Monday, January 15, 2007

Learning digital photography

A few weeks ago I asked for pointers to help get up to speed on digital photography. Now that I have a “real” camera (with each day, I find yet another incredible feature of my D50; if you’re in the market for a digital SLR, you could do much, much worse), I’m really eager to learn how to take photographs instead of snapshots. It’s been so long since I’ve had to think about things like f/stops, ISO settings, shutter speeds, etc., that I found myself starting from scratch.

In addition to the camera, I got a great DVD: Introduction to the Nikon D50 Digital SLR. It’s both a terrific intro to the camera – which, it should be said, isn’t that difficult to learn once you get past the overwhelming notion of multiple dials, lots of buttons, and a dozen or more decisions you can make with each shot – and a good primer on basic photograph techniques. But it was Ernie who recommended The Digital Photography Book by Scott Kelby, and wow, am I glad I listened. The book is as close to perfect as you’ll find: it’s not a treatise on photography; as Kelby explains, it’s as if you and he are out on a photo shoot, and you want to know how to do something. He won’t go into a long dissertation on depth of field, he’ll tell you to get low to the ground, set the f/stop at 2.8 and zoom in on the flower so that everything behind the flower is blurry, while the flower is “tack sharp”. Or he’ll tell you to get 6-8 feet away from the person, set the f/stop at 11, and go for an uncomplicated background out of direct sunlight to get a great portrait. And he’ll beat you within an inch of your life if you don’t buy a tripod. (OK, not quite that severe. But he makes it clear that if you dump a ton of dough on a camera and don’t get a decent tripod, you’re wasting your time and your money.)

What elevates the book from a good tutorial to an essential companion (thankfully, it fits quite nicely in my Tamrac Adventure Messenger 4 DSLR Camera Bag!) is that Kelby’s writing is crisp, he’s hilarious (I actually laughed out loud several times over the weekend), and his advice is superb. I can’t think of another “how to” book that made me as excited to jump in with both feet as Kelby’s book did.

One recommendation from Scott that I followed last night: downloading and installing Adobe Photoshop Elements 5.0 (trial download should be available here). Nikon ships a decent photo organizing/editing suite called Picture Project with its cameras, but I found the editing capabilities limited. After just a couple hours banging around Photoshop Elements, I found it to be a very capable editor with an elegant interface and some sophisticated tools well beyond my current abilities. The major missing feature (and I’m hardly alone in identifying this): no Flickr integration. Given that PE supports tagging, geo-location markup, sets, and pretty much the same features that Flickr supports, getting the two to talk to each other ought to be a no-brainer.

7 comments:

Scott K. will also thrash you if you don't switch to using the AdobeRGB color space, but you can ignore him there - but you have to do your homework, because the right answer is to find out what color space your printer expects and use that. For example, most of my prints come from SmugMug's printers or Wolfe Camera's. They're perfectly happy with (and in fact prefer) sRGB. Please read through http://www.smugmug.com/help/srgb-versus-adobe-rgb-1998 for more info.

as far as color space, I would suggest using the AdobeRGB color space. It is larger than the sRGB which is used by the web. While quoting me on may get you into hot water, once you are in a smaller color space, going back to a bigger one will not give you any thing other than what was available in the smaller space. Of more importance when you get to the point of printing pictures, (and you will) is to have a properly profiled monitor. You need hardware to do this.

Rick, I believe that both will display correctly on most web browsers, but I'm not *sure* about it. I know my sRGB images do. If I remember correctly, so did my AdobeRGB images when I was using that (based on Scott's advice in this book), but people who ordered prints complained that their kids' faces were green! Based on the help page I mentioned the other day, I switched back to sRGB and everything's been fine since. Since most non-geeks still want their pictures on paper, I make sure they'll get what'll look good. It's important to keep grandma happy with the front of her refridgerator :-)