On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 16:57 +0000, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Friday 20 January 2006 16:41, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> > Is it? I regret to say this, but this isn't necessarily my impression on
> >
> > > RH's role in Fedora.
> This is a serious issue but it almost looks like the QOTW that I read today
> about python:
> ...in reality, some things are carefully thought out and craftily
> implemented, some things are engineering tradeoffs made at a certain
> time, and some things are just accidents -- but python-dev will
> happily defend the current solution with the same energy, no matter
> what it is.
> """
>
> Sometime I have the feeling that this is what happens with the Fedora Core
> package selection. :-)
I am not sufficiently familiar with python, but wrt. Fedora, I can't
deny the feeling this is just powerplays. Some people don't seem to have
realized that a "community" project works differently and needs
different steering mechanisms than an enterprize controlled product ;)
Ralf