I agree, but those of us who have been following the UFO trail for a long time are becoming cynical as a result of all the ... well what's the technical term here .... ummmm..... complete horseshit. Yeah, that's it.

A credit that any of us are still here hoping for an answer, and more specifically that this latest evolution of our 'best hope' turns out to be what it's advertising itself as. So we'll see.

Results of materials analysis and the future of TTSA are not specifically tied together. If they're extraterrestrial then they are totally linked to TTSA and joy to the world. If it's a puddle of crapola then TTSA will just soldier on. Maybe put the results away in their mylar balloon file.

I had a look at the Paracast site for the hell of it. Most recent guest is somebody I never heard of but this quote got my attention

"UFO documentary producers are interested in UFO's to the extent that they can make money on films. They are aware of the fact that UFO documentaries rate well and they want to produce something that will sell."

Yeah, just listening to the podcast he does seem like he could be a bit dick-ish. But I have to wonder if he is pointing out that the King got no clothes. He's going to do his thing with FOIA anyway so I say let him and see what he turns up. If all is above board there should be no issue and what he finds will simply be confirmation.

Up until now has anybody had a problem with him and what he's been doing?

We've known ever since this March 2018 interview with Sen. Harry Reid that the AAWSAP/AATIP was specifically created to study UFOs. So either A.) John hasn't been following the press regarding this story, B.) he's contesting Sen. Reid's public statements on the matter, or C.) he's deliberately misdirecting his audience. None of those options present a favorable view of his work on the matter.

TTS Academy has drafted proposed legislation for Congress to consider to ask for a report on making the Navy's UAP findings public.

Sec. xxx Report on Advanced Aerial Threats

A. REPORT REQUIRED. – Recent briefings provided to Congress by US military and intelligence personnel raise the possibility that one or more potential US adversaries may have achieved breakthroughs in aerospace engineering that could place US forces at risk. Unfortunately, there is no coherent process within the Executive Branch for collating or analyzing pertinent information on this topic notwithstanding the potential gravity of the issue. Moreover, requests for relevant data to enable Congress to better assess the significance of the issue have not been responded to in a satisfactory manner by DoD or the Intelligence Community. Therefore the Secretary of Defense and Director of National Intelligence shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the issue of Anomalous Airborne Threats.

B. ASSESSMENTS.- The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:

1. A detailed analysis of NORAD’s unknown threat database from January 2004 to the present and correlation of that data with information collected by space-based infrared systems, human intelligence reporting; SIGINT, US Navy intelligence reporting on unidentified craft (both aerospace and undersea) and FBI data derived from investigations of intrusions over restricted US airspace.

2. Identification of a process and a senior official who can be held accountable in the future for ensuring the timely collection and centralized analysis of all Anomalous Airborne Threat reporting regardless of which service or agency acquired the information.

3. Identification of any incidents or patterns that indicate a potential adversary may have achieved breakthrough aerospace capabilities that significantly surpass US capabilities and could put US strategic or conventional forces at risk.

C. RECOMMENDATIONS – The report under subsection (a) above shall include any recommendation for increased collection or research and development deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Defense and Director of National Intelligence.

D. SUBMITTAL DATE- The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than 18 months after enactment of this bill.

E. FORM- The report under subsection (a) may be submitted in either classified or unclassified form.

TTS Academy has drafted proposed legislation for Congress to consider to ask for a report on making the Navy's UAP findings public.

Sec. xxx Report on Advanced Aerial Threats

A. REPORT REQUIRED. – Recent briefings provided to Congress by US military and intelligence personnel raise the possibility that one or more potential US adversaries may have achieved breakthroughs in aerospace engineering that could place US forces at risk. Unfortunately, there is no coherent process within the Executive Branch for collating or analyzing pertinent information on this topic notwithstanding the potential gravity of the issue. Moreover, requests for relevant data to enable Congress to better assess the significance of the issue have not been responded to in a satisfactory manner by DoD or the Intelligence Community. Therefore the Secretary of Defense and Director of National Intelligence shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the issue of Anomalous Airborne Threats.

B. ASSESSMENTS.- The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:

1. A detailed analysis of NORAD’s unknown threat database from January 2004 to the present and correlation of that data with information collected by space-based infrared systems, human intelligence reporting; SIGINT, US Navy intelligence reporting on unidentified craft (both aerospace and undersea) and FBI data derived from investigations of intrusions over restricted US airspace.

2. Identification of a process and a senior official who can be held accountable in the future for ensuring the timely collection and centralized analysis of all Anomalous Airborne Threat reporting regardless of which service or agency acquired the information.

3. Identification of any incidents or patterns that indicate a potential adversary may have achieved breakthrough aerospace capabilities that significantly surpass US capabilities and could put US strategic or conventional forces at risk.

C. RECOMMENDATIONS – The report under subsection (a) above shall include any recommendation for increased collection or research and development deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Defense and Director of National Intelligence.

D. SUBMITTAL DATE- The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than 18 months after enactment of this bill.

E. FORM- The report under subsection (a) may be submitted in either classified or unclassified form.

.

Click to expand...

That is interesting. It certainly seems to confirm Luis Elizondo's long-standing assertion that his intention by going public with TTSA was to get the intel under the nose of the Secretary of Defense where it belongs, rather than sequestered away in covetous little silos and stovepipes where it remains hidden today.