Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Angelo Silent As Anti-Police Myths Unravel

Blue Voice Candidate For President Kevin Graham Vows To Take Up Evidence Of False Allegations Against Police...

Saying
that the criminal justice system itself is on trial and that he “can’t imagine
a more important criminal case,” a federal Magistrate Judge ruled last week
that a vast body of evidence detailing the controversial investigative tactics
of wrongful conviction activists must be turned over.

The
ruling by Judge David Weisman came in the lawsuit by Alstory Simon against
Northwestern University, a former professor at the school, and a private investigator.
Simon is suing all three, claiming he was coerced in 1999 into confessing to a
1982 double murder as part of a plan by Northwestern investigators to exonerate
Anthony Porter from death row.

Simon
was released from prison in 2014 by Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez
after a year-long review of his conviction. Alvarez assailed the conduct of
Protess and Ciolino when she released Simon.

Porter’s
release in 1999 paved the way for a litany of other exonerations from death
row.

Now
Simon’s federal lawsuit is challenging the thirty-year mythology about wrongful
convictions and the claims of police misconduct. Simon’s lawsuit alleges a
pattern of misconduct against former professor David Protess and private
investigator Paul Ciolino spanning many cases over a long period of time.

Judge
Weisman granted the vast majority of Simon’s demands for evidence in the case.

Despite
Judge Weismann’s statement about the magnitude of Simon’s lawsuit and his
decision to compel defendants to fork over so much evidence, there was not one
single Chicago journalist attending the hearing. Nor has any media outlet
announced it since.

Tribune
“journalists” Steve Mills, Jeremy Gorner, and Dave Heinzmann were not there,
nor was Sun Times reporter Frank Main. Columnists like Eric Zorn couldn’t be
found. Not even John Kass.

How
ironic.

The
slightest whisper of an allegation by the Department of Justice alleging police
misconduct is echoed by the Chicago media in a kind of hysteria. It is cited in
almost every article about the police thereafter with some caveat about a
“pattern” of police misconduct. But a case in the federal courts contradicting
the anti-police mythology of Chicago’s activist media­­—even one a judge says
puts the entire criminal justice system on trial—can’t even generate a stringer
reporter working part time.

It’s
no mystery. Alstory Simon’s claims about being framed for a double murder also
puts the Chicago media on trial, a trial the media clearly does not want to
face. If Simon prevails in his lawsuit, how will the newspapers explain their
conduct, their failure to adequately investigate his case and others?

Here’s
a question none of the media want to face: If they got the Anthony Porter
exoneration wrong, how many others did they get wrong? So the media simply
ignores the story.

Talk
about a “code of silence.”

But
for how long can they do so?

In
the hearing, it was discussed that attorneys may even depose the prosecutor,
Dick Devine, who released Porter from custody and convicted Simon in 1999.

A
former prosecutor deposed in a case that asserts a conspiracy in the wrongful
conviction movement? That isn’t newsworthy to Chicago’s activist media?

But
the Simon lawsuit—and the evidence it may reveal—poses a giant burden to the
FOP under Dean Angelo as well. The reason is that Angelo has been confronted
with the evidence time and again that FOP members, current and retired, have
been falsely accused. Yet Angelo has done nothing with the evidence, either
with the media, the political establishment, or as legal strategy.

One
would think that such evidence for a FOP president was a gift from heaven, a
powerful tool to combat the incessant media hype vilifying his members.

But
not for Angelo. Throughout the three years of his administration, Angelo let
the media attack his members over and over as he ignored the evidence that
these attacks are baseless.

In
contrast, Blue Voice presidential candidate Kevin Graham has made fighting the
corrupt media and their false allegations a top priority of his administration,
taking on Preib as candidate for vice president on his slate.

Three
more years of an administration that stands on the sidelines while the members
get burned, or a new administration that will dig for the facts speak out for
the members?