American conservative movements typically
look like the "pushmi-pullyu" creature in the Doctor
Dolittle children's stories illustrated above, with anarcho-libertarians
pulling against racial nationalists, and vice versa. Most white
American are confused about where to draw the line in defense
of both personal liberties and group ethnic-genetic
interests.(Photo found here)

Reconciling
Libertarianism
and Nationalism
To include thorny issues involved in reconciling
anarcho-libertarianism with racial nationalism.

by William B. Fox
Publisher, America First Books

First published June 2010.
Last re-edited and updated 3 August 2012

Can
we reconcile the anarcho-libertarian theory espoused by Lew
Rockwell (left photo), Dr. Thomas D. Lorenzo, Dr. Thomas Woods,
the late Dr. Murray Rothbard, and other intellectuals connected
with the Mises Institute with the white racial nationalist philosophy
espoused by the late Dr. William L. Pierce (right photo), late
Dr. Revilo Oliver, or currently by Willis Carto, Dr. David Duke
and Kevin Strom? ...To borrow an "Obama-ism"
-- YES WE CAN!

Third dimensional "z" axis entailing
"mutualism"
vs. "parasitism" not drawn, see online article.
These terms have a scientific meaning in sociobiology, but
for layman's purposes when applied to human affairs, "mutualism"
roughly corresponds to the "republican virtue,"
and "responsible citizenship" concepts advocated
by so-called American "Founding Fathers." It can
also involve the "value proposition" concept in
economics. The term "parasitism" roughly corresponds
to terms like "criminality," economic "rent-seeking,"
"subversion," and just about everything else that
is the opposite of "mutualism" An important reason
why America is in such deep trouble today is that the ratio
of people in American society -- particularly those at the
top -- who are engaged in "parasitism" as opposed
to "mutualism" has increased dramatically over the
last two hundred years. Please see my Reconciling
Opposing Political and Economic Ideologies series for
background on all these areas)

Decen-
tralized
(more
bottom
up)

My
Soap Box Message:

Libertarianism vs. Nationalism
Study Both, Reconcile Both!

The
chart above shows us how to reconcile both libertarianism and
nationalism. It lies in the "genetic bottom up" category
depicted in the lower right hand box, also known as "paleoconservatism,"
which combines both libertarianism and the "genetic
world view," a basis of nationalism. Paleoconservatism
was was in fact the ideology of most of the so-called "Founding
fathers" of the colonial governments, Articles of Confederation,
and even U.S. Constitution. They were against the dangers of
tyranny created by unlimited government, while at the same time
protective of their European racial and ethnic heritage.Please
seen my Reconciling
Opposing Political and Economic Ideologies series where
I explain not only ways to reconcile opposing viewpoints, but
also how the American "establishment" has transitioned
"diagonally" over the last two hundred years from
paleoconservatism in the lower right hand box to the "environmental
top down" or "neo-Jacobin" position in the upper
left hand box. Although
many politicians today still try to score "feel good"
political points by referencing select quotes from American
"Founding Fathers" -- implying a sense of legitimacy
and continuity that in fact no longer exists -- in actuality
their policies are usually ideologically the exact opposite.
America's trend in recent decades towards the use of torture,
the police state control grid, endless overseas imperial wars
for corporate special interests and Israel, pervasive government
interventionism at home, and forced race-mixing --are all ideologically
the opposite of what Thomas Jefferson and other framers of the
Declaration of Independence stood for.Much
of what passes for "libertarianism" today is in fact
"pseudo-libertarianism," where the power elite selectively
grants the masses "touchy feely" forms of "libertarianism"
in certain areas to create the illusion that they have "freedom"
within the overall system. After all, it is better to keep our
chains comfortable rather than make our oppression so obvious
so that too many people become rebellious. However, when it
comes to those local sovereignty issues that are the most threatening
to their control grid, they keep as many chips on their side
of the poker table as possible. For example, most white Americans
are freer today to indulge in XXX pornography, talk dirty in
public, and get state-funded abortions than they were a hundred
years ago. Not surprisingly, this form of decadent self-indulgence
is not particularly threatening to the power elite, so they
are happy to grant it as a concession to common people. However,
when it comes to the right of whites to openly form militias
as a counterpart to a highly centralized and Orwellian police
force and standing army, or to create their own local money
and banking system independent of the privately own Federal
Reserve System, or to organize themselves across all levels
of local society (to include in the work place and within their
own neighborhoods) by ethnicity to better protect grass roots
tribal interests, these forms of decentralized (and hence "libertarian")
power typically find themselves under increasing levels of harassment
as they become increasingly more visible and effective by the
federal agencies such as the DHS, IRS, ATF, and the FBI and
by Jewish organizations like the ADL, SPLC, and Mossad-CIA.
Please
also note my discussion of "Mutualism
vs. Parasitism." America has also transitioned from
being run by men with some semblance of honor to criminal gangs
of political whores and conspirators. See Chapter
5 and Chapter
35 of my Mission of Conscience series.According
to journalist-activist John de Nugent, the late John
"Birdman" Bryant provided an interesting analogy
to characterize a major social historical transition:

There
was a time when the white man was like the Big Dog in America,
and the blacks and Chinese and Jews seemed like yappy, harmless
little chihuahuas and terriers, full of their little demands
and commotion. But now the other dogs have grown much bigger,
and together they are getting bigger than the Big White Dog.
And the Big White Dog is getting nervous.

Actually
it is even worse than this. As I observe in other cases on this
web page, "Big Dog" has actually trained all the other
dogs how to bite him, to include gnawing on his hide through
the sophisticated use of "pseudo-libertarianism" as
disinformational propaganda.

The American Revolution was about libertarian decentralization
not only on a political level against the British Empire, but
also in many cases on a tactical military level. Col. Isaac
Shelby exhorted
militia before the Battle
of Kings Mountain: "When we encounter the enemy, don't
wait for a word of command. Let each of you be your own officer,
and do the best you can..." This battle became a major
patriot victory and turning point in the war. Shelby
went on to become the first and fifth Governor of the U.S. state
of Kentucky. Paradoxically, George Washington's Army went
in the opposite philosophical direction. (Artist
concept of Col. Isaac Shelby courtesy of Kings
Mountain National Military Park plaque).

Answering Two
Different But Related Fundamental Questions

It
is very important that we are consciously aware of the full
nature of this ideological conflict, because enemies who control
major national media frequently try to steer us to into false
paradigms in order to narrow our options, waste our time, create
blind spots, or confuse our priorities by inducing us to form
unnatural alliances and create unnatural enemies.
They can also render us fatalistic, passive, and ineffective.
Examples
of unnatural alliances might include racial integration or multi-cultural
working class unity against ones own racial and national survival.
Creating unnatural enemies might include destroying
the family by exacerbating conflict between men and women through
Marxist feminism. Truth
be told, people are naturally tribal. They have been this way
throughout their entire evolutionary history for millions of
years as hominids. People naturally tend to want to associate
with like-minded people who share their racial and ethnic background.
In addition, men and women naturally tend to fall in love, work
in harmony, have children, and foster family values. One
interesting way to compare libertarianism with nationalism is
to first ask what the fundamental social questions are that
each ideological approach is trying to solve. This reminds me
of a corporate law class I once took in business school, where
we were required to read state supreme court opinions for our
homework, and then we would be randomly called and graded by
our professor at the beginning of each to class to see who could
most concisely formulate the legal question that was being addressed.
If one does not first grasp an underlying "question,"
one certainly cannot begin to understand possible "answers."Let
me propose to you that a fundamental question that libertarians
raise is "how can I follow my own bliss" or maximize
individualized "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."A
fundamental question addressed by nationalists is "How
can I organize my own group (or people) to resist
degradation, economic exploitation, oppression, or even various
forms of genocide at the hand of an alien (or predatory or parasitic)
group."The
world looks like a very different place depending on which of
the two aforementioned "questions" dominates ones
thinking. However, there are some interesting "cross-over"
or "intersection" points where one question goes hand
in hand with the other.It
may be all well and good to "follow your own bliss,"
except what are you going to do when you are confronted with
an alien group out to enslave you or steal your property, and
you must organize with like-minded people to keep your enemies
at bay? How are you going to enjoy libertarian property rights
if everyone in your society starts becoming so short-sighted
and selfish that their ability to engaged in longer term production
planning, savings, and investment plummets, and there is no
longer very much real wealth to go around? How are you going
to enjoy "liberty" if the authorities who are supposed
to help protect your rights and property instead become so selfish
that they steal from you and promote tyranny? If you are not
wealthy enough to buy people off, or do not control a private
army, what else besides "reason" and "moral suasion"
can you use to protect yourself, your family, and your assets?
How can you cause people who are a position to take advantage
of you to refrain from doing exactly that? As
usual, long term success involves not only fostering incentives
for individuals, but also various forms of group cooperation.
Therefore, in a healthy society one typically requires various
forms of both "libertarianism" and "nationalism"
at the same time, rather than just one or the other..

One of the biggest problems with "libertarianism"
in America today is that many of its main advocates like Congressman
Ron Paul refuse to openly confront the racial and ethnic dimensions
behind Zionist power in America. The behavior of most leading
Zionists typically shows contempt for the U.S. Constitution
and genuine libertarian principles on an emotional as well as
intellectual level. Please see my extended discussion of Jewish
criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my online "Mutualism
vs. Parasitism" article. See also the Rev.
Ted Pike archive regarding nonstop Jewish ADL efforts to
destroy free speech.

Libertarianism
as a Two-Edged Sword:
Both as a Help and as a Decoy

Everywhere
one looks in American society today, one sees strenuous efforts
by well-funded media leaders to steer dissent against the establishment
towards anarcho-libertarianism as a preferred form of "controlled
opposition" compared to paleoconservatism. Anarcho-libertarianism
is a very sanitized view of the world that dismisses ethnic
and racial factors and instead thinks that human nature can
be changed solely through reason and education. Anarcho-libertarianism
is a least bad form of dissent from the Jewish standpoint because
it takes the focus off their alien
racial characteristics. Media
pundits often smear paleoconservatives by implying that they
are secretly "genetic top down" authoritarian Nazis
of the worst sort, every bit as abusive as Zionists who have
imposed the police state control grid over Christian and Muslim
Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.Interestingly
enough, I even see this steering conducted by many libertarians
who I otherwise admire, such as Alex Jones, Dr. Ron Paul, and
Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo.While
Alex Jones admits that humans are tribal by nature, he also
states that they should broaden their tribal instincts to include
people of many different racial and ethnic backgrounds. In my
"Handling Real Nazis" section of Chapter
34, I explain how this kind of thinking has failed to provide
a clear line in the sand for White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP)
America, which has declined from the majority down to just another
minority. This in turn has fostered a reversal on a deep demographic
and sociological basis of both the American Revolution and Protestant
Reformation, which both took place among majority Nordic populations.
WASP America has become too weak to not only resist Zionist
takeover, but also the tidal waves of Third World illegal alien
immigration that will cause whites to become a minority in twenty
years, and is reducing America down to a Third World level of
social and economic efficiency. In
Chapter
29 of my Mission of Conscience Trilogy, I explain
how Ron Paul is off base when he associates "racism"
with "collectivism." This is one of many reasons why
I view Dr. Paul's ideology as "necessary but not sufficient"
due to its blind spots in handling racial and ethnic issues.In
many of his Mises Institute lectures, Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo associates
"nationalism" with Henry Clay's "American System"
of the 19th century, which pushed for increased government protectionism,
interventionism, and regulation. This ignores the anti-Federalist
side of early American nationalism which opposed all these things.
Please see my discussion of the history of American nationalism
in Appendix
IV of my Iceland series.Nationalists
are not perfect either. Some self-styled "nationalists"
are so obsessed with racial and ethnic conflict that they spend
no time at all studying basic economic issues. Short
term greed for low cost alien labor is a major reason for how
racial conflicts got imported into America in the first place.
That is what brought in blacks as slaves in the 18th and 19th
centuries, and the Irish Catholics as low cost industrial labor
in the mid 19th century --the first major white group to dilute
the former overwhelming WASP majority. Greed also brought in
some of the worst white trash among Europe's lower classes in
the form of indentured servants. (See They
Were White and They Were Slaves by Michael A Hoffman
II). Nationalists
need to be able to speak the economic language of American businessmen
in order to show them how it is in their long term best interest
to follow nationalist policies. I provide some examples of ways
to apply nationalist principles to economic policy areas in
Part
4 and Appendix
IV of my Iceland
country analysis. Nationalists
also need to understand the character of their own racial and
ethnic groups better. All other things being held equal, I have
observed that fellow Scandinavian-Americans have a much harder
time organizing themselves to fund mutually beneficial political
causes and to further each other's economic interests than Jews,
particularly in major urban environments. Their individualism
can be an asset when it comes to technological innovation and
formulating political dissent, but when it comes to assembling
political machines, waging counter covert 4th generation warfare,
and outguessing alien mafia operations (see Chapter
38 of my Trilogy for my discussion of 4th generation warfare),
Nordic-style "chivalrous individualism" can be more
of a handicap than an asset. There
are other blind spots that I repeatedly observe among certain
nationalists. For example, many nationalists who focus on the
high rate of black on white crime ignore the fact that many
whites suffer from the "The Man Who Would Be King"
syndrome, as discussed in my Environmental
vs. Genetics article. They are easily seduced by hard-up
nonwhites who look up at them with doggy eyes and want whites
to be their all-wise, all-noble, surrogate "re-distributor
chiefs." They also refuse to look at deeper religious and
political reasons for their misplaced altruism, as addressed
by William Gayley Simpson in Which Way Western Man?
(Please see my home
page for Simpson). They lack a tribal political and religious
ideology that motivates their business leaders to place long
term white ethnic genetic interests ahead of scoring quick profits
by importing cheap alien labor or outsourcing skilled jobs and
strategic industries overseas. They practice a form of "country
club" Right Wing where they like to privately cast aspersions
on the latest outrages committed by blacks, Jews, and other
alien groups, rather confront these groups out in the open and
implement deeply felt nationalist policies that can effectively
preserve the racial and cultural character of their entire society.
In other words, taking a few verbal pot shots at Jews is simply
a status symbol, like a copy of Cigar
Aficianado on the coffee table or the pictures of golf
greens on the office walls. See "The
Radicalizing of an American" by the late Dr. William
Pierce for more discussion of "Caspar
Milquetoast" Yuppie-type "conservatives"
in our midst.Many
American nationalists also do not want to deal with the way
in which many longstanding Old World problems have simply refused
to go away in America, but instead lay festering just beneath
the surface, such as the greater authoritarian tendencies of
Catholic groups compared to WASPs, and the way Catholics have
tended to swing back and forth politically between WASPs and
Jews in America similar to the way mulattos and mestizos
swing back and forth between whites and blacks or whites and
Indians respectively in Latin American politics. Catholic "swinging"
behavior was a huge problem in English, French, German, Dutch,
and Scottish history in the 16th to 18th centuries --contributing
to some extremely bloody religious wars -- but most Americans
do not even know their own history, much less European history.
See my "Handling Real Nazis" discussion in Chapter
34 of my Trilogy for more background on this important yet
widely neglected issue in America today.All
of this leads to a final point. Today Catholics are as numerous
as Protestants, Jews are clearly in control of many major strategic
bases of American society (for example see The
High Priests of War about how they have run the Pentagon,
and the New
Jerusalem about how they run major American media),
and nonwhite birth rates will exceed white birth rates in a
few years. America has become a conglomeration of so many different
groups with such extremely conflicting innate values that it
has become a huge sociological train wreck. I
am still wrestling with ways to interpret Catholics as a group
in America, not to mention Protestants. (Christian Zionist John
Hagee is a prime example of an embarrassment to Protestant America,
as explained in Chapter
21 in my Mission of Conscience series. See also
the August 2008 American Free Press article “`The
Cult of the Corpulent Man’" by Michael Collins
Piper). In Europe Catholic groups come in many different gradations
of political attitudes, often more related to their anthropological
background than their "official religion" of "Catholicism."
For example, Ireland is a mixture of Nordic, Celtic, Alpine,
"Mediterranean," and perhaps even some residual Neanderthal
stocks. (I put "Mediterranean" in quotes because what
is considered "Mediterranean" today is very different
--often for the worse-- than what racial historians consider
"Mediterranean" two thousand years ago. The same applies
to the term "German," which today connotes more of
an "Alpine" background with leanings towards an earthy
mentality, stodginess, and authoritarianism than anything "Nordic",
whereas two thousand years ago "Germanic" was virtually
synonymous with "Nordic" with leanings towards chivalrous
behavior, light-heartedness, adventurousness, creativity, and
individualism). The more Nordic side of Irish Catholics is often
called "Lace Curtain Irish," whereas the more Neanderthal
and "Mediterranean" side is called "Shanty Irish"
and "Dark Irish." Quite a few Lace Curtain Irish Catholics
have publicly excoriated shanty Irish Catholics as 'The niggers
of western Europe." Similarly, French Catholics are more
Nordic in the Normandy and Celtic in the Brittany areas, and
they have historically demonstrated very different social and
political attitudes compared to "Mediterranean" French
Catholics in southern France. At various points in French history,
the French government in Paris has not only broken from the
Vatican, but has even allied itself with Protestant armies against
other Catholics. Italian Catholics are more Nordic and Celtic
in northern Italy, and quite a few of them totally despise Italian
Catholics south of Rome (there are even nationalist movements
in northern Italy that would like to secede and break Italy
in two). Many southern Italians show some residual Negro DNA
from prior slave periods of the Roman Empire (such as black
curly hair). Some northern Italian Catholics refer to certain
Sicilians as "Arabs who speak Italian" and spit when
they speak. They also show complete contempt for certain southern
Italian communities who can never quite pull themselves together
enough on a sociological level to rid themselves of very serious
mafia infestation problems.Not
surprisingly, given my own WASP background, rather than call
myself "anti-Catholic," it may be more accurate to
say that my own social and political attitudes more closely
approximate those of Lace Curtain Irish Catholics towards certain
shanty Irish Catholics, and Norman and Celtic French Catholics
towards certain southern French Catholics, and Northern Italian
Catholics towards certain southern Italian Catholics. Some
American nationalists such as Tom Chittum prophesied that this
Great America Empire -- or what I view as the "Orwellian,
Zionist-dominated, multi-racial, multi-cultural, neo-Jacobin
welfare-warfare global super state that wages perpetual war
for perpetual peace" -- can only eventually come apart
at the seams. Please see my Publisher's
Preface to the 2007 ebook edition of Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America and the Tom
Chittum author archive web
page. My
own personal thinking on these issues is probably further to
the right than the majority of American nationalists today,
especially after having closely observed fellow Scandinavian-Americans
within the context of many ethnic organizations. I have come
to the conclusion that the sociological conditions that people
have lived under for the last ten thousand years of their evolutionary
experience are a good clue regarding what offers optimal social
stability and productivity for them today. (This is similar
to the paleo-diet concept
which rejects process foods with chemical additives for more
more natural foods). Nordic peoples have peculiar psychological
traits which cause them to function best over the long run in
relatively small homogenous countries like Norway, Sweden, or
Iceland in which they can preserve an indigenous Nordic folk
culture and religion. The
original melting pot idea in America had to do with bringing
together closely related Nordic or Nordic-Celtic peoples who
existed in large pockets in England, Scotland, France, the Netherlands,
northern Germany, northern Poland, as well as through out Scandinavia.
This made some anthropological sense since they were closely
related on a biological level and had similar instinctive values.However,
the melting pot concept that evolved by the late 19th century,
involved melding peoples from nationalities all over Europe
in order to quickly populate the North American continent and
build a global super power. This power-mad, imperialistic version
of the melting pot fostered by the same government that had
smashed States' Rights during Abe Lincoln's War and elevated
Negroes over whites in many Southern Reconstruction legislatures
became a totally different animal compared to the original concept.
In fact, this latter version has been a long term sociological
disaster for Nordic peoples not only in America, but around
the world, particularly in the 20th century. This is a major
reason why Nordics have been in steady demographic decline since
the mid 19th century in America. See Part IV "What
Nationalist Principles Might Have Defended Iceland"
and Part 5 "What
Must We Do" in my Iceland series. Incidentally,
I would say the same thing for other closely related northern
European peoples, such as Scottish Americans and the Scots-Irish
described in James Webb's book Born
Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America. I feel
that we have to rehabilitate the same kind of "folk consciousness"
and social fabric among northern European groups that once existed
among 19th century immigrant communities in America before America
will begin to "work" again. Please see my "Critical
Issues" discussion regarding economic vital signs which
show that America does not work anymore, a sentiment
also echoed by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts (depicted below) in his
"sign off" article "Truth
Has Fallen and Taken Liberty With It." For another
perspective on indigenous Northern European ethnic traits and
political realities in America today, please see Appendix
B of my Oslo-Utoya
7-22 web page).

A January 2009 scene from the "Pots
and Pans Revolution" in Iceland, a land with longstanding
libertarian traditions. Over the long run, nationalist policies
are necessary to protect Icelandic libertarian traditions as
well as to help keep Iceland Icelandic.

Specific
avenues to reconcile
libertarianism and nationalism

This
is certainly a very broad and deep topic, worthy of innumerable
papers and books. This is also an area where we would certainly
appreciate donations
to continue our research and analytical work.Suffice
for our purposes here, I will provide a few examples of commonality:

In
his book On Liberty, Dr. Murray Rothbard claims that
private property rights are the cornerstone of libertarian theory.
An important aspect of real property rights is "quiet enjoyment,"
that is, the ability of someone to make use of ones own property
without obnoxious encumbrances and interferences. Dr. Rothbard
also explains how the preservation of "group property"
rights can be every bit as important as "individual property."
(See my discussion of group vs. individual property concepts
in Appendix
II of my Iceland series, and how we should not necessarily
confuse the "group property" concept with "collectivism.").
Lastly, libertarians understand the need to protect the rights
of intangible intellectual property such as patents and trademarks.Frequently
Mises Institute lecturers talk about how the most fundamental
property right of a libertarian is the right to own his own
body and the labor produced by his body.In
racial nationalism, ones own gene pool becomes an "extended
body" and hence a tangible group property right. Ones indigenous
culture becomes an intangible group intellectual property right
that emanates from this "extended body." Group homogeneity,
cohesion, and territoriality are prerequisites for quiet enjoyment
of both ones real genetic and intangible cultural assets. Another
vital libertarian principle involves the First Amendment right
of free speech and peaceable assembly. In fact, I have spoken
with organized labor leaders in America who have pointed out
to me that right of free assembly and free speech is the cornerstone
of their right to create worker unions.Whereas
unions typically organize to protect economic interests, "nationalism"
typically means organizing to protect the most vital interests
of all for a group of people, which can include not only vital
economic interests, but also political, religious, cultural,
territorial, and ethnic-genetic interests as well (see my discussion
of ethnic-genetic interests in Appendix
VI of my Iceland article). Labor
unions are typically prepared to go on strike to defend
economic interests. Nationalists are often prepared to got to
war, fight, and even die for "ultimate
interests." See the article "Why
Nations Fight- America is losing, without a struggle, the very
thing that nations have always fought to protect" by
William Robertson Boggs, Jan
1991, American Renaissance.In
the long run, nationalism and libertarianism can and should
complement and reinforce each other. On an analytical level,
anarcho-libertarians typically focus on factional or class conflict,
whereas racial nationalists focus on tribal or racial conflict.
Anarcho-libertarians also often focus on cash flow in their
economic analysis, whereas racial nationalist tend to focus
on "gene
flow" (a key concept in the academic disciplines of
medical
anthropology and population
genetics) as part of a broader and more long term social
analysis. All of these things are part of reality.
Often they overlap; it is possible to apply various types of
libertarian free market and entrepreneurial business models
towards understanding "gene flow" as well as "cash
flow" (the creation of "class structures" and
"national borders" might be interpreted as the genetic
and territorial protection of "comparative advantage,"
"group" or "corporate" property, and "key
success factors," to use business terminology). As another
example, class structures in Latin America often overlap white,
mestizo, Indian, mulatto, and Negro racial divides. In addition,
where there is libertarian "smoke," there is often
racial nationalist "fire" taking place at some level
of society. When various "tribal groups" within society
tracked by racial nationalists make power grabs, they typically
leave "special privilege" foot prints that also start
to show up on the radar screens of libertarians. For example,
the rise of authoritarian federalism in America roughly corresponds
with the decline in WASPs in America as a percentage of the
total white population, as well as their declining power in
such strategic bases as media and banking. As another example,
the financial coup de etat that took place with the establishment
of the Federal Reserve Banking system in 1913, combined with
the creation of the income tax, could only have been accomplished
by Rothschild confederates such as the Rockefellers, Warburgs,
and Morgans with extreme covert Jewish tribal loyalty. In Chapter
38 of my Trilogy, I explain how high level Jewish
operations typically often qualify as a permanent form of covert
4th generation warfare, making them the "Mongols of High
Finance."Libertarian
analysis, when done properly, should complement and help confirm
racial nationalist analysis, just like the way both sides of
chemistry and physics equations should balance out total matter
and energy. Libertarian
and nationalist analysis can also complement each other on a
policy level. For example, the libertarian author Dr. Hans Hermann-Hoppe
(cited below) has observed that over the long run, countries
that run libertarian free market systems with plenty
of room for entrepreneurship typically have much stronger national
economies. This can in turn can support much more technologically
advanced and more potent war machines than societies like the
former Soviet Union which try to function as a permanent authoritarian
garrison states. Countries that stay too authoritarian for too
long may lose the very thing that they are most focused on perpetrating
--military power. Security establishments that impose authoritarianism
on libertarian societies for too long, such as the longstanding
way Mossad-CIA and private international banking cartels have
exercised a stranglehold on American media and America's political
processes (see Chapter
33 about private banking cartels and Chapter
35 about Obama as a Mossad-CIA asset in my Trilogy),
may ultimately discover that they have cut their own throats
by parasitically undermining the very economic base that originally
kept them in operation.Regarding
racial nationalism and libertarianism, there is a strong element
of "libertarianism" in the DNA of certain European
populations, with the greatest concentrations in Nordic peoples,
as explained in Appendix
I and Appendix
IV of my Iceland series. In Chapter
III: The Nordic North of Racial
Realities in Europe, Dr. Lothrop Stoddard stated
clearly that he believed that only Nordics have demonstrated
the capability to maintain viable republican and parliamentary
systems for any extended period. An important reason why America
is turning into a police state is the fact that over the last
one hundred and fifty years, the Nordic or Nordic-Celtic percentage
of the white population has declined from over 60% to less than
20%, while at the same time getting usurped in power centers
by innately criminal Jews and innately authoritarian Catholic-Alpine
peoples. One
rough rule of thumb for Nordic decline can be found in the reduction
in the number of people with blue eyes, since this is a recessive
genetic characteristic commonly found among Nordics that quickly
becomes submerged when they interbreed with other peoples. According
to the Wikipedia article on eye
color:

A 2002 study found that the prevalence of blue eye color
among Caucasians in the United States to be 33.8 percent for
those born from 1936 through 1951 compared with 57.4 percent
for those born from 1899 through 1905. Blue eyes have become
increasingly rare among American children, with only one out
of every six or 16.6%, which is 49.8 million out of 300 million
(22.4% of white Americans) of the total United States population
having blue eyes. The plunge in the past few decades has taken
place at a remarkable rate. A century ago, 80 percent of people
married within their ethnic group. Blue eyes were routinely
passed down, especially among people of Western and Northern
European ancestry.

To
maintain genuinely libertarian social and political institutions,
Nordic countries have to maintain the Nordic integrity of their
gene pools. They also have to maintain Nordic control of the
strategic bases of their societies, such as media, banking,
military, government, religion. A strong libertarian-populist
movement in Nordic countries can serve as a watchdog against
high level Zionist infiltration and corruption, such as the
"Pots and Pans Revolution" in Iceland that exposed
many high level malefactors. In addition, by maintaining a Nordic
leadership elite that shares the same ethnicity as the working
class, it is more likely that the leaders will have a long term
sense of stakeholdership and will have more vision and discipline
about bringing into fruition long term industrial development
plans that benefit society as a whole, rather than engaging
in speculative financial operations that risk looting the country
for the benefit of the power elite only. Last,
but not least, it is helpful to use a long term historical "case
study" approach in comparing libertarianism and nationalism.
(See Chapter
38 for the section about the "case study" and
"constraint analysis" methods). We can endlessly debate
back and forth between the two viewpoints, and create thousands
of theoretical models, but ultimately we have to ask what has
really worked in the real world. After all, human nature does
not change, even though new technology may magnify the power
and influence of some groups in society relative to others,
and modern propaganda techniques may improve the ability of
cabals to mask evil motives. Realistically
speaking, I see only three basic social structures and outcomes
for trying to achieve "libertarianism" that emerge
from history books. I invite the reader to keep these three
options in the back of his mind as he reads through the rest
of this article and consider how they fit my discussion of different
sides of libertarianism and nationalism. What I have below is
not exactly what they teach in our federalized education system,
but that should not stop us from forming our own ideas: a)
Form or maintain homogeneous Nordic or Nordic-Celtic nations.
They seem to be the only societies with a long term track record
of successfully institutionalizing libertarian values. The peoples
of northern Europe are among the very few peoples on this planet
with a proven historical track record of advancing rational
government and the growth of increasingly productive industry.
They also have a knack for developing and maintaining a relatively
large middle class. They can indirectly supporting libertarianism
everywhere else in the world by serving as role models or by
providing foreign aid and advisement support. In North America,
the creation of such ethnostates implies secessionism in parts
of the U.S. and Canada. b)
In a multi-racial society, sift out the Nordic or Nordic-Celtic
elements as a separate class, essentially forming a "nation
within a nation" that can function as a self-sustaining
social unit. This will help prevent this element from losing
more power and influence or simply melting away --and in particular
being infiltrated and usurped by Zionist mafias and their corrupt
gentile collaborators. It should help set a libertarian tone
for the overall society, given its historical track record.Things
will never be perfectly "libertarian" for the other
classes, but then again, it is never fun to be a minority, separate
class, or underclass in any society. However, this
situation could be the least bad option for many nonwhites and
even Jews. The trade off is that most other classes or racial
groups in history have been incapable of maintaining industrial
growth and steady improvement in living standards. Zionists
are notorious for lying, looting, and creating highly manipulative
and paranoid "control freak" environments. The black
rulers of most black African countries have generally been more
cruel, corrupt, dictatorial, and oppressive than their white
colonial predecessors. Just ask blacks in Zimbabwe who have
watched their country fall apart ever since whites lost power.
The same has happened in South Africa. This has in fact been
the case in most other African countries. Just take a look at
"A
Vice Guide to Liberia," (to include the part about
"Gen. Butt Naked" and the trip to "West Point")
a VBS.TV documentary about a "model society" created
in Africa by the United States in the 19th century. c)
Continue going full throttle with the so-called egalitarian
society in America with forced integration, open borders, and
affirmative action reverse discrimination. This approach has
in fact achieved the exact opposite of its stated goals. What
we are really experiencing is an extremely hypocritical society,
where Zionists have risen to the top, the white middle class
continues to shrink, living standards decline, and the overall
society marches towards police state lock down...and even worse.
Ironically, while pursuing a phony form of libertarianism promoted
by Zionists, this approach has helped destroy much of the very
Nordic and Nordic-Celtic genetic stock that has given rise to
the most successful libertarian societies in history. In
a multiracial society, the alternative to not having an open
and honest class system, as discussed in b) above is usually
to have a secret class system which can be vastly more
dangerous since it tends to be run by nasty intelligence services
and criminals skilled at running clandestine operations. Open
and honest ruling classes may become pompous and suffer from
other defects, but they are vastly easier to track than covert
mafias or intelligence service operators. I personally am not
much more fond of them than Thomas Jefferson, but realistically,
in a multi-racial society they might be the least bad option.
Are
you enjoying your false
flag pandemic vaccination toxins, U.N. Agenda 21 global
depopulation plan, and police state control grid quietly
being implemented around you by your secret ruling class? (See
Alex Jones below). In Chapter
5 I explain how America's current secret ruling elite holds
a tropism for "oligarchical collectivism" and "Asiatic
despotism." They tend to create and maintain pyramidal
societies, where swarming masses at the bottom live in continuous
fear, humiliation, poverty, and degradation.If
I am correct that a) to c) comprise the only realistic options
proven by history, this definitely "frames the debate"
when it comes to further discussion about libertarianism vs.
nationalism, and how all of this impacts on professed values
and social structures.

AMERICAN
LIBERTARIAN THINKERS
AND MEDIA LEADERS

I
have some good news and bad news regarding anarcho libertarian
writers like Lew Rockwell, Dr. Murray Rothbard, and Ron Paul.
The good news is that they provide a wealth of facts and powerful
insights for free over the Internet. The
bad news, from a hard core paleoconservative viewpoint, is that
they all comprise a form of "limited hangout" and
"controlled opposition" (less politely stated, they
lie by omission). Among other things, they are not going to
come out completely out in the open and give you the straight
scoop on Mossad-CIA
false flag terror, Jewish Neanderthalism,
Jewish supremacism, Jewish criminal
totalitarian psychopathology, WASP
dispossession, and anti-Nordic
genocide in America. After all, they are anarcho-libertarians,
so "rational theoretical models," not DNA, is what
really matters most to these people. In addition, the Mises
Institute is funded and staffed by a lot of Jews and Catholics
who want to beat their chests and jump up and down and wave
their arms and appear to be just as "libertarian"
as WASPs.Still,
you can't beat a free lunch, especially if you can keep the
right "plug variables" in the back of your mind to
"fill in the gaps" where they lie by omission. I personally
spend about half my time listening to and reading libertarians,
and the other half listening to and reading racial nationalists.
One side helps to give a "mental break" and some variety
from the other side. Out
of control government, and the negative sides of central planning,
are all certainly important issues that they cover very well,
even though these are not the only critical issues.
Also, it is very significant that many anarcho-libertarians
today are just beginning to cover stories that individuals in
the paleoconservative section were covering more than two decades
ago. For example, Pat Buchanan's recent books The Death
of the West and The Unnecessary War is bringing
forth information that was being covered by people like Willis
Carto and the late Dr. William Pierce in the 1970's. Alex Jones
has been following Bilderberg conferences in the last decade,
but Willis Carto and Jim Tucker at the American Free Press
have been following these conferences for over thirty years.

Dr.
Paul Craig Roberts: Often called "the Father
of Reaganomics," he was once a former high level insider
(see bio)
during the Reagan administration. Dr. Roberts has since
done excellent work in documenting economic policies that
have eroded America's industrial base. He has also covered
America's transition towards the police state. For "mainstream
moderates" who read Fortune, Forbes, The
Wall Street Journal and other "mainstream media,"
Dr. Roberts' discussions of economic issues provide an excellent
introduction point to prepare people for more radical thinkers
like Dr. Murray Rothbard and Dr. Hans Hermann-Hoppe below
--or even Dr. William Pierce.Dr.
Robert's 24 March 2010 "sign off" article "Truth
Has Fallen and Has Taken Liberty With It" got a
lot of people feeling depressed, but I am more optimistic.
Having been both a real estate and stock broker and repeatedly
seen both individual businesses and overall markets go through
extreme cycles -where often the coldest part of the night
is an hour before dawn -- I am impressed with the cyclical
nature of just about everything, to include "imperial
cycles" on a macro-political and historical level.
Eventually there will be a new dawn. Nation-states will
some day form out of the U.S. rubble (just like they formed
out of the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia) and sanity
and healthy nationalism will some day return to North America.
Many
anarcho-libertarians probably should feel depressed, because
their view of the world is so limited that they keep beating
their heads against a wall, expecting people to be "reasonable"
in areas where most of the time they are really ruled by
emotion and instinct. They also act as if longstanding anti-Nordic
genocide in America does not matter, when in fact it really
does. One
argument for the creation and maintenance of smaller countries
(or the return of serious "State's Rights" in
America) is the fact that in even in a "democracy"
with a "free press," large segments of the population
have problems intelligently and decisively responding to
sophisticated threats like Zionist "Info
War" (to include "false flag" operations)
and they need their own territory, folk culture, and nation
state as "training wheels" to help preserve their
long term ethnic-genetic interests. Living
in a pluralist, imperial society where nobody cares any
more about protecting their ethnic-genetic interests and
core indigenous values seems to create an even worse problem,
namely everybody becomes too fractured, selfish, and amoral
to prevent the most psychopathic mafias (like Zionists)
and individuals (Bill Clinton and George W. Bush) from rising
to the top. It happened in the ancient Roman and Babylonian
empires, and it has happened here in America as well. Most
people seem to prefer to go about their daily lives unconcerned
about macro social and political issues even when faced
with terrible dangers, although admittedly some racial and
ethnic groups (like
Icelanders) seem to be more effective at intelligent
grass roots democratic action than others.Links:
In 2012 Dr. Roberts launched his official homepagepaulcraigroberts.org.
Prior to this, many fans relied on the
articles archive at vdare.com; archive
at lewrockwell.com. More recent articles than the "sign
off" article archived
at Globalresearch.ca, include June 2, 2010 article: "A
Plague Upon The World: The USA is a `Failed State Interview
with Dr. Paul Craig Roberts." Dr. Robert's articles
archive at Vdare.com now has the 31 July 2010 article
"Let
Them Eat Cake," and his 26 July 2010 article "The
Year America Dissolved." Welcome
back, Dr. Roberts.

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

Dr.
Murray Rothbard: A Jewish renegade who was rejected
from Ayn Rand's atheistic Jewish inner circle in Manhattan
because he married a Christian wife, Murray Rothbard once
quipped "All
stereotypes are true." Dr. Rothbard did considerable
work resurrecting Old Right paleoconservatism, although he
filtered much of it from a Jewish-friendly, anarcho-libertarian
perspective. Dr.
Rothbard produced iconoclastic histories such as The Great
Depression, which showed how the Federal Reserve created
the very economic malaise it was allegedly designed to avoid.
His article "Generalissimo
Washington: How He Crushed the Spirit of Liberty"
dovetails nicely with my discussion of Dr. Thomas Woods and
the relationship of George Washington vs. the anti-Federalists
below.Rothbard's
Conceived in Liberty underscores what he considered
to be a defining aspect of the "American experience,"
namely that during the colonial era, settlers in places like
Pennsylvania grew in population to the size of many small
European states, yet they got along perfectly well managing
their own affairs at a local level without hardly any central
government by European standards. In fact, without the overhang
of various classes of political and religious "rent-seekers,"
they discovered that they were much happier and more prosperous.
What
Murray Rothbard does not mention is that many of these colonists,
to include English Puritans in New England, Dutch in New York,
German Lutherans in Pennsylvania, and Scots-Irish on the frontier,
retained a quaint European folk culture and other forms of
social fabric that fostered moral order on the local level.
In addition, many of them consisted of Nordic and closely
related Celtic peoples who had already manifested libertarian
instinctive tendencies and self-sufficiency back in the Old
Country. See, for example, my discussion of Iceland
as a model libertarian society during the medieval period.
Rothbard
provided many valuable libertarian analyses regarding labor
markets. He argued that the major force for driving up wages
over the long run in a society is the ability of entrepreneurial
businesses to increase productivity and offer better products,
which in turn gives them an incentive to raise wages to attract
better people. This complements the view of Eumonn Fingleton
in In
Praise of Hard Industries: Why Manufacturing, Not the Information
Economy, Is the key to Future Prosperity, namely
that only the manufacturing sector has the ability to infinitely
scale up productivity and wages over the long run, not the
service sector. In contrast, unions that focus simply on increasing
benefits for themselves regardless of productivity gains wind
up killing the golden geese that lay the golden eggs.Rothbard
also pointed out many interesting historical anomalies in
his lectures. For example, he claims that many colleagues
at Columbia University originally started out with an extremely
socialistic, pro-union orientation. After extensive studies
of union-related economic statistics, they concluded that
unions tend to "throw sand in the gears of change."
They can also foment a "war of the working class against
the working class" by driving up wages for those fortunate
enough to belong to unions, while at the same time increasing
unemployment among those outside the union structure. Higher
wage scales may force certain employers to hire fewer workers
overall. Rothbard also observed that the main forces behind
the creation of the South African apartheid system were not
"right wing" racist Afrikaners, but white socialist
or communist unionists --many of whom were British-- who wanted
to prevent blacks from taking their jobs. (Interestingly enough,
the article "Denis Kearney and the Struggle for a White
America" on page 192 of Best of Attack! --also
mentioned with a PDF link in the Kevin Strom section below
-- claims that the main force that ejected Asians from California
in the late 19th century to keep California mostly white were
labor unions and not racist organizations like the Ku Klux
Klan). Last, but not least, Rothbard maintained that the "dirty
little secret" of organized labor success in Northern
states compared to the South was the tendency of northern
policemen to look the other way when unions used violence
to enforce strikes, whereas Southern policemen tended to be
much more sympathetic towards enforcing the so-called "right
to work" of strike breakers. (An article in Forbes
magazine also noted another irony along this line; namely
that because unions have been exempted from anti-trust and
other anti-monopoly laws, certain corrupt unions abuse their
control of the supply of labor with all the monopolistic arrogance
of the "robber baron" corporate interests that they
oppose).It
is worth noting that politics makes strange bedfellows in
other ways. While it is true that Communists and Nationalists
are usually at each other's throats, there have been unusual
historical situations where they have been closer on certain
issues than so-called "moderates." For example,
in the 1990's Russian communists and nationalists were closer
in openly opposing Zionist oligarchs than many so-called Russian
"moderates." There is also an interesting photo
in Adolf
Hitler
by John Toland showing Communist and Nazi flags mixed
together hanging out of apartment windows during a 1920's
renter's strike in Germany. Lastly, in the 1960's, American
old Right libertarian nationalists (paleoconservatives) were
just as opposed to America's interventionism in Vietnam as
the far Left, albeit for different rhetorical and ideological
reasons, using code words like disdain for "foreign entanglements,"
"large standing armies," and "self-aggrandizing
government as a threat to personal liberty" rather than
"imperialism," "oppression of the masses,"
and "racism"Having
had some personal experience working with unions, I do not
want to knock them too hard here. In fact, on a broad theoretical
level they are consistent with many of my pro-nationalist
views, namely the right of people to organize themselves to
protect their own vital interests. (The right of peaceable
assembly is a First Amendment right, incidentally, along with
freedom of speech and freedom of the press). Unions can be
extremely effective in handling abusive employers --of whom
there are many -- and in defending vital political and economic
interests. Unions can also function like "craft guilds"
that help improve quality standards and professionalism. Often
it is hard to measure union success in these areas, since
they deter employer abuse and can help improve intangible
quality standards. Many of the AFL-CIO-affiliated union local
leaders I had personal contact with in the State of Washington
were conscious of the need to keep benefit increases in line
with productivity gains. There are also many unions involving
teachers, policemen, and other public servants who uphold
high professional standards. In
my view, America needs even more grass roots organizing
to defend both political and economic interests, not less,
so long as these things are done in an intelligent manner.I
view the ability to go on worker's strike as a "weapon,"
analogous on an abstract sociological level to carrying a
firearm with a concealed carry permit on a physical level.
While I believe that Americans should be as "armed"
as possible on the grass roots level to protect individual
liberty against centralized tyranny, they should also be very
careful about how they "brandish" their "weapons"
in public. Even members of the most hard-core pro-gun ownership
groups will agree with me that under certain circumstances,
brandishing a concealed weapon in public can constitute a
form of terroristic threatening and hence constitute a criminal
offense, and the same applies for brandishing the more abstract
threat of a worker's strike. Strikes can generate a lot of
bitterness between workers and management, and scare away
the very entrepreneurial environment that is required to create
the innovative businesses and capital investment required
to drive up real wage growth over the long run. Dr.
Murray Rothbard is one of the very few relatively honest Jews
I can respect and admire. If more Jews were like him, we probably
would not have so many problems.Links:Rothbard
File at LewRockwell.com, articles
archive at Mises.org. Online
literatureat Mises.org includes classics such
as Conceived in Liberty (PDF), On Liberty,
What Has Government
Done to Our Money?, and The Great Depression.
Mises
Institute
MP3 Archive include discussion of union economics,
Austrian theory of business cycle.

Dr. Murray Rothbard
(1926-1995)

Lew
Rockwell, President of the Mises Institute, has been
a very effective popularizer of the libertarian insights of
the founders of the Austrian School of economics created by
Karl Menger (a gentile) and later redacted by Ludwig von Mises
(a Jew) and Murray Rothbard (a Jew). Rockwell's works are
pithy and to the point for American readers who may lack the
time and inclination for Dr. Rothbard's more academic approach.Considering
how American conservatism was completely knocked down for
the count by decades of brainwashing from leftist, pro-big
government and pro-central bank Jewish controlled national
media by the early 1990's, and how the Internet Revolution
still lay beyond the horizon, Lew Rockwell's decision during
this period to simply focus on the libertarian side and pay
enough lip service to Jewish redactors to get major Jewish
funding was probably a shrewd, practical, and disciplined
decision given the realities at the time. It was hard enough
to reach a mass audience with either a coherent libertarian
or a racial nationalist message, and probably even more difficult
to do both simultaneously. It seems like only Zionist neocons
and Jewish pressure organizations like the ADL and SPLC had
lots of money. Most everybody else was starving.Without
question there are quite a few areas where Rockwell and his
libertarian colleagues hit home runs. One clear area involves
explaining how Frederic Bastiat's "Fallacy
of the Broken Window" applies on a general macroeconomic
level, to include the overall impact of war, natural disasters,
and other catastrophes. See also Professor Mark Thornton's
lecture "What Thrives
and Dies During War." Harry Hazlitt observed in his
classic Economics
in One Lesson that despite all efforts to explode
this fallacy, it always continually resurfaces in national
media and the pronouncements of leading politicians.Another
"home run" area involves showing how increasingly
levels of central planning and other forms authoritarianism
tends to produce increasingly levels of inefficiency, economic
mismanagement, and corruption over time. Rockwell, Rothbard,
Hoppe and other colleagues demonstrate how both central government
and central bank interventionism tend to do more to distort
the economy, promote mal-investment, discourage productive
savings and investment, undermine the growth of real productivity,
and otherwise do more damage than good to the economy over
the long run.This
is also contrary to what one typically reads in mainstream
media and hears from leading politicians, but it is true.
A major reason why central bankers and Big Government politicos
have pushed Keynesianism and other snake oil economic creeds
on the public is because at root most of them are shameless
"rent-seekers" (if not outright criminals) who shameless
exploit the police power of the state and milk its prestige
to get something for nothing for themselves. (See the free
online book
Keynes at Harvard: Economic Deception as a Political Credo
by Zygmund Dobbs of the Veritas Foundation which explains
how a leading university got infiltrated and corrupted by
false dogmas perpetrated by leading central bankers and big
government bureaucrats who provide major donations).Although
I generally admire Lew Rockwell's work, my main reservation
with both himself and his colleague Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo is
the way they keep pushing free trade ideology long after conservatives
like Dr. Paul Craig Roberts have woken up to its fallacies.
"Free trade" has become a libertarian religious
icon. Theoretically,
if true libertarianism returns to America, then grass roots
racial nationalism will reemerge as "spontaneous order"
(to use a Hayekian phrase) because people are naturally tribalistic.
However, it will be a cold day in hell when Zionists ever
voluntarily permit their white gentile vassals in America
to reorganize themselves by ethnicity, since historically
ethnic groups comprise the most potent resistance forces against
tyranny --to include the Jewish-flavored varieties. See my
commentary for quiz question 13 "Does
ethnic solidarity matter in defense of liberty?"
for my "Have You Been Brainwashed? Quiz.In
reality, American anarcho-libertarianism is a very strange
animal that helps create the very monsters it subsequently
offers itself as the only solution to get under control. By
encouraging extreme individualism, people become so selfish
and atomized they are incapable of serving as adequate "counter-predators"
against unrestrained growth of government, out of control
Third World immigration, and Zionist criminal mafias. Then
after out-of-control government starts stepping on everyone,
anarcho-libertarians act as if they are the only ones who
fully comprehend these abuses of power, while generally ignoring
outrages committed by Jews and other aliens because they remain
ideologically willfully blind to racial and ethnic differences.Lew
Rockwell links: Lew Rockwell's articles
archive at lewrockwell.comMises
Institute MP3
Archve

Lew Rockwell, 8 May 2009
on Infowars, "We Are Now Nazi Germany"

The Obama Deception by Alex Jones.
In March 2009, three months after our Lone Star Iconoclast
Alert listed in Chapter
35 of the Mission
of Conscience Trilogy, Alex Jones released
his landmark documentary: The Obama Deception which
has a very similar viewpoint. 1:51:21 Here is one web
site overview:
"The Obama Deception is a hard-hitting film that
completely destroys the myth that Barack Obama is working
for the best interests of the American people. The Obama
phenomenon is a hoax carefully crafted by the captains
of the New World Order. He is being pushed as savior in
an attempt to con the American people into accepting global
slavery. We have reached a critical juncture in the New
World Order's plans. and only by exposing the con can
we help to save freedom in America. The Obama Deception
is not about Left or Right: it's about a One World Government.
The international banks plan to loot the people of the
United States and turn them into slaves on a Global Plantation.
Covered in this film: who Obama works for, what lies he
has told, and his real agenda, and how his initial appointments
and actions prove he serves the corporate oligarchs, not
the American people." See also: Review:
The Obama Deception by Alex Jones March 15, 2009

A
dark side to Alex Jones? The
Latest Nazi-Bashing Effort From Jew Shill Alex Jone$tein,
posted on March 12, 2012 by ZionCrimeFactory states "As
expected, kosher conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ latest
`documentary' film entitled `New
World Order: Blueprint of Madmen' is chock-full of references
to and imagery of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany. Capitalizing
on Jewish
Hollywood’s most lucrative cash cow, Alex Jones
doesn’t miss a beat, invoking Hitler and Nazism at
every turn. Not only does he do this because it sells, but
also because he has been assigned the task of propping up
the historical lies and deceptions of the devilish tribe
for whom he is employed by — International Jewry."
[Ed. Note: Watch the video and decide for yourself if you
think Jones is excessively "anarcho-libertarian"
with a pro-Jewish bias, particularly when it comes to handling
German National Socialism].

Alex
Jones is a major leader of Austin, Texas-based
so-called "Patriot Resistance" against "The
New World Order" along with John Stadtmiller of Republic
Broadcasting Network (depicted further down this page in
the nationalist section). He has played an important role
in reaching millions of Americans about such threats as
repeat 9/11-type false flag attacks, loss of American sovereignty
before New World Order cabals, carbon tax and global warming
frauds, food and water additive poisoning, economic melt-down
in America, creation of the police state control grid, and
genocidal global depopulation plans by a totally corrupt
power elite. He admits that he finds it hard to watch mainstream
media without feeling like he is being bombarded with poisonous
messages that try to intimidate Americans out of waking
up to the New World Order.Jones
has been ably assisted by the research and articles of Paul
Joseph Watson, Kurt Nimmo, and other associates. His
documentaries have had a powerful effect in reaching a mass
audience of tens of millions of people. They include Food:
The Ultimate Secret Exposed (July 2010), Don't
Tread on Me: Rise of the Republic (May 2010),
Police
State 4: The Rise of FEMA (April 2010), Invisible
Empire A New World Order Defined (produced
with Jason Bermas, April 2010), Terror
Storm II (Feb 2010, Terror Storm I first released
July 2006), Endgame
(Nov 2009), Fall
of the Republic (Oct 2009), and The
Obama Deception (March 2009), 9/11
-The Road to Tyranny (Feb 2007). Jones was
executive
producer for 9/11 Truth classic Loose
Change Final Cut (Feb 2007).The
good news about all these documentaries is that they provide
valuable information that has been filtered out by mainstream
media. The bad news is that these documentaries are themselves
filtered. They are firmly anarcho-libertarian in their ideological
slant and ignore a honest portrayal of the paleoconservative
and genetic top-down perspectives.One
example of filtering involves Jones' take on issues such
as tribalism and eugenics. While Jones admits that humans
are tribal by nature, he thinks they should try to extend
their tribal instincts across different racial and ethnic
groups. (Who says? Why not use the K.I.S.S. principle and
let them start with the group ethnically and genetically
closest to themselves first and then build outward from
there?) He also uses the term "eugenics" with
a very negative connotation and lambastes "Nazi conspiracies,"
which sometimes appear to be hiding behind every bush. As
I discuss further down this
page, Jones loves to tie in his concept of "Nazi
eugenics" with "globalist" eugenics programs
for global depopulation. One
can argue that the issue of "eugenics" is not
that simple, since it is practiced one way or another by
virtually everyone, either through omission or commission,
either consciously or subconsciously. (Many sociobiologists
would argue that eugenics is always practiced by virtually
everyone to some degree or another at least a subconscious
level; for example informal mate selection -- such as when
intelligent beautiful women prefer to date intelligent,
handsome, successful men and shun ugly idiot failures --
is inherently a eugenic decision). The United States Government
has spent untold trillions on the greatest negative
eugenics program in world history by supporting the accelerated
reproduction of people of poor character and low IQ on its
welfare programs and also by opening its borders to tidal
waves of Third World illegal alien immigrants. (The correct
term for "negative eugenics" is "dysgenics."
The Jewish power elite generally promotes dysgenics
for gentiles while supporting "eugenics" fortheir own kind, similar to the very ancient PSYOP formula
"openly promote leftism among those outside your own
tribal group to induce them to drop their guard and become
weaker, and quietly encourage rightism among those within
your own group to build their cohesion and other forms of
tribal strength"). In
regard to Jones' talk about alleged "Nazi conspiracies,"
many historians such as David Irving and even Pat Buchanan
do not believe that Hitler had an aggressive intention to
take over the world. He could not even cross the English
Channel to take Britain, much less cross the Atlantic to
conquer America.When
Alex Jones' talks about a deliberate "globalist conspiracy"
to outsource America's strategic industries, collapse the
economy, genocide Americans with "soft kill" toxins
(Eg. when controlled mainstream media deliberately ignore
Fukushima radiation, American nuclear power plant melt-down
risks and routine
radiation leaks, chemtrails,
toxic
drinking water and vaccine additives, etc), and liquidate
Americans in FEMA camps, I view this as an inaccurate
analysis, although I fully agree with Jones that the situation
is indeed very real, very serious, and very dangerous. I
prefer Dr. William Pierce's assessment in his article "The
Scorpion and the Frog" that much of the behavior
of the Jewish power elite reflects a semi-conscious biological
"tropism" that has resulted from the Jews' unique
evolutionary history that has become stamped into their
DNA. I do not think that elite Jews necessarily start
with a conscious master plan for global enslavement
and 90% global depopulation (as reflected, for example,
in the "Georgia Guidestones" or "U.N. Agenda
21"), although certainly these kinds of murderous things
are sanctioned in the hateful Talmud. I
think that Jewish "elitists" usually start out
when they initially infiltrate a relatively un-infested,
pristine, productive, and homogeneous gentile society by
being naturally extremely greedy and addicted to intrigue
and speculation. Within one portion of their naturally fractured
personalities, they cannot shake these addictions, which
also include a long term historical sociological addiction
towards introducing other aliens into formerly homogeneous
gentile societies and mixing them up racially and ethnically,
as if engaging in a form of "macro ethno-social pedophilia."
Within other portions of their fractured psyches, Jews envy
and admire WASPs and engage in adaptive mimicry so long
as WASPs remain in the "up" position.The
fact that Jews naturally have very fractured psyches is
a major reason why Israel has more psychiatrists per capita
than any other country, and is also rated as more corrupt
than any European country. In this area I can speak from
some personal experience. I lived in New York City for ten
years and was surrounded by Jews. Many of my gentile friends
who had similar experiences frequently talked about how
much they wanted to leave NYC to "detox." One
one side of their fractured personalities, Jews can come
across as unusually personable, humorous, charming, articulate,
learned, intelligent, and sophisticated. On another side
of the "fractures," they can also come across
as one of the ugliest, sickest, nastiest, meanest, and most
"messed up," "neurotic," deceitful,
rude, vicious, sinister, greedy, coldly manipulative, underhanded,
and pushy peoples on the planet. (All these descriptive
terms heard live on the streets of New York City
numerous times, I swear!)After
Jews become so successful that their shady tactics start
breaking down the overall system --particularly after their
control of a privately owned central bank fiat money system
like the Federal Reserve runs debt into the stratosphere
and the currency into the ground -- and after WASPs slip
into a "down" position, then elite Jewish
psychopaths start devising ever more desperate and ruthless
plans to keep their enemies from undoing their swindles
rather than "come clean." (Remember, the standard
behavior for psychopaths
--to include heavily inbred psychopathic tribes like Jews--
is "They are either at your feet or at your throat."
Once Jews are no longer at the feet of WASPs after a successful
climb in power, they are viciously at WASP throats). At
this point, the usual Jewish paranoia goes on steroids,
and the Jewish power elite starts devising ways to mass
murder tens of millions of gentiles, just like when Jewish-Bolsheviks
played the key role in the mass murder of 60 million people
(the estimate of Alexandr Solzhenitsyn) in the Soviet Union,
rather than suffer any form of retribution. The Jewish power
elite also tends to accelerate the rate in which it loots
a country on the theory that when everything breaks down,
it must be in the strongest material position possible relative
to everyone else. Bernie Madoff's grand
Wall Street swindle and Hank
Paulson's multi-trillion dollar shakedown of Congress
have been such obscenely obvious outrages that many Americans
are beginning to conclude that many so-called "conspiracy
theorists" have in fact been dealing with "conspiracy
fact." (Check out Chapter
33 and Gov. Jesse Ventura's "Wall
Street" episode in his "Conspiracy
Theory" series, "Season 2"). From
the Jewish point of view, everything they do is usually
somehow "defensive." After all, the world owes
them a living and a license to engage in unlimited speculative
activity at gentile expense, because the Talmud says so,
and also because they are the "Chosen." Anyone
who disagrees with them is automatically an evil anti-Semite
who fails to understand "nice Jewish boys" who
simply "make a few mistakes" and "just need
to make some money." Their Jewish mothers coddled them
when they got caught fibbing, so what can't the rest of
the world be just as compassionate?An
important key to understanding Jewish behavior is the strong
likelihood that Jews are the most psychopathic inbred group
of people on the planet. As one of my abnormal psychology
textbooks pointed out back in my college days, when psychopaths
are in the "down" position, they will stop at
nothing to curry favor. When they are in an "up"
position, they have no internal self-restraint to prevent
them from becoming the most cruel and vicious tyrants imaginable.
(Once again, they are "either at your feet or at your
throat"). I discuss this and other interesting Jewish
behavioral phenomena in the "parasitism"
section of my online "mutualism vs. parasitism"
article.Alex
Jones is certainly a huge improvement over the overtly pro-Zionist
neocon "right wing" talk radio show hosts like
Michael
Savage (born Jewish as Michael Alan Wiener) and Rush
Limbaugh (who takes vacations in Israel) for his willingness
to occasionally identify leading Jews such as the Rothschilds,
Larry Silverstein, and Henry Kissinger at the top of New
World Order cabals. Given the current realities of a thoroughly
dumbed-down American public brainwashed by multi-racialism,
multiculturalism, Holocaustianity, and Christian Zionist-style
Israel worship in mass media, maybe Jones' brand of anarcho-libertarianism
is about as far as someone can push the envelop and still
reach an American audience in the millions. On top of all
this, many people like his persona as a self-styled red-blooded,
manly "fightin' Texan" willing to stand above
America's all too abundant masses of effeminized, conformist,
wimpy, metro-sexual males, although some may wonder if Jones'
stage personality gets a bit "schmaltzy," "showy"
and overdone at times, showing a possible Jewish "chutzpah"
influence on Jones' psyche. This is a tricky issue for me
personally, since I have always admired the manliness, adventurousness,
and special "fighting spirit" of Texas "cowboys"
(reminiscent of Norsemen in the sagas) --so long as these
things are handled in an appropriate manner -- but at the
same time I bitterly resent people like Lyndon Baines Johnson
(part Jewish, a Big Government centralizer, social reengineer,
globalist, and a likely ringleader in the JFK assassination
-- see Gov. Jesse Ventura's "Conspiracy Theory"
episode
on the JFK assassination), and George W. Bush
(a demonic pervert, globalist, Zionist bootlick, Judas Goat,
and an original "Connecticut Yankee" who has learned
how to affect a phony Texas cowboy accent -- see Chapt.
5) who have tried to hijack the "Texas
mystique" for their own nefarious political agendas.Alex
Jones has his critics, to be sure, such as the September
9. 2009 articleThe
Alex Jones Deception: False Flag Journalism Discrediting
The Truth Movement, Victor Thorn's Hall
of Shame at WingTV.net, the Gentile Alliance
Jones
web page, and Eric Hufschmid's expose
page. See also Jeff Rense's summary expose
page with numerous links titled "Who
IS This Man...Really?"Brother
Nathanael Kapner, a Jewish convert to Christianity, has
written some excellent analyses of Jones, such as "Is
Alex Jones A Zionist Shill?...Controversy Swirls"
and "Why
Is The ADL Promoting Alex Jones?" In the
latter article, Kapner comments: "...Jones,
his program, his sites (at least five of them), and through
his documentaries are essentially the core of a mass desensitizing
operation. When viewing
his ‘films,’ most come away feeling as if they’ve
been bludgeoned and beaten to near hopelessness. And that,
of course, is the very idea. All the talk about ‘taking
the country back’ basically runs most people into
the ground…and many of them become moribund, disheartened…or
just quit.When
Jones keeps pounding home the theme about the ALL-powerful
Global Elite - but not mentioning that Zionist Jews ARE
the great majority of the elite - the message of who is
really running the West and America is lost..." Elsewhere,
Brother Kapner talks about how Jones is meant to serve as
"fly-paper" for the political Right in America.
I think that this a very profound insight, and I want to
add on to it here with my own interpretations. First,
Jones offers four hours of programming each week day (although
the 4th hour is typically a rebroadcast) and two hours each
Sunday, which probably soaks up all the time that most people
who work normal jobs to support themselves have in order
to obtain alternative news. By giving the appearance that
he offers "all the news that is fit to print,"
(a longstanding motto of the Zionist-controlled New
York Times) it does not matter how much truth Jones
lets out to the public as long as he leads the pack and
the public remains fairly passive while the power elite
plays for time to perfect its control grid, censor the Internet,
and go back to deeply brainwashing the public with controlled
national media just like what they did throughout most of
the 20th century in the pre-Internet era. Second,
Jones can monitor the most creative and truly independent
ideas of alternative media and then coopt their message
without giving them attribution, while at the same time
spin-doctoring these ideas to fit his Zionist tolerant,
anarcho-libertarian paradigm and bolster his own image as
a creative populist. This is analogous to the way the Democrats
and Republicans -- America's "Republicrat two party
monopoly" for "Big Government" -- typically
monitor independent populist movements and coopt and adapt
their best ideas. Using this tactic, they simultaneously
reinvigorate their own democratic base while taking the
wind out of the sails of their competition. Similarly, in
the business world medium to large-sized corporations that
have lost the ability to innovate often steal intellectual
properties from small company entrepreneurs every way in
which they think they can get away with it.In
other words, a major function of Jones is to prevent opposition
to the power elite from ever launching a truly effective
counter movement to regain control of America while the
power elite steadily lets out enough truth to play for time.
A truly effective counter-movement would have strong ethnic
and racial nationalist overtones to differentiate most whites
from the Jewish power elite on a religious, ethnic, moral,
and racial as well as ideological level, but Jones will
always keep the debate generally framed within the anarcho-libertarian
ideological box and avoid going near historically proven
"tribal behavior" engines of effective political
action. My comments which characterize Ron Paul as "necessary
but not sufficient" in Chapter
29"Candidate Klock, The Spook
Nuke Threat and the Ron Paul Libertarian Revolution"
of my Mission of Conscience series
also apply to Alex Jones (who fervently promotes Ron Paul).
Far
from constituting the ultimate dreaded "enemy"
of the "evil empire," Alex Jones and Ron Paul
are actually the "reservation price" for the globalists.
In academic analyses of the "art of negotiation,"
a "reservation price" is the lowest price that
a prospective seller is willing to settle before he walks
away from a deal situation. Typically a shrewd haggler --
a trait for which Jews are famous -- will typically in the
role of a seller demand a "high" price at the
beginning of negotiation and make a prospective buyer work
hard to haggle them down to their reservation price, often
screaming bloody murder ever inch of the way to make it
appear that the buyer is driving a hard bargain, when in
fact the seller was secretly willing to settle for the "You
are twisting my arm! You are taking the shirt right off
my back!!!" price all along. Furthermore, human nature
being what it is, when one makes a buyer work hard to make
a deal, he values it more. This is the kind of real estate
negotiation psychology that Robert Ringer explains in his
classic work Winning Through Intimidation,
which the Jewish power elite practices routinely in the
political realm as well as in the business world.On
a political level, a leftist puppet like Obama or a neo-con
stooge like George Bush are simply the "high prices"
that Jewish hagglers in control of U.S. mainstream media
and the "Democrat" political parties have pushed
in front of a gullible U.S. public. Since Americans were
stupid enough to settle for these clowns, Jewish oligarchs
were more than happy to stick it to the "schmucks,"
just like Jewish commercial real estate owners are usually
all too delighted to sell their properties at their initial
ask "dream prices" to any idiot buyers swayed
by hype who are too lazy to even visit properties and verify
the rent roll. From
the long term perspective of 400 years of American history,
or most European romantic nationalist movements of the 19th
century, or the philosophical outlook outlined by Sir Arthur
Keith in A New Theory of Evolution or Dr. Raymond
Cattell in Beyondism: Religion From Science, Alex
Jones simply carries the football from deep inside our end
of the playing field to the 50 yard line while creating
the appearance that the Jewish globalists are screaming
"Oy! You are twisting my arm!" every inch of the
way, that is, if a populist revolt ever brings Jewish oligarchs
to their "reservation price." The political version
of this reservation price is Ron Paul as president, an individual
who never confronts Jews publicly as any kind of
innately exploitive alien biological or sociological phenomenon.
High level Jewish criminals would probably be absolved of
all their "sins" if they superficially convert
to Ron Paul's anarch-libertarian political religion, just
like Marrano Jews once escaped persecution and wealth confiscation
during the Middle Ages and got a second lease on life by
superficially converting to Catholicism. If
the "Ron Paul Libertarian Revolution" is all that
Americans can ever accomplish, Jews will still continue
to find ways to operate behind the scenes in one form or
another as fat and happy monopolists/oligarchs at the top
of the power pyramid, and Nordic Celtic genetic stock will
still continue to decline as a percentage of the overall
population while knocking itself out on idealistic anarcho-libertarian
crusades carefully framed by Alex Jones and his associates.
(Speaking of associates, one of Jones' more colorful "anti-globalist"
guests is Gerald Celente, who delivers his "kosher
hard right" commentary with a sharp New York Jewish-accented
whine and yap). This
"limited hang out," "controlled opposition,"
and "Trojan Horse" strategem reminds me of the
ploy described by G. Edward Griffin in The
Creature From Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal
Reserve or by Eustace Mullins in The
Secrets of the Federal Reserve (pdf) where a plan
to curtail the "money trusts" that got finessed
through Congress with the passage of the Federal Reserve
Act of 1913 had in fact been designed and promoted by
the very money trusts it was supposed to curtail, complete
with fake "controlled opposition" against the
money trust that gave the Trojan Horse plan "street
credibility" among populist movements. In Chapter
33 "Wall Street Coup de Etat and Banker
False Flags Against America" of my Mission
of Conscience series one can find a historical
overview of various other schemes to permanently foist a
privately-owned central bank on America, as well as transcript
extracts of the outstanding video The Money Masters
which explains how Paul Warburg, a Rothschild agent, designed
the Federal Reserve plan as a Trojan Horse, and how he coordinated
in secret with other plutocratic Rothschild/City of London
agents such as J.P. Morgan and John D. Rockefeller.This
strategy also reminds me of how the world was once divided
between two different leftist ideological camps during the
Cold War -- both of which were friendly to Jews. The U.S.S.R.,
founded by Jewish Bolsheviks, was "hard left,"
whereas the U.S.A., dominated by the Jewish-controlled privately
owned Federal Reserve Banking System, Jewish-controlled
national media, and Jewish pressure groups (like the ADL,
SPLC), was a "soft left" mixture of remnants of
a "free enterprise" system and the Big Government-run
welfare-warfare state. The aforementioned video The
Money Masters explains how none of this was an accident,
because in the 20th century major Wall Street and City of
London bankers aggressively funded and shaped both sides.
Similarly, on an internal level the Jewish plutocracy wants
to keep the ideological debate confined two ideological
sandboxes: between neo-Jacobinism (environmental top down)
preached by "mainstream media," and anarcho-libertarianism,
as preached by Alex Jones who calls himself the leader of
"alternative media." (Please see the ideology
matrix chart at the top of this web page to get a clearer
idea of what I mean by "environmental top down"
neo-Jacobinism vs. "environmental bottom up" anarcho-libertarianism).All
of the aforementioned ideological areas permit Jews to operate
at the highest levels, because their leftist-environmental
ideological characteristics deflect attention away from
alien Jewish racial characteristics. "Environmental"
ideologies help anesthetize the racial and ethnic consciousness
of various white groups and prevent them from demanding
that only representatives of their own kind control the
strategic basis of society, thereby sweeping Jews out of
power. Whites remained conned into ignoring one of the basic
rules of Right Wing 101, namely that as ethnic-genetic distance
increases, the risks of parasitism and predation increase,
whereas as ethnic-genetic distance decreases, the chances
of mutualism and altruism increase. Therefore, all things
being equal, it is always better for any racial or ethnic
group to have only its own kind in control of the strategic
bases of society. As
someone with strong paleoconservative leanings, I believe
that if one is really serious about recreating
the passion for individual liberty that existed among Amerians
in 1776, one must also recreate key sociological conditions
which supported liberty in that era. I describe those conditions
in some detail in my commentary
regarding question 13 "Does ethnic solidarity matter
in the defense of liberty?" in my "Have
You Been Brainwashed?" quiz. When we finally hear
major talk show commentators seriously talk about implementing
viable action plans to arrest all high level Jewish
plutocratic criminals and strip them of their ill-gotten
wealth -- and punish their gentile collaborators -- and
to rehabilitate WASPs and create self-consciously homogeneous
Nordic, Celtic, and other European ethno-states in North
America with full sovereignty rights and restored
indigenous European cultural and religious values and identities
-- and where individuals beyond a certain level of ethnic-genetic
distance (like Jews) are prohibited from ever gaining any
control whatsoever over strategic bases of power within
their respective countries (strategic bases include such
areas as banking, major media, government, military, and
the medical-pharmaceutical complex.) -- and where progress
is measured on a genetic as well as on a financial level
(the leaders of these new ethnostates never acknowledge
"progress" as long as their own core ethnic group
is in demographic decline and is reproducing more low quality
than high quality people) -- NOW YOU ARE TALKING! Now instead
of just advancing the football to the 50 yard line, we are
heading deep towards the enemy 20 yard line...ten yard line...and
on to TOUCHDOWN! Hey,
LET'S
ROLL!In
the Alex Jones version of reality, Americans are faced only
with a stark choice between either uniting and even martyring
themselves for an abstraction called "liberty"
or else eventually suffering a totally dark endgame where
everyone is enslaved with high tech devices -- everyone
except for a globalist power elite of "eugenicists"
who rule through terror and stealth genocides to "cull
out" people they don't like. (With mass death as the
"reservation price" on one end of the "negotiation,"
Americans will feel relieved to still live in a multi-racial
society with Jews on top as long as someone like Ron Paul
becomes president and gives Americans back some "liberty"
for a change). While Alex Jones certainly reports cutting
edge news on the latest outrages of the growing police state,
he is also like a "new product development lab"
for "controlled opposition," "limited hang
out" and "full spectrum dominance" practitioners
by enshrouding all unfolding developments with an anarcho-libertarian
ideological interpretation.Seen
from this perspective, Alex Jones is not only the "Info
Warrior" he purports to be, but he is also a very clever
and sophisticated Info War tool for the very side he claims
he is fighting. He is a Texas-flavored, "up-gunned"
version of Michael Savage, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh,
just one more click to the right, but still not far
enough. Alternative
medicine activist Dr. Leonard Horowitz, like fellow Jewish
dissident Brother Nathanael Kapner, is also unhappy with
Alex Jones. In his 28 July 2010 article coauthored with
Sherri Kane titled "WAR
on The World: Rothschild League’s 30 Facts Evidencing
Gulf Oil Disaster Was Planned," for item
#30, Dr. Horowitz states: "Homeland Security medical
officials are also now implicated in fraudulently promoting
(through Alex
Jones) a `decoy product' for infectious disease markets
called
Silver Sol for profit and probably depopulation as well.
(CLICK
HERE for the shocking story.)"The
13 Aug 2010 article Alex
Jones promotes Zionist heretics Jeffrey and Missler
at the Fitzpatrick Informer comments: "Evidence
continues to mount against American radio show host and
self-proclaimed patriot Alex Jones that he is a counter-intelligence
operative working for the state of Israel..."Many
observers feel that Alex Jones' "Hollywood
Is Owned by the Arabs (video)" rhetoric,
repeated as recently as August 2010, is a clear "smoking
gun" about his ultimate loyalties.Rev
Ted Pike weighed in with his 7 Sept 2010 article "An
Open Letter to Alex Jones" and his 9 Sept
2010 article Jones
to Pike: "Don't Criticize Jews."In
the latter article, Pike summarizes:
"What I learned, beyond any doubt, was that Alex Jones
cannot be depended upon to provide the populist right with
all the facts necessary to understand geopolitical reality.
If he will censor the truth concerning a threat as dominant
and well-documented as Jewish supremacism, what else will
he manipulate?"On
air, Jones
admitted his wife has some Jewish ancestry. A number
of people wonder where he gets all the money necessary to
fund his productions and wide distribution, such as Michael
Collins Piper. Listen to Mike Piper describe his perceptions
of Jones as a "Judas Goat" in his 29 Dec podcast
MP3 (download Here)
and 31 Dec podcast MP3 (download Here),
at: michaelcollinspiper.podbean.com.
Piper believes that Jones is misdirecting people, omitting
important facts, and confusing important issues, to include
misrepresenting historical facts about Nazi Germany in an
effort to create a contemporary Nazi boogeyman behind "The
New World Order." In his bookThe
New Babylon, Piper explains how Zionism and Jewish
plutocracy comprise the main forces behind the New World
Order rather than latter day "Nazis." Piper recommends
the web site alexjonesexposed.wordpress.com.
In
his 2012 book Confessions of an Anti-Semite, Mike
Piper writes:

On
October 6, 1940, The New York Times featured
a revealing story reporting that Arthur Greenwood -- deputy
leader of the British Labor Party and a member without
portfolio in the British War Cabinet--had "assured
the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved
an effort would be made to found a new world order based
on the ideals of `justice and peace,'" and that--as
the Times assessed it --"after the war an
opportunity would be given to Jews everywhere to make
a `distinctive and constructive contribution' in rebuilding
of the world." The Times not only featured
the phrase "New World Order" in the headline
... but in a secondary subhead repeated the concept: "New
World Order Forecast." As anyone who understands
the special role of the Times as a voice for
Jewish interests -- and the New World Order-- knows, this
specific phraseology was no accident.Now,
today, long after Hitler and the Nazis were vanquished
in World War II, they are still the subject of constant
discussion by Alex Jones -- the self-described "biggest
name" in the "truth movement" whose lucrative
career was launched by a the Jewish-owned television station
in Texas and now sponsored by a Jewish-owned radio giant
Sirius -- and by Glenn Beck, the television and radio
rabble-rouser made into a superstar by Zionist billionaire
Rupert Murdoch's Fox News...(page 22)....The
distraction of "Nazism" and -- as the likes
of Alex Jones and others of his ilk would have it -- the
threat of "the New Nazism," coupled with the
un-ending drumbeat about "anti-Semitism" and
"the Holocaust" constitute mind control mechanisms
designed to prevent people from confronting the real
forces and ideology behind the New World Order. The
truth is that when one dares to mention Jewish media control
or Jewish financial influence--or just simply the Jewish
lobby (with tentacles that reach into all manner of domestic
affairs, far beyond its role in foreign policy) -- that
is a direct challenge to the New World Order.Those
who have been misled and told to "say nothing"
when it comes to these matters are being led to the slaughter
by Judas Goats (posing as "patriot leaders")
who win great acclaim (and make big money) by "exposing"
a variety of nefarious, spooky-sounding conspiracies,
but who--at the same time--avoid addressing the very real
down-to-earth forces behind the New World Order they claim
to be fighting.And
the real irony of it all is that these same phony patriots
-- who avoid mentioning the Jewish origins of the New
World Order-- are among the loudest and most vociferous
in continuing to crank up the mantra about "Hitler
and the Nazis" and "the Holocaust," even
to the point of suggesting that it is actually surviving
remnants of the Third Reich-- yes, those "Nazis"--
who are really behind the New World Order. And some even
say-- get this-- that "The Rothschilds aren't really
Jewish." Based
on more than three decades of study and interacting with
a broad-ranging number of very real experts, I say this
with conviction: Jewish power does lie at the root of
the New World Order and until that is acknowledged by
those who say they they are fighting against this intended
Global Plantation, there is no way it will be defeated....(page
27) ...Jones
and Beck and others of his ilk tell lie after lie about
"Hitler and the Nazis" and shriek about "The
Holocaust" as part of their unending campaign to
distort the reality of what is happening in our world
today. Every time they conjure up these images they gratuitously
lend their support to ushering in the New World Order
which relies so foundationally on this false rhetoric
and upon historical lies. And while the likes of Jones
and Beck would have us believe they offer an alternative
to the "mainstream media" they are, in fact,
underscoring its message...(page 452)

.Interstingly
enough, Alex Jones has not been completely hostile towards
The American
Free Press (originally The SPOTLIGHT),
that has been home base for Mike Piper's career as a journalist
spanning several decades. Jones has repeatedly interviewed
Bilderberg sleuth Jim Tucker of the American Free Press
as well as AFP journalist Mark
Anderson.In
Chapter
10 of my Mission of Conscience
Trilogy, I mention Capt.
Eric May's complaint that Alex Jones has ignored his
alerts. According to Capt. May, Alex Jones accused him of
being COINTELPRO to Stephen Webster who worked on the staff
of the Lone Star Iconoclast. Capt. May makes no
bones about his U.S. Army Intelligence Officer background,
(see Chapter
1 of the Mission of Conscience Series),
and admits that he has played a "double game"
through his relationship with people like high level Jewish-born
Bush Administration official Chase Untermeyer, but he also
claims he has been firmly on the patriot side since the
Battle of Baghdad cover-up -- and probably got "neurotoxined"
with ALS for his efforts. In his 15 Dec 2010 article Urgent
Infowar Discussion: Is Alex Jones a Judas?,
Capt. May made it clear to the public where he stands regarding
Alex Jones. In his 27 March 2011 article BREAKING:
Pacifex 11 Linked to Asian Earthquake, he recommended
readers link to: Alex
Jones Ex Fan - Re: To Cursing Out Mike Delaney at Prothink.org
(video). (See
also Alex Jones Zionist behavior (video)).
Despite
negative things said by various detractors about Alex Jones,
his ability to reach a mass audience, expose past false
flag operations, and directly denounce the criminality of
the "power elite" and "globalists" (however
vaguely defined) remains impressive. He has is a very intelligent
man, with an excellent memory for details and ability to
identify inane contradictions that surround us. His work
has helped inspire other important alternative electronic
media with a similar libertarian bent, such as The
Corbett Report run by James Corbett, an ex-patriot
Canadian currently living in Western Japan, and Media
Monarchy run by James Pilato (who
interviewed this author on 30 July 2009) based in Portland,
Oregon. I
draw heavily upon many works of Alex Jones, Paul Watson,
Kurt Nimmo, and other InfoWar.com associates in my Mission
of Conscience Trilogy because of their excellence
in certain areas. I quote from his interviews with people
like former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura, Dr. Paul Craig
Roberts, Alan Watt, David Icke, Sheriff
Richard Mack, and Birgitta
Jonsdottir, Member of Parliament in Iceland. But then
again, I am openly and consciously eclectic. Admittedly
my own personal political approach is geared to my own unique
background involving sales experience, academia, and other
influences. It is not necessarily appropriate for other
American activists. It will probably take many different
approaches by many different kinds of people on many different
levels of our society to win our struggle. I like the famous
dictum of Socrates "If I know anything, it is that
I know nothing." I never know the whole truth, but
arrive at truth by piecing together information from many
different sources, to include Alex Jones.An
important issue for me remains how to offer the public a
positive vision that can rebuild a successful society without
getting drowned in all the ugliness and criminality that
the power elite keeps throwing at us. At the beginning of
Chapter
37 I talk about how PSYOP approaches like fear
mongering and predictive programming can be used as
tools by the power elite to preoccupy the public and frighten
it into appeasement and acquiescence. Even Alex Jones admits
that educating the public about the terrible things that
evil New World Order cabals are trying to do to us can become
self-defeating at that point when people become paralyzed
with fear or fatalistic, and lose the will to openly and
aggressively defend their Constitutional rights. A huge
part of the answer for me personally involves trying to
rebuild the kind of social fabric and indigenous values
that once worked for my own ancestors. Alex
Jones' hard line anarcho-libertarianism, where he continually
beats his breast about how he does not care at all about
race or ethnicity and only judges people as individuals,
goes against my own brand of paleoconservativism where I
recognize that people act in society both as individuals
and as part of groups. Their behavior is often every bit
as much instinctive and tribal as it is rational and individualized.
In the real world, most people require the support of a
tribal group to stand up to tyranny. It
may not make globalists feel particularly comfortable to
see growing masses of Americans protest their outrageous
crimes and (neo-Jacobin) police state corruption from an
anarcho-libertarian ideological perspective, but as a fall
back position, it is safer for them to see Americans simply
chant "Protect the Constitution!," "Protect
the Constitution!" from the purely libertarian perspective
advocated by Jones than to also see them circle the wagons
on a biological level, with almost the same instinctive
fury that honey bees display when they suddenly recognize
a Death's-head
Hawkmoth parasite within their colony and then converge
on it to sting it. A big part of Alex Jones' alleged Trojan
Horse function may be to mentally disconnect Americans from
consciously recognizing "Jewish racial reality"
and "Zionist criminality." The same goes with
innate biological
differences involving other groups of Americans, to
include Mexicans, most of whom are Mestizos. Here, Jones
encourages white Americans to ignore racial and ethnic differences
as well. I
am certainly all for "Protecting the Constitution,"
it is just that I also believe that "Protecting the
Constitution" is just a starting point -- a "necessary,
but not sufficient" condition -- for sorting out America's
problems.In
some situations, your
skin color becomes your "uniform" whether
you want it to be this way or not, such as the well-publicized
Reginald
Denny case during the 1992 Los Angeles riots where a
white construction truck driver got dragged from his cab
and nearly beaten to death by a gang of blacks for simply
being white. On
a more subtle level, just because a particular topic is
totally taboo in current public discussion does not prevent
it from remaining a very real factor in human affairs. For
example, one taboo topic remains Protestant vs. Catholic
conflict, supposedly rendered a "non-issue" by
the "melting pot" and enlightened rationalist
instruction in our public schools long ago. Yet in big cities
like New York, Chicago, and Boston, Italian and Irish Catholics
often ally themselves with Jews against WASPs.As
Dr. Lothrop Stoddard explained in his landmark 1924 work
Racial
Realities in Europe, one reason why this conflict
is unlikely to ever completely go away is that "Protestantism"
has had a high historical correlation with "Nordics"
and closely related Celts, whereas "Catholicism"
has had a much higher correlation with other types of Celtic,
Mediterranean, and Alpine branches of Caucasian peoples
--and each group has distinctive cognitive, temperamental,
and emotional characteristics embedded in their DNA that
can make "getting along" tricky on certain social,
political, and economic issues. Among other things, "Alpines"
as a group tend to be much more authoritarian and dogmatic
compared to "Nordics," who tend to be more adventurous,
individualistic, rationalistic, emotionally distant (often
interpreted or misinterpreted by others as "arrogance")
and entrepreneurial. (See more discussion by Dr. Stoddard
in Appendix
I of Part
6 of my Iceland
Gets "ENRONed" series, as well as
in the "Handling Real Nazis" section of Chapter
34 of the Mission of Conscience series.)
After
reading Racial
Realities in Europe, one might get the impression
that the policy of forcefully entangling Nordics with other
types of whites within the context of the "pluralistic"
American empire has been a long term sociological disaster.
It has actually reversed the process in which Nordics
separated themselves on a social and political
as well as theological level from other whites in Europe
during the Protestant Reformation, or later separated themselves
from the British Empire during the American War of Independence.
Today
"federalism" has become America's omnipresent
secular state religion, and the U.S. Government -- disproportionately
influenced by Jews at the top and non-Nordics everywhere
else -- has taken on all the corrupt, totalitarian, dogmatic,
and inefficient characteristics of the Catholic Church that
Martin Luther protested against in the 16th century. The
Catholic Church of the late Middle Ages had become a totally
corrupt rent-seeking
operation masquerading as a religion, and today the U.S.
Government, intertwined with a nexus of military-industrial-central
banking-big corporate interests, Mossad-CIA, and the Jewish
Lobby, are all essentially just a governmental and special
interest version of the same thing. Both systems were supported
on the backs of large masses of gullible, petty people with
a lowly peasant mentalities who were incapable of acting
as the intelligent counter predators necessary to keep tyrannical
predators in check. Reminiscent
of the "witch-hunts
and wars of religion and imperial conquest"
once promoted by the 16th and 17th century Catholic Church,
Mossad-CIA today creates false flag terror attacks, Guantanamo
torture, the Al Qaeda boogeyman (see Chapter
12), and the destruction of civil liberties
at home. Meanwhile, in the Gulf of Mexico, the Rothschild-controlled
oil company British Petroleum has exercised
its "Divine
Right" to control
the Obama Administration, violate virtually
all safety standards, manipulate
major media and local police, and shorten
the lives of millions of Americans (let
them eat cake!) by flaunting prohibitions against using
the highly toxic dispersant Corexit. As
a horrifying opening night performance after the BP-Gulf
dress rehearsal, there is strong evidence that Mossad-CIA-MI6
and their Rothschild/City of London/global Jewish controllers
also gave us the Fukushima
meltdowns on 3-11 2011 through Stuxnet virus sabotage.
Radiation experts Leuren
Moret and Dr.
Chris Busby believe this could cause over 300 times
more damage than Chernobyl, which itself caused the early
deaths of an estimated million people and incapacited over
eight million people in the twenty five years following
the 1986 explosion and melt-down. As suggested by my "Aerial
Dance of Mass Death" week by week chart
series, this could cause tens of millions of Americans to
suffer early deaths, incapacitation, and genetic mutiliation
of all future generations. If
old northern European heroes and heroines who fought for
political decentralization and human liberty in the face
of "New World Order" threats of their era could
turn in their graves, then Arminius,
Martin
Luther, Queen
Elizabeth I of England, and Gustavus
Adolfus would probably be running high RPM right now.
Don't forget Thomas Jefferson either, who once created an
Anglo-Saxon grammar book to help Anglo-Americans regain
a greater sense of their roots, and later in life stated
that peoples from northern Europe were better suited for
republican government than people from southern Europe.
(See. Elena
Kagan and the Decline of WASP America by Kevin
MacDonald, Ph. D, The Nationalist Times, May 2010,
for more on what happens when Jews and their minions displace
WASPs). In
spirit, if not in actual public statements, the current
phony "War on Terror," and creation of the "Homeland
Security" apparatus (currently run by a Catholic of
probable Jewish descent named Janet
Napolitano, and formerly by a Jew named Michael
Chertoff who turned loose the 9/11
"dancing Israelis" and "art students"
and has been a major profiteer
on cancer-causing airport body scanners) and the Federally-controlled,
militarized police state (see Chapter
31 of the Mission of Conscience series), might
be interpreted as a devious Jewish-Catholic effort to further
marginalize and even ultimately eliminate WASP influence
in America, just as initial 16th and 17th century Protestant
gains got wiped out in France and Austria in the animated
map below.

Wikipedia caption from article The
Protestant Reformation: "Reformation and Counter
Reformation in Europe. Protestant lands in blue (with
gains and the losses due to the Counter Reformation),
Catholic
in olive."

There
was nothing accidental about the Protestant roll-back depicted
above. For example, as part of the Counter Reformation,
the Pope created the Jesuits who took a personal loyalty
oath to their temporal maximum leader, underscoring an authoritarian
theme that would later be echoed in the 20th century. According
to "Fascism,
Sequel to Communism:"

Hitler's
feared SS troops and the Gestapo were also closely connected
with the Jesuits. Hitler referred to Himmler, who headed
the SS, as "our Ignatius of Loyola." The SS's
black uniforms were based on the Jesuits' robes and many
Jesuits participated in the SS - including Himmler's uncle
who was a senior SS officer and a Jesuit priest. The SS
skull and cross bones also appears at the ceremony of
the Jesuit oath

...Therefore
to the utmost of my power I will defend this doctrine
and His Holiness's right and custom against all usurpers
of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially
the Lutheran Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden
and Norway, and the now pretended authority and Churches
of England and Scotland, and the branches of same now
established in Ireland and on the continent of America
and elsewhere and all adherents in regard that they may
be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church
of Rome... ...will
unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may
receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope...

Chapter
5 ofthe Mission of Conscience
series contains an important historical example of a particularly
horrible Jewish-Catholic Alliance. An excerpt from the lecture
"The
Fall of Poland" by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson
describes how a partnership between a corrupted Polish Catholic
nobility and Jewish middlemen reduced the Polish people
into the worst form of slavery in Europe during the 16th-17th
centuries. More often than not, Jews manipulated the nobility
rather than the other way around.During
this dark period, 80% of the world's Jewish population moved
to the Polish empire, which became not only "The New
Jerusalem," but also a prototype for the kind of "New
World Order" tyranny that Jews would later try to fasten
on to the United States and entire world. What
Would It Take? by Edmund Connelly, Occidental
Observer, 15 July 2010 makes the point that things
could go from bad to worse when white Americans -- on track
to become an absolute minority in a couple of decades--
could become extermination targets, just as millions of
whites have already been driven
into poverty and starvation in South Africa under black
rule. Given
the seriousness of this overall situation, Alex Jones is
not doing his audiences a favor when he fails to inform
them regarding the racial motivations behind anti-WASP marginalization
in particular, and anti-White genocide in general, by an
alien power elite. Nor is he helping European Americans
when he fails to inform them about the richness of their
own indigenous European roots that they could draw upon
for strength and cohesion in the battle for survival ahead.At
root, there is a very simple biological explanation behind
America's trend towards unfettered globalism and the police
state within American borders. It all started when WASP's
once ran this country in the 19th century and created the
highly prosperous infrastructure of universities and "home
garage middle class tinkerers" that promoted scientific
and technological advancement. They also created political
institutions that protected individual liberty. Much of
this was based upon the innate individualism of Nordic or
closely related Celtic peoples like the Puritans, Anglo-Saxons,
Scandinavians, Scottish, and Scots-Irish. These peoples
are noted for their legendary "Faustian spirit"
that glorifies scientific as well as geographic exploration.Then
in poured Catholics and Jews from stagnant, corrupt societies
in Southern and Eastern Europe. Initially, they all felt
profound inferiority complexes in the face of impressive
WASP achievements, where America once led the world in inventiveness
and was on track to have a greater industrial base than
France, Germany, and Britain combined. The Catholics and
Jews engaged in "adaptive mimicry," assuming enough
WASP values (superficially at least) to aid their rise to
the top. Over time, they incrementally exploited their political
(and even criminal mafia) organization to edge more individualized
WASPs out of the strategic power bases of American society.Flash
forward today, and Jews and Catholic are so firmly in the
saddle that they think they have everything under control
(we even have a Jewish-Catholic head of the Orwellian-sounding
"Department of Homeland Security" named Janet
Napolitano), and WASPs are a dispensable commodity that
can be sneered at, marginalized, and even disposed of. Catholics
and Jews now take for granted the subtle "loose-tight"
temperamental characteristics more commonly found among
WASP's ("loose-tight" --a term frequently used
in In
Search of Excellence by Waterman and Peters --
involves a talent for sophisticated and meticulous long
range technological and operational planning combined with
a fine balance between decentralized individual initiative
and self-restraint combined with an innate chivalrous sense
of loyalty to the "common good") even though they
themselves lack this fine balance of innate temperamental
characteristics. "Adaptive mimicry" has now been
replaced by "chip-on-the-shoulder" arrogance,
and the innate crookedness of Jews and innate authoritarianism
of Catholics has worked its way to the surface. We now see
the same shameless "rent-seeking" and "feather-bedding"
mentality in bloated federal bureaucracies (disproportionately
filled with Jews and Catholics) that exploit the phony "War
on Terror" that Americans once saw in spades in a much
earlier era in American history with "Jewish
lightning" in Brooklyn, "Kosher Nostra"
racketeering in Las Vegas, and vulgar grubbing Irish Catholic
"patronage" political machines in Chicago. Not
surprisingly, as WASP's are being liquidated through their
low reproductive rates, and inability to defend their ethnic
as well as geographic "territory," America is
assuming all the stagnant and corrupt characteristics of
the societies that many Catholics and Jews originally came
from in the 19th century. America increasingly looks more
like southern Italy, back alley Dublin, and Israel (rated
by many sources as more corrupt than most European countries)
and less and less like Scandinavia and Merry Olde England.Jewish-Catholics
like Janet Napolitano continue to shamelessly grab for more
and more power. They continue to use the Federal government
to spread across America even more Roman
Catholic-style totalitarianism -- to include indefinite
detention of Americans without charge or trail -- more
Jewish-style
criminal-gangsterism, and more Southern Italian-style
mafia/"Federal
Family" cronyism. They continue to kick WASPs when
they are down -- and think they can get away with it! Please
see my Oslo-Utoya
7-22 web page where I provide a transcript
from the 21 Oct 2011 Alex Jones show where Jones calls Napolitano
"Janet the Troll," "Witch," "Monster,"
"Anti-American Pig," "Magic Weasel Fairy,"
and "Jack-booted Little Miss Hitler." Next, see
the 27 Oct 2011 article DHS
Napolitano Knew About Fast and Furious In 2009
by Paul Joseph Watson, infowars.com, the 8 July 2011 article
US
Government Openly Admits Arming Mexican Drug Gangs With
30,000 Firearms, beforeitsnews.com, and Ron
Paul: Fast & Furious a Criminal False Flag
by Kurt Nimmo, Infowars.com, December 13, 2011. The "Fast
and Furious" affair was vastly bigger, more cynical
and sinister than any kind of routine police "sting
operation" gone awry. In all likelihood, it involved
high level Mossad-CIA-MI6 international drug traffickers,
allied with the Jewish-ADL and the Napolitano-DHA-Eric Holder
nexus in a conscious campaign to rob Americans of their
Bill of Rights. There is strong evidence that high level
malefactors were arming Mexican drug gangs as part of a
false flag operation meant to discredit American gun owners
and ultimately take away their Second Amendment rights.
Mexican drug criminals have been killing hundreds of U.S.
law enforcement personnel along the border states courtesy
of this kind of covert support. Next, on
my
Oslo-Utoya 7-22 web page, I discuss Napolitano's
potential as a latter-day Robespierre while furthering the
Jewish-Catholic takeover of America, to include the eventual
liquidation of the legacies of both the American Revolution
and Protestant Reformation. Last, but not least, please
visit my Fukushima
web page, "Aerial
Dance of Mass Death" series and Leuren
Moret archive on global radiation depopulation
to appreciate how people like Barack Hussein Obama II (I
am talking about the individual charged with using a fraudulent
Connecticut Social Security number, aka "Barry
Soetoro" or whatever his real name is), Janet "Big
Sis" Napolitano, and "Billary" Clinton have
criminally aided and abetted one of the greatest and most
treasonous genocidal campaigns in history by deliberately
refusing to alert the American public about the seriousness
of the ongoing Fukushima radiation threat and the need for
all Americans to take strenuous protective measures -- all
of which is based upon reactor melt-downs very likely triggered
by Mossad-CIA's Stuxnet virus. It is worth reemphasizing
that it is likely that tens of millions of Americans will
suffer significantly shortened life spans, not to mention
impaired health and mutilated DNA that will cripple all
future generations -- because the aforementioned individuals
and their handlers felt that it was politically expedient
to keep Americans in the dark. In
the long run, social analysis is really fairly simple. As
the Jewish British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli once
observed in the 19th century, "In the long run, it
is all racial." (Check out the "Bioresponse"
chart elsewhere on this web page created by Harvard professor
Edward Wilson where he conceptualizes "group genetic
response" as a "Log 10 [seconds]" mathematical
evolutionary function across time). Human
tribalism and innate differences in productivity between
human groups are fundamental facts of life that will never
go away. In the long run, it is far wiser to deal with these
things out in the open than to try to suppress them. In
fact, by allowing Jews and Catholics to engage in "adaptive
mimicry" to get the upper hand over them, one might
say that WASP's "trained the dog to bite them."
Worse yet, they have allowed Jewish-controlled media monopoly
allied with forms of government coercion to forcefully integrate
WASPs with Jews and Catholics so thoroughly throughout all
areas of American society that Catholic and Jewish deficiencies
are now WASP problems, whether WASPs deserve these problems
or not on their own. When Jews and Catholics do insanely
criminal, authoritarian, or stupid things and go down, they
automatically pull WASPs down with them. In retrospect,
it was incredibly foolish for WASPs to expose the fate of
their children and all future generations to the shaky results
of anarcho-libertarian "dog training" applied
to alien peoples.All
this having been said, as an individual who has tried his
own hand at creating documentary films, and understanding
how very hard it is to produce and distribute professional-quality
works with so many Jewish gate-keepers manning the strategic
choke-points of film distribution, I can respect Alex Jones'
achievements in this area. In fact, I can go a step further.
Despite all the anarcho-libertarian ideological blind spots,
and other problems and limitations addressed in this piece,
I like Alex Jones enough to listen to him a lot, subject
to personal caveats and reservations filed away in the back
of my mind that make him, like Ron Paul and other libertarians,
"necessary but not sufficient" and a form of "limited
hangout." In other words, listening to Alex Jones is
like eating a delicious but boney fish. As long as you can
separate the good meat out from the bones so that you do
not get them stuck in your throat, it is good eating. One
of the things that I can like about Jones is that I believe
that for Americans who have been raised in sheltered homes
(to include Scandinavian-Americans like myself with their
reputation for "Nordic naïveté"),
Jones can be good at smelling intrigue and explaining how
evil people think. He knows how to "think kinky,"
detect black ops, and smell double and triple agents. He
is even good at discerning knuckle-brained, "power-tripping
control freaks" at lower levels. As they say in New
York City, one has to become "street smart" and
read the "wise guys." And indeed, with the decline
of the WASP, there are quite a few highly psychopathic,
punk wise guys and other types of mafia-criminal-sleazy-greasy
evil people in high places these days. For naive Americans,
Jones is like a "half-way house" or a good initial
toe in the water regarding many important suppressed realities.Interestingly
enough, in his November 2010 broadcasts Alex Jones himself
repeatedly commented that he is beginning to find new respect
for Glenn Beck and
Michael Savage
because they are finally showing the courage to come out
in the open and alert the public to possible false flag
attacks that could be staged by the government. Alex Jones
believes that he made an important contribution by moving
mainstream media closer to himself.I
find it hard to come down too hard on Alex Jones because
I think he has a valid point here. In fact, given all the
paradoxical and Kafkaesque twists and turns of the "Info
War," it is possible that some Jews are blasting Jones
as being heavily "Jewish connected" not because
they feel that Jones is spreading too much disinformation,
but rather because as a "Jewish connected" renegade,
Jones may actually be waking too many gentiles up. One way
to try to unfairly discredit Jones among the gentile Right
is to emphasize his "Jewish connections."In
the Kafkaesque, fractured world of Jewish intrigue, it is
possible that "all of the above" is true, namely
that Jones is simultaneously sprinkling bits of disinformation
here and there while going too far (from the Jewish perspective)
in waking people up in certain other areas at the same time.
He is like hedge fund manager who is both long and short
different sectors of the market at the same time, running
a complex juggling act. He claims on air that he is trying
to spread as much truth as possible while at the same time
braving the risk of getting assassinated. Ultimately, he
insists, "This is not a game." He is not doing
this for his health.It
is quite possible that given the constraints that Alex Jones
is operating under (to include evidence that both he and
his wife have some Jewish ancestry, as well as constraints
placed on him by his business backers), that Alex Jones
is sincerely trying to do the very best he knows how to
constructively address the horrible situation that he finds
America in today, and that he really is risking his life
and fortune. I personally view sizing up Alex Jones as a
complex issue, and the best I can do is present different
viewpoints in this section. I believe all these
viewpointshave merit..I
fully agree with Jones on that point, namely that the "Info
War" is deadly serious with huge stakes. As previously
mentioned, a prime example involves the way mainstream media
in Japan, the U.S., Europe and elsewhere have masked the
strong possibility that Fukushima is now the greatest man-made
catastrophe in human history -- and have routinely failed
to warn people about basic measures to protect themselves
from dangerous fallout. (Again, please see my Fukushima
catastrophe overview page, which explains the
strong likelihood that the melt-downs were mainly precipitated
by Mossad-CIA-MI6's Stuxnet virus, and my "Aerial
Dance of Mass Death and Genetic Destruction" Week-by-week
Fukushima radiation and fallout projections and companion
articles that provide a visual as well as textual
background on the extreme seriousness of this crisis).I
hasten to add that I also like to listen to Daryl
Bradford Smith, Rev. Ted Pike, Jeff Rense, Dr. Paul
Craig Roberts, Gov. Jesse Ventura, the late Dr. Murray Rothbard
and other "anarcho-libertarians" listed in this
section. I addition, I listen to John Stadtmiller, Michael
Collins Piper, Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson, Kevin Strom,
the late Dr. William Pierce, and other more paleoconservative
folks listed in the "nationalist" section below.
Taken all together, I think they are all helping to lead
America back in the Right direction (pun intended).Links:
Articles archives and video links at: Prisonplanet.com,
prisonplanet.tv,
infowars.com.Genesis
Communications Network: Alex
Jones home page and MP3
archive.
Honorable mention at Genesis Communications Network also
include:Webster
Tarpley's World Crisis Radio. Tarpley is a
foremost expert on false flag attacks, geopolitics, and
macroeconomic crises. However, he has an infatuation with
FDR and the New Deal and a dislike for the Mises Institute
and libertarian perspectives on economics that is troubling
for many individuals like myself who lean towards paleoconservatism
and nationalism. Tarpley is also anti-racialist. Nevertheless,
in other areas I respect Tarpley as a gold mine of valuable
information and insights. Erskine
Overnight. Erskine interviewed this author
and Capt. May about the swine flu epidemic. Other
Sources: If "Hollywood
Is Owned by the Arabs" is too much for
you to stomach, but you still want to stay on the libertarian
side that avoids racial nationalist interpretations but
still exposes Zionists and other corrupt power elites, consider
Daryl Bradford Smith at the French Connection at iamthewitness.com.
He has interviewed a lot of good people with a variety of
valuable viewpoints -- such as Michael Collins Piper, Bill
Murphy of GATA, John Kaminski, Jim Condit, and the late
Eustace Mullins.Additional
Update References:
2012-12-06 COINTELPRO
Crash and Burn: Alex Jones, Mike Adams and Mark Dice are
all in full damage control mode by Hatrick
Penry
2012-11-17 Operation
Hoodwink and the Alex Jones Secession Hoax by
Hatrick Penry
2012-10-17 Hatrick
Penry: I’m calling out The Intel Hub, NaturalNews
and PrisonPlanet by Hatrick PenryIts
only 3 weeks to the 2012 election and the controlled opposition
alternative media outlets have done their job: they have
hidden the substance and implications of the NRC FOIA documents
pertaining to Fukushima and the radioactive plume and fallout
that has killed over 40,000 Americans now.Please
read the sample of writing below. When these propaganda
outlets do speak of the NRC FOIA documents (would they speak
of them at all if I had not written multiple articles accusing
them of not writing about it?) it is only in passing and
they never highlight or showcase the scandal that should
have cost Obama the reelection. Don’t let them get away
with this!!!“The
audio transcripts and email, even though redacted and full
of ‘inaudible’ parts at the most convenient times, still
reveal the inner workings of the cover-up and a vast multi-agency
conspiracy. This, more than anything else, they want to
hide. Think of whom all is implicated in the FOIA documents:
DOE, NRC, DHS, FEMA, USAID, CDC, White House, GE and others…perhaps
even the President, for how could he have not known? Obama
is either involved, conspired against and lied to by these
agencies or just a complete buffoon; but one of the three
is our reality and NONE of them are good.How
could Obama not have known of the fallout and its consequences?
How can the President of the United States NOT know or not
be informed about the REAL effects of the greatest industrial
accident of our time, an accident that happened on his watch?Plume
Gate, all things considered, is the Achilles heel of this
administration in that it is a cover up involving the deaths
of thousands of Americans, perhaps 3-5 times as many as
9/11, yet unlike the controversy surrounding the ‘inside
job’ theory of 9/11, we have proof of their foreknowledge
in the FOIA documents. Once the public at large is made
aware of this fact, could it bring an end to Obama’s reelection
chances?”~from
Operation Mockingbird Style Alternative Media Infiltration100%
proof Alex Jones sheilds Obama from consequences of Plume-Gate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unn9sOOyBjMOperation
Mockingbird Style Alternative Media Infiltration Exposed!!!http://hatrickpenry.wordpress.com/2012/03/09/blockbuster-alternatiive-media-s&#8230;..[Editor's
Note: Please see this article for its listing of many other
valuable references]
2012-10-03 Expose
Alex Jones Week: Hatrick Penry on the Alternative Media
Infiltration by Hatrick Penry
2012-08-13 Top
Ten Reasons why Plume-Gate and the NRC FOIA Transcripts
pertaining to Fukushima are being suppressed
by Hatrick Penry (pen name for Tony Muga) Not
long after I wrote about the NRC FOIA Documents pertaining
to Fukushima and the vast multi-agency conspiracy to hide
the radioactive plume and fallout from American citizens,
I realized that alternative media was, for the most part,
avoiding the subject. I had been a huge fan of Alex Jones
for several years, even paying for a subscription to PrisonPlanet,
but when I considered how big this conspiracy was and the
number of deaths involved, I knew something was terribly
wrong when Mr. Jones and his organization remained silent
on the matter. I had never written for the alternative media
before and just assumed it was everything I had imagined
it to be. I thought they reported on all the difficult subjects
that the mainstream would not. Boy was I wrong.I
wrote ‘Plume-Gate
Shocker: Media Silence Raises Troubling Questions’ when
I realized that InfoWars and PrisonPlanet had no intention
of reporting on this blockbuster story, even though I had
sent them all the information, links to specific NRC FOIA
documents, and a copy of my article.I
haunted the AlexJones Channel on YouTube, posting links
to my article and pointing out that InfoWars wouldn’t touch
the NRC Fukushima FOIA transcripts with a 100 foot pole.
Finally, in desperation, I wrote ‘Alex Jones Troll
Den/Shill Network Exposed!!!’ and it was picked up by Alexander
Higgins, re-titled ‘Operation
Mockingbird Style Alternative Media CIA Infiltration Exposed!!!’,
and published on his blog...
2012-06-18 Fumbling
on Purpose: why is PrisonPlanet sweeping Plume-Gate under
the Rug? by Hatrick Penry
2012-06-17 Alex
Jones Surges Past Jon Stewart, Piers Morgan, For Shill-of-the-Year
by Hatrick Penry
2012-06-02 The
Protocols of Zion and the Alex Jones Hoax Pt2
by Hatrick Penry
2012-05-25 Plume-Gate
Author Speaks about PrisonPlanet Removing his Name from
Quote by Hatrick Penry
2012-02-19 10
Reasons Why Radio Host Alex Jones Is The Most Dangerous
Man In America, by David Chase Taylor
2012-02-16 Alex
Jones Cancels Speaking Tour 3 Days After Exposure As Possible
STRATFOR Double Agent - Report, by David Chase
Taylor.
2011-08-23 Alex
Jones, Mike Adams and the 9/11 Litmus Test.
[Rense.com]
2011-07-29 Alex
Jones Connection to Project Mockingbird through Pat Buchanan
and Thomas Braden, rumormillnews.com
2011-03-09 Tom
Metzger on Alex Jones, money, right wing, middle east (video)
(9:08)
2011-01-21 Alex
Jones discussion by Dr. David Duke and Tom Sunic
(video)
1969 Dr.
Revilo P. Oliver: After 50 Years - The National Youth Alliance
(video) (1969) (36:27), uploaded 2011. Although
this film was made well before Alex Jones' time, Dr. Oliver's
references to failed patriot movements since the 1920's
provides a valuable historical perspective. It makes one
wonder if Jewish supporters behind the scenes for Alex Jones
deliberately want him to lead another "Paul Revere"-type
movement of only limited effectiveness, similar to the movement
by that name in the 1920's described by Dr. Oliver.
[undated] Alex
Jones exposed
[undated] zioncrimefactory.com,
Alex Jones search link Here.MP3
links
2012-12-06 Hatrick
Penry show: Molly-Gate, Mark Dice, Tia Tequila, Mike Adams
and Alex Jones
2012-11-27 Hatrick
Penry show: The Alex Jones Stratfor Connection
2012-11-16 Hatrick
Penry show: Operation Hoodwink and the Alex Jones Secession
Hoax

...If
Kagan is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than 2 percent
of the U.S. population, will have 33 percent of the Supreme
Court seats.Is
this the Democrats' idea of diversity?But
while leaders in the black community may be upset, the
folks who look more like the real targets of liberal bias
are white Protestants and Catholics, who still constitute
well over half of the U.S. population.Not
in living memory has a Democratic president nominated
an Irish, Italian or Polish Catholic, though these ethnic
communities once gave the party its greatest victories
in the cities and states of the North.
What happened to the party of the Daleys, Rizzos and Rostenkowskis?And
not in nearly half a century has a Democratic president
nominated a white Protestant or white Catholic man or
woman.

Irish and Italian Catholics once provided the political
backbone for Jews on their rise to power in the big cities
like New York, Chicago, Boston, and Los Angeles. They also
provided the "interface" between the WASP world
and Jewish world by shilling for Jews in Jewish-controlled
major media to help keep WASPs in the heartland bamboozled.
The following article "Irish
American Solidarity" describes how the
Irish Catholics used very different tactics to get ahead
in America compared to more individualistic WASPs such as
English Americans, Scottish Americans, and Scandinavian
Americans.

No European ethnic group exhibited a stronger degree of
ethnic solidarity in the United States than Irish Catholics.
In politics, Irish Catholics were consistent supporters
for the Democratic party from the 1840s onward. As recently
as 1964, the Democratic presidential candidate, Lyndon
B. Johnson, received 78 percent of the Irish Catholic
vote.
In the economic sphere, Irish Catholics, more than any
other European ethnic group, emphasized economic solidarity,
collective action, and politics as keys to improving their
economic position and resisting discrimination. Instead
of emphasizing individual upward mobility, many Irish
men found work in more egalitarian situations, on labor
gangs or construction crews or as longshoremen. Irish
Catholic men were also especially likely to seek government
employment (especially as police officers) or to find
jobs under contractors who held city contracts or in public
utilities, such as street railways. During the 19th century,
Irish Catholics often took the lead in forming and supporting
labor unions.
This high degree of ethnic solidarity reflected both the
discrimination that Irish Catholics faced as well as their
belief that their job security and economic well-being
depended on ethnic unity in the face of hostility from
the nation's Protestant majority. From the early nineteenth
century onward, Irish Catholics faced recurrent waves
of anti-Catholic sentiment. The evangelical revivals of
the early nineteenth century produced a "No Popery"
movement. A popular children's game was "Break the
Pope's Neck."
Mass Irish Catholic immigration in the mid- and late-1840s
led to the rise of the viciously anti-Catholic Know Nothing
party, which drew support from many native-born white
workingmen. But anti-Catholicism was not confined to a
particular social class.Anti-Irish
Catholic sentiment could also be found in the liberal
press of the late-nineteenth century, especially through
Harper's Weekly, where anti-Catholic fervor was particularly
intense during the 1870s. Articles in liberal magazines
claimed that Irish Catholics were more loyal to the Pope
than other Catholic immigrants, and were hostile toward
democracy. Liberal opinion was particular worried by late
19th century papal pronouncements against liberalism and
modernism, especially the declaration of the doctrine
of Papal infallibility.Republicans
regarded Irish Catholics as a core constituency of the
Democratic party. They associated Irish Catholics with
corrupt urban political machines, like New York's Tammany
Hall.The
Progressive era saw yet another wave of anti-Catholic
sentiment. In 1914, Florida's Governor, Sidney J. Catts,
claimed that the Pope planned to invade the state. The
state legislatures in Michigan and Nebraska debated constitutional
amendments banishing parochial schools.The
1920s witnessed a renewed outburst of anti-Catholic sentiment.
Legislatures in the South, Midwest, and West, influenced
by the staunchly anti-Catholic Ku Klux Klan, sought to
require daily Bible readings from the Protestant version
of the Bible.As
late as 1960, anti-Catholic sentiment was still strong
enough to threaten John Kennedy's presidential candidacy.
But the Pope's visit to the United States in 1986 demonstrated
a decisive decline in the prevalence of anti-Catholic
sentiment in the United States. The Papal visit was celebrated
as a symbol of the spread of religious tolerance in the
United States.

A few Catholics like Rev.
Charles Coughlin were willing to speak out in the 1930's
against runaway Jewish power, but he eventually shut up
on orders from his Detroit Archbishop in the early 1940's,
just as WASPs feared. After all, the Vatican has a long
history of being infiltrated by the Rothschilds and other
Zionists. (See my discussion of the chapter "Zionist
Spy Inside the Vatican" from The
Judas Goats: The Enemy Within and related topics
in Chapt.
29 of the Mission of Conscience series).Just
as Randolph Bourne once famously observed that "War
is the health of the state," that is, war provides
a perfect environment for a central government to become
ever more centralized, similarly the rise of neo-Jacobin
federal government and the welfare-warfare state in the
20th century (or what historians Harry Elmer Barnes and
Gore Vidal have called "Perpetual War for Perpetual
Peace" in book titles) ended up being very good for
the upward social mobility of both Jews and Catholics and
America --often at WASP expense. It is probably fair to
say that both Jews and Catholics acquired vastly more prestige
through their "liberal minority coalition" partnership
-- culminating in JFK's "Camelot" -- than if either
group had continued to be viewed by WASPs according to Old
World norms. Many
Catholics continue to serve the Jewish agenda to milk the
old "liberal-minority coalition" political formula
to death, even though by now they have pretty much killed
the WASP golden goose that once laid golden eggs. The old
"welfare-warfare" political formula includes supporting
the perpetual phony "War on Terror" (see Chapt.
7 and Chapt
12 of my Mission of Conscience series), despite
the fact that leading Jewish psychopaths (a redundancy)
have largely discarded Catholics as "useful idiots,"
just as they have now completely discarded Muslim and Christian
Palestinian communities that once supported Jews as they
were building up their beachhead in Palestine in the early
to mid-20th century. I
learned as a former stock broker that in the very long run
high flying stocks and industries always return to historical
norms regarding what they are really worth based upon real
cash flow generating power and real assets, and the same
is true in a kind of "ethnic market" that is the
psychological analog to the "stock market." The
phony "War on Terror" may help postpone the day
of reckoning for both Jews and Catholics, but eventually
public perceptions will cycle back towards Old World norms.
The psychological "ethnic market" will some day
"price into their stock" the fact that the liberal-minority
coalition took a 90% white and mostly WASP country with
the largest and most prosperous industrial base and some
of the greatest individual freedom in the world in the mid
to late 19th century, and converted it into a soon-to-be
majority nonwhite Third World economic basket case and authoritarian
police state in a little over a century. Some day WASPs
in America (what few are left) will probably go back to
viewing most Irish Catholics in America in a manner that
is a lot closer to the way the English middle class and
Northern
Ireland Protestants viewed Irish Catholics in Ireland
in the mid-19th century than the way most Irish Catholics
are viewed by most Americans in America today. Without
question Buchanan is brilliant and well-researched. The
bad news is that he is only willing to push the envelop
so far against conventional wisdom offered by mainstream
media. His works still edit out considerable direct criticism
of Jews and identification of their central role in many
historical events. His policy of incrementalism and cautious
and carefully measured approaches towards dispensing "truth"
to the public is a trade off. On the one hand, by diluting
his message, he can get important messages past Jewish gatekeepers
to broad audiences. By acting as a "kosher conservative,"
he hopes to sustain some form of "conservatism"
through thick and thin in hopes of never making Jewish media
moguls and other plutocrats mad enough to want to destroy
everything. On the other hand, by not telling the full story,
people may wake up too late to be able to effectively face
various grave dangers. In addition, Buchanan only tends
to go on "limited offensives" once he is convinced
the public mood has changed to the point that it is relatively
safe. The
big problem with the appeasement and incremental approach
is that once Jews get completely out of control, as they
did with Russians following the Bolshevik Revolution, or
with Palestinians upon creation of the Jewish State of Israel,
they themselves practice daring (as in "chutzpah")
and forms of "total war" (as in "cultural
Marxism," "affirmative action" forms of slow
anti-white marginalization and genocide, and other approaches).
In the "Info War," it takes at least a "maneuver
warfare" tactician to decisively defeat Jewish "Mongols
of covert 4th generation warfare." (Please go to Chapter
38 where I discuss "Principles of Info War,"
and search the web page for the key word "Mongols.")
Using
William S. Lind's four generations of warfare paradigm as
an analogy, Buchanan's mentality is heavily "Second
Generation." Using a World War II analogy, he reminds
me of British Gen.
Bernard Montgomery who only tended to advance in limited
offensives once he had a clear 2:1 or 3:1 superiority in
man power and fire power (combat power) in set-piece battles
compared to someone like a Gen.
Douglas MacArthur, Gen
George S. Patton, Gen
Field Marshall Erwin Rommel, or Generaloberst
Heinz Guderian who were much more mentally geared towards
audaciously and opportunistically striking their enemies
on the flanks or making deep pincer envelopments to collapse
the enemy from the rear forward (the basic blitzkrieg concept
as an example of third generation "maneuver warfare").So
far Buchanan has given no inkling that Jews are a significantly
in-bred gene pool with a high percentage of psychopathic
and Neanderthal-type
people for whom there is absolutely no limit to how much
evil they can commit or the depths of ugliness they will
sink to until someone finally brings them in check. Nor
has Buchanan made much effort to lay out clear differences
in ethnic spirit and innate mentality between contending
groups in America. In the 19th century, when WASP's set
the tone for America with the Protestant work ethic, the
spirit of America promoted innovation, craftsmanship, savings,
prudent investment, and the production of real and useful
things, consistent with the ancestral patterns of northern
European peoples. In
the 20th century, after Jews used their mafia networking
talents to shove all other groups aside at the top and increasingly
set the tone for the country, America increasingly became
a corrupt nation of rent-seekers
from top to bottom and from sea to shining sea, not a whole
lot different from the "anything for a buck" transactional
mentality of Jews addicted to "schlepping (peddling)
schmatta (things)."Other
"pillars" of this "New America" have
included Jewish hucksters like Bernie
Madoff, Alan
Dershowitz, Elie
Wiesel, Larry
Silverstein, Mike
Milken, Jonathan
Pollard, Andy
Fastow... (the list is endless!) for whom posturing
or "chutzpah" is everything. Let us not forget
another great contribution of the self-Chosen bearers of
"fossil"
civilization, namely the attitude of Jewish
mafia in ancient Babylon that it was always better to figure
angles than ever engage in physical labor. (Physical labor
is prohibited for Jews in the Talmud. For more on these
and other exotic
traits, please see my discussion of Jewish criminal
totalitarian psychopathology in the "parasitism"
section of my mutualism vs. parasitism article. This should
help readers who have never had personal contact with Jews
better understand how "rent-seeking"
comprises the center of gravity of the Jewish way of life.
Furthermore, it should become easier to understand how high
level Jews have always operated as a kind of "CIA in
search of a country," and how Jews tend to infect countries
with values that serve themselves at the expense of their
hosts as they rise in power and influence.)I
suppose for certain descendants of Irish Catholics, particularly
the more primitive "shanty Irish" types with some
possible admixture of Neanderthalism
(quite a few Shanty Irish actually have a simian
appearance as reflected in the cartoon to the right,
which includes the small forehead and receding chin. See
also the "balanced from the bottom up" 19th century
cartoon depicted in
Chapter 34. Lastly, the study guide The
Irish Famine, 1.3 MB PDF download, has a section
with numerous 19th century quotes and cartoons that compare
Shanty Irish to apes and other primitive relatives of homo
sapiens) it was not worth making much of a distinction
between either "Anglos" or "Jews." Quite
a few of these "primitives" hate all "Anglos"
with a passion because of the very unfortunate Irish experience
for centuries under British occupation. While
they perpetually wallow in self-pity and a sense of victimhood
(although for Irish Catholics it is still nothing compared
to the high art practiced by Jews with their "Holocaustianity"
and other religions of professional "victimhood"
and "self-pity"), how many Irish Catholics are
willing to admit that they themselves share some blame for
their own predicament, and in the long run they could be
acting self-destructively by fanatically allying themselves
with the "underdog," that is, Jews, Blacks, Mexicans,
and other "minorities," against "Anglos."
An example of one self-inflicted geopolitical initiative
that embittered Irish-British relations for centuries took
place when Irish leaders invited Spain to use their island
as a staging area for another go at conquering England after
Sir Francis Drake's naval forces defeated the first Spanish
Armada (See Spanish
Armadas and Ireland [pdf] by Hiram Morgan,
National University of Cork). The British became totally
infuriated. They not only systematically hunted down and
killed or captured all the Spanish soldiers in Ireland,
but their determination hardened to fasten a plantation-occupation
system on the Irish to "fix" them for good.We
learn in Final
Judgment that Irish American leader Joe Kennedy
decided to join up with the Jews after World War II so that
one of his sons could become the first Roman Catholic President
of the United States. Kennedy Sr. claimed that he had fought
the Jews in the 1930's an effort to prevent WWII, and certainly
there was no Irish-American who was more aware of the Jewish
role in Bolshevism and other sinister Jewish modus operandi.
Nevertheless, Kennedy Sr. was clearly willing to make a
pact with the Devil to serve Irish-American interests following
WWII at the possible long term expense of the American national
interest. (See "A
Conversation in Hell," mocking Joe Kennedy,
by Jewish writer John Podhoretz, New York Post,
21 July 1999, reproduced in Final Judgment). In
the 1960's, political expediency prevailed once again when
Senator Ted Kennedy, another one of Joe Kennedy's sons,
supported the Jewish ADL initiative to push through the
Immigration Act of 1965 which eventually opened up the floodgates
of Third World immigration into America, which has in turn
led to America's continuing social, political, and economic
slide in the direction of becoming a permanent Third World
hell hole. The April 2003 American Renaissance article "The
Fade to Brown: Immigration and the End of White America"
by Stephen Webster comments:

...If
there is one man who can take the most credit for the
1965 act, it is John F. Kennedy. Kennedy seems to have
inherited the resentment his father Joseph felt as an
outsider in Boston’s WASP aristocracy. He voted
against the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, and supported
various refugee acts throughout the 1950s. In 1958 he
wrote a book, A Nation of Immigrants, which attacked
the quota system as illogical and without purpose, and
the book served as Kennedy’s blueprint for immigration
reform after he became president in 1960.

A
number of traditional American conservatives are also very
upset with Ronald Reagan, who looked "Irish Catholic"
and also acted that way with his slick, glad-handing political
style (earning the nickname "The
Teflon President") even though he was only Irish
Catholic on his father's side and Scots-English on his mother's
side. As noted in the Wikipedia article
on Reagan, he supported an amnesty bill that caused
everything to go from bad to worse in stemming the tidal
waves of illegal immigration:

Reagan
signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act in 1986.
The act made it illegal to knowingly hire or recruit illegal
immigrants, required employers to attest to their employees'
immigration status, and granted amnesty to approximately
3 million illegal immigrants who entered the United States
prior to January 1, 1982, and had lived in the country
continuously. Critics argue that the employer sanctions
were without teeth and failed to stem illegal immigration.
Upon signing the act at a ceremony held beside the newly
refurbished Statue of Liberty, Reagan said, "The
legalization provisions in this act will go far to improve
the lives of a class of individuals who now must hide
in the shadows, without access to many of the benefits
of a free and open society. Very soon many of these men
and women will be able to step into the sunlight and,
ultimately, if they choose, they may become Americans."

Despite
his "All-American" image from his acting roles
involved with football
heroes, "Death
Valley Days" cowboys, and other "Americana"
icons, Ronald Reagan was heavily in bed with Jews all his
professional life, to include Jules Stein and Lew Wasserman
of MCA/Universal, as documented in Dark
Victory: Ronald Reagan, MCA, and the Mob by Dan
Moldea. He also put up a false front in many other ways,
such as failing to act on Grace
Commission Report recommendations to stop runaway national
debt, and instead helping to set new records in the growth
of national debt and government while pretending to be a
pro-limited government conservative Republican. Clearly,
Irish-American envy and resentment of Anglos, combined with
a certain "petty greediness" and peculiar sympathy
for the "underdog" -- no matter how alien -- has
been an important reason for why there has been such a failure
among "counter predators" in America to prevent
psychopathic Jewish "predators" from getting so
completely out of control, particularly in view of insane
Jewish plans to merge all of North America into one country
(the "North American Union" or "NAU")
as part of their global push for one-world government headquartered
in Jerusalem, as I discuss at the beginning of Chapter
23 of my Mission of Conscience series,
or as documented by Alex Jones in Endgame:
Blueprint for Global Enslavement. In
the Reference section of Chapter
8 of my Mission of Conscience series,
I describe an important "race war" dimension behind
9-11 and other false flag attacks orchestrated by Mossad
and their Irish and Italian Catholic minions (such as Rudy
Giuliani of NYC and Richard Daley of Chicago) that ultimately
expresses anti-WASP hatred and Jewish-Catholic takeover
of America:

Getting
back to "Catholics," unlike the early 19th century
period of majority WASP control that repealed three privately
owned and corrupt central banks up through the administration
of President Andrew Jackson (see Chapter
33), the period of substantial "Catholic"
political influence in the 20th century never made any
serious effort to stop the ultimate Jewish power machine
-- the privately controlled and highly corrupt Federal
Reserve Banking System -- since its inception in 1913.
If
one studies the tragic history of Ireland, one discovers
a considerable amount of festering racial and ethnic hatred
by certain Irish Catholics towards "Anglos,"
particular among the more degenerate and Alpinid and Neanderthal
"Shanty Irish" types as opposed to the more
Nordic and Celtic "Lace Curtain" Irish Catholics.
Many southern Italian Catholics -- many of whom show traces
of Negro blood from slave importation during the Roman
Empire or invaders from swarthy areas -- hate "Nordic"
and "Celtic" northern Italian Catholics, and
vice versa. Hollywood
dramatized a hidden "race war" dimension between
different groups of white people in America that involves
many Sicilians as well as Jews and Shanty Irish Catholics
in the movie True
Romance (1993). On a metaphorical level,
it describes out of control organized crime in America
by depicting a Sicilian mafia don who has the nerve to
not only invade the home of a former cop who wears a police
jacket, but also torture him and ultimately shoot him
in the head. Journalist
and political activist John de Nugent wrote in his Dec
2010 blog about "Flying
Squirrels in Norway and Sore Point in Sicily:"

This
is a key clip from the movie “True Romance”
with Christopher Walken playing (in a ludicrous physical
miscasting, using black hair color on top of Germanic
features!), yes, a Sicilian mafia don.(Walken,
to whom in his movie hayday I used to often be compared
physically, is actually pure German; his parents were
both from Hamburg, the great German port city on the
North Sea.)Dennis
Hopper plays a retired cop living alone in a trailer.
The mafiosi burst in and demand to know where his ne’er-do-well,
double-crossing, drug-dealer son is who has betrayed
them.Hopper’s
character decides that, as disappointing as his son
has been, still he loves him enough to not want to betray
his location to these Sicilians out to get him.And
so he provokes Don Vicenzo deliberately with the most
cutting remarks he can possibly utter to him, so as
to avoid further torture for himself and the betrayal
of his son’s whereabouts.This
is a fascinating psychological scene of mental warfare
between two masters of mindwar. Guess who wins?

[John de Nugent's commentary
continued...] Actually,
there is both black and also neanderthal blood throughout
Europe. I have seen it in Germans, Irishmen and Poles
too, way up north.The
Roman Empire brought slaves all over. And this is why
it collapsed before the onslaught in the 300s and 400s
A.D. of the tall, blond, milk-and-meat-drinking, protein-powered,
blue-eyed Germanic tribes. Rome was racially and morally
corrupt, just like the Jewnited Snakes today. And history
will repeat itself.

The
statement by the former policeman character played by
Dennis Hopper that the "Moors were niggers"
is not completely accurate. A "white history"
web
site reacts to this scene by observing:

a) Contrary to the opinion of Tarantino's Afrocentric
friend [a black friend of the filmmaker of True
Romance who gave him the idea that "Negroidal"
Moors altered the Sicilian gene pool for good], the
Saracens [referred to as "Moors" in the film]
were not (predominantly) Negroid.

(b) It is unlikely that most Sicilians ever "were
like the wops in northern Italy. Blond hair, blue eyes."
Sicily had genetic ties to the eastern Mediterranean
and North Africa long before Moors invaded.

It
is worth noting that the racial composition of not only
Sicily, but also North Africa and the Middle East is also
more complicated than the film implies --or current forces
of "political correctness" would have us believe.
Since
ancient times, there have been waves of Nordic-Germanic
peoples who have trickled down to North Africa as either
individuals or have swept down as entire tribes and mixed
in with peoples of North Africa. For example, archeologists
have found quite a few light-skinned, blond-haired mummies
from early Egyptian dynasties (contrary to "politically
correct" histories which give the false impression
that blacks founded and ran Egyptian civilization). Statues
of Hannibal
of ancient
Carthage, or Cleopatra
of ancient Egypt, depict Caucasian people, not Negroes
(contrary, once again, to certain fabricated "political
correctness" histories taught in American schools).
The Berbers of North Africa, who have controlled much
of the caravan trade across the Sahara, have been noted
by certain anthropologists as having many "Indo-European"
(or "Nordic" or "Germanic" or "Aryan,"
take your pick) characteristics, to include "chivalrous"
treatment of women, compared to the more "Neanderthal"
approach of various neighboring Arab tribes who are more
inclined to treat women like chattel. The Wikipedia
article on "Moors" includes "Berbers"
within its definition. Also, many Visigothic (Germanic)
tribes swept into North Africa after the fall of the Roman
Empire. A number of racial historians believe they provided
the racial basis for the existence of blond-haired, blue-eyed
Sultans
and Caliphs
who played a key role behind the "Islamic
Golden Age" or the "Islamic Renaissance"
from the mid-7th century to the mid-13th century A.D.,
which involved the spread of "Algebra" and the
creation of universities from Spain to the Middle East.
There was also another interesting "Nordic"
migration that directly impacted on Sicily in the 11th
and 12th centuries, in which both Sicily and Southern
Italy were
conquered by Normans. The Normans were descended
from Norwegian and Danish Vikings, as well as admixtures
of northern French Celts. However, the Normans set up
a fairly thin ruling class, and I doubt they were able
to have enough sex with enough Sicilian women to shift
the island's entire population towards blond hair and
blue eyes any more than Hopper's alleged "Moorish
niggers" were able to shift everyone towards black
hair and swarthy skin. Speaking
of the Middle East, in places like Syria and Turkey today
one can find pockets of Nordic or Celtic-looking people
whose ancestors came from ancient migrations, or perhaps
even later with the Crusades. "Galatia"
of New Testament fame is one example of such migrations.
It was named after a tribe of Celtic Gauls who migrated
from Thrace in Greece to what is today Turkey during the
during the Third Century B.C., following an earlier Gallic
invasion of the Balkans. Many of these "Gauls"
traced their ancestors from southern France, and who knows
where they came from before that.The
name of the country "Iran" comes from the word
"Aryan" from an ancient era when a much larger
percentage of the population had Nordic and Celtic features
than today based upon numerous migrations from the north.
To this day, many Iranians refer to themselves as "Persians"
and take offense at being confused with "Arabs."According
to The Dispossessed Majority by Wilmot Robertson,
while there are some Negro genetic strains found in various
pockets in Southern Italy and Sicily, these genes probably
comprise less then 5-10% of the total genetic makeup of
certain individuals.(That is, regarding individuals within
stabilized populations that existed before WWII. In the
post war era, Italy has been flooded like most other European
countries with fresh waves of Arabs, blacks, and other
nonwhites). Negro genes that entered European gene pools
centuries ago seem to account for curly hair and somewhat
darker skin among whites today. Wilmot Robertson cites
a genetic study in The Dispossessed Majority
which claims that many Jews have about 10% Negro genes,
which helps account for Jewish curly hair and swarthy
features. The
blockbuster racial case made about the ill effects of
Negro gene absorption into a white European country apparently
has more to do with Portugal than Sicily, as presented
in the online article "The
Black Man's Gift to Portugal" by Ray
Smith (which also appeared on pages 8-9 of Best
of Attack!, cited again elsewhere on this
web page). Smith stated: "What you can see in Portugal
today is the product of uniform, non-selective mixing
of the 10 percent Negroes and 90 percent Whites into one
homogeneous whole. In effect, it is a new race - a race
that has stagnated in apathy and produced virtually nothing
in the last 400 years." Obviously
Hopper's retired cop character was not motivated to make
all these academic distinctions, since the prime purpose
of his foray into racial history was to provoke Walken's
mafia don character into quickly terminating the torture
session "with
extreme prejudice," as intelligence operatives
used to say during the Vietnam era. Regardless
of determining exact genetic percentages in ancestry,
we can still discern enormous stores of anti-"Anglo"
racial hatred in the behavior of certain "Catholics"
like Richard Daley of Chicago and Rudy Giuliani of New
York City, and also in their amazing willingness to form
tight alliances with Jews and continually shill for them.The
closest "Catholics" ever came towards interdicting
the Federal Reserve came under the leadership of Rev.
Charles Coughlin in the 1930's, that is,
until the Catholic hierarchy stopped his political momentum
cold by telling him to shut up. And Rev. Coughlin did
in fact shut up for the rest of his life, with the exception
of writing anti-communist pamphlets. Oh
well, so much for loyalty to American national interests
as opposed to Vatican politics...

A
huge part of this entire tragedy is that so many WASPs have
become so naive, ignorant, and disoriented that they have
allowed other racial and ethnic groups to eat their lunch.
This is also dangerous for Nordic and Celtic Italian Catholics
and Lace Curtain Irish Catholics who would like to ally
themselves with honest WASPs to rebuild an honest, productive
America, but find that so many WASPs have become weak people
that there is little to side with relative to highly organized
Mossad-CIA and other mafia enemies on the other side of
the fence.I
have had plenty of frustration on this score in my own personal
life. For example, during my ten years as a real estate
salesman and broker in New York City (1985-1994), I discovered
that the social reality in America is often very different
than what appears on the surface. As two examples, my real
estate first client was a "kindly Italian American
gentleman" who came into my office and said that he
needed loft space in Queens. Not long after I found him
the space he needed and negotiated and completed the lease
deal, my client's face appeared in the local newspapers
as local mafia chieftain who was arrested for dumping toxic
chemicals in the East River. Welcome to New York City. Then
little bit later I attended a Real Estate Board of New York
lecture series to hear a "kindly Jewish American gentleman"
describe how he became so stunningly successful in real
estate. After his talk was over, I went up to the podium,
and even spent about ten minutes chatting with him to his
face. He was actually very nice and approachable with me,
and I learned a lot of good stuff. Then flash forward a
number of years, and I hear this
very same "kindly Jewish gentleman" telling
a documentary video makers about how he made a decision
to "pull" Building 7 at the World Trade Center
on 9/11. There is very strong evidence that this very same
"kindly Jewish gentleman" also stuck it to insurance
companies for billions, helped lead America into phony wars
that are sucking dry whatever is left of America's economy,
and orchestrated controlled demolition explosions that not
only killed hundreds of firemen and police but also spread
aerosolized asbestos and other toxins to cause the early
deaths of tens of thousands of fellow New Yorkers. In any
event, I watch the videos and think "small world."
But
what really drove me crazy back in the early 1990's took
place when I visited places like Minnesota and Iowa and
tried to discuss the "score" with certain fellow
Scandinavian Americans -- particularly in the pre-9/11 and
pre-Internet era. I would typically encounter social and
political attitudes commonly characterized as "modern
liberal La La Land. " That only made me feel even
more frustrated.The
"thought
crime" episode listed in my author
archive is one example of a situation where I tried
discussing indigenous Nordic religion to help wake up certain
fellow Scandinavian Americans who I view as tragically naive
and misinformed, but it ended up backfiring, thanks in part
to the efforts to convene an unnecessary Board of Inquiry
by a female fellow Norwegian American Marine officer who
was later denounced by my commanding officer as a "stupid
b---- who has been brainwashed."Perhaps
Pat Buchanan's nibblings on the edges have helped stem the
rising tide of corruption and alien takeover in America
a little bit. Maybe. Or then again, perhaps they have been
more "limited hangout" in nature, and have helped
shill for our enemies, and the more correct answer is "maybe
not." Please read Buchanan and decide for yourself.For
more insights, please see "Pat
Buchanan's Double Mind," by Kevin Alfred Strom,
28 Aug 2009.Links:
columns archived at townhall.com,
and also at his home site The
American Cause. Other
References:
2012-06-27 The
New World Order and the Irish-Jewish, Anti-White Alliance
by nyuntermensch
2009-10-26 'De
Valera was a British spy' Book claims national hero
was 'turned' after 1916, "A
NEW book to be published next month makes the shocking claim
that Eamon de Valera, the founding father of the nation,
was under the control of the British.The
book, provocatively titled 'England's Greatest Spy: Eamon
de Valera', suggests that Dev was terrified of being executed
after the Rising and was "turned" in exchange
for his life. For some years afterwards, the book claims,
Dev was under British control......`De
Valera the cowardly, incompetent, mentally unstable officer
who deserted his troops was (later) repackaged as de Valera
the lonely hero fighting valiantly against overwhelming
odds'..."
2008-01-02 Side
by Side: Irish and Jews in American Theater by
Robert F. Moss, forward.com"...Beneath
the surface, ethnic contrasts nourished the comedy. Burns
portrayed the “smart Jew” trying to communicate
with a “goyisher kop.” His perfectly reasonable,
straightforward questions elicited delightfully irrational
answers (“Did the nurse ever drop you on your head
when you were a baby?” “Oh, no, we couldn’t
afford a nurse; my mother had to do it.”). Much of
the subject matter for the humor derived from Allen’s
traditionally large Catholic family (for example, brother
Willy, who slept on the floor to keep his high blood pressure
down). The act worked because Burns was never patronizing
nor cruel, while Allen was always loving and lovable."
2007-10-25 White
Ethnic Politics: Irish and Italian Catholics and Jews, Oh,
My! by Sewell Chan, http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com“Irish
and Italian Catholics and Jews shared the same city streets,
they shared the same institutions, to lots of people they
looked the same,” Dr. Zeitz said. “But they
came at culture and politics from fundamentally different
viewpoints.”At
their height in the mid-century decades, the three groups
numbered, it is estimated, about four million — accounting
for two-thirds of the city’s white population and
perhaps half of the total population."2005-05-03Do
the Irish look like monkeys? asks Christie Davies after
seeing Conquering England - Ireland in Victorian London
at the National Portrait Gallery posted by
Christie Davies

...The Republic of Ireland has always had an ambivalent
attitude to its Protestant community, who in 1910 constituted
a tenth of the population of the 26 counties. They were
a minority to be changed and converted, to come over to
Rome or to emigrate. What amounted to ethnic cleansing
worked. Today only 3% of the Republic's population is
Protestant. Yet, whenever the roll of Irish genius is
called in Dublin, the members of the former Protestant
ruling class are always included, mainly because without
them there would not be much to boast about.

[undated]
Tammany
Hall, en.wikipedia.org "Tammany Hall,
also known as the Society of St. Tammany, the Sons of St.
Tammany, or the Columbian Order, was a New York City political
organization founded in 1786 and incorporated on May 12,
1789 as the Tammany Society. It was the Democratic Party
political machine that played a major role in controlling
New York City and New York State politics and helping immigrants,
most notably the Irish, rise up in American politics from
the 1790s to the 1960s."[undated]
The
Irish in America: 1840's-1930's; "Micks",
"Paddys" & "Bridgets"; The Facts,
virginia.edu[undated]
Irish
President De Valera was a British spy (Jewish spy)
[Ed. Note: This thread contains some fascinating insights
into how both the 19th century Irish potatoe famine and
the 20th century Irish Independence movement may have been
manipulated by Jews. Reading between the lines, the Rothschild/City
of London Jewish establishment probably aided the Irish
Independence movement behind the scenes to enhance support
by Irish Catholics in the United States for the Jewish-Catholic
and Liberal-Minority Coalition takeover of America].[undated]
Irish
Crypto deValera, Michael Collins and Liam Neeson: 1 Traitor,
2 Besieged Nationalists. More interesting insights.

Contrary to the image created by this Time
cover, Buchanan has been mostly a "kosher conservative"
for the establishment

"DYNAMIC
DUO: George Burns and Gracie Allen capitalized on
their ethnic differences, with Burns playing the
“smart Jew” trying to communicate with
Allen’s [Irish Catholic] ‘goyishe kop.’"
from 2008-01-02 Side
by Side: Irish and Jews in American Theater by
Robert F. Moss, 2 Jan 2008, forward.com

Dr.
Ralph Raico is a professor of European history
who has specialized in "the history of liberty, the
liberal tradition in Europe, and the relationship between
war and the rise of the state."He
does an excellent job of making an analogy between the benefits
of political decentralization following the collapse of
the Western Roman Empire, and the virtues of business decentralization
that result in smaller and more entrepreneurial companies.
In other words, breaking apart empires has analogous advantages
on a political level to breaking apart conglomerates on
a business level, as explained by Thomas J. Peters and Robert
H. Waterman in their classic work In
Search of Excellence : Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies.
With
more states competing against each other in the Middle Ages,
rulers were under more pressure to avoid overtaxing their
most productive subjects for fear of losing them to competition.
This encouraged lower taxation and more personal liberty
compared to an imperial system. This is certainly a potent
argument for secessionism and the creation and maintenance
of small states as opposed to empires.As
an interesting aside that comments on this issue, I recollect
a guest from Gun Owners of America on the Alex Jones show
who conducted a study which demonstrated an amazing direct
correlation between repressive gun ownership laws and high
taxation in America. The states and cities that do the most
to ban private gun ownership -- a reflection of the most
basic right of personal self defense-- also have the highest
taxes, and vice versa. In the final analysis, personal liberty
involves the result of a tug of war between predators and
counter predators, that is, between individuals vs. the
state, between states vs. the central government, and between
states and competing states. An important reason for the
steadily growing police state control grid in America today
is raw Federal monopoly power over all the states, as well
as too much apathy among the general public in standing
up for its rights. Raico
also does a great job of explaining the full nature of 19th
century classical liberalism, and how the Industrial Revolution
created greater relative material progress compared to most
other periods of history, despite distorted and often politically-motivated
charges about "Dark Satanic Mills" and "worker
exploitation" made by slave-owning, land-rich Tories
(later reinforced by Marxists) against entrepreneurial Whigs
in England, their political competition. Although
he does not explicitly discuss race and ethnicity, he does
not explicitly contradict the role of these things either.
For starters, he has observed that an important social basis
of the American Revolution was the fact that there was relatively
little immigration between 1700 and 1775, and America's
tripled population came mostly from natural increase. Americans
had a sense of rootedness within each colony. They also
had extended kindred ties and retained Old World cultural
values. All of this gave them the social organization, cohesion,
discipline, and sense of purpose necessary on a grass roots
level to successfully combat tyranny.Nor
does Raico explicitly discuss the Jewish phenomenon as a
possible "sociobiological disease" of 19th century
classical liberalism and "empires." In other words,
this was the century in which dynamic European societies
became so liberal for entrepreneurs that they suffered reduced
resistance to dynamic alien intruders. Worse yet, once nations
turn into multi-ethnic or multi-racial empires, ruling elites
become much more reliant on intrigue and intimidation to
hold their power bases together, which in turn makes it
much easier for Jews to parlay their own peculiar strengths
in these areas to rise to the top. In addition, empires
tend to form vast multi-ethnic urban power centers in places
like Rome, London, Paris, Moscow, or New York, which also
throws the Jewish "Briar Rabbit" into the urban
"briar patch," because Jews have always been the
most urban of all peoples and hence power competition in
big cities is always "home turf." In
his historical lectures, Raico explains how Germany and
France were divided up into scores of semi-autonomous provinces
throughout most of the 18th century, and how all of this
rapidly changed into the 19th century. Jews exploited classical
liberalism utilized by de facto imperial social orders to
not only infiltrate the highest levels of power in the 19th
century, but also to quietly build up spectacular financial
power bases and networks, as Michael Collins Piper documents
in The New Babylon. The 20th century became the
era when Jews called in their chips accumulated in the prior
century, stopping at nothing to ruthlessly exploit their
financial power bases, and where their worst Forbidden
Planet-type "Id Monster" fantasies such as
the Soviet state floating in an orgy of gentile bloodshed
became reality for much of humanity. (See "Parting
Thoughts: The Eternal Conflict" by George
Kadar, where he notes: "...The 20th century in the
Western world can be rightfully called the "Century
of the Neanderthal..."). Unfortunately, as America
heads deeper into the police state control grid, this savage
plot is still thickening, with an all too familiar cast
of characters still remaining in the background. Mises
Institute articles
archiveMises
Institute MP3
archive:Lewrockwell.com
articles
archive

Dr. Ralph Raico

Thomas
DiLorenzo is the author of The
Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and
an Unnecessary War (also two follow-on books about
Lincoln, such as: Lincoln
Unmasked and Abraham
Lincoln: Friend of Foe of Freedom), Hamilton's
Curse: How Jefferson's Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution--and
What It Means for Americans Today, and How
Capitalism Saved America: The Untold History of Our Country,
from the Pilgrims to the Present. I
view Thomas DiLorenzo's major contribution as his ability
to popularize longstanding criticisms of modern liberal icons
in a way that is still palatable to today's teeming masses
of P.C.-brainwashed Yuppies. Needless to say, DiLorenzo goes
nowhere near direct criticism of Jews or explicit discussion
of racial and ethnic issues. However, he helps demolish historical
icons that neo-Jacobin "Big Brother" uses to "control
the past in order to control the future." Abe
Lincoln and Alexander Hamilton are two major historical icons
that provide ghostly support for unlimited federal government
and an unlimited private central bank. Dr. DiLorenzo is a
major contributor to the
King Lincoln archive at lewrockwell.com which
serves as an important Ghost-buster on Lincoln-related issues.It
is not that DiLorenzo is saying anything that is particularly
new, it is just that his sources have been gathering dust
on library shelves and ignored by controlled media for too
long. For example, his thesis about Lincoln is consistent
with Shattering
the Icon of Abraham Lincoln by Sam Dickson or The
American Lenin by L. Neil Smith published decades earlier.
One
of best explanations of the Confederate cause I have ever
seen, echoed by Dr. DiLorenzo in his lectures, are contained
in the first chapters of Memoirs
of Service Afloat, During the War Between the States
originally published in 1868 by Admiral
Raphael Semmes, a lawyer who later became commander of
the C.S.S. Alabama, one of the greatest raiders in naval history.
In
my "centralization
vs. decentralization" article, I draw heavily upon
Dr. DiLorenzo's analysis to describe how limited republics
can morph into "ponzi government" by initially following
the "Whig
agenda" and Henry
Clay's "American
System" that DiLorenzo describes for Abraham Lincoln's
policies which favored public works, a central bank, high
tariffs, and other forms of "special privilege."
From here, things can go from bad to worse to where we finally
wind up with "evil government." This stops at absolutely
nothing to keep itself in power, to include false flag attacks,
distractive foreign wars, confiscatory taxation, fascistic
banking-government cartels, the police state, and even genocide
of the very core population it was originally designed to
protect. Does any of this sound disturbingly familiar?Unfortunately
DiLorenzo typically uses the word "nationalism"
with a negative spin in his lectures. He usually conflates
"nationalism" with high tariffs and other features
of Henry
Clay's "American
System" which enhanced the power of the federal government
and awarded disproportionate pork and special privilege to
Northerners. In actuality, there exist alternative forms of
American nationalism, such as "States Rights nationalism"
that seeks to enhance state sovereignty in the face of federal
power, "ethnic grass roots nationalism," which seeks
to enhance the self-sufficiency and self-determination of
ethnic groups at the grass roots as an alternative to government
control, "racial libertarian nationalism," which
uses protectionist measures to maintain racial and ethnic
balance and control within a country without supporting empire,
and generalized "libertarian nationalism," which
imposes only low to moderate tariffs as a least bad form of
taxation, while enjoying national unity provided by some form
of minimum national government. Libertarian nationalism was
the core political philosophy advocated by many leading Southerners
such as Thomas Jefferson and John
C. Calhoun. The
Lincoln brand of highly centralized federal nationalism sought
to jump tariffs from
15% (average in 1857) to over 47%. Given the nature of
trade retaliation, exporters usually wound up paying the same
tariff levels as importers. This wound up hitting Southern
cotton exporters especially hard. With only one third of the
national population, Southerners wound up paying over three
quarters of all federal tax revenues, most of which was spent
in the North. Meanwhile, northern manufacturers fattened up,
since the high tariffs shut out much of their European competition.
DiLorenzo notes
"Southerners clearly understood that they were being
made into tax slaves by the North, and by Lincoln, who announced
in a February 15 1861 speech in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
that `The tariff is to the government what a meal is to the
family.'"DiLorenzo
is such a hardcore anarcho-libertarian that he has pushed
free trade ideology to the maximum in his lectures beyond
even moderate tariffs, as if he is oblivious to the way pure
free trade policies can open up a society to infiltration
by Jewish mafias at the highest levels and proletarian displacement
at the lower levels by complete aliens. Pure free trade policies
can also seriously undermine the ability of the native population
to continually reinvest in strategic industries while retaining
firm control of the strategic bases of society, to include
major media and major money center banks. Besides, in the
real world almost nobody ever practices what they preach about
free trade for a variety of other reasons, to include the
"sociobiological virtue" that charity must begin
at home for any people to survive and prosper in a competitive
world. There are many forms of tangible as well as intangible
"social reinvestment" that has to be continually
maintained, to including rewarding people involved in "idealistic
service professions" such as police, school teachers,
and military reserves, in order for a society to successfully
perpetuate itself. Even on a racial level, whites have to
continually reinvest in fellow whites on all levels in order
for them to survive as a people.The
business that does not continually reinvest in itself as a
first priority eventually goes bankrupt, pure and simple.
The same principle applies on a "sociobiological"
and "ethnic-genetic" level among competing "Evolutionary
Breeding Units" (or "tribes"), as explained
in greater detail by the late British anthropologist Sir Arthur
Keith in his landmark work A New Theory of Evolution.
He even explains the paradox that EBU's have to be selfish
about inbreeding altruistic (or "selfless") genes
in order for such selfless traits to survive.All
of this leads to what I call the "libertarian paradox."
Anarcho-libertarianism is all about a firm belief in the ability
of human reason to triumph in all matters. This in turn implies
faith that rational, scientific procedures can be consistently
applied throughout society. Therefore, if one is scientific
and truthful, one should be able to find sympathetic friends
everywhere. People should respect honest differences of opinion
on pressing social issues so long as one can demonstrate that
one is honest and well-intentioned. People should bend over
backwards to not discriminate even when one comes up with
ideas that may startle or even shock them --so long as one
is playing by ethical libertarian rules. And
now for the real world. The paradox is that if one offers
scientific evidence regarding innate racial and ethnic differences
(see for example my discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian
psychopathology in my "mutualism
vs. parasitism" article, or my discussion of innate
racial differences in my "environmental
vs. genetics" article), it is amazing how many leading
anarcho-libertarians who publicly pride themselves on their
"truthfulness" will suddenly run off and hide somewhere.
They may even avoid transacting on a business level. They
are only willing to go so far in standing up to the forces
of "political correctness." Well,
dear reader, isn't this the equivalent on a personal level
to what nations practice on a broader geopolitical level when
they engage in boycotts, blockades, and protectionism? Nationalism
is essentially a form of "organizing" to protect
group political, economic, and other interests. Any anarcho-libertarian
lecturers at the Mises Institute who might refuse to join
me in an open public discussion of Jewish Neanderthalism,
Holocaustianity,
or Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology are in effect
practicing a negative and perverse form of "nationalism"
on the personal level by boycotting a truthful and open intellectual
discussion. How
dare any of them criticize me for taking a nationalist position
on macro-economic trade issues when they are in effect practicing
a form of "nationalism" -- albeit an ideological
and very negative "political correctness" form of
nationalism that I personally find very distasteful -- on
the street level? The
reality is that people practice both positive and negative
forms of "nationalism" every day in their personal
business and social affairs, so why should we be surprised
if these things are also practiced routinely on a national
economic level? "Nationalism" is too deeply rooted
in human nature to ever be successfully altered on a sustainable
basis by anarcho-libertarian free trade ideology. Man is by
nature a tribal animal and nothing will ever change this underlying
reality. All
this having been said, despite hitting a few foul balls here
and there on free trade and other "anarcho-libertarian
religious icon"-related issues, Dr. DiLorenzo keeps hitting
doubles, triples, and home runs on other topic areas. The
following are some examples:2010-11-06
The
Real Jefferson2010-10-30
The
Most Cynical and Hypocritical Speech Ever Delivered2010-09-22
The
Culture of Violence in the American West: Myth versus Reality2006-09-30
The
Fatherland Protection RacketFor
more DiLorenzo please see:Mises
Institute articles
archiveMises
Institute MP3
archiveLewrockwell.com
articles
archive: The
following is an interesting article written by another author
about Dr. DiLorenzo's work.2011-02-08
Hamilton's
Curse: Root cause of U.S. demise: Bankers sabotaged Constitution
by John Kaminski.

Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo

Dr.
Hans Hermann Hoppe has offered some fresh perspectives
that challenge us to examine actual functions performed by
government agencies, and then ask hard questions about how
the private sector can possibly perform them better. Among
other things, Hoppe examines the role of private incentives
and a sense of long term stakeholdership to motivate optimal
stewardship of operations and resources. In
The
Myth of National Defense Hoppe asks why insurance
companies and private contractor groups cannot perform various
"security" functions better than government agencies.
In his lectures, Hoppe explains how monarchy can serve as
a form of "privately owned government" where rulers
have a long term incentive to reinvest in their fiefdoms,
whereas "social democracy," in which politicians
have no ownership, but instead often focus heavily on manipulating
public appearances to get re-elected, often engage in wasteful
pork spending to make a name for themselves without concern
for the way running up public debt creates a bigger burden
on others. The
good news about Hoppe is that is always beneficial to try
to look under the hood and perform a functional analysis.
After all, government agencies that are left unchecked tend
to grow like cancers --or even worse yet may even co-opt or
take over national media (please recollect
how "The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone
of any significance in the major media." --William Colby,
former CIA Director, quoted by Dave Mcgowan, Derailing
Democracy, and also consider the quote "You could
get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple
hundred dollars a month." --CIA operative, discussing
the availability and prices of journalists willing to peddle
CIA propaganda and cover stories. Katherine the Great,
by Deborah Davis). As Harry Browne observed in Why Government
Doesn't Work, over the long run government agencies have
a strange way of morphing into self-serving monsters that
perform the exact opposite functions for which they were originally
intended. For example, a government that is supposed to protect
the rights and interests of the overwhelming majority of its
electorate who are white citizens may morph into a monster
that serves Israeli/Jewish interests first and makes war on
whites through forced-race mixing programs, false flag attacks,
onerous taxation, and the installation of the police state
control grid. A military establishment that is supposed to
protect a country may instead create "fake Bin Ladens"
to help justify its bloated existence and find new excuses
to feed the military industrial complex.The
bad news is that Hoppe is so "anarcho" that he,
like Dr. DiLorenzo and most other Mises Institute scholars,
are generally unwilling to explicitly incorporate the facts
of life about innate Jewish criminal Neanderthalism,
innate authoritarian passivity of various white ethnic groups,
or greater organic levels of psychological dysfunctionality
(neuroses) of different racial and ethnic groups in America
into their analysis. We
can see this discrepancy on a rhetorical level. As one example,
the phrase "private contractor" is usually highly
revered by libertarians, since libertarians tend to idolize
the private sector and a contractual approach to life. However,
following the Katrina disaster, many residents of New Orleans
began to view the term "private contractor" negatively
after they saw Israeli "private contractors" confiscate
firearms from private citizens. Many American servicemen have
similarly become disgusted with observing how "private
contractors" are used abroad to skirt laws that ordinarily
apply to servicemen, to include the torture of Iraqi children.
Often
it is more the men who make the system than the system that
makes the men. Also, there are important reasons why many
citizen armies have often historically been more effective
than mercenary armies. One of the best forms of long term
caretakership involves a sense of ownership of ones own ethnicity,
race, or culture --which Hoppe does not openly address.Sometimes
government organizations are the least bad alternative to
maintain citizen control and fend off predatory Jewish mafias
than "private" entities gone bad, somewhat analogous
to the "poison
pill defense" that many boards of directors of public
corporations prepare to deter hostile hostile mergers and
acquisitions. This is one reason why many countries insist
on retaining 50% government ownership of mining and other
natural resources-related enterprises whenever outsiders are
involved. Sometimes
"privatization" is used as a smokescreen for covert
Zionist aggression; see for example my series about how Iceland
got "ENRONed" about the nefarious operations
of George Soros, the City of London, the Russian Jewish mafia,
and other aliens. Their brand of "privatization"
severely damaged what was previously a prosperous country.Therefore,
while I think Hoppe has important insights and asks important
questions, I would not take him as the "last word"
on national defense or other government-related issues, but
rather as just a "starting point" regarding "hypotheses"
we need to entertain once we engage in deeper analytical thinking.
Mises
Institute articles
archive.Mises
Institute Hoppe MP3
archiveLewrockwell.com
author
archive.

Dr. Hans Hermann-Hoppe

Dr.
Thomas Woods has done terrific work shattering
many modern liberal historical icons just like Dr. Thomas
DiLorenzo, particularly in regard to examining the history
of colonial America, the role of the anti-Federalists, and
the degradation of the U.S. Constitution over time. He is
the author of The
Politically Incorrect Guide to American History.
Woods assisted Dr. Kevin R. C. Gutzman in The
Politically Incorrect Guide(tm) to the Constitution,
and co-authored with Gutzman Who
Killed the Constitution?: The Federal Government vs. American
Liberty from World War I to Barack Obama. I think
these books are real home runs.According
to Woods, twice during the colonial era, the colonies resisted
creating a central government for North America. Up until
the French and Indian War, the British government was typically
"out of sight, out of mind," and each colony often
conducted its own affairs like a fully sovereign country,
to include issuing its own money, regulating its own economy,
selecting its own government leaders, raising its own armed
forces, protecting its own borders, and deciding against
whom to make war. Significantly, in the Paris Peace Treaty
of 1783 which officially ended the American War of Independence,
the King of England recognized each former colony as a separate
sovereign state.This
is a very profound insight. Americans need to stand back
and really let it sink in. For starters, it shatters the
"Founding Fathers" cult and the "Federal
Government as God" religion, where Americans somehow
feel like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson came down
from the clouds and gave Americans their rights under the
Constitution like Moses coming down from Mt. Sinai with
the Ten Commandments tablets. If
anything, the "Founding Fathers" were really the
"Following Fathers." The states had already proven
themselves completely competent at running themselves before
even the Articles of Confederation were created, not to
mention the U.S. Constitution. They had already developed
their own viable constitutions and parliamentary procedures.
In fact, in the End of Kings William Everdell observes
that America had some of its most honest, effective, and
efficient government during the colonial era. In addition,
America had eight Presidents
of the United States in Congress Assembled under the
Articles of Confederation beginning with John Hanson, so
why is it that in our federalized school system usually
gives children the impression that America was cursed with
weak, dithering, or nonexistent federal leadership prior
to the Washington presidency? Lastly, neither the Constitution
nor Bill of Rights gave Americans any rights, but
rather described the limited powers the people's representatives
gave to government to help protect the rights that they
already had. On top of this, America's overwhelmingly WASP
(highly Nordic-Celtic) population had very strong libertarian
instinctive feelings --embodied in the naturally-evolved
English Common Law-- to back up what George W. Bush would
later call "Just
a G-D piece of paper" -- the kinds of feelings
that have been steadily lost in the population at large
as America has steadily diluted its former WASP majority
with descendants of Neanderthals,
Aztec
cannibals, and other featherless bipeds from around
the world.One
can make a very strong argument that if anything, the states
had already given up too many sovereignty rights under the
Articles of Confederation in order to give the appearance
of a "united front" to attract aid from France
during the American Revolution. Then things went from bad
to worse when many of them agreed to even greater federal
centralization created by the U.S. Constitution. As
Gary North observes in "Conspiracy
in Philadelphia," the motives of the framers
of the Constitution --who actually usurped the Articles
of Confederation-- were not totally pure. The Philadelphia
convention was held in secret under the guise of recommending
amendments to the Articles of Confederation rather than
replacing the entire document. The Constitution also bailed
out bankers who had lent money to individual states during
the Revolution by making the Federal government responsible
for repayment. American citizens had no moral duty to bail
out these lenders who had understood the risks involved
when they originated their loans with individual states.
I
do not have the space here to go into all the main points
made by Gary North or Dr. Thomas Woods here --which are
all well worth your time -- but instead would like to illustrate
how they they have stimulated me to do my own historical
research to uncover the real motivations behind many leading
Federalists.George
Washington is a prime example. I discovered that he was
a major western land speculator who wanted to rapidly develop
his properties with a Federal army. He claimed thousands
of acres near the Battle of the Great Kanawha in 1774 (also
called the Battle
of Point Pleasant) on the West Virginia-Ohio border
that Teddy Roosevelt claims in The Winning of the West
helped start the American War of Independence. The militia
who fought this battle brazenly defied the the British government's
prohibition against expansion across the Appalachian continental
divide. They showed other colonists how they could go man
to man against Indians deep inside the frontier and defeat
the main Indian force defending the Ohio Valley --without
any help from British soldiers. Roosevelt claims this victory
really pumped up colonists psychologically for Lexington
and Concord. An important selling point in Common Sense
by Tom Paine was the idea that if Americans could win their
independence, they would have the wealth of an entire continent
at their disposal and no longer be hemmed in by the Appalachians.
The U. S. Government was born as a speculative real estate
venture partner as well as a limited republic ostensibly
designed to protect rights. Washington
also owned thousands more acres along the main overland
transportation corridor into the Ohio Valley than ran next
to where he was defeated at Ft. Necessity at the inception
of the French and Indian War. One of his first orders of
business as President was to send federal armies into the
Ohio valley to complete the conquest from the Indians. George
Washington also saw some nice personal property appreciation
when he played a key role in relocating the Federal capitol
near his Mount Vernon estate. Alexander Hamilton (probably
a Rothschild agent), who was Washington's right hand man,
wanted to install an American version of the British mercantilist
system that favored big bankers over the people. He also
wanted to create a central bank that could be a valuable
tool for funding federal military operations.Quite
a few contemporaries of Washington had a totally different
view of the man than what is commonly promoted today by
our federalized education system, a prime example being
Benjamin
Franklin Bache, editor of the populist paper The
Philadelphia Aurora and grandson of Benjamin Franklin,who bitterly compared George Washington to Oliver
Cromwell.I
lean in Bache's direction and now view George Washington
as a kind of "Cromwell lite." The analogy is not
perfect by any means, because among other things Cromwell
was a Puritan, whereas Washington was a Deist heavily influenced
by the Enlightenment. In addition, many historians agree
that Washington had many noble character traits that do
not necessarily coincide with Cromwell's personality. However,
there are still some interesting historical "rhymes"
and "echoes." Washington
figured out a way to score eight years as a "U.S. President"
rather than serve as as Cromwell's version of a "Lord
Protector." Still, this beat the term of roughly one
year each served by Presidents of the United States in Congress
Assembled under the Articles of Confederation. Like Cromwell,
Washington loved to lead armies. In fact, he raised raised
a bigger army than the one he had used to win at Yorktown
in an effort to pacify western Pennsylvania whiskey farmers,
and became the only acting U.S. President to lead an army
himself. Washington also worked with apparent Jewish agents.
Cromwell let the Jews back into England after they had been
banned for centuries, and not only borrowed money from them,
but joined with them in foreign plantation ventures. Washington
was cozy not only with the likely
Rothschild/City of London agent Alexander Hamilton,
but was also a Mason. The Masons in America probably functioned
as a front organization for Jewish plutocrats in Britain
much like the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral
Commission, Rhodes Scholars, Bilderberg Group, and other
elite groups that came later. See Chapter
5 for more on these subversive groups, to include the
"ring within a ring" strategy for covert conquest
explained by G. Edward Griffin and Professor Carol Quigley.
The
installation of the U.S. Constitution over the Articles
of Confederation primed America for a fast-growth strategy
to rapidly develop western lands under federal direction
and a federal army. Previously, each colony or state was
responsible for expansion to its immediate west. It also
set up America to get its first privately owned central
bank, a very bad precedent that was finally ended in the
19th century by President Andrew Jackson. For more background
on America's tragic historical experience with privately
owned central banks, please visit Chapter
33: Wall Street Coup de Etat and Banker False Flags Against
America and watch The Money Masters video.
America
grew so fast that the country became overwhelmed by alien
peoples, totally destroying the common social fabric described
in Albion's
Seed by David Hackett Fisher that had helped give
rise to the American Revolution in the first place. As
an aside, it is worth emphasizing that this "social
fabric" not only included extensive kinship ties from
several generations of large families within each colony,
but also important elements of "ethnic historical memory."
For example, in The
Cousins' Wars by Kevin Philips, we learn that nearly
all the inhabitants of New England were descended from Puritans,
who over a hundred years earlier had overwhelmingly supported
the Parliamentary cause against Royalist absolutism in the
English Civil War. Nearly every New Englander could trace
an ancestor who fought on the side of Cromwell and Parliament
against the King and his Royalists. In many ways the American
war against King George III was simply a "continuation
war" that started with the Parliamentary war against
King
Charles I. Similarly,
in The Winning of the West by Theodore Roosevelt,
we learn that before Americans began to serious move westward
across the Appalachians, they first evolved a "pioneer
culture" along the frontier that was disproportionately
Scottish or Scots-Irish in composition. These frontiersmen
also played a disproportionate role in fighting the Revolution,
just like the descendants of English Puritans. The Scots-Irish
were descended from Scottish clans (with some admixture
of Anglo-Saxon and Viking ancestors). They also had bitter
historical memories fighting agents of the British crown
back in the "Old Country," as dramatized in movies
like Braveheart
or Rob
Roy. In the latter case, Wikipedia notes:

In Rob Roy, the Scottish Highlanders and English aristocrats
are portrayed in opposite manners. The Guardian
wrote, "The baddies are English and queer, the goodies
are Scottish and ruggedly hetero." It asserted the
Scottish portrayal as American-driven and referenced a
subplot where one of Rob Roy's men wants to emigrate to
America. In addition, while the film spanned the years
between 1712 and 1722, the
Jacobite Risings (which took place in 1715 and 1719)
go unmentioned.

It
is also worth noting that a Scotsman named John
Paul Jones became "the Father of the U.S. Navy,"
and that fierce Scots and Germans were the only peoples
the Romans could never conquer, resulting in Hadrian's
Wall and the Roman version of the "watch
on the Rhine." After
whites rapidly conquered Indians, Zionists came in from
behind and rapidly conquered fragmented whites. Using the
liberal minority coalition political tactics described by
Wilmot Robertson in The Dispossessed Majority,
many Jewish leaders along with certain Catholic allies like
Senator Teddy Kennedy proceeded to open up the floodgates
of nonwhite immigration in the 1960's, thereby reducing
whites from 90% of the population down to less than 70%
today.Admirers
of George Washington point out that to put rapid westward
expansion policies in perspective, one needs to keep in
mind that Thomas Jefferson, one of America's leading anti-Federalists,
played loose with the Constitution to take advantage of
the Louisiana
Purchase. That was every bit as aggressive as Washington's
fixation on conquering the Ohio and Indiana Territories
with a federal army, funded by a central bank. To a large
extent, these leaders were following public sentiment as
much as leading it. Many Americans believed that rapid growth
was necessary to preempt territorial claims on the West
by the empires of Spain, Britain, Mexico, France, and Russia.
Tragically,
this rapid growth strategy came at a terrible price. It
gave the Federal government an excuse to maintain a large
standing army that it would later use to ruthlessly crush
Southern states during the War of Northern Aggression Against
Southern Independence (1861-1865). It also conditioned new
immigrants to look to the federal government as their ultimate
benefactor to acquire land rather than a state government,
creating another nail in the coffin of States' Rights and
opening another door towards unlimited federal growth. One
might say that rapid western growth through federal government
direction comprised its flanking maneuver against the "true
federalism" doctrine intended by most states for the
original U.S. Constitution, where the federal government
was supposed to always be kept weaker than the state governments.
Like
so many anarcho-libertarians, Woods does not directly address
racial and ethnic issues, so let me connect some dots here
with my own views while I am on this topic: America went
from a provincial social model during the colonial period
to a fast growth Roman imperial model masquerading as a
"limited republic" beginning with the George Washington
presidency. This "limited-republic-at risk" finally
let the mask of the Big Government cunning predator completely
slip away during Abe Lincoln's War of Northern Aggression
Against Southern Independence, which totally destroyed all
viable remnants of the "limited republic" of the
so-called "Founding Fathers," and installed in
its place a Neo-Jacobin version of Napoleonic France in
North America. Then along came the Rothschilds and millions
of other Jews, and under their "wise and noble tutelage"
in the 20th century, America morphed into New Babylon and
a nonfiction version of the Galactic
Empire of the Sith. . (See High Priests
of War, The New Jerusalem, The New Babylon
by Michael Collins Piper and the "snake book series"
by Col
Donn de Grand Pre). Once
one understands the general trend of America's sociological
changes, Dr. Wood's books in cooperation with Dr. Kevin
Gutzman about the U.S. Constitution become much more comprehensible.
In a radio interview, Dr. Gutzman observed that in the 20th
century, the federal government simply ignored the Constitution
most of the time. Dr. Gutzman's books with Dr. Woods show
us the steady process of erosion in the fundamental support
structures of the Constitution that began soon after the
document was created, and only accelerated into the 19th
and then 20th centuries. Things really hit a new low in
the 20th century when the Jewish Supreme Court Justice Louis
Brandeis justified decisions based on "sociological
theories" that he simply pulled out of his hip pocket,
which had absolutely nothing to do with the original Constitution.
There
is also an interesting paradox at play here where both modern
liberals (environmental top-down "Neo-Jacobins"
in my chart above) and old fashioned paleoconservatives
("genetic bottom up") can become disdainful of
too much emphasis on "Constitutionalism" --but
for opposite ideological reasons. Neo-Jacobins
view the Constitution as a creature of ideology, which is
reinvented to change with the times and new ruling elites.
They also believe that one needs a strong state to enforce
ideology and hold America together. Therefore, we saw President
George W. Bush calling the Constitution just a "G-D
piece of paper" when it got in the way of his latest
Zionist neocon ideological revelations and Big Government
power needs.In
contrast, paleoconservatives point out that a number of
European countries like Iceland, England, and Switzerland
have operated stable, successful parliamentary governments
respectful of individual rights for extended periods in
their history without any written Constitution at all. An
important reason is that they have maintained a stable,
homogeneous white ethnic population in which parliamentary
traditions and human rights are firmly embedded in their
folk traditions. From this viewpoint, a sudden emphasis
on "constitutionalism" can be a negative indicator
that greedy businessmen now want to import alien peoples
as cheap labor, and claim that they can indoctrinate aliens
in enough "constitutional law" to make them "just
as good" as longstanding citizens (This did not seem
to work too well with America's first suspected "illegal
alien president" Barack Hussein Obama II, aka Barry
Soetero, who is a former "professor" of constitutional
law). In actuality, when one starts filling up the country
with too many different peoples with innately different
value systems, it loses the critical mass of deeply felt
core sentiment required to preserve the true spirit of any
original constitution. Instead, everything becomes all form
and no substance, where people focus on legalities rather
than real justice. As the Roman writer Tacitus once observed,
"When the state is most corrupt, then the laws are
most multiplied." He said this long after the once
fairly homogeneous Roman Republic had dissolved into a highly
corrupt and centralized multi-racial empire. An excessive
dependency on "Constitutionalism" can become symptomatic
of "multiplying law, " and hence a negative when
it causes people to lose sight of the fact that in the long
run, blood is thicker than anything else. Speaking
of blood and liberty, I have some very serious disagreements
with Dr. Wood's book How
the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization.
Not surprisingly, Dr. Woods is a convert to Roman
Catholicism. I provide links to many sources that directly
contradict underlying premises of this work in my Religious
Archive web page. A good starting point is the The
Age of Reason by Tom Paine and the work Which Way
Western Man? by William Gayley Simpson (see
archive page), which debunk Christianity itself. Regarding
the Catholic Church, consider A
Lamp in the Dark: The Untold History of the Bible,
or the works of Sir Edward Gibbon, author of The Decline
and Fall of the Roman Empire, who believed that the
Catholic Church was more of an expression of Roman decadence
than its solution. William Simpson explained how Christianity
has many leftist-universalistic philosophical characteristics
in common with communism. He also explained how Christianity
was invented by Jews and has many very unattractive Jewish
characteristics embedded within it. Even
Dr. Murray Rothbard admitted that the Protestant Reformation
was about political and religious decentralization, to include
the right for each individual to read the Bible and interpret
it on his own, as well as politically break away from Vatican
dictatorship, all of which is the opposite direction from
where the Catholic Church was headed. Not surprisingly,
the Protestant Reformation predominated in majority Nordic
countries, where a certain streak of libertarianism seems
to be embedded in the DNA. Perhaps the increased intellectual
and economic output in Protestant countries that coincided
with throwing off the Catholic yoke provides a better perspective
for evaluating the Catholic contribution to "Western
Civilization."I
am sure that one can find considerable good done by the
Catholic Church in certain places, but then again, once
a parasite takes over its host, it has to stop hurting it
and actually start helping it at some point in order for
both to survive. At some point, the Catholic Church focused
less energy on rooting out and torturing heretics, and brainwashing
people with Jewish-created dogmas. The Catholic Church actually
started to do some good things for people. Similarly, Soviet
Russia at one point started to focus less time on mass murder
and running the GULAG, and instead started to do things
which would help to rebuild Russia. Maybe this is an area
where I can find some common ground with Dr. Woods on the
Catholic Church issue.This
leads to another important point, namely that Jews have
used their alliance with Catholics in America to outflank
and dispossess WASP's in a similar manner to the way the
Federal government was able to use its large professional
standing army used to conquer the West to outflank States'
rights. I discuss all this in greater detail in my "Handling
Real Nazis' section in Chapter
34 of my Trilogy titled "Saving
Dr. Toben, Handling Real Nazis, and Countering the Holocaustianity
Intellectual Blackjack." Hardly
willing to benefit from constructive criticism by Protestants,
there have been certain Popes who have unleashed covert
private armies of Jesuits and other professional subversives
under oath to reverse both republican government and the
Protestant Reformation in Protestant countries. Today, Catholics
are as numerous as Protestants in America --and should we
be surprised that this Jewish-Catholic takeover seems to
be leading America towards the perfect police state? (Janet
Napolitano, the Catholic-Jewish head of the Department
of Homeland Security -- America's answer to Soviet KGB and
Nazi
Gestapo -- serves as a poster girl in this regard).
As previously mentioned on this web page, Catholics typically
swing back and forth politically between WASPs and Jews
like the way mestizos swing between whites and Indians in
Latin American politics, and as I document in Chapter
29 of my Trilogy from research by Michael Collins
Piper's and Brother Nathanael Kapner, there is strong evidence
that there have been times when the Vatican has been run
outright by Jewish infiltrators. Among other things, the
Vatican has a long history of relying on the Rothschilds
to manage its finances. The fact that Catholic scholars
on the Mises Institute staff almost never directly criticize
Jews or Zionists, yet accept funding contributions from
them, while advocating libertarian ideals originated by
WASP's, helps to support these assertions.Of
course I do not mean imply that Dr. Woods himself is necessarily
some kind of "useful idiot" in a Jesuit conspiracy.
(Capt Eric May, who I cover in my Trilogy, thinks
many Catholics have mellowed out over time, which is why
he humored his Catholic wife by letting himself get baptized
by them in Chapter
13). In fact, there is at least one area of common philosophical
ground that Dr. Woods appears to share with both myself
and a paleoconservative nationalist like Dr. Matthew Raphael
Johnson who is a priest in the Ukrainian Orthodox church
(profiled in the nationalist section further down this web
page). According to Wikipedia: "As a traditional Catholic,
[Dr. Woods] advocates the Extraordinary
Form of the Mass and cultural
conservatism." The idea is that in order to be
a really hardcore conservative (or even "nationalist"),
one needs to find "indigenous" forms of religion
that have passed the test of time over many centuries within
a stabilized population that reflect the evolution of "natural"
values. In fact, in this area I am not only on the same
page as Dr. Woods and Dr. Johnson, but am even further to
the right. I support the modern revitalization of the Old
Norse religion, as discussed in Part
I of my Iceland series, or my interview
with the late Icelandic religious leader Sveinbjorn Beinteinsson.
However,
I cannot push this area of common ground too far either,
after all, there were some definite areas of "friction"
in the "values department" between Norsemen and
Catholics in places like the shorelines of France, England,
and Ireland during the Viking Age, or between Eastern Orthodox
Christians and Roman Catholics when the great Russian hero
Alexander
Nevsky won his victory against the Catholic Teutonic
Knights in the Battle
of the Ice on 5 April 1242. Nevsky apparently considered
even Mongols a lessor evil compared to Catholics. Wikipedia
notes:
"Historians seem to be unsure about Alexander’s
behavior when it came to his relations with Mongols. He
may have thought that Catholicism presented a more tangible
threat to Russian national identity than paying a tribute
to the Khan, who had little interest in Russian religion
and culture."Despite
my many reservations regarding Dr. Wood's interpretations
of certain religious issues, I believe that his articles
about American history and the Constitution are a "must
read." Mises
Institute articles
archiveMises
Institute MP3
archiveLew
Rockwell articles
archive.

Dr. Thomas Woods

Rev.
Ted Pike is an important defender of free speech
on the Religious Right. Our First Amendment rights are a prerequisite
before any other rights become meaningful. As in the case
of Dr. Thomas Woods, while I express disagreement with many
of Rev. Pike's views on a theological level (as reflected
on my Religious
Crisis web page), this does not negate our pressing need
to make common cause with all patriotic Americans regardless
of their religious background against evil forces like the
ADL that seek to destroy our free speech rights and turn America
into a complete police state. This could result in what Alex
Jones refers to as "global population reduction"
genocide of major portions of this country. Don't
laugh --it already happened in Bolshevik Russia. I agree with
Alex Jones that most Americans have no concept regarding the
level of evil we are up against.I
list the articles of Rev Ted and his niece Harmony Grant Daws
on a special Rev
Ted Pike web page, which serves as a backup to
the articles that Rev. Pike lists at his own web site truthtellers.org.

Rev. Ted Pike and his wife Alynn

Other libertarians:

There are many dozens of other libertarian thinkers and
media leaders who are worthy of mention. Please check out
"The French Connection" at iamthewitness.com
that gives Zionism a black eye while claiming "We are
not racist, xenophobic, homophobic, or prejudiced against
any race, creed, or national origin. We are prejudiced only
against criminals." For those of you Yuppies out there
who are too politically correct squeamish to squarely address
racial and ethnic issues, maybe this is the only way I can
inspire you to get your feet wet and wake up just a little
bit.

Please got to my Site
Map section to find many of other important
web sites listed under "Some important libertarian
sites."

In
the early 19th century, a distinctly "American"
form of "nationalism" had developed which meant
replacing supposedly effete, fossilized, and decrepit
European forms of land, class, religious, and ethnic-based
"nationalism" with what one might call "frontier
Darwinism."Three
of the most famous American political leaders to openly
exploit the theme of "frontier Darwinism" were
Andrew
Jackson, Davy
Crockett, and Theodore
Roosevelt (pictured above). "Frontier
Darwinism" is the idea that the hard conditions of
the North American wilderness and Indian wars encouraged
the selection of a more innately fit people, as well as
provided territory to support the enhanced genetic expansion
of their superior characteristics. All of this in turn
supported Manifest
Destiny, American
Exceptionalism, and even famous art works
like "American
Progress" and "Westward
the Course of Empire Takes its Way."(In
Why
Civilizations Self-Destruct, Dr. Elmer Pendell
explains how this concept has validity. For example, a
disproportionate number of successful inventors of the
19th century were directly descended from the first waves
of immigrants in the 17th century who were culled by unusually
harsh winters and other "survival of the fittest"
selective factors that favored intelligent, hardy, innovative,
far-sighted and intrepid settlers over the cowardly and
weak)."Old
Hickory" Jackson from "West of the Appalachians"
was the first U.S. President born
in a log cabin. Davy Crockett charmed audiences on
his lecture tours in Eastern cities by bragging "I'm
that same David Crockett, fresh from the backwoods, half-horse,
half-alligator, a little touched with the snapping turtle;
can wade the Mississippi, leap the Ohio, ride upon a streak
of lightning, and slip without a scratch down a honey
locust [tree];" and Theodore Roosevelt cultivated
a "Rough Rider" image. Both
Jackson and Crockett seasoned their bravado with genuine
populist politics, whereas Roosevelt remains the most
suspect and potentially counterfeit regarding his background
and ultimate loyalties. Roosevelt used inherited "Eastern
Establishment" wealth to go play
cowboy in the Dakota territory in the 1880's, and
turned a blind eye to the worst Robber Barons, to include
Rothschild agents who created the privately owned Federal
Reserve Banking System in 1913 -- in stark contrast to
Andrew Jackson who almost got assassinated by a likely
Rothschild agent, and who also claimed that killing the
central bank was one of his greatest achievements. Please
see my
Chapt. 33 discussion of President Andrew Jackson and
the Federal Reserve. Also, Dr. Murray Rothbard wrote in
"Wall
Street, Banks, and American Foreign Policy" that
"Theodore Roosevelt had been a Morgan man from the
beginning of his career." (Chapt.
33 explains how J.P. Morgan, like John D. Rockefeller,
was closely allied with the Rothschilds and City of London).
Roosevelt
revealed another very suspicious side to his character
when he waged verbal war against all forms of "hyphenated
Americans" --except Jewish Americans, of course.
This compounded a problem of lack of ancestral
identity that has contributed towards the steady decline
of WASPs and other whites in the face of tidal waves of
Third World immigration. The
Wikipedia article on "Hyphenated
Americans" states that "Former President
Theodore Roosevelt in speaking to the largely Irish Catholic
Knights of Columbus at Carnegie Hall on Columbus Day 1915,
asserted that:

There
is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism.
When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer
to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans
I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans
born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American
at all... The one absolutely certain way of bringing
this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of
its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit
it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an
intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans,
English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans
or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality,
each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of
that nationality, than with the other citizens of the
American Republic... There is no such thing as a hyphenated
American who is a good American. The only man who is
a good American is the man who is an American and nothing
else.

A
hardcore paleoconservative like myself would counter that
Roosevelt had things upside down and backwards. The best
way to avoid a Civil War Two form of social instability
(see discussion of Tom Chittum's work further down the page)
is to keep the immigration of "hyphenated-Americans"
restricted to those of shared WASP/Nordic/Celtic ancestry,
rather than suppress the "hyphenated issue" altogether
and then keep adding ever more exotic "hyphenated"
Americans to the population mix. In addition, in all my
readings about first generation German, Norwegian, Swedish,
English, Dutch, Scottish and other northern European communities
in America in the 19th century, I am left with the impression
that they offered the best of two worlds. On the one hand,
America's boundless resources gave them strong incentives
to put their strong work ethic and entrepreneurial talents
to productive use. On the other hand, they retained Old
World memories and social fabric and hence were much more
likely to have both feet on the ground on a moral, ethical,
and political level than most Americans today. I believe
this was a major reason for why American settlers in real
life generally experienced "spontaneous order"
on a grass roots level (see my further explanation of this
Hayakian term in my Chapt.
38 discussion of Dr. Murray Rothbard's description of
colonial Pennsylvania as a model libertarian society). These
northern European ethnic communities were far less violent
and chaotic than portrayed by Hollywood, as also noted in
Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo's 22 Sept 2010 article The
Culture of Violence in the American West: Myth versus Reality.First
generation WASPs in 19th century America generally "knew
the score" on Jews, Catholics and other alien groups
based upon longstanding Old World experience, and were much
less likely to be taken in by "Neo-Jacobin" mass
media propaganda which commenced on steroids with the War
Against Southern Independence (1861-1865) than their second
and third generation offspring. (An extreme example of Protestant
vs. Catholic competition in America in the 1860's was dramatized
in the fictional film Gangs
of New York, although told with a pro-Catholic
bias. Also, one typically found very little need to lecture
first generation gentile Russian and Polish immigrants to
the United States about "the Jews," whose views
were typically every bit as impassioned as those of Christian
and Muslim Palestinian refugees today).A
strong sense of ethnic roots also provided a strong incentive
for individuals to be successful and act as model citizens
to become a "credit" to their group. This sense
of ethnic group pride has now been totally lost by most
members of the post WWII "me" generations, and
films produced by Jewish Hollywood today typically ridicule
gentile characters who talk about someone being a "credit
to their race." As
one particularly quaint example of an earlier "Victorian"
period of ethnic pride, in The
Promise of America: A History of the Norwegian American
People, Dr. Odd S. Lovell describes how the
19th century Norwegian American communities in Minnesota
and Wisconsin bent over backwards to find jobs and provide
free housing for young immigrant girls from Norway, because
(among other motives) it would be too embarrassing if any
of these girls turned to prostitution. Jews
have retained a sense of ethnically-based group self-help
better than most northern European-descended white groups,
which helps explain the Jewish rise to power in the 20th
century as their gentile competitors became increasingly
self-centered and atomized, and hence more easily divided
and conquered or else just plain dysfunctional and apathetic
in the face of the Jewish envelopment of America through
control of the privately owned Federal Reserve system, mass
media, and other strategic bases of society. On top of all
this, with the decline of WASPs to one more minority, coequal
with Catholics, and the decline of Nordics from over 60%
to less than 20% of the white population, the actual "demographic
DNA" of the total population has shifted away from
people with a high innate capacity for grass roots "spontaneous
order" towards innately authoritarian people who emotionally
crave various forms of paternalism, to include "fascism"
or a "redistributor chief" Big Brother. Worse
yet, the Federal bureaucracy has swollen enormously with
vast armies of "rent-seekers" and "busy bodies"
by innate temperament who are being given ever-expanding
authority to meddle in all parts of the lives of private
citizens, and literally suffocate all forms of individual
initiative with over-regulation.The
real driving force behind the extreme "pluralism"
that emerged in the late 19th century was greed and envy,
not any kind of social "wisdom." That is, greed
for low cost labor by Robber Baron industrialists, and the
political expediency of building up the "envy vote"
by anti-WASP Catholics and Jews who ran the Democratic Party.
They could add to their voting base by enfranchising ever
larger numbers of non-WASPs.All
of this was bad enough for America -- not to mention the
extreme
psychological fracturing inflicted on America
during the War Between the States and the so-called Reconstruction
Era -- but all of this escalated into a global
tragedy in the 20th century, when Jews and their minions
used America as their super power riding horse to wage war
against genuine nationalists around the world in the name
of their "globalist agenda." This included funding
support by Jacob Schiff and related Rothschild confederates
in New York City for Bolshevism in Russia that started towards
the end of WWI. It also included the "economic hit
men" activities conducted on behalf of Mossad-CIA and
big money center banks described by John Perkins which accelerated
after World War II. (See John Perkins
interview below). Other highlights include the gratuitous
bombing of Serbian nationalists in the 1990's, and America's
unprovoked invasions of Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003),
without any clear national interest or for that matter any
evidence of WMD's or proof of involvement in 9/11, which
was in all likelihood a Mossad-CIA false flag operation.
In
the midst of all these "fun and games, one can in fact
demonstrate clear interests on the part of Israel and the
Jewish Lobby, certain international oil companies, the "military
industrial complex," and mercenary enterprises like
the old Blackwater/new Xe. (See Chapter
7 of the Mission of Conscience series about
the 9/11 inside job, and Chapter
12 about Bin Laden and Sadam Hussein fakery). My big
bugaboo is that I simply fail how to see how any of this
pertains to genuine American national interests consistent
with any traditional American conservative nationalist principles.Probably
the closest the United States has ever come to having leaders
who could intelligently articulate a coherent nationalist
policy and then come reasonably close to practicing what
they preached took place during the administration of President
Thomas Jefferson, who favored a sound money system, even-handed
diplomacy, representative government, popular sovereignty,
and an emphasis on growth through the internal development
of scientific and technological institutions as well as
conquest of the frontier. His 19th century brand of "classical
liberalism" was reasonably close to the "paleoconservative"
agenda that I describe in greater detail in my Resolving
Opposing Ideologies series. Interestingly
enough, as he got older, Jefferson became increasingly more
of a racial nationalist, stating that northern Europeans
were more fit for republican government than southern Europeans.
Jefferson developed an Anglo-Saxon grammar book to help
Anglo-descended Americans get closer to their indigenous
cultural and linguistic roots. He also favored a "naturalistic"
approach to religion (such as in his reference to "Nature's
God" in the Declaration of Independence or through
his close friendship with fellow "Deist" Tom Paine
that included inviting him to the White House after he published
The Age of Reason which debunked the Bible). Dr.
Hans Gunther claims towards the end of The
Religious Attitudes of the Indo-Europeans
that Jefferson was much closer to indigenous forms of Indo-European
religiosity than Christians.Throughout
most of the 20th century, just about everything that Jefferson
promoted got inverted. A strange irony emerged where most
Americans felt themselves to be a free people and comprising
the most powerful nation in the world, and yet at the same
time they had effectively lost control of most forms of
popular sovereignty in the face of top political, financial,
and business leaders who habitually supported alien interests
at the expense of their own legitimate national interests.
This will probably go down as one of the greatest, most
longstanding, and most destructive delusions in world history.

An Introduction
to American "Nationalism"

by William B. Fox

One
of the great tragedies of American "nationalism"
is that it has always been something of a joke by traditional
European standards. This is one reason why William Everdell
remarked in The
End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans
that the entire right hand side of the British political
spectrum was completely missing in the colonies at the time
of the American War of Independence (or "American
Revolutionary War" or whatever). In
assessing early American forms of "right wing"
nationalism, I am reminded of the quip by Dr. Murray Rothbard
that "Artists often get it right, they just don't know
why." Similarly, early Americans often found themselves
intuitively doing "the right things for the wrong reasons"
or often doing the "right" things despite
rather than because of their official religious
or political ideology. This naïveté and lack
of a conscious understanding of "key success factors"
would later cost Americans dearly. From my own life experience,
I have observed that in the long run, we tend to pay a price
for our delusions and ignorance (both in terms of real costs
and opportunity costs) that is greater than what we gain.
As
one example of gross misdirection, the Puritans who settled
most of New England in the 17th and 18th centuries originally
promoted hard-line interpretations and enforcement of Biblical
dogma, particularly in regard to the Old Testament. In the
short run, this gave the Puritans a sense of commitment
to a higher cause (see, for example, the famous "A
Shining City Upon A Hill" speech by John Winthrop,
first governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony). Certainly
such things as social cohesion, self-discipline, and a sense
of higher purpose helped Puritans survive cruel winters,
Indian attacks and other extreme stresses of the frontier.
On a superficial level, many of these things are consistent
with "nationalism," to the extent that "nationalism"
implies the way in which people organize themselves and
address issues to support their own group survival and practice
"charity begins at home." However, despite the
short term advantages Old Testament-style "nationalism,"
it became long term a disaster for Americans on at least
two counts (a) The Puritans were actually "free-riding"
on the nationalism of an alien people, that is, ancient
Jews, whose more recent analogs would exploit this as an
ideological wedge to infiltrate and take over American society
at its highest levels, to include creating its privately
owned central bank in 1913, followed by gobbling up control
of major media; and (b) the Puritan brand of nationalism
was based upon highly flawed Jewish mythology rather than
grounded upon scientific principles, as reflected in the
conflicts one sees between Puritan theology and modern psychiatry
in the Salem
witch trials of 1692-1693, between fundamentalist Christianity
and the modern theory of evolution in the Scopes
Monkey Trial of 1925, or between Christian theology
in general, and the biological world view advocated in works
such as Which Way Western Man? by William Gayley
Simpson, A New Theory of Evolution by Sir Arthur
Keith, Beyondism: Religion From Science by Dr.
Raymond Cattell, or Sociobiology: The New Synthesis
by Dr. Edward Wilson. In
my Religious
Crisis web page, I argue that truly authentic forms
of nationalism draw upon the tribal history and indigenous
culture of ones own people, rather than that of
an alien people (to include Jews). After all, if one does
not care enough about ones own ancestors to show reverence
for their indigenous culture, why would want care enough
about their descendants to support their economic and military
strength and the quality of their culture and social cohesion?Another
important area of American nationalist naïveté
involved an inability of early Anglo-Saxon and Celtic-descended
Americans to thoroughly understand their own anthropological
background or explicitly grasp the broader social and political
implications of "frontier Darwinism." "Darwinism"
itself was more of a subconscious, intuitive phenomenon
rather than something stated on an explicitly intellectual
level in the early 19th century, especially given that Charles
Darwin's landmark work On
the Origin of Species that explained the mechanics
of natural selection was not published until 1859. Nevertheless,
I find it difficult to find a better term to describe the
savagery of frontier conditions that shaped the "American
character," to include militias that played a key role
in winning the War of Independence.Quite
a few early American writings that call attention to overly
arrogant, inbred, effete Brits during the War of Independence.
They drip with "frontier Darwinism" themes even
if the sentiments expressed were not explicitly identified
as such. As one example, Thomas Jefferson excoriated certain
incompetent, lazy, and overly inbred European aristocrats
and lionized hard-working yeoman American farmers and rough-hewn
Spartan frontiersmen. As another example, Americans made
fun of British expeditions into the Wilderness where soldiers
behaved like toy soldiers and their commanders required
an entourage complete with mistresses and fancy china dinnerware.
Last, but not least, de facto "Darwinist" themes
also had a way of surfacing whenever Europeans sought a
"Manifest Destiny" justification for killing Indians
and taking their land.The
Puritans who originally settled most of New England in the
17th and 18th centuries came from eastern England, formerly
the "Danelaw" areas conquered by Danish and Norwegian
Vikings and settled by the first Anglo-Saxon invasions,
an area which remains the most Nordic part of the British
Isles. Most Puritans had no idea what "Nordic"
meant in any kind of anthropological, cultural, or historical
sense, particularly in relation to other groups such as
Celts, Alpines -- or complete aliens such as Jews. They
had little idea about the innate behavioral and cultural
characteristics of Nordic peoples -- to include their weaknesses
as well as strengths. Nor did they understand how the Nordic
concept of "egalitarianism" implied a relatively
large middle class of economically self-sufficient, armed
free men who lived under relatively dispersed conditions
within homogeneous northern European societies, all of which
contrasted sharply with authoritarian peasant societies
in southern and eastern Europe and elsewhere, or the highly
urban environments favored by Jews. Nor would the New England
Puritans' descendants in the 19th and 20th centuries adequately
grasp in advance the threat posed by Jewish Marxist concepts
of "equality," which completely ignore race and
ethnicity -- for gentiles (but not fellow Jews).Regarding
problems in grasping "frontier Darwinism," Dr.
Elmer Pendell explained in his classic work Why Civilizations
Self-Destruct how an amazingly disproportionate number
of successful inventors and patent holders of the 19th century
came from the first 17th century waves New England Puritans
and other immigrants to America who gave rise to the phrase
"Yankee ingenuity." These first waves often suffered
savage attrition from cruel winters that tended to weed
out lazy and stupid people incapable of future planning.
American frontier conditions also rewarded men of courage,
enterprise, and ingenuity who could not only develop new
land as owners and entrepreneurs, but also multiply their
genetic characteristics as a proportion of the overall population
by having large families. All of this in turn had in an
important eugenic impact on the viability and quality of
Americans social and political institutions.In
later periods, American demagogues would totally ignore
the importance of frontier Darwinism and Nordic and Celtic
anthropology, and attribute American successes simply to
abstract leftist interpretations of "personal freedom"
and "equality" that they claimed could also "elevate"
(or at least gain votes from) "wretched refuse"
types of people. They would use these leftist interpretations
as ideological battering rams to open America up to endless
waves of low cost alien labor or various types of rent-seeking
alien mafia bent on infiltrating and looting America --
like Jews and Sicilian mafia. Worse
yet, various Robber Barons would invent a perverse brand
of "social
Darwinism" that could be used as an excuse for
monopolistic plutocrats (like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds)
to violate Nordic and Celtic concepts of fair play and equal
rights among common people in order to shamelessly deceive,
loot, or even poison them. Alex
Jones blames "eugenicists"
for various types of sinister plots against Americans, but
I think that this is simplistic. On top of this, he incessantly
ties in his concept of "Nazi eugenics" (not necessarily
historically accurate) with "globalist" (that
is "Zionist") eugenics programs that entail massive
depopulation through additives to food and water supplies,
radiation warfare, and other stealth measures that increase
sterility, miscarriages, and birth defects around the world.
Everyone
is more or less a "eugenicist" and a "social
Darwinist," if only on a subconscious level and highly
personal and decentralized level, just like deep down inside
everyone is also a "racist." It is normal and
healthy to be a "eugenicist," "social Darwinist,"
and even a "racist" to the extent that genetics
is a very real part of life, and there should be a place
to deal with these "facts of life" in an open
and honest manner. An intelligent, pretty girl practices
a personal, decentralized, informal type of eugenics when
she goes out of her way to be accessible towards equally
intelligent and attractive potential future husbands while
shunning ugly, stupid, and inadequate males for dates. Most
people accept this kind of behavior as normal, natural,
and desirable.The
real issue to me is the extent to which one understands
"eugenics" and "social Darwinism" (and
"race") well enough on a conscious, scientific
level so that one handle issues in a reasonably intelligent
and humane manner without getting hijacked by alien propagandists
and hostile interests. (See Dr. Kevin MacDonald discuss
eugenics from a very different perspective than Alex Jones
in the video "The
End of White People 2: Jewish Intelligence and Goals").
One
can reasonably suspect that the Rockefellers and their Rothschild
allies have always held hostile and alien interpretations
of "social Darwinian" and "eugenics"
to justify evil policies. Early in the 20th century, their
excesses included the infamous "Ludlow
Massacre" of 1914, the Federal Reserve private
monopoly created in 1913, and abuses described by Jack London
in his famous work The
Iron Heel. Later on we got UN
Agenda 21 population reduction agenda,GMO
food and vaccination-induced sterilization schemes,
and Aldous Huxley's Brave
New World. Incidentally, Alex Jones claims that
Huxley confessed to creating Brave New World as
a form of "predictive programming" (see Chapt.
37 for more on this "Infowar" phenomenon)
to prepare the public for the long term globalist
agenda.A
fundamental difference between more decentralized Nordic
and Celtic forms of "social Darwinism" that characterized
early Americans compared to the Zionist versions which came
later is the strong tenancy towards "Asiatic despotism"
that characterizes Jews, as explained in Chapter
5 of my Mission of Conscience series. No
doubt there are a quite few American Indians who believe
that either version of "social Darwinism" has
to be bad, because either approach can kill them just as
dead. However, I still hold to the notion that Nordics and
Celts retain more genuinely humanitarian instincts and scientific
talent than both Zionists and Indians, and therefore, all
things being held equal, they compare favorably with everyone
else. In addition, not all American Indian tribes acted
like "noble savages" or "innocent and unspoiled
children of nature" upon initial contact with the white
man. To the contrary, a significant number of North American
Indian tribes were heavily bent towards cannibalism, despotism,
women-beating,
child molestation, blood-curdling human sacrifice, slavery,
torture, and superstition. (Recall in the Declaration
of Independence how Thomas Jefferson talked about "the
merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is
an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.")
In fact, there is evidence that their ancestors ruthlessly
exterminated Caucasians like "Kennewick
Man" who were on the North American continent
first. (More on "KM" and "Solutreanism"
in Chapt.
34).Ever
since the commencement of "King
Lincoln's" War of Northern Aggression Against Southern
Independence in 1861, the nicest thing one can say about
traditional American "conservatism" (which started
out as a polite euphemism for "pro-WASP ethnic nationalism")
is that it has been able to fight some kind of delaying
action against the never-ending, cancerous growths of out-of-control
neo-Jacobin federal government and the myriad manifestations
of Jewish Marxism and Zionism. Since "demographics
is destiny," it should be no big surprise that the
Nordic percentage of the U.S. population has been in steady
decline since this period (see, for example the online book
The
Passing of the Great Race by Madison Grant,
first published in 1916, subsequently amended in the 1920's
and 1930's) and the proportion of increasingly economically
empowered and politically enfranchised alien groups has
steadily been on the rise.There
has been a longstanding joke on the American Right that
what is "conservative" today is merely what was
introduced as "radical left wing" only a few decades
before. The late Harvard economist John Kenneth Galbraith
noted in The Age of Uncertainty that many of his
students were shocked when they first read the Communist
Manifesto and saw how many items on the plank had become
a reality in America. Reinforcing this same point, Nobel
Laureate Milton Friedman commented in a late 1970's
Forbes interview that virtually every item on the 1928
Socialist plank eventually became a reality in America.
Meanwhile,
white American society only seems to become ever more fragmented
over time. Not surprisingly, the overall society has became
ever more multi-racial, multi-cultural, imperial, and plantation-like
in its de facto social structure. There is no "indigenous
identity" for whites, often the bedrock of other nationalist
movements around the world. In the prevailing business culture,
"success" for whites means the ability to make
a quick buck while suppressing all feelings of natural tribal
loyalty for fellow whites -- to in essence be as undiscriminating
as a whore in a Nevada bordello --unless one happens to
be Jewish, in which case it is totally acceptable to totally
dominate the management of the Federal Reserve, Hollywood
firms, small Brooklyn sweatshops -- whatever Jews want,
Jews get -- as one of the most ferociously tribalistic peoples
in world history.
Today, America comprises a truly amazing sociological and
ideological train wreck with unspeakably evil cabals redoubling
their efforts to feed on its carcass by installing police
state and martial law control grids.In
my introduction to the Kevin
Strom author archive, I explain how America today is
ideologically redder than a lobster by traditional European
standards. For example, most Americans would view Kevin
Strom as "radical right wing." Politically correct
Federal agents who tried to frame Strom while he was undergoing
divorce proceedings with his second wife, Elisha Strom,
probably wanted to leave the subliminal impression with
the American public: "Bad luck on Strom for being so
right wing, and bad luck on you if you read his stuff and
take him seriously." Yet ironically, by many traditional
European standards Strom actually did three very left wing
things: a) He married outside his European country of ancestral
origin b) he married outside his class (upper middle class
professional) and c) he married outside his ethnicity.Speaking
of European attitudes, in my section "Handling Real
Nazis" of Chapter
34 of my Trilogy, I describe my encounter with
a scholar while riding on a train in Britain, who said:
"Well, I say [old chap], you Americans come from an
interesting land where everything is new. You Americans
have no history, you have no class, and you have no culture."
I also referenced John de Nugent, a white civil rights activist,
who claimed that while he lived in France, many French expressed
the attitude that America is simply a land of overgrown
adolescents. He quoted former French leader Clemenceau,
who allegedly said "The US is the only society to have
gone from barbarism to decadence without passing through
civilization along the way."White
Anglo Saxon Protestants (WASP's), who were once America's
overwhelming majority, have been reduced to another minority
about co-equal in size with Catholics, and both groups are
dominated by Jews, and neither WASP's nor Catholics seem
to care very much about the possibility of getting completely
obliterated by the Death
of the West trend identified in Pat Buchanan's
book by this same name.On
an ideological level, things only went from bad to worse
in America when the floodgates of immigration were opened
up to all European nationalities in the late 19th century
in order to rapidly populate the remaining frontier, which
also meant rapidly driving up real estate values and driving
down real wages for the benefit of greedy land speculators
and industrialists. Instead of "folk, faith, and the
sacred motherland of ones ancestors," it became "money,
money, money." It also became a land of "tinsel,
neon, and honky tonks" instead of "high culture."
In
Appendix
IV of my Iceland series which addresses American history
from a nationalist perspective, I explain the highly dualistic
nature of the original U.S. Constitution. On the one hand,
it supported State's Rights where State Legislatures originally
selected representatives to the U.S. Senate. On the other
hand, it promoted federal centrism through direct election
by the public to the U.S. House of Representatives. This
is one example where Americans created a "have your
cake and eat it too" society.In
the 19th century, Americans wanted to have the libertarian
ethos that typically accompanies a relatively small homogeneous
Nordic or Nordic-Celtic society like Iceland, Scotland,
England, Norway, and Sweden, yet at the same time America
operated as a de facto multi-layered and multi-ethnic and
even multi-racial plantation society more reminiscent of
ancient Babylon. Americans imported black slaves in the
South and Irish and Italian Catholics as low cost industrial
workers in the North. In the 20th century, the federal government
maintained a de facto open borders policy with tidal waves
of low cost, illegal alien immigrants from Mexico.In
the 19th century America wanted to retain the "democratic
feel" of New England town hall meetings, yet at the
same time run a de facto imperial war machine that conquered
the "inland empire" of the North American continent,
only to later use it to smash the Old South and along with
it any credible doctrine of States' Rights --which Thomas
Jefferson stated in the Kentucky
Resolutions of 1798 was the only credible deterrent
to unlimited federal growth and federal tyranny. In the
20th century this same imperial war machine morphed into
a Zionist-friendly global cop that looks the other way whenever
Israelis kill Americans (as noted again at the end of this
piece) while Americans kill over a million Iraqis and Afghans
for Israel and Rothschild-controlled big oil interests.This
country has always been doing one thing on a sociological
and business level, and then doing something totally the
opposite on a superficial ideological or rhetorical level.
This disparity became especially wide after 1861, as captured
in Dr. Revilo Oliver's excellent article "The
Beginning of the End," Liberty Bell, Aug
1988. Unfortunately
the land of the "Wild West" went from having problems
that were "fixable" to problems that have become
completely out of control. Even today one can find many
well-crafted "Victorian" and "American Gothic"
old houses around the country, not to mention beautiful
mansions in the South, that give the sense that Americans
were trying to evolve their own "high culture"
in the mid to late 1800's before something very dark started
creeping into their land, only to drag down Americans and
stab them in the heart, just like what happened to the Russian
people. (See the last sentence of the article "Russia's
Christian Martyrs" by Marina Marynova. Also, nostalgia
for the late 19th century period is probably one reason
why the works of artists like Thomas Kinkade, the "Painter
of Light," are so popular in America today. Norman
Rockwell is another noteworthy "nostalgia
artist" of "Americana," although he later
allowed his approach to get hijacked
as propaganda for the modern liberal agenda. See also
why William S. Lind thinks Americans may historically cycle
back towards becoming "New Victorians" in his
satirical piece ""Militant
Musings: From Nightmare 1995 to My Utopian 2050")
.After
the Federal government became a foaming-at-the-mouth neo-Jacobin
state following Abe Lincoln's War and the so-called "Reconstruction"
era in the South, the Robber Barons who controlled the government
from behind the scenes took the attitude that by pumping
anarcho-libertarian ideology into the brains of "wretched
refuse" imported as cheap labor from all over Europe,
this could erase centuries old racial and ethnic conflicts
while cobbling together an empire of "useful idiot"
proletarians. All
this included millions of Jews like the Marxist-Zionist
named Emma
Lazarus, who explicitly called for importing "wretched
refuse" in her poem "The
New Colossus," a very much beloved sonnet by her
kinfolk that is now inscribed on a crummy little iron plaque
stuck on the base of a grand statue donated to America by
the people of France. This statue was originally dedicated
to the "Liberty" earned by hardy, intelligent,
free, brave and self-sufficient people heavily sculptured
by "frontier Darwinism," and not by "wretched
refuse." Again, America's schizoid rhetorical and ideological
disparities in "The
Land of Contrasts" manifested itself once again.
The
quality and character of America's political institutions
deteriorated a quantum level in the decades following the
War Against Southern Independence, where the "politics
of envy," "patronage payoffs," and "wealth
redistribution" soon replaced the original republican
politics of "wise policy formulation" and "rational
process," all of which was in turn accompanied by the
rise of extremely selfish and vulgar Marxist-socialist labor
unions, Jewish mafia, ornate Robber Baron mansions, and
big city Catholic political machines. The principles of
limited government so beautifully expressed in the famous
Davy Crockett "Sockdolager!"
story became "Gone With the Wind." In time, the
majority WASP population that felt these values on an instinctive
level also became history.To
paraphrase 18th century French libertarian analysts (as
noted by Dr. Ralph Raico cited below), the "political
means" replaced "the productive means" and
the "tax-eating classes" gained the upper hand
over the "tax-producing classes." America became
a giant "neo-Jacobin bloat bag" where the real
objective of America's power elite was to "preserve
the union" (code-speak for "stay in power at all
costs," to include any tyrannical methods that can
be smoothed over by "democratic" rhetoric) by
figuring out ever more ingenious methods to deceive people
while shifting their money about in whatever way was necessary
to "preserve the system." The American state became,
as Frederic Bastiat so
famously put it, "the great fiction by which everybody
tries to live at the expense of everybody else."The
ultimate masters at this game on a global scale smelled
blood like the way "hungry fleas" might sense
a bloodied,
battered "dog" left by The American Lenin
and quickly flooded into America. As mentioned, millions
of Jews vectored in from Eastern Europe and elsewhere to
pile into America's largest cities in the late 19th century.
Having already become a major power in America behind the
scenes in railroads and oil in the mid to late 1800's, Rothschild
confederates set up America's privately
owned central bank in 1913 and grabbed control of major
media. The Washington "District of Criminals"
essentially became a glorified baby-sitting service where
politicians espoused Jeffersonian rhetoric for public consumption
on the one hand, while on the other hand behind the scenes
aided and abetted ultra high-level deception and looting.
This included shanghaiing America into unnecessary intervention
into a European fratricidal war (see my discussion of the
Balfour Declaration in my article "Thomas
Jefferson and the `Incredible Truth' about Bush Cabal Wise
Guys and False Flag Nukes") and financing the Bolshevik
takeover of Russia (Please see in Chapter
33 the commentary related to the embedded video "The
Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control
of America"). Tragically,
America's emergent New
Jerusalem and New
Babylon leadership in the early 20th century could never
control quite control it's insane greed and Neanderthal
hatred towards America's once highly productive white
majority. By the mid-1960's, this evil elite made no serious
effort to arrest what became the beginning of a long decline
in America's industrial base. At this same time, they also
opened up the floodgates of Third World immigration and
fast-forwarded the continued depletion of America's Nordic
genetic stock on a sociobiological level. The
failure to arrest the industrial decline and the race war
against WASP's fit hand in glove with each other, because
only WASP's and perhaps a few other frost-zone sculptured
gene pools have demonstrated a long term capacity to innovate,
delay gratification, follow rational processes, and implement
other measures necessary to build a productive industrial
base at a faster rate than resources are consumed by overall
population. The
poisonous attitudes of the alien power elite are manifested
in myriad other ways, not only through the "mainstreaming"
of hard-core pornography beginning in the 1970's to
destroy family values, but also through the introduction
of toxic additives in "GMO'ed" foods, vaccines,
and public drinking water --not to mention
the atmosphere itself. (Listen to Alex Jones on GCN
and John Stadtmiller at RBN and their expert guests for
more details). Eventually, states like Minnesota would report
childhood autism rates at 1 in 80 --which only decades
earlier was extremely rare. In this and myriad other ways,
the general American population was showing signs of getting
ever sicker and sicker.Libertarian
theory cannot explain any of this. In fact, it is so weird
and evil that it usually blows libertarian minds. In contrast,
most chapters on "parasitology" in sociobiology
textbooks handle this topic quite nicely, and you can too
once you accept the premise that man remains a part of nature
instead of removed from nature. Please see my "mutualism
vs. parasitism" online article for more background.
As
the beginning of the final "end
game" approached by the 1990s, America's
malevolent "New World Order" power elite resorted
to the most vile subterfuges imaginable as distracters,
such as false
flag attacks at Oklahoma City in 1995, New York and
Washington, D.C. on 9-11-2001, and London 7-7-2005. By 2005
they were going pedal to the metal to install the police
state and martial law control grids. In 2008 they came perilously
close to starting a
global nuclear war in South Ossetia as a gambit to cover
their tracks, and in 2009 they made a abortive run at global
depopulation mass murder through a swine
flu false flag pandemic.Nationalism
is about maintaining control of ones own destiny and protecting
vital cultural and ethnic-genetic interests. The Jewish
people, who have been despised everywhere they have gone
in the last three thousand years for being the most deceitful,
criminal, hypocritical, and money-grubbing of all races,
were able to not only find a "happy home" in America,
but also hijack the country's government and media and impose
their values everywhere. This does not say a whole lot about
American core cultural values --or the quality and strength
of "American nationalism." Instead
of proving that "this time it is different," the
"American experience" has really only proven that
"the
nature of the beast" remains the same on both sides
of the Atlantic. In
his 4 June 2010 article "This
Says It All," Justin Raimondo describes how the
U.S. Government was unwilling to issue even a peep of protest
after Israelis boarded a "Peace flotilla" in international
waters and murdered a U.S. citizen in cold blood, just like
it refused to protest when Israel tried to wipe out the
U.S.S. Liberty in 1967 on the high seas and blame it on
Egypt.Indeed,
Justin Raimondo is right --"this says it all."Despite
all this, there have been quite a few very astute American
observers who have tried to educate the public regarding
nationalist principles. While they have been unable so far
to turn the tide in favor of genuine nationalism, it is
fair to say that things would be immeasurably worse in America
if there was no one providing alternative viewpoints or
putting up any resistance at all. As
Tom Chittum observes in Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America, just wait
until the neo-Jacobin America empire finally comes apart
at the seams. Genuine nationalism will some day
return. It has to.After
all the sugar candy dreams promoted by Zionists, leftists,
and big government fanatics have finally evaporated, white
nationalism will be the only proven thing left that people
can hang on to that actually works. Just ask folks in the
former Soviet Union and former Communist Yugoslavia how
they finally had to circle the wagons to save themselves
from total obliteration and ruin.

Amerika
- Rammstein (VIDEO), which satires America with a
nihilistically self-destructive, militarized police state
"Civil
War Two"-related theme. Editor's Note: The video
I originally posted here was a very different visual interpretation
than the more MTV-compatible "standard"
version on YouTube. It was removed in Sept 2010 for
alleged "terms of use violation." It featured
a steady procession of Neanderthal-looking Jewish billionaires.
My caption: "Is this the real tune of "American"
nationalism today or is it more accurate to view this
as some kind of "Neanderthal Internationale"?
(Please see the table of contents excerpt for the special
"Revenge
of the Neanderthal" Barnes Review issue
below, as well as links in the Dr. William Pierce section
to the article "Who
Rules America? and the classic video "America
is a Changing Country." Why do you think most
anarcho-libertarians are too scared to touch these issues?)."
As a last note, there are other videos on the Internet
that try to use the "Amerika"soundtrack to satirize
other themes, often from a leftist perspective, such as
the "Obama
Nation homeland security police state," "imperial
militarist interventionism," "9/11 inside job,"
"moon
hoax and multiculturalist globalism."

The
following are some sample articles that explain
the Neanderthal background of Jews, and how
these hominids have been involved in a de facto
race war with Cro Magnon Man (most whites) for
tens of thousands of years preceding the official
creation of "Judaism" as religious
camouflage for skullduggery. For a complete
list of articles, please visit the Table
of Contents of the May/June 2010 special
issue of The Barnes Review.

REVENGE
OF THE NEANDERTHAL by Willis A.
Carto, "The truth about the Neanderthal
is a historical web that is finally being untangled.
. . ."

It
is probably fair to state that in terms of scope of audience,
and volume of publishing, Willis Carto has
done more "heavy lifting" for paleoconservatism
than most other activists on the Right. He founded The
Spotlight (1975-2001), which once achieved mass circulation
in the hundreds of thousands during the Carter administration,
an impressive achievement in the pre-Internet era at a time
when anything to the right of Winnie the Pooh was typically
in the cross-hairs of "mainstream" controlled media,
FBI COINTELPRO, or well-funded Jewish smear groups like the
SPLC and ADL (see Rev.
Ted Pike archive for more on this unregistered agent of
Israel and Zionist plutocracy). Find a brief bio here.
Carto founded The
Barnes Review in 1994, which covers "history
brought in accordance with the facts" and began publication
of the weekly newspaper American
Free Press to replace the Spotlight in 2001.
Carto
still hits home runs. For example, I include an online table
of contents for the "Revenge of the Neanderthal"
May/June 2010 Barnes Review in Appendix
VI of my Iceland series. Michael
Collins Piper has assembled An
Appeal To Reason that contains a wealth of Willis
Carto's writings. I
have always viewed the circulation numbers for Carto's publications
(Spotlight, American Free Press, and The
Barnes Review) as litmus tests for the general competency
level of the American public and its business elite to rule
themselves. These publications were always early to report
such outrages as the deliberate
Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967, Mossad-CIA
global drug dealing, and utterly criminal pork spending on
Capitol Hill. At their peak, Carto's publications have only
numbered tens or hundreds of thousands rather than millions
in circulation. This indicates how "dumbed-down,"
"apathetic," "childish," "brainwashed,"
and generally lacking in "republican virtue" a large
segment of the general public had become by the late 20th
century. Despite all this, Carto has continued to fight the
good fight, because as depressing as the lack of an effective
public response has been, if people like Carto failed to man
the barricades, things could always become immeasurably worse
in America. In the Gulag Archipelago and Two
Hundred Years Together, Alexandr Solzhenitsyn recollects
how Jewish Bolsheviks mass-murdered 60 million Russians. American
Free Press is home base to many outstanding journalists,
such as Michael
Collins Piper, John Tiffany, Pat Shannon, Jim Tucker,
Mark Anderson, and Victor Thorn who do outstanding work in
documenting the the New World Order, false flag attacks, the
police state control grid, and other threats to American sovereignty.
I
think that history will remember Carto very well.Links:Americanfreepress.net
and barnesreview.org.

Willis Carto at the American Free PressTown
Hall Event 13 Feb 2010 for
James Traficant

John
Stadtmiller runs the Republic Broadcasting Network
out of Austin, Texas whose slogan is "Because You
Can Handle the Truth." RBN serves as slightly
more paleoconservative electronic media counterpart to Alex
Jones and GCN. Stadtmiller's network hosts include Mark
Anderson (a star journalist for American Free Press),
Dr.
Rebecca Carley (who interviewed
this author about the swine flu epidemic on 5 Dec 2010),
Wayne
Madsen of waynemadsen-report.com
(a former Naval intelligence officer whose work I refer
to frequently in my Mission of Conscience series),
Rick
Adams, and other patriotic hosts. It also has the archives
of Michael Collins Piper, who broadcast from 9 Feb 2006
to 15 Dec 2010. RBN currently charges only $1.33 to access
its MP3
archives, which I think is well worth it. In fact, I
will go a step further. Even Alex Jones admits that he cannot
sit through a single mainstream media program these days
and not feel like he is being subliminally programmed with
a some kind of poisonous message that supports the New World
Order. How many other networks out there have the "truth
quotient" of RBN? How many other networks besides RBN
are willing to see if you can "handle the truth?"Links:republicbroadcasting.org.
This home page also provides an excellent source of breaking
news article links.

Michael
Collins Piper has been a leading journalist in
pro-American nationalist, populist alternative media for
decades. That alone is an amazing achievement. His first
edition of Final
Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy
came out in 1994, in the pre-Internet Dark Ages when such
exposes could be especially dangerous for a journalist's
health. Considering all the material witnesses to the JFK
assassination who have met untimely deaths, not to mention
American sailors who got murdered in broad daylight on the
U.S.S. Liberty in 1967 without hardly a peep of protest
by the U.S. Government, it took guts to openly accuse the
Mossad and its CIA-U.S. Government collaborators of orchestrating
the murder of President John F. Kennedy. Piper's
books do more than update us from where Henry
Ford, Myron
Fagan, Benjamin
H. Freedman, and other whistle-blowers regarding out-of-control
Zionist power left off. Zionism, a highly aggressive and
criminal form of Jewish nationalism, exists in a predator
vs. counter-predator relationship with any form of gentile
nationalism. When Zionism gets stronger, gentile nationalism
is always correspondingly weaker, and vice versa, just like
rat and cat populations in ecology models. In this back-handed
manner, Piper's books about Zionism instruct us more honestly
than most other sources on the sorry state of any form of
genuine American nationalism. America
First Books is honored to carry many Piper books as ebooks.
They include not only Final
Judgment, but also The
Judas Goats, The
New Jerusalem, The
High Priests of War, Best
Witness, and Dirty
Secrets. Piper's other books currently available in
soft-cover include The GOLEM, My First One
Hundred Days in the White House, Target Traficant,
and The New Babylon.Links:Author
archive page at americafirstbooks.com and mikepiperreport.com
(also Michaelcollinspiper.com). Mike
Piper used to broadcast on Republic Broadcasting Network
from 9 Feb 2006 until his last show on 15 Dec 2010. The
old shows are available in the RBN archive via subscription.Mike
Piper now has a free MP3 download broadcast site at:michaelcollinspiper.podbean.com.

Dr.
Matthew Raphael Johnson's work is a perfect example
of what I mean by the "international
nationalist" concept on the home page. One must
necessarily be exposed to numerous "case studies"
of different societies, cultures, and historical experiences
in order to understand how all the different variables that
affect successful social functioning come together, as well
as acquire a fresh perspective on ones own society and how
it fits it into a broader context. Dr.
Johnson
earned his Ph.D. in political science and is an expert
on Eastern European history. Although of Irish and other
northern European-related descent, he is a priest in the
Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and the author of The
Third Rome: Holy Russia, Tsarism and Orthodoxy.
His articles at rusjournal.com
and lectures on his Orthodox
Nationalist radio show address the necessity for "spiritual"
and "organic integrity" as well as "ideological
integrity" for a society to function adequately. Significantly,
Dr. Johnson claims that his political and religious views
have evolved to the point that they are very similar to
those expressed by the late Nobel Laureate Alexandr
Solzhenitsyn. Please
visit Chapter 32: "Neo-Con
Bloodying of the Russian Bear, and Putin vs. the New World
Order" of my Trilogy where I extensively
quote from the work of Dr. Johnson. I explain ways in which
Russia appears to provide some kind of bulwark of anti-New
World Order and pro-nationalist sanity as the rest of the
world patiently waits for America to transition out of its
current phase of imperial lunatic decadence. If nothing
else, Russia has punished certain criminal Zionist oligarchs,
resisted Israeli demands, and has also refused to surrender
its territory to invading Third World hordes. By American
standards (or rather the lack of them) this is way off the
New World Order path.I
have found Dr. Johnson's lectures on medieval Slavic history
and culture to be very valuable for many reasons. First,
for paleoconservatives who believe that human societies
reflect innate as well as learned traits, it is very helpful
to observe their behavior over many hundreds of years to
get a sense of "baseline functioning." For example,
in Part
I of my Iceland series I devote some space to discussing
libertarian tendencies among Nordic peoples that go back
to the Viking era and before. The small village leadership
structures, religious tendencies, and land ownership practices
in places like Ukraine and Russia are relevant towards understanding
their descendants today. From
a paleoconservative viewpoint, as one departs from historical
or natural norms, one adds "stress factors" to
a society that may ultimately result in its breakup or degradation
in social efficiency. (See the discussion of Tom Chittum's
Civil War Two below). This is consistent with the "constraint
analysis" approach that I address in Chapter
38 where one starts with proven models of functioning
systems. One then tries to understand how they change as
one alters variables that impact on "critical nodes"
and "process flows." In contrast, utopian maximalists,
who are over-represented by modern liberals and anarcho-libertarians,
seek to maximize particular variables like "personal
freedom" without any real concern for how these changes
impact on the overall system. "Libertarianism"
becomes "libertinism."
For an example of "maximalism," see "The
Folly of Maximalist Objectives" by William S. Lind.
Another
reason why I find Dr. Johnson's lecture series valuable
is that Eastern European history challenges many "comic
book" historical cliches that are fed to Americans
by their federalized education system and Jewish-controlled
national media. There have been many times when I have listened
to Dr. Johnson's descriptions of unfolding of historical
events, which invariably involve conflicts between the monarchy,
nobility, church, fledgling middle class, peasantry, and
serfs, and somehow my American "programming" causes
me to subconsciously expect Russian history to "zig"
in many places where it instead "zags." This challenges
me to think more deeply about all the different variables
that make a society work and influence its national destiny.
Last,
but not least, one can see similar patterns behind the continued
development of the police state and martial law control
grid in America and what happened in Soviet Russia. Furthermore,
Zionist neocons with a similar mentality to former Vice
President Dick Cheney still control American foreign policy.
They can still start a disastrous nuclear war. They have
already instigated a "dirty nuke" war by spreading
depleted
uranium all over Iraq and Afghanistan.New
Yorker journalist Seymour Hersh claims that Dick Cheney
planned an operation where U.S. Navy SEALs dressed as Iranians
would attack a U.S. ship to justify war on Iran in spring
2008. In addition, the article "New
Books Suggests Dick Cheney Wanted to Go To War With Russia,"
by Andrew Moran, 20 Feb 2010, notes that "As the South
Ossetia War was being fought between the Russian Federation
and Georgia in August 2008, then-Vice President Dick Cheney
pushed for the United States to engage in a military conflict
with Russia over its disputed invasion of the Georgian Republic,
suggests a new book by Ronald Asmus titled A
Little War That Shook The World, according to the
Raw Story." Without
question, Dr. Johnson does an excellent job of addressing
many very serious current issues. He goes well beyond merely
developing an academic appreciation of Slavic history.Links:rusjournal.com,
the Orthodox
Nationalist radio show on the Voice of Reason
network.

":Leaked
‘Machete’ Script Confirms Race War Plot.According to Infowars.com: "The film is dangerous
because it glorifies Machete as a hero, invoking his fictional
racial struggle alongside clear parallels to current events
and headlines ripped from topical news. We have already
seen episodes of violent attacks, declarations of violent
intent at protests (such as in
Arizona and Santa
Cruz, California) and demonstrable anger over attempts
as regulation, such as Arizona’s recent controversial
legislation..." This film is also consistent with predictions
made in Tom Chittum's classic work Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America.

Tom Chittum provides his own take on the "Mexican
Invasion" on RT in: America,
Born In Blood, March 25, 2010. YouTube caption:
"What started as a few outspoken people at town hall
meetings, turned into the tea party, they started to make
racial slurs and homophobic remarks about Congressmen. The
next step has been violence towards US lawmakers; its a
change in the expression of anger, one that has even been
predicted by some people." Tom Chittum explains how
this is just rearranging deck chairs on the RMS
Titanic compared to what is coming in the Southwest.
Please also refer to the Tom
Chittum author archive page.

When
Thomas W. Chittum first published Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America in 1996,
it sent shock waves through America on par with Dr. William
Pierce's Turner
Diaries. An
article in Instauration magazine in the late 1990's
(see link below) remarked that any talk about America breaking
up through "secessionism" or any other cause was
the ultimate "thought crime" in America. When
I wrote my publisher's
preface to the Jan 2007 ebook edition of Civil War
Two, the idea of hard core States Rights and secession
still had not sunk in on a nationwide scale. Flash
forward to "More
states join gun-rights case in Montana," Helenair.com,
13 April 2010 where "A growing list of states joining
the legal battle over federal gun control argued Monday
that Congress can’t regulate guns made and sold within
a state." Then there is "Gov.
Rick Perry: Texas Could Secede, Leave Union," AP,
Huffington Post, 15 April 2009 where "An animated
Perry told the crowd at Austin City Hall -- one of three
tea parties he was attending across the state -- that officials
in Washington have abandoned the country's founding principles
of limited government. He said the federal government is
strangling Americans with taxation, spending and debt."
Finally, there is "Miss
USA Contestant Supports Arizona Illegal Immigration Law"
by Kurt Nimmo, Infowars.com, May 17, 2010, where
Miss Oklahoma stated "“I’m a huge believer
in states’ rights. I think that’s what’s
so wonderful about America.” . The
titles to these articles alone mark a major sea change in
attitudes. Tom
Chittum has written many articles about nationalist issues
for The Nationalist Times and other sources, as
reflected in his author
archive. However, I think that just Civil War Two
alone illustrates an important concept that I comment upon
further in Chapter 38: "Pittsburgh
False Flag "Anarchists, Cyber Militia, and the Principles
of Info War," and this is the idea of a psychological
or ideological "turning movement." People must
first come to grips with the concept of secessionism as
a remedy for the doomed multi-racial, multi-cultural empire
before they can adequately grasp the importance of "popular
sovereignty" and what I call "genuine nationalism"
on a grass roots level. Just
like a karate master who tries to focus on one spot on a
brick in order to chop it in two, sometimes one really good
idea can collapse an entire phony ideological matrix. Tom
Chittum found that "sweet spot" in the "brick"
of neo-Jacobin imperial America when he helped Americans
visualize how the entire anti-racialist, anti-nationalist,
pro-Zionist, unlimited Federal government ideological matrix
could some day come completely apart at the seams, rather
than reflect some kind of Star Trek future. For
de-brainwashing purposes, the nonfiction work Civil
War Two is probably more palatable for most Yuppies
compared to the fictional drama The Turner Diaries because
it attacks the phony ideological matrix without describing
hypothetical scenes where white revolutionaries blow up
the FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., cut off the heads
of nonwhites for bounties, or subordinate themselves to
central planners who resemble "Jedi Knights" (see
my discussion of Dr. William Pierce below). Instead, whites
are mostly portrayed on the defensive as victims of nonwhite
racism. It is is nonwhites who secede first, such as Mexican
Aztlan activists, as noted in Tom Chittum's RT
interview that is also embedded on the author
archive page. Chittum
provides long term historical studies to underscore the
concept that as a dominant ethnic group undergoes a decline
process below 75-80% of the total population of a country,
overall social instability starts to accelerate to the point
that eventually the country will very likely either fission
apart, undergo a winner-take-all civil war, or experience
a repressive dictatorship to try to hold everything together
at all costs. (See the last chart in the "Six
Charts" section below). The growing instability
phenomenon is rooted in human nature, such as the instinctive
tendencies identified by Dr. Raymond Hall's landmark work
Zoological
Subspecies in Man, Mankind Quarterly, Oct 1960,
the tribalistic "Evolutionary Breeding Unit" concept
explained by the British anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith
in A New Theory of Evolution, or the ethnic-genetic
distance concepts addressed in Appendix
VI of my Iceland series. No amount of liberal propaganda
or centralized government suppression or manipulation will
overcome these facts of life over the long run. Contrary
to the Star Trek vision of the future, most multi-racial
societies that manage to hang together are not really fully
competitive societies over the long run in terms of self-sufficient
economic sectors and corresponding industrial, military,
and even social capabilities, but rather require many highly
"artificial" support systems or "unique situations"
to sustain themselves. These de facto "dependent subcultures"
often require a continuous infusion of leftist propaganda
by controlled major media to suppress conflict. They typically
depend on foreign aid or government welfare transfers. They
often have narrow economies reliant on natural resource
royalties like oil or the ability to exploit soft service
industries like tourism. Geopolitically, they typically
serve as trading posts or protectorates on fault zones between
great powers. As
one example, I lived for four years in Hawaii, and discovered
that "underneath the hood" this allegedly utopian
"Aloha state" where "everyone is a minority"
is a very artificial society, heavily dependent on a unique
tourist and service industry niche for one third of the
economy. At least another third is dependent on welfare,
military bases, and other government-related activity. Underneath
the surface there is plenty of potential "trouble in
paradise." Hawaii may not be quite as artificial and
narrow as Las Vegas, Disneyland, or a nudist colony, but
it is not a robust dynamo like a more homogeneous and fully
industrialized society such as Germany, Sweden, or Japan
either.Within
a few years more nonwhites will be born in America than
whites, and within twenty years, nonwhites will be the majority
of the overall population. The idea that America will be
as productive and viable with this new "diversity"
as it was with a 90% white population back in the 1960's
is a very brazen and evil lie perpetrated by an alien power
elite. This chutzpah lie has been brainwashed into
the minds of most Americans for decades through controlled
national media. In
his classic work The
Dispossessed Majority, Wilmot Robertson explained
the concept of "liberal minority coalition" politics
where one minority can have a rational motivation to encourage
leftism and ally itself with other minorities in order to
build its power base relative to a white majority. This
may be true up to a certain point, but Dr. William Pierce,
Dr. Revilo Oliver, and other racial nationalists depicted
in this section believe that the urge expressed by the Jewish
power elite to socially reengineer America --to include
off-shoring over 75% of its industry and real economy --
has been so persistent, so pervasive, and ultimately so
self-destructive that it defies normal logical reasoning.
Instead, one requires biological models which utilize "evolutionary
logic" to explain "parasitic behavior" rather
than "game theory logic" which explain "maximizing
rewards" in order to fully understand this phenomenon.
See, for example "The
Scorpion and the Frog" by Dr. William Pierce, July
2001, Free Speech.In
many ways, American "egalitarianism" in the last
century was a counterfeit form of equality, resembling more
the "equality" found among motley
pirate bands described in Republic
of the Pirates who equally divided up their booty,
rather than the longstanding "equality" found
among innately libertarian people in homogeneous northern
European societies. As long as America had a growing industrial
base that steadily created new real jobs and wealth, and
so long as America's westward expansion offered plenty of
new resources to divvy up so that different groups could
still get rich by working around each other rather than
fighting each other head to head, and finally, so long as
there were enough WASP's to provide the social stability,
idealism, and productivity necessary to economically support
Marxist groups and the "Redistributor Chief" imperial
federal government, this exploitation game could continue.
However, this game of musical chairs has now ended. Too
many musical chairs and WASP's are gone, and too many alien
groups continue to engage in their innately dysfunctional
behavior. To
help Chittum's message sink in, consider "Leaked
‘Machete’ Script Confirms Race War Plot"
by Alex Jones & Aaron Dykes, Prison Planet.com, May
13, 2010. What is even more telling about the utterly decadent
state of America today is that the Texas state government
gave the filmmakers millions of dollars to shoot this film
in Austin! The film is so extremely anti-white that even
Hispanic-American members of the film crew were shocked
and leaked a sneak preview of the script to Alex Jones.
Worse
yet, this horror story is beyond fiction. It could be coming
to your neighborhood sooner than you expect, particularly
after a major economic collapse. Alex
Jones thinks that the majority of Mexican-Americans who
have American citizenship appreciate the need to maintain
cooperative relationships with white Americans, even as
Mexico continues to slide downhill as a failed narco state.
He views the film as a probable PSYOP designed by a New
World Order power elite to create unnecessary divisiveness
in American society. He claims that many Mexican-Americans
are very good, loyal citizens and have gotten along very
well with Anglo Texans since the 1830's. But
would you take this "appreciation" to the bank
once ATM machines run out, grocery store shelves run bare,
and the dollar goes to zero? My
response to Alex Jones is as follows. On the one hand, I
have strong humanitarian instincts and am not out to stir
up unnecessary "divisiveness" or lord it over
other races. But on the other hand, I naturally prefer to
place priorities according to ethnic genetic distance, and
I deeply resent social engineers who try to impose artificial
social and political systems on me that induce me to form
unnatural alliances and unnatural enemies, all in the name
of helping them score quick bucks at the expense of the
long term ethnic-genetic interests --and even survival--
of myself and my own people.Rather
than feeling compelled to focus all their efforts on trying
to preserve some kind of multi-ethnic unstable status quo
in Texas, I believe that European Americans should feel
perfectly free to rediscover and rebuild their own indigenous,
cohesive, European folk communities. They actually worked
very well for America in the 17th-19th centuries, and they
can be made to work again. This does not necessarily imply
any kind of hatred towards Mexicans, but rather a healthy
desire by political correctness-brainwashed whites to come
home to themselves. Links:
Thomas
Chittum author archive page at americafirstbooks.com

Please,
whatever you do, read Dr. Lothrop Stoddard
for yourself in his own words and make up your
own mind. Don't let "cyber warriors" such
as Mossad or ADL operatives or other "political correctness"
individuals who have usurped much of Wikipedia and other
online sources "spin doctor" Dr. Stoddard for
you. Your common sense and daily personal observations will
be enough to show you that most of the trends that he predicted
in the 1920's have become all too true in our increasingly
unstable, fraud-infected, and rapidly decaying society.
Needless
to say, Stoddard was product of a very different era, back
when Henry Ford's auto dealerships handed out courtesy copies
of The
International Jew along with keys to the
car upon purchase. When Stoddard got his PH.D.
from Harvard, this august institution which was originally
established in 1636 by hard shell Puritan immigrants from
the most Nordic part of eastern England was still not so
heavily infiltrated by pro-globalist, pro-Rothschild-controlled
central bankers, and other anti-WASP subversives. Then
accelerating in the 1930's, dark forces began to "engulf
and devour" the "hallowed halls of academia,"
as documented in Keynes
at Harvard: Economic Deception as a Political Credo
by Zygmund Dobbs. Jewish pressure groups became successful
in preventing most book stores from carrying ThePassing
of the Great Race by Madison Grant, as
Jews worked feverishly behind the scenes to open up the
floodgates of Third World immigration -- a task they eventually
accomplished in the mid-1960's. Getting
back to Harvard, three of the most obnoxious recent examples
of Jewish subversion are professors
Noel Ignatiev, co-editor of Race Traitor magazine
that calls for the "abolition" of the white race,
Dr.
Alan Dershowitz, who has "advocated the issuance
of warrants permitting the torture of terrorism suspects"
in a transparent effort to "Israelize" American
policies in the phony war on terror (see Chapt.
12 about fake Bin Ladens and other hoaxes), and Dr.
Larry Summers, 27th President of Harvard University
from 2001 to 2006, who got Harvard embroiled in extremely
speculative positions that certainly earned fat fees for
his Jewish pals on Wall Street, but nevertheless:
"...by late 2008, those positions had lost approximately
$1 billion in value, a setback which forced Harvard to borrow
significant sums in distressed market conditions to meet
margin calls on the swaps. In the end Harvard paid $497.6
million in termination fees to investment banks and has
agreed to pay another $425 million over 30–40 years."Fortunately
many of Dr. Stoddard's landmark works are now online, such
as

One
of the most important insights provided by Racial
Realities in Europeinvolves its explanation of the substantial temperamental
differences between different racial and ethnic groups of
whites in Europe. Dr. Stoddard also explains how
"multiracialism" does more to foster instability
and degrade overall productivity than help a society. It
becomes much easier to see how the decline of WASPs from
an overwhelming majority to another minority in America
over the last 150 years can help gives rise to an Orwellian
government with strong police state tendencies and other
signs of Third World instability and reduced social efficiency.The
French Revolution in San Domingo (1914) is
in many ways Stoddard's racialist nationalist early 20th
century counterpart to Alex Jones' early 21st century libertarian
video Endgame:
Blueprint for Global Enslavement. Stoddard
explains the tragic sequence of events where the white French
planter class of Haiti (on the island known to Spanierds
as "San Domingo") decided to fully emancipate
the black slave population (over 90% of the population)
following the French Revolution. One thing led to another,
and blacks ended up savagely wiping out all the white people
on the island. Although rich in natural resources, Haiti
has been ruled ever since by savage black dictatorships
and perpetually remains one of the poorest countries in
the Western Hemisphere, despite periodic bouts of U.S. aid
and interventions with U.S. Marines. It should be plainly
obvious to anyone with an IQ above room temperature that
there is a lot more constraining "black advancement"
in Haiti than the usual leftist blatherings about environmental
factors and "oppression." I present the aforementioned
"Gen. Butt Naked" and his child-eating cannibal
troops in "A
Vice Guide to Liberia," as "Exhibit B"
for my argument, coming right on the heels of Stoddard's
works as "Exhibit A.".
.The
French Revolution in San Domingo is the archetypical
nightmare of what has also happened repeatedly to other
societies around the world as whites have yielded political
and military control to majorities of nonwhites. After passing
out political rights like handing out popcorn, instead creating
some kind of "kinder and gentler" and more "fair"
society, childishly naive whites have discovered that they
have really let go of the ears of a highly unappreciative
wolf. (Please recollect Thomas Jefferson's famous saying
about how Southern plantation owners had "a
wolf by the ears" in regard to slave emancipation
and racial integration issues). Two
of the most recent replays of the tragedy of Haiti have
involved the dispossession of whites in the former Rhodesia
and South Africa, coinciding with massive breakdowns of
what were once prosperous white-run societies. Please see
my South African and Rhodesia-related listings on my Obama
Nation web page, which include the following articles:

One
might argue that America's current trend towards complete
economic meltdown and bankruptcy also has similarities to
the Haiti tragedy, except in this case rather than being
in the position of white French planters who faced savage
black mobs who engaged in cannibalism and carried white
babies impaled on pitchforks as their "flags,"
America's declining white population now faces Mossad-CIA
gangsters and Rothschild-affiliated banksters who like to
conduct false
flag demolitions of major New York skyscrapers and suck
trillions of dollars out of the U.S. economy in unnecessary
foreign wars and banker
bailouts, while "soft-kill" poisoning the
country with chemtrails, tainted vaccines, and carcinogenic
and even radioactive food and water additives (see my false
flag pandemic web page). Actually the list of nefarious
activities by a near-psychotic Jewish power elite is almost
endless, to include outsourcing America's strategic industries
and best jobs, biologically replacing major portions of
the white population by advocating "lifestyle"
abortions while leaving open borders to tidal waves of Third
World immigration, promoting phony global carbon tax schemes,
pushing U.N. Agenda 21 global depopulation programs, overwhelming
America with hard core pornography, and heaven forbid whatever
else these humanoid parasites will think up next.Another
interesting variation of the Haiti tragedy theme with a
distinctly Jewish flavor involved the Jewish-Bolshevik mass
murder of over 60 million Russians during the Soviet era.
See Behind
Communism by Frank L. Britton, Two Hundred
Years Together by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn (German translator
John de Nugent informs me that parts of it are so unspeakably,
depressingly, shockingly evil that even his hard core right
wing nationalist German friends have a hard getting through
what Jews did to the Russians), or the Revenge
of the Neanderthal special issue of the Barnes
Review, whose table of contents is also listed further
up this web page.As
a final note on Stoddard, I find the Racial Realities
chapters The
Nordic Nordicand Alpinized
Germany particularly valuable, not only because
of my own personal involvement with Scandinavian American
groups, but because it defuses irresponsible Jewish Hollywood
propaganda that links Nordics with Nazi authoritarianism,
when in fact Nordics have been the global historical leaders
in republican government and pioneering democratic institutions
that guarantee human rights. However,
my general feeling towards Stoddard is similar to my feeling
towards people like William Simpson or William Pierce on
the racial nationalist side, or folks like Alex Jones, Dr.
Murray Rothbard, or Dr. Ron Paul on the libertarian side,
namely while they all make a lot of extremely important
points, and they all provide an excellent introduction to
various topic areas for neophytes, I also find them "necessary
but not sufficient." The real world has many added
layers of complexity and nuances. While Stoddard may be
correct in various generalities on a broad conceptual level,
there are usually plenty of exceptions to "the rule"
on the individualized or small group level. In
a full blown discussion of the Nordic character, one would
need explain how Nordics can be so marvelously level-headed
and rational in some situations (as Dr. Stoddard claims)
and in other situations be famous for their "berserker
rage." Also, if Nordics are so smart and so capable,
as Stoddard suggests, how is it that Jews could climb over
them in the power ladder in America in the 20th century?
In addition, recent DNA tests show that certain areas that
Stoddard identifies as "Nordic" such as Iceland,
Britain, and Scotland show a substantial portion of Celtic
genes. We need better distinguish between "Celts"
and "Nordics," one of many issues that Stoddard
does not address. Nor, for that matter, does he devote much
space to discussing Jews either in Racial Realities
in Europe.I
do not have space to delve into all these questions here,
although it is worth making a few observations in closing.
For example, in contrasting Nordics and Jews, Jews are much
better adapted to dense urban environments than Nordics,
which became the power centers in the 20th century. Whereas
Jews actually thrive in urban jungles, Nordics tend to find
then psychologically toxic. Nordics tend to do much better
in a dispersed homogeneous Nordic society with an indigenous
Nordic folk culture. In many ways, Nordics are like Panda
bears in a zoo where their fertilty rates drop if there
is not enough bamboo and other trappings of their natural
setting. Nordics also tend to be much more standoffish and
reserved, whereas Jews are generally superior at both overt
and covert social networking ("schmoozing," after
all, is a Yiddish word). Nordics typically project their
attitude of "reasonableness" on to alien peoples,
and expect others to live up to their own penchant for libertarianism.
Nordics are more likely to "live and let live,"
whereas Jews are much more aggressive about taking control
of people and situations (the "brokerage" or "middleman"
side of their character). Jews tend to have vastly more
fractured value systems, where they can easily advocate
leftism to outsiders to soften them up and keep them off
guard, while covertly practicing ferocious tribalism among
themselves to maintain cohesive strength. Lastly, Jews are
capable of acting as permanent covert 4th generation warfare
invaders (see my further discussion of Jews as the "Mongols
of covert 4th Generation Warfare" in Chapter
38), in which their standing "Mossad-CIA"
operations can not only systematically deceive their hosts,
but also infiltrate and seize control of central banks,
fiat money systems, mass media, and other strategic bases
of society. Over
the long span of history, Jews have always had an amazing
ability to seize financial power, choke out their competition,
and leverage themselves with deception. In contrast, Nordics,
with their sense of honorable behavior, plain-dealing, and
chivalrous fair play, find it very hard to believe that
unspeakably criminal-parasitic behavior can be taking place
at the highest levels of their society behind their backs
until it is often too late. Once the American dollar finally
goes to zero in a hyperinflationary blowout, and millions
of Americans begin to starve to death, it will be interesting
to see how many Americans finally wake up.As
it regards the "Libertarianism vs. Nationalism?"
topic of this web page, in comparing the character of Nordics
and Jews, we can identify an important tragic irony. Anarcho-libertarianism
seems to reflect the individualistic traits of a large proportion
of Nordic individuals. However, when Nordics project this
ideological tendency on to alien peoples like Jews, it actually
prevents Nordics from perceiving the alien nature of their
worst racial enemies and reacting in an appropriate and
timely manner.It
is true that anarcho-libertarianism stimulates individual
initiative and decentralization. These things support the
Nordic talent for technological innovation, which has always
been an important source of their economic power. It also
true that anarcho-libertarianism reinforces individual liberty
and human rights within the context of homogeneous Nordic
or Nordic-Celtic societies. However, in the context of a
multiracial society, anarcho-libertarianism can also be
Nordic's greatest source of self-deception and ideological
poison, because it usually always cripples them in competing
on a group racial level against Jewish-flavored "Mongols
of covert 4th Generation Warfare."I
believe that in a healthy Nordic or Nordic-Celtic tribal
society like Old Norway, Old Sweden, Old Iceland, Old Scotland,
or Old England, the natural ideology tilts towards paleoconservatism.
Anarcho-libertarian ideology can be like a smoke screen,
anesthetic or shoe horn trick that keeps Nordic peoples
asleep as aliens infiltrate their societies, with Jews lunging
for the top strategic bases, and German Alpines, Irish Catholics,
Italian Catholics, followed by more exotic peoples (to include
tens of millions of illegal alien Mexicans and Chinese in
the final waves) building up voting block majorities on
the proletarian side to seize power through leftist political
machines like the Democratic Party of the late 19th and
early 20th centuries. While
they were sleeping, the temperamental "DNA demographics"
behind both the American Revolution and Protestant Reformation
has eroded out from underneath America's once overwhelmingly
WASP majority, so now the new Nordic minority is finally
beginning to wake up to discover that that former "minorities"
no longer engage in "adaptive mimicry" of their
values. Worse yet, these "former minorities" view
Nordics with a mixture of envy and contempt, and proceed
to impose alien values on an official level -- such as with
the phony
"War on Terror," the
misnamed "Patriot Act," FEMA
Camps for "gun owners and returning veterans,"
and other police state measures (watch Jesse Ventura’s
Conspiracy
Theory – Police State & FEMA Camps)
-- that effectively reverse the American Revolution, Protestant
Reformation, Magna Carta, and just about everything else
Nordics hold dear --to include possibly their own physical
existence over the long haul. (See, for example, the 22
April 2009 article Will
Beautiful Norway be Snuffed Out? by Arthur
Kemp about one possible genocidal end game for a formerly
homogeneous Nordic country. See also the Chapter
6: Alpinized Germany in Dr. Lothrop Stoddard's
Racial
Realities in Europe about how Germany trended
towards stern authoritarianism once Alpines became the majority
following the catastrophic Thirty Years' War of the 17th
century).

William
Gayley Simpson, a former American Christian minister,
created one of the most moving "soul journey"
articles series I have ever read in the form of "One
Man's Striving" that I have posted to the Internet
in the Simpson
home page. As
I point out on my Religious
Crisis web page, "...If you liked W. Somerset Maugham's
"soul journey" novels such as The
Razor's Edge and Of
Human Bondage, but want something nonfiction that
might really knock your socks off from a radical right perspective,
please check this out."In
addition, Simpson's invaluable right wing classic Which
Way Western Man?, is now also available for free online
through this same home page. It is also an intellectual
heavy-hitter.One
of my frustrations in writing about my experiences working
with Capt. Eric May in the Mission
of Conscience
series about false flag attacks and Info War is that
one can get so overwhelmed with handling all the minutiae
of near term threats and unfolding news events that one
misses the forest for the trees. As a matter of fact, overwhelming
Americans with threats and ugliness to waste their time
or beat them into some other form of fatalistic acquiescence
is very much an active strategy of our New World Order enemies.
(Please see the 24
May 2010 article Oil
Spill = Illuminati's Covert War on America
by Henry Makow, Ph.D.)At
the beginning of Chapter 37 "`Operation
Blackjack,' The Kansas City, KS Nuke, and the Zombie March
Towards "Stalingrad II" I talk about "predictive
programming," "fear mongering," and inducing
"Stockholm
Syndrome" as PSYOP tools. This is where the broader
perspectives offered by sources such as "One Man's
Striving" and Which Way Western Man? can become
invaluable to help one get ones head above the muck of day-to-day
affairs. At some point, patriots have to go beyond simply
reacting to the latest outrages that our enemies throw at
us, and instead go on the counter-offensive with our very
own agenda. This can include having a personal vision of
some day creating a national homeland that openly and actively
supports the survival of ones own people -- to include the
survival of their indigenous religious and cultural values.I
think that most American nationalists agree with me that
Simpson's work has really helped them connect a lot of dots
on broad moral and spiritual as well as racial level. The
only thing that is missing are specific nationalist objectives,
such as the possible creation of specific ethno-states by
specific peoples on specific territories with specific cultural
characteristics and military-economic resources in North
America. Which Way Western Man? may not give you
such specific direction, but the title lives up to its name
in terms of helping one think about "Standard Operating
Procedure" from a broad nationalist conceptual perspective.Links:
William
Gayley Simpson home page.

Steve McNallen

On
my "Religious
Crisis" web page, I explain how I became
convinced that it is impossible to have a nationalist movement
with real backbone and traction unless one first resurrects
the indigenous religious and cultural values of ones ancestors.
After all, if you do not care enough about preserving the
religious "folk soul" of your own people that
stems from their ancient past, why would you be that concerned
about protecting their "ethnic-genetic
interests" going forward into the future, to include
protecting their economic, cultural, political, and even
military interests as well as their cultural and ethnic
cohesion?From
the viewpoint of abstract libertarian political theory which
views private property as the cornerstone of human liberty
(and libertarianism), as explained in great detail by Dr.
Murray Rothbard in his online
lectures and literature
archive, an indigenous culture and religion may be conceptualized
as a form of "group intellectual property." When
Jews sponsor theatrical productions where they "socially
reengineer" Odin, Thor, Zeus, Athena or another European
deity as a Negro
or some other racial type who is alien to indigenous
European religion, they are desecrating "white"
intangible property rights. (See boycott-thor.com
which protests Jewish Hollywood "social reengineering"
of European mythology). Not surprisingly, one can hardly
ever expect Jews to depict Yahweh as a Negro or some other
alien. As usual, extreme double standards prevail with the
self-Chosen.The
nihilistic and leftist national culture fostered by Jewish
controlled national media in America has also resulted in
outrages against the religious intangibles of Christians
as well, such as the government-funded "Piss
Christ" or the alleged "art work" titled
"Jesus
receiving oral sex" smashed by activist Kathleen
Folden. The
primary Jewish "holy book" Talmud claims
that Jesus
is boiling in hell in excrement and semen, and makes
innumerable other hateful allusions towards Christians as
lowly
"cattle" or goyim. Once again, extreme
double standards prevail with the Kosher crowd. One would
be hard pressed to find "art work" depicting a
head Rabbi "receiving oral sex" that would not
trigger an immediate uproar and strenuous efforts at suppression
by Jewish communities. Steve
McNallen is a former U.S. Army officer, originally from
West Texas, who has been a important pioneer to help European
Americans rediscover their indigenous European tribal religion
and give it the respect it deserves. He practices Asatru,
which is the "northern window" of an early proto-Indo
European religion, which also has such siblings as the "western
window" of Celtic Druidism, the "southern window"
of the Greco-Roman religion, and the "eastern window"
of the early Hinduism of the ancient Aryan settlers in the
Indus Valley. He is a former U.S. Army officer of Scottish
background originally from West Texas.McNallen,
like the late Asatru leader Sveinbjorn
Beinteinsson of Iceland, has also tried to maintain
mutually-respectful relations with Christians. A good starting
point to understand the philosophical framework his indigenous
Indo-European religion is The
Religious Attitudes of the Indo-Europeans
by Dr. Hans Gunther. Please also visit Steve's Asatru
Folk Assembly home page at runestone.org.
Sample introductory articles include:Welcome
to Asatru: A PrimerAsatru
FAQIndigenous
religion as interwoven with the indigenous culture of ones
own tribal ancestors. Indigenous religion evolves out of
their "folk soul" over time just like their common
law and natural culture. Study in one area necessarily requires
study in the other to see how the pieces of the jigsaw puzzle
interrelate. One
of the great tragedies for Americans of Scottish, English,
German, Dutch, or some other European ancestry is that most
of them have no real understanding of the native culture
of their ancestral homelands, and worse than that, what
little understanding they have is usually very distorted
and negative based upon massive disinformation promulgated
by controlled
national media. If I had more funding support, certainly
one very important project for me to undertake would be
to systematically review the histories and cultures of major
European countries and try to define their "indigenous
cultures" and religious values and what parts may be
considered "healthy" as moral, ethical, and cultural
compass points for European Americans as we continue to
battle all the filth, degeneracy, and alien infestation
that is currently drowning America. Some of the "yard
sticks" I would apply to test the viability of an "indigenous
culture" were laid out by Dr. Raymond Cattell in his
landmark books New
Morality From Science: Beyondism and Beyondism:
Religion From Science, as well as important
insights identified by Dr. Hans Gunther in The
Religious Attitudes of the Indo-Europeans
and William
Gayley Simpson in Which Way Western Man?
Lastly,
please find other links pertaining to the indigenous religion
revitalization concept on my Religious
Crisis" web page, to include my interview
with Sveinbjorn Beinteinsson of Iceland, who played a key
role in revitalizing the open practice of Asatru for the
first time in a thousand years.

The Japanese "get it." Shinto is the indigenous
tribal religion of Japan. This photograph, also depicted
on my Religious
Crisis" web page, was taken by Martin Fackler for
his March 19, 2007 New York Times article "Renewed
Interest in Japanese Who Died in Epic Battle."
His article had the caption: "Yoshitaka Shindo, grandson
of the Japanese commander on Iwo Jima, during the March
14 commemoration of the battle." This event included
the Japanese practice of pouring water over the memorial
stone to cleanse it, which has Shinto roots. Other news
reports have described Shinto priests returning to the island
to perform ceremonies. Iwo
Jima has been returned to Japan and now supports a Japanese
Air Base.
We're trying to "get it" as well. I appear (on
the right) with Steven McNallen (center) and attorney Michael
Clinton outside the Portland, Oregon federal court house
after I had filed a law suit on behalf of the Asatru Folk
Assembly to allow access to the bones of Kennewick Man for
both study by scientists and the performance of indigenous
Indo-European religious ceremonies by Asatruar. In opposition
to us, Jews, Indians, and Clintonistas wanted to
deny scientists access to the bones, claiming that the bones
had to be Indian, and therefore only Indian religious
rites could apply. Part of the alleged Indian religious
rites meant burying the bones forever before anyone could
seriously study them, thereby removing a potential threat
to the exclusive "victimhood" status claimed by
Indians (and Jews) that has resulted in lucrative Indian
gambling concessions and other political special privileges.
All of this showed great disregard not only for legitimate
scientific research, but also demonstrated complete insensitivity
towards our indigenous Nordic and Celtic religious and cultural
concerns. For more details, please see my Religious
Crisis" web page. Also, in recent years the evidence
that Caucasians occupied the Americas about two thousand
years before Mongoloid "Indians" has only grown
stronger, and furthermore it is very likely that Indian
invaders genocided the first white inhabitants. Hence, Indians
have no exclusive claim to "victimhood" status.
See the video "Ice
Age Columbus" for an interesting introduction to
this controversy.

Anarcho-libertarians tend to ignore religion by
making a religion out of "reason." In contrast,
since racial nationalists also focus on the genetic or instinctive
side of man as well as the environmental (or "reasoning"
or "learning") side, they tend to be much more
attuned to religion, folklore, culture, and customs that
emanate from that part of society that comprises an extended
living "organism." Just as anarcho-libertarians
claim they own their own bodies as their most important
individual "property right," so racial nationalists
claim they own the extended body of their own people as
their "group property right." The Odinist
published by Else Christensen between 1971 and 1992, provided
a gold mine of nationalist insights from wide variety of
perspectives that ranged from such areas as indigenous religion,
culture and folklore to politics, economics, and academia.
Please visit our "Else
Christensen and The Odinist" archive web
page for more background, to include links to sample back
issues.

Dr.
William L. Pierce (1933-2002), a former
physics professor at Oregon State University who later dedicated
his life to help save his own people and Western Civilization
from complete obliteration.For
an online list of articles, please see Metapedia.org listing
pages for Part
One and Part
Two. See also "William
Pierce: His Mission" by Kevin Strom for other links
at the end of the article.The
web site of the organization
he headed, the National Alliance, archives
articles from Jan 1995 to Aug 2002 (VIII, No. 8). It also
has National Vanguard Magazine articles for issue
number 118 and earlier.See
the article "Who
Rules America?" that is being continually
updated at the National Alliance web site. Anarcho-libertarians
are generally never this honest. The online video series
"America
Is A Changing Country" narrated by Dr.
Pierce is also a major classic.The
free ebook Fame
of a Dead Man's Deeds (PDF download here)
by Dr. Robert S. Griffin provides a good overview of Dr.
Pierce's life and philosophy. Pierce was also founder of
the Cosmotheist
Church, which found spirituality in the evolutionary
progress of whites within the context of an evolutionary
universe.As
mentioned elsewhere on this web page, the Jewish-British
Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli once stated words to the
effect that "In the long run, it is all racial."
That is also essentially the implicit viewpoint of the science
of sociobiology, namely that while animal behavior tends
to be "environmental" in the short run, in the
long run it reflects a "group genetic response."
An important contribution of William Pierce was to help
people think in terms of how their behavior not only impacts
on their own immediate gratification, but the kind of society
that will be created for their children, grandchildren,
and great grandchildren. Although
I never met Dr. Pierce in person, while acting as a stock
broker (1995-2005) I had a client who worked for him at
his headquarters in West Virginia. Dr. Pierce picked up
the phone first quite few times and I ended up having many
long conversations with him. I was always impressed with
the depth of his intellect. Regarding the eugenics issue,
Dr. William Pierce once stated in a personal letter sent
to me in the early 1990's words to the effect that "The
United States Government is the greatest enemy of the white
race that has ever existed." Of
course there are a lot of well-intentioned, patriotic Americans
inside the U.S. Government. A major problem is that government
on both federal and state levels has been hijacked by Zionists
-- and before that by neo-Jacobin imperialist Robber Barons
(during the War of Northern Aggression Against Southern
Independence). The hijacking of America by Mossad-CIA on
9/11 that I cover in Chapter
7 and elsewhere in my Trilogy reinforces this
point. As you watch the landmark video America
is a Changing Country below, Dr. Pierce's statement
to me will start to sound increasingly more plausible and
less extreme. Also, please take a look at "Katyn"
as an example of an alternative view of history suppressed
by controlled national media.

"America
is a Changing Country," narrated by Dr. William L.
Pierce. (51 min 46 sec; also available on YouTube beginning
with Part
1 of 11). Dr. Pierce died of a sudden onslaught of cancer
shortly after this video was first published in 2002.

Short Critique: As
an associate in the 1960's of George Lincoln Rockwell, a former
editor of the National Socialist Review, and translator
from German of Bolshevism
from Moses to Lenin: A Dialogue Between Adolf Hitler and Me
by Dietrich Eckhart, Pierce was heavily influenced by the
"German model" of political struggle, although he
claims in his article "The
Radicalizing of an American" in Best
of Attack! that he started out as a libertarian. By the
early 1990's, he had distanced himself from National Socialism
to the point that he stated in a National Alliance manual
that its members could claim that they were not members of
a "Nazi" organization. Nevertheless, Pierce still
promoted the idea of forming a monolithic pan-white organization.
The leaders of a white revolution in his fictional work The
Turner Diaries(written under the pen name "Andrew
MacDonald") consisted of a circle of wise men in robes,
resembling Star Wars Jedi knights, causing Lew Rockwell to
quip in one of his talks that he was not particularly anxious
to trade the central planning of one particular group (Zionists)
for another (whites) wearing robes. All
other things being equal, whites wearing robes may be a lessor
evil than Zionists wearing business suits since they have
vastly less ethnic-genetic distance with America's white population
in general, although I agree with Rockwell (I am talking about
Lew, not George Lincoln) that the happiest situation of all
is to rebuild America from the grass roots upward, with a
focus on organizing local popular sovereignty and stressing
the importance of preserving personal liberty. Nevertheless,
for individuals who are looking to de-brainwash themselves
from all the race-mixing and anti-nationalist propaganda in
America's Zionist-controlled major media today, the extremely
well-written works of Dr. Pierce remain timeless classics.
Pierce's
brand of white nationalism was heavily tilted towards pan-white
revolution led by authoritarian white organizations. He generally
ignored differences between white ethnic groups, such as the
innate individualistic streak that generally exists among
Nordic American Protestants as compared to the greater authoritarianism
of Alpine Catholics, or the role of various anti-WASP Catholic
collaborators in supporting Jewish power in big cities. Ironically,
Pierce advocated a style of white militancy that in a perverse
way could help FBI COINTELPRO, NSA wiretappers, DHS, and ADL
"justify" their bloated departments, while at the
same time taking the focus away from vast hordes of authoritarian,
rent-seeking, dogmatic, leftist-leaning Catholics who have
displaced WASP's throughout federal bureaucracies. For example,
Timothy McVeigh, who according to Alex Jones and many other
sources was a government agent, reportedly claimed that The
Turner Diaries helped inspire his alleged truck bombing
of the Oklahoma City Murray Building. In actuality, only internally
placed explosives were capable of taking off the face of the
building. See my discussion of the McVeigh subterfuge in Chapter
17 of my Mission of Conscience series about how
this likely false flag event was exploited to unfairly discredit
American militia. Pierce
justified the white revolutionary and urban guerilla tone
of The
Turner Diaries and his subsequent work Hunter
(also written under the pen name Andrew MacDonald) by claiming
that these fictional works proved to be highly effective ways
to reach a mass audience, especially prior to the advent of
the Internet.There
are many different ways to skin a cat. An alternative approach
to combat excessive Federal and Zionist power is to promote
the nonviolent revitalization of existing European ethnic
groups and State's Rights secessionism, such as what did in
fact exist and proved effective in the early 19th century.
Given the realities of Federal and ADL spying and false flag
manipulation, "swarm tactics" utilizing many different
groups with many different styles and approaches may be more
effective than trying to build monolithic organizations that
can be easily infiltrated and hijacked. Grass roots political
organizing and ethnic community redevelopment is always a
necessary prerequisite before any other kind of militant behavior
becomes feasible any way. For example, the Communist Viet
Cong spent about five years focused on grass roots political
organizing in South Vietnam and purposely avoided combat before
launching into the next phase of revolutionary struggle. In
addition, keep in mind that in a healthy white community,
where local law enforcement has not
been thoroughly federalized and militarized by a Mossad-CIA-controlled
Big Brother, citizens are more than happy to augment police
as volunteers, vigilantes, or posse, and enthusiastically
support their local sheriff. Last, but not least, it is probably
more likely that America will come apart at the seams and
form separate countries than some monolithic political party
will be able to "save the empire." In the long run,
even if we get a military dictatorship that tries to hold
the U.S. together at all costs, it will likely fail. We
cannot necessarily trust the Zionist establishment and military
industrial complex to manage a wise, peaceful, and rational
secession process. They were not particularly wise about the
way they got us into our current mess, so the jokers are wild
regarding how we are going to get out. We need to keep in
mind that the Mossad-CIA establishment has become so perverse
that it actually welcomes violent attacks to justify installing
police state and martial law control grids (to include locking
down the Internet); so much so, in fact, that it has already
engaged in numerous false flag terror operations against its
own citizens, as documented in my Trilogy.
So long as we still have a free Internet that continues to
wake people up, there is no need to take the bait and trigger
the police state mousetrap.Although
my own personal views on the Second Amendment and the Jeffersonian
right of revolution are somewhere to the right of the National
Rifle Association and Gun
Owners of America, I still believe strongly that we have
to completely exhaust all peaceful, legal means before resorting
to the "Appeal to Heaven." Violence can have many
very tragic unintended consequences, particularly if military
forces start spreading depleted uranium all over North America,
or the Zionist elite uses violence as a pretext to invite
millions of U.N. soldiers --to include millions of Red Chinese
military personnel -- to come into America to replace American-born
military and police. The Zionist elite has already been practicing
slow genocidal replacement of white Americans for decades
through their open borders policy with Mexico and other nonwhite
countries, not to mention their Wall
Street coup de etat against the U.S. government and domestic
industry, and use of "soft kill" chemical warfare
waged through food
and vaccine
additives.Many
patriotic groups have in fact wised up and are using more
sophisticated approaches than in the past. This now puts the
spotlight on the government and Zionist groups as key predators
who frequently say stupid things and overreach themselves.
As an example, in Chapter
28 I talk about how DHS Director Janet Napolitano tried
to demonize "groups opposed to abortion and immigration"
and how the Pentagon tried to demonize "protestors."
One of the most "lunatic" moves in recent history
by increasingly "federalized" police forces seeking
to condition the American public to accept absolute tyranny
involved the police snatching of a baby belong to Mr. and
Mrs. John Irish because the father had purchased some guns
(perfectly legal) and had "associated" with "Oath
Keepers," an organization that has as its members vast
numbers of sheriffs, policemen, and military around the country.
See the 11 Oct 2010 article "CONFIRMED:
Court Did Rely on Oath Keeper Association to Take Baby"
by Stewart Rhodes. As
these kinds of outrages continue, the general public will
increasingly view victims as "martyrs" rather than
as "misfits," and to borrow an "Obamaism,"
a ground swell popular sentiment finally will finally produce
"change we can believe in."For
people who are completely ignorant about ideology and politics
who want a good introduction, I would recommend initially
dividing ones time about 50-50 between the works of Lew Rockwell
to see a libertarian side, and Dr. William Pierce to see a
racial nationalist side. (I say this with the reservation
that it is hard to select any one individual who adequately
represents either point of view; for example in terms of explaining
anarcho-libertarianism, I think that all the other sources
I have mentioned offer important insights). In
Chapter 29 "Candidate
Klock, The Spook Nuke Threat and the Ron Paul Libertarian
Revolution" I explain why I view Ron Paul libertarianism
as "necessary but not sufficient." I have always
felt the same way about Dr. William Pierce's racial nationalism.
If you can reconcile both viewpoints, "You'll be a Man,
my son!" (To paraphrase Rudyard's poem "If...")Even
if one wants to identify oneself as a hard core racial nationalist,
one still needs to study libertarianism for at least two reasons:
(a) The American Revolution was fundamentally a libertarian
revolution, and it is a longstanding political tradition in
America to at least reference or pay lip service to libertarian
ideals even if they have been totally degraded and perverted
by Jews, other aliens, and government bureaucrats and (b)
the libertarians at the Mises Institute provide an outstanding
free education in classical economics, which is invaluable
background for approaching American business people and other
entrepreneurs. Business people are often scared that nationalists
will bring with them more burdensome government regulation
and taxation. One needs to be able to explain to them how
over the long run nationalism can help preserve the white
middle class and a white entrepreneurial environment, all
of which in turn means less taxation, less regulation, and
less overall Big Brother over the long run.Sample
Pierce-related videos2011-10-24
(upload date) Dr.
No - William Pierce documentary (video) 2011-10-15
Dr.
William Pierce addresses the National Alliance (April 5th,
1998 - Parma, Ohio) (video) (1:07:48)2011-09-08
Dr.
William Pierce: What has happened to us?2011
Why
Marriage fail today - Dr William Pierce1996
Dr.
William Pierce interviewed on CBS 60 Minutes
[Ed. Note: In regard to its references to the Oklahoma City
bombing meant to discredit Pierce and the militia movement,
even Alex Jones has discussed overwhelming evidence that the
Oklahoma City bombing was a false flag operation run by Feds
and that Timothy McVeigh was a Federal operative. In Chapter
17 of my Mission of Conscience series
I provide evidence by Mike Piper that the Mossad and allied
organizations like the SPLC and ADL were key ringleaders].
[Undated]
Dr.
Pierce TV. An excellent collection of videos
on a web page with superb illustrations of Dr. Pierce speeches.
Criticisms
of Dr. Pierce:Did
William Pierce run a ZOG False Front Organization? A Brief
History of the White Nationalist Movement -- Dr. William Pierce
and the National Alliance, Covington's Forum,
whitenationalist.org. This web page includes the sympathetic
work I
Remember Dr. Pierce by Kevin Alfred Strom2011-02-17Harold
Covington Calls Dr. William Pierce a Federal Informant,
noncounterproductive.blogspot.com

Eight Charts That
Seriously Challenge
the Modern Liberal and Anarcho-Libertarian
Philosophical Paradigms

Extroversion

Mixes easily, affable, likes to
be the center of attention

61%

Conformity

Respect tradition and authority, follows the
rules

60%

Worry

Easily distressed and frustrated, feels vulnerable
and sensitive

55%

Creativity

Tendency to become lost in thought and abstraction

55%

Paranoia

Keeps to oneself, feels exploited, thinks "world
is out to get me"

55%

Optimism

Confident, cheerful, upbeat

54%

Cautiousness

Avoids risks and dangers, takes safe route even
if more difficult

51%

Aggressiveness

Tends to be physically violent, has a taste
for revenge

48%

Ambitiousness

Works hard at setting and achieving goals, a
perfectionist

46%

Orderliness

Plans carefully, tries to make rational decisions

43%

Intimacy

Prefers emotional closeness

33%

This chart was taken from the April 13, 1987
U.S. News & World Report article "The
Gene Factor." The Minnesota Center for Twin and
Adoption Research compared hundreds of identical twins
against the general population and analyzed statistical
variation. The percentages depicted above show how
much human traits are determined by heredity. Some
sources estimate that human intelligence may be as
much as 80% genetic. Even "heterosexuality"
and "homosexuality" and "altruism"
and "selfishness" have significant genetic
components. Please see my "Environmental
vs. Genetics" article.

Human societies and individuals have a strong
biological or "instinctive" component that
one ignores only at ones own long term peril. The
"Bioresponse"
conceptual diagram from Sociobiology:
The New Synthesis by Dr. Edward Wilson conceptualizes
"environmental" behavior as a short term
individual and group adaptive response, whereas the
longer term "adaptation" is viewed as a
"group genetic response."

Genetic Distance Chart taken from Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza's
1994 book History and Geography of Human
Genes. (See also "Ethnic
Genetic Interests" by Michael Rienzi, Feb
2003 American Renaissance).
Humans have evolved as tribal "evolutionary
breeding units" or "EBU's," according
to the late British anthologist Sir Arthur Keith
in A
New Theory of Evolution. According to Keith,
inter-tribal competition is beneficial on a genetic
level just as competition between small businesses
is important on an economic level. Small companies
create most new jobs, innovation, and sources of
new real wealth compared to large corporations.
On the tribal-evolutionary level, "nationalism"
is a way for EBU's to preserve genetic competitive
as well as cultural advantages, much like the way
small companies protect their tangible and intangible
assets (to include "intellectual property"
and "trade secrets") that preserve "key
success factors." Conversely, tribes that fail
to preserve their genetic and cultural integrity
can become so dysfunctional that they become enslaved
or genocided by other groups after falling into
"apostasy" (a "Biblical" term)
or various forms of "bankruptcy" (a "business"
term). Kevin Strom noted in his article "Multiracialists
Are Crazy, Part 3" that:

The
picture painted is not one of panmixia, but of
races evolving away from each other, away from
the average or center, becoming more diverse in
the true sense of the word, more different. This,
too, is in accord with both common-sense observation
and the laws of evolution, which posit racial
divergence and separation as one of the very engines
of Life itself.

Genetic basis of altruism diagram, from Sociobiology:
The New Synthesis by Dr. Edward Wilson. Since
"altruism" has a genetic as well as environmental
basis, altruistic human groups have to be careful
to reproduce their own kind to preserve these traits.
Altruism invested in the children of alien peoples
can actually become a form of parasitism that draws
down the pool of altruistic genes and structural integrity
of the host population. Therefore, interracial adoption
may have catastrophic consequences over the long run,
despite the "good intentions" of adoption
agencies in the short run. This is especially true
if a human gene pool high in innate altruism (such
as Nordics, who have a strange tendency to be nicer
towards alien peoples than their own kind) adopts
and raises the children of a gene pool rich in criminal
(parasitic) traits, such as Jews (towards outsiders,
that is; towards fellow "Members of the Tribe"
Jews are very altruistic).

Different human populations have different
distributions of innate traits along a bell-shaped
curve. These curves are often skewed by evolutionary
factors, such as hard winters that tend to kill off
less intelligent people in colder areas of the planet
and push the bell-shaped curves to the right (towards
higher intelligence) in regard to such traits as technological
adaptability (in regard to making winter survival
gear) and a capacity for delayed gratification (laying
up provisions in preparation for coming winters).
Civilizations begin to collapse when people on the
left side of the curve outbreed people to the right,
miring the overall society in a rising level of overall
incompetence. In regard to the black vs. white curves
above, when whites interbreed with pure blacks, the
resultant gene pool loses over 90% of the people with
IQ's over 130, too sharp a blow to sustain any advanced
technological civilization. Biological differences
between blacks and whites not only involve skin color,
but major internal anatomical differences, to include
the degree of average cranial capacity, cerebral folding,
and frontal lobe to anterior lobe ratios, all of which
correlate with intelligence. In addition, miscegenation
quite often does not get rid of "racism,"
but instead produces a new group of people who act
like a whole new race with their very own brand of
racism and in-group protectiveness. For example, when
whites have mated with blacks or Indians in Latin
American countries, they have formed mulatto and mestizo
groups that swing back and forth politically between
the founding groups and often act like their own separate
interest groups. In other words, interracial marriage
can actually increase "racism"
and other inter-group competition in a society, rather
than reduce it. For further discussion, please see
my "Environmental
vs. Genetics" discussion.

In
his landmark book My Awakening,
Dr. David Duke provides an excellent summary of the
selective differences between frost zone and sub-Saharan
African conditions (p. 93) that have resulted in the
different bell-shaped distribution curves of genetic
traits that is depicted above.

Prehistoric
European-Asian Conditions

Prehistoric
Sub-Saharan Africa

complex-sturdy shelter-critical

minimal shelter needed for survival

winter —
extremely harsh climate

no winter —
comfortable climate

warm, well-made clothing —
critical

no clothing required for survival

ability to make/control fire —
critical

fire not required for survival

long periods of resource deprivation

resources more abundant

periods of little vegetation, few small animals
or birds —
hunting necessary

promiscuous behavior resulting in fights often
leads to death of mate and children

death in fights from sexual competition not
critical for survival of mates and children

Civil War Two Diagram(see description below)

Largest

Largest

2nd

3rd

Nation

Group

%

%

%

Status

Netherlands

Dutch

99

1

Portugal

Portuguese

99

1

Austria

Austrian

99

1

Greece

Greece

98

2

Italy

Italian

98

Poland

Polish

98

1

1

Norway

Norwegian

97

Denmark

Danish

97

1

Albania

Albanian

96

2

Hungary

Hungarian

96

2

1

Finland

Finnish

94

5

1

Czech Republic

Czech

94

4

Ireland

Irish

94

3

Germany

German

93

2

Sweden

Swedish

91

3

France

French

91

5

Terrorist war

Slovenia

Slovene

90

3

Armenia

Armenian

90

3

2

Civil War

Romania

Romanian

89

7

2

Slovakia

Slovak

87

11

1

Bulgaria

Bulgarian

85

9

6

U.K.

English

82

10

2

Russia

Russian

82

3

3

Civil War

Lithuania

Lithuanian

80

9

7

Belarus

Belarussian

78

13

4

Croatia

Croatian

75

12

1

Civil War

Switzerland

German

74

20

4

Spain

Spanish

73

16

8

Terrorist War

Ukraine

Ukrainean

73

22

Georgia

Georgian

69

9

7

Civil War

Macedonia

Macedonian

67

21

4

UN Occupied

Estonia

Estonia

65

28

3

Moldavia

Moldavan

64

14

13

Occupied

Serbia

Serbian

63

14

6

External War

Belgium

Flemish

55

33

1

Latvia

Latvian

52

34

5

Bosnia

Moslem

44

31

17

Civil War

Table 3b:
European nations, arranged by majority percent.

Table
3b. above is taken from page 140 of Chapter Fifteen:
"The Bloody Lesson of Tribal Europe" in
Tom Chittum's classic work Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America
(carried as an ebook by America First Books). The
data reflects the world as it appeared to the author
when the book was first published in 1996. Chittum
makes the case that as a dominant ethnic group drops
below somewhere around 75-80% of a total population
-- all other things being held equal-- the odds start
to skyrocket that the level of social efficiency will
plummet as centripetal forces get the upper hand over
centrifugal forces, and the society becomes increasingly
at risk of fissioning apart at the ethnic, racial,
or even class warfare seams. Chittum
begins his chapter "The Bloody Lessons of Tribal
Europe" with the following comments:

When
will Civil War II actually erupt? There is no scientific
formula or mathematical equation that will give
us the date. Instead, we must turn our attention
to the demographic forces propelling us toward Civil
War II, our ongoing transformation from a stable
monoethnic nation into an unstable multiethnic empire.
Not all history can be explained by this single
engine of demographic transformation. Other factors
can and do decide the boundaries and fates of empires
and nations. However, the concept of nationality
has been the dominant historical factor, at least
since the industrial revolution. The more monoethnic
a nation is, the less chance a secondary tribe will
break off and form a new nation, or unite with their
co-ethnics in an adjacent nation. The more monoethnic
a nation is, the less likely a neighboring country
will try to carve off a slice inhabited by its co-ethnics
as Nazi Germany seized the Sudetenland of Czechoslovakia.
The more monoethnic a nation is, the more likely
its citizens will unite and fight foreign invaders,
thus again increasing the chances of territorial
integrity. To
be sure, ethnic tensions and even genocide can and
do occur in relatively monoethnic nations, such
as the genocide of the Jews and others in Germany.
[Editor's Note: Please see
Chapt. 34 of the Mission of Conscience
series for some important qualifying comments about
the history of "Jewish genocide"] However,
it is the internal stability and territorial integrity
of nations that is the focus of our concern. The
more usual case is that a secondary tribe dominant
in one region breaks off and forms a new nation.
Nationalism (tribalism, if you please) is the relentless
historical force that has shaped the current map
of Europe. The tread of imperial armies has also
changed the map of Europe, but empires are like
great ships — when sunk they remain sunk.
Tribal-based nations, on the other hand, are historically
buoyant — pushed under they resurface time
and time again...

On
page 140 Chittum summarizes the historical data:

The
lesson is clear: The more monoethnic a European
nation is, the more likely it is to be peaceful
and stable. The more multiethnic a European nation
is, the more likely it is to experience tribal civil
wars. There is simply no real arguing with this
brutal fact. The lesson here is that the likelihood
of a minority group having a go at a military divorce
from the nation increases with its chances of success,
and its chances of success increase with its percentage
of the population. Consider the most multiethnic
nation in Europe — Bosnia. Bosnia was literally
born fighting in 1991, and this civil war has produced
more dead than any other of the recent wars in Europe.
The most multiethnic European nation produced the
most multiethnic dead. Let me say that again: The
most multiethnic European nation produced the most
multiethnic dead. If there had been
only Moslems residing in Bosnia, there would have
been no civil war in Bosnia. Is
America a multi-tribal country and therefore unstable?
With each and every passing day, more and more Americans
of all ethnic groups are perceiving their tribal
affiliation as more self-definitive and more important
than their common American nationality. By this
measure we are increasingly unstable. More
bad news: Of the European countries, the median
size of the most numerous ethnic group is 89%. In
America, the most numerous ethnic group (the English-speaking
whites) is only 75% of the total population and
falling. By this measure, America is again not as
internally stable as most European nations. Twelve
European nations have primary ethnic groups that
are 75% or less of their total population. Seven
of these twelve nations are fighting wars, are occupied,
or have internal secessionist terrorists. More
bad news: Of the European countries, the median
size of the second largest ethnic group is 5%. In
America, our second largest ethnic group (the blacks)
is 12%. By this measure, America is again not as
stable as most European nations. Twelve European
nations have secondary ethnic groups that are 12%
or more of the total population. Four are fighting
wars, two are occupied by foreign troops, one is
fighting internal terrorists...

Another
important conceptual area involves grasping how the
process of group survival involves keeping many important
social elements in tact so that they are mutually
supporting. It is hard to survive as a libertarian
if one does not have the support of a certain critical
mass of like-minded people who can help one defend
ones rights. The
anarcho-libertarian viewpoint that focuses on the
individual is simplistic, as are "Asiatic despotic"
models at the other extreme that focus on the importance
of people subordinating their individual interests
for the benefit of the group, scoffed at by many libertarians
as a form of "collectivism" or even "Asiatic
despotism." Historically,
Western societies have viewed individual initiative,
creativity, innovativeness, and courage in defense
of property as a sign of heroism, whereas many Asian
societies have historically viewed individual expression
in confrontation with group needs or with a centralized
authority as a sign of "immaturity." In
reality, this is not a black or white issue where
the "right answer" is weighted heavily towards
either individual needs or group needs. Rather, the
issue really involves making appropriate trade-offs
between individual needs and group needs, depending
on the situation. After all, one not only requires
a critical mass of mutually supporting like-minded
people to simply survive, but also to have enough
power to determine ones own destiny on a wide variety
of political, economic, ethnic, racial, religious,
and other social issues. The
ability of any group of humans to control its own
destiny is called "sovereignty," and the
grass roots version of this is called "popular
sovereignty." No
matter whether one is speaking about a Western society
such as Iceland with strong libertarian traditions
that lean towards individualism, or certain Asian
societies that have historically leaned towards "collectivism,"
the bottom line is that "sovereignty" is
a "team sport" everywhere one goes. When
any society loses too many elements that enable it
to retain vital sovereignty rights, it runs the risk
that some alien group will take it over and marginalize
it, enslave it, or even ultimately genocide it. A
group that retains considerable sovereignty rights
and strives to perfect them is typically thought of
as a "nation," and the process of perfecting
these rights is called "nationalism." Conversely,
a group that has allowed these rights to become seriously
eroded and no longer consciously seeks to reverse
this situation is often referred to as a "dependent,"
"retreatist," or even "degenerate"
subculture.

Although
I am certainly not out to push Bible dogma (quite
to the contrary, as explained in my own religious
articles listed in my author
archive and on the Religious
Crisis web page), it is hard to find a more perfect
example of this concept than the Old Testament
Book of Judges. In this instance, ancient Hebrew
"nationalism," "law," and military
morale were inextricably tied in with religion. Therefore,
when people turned from the faith of their ancestors,
they were also turning away from elements that helped
provide nationalistic cohesion and sovereignty. The
Book of Judges continually provides examples where
ancient Hebrews repeatedly fell into "apostasy"
(which included turning away from the tribal deity
Yahweh towards "Baal worship") and then
got taken over by their enemies, only to be repeatedly
rescued by a hero (or a "Judge") who reflected
the ancient religion and traditions. Each of these
"Judges" (or "nationalist heroes"),
who included famous names like Gideon and Samson,
helped rally their people to recover greater self-determination.
(Admittedly, scholarly sources such as The
Invention of the Jewish People by Dr.
Shlomo Sand question the historical accuracy of
Old Testament books like Judges, but nevertheless
the underlying themes behind such works remain powerful).
A
hostile takeover can be either overt, such as through
a sudden military invasion, or it can be accomplished
gradually by stealth. (See Chapter
38 where I explain how historically,
Jews in control of central banking and other high
finance have often acted like a "CIA in search
of a country" or as the "Mongols of covert
4th generation warfare"). In
Chapter
6 of my Mission of Conscience
series, I discuss the sovereignty concept in greater
detail. The following is an extract:

The
elements that political leaders must pull together
in order to achieve sovereignty on a national level
are analogous to the McKinsey “7-S”
factors for small company success detailed in the
bestseller In
Search of Excellence by Peters and Waterman.
They
involve a combination of intangible as well as tangible
elements that must reinforce each other in order
for a group to function effectively in a competitive
world.

Components
of the famous “McKinsey 7-S” paradigm;
and a comparison of corporate and nationalist applications

·Strategy:Game plan for building a competitive advantage
over competitors.Nationalist
version:Coordination of foreign and domestic policy
to optimize economic growth, military strength,
citizen prosperity, and national self-sufficiency.

·Structure:Degree of centralization vs. decentralization
in management hierarchy, importance of staff vs.
line officers Nationalist version:Degree of government size and intervention
in economy compared to the size of entrepreneurial
infrastructure and private ownership.

·Systems:Standard operating procedures, incentive
systems, and the use of data processing automationNationalist
version:Political, business, military academic processes
for selecting and promoting talent and systematically
handling operations

·Shared Values:"Superordinate goals" that
transcend immediate profit-loss concerns and provide
unifying long term vision and long term loyalty
Nationalist
version: Interplay of shared religion, culture,
heritage, and ethnic-genetic interests that promote
patriotic sentiment.

·Staff: Special problem-solving capabilities
and degree of leadership depth provided by broader
management team Nationalist
version:Various form of institutionalized excellence,
degree of globally competitive brain trust

·Skills: the actual skills and competencies
of the employees working for the company. Nationalist
version:General educational level and competencies
offered by work force.

A
good thought experiment to understand how the pieces
of the “sovereignty” jigsaw puzzle must
come together in order to achieve success might
involve a scenario where you are part of an oppressed
group that suffers under an intolerably evil imperial
government.How does one go about organizing a separatist
movement and alternative government that eventually
forms an independent state that is liberated from
the evil overlords forever?Obviously
one needs money and other forms of economic power
to buy weapons and supplies.One needs a shared culture and values to
motivate fellow patriots to work together and risk
their lives for the cause. One needs to control
ones borders to keep imperial troops or spies and
infiltrators out.One needs like-minded people manning the
strategic bases of ones rebel society, such as major
media, major corporate positions, and ones shadow
provisional government.One will probably need supplies from foreign
powers, just like when Americans went to the French
for aid during the American Revolution.(Conversely, the Confederacy failed in large
measure because if failed to gain the support it
expected from France and Britain
, and was further defeated by Russia
’s fleet support of the Union Navy).

Another
approach besides using thought experiments is to
examine historical examples of viable “resistance
communities” and try to deduce their characteristics.Here are some examples:

a) New Englanders at the
time of the American Revolution, pure WASP’s,
descended from Puritans and pro-Parliament side
of English Civil War.Most able bodied males were members of local
militia (“Minutemen”). Long historical
ethnic memory, extensive family ties.
b) Watauga settlement, eastern Tennessee
, during the American Revolution.Provided “over mountain man”
militia that played key role in defeating British
at King’s Mountain.Simultaneously defeated Cherokee tribes and
produced first governors of Tennessee
and Kentucky . Most able bodied males were members
of local militia and had long historical ethnic
memory and extensive family ties.
c)Mostly
WASP settlers in Texas who beat the Mexican Army and ran the LoneStarRepublic in the 1840’s.Strong pioneer culture and militia tradition.
c)Sunni
and Shiite Moslems fighting Americans in Iraq
, Pashtuns fighting Americans in Afghanistan .Very strong tribal, ethnic, and religious
bonds. Long historical religious and ethnic memory.Extensive family ties.
d) Irish who fought the Irish War
of Independence (1919-1921). Very strong tribal,
ethnic, and religious bonds. Long historical religious
and ethnic memory.Extensive family ties.

We
might ask, what are some of the characteristics
that make these groups effective in resisting a
foreign invader, infiltrator or occupier?First,
the fact that they have strong ethnic, racial, and
cultural ties and a long shared history is a huge
plus.After
all, one of the rules of Right Wing 101 is that
the more people have in common on these levels,
the more likely they are to work together as mutualists
and altruists; conversely the less they have in
common, the more likely they are to feed on each
other as predators or parasites.Mossad-CIA has tremendous funds to buy people
off plus an impressive assassination capability.A community needs all the cohesion and sense
of joint purpose it can muster to handle this unique
threat.Second,
viable resistance communities tend to have strongly
conservative values. This supports the self-discipline
required to avoid taking bribes and the vision required
to invest in the long term survival of ones family
and future generations.In
this regard, political leftism and pro-open homosexuality
activism are negative indicators, since these viewpoints
typically promote self-indulgent lifestyles that
disrupt normal procreation, family ties, and long
term loyalty to an ethnic community.Think
it through, and I think you will agree that achieving
full blown popular sovereignty rights implies the
right to (a) to issue your own currency (b) raise
your own military forces and decide when and where
to make war (c) control your own borders (d) put
your own people in charge of the strategic bases
of your society (e) engage in separate diplomacy
and alliances (f) run your own police and courts
so that you are the territorial monopolist on force
within your own territory (g) control adequate wealth
and other economic power to be competitive in the
world and (h) maintain core values, to include an
indigenous culture and religion that supports the
cohesion, distinctiveness,and will to survive of your society.The
process of trying to pull (a) to (h) together so
that outsiders can never again put their boots in
your face is called “nationalism.”This is what America’s internationalist
Zionist power elite has been working so furiously
behind the scenes to destroy for the average American
–while helping themselves like pigs at the
troth to further Jewish nationalist (or criminal
Zionist) objectives.“De-nationalization” is what
they have been trying to do to us when they have
erased our borders with Mexico and other Third World countries, subordinated
our foreign policy to Israel , outsourced our main industries,
attacked white heritage and ethnic consciousness,
and undermined family values. Historically,
nations tend to evolve out of fighting forces whose
members have strong racial, ethnic, cultural, or
religious similarities.Any group of people willing to risk their
lives to support each other for a higher cause are
usually, on a de facto level, at least about 60%-80%
home free towards achieving all the elements
of (a) to (h) above.This is one reason why home-grown militia
movements frighten Zionists who control much of
America
today, despite the fact that the U.S. Government
was originally born on the backs of militia. In
talking about sovereignty, we have to be careful
not to confuse symbols with substance.For example, some central American “banana
republics” have all the symbols of sovereignty
such as their own flags, postage stamps, national
anthems, official borders, distinctive currency,
and unique army uniforms,but none of the real substance. Behind the
scenes they are controlled by foreign entities such
as American fruit companies or the CIA-Mossad team.In
contrast, the Jewish people prior to the formal
announcement of the state of Israel in May 1948 were at the other
extreme.While
they certainly had “nuclear megatonnage”
of the financial component of sovereignty, most
of this was invisible to the man on the street.Most of the external symbols of sovereignty
were camouflaged and concealed, with the real substance
tucked away inside synagogues, Jewish community
centers, and bank accounts around the world.Zionism lay coiled and ready to strike,
much like Hitler’s panzers that lay
camouflaged inside the ArdennesForest prior to Battle of the Bulge. In
the late 19th century it was often said
that the Rothschilds and other elite Jewish families
in Europe were more powerful than many European governments,
even though they remained in the shadows.Of
course once the state of Israel
was declared, Zionists leaders quickly parlayed
raw Jewish financial power into all the overt manifestations
of sovereignty.The Israeli army immediately engaged in combat
operations against Arabs.The Israeli flag, Israeli postage stamps,
the Israeli national anthem, definable borders,
and other over sovereignty manifestations quickly
sprang forth.

Kevin
Alfred Strom worked closely with Dr. William Pierce
as an understudy and then later tried to lead the National
Alliance as his successor. He is extremely intelligent and
grasps the importance of using multiple approaches (both decentralized
as well as centralized) to run social and political movements.
I have been impressed enough with his work to personally create
an archive
of his articles at americafirstbooks.com. In
his younger years, Strom edited The Best of Attack!
Revolutionary Voice of the National Alliance and National
Vanguard Tabloid, a compilation of issues from 1970
to 1982. (Now in 64 MB PDF, download for free here;
you may have to right click twice in Mozilla Firefox and overlay
the first attempt).This remains an all time classic, if nothing
else demonstrating how various social issues have only grown
worse over time, and how we face a greater urgency today to
address these issues than ever before.Unfortunately
Kevin was brought down by charges made by a malevolent wife,
Elisha Strom in cooperation with the Feds. There is strong
evidence that he was framed, and had to plea-bargain under
extreme coercion to avoid onerous long term jail conditions.
Now rejoined with his family and living in Charlottesville,
VA, he seems to be bouncing back.Links:
Please visit the Kevin
Strom archive at America First Books. Also his
home page at kevin-strom.com.

Dr.
Revilo Pendleton Oliver provides a unique historical
perspective as former military intelligence director as
well as professor of classics. His commentaries on political
events from back issues of Liberty Bell magazine
remain timeless classics. He also had amazing historical
depth. Like Simpson, many of his works explain the Jewish
PSYOP aspect of Christianity.Christianity
creates a number of very serious problems from a nationalist
ideological viewpoint, apart from being discredited on a
purely rationalistic basis by Enlightenment thinkers who
included America's very own Tom Paine in his Age of
Reason. As a universalistic religion, Christianity
is inherently leftist and hence works from an "environmental"
philosophical perspective against the more "genetic"
nationalist perspective. In addition, Christianity induces
white gentiles to replace their own tribal history and allegiances
with that of an alien people --the Jews. The evil phenomenon
of "Christian Zionism," explained in the Rev
Ted Pike archive, is a clear example of Jewish hijacking
of indigenous gentile tribalism. In
the Religious
Crisis archive, I explain why I have become convinced
that it is impossible to have a truly effective nationalist
movement without the revitalization of indigenous religion.
Although white indigenous religionists will probably never
outnumber Christians in America, they can still become large
enough to play a key role in containing Christian Zionist
lunacy. The
Oliver Biographical
Note states: "Dr.
Revilo Pendleton Oliver, Professor of the Classics at the
University of Illinois for 32 years and one of the leading
philologists of his time, read eleven languages, including
Sanskrit, and for more than half a century wrote scholarly
articles in four languages for academic publications in
the United States and Europe. Oliver was also the possessor
of a penetrating intellect — and a scintillating wit
unequaled by any writer, though the great H. L. Mencken
may have come close." Some
of Dr. Oliver's books are online, such as:The
Origins of Christianity -- published posthumously:
A book-length treatise on the roots of the dominant religion
of the West. Reflections
on the Christ Myth -- Historical Review
Press, published posthumously: An important new booklet
on the genesis of the Jesus story. See
also fascinating Liberty Bell articles such as:
By
Their Fruits Ye Shall Know Them -- Dead Sea
Scrolls fraud, Christian origins and consequences, U.S.
Civil War. A
Persistent Hoax -- The myth of the Jewish "Diaspora."How
They Stole the Church -- The palace revolution
in the "modernized" Roman Catholic Church. The
Last Stand -- Was the Jesus of the "New
Testament" racially a Jew? Dr. Oliver looks into this
question and the role of the Jew in the ancient world in
this review.Links:
Revilo-Oliver.com;
older version of Oliver web site with
photos.Sample
Video:1969
Dr.
Revilo P. Oliver: After 50 Years - The National Youth Alliance
(vide) (1969) (36:27), uploaded 2011

Oliver in 1938

Oliver and wife, 1990

Dr.
David Duke is author of two important classics,
namely Jewish
Supremacism and My
Awakening. His web site, davidduke.com,
is an important source of racial nationalist information,
along with the Stormfront.org
thread run by his colleague Don Black. In
Chapter
34 of my Trilogy, I explain what I learned
from listening to Dr. Duke's talks when I attended the 2005
European American conference in New Orleans:

"...Dr.
David Duke explained how the national media has spent
untold millions to demonize both the Klan and American
Nazis. Now all they have to do is attach anything that
American conservatives say to terms like "Nazi"
or "Klan" and most Americans immediately tune
out like classically-conditioned Pavlovian dogs. Dr.
Duke explained that despite the fact that he has served
as an elected representative in the Louisiana legislature,
and has not been a Klan leader for over 30 years, every
where he goes he is always referred to as "former
Klan leader" David Duke by the controlled national
media, as if this is imprinted on his birth certificate.
Furthermore, his own Klan organization was completely
nonviolent and law-abiding.Adding
to the lies, the Jewish controlled media try to make Dr.
Duke out to be an anti-Catholic WASP, even though most
of the members of his Klan organization in Louisiana were
Catholics and he strongly encourages WASP-Catholic unity.In
his book My Awakening, Dr. Duke regrets a short
demonstration he performed while a student at LSU when
he wore a swastika armband. At the time, he believed what
the 1960's American Nazi leader George Lincoln Rockwell
said about how only Nazis seem to have the guts to come
out in the open and stand up to the Jews. He was outraged
at what certain high-level Jews were doing to subvert
America and felt that desperate measures were justified
to wake up the public. However, now he believes that Americans
need to come up many different fresh approaches that keep
people focused on facts and issues and avoid symbols where
the Jews have been able to spend millions to brainwash
people into Pavlovian reflexes. Despite the magnitude
of Zionist wealth, Duke thinks that whites can still win
local elections through old fashioned grass-roots political
campaigning...

In
my "Environmental
vs. Genetic" article, I discuss many important
sides of racial conflict that are typically overlooked by
many American racial nationalists who tend to just focus
on criminal offenses and violence. Please scroll to my section
headings "How too much `sugar' in a multiracial society
can be just as deadly as too much `vinegar,'" followed
by the sections " The `wonderful' danger, "`Uncle
Tomism' and `love-bombing,'" "`Building' America
one alien bootlick at a time," "The reign of the
`sugar-daddies,'" and the remainder of the article
through the summary. In
addition, throughout history there have been a number of
successful nationalist-flavored organized labor movements
in places like Spain, Germany, and the Scandinavia countries.
On a strategic political level, the tendency of many self-styled
American nationalists to ignore organized labor and abdicate
to leftists has not been very bright. I
am also convinced that the only real long term solution
for America's problems is for northern European peoples
to recreate homogeneous tribal ethno-states -- precisely
the kind environment they have evolved in for more than
ten thousand years. My
main issue with David Duke is the fact that he (like myself)
was born and raised in the South, which remains a de facto
multi-racial, multi-cultural society, oppressed by Yankee
conquest, and heavily infiltrated by Jewish and Federal
supremacists. David Duke identifies himself publicly as
a Christian and as a politician
running for office. I am more "indigenous"
(shall we put it?) in terms of my own personal political
and religious approach, as discussed in my author
archive and Religious
Crisis web page. From
a purely ideological perspective, I think it is much clearer
for someone to start out with a social model that reflects
an indigenous, homogeneous Nordic or Celtic society, with
its own land base and naturally-evolved tribal culture and
religion. These societies typically had a large middle class
of armed free men who practiced a native form of egalitarianism.
(An Icelandic scholar once referred to his fellow citizens
as "an aristocratic people with egalitarian tendencies").
This "indigenous folk" approach is much clearer
to me instead of trying to find conceptual anchor points
amidst the social and political mess that currently exists
throughout the South today, not to mention everywhere else
in America. It is also much clearer than trying to interpret
the traditional culture of my own ancestors through the
censorship, distortions, and warped political priorities
of Jewish-controlled
national media. The
fact that the South started out as a multi-cultural plantation
society with a negro slave underclass, and then got beat
badly in a terrible war with the United States government,
muddies a lot of waters compared to what I consider to be
an authentic Nordic or Celtic nationalist viewpoint. I prefer
to start out with a society like Old
Norse Iceland that in recent centuries was minding its
own business and not bothering anyone up until the recent
financial fiasco egged on by the Russian Jewish mafia, Rothschild-controlled
City of London, and Jewish-controlled American financial
firms like Goldman Sachs, as documented in my "Iceland
Gets `ENRONed,' Then Goes for `1776'" series.Speaking
of Dr. Duke's call for Protestant-Catholic unity, there
are some important sociological qualifications worth mentioning.
For starters, Dr. Duke is surrounded by Southern French
Catholics, who historically have been a different breed
of cat compared to certain Irish and Italian
Catholics who have been all too willing to serve as "front
men" and "muscle" for the Jews in big cities
like New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles. Two particularly
illustrious French Catholics who hardly served as flunkies
for the "establishment" were Gen.
Pierre Gustave Toutant Beauregard, victor of the First
Battle of Manassas and other major campaigns, and Admiral
Raphael Semmes, captain of the raider C.S.S. Alabama
and one of the greatest naval commanders in American history.
(According to Wikipedia, Semmes' "1869 Memoirs
of Service Afloat During The War Between the States
....was viewed as one of the most cogent, but bitter, defenses
of the Lost
Cause.")Dr.
David Duke is trying to be a pragmatist and a realist, and
deal with incrementally improving things according to the
way they are, rather than the way he would like for them
to be. In contrast, I am currently more interested in playing
the role of the intellectual rather than the politician.
I am also more interested in fundamental analysis, which
by definition starts at the roots. Each approach has it
own merits and niche, so I am certainly not condemning Dr.
Duke for his particular tactics that may be more suitable
for his particular background and talents..The
power elite is vastly more radical than myself. Worse yet,
they are radical in a extremely alien and evil way. According
to Alex Jones, the end
game of the global power elite is to kill off
over 80% of the gentile population through false flag pandemics,
nuclear wars, and other means, and then enslave the survivors
with an iron dictatorship that tracks everyone with implanted
RFID chips. They have been patiently assembling their martial
law and police state control grids for decades. They are
willing to ruthlessly confine or kill off any sectors of
the overall population that might offer any form of resistance.
They are prepared to use not only a growing network of FEMA
camps, but also foreign troops trained to kill without question.
I
agree with Alex Jones that if the New World Order elite
ever succeeds in using U.S. police and the U.S. military
to liquidate all domestic dissidents, it is very likely
that these kosher butchers will then bring in foreigners
to liquidate major elements of U.S. security forces who
cooperated with them. (They have already crippled major
portions of the American military through depleted
uranium poisoning). The Jacobin phase of the French
Revolution validated the adage: "revolutions
at times devour their own children." So did Stalin
with his 1936-1938 Great
Purge of major portions of the Bolshevik establishment
and Red Army leadership. In the final analysis, no one
in America is safe if the New World Order succeeds, except
perhaps kosher "Members of the Tribe" who manage
to stay on top --unless they too get taken down as well,
as they did in National Socialist Germany or in the latter
phases of Stalin's dictatorship. The power elite is so paranoid
and sick that they will eventually try to destroy any form
of identity or social cohesion outside their own group,
to include any American patriotic sentiment. Members of
American police, FBI, the U.S. military, and other security
forces who still hold quaint notions about taking seriously
their oath to protect and defend the Constitution (not
created by Jews!) will also be ultimately targeted for their
potential resistance to absolute tyranny. The
power elite has already handed over a large chunk of America's
strategic industries to Red China. According to Final
Judgment, Israelis jointly developed hydrogen bombs
with the Red Chinese. They have also sold America's top
secrets to Communist enemies, as in the Jonathan Pollard
case, and operate most
espionage operations against this country. They have
proven a million times over that they absolutely no loyalty
or any principles at all. Why would they hesitate to put
Chinese generals in charge of the Pentagon and millions
of Chinese soldiers in America's streets and in charge of
FEMA death camps if it might serve them a political advantage?Alex
Jones is not even a racial nationalist. However, the existence
of Jewish
Neanderthalism and other forms of ethnic-genetic distance
can plausibly explain his belief that the power elite
is cruel enough to install both Orwell's Nineteen
Eighty-Four and Huxley's Brave
New World in America. "Members of the Tribe"
have already demonstrated their unlimited capacity for mass
murder in Bolshevik Russia, and Zionist cruelty continues
unabated against Christian and Muslim Palestinians in Gaza
and the West Bank. The
outrages and abuses will only grow worse over time until
enough citizens finally organize to put an end to them.
As Alex Jones puts it, if the power elite is evil enough
to kill one million Iraqis without any evidence of WMD's
to justify the invasion of Iraq, why would they hesitate
to steal your pension, not to mention all your civil liberties?It
remains to be seen whether or not enough American will finally
wake up in time to the true nature of their real enemies.
In the long run, it takes positive tribalism to oppose evil
tribalism, hence the need for a healthy resurgence in positive
forms of white nationalism. Links:
davidduke.com,
which include articles on the question "what is nationalism?"
Sample videos:
2012-03-21 Obama:
Craven Puppet of Racist Israel
2012-02-02 The
Coverup of Zionist Organized Crime!
2012-02The
World Masters of Slavery
2011-10-26 Do
Zionists Control Wall Street? The Shocking Facts!
2011-07-30 Zionist
Terrorism in Norway
2011-05-03 The
Zionist War on Free Speech
2011-05-02 The
Insanity of Christian Zionism!

Dr. David Duke upsetting the
Z ionist plutocracy with
another popular grass
roots campaign

Other paleoconservatives
or racial nationalists:

Instaurationonline.com
This is an archive-in-progress of the magazine Instauration
published from 1975 to 2000 by Wilmot Robertson, author
of the classic work The
Dispossessed Majority. Double click on the cover
pictures to pull up PDFs for each issue. The database of
back issues is being built over time by white civil rights
activist James Kelso. Instauration provided a gold
mine of paleoconservative and "racial nationalist"
articles.

John Tyndall articles
archive at The Spearhead. Tyndall was a founder
of the British National Party. These articles span from
Aug 1999 to July 2005. I happen to agree with his prediction,
made in the early 1990's, that the 21st century will in
all likelihood wind up looking more like the 19th century
than the 20th century, especially once the evil Zionist
genie finally gets put back in its bottle, the international
crime family home base state of Israel collapses, and the
Orwellian, neo-Jacobin, multi-racial, multi-cultural, Zionist-dominated,
welfare-warfare global "New Babylon" superstate
that wages "perpetual war for perpetual peace"
(for more background on the aforementioned "jabberwocky"
terminology that has become synonymous with "the U.S.A."
please see Chapter
6 of the Mission of Conscience series) finally
breaks apart into separate countries and common citizens
rediscover "nationalism" as a vital tool for making
their societies self-sustaining and viable once again (and
the Lone Star flag flies at the top of the flag pole in
the Republic of Texas once again!). All of this may not
exactly usher in some kind of "City on the Hill"
utopian "New Age" society, but at least we might
wind up with something less bad than what we have right
now.

There are many dozens of other paleoconservative thinkers
and media leaders who are worthy of mention. Please go to
my Site
Map section to find many of them listed under
"Somewhere between libertarian, nationalist, and unbridled
revisionist free-thinker" and "Racial nationalists."

Update
References:

2013-04-17
Nationalism—the
Bane of the Modern Ageby Dr. Robert Higgs.[Ed. Note: I felt dismayed when I read this article
because I have listened to quite a few of Dr. Higg's lectures
archived at mises.org
and read his articles archived
at lewrockwell.com. While he generally has a lot of
fascinating insights, such as his revisionist
view that WWII did not pull America out of the Great Depression
(or expressed differently, America came ouf of the Depression
in a rear-end backwards fashion more despite rather
than because of official government policies),
his very negative view of nationalism stated in this article
obviously conflicts with my own positive views that I have
outlined on this web page. I think Dr. Higgs has made a
straw man out of "nationalism" by equating it
with various perverse and abusive forms of "top down"
nationalism (of course not all forms of "top down"
nationalism are perverse or abusive) characterized by extreme
statism, criminal exploitation, and militaristic imperialism
rather than considering "bottom up" forms of grass
roots nationalism that often have strong libertarian elements.
With libertarian forms of nationalism, small countries often
serve an ecological function relative to other nations comparable
to enterpreneurial companies which provide sorely needed
innovation and productive management cultures for their
broader industry groups (analogous on a broader political
level to continental groups of countries such as Europe
or South America). Countries run by "globalists"
and "internationalists" may be comparable to big
multinational corporations run by Robber Barons where making
gains through intrigue typically trumps making gains through
increased productivity on the shop floor. National borders
created by nationalists also provide "fire walls"
that help prevent globalists and other "internationalists"
from gaining too much power in their never ending drive
to monopolize all forms of economic, political, and media
power on this planet. Interestingly enough, the leading
libertarian thinker Dr. Murray Rothbard, in his Mises Institute
lectures, viewed the existence of small independent states
(implying strong local "nationalisms") as being
preferable to international alliances among empires (implying
strong "internationalist" ideological orientations).
When small countries without alliances get involved in wars,
they tend to remain localized. When larger countries that
reject localized "nationalism" in favor of multinational
economic and political arrangements get involved in wars,
there is usually a greater chance that these wars will escalate
out of control as mutual defense pact allies get sucked
in. Hence, creating vast alliances in the name of preserving
"world peace" may actually do more to make wars
bigger and more costly over the long run than what would
be the case with a more decentralized global system. I also
disagree with Dr. Higg's statement that "Americans,
perhaps more than any others, are immersed in nationalism,
drenched to the bone." In my "Introduction
to American `Nationalism'" section above
I explain why I think American nationalism has always been
something of a joke relative to varous forms of traditional
European nationalism].
2012-07-04 Anti-WASP/Anti-Nordic
Genocide. This web page is a compilation
of material previously created on other web pages by William
B. Fox, to include Oslo-Utoya
7-22. 2012-06-23How
Racial
Realities in Europe and Theories of Entrepreneurial
Business Competition Provide Important Perspectives to Help
Diagnose "What Is Ailing America".
This is an extended essay added to his
Articles Archive web page by William B. Fox.

READ THE BOOK
A Jewish doctor urges Christians, Jews and everyone else
to read The Protocols of Zion, because he believes
it documents an evil Rothschild conspiracy against everyone—
including Jews. Dr. Leonard George Horowitz, who warns
against vaccinations and other medical scams, and believes
9-11 and AIDS are government conspiracies etc., was a
guest of George Noory on his Coast to Coast AM
radio program. With more than 15 million faithful listeners
it is the most-listened-to late-night radio program in
North America, broadcast on over 500 U.S. stations plus
XM Satellite Radio, as well as numerous Canadian affiliates,
Mexico, Guam etc.

Please
see my discussion of the "Protocols" in Chapter
34 of the Mission of Conscience series, where
I provide article links and extracts from Michael Collins
Piper, Brother Nathanael Kapner, and other authors.
2010-07-15 What
Would It Take? by Edmund Connelly, Occidental
Observer, "I believe Whites are willfully denying
the clear and present danger we face. Whether it is through
late or broken marriages, lackluster efforts at having replacement-level
families, or feeble efforts at keeping the governing elite
from importing a new (non-White) people, demographically,
White Americans are in free fall. About this, the numbers
speak clearly; there is no ambiguity . . . Everything in
this article written thus far describes the non-violent
dispossession of Whites, but there remains the possibility
of the process speeding up through mass slaughter. MacDonald
is explicit in comparing the heavily Jewish Bolshevik takeover
of Russia to the situation here today: “Again, the
analogy is striking. As emphasized
repeatedly on TOO, Whites
can expect to be increasingly victimized by non-Whites with
historical grudges as they sink to minority status and lose
political power.”
2010-06-20 The
Death of the WASP by Paul Gottfried, Taki's
Magazine.
2010-06-11 Is
Israel Doomed? by Chris Bollyn
2010-05 Elena
Kagan and the Decline of WASP America by Kevin
MacDonald, Ph. D, The Nationalist Times, May 2010
2010-04-10 Zionism
Unmasked: The Dark Face Of Jewish Nationalismby Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies
at the U.S. Army War College. See also interesting commentary
by Dr. Sabrosky in "Israel
Did 9-11" - U.S. Military Expert Supports Bollyn Thesis."
2009-01-23 UN
Agenda 21 For Dummies (Video). Watch this along
with Alex Jones' Endgame:
Blueprint for Global Enslavement. To the extent
that all of this is true (I leave it to the reader to conduct
his or her own research), it is hard to escape the strong
suspicion that people like Jacob Rothschild, David
Rockefeller, Jr., Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew
Brzezinski, Bill Gates, the late Herman
Kahn, and even Ted Turner (also a "Bilderberger")
and other multi-billionaire elitists or high level think
tank satraps who help "rule the world" are not
afflicted with various forms of spoiled rich brat neuroses
and even criminal insanity. Many of them are hostile aliens
utterly consumed by their own greed for power and engaged
in perpetual covert racial and ethnic warfare with the rest
of humanity.UN
Agenda 21 is just one more incredibly bizarre and socially
destructive social plan promoted mainly by Jewish plutocrats
along with hordes of brainwashed and equally psychopathic
gentile fellow travelers. This is just one more example
of an endless list of destructive ideologies for gentiles,
such as Bolshevism, extreme feminism, militant homosexuality
... what will they think up next? I am convinced that Jews
as a group contain some kind of nihilistic tropism that
is ultimately genetic in nature towards parasitically disorienting
gentile host populations. This is the exact opposite of
the humanistic assumption behind libertarianism that humans
have a fundamental urge towards rationality, productive
enterprise, and respect for personal liberty and property
rights. Hence, sociobiological parasitism theory trumps
libertarian rationalist political arguments -- or at least
when it comes to Jews. Please see my additional discussion
of Aztec, Thug, and Jewish anomalies in the "parasitism"
section of my mutualism
vs. parasitism articleOne
of the ironies of evangelical Christianity and anarcho-libertarian
political ideology is that it encourages WASPs to ignore
the alien racial traits of Jews and other exotic peoples
and even shill for them, forever hoping patiently that they
will eventually become "just like us" if only
"we set the example." Of course, this never happens.
In fact, once alien peoples reach a certain critical mass
in power and influence, they no longer engage in adaptive
mimicry towards the former WASP majority, but instead their
alien traits come to the surface, often with horrifying
consequences. "Agenda 21" is a perfect example
of an incredibly bizarre and "un-American" program
being promoted by wealthy people who have lived in America
most of their lives --or who have certainly been exposed
to traditional American values created by WASPs even if
they have lived elsewhere -- yet obviously nothing has "sunk
in." Instead, these perpetual aliens preach forms of
technological regression, genocidal collectivism, and other
ideological oddities that would be hilarious as "black
comedy" if they weren't being promoted so seriously
by so many "official sources." Indeed, as mentioned
before on this web page, WASPs have "trained the dog(s)
to bite them."
1960-10 Zoological
Subspecies in Man, by Dr. Raymond Hall. Mankind
Quarterly. Far from comprising some kind of "aberration"
practiced only by homo sapiens, such things as
war, tribalism, and racism reflect a "dominant evolutionary
strategy" that is widely practiced in various forms
across virtually all mammalian species in nature, to include
moose, mice, and monkeys. I
have strong pro-humanitarian instincts and am not out to
sadistically promote racial, ethnic, or class warfare or
otherwise foment unnecessary human suffering in this world,
but then again, I do not think that leftist, utopian visions
of "one world government" and globalist "brotherhood
of man" are particularly realistic either.