I don't see why he wouldn't be able to. I could be totally wrong, but a former person in command seems like a candidate to testify to me.

[Updated at 4:52 p.m.] Acting CIA Director Michael Morrell will testify next week before the Senate Intelligence Committee about the fatal attack in Benghazi instead of David Petraeus, according to the office of that committee's chairwoman, Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

__________________I think the young people enjoy it when I "get down," verbally, don't you?

[Updated at 4:52 p.m.] Acting CIA Director Michael Morrell will testify next week before the Senate Intelligence Committee about the fatal attack in Benghazi instead of David Petraeus, according to the office of that committee's chairwoman, Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

[Updated at 4:52 p.m.] Acting CIA Director Michael Morrell will testify next week before the Senate Intelligence Committee about the fatal attack in Benghazi instead of David Petraeus, according to the office of that committee's chairwoman, Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

Someone has to stand up to this. How can Petraeus' testimony be fungible?

__________________My Message to President-Elect Donald Trump:America did NOT became great because of what government did. America became great because of what the U.S. Constitution prevented our government from doing. The people made America great.

You might also mention that the consulate that was attacked was primarily a CIA post and they controlled it. Adds a little intrigue to the CIA director resigning, no?

I remember reading that Ambassador was really CIA. He was also working with AQ-linked jihadi rebels during the Nato incident. We're probably never gonna know the whole truth.

__________________My Message to President-Elect Donald Trump:America did NOT became great because of what government did. America became great because of what the U.S. Constitution prevented our government from doing. The people made America great.