Evolution is inherently racist

Darwin considered the Australian Aborigines as primitive and not much evolved from
the ‘anthropoid apes’. He prophesied that the ‘wilder races’,
as he called them, would become extinct because survival of the fittest meant they
would be superseded by the evolutionarily-advanced ‘civilized’ races.1 By advanced he was referring
to his own European Caucasoid ‘race’, of course.

Because of evolutionary teaching, the idea that people with dark skin are primitive
soaks deep into everyone’s unconscious today.2

Look at the subliminal imagery that appeared once again with news reports about
Homo floresiensis.3
Nicknamed the Hobbit, its bones were discovered in Indonesia in 2003, and it has
been claimed to be a sub-human species.

You may not remember the big names but the images will stay with you for a lifetime.
They will convince you of evolution without your mind even getting into gear.

Graphic images of this so-called pre-human hominid have been widely published on
the web (just Google images of ‘The Hobbit’ and you will find plenty).
Notice that these images all portray the Hobbit as … naked, primitive and
black. Of course it’s black—it’s a pre-human.

How many readers would realize that the drawing is fiction, that the only evidence
that they found was some bones? Where is the fossil evidence to support the artist’s
depiction of the Hobbit’s hair length, skin colour or clothing?

So why didn’t the evolutionary anthropologists portray their primitive pre-human
evolutionarily creature as fair-skinned, blonde and European? Because a blonde
creature would not fit the stereotype.

That is why folk are stunned by real-life pictures of real-life people like
the two-tone twins, born in the UK in April 2005. These two beautiful girls
are twins, but one is ‘white’ and the other ‘black’. Personally,
I think ‘white’ and ‘black’ are misleading terms and should
be scrapped. I prefer to use ‘dark’ and ‘fair’.

This simple, factual image blasts the evolutionary stereotype. No longer can we
connect skin colour with ‘primitive’ or ‘advanced’. It’s
simply a matter of genetics—not evolution.

Both girls are fully human—both are made in the image of God.

It’s about time evolution was recognized for what it is—a degrading,
racist, philosophy that is not supported by the scientific evidence, but by clever
artwork. Don’t let them subconsciously turn you into a racist with their subtle
evolutionary icons.

Recommended Resources

Dr Don Batten Format: DVD Length: 37 minutes Audience: High School-Adult Dr Batten
deals with the claimed apeman fossils in the evolutionary tree promoted by the Smithsonian
and shows how the stories do not add up. The fossil patterns fit a post-Flood dispersal
of apes and a somewhat later post-Babel dispersal of humans. Shows how detailed
illustrations have been imaginatively created from fragmentary fossils! While the
content of this popular, illustrated presentation DVD is the same as one you may
have with the same title, it now includes extra features. Not only does it have
a new cover design, it also has English sub-titles, has been ‘re-badged’
to feature the CMI logo and contact details and includes a 3-minute promotional
segment.

Find out what evolutionists don’t tell you about human fossils. The author
gives you the results of his 35 years of fossil research, and shows without doubt
that so-called human evolution is a myth. Easy to read and well documented. (High
School–Adult) 400 pages.

References

Darwin, C., The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation
to Sex, 2nd ed., John Murray, London, p. 188, 1887. Return to
text.

NewScientist editorial (Racism still runs
deep: Even the most well-meaning liberal can harbour hidden prejudice, NewScientist
197(2643):5, 16 February 2008) reported that portraying the early stages
of evolution with primitive dark-skinned African features causes Americans to ‘unconsciously
dehumanise their black fellow citizens by subtly associating them with apes’.
Return to text.

Published: 9 April 2008(GMT+10)

We support belief in an intelligent designer—the God of the Bible. This site was also ‘intelligently designed’. But rather than six days, it’s taken thousands of days. Help us design more information for this site. Support this site