Seriously? On what grounds are you basing this? That's just unsubstantiated guess work.

The evidence we have to go off is that several women have complained about Brian Wood's actions. The contrasting evidence is that when reached for comment, Wood has declined to say anything. Judging by the people who are taking his side in this thread even without any comment or defense from him, I sincerely doubt what you fear is true.

Again that is not the point. It isn't about taking sides. It is about the fact that some poster that I replied to said they thought that Wood should step up and comment and the reality is is that that there isn't any point in doing that because no one (hyperbole for those that need it to be explicitly stated) would believe him. I'm not inclined to believe some peoples allegations against someone else without proof and I don't consider other people to be a good testimony but even that is not the point and entirely irrelevant

regardless of the number of people who would "believe him", saying something is the right thing to do. if you have a pattern of behavior that makes people who interact with you feel shitty, they deserve an apology. thats normal human being shit. whether it be something like "im sorry, i'm im trying not to be that person anymore" or "i was drinking that night, and i apologize if i got belligerent and rude" or even a personal private message to these people he should do something. him sitting there quietly hoping it all goes away makes him look worse than any public statement could, in my opinion.

Unless of course he didn't do anything in which case he really shouldn't have to do anything. I'm not saying he did or he didn't but the suggestions you give all imply guilt. But say he didn't which for all we know he might not have, would you expect him to apologize anyway or would be ok with him not responding.