Voter Registration and Official Election InformationVoter Registration in Louisiana is now closed. You can register before November 10 to vote in the December 10 run-off.
If you are
registered and don’t care, please find someone who is currently
incarcerated or on parole but wants their opinions heard. You can vote for their interests.

Early Voting is a great
option if you’re the type to forget, or if you hate lines, or if the
pressure of voting within one specific day is ultimately too much. Early
voting is a whole week, and you can go in-and-out without a wait time.

For some back story, these guides have been produced lovingly and carefully since 2014 by a group of individuals who wish to confront the existing lack of accountability in the branches of Louisiana government, and in the election process more generally. We did a lot of research and talked with our neighbors, friends, and allies. We tried to cut through the opaque language of the Constitutional amendments so people feel more comfortable and knowledgeable about voting either way (or not voting). We agreed on the following guidelines to make — or in some cases, decline to make—our recommendations:

•Promote justice and advancement for people of color, poor people, queer people, immigrants, youth, people most affected by environmental degradation, and other marginalized populations in our communities; prioritize the needs of these people above others.

•Favor the judicial candidates least destructive to the lives of the poor and others caught in the dragnet of our punitive legal system.

•Be strategic about New Orleanians' specific needs being adequately addressed on the state and federal levels, especially with regard to environmental, economic, and healthcare concerns.

•Reject the influence of post-Katrina opportunism at all levels of government.

We approach this work with a harm reduction ethos—that is, we understand we cannot easily nor quickly move the mountains of inequality, prejudice, (bureaucracy!), and oppression that keep people down. We considered the view that deliberating on “Who is going to harm us?” is actually not a form of harm reduction at all. Ultimately, we believe we can work to ease the suffering and trauma that exist in our communities. In this way, we advance towards a visionary society in which everyone's needs are met, and our values are reflected in our system of governance.

These guides start as working drafts, so expect updates as we continue to do research. Feel free to submit your contributions!

***

On November 8, Louisianans vote for a new president, choose among 24 candidates to replace Senator David Vitter, select from numerous candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives, and decide on six amendments to the Constitution of the State of Louisiana. Then there's local elections: New Orleanians choose two judges and decide on one parishwide proposition; some of us are choosing members for the Orleans Parish School Board.

Let’s be real: The two main candidates are going to be on the spectrum of destructive-to-nightmarish for Louisiana, the country, and geopolitics at large. To everyone who feels like there isn't really a choice in this election, there are actually 13 people running for president who made it to the Louisiana ballot this year. Maybe you've heard of Jill Stein (Green Party) or Gary Johnson (Libertarian); maybe you haven't. Maybe you're a diehard Socialist Workers Party member, bless your heart.

The point is, the obscene amounts of money involved in this election—as well as the entrenched Party machinery in collusion with the mainstream media—keep people from knowing that there are options other than the big D or R. So-called pundits will tell you that Louisiana is already bought and sold as a "Red State," which means you have the opportunity to register your objection to this nonsense by voting for a non-Red candidate, or not voting at all.

Don’t let people shame you into voting for Hillary just because she has lady parts. I tried voting with my vagina one time, and they threw me out of the polling location. True, she might let you get an abortion, but she’s also responsible for violence against women around the world in the form of war, coups, the War on Drugs, and detainment of immigrants. Our struggles are related, friends. She would be less awful than Trump in many ways, but that’s not very inspiring. Personally, I want a dyke for president.

We encourage voters to focus their political passion on the more local elections, which offer a greater opportunity to get your voice heard.

Labor Day is the traditional kick-off of campaign season, but in Louisiana, candidates and voters were thinking about something else entirely: the recent Louisiana floods. This is actually a great time to remind the country that the Gulf Coast is the canary in the climate change coal mine. Remember us down here? We’re suffering because of the predatory oil and gas industry, decades of indifferent and opportunistic politicians, degraded infrastructure, and brutally underfunded social services like education, workforce development, healthcare, and housing. We need political representatives who understand the threats to our well-being and will work doggedly to protect us, investing in the sustainability of our communities.

Meanwhile, only one of our major candidates (Foster Campbell, endorsed by the Sierra Club's Delta Chapter) for U.S. Senate admits he believes—because the Pope said so—that global warming is a real threat caused by human activity. We’ll let the others speak for themselves:

Caroline Fayard: “I’m not a scientist"* Troy Hebert: “I’m not a scientist.”John Fleming (who is a physician and should know more about science): “It’s very unscientific to say we had a big rain so it was caused by global warming.”John Kennedy: “Global temperatures are rising but the evidence does not clearly explain why."Rob Maness: "Humans are partly responsible for warming temperatures but it doesn’t represent a major threat."Charles Boustany: "Pushing the narrative that climate change caused the flooding in Louisiana has significant flaws.”David Duke: Actually, we don’t care what he has to say.

OMG, y’all need to SIT DOWN.

*Updated position platform from Caroline Fayard: "Anthropogenic climate change is perhaps the number one challenge facing the future of Louisiana." Okay, then! Fayard ultra-recently released a three-page plan to fight climate change and coastal erosion throughout Louisiana. Though she opposes suing oil companies- largely because she's in their pocket - she is the only Senate candidate with a written public plan to address climate change. Is this person for actual environmental justice, or opportunistic privatization of the public sector? It's hard to tell here. She is endorsed by the Landrieus, if that gives you any idea of her commitment to The People.

On another note, U.S. senators play an essential role in the nomination and selection of judges for federal court benches, including the Supreme Court. However, our current lineup of senators—prime example, outgoing Sen. David Vitter—have not been doing their job, leaving many vacancies unfilled for years. This has prevented initiatives to racially diversify the Judiciary, as two Latino judges nominated by President Obama (Dax Lopez and Gonzalo Curiel) have been blocked by the inaction in the Senate. In the lower courts alone, more than 70,000 cases have been missed, creating a judicial logjam. We need to elect senators who are committed to getting our judicial vacancies filled in a timely fashion. In other words, #DoYourJob.

Speaking of politicians in the pocket of oil and gas, incumbent Scalise says FRACKING is safe. For those of you in the dark, suffice it to say that fracking will probably end the world as we know it. Scalise occupies the dangerous territory of Congress known as U.S. House Majority Whip, which means that this guy, who has referred to his politics as “David Duke without the baggage,” threatens members of the GOP to stay in line with his anti-environment, anti-people, pro-corporate agenda. But Scalise has a million dollars to spend on his campaign, and his challengers have neither money to spend nor plans to win.

VOTE: Wait and see who poses the most credible threat to Scalise’s re-election. Dugas or Barron are our top contenders.

After Holden’s negligent behavior all summer long, it's a joke to see him on the ballot. This is the man who “left to go eat a Kip Burger” after surveying the flooding damage earlier in the summer, and claimed, “I’m not a showboat politician” upon being asked for comment on the police murder of Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge. Re-electing Cedric Richmond is to the benefit of Southeastern Louisiana: Richmond is empowered by the House's Democratic whip and a bipartisan congressional working group on law enforcement and community relations. Richmond showed up for reals this summer, as a speaker at the ceremony to celebrate the life of Alton Sterling.VOTE: We’re with Cedric Richmond, incumbent.Suggested resource: Live on Facebook with Cedric Richmond, Kip Holden, and Kenneth Cutno Part 1 and Part Two, short videos on The New Orleans Tribune Facebook Page, September-October, 2016.

Bartholomew-Woods is Civil Court judge, darling of local Democrats and labor organizations with endorsements up the wazoo, and the pick of D.A. Leon Cannizzaro, who applauds her “judicial demeanor.” FYI, possible conflict of interest for endorsements: Her hubbie holds one of the city’s largest contracts as owner of Metro Disposal Inc. Overall, she’s well-rounded and well-connected.

White is Chief Judge of Criminal Court, a frequent adversary of Cannizzaro - he does not evaluate her “judicial demeanor” positively - and kind of a rock star! Here are a couple of Louisiana firsts she is responsible for: White served as co-counsel to the New York Innocence Project in the first exoneration case based on DNA science. She launched a recidivism prevention program for people re-entering society from prisons. She and other judges order nonviolent offenders with relatively short sentences to earn their GEDs and attend “life skills” classes under the mentorship of older inmates at Angola.

Frank Marullo, the longest-running judge in Louisiana with the worst ratings from Court Watch NOLA, retired this year. Whoever takes this election serves the remainder of Marullo’s vacated seat until 2020. Guillory is a former prosecutor, turned criminal defense attorney, turned-back prosecutor. Moore is a former software engineer-turned-defense lawyer with Orleans Public Defenders, whose campaign promises to streamline court processes by incorporating the Internet. Bonin is an old hat relative-progressive, who is choosing to take the perceived “step down” to Criminal Court because he says he is sick of seeing bad cases go through appeals.

* * *
Next up, folks in the French Quarter, Algiers, Marigny, and Bywater (District 4), in the Uptown/Carrollton area (District 6), and in Gentilly (District 7) are electing board members to serve for the next four years on the Orleans Parish School Board (OPSB).

The future holds a brand new experiment in public education: OPSB will be governing a never-before-seen public school system of mostly charter schools. Act 91, signed by the Governor this May, provides for the “unification” of New Orleans’ schools by limiting the School Board’s abilities. OPSB can open or close a school. It can evaluate the quality of education at schools. If the quality of education passes the check, but the charter network is paying their CEO $200K, OPSB can’t do anything about it. Charter networks will have unprecedented autonomy over their financial matters, which is expected to exacerbate inequity between schools. This is the new reality of public education in New Orleans.

Ellison, the incumbent, faces Umrani, a community organizer from the realm of criminal justice reform. We trust Umrani’s experience in grassroots-style work to prioritize community engagement in OPSB. However, his focus on the connection between juvenile incarceration and public education is unlikely to be relevant at this time. I know that’s harsh, but have you seen OPSB’s schedule? They’re strictly dealing with unification through its July 2018 deadline!

We thought Ellison might be an efficient, good-enough choice for this position - she wants to return charter school control to OPSB from the state - until someone sent us some intel on her straight-up saying "There is no such thing" as the separation of church and state (See comments section below). This was in the context of her support of a 2013 OPSB bill that would have allowed charter schools to willfully exclude gay students from enrollment. Um, welcome to humanity, Louisiana politicians!

Meanwhile, Moe Reed was caught up in some flak after he posted a Facebook message sympathetic to the man who killed the Dallas cops over the summer. He later apologized, writing "You can understand a black man waking up and being a little bit upset."He has since suspended his campaign, citing fortune cookie advice to "Keep your goals away from the trolls."

VOTE: Umrani all the waySuggested Resources: Okay, so many of the candidates have their own campaign websites, but just Ellison has her own theme song: turn up the volume, then click the link! Live on Facebook with Walter Umrani , short videos on The New Orleans Tribune Facebook page, September 2016.MEMBER OF SCHOOL BOARD DISTRICT 6
David Alvarez
Woody Koppel

Koppel is generally not-well-liked as incumbent among concerned community members, mostly for being a landlord and business-first politician, who does not take a strong leadership position on equity. David Alvarez’s campaign materials call for increased transparency of charter school management, social justice and accountability, community engagement on education reform, and “restorative” methods to student discipline. Hey, I like his campaign materials! He is a bit libertarian-ish on the compulsory vaccination front - (He thinks the chicken pox vaccine should be optional, which is terrible for the immuno-compromised among us, such as the elderly, the infants, and the HIV-affected) - so hopefully the School Board doesn't have a lot of influence on public health initiatives for children.

VOTE: David AlvarezSuggested resources: Live on Facebook with David Alvarez and Woody Koppel Part 1 and Part 2, short videos on The New Orleans Tribune Facebook page, September 2016.

Incumbent Nolan is pleading to stay on OPSB because of a $1 million grant that he wants to continue working on. His challengers are both contenders for the position given their strong critiques of the status quo at OPSB and at charter schools. It’s nearly impossible to find information on Crusto except one hard-to-find video interview and his campaign finances (Ever been duped by the Carson Company realtors? They manage some of Crusto's real estate listings and contributed a whole lot to his campaign). Smith, on the other hand, is an outspoken challenger. His responses to the League of Women Voters questionnaire seem favorable: Collective bargaining and the organized labor of teachers? Check. Community voice in decision-making? Check. Equitable resources for teachers, students, and facilities? Check.VOTE: Kwame SmithSuggested resources: Live on Facebook with Kwame Smith, Alvin Crusto, Jr Part 1 and Part 2, and Nolan Marshall, short videos on The New Orleans Tribune Facebook page, September 2016.

CA NO. 1 (ACT 677 - HB 459) - Registrar of VotersDo you support an amendment to provide that the manner of appointment for the registrar of voters in each parish is as provided by law and to require the qualifications of the registrar to be provided by law?

In response to a more technically difficult system of voting, lawmakers want to increase the educational requirements of the Registrar of Voters staff. Opposition to this amendment centers on rural areas where that educational requirement would be hard to meet. Supporters want the voting process to be managed by people with qualifications, and they say this measure could curb nepotism.

All in all, there are no immediate consequences to this change: All the Registrar of Voters positions in the State are filled, and those currently holding this position who don't meet the new proposed educational requirements would be grandfathered in. Typically, the Registrar of Voters is hired from within the Registrar’s office already anyway, so what’s the point? This would make government neither more efficient nor transparent.

But wait, there's more! Representative Danahay (Dem - Lake Charles), who introduced this bill, is noteworthy for his past political work that limits people's voting rights: He voted to reduce the number of hours that polling locations remain
open. He voted against a measure that would have expanded voting rights for people convicted of felonies. He also has supported the requirement for drug testing of welfare recipients, and co-sponsored a the 2014 bill that mandated abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges, severely limited women's access to reproductive healthcare treatment. We do not trust this guy with our civil rights!

Vote NO

CA NO. 2 (ACT 680 - SB 80) - Establish Tuition without Legislative ApprovalDo you support an amendment to authorize the postsecondary education management boards to establish the tuition and mandatory fee amounts charged by institutions under their supervision and management, without legislative approval?
This amendment proposes that control of tuition cost-setting for public universities and colleges move from the legislature to pre-existing “management boards.” These schools have traditionally been regulated by the State in order to provide low-cost options and greater accessibility to higher learning for the public. On principle, we are against the deregulation of public institutions with this kind of mission. This amendment smells like the largely unaccountable trend towards privatization that has been steadily encroaching on public schools here, and eroding public oversight of them.

But, to be sure, Louisiana’s public universities and colleges have been needlessly suffering the brunt of the State’s budget crisis. Since 2008, higher education budget cuts in Louisiana have been more brutal than in any other state. As such, Louisiana schools are pushing for greater autonomy: to raise tuition to cover costs in most cases, and in some cases, to become more competitive by lowering tuition for out-of-state students.

Vote NO because higher education needs more investment, but deregulation isn’t the answer. Or YES if you’re exasperated by how little Louisiana spends on its public universities and colleges.

CA NO. 3 (ACT 31 - HB 31) - Eliminate Deductibility of Federal Income TaxesDo you support an amendment to eliminate the deductibility of federal income taxes paid in computing state corporate income taxes? (Effective January 1, 2017)

At this time, corporations can deduct their federal tax payments when preparing their state corporate income taxes. This is wrongfully letting corporations off the hook.

Vote YES so federal tax payments cannot be used as a deduction when calculating state corporate income taxes.

CA NO. 4 (ACT 678 - HB 505) - Homestead Exemption-Surviving SpouseDo you support an amendment to authorize an exemption from ad valorem property tax for the total assessed value of the homestead of an unmarried surviving spouse of a person who died while on active duty as a member of the armed forces of the United States or the Louisiana National Guard, or while performing their duties as a state police, law enforcement, or fire protection officer? (Effective December 1, 2016)

Don’t let the headline fool you: it is not the homestead exemption but an exemption on all ad valorem property taxes. This is an amendment to a property tax exemption for widowed police/fire/military spouses that would allow them to keep their exemption if they move to a different house. What with flooding, hurricanes, fracking, and coastal erosion, housing displacement comes as no surprise to residents of this state. We support any effort to keep people housed affordably and safely.

So what’s the catch here? It seems Mike Johnson (Republican-Bossier City) introduced this amendment for political points. Remember him? The guy who introduced Indiana-style religious freedom, anti-LGBTQA legislation in 2015 with the support of ol' Bobby Jindal (it died in committee) and became the hero of nihilistic social conservatives? He is establishing himself as a professional politician (and Trump shill), and has bigger aims than state legislature. Johnson is likely trying to use this amendment to build his supportive voter base with military and law enforcement families. This amendment was co-sponsored by Rep. Danahay (see Constitutional Amendment #1, above), whom we also don't trust.

But we don't like dividing people this way. Where are the bills that protect, honor, and advantage the protesters who were attacked by police and National Guard in Baton Rouge this summer? Where's the ad valorem property tax exemption for the family of Alton Sterling (may he rest in peace)? We need better ways to support our heroes.

VOTE: YES, but let’s do more to promote housing justice.

CA NO. 5 (ACT 679 - HB 603) - Revenue Stabilization Trust FundDo you support an amendment to establish the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund for the deposit of recurring mineral and corporate tax revenues, to restrict the use of the fund to 10% of the balance when the balance reaches $5 billion, to restrict the use of the fund to construction projects and transportation infrastructure, and to allocate recurring mineral revenues to the payment of state employee retirement debt?

Louisiana’s budget is unsustainable, and the sponsor of this bill, Walt Leger III (Democrat-New Orleans), thinks this new trust fund will help steady it in the long term. Basically, some money will be deposited in this hands-off account, so there’s no spending when times are good only to cut when times are bad. Smart decision.

VOTE: YES

CA NO. 6 (ACT 681 - SB 201) - Use Funds to Eliminate Projected DeficitsDo you support an amendment to authorize the use of up to five percent of current year appropriations or allocations from statutorily or certain constitutionally created funds or up to one percent of the current year's balances in certain constitutionally created funds to eliminate a projected deficit in the next fiscal year if the official forecast for the next fiscal year is less than the official forecast for the current fiscal year or if the official forecast has been reduced by at least one percent from the most recently adopted estimate for the ensuing fiscal year, and to exempt certain funds and mandates from being used to eliminate a projected deficit?
This proposed amendment reduces constitutional protection of funds in one year, with the purpose of funding gaps in the next year. The major drawback is that presently protected funds are made vulnerable to mid-year budget cuts. Makes sense if it were personal budgets, but when it is the State’s budget and we’ve elected some folks to be responsible for adequately funding public operations, then we’d prefer those legislators simply be responsible and do their jobs. This one had near unanimous support in House and Senate because they don’t care to work hard for us.

Oak Island Neighborhood Improvement District Proposition - $150 Parcel Fee - CC - 10 Yrs. an expected $45,000.00 annually
A dangerous precedent is set by crowd-sourcing greater safety and security for people with expendable income, favoring the lives and livelihood of certain people and making those neighborhoods less affordable to live in. Invest those hundreds of thousands of dollars in something that benefits the vibrant, urban fabric of our city, like community organizations and schools.

VOTE: NO.

PARISHWIDE PROPOSITIONCity Charter Amendment - Financial and Operational Independence of the Office of Inspector General, Office of Independent Police Monitor, and Ethics Review Board Shall Sections 9-401 and 9-402 of the Home Rule Charter of the City of New Orleans be amended and new Sections 9-403, 9-404 and 9-405 be enacted relative to the financial and operational independence of the Office of lnspector General, Office of lndependent Police Monitor, and Ethics Review Board, effective January 1, 2017: (1) to apportion funding among the three local ethics entities; (2) to establish each such local ethics entity as financially and operationally independent; and (3) to provide for annual independent external evaluation procedures for each such entity?

The New Orleans Independent Police Monitor (NOIPM) is an independent, civilian police oversight agency through which you can file complaints against NOPD (or commend an officer). In 2006, a coalition of community groups brought their concerns about New Orleans Police Department to the New Orleans City Council. By 2008, the city council supported the Police Monitor’s Office in a resolution. In 2008, the Police Monitor's Office, along with the Office of Inspector General, were voted into the city charter by over 70% of the New Orleans electorate.

Y’all remember last Fall when the epic battle between Inspector General Ed Quatrevaux and Police Monitor Susan Hutson played out? He tried to gut her position; she called him racist/misogynist/vengeful/vindictive, etc. Then, City Council intervened.

City Council members introduced an ordinance to give the police monitor a set budget and increase its staff, but us voters have to give it our support. In the meantime, the temporary resolution (conditional that there be no more public trash talk) stipulated that NOIPM was to be guaranteed a percentage of funding from the Inspector General’s office, but it had to move out of its shared office in the Federal Reserve building. Well NOIPM is in its spot by Canal and Broad.

14 comments:

Leslie Ellison has a history of outspoken homophobia/transphobia, including using her position on OPSB to try to make life harder for queer kids. Here's some reporting from over the years; I can personally verify the stories about her actions on bills in 2011 or 2012, as I was either in the committee room or watching her testimony on the livestream.

She's quoted in opposition to a 2011 anti-bullying bill in this piece from BayouBuzz (that was my very first legislative hearing, actually): http://www.bayoubuzz.com/buzz/latest-buzz/item/1692-louisiana-school-bullying-legislation-not-a-gay-experience

Here's Clancy DuBos on a 2012 bill to allow charter schools to refuse gay kids (which, interestingly, sort of prefigures the current conflict we're seeing with AG Landry insisting that contracts with the state shouldn't include nondiscrimination clauses): http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2012/04/07/modern-day-segregationists

Here's some straight reporting on that same bill, which includes Leslie Ellison's testimony that she refused to sign her charter school's contract with the state because she claimed it violated her religious freedom: http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/03/bill_approved_to_prevent_gover.html

And here's a news piece from her 2013 attempt to repeal OPSB's bullying policy, in which she explicitly said there's no such thing as the separation of church and state and that it should be okay to discriminate against queer kids: http://www.nola.com/education/index.ssf/2013/07/orleans_parish_school_board_vp.html

If she's changed her views at all since then, it hasn't been in the news. This kind of history should give people some concern.

Unfortunately I have to disagree that CA1 is pointless. This smells strongly of favoritism, making the hiring-from-within practice codified into law. With higher barriers to entry for those without a BA, the state will default to those already in the system. I know you say they do this already, but that doesn't make the codification too comforting. Harm reduction includes harm avoidance.

In addition, the bill was sponsored by Rep. Danahay, who regularly votes for voter-suppression measures. Like HB 598 this year, which would've given felons the right to vote once they were out of jail (he voted no). And HB 209, which reduced the number of hours that the polls/registrar's offices were open on election days (he voted yes, and it passed).

He also sponsored HB 578, which expanded early voting days, something that often increases Republican turnout for elections.

So yeah, it may be too late to affect your published changes, but I just wanted to say how surprised I was you took a "meh" attitude to this proposition.

Based on a conversation with one of our researchers, David Alvarez is not anti-vaxx in general, but believes vaccines for what he identifies as "non-life threatening illnesses" (especially chicken pox) should not be mandatory/compulsory.

1. Considering this, "If Jill and the Green Party can get 5 percent of the vote we will have $10 million in federal funds in 2020 and broad, nationwide ballot access," downplaying the importance of the presidential vote and not recommending that one's vote be cast for Jill Stein is troubling. "It is imperative that you join me in contributing to the Stein/Baraka presidential campaign and vote for Jill and Ajamu in the upcoming election." -Chris Hedges. Don't you want to empower the movement behind the lone voice of reason amongst the four highest polling candidates? The other three don't consider climate change a (high) priority. I hope you update the guide to recommend Jill Stein in light of the positive repercussions achieved if she gets 5%. (unless you don't want that sane voice/movement empowered?? no offense, I'm just not getting it)

Thanks for writing! Some of us on the team are big Jill supporters, so we hear your point. (It should also be mentioned that some of us on the team are NOT fans of the Green Party.) Our consensus decision was to promote state/local elections and constitutional amendments as greater pathways to the expression of The People's power. The presidential election is of course very important. We hope whoever wins furthers our justice-driven agenda.

Hm, so the same group that is comfortable recommending pro-TPP (amongst other grievous ills) Democrats for strategic voting (which is fair given the alternative), ultimately judges that Jill is unacceptable for recommendation - the same Jill who was endorsed by Chomsky in 2012 and is currently endorsed by Cornel West, Kshama Sawant, Medea Benjamin, Richard Stallman, etc.

In the interest of transparency and raising awareness, can you please share with all of us the logic of those against recommending Jill in a solidly red state, so that we may all understand the motive that is against an actual environmentalist getting an achievable 5% of the vote? As Jill has been repeatedly vetted by this nation's foremost progressive activists and intellectuals, what purported outweighing information/counter-argument somehow escaped all their scrutiny, resulting in her recommendation by this group being vetoed?

As you can see in the guide, we are recommending that you "Vote your conscience" in the presidential election. We do not promote traditional bi-party-system strategic voting for the presidential election.

Further, the presidential race has wide coverage as is (as you noted), and this voting guide does not seek to amplify that discussion. The folks who created this guide care about local elections and constitutional amendments first and foremost.

Isn't it a little late to "wait" and see who's a contender? And could you please include website links or Facebook in the future? Just thoughts.1st Congressional District:-------------------------------------------Danil Faust - www.danilfaust.com

Joe Swider - www.geauxjoe.com

Lee Ann Dugas - https://www.facebook.com/Dugas4Congress/

Eliot Baron - http://www.eliotsbarronforcongress.com/

Howard Kearny: http://www.kearneyforcongress.com/

Chuemai Yang - No Contact Information Available (Nobody has ever seen him)

Thank you for your contribution! I have linked to your website by your name. (Apologies for the prior misspelling!) And yes, while we would have liked to have made a more committed endorsement in that race, we have not been wowed by any particular candidate's odds. Make your case, Sir!

Argh! Now I see this! Honestly, no one can beat Scalise at this point unless the people truly want him to lose. No candidate has put any funds into the race. Swider is getting some backing but failed to file any reports. Dugas gained some traction but has no internet presence. Baron, well, he seems nice, but I've never seen him at anything, although I have chatted online. Yang? Nobody has seen him, but he has a nice website. Kearney? Hah. I've met him once at the Loyola Alliance for Good Government forum. Getting funds out of the poor is difficult, because well, we're poor. Since I'm not willing to sell out, I didn't gain traction, but I do have an idea of the Jungle system, let's hope they don't change too many laws. Thanks for the link!