Why should anyone be
concerned with the idea of population control in today’s
increasingly crowded world? The earth will soon pass seven billion
people and the number of people born into poverty is set to rise.
Increasingly the idea of controlling the world’s population
through non-coercive means is a topic of debate in the world’s
capitals. Should we be concerned? Should anyone be concerned with
the idea of population control as it is debated in our newspapers
and magazines and TV shows?

What is population
control?

Population control is any methodology used
to control the type, location and number of people that inhabit the
earth. Public debate is strictly limited however to non-coercive
means in achieving any one of these goals, especially with regards to
population reduction. An important example of this would be allowing
people the free choice on procreative matters. By using various
methodologies both economic and administrative and educational to
dissuade people from having more children than needed, a stable
population base can be created. It should be noted here that the
prevailing viewpoint of the world’s decision makers is that
Population control and environmental devastation are linked and the
former contributes heavily to the latter. This view is foundational
to understand the policies that are formulated to combat, what is
viewed by policy makers as a runaway population explosion. Indeed,
when the Nation Intelligence Council (NIC) held their Global Trends
Conference they identified seven key drivers that would shape the
globe through the year 2015. The first was demographics; the second
was natural resources and environment.[i]
These trends are of the utmost importance to understand if we
are to understand the motives and policies that are driving the
population control agenda. Related terms and policy paradigms and
nomenclature are 'Sustainable Development', 'Agenda 21',
‘Rio Conference’ ‘Biodiversity Treaty’,
‘Bioshpere Reserves’, ‘World Heritage
Treaty’, ‘Ecosystem Management’,
‘Desertification Treaty’, Ecosystem Management
etc. The idea that there are too many people inhabiting the earth is
one that is ingrained in the world’s leaders and one that, in
their view, requires a solution.

What kinds of solutions?

The only socially and psychologically
acceptable solution available to policy makers when discussing
reducing the world’s population is education. While other
methods are debated they are rarely employed or even discussed with
any real publicity. These include various methods of taxation and
other forms of financial disincentives. These methods are important
to note because barring success of the educational solution track,
the financial/administrative[ii]
disincentives administrative will probably become more likely as a
method of reducing populations. However, this method is only really
available where there is some degree of wealth and a fairly well
developed governmental institutions capable of enforcing such a
regimen. These are the regions that are the primary target of the so
called population control agenda; remote, poor, economically
underdeveloped regions of the world. Thus, if global policy makers
are to have any success in their war on population (people), other
methods must be employed.

Americans have truly been blessed. Many nations on Earth do not
have enough food to feed their populations. However, recently
the ability to increase food production is being hindered by bizarre
weather patterns. In various regions on Earth, including in America,
important food production areas are being challenged with floods. In
other places, drought has been a serious problem.
Unfortunately, though damaging as these natural disasters are, a more
troubling danger contributing to world hunger is that of unequal
distribution and shortages caused not by a lack of supply, but in
unsold grain and food stocks that are kept off the market in order to
keep the prices of grain high. Far from being a nefarious policy,
this is done primarily to keep farmers in business. Despite the many
advances, technologically speaking, in agricultural production
techniques, hunger on a massive scale still exists in many parts of
the world. The intervention of the world’s governments and by
private institutions has been extensive and commendable.
Nevertheless, large pockets of poverty and starvation remain in
Portions of Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

Many of these trends have much of their roots in post-colonial
economic and agricultural policies and others have their roots in
mismanagement by many institutions that have ostensibly attempted to
alleviate hunger and poverty in these regions. Falling
commodity prices in the 1970’s and 1980’s did not help
third world nations whose principle source of hard currency was
through these same commodities. Many of these nations also carried
large a foreign debt load. These debts could only be repaid with the
earnings collected from those commodities, which were increasingly
worth less, in monetary terms. While most of these nations learned to
manage their debt to some degree, it often meant decreased living
standards for much of the rest of the population in these nations.
The lack of a coherent and successful policy in the 1970’s and
1980’s is leaving increasing problems in Africa in particular
as it is one of the few region in the world where poverty, epidemics
and ethnic violence are converging on a continent at the same time.
Unfortunately where such misery exists there are always a few vile
men who will attempt to exploit the situation for all its worth. Even
using a starving means need to “influence” their
“behavior”. Such moral perversity can be found in the
United Nations food program.

“Food is
power. We use it to change behavior, some may call it bribery. We do
not apologize.”-Catherine Bertini, executive director of
the U.N. World Food Program.

The idea in the minds of most people is that the UN is a
benevolent organization who wishes only to help the helpless and
bring peace to the world. I submit to you that it is not.
While in the past the UN has helped some. It usually does so when the
bright lights of publicity are shining and the CNN cameras are
rolling. In reality, a review of the action of the World Bank and
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and to a lesser degree, the
Bank of International Settlements (BIS), all of which are associate
agencies of the UN, have used their money creating authority to loan
money to third world nations, at interest, ostensibly to help these
countries with much needed development. Because these nations
have only one thing the west wants, its natural resources
(commodities), these nations once they default, become the economic
vassals of the IMF and the World Bank. This is one of the
reasons there are so many problems in Africa today. Despite the
veiled attempts by the national establishment media to portray to the
American people that Africa cannot take care of itself, often the
real problem is the austerity measures which frequently take the form
of price controls and currency devaluation’s which take an
enormous toll on the general population in these struggling nations.
Often the prognostications of the experts of these economic
organizations deliberately overvalue the price of commodities
produced by these developing nations thereby making them eligible for
larger loan amounts. It has been argued back and forth by the
banks supporters and detractors weather or not the World Bank is
truly in business to help the poor nations out of their poverty, or
simply an instrument for the rich nations to plunder the natural
resources of the poor nations. It is a debate that will certainly
continue, that is, until the remaining portions of that wealth is in
the hands of the corporations and money-changers.

One of the first victims of this unseen war is the children of
these nations. As living standards in these already poor
nations’ declines, the children are often forced to work to
help make ends meet in these families. Food becomes scarce as
social conditions deteriorate. This often adds fuel to the fire
of already tense ethnic tensions with violence the frequent result.
The World Bank and the IMF are very much part of the problem in this
region of the World. The most important reason these nefarious
policies can continue is that, first, the mainstream media simply
don’t report the facts to the American people and secondly,
because most Americans are too busy to make more than a cursory look
at these institutions and have no desire to look beyond the catch-all
phrases to really care.

But today we do have some people who are attempting to sound the
alarm bells. The turmoil in the Asian markets in late 1997 and
1998 showed an increasing debate as to the role of the international
financial institutions. Hopefully, the debate will move into
directions which will lead to reform of these institutions and a
reduction in their role in profiting from human misery. It may also
help alleviate the swirling mystery of how these institutions make
some bizarre and at times abominable decisions, brought on by the
World Bank’s obsession with secrecy. What are they doing
with our taxpayer money that they don’t want anyone to know
about? In this day and age, it would seem impossible to imagine a
world without the likes of the money-changers. However, the use
of debt to help out others is not a sound way to help thy neighbor.
The use of other peoples money to loan out to basket case economies
for private profit, lends itself to a very, dangerous and immoral
situation which the people accept all too willingly, mostly out of
abject ignorance

Unfortunately, there seems to be another purpose to the United
Nations policy makers, which with a little investigation, reveals
itself in the oft repeated slogan of population control.
Population control is rooted in the idea that the world’s
population is increasing too rapidly and is outstripping natural
resources.

“We must
speak far more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about
abortion, about values that control population, because the
ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the
population by 90 percent and there aren’t enough people left to
do a great deal of ecological damage.”

These remarks were spoken by Dr. Sam Keen, a new age writer, at
the 1996 Gorbachev conference in San Francisco. His remarked were
received with warm applause, by the new “Intellectuals”.
How he proposes to do away with 5 billion people was, of course,
never discussed.

“My own
doubts came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two years, it
had eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT in hindsight is
that it had greatly added to the population problem.”

This statement was made by Alexander King, president of the Club
of Rome, a think tank for elitist and socialist ideas, which
interlocks with the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the
Trilateral Commission. Now according to the National Academy of
Sciences, DDT had prevented 500 million deaths. Consequently, the
Globalists set out to ban the use of DDT, not because it wasn’t
effective or safe, but because it saved human lives. To these
butchers, the preservation of human life is evil, letting hundreds of
millions of people die is good.

Let us look at Africa, the Rwanda situation should have sent off
alarm bells to the American people, unfortunately, during those
massacres the WWF, and Bart Simpson were also on television,
consequently, little attention was paid by the American masses. The
Genocide first began in April of 1994. In the Early 1990’s the
Hutu led military issued decrees disarming the largely Christian
Tutsi’s. After the Tutsi’s were disarmed, the Hutu’s,
using machetes massacred 800,000 Tutsi’s. Please take note,
Madeline Albright[i]
insisted the word Genocide not be used. This is because
such a word must call for trials. American foreign policy did
not want that to happen. One must wonder if the American
foreign policy establishment really wanted the murder to come to
an end before any neighboring African troops intervened, as
American troops prevented others form entering in to render medical
assistance to the sick and dying. Now the Hutu’s, after their
faithful slaughter, has received millions of dollars in aid from no
other source than the US Government. What is ignored is that fact the
weapon of choice was the machete, a weapon easily outclassed by a
simple machine gun. The argument that the safety of any
intervening troops, the primary consideration for denying entry in to
the ravaged areas, simply lacks credibility. The press, course,
as the faithful and diligent defender of the elite, took its
pre-scripted role of mute silence, was remiss in not explaining who
and why no help was sent.

Time would fail me to discuss the effects on population that the
HIV virus has had in Africa, where some of the infection rates in
African militaries are over 75%. Whether you believe AIDS is
man made or naturally occurring, the effects on population has been
the same. Let me ask this question? Since when has having an
incurable, contagious disease which just so happens to be transmitted
through the act of reproduction (that is, making more people) been
treated like a protected status, where some have even called for
special rights? Has this helped curtail or spread the disease?
Since when has our society shown such kindness on people whose
illness is always fatal? Since when have our leaders been so quick to
move to protect the homosexual population, (whose sexual activities
coincidentally do not bring about procreation), while largely
understating the effects of AIDS in Africa? One factor seems to be
increasing clear, it is Africa that is the target. Resource rich,
beautiful Africa, populated with what Margeret Sanger, the Founder
of Planned Parenthood called, ‘human weeds’, that is,
Black people[ii].
The Infamous Tuskeegee study is another interesting scene in the
panorama of America’s medical experiments. Here black men were,
after, being told they were being treated for their
illness, (syphilis) were deliberately kept from medicines which
would cure them, so that doctors could observe the effects of
syphilis on men.

One must wonder when we will see crematoriums and gas chambers in
America.

Let us consider the Abortion issue, once again it coincides
completely with the population control agenda; the less people born
the better. This form of murder seems far less objectionable to
many Americans because the human life killed has no one to mourn for
it, especially when its own mother is the butcher. When the abortion
issue is raised, it is almost invariably raised in conjunction with
the poor and yes, we have it again, black’s. The
implication here is that ‘these people’, according to
much of what we hear from many quarters, cannot control themselves,
and if more of “them” are born it will just add to the
burden of welfare and crime to our societies. Margaret Sanger
who I mentioned before was the founder of Planned Parenthood, she
organized the “Negro project” this was designed to
eliminate what she believed to be an inferior race of people:

“The Masses
of Negroes... particularly from the south, still breed carelessly and
disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even
more than among whites is from that portion of the population least
intelligent and fit.”-Margaret
Sanger- The Negro Project[iii].

As you can see Planned Parenthood has some interesting beginnings
that are not generally known, for obvious reasons.

Ms. Sanger also intended to hire some black ministers to
propagandize for birth control.

“The most
successful educational approach to the Negro is through Religious
appeal. We do not want word to get out that we want to exterminate
the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten
out the idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious
members.”- Margaret Sanger[iv]

Yes, the Ghost of Adolph Hitler is alive and well. It has been
living in America for 50 some years, in the person of our
Presidents[v],
who support organizations such as Planned Parenthood[vi]
and their Cabinets, many of our Doctors and Senators, in our
corporate board rooms and in our living rooms, in our news rooms and
in our schools. The American people are just like the Germans so many
years ago, in denial. Until the stench of rotting
corpses was unmistakable, most Germans were also in denial.
Even then, most simply shut their eyes from seeing. Those that
do see are cowering in the dark, knowing full well what awaits them
if they speak out. A few are speaking out, but only a few, Americans
may be able to hear them during a commercial break, while watching
another inane sitcom or perhaps another sports extravaganza. That is
provided, they aren’t doped up or drunk. Of course the
infantile refrain is ‘you know, it can’t happen here,
this is America!’ Of course ‘America’ is the magic
word and all corruption and evil magically disappear when you say
America!! And if you, as an American, really believe that, then
you have definitely been watching too much T.V.!

Blood is crying from the ground, the desire of those who are
formulating UN population policy have all made target estimates of
500 million to 3 billion people as the ideal population of Earth.
Some have stated that it is imperative that this be accomplished,
soon, by any available means.

"At present
the population of the world is increasing ... War so far has had no
great effect on this increase ... I do not pretend that birth control
is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing.
There are others ... If a Black Death could be spread throughout the
world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely
without making the world too full ... the state of affairs might be
somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded people are
indifferent to suffering, especially that of others." - Bertrand Russell[vii]

Population control is a integral part of the Globalist agenda. One
point that should be made here is that the Nazi's own population
control agenda was formulated and executed with extreme secrecy.
While the Jews of Germany were horribly persecuted and demonized by
the state, the systematic extermination of the Jews was not
a publicly announced policy. All notes of the Wannsee
Conference, where the policy of extermination was planned and
discussed, were to be burned and the topic of the conference was held
in extreme secrecy. So consider this dear reader, while all the signs
were present that this is what Hitler had planned for the Jews, the
actual policy was carried out secretly. History is repeating
itself today. Far too many suspicions diseases are being discovered
and the deaths of far too many micro-biologists who work in genetics
are happening to all be a just a 'coincidence'. Coincidence theorists
are the ones who would stand by and watch the holocaust happen all
over again while they cling to their religion of 'coincidental
denial'[iv].
Today or at least very soon, it will be possible to create viruses
that only kill certain races of people, thus using science (just like
the Nazi's) to exterminate people with a high degree of secrecy. This
will be a possibility that no one really will consider until great
swaths of the human family have been wiped out by a few powerful and
satanically inspired people. Secrecy will work greatly to the
advantage of these evil men because anyone who speaks about it can be
labeled a 'conspiracy nut' while the body bags are being filled. This
is working now as a successful tact, as many much of the population
of Africa has been decimated by AIDS and any who questions the
suspicious causes of the disease, the extremely ineffective methods
employed in combating it and the extreme pricing in medications is
labeled a 'conspiracy nut' or a 'right wing wacko'. If indeed our
policy makers wanted to solve the AIDS crisis, serious debate as to
the causes of this dreadful disease should be explored without
scientific or political prejudices. This has not only not
happened, but woe to any suggest such a ‘unproductive’
course of action.

Migration

Another method of population control is through controlled
migration. This is a method whereby large swaths of people are
uprooted to new locations. This can be done by a variety of methods.

B. War: Causing large scale
military unrest where it is desired to have people migrate from such
as regions rich in natural resources

C. Disease: Using disease or
the fear of disease to encourage migration

D: Famine: Using famine as a
means to induce people to migrate.

These and other methods can be used to control populations, not so
much in a quantitative sense, but at least in terms of location.
Highly concentrated populations are easier to control than widely
dispersed ones and those with a rudimentary access to various forms
of controlled media (electronic or print) tend to be somewhat more
docile.

The CIA states clearly that the there are two forms of migration
that will be most prevent in the coming years

It should be noted here that when the National Intelligence
Council presented its Global Trends 2015, they noted that State
actors would play a dormant role in many of the emerging changes and
that other non-state actors would be more important in shaping the
globe. This will be true in many respects as the international
corporation, the terrorist and the banker are far more important to
today’s global changes than Governments. The report went on to
say that in the absence of a
clear and overriding national security threat,

“United
States will have difficulty drawing on its economic prowess to

advance
its foreign policy agenda. The top priority of the American private

Here notice that the NIC realized the importance of the so-called
‘private sector’ (Corporations). So let it be noted here
that these things are being discussed in antiseptically clean board
rooms where the average American is not allowed entry or even invited
to attend.

While this report certainly does not provide any solutions to
these problems rest assured that if the problem has been identified,
someone somewhere will be tasked to come up with solutions. What
these solutions are or even the fact that they have been decided upon
is rarely made public, though the funding for it will be footed by
the taxpayer. Such a solution was sought by the US government back in
the 1970’s. The Nixon administration with then secretary of
State Henry Kissinger formulated a truly Malthusian policy of
depopulation in National
Security Action Memorandum 200. The US Government at the time
considered the growing populations of the developing world as a grave
threat to US national security. From then on a curious pattern begins
to take shape. Indeed in the recent past, the deaths of many
microbiologists is one that needs to be understood in light of the
above memorandum and statements by our elite. Click
Here(information is from www.copvcia.com
and www.Rense.com )for
some background information. Something most suspicious is going on
and no one is speaking about it… at all. It is not
unreasonable, despite how many talking heads on TV say it
is, to question and follow up with more questions regarding these
suspicious deaths. What is going on? Who is responsible and what is
the ultimate aim?

Technology

Another more prevalent method of population control is through the
use of technology. This is used for a variety of purposes, from crime
prevention, monitoring and tracking and ultimately the total control
of society. The American Total Information Awareness Office
(TIA) is such an agency spawned out of the pit of hell. Headed by the
convicted Felon, Admiral John Poindexter, who was later forced to
resign over his ‘terrorism casino’ proposal (which
provide a place where people could bet on future terrorist attacks),
this office is bent on collecting, tracking and analyzing as much
information of Americans as is technologically possible. The legal
framework for the use of these new technologies has been codified in
the US Patriot act. Ostensibly the act was to be used to stop
terrorism, in reality in is becoming increasingly clear that the act
was formulated long before the 911 attacks and was lying in wait just
for such an attack to occur. Undermining the foundation principles of
American Constitutional government is of extreme necessity in order
to control populations. Using the technological advances of the
recent past, controlling populations is front page news in most
newspapers, from spy camera’s to microscopic electronic tags in
clothing, from smart highways to computer spyware. These are all part
of American life now, weather one is aware of these daily intrusions
or not. Centralized planning for future population control
technologies was imperative, the Soviet Union did it, the Nazi’s
did it and now America is doing it, using as a catalyst, the TIA
office. Such planning and the psychological preparations that go with
it are necessary for a totalitarian state.

“When
a society becomes increasingly totalitarian ("society", not
"state"), it creates more and more difficulties of
adaptation and requires its citizens to be
conformist in the samedegree. Thus, this
technique becomes all the more necessary. I have no doubt that it
makes men better balanced and “happier”. And there is the
danger. It makes men happy in a milieu which normally would have made
them unhappy, if they had not been worked, on, molded, and formed for
just that milieu. What looks like the apex of humanism is in fact the
pinnacle of human submission: children are educated to become
precisely what society expects of them. They must have social
consciences that allow them to strive for the same ends as society
sets for itself. – Jacques
Ellul[v]

Thus the preparatory psychological and legal frameworks have been
set in order to provide our government and intelligentsia with the
tools needed to control populations through technological means. At
present these are conducted usually for the so called war on
terrorism, a quaint euphemism that is increasing seen as a war on all
kinds of political and economic dissent. The danger here for
the intelligentsia is that once their usefulness is complete, they
too become victims of the system that they helped create. This was
true of Stalin’s regime and to a lesser degree, Hitler’s.
Those at the pinnacle of such power historically have never been able
to maintain that power without succumbing to varying degrees of
paranoia. This paranoia dispenses with the threat, real, perceived
and delusional with extreme methods. This is true today of in
America, John Ashcroft and George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld have
succumbed to this paranoia and are using every means at their
disposal to counter the threat, as they perceive it. That threat is
terrorism. However, just like in Stalin’s Russia, such a
pathological view coupled with violent actions invariably breeds
enemies that did not exist before, sowing the seeds of its own
destruction. Thus, these technological methods that are today being
employed with increasingly less crudeness are creating a vast cadre
of resistance not only in the political arena, but also in the
scientific community. The Federation of American Scientists exposes
much government corruption and misuse of technology and makes their
information available to all. This is just one group of America’s
intelligentsia that have been useful to the system but are seeing the
fruit of their labor used for purposes that are neither in the public
interest nor in the long term interest of the nation.

Globalization has played an important role in population control
insofar as this process is harmonizing legal, technological, economic
and political frameworks for the coming global government. This
process has neither been easy nor without major setbacks. Indeed it
has been very difficult for global planners to get some of their
agenda implemented because large segments of the population have
become aware of the ‘agenda’ and are highly suspicious of
the semi-secrecy with which these elitists work. A book could be
written on this issue alone and indeed many have.

____________________________________________________

The world at large, unfortunately still has no clue as to the
reasons and methods of the population control
agenda and that it is one of the highest priorities of most of the
world’s governments. Not just the Malthusian aspect, but every
aspect of this agenda is important when governments formulate their
policies, be it domestic or foreign. The bad news is the Children of
God are even more clueless than the average American and work
desperately hard to remain that way.

“My People
are destroyed for a lack of Knowledge, because thou hast rejected
knowledge, I will also reject thee.” (Hosea
4:6a)

“For
nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and
there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers
places. All these [are] the beginning of
sorrows.”

(Mat
24:7-8)

The Bible teaches that a famine will come where food prices will
increase dramatically, (Rev. 6:5-6) and economic conditions will
worsen. It also teaches that large segments of the population will be
killed via famine and diseases. The way of the last days economic
system seems to one of cleansing. The Devil will be busy attempting
to ‘cleanse’ the earth of Gods People (Rev 13:15) those
who cannot buy or sell will face the very real prospect of
starvation. Some may become homeless (no property taxes will be
able to be paid no rent, etc.), there will be great pressure to
acquiesce the new economic order. This system will be
allowed to come into existence for a short time. (See Rev 17:10).

Disease and pestilence are coming. Population control of the most
violent sort is coming, according the LORD Jesus Christ. I will not
preach about this to any of you. Either you believe Jesus or you
don’t.

[ii]
In The Birth Control Review a publication Ms. Sanger Published, she
praised the Nazi’s and the infanticide policies, which killed
many babies that did not posses ‘Aryan’ features, and
agreed with Hitler’s white supremacy.

[iii]
The Negro Project is often put forward by Planned Parenthood’s
defenders as beneficial to African Americans

[v]
Many do not know that the American Government spirited out many
Nazi’s and Nazi sympathizers after the war. America wanted
access to the Intelligence networks the Nazi’s had as well as
some of the Technology that was developed.

[vi]
Planned Parenthood has become almost a staple and a potent symbol of
the ‘new freedom’ that many Americans believe is a
cornerstone of Americanism. I do not dispute this. In fact, is this
type of freedom, without regard to life and personal responsibility
that is turning this nation into a graveyard for millions of victims.
Victims of this new ‘freedom’.

[ii]An
example of an administrative disincentive would be losing any
possibility of public housing or being forced into the worst kind of
housing when on public assistance or being given the lowest priority
with certain kinds of government benefits if one exceed a birth
quota.

[iii]
Named After Thomas Malthus, a British economist who wrote An
Essay on the Principle of Population (1798), arguing that
population tends to increase faster than food supply, with
inevitably disastrous results, unless the increase in population is
checked by moral restraints or by war, famine, and disease.

[iv]
Coincidental Denialists believes that there are no conspiracies and
no criminality can ever be ascribed to anyone inside government or
America’s venerated institutions. It is an article of faith
and just like many religions of the world, empirical evidence must
be explained away in order to support the religious institution of
Americanism. It is a religion that, through inaction and willful
blindness, supports corruption at the highest levels and attacks
proponents of other belief systems, such as those who have read
history.