CCIE R&amp;S Written Class-on-Demand — The IT Networking Communityhttps://ieoc.com/
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:27:34 +0000enCCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demand — The IT Networking CommunityUpdated 2019 Az-300 Dumps PDFhttps://ieoc.com/discussion/36541/updated-2019-az-300-dumps-pdf
Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:40:14 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandriyajhon36541@/discussionsRealdumpspdf is an amazing resource that facilitates AZ-300 dumps pdf those who want to pass their Microsoft certification az-300 exams in a just first attempt. If you have not much time to get prepared for your AZ-300 exam then you must consider Realdumpspdf az-300 braindumps. They have all verified exam questions answers which cover the core topics of the AZ-300 exam very comprehensively. We claim that your AZ-300 exam success is 100% guaranteed and will refund you completely if you fail.
]]>
CCIE Routing &amp; Switching v5 Written Exam Video Coursehttps://ieoc.com/discussion/34148/ccie-routing-amp-switching-v5-written-exam-video-course
Sun, 13 Mar 2016 05:21:38 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandlayer4down34148@/discussionsHello all,

Please forgive me if this is being discussed elsewhere; I would be happy to be referred to where ever that link might be. Otherwise, I'm wondering if anyone know's whether or not this new CCIE Routing & Switching v5 Written Exam Video Course will actually be preparing one for the v5.0 or v5.1 exam? Although I understand that the material would be 90% same, the new 7.0 Evolving Technologies portion does account for 10% of the v5.1 exam, so it would be nice to know how aggressively I need to study to be adequately prepared (last day to take v5.0 is July 24, 2016). Thank you in advance!

I'm hesitating this is the right place for such a question, but I have found no better one.

I have couple of INE products and I've bought all-products subsciptions recently. I mostly use streaming to watch the videos (usually laptop, but also winphone). I'm wondering if it is possible to click a button somewhere and make playback some 20-30 per cent faster, as I would definitely comprehend them well and save time.

I've been through the Deep Dive courses, and most of the ATC. I have not looked at the Learning Series or the Written COD yet. (Also been through WB I and working through WB II)

I'll be taking my Written at Live in Orlando so I just want to make sure I knock out what I need to.

Thanks!

]]>
Closed Captions on INE Training Videoshttps://ieoc.com/discussion/23826/closed-captions-on-ine-training-videos
Sat, 27 Oct 2012 18:49:05 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-DemandDarkgc23826@/discussionsHi, I am unable to view the closed captions or subtitles on the INE training videos after downloaded them from the INE account using various media players, including windows, quicktime and vlc. However, I checked that the free sample videos on the INE website they do have the CC feature and can be toggled on or off on the web based video player. Has anyone also faced this issue? Pls advise. Thanks.]]>
Section 1 Layer 2 Technologies Connection Diagramhttps://ieoc.com/discussion/21694/section-1-layer-2-technologies-connection-diagram
Sun, 06 May 2012 14:14:30 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandtonyv21694@/discussionsIs there a diagram that displays the physical cabling for the switches? The diagram for sections 1 - 6 display router connections and several switch connections, but the bridging and switching section tasks list steps that require knowledge of the switch-to-switch connections. The initial configs for switches don't contain any hints, so I'm stuck trying to set up the lap in GNS3.... any suggestions?]]>
Seeking Prep Guidance for the R&amp;S Writtenhttps://ieoc.com/discussion/21225/seeking-prep-guidance-for-the-r-amp-s-written
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:22:27 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demand1000BaseT21225@/discussionsI have recently decided to take the step and pursue my CCIEin R&S, about 5 years ago I also considered it after doing my CCNP and CCIP certifications but life got in the way and I put that thought on the back shelf.

However I have recently reignited my desire to take my career to the next level and pursue my CCIE..I might get it and I might not, and I am ok with either - as its the attempt and knowledge I will learn from the process that is really driving me...the actual CCIE # would just be a bonus.

I have recently purchased an All Access Pass from INE, as I have been following INE for 5-6 years now. I love what they do and how they do it, so for me it was a no brainer as to which company I would select to help me with my journey.

I am looking for a suggested preparation method for my CCIE written.

As I mentioned I have my CCNP and CCIP certification but obtained those 4 or 5 years ago, so some of the knowledge is stale. Here is what I was thinking about doing to prepare, and I would like it if anyone could either comment on my planned approach or directly me to a recommend approach.

- Refresh my CCIP track knowledge, by going through the CCIP bootcamp via the All Access-Pass.

- Read over Routing TCP/IP Vol1 and Vol2 ; play with Dynamips during that process to solidify some concepts.

- Go through the CCIE Written bootcamp via the AllAccess Pass (Although there appears to be 2...a 9 hour one, and a 5 day one)

- Read through the CCIE certification Guide.

Maybe not in that order but at first thought this is what I am thinking...any feedback you could give me would be appreciated.

]]>
CCIE Written Scheduledhttps://ieoc.com/discussion/18160/ccie-written-scheduled
Fri, 06 Jan 2012 06:14:36 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandjamesp198318160@/discussionsI scheduled my CCIE Written for later this month. I have used A LOT of books, INE's Ultimate Bundle (ATCOD, Written videos, some labbing), Cisco Docs, and Boson software. I am a little nervous, but I think I am ready. I've been studying for about the past 6 months. Any advice for the home stretch?]]>
Updated version of CCIE Written COD?https://ieoc.com/discussion/17648/updated-version-of-ccie-written-cod
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:29:38 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-DemandSkipper17648@/discussionsHi,

Does anyone know if/when there will be an updated version of the CCIE Written COD?

Many thanks!

Skipper.

]]>
Comedy of Errorshttps://ieoc.com/discussion/12641/comedy-of-errors
Fri, 06 Aug 2010 07:42:59 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-DemandLance12641@/discussionsI failed the CCIE R&S Written this week with a score of 772 (790 needed to pass).

My primary study resources were the CCIE study guide by Wendell Odom and the INE CCIE Written COD.

Despite being close, I’m struggling with coming away with positives from my experience. About 1/3 of the test was targeting specific features of protocol configuration in exotic scenarios that were not covered in either of my primary resources. Specifically, weird STP scenarios, obscure BGP, EIGRP and OSPF features, and some QoS and WCCP topics that were outside of the scope of the COD or Study guide. I had never heard of some of the stuff before, was unable to find much of them in my cisco press library, and had to resort to googling the specifics to get the low down. The other 2/3 of the test was what I expected walking into the test in terms of level of difficulty, detail and complexity.

That being said, I did find the INE COD to be a valuable resource, it’s just not enough detail in many subject areas to tackle the exam (well, the exam that I pulled anyway). Same with the two practice tests – in my case, good for 2/3 of the test. I found practice test #2 to be more challenging than #1.

Other factors that contributed to outcome:

- Not enough sleep the night before (dude upstairs had a female “visitor”)

- Distractions in test center (dude was arguing with the printer)

- After the first 10 questions (which included an involved exhibit, multi-question series) took me 30 minutes, I felt compelled to rush in order to make up time. BIG MISTAKE…on at least 2 questions, I failed to read and understand the question completely and did not realize it until after I had clicked “next”….dumb. As it turned out, I had 30 minutes to spare when I finished the test.

In the end, failing the test was on me. Had I taken care of the little, non-technical preparation elements (well rested, detail –oriented approach) that may have made the difference, I am however, envious of those who crush the test with marks in the 900s……

I'm going to eventually pass this exam, just a little stunned at this outcome. I passed the CCIE written back in 2002, when it was loaded with token ring. even setting that aside, its a totally different test altogether. way more challenging topics, which is great. Other interesting observations: At one point, I though my vision was jacked, when I encountered a series of questions with blurry diagrams and nearly illegible text. I even commented on a couple questions which employed ESL grammar complete with double negatives....

The Default, lowest possible for Root; I had correctly (Although every time it told me Try again I started to doubt my answers)

This lesson did not cover (or I just missed it) the values for UplinkFast Default, Extended System ID & Recommended for Backup.

I thought since it was asked in the lesson, it was covered (the titles were just not all the values) in this lesson.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

;-)

LD

]]>
Passed CCIE Writtenhttps://ieoc.com/discussion/16664/passed-ccie-written
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:16:47 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandomagico16664@/discussionsI know it's only the first step, but I did pass on the first attempt and I only used the INE CCIE written COD. Granted I was a CCNP at one point and have over 5 years of routing and switching experience in large enterprise environments.]]>
CBWFQ - Module 5 lesson 4https://ieoc.com/discussion/11822/cbwfq-module-5-lesson-4
Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:31:45 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandck197611822@/discussionsThis forum needs some more activity.....

So I bit the bullet and purchased and starting studying off of this CoD product. My written expired due to the 3 year time limit on passing the lab so I have to retake the written again.

To cut to the chase Anthony has a portion slide that states in BOLD that you shouldn't reserve more than 75% of the availabe bandiwidth when applying bandwidth to your classes. I know this was the case in the olden days when links were less than 512kbps. Do you think this practice is still necessary today when applying CBWFW to links greater than 1.5mbps?

so that would mean max-reserved bandwidth shouldn't be used on links or is not best practice? I understand this is strictly written study but I am also looking for real work scenarios.

thanks,

CK

]]>
CCIE Written Class on Demandhttps://ieoc.com/discussion/17069/ccie-written-class-on-demand
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:50:28 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-DemandSkipper17069@/discussionsIs there any update on when the new CCIE Written Class on Demand will be available? I understand Brian McGahan was re-doing it. Or am I mistaken?

Just watching the CCIE Written R&S Videos and the proctor says, that the Bridge ID of a Switch consists of the following:

2 Byte Priority Field + 6 Byte MAC + VLAN ID

But isnt the VLAN ID extension part of the 2 Byte priority field? I thought the 2 Byte Priority field consists of 4 Bit Priority 12 Bit Extension ID.

Anyone got clearance on that?

Thanks in advance!

-m-

]]>
EIGRP successor routes...https://ieoc.com/discussion/8053/eigrp-successor-routes
Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:16:19 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-DemandNMODI8053@/discussions I was pondering on was "Feasible Successors" in EIGRP....whats the limit to having these in the EIGRP topology table....I think we can have multiple feasible successors in the topology table...

My doubt was ......do we say that there is only "ONE" successor and feasible successor route always (offcourse when we have a redundant route to destination)???...and we then have some extra backup routes in the topology table too (if any)....are these backup routes also called "feasible successors" and they just stay there.......eg. 1 successor , 1 feasible successor (metric 100) and 3 backup routes (with metric 110,120,130) .....or

if we have the backup and feasible routes with same metric ( metric 100,100,100,100)....so we do have 4 feasible successors, or again they

I know this might be a bit confusing and i havent penned this right--------basically....are all routes in the eigrp topology table called "feasible successors".....and whats the limit of feasible successors.....]]>
General Routing Concepts questions and answershttps://ieoc.com/discussion/14247/general-routing-concepts-questions-and-answers
Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:46:41 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-DemandMotomo9414247@/discussionsHello All,

I have just finished Module 1 within CCIE Written COD.

I have a few questions with the questions and then the shown answers with the Core Knowledge Lab Exam Sim

Module 1 - Lesson 1: General Routing Concepts

Question 9 of 10 Asks what is the purpose of the route to NULL0?

I answered: To avoid routing loops

The answer was significantly longer and in more detail, is this the answer that is needed on the test?

Again the answer was given in much more detail, is this what is needed on the test?

]]>
Level of detail needed in preparing for the CCIE R&amp;S Written Examhttps://ieoc.com/discussion/10455/level-of-detail-needed-in-preparing-for-the-ccie-r-amp-s-written-exam
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:58:16 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-DemandAnonymous10455@/discussionsI'm nearly 50% of the way through the CCIE Written CoD curriculum and I find that a lot of the topics are not covered to the depth I expected from this offering. Now, I'm not trying to complain about the product if this was done intentionally due to the fact that the Written Exam only goes into the depth shown throughout the CoD. Can someone verify this for me?

If I need more in depth detail what other resources do people suggest?

]]>
CCIE Written CoD Perspectivehttps://ieoc.com/discussion/12957/ccie-written-cod-perspective
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:12:45 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandck197612957@/discussionsI took the written again today and passed by the hair on my ballsack. I felt 100% better about this pass though. I did pass the written back in 3/07 but I used resources that I should never have used, pushed by my old employer Honestly, I had no business taking the written back then but I still passed it. In the 3+ year time span since I have taken the lab exam twice but failed both times, last attempt was last Sept before the switch to newest iteration of the exam. I am gearing up for the next go around in Nov. but am still nervous about tshooting.

My input here is just to add some info or maybe help someone looking to pass the written before moving on to the lab. This part of the process seems to be forgotten. I did feel that I was ready to take the written again, especially after my experience with configurations over my work and studies journey. I know it is just the written and I'm doubting myself but there is some validation to knowing the breadth of topics well. There are so many things to cover in this exam I don't think that a CoD can really do it justice. The INE CoD is nice I believe you can only use it as a quick refresher or to make an outline on a study path but if you utilize this as your only resource you will be just wasting $350.

Other resource I relied heavily on, in order of importance:

- Cisco Press Written Study Guide

- Boson Exam Sim - embedded links to the docs and explanations are key to proving you know the technology.

- INE labs Vol 1

- Written CoD

Overall, I was disappointed with about 10% of the questions. I even made some comments which I have never done before. I swear there were at least 3 questions that did not have a correct answer but again maybe I just don't know what i'm doing. And it's funny how questions just keep coming on topics that you kind of breeze over, as is always the case. I was fully prepared for BGP and Mcast but QoS just killed me on this exam. Maybe the CCIP course with INE will be a benefit for truly exanding my knowledge of this topic.

If I can provide any help or direction for people that really want to take the exam and pass the right way, the exam is no joke. Just do yourself a favor and don't take the easy way out of this part in the process to just focus on the lab. My next steps, starting tomorrow, on to finish Vol1 QoS and then starting again on to lab1 vol 2.

I started my CCIE journey back in 2006 and have been half assing it ever since but will attempt to finish it up by years end.

]]>
Written CoD Questions Out of the Bluehttps://ieoc.com/discussion/12731/written-cod-questions-out-of-the-blue
Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:43:07 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandjmadrid212731@/discussionsI have recently started using the CoD for the Written exam. I am doing the CoD while reading the Wendell Odom Cisco Press CCIE book. While the CoD has been good so far, i feel that at times it makes some quantum leaps. For instance, I am watching Module 4, Lesson 1 on OSPF and the 2nd question was to match LSA types with the Correct Flooding scope. While not an unfair question, it seems weird that this question comes right after the discussion of router types and the fact that LSA's have not been discussed whatsoever. While I can agree that this information should likely be review, it just seems odd to throw that question out there, without any previous discussion of LSA's. Not sure if I am completely off-base here or if other people have experienced the same thing. ]]>
Passed Writtenhttps://ieoc.com/discussion/10943/passed-written
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:20:46 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandauglan10943@/discussionsJust wanted say I passed the written today. Thanks Anthony for the outstanding written bootcamp. Now on to the lab preperation. [:D]

Andrew

]]>
Written Exam Study Strategyhttps://ieoc.com/discussion/10570/written-exam-study-strategy
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:12:28 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandjimmyt10570@/discussionsI'd like everyone's feedback on their study strategy for the written exam. In particular the level of detail and knowledge retention required for written.

I'm making my way through the Writen Bootcamp CoD (finding this a big help too)

I also use Cisco Press books for QoS exam, BCMSN, Fundamentals of MPLS, LAN Switching book to aid studying.

I am getting to the stage were I am feeling swamped with information. When I learn some new things I lose the retention of the finer details of the subjects I was studying a few months ago. I'm getting desperate to get this out the way and get onto the lab stuff but I want to do this thing right and set myself up properly for the next stage.

How much of the fine detail should I retain for the written? How do the rest of you go about drilling all this information into your heads. Any suggestions are welcome.

]]>
CCIE R&amp;S CoD Experiences.https://ieoc.com/discussion/9619/ccie-r-amp-s-cod-experiences
Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:32:37 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandmacnlinux9619@/discussionsSo, I'm working on getting the CCIE R&S Written out of the way by the end of March and I need some input from others that have used the CCIE R&S Written CoD as a resource. What is your impression of it?

Also for the creators of the CoD what if any supplimental reading materials come with it? Any indepth materials that go along with the CoD would be great!!!

Regards,

-Abel

]]>
Passed on the last dayhttps://ieoc.com/discussion/8677/passed-on-the-last-day
Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:02:20 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-Demandlaurel8677@/discussionsI took the CCIE written yesterday. To prepare, I used the written COD and the Cisco Press CCNP books. When I first purchased the COD I was skeptical becuase honestly, I felt it was a bit "light" -- certainly not 5 days worth of bootcamp material. But what I found from taking the exam is that while the material in the COD is concise, it is very to the point of what is actually covered on the written.

One improvement that would be nice to see on the COD material is the inclusion of some examples of OPPF networks covering info such as what nets are advertised by which routers in what type of LSA etc. and how many queries does this or that router get if link x goes down. I'm still very confused on the details of how that works in practice even though I think I understand the different LSA types and how they are used.

I'm really glad that I took the exam before it changed to the new version. The simulation type questions are much harder in my opinion than the straight out theory questions.

Consider the above topology with R1,R2,R3 and R4 connected together....all running eigrp. R1 is advertising 10.4.10.0/24 and 10.4.8.0/24 networks to R2. R2 has a distribute list which filters out routes to the 10.4.8.0/24 prefixes to its neighbor R3 ....and thus in turn R4. Due to this R3 and R4 simply have the 10.4.10./24 prefixes in their routing table.

Now R1 loses connectivity to both the 10.4.10.0/24 and 10.4.8.0/24 subnets.....obviously quesris are sent to R2 by R1 for prefixes 10.4.10.0/24 and 10.4.8.0/24.....

What kinda queries do R3 and R4 receive????

I believe that R2 receives 2 queries from R1 for the two subnets...which it in turn forwards it to R3, irrespective of the distribute-list on R2....so R3 receives two queries ...one for 10.4.10 and other for the 10.4.8 network.....R3 too forwards these two queries to the R4.....so R4 and R3 each will receive two queries ....

We know the formulae for CIR = Bc/Tc........with Be being a possibilty sometime...

This article says that the minimum Ts for voice is 10ms ....is this criterion/value true only for voice packets or even normal packets for Frame Relay Shaping...will the formula CIR=Bc/Tc hold in this case????

When configuring FRTS for voice, data performance may suffer at the expense of good voice quality. Here are some guidelines to enhance voice quality when configuring FRTS for voice:

Do not exceed the CIR of the PVC

Most users have difficulty following this recommendation because the result is the router will no longer be able to burst to port speed. Because voice quality cannot tolerate much delay, any queueing of voice packets within the Frame Relay cloud must be minimized. When CIR is exceeded (PVC CIR, not the router configured CIR), depending on the provider and how congested the rest of the Frame Relay network is, packets may begin queue in the Frame Relay network. By the time the Frame Relay switch queues have backed up enough to trigger BECNs, the voice quality is already diminished. Because customers have many different Frame Relay providers and differing amounts of congestion across their sites, it is difficult to forecast what configuration works. Maintaining values at (or below) CIR on the PVCs that transport voice has proven to work consistently.

Some providers sell a Frame Relay service of 0 CIR. Obviously, not exceeding CIR in this case would prevent any voice from being sent across the frame link. A service of 0 CIR may be used for voice but there needs to be a Service Level Agreement (SLA) with the provider to guarantee minimal delay and jitter for a certain bandwidth across the 0 CIR PVC.

Do not use frame relay adaptive shaping

If the configured CIR within the frame relay map class is the same as the true CIR of the PVC, there is no need to throttle down traffic due to BECNs. If CIR is not exceeded, BECNs are not generated.

Make Bc small so that Tc (shaping interval) is small (Tc = Bc/CIR)

The minimum Tc value is 10 ms, which is ideal for voice. With a small Tc value, there is no risk of large packets using all the shaping credits. Large Tc values can lead to large gaps between packets sent because the traffic shaper waits an entire Tc period to build up additional credits to send the next frame. Making Bc = 1000 bits is usually a low enough value to force the router to use the minimum Tc of 10ms. This setting should not affect data throughput.

Set Be = zero

To ensure the CIR value is not exceeded, Be is set to zero so there is no excess burst within the first shaping interval.

Note: A good solution employed by some customers is to use separate PVCs for data and voice. This solution enables the customer to transmit up to port speeds in the data only PVC while maintaining a load at or below CIR on the voice PVC. Some frame providers may not find the solution appropriate depending on the frame switch and its queuing structure. If possible, have the Frame Relay provider prioritize the voice PVC over the data one so that there is not any queuing delay because of the data packets."

]]>
best way to test BGP across firewall...and minumum requirements...https://ieoc.com/discussion/8055/best-way-to-test-bgp-across-firewall-and-minumum-requirements
Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:34:44 +0000CCIE R&S Written Class-on-DemandNMODI8055@/discussionsQuestion 1: I guess BGP operates on TCP port 179....what are the miminum requirements to make BGP work across a Cisco ASA firewall....

EBGP multihop...and open TCP port 179 across firewall....

Question2 : Once you are done configuring teh peers whats the best way to test the connection...

I belive pings will work (needs to be allowed through firewall)...but those are ICMP packets......not a good idea.....secondly we use telnet to test connections at times...but thats on TCP port 23....would this help...does the firewall allow all TCP connections accross firewall??? I guess not???

The the only way seems to see the BGP neighbor relationships on the routers.......check out this doc from Cisco: