<dick b>
Another use case from the SOAP list indicating that XP may need to support
"Objects" as payloads.
I don't believe XP has a use case for passing objects, should this be
considered a valid use case for XP?
</dick b>
<dave o> Yes, consider it a use-case. </dave o>
Hmm, if you want to consider this a use-case, then you will have to address
the fact that there
is no object model in XP. Given this non-trivial issue, I would suggest that
this not be included
as a use case. It is more appropriate to say that sending 'objects'
(whatever they are :) in XP
messages is an implementation language specific XML serialization issue.
cheers
--oh