On 02.03 H. Peter Anvin wrote:> Christoph Rohland wrote:> > > > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com> writes:> > > > > > Mmmmmm, does this mean that mounting /dev/shm is no more needed ?> > > > One step more towards easy 2.2 <-> 2.4 switching...> > > > Yes, it is no longer needed. You will need for POSIX shm, but there> > are not a lot of program out there using it.> > > > Do you need it for POSIX shm or not... if so, I would say you do need it> (even if it's going to take some time until POSIX shm becomes widely> used.)>

There was a post recently (that now I can't find), that said the shmmanagement was done with an interal fs. Was that Posix or sysv shm ?

-- J.A. Magallon $> cd pubmailto:jamagallon@able.es $> more beer

Linux werewolf 2.4.1-ac2 #1 SMP Sat Feb 3 10:45:59 CET 2001 i686

-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" inthe body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.orgPlease read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/