=======================

======================================

May 29, 2013

I think there is a bigger story here that will in time come out. The biggest scandal of all, the biggest question is what was the president doing in those eight hours. He had a routine meeting at five o’clock. He never after during the eight hours when our guys have their lives in danger, he never called the Secretary of Defense, he never calls the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, he never called the CIA Director, Who does he call? But five hours in he calls the Secretary of State. And after the phone call she releases a statement essentially about the video and how we denounce any intolerance. It looks as if the only phone call is to construct a cover story at a time when the last two Americans who died were still alive and fighting for their lives. There’s the scandal and that has to be uncovered.”

As you may remember, Clinton said in a statement following the 10:00 pm phone call; “some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation.”

Curiously, the truth that has finally begun to emerge has yet to shed light on the involvement of two other women who almost certainly were players before, during and after the Benghazi attacks.

The first is Valerie Jarrett. She is Mr. Obama’s longtime consigliere. Such is her relationship with him and the first lady that she is permitted to involve herself in virtually all portfolios, including the most sensitive foreign affairs and national security ones. That would surely be the case in this instance in light of Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan’s insightful observation:

“The Obama White House sees every event as a political event . Because of that, it could not tolerate the idea that the armed assault on the Benghazi consulate was a premeditated act of Islamist terrorism. That would carry a whole world of unhappy political implications and demand certain actions. And the American presidential election was only eight weeks away. They wanted this problem to go away, or at least to bleed the meaning from it.”

To rephrase Sen. Howard Baker famous questions from an earlier congressional investigation of a presidential cover-up called Watergate: What did Ms. Jarrett do, and when did she do it?

I think the chances that Obama consulted his “longtime consigliere” at some point between 5:00 and 10:00 are extremely high.

===============================

****Was the Obama Administration gun running to arm the Muslim Brotherhood/Al Qaeda against Assad of Syria? Gun running weapons/munitions from Libya to Turkey to Syria to arm the “freedom fighters” against Assad.

Was Christopher Stevens actually the FIRST Whistleblower about gun running from Benghazi? Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s main objective in Libya was to dethrone Khadafi. WHY? What was the ulterior motive in this?

Did Ambassador Stevens, not getting any help from the WH, call General Petraeus at the CIA? Did General Petraeus call the WH to voice his complaint of no military backup during Benghazi Terrorist Attack? Was General Petraeus blackmailed to keep quiet by the WH using the “scandal” of a mistress as cover?

Was the recent visit to the WH by Turkish Prime Minister a long planned visit or was there a deeper reason for this? Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan knows about everything that happens in Turkey.

WHY is a sitting President of the United States knowingly arming Muslim Brotherhood (Hamas) and Al Qaeda whose history is a hatred of the United States?

========================================

Dialectic Process: The art of deception through brainwashing and lying to promote an agenda.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”