(Newser)
–
Amid the latest wave of piracy off Somalia, experts are once again questioning whether commercial ships’ crews should be armed, the New York Times reports. Ship owners had been against the idea, fearing liability and worrying that armed crews might be killed by pirates, rather than taken hostage. But increased danger—including threats of vengeance after snipers rescued a US captain—are fueling another look at the issue.

One shipping consultant predicts an international agreement to allow weapons, which could be provided to crews in moments of threat. “The captain declares there’s some elevated level and they open up the gun locker,” he says. But others argue that onboard weapons could draw attacks from those aiming to steal them; and weapons purchases could trigger a mini-arms race as pirates seek to one-up their intended victims.

If airplanes can have air marshalls why not let ships have sea marshals. The crew shouldn't necessarily be armed, but they should all carry guards. Why not a Pinkerton for blue water? In any case, why do we not have international satellites, air support and subs patrolling this area?