If you look at the parsing window for Romans 8:34, you'll see that that participle has a secondary parsing in which it is a future participle. It is accounting for that secondary parsing, not just the parsing that shows up in the instant details box.

Yes, I now see that it has a double parsing, depending on where the accent was originally placed - ultima or penult.
Only the present participle parsing, however, showed up in the instant details window.