Maybe I'm crazy, but couldn't the rating system just work exactly the way the CC points system works. Use the same formula? Maybe it's been suggested before, but why couldn't that be another system that could then be combined with things like F400 and others to be averaged and create a BCS type ranking?

kuma32478 wrote:Maybe I'm crazy, but couldn't the rating system just work exactly the way the CC points system works. Use the same formula? Maybe it's been suggested before, but why couldn't that be another system that could then be combined with things like F400 and others to be averaged and create a BCS type ranking?

Chariot of Fire wrote:Can we make the submitted rankings from each rep public (i.e. post them in a thread)? This way there is less chance of bias. It also makes the whole exercise more interesting for spectators.

Chariot of Fire wrote:Can we make the submitted rankings from each rep public (i.e. post them in a thread)? This way there is less chance of bias. It also makes the whole exercise more interesting for spectators.

THIS +1000!

- 1000

lol if you did this when he goes 2 do it a 2nd time clans will rate other clans bad because they rated them bad. but would be a fun thread to read every one bitching about that clan ranked other clans and visa versa....

Chariot of Fire wrote:Can we make the submitted rankings from each rep public (i.e. post them in a thread)? This way there is less chance of bias. It also makes the whole exercise more interesting for spectators.

In a perfect world I would have no problem doing this, but I think it would cause more harm than good. At the end of the day, I have the final say if someone can vote or not. If I get a ballot, and its ridiculous, that voters gonna get the boot. Sorry man

i thought this about my world and then i saw you in it... i was depressed for a month

haha, the genius of freakns. love it!

And I agree...nothing like a bit of controversy. Then again there shouldn't be any controversy if it's all in the open. People can give reasons for why they have ranked a clan where they have. It would be a lively debate.

Why? I think most people can be fairly intellectually honest and rate themselves fairly. BG is already taking out top and bottom results so if someone rates themselves way out of line, it'll be neutralized anyway. Plus he has said he will make sure each submission is reasonable etc.

So a 18th rank clan saying they were 10th might get dropped and if they said 1st hed probably say unreasonable.

These situations basically take care of themselves if you can't be self reflective and honest about it.

IcePack

the Fallen, an unstoppable wave of Darkness! Armies will lay down their weapons to be taken into our numbers or die and lose their souls. What will you decide?