<quoted text>Go back and re-read your posts.Every couple of weeks you admit that you were wrong.If you want to recant, then be specific. Tell me which point EXACTLY you disagree with?Is it that Egypt exists?Is it that a dictionary contains definitions of words?Is it which words are or are not in a certain definition?These are all pretty straight forward points.What's giving you all the trouble comprehending them?

Bugging lost the argument, so he's going to try to get you to argue against the fact that Egypt exist. This clown would be thrown out of court in any ordinary rational fact-based debate.

<quoted text>Wow Skippy, you've just demonstrated that you don't even know the meaning of the word "all".What a hell of a way to start off 2013.Seriously, is there anyone in your house who speaks English?

Hello? Care to use facts? Actual arguments to make you points?

You shoot your mouth off, then people correct you. Then you get all uppity an accuse them of denying Egypt - because well hey there's an argument you cant actually lose eh?!

You misdirect people into your web of absurdity in order to cover over your underlying horsh*t utterances.

you don't even know what the burden of proof means, I suggest you go back to AOL with your all caps and lose a debate with someone your mental age.

<quoted text>Everyone knows that you are the ad hom queen that thinks more like a creationist than most creationists.

Ironic that you ad hominem again. As hard as you try to lie, atheism is backed by science, rationality and facts, while creationism is backed up by people like you - dishonest, judgemental pr*cks with no morals.

<quoted text>Ironic that you ad hominem again. As hard as you try to lie, atheism is backed by science, rationality and facts, while creationism is backed up by people like you - dishonest, judgemental pr*cks with no morals.

I understand that you are upset that the conversation goes over your head from time to time but you should not blame your inability to think abstractly on the rest of us.You have yet to produce a single comment with me promoting any type of religious belief. You just lie about people in an attempt to discredit them because you can not keep up. It is okay, there is help for you.http://www.scholastic.com/teachers/article/sp...

<quoted text>I understand that you are upset that the conversation goes over your head from time to time but you should not blame your inability to think abstractly on the rest of us.You have yet to produce a single comment with me promoting any type of religious belief. You just lie about people in an attempt to discredit them because you can not keep up. It is okay, there is help for you.http://www.scholastic.com/teachers/article/sp...

You can try to lie as much as you like about you not being a creationist, but the facts speak for themselves.

Like I said before, its better that you just "run away" like you do every single the time the conversation gets too heated in favour of atheism, after your attempts to derail such conversations have failed.

Do us all a favour and leave the forum, and take your creationist buddy, that rat nanoanomaly with you.

<quoted text>You can try to lie as much as you like about you not being a creationist, but the facts speak for themselves.Like I said before, its better that you just "run away" like you do every single the time the conversation gets too heated in favour of atheism, after your attempts to derail such conversations have failed.Do us all a favour and leave the forum, and take your creationist buddy, that rat nanoanomaly with you.

<quoted text>Ironic that you ad hominem again. As hard as you try to lie, atheism is backed by science, rationality and facts, while creationism is backed up by people like you - dishonest, judgemental pr*cks with no morals.

Science doesn't give a fig about atheism. AT BEST you could say atheism may be a reasonable hypothesis based on the evidence so far, but that's about as far as it gets.

And speaking of "no morals" aren't you just another typical lying fundie hypocrite?

<quoted text>You can try to lie as much as you like about you not being a creationist, but the facts speak for themselves.Like I said before, its better that you just "run away" like you do every single the time the conversation gets too heated in favour of atheism, after your attempts to derail such conversations have failed.Do us all a favour and leave the forum, and take your creationist buddy, that rat nanoanomaly with you.

Hey Skip. You've been running away from me for 12 months. Give or take. You managed to formulate a coherent argument yet?

<quoted text>Science doesn't give a fig about atheism. AT BEST you could say atheism may be a reasonable hypothesis based on the evidence so far, but that's about as far as it gets.And speaking of "no morals" aren't you just another typical lying fundie hypocrite?Well uh, yeah you are.(shrug)

Hey Dude that's a bit goofy calling Atheism a hypothesis.It's more like a non statement isn't it? It's exactly like you are trying to shift the burden of proof when you are making the claim. That's sort of revealing.

Ah, nuggin's cheerleader, where would be without you? Just to remind everyone again how much of a coward you are since you were:

1. Cornered for not know what the "burden of proof" means. You expect scientists to go around disproving the imaginations of idiots all day long. The fact that you don't understand this makes you an idiot.

2. For the last two years, running scared & unable to provide me with an example of something that is both real and unfalsifiable.

Keep talking you piece of sh*t with no integrity.

I'll keep repeating these same two points that smack you the f*ck back down to earth every single time.

Whenever we kick nuggin's arse, you seem to pop out of it like some discarded entrail.

<quoted text>Hey Dude that's a bit goofy calling Atheism a hypothesis.It's more like a non statement isn't it?It's exactly like you are trying to shift the burden of proof when you are making the claim. That's sort of revealing.

The dude is full of sh*t and always has been. Nuggin's partner in logic crime.

<quoted text>Ironic that you ad hominem again. As hard as you try to lie, atheism is backed by science, rationality and facts, while creationism is backed up by people like you - dishonest, judgemental pr*cks with no morals.

Skippy, that wasn't an ad hom.

Don't use terms you don't understand. It makes you look even more foolish.

Meanwhile, your description of creationists is just you looking in the mirror.

<quoted text>Hey Dude that's a bit goofy calling Atheism a hypothesis.It's more like a non statement isn't it?It's exactly like you are trying to shift the burden of proof when you are making the claim. That's sort of revealing.

Actually, he said "at best it's a hypothesis", and he's not shifting the "burden of proof" (You are turning into Skippy) since there can be no scientific proof in the matter.

You can not prove that no gods exist any more than someone else could prove that the Christian God does exist.

Such proof would be beyond the ability of science.

However, what is NOT beyond the ability to science is to demonstrate that Ramses, who was a god, actually did exist.

Now, if you'd like to present evidence that Ramses did not exist, I'd love to see it.

<quoted text>Skippy, that wasn't an ad hom.Don't use terms you don't understand. It makes you look even more foolish.Meanwhile, your description of creationists is just you looking in the mirror.Seriously, are you even aware of your previous posts?

Zealots! You can't live with 'em and you can't live without 'em. Or can you?I recommend a choke chain and/or cattle prod.xD

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.