All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article Open Access

The Association Study of PRKG1 Gene Polymorphism and Salt-Sensitive Hypertension among the Essential Hypertension in Beijing

Abstract

Background: PRKG1 plays an important role in regulating vascular smooth muscle contraction. And this gene is regarded as one of the candidate genes on salt-sensitive hypertension. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of environmental risk factors and two SNPs and haplotypes structures of PRKG1 gene with blood salt-sensitive patients among essential hypertension.

Method: Three hundred and forty-two essential hypertensive were recruited in a case-case study, a modified Sullivan’s acute salt load method was conducted to identify the salt-sensitivity and salt-resistant. Medical history and lifestyle risk factors were obtained by questionnaire, and blood and urine specimens were collected to test the biochemical indicators. We used the Sequenom Mass ARRAY Platform for genotyping of PRKG1 gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs7897633/SNP1, rs1904694/SNP2). We applied statistical software SPSS17.0, multifactor dimensionality reduction method 1.1.0 and haploview 4.0 to do the analyses.

Conclusion: Age and 24-hour urinary sodium concentration are the environmental risk factors associated with salt-sensitive hypertension. Genotypes of SNP1-AA, SNP2-GG and haplotype AG of PRKG1 gene were risk factors for salt-sensitivity in essential hypertension.

Keywords

Introduction

Essential hypertension is one of the most common cardiovascular diseases that are seriously harmful to human health, and it is influenced by genetic and environmental factors [1]. High salt intake is the most important environmental risk factor. Salt-sensitive hypertension can be regarded as a subtype of essential hypertension; however, it is very heterogeneous among individuals. In China, a research study suggested that there is nearly sixty percent of essential hypertensive with saltsensitivity, while the general population is at twenty-five percent [2]. The characteristic of salt-sensitive hypertension significantly increases blood pressure after a salt loading test or decreases after a urinary sodium excretion test. This means that salt load is positively related with elevation of blood pressure [3]. Thus, it is possible to decrease the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality relatively by reducing dietary salt intake. In recent years, genetic biomarkers of salt-sensitivity have been taken notice by many researchers. Some studies indicate that many pathogenic mechanisms may cause salt-sensitive hypertension, such as the sympathetic nervous system, the Renin-Angiotensin- Aldosterone System (RAAS) and endothelial functional dysregulation [4,5]. In these pathways, researchers have already found some Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) loci, which are associated with saltsensitivity in the candidate genes studies [6-10]. Several researches show that PRKG1 protein (cGMP-dependent protein kinase 1) can regulate vascular smooth muscle contraction by reducing the biological activity of nitric oxide or relatively increasing intracellular Ca2+ concentration [11,12] to increase blood pressure. Further study suggests that a SNP locates in the first introns of PRKG1 gene (rs7897633) is associated with variation in diastolic blood pressure after acute salt load [13]. In this study we discuss the association between PRKG1 gene single nucleotide polymorphism (rs7897633, rs1904694) and salt-sensitive hypertension among essential hypertensive in Beijing, and investigating the interaction of the two SNPs as well as the effect of haplotypes on salt-sensitive hypertension.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Three hundred and forty-two essential hypertensive were recruited in a case-case study in Beijing, a modified Sullivan’s acute salt load method [14] was conducted to identify the Salt-Sensitive Hypertension (SSH) and Salt-Resistant Hypertension (SRH) Subjects who had one of these criteria would be involved in the study: 1) No taking of antihypertensive drugs with Blood Pressure (BP) measurement three times in different days, systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg or taking antihypertensive drugs; 2) Have a history of hypertension and use antihypertensive drugs currently, with BP is lower than 140/90 mmHg; 3) Diagnosed with essential hypertension by hospitals of level two or above. We excluded from this study, subjects with cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and secondary hypertension.

The study was approved by Ethical Committee, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. All participants were given informed consent before participating.

Measurement of anthropometric parameters

The questionnaire covered general condition, family history, physical examination, personal behavior, and medical history. Body weight, height, waist circumference, hip circumference, baseline systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were measured by well-trained community doctors. Each measurement was performed three times and the average value was calculated as a final reading. Then we calculated mean arterial pressure (MAP) by SBP and DBP value (MAP=(SBP+2*DBP)/3). Peripheral venous blood was collected in the morning after an overnight fasting for the blood biochemical examination, such as blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, etc. At the same time, food frequency tables and twentyfour hours urinary sodium excretion were used to evaluate the daily sodium intake of individuals. A modified Sullivan’s acute salt load method was conducted to identify the salt-sensitivity and salt-resistant. Blood pressure was measured by mercury sphygmomanometer on the right arm of the participant in a comfortable sitting position after at least a 5 minutes rest. Blood pressure and time-point urinary electrolyte concentration were measured after acute salt load and furosemide natriuretic test for two hours. Anticoagulant blood samples were centrifuged, and then stored at -80°C instantly.

5. Using the resin for desalination and purification after the reaction products were diluted for three times

6. After desalting, the samples were added on the target, until natural crystals formed. Afterwards, mass spectrometry and data was collected.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For continuous variables with normal distributions, we used two independent sample t-test and ANOVA to detect the environmental factors between SSH and SRH groups and the difference of distribution between the different genotypes, respectively. For variables with non-normal distributions, we applied the Rank Sum Test. Each polymorphism was evaluated for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium by χ2 test. P ≥ 0.05 was considered to obey the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The distributions of allelic and genotypic frequencies were analyzed by χ2 test. The single locus association between a polymorphism and salt-sensitive hypertension was analyzed by multiple logistic regression analysis. The interactions were associated with salt sensitivity between the tag-SNPs were analyzed by multifactor dimensionality reduction method (MDR) (version 1.1.0; Computational Genetics Laboratory, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH; www.epistasis.org). The frequencies of the haplotypes and association analysis were completed by Haploview software (version 4.0; Mark Daly’s Laboratory, Broad Institute; https:// sourceforge.net/projects/haploview/). All probability values were for two-tailed tests and P<0.05 was considered to be significant statistically.

Results

Environmental factors analysis for salt-sensitive hypertension

The characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1. There were 63 salt sensitivity subjects in 342 essential hypertensive, accounting for 18.4% of the total. There were 19.7% and 15.3% SSH in female and male, respectively, no statistically significant difference was detected. The average age of all the participants was 57.61 ± 8.50 years old, and the average age of SSH group was significant higher than SRH group (59.62 ± 8.95 vs. 57.16 ± 8.35 years old, P=0.038). The proportion of SSH increased progressively with age (11.9%, 18.0%, 20.1% and 30.4% in 40-, 50-, 60- and 70- years old). Twenty-four hours urinary sodium concentration was the risk factor associated with salt sensitivity, while there were no significant differences between the two groups in height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, BMI level, gender, smoking and drinking status, family history of hypertension, baseline blood pressure, biochemical indicators and twenty-four hours urinary potassium concentration (Table 1).

Different genotypes of PRKG1 gene and blood pressure variation analysis

We used ANOVA to detect the difference of blood pressure variation between the different genotypes after salt load and furosemide natriuretic test for two hours. The results were show ΔMABP1 when compared to those with the AA genotype between two groups after salt load for two hours of SNP1. Moreover, the subjects who carried CA or AA genotype changed bigger at ΔMABP2 than those with the CC genotype between two groups after furosemide natriuretic test for two hours of SNP1. No significant differences were found in mean arterial pressure between different genotypes.

We also observed that AA genotype carriers had a big change at ΔMABP1 after salt load for two hours of SNP2 in SS group. The subjects who carried GG or GA genotype changed bigger at ΔMABP2 when compared with the AA genotype carriers between two groups after furosemide natriuretic test for two hours of SNP2. No significant differences were found in mean arterial pressure between different genotypes.

Association between genotypic and allelic frequencies distributions with salt-sensitive hypertension

Analysis showed that the distributions of genotypic frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at the two tag-SNPs (SNP1: SSH group PHWE=0.866, SRH group PHWE=0.973, SNP2:SSH group PHWE=0.701, SRH group PHWE=0.477), suggesting that the genotypes samples of this study could be inherited stably. Table 2 showed the distribution of genotypes and alleles frequencies of SNP1 and SNP2 on essential hypertension, and there were statistically significant differences between the two tag-SNPs in the SS and SR groups (SNP1: P=0.041, SNP2: P=0.007). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to discuss the associations between SNP1 and SNP2 with salt-sensitive hypertension, respectively. The analysis (age, twenty-four hours urinary sodium concentration and the two tag-SNPs adjusted) identified that participants with the SNP1-AA genotype were 2.83-fold (95% CI: 1.21- 6.63) at risk when compared to those with the SNP1-CC genotype, and those with the SNP2-GG genotype were 3.50-fold (95% CI: 1.54- 7.93) at risk when compared to those with the SNP2-AA genotype for salt-sensitive hypertension. Meanwhile, Chi-square analysis results revealed that participants with the SNP1-A allele were 1.66-fold (95% CI: 1.12-2.47) at risk for salt-sensitive hypertension when compared to those with the SNP1-G allele. And SNP2-G allele were 1.81-fold (95% CI: 1.22-2.69) at risk for salt-sensitive hypertension when compared to those with SNP2-A allele.

MDR analysis was used to detect the interaction between each of the two tag-SNPs (SNP1 and SNP2) and twenty-four hours urinary sodium content. Table 3 summarized the best interaction models. In one-factor model, SNP1 was the best attribute for predicting saltsensitive hypertension (testing accuracy=52.21%; CVC=6/10, P=0.377). Twenty-four hours urinary sodium content and SNP1 was the best two-factor model (testing accuracy=61.51%, CVC=10/10, P=0.055). But by following the best model selected principle, the best model was determined to be a gene-environmental model, which included the polymorphisms of SNP1, SNP2 and twenty-four hours urinary sodium content, with a better testing balance accuracy to 60.67% and a perfect Cross-Validation Consistency of 10/10 (P=0.011). Thus, the interaction dendrogram (Figures 1 and 2) showed that there was no significant difference between the two tag-SNPs linked by blue lines. Furthermore, the dendrogram also indicated that there were moderate strength interactions between the two tag-SNPs with twenty-four hours urinary sodium content associated with salt-sensitivity.

Haploview 4.0 software was applied to analyze the frequency of haplotype, and there was a strong linkage disequilibrium between the two SNPs (D’=0.838, P<10-4). As it was showed in Table 4, four possible haplotypes were derived from the observed genotypes. Three haplotypes with frequencies above 5% were Haplotype1 (H1)-CA (46.9%), Haplotype 2 (H2)-AG (34.8%) and Haplotype3 (H3)-AA (15.2%). The results revealed that there were significant frequency differences between SS and SR groups in H1 (SNP1-C/SNP2-A) and H2 (SNP1-A/SNP2-G). H1 was more common in the SR group (49.47%) compared to the SS (35.81%, P=0.006), while H2 was common in the SS (46.13%) compared to the SR (32.26%, P=0.004). H1 had 0.56-fold (95%CI: 0.38-0.84) decreased risk for salt-sensitive hypertension; whereas, H2 had 1.78-fold (95%CI: 1.20-2.65) increased risk for saltsensitive hypertension.

Discussion

In the present study, we firstly performed an association study between PRKG1 gene polymorphism and salt-sensitive hypertension in Chinese. Our result suggested that age and twenty-four hours urinary sodium concentration were the main risk environmental factors associated with salt-sensitive hypertension. Subjects carrying rs7897633-AA, rs1904694-GG genotype and haplotype AG of PRKG1 gene had elevatory risks to be salt-sensitive hypertension, and there were moderate strength interactions between the two SNPs and 24- hour urinary sodium concentration associated with salt-sensitivity.

Epidemiology, clinical and experimental researches have showed that dietary sodium and renal sodium are associated with blood pressure. However, the mechanism of salt-sensitive hypertension has not been clear so far. About 50% of essential hypertension patients exists individual heterogeneity of salt-sensitive [15]. Several studies have reported that salt-sensitive hypertension may be related with gender [16], race [17], family history of hypertension [18-20], metabolic syndrome [21] and genetic factors [22]. A dietary interaction study revealed that BP responses to low-sodium and high-sodium interactions were both significantly greater in women compared to men for SBP and DBP [16]. A GenSalt study conducted in rural north China indicated that salt-sensitivity was more common in individuals who were older and had higher basic blood pressure [23]. Similarly, significant differences had been found on changes of SBP between different age groups at low and high sodium feeding periods compared to baseline period, and there were trends of the extent of DBP and MAP increasing with the age at the two periods in the proband who had untreated high normal BP or stage-1 hypertension from 68 families [24]. Our results found there was an association between age and salt-sensitivity, with the increasing of age, the frequencies of SSH significantly increased, which was similar to previous reports.

Many researchers suggested that salt-sensitive hypertension was related to the disordered mechanism of sodium ion and calcium ion transport and the impaired endothelial function [25,26]. After salt load test the inhibition of PRKG1 isoenzyme reduces the biological activity of nitric oxide, regulating contractility of the vascular smooth muscle cells. Perhaps it may increase intracellular free calcium ions concentration or increase sensitivity to calcium ion of the contractile cells in response to elevate blood pressure. In brief, calcium ion plays an important role in controlling vascular tone, so it makes a significant contribution to regulation of systemic blood pressure [11,27]. It is the character of salt-sensitive hypertension that impaired vasodilatation, which is mediated by nitric oxide appears before hypertension. With the increasing of age and blood pressure, the damage will be aggravated further [26]. Thus, PRKG1 gene is regarded as one of the candidate genes on salt-sensitive hypertension.

PRKG1 gene on human chromosome 10 encodes the soluble cGMPdependent protein kinase type Ια & Ιβ, a nitro-vasodilator effector, which widely distributes in human cells. PRKG1 isoforms Ια and Ιβ act as key mediators of the nitric oxide/cGMP signalling pathway and are important components of many signal transduction processes in diverse cell types. The PRKG1 proteins play a central role in regulating cardiovascular and neuronal functions in addition to relaxing smooth muscle tone [28,29], preventing platelet aggregation, and modulating cell growth. This gene is most strongly expressed in all types of smooth muscle, platelets, cerebellar Purkinje cells, hippocampal neurons, and the lateral amygdale [30]. Isoforms Ια and Ιβ have identical cGMPbinding and catalytic domains, but differ in their leucine or isoleucine zipper and auto inhibitory sequences, and therefore differ in their dimerization substrates and kinase enzyme activity.

The pathogenic mechanism of PRKG1 gene on salt sensitive hypertension is not clarified. In 2011, Citterio et al. [13] conducted a Genome Wide Association Study which found a strong association with variation in diastolic blood pressure after acute salt loading for a cluster of tag-SNPs mapping in the first introns of PRKG1 gene (rs7897633) in Italians. However, it was not demonstrated that whether PRGK1 exists interactions in gene-gene and gene-environment. Yet, we found that there was no significant interaction between the two tag-SNPs and there was moderate strength interaction between the two tag-SNPs with twenty-four hours urinary sodium content related to salt-sensitivity. Studies suggest that a high conservation of the SNP1-A alleles within a moderately conserved flanking intronic region, meaning the ancestral nature of this nucleotide [13]. The SNP1-A allele is a risk gene for saltsensitive response to salt intake, whereas the SNP1-C allele has no significant influence on blood pressure after salt load. In addition, in Hap Map populations the SNP1-A allele is present at high frequency in Sub-Saharan Africans and Kenyans, and at very low frequency in Africans and Chinese who lives in Metropolitan Denver. Meanwhile the SNP2-G allele is present at high frequency in Kenyans and at very low frequency in Chinese who lives in Metropolitan Denver. This study indicated that there were no significant differences at mean arterial pressure variation between different genotypes of SNP1 and SNP2 after acute salt load or furosemide natriuretic test for two hours. Haplotype analysis showed that the frequencies of H1 and H2 were higher than other haplotypes in the crowd. Haplotype1 which consists of protection alleles of the two tag-SNPs shares the highest frequency in the salt-resistance group. Conversely, Haplotype 2 which includes risk alleles of the two tag-SNPs shares the highest frequency in the saltsensitivity group. Another study indicates that PRKG1 impinges on circadian rhythms, influencing a mass of physiological processes such as cardiovascular activity [31] .

Currently salt sensitivity determination method is mainly either acute or chronic salt load test, but there still remain a lot of limitations. Chronic salt load test is more appropriate to people’s eating habits, and is more closed to effect on blood pressure for a long-term salt load in our real life. However, the test period is usually much longer, and cannot avoid the influence of ordinary diet to the consequences during the test. There were more missing participants because they were unable to tolerate the changes in tastes. Therefore, this method is not appropriate for the cohort study. While it does not take a long time for acute salt load test, only a few hours, and it is convenient for quality control [31,32]. In our study, participants received acute salt load test, and it was dangerous to the elderly people. So they needed to be monitored closely. At present, salt sensitivity determination methods are too complicated and troublesome to be appropriate for screening in mass. It is urgently need to find an easier and more acceptable method for salt sensitivity determination in the future.

Conclusion

Age and twenty-four hour urinary sodium concentration were the environmental risk factors associated with salt-sensitive hypertension. Genotypes of SNP1-AA, SNP2-GG and haplotype AG of PRKG1 gene were risk factors for salt-sensitivity in essential hypertension. There was moderate strength interaction between the two tag-SNPs with twenty-four hours urinary sodium content related with salt-sensitivity.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the grants from Natural Science Foundation of China (81373076), Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (SQKM201210025010), and Funding Project for Academic Human Resources Development in Institutions of Higher Learning under the Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality (PXM2011-014226-07-000028), Beijing Municipal Commission of Education for Overseas Students (2011-No165).