Search This Blog

Posts

I
saw this gun control meme the other day. We shall call it the “kid on the playground” argument. It’s meant to be a rebuttal of the gun rights argument, “Only
a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun.” What do you think?
Is it a valid rebuttal? The “kid on the playground
argument” is an argument from analogy, comparing one situation to another. But
it fails in a number of ways. An argument from analogy is only effective if the
two things being compared are similar in their most essential points. But this
is not the case with the “kid on the playground” argument and the “good guy with
a gun” argument. First,
a kid on the playground throwing rocks is not very similar to a man firing a gun in terms of their effects. We’re
comparing cuts and bruises to lethal wounds. This is a fatal flaw in the analogy. But
there is more. In the “good guy with a gun” argument, there is no one analogous to
the teacher in the “kid on the playground” argument. There is no one who gives
guns to all t…

We owe
Andrej Pejić a debt of gratitude. He has expressed perhaps as succinctly as possible
the political end game in the battle over sexual identity. Pejić, who was
born in Bosnia-Herzegovina and later emigrated to Australia, first made a name
for himself as an androgynous male model. Describing himself as “living between
genders,” he has at times appeared on the runway in both men’s and women’s
clothing in the same
show.
In 2014, he underwent “sex reassignment surgery” and changed his name from
Andrej to Andreja. In a
public statement
following his surgery, he said, “To be perceived as what you say you are is a
basic human right.” This concise statement is a perfect summary of the goal of
the “transgender” movement. But it’s a troubling statement for several reasons,
not the least of which is the fact that it is the business of governments to
protect and defend basic human rights.[1]
If Pejić has a
right to be perceived as a woman, what legal obligations does this impose on
his perc…