A More Diversified Anchor Strategy

Over the past few months, the performance of the Leveraged Anchor strategy has exceeded our expectations. There has also been a few things learned regarding adjustments after large market falls, that had never been contemplated (see Anchor Analysis And Options).

The model portfolio also expended a bit of cash to reset the long call position, so the strategy could participate more if and when the market continues to rebound.

Even with this good performance, we are always looking to improve overall performance.Improved performance can occur through a reduction in risk, better absolute performance over time, or a combination of the two.

I’ve created three different portfolios for demonstrative purposes.Portfolio 1 is 100% long SPY.Portfolio 2 is 25% each of SPY, IWM (small caps), QQQ (technology), and EFA (international).Portfolio 3 roughly curve fit the best blend of them (thanks to portfolio visualizer):

As can be seen, virtually any blend of diversified assets has outperformed simply holding one asset class over the last 20 years. If we curve fit, we can greatly increase performance – by almost 2% per year.Historically, going further back in time, this pattern holds even more true.A diversified blend of assets typically reduces risk and increases performance, over significant periods of time.

Of course, you’ll be able to find a 1-5 year period (or maybe even longer), where a single asset class outperforms a diversified basket – but good luck picking that asset class moving forward.Is it time for international stocks to rebound more than the U.S. despite lagging for a decade?Are small caps going to outperform large caps as they traditionally do?What about technology – will it continue to outperform other large caps?Maybe you have those answers, but I don’t.However, as a long term investor, I know that diversification works over time.

How does one decide what the “optimal” split is in allocation?If you look over the last 20 years, SPY has a CAGR of 5.58%, IWM 6.03%, QQQ 7.08%, and EFA 4.31%.What if we take out the recent bull run in large caps and look at the first decade of this century (2001-2010)?Things change drastically.SPY has a CARG of 3.00%, IWM 6.83%, QQQ 4.24%, and EFA 6.69%.If you expand further, you can find (thanks to Forbes):

(Note: Technology was not an asset class for much of the above period).

After reviewing multiple periods of time (from one year to one hundred years), several trends are clear:

Small caps typically outperform large caps;

Over the last 10 years, large caps have been the best performing;

Technology stocks have outperformed even large caps significantly in the last decade;

International stocks have consistently under performed large cap, small cap, and technology, but that trend is “recent” in the last 20 years; but

International has the lowest correlation to the listed classes.

There is no “magic” blend and each investor can create their own.Some people will be most comfortable with a straight 25/25/25/25 split, which takes any risk for picking which sector is going to perform the best off the table.Others will weigh the most recent better performers stronger.If we look at just the last 10 or 20 years, we would not allocate anything to international stocks.However, I personally like the low level of correlation and want at least some exposure internationally.I also expect a reversion to small caps outperforming, particularly in the near future.In my personal portfolio, I would choose:

SPY25%

QQQ25%

IWM30%

EFA20%

There is no “correct” blend, as it is impossible to know which class will perform the best moving forward, particularly over long periods of time.Part of the above also contemplates some of the overlap between QQQ and SPY.

Once an asset class division is decided on, all that is left to do is to implement the Leveraged Anchor strategy on each asset.This is the biggest challenge in setting things up, as it is capital intensive.Assuming 3 contracts is the smallest size one can use (3 long calls, 3 long puts 5% out of the money, 1 long put at the money, and one short put), then current minimum amounts necessary to open a Leveraged Anchor strategy:

SPY:$35,000

QQQ:$30,000

IWM:$20,000

EFA:$7,500

These values are going to somewhat dictate how you divide your money among the different asset classes.For instance, it is virtually impossible, without very large sums of money, to get the splits I set out above.I could get close:

SPY:$35,00025.6%

QQQ:$40,00029.2%

IWM:$46,66734.14%

EFA:$15,00010.9%

But to implement the above, I would need almost $140,000.The minimum I would need to implement any version of a diversified Anchor is still over $90,000.

I would advise any client that is interested in Anchor, and who has over $100,000 to invest, that diversifying the strategy, should outperform, over long periods of time.In any given one- or two-year period, there will be outperformance by one class over the other.The goal of diversification is to reduce variability and risk, while increasing returns, over long periods.

In the near future, we will begin listing out Leveraged Anchor trades for the different asset classes.Members are free to stick with SPY or come up with their own diversification blend.As always, if you would like to open a managed account, and have Lorintine Capital manage a diversified Anchor portfolio for you, we would be happy to discuss the matter.

Christopher Welsh is a licensed investment advisor and president ofLorintineCapital, LP. He provides investment advice to clients all over the United States and around the world. Christopher has been in financial services since 2008 and is aCERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™. Working with a CFP® professional represents the highest standard of financial planning advice. Christopher has a J.D. from the SMU Dedman School ofLaw,a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, and a Bachelor of Science in Economics. Christopher is a regular contributor to the Steady OptionsAnchor TradesandLorintine CapitalBlog.

Recent Articles

Articles

Diversifying your portfolio is important for all investors, and currency investments are a great way to do that. However, there are a lot of misconceptions and common mistakes that first time currency investors make, and this leads to big losses.

In my early option trading days, I favored selling iron condors over selling strangles. I thought that selling a strangle was too risky because the potential loss was “undefined”. I thought this made sense because this is what I’d hear from other people that were more experienced than I was.

The good news is that if trading is your passion, then it’s possible to become a successful day trader and work from home. However, it’s not as easy as setting up shop and jumping online. There are specific steps and processes you need to have in place if you’re going to be able to make a living for yourself and have a bright career and future.

These days, everyone claims to be an ‘expert’ on absolutely everything. Apparently, it only takes having a Twitter account to be a seasoned expert on any given subject; all in all, the Internet is full of nonsense. It’s becoming harder and harder to find legitimate answers amongst the quagmire of false information online.

Our first advice to new traders is: "Learn First, Trade Later". The markets will always be there, but if you start trading without proper fundamentals, your capital will be gone very fast. The barrier to enter trading is so low today, commissions are near zero, and the whole trading game looks very promising.

Dividend payments, like oatmeal, may be smooth or lumpy. Smooth dividends are predictable, usually once per quarter. It is easy for options traders to believe these dividends are guaranteed, because they usually continue uninterrupted quarter after quarter. This also makes it easy to predict total return over a longer time span.

On April 18th I wrote part I of this article, Coming to Peace With Market Volatility. I showed how the US equity market risk premium, defined as the annual average return of the Total Market minus the return of one-month US Treasury Bills, was a large 8.37% per year from 1950-2019. That’s the good news.

The ratio calendar spread is well-known to some, but for others the risk/reward aspects are not well understood. One way to cover a short position is to own 100 shares of the underlying stock. Another, more creative way is to sell a shorter-term expiration position and buy a longer-term position.

"Who you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes?" Our members and readers know that buying pre earnings straddles has been one of our favorite strategies that produced consistent gains in the last 8 years with very low risk. Yet there is a significant number of studies showing that this strategy has a negative expectation.

Using the most popular S&P 500 ETF (SPY) to represent the US stock market, this article will look at different ways to manage equity market risk using historical ETF and options data from ORATS Wheel since 2007. We will analyze the following unhedged, hedged and allocation choices:

Navigation

Follow Us

About Us: Our options advisory service offers high quality options education and actionable trade ideas. We implement mix of short and medium term options trading strategies based on Implied Volatility.

Disclaimer: We do not offer investment advice. We are not investment advisors. The information contained herein should not be construed as an investment advice and should not be considered as a solicitation to buy or sell securities