To continue reading, subscribe now.

Already have an account or want to create one to read two commentaries for free?
Log in

Support High-Quality Commentary

For more than 25 years, Project Syndicate has been guided by a simple credo: All people deserve access to a broad range of views by the world's foremost leaders and thinkers on the issues, events, and forces shaping their lives. At a time of unprecedented uncertainty, that mission is more important than ever – and we remain committed to fulfilling it.

But there is no doubt that we, like so many other media organizations nowadays, are under growing strain. If you are in a position to support us, please subscribe now.

As a subscriber, you will enjoy unlimited access to our On Point suite of long reads and book reviews, Say More contributor interviews, The Year Ahead magazine, the full PS archive, and much more. You will also directly support our mission of delivering the highest-quality commentary on the world's most pressing issues to as wide an audience as possible.

By helping us to build a truly open world of ideas, every PS subscriber makes a real difference. Thank you.

I don't think it makes sense to speak of subsidies to state-owned companies. The state is simply the investor of such a company. The state's money is just as good as the money that comes from private investors. If a country likes to have state-owned companies (and it definitely makes sense in important industries and areas), that's fine. And as long as they don't dump their products on other markets, it is none of our business how Chinese and other state companies are organized. They don't tell us to nationalize our companies, do they? So who are we to tell others to privatize theirs?!

The EU is a bunch of egoistic, immoral weaklings. They have abandoned Iran and thus contributed to the risk of a war, not to mention the plight of 80 million decent Iranians.

A point to add to your list, though, is the necessary reform of the patent system, which is abused by rich Western and Japanese companies. They file zillions of mini patents in order to make life for independent developers and smaller companies hell as it becomes almost impossible not to violate any patent. Patents should only be allowed for complete inventions, and only last for 5 years.

Another idea is to create an independent, global currency for commodities, let's call it the Com, in order to get rid of the dollar.

Point 5 on your list makes little sense as many of those countries are not on the same level. It is just a sneaky way of trying to allow more advanced countries to dominate less advanced countries who cannot defend themselves. After all, that is also why China protects certain industries until China has its own powerful competitors in the respective areas. And they are right about it. Else China would be dominated by Western companies now. But they recognized that imperialist backdoor and closed it.

Regarding the 2015 climate agreement, we should levy a punitive tax on imports from countries that abandon that agreement as they save a lot of money, which is unfair competition.

I think bolder: the world needs a Eurasian trading zone from Lisbon all the way to Tokyo, including Russia, China etc. This would shift the world's power away from the US.

your initiative is destined to fail from the start unless you do (at a minimum, these are things I can think of) these two things:

1. drop the Paris agreement nonsense. Developing countries need energy to develop and fossil fuels are the only realistic source of energy for them. The global warming theory is a scientific nonsense at best, a tool of radical, anticapitalist left at worst.2. address the imbalance between labor and capital, otherwise known as market fundamentalism. Not all of this imbalance can be easily addressed because of the population growth, but it needs to be put front and center. This is one of the primary reasons for the explosion of so called populism. Generational forgetting is another, but labor-capital imbalance is at least one of the primary contributing factors.

New Comment

It appears that you have not yet updated your first and last name. If you would like to update your name, please do so here.

Pin comment to this paragraph

After posting your comment, you’ll have a ten-minute window to make any edits. Please note that we moderate comments to ensure the conversation remains topically relevant. We appreciate well-informed comments and welcome your criticism and insight. Please be civil and avoid name-calling and ad hominem remarks.

Mass protests over racial injustice, the COVID-19 pandemic, and a sharp economic downturn have plunged the United States into its deepest crisis in decades. Will the public embrace radical, systemic reforms, or will the specter of civil disorder provoke a conservative backlash?

For democratic countries like the United States, the COVID-19 crisis has opened up four possible political and socioeconomic trajectories. But only one path forward leads to a destination that most people would want to reach.

Log in/Register

Please log in or register to continue. Registration is free and requires only your email address.

Emailrequired

PasswordrequiredRemember me?

Please enter your email address and click on the reset-password button. If your email exists in our system, we'll send you an email with a link to reset your password. Please note that the link will expire twenty-four hours after the email is sent. If you can't find this email, please check your spam folder.