Clinical Applications of Learning Theory provides professional reports on the state of research about how humans learn. Humans (and other animals) learn based on the connections between events. As the editors state:

Broadly speaking, learning theorists concern themselves studying the mechanisms by which animals, including humans, acquire and utilize information about relations between events. This endeavor includes the study of classical conditioning, instrumental conditioning, and the neural substrates that underlie these phenomena.1

Source

Classical conditioning refers to the well-known Pavolovian stimulus-response form of learning. For example, suppose that someone received the news that their spouse died by telephone at 1:00 o'clock a.m. Thereafter, every time that individual heard the phone ring at about 1:00 o'clock a.m., they became very anxious. Thus, news of a death alone is no longer necessary to produce anxiety; the phone ringing about 1:00 a.m. suffices.

Instrumental conditioning, or operant conditioning, occurs when reward or punishment is used to increase the likelihood that a behavior will or will not be repeated. For example, suppose that a child receives praise every time that they seek to go to the toilet on their own. The child's desire to receive the praise may reinforce notifying the parent that the child wants to go to the toilet, and thus advance potty training.

Source

Research about the neural substrates of behavior has arisen not only from observation, but also from studying brain malfunctions, such as the physical changes in the brains of stroke victims, for example. Such brain insults can produce behavioral changes in the individual suffering the malfunctions. For example, a brain injury may cause a formerly easy going individual to become unduly angry over events that previously did not cause such a result. Stating the formula in a simple form: brain malfunction = psychological symptoms = behavior. Back tracking from behavioral changes that may not seem to be related to the actual, physical injury may identify workings of the brain not previously known

Discussion

This reader found the following described chapters in the book of particular interest.

Chapter 2, Avoidance, anxiety, and aversion in the clinical setting, by Michelle Symonds and Geoffrey Hall.

One may wonder at times why one sibling is afraid of dogs, and another is not. Of course, the difference may be simple common sense. The dog bite that the 2-year-old you suffered makes you anxious around dogs, but not your brother. The authors explain how the framework and analysis may be much more complex. For example, one sibling may have a shy personality, while the other is outgoing. This difference is probably based on genetic or physiological structure, and, as a result, may require different treatment than merely applying the traditional types of conditioning. That is, a sibling may not recover from fear of dogs just by being around friendly dogs. Some other approach that mediates the genetic structure of the brain areas involved in fear may be necessary.

The authors of this chapter are "interested in identifying how exposure to the drug interacts with the individual's psychological constitution[.]" Addiction may be caused by more than just (a) overuse alone; or (b) predisposition plus use or overuse. There is a complex interaction between an individual's viewpoint or personality, and whether addiction occurs or is recovered from. That is, for those who are made of tougher stuff, recovery from addiction may be much simpler than for those gentler souls who tend to hear things that go bump in the night. In the latter case, just overcoming the physical effects of addition will not do.

In this chapter, the authors explore the nature of the placebo/nocebo response, including whether it exists at all. Significantly, as with all things generally, the placebo/nocebo response works across a spectrum of human makeups. That is, one individual may be susceptible to the belief that a drug will work, and it will work, even if such individual received a placebo. That is the the classic placebo effect. The opposite can also be true: an individual can have a negative response to an inert substance, simply because the individual believes it will be harmful. That is the nocebo response. The physiological effect is real in either case. However, some drugs or treatments work despite individual belief (or lack thereof) in their efficacy. Studying the physiology and neurology of individuals who are capable of producing a placebo/nocebo effect, as well as those who don't, should advance knowledge of the interface between treatment and individual makeup.

CONCLUSION

I am a lay reader, not an expert in learning theory in any sense, except to the extent that any attentive mother and grandmother is. Thus, this reader emphasizes that the material in the book being reviewed can be slow (or no) going to lay person, at least in part. However, if a lay reader is interested in learning theory, useful information about how the learning brain works may be obtained here.

Footnotes

You may also be interested in:

Learning Theories and PersonalityAlbert Bandura’s reciprocal determinism maintains that there is a “mutual relationship among behavior, cognitive factors, and environment.”

Materialization of an Expectation via Placebo EffectHealing through placebo effect works via psyche of the person being filled with an expectation. This fakes the reality and sets in a process of self-healing of the body due to a feeling of well-being in the mind of the person.

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)

Google AdSense Host API

This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

Facebook Login

You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

Maven

This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.

Conversion Tracking Pixels

We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics

Author Google Analytics

This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)

Comscore

ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)

Amazon Tracking Pixel

Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)