Facing the mandate of this election..... or blaming the loss on poor wording!

The hard to take reality for most on this forum is accepting that the countries voters said in a clear and resounding way, "No more Republican obstructionism! Compromise.... or get voted out of office!" They are tired of the angry, biased attacks on Obama based in partisan negativity putting party before country! Most voters feel that although the economy is not rebounding as fast as we all would like, they trust Obama. They were also frightened by Romney's unwillingness to stand firmly for any position, or to be relied on to tell the truth under pressure! They also will not stand for Romney and his supporters disrespecting the 47%, Latinos and other minorities as simply "detriments" to our country, instead of as a needed resource for our labor market! Slicker, more polished wording will not easily erase what words minorities heard they know came from Romney's heart!

Those that can't accept this reality and MUST continue to angrily attack Obama on every issue rather than to cooperate with his efforts to improve this country will become increasingly irrelevant and therefore be passed by as negative whiners that have no positive benefit to our society!

America is changing! It will not look the same! As a White Grandfather, I attend Hispanic Fiesta Birthday Parties! I could have either embrace it, or become sour that the world changes! I embraced it and I am so lucky that I did! I am now loved by a new family more than my White family ever loved me! The Elderly are still honored in their culture!

We all have that choice to make! That is whether accept the way the world changes and embrace and shape those changes into something better, or to whine and fight all change.... ignoring that history tells us that such resistance always fails! "It's better to be happy, than to be right!"

I don't believe they should. Used to be white landowners back when the country was founded. I think it should be taxpaying citizens or something to that effect. When you pay taxes you're less likely to vote your money away. You're going to vote for a more efficient gov't instead. Would also give incentive to work harder so you can vote and change things.

I'm sure some of the people on welfare voted Republican, are you sure you want to lose those votes as well?
Besides, I though the US was all about rights and freedom! Now you want to start taking rights away?

So the prolific breeders took the election from you huh? Let's analyze that and insert the group you left out. Obama's take of the breeder vote 24 black, 14 Latino, 4 Asian, and 2 Other. Where did the other 56% come from Kenya? Here I'll help you with that, 56% came from those white "breeders" born and raised in the USA. Yes all other breeder support may be shameful but what's really shameful and discouraging is the "white breeder" vote after all shouldn't they by the staunchest defenders of this country and its principles? Well apparently they are not and had they voted the other way we wouldn't have this pathetic scrawny socialist in the White House today. And by the way in case you didn't get passed the sixth grade Latino is not a race but rather a classification created by a White breeder for people whose native language is not English. Latino breakers are of Western European descent just like you guessed it white breeders and others are indigenous to Central, South & North America. Oh and in case you weren't watching on election night this election wasn't decided by Texas or Arizona "Latino breeder country" it was most likely decided by Ohio, "white breeder" country. Oh yeah and let's not forget the most important point of all Obama is half white breeder by your standards, his cabinet is nearly all white breeder, and the Main Street media which is nearly 100% white breeder made the election of this 100% loser of a president possible.

It's funny you mentioned the raceS of the president. I wonder why he chose to be identified as black? Wasn't he raised by his white mother and grandparents, after his black father went back to Kenya? Just curious...

He chose to identify himself as black because that was the only thing that really set him apart from Hillary and he was successfully able to split the democratic vote by getting 95% of black support. In the end despite many trying to blame results on ethnic identity, the reality is that this country has changed and not because of the way we look but rather the attitude of the people. Accepting and expecting government hand outs has become a way of life for too many. The current administration real accomplishment over the past four years has been to racially divide, class divide, and demonize anyone that disagrees with their socialist vision for this country.

He chose to identify himself as black because that was the only thing that really set him apart from Hillary and he was successfully able to split the democratic vote by getting 95% of black support. In the end despite many trying to blame results on ethnic identity, the reality is that this country has changed and not because of the way we look but rather the attitude of the people. Accepting and expecting government hand outs has become a way of life for too many. The current administration real accomplishment over the past four years has been to racially divide, class divide, and demonize anyone that disagrees with their socialist vision for this country.

Our New Republican approach will unfortunately be forced to be more inclusive of the demographic groups such as Latinos, and Blacks who are prolific breeders!

Another group to be feared as well is the unrealistic Liberals who support the needs of The Middle Class Workers as well as supporting Gays wanting the legal rights of marriage for themselves to create stable married familes for both straight and Gay!

Our New Republican Tactics require that our approach must appear concerned with their needs and rights regardless of our personal distain for these groups and our lack of character, morality and level of civilization! Since apparently we will not be able to "out breed" these lower classed people of color entering of society illegally we must be prepared to control them through the election process by whatever means necessary.

Quote:

Originally Posted by primalurges

So the prolific breeders took the election from you huh? Let's analyze that and insert the group you left out. Obama's take of the breeder vote 24 black, 14 Latino, 4 Asian, and 2 Other. Where did the other 56% come from Kenya? Here I'll help you with that, 56% came from those white "breeders" born and raised in the USA. Yes all other breeder support may be shameful but what's really shameful and discouraging is the "white breeder" vote after all shouldn't they by the staunchest defenders of this country and its principles? Well apparently they are not and had they voted the other way we wouldn't have this pathetic scrawny socialist in the White House today. And by the way in case you didn't get passed the sixth grade Latino is not a race but rather a classification created by a White breeder for people whose native language is not English. Latino breakers are of Western European descent just like you guessed it white breeders and others are indigenous to Central, South & North America. Oh and in case you weren't watching on election night this election wasn't decided by Texas or Arizona "Latino breeder country" it was most likely decided by Ohio, "white breeder" country. Oh yeah and let's not forget the most important point of all Obama is half white breeder by your standards, his cabinet is nearly all white breeder, and the Main Street media which is nearly 100% white breeder made the election of this 100% loser of a president possible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayandsam09

It's funny you mentioned the raceS of the president. I wonder why he chose to be identified as black? Wasn't he raised by his white mother and grandparents, after his black father went back to Kenya? Just curious...

@ jayandsam09 - I think he missed that Opinyawn is a staunch Obama supporter and that his post was sarcasm. It could happen to anyone trying to get a handle on this crazy thread.

This about says it all. I miss listening to Paul Harvey.
This was done 47 years ago and look what we have now.
Paul Harvey was a very perceptive person and one who seemed to have a handle on how things were progressing in a very non-productive and negative way.
This was 47 years ago. April 3, 1965. An amazing prediction.
Do you remember the famous ABC radio commentator Paul Harvey?
Millions of Americans listened to his programs which were broadcast over 1,200 radio stations nationwide. When you listen to this, remember the commentary was broadcast 47 years ago on April 3, 1965.
It's short...less than three minutes. You will be amazed.