>>2871682Cool looking buildings but your vertical lines are off. And the triangular top looks especially crooked, like it's toppling over.In photoshop, there is an easy way to fix verticals called Adaptive Wide Angle Filter. Search on Youtube for tutorials if needed.Professional architectural photographers use a tilt shift lens to get perfect vertical lines, but it's too expensive for most of us. An easy workaround is to shoot much wider composition (cause you will lose some in post), and then use the Adaptive...Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2871439The might be some. Sometimes you don't know what could come good in BW because sometimes you can't see if some colours would blend together once in BW so this give you new chances of composition.It would also be more relaxing and give you more time to think on the composition rather then looking at the colours and maybe wondering what colours could ruin your shot

>>2871445bullshit. even my oly e500 which is 10 yrs old saves the color information in the raw picture but displays bw in the regarding mode. you cant even enforce that the color is not saved, because it is so stupid that developers wouldn't even enable an option for it.other thing is a bw sensor, which might have pros due to no need for debayering etc. but this also questionable.

Taking a family trip to Disney for 7 days next month. I want to roll light. I'm thinking about bringing my 5D3, 17-40mm L and 35mm 1.8 VC and nothing else. What would be your preference for an amusement park setup?

You want to go into the preferences menu, and under editing change the 'still image length'. Changing it to something like 0,2 in 29,970fps would get you 6 frames every second... Unfortunately this method only works for NEW images that you add to the timeline, not to adjust ones that are already on it. For that you'll need a plugin like Vegasaur which allows you to edit multiple events on the timeline at a time using 'Quick Properties'...

These aren't bespoke images created by a visionary photographer, they're run-of-the-mill jostens tier pablum cranked out by a walking tripod who earns maybe 12 bucks an hour and doesn't even own the images.

Alright, /p/. Let's see if we can go three-for-three. The last two Fridays here, we've actually had a pretty decent discussions about ::gasp:: photography. We looked at a modern portrait of Queen Elizabeth by Annie Leibovitz. And we looked at a 1970's suburban landscape by Stephen Shore. In both threads, we've had really great discussions about the photos themselves, about the photographers, and about comparable, complimentary, and contrasting works.

This week, let's take a look at a one of shots from Thomas Struth's "Pergamon Museum" series. A couple of weeks back, we used one of his photos as a comparison to the very different Leibovitz shot. So, this week, let's dig in to one of his photos.

What do you think of it? Do you love it? Do you hate it?

Most importantly, why do you love it? Why do you hate it? What technical elements do you enjoy? What technical elements do you hate? What are your thoughts on the content? What about the composition? What do you think of the lighting? What about the development/printing?

Now, maybe you hate Thomas Struth. Maybe you love him. That's not what this thread is about. If you want to discuss this photo compared to other work of his, that's certainly acceptable, but this is not a thread for generalized love/bashing. Let's actually discuss, you know, the photograph.

And, as always, ignore the trolls, and don't fall in to personality wars. Y'all did great the first week. Last week, there was a little bit of the /p/ bickering seeping into the thread, but by and large y'all were awesome. Let's keep it up.

And, as an aside: You may be wondering why I've picked any of these particular photos so far. Well, the criteria certainly isn't scientific or objective. My goal is to pick a photographer who is known on /p/, but who is not discussed ad nauseam. My goal is also to pick a photo and photographer who probably has both fans and critics here. Finally, my goal is to pick something that we probably haven't all analyzed to death. I don't want to pick something that everybody will automatically love or everybody will automatically hate. But, on the flip side, I don't...Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at imagescucc@gmail.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.