UPDATE: Well, that didn’t last long. Earlier this morning before I posted this item the OIC press release noted that U.S. Consul General in Jeddah Anne Casper would be attending the OIC’s meeting:

The Session will be attended by Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the OIC Secretary General. It will be chaired by Ambassador Ahmad Taib , Director General of the Branch of the Saudi Foreign Ministry, Makkah Al-Mukarrammah region. It will also be attended by Sergey Kuznetsov, Consul General of the Russian Federation and Anne Casper, US Consul General in Jeddah.

But within the past few hours that mention has been scrubbed. The press release I linked to earlier now reads:

The Session will be attended by Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the OIC Secretary General and members of the Jeddah diplomatic community and other invited guests.

No more mention of Anne Casper attending today’s OIC session on banning “defamation of Islam.” Let the cover-up begin!

Here’s a screenshot of the earlier version noting Casper’s attendance at today’s meeting (click to enlarge):

ORIGINAL POST: After the disaster of trying to blame an obscure YouTube video for the attack on the CIA operation in Benghazi and Obama’s prophecy at the UN that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam,” Hillary Clinton’s State Department appears to be taking another run at the First Amendment free speech rights of American citizens.

A notice was posted yesterday on the website of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) about a symposium to be held today at the OIC headquarters in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, on “Defamation Acts Against Islam.” And one top U.S. State Department official will be in attendance:

The headquarters of the General Secretariat of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation will host a symposium on “Defamation Acts against Islam: conflict dimensions and perspectives of co-existence between Islam and the West” on Monday 19/11/2012.

The Session will be attended by Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the OIC Secretary General. It will be chaired by Ambassador Ahmad Taib , Director General of the Branch of the Saudi Foreign Ministry, Makkah Al-Mukarrammah region. It will also be attended by Sergey Kuznetsov, Consul General of the Russian Federation and Anne Casper, US Consul General in Jeddah.

The OIC has made no secret of its intentions to use the UN and international law to criminalize what they consider to be “defamation of Islam.” For example, OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu gave a speech last Friday on “An OIC Approach for Combating Discrimination and Intolerance against Muslims,” in which he gave a road map of how they plan to do it:

OIC’s position has all along been entrenched in international legal instruments and we need to build on this tradition. We must emphasize that there is no hierarchy of human rights whereby a single right can trump others. Freedom of opinion and expression is among the fundamental rights.It does not include a licence to hate mongering. Freedom of expression does not mean the right to vilify. Our position must also be rooted in history and culture. Having indicated our seriousness at building consensus, we must seek to be reciprocated in the same spirit. We need to seek multi-stakeholder support for an international discourse seeking an intercultural solution – A solution that acknowledges that denigration of symbols and personalities sacred in Islam must be viewed as a matter of identity. It inflicts the psyche of Muslim all over the world. It is in that context that we seek an end to the systematic pattern and increasing frequency of events that contribute towards stereotyping, stigmatization and alienation of Muslims. Such events constitute an affront to human dignity violating the whole range of human rights of victims.

Coinciding with that “brainstorming” session during the OIC’s annual meeting of foreign ministers, the OIC released its Fifth Annual Report on Islamophobia, which is primarily directed at acts of free speech committed in the United States.

Hillary Clinton’s complicity with the OIC towards these ends is no surprise either, since she met twice with the OIC last year as part of the “Istanbul Process,” including her vow to use “old fashioned techniques of peer-pressure and shaming” to target “Islamophobia.”

NOW, there are those who will view the above as alarmist, and worse. But no matter. This blogger has been in the trenches, tracking/tracing Islamic jihadists, well before it became ‘fashionable’ to do so.

So, feel free to snicker and to go back to sleep. But the fact remains, American freedoms are nearing the chopping block, courtesy of the RED/GREEN alliance. And nothing anyone does – to pooh-pooh it – will matter a whit.

The anti-Americans, at the U.S. helm, are deadly serious. They have western liberty in the cross hairs, but they cloak it via gobblygook, PC mandated ‘sensitivity’ etc.

The hate speech movement has been going on for longer than most believe. It may have started in the mid-60s, in response to urban riots, and put forth by establishment liberals. I wrote about the chronology here: http://clarespark.com/2011/05/26/who-is-a-racist-now/. See too the link to “White Enabling of Black Power” that is included in the blog. It is quite remarkable how many famous persons signed on to this policy.

“Freedom of opinion and expression is among the fundamental rights.It does not include a licence to hate mongering. Freedom of expression does not mean the right to vilify.”

How can anybody take these clowns seriously? Their leaders openly call for the extermination of the entire Jewish race, in fact death to all non-muslims in general, and they have the gall to make statements like this in front of the UN? It reminds me of the signs being carried by people in the various Muslim protests over the years that said “behead those who call Islam violent”. It’s the sort of thing one might expect to see in an obvious parody, yet it’s reality and they mean it. They can’t even understand the concept of a double standard. How can one seriously negotiate with such people?

The core of free speech in the US is the right of citizens to criticize government and criticize the people who wield the power of government. This includes criticism of contenders for power. When Sharia and Islam is merged into government then Sharia and Islam must be excluded from treatment as a religion for free speech purposes. The coupling of Islam with government must be addressed. Imams are contending for power just as much as any American politician. And beyond that they are seeking a total displacement of non-Sharia law, inserting themselves into totalitarian control.

When Islam and government are merged, as in OIC member governments, then the entire notion of “defamation of religion” is wholly inapposite. It might be like saying that one may not criticize the president because he is the president. The American free speech way to deal with an Imam is to call her an public figure, thus allowing elevated rights to criticize, not the reverse proposition of silence.

To think for a moment that we should embrace an asymmetrical sort of political competition in favor of Islam or “religion” is preposterous.

I am more inclined to look at something like the Honduran law that mandates that a sitting president that seeks to change the law to allow them to run for a second term must be immediately expelled from office. The corollary here would be to treat Clinton’s attack on free speech as grounds for immediate removal from government. Discussion alone is enough to expel.

The notion of treating ALL religions equally is a fatally incomplete analysis. The issue is the right of citizens to criticize government.

A brutal person cannot be vilified by publicly making known that he is such.One can only denigrate or defame a person when telling lies about someone who is well behaved, honest and responsible. Telling the truth about someone like Bernard Madoff and his massive fraud is not vilification. He is a deceitful thief who only cared about himself and trampled over everyone to achieve his ambitions.

The same applies to religions. A religion cannot be vilified by spelling out the truth about it. Take Christianity. At the heart of Christian teaching are two commandments: A wholehearted love of God and a compassionate love for the neighbor including even the enemy. The latter commandment does not mean ignoring their disinterest or even rejection of the fundamentals of Christianity but telling them the truth about Christianity and seeking to reason and convince them about their need for this faith.

Take Islam. What is at the heart of Islam? It is a mindless submission to Allah and unquestioning loyalty to the example of Muhammad. There is no command in this religion to love Allah, one’s neighbor and even one’s enemy. The enemy is to be subjugated or destroyed. At best Islam can only offer a type of slavery to those who will not submit and follow its tenets – at worst a brutal extermination.

Historically those who have sought to make converts to Christianity through the sword have by their actions contradicted the teachings of Jesus Christ and the commandment to love. Historically those who have sought to make converts to Islam through the sword have by their actions simply been following the example of Muhammad and the teachings of the Qur’an. Which of the two was a vile person, Muhammad or Jesus? Which of the two is the vile religion, Islam or Christianity? Read the Qur’an and New Testament and compare them carefully. The character of the God and Father of Jesus Christ is very different from the character of Allah. This is not the same Creator simply perceived from two sides. Which is the God who has made himself know down the centuries and which is simply a god created in the image of a violent man?

Clinton and Obama are either woefully ignorant of the differences or worse, they deliberately disregard or distort these differences to make Islam respectable and somehow a perfectly good alternative to Christianity. Read the Qur’an and Bible and see which in fact is the deceitful religion. If Islam is a vile religion begun by a vile man it takes courage to say this loudly and publicly. Saying this is not Islamophobia. It is not because of a fear of Islam but because of the fear of the consequences this has for those who follow this religion and take its tenets to their logical conclusion – which we see in the lives of the radical Islamists and their suicide bombers.

If the religious of the world would meet in a cataclysm and eliminate one another the remaining secular leftists would be perfectly satisfied to continue their lives from that point, free of all religions and thus of all moral restraint. All of the major leftist ideologies believe that religion is the “opiate of the people” and something to be scorned and rejected. This includes Communists, Marxists, Fascists, Anarchists, socialists, et al. Totalitarian systems are challenged by religious teachings which do not, in and of themselves, promote a totalitarian political system. Islam does exactly that and thus is less objectionable than most other religions which promote some degree of individual freedom

You need to realize that progressivism, communism and socialism is a religion. The followers believe in the superiority of the state over the individual and are dedicated to the destruction of individual freedom and rights.

Mohammed ordered his followers to spread the faith by the sword and that is what they did for hundreds of years. They were told to allow the people of the book (Jews and Christians) the choice of death or submission. All others were to be put to death. The Muslim terrorists and Islamists are the true followers of Mohammed.

When Obama said, “[T]he future must not belong to those who slander the ‘prophet’ of Islam,” actually he was correct. The future must not belong to those who slander Muhammad, it must belong to those who tell the truth about him.

Those who are eager to make the truth known about Islam and Muhammad are accused of slander and of Islamophobia. If you see your neighbor engaging in harmful beliefs and behavior, ignoring or trying to excuse this is the most unkind thing you could do. The neighbor needs to be confronted in a compassionate way. The same, however, applies to all Muslims who begin to take their religion seriously without recognizing the consequences. It is worth noting that where there has been a strong Judeo-Christian influence there have been many beneficial consequences for that society with a strong emphasis on individual freedom, responsibility and accountability.

I might have missed it, but was there a mention of treatment of Christians in Muzze nations??? Here is Lady MacBeth Clinton planning to run for pres in 2016 and she is signing on to the UN gun treaty, UN attempts to ban criticism of muzzes and Islam, and backs UN Agenda 21 programs —- shouldn’t she expect to lose a few votes for her UN support?

There’s also a plan to transfer authority over the Internet from ICANN to the UN’s Telecommunications Agency. An organization where the US is just one vote among 193 and its interests frequently overruled.

There is a greater darkness than the one we fight. It is the darkness of the soul that has lost its way. The war we fight is not against powers and principalities, it is against chaos and despair. Greater than the death of flesh is the death of hope, the death of dreams. Against this peril we can never surrender. The future is all around us, waiting in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future, or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain

This suppression is greatly enabled by the current widespread teaching in education that there are no factual Truths or Universals, only differing perspectives. With the perspectives originating in the assigned oppressed group or the Validated Groups whose perspectives are thereby illegitimate.

The UN is pushing all over the world for the Age of the Individual to be over. That that is just a Eurocentric view.

“There is no right to vilify” is consistent with saying you may not criticize those in charge. Which is being pushed for the same reason education globally is now pushing to eliminate the Axemaker Mind. No one capable of noticing and defying the herd. Everyone motivated by minds grounded in emotion and Group Values.

There is a unity in all the UN does–the Death of Individuality as a Legitimate Concept entitled to any Deference.

If everyone in the West — every non-Muslim, at least — would agree to denigrate Islamic symbols and vilify Muslim personalities at every opportunity, eventually the BLEEP!ing idiots would stop being so BLEEP!ing sensitive. Or they’d touch off a Fourth World War and wind up dead. Either outcome works for me.

So our flakes are taking their flakes seriously? Maybe it’s the usual smoke and mirrors BS from this truth averse administration. On the positive side it could be about helping ease the Bamster’s mind about the biggest human rights tragedy of our time: telling the truth about Islam.

So….. What I want to see is a truly avant-garde artiste have the cojones to claim his free speech rights by creating, displaying and publically taking credit for “Piss Mohammed”. We already know that such a “work of art” is more than acceptable when the target is Christ.

It just happened here in PA at Edinboro University so it must be happening elsewhere. It wasn’t a “brave” American liberal student, however, it was a female Iranian student. She had two performance pieces prepared, one concerning abortion and one concerning Islam (in a negative light). The event was advertised. She then received a letter from the head of the art dept. telling her she could not perform her anti-Islam piece.

At the date and time of the scheduled appearance, she showed up at the Bruce Gallery where she was denied entry. She then stood outside the gallery in a Burka, holding a poster-sized copy of the letter of fascist repression she had received from the department head. Many students gathered to support her and then she led a procession out of the building, across and off the campus, and over to someone’s private front lawn. Students arranged cars to shine their headlights on the lawn where she then proceeded to perform her art.

I’m meeting with the artist next week. Her mentor had told her to document her performance for a Master’s program application so I’m fairly certain she must have had someone record it. I think sending it to PJM or Breitbart is a great idea. Thank you for the suggestion.

For far too many on the Left, Christianity and the historical self-confident West are the Devils incarnate that must be stopped in order to achieve the world they wish. That is driving their support. If successful, they will live to regret it. A multi-culti society ran by Ivy League Progressives is not a stable end-state for Islamism. It’s just a stop on the road.

William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!
Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
William Roper: Yes, I’d cut down every law in England to do that!
Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned ’round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man’s laws, not God’s! And if you cut them down, and you’re just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake!

Our constitutional right to free speech is not likely to be overturned. And even if it is, who is going to enforce it? Local cops? Very funny. Most of the nation’s police are hired in small communities where they live. Does anyone believe that small community tax payers are going to put up with cops who take their neighbors to jail for saying something bad about Islam? Would anyone expect the federal government to hunt down and arrest citizens for bad mouthing such a rotten religion, or any religion for that matter? The larger problem for legislating and enforcing such laws is that it would require a vast overhaul of existing law, and, most difficult of all, public acquiescence by a national culture that has been nurtured for hundreds of years by free thought and expression.

Remember that “the law is what the Supreme Court says it is,” at least since the days of the New Deal but especially since the Warren Court transformed our society by revolutionizing the federal system. After four more years, we will have an Obama Court. If it declares that diktats from the UN override our Constitution, and the president then in office calls up the armed forces to enforce the Court’s ruling (as Eisenhower did in Little Rock), then there is not much ordinary citizens can do short of starting civil war. Our right to free speech won’t mean much if the Supreme Court declares that there is no longer any such right because of the superior force of UN regulations. Be afraid, Americans, be very afraid.

Your naivety must be communicating youthful ignorance. Having lived under a communist-ruled dictatorship I can tell you that a tyrannically-ruled government would arrest, and murder, people for speaking or acting freely, if such action or speech were consideration a violation. Try using any of the commonly accepted racial slurs today, and see what kind of negative response you receive. Under progressive rule, freedoms are regularly being taken away from U.S. citizens in order to enhance their control over us. Pay attention and get enlightened. Freedom is not free.

Oh yes. I am sure they feel the same about slandering Christians. Or how about Tibetan Buddhists. I am sure they feel the same about the religious freedom of those in authoritarian countries where only approved “religions” are allowed.

And they will probably tell you that it’s websites like this one that spread racial hatred and anti-immigrant propaganda. In the OIC own words:

One of the principal
reasons fomenting the tide of racism is the growing increase in the right wing extremist political
discourse, including in some of the most liberal and pluralistic societies. This trend has led to the
deepening of the racist tendencies in those societies through propaganda against immigrants and
promotion of cultural and religious superiority doctrines. Immunity granted to such acts has led
to denial of basic human rights to the affected communities including their right to freely
practice and preserve their religious and cultural identities. Effective legislation is needed at the
national, regional and international levels to curb these tendencies as well as to ensure relief to
the victims.

“This trend has led to the deepening of the racist tendencies in those societies through propaganda against immigrants and promotion of cultural and religious superiority doctrines.”

Racist ? Arabs are Caucasian. (Hispanics are too, for the record)

Arabs & Jews belong to the same “race”. DNA similarities are profound.

What shall we do ? Keep killing. Check.

This OIC language is completely stupid, but the Islamist crowd seems to be taking over at the UN, seeing it as a fantastic venue to continue sabotaging the miserable house of the unbeliever from within.

“One of the principal reasons fomenting the tide of racism is the growing increase in the LEFT wing extremist political discourse, including in some of the most liberal and pluralistic societies. This trend has led to the
deepening of the racist tendencies in those societies through propaganda against THEIR OWN CITIZENS and promotion of (IDENTITY) cultural and religious superiority doctrines. Immunity granted to such acts has led to denial of basic human rights to the affected DISFAVORED CITIZENS including their right to freely practice and preserve their religious and cultural identities. Effective legislation is needed at the national, regional and international levels to curb these tendencies as well as to ensure relief to (US, THE PEOPLE,) the victims.”

There, fixed it for the OIC and UN dictator punks! Were they to repeat the above they would be, for once and maybe the first time, telling the truth.

Personally, I consider my “phobias” to be part of my human nature, thus an unalienable aspect of my human rights. That includes, for daily manifest good reasons, my Islamophobia and meanwhile also my Hillarophobia. Does this dumpy old Wellesley chick really believe she represents the United States of America? I beg to differ!

…systematic pattern and increasing frequency of events that contribute towards stereotyping, stigmatization and alienation of Muslims. Such events constitute an affront to human dignity violating the whole range of human rights of victims.

They stop blowing people up in restaurants, buses, trains, buildings, marketplaces all over the planet, stop shooting Afghani schoolgirls who want to be educated, stop killing all manner of human beings they call “infidels”, and I’ll stop criticizing their precious “religion”.

Deal ?

“Islamophobia”

Nothing “phobia” about it. Just contempt for assassins. Islamo-contempt.

Heretofore, say 2007, this so called constitutional scholar babbled about how, regrettably, the US Constitution primarily limited federal power instead of lining out all the wonderful things the federal government could do on behalf of the citizen.

A citizen like Obama’s ideal “Julia” who is monitored and assisted by a benevolent Barack at every step of her life.

The impetus of UN involvement in so many areas (control over the internet is mentioned here) is to make itself into a world governing body, to get individual nations (most specifically the United States) under its purview and control at every step.

To eradicate “nationalism” and replace it with what Andrew McCarthy calls “transnationalism”.

We’ll have to agree to disagree. I saw nothing ‘weasel’ in Obama’s comment that ‘the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam’. There wasn’t a call to respect all faiths. There wasn’t a call for Muslims to give what they are asking from others: respect for their beliefs.
There is no stealth in this president’s agenda. One thing you cannot call him is Clintonian.

Agree! — Until these miserable “new-age” punks succeed in dismantling our Bill of Rights they haven’t even a fig-leaf sized legal leg to stand on. They know it! A direct assault via the SC, even a much more liberal SC, is also not likely to be sufficiently swift and effective. (Although, last summer’s Obamacare ruling may have seemed like a success, surprising even them.) They know that, too! So, their only approach CAN be via the back door of the foreign treaty ratification process. That’s why this is being “trial-ballooned”, repeatedly and vigorously pushed, to see how far it may be advanced! — Your caveat, to THINK AGAIN, is apposite.

Tanstaafl, that was me. How many people are aware that the IPAB section of Obamacare can only be repealed between January and February 2017 – by a supermajority in both houses? They aren’t under the control of the executive or legislative branch. How many know that the CFPB has been written the same way? Their funding comes directly from the Federal Reserve so they too are unaccountable to any branch, and by extension, we the people. Throw in Fast and Furious and now this – the people have elected a tyrant.

Western ruling elites HATE God and LOVE Islam’s cruel god. European and UK ruling elites massively colonized Europe and Britain with many millions of Muslims in order for Muslims to OBEY Quran commands to wage jihad against intensely hated non-Muslims and conquer Europe and Britain.

Abu Baseer in London: “One of the goals of immigration is the revival of
the duty of jihad and enforcement of power over the infidels. Immigration and jihad go together.

Western ruling elites have great GUILT in aiding and abetting jihad against innocents. Future generations will condemn them. God will judge them.

What does the OIC have to say about this piece of human garbage, Abu Qatada, a guy linked to September 11 (the first one), a guy Britain recently sprang from jail whose “fiery sermons” of the past included recommendations to slaughter apostates ?

He was convicted in Jordan in 1999, similar to the guy who was so good at slaughtering Shiites in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

The coward beat feet to Britain, likely lives off of that country’s absurd welfare system.

Right! — “Truth is the best defense against libel” (and slander), a time-honored Anglo-Saxon common law principle. This principle is not, however, as widely and absolutely honored in other legal systems!

Either way, the “rub” would (and will) arise when certain truths (facts) end up being legally declared to be lies. That’s the whole purpose of this ugly OIC/UN exercise. The result: “Gleichschaltung” (a Nazi term from the 30′s, roughly meaning equalization) of our Common Law and Constitutional principles to the lowest common legal denominators of competing systems, like Sharia.

Instead of “unalienable rights” from “God, or nature’s God”, the effect will be that your only human rights will be deemed to be those accorded to you by your sovereign state, subject to change at any time.

Such a move will, in other words, knock out the entire philosophical foundation of our Constitutional Republic, inherited from the Enlightenment via our Founding Fathers. A first order catastrophe!

All this will lead to another global war, if the West wants it or not. The Western countries are under attack, since decades, of course on a small burner, and soon it’ll blow up. Once that happens it’ll ignite what everyone fears the most.
The future will belong to the ones that opposed and are opposing the islamic madness.

Anybody still believe this IS NOT the End Times? If you do, or if you have doubts, look up Matthew 24-25 and refresh yourself. There is nothing to argue against this very real truth. Just for one insight: Do you realize that this is the first time in the history of Earth that the Gospel IS being preached to all nations and everybody individually. Think about that.

Britain’s brave heroes fought fiercely against God-hater Hitler and his vile Nazis but now Britain is spat upon by those who HATE Britain and HATE Brits. Anti human rights freedom-haters have taken over the country. Prime Minister Cameron and other ruling elites bow down to the god of Islam. Are they given orders every week from Saudi Arabia, Obama and George Soros how to deal with patriotic freedom-fighters?

Britain’s defenseless non-Muslim children are offered up as a sacrifice to Islam. Many thousands of Britain’s terrorized children have been gang-raped and dreadfully abused by Muslim monsters. There are thousands of child victims in just one area alone of England. UK ruling elites have allowed it. They are complicit and they increase child rape by CONTINUING TO COLONIZE BRITAIN WITH MUSLIMS.

Tommy Robinson, Kevin Carroll and Paul Weston of British Freedom have strongly protested these terrible crimes against Britain’s terrified children. TOMMY ROBINSON IS BEING PUNISHED FOR PROTESTING.

The entire nation should be out in the streets protesting the dreadful Muslim crimes against children and protesting Tommy jailed for protesting.

britishfreedom: South Yorkshire Police and Rotherham Council Are Complicit in Child-Rape
…thousands of predominately Pakistani Muslim gang rapes of white English girls in the Rotherham area.

The history of Islam’s practitioners speaks for itself. Islam, by the very nature of its own doctrine, history and by the actions of its followers has shown itself to be the existential enemy of Western civilization. Dr. Andrew Bostom’s The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims
provides insight into Islamic history and the Islamic mindset and what its ascendancy might mean for the rest of us:

If anyone is still having trouble wrapping their minds around the fact that Western civilization does in fact have mortal and existential enemies, take a quick turn through Lee Harris’ Civilization and Its Enemies

Let us also dispense with the idea that Islam is a religion. Islam is not so much a religion as it is a supremacist, totalitarian political ideology, a destructive and murderous meme impervious to moderation or change, and with a narrowly circumscribed set of rituals that define every aspect of its followers’ lives. As for ‘tolerance’, here’s a quote from the Muslim Brotherhood and their mission in the U.S, calling for…

“…a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

Speaking to the “Islam is a religion of peace,” assertion that we hear from Muslims and ignorant (yes, ignorant) Westerners, when Muslims assert that Islam is a “religion of peace” they are not engaging in al taqqiya, they are actually making an assertion in good faith.

The problem lies in the fact that Islam has, from the Western point of view, a defective concept of peace. In semitic languages like Arabic, the consonants are the “root” of the word: islam = submission, and salam = peace have the same root, slm.

The only concept of peace in Islamic jurisprudence is the peace between the conqueror and the conquered, between master and slave. There is no concept of a negotiated peace between nations in Islamic law (note that law is the defining property of Islam—their clerics are jurists, schools of Qu’ranic interpretation are called fiqh, a legalistic term)—Muslims may negotiate a “hudna” or armistice of limited duration with non-Muslim, but not a definitive enduring peace.

In that regard, Islam was, is and will continue to be a serial murderer of entire cultures and peoples. This is precisely what Islam has done throughout its entire 1400 year history. This is what it has done whenever it has finally gotten the upper hand in whatever culture it has infiltrated. This is what has been inextricably interwoven into the DNA of its operating system. Those whom Islam does not destroy, it enslaves, diminishes and impoverishes. Islam strives for the conversion, enslavement or death of all who do not conform to its cruel and sadistic vision of Mankind. Advocates of Islamic ‘reform’ are sadly mistaken and deluded. Islam cannot be ‘reformed’ in the light of our Western values of humanity and freedom. Were that so, it would no longer be Islam. For its psychopathic and brutal misogyny alone, Islam is an abomination and worthy only of extinction. The best and most concise description of the Arabic/Islamic mindset was laid out almost as an aside by noted historian and philosopher, Carroll Quigley in his landmark Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time. Here, he describes what he characterized as The Pakistani-Peruvian axis. An excerpt from that work is shown below:

Another aspect of Arabic society is the scorn of honest, steady manual work, especially agricultural work. This is a consequence of the fusion of at least three ancient influences. First, the archaic bureaucratic structure of Asiatic despotism, in which the peasants supported the warriors and scribes, regarded manual workers, especially tillers of the soil, as the lowest layer of society, and regarded the acquisition of literacy and military prowess as the chief roads to escape from physical drudgery. Second, the fact that Classical Antiquity, whose influence on the subsequent Islamic civilization was very great, was based on slavery, and came to regard agricultural (or other manual) work as fit for slaves, also contributed to this idea. Third, the Bedouin tradition of pastoral, warlike nomads scorned tillers of the soil as weak and routine persons of no real spirit or character, fit to be conquered or walked on but not to be respected. The combination of these three formed the lack of respect of manual work that is so characteristic of the Pakistani-Peruvian axis.

Somewhat similar to this lack of respect for manual work are a number of other aspects of traditional Arab life that have spread the length of the Pakistani-Peruvian axis. The chief source of many of these is the Bedouin outlook, which originally reflected the attitudes of relatively small group of the Islamic culture but which, because they were a superior, conquering group, came to be copied by others in the society, even by the despised agricultural workers.

These attitudes include lack of respect for the soil, for vegetation, for most animals, and for outsiders. These attitudes, which are singularly ill-fitted for the geographic and climatic conditions of the whole Pakistani-Peruvian area, are to be seen constantly in the everyday life of that area as erosion, destruction of vegetation and wild life, personal cruelty and callousness to most living things, including one’s fellow men, and a general harshness and indifference to God’s creation. This final attitude, which well reflects the geographic conditions of the area, which seem as harsh and indifferent as man himself, is met by those men who must face it in their daily life as a resigned submission to fate and to the inhumanity of man to man.

Interestingly enough, these attitudes have successfully survived the efforts of the three great religions of ethical monotheism, native to the area, to change these attitudes. The ethical sides of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam sought to counteract harshness, egocentricity, tribalism, cruelty, scorn of work and of one’s fellow creatures, but these efforts, on the whole, have met with little success throughout the length of the Pakistani-Peruvian axis. Of the three, Christianity, possibly because it set the highest standards of the three, has fallen furthest from achieving its aims. Love, humility, brotherhood, cooperation, the sanctity of work, the fellowship of community, the image of man as a fellow creature made in the image of God, respect for women as personalities and partners of men, mutual helpmates on the road to spiritual salvation, and the vision of our universe, with all of its diversity, complexity, and multitude of creatures, as a reflection of the power and goodness of God – these basic aspects of Christ’s teachings are almost totally lacking throughout the Pakistani-Peruvian axis and most notably absent on the “Christian” portion of that axis from Sicily, or even the Aegean Sea, westward to Baja California and Tierra del Fuego.

Throughout the whole axis, human actions are not motivated by these “Christian virtues,” but by the more ancient Arabic personality traits, which become vices and sins in the Christian outlook: harshness, envy, lust, greed, selfishness, cruelty, and hatred.

Quigley believed that Islam possessed an “ethical” aspect; in that respect, it is entirely self-consistent within its own cultural sphere. However that may be, it is overshadowed and essentially silenced by the actions of its adherents. It is anathema to the Western sphere. As I have previously stated, Islam is an abomination and worthy only of extinction.

hell, No one is going to stop this, your special amendment rights got flushed the minute voter fraud happened and nothing was done to stop that.
1st and 2d are soon to be history, fight back? Americans are too fat, dumb and happy to move their bulbous asses to fight for their rights.
The citizens won’t notice till their tweets start being banned for breaking sharia law and the religious police start banging on their doors.
Nope those rights are gone and nothing short of a total change of view by the Media, democrats, republicans and Hollywood will save them.
I expect next will be the 4th and 5th amendments as well as the 13th will fall too.
Islam won, so did Obama, we lost, American’s don’t care, end of story.

Defamation of Islam ? Oh my goodness graicious ! Why would anyone in the whole world try to defame people who condone killing your own sons and daughters ? Or defame anyone like the rich Saudis who have little boy toys ? Or anyone like the newly empowered Egyptians that came out in favor of female mutilation ? Or anyone like the muslims in Myanmar that slaughter Christians in the street ? Or anyone reading a holy book that explains how to have sex with animals ? Or anyone who reveres the same book that allows one to lie to anyone of another belief, and kill or enslave them ?
Why, anyone that would defame such sweet people must be really racist, bigoted, and worse yet, islamophobic, huh ?

That was awesome….you summed it up in a nutshell, that is the cracked nuts that no one can possibly take seriously. Taught at an academy, at one of those 150 charter schools here in the US run by a cult of turk muslims, the leader of which claims to be the world’s foremost scholar..and dig this, Fetullah Gulen only went to fifth grade. He lives in the Poconos for his head is wanted in Turkey. Any turk journalists promoting free speech and democracy have been jailed the last few years, no small thanks to the creep gulen greaser. Turkey is the land where women give no Thanksgiving as their gobbler and ghoulish men are birds of a different feather. Meaning that over 85% of the women are victims of domestic abuse. And that’s just for starters. NPR ran a documentary months ago about the Turkish sex slave industry where girls are kidnapped, forced to service at least a dozen brutish monsters each day. If they get pregnant, they’re taken to a turk butcher to be aborted, sent back the same day to service more animals even if still bleeding. And this is the religion of peace we are told…nope ’tain’t that at all, more like the religion of ‘get a piece’ of any gal not a muslim and beat the crap out of her, like muhammed dick tates to his dickhead adherents. Happening all over the UK now at the hands of, er, the Paki pricks picking on english girls doing the gang rape bit. For this, each and everyone of those whackjobs should have their privates whacked off by a bobby.

Tommy Robinson’s letter from jail: (Tommy is from Luton). Luton is one of the UK’s largest Islamist communities. Named by American authorities as the biggest terrorist breeding ground in Europe! I see it as my duty to help spread the word and put out the truth about the ideology of Islam. Luton is the blueprint for every town and city in Britain. Britain and Europe are the blueprints for the US and Canada. It will all happen so quick, helped by the uncontrollable demographics and birth rates.

I am now being held in solitary confinement. Locked up 23.5 hours a day, not allowed to mix with any of the prison population. For my own safety apparently! I’m in the block, a victorian dungeon at the bottom of the prison.

Not allowed fresh air, to go gym, education, basically not allowed to do anything, because the prison is petrified as to what might happen with the Muslim prisoners, as they all want to kill me! Religion of peace…..

Yet another eye-opener about how Islam rules by fear. The authorities do nothing to combat it, and many white and black prisoners are being converted in prison. A prison officer told me stories about prisoners being bullied to convert.

The Imam is a Salafi and polluting the minds of vulnerable english youths. The only way forward will be Muslim and non Muslim wings.

EDL (English Defence League): “Tommy has been locked up since October 24th, and is accused of ‘conspiring to cause a public nuisance’ and passport irregularities following his trip to New York earlier this year.”

WE ARE ALL TOMMY ROBINSON!

DAILY MAIL: Hate preacher Abu Qatada issued orders to kill British and American civilians after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, according to a secret MI5 report seen by The Mail on Sunday.

The Security Service document has raised questions as to why Qatada – who the British Government has tried and failed to deport to Jordan – has not been put on trial in the UK for inciting murder.

Savage Muslim terrorists are adored by UK ruling elites. They and their very large families are well taken care of by ruling elites who provide Muslim terrorists with free houses, free money and free everything. PATRIOTIC BRITS are in danger of losing their jobs and are persecuted and sometimes jailed.

I’m going to say this before they try to stop me. I wish ALL muslims would just die. I wish they all would suddenly want to become martyrs and start killing each other so they all could go be with their demonic god and his false prophet. Did I offend anyone or did I just tell the truth. You better believe I told the whole truth and that’s not offensive at all.

The Imamas within Islam do not want their students to learn the god, known as Allah to the world, is 1 of 360 gods at the Kaabba Muhammad made all worship as the only god. Muhammad who murdered, and raped most of his adult life enjoyed child sex too. This is Islam in a nut shell, and why Islam does not want anyone in the New Age to know the true truth about their pagan religion/political system.

The above written true truth is hate speech in the New Age. Welcome to the New Age. If you write the truth about Islam you will get a fatwa of death.

The muslim ideology is all about hate, revenge, intolerance, violence and lying to gain advantage over your enemy – it’s all about might-makes-right extortion, aka CRIME.

So why does it now always seem to be “illegal” to accuse these moslem criminals of their crimes, if doing so might hurt their feelings (and so “make” them commit even more crimes!)? Simply because:

Liberals are racists – they always assume that ONLY White, Western people (including, of course, the Jews in Israel,) are INTELLIGENT enough to be judged guilty of being truly evil, while all their pet “People Of Colour” (including, of course, the “swarthy palestinians,”) just can’t help being violent animals, the poor oppressed little dears, so they’ll always indulge their crimes, much as one ignores the new puppy as it pees on the rugs.

It is not wrong to demean a so called religion that its whole premise is to enslave or kill all non Muslims .
We have allowed tens of million Muslims into our country while we try to keep out Mexicans.
The Muslims did not come to avoid religious persecution or to embrace our customs or morals.
The big question is who provided entry to these American haters that they vow to exterminate

he key to understanding this is that they want to “ban all criticism of Islam”. In the Arab world the meaning of slander and defamation are different to their meaning in the West. In our society to defame or slander somebody is to say things about them in public that are not true. In Islam it means to make public something that the person or institution identified does not want made public even if it is true.

This means that all acts of violent or stealth jihad, conducted in the name of Islam, will not be able to be criticized or held up to censure. A very dangerous situation. The Left is OK with this because they probably believe that they can us this to their advantage.