It must be Slick, he has already been hit (well his bedeviled heart has been hit) by cupid's arrow a couple of strips ago.

Even if the effect of the arrows fades after a while it would have been fun to see the interactions between the two.

After all, even if they were to fall in ln love, courtesy of cupid, both of them would still have very different ideas on relationships._________________So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure;
How amazingly unlikely is your birth;
And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space;
'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth

Joined: 07 May 2011Posts: 1100Location: The Wrong side of the Reality Zone Sign

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 5:12 am Post subject:

Ember778 wrote:

Miss Magenta wrote:

Stop trying to get my hopes up. ; _ ;

She is tiny like him. Not quite sure if that's because she's young though or just because she's small like Slick.

Would be an interesting pair though. They're pretty different though, and in my experiences with relationships you usually need to have things in common.

The problem for her is that she is from the future and she really the child of Slick and Monique. She is on a mission to save herself and the world. We just can't see the big picture yet and we wait on Tat's wim _________________Awesome Happens

But yes, I suppose we all appreciate some imperfection in sympathetic characters -- How Fuchsia sometimes lets the fiery anger out, how Slick struggles unknowingly with his now externally-manifested Devil-Slick, how New 'nique has to deal with her past record. But then again we also have characters who tend to be consistently on the same line no matter what (Big D, Seymour). So there's a little bit for everyone, no big issue if Glossy is one of the latter.

Careful now, Tank, we can't have you posting furry stuff now, ya hear? I mean, Jazzycat even has a Furaffinity account n' everything. They've drawn a squirrel drinking tea and an otter under a waterfall. They represent themselves online with an image of a girl with antlers. They've even created depictions of Fluttershy and Rainbow Dash which are more horselike than what is usual. We simply cannot stand for this outrage.

Can't tell if sarcasm or just dislike of furries.

Sarcasm.

Though in the case of Finnegan, I dunno. I just.... I dunno._________________butts

But yes, I suppose we all appreciate some imperfection in sympathetic characters -- How Fuchsia sometimes lets the fiery anger out, how Slick struggles unknowingly with his now externally-manifested Devil-Slick, how New 'nique has to deal with her past record. But then again we also have characters who tend to be consistently on the same line no matter what (Big D, Seymour). So there's a little bit for everyone, no big issue if Glossy is one of the latter.

I remember Glossy and Curly were once just normal(although weird) girls, putting make-up on Seymour and shit. Now they're just machines,driven towards only one goal of feminism. Dammit, please bring them back, Tat.
Btw, wow, miss M, you are really rad when it comes to shipping

Sometimes I remember how silly The Sisterhood used to be and I cry because THEY WERE JUST SO SILLY AND GOOFY AND CUTE BUT DEADLY SERIOUS, A FORCE TO BE RECKONED WITH, and while I'll love them no matter what, I just want to see them be silly every now and then... ; _ ;