debinlcfl

All the idiot got was a slap on the wrist. These body scanners are comparable to the holocaust victims being forced to strip naked before they were lead into the gas chambers. It's degradation and a violation of our human rights.

Incident proves once again that detailed images of genitals are visible – and these are the people who will be leering over your naked children

Paul Joseph WatsonPrison Planet.comWednesday, March 24, 2010

Outrage was growing today over the abuse of naked airport body scanners after it was revealed that a Heathrow worker perved over a naked image of a female colleague after she passed through one of the devices, before commenting, “I love those gigantic tits”.

Jo Margetson, 29, reported John Laker, 25, to the police after she had entered the x-ray machine by mistake and Laker took the image before making lewd comments.

One of the most important aspects of this story which the media has completely failed to mention is the fact that, despite a barrage of propaganda on behalf of the government claiming that the images produced do not show sensitive areas of the body in detail, the fact that Laker was clearly able to distinguish Margetson’s breasts proves once again that the scanners do show crisp details of genitals and other sensitive body parts.

As we have exhaustively emphasized, the body scanners do allow airport workers to see intricate details of your body – penis length, breast size, implants, piercings, including crystal clear naked shots of your children. The fact that authorities initially lied and denied this was the case as part of the agenda to hastily install scanners after the staged Christmas bombing incident was clearly a case of mass public deception and one of the primary reasons why the scanners need to be removed now.

Action for Rights of Children warned that the scanners broke child porn laws in the UK after their widespread introduction, but the government refused to make an exception and now force all Brits who are asked to go through the scanners without the alternative option of a pat down. If travelers refuse then they are barred from flying, another complete violation of the basic human right to mobility.

“I can’t bear to think about the body scanner thing,” Margetson told the Sun last night, “”I’m totally traumatised. I’ve spoken to the police about it. I’m in too much of a state to go to work.”

Laker was given a formal warning for harassment by police and faces the sack.

“When privacy-invading machines are installed at our airports, abuses like this are inevitable,” said Barrister Alex Deane, director of Big Brother Watch. “We are disturbed to hear of this case, which will lead to greater calls for these scanners to be banned.”

“For every official caught ogling like this, there are plenty more eyeing up law-abiding travellers. These expensive machines are totally disproportionate.”

As we reported last month, Indian film star Shahrukh Khan claimed that Heathrow staff printed out and circulated an image of him taken by the naked body scanner. Heathrow denied the claim but Khan did not make a retraction and had no motive for inventing the story.

Airport security staff workers are among the least trustworthy people to operate these machines. These individuals are routinely caught abusing their authority for their own ego trip or sexual perversion.

As the video below illustrates, the fact that naked body scanner machines in the U.S. are manned by TSA thugs who are routinely caught abusing their power in treating the public like prison inmates only heightens the danger posed by the use abuse of the new devices.

All the idiot got was a slap on the wrist. These body scanners are comparable to the holocaust victims being forced to strip naked before they were lead into the gas chambers. It's degradation and a violation of our human rights.

Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

So wait... MS. TSA doesn't like naked pictures of her naked body be taken?

This is the Uk so the TSA does not figure into it.

Logged

“Good luck to him. I don’t blame him at all, but I justwish he had not hit me so hard. I know he had to protecthis property, and I probably would have done thesame thing in his position. This has certainly stoppedme committing any more crime.” - British burglar elaborating robbery

A lot of them are serious retards. The last time I flew at Heathrow, they were chatting to each other not really paying attention to anything and giggling like teenagers when some overweight man or woman had to bend over to remove/put on their shoes.

Logged

“Good luck to him. I don’t blame him at all, but I justwish he had not hit me so hard. I know he had to protecthis property, and I probably would have done thesame thing in his position. This has certainly stoppedme committing any more crime.” - British burglar elaborating robbery

“Good luck to him. I don’t blame him at all, but I justwish he had not hit me so hard. I know he had to protecthis property, and I probably would have done thesame thing in his position. This has certainly stoppedme committing any more crime.” - British burglar elaborating robbery

New threat to travellers from al-Qaeda 'keister bomb'(AFP/Getty Images)Al-Asiri, who used a mobile telephone to trigger the bomb, was ripped into 70 pieces in the August attack in Jeddah

Charles Bremner and Marie Tourres in Paris 12 CommentsRecommend? (6) Travellers in Europe could face intrusive airport security measures in response to the latest ploy by al-Qaeda — suicide bombers who carry high explosives inside their bodies, it emerged today.

French anti-terrorism chiefs are expected to recommend widening examinations already used to catch drug smugglers after President Sarkozy’s new domestic intelligence directorate (DCRI) learnt of an attack in Saudi Arabia in which the bomber detonated such a device in his rectum.

Al-Qaeda gave video publicity to its new method tested by Abdullah Hassan al-Asiri, a 23-year-old terrorist, who blew himself apart at a meeting in Jeddah in late August with Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, the Saudi anti-terrorism chief. The Prince was slightly injured in the blast, but al-Asiri, who used a mobile telephone to trigger the bomb, was ripped into 70 pieces, the DCRI report said.

Such a blast, though limited in force, could be catastrophic in a pressurised airliner, say experts. Counter-measures would be draconian. As well as taking off shoes and handing in liquids, passengers could be subjected to X-ray screening or be required to hand in all electronic devices because they could be used as detonators, police commanders told Le Figaro newspaper.

Related LinksOktoberfest security beefed up after threats FBI arrests three from 'al-Qaeda cell' Saudi prince escapes assassination attempt Full X-ray scans, which are used by customs officers for examining suspected drug smugglers, would cause huge disruptions for air travellers, said a senior Interior Ministry official. “It is unthinkable when you think about the freqency with which some people fly. The health risks would be too high,” he told Le Figaro.

The Ministry declined comment on possible new measures, which would be decided by Brice Hortefeux, the Interior Minister.

Experts have long expected terrorists to copy the technique of drug “mules” who cross frontiers with up to several pounds of narcotics in their body cavities. The weapon could be effective for assassination or possibly in the confined space of an airliner, they say.

“The hardest thing for the terrorists was to make a detonator and a way of setting it off. With advances in miniaturisation, they are getting close,” said Sebastien Mahé, an airport security expert with Brink’s France.

It would be possible, though difficult, to bring down an aircraft with such a device, he told The Times. “You would need a certain weight of explosive because the human body acts as quite a strong shock absorber.”

Some US experts are more worried. “The implications here are enormous,” Sandy Straus of the Florida-based Explosives Academy, said after the Jeddah blast. “If we see more of these attacks, this ultimately will cost society a huge legal, financial and emotional expense.”

Scott Stewart of Stratfor, a Texas-based global intelligence firm, said that an al-Qaeda-style “keister bomb”, as they are also known, could have “a catastrophic result if employed on an aircraft, especially if it were removed from the bomber’s body and placed in a strategic location on board the aircraft.”

Others have been warning against the risk of playing into al-Qaeda’s hands by raising the alarm. The Muslim extremists are still at the trial stage and they want to cause disruption with their threat, said Eric Andlauer, a French consultant on aviation security. “Everyone talked a lot about liquid explosives which have not caused one death, but drastic action was taken. This time, no one has for the moment been talking about this [Jeddah] attack. Perhaps there will not be a follow-up. I am not going to say what they should do to make their bomb more efficient. Terrorists read newspapers like everyone.”

Al-Qaeda has promised to put instructions on assembling and concealing such a device on the internet. In their video, released in early September, al-Asiri, one of Saudi Arabia’s most wanted suspects, shows off the metal cylinder and larger detonator which he carried to meet the Saudi minister, supposedly to repent.

He had travelled on the minister’s aircraft and spent 24 hours with his security gurds without being detected. He remained in posession of his telephone. The military-grade high explosive is believed to have been triggered by a text message, but the message source is not known. The explosion ripped a large hole in the floor but the attacker’s body was said to have absorbed much of the shock.

Experts differ on the effectiveness of security screening for internal explosives. Body scanners, which emit very low level radiation have been in use for the past two years at some airports but they do not show internal objects. Metal containers would easily appear on full X-ray machines.

Mr Mahé predicted that airports would eventually introduce “millimetric wave” scanners which look into into the body without radiation. “For the moment they will focus on the detonators and profiling [suspicious passengers]. “This threat is new and I hope that it will help public opinion move forward on scanning machines.”

Civil liberties groups have objected to the existing body scan machines, calling them virtual strip searches. They are unlikely to be happy about even more intrusive examination

Logged

Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise - Surangama Sutra

Free Planet

isn't about time the government sent someone through the scanner with a bomb up their rectum in order to tell the news outlets and everyone "see they work and that is why we need them" .

Breast implants FIRST, then the rectal body cavity bomb.

We must work to DISBAND all Surveillance State spying devices in public (streets and transport) and private (schools bathrooms and our own computer cameras).

Seriously, WE ARE NOT THE TERRORISTS, no matter what your algorythm tells you about our criminal CO2 level. And plant more trees, instead of trying to scrape the earth reflective to "GeoEngineer" the planet.

The way these body scans have appeared in the media - is nearly identical to the full frontal/back pictures they took for eugenical purposes of everyone in society in Sweden/Germany (and I presume America as well). This is a return to eugenics of the 1920s-1930s. They did these nude pictures to determine who was 'eugenically fit' and who was not (these are all pictures of the genealogical eugenics records from Sweden/Nazi Germany/America).

Judge for yourself - compare this:

To this:

[...]

Same shit, different window dressing.

Amazing, eh? They can re-introduce the same shit Adolf Hitler did and nobody notices. Stupid people. They really have no one to blame but themselves. And we are going to get hurt because of an overwhelming majority that is so f**king stupid and ignorant they let tyrants like Hitler and Mussolini gain control. The same thing will happen - and is happening - again.

'I AM ADOLF HITLER, AND I APPROVE THIS BODYSCAN MEASURE TO PROTECT US FROM THE TERRORISTS! SECURITY ABOVE ALL IN THE HOMELAND!!!'

Yeah, I just made that up. But notice how this could have been easily a line he gave himself. Hitler always talked about terrorists - the Communists and the Social Democrats, and the Jews of course. And then you always had this talk of 'the homeland'.

BTW - what utter hypocrites over at Imageshack - 'image removed because of violation of terms of services' - OK, so it's perfectly fine to show genealogical photos of nude men, but not of women? Excuse me? This is not 'porn' here - this was the 1930s equivalent of the body scan.

Logged

Infowars Wiki - Help make this become the official wiki of Infowars.com - contribute!

It just goes to show that unless people man up and stand-up history will repeat itself.

Logged

“Good luck to him. I don’t blame him at all, but I justwish he had not hit me so hard. I know he had to protecthis property, and I probably would have done thesame thing in his position. This has certainly stoppedme committing any more crime.” - British burglar elaborating robbery

wvoutlaw2002

Imagine if Chris Hansen were operating the naked body scanner while your child was walking through it.

Hansen: "Sir, your child needs to go through the scanner as well. If you don't comply, I will just call airport police. Do you want your child to cry and defecate herself while she sees daddy being tased to death? Now comply like a good little slave. Okay sweetie, stand in the body scanner for one minute." <muttering to himself> "Look at that hairless vagina. Just the way I like them. Oh I bet she's a screamer. I'm definitely hitting the record button and uploading this to all the CIA-and-FBI-controlled kiddie porn sites."

Imagine if Chris Hansen were operating the naked body scanner while your child was walking through it.

Hansen: "Sir, your child needs to go through the scanner as well. If you don't comply, I will just call airport police. Do you want your child to cry and defecate herself while she sees daddy being tased to death? Now comply like a good little slave. Okay sweetie, stand in the body scanner for one minute." <muttering to himself> "Look at that hairless vagina. Just the way I like them. Oh I bet she's a screamer. I'm definitely hitting the record button and uploading this to all the CIA-and-FBI-controlled kiddie porn sites."

You know - even making jokes about it and stuff furthers the dehumanization agenda and the further perpetuation of this white lie that Man is nothing more than a lower animal.

I've noticed Alex talk about 'pimps' and 'hos' ever since the bodyscanners came in - that, too, essentially plays into the elite's hands, IMHO.

This is just my personal take on the subject.

Logged

Infowars Wiki - Help make this become the official wiki of Infowars.com - contribute!

Body Scanners are, for the most part, just something to concentrate "the kooks" on, just like other issues. We should be working to depose the government, not to remove one particular part of the tyranny while leaving the rest intact. Imagine: How much better a world will be if the scanners dissapeared overnight? The next day, a new measure will be created, somewhere else.

I rang my sister on this issue since I will be travelling through Hethrow airport later during the year and the scanners are there but they are optional to go through. Don't be tricked and go through them they are not lawfully allowed to take you through the scanners and it is sold to the people as if it's a lawful directive that they have to follow.

Logged

“Good luck to him. I don’t blame him at all, but I justwish he had not hit me so hard. I know he had to protecthis property, and I probably would have done thesame thing in his position. This has certainly stoppedme committing any more crime.” - British burglar elaborating robbery

I rang my sister on this issue since I will be travelling through Hethrow airport later during the year and the scanners are there but they are optional to go through. Don't be tricked and go through them they are not lawfully allowed to take you through the scanners and it is sold to the people as if it's a lawful directive that they have to follow.

actually thats not quite true any more.they cannot physically force you into the machine - but - if you refuse to be scanned they can (and according to the msm already have) refuse to let you fly.

Logged

Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise - Surangama Sutra

This is outrageous I will be contacting Heathrow Airport at once about this matter since I am not getting scanned by those machines at any cost!

Logged

“Good luck to him. I don’t blame him at all, but I justwish he had not hit me so hard. I know he had to protecthis property, and I probably would have done thesame thing in his position. This has certainly stoppedme committing any more crime.” - British burglar elaborating robbery

Imagine if Chris Hansen were operating the naked body scanner while your child was walking through it.

Hansen: "Sir, your child needs to go through the scanner as well. If you don't comply, I will just call airport police. Do you want your child to cry and defecate herself while she sees daddy being tased to death? Now comply like a good little slave. Okay sweetie, stand in the body scanner for one minute." <muttering to himself> "Look at that hairless vagina. Just the way I like them. Oh I bet she's a screamer. I'm definitely hitting the record button and uploading this to all the CIA-and-FBI-controlled kiddie porn sites."

WTF does Chris Hansen have to do with this?

Logged

War Is Peace - Freedom Is Slavery - Ignorance Is Strength

"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

Body Scanners are, for the most part, just something to concentrate "the kooks" on, just like other issues. We should be working to depose the government, not to remove one particular part of the tyranny while leaving the rest intact. Imagine: How much better a world will be if the scanners dissapeared overnight? The next day, a new measure will be created, somewhere else.

Unless we turn to the big picture, we're doomed, as C3PO would say.

Exactly, this is just another aspect of control. We are doing shit all about anything.

Because he's a frontman being used to deflect criticism of pedophiles in government and transferring that crticism to thoughtcriminals who have conversations with other government frontmen posing as children.

Imagine if Chris Hansen were operating the naked body scanner while your child was walking through it.

Hansen: "Sir, your child needs to go through the scanner as well. If you don't comply, I will just call airport police. Do you want your child to cry and defecate herself while she sees daddy being tased to death? Now comply like a good little slave. Okay sweetie, stand in the body scanner for one minute." <muttering to himself> "Look at that hairless vagina. Just the way I like them. Oh I bet she's a screamer. I'm definitely hitting the record button and uploading this to all the CIA-and-FBI-controlled kiddie porn sites."

This is outrageous I will be contacting Heathrow Airport at once about this matter since I am not getting scanned by those machines at any cost!

You may be ok - they select people "at random" for enhanced screening but - as yet - not everyone is forced into their perv booth.It is true however - if you are selected and you refuse then they really do prevent you from flying.

I dont know what we can do about it - if you call you may get a manager - or someone - but on the day you will be confronted with a low paid fed up employee who likley wont care who you have spoken to.

Muslim women who refused to take 'naked' full-body scan are barred from Manchester to Pakistan flight By Daily Mail ReporterLast updated at 4:04 PM on 03rd March 2010Comments (319) Add to My Stories Two Muslim women have become the first passengers to refuse to subject themselves to controversial 'naked' full body airport scans, it emerged today.The pair - who security officials insist were selected at random - opted to miss their flight to Pakistan and forfeit tickets worth £400 each rather than be screened.

One of the women refused to go through the full-body scanner at Manchester Airport on religious grounds while her companion also declined for 'medical reasons'.The women were travelling together to Islamabad when they were selected to pass through the controversial security screen after checking-in at Terminal Two at the airport.An estimated 15,000 people have already passed through the scanners, with the pair the first passengers to refuse a scan. Naked scan: A Manchester Airport employee tests the scanner, with suspicious substances in his pockets that show up as a dark colour identified in the red squaresBoth told airport staff they were not willing to be scanned. They were warned they would not be allowed to board the Pakistan International Airlines flight if they refused.The pair decided they would rather forfeit their £400 tickets and left the airport with their luggage.

The £80,000 scanners were introduced at Heathrow and Manchester airports on February 5.The X-ray machines allow security staff to see a 'naked' image of passengers to show up hidden weapons and explosives, but it has attracted criticism for also showing clear outlines of passengers' genitals.

Manchester Airport confirmed the passengers had refused to be scanned but said it had received no complaint from the women. The women were travelling together to Islamabad in Pakistan when they were selected to pass through the controversial security screenHowever, civil liberties campaigners say the incident could form the basis of a legal test case to challenge the use of the Rapiscan device in airports.Alex Deane, director of campaign group Big Brother Watch, said the organisation would represent the women if they wished to challenge the decision in court. More...Airport scanners revealed: TravelMail puts new airport security technology to the test Blog: Are full body scanners really something to blush about?

He said: 'People shouldn't have to sacrifice their health, their faith, their dignity, or their privacy in order to fly.'People with health and religious concerns shouldn't be forced to go through these scanners if they have good reason not to. Foolishly, the government has ignored both issues and ignored privacy concerns to boot - they are in the wrong on this.' Security: The passenger is asked to stand in front of the machine, which produces a virtual 'naked' image that shows if they are carrying explosives or any other suspicious itemsThere is one Rapiscan scanner in use in a trial at Manchester Airport's terminal two, which has seen 15,000 people pass through it.

A further two devices - one each for terminals one and three - have been delivered and are set to be operational within the next month.The scanners have been criticised by the human rights group Liberty and the government's own Equality and Human Rights Commission.Only selected passengers are scanned. Security staff say they are chosen at random and not according to race, religion or ethnicity.Councillor Afzal Khan, who was Manchester's first Asian lord mayor, said the vast majority of Muslims believed that any privacy concerns should be outweighed by ensuring they are safe when flying.He said: 'Hundreds of Muslim passengers have gone through without a problem. While I appreciate people's concerns for privacy, these steps are necessary for our safety and security.' A Manchester Airport spokesman said: 'Two female passengers who were booked to fly out of Terminal Two refused to be scanned for medical and religious reasons.

'In accordance with the government directive on scanners, they were not permitted to fly.

'Body scanning is a big change for customers and we are aware that privacy concerns are on our customers's minds, which is why we have put strict procedures in place to reassure them that their privacy will be protected.'Last month, Transport Secretary Lord Adonis stressed that an interim code of practice on the use of body scanners stipulated that passengers would not be selected 'on the basis of personal characteristics'.

Two weeks ago, a week after the scanners were introduced at Manchester and Heathrow airports, Islamic scholars in the U.S. said Muslim travellers should not pass through the scanners because they violate religious rules on nudity.The Fiqh Council of North America issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, warning Muslims not to go through the scanners.‘It is a violation of clear Islamic teachings that men or women be seen naked by other men and women,’ read the order.‘Islam highly emphasises haya (modesty) and considers it part of faith. The Quran has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts.'In the U.S., there are now 40 scanners in 19 airports and could be as many as 450 by the end of the year.The powerful council of ten scholars that issued the fatwa is affiliated with the Islamic Society of North America.