A blog consisting of interviews, research and opinions on baseball's past, present, and future.

Top 100 Baseball Blog

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Mike Trout Is The 2012 AL MVP Any Way You Look At It

WAR, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing; at least within the
confines of this article. While they aren't the end-all, be-all, I am a major
proponent of advanced baseball stats because I believe they greatly enhance the
understanding of many components of the game. Not everyone agrees, and
traditionalists prefer more time-honored metrics like batting average, home
runs, and RBIs in lieu of WAR, UZR, and other acronymic gauges. The 2012
American League MVP, which has already become the most hotly debated baseball
topic in recent memory, is hurtling the two sides of the baseball stat spectrum
to their Antietam and promises to last well after the final vote is announced
tomorrow.

Los Angles Angels’ outfielder Mike Trout is my MVP pick over Detroit
Tigers’ third baseman Miguel Cabrera, who won the Triple Crown in 2012. Trout’s
remarkable production as a hitter and defender gave him overwhelming stats
(advanced and otherwise), solidifying his status as the most valuable player in
the AL to stat heads like myself. I have argued with many Cabrera supporters,
and no matter how many times I boxed them about the ears with my statistical artillery,
I am fairly certain I failed to change even one mind- a blow to my ego and to
common sense. With that in mind, I decided the best strategy is that if you
can’t beat them, join them. Using only standard baseball stats and refuting
popular narrative, I will show that even by traditional standards, Mike Trout should
be your 2012 AL MVP.

Myth 1: Cabrera should be MVP because
he won the Triple Crown: Winning baseball’s Triple Crown is a rare feat,
having been accomplished just 13 times prior to Cabrera’s monster season. But
the rarity of the feat is not synonymous with the MVP award. Ted Williams’ two
Triple Crowns resulted in two second place MVP finishes. The same fate befell
Chuck Klein in 1933. Poor Lou Gehrig only finished fifth in the MVP race when
he had his Triple Crown in 1934. In fact, only six of the 10 players with
Triple Crowns during seasons with an MVP award actually took home the hardware;
hardly the sure thing Cabrera supporters make it out to be.

For those who believe Cabrera deserves the MVP because of the rarity of
his achievement, consider that Trout was the FIRST player in major league
history to have 30 home runs, 45 stolen bases, and 125 runs scored in the same
season. Those are not unimportant numbers. They are the mainstream, old-time
baseball stats embraced by so many Cabrera supporters. By the logic of
scarcity, if Trout’s achievement had never been done before, isn't that even
more deserving of MVP than the relatively common Triple Crown (14 times)?

Myth 2: The Tigers made the
playoffs and the Angels didn't thus giving the edge to Cabrera: The
Tigers may have played in October while the Angels were busy on the back nine,
but it’s also not that simple. The Tigers won the AL Central, but their 88 victories
came in a weaker division and were one less than the Angels’ total of 89.
Detroit feasted on the lowly Royals, Indians and Twins, who posted three of the
five worst team ERAs in the American League. Their record against these teams
was 31-23- a full one third of all their games! By comparison, every team in
the AL West had an ERA in the top half of the league.

The Tigers’ record would have been good enough for just fourth place in
the AL West, but the Angels’ win total would have won them the Central Division.
For those believing that a player’s impact on their team’s won/loss record should
help determine the MVP, consider that the Angels were 81-58 with Trout playing,
while the Tigers were 87-74 with Cabrera; an approximate 6 games difference in
the standings over a full season.

Myth 3: Cabrera single-handedly
dragged the Tigers into the playoffs: You can’t take anything away from
Cabrera when it comes to his performance down the stretch, as in 57 games after
August 1st he hit .361 with 19 home runs and 54 RBIs. However, it is
pure myth that he was the sole hero of the Tigers post-season bid. Big Prince
Fielder practically matched Cabrera’s production over the same two-plus months
of the season, hitting .337 with 14 home runs. Gritty Andy Dirks hit .317.

The most valuable Detroit player(s) from August 1st may not have even
been a hitter. Justin Verlander was 6-1 with a 2.67 ERA, while Max Scherzer was
also 6-1 with a 2.08 ERA. In games started by other pitchers during that span
the Tigers were a mediocre 22-22.

The Tigers also benefited greatly from their final 13 games of the
season, which came against the Twins, Royals, and Indians; three of the four
worst teams in the American League. None of this is meant to discredit Cabrera,
but rather is proof that casting him in the role of a savior is more window
dressing for his MVP candidacy than actual reality.

Myth 4: Trout slumped down the
stretch, which should preclude him from winning: Baseball
is a game of streaks, both hot and cold, but the ability to bounce back
determines a player’s value. Trout hitting .257 for the month of September has
been cited as a slump that carried him out of MVP consideration, but such an
assertion is shortsighted. Despite his lower batting average, the Angels tore
through their September schedule, going 18-9. Trout played in all 27 September games,
hitting five home runs, walking 20 times, scoring 21 runs and stealing six
bases. 95% of major league players would kill to endure such a “slump.” Clearly
Trout’s September production didn't derail the Angels, and he actually helped
them to their best record for any month. It also can’t hurt to mention that 19
of those September games came against the A’s, Rangers, Tigers, and White Sox;
all contending teams fighting to get into the playoffs.

Myth 5: Defense is too hard to
measure to count… Third base is a much harder position to play than outfield…
The award for good defenders is the Gold Glove… Defense has nothing to do with
who should be MVP: The easiest way to address the question of defense
being appropriate criteria is by going straight to the guidelines given to the
voters. They state- “The rules of the voting remain the same as they were
written on the first ballot in 1931: (1) actual value of a player to his team,that is, strength of offense and defense; (2) number of games played; (3)
general character, disposition, loyalty and effort; (4) former winners are eligible;
and (5) members of the committee may vote for more than one member of a team.”

I won’t violate the terms of this article that I set disallowing the use of
advanced stats, but I challenge anyone to say with a straight face that Cabrera
is anywhere near the quality of a defensive player as Trout. Cabrera surprised
many by being somewhat adequate when he was moved to the hot corner this season, but
Trout was truly electric, patrolling the outfield like a hyperactive Frisbee
dog. His defensive value must be part of the MVP discussion.

Even if you don’t understand or value advanced baseball stats, it’s hard
to contest that many of the most common arguments being made in favor of
Cabrera’s MVP candidacy don’t hold much water when explored in more depth. In
baseball, if an elaborate narrative is needed to bear out what the numbers
don’t, it may be a good idea to reevaluate your position. Miguel Cabrera had a
terrific season; one for the ages, but he is not the 2012 American League MVP.
The logical choice is Mike Trout, by Sabermetric or traditional standards, or any
other way you may choose to look at it.