The Politics of 'Netrunner'

As the card pool grows, opportunities for tidbits of political commentary grows. The cards act as interactive political cartoons, artistically and mechanically

Like so few games on the market, Android: Netrunner lives and breathes its themes. Set in a cyberpunk dystopian future, the game captures in cards the struggle between power-hungry mega-corporations and freewheeling hackers. Like the best cyberpunk fiction, the world of Netrunner is ripe with astute commentary on technology, society, and politics. From its broad theme to its card design, Netrunner provides ample proof that game designers can meld strong game systems, clever design, and political rhetoric into a fantastic and playful creation.

As an asymmetrical game pitting corporate bodies against rebellious individuals, Android: Netrunner is inherently political. At its broadest scope, Netrunner is about power struggles between agenda-seeking megacorps and individuals living within their dominion. Corporations, were it not for the law-breaking runners, would effortlessly advance their agendas and grow in power. In many ways, playing Netrunner is a exercise in roleplaying the maniacal forces of corporate greed against the dubious ethics of internet outlaws.

In that way, while Netrunner is inherently political, it is not necessarily biased. Even in the cyberpunk future of the game world, a future rife with corruption and oppression, runners can seem like they are merely out for their own good. Take the three runner factions for example: Shaper, Anarch, and Criminal. The rule book describes Shapers as motivated by the pure joy of hacking. They are makers and tinkerers in it for the marvel of creation. Anarchs, as the name implies, just want to sow chaos. Criminals, the rule book describes, are in it for personal gain. Yes, the struggle between individuals and corporations is a very real and ongoing one, but Netrunner also is playful with its themes in many regards.

Even so, Fantasy Flight Games does not shy away from the more openly political aspects of their narrative design. For example, the card art for Motivation, a Shaper resource, depicts Exile, one of the game’s identities, sitting despondently holding a picture of a presumably deceased loved one. The flavor text at the bottom is a musing on cyber-criminal motivation, clearly off the mark based upon the card’s tone. Another card, Interns, pokes fun at a modern labor trend with flavor text: “They’re the only labor cheaper than clones.”

The regularly released card packs consistently feature some tie-in narrative, often connecting back to existing cards as well. As the card pool grows, opportunities for tidbits of political commentary grows. The cards act as interactive political cartoons, artistically and mechanically. TGTBT, A recent addition to Netrunner, features an enormous digital logo that looks remarkably like the symbol for Bitcoins. The card’s title stands for “Too Good To Be True,” a hilarious and obvious prod at the digital currency fad. Perhaps more importantly though, the effect of the card gives runners a tag, which signifies their location has been traced by the corporation. When in use, TGTBT is both snarky commentary and minute lesson about privacy in the digital age.

Yes, Android: Netrunner a simple card game, one of many, and its fictional universe draws upon numerous science-fiction tropes established years ago, but the tiny ways that the game becomes political is important. The cyberpunk genre has always melded a sense of political revolution with technological revolution, and these themes resonate heavily today. Today, hackers literally shape global politics and breed fear in corporate oligarchies. We carry around tiny digital products that move us ever further along the cyborg spectrum. We watch as spy agencies run amok and whistle blowers are threatened with life in prison. We live in a cyberpunk present.

Few games try to incorporate political commentary at all, and few do who achieve such a thorough success. Netrunner is unique for so many reasons, not the least of which is its invitation to play in realms of political extreme, to exercise our agency in power structures we rarely have an opportunity to influence. If a tabletop game can present compelling political experiences with such force, then games as a whole are still ripe with opportunities to explore the politics of the present and the future.

White Hills epic '80s callback
Stop Mute Defeat is a determined march against encroaching imperial darkness; their eyes boring into the shadows for danger but they're aware that blinding lights can kill and distort truth. From "Overlord's" dark stomp casting nets for totalitarian warnings to "Attack Mode", which roars in with the tribal certainty that we can survive the madness if we keep our wits, the record is a true and timely win for Dave W. and Ego Sensation. Martin Bisi and the poster band's mysterious but relevant cool make a great team and deliver one of their least psych yet most mind destroying records to date. Much like the first time you heard Joy Division or early Pigface, for example, you'll experience being startled at first before becoming addicted to the band's unique microcosm of dystopia that is simultaneously corrupting and seducing your ears. - Morgan Y. Evans

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

"...when the history books get written about this era, they'll show that the music community recognized the potential impacts and were strong leaders." An interview with Kevin Erickson of Future of Music Coalition.

Last week, the musician Phil Elverum, a.k.a. Mount Eerie, celebrated the fact that his album A Crow Looked at Me had been ranked #3 on the New York Times' Best of 2017 list. You might expect that high praise from the prestigious newspaper would result in a significant spike in album sales. In a tweet, Elverum divulged that since making the list, he'd sold…six. Six copies.

Under the lens of cultural and historical context, as well as understanding the reflective nature of popular culture, it's hard not to read this film as a cautionary tale about the limitations of isolationism.

I recently spoke to a class full of students about Plato's "Allegory of the Cave". Actually, I mentioned Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" by prefacing that I understood the likelihood that no one had read it. Fortunately, two students had, which brought mild temporary relief. In an effort to close the gap of understanding (perhaps more a canyon or uncanny valley) I made the popular quick comparison between Plato's often cited work and the Wachowski siblings' cinema spectacle, The Matrix. What I didn't anticipate in that moment was complete and utter dissociation observable in collective wide-eyed stares. Example by comparison lost. Not a single student in a class of undergraduates had partaken of The Matrix in all its Dystopic future shock and CGI kung fu technobabble philosophy. My muted response in that moment: Whoa!

Allen Ginsberg and Robert Lowell at St. Mark's Church in New York City, 23 February 1977

Scholar Christopher Grobe crafts a series of individually satisfying case studies, then shows the strong threads between confessional poetry, performance art, and reality television, with stops along the way.

Tracing a thread from Robert Lowell to reality TV seems like an ominous task, and it is one that Christopher Grobe tackles by laying out several intertwining threads. The history of an idea, like confession, is only linear when we want to create a sensible structure, the "one damn thing after the next" that is the standing critique of creating historical accounts. The organization Grobe employs helps sensemaking.