On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> On 8/21/02 7:38 PM, "Steven Caswell" <steven@caswell.name> wrote:
>
> > I can somewhat see the need for construction for tools
> > that require a bean (which a utility class really isn't), but I think
> > other compromises, such as a wrapper class, would also be reasonable.
>
> Do you want to maintain that wrapper class?
This is the main reason why the wrapper class it not possible. Each
Commons project with a Utils class would need to commit to maintaining
wrappers for bean-using projects.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>