I said it once and i'll ******* say it again... poor people shouldn't have children. If you can't take care of yourself then how the **** can you take care of another human? If you revive welfare or any other form of government payment then you should not have a child. In order to receive a welfare check you should be forced onto some form of birth control.

Poor people should have at least one child, and sometimes, they live up to achieve their goals. Sometimes, parents are so caring to a child, they save up money so that they can get an education. The child will live on from there, and become a successful adult with their children, but will always remember that their parents were there for them...

in most developing countries children are a source of income, this is true in some NIC's too, the more kids you have, the more there are to work on the farm/in the local factory. besides, with such undeveloped health care they have to have a lot of kids to guarantee that some of their offspring will grow old and not die young

So you're just making the assumption that two hobos decided to conceive a child? What if they were a happy family once that just fell upon hard times? What then? Give their child up for adoption because they can't afford an Xbox?

If they were able to maintain a position in which they could provide for a kid and then became homeless implies they were in a position to have a kid when they did. If not then they should not have and the counter argument is supported. Nice try Mr. Feels.