SECOND DISTRICT COURT (2DCA), DIVISION ONE…The data/evidence presented will provide irrefutable proof the Second District Court, Division One has tenaciously fought against progressive movements intended to provide greater balance in our courts...in essence 2DCA, Division One has declared war on the Self Represent/The Poor/The Indigent, The Mass Majority.

The 2nd District Court of Appeal, Division One or Terror Organization?..."Lawyers run the country, we make the laws and when we do we make them, we make them advantageous to the lawyers".- 60 Minutes January 31, 2016**During the episode ONLY "1"of 16 of the prominent Lawyers interviewed acted with integrity, the quote above is from one of the other fifteen who were easily corrupted.​#1 Presiding Justice/*Lawyer Judge Frances Rothschild#2 Associate Justice/*Lawyer Judge Victoria Gerrard Chaney#3 Associate Justice/*Lawyer Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson - A follower, not a leader#1A Justice/*Lawyer Judge Elwood Lui - Former counsel for the County of Los Angeles was promoted and now a justice in the Second Appellate District (the insider telling the judges what legal arguments would support the county's position). Sweetheart deal for sure. Judge Lui was former Second Appellate District Justice, then went to Jones Day, worked on all Sturgeon Cases (Google: "Judicial Watch Sturgeon" & "Richard Fine Judicial Integrity"), then just before briefs were due in Sturgeon III--He is back in the Second District, Division One....In time to hear Appellants last appeal (no wonder the court did not address the tax fraud issue, or 68206.6)!! Not only is Judge Lui protecting himself, his son Christopher is an LA judge. The son is surely receiving the unconstitutional benefits...Collusion may run in the family? You see dad feverishly fought for his son to retain the unlawful benefits ("allegedly")against the publics interest in the Sturgeon Cases. Any admission of wrong-doing would also damage the other son in Washington DC. LUI's appt. should cause the entire appellate court second and fourth to recuse themselves (for the second and final time!) and since he was on the judicial council, he implicates the entire appellate branch!! If Appellant were to file a Notice In Lui of Subponea to gain access to Justice Lui's records - you can bet Justice Lui is now receiving the Unlawful County Benefits too - The LA Judicial O'l Boys Club is not without its perks.

​*Highlighting the Lawyer in those above, because they do not represent the Honorable Justices who do preside on the bench - By end of April a separate site will launch which will shock you and provide irrefutable evidence outlining the corruption in 2DCA Division 1 (I will also name which justices commit tax fraud) - You will soon understand why "Family" Law is in the wrong hands...they will set Family Law back 10+ years if we let them.

The Los Angeles Judicial Terror Organization (spearheaded by Division One) is certainly the most corrupt and the "black eye" of dishonor for the entire judicial; however, Family Law corruption is not only an LA concern, there is a national epidemic - Please view the movie Divorce Corp to better understand the broader issues - http://www.divorcecorp.com/

To the determent of the Self Represented (Pro Per), the millions California spent on the Elkins Task Force was unfortunately a colossal failure - Click Here Why?...there was no enforcement measures implemented which allowed progressive courts to opt-in; while regressive courts - 2DCA Division One - opted-out on the Pro Per; To evolve the courts to become fair and balanced, the "leveling of the playing field" must come to fruition for the masses - in approx. 75% cases a party is self represented.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s (USSC) ruling in the Elkins Case (see below) set a precedence for all California’s judges to “level the playing field” for self-represented litigants; therefore, the USSC empoweredand expectsthe Division One Justices to ensure a "level playing field" - instead they have chosen to suppress the rights of the Self Represented and rule in direct defiance to the USSC and the Elkins Task Force - Full discloser will be provide by end of April. To ensure the significant progress which the Elkins case achieved is not lost, OurFamilyLaw will carry the torch forward so opting-out on the Self Represented is no longer an option.

SEE: Elkins v. Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1337The U.S. Supreme Court found the treatment of Mr. Elkins, and likely other self-represented litigants could potentially create a lack of trust in the legal system…As a result, the Elkins Task Force was formed to ensure self-represented litigants received justice, fairness, and due process in family law – the term “leveling of the playing field” is frequently used to refer to the balance the Supreme Court expected the Elkins Task Force to achieve. SEE: ALAN JR v. SUPERIOR COURT (2009), A progressive court did exactly what the U.S. Supreme Court intended and the court issued a landmark ruling which was supposed to balance litigation in cases like the Appellants. In the Alan case, a precedence was set for the lower courts to consider the debt position of a party, so all factors are considered in balancing litigation.