I just got some money from cashing in my EE savings bonds and need to decide where to put it. Bonds seem to have taken a slide lately...is it time to start putting money back into intermediate term bond funds (yielding 4.2% tax free with VTIWX) or just sit tight in a high-yield savings account at 4.5% (taxable)?

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

If you are a dirty market timer, you'll have to keep your own conscience. If you are an allocator, its not unreasonable to average into a diversified bond fund that tracks the Lehman agg. The fed is going to stop raising rates on of these months, and when they do it may be because they realize they have gone too far (again) and need to start chopping. Just don't get too high up on the duration benchmark.

__________________

__________________
"There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest have to pee on the electric fence for themselves."

Since the shortest term money is paying about the same as anything longer, there is no reason to accept duration risk.

If you are getting 4.5% for cash - that's pretty good.* Bond funds are hardly paying any more (and some even less!).* Why accept any duration risk for such a teeny spread?

VWITX is currently saying 3.81% for 30-day yield.* *Tax-free money market is paying around 3%.* That's a better spread!* *3.8% corresponds to a tax equivalent yield of 5.9% or so if you are in a top tax bracket.* Duration 5 years.

Audrey

__________________
Well, I thought I was retired. But it seems that now I'm working as a travel agent instead!

Since the shortest term money is paying about the same as anything longer, there is no reason to accept duration risk.

Au contraire! What if rates start sliding down again? Those who stuck with short term stuff might be sorry. Remember, bonds can and sometimes do deliver attractive capital gains. Ask any shareholder of the big Pimco bond fund how they felt through the nasty equity bear market of 2001 to 2003.

__________________
"There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest have to pee on the electric fence for themselves."

Yahoo finance shows VWITX at 3.8%, but if you add up the last twelve monthly dividends and divide by the price, you get a yield of about 4.2%. So it looks like they are only counting the last 11 dividends to get the 3.8% yield. Can anyone explain why they're only using 11? For example, if I bought the fund on Jan 15th 2005 and held for exactly 12 months until Jan 15 2006, I would have received 12 payments or a yield of 4.2%. Indeed, Vanguard's website lists the "distribution yield" at 4.19% but the "yield" at 3.81%. So which number should I be looking at to make an investment decision?

Brewer's point about capital gains if rates start to decline again is an interesting one. Is the economy cooling off? Will Bernake be forced to start lowering rates?

Quote:

Originally Posted by audreyh1

VWITX is currently saying 3.81% for 30-day yield.* *Tax-free money market is paying around 3%.* That's a better spread!* *3.8% corresponds to a tax equivalent yield of 5.9% or so if you are in a top tax bracket.* Duration 5 years.

Yahoo finance shows VWITX at 3.8%, but if you add up the last twelve monthly dividends and divide by the price, you get a yield of about 4.2%. So it looks like they are only counting the last 11 dividends to get the 3.8% yield.

3.8% is the 30-day equivalent SEC yield. It's really the only way I know to compare different fixed income investments.

Will the economy slow down? Will Bernanke start lower rates?

Who knows. The economy will slow down eventually. Bernanke will lower rates at some point. But he could raise rates for a while longer before lowering rates. And he could wait a good long time between stopping raising rates and lowering them again. And who knows what the longer-term interest rates will do - they have a mind of their own. Bernanke doesn't control those.

My best guess is that he raises for at least a little while longer. Then he waits a while. There might be a big "oops!" as the economy stalls. But the economy might not stall either.

We just don't know! Neither does Bernanke!!!

Audrey

__________________
Well, I thought I was retired. But it seems that now I'm working as a travel agent instead!

Au contraire! What if rates start sliding down again? Those who stuck with short term stuff might be sorry. Remember, bonds can and sometimes do deliver attractive capital gains. Ask any shareholder of the big Pimco bond fund how they felt through the nasty equity bear market of 2001 to 2003.

That would be the conventional wisdom.

A lot of people ran away from bonds with their heads on fire 2-3 years ago because the navs were going to drop through the floor when the fed started raising rates.

I dont think that actually happened, did it?

__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.

I agree, there is a market timing issue that is implicit in my original question. However, Brewer has 100,000 posts, so he must know what he's talking about!* Of course, maybe I'm confusing quantity with quality again...

A lot of people ran away from bonds with their heads on fire 2-3 years ago because the navs were going to drop through the floor when the fed started raising rates.

I dont think that actually happened, did it?

Mmm, treasuries have had minimal returns in the last couple of years because coupons have just outpaced capital losses. If you are looking at a fund with a duration of 4 and a 4+% coupon, it takes a big rate move to actually go negative. But it can happen. Staying on the short side has been a winner in the past couple years.

__________________
"There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest have to pee on the electric fence for themselves."

I agree, there is a market timing issue that is implicit in my original question. However, Brewer has 100,000 posts, so he must know what he's talking about!* Of course, maybe I'm confusing quantity with quality again...

* Yes, I realize that brewer doesnt really have 100,000 posts.

soup, you will note that I declined to forecast interest rates. I think that's actually tougher than forecasting the equity market.

IIRC, you have lots of short duration stuff already, right? If so, tiptoeing gradually into the Lehman Agg isn't likely to upset the boat.

__________________
"There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest have to pee on the electric fence for themselves."

Mmm, treasuries have had minimal returns in the last couple of years because coupons have just outpaced capital losses. If you are looking at a fund with a duration of 4 and a 4+% coupon, it takes a big rate move to actually go negative. But it can happen. Staying on the short side has been a winner in the past couple years.

I agree, but wasnt conventional wisdom that intermediate bonds would lose 20-30% of their capital value when the fed went from 1%-4%+? And I dont think that happened.

__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.

I agree, but wasnt conventional wisdom that intermediate bonds would lose 20-30% of their capital value when the fed went from 1%-4%+?* And I dont think that happened.

No, but only because the yield curve compressed/inverted, which is weird and illustrates how hard it is to forecast rates. I still think we will either see 1) ST rates dropping, or 2) LT rates rising a couple percent. Can't stay flat/inverted forever.

__________________
"There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest have to pee on the electric fence for themselves."

__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.

the decision to buy bonds is a question that relates more to specualting on interest rates than an investment.in an asset allocation plan there is no right or wrong time to buy an asset.all the assets in a well balanced plan should work together and complement and balance each other.a well balanced plan will both protect and or profit in any of the major economic climates we have...bonds=recession , gold=inflation ,stocks or stocks and bonds when the business cycle is good and money markets for times when no catagory is pulling ahead.....if your putting a plan together than yes its time to buy bonds right now..if we slow down to much you will profit when rates come down to try to pull us out......anyone of those catagories bought without the other and your speculating as to where a particulsr catagory is headed and you better be right...planning for un-certainty is alot better and less stressful than trying to rule it out......

Relative to the recent past at least, 5 and 10 year TIPs offer good real coupons right now. 2.24% for the five, 2.34% for the ten year. That 10 year rate has increased 44bp in the last 10 weeks! I suppose it may get better, but these are much higher than a couple of years ago.

Personally, I think >= 10 year maturity straight Ts are a bad bet from any POV other than pure speculation. (For me they would stink as speculations also.)

If you are going to speculate, why not do it in an area where if you are right can get a big payoff?

Ha

__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams

Relative to the recent past at least, 5 and 10 year TIPs offer good real coupons right now. 2.24% for the five, 2.34% for the ten year. That 10 year rate has increased 44bp in the last 10 weeks! I suppose it may get better, but these are much higher than a couple of years ago.

Larry Swedroe's been buying them whenever they go up another 10 bp. He seems to think it's a good deal.

__________________*
*The book written on E-R.org, "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement", on sale now! For more info see "About Me" in my profile.
I don't spend much time here anymore, so please send me a PM. Thanks.

Relative to the recent past at least, 5 and 10 year TIPs offer good real coupons right now. 2.24% for the five, 2.34% for the ten year. That 10 year rate has increased 44bp in the last 10 weeks! I suppose it may get better, but these are much higher than a couple of years ago.

A "real yield" of 2.25% is starting to look attractive. I'll load the boat at 3%+ as that rate will lock in my inflation adjusted withdrawl on the fixed income portion of the portfolio.

I've just got a visceral problem with bond funds right now ... more of a concern about the dollar than just interest rates. I just wonder if the near term of bond funds is more subject to the fed's moves, or the market / value of the dollar ... I lean towards the latter.

Latest Threads

Social Knowledge Community

About Us

This community was started in 2002 as an alternative to a then fee only Motley Fool. The focus of the discussions is on topics related to early retirement and financial independence. The community is moderated to ensure a pleasant experience for our members.