Latin America needs a revolution: a liberal and Catholic revolution

Liberation Theology is having a bit of a revival. Is this good? I am skeptical. The problem with the Left is that they talk and talk with all sorts of grand words but they don’t explain how to create wealth and lift people out of the poverty they lament. Liberation Theology is fraught with problems, and most of them, it seems, are not to be resolved with Christianity.

I saw this morning a piece at Acton’s blog which tackles this problem. It is longish, but I hope you, dear readers, will take two moments to read it through.

Leading proponents of liberation theology were not simply looking to curb external domination or implement piecemeal types of reforms. They called for a more-or-less socialist revolution. Indeed, as Novak demonstrates, theirs was not a lukewarm socialism or mild social democracy capable of coexisting with private property, markets, and democratic institutions. It was, to use Gutiérrez’s language, the radical doing-away with “private appropriation of the wealth created by human toil” and the abolition of the “culture of the oppressors.”

How did dependency theory [explained earlier] with its socialist-like proposals to solve poverty and the Marxist influence on liberation theology fuse together? One often hears disclaimers to the fact that not all dependency and liberationist writings were Marxist. This is of course true. Novak himself argued that “liberation theology forms a tapestry much broader than its Marxist part and is woven of many colors.” It is worth stating that the work of carefully distinguishing between the various theoretical foundations suited to liberation theology, as Novak and Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict XVI) did at the time, is not the same as trivializing the broader Marxist influences. There are some subtle differences between the Ratzinger-Novak caveat and other claims concerning the impact of Marxism. Some of these other assertions were that (1) classic Marxism had been revised or distilled by the seventies, (2) Marxism as an academic tool did not contradict Catholic dogma and doctrines, (3) the first Christian communities were proto-marxian, and (4) a “Christian socialism” that eschewed Marxist atheism and materialism was possible. In a scholarly analysis published in 1988, H. Mark Roelofs maintained that the differences between liberation theology and old-style Marxism could be explained in the following manner:

Liberation theology is not a Marxism in Christian disguise. It is the recovery of a biblical radicalism that has been harbored in the Judeo-Christian tradition virtually from its founding … [Do you buy that?] Liberation theologians turn to modern Marxism chiefly to gain a comprehensive understanding of contemporary class conflict and poverty.
In the face of such obvious equivocation – most notably, concerning whether it was possible to separate Marxist analysis from Marxism’s operating assumptions of atheism and materialism – Novak complained: “What no one clarifies is what is meant by ‘Marxist analysis.’” Novak went on to list seven elements in liberation theology that were present in much of the literature and decidedly Marxist in tone and content. These were (1) the effort of liberation theology seeks to create a new man and a new earth, (2) the espousal of a utopian sensibility, (3) the benign view of the state, (4) the failure to say anything about how wealth is created, (5) the advocacy of the abolition of private property, (6) the treatment of class struggle as a fact, and (7) the denouncement of capitalism. In Novak’s opinion, this worldview was not only theologically and morally wrong. It would result in Latin America paying a high economic and political price that would hurt the poor. [Again and again and again…]

A ‘Liberal’ and Catholic Proposal

When he looked ahead to how Latin America ought to be transformed, Novak was categorical: “Liberation theology says that Latin America is capitalist and needs a socialist revolution. Latin America does need a revolution. But its present system is mercantilist and quasi-feudal, not capitalist, and the revolution it needs is both liberal and Catholic.”

[…]

I would also like to remind you all of something that Sam Gregg wrote recently for First Things… alas, behind a paywall, but worth the (less-than a) cupp’o coffee price to get the mind working. HERE

12 Responses to Latin America needs a revolution: a liberal and Catholic revolution

There’s no question free markets are the more efficient and effective economic system.
Free markets with appropriate limits and social safety nets are the way to go.

The libertarian idealists take it too far. They want us to abandon concerns about income and wealth inequality.

One rhetorical trick they use it to direct focus on “lifting people out of poverty”. What does it matter, they ask, if some people get rich and if the middle class is beat down, so long as
others are “lifted out of poverty”? The middle class, once richer than the poor in Third World countries, becomes equal with them, a blow to the human ego. Yet the libertarians want us to be happy about this. They have little understanding of human psychology and the desire for status. They seem to think we shouldn’t care if a few Americans get very wealthy and the American middle class goes downhill. Just focus on “lifting people out of poverty.”

Alas the United States is becoming more of a morally bankrupt socialist leaning crony-capitalist state rather than a free-market capitalistic state to its detriment. At the present time almost half of our citizens are on the public teat, in some manner, and rising dependency rather than increased wealth are the trends.
We had the opportunity to bring in the adults to fix things and decided as a country to continue on this destructive path.
Oh well, the United States won’t be the first great empire the the Catholic Church has seen enter the dust bin of history, nor is it likely to be the last.

Revival? One swallow does not a spring make, and the recent reconsideration of Liberation Theology is not so much a revival as a reassessment of the movement that was. Liberation Theology has not been revived. Pope Francis’ criticisms of the world market are a far cry from Liberation Theology, and the old fires are basically embers.

In reading the piece, which was not half bad as far as it goes, I could not shake off the main problem, which Card. Ratzinger identified straight on, which is that you cannot talk about “Liberation Theology” as if it were a thing. It is many things–or was many things. A post by Father Zuhlsdorf here some months back distinguished the Brazilian strands of the movement from the Argentine “popular piety” variety. They are dramatically different things. There are some strands that gravitate all the way to the threshold of Marxism, yet there are bits that are honestly and earnestly Christocentric.

“None of the prominent liberation theologians influential in Latin America had significant training in or exposure to the discipline of economics,” Mr. Rodriguez begins. To me, that is a good thing. Because, at its best, the Social Doctrine of the Church is a subset of thought in our faith about how to practice our Faith, not a competing market theory to offer the world for how to materially improve the lives of the poor. I know that some of the Liberationist authors stray off to policy arguments, but that’s what the CDF corrections were about–how to get them back on track, because, as Card. Ratzinger wrote, some of the strands within the current of Liberation Theology were “valid.”

And that’s what the reassessment has been all about: to recognize that there was validity in the movement, and that part of it will endure, like Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum, Pius XI’s Quadragesimo Anno, and Pius XII’s Ad Ecclesiam Christi, which foreshadowed the advent of Liberation Theology when it called for the Latin American Church to develop her own formula, “with sound doctrine and incessant and proactive action, in the social arena” to ward off the advance of true Communism.

Latin America and the Spanish speaking Carribean countries need A LOT. To begin with, they need solidly Catholic leaders that know their faith and are well equipped to pass it on to the laity. There is much richness in the Catholic Church by saints, doctors, mistics, poes, councils, etc, but the Spanish translations done in the US really stink. They are succumbing quickly to the tidal wave of opinion based denominations.

I recall seeing on the news St John Paul II’s finger wagging rebuke (away from microphones but in full view of cameras) of certain priests caught up in liberation theology, after he alighted at a South American airport. At the time I was disappointed because, as a good little Marxist, I believed that liberation theology was an attempt to recapture some kind of original spirit of Christianity which had been corrupted over the centuries. I also believed at that time, and still do, that the corrupt, clientist regimes of South America were in dire need of being swept away, and I decry the degree to which certain clerics were in hoc to those regimes.

It is worth mentioning that ‘the communist hypothesis’ from its very genesis in the 1800s reinterprets the story of Christ as a proto-Marxian revolution of sorts, that essentially Christ was a revolutionary leader, not divine in any sense: more like a Socratic critic of the ideology practiced and expounded by the scribes and pharisees. Much is made, for example, of the apostles at Jerusalem holding “all things in common” (common… commonism… communism, geddit?)

But it remains the case that without its materialist basis and dialectical methods of interpretation (e.g. seeing agape-love as merely a ‘negation of the negation’ of Judeo-pharisaic legalism), Marxism becomes impossible to sustain as a theoretical edifice. Which is not to say that its content is necessarily sustainable otherwise, but it is certainly impossible to sustain on the basis of a sound theologically understood Christianity, as I myself have since discovered.

But still, let’s not deceive ourselves into thinking there is therefore something “right” about capitalism. It too is merely the teachings of men, theoretically founded on ideals and practices which are no less materialist, just as ‘free-standing’ (there is no great capitalist “truth of the world”), and as such is equally as corruptible and potentially abusive as any other political, social or economic theory. It may well produce incredible results, better than any other system invented: even Marx marveled at its power, and at some level he appears to accept it as the ‘fact of the world’ until such time as ‘historical necessity’ brought about capital’s own ‘eating of itself’ as it were (this is why he was never a revolutionary himself, he was too Hegelian). But capitalism also produces — by its own integral logic and not by virtue of some ‘corruption of true/pure capitalist doctrine’ — inequality, oppression and many other social ills. Communism may well be wrong — it is — but the problems it sought to address are real problems; they were in Marx’s day and they are today outcomes which capitalism produces directly. The problems of today’s capitalist world are indeed problems which capitalism causes, it makes no sense to deny these problems and it may well be dishonest of us to try to do so, whatever the wrongs of socialism and communism by comparison.

I am fairly certain that all of the ‘classical liberals,’ the intellectual founders of the movement in the 18th century, Adam Smith and John Locke, etc., were all very anti-Catholic Father. If one wanted the kind of revolution the author speaks of then they would be running two horses in double harness who would be constantly at war with each other.

In any case both of the ideologies capitalism and marxism, liberalism and liberation theology; both of them place way too much emphasis on the goods of this world and in turn create societies that are so obsessed with goods and problems that are solely related to material things while completely ignoring (in the case of capitalism) or actively combating (socialism) the supreme need of fallen man for the salvation of his soul. This grates on Catholic ears and hearts and has for 300 years now. There must be a better way.

with this piece I must disagree, if I’m allowed. Live in Argentina and can tell you, there’s no lib theology nor has there ever been, influencing anything here at least. Chapter aside goes to the continent in the 70´s when LAmerica was on fire, a boiling keetle, when the rest of the countries ecuador line above, had a hot cup of tea in their hands.

Fr Jorge Bergoglio had a tough time ‘piloting’ his priests back then, being himself a man of 34 if I’m not mistaken.

Back then the socialist fantasy was extremely tempting for the youth and priest of course, do not forget helping the poor was a Church mission, not the only one., and i mean real poverty, the kind Michael Voris mentiones in one of his ‘Vortex’: ?people eating out of garbage bags, not food stamps and poeple living in carboard boxes, not low income housing’

If you wish to look for an example, then I’m, sure you may find some, something in the line of :’how come this priest did or said that? why then did this bishop state that or not do this? I supponse you will, as you will do in your own countries.

THe only place I suspect this may have an influence could be Brazil where it sprung up like mushrooms, I met priests from there who are ‘soaked’ in lib theology. Curiously, these same priests, in one homily, speaking of abortion, called it ‘ the most abominable crime’. But It goes to show some things are firmly laid.

what Polycarpio mentions on Argentina’s Popular piety hits the nail right on the head, closely knit with the Social Doctrine of the Church :

‘A post by Father Zuhlsdorf here some months back distinguished the Brazilian strands of the movement from the Argentine “popular piety” variety. They are dramatically different things. There are some strands that gravitate all the way to the threshold of Marxism, yet there are bits that are honestly and earnestly Christocentric’

I remember the story of a priest, a jesuit, Lib theology priest all around, kidnapped by the military in the 70’s in Argentina when Francis was Provincial. This man was meant to wind up at the botton of the River Plate, as did many.These guys did not fool around, they even killed a Bishop and 5 Pallotines. Francis when he finally could find out where the man was, racing against time, which was the difficult thing because in the meantime they usually killed him, he questioned the officer in charge and said to him ‘ do you believe in hell? the officer, a ‘catholic’ replied ‘yes’, Francis said to him:’if you don’t release the Fr. that’s where you are going, straight to hell!’ The story was told by the rescued Fr. stating as I recalll that evethough he was a lib theology follower and Francis was not, he still steppped in and saved his life.

And recovered I. said:

‘I recall seeing on the news St John Paul II’s finger wagging rebuke (away from microphones but in full view of cameras) of certain priests caught up in liberation theology, after he alighted at a South American airport’

I remeber that too,that was Nicaragua’s Ernesto Cardenal, a priest…. He became a minister without resigning his priest’s appointment as he was demanded to do , reason why St. JP2 waved the finger at him.

So, in short,with a few exceptions,capitalism reigns in LA, but do not forget the scars that ‘our’ capitalism left on society are still hurting. It’s hard to see this with american eyes, because you may tend to think and apply the same set of rules and laws that ‘limit’ capitalist excess’ if such thing exists, but some things that take place down here are quite different.

these are some interesting comments from both St. JP2 and BXVI on the capitalism issue, taken from an old interesting article..

“Benedict:Both capitalism and Marxism promised to point out the path for the creation of just structures,” he said in 2007. “And this ideological promise has proven false.
Capitalism, Benedict continued, left a “distance between rich and poor” and is “giving rise to a worrying degradation of personal dignity.”
Pope John Paul II showed perhaps the most enthusiasm for capitalism of any pope, yet even he said, “There are many human needs which find no place on the market. It is a strict duty of justice and truth not to allow fundamental human needs to remain unsatisfied.” He warned against a “radical capitalistic ideology” that lacks an “ethical and religious” core.”

It is problematic just how much early Christian communities renounced ownership of goods. The letters of Paul, however, mention efforts to raise money for the church in Jerusalem. And so it’s easy to infer that whatever renunciation of goods existed in the Jerusalem community, there weren’t adequate goods for self support

There have been in the church poverty movements that were so radical that the foundation was the notion that matter is evil. These seem to end in bunga bunga parties.

It must be noted that Marxism, despite any social justice concern or romance with Christian renunciation of goods, is based on denial of Natural Law, including the natural right to property.

GK Chesterton’s comment that too much capitalism means too few capitalists is telling. Historically, big time capitalists have tended to try to control the market rather than keep it free.

Nb: the natural right to property is relative rather than absolute.

There are many other erroneous concepts in Marxism, including the priority given to economic forces in social organization, the mutually exclusive concepts of capital and labor, and class conflict (taken up by certain dissenters in the church, e.g., women’s ordination).

Liberation theology often includes these errors, but adds one that is Hegelian: It attributes political movements that are by definition natural to the supernatural, ie the Holy Spirit. I was surprised to have read this in Gutierriez- – a Dominican should know better

Another issue found in some liberation theology is the fusion of the concept of the base community with New Testament criticism hostile to the supernatural. Thus early Christian communities are considered to have lacked not only the Eucharist but any notion of Christ the Redeemer. Instead, they are thought of as communities sharing goods, loving each other, blah blah blah

Search Fr. Z’s Blog

Search for:

BACK TO SCHOOL SHOPPING? Please, come here first!

Enter Amazon through my search box and I will get a small percentage of what you spend. (Pssst - Can't see the search box? Turn off your "ad-blocker" for this site!)Amazon.com WidgetsPS: I added Amazon Search Boxes for the UK and for Canada at the bottom of the blog page. Copy and paste titles I mention into those boxes and - BAZINGA! - results appear as if by magic.
Kindle? HERE

“This blog is like a fusion of the Baroque ‘salon’ with its well-tuned harpsichord around which polite society gathered for entertainment and edification and, on the other hand, a Wild West “saloon” with its out-of-tune piano and swinging doors, where everyone has a gun and something to say. Nevertheless, we try to point our discussions back to what it is to be Catholic in this increasingly difficult age, to love God, and how to get to heaven.” – Fr. Z

Some words of wisdom…

The more vigorously the primacy was displayed, the more the question came up about the extent and and limits of [papal] authority, which of course, as such, had never been considered. After the Second Vatican Council, the impression arose that the pope really could do anything in liturgical matters, especially if he were acting on the mandate of an ecumenical council. Eventually, the idea of the givenness of the liturgy, the fact that one cannot do with it what one will, faded from the public consciousness of the West. In fact, the First Vatican Council had in no way defined the pope as an absolute monarch. On the contrary, it presented him as the guarantor of obedience to the revealed Word. The pope's authority is bound to the Tradition of faith. … The authority of the pope is not unlimited; it is at the service of Sacred Tradition.

CLICK and say your Daily Offering!

"We as Catholics have not properly combated (the culture) because we have not been taught our Catholic Faith, especially in the depth needed to address these grave evils of our time. This is a failure of catechesis both of children and young people that has been going on for fifty years. It is being addressed, but it needs much more radical attention... What has also contributed greatly to the situation is an exaltation of the virtue of tolerance which is falsely seen as the virtue which governs all other virtues. In other words, we should tolerate other people in their immoral actions to the extent that we seem also to accept the moral wrong. Tolerance is a virtue, but it is certainly not the principal virtue; the principal virtue is charity... Charity means speaking the truth. I have encountered it (not speaking the truth) many times myself as a priest and bishop. It is something we simply need to address. There is far too much silence — people do not want to talk about it because the topic is not 'politically correct.' But we cannot be silent any longer."

Help Monks in Wyoming (coffee) and Norcia (beer)!

出る杭は打たれ!

Without you, there is no blog.

There is a subscription form at the bottom of this page!

Aedificantium enim unusquisque gladio erat accinctus.

- Nehemiah 4:18

"Where priest and people together face the same way, what we have is a cosmic orientation and also in interpretation of the Eucharist in terms of resurrection and trinitarian theology. Hence it is also an interpretation in terms of parousia, a theology of hope, in which every Mass is an approach to the return of Christ."

"In those situations where homosexual unions have been legally recognized or have been given the legal status and rights belonging to marriage, clear and emphatic opposition is a duty. ... If all Catholics are obliged to oppose the legal recognition of homosexual unions, Catholic politicians are obliged to do so in a particular way, in keeping with their responsibility as politicians." CDF 2003

One of the most dangerous errors is that civilization is automatically bound to increase and spread. The lesson of history is the opposite; civilization is a rarity, attained with difficulty and easily lost. The normal state of humanity is barbarism, just as the normal surface of the planet is salt water. Land looms large in our imagination and civilization in history books, only because sea and savagery are to us less interesting.
— C. S. Lewis

For contemplation…

"Latin is a precise, essential language. It will be abandoned, not because it is unsuitable for the new requirements of progress, but because the new men will not be suitable for it. When the age of demagogues and charlatans begins, a language like Latin will no longer be useful, and any oaf will be able to give a speech in public and talk in such a way that he will not be kicked off the stage. The secret to this will consist in the fact that, by making use of words that are general, elusive, and sound good, he will be able to speak for an hour without saying anything. With Latin, this is impossible."

- - Giovanni Guareschi

Support them with prayer and fasting.

Click for Car Magnets

Help the Sisters. They have a building project. Get great soap (gifts, etc.) while helping REAL nuns!

Some OBLIGATORY reading…

Leave Voice Mail for Fr. Z

Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.

WDTPRS

020 8133 4535

651-447-6265

Let us pray…

Grant unto thy Church, we beseech
Thee, O merciful God, that She, being
gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may
be in no wise troubled by attack from her
foes.
O God, who by sin art offended and by
penance pacified, mercifully regard the
prayers of Thy people making supplication
unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of
Thine anger which we deserve for our sins.
Almighty and Everlasting God, in
whose Hand are the power and the
government of every realm: look down upon
and help the Christian people that the heathen
nations who trust in the fierceness of their
own might may be crushed by the power of
thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ,
Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee
in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world
without end. R. Amen.

Check out the Cardinal Newman Society feed!

Yes, Fr. Z is taking ads…

A great hymnal…

Mystic Monk Coffee also has TEA!

Because it matters what children read…

I carry one of these super-strong rosaries in my spare mag pouch! The Swiss Guards have them too!

The Swiss Guard have these rosaries!For the story clickHERE and HERE (esp. 18:00)

Because you don’t know when you are going to need to move fast or get along without the supermarket…

My wish lists

Main Wishlist Kindle WishlistAudio WishlistHam Radio ListNEW

Food For Thought

“The legalization of the termination of pregnancy is none other than the authorization given to an adult, with the approval of an established law, to take the lives of children yet unborn and thus incapable of defending themselves. It is difficult to imagine a more unjust situation, and it is very difficult to speak of obsession in a matter such as this, where we are dealing with a fundamental imperative of every good conscience — the defense of the right to life of an innocent and defenseless human being.”

For your consideration…

"One of the most dangerous errors is that civilization is automatically bound to increase and spread. The lesson of history is the opposite; civilization is a rarity, attained with difficulty and easily lost. The normal state of humanity is barbarism, just as the normal surface of the planet is salt water. Land looms large in our imagination and civilization in history books, only because sea and savagery are to us less interesting."

- C.S. Lewis

More food for thought:

“I expect to die in bed, my successor will die in prison and his successor will die a martyr in the public square. His successor will pick up the shards of a ruined society and slowly help rebuild civilization, as the church has done so often in human history.”

Francis Card. George

Fr. Z’s stuff is everywhere

Please follow me on Twitter!

Help support Fr. Z’s Gospel of Life work at no cost to you. Do you need a Real Estate Agent? Calling these people is the FIRST thing you should do!

They find you a pro-life agent in your area who commits to giving a portion of the fee to a pro-life group!

"It will never be known what acts of cowardice have been committed for fear of not looking sufficiently progressive."

Charles Pierre PéguyNotre Patrie, 1905

"If I ought to write the truth, I am of the mind that I ought to flee all meetings of bishops, because I have never seen any happy or satisfactory outcome to any council, nor one that has deterred evils more than it has occasioned their acceptance and growth."

St. Gregory Nazianzus
ep. 131 - AD 382

“We will conquer your Rome, break your crosses, and enslave your women. If we do not reach that time, then our children and grandchildren will reach it, and they will sell your sons as slaves at the slave market.”

Reading and gift ideas!

READER DONATIONS FROM…

To set up a recurring, monthly donation via PAYPAL (even a small one) go to the bottom of this blog and look for the drop down menu! If you prefer, I also have a clearXchange account. Do you want yet another alternative to PayPal? I have set up an account with
CONTINUE TO GIVE
Get a link to donate via CONTINUE TO GIVE using your smart phone.
SEND MESSAGE:
4827563
TO:
715-803-4772
They take a larger percent taste, but they are an alternative.

I remember benefactors in my prayers and periodically say Mass for your intention.

This catechism helped to bring Fr. Z into the Catholic Church!

Be a “Zed-Head”!

Fathers, you don’t know who might show up! It could be a “big fish” of one sort or other…

And... GO TO CONFESSION!

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

What people say…

"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."

- Kractivism

"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"

- Michael Sean Winters

"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."

- Anna Arco

“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”

- Comment

"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."

- Sam Rocha

"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."

- Comment

"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."

- Anonymous

Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD

- Comment

Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.

Support Military Chaplains!

Click to donate

Food For Thought

“Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites. . . . Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere; and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters.”

Canadian Amazon Search Box

More stuff…

Archives

ENTRY CALENDAR

Do you use my blog often? Is it helpful to you?

If so, please consider subscribing to send a monthly donation. That way I have steady income I can plan on, and you wind up regularly on my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I periodically say Holy Mass.

Some options

Admin Stuff

The opinions expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect the positions of any of the Catholic Church's entities with which I am involved. They are my own. Opinions expressed by commentators in the comments belong to the commentators.