It wasn't the most polished debate I have seen - there was no fancy lighting or staging, and the opening statements did not happen until after the first question. But polish is not as important as substance. It was a great opportunity to see four presidential candidates, who have been largely ignored by the media, share their stance on some important issues.

A Few Notable Debate Quotes:
"What we have seen through the Bush years, and now Obama, has been absolutely subversive and anti-American. There's been no more anti-American act in our history than the NDAA. And in 2009, President Obama asked for the power to indefinitely detain people without charges, without trial, without legal assistance and without the right of habeas corpus. We are on the road to totalitarianism and that's not an exaggeration." - Rocky Anderson

"If we don't adopt term limits, you will always have a Congress that is always worried about the next election instead of what's best for the country," - Virgil Goode

"My concern is that even with term limits, unfortunately corporations and big money can still buy what they want, and are still buying our candidates...I want to pass the amendment that will clarify that money is not speech and corporations are not people." - Jill Stein

That last quote from Gary Johnson sums up why I think it is important to vote your conscience. When I experienced political exhaustion and took a break from following politics in August, I was frustrated. The break was a good thing, but the frustration came back as I returned to my regular political involvement a few weeks later, and only increased as I watched each presidential debate.

Watching these third party candidates last night reinvigorated me. It was wonderful to see them talk about subjects that have been largely ignored (NDAA, anyone?) by the media and the two main presidential candidates.

If you are happy with one of the two main presidential choices, I encourage you to vote for that candidate. If you are unhappy with the two main presidential choices, and you feel that neither one represents you, but you refuse to vote for a third party candidate who stands for the things that are important to you, you are a part of the problem. If you don't vote for someone because they can't win, then you never allow that person a chance to win.

The important thing is to vote for the candidate who best represents you, and the candidate you would like to see as president.

If you aren't sure where these third party candidates stand, please watch the debate video linked above. You can also check out iSideWith.com, and take the quiz to see which of the six candidates you most line up with on the issues that are important to you.

You get one vote.
Please don't waste it on a candidate you don't really believe in.

I've been voting 3rd party the last two elections, and I will again this election. Gary Johnson is my candidate. I refuse to place my vote for a person who has the potential to win, but doesn't support my views.

Unfortunately the major news networks just refused to cover it. It was publicized online quite a bit, but if you weren't actively looking for it, or following those candidates, it would have been easy to miss. Thankfully C-SPAN did cover it, which afforded it a larger audience.

Wow, Tracie; you really got me going--I went to the ISideWith site and ended up matching slightly more with a third-party candidate than with one of the two leaders. Interesting. This is a great, informative post. Thanks.