I have been coding ccluster pretty much daily for a while.
Once I release a new build (possibly within 6 months) with more features and an overall better looking design for the frontpage and some other unfinished areas, we can work on growing this site again.
Until then I guess I can declare us officially ded

>>24336>I have been coding ccluster pretty much daily for a while.
Cool m8, when are you gonna deploy all these improvements?
You haven't changed shit in 4 months.
>Once I release a new build (possibly within 6 months)
What are your proposed changed?
Can spammers still copy/paste spam?
I could literally post the same text or image, and do it again tomorrow.
Can new users post without signing up like facebook?

>>24358>Cool m8, when are you gonna deploy all these improvements?
Most of the changes are still internal. I'm basically making a final version of our engine, which has been rushed and with limited capabilities so far.

>>24361
eventually
I'll probably make ccluster actually open source (as in, you can inspect PHP files directly running on the site). Have to research more on that first though and see if it is really viable

>>

Anonymous17/1/18(Wed) 21:48 No. 24378

>>24359
I haven't admitted anything, you're just assuming stuff

>>

Anonymous18/1/18(Thu) 06:15 No. 24380

in 6 months the worlds best spam filter will arise

>>

Anonymous18/1/18(Thu) 06:15 No. 24381

>>24366
Nice dubs m8
I drunkenly had a run in with a red screen that claimed ccluster was hijacked ect.
I made a post about it on gg
I don't run shitty FF browser, does anyone else?
I would assume that that ooep.co link ya got on curious.wtf would be fucking shit up for your potential revenue yo

>>

Anonymous18/1/18(Thu) 06:30 No. 24382

Bring back >Outlanders Seriously Gad. If the spam gets worse, I was wrong... There has been talk on many different boards on other chans of an exodus lately Mostly caused by Mods being retarded etc This place has huge potential With bare IP posting, with the same rules for posting images as anon id's, etc This place could be great again! There is the problem of gmods being able to censor anyone they don't agree with up, until they create an anon id, and make 250 posts, but the risk doesn't out weigh the benefits yo Are you ready to be flooded with a bunch of digging threads and on going investigations aka Q larping?

>>

Anonymous18/1/18(Thu) 06:31 No. 24383

>>24382
That wasn't susposted to be green txted
Im drunk goys

>>

Anonymous18/1/18(Thu) 06:33 No. 24384

There's a bunch of boards that could use a backup chan in case shit hits the fan over at fullchan now that Q has migrated there with a secure trip..
Which brings me to another suggestion..
A way we could sign our posts like a trip, that requires a trusted 3rd party verification service possibly...
Or maybe a trip on here, even though that went against the original purpose of this chan..
Maybe the larper could have special mod privilege to watermark his ghost instead of a mystery, into something else...
Anyone following this?
Know who Q is?
>inb4 larp
There is a huge following at the moment, a ginormous discussion about it, and lots of larping
Also a bunch of moderation/banning taking place..
We could capitolize on this..
>inb4 we get overrun by disinfo shills
That would be a problem, and also goes against what MC stood for
Why /pol/ would never work here, as its the most moderated board, etc..
Drunk
Brainstorming
[1]
q

>>24336
6 months?
Chan culture will be obsolete in 6 months.
By then no one will use the interboobs anymore.
We will have all grown up and moved on into real life.
Transistors will be into the decimal point value by then m8
You're letting life pass you bye bye chum.

'lets all lay over and die'
t. masters in antisocial faggotory
I surrender.
My faggotry can be realized in real time now.
I no longer care about spam, or moderation.
Double spacing master race has more free time meow......

>>

Anonymous19/1/18(Fri) 07:33 No. 24405

>>24404
You can't trick us. Double spacing is the same as reddit spacing.
Samefag

>>24474
If I try turning outlanders back on, the amount of spam will probably be too much for the current userbase to keep in check. We'll have more spammers posting than regulars browsing 90% of the time most likely and things will go unreported, and there will be illegal images everywhere again

>>24490
No one is here 24/7 to delete the same spam we had last time outlanders were able to post. This isn't about spam, this is about keeping this place a private members only chan.
That is the only difference between this chan and other dead chans.

>>

Anonymous23/1/18(Tue) 08:46 No. 24500

>>24495
Private?
Literally EVERYONE can open an account.
What the fuck are you talking about?

>>24500
Nice dubs
Way to single out one word and ignoring the rest of the sentence.
Totally changes the meaning now doesn't it?
Lets try it with the rest of the sentence, or at least the rest of point.
>private members only
Now to the point:
>members only
Yes, now that's is what both of us described.
That must of been really hard for you to grasp the concept of.
Completely ignoring the whole point that my post was about is what you were really doing.
Now back to where were before you went full autism.
>Bring Back Outlanders
'Excuses'
'Reasons'
Pick 1

>>24516>members only
Is that what makes you screech like a little autist girl?
Seriously?? It takes about 30 seconds to make an account. I fail to realise what is the impossible obstacle that makes you be so annoying with something that just won't happen.

>>

Anonymous24/1/18(Wed) 14:13 No. 24531

>>24527>Look at me!
>>>/4chan/

>>

Anonymous24/1/18(Wed) 14:21 No. 24533

>>24531>no arguments left, let's save face by trying to troll...
Eh, I don't mind. You win!
But no outlanders anyway

>>24538
Its all catch 22
New users aren't going to sign up just to post on a dead chan
New users prob won't want to post on a dead chan anyways
Mods aren't going to be that active if no one is posting, except spammers
I used to stop by at least once a day, sometimes more to delete spam, but am on strike until you bring back >Outlanders
I know we have talked about spam filters, and spammer will just adapt to it, so it seems not worth the time to add things to the spam filter.
Although I think it would be useful to have a duplicate post filter, so its not as easy to spam the same thing over and over.
As to mass banning IP's, this will make posting just like on 4chan, where it's impossible to post unless you're bare IP, so there goes all the security unless a new user is willing to make an account.
I just thought of something, when you do allow outlanders, and they are trying to post from an IP in the b& list, allow them to make one post before making an account..
This too could be abused by the spammer tho, but would require a lot of work to keep changing ips just to spam...
You would have to buy these databases?
I'll check around and see if anyone has a copy they would be willing to share.