It isn't Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you

Main menu

Post navigation

Jan252013

MUSLIMS NEED NOT APPLY

Hiring a Muslim for any job is risky enough, but hiring one for the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom is pure insanity. Not to mention, the fastest way to get a lawsuit filed against you after you decide to fire the Muslim upon realizing there is no such thing as religious freedom in Islam. OOPS!

Boston Review The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom which has spent more than a decade advocating the rights of millions of religious minorities from Sudan to Iran is being sued for religious discrimination. Muslim critics argue, “this is not religious freedom…this is a toxic combination of Christian supremacy and flagrant bias against Islam.”

In 2009 Safiya Ghori-Ahmad, an American lawyer from Arkansas, fluent in Urdu and Hindi with a master’s degree in international development, accepted a USCIRF position as a South Asia policy analyst. The Commission hired her to conduct research on South Asia’s human rights and religious freedoms. According to the complaint, four weeks after she’d been offered the job, and after she had already left her previous job at the Muslim Public Affairs Council MPA), the offer was rescinded. Instead, she was given a temporary 90-day position in July 2009.

While at MPAC, Ghori-Ahmad was a frequent critic of the U.S. government’s efforts at outreach with the American-Muslim community, foreign policy, and counter-terrorism programs. In one such exchange, at the Center for American Progress on April 2, 2009 during a panel titled Challenges Facing Muslim Americans in a post 9-11 Nation, Ghori-Ahmad said:

“I think the language that’s being used is extremely problematic. These hearings are called: ‘Violent Islamic Radicalization,’ ‘Violent Islamist Jihadization.’ You are pushing people away from dialogue and discussion by language like that, because you’re equating violence and terrorism with our religion. Just like other religions, there are bad people carrying out acts of violence in the name of their religion…we don’t ascribe to those beliefs, but immediately are linked.” These statements fit in neatly with MPAC’s well-documented argument that U.S. actions aimed at Muslim Americans are part of a broader “war against Islam.”

The suit alleges that the Commission withdrew its job offer because Ghori-Ahmad is Muslim. Once on the job, according to the suit, her supervisor told her that Commissioner Nina Shea “would be upset that USCIRF had hired her because she was Muslim and had been affiliated with a radical Muslim organization,” and then “suggested ways that Ms. Ghori-Ahmad could limit the negative impression her beliefs and background would create with members of the Commission.”

The suit claims that the supervisor recommended that she push back her start date to avoid certain commissioners and “call in sick” on days when certain commissioners might be in the office, to avoid running into them. This supervisor also allegedly told her to “downplay her religious affiliation,” and “emphasize that she was a mainstream and moderate Muslim” who “didn’t even cover her hair.”

Legal briefs also claim: “Internal USCIRF email and discussions make clear that Ms. Ghori-Ahmad’s national origin and religion drove USCIRF’s ultimate decision to rescind its job offer. For example, Shea wrote that hiring a Muslim like Ms. Ghori-Ahmad to analyze religious freedom in Pakistan would be like ‘hiring an IRA activist to research the U.K. twenty years ago.’”

In an open letter to the Washington Post in June 2012, Ms. Shea claimed that she did not use the words “hiring a Muslim.” She countered that “the first 13 words of this quote—as is clear in the legal complaint—are not mine . . . What is especially problematic are the words ‘hiring a Muslim,’ which imply that I am a religious bigot . . . I voiced opposition to Ms. Ghori-Ahmad because of the bias evident in some of her writings.”

The suit describes Shea as “a long-time vocal critic of Islam as a religion, majority-Muslim countries, and Muslims generally.” She vehemently opposed the Cordoba House/Ground Zero Victory Mosque project, as did the USCIRF’s prominent former commissioner Leonard Leo. She is a prominent advocate for Christians persecuted by Muslims who stated in a 2001 interview, “I believe that religious freedom is universal . . . but at the same time I find that religious freedom is only fully understood in this country.”

For Shea and her Muslim sympathizers, since religious freedom can only be understood by Americans with non-Islamic beliefs, it can only be extended to Americans with those same beliefs. Even American Muslims who present themselves as moderates should have their motives questioned and their records examined.

According to the suit, Ms. Shea wrote in an email that Ms. Ghori-Ahmad’s profession of tolerance could be dismissed as a sham because it would have been “really stupid” for her to have revealed what Shea believed must be her real views. Islam, in Shea’s mind, equals intolerance, and she was personally committed to exposing this alleged Muslim hypocrisy abroad.

In this view, “religious freedom” is anything but a pluralist mission to make the world safe for different ways to be religious; it means, rather, a mission to protect American majority religious interests from perceived threats from minority religions.(NO, the only threat is from Islam)

Post navigation

16 comments on “MUSLIMS NEED NOT APPLY”

Stop taking words out of content and using it to your own benefit… If you are not as thick as you sound then you will do your research before opening your mouth… I have dealt with spastics like you many times and to keep your mouth shut I will provide you the whole quote and the interpretation…

Here’s the entire passage:

“And fight in the cause of Allah with those who fight with you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits. And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from where they drove you out and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque (in Makkah) until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the reward of the unbelievers. But if they desist, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. And fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be only for Allah, but if they desist, then there should be no hostility except against the oppressors.” (Qur’an, 2:190-192)

Let’s look at the interpretation of the above verses. First, examine the historical context. These verses were revealed at a time when Islam was under siege, when the small Muslim community was fighting for its very existence against powerful polytheists. The biography of the Prophet Muhammad, Allah bless him and give him peace, makes it very clear that the Prophet preached peacefully for the first 13 years of his mission. He left Mecca for Medina to make a new start. Even when the polytheists in Mecca were persecuting Muslims and looting their houses, the Prophet hesitated to fight. He only took up arms when God gave him permission:

“Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them.” (Qur’an, 22:39)

I am a non-muslim in a muslim country. Say anything against Islam you would probably end in jail. I wonder why The Europeans and Americans are so willing to give up their rights in own country and be so welcoming to Muslim immigrants. They have no gratefulness in their hearts and even can look u as if you have done them wrong!. Don’t you think it high time your governments should send them back to their holy lands! If we object to certain things in our country, they ask us to go home where we belong. Mind you my generation is 3rd or 4th here. We have worked so hard to be where the country is but we are treated like 2nd class citizens. DON’T U HAVE THE POWER SINCE THESE ARE YOUR COUNTRIES TO MAKE LAW SO THAT THE DISEASE OF ISLAM STOP SPREADING AND NUMBING EACH OTHER MINDS.

alletsa, it is a problem coming from the Left/Communists who hate capitalism and our own countries so much, they ally themselves with outsiders who hate it even more. They also make the fatal mistake of thinking that muslim immigrants are like most immigrants, who want to assimilate into and respect the laws of the country they have chosen to be in.

If they are required to swear on the bible to uphold the Constitution then they are lying if they do. Therefore they can be fired and charges with treason and sedition. If they uphold the constitution over that of Sharia and the quran then they will have a Fatwa on them of death.

Hire a parasite who has to take time off five times a day to bang his head on the ground, is a public health hazard by not bathing, refuses to integrate, fasts for a month, likely to spy on your company secrets, dresses up like a garbage bag (pun intended) and your company is bound to loose money!

They belong in the caves and hell holes they came from, not in a single free and humane infidel society in the entire world, east or west.

The first stupid mistake was to hire her at all! How anyone could believe that a Muslim could have an impartial judgment about non-muslims or their religion is beyond me. To be a Muslim means your brain dead, enslaved, into the belief of a “Totalitarian Ideaology” called Islam. How many times do Muslims have to tell us, that any individual thought, in any Muslim, is an act of apostacy in Islam? How many unfair, unjust rulings, deaths, rapes, committed by Muslims, before our officials declare, “enough is enought” !

As I look at all the “peaceful signs” informing us of the Islamic “Tolerance,” my mind repeats the question, “why oh why, would anyone get the idea that Islam is anything, but an agressive, war mongering, intolerant religion of death and destruction”? The West, continues down the pathway to annihilation, blind, dumb, and deaf; like lambs to the slaughter; and all non-mulsim will be slaughtered … in the end!

There are many no-go Muslim areas in Europe, Britain and other Western countries where it is too dangerous for non-Muslims to enter. WHY are they so dangerous? Because of Islamic teaching. It is an act of TREASON that our leaders have colonized our countries with many millions of Muslims who openly declare their goal is Muslim conquest and the imposition of Islamic sharia law.

Founder of Islam, Mohammed: “I have been made victorious with terror”, “Wage war on the infidel and kill them until Islam is dominant” (Koran 8:39)

“The whole of Europe will become Islamic. Like the army of the sultan we will conquer Rome.”
− Former Turkish Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan, June 2002

“Islam will return to Europe as a conqueror and victor, after being expelled from it twice – once from the South, from Andalusia, and a second time from the East, when it knocked several times on the door of Athens.” Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi, leading Sunni cleric

“One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”
– Houari (Mohamed) Boumedienne, President of Algeria, 1965 – 1978, in a 1974 speech at the UN

“Today, Rome is the capital of the Catholics, or the Crusader capital, which has declared its hostility to Islam, and has planted the brothers of apes and pigs in Palestine in order to prevent the reawakening of Islam. This capital of theirs will be an advanced post for the Islamic conquests, which will spread through Europe in its entirety, and then will turn to the two Americas, and even Eastern Europe.”
− Yunis Al-Astal, Hamas MP and cleric

Abu Baseer in London: “One of the goals of immigration is the revival of the duty of jihad and enforcement of power over the infidels. Immigration and jihad go together.

Sooner or later enough people will wake up and realise the true depravity of islam. When that time comes they will have to return to their islamic shit holes en masse. I cannot wait for that day. A curse on islam and all it’s PC multicult enablers.
And, BNI I cannot praise you and similar bloggers enough for waking up people, even if it is just one at a time.

‘Fitna’ is the Islamic word for ‘disagreeing with Mohammed’. This is a combination of treason and blasphemy. In effect, anyone who disagrees with the Islamic TYRANT of the day, is guilty of FITNA and should be executed.

Mozzies start by persecuting one another, then they persecute dirty kafirs for pleasure, entertainment and profit (expropriating their wealth).

No wonder the ‘New Egypt’ is like the old, only worse! The Egyptian economy is falling through the floor. Pluralism brings prosperity; intolerance brings collapse.

Sounds great in theory Nina, but in case you haven’t noticed, there are many leeching arselifters on welfare rolls or drawing unemployment…..And why not?!…After all, we infidels owe them that as jizya!!……..Best idea is to send them ALL to whatever Pislamic hellhole they originated from!!

PLEASE DONATE TO KEEP BARE NAKED ISLAM UP AND RUNNING. Choose DONATE for one-time donation or SUBSCRIBE for monthly donations. If these links don’t work for you, go here: https://www.paypal.com/us/webapps/mpp/transfer-money-online