1. A wife is permitted
to serve her husband and his guests if she is wearing complete hijaab and nothing
of her body can be seen. She is also permitted to sit with them so long as there
is no sitting alone with one non-mahram* man, wanton display or other cause
of temptation involved.

As far as eating with them is concerned, if this involves uncovering some part
of her body, then she should not eat with them.

2. The husband's brother is not a mahram. The various types of mahram have been
described in the Qur'aan, and this matter has already been explained under question
# 316. On this basis, it is not permitted for her
to travel with him.

In view of the seriousness of the matter of non-mahram men, especially the husband's
relatives, entering upon women, and the fact that so many people take this matter
lightly, there follow a few words of important advice:

Warning against non-mahram relatives entering upon women in the absence of
their husbands

Some homes are not free of the presence of relatives of the husband who are
not mahrams of his wife. They may be living with him for a number of reasons,
such as brothers who are students or bachelors. These men enter the house without
there being any sense of something strange, because they are known to the neighbours
as relatives of the head of the household. The neighbours know that this is
a brother, or nephew or uncle. This casual approach leads to many immoral deeds
that earn the wrath of Allaah because the limits that He has prescribed are
not being adhered to. The basic principle in this matter should be the hadeeth
of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him): "Beware of entering upon women." A man of the Ansaar asked,
"O Messenger of Allaah, what do you think about the brother-in-law?"
He said, "The brother-in-law is death." (Reported
by al-Bukhaari, Fath al-Baari, 9/330)

Al-Nawawi, may Allaah have mercy on him, said: This hadeeth refers to all the
relatives of the husband apart from his father and sons, who are mahrams for
the wife and she is allowed to be alone with them; they are not described as
"death." It refers to the brother, nephew, uncle, cousin and other
relatives of the husband whom she would be permitted to marry if she were not
already married. Because people customarily treat this matter so lightly, and
a man may sit alone with his brother's wife, the brother-in-law is likened to
death, and he is the foremost among non-mahram men who should be prevented from
doing so.

The expression "the brother-in-law is death" may have a number of
meanings, such as the following:

That being alone with a brother-in-law
may lead to religious doom if it results in sin.

That it may lead to actual death if
an immoral deed is committed that dictates the punishment of stoning.

That it may spell disaster for the
woman if her husband's jealousy leads to divorce.

That you should fear being alone with
a non-mahram woman as much as you fear death.

That being alone with a non-mahram
woman is as terrible as death.

All of this stems
from the fact that Islam wants to preserve families and households, and prevent
anything that could lead to their destruction. What do you say now, after hearing
the warning of the Prophet (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) about those husbands who say to their wives: "If
my brother comes and I am not here, show him into the sitting-room" or
a woman who says to a male visitor: "Go into the sitting room" - when
there is no-one else present in the house?

To those who take the idea of trustworthiness as an excuse, and say things like,
"I trust my wife and I trust my brother or my cousin," we say: do
not trust too much and do not doubt too much, but know that the hadeeth "No
man sits alone with a (non-mahram) woman, but the Shaytaan is the third among
them" (reported by al-Tirmidhi, 1171)
includes both the most righteous of people as well as the most immoral of people,
and that Islam makes no exceptions whatsoever in such reports.

A real problem

This is the problem: a man marries a woman and brings her to his family's home,
where she lives happily with him, then his younger brother starts to enter upon
her when her husband is absent, and they begin to talk in an affectionate or
even passionate manner. This leads to two things: she begins to detest her husband,
and grows attached to his brother, but she cannot divorce her husband, or do
what she wants to with the other. This is the grievous torment. This story represents
one aspect of corruption, besides which are other kinds which reach the level
of immoral sexual conduct and illegitimate children.

In answer to the second question, a woman is not permitted to travel with her
husband's brother, who is not her mahram, because the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "A woman should not travel
unless she is with a mahram, and no man should enter upon a woman unless she
has a mahram with her." (Reported by al-Bukhaari, 1729).
Among the conditions of a mahram for travel purposes are: he should be someone
whom she is permanently forbidden to marry, such as her grandfather, father,
brother, paternal uncle, nephew, etc. And Allaah knows best.

* Translator's note: "mahram" refers to a blood-relative to whom marriage
is permanently forbidden, such as a woman's father, brother, son, uncle, etc.