Article Tools

Gil Armijo, executive staff assistant to 5th District Supervisor Joe Centeno, has left the supervisor’s office. Recently Armijo has been embroiled in legal troubles and has been facing off against the District Attorney’s office head on, fighting a felony perjury charge stemming from a December 2007 DUI case.

He said in a statement to The Independent that he was recently diagnosed with a “disabling medical condition stemming from the emotional trauma and shock I experienced when the District Attorney breached a no contest plea bargain that the Superior Court judge represented as the end to all matters” related to the perjury case. The case and his illness are directly related, he said.

An email sent Tuesday to some county staffers from Centeno said Armijo’s last day is July 31, but that he is also currently out on medical leave until that day. July 31 is also Armijo’s next appearance in court.

The criminal problems started in December 2007, when Armijo was arrested for drunk driving in Carpinteria. Armijo claims he wasn’t driving drunk at the time, but that a friend had driven his car to the location in Carpinteria. An officer came upon his car parked alongside the roadway and later observed Armijo to appear to be intoxicated. There Armijo took a breathalyzer test and blew a 0.1614 percent blood-alcohol level (BAC) -more than twice the legal limit of 0.08. In his many court filings, Armijo has claimed that those results were incorrect due to the presence of nearby vehicles and their radio waves. Armijo, who alleges misconduct on the part of the Sheriff’s Department, said that deputies “gave me breath tests fully knowing that the exponentially intensified, powerful radio waves of four vehicles would yield a falsely high BAC.”

By Paul Wellman

Gil Armijo defending himself in court against perjury charges on 6/19/09

Armijo, representing himself, eventually pleaded no contest in a deal, wanting to put the matter behind him. But while he thought the matter had concluded, the DA’s office moved forward to file the perjury charge. The DA’s office has poured hundreds of thousands of dollars at his case, he said, because of “their unrelenting personal vendetta against me.”

According to authorities, Armijo lied during a DMV hearing in an attempt to avoid getting his license suspended. Given under oath, the alleged false statement led to the charge being filed. But Armijo said he didn’t lie on the stand, but that the arresting officer, Deputy Brad Bordon, did. He believes he was targeted because of his position, and that this is the first time the office has ever filed a perjury charge based on a DMV hearing. That criminal charge, which could lead to up to four years in prison for Armijo, is still pending.

Armijo, listed on Centeno’s Web site as a “field representative,” made $77,012 as an assistant to Centeno, who didn’t return a message requesting comment. In the past Armijo has indicated he planned to run for Centeno’s seat in 2010. More recently, in interviews about his court fight, Armijo has skirted the subject.

Comments

Wow its DUI city around here. Centeno employed someone with a DUI in a political position? People need to smoke pot, stay home and eat popcorn. Driving around, drinking at bars get you in trouble allright? Over in the city council race, we have 2 candidates with DUI's running for office. The Independent should investigate those cases before they become scandals like this one.

Supervisor Centeno is a strong law and order guy and ex police chief. However his main role on the board is to protect the rights of developers. When he was part of a three person majority with Firestone he had it pretty easy. Now he is losing his main staff person and times will be a bit harder. I actually have some sympathy for him in that I think he is a really honorable man whose philosophy and policies I just happen to totally disagree with. Why he hired Armijo is a mystery but it does raise questions about his judgement.

um i highly doubt that Armijo "quit". After his repeated insane actions on county time even his honorable boss had had it. someone ought to subpoena the records of armijos emails while working for Mr. C. not very honorable really.

I did a Google on "breathalyzer radio interference". At least the first 7 pages of hits are almost all DUI attorney websites. So this is apparently a well-known defense tactic (known since the early 1980's). Apparently some Smith & Wesson units were found in lab tests to be vulnerable to field strengths of 10 volts per meter in 1982. I wasn't able to dig up an objective source to see if RF interference is a practical possibility with today's breathalyzer designs.

I used to believe that a policeman was my friend and a judge my protector. Given my experiences, I have changed my mind. I do not give the police the benefit of the doubt. They are guilty until proven innocent. I am particularly suspicious when they form this blue line of we are never wrong, like in the Harvard professor case. This black and white mentality of we are right and the citizen is always wrong must go. Also, the judges are too often too friendly to the police and disbelieve the citizen. I wish I could say that I am the nut here with a slanted view. But, they trained me.