Ducey signs opioids package, defends speed of passage

Gov. Doug Ducey looks up at the gallery of the Old Capitol where elementary school children watched as he signed the opioid omnibus on Jan. 26. (Photo by Katie Campbell/Arizona Capitol Times)

Saying there is a crisis, Gov. Doug Ducey on Friday defended demanding that lawmakers review and adopt multiple changes in Arizona drug laws in just three days.

The comments, on the heels of the governor signing the measure, come less than 24 hours after state lawmakers gave the package unanimous approval despite what several said are serious concerns and misgivings about what it contains. Several also questioned the need for the rush, given that key provisions — including limits on the amount of opioids doctors can prescribe — do not take effect for another 11 months.

“We have confidence in this bill,” Ducey said. And he argued that “there was no rush.”

“We’ve been working on this bill since September,” he said. And the governor said there is a crisis, citing the death of more than 800 Arizonans between June and the beginning of this year of suspected opioid overdoses, more than 5,000 overdoses and more than 450 babies born addicted to opioids.

“This bill is about people who are dying, people who are overdosing, people that are becoming addicted,” he said.

But most lawmakers, not involved in the drafting, saw the first version of the measure when it hit their desks Monday night.

“I am someone who believes in our process,” Ducey said. “So if we do need to come back and have changes, I’m right there and we have a sitting legislature.”

One key provision of the measure limits initial prescriptions to no more than five days — 14 for post-surgical patients — with an absolute dosage of no more than 90 “morphine milligram equivalents” unless they fall into certain excepted categories like burn victims, cancer patients and those in hospice.

Doctors who say their patients need more must first get approval from a board-certified pain management specialist.

Lawmakers added language late Thursday allowing that consultation to be by phone. But Sen. Kimberly Yee, R-Phoenix, said she doubts that doctors will be willing to risk the liability for giving the go-ahead for large dosages through a simple phone consult.

“You want to see that patient face-to-face,” she said. And Yee openly worried about how long it might take to get an appointment.

A last-minute amendment does allow the patient’s doctor to exceed the 90 MME if a specialist is not available within 48 hours.

But even that left some lawmakers unsatisfied.

“Here is a doctor who’s practice for years, known that patient, and now they have to get a second opinion,” complained Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake. Others questioned whether putting new requirements on “good” doctors will impair those who are less careful about the prescriptions they write.

And other lawmakers said there are unanswered questions about the cost and availability to doctors of software who will have to comply with a new requirement that all prescriptions be transmitted electronically to pharmacies rather than on paper.

Ducey, for his part, defended the plan.

“We think this is the right package, that it’s thorough, thoughtful, aggressive, more so than any other legislation that’s been introduced at the Capitol for years,” the governor said.

House Speaker J.D. Mesnard said the plan recognizes that opioid addiction is different than those hooked on other drugs. And central to that is that most never intended to get addicted.

“They went to the ER, they went to the doctor, dealing with an issue,” he told colleagues during Thursday’s nights vote.

He said they get a prescription, go home, use it, “and suddenly there’s an addiction.”

Mesnard said he understands the problem on a personal level, detailing having to go to the emergency room last year for a “lower back issue I’ll probably be dealing with for the rest of my life.” The doctor gave him a prescription for opioids, telling him to take one or two.

“I took one, didn’t really feel anything,” Mesnard said.

“Took two, I felt it,” he continued. “And I could definitely see why people become addicted.”

Ducey, after signing the bill, predicted it will result in a big reduction in opioid addiction.

“While we have an opioid epidemic issue today, I believe we’ll solve this, just like we’ve solved methamphetamine and crack cocaine,” Ducey said.

Moments later, however, the governor denied he ever said the problems have been solved.

“I didn’t say that,” he said.

“I said we addressed those issues,” the governor continued. “They are not the epidemics that they were.”

2 comments

Great, more government involvement in patient healthcare. Look at the deaths. It’s not prescriptions that are causing them. It’s fentanyl. Meanwhile chronic pain patients are being refused pain relief because of this opioiphobia.

Here’s a few facts:
0.6% of opioid naive post-surgical patients were tagged as “abusing” opioids
Fentanyl deaths have skyrocketed since prescriptions were dropped. For example, fentanyl was involved in 75% of ALL drug overdoses in New Hampshire in 2017 as of November.

And for the Capitol Times – babies cannot be “addicted”. They are “dependent”.

I agree with Chris,you are not solving anything,what you are falling to say here,is that most of these death ,are a result of people mixing drugs..These are not your average patients,these are people that have already become addicted to other drugs.By restricting the pain pills to those that use them,you will create a bigger drug problem,people that are controlling their pain and not having to live with it every day,are going to do what they would have never done,go to the street and find anything for the pain You solved nothing and created a bigger problem than you know.