The problem, though, is the video doesn’t actually provide the crucial information, what would it take to achieve blubber rupture pressure (dubbed BLURP by one inquirer) thus invoking spontaneous cetacean detonation.

@JPL: My first reaction was “Dog Bites Man.” My second is to wonder why the SciAm editor didn’t go off the reservation once the camera started rolling. My third was, at least it makes part of a news cycle just to have the guy diss Fox and Friends.

But what I’d really like to see is other major media making fun of those craptastic folks at Fox. Pointing and laughing is more effective than earnest rebuttal, I think.

There is a video on youtube (at work can’t look for it) of some community trying to blow up a whale to clear a beach. It ends almost as badly as you can imagine.

US Forrest Service uses explosive to ‘remove’ large animals that have died in parks. They have a manual that shows how to place the minimum explosive to reduce the carcass to small enough pieces that the tourists don’t freak. But I gu

@Anoniminous: Sea level rise, appearance of unexpected coasts for cetaceans to throw themselves upon in massive GPS failures, you needing a method of propulsion for quick get-away from bad guys. MacGyver didn’t ask these kind of questions.

” They have a manual that shows how to place the minimum explosive to reduce the carcass to small enough pieces that the tourists don’t freak. ”

I wanna see that manual. Might come in handy.

In Alaska, I’ve heard stories about how people handle roadkill and other carcasses that they want to recover for some reason, sometimes to grind into dogfood or chip up to use for fertilizer. Heard of people using stove lighters to see if they can ignite the gases that are going to come out when they lance the carcass. Heard sometimes it works to reduce the stench, sometimes not.

“Kids are curious,” says Ms. Sheppard, the owner, along with her husband, Tom, of Sheppard’s B and B and a frequent visitor to the beach in recent days to take pictures of the dead whale. “The kids were wanting to go over and poke at it. They were wanting to go out and jump on the whale, and it is filling up with methane gas.

“I said to them, ‘My God, don’t you be doing that, because if that whale bursts you’ll be blown to smithereens.’ That’s what I said — and then they asked me if I knew their parents — which I didn’t. But I told them I did anyway.

Heeeere we go!

Jack Lawson is a research scientist with DFO’s marine mammals section. He has seen some dead whales in his day. His concerns about the dead whale beaching in Trout River is twofold.

“The [whale] skin is starting to lose its integrity and if someone were to walk along, say, the chin — that is full of all that gas — they could fall in the whale. The insides will be liquefied. Retrieving them would be very difficult.

“I have fallen through the side of a whale up to my chest. It’s not very nice. And if the animal is up against the shore and there are waves battering it, and it’s moving, then you can imagine what would happen if it rolled over onto a child.”

Joyce Carol Oates stupidly bitches about the death of the 1st amendment in the Donald Sterling case:

“Nostalgia for time when one could say anything in private no matter how stupid, cruel, self-serving or plain wrong & not be criminalized. Am I the only person in US surprised that a private conversation (no matter how ugly) can be the basis for such public recrimination?”

In the summer of 2013, according to multiple sources with knowledge of their exchange, Shepard Smith approached Fox News president Roger Ailes about publicly coming out. The newly attached anchor was eager, at the time, to finally acknowledge his sexuality. “It’s time,” he told Ailes and other colleagues. “It’s time.”

Old fart got knocked down by militia gladiators, former Marine says it wouldn’t have happened if he’d been there, and how they were all there at the beginning and all these militia folks are johny-come-latelies.

Several years ago a sperm whale washed up on the shores of Taiwan. Delighted at this find, local scientists persuaded the government to have it trucked to a nearby museum of natural history so the skeleton could be displayed. Alas, as the low boy tractor trailer hauling the whale was driving through the downtown section of an intervening city, the BLURP was spontaneously exceeded (probably due to a combination of increasing gas buildup and blubber degradation). Blew entrails all over cars, restaurants, passers by, et al. Classic photos.

Even further in the past, David Barry wrote and article about the video where the Oregon Department of Highway’s attempt to blow up a whale on the beach goes terribly awry. Worth reading in the original, but can you imagine filling a claim that your car was totaled due to being struck with whale innards descending from the heavens?

Referencing Bernoulli is always good. That reminds me of something from a time much longer ago than I care to admit. I was an intern doing internal medicine for one year. There was a patient who was not the most pleasant gentleman who had been admitted for chest pain. Everything about him screamed high risk for coronary artery disease. He left the hospital against medical advice but came back a day later with more chest pain. We convinced him to have heart catheterization done and he had significant coronary artery disease with atherosclerotic plaques causing over 90% narrowing of the left main coronary artery (a classic “widowmaker”) and another lesion with 98% narrowing in the left anterior descending coronary artery. Since I was the lowly intern I was sent to talk to him to explain why he should consider bypass surgery. I told him of these findings and he replied, “My goodness! That is serious! I am a plumber so I know that flow through a conduit is inversely related to the fourth power of the radius.” When I went back to the team I was asked how it went and I simply said that he understood fluid dynamics better than any of them did and that he was already agreeable to surgery.

Oh dear, am I, a private citizen, violating Joyce Carol Oates’ first amendment rights by not reading her tripe or paying any money for it? Or only if I say I think it’s totally wrong mistaken and uninformed, publicly?

Seems analogous to private citizen fans being pissed at privately owned team run by private organization, who express themselves publicly as private citizens over the team owner’s BS.

@Tom: That Oragon one is the one I saw the video of. All I could think of was this:
Ah … ! What’s happening? it thought.

Er, excuse me, who am I?

Hello?

Why am I here? What’s my purpose in life?

What do I mean by who am I?

Calm down, get a grip now … oh! this is an interesting sensation, what is it? It’s a sort of … yawning, tingling sensation in my … my … well I suppose I’d better start finding names for things if I want to make any headway in what for the sake of what I shall call an argument I shall call the world, so let’s call it my stomach.

Good. Ooooh, it’s getting quite strong. And hey, what’s about this whistling roaring sound going past what I’m suddenly going to call my head? Perhaps I can call that … wind! Is that a good name? It’ll do … perhaps I can find a better name for it later when I’ve found out what it’s for. It must be something very important because there certainly seems to be a hell of a lot of it. Hey! What’s this thing? This … let’s call it a tail – yeah, tail. Hey! I can can really thrash it about pretty good can’t I? Wow! Wow! That feels great! Doesn’t seem to achieve very much but I’ll probably find out what it’s for later on. Now – have I built up any coherent picture of things yet?

No.

Never mind, hey, this is really exciting, so much to find out about, so much to look forward to, I’m quite dizzy with anticipation …

Or is it the wind?

There really is a lot of that now isn’t it?

And wow! Hey! What’s this thing suddenly coming towards me very fast? Very very fast. So big and flat and round, it needs a big wide sounding name like … ow … ound … round … ground! That’s it! That’s a good name – ground!

The onion once again proves it is America’s premier news source:http://onion.com/1hTOpMLThe Arguments For And Against Capital Punishment
example –
FOR: Every now and then you get a guilty one
AGAINST: We don’t get to watch

@ruviana: Kay has posted in the comments a few times in the past week or so. She responded to my “we miss you and I was worried about you, glad to see you here” comment with an explanation that she has been very busy.

@Tom: Here’s the video from Oregon. I saw a version last year that had an interview with the guy whose car got smashed. His name was familiar and it turns out he is the uncle of a good buddy of mine. He said when he bought it the dealer’s motto was “we’ll give you a whale of a deal”!

“My goodness! That is serious! I am a plumber so I know that flow through a conduit is inversely related to the fourth power of the radius.”

Only in a laminar flow regime. If there’s turbulence, the flow is closer to proportional to the cross sectional area. Of course, I have no idea if flow in a coronary artery is laminar or turbulent, so I don’t know how important the distinction is in this case.

@Alce_y_ardilla:
I’m not sure about that. If you have a big enough pipe, the flow will tend to become turbulent regardless of the properties of the wall; I just don’t know whether that condition applies in something the size of a coronary artery. The other thing to consider is that blood is not just thicker (i.e. more viscous) than water, it is actually a non-Newtonian liquid, so you can’t use all your classical fluid dynamics equations to model it.