"In
the first year of his reign I Daniel understood by books the number of the years,
whereof the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah the prophet" (Dan. 9:2.)

The above verse should
be read and re-read by Protestants and Catholics alike, for what we see here is how
one of the Bible's most respected prophets, when in dire straits, didn't go to his
priest, king or even his fellow man, but to the written word of God, for help and
answers!

If only Rome and Protestantism
did likewise, than perhaps the Inquisition and Reformation may have been avoided.

Here is Rome's weak
stance on the inspired word of God:

"It is not from Sacred
Scripture alone that the [Catholic] Church draws her certainty about everything which
has been revealed. Both Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture are to be accepted and
venerated with the same sense of loyalty and reverence."

While compiling this
article, I was in an e-mail correspondence with an Australian Catholic professor of
Asian languages, who regrettably was under the false impression that Catholic apologists
had rather successfully refuted Sola Scriptura. He also went on to tell me that the
doctrine of Sola Scriptura was a 16th century one. While it is true that the Reformers
did take a firm and bold stand for the re-implementation of Sola Scriptura, in their
defence however, all they were doing was faithfully returning to the early churches
position on this, something that had since become completely lost and confused.

The early church leaders
believed and taught Sola Scriptura. One was Irenaeus, who amazingly wrote a letter
titled Against Heresy.

This was written because
of the dangerous and pagan Gnostics, who falsely claimed that they had extra Biblical
authority/tradition, other than what the church had.

Irenaeus would go on
to successfully refute the Gnostics' claim, that not only were they and they alone
able and capable of interpreting Holy Scripture, but that the Bible was not sufficient
for all areas of doctrine. Yet, incredibly, centuries later, this argument was now
reversed with Rome replacing the Gnostics, and Bible-believing Christians replacing
Irenaeus!

Other church leaders which clearly and distinctly affirmed Sola Scriptura, were Tertullian,
Cyril of Jerusalem, and St. Patrick who through their letters went out of their way
to uphold Scripture as their final and ultimate authority!

Tragically, the Catholic
church gives the Bible mere lip service:

"There is no evidence
that Christ ever told His disciples to write books, or promised them His help in doing
so...so far as we can learn from the pages of the New Testament, the Apostles did
not leave any list of inspired writings, and, except in one solitary instance, they
never once even allude to the fact that there were any inspired writings at all, except
those of old" (A Catholic Dictionary, St. John's Seminary, Wonersh, p. 168).

Yet the same church that thinks nothing of shattering
one's faith of apostolic authority in Holy Scripture will fight tooth and nail when
it comes to their favourite passages being legitimate.

Try telling a Catholic,
for example, that Matthew 16:18 isn't apostolic, or John 20:23. Tell them that we
can't be sure whether Matthew actually got the words of the Lord right, or perhaps
this whole chapter isn't found in the best manuscripts. Watch them, all of a sudden,
become Catholic fundamentalists who believe the whole Bible to be God breathed (Matt.
15:8).

Imagine having a conversation
with a church leader in Corinth or Galatia, say the early second century. After the
pleasantries are finished, you are told that one must keep the Jewish feasts, and
even have your son circumcised if you wish to be saved from your sins. You obviously
object to this, only to be told that this leader once knew Paul and Peter, and as
a faithful disciple has "apostolic authority." With the apostles now dead, how on
earth would you be expected to know if he was telling you the truth or not? Without
the word of God, one is totally blind to the truth of God's will.

Because Catholics like
to cite church leaders as being "apostolic" and "successes" to the apostles, and elevate
their writings to be on par with Scripture, this leads to major problems and subsequent
heresies. To avoid this, we must always examine church councils, papal encyclicals,
and the church "fathers" in light of Scripture, and never the other way around.

The
Bible is inspired and preserved. We can trust it totally.

Paul commended the Bereans
in Acts for examining him and what he said in light of Scripture.

The Bible makes the
following statements concerning itself and its total sufficiency for the man of God:

"This is the disciple
which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony
is true" (John 21:24).

"Wherefore I take you
to record this day, that I am pure from the blood of all men. For I have not shunned
to declare unto you all the counsel of God" (Acts 20:26).

"All scripture is
given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction,
for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect,
throughly furnished unto all good works" (2 Tim. 3:16-17).

"For I testify unto
every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If
any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto
him the plagues that are written in this book: And
if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God
shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out
of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book" (Rev. 22:18).

It should be obvious
by now, that God takes His word very seriously, and will punish those that try and
undermine one's confidence in it.

Conclusion

The following quote
came from Cardinal Joseph Suenens, who said the following in 1974, while attending
a charismatic ecumenical convention in Chicago, and this is what Catholics have been
trying to get some of our less educated Christian friends to do, for centuries:

"Fly as high as
you want with Mary for one wing and Peter as the other [typical, no mention of Jesus.]
The trouble with you [that those of us that still believe the Bible] is that you are
in bondage [that's rich, coming from a priest] to the Bible."