Decipher that Rembrandt. I intended to be more specific but wouldn't stoop to that level. You and I might meet eye to eye. You give the RR board a bad name, so maybe a third board is needed the B&G #%%@*&*% board. Should not be too busy, but then again you don't need an audience, you can 'handle' things yourself. the bottom line is that your 'schtick' is getting old.

I could not recall it, but thanks for this post because it did two things:
Helped me to realize that your grammar needs some work
Helped me to recall that your posting strategy really is confrontational and boorish
Have a nice day,
Caddy
p.s. Now send me another PM with all of the 'invectives' that you can conjure up (you have plenty of them in your arsenal as I recall but haven't seen them

is useless and fruitless. Your reply to Speed's post made it clear to me. He said it's not the tangibles (e.g. statistics) that count and I agree with him. It's the intangibles and a quarterbacks mechanics:
Leadership ability (getting the goal of the offense over to the offensive players)
Movitational ability (getting the best our of his surrounding cast)
Ability to throw passes accurately

The Rams have 10s of millions of dollars wrapped up in Sam Bradford, for which anyone, whether in business or sports expects a return on the investment. The ROI hasn't shown up yet and posters, at least those who don't let loyalty get in the way of reality, are fed up with it. So, I don't perceive that Speed or anyone else is taking pleasure ('joy') in Bradford's seeming demise, and I suspect w

Maybe we can score enough points on kick-offs, punt-returns, and field goals to win a few games. Sad. But IMHO true. We might be the Jets without the kickers, punters, and returners if we stay with the seeming cast of characters as starters especially at a 'key postion or two.'

Bradford may not be great but he's not as bad as some other areas on this team. Inspire confidence in you? It doesn't in me and I've seen enogh evidence over the last three years to be concerned, including seeing us blow through a few QBs who could do at least as well and perhaps better if given the chance.

My only point was that if we're going to suffer through the rebuilding process why not do so with a somewhat exciting QB who may or may not be the answer but is a great story and excites us as fans. I thought that Fitzpatrick (not as flashy as Lewis or perhaps as the 'kid' from Southern Miss.), Lewis or the kid could do what the NFL wants, namely to entertain the fans and maybe turn out to be a

I didn't think you needed someone to have your back, you seem more than mature enough and capable enough to do so yourself. But thanks. I've been thinking about something, since last season when the Rams began their suck-a-thon. I'm not a psychologist but I played one on tv and I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express (lol). However, as the Rams sink or swim the tone of the rhetoric and the relative

I guess I was marvelling at the fact that a thread that began with an innocent image (the proverbial chicken little) would become a 'mini-dust-up,' without clearly addressing the issue(s) that the poster raised.

The only problem that I see with the 'waiting game,' is that in the meantime we've lost Fitzpatrick, Lewis, and probably Davis and who knows who else. There seems to be a readiness to wait and see and I guess I've lost patience with the wait and see approach.

If you're serious that's one thing and I'll take you at your word and please accept my apologies if I sounded like I was patronizing you. If you're being sarcastic then you've just proved my point, namely that there's nothin like a good fight even if there's nothing to fight about. nm

You didn't use any racial, ethnic, sexist, elitist or ageist slurs. You used a common description of people who might be panicking unnecessarily. So what? Big deal. And, anyone who's become apaplectic about the moniker needs to get a life or move on. Let's discuss the issue not the moniker. Geez!