Access

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

The Journal of Coastal Research is the bimonthly publication of The Coastal Education and Research Foundation providing an international forum for the littoral sciences. This professional journal is dedicated to all aspects of integrated coastal research. The journal disseminates knowledge and understanding of coastal areas by promoting communication between specialists in geology, biology, geography, climate, littoral oceanography, hydrography, engineering, and remote sensing. The journal contains scholarly papers, review articles, book reviews, news, and provides additional special issues.

The "moving wall" represents the time period between the last issue
available in JSTOR and the most recently published issue of a journal.
Moving walls are generally represented in years. In rare instances, a
publisher has elected to have a "zero" moving wall, so their current
issues are available in JSTOR shortly after publication.
Note: In calculating the moving wall, the current year is not counted.
For example, if the current year is 2008 and a journal has a 5 year
moving wall, articles from the year 2002 are available.

Terms Related to the Moving Wall

Fixed walls: Journals with no new volumes being added to the archive.

Absorbed: Journals that are combined with another title.

Complete: Journals that are no longer published or that have been
combined with another title.

Content for this title is released as soon as the latest issues become available to JSTOR.

Abstract

The Generalized Model for Simulating Shoreline Change (GENESIS) (Hanson and Kraus, 1989) is designed to simulate the long-term shoreline changes at coastal engineering sites resulting from spatial and temporal differences in longshore sediment transport. GENESIS is used by the coastal engineering and planning communities for predicting the behavior of shorelines in response to coastal engineering and/or beach replenishment activities that may alter longshore transport. GENESIS is also used by some modelers to develop regional scale sediment budgets. We have evaluated the assumptions behind the GENESIS model in light of well understood nearshore, geologic and oceanographic phenomena. In most cases, the assumptions used in the model fail to be met or are so oversimplified that the model's effectiveness as a predictive tool is limited at best. In addition, the GENESIS Technical Reference (Hanson and Kraus, 1989) makes it clear that adequate data for running the model are seldom, if ever, available. Frequently, averaged values must be used, smoothing over great potential variability in data sets (waves, profile shape, etc.). When predictions are made, it is not possible to quantify the uncertainty in the assumptions or the error in the data, and thus it is not possible to quantify the uncertainty in predicted results. GENESIS does not provide the modeler with statistical answers. The best the modeler can do is to vary the input parameters to produce a range of possible scenarios. There is no way to objectively evaluate which scenario is the most reasonable. As the Technical Reference emphasizes, even with GENESIS the user must still constantly rely on his or her own technical expertise. All of this uncertainty makes GENESIS, at best, a qualitative, not quantitative model, and at worst a model that, after a certain amount of assuming and adjusting input parameters, produces a result that the coastal “expert” employing its services expected�a way of backing up one's judgment with what appear to be real numbers. We believe that future modeling efforts need to focus on statistical models where each parameter input into the model is accompanied by probabilities of its accuracy and predictive capabilities, producing probabilistic results.