Christian: About extensibility of the sem. markup. What about language that evolve. That what PaulVincent's question and he got an action to investigate that. I suggest to drop this action. If this is an issue. It will come back.

15:36:04 [Francois]

Chris: Other actions?

15:36:25 [Francois]

Chris: Action on Dave Reynold rephrase requ... : done.

15:36:45 [Francois]

Chris: Action on Sandro list requirements. Continued.

15:37:14 [Francois]

Sandro: in a lot of cases there are different wirdings.

15:37:26 [Francois]

s/wirdings/wordings/

15:37:32 [LeoraMorgenstern]

Sandro, I would like t ohelp

15:37:35 [LeoraMorgenstern]

though I'm not an editor

15:37:39 [Francois]

Sandro: Does someone want to collaborate with me on this?

15:37:51 [ChrisW]

actions 30, 31, 36 are closed

15:38:18 [Francois]

Chris: Moe to timing of next release of working draft.

15:38:45 [Francois]

Chris: at f2f we agreed on a deadline. Can we achieve the goal to work on new use cases.

15:39:05 [AlexKozlenkov]

zakim, unmute me

15:39:05 [Zakim]

AlexKozlenkov should no longer be muted

15:39:06 [Francois]

Chris: New use cases have been inco

15:39:07 [AlexKozlenkov]

q+

15:39:14 [Francois]

rporated.

15:39:46 [Francois]

Chris: two UC need review.

15:39:58 [Francois]

AlexKoz: We submitted a UC.

15:40:22 [Francois]

AlexKoz: It will be one of 3 UC. We are interviewing people.

15:40:36 [Francois]

AlexKooz: will become more generic.

15:40:49 [DaveReynolds]

q+

15:40:58 [Francois]

s/Kooz/Koz/

15:41:15 [DaveReynolds]

q-

15:41:23 [Francois]

Chris: the WG has a lot of specific UC. We try to abstract some commonalities.

15:41:39 [AlexKozlenkov]

zakim, mute me

15:41:39 [Zakim]

AlexKozlenkov should now be muted

15:41:44 [Francois]

Chris: New UC are not likely to make it into the next working draft.

15:42:18 [Francois]

Chris: For the next working draft, we had 3 candidate UC to be re-reviewed. One of them is the XML one. We missed the deadline.

Christian: I suuggest that Harold extracts the part (of RIFRAF) to be appended to UCR.

16:04:53 [Franc]

s/suuggest/suggest/

16:05:54 [ChrisW]

q?

16:06:01 [Franc]

Chris: Question on UCR doocuments?

16:06:06 [MalaMehrotra]

MalaMehrotra has joined #rif

16:06:21 [Franc]

Sandro: Let us record plan in IRC. Chris, please help me:

16:06:33 [Franc]

3 parts:

16:06:38 [Franc]

- 2 new UC

16:06:41 [Franc]

- 1 revised UC

16:06:47 [Franc]

- requirements from f2f

16:06:56 [Franc]

- discriminator section from RIFRAF.

16:07:11 [Franc]

This is new content of new UCR darft.

16:07:17 [sandro]

Chris: 2 news uses cases, 1 revised use case, the requirements from F2F, descriminators section of F2F --- that's the new content of WD2 of UCR. The rest will be the same modulo minor editorial changes.

16:07:54 [Franc]

Chris: RIFRAF as next point of our agenda.

16:08:21 [Franc]

Chris: Main content discussed at f2f will go into next working draft.

16:09:17 [Franc]

Chris: syntactic, semantic, pragmatic discriminators. At the f2f we went over all of them, mde sure everyone understands, moved material,

16:09:49 [Franc]

Chris: a large number of requirements have been moved into RIFRAF.

16:10:14 [Franc]

Chris: eg 'RIF will support comments' moved to syntactic discriminators.

16:10:42 [Franc]

Chris: Strong negation is another example.

16:11:15 [AxelPolleres]

strong negation is like classical negation without "law of the excluded middle", not more, not less, actually this is a very simple concept.

16:11:19 [ChrisW]

csma: corretion, "supporting comments" was not moved, but accepted as a requirement

16:11:20 [Franc]

Chrisitian: since we moved many req to RIFRAF we would apply the RIFRAF to as many rule languages s we want RIF to cover.

16:11:45 [Franc]

Chrisitan: We will use RIFRAF to see what language go into RIF Pase 1, RIF Phase 2, etc.

16:11:59 [Franc]

Christian: Currently we have 5 of them Ilog, Lifg

16:12:04 [AxelPolleres]

DLV

16:12:07 [Franc]

s/lifg/life/

16:12:16 [Franc]

DVL, Xcerpt, Xchange, etc.

16:12:25 [AxelPolleres]

WRL

16:12:43 [Franc]

Chrisitan: we need a lot more rlue languages described for identify usefull, necessary, etc. features.