"Lord Robertson, a self-confessed Freemasonic member of Edinburgh's sinister "Speculative Society" lodge, who enjoyed a peculiarly close personal relationship with Thomas Hamilton, the mass murderer of abused children in Dunblane, failed to sue the Sunday Herald for libel and promptly disappeared from public life. Police records revealed that Robertson had helped expedite the process by which the Manchurian Candidate, Hamilton, already a convicted child molester with known affiliations to the British elite, was able to obtain gun licenses.

Roberston worked in collusion with Michael Forsyth (Secretary of State for Scotland), a fellow "Speculative Freemason" and Robert Bell, an associate of Malcolm Rifkind (British Foreign Secretary). Robertson, at the behest of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, had a vested interest in 'wasting' children who were beginning to talk.

On 13 March 1996, Thomas Hamilton, a former Boy Scout leader walked into Dunblane Primary School armed with two 9 mm pistols and two .357 Magnum revolvers. He killed sixteen small children and a teacher. The subsequent police investigation revealed that Hamilton had loaded the magazines for his Browning with an alternating combination of fully metal-jacketed and hollow point ammunition. This horrific event led to the banning of handguns in the UK. [How convenient.]

The Judge who conducted the inquiry into the atrocity, during which two teachers claimed to have seen another mysterious man "guiding" Hamilton onto the premises, was Lord Cullen. Cullen, also a member of the Freemasonic Speculative Society and an associate of Labour "Scottish Mafia" figures such as Lord Robertson, Tony Blair, John Reid and Gordon Brown, was accused by leading journalists and emergency service personnel of having achieved a cover-up.

Cullen Report condemned as a 'whitewash'

According to journalist Marcello Mega, in The News of the World, 28 December 2003:

1. A top Scottish Freemason, Former Grand Master Lord Burton, has said that Lord Cullen's inquiry into the Dunblane massacre was a cover-up.

2. These high-profile legal figures may belong to a secretive 'Super-Mason' group called The Speculative Society.

Lord Burton said: "I have learned of an apparent connection between prominent members of the legal establishment involved in the inquiry, and the secretive Speculative Society. The society was formed in Edinburgh University through Masonic connections so I accept that there might be a link by that route." Reportedly, members of the Speculative Society have included Lord Cullen and a number of other judges, sheriffs and advocates.

3. Some of these high-profile people had links to the Queen Victoria School 'where gunman Thomas Hamilton was allowed to roam free before the 1996 atrocity'.

4. Reportedly the police are investigating claims that pupils at Queen Victoria School were regularly taken away and sexually abused.

5. Former housemaster Glenn Harrison told the News of the World how he even found Hamilton, 43, creeping around the dormitories at night. He said Hamilton had close links to a top policeman. Glenn was never called to give evidence at the Cullen Inquiry.

6. Lord Burton said: "I tried repeatedly to raise concerns about the inquiry during my time in the Lords, and I was bullied and threatened by powerful peers loyal to the Conservative Government of the day, who warned me of dire consequences if I continued to embarrass them." ( According to this source Cached - 'Malcolm Rifkind's friend and his then Chairman of his constituency party at Edinburgh Pentlands, Robert Bell, according to the front page lead of the Edinburgh Evening News on 23 March 1996, sold guns and ammunition to Thomas Hamilton only a few weeks before the Dunblane massacre, and it was reported he said he would sell him guns again.')

8. Glenn Harrison had kept dozens of files from pupils alleging bullying and abuse while he was at the Queen Victoria School and wrote to parents warning of the dangers in 1991. It led to him being ousted from the school and just days before he left, police raided his home and confiscated the files.

9. Glenn states that Hamilton had been a friend of Ben Philip, the senior housemaster at QVS. Mr Philip died in December 1993, aged 46, when he fell from a ladder while hanging decorations."

Posted by Douglas Sea on 06/19/2015"This latest shooting in South Carolina smacks of the Colorado theater shooting where we saw live interviews of witnesses who had been in the theater at the time and witnessed at least one other individual involved and then the police immediately say that there was only one responsible....interesting how this guy looks very similar...the obvious question is who benefits? how does someone shoot so many so quickly and accurately? Instantly the media is trying to make it a racial issue....I'm sure that Sharpton will be down there very shortly with a group marching in circles...I still have faith that they won't be able to gin up actual race riots per se. It's obvious that's what they desperately want.. and this 1984 hate crime business...a crime is a crime whether there is "love" or "hate" invovled...hmmm as far as "love" crime isn't crime of passion used as a defense to lessen the severity of the punishment? so if "hate" is involved is a worse crime?"

Here's an interesting video on "gun control" which is more accurately victim disarmament: You have received a YouTube video! Aaron Zelman of jpfo was one of my guests on my radio program at shepherd...he's since past away...

Jill Dando is an interesting one that has unfolded a lot more in recent years, but along with Dunblane I wouldn't call them False Flag attacks, just cover-ups. The distinction being that psychological warfare is not the primary motive, the killing is, and the obfuscation comes after.

The one I really struggle with is the McCanns. There is so much available information to incriminate the parents I get the feeling the whole thing is a massive psyop. It's like they're trying to look guilty

Jun 20, 2015 4:56:03 GMT thesekininja said:Jill Dando is an interesting one that has unfolded a lot more in recent years, but along with Dunblane I wouldn't call them False Flag attacks, just cover-ups. The distinction being that psychological warfare is not the primary motive, the killing is, and the obfuscation comes after.

You're right about Jill Dando, but Dunblane was a false flag operation (albeit with real deaths) designed to change gun laws in the UK.

The McCanns are definitely being protected, and most certainly killed their child, accidentally or not. They are clearly linked to establishment paedophile rings.

Yes, Dunblane was definitely a successful false flag, which succeeded in taking away our guns in the UK.

As for the McCann's; I have no doubt regarding their guilt, or the fact that they were in a pedo-ring. A couple who had holidayed with them and another mutual couple were disgusted when they overheard Gerry McCann talking about his desires to sexually abuse his own daughter.

Unfortunately, they know people in the UK establishment who protected them; they probably hold evil pedo-parties together. The first thing they did when she 'went missing' was call Sky News, and their friends in Government, including the minister Des Browne, who then apparently contacted Gordon Brown. The poor Portuguese never stood a chance, because the UK government, and the Leicestershire police covered up for the McCann's and made life very difficult for the Portuguese authorities.

Poor Jill Dando was murdered, just like Veronica Guerin and Matthew Harding, because they had uncovered the massive establishment pedofile ring, which also runs deeply in the evil BBC.

The first thing that Charlie Hebdo magazine did was exactly the same....

"....oh, so some terrorists just massacred half of our staff and wanted to kill us too....let's just forgive them....sing Kumbaya together...and hug all the world's leaders who came to Paris to show what big hearts they really have....oh my...such a relief that the world community is such a strong family and that the world is in such good hands. Remember to Loooooveee!!! (love the government, love the media,...)"

Been so numb to this shit for so long that it's been a while since something has made me genuinely angry (other than everything about MS, see screen name :-). However, at 4:30 in this video DITRH makes a damn good case that the super bowl singing Sandy Hoax kids are the real 10 to 12 year old kids who were supposed to have been killed in 2012 and that the pictures we saw were from around 2006 or 2007 when they were ages 5-7. Aside from all the evil deeds it's almost more infuriating that they would put forth the effort to be dirty, it's like they are rubbing our faces in it...

Caught red handed, fake “concerned” citizens ALL happen to be social media experts and media marketing students / teachers? Also, one full blown actor from Lucasfilm?!

The social media “experts” are about to learn the REAL social media lesson.. let’s teach them.. starting with the Doctoral TEACHER who is pretending to be a peppy “citizen”… meanwhile she lists her specialty as “persuasion + social media”.

Dr. Lauren Auverset teaching social media and communication at the University of Alabama, formerly doing Public relations at University of Louisiana at Lafayette:

Linkedin

Next we have social media expert and marketer, former US Marine, and also former Dubai Saudi Arabia oil company affiliate named Nathan Justice.

Turns out he was ALSO a Public Relations specialist / student from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette!

Linkedin

Next we have social media expert and marketer, as well as National Diversity Council social media manager, and also former Louisiana State University student / intern.. Erin Boyd:

www.linkedin.com/pub/erin-boyd/67/82/801

Finally we have a full blown actor from Lucasfilm, Named “Donal O’meadhra (donald with no D at the end).

Lists himself as on X-files and TopGear… lists himself as currently working for Lucasfilm ..pictures of him with Doctor Who from the BBC.

I love videos by RedsilverJ. He thinks everything is a hoax (so do I) but he delivers his message in a hilarious way. We need a little comic relief every now and then, because the situation in the world is beyond depressing!

Many more on his channel. He rips on all the crisis actors, and is also not fooled by the whole fabricated race war here in the US.

Posted by lizardking on 08/25/2015The complete article can be found here:

news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090407/ap_on_re_us/binghamton_shootings

BINGHAMTON, N.Y. – The man who gunned down 13 people in an immigrant center thought police had harassed him for years, even spreading rumors about him and touching him in his sleep, and apparently was intent on killing people before returning "to the dust of the earth," according to a rambling letter in broken English mailed to a TV station the day of the massacre.

The letter's authenticity could not immediately be verified Monday, but the city of Binghamton said it was reviewing the material as "evidence in the investigation." The letter was mailed to News 10 Now, in Syracuse, and postmarked Friday, the day Vietnamese immigrant Jiverly Wong stormed into the American Civic Association and went on a rampage before killing himself.

"I am Jiverly Wong Shooting the people," the letter begins.

The letter was dated March 18, more than two weeks before the shooting. It included photos of Wong smiling with two guns, a gun permit and his driver's license. The envelope carried three stamps: two Purple Hearts and a Liberty Bell.

The letter ends with him saying he can't "accept my poor life," that he is taking on the job of a judge and will "cut my poor life." He writes "at least two people with me go to return to the dust of the earth."

Police speculated Wong, who was ethnically Chinese but was from Vietnam, was angry over losing a job and frustrated about his poor English skills.

"I am sorry I know a little English," the letter reads.

It indicates a delusional man obsessed with unidentified police he says taunted him and tortured him, even going into his room, watching him sleep and touching him while he slept. The letter says police stole money from his wallet and stopped their cars in front of him 32 times in efforts to make him crash into them.

"I never hit the car," the letter states.

In a statement, the city of Binghamton, which is about 140 miles northwest of New York City, said it was reviewing the letter but would release no further comment about it until a press briefing scheduled for Tuesday.

Police Chief Joseph Zikuski told the TV station police would be asking mental health professionals to analyze the letter. He said behavioral experts from the FBI suggested "something like this might happen."

"It's not a complete surprise to us whatsoever," he said.

News 10 Now said it received the letter Monday.

In staccato bursts, the letter writer strings together a tale of police harassment following him from California to New York.

"Many time from 1990 to 1997 at the day time ... cop exploit unknow English and went to my house knock the door for harass and domineer," it reads. "Of course during that time cop coined something was not true about me and spread a rumour nasty like the California cop."

Wong, 41, spent several years in California, where in 1992 he was arrested on a bad-check charge. It was in California, where he drove a truck, that he divorced his wife, Xiu Ping Jiang, in 2006. He returned to Binghamton the next year.

The writer expresses frustration over losing his job at a vacuum manufacturer.

"Right now I still get unemploment benefit of the company Shop Vac Endicott," he says. "New York State Department of Labor was cheat and unpaid from December 1st 2008 to December 28th 2008 I already claim weekly benefit from that date."

The letter contained photos of Wong sitting in what looks like an institutional kitchen. In one, he points a gun toward the ceiling. In another, he sits at a table holding a cup, two guns resting within inches of his left elbow. In a third, he stands in front of a kitchen island bar, bar stools behind him and his arms folded defiantly across his chest, a gun in each hand.

The package mailed to the TV station included Wong's pistol permit, which describes him as 5-foot-8 and 135 pounds. It lists six guns, four of which are crossed out: two Ruger .45-calibers, a Glock 9 mm and a Springfield 9 mm. Two Berettas are not crossed out: a 9 mm and a .45-caliber. Police say Wong used a 9 mm and a .45-caliber in the shootings.

The letter rambles disjointedly.

"Let talk about when I live in California," it reads. "Such as...cop used 24 hours the technique of ultramodern and camera for burn the chemical in my house. For switch the channel time ... For adjust the fan. For made me unbreathable. For made me vomit. For connect the music into my ear."

There are passages of pure politeness: "Please continue second page thank you," the writer instructs.

But the letter ends with dark foreboding.

"Any way I can not accepted my poor life. Before I cut my poor life I must oneself get a judge job for make an impartial with undercover cop by at least two people with me go to return to the dust of earth.

"Already impartial now..cop bring about this shooting. cop must responsible."

The letter, neatly written in capital letters, ends with: "And you have a nice day."

Doesn't surprise me at all. Unfortunately in this case we won't see any big "alternative media" question what really happened. This is meant to divide the country even more. How can anybody NOT see this???

Yeah, interesting video. Listen to the supposed boyfriend saying, "she was a storyteller by profession." Finally a little truth near the end there.

Outlandish they would expect us to believe that within hours of the shooting a scholarship had already been set up and the father had already had a chat with the Governor of Virginia about increasing gun control.

And obviously the father hadn't been "crying his eyes out all day." He was perfectly composed and his face bore no evidence of emotion.

I think at this point, the press having been outed as untrustworthy to the max and a total tool of the state, that ANY news story needs to be independently verified before becoming accepted as truth at even the basest level. Did we see anybody get killed? No. Show us the bodies.

Posted by natavism on 08/29/2015Just a few more images to add from the WDBJ hoax - this one was really sloppy. The cell phone footage of the event clearly shows the hand of a white man holding the gun, and you guessed it - the "shooter" was black. Some media outlets are using a clearly photoshopped image with a very sharp and clear chubby black hand - this is allegedly from a cell phone video, which is clearly bullshit. They also claim the cameraman's camera swung around and caught the culprit - which is true - they caught that same white man on camera and then added a photoshopped version to media sites, knowing that very few would go through the footage frame by frame or at all. Links to my pics:

Video here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_gYyVXMF88) with a few more good points - especially the timestamp on the full sized version of the photoshopped figure pic which I don't have atm.

Some more advanced things -Other tasties include a shot of the same tree that heavily features in the sandy hook hoax (it's in the studio footage - a tree featured in the panning over the town shot toward the beginning)And there was a great post on the /r/conspiracy subreddit (one great post out of maybe the 4000 on this topic mind you, that place is awful now a days) that explained the event from an occult perspective - the poster mentioned that the two vantage points we have of the shooting work somehow to come together to form a reality - it's kind of hegelian - I don't think I can explain it much better than that - I'll have to do some more research I suppose.

My friend pointed out that in the POV video, around the 0:16 mark, when the cameraman is facing away from the scene, you can actually see the anchorwoman turn her head and look at the shooter for a brief split second, then turn and face the interviewee again like nothing ever happened. I watched the video frame-by-frame, myself, and, what do you know, it's plain as day. It happened. Go look.What's crazy is that there's absolutely no reason in the world for her to have committed that action except for the specific purpose of leaving a little hint that the event was faked. It made me think, even in the live footage, there's no fucking reason in the world for the cameraman to just be aimlessly filming the water when there's a live interview taking place right next to him. It's like the only explanation for him even filming that way is to conceal the shooter on the video and explain why nobody saw him.

Here's something deeper for those of you who aren't sleeping. I was thinking how freakin' crazy it is that not only did the shooting take place on live TV, but the shooter also came out with his own first-person video of the event, on top of that. I realized: the two separate videos of the event are a clear occult calling card. The live news is the object version and the POV is the subject version. It's a reference to the coalescence of subject and object, or the opening of the third eye, or illumination. There's a lot more to it, but I'll let you guys figure it out depending on where your heads are.

This is something I've thought about quite a bit - I believe there are usually loose threads built into these sorts of things - I take it others here can see it too. Why? Because this is more divide and conquer. People are automatically divided by their ability to detect these things and the two groups that are created have very little chance at understanding one another, because they look at the event and reach completely different conclusions. It's the dialectic on steroids - these events act like giant axe wedges that very effectively divide people by opinion.

Aug 28, 2015 23:20:41 GMT seeker said:I think at this point, the press having been outed as untrustworthy to the max and a total tool of the state, that ANY news story needs to be independently verified before becoming accepted as truth at even the basest level. Did we see anybody get killed? No. Show us the bodies.

Propaganda is a weapon. I always love how they get the actors up there and they so easily forgive the murderers. If someone in my immediate family was murdered, the absolute LAST thing on my mind would be to give a freaking press interview for TV and I damn sure wouldn't be smiling like some of these crisis actors have done in the past (Foley siblings, duping delight much?).

I can hear the producer saying, "Can you act a little more sad in the next take when you forgive the killer? OK, that was great! We'll mail your check out tomorrow."

1. Why did numerous ear-witnesses say at least one attacker was firing a fully-automatic weapon?

2. Why did police concentrate on setting up a perimeter at the same time dispatch (via phone) is hearing the sound of gunshots within the school?

3. Why did it take police so long to enter the school, and why did it take almost three hours for them to reach the library, the area where the shooters were last seen? Who gave the orders not to go in?

4. Why did over 100 eye- and ear- witnesses dispute the official theory of only two shooters? Why did over 40 of those witnesses identify other participants BY NAME?

5. If the two shooters committed suicide shortly after noon, as police claim, how come at least 35 witnesses saw or heard suspects/gunshots/explosions after that time?

6. Why are there conflicting eyewitness accounts on the place and manner in which at least four of the dead victims were killed? Were victims being moved around? Was the crime scene being rearranged?

7. If left-handed Klebold shot himself in the left temple, why was his suicide weapon found clutched in his right hand?

8. How did students manage to keep seriously wounded teacher Dave Sanders alive for more than three hours while awaiting rescue, yet he was dead within 20 minutes of the police taking control of him? His corpse was later found with his shirt off. Is that first-aid? Or a sure-fire way of sending someone into shock?

9. What was the motive? Why would two teens who were not bullied, did not hate everyone, and were not psychopathic suddenly decide to destroy the lives of a dozen fellow students and themselves just six weeks before graduation?

10. Why would Harris and Klebold plan for a suicide mission and at the same time make normal plans for a post 4-20 future? Like seeking help on an English class essay from a teacher a few days before the attack, like making a date to see a movie the day after, like putting in a work schedule for the next week, like going to an out-of-town college with your dad to pick out a dorm room, like making plans to visit your old friends in New York.

11. Where is the gun shot residue (GSR) test evidence for Harris and Klebold and the other suspects?

12. Why was fingerprint evidence for Harris and Klebold not found on all but two of the hundreds of obects gathered at the scene? Whose fingerprints, if any, were found on the weapons seized?

13. Why does the official story claim, without a shred of evidence, that it was Harris and Klebold that set the South Wadsworth diversionary bomb (an incendiary device that exploded a couple of miles away from the school minutes before the shooting started)?

14. Why did authorities claim the two shotguns seized had no serial numbers when later documents clearly show they did have serial numbers? Why did they not try to find out who sold Harris and Klebold the Hi-Point 9mm rifle and the pump-action shotgun that were used in the shooting?

15. Were the school administrators warned, as rumored? Who was Principle Frank DeAngelis looking for, as reported by one student who saw him running up and down the interior cafeteria stairs right before the shooting broke out?

16. Why did a science teacher tell his students that they had been expecting a fire drill? Was a bomb found in a trash can on 4-19, as one source indicated? Were bomb threats phoned into the school on the morning of 4-20, as two others claimed?

17. Why didn’t the Final Report conclude that shooters entered Science rooms 1 and 8, when numerous shell casings were taken from these areas?

18. Why didn’t the Final Report mention the brief exit of a shooter on the east side, according to many eyewitnesses?

19. If the person seen on the roof of the school was a repairman, as police claim, why do witnesses say he was holding a weapon? Were shell casings found there, as some said?

20. Who scheduled ‘crisis training’ drills at Columbine High School (CHS) in the weeks before and what was the exact nature of this training?

21. What was a Denver police officer and a Jefferson County sheriff doing at Columbine High Shcool that morning before the shooting started?

22. What does reputed video evidence from the library and admin office areas show? Why does local media refuse to release on-scene video footage from the first half-hour of the incident?

23. What happened to all the evidence taken from the computers of the trenchcoat mafia gang?

24. Where are dozens of missing interviews of students, especially those in the science hall? Why are there still thousands of pages of investgatory materials that have never been made public, including hundreds of reports of non-Columbine witnesses and tipsters?

25. Why has the school district’s own report on the shooting, which included the extensive disciplinary records of the trenchcoat mafia associates, not been made public?

26. Did investigators even try to interview Harris’ psychologist, the man perhaps best positioned to know his mental state at the time?

27. Why did investigators show a remarkable lack of curiousity about connections with numerous similar school violence-related incidents occuring around the same time in the metro-Denver area and around the country?

28. Why did LAPD and Los Angeles Sheriff’s Office personnel travel to the scene afterwards? What was the subject of a 10-minute phone call made by the NYPD to the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office on 4-20?

29. Who invited the FBI and the ATF to the scene?

30. Why was the US Attorney’s Office (federal) consulted on ‘prosecutive decisions’ for this local crime?

31. Why was all but one of the seven ‘investigatory’ teams headed or co-headed by an FBI man? (the one exception was a team headed by a CBI(Colorado Bureau of Investigation) man, who was himself ‘ex’-FBI) Was the entire crime scene ‘federalized’ soon after the shooting started, under powers granted by the ‘Anti-terrorism Act’ (”for the protection of the people and the state”) signed by President Clinton exactly three years before- on April 20, 1996?

32. Why did FBI special agent Dwayne Fusilier not recuse himself from the investigation, as his son helped make a Columbine school video two years before that eerily mimicked the shooting?

33. What were two high-ranking military figures (a colonel and a general) in cami uniforms doing at the scene? Why was a memorial service at a public park afterwards ringed by military trucks? Who authorized a flyover by military jets and why?

These scripted shooting events are just a crash course in the dialectic, which is just how Rome used to do it. Give the people two extremes to choose from to create the desired synthesis.I'm sure I'm not telling anyone anything new around here, just want it to be clear. It also looks like the FCC has leveraged some kind of bizarre fine against the station, perhaps to force their cooperation?

An anonymous source sent me a bit of a news tip a little while ago and I thought you might like to see it.

Seems like the FCC, for some strange reason, dug up an old 3 second video image aired by WDJB back on July 12th of 2012, in order to file the largest possible fine against the station in late March of this year. They quietly announced the record-setting fine, $325,000, on their website on March 23rd, 2015… nearly 3 years after the incident.

On July the 1st of this year, WDBJ-TV Roanoke filed a motion to have the fine reduced or dismissed altogether based on the fact that the accident wasn’t intentional. I don’t know if that appeal has been ruled on as of yet.

According to the FCC, they have only filed two such fines against media companies previously. One was settled for $15,000 and the other for $37,000. The $325,000 fine is immense by comparison.

The question is: why?

I made the mistake of breaking one of my own rules last week on this topic - I posted about how bullshit this story was on my personal facebook because I had so many "friends" expressing sadness and despair over the events. Something along the lines of, "It's ok guys, this is obviously fake, look at the footage" followed by pics and video insisting no blood or gore or anything. Of course they all basically turned and shit on the "conspiracy theorist" and refused to look at my evidence - but this is nothing new. Do any of you have any experience or maybe some tips for that sort of thing? Obviously posting a link to /r/RomeRules isn't really going to get through to anyone, and apparently neither will posting primary sources that indicate hoax - which is what I did. If anyone has tips for me or similar stories to share, feel free to message or e-mail w.nat.farris@gmail.com if flooding the thread is frowned upon.