From what I could gather, I presume that you are arguing for the creationist point of view. I firmly believe that god does not exist, because there is little to zero logical evidence, which supports the god theroy.

Creation by design is improbable at best. We know this is not only possible, but extremely likely, as stated by the theroy of evolution. Furthermore, God most definitely does not exist, because of glaring contradictions with the god theroy such as the omnipotence paradox, [Modernally stated as "Can god create a stone to heavy for himself to lift?], Which proves that total omnipotence is completely and logically invalid.

Your "Nut in a nutshell" analogy is poor a best. To better restate this, is to say, "Does a god exist?" And, logically, a god cannot exist, because of the paradoxical nature of omnipotence, which defies logic. So it is reasonable to asume there is no god.

Lies are a biproduct of human nature, I never stated they don't exist. But god most definetly does NOT exist. By simply stating that "Lies exist", you prove nothing, just the obvious fact that lies are things which exist.