Look away Ruez and Shepard, what you are about to see is Halloween child abuse. This poor dad made his infant son carry him across the backyward. Just, sick very sick. Not to be laughed at in the slighest. What sick person makes a custome of his infant son carrying his dad around. Is he a pack mule or something? Just sickening.

So at some point, there was a child that voluntary sucked his priests dick, just like there were Arabs that chose to be murderous terrorists and Asian women that chose to be submissive whores.

Brenda wrote:

Ok, got it.

That costume of that child is just as funny as it would be for you to dress up as a 9/11 victim or soldier killed in combat.

If that is how you justify offensive costumes so be it.

Now, not every black man would find the above picture offensive but I can understand why they could be and empathise with that.

I'm sure you can understand how this could offend a black person....

....A guy in black face being led around with a string by another dude dressed up as a KKK memeber, they won first prize btw. I suppose the black person in the bar that left when he saw that should just suck it up.

Last edited by Guy_Fawkes on Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

Brenda
CKA Uber

Posts: 51048

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:06 am

Yeah, that is very offensive. Did i ever say it was not?YOU claim you find offensive costume not offensive. That's troubling...

r_p
Junior Member

Posts: 97

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:09 am

i think this would be a good time to remind everyone that not every Japanese man is a goddam ninja, either. Some of them are sushi chefs and others are just plain old samurais.

Guy_Fawkes
CKA Super Elite

Posts: 5312

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:09 am

Roe wrote:

Right......as this can be as well.

If you have a point somewhere I'm not seeing it....

Brenda
CKA Uber

Posts: 51048

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:10 am

Roe wrote:

This one is pretty funny.......

I dunno Roe, but you just said you found it funny, and did not understand why people found this offensive. Now you are called on your bullshit, you find it offensive too, all of a sudden?

If you stand for nothing, you fall for anything. Just sayin.

Brenda
CKA Uber

Posts: 51048

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:11 am

Roe wrote:

Brenda wrote:

Yeah, that is very offensive. Did i ever say it was not?YOU claim you find offensive costume not offensive. That's troubling...

Nope....I said it was offensive.

In the shoes of an Asian I might find the Geisha offensive....and I understand why.

You said it was FUNNY.

Bacardi4206
CKA Elite

Posts: 4144

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:12 am

Roe wrote:

Right......as this can be as well.

Not really seeing a point in the midst of that?

Guy_Fawkes
CKA Super Elite

Posts: 5312

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:13 am

I agree, he started off saying a costume of someone getting their cock sucked by a toddler was funny. Then showed us a list of what he found offensive. Im lost as well.

Zipperfish
CKA Uber

Posts: 19590

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:21 am

Roe wrote:

Nope, I'm glad they were offended, the picture is offensive.

So then you are claiming a right to offend, but saying that others shouldn't have that right.

You just painted yourself into a logical corner. Check and mate, my friend. In two moves, no less. Best thing you can do now is humbly acknowledge your defeat and praise my victory--though don't make it too effusive or it sounds fake, you know what I mean--and then pick up your teeth and sneak off.

PublicAnimalNo9
CKA Uber

Posts: 12890

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:27 am

Roe wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

You think a child performing sexual acts on an adult is funny?

It's about as funny as depicting an arab as a murderous terrorist or depicting an Asian as a submissive whore, or applying black face to depict a black person or depicting a mexican as a donkey riding stereotype with a big hat and moutache.

Why not a priest as a pediphile?

Is it because that offends you?

Guess what....this offends me....

Why? It's pretty obvious these guys are actually FANS of P.K. Subban.

RUEZ
CKA Uber

Posts: 15215

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:36 am

Bacardi4206 wrote:

Look away Ruez and Shepard, what you are about to see is Halloween child abuse. This poor dad made his infant son carry him across the backyward. Just, sick very sick. Not to be laughed at in the slighest. What sick person makes a custome of his infant son carrying his dad around. Is he a pack mule or something? Just sickening.

Look away Ruez and Shepard, what you are about to see is Halloween child abuse. This poor dad made his infant son carry him across the backyward. Just, sick very sick. Not to be laughed at in the slighest. What sick person makes a custome of his infant son carrying his dad around. Is he a pack mule or something? Just sickening.

My point is that you are looking way into it. That picture I don't find funny but I don't find it offensive either. How many priest jokes are there? Hundreds, 90% of them involve kid sex jokes. Those have been told for a awhile and nobody found those offensive. They were allowed because they were just words. Yet somehow some barrier has been crossed because the joke has gone from words to a holloween costume? That makes zero sense. The costume is meant to be as a joke, as was him uploading that picture. It's not about pedophilia, it's priest joke humor. You don't have to get the joke, you don't have to like the joke but calling it offensive is retarded. It's a joke of poor taste but still a joke.

RUEZ
CKA Uber

Posts: 15215

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:27 am

Bacardi4206 wrote:

It's a joke of poor taste but still a joke.

Is that your whole argument, that it was a joke? I can stipulate to that. I agree it was a joke. A distateful, disgusting, unfunny joke. But yes it was a joke.