As horrific as it was and with respect to those who lost their lives in this tragic incident, ever since the lies and cover up of 9-11, the skeptical awakened few will always question events like this for the ‘False Flag’ patterning that continuously seems to go unnoticed by the official accounts.

This article is intended to reveal some of the anomalies that were not mentioned or with very limited details, which could present this story in a completely different light.

According to the BBC article on their website titled as ‘Charlie Hedbo Attack, Three Days of Terror’, the story is headed with the below 3 pictures and reads as follows:

At11:30 local time (10:30 GMT) on Wednesday 7 January in the centre of Paris, a black Citroen C3 drove up to the Charlie Hebdo building in Rue Nicolas-Appert. Two masked gunmen, dressed in black and armed with Kalashnikov assault rifles got out and approached the offices.

They burst into number 6, Rue Nicolas-Appert, before realising they had the wrong address. They then moved down the street to number 10 – where the Charlie Hebdo offices are on the second floor.

Once inside, the men – now known to be brothers Cherif and Said Kouachi – asked maintenance staff in reception where the magazine’s offices were, before shooting dead caretaker Frederic Boisseau.

One of the magazine’s cartoonists, Corinne Rey, described how she had just returned to the building after picking up her daughter from day care when the gunmen threatened her, forcing her to enter the code for the keypad entry to the newsroom on the second floor – where a weekly editorial meeting was taking place.

The men opened fire and killed the editor’s police bodyguard, Franck Brinsolaro, before asking for editor Stephane Charbonnier, known as Charb, and other four cartoonists by name and killing them, along with three other editorial staff and a guest attending the meeting.

Witnesses said they had heard the gunmen shouting “We have avenged the Prophet Muhammad” and “God is Great” in Arabic while calling out the names of the journalists.

Sequence of events: 7-9 January.

1. Gunmen attack Charlie Hebdo offices

Police, alerted to a shooting incident, arrived at the scene as the gunmen were leaving the building.

A police car blocked the gunmen’s escape route down the narrow street Allee Vert and the gunmen opened fire.

Journalists and workers who had taken refuge on nearby rooftops filmed the gunmen getting out of the car and shooting at the police vehicle, before driving off.

The police car’s windscreen was riddled with bullets but the officers escaped unhurt.

A police car blocked the gunmen’s escape route down the narrow street Allee Vert and the gunmen opened fire.

The black Citroen is thought to have driven south down the Boulevard Richard Lenoir, before doubling back on the northern carriageway. The car stopped and video footage shows the gunmen getting out of the vehicle and shooting police officer Ahmed Merabet who is on a nearby pavement.

One of the attackers then walked up to the injured officer on the pavement and shot him dead at close range. The gunman returned to the car and drove away with his accomplice.

The getaway car was found abandoned – after apparently crashing into another vehicle about 3km (1.8 miles) north of the Charlie Hebdo offices. Investigators found Molotov cocktails and two jihadist flags in the car, French media report.

The attackers then hijacked another car, a grey Renault Clio, and disappeared.

Paris was put on maximum alert and a major security operation was launched with an additional 500 police deployed to the streets of the capital.

At about 08.45 local time the following day (Thursday 8 January), as police continued their search for the Charlie Hebdo attack suspects, a lone gunman shot two people in the southern Paris suburb of Montrouge.

The gunman, armed with a machine-gun and a pistol, shot dead a policewoman and injured a man before fleeing. The French authorities initially dismissed any suggestion of a link between the shooting and the Charlie Hebdo killings, but later confirmed the two were connected.

A major breakthrough in the hunt for the Charlie Hebdo suspects came at about at 10.30 local time the day after the attacks, when the fugitives robbed a service station near Villers-Cotterets, in the Aisne region, north-east of Paris.

The men – said by the station manager to have been armed with Kalashnikovs and rocket-propelled grenade launchers – fired shots as they stole food and petrol from the roadside stop. They drove off towards Paris in the same Renault Clio car hijacked after the attack on the Charlie Hebdo offices.

The brothers then apparently led police on a chase around north-eastern France, with the anti-terror operation moving to nearby Crepy-en-Valois and the villages of Corcy and Longpont.

In a bulletin informing the public that arrest warrants had been issued for Cherif and Said Kouachi, aged 32 and 34, police said they should be considered armed and dangerous.

French media say Cherif was a convicted Islamist who was jailed in 2008 and had long been known to police for militant activities.

On Friday morning, after commandeering another vehicle in the town of Montagny Sainte Felicite, Said Kouachi was hit in the neck in a shootout with police. A high speed chase ensued as the police pursued the pair along the N2 road towards Paris ending as the brothers sought refuge in a printworks in Dammartin-en-Goele.

On the morning of Friday 9th of January, the manhunt entered its final phase as police closed in on the Charlie Hebdo attack suspects at Dammartin-en-Goele, 35km (22 miles) from Paris.

The fugitives were holed up in a printing firm (4) called Creation Tendance Decouverte on an industrial estate on the outskirts of the town.

Hundreds of armed officers surrounded the building, where Said and Cherif Kouachi – the former bleeding from a bullet wound to the neck – had fled following a car chase.

Elite forces deployed snipers, helicopters and military equipment – sealing off any means of escape for the suspected killers and beginning a tense, eight-hour stand-off.

Just before 17.00 local time, the impasse ended as smoke was seen rising from the printworks amid explosions and gunfire. The two brothers – who had told local media they would die “martyrs'” deaths – emerged from the building, firing at police. Both suspects were killed and two police officers were injured.

It later emerged that the brothers had released a hostage and that another man had survived the incident by hiding in the building’s cafeteria, unknown to the attackers, apparently communicating intelligence to police by text message.

While the Kouachi brothers were surrounded at the printworks, the French authorities had confirmed there was a “connection” between the Charlie Hebdo killings and the shooting of the policewoman in Montrouge.

Then a gunman took several people hostage at a kosher supermarket at Porte de Vincennes in the east of Paris after a shootout. Police quickly surrounded the building.

In an appeal for witnesses to the shooting in Montrouge, police said they were looking for two people: a man called Amedy Coulibaly and a woman called Hayat Boumeddiene (pictured above).

Coulibaly, 32, was then identified as the hostage-taker in the supermarket, who was threatening to kill people unless the Kouachi brothers were allowed to go free.

Minutes after the printworks siege came to an end in Dammartin-en-Goele – at about 17:15 local time – explosions were heard at the Paris supermarket as special forces moved against Coulibaly.

Reports said Coulibaly had just knelt for evening prayers when elite commandos stormed the supermarket, shooting the gunman dead and freeing 15 hostages from the store. They found the bodies of four hostages.

Coulibaly has since also been linked by Paris prosecutors to the shooting and wounding of a 32-year-old jogger in a park in Fontenay-les-Roses, in south-west Paris, on Wednesday – the day of the Charlie Hebdo attack.

His partner, Hayat Boumeddiene, is still wanted by police – although she is thought to have fled France last week. She is believed to have travelled to Syria from Turkey, Turkish Foreign Minister Melvut Cavusoglu said. Ms Boumeddiene and the companion of one of the Kouachi brothers had exchanged about 500 phone calls, according to the French authorities.

In total 12 people were killed in the attack on the Charlie Hebdo offices: eight journalists, two police officers, a caretaker and a visitor.

Information still not admitted by the official media outlets:

1) Zionist hand revealed: Rothschild family had purchased Charlie Hebdo in December 2014

According to revelations from a very credible Dutch Business magazine, Quote, on the 9th January, and confirmed by German Newspaper Neopresse on 19th January, Charlie Hebdo was sold to the Rothschild family in December 2014.

It appears that this acquisition was the subject of heated discussions among family members according to the Baron Philippe de Rothschild, who recently gave an interview to Quote magazine published in January.

“There was a discussion concerning the acquisition that was completed by my uncle Baron Edouard de Rothschild” Philippe said. “Certain family members wanted to prevent the purchase, because they felt the purchase of this daily publication would be seen as giving us political influence. We wanted to avoid that at all costs. We do not want to be seen to be involved in politics, at least not in such a transparent way! In the end the family reticence was overcome”

Baron Philippe Rothschild informed Quote that the acquisition of Charlie Hebdo was finalised in December 2014.

It is clear that it was not met with approval by the whole family in the `underworld’, but it is also clear that the problem lay with the high profile nature of this purchase. As Philippe explained, the Rothschild family does not wish to meddle in politics “at least not overtly”!

The problem it appears, was that purchase of Charlie Hebdo would bring the Rothschild’s subversive involvement to the surface.

It does not need much imagination to create a link between this purchase only weeks before the attack on the daily satirical media outlet that was already a known Zionist platform for hate speech.

Let us not forget that since the attack, the magazine is rumoured to have received 20 million euros from the Government and its sales have boomed exponentially.

It is maybe the same way of thinking that would lead us to question the sale of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre to Larry Silverstein in the summer of 2001, followed by their destruction in an alleged “terrorist” attack in September of the same year. Particularly as it is known now that Silverstein changed the terms of his insurance to cover unexpected terrorist attacks only six weeks before the attack.

This information cannot be presented as categorical proof of Zionist involvement in the Charlie Hebdo attacks but it must make us think and consider all possibilities. It must most certainly make us question the mainstream media narrative that is already so full of anomalies.

Vanessa Beeley, International Correspondent, Medhaj News

2) Investigating French officer, commits suicide only hours into the investigation of this terrorist incident.

Very little information exists on police commissioner Helric Fredou (pictured above), initially in charge of the Charlie Hedbo terrorist attacks. The mainstream coverage of the suspicious suicide was minimal. In fact, every single mainstream report seemed to follow the same ‘line’ that he had just been interviewing the victims of the tragedy and was suffering from depression leading up to the case.

3) However further investigation reveals that Fredou was actually working on a report which had not been released. The report involved Fredou actually talking with Jeanette Bougrab (pictured above), a militant member of the UMP, a far right organization and girlfriend of the murdered director of Charlie Hedbo, Stephane Charbonnier, ‘Charb’.

Despite appearing as the grieving widow of Charb, Bougrap appears to have very tenuous links with the Charlie Hedbo director. In her 2013 autobiography she even talks about the possibility of assassination of Charb… “He is under constant police guard, after threats from Islamist extremists. Perhaps the same fate as Theo Van Gogh awaits him, to be shot in the street by some religious fanatic.”

Bougrab has always had far right links in France. She is known for her anti Muslim stance. In 2013 Panamza dedicated an entire article to her affiliation with anti Muslim, racist, Zionist organizations.

In the autum of 2014 she achieved notoriety due to her close friendship with Patrick Buisson, a known far right ex journalist, who unwittingly recorded Sarkozy and was represented in court by a close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu.

It must also be noted that the first person to come out in defense of Boubrab’s claimes of a relationship with Charbonnier, is Caroline Fourest.

In fact Bougrab’s two most staunch supporters are both known Zionist and far right supporters: Caroline Fourest and Richard Malka (Charlie Hebdo’s lawyer)

4) Just to add and must be considered when looking at all these forgotten facts from mainstream press, is that nobody from the Government in France has issued a single statement regarding the death of Fredou, not even condolences to the family.

In 2012 Fredou was Cherbourg Police Commissioner, during which time the deputy mayor of a neighboruing town was none other than current interior Minister and well known pro Israeli, Bernard Cazenueve.

No wonder there is a media blackout on Fredou’s death – he was interviewing Jeannette Boucrap, who some people call a ‘crisis actor’.

5) Another report from the Foreign Inteligence service (SVR) which appeared soon after the event and was considered disinformation by many, but was that Fredou was tasked immediately after the 7 January Charlie Hebdo Massacre with the examination of documents contained in a small backpack, found in the getaway car used by the killers Saïd and Chérif Kouachi, and which contained the drivers license/identity card of Saïd. This is still hard to verify or even believe that the killers would leave such easy clues, but was still reported by mainstream news as to how the identity of the shooters was obtained)

6) According to SVR analyst in this report say, that what was also discovered by Police Commissioner Fredou in this small backpack, were a number of “cryptic documents” and telephone numbers, one of the most important being a US cell-phone number “directly linked” to former US general and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director David Patreus.

Upon Police Commissioner Fredou’s discovery of this “Petraeus-link”, this report further states, SVR signals intelligence data show he contacted Paris prosecutor François Molins and requested that the Cour D’assises (Assize Court) issue an immediate European Arrest Warrant for President Barack Obama and “other” such American officials to be named within 24 hours.

Within 3 hours of Police Commissioner Fredou making this request, his body was found by his desk in his office with a single gunshot to the head at 0100 hr on Thursday 8 January that was quickly ruled a suicide; and Obama regime officials began flooding the US media with reports that former CIA director Petraeus was in danger of being arrested on felony charges relating to classified materials found in his mistresses possession.

Though this SVR report doesn’t explicitly state what evidence Police Commissioner Fredou discovered to make his unprecedented request to have the American President arrested, it does allude to a much larger conspiracy surrounding the Charlie Hebdo Massacre which not only involves Saudi Arabia, but also the CIA.

Upon Police Commissioner Fredou’s discovery of this “Petraeus-link”, this report further states, SVR signals intelligence data show he contacted Paris prosecutor François Molins and requested that the Cour D’assises (Assize Court) issue an immediate European Arrest Warrant for President Barack Obama and “other” such American officials to be named within 24 hours.

Within 3 hours of Police Commissioner Fredou making this request, however, this report continues, his body was found by his desk in his office with a single gunshot to the head at 0100hr on Thursday 8 January that was quickly ruled a suicide; and Obama regime officials began flooding the US media with reports that former CIA director Petraeus was in danger of being arrested on felony charges relating to classified materials found in his mistresses possession.

Mother (seen in above picture with her son) of Helric Fredou , the Charlie Hedbo Police Commissioner who committed suicide shortly after the Paris attacks in mysterious circumstances, has said that she has been told by authorities that she will not be allowed to look at the autopsy report.

According to the mother of Helric Fredou, police officers informed her that she would not have access to the autopsy report. The Code of Criminal Procedure says that any member of the family can make a request to see the report. She has been denied for unknown reasons.

The Helric Fredou service weapon was not equipped with a silencer. “Why did you not hear anything?” asked the mother. The answer came back: “That the office was well insulated”

According to his mother, Helric Fredou was due to make an important phone call to ‘debrief three investigators’ questioning the immediate family of a victim of the attacks and then check ‘social networks’.

According to police, Helric Fredou would have raised the barrel of his revolver on the front of his head and the bullet would have remained inside his skull.

The attending physician for Helric Fredou with whom his mother spoke to on Thursday 22 January refuses to accept’depression’ and denies knowledge of any ‘burn-out’.

The mother wanted to know who had sent the last call to her son. Police reportedly said ‘we cannot know’ before finally saying no call had been made.

Four top police officers from Paris met her to send their condolences and convince her that he was a “suicide.”

All of these points, point to an officer who had no intention of committing suicide. Why are the family being denied the autopsy report? And what was Helric Fredou’s investigation uncovering at the time of his death? Will we ever know the truth to this, and how many similar stories keep occurring so quickly in such a short time frame?

Three million supporters march in Paris in defiance to the attacks, believing the mainstream media reports.

But most of all, why do so few people not question the official account?

Most critical to note about the Charlie Hebdo Massacre, is that it occurred 48 hours after French President François Hollande, on 5 January, stated to the Obama regime that the Western sanctions against Russia must be immediately ended.

Equally important to note, SVR analysts in this report point out, that French authorities had also been warned about an impending attack upon their nation on 4 January when Saudi Crown Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud delivered the warning to French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian.

The well known image of unity by the western leaders spread over all the Western News papers…

Also to be noted is that the SVR in their previous (7 January) report noted that the killers behind the Charlie Hebdo Massacre were terror operatives of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), a fact confirmed on 11 January when a martyrdom video of one of the killers named Amedy Coulibaly was released by ISIS.

As France today begins to deploy an additional 10,000 troops throughout their country to (hopefully) forestall further attacks, and the West gears up for a fresh rampage across the war-scarred Middle East in response to this massacre, this report concludes, it should not be forgotten that the goal of Islamic violence is to bring down society’s fist on Europe’s Muslim minority – all the better to sweep them up into the waiting arms of al-Qaeda, the ISIS, or whatever form these fanatics invent.

But to who the real terrorist fanatics are, however, and according to the esteemed antiwar American author Justin Raimondo, one needs look no further than the corridors of Washington D.C., and of which he states:

“My biggest fear is that we’ll all wake up one day to find that the monsters are right here, where they’ve always been. By then it will be too late to leash them and put them in their proper place, which is a zoo.”

….was actually an obvious staged propaganda photo opportunity by all those above.