Memo from Martin P Burns of PricewaterhouseCoopers
-------------------- Start of message text --------------------
Also, 70% in a test which has simple right/wrong answers *would*
be a poor score, whereas for any complex, real-world problem, where
you're also answering in a very time-limited situation without access to
reference
material (ie real-world problem without real-world resources), 70% would
be good.
The post grad qualification I'm doing at the moment has the pass mark at
40%, credit at 60% and distinction at 65%. The marking standard tends to
mark people at 59% or 64% where their submissions are generally of the
standard, but missing one or two important things (so it's not a simple "1
mark per good point and total at the end").
For real-world problems, though, the required standard isn't "perfection",
but
"good enough", particularly in an entry-level position. If you're taking
someone
straight out of education, then you're assessing potential and attitude -
*could*
they be really good with the environment you're going to provide?
Cheers
Martin
Subject: Re: [thelist] Hiring Eye Opener - Web Skills Testing
I think we might be talking about two different systems, the American vs.
the
British(?) system, in which 70% would equal an excellent score in Britain
and
and a mediocre score in America based on different scoring methodologies.
Roger Newbrook wrote:
> not such a spring chicken myself, when i was an undergraduate 88-91 and
post
> graduate 1995 (UK), 70% was the pinnacle of achievement, anything higher
> meant that you had been touched by the hands of the gods. though, from
> academics i know today (for essays/projects that there are no specific
> *right* answers to), they are being encouraged to use the *full* range of
> marks.
--------------------- End of message text --------------------
This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
individual, non-business capacity and is not on
behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.