President Trump angered allies last week with new tariffs on steel and aluminum.

The first job of the president of the United States is to ensure that the American people feel safe and secure. That springs not only from a well-trained military, but also from a diverse and technologically advanced economy. Donald Trump has acknowledged the relationship between the two in his National Security Strategy, in which he promised that “my Administration would put the safety, interests, and well-being of our citizens first.” And in his 2018 trade policy agenda, he said that the US would protect American prosperity by maintaining economic prosperity at home, fostering “free, fair, and reciprocal trade relations,” and defending the US and its allies from “economic aggression.”

But the Trump administration has undermined American security with its aggressive economic policies — and his approach to economic management is making many Americans feel less secure, pitting future security against appeals to current Trump voters.

Over time, this approach will not only increase costs to steel-consuming sectors but will also increase costs for finished goods such as cars. If US cars become more expensive, than US auto producers may become less competitive. Moreover, the oversupply problem will only be exacerbated, given that cars are another sector in which the world has significant oversupply and under-demand thanks in part to new services such as Uber. Finally, several nations have already announced that they may retaliate against other important sectors of the US economy. Hence, Trump’s approach to trade policy will affect economic outcomes for an even greater number of workers in many sectors, making them feel less, rather than more, secure.

Trump administration officials downplay or misunderstand how this strategy may affect the economy. Thanks to the recent tax bill, the US will have to borrow ever larger sums at rising interest rates to finance our budget deficit. Meanwhile, staff at the Federal Reserve are concerned about inflation and the economy overheating. Hence, policymakers are tightening monetary policy. But in the wake of higher interest rates and trade actions that seem to be undermining the rule of law in trade, foreign investors are less likely to buy Treasury bills. This in turn could lead to a diminished willingness and ability to invest in America.

Trump’s macro-economic management of the US economy also undermines economic security. While the Trump administration asserts that tax cuts are good for average Americans, without sufficient revenue the US government will have to cut spending, whether for it’s for infrastructure, research and development, or benefits such as tuition-fee assistance.

Yes, Trump is happy to tout America’s rising employment and consumer confidence numbers under his administration. But in reality, wages are rising slowly, and individuals are receiving small bonuses rather than pay increases. Trump has done little to pressure employers to invest in rising wages, benefits or further skilling. Taken in sum, these statistics signal more people are feeling more optimistic — but they do not show that Americans are feeling more secure.

For individuals to feel secure, they need job stability, sufficient income, and in the case of the US, access to benefits such as health care, benefits and training. And for long-term security, Americans need education and infrastructure to develop their skills for a modern and evolving economy. But the Trump administration, and many Republicans in Congress, want to cut these types of assistance. If they succeed, ever more Americans will feel even less secure. Tariffs do nothing to help this — and, by protecting industries in decline instead of focusing on industries of the future, risk only jeopardizing, rather than protecting, America’s security.

Susan Ariel Aaronson is a senior fellow with the Global Economy Program. She is an expert in international trade, digital trade, corruption and good governance, and human rights. As part of her work for CIGI, Susan is currently developing a digital trade and digital protectionism strategy for Canada. She is also co-authoring a paper with Senior Fellow Patrick Leblond about China’s efforts to be a leader in the digital trade sphere.

Returnto cigi2017

Who Are We?

We are the Centre for International Governance Innovation: an independent, non-partisan think tank with an objective and uniquely global perspective.

Subscribe

Footer

This site uses cookies to provide the best online experience. By using this
site, you agree to the use of cookies and collection of personal information per our
Privacy Notice. To alter or disable the use of cookies,
adjust your browser settings.