Cardinal Mahony’s vote in papal conclave stirs ire, shrugs

LOS ANGELES — After the release of damning sex abuse documents that prompted a rare public rebuke from the current … Continued

by Sarah Parvini| Religion News Service

LOS ANGELES — After the release of damning sex abuse documents that prompted a rare public rebuke from the current archbishop of Los Angeles, retired Cardinal Roger Mahony again finds himself in the spotlight — this time over his upcoming vote in the conclave to elect a new pope.

Despite allegations of hiding sexual abuse by priests and then being sidelined by current Archbishop Jose Gomez, Mahony remains a cardinal, a priest “in good standing” and under age 80 — all enough to make him eligible to be one of just 11 American cardinals to hold a vote in next month’s conclave.

“I look forward to traveling to Rome soon to help thank Pope Benedict XVI for his gifted service to the church, and to participate in the Conclave to elect his successor,” Mahony wrote on his personal blog hours after the pope’s stunning resignation announcement.

Others, however, aren’t so excited.

The left-leaning group Catholics United, which has started an online petition objecting to Mahony’s role, said that the retired cardinal “should reexamine his priorities and stay home.”

“Cardinal Mahony should do the right thing and stay home,” the group said. “By putting children in danger, he’s lost his ability to have a voice in the Church.”

In many ways, Mahony finds himself facing the same criticism that was directed at Cardinal Bernard Law, who resigned in disgrace as archbishop of Boston because of the abuse scandal but nonetheless got a vote in the 2005 conclave that elected Benedict.

Tradition says that an archdiocese should not have more than one cardinal-elector at a time, which means Gomez will have to wait to be named a cardinal until after the 76-year-old Mahony loses his vote in 2016.

Gomez called the 14,000 pages of internal church records full of “terribly sad and evil behavior,” and promptly removed Mahony from all “administrative or public duties.” But under church law, cardinals are ultimately answerable only to the pope himself, not the local bishop.

The Washington Post slammed Mahony for protecting known abusers, saying he’s “lucky not to be in prison” and bemoaning that “his continued prominence reflects the culture of impunity in the Catholic Church a decade after its tolerance and complicity in the abuse of children was exposed.”

Manuel Vega, who was abused as an altar boy, told the Los Angeles Times that he couldn’t understand how Mahony could retain a vote in the College of Cardinals.

“Mahony is going without clean hands,” he told the newspaper. “His hands are dirty … from covering up years of sexual abuse. How can he be part of the conclave?”

But across the sprawling archdiocese, Mahony’s vote in the conclave is being greeted by many others with a shrug.

The Rev. Thomas Welbers of the Church of the Good Shepherd in Beverly Hills said Mahony’s position as a member of the conclave is just part of the process — a cardinal is an honorary priest of the diocese of Rome, and he’s allowed to join 116 other cardinals to elect the bishop of Rome, he said.

“Voting rights are not determined by how others may feel about the person,” Welbers said.

Yolanda Moreno, 53, a parishioner at St. Agnes Church in South Los Angeles, said she isn’t bothered by Mahony’s position in the next conclave. God knows best, she said, and Catholics should trust in that.

“He has experience after this scandal,” she said, noting that Mahony’s vote carries as much weight as any other cardinal’s. “Maybe he could help the other cardinals.”

Others were openly supportive of the man who led the nation’s largest archdiocese from 1985 to 2011.

Mike Flota, another parishioner at St. Agnes Church, said he was upset about current controversy surrounding the L.A. diocese. But he puts his trust in God’s hands, and said Mahony is just another sinner in need of forgiveness.

“Nobody is perfect,” Flota, 65, said. “He feels remorse.”

Flota added that Mahony’s life experience and vision as a more liberal cardinal would bring wisdom to the conclave.

The Rev. James Heft, a professor at the University of Southern California, said there is no basis for Mahony to be stripped of his vote; canon law allows that all cardinals under age 80 — even ill cardinals — are required to vote in the papal conclave.

“The scandal weighs heavy on many people,” he said. “But he hasn’t been asked to leave the priesthood. This is his job.”

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, Religion News Service LLC.

“The Washington Post slammed Mahony for protecting known abusers, saying he’s “lucky not to be in prison”-

— Yes and..

Pope Benedict has taken no decisive actions to punish any high ranking church official for enabling, empowering, and covering up sex crimes against innocent kids.

He should fire Cardinal Mahony, for his horrific cover up of sex crimes within LA archdiocese, yet Mahony is still a cardinal and now he can vote for a new pope. This is extremely disturbing.

Thankfully the LAPD and Sheriff dept. is getting involved. It is time for law enforcement to investigate these sex crimes against kids, and to investigate those who shield and cover up these crimes. Until high ranking church officials spend some time behind bars, nothing will change within this secret archaic institution. As long as they can still get away with it, they have no reason to stop.

Children are safest when child predators and those who enable and conceal their crimes are held responsible.

Do you think Roger will be the only one with dirty hands in the conclave?

amelia45

Truth is, I wonder if there would be many cardinals left to vote if every cardinal were excluded who knew of the sexual abuse of a child and failed to act, hid it, denied it, turned their eyes away so they would not witness it, shrugged their shoulders, perhaps in sadness but actionless nevertheless.

I don’t want to excuse Mahony from his responsibility for failing to protect our children. But I don’t want him to become the scapegoat either. I don’t want people to think that having identified Mahony, Law, Rigali, Brady of Ireland, and other bishops and cardinals that the culprits are identified as individual men who failed to act as Jesus would have them act. The real question for Catholics is what is in the culture of the Catholic Church that world-wide they all acted to first protect the priest and almost uniformly cared not at all for the child? What made all these men so blindly obedient and submissive to the institution of the Church that they would so utterly fail the founder of that institution, Jesus himself?

One more point. This is not just a phenomenon of the Catholic Church. The sexual abuse of children has gone on in and out of all kinds of institutions of faith, in families, schools. It did not start in the 1960s and is not some phenomenon that arose out of those wild days; it has gone on for centuries, maybe forever. But it was hidden, secrete – unmentioned and unmentionable – until recently. What we have is not just a failure of our institutions of faith but a failure of governments, police, court systems – all of it. We are working to address it now that we recognize its pervasiveness and the long term harm it does to a child. We need effective laws and awareness of our police and court systems of what this crime entails. We need to teach our children that their bodies are to be respected and how to talk about situations that harm them or make them uncomfortable.