activemq-users mailing list archives

James? Any suggestions how to clear a queue with activemq API without
JMX? Thanks.
Adrian Tarau wrote:
> I know the utility of JMX, I use it :) But right now I don't want to
> activate JMX. I saw that ActiveMQ use MX4J 2.1.1(why don't use 3.0.1?)
> and I have already in my application MX4J 3.0.1 libraries and I
> remember I used 3.0.1 with a project that need 2.1.x and was not working.
>
> And of course I cannot have two version of MX4J in my application.
>
> James Strachan wrote:
>> On 5/15/06, Adrian Tarau <ady@daxtechnologies.com> wrote:
>>> Since I use embedded JMS is not necessary to activate also JMX,
>>
>> JMX is extremely useful. e.g. in JConsole you can watch all of the
>> mbeans in an application (the garbage collector, number of threads,
>> amount of memory free together wtih the ActiveMQ mbeans such as all
>> the destinations & consumers and queue depths etc
>>
>>
>>> and JMX
>>> MBeans already use those parts to interrogate for values outside the
>>> JMS
>>> standard. Why not to be accessible with Java code and only JMX?
>>
>> Everything is accessible via Java code and JMX; the reason I suggest
>> JMX is that
>>
>> (i) it can work with remote brokers too
>> (ii) it works great in JConsole - so its really easy to look at the
>> mbeans whenever you like (rather than having to write Java code)
>>
>