Add a request to become an administrator on an Uncyclomedia project. Mind: on an active community, follow the local procedures to request this. If there are no procedures, ask a local bureaucrat (if there is still no response after a week, request it here).

How can I became sysop again??? now the only sysop/bureaucrat on bodohpedia is Harry Potter, and he is not active anymore.--Adikhebat(talk) 10:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

I replied on your talk page. There is no one who can give you these permissions on Bodohpedia, unless our server host. Please wait a week and then I'll send an e-mail | CartoonistHenning(talk) 12:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks you very Much for reply !!, Is this mean i could get my sysop right again if Harry potter does not reply in week?? Btw, i have sent an e-mail to his Wikipedia account about this too.But still no reply from him. --Adikhebat(talk) 12:45, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes sure, if he doesn't reply in a week, I will send an e-mail to our server host to give you these permissions back | CartoonistHenning(talk) 20:20, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

How much time needed for our host server to reply this? --Adikhebat(talk) 13:02, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

I am aware that, unfortunately, CartoonistHenning is not bureaucrat there and why the request is being made directly to the owner of the site server. We are sending your request urgently. Rhubella Marie,the rat sockpreppie2,341preppiedits 15:07, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

We're sorry for this. We hope he will give you the permissions very soon. I'm sure he will, but I can't promise anything | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | | 20:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

It's showing an user #2 'Adikhebat' as already op... am I missing something here? Which of these two is you:

UnCommons (that makes three subjects on this page!)

Hey CH,

I'm still making rounds on the Uncyc/Illogic projects a few times a day most days, and I have at least minimal keys everywhere except UnCommons. How 'bout some rollback? :) ~ The Bard of UnMeta 15:34, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Formal request for my sysop rights to be reinstated here

I'd just like to make a quick formal request to have my sysop rights reinstated on this wiki. In 2008 when they were removed D.G. Neree stated that "if [I] intend to again become active here, [I] can place a request for admin rights on the appropriate request page." So this is me, placing a request. -- Sir Zombiebaron(talk) 16:33, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

And what's your motivation to become a bureaucrat again? What do you want to do with your bureaucrat permissions? Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | | 20:02, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

You did not stutter, but the question is: why do you want the status back? Have you any intentions to further the means of uncyclomedia, that is, being a central point for the different languages or is it just a matter of status? I mean, if your goal is towards a mutual agreement between the ***colpedia's, why are most of the users and admins of the Dutch Oncyclopedia Neerlandica banned from Uncyclopedia? There is reason to suspect that you have personal reasons to have this status back, other than seeing a uniting of the ***pedia's. D. G. Neree(talk) 20:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I have no idea why Dutch users have been banned from the English Uncyclopedia. If you can link me to some ban logs, perhaps I can shed some light on it. I am just one of several admins on the English site. I would like my sysop permissions back on UnMeta so that I can help clean up the site and get it ready to be a smoothly functioning hub for users of all languages to gather and discuss their projects. -- Sir Zombiebaron(talk) 20:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Maybe if the bans on the dutch users on Uncyclopediia, including me, would be lifted, and the agreement would be instated that we all work for the same cause, namely the furtherisation of the true nonsense and the eternal battle against wikipdia the disgusting fact-sites that cloud our senses, then there wouldn't be a problem at all in the first place. D. G. Neree(talk) 20:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

That has nothing to do with this and you know it. The users have been banned for their own actions on another wiki; if you feel the bans should be lifted on this other wiki, have the users contact those who implemented them, or should they be inactive, the current administration. ~20:40, 1 December 2011

As I have already said, I would like my sysop status back so that I can help clean up this wiki to make it a smoothly running hub for users of all languages to gather and discuss their respective projects. I invite all the other admins to monitor my actions closely after I get my status back to make sure my actions are not motivated by petty grudges. -- Sir Zombiebaron(talk) 20:53, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I have tried to connect to the IRC-channel, but i am blocked there too. I wonder if it has to do with me protesting against the pre-juvenile filth that is regarded as appropriate there. As I said, mister Zombiebaron, maybe you could put your money where your mouth is and help clean up this mess by restoring the relations between the different languages in casu the Dutch site. You could contact your affiliates on Uncyc and see if you could drown their personal grudges with some form of uncummon sense and the problem would be solved in no time and Happyland would be instated in no time. D. G. Neree(talk) 21:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

We were having a conversation about this on IRC, but in the traditional style of uncyclopedia, i was blocked from the channel. This proves in my view, that this application of Zombiebaron is nothing other than a political move ti regain his staus and has nothing to do with reconciliating the different ***pedia's. So my question is again: Why does zombiebaron want sysopstatus again after 3 years? Is it to bring together the different pedia's or just a matter of peronal status and the dominion of wikia over the free ***pedia's? This habit of banning everyone who's opinions arenn't liked is a very bad indication. D. G. Neree(talk) 00:18, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

With all due respect, you were and are being an arse. He has explained himself multiple times, whereas your repeated incivility, personal attacks on other users, telling me to go fuck myself and calling TKF 'fuckfeck', that is not the sort of behaviour that should be condoned out of anyone, regardless of their position here or elsewhere. Nor have you actually been recently active on the wikis you claimed to represent, so I do not understand why you feel so strongly about this, but regardless, CartoonistHenning is willing to consider the concerns you have brought up. So please, there is no need for this drama to continue, here nor on IRC. ~01:06, 2 December 2011

If a person acts like a boring fuck, i will claim the right to call him that. What are you, some kind of little kid that decides what can be said? I have been very civil in my suggestions, but when someone starts to take me for a sucker it just shows what a pitiful dumb ass he is himself. So don't put your infantile morals on me. If you silence an opponent you show that you just have no arguments yourself. The qustion remains: why do you want sysopstatus here, besides having the power to block people whose opinions you don't like? D. G. Neree(talk) 01:26, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

you are acting purposely like a drama queen I have never told you to go fuck yourself, instead i told zombiebaron that i respect him for his status on Uncyclopedia. And don't give me horseshit about 'other users'. there were only five people there and i only talked to zombiebaron until you started acting like a prick, followed by this guy Feck, who you refer to as TKF, which is just an other way of spelling fuck, so calling him fuckfeck is nothing more than honoring his own sense of pre-juvenile humor. D. G. Neree(talk) 04:21, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

I don't really want to continue this drama any further, but since I kept logs of our discussion on IRC today, I thought I should post a small relevant portion of it here. In case you've forgotten, this is when you told Lyrithya to go fuck herself:

Lyrithya: DGNeree: If you were not on UnMeta due to a dislike of unpleasant relations, then please do not promote unpleasant relations. Give people the benefit of the doubt. Be civil. Give peace a chance. [5:09pm]

Lyrithya: And various other cliches. [5:09pm]

DGNeree: Lyrithya: why don't jou go fuck yourself? [5:11pm]

DGNeree: to stay in the cliché mode [5:12pm]

I hope this helps clear up that point of this discussion. -- Sir Zombiebaron(talk) 04:52, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Maybe you could post the whole conversation and so show that I was talking to Zombiebaron to try and get our problems out of the way, when you kept interfering and didn't answer when I asked who you are and what you wanted, to which you didn't care to respond. But I'll tell you another thing:

I don't care what you do. The fun of editing for these sites has long gone sour already and the fact that I am still banned after all these years on Uncyclopedia and on the IRC channel and now this childish banning on the Unmeta channel has led me to conclude that i don't want anything more to do with the constant fighting and adolescent games that are played when people think they can achieve power by this and become admin by setting up people against each other. Worrying about good relations and trying to make something of the intercyclopedian relations is again ruining my appetite, so I'm resigning as admin here and will only do what de ***pedia's are meant for and I'll only do that on Oncyclopedia Neerlandica, namely writing and editing funny articles. So you figure it out and do what you like. I'm gone here and will stick to writing on my weblogs and the occasional article on Oncyclopedia. Good luck with your enormous motivation to make something of this site and your plans to unite the different languages. I'm off. Bye bye. D. G. Neree(talk) 11:14, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the WP:DIVA post. The logs are here. ~07:45, 3 December 2011

I also don't see valid reasons for NOT giving the rights at this moment. The "I'm banned on your home ***clopedia and you have to fix that" is not a valid argument. However, trust is something to treat carefully, broken trust is not easy to glue and usually I just trow it away when it's broken... Wkr, Alzheimlich(talk) 22:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

I am here to request admin rights for the user Lolish in Neciclopedia (Moldovan Uncyclopedia, old Uichipedia). I don't have bureacrat rights to make it and he has demonstrated a lot of interest by the wiki and this way, he can to conservate some good edits to develop the wiki created by me, to protect the wiki and, maybe, to help to grow up the wiki. :D vu'wI’RENAN333contributions 00:36, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Of course he can, but I'm not privileged to give anyone of you these rights. I requested this with all the 3 bureacrats in April this year and none of them has answered me since then. I must direct you to Carlb, because I can't do much | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | | 00:15, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

I would like to become an administrator on these two tiny wikis so I can fix them up better. They both get spam now and then so I would like to help take care of spam pages and spammers, and I would like to translate the user interface of Frithchiclipéid since so much of it is in English.

I do not know very much Irish at the moment, but I could easily copy over the necessary user interface text from Irish Wikipedia, and furthermore I have enough of a passive grasp that I can tell fairly easily if a given Irish-speaking user is trying to help or hurt the wiki. This information, I believe, is crucial to deciding whether to block a user, and the current sysops don't have that (they know no Irish at all).

On the other hand, I do know French quite well and fluent French speakers seem to be needed over at Logimalpédie, as well as people willing to clear out the spam.

It is getting spam. One account was created today and immediately created a junk user page; I expect more will pop in. The spam filters are too weak or something. I have globally blocked a few IPs from cy: (only wiki I can access Special:GlobalBlock from) but I don't know which IPs exactly to block when the spammers have accounts as they do on Scotypedia. There are also several spam pages that need to be deleted, I think.

I don't really know Scots but I am able to make a few minor fixes here and there to articles. I have corrected bits of one or two. And of course I can understand the written language quite well (as it is close to English). Llwyar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 15:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Again, spam. There is so much of it, and I don't think it's going to end for good any time soon. The flood of spam has been slow but steady. No real users have been there since Rhubella Marie did some admin work on 4 June, and things were pretty dusty even before then. I think it's been a year or more since the wiki was really active. I have asked Frosty and Teles if they would delete the spam and block the spammers but that was yesterday, and they haven't been on for months. I just think it would be more useful if I could clean up the mess myself. Llwyar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 18:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)