(Update to 2015: NON-whites have now quadrupled to 20% since 1981. An astounding 7,000,000 new foreigners — the vast majority from 3rd world countries — have landed on OUR sovereign soil since then. In just 3 decades, our White European proportional population has plummeted from 95% to about 77% today.)

Canadian values & ethics are eroding fast. The society is disintegrating and is being replaced by alien & sub-civilized cultures – all in the name of multiculturalism & accommodation to new immigrants.

Multiculturalism makes a nation no more than a holding pen. These multi-ethnic people of Canada have failed to integrate even among themselves. Isn’t it foolish to assume that one day they will all live together in one “happy” family? That wishful thinking will turn into a nightmare. In my two decades of “rich multicultural experience”, I’ve yet to see a business owned by, for example, a Chinese-Canadian or Indo-Canadian or a Pakistani-Canadian, employing anybody outsidetheir own ethnic group. The exceptions are far & few between. The policy of multiculturalism has failed drastically. It has become a one-way street : “You give & we take”. [<<click]

Some of my family members settled in this country a century ago, but they came here to live in & adopt the ways of Canadian society. Their goal was to assimilate, whereas now, I see that East Indian (and all other immigrants) are flocking to Canada not to assimilate, but to berate & hate Canadian society, create their own ghettos, live in their cocoons – all the while milking all the benefitsCanada has to offer. I would describe what is happening as an ‘invasion’ – not ‘immigration’.

As you’ve correctly mentioned, we need to cut down on our annual immigration numbers drastically. Those high numbers are not only shattering the centuries-old, established morals & principles of this nation and wrecking the lives of existing Canadians, but they are affecting immigrants like me too who came here to adopt a new & morally-superior culture— something which was missing in our own cultures.

Canada’s current immigration policies support cultures which will degrade it. This is not how you make a nation great.

[ThoseVisible-Minority (NON-white) numbers now exceed19% according to the 2011 Census Report. (Update to 2015: Now over 20%, and still rising) The 7,000,000+ foreigners (seven million!) who’ve landed on our sovereign soil only since 1981 is the greatest immigration deception ever perpetrated on WhiteCanadians and who are nowdestined to become a minority-race within the next few decades.]

Just think : What actually does make a nation great, livable & developed?? It is their people. And why are some countries undeveloped and “Third World”? Again, it’s because of their people. So, if we let people from these Third-World countries immigrate into Canada by ship loads, what are they going to bring in with them?? The same ethics, values, etiquette, habits & culture – everything they had in their left-behind, backward societies.

And when these people come in hordes, they will never aspire to, (nor) integrate & assimilate into Canadian society. Therefore, their “NET BENEFIT” to Canadian Society is absolutely ‘ZERO’.

Canada became a great Nation and a developed country because the people who made it like that, emigrated from the developed & moralistic societies of great countries. The only way we can save this once great nation from becoming another backward Third- World country is to cut down onimmigration … especially immigration from Third-World countries.

Because of flawed immigration policies, the UK, Sweden, France, The Netherlands & Belgium, are spiraling down fast and heading towards their (own) demise.

My aim in expressing these opinions is to spread some awareness among my fellow citizens. We all would gain if we worked together and saved Canada from rolling down a path toward National Suicide. Save Canada … while there’s still hope of survival ! >Source

Since January 8 through January 22, the main media (MSM) outlets in Canada have paid considerable attention to my claim that mass immigration threatens Canada’s European character.

It all started back in early June when Vancouver city councillor, Kerry Jang, wrote a formal letter to the administration at The University of New Brunswickcomplaining about my allegedly “racist” views about Chinese Canadians, simply on the grounds that I had published a number of articles in this blog, Council of European Canadians, criticizing a motion passed by Raymond Louie, a Canadian with ancestry from China, urging council to direct staff to investigate discriminatory laws and policies imposed by the government on Chinese immigrants in the city between 1886 and 1947, in order to come up with recommendations for “reconciliation efforts.”

In this article, and a number of subsequent articles, including a formal “reply” to Jang and Louie, I objected to the endless demands for apologies and redresses by Chinese leaders in Vancouver, noting that many apologies and compensation packages had already been offered by various levels of government in Canada starting with Prime Minister Harper’s 2006 apology and $34 million financial compensation.

In the Council of European Canadians, I have written many articles consistent with the promotion and defense of the ethnic interests of European Canadians within the framework of the Canadian Multiculturalism Act of 1988, which guarantees the rights of Canadians of any racial origin to protect and enhance their cultural and ethnic interests in a way that is consistent with the principles of our liberal democratic institutions.A high number of my articles have been on the philosophical and historical aspects of the ideology of immigrant multiculturalism and on the uniqueness of Western Civilization. Readers will notice that these articles have been carefully researched, backed by many sources, involving carefully constructed arguments with some of the foremost scholars favoring Canadian multiculturalism and addressing the dynamics of Western civilization.Since this controversy erupted again in early January, I have been tempted to write a reply to the main articles which have appeared in The Globe and Mail, The National Post, CBC, Global News, The Tyee, four university student papers, and other venues. But the fact that the overwhelming majority of the comments in response to these articles have strongly supported my views and academic freedom to dissent, persuaded me not to offer a reply. I was satisfied too with the endorsement of academic freedom by the journalists at the Globe and Mail, the Post, and the Vancouver Sun.

January 22 article in The Globe and Mail

But yesterday January 22, in what is now the third article in The Globe and Mail about this controversy, threeChinese-Canadians not only disagreed but called upon The University of New Brunswickto censor me on the grounds that my views do not deserve to be expressed by any academic in Canada!

“The purpose of academic freedom is to prevent a chill on the pursuit of knowledge and to safeguard diverse viewpoints. However, in Canada no right is absolute; in the case of academic freedom, this right starts to unravel when academics hide behind academic freedom to espouse untruths that actually inflict harm. If the staff and faculty of UNB are truly committed to academic freedom and academic excellence, they should join the Asian Canadian community in condemning racism in any form in Canada.”

This short, but falsehood-filled article, cannot go unchallenged. The authors are adamantly against my emphasis on the European character of Canada and how mass immigration threatens it.

Yet, a quick examination of the careers of Go, Nipp, and Ng reveals three lives fully dedicated to the promotion of Chinese ethnic interests in Canada combined with the portrayal of European Canadians in a persistently negative way. They eulogize about the “the pursuit of knowledge,” “academic standards,” and the “academic profession” but only Ng has some sort of position at a university.

Ng holds the “CAW-Sam Gindin Chair in Social Justice and Democracy at Ryerson University,” a position described as “the first union-endowed chair at a Canadian University.” Her university profile describes her as an “activist” and states that the “mandate” of the chair is “to create a hub of interaction between social justice activists and academics at Ryerson University.” Strictly speaking, then, Ng is not an academic hired as a professor, but holds a chair financed by a union, “selected not only for her extensive experience in the social justice field but for her research interests in anti-racism, equality, and coalition and capacity building.”

Avvy Go is also not an academic but “director of the Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic.” This clinic is dedicated to “advocacy activities” for selected ethnic groups in Canada, namely, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Laotian communities in Greater Toronto.

These three activists forChinese/Asian interests show no hesitation declaring that:

“Mr. Duchesne spreads falsehoods about an entire community and in doing so betrays the standards of academia by engaging in racial caricature and perpetuating intolerance.”

It is the other way around; in this article, these three Chinese/Asian ethnonationalists spread many falsehoods about what I have said and caricature the entire community of European Canadians by concentrating solely on their “racist” and “colonial” activities.

“Efforts by Asian and African Canadians to claim their rightful place in Canadian history are framed by Mr. Duchesne as “assaulting European civilization”.

[ELN Editor note: Conflating ethnocentric Chinese pursuits with Black people is highly disingenuous. Marxist/leftists often use this method of combining phantom support forces as a protective barrier for weak arguments against their debating opponents. It’s also a power-play designed to muster other forces against the White-majority until those “others” have outlived their usefulness. See: New CHINESE Political Party in Canada]

This is untrue. I have never written about “African Canadians,” for starters, and have never framed Asian arguments about their role in Canada as “assaulting European civilization.”

They offer no evidence for these cited words because I have not written anything close to this claim. I have simply criticized some current Chinese leaders in Canada for their continual demands for apologies and financial compensation from current Canadians (who had nothing to do with the head tax), and have also written historically based articles challenging their interpretation of the origins and context of the head tax.

They continue:

“In claiming this, Mr. Duchesne ignores the historical fact that the “founding” of Canada took place on the land of indigenous peoples, and that in the name of “preserving European civilization” systemic exclusion and colonial domination has been inflicted on the First Peoples. It is hard to avoid reading Mr. Duchesne’s notion of “European civilization” and “Britishness” as something resembling white supremacy.”

How can the argument that Canada was founded by European Canadians be categorized as a form of “White supremacy” if Canada, was in fact created by Europeans?

As late as 1971 – when multiculturalism was officially introduced — the ethnic composition of the nation was 96% European, at which point all the institutions, legal system, educational curriculum, transformation of wilderness into productive farms, all the cities, the parliamentary traditions, the churches, the entire infrastructure of railways, ports, shipping industries, and highways, had been created by hardworking Europeans. This is not to say that other minorities were not participants; it is to emphasize the salient reality of Canada’s European culture.

Robson Street in Vancouver, BC — 50 years ago!

I have never endorsed any of the actions that were inflicted against indigenous peoples, or against any NON-White immigrant, but have simply tried to offer a view of Canada that does not stereo-typify Europeans as inherently “racist”, and other minorities as inherently “benevolent”.

Millions of current European Canadians are tired of having the history of their ancestors categorized solely by the words “systematic exclusion and colonial domination.” This is clearly a form of “racial caricature.”

“It matters not to individuals like Mr. Duchesne that Chinese people first landed on Canada’s west coast in 1744, came to pan for gold in 1858, and in 1881 were brought to Canada to help build the Canadian Pacific Railway. It appears immaterial to Mr. Duchesne that Chinese Canadians have a longstanding presence in Canada. Similarly, South Asians have made Canada their home since the turn of the last century.”

Everyone knows this. What they don’t know are facts such as the following:

From 1608 to 1760, immigration to New France (Quebec) consisted of only 10,000 settlers, and thereafter it was “almost non-existent.” The French-speaking population numbered about 70,000 in the 1760s, and thereafter, until the late 1800s, the population expanded rapidly through the high fertility rate of mothers, 5.6 surviving children on average, and not at all through immigration. By 1950, the Quebec population was almost 4 million. This increase was not a result of immigration, but of continuing high fertility rates. It was only in the 1970s that Montreal saw an increasing inflow of non-European immigrants.

But these three (Chinese/Asian) activists don’t highlight the struggles of Quebec mothers, (and) how hard it was for them to make a living in the harsh climate of Canada. Instead, they prefer to make a living by depicting Europeans in the worst possible light as “supremacists“, and then they have the nerve to complain about “racial caricatures”.

“[I]t is 2015 and one expects a more enlightened populace today — one that includes all peoples and rejects the portrayal of Canada as one preserved for “Europeans” only.”

My argument is not that Canada should be preserved for Europeans only; it is that the policy of multiculturalism encourages Canadians from all ethnic backgrounds to affirm their heritage and culture, and that if we are to be consistent and not follow a double standard,we should stop prohibitingEuropean Canadians from pursuing their ownethnic interests in the same way that these three (Chinese/Asian) activists have made entire careers pursuing the ethnic interests of Asians in Canada.

“Duchesne is a professor of history and sociology, but he has brought the academic profession into disrepute.”

There are no indications that these three (Chinese/Asian) activists know much about the history and sociology profession; whereas I have an extensive list of publications in both fields. The three of them combined — as far as I can tell from a search of the Internet — do not have a single referred publication.

“Mr. Duchesne’s intolerant statements will run the risk of inciting fear and resentment toward Canadians of Asian heritage by reinforcing stereotypes of the ethnic Chinese as perpetual foreigners. He glorifies scholarship and writing that fuels xenophobia and provides fodder for white supremacy. Mr. Duchesne is a unicultural ideologue.”

They have no evidence that I have reinforced stereotypes about Chinese Canadians; what is the case is that I don’t accept their demands for endless apologies and “inclusive redresses.”

Go, Nipp, and Ng are the ones who have fueled xenophobia through many years of activism againstEuropean Canadians, polarizing Canadians into the “bad”, “racist” Whites and the “innocent” minorities.

The Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada’s Statement on Academic Freedom (2011)…sets out the responsibilities of academic freedom, which include: evidence and truth must be the guiding principles…committed to the highest ethical standards in their teaching and research; faculty should examine data, question assumptions and be guided by evidence; and faculty and university leadership are obligated to ensure that students’ human rights are respected.

These 3 (Chinese/Asian) activists are welcome to take a look at my extensively reviewed book, The Uniqueness of Western Civilization, which cites over 800 different books and articles, and which even critics have praised for its very high academic standards. I am also a highly-liked professor at my university, with high levels of student registration in my courses. What the students like most about my classes is that they don’t get only the leftist view of things, but three or four viewpoints.

The textbook required for my Introduction to Sociology course, for example, is a typical radical-leftist text, in addition to which I offer students alternative readings with libertarian, old conservative, and European nationalist perspectives. I often say to students that they can follow any viewpoint; all that I require of them is to show awareness of alternative views, (and) take them into account in their writings.

I don’t object to the enthusiasm Go, Nipp, and Ng exhibit for Asianissues and historical contributions to Canada. It is natural that they care about their people. I object to the current double standard which says that only NON-Europeans have a moral right to protect and enhance their ethnic interests. I am for a level playing field in the Canadian multicultural arena, with European Canadians enjoying the same rights as other ethnic groups in the defense of their heritage and cultural lineage. It is that simple. >Source

In 100 years the White race will have NO NATIONS of its own. But every other race will have their original homelands. Just think about it.

[Proportion of NON-whites in CANADA, 1981-2001–Stats Canada] WHITE Canadians are seriously declining in direct proportion to INCREASING influxes of NON-whiteimmigrants and their progeny. The latest 2011 Census figures show over 19% were NON-white. For this year (2015), we can safely estimate a 21% proportion. That is an astounding increase from only 4.7% in 1981, yet Canada continues to import 5,000 new foreigners per week!

…con’t from above: No – wait a minute. I mean, all you folks who are not White to think about it. All you White folks … well, never mind. I didn’t mean to actually ask you to think about it. After all, that would require effort, and I wouldn’t want to interrupt you from watching your propagandizing television shows. And anyway, your cultures are hardly worth preserving anyway. If they were, you’d be fighting to save them now. Right, my Dutch, British and Canadian friends?? Quick – name me 5 multi-cultural countries.

I bet you did not name a single country in Africa, Greater Asia, the Middle East, South America, or Central America – did you. Every nation you named was in North America or Europe, (plus Australia & New Zealand) – was it not?

Nations that were founded and developed into the most desirable and successful societies in the world by White folk. And nations that were — until a few generations ago — inhabited mainly by White folk.

[Quiz: From a World Population of well over 7,000,000,000 people, guess the proportion of WHITE people? Now, for your ANSWER. Now that you know who the REAL racial minority is on this planet, perhaps it’s time to start questioning the “value” of so-called “employment equity” [affirmative action] employment policies in your own nations. Yes?]

…con’t from above: But not any more. Now they are ‘multicultural’ societies – the only societies on the face of the planet where the founding majority-race actually decided to commit cultural and demographic genocide on themselves. I know it’s hard to believe, but its true. Virtually all nations that were once culturally unique to White folks are now multi-hued tribal hodgepodges with no common understanding of their culture, heritage or future.

London, England is now LESS than 45% White!

It frightens me to contemplate that — in a few short generations — White folks like me will have no culturally unique societies to call their own. Whether you are a White Canadian, a White citizen of France, a White German, a White Swede, aWhite Estonian, a White Fin, a White Brit, a White person from the Netherlands or a White anyone. Not a single White person on this planet will be able to live in a nation that is culturally unique to them, and a country they call their very own.

But everyone else will. (For example, China, India, Pakistan, the Philippines, Nigeria, Kenya will still be inhabited by their own peoples; but not our fast-disappearing White nations!)

It’s a testament to the accomplishments of White folk, I guess. Everyone else wants to be where we are to bask in the glow of our success, drink from the fountains we have built and eat from the buffet tables we have set. And that’s OK. Generosity and sharing is what Christianity (the basis of all western White cultures) is all about.

But, in the process of sharing our wealth with the world, did we really have to give up our cultures, too? Did we have to sell-out all what our forefathers struggled for, fought for and believed in? Did we have to abandon our identity and our past in such a cavalier and unnecessary manner? No one put a gun to our heads. No one threatened us. We had a choice all along – we could have done what every generation in history has done, and required newcomers to our countries to bend to us. Instead, we decided to bend to them!

With no precedent to look to – no successful historical models to refer to – we decided that it would be a “good thing” if we, on purpose, allowed millions of foreigners into our countries, to form ethnically separate tribes within our borders and essentially ignore our own cultures.

With no proof that such action would have any positive results for our children, we White folks somehow decided that other cultures must be given “equal consideration and respect” within the borders of our own nations. My God, can anyone tell me what borders are for, if not to help people protect and preserve their own cultural identity and way of life? Why do we have any borders at all if our culture is so unworthy of defending?

We have become brainwashed — and me as well. Even as I wrote the preceding paragraph, I felt slightly “dirty” – like the comments were somehow “racist” or something. How on earth is it “racist” for a people to want to live their lives within a secure border, among people like them who share the same history and understanding of life?

And do you want to hear something sick and twisted? You know how White folks are constantly told that it is “racist” to prefer being around their own kind? Well, if you think about it, this preference is, in fact, the very basis for multiculturalism itself. We are told that folks from foreign cultures need to form their own communities so they can be with their own kind, have a sense of belonging and be happy. Get it? It’s “racist” if we do it to them — but perfectly acceptable if they do it to us.

Of course, aside from the sick and twisted, there’s also the sad and ironic. While multiculturalism allows foreigners into western societies and surround themselves with their own kind to the exclusion of all others, it also erodes the ability of the founding White race to enjoy the same privilege within their own nations. The more foreign cultures there are vying for space; the less space there is for the founding culture to enjoy and the more space the founding culture is forced to abandon to foreigners.

Even now, entire neighbourhoods and cities are being overrun by people whose main intention is to grow their foreign culture within their host nations and increase their influence and political power. Their communities are largely insular and separate from traditional White culture. And every square mile of land they occupy, is a square mile lost to White culture.

Maybe its poetic justice. Years ago, Whites colonized many of their nations by force, now they are colonizing ours by stealth through the back door with our permission.

Whatever the case, if you are White you should cherish the little bit of culture you have left here in the West. In 100 years, your White race will have no nations to call their own. They will likely not even have any nations that they control politically, what with the astronomical abortion rates and miniscule birthrates among Whites.

Like lemmings rushing towards the cliff edge, White folk are on a journey to oblivion. Voluntarily — and almost eagerly — they have taken steps to ensure that future generations of their kind are politically dis-empowered and culturally marginalized. They have implemented social policies that will surely relegate them to minority status in their own nations within this century. Eventually, they will be just another multiculti, minority voice crying out to have their interests known amongst dozens of other multiculti voices, each focused solely on their own needs. It is the natural outcome of this culturally fragmented, tribal society that we have willfully created.

For a brief shining moment, White people had it all. They were rulers of their lands and masters of their destiny. They lived safely together, immersed in a comfortable cocoon of cultural familiarity and belonging. They shared a common purpose and set of values with a common identity. THEY KNEW WHO THEY WERE.

Nowadays, Whites don’t know whothey are, wherethey are, wherethey are going nor wherethey’ll end up. And the saddest part is not that they don’t know – it’s that they don’t care. As such, they deserve whatever unpleasantness destiny typically delivers to such complacent, unappreciative dandies.

Wherever White people end up, though — I know one thing – there’ll be a lot of other people there who don’t look like them and don’t think like them. A lot of other people who share nothing with them in the way of cultural values. A lot of other people who have a drastically different idea about what their society should look like. And a lot of other people whose first priority will be to defend their own cultural interests and take care of their own. That is something White people sadly failed to do. >Source

I’ve been lurking on this site for 6 months and have, until now, not made any comments. Today, I felt compelled to share with you my “awakening”, and how SBPDL was a big part of it.

I live in NYC (New York City) and have been here for about a decade. When I first moved here, I was far from being a “racist”. I embraced the myth preached by the Left, that blacks are victims of “racist oppression”. I felt racism was bad, and being racist towards someone was the worst thing you could do. My parents, friends and most my family are liberal and non-racist.

In short, my current racism cannot be accounted for by the myth that racism is somehow a disease caught from being around racist people. I don’t know anyone who is “racist”. The old myth that racists are just “ignorant” also does not apply to me. I am well-educated and graduated from a liberal arts college.

The bigger point is that … despite life-long indoctrination … none of it could withstand the power of my first-hand experiences with diversity. It was my day to day experiences that gradually eased me towards the truth. And I have never even had one of those eye-opening moments that some folks have … like being mugged. Rather, it was just a slowly simmering pot that took ten years to come to a rolling boil.

Over the summer I was taking a trip to Utah. I was at JFK airport waiting for my flight. Something had just happened … I forget what … but it was some “diversity” experience that left me feeling annoyed. At this point, 6 months ago, I was still not racist because racists are the worst humans alive. But I did notice I was becoming more and more annoyed by black people. I didn’t hate them or anything, it was just a low-grade irritation whenever I was around them. So I am at JFK and I pull out my laptop, and just for my own amusement, I google “why are black people so annoying?”. Guess which website came up first?

That’s right … SBPDL. So I click the link, not sure what to expect and all I can say is that I spent the next three hours transfixed. I read article after article, and page after page of comments. I read all the way to Minneapolis and kept reading as I waited for my connecting flight to Salt Lake.

An hour later, it was time to board and as I put my laptop away, my head was spinning. I stood there realizing a feeling that had been lurking deep in the recesses of my consciousness for a while: that I really do not like black people, they are a blight on society, and I wish they would go away. It was a scary truth that was just too terrifying to admit to myself. But seeing all the articles and comments from this website, I realized that there are others just like me. I can’t emphasize, after being an anti-racist for so many years, how staggering a realization this was.

I get on the plane. As people are finishing boarding I’m looking around, and realize that I am feeling as if a tremendous weight has been lifted from me. Like the feeling of taking off a heavy backpack. I felt content and relaxed, which was something I, as a New Yorker, had not felt for a while. And as I’m looking around, I slowly recognize that every person on the flight– save a few Hispanics– was White. For the first time in a long while, I was amongst “my people”. It was such a tremendous relief.

This feeling lasted through my flight and my weekend in Salt Lake, where I saw little (racial) diversity. And sure enough, once I got back to NYC, the old feeling of low-grade annoyance and tension crept back in. It was tough to come back.

But the good news is … that experience pushed me over the edge and I have started making plans to move back to Utah this summer. I can hardly wait and I know life will be much better there, even though it means leaving a high-paying job in NYC.

My final thought to share is: thank you all. All your comments, the rants, the jokes, they all had a huge impact on my life. Your posts here make a difference, please never forget that no matter how bad things get.

Thanks for reading. I’ll post the first of my “Adventures in Diversity” stories soon. >Source

“American Negroes have a low-impulse control center, have poor future-time orientation abilities, and on average, suffer from a lower IQ amounting to one standard deviation (15 points) less than White people.”

At the same time, it introduced new rules requiring sponsors to take greater financial responsibility for parents or grandparents who immigrate to Canada. While these changes represent a significant improvement over what had been in place, they still come at a massive cost to the public purse.

By 2011, a backlog of more than 160,000 sponsored parents and grandparents was waiting to enter Canada.

At existing admission rates, most would have waited years before being allowed to come here.
The program is so popular, in fact, — it was estimated the queue could reach half-a-million (500,000 FOREIGN elders!) by 2020 with a wait time of 15 years before entering Canada. Sponsors were, not surprisingly, frustrated with the delays.(ALL EURO-White nations are under siege from NON-white immigrants)

In stating this, however, it should also be noted that the government and the public in general are increasingly concerned about the cost of the program to taxpayers. Since the incomes and taxes paid by sponsored senior immigrants are very small, it has been estimated that, during the lifetime of these senior newcomers in Canada, taxpayers must support the health care and social transfer costs (OAS and GIS, etc.) of at least … $300,000 (each).

[ELN Editor’s Note: Sponsored Elderly Foreigners are very unlikely to contribute anything to our economy. But, just who are these elderly foreigners that benefit from our foolish altruism, and from what nations do these people hail from? Just one example is found in this video.

CBC television journalist Ian Hanomansing

Also, note the the CBC preference in highlighting visible-minorities and women in their employment roster. Despite Canada’s high unemployment rate, it’s just another job that WHITE Canadian guys “refuse to do”, thanks to Canada’s racist employment-equity (affirmative action) laws.

Second Logo (1958-1974)

White males were exclusively responsible in establishing the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) and who are about 40% of Canada’s population, yet White males are woefully unrepresented on the small screen of television news and programs. In fact, White males are relentlessly insulted, denigrated and diminished in status as seen in television commercials.

In consequence, just eliminating the backlog will come at a high price. With the admission of 25,000 immigrant parents and grandparents last year, (plus) an equal number this year, plus another 20,000 (old foreigners)next year, the bill amounts to an estimated $21 Billion ($21,000,000,000) – more than half of which comes in estimated costs for health care. If all those in the backlog are allowed in, the total cost could be twice as high.

To prevent such a backlog from developing in the future, the government will place an annual cap on new applications – which for 2014 will be set at 5,000 and which is expected to involve 9,000 individuals when accompanying dependents are included. While new requirements will be in place that are designed to do a better job of ensuring that sponsors will live up to their commitments to support their parents and grandparents, most of the health care benefits and social transfers will still be available to them, and within a few years the cost to taxpayers could, again … be in the tens of Billions of dollar$.

In the circumstances — given the continuing generosity of the system — we (CANADIANS) may well have to expect pressure to increase the numbers admitted … so more sponsored (FOREIGN) PARENTS and GRANDPARENTS can benefit. By the same token, taxpayers may object to the high cost, and demand that sponsors pay for all the costs of their elderly relatives. In the meantime, the government will shell out a very large slice of taxpayers’ money to assuage sponsors with parents and grandparents in the backlog. Not that opposition parties would be less generous.

Olivia Chow, former New Democratic (NDP) member of Parliament for Trinity—Spadina, TORONTO

Olivia Chow (Hong Kong-born Immigrant) of the NDP [UPDATE: Chow was a candidate to become Toronto’s mayor in 2014 -she lost!] has made it very clear that she is strongly in favour of such sponsorships, while Liberal leader Justin Trudeau has declared that if he becomes prime minister, he will reverse the changes the Conservative (political party) have made, and make it easier for such (FOREIGN) seniors to come to Canada.

Canadians remain positively disposed toward immigrants in general. A recent Forum Research poll indicates they support the admission of an immigrant’s spouse and dependent children by a margin of almost six to one.

This welcoming attitude, however, does not extend to bringing in (foreign) parents and grandparents, where Canadians are opposed by a margin of two and a half to one – very likely because of the huge cost to taxpayers, and particularly the pressure on the health care system.

Although the government has made a major effort to bring some semblance of order to the system, the debate over how many sponsored senior immigrants should be allowed to come to Canada, and at whose expense, is clearly not over. >Immigration Reform

>Martin Collacott served as high commissioner to Sri Lanka, and ambassador to Syria, Lebanon and Cambodia. His recent study, Canadian Family Class Immigration: The Parent and Grandparent Program Under Review, was published by the Fraser Institute and is available at http://www.fraserinstitute.org — He lives in Vancouver.

Remember when? German immigrants at Quebec City, Canada about 100 years ago. No free welfare money, No free medical care, No subsidized housing. Immigrants went immediately to work, or they went hungry.

LATVIA Celebrates Independence Day With Massive Torch-Lit Parade and Rally

We constantly hear the left-wing chant that “diversity is our strength.” This is a standing insult against all White people. They claim that White homogeneous nations are weak and undesirable (without the “joys of diversity”).

Look at the recent November 18th celebration of Latvian Independence Day at the Freedom memorial in Riga. This is exactly the kind of population group that is being explicitly denigrated by liberal mantras on “diversity and multiculturalism“. LOOK … No Racial Diversity!!

************************************************************* In neighboring Estonia, look how “miserable” all these people are living in a country where everyone looks the same and shares the same culture. Also read/view: One Proud European Nation

[ELN Editor’s Note: Latvia’s population of just 2 million people, and Estonia’s population of only 1.3 million are tiny examples of homogeneity when compared with other homogeneous nations such as Nigeria169 Million, or India1300 million people, or China1361 million people (probably 1500+ million). Unlike traditional White countries these NON-white nations are in no danger of losing their national identity due to the mass migration of incompatible races moving into their countries.

It’s White countries — and ONLY White countries — that are inflicted with this disease called “multiculturalism“, and it’s WhiteEuropeans representing a mere 8% of the world’s population who are doomed to extinction as a sub-species, UNLESS we become determined “population environmentalists“ willing to throw off the mental shackles of “political correctness“, “white guilt”, “racism”, etc. and begin speaking out in favour of our own race.

Enforced multi-culturalism/multi-racialism is an artificial stratagem designed to attack White nations at the very core of their racial heritage, and thus DESTROY the host nation … nothing more!]

Blog Stats

TODAY’S Featured Posts

Archives

Most Popular

Type ANY Word

Search for:

Categories

United Nations, Human Rights Charter, Article 19 states: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

[Most people] “confuse the dreary recitation of politically correct gibberish with sensitivity that they think they have arrived at through their own value clarification”. –Tomislav Sunic

"Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me TRUTH." — Henry David Thoreau
"Happiness is not the goal of existence, but the byproduct of a life well lived and the purpose of life is TRUTH... not pleasure".
"For most people, the desire not to deviate too far from the herd, prevents them from telling the truth they really feel inside. What would the neighbors think?" -- John Kaminski

Current Weather

~~~~~ ELLIOT LAKE NEWS & VIEWS is a Blog helping to slay the hydra-headed dragon of "political correctness" with the effective weapon called TRUTH.
Subjects pertaining to mass 3rd-world immigration, multi-culturalism and racial identity are are given special priorities here, and from which material you may either accept or reject at your personal discretion.
Opinions are accepted without ad hominem attacks or insults. Personal responses to any commentary or questions will be kept to a bare minimum due to time constraints.

Miscellaneous

> All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 -1860)
The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear.
“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” -Orwell
To get the oil price, please enable Javascript.