Tuesday, August 14, 2018

"Who Profits From Iran’s Oil Major Exodus?" (Katona). Russia and China. One of the peculiarities of the American ultra-sanctioning war is that many companies are already under full sanctions, and thus are effectively immune from further sanctions.

Related: "Caspian Sea Convention Signed to Open New Prospects for Region" (Korzun) (big!) and "Could a pipeline of peace help unite Northeast Asia?" (Salmon) (helpful hint if you want it to succeed: leave the Assholians out of it!) and "Where does Imran Khan’s government stand on China’s Belt and Road?" (Hussain) and "US Supplying Massive Amounts of LNG Gas to Europe is More Hot Air than Reality" (Silverman) (white elephant LNG ports are so imperial decline!).

"The European Stability Initiative
think-tank of Soros-tied Gerald Knaus is financed by an impressive list
of donors. Their website lists them.

The list includes, in addition to Soros’
Open Society Foundations, the Soros-tied German Stiftung Mercator, and
the Robert Bosch Stiftung. ESI funders also include European Commission.
Then, curiously enough the funder list for The Merkel Plan includes an
organization with the Orwellian name, The United States Institute of
Peace.

Some research reveals that the United
States Institute of Peace has anything but a peace-loving background.
The United States Institute of Peace is chaired by Stephen Hadley,
former US National Security Council adviser during the neo-conservative
war-waging Bush-Cheney administration. Its Board of Directors includes
Ashton B. Carter, current Obama Administration neo-conservative hawkish
Secretary of Defense; Secretary of State John Kerry; Major General
Frederick M. Padilla, President of the US National Defense University.
These are some very seasoned architects of the US Pentagon Full Spectrum
Dominance strategy for world military domination.

The “Merkel Plan” authors at the
European Stability Initative, in addition to the largesse of George
Soros’ foundations, list as “core” funder, the German Marshall Fund of
the United States. As I describe in my book, The Think Tanks, the German
Marshall Fund is anything but German. With its seat in Washington, as I
noted in the book, “It’s an American think tank with its headquarters
in Washington, D.C. In point of fact, its agenda is the deconstruction
of postwar Germany and more broadly of the sovereign states of the EU to
fit them better into the Wall Street globalization agenda.”

The German Marshall Fund of Washington
has been involved in the post-1990 USA agenda of regime change around
the world in league with the US-funded National Endowment for Democracy,
Soros Foundations, and the CIA front called USAID. As I describe it in
the think tanks book, “The major focus of the German Marshall Fund
according to its 2013 Annual Report was to support the US State
Department agenda for so-called democracy-building operations in former
communist countries in eastern and south-eastern Europe, from the
Balkans to the Black Sea. Significantly their work included Ukraine. In
most instances, they worked together with the USAID, widely identified
as a CIA front with ties to the State Department, and the Stewart Mott
Foundation which gives funds to the US Government-funded National
Endowment for Democracy.”

Notably, the same Stewart Mott Foundation is also a funder of the ESI-authored Merkel Plan, as is the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

This all should give pause for
reflection as to who and for what goals the Merkel-Erdogan deal for
dealing with the EU refugee crisis is intended. Does the
Rockefeller-Bush-Clinton faction in the United States intend to use it
as a major social engineering experiment to create chaos and social
conflict across the EU at the same time their NGOs such as the NED,
Freedom House and the Soros Foundations are stirring things up in Syria
and Libya and across the Islamic world? Is Germany, as former US
presidential adviser and Rockefeller crony, Zbigniew Brzezinski called
her, a “vassal” of US power in the post-1990 world? To date the evidence
is pretty strong that that’s the case. The role of US and NATO-linked
think tanks is central to get an understanding of how the Federal
Republic of Germany and the European Union are actually controlled from
behind the Atlantic curtain."

"Canada's feigned concern for "human rights" in Saudi Arabia comes at a time when the Canadian government continues approving of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of arms sales to Riyadh. This includes small arms and armored personnel carriers Saudi forces are using in their ongoing invasion and occupation of neighboring Yemen.

The feigned divide between Ottawa and Washington over Saudi human rights violations is overshadowed by years of commitment by both North American nations in propping up the Saudi regime, and aiding and abetting the very worst of Riyadh's human rights abuses unfolding amid the Yemeni conflict.

Canada's apparent role is to help compartmentalize the worst of the West's decaying moral authority, containing it with the US, and taking up a more prominent role in the West's industrialized "human rights" and "democracy" leveraging racket.

While Canadian armaments help fuel genocide in Yemen - Canadian diplomats around the world fund agitators and directly meddle in the internal political affairs of foreign nations predicated on promoting "human rights" and "democracy."

In Thailand for example, the US has receded into the shadows, allowing Canada, the UK, and other European nations to openly engage in political meddling on their behalf. US funding and support continues, but the public face of Western "outrage" is increasingly becoming Canadian, British, and Northern European.

However, Canada faces the same problem that has permanently eroded American credibility. And as its role in perpetuating real human rights abuses worldwide continues to be exposed, its feigned concern over token or even manufactured human rights concerns will increasingly appear hypocritical and hollow, undermining the West's collective ability to leverage and hide behind human rights and democracy to advance their self-serving agendas."

The complicated mobile phone conspiracy you won't read about anywhere else: "The Great Charlottesville Hack of 2018: A Message to the People of Charlottesville" (weev).

"Who Profits From Iran’s Oil Major Exodus?" (Katona). Russia and China. One of the peculiarities of the American ultra-sanctioning war is that many companies are already under full sanctions, and thus are effectively immune from further sanctions.

Related: "Caspian Sea Convention Signed to Open New Prospects for Region" (Korzun) (big!) and "Could a pipeline of peace help unite Northeast Asia?" (Salmon) (helpful hint if you want it to succeed: leave the Assholians out of it!) and "Where does Imran Khan’s government stand on China’s Belt and Road?" (Hussain) and "US Supplying Massive Amounts of LNG Gas to Europe is More Hot Air than Reality" (Silverman) (white elephant LNG ports are so imperial decline!).

"The European Stability Initiative
think-tank of Soros-tied Gerald Knaus is financed by an impressive list
of donors. Their website lists them.

The list includes, in addition to Soros’
Open Society Foundations, the Soros-tied German Stiftung Mercator, and
the Robert Bosch Stiftung. ESI funders also include European Commission.
Then, curiously enough the funder list for The Merkel Plan includes an
organization with the Orwellian name, The United States Institute of
Peace.

Some research reveals that the United
States Institute of Peace has anything but a peace-loving background.
The United States Institute of Peace is chaired by Stephen Hadley,
former US National Security Council adviser during the neo-conservative
war-waging Bush-Cheney administration. Its Board of Directors includes
Ashton B. Carter, current Obama Administration neo-conservative hawkish
Secretary of Defense; Secretary of State John Kerry; Major General
Frederick M. Padilla, President of the US National Defense University.
These are some very seasoned architects of the US Pentagon Full Spectrum
Dominance strategy for world military domination.

The “Merkel Plan” authors at the
European Stability Initative, in addition to the largesse of George
Soros’ foundations, list as “core” funder, the German Marshall Fund of
the United States. As I describe in my book, The Think Tanks, the German
Marshall Fund is anything but German. With its seat in Washington, as I
noted in the book, “It’s an American think tank with its headquarters
in Washington, D.C. In point of fact, its agenda is the deconstruction
of postwar Germany and more broadly of the sovereign states of the EU to
fit them better into the Wall Street globalization agenda.”

The German Marshall Fund of Washington
has been involved in the post-1990 USA agenda of regime change around
the world in league with the US-funded National Endowment for Democracy,
Soros Foundations, and the CIA front called USAID. As I describe it in
the think tanks book, “The major focus of the German Marshall Fund
according to its 2013 Annual Report was to support the US State
Department agenda for so-called democracy-building operations in former
communist countries in eastern and south-eastern Europe, from the
Balkans to the Black Sea. Significantly their work included Ukraine. In
most instances, they worked together with the USAID, widely identified
as a CIA front with ties to the State Department, and the Stewart Mott
Foundation which gives funds to the US Government-funded National
Endowment for Democracy.”

Notably, the same Stewart Mott Foundation is also a funder of the ESI-authored Merkel Plan, as is the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

This all should give pause for
reflection as to who and for what goals the Merkel-Erdogan deal for
dealing with the EU refugee crisis is intended. Does the
Rockefeller-Bush-Clinton faction in the United States intend to use it
as a major social engineering experiment to create chaos and social
conflict across the EU at the same time their NGOs such as the NED,
Freedom House and the Soros Foundations are stirring things up in Syria
and Libya and across the Islamic world? Is Germany, as former US
presidential adviser and Rockefeller crony, Zbigniew Brzezinski called
her, a “vassal” of US power in the post-1990 world? To date the evidence
is pretty strong that that’s the case. The role of US and NATO-linked
think tanks is central to get an understanding of how the Federal
Republic of Germany and the European Union are actually controlled from
behind the Atlantic curtain."

"Canada's feigned concern for "human rights" in Saudi Arabia comes at a time when the Canadian government continues approving of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of arms sales to Riyadh. This includes small arms and armored personnel carriers Saudi forces are using in their ongoing invasion and occupation of neighboring Yemen.

The feigned divide between Ottawa and Washington over Saudi human rights violations is overshadowed by years of commitment by both North American nations in propping up the Saudi regime, and aiding and abetting the very worst of Riyadh's human rights abuses unfolding amid the Yemeni conflict.

Canada's apparent role is to help compartmentalize the worst of the West's decaying moral authority, containing it with the US, and taking up a more prominent role in the West's industrialized "human rights" and "democracy" leveraging racket.

While Canadian armaments help fuel genocide in Yemen - Canadian diplomats around the world fund agitators and directly meddle in the internal political affairs of foreign nations predicated on promoting "human rights" and "democracy."

In Thailand for example, the US has receded into the shadows, allowing Canada, the UK, and other European nations to openly engage in political meddling on their behalf. US funding and support continues, but the public face of Western "outrage" is increasingly becoming Canadian, British, and Northern European.

However, Canada faces the same problem that has permanently eroded American credibility. And as its role in perpetuating real human rights abuses worldwide continues to be exposed, its feigned concern over token or even manufactured human rights concerns will increasingly appear hypocritical and hollow, undermining the West's collective ability to leverage and hide behind human rights and democracy to advance their self-serving agendas."

The complicated mobile phone conspiracy you won't read about anywhere else: "The Great Charlottesville Hack of 2018: A Message to the People of Charlottesville" (weev).