More women choose to abort twins, triplets

3D printed ovaries could help not only women who have undergone cancer treatment, but those who have experienced problems such as early menopause or genetic diseases. Picture: Freeimages

London - Growing numbers of women expecting twins, triplets, quads and quintuplets are aborting one or more of their unborn babies.

Official figures show that 85 women had a “selective reduction” - or chose to terminate the life of at least one child in the womb -Êwhile continuing with the pregnancy last year.

This compares with 59 women in 2006.

Around a third were carried out on women who had got pregnant as the result of fertility treatment.

The Department of Health said that around three-quarters of the procedures were performed on medical grounds.

Often, women are advised that aborting one of their babies will raise the odds of the remaining ones being born healthily.

But internet chat rooms include discussions among women who say they fear they cannot cope with having more than one baby at a time.

The Government figures, released under Freedom of Information laws, show that 101 foetuses were aborted as a result of selective reductions last year, as in some cases more than one was terminated.

Of the 85 women who underwent the procedure, 51 were expecting twins and had one of their babies terminated.

There were twenty abortions to “reduce” triplets to twins and nine to take a pregnancy from triplets to a single child.

Three women expecting quads aborted two foetuses and two mothers pregnant with five babies aborted three, leaving them with twins.

Separate figures from fertility watchdog the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority show that almost a third of selective reductions carried out in 2009 involved pregnancies that were the result of fertility treatment.

This could involve taking drugs that boost the release of eggs, before becoming pregnant naturally, or IVF, in which more than one embryo is placed in the woman’s womb, to maximised her chances of becoming pregnant.

Dr Peter Saunders, of the Christian Medical Fellowship, told the Daily Telegraph: “If prospective parents are not willing to have twins, then they should not be implanting more than one embryo at a time.

“Parental preference should not take precedence over the right to life of the unborn child.”

Concerns about the added risks of twin and other multiple births has led to the HFEA capping the number of embryos implanted at a time to one wherever possible.

A Department of Health spokesman said: “Multiple pregnancies are generally a greater risk to the mother and the babies.

“The risk is greater for twins than single babies but rises dramatically with three babies or more.” - Daily Mail