August 06, 2018

Re: The Democratic Party: What you have here is a POLITICAL PARTY tying to overthrow the legitimate government of the USA with acts of force and violence. I don't know what YOU call that, but I call it WAR. The USA is at WAR with the Democratic Party and their sycophants, and the USA seems unable to properly fight back. THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE USA CONSTITUTION WAS NEVER INTENDED TO BE A COVER FOR REBELLION VS USA GOVERNMENT.

President Trump, the "shrug and hope it goes away" strategy has failed. For starters, the Democratic Party needs to be sued out of existance as a Racketeer-Influenced Corrupt Organization, and doing so would be a slam-dunk court case. If this fails to stop the Democrats, then bump it up: POTUS can, as the legitimate Head of State, declare in the United Nations that the USA is in a state of violent armed rebellion. POTUS uses Article 51 of the UN Charter for that (self-defense of members allowed).

If the riots, etc, persist, the President can call out the Militia, and order the Armed Forces to support it. Can you see Pantifa standing up against a Well-Regulated Militia trained and equipped to use deadly force and commanded by officers with ONE order only: Restore Order and end the leftist predations? I can't see that happening.

At some point, the POTUS will need to ask the SCOTUS to remove the jurisdiction of the lower Courts in favor of the Militia's use of the Universal Code of Military Justice during the Restoration period. Yes, that would be the dreaded "martial law", but the USA has already had Martial Law four times that I can read about in the History books: War of 1812, Civil War, World Wars One and Two, each time applied in varying degrees to keep the USA safe from it's sworn enemies.

It's WAR, Mr. Trump. It's not fun, it's not nice, but we have it now, deliberate WAR brought by the Democratic Party. Please, Mr. President, REMOVE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UTTERLY FROM OUR POLITICS, CULTURE AND MIDST.

We are close to having to rise up in our own counter-rebellion, start a Civil War and do the job ourselves. That would be ugly, and leftists from outside of our borders would probably try to get involved on the Democrats' side. Follow my plan to take out the Democrats, Mr. President, and you have no worries about exterior forces coming into play.

June 20, 2018

1. The elected President can't get a thing done, the bureaucracy and Legislative and Judicial branches, most from the past President, actively oppose Trump's Administration, even to the point of calling their oppositon "The Resistance", a term of WAR.

2. The GOP, the President's Party, mostly opposes the President. The GOP "majority" in the Senate is a joke, because at least 6 Senators would rather vote with the opposition Party 90% of the time.

3. The borders are porous and open, all manner of undesireable aliens sneak in and the bureaucracy lets them stay, believing that at some point, resolve will break down and they will be offered Amnesty and become opposition-party voters.

4. The "Resistance" has the nerve to invade a restaurant and chase out a CABINET SECRETARY dining there.

5. The Military is forced to take morale-destroying trans-gender people in as combat troops.

June 16, 2018

The Democrats say that they are going to run Bernie against Trump in 2020. THAT makes sense, because he was second-best behind Crooked Hillary in '16, might even have gotten the nod to run vs Trump except for HRC's fixing several primaries.

So, what will such a 2020 race bring?

It will bring, in short, simply the most starkly different two candidates this Nation has EVER seen run against each other. Bernie Sanders is a Communist. Yes, a COMMUNIST, NOT A SOCIALIST (as even he claims). How do we know that? Easy: the changes he wants to make will have to be made at the point of a gun, or they won't get made. As I've said before on this blog, Socialism at the point of a gun IS Communism.

So, the Democratic party, should it win the election, plans to point guns at citizens and make them to things they otherwise wouldn't do (such as double the Income Tax of the middle class). If YOU were one of those Democrat leaders, wouldn't YOU want to take the citizens' guns away first? It could get real messy those guns were still out there.

I rest my case.

Moral of this little story?

If you don't want to be Communist, citizens of our USA, work to save your 2A. The 2A IS the only thing that will prevent Communism here.

June 15, 2018

Item one on #FrightfulFriday: Facebook Jail. Yep, I dared to piss off some real, by-God, Canadian Loons, and they snitched me off for writing a lampoonish comment about their Loon-in-chief, Justin Trudeau, whom I called "Junior Trudeau" (true, that: look it up, his father is still alive!). I referred negatively to Junior's "Letting the Muzzies in" immigration policy, in those words. I'm suspended, under THREAT of permanent banning, but those ASSWIPES at Facebook won't even tell me what behavior it is I have to change to stay on the FacePlace, other than I commited "hate speech", which is so vague a charge it could NEVER be used in any court to convict ANYONE. Just like a meglo, isn't that? "I'm God and YOU can't question me." You don't suppose that reference to WASPs (White Anglo Saxon Protestants) would be Hate Speech now, do you? I was called a WASP damn near every day in high school, and that School is considered one of the most PeeCee in the country, and has been for 100 years. Here's news FacePlace can use: I have contacted a civil rights attorney in Kali, and am inquiring about sending the Zuckerbooger a Cease and Desist letter, maybe even a Tort Claim.

Item Two: I waited, and now it's here, TAAAH-DAAAH! Savage's Model 110 Tactical rifle. I'm interested in Stock Number 57007, the .308 with 24" barrel. With this barrel length, heavier bullets can be loaded with slower-burning powders which are calculated to burn completely in the longer barrel, accelerating the bullet to a better velocity, almost as good as 300 WIN Magnum. The MSRP is $784 (Streets @ $606.99 at Grab-a-gun.com), very nice for a rifle of this capability, likely a half-MOA or better. Looks like I might be able to put together the rifle, the good glass and whatever else I need, maybe even a can for around $2500. Some 168-gr match and the tables look good at out past 500 yards. Yowza. One shot, one (nevermind).

So, I'm back on here, and on Twitter (@straightcase) and on MeWe (George Schneider) or the email attached to this blog.

March 15, 2018

This would be the most severe gun-grab in the Nation, if passed. A group calling itself "Interfaith Leaders" proposes to ban all semi-automatic, or magazine-fed firearms. The article says just "Assault Rifles", but the boasting out of the Commissar Knutson's "Church" (bull. commies don't have churches) was to include all semi-autos fed by magazines.

The Initiative process, by which Commissar Knutson proposes to enact this law, is operated by the State of Oregon, so...(my Facebook Post)

My answer to the "Inter-Faith Group" seeking to ban all semi-automatic firearms in Oregon - Here is YOUR future:

1. You have ALREADY conspired to restrict or remove an enumerated Right of the Bill of Rights. You have done that just by MEETING to discuss your ill-conceived Initiative. Legally, that means that Probable Cause might already exist for your arrest on 18 USC 242, Denial of Civil Rights under Color of Authority.

2. "Under Color of Authority" will probably have to be decided in a courtroom, but this 25-year Officer of the Circuit Court of Multnomah County believes that the "Authority" of the State of Oregon is extended willingly down to reside in those following the Initiative Process. The fact that this Initiative IS a de-jure Denial of Civil Rights cannot even be challenged.

3. Prior to the Finding that the Initiative Process DEPENDS on the Color of Authority of the State of Oregon, there is another legal facet to be perfected. That facet is the Racketeer-Influenced Corrupt Organization designation which will apply to the organizers, from the Chief Petitioner on down to the signature-collectors. Under any declaration that a criminal conspiracy exists (a simple True Bill from a Federal Grand Jury or a USAG's Information) the RICO process may be initiated. That process will freeze ALL the assets of the named conspirators, the financial supporters and yes, perhaps even the signers of the Petition (the instrumentality of the criminal conspiracy). A VERY wide swath can be cut by the RICO process, and it might indeed ensnare all governmental officials who had provable Notice of the Petition, were in a position to stop the approval of the Petition but didn't, and maybe even the Judge who approved the ballot title. BTW, for the uninformed, once a judgment of RICO has been rendered, the defendants may be assessed as much as treble damages, in addition to Court Costs, Attorney Fees and all such expense.

4. The final Sword of Damocles hanging over this entire legal proceeding would be Class Action. I believe that there are over two million gun owners in Oregon, and each would be entitled to join in a Class as Plaintiffs, seeking common damages. I should think that those damages would be at least $10K/Plaintiff, which would put the erstwhile gun-grabbers on the legal hook for $20 Billion dollars. Considering the VERY deep pockets of the likes of Soros, Steyer, Bloomberg and other Limousine Liberals who can be expected to empower this conspiracy via their wealth, they probably DO HAVE $20B amongst them.

Your essayist begs for many, many Shares, so someone at the top of this anti-Civil Rights cabal will get my notice. Pass this word, please!

February 10, 2018

The money-pundits are full of themselves this morning. Fox' usual Saturday-morning gang, are blasting the very heavens with "Three Trillion Dollars Lost to the Economy"...

That's bullcrap. Yes, the total losses WERE that high, but only if you also consider the failed gambles of derivatives trading the same as stock losses.

Nowhere do I see the figures on the losses of the actual market value of companies such as Caterpillar, US Steel, Ford Motor Co. etc.

This wild sell-off see-saw started with Investment Bankers tinkering with Derivatives, especially Goldman's Vix funds. There is NO earthly reason that actual investment funds should EVER be spent on wild gambles such as betting how wide the sweeps between losses and gains will be in certain time frames (that's "Vix", or in long-form, Variability-factor X).

Vix is a calculated factor used in the Arbitrage Theory of predicting price variations in equities, but it's only one such factor of many. Paying for "Vix Shares", or guesses where the swings will wind up, makes no more sense that betting on the daily "Handle" (total amount bet at the betting windows) for a horse or dog-racing track.

I don't follow the pricing of Vix Shares a sold by Goldman, but I DID hear a blurb on the news about a week ago which said that GS had somehow jacked up the price of those shares to over three thousand dollars per share, and their scarcity is one of the things that started this sell-off.

Yours Truly went to a private high school in DeeCee, the Maret School, and as a Junior, my Annual Thesis (long term-paper, got A-minus on it) was about how Goldman Sachs created the Crash of 1929 by introducing a CHAIN of three investment banks so as to allow highly leveraged trading. By running your funds through this chain, you could buy on 10% margin, so 0.1% actual cash went into your stock purchases (ten percent of ten percent of ten percent). They did this AGAIN with Derivatives trading in 2009, and now they have their Vix Bank (CBOE) trying it again, right on the heels of messing with the cryptocurrencies, which RAISED the Vix and helped them make their Vix shares so expensive. It's all in here.

If the entire brain trust of Goldman Sachs were frog-marched off to Gitmo tomorrow, first, they would be in the right place, and second, that would leave fiscal-advisor vacancies on the Trump Team, another benefit, because we can ALL do without the historic fiscal meddling of this cabal of bankers.

December 13, 2017

The only proper thing to do here from a Conflict Management point of view is to take out a major Swamp-rat. Part of me says that targeted rat should be Mitch the Bitch, but another part of me says take out a major rat who has fewer pawns protecting him, so I'd target John McCain.

Police profiling is not new, the Brits did it (Sir Robert Peel) some 180 years ago. My profiling training associates criminal propensity (likelihood of doing crimes) with demonstrated personality traits. In McCain's case, the man is personally a craven coward, but one with a huge ego. In my profiling experience, that makes him a VERY likely target for the #MeToo crowd, since these personality traits are common in sex-harassers. John McCain has only one protector of note, and that's his daughter Meghan. She is LGBTQEIEIO, so when her dad is attacked, she will interpose herself like the pawn she is. When she interposes, she will start spouting the usual LGBTQEIEIO drivel about haters, etc. If I was the OIC running this attack, I would be ready for that, and would have some Hanoi Hilton survivors ready to take HER on. Once that pawn is down, John the Rook is vulnerable, because John McCain is too stupid to even think about the protective moves of Castling (yes, Chess 101, despite my Dad being a Master, I never got much farther than Novice).

Given his fragile state of health, McCain is a soft target, but except for the Majority Leader, he is the best-known RINO. I think that when the heat is REALLY brought, McCain will retire. That gives AZ-GOP the opportunity to appoint a real Conservative.

If conservatives can take out McCain, there is a good possibility that McConnell will pass the baton.

Now, for Trump. POTUS has to realize by now that his GOP "Majority" was never worth the paper it was printed on. The chances of getting ANYTHING contentious through the Senate are remote. It is time for Trump to change modes. He was correct in trying to work with the system for his first year, but now it's time to get down and dirty. If he starts swinging a serious Hammer, he can make side-deals with the Asses in the Senate from his position of power.

The first swing of the hammer should target the Clintons. He needs a real "war-time Consigliere" now, so he might have to let Sessions go, since Sessions has more allegiance to the Swamp than to POTUS. Once he is definitely set on a path to indict the Clintons (both of them) for their obvious corruption, then the Donks will come to him and try to talk him out of it. I would strike a hard bargain if I were Trump: I would demand that ALL my nominations be fast-tracked to confirmation, and when that was all done, he could think about pardoning the Clintons. I might even raise the price of that deal some and demand all the confirmations PLUS the declared "resistance" is withdrawn.

Trump has good hole cards. He has the goods on Senator Fauxcahontas, on Senator Gillibrand and a couple others, all of whom have been mentioned as possible POTUS contenders in '20. He needs to use some of his clout now. Doing that will put the Left on notice that their gaining of one seat has meant nothing to them.

The game is BASEBALL, Mr. Trump, not slow-pitch mushball as you've been playing up to now.

December 05, 2017

@POTUS has been winning on so many fronts. We on the Right are happy, but we should take warning, too.

The defeated Left is not going to go down quietly, or simply recalculate for another fight later. As I sense their desperation, they are about to play their final card, and this card will be them fomenting a street revolt of a far worse nature than any we've seen so far. Think of Antifa on Meth. Well, probably a lot of them are, but Soros has been hiring them on the cheap, about $1500/month to respond to his call.

What we look for now in this profile is evidence that he has seriously bumped those Wages of Sin. When we see that, you won't wait long to see the bullets fly.

November 29, 2017

We presently have a full-blown Constitutional Crisis in progress. What gets done about it will determine if the "malaise" our Nation suffers through with the polarized Parties gets bad enough to drive us to Civil War, or whether a remedy can be found to put us on the track back towards Constitutional governance. Spoiler: I think that Civil War is already here. Read on...

Within two days after Trump won the election last year, the Democrats had declared "The Resistance". The purpose of this "Resistance" was simple: throw every possible roadblock in the way of the then-coming Trump Administration. As a party, the Democrats have fairly efficient internal cohesion, and they had obviously planned this as a fall-back in case their "inevitable" Hillary failed to win.

Next, Trump himself made some major mistakes. Early on after his victory, he messed around with grabbing advisers from anywhere he could find them. It was obvious that Trump was unprepared to implement his victory, because most of the "advisers" he selected early on were rats, like General Flynn. His campaign staffers SHOULD have been at work for months pre-selecting these people, but they failed to get that started, and Trump failed to notice that failure.

After inauguration, the Democrat's path became obvious, and it has been obvious ever since: slow the formation of Trump's Cabinet down to a crawl, denying him any impetus of movement. Not only the Democratic Party is involved in that, but the Liberal Judiciary is as well, allowing the filing of a blizzard of lawsuits against just about everything Trump has tried in the way of reforms in many different governmental processes. This slow-roll is VERY effective, and it will get worse.

How worse can it get, my astute Readers must be asking? Look at the little stunt that was pulled yesterday: Trump asked for a meeting with Democrat leaders Pelosi and Schumer, and they both failed to show up for the meeting! BTW, this is NOT a new trick, the Democrats pulled this to stymie the incoming GOP Legislature in Texas a few years back. In that case, the entire Democratic register of that Assembly left the State to avoid having to turn the Legislature over to the GOP which had won a majority.

Okay, you have the picture. Now I will ask the question that all the above history was written down to bring forward: When does this "Resistance" become an actual Rebellion against the constituted AND Constitutional authority of Mr. Trump and his party, the Republicans?

My answer is that it ALREADY is a definable and actual rebellion. First, it is a carefully-planned operation with the specific goal of refusing to allow the duly-elected Administration of President Trump to effectively hold office and proceed with his duties of Chief Executive Officer of the USA. Second, there is plenty of evidence that parts of this rebellious operation have been financed from offshore, by elements of international Marxism, specifically George Soros, who has budgeted 18 Billion dollars of his huge fortune to bring Trump's governance to a halt. Finally, there is the violence aspect, with the Marxist street-gang calling itself "Antifa", another Soros-paid operation.

In my not-so-humble opinion, this Nation is already involved in Civil War: The Left, and their political arm, the Democrats, have seceded from the United States of America.

October 25, 2017

The mustachioed FB Alarm-Clock avatar says to Rise and Shine, and I have done so, and so has my Linux Ubuntu. My first waking thought:

I read yesterday, courtesy of my Friend Anita, that the Chinese Communist Party has just elevated President Xi to the same status in the Party previously held only by Chairman Mao Zedong. Xi's very THOUGHTS become sacred Communist doctrine now. Best of luck to Xi, he has a big country to run, and it has a big Capitalist sector in the Three Provinces which are allowed that anti-Communist doctrine, Mao didn't have that dichotomy to work around.

Of course, we have our own Communists right here in our US of A, and they have a Militant Wing, calling itself the "Antifa". This gang of commie militants intends to put on a YUGE nation-wide militant display Saturday after next, and they say that their effort is aimed at ENDING the Trump/Pence Administration. In MY military counter-insurgency training, that would be called a Marxist Revolution, but I'm not Commander-in-Chief, President Trump is. Were I in charge, I would have gone before the UN Security Council by now, declared my Nation in a state of Armed Revolt, declared Article Fifty-One in effect, and then suppressed Antifa with great force and prejudice, using NorthCom troops. Trump won't do that, so We The Peeps will have to defend ourselves against this violent horde.

There IS one other possible way to handle Antifa, though. Suppose Trump appealed to President Xi, who is without doubt the strongest Communist leader right now (eat your heart out, Vladimir Putin!). Perhaps Xi could issue a command to Antifa that they act ONLY under the direct command of the Chinese Communist Party, and that the ChiCom Party would take it very badly if they refused to do that, perhaps badly enough to use Chinese PLA resources against Antifa. Perhaps those could start with terminating the Antifa command of George Soros, with great prejudice...

Maybe, just maybe, there might be some good available in ORGANIZED Communism....(satire/off).