Commenting Rules

Readers are welcome to post comments on the material posted here, but some simple rules apply:

No trolls allowed

I reserve the right to refuse comments.

This site is meant to express my point of view. If you are looking for a soapbox to promote your own views, create your own website or blog site.

Comments should be brief (preferably under 100 words), polite, constructive and informed.

Comments which are simply attacks on myself, or are done in bad taste, or use rude language, or are possibly defamatory will not be posted.

You must state your full name to have your comments posted.

I may reply to some of your comments but will not be able to respond to all.

Needless to say, not everything found in the comments posted here are points of view I approve of or agree with.

If you are happy to abide by these rules, then by all means, send in your comments. Happy writing!

Rebutting the Vines’ Deception

Jul 4, 2015

I don’t usually like to draw undue attention to apostates, to wolves in sheep’s clothing, to false teachers, or to those who are clearly demonically deceived. But let me do so here, since some of this deception gets a wide hearing and deserves to be rebutted.

I refer to one big time wolf who is managing to deceive many gullible believers with his pro-sodomy theological revisionism. He of course gets a free run with the secular media, but sadly also with clueless wonders in the Christian world. The Bible warns plenty about the fate of those who engage in lies and deception.

But his recent piece is getting lots of attention so let me share some responses to it. I refer to Matthew Vines and his quite recent piece, “40 questions for Christians who oppose marriage equality”. It will cause many more believers to stumble, so it deserves a careful response.

But let me provide a quick bit of background first. On July 1 evangelical writer Kevin DeYoung wrote a terrific piece entitled “40 Questions for Christians Now Waving Rainbow Flags”. It really is quite an important piece, so please have a read of it (see link below).

As a rebuttal to DeYoung, Vines penned his piece on July 3. On the same day two excellent replies to Vines appeared. I refer to “Time for a Little Q & A” by Douglas Wilson and “A Believing Response to Matthew Vines’ 40 Questions” by James White. Both are superb and deserve a very wide hearing.

Since I am a firm believer in not reinventing the wheel, let me simply allow these two experts to do the talking, since they have so thoroughly, convincingly and biblically rebutted all his errant nonsense. I could be tempted to add a few remarks of my own, but I will refrain.

I will not feature all 40 questions here. Many of them are real howlers. As one person rightly remarked, “Vines is simply appalling. That he has such a flawed view of the history of slavery and wastes 3 questions on whether the earth revolves around the sun tells us how muddled his thinking is”.

Or as Wilson rightly notes, “What I want to do is either answer Matthew’s questions, or explain why I will not take the bait of answering a particular question. Put another way, I will answer the questions, but not the loaded questions.” Here then are some of Vines questions, with replies by Wilson, White or both:

2. Do you accept that sexual orientation is highly resistant to attempts to change it?Wilson: Yes, it certainly can be. But this is true of all sin, and true for all of us. The Christian life is described in Scripture as a life of mortification. “For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live” (Rom. 8:13). This is certainly true for those seeking to put their same sex attractions to death. But it is also true of all the rest of us. John Owen put it well when he said that we should not think we make any progress in godliness if we do not walk daily over the bellies of our own lusts.White: As is pedophilia, bestiality, desires toward incest, serial adultery, all sorts of forms of fornication, addiction to pornography, kleptomania, inveterate rage and anger, and addiction to gossip. “But such WERE some of you….”

7. Do you accept that lifelong celibacy is the only valid option for most gay people if all same-sex relationships are sinful?White: Again, I reject the category of God-created “gay people.” Experiencing life-long SSA (without any external factors bringing this about), though I believe it to be a minority experience, would in fact require lifelong celibacy.

9. What is your answer for gay Christians who struggled for years to live out a celibacy mandate but were driven to suicidal despair in the process?Wilson: My answer is always to point the struggling Christian to Christ, whatever the nature of the struggle. Christ is the Savior of all who call upon Him. That said, I would caution against a facile assumption that serious attempts at celibacy by people who were later suicidal are causally connected in any straight line way. Say the suicidal thoughts are downstream from these attempts at celibacy, but also downstream from a life of self-loathing, a distant, angry father, three years of promiscuity, and drug use starting in junior high. If you chalk the suicidal impulses up to the attempts at celibacy only, then it appears that your efforts are more political than they are pastoral.

11. How many married same-sex couples do you know?White: None. Men cannot marry men, women cannot marry women. The verb “marry” has meaning, and the direct object of the verb, when performed by a man, makes him a husband, and the direct object his wife. This is language. All the twisting and Newspeak in the world will never change that, and no Christian with an ounce of respect for God’s Word, who has read Matthew 19:4-6, could ever say otherwise.

12. Do you believe that same-sex couples’ relationships can show the fruit of the Spirit: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control?Wilson: No. The apostle Paul gives us two lists side by side in Galatians. One is the fruit of the Spirit that you mention, and the other one lists the works of the flesh (Gal. 5:19-21). The two lists are inconsistent, and the works of the flesh include unrepented sexual immorality. Life in both lists is incompossible.White: No, since they are sinful relationships forged in rebellion against God’s commands. They are self-focused and detrimental to both parties involved, and as such are fundamentally anti-Christian.

13. Do you believe that it is possible to be a Christian and support same-sex marriage in the church?White: Sure. Christians do silly things every day out of ignorance and tradition. In this case, some Christians, run by their emotions rather than their minds, are running along with the secular crowd. They are dishonoring their Lord, His gospel and His word, and they will surely learn all of that eventually, in this life or the next.

19. Did you know that, for most of church history, Christians believed that the Bible taught the earth stood still at the center of the universe?Wilson: Oh, good grief.

22. Do you know of any Christian writers before the 20th century who acknowledged that gay people must be celibate for life due to the church’s rejection of same-sex relationships?White: I know of no Christian writers before the 20th century who would have allowed Christians to self-identify based upon sexual sin; none that would have therefore used the phrase “gay people” as you do; and the church defines all sexual relationships based upon the positive testimony of Scripture, and there isn’t the first positive word in the Bible about “same-sex relationships,” hence the church’s “rejection” of them is no different than its rejection of incest, bestiality, or necrophilia.

24. Do you believe that the Bible explicitly teaches that all gay Christians must be single and celibate for life?White: The Bible knows nothing of gay Christians, and hence it does not address the issue. All sexual intimacy outside of marriage is proscribed simply because of the intention of sexual intimacy is found in the union of husband and wife, the glorification of God in their loving covenantal commitment, and the resultant production of life—none of which can ever be attributed to any other kind of “union.”

26. Do you believe that the moral distinction between lust and love matters for LGBT people’s romantic relationships?Wilson: No. The sin of homosexual sex is objective. It may be compounded by other sins, like selfishness, or malice, or envy, etc., but even if you take those other sins away, the fact of the homosexual disobedience remains. For a heterosexual analogy, there are some men who are kinder to their prostitutes than other men are to their wives. That doesn’t mean that the prostitution isn’t fornication. It just means the prostitute’s client wasn’t as sinful as he could have been. That doesn’t mean the husband isn’t a jerk, but rather that he is not a fornicator.White: I reject the creation of “community” based upon sexual sin; for each of the letters of the above acronym the sin and rebellion issues are central and definitional. In every instance, however, the Bible’s definition of love must be normative, and I do not see how in any of the L, G, B, or T, that can be possible.

28. Do you believe that Paul’s use of the terms “shameful” and “unnatural” in Romans 1:26-27 means that all same-sex relationships are sinful?White: Would any Second Temple Jew in the days of Paul, who had just drawn from the creation narratives, and is plainly leaning heavily upon the Septuagintal language of the Mosaic law, including Leviticus 18 and 20, have viewed any sexual relationship outside of marriage, and in particular, any homosexual relationship, as anything other? If you say yes, then please, provide us with the sources of these Jewish writers who promoted same-sex relationships as honoring to God’s law.

30. Do you believe that the capacity for procreation is essential to marriage?Wilson: Yes. It is not essential for a marriage to occur or to exist, but openness to children is an essential part of the definition of marriage.

36. Do you know that LGBT youth whose families reject them are 8.4 times more likely to attempt suicide than LGBT youth whose families support them?Wilson: That wouldn’t surprise me. It also wouldn’t surprise me to discover that the family’s rejection of that child began long before any controversy over sexual issues began, and was a player in that child’s vulnerabilities and choices. This goes back to the simplistic approach to counseling that appeared in question #9. This is politics, not pastoring.White: So you claim—and people who become ensnared in all sorts of sinful behavior find it self-destructive, not just homosexuality. So, if we follow your reasoning, we should all be advocating for the acceptance of all sinful behaviors, lest despair brought on by those behaviors result in suicide? Why not realize the problem is with what you are doing, Matthew? You are the one promoting these behaviors, even calling for them to be celebrated. Maybe if our society was not filled with this self-deception, there would be fewer who fall into the temptation and the resultant self-destructive behaviors?

37. Have you vocally objected when church leaders and other Christians have compared same-sex relationships to things like bestiality, incest, and pedophilia?Wilson: No. Why should I object to that? All the reasons you appeal to in support of your questions do not prohibit such comparisons — rather, they invite them. Why do all the yearnings you appeal to, all the innate desires you speak of, the orientations that “are highly resistant to change” that you describe, suddenly become irrelevant simply because the object of desire is an animal, a sister, or underage? Why does the authority of a tough temptation suddenly mean something else?White: No, since it is a logical, rational thing to do, and the only reason you object is that you cannot refute the logic, but instead choose to engage in the emotions game. When you can offer a rational argument against the parallelism, let us all know. Till then, you are clearly seeking to avoid having homosexuality placed in the same category of these sexual sins—the very thing done in Leviticus 18 and 20! Would you have vocally objected to Moses, I wonder?

40. Are you willing to be in fellowship with Christians who disagree with you on this topic?Wilson: No, not if they are teachers. I would be willing to be in fellowship with a Christian who was badly taught on these matters, and needed to have things straightened out for him. But I am not willing to be in fellowship with false teachers who should know better and are deliberately leading people astray.White: How can we? One side is under the Lordship of Christ and the authority of the Word, the other side is attempting to completely overthrow the Gospel and the Christian faith. What fellowship has light with darkness?

Share:

13 Responses to Rebutting the Vines’ Deception

Thanks, Bill. I wasn’t aware of these”40 Questions”, but Vine’s version is so typical of the poisonous deceit circulating in many christian circles today. It grieves me to see so many friends and family members swallowing and regurgitating this dreck. Wilson and White are to be commended for their scriptural response.

Hi Bill was wondering if you are going to write an article on the US supreme courts decision to make same marriage legal in the entire country and how the white house was lit up with coloured lights of the gay rainbow pride flag. Would be interesting to hear your take on it, would also be interested to hear what you think about Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg allowing a gay rainbow pride flag filter that Facebook users can have appear on their profile photos.

Thanks Bill. They are excellent answers. There is much wisdom here. I would add one small point in that the choice is not simply between homosexuality and celibacy as is often touted. The correct and preferred option as I think you have mentioned before and one embraced by many born again Christian, ex-homosexuals, is the complete healing and cleansing from sin, often with entry into properly blessed and sanctioned heterosexual marriages. The whole point of the work of the Holy Spirit is that we no longer need to be bound by and suppressed by our former sin and can receive complete release from that bondage if we give Jesus the opportunity to work in our lives.

One point that is not addressed here is the false claim of the damage done to children by not accepting the homosexual relationship of the “parents” but this, of course, completely shifts the blame off the people responsible for the problems and even though the children in this circumstance are completely vulnerable and powerless to correct the issues and can therefor only see one option, that of all society pretending the problems don’t exist so they can, at least, appear to go away, anyone who looks at the issues such as Dr Sullens, knows that ignoring the problems never actually makes them go away. The evidence is that the longer a child is exposed to homosexual “parenting” the greater the emotional damage so we as a society need to face up to where the problems originate.

Thanks John. Yes true, but as with most of these sorts of debates, we are not trying to reach the 5% of hardcore committed folks on the other side, but the 80-90% of uncommitted and potentially reachable folks in the middle.

I think that all Christians know that there will be those softies who do not want to abide by Gods word and are willing to give some sort of credence to Homosexuals who outside the bedroom or wherever they do it can still appear to be nice people (albeit with a filthy habit). that we specifically do not wish to harm especially in the hope that they can be saved. However this in no way means that we support their claims or their abominable habits.
God is a harsh but righteous Judge their is no such thing as consensus in his laws and no such thing as the acceptance of a homosexual alternative in his creation. Men cannot get pregnant and no law and no earthly judge can change that.
Before the Flood God expressed his views that all men’s thoughts were evil. When he destroyed the towns of Sodom and gomorrah it wasn’t because there were a few sinful men it was because everyone in those cities had gone through the exact same indoctrination of being propagandized into believing the homosexual lie that what they do is normal.
Reading the written word of this event we see that Lot offered his daughters to the men banging on his door (sound familiar). Yet refused them because they wanted to corrupt the Angels within to being just like them. Had they done so then they like Mr Vine would be shouting it from the roof tops that even Gods Angels think its OK, As is similar to misguided Christians today. But it wasn’t and isn’t . And they all subsequently paid the price except the few.righteous that were left. God has no consensus on this matter (with whom one would have to ask) there is no middle ground. God in his infinite wisdom has prepared a place in Heaven for those who obey his words, How can heaven ever be heaven were it to be full of rampant homosexuals trying to convert every one to what is a disease prone and unnatural act. That same selection applies to killers thieves and whoremongers who think they can take their evil ways beyond the grave. The Gulf is fixed.
There is one point in the bible where a man who has died and is talking to Jesus knows that his evil kin will never be let in, And so he asks Jesus to let him go back to make them change their minds so they can be saved. But the man is told that there is a great Gulf fixed between them and heaven that can’t be breached to save those who do not believe on Jesus Christ as their saviour and live their life accordingly. Lets face it we have ample opportunity to live our lives morally and to repent our sins and change for the better, But If we choose not to then on our own heads be it.
Don’t you think that it is uncanny that the words of their being a great gulf between the living sinners and the accepted dead are clearly mentioned.
The bible also says that those men who lay with another man as with a woman will obtain the recompense within them. What is it that you do not understand Mr Vine??

Let us never forget that the devil has been cast down to earth and as the complete antithesis to God everything good must be turned around to be completely opposite to Gods design and word. Each time a moral law is struck down in favour of an acceptance of an opposing evil law against humanity. Know then that, that is one more step toward the return of Jesus. There is more to come before that happens and more to come until the remnant is chosen.
But! as he said many will come in my name be not deceived.

Dead right Dennis Newland – we are told in Revelation that it is going to get so bad that “unless this time be shortened, no flesh could survive”.
But as you say, this all tells us that Jesus is coming back for His remnant. Let us spend our days wisely, so that as many as possible who long for the Truth, may stand there with us on that great day, when every nation, kindred, tongue and tribe will stand around His throne, proclaiming, Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord, who was, and who is, and who reigns.

About CultureWatch

We live in an age where we see evidence of cultural decline, the erosion of values, the decline of civility, the denial of truth and the elevation of unreason. Many people are asking, “Where is our culture heading?” This website is devoted to exploring the major cultural, social and political issues of the day. It offers reflection and commentary drawing upon the wealth of wisdom found in the Judeo-Christian tradition. It offers reflective and incisive commentary on a wide range of issues, helping to sort through the maze of competing opinions, worldviews, ideologies and value systems. It will discuss critically and soberly where our culture is heading. Happy reading!