Tabletop:dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

Right. So billions in sanctions, theft of data, hacking of voting systems, poisonings of Russian expats in London with military grade nerve agents = mutual propaganda? You seem ignorant of the present, let alone history.

Tabletop:dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

Tchernobog:Tabletop: dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

derpes_simplex:Tabletop: dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

Right. So billions in sanctions, theft of data, hacking of voting systems, poisonings of Russian expats in London with military grade nerve agents = mutual propaganda? You seem ignorant of the present, let alone history.

So now a killing in London falls under the heading of "election interference?" Forget the present and future, you can't even follow the conversation.

derpes_simplex:Tabletop: dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

Right. So billions in sanctions, theft of data, hacking of voting systems, poisonings of Russian expats in London with military grade nerve agents = mutual propaganda? You seem ignorant of the present, let alone history.

Putin doesn't pay his people to be intelligent, he pays them to be disruptive.

derpes_simplex:Tchernobog: Tabletop: dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

Tabletop:derpes_simplex: Tabletop: dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

Right. So billions in sanctions, theft of data, hacking of voting systems, poisonings of Russian expats in London with military grade nerve agents = mutual propaganda? You seem ignorant of the present, let alone history.

So now a killing in London falls under the heading of "election interference?" Forget the present and future, you can't even follow the conversation.

The topic of debate was whether or not the cold war was back on. Please try to keep up.

Latinwolf:dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

The irony is that I got this guy favored as "Gun Nut", and of all of the gun advocates on Fark there's only three people who are so out that that I labeled them as such.

Tabletop:derpes_simplex: Tabletop: dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

Right. So billions in sanctions, theft of data, hacking of voting systems, poisonings of Russian expats in London with military grade nerve agents = mutual propaganda? You seem ignorant of the present, let alone history.

So now a killing in London falls under the heading of "election interference?" Forget the present and future, you can't even follow the conversation.

No, assasinations in GB don't fall under election interference, but it does fall under Cold War tactics.

You did just see our President insult our closest allies, and then prostrate himself to Putin, right? You ok with that?

derpes_simplex:Tabletop: derpes_simplex: Tabletop: dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

Right. So billions in sanctions, theft of data, hacking of voting systems, poisonings of Russian expats in London with military grade nerve agents = mutual propaganda? You seem ignorant of the present, let alone history.

So now a killing in London falls under the heading of "election interference?" Forget the present and future, you can't even follow the conversation.

The topic of debate was whether or not the cold war was back on. Please try to keep up.

[78.media.tumblr.com image 500x281]

And in that debate I equated the Russian "interference" in our election with propaganda. Because that's what their interference amounts to. I did not equate every nefarious thing russia is accused of doing with propaganda.

dinch:Tabletop: derpes_simplex: Tabletop: dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

Right. So billions in sanctions, theft of data, hacking of voting systems, poisonings of Russian expats in London with military grade nerve agents = mutual propaganda? You seem ignorant of the present, let alone history.

So now a killing in London falls under the heading of "election interference?" Forget the present and future, you can't even follow the conversation.

No, assasinations in GB don't fall under election interference, but it does fall under Cold War tactics.

You did just see our President insult our closest allies, and then prostrate himself to Putin, right? You ok with that?

I could be outraged by it, it would still be the exact opposite of the cold war.

Tabletop:dinch: Tabletop: derpes_simplex: Tabletop: dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

Right. So billions in sanctions, theft of data, hacking of voting systems, poisonings of Russian expats in London with military grade nerve agents = mutual propaganda? You seem ignorant of the present, let alone history.

So now a killing in London falls under the heading of "election interference?" Forget the present and future, you can't even follow the conversation.

No, assasinations in GB don't fall under election interference, but it does fall under Cold War tactics.

You did just see our President insult our closest allies, and then prostrate himself to Putin, right? You ok with that?

I could be outraged by it, it would still be the exact opposite of the cold war.

Yes, there was the possibility of mutual destruction, but that's not what the Cold War was about.

dinch:Tabletop: dinch: Tabletop: derpes_simplex: Tabletop: dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

Ahm... you are aware of the difference between engaging in mutual propaganda and engaging in mutually assured destruction, right?

The cold war is not back on, and I'm not the buddy of anyone ignorant enough about history to say so.

Right. So billions in sanctions, theft of data, hacking of voting systems, poisonings of Russian expats in London with military grade nerve agents = mutual propaganda? You seem ignorant of the present, let alone history.

So now a killing in London falls under the heading of "election interference?" Forget the present and future, you can't even follow the conversation.

No, assasinations in GB don't fall under election interference, but it does fall under Cold War tactics.

You did just see our President insult our closest allies, and then prostrate himself to Putin, right? You ok with that?

I could be outraged by it, it would still be the exact opposite of the cold war.

Yes, there was the possibility of mutual destruction, but that's not what the Cold War was about.

alienated:Latinwolf: dinch: Tabletop: Good. Throw all the hawks out of leadership positions. If you're 18-22 you can be a hawk and not an idiot. This guy has no excuse. The cold war is over buddy, time to hit the bricks.

Ahm... you are aware of the election interference that Russia has been doing, right?

The Cold War is back on, buddy

The irony is that I got this guy favored as "Gun Nut", and of all of the gun advocates on Fark there's only three people who are so out that that I labeled them as such.

a gun nut being pro russia ? the HELL you say ....

Think about it, there are plenty of gun advocates on Fark, dozens of them yet only 3 are so bad that they get the "gun nut" label. In comparison, not even our resident ham radio operator aka "2nd amendment solutions from the roof top" guy has this label.