(02-11-2012 05:07 AM)Misanthropik Wrote: Damn, Chas...you need a smoke or a new box of Tampax?

What the actual fuck?

Ha!

I think he just means you might be a bit of a negative grump grump. But hey, I know it can take a lot to pull me out of they grumpies... so here, maybe this will cheer us all... a synopsis of a classic:

Don'tcha just love productive creative criticism interpretation?

A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move to higher levels. ~ Albert Einstein

(02-11-2012 05:07 AM)Misanthropik Wrote: Damn, Chas...you need a smoke or a new box of Tampax?

What the actual fuck?

Bah. You're always so focused on the actual fuck itself. You need to look more at the vague implication of the fuck; even at the remnants of a fuck long-since gone. I'm just as inclined to naturalism as you or anyone else here, but like a good detective, you must broaden your vison a bit. Take a step back and look at the fullness of the picture. The actual fuck is indeed important, but it is only a small piece of the overall puzzle. Much like when one looks directly at a star in the night sky; the object is blurry and difficult to define. But when one fixes his gaze to either side of the star and observes it in his periphery; it becomes clear. I say again, the actual fuck is a fine prospect, but to gain an overall awareness of the fullness of the fuckedness, you must open yourself to the more implied aspects of the fuck as well.

Bah. You're always so focused on the actual fuck itself. You need to look more at the vague implication of the fuck; even at the remnants of a fuck long-since gone. I'm just as inclined to naturalism as you or anyone else here, but like a good detective, you must broaden your vison a bit. Take a step back and look at the fullness of the picture. The actual fuck is indeed important, but it is only a small piece of the overall puzzle. Much like when one looks directly at a star in the night sky; the object is blurry and difficult to define. But when one fixes his gaze to either side of the star and observes it in his periphery; it becomes clear. I say again, the actual fuck is a fine prospect, but to gain an overall awareness of the fullness of the fuckedness, you must open yourself to the more implied aspects of the fuck as well.

Do you see what I'm saying, Chas?

It's the actual fucks that count, the rest is masturbation and fantasy. Not that that is bad, but learning how to tell the difference will keep you out of actual jail.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.

(04-11-2012 06:52 AM)Misanthropik Wrote: Bah. You're always so focused on the actual fuck itself. You need to look more at the vague implication of the fuck; even at the remnants of a fuck long-since gone. I'm just as inclined to naturalism as you or anyone else here, but like a good detective, you must broaden your vison a bit. Take a step back and look at the fullness of the picture. The actual fuck is indeed important, but it is only a small piece of the overall puzzle. Much like when one looks directly at a star in the night sky; the object is blurry and difficult to define. But when one fixes his gaze to either side of the star and observes it in his periphery; it becomes clear. I say again, the actual fuck is a fine prospect, but to gain an overall awareness of the fullness of the fuckedness, you must open yourself to the more implied aspects of the fuck as well.

Do you see what I'm saying, Chas?

It's the actual fucks that count, the rest is masturbation and fantasy. Not that that is bad, but learning how to tell the difference will keep you out of actual jail.

Ahh, but take the story "The Murders In The Rue Morgue", if you would. The "actual fuck" seemed to be nothing more than a horrible murder by an unknown assailant, who evaded capture in unknown ways, thus rendering the case as cold.

And yet, when Dupin takes a step back and looks at the vagueness of fuck in his periphery, he sees many finer details that had been overlooked by those concerned only with the actual fuck at hand. Ultimately, those details, while minor, were infinitely important in the solving of the murders.

The actual fuck is most certainly to be considered first, but it would be a grave error to assume that it is all that counts, and that any peripheral fuck is masturbation or even "fantasy".

Or, if you wish, the actual fuck is that animals slowly change their form to become brand new species. But if we take a step back and look at the overall picture, we find genetics, which we would have otherwise missed, and which plays a vital part in the slow transitions that take part within the actual fuck itself.

(04-11-2012 07:07 AM)Chas Wrote: It's the actual fucks that count, the rest is masturbation and fantasy. Not that that is bad, but learning how to tell the difference will keep you out of actual jail.

Ahh, but take the story "The Murders In The Rue Morgue", if you would. The "actual fuck" seemed to be nothing more than a horrible murder by an unknown assailant, who evaded capture in unknown ways, thus rendering the case as cold.

And yet, when Dupin takes a step back and looks at the vagueness of fuck in his periphery, he sees many finer details that had been overlooked by those concerned only with the actual fuck at hand. Ultimately, those details, while minor, were infinitely important in the solving of the murders.

The actual fuck is most certainly to be considered first, but it would be a grave error to assume that it is all that counts, and that any peripheral fuck is masturbation or even "fantasy".

Or, if you wish, the actual fuck is that animals slowly change their form to become brand new species. But if we take a step back and look at the overall picture, we find genetics, which we would have otherwise missed, and which plays a vital part in the slow transitions that take part within the actual fuck itself.

What the actual fuck are you talking about? Are you implying something about me or is this a general rant?

If it's about me, just actually fucking say it.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.