Scanning electron micrograph of the nannofossil Chiasmolithus from about 60 million years ago. This genus arose after the Cretacious-Paleogene boundary mass extinction. “At the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, 93 percent of the nannoplankton went extinct,” says Timothy Bralower. “Nannoplankton are the base of the food chain in the ocean. If they go extinct, other, larger organisms that feed on them have problems.” (Credit: Timothy Bralower/Penn State)

PENN STATE (US)—An asteroid strike may not only account for the demise of ocean and land life 65 million years ago, but the fireball’s path—and resulting dust, darkness, and toxic metal contamination—may explain the geographic unevenness of extinctions and recovery.

“Our results shed light on the causes of nannoplankton extinction, how productivity was restored, the factors that controlled the origination of new species, and, ultimately, how phytoplankton influenced restoration of the entire marine ecosystem,” the team of geoscientists report in Nature Geoscience.

The researchers, using 823 samples from 17 drilling sites in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, analyzed the community structure of calcareous—shelled—nannoplankton. Included in their study were two sites—one in the Pacific and one in the South Atlantic—with reliable, accurate dating.

“At the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, 93 percent of the nannoplankton went extinct,” says Timothy Bralower, head and professor of geosciences at Penn State. “Nannoplankton are the base of the food chain in the ocean. If they go extinct, other, larger organisms that feed on them have problems.”

Scientists have collected large amounts of data on nannoplankton from this time period, but, according to Bralower, each sampling was looked at separately, and no one compiled the separate sampling results.

The team found that extinction level correlates with latitude. The highest rate of extinctions is in the Northern Hemisphere with decreasing extinction levels in the Southern Hemisphere.

Analysis of the signature of the asteroid that initiated the extinction event shows that the asteroid came into our atmosphere in the southeast and traveled toward the northwest ultimately colliding with Earth on the tip of the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico.

“This agrees with the fact that North American land plants were hammered and there was an especially severe mass extinction on that continent,” says Bralower.

The initial dust and debris from the impact crater hit the Northern Hemisphere first and hardest. Low-diversity opportunistic organisms that appear when other nannoplankton disappear persisted in the Northern Hemisphere for 40,000 years after the impact, and this hemisphere then took 270,000 years to recover.

In the south, only intermediate levels of extinction occurred and greater diversity persisted, which agrees with the minor land plant changes in the Southern Hemisphere.

The darkness caused by the collision would impair photosynthesis and reduce nannoplankton reproduction. While full darkness did not occur, the effects in the north would have lasted for up to six months. However, with ample sunlight and large amounts of nutrients in the oceans, the populations should have bounced back, even in the North, but they did not.

The researchers suggest toxic metals that were part of the asteroid heavily contaminated the Northern oceans and were the major factor inhibiting recovery.

“Metal loading is a great potential mechanism to delay recovery,” says Bralower. “Toxic levels in the parts per billions of copper, nickel, cadmium, and iron could have inhibited recovery.”

On the one hand, the researchers considered an impact scenario causing perpetual winter and ocean acidification to explain the slow recovery, but neither explains the lag between Southern and Northern Hemispheres.

Trace metal poisoning, on the other hand, would have been severe near the impact in the Northern Hemisphere. When the high temperature debris from the impact hit the water, copper, chromium, aluminum, mercury and lead would have dissolved into the seawater at likely lethal levels for plankton.

Iron, zinc and manganese—normally micronutrients—would reach harmful levels shortly after the impact. Other metal sources might be acid-rain leached soils or the effects of wildfires. Metals like these can inhibit reproduction or shell formation.

The toxic metals probably exceeded the ability of organic compounds to bind them and remove them from the system. Because nannoplankton are the base of the food chain, larger organisms concentrate any metals found in nannoplankton making the metal poisoning more effective. With the toxic metals remaining in the oceans and the lack of sunlight, the length of time for recovery might increase.

“We still do not really know why some things die out, while others hang on by a shoestring and eventually recover,” said Bralower.

NASA Exobiology supported this research and drilling samples came from the National Science Foundations Integrated Ocean Drilling Program. Researchers from Penn State and Florida State University contributed to the work.