When comparing Substance Painter vs PaintCube, the Slant community recommends Substance Painter for most people. In the question“What are the best 3D texture painting softwares?”Substance Painter is ranked 2nd while PaintCube is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Substance Painter is:

Since Substance Painter allows users to paint in full 3D, it can be used not only to paint full textures, but can also paint masks which can then be used in other tools (like Substance Designer) for material filter generators (like the ones used to make edge wear and dirt)

Pros

Pro

Allows you to paint in full 3D

Since Substance Painter allows users to paint in full 3D, it can be used not only to paint full textures, but can also paint masks which can then be used in other tools (like Substance Designer) for material filter generators (like the ones used to make edge wear and dirt)

Pro

Painting and procedural editing of textures

Pro

Accessible on the web

You can use this software on your devices for as long as it has a browser. This means you can work on your projects using your personal computer, laptop, and soon on your tablet.

Pro

Supports layers

You can build your work in layers of texture information as you complete your model.

Cons

Con

Expensive and impossible to run without an expensive graphics card

The free trial is the only thing free. You'll have to pay a lot of money for the full version, and even if you do get it, you will have to pay for an expensive graphics card to use it, which means a lot more money flying out of your wallet and/or bank account.

Con

Cannot export in a procedural format

You can not export substance (sbsar) files in Painter.

Con

14 day trial

Limited options during trial.

Con

Still in Beta

Alternative Products

Each month, over 2.8 million people use Slant to find the best products and share their knowledge. Pick the tags you’re passionate about to get a personalized feed and begin contributing your knowledge.