Creepypastas have more horror to it, more variety, while SCPs are stuck with the same theme, limiting creativity.

Most SCP articles are boring, at least, when you first open it, if there's no hook to it. All you are greeted with is a wall of text of the same format. Object class, containment procedure, description. Without format screw or intresting pictures, the readers won't bother reading the article and see what it is. Even though it's a intresting one.

SCP articles Explains the anomaly/monster in the horror, while monsters in creepypasta are kept unknown and vague.

Creepypastas can be scary without anomalies, SCPs can't, as it wont make them SCPs.

That's my reasoning on why SCPs suck compares to creepypastas.

Seems like trollbait, especially with the lack of care paid to spelling. Membership revoked. PMs are still borked though, but having two threads locked and moved to deleted should tell the person enough. If they still don't get it, we can progress with disciplinary measures accordingly.

So, I posted a threat about some flaws on the SCP Foundation, and how creepypastas are better, hoping that we can fix the problem. The thread was here. However, because I pointed out the problems of the SCP Foundation, and some stuff that needs improvement, I got my membership revoked. I just want to say sorry, and that I'll never point out any problems with the SCP Foundation, or express any of my opinions again, just incase I get my membership revoked because people disagree with them.

Given that their account of the thread they made doesn't match up at all with what they're saying here, they're probably trolling. Going to make a Disciplinary thread now.