a) It birthing the bastard military occupation of Palestine
b) It’s silence over the massacre of Palestinians (or it’s silence of Zionist terrorists killing British citizens)
c) Its complicity in atrocities against the Palestinians and other people in the ME
d) It supplying nuclear material to help Israyhells nuclear program
e) providing a porous political, legal and economic system complimented with the largest cross party lobby groups in Westminster all with “Zionists welcome” signs dangling above them
f) collusion with Israyhell in attacking Egyptian people
g) Utter slaveishness to Israyhelli war criminals

No. It stretches as far as land theft. The UK still maintains its theft of a number of places, Northern Ireland being one, the other being the Malvinas (Falkland Islands). Our Kween, Kween Elizardbeth II Regina is a Kleptomainc and a mass murderer to boot. She as head of state sanctioned the genocide in Iraq, aren’t Iraqi’s in possession of justification for regicide?

President Hugo Chavez delivered a reality check on the Queen when the firebrand Venezuelan leader demanded Britain return the Falkland Islands to Argentina.

(3763 bytes) [c]

The outspoken Mr Chavez used his weekly television and radio show Alo Presidente to rally Latin America behind the cause of his Argentine counterpart Cristina Kirchner by making a direct appeal to Buckingham Palace.

“Look, England, how long are you going to be in Las Malvinas? Queen of England, I’m talking to you,” said Mr Chavez.“The time for empires are over, haven’t you noticed? Return the Malvinas to the Argentine people.”

Still addressing the Queen, he went on: “The English are still threatening Argentina. Things have changed. We are no longer in 1982. If conflict breaks out, be sure Argentina will not be alone like it was back then.”

He described British control of the islands in the South Atlantic as “anti-historic and irrational” and asked “why the English speak of democracy but still have a Queen”.

Mrs Kirchner sought to win new allies in Argentina’s claims to the islands when she made a direct appeal for support at a meeting in Mexico of the Rio Group of Latin American and Caribbean countries. Venezuela and Nicaragua rallied to Argentina’s side even before Mrs Krichner’s appeal, and it was reported that Brazil was ready to support any resolution backing Argentina’s sovereignty claims.

Argentine anger is likely to increase after Desire Petroleum, the British oil company that has towed a rig from Scotland to about 60 miles off the north of the Falklands, announced on Monday it had begun drilling.

Argentina is attempting to hamper oil exploration, insisting last week that all vessels using its ports must now seek permission if they plan to enter or leave British-controlled waters.

Argentina wants other South American countries to impose its transport restrictions to the Falklands but it is unlikely to win support from those closest to the islands such as Chile and Uruguay.

If – as the drillers insist – large amounts of oil and natural gas are discovered off the Falklands, Argentina would lose out heavily if it were unable to provide refining and port facilities.

Chile, Argentina’s traditional enemy, has long been a major supplier to the Falklands. An operations manager of a Uruguayan shipping agency who came out to Port Stanley on Saturday to discuss business was dismissive about the effectiveness of the latest Argentine decree.

Meanwhile, passengers from the British cruise liner Star Princess disembarked at Port Stanley on Monday for a day trip after the vessel reported leaving Buenos Aires with no demand for permission to sail to the Falklands.

Stepping on to the jetty for a few hours watching penguins or touring one of the battlefields from the 1982 war, passengers said the ship’s captain had reassured them several days ago it was “perfectly safe” to get off at when they reached the islands.

However, Maurice and Sylvia Bellamy from Felixstowe reported some unusual Falklands-related advice had been issued over the ship’s tannoy system.

“They told us we had to refer to the islands as the Falklands when we were there but as the Malvinas when we were in Argentina,” said Mr Bellamy, 74.

“And they also advised everybody to be courteous and not to wear anything with obvious Argentine symbols or logos on it if we got off in the Falklands.”

Argentina wants other South American countries to impose its transport restrictions to the Falklands but this would mean that they, too, could miss out on the lucrative profits from providing refining and port facilities if, as drillers believe, large amounts of oil and natural gas are retrieved off the Falklands.

Well done Hugo. Now Hugo let me advise you to move away from Fiat Currency. Gold and silver can maintain the Bolivarian revolution, otherwise it, Fiat, will be the death of you. Siler and Gold Hugo, Silver and Gold. Demand Gold for your oil exports the United Snakes. For your peoples sake Hugo.

It is not Islam alone which has prohibited interest. Other major religions like Judaism, Christianity and Hinduism have also done the same. The Bible disapproves of interest severely and makes no distinction between usury and interest.1 Those who took interest were
branded as wicked2 and could not, according to the Third Lateran Council (1179), be admitted to communion or receive Christian burial.3 The Qur’an also prohibits interest strictly and declares those who take interest to be at war with
God and His Prophet (2:279). This raises the question of why there is such a harsh verdict against interest in all these religions. Is there any sound rationale behind it?

Those who are against the prohibition assume that interest was prohibited mainly because of the injustice it inflicted on the poor, who were charged an exorbitant rate of interest for loans borrowed by them to satisfy some urgent need. This, they argue, led to exploitation
and further impoverishment of the poor. They, therefore, conclude that the prohibition of interest is no longer valid because banks in modern times do not resort to such exploitation.

The assumption on which this conclusion is based does not, however, reflect the historical realities. During the Prophet’s days, peace and blessings of God be on him, borrowing was not undertaken by the poor. This is because by the end of the Prophet’s life, when the prohibition of interest became strictly enforced, the needs of the poor were taken care of either by the rich or the bayt al-mal (the Public Treasury). Therefore, the poor did not have to borrow to fulfil their needs.

This leads to the question of who borrowed and why? Borrowing was resorted to primarily by tribes and rich traders who operated as large informal partnership companies to conduct largescale trade. This was necessitated by the prevailing circumstances. The difficult
terrain, the harsh climate, and the slow means of communication made the task of trade caravans difficult and timeconsuming. It was not possible for them to undertake several business trips to the East and the West during a given year. Only a few trips could be undertaken.
Hence, it was necessary for the caravans to muster a large volume of financial resources to purchase all the exportable products of their society, sell them abroad, and use the proceeds to bring back the entire import needs of their society.

Before Islam such resources were mobilized on the basis of interest. This was not acceptable to Islam because it led to injustice. If there was a loss, it was the entrepreneur or the trader who had to bear the entire loss in spite of all the trouble he took. The financier, who did nothing more than providing finance, got a predetermined positive rate of return. Islam, therefore, tried to remove the injustice resulting from this. It abolished the interest-based nature of the financierentrepreneur relationship and reorganized it on the basis of profit-and-loss-sharing. This enabled the financier to have a just share and the entrepreneur did not get crushed under adverse conditions, one of which could be the caravan being waylaid on the way.

This shows that, although the extension of meaningful help to the poor carries a high priority in the Islamic value system, it was not the primary reason for the prohibition of interest. The primary reason was the realization of overall socio-economic justice, which is declared by the Qur’an to be the main mission of all God’s messengers (57:25).

Justice, however, needs to be understood in a much wider context. Confining it merely to trade may not be able to take us far enough. Justice demands that the resources provided by God to mankind as a trust must be utilized in such a manner

that the universally-cherished humanitarian goals of general need fulfillment, full employment, equitable distribution of income and wealth, and economic stability are optimally realized. It is the contention of this paper that these humanitarian goals can be realized
more effectively if there is also a humanitarian strategy. An important, though not the only, element of such a strategy is the abolition of interest. The following discussion tries to show briefly how the interest-based financial system frustrates the optional realization of these
goals and how its reorganization in a way that increases the reliance on equity and reduces that on debt can help in their more effective realization.4

1. NEED FULFILLMENT
Financial intermediation on the basis of interest tends to allocate financial resources among borrowers primarily on the basis of their having acceptable collateral to guarantee the repayment of principal and sufficient cash flow to service the debt. End-use of financial resources does not constitute the main criterion. Even though collateral and cash flow are both indispensable for ensuring repayment of loans, giving them undue weight leads to a relative disregard of the purpose for which borrowing takes place. Hence, financial resources go mainly to the rich, who have the collateral as well as the cash flow, and to governments who, it is assumed, will not go bankrupt. However, the rich borrow not only for productive investment but also for conspicuous consumption and speculation, while the governments borrow not only for development and public well-being, but also for chauvinistic defence buildup and white elephant projects. This does not only accentuate macroeconomic and external imbalances, but also squeezes the resources available for need fulfillment and development. This explains why even the richest countries in the world like the United States have been unable to fulfil the essential needs of all their people in spite of their desire to do so and the abundant resources at their disposal.

2. FULL EMPLOYMENT
The living beyond means which the interest-based financial intermediation has the tendency to promote through the easy availability of credit, has led to a decline in savings in almost all countries around the world. Gross domestic saving as a percent of GDP has registered a
worldwide decline over the last quarter century form 26.2 percent in 1971 to 22.3 percent in 1998. The decline in industrial countries has been from 23.6 percent to 21.6 percent. That in developing countries, which need higher savings to accelerate development without a significant rise in inflation and debtservicing burden, has been even steeper from 34.2 percent to 26.0 percent over the same period.5 There are a number of reasons for this. One of these is the rise in consumption by both the public and the private sectors. This saving shortfall has been responsible for persistently high levels of real interest rates. This has led to lower rates of rise in investment, which have joined hands with structural rigidities and some other socio-economic factors to reduce the rates of growth in output and employment.

Unemployment has hence become one of the most intractable problems of most countries, including those in the rich industrial world. Unemployment stood at 9.2 percent in the European Union in 1999, more than three times its level of 2.9 percent in 1971-736 It may not be expected to fall significantly below this level in the near future because the real rate of growth in these countries has been consistently lower than what is necessary to reduce unemployment significantly. Even more worrying is the higher than average rate of youth unemployment because it hurts their pride, dampens their faith in the future, increases their hostility towards society, and damages their personal capacities and potential contribution.7

A decline in speculation and wasteful spending along with a rise in saving and productive investment could be very helpful. But this may not be possible when the value system encourages both the public and the private sectors to live beyond their means and the nterestbased financial intermediation makes this possible by making credit easily available without due regard to its end use. If, however, banks are required to share in the risks and rewards of financing and credit is made available primarily for real goods and services, which the Islamic system tries to ensure, the banks will be more careful in lending and credit expansion will be in step with the growth of the economy. Unproductive and speculative spending may consequently decline and more resources may become available for productive investment and development. This may lead to higher growth, a rise in employment opportunities, and a gradual decline in unemployment.

3. EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION
The inequitable allocation of financial resources in the conventional interestbased financial system is now widely recognized. According to Arne Bigsten, “the distribution of capital is even more unequal than that of land” and “the banking system tends to reinforce the unequal distribution of capital.”8 The reason is, as already indicated, interestbased financial intermediation tends to rely heavily on collateral and to give inadequate consideration to the strength of the project or the ultimate use of financing. Hence, while deposits come from a cross-section of the society, their benefit goes largely to the rich. As Mishan has rightly pointed out: “Given that differences in wealth are substantial, it would be irrational for the lender to be willing to lend much to the impecunious as to the richer members of ociety, or to lend the same amounts on the same terms to each”.9 The Morgan Guarantee Trust Company, one of the largest banks in the U.S., has admitted that the banking system has failed to “finance either maturing smaller companies or venture capitalists,” and “though awash with funds, is not encouraged to deliver competitively priced funding to any but the largest, most cash-rich companies.”10

In contrast with this, risk-reward sharing could be more conducive to the realization of equity. It would tend to compel the financier to give due consideration to the strength of the project, thus making it possible for competent entrepreneurs from even the poor and the middle-classes to be at least considered for financing if they have worthwhile projects, adequate managerial ability, and a reputation for honesty and integrity. This may enable society to harness the pool of entrepreneurial ability from even the poor and middle classes.
The rich contribution that such entrepreneurs can make to output, employment and need fulfillment could thus be tapped.

There is no reason to be unduly apprehensive about loan losses from such financing. The experience of the International Fund for agricultural Development (IFAD) is that credit provided to the most enterprising of the poor is quickly repaid by them from their higher earnings.11 Other small-loan programmes have yielded similar results in several countries. Nevertheless, it may be desirable to arrange insurance of small loans to provide protection to financiers against fraud and mismanagement.

4. ECONOMIC STABILITY
Economic activity has fluctuated throughout history for a number of reasons, some of which, like the natural phenomena, are difficult to remove. However, economic instability seems to have become exacerbated over the last three decades as a result of turbulence in the financial markets. One of the important reasons for this, according to Milton Friedman, a Nobel laureate, is the erratic behaviour of interest rates.12 The high degree of interest rate volatility injects great uncertainty into the investment market and makes it difficult for
entrepreneurs to take long-term investment decisions with confidence. This drives borrowers and lenders alike into the shorter end of the financial market. The result is a steep rise in highly leveraged short-term debt, which plays an important role in destabilizing financial
markets.

One may wish to pause here to ask why a rise in short-term debt should accentuate instability. This is because short-term debt is easily reversible as far as the lenders are concerned. Its repayment is, however, difficult for the borrowers if the amount is locked up in medium- and long-term investments with a long gestation period. While there is nothing basically wrong in a reasonable amount of short-term debt, which Islam allows on the basis of its sales-based modes of financing for real goods and services, an excess of it tends to get diverted to speculation in the foreign exchange, commodity and stock markets.

The 1997 East Asia crisis has clearly demonstrated this. The Eastern tigers had healthy fiscal polices which could be the envy of a number of developing countries. However, the large inflow of short-term foreign funds led to rapid growth in bank credit to the private sector.
This created speculative heat in the stock and property markets. It was the old mistake of lending on collateral without evaluating the underlying risks. As soon as there was a shock, there was a rapid outflow of funds, which had come primarily, on a short-term basis. This led to a precipitous fall in asset prices and exchange rates, making the borrowers unable to repay to the local banks, which could not in turn repay their short-term loans from foreign banks. There was thus a banking crisis. The IMF had to come to the help of these countries by arranging a huge amount of loans. What this ended up doing was to enable the foreign banks to get back their loans and go scot-free. The burden of the debt consequently shifted to the governments and, ultimately, to the taxpayers of these countries.

The 1998 collapse of the hedge fund, LTCM (Long-term Capital Management), was also due to highly-leveraged shortterm lending. On the strength of their own equity, the hedge funds are able to borrow enormous amounts which they use to speculate in the international commodity, stock and foreign exchange markets, and thus end up destabilizing financial markets around the world. The leverage of LTCM was 25:1 before the crisis, but rose to 50:1, and ultimately to 167:1, after the crisis.13 If the Federal Reserve had not come to its rescue, the whole world economy could have been driven to the precipice of a serious financial crisis. The heavy reliance on short-term borrowing has injected a substantial degree of instability even in the international foreign exchange markets. Daily turnover in the international foreign exchange markets was $1,490 billion in April 199814, which was 49 times the daily volume of world merchandise trade.15 This indicates that a substantial volume of foreign exchange transactions is for speculative purposes. According to Andrew Crockett, General Manager of the Bank for International Settlement (BIS), “Our economies have thus become increasingly vulnerable to a possible breakdown in the payments system.”16

If it is not desirable to rely largely on short-term credit, then the more desirable thing to do would be to rely on long-term borrowing and equity. Of these two, equity financing is preferable because it would introduce greater health in the economy through a more careful scrutiny of the projects financed.17 A number of world-renowned scholars like Henry Simons, Hyman Minsky, Charles Kindleberger, Joan Robinson, G.L. Bach, and Kenneth Rogoff have hence concluded that an economy where there is greater reliance on equity would tend to be more stable than a debt-based economy.18

CONCLUSION
Thus it may be seen that greater reliance on equity financing has to be an indispensable part of the strategy of any system which wishes to actualize the humanitarian goals of need fulfillment, full employment, equitable distribution of income and wealth, and economic stability. The reason why capitalism has not been able to realize these goals effectively is not because its goals are not humanitarian or the people in capitalist countries do not have the will and the resources needed for this purpose. The primary reason is the conflict that exists between its goals and its strategy. The goals are humanitarian, originating from its religious past, while the strategy is social-Darwinist, based on the concept of survival of the fittest. It relies primarily on the rate of interest for allocating financial resources. This gives an edge to the rich and leads to not only concentration of wealth but also a rise in conspicuous and wasteful consumption. This hurts the realization of goals. It also contributes substantially to the prevailing instability in the international financial markets. Mills and Presley are, therefore, right in concluding that:

“There are sufficient grounds to wish that, in hindsight, the prohibition of usury had not been undermined in Europe in the sixteenth century. More practical wisdom was embodied in the moral stand against usury than was then realized”.19

1. For the Babylonian, Jewish and Christian
views on interest, see, Johns, et.al. in Hastings,
Vol.12, pp. 548-58; and Noonan, 1957, p.20.
For the Hindu view, see Bokare, 1993, p.168.
2. See the Bible – Ezekiel, 18:8, 13, 7; 22:12.
See also Exodus, 22: 25-27; Leviticus, 25:36-
38; Deuteronomy, 23:19; and Luke, 6:35.
3. Johns, et.al, p.551.
4. The subject has been discussed in greater
detail by the author in Chapra, 1985, pp.19-
29 and 107-145; 1992, pp. 327-34; and 2000
a and b.
5. Figures have been derived from the Table on
“Consumption as percent of GDP” in IMF,
2000 Yearbook, pp.177-79.
6. OECD, Economic Outlook, December 1991,
Table 2, p.7; and June 2000, Table 22, p.266.
7. A question may be raised here about the
current low rate of unemployment in the U.S.
in spite of a substantial decline in household
saving. There are a number of reasons for this.
One of the most important of these is the large
inflow of foreign funds which “has helped to
fund a pronounced increase in the rate of growth
of the nation’s capital stock”(Peach and
Steindel, September 2000, p.1). Once there is
a reversal of, or even a decline in, this inflow,
it may be difficult to sustain the high rate of
growth in output and employment. In addition
the stock market may also experience a steep
decline.
8. Bigsten, 1987, p.156.
9. Mishan, 1971, p.205.
10. Morgan Guarantee Trust Company of New
York, 1987, p.7.
11. The Economist, 16 February 1985, p.15.
12. Friendman, 1982, p.4.
13. IMF, World Economic Outlook, December
1998, p.55. Leverage indicates the extent of
borrowing on the basis of equity. A leverage of
25:1 means a loan of $25 on the strength of a
capital of $1. When the leverage is high, it is
difficult for borrowers to repay their loans when
asset prices fall.
14. See Table 1 of the BIS Press Release of 19
October 1998 which gives the preliminary
results of the foreign exchange survey for April
1998. Such a survey is conducted by the BIS
every three years.
15. World merchandise trade (imports plus
exports) amounted to $908.7 billion in April
1998 (IMF, International Financial Statistics,
November 1998). The average value of the
daily world merchandise trade in April 1998
was thus only $ 30.3 billion.
16. BIS Press Release, 22 June 1994, p.3.
17. See IMF, World Economic Outlook, May
1998, p.82.
18. Simons, 1948, p.320; Minsky, 1975; see
also the summary of Minsky’s argument cited
by Joan Robinson, December 1977, p.1331;
Kindleberger, 1978, p.16; Bach, 1977, p.182;
and Rogoff, fall 1999, pp.211-46.
19. Mills and Presley, 1999, p.120.
2001

* This paper is a significantly revised and
updated version of the paper, “A Matter of
Interest: The Rationale of Islam’s Anti-Interest
Stance,” published in the October 1992 issue
of Ahlan wa Sahlan, pp.38-41.
Dr. Chapra is Research Advisor at the Islamic
Research and Training Institute of the Islamic
Development Bank, Jeddah.

Good news for UK human rights, peace movement, greens and 9/11 activists. Cynthia McKinney, for many years a congressional representative from Atlanta Georgia, and most recently US Green Party candidate for president, will be addressing a parliamentary meeting and later a public meeting on March 8 (International Women’s Day) at London University’s prestigious School of African and Oriental Studies.

The meetings have been organised by Reinvestigate 911 but Cynthia will be heard by people active in many campaigns. For many years Cynthia used her seat in Congress to give a platform to many disadvantaged groups, but in the end the Washington oligarchy was able to remove her. A vicious media campaign, lack of support from the Democratic leadership, massive funding of her local opponents and a well organised Republican crossover vote saw her removed in a primary in her Georgia constituency.

As well as supporting the rights of women, native Americans and others at home, Cynthia is a supporter of the Palestinian cause and risked her life on a boat that tried to lift the blockade of Gaza last year. She was arrested and held incommunicado in Israel for nearly a week.

Like the US Green Party, the UK Green Party, Reinvestigate 911 and most sensible 9/11 sceptics, Cynthia does not claim to know exactly how the 9/11 attacks really happened or exactly who was behind them – just that the event has gravely suspicious features, fitted in perfectly with the pre-existing neocon plans to seize Iraq, and that a real investigation has never been mounted. Cynthia was the only representative to ask public questions in Congress about the Pentagon’s “anti-hijack exercise” that was running at the time the 9/11 attacks took place.

Other speakers include Nafeez Ahmed a terrorism expert who has investigated the links between the CIA and “Al Qaeda”.

In addition organisers are planning a slideshow and videos including leading French humorist Jean-Marie Bigard making fun of the official 9/11 story. There will also be a surprise speech by The Queen. (It’s on a rather fuzzy video but it’s been reliably authenticated by the CIA and their friends over at the BBC Conspiracy Files) .

1,000 ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS DEMAND NEW 9/11 INVESTIGATION

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth are holding a major press conference in San Francisco this Friday Feb. 19th, at 11:00 AM to mark the 1000th expert to sign up to the demand for an independent scientific investigation into the rapid and symmetrical collapse of three high rise buildings on September 11 2001, buildings which were expressly designed to withstand an impact with a fully laden passenger jet.

AE are calling on cities all around the world organize mini press conferences, so that the information will spontaneously gel everywhere at once. Even if the press does not come, A&E are asking people to gather in front of an official building, read out the announcement, and take a photograph, and send it to A&E for their website..

This working meeting is by invitation. Please contact info@reinvestigate911.org for the details. Anyone offering concrete help is welcome. We will be planning publicity for the Cynthia McKinney visit and discussing election strategy

UK GENERAL ELECTION PLANS

If you know of any candidates who are calling for a new investigation into the 9/11 attacks, please contact info@reinvestigate911.org. Here is a quick guide to the political landscape, based on our lobbying experience. There are 9/11 sceptics in all parties, as we know from organising our meetings in Parliament. The Green Party has voted for a new 9/11 investigation but in the teeth of fierce opposition form the careerist wing, led by Darren Johnson, their candidate in Lewisham. Libdems are widely sceptical but many are nervous of going public until after the election. Labour and the Tories have very mixed views. Some on the Left quietly welcomed 9/11 as payback for US policies, others support us. Libertarian tories (including at least one one-time Thatcherite) are more suspicious of 9/11 than mainstream tories.

We are calling on all anti-war activists, those worried about the emerging global oligarchy and those who support civil liberties at home to unite around a viable election strategy. One possibility, modelled on the highly successful Israel lobby, would be to target the worst candidates, the warmongers, for removal, and try to achieve a hung parliament as the next best thing to kicking out the scoundrels who we can’t remove.

We will support any new investigation of the 9/11 attacks so long as
*it is run by uncompromised people with a range of opinion including those inclined to disbelieve the official 9/11 story,
*it has full legal authority to demand immediate access to any evidence and any witness it chooses
*it follows the evidence wherever it leads
*it is given all the resources it requires to carry out its investigation

Humans sure suck. In many ways, I suck too. Hardly a day goes by (unless I lock myself away) when I don’t see humans being/talking/doing crap. I think I want to divorce humanity.

Selfism: I heard some time ago a supposed saying of the prophet Muhammad (saw) that there will come a time where a man is weeping at a grave wishing it was him inside the grave and not having to live in the outside world. I feel that quite often. If I had to give my life for something, I’d have to be damn convinced it would have meaning. Trouble is, in isolation deaths have almost zero meaning. Even the countless millions who gave their lives in the wars and caused of the 20th century didn’t really achieve anything did they? I’m not sure giving ones life can be meaningful these says, which makes the pain while weeping on top of the grave much more painful.

I am actually, honestly speaking, afraid to die. I think I shouldn’t be, but I am. This may display a lack of faith, which is weird ‘cos I think I have a good belife on God (peraps I’m deluding myself?) but one things for sure I’m can’t imagine anything that would break my faith in God (Oh Rabb, please spare me in testing that assertion).

My issues with the human species seem like they will never end. Cue the Jewish/Israyhelli/Zionist assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh member of Hamas. Brits are and have allowed themselves to be spun by the Zionist British Government and opposition(!) into a stupid debate about fake passports. (Although this blog looks at 9-11 stuff, other than this brief mention of the parallels with 9-11 ‘hijackers’ identity, and the significant Israyhelli connections there, I’m not going to say more about it)

For heavens sake idiots, every government will issue fake passports, That the Zionist parasites fake or even steal their surrogate mothers, i.e. the UK should acually be a nobrainer. Passports have no meaning to the elite. Passports are merely a device which the elite gains/holds some form of control over us. It resembles people getting themselves into a flap about unorthodox protocols in relation to the farting, deficating, urinating, snoring, belching, snot producing kween.

The REAL issue is the murdering/thieving Zionist state of Israyhell which is “caucasionally pervasive”. They act with impunity. They hald much of the world by the gonads. Israyhell will do WHAT EVER IT TAKES, in line whith the perverse philosophy it is following. It is unstoppable, but don’t whatever you do that that to mean one shouldn’t resist. Even if resistance is futile, it certainly isn’t meaningless and it is absollutely moral

Israyhell (unless you think this so called “Israel” with all it does, is the manefestation of a divine nation (may God forgive me)) ushering in the False Messiah. It’s €likely to me to be utterly connected to Gog and Magog if not Gog and Magog themselves. If all this mens Israyhell feels it’s time to use it’s nukes, it WILL launch those nukes. That it’s managed to stifle/distract global opposition and isn’t so much in YOUR face doesn’t makes its world shaking agenda any the less signiicant or vile.

Israyhell is the keystone in the the prophecy to doom.

The number of Jews who reject Israyhell are as one Hamas politician told me, measurable by the handfull. True Torah Jews, Jews against Zionism, Naturei Karta… mere handfulls of great men in possession of the near absolute truth and understanding of their religion. Although out of respect for these good people and even the “atheist Jews” (who criticise Israyhell e.g. Finkelstein etc who still hold a perverse view that Israyhell has some ‘right’ to exist!) I try not to use the word Jew in labeling Israyhelli crimes, it is beyond doubt that most Jews are supportive of Zionism.

So stop the stupidity over real/fake passports. Know thine enemy and realise they will do what the hell they like. Worse then racist/supremacism, it’s inverted and incorrect divine supremacism.

http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/217832 reproduces an ICH published report. Here’s a quick extract: ZeroHedge: — For Greece, with on and off balance sheet liabilities at over 800%, it’s game over. For the Eurozone, with the same ratio at about 500%, it is also game over. For the US, at 500%+, it is, you guessed it (sorry Joseph Stiglitz), game over.

And more news: Spain’s deficit has soared to 11.4 percent of its gross domestic product amid its deepest recession in decades, but the government has pledged to cut the gap back to a eurozone limit of 3 percent by 2013 by cutting 50 billion euros in spending… unemployment running at 20 percent. Underscoring those doubts, the premium demanded by investors for buying Spanish rather than German government bonds ES10YT=RR has risen in recent weeks and the cost of insuring Spanish bonds against default by the government has also risen

If I read that right (and I’m not an economist), people are shorting Spain and taking credit defalut swaps on the Spanish government.

And more: Greece: “From 1. Jan. 2011, every transaction above 1,500 euros between natural persons and businesses, or between businesses, will not be considered legal if it is done in cash. Transactions will have to be done through debit or credit cards”

Europe and the Euro is going belly up, The UK public purse is in a dire situation (the killers in the Downing Street cabinet should have nationalised Barclays, not Northern Rock) and Goldman Sachs has already done spectacularly well with nearly God knows how many hundreds of Billions granted to it by the US govt to leverage and make new scam packages like it’s never scammed before, oh, and line the pockets of the already filthy rich. Iceland doesn’t want to pay the UK and the dreadful charities who invested in oppressive fraudulent Icelandic ‘financial instrument’ houses. Ireland is up the swanny, Italy? well it’s the gangster economy that it always was, Singapore, seems to be going down (and will take Indonesia Thailand and Malaysia with it)

And the supposed Alt A and Option ARM crisis hasn’t fully crashed in yet.

Surprised? You should be. E-MONEY is the game (see above Greece’s bizarre announcement that Reuters reported).

I’m wholly unapologetic for believing this is the plan. E-money has been on the cards for a while. Whose cards you might ask? Quiz the supremacists (if they are willing to speak to you – being an animal to serve their purposes that is) Those supremacists who firmly believe they, and they alone, hold an unconditional covenant handcuffing God are getting their way. What’s happening is in ALL serious philosophies. The end times are rolling on up. To these rather nasty people it doesn’t matter because remember, it was their Rabbi who defeated God in an debate. It’s them, not God who are calling the shots. They might throw God some manna occasionally and might allow God to run in the yard for 30 minutes each day in-between water-boarding, kicking grit in his ‘eyes’, putting him in stress positions and shouting at God that He’s an anti-Semite for destroying Zion after they altered Deuteronomy so that they can lend on interest. God, Islam tell us, declares WAR against whose who engage in usury.

As for the God fearing Jews: brothers, (or perhaps more accurately: cousins) we’re going down! All of us. Why is it this likely new purge of good Jews a is being predicted (e.g. Alan Hart and others) has continuously come as a result of those who perverted your faith. At least we can have some weird sense of justice when they realise ‘God in cuffs’ was simply an illusion they were allowed to see.