If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

An Egyptian magazine claims that six American Islamist activists who work with the Obama administration are Muslim Brotherhood operatives who enjoy strong influence over U.S. policy.

The Dec. 22 story published in Egypt's Rose El-Youssef magazine (read an IPT translation here) suggests the six turned the White House "from a position hostile to Islamic groups and organizations in the world to the largest and most important supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood."

The story is largely unsourced, but its publication is considered significant in raising the issue to Egyptian readers.

The six named people include: Arif Alikhan, assistant secretary of Homeland Security for policy development; Mohammed Elibiary, a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council; Rashad Hussain, the U.S. special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference; Salam al-Marayati, co-founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC); Imam Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA); and Eboo Patel, a member of President Obama's Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships.

Alikhan is a founder of the World Islamic Organization, which the magazine identifies as a Brotherhood "subsidiary." It suggests that Alikhan was responsible for the "file of Islamic states" in the White House and that he provides the direct link between the Obama administration and the Arab Spring revolutions of 2011.

Elibiary, who has endorsed the ideas of radical Muslim Brotherhood luminary Sayyid Qutb, may have leaked secret materials contained in Department of Homeland Security databases, according to the magazine. He, however, denies having any connection with the Brotherhood.
Read More>http://www.investigativeproject.org/...od-infiltrates
From the for what it is worth department, I have not investigated any of this.

The difference between pigs and people is that when they tell you you're cured it isn't a good thing.

It really doesn't matter what anybody on this side of the pond thinks about the article -- what really matters is what the Egyptians think.

Fact is, Barry has not made it a secret that one of his objectives is to lend credibility and support to the Islamic world. He has bowed to Muslim kings, Muslim royalty, it matters not as long as the guy is the so-called "leader" of his country.

Barry has bowed and scraped and said lofty words about the "religion of peace."

It's entirely plausible and even possible that the article's assertions are true. Since Barry does not see evil in the Muslim world, infiltrating his Oministration should be a no-brainer.

One thing is clear -- I don't see you refuting anything that's in the article.

It really doesn't matter what anybody on this side of the pond thinks about the article -- what really matters is what the Egyptians think.

Fact is, Barry has not made it a secret that one of his objectives is to lend credibility and support to the Islamic world. He has bowed to Muslim kings, Muslim royalty, it matters not as long as the guy is the so-called "leader" of his country.

Barry has bowed and scraped and said lofty words about the "religion of peace."

It's entirely plausible and even possible that the article's assertions are true. Since Barry does not see evil in the Muslim world, infiltrating his Oministration should be a no-brainer.

One thing is clear -- I don't see you refuting anything that's in the article.

I'm not going to refute it unless somebody other than the Muslim Brotherhood or a magazine not in their country (something more credible) verifies it. This thread tells me that people are so much into their side, that they'll fall for anything.

And Obama has already condemned terrorism, no matter who did it. Muslim or whoever.

I'm not going to refute it unless somebody other than the Muslim Brotherhood or a magazine not in their country (something more credible) verifies it. This thread tells me that people are so much into their side, that they'll fall for anything.

And Obama has already condemned terrorism, no matter who did it. Muslim or whoever.

No.

Obama utters the words of condemnation. But as he is as phony and plastic as the day is long, those words have no meaning.

And I'd respectfully suggest to hell with what this thread is telling you. Look at the names they're naming and the level of detail the article goes into.

It may or may not be true. But my money is on the article. It simply squares from all different angles.