Briefing Detail Page

Change Text Size:

Integrating Care for Dual Eligibles: What Do Consumers Want?

Monday, December 12, 2011

The 9 million beneficiaries dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid are generally poorer and sicker than other Medicare beneficiaries, tend to use more health care services, and thus account for a disproportionate share of spending in both programs. Many deficit reduction plans under recent discussion have recognized the need to improve care for this population and provide care in a more cost-effective way.

Dual eligibles present a special challenge for those seeking a more efficient and coordinated care delivery system. As integrated care models expand, consumer protections may be needed to assure choice and access to current providers and culturally appropriate services.

How do Medicaid and Medicare coordinate payment and care for people covered by both programs? Are HHS initiatives encouraging innovations to integrate care for dual eligible beneficiaries? What kinds of programs are currently available? What do consumers think about fee-for-service plans, special needs plans or other programs in which they are currently enrolled? What lessons for program design can policy makers learn from the attitudes of consumers?

To answer these and related questions, the Alliance for Health Reform and the AARP Public Policy Institute sponsored a December 12 briefing. Panelists were: Lindsay Barnette, Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office at CMS; Lynda Flowers, AARP Public Policy Institute; Suzanne Gore, Center for Health Care Strategies; and Corrinne Altman Moore, Office of Medicaid, Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services. Susan Reinhard of AARP and Ed Howard of the Alliance co-moderated.

This briefing presented the results of two recent focus group studies that shed light on the experience of dual eligibles, which programs they prefer and how they and other stakeholders might be engaged in the program design process.

Susan Reinhard, director of the AARP Public Policy Institute, set the stage for a discussion of how best to care for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid at a Dec. 12 briefing on this topic, cosponsored by the institute. (4 min.)

Lindsay Barnette of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services presented the results of focus groups with Medicare/Medicaid dual eligibles at the Dec. 12 briefing cosponsored by the AARP Public Policy Institute. (12 min.)

Lynda Flowers of the AARP Public Policy Institute discussed what Medicare/Medicaid dual eligibles think of five different models of care, at the Dec. 12 briefing cosponsored by the institute. (11 min.)

Corrinne Altman Moore of MassHealth described how Massachusetts is working to integrate care for Medicare/Medicaid dual eligibles, at the Dec. 12 briefing cosponsored by the AARP Public Policy Institute. Susan Reinhard, director of the Public Policy Institute, listens. (13 min.)

Suzanne Gore of the Center for Health Care Strategies discussed the importance of stakeholder engagement and good communications with Medicare/Medicaid dual eligibles, at the Dec. 12 briefing cosponsored by the AARP Public Policy Institute. (10 min.)

Toolkit: Emergency Preparedness in the U.S.: The Ebola Threat

Is the U.S. prepared for a potential virulent pandemic? This new Alliance toolkit examines public health infrastructure, funding and policy levers that deal with these kinds of health crises in America.

The Outlook for Health Insurance Subsidies

Telemedicine Toolkit: The Promise and Challenges

The integration of technology and health care is on the rise. Although evidence shows that telemedicine has improved access to health care and resulted in lower costs in rural and underserved areas, challenges to expansion include reimbursement policies and acceptable security measures. A new Alliance for Health Reform Toolkit, “Telemedicine: The Promise and Challenges,” addresses the effectiveness of telemedicine as a tool for communication, as well as the expected outcomes and challenges ahead.

King v. Burwell Toolkit: To Subsidize or Not to Subsidize

A new Alliance for Health Reform toolkit, "To Subsidize or Not to Subsidize: King v. Burwell," will help you prepare for and understand the Supreme Court’s King v. Burwell decision, which could come as early as Friday. A major challenge to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is before the Supreme Court, which is expected to make a decision in the King v. Burwell case by the end of its term in June 2015. The case concerns the legality of health insurance tax credits offered through a federally run health insurance marketplace, as opposed to a marketplace established by an individual state.

Toolkit on Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS)

The aging of the baby boomers and the increase in the number of old-old persons (those 85 and older) are predictors for the increasing need for long-term services and supports (LTSS). Among persons age 65 and over, an estimated 70 percent will use LTSS. A new Alliance for Health Reform toolkit, “Long-Term Services and Supports: Changes and Challenges in Financing and Delivery,” provides a background on LTSS and discusses policy issues surrounding the topic.