Search

I thought that the way to fight a defamation case is to argue what one said is actually factual and hence if aggrieved person is defamed then he deserves as much. The learned me have said the law is an ass – and it takes a Kejriwal to prove it!!!

Background: Kejriwal’s principal secretary was raided by CBI due to corruption charges. Our lovely Mr.K thought that the actual attack was on him/his office. The fact that he is a anti-corruption crusader and he personally choose the said PS overriding all rules, precedent and corruption charges is an affront to himself. Wait -as per Kejriwal – it was not actually on him – but rather to secure files regarding DDCA corruption that was being handled in his office. How the argument changes from raid on him to a raid to obtain a specific file(s) so easily. And so now topic changes from corruption by PS -> raid on Kejriwal -> raid on Kejriwal’s office -> DDCA files being illegally obtained -> Jaitley being corrupt. Humph – even software engineers will not be able to read and such convoluted logic easily. Going to IIT help’s I guess.