When we moved from the Southwest US to the Midwest, I experienced some culture shock in the form of food. Craving Mexican food, we tried restaurant after restaurant. Nothing met our expectations; most of it seemed like ketchup with a little chili powder mixed in. Honestly, what self-respecting Mexican place offers a menu item called a “wet burrito”? Yet there it was in Michigan, all over the place. The idea that Taco Bell was true Mexican food…well, that just burned me like Mom’s huevos rancheros.

And the shock continued when entering the grocery store. Chili powder did have some ground-up chilies for color, but also a list of other spices tossed in, only diluting the lovely, smoky taste of pure chili powder. A search for corn tortillas showed me the disappointing nature of grocers in the Midwest: those crispy taco shells are the only things closely resembling corn tortillas, but there are no soft corn tortillas in many Midwestern grocery stores.

What does this have to do with fiction?

This has everything to do with the taste that one develops. Having grown up in the Southwest, eating typical New Mexican dishes, I developed a discriminating taste. Something less than that wonderful, pure red-chili flavor was disappointing, and not really what I wanted to settle for.

One can “develop taste” similarly with many other things: housing, fashion, music, or literature. If you have lived on a diet of junk food all along, you won’t know or appreciate gourmet food. When you partake of a steady diet of excellent literature, you are able to identify the characteristics of quality. And you will dislike literature of a lesser quality.

Which brings us to Christian fiction.

Most Christian fiction falls into two categories: Christian romance and Christian mystery/spiritual battles. Much of Christian romance is poorly written and follows a fairly predictable formula. They are not much better than Harlequin Romance books: they follow an impracticable romantic recipe that rarely changes.

When I was in junior high, a friend’s mom read many Harlequin Romances every week. Intrigued, I borrowed a few from her. It didn’t take very many books for me to find out that they were trash: very low quality writing, predictable formula, boring. I didn’t recognize it then, but the titillation of a Harlequin Romance causes the reader to fantasize, wish for a different or more exciting life, and eventually to become dissatisfied with her own life. In some cases, the titillation—the description of the love affair itself—is akin to soft porn. It becomes addicting.

I concluded, early in my young life, that the Harlequin novel was of poor substance, because I had been fed a steady diet of quality literature from my mother’s lap. She supplied us with much classical literature, curled up with us to read poetry, and took us to the theater (and opera) as much as she could. Thus from a young age I could distinguish between “trashy” novels and classical literature—just as I can between Taco Bell and true New Mexican food, or between McDonald’s and a good filet mignon.

Often, too, the characters are not at all realistically portrayed. Their dialogue is stilted and stiff, not at all the way you and I would normally speak (nor, I suspect, the way pioneers spoke to one another…). Men are strapping and strong, handsome and virile, perfect–without flaw (except the one bad guy…who’s really bad…and poorly portrayed). The women are flawed, weak, indecisive, abused, or neglected in the past.

They need rescuing. Yes, in fact, we all do (that is a great spiritual truth)! However, the unrealistic juxtaposition of these two character types is puzzling. Since the readers are women, are the main female characters portrayed this way so that the reader can project herself into that character? Does that enable the reader to fantasize herself in that role? This is just my guess.

However, contrast that aspect with great classical literature. Romance for romance (and I will argue that these are not “simple” romances, but let’s just say, for argument’s sake), Jane Austen’s novels portray weakness and flaws in every character, realistically. Women need rescuing at times, but at others, they are the ones whose brains are the only ones working for a time. Men are strong yet flawed, egotistical yet self-conscious. Austen’s stories are rich, beautifully written, timeless. I have yet to find those qualities in a Christian Romance.

Rarely do those novels ever resemble reality. If the effect of a Harlequin Romance is to draw the reader into soft porn, the Christian romance is a low-key version of the same. The result: increased dissatisfaction with one’s current life while daydreaming and fantasizing about the perfect romantic partner in some exotic, or pastoral, setting. (Just add a pastor.)

Just a sampling of bonneted beauties on the cover of some Christian Romance novels…

For some reason, many Christian romance novels feature pioneers or Amish women. Visiting a local library, we engaged in a totally unscientific survey: we pulled a cross-section of Christian novels off the shelf. We looked through 23 books and were astounded to find a whopping 8 bonneted beauties on the cover. Why? Perhaps because that time or place was supposed to be more simple, more romantic? I am still puzzling over that one. (If you have an idea, please chime in.)

If you have read my other blog about quality literature and read some of the suggested materials on discerning good reading material, you know that “good literature” can be Christian or secular. So can bad.

The quality of excellent literature constitutes how well the story is told—how well the picture is painted in the mind of the reader. Is the moral dilemma—the tension between good and evil—presented well? Does the book reward re-reading? Do the characters come to life? Is the vocabulary, and the writer’s voice, rich? Will the story stand the test of time, and will it make sense, will it ring true, four decades or a century from now? If you can answer yes to these questions, you may have a piece of quality literature in front of you.

Why do many Christian authors stop short of excellent literature? Your guess is as good as mine. Why do secular authors? Probably we’ll find the answer is the same for both. Danielle Steele writes countless secular romance novels, and she has done so for twenty or thirty years. They sell well. But like Harlequin Romances, Steele’s novels are not well-written. They are formulaic, predictable, simplistic, and they oftentimes don’t even bother with good grammar. (Yes, I read some. I picked them up to see what all the buzz was about. Frankly, I was more bothered that so many readers spend money on such poor writing, than that she writes them. She makes plenty of money, so her strategy works!)

Instead of settling for (or limiting themselves to) the majority of fiction labeled as Christian literature, parents should teach their children how to discern what is good about all literature. They should teach their children how to tell the difference, develop their palate for what is excellent.

Certainly some literature is to be avoided due to its content, its language, or its unnecessarily graphic depictions. Be willing to explain the criteria to your child and why certain books do not meet those criteria.

Here’s the challenge for Christian parents: explore your standards from a biblical worldview: watch the depiction of good and evil. Is it a battle? Does the moral tension reflect reality? Is good truly good, and is sin truly distasteful? Whether Christian or secular, does it gloss over the reality of evil and its consequences? Does moral tension drive the plot, or does the romantic, unrealistic quest for true love drive the story? Is immorality sugar-coated, underplayed, and simplistic, or is it real?

If up to this point you have limited yourself to Christian novels simply because you don’t have to do the work of discerning what’s good literature, step up to the challenge. Read the classics. Try some gourmet food instead of McDonald’s.

Next installment: My picks for excellent literature (you may be surprised!)

Disclaimer: I have not read any of these Christian romance novels mentioned, so I acknowledge my thoughts here are presumptive.

Perhaps the popularity of Amish/pioneer settings has to do with a perceived culture of chastity. Fiction set in modern day does not often assume that virginity is a desired state, therefore Christian writers (Christian romance writers especially) might feel the need to “make a case” for celibacy. Is placing a story within a setting where chastity is the norm the easier thing to do? The author and and reader could be using these settings to avoid an issue rather than discover some truth to take into the real world. I believe good authors of any genre write with strength and courage and give the same to their readers. In terms of Christian romance, I can understand an author’s desire to write a story and not a manifesto, but Christians were never called to live under a fort of blankets and tell each other ghost stories of a “simple life” until the Kingdom comes. Is “True Love Waits” really relevant to Christians today? Apparently not to these Christian romance authors, if we take them seriously.

We looked through 23 books and were astounded to find a whopping 8 bonneted beauties on the cover. Why? Perhaps because that time or place was supposed to be more simple, more romantic? I am still puzzling over that one. (If you have an idea, please chime in.)

You might want to look up a theological concept called “headship.” There’s something somewhere in the epistles of Paul that some conservatives interpret as saying women’s heads should be covered, while men’s should be uncovered.

I recently flipped through one of these (I don’t remember the author or title) and somewhere in the title page or foreword or thereabout was a note that all Bible quotes are from the King James Version, so it looks like there’s some overlap between this particular niche of the publishing industry and the “KJV-only” community.

I support the right of all viewpoints being expressed ~ even those I disagree with. So thank you for this past post.
As a reader of varied genres from biographies to anthologies to Bible commentary and fiction (secular and non secular), and an author, I disagree with your statement:
“If up to this point you have limited yourself to Christian novels simply because you don’t have to do the work of discerning what’s good literature, step up to the challenge.”

Up until the advent of small press and self publishing, Christian authors were limited to writing and releasing books under one far-reaching umbrella – the CBA ( Christian Booksellers Assn.) ~ now the ECPA (Evangelical Christian Publisher Association). Main distributors of Christian books would furnished stock to stores that *only* accepted CBA-approved (e.g., sanitized, formulaic and unrealistic outcomes) content. That is what the audiences of the 80’s, 90’s & mid-2000’s has access to buy and read. For some readers that is what they still prefer.
Now, there are other avenues to seek quality Christian fiction. That original reader population is ageing out. Readers in 2017 are looking for sweet, clean romance books and also titles which are theologically correct and engrossing. The term “edgy Christian fiction” has emerged.

So, in final response to your comment above: the industry itself dictated the content when you first posted. The tide of change is moving, but slowly. I suggest you take a look at non-ECPA Christian fiction outside of Harlequin and Bethany House, for example. I know of a hundred talented fiction authors who produce quality legitimate Christian fiction.
#FHLAuthor and #FGMNAuthorwill give you a start.

Rhetoric Text

You can now find Thoughts Clothed in Words, the second edition of our Biblical Worldview Rhetoric textbook, at amazon.com.

This textbook combines the previous edition of Rhetoric 1 and 2, adding new content. A separate collection of discourses studied in Rhetoric, titled The Art of Fitting Expression, will be available shortly. Also forthcoming: an enhanced teacher text containing quizzes, answers, worksheets, additional discussion questions, and a suggested time table for the course.

Please contact us for more information at howat.sk@gmail.com or howattp@gmail.com.