Given that Glasgow has equalled the number of gangs in London with only one-seventh of the population, I think it's a shining example of fiscal policy working - more machete for the buck, and all that.

What I want to know is, why should my taxes continue to fund what is obviously a more profligate gang culture in England?

Given that Glasgow has equalled the number of gangs in London with only one-seventh of the population, I think it's a shining example of fiscal policy working - more machete for the buck, and all that.

What I want to know is, why should my taxes continue to fund what is obviously a more profligate gang culture in England?