The Munkacs Hasidic Dynasty which served as stewards of the Schönborn Munkacs estate, whose holy books (Minchas Elazar of Munkacs, Sefer Divrei Torah, Sefer Darchei Chaim veShalom) teach that the ‘evil’ ‘parasitic’ ‘kelipoth’ are at their peak strength on ‘Nitel Nacht’ (Christmas Eve), and justify this hateful theology by claiming that drunk Christians hunt them down to kill them on Christmas Eve, are the same Hasidim who, under Schönborn patronage, sold these Christian peasants alcohol on credit and enslaved them with usury. Est Coelum Nobilitorum. Paradisus Judeorum. Et Infernum Rusticorum. If you don’t deeply contemplate the wisdom of this saying now, you’ll be living what it warns of later.

5 years ago, the details of the hateful tradition of Hasidic Judaism observed on Christmas Eve called Nitel Nacht were revealed to a non-Judaic audience at this space. The writings on Nitel (or Nittel) Nacht have since, predictably, taken on a more apologetic nature. It is being argued that this tradition has no theological basis, is derived solely out of fear of Christian persecution, and is no longer observed. I can assure readers that all three of these assertions are false.

The theological basis for Nitel Nacht, which is a natural extension of rabbinic Judaism, was published for ghetto consumption in the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz in 2004:

On Christmas Eve, known in Jewish circles as Nitel Night, the klipot (shells) are in total control. The klipot are parasitical evil forces that attach themselves to the forces of good. According to kabbala (Jewish mysticism), on the night on which “that man” – a Jewish euphemism for Jesus – was born, not even a trace of holiness is present and the klipot exploit every act of holiness for their own purposes.(“For them, it’s wholly unholy,” Shahar Ilan, Haaretz, December 24, 2004)

It’s difficult to come up with any innocent explanation for the cover of Pope Francis’ book.

We’ve been told that Chagall is his favorite painter.

But why, pray tell?

He wasn’t exactly an accomplished painter according to traditional criteria. Far from it. On Wikipedia you’ll see a portrait of Chagall by the Jewish artist Yehuda Pen that is superior to his own work.

To be frank, “White Crucifixion” is a very crude and childlike painting. Why is it the pope’s favorite painting? What does it show about Christ that isn’t revealed in Gothic reliefs, renaissance sculptures, and baroque paintings?

Dear Therapsid, thank you for your thoughts.

My take is that, aside from Pope Francis’ love of Judaism and its adherents, which is plainly manifest, which does adequately explain the image in my mind, he’s a revolutionary of a crude, bolshevik type. In overthrowing the old culture, bolsheviks attempt to replace it with something, but they’re at the disadvantage of not having centuries of development and refinement to draw from. They have to throw a replacement together quickly.

This phenomenon is readily observed at many venerable old institutions where the patrons have changed over from old money Europeans to new money Judaic East Europeans. In hurriedly making their mark they impose crude paintings, sculpture and architecture of jarring contrast to the former asthetic. Then, there are fellow tribe members and helpers elsewhere in the establishment (i.e. The New York Times) positioned to authoritatively tell us how ‘talented’ these artists are and how ‘great’ their work is (Chagall was backed by Solomon Guggenheim and Irene Rothschild-Guggenheim).

But beyond aesthetics, “White Crucifixion” is a bolshevik ideological representation of Jesus. It has nothing to do with the real Jesus or Gospel. It depicts a “Jesus” who was crucified solely ‘because he was a Jew,’ just as it is alleged that ‘Jews’ are always persecuted, for no other reason than that ‘they are Jews,’ in other words, “Esau hates Jacob,” the fundamental tenet of the protection racket of rabbinic Judaism.

Chagall may have physically left the ghetto, but he was still preaching the message of the ghetto in his art. This is Chabad Lubavitch Hasidism par excellence.

I believe this is why Pope Francis promotes this image, because it empowers the rabbinic racket by instilling fear in ‘Jews’ and shame in non-‘Jews.’

Shortly after the election of Pope Francis we deconstructed his favorite painting, The White Crucifixion by ‘Marc Chagall’ (born Chabad Lubavitcher, Moyshe Shagal) HERE. The image now adorns the cover of his new book.

The “Jesus” that Pope Francis is Vicar of; a concoction of Hasidic Judaism.

Benzion Netanyahu’s middle name should have been Purimspiel. The poor man, a descendant of a long line of rabbis, was haunted by Judaism-fueled mental illness; racial supremacist megalomania, paranoia and impending race-war delusion.

The book that needs to be written and given to the Pope is one that explains how the religion of rabbinic Judaism caused Benzion Netanyahu’s paranoid megalomania which so clearly has been passed on to his son Benjamin Netanyahu BY NURTURE–NOT BY NATURE–and how this sick ideology is causing the other 7 billion of us to experience increasing hell on earth.

Prof. Netanyahu: “The Jews and the Arabs are like two goats facing each other on a narrow bridge. One must jump to the river – but that involves a danger of death. The strong goat will make the weaker one jump… and I believe the Jewish power will prevail.”

Q: What does the Arab’s jump mean?

A: “That they won’t be able to face [anymore] the war with us, which will include withholding food from Arab cities, preventing education, terminating electrical power and more. They won’t be able to exist, and they will run away from here. But it all depends on the war, and whether we will win the battles with them.”

Q: I suppose you don’t believe in the peace process.

A: “I don’t see any signs that the Arabs want peace… we will face fierce attacks from the Arabs, and we must react firmly. If we don’t, they will go on and Jews will start leaving the country… we just handed them a strong blow in Gaza, and they still bargain with us over one hostage… if we gave them a blow that would really hurt them, they would have given us Gilad Shalit back.”

Q: Operation “cast Lead” was one of the worst blows we handed on a civilian population.

A: “That’s not enough. It’s possible that we should have hit harder.”

Q: You don’t like the Arabs, to say the least.

A: “The bible finds no worse image than this of the man from the desert. And why? Because he has no respect for any law. Because in the desert he can do as he pleases. The tendency towards conflict is in the essence of the Arab. He is an enemy by essence. His personality won’t allow him any compromise or agreement. It doesn’t matter what kind of resistance he will meet, what price he will pay. His existence is one of perpetuate war.”

Q: Is there any hope of peace?

A: “Out of agreement? No. the other side might stay in peace if it understands that doing anything [else] will cause it enormous pain.

The two states solution doesn’t exist. There are no two people here. There is a Jewish people and an Arab population… there is no Palestinian people, so you don’t create a state for an imaginary nation… they only call themselves a people in order to fight the Jews.”

Q: So what’s the solution?

A: “No solution but force… strong military rule. Any outbreak will bring upon the Arabs enormous suffering. We shouldn’t wait for a big mutiny to start, but rather act immediately with great force to prevent them from going on…

If it’s possible, we should conquer any disputed territory in the land of Israel. Conquer and hold it, even if it brings us years of war. We should conquer Gaza, and parts of the Galil, and the Golan. This will bring upon us a bloody war, since war is difficult for us – we don’t have a lot of territory, while the Arabs have lots of space to retreat to. But that’s the only way to survive here.”

There is valuable experience [on this matter] we don’t pay notice to. I mean the Ottoman rule over the Arabs. The Turks ruled over the Arabs for 400 years, and there was peace and quiet everywhere. The Arabs hated the Ottomans, but every little thing they did brought mass killings and hanging in towns squares. They were hanging people in Damascus, and Izmir… every town had hanging posts in its center…the Arabs were so badly beaten, they didn’t dare revolt. Naturally, I don’t recommend the use of hangings as a show of force like the Turks did, I just want to show that the only thing that might move the Arabs from the rejectionist position is force.”

Netanyahu gives pope book by father on Inquisition

By Associated Press, December 2, 2013

VATICAN CITY — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has given Pope Francis a book about the Inquisition in Spain that was written by his late father.

Netanyahu presented a Spanish translation of the 1995 book, “The Origins of the Inquisition,” to Francis during their 25-minute private audience Monday.

Netanyahu’s father, Ben-Zion Netanyahu, was an Israeli historian who died last year. A Zionist activist who opposed partitioning Palestine between Arabs and Jews, he was best known in academic circles for his research into the Catholic Church’s medieval inquisition against the Jews of Spain.

“To his Holiness Pope Franciscus, a great shepherd of our common heritage,” the Israeli leader wrote on the inside front page of the book.

An entry from Vatican II Council theological expert, Yves Congar’s, My Journal of the Council, July 31, 1964. He is speaking of a meeting with Oscar Cullmann, a Lutheran ‘observer’ at the Second Vatican Council: