ECO ON TRANSLATION.

The Guardian has an excerpt from Umberto Eco’s new book Mouse or Rat? Translation as Negotiation; I heartily agree with the opening sentence, “I frequently feel irritated when I read essays on the theory of translation that, even though brilliant and perceptive, do not provide enough examples,” and I am pleased that most of the extract is taken up with the proper use in translations of the Italian word topo, which can mean both ‘mouse’ and ‘rat.’ The link comes via the always interesting Open Brackets, whose entry Echo goes on to quote various reviews of the new Proust translation, finishing up with a hilariously snide comment by Alain de Botton and a nicely dry retort by Gail (the blogatrice).

Comments

In Taiwan I found that squirrels are called “pine rats” in Chinese (“song-shu”). It’s hard to argue with, except that squirrels don’t have a reputation for nastiness.
To make it more confusing, I have been afflicted with a “bushy-tailed wood rat” or packrat, which is in between the two — half-nasty, with a somewhat, but not very bushy tail. He had rather good taste — he gnawed seriously on my New Directions version of Eugenio Montale.

Language Hat: I’m curious what you thought of Douglas Hofstadter’s book on translation, Le Ton Beau de Marot which came out a few years back. I actually had a class or two with Hofstadter back at the time he was writing that book and his translation of Eugene Onegin – definitely an interesting experience to talk with him about those issues as he tackled Pushkin.

I haven’t read the book, I’m afraid. I read and loved Godel Escher Bach, and I looked at this one in the bookstore, but as interesting as I’m sure I’d find many of his points, I don’t get the feeling he understands what makes poetry poetry, and I’m afraid reading his playful take on something I take extremely seriously would irritate me. I do want to take a longer look at it at some point, though.

Something Eco doesn’t mention, in this extract at least, is how this impacts on translation for business clients – specialy when the client has an office in the country where the translation is being targeted at….
You can always be sure someone in the office will complain, loudly, that you have not produced a literal word-for-word translation, and point out that a word used in an equivalent expression “is not in the original!”.

My favorite business-translation story: a pharmaceutical piece being turned into Spanish contained the phrase “Christmas disease” (which is named for a Mr. Christmas). It came out as “enfermedad de Navidad.” Gave me a good laugh.
(Incidentally, in Chile and Peru ‘Christmas’ is apparently Pascua, which elsewhere means ‘Easter.’ I wonder how that happened?)

I have to admit, I’m (almost) always disappointed to read books about translation–even Kelly’s much-cited “True Interpreter” proved to boil down to just another rehash of literal vs. idiomatic rendering. No matter how much you cut the pie, theorists don’t seem to get beyond this fundamental divide… another much-cited example is Eugene Nida’s ‘dynamic / formal equivalence’ distinction, which is much the same as far as I can tell. The best book by far on translation that I’ve read, meanwhile, remains Steiner’s “After Babel”. Any thoughts on that one, Hat?

And you can support my book habit without even spending money on me by following my Amazon links to do your shopping (if, of course, you like shopping on Amazon); I get a small percentage of every dollar spent while someone is following my referral links, and every month I get a gift certificate that allows me to buy a few books (or, if someone has bought a big-ticket item, even more). You will not only get your purchases, you will get my blessings and a karmic boost!

Favorite rave review, by Teju Cole:
"Evidence that the internet is not as idiotic as it often looks. This site is called Language Hat and it deals with many issues of a linguistic flavor. It's a beacon of attentiveness and crisp thinking, and an excellent substitute for the daily news."

From "commonbeauty"

(Cole's blog circa 2003)

All comments are copyright their original posters. Only messages signed "languagehat" are property of and attributable to languagehat.com. All other messages and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily state or reflect those of languagehat.com. Languagehat.com does not endorse any potential defamatory opinions of readers, and readers should post opinions regarding third parties at their own risk. Languagehat.com reserves the right to alter or delete any questionable material posted on this site.