Reporting fraud or corruption

FCG Sweden follows Sida's definition of corruption as the abuse of trust, power or position for improper gain.
Abuse includes receiving and offering bribes, blackmail, conflict of interest and nepotism.

Please report if:

You suspect corruption in an FCG project

You are aware that FCG project funds are not being managed in accordance with what has been agreed

You are aware of serious misconduct by a member of FCG or FCG-affiliated staff

FCG Sweden cannot investigate if allegations of corruption or fraud with no connection to the FCG family of companies and their projects.

FCG Sweden cannot guarantee anonymity, but you can protect your identity by using the form below and by not providing any personal details. However if you do want us
to get back to you, consider setting up an annoymous email account for use in the form below.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Hi there!

Project Search

Category

Keyword

Competition date range

From

To

Region

Facilitation of the process of redesigning joint rural development program with three UN agencies (FAO, PAHO, UNDP)

In July 2009 UNDP, FAO and PAHO (Pan-American Health Organization) presented to Sida a Joint Rural Development Program proposal named “Reducción de las vulnerabilidades para contribuir al proceso de desarrollo rural, en los municipios de las Cuencas del río Coatán y Alto del río Suchiate, del Departamento de San Marcos”. The program focuses its interventions in 5 of the poorest municipalities from San Marcos Department. These municipalities are: San José Ojetenám, Ixchiguán, Sibinal, Tacaná, Tajumulco. The proposed program can broadly be said to represent a follow-up program of reconstruction programs in said municipalities implemented by FAO and UNDP, partly financed by Sida, after the tropical storm “Stan” that severely affected said areas in 2005.In November 2009, the assessment of the proposal was presented to Sida's Program Committee EPAC. The committee found that the proposal still lacked demonstrated greater integration between components, and that it needed further clarification as to its stated objectives, outcomes and indicators. The committee thus suggested to support counterparts through a consultancy. The main areas of work of such a consultancy should be to advise on the joint UNDP-FAO-OPS process of elaborating a final program document and its logical framework matrix (with a results based approach), as well as facilitating workshops with FAO, OPS, UNDP, government counterparts and Sida on the same issue.