When speaking of slavery’s “mention” in Torah – and Torah law, these demagogues mention slaves are treated well or quote Rabbi Kook’s assertion that slavery is a temporary concession, they use laundered terms for “slave” such as “indentured servant” or the like, point out that these laws require Yovel, etc. And they hope you don’t notice how weak their points are.

How come they don’t quote Megillah 27a which forbids selling one’s daughter as a maidservant? Don’t they know anything not brought down in the Shulchan Aruch?