User talk:Cajek/Archive7

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Contents

I just looked at your review for * Gradius and you didn't even give half of the information that I gave you in my last interview...so how can you blame me for being a crappy reviewer when you didn't even review half of the stuff in that review?
--Razorflame 03:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, Gradius was absolutely terrible with no help of redemption. THAT'S the diff. -- Le Cejak•<-> 03:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

YOU still didn't do the things that you said I should, and that is: "HELP the user make it a better article." You should do that with Gradius...--Razorflame 03:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Jesus, keep forgetting my siggy :()

@Cajek: Not to sound like a douche or anything, but "Gradius was absolutely terrible with no help of redemption" is a rather douchey thing to say and sort of defeats the purpose of pee review. "Review" is defined as "An account intended as a critical evaluation of a text or a piece of work." Accordingly, you should evaluate, not mock. Please refrain from flaming other users.

@Razorflame: I can't help but feel as if I'm missing something when it comes to "Gradius." What exactly is it satirizing/parodying/blantantly copying? If nothing, and it's just meant to be as patent nonsense (as suggested by the template on the bottom), then there is really no need for review, as the primary purpose of review is to improve upon an article, something that generally requires the elimination of nonsense.

Thank you for your kind review on my UnNews. It was my first UnNews, and I am going to get a picture, the only problem is, I don't know how to insert pictures with captions into my article. Maybe you could help me? Jesus fucking CHRIST!!! WHY DO I KEEP FORGETTING MY DAMN SIGGY!?!?! --Razorflame 16:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Could I get you to review either of my 2 reviews that I am currently waiting for? Thanks. -Razorflame 15:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Could I get a review for any of my 3 articles that I am currently waiting for a review on? -Razorflame(contributions)Talk 01:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I've just been through several pages and have found that people don't have very good grammar here. I've just spent the last 10-15 minutes correcting mistakes (unless they were intentional) in articles..you digging what I'm saying? -Razorflame 18:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

It may be a boring job, but people will notice the job you're doing. Big people. -- Le Cejak•<-> 18:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Just saw the dancing Zoidberg when I was dumping that WhotM template on your userpage - good luck with that, by the way, you deserve to follow in Lj's footsteps there - anyway, yeah, dancing Zoidberg: like it. That's it, nothing more to say and I'm about to shut my PC down and leave the office. Toodles! --SirUnderUser(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 16:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

You barely improve it since I reviewed it, and you ask for a re-review? Tch, tch, tch, Cajek. Anyways, I went ahead and repaired what I could. HansJohnsonas in "keep ya hans off my"(cover your eyes!) 21:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

I really don't think that article writing is my forte here....I think maybe I could just do proofreading and additions to already written articles, but I really don't think that I have what it takes to write full-fledged articles on here yet...what do you think? -Razorflame(contributions)Talk 15:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I made templates for two months before I wrote my first article. -- Le Cejak•<-> 20:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

But, do you think that I even have enough writing talent to even GET better at writing these kinds of articles? -Razorflame(contributions)Talk 20:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Gee, I'm pretty nosy. I'd just like to say that there are a lot of really great users here that have never written a featured article. Just remember that not everything you write has to be featured. Just write for the fun of it, and when something is FA-quality, it'll eventually get noticed my the right people. In the meantime, you can try to improve your writing by reading this and/or this. Also, there are plenty of other ways you can help the site; Special:Newpages is always full of crap that needs QVFDing or ICUing. Simple maintenance stuff like that is always helpful. Just remember, it's a comedy site, whatever you do, have fun with it! - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs)20:39, Nov 9

lol, I wish there was a pee review page for the inherent talent. That would be the sickest thing on here. Do I think you have enough talent? Dude, just write in your namespace (User:Razorflame/article) and just troll around Uncyc fixing stuff. It's what I did at first. I saw pages I thought were funny, or just sentences, and I expanded. Also, I read alot. Interesting stuff. That's a good start. Start trolling pee reviews and see what works and what doesn't. Once you think you've got the hang of "what's funny and what's not" sit down and think of a funny article (or just let it come to you). HANG IN THERE, MAN! -- Le Cejak•<-> 20:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I just want an article to be funny. I don't think that many of my more recent articles have been even funny....-Razorflame(contributions)Talk 20:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

A whole bunch of my articles suck, but because I've written so much people don't notice. -- Le Cejak•<-> 20:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Good idea....

I'm thinking about creating a new subpage of my userpage for short UnNews articles, like the News in Brief section of the Onion. They would be short and sweet satircal articles that would be funny. Maybe this is a good idea? -Razorflame(contributions)Talk 20:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I've already created the page. If you want to write any UnNewsInBrief articles, then just go onto my userpage and navigate to the page. You can then post it yourself. Please make sure to follow the instructions that I put onto the page. Thanks. -Razorflame(contributions)Talk 20:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I've just added a new UnNewsInBrief article in the page that I told you about earlier. Maybe you could have a look at it and tell me if you think it would be worth making into a full fledged UnNews article? -Razorflame(contributions)Talk 21:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

No need to give the guy a short review just because he gave you one. I prefer to demonstrate how a real reviewer does it, then request a bit more. Just a friendly suggestion. ;) - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs)23:57, Nov 9

Good point. Should I go back? Le Cejak•<-> 00:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Maybe let him know that you're gonna review it again, this time fo' rizzles on the page with a note like "not very helpful, is it?" That might help to get your point across. Otherwise, yeah, prolly go back and give him a real review. Sometimes you have to turn the other cheek, be the bigger man, etc. Any analogies to buttrape there were intentional. - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs)00:08, Nov 10