·For what years, frequency and geographic
coverage area, and level of aggregation is it available for each of the above
formats?

·Who collects it?

·Where can someone go to get these data, either
via internet, phone, or mail?

·How do you obtain it, and has this process proven difficult for you in
any way?

·If any special status (e.g., university researchers only) or process is
needed to get the data, what is it?

·Any costs associated?

·What kind of time lag is there between
collection and reporting/availability?

·What is the most current year available right
now?

·If it’s processed at the state level, is there
a way to get it at the local or regional level sooner?

·What are major strengths/weaknesses associated
with the dataset? (This could involve collection methodologies such as sample
size or frequency of collection, certain populations being represented/excluded,
accuracy of data entry, etc.)

·What improvements would you like to see take
place in collection of this type of data? (Ask them to prioritize 2 or 3.)

·Are there any other datasets for the same outcome (existing or in
development) that help to address some of these gaps?

·In a few sentences, what are the key reasons,
in your opinion, that this dataset is vital to individuals interested in
environmental public health in our region?

·Do you have any key statistics (i.e., using actual data) that we could
use to illustrate why this dataset is important from an environmental health
perspective?