Latest delays.
Reactor 3 that was due to re-start on Feb 28, is now not forecast to start until April 10, another 6 weeks delay.

Reactor 4 that was due to re-start on March 13, is now not forecast to start until April 24, also about 6 weeks late._________________"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"

Feel sorry for the poor sod who's job it is manage this project... or I wonder how many project managers they've got through in the last year!?

Feel like they could have saved a lot of work/cost by just starting the decommission last year - what's the best case, a few more years at 2/3 power? Hardly seems worth it._________________PowerSwitch on Facebook | The Oil Drum | Twitter | Blog

Reactor 3 that was due to re-start on April 10 is now forecast to re-start on June first.
Reactor 4 that was due to re-start on April 24 is now forecast to re-start on June 15._________________"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"

Latest delays.
Reactor 3 that was due to restart on June 1st is now forecast to start on July 13.
Reactor 4 that was due to restart on June 15 is now forecast to restart on July 27.

About the usual 6 week delay.

Of little near term concern as demand is reduced by coronavirus, and indeed another reactor is shutdown at the request of the national grid due to low demand.

Potentially concerning in the longer term as the two reactors in question represent about 2% of peak demand._________________"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"