Martinv commented on Martinv's post: @Binchan: and what about for someone who only has the new file? Say a new ZN user, or someone who has alreaady received the update.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: @Binchan: Does that mean that once a newer version of a page or post is signed and distributed, there is *no way* to get an older version? I'm not saying only "officially".

Martinv commented on ScrubTheSecond's post: Something similar is happening everywhere else. People making laws about something they don't even understand, or even bother to try to understand. They open their mouths only to be publicly humiliated.

Martinv commented on Journalist's post: @Nekololi: not even that. I'm sure there's already many forks and clones of the ZeroNet repository and anyone could continue it's development, and even if that is not the case, all the clients today would still keep running and creating new content.
Once it's out there, there is no going back. The only possible death to networks like ZeroNet is if *ALL* the clients go offline, and I'm afraid that is not very plausible to happen anytime soon.

Martinv commented on Journalist's post: I think you don't fully understand how ZeroNet, censorship or the Human Race works.

Martinv commented on Journalist's post: I understand and share your concern. Yet I believe that we are facing a change in the rules of the game that we are not going to be able to stop.
Anonimity, uncensorability and descentralized networks are here and they are never going away. Instead of trying to apply the same reasoning and rules of the "clear web" to networks like ZeroNet (there are others too) is just nonsensical. I agree and welcome this debate. I think we need to talk about this, but also we need to understand that evils like pedophilia exist in the real world and exist in the clear web too. In the clear web we have some ways of tracking and taking down that content, but at the same time those same tools are used every day to censor and persecute innocent people for political or economic reasons, so there is no perfect solution.
Like they say in the Philosophy of Freenet page, for a democracy to be healthy, you need free speech, and to have free speech you need to have a place where people can be anonymous and where what they say cannot be censored. There is no good censorship. Censorship has always *somebody* who determines what is good and bad, and it can always be misused.
I am interested to see how ZeroNet and other networks of the kind evolve and face this problems. I don't have the answer, but I know for sure that in the end we will strike some balance.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: @Rebelb0y11: I CAN comment on other people's posts, but not in all of them, as you can see. I think that means some problem with hubs, as your solution suggests. I might give that a try if I keep having this problem.

Martinv commented on Rebelb0y11's post: @Rebelb0y11: what I mean is that you shouldn't be able to make that kind of mistakes. I'm sure it will be something to be improved in the next releases, of course.

Martinv commented on Dogman's post: @Dogman: In my country there is at least one place where people have made this (but with a gateway to access the Internet too).
It's in spanish, but you might find it interesting, try Google Translator:
http://docs.altermundi.net/RedesMiniMaxi

Martinv commented on Dogman's post: @Rebelb0y11: this is why it attracts all kinds of content that would be censored more easily by third parties in other types of networks, but it doesn't mean we can't have everything else too.

Martinv commented on Dogman's post: This is not a problem with Zeronet necesarily. You only need to find or create a zite that has moderation of some kind. What I mean is you CAN have a p2p network like the one you are talking about.

Martinv commented on Dogman's post: Private keys are going to replace username and passwords stored on a centralized server in many cases, like in ZN.

Martinv commented on Mynameislegion's post: Privacytools is also on ZeroNet: http://192.168.1.111:43110/14gSEpfWfF5Go7u5y7UidZQCnGa6eSBYZ9/

Martinv commented on Dergatt's post: @Dergatt: I remember being an app that basically took a snapshot of the whole system. I think it was called something like Nandroid Backup, maybe you want to take a look a that.

Martinv commented on Dergatt's post: @Rythyrix: that's correct. What I meant is, if you take the time to root your device, also know that you have to take some time to learn what you need to know in order to keep it safe.

Martinv commented on Dergatt's post: @Rythyrix: well... I don't know if I would say it's better to have it and not use it. If you get infected with malware on a rooted device the compromise is actually bigger. With great control comes great responsibility (?).

Martinv commented on Dergatt's post: I recommend rooting because it allows you to install a system-wide ad blocker, use a firewall to allow or block traffic for any app, including system apps, remove bloatware or junk apps that come with most stock roms, use Tor system wide and route all traffic through there.
tl;dr: It gives you more control over your own device.

Martinv commented on ks's post: I've found this to be the clearest explanation out there about all this WhatsApp bug/feature debacle:
Security Now Podcast - What's up with WhatsApp:
https://twit.tv/shows/security-now/episodes/595?autostart=false

Martinv commented on Firebox's post: I think the distorted voice was a strategy just for effect...

Martinv commented on Feeblemind's post: Well, some things have changed. More new people every day, many collaborators, people asking for features, *some* original content, but not much, and now, a few spambots, which I translate like ZN is starting to get atention.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: @Eibriel: thanks, that sounds ok, but I'm too old for this shit.
Yet I can wait for an "official" fix or feature. In the meantime I can wear my anti-troll armor and kick some spambot's ass ;)
Maybe @durand might be interested in that piece of code...

Martinv commented on Nofish's post: @Zit: well that is really bad advice, no matter the context.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: @Durand: I don't know. What to some people is spam for others might not. People might just tag anything they don't like as spam, just like a downvote button and so on. My point is, make it optional, and don't try to decide what's good or bad for the user, let the users decide themselves, and let them also choose if they want to do it manually or want an algorythm do it for them.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: @Durand: Yeah, maybe, but then the criteria on which that spam identifiers decide what is spam and what is not gets a little tricky. I think both solutions would be useful if everyone has the option to use one or the other or both.

Martinv commented on Zanity's post: I only noticed that if I access remotely to the ZN in my main computer I have a diferent set of favorites. So each client has it's own local version of that favs list, or something like that.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: @Emeraude: About the malware part, ZN will make almost impossible to stop the spreading of such malware. It's so easy to click on a ZN link, leave, and forget that now you are a peer that is also hosting and spreading that Zite.
And about the blacklisting of users, I really miss that from ZeroMePlus. Some blocking feature should be available on every main ZN site. Some people say what's the point in having "censorship" in ZeroNet, and my answer is NOT to swallow any kind of shit anyone throws out there. It's not censorship, it's just a personal customization. A place where no one can choose what not to see is a heaven for spam and advertizers > shit content.

Martinv commented on Brahman's post: This has been happening for a while, but 2016 was a really shitty year for security. On the other hand, I think 2017 is going to be the year of "let's start caring for security". It doesn't mean it's going to be enough. Probably it's going to be a lot of PR and publicity, but in the end some things are gonna stick.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: @Ekodjtal: Yeah, that's kind of close, but I meant more like literally a clone, with upvote, downvote of posts and comments, and actual 'ZubReddits' (see what I did there ;) ?)

Martinv commented on Durand's post: I just think is great that this kind of mind exercises are made. We need to be one step ahead in order to respond when the time comes instead of happily clickity clicking anything.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: @Durand: I actually WAS expecting that to happen around that time, only that I had to leave for an hour, and when I came back all hell was loose. With Bitcoin you have to ve watching ALL THE TIME because it is still very unstable. Unstable is great for trading, but you can't take your eyes out for a minute...

Martinv commented on Flyman's post: I asked this recently and nofish gave me the answer:
http://127.0.0.1:43110/Me.ZeroNetwork.bit/?Post/1oranGeS2xsKZ4jVsu9SVttzgkYXu4k9v/18cSYDgTfMB255SDgQM9EuoyWu78MhWfNj/1481738544

Martinv commented on ks's post: @ks: in that case you should not expose any ports, or filter all IPs excepts the ones you are using (your office or whatever).
This is the world now.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: It's about the Stuxnet worm, but the trailer smelled a little too like fear mongering. Not that it's a very serious issue, don't get me wrong, but the way it was portrayed in the trailer seemed a little anoying. Maybe because I'm more interested in the technical details and consequences, and not in all the WELCOME TO THE COLD WAR 2.0 stuff.
I'll lgive it a try...

Martinv commented on Greatsick's post: I see it as a kind of linkedin for developers. Having your repos up there and showing how active you are, what languages you are fluid in, projects you created or you contribute to... all that is kind of a resume.

Martinv commented on Bwoi's post: You are messing with my head. Did you change the owner of the post or something's broken...? In the recent activity I can see that at first it was "Bwoi's post" and now is "Alex's post"...

Martinv commented on Bwoi's post: Whichcraft! I swear I WAS seeing you as Bwoi but now you're Alex and I see a (regular) link. :D

Martinv commented on Arkre's post: Well, there are better words to explain the idea without being plain nonsense...

Martinv commented on Bwoi's post: You can add other features that make your site unique. You don't even have a link to bwoi in your own profile, so I have to go get it from somewhere. There are things you can do to keep the project alive, but again, if you just don't want to, don't waste your time, you don't have a contract with your users.

Martinv commented on Bwoi's post: You do what you like, of course. I'm just saying IT IS GOOD TO HAVE ALTERNATIVES. At least I like to have them.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: Well, in my case I got the response from Echobot, but I keep getting the response in my inbox even if I delete it many times. I guess the deletion is not updating...

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: Ok. I created my blog very recently. I guess when new features are added nofish will explain how to make the update.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: Signal has a chrome extension that works as a desktop client, but it needs a phone in order to verify your identity in SOME way. It's private, not anonymous.
About Telegram, yeah, it's convenient, but actually, since Whatsapp now encrypts the messages using the Signal protocol, it's actually safer than Telegram. Telegram created it's own encryption, which is bad bad bad.
Tox and Ricochet are ok, only that nobody uses it and are a little harder to use than Signal.

Martinv commented on Th3B3st's post: Is port 15441 opened? Maybe you need to manually redirect that port on your router to the machine running ZN.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: @Th3B3st you need to enable a plugin in the server that adds a password to the dashboard, and then you can access it from another computer on the same LAN or even over the Internet if configured properly.
[FAQ Zeronet](http://zeronet.readthedocs.io/en/latest/faq/)

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: Yeah, that's what I thought. Anyway, I'll be running the server on a single machine and then use it remotely enabling the UI password plugin, and problem solved (right?)

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: 1. I do now...
2. I am actually using ZeroMePlus, and still see a blocked user everywhere, that's why I posted this.
UPDATE: 2. I had to check "Mute Blacklist", now it's working :D

Martinv commented on Hexagon's post: You should listen to the last couple of episodes of Security Now, where they explain how it works and the security flaws it has by design and by lack of design.
https://twit.tv/shows/security-now

Martinv commented on Flyman's post: Here's the link about using git on ZN: http://127.0.0.1:43110/1xxooZ7s8iDz3u56i5mNQ1XGmwF8Zvnw9/

Martinv commented on Flyman's post: Yup, that's what I did. It used to be a pain in the ass but now is very simple. Just clone, edit and publish. The only thing that is still "manual" is changing the avatar. You have to change the avatar.png file in the img folder of your cloned ZeroBlog.

Martinv commented on Flyman's post: I think ZeroBlog is suited for that task. If you are interested in documenting the individual changes, I have seen somewhere that you can use github with ZeroNet, but I'm not really sure how that would work.

Martinv commented on Martinv's post: I didn't think anyone would read this, ehm, "tweet" :D
I guess its easier to have visibility in ZeroNet than I initially thaught, which I find very interesting and encouraging.

a vigorously lazy deadbeat with matured immaturity
**Zites**
[SetupList](/setuplist.0web.bit)
**Clearnet**
[mmap.page](https://mmap.page)
**License**
Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute all my posts and comments at ZeroMe for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted.