The Scranton School District has 19 days to erase a nearly $19 million budget deficit. With a balanced budget due by the end of the year, the district could announce program cuts and layoffs by the end of the week.
(read more)

A 22-year-old Scranton man whom police charged with setting fire to his downtown apartment and driving more than 100 people from their homes Sunday admitted to investigators he did it because he wanted to move
(read more)

Article Tools

HARRISBURG — Years after Robert Mellow went to federal prison for corruption, the longtime Democratic leader of the state Senate will get his $245,000 annual pension back, a state board has narrowly decided.

It’s the only time in at least 11 years that the board of the State Employees’ Retirement System has returned someone’s pension after it was taken away for a criminal conviction. Mellow had appealed the initial decision.

The former lawmaker from Archbald prevailed in a 6-5 vote, with some members arguing that it would set a bad precedent.

“The board struggled with this decision as evidenced by the split nature of the vote, including the filing of dissenting opinions, which does not happen often,” board spokeswoman Pamela Hile said in an email.

In question was whether Mellow’s federal conviction for conspiracy to commit mail fraud and to defraud the U.S. closely enough resembled any of a number of state crimes that require state employees to automatically forfeit their pensions.

Board members either declined comment or did not respond to calls — all 11 were contacted. Written opinions filed in the case offer some hints as to why they voted the way they did.

Mellow, a senator for 40 years, pleaded guilty in 2012 after prosecutors charged him with using taxpayer-funded staff to raise money and work on political campaigns. The State Employees’ Retirement System determined the conviction would cost him his pension. He appealed twice, resulting in the latest ruling.

State law requires employees to forfeit their pensions if they are convicted of or plead guilty to certain state crimes or federal crimes that are “substantially the same as” state crimes. Mellow contended nothing was comparable to his crime.

The majority opinion, attached to an order signed by chairman David Fillman, compares Mellow’s conviction to the state crime of theft by deception. The majority wrote that a theft by deception conviction would have required Mellow to “actually obtain money and property of the Senate” — and that was not an element of the federal conspiracy charge to which he pleaded.

The five dissenting members, in an opinion written by state Treasurer Joe Torsella, said the majority opinion was “an abrupt departure” from a previous board decision. They cited a case in which a district judge charged with federal mail fraud lost his pension.

The majority conclusion allows Mellow “to avoid the financial consequences of criminal conduct to which he pled guilty, creates a record of inconsistent determinations by the board and undermines the deterrent effect of the Forfeiture Law,” according to the dissenting opinion.

A board order dated Nov. 6, after all members had cast their ballots, calls for Mellow to receive his $20,510 monthly pension, plus payments and interest for the time it was forfeited. A portion of that will go to his ex-wife, Diane Mellow, as part of the couple’s divorce settlement. Diane Mellow had also appealed the decision to strip Robert Mellow of his pension.

Sal Cognetti, the attorney representing Robert Mellow, said he the board’s ruling was consistent with what he learned in continuing legal education classes.

“I am pleased that the law was followed, and I’m sure he is, too,” Cognetti said.

Diane Mellow’s attorney, Terry McDonald, said she was similarly pleased. The ruling, he said, allowed her to keep her home.

We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.