“It doesn’t help us to just blow off this stuff and dismiss it,” Levin said.

Levin noted that there were several “odd” things about the New York Times account of McGahn’s testimony, including the fact that McGahn reportedly continued to act as counsel to the president while aiding special counsel Robert Mueller.

Listen:

Levin also pointed out that it’s strange that McGahn reportedly feared he would be made a fall guy if Mueller pursues obstruction of justice accusations against Trump. There was no obstruction of justice — the Russian interference investigation continued unimpeded even after FBI Director James Comey was fired.

“The president is perfectly free to fire whomever he wishes who falls under his tutelage — yes, including the FBI director,” Levin said. He also noted that this New York Times report changes nothing with regard to the constitutional issues surrounding the Mueller probe or the phony Russian collusion narrative.

The “big picture,” Levin said, is that the entire Russian collusion narrative is all a “fabrication.”

“You should be furious that this president, [from] the day he stepped into the Oval Office, has been under investigation in one form or another,” Levin said. “He’s been under attack in one form or another.”

Author: Chris Pandolfo

Chris Pandolfo is a staff writer and type-shouter for Conservative Review. He holds a B.A. in politics and economics from Hillsdale College. His interests are conservative political philosophy, the American founding, and progressive rock. Follow him on Twitter for doom-saying and great album recommendations @ChrisCPandolfo.