The MISRA-C team has to make a decision: should it move from
Referencing C95 (9899:1990+A1+RC1+TC2) to referencing C99 for the next
MISRA-C (version 3)

In the real world (especially embedded, safety-critical and
high-integrity circles) there are no C99 compilers in use as of
September 2007. They are C95+.

Any thoughts from anyone involved in writing compilers? Either to the
NG or to my email address. Yes, I have asked most of the main
embedded compiler companies I have contacts for (about 15 of them so
far) .

--
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
[MISRA C is a set of guidelines for writing C code for embedded
applications in motor vehicles. Needless to say, it is an environment
where bugs are bad. -John]