Imagine you’re in space high above the north pole looking down on the earth, the circle of the earth therefrom seen being the earth’s equator (the northern hemisphere within the circle), then as the earth’s axis, tilting 23.5 degrees, wobbles at the rate of 72 yrs/degree, its rate of precession, as the earth spins and rotates around the sun, thereby the axis of the earth within that polar projection circle is like the hand of a clock, moving the radius length of the earth in moving 1/6th of the way around the polar projection circle, the nature of hexagon geometry, knowing the radius length of the earth the key to the accurate ancient measurement of its circumference, as explained in article #2 at http://iceagecivilizations.com.

Watch the hard-working illegal aliens, needing “honest jobs,” stay home on Nov. 2 for the midterm elections, knowing that Obama’s policies are killing the private sector where the jobs are, unless we want this to become a once-great nation where everybody is paid by monopolistic governmental entities, which would certainly be strange, wouldn’t it? And from where would they obtain the money to pay everybody without a private sector to tax for the public? And would anybody be an illegal alien under full “liberal” dominance?

When the ancient egyptians and canaanites told the hebrews that the gods of nature supply water for the streams and rivers from two sources, from the sky and from the earth, the hebrews familiar with Job 26:8 and 36:27-28, and just applying commonsense really, surely must have giggled at their unscientific notion, because of course if you watch a boiling pot of hot water, you can see water evaporating to form clouds; could it not be more obvious that is the mechanism? Yet the ancient priests of the pagan religions convinced their followers of the unscientific, like darwinism today, trying to defend the indefensible, powered ‘though by the desire to battle the Word of God.

The book of Job was written in Uz, today known as Uzbekistan, along the Gorgon river, when it wasn’t ‘though a desert region there then, but was a land of pastures and forests as described in the text, the Gorgon surely then having flowed much wider and deeper, where the Leviathan lurked, only centuries after Noah’s Flood. So if you wonder about the cause of the ice age, consider the hydrologic science in the book of Job, and the fountains of the great deep, geothermally heated water from the mantle which caused the ocean to have been warmer in the aftermath of Noah’s Flood, the sea level little changed since the end of the ice age due to evaporation (as the hebrews knew) despite the huge rivers of the world flowing into the sea.

And do you really think the learned ancient hebrews, obviously very knowledgable in science, thought the earth was flat? That is what the darwinists would have you believe, but when you see article #2 at http://iceagecivilizations.com, it’s clearly the means by which they determined the length for the cubit measure, used for Noah’s Ark, and the Great Pyramid of Giza, and to measure and map the earth, so spread the word, that young earth creationism, clearly reasonable, be presented alongside the typical darwinian dogma, to compare and contrast, for the sake of intellectual honesty.

Would it be fair to ask the muslims you may know (as they’re not supposed to consort with non muslims) whether or not they believe the parts of the Koran and Hadith stating that killing infidels is fine if the infidels won’t submit to Islam, the way shown by their role model Muhammad? And similarly, would it be fair to ask judaists whether or not they believe adulturors should be stoned-to-death as espoused in the old testament of the Bible and carried out by the Judges? You’d hope they’d all say no, but where would that lead them, to atheism, or to their biblical messiah Jesus Christ? It really should be a no brainer, particularly after you have read chapter 23 of the free ebook download of my first book, Old Earth? Why Not!

If not that the Bible has the answer, it would be surprising that mainstream scientists cannot determine the cause of the ice age, the cause actually so obvious, yet since the clue to the answer is in the Bible, they (at least subconsciously) don’t consider the hydrology of Noah’s Flood, fueled by the “fountains of the great deep,” so warmer ocean water in the aftermath of the flood, then the much greater evaporation off the warmer ocean for the dense cloudcover for the ice age. It’s just hydrology 101, yet a huge blindspot for the mainstream scientists who hate to say the Bible is right, obviously hampering seriously their ability to rationally analyze data.

A pot of water upon a heating element turned-off produces no steam (for clouds), but turn it on, place a clear lid on it, and watch the dynamic for the ice age, the evaporation forming clouds of water droplets on the underside of the lid, like it was during the ice age, when the runaway plate tectonics of the biblical flood year (see http://globalflood.org) ended with the ocean on average around eighty degrees f., where now the average temp is fifty, the cooling having taken about nine hundred years from circa 2400 b.c. to 1500 b.c., good science, but not what you’ll hear coming from mainstream academia, so I hope you will support the soon up and running Genesis Veracity Foundation, bringing intellectual honesty to the public debate.

Christine O’Donnell asked Chris Coons where “separation of church and state” is written in the Constitution, to which Coons gave a convoluted answer in admitting it’s not there, so guess what? The liberal pundits who usually mock O’Donnell are silent on this point, because if the public would focus on the First Amendment, they would see that each state can decide if they want an official state religion; yes it’s true, clearly what the Founding Fathers intended, and so, such as rino Morning Joe aren’t talking about this “O’Donnell gaffe,” but no gaffe at all, a teachable moment, wouldn’t you say?

And Sharon Angle in Nevada said that some hispanic students look oriental, so what’s the big deal? The liberal talking heads are tripping all over themsevles in condemnation, when but this too is a teachable moment brought on by another christian tea party woman candidate; the humankind and the races of it are of one syngameon, the analytic genetic term which Angle, Palin, and O’Donnell should use in attacking darwinian evolution, taught as established fact in the public schools, laughable really if it weren’t so sad, maybe to be corrected with those precocious lady tea party candidates.

No doubt the dense cloudcover during the ice age in the aftermath of Noah’s Flood made the ancient precession-rate cartographers’ star triangulation navigation (see http://iceagecivilizations.com) more difficult, but readings for position while sailing across the ocean need have been taken only for a few minutes every few days, with the proper bearing of the ship in the interim generally maintained by the position of the sun on the horizon at dawn or dusk, so the dense cloudcover brought-on by the warmer ocean after the cataclysm of “the fountains of the great deep,” explained at http://globalflood.org, was no problem for the precession navigators. And here’s a great overview, http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.

The left “progressive” New York Times’ ace marxist writer Sam Tanenhaus really stepped-in-it this day on Morning Joe, when the capricious Lesley Stahl (who sometimes backs into brilliance) innocently asked why are there so many female republican tea party candidates? To which Tanenhaus responded it’s because they run the money as housewives in the household, and so, hate the government’s drunken sailor spending ways. Sam was doing fine at that point, citing some reality for a change, also that conservative women are motivated and willing to do the work for political campaigns, but then the wheels came off, “like licking stamps, more women’s work” said Tanenhaus. Oh boy, you could almost see the flaming liberals on the upper east side dropping their lattes at that point, as Mika Brzenzski sat there listening, looking like somebody had just told her that her morning joe had been laced with boogers, very entertaining tv.

The Bible says that the progeny of Ham would settle much of the globe, the great first navigators of the post Deluge world, so it’s no surprise that the name of Ham is all over ancient geography and legend. He was Khem of ancient Egypt, Cham of Chambodia and now flooded Chambay of India, and the japhetic greeks named him Chiron, or Chronos, the time man, but what kind of time? Precession time, in order to measure and map the earth, the grandfather of Posidon, and great grandfather of Atlas, all who navigated by the method explained in article #2 at http://iceagecivilizations.com, have you learned it in school yet? It’s about time, wouldn’t you say?

With extremely compelling information for young earth creationism, such as at this website, it’s no wonder creationists equipped with it are not challenged by the shuttered darwinists, who’d rather not engage, to avoid having to attempt to explain away the submerged ruins, ancient mapping by the earth’s wobble rate, syngameons over species, ice age’s cause a warmer ocean, and the repeopling of the earth by sea; all really irrefutable when analyzed, and the darwinists know it, so the debates everybody wants to see aren’t happening, because the darwinists hide for lack of solid material, certain to flame-out in a rigorous debate, their claims under close scrutiny.

The entrenched liberal scientists who say the matter of the universe developed from nothing, but not created, defy physics really with their notion, after all, wouldn’t you say that matter coming from nothing is really something? Can you make stuff appear out of thin air? So why would nothing feel (if it were possible) induced to change itself into something? What could cause nothing to become something other than the creator of that something? It’s really first grade logic, but too much I guess for those who do not want to deal with the straightforward history of humankind’s struggle in the physical and spiritual worlds, not what an atheist wants to think about, yet they do.