Nitrogen Loss Scoresheet

Published: June 13, 2008

I’ve had a lot of questions coming in about nitrogen loss from corn fields that either went under water or just received excessive rainfall this spring. These questions are difficult to answer because the N loss process is complicated. However, producers need to be able to make decisions about applying additional N that are at least in the ballpark. And they need to be able to correctly prioritize which of their fields need the largest additional applications of N fertilizer.

Need for additional N is probably the same regardless of whether a field was replanted or not.

Ideally, producers would be able to conduct a diagnostic test to determine whether to apply additional N and how much. However, most producers who may be dealing with N loss are also so pressed for time that this may not be a realistic option. Wet conditions have delayed planting and other field operations and people are running as hard as they can to get back on top of things.

A lot is known about the effects of N fertilizer source and date, soil type, and degree of wetness on nitrogen loss. I have put my knowledge and opinions about these factors into a simple scoring tool. My goal is to give producers and service providers an easy-to-use way to identify those fields that are likely to respond to additional N, and to identify the fields that need the largest additional N applications.

I’ve put this scoring system together quickly and have not been bounced it off of many people yet. Consider this a first stab at creating a useful tool, but do not take the results as gospel. Use your own knowledge and opinions to modify what may be suggested by this scoring tool.

The scoring system consists of three factors: a fertilizer management factor, a soil factor, and a wetness factor.

The fertilizer management factor mainly aims at ranking how much of the fertilizer N is likely to be in either the nitrate form or the urea form. Both of these forms are vulnerable to loss by leaching or being carried away in flood waters. Nitrate can also be lost due to denitrification, which is temperature-sensitive and probably has been important in some fields since soil temperatures have been 65 or higher during some of the wet periods.

The soil factor recognizes that sandy soils are especially vulnerable to N loss by leaching, and that clayey soils are more prone to denitrification than are loamy soils.

To quickly assess potential N loss and response to additional N for a field, score each factor using the following three tables, then multiply the three numbers together to get a nitrogen loss score.

No matter what decision is made, the most important measure of whether enough nitrogen was applied is the response of the crop. Keeping an eye on the corn (or milo) as it develops will pay dividends. For fields with additional N applied, I would recommend having one double-applied strip in each field. Then if you can see the doubled strip, it probably means that the crop does not have enough N and more should be applied. Putting a small high-N area in fields where no N is applied now would also be good insurance. That way, if it was the wrong decision, it can be seen and corrected.

Fertilizer management factor

Nitrogen Source

Date applied

Score

Anhydrous ammonia

before November 1

5

Anhydrous ammonia

Nov. 1 - Dec. 31

4

Anhydrous ammonia

Jan. 1 - Feb. 28

3

Anhydrous ammonia

March 1 - 31

2

Anhydrous ammonia

April 1 - 30

1

Anhydrous ammonia

May 1 or later

0

Urea

<4 days before excess water

4

Urea

4-14 days before excess water

3

Urea

>14 days before excess water

5

Ammonia nitrate or UAN solution

before April 1

5

Ammonia nitrate or UAN solution

April 1 - 30

4

Ammonia nitrate or UAN solution

May 1 or later

3

This table has been modified slightly from the 2007 version to fit this year’s conditions.