Population and Topography

Wayfarers and those attending the markets and fairs brought business to the
town but their presence increased the risk of plague, a danger perhaps made worse
by proximity to the busy town and port of Hull. Beverley experienced a severe
outbreak in 1604 and 1605. Visitors from infected places were excluded and a
regular watch was kept, but about 130 people died of the plague in the parish of
St. Martin alone. (fn. 1) Plague recurred during the summer and autumn of 1610: strict
orders were issued against the concealment of infected persons and booths were
erected in the Trinities for their isolation, but many hurried burials were recorded
at St. Mary's. Measures were taken to relieve the families of the sick poor, and
the East Riding magistrates helped the corporation with funds. (fn. 2) For 25 years
there were apparently no further alarms, but in 1637 an outbreak in Hull gave rise
to stringent precautions in Beverley: townspeople were forbidden to go to Hull
without the mayor's licence; goods and visitors from Hull were excluded; public
gatherings were banned; and no more than 10 persons were to attend childbearings
or christenings. Those measures were successful, for Beverley was not affected. (fn. 3)
Precautions, again apparently successful, were also required in 1645-6. (fn. 4) In the
early 1660s, however, plague raged in England and by June 1665 strict precautions
were again enforced in the town. They had some effect, and in August it was even
rumoured that the plague had been confined to the family first infected. Although
the number of recorded burials during the year makes that unlikely, the corporation
decided in October to relax several of the precautions. In the summer of 1666,
however, continued nervousness lay behind an order to exclude from the town
students returning from Cambridge. (fn. 5)

No further outbreaks of plague were recorded, but after 1650 mortality was
higher than it had been earlier in the century and the town, like Hull, may not
have escaped outbreaks of fever and typhus. Between 1651 and 1670, the years of
the greatest mortality, some 2,750 burials were recorded at St. Mary's and the minster. At St. Mary's burials exceeded baptisms in the second half of the century by
almost 600, and a similar excess is observable in the minster registers (see Table 4).
Those figures indicate a natural decrease in population, but it is not known to
what extent that was offset by migration. Assuming that the average household
comprised 4-5 people, the hearth-tax return for 1672 suggests a total population of between 2,480 and 3,100. (fn. 6) The Compton census of 1676 did not separate the
town from the liberties, and a calculation based on the number of adults suggests
a total population of only 2,250; (fn. 7) the numbers given in the census were evidently
underestimates. An average of the figures derived from the hearth-tax return
indicates a population of about 2,800, compared with a possible 5,000 or more in
the 16th century. (fn. 8)

Table 4: Baptism and burials in St. Martin's and St. Mary's Parishes, 1600-1700

St. Martin's

St. Mary's

Baptisms

Burials

Baptisms

Burials

1601-10

427

593

474

528

1611-20

471

387

481

438

1621-30

290

301

366

394

1631-40

375

346

498

476

1641-50

468

419

615

606

1651-60

408

669

564

767

1661-70

447

586

614

737

1671-80

401

551

596

732

1681-90

443

448

641

669

1691-1700

-

-

540

644

No figures are available for St. Martin's for 1695-1700.Source: H.R.O., PE 1/1; PE 129/1 (figures kindly supplied by Miss S. A.
Richardson).

The hearth-tax return of 1672 also illuminates the social structure of Beverley
and the wealth of the inhabitants (see Tables 5-6). In all 1,543 hearths were
enumerated in 620 households, giving a low average of 2.5 hearths to a household.
As many as 295 households, or 47.5 per cent of the total, had only one hearth and
must be described as poor; they included 187 households, or 30.2 per cent of the
total, which were exempt on the grounds of poverty. The 183 households with 2
or 3 hearths, about 29.5 per cent of the total, were those of the middling sort of
craftsmen and tradesmen. Above them, 142 households, or 22.9 per cent of the
total, with 4 hearths or more included members of the more prosperous traditional
occupations, professional men, and urban gentry. Only 50 households had between
6 and 9 hearths each, and only 6 had 10 hearths or more. (fn. 9)

Measured by the average number of hearths to a household the two poorest
districts were Flemingate ward and Keldgate and Minster ward, each with almost
47 per cent of households exempt from tax. At the other end of the scale Saturday
Market and Within North Bar wards appear as the wealthiest parts of Beverley,
with the highest average number of hearths to a household. Together with
Norwood, Hengate, and Walkergate ward and Wednesday Market, they also had
the largest number of households with 4 hearths or more; in Saturday Market and
Within North Bar about one third of the households were in that category. Some
of the larger establishments may, however, have been inns rather than private
households. The largest concentrations of households were to be found in the
wards of the two market places and in Keldgate and Minster ward.

The most substantial households identifiable in the return were in three wards:
in Wednesday Market were the houses of Christopher Chappelow, a past and
future mayor, Sir Francis Cobb, and Sir Robert Hildyard, Bt.; Sir Edward Barnard,
a future recorder, and John Dymoke, another future mayor, lived in Saturday
Market; and among the inhabitants of Within North Bar were James Moyser, a
lawyer, the Warton family, and Sir William Wise, the recorder. The Warton
household was assessed on 20 hearths, as befitted the wealthiest family in Beverley.
Michael Warton also owned two other houses in the town, a lodge in Beverley
Parks, and land elsewhere in the East Riding and in Lincolnshire, London, and
Middlesex. The Wartons were involved in large-scale farming, including the
rearing and fattening of cattle, and Michael Warton made large benefactions to
the town. (fn. 10)

Table 5: Hearth tax, 1672, ANALYSIS OF HOUSEHOLDS

Wards

Households paying

Households exempt

Total of households

% of total exempt

Beckside and Barleyholme

31

14

45

31.1

Flemingate

25

22

47

46.8

Keldgate and Minster

51

45

96

46.9

Newbegin and Lairgate

30

20

50

40.0

Norwood, Hengate, and Walkergate

46

20

66

30.3

Saturday Market

65

14

79

17.7

Toll Gavel

36

10

46

21.7

Wednesday Market

76

20

96

20.8

Within North Bar

46

13

59

22.0

Without North Bar

27

9

36

25.0

TOTAL

433

187

620

30.2

Source: P.R.O., E 179/205/504.

TABLE 6: HEARTH TAX, 1672, ANALYSIS OF HEARTHS

Wards

Hearths: paying

exempt

Households with: 1 hearth

2 or 3 hearth

4 or more hearth

Totals of: hearths

households

Average number of hearths to a household

Beckside and Barleyholme

89

14

21

18

6

103

45

2.3

Flemingate

80

22

26

13

8

102

47

2.2

Keldgate and Minster

113

45

67

19

10

162

96

1.7

Newbegin and Lairgate

111

20

26

11

13

131

50

2.6

Norwood, Hengate, and Walkergate

146

20

33

16

17

166

66

2.5

Saturday Market

221

14

22

30

27

235

79

3.0

Toll Gavel

103

10

19

18

9

113

46

2.5

Wednesday Market

235

20

40

32

24

255

96

2.7

Within North Bar

179

13

23

19

17

192

59

3.3

Without North Bar

79

9

18

7

11

88

36

2.5

TOTAL

1,356

187

295

183

42

1,543

620

2.5

Source: P.R.O., E 179/205/504; a few numbers, illegible in that return, have been supplied from E 179/205/525.

The poor were evidently to be found in all parts of Beverley, often as near
neighbours of the more affluent townsmen. Surviving evidence for the treatment
of the poor shows that the authorities mixed repression with relief. During the
earlier 17th century the corporation attempted to discourage incomers likely to
become chargeable, and ordered the constables to search regularly for strangers.
At the same time it continued to make small grants to poor travellers, to maintain
the maisons dieu and nominate the inmates, and to use certain of the corporation
revenues for a Christmas dole to the poor. Limited funds from individual donors
and the corporation were available to provide materials for setting the unemployed
poor to work, and there was more relief of that kind from 1631, when the mayor
and governors made themselves responsible for the administration of the book of
orders. (fn. 11) To meet the more unsettled conditions caused by civil war and pestilence
the corporation augmented the parochial rates from town funds, and paid, for
example, for the whipping of vagrants, for the purchase of fuel for the maisons
dieu, for grants to freemen accepting pauper apprentices, for pensions to lame
soldiers and soldiers' widows, for clothing the indigent, and for grants to individuals.
As J.P.s the governors held monthly meetings to supervise the overseers of the
poor. (fn. 12) After 1660 there were renewed attempts to discourage incomers, but shelter
and medical help were occasionally provided for the deserving poor, and the
Christmas dole was drawn from more sources, including Robert Metcalfe's charity.
During the 1670s between £40 and £50 was distributed annually, but by the later
1680s only about £30. (fn. 13) The corporation obtained additional funds for poor relief
in 1687, when £200 was raised by mortgaging St. Giles's crofts. (fn. 14)

Special relief was also provided in emergencies: collections were made for
sufferers from fires at Beckside in 1674 and in Burdat Midding Lane in 1681,
when the county J.P.s also contributed, and £5 was given to poor people after a
storm in 1684. (fn. 15) Public relief was complemented by the private charity of such
prosperous townspeople as John Dymoke, Margaret Ferrer, and Thwaites Fox.
Charities provided doles, training as apprentices, help for craftsmen, or, like those
of Thwaites Fox and Michael Warton, shelter. The Wartons also tried to encourage
habits of industry by supporting a school set up to teach bone-lace making and by
a bequest for a stocking manufactory. (fn. 16)

For a few poor boys educational charities provided free schooling and enabled
attendance at a university. Foremost among the benefactions was Robert Metcalfe's
bequest of 1653 which augmented the stipend of the grammar school master
and provided scholarships at Cambridge. (fn. 17) At the grammar school, where the
corporation appointed the master, the roll had reached about 50 by 1670. In 1674
Joseph Lambert began his notable mastership, during which the school prospered
and attracted sons of such county families as the Boyntons, the Constables, the
Gees, and the Hildyards, as well as the sons of clergy, yeomen, and townsmen.
The school's pupils took up the scholarships at Cambridge, benefited from
additional grants made by the corporation, and returned to hold church livings or
to teach in other schools. Besides the grammar school there was a petty school at
St. Mary's and a charity school was set up in the 1690s. (fn. 18)

How far literate habits were inculcated in the urban community by the schools
is not revealed, but there was a collection of books at the grammar school, books
could be bought at the Cross fair, and in the later 17th century there was a resident
bookseller in the town. (fn. 19) Otherwise cultural activities were absent, unless the music
provided by the town's waits be counted. For the townspeople at large there were
the pleasures of inns and alehouses, the excitement of bull-baiting, celebrations at
royal proclamations and similar occasions of national rejoicing, and the brute
appeal of a public whipping or pillorying. The inns included the George and the
Talbot in Highgate, the White Horse, and the Bell, perhaps the later Blue Bell in North Bar Within; (fn. 20) in 1686 it was reported that there were 182 guest beds in
Beverley and stabling for 460 horses. (fn. 21) Other amenities were slow in corning.
Nevertheless, encouraged by resident and neighbouring gentry, the corporation
allowed a man turf from Swine Moor in 1667 for a bowling green behind his house
in North Bar Within, perhaps the Bell inn, helped to raise funds to buy plate for
Kiplingcotes races the same year, and in 1690 authorized a racecourse on
Westwood. (fn. 22)

The importance of the beck and the roads leading to the town was generally
recognized by the corporation, although it tried unsuccessfully to evade responsibility for the upkeep of certain roads in the liberties. Repeated attempts were made
to cleanse the beck but its condition had worsened by the end of the century. (fn. 23) On
the beck were the boats in which burgesses carried their own goods and one or
two market boats, which were let by the corporation. (fn. 24) Communication between
Beverley and other parts of the country was facilitated by the appointment of a
postmaster, mentioned in 1682. Within the town the repair and cleansing of the
streets was a matter of regular concern to the corporation, and steps were taken,
as in earlier times, to prevent damage by iron-shod carts. (fn. 25) A more sustained effort
to repair the streets was evidently made in the 1640s and 1650s, perhaps a reflection
of wartime neglect. (fn. 26) As a measure against the spread of disease the corporation
tried to clear the streets of wandering pigs and 'jolly' bitches. (fn. 27) There were still
few precautions against fire. It was ordered in 1607 that fires were not to be kept
without chimneys. The corporation arranged for the provision of fire-fighting
equipment in 1666, spurred no doubt by the Great Fire of London, and in 1674
and 1681, after the fires at Beckside and in Burdat Midding Lane. In the 1690s
the constables were under orders to keep the public wells and pumps in repair as
a further precaution. (fn. 28)

A storm in 1676 caused much damage to St. Mary's and the minster; maintenance
of the fabric of both churches remained a constant drain on funds, and there were
signs of serious decay at the minster by the end of the century. (fn. 29) The two churches
apart, no fine public buildings graced the streets of Beverley. A new building for
the grammar school, with a dignified porch, was erected in the minster churchyard
in the first decade of the century, (fn. 30) but other public buildings, such as the guildhall,
the shambles, the maisons dieu, and the gaol, were simply kept in repair by the
corporation. There were still many timber-framed houses in the town, but during
the 17th century new houses were generally built of brick, though with few
embellishments. (fn. 31) By the later part of the century, however, the more affluent
townsmen were improving their houses with pantiled roofs, decorative brickwork,
and porches, and by building out below the jetties. (fn. 32) By the end of the century
topographical writers, who always remarked on the two impressive churches, were
agreed that Beverley was a fine well-built town, 'of late much improved in its
buildings', a comment made before the era of style and fashion had begun. (fn. 33)