Saturday, September 30, 2006

There’s one thing that I just can’t understand about Canuckistan politics. Why do all of the political parties compete for attention on the exact same issues? I just don’t get it. There must be a stupid magnet hidden in the Parliament Building that attracts all the idiots into politics.

Take the new Green Party for example. These guys are a just a small peanut of a party, I believe that they only got around 2% of the vote in the last election. I watched an interview on the TV once where the party leader was discussing his plans to take some of the gobs of tax dollars we spend on healthcare and cancer research and instead put some of this money into preventing cancers. Since he claimed that 50% of cancers are preventable, and given the numbers that he presented, this makes perfectly good sense because it would lower the amount money we have to spend on healthcare – and ultimately free up more resources overall, which of course could be used for research. Get it? No matter, it’s not really want I to write about.

Anyhow, I decided to surf on over to the Green Party’s website and check out this healthcare plan of theirs a little closer, and possibly consider giving them my vote the next time we have an election. And, gentlemen, you get one guess for what I found when I clicked the link to “healthcare.”

You guessed it, pick up your cigar at the front desk! Yup, the Green Party stated how committed they were to Women’s Health Issues and increasingly blah, blah, blah… that’s when I clicked the back button. You lost my vote, you filthy mangina SOB’s. They are just like all the rest; they can not stop pumping out the femi-filth.

Now gentleman, there is a level of criminality in this that WILL get addressed one day. We all know that women outlive men by 5 to 6 years. We all know that men die more than women from all of the top 10 fatal diseases. We all know already that women use up far more tax funded healthcare dollars than men. We all know this, and so does the government and those running for office. If they don’t know, it should be a crime that such stupid people get to run the country. They will get their come-uppins, whether the angry mob decides it is a rope or a cell is not for me to decide. I personally don’t advocate for any violence. (Got that, you femihags that are reading this whilst already dialling 911).

But here’s the point I would like to make: We have a multi party government system. In Canada we have the Conservatives, the Liberals, the Treasonous Frog Party (Block Quebecois), the NDP – and now the Green Party. It is very easy for a minority government to get elected into office, with say 35% of the popular vote. This has happened in the last two elections, and of course many times throughout history. Lol, what a screwed up situation would it be for the winds to blow juuuuuussst right and have the Treasonous Frog Party become the sitting government – given Quebec’s population, it could happen! The Prime Minister of Canada would be someone who campaigned on tearing the country apart – How screwed up is that?

But what I really don’t understand is how the Green Party could be so stupid to campaign on the same platform as all the other parties. Only the Treasonous Frogs are smart enough to say something totally different, and believe me, it pains me to say that smartest people in the country come from Quebec. But the Green Party? Noooo…. No signs of intelligence there. With 2% of the popular vote they figure they will gain voter popularity by spouting the same filth as the other 3 mangina parties… “We are committed to Women’s Health… We are committed to Women’s Rights… We must do something about women still only getting $0.76 to every $1.00 a man earns.” (That’s right, you treasonous lying manginas in the government, some of us are watching. What color paint would you like for your jail cell? Propaganda for the purposes of creating discriminatory actions against people because of the very nature of their birth is a Hate Crime and you should check the books and see how it can be punished. You filthy manginas!)

I would like to announce that I, Rob Fedders, am going to run for Prime Minister of Canada!

Lol! And I would like to announce that I am committed to furthering women’s healthcare! – NOT!

Nope, screw that nonsense. I figure that I should campaign on the three-fold platform of tax-subsidized lowering of NHL Seasons Passes, a free case of beer a week for every male in the country – ice cold and hand delivered to his door on Saturday night, just before Hockey Night in Canada begins, AND a one time coupon for a free 42” Plasma Screen TV for all the men in Canada! Yes, that’s right folks! Sounds good, doesn’t it?

I won’t even raise taxes!

I’ll just cut all the funding to the treasonous government agency called Status of Women (SOW – snort, snort) and redirect it into my new program. Perhaps I’ll name it the “Status of Weekend Beer and Sports Entertainment Agency.” I’ll also cut all funding to all DV Shelters in Canada, cause lets face it men, what do you care more about? You having a case of beer while you watch hockey on your new TV, or that your little entitlement princess has a place to run to for information on how to screw you out of your home and into a prison? Yup, the TV’s will be expensive, but don’t forget, there are lots of DV Shelters and other DV related offices sitting on pretty choice pieces of real estate around the country and they should fetch a pretty penny.

Now, we often talk about DV being an industry that the government can’t afford to get rid of because of the effects to the economy. Well… yup, you guessed it… Prime Minister Rob, fearless leader, has a plan for that too! Who do you think should be delivering you that case of beer every weekend? I will even provide them with Government Issue uniforms: a T-shirt that says “I’m Sorry!”

Well Gentlemen, what do you say? I might get into power with around 30% of the votes and men definitely have the numbers for that. Yes, if 4 can buy gender specific votes (I’ll give the frogs a pass here), then so can 5 buy gender specific votes!

Sunday, September 17, 2006

.
QUOTE: “The abandonment of men in contemporary society is so comprehensive
that a man who has lost a wife or lover not only suffers from the loss
of that deep personal connection, but from a fairly comprehensive
rejection by society in general. First you lose your wife, then your
kids, and then even your own family turns against you in many cases
(this is a lot more common than most people realize — American men’s own
mothers very often blame them and side with the ex in what is usually a
futile effort to maintain contact with the grandchildren). The
thrashing you get from the police and courts is just gratuitous abuse;
in many cases guys are simply numb to additional pain by that time.”

I would argue that the sudden and total collapsing of love, as it is presented to men, is evidence of its illusion.

Children are raised on it, women can expect it their whole lives in a
watered down sense, but men lose all right to it as they come of age.
Unfortunately, in the West, no-one ever tells them that this is their
heritage as men. They have to learn it the hard way, or go mad refusing
to learn it at all.

Other cultures, particularly those closer to nature, had rites of passage for young men. The rite usually involved sending the stripling
out in the wild, on his own. He would be exposed to danger, expected to
survive on his own, and could expect no assistance. It was a symbolic,
and real, exercise to let him know that he was no longer the dependent
he once was. Young women were never subjected to the same. They belonged
to the community, no matter their age, their fertility or their
ability.

It is a feature of all men who go wild at women and take it out on
innocents, as well as their former intimates, that they are still sold
on the love illusion – they are men that fervently believe they deserve a
place in the bosom of society. The trick is maintained for its utility
in deceiving men into social contracts that are counter to their own
interests.

It’s the same the world over. Every deal won by trickery has a higher
harvest of woe than that done with all cards on the table and intentions
plainly stated.

There are a couple of small lakes not far from where I live. One is
purple to look at, the other is orange. Apparently the difference is due
to a tiny presence of minerals – a little of one element in the purple
lake, and a little of another in the orange one.

If you were to take a glass of water out of each of them, you wouldn’t
be able to tell them apart. They taste the same and look the same. A
simple laboratory analysis wouldn’t be able to distinguish them – only
an advanced lab that can detect minute mineral presence and measure it
accurately would be able to correctly identify which glass of water came
from which lake.

Yet the human eye can spot the difference easily – but only in
aggregate. At the microscopic level, rather than the macroscopic, the
difference is beyond human detection.

The difference between men and women is also impossible to define in
terms of easily spotted differences between individuals. The differences
between the sexes is too easily obscured by simple personality
differences. It is only when you look at humanity in aggregate that the
difference between the sexes is at all obvious. And it is striking.

This is why feminists can say things like “gender is a social construct”
and get away with it. Individuals can easily be made to appear similar,
regardless of sex. The thing is though, “similar” is not “the same”.
Often very significant differences cannot be seen unless one steps back
from the microscopic view and looks again from the macroscopic. It is
only then that the difference is glaring.

QUOTE: "Turn your back on it all, accept the Truth, and Go Your Own Way."

I’m convinced this is the only way to effectively counter the nonsense. It is leading by example.

The real value to me in following MRA/MGTOW sites is that they are the
only places where I get to read intelligent men talking about things
that matter without the media/academic gag firmly in its usual place.
For that alone I value it highly, even if one has to read through a lot
of dross to find a few pearls – at least those pearls are there to be
found.

Schopenhauer points this out too: ” That woman is by nature
intended to obey is shown by the fact that every woman who is placed in
the unnatural position of absolute independence at once attaches herself
to some kind of man, by whom she is controlled and governed; this is
because she requires a master. If she is young, the man is a lover; if
she is old, a priest.”

Furthermore, one also has to realize that women were complicit in
creating “Patriarchy.” As we’ve often pointed out, “patriarchy” is
merely another form of matriarchy, because even Patriarchy is ultimately
for the benefit of women, not men. Women “are” society. Men are on the
outside of society. “The herd” is what society is, not the males on the
outside trying to seek approval to get back in (which they will never be
allowed). Men might have controlled the laws in the past, but women
have always controlled society’s social mores. If women don’t approve,
society doesn’t approve, because women are society. Men are on the
outside looking in.

If men walk away, women will follow. And if we keep walking, they will
keep trying to entice us back. And if we still keep walking, they will
try even harder until eventually women themselves will make it so that
“it” works. Patriarchy only existed because women endorsed it themselves
and were complicit in creating the social mores that made it work.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

QUOTE: "Women “are” society. Men are on the outside of society."

And it is man’s place at the periphery that is our natural home.

While we concern ourselves with laws, government and social mores, we
are intruding upon women’s space and women’s affairs – we are
auditioning for their approval as – nominally at least – their masters
(though it is clear on closer examination that all men in such positions
are actually women’s servants, be they politicians, priests or
husbands).

On the other hand, when a man realizes he is alone in the world, and
dependent on nothing but his reason, his physical strength and his
resolve, his attitude changes. His immediacy to the Absolute could not
be clearer. The thing the free man most craves – his own sovereignty –
is at its closest to being realized. It is this state that I refer to as "One Man's Kingdom."

When I say that I am convinced going my own way is the most effective
way to counter the nonsense, it is not because I believe it will have
any material effect on ‘society’ – it is the effect it has on the man
himself that is undeniable. It is like turning off the television and no
longer reading the newspapers (which are portals into society, or
women’s influence). The calming effect is near immediate. The more one
works at it, dealing almost solely with Nature, one’s own material needs
and whatever other problems that concern only the individual – and
disengaging from ‘society’ in as many ways as possible – it is
surprising how readily, and how happily, the submerged male psyche rises
to the challenge.

Also surprising is how one develops a keener appreciation of company
when one gets the chance, even though it can easily be lived without.

At the end of the day, society will always be there and always be
unconcerned with the welfare of men. Like women who cannot embrace true
independence, many men also shy away from it, exhausting themselves
knocking on the door of women’s world trying to gain admission, never
stopping to look about them and say “it’s actually not so bad out here
by myself”.

The world would of course change if a lot of men started doing this, but
I have no interest in something as abstract as ‘the world’. I am far
more interested in the small world I live in, and how I can adapt to it,
and prosper in it. But I am alone in it always. Not being a woman, that
actually makes me feel more alive.PreviousIndexNext

.
Something I think men will have to come to terms with is that when the pendulum inevitably swings back, what actual benefit do men think this will have for them? Will it bring that fabled equality everyone is seeking? Will everyone join hands and sing kumbaya and live happily ever after? Will the planets align and Heaven on Earth make itself apparent to man and woman alike?

Not likely.

For example, Angry Harry has often pointed out that when
feminists cry of the abuses of women in places like Afghanistan, if you
look at the men, they are treated even worse. And, if you look at the
“abuses” women endured in the past centuries, you will find that in
every situation, men had even worse abuses to endure. It is a feature
of human nature. It is just like no matter at what place, or in
what time, children are always treated better than adults – it’s just
the way humanity works.
.
So, after Feminism subsides, how will things change? Do you really think it will be any different? Women will still be treated better than men. They have been since the dawn of time, and they will be until closing time.
.
This is why it is so dangerous to have the MM try to set up things like
lobby groups and government bureaucracies to oversee the welfare of
men and boys. It is so open ended, and because of the very nature of
humanity, means they could perpetually justify their existence until it
becomes just another oppressive, statist organization that harms
everyone but themselves. It’s so freakin’ open ended and fights a
never-ending battle against nature that how could it not be a
disaster? If I start a lobby group to “stop the tide” I will forever be
able to show the demand for my group is real, because the battle is
still not won. See, here comes the tide again. Gimme more power to fight
it!
.
Far better, if you must support some organization, that they have a
clear mission statement and acknowledge they will disband after
achieving their goal. (Ie. Fighting to remove Bill C-79 from the
legislature).
.
But then, what are the actual goals that men want?
.
No matter what happens, compared to women, men will still be
treated as “lesser” than females. That is simply a feature of human
nature that can’t be changed no matter how many laws are made or
discarded, nor how many lobby groups are formed to fight the tides.
.
Accepting this as true does not mean admitting defeat. It means working
with the way the world IS, rather than fighting against it. It does
not mean men cannot try to create or remove laws which make their lives
better – but no matter what happens, at the end of it all, men will
still be treated relatively worse than the females in society are.

The Serenity Prayer comes to mind here:

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change; courage to change the things I
can;and wisdom to know the difference.

Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time; Accepting hardships as the pathway to
peace; Taking, as He did, this sinful worldas it is, not as I would have
it;Trusting that He will make all things rightif I surrender to His
Will;That I may be reasonably happy in this life and supremely happy
with HimForever in the next.Amen.

What's Wrong With The World -- G.K. Chesterton (excerpts)

Sex and Character -- by Otto Weininger

The Encyclopedia Marxofeminist

Feminist "Equality" Includes The Loss of Free Speech

If you are afraid to speak against tyranny, then you are already a slave. To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer and impossible to ignore. -- JBR Yant

"We can't expect the American People to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism." -- Nikita Krushchev

THE ANIMAL FARM REALITY OF "FEMINIST EQUALITY:"

"Differences [between men and women], including the products of social inequality, MAKE UNEQUAL TREATMENT NOT UNEQUAL AT ALL." -- Catharine MacKinnon, "Reflections on Sex Equality Under Law," Yale Law Journal, 1991

The Demographic Trap

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within." -- Josef Stalin

Back to the Bible

"The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into smaller states and all-national isolation, not only to bring the nations closer to each other, but also to merge them." -- V.I. Lenin

No Thanks - We'd Rather Be Canadian!

"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one" ~Benjamin Franklin

Man-Made Global Warming is a Hoax being used to bring about Global Communism (Globalization)

"Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains." -- Herbert Hoover

Just Doing My Part to Fight Global Warming!

"The threat of environmental crisis will be the 'international disaster key' that will unlock the New World Order." -- Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in "A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind", by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5

Rule by Science

Philosophy Corner

“Dialectical thought is related to vulgar thinking in the same way that a motion picture is related to a still photograph. The motion picture does not outlaw the still photograph but combines a series of them according to the laws of motion.” -- Leon Trotsky

Dialectical Thought is a Cornerstone of Marxism, and Feminism (Because They Are One In the Same)

The Marxist Dialectic's Zig-Zag

Wishing to advance in a room full of people, I do not walk through the aisle and straight toward my goal. Nor do I move slowly through the crowd shaking hands with friends and acquaintences, discussing points of interest, gradually nearing the objective. The dialectical pathway is different. It consists of a resolute forward advance followed by an abrubt turn and retreat. Having retreated a distance there is another turn and advance. Through a series of forwardbackward steps the goal is approached. To advance thus is to advance dialectically. The Communist goal is fixed and changeless, but their direction of advance reverses itself from time to time. They approach their goal by going directly away from it a considerable portion of the time. Lenin wrote the textbook, One Step Forward, Two Steps Back. Chinese Communist schoolchildren are taught to do the dialectical march taking three steps forward and two steps back. If we judge where the Communists are going by the direction in which they are moving we will obviously be deceived -- Dr. Fred Schwarz, President of Christian Anti-Communism Crusade

The Pussy Pass

All's Fair In Love and War

The Matriarchy Lives! (Click Picture)

"I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of 'Women's Rights', with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were woman to 'unsex' themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings, and would surely perish without male protection." -- Queen Victoria, 1870