Andrew Morton wrote:
> The whole approach seems wrong to me. The kernel lost track of these
> pages and then we run around post-facto trying to fix that up again.
> Please explain (for the changelog) why the kernel cannot get this right
> via the usual sharing, refcounting and COWing approaches.
>
For kvm, the kernel never knew those pages were shared. They are loaded
from independent (possibly compressed and encrypted) disk images. These
images are different; but some pages happen to be the same because they
came from the same installation media.
For OpenVZ the situation is less clear, but if you allow users to
independently upgrade their chroots you will eventually arrive at the
same scenario (unless of course you apply the same merging strategy at
the filesystem level).
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html