Tuesday Night Radio: Michael Ellis on the IRS

18Mar

American Independence Hour hosted by Alfred Adask; 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM Central time, Tuesday nights, on AmericanVoiceRadio.com and also on the KU band, free-to-air satellite link at Galaxy 19. There’ll be call-ins at 1-800-596-8191

American Independence Hour–Internet Radio[courtesy Google Images]

I’ve known Michael Ellis for about 20 years. He’s articulate, intelligent, and a man who really loves the Good LORD.

@ >But I didn’t plan on looking for email message in the “comments” section while the show was on the air.

Sorry. I was hoping you might check during a commercial break. There is no use in trying to explain why I asked that Administrative Court Question. I understood just like you did & as you explained previously what transpires in an administrative court. I just wanted to see what Michael had to say about them. I did not know any other way to get my question entered,etc. I cannot call in I have tried to explain why. I’ll try to lay low for a while.

Al, thanks for bringing Michael on the show. If his efforts will actually be useful for everyone else, as you were asking about, it will certainly help us never filers.

If he’s successful in getting his injunction, wouldn’t his case be referenceable for others as case law is used? It wouldn’t be supreme court opinion, but it would be precedent, wouldn’t it? Your thoughts?

If Michael can succeed, he’ll have proved that: 1) his analysis; and 2) his court procedure have worked in at least one instance. After that, it’s up to others to try to reproduce both the analysis and the procedure to get a similar result. But even if Michael succeeds, it’ll be possible for others who copy his work exactly to fail at the trial court level because different judges and different prosecutors can see things differently.

If Michael fails, we’ll be left to figure out whether his analysis was faulty or his procedure was faulty or both were faulty.

No matter how adept any litigant may be, court is always a crapshoot where you might win and you might lose. Any study you do will, at best, only increase the probability that you MAY win. There are never any guarantees.

Your description of the opportunity to be heard, with 98% chance of guilty verdict, helped me to reason that it’s probably best to stay out of “court”. I’ve already hit in the 2% category, but that was before much more research, so going back odds would be even greater that I’d join the 98%…

Unless a true common law court is available. Do you think one still exists anywhere?

I”m not sure about the common law courts. I may be that there’s one or two such courts hidden away in each state. Maybe one in Washington DC. Maybe they’re all over but it’s up to each of us to open our local courts in a way that causes the court to act in the common law capacity rather than an administrative capacity. It’s a mystery that remains to be understood.

There is one. I believe using the 1789 Constitution provisions applicable to “that Court” is the way to open the door to “that court.” But, it’s not for everybody. Only the posterity of, “We the people.” Also, there are a couple of “other things” that need to be known & understood..