No Lateness!

Our Guarantees

Technology and Criminal Justice Agencies Essay.

Our writers will deliver plagiarism-free paper on this assignment. Order with us today!

Details:Introduction: This assignment examines the application of various technologies by criminal justice agencies. Tasks: Some of the technologies that are in use and being developed for criminal justice agencies are listed here. Identify the sort of criminal justice agencies for which these technologies can be best applied. Why do you think a particular technology is best suited for certain criminal justice agencies? In addition, discuss any potential ethical implications of these technologies: *Beanbag rounds, which are pellet-loaded bags that unfurl into a spinning pancake *Computerized crime mapping *Reverse 911 *Wall-climbing reconnaissance robots and futuristic \”sound cannons\”

Here’s a snippet of the essay.

Technological revolution is rapidly sweeping the world and the justice system may not be spared. The work of court systems, police agencies, community systems, police agencies and other institutions that create the justice system have been entangled in the technological wave. Various technological breakthroughs have been integrated and the justice system is never the same. The police now use beanbag rounds against criminals; judges have adopted the computerized crime mapping as a probation condition, reverse 911 has revolutionized the public safety address systems, and even more, wall-climbing reconnaissance robots have dogged the justice system. The major question dwells in the ethical implications of these advanced technologies. This paper brings an in-depth look at each of these technologies, and analyzes how appropriate each of them is in the realm of criminal justice.

The Beanbag Rounds

The beanbag rounds are batons fired from short guns and used for less fatal apprehension of criminal suspects. The police deem these rounds appropriate for use. They deliver a low impact blow that may only trigger minimal long-term trauma to suspects, without penetration, and resulting to muscle spasms. The reaction should render the suspect immobile. These rounds may be best appropriate when an individual is subjected to danger but the magnitude of the threat does no necessitate a deadly force. This may be perceived as an effective way of apprehending suspects; however, immense ethical implications surround their use. There is much scrutiny as whether the circumstances under which they are used may have been reasonably appropriate. In some cases, the buttons have resulted to deaths, in the US; they cause almost a death a year (Ken, 2004, 10).