Federalists And Anti Federalists Essay

721 words - 3 pages

The intent of this essay is to show different viewpoints of federalists and anti-federalist colonists and how they were overcome by compromises to form our constitution.
It is important to first understand that the birth of our nation is a result of two major events, which we call founding moments. It all began when various unfair and inconsistent policies of England had changed Colonists goodwill towards the imperial power. Colonists felt abandoned, persecuted and betrayed by England. The anger towards England increased due to several misunderstandings and arguments. On one side colonists were not happy and other side England felt that colonists were being ungrateful and paranoid.
The anger led colonist's to have feelings and visions of self governance based on Democracy. This was the first founding moment. A desire to form a new nation, declaring independence from England became goal for most colonists, despite their economical, racial or religious differences. That dream became reality after England was defeated in the war of independence in 1776 and a new nation was born.
After the war, came time for healing and chaos. Once the influence of England had gone, colonists had to face reality and form a new government. Chaos was subdued by promise of compromises. Fears were calmed when it was decided that delegates would meet and come up with a universal solution to their current problems and will address their future.
There were many different viewpoints and to structure a new form of government became work in progress. This is now known as second founding moment where various ideologies came together to create a foundation for our great country.

The nation was carved out of ideas of Federalists and anti federalists by negotiations, compromises and ideals of equality and fairness to all. After the war of independendence, colonists had a basic confederation structure for socio-political affairs. There were various viewpoints amongst different delegates from different states in the colonies which had to be addressed and a common solution was needed to ensure law and order and socio-political stability.
Federalists believed that concentration of power should be with federal or strong central government. They believed this was the solution to all the problems and would create a stronger nation. They challenged the...

Find Another Essay On Federalists and anti-federalists

985 words - 4 pages
Were For, he methodically lays out the Anti-Federalists’ positions and contributions to the constitutional compromise and why he believes that they too should be considered Founding Fathers as well.
The Anti-Federalists where seen as those primarily opposed to creating a new constitution and stood against this proposition on nearly every point of the debate. The Anti-Federalists gained their name because they were antagonists to

802 words - 3 pages
division between the American people. These two groups
were the federalists, who believed that the constitution was good, and the anti-federalists
who thought that the constitution would not be able to protect the rights of the people.
These two groups had conflicting views but together, they both wanted the same thing.
The same thing was that America should be controlled by the people by the principles
of federalism.
Both

753 words - 3 pages
was exactly opposite of what they are.
According to the proper definition, the Anti-Federalists were really more “Federal” than the so-called Federalists. Many Anti-Federalists felt this way because “they took their bearings from the principles of federalism laid down in the Articles.” (Allen viii) The Anti-Federalists say they stuck with the Articles of Confederation and stayed with the government. Before the Federalists took on their

1680 words - 7 pages
The Anti-Federalists had many views that were different than those of the Federalists. One the differences that seems to be important, is who they view as “The people”. The Anti-Federalists believed that common people should be able to be active participants of their government; this involvement includes having a say in the laws that are made and the protection of everyday working class people. This common man involvement is reinforced by the

780 words - 4 pages
Revolution and favored American assistance. They desired to limit the role of the national government, choosing local control. Democratic-Republicans feared that the creation of the bank would link private individuals too closely to government institutions. Anti-federalists also argued that the Constitution did not explicitly give the federal government the power to grant such charters; it was unconstitutional.
Another difference was on how each

730 words - 3 pages
Jeffersonians vs. FederalistsDuring the period of 1801-1817, the Jeffersonians and the Federalists were viewed differently when it came to the federal Constitution. The Jeffersonians were viewed as strict constructionists and the Federalists were more of a group of loose constructionists. Although the two parties had their different views on the federal government, they occasionally switched their views to help solve certain situations.The

984 words - 4 pages
At the onset of our nation's history, the government was divided primarily into two politcal parties, the Federalists and the Republicans. The Federalists, as the name implies, supported a strong national government and military, and a loose-constructionist view of the new U.S. Constitution. The Republicans, meanwhile, were advocates of states' rights and a weaker central government. The Republican and Federalist Parties, however, did not always

2939 words - 12 pages
Hillsborough. In the July heat, sitting in the meeting room of the local Presbyterian Church, William Davie quickly realized the momentous significance of the fact that with local elections for state delegates completed the previous March, the result was that far fewer Federalists were in attendance at the convention. A majority of the 284 delegates present were Antifederalists and had over the previous months repeatedly voiced their fervent

928 words - 4 pages
Practice 3.3.2 Comparing the Federalists and Republicans
To what extent were the policies of Presidents Jefferson and Madison a departure from those of Federalist Presidents Washington and Adams?
The policies of Presidents Jefferson and Madison differed dramatically from those of Presidents Washington and Adams in that they advocated civil and states' rights instead of favoring a strong central government and preferred an agricultural rather

2012 words - 9 pages
, especially if new states are admitted westward. Those new states would have to be agrarian states, since most states with an economy based on trade were located on the coast. The Bill of Rights were originally created for the content of Anti-Federalists as well, and here the Federalist are using it to weaken the federal government; however, they wished to weaken the federal government in order to preserve their party and their trade and commerce. The

668 words - 3 pages
Although national political parties were considered “divisive and disloyal”, the first two-party system of the United States, Hamiltonian-Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans, emerged during George Washington’s administration. The political division was later sharpened with Jay’s Treaty. They differ from each other in various aspects. Nevertheless, the political turbulent during the 1790s greatly expanded the public sphere.
The Federalists

Similar Essays

1342 words - 6 pages
Constitutional Convention, which was endeavoring to write out a document that would more or less define the political structure and trajectory of the whole country. These two factions were the Federalist and the Anti-Federalists and they’re quarrel was over what a right understanding of federalism, republicanism and America was.
While many different issues littered they’re public debate through published tracts, booklets and a litany of news

645 words - 3 pages
Constitution called themselves the Federalists, and their opponents, who supported states rights over centralized power, were called the Anti-federalists.The Anti-federalists' arguments against the Constitution represented deep mistrust of centralized government, which found its source in the colonial experience leading up to the revolution. The principle contention of the Anti-federalists was that the national government could never be as

650 words - 3 pages
system of government, with two sides emerging both with contrary, but comparable motives on how to keep their country running efficiently. First there were the Federalists, who favored a stronger national government run by elected officials. They believed there was a need to protect both the right to private property and free enterprise that only a unified central government could ensure. Then there were Anti- Federalists who believed that the bulk of

633 words - 3 pages
After America finally broke away from Great Britain, a new system of government was needed to maintain order and protect the rights of the people. Naturally, not everyone agreed on how this should be done, and two groups arose with opposing points of view on how the new American government should be run. These groups were the Federalists and Anti-federalists. The Federalists were in favor of a strong central (federal) government, while the Anti