Discovered today: Chanterelles from Belarus – the most Chernobyl irradiated country in the World. Mushrooms / Chanterelles absorb radiation like a sponge absorbs water! DO NOT BUY THEM!

The European Union imports radioactive goods from areas with a maximum of 20 Milli Sievert per Year (official) AND MORE – that’s an equivalent of 50 (!) mammograms! FOR CHILDREN. This is dangerous and irresponsible.

So far had a radioactivity of cesium-134 and cesium-137 have been allowed by a maximum of 600 becquerels per kilogram. Since last weekend the EU limit for food from affected areas in Japan, however, was significantly increased. Consumer organization FoodWatch (web) and the Environment Institute Munich announced in a joint statement, that: For example, should fish oil or spices to their previous value to twenty times higher than what corresponds to 12 500 becquerels per kilogram.

Excerpt from hard to get paper “The Main Scientific Reports” – International Congress “The World after Chernobyl” Minsk (Belarus), 1996 – by russian atomic physicist in the former Soviet Union, Prof. Vassili Nesterenko (BELRAD Institute, Minsk: http://www.belrad-institute.org/) He was one of the last independet scientists in Belarus and a liquidator during the Chernobyl catastrophe (atomic reactor explosion in 1986). Belarus adapted a program in the mid 90ies which calls irradiated areas of 1 – 5 C/km² as clean and stopped money. The same will happen in Fukushima.

I met Nesterenko in person in April 2006, in Geseke / Germany, during a Belarussian-German meeting “20 Years of Chernobyl”. Along with Prof. Alexey Jablokov (whom I met on April 9th 2011) he published this study:

Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment (1,000,000 deahts):

ROSATOM – The Builder of Chernobyl RBMK builds the VVER reactor in Ostrovets, Belarus. Here is an overview: “radionuclides content in the soil samples taken at the Ostrovets site is within the following limits:

After leaving Areva, SIEMENS (web) cooperates with ROSATOM (web) – the russian concern, which started building the first Belarusian atomic reactor. Belarus is the most Chernobyl affected country in the world. Still more than 2 million people are living in contaminated areas there. Russia is also involved in the construction of Iranian atomic reactors. SIEMENS – what have you done? Source HERE – more about the Belarusian reactor HERE

The same costs explosion will happen in Belarus with ROSATOM and Ostrovets

Areva is building six EPR reactors in the earthquake area and nature reserve in India Jaitapur:

In Iran they wanted money and in Belarus ROSATOM is used by Russia as an instrument to take Belarus as hostage. For the next 6 – 10 years Russia and Belarus officials are going to stop democratic changes in Belarus. They are starting a war against their own people.

Chernobyl’s Hostages:http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html#Yr9904 – quote “What could they do in that situation? They made the most simplest decision – to return to the contaminated zones. Why? Because it is at least a week guarantee that they will have Chernobyl’s compensations for those remaining. For example, people living in zones of eviction have the right to receive 50 rubles per month (today it is about 2 USD). People working in that zones have rights to receive 300 rubles per month (it is about 12 USD). Taking into account that the average salary in Novozubkovo is 290 rubles per month, it is not difficult to imagine how such little money is important for the people.” More: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html

How much of the Russian electricity Belarus consumes, where it comes from. Will the Russians build a nuclear power plant in Belarus? TUT.BY-TV shows and interview with the director of the Russian National Energy Security Foundation (Moscow), Konstantin Simonov: http://news.tut.by/economics/233585.html

The IAEApromotes nuclear energy worldwide.

The IAEA is thus promoting the proliferation.

Because also in the “axis of evil states” (quote Bush Administration, USA) like Iran and Belarus, atomic energy programs are starting. The IAEA was in Minsk while the construction contract was signed.

The government in Minsk intends to introduce price controls – and will destroy what is remaining of the Belarusian economy. The black market will flourish. Statutory price controls are a classic in the oil-in-fire arsenal to a government in the fight against hyperinflation.

The central bank devalued Belarusian rubles six days ago by 54.4 percent – and has stolen the population more than half of their purchasing power. Already in April the central bank has stopped selling gold to the Belarusians. Finally, the Belarusians bought amplified electrical appliances such as refrigerators and washing machines – because they hold (as opposed to computers and to IPAD) it#s worth at least a few years.

This flight into real assets of any kind is typical when a currency goes down in a hyperinflation.

Exclusive photos – of the work of the belarusian Fond “For the Children of Chernobyl”; based in Minsk, Belarus. The first civil movement after the Chernobyl explosion, NGO. More than 20 years of active help for 360,000 children and 2000,0000 belarusians. Today oppressd by the belarusian state:

The belarusian government tries to “end” Chernobyl. As the japanese government tries to “end” Fukushima. With the support of the World Health Organisation, UNSCEAR, U.N. and the IAEA. In Belarus radiation signs are suspended. Villages reinterpreted as clean (since 2007 1000). Tolerance limits for nuclear contamination to be raised, as in Fukushima, as in the EU, March 2011. Standards for food, water, land can be reduced. While Fukushima exploded, the contract for the construction of the first Belarusian nuclear power plant was signed, although 72% of the Chernobyl fallout went down on Belarus. ROSATOM builds this reactor, just like in Iran. With the full support of fake humanitarian programs such as CORE (link) or international fake help programs: which only have one aim: To “end” Chernobyl – although it’s full effects are just starting to grow.

ICRP, WHO and IAEA say: External and internal radiation is the same – this is downplaying, neither is it ethic nor is it scientific valid.