1 Anal sex
2 BJs that seem to go on and on and on. A guy only takes about 2 mins max to get hard so if you don't intend to swallow move on.
3 Camera angles every ten seconds, continuity come from keeping it real
4 Close ups for too long, seeing the actual act from a reasonable distance is a lot better to watch.

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ralpdpsymon1972 For This Useful Post:

I have to agree on the closeups of the sweaty faced, grimacing guy. That's not why I watch porn, I watch it for the T&A.

If you watch a lot of classic porn like I do, many directors would have the "can't see anything but his ass shot". Basically you have the basic missionary position and the camera aimed right under the guy's ass so all you see is his ugly hairy ass and his dick going into pussy. Why the fuck would any straight man want to watch this and the biggest problem is that most of the fucking scene is in that shot.

Nonstop commentary from the cameraman. This happens mostly in the web based porn industry (see MILF Hunter). I don't care how hot the girl is, the scene can't possibly be enjoyed because of the cameraman never shutting the fuck up. If I wanted inane color commentary, I'd watch John Madden.

The whole anal sex craze. I don't understand anal sex, I just don't see the point in it. Even if it's one of my favorite pornstars, one who always gets me off, if she's in an anal scene, I just don't even watch.

__________________
This post is dedicated to our brother the mighty cockroach. Let him show us the way.

Last edited by Southern TailChaser; 26th March 2009 at 15:48.

The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Southern TailChaser For This Useful Post:

My complaints are very similar to many of those expressed, but I think the problem boils down to one factor, the invent of Viagra.

Since the pill, anyone with a big dick and a camera can shoot a video; no budget, no plot, no imagination, no innate acting or sensuality; just a dick, a pill and a hole. This has resulted in truly awful productions and in the inability of actresses to make the guy cum without him jerking off.

In the past, actresses would fake it, but the actor needed the wood (or a "stand" in for closeups). This helped create a sense of reality, something guys could relate to and appreciate. A chemically induced erection means that the guy is perpetually "faking it", so actresses have been persuaded to compensate for the sake of effect. True, they still fake it, but getting slammed in the ass, gagged or DP'ed makes the faking seem less important.

__________________Review Rules Made Simple Show appreciation for posts by always clicking Send poster a private comment and reputation points by clicking Report spam, phishing or other rules violations by clicking

I am really surprised at all of the people like me that can't stand the anal sex
craze.It would seem like it must be so popular,because every movie that is produced has to have anal in it.It is so mandatory,that even older female pornstars that retired 15 years ago and never did anal back then,have to do it now when they make a comeback.Plus in every pornstar thread on any forum,there is always alot of people asking over and over again "has she ever done any anal","can you post a scene where she does anal","why won't she do anal".

Historically, I never cared for anal in the past, but I must admit that there are anal scenes now that I find very hot. That said, I don't consider it a requirement that so many people seem to these days. I wouldn't call it a pet peeve in general for me, though there are some anal scenes that are just over the top for me, which goes with my next bit.

I agree with some other comments, about the gagging and overly degrading stuff. Even in my dirtest moments I haven't been able to get into that.

I really hate the talking cameraman thing.

Others;

What's with the upside down/pile driver position? Where the woman is propped up along the edge of the couch or whatever, upside down, and the dude is standing above her? In no way does that look interesting, comfortable or satisfying.

All the spitting in porn. I suppose that somewhat goes with the degrading category.

I wish that the majority of movies/scenes out today don't take the time to set up a scene. I enjoy scenes with a bit of a story. Most scenes out today roll from a lame interview, straight to sex, or have no set up at all. And the majority of scenes with a bit of set up, are sites that use essentially the same set up over and over and over, and are into the sex within the first minute or two. "Oh, you're a horny mom and you want to have sex with me? BAM!" That was fun for about a minute, 8 years ago.

I remember when Fast Times at NAU started, I really enjoyed that they were more episodic, in that they would have a mini story that went for about 5 scenes and had characters and a minor story that intertwined them all. But now they're mostly just the same repetitive, "I'm a college student, and I'm horny" scene.

Mark Woods!!
This douche-bag ruins every scene he's in.He's moaning and cooing so fucking loud he drowns out his co-stars everytime.To make matters worse the camerman always zooms to his face(Startled no doubt from the faggy sounds coming out of it)then we get to see his 'Special Olympian" look:mouth agape with fucking drool coming out of those neanderthal Liver-Lips.

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to jaydogbones For This Useful Post: