Vaccine Facts

February 18, 2018

The February Issue of Mississippi Christian Living Magazine features a spread titled, "Vaccines -- Yes or No?," where Dr. Anita Henderson and Dr. Scott Guidry answered questions posed by the magazine concerning vaccines.

The magazine is to be commended for boldly publishing an article featuring discussion from both sides on the topic of vaccines. This is an important discussion that needs to happen and articles like this go a long way toward normalizing the conversation.

Parents are increasingly apprehensive of blindly trusting the medical establishment and most now question vaccine safety. They are desperate for information, but some are too timid to ask valid questions because of a false perception that the topic is unacceptable or too polarizing to dare bring up. It isn't. Vaccines affect our children, and we must be able to have this discussion.

Please take note that one of the doctors sited sources. We are hopeful that parents and other health care professionals who are paying attention, will be judicious and continue to ask questions and research vaccines.

Vaccine critical people often times have a mass of evidence to show their point

The vaccine religious have sound bites and they often don’t do any research at all -Dr. Suzanne Humphries

The thousands of families behind Mississippi Parents for Vaccine Rights are especially grateful to Doctor Scott Guidry for his bold honesty concerning vaccines and their lack of safety science as well as his brave dedication to advocating truth and the principle of voluntary, informed consent. Dr. Guidry is not alone, of the nearly 300 new members who joined MPVR in January, a quarter of them work in the health care field.

The magazine also features the MPVR advertisement seen above. You deserve the right to prayerfully decide how to vaccinate your child. MPVR will continue to champion religious vaccine rights legislation; you are invited and encouraged to join us here!

January 16, 2018

Mississippi, the unhealthiest state in America, has the highest vaccination rates. Paul Offit, one of the vaccine industry’s most strident ambassadors, wonders how the state of Mississippi, which has “the worst overall health in the nation,” achieves over 99.4% vaccine coverage? The real question, however, is why, when despite juxtaposing two critical pieces of health information about Mississippi’s children—high vaccine coverage and poor health rankings—Offit does not ask the obvious elephant-in-the-room question: Could one have something to do with the other?

Read the full World Mercury Project article, full of research linking chronic disease to vaccines, here.

For years, the parents of this state have been begging on the Mississippi State Capitol steps to be released from the fascist vaccine laws they have lived under for decades.

Mississippi legislators look to and consult with medical trade organizations who pad their campaign accounts, and profit from vaccines.These organizations echo that we are "first in this one good thing" and finally "doing something right."

Except, they are very, very wrong.

Families are leaving our beautiful Mississippi and refuse to move here to live under our draconian vaccine laws.

Parents report, and statistics show, that Mississippi's children are sick and disabled.

Meanwhile, lawmakers in Jackson have been sitting passively by while our state is destroyed.

"Curtailing Constitutional and parental rights is the wrong approach. Instead, in the words of one researcher, the U.S. needs to 'reassess its current general vaccination program' and admit that the nations 'excessive' vaccine schedule is 'dangerous [and] irresponsible.'"

The families of Mississippi are counting on their lawmakers to fix our burdensome vaccine law by supporting Representative Andy Gipson's Religious Vaccine Exemption bill. Please help us save Mississippi from further negative effects of inflexible vaccine mandates.

September 24, 2017

Behold, children are a heritage from the LORD, the fruit of the womb is a reward -Psalm 127:3

The Bible is clear in teaching us that our children are a gift from God. As far back as Genesis 4:1 we find Eve declaring that her son Cain had been given to her by God. The children God gives to us are his good gifts to us, entrusted as a stewardship from Him.

For decades now, Mississippi's oppressive vaccine law has been an obstacle between parents who seek and rely on discernment from the Holy Spirt concerning how they vaccinate their children and their inability to vaccinate as they are led.

Help us champion religious vaccine rights legislation that would give parents in Mississippi the fundamental rights they must have in order to be good stewards of the children God has entrusted to them.

Which vaccines contain human protein and DNA?

The information in this table is drawn from vaccine package inserts downloaded from the FDA website. The Vaccine Ingredients Calculator, following the lead of the package inserts, treats each source of human protein and DNA as a distinct ingredient.

A CBS News Investigates article quotes a former senior scientist at a pharmaceutical firm who claims that human tissue is currently used in 23 vaccines; however, we adhere strictly to the vaccine package inserts from the FDA as our ingredient data source and cannot confirm nor deny this claim.

That is not all. More babies continue to be sacrificed.We continue to kill some babies to theoretically keep other babies from contracting a treatable and/or non-deadly disease.

"Due to dwindling capacity for existing aborted fetal cell lines to self-replicate, scientists in China have developed a new aborted fetal cell line, WALVAX 2 that will be used for viral vaccine production. The existing cell lines, MRC-5 and WI-38 are currently used in MMR, Varicella, Hepatitis-A, Shingles, some rabies and some polio vaccines." -Children of God for Life

Where did the human protein and DNA come from?

There are three main sources of human protein in vaccines: (1) fetal cell lines, (2) human albumin derived from human blood and (3) human albumin genetically engineered from yeast.

The human DNA in vaccines comes from the MRC-5 fetal cell line (see below).

Human Protein from Fetal Cell Lines

The MRC-5 cell line was developed in September 1966 from lung tissue taken from a 14 week fetus aborted for psychiatric reasons from a 27 year old physically healthy woman.

The WI-38 human diploid cell line was derived by L. Hayflick from normal embryonic (3-month gestation) lung tissue of a female.

The rubella vaccine currently used in the United States and in most countries was developed after an American researcher at the Wistar Institute cultured rubella virus from a fetus aborted because the mother was infected with rubella. This vaccine is called RA 27/3 because the rubella virus was isolated from the 27th aborted fetus sent to the Wistar Institute in the 1964 rubella outbreak.

This article, while incomplete regarding the sources of human protein/DNA and the vaccine in which they are found, attempts to explain why some vaccines are grown in cell cultures that were originally obtained from human fetuses. http://www.immunizationinfo.org/issues/vaccine-components/human-fetal-links-some-vaccines

Genetically Engineered Human Albumin

Currently (as of April 2011), only the MMR vaccine contains genetically engineered human protein, which is produced under the brand name Recombumin and referred to as "recombinant human albumin" in the package insert. http://www.immunizationinfo.org/issues/vaccine-components/human-fetal-links-some-vaccines

Human albumin derived from human blood

The package inserts do not contain any information about where the human blood is sourced from.

This table includes not only vaccine ingredients (e.g., adjuvants and preservatives), but also substances used during the manufacturing process, including vaccine- production media, that are removed from the final product and present only in trace quantities. In addition to the substances listed, most vaccines contain Sodium Chloride (table salt).

All reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this information, but manufacturers may change product contents before that information is reflected here. If in doubt, check the manufacturer’s package insert.

____________________________________________________________Vaccine mandates violate the religious liberty of parents in Mississippi. Please join MPVR here today and help us champion religious vaccine rights legislation that would give parents in Mississippi the fundamental rights they must have in order to be good stewards of the children God has entrusted to them.

To begin with, we are doing 6 slots each day on SuperTalk's Gallo show . Thursday, Tuesday and Wednesday (during our lawmaker's morning commute). One 60 second & one 30 second ad will play each hour.

We are working on additional scripts for ads to run on Christian stations as well and we will continue to run ads based on giving. If this is something that excites you, please give what you can. Remember that $5, $10 & $20 donations add up. No amount is too small.

Check out the two ads we've created so far in the video below. They are informative, call our lawmakers to support vaccine rights legislation and include a plug for MPVR.org.

Thank you all in advance for helping us make this happen! Together, we are a force!

Mississippi Parents for Vaccine Rights has been hard at work tirelessly to get Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe to theaters across the state. We are both thankful and thrilled to announce that Vaxxed is coming to a theater near you in August. View the Official Vaxxed trailer:

Vaxxed: From Cover Up to Catastrophe has played to packed theaters across Mississippi.

Madison, MS | Malco Grandview Theatre

• Sold Out | MOVED TO A LARGER SCREEN: Tuesday, August 16 at 7:30pm SOLD OUT!

(We are working to bring Vaxxed to a theater in the Gulf Coast Region.)

The fraudulent CDC science that Vaxxed brings to light only confirms our state's most rigid, oppressive vaccine law in the nation MUST be changed. We now know it is scientific fact that the MMR vaccine is causing autism in some children when it is given according to the CDC and Mississippi mandated schedule. This is unacceptable moving forward and must stop.

If you are able, please buy an extra ticket or two and invite someone who NEEDS to see this film. It is imperative that we get those who are not yet advocates of health freedom and vaccine truth into the theaters. Invite friends, family members, and church leaders. Urge your pediatrician/nurse/doctor and certainly your lawmakers and their spouses.

Ultimately this film, turned movement, is a tool to share long-hidden truth; every Mississippian needs and deserves to see it.

June 29, 2015

Are you concerned about children who are under-vaccinated according to the CDC schedule attending school with children who are fully vaccinated? If so, please consider this.

Below is the list of childhood vaccines given in 1983, before the government decided to protect drug companies and doctors from liability for death or injury due to vaccines. See National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act . Both drug companies and health care providers involved in the vaccination of a child cannot be held financially accountable in a civil court of law for death or injury due to vaccination even if there is a product defect or negligence involved.

The list in the second column is the CDC schedule of vaccines children receive in 2015, and that continues to expand with no end in sight. Click the image to view full sized:

Think about it. For almost four decades vaccine manufacturers have enjoyed both government mandates that guarantee the uptake of their products, as well as a cocoon of protection from liability unique only to the vaccine industry.

How many of these vaccines have most adults had?

How many adults are adequately boostered every two years? Five years? Ten years?

When was your last pertussis booster or your child's teacher's last pertussis booster?

What about the lady at the checkout in Walmart?

In fact, the pertussis vaccine is effective for only 2 years. Chicken Pox and others also need frequent boosters in order to provide any possibility of protection.

If we as adults want to require others to risk hyper-vaccinating their vulnerable infants and children, then is it not only fair that we roll up our sleeves to the same as well? Is it morally responsible to expect our most vulnerable little ones to bear the load of protecting the "greater good"?

As for the model of herd immunity, clearly the majority of the population is walking around largely un-vaccinated for most everything we are mandating children be vaccinated for.

Herd immunity is pure marketing by corrupt big pharmaceutical companies to create fear and urgency among parents to require ALL children to be vaccinated for everything on the schedule, regardless of how large the schedule becomes.

If the adult population isn't being boostered every two, five, or ten years for most if not all these diseases, then the herd immunity model sinks like the Titanic.

It is a false notion to believe that only vaccinating little ones creates herd immunity. Ask any cattle farmer.

January 25, 2015

Breaking in 2014: The truth about a CDC researcher blowing the whistle regarding CDC data, Merck’s MMR vaccine and the studies conducted that revealed that black baby boys may be at 340% greater risk for developing autism when getting the MMR vaccine before age 3. The MMR vaccine is currently mandated to be given at 12 months and again at 4 year old.

The third whistleblower -- a senior CDC scientist named William Thompson -- only indirectly blew the whistle on Merck. He more blew it on himself and colleagues at the CDC who participated in a 2004 study involving the MMR vaccine. Here, the allegations involve a cover-up of data pointing to high rates of autism in African-American boys after they were vaccinated with MMR. In what could be high-profile House hearings before Congressman Posey's Science Committee -- hearings made all the more explosive given the introduction of race into the mix -- Merck could find itself under unprecedented scrutiny. The CDC still stands by its study although Frank DeStefano, the CDC's Director of Immunization Safety and a co-author in the CDC study, also stated that he plans to review his notes with an eye to reanalyzing the data.

From an e-mail Dr. Thompson allegedly wrote on October 18, 2002 to Melinda Wharton. "I am writing you once more regarding the recent Department of Justice (DOJ) request for a broad range of documents associated with MMR, thimerosal, and autism. I first spoke with you on September 3rd of 2002 regarding the sensitive results we have been struggling with in the MADDSP MMR/Autism study."

Further on in the e-mail Thompson wrote, "I don't think anyone has broken the law but I was extremely uncomfortable when Dr. Coleen Boyle, a coauthor on our paper, was required to testify before Congressman Dan Burton's committee in April of 2002 regarding MMR and autism. My level of concern has also caused me to seriously consider removing myself as an author on the draft manuscript."

On February 2, 2004, Thompson wrote a letter to Dr. Julie Gerberding, head of the Centers for Disease Control. It began, "We've not met yet to discuss these matters, but I'm sure you're aware of the Institute of Medicine Meeting regarding vaccines and autism that will take place on February 9th. I will be presenting the summary of our results from the Metropolitan Atlanta Autism Case-Control Study and I will have to present several problematical results relating to statistical associations between the receipt of MMR vaccine and autism."

The CDC’s DeStefano acknowledges that he and his study co-authors changed their study analysis plan midstream, which resulted in reducing the statistical vaccine-autism link among black boys. But he says they did so for good scientific reason.

“[Vaccine] exposure around [three years of age] is just not biologically plausible to have a causal association with autism,” DeStefano says. “I mean autism would’ve already started by then…it probably starts in the womb. So I think from a biological argument, it’s implausible this was a causal association.”

The issue is highly-charged for several reasons: public health officials fear that the public will panic and stop vaccinating if they believe there are links between vaccines and autism. That could lead to resurgence in serious infectious diseases.

Also, vaccination is a multi-billion dollar global industry that employs law firms and public relations agents to engage in a variety of high-powered PR efforts. These efforts include: lobbying members of Congress to prevent hearings exploring vaccine safety, holding private meetings with news executives to discourage reporting on vaccines and autism, and financing nonprofits which take favorable positions on vaccine safety issues. Because pharmaceutical companies that produce vaccines spend millions of dollars each year buying advertising on television, print and online, critics argue they may be given undue influence over content of the reporting media.

Pharmaceutical interests and their surrogates routinely falsely portray scientists and journalists who investigate vaccine safety as “anti-vaccine.” In his statement, Thompson emphasizes his safety concerns do not reflect an “anti-vaccine” mentality.

Ms. Attkisson’s reported in a blog on her website August 29: This week the CDC in response to a query stated that it is not currently investigating the relation between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). “Further, CDC does not have any planned research addressing vaccines and autism,” said a CDC spokesman.

“CDC believes that this topic has been thoroughly studied and no causal links have been found. Current CDC ASD related research focuses on determining how many people have ASD and understanding risk factors and causes for ASD.”–CDC spokesman

Ten years ago (February 2, 2004), Dr. Thompson expressed concerns about the study’s findings in an urgent letter to CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding; he broke protocol to contact her directly, instead of going through his immediate supervisor. Of the upcoming Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2004 meeting on immunizations and autism, he wrote “I will have to present several problematic results relating to statistical associations between the receipt of the MMR vaccine and autism.” He received no reply from Dr. Gerberding and he was removed from the IOM speaker schedule days before the meeting. The 2004 IOM report, which did not include his findings, was cited by the Omnibus Autism decision that denied 5,000 families compensation for vaccine injury claims, and the report continues to be widely cited for exonerating vaccines’ role in causing autism.

The CDC's final agreed-upon protocol came out for this particular study on September 5, 2001, and in that particular protocol they said they would consider race among the entire population. They called race a co-variant, and that’s just a term that’s used in statistics for a secondary variable, but they said that race would be used within the entire population.

Special thanks to Judy Brasher, retired CRNA, for her research and reporting on this!

October 15, 2014

We hear more and more stories regarding the lack of informed consent and the overreach of medicine into our children's schools and our own workplaces. This is one such story happening in McComb, Mississippi, shared by Rebecca Carter.

As I unpacked my daughter's school bag during the first week of October I found a letter about the school’s FluMist School Vaccination Program. The letter stated that the local Children’s Clinic had teamed up with our private school to help immunize the students against the flu. It stated that a consent form was attached so that parents could review and agree to have their child vaccinated while at school on October 16.

I discovered that there was no Vaccine Information Sheet included so I made a phone call to the school the following Monday. The headmaster was out, but was able to speak with the elementary principal. I explained to her my concern that there was not an Information Sheet sent home with the concent form. I told her that for a parent to engage in informed consent that the information must be presented to that parent before they can consent. I asked her to please have the Vaccine Information Sheet sent home with a new consent form, and to do away with the consent forms that were previously signed.

The principal also mentioned to me that she didn’t know what I’d want to do with my daughter that day since it was a live virus and she wondered about her being around WC, my son who was previously immunosuppressed. That opened an opportunity for us to discuss shedding and how that was a major concern of mine as well. I also shared with her that the school being liable if a reaction occurred was another real concern of mine.

A day later, a new notice showed up in the school bag. More FluMist Information…well, not really.

The school sent home another FluMist consent form but this time is was from the State of Florida’s Department of Health. (A perfect example as to why the school shouldn’t try to run a medical facility.)

The principal must not have understood what I was asking her to include. So, I did what I’m good at and I took matters into my own hands. I went to the local Children’s Clinic and requested the FluMist Vaccine Information Statement for the FluMist that would be given at the school. The nice lady at the counter promptly returned with the information and then I asked her why this information wasn’t given to the parents in the first place? This time she promptly went and found some help.

Another lady approached the counter. She commented that she didn’t know why they (the school) do not send out the Vaccine Information Statement with the consent form. Even when I asked her if it was the Children’s Clinic’s duty to provide this information for the parents since the clinic would be the ones administering the vaccines she said, “no, they (school) do all of the paperwork, we just go out there and do it (administer vaccine) as a courtesy for them.”

What I discovered later was that the information that had originally been sent home in my daughter's bag was actually sent from the Children’s Clinic. The nurse at the Children’s Clinic clearly stated on several occasions that the school was the one responsible for the information that was sent to parents, yet the letter was signed, ****** Children’s Clinic. I hate that I didn’t realize this while I was at the clinic so that it could have been addressed properly.

What I learned from my visit to the Children’s Clinic was that they are very unconcerned with making sure parents know what the risks are before having their children vaccinated. The nurse there did her best to put the blame somewhere else.

Nevertheless, I took the FluMist Vaccine Information Statement to the school and presented it to the elementary principal. She looked it over and agreed to send it out to all of the students and even thanked me for bringing it to her. However, it hasn’t shown up in LC’s school bag yet and it’s the Tuesday before vaccination day on Thursday.

My main concerns from the very beginning with this situation were:

Does the school have the students’ best interest in mind?

Have they provided the proper information for the students’ parents to make an informed decision?

Is the school prepared to handle an adverse reaction situation if it were to occur at the school?

Has the school provided the proper information to protect it from liability?

Shedding!

Schools are supposed to be a place where we send our children to get an education.Schools are not medical clinics and vaccines should not be administered in schools where the students’ do not have a parent present.

I highly doubt the school’s readiness to handle an adverse reaction situation were it to happen. The reason that I am doubtful is because most people think that it will not ever happen “here” until it actually does. In my opinion, if the school continues to offer the FluMist program, eventually someone will have an adverse reaction.

So far, I do not believe that the school has provided enough information for parents to make an informed decision. They may have provided the minimum information necessary to meet informed consent, but this is our children that we are talking about. In this case, we parents deserve more than the minimum. I believe that if a child has an adverse reaction after receiving the FluMist vaccine at my child’s school, the parents are going to be at that office demanding an explanation as to why they weren’t provided with information about possible risks of the vaccination.

I don’t think the school has really thought about the potential risks that this could bring upon the students. It is my prayer that they would reconsider.

Shedding, a topic that was brought up to me by the principal herself, is also something that the administration has clearly not thought through. If they had, they would realize the potential risks of contracting the flu virus even for those who chose to forgo the vaccine itself.

Rebecca Carter is a wife, mom and vaccine rights advocate who despite forgoing the FluMist vaccine for her own children went out of her way to make certain that other parents had the information they need in order to provide true informed consent. MPVR received reports from several parents regarding this issue. We are horrified that a children's clinic together with a private school would act so carelessly and irresponsibly regarding the children in their care.

_____________________________

Did you know, regarding FluMist?

Shedding is real. FluMist is a live vaccine. Take a look at the above package insert. This is taken from the insert from the vaccine that will be administered at Parklane Academy tomorrow.

What this table means is that among children age 6 months to 17 years, who received FluMist, between 1-7% of them were shedding the live virus through nasal secretions for up to 28 days post vaccination.

The insert warns about transmission to "immunocompromised household contacts."What about classmates?Children in a school setting spend 7-8 hours together in close quarters, five days a week. Many of these children have allergies and asthma and other immune conditions that make them more vulnerable to infections.

Don't parents have a right to know other children are contagious and are spreading the flu? AS A RESULT OF GETTING THE VACCINE! I'd go so far as to say that recently vaccinated children should stay out of the classroom until they are no longer contagious.

Also form that same insert:

...clinical significance that delivered doses were detected in the brain stomach and lungs of ADULTS is unknown.

...has NOT been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or its potential to impair fertility.

Well then.

90% of those who die from influenza are over 70 years old. If you are 69 or younger, your chances of dying from the flu are something like 1 in 100,000. Meanwhile, there are close to 100 flu-vaccine deaths reported annually, and the reporting system (VAERS) is dysfunctional. The real number is likely over 1,000 annual flu-vaccine deaths.

We are talking about preventive medicine here. Shouldn't preventive medicine be MORE safe than the thing it is supposedly preventing?

Of course, we cannot give medical advice, our goal is simply to arm parents with knowledge...to present the failures that are most often omitted from the informed consent equation. To make others think.

On a personal level, because there are risks in administering vaccines, I would certainly never consider allowing any vaccine to be administered to my child without being present. Should there be an adverse reaction, I would want to be there to access it, comfort my child and see to it that he/she got the attention needed at that moment in time.

Remember to that neither drug companies nor the doctors/nurses etc. can be sued when something bad happens as a result of vaccination.

October 14, 2014

Remember this article we blogged earlier this month where McComb's local newspaper editor spoke in favor of vaccine mandates using much misinformation to justify his stance? Well, our CoDirector, Lindey Magee responded to him with her thoughts on the matter.

Editor Jack Ryan contacted her to let her know he would run her letter stating that while he does support mandatory vaccination, "I must say that 49 of them seems a bit much." He stated he thinks people should hear both sides. We agree! Vaccine propaganda and fear mongering has seen front and center stage for far too long. So long, in fact that we in Mississippi have found ourselves with no parental vaccine rights while the state continues to add mandates with no end in sight.

We are thankful that Lindey's thoughts on the matter were published and hope many of you will also send letters to your local paper. Just as her words prompted Mr. Ryan to consider that our current schedule may "a bit much." So can YOU spread this TRUTH in the same way.

And to those who do support mandatory vaccines, but think 49 doses a bit much, well, you can't have it both ways. You cannot sit by and tolerate a mandated vaccine program that shoves 49 doses of 15 vaccines into children before kindergarten, but follow that up with "it may be a bit much." or "I'll never let my child get the Gardasil or Flu or Ebola vaccine" ...because there is NOTHING stopping those from becoming mandated tomorrow.

It's too many too soon with more being added because collectively not enough have boldly stood and said NO MORE! I beg of you...GET INTERESTED; help us fight for our rights here in Mississippi. Our children deserve better.

Now, we urge you to get right on penning your own letter to your local newspaper. Lindey has sent many emails to her editor over the past year. Persistence pays off, and not much is more worthwhile than fighting for our rights to parent our children, right? That begins with educating people as to what is going on in our state. So many just aren't aware. Once they are though, they too are most typically NOT okay with Mississippi's archaic vaccine law.

October 01, 2014

October first marks the first day of Vaccine-Injury Awareness Month. Yes, Vaccine Injuries are that prevalent. We wish that were not the case.

We want to share some things today about the Hepatitis B vaccination in particular:

• Children born in the United States are the most highly vaccinated children in the world.

• Infants born in the United States are almost THREE TIMES as likely to die before their first birthday than infants born in Finland, Japan, and Sweden.

• The US ranks below EVERY OTHER COUNTRY in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) when it comes to the Infant Mortality Rate (IMR).

• FULL TERM, healthy weight babies born in the US are TWICE as likely to die as infants in Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark, and Norway.

• These healthy, full-term United-States-born infants are at INCREASED risk of DYING between 1 month and 1 year of age.(This is not about preemies. It is not about infants born too early or at low birth weight. It is not about low APGAR scores. This is referring to healthy, robust babies who are DYING at double the rate of other developed countries before their first birthday!

...please pay attention:

• Infants in those other countries receive less than 50% of the number of vaccines in their first year of life as compared to infants in the United States.

• Infants born in other countries (Sweden, Norway, Japan, Finland, Switzerland, Denmark), who have a greatly increased probability of living past their first birthday, do NOT receive the Hepatitis B Vaccine.

• The HepB vaccine contains 225 micrograms of aluminum! That is nearly 10 times the amount allowed by the FDA to be given to ADULTS over a 24-hour period in IV medications.

Why are we vaccinating American babies on the first day of life? WHY? Why are we vaccinating them again at 2 months with 8 doses of vaccines and again at 4 months and again at 6 months? WHY?

OUR CHILDREN ARE RECEIVING 49 DOSES OF 15 VACCINES BEFORE KINDERGARTEN ...beginning with the HepB vaccine on their FIRST day of life!

HEPATITIS B is mandated in MS for children to attend daycare and public or private school....it is a vaccine that protects against a sexually transmitted disease…it is a vaccine that typically wears off in 10 years…it is a vaccine whose package insert lists:

Vaccines have been ruled "unavoidably unsafe" yet vaccine manufacturers and doctors enjoy 100% liability immunity when a person/child is injured or killed.

Billion dollar pharmaceutical companies CANNOT BE SUED when one of the 25 people (reported to VAERS) since 2013 die from this mandated shot. The HepB vaccine is responsible for the lupus death of a Mississippi girl, Tambra Harris in 2009.

As you will see this month, many parents active with our group have children who have suffered vaccine injuries of varying degrees. When these parents have another child, they simply desire to delay or omit a vaccine or vaccines that are responsible for often tragic outcomes in their older children.

Currently, the state of Mississippi's archaic, outdated vaccine law requires children first be vaccine injured before a parent can begin the uphill, long battle to secure said child from further damage. THAT IS BARBARIC!

MS Parents simply want OPTIONS! We are due the same fundamental rights parents in 48 other states have.