Even before it was rolled out, Democrats graded the grading system. They’ve since proposed a vague alternative to it. Republicans have graded the Democrats’ proposed system. And at least at one school, students have come up with their own grading system to counter LePage’s system.

An April 11 news release from Senate Democrats spokeswoman Ericka Dodge was headlined: “A-F Grading System Gets ‘F’ From Democrats.”

On Wednesday, Democrats rolled out the idea of their alternative, saying a stakeholder group will determine what would be figured into the formula.

On Friday, the Maine Republican Party posted an outline of the Democrats’ proposal marked up in red, giving it a C- . On Twitter, House Republican spokesman David Sorensen called that grade “generous if you ask me.”

The Kennebec Journal reported Thursday that the student council at Cony High School in Augusta, upset over a C grade from the state, came up with its own grading system.

Not surprisingly, it was more favorable than the state’s portrait of the school, giving it an A- grade or higher in six of 10 areas, which included student/staff relationships, athletics and diversity.

It didn’t include performance, which the LePage administration’s system is almost wholly based on, factoring in standardized test scores in math and English, students’ growth and progress, and graduation rates for high schools.

Critics have said it skews toward wealthier schools and since it’s graded on a bell curve, grades relate only to themselves. Education Commissioner Stephen Bowen has said he wanted to hold all schools to one standard, and the bell curve was used to set a baseline for the first year’s grades.

‘PAY PEOPLE TO GET SICK?’

A LePage bill that would direct the state to seek federal approval to allow Maine to bar food-stamp recipients from buying soft drinks and junk food was dealt a blow in a legislative committee Thursday.

The Health and Human Services Committee voted 8-5 to recommend the bill not pass. Proponents of the bill argued that the taxpayer-funded program shouldn’t be used to purchase foods that could cause health problems. Opponents said there’s no evidence there are health benefits from prohibiting certain food choices.

That, along with the breakdown of the committee vote, suggests the bill should still motivate a hearty debate when it hits the House and Senate floors, as the bill rallies both certain fiscal hawks and the health-minded.

“I am shaking my head over this disappointing vote,” Katz said in a prepared statement Friday. “We know obesity causes huge health issues. Why would we want to pay people to get sick?”

INVESTIGATION SEASON

It’s been a relatively slow session for the Legislature’s watchdog arm, the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability.

But the Government Oversight Committee, which directs the office, made a notable move Friday by deciding to launch an immediate investigation into questions of impropriety at the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention after allegations were made about program funding being distributed unfairly and about demands that documents be illegally shredded.

The allegations surfaced in a complaint to the Maine Human Rights Commission by Sharon Leahy-Lind, director of the CDC’s Division of Local Public Health. She said she was assaulted after she refused to destroy certain documents related to scoring results for 27 Healthy Maine Partnerships, which she alleged were skewed to take funding from a Lewiston organization.

Also on Friday, the Government Oversight Committee decided to postpone an investigation into allegations that LePage pressured unemployment hearings officers to make more pro-business decisions, which the governor’s office has denied.

The committee said it would wait until a federal investigation into the matter concludes before directing the office to investigate.

ABORTION BILLS ON AGENDA

Two long-shot bills that would impede access to abortion in Maine are scheduled to be heard by a legislative committee Friday.

One, sponsored by Rep. Eleanor Espling, R-New Gloucester, would mandate “informed consent” before an abortion is performed. Before giving consent, a woman must be told “the number of weeks elapsed from the time of conception, the risks associated with the abortion and, at the woman’s request, alternatives to abortion,” the bill says.

The other bill, sponsored by Rep. Paul Davis, R-Sangerville, would require the “written consent of a parent or legal guardian before an abortion may be performed on a minor or an incapacitated person.”

Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Amy Volk, R-Scarborough, would allow for a wrongful death suit in the death of an unborn viable fetus past 12 weeks old. However, a legal abortion would exempt a mother and abortion provider from being sued by the fetus’s estate.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Maine will oppose all three bills, calling them “anti-choice.”

“All healthcare decisions should be between a woman and her doctor — not between a woman, her doctor, and legislators in Augusta,” said Sen. Emily Cain, D-Orono, in an ACLU statement. “Women can be trusted to make the decisions that are best for them, and their families. These bills send the wrong message to women across Maine.”

The bills should be boosted by pro-life groups. In an email Thursday, Carroll Conley, executive director of the Christian Civic League, called the bills “critical” and “based upon common sense and common ground.”

State House Bureau Writer Michael Shepherd can be contacted at 370-7652 or at:

Here at MaineToday Media we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion.

To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use. Click here to flag and report a comment that violates our terms of use.