Good Morning!

A nude Britney Spears on a bearskin rug while giving birth to her firstborn marks a ‘first’ for Pro-Life. Dedication of the life-sized statue celebrates the recent birth of Spears’ baby boy, Sean, and applauds her decision of placing family before career. “A superstar at Britney’s young age having a child is rare in today’s celebrity culture. This dedication honors Britney for the rarity of her choice and bravery of her decision,” said gallery co-director, Lincoln Capla. The dedication includes materials provided by Manhattan Right To Life Committee.

“Monument to Pro-Life: The Birth of Sean Preston,” believed Pro-Life’s first monument to the ‘act of giving birth,’ is purportedly an idealized depiction of Britney in delivery. Natural aspects of Spears’ pregnancy, like lactiferous breasts and protruding naval, compliment a posterior view that depicts widened hips for birthing and reveals the crowning of baby Sean’s head.

I’m sorry, that is something I personally just don’t need to see. So naturally, I thought I would share.

I’m sorry – I don’t usually respond to these things but I have to say that this statue is RIDICULOUS considering the fact that Britney had a “planned C-section” because she didn’t want to go through LABOR. I doubt at any time she was ever in this position! Spoiled celebs make me sick!

I have to say, I’m surprised that such a “moral” group as a pro-life one would glorify a statue of a woman in a pornographic pose. I know, I know, it’s supposed to be her in childbirth, but that’s NOT the first thing most people will think when they see this…

plus, chicki, you’re EXACTLY right! She had a friggin’ c-section! why don’t they show her on her back with her pelvic area surgically opened? I guess they weren’t going for realism.

Oh, this is so wrong and freaking weird! I doesn’t even LOOK like Britney. I actually wanted to see the crowning head parts, just for the traiwreck factor. Britney had a c-section, it’s not like she actually experienced real labor. Birth is soooo icky-poo! And of course she put family before her career, she can afford it! It’s not like she’s poor and has to get back to her cashier job at Walmart. This is yet another pathetic display of putting a celebrity who doesn’t deserve it on a pedestal. If she’s such a “family” girl, why did she hop into bed with a guy who dumped his baby and his PREGNANT girlfriend. Hypocrite. I can’t wait for K-Fed to get caught banging another girl.

Spears ‘putting family before career’ had absolutely nothing to do with the ‘sanctity of life’, but everything to do with the crippling insecurity that prompted her to make something that would love her always… no matter what. That, and the white trash flowing through her veins.

as for k-fed banging another girl, it’s only a matter of time before he gets caught. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again…I firmly believe that he cheats on her every chance he gets. We just have to wait for him to get caught.

just had breakfast before looking at this – i want to barf. it doesn’t even look like her. she had a c-section. and no one gives birth on a bear skin rug with their butt in the air like that. pro-lifers: get a life!

Doesn’t even look like her. Yes, pregnant women are beautiful but this is verging on being pornographic and just disgusts me. Wish it wasn’t her. It’s also impossible to give birth in the position she is in.

She only put her family first after she realized her career had crashed and burned. She needed some way to draw the attention to herself that she can’t live without and probably thinks is adoration, so she decided to get pregnant. It was all a big publicity stunt, in my opinion. She’s desparate to stay in the public eye, even if it means getting pregnant again two months after having SP or staying married to an absolute creep. Hey, the creep is so despised that even that negative attention is at least attention.

And women may crouch on all fours to ease contraction pains while in labor, but once the baby is crowning that’s all gone out the door. If the artist wanted to depict a naturalistic or non-traditional, “Earth mother” type of childbirth pose, he’d have pictured her squatting. Not at all glamorous. This sculptor is sick.

Don’t understand how this girl can be idolized (in the most literal sense) at all…

Whoever made this absurd statue (not to mention weirdly inaccurate) is obviously playing an elaborate prank, with the pretense that Britney cares about family, and had her son for any reason other than assuaging her hormones (much the same reason she married her trash husband).

Either that, or the artist is obscenely dumb and actually BELIEVES any of this. In which case, I would like a moment of silence to honor his dead brain cells.

“Pro-Lifers are all fucktards.”

Brilliant argument. Don’t worry, you are a wonderful argument for abortion…

What piece o’ f#ck apprently thinks women in birth arch their backs, poise their hips doggie style, and beg to take it from behind on a bear skin rug???

Wait- its the ProLifers, of course! Instead of advocating brirth control so that people like poor-white-trash Brit and KFed stop literally thinning the gene pool in front of our eyes, they pay some f#cktard to use play-dough and his pervy imagination and put shit like this in the public domain…

The good news is, I’m sure this will convince many a 14 year old knocked up girls to keep their babies. I mean, didn’t Nancy Reagan’s ‘Just Say No’ campaign completely squalch the Columbian coke cartels in the 80′s? Oh, wait…

Wow! What a realistic rendering of the act of childbirth! I for one found it to be quite helpful when I had my baby to lift my pelvis AWAY from gravity, it made it so much easier to push…yeah..and I also had an extremely serene expression on my face that in no way indicated the presence of pain.

Only a dimwit pervert Republican pro-lifer MAN would have come up with such a ridiculous thing as that sculpture

yes, people. it is a joke. look at it. read the statement. its suppossed to be ironic.
some people actually do give birth in this position, but its not standard.
no, it doesnt look like her at all.
no, its not involved with a bunch of red neck bible thumping homophobic mysoginist racists pro lifers or whatever else people keep rambling about when they hear the phrase “pro life”
so.
get
over
it

This is another piece of crap from the Theater of The Absurd’s sculpture division. I am so glad you folks see it for what is is – sculptural sewage! Anything and everything passes for “art” these days. The scary thing is that millions of folks will view this trash and will gasp in awe and wonderment so not to be considered un-hip and unsophisticated.

Actually, I think Kat is right. When she said it was a joke I went back and reread the whole press release on it, and then looked at the other featured “artists” on the website, then looked at the bio for the artists who formed the gallery. They were rejects from another gallery that wouldn’t show their art, so they formed their own gallery. After looking at it all, and considering how awful the artists are that are featured on their site, I have to think it’s all tongue in cheek–Britney and all.

You people are all illiterate dolts. The sculpture is hilarious and ironic. It doesn’t look like her? Who cares. It is a comment on idolatry, the ideal form, and the ridiculousness of celebrity birth. Take some night classes you idiots.

First of all, she CHOSE to have a c-section to avoid the pain of a vaginal delivery. (what a moron!) Second, I doubt she made a conscious choice to get pregnant with that greasy, nasty, walking disease-ridden ho-bag! He just walks around spraying his DNA around and if you happen to be unlucky enough to be in its path, blammo, devil-spawn! People, Please!

So just because i’m a pro-lifer means I need to get a life? I beg to differ for the sole reason being that, yes, everybody is entitled to their opinions, but just because you belive differently than I doesn’t mean that I am a bad person nor do I need to get a life. No, I do not support anything to do with abortions but I also don’t get defiant, rude and crude about such things either. So please don’t go assuming that all pro-lifers are that bad, thanks :-D By the way, yes, I do strongly agree that the statue of Britney rather nausiating, lol. She has it easy and always had from the sounds of it, it would be kinda nice if she didn’t make the REAL hard working, full-time not so rich parents look bad. But that’s just my opinion, ya know :-)

Well, when I first saw the statue, I thought that it looked nothing like Britney Spears. Then I looked at the pose of the statue ,and I thought that it looked more like a sexual pose than a birthing pose…I should know, I have had six kids, all natural, and I never got into that pose for birthing. I am not here to put anyone down or criticize. The statue is just not accurately labeled.

A friend of mine who actually frames at CKFA gallery got to help move the statue into the gallery! He told me that the backside has a small amount of fecal matter coming out(which is natural at birth!) SICK!!!! Now that is some realism for you!! He said there will be huge controvery and once the pictures are going to come out! He said it opens Apr 7. So stayed tuned!!!!

Is it just me or was this artist smoking crack when he created this piece of crap. First off,it looks nothing like Britney Spears , Secondly, who gives birth with their ass in the air like that in the nude!! Thats pretty far fetched if you ask me!