Advertisements

AntenaHouse provides a commercial FO processor supporting much more
than Apache FOP. The files from AntennaHouse are probably intended to
show the features their processor provide so it is understandable that
a processor like Apache FOP may not render them correctly. You may
eventually try with the FOP 0.92 beta and see if you get better
results:http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html#FOP+0.92+beta

Advertisements

George Bina wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> AntenaHouse provides a commercial FO processor supporting much more
> than Apache FOP. The files from AntennaHouse are probably intended to
> show the features their processor provide so it is understandable that
> a processor like Apache FOP may not render them correctly. You may
> eventually try with the FOP 0.92 beta and see if you get better
> results:
> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html#FOP+0.92+beta

Makes perfect sense. Since this was more for test, I'll simply avoid
the few tags Apache FOP cannot handle.

Share This Page

Welcome to The Coding Forums!

Welcome to the Coding Forums, the place to chat about anything related to programming and coding languages.

Please join our friendly community by clicking the button below - it only takes a few seconds and is totally free. You'll be able to ask questions about coding or chat with the community and help others.
Sign up now!