Welcome to the Piano World Piano ForumsOver 2 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

pianoloverus
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Registered: 05/29/01
Posts: 20371
Loc: New York City

I think I've read that Chopin didn't intend for his Etudes or Preludes to be played as an entire set and that this was rarely done in the 19th century. OTOH both sets of Etudes and the Preludes seem to be very carefully arranged and IMO work very well when played as a set.

So why did Chopin seemingly order these so carefully if in fact he didn't want them played as a set?

Mark_C
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 20324
Loc: New York

This might seem like one of those distinctions that isn't a distinction, but I'd put it a little differently. I don't think it's that he didn't intend them to be played as sets, but that he didn't intend them necessarily to be played as sets. I think he certainly didn't intend that they shouldn't be played as sets.

But be that as it may here's my main answer, at least for the Etudes and to some extent for the Preludes as well. Most people seem to assume that the Etudes are (of course) studies in playing the piano. I think Chopin viewed them at least equally, and I'd guess more so, as compositional studies -- demonstrations of composing great music involving and displaying specific challenges, sometimes technical but sometimes not exactly, but so emphatically musical and creative that playing and understanding the pieces well involves far more than the 'etud-ish' challenges.

If Chopin viewed them so, then I think it's close to axiomatic that he'd view the ordering of the pieces as part of the compositional challenge, and actually part of the inspiration and concept of each next piece. Or maybe it's clearer if we put it the second part as sort of a double-negative: if indeed he viewed the pieces as I'm saying, he obviously wouldn't have then ordered them randomly or haphazardly, because if a great and brilliant composer (or any other kind of creator or artist) is approaching the units of a set creatively and artistically, he's absolutely not going to forget about creativity and artistry in how he orders them.

It was, and is, quite common for composers to work on pieces out of order having sketched out a plan for the set, but it's true that the performance practice didn't really call for performances of complete sets of anything. It's worth remembering how much it has actually changed over the years. "Encore" originally comes from the French word "again" - and was a direction to the performers to play that movement again!

I never read that Chopin 'intended' his opp.10/25/28 to be executed in any specific way what so ever, so what is the fuss about? Nowadays it seems to be normal practice to play either 24 as a concertpiece, probably not in his time, but what's against playing the entire WTK, though Bach never might have 'intended' it to be played as such, but now we find it quite normal and we, 'moderns' are able to enjoy it may be more than his contemporaries?

If this is any help, as most of you know Chopin arranged his Preludes as a nod to Bach's Well Tempered Clavier. As for the etudes, just FYI, op 10 was published originally in two different books, six etudes to a book. which could be purchased separately. Don't know about op 25.

For learning technique, the Preludes are probably better etudes than the Etudes. How many of you have played through all of them?

I see what you're saying, but just because something is difficult doesn't mean it should be called an etude. Should his Ballades and Scherzi be called etudes too? Obviously if you want to get into semantics and point out that 'etude' literally means 'study' in french, you could argue that every piece of music in the world is an etude since you are studying it while you learn it.

pianoloverus
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Registered: 05/29/01
Posts: 20371
Loc: New York City

Originally Posted By: the nosy ape

Originally Posted By: dolce sfogato

... but what's against playing the entire WTK, though Bach never might have 'intended' it to be played as such ...

Was not the whole point of the WTK that all of the pieces could be played consecutively without having to retune the instrument?

I don't think so.

I'm under the impression that many of the more remote keys were simply not used at all until the newer tuning conventions allowed for that possibility. I don't think there was any intent on Bach's part for performing a huge chunk or all of these pieces at one concert. This is more the result of the fairly recent fashion to perform huge chunks of repertoire.

If this is any help, as most of you know Chopin arranged his Preludes as a nod to Bach's Well Tempered Clavier. As for the etudes, just FYI, op 10 was published originally in two different books, six etudes to a book. which could be purchased separately. Don't know about op 25.

The Op. 28 Preludes seem to have been published in two separate books, too.

For learning technique, the Preludes are probably better etudes than the Etudes. How many of you have played through all of them?

At university I learned all the Preludes at my teacher's behest. Not that I could actually play them.

Originally Posted By: mazurkajoe

I see what you're saying, but just because something is difficult doesn't mean it should be called an etude. Should his Ballades and Scherzi be called etudes too? Obviously if you want to get into semantics and point out that 'etude' literally means 'study' in french, you could argue that every piece of music in the world is an etude since you are studying it while you learn it.

I think BDB makes a valid point. The Preludes are more etude-like than, say, the collection of Brahms's short pieces. Many of them consist of a single pattern requiring or inculcating a certain dexterity. Some isolate and present a musical problem, such as playing nothing but unison broken chords and keeping it interesting, or playing the same repeated note throughout a piece without its becoming monotonous, so to speak.

Am reminded that I had played the lot with the exception of no. 24 Allegro appassionato which had never been completed, having always “bitten me on the bum”.

Am presently making amends ... but am breaking my left hand galloping up and down while the RH has a field day with the melody ... but my, oh my ... what about m14 where Chopin dazzles the peasants with an arpeggiated upward run of 28 notes in 2 seconds flat.

ps Most of us will have put a toe in the water with the 28/4Largo ... with all 25 measures squeezed onto a single page.

For learning technique, the Preludes are probably better etudes than the Etudes. How many of you have played through all of them?

I have, a few times. And although I wouldn't say that taken as a whole they are better etudes than the etudes, I think some of them are very good as etudes, and seem as if Chopin may have had some pronounced etude-like thoughts while composing them.

Other composers' preludes sometimes seem that way too - many of the preludes of Scriabin and Rachmaninoff can double as etudes quite nicely, for example.

ChopinAddict
6000 Post Club Member
Registered: 08/29/09
Posts: 6360
Loc: Land of the never-ending music

A piano tuner told me, and this was the explanation: "It is possible that the G# will be the first to get sluggish when humid as the flange is probably tighter than average." Not quite as strong as my assertion above, but it is still "possible".

If this is any help, as most of you know Chopin arranged his Preludes as a nod to Bach's Well Tempered Clavier. As for the etudes, just FYI, op 10 was published originally in two different books, six etudes to a book. which could be purchased separately. Don't know about op 25.

Only the English and German first editions published Op. 10 as two different books; the French first edition published it as one book.

If this is any help, as most of you know Chopin arranged his Preludes as a nod to Bach's Well Tempered Clavier. As for the etudes, just FYI, op 10 was published originally in two different books, six etudes to a book. which could be purchased separately. Don't know about op 25.

Only the English and German first editions published Op. 10 as two different books; the French first edition published it as one book.

A piano tuner told me, and this was the explanation: "It is possible that the G# will be the first to get sluggish when humid as the flange is probably tighter than average."....

Are you sure he/she was talking generally, rather than specifically about your piano? Like, maybe there was something about that particular flange (which would be my guess).

BTW I'm talking about this without having the slightest idea what a flange is....and I don't mean that you have to tell me.

It certainly sounds to me as though the tuner were referring to the particular piano in question, rather than to all pianos in general. I find it hard to grasp that all pianos suffer from this (unresolved) issue. Certainly I've never encountered it on any pianos I have ever played.