It's beautiful, how subtly (well not quite "subtle," actually, more deceptive) this serves to poison the well before the anti even begins his or her argument. Many threads started by WNs, demanding an anti response, abandon any other form of argument, and simply say something like "Why do you want to destroy the white race?" "Why do you hate the white race?" "Why do you support the genocide of the white race?" etc. etc.

How can anyone trust the arguments presented by people with such evil goals? No one can, of course. The antis have been defeated by their own evil machinations!

Except that's all poppycock and hogwash of the highest order.

Granted, there are a few, a very few, radical rabbis, or black supremacists and the like, who do actively hate the white race, many who want to destroy it. But they rarely come here, they don't represent mainstream America, and they certainly don't represent the typical anti-racist.

Hold up now!-you cry out, no doubt spilling what you were drinking in this outburst-antis are in the pockets of jews and communists, who dowant to destroy the white race! Aha! We just expose this to antis to make them think!

Except all that stuff about jews and communists? Also poppycock (the jury is out on whether or not it's hogwash, since jews can't eat pork).

THere is no gosh darn freakin jewish conspiracy to destroy the white race. You are insaneif you honestly think that an entire ethnic group could possibly work together out of nothing but inherent malice so that they can destroy the white race and control the world. Humans do not work that way. Neither are all jews malicious; that's another completely bonkers thing to believe.

Many communists, on the other hand, do want to control the world. But race has nothing to do with it. They want to crush all forms of individuality, expression, and free-thought in order to make this goal easier. Destroying any race, far less the White Race is not a part of their goal.

This word clearly has a high value in an appeal to emotion, and I suspect that's why so many of you throw it around all the time, despite the overwhelming majority of antis not supporting anything like genocide.

It's beautiful, how subtly (well not quite "subtle," actually, more deceptive) this serves to poison the well before the anti even begins his or her argument. Many threads started by WNs, demanding an anti response, abandon any other form of argument, and simply say something like "Why do you want to destroy the white race?" "Why do you hate the white race?" "Why do you support the genocide of the white race?" etc. etc.

How can anyone trust the arguments presented by people with such evil goals? No one can, of course. The antis have been defeated by their own evil machinations!

Except that's all poppycock and hogwash of the highest order.

Granted, there are a few, a very few, radical rabbis, or black supremacists and the like, who do actively hate the white race, many who want to destroy it. But they rarely come here, they don't represent mainstream America, and they certainly don't represent the typical anti-racist.

This argument holds true in many ways. As you noted there are some extremists among our opposition that boldly state their genocidal intentions. But others, the sheep, they too can be seen as genocidal as well, as many come here stating how they envision a world where we will be all one-mixed-race, and how we should stop caring about preserving human diversity. So at the very least, they are apathetic to the destruction of human diversity.

Quote:

Now most of the others, may not promote genocide outright, but promote policies that may lead to it. Such as insane immigration policies, their love-affair with miscegenation, etc.

Hold up now!-you cry out, no doubt spilling what you were drinking in this outburst-antis are in the pockets of jews and communists, who dowant to destroy the white race! Aha! We just expose this to antis to make them think!

Except all that stuff about jews and communists? Also poppycock (the jury is out on whether or not it's hogwash, since jews can't eat pork).

THere is no gosh darn freakin jewish conspiracy to destroy the white race. You are insaneif you honestly think that an entire ethnic group could possibly work together out of nothing but inherent malice so that they can destroy the white race and control the world. Humans do not work that way. Neither are all jews malicious; that's another completely bonkers thing to believe.

Many communists, on the other hand, do want to control the world. But race has nothing to do with it. They want to crush all forms of individuality, expression, and free-thought in order to make this goal easier. Destroying any race, far less the White Race is not a part of their goal.

Communists and Jews both work for their own interests, and their interests do not correlate with ours, hence the conflict. Yes, most do not have some scheme planned out where they strive to destroy specifically the White race, but, due to their policies and views of the world, they nonetheless would hurt it.

It is true that some people may exaggerate the threatening intentions, but in reality, it's more of a conflict of interests. For example, Jews thrive in multi-racial/multi-cultural societies, and thus promote open-borders (also feel more secure in such a society). Communists are Marxist-Globalists, who desire the total assimilation of humanity. Now you see how those intentions/interests conflict with ours?

First of all, are you aware how that definition came to be, and where it originated from? Check Lemkin's original definition, which was the source of the UN's definition. Also, study the deliberations at the UN, and how the Soviet's pressured the UN to change the definition as well.

Anyway, with what is occurring right now, one can make the case that the current situation can fall in following UN methods of genocide:

# (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
# (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

Anyway, I almost care what a globalist organization like the UN thinks. Through my research and analysis I came to the conclusion that the present system and its policies are harmful to the White race, and ultimately could lead to our demise as a distinct biological and cultural group.

P.S: Your definition is too broad in terms of UN standards. Political groups don't fall into that category, neither do social groups, thanks to the Soviets.

Quote:

This word clearly has a high value in an appeal to emotion, and I suspect that's why so many of you throw it around all the time, despite the overwhelming majority of antis not supporting anything like genocide

Yes, it is a strong word, it draws much attention to our cause. And like I explained, most "antis" are probably not aware what they are promoting, and many would not care if in the future we all looked like Obama. I say Obama because recently I saw a television special on human evolution, where scientists were pleasantly happy to say that in the future we will all look like that mongrel.

It's beautiful, how subtly (well not quite "subtle," actually, more deceptive) this serves to poison the well before the anti even begins his or her argument. Many threads started by WNs, demanding an anti response, abandon any other form of argument, and simply say something like "Why do you want to destroy the white race?" "Why do you hate the white race?" "Why do you support the genocide of the white race?" etc. etc.

How can anyone trust the arguments presented by people with such evil goals? No one can, of course. The antis have been defeated by their own evil machinations!

Except that's all poppycock and hogwash of the highest order.

Granted, there are a few, a very few, radical rabbis, or black supremacists and the like, who do actively hate the white race, many who want to destroy it. But they rarely come here, they don't represent mainstream America, and they certainly don't represent the typical anti-racist.

Hold up now!-you cry out, no doubt spilling what you were drinking in this outburst-antis are in the pockets of jews and communists, who dowant to destroy the white race! Aha! We just expose this to antis to make them think!

Except all that stuff about jews and communists? Also poppycock (the jury is out on whether or not it's hogwash, since jews can't eat pork).

THere is no gosh darn freakin jewish conspiracy to destroy the white race. You are insaneif you honestly think that an entire ethnic group could possibly work together out of nothing but inherent malice so that they can destroy the white race and control the world. Humans do not work that way. Neither are all jews malicious; that's another completely bonkers thing to believe.

Many communists, on the other hand, do want to control the world. But race has nothing to do with it. They want to crush all forms of individuality, expression, and free-thought in order to make this goal easier. Destroying any race, far less the White Race is not a part of their goal.

This word clearly has a high value in an appeal to emotion, and I suspect that's why so many of you throw it around all the time, despite the overwhelming majority of antis not supporting anything like genocide.

Let's look at the U.N. definition of genocide and see if it applies to multiculturalism and diversity:

U.N Resolution 260 (III). Article 2 defines genocide as:

Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Anti-racists are not only genocidal maniacs, they're suicidal. These nut jobs advocate their own demise. That makes them dangerous and far more of a threat to our people and nations than terrorism. Anti-racists have no morally redeeming qualities whatsoever. They're among the worst that humanity has to offer. That's why they need to be neutralized and eradicated.

It's beautiful, how subtly (well not quite "subtle," actually, more deceptive) this serves to poison the well before the anti even begins his or her argument. Many threads started by WNs, demanding an anti response, abandon any other form of argument, and simply say something like "Why do you want to destroy the white race?" "Why do you hate the white race?" "Why do you support the genocide of the white race?" etc. etc.

How can anyone trust the arguments presented by people with such evil goals? No one can, of course. The antis have been defeated by their own evil machinations!

Except that's all poppycock and hogwash of the highest order.

Granted, there are a few, a very few, radical rabbis, or black supremacists and the like, who do actively hate the white race, many who want to destroy it. But they rarely come here, they don't represent mainstream America, and they certainly don't represent the typical anti-racist.

Hold up now!-you cry out, no doubt spilling what you were drinking in this outburst-antis are in the pockets of jews and communists, who dowant to destroy the white race! Aha! We just expose this to antis to make them think!

Except all that stuff about jews and communists? Also poppycock (the jury is out on whether or not it's hogwash, since jews can't eat pork).

THere is no gosh darn freakin jewish conspiracy to destroy the white race. You are insaneif you honestly think that an entire ethnic group could possibly work together out of nothing but inherent malice so that they can destroy the white race and control the world. Humans do not work that way. Neither are all jews malicious; that's another completely bonkers thing to believe.

Many communists, on the other hand, do want to control the world. But race has nothing to do with it. They want to crush all forms of individuality, expression, and free-thought in order to make this goal easier. Destroying any race, far less the White Race is not a part of their goal.

This word clearly has a high value in an appeal to emotion, and I suspect that's why so many of you throw it around all the time, despite the overwhelming majority of antis not supporting anything like genocide.

Do you actually have an argument to offer, or do you think that simply saying poppycock in a pompous manner suffices?

Do you know how many white people have been killed by non-whites in America, since the civil rights movement?

More than the total number of American troops killed in all our wars and military campaigns, and we've had a fair few of them.

That's right, you have more chance of dying on the streets of Detroit, than the streets of Baghdad.

That's a fun statistic for you, isn't it?

Hey, while we're on the subject of Detroit, I copied this from another site earlier, for a guy with similar delusions to yours, so I might as well share it with you too.

"Detroit was for many years a flourishing city with for over eighty years, a population in excess of one million. That has now changed. Detroit's population has dipped below one million, largely as the result of continuing White flight which has offset a near doubling of the city's Mestizo population, according to the 2000 census.

Detroit dropped to the nation's tenth largest city -- from seventh. Estimates before the official census publication on November 10th put the city's population at 965,084. Until now, Detroit kept more than a million residents since the 1920s, when it was the nation's fourth-largest city.

The picture of a once White city has changed however. Groups such as Hispanics and other ethnic aliens the census counts as "White." Even including these groups, the White population has plummeted to 116,599, or 12.3 percent, of the city's population.

The city's Black population also dropped, slipping from 777,916 in 1990 to 771,966 in 2000. But according to the census, their percentage of the population actually rose, from 76 percent to 81.2 percent. (Blacks leaving Detroit have tended to relocate to suburbs such as Southfield, Oak Park, Warren, Royal Oak and Ferndale, the numbers indicate.)

"The number of people coming from Central and South America and Mexico is just incredible," said Harvey Santana, a legislative assistant to City Councilman Kenneth Cockrel Jr. Cockrel headed the city's census campaign in the largely Mestizo area of southwest Detroit. "Even though the numbers don't show it, I would go as far as to say there are 100,000 Latinos in southwest Detroit."

Remember that earlier figure of 116,599 "Whites?" Taking out the 100,000 or so alien Mestizos leaves a very small number of Whites in a city of nearly one million."

Nearly a million white people have fled from a city with a murder rate of 42.6 per 100,000, but some how they are missing from your equations, just like all the murder victims, and the rape victims, and every other victim in this whole sorry mess.

But hey, who needs to worry about actually dealing with facts, who needs to worry about ethnic cleansing (and a million people being forced from their homes is ethnic cleansing, if it takes place in a city in any other country!), and who needs to worry about more casualties, than a warzone, when we can just say poppycock, instead, and pretend it's not happening?

It's beautiful, how subtly (well not quite "subtle," actually, more deceptive) this serves to poison the well before the anti even begins his or her argument. Many threads started by WNs, demanding an anti response, abandon any other form of argument, and simply say something like "Why do you want to destroy the white race?" "Why do you hate the white race?" "Why do you support the genocide of the white race?" etc. etc.

How can anyone trust the arguments presented by people with such evil goals? No one can, of course. The antis have been defeated by their own evil machinations!

Usually when I encounter antis I don't see them as evil doers. They're just people like us here looking to discuss issues on race. Something you can't do in mainstream due to thought police and political correctness.

Quote:

Except that's all poppycock and hogwash of the highest order.

Ya, because as we all know antis conduct themselves with the highest respect and dignity, never smearing WNs will silly names to bash their arguments.

Quote:

Granted, there are a few, a very few, radical rabbis, or black supremacists and the like, who do actively hate the white race, many who want to destroy it. But they rarely come here, they don't represent mainstream America, and they certainly don't represent the typical anti-racist.

The end result of multiculturalism is the extinction of white people and their nations. How much more anti-white could it be?

Quote:

Hold up now!-you cry out, no doubt spilling what you were drinking in this outburst-antis are in the pockets of jews and communists, who dowant to destroy the white race! Aha! We just expose this to antis to make them think!

Except all that stuff about jews and communists? Also poppycock (the jury is out on whether or not it's hogwash, since jews can't eat pork).

THere is no gosh darn freakin jewish conspiracy to destroy the white race. You are insaneif you honestly think that an entire ethnic group could possibly work together out of nothing but inherent malice so that they can destroy the white race and control the world. Humans do not work that way. Neither are all jews malicious; that's another completely bonkers thing to believe.

Ya, we're all just insane I guess. Nothing for you to worry about. Move along.

Quote:

Many communists, on the other hand, do want to control the world. But race has nothing to do with it. They want to crush all forms of individuality, expression, and free-thought in order to make this goal easier. Destroying any race, far less the White Race is not a part of their goal.

This word clearly has a high value in an appeal to emotion, and I suspect that's why so many of you throw it around all the time, despite the overwhelming majority of antis not supporting anything like genocide.

The bloodless genocide is a reality whether there's a conspiracy or agenda behind it. I suspect you're an anti-white yourself and us having an actual argument for the movement is quite frustrating to you.

__________________

Quote:

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Hart-Cellar Act, INS, Act of 1965, Pub.L. 89-236)[1] abolished the National Origins Formula that had been in place in the United States since the Immigration Act of 1924. It was proposed by United States Representative jew Emanuel Celler of New York

I think it is more of a satirical response to the myriad antis that come here asking WNists "Why do you hate all black people?" or "Why do you want to kill Jews?" or one of a plethora other mundane, worn out questions they ask us ad nauseum.

Let’s examine C and E. Forced busing of blacks into white schools and whites into black schools. This definitely falls right smack under the ‘e’ clause.

Forced integration policies designed to ensure that no one race; particularly white communities, have a right to freely associate, work and live solely with members of their own race.

Affirmative Action programs that replaces whites with less qualified non-whites in the workplace; thus reducing white physical presence is another form of physical destruction. Their presence is physically restricted in a particular environment, and this may have deprived millions of whites of a means to sustain their lives.

Federal and State housing laws, rules and policies that force white communities to accept non-whites; thereby driving out whites, and reducing living spaces and communities needed for white culture and race to thrive, live and sustain its heritage. These are some of the federal diversity initiatives that are bringing about physical destruction to US white communities, of their presence in government, the military, and in the employment sector…

The US federal program of forced diversity violates the articles of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide and its subsequent clauses. No?

Let's look at the U.N. definition of genocide and see if it applies to multiculturalism and diversity:

U.N Resolution 260 (III). Article 2 defines genocide as:

Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Anti-racists are not only genocidal maniacs, they're suicidal. These nut jobs advocate their own demise. That makes them dangerous and far more of a threat to our people and nations than terrorism. Anti-racists have no morally redeeming qualities whatsoever. They're among the worst that humanity has to offer. That's why they need to be neutralized and eradicated.

The Federal Government's forced Diversity programs, and its associated policies, regulations, laws, and rules, and the methods it used to promulgate this program violates clause “D” big time. Yet, justice can not be served, because it would reveal the hypocrisy of the US to the entire world.

(c) Any form of population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;

and here's another one

Quote:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

There is no gosh darn freakin jewish conspiracy to destroy the white race. You are insaneif you honestly think that an entire ethnic group could possibly work together out of nothing but inherent malice so that they can destroy the white race and control the world. Humans do not work that way. Neither are all jews malicious; that's another completely bonkers thing to believe.

I explained most of it in the PM conversation we had. The Ashkenazi Jews are one of the largest promoters of Third-World immigration. Look at the Jewish-dominated media, the ADL, Government, etc... and you will see this. These AIPAC freaks like George W Bush & Obama are doing nothing to stop illegal immigration.

You say you want a multiculturial society. Do you realize a study by the Department of Justice concluded that Blacks & latinos were something like FOUR times as likely to commit a crime than Whites are? Obviously these people aren't people who we want to live amongst. And when you study ancient civilizations, it was Western Civilization that has been the most sucessful form. So what's the purpose of inviting a bunch of Non-Western people to live on our lands? That makes no sense and is typical Reptilian-Minded emotionalist nonsense. If we are going to have a Space-faring Type 1 civilization, as Dr. Michio Kaku says, then we will need a society that doesn't promote gang-thug culture (as the Negroids do) and a culture that doesn't promote drugs & violence like the Latinos. If any of these groups were to be dominant/majority in America then say goodbye to Humanity.

Why is Western Civilization important? Look at the paradises that inhabit the Middle East. Or Africa, Latin America, etc.. Obviously our form of civilization needs to be protected. And having a bunch of degenerate Arabids becoming a majority in Europe IS dangerous. Extremely dangerous. Same with having a bunch of degenerate latino thugs in America. May be you as a Jew should move to a nation like Brazil and see if you enjoy it much. Not the white paradises there either, go to the urban trashy Mesitzo-run cities.

Finally, the Ashkenazi Jew is not an Aryan. There are some Jews that are 100% White/Aryan but they are rare. Ashkenazis are a mixture of Arabid, Europid, Turkic/Khazar, and perhaps even Negroid. So obviously you are not a European peoples, despite the fact your religion comes directly from our mythology from Sumer.

Quote:

Do you know how many white people have been killed by non-whites in America, since the civil rights movement?

More than the total number of American troops killed in all our wars and military campaigns, and we've had a fair few of them

Exactly. The Department of Justice basically confirms what we have been saying for years. Blacks & Mesitzos cannot live in a society with Whites. End of story.

From AmRen:

"Citing US Department of Justice statistics showing that “Whites are the victim in 90 percent of all violent crimes involving blacks and whites”, Calabro said. Denver Chief of Police Gerald R. Whitman and Denver FBI Special Agent in Charge Philip B. J. Reid must investigate these attacks as racially motivated hate crimes by African American blacks against innocent white citizens, said Calabro."