Okay, so there have been recent reports of a male teenager of indeterminate age with occasionally visible vulpine aspects, especially ears and tails consistent with that of SCP-953. The teen so far has only been a scare to the public as he has yet to harm a human, or any animal (as there are no eyewitness accounts of this occurring). Also, while disguised as a human, it appears to be able to hide its vulpine aspects for an indeterminate amount of time, but does occasionally show its vulpine aspects, seemingly not under its own will, but it can hide them again under its own will. The Foundation is investigating the police reports and planning on sending a containment team once the being's presence is confirmed.

Once again, this is an under investigation thing, so that is why I have not given any containment protocols or a subject class. However, if this Addendum is pushed through, the actual SCP Log will likely be classified as Euclid (or maybe Safe as it doesn't seem to have homicidal tendencies), and containment protocols will be similar, but not identical to that if SCP-953.

What you have here is what seems AWFUL close to a self insert, or wish fulfillment style character. No matter what you do with this character, unless you are some kind of god of writing, people will see 'teenage fox boy' and downvote with the fury of a thousand fiery suns.

Not only that, but, well, I should point out, 'wiki' is a really bad name for us. We're not like a normal wiki, where you can edit, or jump on someone elses writing.

Okay, so I guess writing this as an addendum is a generally BAD idea… However, maybe a tale might work out? I mean, I have a framework already made, BUT if I have to take plagiarism into consideration, and the owner of this says no, then I will scrap the project. Thanks for your assistance everyone so far!

Dr Bright, come on. I understand you are an admin here, or at least something comparable, but seriously, calling me a furry? No. That is not how I believe a respectable person should respond to anybody. Secondly, you could try to give constructive criticism instead of just saying that something is a bad idea. At least give concrete examples as to why it is and ways I could improve. By the way, I am not trying to do this out of personal reasons only, I'm trying to expand on another SCP, in a way that makes it more "tame". So yeah, please stop hating on my work (and anybody else's for that matter) and please try to respond with constructive things, not destructive comments such as yours on this thread.

First of all, you are posting with an idea for a mary-sueish furry character which hints at points while mouthing and shaking eyebrows suggestively that it in fact might be your OC which would totally qualify you for a furry. Neither Bright, nor anyone else here are idiot enough to miss the obvious symptoms.

Secondly, it's not an insult. For varying definitions of furry, I count as one. I still think your idea is pure shit, for essentially two reasons. First of all it's a lovey-dovey tuned down and probably oh so misunderstood version of the original kitsune which would most likely make for an article that impresses noone. Second, you're inventing it as an addition to an article that a) wasn't written by you - I'm not assuming for a second you ever talked about this to Clef, amirite? and b) doesn't need any additions because it's a well-received, successful work.

Thirdly, telling you that something is a waste of time is extremely constructive criticism in many endeavours, as it prevents you from beating a dead horse, inventing another defunct perpetuum mobile, or attempting to write your furry OC into an SCP. But, know what? Do it if you want. Neither me nor Djoric nor Bright nor anyone else here have any stakes in whether your article will be successful, and if it isn't (which we are all pointing out as likely) it won't be us getting downvotes.

Just, you know, don't come saying nobody bothered advising you.

EDIT:
This is from your introduction post

I ended up falling in LOVE with 953, in fact I have a running daydream in which I am basically SCP-953-B! Trust me, it gets me through the day.

Kronos, calm down. I don't see Bright calling you a furry anywhere in his post.

As it is, Bright is correct about this sort of idea. Humanoids in general are very hard to write up successfully, even for established writers. If you're really set on writing one, then take a look at this guide. Additionally, I recommend that you read over this guide to get an idea of what elements to avoid putting in an SCP article.

He's not picking on you, he's just calling it as he sees it. And it doesn't matter if you're a furry or not, people would see it as exactly that: weird, furry wish fulfillment. As far as SCP-953 is concerned, it's a Korean fairy tale monster. Having a mundane version who doesn't do anything besides occasionally look like an anthropomorphic fox isn't going to add to the article, and writing the SCP as an independent article probably won't succeed. This site doesn't hate furries or any other fringe culture, but it does hate wish fulfillment through literature (which is why you don't see too many author avatars in tales anymore). Trust me when I say this: this is an objectively bad idea.

I understand what you are trying to say. I will try to change it up a bit, however it is the similarities to SCP-953 that make it what it is. Also I have already contacted the owner of SCP-953 asking for permission, so that is in the works. Once again thank you!

953 is an old SCP, and it's not exactly up to the current standards for site submissions. I really don't think this addition would benefit the article anyway. Furthermore, this is someone else's work; writing a piece that is very similar leads to potential plagiarism issues and comes off as lack of creative effort.

That said, it's good that you're following proper site procedure and asking the author before trying to edit their work.