You are here

2253. Robert Southey to John King, 4 May 1813

You as well as myself have so little leisure for correspondence, that I should not address a letter to you without good
& sufficient cause. – George Fricker you know is here, – & I dare say
you know enough of his inside to suppose that this will be his last home. [1] He is indeed miserably ill, &
has every symptom of pulmonary consumption, except what the expectoration might be expected to furnish: but no matter has yet been
expectorated. Mr Edmondson, who in the healing art is the magnus & only
Apollo [2] within our sphere reach, wishes to know what
your opinion was of the primary liver affection; – your ideas of the case xxxxxxxx, he says, might assist him in forming a
more correct opinion of it. He thinks it a very bad case, tho not yet absolutely hopeless. To me it appears desperate. A little while
since he had the most violent night sweats, but these <have> been entirely subdued by bleeding. Twice there has been a
considerable expectoration of blood since the first hæmorrhage, & from the state of his respiration, & the perpetual sense of
stricture & fulness of which he complains, more of this is to be apprehended. The lungs are now the chief seat of disease, – but if
this disease should be palliated or suspended, the original affection of the liver remains. Give me I pray you a letter, the first part
of which may be for the Doctor upon this subject, – & the rest for myself. – He suspects an adhesion.

My life of Nelson ought about this time to reach you. This book has been a thing of accident rather than of
choice. [3] When
Clarke & McArthurs twenty-pounder xx piece of biography appeard, I was fetched upon to review it, & had no little
inclination for the task, because I felt so little qualified for it, that I should certainly have declined it, if ‘goodly guerdon’ [4] had not been proferred upon such large terms that my poverty consented. I sent off the reviewal thinking
that of all the moneys for which I have ever furnishd printers-devil with bescrawled paper, none was ever worse earned. However it was
liked well by the talking part of the London public & Murray asked me to
enlarge it into a volume which he might sell for a dollar. [5] – That it
appears in two volumes instead of one is more attributable to the printer [6] than to me – for my manuscript exceeded my calculation of its extent not more
than one fifth.

The next book which I shall have to send you will be the conclusion of the Hist. of Brazil: [7]
this will go to press in the course of the summer a few weeks after my hands are rid of the Register. [8] – I take more exercise than I used to do, getting out now whenever
the weather will permit for an hour or hour & half before breakfast, with such of the children as are big old enough to
accompany me. This I have done since Christmas, when a sudden sickness in the midst of dinner without any assignable cause, – brought
on some old feelings xxxxxxxx which I did not like to be reminded of. – Probably I am the better for this regular exercise,
– in my digestion certainly, which was becoming torpid, – I am well at present thank God, – & having learnt at Lisbon to consider
pulmonary disease as in some degree infectious I keep as much as possible out of poor Georges atmosphere; – indeed it is such as warns one to keep at a distance.

In one thing only do I find the effect of years, – that I can no longer read for the mere amusement of the hour &
nor go on adding plan to plan of literary works, but am fain to xxxxxx xxx remember what the hour of the day is, & how
much xx there is to be done before night. On this account I should be glad, if it were practicable, to emancipate myself
from all periodical work: as that however cannot yet be, I take it in good part & go to it with good will. – My poem [9] is about half written & hangs at present in its progress, more for
want of convenient leisure than from any other cause. The difficulties in the management of the story & developement of the
characters are got over, & there are parts in it which I am confident you would prefer to any thing of mine. But of its general MS
torn]tation I xx expect little. Kehama [10] made its way more by its grandiloquence than by any thing
else – & Roderick will be as much below the standard of contemporary taste in point this point, – as it is above it in
every thing else.

I hoped to have been setting out for the South about this time, but it is impossible. The Register is not yet
published, & the Quarterly is calling upon me for xx a paper upon the History of the Dissenters [11] which as yet exists only
in ideas. – Tell Danvers that I did not review Mr Belshams
book. [12] If I had Mr Belsham would gave been treated with all courtesy. Tell him too that if
Mr Somebody who is to bring the Baptist Miss. Number [13] will bring also from Gutchs No 5742 – Mrs Vigors Letters from Russia 6/s [14] – & another book of about
the same price the number of which I have mislaid – but the title as Kindersleys Letters from Teneriffe, Brazil &c [15] – I shall be xx much obliged to him. & will of
course show the bearer all due civilities.

Lord Sunderlins family, whom Mrs
King will x recollect, have been here for some time. – We see them much & like them much.

What a change in the world has the march to Moscow produced! [16] I have no fears for the result as far as the event of the war. For the German spirit is rousd, – the
contest is for life or for death, & with equal armies in the field, an armed & exasperated population must turn the scale. In
what state Europe will find itself after the xxxxxxxx overthrow of this monstrous tyranny offers <is> a
wide field for speculation, – x according to my apprehensions no country has so much to fear & xx so little
to hope as England; – for change is certainly at hand, & change of every kind in our state of polluted morals perverted feelings
& x lamentable ignorance, – or half knowledge which is even more dangerous – must be for the worse.

[3] The Life of Nelson was a development of Southey’s review of John
Charnock (1756–1806; DNB), Biographical Memoirs of Lord Viscount Nelson, &c., &c., &c.; with
Observations, Critical and Explanatory (1806); James Harrison (d. 1847), The Life of Lord Nelson (1806);
T. O. Churchill (fl. 1800–1823), The Life of Lord Viscount Nelson, Duke of Bronté, &c (1808); and James Stanier
Clarke (c. 1765–1834; DNB) and John McArthur (1755–1840; DNB), The Life of Admiral Lord Nelson,
K.B. from his Lordship’s Manuscripts (1809), see Quarterly Review, 3 (February 1810), 218–262. BACK