I'm in Denver and I will be [looking up]. I'll keep my camera on me and try to look towards that area of town between noon and 1pm throughout the
week. I'm on the opposite side of where the original guy took the footage so we'll see if I can find anything. Of course I'll post here first if I
do.

For crying out loud....it is not insects or bugs!! The reporter lady already told you that the aviation expert doesn't believe they're bugs, and
obviously, the professional camera man from Fox who did the followup filming did'nt think they were bugs.....she stated this many times at the end of
the video. If you look at the footage, there are many times you see a shiny object.....bugs are NOT shiny (yes, maybe lightning bugs at night LOL).

The only other possible explanation is that the reporter is in on the hoax. Maybe not explicitly. Maybe she AND the aviation expert (and camera man)
all are secretly colluding to sell this UFO story. Of course, they are just putting their professional reputations on the line for a silly UFO story?
For ratings? That's a flash in the pan for ratings.....up one day, gone the next. I don't buy it. I really do think it's a genuine mystery.

It's obviously not a plane or helicopter....can fly like that with such incredibly erratic movements. My next best guess is a radio controlled (RC)
plane or toy......but again, the movements are too erratic for even that.

I'm not sure if that has been mentionned but the actual content they got from the second camera they really don't show much more than 2-3 seconds
and it seems slower than the other object.

On their website all that Fox has about their own footage is this:

"We wanted to verify the video we saw was legitimate and not doctored in anyway. So our photojournalist set up his camera in the same spot, and shot
video from just before noon until just after 1:00 p.m. He also captured something unexplained on video."

At the end when they talk about the amateur doing the filming the reporter says it has become an obsession for him which is interesting. This reminds
me of the ufo "rods" videos that got debunked on Youtube.

The reporter lady already told you that the aviation expert doesn't believe they're bugs, and obviously, the professional camera man from Fox who
did the followup filming did'nt think they were bugs.

The reporter says what you tell her to say ... that's her job .
The aviation expert is an expert on aviation not videos of insects .
The cameraman shot a video of what appears to me to be a bird though we only see a couple of seconds of it , he works for the Fox affiliate so I would
expect he'll say what you want him to .

I see no entomologists in the piece saying they're not insects so I believe they are on the basis of probability .

If you take a look at the footage again when you see birds on the right, you'll notice that the birds are going pretty fast too which goes against
the point of view that what we are seeing is "super fast"

"I'm part of a community discussing the UFO you mentionned today and we would like to know if the 2 footages you have (the amateur and yours) are
similar in terms of speed and turns of the object.

Cause what you show on the report is only about 2-3 seconds of footage of your cameraman's video and the object appears to be slower.

Also, do you know if the amateur has released his content on the internet?

Thanks!"

Got this in response:

"The footage we shot is slowed down and yes in real time it is just as fast. I don't think he has put the footage on line. He is afraid for his
safety because he believes its a secret military operation. Thanks fir your feedback!"

That was my first guess. But I ruled it out when the report said very clear "It's not a bug".

Anyway, I have no idea about the actual origin of the object, but this is a first time for me. I have never saw an UFO video and believe completely
(well, 90% at least). Even when you have a reliable source and history, my mind always remain skeptical; "this could be light reflections, natural
phenomena and etc". This time my mind is really boggled.

Will wait for better footage (better high speed camera) to dismiss insect possibility.
As Gortex said, the aviation expert is not a bug expert...and the reporter simply parroting what he said is not case closed on the bug hypothesis.
Not saying it is, but that seems to be the most accurate and sensible one for now. Hopefully its not and we find out ET is doing donuts in our
atmosphere...but meh, my stupid rational brain wants actual answers verses something to believe in just for the sake of belief.

I know the feeling. But lets assume that the thing in the footage is a bug. It appears for several hours during the various footage (at least this is
what the report say). If that's the case should't we see a lot more bugs? Not the lone wolf flying like a drunk teenager mosquito?

I mean, I really want to believe this is really something unusual and so far it's looking good, but I do share this annoying habit of trying to
mental disprove everything to myself. But I don't know, I have little to none knowledge of bug's behavior. I just find it weird to be always only
one flying.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.