Hi,
I am not sure why you are seeing this difference. Without the actual
code (nuwa.py) I can't think of a way to reproduce or debug it. I can
confirm that the Torque scheduling happens as expected, so nothing
wrong with the PBS directives themselves. Sorry.
Prakash
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Abhishek Gupta wrote:
> Here is the script we are running. This is basically a test script
> of the actual script to test the performance.
>> #!/bin/bash
> #PBS -j oe
> #PBS -o qsub1.out
> #PBS -m ae
> ###PBS -M abhig at princeton.edu> #PBS -l cput=36:0:0
> ###PBS -l mem=1GB
> #PBS -l nodes=node022
>> date
> echo "start"
> export PATH=.:$PATH
>> source /mnt/dayabay/trunk-source
> cd /mnt/dayabay/project/speedtest
>> time nuwa.py -l4 -n100 -H 345788 -o test1.root -m FullChain >
> test1.log
>> echo "finish"
> date
>>> The command I run during interactively were
> # qsub -I run.sh
>> This took us to node022 and then
> # run.sh
> run.sh is the name of the script I wrote above.
>> When job was finished, I run exit.
>> Abhi.
>> Prakash Velayutham wrote:
>>>> Send your job commands when you run them interactively and also
>> send the contents of your batch file.
>>>> Prakash
>>>> On Jul 13, 2009, at 4:42 PM, abhig at Princeton.EDU wrote:
>>>>> Hi Prakash,
>>> Thanks for your reply. I tried running job interactively and it
>>> seems that it is running normal. But ssh based job is running
>>> slow. Any further suggestion?
>>> Abhi.
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon 13/07/09 4:06 PM , Prakash Velayutham prakash.velayutham at cchmc.org>>> sent:
>>> What is the job? And what does your batch file look like?
>>>>>> The best way to debug would be to use "qsub -I" and see if
>>> interactive PBS job also runs slow compared to a direct SSH-based
>>> job (job being the same). Then go from there.
>>>>>> Prakash
>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2009, at 3:55 PM, abhig at Princeton.EDU wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>> The jobs with PBS are running very slow. Earlier I was thinking
>>>> that it might be because of rcp so I tried configuring a node
>>>> with usecp. The log file shows that it read the usecp parameter
>>>> but the speed is still slow. Can someone suggest me anything? The
>>>> same job running interactively take almost half the time.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Abhi.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> torqueusers mailing list
>>>>torqueusers at supercluster.org>>>>http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torqueusers/attachments/20090713/2f01912d/attachment-0001.html