Improved Combination of Multiple Atmospheric GCM Ensembles for Seasonal PredictionRobertsonAndrew W.authorColumbia University. International Research Institute for Climate and SocietyLallUpmanuauthorColumbia University. Earth and Environmental EngineeringColumbia University. Civil Engineering and Engineering MechanicsZebiakStephen E.authorColumbia University. International Research Institute for Climate and SocietyGoddardLisa M.authorColumbia University. International Research Institute for Climate and SocietyColumbia University. Earth and Environmental SciencesColumbia University. International Research Institute for Climate and SocietyoriginatortextArticles2004EnglishAn improved Bayesian optimal weighting scheme is developed and used to combine six atmospheric general circulation model (GCM) seasonal hindcast ensembles. The approach is based on the prior belief that the forecast probabilities of tercile-category precipitation and near-surface temperature are equal to the climatological ones. The six GCMs are integrated over the 1950–97 period with observed monthly SST prescribed at the lower boundary, with 9–24 ensemble members. The weights of the individual models are determined by maximizing the log likelihood of the combination by season over the integration period. A key ingredient of the scheme is the climatological equal-odds forecast, which is included as one of the "models" in the multimodel combination. Simulation skill is quantified in terms of the cross-validated ranked probability skill score (RPSS) for the three-category probabilistic hindcasts. The individual GCM ensembles, simple poolings of three and six models, and the optimally combined multimodel ensemble are compared. The Bayesian optimal weighting scheme outperforms the pooled ensemble, which in turn outperforms the individual models. In the extratropics, its main benefit is to bring much of the large area of negative-precipitation RPSS values up to near-zero values. The skill of the optimal combination is almost always increased (in the large spatial averages considered) when the number of models in the combination is increased from three to six, regardless of which models are included in the three-model combination. Improvements are made to the original Bayesian scheme of Rajagopalan et al. by reducing the dimensionality of the numerical optimization, averaging across data subsamples, and including spatial smoothing of the likelihood function. These modifications are shown to yield increases in cross-validated RPSS skills. The revised scheme appears to be better suited to combining larger sets of models, and, in the future, it should be possible to include statistical models into the weighted ensemble without fundamental difficulty.Atmospheric sciencesMeteorologyMonthly Weather Review13212273227442004-12http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/MWR2818.1http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:14365NNCNNC2012-08-14 11:40:41 -04002012-08-14 11:51:07 -04008385eng