Question:
What does the possibility of life on Mars, the obvious and proven
clandestine behavior of the NASA/JPL Machine, and the upcoming Mars
encounter with 76P have in common?

With a
little fine tuning and perhaps a little inspiration, we seem to be getting
closer to the reality of what is being hidden from the tax payors about
Mars. In our previous article Marshall Masters made the statement that,
"...the people of the Earth will forever be denied knowledge that
could forever change our lives for the better." It is easy to see how
we have come to have such a lack of hope and such a great degree of
skepticism concerning not only Mars, but the entire space program.

Isn't the
search for another "human-like" species in the universe a big
part of NASA's focus, even if it is an unspoken ideal? Why else look for
planets in remote star systems, and why are there hundreds of home
computers, right at this moment, evaluating radio signals from deep space
for the SETI program? When we examine the question of life on Mars, we
need to first ask what kind of life are we talking about. It seems like
everyone beats around the bush here and never comes out and says it! I
think this gives the NASA folk some major room for movement. For instance,
I think most people became really excited to hear a few years ago that
life had been discovered from Mars. Of course the detail to that story was
that it was "maybe" a microbe, wasn't found on Mars, but rather
at the Antarctic. What kind of life is this? If this is alien life, then I
can comfortably say that planet earth is covered in it. In fact we have
creeping life, swimming life, and all kinds of intelligent life on the
earth that isn't human. So if NASA finds intelligent life on Mars, will
they come back later and say that it's a snake or just an amoeba? Think
about it a bit! You are likely aware of the fact that it was only as
recent as a decade ago, that we found previously unknown intelligent
bipeds, on the earth. In the forests and jungles of New Guinea there
exists a people that were not known to the general civilization of planet
earth until just a few years ago! Are we frightened to say that there
possibly exists proof of a past or even current civilization on Mars? I
know... nutzoid. But that's what the machine wants you to think. What we
have to say is not "nuts", but rather rational and factual.
That's why TMG is always a target of that same Machine.

As many
readers of our page may know, we have recently been involved in the
writings of Nostrodamus concerning The King of Terror. We stand by the
statements made in these postings. Meanwhile we have watched anxiously the
many developments on Mars. A few weeks ago, amidst all of these
revelations, I received a very insightful and interesting email from one
of our regular readers. Clearly it showed me that it's hard to see the
trees for the forest! I had a jolt of reality shoot through me from my
toes up to my head as I read the following:

"Dear Mr. Goodwin,
I am passing on some information for your consideration related to the
predicted close passage of a comet near Mars around June. As you stated
in your article at http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/mars/mars2.html
there is the possibility of a collision or the tearing of Phobos out of
orbit and into the inner solar system.

When I first read this article, I thought it strange that you
would bring up Nostradamus' 1999 quatrain since we are past 1999. I
asked myself "Could another interpretation of Nostradamus' quatrain
include the year 2000?" All of the many interpreters of the
following quatrain assume it refers to the summer of 1999, either July,
August or September: The year 1999 and seven months, From the sky will
come a Great King of Terror To resurrect the great King of Angoulmois.
Before and after Mars reigns with good luck.

They also assume that 'before and after' refers back to the first
line. That is, before and after the year 1999 and seven months, Mars
reigns with good luck. However, as I played around with the words, I
discovered an alternate connection between the date elements in the
first line and the two prepositions in the last line. It would read,
'After the year 1999 and before seven months, Mars reigns with good
luck.' In other words, June of 2000. Which brings us back to your
article.

You state that the comet will be closest to Mars on June 5th,
2000. If Phobos is pulled out of it's orbit, could it be the 'Great
King of Terror'? It means 'terror' in Greek.

Gordon Michael Scallion has predicted that Phobos will be pulled
from its orbit and make a very close approach to Earth, even slicing
through its upper atmosphere, causing earth changes. He saw it in a
lucid dream and wrote, 'the entire planet shudders from the shock wave
of the moon's deflected impact.' He also describes winds reaching 200
miles per hour, tidal waves a mile or more in height racing across
continents, and the shapes of continents and water bodies changing.

The possibility of Phobos leaving its orbit is not that
far-fetched. It has an unstable opposing orbit. That is, the direction
of its orbit is opposite the direction of rotation of Mars. It wouldn't
take much for a passing object, like the comet, to pull it away.

'Name Withheld'"

Alright...
There it is... Phobos = Terror. Phobos is Greek for Terror!

Regardless
of how we look at it, there seems to be a flashpoint or a "coming
together of events" if you will, surrounding the Mars issue. But to
clearly and coherently see the picture we must seriously consider as many
of these important events and issues as possible. In our previous
installment, Marshall Masters brought out many of the most salient points
relevant to our effort. We must continue on - filling in every point and
every building block to reach a believable and comfortable conclusion.
Here I present a few more, for the case of Mars.

Working
Backwards: A Silence is Heard

As I have
stated, there seems to be a heightened fervor over Mars the last few
months. It may be the loss of contact with recent Mars' projects, or it
may be the coming comet 76P. We should surely consider the ongoing and
undying issue of Cydonia. And now comes NASA's bitter determination to put
a hold on any info out of the Mars' projects:

Sunday May 7 12:02 PM ETNASA Changes Mars Exploration Plans
By MATTHEW FORDAHL,
AP Science Writer PASADENA, Calif. (AP) - After a pair of high-profile
Mars mission flops, NASA is rethinking its approach to the Red Planet in
an unprecedented review that includes everything from science and
technology to management and bureaucracy. When the soul-searching is
done, officials say they will have reinvented the program that helped
doom the $125 million Mars Climate Orbiter and the $165 million Polar
Lander. A team of NASA experts, contractors and university leaders is
working on recommendations they hope to have ready this summer, said Ed
Weiler, NASA's associate administrator for space science. <http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20000507/sc/exp_mars_future_1.html>

"Rethinking"
sounds a whole lot like "kabosh" to this writer. Interesting
that the talk will stop just before the 76P encounter with Mars.

It may seem
to some readers these are an unrelated set of non-issues. But the story is
there if you are just willing to listen...

The
Deep Space One mission was put together as the first of a number of
missions to display JPL's new attitude of lower spending - more bang for
the buck - so to speak. The original mission was to do fly-bys of asteroid
McAuliffe, Mars (including a fly-by of Phobos), and comet 76P. That's
correct - 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura! It was scheduled for launch July 1st,
1998. I say 'was' because the schedule was supposedly changed. More on
that in a bit. You can see why I have suggested that there is a
"coming together of events". At the time we wrote about 76P and
its close encounter with Mars, I had completely forgotten about DS1. One
of the reasons that this had slipped my mind, was that the original
mission had been changed and played down. Bad press is bad press, and JPL
doesn't need anymore of it!

The launch
was changed to October of 98 and the objectives were changed. Here is a
report of that change:

"NASA 's Deep Space One
(DS1) spacecraft is scheduled to be launched in 1998 to travel to
asteroid McAuliffe in 1999 and the comet West-Kohoutek-Ikemura in 2000.
DS1 is the first scheduled mission in the NASA New Millennium program,
which is designed to test and validate cutting edge technology for the
systems and instruments on-board future NASA science spacecraft. The
artificial intelligence (AI), Remote Agent, software on board DS1 is
being developed at NASA Ames Research Center in collaboration with
spacecraft engineers and computer scientists at the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena, CA. Remote Agent is the first AI system that
will control a spacecraft."

Update: 8-26-98 The new launch date for Deep Space One is
Oct. 15, 1998. According to Dr. Marc D. Rayman, DS1 Deputy Mission
Manager at JPL, "Earlier this year the mission was changed so that
McAuliffe and West-Kohoutek-Ikemura are no longer the targets. . . . the
encounters are not the focus of the mission and are not even in the NASA
level-1 requirements nor in the NASA success criteria. Nevertheless, we
will attempt to encounter asteroid 1992 KD in July 1999. The primary
mission concludes in September 1999. If the spacecraft is healthy and
NASA continues the mission, the spacecraft may be on a path that would
allow an encounter with comet Wilson-Harrington and comet Borrelly in
2001."

Among the
experiments on the vehicle is an integrated ultraviolet and infrared
spectrograph, a camera, and plasma analyzer. An interesting combination of
experiments when you consider some of the things I have for you in this
posting, such as the growing atmosphere of Mars and the apparent
destruction of previous Martian satellites. But let's stay on course here
and not get ahead of ourselves!

In other
articles we have suggested the idea that NASA and/or JPL have an idea that
they may be able to alter or change the trajectory of asteroids and/or
comets. In one sense this would seem like a good idea to begin working on.
There have been few sound ideas developed that could actually protect the
Earth from a severe impact. But it seems logical that the sooner you
attack the problem, the more likely you are to decrease the odds of a hit.
So we put forth this idea with our exploration of the reasoning of putting
72 pounds of plutonium on the satellite Cassini (Is
Cassini a Kamikaze Deep Space Probe?).
Again, when we wrote about 76P and exposed the narrow encounter about to
occur with Mars, we had no thought that DS1 was headed that way. The next
day after posting the info on the close encounter, we were lambasted by
the Machine. The original ephemeris was modified and the figure of 4
million miles (0.0431) was introduced. Everyone was apparently told to
fall in line and had to make a statement that, "76P will most
definitely NOT hit Mars." So is this just another coincidence? How
many coincidences make up a fact? Is there a formula for something like
that (C x X = f)? Here are the choices that come to my mind:

Either
they intend to change 76P's trajectory to:

attempt
to have 76P impact Mars, eradicating any evidence of historical
life or life itself,

or
to change the trajectory away from Mars to avoid an impact.

Or, they
are examining it to see what kind of changes they can expect if it
comes very close to Mars.

But the
fact is, because of the so-called halt on the projects (let me remind you
that this really means the door is shut and the meeting's going on on the
other side of that door), we may never know for sure. Or will we?

The
Military Agenda

The Deep
Space Program was started at JPL to do space exploration more efficiently
with lower costs - we are told. However there are some more coincidences
that continue to pop up! It's becoming very hard to keep the lid on this
monster. As Richard Hoagland has pointed out so effectively, the JPL - Cal
Tech Oversight Committee is headed by Admiral Bobby Inman <http://www.enterprisemission.com/whosnasa.html>.
So there's not much argument about who's calling the shots on the Mars
projects.

So why, so
much military involvement in the various Mars' projects?

Here's
another kicker: The company that developed the DS1, Spectrum Astro, Inc.,
is primarily a military space manufacturing company. According to their
homepage Spectrum Astro:

"Founded as a research and development company in 1988,
Spectrum Astro, Inc. today is a diversified, full service aerospace
corporation specializing in the development of high performance,
lower-cost space systems for sophisticated defense, scientific and
commercial opportunities."

Spectrum's
first public space launch was DS1. Their next satellite, coming up for
launch is one that you have probably heard of also. It is unfortunately
known for a negative distinction - when the satellite was being tested by
NASA it was nearly obliterated by a vibration machine that shook it
several hundred times harder than it should've been shaken!

So we have
a military committee hiring a military manufacturing company to explore
Mars. The timing appears to suggest that Spectrum was a company set up, or
at least supported in some manner, by the oversight committee for this
exact need.

During the
mid seventies, with the addition of the Viking info coming to light, the
move to militarize the Mars program was being put into place. I single out
the Mars program, because we know that there have been other projects into
space by the military long before the Mars situation. But this was one cat
that was trying to come out of the bag with claws and teeth, and the
campaign had to be put in place before the United States tax paying
audience became too interested. As Marshall stated in the last
installment, "The possibility that life could exist on Mars was
already known before the Viking Lander ever touched down, and contingency
plans had already been laid out to suppress any evidence, while giving the
appearance of a open process."

Maybe it's
just another interesting tidbit (or coincidence) that in 1988 Spectrum
Astro was founded. This military company was organized, even though its
first satellite wasn't launched until 1998, just before the arrival of
76P.

One
They'd Like To Forget

During the
same period that Spectrum was being founded the heat was about to be
turned up on the Mars controversy. Many newbies to the Mars ordeal may not
be aware of this event, so let us bring it back into the forefront!

Something
was still brewing on Mars in the late 80's, regardless of the
"lack" of attention that the story was getting. There were
however, still a few hacking away at the "face on Mars" issue,
but for all real intent it was drowning. The military, I'm sure, just
wanted it to totally go away and they were no doubt very proud of their
accomplishments in doing so, up to this point. But someone with more
ability than the American Public was also interested in the goings on
around Mars. It was the Russians. The good old Russians! Maybe they just
wanted to put a burr in the military's side. Or maybe they heard it
through the grapevine (polite for the Intelligence Community) that there
was something up there and they had to see for themselves. There was something
that prompted them to take two Venera Satellites out of mothballs and send
them directly for Mars.

The
interesting thing is this: their interests lie primarily with Martian moon
Phobos. Thus the satellites were named Phobos 1 and Phobos 2. The
satellites were sturdy - another euphemism! They were said to be
built like Russian tanks! There was more hardware and shielding on these
sats than anything we build. Again - those good old Russians! Actually,
others of the same type and build went to Venus and to the comet Haley. So
they had to be pretty tough.

The first
of the two - Phobos 1 was lost in transit to Mars. No explanation was ever
really given - communications or something like that. It was just lost.
But let me pause here and say, whenever I hear this I get very suspicious.
I'm sorry I just don't trust government anymore to tell us the truth - any
government. Yes, it's a real character deficit. But that doesn't make me a
conspiracy nut. I'm still trying to understand why FBI agents allowed the
Waco women and children to be gassed and burned to death. I know 'allowed'
is not the right word. But I digress!

The image
above is of Phobos 2, however one and two were identical. Phobos 2 did
make it to Mars. It was supposed to put two instrument packetts on the
moon Phobos, but was lost upon approaching within 50M of the moon. The
project goals were:

So why the
rush to get there? Not one satellite with the same goals, but two. What
was there that they had to see right away? Of course there is controversy.
Here's just a few interesting occurrences and events surrounding Phobos
two:

Prior to
P2's rendezvous with the Martian moon Phobos, it took a number of
photos of the surface of Mars. One such photo was an infrared image
showing subsurface canals and a network of crisscrossing parallel lines.
The area was near the equator and covered about 600 square kilometers. Dr.
John Becklake of the London Science Museum said it could easily be
mistaken for an aerial photo of Los Angeles. The photo is not available.

As the
satellite moved closer to Phobos to attempt to dispatch the two probes,
had cameras rolling (video cameras!), and picked up and transmitted images
of something we might call a UFO. Contact was lost and the satellite
assumed destroyed.

There are
so many incredible and outlandish stories about Phobos (the moon) we
cannot cover them here. It seems difficult to believe that all of these
stories, many by reputable sources and many by NASA/JPL/U.S. Military
Machine themselves, could be false.

Phobos
orbits Mars almost perfectly around its equator. But unlike other moons
and planets in the solar system, it orbits Mars entirely opposite to the
rotation of Mars! Some have conjectured that it is a captured asteroid and
not a part of the original accretion disk (that molten disk of material
that cooled and became the planets - not a belief of TMG!). It has one
huge crater and some very curios striations on its surface.

One
important and very interesting statement about Phobos is as follows:"Joseph Shklovskii noted member of the Soviet Academy of science
and co-writer with Dr Carl Sagan of 'Intelligent life in the universe',
once calculated from the estimated density of the Martian atmosphere and
the peculiar "acceleration" of Phobos, that the satellite must
be hollow. Could Phobos be a hollowed-out space station of huge
proportions?" Marina Popovich, Ph.D., a retired Russian Colonel,
has given statements supporting this claim. Colonel Popovich was a
decorated airforce pilot that smuggled a number of images and other sets
of data out of Russia. You can see a more detailed account of these
instances by clicking HERE.

Upon
approaching the moon the last thing that was imaged by the satellite seems
to be an old familiar image to some of us here at TMG. In reports the
object was said to have spindles and as the Russians stated, "It
should have not been there." You can click on the image at the right
to see the full image or click here <UNEXPLAINED
SOLAR ANOMALY('S)> to read the full story. We at TMG have continued
to see these anomalies on and off for over the last two years. The one
that is depicted to the right has been said to be pixel bleed, due to
excessive exposure. However we have disputed this due to the apparent back
lighting of the object and variations in the pixel saturation from lighter
to dark. In other words, we believe this object to be stationed (in this
image) between the earth and the sun.

The claim
by the Russians was that Phobos 2 was "shot out of orbit" by
some type of plasma weapon upon approaching the Martian moon. You should
know that Colonel Popovich claimed that the Russians had planned on taking
action against what ever it was that was in or around Mars and Phobos. All
of these claims are speculative and of course unfounded. However there was
one image released of the object just immediately prior to the demise of
the satellite.

The
image (to the left) shows a "tower-like" bright light extending
toward the satellite, between the satellite and Phobos. But the source is
not seen in the image.

These
tower-like structures, as previously stated, have been seen in many images
from the YUKOH and SOHO solar satellites. The explanation has always been
pixelation, as stated above. This image is from a Russian newspaper first
seen a number of years ago on the Larry King Live show. A larger an
complete image of the article can be seen by clicking on the image.

It's
difficult to see how pixelation could cause what is being seen here. These
anomalies, added to the many already known and including the recent
so-called failures, add to an already suspicious mindset. Is it possible
that none of these satellites failed? Who would know? I only suggest this
as a possibility. The likelihood is that many failed while some are still
gathering data. But why did they fail? Why is it that we do not already
have a manned mission on the surface of Mars? There is something sorely
lacking in the explanations that we, the tax paying public have been
subject to.

A Past
Great Civilization? Life?

In our last
posting by Marshall Masters, Marshall mentions the altering of the Viking
images to show an unreal red vista. Of course most people accepted the
poorly colored image - it's Mars right? The RED planet? Below is an
original high resolution image from the Viking Lander. The next image is
one sent to me by an avid reader, with the hue modified to likely show the
original or REAL view.

Of
course this doesn't prove much, but it does show what is possible with the
right tools. With the right tools, we as a people can be influenced to
believe anything. Maybe the reason for hiding the truth is to protect us.
Yeah right. But the question of a past civilization on Mars would cause
great consternation to people everywhere. To those that still think that
the earth is at the center of the universe, both physically and
philosophically, this would be shattering. To those in power (whom I
believe already know the answer), the existence of a past intelligent
civilization would be - simply - an opportunity. And usually when
opportunities arise, they take whatever measures possible to
control it and then to methodically exploit every possible avenue of that
resource. Such is the case with earthly resources such as oil, land, labor
and economics. There's really no need to establish this fact here at this
time. It is well known.

If
there was civilization on Mars at one time, and it is appearing more and
more that the evidence is irrefutable, there will no doubt be invaluable
resources there. This is likely the case because the civilization would
not have little green men nor gray aliens. Little green men and gray
aliens are not what TMG is about. If a civilization did exist at one time
on Mars, it would have likely been a humanoid race. But that explanation
is for another time and another posting. Regardless of what race occupied
Mars, it is evident that there was once a great catastrophe on the planet.
Stones strewn across the landscape and evidence of weathered architecture.
These are the evidences that are left.

But
why accept that the civilization is no longer there? We have been told
over and over that the atmosphere is violent if nonexistent. No water to
be seen - only an essence of such. But there are stories of a hollow moon
(Phobos) and underground canals and structures. Maybe their still there.
Sounds like science fiction! But why can't we prove it once and for all?
Maybe we have - we just don't know it!

Are We
Protecting Something, Or Hoping That Something Will Be Destroyed?

This
image was taken by the HST just after the passage of a large energetic
comet a couple of years ago (remember this fact - it's important!). Just a
couple of questions here: If Mars has no atmosphere, why are there obvious
clouds on the surface? What happens to water in a zero pressure
atmosphere?

Take note
of the cyclonic cloud on the planet, just to the left and below the
northern ice cap. The cloud not only appears to be spinning, but also has
what we refer to as an "eye". Yes... this is a hurricane on
Mars. This isn't a manufactured image - this is real. In all of history,
there is not one recorded instance of a hurricane. Let's call it Hurricane
Alpha.

Just as a
comparison, consider Hurricane Mitch of the 99 hurricane season, a
category 5+ hurricane. Mitch dumped over six feet of rain within a few
hours. The eye of Hurricane Mitch at one point measured 50 miles in
diameter. These are ways that we can compare the energy and output of the
storms. We can begin to develop a baseline when we look at other
hurricanes in comparison to Mitch. For instance, there were two Philippine
typhoons (Pacific Hurricanes) in the 98' season that each dumped
approximately 20 inches of rain. The eye wall diameter on these hurricanes
measured an average of 30 miles. It is our belief that the eye is the
point of electrical charge dispersal from the upper atmosphere to the
earth below. Therefore you can measure the amount of electrical charge in
a storm by the size of the eye and amount of hydrogen combined with
oxygen/ozone (water!) the storm dumps. Since we are doing a simple
comparison there is no need to use the entire formula for area of the eye
- we need to only compare the squares of the radius. Thus the area of
Mitch's eye is 25miles squared = 625 miles. If you measure the area of the
hurricane eye on Mars (in the image above), as compared to the size of the
planet, you come up with the conservative figure of 250 miles in diameter
or 125 miles radius. For ease sake and to squeeze it down another
conservative notch, let's just call it 100 miles radius. So comparing with
Mitch we have 100 miles squared = 10,000 miles! To figure the difference
or the ratio between the power of Mitch as compared to the power of
Hurricane Alpha, or 10,000 divided by 625 you get a figure of about 16
times. In other words, if you can't follow my mathematical gibberish,
Hurricane Alpha on Mars is 16 times more powerful than Mitch! That's quite
a wallop if you realize that Mars is considerably smaller than the Earth.

Please
stay with me on this one. This is very important considering the upcoming
encounter with 76P. First some more questions. If this hurricane is so
large - and we truly believe that it is/was - where did the water for the
storm come from? Where did the water go from the storm? Afterall, this
means that Hurricane Alpha dumped 16X's the amount of water than Mitch
did! What if it only dumped half of the water - say 8X's six feet of
water. Where is it? It is important to note that the above mentioned
satellite - Phobos 2 and another recent trip to Mars - The Surveyor - have
both mapped underground canals with infrared cameras. On Earth there are
numerous aquifers or underground lakes of water ("The fountains of
the deep").

"Red
planet receives an 'MRI'
By Richard Stenger CNN Interactive Staff Writer March 10, 2000
Web posted at: 1:50 p.m. EST (1850 GMT) GREENBELT, Maryland (CNN)
When Mars was young, enormous water flows could have created the
extensive underground channels revealed in images of the martian
interior derived from Mars Global Surveyor data, NASA researchers said.
-- Peering under the surface of Mars with new laser-assisted techniques,
NASA scientists have uncovered evidence of wide, ancient channels that
could have formed from the flow of enormous volumes of water, the space
agency announced Friday. NASA also unveiled dramatic video simulations
of the surface of the red planet, taking viewers on a breathtaking ride
over features like the Valles Marineris, a chasm as long as the United
States, and the north polar cap, which holds as much water as the Great
Lakes. "It's just a spectacular, otherworldly landscape," NASA
scientist Jim Garvin told CNN. "We are seeing the real Mars, making
science fiction science fact.
"It's like seeing the human body with an MRI (Magnetic Resonance
Image). Without drilling into the surface, we can see beneath what we
see from space," said Garvin, who works for NASA's Goddard Space
Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. The new data from the orbiter
suggest that at some point in the planet's history, the flat northern
lowlands suffered blistering heat, experienced rapid cooling, then
drowned under floods that formed an ocean. The planet "was in
a tremendous state of upheaval," Garvin said. Channels beneath the
northern lowlands could have flowed from Valles Marineris and the Chryse
and Kasei Valles regions, NASA scientists said. The researchers used
gravity and elevation measurements from MGS to spot the features, about
125 miles (200 km) wide and more than 1,000 miles (1,600 km) long. Water
flowing on the surface or underground in channels and later buried by
sediments could explain the appearance of the features. Their large size
suggests that part or parts of the northern lowlands rapidly filled with
water. "

Another
indication that hurricanes are electrically powerful storms and that this
charge is passed through the earth's crust and from above through the
atmosphere, is the example of this past years' hurricanes off of the east
coast of the U.S.. If you recall, we had one of the most devistating
hurricanes in many years this last season. There were two hurricanes that
traveled over the entire east coast, one was Floyd. These storms caused
immense flooding and untold damage. They carried with them a great charge
being distributed and equalized throughout the crust - primarily along the
eastern seaboard. And amazingly, a new discovery with far reaching
indications was announced just a few weeks ago. Here is the report as we
posted it on Hal Blondell's New Millennium Bulletin:

"Cracks
Discovered in Ocean Floor
Associated Press May 2, 2000; 5:55 a.m. EDT FALMOUTH, Mass.
Scientists have discovered cracks in the ocean floor off the East Coast
that they say could trigger a tsunami, sending 18-foot waves toward the
mid-Atlantic states. In this month's issue of the journal Geology, the
three researchers say they discovered the cracks along a 25-mile section
of the continental shelf off the Virginia and North Carolina coasts.
Those areas and the lower Chesapeake Bay would be at the highest risk
for wave heights similar to the storm surge of a category 4 hurricane,
which is characterized by top sustained winds of 131 mph to 155 mph.
Neal Driscoll of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on Cape Cod,
Jeffrey Weissel of Columbia University and John Goff of the University
of Texas said the recently discovered cracks could mean the continental
shelf is unstable.
The cracks indicate the sea floor could slide down like an avalanche,
triggering giant waves. It's unclear whether the cracks are fossil
features or whether they are still active, Driscoll said. The scientists
plan an expedition this weekend to gather more information to better
determine the risk to the coast.
A tsunami in Papua New Guinea killed 2,000 people in 1998."

Was it the
dumping of the charge into the area of the east coast the cause of the
newly discovered rift? It seems that a feature such as this - a feature
which could cause such a tidal wave - would've been known to scientists
for sometime. This area is heavily traveled by the Navy. Would you think
that they would simply have NOT noticed? I sincerely believe that the rift
was the direct result of electrical dumping by solar storms, via
hurricanes.

[P.S. Over
the past two days 5/16-5/17/00, there has been a powerful solar storm
occuring. Today, 5/18/00, the weather went wild in the midwest. Even a
catagory 4 tornado in Nebraska! THERE IS A CONNECTION!]

Is what is
happening on Mars history? Or rather is this a current event on Mars? Is
there a great amount of water just under the surface of Mars? Are there
great spaces and expanses (cave-like structures) under the surface?

Also to be
taken into consideration - forever we were taught that Mons Olympus was
the tallest mountain on Mars. In the last few years they have began to say
that there is another mountain taller. Could there be a dynamic and
changing crust on Mars? Hydrostatic pressure could account for much of
what we have discussed. The canals discovered are over a mile wide and
many miles deep and lie several miles under the surface. It appears with
each passing comet that the surface of Mars is changing along with its
atmosphere. Mars is terraforming.

Classical
explanations of Mars' atmosphere have taught us that the atmosphere of
Mars is only 1/100th that of the Earth's, or only 1-2% that of the
Earth's. And further we were taught that the field of Mars is only 1/800th
of the Earth. The Mars Surveyor Mission itself has shown us that this is
just not the case any longer. In order to save the satellite from being
dragged down to the surface and crashing, the satellite had to be
literally raised in its orbit. These figures are just no longer valid.
Mars is terraforming.

In past
postings we have established the electrical connection between the Sun and
Venus. We have also been witness to the flux tube connection between
Jupiter and its moon Io. In fact the strong activity between Jupiter and
Io is believed to be responsible for the great amount of volcanic activity
on Io. Io orbits Jupiter at 400,000 miles. We are currently estimating
that comet 76P will come within 40,000 miles of Mars. When Hale Bopp
passed through the solar system, one of the greatest dust storms ever,
occurred on Mars. When Lee came through we saw the first hurricane ever on
Mars. Will 76P be "sucked" into the planet from the charge well?
Or will there be a connection made between the two that will cause great
damage to the planet. Or will it increase the apparent terraforming going
on? Close to the same time that the comet passes Mars, the comet will pass
through the ecliptic. It is a known fact that when comets pass through the
strong electrical environment of the ecliptic, comets often fall apart.
Velikovsky has theorized that there was a great "war" between
the comet Venus and Mars many years ago. The closest known passage of a
comet to the Earth was in the year 1491 at a distance of 0.0094. That's a
considerably further distance than 76P will pass Mars.

And what
was the purpose of sending Deep Space One to the comet? Did it really go
to the comet? Or was it reassigned like they tell us? Would they possibly
believe that they could redirect the comet closer or farther away from
Mars? I wouldn't put it past them!

Maybe the
comet will not affect the planet. Maybe it will yank Phobos free. If it
does, where will it go? Just maybe their plan to affect the planet Mars
through the actions of 76P will backfire. Seems like all of the satellites
that they send there have been wasted effort. Or have they?

What
are they hiding?

Gary d.
goodwin
Ray Ward
M-Core

The
Millennium Group Mars Exploration Propositions:

PROPOSITION 1: ACCESS TO EXPLORATION INFORMATION: We call
upon our government, who have been formally elected to be our
representatives to the nation and the world, to provide us with
unfettered and timely access to the information created by all space
exploration efforts. We make this call for information because the
survival of the species must be decided by the species and not by
those seeking power through proprietary control of information that
rightfully belongs to the peoples of the world.

PROPOSITION 2 : EXPLORATION OF MARS: The citizens of the
United States now enjoy a surplus of prosperity that we as a nation
have not known before. For this reason, we now dedicate a
substantial portion of our budgetary surplus to immediate funding of
an international effort to establish a permanent community on the
planet Mars for the benefit of all mankind.