i've been reading this thread and wondering if i shoul reply at all...but, what the hell...

i have a friend, and she has "prescient" dreams...she has, on more than a few occasions, correctly foretold future events, such as 9/11, etc etc.

anyway, the evening of the murders, before it was announced via media outlets, she said she had a dream that 2 men actually killed nicole and ron...neither of them OJ....although she says he was present. she said she woke up, saying to herself "what a weird dream", then she watched the news the next day.

i know it sounds way out there, but i do believe in the power of dreams to fortell future events, i believe that my friend does not lie about her abilities, and i also believe that the manner in which those two were murdered would be almost impossible for one man with arthritis and bad knees to commit by himself.

I would expand on what #941060 said and say that your friend is actually guilty of 3000+ counts of first degree murder. If she had the information and did not come forward, then she is guilty of complicity in the attacks.

I've had those sorts of dreams too. Nothing specific (or important) but I recognized the event when it happened. It just means that I can imagine something in my sleep that could happen. Just like I can imagine all kinds of crazy things that won't happen (e.g. illegally rescuing two-week-old kittens out of piles of kitten skeletons [dunno how they could become skeletal in under two weeks] and having to feed them ants).

*His blood found all over the crime scene while he was still in Chicago, where he had fled the night of the murder, so it could NOT have been "planted", because police did not yet have a sample of his blood.

*His blood drops also found in a trail on the left side of the bloody footprints leading away from the scene (he was found the day after the murders to have had a bleeding knife wound on his left hand).

*His and the victims' blood in the footprints on the floor of his car, all over the car seats, and in a trail leading up his driveway, into his bedroom, and on articles of his clothing.

*Carpet fibers from his car in Nicole's throat wound.

*Department store receipts proving that he owned the gloves, and photos of him wearing them.

*Photos of him wearing the rare and expensive shoes that left the crime scene footprints, which also happened to be his size. If I recall, only around 300 pairs of those shoes were ever produced, worldwide; even fewer in his size, 12.

I have prescient dreams all the time (I blame it on too much spice when younger) but i never warn anybody because I like to fuck ppl over. The only thing I use my prescience for is to set my VCR up in advance to catch accidental nipple slips on TV.
]
Take that, Human race!

Seriously, why? There are dozens of murders in the country every day, all rather horrible so, why O.J.? Did his time as a strong running back and mediocre actor make his murder case more psychically prominent than all the other murders in the world?

OJ was super guilty...
Its just that the crime scene was ruined by shitty police work. We learn it now and teach it to new students who learn any forensics as a way of telling people not what to do.

*His blood found all over the crime scene while he was still in Chicago, where he had fled the night of the murder, so it could NOT have been "planted", because police did not yet have a sample of his blood.

The problem was police "lost" his blood for a while.

*His blood drops also found in a trail on the left side of the bloody footprints leading away from the scene (he was found the day after the murders to have had a bleeding knife wound on his left hand).

Which filled up a glove, which the police LOST and replaced with one that did not fit. The police basically ruined this one again.

*His and the victims' blood in the footprints on the floor of his car, all over the car seats, and in a trail leading up his driveway, into his bedroom, and on articles of his clothing.

The problem here was that the police did not cordon the area properly. There were pictures of journalists touching the crime scene/police men sitting in his car (for lolz).

*Carpet fibers from his car in Nicole's throat wound.

Again the problem was that they portrayed the cops as incompetent. This was real evidence (to be fair so was the rest but the police were so hellbent on putting him in jail they contaminated evidence willingly IMHO when it was a simple cut and shut case)

*Photos of him wearing the rare and expensive shoes that left the crime scene footprints, which also happened to be his size. If I recall, only around 300 pairs of those shoes were ever produced, worldwide; even fewer in his size, 12.

This was sadly a plant. Again, bent cops rather than sensible people. Its the whole how do you cross a blood soaked floor.

On your tip toes, the footprints here were flat rather than how someone would normally walk. Unless he was so used to blood...

Basically HE WAS GUILTY. There is mindboggling amounts of evidence without having to fake more. The cops did not do their job properly. OJ is "guilty" but not based on what evidence the cops "produced" since some of it was bad.

"I have prescient dreams all the time (I blame it on too much spice when younger) but i never warn anybody because I like to fuck ppl over. The only thing I use my prescience for is to set my VCR up in advance to catch accidental nipple slips on TV."