Navy Is Underfunding Nuclear Research Says U.S. Reps

The Reactor Pressure Vessel aboard the STURGIS, the Army’s retired floating nuclear power plant being decommissioned, is carefully lifted in order to be placed in the specially designed shielded shipping container to its left at the end of May. Photo via U.S. Navy
by Timothy Gardner (Reuters) – Two Democratic lawmakers urged the U.S. Energy Department to move faster with a research program on converting nuclear reactors in the Navy’s submarines and carriers from bomb-grade uranium to a safer fuel, a letter viewed by Reuters showed.

Last year, Congress approved $5 million in defense policy and spending bills for the Energy Department’s office of Naval Reactors to research whether naval reactors could convert to using low-enriched uranium.

But the National Nuclear Security Administration, part of the Energy Department, has not transferred the money from its Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (DNN) office to the Naval Reactor office, a move necessary for work to start, said the letter dated June 26.

Democratic U.S. Representatives Jim Langevin and Rick Larsen, members of the House of Representatives’ Committee on Armed Services, have pushed for the conversion of Navy ships to low-enriched uranium, saying that doing so would reduce the risk of the fuel getting into the hands of militants. In addition, if the United States converts its fleet, it could be used as an example to prevent other countries that want to use HEU in their fleets from doing so.

“We are at a minimum disappointed with this development,” the lawmakers said in the letter addressed to the National Nuclear Security Administration’s head, Frank Klotz. “We urge DNN to ensure this funding is allocated as Congress intended.”