This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

Re: Alaska: Palin Daughter Seeks Child Support

The only failure here is your argument based on nothing. Please point out where it says Sarah Palin told her daughter not to show. Here is what you said...

"Therefore, it's not Sarah Palin's business and she needs to be told to shut her hole and stay the hell out of it. - Vader

"Whom do you think told Bristol Palin not to show up? He offered her the money and wanted to see his son. Bristol failed to show up." - Vader

Now do you have any evidence at all that Sarah Palin did something or not?

My post was based on what YOU posted:

Originally Posted by Blackdog
"Sarah Palinís oldest daughter, Bristol, is seeking child support from Levi Johnston, the father of her 1-year-old son. A court document says she is providing nearly all of the care for the baby, Tripp, and is seeking $1,750 a month. She says Mr. Johnston has paid only $4,400 in more than a year. His lawyer, Rex Butler, says that his client wanted to give money for the babyís care on several occasions, requesting that Ms. Palin bring Tripp with her, but that she was a no-show."

Now please explain what Sarah Palin, has to do with this or anything I said?

Flying of the handle before you have all the details is just so stupid.

Re: Alaska: Palin Daughter Seeks Child Support

What is the big story? He isn't paying what he should according to the law to support his own child--another dead beat dad.

Levi has pulled in "in excess of $105,000 in 2009 through various media interviews and modeling related activities." The $105,000 figure is significant, because under Alaska law a non-custodial parent must pay 20% of income up to $105,000 a year -- which comes to $1,750 a month.

Re: Alaska: Palin Daughter Seeks Child Support

Originally Posted by Vader

My post was based on what YOU posted:

Originally Posted by Blackdog
"Sarah Palin’s oldest daughter, Bristol, is seeking child support from Levi Johnston, the father of her 1-year-old son. A court document says she is providing nearly all of the care for the baby, Tripp, and is seeking $1,750 a month. She says Mr. Johnston has paid only $4,400 in more than a year. His lawyer, Rex Butler, says that his client wanted to give money for the baby’s care on several occasions, requesting that Ms. Palin bring Tripp with her, but that she was a no-show."

Now please explain what Sarah Palin, has to do with this or anything I said?

Flying of the handle before you have all the details is just so stupid.

YOUR POST IS THE SOURCE OF THAT INFORMATION.

Thanks for playing sir ... but you failed.

Ok I am going to explain this one more time. That is BRISTOL PALIN, NOT SARAH.

If it was Mrs. Sarah Palin, it would say that. It says Ms. Palin who is the unmarried Bristol, hence the Ms. and not Mrs. Now since Sarah Palin has no custodial rights, why would Levi Johnston, be going after Sarah Palin? Or asking her to visit?

Your argument makes no sense, and is moronic at best.

The only real failure here is me letting you suck me into your patented brand of insanity.

Last edited by Black Dog; 01-23-10 at 07:19 PM.

Originally Posted by Absentglare

You can successfully wipe your ass with toilet paper, that doesn't mean that you should.

Re: Alaska: Palin Daughter Seeks Child Support

Originally Posted by Vader

Wrong.

Child support is paid to the custodial parent by the NON custodial parent. If the non-custodial parent is not allowed to be in the lives of his chilren; the mother technically has full custody and is not legally entitled to support.

That is the law of the land in most states.

No, it's not.

Child support is for the benefit of the child. It has nothing to do with whether the custodial parent is behaving properly in the eyes of the noncustodial parent. If the custodial parent is not complying with a lawful custody order, the noncustodial parent can pursue that in a separate matter.

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.