To anyone asserting CCTV footage of the GRU agents in the Salisbury attack has been classified, feel free to post up your credible source saying who classified it and what the level of classification is.
You won't post a credible source as you are making things up, but it's polite to give you the opportunity to make yourself look stupid

War Hero

Genuine question #184461. From what I have gleaned from your posts* am I correct that you contend that Agents of the British state attempted to murder the Skripals in order to deflect attention away from investigations into Trumps election.

*obviously I haven’t read the interminable screeds of cut and paste as life is too short.

"No sprinkles. For every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you." Stewie Griffin

LE

Curious: would that be the same Sergei Leonidovich Magnitsky who died whilst being held in a Moscow prison, 7 days prior to the expiration of the 1-year term during which he could be legally held without trial?

Tell me this-how then, given the fact that Browder had no direct access to Magnitsky, can he be held culpable in his death? Or is the Russian judicial system so riddled with graft that prison and prison medical staff can be so easily bribed so as to facilitate the murder of a prisoner?

There are no provisions in the Chemical Weapons Convention which required the UK to provide the Russian Federation with samples of the chemical agent used in the Salisbury attack. Russia will, however, have been provided in the confidential OPCW report with details of the chemical structure involved.

Considering one of those is a media article with “may have” and one is the Chief Constable making an official statement including that he had personally watched body cam footage which would show that Nick Bailey has been infected there, then surely you have been told where he was infected.

There are of course assumptions based on available information, with the Chief Constable having access to information not in the public domain there’s a pretty good chance that he has seen Nick touch the area of the door with the most contamination and subsequently become ill from novichock poisoning

LE

There are no provisions in the Chemical Weapons Convention which required the UK to provide the Russian Federation with samples of the chemical agent used in the Salisbury attack. Russia will, however, have been provided in the confidential OPCW report with details of the chemical structure involved.

LE

Considering one of those is a media article with “may have” and one is the Chief Constable making an official statement including that he had personally watched body cam footage which would show that Nick Bailey has been infected there, then surely you have been told where he was infected.

There are of course assumptions based on available information, with the Chief Constable having access to information not in the public domain there’s a pretty good chance that he has seen Nick touch the area of the door with the most contamination and subsequently become ill from novichock poisoning

LE

The onus is still on the accuser.
They don't seem to be doing to well do they?
Wasn't the int/proof/evidence-in back in March?
Many MPs and other monkeys said it was.

Is that the best you can do?
Cry cultural misappropriation??

I'm sure the hierarchy at 77X are more than qualified to dig around on FB and post pro-govt rhetoric on sites like this but giving a bunch of STABs, medical downgrades and signalmen the same X number as the legend-like Chindits made me laugh.
Most of the new 77X have never been on ops, been shot at or even fired a shot in anger.

Giving the Clinthe to a bunch of shiny-arsed REMFs is similar to when the AGC got the green lid to wear.

Anyhoo, back to the proof that I asked for before you tried to act like some social justice warrior?

Anything evidential will do until we can go over tonight's outing with DSB,

LE

What has been presented in public is a case built on secret administrative processes and secret warrants signed by an anonymous prosecutor.
The Prime Minister (and other assorted monkeys) have provided one interpretation of the evidence.

The burden of proof in criminal cases is on the Crown; so far the Prime Minister (and other assorted monkeys) have avoided it.

National security/ OSA etc is the panacea to awkward questions from concerned taxpayers.

The judicial test, if there ever will be one, would require the police and prosecutors to answer questions about the reasonableness of their evidence.The standard required in British law for conviction of the criminal offences alleged in this case is proof beyond reasonable doubt.

Even trial in absentia will require evidence of which there is none.

Lucky this will never get to trial,eh?

You still have no evidence against Ru do you?
Just like uk plod, gov,int.

What a cluster.
They couldn't arrange a session in a brewery,

Maybe we should let the Turks come and run the investigation?
They released everything vs the Saudis straight away.
Cut and dried.
No question.

Some massive double-standards at play but then again KSA has a massive wallet and there's a lucrative reciprocal agreement at play plus those pesky Yemeni civilians won't kill themselves, will they?

LE

I'll be here tomorrow and the day after... there's no rush, now is there?

I'm sure the state-broadcaster's efforts will be as loaded as their last effort but that's only to be expected.

Panorama, BBC1 tonight.
The Salisbury poisonings with an interview with DS Bailey.

We can be sure there'll be nothing in DS Bailey's interview that will create any problems for the official narrative in the way the interviews with the medical staff at Salisbury A&E created such extreme problems in explaining the Skripals' "remarkable" survival after >36hrs with no proper treatment.

Unfortunately, its premise is that a Russian "hit squad" was to blame and asks Russian people why their state wanted Skripal dead. All about reinforcing the government line.

Produced and directed by the BBC's Mike Rudin.
That's a guarantee it will not be balanced in any meaningful way or contain any genuinely investigative journalism.