The department announced the expansion and an updated body camera policy Friday afternoon, saying officers will start wearing the cameras Saturday when working off-duty assignments. The department’s sergeants began using the cameras in June, said Cmdr. James Henning, who leads the investigative support division.

In all, more than 1,400 officers will wear the cameras.

The expansion is a response to a critique by the city’s police watchdog, who in 2015 said the department’s plan to roll out cameras should include off-duty officers, sergeants and the SWAT unit because those cops often are involved in use-of-force incidents. His recommendations also were supported by community groups who follow police issues and by several City Council members.

In a Friday news release, the department said its Metro/SWAT unit would begin using the cameras, which was one of the recommendations from independent monitor Nick Mitchell. However, those officers won’t activate the cameras when working a planned operation, according to the police department’s operations manual.

Denise Maes, public policy director for the ACLU of Colorado, questioned why Chief Robert White and his staff decided to include that exception for SWAT officers.

Kathryn Scott, The Denver Post

During a press conference at the Denver Police Department headquarters on Jan. 8, 2016, Det. John Medford wears a body camera.

“I’m a little puzzled, or perplexed, as to when they would be on,” Maes said. “That’s when you’re going to have the most questionable operations. I’m baffled by why that’s the exception.”

The Denver Police Department introduced body cameras after a pilot program in 2014 in District 6, which covers downtown. White declared the pilot a success and announced that all officers working patrol, traffic and with the gang unit would wear them.

The community supported the cameras as a way to hold officers accountable in their interactions with citizens, especially after controversial police shootings in Ferguson, Mo., and other cities across the country. Police and prosecutors value the footage as an investigative tool in criminal cases.

But critics asked the department to widen the cameras’ usage after an analysis by Mitchell determined that many use-of-force incidents were not recorded because not enough officers were wearing the cameras.

In his analysis, Mitchell determined that only about one out of every four use-of-force incidents was actually recorded.

Of 80 reported use of force incidents during the pilot program, 35 involved sergeants and other supervisors or officers working off duty. Off-duty officers are hired to work as private security and businesses pay their wages, but they wear police uniforms and must follow department policies and procedures.

Other failures happened because officers forgot to turn the cameras on or because of technical malfunctions.

On Friday, Mitchell said in a statement, “I commend Chief White for equipping officers working off duty with body cameras. I am evaluating the new body camera policy and will have further comment in the future.”

City Council approved money to buy the additional cameras, and the department will use grant money to help defray the costs, Henning said. Businesses who hire officers to work private security will be charged a nominal fee to help pay for the video storage, he said.

All officers in the six districts, traffic unit and gang unit were issued body cameras by the end of 2016, Henning said. In recent months, another 400 or so officers have been issued cameras and trained on how to use them.

Officers do not continually record their actions. Instead, they turn the cameras on during an enforcement action, Henning said. So an officer working at a Rockies baseball game would start recording only if he was responding to a complaint at the stadium.

Officers also have been issued docking stations to take home so they can download footage to a secure storage site, Henning said. Previously, officers had to download footage at their district stations, and they did not want to be forced to drive across the city after working off-duty assignments to do so.

Nick Rogers, president of the Denver Police Protective Association, said the union was not included in the latest body camera expansion and revised policy for using them, even though the union had prevailed in a court case where a judge ruled they were entitled to negotiate those policies. The city has appealed the judge’s decision.

Rogers, who said he had not read the entire policy, questioned whether a requirement that officers download footage within two hours of finishing their shifts would violate overtime policies.

Despite the continuing criticism, the Denver Police Department has one of the most expansive body camera policies in the country, Henning said. The department’s officers have been receptive to wearing them.

Noelle Phillips, a Nashville native and a Western Kentucky University journalism school grad, covers law enforcement and public safety for The Denver Post. She has spent more than 20 years in the newspaper world. During that time, she's covered everything from rural towns in the Southeast to combat in the Middle East. The Denver Post is her fifth newspaper and her first in the West.

More in Crime & Courts

The Larimer County coroner on Sunday performed an autopsy on the body found on a farm just east of Loveland Saturday, but the office will not release the cause of death or the identity of the person until they can track down next of kin.