Economics book reviews | LSE Review of Books

Business & Economics Book Reviews | Kirkus Reviews

When you are reviewing a book written by an economist, then you must submerge yourself into the field of economics. The real truth is that you cannot effectively review books by economists if you are not one. So, economist book reviews should be done by an economist, so as to bring out the rudiments of the text and have a critical evaluation of the arguments made in the work. It is good to tell you that it is not easy to come up with a good book review, not to talk about the very detailed and rigorous field of economics. Whenever you set out to do economic book reviews, you should always bear it in mind that you are not just rushing through dissertation chapters in a casual read. Instead, you are saddled with a very substantial responsibility. Now, in most cases, the book review you put out may be the only place the reader will get information about the book. Because of this, you have to do well to balance things out and present the most important points of the economist’s book according to the different . So, your main work is to present the writer’s argument in a very fair manner and at the same time give your own opinion about the book, backing same with evidence. Now, just like every other book review, the reviewer who sets out to use the book review as an excuse to attack or defend a policy set of ideas or the author is actually not getting it right. What you need to do is to accept or reject the arguments or information offered by the author. In some other cases, you may encounter people trying to present the entire major arguments presented by the author in the book. When you have this mindset, then you will not succeed in the economist book reviews because it is practically impossible to accommodate all the arguments made by a writer in a book review. You are only advised to offer a glimpse of the substance of the book or the scent of the arguments, picking the most important and most relevant ones.

The economist book reviews are not exercises where you go ahead to demolish or explain the author. Now, the service is not really about you. Just like when you , you are doing it for the reader. So, you need to give basic information about the economist's book. The information includes who the book was written for and how accessible the language is. You should also try to tell the reader if the economist book is the type that should be read cover to cover whenever he needs to read it or whether it is the type of book that should only be consulted from time to time. The economist book reviews must also explain to the reader the kind of debates inside the book. You have to remember that you should do the review with a particular tone and style just as you do when you write the . Now, one cardinal point is that you must never end the book review with the saying that you think you agree or don't agree with the thesis and argument of the author. The ideal ending for a good book review in the economic world should assert whether you have agreed with the author's thesis or not. It should be very assertive, and you have to take a position or a very vivid and glaring opinion. We will help you with best book reviews in the economics world. If your economist book reviews are centered on the American government policies, then our will take care of it and offer you the best reviews.

In the age of social media, you have more options than writing a letter to the editor (although I’d still recommend doing so, just to make sure that they get the message), and thanks to this fact, the #economistbookreviews hashtag was born. On Twitter, it accompanied imagined book reviews written with The Economist’s ruthlessly amoral sensibilities: