On niedziela, 16 stycznia 2011 o 15:09:32 Simon Arlott wrote:> [ 1.666706] forcedeth 0000:00:08.0: ifname eth0, PHY OUI 0x5043 @ 16,> addr 00:e0:81:4d:2b:ec [ 1.666767] forcedeth 0000:00:08.0: highdma csum> vlan pwrctl mgmt gbit lnktim msi desc-v3> > I have eth0 and eth0.3840 which works until I add eth0 to a bridge.> While eth0 is in a bridge (the bridge device is up), eth0.3840 is unable> to receive packets. Using tcpdump on eth0 shows the packets being> received with a VLAN tag but they don't appear on eth0.3840. They appear> with the VLAN tag on the bridge interface.> > If I remove eth0 from the bridge, eth0.3840 starts working again. It> still works if eth0.3840 is part of a bridge but eth0 isn't (the device> is in promiscuous mode). I've only tested with broadcast traffic.> > This works with 2.6.36.> > git bisect produces 3701e51382a026cba10c60b03efabe534fba4ca4 as the> first bad commit.> > The behaviour of drivers/net/forcedeth.c nv_rx_process_optimized looks> ok - vlan_gro_receive and napi_gro_receive are called correctly. (The> likely(!np->vlangrp) looks odd as it'll always be false if vlans are in> use).