<quoted text>Wow, this post got 7 poor judge-its?Goes to show the sheeple mentality found in this thread. You either can't, or don't bother to read.My guess, based on previous exchanges with some of the people in this thread, it is a comprehension problem.

<quoted text>Oh yes. I'll have many questions for you. Thanks for volunteering. Lets start off with a few.So tell us fruitloops. Why do you call another man "sugar nipples"?Why does supporting marriage equality mean my head is up my ass?Why is same sex marriage worthy of discussion but poly worthy of only insult?So, work on them and get back to me fruitloops. I have many more for you too. Thanks again.

Is buttercup better? Cool beans buttercup, if you want to discuss poly, start a thread, I am sure you will find many who would just love to post on it. You see Buttercup, this thread pertains to the quetion of same sex marriage and the legality of negating a right that was once given in Calif. Thanks for playing " You're a Dumbass", please pick up your door prize as you exit the building. OH by the way, Buttercup you don't really support marriage equality, you just feel the need to scream "Look at me"

<quoted text>Say, aren't you the moron who used to call himself "ACLU-Tom" ? "Asshat" is a dead giveaway...

Yeah that "sugar nipples" gay slang sounds familiar too.

There was some dope went by "Jbird56" or Jackass bird58" something like that used to post dumb stuff same as this "jazzybird" clown here a while ago. But could be Tom too, you might be right. He was a loud mouth jackass too.

<quoted text>Oh, I almost forgot, could you please tell wat the tyler to stop talking about f*cking the jesus ferak, as it is off-topic ?

I will do that right after jesus freaks stop trying to pass off the bible as law. Unless of course you are confused and some how think that our laws are based on the bible. In that case never mind I cant fix stupid

Nevertheless, there is plenty of evidence that homosexuality is not innate. There is a very considerablebody of testimony from tens of thousands of men and women who once lived as homosexuals. These ex-“gays” have renounced their former lifestyles and many have become heterosexual in self-identification anddesire, while others have stopped at the point of comfort with their own gender and freedom from same-sexdesires. The “gay” movement’s challenge to former homosexuals to, in essence, prove they aren’t stillinnately “gay” is the height of absurdity since homosexual immutability was never proven in the first place.Why is the question of immutability so important? Because if homosexuality is not innate, it must beacquired. And if it can be acquired, we dare not allow homosexuality to be legitimized to our children. Ifthere remains any shadow of doubt as to the cause of homosexuality, we must err on the side of protectingour children. Indeed we must actively discourage them from viewing homosexuality as safe and normal,when in fact it is demonstrably neither safe nor normal. It bears noting here that normalcy is functioningaccording to nature or design. Normalcy is not based on popular opinion.In summary, the true definition of homosexuality is same-gender sexual conduct. A homosexual is a personwho defines himself or herself by the participation in or desire to participate in such conduct. This definitionis both logical and intuitively sound.For the sake of our children and the health of our society, we must not accept the redefinition of theseterms. We must force the advocates of the “born that way” argument to admit that they can’t prove it, andthat since they can’t prove it, they must admit the possibility that homosexuality may be acquired. We mustnever allow a discussion to proceed forward if the immutability of homosexuality is assumed as a premise.We must challenge the premise and force the logical concessions, without allowing the subject to bechanged.From: http://www.defendthefamily.com/_docs/resource...

<quoted text>Is buttercup better? Cool beans buttercup, if you want to discuss poly, start a thread, I am sure you will find many who would just love to post on it. You see Buttercup, this thread pertains to the quetion of same sex marriage and the legality of negating a right that was once given in Calif. Thanks for playing " You're a Dumbass", please pick up your door prize as you exit the building. OH by the way, Buttercup you don't really support marriage equality, you just feel the need to scream "Look at me"

Don't have one cowboy must be yours. If I liked that sort of thing, she wouldn't leak.

Blow up dolls? You complained that this thread is about the judge. You even scolded me for talking about marriage, but not the form of marriage suitable to you. Now we're talking about your leaky inflatable love doll?

When they scream poly is off topic it really means they hate it and wish to keep it illegal, but of course they can't say that without exposing themselves as the hypocrites that they are. Makes 'em real mad. Fun!

The DiDuchie/Studly online bromance continues You two boys really need to stop acting like adolenct delusionalpreteen girls, you know the cluless little twits who think the entire world is hanging on their every word. Time for you fellas to get a room, or at least start PMing each other.

<quoted text>You're on drugs. Jan Brewer is one of the last patriots this country has. She is doing more to protect this nation than Obammy is. Are you in favor of letting illegal immigrants into our country ?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.