Pascal's software conjecture: if software exists, then by expressing belief in it, one can reap the benefits of belief. If software does not exist, then since belief is cheap, it doesn't hurt you to believe in it. Therefore, it's the best policy to believe in software whether it exists or not.

Ah, but that would disqualify you from applying for this 'job'. Although it also implies that anyone who is hired for the position is fundamentally flawed.

I don't believe agnostic means that the belief is that it doesn't exist -- with agnostic it is still possible to prove or disprove. There is no "faith", nor any "scientific barriers" to hold the belief, one way or another.

[Henry]: I don't believe agnostic means that the belief is that it doesn't exist -- with agnostic it is still possible to prove or disprove. There is no "faith", nor any "scientific barriers" to hold the belief, one way or another.

I think that depends on the variety of agnosticism. Strong agnostics generally assert that it is not even possible to prove something one way or another. Weak agnostics generally believe that proof may be possible, but it hasn't happened yet.

If it doesn't exist, or you don't believe in its existence, then it must be vaporware. You can go to a place called Zen to see it. There's lots of it there. It all makes perfect sense in Zen. There's a lot of people there from a place called Marketing that regularly visit.