A bid to create a The Only Way is Essex-style reality show in Watford could set the town’s reputation back years, the elected mayor has warned.

Dorothy Thornhill said she had worked the last decade to stop the town being "the butt of jokes" and was not pleased at prospect of We Are Watford making onto the nation’s TV screens.

However the people behind the show, which auditioning for cast members, insisted it will be "fun" and "family orientated" affair.

The show hopes to follow in the successful footsteps of other scripted reality series such as Made in Chelsea, which is are essentially soap operas based around real people.

Mayor Thornhill said: "They would undo in one fell swoop 10 years of my work. I have spent 10 years trying to turn [around] a town where people thought we were a joke, and the butt of people’s jokes, because whatever bad you want to find in a place you’ll find it.

"Watford is a microcosm of the whole country - all life is here. And if they are looking for bad and negativity, they’ll search until they find it. It won’t be a true and accurate reflection of our town. And it will set back all the work we have done promoting Watford in one reality TV show. [To say I am] disappointed would be an understatement."

This week Helen Crook, We Are Watford spokesman, said the show would be "family orientated" rather than seek to offend people.

She distanced We Are Watford from more salacious and trashy series such as Geordie Shore.

He said: "We are not looking to do it like Geordie Shore. We are focusing on the fun element. If footage contains bits that are not appropriate or are likely to offend people - stuff that might happen on a night out - we would take that out the programme.

Scene from Geordie Shore.

Creators say We Are Watford will not be like Geordie Shore

"We’re making it more family orientated. It will include people drinking and arguments, but mostly we’re just looking to show normal everyday life."

Ms Crook said the programme would start filming in January next year, with filming locations set to include Watford, Kings Langley, Abbots Langley, Radlett and Bushey.

Auditions for the cast will begin at the end of the month in Watford nightclub Cameo to find a cast of about 30 18-20-year-olds to star in the town’s answer to reality hits Made In Chelsea and The Only Way is Essex.

One applicant told the Watford Observer would promote the town as a fun and safe place to live and boost its economy by attracting people to the area.

Cassiobury resident, Sonya Ahmed, 26, said: "If they do it like The Only Way Is Essex, I think this show will improve Watford’s reputation.

"And it will bring people to the area - fresh faces, new boys.

"There’s been a bit of a slump in Watford businesses and I think this will really help draw more people in.

"And with all the redevelopment - it’s a big year for Watford next year.

"I want people to know how amazing Watford is."

On why she want to take part, Sonya added: "Everyone else has always told me to do it. I have drama in my life every week - it follows me, or I walk into it. I thought this is what they might be looking for."

So not a show about families at all. And obviously only 18-20 year olds "have fun". I know what kind of fun they have, and it's neither my kind of fun or, indeed, anything I would even call fun. No doubt it involves getting drunk, larking about in a state of semi-undress and bowking the old rich brown into people's hedges!

"And it will bring people to the area - fresh faces, new boys."
Confirmed then. I know what's on your mind. Watford's well known for its meat market - it's why we used to have a double step along the high street, you know, for droving cattle up there without getting sh** on your shoes.

"boost its economy by attracting people to the area." Yep, the wrong kind of people.

"...I have drama in my life every week - it follows me, or I walk into it..."" Yeah, so do I -I'm regularly getting police deal with an errant but I don't want to air my laundry on national TV (or even local newspaper). Why, in the name of all that's Holy, would anyone want that? Or even want to watch that?

But as elmo75 says... if it annoys Dotty, it can't be all bad!

"a cast of about 30 18-20-year-olds to star"
So not a show about families at all. And obviously only 18-20 year olds "have fun". I know what kind of fun they have, and it's neither my kind of fun or, indeed, anything I would even call fun. No doubt it involves getting drunk, larking about in a state of semi-undress and bowking the old rich brown into people's hedges!
"And it will bring people to the area - fresh faces, new boys."
Confirmed then. I know what's on your mind. Watford's well known for its meat market - it's why we used to have a double step along the high street, you know, for droving cattle up there without getting sh** on your shoes.
"boost its economy by attracting people to the area." Yep, the wrong kind of people.
"...I have drama in my life every week - it follows me, or I walk into it..."" Yeah, so do I -I'm regularly getting [...] police [...] deal with an errant [...] but I don't want to air my laundry on national TV (or even local newspaper). Why, in the name of all that's Holy, would anyone want that? Or even want to watch that?
But as elmo75 says... if it annoys Dotty, it can't be all bad!TRT

Well, she is right this time, Watford WILL become a butt of jokes. And if this Town has any backbone it will ban it!

As for me, i will do and say anything controversial, lose my manners and morals for a bit of fame - so i will be auditioning! Stuff society and the kids it influences..... stardom awaits!

Well, she is right this time, Watford WILL become a butt of jokes. And if this Town has any backbone it will ban it!
As for me, i will do and say anything controversial, lose my manners and morals for a bit of fame - so i will be auditioning! Stuff society and the kids it influences..... stardom awaits!G_Whiz

Undoing 10 years of her work? Does that include
a) hundreds of drunken individuals in the high street after midnight
b) running down a good market
c) trying to sell allotments to property developers
d) allowing building on flood plain land
e) spending millions on paving and a bridge over the pond
Well thats five reasons that iwatford has gone downhill !bishopofwatford

bishopofwatford wrote:
Undoing 10 years of her work? Does that include

a) hundreds of drunken individuals in the high street after midnight

b) running down a good market

c) trying to sell allotments to property developers

d) allowing building on flood plain land

e) spending millions on paving and a bridge over the pond

Well thats five reasons that iwatford has gone downhill !

Dorothy Downhill.

[quote][p][bold]bishopofwatford[/bold] wrote:
Undoing 10 years of her work? Does that include
a) hundreds of drunken individuals in the high street after midnight
b) running down a good market
c) trying to sell allotments to property developers
d) allowing building on flood plain land
e) spending millions on paving and a bridge over the pond
Well thats five reasons that iwatford has gone downhill ![/p][/quote]Dorothy Downhill.TRT

These programmes are awful. I saw an episode of a welsh version recently called "The Valleys" and it was dire.
Away from the political knock about, there are some serious players who are involved in investing in Watford and the last thing any Council, of whatever political colour, wants is this kind of publicity putting them off.
P.s. to be fair, add two new leisure centres into the last 12 years. The building on the flood plain and conversion of the parade into a vertical drinking paradise also happened a few years before the current mayor was in post.

These programmes are awful. I saw an episode of a welsh version recently called "The Valleys" and it was dire.
Away from the political knock about, there are some serious players who are involved in investing in Watford and the last thing any Council, of whatever political colour, wants is this kind of publicity putting them off.
P.s. to be fair, add two new leisure centres into the last 12 years. The building on the flood plain and conversion of the parade into a vertical drinking paradise also happened a few years before the current mayor was in post.Andy Wylie

Andy Wylie wrote:
These programmes are awful. I saw an episode of a welsh version recently called &quot;The Valleys" and it was dire.
Away from the political knock about, there are some serious players who are involved in investing in Watford and the last thing any Council, of whatever political colour, wants is this kind of publicity putting them off.
P.s. to be fair, add two new leisure centres into the last 12 years. The building on the flood plain and conversion of the parade into a vertical drinking paradise also happened a few years before the current mayor was in post.

Two new leisure centres ...? I know where one is. , the other was just upgraded. So are you telling me that no alcohol selling licenses were
approved whilst she was mayor? For that matter planning permission for
the new access to the" health campus" didnt involve traversing a flood plain!

Pull the other one, its got bells on!

[quote][p][bold]Andy Wylie[/bold] wrote:
These programmes are awful. I saw an episode of a welsh version recently called "The Valleys" and it was dire.
Away from the political knock about, there are some serious players who are involved in investing in Watford and the last thing any Council, of whatever political colour, wants is this kind of publicity putting them off.
P.s. to be fair, add two new leisure centres into the last 12 years. The building on the flood plain and conversion of the parade into a vertical drinking paradise also happened a few years before the current mayor was in post.[/p][/quote]Two new leisure centres ...? I know where one is. , the other was just upgraded. So are you telling me that no alcohol selling licenses were
approved whilst she was mayor? For that matter planning permission for
the new access to the" health campus" didnt involve traversing a flood plain!
Pull the other one, its got bells on!bishopofwatford

Upgraded, it was taken right back to the steel! Flood plains have been fair game for development since the 1990's thanks to the then Government although we all had a good laugh when the hotel in Water Lane, which all parties thought was a bad idea and got permission on appeal, flooded before it even opened!
You now have to properly show what you are doing with any flood plain in any redevelopment plan that involves one and that is no bad thing.

Upgraded, it was taken right back to the steel! Flood plains have been fair game for development since the 1990's thanks to the then Government although we all had a good laugh when the hotel in Water Lane, which all parties thought was a bad idea and got permission on appeal, flooded before it even opened!
You now have to properly show what you are doing with any flood plain in any redevelopment plan that involves one and that is no bad thing.Andy Wylie

Andy Wylie wrote:
Upgraded, it was taken right back to the steel! Flood plains have been fair game for development since the 1990's thanks to the then Government although we all had a good laugh when the hotel in Water Lane, which all parties thought was a bad idea and got permission on appeal, flooded before it even opened!
You now have to properly show what you are doing with any flood plain in any redevelopment plan that involves one and that is no bad thing.

I notice you dont dispute the granting of more and more alcohol licenses
both on and off the premises.........may
be you think Watford is a better place
with drunken individuals urinating in the streets and gardens as well as cloggging up A and E at the hospital!

You might like that idea . I do not!

[quote][p][bold]Andy Wylie[/bold] wrote:
Upgraded, it was taken right back to the steel! Flood plains have been fair game for development since the 1990's thanks to the then Government although we all had a good laugh when the hotel in Water Lane, which all parties thought was a bad idea and got permission on appeal, flooded before it even opened!
You now have to properly show what you are doing with any flood plain in any redevelopment plan that involves one and that is no bad thing.[/p][/quote]I notice you dont dispute the granting of more and more alcohol licenses
both on and off the premises.........may
be you think Watford is a better place
with drunken individuals urinating in the streets and gardens as well as cloggging up A and E at the hospital!
You might like that idea . I do not!bishopofwatford

No accetance, I just hadn't got to that bit. Once you designate an area for an activity like clubbing, you can't just say "enough" when it suits you. That was the problem both the Labour and this LD council, in it's early years faced. Unless the police objected, how do you turn it down? You didn't have the absolute right to do so because the legal presumption was on accepting the application.
Fortunately sanity at Government level seems to have prevailed in recent years (going back to late Labour days) and councils now have more powers to act but they still cannot take away licences because they feel there are too many.

No accetance, I just hadn't got to that bit. Once you designate an area for an activity like clubbing, you can't just say "enough" when it suits you. That was the problem both the Labour and this LD council, in it's early years faced. Unless the police objected, how do you turn it down? You didn't have the absolute right to do so because the legal presumption was on accepting the application.
Fortunately sanity at Government level seems to have prevailed in recent years (going back to late Labour days) and councils now have more powers to act but they still cannot take away licences because they feel there are too many.Andy Wylie

Andy Wylie wrote:
No accetance, I just hadn't got to that bit. Once you designate an area for an activity like clubbing, you can't just say &quot;enough" when it suits you. That was the problem both the Labour and this LD council, in it's early years faced. Unless the police objected, how do you turn it down? You didn't have the absolute right to do so because the legal presumption was on accepting the application.
Fortunately sanity at Government level seems to have prevailed in recent years (going back to late Labour days) and councils now have more powers to act but they still cannot take away licences because they feel there are too many.

Presume = assume

All that does if you follow that break it down. **** -u- me it makes an **** out
Of you and me.

To coin another phrase " the law is an ****" so those presuming are guilty
Of inflicting us the council tax payers of watford with no go areas after
Certain times .

You might like idea ...do you live anywhere near these clubs?

[quote][p][bold]Andy Wylie[/bold] wrote:
No accetance, I just hadn't got to that bit. Once you designate an area for an activity like clubbing, you can't just say "enough" when it suits you. That was the problem both the Labour and this LD council, in it's early years faced. Unless the police objected, how do you turn it down? You didn't have the absolute right to do so because the legal presumption was on accepting the application.
Fortunately sanity at Government level seems to have prevailed in recent years (going back to late Labour days) and councils now have more powers to act but they still cannot take away licences because they feel there are too many.[/p][/quote]Presume = assume
All that does if you follow that break it down. **** -u- me it makes an **** out
Of you and me.
To coin another phrase " the law is an ****" so those presuming are guilty
Of inflicting us the council tax payers of watford with no go areas after
Certain times .
You might like idea ...do you live anywhere near these clubs?bishopofwatford

Andy Wylie wrote:
No accetance, I just hadn't got to that bit. Once you designate an area for an activity like clubbing, you can't just say &quot;enough" when it suits you. That was the problem both the Labour and this LD council, in it's early years faced. Unless the police objected, how do you turn it down? You didn't have the absolute right to do so because the legal presumption was on accepting the application.
Fortunately sanity at Government level seems to have prevailed in recent years (going back to late Labour days) and councils now have more powers to act but they still cannot take away licences because they feel there are too many.

Presume = assume

All that does if you follow that break it down. **** -u- me it makes an **** out
Of you and me.

To coin another phrase " the law is an ****" so those presuming are guilty
Of inflicting us the council tax payers of watford with no go areas after
Certain times .

You might like idea ...do you live anywhere near these clubs?

[quote][p][bold]Andy Wylie[/bold] wrote:
No accetance, I just hadn't got to that bit. Once you designate an area for an activity like clubbing, you can't just say "enough" when it suits you. That was the problem both the Labour and this LD council, in it's early years faced. Unless the police objected, how do you turn it down? You didn't have the absolute right to do so because the legal presumption was on accepting the application.
Fortunately sanity at Government level seems to have prevailed in recent years (going back to late Labour days) and councils now have more powers to act but they still cannot take away licences because they feel there are too many.[/p][/quote]Presume = assume
All that does if you follow that break it down. **** -u- me it makes an **** out
Of you and me.
To coin another phrase " the law is an ****" so those presuming are guilty
Of inflicting us the council tax payers of watford with no go areas after
Certain times .
You might like idea ...do you live anywhere near these clubs?bishopofwatford

Yes, I do actually and have to walk across that area going home from or to work, sometimes at night when all the mayhem is going on. It is less intense now than, say, a decade ago but it is still a bit lively.
I would like to see Councils able to control the number of licences premises within a certain measured area.

Yes, I do actually and have to walk across that area going home from or to work, sometimes at night when all the mayhem is going on. It is less intense now than, say, a decade ago but it is still a bit lively.
I would like to see Councils able to control the number of licences premises within a certain measured area.Andy Wylie

I often think John Logie Baird, the inventor of television, must be turning in his grave if he could see what his marvellous invention has become!

The people who make so-called reality television are parasites and a disgrace to their profession and the idiots who take part in these programmes are simply attention-seeking cretins and wanna-be-famous idiots. The simple fact is that reality television is CHEAP television because it turns members of the public into the cast, so they don't have to pay proper actors or spend money on real drama programmes.

The sort of people who will be queueing up to take part in this show will be pathetic little nobodies like Sonya-whatever-her-n
ame-is who wants to be famous. When she says "I have drama in my life every week" perhaps she should either sign up for drama school and learn how to become a serious actress or talk to a psychiatrist about how to become a normal person.

I often think John Logie Baird, the inventor of television, must be turning in his grave if he could see what his marvellous invention has become!
The people who make so-called reality television are parasites and a disgrace to their profession and the idiots who take part in these programmes are simply attention-seeking cretins and wanna-be-famous idiots. The simple fact is that reality television is CHEAP television because it turns members of the public into the cast, so they don't have to pay proper actors or spend money on real drama programmes.
The sort of people who will be queueing up to take part in this show will be pathetic little nobodies like Sonya-whatever-her-n
ame-is who wants to be famous. When she says "I have drama in my life every week" perhaps she should either sign up for drama school and learn how to become a serious actress or talk to a psychiatrist about how to become a normal person.Roy Stockdill

Turn it into an attack on Dorothy Thornhill if you like but that was hardly the point of the story, was it? The question is whether Watford needs a so-called "reality" TV programme shot in the town and what it will do for Watford's reputation.

Having myself been involved in a few television programmes over the years, I can tell you that TV producers and programme makers are unmitigated but clever charlatans and will make people jump through hoops to obtain the results and the film they want!

You have been warned! Nothing whatsoever to do with Dorothy. It's all about what television people want to make of Watford and anybody who can't see this must be very stupid and ignorant.

Everybody seems to be missing the point here.
Turn it into an attack on Dorothy Thornhill if you like but that was hardly the point of the story, was it? The question is whether Watford needs a so-called "reality" TV programme shot in the town and what it will do for Watford's reputation.
Having myself been involved in a few television programmes over the years, I can tell you that TV producers and programme makers are unmitigated but clever charlatans and will make people jump through hoops to obtain the results and the film they want!
You have been warned! Nothing whatsoever to do with Dorothy. It's all about what television people want to make of Watford and anybody who can't see this must be very stupid and ignorant.Roy Stockdill

crazyfrog wrote:
Well Dorothy has made us the watford residents a &quot;butt of jokes" with her health campus scheme to toche Dorothy !!

There will be no health campus

Money appears to have run out .

There has to be another court case , that will take more money.

Guess where from ....

[quote][p][bold]crazyfrog[/bold] wrote:
Well Dorothy has made us the watford residents a "butt of jokes" with her health campus scheme to toche Dorothy !![/p][/quote]There will be no health campus
Money appears to have run out .
There has to be another court case , that will take more money.
Guess where from ....bishopofwatford

Turn it into an attack on Dorothy Thornhill if you like but that was hardly the point of the story, was it? The question is whether Watford needs a so-called &quot;reality" TV programme shot in the town and what it will do for Watford's reputation.

Having myself been involved in a few television programmes over the years, I can tell you that TV producers and programme makers are unmitigated but clever charlatans and will make people jump through hoops to obtain the results and the film they want!

You have been warned! Nothing whatsoever to do with Dorothy. It's all about what television people want to make of Watford and anybody who can't see this must be very stupid and ignorant.

Quite agree Roy but some believe there is no such thing as bad publicity !

[quote][p][bold]Roy Stockdill[/bold] wrote:
Everybody seems to be missing the point here.
Turn it into an attack on Dorothy Thornhill if you like but that was hardly the point of the story, was it? The question is whether Watford needs a so-called "reality" TV programme shot in the town and what it will do for Watford's reputation.
Having myself been involved in a few television programmes over the years, I can tell you that TV producers and programme makers are unmitigated but clever charlatans and will make people jump through hoops to obtain the results and the film they want!
You have been warned! Nothing whatsoever to do with Dorothy. It's all about what television people want to make of Watford and anybody who can't see this must be very stupid and ignorant.[/p][/quote]Quite agree Roy but some believe there is no such thing as bad publicity !bishopofwatford

You may have a point there, but I suspect the programme will not show Watford in a very good light.

I have dealt with television people before and they have very few scruples or principles and will go to any lengths to get the sort of programme and image they want to achieve. Do you have any idea what they can do with editing?

You may have a point there, but I suspect the programme will not show Watford in a very good light.
I have dealt with television people before and they have very few scruples or principles and will go to any lengths to get the sort of programme and image they want to achieve. Do you have any idea what they can do with editing?Roy Stockdill

bishopofwatford wrote:
Undoing 10 years of her work? Does that include

a) hundreds of drunken individuals in the high street after midnight

b) running down a good market

c) trying to sell allotments to property developers

d) allowing building on flood plain land

e) spending millions on paving and a bridge over the pond

Well thats five reasons that iwatford has gone downhill !

The market is being run down as its going to be demolished to make way for the new Intu extension. A cinema, new leisure facilities and more shops is far better, in my opinion, than a concrete monstrosity and a very shabby looking market. Plus a new market is being built up the road.

[quote][p][bold]bishopofwatford[/bold] wrote:
Undoing 10 years of her work? Does that include
a) hundreds of drunken individuals in the high street after midnight
b) running down a good market
c) trying to sell allotments to property developers
d) allowing building on flood plain land
e) spending millions on paving and a bridge over the pond
Well thats five reasons that iwatford has gone downhill ![/p][/quote]The market is being run down as its going to be demolished to make way for the new Intu extension. A cinema, new leisure facilities and more shops is far better, in my opinion, than a concrete monstrosity and a very shabby looking market. Plus a new market is being built up the road.jag000

Just a PR stunt by Cameo to bring in more people to their club. 1 there is no production company or show called we are Watford. 2 a legit production company would have a legit email address. Not a @mail or gmail email. 3 producers casting agents and scouts for these type of shows NEVER go scout in clubs. Especially for like 6 nights. What it actually is Cameo have found out about the real reality show being produced in HERTFORDSHIRE and one of the cast is from WATFORD. So they thought they can pull this PR stunt. The real show producers are going to sue cameo and the lovely fake production company that doesn't even exist...............
.

Just a PR stunt by Cameo to bring in more people to their club. 1 there is no production company or show called we are Watford. 2 a legit production company would have a legit email address. Not a @mail or gmail email. 3 producers casting agents and scouts for these type of shows NEVER go scout in clubs. Especially for like 6 nights. What it actually is Cameo have found out about the real reality show being produced in HERTFORDSHIRE and one of the cast is from WATFORD. So they thought they can pull this PR stunt. The real show producers are going to sue cameo and the lovely fake production company that doesn't even exist...............
.badddaaaman

bishopofwatford wrote:
Undoing 10 years of her work? Does that include

a) hundreds of drunken individuals in the high street after midnight

b) running down a good market

c) trying to sell allotments to property developers

d) allowing building on flood plain land

e) spending millions on paving and a bridge over the pond

Well thats five reasons that iwatford has gone downhill !

The market is being run down as its going to be demolished to make way for the new Intu extension. A cinema, new leisure facilities and more shops is far better, in my opinion, than a concrete monstrosity and a very shabby looking market. Plus a new market is being built up the road.

The market has been starved of invstent for over the last 10 years!

I do not consider portakabins with no parking/unloading for market traders
an improvement.

What was needed in the place of the old market was a bus station/ transport hub NOT more soulless shops in the hideously named intu !

[quote][p][bold]jag000[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]bishopofwatford[/bold] wrote:
Undoing 10 years of her work? Does that include
a) hundreds of drunken individuals in the high street after midnight
b) running down a good market
c) trying to sell allotments to property developers
d) allowing building on flood plain land
e) spending millions on paving and a bridge over the pond
Well thats five reasons that iwatford has gone downhill ![/p][/quote]The market is being run down as its going to be demolished to make way for the new Intu extension. A cinema, new leisure facilities and more shops is far better, in my opinion, than a concrete monstrosity and a very shabby looking market. Plus a new market is being built up the road.[/p][/quote]The market has been starved of invstent for over the last 10 years!
I do not consider portakabins with no parking/unloading for market traders
an improvement.
What was needed in the place of the old market was a bus station/ transport hub NOT more soulless shops in the hideously named intu !bishopofwatford

badddaaaman wrote:
Just a PR stunt by Cameo to bring in more people to their club. 1 there is no production company or show called we are Watford. 2 a legit production company would have a legit email address. Not a @mail or gmail email. 3 producers casting agents and scouts for these type of shows NEVER go scout in clubs. Especially for like 6 nights. What it actually is Cameo have found out about the real reality show being produced in HERTFORDSHIRE and one of the cast is from WATFORD. So they thought they can pull this PR stunt. The real show producers are going to sue cameo and the lovely fake production company that doesn't even exist...............

.

Interesting , you have obviously knowledge of this type of endeavour.

My previous entry ...the 7th word should read investment!

[quote][p][bold]badddaaaman[/bold] wrote:
Just a PR stunt by Cameo to bring in more people to their club. 1 there is no production company or show called we are Watford. 2 a legit production company would have a legit email address. Not a @mail or gmail email. 3 producers casting agents and scouts for these type of shows NEVER go scout in clubs. Especially for like 6 nights. What it actually is Cameo have found out about the real reality show being produced in HERTFORDSHIRE and one of the cast is from WATFORD. So they thought they can pull this PR stunt. The real show producers are going to sue cameo and the lovely fake production company that doesn't even exist...............
.[/p][/quote]Interesting , you have obviously knowledge of this type of endeavour.
My previous entry ...the 7th word should read investment!bishopofwatford

badddaaaman wrote:
Just a PR stunt by Cameo to bring in more people to their club. 1 there is no production company or show called we are Watford. 2 a legit production company would have a legit email address. Not a @mail or gmail email. 3 producers casting agents and scouts for these type of shows NEVER go scout in clubs. Especially for like 6 nights. What it actually is Cameo have found out about the real reality show being produced in HERTFORDSHIRE and one of the cast is from WATFORD. So they thought they can pull this PR stunt. The real show producers are going to sue cameo and the lovely fake production company that doesn't even exist...............

.

Interesting , you have obviously knowledge of this type of endeavour.

My previous entry ...the 7th word should read investment!

[quote][p][bold]badddaaaman[/bold] wrote:
Just a PR stunt by Cameo to bring in more people to their club. 1 there is no production company or show called we are Watford. 2 a legit production company would have a legit email address. Not a @mail or gmail email. 3 producers casting agents and scouts for these type of shows NEVER go scout in clubs. Especially for like 6 nights. What it actually is Cameo have found out about the real reality show being produced in HERTFORDSHIRE and one of the cast is from WATFORD. So they thought they can pull this PR stunt. The real show producers are going to sue cameo and the lovely fake production company that doesn't even exist...............
.[/p][/quote]Interesting , you have obviously knowledge of this type of endeavour.
My previous entry ...the 7th word should read investment!bishopofwatford

Andy Wylie wrote:
Yes, I do actually and have to walk across that area going home from or to work, sometimes at night when all the mayhem is going on. It is less intense now than, say, a decade ago but it is still a bit lively.
I would like to see Councils able to control the number of licences premises within a certain measured area.

Dotty dreamer come back down to earth!

[quote][p][bold]Andy Wylie[/bold] wrote:
Yes, I do actually and have to walk across that area going home from or to work, sometimes at night when all the mayhem is going on. It is less intense now than, say, a decade ago but it is still a bit lively.
I would like to see Councils able to control the number of licences premises within a certain measured area.[/p][/quote]Dotty dreamer come back down to earth!watfordrick