The Muslim countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council that include Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and United Arab Emirates steadfastly refuse to accept any Syrian refugees. Amnesty International, USA (AIUSA) tells The Daily Caller News Foundation they have not accepted a single refugee since the armed Syrian conflict erupted years ago.

"The Gulf States have accepted zero refugees registered with the United Nations and administered through the U.N. resettlement program. They have accepted zero," Geoffrey Mock, the Syrian country coordinator for AIUSA, tells TheDCNF.

Nadim Houry, the Human Rights Watch deputy director for the Middle East and North Africa, calls it "shameful."

I bet lot of those refugees are funded by gulf states to get in Europe. It is not cheap trip. They want to conquer Europe and if we dont stop that they will succeed. When they get to Europe, they multiply like fucking roaches.

They think that by writing fat cheques, their duty to humanity is done.To counter these reports, Saudi Arabia is claiming that they have accepted 2.5 million refugees. They have converted all migrant workers into refugees!!

They think that by writing fat cheques, their duty to humanity is done.

They are not doing anything. The European Union has spent more than 30 billion EUR in providing housing and food for the Syrian refugees so far. On the other hand, the Saudi Arabians have so far spent less than 100 million EUR for the same purpose, despite sharing the same language and religion with the refugees. And they are mocking the refugees with statements such as this one:

Probably the Gulf states don't want the refugees because they are more moderate Muslims than Gulf natives, and they are also used to more freedoms than exist in the Gulf states. A large influx of people like that would upset the hold the ultra conservative clerics have over that area.

Probably the Gulf states don't want the refugees because they are more moderate Muslims than Gulf natives, and they are also used to more freedoms than exist in the Gulf states. A large influx of people like that would upset the hold the ultra conservative clerics have over that area.

You think the Saudis are more moderate?The extremist Wahhabi form of Islam, which is practiced by the Saudis, is the cause of most problems in the world today.

To be honest, your post is a typical sample of propaganda, which is backed by nothing. Just some empty claim that some channel is equal to well known bullshitters. It doesn't worth anything unless you provide a sample of bullshit, which was published by RT. Have you ever tried to think about that?

I've seen a vast masses of utter bullshit on CNN, Fox, BBC & Co. Like using photos made in Tskhinvali as a background for report about Gori. Or silencing the guest of program when answer doesn't fit the agenda. RT is quite opposite, since its startup in 2005 I've never seen anything like that on RT. There were some mistakes or misinterpretations of course, but it's a common thing for everybody. So you can keep trying to push your "do you really believe blahblahblah", but your failure is quite expectable. It's not going to work and you have to deal with it.

Syrian Army artillery, MBTs, and BMPs are getting destroyed by BGM-71 TOW antitank missiles. From who....USA! Who sold then to Saudi Arabia years ago. Russian TOS/smerch/s-300, Iranian recon drones, Chinese 'red arrow' atgms - all this wide variety of crazy weaponry - It's like Syria is the world's dumping & training grounds.

They (turkey, USA, Saudi arabia) tried to overthrow Bashar's father, Haley, in the early eighties through Muslim brotherhood cells. The plan was to broadcast over radio that the 'revolution succeeded' - broadcasted from Turkey all the way to Baghdad. The MB attacked an artillery school if I remember correctly, then all that shit went down in Hama.

They were crushed quickly....but since then, Syria & Saudi Arabia were enemies. This is almost like a revenge attack

Probably the Gulf states don't want the refugees because they are more moderate Muslims than Gulf natives

I really doubt whether that is the case. According to a recent opinion poll, some 20% of the Syrians sympathized with the ISIS. The Sunnis, who make up more than 50% of the population of Syria are shifting towards the ultra-conservative version of Islam, ever since the civil war started in 2011. The real reason for refusing to accept the Syrians is that the Saudis don't want to spend their money on a bunch of refugees.

Probably the Gulf states don't want the refugees because they are more moderate Muslims than Gulf natives, and they are also used to more freedoms than exist in the Gulf states. A large influx of people like that would upset the hold the ultra conservative clerics have over that area.

You think the Saudis are more moderate?The extremist Wahhabi form of Islam, which is practiced by the Saudis, is the cause of most problems in the world today.

No...he's saying Syrians are more moderate, or used to a more moderate culture. Syrians* are used to more freedoms than exist in the gult states.

To be honest, your post is a typical sample of propaganda, which is backed by nothing. Just some empty claim that some channel is equal to well known bullshitters. It doesn't worth anything unless you provide a sample of bullshit, which was published by RT. Have you ever tried to think about that?

I've seen a vast masses of utter bullshit on CNN, Fox, BBC & Co. Like using photos made in Tskhinvali as a background for report about Gori. Or silencing the guest of program when answer doesn't fit the agenda. RT is quite opposite, since its startup in 2005 I've never seen anything like that on RT. There were some mistakes or misinterpretations of course, but it's a common thing for everybody. So you can keep trying to push your "do you really believe blahblahblah", but your failure is quite expectable. It's not going to work and you have to deal with it.

Dude...while you aren't wrong about BBC, Fox, and all the other bullshit 'entertainment news' that spread lies, stir up hatred & hide the truth - you cannot be serious when you say RT is the opposite (thereby meaning it's an unbiased source?). I LOVE RT...but can't deny that it operates on a huge slant with a huge amount of bias & lies when the situation can benefit Russia. It's literally backed by the Russian government dude...

One example with which I back this up is their immediate pointing of the finger at Ukraine for the MH17 disaster. They're trying so hard to appear un-biased, but practically blame Ukraine even in a 'documentary'

That being said, they're probably the best 'Main-Stream Media' outlet in the world, considering what they cover & what footage they obtain

UAE,Saudi Arabia, Bahrein,Kuwait,Oman, nobody accepted so called refugees. Because they are not refugees they are invaders on Europe. Its a plan. For them should be better if they were refugees to go to a land with similar culture and habits and religion they have. And why nobody even tried go there? Better 1 million of refugees in DUbai then 1million refugees in Italy...

Those are countries with strong economy, so they don't want them to make chaos like in European countries. Well can not behave like there, but don't want camps with them so it's more easy to send them to Europe