Anders Breivik: Neo-Conned

The news media has had a field day in headlining Anders Breivik’s actions as those of someone from the “far Right,” and as actions that are a consequence of Rightist ideology. Yet Breivik is an avid Zionist whose motives were predicated on Islamophobia. His ideological influences are libertarian and “neo-conservative.” He was playing his part, albeit as a loose cannon, in the “clash of civilizations.”

Although the news media has focused on his previous membership in the Progressive Party, his ideological commitment is to Zionism. Why then did not the news media headline Breivik’s atrocity as being that of a “Zionist,” and as a “stanch supporter of Israel”? As is often the case, the fictional “far Right” connection is a red herring. Headlines could have read “Zionist extremist on shooting spree,” “Israel supporter massacres youngsters at Labour camp in Norway,” and the like.

While Breivik advocates banning the Islamic religion from Europe, he seems to have been totally oblivious to the intrinsically anti-Christian nature of Orthodox Judaism,[1] and while he wrote at length on the supposed enmity between “Judaeo-Christianity” and Islam, he wrote nothing of the anti-Christian record of Israel,[2] including the demolition of Christian holy sites, and the common practice of spitting on Christian clergy in the Holy Land. Although he did recognize the historical predominance of Jews in Leftist movements, this is an acknowledgement of the rivalry within Jewry between liberals and leftists on the one side and “neo-conservatives” on the other, the latter being considered by Breivik to be his best potential allies in the fight against Islam. Breivik is Judaeophilic to the extent that he is Islamophobic, writing in his manifesto:

Regardless of what the Jewish communities motives are I think it’s imperative that they take a stance on multiculturalism and Muslim immigration as soon as humanly possible. They have to recognize that “multiculturalism” is the system that allows Europe to be Islamised and it’s obviously not in their interest to contribute to this. Jews will in a much larger degree start to support the ‘new right’ (just like everyone else), who oppose multiculturalism as a means to stop Islamisation, at least this is my hope. In the back of their minds they realize that a Muslim Europe will be more “anti-Semitic” than a Christian Europe. Muslims don’t have the guilt complex that Europeans have. Many Jews feel they are trapped between the ‘bark and the wood’, they are both skeptical of Muslim immigration on one side and of the nationalist far right wing movements on the other side. Nevertheless, time is off [sic] the essence and it is imperative that the European Jewish community without delay take a stance on the ongoing Islamisation. Neutrality on this issue is not an option. The only way of doing this is to back the new right wing (antimulticulturalism, pro-Israel) groups and political parties (also manifested through views such as by moderate Jewish writers such as Daniel Pipes and Bat Ye’or).[3]

Breivik’s opposition to Jewish leftists, as with his opposition to liberals and leftists of any type, is no more antagonistic towards Jews per se than the opposition of Jewish neo-cons towards Jewish leftists. The above passage from Breivik is in total accord with the pro-Zionist neo-con party-line.

Israel & Islam

The only “Right” that Breivik can be said to identify with is the Zionist extreme Right. This calls to mind the likes of the Jewish Defense League, Likud, the settler movement, etc. Breivik’s support for the expansion of Israeli borders north and south also reminds one of the “Greater Israeli Empire” that has always been a basis of the Zionist “extreme right.” He sees Israel as the vanguard in the fight against Islam, writing:

While most people refer to Israel’s security fence as a ‘wall’, the fact remains that less than 5 percent of the barrier is actually concrete slab. The rest is a network of fence and sensors. The fence has cut terrorism incidents by more than 90% since its completion. What was the reason for establishing the Security Fence Area? The Security Fence is being built with the sole purpose of saving the lives of the Israeli citizens who continue to be targeted by the terrorist campaign that began in 2000…[4]

His justification for the “security wall” is the same party line as that of other pro-Zionists, including the neo-con ideologues. The main difference is that Breivik is happy to call this situation ‘apartheid’, while the neo-cons recoil at the word.[5] Was Breivik inspired in his shooting rampage of Norwegian youths more by the example of the Israeli security forces than by the crusader knights whose legacy he claimed to be reviving, albeit only with a handful of members who included two atheists and an agnostic, by his own account?

Clash of Civilizations

Breivik is a product of the “clash of civilizations,” formulated by neo-con ideologues and used by American and Zionist interests to philosophically justify the so-called “war on terrorism.” He is the product of a legacy that is anything but “conservative” in the Western historical sense: he sees himself as an underground resistance fighter against the Islamic occupation of Europe, who, in other circumstances, would be honored as a war hero. He sees Islamic laws and customs taking the place of Western laws. The attitude is no different from that of Sarkozy’s attempts to ban the Burka in public, Breivik writing:

Several recent incidents have demonstrated that Muslims are now trying to apply these dhimmi rules to the entire Western world. The most important one was the burning of churches and embassies triggered by the Danish cartoons depicting Muhammad. This was, down to the last comma, exactly the way Muslims would treat the persecuted non-Muslims in their own countries. The cartoon Jihad indicated that Muslims now felt strong enough to apply sharia rules to Denmark, and by extension NATO.[6]

The Mohammed cartoon saga was symptomatic of the “clash of civilizations.” The cartoons published in Denmark were a contrived provocation against Muslims in order to create a climate of tension. It is such a strategy of tension that Breivik sought in a more dramatic way. The American neo-con magazine Human Events, which by-lines itself as ‘leading conservative media since 1944’, was among the Western media that republished the cartoons.[7] It is of added interest in that one of those instrumental in the 2006 Muhammad cartoon provocation was Daniel Pipes, cited as one of Breivik’s ideological gurus, whom he calls a ‘moderate Jewish writer’ along with Bat Ye’or. Christopher Bollyn, writing for American Free Press, stated of this:

The anti-Muslim cartoon scandal has turned out to be a major step forward for the Zionist Neo-cons and their long-planned ‘clash of civilizations’, the artificially constructed conflict designed to put the so-called Christian West against the Islamic world.[8]

Bollyn wrote that Flemming Rose, the “cultural editor” who commissioned the cartoons for his newspaper Jyllands‑Posten, visited the Philadelphia office of Daniel Pipe’s website Middle East Forum in 2004. “Rose then penned a sympathetic article about Pipes entitled ‘The Threat from Islamism,’ which promoted his extreme anti‑Islamic views without mentioning the fact that Pipes is a rabid Zionist extremist.” Bollyn cited references by the individual whom Breivik recommends as a “moderate Jewish writer,” Pipes having written that a “change of heart” of the Palestinians can only be achieved by their “being utterly defeated.” After three days of Muslim rioting in Denmark USA’s CNN TV network turned to Pipes as their pundit on the situation, who then blamed ‘Islamic extremists’. At the time, neo-con US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice condemned the Syrian and Iranian governments for protests in those states. Pipes appealed to Western liberal secular values in regard to the tumult that was sparked by his Danish comrade:

Will the West stand up for its customs and mores, including freedom of speech, or will Muslims impose their way of life on the West? Ultimately, there is no compromise. Westerners will either retain their civilization, including the right to insult and blaspheme, or not’.[9]

This is the Breivik line that he learned at the metamorphical knees of his neo-con and Zionist gurus. Pipes at the time cited in support another Breivik ideological hero, Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch, which is part of the network of neo-con luminary David Horowitz. Pipes wrote: “Robert Spencer rightly called on the free world to stand ‘resolutely with Denmark.’ The informative Brussels Journal asserts, ‘We are all Danes now.’”’[10]

Now Pipes states of Breivik that “authors and artists” such as himself cannot be held responsible for the actions of those they inspire and, like Robert Spencer and other neo-cons, he reiterates what seems to be their party-line on the matter by giving the example, among others, of how The Beatles’ “Helter Skelter” influenced Charles Manson.[11] However, the connection is just not that cryptic: the neo-con coteries, including Daniel Pipes, have been promoting the “clash of civilizations” and when a foot solider goes rogue and gets out of control they protest: ‘don’t blame me.” Pipes is more than a street corner agitator. He is a visiting fellow of the Hoover Institution of Stanford University, with columns appearing in newspapers around the world. He has lectured at the US Naval War College, Harvard, and others, and appears on leading TV networks. His Middle East Forum has a budget of $4,000,000.[12] In a 2010 interview with the Washington Post, Pipes stated that he is no longer regularly criticized as Islamophobic because of the proliferation of more extreme Islamophobes. This means that Pipes’ and others such as Spencer and Horowitz now look ‘moderate’ because of the shifting of the center of Islamicophobic gravity by years of propaganda. The interview also mentions a particularly interesting phenomenon; the support Pipes had given to the Dutch “right-wing” politician Geert Wilders who, like Breivik, wants to ban the Koran in The Netherlands. While regarding the “new crop of bloggers” as “unsophisticated”, a Washington Post interview states:

Pipes says he shares “the same enemies” with people like Wilders and the new crop of bloggers. “We’re in the same trench but we have different views of what the problem is. We both see an attempt to impose Islamic law, sharia, in the West. We are both against it, and want to maintain Western civilization. But we understand the nature of the problem differently.”

Important distinction, in your eyes?[13]

It is just this type of alliance between the neo-cons, Zionists and the European so-called ‘right-wing’ that Breivik regards as a basis for the anti-Islamic civil war he hoped to foment in Europe. It is not an isolated phenomenon. The well-publicized English Defense League’s anti-Muslim demonstrations and riots are marked by the number of Israeli flags appearing amidst their shaven headed ranks.[14] Breivik regards the EDL as one of the better organizations, writing:

The British EDL seems to be the first youth organization that has finally understood this. Sure, in the beginning it was the occasional egg heads who shouted racist slogans and did Nazi salutes but these individuals were kicked out. An organization such as the EDL has the moral high ground and can easily justify their political standpoints as they publicly oppose racism and authoritarianism.[15]

According to the anti-Zionist former Israeli Gilad Atzmon, the EDL has formed a “Jewish Division,” which the London Jewish Chronicle states immediately drew “hundreds” of followers. The Division is led by Roberta Moore, who was interviewed by the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, and boasted of how the ‘Jews were exploiting’ the EDL:

Roberta Moore, aged 39, the leader of the Jewish Division, admitted this week to Ha‘aretz that it is ‘actually the Jewish Division that exploits the EDL’. In an interview with the Israeli newspaper on 13 July 2010, she said: “They [the EDL] think the league is exploiting us, while it is really we who initiated the Jewish Division. If anything, we are exploiting them.”[16]

Of the previously mentioned Bat Ye’or, a Jewish woman of Egyptian birth, resident in Britain, she specializes in writing of Jewish experiences in Muslim states.[17] Her theme of “Eurabia” is a condemnation of relations between Europe and the Arab states.[18] It is a concept that was taken up by Breivik. Ye’or contends that Eurabia is a development of ‘Nazi’ and ‘fascist’ origins in alliance with radical Arabs, and has placed European states in a foreign policy position inimical to the interests of both Israel and the USA. In other words, it is indicative of Europe as a new force rather than as a lackey to the USA. This Eurabia was formalized in 1974 in Paris in an association called Euro-Arab Dialogue. Ye’or has outlined her views in many articles, one of which was published in the neo-con National Review.[19] She has attracted the support of neo-cons such as Robert Spencer. From a Western cultural perspective, the concept of Eurabia so abhorred to Ye’or and other neo-cons, plutocrats and Zionists, is hopeful. The relations souring the Arab states and the West are of intrusive origins and could be addressed diplomatically. The origins of poisoned relations between the West and the Arabs will now be considered.

Related

About the Author

Kerry R Bolton is a Fellow of the Academy of Social and Political Research (Athens), and the Institute for Higher Studies on Geopolitics and Auxiliary Sciences (Lisbon). He has doctorates in theological studies, Ph.D. h.c. and certifications in psychology and social work studies. He has been widely published by the scholarly and wider media on a variety of subjects.

Nice try. His “support” for Israel was only a tiny element of a much larger culturally-Christian and conservative worldview. You’re implying that it’s to the contrary, that it is actually a central element. His writings do not support it at all.

He also wrote that India and Serbia are justified in fighting against Islamic militants. Why not change the above line to “India supporter massacres youngsters at Labour camp in Norway”, or even “Serbia supporter massacres youngsters at Labour camp in Norway.”

Because you’re hateful, perhaps as hateful as Breivik.

Elle

The only ‘world view’ the mass murderer has expounded and enthusiastically espoused is the Zionist one. His ‘manifesto’ contains almost 400 laudatory references each to Jews and to Israel. The Serbia and India reference is a one-off ‘aside’, as is his very half-hearted, almost jocose, reference to his Christianity, which, he says, is such that he has no particular relationship with Christ. I cannot see a Christian ‘world view’ in that. No, James: Dr Bolton is nothing like hateful, except perhaps to people like you, who go for the throat of anyone who does not bow to Zionism. (Or are you one of the thousands being paid to attack as meanly as possible anyone who dares voice a view that does not flatter Zionism?)

Andrew

Clear view on terrorist Breivik. Terrorist! A man who killed 76 people! Personally I think he is a product of “Israel” and it’s so clear that he is a clash of civilization himself.

jose

so long as islam uses threats against those that criticize it and it continues to demand special treatment along with its violence and intolerance towards non muslims and women, people will continue to fight it. tho i do not agree with Breiviks methods i empathize with his frustration towards multiculturalist elites who continue their path of cultural suicide. u dont move to europe to change its culture, u assimilate and integrate with it. islam does the opposite, i fear Breivik is an example of things to come. people r fed up with islam and its incompatability with democracy and freedom of speech.

Edward

I think there is a little bit of Superman about Breivik, being in two places and “accomplishing” so much in such a short space of time. Cospiracy theorists, where are you?

Elle

Right here, Edward! Have you read this absurd ‘manifesto’? It quite obviously is not written by a 32-year-old Norwegian for whom English is a second language. Not once is there so much as a slip in idiom or mark of ‘foreign accent’. Sometimes, the spelling is English, other times American. My strong impression is that someone hurriedly pulled out everything, from a dedicated useful-propaganda data base or two, that maligns Muslims and Islam. And this was just ‘background’ for the hair-raising call to arms against Western countries’ governments that begins after p.900. Sometimes, this ‘manifesto’ is almost comical: A Zionist plan to defeat at once the anti-Israel, pro-Muslim European ‘right wing’ and the ‘cultural Marxists’ comes up in decidedly Jewish-English structures; and I must wonder how Breivik managed that: ‘The NS are generally pro Muslim and anti Jewish. They should know that we will defend our right wing Jewish and other non-Muslim minority groups, who have fought by our side with our lives as they will do the same for us. It is still too early to tell how the situation will develop. A relationship is always reciprocal so we, the pro-multiethnicity and pro-Israel/Jewish factions, do in fact expect future support from all non-Muslim right wing minority groups and indirect support from the Israeli right wing. We will rely on their support in order to be able to dominate the European right wing for the future -because if we fail, they will lose their only interest groups and allies’ (pp.1127 – 1128).

The enormity of the crimes of this Christian Zionist with his extreme rightist agenda and his well-planned and systematic slaughter of so many young people baffles many of us in Norway and around the world. Norway is a free and democratic country where people can express their views. There is a high level of tolerance and acceptance of people of European and non-European origin who have different religions, modes of living and social ways. These things make Norway a brilliant example of how a just socio-political system should be.

At the same time, I am also aware of the dangers and pressures that non-European communities in Norway and the rest of the western world could have faced if this mass murderer were not a blond native Norwegian but a non-European. We know how the non-white communities, especially Muslims, were treated throughout Europe and North America after the 9/11. So, no matter who was responsible for the 9/11, all Muslim communities had to face terror and insults at the hands of the white people. I had seen and also experienced myself how the Muslims were subjected to much humiliation in Norway at the hands of some people.

Edward

“These things make Norway a brilliant example of how a just socio-political system should be.” Maybe we should judge by results. It seems that these days the results produced by Norway have been less than edifying with their involvement in Afghanstan, Iraq, Libya and now at home. But maybe Afghanstan, Iraq, Libya are too far away to be worried about the their pain an suffering.

Edward, you are right when you mention Norway’s involvement in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. Norway has been a loyal ally and a Yes-man to American global politics. All the Norwegian governments after the Second World War have been staunch supporters of the policies of the Zionist State of Israel. Norway’s pro-Israel and pro-Zionist parties like Christian People’s Party and the ultra right-wing Progress Party have been supporters of Israeli wars, its colonisation of the occupied territories, its brutal suppression of the people of Palestine, and the massacres of the Palestinians whenever they took place. Along with some fundamental Christians and ordinary believing Christians, they supported Israeli invasion of Gaza and the massacre in 2009 under the oft-repeated mantra or the notorious deceptive gimmick that ‘Israel has a right to defend itself itself’. And full stop; that’s the end of the matter.

While Norway has a subservient role in the foreign policy matters due to dominant influence of the hegemon and its NATO membership, the welfare and egalitarian system within the borders of Norway needs praise and emulation. In fact that was the point I had made in my first comment. However, what an individual or a group can do or what sort of carnage Breivik resorted to is something no one can really control. Norway is an open and democratic state and its people are mostly non-aggressive and peaceful citizens.

Edward

Your reply raises the question of individual responsibilty versus state responsibility. Where does the responsibility deficit we clearly see in modern Western society lie? Maybe we we need to return the most basic principles of the right to the truth, life and the ownership of property.

Edward, the question you raise about individual responsibility versus state responsibility is an interesting one that can lead to a lengthy academic discussion. Possibly, you have some ideas to put forth. In that case, I think, many readers of FPJ will be glad if you state your views. It is only after seeing what you say, will I be able to respond if I thought what I say is of some use.

Edward

Nasir: Re: Your comment below on individual versus state responsibility. As I have said, maybe we we need to return to the basic and absolute indivdual right to the truth, life and the ownership of property. You will probably recognise these in their negative form “you shall not bear false witness against your neighbour”, you shall not kill” and you shall not steal”. Before you say that these rights cannot be absolute who has the authority to lie, to kill or to steal. No one. It follows then that anyone who denies any of these rights to others must be held accountable for their actions whether they act as an individual or as a servant of the state. Note that it was common practice to hold a coroner’s enquiry into every violent death even in wartime until the Americans came along and refused even to count he people they killed in Iraq. A good example of where state responsibility becomes individual responsibility is given in the account of Jesus before Pilate. Pilate was deemed to be responsible for his actions but the greater sin was apportioned to those who handed Jesus over to Pilate. This indicates that we cannot absolve ourselves from the actions of the government we elect. In summary then there are three basic and absolute rights which we are all individually responsible for whatever our station in life. These rights cannot under any circumstances be set aside with impunity.

Josh

Jon Benjamin, Board of Deputies chief executive, said: “The EDL’s supposed ‘support’ for Israel is empty and duplicitous. It is built on a foundation of Islamophobia and hatred which we reject entirely.

So…. there are some sick minded Jews who join the EDL and just a few days ago understood that the EDL are Nazis and even crazy “Roberta Moore” left after a year as she understood who they are. On the other side, you get Sick minded Jews, like “GILAD ATZMON” and hundred of other jews who hate Israel and will sell their soul to the devil for thier hate, will join all Israel and jew haters in order to gain their hate satisfaction.

BUT JEWS LIKE ATZMON, WILL NEVER GET TO THEIR SENSES AND CONTINUE THEIR SICK HATE FOR THE JEWS AND ISRAEL, AS THOSE PSYCHO’S DON’T HAVE ANY LIMIT AND ARE DOOMED.

Barry

For all the hypocrites………. Who is Israel ENEMY………. Islam, not the Palestinians, they never been the enemy’s as they were a tool for the Arab Muslim Countries, that wanted the Jews pushed to the SEA.

So give me a break, Muslim’s around the world, see the Jew’s as Israel partners and as so see the Jew’s as their Enemy’s So stop playing stupid, show me Muslim’s who are not against Jews…….. (maybe you can count them). More Jews are less anti Muslims then vise versa, even in Israel the peace movement is much bigger then on the other side. So stop playing this Hypocrite stupid game. Right Wing knows it, as you do and are trying to benefit. From there to assume your stupid assumption, to blame Israel and the jews, is the Muslim hate for the jews propaganda and nothing more.;

robert

On the same level see the admiration letter sent today from the Grand Wizard KKK David Duke to Gilad Atzmon an avid anti Jew.

“As you have pointed out so well with the Jewish corruption of the so-called Anti-Zionist Movement, please understand that for these radical Jews, destruction of European heritage and loyalty is a weapon they use to divide and conquer. Multiculturalism is a weapon for Jewish supremacism. Immigration is means to divide and conquer ,and they are already using its bad effects to garner support for Israel from unsuspecting European people. It is my task to warn the world of this Trojan Horse before there are many more Breiviks and the immense damage and evil they cause our people.

Best to You, David Duke”

Those Two Racist anti Jewish, can form the new Anti Jewish Movement.

kass

So Robert, I too can send you a letter addressing you as the illegitimate son of Hitler. Does that make you one?

The zios are one with all the right-wingers across the world. Now why else are there so many Israeli flags waving at their demostrations? And it isn’t only the EDL members waving them. Take a look at the ChristianZio wingnuts like Haggee and Huckabee. What do you see waving behind them? Why it’s the izzy flag!

Now, what did Breivik say in his Manifesto: “So let us fight together with our Zionist brothers against all anti-Zionista, against all cultural Marxists/multiculturalists? Et tu Robert, Barry, Josh?

Barry

Kass

Well If you sent a letter to me, then…. what the hell. But if the GRAND WIZARD OF THE KKK David Duke sends you a letter. Well if you don’t see the Difference. I am not surprized by your comment.

robert

I think Kass dose not know who David Duke is…….. I guess he thinks is just another commenter.

Miriam

Neither the islamic hate crimes that has gone on for well over 1000 years during ottoman and mogul colonial savagery nor the current ruling elite have had any viable or practical solution to riots, rapes and robbery we witness in countries like India, Thailand, Nigeria, Philippines, Sudan, etc where infidels are either being killed or paying infidel-tax or being converted exactly as prescribed in kuran. India is affected by frequent and pervasive blasts in trains, markets, and temples besides riots for Saddam’s hanging, Rev Falwell’s remarks, danish cartoons – all events totally unrelated to Indians. Why???

We keep filling the pockets of islamists in the name of aid to fakistan, bangladesh, somalia, egypt, etc over and above what citizens of directly affected countries listed in prior para – pay as infidel tax. Where is the end?! What is the solution??! Thanks and Regards,

Zionist propagandists are past masters in the art of deception, manipulation of world public opinion, calucated misleading digressions of the goals they purue but they never explain what they stand for. But we understand why they don’t say what they stand for and what their plans are. At least, unlike some people, I am under no illusions. I know what Zionists are doing and whszt is their strategy to achieve their goals.

The Zionist curse in the Middle East and on the rest of the world is more dangerous than the Nazi curse. The Nazi racist ideology and political agenda led to the some of the great crimes against humanity in the last century.

Who could have ever imagined that Zionists will be the virtual inheritors of Nazism backed by the United States of America? But in reality that is what has happened and they have succeeded in where the Nazis failed. That is a historical and political fact that keeps on unravelling before all of us. Some see it, many don’t.

Even the greatest military and political power in the history of the world, the United States of America, is subject to the diktat and power of the Zionists. What that means for the world is something that sane people should start to think and tell us what to do.

Mark Mywords

This guy is somehow connected to israel as no human would do what he did!!! It will all come out, all the crimes of the zionist and humanity will rise up and rid the planet to restore peace!!!!

who+dares+wings

Norway was in the gunsights of Israel for a number of reasons. Three significant ones are 1. It’s billion dollar oil fund divestments in Israeli companies. 2. The announcement that is will cast a UN vote for Palestinian statehood. 3. The termination of it’s alliance with NATO in the Libya adventure. I don’t think anything about Anders Breivik from the studio photos of him in costume to the convenient Facebook page(s) to the slickly produced video and manifesto are the work of a lone singleminded anti-jihadist. Michael Leeden, a behind-the-scenes American neo-conservative Zionist pundit with a checkered career as a psyops “soldier” in Italy is supposed to have once said, “take a small country and slap it against the wall, just to show we mean business.” Even if the quote isn’t true it reflects the Zionist mindset and Zionism was happy with Norway on August 22.

vince fiorito

The Oslo killer was a violent neoconservative extremist. I’d use the phrase neoconservative fundamentalist, but that would imply all neoconservatives are fundamentally violent killers and that would be just as wrong as the term Muslim Fundamentalist to describe violent Muslim extremists.

Ben T, I am pleased to see your article in Dagbladet. I also live in Oslo, and I am glad that some Norwegian journalists, from time to time, can write a good article as yours in such a case. That gives us some hope, no doubt.

However, I am also aware that in a small country like Norway, where the ‘native’ people are mostly humane and caring, we have serious societal problems. But with a humane attitude we can confront what are immigration problems from eastern Europe and the rest of the world. Such matters can’t be dealt with by us as individuals (as some suggest, Mr. Breivik is one extreme of that outlook, but only the government can form policies in this regard. We have a democratic political system in Norway, which in my view, can be a model for the rest of the world. And I mean that literally as far Norway’s internal matters (not the foreign policy!) are concerned. That is my sincere view about Norway and its humane and egalitarian system.