“We’re continuing to negotiate with the principals, or, if dissatisfied, we will take legal action that will be typical of any harmed shareholder,” he said on Monday. A spokesperson for Nymex declined to comment on the scope and extent of negotiations.

Last Thursday, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, a New York law firm, filed a class action suit on behalf of Optionable's stockholders, after the news broke of Optionable's involvement in massive commodity losses by the Bank of Montreal (BMO).

Nymex paid approximately $27 million for a 19% stake in Optionable on April 10, and acquired warrants of up to 40% in the firm. Two weeks later, its biggest customer (BMO) reported C$680 million pre-tax commodity trading losses, causing Optionable shares to nosedive. BMO has since suspended its business relationship with the brokerage and is investigating the extent of its involvement in the recent commodity trading losses. Nymex resigned its representation on the board on April 14, stating it was “actively reviewing the situation” and aims to “avoid potential conflict of interest during our review.”

This white paper looks at the Basel Committee's BCBS239 principles, also known as PERDARR (Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting), which comes into force from 1 January 2016.