Saturday, May 18, 2013

This will turn out to be a multi-part conversation regarding
shooting infrared (IR) images with a Sony Nex-7.On April 11th I gave a teaser about the
subject; on May 3rd I gave some brief samples of the images captured shortly
after I got the camera back from Life Pixel.Now, I go a little more in depth on the subject of shooting IR with the
Sony Nex-7 along with the processing of the files.The good, the bad and the ugly.

Garrapata State Park, Carmel California

18-55mm lens 18mm (27mm)

f/11 1/125 ISO 100

Bixby Bridge, Big Sur California

As shot, converted to black & white and Color conversion

20mm (30mm) f/11 1/80 ISO 100

When I first began looking at the Nex-7 as a candidate for
conversion I found little written about it.The most information I found was located on the various websites that
offer the conversion services.So far to
date I've not found one instance of anyone writing about their experience.

Julia Pfeiffer Burns State Park, Big Sur California

20mm (30mm) f/16 0.6 seconds ISO 100

Yes, you can "smoke water in IR

I highly recommend a visit to Life Pixels website as you'll find a wealth of
information on the various filter choices, camera choices as well as sample of
images and tutorials that include a multipage eBook "Digital Infrared
Photography Primer" found here.I figure why reinvent the wheel when the kind
folks at Life Pixel already has one rolling?You'll find much more information here than what I can hope to offer so
go visit the site.

A word about Life Pixel.I am not associated with the company, nor was I asked to indorse them in
anyway.I feel that when you find a
great company to do business with it's beneficial to spread the word.After all I want them to continue providing
the great service for years to come.

Garrapata State Park, Carmel California

18-55mm lens 50mm (75mm)

f/16 1/100 ISO 100

As written earlier, I choose to convert the Nex-7 the same
as I did the 1DsII; using an "Enhanced Color Infrared Filter".This filter transmits more of the visible red
and is similar to a Wratten 70 gelatin filter.Since it passes more visible red
light the IR images have more color in them; more color in the sky as well as
foliage.The files can also be processed
in Photoshop to produce a pleasing end result.

There's a problem though.First, the filter is slightly darker thus the view from the LCD and
Viewfinder is darker, much darker.The
best I can describe it is that it's like looking at the LCD through a pair of
sunglasses.I've got a friend who shoots
infrared using a 720 filter which is brighter.He keeps the camera in "P" mode and gets excellent
results.I tried that and quickly found
it doesn't work for me and went back to the way I normally shoot which is
"M" (manual).I found by
shooting manual I can see the scene clear enough in bright sunlight using
either the Viewfinder or LCD.All the
images included here were shot in manual mode.

Same image from Tucson, Arizona

first converted to black & white the second converted to color

20mm (30mm) f/8 1/500 ISO 100

Okay there's another problem. I figured to get rid of the bad first.Photoshop and by extension Camera Raw can not
properly process any infrared image which has a White Balance set for IR.All's not lost.If you use a Nikon or Cannon you simply use
the software that came with the camera to open the file and then save as a
Tiff.The same holds true with Sony.Sony has a program they call "Image Data
Converter".That's the good
news.The bad news is that it doesn't
support 64bit which is what I have on my computer.There's a work around.I open the program and save 2-files to Tiff
then close it down before it stalls and quits.Then I open it again and do 2-more.It sucks but until Sony gets around to supporting 64bit I'm stuck with
this type of workflow.One other thought
before I end this portion.I shoot RAW
files as there's so much more information included than with a Jpeg.Please, if you're going to shoot IR do
yourself the favor of using the best possible capture you have available and
shoot RAW.

RAW file as seen in Photoshop

Same file as seen in Sony Image Data Converter

Image seen after opening in Photoshop and converting to color

20mm (30mm) f/8 1/640 ISO 100

A typical file when opened in CS6 is 6171x4114 pixels
(17x11) at 360 dpi resolution and 16 bit.We're talking enough information/resolution to print almost any size you
want.This file as an example (DSC0030)
as shot was 23.88 MB; once converted to a Tiff the size is now 145.29 MB
before any further processing is done.Using a false color action the file is now 290.57MB.

Entering Death Valley California

20mm (30mm) f/16 1/100 ISO100

Converted to black & white and cropped to suit

Lenses used:The Nex7
came with what appears to be a good 18-55 "kit lens".Normally I shy away from using any kit lens
as they are routinely not the "best".I did however use it on this outing; primarily to see what it would
produce and to get a better feel for the camera.I ordered the new Sony 20mm pancake while the
conversion was taking place.My thoughts
were that it would make for an even smaller footprint (which it does) and with
the crop factor of 1.5 it would keep me close at 30mm of what my widest lens on
the Cambo and Phase One DF is.(I've
included the 35mm focal length as follows 20mm (30mm) or 18-55mm lens 18mm
(27mm)).

Along the to Death Valley California

20mm (30mm) f/11 1/125 ISO100

Color conversion, cropped to suit

Mesquite Sand Dunes, Death Valley California

20mm (30mm) f/16 1/125 ISO 100

Color conversion, cropped to suit

Death Valley, California

20mm (30mm) f/8 1/125 ISO 100

Color conversion, cropped to suit

﻿

As an end note to this section; I liked the way the Nex7
handled so well that I've since ordered another one to keep as a color
camera.Additionally I've ordered the
newly released Zeiss 12mm and 32mm lenses to be used on either camera body.

20 Mule Team Canyon, Death Valley California

20mm (30mm) f/9 1/160 ISO 100

﻿

20 Mule Team Canyon, Death Valley California

20mm (30mm) f/9 1/160 ISO 100

I decided I liked the coler better

I think I've included enough sample images to prove that the
Sony Nex-7 is a great candidate for infrared conversion and with just a little
bit of extra work you'll get great images either as they are, color converted
or black & white.

Zabrisike Point, Death Valley California

20mm (30mm) f/11 1/200 ISO 100

There's going to be more to this so stay tuned.If you have any questions, comments or
suggestion please feel free to contact me.

3 comments:

Camera Raw can white balance IR images with a bright R channel if a custom camera profile is used. Just use the DNG profile editor and shift the default temperature to a cool value. This will shift the entire range of the Camera Raw slider to include values which can white balance the image correctly.

About Us

Subscribe To

Followers

Follow by Email

Follow Us on Instagram

WE'RE ON FACEBOOK TOO

"The trademarks, logos, and service marks (collectively the "Trademarks") displayed on this Web Site are registered and unregistered trademarks of Don Libby its affiliates and others. Nothing contained on this Web Site should be construed as granting by implication, estoppel, or otherwise, any license or right to use any Trademark displayed on this Web Site without the written permission of Don Liiby or such third party that may own the trademark displayed on this Web Site. Your misuse of the Trademarks displayed on this Web Site, or any other content on this Web Site, except as provided herein, is strictly prohibited."