Isn't this a little confusion over Vmo and Vne?
The plane doesn't necessarily disintegrate at Vne either for that matter but it's likely to cause damage. I doubt the integrity of the plane or
warranty conditions were a concern for the pilot of AAL77.

I really don't care what or how you think sir. I learn all I need to know about you by reading your posts.

I do my own thinking, thanks much.

Anybody that still believes the official story so many years later WANTS to believe the official story, and since he has not been persuaded by facts
and irregularities in the last decade, he will not be persuaded by anything I have to post. He is ignorant of facts, and blissfully so.

Isn't this a little confusion over Vmo and Vne?
The plane doesn't necessarily disintegrate at Vne either for that matter but it's likely to cause damage. I doubt the integrity of the plane or
warranty conditions were a concern for the pilot of AAL77.

Quite. Some people can't quite get their head around that though. It's like when you get in a lift and it says it's limited to 250kg or whatever,
doesn't mean that it's going to plummet to the bottom if you load it with 251kg.

Aren't you they one saying you couldn't understand how flight 77 parts got outside the pentagon? Yet, you think there should be some consequence for
the excess in speed? Crashed jet and parts on the pentagon lawn? What more do you want?

I want neutral parties to examine that debris, compare part numbers and such (I worked in aircraft manufacturing for a number of years and know how
that part works), and get a positive ID on what those parts were.

That won't happen because the government keeps everything secret and away from the public view. There is a reason for the government doing that--it
has something to hide.

Sorry, I haven't had a chance to read through the entire thread yet, but here is a link to a transcript from the interview the C-130 pilot gave 9/11
commission staffers. Just in case the OP is still interested it hasn't been linked to yet.

originally posted by: Boone 870
Sorry, I haven't had a chance to read through the entire thread yet, but here is a link to a transcript from the interview the C-130 pilot gave 9/11
commission staffers. Just in case the OP is still interested it hasn't been linked to yet. www.oredigger61.org...

Thanks for the link.

The first time reading the interview and it's right in line with the data the radar plays and the audio tape have. As I have stated throughout this
thread, all supporting evidence here has confirmed the official story.

Not only does the data show what was there, it also doesn't show any unreported traffic (traffic on radar) lingering in the area that could be
considered part of an undeclared operation.

The mysterious plane(s) reported was the C130 and/or the VEN77 which shows they were not in a position to be part of the plot that has been
speculated.

I want neutral parties to examine that debris, compare part numbers and such (I worked in aircraft manufacturing for a number of years and know how
that part works), and get a positive ID on what those parts were.

This is equally as stupid a request as the call to "see the 85 videos."

Here's why- there can be only 2 scenarios.

1- you are right, and there was a guv conspiracy regarding 9/11. But the evidence is in possession of the guv, and if they choose to give your
"neutral third party" access to it, they will provide whatever they want to make their lies seem true.

2- you are wrong, and they will provide what they have, which would be the exact same evidence that they would provide if they are lying.

Are the believers in the crazy guv conspiracy theory so infantile to actually believe that if they ask, the guv will incriminate themselves? Cuz this
is what you are in effect saying.

In actuality, rather than being such devout cynics in everything and everybody involved with the guv, your only hope for finding proof of your crazy
alternative scenario is to believe in the goodness of the involved individuals in the investigations - the grunt FBI agent that was at Fresh Kills,
the 1st year kid scientist at the morgue identifying DNA, the career firefighter at the Pentagon that saw bodies strapped to airplane seats, the
career firefighter at the WTC that had his son or brother die in the collapses, etc, and hope that they come forward with unassailable proof that the
so called OS is a lie.

I want neutral parties to examine that debris, compare part numbers and such (I worked in aircraft manufacturing for a number of years and know how
that part works), and get a positive ID on what those parts were.

That won't happen because the government keeps everything secret and away from the public view. There is a reason for the government doing that--it
has something to hide.

What does this have to with Vmo and your failed attempt to belittle individuals through your false assertion of superior aeronautical engineering.

You seem to have abandoned that debate? And like a true conspiracists, move the goal post. For what, to the same argument "it's all a lie and a 100
plus eyewitnesses are lying, the coroner is lying, fabricated flight recorder data, radar techs lying, airports lying, DNA techs lying, police lying,
firefighters lying, EMTs lying, Pentagon security is lying, pentagon human remains recovery is a lie, C-130 pilot and crew are lying, jet wreckage
recover is a lie, clean up crew lying, FBI lying, 9/11 commission regarding eyewitness accounts and physical evidence a jet hit the pentagon is a lie,
the Pentagon Building Performance Study 2001 is a lie."

I want neutral parties to examine that debris, compare part numbers and such (I worked in aircraft manufacturing for a number of years and know how
that part works), and get a positive ID on what those parts were.

This is equally as stupid a request as the call to "see the 85 videos."

Here's why- there can be only 2 scenarios.

1- you are right, and there was a guv conspiracy regarding 9/11. But the evidence is in possession of the guv, and if they choose to give your
"neutral third party" access to it, they will provide whatever they want to make their lies seem true.

2- you are wrong, and they will provide what they have, which would be the exact same evidence that they would provide if they are lying.

Are the believers in the crazy guv conspiracy theory so infantile to actually believe that if they ask, the guv will incriminate themselves? Cuz this
is what you are in effect saying.

In actuality, rather than being such devout cynics in everything and everybody involved with the guv, your only hope for finding proof of your crazy
alternative scenario is to believe in the goodness of the involved individuals in the investigations - the grunt FBI agent that was at Fresh Kills,
the 1st year kid scientist at the morgue identifying DNA, the career firefighter at the Pentagon that saw bodies strapped to airplane seats, the
career firefighter at the WTC that had his son or brother die in the collapses, etc, and hope that they come forward with unassailable proof that the
so called OS is a lie.

I've walked in your shoes Mr. Big, on this subject. I actually believed the official story for a number of years. Alas I was never aware of WTC7's
demise late that afternoon.

Though I did have some questions, I fairly well believed the story until I found out about 7, and by then the cat was out of the proverbial bag.
After years of study, it became obvious that the official story could not possibly be true.

And as much studying as I did then, I just found out the other day that the evidence is quite clear that in the case of the north tower, the tower
itself had been prepared for the CD. Bolts removed and other preparation.

So, one can learn something knew every day, if one is curious and keeps an open mind.

Keep a closed mind and believe the statements of known deceivers, and you will be stuck in Never Never Land for the rest of your life.

Well then it describes the crazy guv conspiracy believers with its first line :

"The 9/11 conspiracy theories are a coward’s cult."

And as much studying as I did then, I just found out the other day that the evidence is quite clear that in the case of the north tower, the
tower itself had been prepared for the CD. Bolts removed and other preparation.

.

Uh huh.

I'm sure that YOU believe that.

The truth is that you read someone's blog and they convinced you of this.

And as much studying as I did then, I just found out the other day that the evidence is quite clear that in the case of the north tower, the tower
itself had been prepared for the CD. Bolts removed and other preparation.

So basically you are saying that you were asleep that day. EVERY news station was talking about WTC 7 and how it was expected to collapse that
evening. Those that claim that they were unaware of WTC 7 that day were:

1. Not alive/old enough to understand
2. Have goldfish memory and do not remember WTC 7 being all over the news that afternoon/evening
3. Lying

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.