Can someone post a link to a site or thread that explains the Thiele-Small parameters WITH EXAMPLES. What I mean, is there a site that explains beyond the actual definition of each parameter and tells what to look for in each parameter (good vs bad). EXAMPLE: A high Qts mean the driver will do such and such; a low Qts means the driver will be better suited for such and such, ect, ect.

In terms of examples, Morgan Jones' Arpeggio article is as good as it gets!

We all figure out a Qts of 0.5 gives a closed box driver suitable for the Vas value of enclosure size. A driver with a Qts of 0.38 is optimal in a reflex box equal to the Vas.

What Morgan also explains is how to add resistance to a REFLEX driver to keep optimal damping in a big CLOSED box, because otherwise it is overdamped, so as to use it with a valve amp with a significant output impedance, aka low damping factor.

It's a neat trick when designing a speaker for valve amplifiers, along with impedance correction of the typical midrange impedance peak.

"It had to happen at some point, we’ve hit the Q word. Q is basically a describing word, it is used to describe a quality or characteristic about an electrical or mechanical part of the driver. So Qts is the overall Q of the driver, both electrical and mechanical. Qts can be thought of as how strong the motor and magnet system are. A driver with a low Qts of around 0.20 would have a large magnet and be able to move the cone with a lot of force. This makes for a tight driver. A driver with a Qts of 0.45 would have a smaller magnet and less control over its cone. So low values of Qts give a tight and punchy sound but with little weight or low bass and high Qts values give a slow and heavy sound that will give you lots of low frequency output. Watch out for drivers with really high Qts values of 0.6 or above, these would require such a big box to work correctly that in normal size boxes you don’t get much low end. They are better of being used on the rear parcel shelf of your car, where they can enjoy a massive rear chamber. "

A driver with a low Qts will need a lot of support from the cabinet in order to achieve good LF response.
Those with higher Qts can get a half-decent response on an infinite baffle, where the cabinet isn't helping the output at all.
Really high Qts drivers can be used in lossy arrangements, such as open baffles, and still hit 40Hz with little eq required.

The ratio of Qes and Qms tells you how the overall damping is made up. For modern drivers, its Qes dominated. This can make speakers quite sensitive to series resistance, which raises the Qes (thus Qts, by the way they're calculated) as the amplifier is slightly decoupled from the voice coil.

The bit about Qms I'll ignore: some say lower is better, some say higher. You can easily tell which side that particular author comes down on.

Last bit: "Drivers with a low BL value of 20 or less will be less able to control their cones. These drivers will not feel as tight as those with higher BL’s. They will also normally have higher Qts values of over 0.28 and while at home in ported or bandpass cabinets I call these drivers mud motors because of there slow and heavy sound with a less than perfect transient response."

Check the BL of a tweeter or midrange driver. Do they sound like mud to you?

I could probably go on, but I'll stop at this point as life's too short to correct the whole internet

My speakers have a Qts of 0.7 and live in a 55ltr sealed box with an f3 of around 45Hz. Box Q is 0.85. I'd be more than happy to compare them to any ported speaker, to show that a box Q of 0.85 is still pretty tight and much tighter than any ported box i've heard (and i've owned plenty of ported boxes).

Qts gives you a rough idea of what type of box to put your driver in (eg sealed or ported). I've seen lower Qts drivers that have a very low fs so will still work well in a sealed box (eg the Scanspeak 21W/8555-00)