recording methods

Well,my band is going to record for the first time near the end of this summer.And I was wondering,would it be better to record us all at once,or tracking each instrument,give me some pros/cons,etc....i know that it would probably be easier to mix with the tracking method,but I'd still like to hear your thoughts,thanks.

It depends on what they're using to record you on. I usually track all rhythm instruments at once, bass, drums, guitar, then I add one by one, the vocals, solos and aux. stuff. Find out what the studio has. Most likely the engineer(s) will have a way that they prefer and you'll just do what they tell you.

I'd say go digital. Their digital equipment is far better than their analog equip. Plus I've had a lot of experience with ProTools and you can do some really cool things with it. Good luck and let us know how it goes!

Nice, I'd like to hear those. My band is actually in the studio now as well. So I know how you feel. The difference is I own my own studio so I can record however I want whenever, it's a big plus, if you have any questions or anything at any time, PM me. I'm sure I can help you out.

I would defintley record everyone at once, as it will end up making the whole process go quicker, which is usually a plus. My band is in the the process of recording our second demo right now. With the first one we did it individually, as the mixer wasn't big enough to allow us to do more than that. But now we have borrowed a bigger mixer, and we are doing everyone at once. The first one took almost two weeks to do, so far with this new one we have done six tracks in two days. Just my $.02.

Scratch vocal and rhythm guitar tracks, played to a click if the band wants
Track Bass and Drums together
Track Guitar, rhythm first then leads
Track Vocals, after getting lead vocal (either by comping or punching in if needed) do backup vocals.
Add extras, synths, strings, pianos. All the cool stuff that you don't really need but it adds to the sound.

For those on a budget, do it all at once and rerecord what needs to be rerecorded later.

Having the drummer play to a click is an absolute must. I don't care if your Vinnie f$%&*(# Coliuta...put on "the cans"! Its so much less work in the end. Try to get two tracks for yourself- one direct and a mic on your amp and mix the two to taste.

Originally posted by Jontom Having the drummer play to a click is an absolute must. I don't care if your Vinnie f$%&*(# Coliuta...put on "the cans"! Its so much less work in the end. Try to get two tracks for yourself- one direct and a mic on your amp and mix the two to taste.

Click to expand...

Be careful with the click track though. Don't force your drummer to use it. Some really great drummers cannot play to a click track no matter what. Sometimes it will make the recording worse.

When we recorded our demo we went digital and every instrument was isolated and we tracked all at once. That way we were able to do it quickly and not have any bleed over from instrument to instrument. We also wanted a sort of live performance feeling to it. As far as my bass goes, we split the signal with a mic on the cab and a direct line to the board. We later mixed them together.

You have to practice doing that <b>before</b> you record. When your drummer does it the first time in the studio, you're in trouble.

Click to expand...

Even still, like I said, I own a studio so I've seen many many bands record. And some drummers just can't do it, even with practice. It doesn't make them a bad drummer, the click just messes them up. I'd certainly say have your drummer practice with a click and if he can do it, definitely record with a click, it's the only way to know you're right on beat.

Originally posted by Rick Blanc When we recorded our demo we went digital and every instrument was isolated and we tracked all at once. That way we were able to do it quickly and not have any bleed over from instrument to instrument. We also wanted a sort of live performance feeling to it. As far as my bass goes, we split the signal with a mic on the cab and a direct line to the board. We later mixed them together.

Click to expand...

That's probably the best way to record if you're trying to get in and out quick. You get a good live feeling and it doesn't take weeks to record. However, many small studios don't have enough isolation booths to do this properly.

How did the bass end up sounding. I usually record the bass in the same way, but I know other engineers who have trouble and end up only using one of the signals.

That's probably the best way to record if you're trying to get in and out quick. You get a good live feeling and it doesn't take weeks to record. However, many small studios don't have enough isolation booths to do this properly.

How did the bass end up sounding. I usually record the bass in the same way, but I know other engineers who have trouble and end up only using one of the signals.

Click to expand...

It was the first time I was ever in a studio so I really didn't know how to get what I wanted. I discribed the quality of tone I wanted to the engineer and he came very close. But I wanted alittle more growl. Overall though it came out very good. We have some MP3's herehttp://www.roadhouse5.com/
and let me know what you think.