I'm not asking to be admin, or a moderator, never had, but at least turn it over to Magsj or Only Humean before you leave DC.

From my understanding, your a DC Lawyer who runs a policy something or another for some departments website, likely Department of Indian Affairs (only legal subject you knew anything on).

DC is gonna have a mass reorganization if Trump wins. I'm not willing to call it yet, everyone else has.

Just know, I and Joker and Random Factor will give you tips on how to survive while homeless Carleas. Keep your bicycle, it isn't like your bank accounts, it is a tangeable asset that can help you escape Trumpzilla in DC, as he ravished the city scape, blowing fire and stomping on the wee folks. Remember, your DC bike trail makes it all the way to my town in Weirton, West Virginia. You will see the economic devastation the Clinton's wrecked. I can buy you some chicken nuggets, and show you a safe way to bicycle across the Ohio River. You can make your way out to Iowa, and Joker can buy you even more McNuggets, and advice you the best way into Wyoming, and a cabin you can stay in during the winter, where to hunt.

By springtime, you should have enough jerkey cured to make it over the rocky mountains to meet up with Random Factor. He smokes weed, and is very liberal. Many of your fellow progressives will be trying to set up tent comunes between Eugene and Portland, he can get you a good tree the sleep under, and maybe a mosquito net.

This forum won't ever forget you. We've all been homeless thanks to Obamanomics, now it is your turn. I may be able to offer you a apprentice position in a year or two, so don't give up hope. We are all rooting for you Carleas, hang in there.

Support "The Angels of East Africa" on smile.Amazon.com it is free to do, they donate 0.05% of your purchase cost to them, or give donations directly via:

You sexually harassed another member by sending them porn via PM. I have a very strong interest in making sure that does not happen; I value ILP being free from something like that very highly. By contrast, I place effectively zero value on your ability to PM someone. The odds of you doing something you've done before are greater than zero, the cost of you doing it would be great, and the value to be gained by letting you do it is effectively zero. So, (odds)*(cost):(value) -> I don't trust you nearly enough with the ability to send PMs to restore that functionality to you.

You sexually harassed another member by sending them porn via PM. I have a very strong interest in making sure that does not happen; I value ILP being free from something like that very highly. By contrast, I place effectively zero value on your ability to PM someone. The odds of you doing something you've done before are greater than zero, the cost of you doing it would be great, and the value to be gained by letting you do it is effectively zero. So, (odds)*(cost):(value) -> I don't trust you nearly enough with the ability to send PMs to restore that functionality to you.

What are you, some kind of Hillary Clinton campaign manager or something?

You sexually harassed another member by sending them porn via PM. I have a very strong interest in making sure that does not happen; I value ILP being free from something like that very highly. By contrast, I place effectively zero value on your ability to PM someone. The odds of you doing something you've done before are greater than zero, the cost of you doing it would be great, and the value to be gained by letting you do it is effectively zero. So, (odds)*(cost):(value) -> I don't trust you nearly enough with the ability to send PMs to restore that functionality to you.

Furthermore, my pm ability has much higher value than zero, you are being rude and not open minded.

I'm sorry, I'm a little saucy. This has been a weird week and I'm feisty. And you are right, I'm being rude.

But, given the risk, given your past behavior, and that there are a ton of ways for you to have private conversations with someone on the internet, it's just not worth it to take any responsibility for your private conversations.

Carleas wrote:I'm sorry, I'm a little saucy. This has been a weird week and I'm feisty. And you are right, I'm being rude.

But, given the risk, given your past behavior, and that there are a ton of ways for you to have private conversations with someone on the internet, it's just not worth it to take any responsibility for your private conversations.

What if it was basically the equivalent of a mental apocalypse, and we needed the pms for some kind of case to defeat the censorship army.

Turd Ferguson wrote:He heads the censorship army dumbass, what do you think he does in Washington DC for a living?

Don't call me a dumbass, this was all part of my plan, it's a winwin for me.If he doesn't return my PM's to me, he exposes to the world that he is part of corrupt Washington DC conspiracy and censorship army.If he does return my PM's to me, then I win as well.