After 62 years of india's independence the lives of commoners is far worse than under britishers. The benefits of independence has reached only few , thus creating islands of few ultra rich people surrounded by vast sea of utterly poor. The rich people in nexus with those in power , are getting favourable laws enacted to suit their ends. Those in power are shamelessly enjoying 5-star luxuries all at tax payer's expense , while more then 50 million are starving to death.

The criminalization of politics , executive & judiciary is almost complete. The corruption has spread it's tentacles far & wide , there is corruption from womb to tomb ,from maternity hospital to grave yard. The injustices meated out , the atrocities perpetrated by by public servants are worse than britishers.

Ideally in a democracy, the legal recourse of grievance redressal / justice , when a commoner suffers injustice he can appeal to respective government official or police for justice , still if doesn't get justice he can appeal to court of law , further the aggrieved can get the appropriate law enacted through his M.P / M.L.A. The sad part in India is no public servant is neither aware of the value of our hard won independence or the working of democracy.

When all the legal recourses to justice fail to respond , to provide justice to the aggrieved , when corrupt judges-police-politician-public servants act as a criminal nexus & block justice delivery, the commoner has only 2 options , either to suffer in silence or to take law into his own hands & get justice on his own.

Take for instance Bombay riots case several VVIPs – cabinet ministers , police were found to be guilty of torture , murders of innocents by justice sri Krishna enquiry commission. The government is sitting over enquiry commission report. The court is not taking suo-motto action in public interests a result , the guilty ministers & police who are fit cases for death sentences are roaming free & commiting more crimes , anti-national activities.

In some cases , involving the rich &mighty ,higher police officials , the cover-up begins right from start ie FIR Registration. Police conduct name sake enquiry , investigation, suppress evidences , witnesses , destroy some of them , the prosecution takes a favourable stand putting up weak arguments. Naturally, the guilty official , minister is acquitted by court for lack of evidences. So, the guilty who should have been rightfully put behind bars , hanged goes scot-free , to commit more crimes , more anti-national activities.

In such cases , if the suffering public give the legal punishment to the guilty , which should have been given by the court but failed. Are not such acts of public, to uphold law & dignity , national security right & patriotic ? if any body terms it as crime , that means guilty VVIPs , police , public servants should be left unpunished allowing them to commit more crimes , anti-national activities. Is that right from national security angle ? is it equality before law & equitable justice ?

In this back drop , in India anarchy is not far away. The days of suffering public ,killing their tormentors corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt tax officials ,etc is not far away. No police security , no SPG cover can protect those corrupt , as police & SPG personnel work for pay , perks and will be on the wrong side of law – protecting criminals. The suffering public fighting for their survival , on the right side of natural justice , protecting the nation.

If the authorities term this act as illegal , crime then are the acts of corrupt public servants legal ? is the cover-up of such corrupt acts by police , vigilance officials & some judges by mis quoting /misinterpreting , misusing law is right , legal ? the GOI has created , funded , supported , given training , arms & ammunition to various terrorist outfits like LTTE , MUKTHI BAHINI ,MQM in foreign countries , resulting in destruction , mass murders of innocents there . In india itself in assam , Kashmir , the GOI has created counter terrorist outfits to reduce the reach of terrorist groups. The bihar , jharkhand , chattisgarh state governments have created armed gangs SALWA JUDUM to counter naxal outfits , are all these acts of government right , legal ? the days of dogs death for corrupt is quite nearby. it is high time , to the corrupt to reform , repent themselves.

In our own experience, e-voice didn't get justice from authorities in many cases of injustices brought before it , most shameful fact even supreme court of India failed to register PILs , even shameful supreme court of India even failed to give information as per RTI Act , utterly shameful supreme court of India failed to protect the fundamental rights of editor of e-voice & obstructed him from performing his fundamental duties. Still, e-voice believes in peace , democratic practices. E-voice firmly believes that violence should not be practiced by anybody – neither state nor public.

CRIMES COMMITTED BY LAW COURTS IN INDIA- An appeal to honourable supreme court of india

Indian prisons are meant to be reforming schools for the prisoners. By the corrupt practices of the officials , the prisons have become factories turning out hardened criminals.

Say , a person was caught by police on suspicion of pick-pocketing. The police produce the accussed before the magistrate , in turn he remands him for judicial custody. Let us consider , The punishment for this offence pick-pocketing as per law is 6 months imprisonment. However the case drags on for 3 years , finally the court finds him guilty of offence & orders for 6 months imprisonment. Totally, the offender serves 42 months imprisonment sentence in practice. In some cases , the courts consider the time already spent by the accussed behind the bars while giving judgement. In this example , even if the offender is let free taking 6 months imprisonment sentence, the offender has been given excess sentence of 36-6=30 months.

Taking the same example further, say the court finds the accused as innocent, not guilty of crime & lets him free. However , the poor chap has suffered 36 months imprisonment for no fault of his.

As per law, no body not even the courts of law are legally empowered to punish anybody beyond the legal procedures , rules established. In this way, due to delay in our legal system , faulty bail procedures , thousands of under-trials are suffering in various prisons throught India. Arew not the courts which remanded those accused to judicial custody responsible for this illegal act of excessive punishment ? what punishment should be given to those judges ?

The bail procedure in India , is also faulty without considering quantum of offence & financial status of the accused. A person accused of stealing rs.100 has to provide bail surety bond of rs.5000 or personal surety by a wealthy person / government servant. The poor person having personal contacts , friendship with rich persons / government servants is quite remote , so he can'nt secure bail on personal bond. The poor chaps family is not rich enough to spend rs.5000 surety amount. As a result, unable to secure bail the poor chap suffers in jail for years.

Say, a rich industrialist is accused of rs.20 crores tax evasion, he is let free on a personal bond of rs.1 lakh. Stamp paper scam kingpin karim lala telgi has swindled government to the tune of thousands of crores of rupees, only few cases are registered against him. That too in one out of those cases involving rs.45 lakh worth stamp sale , judge has given him rigorous imprisonment plus a fine of rs.50000.

Considering the above examples it is quite clear the bail amount, fine amount are peanuts for the rich just a fraction of quantum of their crime , while for the poor it is huge many times more than the quantum of their crime.. it is biased towards rich & mighty criminals. As a result poor always suffers in jail, while rich are out on bail.

Even within prisons , the number of prisoners per sq.ft area , no of doctors , hospital beds , medicines available, weight of food per day given to prisoners , are all less & much below the statuotary limits. The food , health care , living conditions of prisoners , under-trials are worse than pigs. The prison authorities are utterly corrupt, which has been brought into light again & again by the media. If a poor prisoner questions the illegal acts of the officials , he is subjected to 3rd degree torture , roughed up by rowdy prisoners on the instigation of the officials themselves. Many poor prisoners are suffering from health problems , many are dying due to lack of proper health care & food in the prisons.

Whereas , the rich & mighty prisoners , by payting bribe get non-veg , alchoholic drinks from outside restaurants daily. They even secure drugs . they get spacious VIP rooms , television , mobile phones. They easily get parole & easily gets admitted in outside hospitals & roam free , while on record they are in-patients in hospitals.

The law of limitation which stipulates time limits for filing various cases is also biased towards the government as a party & rich , mighty. For the purposes of evidences , filing of cases one needs various government records. The concerned officials don't provide those records for years unless bribed & sit over the files for years. Some times by making absurd , illogical file notings , rejects it back. There is no time limit for the performance of duties by public servants. When a commoner donï¿½t get relevant records , files , evidences in time , how can he file cases in time without those records , evidences ?

Nowadays , numerous cases of irregularities , charges of corruption against judges are coming to light. However , in such cases judges are asked to resign from service but no criminal prosecution against them is instituted , only in cases involving lower court judges it is done. When a case of irregularity by a judge in a specific present case comes , there are every possibility that in the past also he has committed the same in cases handled by him which has not come to light. In such instances , all the cases handled by that particular judge throught his career must be reviewed , but is not done why ? does not it amount to cover-ups ?

In many cases the higher courts have turned down the verdicts of the lower courts , let free the innocents , absolved innocents of charges & annulled death sentences when appeals came before them. However , in all such cases , the lower court judges must be punished for giving out wrong judgements, meating out injustice to innocents. Here a fact must be noted , only a fraction of cases goes in appeal to higher courts, as in majority of cases the poor people lack the financial might to make the appeal. The so-called free legal services authority pre-judges the cases before giving legal aid. As a result , many innocents poor people resign to their fates suffer injustice in courts of law , undergo imprisonment punishment , some times even death sentence. So , the urgent need of the hour is to incorporate jury system or some outside monitoring system to review cases as & when decided.

In many cases involving the rich & mighty like telgi , case proceedings are conducted in-camera in judge's chambers or proceedings are conducted through video conferencing . outside from public gaze. The tapes are not made public and the public cann't even ascertain the validity of tapes , whether it is edited , doctored .

One of the basic reasons for delayed justice & worse prison conditions in India , is low number of judges , police personnel , higher rate of case adjournments and finally low amount of financial grants made by the government to judicial department / police department. The government states that it doesn't have enough money to provide for judiciary & police. As a result, fundamental / human rights of innocent commoners are thwarted. The state governments & GOI , is one of either parties in 75% of cases before various courts in India, it is the biggest litigant & is influencing the judiciary by controlling the grants , recruitment to judiciary & by enticing some with post-retirement postings.

We at HRW has utmost respect for the judiciary , but hereby humbly bringing the crimes of judiciary before the honest few judges seeking justice to the common folk.

Indian judiciary's contempt for accountability and scrutiny is a shame

The Delhi High Court on September 21, 2007 sentenced the editor, the resident editor, the publisher and the cartoonist of English daily Mid-Day guilty in a contempt of court case. The charge against the convicted journalists was that they published a report and a cartoon concerning the former Chief Justice of India, Mr. Y.K. Sabharwal. The report and the cartoon were published after Mr. Sabharwal retired from service.The report, relying upon documentary evidence, alleged that the judge's two sons Mr. Chetan and Mr. Nitin had made material benefits out of their father's position in the Indian judiciary as a senior judge and also as the Chief Justice of the country. The report alleged that the judge's sons managed their business from their father's official residence at 6 Moti Lal Nehru Marg, New Delhi. The report further alleged that the Chetan and Nitin also availed huge loans from a nationalised bank in favour of their business concerns without providing adequate collateral security. There were also allegations that the judge's two sons were allotted prime land by the Uttar Pradesh state government with heavy price concessions, an act which was under investigation. The investigation was however stayed later by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court of India is known for using the constitutional mandate and authority to initiate actions of public interest. The court in the past has even taken note of newspaper reports to initiate suo motu actions against suspected breach of law and misuse of office by public servants. This earnestness and enthusiasm has not been thus far reflected in the Indian courts' approach against scrutinising the activities of the courts and its judges. On the contrary, the Indian courts have been very parochial in its approach in facing criticism. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of India had forced Mr. Vijay Shekhar, a journalist with a television news channel, who exposed the caucus of a corrupt magistrate, his court staff and some lawyers in Gujarat state in the "Warrants for Cash" scam to apologise to the court or to face a term in jail for contempt of court. The court staff and the lawyers were caught on camera negotiating and accepting bribe for the magistrate for issuing arrest warrants. In the episode which was telecast nationwide, the magistrate after accepting bribes, issued arrest warrants on false charges against the President of India and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.The Supreme Court took up the matter and directed the Gujarat High Court to initiate an internal enquiry against the concerned judicial officer and his staff. The judge was however absolved by the Gujarat High Court without examining the complainants. Thereafter, the Supreme Court of India condemned the journalist who had carried out this operation and threatened to send him to jail for contempt unless he apologised. The conviction and sentencing of journalists of Mid-Day for publishing information about the conduct of Mr. Sabharwal has brought to the fore the issue of judicial accountability. The Indian judiciary is one of the most powerful judiciaries of the world. The conduct of the judiciary has a direct impact upon the life of the ordinary people of the country. It is imperative in these circumstances that a state institution of such high powers must be transparent and accountable for its actions. The courts in India have however consistently avoided calls for accountability despite there being many instances of serious allegations of misconduct and misdemeanour. At one time Justice S. P. Bharucha, former Chief Justice of India, admitted that about 20 percent of the higher judiciary in India is corrupt. According to Justice Michael Saldahna of the Karnataka High Court it is 33 per cent. Despite there being such admissions, no enquiry has ever been initiated against any judge for past 15 years.Under the Constitution of India, the only way to remove a judge from the High Court or the Supreme Court is by way of impeachment. This constitutional provision has failed miserably. Its ineffectiveness was clearly demonstrated in the case of Justice V. Ramaswami. At the same time, despite verbal homilies, the courts and judges have been the most reluctant to evolve even a self-monitoring mechanism for accountability. Such a situation has caused enormous arrogance and abuse of power.This is reflected in the procedure adopted for appointment of judges in the higher judiciary as well. Even though the appointment is made by the President of India, the selection is made by the collegium of judges. The selection process is non-transparent and all attempts to make the process transparent have been resisted by the judiciary thus far. Demanding judicial accountability has almost certainly caused initiation of contempt proceedings, thereby, stifling of free discussion on the issues plaguing the judiciary in India. Unwarranted use of contempt of court proceedings in fact diminishes the public perception about the judiciary's openness and transparency, of which the case against the Mid-Day publishing house is the latest.There are judicial systems within Asia which are considered to be failed beyond the point of recovery. Of this, the most glaring example is the judiciary in Sri Lanka, which is now facing criticism on all counts including politicisation of the judiciary to meet the ends of a corrupt Chief Justice. The Chief Justice of Sri Lanka, an infamous figure in the country, is feared for abusing contempt of court proceedings against anyone who opposes his questionable actions. The Supreme Court of Sri Lanka has now stooped down to a stage where public perception about the impartiality of the court and its competency to decide matters on merits is at an all time low. As a result the general public views the courts in Sri Lanka as a failed state apparatus which in fact adds to the decades long ethnic conflict in that country. The term democracy implies the notion that the people are supreme. All state institutions, whether it be the judiciary, legislature or the executive are merely the servants of the people. The basic principle behind the contempt of court proceedings is that the use of this authority by the court must be only in circumstances where otherwise the functioning of the court is impossible or obstructed. In India under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the term 'contempt' is not defined. Therefore if any person makes adverse comments against the court or a judge, the power to punish for "scandalising the court…" is frequently invoked. This approach is considered obscure in most established jurisdictions. The contempt of court action must not be an attempt to protect the dignity of the court, but to promote the administration of justice. The dignity of the court is promoted by the court being humble enough to face criticism, whereas promotion of justice is to be carried out by removing all hindrances in the delivery of justice. By the unrestrained use of contempt of court actions the courts in India are in fact derogating from their duty to safeguard the Constitution of the country, which also guarantees freedom of speech and expression in Article 19 (1). The honour of the judge and the judiciary - a state institution through which a judge is supposed to serve the people - is promoted and protected by the openness of the judge and the judiciary to face any criticism. Intolerance to scrutiny and lack of openness equates the judge and the judiciary with a dictator. At this pace the Indian judiciary once known for its eloquence and its contribution to the advancement of free thought and expression will soon be reduced to an egotistical institution. Such a judiciary is definitely not what modern India aspires for. India as of today requires a transparent, accountable and sensitive judiciary. The imperatives for the judiciary in India are obvious. It has a duty to protect, promote and fulfil the Constitutional guarantees. The judiciary must be open and transparent with a clear conscience that it is not beyond criticism. For this, it must be accountable to the people, which it is bound to serve. The judiciary in India is the last hope of a fragmented society, which when fails to respect its responsibilities, will soon bring insurmountable peril to the country and its people.

The above stated public servants have failed to provide full information to us ie HRW as per RTI Act , thereby covering up the criminals. The requested informations were no state secrets , no defense secrets but the accountability of above stated public offices. The information was requested for public welfare , to secure equitable justice to public , to stop corrupt practices in public service , in exercise of my FUNDAMENTAL DUTY as a citizen of India. However the above stated public servants preferred to violate law themselves & to protect the criminals.

The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-free under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved.

just think , if a judge himself that too apex court of the land itself commits crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ?

it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to commit more crimes. that is exactly what is happening in india. the educated public must raise to the occasion & peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalization of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.

FAILURE OF INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM

SALUTES TO KARGIL MARTYRS , NSG COMMANDOS & MUMBAI POLICE

We express our deep condolences to the victims of 27/11/08 mumbaiterrorist attacks. We at e-voice salute our NSG Commondos & Mumbaipolice for teaching the external enemies a befitting lesson andprotecting our motherland from the external enemies. We pay our wholehearted respects to the martyrs , who laid down their lives , in thecourse of protecting our people & country from the clutches ofterrorists.At this juncture , we must also remember our kargil martyrs of Indianmilitary who sacrificed their lives protecting our motherland – INDIAfrom enemies.

Mumbai terrorists killed 200 people , where as a fake drugsmanufacturer kills thousands of people by selling fake drugs / fakemedicines. Drugs control department officials lets off many such suchfake drugs manufacturers , in turn killing thousands of innocents. Thenumber of end victims are huge than any terrorist attacks. This isjust one instance , in this way corrupt public servants of variousdepartments compromise with their official duties & murder scores ofinnocents.

The corrupt public servants network , is oiled far better than italy'smafia. Common man doesn't get justice , even if he complains to higherofficials , vigilance authorities or even court of law. As the bribebooty reaches higher-ups & political bosses.. thus black money iscreated.

Now , underworld / terrorist outfits are involved in huge real estatebusiness , film production / distribution , film piracy business ,etc , to reap more illegal profits out of illegal money. This shakesupside down our government's fiscal policies.

Corruption in india has taken root & ever growing , due to the failureof indian legal system. Right from the stage of complaint registrationby police to trial of case & final judgement , everything issusceptible to manipulation by rich criminals. The saving grace isstill a few honest judges , police are there , who are swimmingagainst the tide of corruption & doing their public duties honestly.In the following articles involving actual cases , one can see thefailures of various stages of legal system – registering FIR ,investigation of case , prosecution-defense nexus , final judgement ,etc .If a corrupt public servant is apprehended , it is equal to depriving100 terrorists out of funds , putting 100 criminals out of action.Will the common man raise to give a befitting lesson to corruptpublic servants.

At the outset , e - Voice salutes the few honest police personnel whoaresilently doing their duties inspite of pressures , harassment bypolitical bosses & corrupt superiors , inspite of frequenttransfers ,promotion holdups , etc. overcoming the lure of bribe ,those few aresilently doing their duties without any publicity or fanfare. wesalutethem & pay our respects to them and hereby appeal to those few honestto catch their corrupt colleagues.The police are trained , to crack open the cases of crimes by justholding onto a thread of clue. Based on that clue they investigatelike"Sherlock holmes" and apprehend the real criminals. nowadays , whenpolice are under various pressures , stresses - they are frequentlyusing 3rd degree torture methods on innocents. Mainly there are 3reasons for this :1) when the investigating officer (I.O) lacks the brains ofSherlockholmes , to cover-up his own inefficiency he uses 3rd degree tortureoninnocents.2) When the I.O is biased towards rich , powerful crooks , toframeinnocents & to extract false confessions from them , 3rd degreetortureis used on innocents.3) When the I.O is properly doing the investigations , but thehigher-ups need very quick results - under work stress I.O uses 3rddegree torture on innocents.Nowhere in statuette books , police are legally authorized to punishlet alone torture the detainees / arrested / accussed / suspects.Onlythe judiciary has the right to punish the guilty not the police. Eventhe judiciary doesn't have the right to punish the accussed /suspects , then how come police are using 3rd degree tortureunabetted.Even during encounters , police only have the legal right , authorityto immobilize the opponents so as to arrest them but not to killthem.There is a reasoning among some sections of society & police that useof 3RD DEGREE TORTURE by police is a detterent of crimes. It isfalse& biased. Take for instance there are numerous scams involving 100'sof crores of public money - like stock scam , fodder scam , etcinvolving rich businessmen , VVIP crooks. Why don't police use 3rddegree torture against such rich crooks and recover crores of publicmoney where as the police use 3rd degree torture against apick-pocketer to recover hundred rupees stolen ? double standards bypolice.In media we have seen numerous cases of corrupt police officials inleague with criminals. For the sake of bribe , such police officialsbury cases , destroy evidences , go slow , frame innocents , murderinnocents in the name of encounter , etc. why don't police use 3rddegree torture against their corrupt colleagues who are aidingcriminals , anti nationals ? double standards by police.All the bravery of police is shown before poor , innocents ,tribals ,dalits , before them police give the pose of heroes. Whereas , beforerich , VVIP crooks , they are zeroes. They are simply like scarecrowsbefore rich crooks.Torture in any form by anybody is inhuman & illegal. For the purposeofinvestigations police have scientific investigative tools likepolygraph, brain mapping , lie detector , etc. these scientific toolsmust be used against rich crooks & petty criminals without bias.Hereby we urge the GOI & all state governments :1) to book cases of murder against police personnel who use 3rddegreetorture on detainees and kill detainees in the name of encounterkillings.2) To dismiss such inhuman , cruel personnel from police serviceand toforfeit all monetary benefits due to them like gratuity , pension ,etc.3) To pay such forfeited amount together with matchinggovernmentcontribution as compensation to family of the victim's of 3rd degreetorture & encounter killings.4) To review , all cases where false confessions were extractedfrominnocents by 3rd degree torture.5) To make liable the executive magistrate of the area , inwhosejurisdiction torture is perpetrated by police on innocents.6) To make it incumbent on all judicial magistrates ,to provideatorture free climate to all parties , witnesses in cases before hiscourt.7) To make public the amount & source of ransom money paid toforestbrigand veerappan to secure the release of matinee idol mr. rajkumar.8) To make public justice A.J.Sadashiva's report on "torture oftribals , human rights violations by Karnataka police in M.M.HILLS ,KARNATAKA".9) To make it mandatory for police to use scientific tools ofinvestigations like brain mapping , polygraph , etc without biasagainst suspects rich or poor.10) To include human rights education in preliminary & refreshertraining of police personnel.11) To recruit persons on merit to police force who have aptitude&knack for investigations.12) To insulate police from interference from politicians &superiors.13) To make police force answerable to a neutral apex body insteadofpolitical bosses. Such body must be empowered to deal with allservicematters of police.14) The political bosses & the society must treat police in ahumanemanner and must know that they too have practical limitations. Thenona reciprocal basis , police will also treat others humanely.15) The police must be relieved fully from the sentry duties ofbiggies& must be put on detective , investigative works.

Nowadays , we are seeing reports of corruption by police & judges inthe media and are also seeing reports of raids by vigilanceauthorities seizing crores of wealth from such corrupt police. SomeJudges have also amassed crores of wealth. Who gives them money ? itis rich criminals , anti-nationals . By taking bribe & hiding thecrimes of criminals , the corrupt police & judges are themselvesbecoming active parties in the crimes , anti-national activities.Those shameless , corrupt police & judges are nothing but traitors &anti – nationals themselves. When an innocent is subjected to 3rddegree torture to extract truth with justification by investigatingagencies that all for the sake of national security , what degree oftorture these corrupt , anti-national police & judges qualify for ?what type of aeroplane or helicopter the corrupt police / judges mustride ? ofcourse , for protection of national security. Here alsopolice & judges have double standards , what a shame.

We at e – voice are for "Rule of Law" & abhor all type of violence.Truly these police & judges are not building a Ram Rajya of ourMahatma Gandhi's dream.

AN APPEAL TO THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT OF USA ,CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA & CHIEF JUSTICE OF PAKISTAN- By American Citizens

Our country was known as " Heaven On Earth" , "Land of Equality &Equal Oppurtunity" & the "Statue of Liberty" rightly symbolized thespirit of our country. Now USA is known as a "Terror State".

In the last 3 – 4 decades , the persons who occupied the office ofPresident USA ,in their individual capacity took wrong , inhumandecisions , meddled in the internal affairs of other sovereignnations , spent our resources to create terrorist outfits like al-queda , Taliban in those countries.

9 . what legal right our President of USA have , to illegally spendbillions of our dollars on inhuman , llegal acts of terrorism ,military coup , creation , aiding & abetting of terrorists , etc , inother sovereign nations ? while we are suffering from loss ofjobs ,loss of home due to natural calamities , etc ?

Crux , Foundation of all religions is humanity , kindness & universalbrotherhood. It is the preachers who misrepresent it. Terrorismcreated , aided , abetted by anybody is inhuman & wrong . Terrorism iscreation of power hungry , selfish people & they must be legallypunished .

Hereby , we appeal to the honourable court to legally prosecutePrevious PRESIDENTS OF USA in the last 4 decades , for crimes ofterror , as per the present US anti-terror laws.

Recently , in the issue of last week "The Week" , cabinet minister ofgovernment of srilanka (previously a deadly terrorist & right hand manof LTTE chief Prabhakaran ) Mr. Karuna , Himself has stated in aninterview that LTTE received arms training in Tamilnadu State ofIndia , to wage war against Government of Srilanka. The Justice JainCommission Of Enquiry , which probed late PM Rajiv Gandhi'sassassination case , also stated that Tamil Terrorist outfits inSrilanka Received monetary , financial , arms training support fromgovernment of India. GOI has even setup a radio station for tamilterrorists of srilanka , within Indian territory. GOI spent billionsof dollars of Indian taxpayer's money for aiding & abettingterrorism , while billions of Indians were half starving & goingwithout a single meal , without proper health care.

Recently in the last week , in a media interview the president ofGovernment of Pakistan Mr. Jardari himself has confessed that in theprevious years the government of Pakistan has aided & abettedTerrorism for tactical gains of Pakistan , spending billions ofdollars of Pakistani taxpayer's money. While ordinary ordinaryPakistanis were suffering from starvation , lack of health care , etc.

All the above proves that Previous Presidents of Government ofUSA , previous Presidents of Government of Pakistan & Previous PrimeMinisters of Government of India were the real master minds ofTERRORISM , founded , aided , abetted TERRORISM FOR THEIR OWN SELFISHGAINS. In turn murdering lakhs of innocent human beings.

CRIMINALS IN POLICE UNIFORM- An appeal to union home minister & Karnataka state home minister The ABC of police force in India is apathy ,brutality & corruption . in India, police are not impartiallyenforcinglaw instead are working as hand maidens of rich & mighty. Thecorruptpolice officers are collecting protection money from criminals ,collecting money to go slow on investigations , to file B- reports ,tofix innocents in fake cases , to murder innocents in lock-up /encounters . they are hand in league with land mafia , today C.M ofKarnataka himself issued a warning to police officials about this. Even in lock-ups , jails, the rich inmates bribeofficials get better food from outside , mobile phones , drugs ,drinks, cigareetes , etc. they get spacious cells & get best privatemedicalcare . where as the poor inmates are even denied food , health care ,living space as per the provisions of law. The corrupt jail officialsinstigate rowdy elements in the jails to assault poor inmates & totoetheir line. More corrupt the police more wealthier he is. Even CBIofficials are no different. The only beacon of hope is still therearefew honest people left in the police force. Hereby , e-voice urges you to make public thefollowinginformation in the interest of justice.1.how many CBI officials & Karnataka state police officials arefacing charges of corruption , 3rd degree torture , lock-up/encounterdeaths, rapes , fake cases , etc ?2.how you are monitoring the ever increasing wealth of corrupt policeofficials?3.how many officials from the ranks of constable to DGP have amassedillegal wealth?4.what action you have taken in these cases ? have you gotreinvestigated all the cases handled by tainted police?5.how many policemen have been awarded death penalty & hanged tilldeath , for cold blooded murders in the form of lock-up deaths /encounter deaths ?6.why DGP of Karnataka is not registering my complaint dt 10/12/2004 ,subsequent police complaints ?is it because rich & mighty are involved ?7.e - voice is ready to bring to book corrupt police officials subjecttoconditions, are you ready ?8.how many police personnel are charged with violations of people'shuman rights & fundamental rights ?9.how many STF police deployed to nab veerappan were themselvescharged with theft of forest wealth?10.how you are ensuring the safety , health , food , living space ofinmates in jails?11.how you are ensuring the medical care , health of prisoners inhospitals & mental asylums?12.How you are ensuring the safety , health , food , living space ofinmates in juvenile homes ? DOUBLE STANDARDS OF INDIAN JUDICIARY & POLICEIn india , Law is one & same for all , however in it's implementation& enforcement , the public servants are practicing double standards.Poor Innocents are harassed , tortured all in the name of law ,rules , technicalities .Whereas , Rich Criminals are manipulating the evidences , records &are going scot free. The Public Servants treat Rich CriminalsFavourably with kid gloves ofcourse for a price.Now , take for instance , public servants of the rank of supremecourtchief justice & President of india are hiding information relating tocrime , covering-up crimes , violating commoner's human rights ,fundamental rights , obstructing citizen from performing theirConstitutionally prescribed Fundamental Duties as Citizens ofIndia ,no action by police , they are not even registering the complaint.Whereas , if a commoner cover-ups a crime or evidence , he alsobecomes a criminal , if a commoner violates the fundamental / humanright of a rich person , if a commoner obstructs a public servantfromperforming his public duties , all those become crimes & he islegallybooked for each counts.Why not police registering complaint against the above stated publicservants for above crimes. IS IT NOT DOUBLE STANDARD.

In India , as per constitution of india all citizens areequal , have right to equal oppurtunity &equitable justice irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. theconstitution has guaranteed these to every indiancitizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , everyhumanbeing on earth has got HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue ofhis / her birth.However in india , CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES / PUBLICSERVANTS have forgotten this & are acting as lords ,autocrats - unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONALFUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS appointed to serve the public,public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers &paymasters of this very same public servants.In India , corruption has spread it's tentacles far &wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The lastresort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even therecorruption has spread.In present day India , if oneis rich , he can committ any type of crime & get away clean fromcourts of law. there are corrupt police officialswho modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes updifferent line of investigation , fix innocents ,coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture ,file B report closing the case , decides not toappeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see thelist of millionnaire police officials who arecaught by karnataka lokayukta.Next step , the prosecutor & defense advocate strikes adeal , manipulates evidences , manipulates wayof presentation of case & way of argument favouring the rich crooksfor a price , as observed in high profileBMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN & defense counsel RKANAND. In this way , if corrupt police & advocates ,together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge isleft high & dry eventhough the judge is honest,he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself iscorrupt , people's last hope , democracy is dead. nowadayswe are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary.our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTERESTLITIGATION before hon'ble supreme court of india,but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHATDOESPUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MEANS ?ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF PUBLICS.The issues raised by us for sample :1. sale of fake medicines & adulterated food products , beverages ,colas affecting the health of millions of indians& public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerousproducts from india .2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits ,tribals , backward castes by government authoritieswhereas regularising illegal land encroachments , illegal buildingsby high & mighty people in total disregard to law.in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defyingcourt orders & enacting special laws all to favour rich landgrabbers.3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws ,pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies.4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servantsleaking india's defense secrets to foreign countries& some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by antinationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM & underworld dons in gulfcountries & elsewhere.these type of appeals are for public good , nationalsecurity , as public are affected by them. still supreme court ofindia is not consideringour repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to considereven a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courtseven have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good ,inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints.over & above this at the time of my very first appeal my income wasvery low & i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligiblefor free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me.Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals the Honourable chiefjustice of India & H.E.Honourable President of Indiaare not giving the requested information . these action of CJI &PRESIDENT OF INDIA is aiding high & mighty criminals , antinationals ,amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which isacognizable offence.CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OFINDIA -http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI –http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE –http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIAhttp://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE –http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE –http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITEDhttp://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIAhttp://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196are you ready to catch tax thieves ?http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALShttp://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196reliance industry where is accountability ?http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196crimes at infosys campushttp://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214crimes by B.D.A against a poor womanhttp://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212crimes of land mafia in Indiahttp://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212currency thefts in RBI Presshttp://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80killer colas & killer medicines of Indiahttp://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies ,public servants , but it is an appeal to thehonest few in public service ,to bring to book their corruptcolleagues.The Honourable Chief Justice of India & H.E.HonourablePresident of Indiahave violated their oaths of office , failed in their constitutionalduties , suppressed material truths / informations & therebyrepeatedlyviolated my Constitutionally guaranteed FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & BASICHUMAN RIGHTS & Obstructing me from performing constitutionallyprescribed FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES AS A CITIZEN OF INDIA.Hereby , i dorequest you to legally prosecute the below mentioned public servantsviz1. H.E.Honourable President of India2. Honourable Chief Justice Of India3. Union Home Secretary , GOI4. Governor , Reserve Bank Of India5. Director-General & Inspector General Of Police , government ofkarnataka6. Commissioner , Bangalore Development Authority7. Commissioner , Mysore Urban Development Authority8. Commissioner , Mysore City Corporation9. Labour Commissioner , government of karnataka and10. all public servants belonging to tax dept , pollution controlboard , etc mentioned in the above cases with web links.on the above mentioned charges. the whole issue of this news paper &the related materials at the weblinks provided, forms part of thiscomplaint. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else wherefor the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a resultlike loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by thegovernment. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called methe complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station forquestioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once topolicestation for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . thistype of one sided questioning must not be done by police orinvestigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to myfamily members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents ,loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with abovementioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Evenifcriminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases againstme or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will beeffective.if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the governmentof india is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivorsof my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminalnexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army WelfareFund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrearsfrom the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty policeofficials , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries. thankingyou.Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.

Date : 04.07.09 your's sincerely,Place : Mysore nagaraj.m.r.

CAN JUDGEMENT BE MANIPULATED IN INDIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE ? - WHY NOTPRISON SENTENCE FOR GUILTY SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES ?

New Delhi, August 21 The Delhi High Court imposed a four-month ban onsenior advocate R K Anand and colleague I U Khan on Thursday forinterfering with judicial proceedings in the high-profile BMW hit-and-run case. A fine of Rs 2,000 was levied as well.On May 30, 2007, television channel NDTV caught both lawyers in a"sting" operation, conniving with key prosecution witness SunielKulkarni to get main accused Sanjeev Nanda off the hook.A High Court Bench comprising Justices Madan B Lokur and ManmohanSarin found the two guilty of criminal contempt."The entire material leaves a bitter taste in the mouth about thegoings-on in the BMW case. There is no manner of doubt whatsoever thatthere was complicity between Mr Khan and Mr Anand... There can beabsolutely no doubt that Mr Khan and Mr Anand were, somehow or theother, more than mixed up in the BMW case," observed the court, whichhad taken suo motu cognizance of the expose the day after it wasaired."Mr Anand and Mr Khan are prohibited from appearing in this court(Delhi High Court) or courts subordinate to it for four months fromtoday. However, they are free to discharge their professional dutiesin terms of consultation, advice, conferences, opinions, etc," saidthe Bench.The court desisted from commenting on the conduct of Kulkarni, sayingit would not be "proper" to do so.Though the verdict comes solely on basis of the CDs and transcripts ofthe sting operation, the Bench said, "the unshakeable truth is that MrAnand is guilty of criminal contempt of court".Contemplating a fit punishment, the Bench wondered how many in thelegal fraternity had had been taken by surprise to find Anandindulging in such "sharp practices". "Mr Anand has held manyprestigious elective positions in the legal fraternity, including theBar Council of Delhi. He has also been a Member of the Rajya Sabha,"noted the Bench.The court said it knew Khan for his legal acumen and forensic skills —"perhaps the reason why he was appointed Special Public Prosecutor inthe BMW case". High expectations over Khan fell apart when his conduct"betrayed the trust that prosecution reposed in him... what he did wasperhaps beyond the realm of contemplation of the prosecuting agency".Chastising the two for their misconduct, the Bench said: "We are notdealing with a young lawyer who, driven by ambition and desire...transgresses the limits or unwittingly or unknowingly commits criminalcontempt. We are dealing with senior advocates, who are expected toconduct themselves as gentlemen and role models for younger members ofthe Bar."The court forwarded a recommendation that the two be "stripped oftheir designations as senior advocates". The High Court RegistrarGeneral will put up the court's recommendation before Chief Justice APShah within a month.In response to the verdict, the Delhi Bar Association president,advocate Rajiv Khosla, said about 20,000 lawyers from district courtswere going on strike on August 22 in protest.R K AnandBegan legal career in Delhi's Tis Hazari Court as a civil lawyer in1967. Appointed government counsel in 1976. In 2000, JMM nominated himto Rajya Sabha from Jharkhand. Appointed AICC observer for Assemblypolls in Himachal Pradesh in February 2003.High-profile cases:* In 1980, represented the late Indira Gandhi in a property litigationfiled by Maneka Gandhi after Sanjay Gandhi's death* Narasimha Rao in the JMM bribery and the St Kitts case* Chandraswami in the FERA violation case* H K L Bhagat in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case* Former external affairs minister Natwar Singh's son Jagat Singh inthe murder/suicide of his wife Natasha SinghI U KhanOne of the top five criminal lawyers in Capital. He was charging a feeof only Re 1 in the BMW case. Began his career in late 1960s, and cameintio spotlight in 1980s.* Defended Sushil Sharma in the tandoor murder case, Subash Gupta inthe Personal Point triple murder, former Youth Congress PresidentRomesh Sharma in several cases and Tony Gill in Jessica Lall murdercaseWhen prosecution & defence lawyer together team up along with corruptpolice / public servants and manipulate evidences / records , thecourt is helpless and will acquit the accussed for lack of evidenceseventhough the presiding judge is of impeccable integrity , honesty ,he is help less. Add to this , if the presiding judge happens to becorrupt & teams up with the criminal nexus , the result isdevastating , the rich criminal will get away & the innocent willsuffer punishment in some cases even death sentence.

Who will bell these few corrupt among the judiciary , bar , police &public service ? why not prison sentence for two leading advocateson criminal charges of contempt of court , destruction of evidences ?are they above law ? why favouritism by court to the guilty inawarding punishment to guilty two advocates as they happen to bepolitical influential ? will the court let a common man so lenientlyfor the same charges ? In the past cases dealt by these corrupt duoadvocates , there are possibilities that the same tactics ofmanipulation of evidences , prosecution is done to win the cases , tofree the rich criminals , why not review of the cases dealt by thesecorrupt advocates ?

The honest few among judiciary , bar , police & public service mustuphold our constitution , rule of law & bring to book their corruptcolleagues.CASH FOR JUDGEMENT

Chandigarh, August 22: Punjab and Haryana High Court Judge NirmalYadav who has gone on leave after her name is said to have figured inthe statements of the main accused in the case involving the deliveryof cash at another High Court Judge's house, said today that she was a"victim of a vilification campaign."Speaking to The Indian Express at her Sector 24 residence here today,Justice Yadav said that "some influential persons were trying to shiftthe focus on her to save the real accused."Justice Yadav denied that former Haryana Additional Advocate GeneralSanjeev Bansal had talked to her on phone on August 13 when Bansal'sclerk "mistakenly" delivered a bag containing Rs 15 lakh to theresidence of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur, another sitting Judge of the HighCourt."Let any agency prove that I talked to Sanjeev Bansal on phone eitheron that day or any day in the past one month," Justice Yadav said. "Iam ready to face all consequences if this allegation is found true. Ihave had no dealings with Bansal. I have not received any money fromBansal or any of his associates. I am sure I will get justice."Justice Yadav said she had explained her position to High Court ChiefJustice T S Thakur and had "proceeded on leave." She said she wouldnot hear any case until her name is cleared.Sources close to her said that during her meeting with Justice Thakuryesterday evening, in which some other senior judges were alsopresent, Justice Yadav offered to proceed on leave to "maintain thehighest traditions of Indian judiciary." Justice Thakur told TheIndian Express that he had not asked Justice Yadav to proceed on leaveand that it was her own decision.It is learnt that in her meeting with Justice Thakur, Yadav vehementlydenied any role in the entire role.While acknowledging that she and some other members of her family hadbought a plot of 11.1 bighas of land (see accompanying story) atvillage Rihun Pargana near Kumharhatti in Solan district of HimachalPradesh on August 14, Yadav is learnt to have denied that the moneyfor purchasing the land came from Bansal or Ravinder Singh, the Delhibusinessman, who is also named in the case."Can't a judge buy legal property? Let the police or any otherinvestigating agency prove that the money for the deal was provided byBansal or Singh," she is learnt to have told the Chief Justice. Butshe is learnt to have acknowledged, in her meeting with the ChiefJustcie, that she knew Ravinder Singh. She is learnt to have said thatshe came to know him through some other judges.Meanwhile, highly placed sources in the High Court confirmed thatChief Justice Thakur is awaiting the return of Chief Justice of IndiaKG Balakrishnan from Brazil to apprise him of the developments in thecase. The Chief Justice is learnt to have asked the administrativecommittee, comprising senior judges, to monitor the case on a dailybasis.The Rs 15-lakh delivery: Story So Far•August 13: Parkash Ram, an assistant to Haryana's Additional AdvocateGeneral Sanjeev Bansal, delivers a parcel containing Rs 15 lakh at theresidence of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur of the Punjab and Haryana HighCourt. Justice Kaur calls the police.•Rajeev Gupta, Bansal's friend and a property dealer, tells the policethat the money reached there by mistake and it was meant for NirmalSingh, another property dealer. Chandigarh Police decline to hand overthe cash. Bansal is questioned•August 16: A case is registered against Bansal, Parkash Ram and Delhi-based hotelier Ravinder Singh who allegedly organised the money•Bansal resigns as Addl AG and surrenders on August 19•August 21: Rajeev Gupta, the property dealer who claimed the moneywas meant for Nirmal Singh, is arrested. The Inspector General ofPolice sends a report to the Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana HighCourt. The report says that the money was meant for another judge.•August 22: Justice Nirmal Yadav proceeds on leave

Caught in controversy is Solan plot that judge, 16 others purchasedCHANDIGARH, SOLAN, August 22: On August 14, according to revenuerecords, a plot measuring 11.1 bighas in Solan was purchased byJustice Nirmal Yadav and others for Rs 5, 52, 500. Details of thetransaction, obtained by The Indian Express, show that the land waspurchased by her and 16 others from six persons, all residents ofvillage Rihun Pargana, near Kumharhatti in the Solan district ofHimachal Pradesh. v="_x0000_i1025" v:shapes="_x0000_i1025">