Monthly Archives: January 2009

Thank you for your patienceÂ during the recent Green Delaware site outage.Â In the near future at least, this WordPress blog will be our main online presence.Â The “old” website will be available “soon” and will remain online indefinitely as an archive of over 630 Alerts and other items.

One of the greatest challenges facing Governor Markell gets little public attention: Restoring an independent judiciary is critical to providing the checks and balances that have sometimes been lacking in this State.Â Continue reading →

The people of Delaware can never thank Gov. Peterson for the lifetime of work he has given in regards to the environment.

There has not been a more unrepentant polluter in this state than DuPont.

Remember this is the company that fought vigorously against the Coastal Zone Act that Gov. Peterson championed. This is the company that has polluted the Edgemoor area with huge tailing piles, laced with dioxin.

They have successfully managed to fight off attempts to remove this blight. They attempted to further poison the Delaware River by treating nerve gas at their facility.

DuPont will have input on every aspect of how the center presents its information. The Delaware Nature Society will staff the center and in effect will work hand in glove with DuPont, since they were formed by members of the du Pont family.

I was one of the volunteers who worked on the first cleanup of the wildlife area and DuPont was not there and does not care about the environment. This is sad commentary on how a company with influence can cover over the good work of many.

Matthew F. Del Pizzo, Townsend

Our sources tell us the DuPont Company is spending $500,000 each on three “DuPont” nature centers on or near the Delaware River.Â This is part of DuPont’s “Clear into the Future” campaign ( http://www.clearintothefuture.com/ ) to “preserve and enhance the beauty and integrity of the Delaware Estuary for generations to come.”

One of these is already in operation ( http://www.dupontnaturecenter.org/) and is operated by the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC).Â Sometime the DNREC seems like a de facto DuPont subsidiary.Â Â (At other times, not nearly often enough, the DNREC has stood up to DuPont.)

Another, the “DuPont Environmental Education Center” is being set up on the Christina River in Wilmington as part of the “Russell W. Peterson Urban Wildlife Refuge.”Â It will be run by the “Delaware Nature Society,” ( http://www.delawarenaturesociety.org/jobs.html) also closely tied to the DuPont Company and sometimes called the “DuPont Nature Society.”)

We haven’t been able to confirm anything about the rumored one in New Jersey.

Why is DuPont spending this money to greenwash itself?

Here are DuPont’s own reported figures for the amount of “Toxic Release Inventory” chemicals it has dumped into the Delaware river over the last ten years from just one site, Chambers Works opposite New Castle.Â These reports include only a selected list of some of the very worst chemicals around.Â (Look at the data yourself here:Â http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/tris_control.tris_print?tris_id=08023DPNTCRT130 )

In 1997, a total of 4,378,209 pounds of “toxic” pollutants were reported dumped into the Delaware. (Chemicals listed on the “Toxic Release Inventory” are only a small fraction of the total harmful pollutants dumped.). Of these, 3,086,517 pounds, or 70 percent, came from DuPont’s Chambers Works, the proposed site of the VX waste dumping. [Note:Â this number differs slightly from the number in the table above.]

The next highest discharger was another DuPont plant, Repauno, in Gibbstown, NJ, at 410,074 pounds. These two DuPont sites discharged 80 percent of the total toxics reported dumped in the entire Delaware River. In that year Chambers works was the largest discharger of toxic metals and reproductive toxins. ( http://www.newhopepa.com/DelawareRiver/currentissues_3.htm)

According to the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), “More reproductive toxins, 220,000 pounds between 1992 and 1996, were dumped in the Delaware River than any other body of water in the U.S.” Of this amount, “Dupont Chambers Works in Deepwater, NJ dumped more reproductive toxins into the nation’s waters than any other facility: 210,000 pounds.” Thus, over this period over 95 percent were dumped by DuPont. ( http://www.pirg.org/reports/enviro/waters98/page1.htm)

The Wilmington project is even more egregious.Â The News Journal Reports: “Once the $16 million project is complete, Riverfront visitors, community groups and students will have access from the Riverwalk to the center and will be able to view the Christina River, the adjacent marsh and the variety of wildlife in the preserve.”

That’s not all of course:

DuPont proudly claims: “Science and education are two pillars of Clear into the Future. The initiative has enlisted Professor Green, a robot who teaches children about the importance of estuary ecosystems. By year’s end, â€œProfessor Gâ€ will have visited about 60 elementary school assemblies in Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.Â Clear into the Future also provides universities with research assistance and fellowships.”

“Itâ€™s helping University of Delaware researchers develop an alternative to horseshoe crabs, a bait used by eel and conch fishermen.”

The DNREC took the bribe and gave it to Nancy Targett at the University of Delaware.

DuPont ha been very clever:Â By getting the public to pay for the land and buildings, and itself paying for the exhibits, DuPont is controlling the message.Â Pretty pictures of horseshoe crabs and fish divert attention from what DuPont is actually doing to the river and the creatures trying to survive in it.

The DNREC people running the “DuPont Nature Center” have good intentions.Â With inadequate state funding it is not surprising, maybe, that they are willing to take money from wherever they can get it.Â But is letting our worst polluters influence environmental regulators this way worth the price?

Citizens for Clean Power vs DNREC vs NRG’s Indian River Generating Station

“On his way out the door, [DNREC Secretary] John Hughes took care of NRG again.”— Citizens for Clean Power

“One way to avoid outrage and ugly surprises is to put all proposed settlements up for public comment for 30 days.Â This has long been required in federal court settlements.”— Alan Muller, Green Delaware Continue reading →