Microsoft has its work cut out thanks to its entry into a tablet arena revived by Apple's iPad, according to analysts. Just as the company approaches the finish line clutching Windows 8 for fondleslabs, panting away like Steve Ballmer at a developer conference, punters have already lost interest.
Forrester Research has …

COMMENTS

Actually microsoft were pretty much first movers on tablets, having sold them for years. It's just that they were first, but got it wrong.

Now they have to bounce back with a 2nd attempt, much like they've done with windows phone 7 (they were well 'ahead' of apple on phones too, remember). Well, they didn't exactly 'bounce' so much as 'flop' there, but I think they did do a lot right and might end up rebounding yet. Windows 8 though, I think they've not got nearly so right.

Bill G couldn't see the forest for the trees...

... or something like that.

He had vision for tablets, so in some way he saw a glimpse of the future, but he was looking at it through tinted Windows... he wasn't visionary or daring enough to risk his cash cow or significantly alter it, to work with a touchscreen. Ergo the touchscreen became a bolt-on, not the main driver of their desktop evolution.

Just consider the Courier (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/01/the_death_of_the_courier/). Here Steve Ballmer proved, more than ever before, he just never was CEO material. He bottled the decision, deferring to Gates, who killed it because he wouldn't be able to shoe-horn Outlook on there.

What a missed opportunity... between them that decision should have caused both Ball-less Ballmer and Open-Goal Gates a few sleepless nights filled with regret over the last few years.

Still, if it wasn't for them dropping the ball we wouldn't have Android, so I hope he stays on as CEO and continues to drive MS deeper into the quagmire until it chokes on it's own vomit.

Maybe BUT...

Maybe Microsoft was late to the game but there is a ton of game left. I and 100 million others need a pad that will work seemless with out Windows PC like yesterday. I need it fast, video and wifi ready. Nice tuch screen transition etc.

I think the vast practical people of the PC world is waiting for someone to do all that right.

I do not want a tablet that I cannot get from A to Z in my already full integrated PC life.

You could say bye-bye to MS if Apple were to

enable input with a sytlus (for taking signatures).

Where I work, the only reason to use Windows Tablets is for Handwriting/signatures. The field sales force could then complete the sale AND get the customer to sign on the dotted line instead of having do that later. They love their iPad apps. The interface knocks anything they had on Windoze into the proverbial cocked hat yet there is a plan to replace all those iPads with Dell Tablets running Windows just because of the signature.

capacitive styluses

Sigh...

Did anyone bother to check the "research"? No? That figures... The forrester data was grossly skewed. They did one survey, then recontacted those same people at a later time. Almost 1/3 of those people didn't respond to the second survey, plus the number of people who "didn't know what an OS was" grew. It was previously such a minuscule number that even a percentage couldn't be shown, and now suddenly it grew 2%? Statistics don't lie, unless of course they the way those statistics were gathered was completely wrong.

And to back up my legacy app comment...

I think I would like a Windows 8 tablet

I work for a school system and all the teachers want are tablets. Providing every teacher with an iPad would be a network management nightmare. We have a bunch of iPad's for a Special Education program and each one has to managed individually. They were purchased without consent from the technology department, but we now have to manage them.

I am hoping and I am sure this will happen, that a Windows 8 tablet can be joined to a domain and controlled via group policy. We could then roll out tablet devices extremely easily for all our staff.

This is where Microsoft can win and are winning in the business sector. The iPad will probably continue to be the main player in the consumer end, but in the business market I see only one winner and that's Microsoft unless Apple get their game face on and provide admins with better controls for a network.

I believe Microsoft will overtake Android though in the consumer end and will be number 2 in the tablet market. There just seems something missing with the Android platform.

@gerryG

Kind of Amusing

Having played around with the Win 8 Dev Preview (on a non-touch-based laptop) I'll say that Microsoft still has some major work to do on unifying the user experience between Metro and the trad desktop UI. However, it is amusing that when Apple takes its time to get something right nobody does any handwringing. If Microsoft does, then they're too late to the party. As much as I'd like to have seen Win8 out by now, I'd rather they get it right than rush to market. Honeycomb, anyone?

as pointed out

MS has actually beat Apple to the mark in almost all areas, with the exception of the more recent iPod. MSs problem as been three fold, firstly its marketing sucks so bad its unreal, really someone needs to be shot, with teh amount of money MS is sitting on they could have setup their own television network, let alone an advert every nth tv break.

The second issue is around being lazy, they make something good way ahead of anyone else and leave it until its too late, i mean win mo was essentially killed off by the networks and OEMs, at the time MS only made available core OS, OEMS didnt buy drivers and networks filled it full of crap, so much so that it either made it slow, unstable or unrecognisable, but again, they left it way to late to develope it.

the last thing is Ballmer, i mean come on, i admit im not keen on Apple gear but damn, how many times can MS get kicked in the balls by apple?! MS under that guy is constantely reacting and in some cases that works great, but seriously, think man! Billy boy was no saint but least it had some balls about him, a vision if you will.

You forgot

MS has not beaten anyone, to anything, in any area, ever... EXCEPT to a partnership with OEMs in the mid/late 80's, which allowed them to gain a dominant position, which they subsequently abused to kill off any competition... that's a fact...proven IN COURT.

Microsoft doesn't have ONE single product that they invented themselves.

Their problem with the tablet is that as someone else posted, there is no tablet market... there's only an iPad market.

How big is the tablet market really?

Re: How big?

ShelLuser - About 2 million units a month in the summer for iPad. Probably 2.5 million per month or 3 this quarter. With profits about $280 per unit including accessories and whatnot, about $700M per month in net profits for Apple. It's not bad for a new product, but it's no iPhone.

Android's probably approaching those sell-through numbers now, but it will never be reported because it's mostly cheap knock-on tablets sold into parts of the world that don't have our compulsive counting fetish, made by people who change their names as often as they buy shoes. Margins are low presumably, but not so low as cheap consumer laptops.

IDC says that for 2011 tablet sales will be 15% the size of the PC market. But tablets didn't really start hitting their stride until summer. Maybe next year 25-30%. Year-on-year growth is difficult to gauge when it's ramping at this scale.

Meanwhile, PC sales are flat.

Nobody's going to buy Windows on a tablet or a phone. Look at your Windows desktop PC. Now look at an iPhone, iPad, Android phone or tablet. Which is instant on, fluidly responsive, and a joy to use? Which one is "cool?" That's why. We're going mobile and Microsoft isn't coming with us.

The problem here...

The problem here is that in order to get into the tablet market, Microsoft will have to come up with some innovations of their own. And that would certainly be a first for them.

The bar for quality, stability, ease of use and overall functionality has been set pretty high by Apple. If all Microsoft can do is come close to that... they've already failed. Just like the problem with Google+ was that everyone was already on facebook, the problem with a Windows tablet is going to be that... well it's okay but it's not an iPad.

In order to succeed, Microsoft will have to do to the iPad, what Apple did to the tablet PC. And personally, I do not believe Microsoft is capable of such a leap. They do not have to company culture.

"Forrester Research has published a report that claims consumer interest has "plummeted" during the past nine months. The bean counters are vague on what the tab-happy public has grown tired of - be it Windows 8, tablets, or tablets running Window 8 - but the conclusion is that Microsoft's got a hard act to follow."

----

Absolutely it has plummeted.

For some history on Windows. So, Windows 1.x-3.x, then 95, 98, ME have a common lineage. NT was basically from scratch, and started with NT 3.1. Between NT 3.1 and 4.0, it supported (besides x86) MIPS, Alpha, and PowerPC. The Alpha version even had an x86->Alpha translator supplied by DEC.

Given this historical context, I read talk months ago about Windows 8 for ARM being targetted even for ARM-based netbooks, and people filling in the blanks assumed an x86->ARM translation thing, and so x86-like experience but on an ARM (with performance and battery life getting better as more ARM native apps come out.) Porting an x86 app for ARM would have been a recompile (plus taking care of any inline assembly.. which hopefully should just be a snippet of MMX or 3DNow... most ARMs have a SIMD instruction set called NEON that should be applicable to keeping the ARM version fast.) Of course for code that was already "managed code", this shouldn't even need the recompile.

Now? Windows 8 for x86 is supposed to have it's own interface, AND a second one that is Windows 8 for arm like. The ARM one looks like Windows phone 7, but instead of even using .NET or anything it's supposed to use HTML5, Javascript, and CSS.

How's that for a loss of enthusiasm? Going from visions of a pain-free transition from x86 to ARM, to "Well, actually it runs web apps" loses any enthusiasm I had for it. And retreating to tablets.

(Side note, my enthusiasm was actually pretty minimal, I'm excited about something like an ARM netbook, and even an ARM desktop, but running Linux. I've actually run either Debian or Ubuntu on PA-RISC, UltraSPARC, PowerPC, and Alpha besides the usual x86. The user experience is identical. A few years ago, I went on vacation for a few weeks. Some of the guys where I worked actually backed up the home directory and data off my Ubuntu for x86 system, pulled a board out of a PowerMac (dual 800mhz or so) and stuck it into a duplicate of my computer's case, and even used a PS/2->USB adapter so the same Model M keyboard was plugged in. They made sure it was already running when I got back, and took bets on how long it'd take me to realize it was a Mac -- about 4 hours, I finally rebooted it and heard that Mac startup sound. I kept using it for quite a while -- there was really no reason not to. This is what I want out of an ARM system -- the same stuff I do now, but with better power consumption (longer battery life on netbook and smaller power bill for desktop.)