Being a proud Atheist, and a freedom loving INFIDEL AKA "KUFFAR", WE are threatened by the primitive pidgeon chested jihad boys in the medieval east.
FRACK YOU!! SAY US ALL!! Don't annoy the Pagans and Bikers,, it's a islam FREE ZONE!!! LAN ASTASLEM!!!!

Muslim Rapists
Prefer Blondes

Originally published under the title, "Why Muslim Rapists
Prefer Blondes: A History."
The Muslim penchant to target "white" women for sexual
exploitation — an epidemic
currently plaguing Europe, especially Britain and Scandinavia — is as old as
Islam itself, and even traces back to Muhammad.
Much literary evidence attests to this in the context of Islam's early predations
on Byzantium (for centuries, Christendom's easternmost bulwark against the
jihad). According to Ahmad M. H. Shboul (author of Byzantium and the
Arabs: The Image of the Byzantines as Mirrored in Arabic Literature),
Christian Byzantium was the "classic example of the house of war,"
or Dar al-Harb — that is, the quintessential realm that needs to be
conquered by jihad. Moreover, Byzantium was seen "as a symbol of
military and political power and as a society of great abundance."
The similarities between pre-modern Islamic views of Byzantium and modern
Islamic views of the West — powerful, affluent, desirable, and the greatest
of all infidels — should be evident. But they do not end here. To the
medieval Muslim mind, Byzantium was further representative of "white
people" — fair haired/eyed Christians, or, as they were known in Arabic,
Banu al-Asfar, "children of yellow" (reference to blonde
hair).
Continues Shboul:The Byzantines as a people were considered
as fine examples of physical beauty, and youthful slaves and slave-girls of
Byzantine origin were highly valued.... The Arab's appreciation of the
Byzantine female has a long history indeed. For the Islamic period, the
earliest literary evidence we have is a hadith (saying of the Prophet).
Muhammad is said to have addressed a newly converted [to Islam] Arab:
"Would you like the girls of Banu al-Asfar?" Not only were
Byzantine slave girls sought after for caliphal and other palaces (where some
became mothers of future caliphs), but they also became the epitome of
physical beauty, home economy, and refined accomplishments. The typical
Byzantine maiden who captures the imagination of litterateurs and poets, had
blond hair, blue or green eyes, a pure and healthy visage, lovely breasts, a
delicate waist, and a body that is like camphor or a flood of dazzling light.[1]
While the essence of the above excerpt is true, the reader should not be
duped by its overly "romantic" tone. Written for a Western academic
publication by an academic of Muslim background, the essay is naturally
euphemistic to the point of implying that being a sex slave was desirable —
as if her Arab owners were enamored devotees who merely doted over and
admired her beauty from afar.[2]

During Muhammad's time, European slave
girls were held out as sexual trophies to entice Muslims to fight.

Indeed, Muhammad asked a new convert "Would you like the girls of
Banu al-Asfar?" as a way to entice him to join the jihad and reap its
rewards — which, in this case, included the possibility of enslaving and
raping blonde Byzantine women — not as some idealistic discussion on beauty.
This enticement seems to have backfired with another Muslim who refused
Muhammad's call to invade Byzantine territory (the Tabuk campaign). "O
Abu Wahb," cajoled Muhammad, "would you not like to have scores of
Byzantine women and men as concubines and servants?" Wahb responded:
"O Messenger of Allah, my people know that I am very fond of women and,
if I see the women of the Byzantines, I fear I will not be able to hold back.
So do not tempt me by them, and allow me not to join and, instead, I will
assist you with my wealth."[3]
The prophet agreed but was apparently unimpressed — after all, Wahb could
have all the Byzantine women he desired if the jihad succeeded — and a new
Sura for the Koran (9:49) was promptly delivered condemning the man to hell
for his reported hypocrisy and failure to join the jihad.
Thus a more critical reading of Shboul's aforementioned excerpt finds that
European slave girls were not "highly valued" or
"appreciated" as if they were precious statues — they were held out
as sexual trophies to entice Muslims to the jihad.
Moreover, the idea that some sex slaves became mothers to future caliphs
is meaningless since in Islam's patriarchal culture, mothers—Muslim or
non-Muslim — were irrelevant in lineage and had no political status. And talk
of "litterateurs and poets" and "a body that is like
camphor or a flood of dazzling light" is further anachronistic and does
a great disservice to reality: These women were — as they still are — sex
slaves, treated no differently than the many slaves of the Islamic State
today.

White women were and are seen as
sexually promiscuous by nature, provoking Muslim men into lusting after
them.

For example, during a recent sex
slave auction held by the Islamic State, blue and green-eyed Yazidi girls
were much coveted and fetched the highest price. Even so, these concubines
are being cruelly tortured. In one instance, a Muslim savagely beat his
Yazidi slave's one-year-old child until
she agreed to meet all his sexual demands.
Another relevant parallel between medieval and modern Islamic views
exists: white women were and continue to be seen as sexually promiscuous by
nature — essentially provoking Muslim men into lusting after them.
Much of this is discussed in Byzantium Viewed by the Arabs, by
Nadia Maria El Cheikh. She writes:Fitna, [an Islamic term] meaning disorder
and chaos, refers also to the beautiful femme fatale who makes men lose their
self-control. Fitna is a key concept in defining the dangers that women, more
particularly their bodies, were capable of provoking in the mental universe
of the Arab Muslims.
After explaining how the fair haired/eyed Byzantine woman exemplified
Islam's femme fatale of fitna, Cheikh writes:In our [Muslim] texts, Byzantine women are
strongly associated with sexual immorality...Our sources show not Byzantine women but
[Muslim] writers' images of these women, who served as symbols of the eternal
female—constantly a potential threat, particularly due to blatant
exaggerations of their sexual promiscuity....
Cheikh documents how Muslims claimed that Byzantine (or "white
Christian") females were the "most shameless women in the whole
world"; that, "because they find sex more enjoyable, they are prone
to adultery"; that "adultery is commonplace in the cities and
markets of Byzantium" — so much so that "the nuns from the convents
went out to the fortresses to offer themselves to monks."
Concludes Cheikh:While the one quality that our [Muslim]
sources never deny is the beauty of Byzantine women, the image that they
create in describing these women is anything but beautiful. Their depictions
are, occasionally, excessive, virtually caricatures, overwhelmingly
negative....Such anecdotes [of sexual promiscuity] are
clearly far from Byzantine reality and must be recognized for what they are:
attempts to denigrate and defame a rival culture through their exaggeration
of the laxity with which Byzantine culture dealt with its women....In fact, in Byzantium, women were expected
to be retiring, shy, modest, and devoted to their families and religious
observances.... [T]he behavior of most women in Byzantium was a far cry from
the depictions that appear in Arabic sources."[4]
Based on all the above, some historic facts emerge: Byzantium was long
viewed by early Muslims as the most powerful, advanced, and wealthy
"infidel" empire, one highly desired — not unlike modern Islamic
views of the West today. And Byzantine women, or "white women,"
were long viewed as the "femme fatale" of Islam — from a carnal
perspective, the most desired, from a pious perspective, the most despised of
women.

British
teen Charlene Downes was sexually assaulted and murdered by a Muslim gang
in 2003.

Turning to today, we find all these same patterns at work — including the
idea that "white women" are naturally promiscuous and provoke pious
Muslim men into raping them. Thus last December in the UK, while a Muslim man
raped a British woman, he told
her that "you white women are good at it" — thereby echoing that
ancient Islamic motif concerning the alleged promiscuity of white women.
The UK is also home to one of the most notorious Muslim-led sex ring
scandals: in Rotherham and elsewhere, thousands of young native British girls
have been systematically groomed, trafficked, beaten and sexually abused by
Muslims — even as the "multiculturalist" authorities and police
stood by and watched. (For more on the UK scandal and Islamic law on sex
slavery click
here).

Linda,
a Swedish victim of a 2005 Muslim gang rape

In fact, all throughout Europe — particularly in the Nordic nations —
thousands of "Byzantine-type" women have been violently raped and
egregiously beaten by Muslims. In Norway, Denmark, and Sweden — where fair
hair and eyes predominate — rape has astronomically risen since those nations
embraced the doctrine of multiculturalism and opened their doors to tens of
thousands of Muslim immigrants.
According to Gatestone
Institute, "Forty years after the Swedish parliament unanimously
decided to change the formerly homogenous Sweden into a multicultural country,
violent crime has increased by 300% and rapes by 1,472%." The
overwhelming majority of rapists are Muslim immigrants. The epidemic is so
bad that some blonde haired Scandinavian women are dying their hair black in
the hopes of warding off potential Muslim predators.
Nor is this phenomenon a product of chance; some modern day Muslims
actually advocate for it. Back in 2011, a female politician and activist
trying to combat sexual immorality in Kuwait suggested
that Muslims import white sex slaves. After explaining how she once asked
Islamic clerics living in the city of Mecca concerning the legality of sex
slavery and how they all confirmed it to be perfectly legitimate, she
explained:A Muslim state must [first] attack a
Christian state—sorry, I mean any non-Muslim state—and they [the women, the
future sex slaves] must be captives of the raid. Is this forbidden? Not at
all; according to Islam, sex slaves are not at all forbidden. [See here,
here,
and here
for more on Islamic law and sex slavery.]
As for what sort of "infidel" women are ideal, the Kuwaiti
activist suggested Russian women (most of whom are fair haired and eyed;
ironically, Russia is often seen as Byzantium's successor):In the Chechnya war, surely there are
female Russian captives. So go and buy those and sell them here in Kuwait;
better that than have our men engage in forbidden sexual relations. I don't
see any problem in this, no problem at all.
In short, the ongoing epidemic in the UK, Scandinavia and
elsewhere—whereby Muslim men sexually target white women—is as old as Islam,
has precedents with the prophet and his companions, and, till this day, is
being recommended as a legitimate practice by some in the Muslim world.Raymond Ibrahim, a Judith Friedman
Rosen writing fellow at the
Middle East Forum, is a Shillman fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom
Center and author ofCrucified
Again: Exposing Islam's New War in Christians.

[1] Shboul's essay is found in Arab-Byzantine
Relations in Early Islamic Times (ed. Michael Bonner, Burlington: Ashgate
Publishing, 2004), 240, 248.[2] This apologetic approach is also found in modern
academic works discussing the janissaries—European Christian boys who were
seized by the Ottoman Empire, converted to and indoctrinated in Islam,
trained to be jihadis extraordinaire, and then unleashed on their former
Christian families. Although young, terrified boys were seized from the
clutches of their devastated parents, modern academics claim that Christian
families actually hoped their boys would be taken and trained as janissaries,
as this would ensure that they have a "bright future" in the
Ottoman hierarchy.[3] Arabic tafsir here: http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=1&tTafsirNo=5&tSoraNo=9&tAyahNo=49&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=1
A shorter version of the narrative also appears in Ibn Ishaq, The Life of
Muhammad (trans. A. Guillaume, NY: Oxford University Press, 1997),
602-603.[4] Nadia Maria el Cheikh, Byzantium Viewed by the
Arabs (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004), 123-129.

Turkey says
that it, together with the US, wants an IS-free zone in northern
Syria. That is fine. But who will fill the vacuum in areas cleared
of IS?

Turkey simply
finds joining the international campaign against the Islamic State
an opportunity to install pro-Sunni Islamist rule in areas now
controlled by IS.

In all
reality, Prime Minister Davutoglu wants to replace extreme Islamists
with less extreme Islamists. Turkey is trying, with U.S. help, to
make Syria an extension of Turkey for Muslim Brotherhood Sunni
Islam.

Members of the Free Syrian Army's Al-Tawhid Brigade
pose for a photo in Aleppo, in 2012. (Image source: Vice video
screenshot)

After several months of reluctant negotiations, Turkey has anxiously
decided to join the allied battle against the radical Islamists who fight
under the flag of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (or Islamic State,
ISIS, IS). Turkish jets bombed IS strongholds inside Syria, and police
detained hundreds of IS supporters operating in Turkey, including two
leaders. Moreover, Turkish ministers hastily signed a decree that would
allow the U.S. military to use the critical Incirlik air base for strikes
against IS targets. Incirlik, in southern Turkey near the Syrian border,
is close to many IS strongholds and will cut response times for U.S.
aircraft, increasing the efficiency of anti-militant operations.

The son of Mohammad Javad Zarif -
John Kerry's Iranian counterpart in the nuclear negotiations - was best man
at John Kerry's daughter's wedding two years ago, when she married an
Iranian-American. With such intimate ties,
should John Kerry have revealed this fact through full disclosure and
recused himself from the negotiations?

Crucial aspects of the Iran nuclear deal remain hidden from the public,
and in some instances, from the American government, Bloomberg reports.
In a closed-door session with House members Wednesday, Secretary of
State John Kerry revealed that two side deals between Iran and the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) were reached. Kerry he neither read nor
possesses the secret agreements.
According to U.S. Rep. Mike Pompeo, R-Kan., a member of the House
Intelligence Committee who attended the closed-door session, Congress also is
in the dark on these agreements.
"Kerry told me directly that he has not read the secret side deals.
He told us the State Department does not have possession of these
documents," Pompeo told Bloomberg View columnists Josh Rogin and Eli
Lake.
Furthermore, other secret agreements kept from the public were presented
to Congress on Monday – part of 18 documents the White House were required
to disclose – including secret letters of understanding between the U.S.,
France, Germany , and the United Kingdom that outline some of the ambiguous
aspects of the nuclear deal.
Seventeen of these documents are unclassified, yet they are stored in
ultra-secure facilities intended for top-secret information, the Daily
Beastreports. These extraordinary precautions indicate that
the Obama administration is seeking to keep unclassified documents from
reaching the public.
"A lot of both documents and discussion that have been held in a
classified setting doesn't have classified characteristics to it... to the
extent that many [documents aren't classified,] they should be made totally
public, as far as I'm concerned, so that the public can evaluate for
themselves," U.S. Sen Bob Menendez, D-N.J., told the Daily Beast.
IAEA officials told Pompeo and U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., that the
two side deals involve IAEA inspections of the Parchin military complex and
how Iran and the IAEA would address concerns regarding the military
dimensions of the Islamic Republic's nuclear program.
The Obama Administration is only required to pass documents in its
possession to Congress, therefore the side deals cannot be presented to
Congress or the U.S. public.
"Kerry gave no indications they are seeking these documents and
there is no indication he is the least bit worried he doesn't have access
to this. The Ayatollah [Khamenei] knows what's in the deal but we
don't," Pompeo told Bloomberg.
These elements of secrecy regarding unclassified documents hidden from
the public and side agreements without U.S. knowledge seem to directly
contradict Preside Obama's argument that the Iran nuclear deal is
verifiable and transparent.

The IPT accepts no funding from
outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or
religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on
Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All
donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The
Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3
organization.

The Al Nusrah Front, al Qaeda's official branch in Syria, has
released a statement claiming to have captured US-trained rebels belonging to
a group called "Division 30." The Pentagon denied reports earlier
this week that US-backed fighters had been captured by al Qaeda's jihadists.

The book has
received approval from Khamenei's office and is thus the most
authoritative document regarding his position on the issue.

Khamenei makes
his position clear from the start: Israel has no right to exist
as a state He claims his strategy for the destruction of Israel is not
based on anti-Semitism, which he describes as a European phenomenon. His
position is based on "well-established Islamic principles."

According to
Khamenei, Israel, which he labels an "enemy" and
"foe," is a special case for three reasons. The first is that
it is a loyal "ally of the American Great Satan" and a key
element in its "evil scheme" to dominate "the heartland
of the Ummah."

Khamenei
describes Israel as "a cancerous tumor" whose elimination
would mean that "the West's hegemony and threats will be
discredited" in the Middle East. In its place, he boasts," the
hegemony of Iran will be promoted."

Khamenei's tears
for "the sufferings of Palestinian Muslims" are also
unconvincing. To start with, not all Palestinians are Muslims. And, if
it were only Muslim sufferers who deserved sympathy, why doesn't he beat
his chest about the Burmese Rohingya and the Chechens massacred and
enchained by Vladimir Putin, not to mention Muslims daily killed by
fellow-Muslims across the globe?

In the early days
of his mission, the Prophet Muhammad toyed with the idea of making
Jerusalem the focal point of prayers for Islam. He soon abandoned the
idea and adopted his hometown of Mecca. For that reason, some classical
Muslim writers refer to Jerusalem as "the discarded one," like
a first wife who is replaced by a new favorite. In the 11th
century the Shiite Fatimid Caliph, Al-Hakim even ordered the destruction
of Jerusalem.

Dozens of maps
circulate in the Muslim world, showing the extent of Muslim territories
lost to the infidel that must be recovered. These include large parts of
Russia and Europe, almost a third of China, the whole of India and parts
of the Philippines and Thailand.

Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei (center), is
shown meeting in May 2014 with Iran's military chief of staff and the
commanders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. (Image source: IRNA)

"The flagbearer of Jihad to liberate Jerusalem."

This is how the blurb of "Palestine," a new book, published by
Islamic Revolution Editions last week in Tehran, identifies the author.

The author is "Grand Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Husseini Khamenei,"
the "Supreme Guide" of the Islamic Republic in Iran, a man whose fatwa
has been recognized by U.S. President Barack Obama as having the force of
law.

Edited by Saeed Solh-Mirzai, the 416-page book has received approval
from Khamenei's office and is thus the most authoritative document regarding
his position on the issue.

Khamenei makes his position clear from the start: Israel has no right
to exist as a state.

He uses three words. One is "nabudi" which means
"annihilation". The other is "imha" which means
"fading out," and, finally, there is "zaval"
meaning "effacement."

http://muslimbrotherhoodinamerica.com/the-course/

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and its Role in Enforcing Islamic Law

We need to get off Saudi Barbarian OIL!!!!!Support the Canadian OIL Sands,,, and visit,, Ethicaloil.org

The gravity of the existential threat we face from Islamic Jihad is truly of epic proportions. It is essentially a battle pitting free-civilized man against a totalitarian barbarian. What is at stake is the struggle for our very soul - namely who we are and what we represent. The lives that were sacrificed for individual rights and freedoms that we've come to cherish are being chiseled away from right under our noses by the stealth jihadists. And many of us are in denial and totally clueless.

The left's appeasement and pandering to evil is nothing new. What makes their utopian delusions so infuriating and unpardonable is that it is not only they who will have to pay the consequences, and deservedly, so, they are thwarting and undermining our best efforts at resistance and are thus dragging us down in the process as well.