"Dr. Rene Hexel" <rh@vip.at> writes:
> Thanks for your efforts, Eric. As you may have noted
> from the commit messages, in the last days, I have
> converted a few GNOME packages to now use buildlink. I do
Yes, i have noticed. I had GConf and OAF done when i did cvs
update and saw your changes.
> devel/libglade devel/bonobo devel/gal sysutils/gnome-vfs
> math/gnumeric
Here are the ones i will be working on today. Let me know if you
already have plans and i'll stay out of the way :).
Need to create buildlink.mk:
x11/gnome-core (yes, it has libraries)
devel/libgtop
x11/gtk--
x11/gnome--
devel/libsigc++
I plan to send-pr patches to make the following packages
USE_BUILDLINK_ONLY:
x11/gdm
x11/controlcenter
print/ggv (which has incorrect DEPENDS anyway)
devel/glade (again with the incorrect DEPENDS)
x11/gnome-applets
x11/gnome-core
games/gnome-games
misc/gnome-pim
misc/gnome-utils
x11/gtk-engines
sysutils/gtop
graphics/imlib
> At the first glance, this looks okay. I trust you have
> tested this with some dependent package on your system?
Yes, as i said in my original message, i tested this by making
gnome-print USE_BUILDLINK_ONLY and including x11.buildlink.mk.
--
Eric Gillespie, Jr.
mailto:epg@pretzelnet.org <*> jabber:pretzelgod@jabber.org
"This movie sure is gory!"
"Yeah, but that's one cute pig."