Category Archives: Appall – I – Tics

The proposal will likely require the support of some Democrats if it is to pass the House. Some liberal Democrats opposed it because it does not include an agreement to protect from deportation hundreds of thousands of ‘ Dreamers ‘ Young people brought illegally to the United States as children. In voicing her opposition , House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi set the record for the longest continuous speech in House history, an EIGHT-HOUR effort that included reading letters from Dreamers pleading to be allowed to stay in the United States …

That is just far TOO BRUTAL to even begin to comprehend !!! …

Having to sit there and listen to this stupid left wing bitch babble and bleat for EIGHT HOURS !!!…

As I was perusing the news this morning , as is the usual routine to start my day around 5:00 a.m. , I chanced upon a few articles of typical media amplified ‘ non – issues ‘ then stumbled on to Rex. The Murphster doesn’t get much on the main pages and I neglect to punch his name in to search … I shall jot down a reminder to myself to do so in the furure. I tend to agree with him 90 odd percent of the time but no matter what his opinion is … He has a marvelously witty , somewhat sarcastic ( which I REALLY appreciate ! ) style of thought presentation plus a refreshing depth of vocabulary … A seemingly lost virtue in today’s ‘ spell it incorrectly enough times and Webster will change it’s dictionary for you ” society …

Take it away Mr. Murphy …

Save for its defiant originality, decapitation by one’s own hand has little to recommend it as a political tactic. Apart from the advanced demands it places on the carpet cleaners, it leaves very little opportunity for followup. There is, for example the teasing question of where, or even if, to place the mike at subsequent press briefings. Many are therefore puzzled, even to the outer limits of perplexity, that the Ontario Tories have twice called in the guillotine as the opening gambit for this year’s June election campaign. In the words of the prime minister’s favourite poet, these past two weeks the Ontario Tories “went downward to darkness on extended wings.” …

Let us reprise the highlights ;

Less than 11 days ago the Tories, under the pristine leadership of Patrick Brown, were in clear and present danger of winning the election soon to fall on this province. Premier Kathleen Wynne was at a place in the polls vividly captured by the verbal cameo “lower than a snake’s belly.” High officials of the Liberal party had been dragged through court proceedings. Outrage at power prices had roiled the populace.

The shamanry — pundits, pollsters and prognosticators — all agreed : The Tories could fall asleep for the next few months, and victory was theirs. Fortunately, they took stock of the peril in time, and proceeded with the flair for which they have won renown, to blow up their chances in as comprehensive a detonation as the supplies at hand allowed.

First, that tornado of incontinent zeal sweeping the continent, #MeToo, came down on the political trailer park, briskly funnelling leader Patrick Brown from the scene, and then extending its ruinating siphon to the party president, Rick Dykstra. Leader and president, both gone within four days. Now, as Lady Bracknell might observe, it is one thing to lose the new leader of your party, but only true virtuosos can throw in a party president a few days later. Some might haggle that these “losses” could not be directly credited to the party itself, but I fear this can only be argued by those ignorant of the more recent history of this baffling institution. Misfortune doesn’t just pay random visits to the Ontario Conservative party: it recognizes the party as its home and native land. It has fulsomely and with abandon been handing off elections to the provincial Liberals for nearly a full decade now. Does its constitution make losing obligatory?

On the experience of recent times the question is reasonable.

MORBNOTE ; Now , to be fair , old Rex has mellowed somewhat with age ( or maybe we’ve all just gotten used to him ! ) … But in his younger days you’d tend to cross over the street if he was comin’ your way down the sidewalk !!! … I mean Marty Feldman at least was kinda cute in a somewhat warped way … But THIS guy ?!! …

” Get the kids back in the car Martha !!! … He’s comin’ toward us !!! ” …

Put an R2-D2 sock in it … Knock it off with this pathological need to sidle up to the nearest microphone to gab, yak, chat, hold court , shoot the breeze , riff or push platitudes like a guest speaker at a kindergarten class while hopped up on ecstasy :

“ Children , there is no ‘I’ in love. But there is a ‘U’ in ‘Justin’ and in ‘Trudeau.’ I am you. You are me. We are love. Now pick up your crayons and let’s draw a gender-neutral sun.”

Forget climate change , terrorism , potential war or a volatile stock market. The biggest threat to Canada right now ? It is our leader’s mouth.

Consider the global ridicule that emerged from a now viral clip. During a recent town hall in Edmonton , a young woman is asking a meandering question when Trudeau get distracted by a certain word, as if it’s a T-bone and he’s a Rottweiler. So he interrupts to gnaw on her questionable language.

Woman: “ . . . so that’s why we came here today to ask you to also look into the policies that religious charitable organizations have in our legislation so that it can also be changed , because maternal love is the love that’s going to change the future of mankind. So we’d like you …

Junior interjects ; ” We like to say ‘peoplekind,’ not necessarily mankind , because it’s more inclusive.”

Now , if such a tortured , ridiculous neologism had tumbled from the lips of another politician , he or she may have gotten a pass. Given the reaction of the woman and crowd …

“Exactly!” she squealed , as others laughed …

It’s possible Trudeau was playing on her query and engaging in some lighthearted self-mockery. Indeed , as peoplekind turned into peoplekind-gate on Wednesday , Trudeau blamed the brouhaha on bad comedy genes. He said peoplekind was just a “dumb joke.” But whether it was a botched punchline or a window into how the unicorns in his brain run wild , Trudeau should be deeply disturbed by how most of the international media now assume it was the latter. It wasn’t just conservative outlets that had a field day. Peoplekind spread like a virus , infecting Europe , Asia and South America with bouts of laughter. Trudeau didn’t get a pass on peoplekind because , at this point , his mouth has chewed up any benefit of the doubt. How can peoplekind be a dumb joke when it’s so damn believable ?

Due to his pandering obsession with identity politics , even his biggest admirers know he is probably capable of making up a word and insisting the change is good for all :

“ From this day forth , we shall refer to mangos as peoplegos.” Running the country as if it’s a social media thread punctuated by emojis and Likes — I’m sorry , but is that not what he does ? How can he possibly predict when the budget will be balanced when he’s touring more than U2 ? How can he govern like a policy wonk when he exists within a shallow realm of selfies and gibberish ? In fact , I’m now worried Trudeau may backtrack on this “dumb joke” explanation and make “peoplekind” compelled speech. If we as a nation are forced to contemplate the egalitarian benefits of “peoplekind,” there will be no time to ask questions about Canada Post, pipelines , military spending or NAFTA. There will be no time to follow up on any of the promises made by Trudeau’s mouth that were broken by Trudeau’s actions.

The more he talks , the more damage he inflicts on himself and, by extension , us. In the same town hall in which he made the peoplekind joke , Trudeau coldly told an ex-soldier who lost a leg in Afghanistan that the federal government is in court fighting over benefits because veterans groups are “ asking for more than we’re able to give.” He also bizarrely answered a question about the possible integration of ex-Daesh fighters into Canadian cities by riffing on discrimination faced by European immigrants who came here after the Second World War. Trudeau’s mouth has licked him into a corner. Trudeau’s mouth is now Trudeau’s greatest enemy. “ After climbing a great hill , one only finds that there are many more hills to climb,” observed Nelson Mandela. Or as Trudeau might call him , Nelson Peopledela. The problem here is the hills Trudeau will be forced to climb in the months ahead are constructed entirely from his hollow words. He says one thing and then either forgets he said it or does something else. It’s as if the country is run by a Magic 8 Ball.

So the forecast for Sunny Ways has changed dramatically , my friends. Storm clouds have gathered over the rhetorical prairies and verbal valleys. Our Prime Minister is getting heckled more than deadmau5 on a seniors cruise.

MORBNOTE ; Had to put this article in ( ALMOST ! ) in its’entirety … Got a kick out some of the guy’s lines … But something I’ve been saying from day one … Junior has always been a spoiled twerp that has no idea and thinks all the good vibes in the world will make everything ‘ OK ‘ …

Trump’s immigration stance has always been economic. At his core, the President is a liberal, insofar as that term means anything anymore. When he was appearing on Howard Stern’s show, and making money for NBC’s The Apprentice and guesting on NBC’s Days of Our Lives (which is why there was an Access Hollywood tape to begin with), everyone understood this.

Ideologues of Trumpism or Bannonism—which, as we are now seeing, never really existed—need not be mystified as to just how Ivanka Trump could have turned out to be such a liberal herself. There is no mystery here. Liberalism is the default position of all powerful Americans, including the Bushes, who support “same-sex marriage.” Some are just a little further to the right than others on the left-right spectrum of liberal America. Every one of them believes that, unlike all other countries, America is an Idea. They squabble over what exactly the Idea is, moving further left with each passing year, which is called “progress” and taught to America’s schoolchildren as such.

However coarsely put, Trump’s ideas about immigration reflect the fact that our current arrangement—where no argument against inviting future state-welfare recipients to the U.S. can be made without garnering accusations of racism—is unsustainable. It doesn’t take an Edmund Burke to recognize that there are a finite number of low-wage jobs in the U.S., and that filling them with illegal aliens (or paying to send the “Dreamers” to college) unbalances the scales for native-born citizens, whatever race they are. This is the message that Trump’s “Deplorables” responded to in November 2016.

So Trump refers to Haiti as a “sh-thole country” in that light, and Anderson Cooper, in turn, chokes back tears while describing the courage and bravery of Haitians, thus condemning Trump and his approach to immigration. What logic is this? Can brave and courageous people with dignity and value live in a “sh-thole”? Well. I happen to live in a city that the national media have gleefully described as a sh-thole for decades now. On every Sh-t List they can come up with, Rockford, Illinois, has a spot.

In bluntly vulgar language, President Donald Trump questioned Thursday why the U.S. would accept more immigrants from Haiti and “shithole countries” in Africa rather than places like Norway, as he rejected a bipartisan immigration deal, according to people briefed on the extraordinary Oval Office conversation.

Trump’s contemptuous description of an entire continent startled lawmakers in the meeting and immediately revived charges that the president is racist. The White House did not deny his remark but issued a statement saying Trump supports immigration policies that welcome “those who can contribute to our society.”Trump’s comments came as two senators presented details of a bipartisan compromise that would extend protections against deportation for hundreds of thousands of young immigrants — and also strengthen border protections, as Trump has insisted.The lawmakers had hoped Trump would back their accord, an agreement among six senators evenly split among Republicans and Democrats, ending a months-long, bitter dispute over protecting the “Dreamers.” But the White House later rejected it, plunging the issue back into uncertainty just eight days before a deadline that threatens a government shutdown.

Dick Durbin of Illinois, the Senate’ s No. 2 Democrat, explained that as part of that deal, a lottery for visas that has benefited people from Africa and other nations would be ended, the sources said, though there could be another way for them to apply. Durbin said people who would be allowed to stay in the U.S. included those who had fled here after disasters hit their homes in places such as El Salvador, Guatemala and Haiti.Trump specifically questioned why the U.S. would want to admit more people from Haiti.

As for Africa, he asked why more people from “shithole countries” should be allowed into the U.S., the sources said.The president suggested that instead, the U.S. should allow more entrants from countries like Norway. Trump met this week with Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg.

MORBNOTE ; This is what the folks south of the border wanted … The Donald is an individual that doesn’t bullshit and ‘ play the game ‘ of politics … ( When it comes to how he thinks about this sort of thing … Business deals … SURE !! … ALL successful business people have to be cunning in the art of bullschitzen ) …

He’s calling it as he sees it … Like MANY Americans that have to toil in the utopian society that career politicians ‘ envision ‘ yet conveniently isolate themselves from … He wants to change the status quo … The more definitive term for ‘ dreamers ‘ in this case would be ‘ scammers ‘ … No benefit to society … very little percentage contribute in the slightest … And certainly not worth the expenditure , when there’s so many other areas those billions could do some much needed good …

Confirming Hansen’s findings, the Daily Mail reports that “German authorities have been critici[z]ed for waiting almost six months to release pictures of a group of sex attackers – which immediately led to four arrests.” And “[d]espite the severity of the crime and the thugs being clearly visible on CCTV cameras, the German police did not publish their pictures, with a police chief blaming strict privacy laws.”Moreover, “[s]uspects in Germany, even those accused of murder, are identified only by their first name[s] and the first letter[s] of their surname[s] because of the country’s strict privacy laws.”

Finally, official German government figures have been revealed that show that “the huge 92% increase in crime and violence in Germany is the direct result of the massive invasion of Muslims pretending to be refugees.”A report titled the “Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham (1997-2013)” by Alexis Jay showcases one of the most chilling aspects of Hansen’s documentary. It is a “scandal involving rape, ethnicity, religion, and the willful failure of Britain’s public authorities to protect thousands of girls from horrific exploitation.”

It took fifteen years to attract the attention of the British political class. In fact, the “delay was due to a toxic combination of pathologies on the part of the authorities and the British media. And it all boiled down to a deliberate and even bizarrely principled refusal to speak the truth, no matter the consequences to the innocent.”Hansen interviewed victims and relatives and was stunned to discover that one child had 36-42 samples of sperm on her. Let that sickening fact sink in.The rapists and traffickers were of Pakistani heritage. Yet the British police state that “nothing can be done” to charge all of the rapists because then “we’ll be seen as racists.” The report states that “the difficult[y] that prevent[s] this issue being dealt with effectively is the ethnicity of the main perpetrators.” Additionally, “the police dared not act against Asian youths for fear of allegations of racism.” Notice the euphemistic use of the word “Asian.”

Mike is a book writer and reporter from across the pond … But it mirrors exactly what going on here … Read the excerpts from the article … Click the link for the whole thing …

As Ayn Rand wrote, “[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it.” But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts …

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women’s rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds.

For example:

The so-called Syrian refugees who come to Denmark actually return to their homeland for holiday vacations. Hansen interviews airline agents who confirm that there is a “peak season to Iraq.”

So much for the dangerous conditions for these so-called refugees.

What better way to economically cripple the West than with phony refugee claims? The number of migrants claiming German welfare benefits soared by 169 percent in 2015.

Syrian women who did not come to Europe are left behind to fend for themselves and their children. Syrian women complain about their abandonment while Syrian men stay in Germany.

In 2015, 73% of the migrants were males, resulting in a gender imbalance in Europe often leading to rape by “men of foreign origin.”Although Islam forbids the drinking of alcohol, many Muslim refugees are seen walking around railroad stations with bottles of liquor.Religiously sanctioned gender discrimination is the new norm in Europe.