[Histonet] Fwd: Hale's Colloidal Iron

From:

WWmn916@aol.com

--part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_boundary
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_alt_boundary"
--part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_alt_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Greetings everyone,
I've noticed a few times, here and there, when someone would ask what the=20
difference was with the Hales colloidal iron vs. any other (Mueller-Mowry fo=
r=20
example) procedure.=A0 I'm not sure if I missed any responses that may expla=
in the=20
differences especially when the procedures look so very similar.=A0 The only=
=20
difference I can tell is a water rinse step and a different counterstain.=
=A0 It's=20
just when a doctor request a colloidal fe and that it has to be Hales ....I=20
still know this nagging question continues to bug me.=A0 I wish I could just=
be a=20
little clearer on this.=A0 It seems like the Mueller-Mowry would also stain=20=
for=20
renal carcinoma and the only difference being the name of the procedure, a=20
water rinse and counterstain difference.=A0 Why are doctors so adamant about=
the=20
Hales when it comes to renal carcinoma?
Thanks so much,
Sincerely
Deb King, HT
Sacramento, CA=A0=20
--part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_alt_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Greetings everyone,
I've noticed a few times, here and there, when someone would ask what the di=
fference was with the Hales colloidal iron vs. any other (Mueller-Mowry for=20=
example) procedure.=A0 I'm not sure if I missed any responses that may expla=
in the differences especially when the procedures look so very similar.=A0 T=
he only difference I can tell is a water rinse step and a different counters=
tain.=A0 It's just when a doctor request a colloidal fe and that it has=
U> to be Hales ....I still know this nagging question continues to bug me.=
=A0 I wish I could just be a little clearer on this.=A0 It seems like the Mu=
eller-Mowry would also stain for renal carcinoma and the only difference bei=
ng the name of the procedure, a water rinse and counterstain difference.=A0=20=
Why are doctors so adamant about the Hales when it comes to renal carcinoma?=

Thanks so much,
Sincerely
Deb King, HT
Sacramento, CA=A0
--part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_alt_boundary--
--part1_bf.35000451.2c72d6a5_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-path:
From: WWmn916@aol.com
Full-name: WWmn916
Message-ID: <12d.2f6090d1.2c6faccc@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 11:50:36 EDT
Subject: Hale's Colloidal Iron
To: histonet@pathology.swmed.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part2_bf.35000451.2c6faccc_boundary"
X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6014
--part2_bf.35000451.2c6faccc_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Greetings everyone,
I've noticed a few times, here and there, when someone would ask what the
difference was with the Hales colloidal iron vs. any other (Mueller-Mowry for
example) procedure. I'm not sure if I missed any responses that may explain the
differences especially when the procedures look so very similar. The only
difference I can tell is a water rinse step and a different counterstain. It's
just when a doctor request a colloidal fe and that it has to be Hales ....I
still know this nagging question continues to bug me. I wish I could just be a
little clearer on this. It seems like the Mueller-Mowry would also stain for
renal carcinoma and the only difference being the name of the procedure, a
water rinse and counterstain difference. Why are doctors so adamant about the
Hales when it comes to renal carcinoma?
Thanks so much,
Sincerely
Deb King, HT
Sacramento, CA
--part2_bf.35000451.2c6faccc_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Greetings everyone,
I've noticed a few times, here and there, when someone would ask what the di=
fference was with the Hales colloidal iron vs. any other (Mueller-Mowry for=20=
example) procedure. I'm not sure if I missed any responses that may ex=
plain the differences especially when the procedures look so very similar.&n=
bsp; The only difference I can tell is a water rinse step and a different co=
unterstain. It's just when a doctor request a colloidal fe and that it=
has to be Hales ....I still know this nagging question continues to=20=
bug me. I wish I could just be a little clearer on this. It seem=
s like the Mueller-Mowry would also stain for renal carcinoma and the only d=
ifference being the name of the procedure, a water rinse and counterstain di=
fference. Why are doctors so adamant about the Hales when it comes to=20=
renal carcinoma?