On the other hand, the prosecution will attempt to prove that the actions of Mr. White went past his rights in the first amendment due to the nature of the information that he dealt with and therefore he should be punished in accordance to the law. The other legal issue that may be faced in this trial has to do with the matter of jurisdiction. This is to say that whether the prosecution can prove in what jurisdiction was the alleged crime truly committed and whether the accused can be prosecuted according to the laws of that jurisdiction. This is because the said crime was committed over the internet (also known as cyberspace) and thus one may argue that the traditional laws that hold individuals in physical locations should not be applied to those involved in cyberspace as technically they are two different jurisdictions (Lessig, Post & Volokh).. This is because the internet has the ability to connect people all over the world thus one cannot truly say what section of people are truly affected by information that has been posted on to the world wide web. Another legal issue that may be encountered during this trial is the issue of incitement. This will also be one of the charges that the prosecution will most likely try to accuse the defendant with on the grounds of his posts. The prosecution will try to prove that Mr. White did more than just offer his opinion on a subject but as a matter of fact, in the process of doing so was also attempting to incite the members of his audience into

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Princess Diana and Milly Dowler incidents play an important role in changes of media laws and regulations. The paper attempts to describe those events in light of the part played by journalists in death of Princess Diana and Milly Dowler. The paper also discusses changes in the media regulations due to stemming of these events and describes preventive measures that have been taken by British government to ensure safety of their people.

While trying his best to make sense of the lecture, he became frustrated and yelled “Fuck history. I hate history and all this bullshit. I don’t even know why we need to learn this shit. I am damn sure that our government is bunch of corrupt fools.” Entire class burst into laughter except our history teacher.

The events in the local community, nation and world are achievable from newspaper and this is why it is a pivotal source of information. In olden times newspaper was the main form of information about events to people. It gives information about all segments of community like social, political economical and entertainment.

In essence, media press has been at the core of these controversies and debates given that it is the major means of communicating to the public. Generally, press freedom refers to the liberty and free choice granted to various communication outlets such as electronic and print media to communicate and express events, news, information, criticism and opinions (Barendt, 2009).

This is a common misconception. Some people think they have the right to say whatever they want to or about whomever they choose without fear of legal retribution. This is not true. The First Amendment defines freedom for the U.S. separating it from many other nations that do not allow free speech but not all speech is protected, an important distinction among other aspects of speech this discussion will investigate.

Amendment IV of the United States Constitution provides for defense against awkward search or arrest, in addition to calling for a judicially issued warrant that is also sustained by probable cause. This part of the bill of rights that regulates on invasion of privacy is, however, only applicable to searches or arrests conducted by the government but not those done by private organizations or individuals.

Freedom of expression not only encompasses the rights to freedom of speech and freedom of the press, but also the right to assemble as well as to appeal to the government in case of complaints. The First Amendment, which was implemented in 1791, stated that the congress would not create any law respecting formation of religion, or barring the open exercise thereof; or shortening the openness of speech, or of the press; or the moral of the citizens peaceably to collect, and to request the Government for a redress of complaints.

Will Espinoza be successful in her defense? Why or why not? 2. Analyze YouTube’s argument that it has complied with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Remember to provide any legal precedent or other evidence that YouTube can use in its defense. Will YouTube be successful in its defense?

The law is the instrument by which governments govern, while ethics is what guides the journalist in the practice of printing and broadcasting.
Ethics is a value system based on sensibility and vision as determined by human experience and reinforced by the superego.

It gives them the right to make public opinions, news and information without any meddling from the government. It grants people the right to gather and march in public, demonstrate, protest and carry signs to express their

3 pages (750 words)Essay

action by posting the type of material that he did on his blog. The issue of slander will also come up during the court case as the prosecution will no doubt state that by giving his opinion on the judge in question, he did it in a manner that painted the victim in an unfairly negative light (Lessig, Post & Volokh).. The prosecution may argue that the accused made the judge seem incapable of performing his job to a sufficient capacity and as a result unnecessarily dragging his name through the mud. Once the case goes to trial, it will be unlikely that Mr. White will be successful in defending his innocence by using the First Amendment rights in his argument. Though the first amendment offers it protection to people so that one is able to speak their mind without the fear of negative repercussions, there are also limits to the freedom of speech that is offered to a citizen. In a rough conclusion, the first amendment allows one to say what they want as long as their actions do not cause harm or risk doing so to another individual in the process (Lessig, Post & Volokh). In the case of Mr. White and the judge involved, this cannot be said to have been the case. This is because the blogger’s comments may have in actuality put the life of the judge at risk especially with phrases such as “this judge should be killed” and “the judge’s blood is a tiny price to pay to guarantee freedom for all.” Which seem as if the writer is not only condoning an act of violence on the judge should one happen, but is actually promoting it by calling it a “tiny price” and a guarantee for freedom to all. These words cannot be seen as the mere opinion of an individual but a move of incitement that may have put the judge’

Summary

s Instructor Date First Amendment Hypothetical (Law & Ethics of Digital Media) There are a number of legal issues that are relevant in the case against Fred White and are bound to be dealt with in a trial. The first issue is the topic of free speech/freedom of expression and the boundaries that an individual has when exercising this right…