Neurostimulation of Spinal Nerves That Affect the Heart (Neurostim)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government.
Read our disclaimer for details.

The purpose of this study is to study the use of neurostimulation in chronic advanced refractory heart failure.

The study is determine if it is safe to use neurostimulation in patients with chronic advanced refractory heart failure and to also determine initial observations with regards to its potential effect on heart function and quality of life. The investigators hypothesis is that this study will show both safe and positive effect of neurostimulation on heart failure patients.

Title EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY OF NEUROSTIMULATION IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC HEART FAILURE FEASIBILTIY STUDY

Description A feasibility trial of the use of neurostimulation in chronic advanced refractory heart failure.

Objective To determine the safety of neurostimulation in patients with chronic advanced refractory heart failure and to generate initial observations with regards to its potential effect on ventricular function and quality of life.

Design The trial will be a randomized double blind crossover feasibility trial with 2 week and 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 month clinical follow-up.

After device implantation, patients enrolled in the trial will have been randomly assigned to have device programmed to deliver impulses, active, or to have the device programmed not to deliver impulses, inactive, for 3 months.

After the 3 month initial phase, the devices will be inactivated and a 4 week washout period will convene.

At the end of washout period, patients that were inactive during initial phase will crossover to active and similarly patients that were active during initial phase will crossover to inactive.

Patient Population Patients with non-ischemic or ischemic cardiomyopathy with a length of illness of at least 6 months who have met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Enrollment Enrollment of a total of 10 intent-to-treat patients Investigational Sites Up to 2 investigational sites in the US Data Collection Data collection will be obtained in three categories: markers of cardiovascular safety, markers of device-device interactions and markers of efficacy.

Markers of cardiovascular safety will include specific clinical events that define worsening of heart failure including hospitalization for worsening heart failure, symptomatic brady-arrhythmia or tachy-arrhythmia necessitating cardioversion or death.

Markers of device-device interaction [ Time Frame: 2 years ]

Markers of device-device interaction will include failure to properly provide pacing or adequate defibrillation or inappropriate shocks. Also, failure to initiate neurostimluation as programmed by the protocol

Markers of efficacy [ Time Frame: Average: till the end of the study ]

Markers of efficacy will include change in left ventricular ejection fraction as determined by echocardiography, change in maximal oxygen consumption as measured by cardio-pulmonary exercise testing, and change in quality of life as measured by the MLHFQ. Other exploratory markers include measurements in diastolic function by echocardiography, changes in neurohormonal and inflammatory markers, specifically BNP, plasma cytokines(TNF alpha and IL 6), complement, and C-reactive protein.

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

No changes in active cardiac medications during the 1 week prior to treatment;

Written informed consent.

Patients with current or prior symptoms of heart failure and reduced LVEF should be on stable optimally uptitrated medical therapy recommended according to current guidelines (Circulation. 2005; 112 (12): e154) as standard of care for heart failure therapy in the United States. This minimally includes an ACE-inhibitor (ACE-I) at stable doses for 1 month prior to enrollment, if tolerated, and a beta blocker (carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, or bisoprolol) for 3 months prior to enrollment, if tolerated, with a stable up-titrated dose for 1 month prior to enrollment. This also includes an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) at stable doses for 1 month prior to enrollment, if tolerated, when ACE-I is not tolerated. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or a 50% decrease in dose. If the patient is intolerant to ACE-I, ARB, or beta blockers, documented evidence must be available. In those intolerant to both ACE-I and ARB, combination therapy with hydralazine and oral nitrate should be considered. Therapeutic equivalence for ACE-I substitutions is allowed within the enrollment stability timelines. Aldosterone inhibitor therapy should be added when NYHA Class III or IV symptoms occur on standard therapy. If aldosterone inhibitor therapy is administered in Class II patients, it must be initiated and optimized prior to enrollment. Eplerenone requires dosage stability for 1 month prior to enrollment. Diuretics may be used as necessary to keep the patient euvolemic.

Patient is pregnant, of childbearing potential and not using adequate contraceptive methods, or nursing.;

Patient scheduled for hospice care;

Any other medical, social or geographical factor, which would make it unlikely that the patient will comply with study procedures (eg. Alcohol abuse, lack of permanent residence, severe depression, disorientation, distant location and a history of non-compliance).