A BNSF train of crude oil tanker cars. BNSF Railway said earlier this month it has the capacity to move a million barrels a day out of the Bakken play in Montana and North Dakota. (Christopher Muller photo)

A BNSF train of crude oil tanker cars. BNSF Railway said earlier this month it has the capacity to move a million barrels a day out of the Bakken play in Montana and North Dakota.(Christopher Muller photo)

Canada’s oil patch is quietly sending large new volumes of oil on rail cars, even as it fights to overcome mounting opposition to plans for new pipelines to the U.S. Gulf Coast and Canada’s West Coast.

Though solid numbers are not available, industry sources say upward of 80,000 barrels a day of Canadian oil is now moving to market on rail cars. It’s a small fraction of the 2.3 million barrels a day the country exports, overwhelmingly by pipeline. But rail is rising fast: last year at this time, some 5,000 barrels a day left Alberta on trains. By next year, executives, oil producers and energy traders estimate it will exceed 200,000 barrels a day.

A Canadian Pacific Railway freight train runs along the Bow River and distant Rocky Mountains on the main line near Lake Louise, Alta.
LARRY MACDOUGAL/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Interview

Autos

The rise of rail comes as the industry scrambles to gain better prices for Canadian oil, which has suffered deep discounts because of overstuffed pipelines and over-supplied U.S. Midwest markets. A new pipeline takes years to build, but with rail, an oil company can send product to new markets in days with portable train-loading equipment. The new destinations that companies are now accessing – the Gulf Coast, U.S. Northeast, California and Central and Eastern Canada – offer better prices that are directly boosting profits in Alberta.

But the speed of industry’s embrace of rail, which is set to move as much next year as a mid-sized pipeline, also suggests a much broader shift is under way. As more oil moves on trains, it stands to supplant the need for new pipelines, whose construction has grown increasingly difficult.

The motivation for moving by rail is clear. Depending on the day, companies can fetch between $10 (U.S.) and $30 more per barrel by selling their oil in new markets, especially along the coasts where it receives a higher international price.

Trains stand to be a permanent, rather than temporary, option for the oil patch.

It’s a likelihood even Enbridge Inc., the largest carrier of Canadian oil by pipeline, has acknowledged, saying that at least 10 per cent of domestic crude – perhaps as much as a quarter – could move by rail by 2035. Without rail, Enbridge warns, either major new pipelines will have to be built, or “the alternative for the Western Canadian crude producers is shut-in.”

The Enbridge analysis is conservative, suggesting rail won’t pick up significant volumes until 2018. But that has already begun, and is set to pick up substantially next year.

Canadian National Railway alone has increased its number of loading sites to 14 from three. CN expects to average nearly 50,000 barrels a day of oil in rail cars this year. Competitor Canadian Pacific Railway recently boosted its forecast to over 100,000 barrels a day next year – a quantity it originally expected to hit in 2014 – although much of that is U.S. oil from North Dakota. “It is developing very quickly,” said Tracy Robinson, a vice-president at CP, who believes “there is a permanent place for rail in the crude market.”

In the U.S., rail is moving at a breakneck pace. BNSF Railway said earlier this month it has the capacity to move a million barrels a day out of the Bakken play in Montana and North Dakota. Some of that is coming back into Canada, as a broad range of producers and refiners join the rail ranks. Rail also offers the possibility of international exports that don’t need new pipelines such as Northern Gateway. Some companies, for example, have begun examining exports to Europe through Atlantic Canada ports accessible by rail.

At the same time, the price disadvantage of rail is diminishing.

“The cost of rail versus pipe isn’t hugely significant these days, especially now with the increased regulations and delays on pipelining,” said Crescent Point Energy Corp. chief executive officer Scott Saxberg. “We see it being in the $2 a barrel range.”

Topics

Next story

| Learn More

Discover content from The Globe and Mail that you might otherwise not have come across. Here we’ll provide you with fresh suggestions where we will continue to make even better ones as we get to know you better.

You can let us know if a suggestion is not to your liking by hitting the ‘’ close button to the right of the headline.

Restrictions

All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters is not liable for any errors or delays in Thomson Reuters content, or for any actions taken in reliance on such content. ‘Thomson Reuters’ and the Thomson Reuters logo are trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.