Anybody playing it (except for me) ? I really enjoy it! It's great (the maps, the movement, the specialist classes which come with unique abilities like an arena shooter or a MOBA) and I even think about purchasing a season pass :X If anybody is interested in playing with me just say it.

Nomad wrote:Seems like shit to me I'm rocking BF4 on my ps4 so that is taking most of my free time what's left of my free time But I'd love to try it out, though haven't bought a single CoD after MW2...

There is a specialist character in multiplayer called "Nomad" he can set nano-hive traps

Yeah i also haven been in a part of my life where i was judging call of duty and became like the usual Battlefield-Elitist (almost 800 hours on Battlefield 4) but now i am again interested in call of duty. Please just dont become this elitist

If you really want to play a new call of duty i dont think that you should try Advanced Warfare or Ghosts because they dont seem to be that good... (can only judge Ghosts as i havent played AW) But i can highly recommend Black Ops 3, as i think it's a pretty solid game.

Ghosts is fun to play with friends actually. I used to play it with 3-4 guys and we're usually ruling the lobby except when there are cheaters or die-hard campers, of which there are alot of in Ghosts.

Everything AFTER MW was shit, except for single player. That is why I am waiting like EXTRA SALE OFF to buy that shit for single player only. Do not want to waste time on multiplayer. First no dedicated servers, second, too many perks, you practically are depending on them, third, ninja perk together with that shitty perk with two pistols, makes you almost invincible. Then again, the same shit with people calling you hacker....moment they start to lose, they get off the server, which results in wasting too much time for finding another lobby...in that case I prefer Titanfall. 6 vs 6, almost always you get on the server with all players in, and there is no camping or shitty overpowering perks. Everything depends on your abilities. Sure there are hackers also there, but not nearly as in CoD series. From all CoDs, CoD 2 and CoD 4 are the biggest and greatest multiplayer shooters EVER! You can see that by the number of people playing it even after 8 years from publishing. Except for counter strike, which multiplayer shooter can say that for their players?

Jules wrote:Everything AFTER MW was shit, except for single player. That is why I am waiting like EXTRA SALE OFF to buy that shit for single player only. Do not want to waste time on multiplayer. First no dedicated servers, second, too many perks, you practically are depending on them, third, ninja perk together with that shitty perk with two pistols, makes you almost invincible. Then again, the same shit with people calling you hacker....moment they start to lose, they get off the server, which results in wasting too much time for finding another lobby...in that case I prefer Titanfall. 6 vs 6, almost always you get on the server with all players in, and there is no camping or shitty overpowering perks. Everything depends on your abilities. Sure there are hackers also there, but not nearly as in CoD series. From all CoDs, CoD 2 and CoD 4 are the biggest and greatest multiplayer shooters EVER! You can see that by the number of people playing it even after 8 years from publishing. Except for counter strike, which multiplayer shooter can say that for their players?

I think you cannot judge every COD game after MW1 like this because they differ a lot in the points you mentioned. (Almost) Every game has balancing issues in its history because you maybe cannot even imagine how hard it is to properly balance a game. Therefore i mostly dont understand people complaining about balancing. Ghosts has been rubbish to me. I didnt like the maps, i didnt like the scenario, i didnt like the microtransactions. I skipped AW last year. This year a friend of mine gifted me BO3 on steam and know what? Today i purchased the season pass. The maps, the movement, the scenario and its special flavor appealed to me. I really enjoy playing it because its simply great! They did a lot of things right which everyone was critisizing about the last games; this concerning single- as well as multiplayer. They confirmed dedicated servers and there is going to be mod-support in the future as well. The movement with thrusters e.t.c. has been adapted a lot and seems nothing like the failure they did in AW to me. Also are the maps actually build for the movement (wallrunning e.g.) and the specialist characters give the game a bit more depth. It plays very fluid and fits a casual playstyle as well as a hardcore playstyle. Not to mention that it looks absolutely stunning. Best buy of a game in years for me.

Crom wrote:They confirmed dedicated servers and there is going to be mod-support in the future as well.

This is a promise they send after they launch every game AFTER MW, and can you tell me if any CoD game after MW has dedicated servers?

I am not discussing game experience of all, I am comparing my game experience with CoD2 and MW on one side, and my game experience with all other newer CoD games that came after them, and to me, all other games were not nearly a close reflexion of these first CoD games...

Jules wrote:This is a promise they send after they launch every game AFTER MW, and can you tell me if any CoD game after MW has dedicated servers?

I am not discussing game experience of all, I am comparing my game experience with CoD2 and MW on one side, and my game experience with all other newer CoD games that came after them, and to me, all other games were not nearly a close reflexion of these first CoD games...

512

Would you consider that this has something to do with nostalgia maybe? Anyway I like it a lot