Letter: Evolution refutable

I challenge the writer of a letter to the editor headlined "Speaking truth" to produce his best "lines of evidence" for evolution to see if they can be refuted or not. Natural selection (NS) is not upward evolution as he and most people mistakenly believe because the selection always results in loss of DNA information. Science is void of even one example of NS resulting in adding information, which is required for upward (macro) evolution. The creator created all the basic "kinds" with potential for wide variety (species), but speciation is micro evolution (small changes within a kind through selection), never resulting in a higher kind. Dog breeding is a controlled selection process that "evolves" varieties of dogs but you still get dogs, not wolves. The fossil record testifies to the truth of no macro evolution as the kinds appear abruptly and fully formed with no credible transitional fossils ("missing links").

The "billions of years" notions can't be tested and so the phrase "long periods of time" is the writers' and evolutionists' magic ingredient for macro evolution despite all scientific evidence to the contrary. That's not "truth" or science. It's blind faith.

Scientific laws tell us time only results in decay and death — proof we exist under the curses of Genesis 3. The gospel of God is not compatible or reconcilable with millions of years of death before Adam. Evolution is refutable and should be rejected.