Transvaginal Mesh MDL Court Denies Boston Scientific Request

In the Boston Scientific transvaginal mesh multidistrict litigation (MDL) taking place in a federal court in West Virginia, the transvaginal mesh manufacturer submitted a request to try cases individually versus as a group. Boston Scientific requested a Motion to Sever and Conduct Individual Trials.

In this particular case, Motion to Sever means that Boston Scientific sought to separate the grouped cases so that each could be tried individually.

Boston Scientific submitted their request on August 11, 2014, and the presiding judge, Judge Joseph R. Goodwin, ruled against granting their motion a week later on August 18.

Elaborating on his ruling, Judge Goodwin stated that he was left unconvinced by Boston Scientific’s reasons for pursuing separate trials. Specifically, the judge did not feel that trying a group of cases in one trial would, as identified by Boston Scientific in their request, present the transvaginal mesh manufacturer with impossible legal obstacles and prejudice.

The decision to keep the cases grouped is in keeping with an MDL being the choice method of efficiently hearing a large number of similar cases.

The Defective Medical Device Lawyers at Carey Danis & Lowe

A St. Louis law firm practicing defective medical device litigation, Carey Danis & Lowe represents women across the country in transvaginal mesh lawsuits. Our team of experienced trial lawyers and medical professionals understand the emotional and physical suffering that comes with the use of a defective medical product, such as transvaginal mesh.

We work hard to hold accountable those companies behind defective products.

If you or someone you love has been injured by Boston Scientific transvaginal mesh, or mesh manufactured by another maker, Carey Danis & Lowe would like to walk you through your legal options and compensation eligibility during a free case evaluation.