Monday, April 11, 2016

A Senator Just Went on 60 Minutes Claiming the 9/11 Attackers Had “Support from Within the US”

Underneath the visitors’ center in the United States Capitol is a
secure room where the House Intelligence Committee stores highly
classified files. In that room is a file titled “Finding, Discussion and
Narrative Regarding Certain Sensitive National Security Matters.” It is
twenty-eight pages long and it contains apparently damning information
on the events leading up to the attacks on 9/11.

“Those twenty-eight pages tell a story that has been completely
removed from the 9/11 Report,” said Democratic Congressman Stephen Lynch
back in 2014.

However, the 28-pages have been conveniently avoided by those in the mainstream media — until now.

On Sunday night’s episode of 60 Minutes, former Florida
governor, Democratic U.S. Senator and onetime chairman of the Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence, Bob Graham will implicate the US ally
on national television.

On Saturday, CBS News released a trailer for the episode and an accompanying article.

“I think it’s implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom
didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States
before, many didn’t have a high school education, could have carried out
such a complicated task without some support from within the United
States,” says Graham in the clip.

Until now, anyone who questioned the highly suspect ‘official’
narrative on the 9/11 attacks has been labeled a conspiracy theorist or a
kook. But when current and former members of Congress, U.S. officials,
and the 9/11 Commissioners themselves call for the release of these
28-pages, which tells a different story of what happened that fateful
day, people will listen.

CBS reports, Graham
and his Joint Inquiry co-chair in the House, former Representative
Porter Goss (R-FL) — who went on to be director of the CIA — say the 28
pages were excised from their report by the Bush Administration in the
interest of national security. Graham wouldn’t discuss the classified
contents, but says the 28 pages outline a network of people he believes
supported hijackers in the U.S. He tells Steve Kroft he believes the
hijackers were “substantially” supported by Saudi Arabia. Asked if the
support was from government, rich people or charities, the former
senator replies, “all of the above.”

This information being aired on mainstream television is nothing
short of historical and is a bombshell to those seeking the truth. For
over a decade, the families of the victims have demanded the full story
on what happened and have only been met with ridicule and closed doors.

Even the 9/11 Commission was railroaded. Not only were the
commissioners given extremely limited funds to conduct their
investigation, but they were also met with dead ends in almost every
direction.
For starters, only $15 million was given to investigate 9/11.
Compare that to the over $60 million that was spent investigating
Clinton’s affairs with Monica and the travesty becomes greater. This was
the largest act of murder in recent US history, and more money was
spent investigating a philandering president!

I’m saying that’s deliberate. I am saying that the delay
in relating this information to the American public out of a hearing…
series of hearings, that several members of Congress knew eight or ten
months ago, including Bob Graham and others, that was deliberately slow
walked… the 9/11 Commission was deliberately slow walked, because the
Administration’s policy was, and its priority was, we’re gonna take
Saddam Hussein out.

In 2006, the Washington Post reported that several members of the 9/11 Commission suspected deception on the part of the Pentagon. As reported,

Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11
panel concluded that the Pentagon’s initial story of how it reacted to
the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to
mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the
fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.

Whether they took part in the attacks or not, the actions of Dick
Cheney and George W. Bush after the attacks were nothing short of
criminally suspicious as well.

Bush
and his then VP Cheney told the commission that they would not be
formally interviewed in relation to the attacks on September 11.

On April 27, 2004 the White House released a statement saying there
would be no recording or formal transcription of the interview. The duo
also demanded to be interviewed together, against the wishes of the
commissioners and government protocol.

Under a pact with the White House that allowed all its 10
members in the interview, the commission is permitted to take a note
taker, but not a recording device. The panel said it did not press for a
formal transcription of the session, letting the White House decide.

Whatever is in those 28-pages, the United States government does not
want you to know. As is the case most of the time when the government
keeps a secret, it’s because they have been doing something they
shouldn’t have. It is high time we, as American citizens, demand they
release this report.

Please share this article with your friends and family to let them
know that those who remain suspicious about the tragic events that
unfolded on September 11, 2001, are not crazy conspiracy theorists, but
rather good people who want real justice for those responsible.

Matt Agorist is the co-founder of TheFreeThoughtProject.com, where this article first appeared.
He is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former
intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience
gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the
American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for
over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the
world. Follow @MattAgorist