You agreed we might be on the verge of another error. You also said that no one would vote for McCain or Romney. The only logical conclusion is that you agree we're on the verge of another error even if no one votes for those to "asshats".

If that's not what you meant, then perhaps you need to be more careful when you rush to snap back.

Look, the reality is, not matter how much your donkey-shaped glasses might suggested otherwise, the next president is likely to be just as much of an error as the current one. Quit deluding yourself into believing that you aren't being sold a bill of goods.

You agreed we might be on the verge of another error. You also said that no one would vote for McCain or Romney. The only logical conclusion is that you agree we're on the verge of another error even if no one votes for those to "asshats".

If that's not what you meant, then perhaps you need to be more careful when you rush to snap back.

Right, and I quantified my answer with McCain or Romney. \

Every eye fixed itself upon him; with parted lips and bated breath the audience hung upon his words, taking no note of time, rapt in the ghastly fascinations of the tale. NOT!

And, given the current leading presidential candidates, no doubt, the beginning of another.

That depends. Will this new president invade and occupy other countries on a whim and cut taxes while raising spending (i.e., be a Republican)? If so, then yeah, it will be a terrible error, just like the last one.

Bottom line. Save for one candidate (Ron Paul), the next president is likely to be yet another error resulting in a (much) bigger, more intrusive and powerful state that will erode our freedoms even further, steal more of our money, continue perpetrating an imperialist foreign policy, and simply kill more people.

Bottom line. Save for one candidate (Ron Paul), the next president is likely to be yet another error resulting in a (much) bigger, more intrusive and powerful state that will erode our freedoms even further, steal more of our money, continue perpetrating an imperialist foreign policy, and simply kill more people.

*points at his signature*

I hate to say it, Ron Paul may (or may not) have good ideas, but unless the political/voter climate changes drastically, he's simply not electable right now.

You need skeptics, especially when the science gets very big and monolithic. -James LovelockThe Story of Stuff