How about no rock throwing. That's crappy behavior. My policy is: "No rock throwing regardless of housing situation." Don't do it. There is one exception though. If you're trapped in a glass house, and you have a rock, then throw it. What are you, an idiot? So maybe it's "Only people in glass houses should throw rock, provided they are trapped in the house with a rock." It's a little longer, but yeah.

Wow... when you completely misunderstood the post, have a horrible argument and no ground to stand on... critique his use of internet forum quotes.

Good one. I think we have a winner.

Right, so when he quotes someone and says something bad in response to that and it makes it look like hes ripping the person hes quoting, I'm supposed to actually know that hes not being sarcastic (although he quoted someone and it could easily be taken as complete sarcasm) and know in fact that he was talking about someone else... Sorry I didn't catch the "Dnutz" meant DChess.

Right, so when he quotes someone and says something bad in response to that and it makes it look like hes ripping the person hes quoting, I'm supposed to actually know that hes not being sarcastic (although he quoted someone and it could easily be taken as complete sarcasm) and know in fact that he was talking about someone else... Sorry I didn't catch the "Dnutz" meant DChess

Uh oh... don't talk about me while quoting Tactica. Someone might get all uppity and confused.

And it was already established. I said NOTHING negative about DawgBone. You need to use the powers of word comprehension to figure out what things mean....

Not when the ring can send a pulse of some sort and shatter glass. Which brings me to another Demetri Martin quote...

I like the game rock paper scissors but 2/3rds. Like Rock beats Scissors. Oh man, these scissors are all bent I cant cut with them, you win. Or Scissors beats Paper. This paper is cut into strips itís useless I cant write on it, you win. Then, Paper beats RockÖ.Rock is fine! There is no structural damage to rock. Rock can break through paper whenever it wants. Paper sucks. It should be Rock, Explosives with a cuttable wick, Scissors.

And I'm excited that Shaun Rogers is on the Browns. Finally fixing up that old lazy d-line and making it a young lazy d-line. Now we know laziness will be in the Browns organization for years to come.

but honestly i dont care about the third rounder. the whole point of these deals like i said a billion times is to put talent around DA and see what he can do before we go to quinn. if rogers and bodden or both motivated and in shape, i feel rogers is the much better player. a couple years ago he was dominant. also playing in detroit wouldnt really give me much of a boost to go 110%.

Right, so when he quotes someone and says something bad in response to that and it makes it look like hes ripping the person hes quoting, I'm supposed to actually know that hes not being sarcastic (although he quoted someone and it could easily be taken as complete sarcasm) and know in fact that he was talking about someone else... Sorry I didn't catch the "Dnutz" meant DChess.

Anyways simple miscommuncation, sorry to Wingboy though.

Everyone else figured out the 1st grade story problem. It's OK, though... there's always that one kid that stays late for help.

in closing the trade works for both teams. we need dline and you need players and a cb. it works for everyone. also didnt knwo people would get so worked up over nothing. i thought everyone knew detroit wasnt going anywhere anytime soon?

in closing the trade works for both teams. we need dline and you need players and a cb. it works for everyone. also didnt knwo people would get so worked up over nothing. i thought everyone knew detroit wasnt going anywhere anytime soon?

Yeah... and most probably didn't think the Browns were going anywhere "anytime soon" last year. Teams in the NFL can shift year after year, which makes it possible for any team (yes, Lions included) to surprise and make a run.

Are you actually surprised that Lions' fans reacted that way to your comment? I hope not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bret hart

looking at this trade more its clear the lions got ripped off

The Lions didn't want Rogers at all (Marinelli said he wouldn't be on the team next year). We received a starting CB and a 3rd round pick for him. Don't quite see how they got "ripped off".

Lions easily win this trade. Rogers could be great when motivated, but he wasn't motivated in Detroit and that's exactly the attitude that they needed to get rid of in Detroit so that, just maybe, they could have a winning team. Rogers needed to go. Getting a starter and a 3rd=good deal.

Sorry for missing out Cincy. But with your ownership I cannot believe you have only had 1 winning season in the last 17 years and they think the Browns were the worste in the division? Weve had 2 since 1999 LOL!