[The Medical lie'Herd immunity' is trotted out by vaccinators to promote high vaccination
levels for increased 'protection', but the real reasons
are--- avoiding having many healthy unvaccinated kids to show them up (High
vaccination drive), and more kids vaccinated means more money, it's a
Cash Cow
(see
Money incentive, bribery).
It is easy to prove it's junk science with the numerous fully vaccinated
populations coming down with the disease, see
below and Failures (vaccine).]

[2014
May] Vaccines Exposed: Herd Immunity Is Just Another Word For Cash Cow!
According to the current Illinois General State Aid fiscal schedule,
Illinois schools receive $6,119 per student from the state. Ten percent
of this amount equates to roughly $612. So if a school has 2,000
students, for instance, and it maintains at least a 90 percent
vaccination rate, it will receive $12,238,000 from the state per year.
But if the vaccination rate falls below 90 percent at the same
school, a whopping $1,223,800 will be shaved off this amount

QuotesThe validity of herd immunity undergirds all compulsory vaccination
policies. The theory of herd immunity posits that when a sufficiently high
threshold of people in a community is immune to a specific disease, it creates a
protective effect, a barrier of sorts. Society achieves herd immunity when this
protective cordon prevents a resurgence of the disease and, as a result,
protects vulnerable individuals who cannot receive vaccines (or whose vaccines
failed).
After the conference, I approached James Colgrove, PhD, an
expert in the history and ethics of public health from Columbia University. I
complimented him on his 2006 book State of Immunity and asked for
clarification. His book reveals that the term “herd immunity” first appeared in
1923. He describes data limitations and the difficulty in validating the theory
empirically. He quotes one official saying, in 1932, that herd immunity was “a
mere hypothesis.” I asked Colgrove for subsequent evidence-based research
upholding the soundness of herd immunity. He mentioned epidemiological studies
on measles in the 1960s and 1970s that provided corroboration. I challenged
him.
As explained to me by pediatrician Larry Palevsky, the
original basis for herd immunity had nothing to do with vaccines. When
sufficiently high numbers of people contracted the wild form of the disease and
secured lifelong natural immunity, statisticians observed a protective effect in
the community as described above. Policymakers eager to promote vaccines
sought ammunition to increase vaccine uptake. Researchers assumed that
vaccine-induced immunity would operate in the same manner as natural immunity
and presumed that vaccines therefore would also create herd immunity. I am not
a scientist but I know that vaccine-induced immunity is not remotely the same
thing as natural immunity. Natural immunity is the gold standard.
Vaccine-induced immunity is qualitatively different; for starters, vaccines do
not always work and their protection wanes over time. Colgrove admitted as
much, and I just stood there for a moment, stunned. We clearly need more
inquiry into this critically important subject. However, it does not take
scientific brilliance to understand this key point: discredit herd immunity and
the house of cards supporting vaccine mandates comes tumbling down.

One of the grand lies of the vaccine program is the concept of
"herd immunity." It is based on the idea that if a certain percentage of the
population is immunized against an infectious disease, epidemics can be
prevented. The exact percentage changes, mainly, in my opinion, to suit the
vaccine manufacturers. In the beginning it was 68 percent, but now some are
calling for 95 to 100 percent immunization to reach these goals. We are
constantly told, and many doctors believe, that herd immunity has prevented
epidemics from occurring in modern America. Unfortunately, there is very little
evidence of this for a number of reasons. .....vaccines for most Americans
declined to non-protective levels within 5 to 10 years of the vaccines. This
means that for the vast majority of Americans, as well as others in the
developed world, herd immunity doesn't exist and hasn't for over 60 years.

The belief in herd immunity leads to many delusions. One of them is that when
the number of immune people in a community drops below a certain point, it will
make the next epidemic come sooner. In 1976 in Britain the vaccination rate for
whooping cough dropped from 76% to 42%, because there had been publicity of bad
side effects from the vaccine. The medicrats expected that the drop in the
vaccination rate would make the next whooping cough epidemic come sooner, as
well as expecting it to be worse. The whooping cough bacteria paid no attention
to human theories, and the disease followed the usual timing of its natural
cycle of virulence. Medicrats expressed surprise that the epidemic did not come
sooner. There were also fewer cases and fewer deaths during this epidemic. The
much lower vaccination rate of 42% made no difference to the long term decline
of whooping cough, which had been happening for a hundred years.[2005] Raising A Vaccine Free Child by WENDY
LYDALL

"In October, 1972. a seminar on rubella was held at the Department of
Pathology, University Department, Austin Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Dr. Beverly
Allen, a medical virologist, gave overwhelming evidence against the effectiveness of the
vaccine. So stunned was she with her investigations that it caused her, like a growing
number of scientists, to question the whole area related to herd immunizations. Dr. Allen
described two trials: the first trial concerned army recruits who were selected because of
their lack of immunity as determined by blood tests. These men were given Cendevax, an
attenuated rubella virus that is supposed to protect. They were then sent to a camp which
usually has an annual epidemic of rubella. This occurred three to four months after they
were vaccinated, and 80% of the so-called immune recruits became infected with rubella
virus. A further trial shortly after this took place at an institution for mentally
retarded people with similar effects. Additional disturbing evidence was sent to us
by a Melbourne GP who was in the United Kingdom at the time that Chief Health Officer Sir
Henry Yellowlees, had released a press statement (February 26, 1976) informing doctors
that, in spite of high vaccination figures, there had been no detectable reduction in the
number of babies born with birth defects."--Dr Archie
Kalokerinos & Glen Dettman
"Does Rubella Vaccination Protect?," Australian Nurses Journal, reprinted in The
Dangers of Immunisation p54

"The reason vaccinations are promoted with such intensity is to
prevent people from realising that vaccines do not protect and also in the event of an
outbreak or an epidemic the vaccinated are as much at risk of becoming infected as the
unvaccinated. The truth can be kept hidden if people's vaccination status remains
unknown and if everyone is vaccinated, making a comparison with unvaccinated people
impossible. This is also the real reason for the relentless push to vaccinate as
many children as possible."-- Dr Buchwald (The Decline of Tuberculosis despite
"Protective" Vaccination by Dr. Gerhard Buchwald M.D. p101)

Peter Flegg says, "The only reason
more children do not die of measles in the UK is that herd immunity is still
sufficiently high to protect those who cannot or have not been fully immunised."
That is not entirely correct in my
opinion. A site called Measles Initiative
says that (7), "Measles is a leading killer of children in many developing
countries for several reasons. Children are already compromised with poor living
conditions, they are infected at very young ages when their immune systems are
not strong, malnutrition is rampant in many homes, and many families do not have
access to medical care to treat measles and its complications. Measles, itself,
does not kill children. Instead, complications from measles attack the child's
already weak immune system. Measles attacks the body, inside and out. It is
similar to HIV in the sense that when it knocks down the immune system, the
child becomes susceptible to the myriad of diseases that fester in poor living
conditions." Do children in the United Kingdom
have the same living conditions as children in Africa? ----Hilary Butler[Letters BMJ Becoming Ben Oct 2008]

“The largest measles epidemic in North America in the last
decade, occurred in 2011 in Quebec, Canada, where rates of 1- and 2-dose vaccine
coverage among children 3 years of age were 95%-97% and 90%, respectively, with
3%-5% unvaccinated.”

“Among adolescents, 22% had received 2 vaccine doses.
Outbreak investigation showed this proportion to have been an underestimate;
active case finding identified 130% more cases among 2-dose recipients.”

“The vaccination coverage among cases was at least 84.5%.
Vaccination coverage for the total population was 99.0%. Incomplete vaccination
coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.”

“A total of 235 cases of measles-like symptoms were
reported; 218 were diagnosed as measles. Thirty-six of these cases were in
unvaccinated individuals; 182 occurred in previously vaccinated subjects.”

Its all over the news, the internet and the newspapers.
Largest whooping cough outbreak in 5 decades....go get vaccinated and protect
your children...oh my...thats the LAST THING you should do. Heres why.

CONCLUSIONS:
Our data suggests that the current schedule of acellular pertussis vaccine doses
is insufficient to prevent outbreaks of pertussis. We noted a markedly increased
rate of disease from ages 8-12 years, proportionate to the interval since the
last scheduled vaccine. Stable rates of testing ruled out selection bias. The
possibility of earlier or more numerous booster doses of acellular pertussis
vaccine either as part of routine immunization or for outbreak control should be
entertained.

An acellular whooping cough vaccine actually enhances the
colonization of Bordetella parapertussis in mice; pointing towards a rise in B.
parapertussis incidence resulting from acellular vaccination, which may have
contributed to the observed increase in whooping cough over the last decade.

Data Reveals Measles Outbreaks Have Nothing to Do With
Non-Vaccination Trends

Article excerpts: If the measles outbreaks in California,
and particularly in and around Orange County, as well as New York City are
because of non-vaccinators, then why aren’t we seeing outbreaks of everything
not being vaccinated for? Why just measles and why all of a sudden, when the
number of people opting out of vaccinations has actually steadily dropped in the
last few years – after an initial wave of people not doing it?

Non-vaccinators in NY are .1-1% of the population. In
California we are talking 1.1-2%. Why aren’t we seeing increases in outbreaks in
Vermont, Michigan and Oregon where the rate is over 6%? Correlation (or worse
yet, public perception of correlation), is not causation: whether it’s vaccines
and autism, or whether it’s a tiny number of people not vaccinating, and a few
places having measles outbreaks.

What does the data show on measles in the states where
opting out of vaccination trends the highest? There was an instance in Oregon
last year, and one this year with a 6% rate of opting out in the state. A child
in Washington County, Oregon who developed measles on an overseas trip and
exposed hundreds of people in the Portland area. Add to that one case in Oregon
this year where a child contracted measles from a vaccinated adult.

2,000,000 plus cases of autism ASD diagnosis are currently
estimated to exist in the US. What are the economic aspects to this, and as well
the impact of hardship for families that need to care for and provide for these
children, and individuals? Top it off insurance is not paying for clearly
working and successful biomedical treatment, nor other things that are needed to
truly help recover children with ASD. Why is that? it is because to do so would
be to direct admit that vaccines were the cause. Why? Because all to obviously
these children would not be healing and recovering if it were anything other
than the vaccines. they are detoxing the vaccines and providing needed
supplements, dietary changes, and protocols that work with the amazing self
healing body, given the right means. Pharma thinks none of that can happen
without them and their exclusive control, and will not let it happen. Profit and
control of all information, is their continued game.