Prostitution Evaded for Pecuniary Tax Collated?

The definition of prostitution to the layman is “receiving monetary rewards for the engagement of sexual activity” thus rendering an illegal exchange of money for sex. But if one were to solicit a prostitute and pay her in drugs, is that illegal other then the fact that the drug itself illegal? Or how about food? If a hungry person solicits themselves in the exchange of food for sexual activity?

If you are a stickler then: Oxford Definition of prostitution – the practice or occupation of engaging in sexual activity with someone for payment.

Canadian Dictionary: Prostitution is the practice of exchanging sexual services for money or for other needs such as food and shelter (In Canada, Prostitution is not a crime, only the solicitation and communication thereof todo with prostitution, which is just a play of words because it is still illegal in the whole sense of the transactional agreement, solicitation in accordance to “sex” and the monetary exchange thereof.)

Merriam-Webster: Prostitution: the act or practice of engaging in promiscuous sexual relations especially for money. 2 : the state of being prostituted : debasement. (Which brings in the procurer (Pimp) element of the illicit endeavor.)

No matter how you slice the pie, it is illegal. So why can certain sites solicit sex over the internet? IE: A woman/girl and/or man/boy sits at home, on camera, hosted by an any number of so called legitimate membership hosting sites, and awaits someone to purchase a membership to enable them to purchase sexual activities based on the ongoing micro transactions made from the account depending on the customer’s/member’s requests of what sexual activity they want the female/male or both to perform, whom sits in a bedroom being procured (pimped) over the internet. This is not real modelling or acting because it is a real time performance not intended for distribution by policy of the site, this is sexual activity with penetration for money. Prostitution, not simulated.

Or if a woman/man and/or man/woman is paid to have sexual intercourse and/or foreplay/fellatio/cunnilingus/sodomy on camera to be sold to a wide variety of people to view over the internet or by means of electronic medium or another volatile or non-volatile data recording medium like DVD/Blu-ray, SD card, USB drive or removable drive. Although pornography is viewed as acting and is why it is legal for adults to purchase and view, it is still prostitution because they are having “real penetration and orgasms” during sex and is not simulated or acting. It is having sexual activity for money whereby usually all parties are being paid for performing sex onto each other. To watch someone murder a person on camera for real is illegal and considered not acting because the actual event is occurring, not simulated. Then why is pornography viewed as not prostitution if the actual act is not simulated but real? If this is legal then so should be prostitution on any level. Because if one was to hire a prostitute to have sex with them and filmed it for the intent of sale and distribution on a legal market as a production, then it would make any act of prostitution legal so long it was filmed on the intent to be distributed for legal sale.

This would make any “John”, the solicited, a potential producer/director/actor of a prostitution filmed and make any “Jane”, the prostitute an actress. Any lawyer, however incompetent could argue this case and win so long as the John/Jane encounter was filmed.

There has been a lot of upheaval in the underground markets for prostitution and it has certainly made many people paranoid. When Craniumslist decided to kill the personal section of their long-time bulletin board, it would seem they started a trend of fear. I have lost respect for that firm simply because they are not standing up for their First Amendment rights as a publisher. They really are offending the freedom symbol they use as part of their logo. Either way, they have just made my corporate hated list to be sure.

Freedom of the press: the right to publish newspapers, magazines, and other printed matter without governmental restriction and subject only to the laws of libel, obscenity, sedition, etc.

So instead of cleaning up the personals and enforce anyone that publishes an ad, to be responsible for their own publication by making them the publisher, through the terms of service, they could not be held liable and the Feds would have to chase after the individual offenders who become the publishers. But because of the push from special interest groups, lobbyists, and/or corporations pushing to eliminate the so called underground element on free personal ads, not to mention trying save money for the US Treasury, they create a blanket form of enforcement (FOSTA) that just tightens the noose on freedom of speech, creating a fear and panic that causes everyone, once again, to run back into the cloakroom and cling to the teacher’s dress.

In the area I live, the police and authorities have followed suit with raids and crack downs on the streets causing people that would advertise for the locals in a personal format, eliminate their ads, allowing large corporate sex sites to take over for fees of course. It is not very discreet when you have to register to a site that simply just wants your money via debit or credit card for information that should be free. In most cases it is just a con job that will string you along to spend more money in exchange for basically, nothing, not to mention make anyone that is stupid enough to join these pay sights susceptible to credit and identity theft. If they do not want money you will be spammed out by countless commercial and phishing emails. The best way to combat these marauders is to not patronise their money sucking hypocritical websites. They are the gatekeepers and the doorways to what and who is really controlling the sex trade, attempting to mold it into a totally virtual format. Virtual prostitution will make it even more secure, at the expense of your privacy and security, for sex pushing corporations to enslave participants to perform in virtual rooms who could be of any age really and no one would ever know how they were recruited and if they even get paid keeping them hooked and stoned on opiates. Human trafficking will skyrocket in the next decade to come, unless we educate and home school our children now before your child is the next enslaved victim via virtual sex room for virtual prostitution.