AIM

MSN

Website URL

ICQ

Yahoo

Jabber

Skype

Location

Interests

Bellow is a download link to a mp3 file (23 meg) of a recorded chat with Bulla The Rainbow Man. (Many thanks to Onyx for the file and editing)
http://forums.thechaniproject.com/chanipics/bulla.mp3
Below is a quote from Breezy made on the CERN and parallel universe thread http://forums.thechaniproject.com/topic/7819-scientists-at-large-hadron-collider-hope-to-make-contact-with-parallel-universe-in-days/

Scientists can now simulate curved space-time in a lab
Graham Templeton
October 18, 2014
"When discussing quantum physics, you’ll often hear a the phrase “quantum field theory” thrown about. This refers to the general idea that quantum particles are actually just localized excited states of a more general quantum field underlying them — a trippy but mathematically useful idea that interacts with Einstein’s classical conception of space-time in ways that are complex, to say that least. Gravity, so says dogma, is the result of curvature in the ineffable medium of space-time, and modern quantum physics says that curved space-time ought to effect the behavior of a hypothetical quantum field somehow. Precisely how they interact is an open question, and answering that question has been described as the holy grail of physics. It’s currently very difficult to study those interactions in the lab, but that may be about to change.
Curving space-time is very difficult to do, synthetically. It’s easy enough through the classical means — collect a bunch of mass somewhere — but to generate a curve steep enough to have measurable effects on single quantum particles requires densities found only near black holes and the like. Curving space-time in a more direct way, with magnetic fields or “exotic matter,” has been proposed in halls as hallowed as those at NASA — but such technology would allow us to build a literal warp drive, and if mankind had figured that out you’d have read about it here by now. No, instead of figuring out how to actually curve space-time, a German researcher named Nikodem Szpak may have found a loophole that lets us study the effects of curved space-time without having to actually curve it."
snip
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/192311-scientists-can-now-simulate-curved-space-time-in-the-lab?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ziffdavis%2Fextremetech+%28Extremetech%29

When the Soviet probe Luna 3 sent back the first shots of the dark side of the Moon, they showed that it was noticeably more pockmarked by craters than the near side. The nearside crust, by contrast, had more large, shallow basins. More than 50 years after those images first baffled researchers, a study published today in Science explains the observations.
Some theories suggest that the large basins on the near side were caused by impacts from asteroids bigger than those that caused the craters on the far side. But the latest study suggests that the observed basins do not accurately reflect the size of the initial impact, because as asteroids battered the lunar surface in the early history of the Solar System, the Moon's warmer and softer nearside crust melted like butter, producing giant lava flows that filled the impact craters and transformed them into basins
To improve on previous estimates of the size and distribution of basins, the team behind the study used data from NASA’s Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory mission (GRAIL), two satellites that since 2011 have been orbiting the Moon and mapping subtle variations in the strength of its gravitational field. Basins are characterized by thinner crust, says first author Katarina Miljković, a planetary scientist at the Paris Institute of Earth Physics. The team used GRAIL's gravity maps to find such thin crust and measure the true size of the basins.
“We didn’t have to look at topography nearly at all, just at the crust thickness,” says Miljković. The researchers found that although both sides of the Moon had the same total number of impact craters, the near side had eight basins larger than 320 kilometres in diameter, whereas the far side had only one.
Hot hit
The asteroid bombardment should have battered both sides equally, Miljković points out. The asymmetry could have arisen from comparatively small objects punching above their weight on the near side, producing basins more easily than on the far side.
Simulations showed that if the largest dark area on the near side — the plain of volcanic rock known as Oceanus Procellarum — was hundreds of degrees hotter than crust on the far side, impacts there would produce basins up to twice as large as impacts from similar-sized bodies on the far side (see video below).
more at http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=gravity-maps-reveal-why-dark-side-moon-covered-in-craters