If a player you dislike wins a lot of Slams, the time when he did so is referred to as a "mug era".
If a player you dislike enters a lot of 250's/500's and wins them, they are a vulture. If they lose, they just plain suck.

Expert opinion on past tennis does not require any actual experience of the said era.

Every Nadal victory outside of Roland Garros occurs after the courts are slown down.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SliceAce

As for Mugray, what can be said? A disgusting human being, and awful player, and a choking pushing mug. He looks like a kemo patient, bald spots, hairless legs, pasty blotchy skin, busted teeth, and an ugly, snarling face. Typical antics all came out in this match: faking injuries, grimacing and cursing, trying to peg Fed, trying to start drama, undeserved final based on an exhausted old man and a joke draw.

I'm no Fakervic fan but he needs to save tennis, sadly tree trunk legs will be fresh. Interesting he's never questioned....