Welcome message

Welcome to my blog. I am honored to have you visit. I hope you'll find my articles a blessing. I welcome your input and especially comments and questions.

I write as a Christian from Jerusalem, Israel about Biblical subjects.

I am particularly interested in the subjects of children, families, women's issues, corporal punishment, science and nature as these subjects relate to the Holy Scriptures.

For more information, see my website: www.biblechild.com

With every good wish - Samuel Martin

Friday, March 07, 2014

Blind acceptance of religious leaders - Do it to your own peril!

Blind acceptance of
religious leaders - Do it to your own peril!

I have to admit that I have not really lived under a system
where the blind acceptance of a religious leader was a major part of my
life.

Oh yes, for the first nine years of my life I lived in a
family where we were members of the World Wide Church of God (WWCG), a total
hierarchically based, top-down dictatorial cult run solely for the good
pleasure and at the whim of the late Herbert W. Armstrong.

Yes, my family were a part of this cult until 1974, so I
guess you could say I was under that system, but from 1965 to 1974, from the
time I was born until we left the WWCG, the sanctity of the WWCG Church and its
Pastor General were now seen in our home as something that our family,
particularly my late father, were becoming more and more uncomfortable
with.

A Roller Coaster Ride

My dad had had his difficulties with Herbert W. Armstrong.
At several times during the period of 1965-1974, my father was ready to resign
and leave the WWCG because of the major disagreements he had with Mr.
Armstrong.

He was told one time by one evangelist that he should not
read the Bible for 10 years during a major disagreement that he had with Mr.
Armstrong. I can remember my father refusing this, but lamenting that the main
criteria for getting along in that denomination seemed to be:

1. Don't think

2. Don't ask any questions

3. Don't propose any new ideas

4. Just blend in and do nothing different from anyone else

5. Only propose ideas that you know the boss will like and
just fit in with what he (always a he seemingly) is teaching.

He hung in there until 1974 when we left. After that time,
my father started into ministry and his first primary readers were the tens of
thousands of people who left the WWCG after Herbert W. Armstrong's prophecies
of the Second Coming of Christ taking place in 1975 (then later 1975)
failed.

Thousands of people were touched by my dad's ministry in
those WWCG circles.

The World Wide Church of God was a church

where blind
acceptance was demanded

When we were in the WWCG, the church leaders told you the
following:

1. What to do

2. What not to do

3. Who to do what they told you to do with

4. When to do anything

5. Why you had to do anything

6. Where you had to do anything

7. How to do anything

Of course, if you were a woman, you had a whole other level
of the above because not only did you have your husband (that is, absolute
master controlling everything you do) in charge of you, you also had the church
leaders in charge of him, which meant that they also were in charge of
you.

Now, as I said, in my former church, blind acceptance was demanded
by the church members. You were a sheep to be fed by the shepherds and mainly
by the top shepherd, the Pastor General himself.

It was totally a one-way system. Information was not exchanged and
learning and growing was NEVER EVER encouraged. Blind obedience, on the other
hand, was not only encouraged, it was demanded.

The only thing that was exchanged was huge sums of money that were
exchanged between the church members and the church leadership, which really
went to address the priorities of one man in the WWCG, the Pastor General.

Doctrinal committees existed in the church, not to promote new
truths or progressive thinking. NEVER! They were there to keep people in toe
and for people to reinforce existing church teaching.

Now, in an environment of blind acceptance of church teachings,
you have no incentive to think for yourself. You just let someone else think
for you.

There is only one problem with this approach. What if that person
is wrong? Or worse yet a false teacher?

This situation demands that you take appropriate action to check
what you are being told and being asked to believe and especially what it is
that God wishes you to do versus what God wishes you not to do.

Now, look at this simple example. I will now refer to a discussion
that my late father had concerning his review of a small evangelical
publication from the UK:

"there are preachers and evangelists who abuse the
contexts within the Bible to apply various teachings to themselves or to those
to whom they minister. Look at how this is done. Once I reviewed a small
publication called "The Little Bible." It was published by an
evangelical group in England who decided to pick what they considered the most
important verse from each biblical book to instruct the child of God in his
daily life. The portion of a verse they picked from Leviticus was

"Do not drink wine nor strong drink" (10:9).

The impression they wanted to leave with the reader was that God didn't want
any of His people to drink wine. But this was an utter perversion of the faith
they were trying to promote. Certainly, the use of too much wine or strong
drinks is wrong, but the publishers failed to tell their readers that the verse
they used pertained only to the priests of ancient Israel (not laymen in
general), and even then it only concerned them "when ye go into the
tabernacle of the congregation" (10:9). The priests were allowed to drink
wine or strong drinks at other times.

Really, the pious Christian publishers of "The
Little Bible" were well aware of the real teaching of Scripture on this
matter, but they falsified the truth by trying to get their readers to think
the command was meant for all Christians at all times. This procedure of taking
teachings out of context is wrong, but it is being used on a wide scale today.

It is important that we do not interweave scriptural
teachings meant for certain peoples at particular times in human history, with
revelations of God meant for others at later times. Though God ordered Abraham
to sacrifice his son, none of us is expected to do the same

thing. The truth is, God has even overthrown previous teachings in favor of
more advanced (spiritual) ones. Only chaos will result when all the disciplines
of the Bible are jumbled together in an attempt to make a homogeneous system.
It is time we should all heed the admonition of Paul and start "rightly
dividing the word of truth" (II Timothy 2:15). The

teachings of the Bible will then begin to make sense." (Ernest L. Martin -
Progressive Revelation in the Bible, Foundation for Biblical Research: Pasadena, CA: 1974)

There is one other thing
that this publication failed to tell their readers. One of my scholar
friends, Dr. Randall Heskett, who many of you will know due to his work against
corporal punishment and my reference to his work in my own, has written a very
important book concerning the history of wine in the Bible.

Now, on an FB discussion, I asked a question on my wall about what
people thought the Bible meant by the use of the phrase: "Strong
Drink".

A number of people said: Liquor, Whiskey, etc. focusing on a
strong drink well above the level of wine in alcoholic intensity.

Randall pointed out that the Hebrew word in question means exactly
"beer."

The point to all of this though is very interesting because of the
publishers of that Little Bible really understood the text to mean "strong
drink" in the hard liquor sense and as Randall also mentioned, liquor or
spirits were probably not even invented until the 1400's.

Now, the clear point to all of this concerns our attitude to
information we receive. Are we just going to accept everything we are told
without checking anything? If we do, we risk being in a situation where we are
letting people who may not only not have the proper knowledge we need to help
us decide spiritual matters for us, but they also may be governed by other priorities which are not accurate
according to the Biblical revelation.

Let us be careful with the information we receive especially in a
religious context. Be prepared to challenge information and look things up.
Things that do not feel right to you, go with those feelings and follow them
up. Check to make sure, if something doesn't feel right.

In closing, keep this text in mind and always check on things to
make sure that they are correct.

Do your best to
present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to
be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth. (2 Timothy 2:15, ESV)

Follow by Email

Followers

About Me

Samuel Martin was born in England and is the youngest child of Dr. Ernest L. and Helen R. Martin, who are both Americans. He lived in the UK for the first 7 years of his life before moving to the USA with his family at age 7. He lived in the USA until 2001 when he married a native Israeli and relocated to live in Jerusalem. He and his wife, Sonia, have 2 daughters.
His experience with biblical scholarship began at an early age. His father initiated a program in conjunction with Hebrew Univ. and Prof. Benjamin Mazar, where over a 5 year period, some 450 college students came to work on an archaeological excavation in Jerusalem starting in 1969. Since that first trip, Samuel has visited Israel on 14 different occasions living more than 5 years of his life in the country. He has toured all areas of Israel as well as worked in several archaeological excavations.
Today, he has begun his academic career publishing 2 books dealing with biblical issues.
I write regularly on biblical subjects with a particular interest in children, families, nature, science and the Bible,and gender in the Biblical context.