Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

Search This Blog

NATO’s war of resources is causing a humanitarian crisis in West Africa

As
millions suffer from hunger, disease, illiteracy and grinding poverty
in the Lake Chad region of West Africa, a sinister game of resource
extraction and exploitation is playing out, with geopolitics at the
heart of it all.

by
Eric Draitser

Part
2 - The shadowy networks behind Boko Haram

Some of the
statistics on the humanitarian situation around Lake Chad are truly
appalling.

According to
the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, there are
at least 2.1 million internally displaced people in the region, as
well as 7.1 million suffering from hunger. One in every two families
need life-saving assistance, according to aid workers. Countless
thousands have been killed, injured or otherwise terrorized by Boko
Haram and other terror groups. The situation is dire.

So when the
UN announced that the conference had raised 672 million dollars to
help the people of the region, the news was obviously welcome. With
such funds come very serious questions about how the funds will be
distributed and who should be responsible for overseeing the
distribution process. But determining the real causes of the crisis
is perhaps the real million-dollar question.

First and
foremost is the question of Boko Haram, its murky origins in Nigerian
political conflicts and the ramifications of its actions in the
region. While definitive knowledge of the group’s sponsorship
remains elusive, there is ample circumstantial evidence to suggest
that elements within Nigeria’s government (and potentially other
regional governments) have been sponsoring the group from its
infancy.

Renowned
hostage negotiator and Boko Haram intermediary Dr. Stephen Davis has
gone on record as saying that high-ranking elements within the
administration of former Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan were
involved, including Ali Modu Sheriff, the former governor of
Nigeria’s Borno State (the heart of the Boko Haram insurgency) and
one of the country’s top military commanders.

The Jonathan
Administration and Nigeria’s military in turn have accused Chad’s
government, led by President Idriss Déby, of fueling the unrest for
geopolitical and strategic reasons. According to these sources, Déby
facilitated the rise of Boko Haram in order to destabilize Nigeria
and take advantage of growing energy extraction from the Lake Chad
Basin.

While the
claim was certainly convenient for a Nigerian government that then
was fending off accusations of its own collusion with Boko Haram, it
does substantiate a 2011 intelligence memo from field officers in
Chad, which noted that “members of Boko Haram sect are sometimes
kept in the Abeche region in Chad and trained before being dispersed.
This happens usually when Mr. Sheriff visits Abeche.”

Though the
details remain murky and may never be fully publicized, even a
conservative assessment would note that the domestic politics of
Nigeria, as well as regional political infighting, facilitated the
emergence of Boko Haram. Indeed, as former President Jonathan’s own
presidential panel investigating Boko Haram noted:

“The
report traced the origin of private militias in Borno State in
particular, of which Boko Haram is an offshoot, to politicians who
set them up in the run-up to the 2003 general elections. The militias
were allegedly armed and used extensively as political thugs. After
the elections and having achieved their primary purpose, the
politicians left the militias to their fate since they could not
continue funding and keeping them employed. With no visible means of
sustenance, some of the militias gravitated towards religious
extremism, the type offered by Mohammed Yusuf [leader of Boko
Haram].”

From its
origins as a collection of gangs used to intimidate people and
influence elections to its later development as a cohesive terror
organization, Boko Haram has been one of the driving forces of the
humanitarian crisis in the region.

Of course,
Boko Haram’s rise would have been impossible without the criminal
U.S.-NATO war on Libya, which not only toppled the Libyan government,
but also led to a tsunami of weapons flowing out of Libya and into
the hands of regional terror groups such as al-Qaeda in the Islamic
Maghreb (AQIM) and the nascent Boko Haram.

In a very
direct way, the U.S.-NATO war birthed the violent conflict we see
today in the region.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

globinfo
freexchange Frequently
- if not always - polls set-up by corporate media aim to track public
opinion on a specific issue. The results could be used by the deep
state apparatus in order to justify an action, or, figure out how to
handle a negative trend for the deep state agenda. Of
course, the question could be set-up in a very simplified and
convenient manner, so that the results could be translated
accordingly. Yet, the
results from the following MSNBC
poll on Julian Assange are so devastating for the
deep state planning that leave little room for any misconception and
manipulation. Specifically,
you have two options to answer the following question: “Should
Julian Assange be prosecuted for his involvement in WikiLeaks?” The
first option is to answer that "Yes, he is a criminal." The
second option is to answer that "No, he is a whistleblower
and deserves protection." At the
time we checked out the results, the second answer prevailed
overwhelmingly with 95% (~1…

by
system failure Donald
Trump and his bloodthirsty warhawks are about to break the record of
failed attempted coups against a single country. Concerning Latin
America, the US imperialists were setting the desirable conditions
for their corporate beasts usually by overthrowing governments and
supporting military dictatorships. But
Trump himself has already broken another record. The record of not
keeping his promises to the American people - every one of them. The
'anti-interventionist', 'anti-establishment' Trump, has already
started a war against Venezuela, which so far includes brutal
economic sanctions, sabotage operations, attempted coups. Trump not
only does whatever he can in order to satisfy the US
neocon/neoliberal establishment and the deep state, but especially in
the case of Venezuela, he follows the obsolete CIA playbook to the
letter. So,
after a series of failed orchestrated coups, Trump's warhawks
attempted to start a civil war in Venezuela by mobiliz…

globinfo freexchange
Former US Chief of Staff for Secretary of State, Lawrence Wilkerson, spoke with Sharmini Peries of the Real News about Trump's plans for a potential US military action against Venezuela.

As he pointed out:
Elliott Abrams, Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, and the administration’s approach to Venezuela, is as if they were Panama or they were Honduras. They are not. They’re very professional. That puts them above Argentina, above Chile, whose militaries are quite competent, too.
Mr. Trump ought to be very, very careful about saying he’s going to send marines or soldiers to Venezuela because the Venezuelan military will be unified immediately. It will take to the hills and it will fight as the Vietnamese did during the Vietnam War, and as the Taliban are in Afghanistan right now: to the last marine, to the last soldier.
Putin is a smart man, probably told Trump 'you don’t want to get involved in those jungles. You don’t want to get involved in those mountains. You …

globinfo
freexchange Plenty
of propaganda is manufactured by the US deep state apparatus to push
for the imperialist agenda. Yet, some elements of the propaganda
machine are still unable to realize that independent truth seekers
and real journalists are watching, and therefore, these elements
could be easily exposed. Sloppy
efforts immediately backfire in social media and the Internet. Most
recent sloppy efforts are related to Gaza and Venezuela. As the
Newsweekreported: Senior
2020 Trump campaign adviser Katrina Pierson used a 2015 video
showing a Ukrainian rocket launch alongside comments about this
weekend's deadly attacks between Israel and Gaza militants and a
condemnation of congresswoman Ilhan Omar. Pierson,
who was Donald Trump's 2016 campaign spokesperson and is a
frequent cable news guest, shared the video—which was first
posted online in 2015 and reportedly shows Ukraine launching
dozens of rockets at Russian-backed separatists—on Sunday. Alongsi…

globinfo freexchange
Outside of an Alexandria, Virginia courtroom, Chelsea Manning explained to reporters why she would refuse to testify before a second grand jury investigating Wikileaks' Julian Assange, and as a result, face jail time once again. On May 9, Manning was released from jail because the term of the last grand jury she refused to testify before expired. She was immediately subpoenaed once again—for May 16.
Her following words clearly depict that Chelsea Manning is a person with strong and solid principles and a real hero: I will not cooperate with this or any other grand jury, so it doesn’t matter what it is, or what the case is. I’m just not going to comply or cooperate. Facing jail again, potentially today, doesn’t change my stance. The prosecutors are deliberately placing me in an impossible position: go to jail and face the prospect of being held in contempt again, or, in the alternative, foregoing my principles, the strong positions that I have, that I hold dear…

...
and the liberal centrists must be really pissed offglobinfo
freexchange It was
epic indeed. The moment where the crowd inside the Fox ultra-right
nest enthusiastically cheers in favor of a government-run healthcare
system, could actually be considered a historical moment, thanks to
Bernie Sanders. The
moment clearly depicts and officially marks the end of controlled
audiences in controlled MSM environments. It shows that the well-paid
MSM pundits and their producers are finding increasingly difficult to
set up the scene according to the desirable agenda. Therefore,
audience reactions can't be directed, or predicted in many cases by
the MSM 'experts'. The
shock for the MSM tools was inevitable. It shows that they are now
completely detached from the ordinary people and their problems. But the
whole thing highlighted something even more fundamental. It was another
loud evidence for the fact that the BS neoliberal narratives don't
work anymore. And even
more remarkably, th…

As we wrote recently, the moment where the crowd inside the Fox ultra-right nest enthusiastically cheers in favor of a government-run healthcare system, could actually be considered a historical moment, thanks to Bernie Sanders.

The moment clearly depicts and officially marks the end of controlled audiences in controlled MSM environments. It shows that the well-paid MSM pundits and their producers are finding increasingly difficult to set up the scene according to the desirable agenda. Therefore, audience reactions can't be directed, or predicted in many cases by the MSM 'experts'.
Now, here is an example showing a successful set up through a controlled audience. It took place inside CNN and there is plenty of evidence that was indeed carefully set up. In the following video, Mike Figueredo of the Humanist Report felt optimistic, but also quite frustrated at the same time. Figueredo's reaction …

The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has begun responding to queries by the press about a leaked document which contradicts official OPCW findings on an alleged chemical weapons attack last year in Douma, Syria. The prepared statement they’ve been using in response to these queries confirms the authenticity of the document.
To recap, a few days ago the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media (WGSPM) published a document signed by a man named Ian Henderson, whose name is seen listed in expert leadership positions on OPCW documents from as far back as 1998 and as recently as 2018. It’s unknown who leaked the document and what other media organizations they may have tried to send it to. The report picks apart the extremely shaky physics and narratives of the official OPCW analysis on the gas cylinders allegedly dropped from Syrian government aircraft in the Douma attack, and concludes that “The dimensions, characteristics and appearance of the cylinders, a…

In this episode of RT's Going Underground, former MP and author of A Very British Coup and The Friends of Harry Perkins, Chris Mullin, spoke about the history of MI5 and MI6 meddling in UK politics against Labour Party leaders. He also estimated whether a British coup is underway against Jeremy Corbyn.
The story of A Very British Coup was set in the 1980s when there was speculation about the possibility of a government led by someone like Tony Benn and the establishment conspired to bring it down. The establishment in this case being a sort of mixture of the security and intelligence services, the media barons, with a little help from the Americans.
Tony Benn looked likely to become deputy leader of the Labour Party which at the time was strongly challenging the government of Margaret Thatcher in the opinion polls. Persistent rumours circulated over the years about attempts by members of the British security services, and other wings of the British Establish…

With
Juan Guaidó’s parallel government attempting to take power with
the backing of the U.S., it is telling that the top political donors
of those in the U.S. most fervently pushing regime change in
Venezuela have close ties to Monsanto and major financial stakes in
Bayer.by
Whitney Webb Part
4 - Why is a top to Marco Rubio increasing his stake in Bayer while
others flee? Yet, it
is AEI’s top individual donor noted in the accidental “schedule
of contributors” disclosure who is most telling about the private
biotech interests guiding the Trump administration’s Venezuela
policy. Paul Singer, the controversial billionaire hedge fund
manager, has long been a major donor to neoconservative and Zionist
causes — helping fund the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), the
successor to the Project for a New American Century (PNAC); and the
neoconservative and islamophobic Foundation for the Defense of
Democracies (FDD), in addition to the AEI. Singer
is notably one of the top political donors to Senat…