https://www.ureka.org/related/108165
https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/111051/make-money-irrelevant-26-billionaires-have-the-same-wealth-as-38-billion-other-peopleFri, 08 Nov 2019 21:22:44 +0000https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/111051/make-money-irrelevant-26-billionaires-have-the-same-wealth-as-38-billion-other-people
This new video is a follow up that covers the reality that 26 people have the same financial wealth as pretty much half the planet’s population and that we need to create ways to make money irrelevant. @dan, one of the inventors of Steem and EOS has a great phrase and aim ‘Make government irrelevant’ - I am saying to move on to applying this logic to money too.How can food freedom lead us to deep economic freedom? Can small changes made by each of us build up to massive changes that replace the old broken paradigm? Find out!Wishing you well,Ura SoulLINKS

https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/110852/%E2%80%98why-mainstream-forms-of-money-are-evil%E2%80%99-in-under-10-minuteshttps://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/20/business/oxfam-billionaires-davos/index.html #money #spirit #freedom]]>https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/108815/politics-is-futile-without-this-free-will-world-peaceTue, 16 Jul 2019 18:26:39 +0100https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/108815/politics-is-futile-without-this-free-will-world-peace
Politics is the art/science of governing – which itself is ‘holding control over a government’ - which is to ‘hold control over people’. This is inherently imbalanced, since it is always the case that governments use a monopoly on violence to overpower anyone who they effectively choose to. The degree to which they can do this depends on: 1. the degree to which the court/police/military systems are corrupted 2. the degree to which the average person goes along with it – whether consciously or otherwise. People support politics because they have been taught to believe that it is in their best interests to do so – sometimes because they will get beaten if they don’t support politics or for more positive reasons, such as that they think they can gain something through it. However, in almost all cases, nearly everyone loses valuable things as a result of politics and the things they think they gain could have been gained in other ways without losing out what they really need to be keeping. Both the points which define how much a political group can abuse others rely on: 1. deception 2. denials 3. manipulation 4. social engineering 5. hierarchy 6. heartlessness Either the politicians are using these to manipulate other people or the people are doing this to themselves and each other (consciously or unconsciously). The only way to have real balance – where balance is defined as ‘no person or thing is overpowering any other’ - we need to end these 6 dysfunctions. The result will be actual free will, which itself then leads to greater personal empowerment and peace. If we don’t create real peace then we are stuck in a power struggle forever – with constant casualties and no real progress. Do you really think ANY real progress has been made in human history? REALLY? We have more advanced technology than we did in the last few thousand years – but setting aside the high probability that lost civilisations advanced their technology even further and were then destroyed – is technology really a sign of progression? When that technology is fundamentally being used to kill, maim and manipulate (see: smartphone spying, drone warfare, nuclear weapons, covert black projects, microwave warfare and on and on) – we haven’t really made any progress from the days of cavemen figuring out how to throw heavier rocks at each other. The only real progress is one of real and felt balance. This requires an and to many features of society that we often take for granted and even think we cannot live without. What replaces them will be much better, provided we understand the full details and make the right decisions. The most fundamental of these is to set ‘respect for free will’ as the highest priority. If we respect each other’s free will, we aren’t overpowering anyone. The biggest challenge to this is that there many people who don’t care about others’ free will. However, if we do not give these people more power than they rightly have, then the problems can be resolved. Currently, we are typically giving such people a great deal of power – as can be seen via the recent case of Jeffrey Epstein. How would this actually play out? It’s up to YOU! It’s up to YOUR FREE WILL!]]>https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/110852/%E2%80%98why-mainstream-forms-of-money-are-evil%E2%80%99-in-under-10-minutesSat, 02 Nov 2019 14:02:46 +0000https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/110852/%E2%80%98why-mainstream-forms-of-money-are-evil%E2%80%99-in-under-10-minutes
Evil:a : morally reprehensible : wicked - an evil impulse b : arising from actual or imputed bad character or conductc : causing discomfort or repulsion d : disagreeable e : causing harm : pernicious Money:1 : something generally accepted as a medium of exchange, a measure of value, or a means of payment: such as a : officially coined or stamped metal currency b : money of account c : paper money

These definitions only take us so far into understanding the nature of the evil in money – we need to dig beneath the surface of both of these ideas to identify the evil that I want you to recognise with me.Evil seems simple enough – but it is to some extent subjective: what is evil to me might not be evil to you. What is less subjective, though, is our emotional responses that relate to survival and what we might call the pleasure/pain principle. While it might be true that some people are emotionally dysfunctional to the point of not feeling much at all – we all generally will feel the pain of being stabbed by a knife or more poignantly, the pain of being starving, homeless and likely ill as a result too. We will generally all also feel the pleasure of having our needs met and of feeling secure in life in general.‘Evil’ is defined by dictionaries as causing ‘discomfort, repulsion and harm’ and in our current society we are likely to experience these when lacking money for any significant length of time. A lack of money tends to mean that we are unable to buy food, clothing or find a place to sleep and so we suffer and may even die as a result. Some of us, though, might disagree that this is ‘Evil’ because there is no intention to cause someone to end up this way and some may even claim that any evil involved is the doing of the person who is actually poor and suffering – they have somehow brought about this suffering on themselves through poor choices and thus the evil is perhaps their own. What if it could be shown that there IS intention to cause such harm to people through the use of money? Would that then make the money itself evil?I will show you here that there IS an intent to cause harm that has been built-in to our money systems and that as a result, the causation of extreme suffering to people is intentionally unavoidable. I will also show that mathematically there is no possible other outcome than bankruptcy for a significant percentage of the population – as long as the money systems in use today continue to be used.The complexity of the financial systems has made understanding this information unnecessarily challenging for most of us for a long time, however, thanks to the internet and many researchers I will be able to summarise the logic of the situation relatively quickly:1. Wealth gap - The majority of the wealth of the planet (money, resources and property titles) is held by a small minority of the population, with most people having close to zero (or even less than zero due to debt). “The top 20% wealthiest households own over 93% of the stock” (source: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/composition-of-wealth/). This means that most people who are born, statistically, will have close to zero support other than what they might claim from governments or as a result of their parents working for a business run by one of the wealthier families.2. Government corruption – The situation is made worse by the reality that vast amounts of tax money is spent not on helping the human population, but on bailing out banks, paying for military/wars and is ‘lost’ in corrupt projects that aren’t properly overseen. For example – here’s a story from just a few days ago of how the US government has quietly given unstable banks $400 Billion without most people even noticing (source: https://fortune.com/2019/09/23/repo-market-big-deal-400-billion-bailout-unnerving/). The amount given to human services fluctuates but the general trend that sees much of the government’s tax money being syphoned back off to the wealthiest (who control the governments via their proxy politicians) is a virtually perpetual trend.These first two points set the scene for why so many are impoverished from the get-go and why no matter how much tax you seem to pay, the problems never get any better. Those who do not do enough research tend to assume that the problem is a fundamental lack of intelligence among the least wealthy. These commenters often fail to do the needed due diligence research to know what is really going on in the mathematics and policies in the world around them. When throwing judgement on others we must always look first at our own involvement in causing what we are pointing at in others.3. Monetary Fraud – Perhaps the most important point here to understand is that the entire foundation of the money creation process is fraudulent. Money is a token that is intended to represent the value of things in our world to make trade easier. In a perfect world we would only receive the tokens that roughly represent the sum of the value of our past actions to the human community and therefore our value in the community should be to some extent reflected by the amount of money we receive, spend and hold. This is part of why people often get so obsessed with money, since they falsely associate money with a sense of self worth.We generally understand that if someone can get ‘money for nothing’ then the entire system of valuation breaks down and everyone else’s money becomes devalued – making their life more difficult. Everyone has to work harder, for less, as long as someone is making ‘money out of thin air’. When people are caught ‘counterfeiting’ money, they are sent to jail – because we know that ‘money out of thin air’ is a huge problem. However, the MOST wealthy, via the banking system and the controlled governments, have been doing exactly this for decades in a way that most people don’t understand and that has been made ‘legal’. This is partly why the cost of living seems to continually get higher, while the availability of money to the majority of people gets continually more limited. FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING is a key part of the problem here.Many good documentaries have now exposed how the central banks have long been allowed to simply ‘imagine’ money out of nothing, loan it out at interest and then expect the money, plus the interest to be paid back (see: https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/6348/the-biggest-scam-in-the-history-of-mankind-hidden-secrets-of-money-ep-4-mike-maloney and .https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/61619/century-of-enslavement-the-history-of-the-federal-reserve). Professor Richard Werner published a scientific study and empirical evidence gathered through monitoring a bank’s systems in realtime – he confirmed that this ‘money out of nothing’ approach to banking is indeed how things are being operated (see: Can banks individually create money out of nothing? — The theories and the empirical evidence- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521914001070)Banks can legally loan out a factor of around 30 times the amount of money they actually hold! Imagine if you could ‘loan’ people 30 times more the actual amount of money you have in your savings – plus charge them interest – you would be very rich in no time, as long as no-one found out what you were up to! Yet this is exactly what banks have been doing via fractional reserve banking. Not only does this mean that those involved become stinking rich at the expense of everyone else (which could be said to be a form of mathematically managed slavery) – but it gets worse. Since a huge amount of the ‘alleged’ money in circulation is actually credit and loans based, upon which interest is being charged – there actually isn’t enough ‘real’ money in circulation to pay back the interest. This can mean only one thing – many people who take out ‘loans’ and ‘credit’ WILL be unable to repay them. It doesn’t matter how ‘hard’ people work or really what they do, there WILL be a high percentage of people who go bankrupt. Understanding this mathematical reality is key to understanding how to improve society for almost everyone and is also part of why the claim that ‘poor people are just lazy’ is itself based only in ignorance.ConclusionIf you lack money in our society you will suffer and possibly die as a result. The financial systems are deliberately configured to ensure that a certain percentage of people WILL lack money and that another group of people WILL end up with most of the money – regardless of whether ANY of those people actually provide valuable services to the community. This is not something that could have been created out of pure ignorance or by accident, especially considering the number of ‘economic experts’ tasked with monitoring the situation and setting policy.Somewhere along the way, money stopped being a ‘convenient token for exchange’ and became a ‘weapon of enslavement and tyranny’. The harm caused by this can only be defined as evil, using the dictionary definitions already provided.It is not possible to use the fiat currencies such as US Dollars, British Pounds and Euros without participating in a system that manifests evil on a grand scale. Even if you stop using these currencies and shift to alternatives such as cryptocurrencies, you will still be participating in the same evil since the new tokens can be bought using the old tokens and therefore are still subject to the same problems. The evil is both systemic and very well engrained into society’s structure. Logically, the only solution is to somehow try to ‘reset’ the economic system and ownership of ALL resources or to somehow evolve beyond the use of money altogether. In my experience, evolution means adapting to live from the heart in a way that brings real and felt balance. It is no surprise that it is the financially poorest among us who are often known and felt to have the biggest hearts – they know what it is to suffer and they seek to prevent it wherever they can. Those with the most ‘wealth’ also stand to gain greatly through a process of genuine, heart centred balancing in society – since they will no longer need to live in fear in their gated communities – wondering when the rest of the world will come to find them seeking justice. Compassion has the answers here and those who have been born into a world that has been turned against them while simultaneously trying to bury them in guilt for being too ‘lazy’ no matter how hard they try and too ‘stupid’ no matter how inventive they try to be – are the ones with the most to gain, the least to lose and often with the most compassion.Wishing you well,Ura SoulJoin a community aimed towards healing, balancing & evolving - plus receive rewards from the Steem blockchain at https://www.ureka.org]]>https://www.ureka.org/thoughts/view/108909/are-capitalism-and-competition-are-natural-or-is-a-lack-of-compassion-being-framed-as-normalWed, 24 Jul 2019 16:40:04 +0100https://www.ureka.org/thoughts/view/108909/are-capitalism-and-competition-are-natural-or-is-a-lack-of-compassion-being-framed-as-normal
So.. supporters of capitalism often claim capitalism is natural and a result of natural hierarchy that cannot be escaped. The inference is that 'nature' (which is not usually defined by them) is 'designed to be' or 'just is' a certain way that means that the 'best' results occur as a result of competition and 'winning' in that competition. Since capitalism is essentially based on competition, they say that capitalism is both 'the best' and 'most natural' economic system.

Here's the thing. In case you missed it, the people with the most money today are among those who have created the global tyranny system and fraud machine that involves the banks, military industrial war machine and so many other corrupt entities. Their 'wealth' is largely the result of manipulation, coercion, theft and even genocide. I'm not talking about 'average millionaires' here - I'm talking about the people calling the shots in the oil, weapons and related industries who essentially have unlimited money. So is this REALLY 'natural' and 'the best' we can do?

The response to this tends to either be along the lines of 'the problem is government, not capitalism' or 'you are jealous'. Setting aside that these people simply don't know whether I or anyone else is truly jealous or not (hint: I'm not) - let's look at government. If government disappeared somehow, then we'd still have many of the same needs, wants and people in society. Given that it is well documented that the governments that these supporters of capitalism rightly criticise for their activities ARE operated today in answer to the wealthiest capitalists - how do the pro capitalists suggest we sort this out? The wealthiest capitalists would still use their wealth to achieve similar outcomes, with or without a government – they would just change the form of their connivance.

I have never heard from them a real answer to this from die hard capitalism fans and while I am open to hearing it, I think this lack is because there really isn't an answer to it that doesn't involve some kind of wealth redistribution or financial reset - which they generally will never accept. This is a large part of why 'anarchist' groups fight forever, going around and around in totally pointless 'discussion' over the phony left/right paradigm.

To achieve actual change means we need to move beyond this and analyse reality accurately and without bias. As a systems engineer, this is what I am trained to do and it is totally obvious to me that any form of government will be corrupted by whoever wants to corrupt it unless changes are made on very deep levels in nearly all of us so that we don't support this happening - which would also mean that any government would have to be radically different to how it is today if we are to truly thrive. The rules of society have to fully support the voice and power of all people to stand up for themselves in the face of tyranny - including the tyranny of wealth that wants to buy your enslavement. I also know that the heartless among us will try to dominate in whatever the prevailing economic system is and if you completely remove government they would likely rejoice in that they wouldn't have to put up the pretense of actually caring about you any more, via their bought and paid for politicians.

Solving a systematic problem requires systematic thinking and solutions - we need to understand the principles involved and each live our lives in the ways that are most aligned with real freedom and balance – otherwise we will naturally end up reliving the repeating patterns that we have been living for a very long time. Reality cannot change until we do. Ultimately, free will leads the way in this and so it is not for me or anyone else to determine for others what their future holds or how they must live. However, that extends both ways and it is not right for people to try to tell me how to live, either directly or via government and it’s monopoly on violence.

I actually choose to live in balance to the best of my ability, which means you won’t ever find me starting wars, fights or other forms of imbalance – so before judging that I am some kind of ‘threat’ to something, perhaps first consider the number of millions of people who have died in the name of governments or at their own hands – often people the governments have been ‘elected’ by.

My overall takeaway point for fans of capitalism is this:

If you think that capitalism is the most fair way of living, but it’s dependency on money/tokens and ‘proof of ownership’ is entirely open to corruption – shouldn’t you be putting massive amounts of resources into creating a totally foolproof way of having real and fair capitalism that isn’t corrupt? Since without this, it is no better than any of the corrupt systems you claim it 'beats'. The only move I see do to do anything remotely like that is the cryptocurrency scene and many in that scene do indeed identify as anarchist in thinking (remembering that anarchy only means ‘no rulers’). In my analysis, there is a reason why pro capitalists don’t have an immediate answer to this challenge and it is because there really isn’t a fully workable solution to this that doesn’t ultimately rely on ‘who has the bigger guns’. There’s no way around it – humanity has to be evolved to a pinnacle of enlightened compassion before we can have real balance and even stand a chance of being psychologically and emotionally clear enough to know, feel and live the genuinely ‘best’ economic and societal way on this planet.

If capitalism really is the 'best' and most 'natural' system, then it's fans need to demonstrate how a finite planet can sustain ever increasing scales of armament in it's competitions without also developing a deep compassion that inherently draws people together such that they don't even want to compete with each other.

Those who are heavily invested in 'winning' will unconsciously refuse to consider the alternatives because they hate 'losing' and haven't thought freely enough to learn that there really can be alternatives that are better for everyone, including themselves. If you could have everything you actually need to feel good, why would you continue to want to compete? Perhaps because you have bought into the idea, maybe long ago, that you are a loser? Healing these old imprints and memories is necessary to be truly free as you can't be free as long as your own subconscious is controlling your choices for reasons you aren't even aware of. Personally, I know I feel best when everyone else feels good and has what they need - I would have to deeply question myself if I felt 'good' because people were in a famine, for example.

The basic, compassionate and empathic reality behind the intent to find real balance and dispense with the idea of competing against everyone needs to be more deeply understood and felt into and without this, we cannot even call ourselves fully human - let alone humane.

Wishing you well,

Ura Soul

]]>ura soulhttps://www.ureka.org/thoughts/view/108301/capitalist-entitlementTue, 28 May 2019 13:52:39 +0100https://www.ureka.org/thoughts/view/108301/capitalist-entitlement
Having listened to and participated in the endless circle of 'debate' on the topic of capitalism vs non capitalism in the compassionate anarchy group on Facebook (for far too long), I think I have seen most arguments raised for and against capitalism. I really enjoyed this short video on the topic from 'thought slime' on youtube as it gets close to my position...

One of the main claims made by pro capitalists against what they call 'the left' is that 'the left' are 'entitled' and somehow want to take the fruits of other people's labour. In reality, however, I have yet to meet anyone who actually wants to do that - in general, most people are just seeking a greater balance in society, so that millions of people aren't starving, while a few live with wealth that is absurd (and usually doing nothing to improve the situation for others). Arguably, what is needed is for the majority of people to realise the problem and work together to overcome it - however, this requires them to settle their differences, have enough resources to live on a daily basis already and to not get caught up in thought prisons and traps such as state communism and other such 'fun' solutions to the human condition. Generally, the lack of resources and the resulting depression and disease is enough to stop most people.

In truth, 'the left' ACTUALLY refers to 'the left wing', which is a phrase from the French revolution which began when opponents to monarchism sat in the left wing of seats in parliament. So basically, 'left wing' means 'opposed to empire building and artificial hierarchy' and can include a wide array of people with different aims, thoughts and backgrounds. Generally, they have just had enough of being enslaved and are intent on making a difference (hence the guillotines). Unfortunately, we haven't collectively understood yet, on a deep level, the hows and whys of how we create our own enslavement and so we haven't fully solved the problems yet (and neither has France, despite the recent months of riots and protests there).

Anyway, in this video - we find an explanation of why it is really capitalism that is entitled:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXRl5ZgDwPM

Wishing you well,

Ura Soul

]]>ura soulhttps://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/111183/mandatory-vaccination-forced-onto-german-children-unable-to-attend-school-fined-2500-euros-a-red-flag-not-to-ignoreSun, 17 Nov 2019 21:06:40 +0000https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/111183/mandatory-vaccination-forced-onto-german-children-unable-to-attend-school-fined-2500-euros-a-red-flag-not-to-ignore
I highly recommend taking some time to go through the links in the vaccine katalist at my social network, ureka.org - here:https://www.ureka.org/pages/view/11768/22-medical-studies-that-show-vaccines-can-cause-autismWishing you well,Ura Soul#vaccination #politics #germany]]>https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/109952/%E2%80%98all-of-us-are-in-danger%E2%80%99-john-pilger-delivers-warning-from-julian-assangeWed, 04 Sep 2019 02:44:22 +0100https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/109952/%E2%80%98all-of-us-are-in-danger%E2%80%99-john-pilger-delivers-warning-from-julian-assange
READ MORE: https://on.rt.com/a0zdJournalist John Pilger has delivered a stark warning from WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange, who said that his persecution is intended to kill dissent. Speak up now, Pilger said, or face the silence of a new kind of tyranny.RT LIVE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFAcqaNzNSc Check out http://rt.comSubscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=RussiaTodayLike us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnewsFollow us on VK https://vk.com/rt_internationalFollow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_comFollow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/rtFollow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RTFollow us on Soundcloud https://soundcloud.com/rttv#RT (Russia Today) is a global #news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 1 billion YouTube views benchmark.]]>https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/109949/left-vs-right-debates-%E2%80%93-making-sense-of-divide-conquer-inc-antifa-vs-the-proud-boys-in-portland-usaTue, 03 Sep 2019 17:58:25 +0100https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/109949/left-vs-right-debates-%E2%80%93-making-sense-of-divide-conquer-inc-antifa-vs-the-proud-boys-in-portland-usa
We can never know the truth and make the best decisions if we aren’t making sense in our own thinking. Often, we do not realise that part of our own logic does not make sense and may be lacking depth or contain hidden denials which present errors to us as if they are facts. Simply being able to say ‘that sounds reasonable’ is not itself evidence of accuracy: as any battle hardened engineer, tasked with creating reliable technology can attest to - ‘the devil is in the details’.

I have watched the ongoing conflicts between the imagined political ‘left’ and ‘right’ with a mixture of bemusement and concern. To me, there are so many gaps in the logic being used to prop up arguments on both ‘sides’ that at times I find myself needing to just lift out of it all and watch from the sidelines, amused at the situation. Since the imbalance and conflict involved can easily escalate and become extremely serious (as history has shown so many times), I feel compelled to do what I can to add some of the puzzle pieces into the situation that I see to be mostly missing.

Part of my challenge here is that once people are locked into fixed viewpoints they tend to filter out any information that contradicts them – even when the new information would actually free them and help them to feel better. How about we carry out a thought experiment here and suspend our own version of reality temporarily to look at things differently to see what can be learned?

]]>https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/109452/google-censors-to-protect-trump-too-his-ties-to-mafia-and-blackmail-are-scrubbed-from-search-suggestionsSun, 18 Aug 2019 15:10:12 +0100https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/109452/google-censors-to-protect-trump-too-his-ties-to-mafia-and-blackmail-are-scrubbed-from-search-suggestions
Since the project Veritas whistleblower testimonies from employees of Google, Facebook, Pinterest and Twitter have shown how these companies are falsifying/manipulating search results to attempt to deny aspects of reality that they don't want to accept as real - many have claimed that their actions represent an anti 'right wing' agenda and even on that is anti Donald Trump. The reality, though, is quite different. They are being used to cover up evidence of serious crimes at the top levels of government, possibly also including Trump and the groups behind him.

Wishing you well,

Ura Soul

]]>https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/109189/wikileaks-wins-us-court-victory-as-judge-rules-dnc-case-has-no-merit-assange-is-a-constitutionally-protected-journalistFri, 09 Aug 2019 16:54:32 +0100https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/109189/wikileaks-wins-us-court-victory-as-judge-rules-dnc-case-has-no-merit-assange-is-a-constitutionally-protected-journalist
This is one of the stories that got lost down the memory hole created by the mass shootings recently. After all of the manipulation directed towards Julian Assange and Wikileaks, leading to his possible extradition to the US, some of the key foundations in the 'case' against him have crumbled following a ruling in the case against Trump and Wikileaks for 'Russian Collusion' in the US election 2016. Now that Assange has been affirmed protection under the US constitution and ruled to be a journalist, perhaps his extradition will fail too. On top of all of this it turns out that some of the main 'evidence' against Wikileaks comes from newspaper stories via an editor whose brother is now a presidential candidate. Seems legit! Wishing you well, Ura soul]]>