Tag: gentoo

I had some arguments the other day with Developers over at Gentoo (Funtoo has not responded yet) about how I recommend to go about in Gentoo with Ruby-1.8 and Ruby-1.9. Diego the lead head at Gentoo, responsible for Ruby documented it is very well in his blog.

This brings me to my own statement:

1. Ensure that Ruby1.8 and Ruby1.9 install nicely on Gentoo.
2. Ensure that gem18 and gem19 install nicely on Gentoo and make sure the Libraries of 18 and 19 do not overwrite eachother.

What is important is this: If gem18 and gem19 work and one can install the most basic packages, then the Power-Ruby-User can always install more by hand. That is exactly what I done. Out of some reason the

package did not want to install via Gem. I downloaded the source, built a gem and installed that. No problem whatsoever.

This is the reason why I believe you should not waste to much time on getting all the gem-Package Ready for gem1.9.

It is far more important that the main bricks for the “Ruby-House” are laid out correctly. As far as I understand the main bricks are ruby1.8 ruby1.9 and gem18 and gem19 and some gem packages that the Gentoo developers use themselves.

If above frameworks works, the others will automatically follow. All you need to do is state clearly what gems you (Gentoo-Developers) support and what gems you have to build yourself. The officially supported gems should contain tests, ok. But you really need to limit the officially supported gems!

Then you can start making money by helping people build their gems for their systems!

As I understand you guys (Gentoo Developer responsible for Ruby) are really doing the work for the developers – where actually the developers (inventors of the software) should do the work.

You are porting ruby-Software to work with Ruby-1.9 out of free will. This is honorable of you! But I think it is the slower path then going the other way: Making sure the important stuff works and doing the rest on demand of user requests.

If you buy a car, the basic model comes with the basic features (it always has an engine and windows and so on). If you want the fancy stuff you should pay for it.

There are lot of companies out there that are willing to pay for professional help for some gem package that does not work.

Like this:

Ok, because of this post I had to try a Intel SSD. So I bought this one here. I moved all my data over like this. It all worked well and now I am running on my new SSD. And there is a big difference. So a quote from here is totally true:

If you’re curious, it’s the random write performance that you’re most likely to notice and that’s where a good SSD can really shine; you write 4KB files far more often than you do 2MB files while using your machine.

Also Startup-Time of your computer is crazy fast! I can hardly see my Gentoo-Message while BootUp anymore. If your are on Linux, also consider these options for fstab and booutup: noatime, elevator=noop. But read more of your own in the above mentioned links.

Update: There is a newer, faster and cheaper version out now: X25-M G2

Share this:

Like this:

1. Ok, so I decided to try out EC2. The first thing – obviously – what you want to do is, build your own custom image. First Bummer: Amazon will not allow you to build and compile your own kernel! You will have to use an Amazon-Kernel found here. At the moment I am compiling Gentoo (amd64) according to this HowTo.

While my Gentoo compiles, some of the points I do not like about Amazons Communications:

What is the underlying hardware they are using?

What CPU’s do you get for your money, what is their speed? I tried to find out myself by doing “cat /proc/cpuinfo”

What kind of disks are the different instances running on? Are they SATA, SCSI, IDE, etc?

I really would love to see more transparency in above points by Amazon.

2. Somehow I also have the feeling that the “value for money” you get from Amazon EC2 for using their CPU’s is expensive (like buying a car vs leasing a car; leasing a car is always more expensive). The reason why I have this feeling is because I compared the prices for buying a server equivalent of the m1.xlarge instance. The price for such a server would roughly be USD 3000.-. Now traffic is cheap at EC2 but CPU’s are not. EC2 will give you comparingly “slow” CPU for your money if you compare to buying a new server. “cat /proc/cpuinfo” for the m1.xlarge instance shows me “Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 270” processor.

3. Doing a “emerge -e world” – on a “m1.large” instance – and at the same time untaring the linux-2.6.16.33-ec2.tgz makes the “untaring” take forever (more then 50 Minutes). Just for unpacking 53 MB. Is it possible that XEN still has some problems juggling the resources of an instance? I get the feeling that my instance only gets the CPU “to do one task at the same time”.

4. Ok, so now I started surfing the web about more detailed Feedback (also negative) on EC2 an I found the following to links:

and I must say that I am stopping my experiment right here. And yes, this is _totally_true_: “And I get a bit irritated when I come across sentences like Jinesh’s at RailsConf: “infinity auto-scalable on-demand computing resource”” – but just go an check it out for yourself! EC2 of Amazon is definitely still BETA.

Share this:

Like this:

I just installed the latest version of Qemu on my Gentoo machine and I am impressed how easy the installation was. I am really impressed. I did not have to configure any interface or stuff, I just installed Qemu Version 0.9.1 and also KQemu (1.3.0 pre11) put in the CD of my Windows XP copy and ran these commands: