Enlightening Symbols: A Short History of Mathematical by Joseph Mazur

By Joseph Mazur

Whereas we all on a regular basis use simple math symbols resembling these for plus, minus, and equals, few people comprehend that a lot of those symbols weren’t on hand earlier than the 16th century. What did mathematicians depend upon for his or her paintings earlier than then? and the way did mathematical notations evolve into what we all know this day? In Enlightening Symbols, popular math author Joseph Mazur explains the attention-grabbing background at the back of the improvement of our mathematical notation approach. He indicates how symbols have been used firstly, how one image changed one other through the years, and the way written math was once conveyed earlier than and after symbols turned commonly adopted.

Traversing mathematical background and the principles of numerals in several cultures, Mazur appears at how historians have disagreed over the origins of the numerical approach for the prior centuries. He follows the transfigurations of algebra from a rhetorical variety to a symbolic one, demonstrating that the majority algebra prior to the 16th century used to be written in prose or in verse applying the written names of numerals. Mazur additionally investigates the unconscious and mental results that mathematical symbols have had on mathematical proposal, moods, that means, communique, and comprehension. He considers how those symbols effect us (through similarity, organization, id, resemblance, and repeated imagery), how they result in new principles through unconscious institutions, how they make connections among event and the unknown, and the way they give a contribution to the conversation of uncomplicated mathematics.

From phrases to abbreviations to symbols, this e-book indicates how math advanced to the widespread types we use this day.

Additional info for Enlightening Symbols: A Short History of Mathematical Notation and Its Hidden Powers

Example text

The open plains of the south and the waters of the gulf were easy entrances, and the hills of the east and northeast were easy passageways to the urban centers of Babylonia. Frequent invasions by seminomadic populations collaged the whole region into contrasting ethnicities that continuously mingled and fused. Southern Mesopotamia’s large and growing urban centers were sustained by a unprecedentedly wide socioeconomical linkage that, for the first time in history, required a managerial workforce to administer, organize, and account for trade and 12 Chapter 2 “Mazur” — // — : — page  — # labor.

It was a arrangement of vertical and horizontal bars in a decimal system very like our own, except there was still no notion of a zero placeholder. 2. Chinese counting rods. Naming numbers and finger counting may be fine for representing small quantities, but addition, multiplication, and division require some moving and removing: writing, scratching out, and rewriting. In the absence of cheap paper in the first century bc, counting rods, which could be quickly moved and removed in the course of a sequence of calculations, were most effective.

Aztec numerals began with dots for units up to . After , they became pictorial. A full feather was considered to be , and so a quarter feather was , a half feather was , and three-quarters was . The symbol for , was a purse that presumably contained  times , though the purse itself had no clear indication of that product. 5. Low Aztec numerals. 6. Higher Aztec numerals. As with other systems on other continents, the system was additive. Unlike the Babylonian single base system, however, the Aztec system had three bases: , , Certain Ancient Number Systems 23 “Mazur” — // — : — page  — # and ,.