Hrm, the cluster change to Cube changes the problem quite radically. Robert Gerbicz's very commanding lead isn't distinguishable anymore against much slower codes. It is really not desirable. I will write to an admin and/or the problem setter about it.

Another strange thing: it seems my AC submissions were rejudged but not the TLE submissions, and I don't know of any way for a problem setter to specify that kind of mass rejudge.

(There is some possibility that there would have eventually been a similar issue anyway if Pike and/or Haskell were upgraded to newer versions, as many have requested on the forum.)

@Sartaj: The point value here is calculated as your score divided by top score. You have gotten a small fraction of a point, not enough to increase your overall score to the next 0.1 increment. (I believe rounding occurs at the end, so if you have 0.049 points overall then it will register as 0 points, but if you make a 0.002 improvement in any problem then your total of 0.051 points will register as 0.1.)

Its given that the points awarded will be RELATIVE to the top score. What does this exactly mean?
My score is 4K n the best score is 890K, n i have got no points. What should be the least score to get points?