The
New
SAVAK in Pakistan,
the latest spate of shia killings, should be examined in the context
given
below
and the senseless creation of “revolutionary times”
across the world will begin to make sense. Pakistan is a component of
it. That component is tickled through sectarianism as that is the
genius of our peoples. Other nations are tickled according to their
own respective genius minds. The
New SAVAK in Pakistan
works for these superman gods in no less a measure than the
old SAVAK worked for its own superman god. Is this stuff
rocket science you people? Why can't learned people in Pakistan see
it? Especially why can't the high falutin armchair analysts, and the
defense analysts, who have routine access to media see it? Look at my
examination systematically unlayering the
overarching context below.
Does that sound like American empire or Zionist empire to any of you?
Or does it appear exactly what it is -- an Oligarchic Empire for
World Government being constructed with “an end run around
national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece” (Hard
Road to World Order, CFR 1974
– read the superman's paper if you think I make things up with
my unconstrained hyperactive imagination)!

Com'on
you idle spectators and bullshit purveyors (those who deliver crap in
the opportunity they get in the media), all my good friends I am
sure. Six feet under the maggots can't tell the bloody difference.
Only the dead have seen the end of war, says Plato. Sure -- those
living see it everyday. And Most recently, in the systematic Muslim
killings in Pakistan where, in the immediate aftermath of targeting
the Hazara shias in Quetta with a bomb on
16 Feb. 2013, the shia eye surgeon, Dr. Ali Haider,
and his 11-year-old son Murtaza Haider
(photos above, more graphic images here),
were ruthlessly and prematurely dispatched to meet their Maker with
bullets to their head in Lahore this past Monday, 18 Feb. 2013. إِنَّا
لِلّهِ وَإِنَّـا
إِلَيْهِ رَاجِعونَ
.

You,
me, all of us, don't speak up right now, you, all of you my friends
in Pakistan, they are coming for you and me next (the question in the
photo above is not merely rhetorical; the assertion by the child is
also not rhetorical, but a dare, a show of courage and perseverance
that mirrors the Palestinian defiance living and dying under the
jackboots of a superman terrorist state). For, this is the
harvest of remaining silent when ZA Bhutto
was politically declaring the Qadianis
non-Muslims. Watch
this confessional speech in Urdu by the brilliant late Pakistani Shia
scholar, Allama Syed Irfan Haider Abidi, in which he openly
apportions due credit to the Shia scholars of the time, of 1974, for
participating in that political travesty in support of the Sunni
ullema led effort that ZA Bhutto was orchestrating from behind the
scenes to neutralize the American sponsored fanatic
religious opposition to him (see Profiles of Intelligence quoted in
Who
Killed Benazir Bhutto for America's role in funding
the PNA Alliance of the religious right to finally unseat ZA Bhutto).

Who
gives the right to man to challenge another's beliefs; let alone deny
a people their political, religious, civil, and basic human rights,
including to not be killed by either the pirate or the emperor for
their beliefs, inheritance, ethnicity, their land, whatever? See
Islam
and Knowledge vs. Socialization.

You
open that can of worms by the state giving legitimacy to calling one
group “kafir”, and now the Shias and Ismailis are the new
“kafirs” today. Following that,
who's next? YOU, my sunni friends, who are silently watching
the spectacle of shia deaths and demonization, just as both together
previously spectated the Qadiani pogroms in
silence; you and your parents, and your siblings still living in
Pakistan and unlucky enough to not have the Green
Card or Canadian citizenship. It is these cracks and
lacunas in our sectarian ethos which are perennially ripe for harvest
for the “revolutionary times”, we see being
enacted today in Pakistan. Unless we get rid of these sectarian
cracks that are repeatedly and deliberately enlarged into fault-lines
by empire builders who know how to both cultivate and harvest these
most efficiently for “imperial mobilization”, we are
burnt toast.

And
learned people who are supposed to have the wherewithal to lead the
charge, to educate the public mind to what's really going on, to
motivate them to stand up, have all been turned into glorified House
Niggers and useful idiots.

Never
too late to throw that yoke of servitude---even for house niggers and
silent bystanders---and for selfish reasons of self-preservation if
not for altruistic concern for anyone else.

So
what can we do? Two things to begin with:

1)
Perceptively comprehend the overarching motivation of the
super-terrorists in order to come up with
proper self-defence. See my article unlayering reality below.
Among all the patent lies the “vulgar propagandist”
(Chomsky's epithet, not mine) Bernard Lewis
spinned on Islam over the years, the one
thing he stated most accurately was: “Terrorism requires
only a few. Obviously the West must defend itself by whatever means
will be effective. But in devising means to fight the
[super]terrorist, it would surely be useful to understand the forces
that drive them.”Well,
obviously the victims of the super terrorists must
intelligently play at that table to also
defend themselves by whatever means will be effective. This
will lead all of us who are capable of understanding to comprehend
that all variants of Islam, “militant Islam”, “moderate
Islam”, and “revolutionary Islam”, are creations of
minds working assiduously on “imperial mobilization” over
a lifetime. None will therefore be fooled by them.

This
means shias won't be fooled by “revolutionary Islam”
despite their partisanship with the shia sect, and sunnis won't be
fooled by the other versions despite their partisanship to sunni
sects. These have nothing to do with the religion of Islam and its
1.6 to 2 billion ordinary believers --- but with methods of creating
“controlled chaos” by cognitive infiltration of the
religion, which means creating chaos that
is predictable, its tempo increasable and
decrease-able at will, and switch-off-able
when its purpose is harvested. At present, that tap control resides
in the West. It is entirely independent of the local population which
therefore cannot break through its strangulating grip in the normal
fashion. Just like the “Iron Wall” that surrounds
Palestine. That diabolical construct was accurately described by
VladimirJabotinsky:
“This colonization can, therefore, continue and develop only
under the protection of a force independent of the local population –
an iron wall which the native population cannot
break through.”

Something
similar to this “Iron Wall” protects these mal constructs
of “Islam” rapidly devouring our nation while
simultaneously lending the much needed pretext to the West for
sustaining its “imperial mobilization”.
Its strategic and full spectrum redressing takes more than just
ineffectively banning these terrorist organizations (which has been
tried halfheartedly in lip-service to the Hegelian
Dialectic) or ineffectively curtailing their antediluvian
“Islamization of Pakistan”
programs (which is talked about by the so called secular humanists
who are the second line of useful idiots of empire, the first being
our leaders, those who are not outright mercenaries that is). It is
discussed elsewhere.

2)
Bravely speak up, stand up, be part of the making your presence felt
in society by giving up the silence of the lamb, the ostrich, and the
coward.

In
that speaking up, and standing up, boycott the forthcoming Pakistani
elections.

Not
participating is a resounding NO vote to reject the entire corrupt
system. Do not participate in a fabricated system designed to ab
initio continue its servility to massa; all
waters run only Westward, even if wearing the turban, the beard,
clean-shaved, in uniform, in awami-libas,
in duppatta, in burqa
– and that includes Imran Khan, the favorite savior of the
young generation.

Imran
Khan is some part of the right-wing Difa-e-Pakistan
Council (Defence of Pakistan Council –
DPC) group of “militant Islam” formerly known by
different acronyms some officially banned: SSP1, LeT2,
LeJ3, JeM4, ASWJ5, JuD6,
TNSM7, etc., (I lost track), who are state-sponsored and
even openly supported by the Punjab government
(PML-N’s Chief Minister in Punjab Shahbaz Sharif et. al.) and
by right-wing elements of the ISI. And of course, Imran Khan also
occasionally flirts with the “moderate Islam” of
Tahir-ul-Qadri. Both Hegelian Dialectics of “Islam” are
sponsored by different factions from within the Pakistan military,
which in turn is paid from the Western tax-payers hard earned monies
to become the coveted Military Inc. of Pakistan with the Western
power's great blessings. This praetorian guard, a rising new “feudal
class” in Pakistan, is now fully invested in staying America's
proxy army in Pakistan. This is how power flows in Pakistan today
behind the veneers and puppetshows put up before the public –
be it the elected Parliament, or the many variants of “Islam”.
Without their minimally tacit approval, not a fly can buzz in
Pakistan. It would be found riddled with bullet holes the very next
day. The combined output of all these variants of “Islam”
and their open and secret benefactors, is to lay the groundwork for
the creation of “revolutionary Islam”, whether or not
they each realize it. That is the shia arc of crescent a long time in
the making and yet to be fully realized. We are, after all, looking
at a lifetime of World Was IV. Many teams have to play their part,
and it seems to me that “revolutionary Islam” has been
gestating in the oven too long. I am sure General HameedGul(Ret.)
understands this better than the brainless posterboy
of modernity, Imran Khan, his foolish rapidly aging protégé
who has been dying to become president at all cost. A good donkey to
ride on for the ubermensch.

But
then again, perhaps not, as it was this traitor General, then head of
the ISI, who gave to neighboring Muslim Afghanistan “their
Vietnam War” in service to his massa in Washington,
purveying the fiction of “strategic depth” to carry the
Pakistan army along. I once had a long conversation with a former
director of ISI the day after his daughter's wedding at which I was
an unofficial (hobbyist) photographer. When I presented the bride and
groom with a beautiful photo album of their wedding pictures that I
instantly had processed the same day, the father of the bride invited
me to join them for lunch, which I did. In the conversation he
disclosed that he was a former director of ISI, and when I explained
to him where he got his specious “strategic depth” from
to fck Pakistan, he simply couldn't believe nor refute the
commonsense of my straightforward observations. I held him to rapt
attention for the entire time and all he could murmur was: why did
it not occur to us? None of these Generals are known for their
commonsense. Groomed at Westpoint and Sandhurst, they reach their
positions of power in Pakistan's military only after being vetted by
the white man to be psychologically able to carry the white man's
burden on Pakistan's back without complaint. As I noted in 2008:

'In
2007, while the 'Army Act 2007' was still in effect, I offered two
Pakistani military men, recently retired 3-star generals, whom I had
occasion to partake a meal with in Islamabad, that I could craft any
terrorist to their specification for them for a mere $15000 – a
number that I conjured up out of thin air thinking it was suitably
low to impress upon them how easy it was to harvest the surviving
victims whose parents, wives, daughters, sons, had been bombed to
smithereens, who had nothing to look forward to in life except the
abyss of hunger, deprivation, and alienation, and especially from
among those holding the 'Pakhtoonwali' tradition. I was trying to
rationally talk them out of bombing our own peoples in the tribal
belt in this fictional 'war on terror' by explaining to them how
Machiavellian political science works. I had held their attention for
over 3-1/2 hours. And I was rather stunned when one of the 3-star
generals of Pakistan's Army, and let me hasten to add (Retired),
responded to my 'jihadi manufacturing challenge' with “Zahir
you are asking too much, I could do it for $2000”!'

Imran
Khan is the worst Trojan horse of them all – why? Because he is
presented as “Mr. clean” and unrecognizable by the masses
as being worse than “Mr. Ten Percent” from whom many
Pakistanis knew what to expect from the very beginning. As an
intelligence and Western asset, Imran Khan will deliver the worst
nightmare yet to simpleton Pakistanis. All his plans are outright
scams to feed more people from the gravy-train of state treasury. All
his plans are plans to loot and plunder anew – for the fresh
crop of plunderers – since he cannot harvest any of the old
already sponged off stuff. His energy plan or education plan for
instance? After HEC under AtaurRahman and SohailNaqvi squandered billions in crap, Imran
Khan is proposing to spend trillions, 2.5 trillion in fact, to
replace one crap with another crap. He wants to make English
compulsory and the medium of instruction after 8th grade
in Urdu medium and public schools to bring them at parity with
English medium schools; and teach everyone
in Pakistan the same standardized curriculum. What is that mother?
Even India which is ahead of us in all metrics education, does not
have such an insane policy. Yet they have IITs
which surpass the best IVYs in America in
terms of competition to get in. The son of Infosys president couldn't
get into IIT so he went to Cornell – as a safety school! We
don't have one decent university in Pakistan where I would love to
send my own children and this moron now wants to spend 2.5 trillion
rupees in another boondoggle? Increasing
literacy rate is great goal – it cannot be carried out in a
slave state with no economy to absorb them.
The development of a nation cannot happen overnight – only its
rape and theft in the name of doing speciously sounding great things
can happen overnight. Just like Ata Ur
Rahman did, and no one could challenge that mother for his
hare-brained schemes that turned Pakistan's higher education
universities into a diploma mill for third-rate and often plagiarized
work (see my report
sent to the Supreme Court of Pakistan—also ignored by them).

As
for Imran Khan's energy policy? You think anyone in Pakistan has the
balls to go against the WB-IMF tag team which has neo-liberalized,
i.e., privatized our economy? See what Thomas Friedman
says about it below: “The hidden hand of the market will
never work without a hidden fist -- McDonald's
cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas, the builder of the F-15.
And the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley's
technologies is called the United States Army, Air Force, Navy and
Marine Corps.”

Imran
Khan is just offering more scams and only fools and simpletons will
go for them---that is our Pakistani genius. Watch him and his
confrere, the flag-bearer of “moderate
Islam”, Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri, partake at the massa's table in the
2011 World Economic Forum. Invited there to ensure that the
brown-nosing horses run in the future electoral races will all be
compliant to the white man's burden! These two bit house
niggers, groomed into power in Pakistan the same way Benazir
Bhutto was, have the balls to stand up to the
massa? With what? The Pakistan
military works for the same massa, are paid from the same coffers, as
does the entire bureaucracy, the media,
public and private institutions, and what is now almost a fashion to
be considered avant-garde, to call oneself a think-tank, all of whom
continually echo the same core axioms of the massa, live off of its
largesse of aid, and occasionally playcontrolled
dissent.

Caption
Pakistani house niggers, Imran Khan and Tahir ul Qadri, seated
on the massa's table at the Western super financial elite's World
Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 27,
2011. (Photograph source: a reader submission) How did these two
political “no-ops” of least significance get invited to
world economic forum for the white man's recognition? They are
neither financiers, nor industrialists, and nor do they hold any
economic or financial ministerial position within the government of
Pakistan. Yes, as Western intelligence assets managed by their local
counterpart, both are being rewarded for selling the massa's pitch on
“moderate Islam” (even in their occasional controlled
dissent with the Pakistani establishment which is most dutifully
towing the massa's full line on “militant Islam”). And
Tahir ul Qadri specifically for his “600
page Fatwa on Terrorism”.
Both house niggers artfully
retain the core axioms of massa on “militant Islam”,
to continually push the envelope of the Hegelian Dialectic forward
as a self-fulfilling prophecy!

This is a
response to the unforensic
focus
on the Middle East War Agenda which permeates the alternate media
even today, well into the 10th year of the New Pearl Harbor,
orchestrated like the Nazi's Operation Canned Goods to
“goosestep the herrenvolk across international frontiers”
– first into Afghanistan, Iraq, gradually inching its way
throughout the arc of crisis, next target: the Crescent
of Crisis, Iran.
Time magazine had quoted Zbigniew Brzezinski self-servingly presaging
these very events in 1979 at the cusp of the Iranian Revolution: “An
arc of crisis stretches along the shores of the Indian Ocean, with
fragile social and political structures in a region of vital
importance to us threatened with fragmentation. The resulting
political chaos could well be filled by elements hostile to our
values and sympathetic to our adversaries.” (U.S.
National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew
Brzezinski, Time, Jan. 15, 1979)

It
was in the same year that President Jimmy Carter's National Security
Advisor, waging a clandestine proxy war upon the USSR, had started
giving covert aid to the CIA backed Afghan mercenaries (later renamed
“Mujahideens”) to foment sufficient agitation at the
flank of the USSR to provoke a Soviet Intervention in Afghanistan to
protect their own hegemonic interests: “According to the
official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during
1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24
Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely
otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed
the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet
regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president
in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to
induce a Soviet military intervention.” After the
Soviet Union had taken the bait and invaded, blood-thirsty murderer
playing chess in other peoples' blood, Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski
confessed in 1998 that he again wrote to Jimmy Carter back in
December 1979: “The day that the Soviets officially
crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the
opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost
10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the
government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and
finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.” (1998
interview to French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur)

Thus, the arc
of crisis which Brzezinski had glibly predicted in January 1979,
was firmly seeded by January
1980
as the Carter Doctrine, otherwise known as “God
is on your side”,
to set it all ablaze in the coming future. Sufficiently implanted
with the necessary explosive mix of religion, “jihad”,
hostage crisis, Iranian Revolution, Soviet intervention in
Afghanistan, drug trade, and sectarian fanaticism unleashed in
Pakistan by the hanging-judge-military dictator General Zia Ul Haq
installed there by the Carter White House in support of the CIA
cultivating and harvesting “Islamic Mujahideens” to fight
the USSR, it didn't take much ignition beyond the priming. The fire
quickly became self-sustaining as new recruits grew up in the lighted
cauldron and couldn't easily distinguish their head from their ass –
especially with the Pakistan military being in full collusion with
the CIA in screwing both Pakistan and Afghanistan society on the
Grand Chessboard. Today, these war criminals pat themselves on the
back for destroying the USSR with Muslim and Afghani blood costing
the complete destruction of what was previously a still stable
Afghani and Pakistani society – but they'll all hang someday
even if their carcass has to be dragged out from six feet under. In
1996, Zbigniew Brzezinski renamed the arc of crisis in his
next geostrategy book The Grand Chessboard, with an even more
imposing epithet, “the
global zone of percolating violence”,illustrating
with
maps galore the arc of crisis for those still uninitiated into
the vagaries of the exercise of American Primacy and Its
Geostrategic Initiatives of the sole unchallenged superpower.
(page 53)

That foretold
future – explicitly and very publicly presaged in 1979 in a
popular weekly magazine read by all and sundry not just in the United
States, but in the entire world – fully unleashed by the New
Pearl Harbor on September 11, 2001, had the former US Secretary
of State Condoleezza Rice self-righteously justify the purpose of
America's hegemonic cultivation of “the
global zone of percolating violence”
in 2006 in these sacred words: “What we’re seeing
here, in a sense, is…the birth pangs of a new Middle East and
whatever we do, we have to be certain that we’re pushing
forward to the new Middle East, not going back to the old one.”
(U.S. Secretary of State to George W. Bush, Condoleezza Rice, July
21, 2006)

All
the preceding is what the blood thirsty hectoring hegemons have
themselves narrated.

But
comparing their narration to empiricism tells a slightly different
story.

That
War Agenda today to “birth pangs of a new Middle East”
is still variously blamed upon:

the
Zionist agenda for Eretz Yisrael,

and/or
upon the sole superpower's Primacy and Its Geostrategic
Initiatives to preemptively acquire and extract the natural
resources in the Middle East and Central Asia before any other
nation or group of nations can rise to challenge its dominance.

The
former Zionist agenda is pitched as the ungodly wars waged by the
Jewish neoconservaties who dominate Washington, blueprinted in their
PNAC and other Wolfowitz drawn strategy documents for Securing the
Jews-only Realm.

The
latter superpower agenda is pitched as the wars of primacy for
America's sole preeminence, blueprinted in Zbigniew Brzezinski's The
Grand Chessboard and in Pentagon's many Joint Vision
strategy documents.

Both
premise, while appearing sensible in 2003 when I too employed them in
my maiden book Prisoners of the Cave, in the light of today's
empiricism outright lead to absurdities.

America
is going bankrupt due to these global wars with rising national debt
which now stands in the 13 trillion dollar range as officially
reported by the US Treasury, and its budget deficit this year, 2011,
is 1.4 trillion dollars. This means America has to borrow, i.e., have
its central bank the Federal Reserve print, 40 cents for every dollar
it spends, thus also commensurately increasing the national debt and
the burden upon the already suffering American tax payer.

What
sort of idiotic primacy agenda for preeminence is that?

The
United States hasn't been able to extract any of the natural
resources either from the Middle East and Central Asian soils anymore
than she was already extracting previously – as much as it
wanted – with its own coddled dictators firmly in power.

Why
did she need to wage murderous wars to decimate the region to remove
its own cultivated dictators?

It also sure
hasn't been good for the Anglo-American oil companies – they
can't do business when the region is torn asunder by the cycle of
insurgency
and counter-insurgency
manufactured by the Anglo-American Allies themselves. Same in
Afghanistan – no pipelines, only the so called quagmires, as
even the mainstream news of the United States puts it.

As
for Israel, if Eretz Yisrael is the principal reason for
decimating Iraq with millions of tons of Depleted Uranium munitions,
destroying its fertile top soils and bountiful water tables, not to
mention the ancient DNA of its inhabitants, and with only immense
hatred and ire of its millions of Arabs now irretrievably implanted
to greet the Zionist from Israel if they ever set foot onto its soil
for resettlement, then the Jews can't really occupy that land for
themselves now can they?

What
did the Israelis really gain by brutally removing the servile Iraqi
puppet of their own client state, the United States?

Only
chaos in the region!

What
Zionistan's founding father, David Ben Gurion, would have easily
called “revolutionary times”. Well,
according to that science of hegemonic conquest, these chaos-like
conditions in the Middle East have also only created more fertile
grounds to administer further mind-fcks to the natives because “what
is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”.

What
other benefit? Perhaps some smaller equally compliant but unstable
ethnic principalities carved out of the former equally compliant
monolithic and stable Iraq, which today lies in ruin.

But
wait, NO Eretz Yisrael!

Only
enormous hatred for Israel, and America.

What
an agenda for preeminence!

Only
the keystone cops could have blueprinted it.

Hmmm....

Reality
is almost like an onion.

Comes
in layers.

The
outer layer, when peeled, shows the next inner layer.

And
so on down to the core.

It
is difficult to get to the core of reality, without first unpeeling
it, layer by layer.

The
empirical fact however is that it is not mentioned in the mainstream,
and by many others in dissentstream either, because the conspiracy is
to not even acknowledge that the onion exists at all for social
engineering of ‘United we Stand’ and ‘introducing
beneficial cognitive diversity’ to mislead the public.

But
the outer layer of the onion is not the entire onion, however
persuasive and inviting it may appear!

These
are mere labels, the neocons, neoconservatives, neo-cons, they mean
nothing by themselves.

America
has been involved in warfare from Wounded Knee to Afghanistan, and
before WWII, there were no neo-cons by that name.

So
how does one explain America’s vast
military-industrial-academe-media complex which is what actually
wages the wars? How does one explain America's national security
state?

The
War on Terror, the war on Afghanistan, the war on Iraq, the war on
Pakistan, the war on Iran, on whatever mantras and asinine pretexts,
by themselves make no sense – as the war of neo-conservatism –
and it is easy to pin it upon the most visible harbingers for their
most obvious motives! The outer layer of the onion.

Thomas Friedman
best captured the interplay of these two sides of the imperial coin –
the thunderous wars of shock and awe, and the matching silent
wars of hunger and deprivations due to the loot and plunder of global
natural resources via the stranglehold of contrived third world debt
– in his 1999 New York Times column titled Manifesto
for a Fast World:
“The hidden hand of the market will never work without a
hidden fist -- McDonald's cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas,
the builder of the F-15. And the hidden fist that keeps the world
safe for Silicon Valley's technologies is called the United States
Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.”

But
peel down behind both types of wars, behind both philosophies of
primacy which are as old as hegemony, as old as mankind, and we get
World Government.

Global
Governance would not be possible without the transformative abilities
of these wars which seed controlled chaos, deprivations,
disenfranchisement, and fabricated public appeals to authorities to
resolve matters. Which of course they subsequently do, with greater
and greater centralization of powers into the private hands of the
same oligarchy who create the very crises for which they ex post
facto present their own preferred solutions. See: Response
to Financial Times Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government'.

David
Ben Gurion aptly described this Machiavellian modus operandi as “what
is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”.

The unlayering
is important to get to the heart of the matter, quickly, before it is
too late. And one of the reason it is not unlayered in time, is to
seed fait accompli. That is the master
political science.
To understand this political science which is time-critical and which
is what enables only narrating these matters ex post facto, see: “Of
Ostriches and Rebels on The Hard Road to World Order”.

That
too, by itself, is still not the inner most core of the onion, only
the next layer down, but it already demonstrates that focus on the
outer layer of the onion of reality, the visible reality, makes for a
great red herring.

No
one in Plato’s cave can ever figure out the reality behind the
images on the screen, by examining, and in no matter what
excruciating a scholarship, the images on the screen before them.

That
is why the outer layer of the onion, whether one sees the onion at
all or not, is often pointless garbage.

Whenever
I cook dinner at home, I always throw away the outer layer of the
onion, it tastes terrible :-)