Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the
Matrix, on the 26th of May, 2009. Now I generally tell people to look
into cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, to download the previous talks I've
given, there's hundreds of them, you can choose from. And I try to go
over the history, and give you the shortcuts to the big picture of this system
which runs this world. It's a system, organized, it's the only truly
organized system on the planet, and within this system they plan the future,
and they literally alter cultures and societies, intergenerationally, so that
they can "make it so" as they say. That's one of their sayings,
so mote it be; they make it so. And it's not a difficult science to
understand when you already own all the commerce and the banking, and
everything that flows from it. Everything comes from that one capstone,
from the moneyed system, education, prime indoctrinational tool, necessary to
indoctrinate each generation as it's growing up into the new system, which they
live in, you see, and they bypass the older, their purpose is gone. So
look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com, for these particular shows, and remember
too, you'll be diverted to another site, because the .com isn't working properly.
It hasn't been since Friday, and yahoo, just with all their expertise, can't
figure out why I can't upload to them. It's a big mystery, but you see,
that's how hassles come, when you're doing the right thing. It's nothing
you can ever take into a court system with you, it's just all strange
coincidences that you're armed with. Lots, and lots, and lots of them,
mind you, but you can never prove anything in a court. All they have to
do at the top is give someone the nod, and they can upset the apple cart at the
other side at yahoo, and bingo, my sites go down. That's what happened on
Friday when two went down, the .com and the .net. The .net is up and
working now, but the .com, still, strangely enough, it can't take uploads past
about 3 megs. Yahoo can do it from their end. They can upload
massive sites to it, and massive even gigs to it, but I can't upload 3 megs
from my site. It's a mystery. That's how harassment is really done
in the real world. Also look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for
transcripts of these talks, which you can download for print up, written in the
various languages of Europe. And I'm in the process of putting up other
sites. Now this all costs money, and you have to get other sites up in
case the other ones get pulled or go down or whatever. That's years of
talks lost suddenly. And it costs money to do this. It's a seven
day a week job, non-stop, because you're either programming computers and
starting them up from scratch, or dealing with yahoo and so on. Non-stop.
It's up to you. If you want to support me, you can go into
cuttingthroughthematrix.com, or any of the other sites I have, which is listed
on that site. And use paypal or personal check within the U.S. or
Canada. You can purchase what I have for sale, it's not much. That
keeps me going. Or you can donate to me. It's up to you if you want
this kind of information given to you, without taking you off into the outer
limits, and there's lots of entertainers out there making a lot of money,
taking you off into the outer limits, because people love to be fascinated as
Adam Weishaupt said himself.

We really are going into this, the Century of Change.
The Century of Change was talked about at the beginning of even the
1900s. They talked about the end of the Millennium, and what would
happen, because this century that we're now in was to be the century where
everything that was planned will come to pass. Back with more after these
messages.

Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix.
Talking about the Century of Change, how we're going into a planned society, a
world society. Everyone knows what family planning is; it's a term for
abortion, basically. And a world society is to basically follow the same
mandate, where population is to be strictly regulated. And the United
Nations has already said in many documentaries, and many of their publications,
that China is a model state for the World to emulate. Well what is
China? It's supposedly still a Communist country, run by a form of
dictatorship of the proletariat, and yet, as if by magic, and we know it was
planned by the West since they created the Modern China in the first place, it
suddenly became capitalist, in no time at all, after the GATT Treaty was
signed. And the West moved all its factories over to China. Now no
country would do that. You would never move your main factories,
especially those to do with metal workings and so on, stuff that could be used
for war. You would never move your prime method to defend yourself, over
to supposedly your main enemy's camp, and give it to them on a plate.
That tells you there is no threat from China. It's owned lock, stock, and
barrel, by the masters who run the Western World already, you see. That's
a clue to it.

Depopulation is a prime mandate. I've read so many
articles from different organizations, Optimal Population Trust and so on, big
foundations, all backed by all the other big foundations. And there are
thousands of other foundations that are actually fronts, each working on a
specific aspect of the social spectrum, that's their specialty, and with
lobbying government. They're all funded from about five or six, ten at
the most, main foundations. The real foundations. These foundations
had no problems at their start up, telling the public what they were all about,
and it was to do with eugenics. Getting rid of the inferior types of
humanity, and creating this super-man, as they talked about, long before Adolf
Hitler grabbed it and ran with it, because the Soviets were already running
with it before Adolf came along. Depopulation is a big, big thing.
And I've talked before, and read so many articles about the ways to kill off
people. I've gone through even the CBC's documentary on The Disappearing
Male. After I mentioned it, it was pulled from the CBC so I found another
link that was up elsewhere. Last week I mentioned an article from the
Globe and Mail, and boom, the next day it was pulled again. So I found an
alternative link to another article about the same kind of thing. It's
amazing, when you attract attention to that which is already publicly made, but
you tell the public what to think about it, that's when they pull it. You
see, Brzezinski was correct, he said, shortly the public will be unable to
reason for themselves. They'll expect the media to do the reasoning for
them. So when you point out the obvious, what should be obvious to them,
they start to think about it and take it seriously. If there's no comment
made on something, the public will not react to it. So everything that's
published really is just a legality, because you acquiesce to it by your
silence. This is all legal terminology they use.

I've gone on and read from mainstream medical journals about
the incredible, sudden increases in allergy, 40 to 50% now, total allergy
syndromes bursting out all over. The obese population. The new
diabetes that's sprouting everywhere, everyone is suddenly becoming diabetic
and overweight, and all the rest of it, and coming down with all kinds of
cancers, yadda, yadda, ya. And I've read many, many articles, mainstream
articles and medical articles about them. And how it's a big mystery to
the medical profession that's totally funded by the pharma industry, which is
also the chemical industry. Here's an article that shows you what I've
been talking about is all coming to pass. And when I've been stating the
obvious for so many years and being neglected, some people will take notice of
it now that it's coming out from other quarters. This is from FSO
Editorials:

US Doctors’
association calls for Moratorium on GMO Foods (Alan: The modified foods)

by F. William
Engdahl

May 21, 2009

The American
Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) has just issued a call for an
immediate moratorium on Genetically Manipulated (GMO) Foods. In a just-released
position paper on GMO foods, the AAEM states that ‘GM foods pose a serious
health risk’ and calls for a moratorium on GMO foods. Citing several animal
studies, the AAEM concludes ‘there is more than a casual association between
GMO foods and adverse health effects’ and that ‘GM foods pose a serious health
risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive
health, (A: Yeah, they're sterilizing you) metabolic,
physiologic and genetic health.’ (A: It literally causes cancers. That's what they mean by genetic
health.) The report is a devastating blow to the multi billion
dollar international agribusiness industry, most especially to Monsanto
Corporation, the world’s leading purveyor of GMO seeds and related herbicides.

(A: I'm reading this, but I'll tell
you one thing. They're not going to change it. It's a mandate, it's
a must-be. Because, you see, it's causing the very things that they want
it to cause. They know at Monsanto what it does, because I've read
articles even from Monsanto, where even their own staff have got their
cafeteria set up, and they will not use Monsanto's foods to feed their own
employees.)

In a press
release dated May 19, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, which
describes itself as ‘an international association of physicians and other
professionals dedicated to addressing the clinical aspects of environmental
health,’ called immediately for the following emergency measures to be taken regarding
human consumption of GMO foods:

* A moratorium on GMO food; implementation of immediate long term safety
testing and labeling of GMO food.

* Physicians to educate their patients, the medical community and the public to
avoid GMO foods.

* Physicians to consider the role of GMO foods in their patients' disease
processes.

* More independent long term scientific studies to begin gathering data to
investigate the role of GMO foods on human health.

(A: They've got plenty of evidence.)

The AAEM
chairperson, Dr Amy Dean notes that ‘Multiple animal studies have shown that GM
foods cause damage to various organ systems in the body. With this mounting
evidence, it is imperative to have a moratorium on GM foods for the safety of
our patients' and the public's health.’ The President of the AAEM, Dr Jennifer
Armstrong stressed that ‘Physicians are probably seeing the effects in their
patients, but need to know how to ask the right questions. The most common
foods in North America which are consumed that are GMO are corn, soy, canola,
and cottonseed oil.’ The AAEM's position paper on Genetically Modified foods
can be found at aaemonline.org.

(A: Now remember, this soya stuff
for instance is in everything. Everything, including all the candies that
you eat.)

The paper
further states that Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) technology ‘abrogates
natural reproductive processes, (A: It's sterilizing you.) selection occurs at the single
cell level, the procedure is highly mutagenic and routinely breeches genera
barriers, and the technique has only been used commercially for 10 years.’

(A: Actually, it's been longer,
because Canada was already on it for 10 years when we found out we were the
test guinea pigs, and no one had told us.)

The AAEM paper
further states, ‘several animal studies indicate serious health risks
associated with GM food consumption including infertility, (A: Well, you see, this falls right
in with the agenda, doesn't it? What a coincidence.) immune
dysregulation (A: Which is
all the allergies you have and the constantly occurring infections), accelerated
aging (A: I know surgeons
who have told me, surgeons who do heart and lung transplants, who get the best
donors, supposedly, young, in accidents, etc, tell me, that when they open them
up, they're like old men inside. Aging diseases. Here, it says
accelerated aging. So they know this at the top. Every surgeon
knows it as well.), dysregulation of genes associated with
cholesterol synthesis, insulin regulation, (A: There's your diabetes.), cell signaling, and
protein formation, and changes in the liver, kidney, spleen and
gastrointestinal system.’ (A:
That's pretty well everything, isn't it?)

They add,
‘There is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health
effects. There is causation as defined by Hill's Criteria in the areas of
strength of association, consistency, specificity, biological gradient, and
biological plausibility. The strength of association and consistency between GM
foods and disease is confirmed in several animal studies.’

(A: There is also plenty of videos
up on Google about this kind of stuff. There has been for years.
One is from a farmer in Germany who fed the modified corn to one set of
pigs. They all became sterile. He put them back on the normal corn,
and within a month their sperm was all back to normal. They know all this
stuff at the top. This is a mandate, that's why we're all on the
stuff. And they've altered more than just what's been mentioned
here. I want people who have been following this kind of information, to
send me lists and the proof, of all the things that's published as being
modified. I want to have them and I'll read them on the air, to let the
people know what to avoid. It says:)

GMO is toxic

The AAEM paper
should give grounds for official rethinking of the current quasi laissez faire
regulatory stance to GMO in which the solemn word of the GMO seed companies
such as Monsanto is regarded as scientifically valid proof of safety.

I'll be back with more on this after these messages.

Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the
Matrix. Reading an article from the FSO editorial on GM foods. It's
no news to those who have been following it for years. As I said,
already, before I continue with another part of the same article, I'd like for
people who have proof, published proof, of what else has been modified in the
food chain, to please send it to me, and I'll compile a list of them, and read
them out over the air, to try and alert the people, as to what to try and
avoid. I think they've done it in almost everything that's out there
commercially available to the public, to be honest with you. It's a
must-be as I say. At the top of this whole pyramid system, there's no
democracy. There's only one big corporation really running the world, and
all the other parts, including Monsanto, are just specialized branches of
it. Isn't it odd that Canada for instance, admitted when it burst out in
Britain, that we were the guinea pigs in Canada for all this stuff, without
being told that the Canadian government had made a secret deal, and this was
published in the newspapers after the fact, a secret deal with Monsanto to test
it out on Canadians. Now they'd already done all the animal testing long
before that. They knew what it did to animals, which presumably would do
the same thing in humans. Of course it does. When suddenly you have
allergies. Suddenly you have massive, massive increases in people with
diabetes. Various aging diseases, etc, and cancers, you have to see and
look into what has changed. What's changed? What do they consume
that is different? What inoculations did they get that's different.
It's quite simple detective work. It doesn't take a genius to figure it
out. But the fact is they've avoided all this stuff like the
plague. It's a must-be. Whether this study will go anywhere, I
don't know. I don't think so. I think it falls in with the world
agenda for depopulation. To continue with the article, this last little
part, it says:

‘Specificity of the association of GM foods
and specific disease processes is also supported. Multiple animal studies show
significant immune dysregulation, (A: Your immune system is shot.) including upregulation
of cytokines associated with asthma (A: Asthma has rocketed through the roof, I've read so many
articles), allergy, and inflammation (A: You've got that cough you can't get rid of. Plus
they're spraying you, remember too, from the skies). Animal
studies also show altered structure and function of the liver, including
altered lipid and carbohydrate metabolism as well as cellular changes that
could lead to accelerated aging and possibly lead to the accumulation of
reactive oxygen species (ROS). Changes in the kidney, pancreas and spleen have
also been documented. (A:
Well, your pancreas is to do with insulin, for diabetes.) A
recent 2008 study links GM corn with infertility, showing a significant
decrease in offspring over time and significantly lower litter weight in mice
fed GM corn. (A: It's also
been done as I say, with pigs in Germany. And if you have a low litter
weight, that means there's less chance of the young to survive very long.) This
study also found that over 400 genes were found to be expressed differently in the
mice fed GM corn. (A:
You've got genetic alterations within your body.) These are genes
known to control protein synthesis and modification, cell signaling,
cholesterol synthesis (A:
You've all got high cholesterol out there), and insulin
regulation. (A:
You're all becoming diabetic.) Studies also show intestinal damage
in animals fed GM foods, including proliferative cell growth and disruption of
the intestinal immune system.'

This is all known at the top. So why are they pushing
it, and they even want to push more of it? Why are top politicians across
the Western hemisphere saying we've all got to go GM? Why? One
thing is for sure, they don't eat it at the top. When Tony Blair that
they're going to have to accept it in Britain, he made an exception for their
own massive, they call it a cafeteria for the politicians at Westminster, at
parliament. This massive glitzy place they call their cafeteria, where
they have their fantastic meals we'll never dream of, never mind see.
They said they wouldn't use it for the politicians; they'd have normal food,
non-GMO food for them. So why did they have to get that, but we have to
get the other stuff? It's because it's a mandate, that's why.
Simple as that. Simple as that.

Now I've talked before as well about how culture is not only
made, how it's altered, intergenerationally, and degraded
intergenerationally. I've given you the quotes from Huxley and others,
Julian Huxley, where they talked about having to take man off his pedestal,
where he was a sacred being, and life was sacred, because they'd have to bring
down the populations, etc, and rid the world of inferior types of
humanity. After all they're all eugenicists, and the Huxleys belonged to
that group, along with the Darwins. In fact, they were related to the
Darwins. And Julian Huxley was the first CEO of UNESCO, who talked about
creating the World Culture, with all of these new values in them. He
talked about the creation of apathy, and how they'd create apathy within the
public in order to bring this plan off, to pull it off, and as I say, to
dethrone man as a supreme sort of sacred being, and get everyone to believe
we're no higher than the animals. And I'm going to read to you the next
step in dehumanization, that's now being pushed as art, after this break.

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt. This is Cutting Through the
Matrix. I read articles in the past to do with how the CIA controlled the
cultural industry for the U.S. That's been disclosed recently in a book
called America's Cultural Cold War, and how the CIA literally set up what
seemed to be far left groups to push this new culture, to show that they were
so, hanging loose sort of thing, hanging loose as they used to say,
uninhibited, to try and go against the more conservative culture that the
Communists had put in place in Russia. Here they were in Russia promoting
opera for the working people, for the first time, and stuff like that, whereas
the West was going in the opposite direction. That was their excuse for
doing it, but really it was a much higher plan, because America's culture was
really set to dominate the world through degradation. Degradation of life
itself. Degradation to destroy what was the family unit, that was
intentional, that was a must-be, again written about as far back as the late
1800s by H.G. Wells, who was taught in the Red School, it was called, the Red
School in London. He was chosen to be one of many authors that would
write books about the changes that were to come, to try and attract a big following
to work towards these changes. And he actually met Sir Thomas
Huxley. Sir Thomas Huxley was the
mentor of H.G. Wells, the propagandist for this world system, and one of the
founders of the Fabian Society, funded by the world's largest international
banks. And part of it too was to destroy the family, was to destroy
everything, all values that people loved basically had to be destroyed to bring
in the new. Wells even wrote a book about free love, something they
revived in the 1960s. He wrote it in the 1890s. It wasn't his idea,
it was part of the mandate, to separate the act of sex from bonding was a prime
mandate. That's why Lord Bertrand Russell for instance had his
experimental schools approved by a Royal Charter in the 1920s, and he was allowed
to do things that other people would be lynched for doing, and also encouraging
pre-pubertal sex with the students, with the idea of seeing if when they got
older they would actually bond with someone, or if they could follow the sexual
act without the bonding process. This is all science that they were
using. Now it's used on all of society. And when there's no family
unit to stand up for an individual, then the government has got you where they
want you, where they can speak directly down to you, like the TV screen did to
Winston in 1984, Orwell's novel. No one to stand up for you.

And during America's Cultural Cold War, and it's not over,
they never let go of it, by the CIA and MI5 and MI6, that's also in the book,
with lots of declassified information to prove it, that most of the big
novelists of the 1900s, the 20th century, novelists and even the history
writers and so on, were all paid from funding from the CIA. They even
said hack novelists were chosen, people who would have never made it on their own,
but so were people in the art industry. And their part was to bring in
nihilistic art, nihilistic art with the Picasso type stuff, with disjointed
noses and ears all over the place, to give you a schizoid view of
humanity. You wouldn't love them as much in this cold, disjointed
schizoid atmosphere, and make it popular. How did they make it
popular? Well, you'll find in that same book, that Mr Rockefeller's wife
was the biggest promoter of that particular kind of art. She started buying
it by vast quantities, and all the elite knew that, so they copy, they copy the
one at the top, it was that easy. And of course they had unlimited art
editorials written for them in all the big newspapers. Very easy when you
have so much dough, isn't it? Then we saw the bodies now, bodies, hanging
on wires in display in different countries as art. Plasticized human
bodies. Freak shows as they used to call them, but now they call them
art. Before that they had fetuses, that's babies by the way, it's just a
Latin term for baby, in jars of urine, to dehumanize us again. To do
exactly what Julian Huxley said, to knock man off his pedestal of being a sort
of sacred creature, and bring him down. Well, animals wouldn't do this,
so I can't say down to the level of an animal. They wouldn't do
that. Then here is the next step, and again, too, this is someone you
wouldn't even toss a coin into their cup if they were lying on the street, with
chalk scribbles over the stones, but he's been picked up and promoted, this
particular so-called artist, to do something dastardly. Because obviously
he has no conscience. And this is from The Independent, it's called:

Body art.
Literally

An American
sculptor's work made of human skin is coming to Britain.

Andrew Johnson
reports

May 24th, 2009

Some will find
it shocking, macabre, echoing the worst allegations of Nazi atrocities. An
American artist has spent the past 20 years making sculptures out of human
skin, and is to exhibit his work in public in the UK for the first time later
this year.

Welcome to the
world of Andrew Krasnow, who has tackled one of the great taboos in art.
Günther von Hagens may have caused controversy with his Body Worlds exhibition
of human corpses, but Krasnow goes a step further.

His works include
human skin lampshades – a direct response to the belief that similar items made
from the skin of Holocaust victims were found at Buchenwald concentration camp.

Using skins
from white men who donated their bodies to medical science

(A: Do you understand, any of you
idiots who donate your bodies to medical science, it isn't going to help
anybody. It really isn't. Even that itself was part of the intent
to dehumanize yourself, and get used to the idea of a body simply getting
chopped up. See, that used to be called the desecration of a human
body. The doctors that used to hire the Burke and Hare types to dig up
corpses, so as they could cut them all open, used to be locked up in prison for
desecrating bodies. Now it's normal to desecrate bodies. And what
do they do with this thing that you donate to medical science? They give
it to perverts like this guy. Or to the ones that hang you on wires, and
put you on show. Dehumanization. Yep, Huxley, they've worked it
right, they've worked it right. We're now down to the lowest level of the
low. It says:)

Using skins
from white men who donated their bodies to medical science, he has created
freak versions of mundane items including flags, boots and maps of America – in
effect using skin like leather. His work, he says, is a commentary on human
cruelty (A: Ha, ha.) and
America's ethics and morality. (A: Yeah, uhhh.)

Anyway, that's the kind of stuff that they're pushing.
And of course, why does this guy even get a write-up? Who's pushing
him? What's next? An exhibition of human heads maybe? You
know, all kinds of heads or something? How far can you go in the world of
macabre and perversion? There's no limit really is there, because it's
all the stuff from nightmares, that's why. There's no limit. And as
I say, they wanted to dehumanize us all, and they did it so quickly. I
was rewatching an old movie recently. It was called Blast from the
Past, a good comedy, about people who went into an air raid shelter in the
60s, because they thought everything was coming to an end, and thirty years
later, their son goes up to the surface to get vital supplies, and he meets all
these strange people. But they do show you where their hatch was from
their subterranean home. It comes up in a place that used to be a
milkshake place, and then it turned into booze, a booze can, then it turned
into booze and drugs. And it gives you the music through each set of one
person's lifetime, the guy who's the owner of this particular shop.
That's how fast, how fast the culture creators could take a culture down, and
dehumanize it, in no time at all, because they had complete control over music,
over all the arts, and entertainment. All media. That's how fast,
one person's lifetime, they could take it right down, from a strong society to
a weak and fragmented society with no morals and values, and nothing to bind
them together. And I've mentioned before, too, how we always thought that
the censor departments of each country were to do with saving and protecting
your culture. Really, we found out that the opposite was true.
Their job was to see how far they could push the envelope, and were the public
ready for it. I've given you the statements before in previous talks that
were published in newspapers after the year 2001, International Censors
association, and they decided to push, they said, now that they had won the war
for homosexual entertainment and so on, it was time to push for beastiality and
intergenerational sex. That was also published in newspapers at the
time. This is from the Wise Up Journal, the 26th of May, 2009. And
it's an article that was printed in the Irish Daily Mail on the 25th of May,
but not put up on their web. I guess they don't want to offend outsiders,
you see. And it's by Mary Ellen Synon, it says:

The horror at
the dark heart of a sordid, arrogant parliament

(A: This is about the European
Parliament. It says:)

Here we are, a
few words about Brussels and how it feels about child abuse. I’ll move onto the
elections for the European parliament in a moment, but given the horrors of the
Ryan report last week, I thought that you ought to know how seriously the Euro
elite treat any suggestion of improper behavior by adults towards children.

In other words
I give you Daniel Cohn Bendit, an MEP for the German Green Party. He is a
self-confessed kiddie-fiddler, but pulling down his trouser zip for tiny
children hasn’t stopped him becoming one of the most influential members of
parliament. Here is his story. Bear in mind this man has more power over the
legislation of this country than does any member of the Dail.

Mr Cohn-Bendit
is better known as Dany the red of the 1968 Paris Barricades. He is a kind of
leftover mid-century leftie who was active in squatting, street fighting and agitation
before he re-invented himself as a Green and was elected to the European
parliament. Last month I went to watch him in a debate with Declan Ganley. The
thing was standing room only in a ballroom in a Brussels hotel.

Mr Ganley
produced a book Cohn-Bendit wrote in 1975. He read out Mr Cohn-Bendit’s account
of how he had worked in a kindergarten and allowed the children to pull down
the zip on his trousers and touch him intimately. In the book he had asked them
why they wanted to play with him and not with each other, but in the end he
‘caressed’, his word- them too. (A: He caressed them too. He called it caressing.)

Mr Cohn-Bendit
disputed none of it. Indeed when Mr Ganley finished reading, the former
kindergarten teacher whooped that he had just won €500 because he had bet
someone that Mr Ganley would read out that bit of his auto-biography. When Mr
Cohn-Bendit’s supporters did not quite give him the sort of applause he was
looking for, he changed tack and insisted that everything in the book had been
discussed in Germany and France years ago and the parents of the children had
never raised any concerns. Mr Ganley asked: ‘And the children, what did they
say?’ Dany the Red assured him and the audience that years later the children
had all said their time at the school was extremely happy. And then he went on
about how different attitudes were in the seventies.

These are the pervs, the pervs that are promoted to the
top. Why? Because, #1, they're completely blackmailable, very handy
if you want to have people that will pass any laws that you tell them to
pass. In fact, they'll do anything they're told for dough and
publicity. But these are the characters who are now at the top of the
legislative part, and that really is all there is to the European
Parliament. The rest of the politicians are just trained seals who clap
and can make suggestions about policies, but they have no ability to promote or
put them into effect. These are the kind of people who get up the ladder,
and by the way, the Green Party, remember, was invented by the Soviets, to
become the new world party. Madeline Albright's grandfather was one of
Stalin's right-hand men, and he was the one who set up this fledgling Green
Party, to take over when the Communism was slated to supposedly disappear,
actually to merge into the World System. Now, I'll go to the phones now
and see if we can get through them. There's Tim in California, are you
there Tim?

Tim: Yeah, I'm here. How are you doing Alan?

Alan: Not so bad.

Tim: I just wanted to relay a story of mine.
Recently I went to just go up to Rite Aid, at night, and what happened was, the
security guard comes to the front of the door, and asks for my ID. So I
said to him, I'm not buying booze or cigarettes, what do I need to show my ID
for? I guess it turns out that the city I live in has just started this
new thing where any store you go to after midnight, you have to show your ID
regardless of whether or not you're buying cigarettes, or alcohol, or anything
like that.

Alan: Really?

Tim: I didn't know if this was a new thing in California,
or I was just wondering if you had heard anything about that?

Alan: If it starts in California, it will be copied by
all the other states in no time at all. It always is.

Tim: Yeah. It's weird to see it happening. I
was wondering when the next step was going to actually come into view, and sure
enough, I go there, and I'm like wow, this is really strange, you know, not
that I knew this wasn't going to happen. I'd been expecting it, but I
just didn't know it was going to be so soon. It's weird to see it
actually happening, and I'm sure the next step is the real ID card.

Alan: That's right.

Tim: You won't be able to go into any store I suppose
without showing your ID, and I guess it just progresses on to the brain chip,
and step by step by step, like you always talk about.

Alan: What they're going to do is hassle everyone so
much, and make them feel so uncomfortable, that they give you the ID card with
the active chip, and tell you to carry it at all times, and these things will
be scanned remotely. That saves you the actually being confronted with
the cops, so you feel better, and we'll all breathe a sigh of relief to be able
to pass through without having to be stopped, etc, and questioned.

Tim: Can I hang on until after the music, after the
commercials?

Alan: Yes. Back in a few moments after these
messages.

Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, Cutting Through the Matrix, and
we've got Tim on the line from California. Are you still there Tim?

Tim: Yeah, I'm still here. I just wanted to add
that I didn't show my ID. I said I wouldn't be shopping there
again. And when I asked why they're doing it, the lady said that of
course it was the law in the entire city area there, but she also said that
they had two thefts at night, which is normal for a store of that type, I'm
sure. So that's just the justification of course that they're using for
it. But I was also thinking that maybe what they're doing is a trial
thing, and they're also seeing how people are reacting, based upon how people
react and what not.

Alan: They do trials all the time in fact. They
used, I think Orillia in Ontario Canada, and they made them completely
cashless, all volunteers cashless for two or three years and studied them, and
how they reacted to using nothing but their cards in all the stores. And
that was used for the rest of the country, and the world basically, that
particular study. And California is used for a lot of studies.

Tim: For sure. I was also thinking about the name,
Rite Aid. You have the first two letters: Ra. And I was thinking
about that, and I was also thinking about the name, Rite Aid itself, and it's
the Rite, which would be the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry or something like that
wouldn't it?

Alan: Yes. They'll have their little joke in there
too. Quite something.

Tim: Yeah, it's just amazing to see this actually
happening. But I'll let another caller get on. Thank you so much
Alan for taking my call.

Steven: That's good. I've been listening to your
show ever since October. You were a guest on the Alex Jones show one day,
and ever since then I've been listening to your show. I must say that I'm
honored to speak to you, and I admire your work and your courage. I guess
I picked a good day to call in, because there's two topics I want to address
that you were talking about earlier. One was transgenics, and the other
would be the post-humanism, the robotic merge they want to implement on the
population. I recently was at a dinner, and the issue of transgenics came
up, and I got into a little debate, me and some of my relatives. I was
trying to explain to them how transgenics are GMO foods, where they insert a
foreign gene into the plant, I mentioned Monsanto and their soybean seeds and
the cotton seeds, even quoted the film, The World According to Monsanto, he was
in agreement that transgenics wouldn't have brought the human population as far
as it has come, because there's not enough space, and they produce more yield,
then the traditional organic farming. I was trying to explain it to him
that it wouldn't, it doesn't work. And I've also, I actually emailed him
several links where studies have shown that the GMO foods do not produce more
yield.

Alan: Actually, it's one third less of production.

Steven: Right, that's what I was trying to explain to
him, but he was like I don't really believe that, we need transgenics.
And I even brought up how they do it on the animal side, with the glow in the
dark monkeys, the glow in the dark, they did in Japan, and it's just amazing
how they really believe that these are for the betterment of mankind, even
though studies have shown it does not work. And why would you even want a
genetically modified seed, or glow in the dark dogs, for another reason.
This is not the way we were intended to be. It seems that I was trying to
explain to him that science has run amuck and that it is really going to be the
new priesthood, and our new world we're going to where science would rule
everything, and we would bow down to a scientist.

Alan: You literally have a small group of people who will
be in charge of the entire food supply of the world. That's what you are
looking at, and I think it was Kissinger who said that, whoever controls the
food supply and the water of the world will control/own the world. They
control the entire planet. That's power, that's incredible power.

Steven: I hear the music coming in. I actually
turned down going graduate school at certain University in Texas, because I
found out that the Department was funded by Monsanto.

Alan: That's right. Thanks for calling, that's the
end of the show now, the music is in. So from Hamish, who's the dog, and
myself, it's Good Night from Canada. May your god or your gods go with
you.