I'm working on a handwriting font with pretty nice descenders and I've got a problem/dilemma.
(It obviously still needs a lot of work, and please ignore the typo's - I was typing with half the characters still missing )

The descenders in the original writing overlap with the line of text below - resulting in them being cut off in pretty much every application.
1

With adjusted (Metrics - calculate) descender heights it looks like this
2

Is there a way to make the "overflow" visible in, say, Word? (Don't think so, but doesn't hurt to ask here )
What is common practice - leave them clipped since they will print out, or go for option 2?

@ Dick Pape: I would want the clipped version, since the original handwriting overlaps - as in the loop of the g runs through the letters on the sentence below - and thus clipped would resemble the handwriting of the person more closely than when I would adjust the descender height..

Like I said this font still needs a lot of work, so yes, eventually I will adjust the space width... and the connections, and I have to remove all bumps from teh scanning and......
In short I've only imported a few characters so far, and done nothing else yet.

Just wanted to know - since it doesn't seem like making the clipped descenders visible is an option - what the common practice was.
Keep it clipped so that printed (clipped DOES show then) it looks more like the handwriting, or unclip/adjust the space, thus making everything visible on the screen, but compromising on the resemblance to the handwriting.

Go for option 2, but used fixed line-spacing or proportional line-spacing in your Word-processor. Below, I used 80% leading (16 point leading on 20 point font size) just to exaggerate the effect. Normally I would use at least 120% leading with this font.

You can reduce the line-spacing until you get some collisions if you want, but the letter forms won't be clipped.

Default leading (single line spacing) for this font is 150% of point size. I usually aim for 120%, but the Gothic Drop Caps don't permit that here. With such tight leading I had to add a space before the third line to avoid an ugly collision.

It reminds me of a joke we used to play on the new Boy Scouts at camp back in 1945.

To discover the Secret Of the Three Mysterious Cities of the East,
All of the newcomers would kneel facing east and while bowing, repeat the name of the next city in each position
(hands stretched overhead, bowed halfway down, hands touching the ground) until the Mystery was reveled to them.

The names of the cities are: Owa, Tigu, and Siam (Oh, what a goose I am).

You can edit a paragraph style in Word so that it uses proportional spacing of 120% or 110% and save that style in your Normal.dot template for use with your font. I wouldn't recommend going down to 100% spacing. It looks too cramped.

Can you send me the font? If you calculated the metrics it shouldn't get clipped. Try Font Properties and double-click on Y-Max and see if that glyph crosses the WinAscent. If it does, try Metrics, Calculate, Maximum instead of Default.

I reduced the default line-spacing for your font slightly by running the validation wizard, from Font, Validate. This removed off-curve extremes and allows the WinDescent to move up to touch the bottom of the glyphs after calculating the metrics again. This might cure the clipping problems.

I don't use Word. Probably there is an option for "Multiple" line-spacing that can be set to less than one. In OpenOffice 2.3.1 the minimum for proportional line-spacing that works is 55% which is illustrated below: