Will CPL form propel West Indies to batter Bangladesh?

Earl Best examines current CPL form and looks at the implications for the West Indies’ imminent home series:

It’s hard to say today just which team will emerge victorious in the 2014 Limacol Caribbean Premier League. Any one of the top three can still do it. Despite one or two narrow defeats, the Guyana Amazon Warriors (GAW), well led by the West Indies Test captain, are down but emphatically not out.

Defending champions the Jamaica Tallawahs (JT), a very hard nut to crack, have lost their invincible aura, going under to the Trinidad and Tobago Red Steel (TTRS) at the Oval in their away fixture and needing a once-in-a-blue-moon innings to get the better of the Warriors a week later.

And after the unseemly, public, yard fowl squabbling between two ministers of government over whether or not the franchise should be allowed to carry the country’s name, the TTRS more than most have something to prove.

What we can say with much more assurance at this stage, though, is that, caeteris paribus, when Bangladesh arrive in the Caribbean for their 2-Test, 3-ODI and 1-T20 series which begins at the National Cricket Stadium in Grenada on August 20, they will have no chance against the regional teams.

However, one has to ask whether all the caterers will in fact be on the Paris bus. Will all things indeed be equal? Will the energy and the enthusiasm, the drive and the commitment, the form and the class we are currently seeing from the CPL rank and file also be on display when 11 of the home players are selected to don the maroon cap and be the standard-bearers for the entire region?

It is a question that bears close examination at this stage because in the answer we may find important keys to understanding why WI continue to wallow in the backwaters of the world game at the highest level. It is, I submit, the question that Tony Cozier has tangentially tackled in his column headlined “Coaching, the CPL and West Indies culture” in the Sunday Express of August 3.

The major difference between the CPL and the West Indies teams can be summed up in two words: Ottis Gibson.

In responding to my last piece on Denesh Ramdin, one knowledgeable and insightful commentator noted that current West Indies manager Richie Richardson is the first holder of that lofty position who “reports to the coach.” It’s a safe bet that it was not the manager who requested that arrangement.

Photo: West Indies coach Ottis Gibson.

But frankly I don’t blame Gibson; if I were in his situation and had his competence and qualifications (as distinct from certification!), I too would want to be calling the shots. How else could I realistically expect to keep my job?

Let me hark back once again to the instructive July 24 GAW vs TTRS game at the Queen’s Park Oval which the home side won thanks to a last-ball six. You had to notice the compassionate reception Curtly Ambrose, the GAW co-coach, gave Ronsford Beaton after Darren Bravo clobbered him over mid-on to seal the win.

And two days later in Kensington Oval, when the young man managed to pull the chataignes out of the chulha with a miserly final over in the game against the BT, Ambrose embraced him so passionately that you wondered whether he had lost it.

It’s probably an unfair question but I think it’s a relevant one: Anyone remembers ever seeing anything similar from Gibson? Not that he loves West Indies less, one suspects…

Of interest too is the fact that, despite the Thursday night setback, with only nine runs needed and century-maker Dwayne Smith still at the crease, Ramdin opted to entrust the responsibility of the last over to Beaton again. The 21-year-old Guyanese quickie stepped up and delivered on the night so his skipper emerged smelling of roses.

Almost a week later at Sabina, up against the GAW in a decisive encounter, the JT got to 138 for 4 in reply to 137 for 6 courtesy of Russell’s last-ball six, which followed a four off the penultimate ball.

…with 55 needed off 24, (…) Russell carted Ronsford Beaton for 6, 6 and 4 off the first three balls to keep the Tallawahs in the hunt for an unlikely win. They still needed 24 off nine balls when Russell struck a four and a six off Krishmar Santokie to set up the final-over theatrics.

Beaton (…) was passed over this time around by Amazon Warriors captain Denesh Ramdin and instead (Jimmy) Neesham was tasked with defending 13 off the last six balls. Only one run was conceded off the first three balls but a bouncer to Owais Shah on the fourth ball was out of the batsman’s reach and crucially signalled a wide. Shah then took a single off the fourth legal delivery to set up Russell’s heroic ending.

So when one thinks of what might have occurred in Bridgetown if the flailing Jonathan Carter—or more likely the rampaging Smith—had smashed Beaton’s last ball over the ropes to give the Tridents victory, one understands why some baulk at the suggestion to promote Ramdin to West Indies captain (i.e. in all three formats).

Would not the skipper and his bowler have had their confidence completely shattered, perhaps irreparably so, by a second successive last-ball defeat in such circumstances?

Another significant element that is going to be different once the CPL is over is that there will be no foreign pros to call on. It would be fair to say, however, that this year’s competition has not so far been dominated by the foreigners.

The Pakistanis Shoaib Malik (313 in 7 inns) and Sohail Tanvir (163 & 6/152 in 7) and New Zealand’s Martin Guptill (129 in 6) have earned honourable mention more than once, the first two for contributions with bat and ball, the last more for his outstanding performance in the field than at the crease. The TTRS’ Kevin O’Brien (209 in 6 inns & 6 wkts for 42runs in 3 inns) has also produced good performances with bat and ball.

However, the most outstanding performers have been many of the players vying for places on the side to face the Bangladeshis. Chris Gayle (339 in 7 inns), Lendl Simmons (258 in 7), Smith (257 in 7), Evin Lewis (251 in 5), Marlon Samuels (182 in 6), Ramdin (178 in 6) and DM Bravo (154 in 5) have caught the eye.

Unsurprisingly, with the ball Sunil Narine (5/61 at 3.81 rpo), and Samuel Badree (9/114 at 4.38 rpo) have been the standouts. Krishmar Santokie (10/205 in 7 inns) and Jerome Taylor (11/185 in 7) have also been notable if not quite impressive and Beaton (7/185 in 7) has also called attention to himself.

There may still be loud second-half overtures from Johnson Charles (117 in 6) or Keiron Pollard (103 in 7), Andre Fletcher (88 in 6) or Darren Sammy, Ravi Rampaul (16/201 in 7) or Kevon Cooper (10/179 in 7inns), Fidel Edwards (6/160 in 6) or Sheldon Cottrell (6/12 in 6 inns at 5.95 rpo), Jason Holder (2/63 in 7) or Russell (115/6 & 8/125 in 6) or Verasammy Permaul (4/155 in 7) or Sulieman Benn (3/177 in 7 inns at 7.37 rpo), all of whom prior to the start of the CPL season may well have fancied their chances of being selected.

One supposes that Shannon Gabriel (3/20 in his only match) and Tino Best (3/109 in 4) would also have been seeing their names in lights.

So with two baker’s dozens applications to consider already, it is looking more and more as if the regional selectors are going to have an embarrassment of riches on their hands when it is time to decide on the West Indies 15. And then reduce that number to 11.

My hope is that they will not embarrass us all. On present form, the squads for the shorter formats with which the tour kicks off towards the end of the month select themselves; there is simply no place for current T20 captain Sammy who has conceded more runs with the ball (109) than he has managed to produce in six innings (88) and captured a solitary scalp into the bargain.

Badree, Smith, Santokie and Simmons will be hard-pressed to hold on to their places for the two Tests and Kraigg Brathwaite, who was so impressive against the Kiwis, should get the nod ahead of Lewis, who is still to convince many that he has the temperament required for success in the Test arena.

Photo: West Indies cricket stars Chris Gayle (right) and Dwayne Bravo are in the mood to party.

There is also Shivnarine Chanderpaul who, with 150 Tests under his belt, is still not ready to call it quits. Left to Coach Gibson, the Guyanese left-hander with the unorthodox stance will probably be passed over. Understandably. But my guess is that it won’t be because the selectors see and seize the chance to blood a few youngsters in a home series against relatively weak opposition.

Additionally, there is still the issue of horses for courses. And fitness. And form.

And this being the West Indies, we have to factor in the insular politics.

But let us wait then and see if Mr Ramdin will travel the controversy-free route preferred by his immediate successor or whether he will take a leaf out of the Brian Lara book and refuse to be dictated to by off-the-field interests.

My money is on the latter. And on a six-match whitewash, weather permitting, for the visitors from the sub-continent.

About Earl Best

Earl Best taught cricket, French, football and Spanish at QRC for many years and has written consistently for the Tapia and the Trinidad and Tobago Review since the 1970's.
He is also a former sports editor at the Trinidad Guardian and the Trinidad Express and is now a senior lecturer in Journalism at COSTAATT.

17 comments

I think the records (for all the cricket-playing countries) will show that the sides blessed with talent and technique win far more often than not; and conversely. Also, they will illustrate that it is not unusual for dominant teams to abruptly become whipping boys (under the SAME captain) when they lose two or three influential players. And, of course, we have the evidence of the WI experience: how many captains have we changed in recent times, and to what effect? Fact is, decisions on bowling changes, field-placings, declarations, etc., are largely communal anyway; and overall-performances depend profoundly on the quantum of quality in the team.

Arguably, this elevation of ‘the Captaincy Issue’ is an outdated holdover from the British (with their ‘royalty’ orientation); and, one suspects that: if the USA were ever to join the cricket world, they would probably appoint the 2 or 3 BEST players as co-captains!

Ha, that BANG series I will not be watching. Football season will be back. But whatever team they pick, should walk over BANG, I don’t expect any hiccups.

After that we have 6 tests in India/S Africa between October & Christmas, the world cup & 5 home tests ENG/AUS. That’s the serious stuff & after that we will know whether the windies are improving or not.

I am happy to read a forward thinking post that leverages out of our own CPL. I firmly believe that my selection is the team to beat on this type of surface. we must avenge our embarrassment to them. it is a combination of youth and experience. there are four or five competent wicket keepers in my team because it is crucial to hold catches especially in slips. the line up bats deep for an expected flat surface and the opponent’s spin attack. the youth would compensate for gayle’s and chander’s lack of movement in the field. Jordan is a wicket to wicket with pace. this is the best surface to win with youth and starts a good foundation for them. by 25 they should be breaking records. the captain can take the gloves of in any session and martial his troops even better as he would have less to think about and someone gets breakout experience.
I see this team getting or chasing 350 to 400 runs in an innings and defending this in the field. Games won in 4 days tops!

Wayne, I don’t think that there are any fundamental differences between your essential positions and mine except on the Sammy issue. If you’re making the point about the technical weakness of the West Indian players, how can you select Sammy who plays the same way no matter what the circumstances. “Vooper” is an unkind word but it is not, in my view, unjust to so describe Sammy. And I watch not just the CPL but ANY cricket that’s on TV.

And I did make the point – or try to – about the “insular politics” impinging on selection. But should it?
Prince Borde, Of course, Taylor gets in ahead of Rampaul but they’re both in my starting XI. But if the track favours spin, I’m going with Miller ahead of Rampaul and using Bravo as the second “quickie.” And the question is not what they will do but what they should do. That applies to both the Sammy issue and the three “openers” issue. What do you think they SHOULD do?

Sammy would do better in Pakistan, England and maybe India. Now at the end of his career 33, Bravo is a natural replacement. Playing him through in tests that he will not be effective will be a mistake.

I see Russell making 50 off 17 balls consistently with a high risk shots of getting out. when he goes in half our of batting, wouldn’t the opposition have half of a day extra time to make back the runs? And the same Russell will have to be bowling within 45 overs for that same half of a day to get them out? I see him working at Lords in a test as a no.10, maybe not as effective on a Bangladeshi wicket.

Evin to open, Smith at 3,Simmons 4,Polly5, Dwayne B 6,Pooran7,Sammy8,Holder9,Narine10,Badree11. the future is represented here, it is Bangladesh at home so blood Pooran and Evin , reward them and encourage them

Couple of things here:
First, re Ramdhin as Captain in all formats:
I like Denish and would accept him as skipper in any of the formats. But I think it is very debatable whether he is the ‘best’ choice in any of the formats. Moreover, I think that it does not really make a difference who is the Captain; and thus we should not make it an issue.

Further, there are other reasons for having separate Captains, beyond the issue of who is ‘most suitable’ for the Captaincy role. These include: overall quantum of individual Captain-stress; and the need to allow each player a possible window of respite in an environment of pervasive, insular player-tensions.

Secondly, I am not comfortable with any reliance on bat/bowl stats from the CPL. Having watched ALL the games completely, I find much of the batting, bowling and fielding to be of modest quality. Moreover, I think the WI players remain technically-weak; and consequently, will keep my fingers crossed even against Bangladesh

That said, I generally agree with the teams selected, except that Sammy will still be a starter on my T20 squad; and Lewis will open the batting even in the Test matches.

the beginning of your view is actually the answer for the last part of your view on technical correctness. We have players that are technically correct to play on different surfaces. Was Lara technically correct batsman? was walsh a technically correct fielder? Is Dwayne a technically correct all rounder? Does Chanderpaul have a technically correct stance? I know for a fact that he can give a technically correct interview and people hate on him for it! Are these guys slouches in world cricket? tell me what model of tele are you looking at and i’ll go out and buy it just to see your view. No disrespect, but are we crying down our own perhaps?

Good squad the only difference is taylor must be picked over rampaul. I doubt they will pick
3 openers in the same team. So Evan Lewis although warrant a pick. Might make way to fletcher or Sammy. Fletcher because he made runs vs New Zealand and Sammy because he’s the t20 captain

1 month agoby wired868Where allyuh?! W Connection and Club Atlético Pantoja engage in Caribbean Club Championship battle in front of a sprinkling of patrons at the Ato Boldon Stadium in Couva on 4 February 2018. Photo: Nicholas Bhajan/CA-Images/Wired868

3 weeks agoby wired868South Zone secretary and Point Fortin East Secondary teacher Essiel Seecharan makes a point during the SSFL’s first Stakeholders Forum at the National Cycling Centre in Couva on 24 February, 2018. Looking on (from left to right) are Norris Ferguson, Phillip Fraser, Gregory Wales, Gerald Elliot and Anthony Creed. Photo: Allan V Crane/CA-images/Wired868