I heard this excellent analysis by former Vice Presidential candidate for Peroutka, Chuck Baldwin. He gives excellent insight into what the heroes of the Alamo had to go through to keep America a free country. What would happen today with all of the yuppies if they were sent to the Alamo? Read this story if you want to see what real heroes are like. I first heard Alex Jones read this on air and I hope everyone will read this great article.
link: http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/baldwin/050307

I heard this excellent analysis by former Vice Presidential candidate for Peroutka, Chuck Baldwin. He gives excellent insight into what the heroes of the Alamo had to go through to keep America a free country. What would happen today with all of the yuppies if they were sent to the Alamo? Read this story if you want to see what real heroes are like. I first heard Alex Jones read this on air and I hope everyone will read this great article.
link: http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/baldwin/050307

Those who fought at the Alamo are rightly considered American heroes but I don't think that their activities were productive from a White racialist perspective. The battle of the Alamo and the subsequent annexation of of it and other Mexican territory brought with it not just land but also the non White Mexicans that resided on it. This had the effect,as does imperialism in general, of further transforming an essentially White American republic into a multi-racial one. In addition many of the Alamo heroes married Mexican wives not all of whom were fully White.
The battle of the Alamo was no more fought to keep America a free country then are the current battles being fought in Iraq. Both are examples of Imperialism and both have and will generate dire consequences. American nationalism and White nationalism are not synonomous and in many instances are mutually exclusive. Peroutka and Baldwin are Conservative American nationalists and self proclaimed anti-racists.

Those who fought at the Alamo are rightly considered American heroes but I don't think that their activities were productive from a White racialist perspective. The battle of the Alamo and the subsequent annexation of of it and other Mexican territory brought with it not just land but also the non White Mexicans that resided on it. This had the effect,as does imperialism in general, of further transforming an essentially White American republic into a multi-racial one. In addition many of the Alamo heroes married Mexican wives not all of whom were fully White.
The battle of the Alamo was no more fought to keep America a free country then are the current battles being fought in Iraq. Both are examples of Imperialism and both have and will generate dire consequences. American nationalism and White nationalism are not synonomous and in many instances are mutually exclusive. Peroutka and Baldwin are Conservative American nationalists and self proclaimed anti-racists.

Thats really a very poor comparison frankly. The war in Iraq is an imperialistic war, yes. That much may be true but the defenders of the Alamo were freedom fighters, fighting against the tyranny of the Mexican government. Their goal, and it was a worthy one, was the establishment of an independant nation, the future Republic of Texas.
It was not annexed for another 9 years after the battle of San Jacinto. In the meantime it was its own independant nation with its own army, navy ( beleave it or not) president and all the other trapppings of a sovereign country.
So I do not see how you could compare the two.