Manager Details

Menu

Factor investing in corporate bond markets - Client Case Studies

Does factor investing work for credits? What added value does it offer and how should investors go about finding a credit factor solution to suit their requirements? In this publication, we address these questions and challenges by looking at the lessons learned from our experiences with some major institutions who have incorporated factor investing for corporate bonds into their investment portfolios.

Initially factor investing was primarily popular in the equity domain, but investors are increasingly looking to reap the benefits of factors in other asset classes too or to implement factor investing in a multi-asset context. The same forces that make factor investing work for equities – investor behavior, market constraints and regulations – are also applicable to other asset classes. Its application in the corporate bond market is now at the forefront of factor investing’s dissemination beyond the world of equities.

However, before investors strategically allocate to factors in corporate bond markets, they need to be convinced that such an approach can fulfil their needs. First, by answering questions such as: does factor investing work for credits, and what is its added value for this asset class? Second, many investors have been wary of implementing factor investing in corporate bonds because of the potential challenges that are specifically applicable to this market. For example, lower liquidity, higher transaction costs, and the additional complexity of having to choose between different bonds issued by the same entity.

Read more about factor investing in credits by downloading this new publication.

Follow this Manager on

Browse this manager's…

What’s new

In our second podcast, David Blitz discusses the latest trends and issues in factor investing, in which investors chase factors such as low-volatility, value or momentum to get the best picks for their funds. And he says intriguingly: “We do not offer black box solutions, but rather ‘glass box’ solutions”.

Does low-risk investing work with A-shares? This study finds that the low-risk anomaly is even bigger in China than in the US. It finds that whereas the relation between risk and return is too flat in the US, which is already at odds with the CAPM, the relation is outright inverted in China.

To be considered relevant, a factor must first and foremost be backed by ample empirical evidence. In the absence of such evidence, academic research on multi-asset factor premiums could suffer from ‘p-hacking’ (or ‘data mining’). Recent research by Robeco uses new and previously unused deep historical financial data. The results allay any p-hacking concerns.

Over the past five years, FTSE Russell’s annual smart beta survey of asset owners has become a must-read. It provides useful insights on how factor investing is perceived by global institutional investors. To dig deeper into the results of the latest survey, we talked to Marlies van Boven, Managing Director of Research & Analytics at FTSE Russell.

In the first podcast, Daniel Wild explains why embracing SI is “a good sort of selfish”, as it enables the investor to enjoy superior risk-adjusted returns while also helping the planet on a range of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues at the same time.