Where
to start. Let's begin with the statement I made in
my last column that women will vote for Marxist Hillary Clinton just
because she has two mammary glands and a vagina. This brought quite a
bit of angry emails from "empowered" females who can't list the first
ten Bill of Rights, know nothing about federal jurisdiction, have zero
idea how the social security taxing scheme works or where their "income"
tax dollars actually go, but they can tell you who wore Prada at their
last "empowerment" luncheon. All they want is a female elected, even if
it's an "ignorant" vote as so stated by Holly in
this 2:16 second video clip. "I am voting for Hillary because she
is a woman and I don't care if that is an ignorant reason, I want a woman
in charge." The day before and "Super Tuesday" itself, I watched female
political pundits and party strategists (Democrats) literally salivating
as they spoke of Marxist Clinton winning and taking the White House. These
are the voices of America's destruction.

So,
you see, it doesn't matter that Hillary Clinton, just like her husband,
are dedicated Marxists pushing
the communist agenda disguised as liberalism, just so long as it's
a female. A female who cries just before voting day, i.e., Clinton teared
up the day before the phony New Hampshire primary and allegedly won. Women
gushed over that one; they felt her pain! On February 4, 2008, she pulled
the same trick for votes less than 24 hours before this "Super Tuesday"
sham. This reminds me of the scene towards the end of the movie, Shrek,
where the king and Fiona are about to get married. Everytime King Farquar
said something, the lackeys held up placards so the audience knew when
to "awww," clap or cheer.

Millions
of these "empowered" women are the same ones who have killed their unborn
baby, the beating heart growing in their womb via abortion. How many of
these females like the Holly, above understand that abortion was/is a
critical tool of the communists?

The
Free
Market Case Against Abortion. "Legalized abortion has it roots in
Marxism, socialism, and egalitarianism. Lenin and his communist Bolsheviks
were the first ones to widely and openly legalize and advocate abortion
as a woman's right. Communism viewed abortion as a vital part of implementing
Marx's and Engel's Communist Manifesto and their desire for the "Abolition
of the family!" and liberation of women who were oppressed by capitalism,
marriage, and the family."

I've
also received a number of emails from males angry because I said in the
aforementioned column that only sissy men will vote for Hillary. Guess
what? I stand by my statement that wimpy (weak) men will vote for Hillary
Clinton. They want a matriarch sitting in the White House, which would
be a disaster for this republic. Do they even understand what a matriarch
is? A matriarch is defined as: a clan-mother or 'chief'; an autocratic
female ruler of a human family. America has already suffered through
one year of such failure in the form of Nancy Pelosi.
Do these males who want to shed their manhood by supporting Clinton even
understand what the word autocratic means? Here you go: tyrannical, despotic,
domineering.

As for
Clinton's Marxist cultural roots, Carey Roberts' superb column
here lays it out in living color. If you
click here, you will see several more pages from SECRET which I covered
in a recent column, providing proof of Bill and Hillary Clinton's link
to terrorist organizations and communist indoctrination. There's zero
difference between her and Obama. No? Look at these numbers: Total votes
"Super Tuesday": Clinton 7,347,971 (50.2%), Obama 7,294,851 (49.8%). If
one candidate had a dramatically difference "message" or "vision," the
numbers would not be almost identical; the only difference is race and
gender.

Supporters
of these two will decry this isn't true, that both of these candidates
are good people who care about you, who want better education in this
county, health care for all and more jobs. It's called baiting the hook
which Obama did in his book, The Audacity of Hope. Buzz words that
work for the desperate. Inculcating the American people to accept communism
has been done incrementally over the decades by Congress, the state legislatures,
the compromised media and the government's indoctrination centers they
call public schools.

Socialism
is the stepping stone to communism. Read
this exchange from February 4, 2008, on the Tucker Carlson show between
Carlson, Patrick Buchanan and Mort Zuckerman, editor in chief of U.S.
News and the chairman and publisher of the New York Daily News:

Zuckerman:
You know the famous line, taxes is the price you pay for civilization.
If we want to include as a minimum standard for civilization in this country
that people have assured health care, taxes is the way it is going to
happen. You may object to it. Overwhelming-

Buchanan:
The guy takes a risk, let him go to the clinic. What about freedom? Isn't
that what this country is about?

Zuckerman:
It's partly what it's about.

Buchanan:
Partly freedom?

Zuckerman:
Yes, it's not the only thing that this country is about. Taking care of
your neighbors, OK, and taking care of the community, is also a part --

Carlson:
Mort has a deep insight to the state of the country right now, which is-I
think what you are essentially saying is people will choose certainty
over the unknown. They will choose socialism over freedom. They want both.
They can't have both. They will choose the former. If it comes down it,
they say, you know what, I will give you my freedom. Make sure everything
is OK.

Buchanan:
Some people will.

Carlson:
I won't. I will fight it until I die.

Zuckerman:
For the millions of people here who feel they have no health care and
it could ruin their entire lives, they would actually support this kind
of a program. There are some people who wouldn't. I grant you that. They
are by far in the minority of this country. This country is not just about
freedom. There are different kinds of freedom. Freedom from the worry
of your family will be bankrupted by health care -- "

See
what I mean? Gus Hall, long time head of the Communist Party USA, said
back in a 1996 interview with the Cleveland Plain-Dealer: "Socialism
in America will come through the ballot box." He was right, and the feminization
of American politics has hastened the process.

Of course,
there are forces that don't want real solutions to health care because
there's too much money coming their way. We also have a nation of people
who refuse to take care of their bodies with a close to 70% overweight
to obese rate, bringing upon themselves health problems. They become the
constant patient I have written about so many times. Congressman Ron Paul
has provided the
genesis for the beginning of the end of one of the finest health care
systems in the world. I also did a column on this
issue and how the scam called 'withholding taxes' keeps the costs
going through the roof. Congressman Paul introduced
a bill eight years ago to get rid of this insidious tax and it went
no where because Congress doesn't want you to keep the fruits of your
labor, they want to keep you tied to the yoke while they play mommy government.

Primary/Caucus
numbers

As for
McCain's alleged wins, first I want to address an allegation flying around
the Internet

Is John
McCain eligible to be elected President ? February 01, 2008 - State Department
Watch - NOT any government agency, but appears to be private individuals

"Senator
John McCain is apparently not eligible to be elected President of the
United States under the clear provisions of the Constitution. McCain is
not a natural born citizen inasmuch as he was born in the U.S. Navy Hospital
in the Panama Canal Zone, which was never part of the United States.

"The
Constitution states, "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen
of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,
shall be eligible for the Office of President." The 14th Amendment did
not alter this provision.

"The
status of the U. S. Navy Hospital in the Panama Canal Zone is described
by the U. S. Department of State in its Foreign Affairs Manual (7FAM1116.1-4(c)):
"Despite widespread popular belief, U. S. military installations abroad
and U. S. diplomatic or consular facilities are not part of the United
States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises
of such a facility is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States
and does not acquire U. S. citizenship by reason of birth. This issue
should be addressed as soon as possible." <>

McCain
was born while his father was active military; Navy. Children born of
active military while on duty assignment outside the U.S. are born U.S.
citizens the same as if they were born in Florida, Indiana or Alaska.
My husband's children were born in Germany while he was stationed there.
Those bases belong to the U.S. even though they're leased from the host
country. When John's children were born, they instantly became a U.S.
citizen as though they were born in a hospital in any state of the Union.

As for
the argument presented above, can you imagine the wife of a sergeant or
general having to catch a plane from Okinawa or Panama just to deliver
the baby on U.S. soil so it would be a U.S. citizen? Does this argument
have merit? I went to the Foreign Affairs Manual (click
here) and I don't believe it does, but perhaps a good constitutional
attorney or professor of law can clarify this legal issue. I wish it were
so because as I said in my last column, it would
be a tragedy if McCain were to ever sit in the Oval Office for two major
reasons: his betrayal of our POWs and his steadfast push to give amnesty
to 20 MILLION illegal aliens.

Let's
talk about Arizona and some of the other "oddities" about "Super Tuesday."
McCain allegedly
won Arizona, a state over run with illegal aliens. McCain is hated
in that state in mass numbers. The only way he could have won was by vote
fraud and illegals voting in large numbers. While John Edwards quit the
race, January 30th, 37,835 people in Illinois allegedly
voted for him on "Super Tuesday." Why would a whopping 37,835 voters
waste their vote on a candidate not even in the race? How about Clinton
allegedly winning Oklahoma? That great state in our Union is known as
a Bible state and so over run by illegal aliens, their legislature finally
did the right thing and passed the strictest laws in the country to punish
employers. So how is it the pro-abortion, pro-sodomy/lesbian, pro-amnesty
Hillary Clinton supposedly won that state? How is it pro-illegals, McCain,
allegedly won that state?

How
about Missouri, also known as a firm pro-life state. Allegedly, just under
800,000 voters in that state voted for pro-abortion activists, Clinton
and Obama? 16, 747 Missourans voted for John Edwards, who is out of the
race. On the GOP side, 3,595 Missourans voted for pro-abortion champion,
Rudy Julie Annie, even though he's not in the race. Does this make any
sense to you? Protest votes? I don't think so, not that many.

The
illegals invasion is one of the top three major concerns of voters along
with the immoral, unconstitutional invasion of Iraq, yet pro-illegals
invasion, war mongering John McCain, also allegedly took nine states.
Does this make any sense to you? Millions of voters in nine states anointed
the one individual who worked the hardest to give illegal aliens amnesty
and has declared he will continue these endless wars even though millions
of people in those states are dead set against those two issues? The same
applies to pro-war candidate, Flip Romney in his alleged five state win.

"Mainstream"
media (including cable networks)

From
the git-go, the controlled media has consistently put out in every state
caucus or primary that Ron Paul, according to polls, shows 4-5%. Guess
what? In every single caucus or primary, his "final" vote total is within
the 4-6% numbers with two exceptions. How remarkable considering the massive
financial and grassroots support he enjoys along with so
many wins in the straw polls category. Even John Zogby, one of the
most respected polling experts in this country is wondering why
there's no support at the polls? The answer is simple: vote fraud.
Dr. Paul's people do the same polling and watch outside polling; they
are not novices. Alaska was primed for Ron Paul and his acquisition of
their 29 delegates; see
here. Of course, the outcome was completely different with Romney
allegedly winning 44%, Brother Huck 22%, Ron Paul 17% and McCain 15%.
I don't believe it for a second, not in that state. How about West Virginia's
caucus? Not
a single GOP vote for a delegate in the entire state for Ron Paul?
Not one single Republican in West Virginia believes in freedom and liberty?
Yes, Dr. Paul does have an organization in that state, click
here.

Maine
was another state where Congressman Paul should have taken the lion's
share; see here. Of
course, the outcome was just the opposite. Romney allegedly won with 52%
of the vote, McCain with 22%, Ron Paul with 19% and Brother Huck with
5%. The alleged vote difference between the national front runner, McCain,
and Ron Paul: 7
votes.

The
morning of "Super Tuesday," FAUX (FOX) News network's web site had five
large photos of candidates, Clinton, Obama, Huckabee, Romney and McCain.
Anyone looking at the screen would assume these five were the only candidates
on the ballot for both parties that day. FAUX deliberately left Ron Paul
off their front page. Take a look
at this leading page for CNN's web site. You will see the five candidates
in large photos. Under the three on the GOP side, Ron Paul's name is in
small letters, no photo. This same marginalization has also been a constant
on MSNBC. Here and there you'll see some coverage as shown in the link
above regarding Dr. Paul and Maine. However, this presidential race has
been extraordinary in the shameful and disgraceful tactics by these networks
and major newspapers across this country towards one candidate. They're
nothing more than pimps for their masters and cheating the American people
in the process. As these networks and major newspaper chains are not government
entities, the only remedy is to stop buying their newspapers and refuse
to patronize network sponsors.

Can
you help me?

I know
all of this is very discouraging, but Ron Paul is in this for the long
haul. We know vote fraud is playing a major role here. Don't think
any of this is over yet, not by a long shot. While Ron Paul supporters
didn't expect him to outright win some of these states, we know the fraud
has kept him from placing high in many states.

As I
explained in my last column, the partial recount done by the Kucinich
people and the half dozen counties now counted on the GOP side in New
Hampshire show the numbers do not match in dozens of precincts. It's too
early to give a report yet. I refuse to roll over just because it's the
path of least resistance. I'm collecting as much as I can about these
primaries. However, I need your help. This won't cost you anything except
maybe 15-20 minutes of your time. I'm willing to do this unpaid work,
but I need some data from some of the states. Specifically, if you live
in these states, I need your assistance: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California,
Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Oklahoma and Tennessee.
Please just send me a short email (devvyk@earthlink.net)
and I'll get back to you.

Devvy Kidd authored
the booklets, Why
A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty;
2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country,
ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy belongs
to no organization.

She left the Republican
Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't
left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes
in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Her web site
(www.devvy.com) contains a tremendous
amount of information, solutions and a vast Reading Room.

I've
also received a number of emails from males angry because I said in the
aforementioned column that only sissy men will vote for Hillary. Guess
what? I stand by my statement that wimpy (weak) men will vote for Hillary
Clinton.