Mainstream science says eating too much saturated fat raises cholesterol and the risk of heart disease, so why are some diet trends encouraging people to eat more of it?

Advice to limit intake of saturated fat has been official government policy in many countries, including the UK, for decades.

But many people are ignoring this advice, preferring to believe that saturated fat – which is highest amounts in foods such as meat products, full fat dairy, butter, ghee, cakes and biscuits, as well as coconut and palm oils – isn’t bad for us, even at high intakes.

You’ll almost certainly be having more saturated fat than the officially recommended amount if you’re doing one of the popular low carbohydrate regimens, like the keto or paleo diet, or if you’re following the trend of spooning a butter or fat into your coffee each morning. Eat much more than 100g of fatty meat, pastries, or cheese each day and you’ll also easily get beyond the limit, given by UK dietary guidelines as 20g for women or 30g for men.

Mainstream nutrition science says too much saturated fat raises cholesterol levels in the blood, which can lead to arteries becoming "furred up" and an increased chance of having a heart attack or stroke. But a few scientists argue that saturated fat isn't the issue in heart disease, pointing to chronic inflammation instead.

Low carbohydrate, high fat (LCHF) proponents also – controversially – suggest that the current “low fat, high carb” dietary guidelines are wrong and that obesity and diabetes would be better tackled by eating fat, including saturated fat, alongside reducing carbohydrates and avoiding snacking – a position that’s been challenged by experts at the British Dietetic Association and others, who believe it’s less that the guidelines are wrong, and more that we aren’t following them.

For the general population, most countries’ health organisations recommend limiting fat, particularly saturated fat. UK dietary guidelines, for example, advocate up to 35% of our dietary energy (calories) should come from fat and about 50% from carbohydrates. (It’s worth noting that this could actually be considered a moderate fat, moderate carbohydrate diet, not a low fat, high carbohydrate one).

For saturated fat specifically, the numbers are even lower. The UK recommends that it should comprise no more than 11% of our food and drink calories, while the US and the World Health Organization recommend less than 10%. That would be roughly 20g a day in women (the equivalent of 2.5 tablespoons butter or four supermarket sausages) and 30g a day in men (a quarter-pounder hamburger with cheese, plus four tablespoons of double cream).

The American Heart Association goes further, suggesting a figure of 5-6%.
As headlines are often contradictory and experts seem to disagree, it’s no wonder people don’t know what to believe about saturated fat. What is the reality?

Lynne Garton, a registered dietitian and dietetic advisor to the cholesterol charity Heart UK, says the latest trend to embrace saturated fats over other types is very worrying: we’re already eating too much. UK adults overshoot recommendations by consuming 12.5% of calories from saturated fat, even though their total fat intake is approximately on target. Americans average 11% of their calories from saturated fat and Australians 12%.

“Several factors contribute to raised blood cholesterol, but a diet high in saturated fat is definitely one of them, and this has been confirmed in studies going as far back as the 1950s,” says Garton.

“Furthermore, despite some claims to the contrary, the wealth of scientific evidence indicates total and LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol – often referred to as the ‘bad’ cholesterol – are proven contributors to heart disease."

Garton adds that some people might benefit from eating even less saturated fat than the standard recommendation – specifically those who have other risk factors for heart disease.

Fat replacement

That said, saturated fat isn’t as straightforwardly villainous as was once thought. That's because it is only one of several dietary factors affecting heart disease risk, all of which are interrelated.

Not to mention that if you take some saturated fat out of your diet, you’re probably replacing those calories with something else.

“Some studies have questioned a direct link between saturated fat and heart disease, but these have generally not considered what replaces saturated fat when it is reduced in the diet – a point that’s crucial,” says Garton.

Scientific research backs up this advice. In one study, when 5% of calories from saturated fats were replaced by an equal number of calories from polyunsaturated fats (such as from salmon, sunflower oil, nuts and seeds) or monounsaturated fats (such as from olive and rapeseed oils), risk of death from any cause was reduced by 19% and 11% respectively. Both types of “good” fat substitution reduced heart attacks. So did replacing saturated fats with whole grain carbohydrates such as brown rice and wholemeal bread.

However, when sugar and refined starches (such as white flour) replaced saturated fat, the risk of having a heart attack actually increased.

“Most national nutrition guidelines including in the UK, Australia and the US already recognise that swapping out some of the saturated fat in our diet for unsaturated fat is heart-healthy,” says study co-author Peter Clifton, adjunct nutrition professor at the University of South Australia.

“But to this you can add that it's also probably OK to replace some saturated fat-rich food with whole grains, but definitely not OK to swap them with sugar or refined carbohydrates. This could actually be worse than making no reduction to saturated fat at all.

“Unfortunately, when the food industry began creating lower fat versions of foods such as ready meals, puddings and yoghurts, the sugar percentage often went up as a result, which likely wouldn’t have been reducing heart disease risk at all."

It’s also the case that some types of saturated fatty acids that make up saturated fat are less harmful than others. For example, stearic acid, which makes up approximately half of the saturated fats in dark chocolate, does not raise blood cholesterol. (The other saturated fatty acid – palmitic acid – does, though, so best not to eat the whole bar).

Other research indicates that the “food matrix” is important. In cheese and yoghurt, for example, calcium (a mineral that may keep blood pressure normal) could be why these foods have less impact on raising LDL cholesterol than, say, bacon. It could also help explain the observation that consumption of dairy (including full fat dairy) doesn’t appear to be associated with coronary heart disease. (It’s important to take studies like these sceptically, though, since like many nutritional studies, they show correlation, not causation – in other words, people who eat more dairy might simply have healthier lifestyles overall. It’s also important to note that studies focused on dairy have tended to look at milk and yoghurt, but much less on butter or cream).

Of course, good luck and good genes can go a long way too. “We all know someone whose granny lived to 103 eating lots of butter, cream and drippings,” says Garton. “But on a population level, all the evidence suggests the diet that’s healthiest is one with plenty of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and unsaturated fat-rich sources like nuts and oily fish.

“Rather than focus on individual nutrients, we should be looking at the overall diet and including plenty of these heart healthy foods,” she adds.
In short, that's more advice to eat a healthy Mediterranean-style diet – and steer clear of butter coffees, burgers and bacon.

The Vitamin D Council has had some editorials explaining why, after telling the pale segment of the public they should stay out of the sun, the medical establishment are ducking the research which indicates this direly affects a human’s vitamin D production.

This has serious developmental effects. A lot of the research focuses on autism, but this affects every human, not just the neurodivergent ones. This part of research has enormous gaps, because any symptom in someone who is autistic becomes attributable to their autism, while someone without this diagnosis has more conventional, and more precise, diagnoses of which system is dysfunctional.

But it doesn’t matter, because there are studies on multiple sclerosis which shows this disease decreases the closer one gets to the equator. But that gets lumped into the MS category, and they ignore the bigger picture. Again.

These Vitamin D editorials outline the barriers to new research which so radically contradicts previous advice. And how humiliating that would be to the present power structure.

So, like saturated fat, they draaaaaaaaag out these revelations, giving the impression that research dripped in and they adjusted on the fly.

I know. That jumped out at me. These days there's actually very little saturated fat (if any) in most cakes and cookies unless you make them at home with butter.

Also, this was very inaccurate:

Quote:

That said, saturated fat isn’t as straightforwardly villainous as was once thought. That's because it is only one of several dietary factors affecting heart disease risk, all of which are interrelated.

Actually, it doesn't affect your risk for heart disease at all--at least not negatively, which is what is implied.

My parents are very caught up in the "saturated fat and red meat will kill you" mentality. Recently my Dad said something about it and I said that it turns out that's not true at all, etc. He just went to "Well, our doctor says..." Rather than getting into an argument, I just went home pulled a bunch of studies, some good articles from Nina Teicholz and others and gave them to him next time I saw him. About 24 hours later I got an email that said he and my Mom had changed their views on saturated fat and would be speaking to their doctor about it.

However, when sugar and refined starches (such as white flour) replaced saturated fat, the risk of having a heart attack actually increased.

Without knowing whether I take this observation all that seriously--the usual caveats about quality of epidemiology etc--I'm not sure how you make this statement without considering that "However, when saturated fat replace sugar and refined starches (such as white flour, the risk of having a heart attack actually decreased," must be just as true. However true that might be.

I think there is some risk that people will simply add saturated fat to the carbs they're already eating--the fact that the author sandwiches "pastries" in between red meat and cheese when describing saturated fat containing foods does illustrate just how clueless people can be.

I think there is some risk that people will simply add saturated fat to the carbs they're already eating--the fact that the author sandwiches "pastries" in between red meat and cheese when describing saturated fat containing foods does illustrate just how clueless people can be.

Yes, that's exactly what people will do is add fats to their high carb diets thinking that will cure them and if a little is good, more will be even better.