10/19/2008

How despicable. Racists are given a national platform for division in this election more than in any other in my memory. (For those of you whiners, please note I said, "in my memory!") Ideally race would not be an issue, but the racists will have none of it! Under the guise of inappropriately named "equal opportunity" and "equality" these racists fight for special treatment and demand anything but "equality!" Of course in this election one campaign is wielding a racist weapon to be used for bludgeoning anyone that doesn't support its candidate. I am not going to say which campaign but here are a few hints:

Bill "Guilty as Hell. Free as a bird!" Ayers

Rev. "God Damn America" Wright

Karl Marx

Saul Alinsky

Hollywood members of FAG (Film Actors Guild... i.e. "Matt Damon!")

Babies left to die in hospital linen closets

Forcibly spreading a plumber's wealth around

A candidate that cares so much... his own brother lives on a buck a month

But none of those hints matter in modern times, no, no, no. (Or as Jeremiah Wright says, "Naw, naw, naw!") We live in an era of accepted racism and racism, as long as implemented by the acceptable groups is beyond reproach. This racism is a great weapon because any who oppose it are labeled as ... racists, only now the bad kind.

Rachel D'Oro has a piece at Townhall.com about some of Alaska's socially acceptable racists, "Alaska's minorities feel ignored by Palin." The title tells me that Rachel D'Oro is probably one of Townhall's writers that believes Governor Palin doesn't fit her elitist view of what a vice president should be and from what background a vice president should come. I would personally prefer all Republican elitists to splinter off and form a third party (perhaps The Bow Tie party and George Will could be its chairman.) It is truly sad that a person with values and a working class background is reviled for her values and working class background!

Back to the Alaskan racists, who are upset that not enough was done by Governor Palin to grant special treatment to citizens of Alaska based solely on skin color and ethnicity.

"She has no sensitivity to minorities," said the Rev. Alonzo Patterson, a Baptist minister and president of the Alaska Black Leadership Conference. "She's really inciting a lot of African-Americans to get out and vote."

Since taking office in December 2006, Palin has had a sometimes tense relationship with black leaders, who say they've been ignored in their efforts to get more minorities hired in her administration.

Artificial diversity, while popular in the twisted society of today, is just that: artificial. Why do these groups have such a problem with achieving positions based on skills, qualifications, and an ability to do the task? What does skin color have to do with the ability to do any job? I'll move on while I wait for your answer.

In Alaska, the issue of race relations usually focuses on Alaska Natives, who make up 18 percent of the population. Blacks, in contrast, make up 4 percent.

Patterson and Odom say that when they've pressed Palin about diversity in hiring, she gets defensive and even testy.

"If you're going to embrace the entire country, you need to address the issues here," said Marilyn Stewart, president of the Alaska Black Chamber of Commerce and a volunteer on Palin's gubernatorial campaign who has served Republican and Democratic governors. "Most certainly there are qualified minorities who would love to be part her administration. People aren't asking for her selections to be based on color, but because of qualifications."

Imagine getting testy when pressed to make hiring decisions based on race! How can the president of something with the word "Black" in its title say the last sentence in the above excerpt? These groups by their very existence make all such decisions based on color! Special treatment based on color (or gender, or nationality) is the obvious purpose of their existence. Artificial forced diversity creates tension. Again, I must ask why these groups believe that the people they represent are not capable of achieving success on there own merits?

Is it that our society as a whole has been so ingrained (or indoctrinated) that racism is acceptable as long as it is directed toward white people? If so, why don't we let Barack Obama and his Annenberg Challenge partner (and part time terrorist) Bill Ayers convert all public schools to "Social Justice Schools?"

10/02/2008

If you are reading this, you are probably wondering, "who the Hell is Sam Pierce to give pointers to Sarah Palin?" You may just be wondering, "who the Hell is Sam Pierce?" I am a regular guy that would like Governor Palin to be herself and display conservatism, individuality, a separation from McCain, common sense, and several hits against her opponent tonight. The following is what I, as someone who was thrilled with her nomination as running mate to the RINO, would like to hear during tonight's vice presidential debate.

Governor Palin should begin with the normal thank yous and acknowledgments, then wish moderator Gwen Ifill "moderate" success on her upcoming book release. Perhaps she could ask for an autographed advance copy to show good faith and possibly level a wobbly table.

She can wait for Biden to make a remark about her appearance (which I'd say is likely) and reply that we are witnessing Joe Biden "unplugged"... and speaking of plugs, she might ask where the hair came from.

She could also ask that if by "clean and articulate" Senator Biden meant that Obama kept his hands clean by avoiding senate votes and articulated teleprompter read-outs like nobody's business.

When asked about the current financial crisis, Governor Palin will probably stick with McCain's flawed (in my opinion) position on the bailout but I hope she at least points out that her inexperience is once again going to be illustrated, but she wasn't even aware that Franklin Roosevelt had appeared on television in 1929 following the stock market crash, as Joe Biden asserted.

I hope she thinks to mention that it is her understanding that Senator Biden is using a different speech writer than he used twenty years ago, and this one knows his words are being repeated. She should ask if Senators Biden and Obama are sharing Governor Deval Patrick's old speeches now.

When the experience issue is raised, I hope Governor Palin points out that like other Governors that have run for the nation's top two offices, she has experience as a governor. I hope she also asks Senator Biden if he will view himself as a tutor to a President Obama and if he will be Obama's primary source for the "on the job training" Senator Biden, himself indicated Barack Obama would need.

She should explain that her foreign policy credentials hold up against those of the other governors that preceded her and wonder aloud if the critics all believe Presidents Clinton and Reagan would not have been qualified for the position of VICE PRESIDENT. I hope she also points out that Obama's experience is as a grade-school student in Indonesia and as rock concert following speech reader this Summer in Europe.

Governor Palin should take Ann Coulter's advice and makes a point to "tie that idiotic pipeline vote around Biden's neck" when the subject turns to energy. She could also inquire as to how the green team of Obama and Biden intend to allow the electric cars about which they pontificate to be powered. Are they all to be plugged in to sockets that lead back to solar energy plants? How will those solar energy plants be constructed without disturbing some natural habitat? She should ask how their enviro-marxist supporters will react if any sources of energy are implemented in an Obama administration.

I also hope that Governor Palin speaks her mind and points out that she does not agree with Senator McCain on every issue. I hope she can overcome Gwen Ifill's book sales considerations to illustrate to the viewers that it is time that government be returned to the people! Of course loyal Obamorons would not be swayed, but regular people have an opportunity to be inspired and filled with hope... and that hope is not emanating from The Obama Camp.

09/12/2008

This excruciatingly pro-longed election season has been a mental and emotional roller coaster for most that follow it closely. I can only speak from my personal conservative perspective and say that the current situation might qualify as a crisis. This crisis demands action… yet who knows which course of action is in the best interests of our nation? This particular day, September 11, is a reminder of what has been done to our nation and what we are up against. Today’s reminder of the threats we face makes the conservative voter’s decision making even more difficult.

The American Heritage Dictionary defines crisis as:

1. A crucial or decisive point or situation; turning point.

2. A sudden change in the course of an acute disease toward improvement or deterioration.

My personal ride on the “Election 2008″ roller coaster began when Rudy Giuliani was being touted as the front-runner for the Republican nomination and peddled by “political strategists” as the only one that could beat Hillary Clinton. Soul searching and self-examination convinced me that I could never cast a vote for a candidate that believes it is acceptable for a mother to request that her child be killed as a matter of “choice.” Once The Republican Party’s preference was eliminated as an option for me, I began to search for a candidate. I found that I could stand firmly behind two candidates while a few more would have been acceptable if the candidates I agreed with were no longer in the race. There were also a couple of candidates for which I doubted I could actually support.

I chose to do everything I could to help the best man in the race, Representative Duncan Hunter, win the nomination of the party to which I believed I belonged. Energized and filled with “hope” (not Barack “Born Alive, Let Them Die” Obama’s brand) I worked as hard as I could for the candidate I still believe to be the best choice for our country. Conservative ideals were not to be heard on public airwaves as the party and talk show hosts decided to push “moderates” with money. Eventually Congressmen Hunter and Tancredo ended their campaigns, leaving a choice between less than conservative Republicans.

While disheartened, I decided to support the most conservative of the remaining candidates. Unfortunately the combination of early “open” primaries and Huckabee’s hatred of Mitt Romney combined to leave one man standing at the end of The Republican Primary fiasco. The low point in the track had been reached as John McCain, champion of illegal aliens, enemy of free speech, and passenger on Al Gore’s anthropogenic global warming bandwagon was left as the the nominee. Naturally, I felt the nausea sometimes associated with a sudden descent, but this time the ill feeling lingered much longer.

09/06/2008

The Axis of Abortion, showing a certain amount of tactical flexibility, has focused its guns on the one enemy that must be eliminated at any cost. This new target poses a catastrophic danger to the propaganda of the Axis. Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and Emily's List must destroy the target before too many of their subjects become inspired to revolution. If allowed to succeed, this threat might inspire followers to assess the Axis' proclamations about "women's choices" and realize that they have been misled. Governor Sarah Palin must be destroyed before too many supporters of the highest sacrament in the religion of Liberalism notice her example... or Margaret Sanger forbid, follow her example and exercise the "choice" that could weaken the stranglehold of the Axis.

“This is the most anti-choice ticket in history of the Republican Party,” said Beth Shipp, the political director of NARAL. “McCain put someone as outside the mainstream as you can on his ticket, which is Sarah Palin,” Shipp added.

Hoping to drive a wedge between the pro-life GOP base and party centrists who favor abortion rights, NARAL Pro-Choice America plans to raise and spend $10 million to communicate to voters in 34 to 35 congressional districts and battleground states. The group is also targeting independents.

Planned Parenthood, another liberal group, plans to spend $10 million on its One Million Strong campaign, an effort to mobilize “pro-choice voters in battleground states,” said spokesman Tait Sye.

And EMILY’s List, a group that backs female Democratic candidates who support abortion, will spend nearly as much as the other groups on its Women Vote! program.

The Cerberus of infanticide must destroy any prominent woman that dares to commit the sacrilege of giving birth to a child with Down's Syndrome and loving him. This is in addition to having four other children, which in itself sets a dangerous example that a woman might be happy and fulfilled even if she embraces motherhood (or worse yet... because of it!) The Axis needs women in power that will force their teenage daughters to clandestine abortions if they become pregnant. Perhaps the worst war crime against the Axis is the love and support shown to a pregnant teenage daughter who will be allowing her baby to live.

Is Beth Shipp of NARAL correct when she claims: "McCain put someone as outside the mainstream as you can on his ticket, which is Sarah Palin?” Is the mainstream of this great nation not comprised of hard-working people that have family values, morals, and a desire to do what is right? Is it out of the mainstream to believe in the value of a family? I certainly hope that the idea of killing babies for convenience and profit is not what has become mainstream in The United States of America!