Fallout from Paris attacks: UK on alert to crack down on anti-Semitism

British politicians are now seeking unprecedented new powers to snoop on internet sites such as ours. Our days as a viable website are probably numbered. Lasha has been advised by an anxious friend, “Stop writing these articles you keep writing! It’s no longer safe!”
— Editor John Scott Montecristo

Comments in italics by Pandora Pushkin

UK HOME SECRETARY THERESA MAY:Please don’t leave Britain—we love you!

British Home Secretary Theresa May said she “never thought I’d see the day” when members of the Jewish community would be “fearful” of remaining in the UK.

She pledged to introduce more police patrols in key Jewish areas, including synagogues and schools, after counter-terror officers warned of a “heightened concern” about the safety risk to the Jewish community.

Speaking at the ceremony organised by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, Mrs May said: “The dreadful events in Paris are a reminder of the serious terrorist threat that we face.

“The attack on a Jewish supermarket, where four people were killed, is a chilling reminder of anti-Semitism, not just in France but the recent anti-Semitic prejudice that we sadly have seen in this country.

Apparently half the British public, we are told, nurse anti-Semitic sentiments and stereotypes. But who decides what make you an anti-Semite? The Jews, of course. The slightest criticism of Jews, including calling a Jew a Jew, is considered anti-Semitic. (Pandora Pushkin)

“I know that many Jewish people in this country are feeling vulnerable and fearful,” Mrs May said, “and you’re saying that you’re anxious for your families, for your children and yourselves.”

She added: “I never thought I would see the day when members of the Jewish community in the United Kingdom would say they were fearful of remaining here in the United Kingdom.”

The trouble is, you can’t suggest that fearful Jews should go to Israel if they don’t like it in Britain, because that too is “anti-Semitic”. Recommending aliya (emigration to Israel) is now regarded as anti-Semitic because it implies that you want to get rid of Jews. (Pandora Pushkin)

“And that means we must all redouble our efforts to wipe out anti-Semitism here in the United Kingdom,” the Home Secretary concluded.

This comes just days after Scotland Yard assistant commissioner Mark Rowley, who heads up Britain’s counter-terrorism force said a security review was being carried out in the UK in the aftermath of the Paris shootings.

Meanwhile the Association of Chief Police Officers revealed that it is looking to beef up security in Jewish neighbourhoods in the aftermath of the bloody atrocity.

In other words, British taxpayers—half of them allegedly “anti-Semitic”—are being forced to pay for extra security for the Jews they allegedly hate. How bizarre! (Pandora)

A total of 17 people were killed during terror attacks in France over three days, including four Jewish men who were shot dead by Islamist terrorist Amedy Coulibaly, after he stormed a kosher supermarket in Paris.

This began with a deadly massacre at the offices of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, where eight magazine staff, a caretaker and a visitor were killed.

Yes, we’re all advising our Jewish friends to stop wearing their kippas (skullcaps) in public. Unfortunately, this too is considered “anti-Semitic”, and we could well be reported to the relevant authorities for telling Jews to leave their kippas at home! (Pandora)

Last week, Belgium counter terror officers thwarted an advanced plot to kill police officers in the street when they launched a series of raids across the country.

Fifteen suspected jihadists were arrested, while two were killed in a tense police shootout in eastern Belgium.

Speaking at the ceremony in London, Mrs May said Britain would not be the same without people of different faiths.

She told the audience in London: “In Europe, of course, we have seen large numbers of Jewish people emigrate and others are questioning their future.

“There have been other attacks as well, the like of which we never thought we’d see again in Europe — in Brussels, of course, where four people were shot and killed at a Jewish museum and in Toulouse, where three children and a teacher were murdered at a Jewish school.

“So I want to say this: Jewish people have long been an important and integral part of this country, we cherish the contribution you make, not just in the past but today and every day.”

Hear, hear! Well said, Theresa! We are all Jews now! (Pandora)

“We are all Jews now!”

156 thoughts on “Fallout from Paris attacks: UK on alert to crack down on anti-Semitism”

Your article expresses my views entirely. However didn’t this Theresa May woman suggest using the the old Treason Act of yore to deal with the so-called Jihadis? If so, she should also realise that good King Edward I’s edict expelling the Jews from England has never been repealed. At least not by any lawful government. Cromwell was lunatic, Protestant Pharisee who didn’t know his bible. The 15th Psalm of the Hebrews is quite explicit on the subject of usury! The last line reads, “He that putteth not his money out to usury, nor taketh reward against the innocent, he shall never be moved.” So our banker friends will never stand in God’s holy place. Doctor Lasha should your website be closed down, would it not be possible for you to set up a proxy website in a free country like Russia or Greece where a scholar was recently acquited of so-called holocaust denial?

According to my deductions after reading ‘A History of The Protestant Reformation in England & Ireland’ (by a William Cobbett, himself a Protestant, written in 1824-1827), the Reformation in England was no more than used for a royal writ to plunder and steal the accumulated property and other wealth of the Catholic Church. To facilitate this theft and influence, Oliver Cromwell ignored the Eviction Edicts, and summoned those who could finance his usurpations. The financial district in London was set aside FOR THESE…

Anyhow, the ‘aristocracy’, ‘peerage’, royalty’ of England are BEHOLDEN to those-who-made-it-possible for them to be so. Before, most of them were what we American Southerners call ‘white trash’; or ‘carpetbaggers’. They have conveniently forgotten their roots, and will kill to keep the lie.

Gilbert, A very informative comment from a Southern gentleman. I have made a note to read the book in question. Many years ago when I was in South Africa, in the so-called deep north, I would often hear complaints from Afrikaners that a certain people were “Royal Game” and were untouchable. A real salt of the earth people are the Afrikaners. In the so-called, democratic west we now have untouchable Royal Game. I live in Asia under a so-called military junta but I feel a lot freer here than in Europe or the Anglo-Saxon countries. There is no political correctness, although a few ecaudal simians educated in the west are attempting to introduce the concept. It is well known that those who cannot be named were behind the Northern War of Aggression. Shall we call them the Dark Lords. A.K. Chesterton called them the New Unhappy Lords in his book of that title.

Thank you for the kind words, Felix. I have known some Afrikaners who were some very capable and refined people – and who clued me in on the troubles, there, too. One such was the wife of a good friend (who is now deceased, due to a car accident), who was both beautiful, well-spoken and well-educated (before her Ph.D. from Georgetown, she had been born in S.A., and educated in a convent, there), and with whom I became a favorite. I truly looked forward to visiting and just hearing her wonderful voice. She laughed when I told her that my mother begged me not to go to that ‘backward, dangerous country’ when I had to make a decision to go there, or to college (I WANTED to go to S.A., to oversee a ranch about 100 miles north of Johannesburg, which job I was offered out of high school, because of my skills)(it was very appealing to me, as a young man, and I often wish I had gone, anyway). (As it turned out, the prior overseer had been tied to a tree and mutilated by negroes in a tribal dispute into which he had become involved because two factions had worked on the ranch!)

Anyhow, a kinsman – the Hon. D. French Slaughter, Member of Congress – was one of the 30 Representatives who would NOT applaud or stand up for Nelson Mandela when he came to speak at the U.S. House of Representatives, and later filled-me-in on the true troubles, there. (He was die-hard AGAINST the way the US government has postured itself against the Afrikaners during the ‘apartheid’ brouhaha.)

South Africa has titanium ore, which is used to coat the outside fuselage of fighter jets – a necessary component – which was one of the many reasons the predatory governments wanted to reduce S.A. to the status of a pimp state. From what I read, it has become even worse, as time goes on. Cite City of London Corp. for the woes, ultimately.

I’m quite sure the JDL that bankrolls Darkmoon — and Darkmoon is JDL that’s for sure — all U Darkmoon jews are very very upset and very very appalled and like totally opposed to the Jews in England getting all sorts of extraordinary police protection that no else in England gets. yes siree, john dee!

Let’s get this clear. You agree with Crazy Joe that this website is financed by the Jewish Defense League (JDL) and that guys like Lobro, Franklin Ryckaert, Pat, Brownhawk, and all the other regulars here (including me) are either “darkmoon Jews” or gullible idiots who have been taken in by Lasha Darkmoon?

Is that what you’re saying?

Let’s hear it loud and clear, Karen, so that we know exactly where you’re coming from.

I don’t suppose it occurs to you that if this was actually a website run by Jews:

(1) you would not be allowed to say so without your comment being deleted!

(2) that you would have to a be a damn sight smarter than Kevin MacDonald and all the other website editors who publish Lasha’s work that you and Crazy Joe have figured out something that nobody else has figured out: i.e. that Lasha is a Jew financed by the JDL! Do you really think you are smarter than Kevin MacDonald?

Tell me, why are you trying to damage Lasha’s reputation? Are you this character Joe calls “the Mad Jewess?” Or are you just suffering from extreme jealousy of Lasha’s indisputable literary talents?

Now why don’t you just run along now and try spewing your crap someplace else where they’re not wise to you, yet. it’s only a matter of time on THAT score. And speaking of which, anyone who continues to read you is certainly wasting theirs.

I can smell disinfo Joe and Lasha doesn’t have it and since Jews don’t know how to live without dis-infoing, that means Lasha is not a Jew. Why is it again that you think Lasha is ADL? Cause she’s not a racist nigga hata like you?
Isn’t that the standard line? If you don’t agree the whites are about to be “holocausted” and you challenge the notion every country they colonized should be theirs, and you don’t obsess or tolerate every subject misdirected towards a meeting about the victimized white race which basically determines to those obsessed that your “anti-white”, that makes ya a Jew or Jew lover? I know I been called one enough times but those in the know, know who guides the race obsessors world wide and I’ll give ya a hint, ” “Controlled anti-semitism is good for Jews”.

I’m disappointed. My heart was bursting with the joy of revealing my love for Incogman and his snit over one remark made in the heat of righteous anger ( I was viscously abused by a poster and he didn’t step in proving he is No Gentleman whereas I Am a Lady) and you won’t post it.

TOBY: What are you complaining about? Haven’t all your comments been posted?

i didn’t even know what “felcher” meant. i had to look up the meaning on google. wow, I had no idea such a filthy sexual perversion existed!

i’m now wondering if this karen t character is a man? a filthy faggot of the worst kind who has infiltrated this site to pour out abuse and perverted scat on the owners of this remarkable site. karen t seldom seldom says anything worth listening to. he/she should be given the boot!

admin, it’s time you purged this site of these mentally sick trolls like karen t and crazy Joe. they don’t belong on this site. they belong in a loony bin.

joe obviously has some neurological disorder but if put on a 1-post/day diet, he is at least entertaining and sometimes even hits the head of the nail with a perceptive comment, even though his everyday wars are on a minuscule scale.

this karen person is like his less talented sister, i recall her once complaining that she is unjustly victimized because she is a vegetarian and a gentle person, etc, etc and the next time her mouth spouts more filth than a busted flush.

i think that a database of whitelisted email addresses should be set up and only those who are duly registered should be allowed to comment.

OK, first off I’ve no idea why Dr. Macdonald would lower himself to print Lasha Darkmoons stuff. Much of it as I’ve previously pointed out is fabricated, such as the ‘dildo exhibition’ not at a public school as Lasha proclaimed, but some gay thingamagig for queers at a college. She incorporates sloppy research to discredit her entire narrative. Her manipulations of posters such as Historysbunkbunkbunk , a high five to his ailing ego she converted him; her ‘mystery woman’ persona supposedly due to Zionists relations meanwhile her sister, cousin and uncle are supporting this site. Like Makow she’s pushed pushed pushed…gifted poet (?) I checked Amazon, nada. Comments on this site are an insult to thinking people, Ruth Bernstein, gone to an ashram to dry out but hey here she is .You spawns of Satan published my full name and Ruth Bernstein/Mad Jewess egged your readers on to attack an innocent woman, not me, with baseball bats-how original- stolen from a Tarantino shit movie! you accuse me of jealousy, an old, old jew ploy…yeah all of us goy are jealous of your $$$success. Everything about Lasha this site the commenters stinks and if anyone doesn’t see it you deserve to go down…Nature Rules

TOBY (MONITOR): Remarkable! I’m glad you posted this. Lasha will also be pleased to understand your psychology at long last. She could never figure you out.

I feel profoundly sorry for you, Karen. Truly. The deepest pity that your mind should be so disturbed and eaten up with obvious envy for my beautiful and talented niece. What sort of person, I ask myself, would fall in love with Incogman, an internet shadow, and get involved with people like the Mad Jewess?

May I ask how much longer you intend to post on this site? What do you hope to gain from the freedom of speech we have allowed you? Would it give you satisfaction if we let you go on spitting in Lasha’s face ad infinitum?

A FINAL “FUCK-YOU” TO KAREN T, previously identified on this website as KAREN TOFFAN!

I can dispose of two of your silly allegations right way, both of which illustrate your intellectual dishonesty on the one hand and your low intelligence on the other.

Example of intellectual dishonesty:

[1] “Much of it as I’ve previously pointed out is fabricated, such as the ‘dildo exhibition’ not at a public school as Lasha proclaimed, but some gay thingamagig for queers at a college.”

This was NOT a fabrication. Lasha had relied on a website that stated clearly that the dildo incident had taken place in a public school in Minnesota. SHE GAVE A LINK TO THAT SITE IN HER ARTICLE. Why don’t you mention that, you dishonest bitch?

This is what Lasha said in her article: “Shocking images out of a classroom in nebraska [we are told in a controversial new article] illustrate how 11-12 year olds in 6th grade are being taught under new federally mandated Common Core educational standards how to use strap-on dildos.”

So LASHA DID NOT “FABRICATE” anything, you lying cunt! She was misled by her source!

It was only later that the truth emerged: that the incident had actually occurred in a college in Toronto. AND LASHA ACKNOWLEDGED THAT SHE HAD BEEN MISLED BY HER ORIGINAL SOURCE AND APOLOGIZED FOR HER UNDERSTANDABLE ERROR!

How dare you call this “fabrication”, you stinking bag of shit! Yes, Karen Toffan, you REEK of dishonesty as well as jealousy and spite!

And here now is an example of your low intelligence:

“gifted poet (?) I checked Amazon, nada.”

Tell me, you pathetic moron, do you think someone who was forced to hide behind a pen name like “Lasha Darkmoon” would be prepared to publish a book under the name of “Lasha Darkmoon”? Of course not! Her cover would be blown at once. She would then be traceable, because her royalties would have to go into a bank account in her real name. Which would lead to her home address.

Whatever Lasha had written would have to be published under her REAL name! Never thought of that, did you, you mentally sick lamebrain?

I feel sorry for Incogman if YOU are the best deal he can end up with! You have a foul mouth like a reeking sewer, like a stinking and pus-ridden vagina from hell. Yuck! women like you don’t deserve men to fuck you! Even a rutting dog would be well advised to keep away from you!

Don’t worry, Lobro. If Lasha needs it, I asked my Uncle Remus if he minded if I fixed up a cabin for a bug-out place for her. He said ‘Sho, dest as long as you ‘vite dat po’ lil’ Miss Lucy, too, cuz ahs werried ’bout her since dat Mista Toby done sent de chile away!’. (He also expressed to me that he was a bit concerned about Lasha’s temper, but I assured him that I did NOT think she’d strike him.)

Whoa, there, Brownhawk! I did not say she need SHARE a cabin with Uncle Remus. She can have her very OWN (and I could even arrange indoor plumbing!). It needs a little work – but it has POSSIBILITIES… Imagine: no close neighbors (‘cept ME), a garden spot, a dawg – and I’d even supply her with a shotgun (to fend off pests)(and me), and maybe even her own horse! Free firewood, a satellite dish receiver (I know y’all want to stay in touch), and a good spring not too far behind from which to tote water. All she’d have to do if trouble comes is holler real loud (my cabin is only about a half mile away), and I’d come a-Jeepin’ to the rescue! What-the-hell does it take to make an English lady happy, anyway??! (I’ll buy her some goddam TEA at Krogers when I go to town every month – and some soap, too, dammit!) 🙂

Thank you so much for mentioning my poetry (I suppose you meant ‘GH’ rather than ‘BH’). It makes me think of something I suggest you ALL do when pondering whether or not Lasha Darkmoon is a ‘real’ person: READ HER POETRY. It is, obviously, penned by the same, complex female. A ‘group’ effort would not come up with all that. She is a very interesting person, indeed – but very much a ‘real people’, IMO.

(btw, my own pen name, here, is just that – a PEN NAME/sock puppet – whatever you want to call it. Lasha knows, but I trust her not to tell.) 🙂

Ahhh no, GH, not that I don’t appreciate your poetry (I believe you posted some for us a few articles ago, and I do think it is very good 🙂 ), it was BH’s fun injun style I was meaning! BH’s poetry seems to get to the bottom of the personality issues that are constantly distracting from the important stuff (J*ws). Not like I haven’t said that before, but who the h*ll ever listens to me? Oh, he said she said they said… Aaarrrgh!!!

She revealed herself as intelligent, however I have only read a few of her things. If I were to guess, this woman is extremely racist.Her allusion to McDonald {McDonald is what I term I ‘reasonable’ racist, if that’s possible} in a positive light while decrying his work relationship with Darkmoon denotes as much but what it also denotes is a lack of toleration for those fellow whites who don’t feel the need to break every question down in the history of mankind to a “how does that apply to the white race and is it good for whites” analysis. Then again, she may be a krypto. Jews are very good at disruption under false pretensions. They have led and helped formulate many anti-semitic and other racist operations that are, supposedly, goy ops. Of course don’t tell them that, cause once race has entered their skulls their brains have been placed on loan to the Jew and they are incapable of intelligent thought.

It’s always the same. Anything to destroy liberty and yet the ignoramuses who make up the majority of the population will say:

“Yeah, but it keeps us safe in’it, you know all this police presence and more laws (read legislation which aren’t laws)? After all, if you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve nothing to fear eh?”

I knew this day would come. I knew it wouldn’t take long before governments found ways of completely controlling the majority of websites out there. Most of the last couple of years I’ve been using the library to go online as I didn’t want an ISP. They’re completely controlled by Jewry and every sight that criticises Judaism is off limits. I wasn’t able to read any of Lasha’s articles and the truthseeker website (and many other I normally frequent) were blocked.

If there’s anything I hate most in this world it’s people deciding what you can and cannot look at.

It’s interesting’, to say the least, that their excuse is ‘hate’. It is and always will be up to the individual to like, dislike, love or hate whomever they choose to and NO government body has the right to dictate otherwise. Hate is a perfectly natural, human instinct. And the hatred for Jewry, is and always has been, entirely the problem of semitism, yet, as I state this, most of here know that 90%+ of world Jewry aren’t semitic.
The government is sadly using emotive reasoning in order to destroy our liberty, for common sense, critical reasoning will prove, overwhelmingly, that Jews are a threat to the world, even though they make up 0.2% of the world’s population.

The only way people in the UK will have their freedom is when they see the futility of government. This land needs to stop supporting it by ending all voting. Yes, I’m an anarchist. I do not vote for I do not believe that anyone should govern man other than themselves.
We all know also that government is full of psychopaths, for they always gravitate to positions of power, so why oh why are people still supporting it?

My parents governed me until I could govern myself. I never left home so that I could then hand over the reigns to government to continue where my parents left off.

If you want freedom to continue in this world then you have to end government completely. If you end government then you end the judiciary and the police. If you end the judiciary and the police, the very psychopaths who start wars and seek complete control over the world’s people instantly lose their protection and methods of control. Then it’s simply a case of starting the ‘hunting season’ and removing these evil bastards from the face of this earth, once and for all.

You really cannot use the system to beat the system. It’s like trying to vote out paedophilia with a panel of paedophiles deciding.

The bottom line – as long as government remains, we will eventually lose all of our liberty, regardless whether you vote or not. As long as government remains there will be nothing you will be able to do to stop the creation of the New World Order, now most certainly in its finishing stages.

And it’s not really the fact that sites like these will be shut down, although it will greatly sadden me, but moreso that there’s no doubt in my mind they’ll track down the publishers of the websites AND THE COMMENTS and bring them up on hate speech and terrorism charges.
Remember, every comment that people write on these websites will be recorded. There’s nothing Jews like doing better than spying. And it’s really not that hard to identify these posters, especially with today’s technology of the elites which is about 50 years advanced to what we think is state of the art.

Of course it’s a libertarian argument. I am after all an anarchist, which is the next logical progression for a libertarian and one, whom above all believes in liberty.

You most certainly don’t. That’s for sure. And this is what completely destroys any socialist/national socialist argument. You seek to impose your authority who are imposing it upon you. This therefore makes you no different to your enemy.

Here are some facts about anarchy SPQR just so you can maybe and I state maybe, understand reality a bit more.

1. In an anarchy there would be no New world order.

2. In an anarchy there would be no psychopathic elite.

3. In an anarchy there would be no homosexual agenda, forcing their perversions upon children at schools.

4. In an anarchy there would be no dominant religion and all religions would have the freedoms to worship whomever they so choose.

5. In an anarchy there would be no law and order and instead it would be up to the individual to decide how those who have wronged them should be handled.

6. In an anarchy paedophiles would become rapidly extinct. With no police force to protect them, they would simply be removed from public forthwith.

7. In an anarchy there would be no world wars.

8. In an anarchy there would be no msm and academia propaganda.

9. In an anarchy there would be no international bankers, deciding how the world should be run.

10. In an anarchy the 0.2% population of international jewry would have as much control on the world and their respective habitats, as a 2 month old would have holding the leash of a Staffordshire pitbull terrier.

11. In an anarchy liberty would reign triumphant with no conservatives, liberals or socialists to enforce their political ideologies upon society.

12. In an anarchy SITES LIKE LASHA DARKMOON would never have to worry about being closed down for their opinion.

You see SPQR, the most natural environment for any being on this planet is an anarchy. And ironically, something that you fail to see is that possibly, under a National Socialist/Fascist controlled state there would not be a Jew problem, if that is they hadn’t infiltrated it; what there would be however is a Fascist problem which, quite frankly, is no different to the Jewish system of control. Instead of Jews it would be people like Orwell’s O’Brien and that frightens me even more quite frankly.

You fascists are pretty clueless. And yes, I’ve read “La dottrina del fascismo”. You wish to impose totalitarianism upon the people, under the authority of fascism and I simply don’t agree with that concept.

What you people fail to see and realise is that NO ONE has the right of authority over any individual in this world, without their given consent. No one has the right to restrict another’s liberty without their consent. To impose upon another individual, without their consent is nothing more than tyranny.

The reason that Jews have control in this world is because they have built this system of control with which to do so. Destroy the system and the Jews’ house of cards comes toppling down.

National Socialism was in essence a form of anarchy, in the sense that had it prevailed per its original intention, and coming out of the chaos of the post-war dissolution, COULD be seen as, say, ‘training wheels’ for an eventual ride on liberty’s ‘bicycle’. We’ll never know of course, but yes, an equivalent anarchy is certainly called for, so long as out of ITS chaos comes the order you would achieve. And at this point it would seem that there’s nothing left to lose for want of the freedom to be strived for.

I disagree. The only goals of anarchy is the end of government and restriction upon people’s lives. The ethos of an Anarchist is taking individual responsibility for one’s life. National Socialism on the contrary is the state taking control of one’s life.

Now to look at the third reich, one will see that in order to clean up the mess that had happened after the terrible Versailles Treaty, a very much draconian act, draconian measures had to be implemented. A weed had most certainly taken over control of Germany which needed to be removed.

“The road to hell is paved with good intentions.”

This is how one can define socialism and national socialism. I am a nationalist, but an anarcho nationalist, just like my ancestors, the Scots and the Britons were. Through socialism we create services that become authorities within a land.

From looking to help society we hinder it. Socialism decrees that we all now have a license to do the simple of jobs. No license, no job.
This very much reminds me of Rev 13:17. In the pat I could go into a bar and ask for work. “Can you pull a pint and how good’s your arithmetic?” was the reply. Now you need a license or no job. And who benefits? Well, those who give the licenses out – more money, more taxation. The bankers are again happy at more theft from the public’s purse. So now we are not only taxed during our job, but before we even have one in order to get it.

I’ll never agree with any form of socialism, because it’s nothing more than the building of the path to tyranny and control. Take the film Gattaca and eugenics. It started off to help people from common ailments and devolved into people being dictated what their life would be before they were born. That’s nothing but elitism and totalitarianism. And what if those ailments aren’t the result of natural causes but instead man’s manipulation of nature?

As long as there is the state Brownhawk, there will always be control over the individual by another. Hitler’s drive to weed out Jewish perfidy, sadly resulted in extreme control within society. Sadly, through Germany’s desire to be free, they ended up enslaving themselves yet more, destroying the very thing they sought to create – liberty for the German people and freedom from Jewish control.

“Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster… for when you gaze long into the abyss. The abyss gazes also into you.” F.Nietzsche

As Nietzsche states above; Hitler became that which he sought to defeat. It’s not that I disagree with Hitler. His desire to free the Sudetanland and unite Germania I wholeheartedly agree with, but Hitler became no different to those whom he fought against, which is the curse of Socialism in its drive to do good for humanity.

You seek to impose your authority who are imposing it upon you. This therefore makes you no different to your enemy.

This argument is put forth over and over by people who don’t know anything. Were the National Socialists no different from the Bolsheviks since they used guns? Or since they wore uniforms? Fascists seek to impose authority to maintain a society’s health and to keep people like jews and their communist zombies from coming to power.

1. In an anarchy there would be no New world order.

That’s only if the entire world accepted anarchy, which it doesn’t. If one group of organized people is cohesive and wants global domination, you can’t fight them with anarchy, you have to fight them with greater organization.

2. In an anarchy there would be no psychopathic elite.

Really? If the world is in anarchy then who’s to stop psychopaths from coming to power? You’d need an army or some kind of organized group of men.

3. In an anarchy there would be no homosexual agenda, forcing their perversions upon children at schools.

In a state of anarchy, who would there be to put forth laws and values which state that homosexuals can’t do those things? Straight people? But it’s anarchy; homos can do what they want, right?

4. In an anarchy there would be no dominant religion and all religions would have the freedoms to worship whomever they so choose.

And what if one religion, or a bunch of religions, have conquest in mind and attain lots of followers? You’d need a religion, or some form of authority, to counter it. So again, your anarchy falls apart.

5. In an anarchy there would be no law and order and instead it would be up to the individual to decide how those who have wronged them should be handled.

You think it’s a good idea to let individuals decide what’s legal and what isn’t? You think common people even have the capacity for that? Did you see the Ferguson rallies last year? That’s what you’re asking for.

6. In an anarchy paedophiles would become rapidly extinct. With no police force to protect them, they would simply be removed from public forthwith.

Why would they be removed from public? How would people know pedophilia is bad if they’re not taught that’s it bad? In your anarchical system, anything goes, right?

7. In an anarchy there would be no world wars.

Only if the entire world embraced anarchy, and even then, the world be engulfed in global chaos. And how do you get the world to embrace anarchy? Through force? Isn’t that kind of contradictory?

8. In an anarchy there would be no msm and academia propaganda.

In an anarchy there’d probably be no education to begin with. You need schools to educate people, you need money to build schools and hire teachers, you need a stable economy to have money, and you need leaders to make sure the economy is stable.

9. In an anarchy there would be no international bankers, deciding how the world should be run.

You defeat internationalists with nationalism, not anarchy.

10. In an anarchy the 0.2% population of international jewry would have as much control on the world and their respective habitats, as a 2 month old would have holding the leash of a Staffordshire pitbull terrier.

See above.

11. In an anarchy liberty would reign triumphant with no conservatives, liberals or socialists to enforce their political ideologies upon society.

What kind of liberty would this be? The kind you see in the Mad Max movies? Would you prefer that over classical art, classical music, grand architecture, and the things which make life worth living? Things that are only possible through civilization?

12. In an anarchy SITES LIKE LASHA DARKMOON would never have to worry about being closed down for their opinion.

No, if European nationalists took control of Europe, this site would not have to worry about being closed down.

You see SPQR, the most natural environment for any being on this planet is an anarchy.

And yet, most successful species of animals survive through group cohesion and organization.

And ironically, something that you fail to see is that possibly, under a National Socialist/Fascist controlled state there would not be a Jew problem, if that is they hadn’t infiltrated it; what there would be however is a Fascist problem which, quite frankly, is no different to the Jewish system of control.

It’s “no different?” You don’t think there was an aesthetic and spiritual difference between National Socialist Germany and jew-run Weimar Germany?

What you people fail to see and realise is that NO ONE has the right of authority over any individual in this world, without their given consent.

No one has any “right” to anything. Not in a legal, political, or moral sense, anyway.

No one has the right to restrict another’s liberty without their consent

So a White man has no right to restrict a jew’s right to engage in nation-wrecking? Really?

To impose upon another individual, without their consent is nothing more than tyranny.

No, tyranny is when a madman rules a society for his own benefit. Giving people orders, telling them “this is how you will be” is not tyranny when those orders make people strong and great.

The reason that Jews have control in this world is because they have built this system of control with which to do so. Destroy the system and the Jews’ house of cards comes toppling down.

A system of control will be necessary to STOP jews and other harmful peoples from coming to power to begin with. The inborn individualism of Europeans is part of the reason why jews so easily infiltrated our societies.

I don’t know about you but I don’t want to live in a country that looks like Somalia.

Somalia is not even a country anymore. It is a collection of quarrelling war-lords. That is the ultimate result of anarchy. Such a “system” can indeed no more be controlled by Jews, but that is “freedom” at a very high price.

“This argument is put forth over and over by people who don’t know anything.”

On the contrary I very much do, as I’m about to show you in this reply.

“Fascists seek to impose authority to maintain a society’s health and to keep people like jews and their communist zombies from coming to power.”

Since when did I give my consent to you or any fascist to impose your authority upon whomever? And then what happens in that society when you decide to pick on another part of society? It’s about the state controlling what IT FEELS makes a good society. A majority is always one. Why does 50.1% of a population have the right to decide what the other 49.9% should do?

1. Well obviously! If Ireland decided to become an anarchy and the NWO decided it wouldn’t be then it would merely tell its puppet politicians to invade it and install another puppet into power, as it’s currently doing in the middle east.

2. The reason why the psychopathic elites have the power that they have, is because they created the police force to protect them. Remove the police force and you remove their protection. In an anarchy, your presumption wouldn’t happen as it would be stopped before it started. You’ve been watching too many post apocalyptic, anti anarchy movies, created for the sole purpose of instilling fear into the public to reject anarchy and continue along with the sham that’s democracy.

3. You miss the point completely. The reason why we HAVE the homosexual agenda is becuase OF the state. Homosexuals have elevated into positions of power with which to enforce their agenda. In an anarchy they have no position to be able to rise in, for there is no state/government. There would be homosexuals in an anarchy, which although I disagree with, I have no right to dictate to another how they should live their life, however as I’ve already stated, if you have no position of authority with which to enforce your agenda, then no agenda is enforced! Parents who send their children to schools would simply say NO to homosexuality and that would be the last of it. If homosexuals continued to insist it, then I should imagine the people within the community would give them an ultimatum to either stop their agenda or leave the community.

4. And who are you speaking of now? Could it possibly be Islam by any chance? Look, this is really simple. Islam has spread today in the west because of the agenda to flood the west with them. If you stop this and repatriate these Muslims to their lands then guaranteed, they’re not going to rise up in arms to wage a holy Jihad. They have their lands and they’re happy with that. This is not the dark ages. The reason Islam is doing what it is, is because the west is invading their lands.

5. Of course I do. It’s called individual responsibility and freedom to make your choices. In life every choice is followed by a consequence. The Ferguson rallies were a result of many things – anger at a very authoritarian police force and the result of multiculturalism and multiracial societies, especially when part of that society is continually reminded of the past which adds fuel to the fire. In an anarchy, people would have the individual choice to form communities with or without non indigenous peoples as it should be. It is the state that has forced immigration and thus multiracialism and multiculturalism upon a populous who were never consulted. In the case of Britain, the rallies for Enoch Powell, by people from one end of the political spectrum to the other proved this so.

6. Paedophilia is the perversion of the elites, as is homosexuality. It’s just filtered down through society over the years. Yes, anythind would go in an anarchy, meaning that when mum and dad find out that so and so has been tampering with their children, then so and so would be paid a visit he’d never forget. There would be no police to protect him, no jail to put him in, segragated from the rest of the inmates. It would be instant justice being metted out. People in today’s society still see paedophilia as being wrong. They believed the same about homosexuality, but courtesy of state enforcement through schools and the msm, it’s now acceptable. Given time the same will happen with paedophilia. So, if there’s NO state to enforce paedophilia upon the public and sway their opinion to their favour, then nothing’s being enforced and therefore end of the paedophile promotion agenda. I should imagine that in an anarchy, paedophiles would end up being ripped apart and noone’s really going to give a shit are they?

7. Again yes, but you’re stating the obvious. Anarchy does not need to be embraced for it simply is. There’re no political ideologies to embrace. There’s simply no government or state with which to enforce these ideologies upon the people, by psychopaths wanting control and power. And I hate to break it to you SPQR but the world is already in chaos, thanks to the western states and governments. It couldn’t be any worse. The poor bastards in Palestine have been living in chaos since the partition of Palestine and the world remains silent. The poor bastards in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya are living in chaos thanks to western intervention into their lands. I could go on, for the buck doesn’t stop there.

8. Says who? What is education today if not state indoctrination and brainwashing of the individual? How do you think people learned in the past without the state? Parents passed on their knowledge to their children. It was the state that created 2nd wave feminism, breaking up the family in order to get the children into nursery sooner and on the indoctrination assembly line. The state decides today what the children are taught, not the parents. And who says you need money? You could easily bring back a far more fairer barter system. The $ today is worth all of 2cents and yet you want to keep a money system which has resulted in the elites being where they are, to the detriment of the populous? Bring the money system crashing to the ground too I say!

9. As I’ve said I’m an anarcho nationalist. There are many branches of anarchy just as there are nationalism. Go figure…..

10. I’m looking above and?

11. And again, you bring in the post-apocalyptic, post-nuclear wasteland where everyone’s murdering and eating one another old chestnut. Don’t you realise that this vision of anarchy has been constantly promoted by tptb in order to have daft twits like you be dead against it? You’ve been indoctrinated to accept the tyranny of the state over the freedom of nature. And who’s to say that art, music and architecture can’t happen in an anarchy? And as for civilisation, well I tend to look at that as Civil-lies-ation which is exactly as it’s been throughout history – psychopathic families rising up to enslave the populous, hoarding all the wealth and forcing their newly controlled populous to invade other lands, kill the locals and plunder their resources for themselves. Yes, civilisation is really such a fantastic thing isn’t it?

12. Again, you fail to see that all political organisations within a state are infiltrated. Sure, the European nationalists (I’m presuming you mean the individual nationalist parties within Europe as ther isn’t a European nationalist party as it’s an oxymoron?) may well allow Lasha her freedom, but for how long? Many nationalist parties have been infiltrated. The BNP is a classic example of having been infiltrated. It no longer is the party that was once ruled by Tindall. Instead they now have N.Griffin who appears to be siding with Israel and Zionism, something Tindall would never have done.

“And yet, most successful species of animals survive through group cohesion and organization.”

And that can be achieved in an any anarchy SPQR. Anarchy simply means without rule.

“It’s “no different?” You don’t think there was an aesthetic and spiritual difference between National Socialist Germany and jew-run Weimar Germany?”

Well of course there was a difference, but you fail to see the bigger picture. I stated in my reply to Brownhawk on National Socialism that draconian measures had to be implemented after the draconian act which was the Treaty of Versailles, however, like any society that relies on a state governance over the individual is not asked for but simply taken without consent. The state whether run by Jews or not, is still and always will be the state that takes without consent.

“No one has any “right” to anything. Not in a legal, political, or moral sense, anyway.”

I agree with that other than the legal part. Legality is all about making contracts, therefore something that is legal is something that has been agreed upon by two or more people through a contract. In fact I should have made myself cleared that no one has the right and every right to do what they will. My point in this is that you fail to see that the state believes it has the right to enforce authority over people without their consent. This is the point I’m promoting.

“So a White man has no right to restrict a jew’s right to engage in nation-wrecking? Really?”

I though you just stated that no one has any right to anything?
However…..
In this current state controlled society no one has any right to stop Jewish nation wrecking. In doing so they’re shouted out as anti semites. In an anarchy, no state = no control. Therefore no Jews would be wrecking anything.
And nations are dead. Years of brainwashing has destroyed the very concept, something I’ve written about many times and lately on here in the last couple of Lasha articles. Like it or not, the world today is a globalist state. It’s many inhabitants are predominantly globalists whether they like it or not. They eat the same foods, watch the same TV & films, follow the same sports, wear the same clothes, do the same outdoor pursuits…..There’s very little today that differentiates between nations, other than language and/or dialect.

“No, tyranny is when a madman rules a society for his own benefit. Giving people orders, telling them “this is how you will be” is not tyranny when those orders make people strong and great.”

What a ridiculous answer SPQR. Tyranny is rule by absolute power. Stripped down to its most basic common denominator it’s taking another’s liberty away from them without that individual’s consent. A tyrant simply does because he or she has no regard for those whom he commits his tyranny upon. He does not ask for consent from anyone. He simply does.
And what if people refuse the orders SPQR? What then? Tyrants, wouldn’t care what the decision was of the individual. As so many times in the past, tyrants ordered and those who refused ended up dead.

“A system of control will be necessary to STOP jews and other harmful peoples from coming to power to begin with. The inborn individualism of Europeans is part of the reason why jews so easily infiltrated our societies.

I don’t know about you but I don’t want to live in a country that looks like Somalia.”

No it won’t. You destroy the Jews just as you destroy any other parasite, you remove its ability to feed off of the host.
You simply refuse to play their game. You stop using their banks. You stop playing the insane game of politics. You stop watching TV & Hollywood and remove yourself from the msm’s control. You take your children away from school. You don’t join the police force and the armed forces….
There are so many more things you can do INDIVIDUALLY to destroy this system.
The Jews infiltrated our societies by coercion. And I really can’t think of any time in Europe’s history when it’s been an individualist society. Monarchies have controlled society for a very long time. And I hate to break it to you SPQR but the groupthink mentality that you’re promoting is the very will of tptb who are using this to dumb society down and herald in the NWO.

There are parts of Somalia that are very beautiful. What you mean to say is you don’t want to live in a country like Somalia because of the current political climate? Well, I agree, but then, who created that I ask you? It most certainly wasn’t’ the Somalians that’s for sure.

“Sites like ‘lasha darkmoon’ would never have to worry about being closed down for their opinion”

In effect, what SPQR was saying is that LD would be rendered moot because the brainwashing indoctrination of an “evil is good” scenario would be a done deal.

“you simply refuse to play their game”

Alas, for want of a necessary collective, the realization of a state of freedom to exist ain’t that simple

You are an idealist, Harbinger, albeit an admirable one, in the sense of not seeing the PRACTICAL reality on the ground. And MY intent was to suggest that an essential Nationalism Socialism COULD have served as a precursor to an abolition of a “statist” governing body, implying the abolishing of its authoritarian restrictions. A bottom line is that you draw conclusions that can’t be made because Germany lost the war.

“Hitler became what he would defeat”.

Nonsense. Not that I’m a supporter of NS in every regard (e.g.; with the subject of euthenasia), but I see the National Socialists as ‘training wheels’ that were never removed and COULD have evolved to ‘riding the bike’ of an enlightened individuality.

SPQR was not implying of any brainwashing. In an anarchy, there would be no brainwashing becuase there would be no msm or academia to brainwash and indoctrinate.

If everyone refuses to play the game, then the game isn’t played. It’s really that simple Brownhawk. Our society is hte way it is because people are playing the game through indidual choice. Our society is the way it is because of the weakness of the majority who live within it.

On the contrary Brownhawk, I am and always have been very much a REALIST. I have never been an idealist ever. National socialism could never act as any precursor, to anything other than national socialism.

“A bottom line is that you draw conclusions that can’t be made because Germany lost the war.”

Conclusions? What conclusions?

Hitler very much did turn into the Jew whom, WE ARE TOLD, he despised.

There are two conclsions that can be made about Hitler. And they are:

1. He was what he stated he was and that was one who wanted to see the glory of Germany returned and an end to Jewry.

or

2. One who worked hand in hand with the New World Order in order to further the implement of the New World Order.

You and no one know the real answer for they did not know Hitler.

You and I will always differ, for you believe in a state and I do not. I don’t for the simple reason that the state will always be infiltrated, as any organisation is.

SPQR. Your anarchic vision can only lead to a disintegration of the state, in my view. Though, I like the first quote on the thread. Anarchy is fearful to some! It can be viewed as just a Darwinian ‘survival of the fittest’ attitude.
Pat. The North Koreans strike me as an example. Supposedly a closed society. But still shaping world affairs. At least entertainment news!

How on earth do you come to that conclusion? You do realise that Libertarianism is NOT Liberalism?

I WAS a Libertarian but have naturally progressed into an anarchist.

In all the replies here, everyone is unable to see the simple solution that anarchy promotes – no governance/control. Now, the very reason Jews & the goy psychopathic elite are in power is because the ignorant goy GIVE them that power. They vote in elections. They join their police and armed forces. They join their msm. They teach their education…….and so on.

If there is NO power structure, there is NO control mechanism.

Life is about yourself. It’s about following an honest and good path. You cannot save the ‘profane’. Let them save themselves as you have.

“You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it drink.”

Do what you can do and change what you can in life. Don’t try and do what you can’t and change that which can’t be changed.

People have made their choice. Their miserable lives are their own doing. They’ve chosen to be part of the system and deserve whatever comes their way.

First of all, we don’t disagree to the extent that you seem to think. And in my referring to you as an “idealist”, this does not preclude there being a realist inside of that appellation who understands what an ideal reality would look like in reflecting a true “state” of individual freedom.

In this reply to you methinks you need to read between the lines with regards to certain writings, including, but in no way restricted to whatever I may have said that prompts you to conclude that I believe in a State, when nothing could be farther than the truth! You VASTLY underestimate how far from a belief in one I have! If you have read my myriad of comments over the last several months and taken them in their totality you would see this.

Since when did I give my consent to you or any fascist to impose your authority upon whomever?

Your consent is irrelevant, as you as a (presumably) White man are under attack by a race of highly-organized outsiders who can only be neutralized by a more powerful force.

And then what happens in that society when you decide to pick on another part of society?

A fascist government would not “pick” on a segment of society that does not harm that society. That’s the point.

It’s about the state controlling what IT FEELS makes a good society.

As long as the state operates in the interests of the people, there is no conflict between the two.

A majority is always one. Why does 50.1% of a population have the right to decide what the other 49.9% should do?

The majority of people are idiots and are incapable of leading their own lives, let alone a society.

1. Well obviously! If Ireland decided to become an anarchy and the NWO decided it wouldn’t be then it would merely tell its puppet politicians to invade it and install another puppet into power, as it’s currently doing in the middle east.

So how do you get those puppet politicians out? You need a group of people (nationalists or fascists) to get them out.

2. The reason why the psychopathic elites have the power that they have, is because they created the police force to protect them.

No, it’s because they have been infected by the jew, which is an organism that has evolved to attach itself to a host country and take it over the way parasites in nature gestate in living things and eventually kill them.

The reason why we HAVE the homosexual agenda is becuase OF the state.

No, it’s because we have A particular state that promotes it. NS Germany was also a state, but it didn’t promote faggotry, did it?

I have no right to dictate to another how they should live their life,

So how do you propose stopping gays from having influence in a society without rules or values?

If homosexuals continued to insist it, then I should imagine the people within the community would give them an ultimatum to either stop their agenda or leave the community.

Okay, you can “imagine” it. But how will those people

Islam has spread today in the west because of the agenda to flood the west with them.

Agreed. And if fascists ruled Europe, Muslims wouldn’t be there.

The reason Islam is doing what it is, is because the west is invading their lands.

No,

It’s called individual responsibility and freedom to make your choices.

Give peope “freedom” and they make dumb decisions, like letting jews run their media and going to McDonalds to have lunch. People need to be governed.

In life every choice is followed by a consequence.

Most people have no concept of consequences.

The Ferguson rallies were a result of many things

Except it wasn’t. They were the result of the Jewish media whipping blacks and negrified Whites into a moral frenzy to create disorder and perpetuate a narrative of White “racism.”

In an anarchy, people would have the individual choice to form communities with or without non indigenous peoples as it should be.

What happens if a group of crazy Whites think that that’s immoral, and demand that all communities be “diverse?” You’d need to a state to lay down the law and set them straight: “This country is for Whites only.”

It is the state that has forced immigration and thus multiracialism and multiculturalism upon a populous who were never consulted.

No, again, it’s A PARTICULAR state that has done this, a state that serves a foreign master.

Yes, anythind would go in an anarchy, meaning that when mum and dad find out that so and so has been tampering with their children, then so and so would be paid a visit he’d never forget.

Oh that’s brilliant. What if that “so and so” was the victim of a hoax? What if someone else framed him due to a heated personal conflict? What if mum and dad went to the guy’s home and killed him on a whim without a proper investigation being conducted by police to see if the accusations were true?

There would be no police to protect him, no jail to put him in, segragated from the rest of the inmates. It would be instant justice being metted out. People in today’s society still see paedophilia as being wrong.

rofl. And you accuse me of buying into Hollywood propaganda? Your entire morality is based on Clint Eastwood movies.

And I hate to break it to you SPQR but the world is already in chaos, thanks to the western states and governments.

Chaos? Hardly. The world is being guided to oblivion by internationlist jews.

What is education today if not state indoctrination and brainwashing of the individual?

That’s because education is currently controlled by Jews. Education is not inherently bad. I am fully against mass education; I believe only a select few should be educated, but education itself is a must.

How do you think people learned in the past without the state? Parents passed on their knowledge to their children.

There was always some kind of “state”. E

,b> It was the state that created 2nd wave feminism, breaking up the family in order to get the children into nursery sooner and on the indoctrination assembly line.

No, for the millionth time, it was JEWS who control the state that did that. A state is as good or as bad as the people who run it.

When Jews run your state you get Weimar Germany and modern America. When your own people run your state you get Greece, Rome, and Europe before the 19th century or so.

9. As I’ve said I’m an anarcho nationalist. There are many branches of anarchy just as there are nationalism. Go figure…..And who’s to say that art, music and architecture can’t happen in an anarchy?

How will students learn measuring and geometry if there aren’t schools, or at least tutors or guilds, for architecture?

Yes, civilisation is really such a fantastic thing isn’t it?

It can be. We went to the moon due to civilization, you know. Most specifically due to the civilization Hitler built.

12. Again, you fail to see that all political organisations within a state are infiltrated.

Which is why we need Natioanl Socialists, not kosher nationalists who answer to our enemies.

And that can be achieved in an any anarchy SPQR. Anarchy simply means without rule.

How do you define rule? It seems to me that you define is simply any kind of non-individual will-to-power.

The state whether run by Jews or not, is still and always will be the state that takes without consent.

But consent is itself irrelevant if the state is acting in the interests of the people.

My point in this is that you fail to see that the state believes it has the right to enforce authority over people without their consent. This is the point I’m promoting.

Again, most people don’t think in terms of consent.

I though you just stated that no one has any right to anything?

Yes, in a moral/legal sense. The point is what a person does or does not due, regardless of moralism and legalism.

In this current state controlled society no one has any right to stop Jewish nation wrecking.

No. In this current JEW controlled society people are conditioned to BELIEVE they have no “right” to stop Jewish nation wrecking. In fact, we can already do pretty much whatever we want. Are there consequence? Sure: ostracism, ridicule, jail, and possibly death. But you can still do it. We’re already free. You don’t seem to get that. IT’s because there are people who like you who think in terms of what is or isn’t “allowed” that Whites behave like they slaves they do.

In an anarchy, no state = no control. Therefore no Jews would be wrecking anything.

Jews are a racial group who act as one. An anarchic society would be a sitting duck for them. The state must immunize the nation from jewish subversion; Hitler succeeded in this, which is why the jews got their Russian, American, and British goyim to simply destroy his state.

And nations are dead. Years of brainwashing has destroyed the very concept, something I’ve written about many times and lately on here in the last couple of Lasha articles.

Some nations are dead. Others are going strong.

Like it or not, the world today is a globalist state. It’s many inhabitants are predominantly globalists whether they like it or not. They eat the same foods, watch the same TV & films, follow the same sports, wear the same clothes, do the same outdoor pursuits…..There’s very little today that differentiates between nations, other than language and/or dialect.

This is due to international jewry using America as its launch pad for the uglification of the globe, and your anarchy is just another form of globalism.

What a ridiculous answer SPQR. Tyranny is rule by absolute power.

No one has, or ever had, absolute power.

Stripped down to its most basic common denominator it’s taking another’s liberty away from them without that individual’s consent.

Yes like Hitler took away Germans’ “liberty” to get drunk and high on opium in cabarets. And that was a good thing. The particular state we labor under promotes everything harmful as “good” and everything beneficial as “bad.” Knowing this, the answer is not to do away with the state, as that makes no sense, but to do away with the particular state we have and replace it with one that acts in our interests.

A tyrant simply does because he or she has no regard for those whom he commits his tyranny upon. He does not ask for consent from anyone. He simply does.

Depending on the type of leader he is, his rule will either benefit or harm his people.

And what if people refuse the orders SPQR? What then? Tyrants, wouldn’t care what the decision was of the individual. As so many times in the past, tyrants ordered and those who refused ended up dead.

That’s why Hitler put the KPD into camps, because they refused his orders.

No it won’t. You destroy the Jews just as you destroy any other parasite, you remove its ability to feed off of the host.

No, you destroy the parasite. The thing about parasites is that they can bring down any organism, not matter how healthy.

You simply refuse to play their game. You stop using their banks. You stop playing the insane game of politics. You stop watching TV & Hollywood and remove yourself from the msm’s control. You take your children away from school. You don’t join the police force and the armed forces….

Irrelevant, as the have enough control to destroy you and your family if you don’t “play their game.” So once again, organized- NOT anarchic- resistance is necessary.

There are so many more things you can do INDIVIDUALLY to destroy this system.
The Jews infiltrated our societies by coercion. And I really can’t think of any time in Europe’s history when it’s been an individualist society. Monarchies have controlled society for a very long time. And I hate to break it to you SPQR but the groupthink mentality that you’re promoting is the very will of tptb who are using this to dumb society down and herald in the NWO.

If individuality can destroy this system then it would have been destroyed long ago.

If homosexuals continued to insist it, then I should imagine the people within the community would give them an ultimatum to either stop their agenda or leave the community.

Okay, you can “imagine” it. But how will those people know that homosexuality is something worth stopping if they haven’t been imbued with certain values?

The reason Islam is doing what it is, is because the west is invading their lands.

No, the West is not invading their lands, as the West ceased to exist with its defeat in WWII. Their lands are being attacked by subverted governments from around the globe and their refugees are brought into what was formerly the West to destroy what remains of the European race. Islamic terrorist groups are run by the state of Israel; Islamic terrorism was virtually non-existent before the mid-20th Century.

This really is a long and involved discussion on anarchy. Sometimes this site can be pretty anarchic! I can see where anarchy can work, if everyone is nice to each other. But because we have weaknesses then we will have greed etc. And it’s a bit like the ‘social credit’ system, which sounds fine in theory, but can’t be implemented in only one country. If it is then the other countries do trade embargoes, sanctions they’re called now. Acts of war, virtually. If it was to work anywhere it would have to be everywhere. So if it was ‘anarchy’ then I’m looking at global anarchy! That always conjures up images of ‘post-apocalyptic’ something. Very clever those TV people. But then, if everyone is nice to each other and not following any law, then what’s happening? Natural Law?!? Moral law? Seems reasonable. But then, to someone who is not an anarchist, that would seem like anarchy. SPQR, I think you are changing my mind about anarchy! I see all the global elite making everything up as they go along, like gangsters. Is this not lawlessness? It is anarchy until we have a global government. Then we can have global laws. Then global justice. Isn’t this what the NWO should really be for? Not to enslave everyone for the benefit of a few rich people.

I think it`s probably due to ignorance, most people just plod along, living from day to day, not really thinking, or caring, about anything other than their next meal, or where they will go that evening, and it does no good trying to talk to most, because they just don`t want to be bothered, prefer to live in their nice, safe, little cocoons.. How long, do you think, before there are drones circling over the UK?

And ironically, the very instigators of the world’s problems are the very people the populous seek protection from.

You know Pat, as I get older, I get far more misanthropic. I sometimes wonder why I bother speaking for the people, because if they’re prepared to be uneducated, indoctrinated sheep, marching happily to the slaughterhouse, then why, oh why should we bother with these, wilful ignoramuses? Is this very much not Sodom and Gomorrah (find 50 righteous men and the city will be spared) all over again? I have no desire to jump camps into that of the enemy, but really, if people aren’t prepared to help themselves, why should we? Why is it we see through the façade but no one else will?

Ingrid,“…most people just plod along, living from day to day, not really thinking, or caring….”

Yes, they do. Interesting when one who’s researched the founding of America, it is believed that the elites (all freemasons and members of secret organisation) saw in America, a way to break free from the tyranny that was Britain and give people the chance to govern themselves and take personal responsibility for themselves. As we can see, it was like this, for a while, but they’ve now lapsed back into wilful obedience and the need to be governed.
The latest debacle was Scottish Independence, which was nothing more than a fight between socialism and conservatism, as is always the case. My take on this was always a case of “I’d rather have a nation of independent Scots, than an independent Scottish nation.” The people in Scotland, still were unable to see that all they were doing was handing the reigns of control from one arsehole to another. Scotland would continue being controlled by the crown, regardless of outcome.

“How long, do you think, before there are drones circling over the UK?”

I should imagine not very long I’m sorry to say. Any search on the web and you’ll find police praising them and the sooner they come into use the better. Psychopathy is ripe in the police force.

Maybe it would be better Harbinger, to just plod along, not thinking, or caring. Maybe these automatons are happy. If I think too much about where the world is heading, I have an underlying sense of sadness, and every little positive thing becomes precious..

You won’t be able to plod along not caring nor thinking because you’ve fallen down the rabbit hole and can’t go back to ignorance, not unless you have a full, frontal lobotomy.

You will live a miserable life if you try to change that which can’t be changed. There will be an NWO. There will be a totalitarian, one world government, banking system, religion…… It won’t be stopped.

I think of how best to enjoy my life. I avoid the material and superficial. I am honest and good. I inform those about reality who wish to know.

And you will get sad at what’s coming around the corner because you know it’s wrong and very bad. You are not alone, but trying to change the unchangeable will only lead you to more unhappiness. If you can somehow steal away the wealth from tptb, take charge of the msm and academia as well as world governments, then you can stop what’s coming. But you can’t and these institutions are what’s driving tptb to their new world order.

If Uncle Toby had any brains he would have put up the first post I sent today — the one in reply to Karen about her inane childish remark about Mayberry [ under the syphilis article] . Uncle Toby knows which one I mean, the first one I sent him today. Instead he censors and totally eliminates the first post I sent him and he put up my JDL post, the one on this commentary board above. Not too bright. Look how much trouble he caused for himself.

TOBY: YOUR REQUEST HAS BEEN GRANTED. THE COMMENT HAS BEEN POSTED. BUT DON’T PUSH YOUR LUCK! IF YOU SEND ME 10 COMMENTS A DAY, DO YOU REALLY EXPECT ME TO SPEND ALL DAY FIGURING OUT WHICH NINE TO REJECT AND WHICH ONE TO POST?!? GET A LIFE, JOE.

I never intended for the JDL post to be featured on the board. I figured the JDL post would be the one totally eliminated and censored — not the first one I sent Uncle today. Erase my JDL post on this commentary thread, Uncle, and put up the post I sent you today in reply to Karen under syphilis article. The first post I sent you that you totally eliminated was the most important post to me anyhow, the one that really needs to be read by everyone, the post that means the most to me.

Or, put up my post in reply to Karen/Mayberry under syphilis and keep the JDL post up on this board. Whatever you do, try to think clearly before doing whatever it is you do around here.

And whatever else you may not do or may do, Uncle, put up the first post I sent you today as it was my first post of the day, and you said I’m allowed one post a day. The very reason I wrote the other posts I sent in today is because you always take so long to put up the first post I send you — I figure you decided to CENSOR it as you so many times CENSOR, so I write other posts. I was correct in thinking you Censored my first post as it’s not up on the board where it rightfully belongs. You eliminated it. The first post I sent in is the post most important to me, the one that means the most, the most meaningful to me, and it would be very meaningful for all the readers — if only you had any brains to speak of, Oh Uncle.

Look how much trouble you caused yourself. I never start flame wars. My first post is not flame war-ish, not at all. I figured you would have censored my JDL post and put up the first post I sent you today. But nooooooooo, Uncle has issues when it comes to thinking clearly. That’s very clear.

Joe, y’all are picking on poor Karen so much, that my first instinct is to ‘tweek’ you, and get you in a dither (for entertainment purpose, only), but I was afraid you might blow a gasket by not being able to immediately launch into verbal assault. Am I not merciful?? 🙂

There are two of them, as the comment directly above was put in the wrong place. I posted a second copy of it in the right place just above it. I’m asking admin to simply clean up my mess, that’s all. I seldom post articles I’m not happy with.
Anyway, thank you for your reply. The whole purpose of debate, in my opinion, is to get people thinking. I’m glad you agree. 😉

What a sham. If you want to protect the Ashkenazi sheep find and remove the Gladio sleeper cells/ Mossad/CIA/British Intel rogues in your country Nancy Pelosi…I mean… Theresa May ( yes… that was an insult to your intelligence). Also, this nonsense about protecting the Jews is probably – at least in part- to get the high level pedophile probe involving members of the UK government and the BBC out of the news and minds of the public.

In the US, the “fall guy” for a crime used to be ( and still is at times) the non descript Black guy. Now the muslim terrorist is the “fall guy” world wide. This nonsense has to be stopped.
I can only hope the supposed “good Guys” in the world wide intelligence community ( if they exist at all) would start getting the truth out to the public.

The anglos race-mixed/f*cked around so much with the heebie jeebies, pretty much everyone in England ostensibly White is really a hebe. If all the hebes leave England the only ones left will be Pakistanis, habiru raghead Mohammedans, African pave apes, and shape shifting reptilians in Buckingham palace, Windsor castle and Tavistock.

Everyone I’ve ever met from England while I was in New York City was a total c*nt. Both female and male. I even got held up by a white cockney fellow in NYC — he was with his cohort an African pave ape. He spoke with such a thick cockney accent I wouldn’t have ever figured out what he was saying if not for the knife to my throat. They came up from behind. I figured the cockney fellow wanted my money as he was holding the knife real intensely to my throat [ the nigger was behind me with a knife to my back]. So I was able to figure out what the cockney wanted thru his very thick accent. That’s because I’m real smart. [ yes, I gave him the $$$ in my wallet, 40 bucks.]

The ones who didn’t steal anything from me were all c*nts one way or another. Very bitchy. Very unhappy. Very full of themselves. Great sense of entitlement. Some of them had manners, except their manners were so cold, and so unfelt, so superficial, so cold. Cold is the best description for their manners. I don’t know why they even bother pretending to be mannerly. They’re so phony.

I am jetting between Australia and my ancestral home in Devon, England.

I get a lot of enjoyment reading the conspiracy sites and even used to write jovial comments under a pseudonym.

I delight in the arrant stupidities of the great unwashed masses. Yes, some of you are nearly correct; whilst most of you are useful idiots serving the purposes of us that rule.

We control you for your own good and it is about time you all just shut up and accepted the inevitable. You cannot touch us, as we exist in a totally different stratosphere to you of the unwashed.

Can any of you really imagine my $17,500 per night penthouse overnight-stopover in Dubai ? Can you imagine pouring four glasses of magnificent red wine from a bottle that cost over $3,000? Can any of you imagine the magnificent hostesses that I utilise?

No, you are philistine plebeians who wrongly assert that you have a brain.

Of course, such venal politicians like Ms Theresa May work in our interests; and she will be well rewarded for a job well done.

Accept your roles as slaves to us of the Grand 2% and shut up! We make it so that you can even pretend that you have in your possession that crazy concept called freedom.

Of course, too, you should recognize your own, inevitable downfall, in that those who were responsible for the beginnings of fortunes of which such as you admire the squandering did NOT squander wealth such as you relate, here. In fact, such wealth as YOU admire HAS NO SUBSTANCE. It will soon vaporize. So will you.

No, Brownhawk. It is real. In America, it is spelled ‘Menefee’ (which is probably a poorly-camouflaged copy of the original). The ones I knew were fallen-from-esteem – which will likely be the path of Maxy…

For whatever it’s worth, I’m trying to make clear distinctions when it comes to the jew-word. Relatively speaking, here’s a “who’s who” in attempting to identify each grouping for the purpose of making references moving forward in establishing a common ground. I’m looking at three such groupings that may be sufficient:

1) “jew”: where I have used the word “esoteric”, or the term “International Jewry” in showing what it is that’s under the pile – the “hidden hand” manipulation (devil, or lucifer; “Illuminati”) that through the protocols is talmudically directing the whole planetary show towards its long-sought world totalitarian state.

3) Here I’m not certain of an appellation. In lieu of doing my homework I’ll leave it up to you scholars out there. “Iewe”, maybe? At any rate, whatever it is that would indicate where, given the entrenched and misleading dialectics applied, jew or “jew” cannot be used in describing them. E.g.; here would be populated by the Essenes of Jesus’ time.

Call them Pharisees or Talmudists…. That’s what their famous Rabbi said they practice.

“Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But, throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaption of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew reads his prayer, he is reciting formulae prepared by pre-Maccabean scholars; when he dons the cloak prescribed for the Day of Atonement and Passover Eve, he is wearing the festival garment of ancient Jerusalem; when he studies the Talmud he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies.”

you argue at cross purposes.
freedom is for those who earned it through exercise of worthy intellect and adherence to a moral code.
those, as we know, are in minority, quite tiny in many countries.
they are okay with anarchy among themselves because there is no apparent distinction in outcomes between an anarchical system and an ordered one for such individuals.

the rest must be ruled by fear of punishment and incentive of rewards that a prosperous, well run society offers.

national socialism is the solution because it encourages the society to evolve towards producing more specimens of the first set while reducing the proportion of dumb illiterates.
national socialism encourages the pursuit of beauty in arts and literacy in philosophy and science, honor and work ethics and healthy participation in sports, while it discourages strongly loose morals and corruption.
some may call it dictatorship, however enlightened but this is chopping and dicing logic for the sake of empty verbiage.

what is the jew world order that we are under today?
the exact, polar opposite, reducing the enlightened class by attrition and consigning it to the rubble of easily shaped and manipulated unthinking masses of humanoid biomass – the jew utopia.
yet, through their incessant lies and propaganda, they may refer to it as freedom and anarchy – so long as you don’t in the slightest offend the jew by not complying with his every wish.

Yes Pat, I stand corrected.
After all the Rothschild banking empire made their fortune in England by spreading the lie that Wellington had lost at Waterloo, thereby making millions on the stock exchange. However, that said, the Rothschild banking was still very much in its early stages of global domination, considering that by Waterloo it was only some 40 years old.

“freedom is for those who earned it through exercise of worthy intellect and adherence to a moral code.”

Complete disagree. Freedom is merely not being chained, in this case a system that takes ownership, unlawfully/illegally at the time of one’s birth. By stating that one has to ‘earn’ freedom implies captivity. People are free in anarchies and born free into anarchies Lobro.

Your argument is utterly totalitarian:

“the rest must be ruled by fear of punishment and incentive of rewards that a prosperous, well run society offers.”

Who gives you, or anyone for that matter, the right to rule over another human without their consent to do so? And who again gives you, or anyone, the right to institute fear upon another and punish them also?

Your argument reminds me of this little bit of totalitarianism by George Bernard Shaw:

“Under Socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well.”

What you fail to see is that National Socialism IS nothing different to a Jewish World Order. The only difference is, non Jewish psychopaths would be ruling the roost.

Your reply reeks of eugenics in your desire to build the perfect society. And again, who gives you the right how society should be?

You also fail to see that all goverments are ruled by psychopaths, for they naturally gravitate to positions of control. And in your National Socialist eutopia, Jews would still find a way to inflitrate it and rise to the top, just as they have throughout the centuries.
In an anarchy, there are no governments FOR psychopaths to attain positions of power. There would hopefully be no msm and academia either that Jews would also, naturally inflitrate in order to control.

You’ve stared far too long in the abyss Lobro and it’s stared back at you, turning you into that which you despise.

Freedom is freedom. You don’t earn freedom as it simply is. Sure people will have to fight for it, in order to create an anarchy, but fighting for freedom to impose another political ideology upon it, in your case national socialism is merely changing the gaoler and nothing more.

There was a good quote in Lord of the Rings from Gandalf to Frodo:

“There are many men that deserve death who live and many that deserve life who are dead. Can you give it to them Frodo?”

One of the reasons I stay away from TB and the msm is because it’s ultimately pushing society into accepting eugenics, that is deciding who should live and who should die. it’s elitism, tyranny, totalitarianism and oppression all wrapped up into one, nasty little word.

I hope lobro jumps into this little darkmoon debate, and all I would add, at least at this point, is that I view National Socialism within, say, a ‘training wheel’ frame of reference. Or say, one that attempts to undo alot of that which has been done that would understand a component of Freedom reflecting “freedom FROM”.

And I would be vehemently opposed to any practice of euthanasia other than one which would be under the heading of a mercy killing whose practitioners have exhausted all possibilities of eliminating physical pain in the person who would be killed. And one thing to keep in mind is that it was German scientists who invented morphine

psychos form a steady percenatge of any group and are predominant among jews.
given any opportunity, they will collude to deceive, swindle, rob, intimidate, harm and exploit the rest.

show me how anarchy prevents this from happening?
anarchy gives such well organized and motivated gangs all the freedom to wreak evil and havoc.
did not the protocols perceive this clearly and state it very forcefully as the single most powerful weapon in their arsenal toward world dominion?
there are literally dozens of gloating references to the sweet poisons of liberalism/anarchism, just do your own search, here is just one example in protocol 13

4. The part played by the liberals, utopian dreamers, will be finally played out when our government is acknowledged. Till such time they will continue to do us good service. Therefore we shall continue to direct their minds to all sorts of vain conceptions of fantastic theories, new and apparently progressive: for have we not with complete success turned the brainless heads of the GOYIM with progress, till there is not among the GOYIM one mind able to perceive that under this word lies a departure from truth in all cases where it is not a question of material inventions, for truth is one, and in it there is no place for progress. Progress, like a fallacious idea, serves to obscure truth so that none may know it except us, the Chosen of God, its guardians.

so make up your mind about this conundrum: jews say that liberalism is precisely their road to victory and you claim that it is precisely the road to vanquishing the threat, who is right?
(who has the track record of success in putting their theory to practice?)

if compared to an organism, anarchy is a system without any built-in immune defense.

and it is true, the immunity of the west has been long dead and the body itself is moldering and swarming with maggots, soon to be gone from the face of the earth.
or maybe you can show us by presenting a working, realistic roadmap of how anarchy can put an end to jew plague, maybe like asking the black death to please begone, ie, it is free to depart the body of the stricken victim..

useless truth is deadlier than a pernicious lie because it paralyzes the mind into apathetic inaction, whereas the latter at least offers hope of being spotted for what it is and countered.

example of the useless truth: when perfection is achieved, things will be perfect.
or as you seemed to have said at one point, in anarchy, everybody will be free to ignore jews (or something to the effect).
there are numerous analogues for this, eg, is a herd of cattle safer penned up inside corral and guarded by vicious dogs or are they better free out in the savanna where they have a chance to outrun wolves and lions? (or as you seem to intimate, there are no wolves and lions in a state of freedom, as if by some mirabile dictu, they are all gone, poof! who needs such nasty beasts in rapturous freedom of anarchy, no jews, no pedophiles, rapists, muggers, drug dealers, loonies, serial killers, because all people and animals are born good, and indeed internet is full of cute youtubes of cats and budgies making out and kissing lovingly, so it must be a truism – or at least the very bright and focused minds that apply the protocols would have you believe that)

i watched some documentary on how orcas hunt even the biggest white sharks, they slam into them sideways and flip them upside down, whereupon sharks go into a state of complete stupor and are easy prey for the whales … well, the sharks are free to struggle, fight back or escape, aren’t they, there is an ocean of freedom just out there, nothing to worry about.

moreover, anarchy is a sort of emulsifying process, under normal conditions it breaks up social groups into ever smaller and more individual units.

BUT … there is nothing in it inherently preventing the opposite from happening, namely clumping into tightly organized, opportunistic, predatory groups intent on exploiting these conditions to their parasitic advantage, since every obstacle to such dynamics has been intentionally removed under the guise of individualistic freedom.
these criminal organizations may well equate the concept of anarchy with “divide et impera” strategy, and why not, as far as they are concerned, the 2 are synonymous.

There can never be ‘anarchy’ as such. It cannot exist. It means without a leader. Someone always leads.

In the world of ordinary speech and common sense, anarchy certainly exists. It means the complete breakdown of order. Anarchy can certainly exist in a world of “leaders” — if the leaders are squabbling war lords who produce nothing but terror, confusion, tumult and the collapse of law and order.

This was the world of primitive man, according to the English philosopher Hobbes, who described daily life in such an anarchic world as “nasty, brutish, and short.”

People in positions of power, whether Jewish or goy are predominantly psychopaths. Considering Jews make up 0.2% of the world’s population and Caucasians around 17%, then there are far more Caucasian psychopaths than Jewish, but I would agree that there is a higher ratio of Jews to overall population than with Caucasians.

“given any opportunity, they [Jews] will collude to deceive, swindle, rob, intimidate, harm and exploit the rest.

show me how anarchy prevents this from happening?”

I’ve sated this over and over again why anarchy will prevent the Jewish World Order, however to the individual who isn’t careful, they will be deceived by the Jew.

You will say “well if the individual is deceived haven’t you just contradicted yourself?” and I will say no.

The main reason HOW the Jew will build his New World Order is through legislation and the judiciary and of course government, world government to be precise.
Now, Lobro, you will know that there is a huge difference between common law and case/civil law. The former is based on the bible and really a self preservation blueprint. The latter, on the other hand is ‘black’ law (not law but legislation), initially created for dealings with corporations and now moved into the realm of law and in doing so, huge deceiving of the public. It is contract law, there for the sole purpose of profiteering from the public by taking their moneys.

It is this way that the Jewish world order will succeed, because they will have their army of lawyers behind them to sue this man and that woman, to the future extremes of sneezing in a public place or passing wind on public transport.

Anarchy – no rule and law would mean that the Jew would not be able to pass the legislations (such as anti semitism legislation [not laws] and holocaust denial legislation [again not laws]). Anarchy would instantly destroy any authority that the Jew has. There would be no lawyers to implement Jewish perfidy because there would be no laws or legislation to enforce and defend.
By removing the government, then there is no one to implement your laws and dictate to the public what is and isn’t acceptable practice. There would be no agenda being followed in the schools, as there would be no governments to enforce it. And the same for the workplace also.

Therefore, to make an analogy, if you have a stagnant pool of water in your backyard and you want rid of the mosquitoes that are breeding there, all you do is drain the water. You want to remove the power of Jewry? Well you simply take away their means of that power.

And yes, I’m not denying that in an anarchy there would be well organized and motivated gangs but then communities would establish to stop them. These ‘well organized gangs’ wouldn’t come close to the mass murder currently being done by the west all around the world under their ‘war on terror’.

You’re also confusing liberalism with libertarianism. There are many branches within libertarianism. There is left, right and central libertarianism, just as there is socialism, liberalism and conservatism. Libertarianism is merely the upholding of liberty and I hate to say it, but your founding fathers, were libertarians and this was proven by their constitution. Libertarianism is minimal government and state authority. Anarchism is no government or state authority.

Lobro, I am not a libertarian. I am an anarchist.

You can guarantee that those living within an anarchy who are peaceful would NOT be the Jews and those wanting control and power would be the Jews, who would possibly use whatever wealth there was to fund their militias.
However, society is continually brainwashed into believing that anarchy is Mad Max, The Road and all other Hollywood created ‘Anarchy the bogeyman’ films. They have to continue programming the public into accepting government and state control in order for their advancement into world government.

“if compared to an organism, anarchy is a system without any built-in immune defense.”

And I am presuming that your ‘built in defence’ is the country’s armed forces?
Tell me Lobro, when was the last battle on American soil? When was the last battle on British soil? American Civil war and the Battle of Culloden in Scotland against the English.
From what I can see Lobro, the only aggression currently going on in this world is from the west. And while the west continues to bomb the crap out of other lands, it continues to bring in refugees of those lands, full of their hatred for us.
Armed forces, Lobro, were created for one purpose – to attack others. The first defensive armed forces were there to stop attack.

Lobro, you believe in governing and controlling human beings. I don’t.
You believe in government and state control over people. I don’t.
You believe in having armed forces. I don’t.
You believe the only way to defeat the Jews is a system of National Socialism to continue where Hitler failed. I don’t

I’ve told you many times on this forum that in order to defeat Judaism, you starve it of its means of power – government, msm, academia, judiciary, policing, armed forces. Under and anarchy you instantly destroy 4 out of 6 of them and the msm and academia therefore no longer become the mouthpieces of government as it no longer exists.
In your National socialist government all the above still exist and moreso, there is no way of stopping the influence of Jewry within those establishments because they will still control the money – and we know that the goyim are weak, as they happily go under their employ.

Yes, anarchy would be bloody…for a while, however, there would be no pitting Christianity against Islam and the war to end all wars. There would be no baiting Russia and China through persecution of Iran. There would be no armed forces with which to go off and invade, plunder and kill. There would be no judiciary to enforce Jewish laws of profit. In fact, case law would end overnight and with it Jewish control of the msm and academia. There would be no police to arrest people for telling the truth about the holocaust. Israel would crumble under a world anarchy. There would be no rebuilding of the Temple of Solomon. The Rothschild banking cabal would come crashing to the ground as the British monarchy would no longer exist along with the rest of the European ones too. The crown would be utterly smashed to pieces, along with it the City of London (financially, not physically). Secret societies, such as the freemasons would wither and die, for without a police force, they’d have no one to protect them.

Under an anarchy all that controls would no longer control. That’s really how simple this is Lobro.

Under an anarchy it would be a society of individualism NOT the group. Individualism is anathema to Jewish control through groupthink mentality.

You do not see the positives of anarchy because it means destroying the very foundations that Jews use against us – the system. You cannot envisage society without a system and therefore you submit yourself to its authority over you. I don’t. I was born free and I will continue to live free knowing the no human being/s have any right of authority over me unless I give my permission for them too. Anarchy is only true free state of existence for man and animal alike. Your system of government has already been proven to be easily corruptible and yet you still believe that it can be used to do good and sort out the world’s ills?

It’s interesting, on that note I’ll end this, but on my last point and you wishing to use the system to do good, is like Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings and the one ring. The one ring was created by Sauron to rule over all the others and it cannot be used to do good for it is the very essence, the very malice and hatred of Sauron. You can compare the one ring to the system/state/government. You can compare Sauron to Jewry/the powers that be/controllers of society. As long as the system remains, mankind will continue to be enslaved.

“it breaks up social groups into ever smaller and more individual units.”

Since monarchies hit the scene, the above was society amongst the world’s different people and cultures. Monarchies came in and united these groups together. Religion came in and united warring countries. Government came in and united yet more.
What has happened in society is the building of Babel….again. Like a sheepdog, guiding the sheep into the pen, this is what has happened with monarchy, religion and government, acting like the sheepdog to the sheep, but to the people. You cannot control people if scattered.

“BUT … there is nothing in it inherently preventing the opposite from happening….”

Of course not; after all, this is how we’ve got to the mess we’re in today. The only difference between then and now is that we’re wiser than we were then. We have technology to remind us of history and unlike then, our society is educated, well at least, far more than then.

My point is simply “how will Jews dominate this system, when their power base is destroyed? How will they control when they have no control on the msm and academia which will be free to publish the story of the Jews, without being arrested for anti semitism? How will they dominate when Israel crumbles once the holocaust is proven to be a lie?”

The Jew dominates by infiltrating the system and all institutions within society and from there enforcing his way of life on all others, dictating what is right and what is wrong. Remove that and the Jew is powerless.

Harbinger, I don’t see how you answered any of the critical points I raised, the main one having to do with the Jew’s own view, incorporated in The Protocols in great many places. I will not rerun my previous arguments because it is demeaning to both of us but will take a look at some other stuff you said.

By the way, I am quite sure that it was Jews who coined both the idea and the term, anarchy.

… an anarcho nationalist, just like my ancestors, the Scots and the Britons were
They were tribal hillbillies ruled by chieftains, were everyone knew everyone, what they were up to, who stole whose cow, so that such semi-anarchical rules were easy to set up, follow and enforce (however much the idea of enforcement conflicts with that of anarchy – this is the beginning of my argument)

Then you go on to list a whole bunch of points in favor of this state which I claim is a physical and social impossibility – anarchism, all claims starting with ”In an anarchy there would be no …”
Do you see what you are doing?
You are jumping the shark, having landed at your nirvana without any explanation of how to get there, like me arguing that anti-gravity represents the best, most efficient and comfortable means of transport (“an anti-gravity vehicle would not be subject to lateral forces going into a curve and could therefore never wipe out on ice”).

Suppose you say: “I, Harbinger from now on consider myself an anarchist and renounce all governments, laws and means of enforcing them”.
Fine, and I say: “I, Lobro, intend to use this assault rifle to raid some weaker guy’s compound and grab his women, gold and sheep and take them to my camp” and after seeing my success, other such men decide that banditry makes more sense than peaceful anarchism and soon there is violence all over the place.
But as long as you are a committed anarchist, there is nothing you can do because you tied your own hands and the only reaction possible is to renounce anarchy and start laying down law by whatever brutal means necessary.

This is something that Jews will never tell you, only snigger behind your back as you slip the cufflinks on your own wrists.
Anarchy is a self-negating philosophy, just like ye-olde-jewe-meme of “peaceful resistance”.
To get where you want to be, you must start walking the hard road, there is no teleportation.

One more point: ”You believe the only way to defeat the Jews is a system of National Socialism to continue where Hitler failed”
He nearly pulled it off, most certainly came as close or closer than anyone in history to solving the Judaic problem and showed the way to do it, despite the huge mistakes made, such as not trying hard to link up with Stalin and trying too hard to link up with backstabbing traitors in the West led by that dog, may he burn, Churchill as well as American excrement, FDR, Truman and Eisenhower … and many others.
And yet, the National Socialists came close to winning.

The Jew dominates by infiltrating the system and all institutions within society and from there enforcing his way of life on all others, dictating what is right and what is wrong. Remove that and the Jew is powerless.
Are you asking me to remove it? 🙂
Sure, call in the brownshirts.

The problem with the protocols, which point out that they will use the anarchists to wage their wars for them, is simply, how does one control that which won’t be controlled? Moreso, if people choose to be uneducated and manipulated into fighting a war [by the Jew] that isn’t theirs and worse to their overall detriment, then quite frankly, if this is the way society is envisaged and will become then the ‘goyim’ deserve it so.

Anarchism is NOT a physical and social impossibility. Anarchy is very much a possibility and a future reality for those who will fight for it.
Yes, your little scenario, is exactly what would happen, that I won’t deny, however….this scenario has already played out, many times before. What you are infact depicting is the self proclamation of kings (read psychopaths) who wish to parasite off of others, so they can have a comfortable, work free, luxurious existence, with no work involved whatsoever, with everyone running around after them at their beck and call.

This history is there for all to see. It’s up to the people to see what this is and decide they don’t want it. It’s up to them to stop this ongoing cycle Lobro. It’s about saying no. It’s about saying “I do not consent to any other human being having any authority over me whatsoever.” The point then follows; are you prepared to, as the Christians did, ‘turn the other cheek’ and allow people to walk all over you, or are you prepared to say no and fight back, i.e. – bullet, gun, aim at attacker and fire?

The only reason that law exists Lobro is because it’s enforced through a criminal gang by their police force. Who makes up the police force? The people do. If the people don’t join the police force, what then – get the army? And if people stop joining the army what then? Yes, the law is only as strong as the enforcers who enforce it. Destroy them, or simply stop the resupply and you stop the law.
I’m simply stating how anarchy could become Lobro. I however cannot speak for all men and women. Their freedom or slavery is their choice entirely.

And as for Hilter, I think that Napoleon came closer to solving the Jewish question. Unlike Hitler, Napoleon didn’t have the might of the Rothschild banking cabal to contend with. He had reigned in the Sephardim who had pretty much accepted French nationalism and status (albeit after being made ‘an offer they couldn’t refuse) and outwith the Jewish collective. What scuppered Napoleon was not heeding the warning, ironically, from the Sephardim, who spoke about their unease of the Ashkenazi of eastern Europe and Russia.
And as for trying to link up with Stalin, why, when international socialism is anathema of national socialism?

What???
Napoleon had to contend with Rothschild bankers at every turn. He hated them. He said no army should borrow money from bankers, because they become the leaders. The Rothschilds backed Wellington.

In 1803, instead of borrowing from the Rothschild bank, Napoleon sold territory west of the Mississippi, in America.

You are one helluva dreamer, Harbinger. But your anarchy creates a vacuum, and as we all know, life as we know it cannot exist in one, and in your dream it is filled most splendidly and incredibly unrealistically ESPECIALLY at this point in history, as in VERY late in the game

At THIS point in history the best that can be hoped for is for an anarchistic event to be in the form of a massive asteroid hitting the planet. Then, when the dust settles we’ll see if there’s anyone left to start ‘er up all over again!

Now that I think of it, isn’t there one out there passing close by as we speak?

Why such a facetious reply? One thing I’ve always respected about Lasha’s website forum is that the ‘overwhelming’ majority of posters are able to debate in a respectful manner, even though opposing one another’s point of view.

I am not an idealist. I’m a realist. I always have been and always will be.

To start off, anarchy is a very possible reality. A national socialist society is a surreality. I don’t know if many of you in the USA know of the British National Party (BNP) but they are a dead duck in the water. Their support base is predominantly made up of 50+ citizens. Stats state that the party membership is 500 people. This is British nationalism for you. Any party that gets remotely main stream with national views is buried. The latest party to feel this is the United Kingdom Independence Party, led by Nigel Farage. The Zionist lobby is doing their usual to end this party’s support brandishing Farage a racist, xenophobic, fascist, when he’s not even close.

Because of people’s research into Judaism, they all know very well about the New World Order and they know that it isn’t some ‘crackpot, tin-foil-hat wearing, conspiracy loon’s’ theory either.
The New World Order is putting its finishing touches to total control Brownhawk and people in the truth movement, STILL believe that they can use the very system to stop that which it was CREATED to create!

It is NOT possible to bring in a political party to stop this from happening. It is not possible to bring in a political party, outwith the usual three – conservatism, liberalism and socialism. All major parties in the UK, Europe and the USA ALL have one thing in common – a friend’s of Israel sub group within.

Now Brownhawk, I will spell this out very simply so you can understand the full gravity (and brevity) of this situation because it appears that people on here, like to call me a ‘dreamer’ when I’ve given the only plausible plan/course of society that needs to be taken to STOP the Jewish new world order from coming to fruition.

The situation is dire because our greatest enemy against this new world order IS NOT and I repeat IS NOT the Jews but ourselves. We work for, maintain and PROTECT the very system that is taking us into this socialist, totalitarian dystopia. The Jews tell us what to do. We don’t complain; we don’t ask questions; we just do it.
Our whole world is collapsing – morality, integrity, honesty, compassion, common courtesy and respect, that which was the old world order, all because we believed the propaganda fed to us daily via the msm and academia. It’s taken 60 years to destroy a reality that’s been here for millennia upon millennia.

The Jews are 13 bloody million for crying out loud! You all continually blame them, when you fail to see that it’s the Caucasians, the Asians and Negroes who are implementing their wishes! If people DIDN’T obey their commands and absorb their propaganda and indoctrination, then society WOULD not be as it is today. It is this way because we are all incredibly weak to stand up and say NO! The churches are failing you, made up predominantly of whites. The msm is failing you, made up of predominantly of whites. Academia is failing you, made up of predominantly whites. Government is failing you, made up of predominantly whites. The armed forces are failing you, made up of predominantly whites. The police are failing you, made up of predominantly whites. And you still blame the Jew that gives the orders, when you should be turning around and telling them where to get off!

The NWO is merely a matter of decades away, if not far sooner. Here in the UK, we have two heirs to the throne who are Jews. We have a prime minister and a prime minister in waiting who are Jews. We have a mayor of London who’s a Jew. A media controlled by Jews. A judiciary controlled by Jews….. And somehow, somehow, people on here think that we’ll somehow be able to get a political party in there to warn society of the ‘Jew’ problem. And you call me a dreamer?????

My post is NOT that long. It only takes about a minute to read it. I didn’t send you a 40 volume set of encyclopedias to read and “moderate” to make sure it’s “worthy” of your erudite commentary board. Just put the post on the board and we both then can call it a day.

The two hour limit is up. I even gave you more than two hours to decide. That’s how considerate I am.

UNCLE TOBY:

[1] Listen up good, Joe. You have no negotiating powers. You don’t give me “two hours to decide” for the simple reason I am often away from my computer for 4-6 hours during the day and for 8-10 hours every night. So during that time NO POSTS are read by me. And the only comments posted are those that go through automatically. Understand?

[2] I will choose ONE post a day and post it, as promised, but I will choose it. Not you. So far you have sent me nothing I wish to post. All your posts are irrelevant, off-topic, and needlessly offensive. We have no wish to hear your thoughts on Karen T. Okay? She is not important. Think about a worthier subject to discuss and we will post it.

[3] We won’t count this post as your one post of the day. Continue posting. If you send in TWO posts worth posting, both will be posted.

[4] Please don’t continue wasting my time. And thank yourself I am patient and fair. Most other websites would have banned you long ago. So be grateful you are given a little niche on this extraordinary website where even intellectual lepers are welcome — PROVIDED THEY ABIDE BY CERTAIN RULES!

I think the restriction of ONE post a day for you is eminently fair and just. Most other sites would have banned you long ago! You have been booted off several other sites, I understand, including therebel.org. So you should consider it a privilege and an honor that one site at least — this one! —is willing to put up with you on their terms.

You have have been given a generous allowance of 1000 words a day, far more than the average poster can manage to post in a single day. How you can complain about that beats me! Even the BEST posters here, and I could name many, don’t need 1000 words to make their point.

Pat can say in 10 words what you can’t say even in 1000! He has the knowledge, the skill, and the savoir-faire that allows him to make terse and informative comments in a friendly and inoffensive way. Frankly, you don’t.

The same of course applies to Lobro and several other brilliant posters here. They don’t NEED to be restricted for the simple reason that they know how to behave properly.

If you were NOT put under restrictions, every second post would be yours. It would be an intolerable situation. You would be hogging the limelight and creating endless disruptions and distractions.

Think carefully about these wise words written today by one of this site’s most outstanding posters. They apply to YOU in particular:

LOBRO
January 22, 2015 at 5:05 pm

Consider the simplified example of dogs: should they be let loose to run around and enjoy being dogs?

yes, for those of kind disposition, good temper, training and intelligence, who know where to do their business in designated dog poo zones and so on.

TOBY: WE POST THIS ON BEHALF OF TYRON PARSONS WHO HAS JUST SENT US THIS ANGRY EMAIL:

That was the perfect reply by Sardonicus who quotes Lobro — for it sums up the uber hypocrisy of your site perfectly. I couldn’t have prayed for a better reply.

I am sure he nor Lobro will be punished but if Joe or I wrote the same type of thing, advocating the same solution they do for those we don’t like the hammer would be swift to come down on our “bad behavior”. It’s always ok for your Lefitsts, Feminists, Marxists- Moslems and “Jews” to be aggressive and poop anywhere they want but GOD FORBID a white person, a rightist or Christian does even in defense.

Does your hypocrisy have any bounds?

Sardonicus engages in aggressiveness that he says he opposes in others advocating for special, extra rights for those posters he does likes and quotes Lobro who advocates genocide as a justified solution toward those neither like.

holy mackerel, toby, he outed us!
he called us SPADES and anti-christian ones no less, what we gonna do?
i told you we should have been more careful when flying under the radar.

lemme see if my peacekeeping act still works:
how about you follow joe’s ploy and call yourself realorvaginaltyron?

then you can copypaste million word posts with I AM and all, with some ruminations on cheese aging techniques and what you learned while observing our resident women/leftists/feminists showering, singing internationale in yiddish.

and now that we are onto the subject of occult, let me in on a deep, dark secret, lean a little bit closer and don’t breathe on me, internet makes me paranoid … what do you get when you turn “iii707” upside down?
LOL!!!

yep, i told you toby, he smoked us, there is no rum for us SPADES to run and hide, so just be nice to him and offer drinks and ukrainian puta cheese on the house.

TOBY: Tyron Parsons has challenged me to post this comment on his behalf, so I do:

Administration

I didn’t ask you to post my [LAST] email to you did I? And since when did you acquire the magic ability of being able to determine my authentic emotional state by way of my printed words? Did I use obscene language? Did I call for others genocide like they did me? Nope lol.

I am not nor was I angry when I wrote that email. I was laughing while writing it but what else should one expect of those who habitually assign false emotions and meanings to others words because they can’t beat their arguments.

I surmise that Hitler was a control op but there may well have been an element of high ranking Nazis who broke with the “corrupt” element and took over base 211.

Call me crazy but I do believe the Nazi’s made it to the moon in 42 and Mars in 45 through one of the Hannubu anti gravity discs. I think they did create an all ethnically “Aryan” city in Antarctica and may have colonies on the Moon and Mars. Why else do we see structures on both the Moon and Mars with huge Swastikas painted on top?

You’ve gotta be kidding me! 🙂
As smart as you are, do you REALLY think Hitler & Company made it to the MOON!!!????

Anyhow, I awakened for a while and decided to check-in, here, and I have considered your suggestion of calling (T.H.E.M.) ‘Talmudists’. I know Jews who I like very much (and, of course, I DO know they reflect a ‘difference’), so I feel hypocritical casting blanket condemnation using that name. From now on, it’s ‘Talmudist’ for me (unless Lasha & Co. suggest otherwise).

(Now don’t go and start debating the ‘crazy’ prospect. Be content that you are in very good company, considering the designation…)

Audrey Meadows was a cute little thing, wasn’t she? Of course, I don’t even think I was BORN, yet, when that show was made – but it was on TV when I was a child – and I have seen it, occasionally, recently. It is interesting to compare today’s actresses with yesterday’s. The old ones are the best ones. I guess Nicole Kidman is my favorite now living.. Maybe there are some others – but I can’t quickly think of their names because I don’t watch TV that often, now.

I was in high school when parents bought first TV. Had to make our own toys and games. Mean games ruled.
Old TV antennae made really great blow-guns. Darts were matchsticks with needles wrapped with thread and glued with clear nail polish at point end…and cotton wadding at other end, wrapped with thread. Highly accurate to 20-30 ft.

Watched TV at night once a week down at the TV at the repair shop, which had one on display in front window and speakers outside. Bought ice cream at drug store next door. Sat on hood of cars that pulled up, weather permitting. Weather not permitting… stayed home and had paper-wad fights. Paper-wads made from rolled up paper with foiled backing from cigarette packs could leave a mark for days. We wanted to draw blood….. showed a good hit. Had to hold in hollering…lest position given away.

Talk about good fights… Musoke the larger Negro Swedish fighting hero just got the crap beat out of him by a TOUGH white Russian Tumenov in Stockholm’s UFC just now. Record 30,000+ in attendance. Gustaffsen fights later tonite. Will be good. Hope he wins against his Negro opponent from USA.

Hey Butterfly Wings de la Madame, kabuki girl, tell Gilbert the truth now, you’re not being honest with Gilbert, tell Gilbert you stink like a fat smelly red heifer jew cow “messiah” then Huntly will LUV you for the rest of eternity! Why break Gilbert’s heart with falsities when the truth is so uplifting!

But but but, Tyron, Hitler and the Knotsies didn’t have Einstein. Mucho Kuku says we can travel back in time through a wormhole, but deafeningly mum on gravity. Obviously, your mockers don’t know what flimsy conjectures pop science is built on. They build castles on foundations of manure. I’d venture to say that true scientific inquiry died with the Knotsies.

What’s a mirror? A mirror changes the phase of the frequency of light. Forms have been seen in mirrors that weren’t visible to the natural eye because their frequency is phased so many degrees above or below top dead center of the frequency of your perception. Cameras too, but cameras smear the top dead centers, making other forms appear vague. What did they do at the Philadelphia experiment? It’s not out of the possibilities of the laws of physics to phase the impulsive force of gravity to a propulsive force, or no force at all. That phenomenon is at work in every globe hung in the heavens. They’re hollow. Not to mention the proof in the motions of the UFOs. Looks like Elijah wasn’t bullshitting Elisha. By this logic, I expect that the spirit body co-exists with the flesh body, but at a phased frequency. When the top dead centers are near, you get a quickening, charisma, a lake of fire shining inside like I see in those lovely Christian virgin girls. Maybe I’m bumbling around in the dark again, but it’s more satisfying than being obedient to a world of lies, head to toe. I’ll be outfitting my shop to try these very things.

Blogs are doomed to never get off the ground. To quote the guy who wrote the words of Solomon, but wasn’t Solomon because Solomon didn’t exist: One fly spoils the whole gallon of perfume. That’s what a guy who wasn’t Solomon, but said he was Solomon said, I clarify in the interest of not offending any precious sensitivities. By that, you should know that blogs are just too easy to sabotage. There is a slobbering, twitching, jerking spaz, amped up on hydergine with no other purpose on every blog, lying in wait with that fly. What can look like a spontaneous response of many is often an executed attack according to a plan, or there is no such thing as hasbaras. Remember that ‘tirathites’ means ‘loudmouths’. It’s how they derail. One function of the scribes of 1 chr 2:55. Don’t get personally entangled and don’t underestimate how important it is for them to control the dialogue. It’s life or death for them. They love it when they get a person committed to fighting their inane mythologies, because it’s a waste.

My Dad asked me to post this here so people would know why he isn’t coming back. He told me that the only way he would return is if he was taken completely off of any restrictions and recognized as having equal rights to other posters. Until that time he wishes that everyone here consider these points that he believes were the basis for his being persecuted/censored.

If one is going to punish certain people for using obscene language, then they ought to punish all who use obscene language.
If one is going to allow certain people to post 8, 300 words posts in a day, then they ought not punish the one who posts 3, 800 word posts a day.
If one is going to allow multiple leftists, Marxist and a Moslem to gang up and attack one rightists, then they ought to allow that one rightist to attack all of his or her attackers.
If one is going to allow non whites to ostracize whites based on their race, then they ought to allow whites to ostracize non whites based on their race.
If one is going to allow Moslems to praise other Moslems who raped thousands of pubescent white girls, then they ought not punish those who call the Moslem a goat fucker, for surely that is less of a crime than advocating child rape.
If someone is going to be punished for attacking someone’s vagina and femininity, then those who attack men’s penis’, balls and masculinity should be punished the same
If one is going to punish someone because a women was offended, then they should punish women if they offend a man.
If one is going to punish someone for offending a Moslem, then one should punish Moslems if they offend Christians
And most of all, if one is going to allow someone to call for the murder of other posters, then they sure as hell shouldn’t keep ANYONE in their little supervised, limited posting dunce chair jail cell as an “example” to others of “bad behavior”

If you switched to a free speech site you wouldn’t have these problems. So, either you lay out exactly what you stand for and won’t allow and then suck up all the hypocrisy you will be guilty of or you limit all people to a number of words and posts and let them speak how they wish.

As a Royal Edict the decree of King Edward 1 having never been repealed by subsequent Kings and Queens of England stands valid today as it did then.

The trick Cromwell used to get a government to overturn the edict was based on the presumption that the “Torah forbids the eating and drinking of any form of blood”, of course it does as it should, but he neatly concealed the fact that the very same Jews swear on the unholy Talmud a filthy book that encourages every vile act conceivable, as is to be expected for a book authored from Hell. Today Torah Jews go to great pains to differentiate themselves from the talmudic Jews and why is the establishment scared of charging them with the anti-semitism tag ?
They burn Israeli flags, they join ‘Zionism is Racism’ marches, they invalidate the State of Israels’s existence on Jewish religious grounds and so forth hence why is there nary a charge against them ? If you didnt know it is because they hold the upper moral hand in this matter so no one dares challenge them. As I said Cromwell twisted the truth on the simple fact that these Jews are not the law-abiding Jews of the Torah and were this issue to be reopened and debated today with full glare placed on the Talmud then I firmly believe the Jew will certainly be banished from this planet.

Hence were I English I could always take comfort from whatever ‘anti-semitism’ attitudes I may harbor against Jews, a people banished from my King’s realm, a people with a history of countless expulsions and banishments from numerous continents to serve as proof of their inability to live with other races in peace and harmony, and a people who used cunning and deceit to creep back into mmy land as if nothing had happened. Ah but the English are a tolerant people.

While on this subject I am dismayed that every strengthening of anti-semitism laws and regulations invariably leaves me an Arab, a semite, at the other receiving end, as an anti-semitic offender. If not anti-Arab per se then at least anti-Islamic while everyone conviniently forgetting that of the almost 400 million people of Semitic origin we Arabs form the largest of all, like 300 million Arabs whereas the next in numbers is only 22 millions, them being our brothers the Amharic and at slot 3 is the Hebrew at 7 million.

I wish you all courage and please do not fear for inasmuch as a dark storm or a nightmare persists but for a while then know that all these treacheries being sprung on us too will fade and pass away and we shall remain.

” wish you all courage and please do not fear for inasmuch as a dark storm or a nightmare persists but for a while then know that all these treacheries being sprung on us too will fade and pass away and we shall remain.” : Inch-Allah!
Yes, maybe the “anti-semitic” card should be used against the usurpers, by the true semites..

Thank you for your praise and respecting my point of view and likewise, however, I take my stance on Islam because it is a stance that must be taken.

of course, I do realise that tptb are using Islam as the boogeyman. I do realise that they are trying to create hatred within the west of Islam and Muslims. I see all of that Save the Goyim.
What I also see is that which many people do not see. I also very much believe in learning from history and in this case, the time of Muhammad, his creation of Islam, his invasion of non Islamic lands and the enforcing of Islam upon them. This is written in the Qur’an and hadith. I know this, for I’ve read it. Islam did not spread through peace. I’m not saying that Christianity didn’t, but Islam is very much a warrior religion, unlike Christianity. After all, Muhammad was a warlord who when realising that Islam could not be spread peacefully, decided to band together a small army and start enforcing it upon many.

I also look to the Ottoman empire and the invasion of Europe in the middle ages. This is a part of history, which is very true.

I lived in London and I experienced first hand Muslims, telling me that I can’t walk in the area I was, because it was only for Muslims. Remember this is in London, England.

People who are fighting against what is to be; those who are fighting against Jewry and their planned multicultural/multiracial agenda; people who are fighting against the implementation of the New World Order, in their ignorance forget simply that Islam IS NOT just a religion, but a culture and a way of life. Those who seriously believe that as Islam grows in non Muslim lands, it will not push for control are truly deluded individuals. They will do so because they believe, naturally, that their way of life is better than those whose lands they live in, for if they didn’t they wouldn’t be practising Muslims.

I respect all world cultures, peoples and religions. However, what I do see is civil strife that’s created by aliens with their alien culture living in lands not of their ancestry and culture. I see very much Islam being the Emmanuel Goldstein of the 21st century, but I also see that Islam should live in Islamic lands. The very reason why there is the problem there is today is because Jews have promoted Muslims into the west through economic reasons and refugee-ism.

I have met many Muslim people in London. I made friends of them, but I am not ignorant to realise that a Muslim will enforce his way of life upon another, when he has the population to do so. This is simply cause and effect. They are Muslim because they see it as the only true way to live life. They will do their best to make others see this also. They do not do it through malice, but simply because they see no better way of life than Islam.

“Islam has spread today in the west because of the agenda to flood the west with them. If you stop this and repatriate these Muslims to their lands then guaranteed, they’re not going to rise up in arms to wage a holy Jihad.”

You seem like a mighty fine bloke and I appreciate your point of view, Mr. Harbinger. The only thing I can add at this point is that it’s hard for some of us to understand why you’re buying into the boogey man of “Islamic Jihadism,” which as all thinking people know is basically a manufactured pretext that opens the way for the depopulation (largely through military invasion) of land that was earmarked many years ago as the future boundaries of “eretz yisroel.” If you’d like to delineate your reasons for holding onto this popular yet misguided belief, it would be most greatly appreciated.

Lobro is apparently one of the few message posters in this forum who doesn’t appear to be buying into media-created myth of “Islamic Jihadism.” It should be fairly obvious that the whole “jihad thing” was kicked off in 1972 with a false-flag attack at the Munich Olympics, and has snowballed over time into the mess that we’re in today. It was never a problem before the ’72 Olympics, i.e. unless you regard the King David Hotel bombing as having been the work of “Islamic Jihadis.”

Sadly, although Tyron had his moments with it, he can never quite grasp the satirical flair long enough to sustain the keenness of its delicate irony. Instead, and without realizing it, he succumbs to the bitterness that satire would allay in the face of an absurd world.

Oh, you guessed that I am the Marquis!
Menefee is a derivative of the old English, Minifie.
London is lovely in the winter, as I lerv eating fine wood and courting fine women.
The latter, tho, could hardly be called ladies.
Our Jews are making belive they are runnin’ scared and demanding protection.
Most of the aristocracy over here have some Yid blood, as they have settled into my top 2% of the social strata.
My family has remained Jew free for over 600 years; and I am not liked because of this.
I have placed my dwindling fortune in a non-Jewish bank in Switzerland; and it is managed by one of my women/lackeys in Zurich. Goin there next week to romance and then to Paris to watch the Jewish charade.
Wot you doin’ about 9/11, Sandy Hook etc, and the BIG one planned for soon.
Don’t argue so much among yaselves; as the Jewish elite likes this kind of dialecticism.
Brownhawk continues ti impress, and I will be over to take over a chieftain role in the cumin insurgency – WHEN yo reach the tipping point of 15%!

You can now 100% conclude that Charlie Hebdo and its subsequent #JeSuisCharlie campaign are Israeli special operations, aided by their circumcised poodles in France, England, USA et al. They benefit first and foremost.

[I had to look up the word “circumcised” and discover that 1/3 of all males in the world are subjected to this unnecessary horror & Jewish child abuse and terror.]

Seems to be a lull in reader comments coming in. I guess everyone is back stage : Costume change. The show will resume after Costume change. Stay in your seats. “We’ll” be right back!”

Go easy on the kabuki make-up. Too much kabuki make-up is way too obvious. In acting many times, subtle is much better, more believable. And lobro, please try NOT to ham-it up too much today. You’re stealing the Spot Light from so many other of your fellow talented actors in the darkmoon ensemble.

HINT FOR POSTING: I live in a different time zone, 5 hours ahead of you. So every comment you post AFTER 6 pm your time (11 pm where I live) will not be read by me until the NEXT day. In other words, best not to post anything after 6 pm your time if you want to see it posted on the same day.

If you’re 5 hours ahead of me in here in California, that means you’re somewhere out of the United States. So then, where exactly is your Darkmoon office?

TOBY:

(1) Listen, Joe. I live in England which is exactly 5 hours ahead of the EAST coast of America. I assumed you lived in New York or somewhere on the East coast of the US. Most of my friends/relatives live in Toronto which is also 5 hours behind English time.

(2) If you live in California, then you are exactly EIGHT hours behind me. Here is the world clock. Take a look at the time in LONDON and compare it to the time in LOS ANGELES. When it’s 4 pm in Los Angeles, it’s 12 midnight in London.

(3) This will be a useful guide to you. If you post a comment at 4 pm in Los Angeles, it’s going to be 12 midnight in London. I’m in bed at that time. I go to bed between 11 and 12 pm. So any comments that get posted in California after 3-4 pm are not going to be seen or approved by me until the NEXT DAY. Get it?

(4) OK, it’s almost MIDNIGHT here now. So I’m turning in for the night. It’s now almost 4 pm where you are according to the world clock.

(5) Stop blathering on about the West coast of Africa! We’ve never been there! We are located on the south of England.

(6) This comment is timed at 8.53 pm MY time, so you must have posted it at 12.53 (afternoon) in California. It’s now exactly midnight here.

Jeeeeesuz H. Christ almighty! Don’t you people have a ball game to watch or something? Come on, let’s all get into the proper mindset! SEA – Hawks! SEA – Hawks! Or why not grab an issue of People Magazine and immerse yourself in the type of “literature” that caters to these type comments. On what is obviously a far less important note, I am appalled at the French and British reaction to the tempest in Charlie’s Yarmulke. When will the gullible gyoim wake up? Not any time soon if the comments here are any indication.

How true are Pandora Pushkins thoughts on the criticism of Jews–which one must not do ever. To call someone Jewish is highly offensive. To dislike Israel is, of course, anti-Semitism. And if one should form a private opinion that may equate Judaism/Zionism with criminality and mass murder then keep your mouth shut and your thoughts to yourself. But if you should step across the invisible line and criticize the wrong people then the first response will be the generalization from the specific. Israel’s bloody rampage through Gaza is not worth criticizing in the world of bloody rampages that barely evoke a yawn so why are we singling out Gaza’s carnage and ignoring the others–anti-semiticism. And if one brings up the bloody rule of Jewish Bolshevism then that person will be accused of anti-semitism because as wikipedia says the Jews were a tiny minority in Russia that by the way endured much suffering under the Tsar with such dignity. Anti-Semitism like Jewish guilt is not comprehensible so don’t even try it because you can’t win on this one.

Jewish guilt is also nearly impossible to comprehend because it never will be about anything clearly identifiable like the above mentioned atrocities or even some more common infraction like verbal abuse or criminal behavior. No Jewish guilt is ontological in nature as Freud explained in Moses and Monotheism. It has to do with either the desire to kill God or guilt over having done so. Think about it: out of all the people in the world God chose the chosen and they ungratefully committed God murder. The guilt is so overwhelming that there is no room for any more guilt, like in a computer low on gigabytes. Therefore, along with banishing any thought of criticism of Jews from your deranged mind, also do not wait around for any apologizes about anything from an unpaid loan, to verbal abuse, to fingers in the cookie jar. No criticism, and no remorse. Got it. It’s a waste of time. So NOW how are we suppose to ignore these folks and so we can have something of a life on this planet. That is the only solution–ignore them as much as possible.

I’m curious, Pat, as how exactly the Germans could have such an astounding and successful space program at a time Germany was fighting a very intense war on two sides and was up against some VERY formidable foes : The USA, The UK, and The Soviet Union. At a time the Germans needed all the resources they possibly could scrap-up to fight on two fronts against Very formidable foes. Plus, the Allies were carpet bombing Germany almost every night of the war. So you’re saying the Germans were able to build such an astoundingly successful space program in the time between 1933 and 1939-1940. Is that what you’re saying?

[1] Thank you for using the SAME user name every time you post a comment. If you do this, you will probably be rewarded by having your post appear at once AUTOMATICALLY. Though it might go into automatic monitoring sometimes if it triggers a key word. This is beyond our control, and you must not think you are being censored or monitored if this happens to you. It is totally automatic.

[2] If you keep changing your USER NAME constantly, the computer is programmed to regard you as a spammist. Your comments will then disappear into the SPAM box and be AUTOMATICALLY DELETED later on. This is again beyond our control. If you don’t want your posts to be spam-boxed, PLEASE CHOOSE ONE USER NAME AND STICK TO IT! Do NOT use SOCK PUPPETS or you will end up in SPAM! Thank you. (Toby)

North Korea is a prison camp experiment by TPTB…..
….to see the minimum subsistence needed for production and obedience.
The Stockholm Syndrome is evident in the whole country, not just a hotel.
It is working just fine.

As mind-controlled goyim we must reserve our greatest level of admiration for the twisted tales of debauchery that are contained in the manual of depravity that’s known as the jewish torah in addition to all of the lesser books that are collectively known as the “chumish.” The old testament is absolutely jam-packed with a virual smorgasbord of “precious beauty” like the jewish comic book hero “David” going out and killing a bunch of nameless goyim after which he performs a post motem “brit milah” on their decaying carcasses, cutting off their foreskins and giving them as a dowry to give to King Saul in exchange for the king’s daughter. etc. etc.