My issue however, is the fact that people who say that it was a hoax, or conspiracy or myth or whatever, refuse to simply just explain the origin of it.

I'm skeptical and open minded. I'm more than willing to accept a revisionist view of history, if it has explanatory power. All historical myths, misunderstanding, mispprehensions and hoaxes can be traced and forensically studied. I just believe the same can be done here.

The origin of it?

Basically, I think it was the Communist armies (under the command of Stalin whom is of questionable racial heritage) were able to use the combined rumours and exaggerated experiences of Jewish, Homosexual, Gypsy and Communist detainees of the Third Reich who were suffering from post traumatic stress disorder and other mental disorders from their time spent in internment/concentration camps. As well as spite, hatred and a desire for revenge and destruction of those who they thought were responsible for putting them into concentration camps, I think the Communists of Stalin's armies also wanted to have the international community look the other way when it came to the Communists own attrocities before, during, and after the war. Not to mention the Communists would have wanted pay back for a few wars being fought on their own soil. As only the Communist Armies found "death camps" and only "death camps" (funny that) and the allies found concentration camps and only found concentration camps (funny that), it was OK again for the allies because they simply had to take the Russians word for it. The Allies would have had no problems with this because a rival Empire in Germany was no longer a threat, and would end up leaving such a historical stain on that nation, it would prevent the "competing for national expansion" of that once great nation through the "Triumph of their Will". The Holocaust fabrication also "seemingly erased the world's memory" of Hitler's proposal to a Jewish state in Madagascar, which went against the already Jewish/"Allied" agreed upon Balfour Declaration. As we know from history now, the Balfour Declaration was the prelude to the Terrorist state of Israel, and the Zionists would do anything in their power to get it. Even if it meant lying about events before and during the war to promote their own situation - towards the state of Israel.....and now, we see the expansion of the terror state at a huge monetary cost to White Nations/Colonies and through the genocide of the Palestianian people.

It could go into a quite detailed break down though that would be a simple look of it.

There is a moral and perhaps even a sacred duty to all future generations that the truth is brought to light and held onto -for the sake of the German nation and people, or they will be branded as satanic forever.

What would happen in the U.S.if WE ever conflicted in battle with Israel? That is exactly what Germany was faced with when resisting Bolshevik subversion, as well as threatened with the war, all while attempting and succeeding in restoration of its economic health and freedom.

I beg to differ. This "Historical Myth, Misunderstanding, Mispprehension, and or Hoax" cannot be traced or forensically studied. It is illegal to even suggest it is anything but a truth in many countries, suggesting that there is indeed a cover up that some powerful people don't want studied to closely. If they invited research and were open to all questions, I would be much less skeptical of the "Official" story, but the facts don't add up and their don't look to close at our story attitude only lends less credibility to thier story.

Obviously SOME study was done, otherwise there wouldn't be people who question it, yes?

If there was some study, then it is reasonable to expect hard evidence of this.

To not have hard evidence of a myth, misunderstanding, hoax or conspiracy, and continue to proclaim that this is so, AND, to claim this is integral to issues concerning contemporary white is in my opinion silly.

Basically, I think it was the Communist armies (under the command of Stalin whom is of questionable racial heritage) were able to use the combined rumours and exaggerated experiences of Jewish, Homosexual, Gypsy and Communist detainees of the Third Reich who were suffering from post traumatic stress disorder and other mental disorders from their time spent in internment/concentration camps. As well as spite, hatred and a desire for revenge and destruction of those who they thought were responsible for putting them into concentration camps, I think the Communists of Stalin's armies also wanted to have the international community look the other way when it came to the Communists own attrocities before, during, and after the war. Not to mention the Communists would have wanted pay back for a few wars being fought on their own soil. As only the Communist Armies found "death camps" and only "death camps" (funny that) and the allies found concentration camps and only found concentration camps (funny that), it was OK again for the allies because they simply had to take the Russians word for it. The Allies would have had no problems with this because a rival Empire in Germany was no longer a threat, and would end up leaving such a historical stain on that nation, it would prevent the "competing for national expansion" of that once great nation through the "Triumph of their Will". The Holocaust fabrication also "seemingly erased the world's memory" of Hitler's proposal to a Jewish state in Madagascar, which went against the already Jewish/"Allied" agreed upon Balfour Declaration. As we know from history now, the Balfour Declaration was the prelude to the Terrorist state of Israel, and the Zionists would do anything in their power to get it. Even if it meant lying about events before and during the war to promote their own situation - towards the state of Israel.....and now, we see the expansion of the terror state at a huge monetary cost to White Nations/Colonies and through the genocide of the Palestianian people.

It could go into a quite detailed break down though that would be a simple look of it.

Is there anything you can point to which will enable me to verify that?

I mean, something with evidence, not just another article which says the same thing. Something which will indicate WHY someone came to that conclusion? The problem I have is people believe certain conclusions, but when asked for evidence, I only get other people who have the same conclusions. I try to find out WHERE they got their conclusions, and it seems only from other people who have the same conclusion. It seems quite circular.

Nowhere have I seen a process or evidence which has resulted in such conlusions. A lot of people repeating the same thing because they heard it elsewhere.

The "Holocaust is a hoax" myth wreaks of the very problems which holocaust deniers claim the holocaust suffers from. I would imagine that if people really do believe in their position, they would strive to put forward strong evidence.

Hence the reason I am highly sceptical. Hence the reason I COMPLETELY REFUSE to accept this 'issue' as something that whites must tackle to address contemporary issues regarding multiracialism and leftism. The fact that threads such as this exist on forums which supposedly are about white people, is counter productive. Have your holocaust denial site, but leave it out of white nationalism.

Now just to address the laws banning holocaust revisionism. I completely disagree with them, and I believe that no law should dictate what someone must believe. But I have put forward on this thread an alternative explaination as to why this ban may have come about aside from protecting a conspiracy.