The case against an Apple television, plus 4 other Apple stories to read today

With so many people writing about Apple(s AAPL), finding the best stories and reports isn’t easy. Here’s our daily pick of stories about the company from around the Web that you shouldn’t miss:

Not everyone thinks Apple will do a television set. Pacific Crest analyst Andy Hargreaves makes a case against it, including that “investment in Apple television makes little sense without a unique” content offering. Read Fortune’s take here.

Remember Psystar? A string of judges said the company was not entitled to sell their own computers with Apple’s OS X operating system, still they took their appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. On Monday, the justices declined to hear the case, CNET reports.

Following a flurry of both rumors and news about what Apple has planned in the coming months, PC World has a good forecast of what we could see (or not) at WWDC in June.

Despite changing the name from iPad with Wi-FI + 4G to iPad with Wi-Fi + Cellular, Apple is not off the hook in Australia. The country’s top watchdog group, the Australia Competition and Consumer Commission, that sued the iPad maker over the product name for being misleading will still get its day in court with Apple, writes the SmartHouse blog.