Mark Altgelt: Stop an impending global crisis

(Note: This article has been corrected and expanded from the previous version.)

Antarctica, Greenland and Arctic ice is melting because more than 90 percent of the heat from greenhouse gas emissions has been absorbed into the oceans and warm currents are rapidly melting exposed ice. Warm currents are breaking up glaciers, thinning ice sheets and disintegrating ice shelves along with the glacial ice that follows them. A section of ice the size of Delaware recently broke away from the Larson Ice Shelf in the Antarctic Peninsula. Globally, 19,500 square miles of sea ice was lost per year between 1996 and 2013, more than double the previous 17 years.

In West Antarctica warm ocean currents, 4,000 feet below sea level, are carving canyons 30 miles long and 600 feet high at the base of three glaciers, causing large sections of floating ice shelves to break away. Those glaciers are in an unstoppable slow motion cascade into the Amundsen Sea.

The West Antarctica Ice Sheet is twice the size of Texas, two and half miles thick and dips more than 5,000 feet below sea level. When the glaciers are gone the massive ice sheet will be exposed to ocean currents that will slowly dislodge and break the ice sheet apart. That could take a thousand or several hundred years and would raise sea level 14 feet.

In the Antarctica Peninsula, next to South America, temperatures have risen nearly 5 degrees since 1950 and the winters have warmed 9 degrees reducing sea ice formation from seven to only four months a year.

Greenland’s glaciers are melting faster than predicted because recent mapping revealed many glaciers are in water deeper than 600 feet which is 6 to 8 degrees warmer than colder Arctic water above 600 feet. Melting of Greenland’s ice would raise sea level 24 feet.

Arctic sea ice has declined 30 percent over the past 30 years and minimum summer sea ice has shrunk 13.4 percent per decade.

The world is facing a catastrophic crisis caused by warming air and ocean temperatures. Republican and Democrat congressional representatives need to fulfill the will of the American people by enacting legislation that would stop heat trapping carbon dioxide emissions.

The Citizen’s Climate Lobby legislative proposal would accomplish that by establishing a gradually increasing fee on the carbon content of coal, oil, and natural gas. The revenue collected would be returned in equal monthly dividend payments to everyone 18 years and older, including a half dividend for one or two children per family. The fee would start at $15 per ton of carbon, adding about 15 cents to a gallon of gas, and would increase $10 per year.

The dividend payments would increase to compensate for the increasing cost of fossil fuels which would stimulate the economy and a market-driven transition to alternative energy because it would be less expensive and a better long-term investment.

The 62 Congressional representatives in the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus should introduce legislation based on the Citizen’s Climate Lobby, “Carbon Fee and Dividend,” proposal. With their votes in Congress and a majority in the Senate, national climate legislation would pass and go to President Trump for his signature or veto.

In the event of a Trump veto, the United States would miss the opportunity to lead the world in developing a sustainable global economy by building a more efficient and productive American economy with an energy infrastructure powered by clean renewable energy. A veto would also further divide the world in addressing climate change and the impending global crisis of rising sea level.

Warming ocean temperatures are melting polar ice which is disrupting the natural balance that regulates Earth’s climate but extreme cold polar atmospheric temperatures make it possible to take drastic action to maintain polar ice and the balance of Earth’s climate.

Arctic ice is receding but water could be pumped onto the winter ice that is melting so it will last throughout the year. Arctic winter temperatures average between -40 to +32 ° Fahrenheit so the pumped water would create a thick layer of solid ice that would be equivalent to old sea ice that has recently been replaced with thin, less solid ice. The science of this has been studied extensively at: www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016EF000410/full

Pumps operating continuously would pump water into 6 to 12 inch diameter horizontal perforated pipes 2 feet above the ice extending out 660 feet. The pipes could be heated to prevent freezing if necessary. The pumps would be spaced a quarter mile apart and powered with electricity through a grid generated by large wind turbines in frames that can be raised under periodically reinforced ice.

The Arctic ice cap regulates global climate because Arctic sea ice reflects the sun’s radiation into space and retains cold ocean temperatures while open water absorbs and retains the sun’s radiation accelerating ocean warming. Warming temperatures in the absence of Arctic ice allow the jet stream to drift south bringing cold Arctic air to Eastern United States and for warm air to penetrate into the Arctic. Warmer ocean temperatures could disrupt the system of global currents that regulate Earth’s temperature.

The water in Greenland’s aquifer should be pumped to the surface to freeze before it bursts and ocean water could also be pumped onto Greenland and Antarctica to maintain strategic ice flows and ice sheets. The pumped water would counteract rising sea level in addition to preserving ice and its benefits.

Restoring Arctic and global ice my seem daunting but not compared to building a sea wall around Florida, moving New York City or colonizing Mars.

As a matter of national and international security the United States Army Corps of Engineers and military personnel should be dispatched and funds allocated to restore the Arctic ice cap. For more information, visit:

Comments

Your are correct this is a money making scheme because by pricing carbon in relation to the damage being caused by climate related catastrophes and melting global ice it would bring about a transition to alternative energy which would create 2.8 million jobs and add 1.4 dollars the national gross domestic product in twenty years.
Looking at the long-term benefit of clean air, more efficient and less expensive energy and good paying clean energy jobs I do not think that is ridiculous.

You are right about the Global Warming Alarmists needing to improve their track record because predictions of increasing temperatures have been understated over the past thirty years. But the data is improving with a network of 3,500 robotic floats that measure ocean temperatures and salinity to a depth of 2,000 meters. The Argo floats, operated by the World Climate Research Program are precisely measuring ocean temperature and found the rate of ocean warming has nearly doubled over the past two decades along with the heat content held within the ocean which is melting global ice. It’s much more accurate that atmospheric temperature measurements unlike CO2 measurements which are very accurate. As for a grandiose plan, what’s not to like about a global economy run on alternative energy and pollution free air.

Ridiculous hyperbole. Climate change has been an ongoing event since the Earth had an atmosphere. Does mankind bend the curve? Yes. How much? No one knows. The only fact is that “climate experts” are constantly and dramatically wrong.

Isn’t it curious that their solution always involves taxing, regulating, and more government control?

The Reds of the past are now the Greens. World socialism is the true goal, not curing man caused climate change. They offer solutions to an undefined problem.

The current human caused warming is being caused by less CO2 in the atmosphere than previous period of global warming. The Citizens Climate Lobby cures a well defined problem of increasing emissions in the atmosphere with a solution prices carbon in relation to the damage it is doing which is a market correction. Sort of like the way the Fed controls the economy with interest rates. The proposal would place a gradually increasing fee on the carbon content of coal, oil, and natural gas. The revenue collected would be returned in equal monthly dividend payments to everyone 18 years and older, including a half dividend for one or two children per family. The fee would start at $15 per ton of carbon, adding about 15 cents to a gallon of gas, and would increase $10 per year. The dividend payments would increase to compensate for the increasing cost of fossil fuels which would stimulate the economy and a market-driven transition to alternative energy because it would be less expensive and a better long-term investment.
That would cure man made climate change which is something the mechanism of capitalism will not do on it’s own. The goal is a sustainable global economy which could be accomplished without taking away the freedom democracy provides. Unless you think Social Security is stealing your freedom which it give people in retirement.

The scenario you paint is a solution searching for a problem. Carbon based fuel sources will be minimally used in 100 years as solar cell efficiency and light weight batteries develop. The Earth can more than handle and cure any effects of the minor amount of CO2 being deployed today.

Let the market cure this issue. We have plenty of time. Capitalism will bring the needed results as clean energy technologies develop. We don’t need government and Socialism to cure a manufactured problem.

A great approach to help reduce CO2 emissions would be by developing a reliable method to extinguish thousands of underground coal fires that are burning at any given moment. Global coal fire emissions represent three percent of the world’s annual CO2 emissions and are estimated to cause 40 tons of mercury to enter the atmosphere annually.

I agree and there must be way to smother those smoldering fires. Or stop them by digging around the perimeter. Maybe that would be a good training exercise for our military personnel.
The fact that they are left burning is evidence of backward priorities.

Mr. Altgelt, thank you for this climate change update regarding the Arctic and Antarctic ice cap regions of our planet.; I would like to share with you, and our citizenry as well as our appointed and elected officials more valuable climate change information and news about the still burning California fires that we are presently experiencing on Dec. 30th… one week into our winter season.

A clip from the blog (highly recommended) of Robert Scribbler: Scribbling for environmental, social and economic justice–

“If there is one thing we know about climate change and weather it is that it promotes extremes. Particularly extreme swings between cooler+wet and record hot+dry as the water cycle is thrown through the atmospheric equivalent of a hyperloop. And the level of extremity California experienced from winter to summer ran a six month race from wettest to hottest. For following the early year deluge, 2017 rapidly rocketed into the hottest summer in California history. Temperatures in many places regularly soared to well above the scorching 100 degree mark. Records for all-time hottest days fell like trees before the wild hurricane.”

“We won’t go through all the exhaustive numbers of that grim tally of burning. But we will say that more than ten thousand homes and buildings burned. That many souls perished in the blazes. That billions in damages were inflicted. At times, ash and embers rained down across California as if from a volcanic eruption. The skies — marred by great pillars of smoke erupting from a blasted Earth.”

“… if we don’t turn back from the warming that caused this, the worst is yet to come.”