9/11 Truther Behind NFL Dirty Bomb Scare

UPDATE: 10/19. Hold the phone. We found an even earlier instance of the same "threat". It is from Oct. 3rd. It's at this website. The poster is listed simply as "Australia". The text is precisely the same as the one circulating in the media (cited below) and which started the entire "scare". So, our original inclination to believe this has been circulating the web for some time seems to be correct. We have a screenshot, just in case the website goes down.

In any event, it is still a truther conspiracy nut that was behind it.

--------------------

The Jawa Report can reveal the original dirty bomb threat against the NFL made by a 9/11 conspiracy 'truther'. Full text below.

On Sunday, October 22nd, 2006, there will be seven "dirty" explosive devices detonated in seven different U.S. cities; Miami, New York City, Atlanta, Seattle, Houston, Oakland and Cleveland. The death toll will approach 100,000 from the initial blasts and countless other fatalities will later occur as result from radioactive fallout.

The bombs themselves will be delivered via trucks. These trucks will pull up to stadiums hosting NFL games in each respective city. All stadiums to be targeted are open air arenas, excluding Atlanta's Georgia Dome, the only enclosed stadium to be hit. Due to the open air, the radiological fallout will destroy those not killed in the initial explosion. The explosions will be near simultaneous, with the cities specifically chosen in different time zones to allow for multiple attacks at the same time.

The 22nd of October will mark the final day of Ramadan as it would fall in Mecca. Al-Qaida will automatically be blamed for the attacks. Later, through Al-Jazeera, Osama bin Laden will issue a video message claiming responsibility for what he dubs "America's Hiroshima".

In the aftermath civil wars will erupt across the world, both in the Middle East and within the United States. Global economies will screech to a halt. General chaos will rule.

Thus, the 'threat' was actually a conspiracy nut who claims the U.S. government will be behind the dirty bomb plot and then lay the blame on al Qaeda. Al Qaeda will be more than willing to accept the blame.

Comments

1
I am not sure where, but I recall reading about the al Qaeda website with the NFL dirty bomb threat last week. It was a newspaper site, Pakistan english newspaper, but don't remember the site name. I just wrote it off as nothing. Looks like the FBI didn't.

Posted by: bill at October 18, 2006 07:32 PM

2
Most realistic schemes for a dirty bomb work on the principle of making an area unlivable in the long-term due to the risk of chronic exposure over time, using comparatively small amounts of material that might be smuggled out of certain medical or research facilities. What this plan describes is a concentration of radioactive substances so great that those exposed are given a fatal exposure at the scene. Sort of like Chernobyl in a truck bomb. How exactly is anyone supposed to get hold of that much highly radioactive substance and drive it around the country undetected? Why couldn't people just look for truck drivers with lead overalls? Could they not follow the trail of truck stops where everyone is bald?

But then I suppose that if one is in the habit of believing anything such things might not be so hard to believe.

Good luck getting a truck anywhere near an NFL stadium anytime on gameday, or the day before for that matter. Tail-gating is just too much fun, and with so many involved, finding anywhere to park unless you are a regular is virtually impossible.

The truth that this javness fellow is a certifiable leader of the tinfoil-hat brigades is his idea that ANYONE with a truck can get anywhere near a stadium.... what a maroon.

Friggin f*cktard.....

I'd like to find out where this jerk lives and have a septic-pumper truck leave a deposit on his front lawn....

Respects,

Gwedd

Posted by: Gwedd at October 18, 2006 07:48 PM

4
"The Jawa Report can reveal the original dirty bomb THREAT (my emphasis added) against the NFL made (sic) by a 9/11 conspiracy 'truther'."

Are you sure it wasn't a prediction that spun out of control when hysterical idiots such as yourself ran with the "story"?

Posted by: Greg at October 18, 2006 08:59 PM

5
It occures to me that in this day and age and with the slack in every day security that it would be easier to get a truck close to a stadium then you might think. At face value I would not dismiss this...I know I wont and Ill be praying that this is all just a hoax...but the reality of the matter is that someone someday will manage to set one off in America...hopefully much later after my generation and my kids generation are long gone.

Posted by: Justme at October 18, 2006 09:05 PM

6
Can anyone verify whether there is a nuke reactor in any other city besides Atlanta?

Ga Tech has one on campus. Campus is downtown. There were peole who atteneded GT who are currently being held as part of a terrorist support ring or cell. Rusty knows what I am talking about.

So do any of these other cities have reactors near-by that are not utility power plants?

7
But greg at leastRusty got to the bottom or closer to the bottom than the MSM has. I'm still reading the MSM and they have not said it's bullshit yet.

Posted by: Howie at October 18, 2006 09:31 PM

8
Thye are saying not credible but not where or when it came from. ABC is reporting english language.

Posted by: Howie at October 18, 2006 09:34 PM

9
Oh and in my post ABC let the threads title slip in. If they had the title string (surely to god I hope so)ABC knew or I wouldexpect they would have known the source. Why then did they not scoop Rusty?

Posted by: Howie at October 18, 2006 09:38 PM

10
Rusty/Howie:
Is there any way to get the comments section consistent?
If you click on the "comments" section you only have the option to post, if you click on the direct topic link you get the "preview" and the "post" button.
It is annoying, because I always have to remember to click the topic link, versus the comments link so I can use the preview!

13
Might want to fix an actual problems with "timezones" -- that would be how the comment section timestamps are completely screwed up, and causing posts to be displayed out of order.

Only one man can help us now, Pixy ;/

Posted by: davec at October 18, 2006 10:49 PM

14
Has anybody noted the fact that the games at the seven stadiums/cities mentioned have different starting times? Kind of hard to threaten both New York and Seattle when the games start three hours apart... the only possible scenario for getting all of them would be to do it at the end of the eastern/central time-zone games and at the beginning of the western time-zone games. Otherwise, does anyone think games on the west coast would start if east coast stadiums had been bombed?

16
I think that could they do it is more important than if this threat is real or not. The ACLU lawsuits against searching may make it possible.

Posted by: Greyrooster at October 19, 2006 06:52 AM

17
Any future terrorist attacks in this country, the administration in charge will most definately be held responsible.

Politics played = promises made.

Posted by: QC at October 19, 2006 01:28 PM

18
Howie:" I'm still reading the MSM and they have not said it's bullshit yet."

Of course not. The MSM works for the government and the government wants to keep us in a perpetual state of fear, which you are all wallering in.

"The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself"...
because when we are afraid, the government passes shit like the Military Commissions Act.

Howie, do you realize that the "Noble Experiment" is over? You cowards let it slip away and you call yourselves patriots. Shame, shame. Is this what our fathers fought for? No way.

Posted by: Greg at October 19, 2006 02:03 PM

19
We seem to have wallered out of that one PDQ and it was a truther spreading the fear this time eh? I do smell the stench of politics on the DHS.

Posted by: Howie at October 19, 2006 02:08 PM

20
Greg:
The MSM works for the Government? are you that deluded?
The DHS informed the NFL of the threat, because it was the right thing to do, however unlikely the actual scenario -- the Media ran the coverage 24/7 despite the fact that DHS said they did not think it was legitimate.
You know who does profit from a climate of fear? the media, you've got to tune in, to find out if you might die today.

We are going to do what we want, when we want. Go to football games, drive across bridges, take trips in planes, trains, ships, and whatever else we want.

You mutherfuckers shut your mouths and protect us. There is no noble grandstanding. Only the noble have a shot at protecting us. If you fail, we will have your asses.

Posted by: QC at October 19, 2006 02:42 PM

22
Let me explian my politics comment. One could arggue that many ways the more I thought about it. Every political consideration from covering your ass to alarmism says yes release it. But the mainly holding your nose and covering your ass part. If any nut did do anything and the election just around the corner it was too unpredictable. There are more credible threats out there. So yes fear of the election (politicians fear mainly) is driving some judgement. It really can't hurt you if it's alarmism becuase of the better safe than sorry side. If the election were next year they never would have released it at all.