Current Law: Utah Code Ann. § 63L-5-101 to -403 (2008)

Enacted: March 19, 2008

63L-5-101. Title.
This chapter is known as the “Utah Religious Land Use Act.”
Renumbered and Amended by Chapter 382, 2008 General Session63L-5-102. Definitions.
As used in this chapter:
(1) “Free exercise of religion” means an act or refusal to act that is substantially motivated by sincere religious belief, whether or not the act or refusal is compulsory or central to a larger system of religious belief, and includes the use, building, or conversion of real property for the purpose of religious exercise.
(2) “Government entity” means the state, a county, a municipality, a higher education institution, a local district, a special service district, any other political subdivision of the state, or any administrative subunit of any of them.
(3) “Land use regulation” means any state or local law or ordinance, whether statutory or otherwise, that limits or restricts a person’s use or development of land or a structure affixed to land.
(4) “Person” means any individual, partnership, corporation, or other legal entity that owns an interest in real property. Renumbered and Amended by Chapter 382, 2008 General Session63L-5-201. Protection of land use as religious exercise.
(1) Except as provided in Subsection (2), a government entity may not impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that imposes a substantial burden on a person’s free exercise of religion.
(2) A government entity may impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that imposes a substantial burden on a person’s free exercise of religion if the government can establish that the imposition of the burden on that person:

(a) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and
(b) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.

(3) A government entity that meets the requirements of Subsection (2) need not separately prove that the remedy and penalty provisions of the land use regulation are the least restrictive means to ensure compliance or to punish the failure to comply.
(4) This act shall not impair the ability of local government to impose costs and fees reasonably necessary to mitigate the off-site impacts of development. Renumbered and Amended by Chapter 382, 2008 General Session63L-5-301. Remedies.
(1) A person whose free exercise of religion has been substantially burdened by a government entity in violation of Section 63L-5-201 may bring an action in the district court of the county where the largest portion of the property subject to the land use regulation is located.
(2) Any person who asserts a claim or defense against a government entity under this chapter may request:

(a) declaratory relief;
(b) temporary or permanent injunctive relief to prevent the threatened or
continued violation; or
(c) a combination of declaratory and injunctive relief.

(3) A person may not bring an action under this chapter against an individual, other than an action against an individual acting in the individual’s official capacity as an officer of a government entity. Renumbered and Amended by Chapter 382, 2008 General Session

63L-5-302. Notice of claim — Government’s right to accommodate.

(1) A person may not bring an action under Section 63L-5-301 unless, 60 days before bringing the action, the person sends written notice of the intent to bring an action.
(2) The notice shall be addressed to the government entity imposing the land use regulation, and shall be prepared and delivered according to the requirements of Subsection 63G-7-401(3).
(3) Mailing of the notice required by Subsection (1) tolls the limitation period for bringing an action under this chapter for a period of 75 days, starting on the day the notice was mailed.
(4) Notwithstanding Subsection (1), a person may bring an action under Section 63L-5-301 before the expiration of the 60-day notice period if:

(a) the imposition of a substantial burden on the person’s free exercise of religion by the land use regulation is imminent; and
(b) the person was not informed of and did not otherwise have knowledge of the land use regulation in time to reasonably provide 60 days notice.

(5)
(a) A government entity provided with the notice required by Subsection (2) may remedy the substantial burden on the person’s free exercise of religion:

(i) before the expiration of the 60-day notice period; or
(ii) in the case of an action properly brought according to Subsection (4), before
the adjudication of a court hearing on the action.

(b) Nothing in this section prevents a government entity from providing a remedy after these time periods.

(6) The court may not award compensatory damages, attorney’s fees, costs, or other expenses to a person if the substantial burden has been cured by a remedy implemented by the government entity according to Subsection (5)(a). Renumbered and Amended by Chapter 382, 2008 General Session63L-5-401. Burden on exercise of religion as defense.
A person whose free exercise of religion has been substantially burdened in violation of this chapter may assert that violation as a defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding without regard to whether the proceeding is brought in the name of the state or by any other person.Renumbered and Amended by Chapter 382, 2008 General Session63L-5-402. Establishment clause unaffected.
(1) This chapter does not authorize government to burden a person’s free exercise of religion.
(2) The protection of religious freedom afforded by this chapter is in addition to the protections provided under federal law and the constitutions of Utah and the United States.
(3) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to affect, interpret, or in any way address that portion of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibiting laws respecting an establishment of religion. Renumbered and Amended by Chapter 382, 2008 General Session63L-5-403. Application to certain cases.
This chapter does not affect and is not intended to affect the authority of government entities to adopt or apply land use regulations that do not involve the free exercise of religion.
Renumbered and Amended by Chapter 382, 2008 General Session

Pending 2015 Religious Freedom Legislation:

1 PROPOSAL TO AMEND UTAH CONSTITUTION —

2 PROTECTION OF RELIGIOUS RIGHTS

3 2015 GENERAL SESSION

4 STATE OF UTAH

5 Chief Sponsor: Jacob L. Anderegg

8 LONG TITLE
9 General Description:
10 This joint resolution of the Legislature proposes to amend the Utah Constitution to
11 enact a provision relating to religious rights.
12 Highlighted Provisions:
13 This resolution proposes to amend the Utah Constitution to:
14 ▸ prevent a religious organization, institution, or entity, or individual acting in a role
15 connected with a religious organization, institution, or entity, from being required or
16 compelled to perform, solemnize, execute, or recognize any rite, ceremony, service,
17 or ordinance that the religious organization, institution, or entity determines to be
18 inconsistent with its tenets, doctrines, or beliefs.
19 Special Clauses:
20 This resolution directs the lieutenant governor to submit this proposal to voters.
21 This resolution provides a contingent effective date of January 1, 2017, for this
22 proposal.
23 Utah Constitution Sections Affected:
24 AMENDS:
25 ARTICLE I, SECTION 4
26

27 Be it resolved by the Legislature of the state of Utah, two-thirds of all members elected to each

28 of the two houses voting in favor thereof:
29 Section 1. It is proposed to amend Utah Constitution, Article I, Section 4, to read:
30 Article I, Section 4.[Religious liberty.]
31 The rights of conscience shall never be infringed. The State shall make no law
32 respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; no religious test
33 shall be required as a qualification for any office of public trust or for any vote at any election;
34 nor shall any person be incompetent as a witness or juror on account of religious belief or the
35 absence thereof. There shall be no union of Church and State, nor shall any church dominate
36 the State or interfere with its functions. No public money or property shall be appropriated for
37 or applied to any religious worship, exercise or instruction, or for the support of any
38 ecclesiastical establishment. No religious organization, institution, or entity, regardless of
39 denomination, and no individual acting in a role connected with a religious organization,
40 institution, or entity, may be required or compelled to perform, solemnize, execute, or
41 recognize any rite, ceremony, service, or ordinance that the religious organization, institution,
42 or entity determines to be inconsistent with its tenets, doctrines, or beliefs.
43 Section 2. Submittal to voters.
44 The lieutenant governor is directed to submit this proposed amendment to the voters of
45 the state at the next regular general election in the manner provided by law.
46 Section 3. Effective date.
47 If the amendment proposed by this joint resolution is approved by a majority of those
48 voting on it at the next regular general election, the amendment shall take effect on January 1,
49 2017.

http://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpg00adminhttp://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpgadmin2015-11-30 23:57:192015-11-30 23:57:19Senator Orrin Hatch, The Wall of Separation Between Church and State Must Come Down, Washington Times

A Davis County judge will determine if an accused child molester is competent for trial. Timothy Butler will be in a Farmington courtroom this afternoon. Butler has told the judge he wants to represent himself in the case, but the judge wants him to get an attorney. From March of 2008 to 2011, prosecutors say […]

A state lawmaker has reportedly drafted a bill that would get Utah out of the marriage business in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court’s historic ruling on same-sex marriage. FOX 13 confirmed through another lawmaker that the bill would end government agencies’ involvement in issuing marriage licenses. The exact language of the bill — […]

Gov. Gary Herbert does not expect Utah lawmakers to try to undermine the new right of gays to marry in Utah, but he says that doesn’t mean they will not try such things as ensuring that churches and clergy won’t be forced to perform marriages. “I look at it more as a positive reinforcement of […]

A new case from Utah provides a surprising early glimpse: a member of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (FLDS) has successfully refused a federal subpoena based on his religious belief in secrecy.

Warning: require_once(/homepages/0/d272215775/htdocs/RFRAperils/wp-content/themes/enfold/footer.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /homepages/0/d272215775/htdocs/RFRAperils/wp-includes/template.php on line 688