1

mammamiauk
1:59pm Fri 6 Jun 14

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley wrote…

I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.

Rhodes is good at scoring goals but lacks pace as a player. In my opinion, Gestede is a much better player and Rhodes is not even worth £15 million - the latter still has 3 years left on his contract and any club who comes in for him will have to pay it off.

[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.[/p][/quote]Rhodes is good at scoring goals but lacks pace as a player. In my opinion, Gestede is a much better player and Rhodes is not even worth £15 million - the latter still has 3 years left on his contract and any club who comes in for him will have to pay it off.mammamiauk

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley wrote…

I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.

Rhodes is good at scoring goals but lacks pace as a player. In my opinion, Gestede is a much better player and Rhodes is not even worth £15 million - the latter still has 3 years left on his contract and any club who comes in for him will have to pay it off.

Score: 1

jim 2012
12:28pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

will danny ings still be at burnley or can we Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.
will sean dyche still be the burnley manager or do you Expect his departure
to a bigger club given all the speculation do you expect them to move to bigger clubs that burnley ?

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]will danny ings still be at burnley or can we Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.
will sean dyche still be the burnley manager or do you Expect his departure
to a bigger club given all the speculation do you expect them to move to bigger clubs that burnley ?jim 2012

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

will danny ings still be at burnley or can we Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.
will sean dyche still be the burnley manager or do you Expect his departure
to a bigger club given all the speculation do you expect them to move to bigger clubs that burnley ?

Score: 14

[deleted]
2:14pm Fri 6 Jun 14

[deleted]

[quote][p][bold]Rovers 1495[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
"Everything is geared up for promotion make no mistake.We intend to hit the ground running"
LOL!
I guess you're another in denial as regards FFP. You think that if you keep believing it will blow over it just might. LOL!
Hold onto your dungaree's Mungo, it's about to get a bit turbulent for you lot.[/p][/quote]To be sung after Bumleys first game in the PL (to the tune of MOTD)
Ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha[/p][/quote]When the first Salvo of FFP is fired let's see how hard you'll be laughing then.
You'll be sat in your nicotine stained walled Shadsworth bedsit for one that reeks of chip pan fat and fag smoke in your p1ss soaked yellow and brown (were once white) y fronts and your soup stained 1995 Rovers shirt with the Shearer letters on the back crumbling off, with your head in your hands as the gravity of the situation your "once proud " club finds itself in finally begins to manifest in your very small mind.
Oh how you yern for those days when an old man gave you his bank book and Manchester United were briefly your local rivals.
If I were you, when FFP happens I'd stay away from railway tracks/multi story car parks and motorway bridges.
But chin up mungo, at least Norwich won't be whisking Rhodes away from Trampwood, Everton will be doing that.Steven Seagull

Rovers 1495 wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

"Everything is geared up for promotion make no mistake.We intend to hit the ground running"

LOL!

I guess you're another in denial as regards FFP. You think that if you keep believing it will blow over it just might. LOL!

Hold onto your dungaree's Mungo, it's about to get a bit turbulent for you lot.

When the first Salvo of FFP is fired let's see how hard you'll be laughing then.

You'll be sat in your nicotine stained walled Shadsworth bedsit for one that reeks of chip pan fat and fag smoke in your p1ss soaked yellow and brown (were once white) y fronts and your soup stained 1995 Rovers shirt with the Shearer letters on the back crumbling off, with your head in your hands as the gravity of the situation your "once proud " club finds itself in finally begins to manifest in your very small mind.

Oh how you yern for those days when an old man gave you his bank book and Manchester United were briefly your local rivals.

If I were you, when FFP happens I'd stay away from railway tracks/multi story car parks and motorway bridges.

But chin up mungo, at least Norwich won't be whisking Rhodes away from Trampwood, Everton will be doing that.

Score: 0

noddy57
12:54pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

He,s going nowhere`` besides why would he go to a club on the slide and miss out on a club going places ? .Everything is geared up for promotion make no mistake.We intend to hit the ground running and replace Burnley next season `` hows that for starters ?.

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]He,s going nowhere`` besides why would he go to a club on the slide and miss out on a club going places ? .Everything is geared up for promotion make no mistake.We intend to hit the ground running and replace Burnley next season `` hows that for starters ?.noddy57

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

He,s going nowhere`` besides why would he go to a club on the slide and miss out on a club going places ? .Everything is geared up for promotion make no mistake.We intend to hit the ground running and replace Burnley next season `` hows that for starters ?.

Score: 4

[deleted]
12:59pm Fri 6 Jun 14

[deleted]

"Everything is geared up for promotion make no mistake.We intend to hit the ground running"
LOL!
I guess you're another in denial as regards FFP. You think that if you keep believing it will blow over it just might. LOL!
Hold onto your dungaree's Mungo, it's about to get a bit turbulent for you lot.Super_Clarets

"Everything is geared up for promotion make no mistake.We intend to hit the ground running"

LOL!

I guess you're another in denial as regards FFP. You think that if you keep believing it will blow over it just might. LOL!

Hold onto your dungaree's Mungo, it's about to get a bit turbulent for you lot.

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
"Everything is geared up for promotion make no mistake.We intend to hit the ground running"
LOL!
I guess you're another in denial as regards FFP. You think that if you keep believing it will blow over it just might. LOL!
Hold onto your dungaree's Mungo, it's about to get a bit turbulent for you lot.[/p][/quote]To be sung after Bumleys first game in the PL (to the tune of MOTD)
Ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-haRovers 1495

Super_Clarets wrote…

"Everything is geared up for promotion make no mistake.We intend to hit the ground running"

LOL!

I guess you're another in denial as regards FFP. You think that if you keep believing it will blow over it just might. LOL!

Hold onto your dungaree's Mungo, it's about to get a bit turbulent for you lot.

Apparently Championship clubs are now over a £1 billion in debt.
Makes Venkys pale into insignificance, doesn't it.
There are therefore many worse off than us then and that's why ffp can't go ahead in it's present form.........Mungo.Harwoodstblue

Apparently Championship clubs are now over a £1 billion in debt.
Makes Venkys pale into insignificance, doesn't it.
There are therefore many worse off than us then and that's why ffp can't go ahead in it's present form.........Mungo.

Score: -1

AnotherPounding4Burnley
1:40pm Fri 6 Jun 14

I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.

I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.AnotherPounding4Burnley

I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.

Score: 4

slants
1:45pm Fri 6 Jun 14

No body wants the jibb lol

No body wants the jibb lolslants

No body wants the jibb lol

Score: -17

Steven Seagull
2:00pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Ewoodlegend wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes

Yeah because his goal scoring prowess would help fire us into the Premier League.......oh wait, hang on a minute.

[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes[/p][/quote]Yeah because his goal scoring prowess would help fire us into the Premier League.......oh wait, hang on a minute.Steven Seagull

Ewoodlegend wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes

Yeah because his goal scoring prowess would help fire us into the Premier League.......oh wait, hang on a minute.

Score: 0

Harwoodstblue
2:07pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Steven Seagull wrote…

Ewoodlegend wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes

Yeah because his goal scoring prowess would help fire us into the Premier League.......oh wait, hang on a minute.

Congratulations,
Been there, done it got the T shirt......Enjoy your brief encounter before the bump back down to earth.

[quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes[/p][/quote]Yeah because his goal scoring prowess would help fire us into the Premier League.......oh wait, hang on a minute.[/p][/quote]Congratulations,
Been there, done it got the T shirt......Enjoy your brief encounter before the bump back down to earth.Harwoodstblue

Steven Seagull wrote…

Ewoodlegend wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes

Yeah because his goal scoring prowess would help fire us into the Premier League.......oh wait, hang on a minute.

Congratulations,
Been there, done it got the T shirt......Enjoy your brief encounter before the bump back down to earth.

Score: 0

French Rover
2:11pm Fri 6 Jun 14

mammamiauk wrote…

AnotherPounding4Burn

ley wrote…

I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.

Rhodes is good at scoring goals but lacks pace as a player. In my opinion, Gestede is a much better player and Rhodes is not even worth £15 million - the latter still has 3 years left on his contract and any club who comes in for him will have to pay it off.

Rhodes is a class act and pace doesn`t matter a fig when you can score as many goals as he does. 87 in 148 games at HTFC and 52 goals in 96 games for us. Who needs pace?

Anyone that buys him will get guaranteed goals from him. Goals win games and trophies - so at some point a prem club will come in for him with the right money and we can let the lad fulfil his ambitions, take a big fee for him and say thanks JR...!

[quote][p][bold]mammamiauk[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.[/p][/quote]Rhodes is good at scoring goals but lacks pace as a player. In my opinion, Gestede is a much better player and Rhodes is not even worth £15 million - the latter still has 3 years left on his contract and any club who comes in for him will have to pay it off.[/p][/quote]Rhodes is a class act and pace doesn`t matter a fig when you can score as many goals as he does. 87 in 148 games at HTFC and 52 goals in 96 games for us. Who needs pace?
Anyone that buys him will get guaranteed goals from him. Goals win games and trophies - so at some point a prem club will come in for him with the right money and we can let the lad fulfil his ambitions, take a big fee for him and say thanks JR...!French Rover

mammamiauk wrote…

AnotherPounding4Burn

ley wrote…

I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.

Rhodes is good at scoring goals but lacks pace as a player. In my opinion, Gestede is a much better player and Rhodes is not even worth £15 million - the latter still has 3 years left on his contract and any club who comes in for him will have to pay it off.

Rhodes is a class act and pace doesn`t matter a fig when you can score as many goals as he does. 87 in 148 games at HTFC and 52 goals in 96 games for us. Who needs pace?

Anyone that buys him will get guaranteed goals from him. Goals win games and trophies - so at some point a prem club will come in for him with the right money and we can let the lad fulfil his ambitions, take a big fee for him and say thanks JR...!

Score: 11

AnotherPounding4Burnley
2:32pm Fri 6 Jun 14

In my opinion Ings would be a better risk for anyone willing to shell out 5 million for one good season. The only risk being is, as he plays like a flat out horsewhipped donkey, he is more prone to pick up injuries, whereas Rhodes, who just seems to have a knack of scoring shed loads of goals in third gear,, is why he's so expensive. So in order to take the cheaper riskier option, Ings at 5 million would do the trick

In my opinion Ings would be a better risk for anyone willing to shell out 5 million for one good season. The only risk being is, as he plays like a flat out horsewhipped donkey, he is more prone to pick up injuries, whereas Rhodes, who just seems to have a knack of scoring shed loads of goals in third gear,, is why he's so expensive. So in order to take the cheaper riskier option, Ings at 5 million would do the trickAnotherPounding4Burnley

In my opinion Ings would be a better risk for anyone willing to shell out 5 million for one good season. The only risk being is, as he plays like a flat out horsewhipped donkey, he is more prone to pick up injuries, whereas Rhodes, who just seems to have a knack of scoring shed loads of goals in third gear,, is why he's so expensive. So in order to take the cheaper riskier option, Ings at 5 million would do the trick

Score: -7

jim 2012
2:21pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

Burnley have opened talks with goalkeeper Tom Heaton over a new contract,
rival clubs, including Heaton's former club Cardiff, are keeping a close eye on his situation at Turf Moor,. do keep up

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]Burnley have opened talks with goalkeeper Tom Heaton over a new contract,
rival clubs, including Heaton's former club Cardiff, are keeping a close eye on his situation at Turf Moor,. do keep upjim 2012

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

Burnley have opened talks with goalkeeper Tom Heaton over a new contract,
rival clubs, including Heaton's former club Cardiff, are keeping a close eye on his situation at Turf Moor,. do keep up

Score: 7

jim 2012
2:24pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

Norwich City manager Neil Adams has rubbished reports suggesting he has bid for Blackburn Rovers striker Jordan Rhodes.
Norwich have, however, completed a deal to bring Lewis Grabban to Carrow Road from Bournemouth - a man who netted 22 times in all competitions last season

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]Norwich City manager Neil Adams has rubbished reports suggesting he has bid for Blackburn Rovers striker Jordan Rhodes.
Norwich have, however, completed a deal to bring Lewis Grabban to Carrow Road from Bournemouth - a man who netted 22 times in all competitions last seasonjim 2012

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

Norwich City manager Neil Adams has rubbished reports suggesting he has bid for Blackburn Rovers striker Jordan Rhodes.
Norwich have, however, completed a deal to bring Lewis Grabban to Carrow Road from Bournemouth - a man who netted 22 times in all competitions last season

Score: 8

jim 2012
2:25pm Fri 6 Jun 14

jim 2012 wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

Norwich City manager Neil Adams has rubbished reports suggesting he has bid for Blackburn Rovers striker Jordan Rhodes.
Norwich have, however, completed a deal to bring Lewis Grabban to Carrow Road from Bournemouth - a man who netted 22 times in all competitions last season

do keep up

[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]Norwich City manager Neil Adams has rubbished reports suggesting he has bid for Blackburn Rovers striker Jordan Rhodes.
Norwich have, however, completed a deal to bring Lewis Grabban to Carrow Road from Bournemouth - a man who netted 22 times in all competitions last season[/p][/quote]do keep upjim 2012

jim 2012 wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

Norwich City manager Neil Adams has rubbished reports suggesting he has bid for Blackburn Rovers striker Jordan Rhodes.
Norwich have, however, completed a deal to bring Lewis Grabban to Carrow Road from Bournemouth - a man who netted 22 times in all competitions last season

do keep up

Score: 6

[deleted]
3:04pm Fri 6 Jun 14

[deleted]

[quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Rovers 1495[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
"Everything is geared up for promotion make no mistake.We intend to hit the ground running"
LOL!
I guess you're another in denial as regards FFP. You think that if you keep believing it will blow over it just might. LOL!
Hold onto your dungaree's Mungo, it's about to get a bit turbulent for you lot.[/p][/quote]To be sung after Bumleys first game in the PL (to the tune of MOTD)
Ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha
Ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha ha ha ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha[/p][/quote]When the first Salvo of FFP is fired let's see how hard you'll be laughing then.
You'll be sat in your nicotine stained walled Shadsworth bedsit for one that reeks of chip pan fat and fag smoke in your p1ss soaked yellow and brown (were once white) y fronts and your soup stained 1995 Rovers shirt with the Shearer letters on the back crumbling off, with your head in your hands as the gravity of the situation your "once proud " club finds itself in finally begins to manifest in your very small mind.
Oh how you yern for those days when an old man gave you his bank book and Manchester United were briefly your local rivals.
If I were you, when FFP happens I'd stay away from railway tracks/multi story car parks and motorway bridges.
But chin up mungo, at least Norwich won't be whisking Rhodes away from Trampwood, Everton will be doing that.[/p][/quote]The only reason you t*ssers are doing a jig right now is because you haven't kicked a ball yet in the Premier League.
Oh and by the way, there's an 'a' in yearnRovers 1495

Steven Seagull wrote…

Rovers 1495 wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

"Everything is geared up for promotion make no mistake.We intend to hit the ground running"

LOL!

I guess you're another in denial as regards FFP. You think that if you keep believing it will blow over it just might. LOL!

Hold onto your dungaree's Mungo, it's about to get a bit turbulent for you lot.

When the first Salvo of FFP is fired let's see how hard you'll be laughing then.

You'll be sat in your nicotine stained walled Shadsworth bedsit for one that reeks of chip pan fat and fag smoke in your p1ss soaked yellow and brown (were once white) y fronts and your soup stained 1995 Rovers shirt with the Shearer letters on the back crumbling off, with your head in your hands as the gravity of the situation your "once proud " club finds itself in finally begins to manifest in your very small mind.

Oh how you yern for those days when an old man gave you his bank book and Manchester United were briefly your local rivals.

If I were you, when FFP happens I'd stay away from railway tracks/multi story car parks and motorway bridges.

But chin up mungo, at least Norwich won't be whisking Rhodes away from Trampwood, Everton will be doing that.

The only reason you t*ssers are doing a jig right now is because you haven't kicked a ball yet in the Premier League.

Oh and by the way, there's an 'a' in yearn

Score: 0

RobH2O
3:26pm Fri 6 Jun 14

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley wrote…

In my opinion Ings would be a better risk for anyone willing to shell out 5 million for one good season. The only risk being is, as he plays like a flat out horsewhipped donkey, he is more prone to pick up injuries, whereas Rhodes, who just seems to have a knack of scoring shed loads of goals in third gear,, is why he's so expensive. So in order to take the cheaper riskier option, Ings at 5 million would do the trick

"In my opinion". Buying that is like seeing Swiss Tony for a motor.

[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
In my opinion Ings would be a better risk for anyone willing to shell out 5 million for one good season. The only risk being is, as he plays like a flat out horsewhipped donkey, he is more prone to pick up injuries, whereas Rhodes, who just seems to have a knack of scoring shed loads of goals in third gear,, is why he's so expensive. So in order to take the cheaper riskier option, Ings at 5 million would do the trick[/p][/quote]"In my opinion". Buying that is like seeing Swiss Tony for a motor.RobH2O

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley wrote…

In my opinion Ings would be a better risk for anyone willing to shell out 5 million for one good season. The only risk being is, as he plays like a flat out horsewhipped donkey, he is more prone to pick up injuries, whereas Rhodes, who just seems to have a knack of scoring shed loads of goals in third gear,, is why he's so expensive. So in order to take the cheaper riskier option, Ings at 5 million would do the trick

"In my opinion". Buying that is like seeing Swiss Tony for a motor.

Score: 13

RobH2O
3:30pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Ewoodlegend wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes

You'd part with your empty scrotum to keep him.

[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes[/p][/quote]You'd part with your empty scrotum to keep him.RobH2O

Ewoodlegend wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes

You'd part with your empty scrotum to keep him.

Score: 5

bluenwhite
4:28pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

Thick as a plank :-)
That's why dings and dyche are off then? :-)
Notice not one post by you on that story on the dingle page?
Sooooo obsessed.
Thick as a plank :-)

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]Thick as a plank :-)
That's why dings and dyche are off then? :-)
Notice not one post by you on that story on the dingle page?
Sooooo obsessed.
Thick as a plank :-)bluenwhite

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

Thick as a plank :-)
That's why dings and dyche are off then? :-)
Notice not one post by you on that story on the dingle page?
Sooooo obsessed.
Thick as a plank :-)

Score: 5

Ewood_Mark
6:28pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Shame we couldn't get rid of the overweight piece of sh!t . Another player who sits around waiting for his pay packet rather than putting a shift in. The only way is down now for monotone Bowyer and his team of chicken scoffing donkeys

BOWYER OUT

Shame we couldn't get rid of the overweight piece of sh!t . Another player who sits around waiting for his pay packet rather than putting a shift in. The only way is down now for monotone Bowyer and his team of chicken scoffing donkeys
BOWYER OUTEwood_Mark

Shame we couldn't get rid of the overweight piece of sh!t . Another player who sits around waiting for his pay packet rather than putting a shift in. The only way is down now for monotone Bowyer and his team of chicken scoffing donkeys

BOWYER OUT

Score: -3

Maxrus
6:30pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Steven Seagull wrote…

Ewoodlegend wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes

Yeah because his goal scoring prowess would help fire us into the Premier League.......oh wait, hang on a minute.

Not sure about this, they need their extra digits as each one counts for 1000 home fans. Without these their average home attendance would be below 14,000...... Oh wait, hang on a minute.

[quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes[/p][/quote]Yeah because his goal scoring prowess would help fire us into the Premier League.......oh wait, hang on a minute.[/p][/quote]Not sure about this, they need their extra digits as each one counts for 1000 home fans. Without these their average home attendance would be below 14,000...... Oh wait, hang on a minute.Maxrus

Steven Seagull wrote…

Ewoodlegend wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

you would give your extra fingers for a player like rhodes

Yeah because his goal scoring prowess would help fire us into the Premier League.......oh wait, hang on a minute.

Not sure about this, they need their extra digits as each one counts for 1000 home fans. Without these their average home attendance would be below 14,000...... Oh wait, hang on a minute.

Score: 1

Welsh Rover
6:56pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Hahaha... ''No smoke without fire.''

That's right, no sports journalist has ever fabricated a story just to sell newspapers/get 'hits' on their website, linked a manager with an old player and just assumed he must be after him or - and this is the current trend - believed every rumour they read on social media and printed it as an exclusive.

Hahaha... ''No smoke without fire.''
That's right, no sports journalist has ever fabricated a story just to sell newspapers/get 'hits' on their website, linked a manager with an old player and just assumed he must be after him or - and this is the current trend - believed every rumour they read on social media and printed it as an exclusive.Welsh Rover

Hahaha... ''No smoke without fire.''

That's right, no sports journalist has ever fabricated a story just to sell newspapers/get 'hits' on their website, linked a manager with an old player and just assumed he must be after him or - and this is the current trend - believed every rumour they read on social media and printed it as an exclusive.

Score: 4

owd nick
7:26pm Fri 6 Jun 14

French Rover wrote…

mammamiauk wrote…

AnotherPounding4Burn

ley wrote…

I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.

Rhodes is good at scoring goals but lacks pace as a player. In my opinion, Gestede is a much better player and Rhodes is not even worth £15 million - the latter still has 3 years left on his contract and any club who comes in for him will have to pay it off.

Rhodes is a class act and pace doesn`t matter a fig when you can score as many goals as he does. 87 in 148 games at HTFC and 52 goals in 96 games for us. Who needs pace?

Anyone that buys him will get guaranteed goals from him. Goals win games and trophies - so at some point a prem club will come in for him with the right money and we can let the lad fulfil his ambitions, take a big fee for him and say thanks JR...!

Totally agree, with both of you!

Rhodes does lack real pace but if we play to his strengths next season can you imagine the carnage he and Gestede will create!

Think about it, for the best part of two thirds of the season he was playing in a formation that certainly didn't suit his style, but ended up with 25 goals, that is phenomenal by any standard.

[quote][p][bold]French Rover[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mammamiauk[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.[/p][/quote]Rhodes is good at scoring goals but lacks pace as a player. In my opinion, Gestede is a much better player and Rhodes is not even worth £15 million - the latter still has 3 years left on his contract and any club who comes in for him will have to pay it off.[/p][/quote]Rhodes is a class act and pace doesn`t matter a fig when you can score as many goals as he does. 87 in 148 games at HTFC and 52 goals in 96 games for us. Who needs pace?
Anyone that buys him will get guaranteed goals from him. Goals win games and trophies - so at some point a prem club will come in for him with the right money and we can let the lad fulfil his ambitions, take a big fee for him and say thanks JR...![/p][/quote]Totally agree, with both of you!
Rhodes does lack real pace but if we play to his strengths next season can you imagine the carnage he and Gestede will create!
Think about it, for the best part of two thirds of the season he was playing in a formation that certainly didn't suit his style, but ended up with 25 goals, that is phenomenal by any standard.owd nick

French Rover wrote…

mammamiauk wrote…

AnotherPounding4Burn

ley wrote…

I am a Burnley fan but i can sympathize, you are in a better position with Rhodes than we are with Ings. Rhodes is tied in with a lengthy contract, Ings has less than 12 months left.
If a massive bid came in for rhodes of say 15 million, then fair do's but as soon as a big club slaps 5 million on the table for Ings, he will hand in a request and demand to leave, leaving us with pin money as there is a 20% sell on clause.
Still 5 million is good business for one good season.

Rhodes is good at scoring goals but lacks pace as a player. In my opinion, Gestede is a much better player and Rhodes is not even worth £15 million - the latter still has 3 years left on his contract and any club who comes in for him will have to pay it off.

Rhodes is a class act and pace doesn`t matter a fig when you can score as many goals as he does. 87 in 148 games at HTFC and 52 goals in 96 games for us. Who needs pace?

Anyone that buys him will get guaranteed goals from him. Goals win games and trophies - so at some point a prem club will come in for him with the right money and we can let the lad fulfil his ambitions, take a big fee for him and say thanks JR...!

Totally agree, with both of you!

Rhodes does lack real pace but if we play to his strengths next season can you imagine the carnage he and Gestede will create!

Think about it, for the best part of two thirds of the season he was playing in a formation that certainly didn't suit his style, but ended up with 25 goals, that is phenomenal by any standard.

Score: 2

Super_Clarets
7:23pm Fri 6 Jun 14

The simple fact is Burnley have no need to sell their key players. The issue the no-dad's cannot seem to grasp is that Burnley FC are now in the Premier League and can therefore offer Premier League contracts and Premier League football. Why would Ings move to sit on the bench at Newcastle? He wont. He's more than happy at Burnley being a first choice striker, building his reputation, scoring goals in a team that's made for him under the best young manager in English football. Ings and Trippier will be England internationals whilst at Burnley.

Move on no-dad's its becoming tedious now. We heard it all before with Trippier and look what happened.

In other news......

"Newcastle United have signed Spanish striker Ayoze Perez from Tenerife on what the Magpies describe as a "long-term contract. Perez, scored 16 goals in 34 games last season. I'm very happy to be here to start this new adventure, he told Newcastle's official website."

You clowns just keep getting it wrong. what a shame for you.

The simple fact is Burnley have no need to sell their key players. The issue the no-dad's cannot seem to grasp is that Burnley FC are now in the Premier League and can therefore offer Premier League contracts and Premier League football. Why would Ings move to sit on the bench at Newcastle? He wont. He's more than happy at Burnley being a first choice striker, building his reputation, scoring goals in a team that's made for him under the best young manager in English football. Ings and Trippier will be England internationals whilst at Burnley.
Move on no-dad's its becoming tedious now. We heard it all before with Trippier and look what happened.
In other news......
"Newcastle United have signed Spanish striker Ayoze Perez from Tenerife on what the Magpies describe as a "long-term contract. Perez, scored 16 goals in 34 games last season. I'm very happy to be here to start this new adventure, he told Newcastle's official website."
You clowns just keep getting it wrong. what a shame for you.Super_Clarets

The simple fact is Burnley have no need to sell their key players. The issue the no-dad's cannot seem to grasp is that Burnley FC are now in the Premier League and can therefore offer Premier League contracts and Premier League football. Why would Ings move to sit on the bench at Newcastle? He wont. He's more than happy at Burnley being a first choice striker, building his reputation, scoring goals in a team that's made for him under the best young manager in English football. Ings and Trippier will be England internationals whilst at Burnley.

Move on no-dad's its becoming tedious now. We heard it all before with Trippier and look what happened.

In other news......

"Newcastle United have signed Spanish striker Ayoze Perez from Tenerife on what the Magpies describe as a "long-term contract. Perez, scored 16 goals in 34 games last season. I'm very happy to be here to start this new adventure, he told Newcastle's official website."

You clowns just keep getting it wrong. what a shame for you.

Score: -5

Welsh Rover
7:36pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Hahaha... ''You clowns just keep getting it wrong.''

Nice one, Crazy Ralph, it's not as if you're posting on an article debunking the very same transfer rumour you were championing yesterday. You couldn't make it up. Well...

Hahaha... ''You clowns just keep getting it wrong.''
Nice one, Crazy Ralph, it's not as if you're posting on an article debunking the very same transfer rumour you were championing yesterday. You couldn't make it up. Well...Welsh Rover

Hahaha... ''You clowns just keep getting it wrong.''

Nice one, Crazy Ralph, it's not as if you're posting on an article debunking the very same transfer rumour you were championing yesterday. You couldn't make it up. Well...

Score: 3

baldie
7:39pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Something's got me thinking.
Burnley have a great season and go up.
They bank £120m and maybe spend £20 m,it's just an example.
If they come down,and I'm not saying they will,their gates will fall to 10/11 k average.
How do they spend the remainder whilst still complying with FFP?

Something's got me thinking.
Burnley have a great season and go up.
They bank £120m and maybe spend £20 m,it's just an example.
If they come down,and I'm not saying they will,their gates will fall to 10/11 k average.
How do they spend the remainder whilst still complying with FFP?baldie

Something's got me thinking.
Burnley have a great season and go up.
They bank £120m and maybe spend £20 m,it's just an example.
If they come down,and I'm not saying they will,their gates will fall to 10/11 k average.
How do they spend the remainder whilst still complying with FFP?

Score: 1

Super_Clarets
7:41pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.

The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.

Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.

Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.
The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.
Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.Super_Clarets

Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.

The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.

Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.

Score: -4

Super_Clarets
7:43pm Fri 6 Jun 14

"They bank £120m and maybe spend £20 m,it's just an example.
If they come down,and I'm not saying they will,their gates will fall to 10/11 k average. How do they spend the remainder whilst still complying with FFP?"

That's money the club have generated. FFP is only interested in horrific loss making clubs, like yours. Sensible well run clubs will be financially secure for life because they only spend what they earn.

"They bank £120m and maybe spend £20 m,it's just an example.
If they come down,and I'm not saying they will,their gates will fall to 10/11 k average. How do they spend the remainder whilst still complying with FFP?"
That's money the club have generated. FFP is only interested in horrific loss making clubs, like yours. Sensible well run clubs will be financially secure for life because they only spend what they earn.Super_Clarets

"They bank £120m and maybe spend £20 m,it's just an example.
If they come down,and I'm not saying they will,their gates will fall to 10/11 k average. How do they spend the remainder whilst still complying with FFP?"

That's money the club have generated. FFP is only interested in horrific loss making clubs, like yours. Sensible well run clubs will be financially secure for life because they only spend what they earn.

Score: -3

jim 2012
8:46pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

The simple fact is Burnley have no need to sell their key players. The issue the no-dad's cannot seem to grasp is that Burnley FC are now in the Premier League and can therefore offer Premier League contracts and Premier League football. Why would Ings move to sit on the bench at Newcastle? He wont. He's more than happy at Burnley being a first choice striker, building his reputation, scoring goals in a team that's made for him under the best young manager in English football. Ings and Trippier will be England internationals whilst at Burnley.

Move on no-dad's its becoming tedious now. We heard it all before with Trippier and look what happened.

In other news......

"Newcastle United have signed Spanish striker Ayoze Perez from Tenerife on what the Magpies describe as a "long-term contract. Perez, scored 16 goals in 34 games last season. I'm very happy to be here to start this new adventure, he told Newcastle's official website."

You clowns just keep getting it wrong. what a shame for you.

no one said that burnley need to sell players
no one cares what League burnley play there football
cant see the likes of man city man united and most of the other teams bricking it because burnley are in the prem
and when you say We heard it all before you need to think back to some
of rubbish that you dingels said all last season
"Newcastle United are just one of a number of clubs looking at danny ings
southampton and west brom being the other clubs
and as you put it the best young manager in English football
will attract the attention of bigger and better clubs

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
The simple fact is Burnley have no need to sell their key players. The issue the no-dad's cannot seem to grasp is that Burnley FC are now in the Premier League and can therefore offer Premier League contracts and Premier League football. Why would Ings move to sit on the bench at Newcastle? He wont. He's more than happy at Burnley being a first choice striker, building his reputation, scoring goals in a team that's made for him under the best young manager in English football. Ings and Trippier will be England internationals whilst at Burnley.
Move on no-dad's its becoming tedious now. We heard it all before with Trippier and look what happened.
In other news......
"Newcastle United have signed Spanish striker Ayoze Perez from Tenerife on what the Magpies describe as a "long-term contract. Perez, scored 16 goals in 34 games last season. I'm very happy to be here to start this new adventure, he told Newcastle's official website."
You clowns just keep getting it wrong. what a shame for you.[/p][/quote]no one said that burnley need to sell players
no one cares what League burnley play there football
cant see the likes of man city man united and most of the other teams bricking it because burnley are in the prem
and when you say We heard it all before you need to think back to some
of rubbish that you dingels said all last season
"Newcastle United are just one of a number of clubs looking at danny ings
southampton and west brom being the other clubs
and as you put it the best young manager in English football
will attract the attention of bigger and better clubsjim 2012

Super_Clarets wrote…

The simple fact is Burnley have no need to sell their key players. The issue the no-dad's cannot seem to grasp is that Burnley FC are now in the Premier League and can therefore offer Premier League contracts and Premier League football. Why would Ings move to sit on the bench at Newcastle? He wont. He's more than happy at Burnley being a first choice striker, building his reputation, scoring goals in a team that's made for him under the best young manager in English football. Ings and Trippier will be England internationals whilst at Burnley.

Move on no-dad's its becoming tedious now. We heard it all before with Trippier and look what happened.

In other news......

"Newcastle United have signed Spanish striker Ayoze Perez from Tenerife on what the Magpies describe as a "long-term contract. Perez, scored 16 goals in 34 games last season. I'm very happy to be here to start this new adventure, he told Newcastle's official website."

You clowns just keep getting it wrong. what a shame for you.

no one said that burnley need to sell players
no one cares what League burnley play there football
cant see the likes of man city man united and most of the other teams bricking it because burnley are in the prem
and when you say We heard it all before you need to think back to some
of rubbish that you dingels said all last season
"Newcastle United are just one of a number of clubs looking at danny ings
southampton and west brom being the other clubs
and as you put it the best young manager in English football
will attract the attention of bigger and better clubs

Score: 0

Old age pensioner
8:57pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

NH

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
No smoke without fire.
Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.[/p][/quote]NHOld age pensioner

Super_Clarets wrote…

No smoke without fire.

Expect his departure before he kicks another ball for you.

NH

Score: 0

Old age pensioner
8:58pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.

The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.

Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.

NH

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.
The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.
Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.[/p][/quote]NHOld age pensioner

Super_Clarets wrote…

Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.

The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.

Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.

NH

Score: 1

Super_Clarets
10:40pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Steven Seagull wrote…

Old age pensioner wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.

The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.

Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.

NH

Obsessed p1ss drenched octogenarian.

Couldn't have put it better myself.

[quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Old age pensioner[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.
The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.
Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.[/p][/quote]NH[/p][/quote]Obsessed p1ss drenched octogenarian.[/p][/quote]Couldn't have put it better myself.Super_Clarets

Steven Seagull wrote…

Old age pensioner wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.

The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.

Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.

NH

Obsessed p1ss drenched octogenarian.

Couldn't have put it better myself.

Score: -3

bluenwhite
11:34pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

The simple fact is Burnley have no need to sell their key players. The issue the no-dad's cannot seem to grasp is that Burnley FC are now in the Premier League and can therefore offer Premier League contracts and Premier League football. Why would Ings move to sit on the bench at Newcastle? He wont. He's more than happy at Burnley being a first choice striker, building his reputation, scoring goals in a team that's made for him under the best young manager in English football. Ings and Trippier will be England internationals whilst at Burnley.

Move on no-dad's its becoming tedious now. We heard it all before with Trippier and look what happened.

In other news......

"Newcastle United have signed Spanish striker Ayoze Perez from Tenerife on what the Magpies describe as a "long-term contract. Perez, scored 16 goals in 34 games last season. I'm very happy to be here to start this new adventure, he told Newcastle's official website."

You clowns just keep getting it wrong. what a shame for you.

Yep and rodriguez, and Austin!!
Thick as a plank and twice as Numb :-)

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
The simple fact is Burnley have no need to sell their key players. The issue the no-dad's cannot seem to grasp is that Burnley FC are now in the Premier League and can therefore offer Premier League contracts and Premier League football. Why would Ings move to sit on the bench at Newcastle? He wont. He's more than happy at Burnley being a first choice striker, building his reputation, scoring goals in a team that's made for him under the best young manager in English football. Ings and Trippier will be England internationals whilst at Burnley.
Move on no-dad's its becoming tedious now. We heard it all before with Trippier and look what happened.
In other news......
"Newcastle United have signed Spanish striker Ayoze Perez from Tenerife on what the Magpies describe as a "long-term contract. Perez, scored 16 goals in 34 games last season. I'm very happy to be here to start this new adventure, he told Newcastle's official website."
You clowns just keep getting it wrong. what a shame for you.[/p][/quote]Yep and rodriguez, and Austin!!
Thick as a plank and twice as Numb :-)bluenwhite

Super_Clarets wrote…

The simple fact is Burnley have no need to sell their key players. The issue the no-dad's cannot seem to grasp is that Burnley FC are now in the Premier League and can therefore offer Premier League contracts and Premier League football. Why would Ings move to sit on the bench at Newcastle? He wont. He's more than happy at Burnley being a first choice striker, building his reputation, scoring goals in a team that's made for him under the best young manager in English football. Ings and Trippier will be England internationals whilst at Burnley.

Move on no-dad's its becoming tedious now. We heard it all before with Trippier and look what happened.

In other news......

"Newcastle United have signed Spanish striker Ayoze Perez from Tenerife on what the Magpies describe as a "long-term contract. Perez, scored 16 goals in 34 games last season. I'm very happy to be here to start this new adventure, he told Newcastle's official website."

You clowns just keep getting it wrong. what a shame for you.

Yep and rodriguez, and Austin!!
Thick as a plank and twice as Numb :-)

Score: 3

greenscreener
11:43pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Super_Clarets wrote…

Steven Seagull wrote…

Old age pensioner wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.

The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.

Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.

NH

Obsessed p1ss drenched octogenarian.

Couldn't have put it better myself.

But you did.

Are you not even slightly embarrassed that the only people who give a sh!t about you and your opinions are your own multiple accounts and the voices in your head ? Pathetic.

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Old age pensioner[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.
The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.
Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.[/p][/quote]NH[/p][/quote]Obsessed p1ss drenched octogenarian.[/p][/quote]Couldn't have put it better myself.[/p][/quote]But you did.
Are you not even slightly embarrassed that the only people who give a sh!t about you and your opinions are your own multiple accounts and the voices in your head ? Pathetic.greenscreener

Super_Clarets wrote…

Steven Seagull wrote…

Old age pensioner wrote…

Super_Clarets wrote…

Rhodes will go, most of you have already accepted it.

The transfer embargo will happen in January, most of you have accepted it.

Blackburn Rovers are staying down forever, it's time you accepted that one also.

NH

Obsessed p1ss drenched octogenarian.

Couldn't have put it better myself.

But you did.

Are you not even slightly embarrassed that the only people who give a sh!t about you and your opinions are your own multiple accounts and the voices in your head ? Pathetic.

Score: 5

A Darener
4:02pm Sat 7 Jun 14

The one thing the Rovers fans know is that next season is going to be a good one for both BRFC and for their fans on two counts. One we are going to improve on last seasons result and two we will have the satisfaction of watching the train crash that is BFC. Even if count one is missed there is no way point two will be, therefore making it a season to remember.

The one thing the Rovers fans know is that next season is going to be a good one for both BRFC and for their fans on two counts. One we are going to improve on last seasons result and two we will have the satisfaction of watching the train crash that is BFC. Even if count one is missed there is no way point two will be, therefore making it a season to remember.A Darener

The one thing the Rovers fans know is that next season is going to be a good one for both BRFC and for their fans on two counts. One we are going to improve on last seasons result and two we will have the satisfaction of watching the train crash that is BFC. Even if count one is missed there is no way point two will be, therefore making it a season to remember.

Score: 3

gb1882
8:20am Mon 9 Jun 14

There isnt another club in this country daft enough to pay the wage he is on. Hence why he has limited ambition of staying in the Championship and signed a new deal. He can't even get a start for a 3rd rate country like Scotland.

There isnt another club in this country daft enough to pay the wage he is on. Hence why he has limited ambition of staying in the Championship and signed a new deal. He can't even get a start for a 3rd rate country like Scotland.gb1882

There isnt another club in this country daft enough to pay the wage he is on. Hence why he has limited ambition of staying in the Championship and signed a new deal. He can't even get a start for a 3rd rate country like Scotland.

Ipsoregulated

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here