Here are a couple of the images. These will be gone by tomorrow and would be replaced with new data.

IC/BJT, Baijiatuan, Beijing, China

IC/ENH, Enshi, China

Every one of the seismographs from China show more or less the same pattern. This is very strange, I have never seen this before.

It looks as if the readings are being interrupted from 2 minutes up to 2 complete hours. It does not seem that the seismographs are broken, but it is
something happening in CHina.

(update)

I have also noticed that in almost every other seismograph around the world there is also one or two of these interruptions but lasting from 2 to 3
hours. In some places the interruption was much longer, lasting several hours.

The rest of the world's seismographs interruptions all started happening at around 11:52 AM... everyone of them started more or less around that
time. Something definetely is going on, and the source seems to have started and was stronger in China at 10:07 AM.

Update.

In New Mexico US the interruption lasted for almost 6 hours.

in the rest of the world the interruption was for about 2 and a half hours, like in Antarctica.

Noone is replying to this?... What happened in CHina and the rest of the world yesterday is wierd to say the least.

The seismographs are working properly yet they captured interruptions in the readings, as if there was nothing to read for minutes up to three hours.
i do not know if these interruptions are natural, but I would think they are since there was also interruption in the data in the rest of the
seismographs. I don't think anything manmade would affect all the seismographs.

no, a nuclear test would actually leave a reading. this is as if for several hours beginning in China there was nothing happening at all, which is
strange. Then the interruptions in China continued, but for up to 10 minutes or so.

no, it is not a malfunction. All the seismographs wouldn't be giving more or less the same readings. i could be wrong but it seems some sort of
frequency was being used, and it affected the readings, it started in China it seems. But the frequency affected not only China, it affected the rest
of the world also about an hour after it began in China.

Muaddib this is an interesting find. I have no explanantions or logical input but can I suggest someone who is familiar with HAARP could check out
their lastest readings. to see if there is any connection.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data latency is defined as the number of days between the current date and the date of the most recent data we have received for a station. For
example, a latency of 55 days for station X means that, as of today, the most recent data we have for station X is from 55 days ago. Note that
latencies for some stations are frequently large due to known shipping delays (e.g. data tapes from Antarctic stations can only be shipped at certain
times of the year).

I have not compared the latency for the other stations that you mention, but I daresay that they do not correlate as closely as each station page may
have had you think.
But this doesn't explain how or why the readings are being interrupted.

Originally posted by ilandrah
The data that you quote above is actually out of date. Below is the latency page from your site as well as the table for the Chinese stations that you
refer to.

You are actually not understanding what it is they are trying to explain about latency data. When any data is out of date, they say the data from
station x has a latency of x days. So if any data is out of date, they will put a message saying the latency the data has, otherwise the date is up
to date and refreshed "supposedly" every 30 minutes.

Well, I have not seen it happening to seismic data, but there is an effect known as the standing wave null, which is a dead area where the signal can
no longer be picked up. This normally happens because the wave is being reflected off a metal plate or another major source of discontinuance like
water. Or it could be that an opposite signal is being emitted which is the reason why there are nulls in the data. I actually think it is very
likely it is the latter.

If you look at what the stations are picking up in different parts in China, the nulls are happening at almost the same time. I highly doubt that the
source of the nulls is because the wave is being reflected. it is very likely that there seems to be some sort of experiment going on in China having
to do with frequencies. I could be wrong thou.

Who knows, maybe even the very remote change the american army is probing Nkorea for underground structures, I guess they would be send multiple waves
of non-measurable frequincies during the breaks, those could perhaps interfere at the focuspoint and be bounced back as measurable patterns, the
discrete breaks could also serve to calculate the distinction between the artificial signal and natural earth generated noise...

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.