The Double Standard of Morality

Josephine Butler, The Philanthropist (October, 1886)

As a floating straw indicates the flow
of the tide, so there are certain expressions that have become almost
proverbial and till lately have passed unchallenged in conversation and
in literature, plainly revealing the double standard of morality which
society has accepted. One of these expressions is, "He is only sowing
his wild oats;" another is, that "a reformed profligate makes
a good husband." The latter is a sentiment so gross that I would
not repeat it, if it were not necessary to do so - as a proof of the extent
of the aberration of human judgment in this matter.

Here we are at once brought into contact
with the false and misleading idea that the essence of right and wrong
is in some way dependent on sex. We never hear it carelessly or complacently
asserted of a young wom[a]n that "she is only sowing her wild oats."
This is not a pleasant aspect of the question; but let us deal faithfully
with it. It is a fact, that numbers even of moral and religious people
have permitted themselves to accept and condone in man what is fiercely
condemned in woman.

And do you see the logical necessity involved
in this? It is that a large section of female society has to be told off - set
aside, so to speak, to minister to the irregularities of the excusable
man. That section is doomed to death, hurled to despair; while another
section of womanhood is kept strictly and almost forcibly guarded in domestic
purity. Thus even good and moral men have so judged in regard to the vice
of sexual immorality as to concede in social opinion all that the male
profligate can desire. This perverse social and public opinion is no small
incentive to immorality. It encourages the pernicious belief that men
may be profligate when young without serious detriment to their character
in after-life. This is not a belief that is borne out by facts.

Marriage does not transform a man's
nature, nor uproot habits that have grown with his years: the licentious
imagination continues its secret blight, though the outward conduct may
be restrained. The man continues to be what he was, selfish and unrestrained,
though he may be outwardly moral in deference to the opinion of that "society"
which having previously excused his vices, now expects him to be moral.
And what of that other being, his partner - his wife - into whose presence
he brings the secret consciousness, it may be the hideous morbid fruits
of his former impurity? Can any man, with any pretension to true manliness,
contemplate calmly the shame - the cruelty - of the fact that such marriages
are not exceptional, especially in the upper classes?

The consequences of sins of impurity far
out-last the sin itself, both in individuals and in communities. Worldly
and impure men have thought, and still think, they can separate women,
as I have said, into two classes - the protected and refined ladies who
are not only to be good, but who are, if possible, to know nothing except
what is good; and those poor outcast daughters of the people whom they
purchase with money, and with whom they think they may consort in evil
whenever it pleases them to do so, before returning to their own separated
and protected homes.

The double standard of morality owes its
continued existence very greatly to the want of a common sentiment concerning
morality on the part of men and women, especially in the more refined
classes of society. Men are driven away at an early age from the society
of women and thrown upon the society of each other only - in schools, colleges,
barracks, etc.; and thus they have concocted and cherished a wholly different
standard of moral purity from that generally existing among women. Even
those men who are personally pure and blameless become persuaded by the
force of familiarity with male profligacy around them, that this sin in
man is venial and excusable. They interpret the ignorance and silence
of women as indulgent acquiescence and support.

Women are guilty also in this matter, for
they unfortunately have imitated the tone and sentiments of men, instead
of chastening and condemning them; and have shown, too often, very little
indeed of the horror which they profess to feel for sins of impurity.
Now we have the profound conviction that not only must as many men and
women as possible severally understand the truth concerning their relations
to each other, but also that they must learn the lesson in each other's
presence, and with each other's help. A deeply-reaching mutual sympathy
and common knowledge must (if we are ever to have any real reform) take
the place of the life-long separation and antipathetic sentiments which
have prevailed in the past.

Obviously, then, the essence of the great
work which we propose to ourselves, is to Christianize public opinion,
until both in theory and practice, it shall recognize the fundamental
truth that the essence of right and wrong is in no way dependent upon
sex, and shall demand of men precisely the same chastity as it demands
of women.

It is a tremendous work which we have on
hand. Licentiousness is blasting the souls and bodies of thousands of
men and women, chiefly through the guilt of the men of the upper and educated
classes. The homes of the poor are blighted - the women among the poor
are crushed - by this licentiousness, which ever goes hand in hand with
the most galling tyranny of the strong over the weak. The press and the
pulpit, apparently dismayed by the enormity of the evil, the one sometimes
in sympathy with it, the other losing faith in the power of God and in
spiritual revival, have ceased altogether to administer any adequate rebuke.
In our homes and in social circles mistaken delicacy has come to the aid
of cowardice, and the truth is betrayed even in the house of its friends.
The warnings of God are concealed, and young men and women are left to
be taught by sad and irremediable experience the moral truths which should
be impressed upon them early in life by faithful instructors.

Who is behind this website?
My name is Owen Mulpetre (BA, MPhil), a historian turned web designer and I founded this website in 2001. Since then, it has been used by students, scholars and institutions around the world. It is today the largest online resource on the life and career of W.T. Stead.

If you have a question or query, or you are interested in my web design services, please feel free to Contact me
(but please don't ask me to do your research for you!)