For those of you wanting to get SLI somewhat working (still flickers a bit), try this:"The problem appears on sli rig only but there is a solution!
It solve the combined test problem on sli setup too:

-download nvidia inspector
-click on the button near the driver name
-it open a new screen
-in the first group of keys modify the Sli compatibility bits(DX10) from 0X00000000 to 0X008000F5
-apply change
-run your bench as usual

Just a heads up. While nobody here has done this yet (and KUDOS to everybody for being honest!), there is already a well known MASSIVE cheat for 3Dmark11 and Radeon 5x00 cards. Reverting to Cat 10.5 can inflate scores far beyond realistic. There's some question if the scene is being even rendered correctly, though it completely appears to be doing so.

Only recent Cat drivers from during or since 3Dmark 11's launch should be allowed to post scores. Cat 10.5 and before should be suspect.

Note shane_p's score jump. He posted an 8600 score peaked out on Cat 10.11, but then dropped driver version to Cat 10.5 and score jumped to 12000. 3400 points for a driver roll back to pre-3DM11 existing version? That's MEGA fishy. eva2000 goes on to do the same thing, netting a score of 15K+!!!

These scores are bogus until Cat 10.5 can be proven to be fully rendering everything correctly. For reference, Catalyst 10.5 is NOT approved by Futuremark for submission to the leaderboards.

Example of shane_p's score and warning indicating driver version not approved.

Just a heads up. While nobody here has done this yet (and KUDOS to everybody for being honest!), there is already a well known MASSIVE cheat for 3Dmark11 and Radeon 5x00 cards. Reverting to Cat 10.5 can inflate scores far beyond realistic. There's some question if the scene is being even rendered correctly, though it completely appears to be doing so.

Only recent Cat drivers from during or since 3Dmark 11's launch should be allowed to post scores. Cat 10.5 and before should be suspect.

Note shane_p's score jump. He posted an 8600 score peaked out on Cat 10.11, but then dropped driver version to Cat 10.5 and score jumped to 12000. 3400 points for a driver roll back to pre-3DM11 existing version? That's MEGA fishy. eva2000 goes on to do the same thing, netting a score of 15K+!!!

These scores are bogus until Cat 10.5 can be proven to be fully rendering everything correctly. For reference, Catalyst 10.5 is NOT approved by Futuremark for submission to the leaderboards.

There are several members that need to update drivers and until then scores will be pulled. I am not saying you are hacking but in order to maintain a proper list you must run @ least Catalyst 10.10 and above for ati and 260.99 and above for nvidia

Many, many people have been sticking to 10.5's due to CrossFire reasons so most likely they haven't done anything suspicious. That being said 10.5's and 3DMark 11 can't go together to keep things on an even keel.

Boy who cried wolf...quick run with 10.5 shows no quirks and runs normal. FM driver status approved. This bench truely is flawed tho...look at the disparity between ATI and Nvidia that no one addresses.
Not having a FM link from the beginning was a flaw as well. Now to delegate a large portion of perfectly good drivers as illegal is the answer?http://3dmark.com/3dm11/200182

Boy who cried wolf...quick run with 10.5 shows no quirks and runs normal. FM driver status approved. This bench truely is flawed tho...look at the disparity between ATI and Nvidia that no one addresses.
Not having a FM link from the beginning was a flaw as well. Now to delegate a large portion of perfectly good drivers as illegal is the answer?http://3dmark.com/3dm11/200182

well, see, there is this issue with the software info of AMD's drivers not updating properly in the older versions, remember?

Click to expand...

Not true, the links I showed clearly showed the older versions displaying their version number correctly in GPUz. The pics I showed prove that. That was a downgraded driver from 10.11 to 10.5, and it showed up fine in GPUz.

Ok I ran this on the latest drivers 10.12 and this is what I have so far . One would think with all the adds in this benchmark they could offer it up for free with out offering up a basic edition free ! MSI and antec sure got screen time there wounder how much they payed ! My cards are in CF and GPU-Z doesn't show this .