Monday, 9 July 2018

Telephone Box display panel featuring the Corpusty plough, railway station tearooms, message bearing Swifts, Yellowflag, Otter looking back through time, 19th century view of hamlet, the well on The Street and Common Mallow.

Sunday, 1 July 2018

Kestrel appeared hovering briefly over west end of enclosures putting up all Little Terns, about 60 birds.

Then flew low East along ridge whilst being mobbed.

Little Tern grabbing and striking Kestrel but fails to divert it from its attack run.

Kestrel took one hop on the ground then grabbed chick.

Appeared to be able to see chicks from low level flight.

Very small chick in left talons.

Male Kestrel then flew a short distance and landed within enclosure amongst sea-blight cover.
Over 7 Kestrel visits were recorded to the colony the previous day!?

Kestrel sitting on deck in shade of sea-blight and still being mobbed by Terns.

Bird seemed very bold and would not easily flush away from the colony.

Noted an abundance of Kestrel attacks in log over last two days and communicated with wardens.

The eastern enclosures colony has been wiped out.... by Kestrel??

From a very positive position as reported in last month's
article the Little Tern colony on the Blakeney Spit has met with a major setback
this season. From the 20th May Kestrels were recorded about the colony
enclosure and their interest grew throughout June. Each visit by Kestrelcauses all the Little Terns on the shingle to
rise up as one to meet with and mob it as it hovers and swoops over the colony.
Unfortunately this does not deterthe
raptor from its intended attack route and surveillance run low over the shingle
ridge. By the 30th June over six visits daily
were being witnessed by volunteers , during the monitored middle period alone, involvingtwo if not three Kestrels. The 1st of July
saw the end of any nesting activity in the eastern enclosure and a few pairs
desperately defending chicks left in the western enclosure. A male Kestrel now using
the site as a drive through and sitting on the deck within the colony digesting
its take away. A week later and all chick rearing activity had stopped with
only two pairs of Little Tern feigning nesting rituals on empty scrapes.

It is widely known thatAvian predation is harder to manage than ground predation at tern
colonies, as aerial access to the nest scrape has to be maintained , so
allowing predatory birds in as well. In Britain, Little Terns nest in fairly
mono-specific colonies so predation from other species sharing a location is minimal.
Nest boxes have been tried for a number of species and the success has been
mixed. Roseate Terns seem to take to these most readily, as on Coquet Island, but
this is possibly because they prefer nesting in dense cover and nest boxes
providea familiar alternative, unlike
the minimal open scrape nesting of the Little Tern.

It is also well
documented that Individual avian predators that specialise in, and fixate on predation
of terns often account for most losses at a tern colony. It may be that the
most effective management is to target them specifically and Kestrels are top
of the list in this respect. Supplementary feeding of Kestrels has been
attempted with some effect in the past so as to provide an alternative prey
source and decrease attacks on the tern colonies. It has been difficult to
prove the effectiveness of the method and it may artificially maintain a high
predator population producing a detrimental impact on the terns in future
years. Kestrels have habituated to human efforts to deter them, static or
active as I found with the male on the 1st July which would not flush away from
the colony until the third attempt. They have also been recorded extracting
chicks from funnelled shelters provided for protection but in this case chicks
had not moved from their nest scrapes when the kestrels located them and
attacked.

Lethal control of predators has frequently been considered
but most conservation bodies shy away from this approach on humane grounds and
to avoid negative publicity... This season the NT made every effort and went to
great expense to create a secure site and also identified the rogue predators
at the earliest possible juncture. Unfortunately and without due care and
attention a timely managerial response, specifically targeted to the threat, was
not forthcoming until after the predation event was over....??