On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 04:48:48PM -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>
> Well, I think a solution involving a "deltas" directory that contained
> all deltas with a TO-REVISION in that version would be faster, more
> flexible, smaller and more straightforward.
[...]
> It would be more straightforward, because it wouldn't introduce unwanted
> patchlogs, it wouldn't introduce new kinds of branches that were
> inaccessible. It also wouldn't break the expectation that "if a
> revision exists, the namespace-previous revision also exists".
+1 on avoiding introduction of book-keeping branches and patchlogs and
not breaking current invariants of the namespace
--
-- ddaa