Cecilia Sue: Boon Gay inserted his dick into me, but did not ejaculate inside

The constant flip-flop by the prosecution star witness in the trial of former Central Narcotics Bureau chief Ng Boon Gay not only cast doubt on her testimony, but shifted public opinion in favor of Ng as well.

Ng was charged with one count of corruptly obtaining sexual gratification from IT sales representative Cecilia Sue Siew Nang in return for contracts which can see him spend 5 years behind the bar.

The defense argued that Ng only had an affair with Cecilia and was not corrupt.

During the third day of the trial yesterday, Ng’s lawyer Tan Chee Meng revealed excerpts from Cecilia’s statement given to CPIB which painted a different picture of what happened:

The pair was supposed to meet at Great World City one day in 2009, and when they reached a service apartment he rented for his mother after which Ng made his ‘move’:

“Boon Gay started to hug and kiss me and that he quickly striped himself of clothes…He shifted my panties to insert his private part in me. He was very fast… he did not ejaculate inside me. When he was lying down, I gave him a blowjob. I blew him on his private part for awhile. During this occasion, he ejaculated in my mouth. I recall because I spit out his ejaculation out in the bathroom toilet. I didn’t tell anyone… I was in a daze… I feel more liking for Boon Gay.”

When questioned by Tan, Cecilia flip-flopped and admitted that she gave false information to CPIB:

“I admit the initial statement with CPIB wasn’t truthful enough because that was the first time I was brought in by CPIB. I was confused… I had no sleep.”

Will the authorities now investigate Cecilia for giving false information to a civil servant under Section 182 of the Penal Code or will they continue to act blur and allow her to make a mockery of our justice system in public?

Share this:

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on September 28, 2012 at 12:18 pm and is filed under News.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

18 Responses to “Cecilia Sue: Boon Gay inserted his dick into me, but did not ejaculate inside”

teo cheap buysaid

This is ridicules, she is changing her testimony statement every now and then.
And seriously, sex-related activities should consider mutual unless Boon Gay spike her drink which in whatever case I don’t see it at all.

Malcolmsaid

Mike Zengsaid

Look at the bright side…..if the child is scholar NBG’s, she will inherit his brilliant genes and grow up to be like him, a high-flyer top professional in whatever field.
Always look at the bigger picture and the future!

ALAMAKsaid

SINGAPOREANS ALL SAY PRC, MALAY, PINOYS ARE SLUTS BUT THE TRUTH IS THEIR WOMEN ARE MORE BITCH AND WHORE,, NOT ASHAMED OF SPEAKING OUT IN PUBLIC THAT THEY SUCK DICK.. SINGAPOREAN WOMEN ARE BITCHES. COSTLIEST BLOW JOBS IN THE WORLD. AND TO THINK THAT SLUT WOMAN IS AN EDUCATED SALES EXECUTIVE. ALAMAKKKKK

Poor man, manipulated by a woman who is well practiced and extremely knowledgeable on how to please men keep them “HAPPY.” It is obvious that she was willing to do anything to get him to sign the contract with whichever company she was with at the time. It seems that she is purpose driven to tote up a significant commission that she would enjoy through the unsuspecting man in question. He was framed not the woman.

Ronsaid

This whole case is no longer about what official position the accused had. It is all about lust and sex and has nothing to do with any commercial transactions. As the PM has said before…”one way or the other we will settle the matter” . Let’s see the judgment.

The Prosecution has said it is up to the accused to prove there was no corrupt intent. Well, there was copulation not corruption so far as revealed in cross-examination.

Raymondsaid

rover2sgsaid

He sure is one “speedy gonzales”. Defence counsel seems to be enjoying himself on CS. But he will blow his own case as the fact he is confirming if that Ng did received gratification whilst he was in a position of influence!

Zhunjisaid

Sigh, why must the proceedings of the trial come to this level of details?? Is this even necessary? Or just a well-timed (or may be well-designed) decoy to distract Singaporeans from the real issues of the day?