We use cookies to ensure we give you the best experience on our website. You can find out about our cookies and how to disable cookies in our Privacy Policy. If you continue to use this website without disabling cookies, we will assume you are happy to receive them. Close.

Opposition to new homes fell substantially between 2010 and 2013, with 46 per cent of respondents saying they would oppose new homes being built in their local area in 2010, compared to 31 per cent in 2013. The proportion that was supportive increased from 28 per cent in 2010 to 47 per cent in 2013.

Net opposition (percentage of those saying they are opposed minus those saying they are supportive) has reduced from 18 per cent in 2010 to -16 per cent. The strength of opposition for new homes has also decreased. The proportion of respondents stating they would strongly oppose new homes being built in their local area almost halved from 15 per cent in 2010 to 8 per cent in 2013. At the same time the proportion of respondents who said they would strongly support new homes more than doubled from 5 per cent to 11per cent.

Opposition fell across all age, tenure and income subgroups and among respondents living in different types of areas. However, home owners, those living in small cities and towns and in rural areas were still more likely to be opposed than renters and those living in large cities.

When respondents who were not supportive of new homes were asked which of the potential benefits from new housing would make them more supportive, they most commonly selected more employment opportunities (17 per cent), more low cost homeownership (11 per cent) and more or improved medical facilities (11 per cent).

When all respondents were asked if they would be more supportive of new homes if the “government provided local councils with more money to spend on local services for every new home built”, almost half (47 per cent) said this would make them more supportive.

A majority of respondents thought that a more localist planning system would make them more supportive of new homes. Sixty-three per cent of respondents said they would be more supportive if “local people were given greater control and say over what gets built in their local area”.

When asked “if the government brought in changes so that when people from a local community come together to get involved in planning for new development, that community can receive extra money to be spent locally”, 57 per cent said this would make them more supportive.

Thirty-eight per cent of respondents agreed whether they support new homes being built in their local area “depended on their design”. Forty-eight per cent agreed that “properties built in the last decade were better or much better designed, in terms of their external appearance, compared to those built around 20 or 30 years ago”. Twenty-seven per cent thought design was worse or much worse.

Eighty-two per cent of respondents agreed “there is a shortage of homes that are affordable to buy in England”, with 73 per cent agreeing there is a shortage “in my local area”. Eighty-three per cent felt it was more difficult (49 per cent) or much more difficult (33 per cent) to buy their own home today compared to 20 years ago.

Views were mixed whether building more homes would improve affordability. Forty per cent agreed with the statement “building more homes would improve the affordability of housing in my local area” while 55 per cent agreed that homes “would continue to be unaffordable in my local area even if new homes are built.”