I think you misunderstand what I am asking. I want to change what the page looks like. Right now when the associate page appears there's a pig title called Associate5 on it. This will mean absolutely nothing to my users and cause confusion. I need to be able to have the flexibility to modify the verbiage (not the functionality) of the page.

Obviously I could modify the underlying ascx file but then I would loose and have to re-edit the file each time you released an update.
Does that make sense?

The current way the standard FB authentication works is flawed in that there's no way to "match up" logins with dnn logins (last time I checked 6.2.1), all of which makes it easy for user bloat. Coincidently, that is what makes your module attractive because up to know you did allow for that manually step of letting the user choose.

As suggestion, perhaps you could first have the module try to match by email, and if none found, let the user pick as they do now,

We had a great little system that worked well. DNN corp cam along and created a botched crappy version of the same thing. After that, literally everyone wants to know why out module does not work out of the gate with the "Crap" DNN authentication methods.

So to avoid supporting (time is money) literally everyone that tests our module with the latest build of DNN, we are forced to integrate the sub standard DNN standard authentication method for out module.

Now we find out module works better for people who never really understood the beauty of or module and authentication methods in the first place, but worse for people like you who actually appreciated the work we did.

Only suggestion I have is the you run an earlier version of our module and use our authentication providers, uninstall the junk DNN ones.