People sometimes ask, ``Why did the FSF develop a new free kernel
instead of using Linux?'' It's a reasonable question. The answer,
briefly, is that that is not the question we faced.

When we started developing the Hurd in 1990, the question facing us
was, ``How can we get a free kernel for the GNU system?'' There was
no free Unix-like kernel then, and we knew of no other plan to write
one. The only way we could expect to have a free kernel was to write
it ourselves. So we started.

We heard about Linux after its release. At that time, the question
facing us was, ``Should we cancel the Hurd project and use Linux
instead?''

We heard that Linux was not at all portable (this may not be true
today, but that's what we heard then). And we heard that Linux was
architecturally on a par with the Unix kernel; our work was leading to
something much more powerful.

Given the years of work we had already put into the Hurd, we decided
to finish it rather than throw them away.

If we did face the question that people ask---if Linux were already
available, and we were considering whether to start writing another
kernel---we would not do it. Instead we would choose another project,
something to do a job that no existing free software can do.

But we did start the Hurd, back then, and now we have made it work.
We hope its superior architecture will make free operating systems
more powerful.