Related

A doctor at a walk-in clinic in southwest Calgary is refusing to prescribe birth control due to her personal beliefs. Chantal Barry of Westglen Medical...

A Calgary physician who is refusing to prescribe birth control to patients at a walk-in clinic in the city’s southwest may not be fulfilling her obligation to patient health, say experts in medical ethics.

“I think this doctor may be, because of her religious attitudes, unable to meet an important range of patients’ health needs,” said Arthur Schafer, director of the Centre for Professional and Applied Ethics at the University of Manitoba, and a former head of the university’s biomedical ethics section.

Not prescribing birth control sends a message “maybe unintentionally, maybe quite intentionally,” that the doctor is unwilling to have important conversations about patients’ sexual and general health, he said.

On Friday, the Herald reported that Dr. Chantal Barry of Westglen Medical Centre does not prescribe birth control due to her personal beliefs. Rather, a sign at the clinic’s front desk informs patients “the physician on duty today will not prescribe the birth control pill” when Barry is on shift and clinic staff provide a list of other clinics where birth control is available. Westglen only has one doctor available for walk-in patients at any given time.

Barry declined a request for comment.

But Dr. Ian Mitchell, a bioethicist with the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary, said Barry’s stance is “worrisome” and could have repercussions reaching far beyond causing inconvenience for patients seeking birth control.

“The first code of ethics is to put the interest of the patient ahead of yourself,” said Mitchell. Physicians should not be required to ignore their personal beliefs, he said, but nor should they allow them to interfere with patient care. While Barry should be commended for her honesty, Mitchell said her stance has the potential to do harm.

For example, women who are on birth control but are seeking medical care for another issue may feel they can’t disclose health issues or concerns related to sexual health or lifestyle for fear of judgment.

Schafer echoed that sentiment, noting it is the responsibility of physicians to initiate conversations about sex and sexual health as an essential tenet of preventive medicine.

“In effect, this doctor is shutting down the possibility of discussion, dialogue and health counselling about sex,” he said. If you’re talking about teenagers or young men and women, that’s a big part of the preventive role of the physician.”

Both Mitchell and Schafer took issue with a response from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, which seemed to downplay the impact Barry’s choice would have on patients. CPSA registrar Trevor Theman told the Herald doctors can refuse to provide medical services based on religious or personal belief as long as they ensure patients have timely access to those services by another practitioner. A delay in providing a birth control prescription is “not likely going to disadvantage a patient in a serious way,” he said, noting “in an ideal world” patients should look to their family physician for birth control.

But Mitchell said that presumes all patients have access to a family physician, when in fact one in five Calgarians, or 200,000 people, do not.

“I might speculate that young women in particular wanting contraception advice might choose (a walk-in clinic) option rather than a family physician they have known since childhood,” he said.

Many newcomers to Calgary also rely on walk-in clinics for primary health care. Amber McKeigan is one of them. The 24-year-old student moved to Calgary from Nova Scotia in 2011 and doesn’t have a family doctor in the city.

“As someone who doesn’t have a family doctor here in Calgary, I depend on the walk-in clinics near my home or work,” she told the Herald in an e-mail.

“If I saw that sign upon walking into a walk-in clinic I would be extremely confused ... and to know that a doctor would refuse to provide birth control based on their personal beliefs is extremely frustrating.”

Progressive Conservative party leadership candidate Jim Prentice told reporters Friday that refusing to provide birth control prescriptions is inconsistent with “the obligations that a doctor has within the public health-care system and so there needs to be an investigation into why that’s happening and we need to deal with it.”

Prentice said he was not aware of the specifics of the case but that “people who practice in the public health system have public obligations to live up to public standards.”

Comments

We encourage all readers to share their views on our articles and blog posts. We are committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion, so we ask you to avoid personal attacks, and please keep your comments relevant and respectful. If you encounter a comment that is abusive, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report spam or abuse. We are using Facebook commenting. Visit our FAQ page for more information.