The editors of Pig Health Today are acutely aware of the hardships facing the pork industry as it responds to plant closures, labor shortages and other challenges resulting from the pandemic.

At the same time, we recognize that maintaining herd health and biosecurity are vital to the industry’s long-term security and sustainability. We therefore will continue to report on the latest news and information to help the pork industry meet this goal. As always, we welcome your comments and editorial suggestions.

Study compares PRRSV antibody-sampling options for sows

When it comes to porcine reproductive and respiratory virus (PRRSV) it’s important for the veterinarian and farm personnel to know the health status of a herd or barn. Today, serum is the “gold standard” for antibody detection; however, it is somewhat inconvenient because collection requires technical skill, time and effort.

Some have dabbled with sampling colostrum and milk to determine PRRSV antibody levels in sows, but the numbers have been limited. Of course, any alternative method will need to provide sampling ease as well as confidence in the results.

“In this study, the objective was to compare the PRRSV antibody detection in serum samples to those detected in fecal samples collected at similar time points,” Sam Baker, veterinary student at Iowa State University, told Pig Health Today. He conducted the study in two phases.1

Study design

In phase 1, Baker collected serum and fecal samples 1 week before the sows farrowed. Based on the serum PRRS ELISA test results, he identified a subset of 15 sows with a low sample-to-positive ratio (S/P ratio) and 15 with a high S/P ratio.

For phase 2, as those 30 sows began to farrow, Baker collected colostrum and feces from each sow within 24 hours. He then collected milk and feces samples from those sows within 72 hours post-farrowing.

“In the statistical analysis, I was looking for an association between milk, serum or colostrum PRRSV antibody levels and fecal antibody levels,” he noted.

The results

The relationship of PRRSV antibody levels in sow feces, serum, milk and colostrum is reported in the accompanying graphs. Baker offers the following summary:

Based on those correlations, Baker concluded that “fecal samples may be an appropriate, easier-to-obtain sample than serum or colostrum” to determine the PRRSV antibody level within a sow herd. “Fecal ELISA testing may provide a more consistent PRRSV antibody S/P ratio than serum-, colostrum- or milk-sample testing,” he added. That’s because the sow’s hydration states, the colostrum/milk production stage and piglet suckling activity can all impact the sample.

Baker noted that additional, larger-scale testing would be beneficial, as would evaluating fecal antibody-sampling prospects for other swine pathogens, such as circovirus.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.