Pages

Friday, June 28, 2013

The War on Terror is a Fraud: How the West has Fostered Radical Islam and Actively Keeps it Alive.

"In the mid-'80s, if
you remember... Saudi Arabia and the United States were supporting
the Mujahideen to liberate Afghanistan from the Soviets. He [Osama
bin Laden] came to thank me for my efforts to bring the Americans,
our friends, to help us against the atheists, he said the communists.
Isn't it ironic?" - Prince Bandar bin Sultan of Saudi Arabia, on
Larry King Live1

President Reagan
meets with members of the Mujahideen in the Oval Office, 1985

In 2009, a series of events
occurred that ought to have raised questions in the press. First, the
United States began a troop surge in Afghanistan designed to deliver
the final blow to the Taliban insurgency.2
Then the United States provided a $7.5 billion aid package to
Pakistan.3
Around the same time, the Carnegie Foundation published a study which
revealed a majority of Pakistan aid goes to the intelligence agency
ISI and the military.4
The problem with these three events is that earlier in the year, U.S.
officials revealed to the New York Times that the ISI was
funding the Taliban, and was responsible for providing direct
assistance and helping with some of their strategic strikes.5

The press did cover these
stories, but independent of one another. Not one media institution
connected the dots that the United States was actively funding the
harm that its armed forces were simultaneously fighting. Following
the official narrative of the war, it certainly doesn't make any
sense that the United States was indirectly prolonging the quagmire.
Perhaps such mistakes are the inevitability of a bloated war
bureaucracy, or that U.S. officials simply didn't realize the
connection. Unfortunately, a collection of evidence points to a more
sinister explanation: the United States and its allies have been
deliberately proliferating radical Islam for decades, only to later
spend trillions fighting the enemy they created.

Just
days after the July 7, 2005 London terror attack, and less than a
month before his untimely death, the Right Honorable Robin Cook,
former UK Foreign Secretary, wrote a scathing and emotional review of
the War on Terror in The
Guardian.

“Bin Laden was, though, a product of a
monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout
the '80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage
jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida,
literally "the database", was originally the computer file
of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with
help from the CIA to defeat the Russians. Inexplicably, and with
disastrous consequences, it never appears to have occurred to
Washington that once Russia was out of the way, Bin Laden's
organization would turn its attention to the west.”6

While Cook's remarks were
downplayed and ridiculed by the mainstream media and the United
Kingdom establishment at the time, available evidence shows his
assertions to be largely correct.

* * * *

Operation Cyclone

"They [the CIA] told me
these people were fanatical, and the more fierce they were the more
fiercely they would fight the Soviets... I warned them that we were
creating a monster." - Scholar Selig Harrison7

The story begins in 1978
shortly after the Saur Revolution, which resulted in the communist
People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan gaining control of the
Afghanistan government. The CIA immediately initiated a program known
as Operation Cyclone and began funding militant Islamic groups
favored by the Pakistani intelligence agency ISI, to the tune of 7.5
billion.8
The money went to producing, training, and arming militant Islamic
radicals who be directed towards fighting the secular communist
government. At the time, the Mujahideen was composed of many
different, loosely organized groups encompassing a broad spectrum of
ideologies, with widely varying perspectives on religion, society and
state. Seven major Afghan factions began receiving aid, three of
them Islamic moderates and four of them Islamic fundamentalists as
defined by the military, and in addition to native Afghans they were
composed of many foreigners who traveled to fight the invasion, such
as Osama bin Laden himself.9

To understand the scope of
the funding, the BBC stated that the CIA provided enough arms
to equip a 240,000 man army, and Saudi Arabia matched them dollar for
dollar.10
The weapons given to these fighters were not just AK-47s and other
simple arms. Many were high tech, such as Stinger Anti-Aircraft
missiles11,
provided with the intention of demoralizing Soviet commanders and
soldiers.12

The majority of the funding
was funneled through the ISI, which acted as an arm of CIA interests
and began setting up religious schools known as Madrassas in Pakistan
cities and frontier areas, churning out tens of thousands of students
who would join the Mujahideen.13
(Note: Madrassas are not inherently negative institutions, however
the ones who received funding from the CIA were particularly
radical).

All of this began before
the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. A full 6 months, according to
Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter's National Security Advisor,
who recalled his involvement to a French news magazine in 1998:

"We didn't push the
Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability
that they would... That secret operation was an excellent idea. It
had the effect of drawing the Soviets into the Afghan trap. The day
that the Soviets officially crossed the border I wrote to President
Carter, 'We now have the opportunity of giving the Soviet Union its
Vietnam War.'"14

* * * *

Early Years of Osama Bin
Laden

When
Osama bin Laden arrived in Afghanistan from Saudi Arabia, he created
a group called Maktab al-Khidamat, abbreviated as MAK, a precursor to
Al-Qaeda. It is frequently claimed that the CIA directly funded this
group, though top CIA officers say that this is not the case. It has
been confirmed, at least, that the MAK did receive funding from the
ISI,15
the CIA's primary conduit for conducting their covert war against
Russia.

CIA
Station Chief in Afghanistan Milt Bearden has stated that he was well
aware of Bin Laden in the Mujahideen, and welcomed his efforts in
funding, though he never met with him personally.16
Bin Laden also brought in construction equipment from his fathers
company Saudi Binladen Group, considered the largest construction
firm in the world, to build training camps, in collaboration with the
ISI and CIA.17

In
1986, Osama used his construction assets to build a CIA financed
tunnel complex to serve as a training facility. It was also a major
arms and medical depot for the Mujahideen in the Peshawar mountains
near Pakistan which was later used by Al-Qaeda.18
15 years later, the Western Media would describe Al-Qaeda as hiding
out in caves, but the truth is a little more complex: there were
intricate tunnels connecting hundreds of different caves, a majority
of them man-made, equipped with irrigation systems, accommodation for
trucks and even tanks, hotels, mosques, arms depots, medical and
radio centers, and kitchens.19
In short, it is more accurate to call them mountain fortresses.

Al-Qaeda was formed
sometime between 1987-88, with the radical elements of MAK joining
after the group split.

It is apparent that the CIA
had no plan to deal with the tunnel complex after the conclusion of
Operation Cyclone, though surely that must have been aware that the
cadre of radicals they were instrumental in producing would not
simply disappear or de-radicalize. Perhaps long term destabilization
of the country was their plan all along.

* * * *

The Taliban

Evidence
suggests that the Taliban is actively involved with Al-Qaeda. For
example, one 1998 State Department cable claimed that: "Taliban
Leader Mullah Omar lashed out at the U.S., asserting that the Taliban
will continue providing a safe haven for Bin Laden."20

There
is plenty of evidence that Pakistan's ISI currently actively funds
the Taliban and other terrorist cells as well, while barring the U.S.
military from operating in the tribal areas. A 2010 BBC
article
stated that the ISI was giving “funding, training and sanctuary to
the Afghan Taliban on a scale much larger than previously thought,”
going as far as to say that support for the Taliban was “official
ISI policy.” Since 9/11, the United States has given Pakistan over
$15 billion, much of which goes to the ISI and military.21

Current
Vice President Joe Biden said himself in 2003 that the ISI was either
turning a blind eye or cooperating with the Taliban. In addition,
some members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee "contend
that the intelligence service may have provided money, weapons and
broadcast equipment to Taliban fighters now in Pakistan to transmit
anti-Karzai, anti-American messages into Afghanistan."22BBC
has reported on a secret NATO document which notes: "Pakistan's
manipulation of the Taliban senior leadership continues unabated."23

A
report published by the London School of Economics gave 9 in depth
interviews with Taliban insurgent commanders. They suggest that the
ISI has members on the Taliban leadership council, though they
expressed fear of assassination if they went into to much depth on
this topic.24

It's
not hard to establish that the United States has allied itself with
one of the biggest funders of terrorism in the Middle East, a fact
which blatantly clashes with the official narrative of Western
involvement in the region. It makes much more sense when understood
in the context that the goal of the United States in the Middle East
is not the prevention of terrorism, but rather for political,
military and economic hegemony.

* * * *

Osama Runs Wild

“I do not profess a broad
expertise in international affairs, but between January 1996 and June
1999 I was in charge of running operations against Al-Qaeda from
Washington. When it comes to this small slice of the large U.S.
national security pie, I speak with firsthand experience (and for
several score of CIA officers) when I state categorically that during
this time senior White House officials repeatedly refused to act on
sound intelligence that provided multiple chances to eliminate Osama
bin Laden -- either by capture or by U.S. military attack. I
witnessed and documented, along with dozens of other CIA officers,
instances where life-risking intelligence-gathering work of the
agency's men and women in the field was wasted.” - Michael Scheuer,
22 year veteran of the CIA25

A
2001 Washington Post article states that in 1996 the
government of Sudan offered to keep tabs on Osama, or if that did not
suffice, arrest him and hand him over to either the United States or
Saudi custody.26

"The Sudanese security
services, he said, would happily keep close watch on bin Laden for
the United States. But if that would not suffice, the government was
prepared to place him in custody and hand him over, though to whom
was ambiguous. In one formulation, Erwa said Sudan would consider any
legitimate proffer of criminal charges against the accused
terrorist." Their negotiations concluded as such: ""We
said he will go to Afghanistan, and they [U.S. officials] said, 'Let
him.'"

The
Clinton administration claimed that they lacked criminal charges to
pin on Bin Laden, though this explanation is a farce, as within a
year ago previous they had named him as a co-conspirator in the World
Trade Center bombing, among other terrorist activities.27
Just a year later, the Clinton administration would commit the
egregious war crime of the bombing of the Sudanese Al-Shifa
pharmaceutical factory, which provided 50% of the medicine for
Sudan.28
The destruction of the factory was estimated to be responsible for
the deaths of “several tens of thousands” of people according to
the German ambassador to Sudan, on a much flimsier pretext.29
Interestingly, the pretext of the Al-Shifa bombing is that the
factory had ties to Bin Laden, in the very country that had proposed
to extradite him, by the very people who declined to accept his
arrest.

A
2002 article in The
Guardian
reveals that the first INTERPOL arrest warrant for Bin Laden came
from Libya's Muammar Gaddafi in 1998.30
It also uncovered that the MI6 paid large sums of money to an
Al-Qaeda cell in Libya in a failed attempt to assassinate Gaddafi.
Perhaps this is why U.S. and U.K. intelligence agencies apparently
buried the fact that Libya had issued the warrant for Bin Laden's
arrest and downplayed the threat he posed. 5 months after the arrest
warrant was issued, Al-Qaeda killed over 200 people in bombings of
U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.31
These actions are consistent with the trend of working with Al-Qaeda
when they shared the same goals, and fighting them when war in the
region was a strategic geopolitical move.

* * * *

US Trained Terrorists

It
has been widely reported, thanks to revelations by ABC
reporter John Cooley, that some Islamic fundamentalists were trained
in the United States in the 1980's, by way of Camp Peary, the CIA spy
base in Virginia, being flown in from places such as Jordan, Egypt
and even Africa.32
It raises the question of how many such camps existed beyond the
United States. Regardless, there have been some astonishing
revelations of terrorists trained within the US borders.

One
specifically alarming case is that of Egyptian Ali Muhammed. He was a
part of the fundamentalist military unit that assassinated Egyptian
President Anwar Sadat in 1981. In 1984, he was hired by the CIA,
though they claim that the relationship was short-lived.33
He would soon join the military and become a member of the Green
Berets, and serve as a drill sergeant at Fort Bragg while providing
clandestine training to jihadists such as Mahmud Abaouhalima,
convicted perpetrator of the 1993 World Trade Center bombings.34

He
would take a short leave from his military duties and travel to
Afghanistan in 1988 to assist the Mujahideen, returning just months
later.35
Such an act is completely unheard of, entirely unprecedented and
raises all sorts of red flags. Who was allowing Muhammed to
circumvent the law and what type of special privileges and
protections was he receiving? In the early 1990's he would
return to Afghanistan and began training jihadists with the skills he
had learned at Fort Bragg. According to former FBI special agent Jack
Cloonan, in an interview with PBS, his first training session
included Osama bin Laden, as well as Ayman al-Zawahiri, the current
leader of Al-Qaeda.36

Former
Directors of Counter-terrorism at the National Security Council have
alleged that Muhammed took maps and training materials from Fort
Bragg and used them to write the Al-Qaeda terrorist training manual.37

“I think you or I would have a better
chance of winning the Powerball lottery, than an Egyptian major in
the unit that assassinated Sadat would have getting a visa, getting
to California, getting into the Army and getting assigned to a
Special Forces unit. That just doesn’t happen.”38

Elsewhere
he stated: "It was unthinkable that an ordinary American GI
would go unpunished after fighting in a foreign war," and that
he assumed that Muhammed was sponsored by the CIA.39

In
the year 2000, Muhammed plead guilty to involvement in the 1998
embassy bombings that killed 224 people including 12 Americans.40
He admitted during the trial that he was a part of a broader plot to
attack any Western target in the Middle East, as well as admitting
that he helped transfer Osama bin Laden from Pakistan to Sudan.

* * * *

United States and
Al-Qaeda Have The Same Agenda

In 2011, NATO, led by Barack Obama and
the United States, initiated military action against Libya by
enforcing a No Fly Zone and carried out numerous air strikes,
including one against Libyan state TV which killed 3 journalists.41
Downplayed in Western media was the fact that the 'rebels' consisted
of various factions of radical Islamists, many who had been fighting
Gaddafi for decades and had their roots in the Mujahideen in
Afghanistan, such as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, whose goal is
to implement an Islamic state.42CNN has reported on widespread abuses against civilians from
these groups after Gaddafi was ousted from power, including the use
of landmines and other deadly equipment.43
Many of the rebels have admitted links to Al-Qaeda44,
whom had declared support for the rebels in Libya.45

The
Washington Post has reported that a former Al-Qaeda member has
estimated there to be 1000 'freelance jihadists' that have traveled
to Libya to support the rebels, many affiliated with Al-Qaeda, and
also that Libya has one of the highest domestic Al-Qaeda populations
in the Middle East, quoting a 2007 West Point study on the subject.46

In 1999, the United States decided to
support the Kosovo Liberation Army, allies of Al-Qaeda. Bill Clinton
framed the intervention in humanitarian terms despite the fact that
staggering atrocities were being committed on both sides.47
French News Agency AFP reported that members of the KLA had
been trained by Bin Laden48,
and the Washington Times reported that the KLA bankrolled
their operations with funds from the heroin trade in Afghanistan and
had accepted money from Bin Laden himself.49

The Mujahideen, many specifically
members of Al-Qaeda, were also instrumental in Bosnia during the NATO
intervention in 1993. Their presence is still a factor of instability
today.50
It is of significance that all of these associations occurred after
the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, when Al-Qaeda
first became widespread in the American lexicon.

Barack
Obama has been arming rebels in Syria, beginning secretly with CIA
arms airlifts in 201251,
citing many of the same reasons for intervention that Clinton did in
1999, despite domestic and foreign ally opposition.5253 Once
again, many of the rebels have been associated with Al-Qaeda and
labeled terrorist organizations by the US.54

* * * *

The Source of Radicalism

Earlier
I mentioned CIA funded madrassas being a source of Islamic radicalism
in the 1980's. They have been an important factor in the
radicalization of Islam ever since. As of 2008, there are ~750
madrassas in Pakistan that teach jihad and radicalism, about 10% of
all madrassas in the country (and I want to emphasize that this
section is referring to specific radical iterations of Madrassas, not
simply applying a blanket generalization to the religious style of
education).55
U.S. diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks revealed that the
funding for these radical schools now comes from Saudi Arabia, the
United States' biggest ally in the region.56
The radical madrassa network exploits impoverished areas by
recruiting children for what essentially amounts to indoctrination
camps. In exchange, families receive upwards of $6,500 per son for
their 'sacrifice to Islam', and during schooling, contact with
families is forbidden. After graduation, many are funneled into
terrorist training camps in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas,
the cables stated.

PBS
Frontline did a story on a 16 year old who was recruited to a
Pakistan Wahhabi Islam madrassa from an impoverished area in East
Africa.57
A few years later, he was instrumental in a terror plot, blowing up
the US Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya. The PBS website hosts a
letter he wrote to his brother, in which he says he spent two years
on a military base learning warfare, including the usage of Israeli
arms.58

Is the CIA still involved? The House of
Saud has given at least $1.474 billion dollars to the Bush family59,
and the United States sold Saudi Arabia $60 billion worth of arms in
2010, the biggest arms sale in American history.60
Before he was president, George H.W. Bush was the Director of the
CIA. As recently as June 25th, 2013, Secretary of State John Kerry
announced that Saudi Arabia is 'one of our closest partners'.61
At the very least we can establish complicity.

Regardless,
the United States' relationship with Saudi Arabia ought to raise a
lot of important questions. On November 4th,
2013, Secretary of State John Kerry hailed Saudi Arabia as a very
important ally to the United States.62
How can we reconcile this stance with the 2010 cable leaks revealing
that former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton said that donors in the
kingdom “constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni
terrorist groups worldwide,” and that “it has been an ongoing
challenge to persuade Saudi officials to treat terrorist financing
emanating from Saudi Arabia as a strategic priority”?63
It is clear that the United States views their geopolitical
relationship with Saudi Arabia to be much more important than
combating terrorism, despite U.S. Involvement in the Middle East
being saturated with rhetoric about the War on Terror. The same
statement can be applied to the relationship with Pakistan, who is
instrumental in the operations of the Taliban.

* * * *

Double Agents

The assassination of high-profile
Pakistan tribal leader Qari Zainuddin was widely reported in the
Western media.64
Only days before his assassination he had renounced his support of
the Taliban, claiming that their actions were un-Islamic. What the
Western media neglected to report but was widely reported in Pakistan
and other countries was Zainuddin had previously claimed that
Baitullah Mehsud, the man who ended up ordering his assassination,
was an American agent.65

The claim that American agents operate
in the Taliban sounds far-fetched but there have been some
eye-opening reports that confirm the possibility. For example, a 2004
article in the UK publication Times Online reported that a
high ranking Al-Qaeda member had been revealed to be a double agent
working for MI5.

“Abu Qatada boasted to MI5 that he
could prevent terrorist attacks and offered to expose dangerous
extremists, while all along he was setting up a haven for his terror
organisation in Britain."66

Abu Qatada has been imprisoned multiple
times in Britain but has not been charged with any crimes. During his
career he has issued fatwahs justifying the killing of converts from
Islam, advocated the killing of Jews, praised attacks on America, and
convicted of charges of terrorism in Jordan, all while working in
association with MI5.67

A
2002 article published by French news organization AFP states
that Palestine security forces had arrested a group of Palestinians
who had confessed to collaborating with Israel and posing as
operatives of Al-Qaeda.68

“He [Palestinian Authority Official]
said the alleged collaborators sought to "discredit the
Palestinian people, justify every Israeli crime and provide reasons
to carry out a new (military) aggression in the Gaza Strip."

The
arrest came just two days after Ariel Sharon claimed that Al-Qaeda
militants were operating in Gaza and Lebanon, likely in an attempt to
justify future military action. BBC
has also reported on this story.69

* * * *

“The Official Story”

The official story is that Bin Laden and
Al-Qaeda found new enemies in the U.S. after the Cold War when the
United States began occupying military bases in Saudi Arabia. It
sounds plausible, but does not stand up to deeper scrutiny.

In 1993, Scott Armstrong, at the time
the top investigative reporter for the Washington Post, gave
some tremendously revealing interviews with PBS Frontline. In
an episode titled "The Arming of Saudi Arabia", he stated
that the United States and Saudi Arabia had jointly conspired to
covertly build $200 billion worth of military installations between
the years 1979 and 1992.70
Steve Coll, eminent Bin Laden biographer, states that the Binladen
group received a multitude of these contracts, with the knowing
intent to support and house US military personal during wars that may
threaten Saudi territory.71

This
occurred during the same time that Osama bin Laden was actively using
Binladen Group assets to build extensive infrastructure in
Afghanistan. Surely he was aware of the construction of the military
bases and who intended to occupy them, yet he did not have a problem
then with the prospect then.

* * * *

Money

During the peak of World War II,
military and defense spending reached a rate of over 40% of the
United States Gross Domestic Product.72
Even after a massive demobilization, the military-industrial complex
had grown to a behemoth, averaging over 7% of GDP throughout the Cold
War. According to the Cato Institute, the United States spent a total
of $6 trillion on military and intelligence in just 4 decades during
the Cold War, a staggering sum.

After the Soviet Union was defeated, the
Military Industrial Complex experienced a steady decline, accounting
for just 3.7% of GDP in the year 2000. This changed on 9/11, when the
MIC found that they could turn their old friends into new enemies to
fight, and their percentage of GDP
has more than doubled in the last decade.73

Congress
has officially authorized more than 1.3 trillion dollars to fight the
war on terror, and a Brown University study says this is just the tip
of the iceberg: Even if the War on Terror were to begin de-escalating
now, it would end up costing a total of 3.9 trillion between domestic
spending, veterans costs, and interest.74
The money comes from the taxpayers of the United States, whether
directly or indirectly, and goes to the pockets of defense
contractors and banks.

* * * *

Al-Qaeda Today

In 2003, Donald Rumsfeld wrote a memo to
the Joint Chiefs of Staff where he stated that “We need to stop
populating Guantanamo Bay with low-level enemy combatants.”75
The memo was uncovered in 2011. Over 750 prisoners have gone through
Guantanamo, most being released without charges.76
Of the ~160 prisoners in Guantanamo Bay today, half have been cleared
for release but are still being detained.77
Former CIA Director Leon Panetta said in 2010 that there were less
than 100 Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan.78

* * * *

Conclusion

After
trillions of dollars spent, hundreds of thousands of deaths, repeated
domestic rights infringements, we are left with only a handful of
proven Al-Qaeda members, with a majority of prisoners simply being
held without charges. The organization purported to be a sprawling
monster after the September 11th
attacks has been revealed to be a shell of an operation, financed by
wealthy US allies. The result is endless war: Politicians, military
and media shine the light just right to make the shadow of the mouse
look huge and monstrous to justify endless profits. The media is not
even connecting the most basic of dots to reveal the tremendous
deception.

The evidence is a repeated
policy of the destabilization of Central Asia and the development of
Islamic radicals that spans decades. The result is a new global enemy
without borders or diplomatic representation that can be fought
indefinitely. Unless significant changes are made, we are looking at
a future with an endless war on 'terrorism' where more terrorists are
created daily by the very policies that are meant to be fighting
them, and a foreign policy dictated by the whims of war profiteering.

And what kind of influence
are we having in the Middle East? The rhetoric of 'bringing Democracy
to the peoples of Iraq and Afghanistan' would be laughable were it
not such a grandiose and destructive lie. The impact of American
intervention in these two countries has been disastrous.

“The
biggest source of corruption in Afghanistan,” one American official
said, “was the United States.” - New York Times79

The
New York Times article describes
how the CIA routinely funneled millions of dollars without oversight
in unmarked bags to the offices of President Hamid Karzai, while
simultaneously denouncing the Iranian policy of doing the exact same
thing. U.S. officials are quoted as saying that instead of buying the
loyalty of the Afghan President, the payments instead proliferated
into a vast web of corruption while Karzai became increasingly
defiant of U.S. interests.

In
Iraq, the country has devolved into near anarchy with monthly death
tolls from terrorism sometimes reaching the 1000's. In 2004, the New
York Times reported that there
was a massive assassination campaign targeting intellectuals and
professionals, with between 500 and 1,000 urban professionals killed
in just a 9 month span.80
From drive by shootings to stealth murders in the victims home,
officials in Iraq agree that there is a massive campaign to silence
the capable and educated.

“'They
are going after our brains,' said Lt. Col. Jabbar Abu Natiha, head of
the organized crime unit of the Baghdad police. 'It is a big
operation. Maybe even a movement.' These white-collar
killings, American and Iraqi officials say, are separate from -- and
in some ways more insidious than -- the settling of scores with
former Baath Party officials, or the singling-out of police officers
and others thought to be collaborating with the occupation. Hundreds
of them have been attacked as well in an effort to sow insecurity and
chaos. But by silencing urban professionals, said Brig. Gen. Mark
Kimmitt, a spokesman for the occupation forces, the guerrillas are
waging war on Iraq's fledgling institutions and progress itself. The
dead include doctors, lawyers and judges.”

In other words, Iraq is
being left without the very people who could have been future leaders
of democracy, and whom could have established a functioning society.
Shortly afterwords, a corporate friendly government was established.

Furthermore,
it is not empty rhetoric to say that the Iraq invasion was based on
lies. In 2012, the Iraqi defector responsible for the 'evidence' of
chemical weapon production in Iraq which was presented to the United
Nations by Colin Powell, who portrayed it is “facts and conclusions
based on solid intelligence”, confessed to BBC that his claims were
entirely fabricated.81Clearly
there is an agenda that does not mesh with the rhetoric!

Will the War on Terror ever
end? Who truly has the incentive to scale back the operation? Not
clandestine agencies or the military, who are seeing their budgets
increase year by year. Certainly not any of the major influences in
politics, banks and corporations, who are seeing massive profits from
government contracts and resource exploitation. And most certainly
not any politician in Washington, who virtually rely on the lobbying
of these organizations to keep their jobs.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald
put it succinctly:

“But
what one can say for certain is that there is zero reason for US
officials to want an end to the war on terror, and numerous and
significant reasons why they would want it to continue. It's always
been the case that the power of political officials is at its
greatest, its most unrestrained, in a state of war. Cicero, two
thousand years ago, warned that "In times of war, the law falls
silent" (Inter arma enim silent leges). John Jay, in Federalist
No. 4, warned that as a result of that truth, "nations in
general will make war whenever they have a prospect of getting
anything by it . . . for the purposes and objects merely personal,
such as thirst for military glory, revenge for personal affronts,
ambition, or private compacts to aggrandize or support their
particular families or partisans." If
you were a US leader, or an official of the National Security State,
or a beneficiary of the private military and surveillance industries,
why would you possibly want the war on terror to end? That would be
the worst thing that could happen. It's that war that generates
limitless power, impenetrable secrecy, an unquestioning citizenry,
and massive profit.” - Glenn Greenwald, writing for The
Guardian82

Greenwald also notes the
hopelessness of combating terrorism with further violence.

“Indeed,
virtually every person accused of plotting to target the US with
terrorist attacks in last several years has expressly cited
increasing US violence, aggression and militarism in the Muslim world
as the cause. There's no question that this
"war" will continue indefinitely. There is no question that
US actions are the cause of that, the gasoline that fuels the fire.

But
the notion that the US government is even entertaining putting an end
to any of this is a pipe dream, and the belief that they even want to
is fantasy. They're preparing for more endless war; their actions are
fueling that war; and they continue to reap untold benefits from its
continuation. Only outside compulsion, from citizens, can make an end
to all of this possible.”

Food for Thought:

How close of a relationship did the CIA
maintain with Osama bin Laden after Operation Cyclone?

Why does the United States consider
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, the two largest funders of terrorism, our
biggest allies in the region?

How closely does the CIA work with the
intelligence agencies of these countries?

How many agents does the United States
have operating in Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, and how many atrocities
are they responsible for?

Why have Al-Qaeda and the United States
fought on the same side of multiple wars?

Why have so few Al-Qaeda
been apprehended after over a decade of fighting the War on Terror
and millions of dollars spent?

Who has a monetary stake in
the proliferation of terrorism, and how much influence do they hold
in official U.S. Policy?

79New
York Times, “With
Bags of Cash, C.I.A. Seeks Influence in Afghanistan,” April
28, 2013. One particularly salient quote from the article is worth
sharing: “No one mentions the agency’s money at cabinet
meetings. It is handled by a small clique at the National Security
Council, including its administrative chief, Mohammed Zia Salehi,
Afghan officials said. Mr. Salehi, though, is better known
for being arrested in 2010 in connection with a sprawling,
American-led investigation that tied together Afghan cash smuggling,
Taliban finances and the opium trade. Mr. Karzai had him released
within hours, and the C.I.A. then helped persuade the Obama
administration to back off its anticorruption push, American
officials said.”

Free eBook

'Lifting the Veil: An Investigative History of the United States Pathocracy' now available for free download. I explore covert politics, historical conspiracies, elite pedophilia and trauma-based mind control to expose a covert network of psychopaths comprising an American 'Deep State'. Download for free hereRead embedded copy here

Enjoy this content? Consider a donation to compensate for the thousands of hours of research and writing. It takes 30 seconds of your time. $5 goes a long way towards accessing primary documents, obtaining rare books and more.
Donate Bitcoins