We don't have a precedent of womanly contribution in deciding or determining the decisions, or the directions given. Women have to be active. Men have to be active. Gender has to be considered. Out of that, we need to see, hear, understand and have direction, in the same way that, at times, direction is given within a family. The direction speaks to the family need and context; it cannot be a law in its own, because I simply do not work that way, not if you believe that love is greater, higher or more than the Principle.

We are nearly devoid of precedent, because women have not been actively involved, so as to have “Active gender-considered direction.” So, that implies that all direction has to be gender-considered, before it is given. Many husbands and wives already practice this, with an undercurrent in their minds, being, or selves, if not hearts, to speak to them to say, "What would my spouse think about this? Feel? Say? Etc?" However, in the world of religion, political change, dynamic undertaking with God, We have hardly seen it. Instead, we cursed God and Eve. I say that God was cursed, because, essentially, when you are cursing Eve, you are cursing God, especially since I trust her, who she is, what she is, and what and who she can become. We have to Act, and for Me, My ACTIONS have to include men and women. Women and men have to attest to the active gender-based motiff, that is to say, that they attempted to consider gender. Heart rules the less, with God saying, "Oh, really? How much? In what context? For whom? Etc - all the parental constructs." I want this. I want a real family, where all are loved, included, and peace is found in consideration of all, each of which has gender attributes. Part of gender balance is humor for women and humor for men.