This website is a forum for
political debate and the exchange of ideas. Unless indicated, the opinions
expressed in any article, commentary, argument or review is solely that of the
author and not necessarily that of the publisher.

The Abolition of Britain

Peter Hitchens. Quartet Books, London 2000. ISBN 0
7043 8140 0 £8.00

Peter Hitchens believes that the country is going to the dogs. It’s
certainly hard to fault much of his analysis of the state of present day
Britain. Most reviews of the first hardcover edition in the establishment press
were extremely hostile, and often cases personally abusive. Hitchens, however, believes that he is not the extremist. That label belongs properly to those who,
"think it sensible to abolish our national currency and hand over or
national wealth to a centralised supranational power over which we have no
democratic control. They believe that government can spend our money better than
we can. Many of them use to believe that the best way to deal with the Soviet
threat was to disarm ourselves and smile. They think that the best response to
terrorist blackmail is to lick the blackmailer’s toecaps and give him what he
wants. They release convicted criminals by the score. Long before their
sentences are over and appear to believe that the only people who should have
firearms are criminals and the IRA. They think it is right to bomb innocent
civilians so that we can feel comfortable about watching atrocity reports from
the Balkans on the nine o’clock news. They defend the mass slaughter of unborn
infants; they even think that are getting better."

He is devastating in his criticism of the authoritarian illiberalism of the
liberal-left. The liberal-left restrict citizens’ freedom in the name of
liberty. Ulsterfolk will identify with his argument against the sell-out to the
Provos which is the underlying basis of the ongoing ‘peace process’.

"Those Ulster people who rejected violence, yet wished to remain
British… were willing to accept a suspect compromise if only because the could
sense that rejection would result not in saving the status quo, but in more and
fiercer pressure to give in. They must also have guessed that failure to give
the expected ‘Yes’ answer to the referendum on the Belfast Agreement would
mean that it was put to them again and again until they did so. The agreement
itself, as few have noticed, contains provision for referendums on the future of
the Province every seven years [author’s emphasis] if necessary. It is not
stated, but clearly implied, that these referendums will go on until the come up
with the ‘right’ answer, i.e. incorporation in the Republic. And after that
there will be no more."

In some ways, Hitchens comes across as a crusty old reactionary, and laments
the loss of something that nobody will really miss, but often it is necessary
to react to things that are going wrong. Ulster and the nations of the British
Isles need a national reawakening. There’s not much here on how to put things
right but it an excellent account of how and why things have gone wrong. It
could have done with a good index too, but that’s a minor fault in an
otherwise excellent book.