Larry Agran is Stealing Another Election in Republican-Heavy Irvine

Documents obtained by the Weekly prove Larry Agran's liberal, Democrat political machine, the one that has ruled over Republican-heavy Irvine for 12 consecutive years, already secretly stole next month's election so it can keep power for at least two more years.

The documents–a series of emails spanning a recent two-month period–outline how a Republican Agran ally and corporate lobbyist lured a decoy Republican candidate into the mayoral race to siphon critical votes away from legitimate Republican contender Steve Choi, a move that assures Agran of winning the Nov. 6 election.

]

A Republican businesswoman, Katherine Daigle's
political claim to fame is that she won a slot on her neighborhood
association board. Earlier this year, she announced she would
seek a seat on the Irvine City Council. The odds of her grabbing public
office weren't great, but they also weren't impossible. She was one of
seven candidates vying for potentially three open council seats.

In early August, on the last day to officially declare candidacy, Daigle
abruptly switched to the Choi-Agran race, a contest she has no chance of
winning–or even grabbing second place. In addition to enjoying the
get-out-the-vote resources of their respective parties, both men are
political veterans who'll each spend significantly more than $200,000. Daigle's campaign, on the other hand, has received on average less than $16 per
day for a contribution grand total of just $825. The one undeniable
impact of her move to the mayor's race is to cripple Choi by
robbing him of thousands of votes he needs to win.

The tactic isn't new to Irvine. In 2004, Agran wanted Beth Krom, a
robotically loyal member of his machine, to capture the mayor's office
over Republican Mike Ward, a distinguished conservative activist. The
sly Democrat quietly employed Earle Zucht, an unknown
character without any prior political activity in Irvine, to run for the
city's top job as a Republican. He even ordered his Democrat allies to
pay for Zucht's campaign mail.

As a result, instead of comfortably winning the election, Ward lost to
Krom by 2,004 because Zucht's fake candidacy fooled nearly 5,000 voters.
His mission accomplished, Zucht quickly disappeared.

Daigle adamantly denies she's the 2012 version of Zucht. To
help bolster her alleged innocence, she has been telling people she
never met Agran before announcing her mayoral candidacy. It's probably a
true statement. But it's also misleading.

What Daigle has kept secret from the voters is that she switched races
after intense, secret meetings with Starpointe Venture's Patrick B.
Strader, a longtime Agran ally and campaign contributor who is a paid
Republican lobbyist for FivePoint Communities, the real-estate developer
seeking government entitlements to build a massive
residential/commercial project around the proposed $1.6 billion Orange
County Great Park, the most expensive public endeavor in the city's
history. In July, Agran and his allies, Krom and Sukhee Kang,
overruled city staff and Republican council member objections to
prematurely issue an environmental-impact report favorable to the real-estate firm. In the aftermath, Emile Haddad, the man running
FivePoint, has made no secret that he wants the Agran machine to remain
in power. “Katherine hadn't once thought about running for mayor until
she met Patrick,” a source who knows both individuals told me.

At 10:26 a.m. on July 24, Daigle sent an email to Strader, who Agran appointed to the powerful Irvine Community Land Trust in 2006. “Good morning, Patrick,” it read. “Thank you for your call.”

Thirty minutes later, Strader replied that he wanted to “chat with you
guys”–Daigle and Roger Lee, a veteran Washington, D.C.-based liberal
consultant who worked for the Clinton-Gore campaigns, as well as theDemocratic National Committee, pro-choice Emily's List, NAACP,AFL-CIO, Service Employees International Union and the United Auto
Workers.

At 10:08 p.m., Daigle told Strader in an email, “I enjoyed our discussion
this morning. I am looking forward to seeing you again.”

Three days later, on July 27, Daigle told him, “I appreciate you wanting
to get involved. I am looking forward to working with you.”

Strader replied, “It was my pleasure.”

On Aug. 7, he emailed her again. “I had a nice conversation [with a
consultant] and am waiting to see something in my email. In the
meantime, I have some checks. Do you have a campaign account open yet?
Can you send me the information? I will call to discuss something else
tomorrow as well.”

On Aug. 8, Daigle told a campaign staffer via email that Strader was
writing her statement of candidacy with the aid of Marc O'Hara, a
liberal strategist who insists that his “firm is as non-partisan as it gets,” but has worked with Michael Dukakis' 1988 Democratic
presidential campaign; the California Democratic Party; Montana Democratic Party, Colorado Democratic Party, Senator John Kerry
(D-Massachussetts); the United Domestic Workers union; and former California State
Assembly Speaker Willie Brown, a San Francisco Democrat.

O'Hara emailed his draft of the candidacy statement to Strader, who
replied, “Really good. What about referencing her work with the seniors
of Irvine?”

The Agran ally then asked O'Hara, “What ballot title are you going to use [for Daigle]?”

[
O'Hara answered, “Small Business Owner,” continuing, “which, as you
likely know, tests extremely well with California suburban voters.
Please let me know what you think of the particulars of the ballot
statement.”

Later on Aug. 8, O'Hara emailed Strader that he'd edited the statement.
He wrote, “I have completely reoriented my approach to Katherine's
ballot statement this evening based on new information that convinced me
of the error of my 'Great Park' one-issue messaging.”

On Aug. 9, Strader urged Daigle to seek endorsements “ASAP.”

On Aug. 10, Daigle filed for the mayor's race.

Four days later, Strader and Daigle discussed ways to win the support of
the Orange County Republican Party and the conservative, powerfulLincoln Club.

On Aug. 15, Daigle worried to Strader in an email that she might be
publicly tagged as a fake candidate for Agran. She asked him if he
was “retreating” from promised assistance.

“Absolutely not,” he replied. “Can we have a phone call today?”

On Aug. 20, Daigle advised Strader about the status of her campaign
printing costs, logo and brochure design. “I neglected to ask you for a
donation of $440 from you and your spouse,” she wrote. “I would really
appreciate your contribution. Please, one more favor, would you provide
five or six other names that I may meet over coffee or I can approach
for a similar donation? We could use it.”

But after she'd placed her name on the ballot, Daigle didn't enjoy quite
the same respect or attention from Strader. On Aug. 24, he shortchanged
her on a maximum contribution, giving her just $250 and not sending any
money from his spouse or other relatives. By comparison, he and his
family gave at least $1,500 to Agran's campaign on Sept. 24.

According to professional polling information reviewed by the Weekly,
Daigle's candidacy is pulling thousands of votes away from Choi and will
block him from winning.

Confident the public would never learn that his political machine
already secretly stole next month's election, a jovial, backslapping
Agran walked into the Irvine City Council chambers for a rigged Oct. 10
mayoral candidate's forum.

Adam Probolsky, a Republican pollster and campaign consultant, organized
the event. Until about a few years ago, Probolsky openly despised
Agran, but that has changed. Nowadays, Probolsky routinely uses his forum
as a part-time Orange County Register columnist at the paper's Irvine
World News to brazenly shill for Agran's machine and its tainted Great
Park machinations that have funneled tens of millions of public dollars
into the hands of Agran campaign consultants on questionable, no-bid
city contracts.

He is also, you should know, a close associate of Strader.

Probolsky's candidate forum was a ruse from the start because Choi, who
fired Probolsky as an aid several years ago and knows well that he's
now in Agran's camp, refused to participate because of the conflict of
interest. Nevertheless, Probolsky disingenuously continued to publicly
bill the event as a three-way candidate's forum. His sole purpose was to
assist Agran's jump from councilman to mayor by holding a major event
that could do what Daigle couldn't do on her own: raise her name
identification for voters.

Indeed, though there was never any chance Choi was going to play dupe in
the forum scheme, Probolsky placed the councilman's name on a placard
in front of an empty seat at the council chamber dais and told the
audience he was waiting for him to appear.

Once the forum began, Probolsky admitted he knew Choi wasn't going to show,
mocked him as a conspiracy-theory loon, and then gave Agran and Daigle 10
minutes each to speak uninterrupted. He then paused, announced without
warning that he wanted an audience question, squinted his eyes as though he
were searching the room for a questioner and quickly picked a lady
wearing a purple outfit who was sitting in a front row.

She was a plant.

“I have a question for the empty chair,” the woman said, reading from a
notecard prepared before the start of the debate when nobody supposedly
knew Choi wouldn't attend. “Mr. Choi, how can I trust you to represent
me and others when your absence indicts that you are probably not a
person who listens well to others, especially to those who disagree with
you. Thank you!”

Daigle smirked. Agran cocked his head back, smiled and nodded in agreement.

Probolsky made a joke at Choi's expense, refused to take any more
audience questions at the time and returned to a format that gave the
two candidates a whopping 10 minutes each to answer a softball question.
Not surprisingly, Agran appeared to be a wise elder statesman compared to
Daigle, who gave rambling, disjointed answers and acknowledged that she
enthusiastically supports Agran's alleged leadership on issues such as
education.

But Agran–one of the best jugular-piercing experts in modern California
politics–saved his best for Choi. After hailing Probolsky's
“objectivity” and calling him a “good moderator,” he pounced.

“Uh, you mentioned Adam, the fact that, uh, Council Member Choi wasn't
here,” said Agran, pretending once more for the audience that he's not a
sneaky bastard. “His loss, maybe. But it's the community's loss. I
believe in the old Woody Allen saying repeated on Sex and the City and in
other forums that 80 percent of life is showing up. And certainly, if
you're a candidate for public office, you should show up. . . . I want,
maybe, to begin tonight just asking everyone here to give a round of
applause for everyone who showed up, including yourselves.”

R. Scott Moxley’s award-winning investigative journalism has touched nerves for two decades. An angry congressman threatened to break Moxley’s knee caps. A dirty sheriff promised his critical reporting was irrelevant and then landed in prison. The U.S. House of Representatives debated his work. Federal prosecutors credited his stories for the arrest of a doctor who sold fake medicine to dying patients. Moxley has won Journalist of the Year honors at the Los Angeles Press Club; been named Distinguished Journalist of the Year by the LA Society of Professional Journalists; and hailed by two New York Times Magazine writers for his “herculean job” exposing Southern California law enforcement corruption.