City Attorney Dennis Herrera received the second place vote on the official party slate.

There was no third-place endorsement, a slight for Lee as well as Board of Supervisors President David Chiu (who sits on the DCCC) and state Sen. Leland Yee.

“I’m honored and excited,” Avalos told the Appeal. “It’s one of San Francisco’s most important political endorsements and a game-changer in the election.”

Avalos, recall, was a late entry into the race, filing papers only in April. The District 11 supervisor has spent frugally but has also struggled to raise as much campaign cash as his more-moneyed opponents.

Former police commissioner David Onek received the Democratic Party’s endorsement for District Attorney, with Sharmin Bock netting the second-place endorsement.

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi received the lone endorsement for sheriff.

The official party endorsements are ranked from one to three because of ranked-choice voting. Voters will be able to pick up to three candidates for local offices on their ballots in November.

The DCCC consists of 12 elected members from each of San Francisco’s two state Assembly districts as well as a representative for each statewide elected official who is registered to vote in San Francisco.

That means Senator Dianne Feinstein, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and California Attorney General Kamala Harris all have a say in the local proceedings (as did Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom until he moved to Marin). In order to win the endorsement, a candidate needed a majority of votes from the 32-member body, some of whom abstained from the proceedings (or, in the case of Pelosi’s rep, some of whom did not show up).

Avalos won the first place nod for mayor on the second ballot, after Supervisor Eric Mar and Alix Rosenthal, both Chiu supporters, flipped for Avalos and Chiu supporter Arlo Hale Smith abstained. Lee received only two votes — from Dianne Feinstein’s proxy and from Mary Jung — and Yee received but one.

Herrera cruised to the second place endorsement on the third ballot, with votes from most of the Avalos supporters.

“This is a key endorsement in the campaign,” said Herrera spokeswoman Jill Nelson. “Voters care deeply about the Democratic Party’s support when selecting a candidate that matches their values.”

But will this hurt Ed Lee, who still has the benefit of incumbency, as well as unlimited campaign spending power?

Tony Winnicker, spokesman for the Lee campaign, blasted the mayoral endorsement as a “backroom deal by [DCCC chairman] Aaron Peskin and local party powerbrokers that achieves nothing for the Democratic Party.”

“While the Tea Party, Michelle Bachman and Rick Perry dominate the national political debate, Aaron Peskin and local party powerbrokers think the most important thing we can do is rank nine shades of blue,” Winnicker added.

That said, in past elections, the official party nod has proved “pretty darn
important,” said Corey Cook, politics professor at the University of San Francisco and local electoral expert.

“The party label in a one-party town like this one is important.”

The DCCC was until 2008 largely a symbolic body, a organizational rubber stamp whose main goal was registering Democratic voters and ensuring high turnouts at the polls.

That changed in June 2008, political watchers know, when then Board of Supervisors President Peskin engineered a takeover of the committee, kicking off then-chairman Scott Wiener, now the Castro District supervisor.

In the 2010 election, however, the DCCC endorsees for supervisor — Debra Walker, Rafael Mandelman and Tony Kelly — all lost (to, respectively, former Green Party member Jane Kim, Scott Wiener, and Malia Cohen, for those not keeping score at home). It remains to be seen how powerful of a game-changer the DCCC nod will be in a citywide race. [Correction: Cohen was the DCCC’s #2 endorsement, behind Dewitt Lacy. Kelly was not endorsed by the DCCC. The Appeal regrets the error.]

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!

Greg Dewar

I don’t know if Gascon was even eligible, since the party rules are pretty clear you need to be registered party member for something like 1 year before the date of the endorsement and I don’t think he was a “registered Democrat” until a few months ago.

this is why there was no way Jane Kim could be considered last year for an endorsement, despite what some said. Ross was eligible because he shed his Green Party status in 2008 to support Obama.

Greg Dewar

I don’t know if Gascon was even eligible, since the party rules are pretty clear you need to be registered party member for something like 1 year before the date of the endorsement and I don’t think he was a “registered Democrat” until a few months ago.

this is why there was no way Jane Kim could be considered last year for an endorsement, despite what some said. Ross was eligible because he shed his Green Party status in 2008 to support Obama.