Easily I agree but I about the post
should acquire more info then it has.

It's the third in a series. Before there was:

I will not acquiesce in on it. I over
precise post. Expressly the title
attracted me to be familiar with the
sound story.

and before that

Your blog keeps getting better and
better! Your older articles are not as
good as newer ones you have a lot more
creativity and originality now keep it
up!

It is obviously computer-generated (well, not this last one). The comments are from Anonymous, so they're not trying to legitimate a user on Blogger. Is this a spam attack? What might its goal be? Or are they just testing my blog to see if I reject or not? Does this kind of "attack" have a name?

Are you sure this is all? Maybe the Blogger software removed the links from the text, and did the original post link to other sites?
–
ArjanJan 21 '10 at 11:43

2

Here is today's world: you can't even trust compliments, they're related to spam as well ;)
–
GnoupiJan 21 '10 at 13:30

@Gnoupi, I never trust compliments that don't say anything SPECIFIC at all. On my blog, when there have been compliments, they've talked about WHAT they were complimenting. "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..."
–
YarJan 21 '10 at 15:00

@Arjan van Bentem, yes, you may be right. I'll have to try spamming myself to see what it filters.
–
YarJan 21 '10 at 15:01

Cool, thanks for that. @Arjan van Bentem, I will keep you posted, but as I reject those messages, I think they will stop. I've noticed the same thing with my catch-all on my google-apps domains, too. Flurries of activities followed by nothing.
–
YarJan 21 '10 at 15:02

My assumption has always been that this checks for the level of moderation in your comments. If you leave a clearly computer-generated post like this online, you're probably not heavily moderating your comments, and a quick Google search would allow the spammer to find you again to post some real spam.

+1 but not for the China part, could be from anyplace non-English. But: I posted them in order from most to least-recent. I think they were trying native, and then less native texts to see how permissive the site is... or something? Anyway, nice going on googling the phrases!
–
YarJan 21 '10 at 15:05