In 1913, Congressman
Charles Lindbergh said: "When the President signs this bill; the
invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalized…The day of
reckoning is only a few years removed."

Prophetic words.

The establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913 set off a chain of
baneful events that blighted the 20th century and darkens our
prospects for the 21st. It began with World War One and the Great
Depression, and continues with the WTC and the upcoming war on Iraq.

In 1913, America's leaders were bribed and bamboozled by mostly foreign
bankers and their US agents. Our leaders committed treason by giving these
bankers the power to create money out of thin air backed only by the
credit, i.e. taxes, of the American people. The U.S. government now
borrows its own money from international bankers and pays them interest to
the tune of $360 billion per annum for the privilege.

If you hoodwinked the United States in this fashion, what would you do?

You would either give the magical power back to its rightful owner, the US
government.

Or, you would use it to take over the world, to own everything and to
control everyone.

Guess which choice the bankers made?

I haven't got all the pieces of the puzzle. But I believe modern history
displays a long-term plan by dynastic banking families and their allies to
create an Orwellian World dictatorship ("New World Order") in
which wealth will be further concentrated, and human life will be further
degraded.

Wars and depressions, modern art and culture, new age religion, sexual
"liberation" and feminism, are all part of this design. The role
of historians and the mass media is to obscure this plan and to beguile
the masses into thinking they are free and their leaders represent their
interests.

This conviction was reinforced by Col. Curtis Dall's book, "FDR: My
Exploited Father-in-Law" (1970). Dall, who was married to Franklin
Roosevelt's daughter Anna, spent many nights at the White House and often
guided FDR around in his wheelchair. He was also a partner at a Wall
Street brokerage.

Dall maintained a family loyalty but could not avoid several disheartening
conclusions in his book. He portrays the legendary president not as a
leader but as a "quarterback" with little actual power. The
"coaching staff" consisted of a coterie of handlers
("advisers" like Louis Howe, Bernard Baruch and Harry Hopkins)
who represented the international banking cartel. For Dall, FDR ultimately
was a traitor manipulated by "World Money" and motivated by
conceit and personal ambition.

FDR's main perfidy was suppressing information about the Japanese attack
on Pearl Harbor, at the cost of almost 3,000 lives. He did this because
the bankers needed US involvement in WWII, something 85% of Americans
opposed. The Japanese had instructions to call off the attack if they lost
the element of surprise.

Dall relates a less known but more telling anecdote. In 1956, George
Earle, a former governor of Pennsylvania, told him that in 1943 the Nazis
tried to surrender. At the time, Earle was Naval Attaché in Istanbul when
Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, head of the German Secret Service, approached him
personally. Canaris told him that the German generals felt Hitler was
leading Germany to destruction. They could not accept Roosevelt's policy
of "unconditional surrender," but if FDR would offer "honourable
surrender," the army was prepared to stage a coup d'etat. They
believed that Russia represented a threat to Western Civilization and they
were ready to present a non-Nazi German bulwark against Communist designs
in Eastern Europe.

To make a long story short, FDR repeatedly ignored this proposal which
could have ended the war in 1943 and saved millions of lives. Canaris and
hundreds of other decent German officers were tortured and killed by the
Gestapo. The bankers' policy, as exhibited by the fire bombing of German
cities, was clearly to 1) prolong the war and inflict maximum damage on
Germany, 2) ensure that Soviet Russia occupy Eastern Europe and become a
major world power.

This is consistent with Dall's other observations. The banking cartel
acted as if Communist Russia was their personal creation, which it was.
One of FDR's first acts in office was to recognize the Soviet regime. FDR
advisers Henry Morgenthau and Harry Dexter White arranged for U.S.
treasury printing plates to be sent to Russia so the Communists could
print their own US money. They arranged $8 billion in lend lease aid to
Russia after the war was over. Col. Dall personally confronted
Louis Howe over Russian agents he saw meeting Howe in the White House.

According to Antony Sutton ("Wall Street and the Bolshevik
Revolution"), the Bolshevik Revolution was funded by
international bankers. In 1917, Trotsky and 200 revolutionaries were
literally transferred from New York's Lower East Side to St. Petersburg to
foment the revolution.

What are we to make of all this?

First, we have to recognize that monopoly capital has an affinity with
Communism. Both are enemies of competition and freedom. A Communist
government can give the cartels control of raw materials and markets. It
can provide huge contracts and take on huge debts. A Communist government
can ensure social control in order to protect the concentration of wealth.
Each sector of the US economy is now controlled by a handful of cartels.
Could we be facing Communism with private instead of public monopoly?

Is it a coincidence that the Communist Party term "politically
correct" has entered the American lexicon?

Second, it is no secret (except in the mass media) that the bankers are
establishing a "world government" which they control. This
requires that national sovereignty and democracy be undermined. In World
War One, the bankers destroyed Tsarist Russia and contained Germany's
national aspirations; in the Second World War, they finished off Germany
and empowered Communist Russia.

What is their goal of the so-called "war on terror"? On one
level, it is an oil-motivated imperialist war against Muslim countries
that resist the New World Order. Israelis and Americans are being deceived
and used to fight and pay for this war. On Monday the bankers conjured up
another $76 billion loan which US taxpayers will be repaying for a long
time.

But given the previous pattern, I wonder if the goal isn't also to further
undermine the independence and national confidence of the United States.
This will certainly happen if the war is long, costly, and bloody.