Dances with indoctrinators: How the left rewrites history and brainwashes your kids

What would you think about a race that
had a history of doing the following to others without provocation and for the
enjoyment of it?

The race attacked the camps of innocent
people, killing or capturing men, women and children. Captured men were
tortured in gruesome ways, such as having parts of their bodies cut off while
alive and then being slowly roasted to death over open fires. Captured women
were gang raped in front of their children and then tortured to death. Before
dying, the women saw their babies clubbed or stabbed to death, or dragged
behind horses until their skin was torn off on rocks and thorns. If not
killed, their pre-pubescent sons and daughters were turned into slaves.

Certainly, this has to describe the
depravity of the white race, right? Certainly not. It describes what the
Comanches did to other Indian tribes long before the white man came on the
scene. With few exceptions, it was typical of Indian life on the North
American continent, especially on the plains and prairies running from
present-day Nebraska through central and west Texas. Life was brutal,
primitive, ignorant, and short.

A superb history of the Comanches and the
warfare between them and other tribes and white settlers is Empire of the Summer Moon, by S.C. Gwynne.

This is not the politically-correct
version of history that is taught in K-12 schools and universities or portrayed
in movies. In the PC version, Indians, er, Native Americans, are portrayed as
peace-loving, environmentally-sensitive, and living in a communitarian utopia.
Then, as the narrative goes, the evil white man and his imperialistic government
came along and stole their land, massacred them, broke treaties with them, and
destroyed their idyllic way of life by putting them on reservations. This
version was reinforced by such movies as Little
Big Man and Dances with Wolves.

Yes, the white man committed atrocities
against Indians. Yes, massacres such as Wounded Knee
happened. Yes, the trail of tears was a fact. Yes, generations of Americans
were taught a Euro- and white-centric version of history and watched westerns
in which the white man was good and the Indian was bad. Yes, this version of
history was so patriotic and nationalistic that it bordered on jingoism.
Movies directed by John Huston and starring John Wayne were some of the most
popular of this genre.

Today’s PC version of history is just as
silly, inaccurate, and unbalanced as the earlier version. While the earlier
version was based on an idealized view of the United States, the PC version is
based on the opposite--on anti-Americanism and anti-capitalism.

If unvarnished and unbiased history were
instead taught in schools and reinforced by Hollywood, the left’s edifice of
social justice, diversity, multiculturalism, affirmative action, and
redistribution would collapse, because the edifice is built on a foundation of
white guilt, stemming from the left’s canard that only whites have been
oppressors. That’s why factual history isn’t taught and reinforced.

But imagine if it were. Instead of
colleges across the land pandering to Native Americans and other imaginary
victim groups with diversity role plays, skits, and readings on
campus about oppression at the hands of whites, they might have role
plays, skits, and readings in which Native Americans barbecue other Native
Americans. Students might then realize the universality of human nature in
terms of both good and evil. They also might understand the inherent danger of
all forms of social organization in which the individual is subjugated to a
coercive collective, whether the collective be a clan, a tribe, a city-state, a
nation-state, a college administration, or an “ism,” such as nationalism,
socialism, fascism, liberalism, conservatism, or statism.

Even more threatening to the PC
establishment would be a widespread realization that if the tables had been turned--that
if white Europeans had been 2,000 years behind Indians in science, language,
military prowess, and social organization, instead of vice versa--the outcome
would have been the same, in the sense that the more advanced culture would
have prevailed over the less advanced one, as has happened throughout human
history. It was just an accident of history and geography that white culture
prevailed. Contrary to the beliefs of the racist left, the race of the
prevailing culture was incidental to the outcome, not the determining factor.

To this point, the Comanches were able to
conquer other tribes, not because of an inherent evil trait in their race, but
because they used the weapon of mass destruction at the time, the horse, which
they took from Spaniards. If they also had had cannons, sailing ships, wealth,
and sophisticated social and military organizations, we might be living in a
Comanche nation today and having a different kind of barbecue on holidays.

As it was, the Comanches used the horse to
force the Apaches out of western Texas and New Mexico and into the Chiricahua
Mountains of southeastern Arizona, where Geronimo
would later fight the white man. Mexicans were so fearful of the Comanches
that they encouraged Anglos to settle in Texas
and kill as many Comanches as they could. Thus the seeds of the Republic of Texas
were sown, which would later blossom into the War with Mexico. But
this history isn’t taught in American schools, especially those with large
Mexican student populations, because it runs counter to the PC claptrap that
Mexicans, er, Hispanics, have been victims of white oppression and were never
victimizers themselves or descendants of evil white Europeans.

To misquote Santayana, he who rewrites
history is a deceitful propagandist, and he who lets him get by with it is an
idiot who commits cultural suicide.

You have GOT to be kidding me with all this right/left pit everyone AGAINST EACHOTHER dog and pony show. I can't even get passed the words "Rush Limbaugh"... write a real article that does something other than confuse everyone into fighting each other over minutia. This boils down to the Zionist regime, the infiltrating moneychangers who have been feeding our kids garbage in the public schools while their kids go to the best private schools. Give me a break. You need to step back, do a little more homework. We all, who are not a part of the mafia-induced Zionist cult, need to be banning together. Not arguing amongst ourselves. The tea partiers, if they are genuine, should be joining with Freedoms Phoenix members and with the Republic members, PARTY SHOULD NOT MATTER. There isn't time. A friend of mine is being trained in California school system intensive FEMA protocols and sabotaged from her job for becoming an activist. This is ridiculous. Get a clue people.

Comment by Sharon Jarvis

Entered on: 9/8/2011 8:49:24 AM

I'm more interested in how the RIGHT WING is rewriting today's history. So far I've learned from Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter and conservative talk radio that oil spills and radiation are good for us, that media coverage of disasters is a liberal plot to make Obama look good, and that charity for the poor and disabled is a "failed experiment thoughout history." Oh, and let us not forget that the unemployed are lazy, that the uber-wealthy are job creators, global warming is a hoax (I guess all those melting glaciers were created by Industrial Light and Magic), and that the poor aren't paying their fair share.

So my reaction to your article is: "fuck you and the horse you rode in on."

Comment by David Jackson

Entered on: 9/8/2011 4:22:21 AM

Hello, Ghost.

Congrats, on an excellent article. Wish it wasn't so true!

If you get the time, check out some of the so-called "universities" in the U.S. and see if there is anyone actually teach or, at least, encouraging research and discussion of the "Real History of the United States".

I'd like to see some more info on the travesties of the "pil- GRIMS". Maybe something on their home invasion tactics, grave robbing, or cannibalism would be of some interest (value).