George Bernard Shaw was very wary about allowing his movies to be
filmed. He had seen movies by other famous writers and dramatists
thoroughly rewritten for the screen, and thoroughly wrecked as a
result. So the greatest English speaking dramatist of the 20th Century
held off from any involvement with motion pictures into the 1930s. Then
he met Gabriel Pascal. Mr. Pascal was thoroughly honest. He admitted he
did not have a cent to his name, but he also admitted a desire to
produce all of Shaw's major plays as movies exactly as Shaw wanted them
shown. Shaw was impressed and made an agreement giving Pascal a
monopoly on all his plays for movie making. In return, Shaw was to be
involved in the productions.

It turned out to be a remarkably small but fruitful partnership. Of the
over fifty plays of Shaw's output (not to mention several novels), only
four were produced by Pascal. They are PYGMALION (1938), MAJOR BARBARA
(1940), CAESAR AND CLEOPATRA (1945), and ANDROCLES AND THE LION (1952).
They are all good films, and the first three have reason to be
considered great. Shaw died in 1950, so he was not there to see (after
Pascal's death) the decline in standards of films based on his plays -
such as Otto Preminger's brave attempt at ST. JOAN, and the wretched
THE MILLIONAIRESS with Peter Sellers and Sophia Loren.

PYGMALION was a good choice for the first of the series, probably as it
was the most popular comedy by Shaw. It was also one of the most
controversial plays because of the problem that bedeviled the original
production of 1914 and has effected it ever since: how is it supposed
to end? Will Higgins and Eliza put aside their differences and admit
they love each other and come together at the end?

Shaw clearly felt that Pygmalion Higgins and Galatea Doolittle were
doomed not to end in an embrace. He wanted the audience to be left
thinking of Eliza as one of the 20th Century's "New Women", who is
independent and strong, not just a piece of weak clay to be kneaded by
an artistic and overpowering male ego. In the dialog (which he uses in
the play and in the movie script) Shaw insisted that Eliza favors
Freddy Eynesford-Hill over Higgins because Freddy is a weakling. All
her life she has been dominated by strong men (first her father Alfred,
then Higgins, and (although he is kinder) Col. Pickering). Freddy is
the first one to show his need for guidance and help - he is shown at
the beginning of the play as little better than a servant for his
mother and sister, getting them a cab in the rain.

But Shaw did not have an easy time with this view. The play was
produced by Sir Herbert Beerbohm Tree, one of England's leading stars
of the Edwardian and Georgian stage (he was brother of critic and
writer Sir Max Beerbohm, and his son David Tree plays Freddy in this
film version). Beerbohm Tree felt that there was a real romance between
Higgins and Doolittle, and insisted on playing it like that, to the
point of throwing a bouquet of flowers to Eliza as she is leaving. Shaw
was furious at this, and wrote a seven page afterword which
(mercifully) is never read at productions. I saw Peter O'Toole as
Higgins in 1988, with Amanda Plummer as Eliza, Lionel Jeffries as
Pickering, and the late Sir John Mills as Alfred Doolittle, and the
play ended on the right note of uncertainty wanted. It did not have a
thin, bearded actor as Shaw coming out to read the afterward.

In this afterward, Shaw said that Eliza learns from the brutal Higgins
he is a confirmed bachelor devoted to his mother (an interesting
psychological point there that another play could have been built
from). She does marry Freddy, and (as Higgins had sneered) things are
tough - though not due to Freddy being unfaithful but that he is not
very sharp. But Col. Pickering helps them set up a florist business,
and after awhile it prospers. Clara Eynesford-Hill (whose character is
barely developed in the play or on the screen) does become a friend of
the socialist and novelist H.G.Wells. Alfred Doolittle, after getting
speech lessons from Higgins, becomes a popular speaker and writer on
social issues. As you can see, Shaw's anger got the better of him.

Shaw was convinced by Pascal (for business reasons) to soften the
conclusion, by showing Eliza fleeing Higgins in Freddy's car, Higgins
walking alone through London to his home, slamming the door of his
study, causing the phonograph to go on, playing a record of Eliza's old
voice talking. As he sits with head in his hands, Eliza shows up at the
door, turns off the machine, and starts talking as on the record. But
Higgins realizes it is her, although he does not turn around. He sits
back with a happy, if smug expression on his face, pulls his hat down
over his eyes, and says (shot from his back to Eliza), "Where the devil
are my slippers, Eliza?" It is suggestive of a meeting of two souls,
but it leaves it still in the air. It is superior to that idiotic
afterward.

George Bernard Shaw won his only Oscar for a screenplay for PYGMALION.
It is a brilliant play and script, given top notched direction by
Anthony Asquith and Leslie Howard, with Howard giving one of his three
top performances in it as Higgins - ably matched by Wendy Hiller as
Eliza and Wilfred Lawson as Doolittle. And it's conclusion was so good,
it was kept by Learner and Lowe for MY FAIR LADY on stage and screen.

Related Links

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Edit page' button will take you through a step-by-step process.