Mike Tierney, co-director of the Institute for the Theory & Practice of
International Relations (ITPIR) at the College of William & Mary,
joined co-author Chris Marcoux of DePauw University in presenting their paper
“Environmental and Climate Finance in a New World” to a group of scholars, aid
practitioners and policymakers in Stockholm, Sweden. The program was streamed
live on the web on June 4 and will be edited into a program to be broadcast
later this month on Swedish national educational TV.

The conference was co-sponsored by the United Nations
University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), the
Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) and the Swedish International
Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) as part of UNU’s initiative to support
Research and Communication on Foreign Aid (ReCom). Finn Tarp of UNU-Wider opened the discussion,
“When you look to international debate about these issues … you have to bring
together a large global network of informed people from different perspectives
and that’s what we are trying to do. Consequently, some 225 studies will be
available at the end of this year.”

Marcoux, who was a Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow at the College
of William & Mary, collaborated on the paper with Tierney and fellow AidData
researchers Brad Parks, AidData Executive
Director; Christian Peratsakis of Development Gateway; and Timmons Roberts of
Brown University. Updating their
previous research published in the book Greening Aid, the authors found that
over the past 30 years foreign aid has become less environmentally
damaging. Within the category of aid
designed to benefit the environment donors have increasingly chosen to allocate
aid to address global environmental challenges, rather than environmental
problems that are localized in developing countries. Further, despite the fact that numerous new
multilateral institutions have been created to coordinate donor funding to
address climate change, donor governments are choosing to allocate aid
bilaterally through their own aid agencies rather than working through these
multilateral channels.

Following the presentation, Tierney explained: “Researchers at the conference were skeptical of the way
that donors have tracked climate finance and environmental aid. So, they seemed
to like the fact that we had our own independent categorization system that we
could apply consistently across time and across donors. This is necessary if you want to create any
kind of credible baseline against which to assess donor promises for new and
additional aid to address climate change.
Recipient country governments are very nervous about
"re-labeling" of development finance as climate finance. Our categorization scheme would make it more
difficult to engage in such substitution activities."

Overall Tierney concluded "We are very encouraged by
the work being sponsored under the leadership of the United Nations University. They encouraged us to update our work on
environmental aid and put us directly in touch with a network of researchers in
Africa who can put our data to use and who can serve as research collaborators.”