Transgender MMA Fighter Destroys Female Opponent

No, its more of you failed to acknowledge any of the things I said, only attempted to refute them but failed miserably, and then you dismissed me,
basically taking the ball and going home. And lets be real, you act like I am not open to other facts, thats hilarious because you automatically
dismissed what I had linked and said, ohh want me to go find something to refute it? Remember that part? No?

I know you think you refuted my points, but I tell you, you did not, but whatever, right?

Agree all too much, there are some strong women in this beautiful blue pearl of ours....(or is it..) but neither would ever come close to the power a
man could conjure...maybe itll come to and end when some serious damage happens, and then what?

So this woman fighter, Evans-Smith beat Fox at least twice. Then says Fox should not be allowed to fight because she has an advantage.

What's particularly galling is Evans-Smith's objections to Fallon Fox. Evans-Smith beat Fox in the championship match of a tournament in 2013
after Fox came out publicly. Following the match - again, which Evans-Smith won - the woman who won the championship had this complaint: "I don't
feel like Fallon should fight dudes," she said. "I don't feel like she should fight women. I feel like there should be a unique organization for those
needs. She did have an advantage. She definitely did."

So according to Evans-Smith, Fox should be banned from mixed martial arts because of a perceived unfair advantage (despite being licensed by the
Florida State Boxing Commission), yet Evans-Smith went out and took banned substances to gain...an unfair advantage.

It's another example of the hypocrisy in sports, where some of the people putting out the most misinformation about the "advantages" of trans athletes
are the very people actually breaking the rules to get unfair advantages themselves.
www.outsports.com...

? I've not disrespected you, I've only argued a difference in skeletal structure.

Kinda hard to read that, I mean from what I could read it says M to F, estrogen prevented bone loss after testosterone deprivation, but in F to M that
bone loss still occurred but they think they should up it?

Do you have anything more recent, I mean I'll read this one if you got the whole thing, but it's 1997, have they upped the dosages?

I would think it would some what be in favor of Fox having an advantage since Fox is M to F? But this really doesn't compare a transwomans bone
density to someone born a female does it? I can only view a small square of it.

I still believe Fox had an advantage to being a male most of their life, going through puberty and whatnot.

As a father, I don't want a TG dude in the stall next to my daughter, especially when she was say.. 12.

How about this 14 year old m/f transgender girl?

Or this 6 year old m/f transgender girl?

Children? That's your go to? A 6 year old has no business being forced to change before knowing full well the implications, oh the Irony.

smh

Im sorry but do you know The mind of those people in the pictures and their circumstances? no you do not. And the point shes making is most TG you
woudnt even know. Now a Bearded guy in a pink frilly dress "claiming" with no doctors backing his claim up would be a issue though. Even I give pause
to that one.

And I think there's a lot of hype and sensationalism because it was a transgender female.

So, I researched women's fighting and found extreme injuries happen with natural born women.

No offense, but it seems apparent that you are oblivious (from the above statement) to what the main subject in the thread is about. The topic isn't
that bad injuries only happen in male MMA (or sports), but that the transgender has an advantage over a women.

Maybe I misread what you were trying to say, but that was my impression.

My first reaction on reading the op was that of course a tg female shouldn't fight a born female.
I remember the sex tests in the Olympics because the East Germans were changing men to get them in the shot put and stuff.

After reading a bit more, from those who know a lot more, it strikes me that those who go through all the hormones and stuff probably don't have an
unfair advantage.

So let them fight if they want.

And thanks to those of you who educated me a bit by posting what you did.

And I think there's a lot of hype and sensationalism because it was a transgender female.

So, I researched women's fighting and found extreme injuries happen with natural born women.

No offense, but it seems apparent that you are oblivious (from the above statement) to what the main subject in the thread is about. The topic isn't
that bad injuries only happen in male MMA (or sports), but that the transgender has an advantage over a women.

Maybe I misread what you were trying to say, but that was my impression.

originally posted by: SprocketUK
My first reaction on reading the op was that of course a tg female shouldn't fight a born female.
I remember the sex tests in the Olympics because the East Germans were changing men to get them in the shot put and stuff.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.