Robert Spencer, Bruce Thornton and Nonie Darwish on The Glazov Gang

Robert Spencer, Bruce Thornton and Nonie Darwish recently joined The Glazov Gang to discuss the Islamic war on free speech in America. The first part of this three-part series is below. We will run Part II in tomorrow’s issue:

Excellent discussion! Glad to finally see Robert Spencer on the show! Clearly, too many of us here in the U.S. are complacent in the face of CAIR's campaign of intimidation. The recent case with Kramer Levin (the NYC law firm that withdrew its permission for Spencer's talk) is only the latest example, but sadly, this is an all-too-common pattern. Because of the laziness that Robert describes on the part of the individuals targeted by CAIR, as well as the media, many Americans are not aware of the fact that this organization is actively practicing stealth jihad. Nor are they aware that the Muslim Brotherhood in America has strong ties to terrorist organizations. People such as these guests MUST start to be heard more widely if the U.S. is to avoid the fate of Europe and the U.K.

wpage11

Why don't all these brilliant people find a way to convert even one or two powerful liberal Democrats, or persons in the highest levels of US Gov't ? . Sometimes throughtout history It has taken only one leader to effect the most major change for good. We are in a battle -good versus evil. We must win.
Willis Page

Can Dr. Spencer tell us how an LDS Romney is superior to a Pro-Israel Perry?

……Be mindful of that for which you wish………..

Rio Linda translation: "Be Careful What You Wish For!"

Many would accept a flawed Perry over Mittens Romney; in a Salt Lake minute!

ObamaYoMoma

Can Dr. Spencer tell us how an LDS Romney is superior to a Pro-Israel Perry?

I doubt it because he isn't a religious bigot like you.

Moreover, half wit, when it comes to understanding the nature of the threat the West faces from Islam, all of the current crop of Republican Party candidates are incompetent. Every last one of them. In fact, as for as I can tell, all political elites on both sides of the political spectrum are completely incompetent when it comes to protecting and defending America from the scourge of Islam. Perry, however, was more incompetent and gullible than most. He was also against fencing off the border, probably because he is being paid off, and like Newt he is an amnesty supporter too.

Many would accept a flawed Perry over Mittens Romney; in a Salt Lake minute!

Perry was a mentally incompetent loon and Mitt Romney, a LDS member no less, single handily destroyed Rick Perry's campaign in the debates because Rick Perry continued trying to attack him in successive debates until he finally learned to leave Romney alone, but fortunately not until after the damage had already been done. He was a glutton for punishment and didn't know how to keep his stupid mouth shut. Indeed, he deserved what he got.

By the way, moonbat, I hate to rain on your unhinged parade, but Romney, like Perry, Gingrich, and Santorum too and unlike that loon Paul, is also a fervent supporter of Israel as well. However, unfortunately just like all the other Republican Party candidates for president he is also totally incompetent when it comes to understanding the threat the world faces from Islam.

Oh, by the way, probably because virtually all Middle East Studies Departments throughout Europe and the USA have been hijacked and co-opted by a cabal of delusional leftists and Muslim covert and deceptive non-violent jihadists infiltrators funded by OPEC petro-dollars, Spencer isn't a doctor.

ObamaYoMoma

While I agree with Robert Spencer on practically everything regarding Islam and in fact his scholarship has been instrumental in building my own knowledge of Islam, I nevertheless disagree with him when he mischaracterizes what is really violent jihad in the cause of Allah as being terrorism. Since first of all, that lets Islam off the hook as being the culprit, as terrorism, in stark contrast to jihad, is perpetrated by members of all ethnic groups, societies, cultures, and civilizations, whereas jihad, on the other hand, which is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme, is an Islamic manifestation only.

Meanwhile, terrorism can be perpetrated for any number of political causes, while jihad unlike terrorism can only be in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme. Additionally, terrorism, as its name implies can only constitute violence, while jihad, which constitutes total warfare incorporates both violent and non-violent means of jihad.

As a matter of fact, covert and deceptive non-violent jihad, such as mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of mass Muslim infiltration and stealth demographic conquest, is employed by the Islamic world against the West astronomically far more prevalently and actually constitutes an exponentially far greater threat to the peace and security of the West relative to violent jihad.

In fact, one of the biggest reasons that covert and deceptive non-violent jihad is able to take place today throughout the West completely below the radar and totally uncontested and unopposed is exactly because, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, jihad, which again incorporates both violent and non-violent means of jihad, is always conflated as being terrorism, which again can only be violent. Hence, because covert and deceptive non-violent jihad, such as mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of mass Muslim infiltration and stealth demographic conquest, by design isn't violent, it isn't construed as being terrorism, and if it isn't construed as being terrorism, then it isn't resisted or opposed

Of course, the prevailing accepted false PC multicultural myth whereby Islam is thought to be a so-called Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists and the vast overwhelming majority of Muslims in the world are thought to be peaceful and moderate people, which is due to mass Muslim infiltration, by the way, doesn't help matters either.

Hence, I agree with him when he characterizes CAIR, ISNA, and other Muslim Brotherhood Front Groups as being covert and deceptive non-violent jihadists as opposed to terrorists, whose purposes includes trying to discredit and marginalize anyone and everyone trying to expose the truth about Islam.

Moreover, the way to stop Sharia from imposing itself in America is not through legislation. The way to stop Sharia is to outlaw Islam on the grounds that it isn't a faith-based religion but instead a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that masquerades as being a religion in order to dupe the gullible societies it intends to subjugate into a very draconian form of Islamic totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia, and to ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration ASAP on the grounds that it is really covert and deceptive non-violent jihad for the purpose of mass Muslim infiltration and stealth demographic conquest.

Indeed, you can't import Islam into your country and not at the same time also import Sharia and Jihad, as Sharia and Jihad are intrinsic to Islam. In fact, Sharia is the will of Allah and Jihad is the sixth and most important pillar of Islam.

Hence, we should not waste our limited time trying to pass bills to make Sharia on a state by state basis illegal, as once the Muslim population reaches critical mass it will easily exploit the left to get those bills overturned in any event. Instead, we should focus and concentrate all of our efforts and resources instead on outlawing Islam in America and on banning and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage.

As a matter of fact, unless Islam is outlawed and mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, which is really covert and deceptive non-violent jihad for the purpose of mass Muslim infiltration and stealth demographic conquest, is outlawed and banned, the USA as a free independent country is doomed. It's only a matter of time.