Si Spaniard of the White Rabbit Education Trust – High noon for the banks is 12th April 2013Lawful Rebellion Podcast 17 March 2013

Mortgages – A fraudulent banking empire built on lies, aided and abetted by a compliant regulatory body.

Time to prosecute them where it hurts.

If you want a laugh, come down to Southend Magistrates Court on the 12th April 2013. One Simon Spaniard will be making a case to commence private prosecutions against members of no less than 6 banks under various charges of fraud and theft. He is doing this to finally expose the nature of money being far different from what most people know. In speaking about his upcoming court case he says:

“I’m giving each of the unsecured, alleged creditors, the opportunity to be paid off in full on receipt or in exchange for the original wet-marked credit agreement, that’s a promissory note, otherwise known as a security, otherwise known as a commercial instrument, otherwise known as currency, otherwise known as cash”.

His actions have the potential to bring to light once and for all to the nature of banking deception using the courts, and the rules binding corporations (known as Statutes and Acts) against themselves. If his request to prosecute is accepted then he will be privately prosecuting individuals at a high level within several major banks. In this podcast Si talks in detail about the case and his dossiers containing letters and background documents containing all the necessary supporting evidence to smash apart the fraudulent banking racket whose hidden secrets rely upon just one thing: not being exposed. Si has deconstructed not only mortgages but also all credit agreements and leads a case against all individuals involved in handling his enquiries designed to tar-baby all that deal with him. Si speaks of his intentions to prove once and for all that either the courts will prosecute this provably fraudulent behaviour or finally prove themselves not fit for purpose. We then speak of recognition of peoples’ courts and forming a grand jury of the people.

Si Spaniards’ initial case hearing is the 12th April at Southend’s Magistrate court. Be there to support him if you can. Otherwise, check out the white rabbit youtube channel for even more in depth explanations of the sleight of hand commercial banks have used to monetise your credit agreement and then give you access to the money which you youself created when you signed the credit agreement. If you’re new to the ruse of modern commercial bank practices and bankruptcy then pay careful attention and if you need to contact the White Rabbit email: whiterabbiteducation[at]gmail.com

om Start – Document pack intro
3m30s – Unsecured credit dossier proving that promissory notes are used as cash for accounting purposes
5m30s – Faliures of the financial ombudsman to report any fraud committed by banks, circular referral process
7m15s – Section 323 insolvency act & HMRC does entitle people to set-off debts with assets
8m – You deposit a security which is treated as cash
9m30s – True definitions of money
10m – All companies are bankrupt already, people sponsor the credit system!
12m – We’ve not been taught that we’re creating money… that the instruments we sign are treated *as* money
14m – Si Spaniards’ Private prosecution application, 12 April Southend Magistrates Court going after the banks!
15m – Using this knowledge for Mortgages
17m – A hidden power of attorney within the mortgage agreement, enquiries with Santander
21m – Hidden power of attorney video with Si Spaniard
24m – Staying on point, Fraud by false representation. Sample letters to Santander.
25m – FSA Mortgage dossier showing a promissory note is the true security and not the bricks and mortar.
26m30s – Is the power of attorney used to sign the promissory note without you even seeing it?
27m30s – IMF publication The Chicago plan – ‘Banking today is a mode for transferring collateral from the people to the banks’
31m Affidavit of Walker Todd, BOE Future of Money Market Instruments
34m – Accounting entries related to you are ‘commercially sensitive’ and cannot be seen.
36m – FOI on Financial Obmudsman whose customers are the banks. A facade.
39m30s – Financial Ombudsman service keeps no records of awarded payouts!
42m – Make it matter to individual by going after them privately!

– Apologies for the dropped line at this point –

44m – Dripfeeding yout mortgage vendor the dossier documents. Letting them know that you know!
46m – Using the power of attorney enquiry as a delaying mechanism
49m – Brokering a deal with the FSA and the Mortgage companies. What happens when 25 million householders learn their mortgage is fraudulent?
52m30 – Could this go down like the PPI scandal? How might the fraud be resolved by the people?
54m – If the courts wont prosecute banks for fraud, then they are not fit for purpose
58m30s – Banks gamble against the public being able to pay back loans!
1h 2m – Si’s Crusade against the banks
1h 6m – Is a systemic collapse inevitable if the truth spreads far enough?
1h 7m – Panic creates the problems, so we don’t want chaos!
1h 8m – Positive solutions: When people realise they have had enough of their mortgage, then the solution is offered!
1h 10m – This system of hidden usury can obly continue whilst we are ignorant!
1h 11m – 1888 local gov act Sect 79, subsection 2. All liabilites of the inhabitants of a county are liabilities and duties of the council
1h 12m – The council is a trust, as it was always intended
1h 14m30 – If the corporatocracy has truly taken over then we must form peoples’ courts!
1h 15m – Convening a peoples’ court with grand jury should Si’s court case not be approved
1h 16m – Why do we continue to recognise corrupt system? How people’ courts gain authority in the bullshit commercial world
1h 22m – WANTED Posters in your local town: featuring the directors faces of your local bank
1h 28m – The awakening is already begun; people cannot unhear the truth!
1h 30m – Contact details (pls note TPUC are not carrying the download at present “>but you can get them *here* mediafire link)
1h34m – The whole system is based upon belief. Shift where your faith is placed (into people) and your energy goes with it!

24 Comments

Roy Jenkins

Posted March 20, 2013 at 8:12 PM

Dear Sir,

Sorry i can’t get there but i have ample evidence of bank fraud, criminal acts by a bank using false statements of truth in court, false figures used in court to gain a judgement facts admitted by the Bradford and Bingley in court.

Documents proving the lies of police officers and Chief Constables I.E Cannock CID stating in a letter that they and the company fraud office had handed my files to the CPS to see if this bank had a case to answer, then a phone call from these officers stating the CPS had thrown out my claim due to lack of evidence.

Several letters from Mr Ireland the then Chief Crown Prosecutor for Staffordshire CPS now stating “i can find no records on our electronic files or paper files for the date stated by the police, this included Cannock police station.

I began Blowing the Whistle to the US Attorney General William French Smith and the FBI in Houston, Texas as early as 1981. My Whistle Blowing also included Texas AG Mark White’s Office and many other State and Federal Government Agencies including HUD ….. I suppose I may be the Original Whistle Blower so ABSOLUTELY Sign Me Up …. Count Me In …. After All I’ve been at it 30 + Years

Michael

Posted March 26, 2013 at 1:48 PM

There seems to be a bit confusion here with the credit process. When you issue a promissory note (the mortgage contract) where the Bank is the beneficiary, you gave the bank no real value, just a promise so far. In exchange the Bank gives you a bank check (which the Bank will be called upon by the seller of your new home) or a demand deposit, for the nominal amount of the credit issued, and yes, the Bank gave you no real value either: you have just exchanged only promises to supply value on demand or at some time in the future. In effect, you get your new home for free and must pay for it with real value (your future work), but the problem is the real value is not paid to the seller but to the Bank, but the Bank has no intention of meeting their obligation to fulfill their promise of value. They know that due to fractional reserve system they only need to finance 5-10% of their promise with real value (some form of liquid capital or so called Hard Money – government issued cash) and the rest will be perpetually kept as a demand deposit (a perpetual promise of value). It is important to note that until the house seller converts his bank promise into real value (another house lets say) he got nothing for his house except a promise. But promises are valuable as money only if they will be honored, and if the Bank would endorse your promissory note in order to transfer it to another holder as payment for value it would become liable if the original promise was not honored with value (see local law re Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes or UN Convention “uniform law for bills of exchange and promissory notes”). Endorsing a not is not an unconditional “cashing out” the note but carries a liability until the note is discharged by payment.

Richy

Posted March 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM

Hey Monky, not sure where the confusion you refer to is? Si asserts that the line of credit is created upon signature of the note, as in accounting practices the note is treated as cash. The trick is, the money was always yours – you created it – so why do you need to pay back the principal and the interest on something you made in the first place. It is accounting sleight of hand to trick people in to thinking that the money you got with your mortgage was loaned to you. This is fraud. It’s all in the podcast.

Michael

Posted March 26, 2013 at 2:15 PM

I agree that there is a fraud but it lies in a different place to what appears at first sight. It is asserted in the podcast and in the attached documents that “You actually just paid for your own home with your promissory Mortgage Note”. I think this is misleading, as any real value (a house for example) can be paid for only with real value, not with a promise. So no actual payment with value is made until the loan is ‘worked off’. The fraud lies squarely with fractional reserve scenario, because it allows banks to delay fulfilling their promises (90-95% of them) into perpetuity. In effect, 90-95% of interest is indeed fraudulent.
The main misconception though seems to be the assertion than banks ‘sell’ our promissory notes for cash and that’s their profit also. If they would sell it, then the new holder would become our new creditor and bank would lose an asset and future interest. In any case, if the bank would endorse our note and ‘sell’ it it would still remain liable if the original party liable on the document (the mortgagee) would default on payment. This is of course not a big loss for the bank, only 5-10% of nominal amount, thanks to fractional banking privilege.

Richy

Posted March 26, 2013 at 2:26 PM

I would suggest that this is a point of contention, one that is not provable without full transparency and forensic accounting conducted on all the senior mortgage dealers/related banks. Either could be right. But. The point you make regarding who would become a creditor – an interesting consideration – however that (in my opinion) does not dissuade one from demanding full disclosure of the accounting practices behind the scenes of each mortgage transaction. One demand that will almost certainly never be met! Thanks for the comments.

Michael

Posted March 26, 2013 at 2:37 PM

I agree with that, hard to guess what we don’t yet know. I can see how easy it is to get excited and rely too heavily on circumstantial evidence, but if we are to succeed against such a formidable force we must be very disciplined about evidence and what we allow ourselves to believe, otherwise any false accusation could be used to undermine credibility. Good luck.

The first people to be put in the court should be the Rothschilds!
Check out on utube – The Money Masters.

Adam Hiley

Posted July 7, 2013 at 6:03 PM

Want real change then please Lawful Rebellion campaign against LibLabCon so We can get rid of them once and for all and throw out the EU/ECHR out of Britain install a Glass Steagall Act on the Banks so at last they work for us it was repealed in the US by Clinton bring it back in the UK and US, We have to re-assert our rights and sovereignty