Many people have some sense of this, but few realize how deep and intimate the relationship is.

People talk about how doctors make money off vaccines. They are correct. Doctors charge fees for vaccines. They make some on the sale of the product and some on the fee for the visit. For pediatricians much of their income comes from “well baby visits” which are really only necessary for the purpose of giving vaccines. Pediatricians themselves as well as other doctors further make money from treating all the modern ailments babies, children, and increasingly, adults have because of vaccines. There are also a variety of programs that will pay bonuses or offer other financial incentives to doctors, clinics or hospitals that have high vaccination rates among their clientele. While these programs are sold to the public as an attempt to protect the people from illness, if one understands the perverse nature of modern investment finance, we see that the medical industry does not make money on healthy people. They make money on sick people. An investment up front of a few hundred dollars to vaccinate a child can turn into hundreds of thousands of dollars, or even in some cases, millions down the road, on just that one person.

Other people talk about a larger picture. They talk about the billions of dollars the pharmaceutical industry makes from vaccines each year. That number is going up dramatically. Most research and development in the pharmaceutical industry is in the vaccine sector. This is for a few obvious reasons. Vaccines are liability free. They are government mandated in many places and heavily pushed by governments in others. Many people have an inexplicable faith in “vaccines” generally without considering that a “vaccine” for polio is very different from a “vaccine” for high blood pressure or nicotine addiction or religious fervor. And the damage vaccines do to natural, healthy people is undeniable. One can see it clearly just by looking closely. For those who still doubt they can easily find the list of ingredients and then read the toxicology reports of each ingredient. The damage these things do is well established in the scientific literature and official documentation and once you know what to look for, it is hard to miss it in real, living people. It is a great and fertile field for further medical “treatment” and “care,” and thus a rich source of future profits. If people live natural, self empowered, autonomous lives they are largely independent of the “managed care” industry. Once industry starts trying to re engineer them the process goes on for the rest of their life, they become increasingly reliant on industrial “care” and less and less autonomous and this only finally ends with their death. That could be many decades of income and profit to be made on each person who has submitted to the re engineering paradigm.

If we step back and look more broadly we see the problem is not just a superficial one of doctors themselves making money off sick, partially re engineered kids, or even a slightly deeper one of large chemical corporations making money. We have to look at the entire flow of that money and see how deeply integrated it is into our entire social fabric.

A pediatrician is not just one person gathering money to themselves to hoard. They have staff. At least a nurse, a receptionist and a biller. One busy pediatrician could easily account for five or six jobs or more. They not only financially sustain themselves and the other four or five people who work for them. Those five or six people then take the money they earn and spend it in their communities. They pay their mortgage or rent. They buy food, clothes, furniture. They go out to the movies or the theater. They take their family on vacation. They remodel their house. Money is not a simple, static thing. It is the way we exchange energy in the public sphere. It is the way we measure and exchange value in most of what we do in our lives. Money moves and facilitates much of our social activity. Nearly one fifth of that activity is now in “medicine.” One fifth of the working people in the country work in medicine. They rely on the money made by selling drugs, by giving vaccines, by caring for people who have been injured by these things. If we were to immediately create a national health care process based on helping people be healthy there would still be some need for such medical care, but it would go down dramatically. Fifty percent? Seventy? It is hard to say precisely, but it would definitely be enough to drastically shock our national economy, and to put millions of people out of work in short order.

Some people will say we could just find other jobs for all these people. If it were so simple, that would be great. As it is, we have one of the lowest work force participation rates in history, so finding new jobs for a few million people is not going to be so easy, if it is possible at all. Should we find it impossible to create new jobs for ten or twenty million people such a flood of the labor market would further drive down wages, so that an even larger percentage of working people, now currently at about half, would not earn enough money to pay rent, let alone buy food.

There is a yet deeper problem. We are slowly uncovering it in this essay. The next step will get us closer to this comprehensive, world shattering understanding of the complexity of the problem of vaccines and their relationship to money.

When we speak of vaccines and corporate profit, again, we must look deeper. This is not simply an issue of a handful of corporate executives making millions, or billions, off people who are just seeking health and care. These corporations also hire millions of people, collectively. This includes the people who answer the phones and mop the floors. It includes the marketing department, the lawyers, the research and development scientists. It includes the construction companies who build the new facilities, the plumbers who come in when the toilets overflow. And it includes all the university professors and grad students who do contract research. It includes all the private research firms, all the non profit employees who shill for them, and so many more. Pharmaceutical corporations need to make enough money to pay all these salaries, and that money, like the money made in pediatric offices, then flows out to the communities where these people live, work, do business, travel and spend their money.

But it gets even deeper. It keeps going. These corporations also have stock. This stock is held by individuals, by pension plans and in retirement accounts. The executives and officers of the health care and pharmaceutical corporations have one legal responsibility. It has nothing to do with the physical health of their customers. The one legal responsibility of corporate executives and officers of any publicly traded corporation is to increase the value of the shares. This increasing value is what retirees make when they sell their stock. This is what they use to fund their lives. To buy their retirement vacation cottage. To pay for their cruises. To buy their food. To travel to visit their grandchildren. To pay their car insurance, put gas in their car to drive to the bookstore, buy their book, and then sit in the cafe reading it. All this money gets spent in local economies, creating economic exchange and jobs.

Collectively trillions of dollars a year flow through the chemical based “health care” industry in the u.s. alone. While some of that money does indeed go to exorbitant executive pay, most of it circulates through our communities, funding not only the employees of the chemical corporations themselves, but all the people who work downstream as well as much of the retirement income in the nation, and all that money then flows out through the whole of society.

If, in some imaginary science fiction reality we could bring down the vaccine junta, or even destroy the biologically implausible yet financially hugely profitable notion that patented, controlled chemicals equate to health, how much of our modern health care infrastructure would go with it? There will always be some illness in life. We will always have, collectively, some need for health care. Would we destroy half the industry? That would be equal to about ten percent of our total national economy. For those of us who remember the financial collapse of 2008, that collapse took about two percent of our economy and as of this writing, in early 2017, we have still not recovered. The dow may be high and unemployment may be low, but what we are really looking at is the lowest work force participation rate in history, meaning real unemployment could be as high as twenty percent or more, and many of the jobs people are working are poverty level or below. This is great for the owners, aka the stock market. But clearly the human beings who make up most of the country are not doing well, economically. How much more of a blow would it be if we lost another ten percent of our economy? Devastating. What would be left? Such a change would be so drastic, so traumatic, nobody can really predict what would happen. It could lead to true social chaos.

We are almost there. We are almost at the root of the relationship between vaccines and money. We've got one more picture to draw before we can make the whole complete and see how deeply and possibly inextricably embedded in our modern social infrastructure vaccines are.

When we talk about vaccines and money, there is one piece of the puzzle that almost nobody talks about. In the entire vaccine conversation I have only seen a few brief asides about it buried in social media threads. What is this one piece of the puzzle? What is the canvas itself upon which the painting of modern society, and the place of vaccines in it is constructed?

Money.

What is money? We have spent so much time, collectively over the past few years learning about the vaccine side of the equation. We know the ingredients. We know the toxicology. We know the clinical manifestations. We have a great deal of information about how to recover children. We have a growing community, even encompassing members of the medical and financial establishments themselves, of vaccine literate, compassionate, passionate people struggling to spread this knowledge, to bring the truth to a broader audience and to protect and heal children. We are making strides.

But the force of money is strong, and many within the vaccine literate community unwittingly add to that strength every day. In just the past month or so, as of this late winter, 2017 writing, calls to divest of vaccine manufacturer stocks have begun to grow. This is a step in the right direction, but we must dig deeper still. Divesting of stock is great, but if the companies remain profitable it simply means that after a short fall in the stock prices they will again rise, and the people who bought when we divested will make that money.

In order to fully grasp the importance of vaccines for the survival of the international financial system, we must understand at least the basic structure of the system, and the place of vaccines in it. Read this next part slowly. Take your time as you go to envision in your mind's eye, to contemplate and to truly develop an understanding of the way money works, and how it shapes society, even our very consciousness.

What is money? What is the international financial system? They are in fact one and the same.

Many of us think about money only in terms of how much we have and how much more we need to feel comfortable. Those few of us who think much further rarely go so far as to ask the question, what is money? If we do ask that question we come up with something like, “It is a means of exchange.” If we get spiritual, we may say, “It is an exchange of energy.” But this is a very partial description. Every dollar we earn, every dollar we save and every dollar we spend is part of the world wide money supply.

The world wide money supply is a hydra monster. Its appetite is endless and the mouths with which it can feed sprout at every opportunity. What is the world wide money supply? Where does it come from? How is it created? And why are vaccines so important for its survival?

Here is the answer. Brace yourselves. Then take some time to contemplate and fully comprehend what this means:

Money is created when it is borrowed. It must be paid back with interest. When it is paid back, it is destroyed.

Think about that for a moment or ten. Money is created when it is borrowed. This means all money represents a debt that must eventually be repaid. It must be repaid with interest, meaning more must be repaid than was borrowed. This means the money supply has to grow each year, which means collectively we have to borrow more each year. Forever.

Or until we radically transform, or even do away with money altogether.

When I want to buy a house, I go to a bank and ask for a loan. But the bank is not sitting on a stack of money, some of which it hands over to me when I ask to borrow it. When I sign that mortgage, I create the money. It did not exist before I created it. All money in existence today was created this way. It was all borrowed into existence. And it was all borrowed against an asset. That is, in order to create the money, there has to be an asset, a thing of value. In the case of a home mortgage, the asset is the house and the land. But money can be created against almost any asset. It can be created against a gold mine, a factory, a cotton field, your future labor. Anything of value can be used as an asset for money creation.

This modern system was created with the founding of the Bank of Amsterdam in 1609. It has changed and evolved to a degree, but the basics remain the same. It was created to facilitate colonial expansion. Amsterdam was the commercial center of European expansion and the amount of gold on hand to finance exploration and trade missions was not sufficient to keep pace with the potential. So they created fractional reserve banking. The gold reserves in the bank represented a fraction, one tenth, of the total value of receipts the bank could issue. That is, existing deposits could be magnified so long as there was the promise of repayment. That repayment came in the form of profit from colonial missions. In this way the asset base grew. It began with a couple tons of gold in the warehouses and grew to include the colonies, the plantations, the ships, the slaves and colonized people, the products of their labor and more. Anything of value that could be added was. Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries colonial expansion was the main source of the growing asset pool. In the nineteenth century oil was added. In the twentieth century there was more oil, natural gas was added and the population grew. The work they could do expanded exponentially. What little bit of the land that was not included in the international asset pool was added. In short, virtually everything we could get our hands on that could in any way be considered of value was added to the asset pool. The hydra monster sprouted many heads, and they all ate anything they could find.

This allowed the asset pool to grow. This is incredibly important for the survival of the system. Every dollar issued is a debt. It must be repaid. Remember, it must be repaid with interest. When they speak of the need for economic growth, this is the reason for that need. If the economy grows there is enough money to keep the existing activity going and to service existing loans and pay the interest. If the asset pool shrinks, we are all in trouble. It is like a game of musical chairs. When the international asset pool shrinks, there simply isn't enough money for everybody. In fact, because of interest obligations, even if the international asset pool simply remains the same size, it is as if we removed a chair or two million.

When we pay off a loan, that money disappears, so we must keep borrowing up, and growing, at least collectively. In 2008 and 2009 we experienced a world wide decline in economic activity of a couple percentage points, and it nearly destroyed the entire world economy. Borrowing was down. That meant there simply wasn't enough money in circulation to meet existing expenses and pay the principle, let alone account for growth to pay the interest. This led to massive bankruptcies and foreclosures, even at the national level. If we were to stop vaccination and lose that part of the medical industry that it supports, we could see a much larger decline in economic activity, and a much more significant collapse. Ten percent of the work force would lose their jobs. The stock market and the retirement and pension accounts it funds would collapse. All that money would disappear from the economy. Tax receipts would drop. While many people oppose taxes and government, nearly half the work force is employed in government at one level or another, and dropping tax revenues would mean major layoffs federally and locally. How many dominoes would fall is hard to predict, but a ten percent drop in the economy would be unprecedented. Many people think the world wide financial system and the economy it facilitates simply would not survive. I will allow my courageous reader to contemplate a world without cell phones, netflix, international shipping that brings plumbing pipes to the house building market, delivers natural gas for home heating or solar panels for alternative energy, etc.

How is this so? How has our entire economic life become so intricately, inextricably entwined with international high finance? How is finance now in such a precarious position that we must vaccinate all children on the planet multiple times in order to keep it alive, and to ensure it can continue to allow the economic activity upon which we all rely, not only for our own income but for the very stuff that keeps us all alive and provides the material substance for civilization?

Here we come to the final puzzle piece. If we have understood all that was written before, and if we can understand this next part of the story, it will be clear just how intimately tied to the international financial system vaccines are, and how central to its success, even to its survival, they are.

For four hundred years this modern colonial financial system has grown and spread across the world. It consumes everything in its path, from land to people to resources, labor and the products of that labor. Virtually every material thing, every piece of land, every human and everything we produce or do is now part of the international asset pool. Since the late 1990s at least we have been feeling the pinch of declining growth in the international asset pool. That is, what little is left to add is not sufficient to keep the hydra monster fed. The traditional sources of growth, land, people, energy and labor, are maxed out. The system requires new fodder. In the late 1990s we got the dot com boom. Loans were taken out, money poured in. The asset pool was fed by these new companies. But they were not producing anything. They simply moved ideas about the globe. And most of them didn't even do that well. It was at this time that the focus of financial avarice was first turned to intellectual property. In the past intellectual property was for professors and inventors. By now the intellectual property market has grown so large, every idea you post to social media has a dollar amount, or at least a cents amount attached to it. Around 2000 the initial intellectual property bubble, also known as the dot com bubble, burst, taking billions of dollars with it. The next source of asset pool growth was mortgages. This was a very dangerous game. Traditionally in order to issue new money there had to be an actual asset. The asset was the house, the paper mortgage was simply an indicator of the asset. With the dot com boom we were already treading a dangerous path, using nothing but the promise of idea brand loyalty as an asset. With the mortgage boom of the early 2000s they did something brand new. Desperation for new assets pushed the financial industry into an even more unsustainable field. They used the paper itself as an asset. And they did it again and again with the same paper. When this scheme collapsed in 2008 we all experienced the associated collapse of a couple percentage points. Now this system is casting about for new sources of assets. What can be added to the pool? What can keep the number growing to feed the old number? How can the children of today feed the needs and appetites of the old people who own the corporations and rely on their profitability for their financial well being?

Here it is important that we realize, every dollar we have, every dollar we earn, save or spend, is created in this same way. While we may go to work providing a truly useful service to our neighbor, the dollars we exchange are part of this entire world wide financial system, a system that only exists based on this process of continual growth, of consuming everything in its path.

So what is there to add to the asset pool now? What is left for the hydra monster to consume? What are the next growth sectors of the economy? The three things that have been so far identified are intellectual property, blood and genes. This means that our ideas are now financial commodities. Granted, many of them have very little value. Yet it is just this that social media corporations capitalize. The assets that keep the international asset pool growing are your desire for a new pair of pants, or a vacation on a tropical beach, or a new multi level marketing product. It also means that our blood is now a financial commodity, a thing upon which debt notes and contracts to repay can be issued. In essence, our blood is another location for colonization. If we get one drug in, it opens the gateway and the odds go way up that we'll not only be able to keep selling you that drug for years, but we'll be able to sell you more drugs until your entire life is nothing more than a commercial chemical experiment. Seventy percent of American adults are now on pharmaceuticals. Over half are on more than one. Half of kids are now hooked as well. And those numbers are just going up. The blood of the people is in the asset pool. Genes are the next frontier. Already patented genes are being used to control field crops. More and more they are being used to control life. Patented genes are owned by the corporations that hold the patents and licensed to those who use them. They can be found now also in insects and increasingly in other animals and even in humans, via vaccines and food. While finding a few engineered, patented, licensed genes in a human is not sufficient cause for the patent owning corporation to take legal control of that person, at a certain point the courts will have to decide what percentage of patented genetic material constitutes ownership of a life form, and eventually of a human. But even that dark day aside, simply the health damage done through genetic engineering insures corporate profit growth through the subjugation of the ill human to the re engineering paradigm.

We can all be taken aback, aghast at the horrors of such progress. But the simple truth is, we all participate even if we do not actively take the drugs or even eat the patented foods. As I pointed out before, we all measure and exchange value using money. We may personally, in our small field of vision, relate to money as a simple means of exchange between two people, or within a community. But every dollar in circulation, every dollar we earn, save or spend, is a part of the one international financial system that was built to facilitate this international commerce and colonial expansion. By law, and by simple, observable fact, when we use money to measure value in our lives and to facilitate and mark our interactions with others in our communities, we acquiesce to participation in the global financial system. We can speak ad infinitum about how much we detest the system, but we participate in it and use it, and nearly all material goods in our lives, nearly all services provided, and outside of a very small sphere, nearly all of our interactions with other human beings take place in this international marketplace under its rules.

This system was built on the principle of expansion and the need to continue adding assets to the collective pool, no matter the human cost in blood, flesh or morality. This modern system may only be four hundred years old, but the underlying principles, the very existence of money, is over five thousand years old. Money was created to facilitate imperial conquest and has always been associated with war, expansion, and debt. To get a more complete, historically accurate, well researched understanding of this, read the book, “Debt: The First 5,000 Years,” by world renowned anthropologist, Dr. David Graeber.

Vaccines play an incredibly important role in the maintenance of the entire world wide financial system, and all of our lives are intimately tied to that system. Without it there is no money. Can you imagine a life without money? Not just for yourself, living under a bridge eating out of a dumpster, but for all of us? Many people say they can, but when pressed, can't come up with any real idea besides the poorly thought out concept of barter. They would replace a system so complex it has taken five thousand years to evolve, with barter. Trading tomatoes for wool is not going to facilitate the manufacture of plumbing pipes, let alone smart phones or airplanes. Even if it survives, yet the asset pool does not grow, or declines, the money supply will dry up and it will again be as if seats are being removed from the game of musical chairs. To be clear, with the lowest work force participation rate in history, half of those who work not taking home a livable wage and half of those who do with no savings to speak of, already many chairs have been removed. Most people, if they are in the game at all, are standing on the sidelines, or kneeling on the floor. Would the money system survive a ten percent drop? Possibly. But considering what has happened since 2008, one must ask, “Will I survive?” Maybe. But considering that we now have the lowest work force participation rate in history, half the jobs pay poverty wages and half the rest of those who work have no savings of any significance, the odds alone are against most of us, and the structural shifts might be so great that hardly anybody is truly served by the international financial system any longer.

Upon hearing this, we are then faced with a loss...

The above is part of a larger essay. In the following parts of the essay we will examine what it is we lose. We will also examine where current trends are heading and what, if anything can be done about it. While I do have hope, there is no easy road ahead.

Stay tuned for the rest of the essay. It will be included in a book of essays on similar, related topics. The working title of the book is, "Seismic Readings." The aim of this book is to illuminate the state of our world via the fiasco of vaccines and associated toxic culture in a way that provides a way forward.