1 World Trade Center tower crowned nation’s tallest building by panel of architects

The Willis Tower in Chicago, left, is shorter than the new 1 World Trade Center tower in lower Manhattan, right, because the New York City structure’s spire can be included in calculating the building’s height, a panel of architects has decided.
AP file photos

CHICAGO >> The new 1 World Trade Center tower in Manhattan will replace Chicago’s Willis Tower as the nation’s tallest building when it is completed next year, an international panel of architects announced Tuesday.

The Height Committee of the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat said that because the needle atop the New York skyscraper is a permanent spire, not an antenna, it can be counted when measuring the structure’s height.

The needle, which is 408 feet tall, was more than enough to confirm Chicago is the Second City when it comes to tall buildings.

With the needle, 1 World Trade Center is a symbolically important 1,776 feet tall. Without it, the building would have been only 1,368 feet tall — well short of the 1,451-foot Willis Tower (formerly the Sears Tower).

At stake was more than just the pride of two cities that feast on superlatives and the tourist dollars that might follow: 1 World Trade Center, with its beacon on top, will stand as a monument to those killed in the 9/11, attacks, and its architects had sought to capture the echo of America’s founding year in the structure’s height.

The building’s height without the needle also holds symbolism because, at 1,368, feet it is the same height of the World Trade Center twin towers that were destroyed in the 2001 attacks.

Antony Wood, the council’s executive director, said the needle is particularly important as a “structural and symbolic element.” Further, he said, the decision to put the spire atop the building was part of a “quest” to build a permanent reminder of what the nation went through.

“This was not an economic quest for bragging rights to the U.S.’s tallest,” he said. “This was a quest to put something meaningful and symbolic on that site because of the horrible history of what happened on that site.”

The new 1 World Trade Center tower stands just to the south of where the twin towers stood.

Wood said the antennae on top of the Willis Tower helped to make the committee’s point about permanence, explaining that when the building went up, there were no antennae and that the original antennae have been replaced with taller ones.

Wood also noted made another point that, though not a factor on the committee’s decision, is significant: The Willis Tower will continue to be an attraction for years, just like the Empire State Building in Manhattan is decades after it, too, was eclipsed by taller buildings.

“Are any fewer people going to come to Chicago or even travel and visit the Willis Tower because it no longer holds the title of the U.S. tallest?” he asked. “No, I don’t think it does.”

The Height Committee comprises about two dozen industry professionals from all over the world and is widely recognized as the final arbiter of official building heights. The members conferred behind closed doors last week in Chicago, where the world’s first skyscraper appeared in 1884.

The designers of the 1 World Trade Center tower originally intended to enclose the mast’s communications gear in decorative cladding made of fiberglass and steel. But the developer removed that exterior shell from the design, saying it would be impossible to properly maintain or repair. Without it, the question was whether the mast was now primarily just a broadcast antenna.