1. womenz mate like bababooons when men do not teach train dem lzozlzzol
2. againg consterives like murray and bill bennette butthexers and neocnths chalrlotte allen do not undertsand da onnection between ass coking and the plethora of sore women anuthes zllzlzzlzlo
3. blohgegrss on game like eharteists are far more chuirst like and jessusth like dan da flase fakey fake preahcheherzz neoocn pumpn n dump iditions who think all womenz are like betty crocker innococonetz lzlzozlz lzozlzlzol

thissi is why dey publish tucker max rhymes with godlamn sax r as women publish and promote hims to assocck your future wife and deosul her and cobnevert her into a vehicle of welath transffer to da fedz zlzllzolz

he comes across as no different than those pua community scammers he bashes. his blog is just pure criticism of other pua’s, but he offers nothing constructive. oh but of course he does have good advice, you just need to buy his book or pay for one-on-one coaching, except HIS advice is legitimate because he only does it ‘semi-professionally’.

I have erecenly been doing a lot of htinking and on behlaf of me and bmy bortherssz i was wondering if u could please hold back on the assocking of our future wives in secretey tapped sessions during college and stop wiring fiat dollarz to assockers for ther assocking feats, and laos please stop laoading epic unprecedednt asscocking debt on our future wifves wihile senidng forth neoconalphas to asscokc them in the buttocks and thsly deosul them zlzolzzlz. Mr. Bernanke and Mr. BEennett–dear sirs with all due repsects–you are really old like thomas jeffersons era s so your wives probably were no deosuled and assocked in college and taught in their feminist literature courses how to intinaiteate doivi divorce and transfeer a mans assetts to bernnake and his neoocn divorce regime zlzzlzllz. See, pardon my englisshsh but when a omwan is assockced in college, even if just th tipppy tip of a cock goes in da anuth, a piece of her soul is deousled and shaved off, and thus she is far more likeley to be loyal to fait dolalrs and work for the fed instad of honorainig her husband family schildren. and as broken homes are the leading cause of fucked up childrens, by assocking womenz in colle,e by da eonoens and even when it is not secretly taped teh womene ez is still deosuled, which adversley aeffects the future of our country, and as mr. bennets said with his moral compass, america is out last , best hope zlzolzzllz

sincerly,

da GB4M
p.s. pleasee support the heartistse gb4m presidential ticket in 2010, with heartiste being the predsidental candiidtae bring forth his humor, love, compaassion leader, insights, and me backing it up with my cheneyesque gravitas lzozlzlz ytahanks in advancnened!!!

Editor’s note: William J. Bennett, a CNN (communist neocon neoconning) contributor, is the author of “The Book of Man (lozozlzl he stole my title great books for men zlzoozlzzo butethexxx): Readings on the Path to Manhood. (to betahood mroe liekeit lzozlzlo)” Bennett is the Washington (inside the belytway with pro feminsist honah goldberg lzozozlz) fellow of the Claremont Institute. He was U.S. secretary of education from 1985 to 1988 and was director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under President George H.W. Bush.
(CNN) — For the first time in history, women are better educated, more ambitious and arguably more successful than men.

(FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY YOU AASSSUFCK, THE WESTERN WORLD IS MIRED IN DEBT UNSEEN UNKNOWN UNDHEARD OF EVER BEFORE AS WOMENZ CREATE DEBT Lzozoozolozoozozo)

Now, society has rightly celebrated the ascension of one sex. We said, “You go girl,” and they went. We celebrate the ascension of women but what will we do about what appears to be the very real decline of the other sex?
The data does not bode well for men. In 1970, men earned 60% of all college degrees. In 1980, the figure fell to 50%, by 2006 it was 43%. Women now surpass men in college degrees by almost three to two. Women’s earnings grew 44% in real dollars from 1970 to 2007, compared with 6% growth for men.

(THE IS BECAUSE THE CNETRAL BANKS FUNDED FEMINSMS TO RANSFER ASSETTS FROM MEN AS ONLY MEN CREATE PHYSICAL WELATH AND ASSETTSS LZOZOZOZZ SO THEY TIAGHT WOMEN TO BE ENTITLED AND SEIZE PROPRTY FROM MEN AND BRIG IT TO BEN BERNAKENEK AS BEN CAN ONLY CREATE DEBT WITH HIS PRINTING PRESS AND THEY NEEDED WOMEN TO CONVERT IT INTO PHYSICAL PROPERTY WHILE ALSO SPYING ON THEIR MEN, ASSCOKCING THEM IN DIVORCE COURT AND ALSO WOEMN ARE MOR ELIKELY TO RAISE SLUTTY GIRLS AND VIOLIENET GANG BANGERS WHICH THE NEONCS LOVE AS IT HELPS THEM GROW THE STSTETA STEATETET STATE zlzozolzzolozllz)

William J. Bennett
In 1950, 5% of men at the prime working age were unemployed. As of last year, 20% were not working, the highest ever recorded. Men still maintain a majority of the highest paid and most powerful occupations, but women are catching them and will soon be passing them if this trend continues.

(YES YOUA SOSSOCUK AS THE WESTERN WORLD GROWN BANKRUPT AS WOMEN CREATE MORE DEBT THAN WELATH IN THIER JOBS OF DESECRATIATIN< DEOCNSTRICTION AND DEBUCAHERY lzozozloz)

The warning signs for men stretch far beyond their wallets. Men are more distant from a family or their children then they have ever been. The out-of-wedlock birthrate is more than 40% in America. In 1960, only 11% of children in the U.S. lived apart from their fathers. In 2010, that share had risen to 27%. Men are also less religious than ever before. According to Gallup polling, 39% of men reported attending church regularly in 2010, compared to 47% of women.

(THAT"S BECUASE JESUS CHRIST AS BEEN USSIFIED AND lzozozlzl OGH WAIT I WORTE ABOUT tHIS:

"wonce upon a time mens wents 2 church 2 find a good wownenez lzozlzlzloz

wonce upon a time mens wents 2 church 2 find a good wownenez lzozlzlzloz to be a wife and mother and faithful honor cherish lzozlzzozlolzozlz

today woemnz go 2 churrhc 2 find a beta or gammamale to pay for their three children forrm three fatehrs who pumped dand dudmped theier zazzez afetr asszzcockcing them lzozlzlzlzo"

lzozozolooz you fuckcity neocon fucktRAD

If you don't believe the numbers, just ask young women about men today. You will find them talking about prolonged adolescence and men who refuse to grow up. I've heard too many young women asking, "Where are the decent single men?" There is a maturity deficit among men out there, and men are falling behind.

"NOMEN ARE NOT CFALLING BEHIND!! IT IS WOMEN WHO ARE GETETING ASSOCKED N THEIR BEHIND BY NEOOCN HEROES LIKE TUCKER MAX RHYMES WITH GOLD MAN SAX WHO TAPES SODOMY SESSIONS ASSCKCOING TEITH GIRLS IN SCERTET AND IS PUBLISHED SIMON AND SHUSTER WOMENZ PORMOETED BY THE NEOCNCON WEEKLY STANDARDTH WHO HERALSDS HIM AS A SIX FOOT TALL HERO repeating his lies about his heiaght as neoncsn like lies exalting assockers zlzozllz!! LOZOZOZOO WHIL IGHNORIG THE TRUE HEROES DYING ON FOREIGN SHOERES IN FORENIGN NEOCN WARS WHILE TH ENOEONCNS TEAHC THE MILITARY WIVES OT LIE CHEAT AND STEAL zlzlollzloolz"

This decline in founding virtues — work, marriage, and religion — has caught the eye of social commentators from all corners. In her seminal article, "The End of Men," Hanna Rosin unearthed the unprecedented role reversal that is taking place today. "Man has been the dominant sex since, well, the dawn of mankind. But for the first time in human history, that is changing—and with shocking speed," writes Rosin. The changes in modern labor — from backs to brains — have catapulted women to the top of the work force, leaving men in their dust.

FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY TEHE WORLD IS BEING CONQUERED BY LEFTIST CRETAORS OF DEBT AND DEBAUCHERY!! LEFTISTS NEOCN CREATORS OF DEBT AND DEBAUCHERY LOOZOZOZO LZOZOZO OMG LEFTIS CRETAORS OF DEBT AND DEBAUCHERY ZLOZOOZOZOZOZOZ Buttehehxtxujiajaja

IN WAR THE MEN WOULD RAID A COUNTRY, KILL THE MEN, AND SLEEP WITH ALL THE WOEMN lzozozl. TODAY THE BNANKERS SLEEP WITH ALL THE OWMENZ IN COLLEGE ASSOCCKING THEM LIKE TUCKER MAX RHYMES WITHGOLDMAN SAX AND TAPING IT SECRTEELEEY ZLOZOOZO, AND THEN INSTEAD OF KILLING THE MEN THEY LET THEM LIVE AS WAGE SLEAVES TO SOOMIZED, DEOSULED WOMENZ WHOE HAD THEIR SOULS ASSOCKED OUT OTHEM BY NEOCONS BUTTSECUAL ""ALPHA MALE (As they define aplha male as the ability to assock others oand place others in debt zlzlzozlz)" zlzoll HEROES LZOZOOZZZOOZOZ

Hanna Rosin: Are women leaving men behind?
Man's response has been pathetic. Today, 18-to- 34-year-old men spend more time playing video games a day than 12-to- 17-year-old boys.
(THATS VBECAUSE THE UNIVERISTIES DEOCNSTRUCTED AND SDESTORYED THE GREAT BOOKS CURRICUCLUME LZOZOZOZLZLZOZOZO THE GREAT BOOSK FOR MEN INSTEAD PRESCIBING MEN RITALIN AND DRUGGIG THME UP AND DUMOPBING THEMD DOWN YOU ASSWIPE GANGLER GAMBLER BENENET G"AMBLING AWAY MILIOPNS INSTEAD OF INEVESTING MILLIONS IN GREAT BOOKS PROGRAMS WHAT" AN NEOCON LIBERAL LZOZZLZOOZ DC STatISTSIT ASSOCKER OF THE GEENRLA PUBLIC VIA FIAT DEBTGTHN lzzlzozozozo)

While women are graduating college and finding good jobs, too many men are not going to work, not getting married and not raising families. Women are beginning to take the place of men in many ways. This has led some to ask: do we even need men?

(LZOZOZLZ YOU NEED MEN TO WORK AS LIFELONG SLAVES TO MPAY OFF THE MASISVE DEBT INCURRED BY THE FMEINISTS "BENAKNKING "REGIMES OF THE WETSTS LZOZOZOZO)

So what's wrong? Increasingly, the messages to boys about what it means to be a man are confusing. The machismo of the street gang calls out with a swagger. (AS THE WEKLY STANDARD EXLATS SECTRIVE TAPER OF BUTTHEX AND BULLY TUCKE RMAX RHYMES IWTH GOLDMAN SAX WHILE JONAH GOLDEBER AEXLATS FMEINSISMS ZLOZOZOZ) Video games, television and music (CRETAED BY LEFTIST NEOEONCS LIKE BILL BENNETT) offer dubious lessons to boys who have been abandoned by their fathers. Some coaches and drill sergeants bark, "What kind of man are you?" but don't explain.

Movies (CREATED BY BULL EBEBNENETES NEOCON FRIENDS LZOZOZ) are filled with stories of men who refuse to grow up and refuse to take responsibility in relationships. Men, some obsessed with sex (SOME OBSESED WIT BUTTHEX LILKKE THE ONES THE NEONECS PUBISH AND WIRE FIAT CASH ADVACED STOO), treat women as toys to be discarded when things get complicated (THIS IS BEVCAUSE THE WOMEN HAVE BEEN ASSOCKED AND DEOSULED BY NEOCNS). Through all these different and conflicting signals, our boys must decipher what it means to be a man, and for many of them it is harder to figure out.

(DUDE__BEING A MAN IS ALL ABOUT CLALING OUT FATSASS BILL BENNTETETS WHO ARE GAMBLERS AND WHO HATE THE SPIRIT OF JESUS AND MOSES AND HOMER AND THE HOERES WAND WHO PRETENDS TO LOVE THEM BY WIRTING A BOOK OF VIRTUES WHICH HE JUST PLAGIAIRZED COPIED FRO OTHERS TO MAKE A PROFIT NEOCONS LIKE THEIR PROFITS FIAT DOLALRS ASSOCKING zlzoozooz)

For boys to become men, they need to be guided through advice, habit, instruction, example and correction. It is true in all ages. Someone once characterized the two essential questions Plato posed as: Who teaches the children, and what do we teach them? Each generation of men and women have an obligation to teach the younger males (and females of course) coming behind them. William Wordsworth said, "What we have loved, others will love, and we will teach them how." When they fail in that obligation, trouble surely follows.
We need to respond to this culture that sends confusing signals to young men, a culture that is agnostic about what it wants men to be, with a clear and achievable notion of manhood.
The Founding Fathers believed, and the evidence still shows, that industriousness, marriage and religion are a very important basis for male empowerment and achievement. We may need to say to a number of our twenty-something men, "Get off the video games five hours a day, get yourself together, get a challenging job and get married." It's time for men to man up.

HY YOU FUCKATRD! THE FOUNDING FTAHERS ALSO BELEIVED TAHT WOMEN SHOULD NOT BE ASSCOKED BEFORE< DURING, AND AFTER MARRIAGE. BUT TODAYS WEEKLY SYTANDADATH REPORTS ON ASSOCKCKERS OF WOMEN AS HEROES< ASND THE WOMENSZ CHOOSE THE ASSOCKOEOEROS BUTTHEXUAL HEROES TUCKER MAX RHYMES WITH GODLMAN SAX LZozOOOZOOZOZL

BAsiclaly the fiat banking masters sned for their tucker mx rhyes with goldman sax asscocker to assock women and deosul them and beernaniky them, making women loyal firtst and ofoertemost to the fita dollar instaed of to man god and family. Then they banking masters ocmmand the owmens to assock their huds=pand in divorce court and transfer mens asseeettss to the nabnking centeral banking firat masters zzoozllzlzlzl

I will say that game is not worthless, what is said and done does matter. However the BS that is tossed about in the PUA world, e.g. “you can get any girl;” “get yourself a 10″ (despite the fact that most PUA students are on the left side of the attractiveness bell curve (less than a 5) is complete BS)!

[heartiste: no issue here, and i have written posts saying this very thing. game will not, for most ugly men, immediately result in them banging 9s and 10s. but it will help them bang 1 to 2 points higher than what they normally bang.]

Guys cannot go right up to girls asking for sex (of course) but they should be able to hold a normal conversation.

[define normal. for most guys, that means asking about where she’s from, or talking about sports and jobs. that ain’t gonna attract any women, even if you are good-looking. in fact, talking like that can kill your chances if you are handsome.]

She has made up her mind regarded whether or not she is attracted to you anyways.

[no. women can literally be turned on by the words you say and the body language you employ. have you never seen a girl’s eyes light up when you teased her or said something that most men don’t dare say? you should try it sometime.]

There have been scientific studies where guys have walked up to girls just asking for sex, some asked if the woman would go home with them, while others asked for a date.

[i have read those studies. i hope you’re not going to lie about the results, because what i read showed that the guys got rejected almost 100% of the time. yes, even the good-looking guys used in the experiment. the girls, meanwhile, had their offers for sex accepted somewhere in the ballpark of 70-80% of the time. this is perfectly in line with evopsych reasoning.]

Those who use game generally experience a placebo effect,

[do you know what placebo effect means?]

and false positives, attributing their success to game (success meaning 1 lay out of 70-100+ approaches for an average looking guy) when just having a normal conversation and paying attention to see if she is engaged/continues it is enough to generate interest.

[if a guy is getting laid 1 out of 100 times without game and just his normal talking self, and then 10 out of 100 times with game, that is not a false positive. but thank you for spewing your insipid anti-game talking points.]

*Ploughing has VERY VERY SMALL returns because the woman has made up her mind about you!*

[i just saw a guy at a club a few nights ago plow a chick who rejected him three times over three hours. eventually, she relented and they began making out. he grabbed her hand and led her out of the club. she was not drunk from what i could tell. so this insistence by you and your ilk that ONCE A GIRL HAS MADE UP HER MIND YOU’RE THROUGH is, not to put too fine a point on it, utter bullshit.]

Ever read a woman’s magazine? It has sections like “get a guy to be into you!” “How to snag him and make him jealous!” What a joke. He likes her based on her looks (nearly the only thing that matters for guys) and personanality.

[true, but remember, men and women are different. men place much more importance on looks and youth than do women. if you deny this, i can only assume you live in a cave like a hermit.]

Women’s preferences with regards to physical attraction are far MORE malleable than guy but it is still there and a guy who is a 3 (maybe 25% of guys) is not going to get a 6 or higher under most circumstances.

[so you admit women’s requirements regarding male looks are malleable, and that other male attractiveness characteristics influence women’s judgment. very good. now you are beginning to see the value of game, for game is nothing more than the projection of those other traits that women find universally attractive in men.]

So guys are that were once really into PUA (like me) just see this stuff as the BS that it is; I’m not saying all gurus are like this but there is a race to the bottom to make money. How can an honest guru compete with another one who is telling naive young guys that they can get get any women and they will do anything to sleep with you in just 10 seconds? Everything is marketed as a “secret,” some hidden mystical knowledge. I feel bad for these young guys who are getting ripped off big time wasting many thousands on such garbage.

[heartiste: there are charlatans in every field. it’s a mistake to use their existence as proof that the concepts which inform the field are therefore invalid or wrong. otherwise, fields like medicine would still be in the dark ages of bloodletting and trapanation.]

“[heartiste: there are charlatans in every field. it’s a mistake to use their existence as proof that the concepts which inform the field are therefore invalid or wrong. otherwise, fields like medicine would still be in the dark ages of bloodletting and trapanation.]”

Yes I agree but the difference is that for the most part the charlatans are MAINSTREAM in PUA; therefore the analogy does not hold.

[heartiste: bloodletting was mainstream at one time. the analogy holds. anyhow, i’ve not noticed that all mainstream puas are charlatans. many are, sure, but there are some who sound legit to me. off the top of my head, krauser strikes me as someone legit.]

(Your blog is useful for the most part though.)

Mehow is one of the names out there. And then there’s of course Mystery who may be the biggest name. What does his web site claim to the naive young guys who are having problems getting women? I’ll quote a few things from Mystery’s marketing:

– “How To Completely Take Over a Room
The Moment You Step Foot In It”
– “Discover The Secrets to Flipping The
Attraction Switches in Any Woman,Taking You From Loser to Lothario” [there’s the secret claim BS that so often arises]

For anyone that is into PUA he knows that Deangelo is another huge mainstream name. Hi site says:

“How to attract BEAUTIFUL women and stand out from the competition”
^
Yeah the left hand side of the male attractiveness curve who read your stuff DD is going to attract beautiful women with “game” alone? Maybe if you are a rock star…

[you seem to have an irrational hatred for game. while game by itself may not guarantee an ugly man will get laid with a hot babe, it will certainly make him a more attractive man, and that this in turn will increase his odds of doing better with women.]

[there’s nothing wrong with effective marketing as long as it doesn’t stray too far from what it claims to deliver. and dyd does deliver, as does mystery, on their basic, fundamental claims. i have used quite a few dyd c&f lines to good effect, and mystery is spot on when he describes seduction as proceeding along a predetermined path from attraction to comfort to intimacy. i think you have to have more confidence in yourself and in other men that most will be able to look past the obvious marketing flim flam and see the useful stuff behind it.
and let’s not forget that you don’t need to pay for anything if your goal is to learn the basics of game and get started on your womanizing (or wife training) career. probably 70% of the valuable stuff is floating around the net for free.]

I think that if you spend some time on these mainstream sites (maybe you have) it becomes clear that the marketing is BS and therefore the mainstream PUA scene is mostly charlatans.

[marketing is enticement, just like game. the marketer is trying to sell a good product that has a high chance of otherwise going unnoticed in the din of discussion. that charlatans crop up in a crowded field and exaggerate the effectiveness of their product is by no means an absolute indictment of the worthy parts of the concepts being packaged and sold.]