This collection of essays bring[s] together a range of diverse perspectives on
and scholarly approaches to the Dead Sea Scrolls (p. 1). Each
essay introduces and illustrates a unique approach. The volume positions
itself as both an introductory work for advanced undergraduate and graduate
students and as a compendium of current research by experts in the field: Contributors
have been careful to define their terms and outline their questions in ways
that will be inviting to new readers without being off-putting to those with
more scrolls experience (p. 2). With the needs of students in mind, each
essay defines unfamiliar terminology, provides a clear outline of its
methodology, illustrates that methodology with one or more relevant examples
from the scrolls, and evaluates both the strengths and weaknesses of its given
approach. Experienced researchers will likewise benefit from the volume, as
several essays succeed in producing innovative or unexpected results. Together,
these essays encourage interdisciplinary and self-consciously methodological
discussions, and also invite new conversations across lines of interest,
discipline, and scholarly subfield (p. 4).

Following an introduction by Grossman, Metso's essay encourages reconsideration of old
assumptions in scrolls research. The remaining essays are grouped loosely into
four categories. The first group examines the evidence of the manuscripts
themselves (Tigchelaar, Abegg, and Zuckerman). The second explores
archaeological and historical issues surrounding the Qumran community and the
scrolls (Magness, Lapin, and Davila). The third focuses on scribal culture
and text-critical issues (Ulrich, Hempel, and Delamarter). A final group
approaches the scrolls from rhetorical, sociological, and religious
perspectives (Newsom, Kugler, Grossman, Jokiranta, and Klawans).

Constructing, Deconstructing and Reconstructing Fragmentary Manuscripts: Illustrated by a
Study of 4Q184 (4QWiles of the Wicked Woman) by Eibert Tigchelaar is one of
the more pedagogically attuned and engaging essays for students and scholars
alike. At the outset, he cautions that one can benefit fully from reading
this chapter only if one also examines the publicly available images of the
fragments (p. 26). Throughout the remainder of the essay, Tigchelaar assumes
that his readers are actually looking at the PAM photographs of 4Q184. While more demanding for the reader, this choice
produces an interesting and interactive experience as the reader identifies,
along with Tigchelaar, various features of the fragments, and is able to
engage, first hand, in the process of critically assessing the
constructions and reconstructions of manuscripts by editors (p. 28).
The essay explains how to access images of the fragments using the best
available tools (pp. 2829), delineates the criteria used by editors of the
scrolls to construct and reconstruct a manuscript (p. 30), and points out
various red flags that may help to identify questionable reconstructions (p.
31). The chosen example, 4Q184, nicely illustrates how to spot red
flags as well as how several of the criteria can be used to propose a more
precise reconstruction. In the end, Tigchelaar's argument is compelling and
suggests that this most fundamental form of scrolls research remains
a viable and worthwhile line of inquiry.

Counterfactual History and the Dead Sea Scrolls by James R. Davila is one of the more
surprising and refreshing contributions. Unlike the majority of the essays
which aim to demonstrate how a particular methodology,
whether traditional or experimental, might aid
our understanding of the scrolls (p. 215), Davila demonstrates how
the scrolls might aid our understanding of other ancient texts, and
perhaps even our understanding of the processes and presuppositions of modern
historiography itself. His creative approach sets out to write a history of
what might have happened but did not (p. 129). He carefully imagines an
alternate history (p. 142) in which the text of the Hodayot was
translated into Greek, then into Syriac, then lost entirely, except in a single
Syriac manuscript. What might modern scholarly techniques tell us about the
provenance and character of such a text? Davila devises and follows a strict
set of methodological guidelines in order to keep his alternate history as
plausible as possible (p. 130). He then shows that if such a scenario were
real, scholars might well conclude that the Hodayot were originally
called the Odes of Isaiah, and composed in Syriac during the 2nd4th
centuries by the proto-monastic Christian group called the ܒܢܝ ܩܝܡܐ(sons of
the covenant). All of this intends to show that our traditional approaches to
historiography are not nearly as certain as we would like to believe they are.

Of Calendars, Community Rules, and Common Knowledge: Understanding 4QSe-4QOtot,
with Help from Ritual Studies by Robert Kugler is one of the more
conversational and reflective chapters. He begins with a confession, (p. 220)
which affords the reader a unique insight into the collaborative process
through which this book was produced, as well as the unexpected ways in which
his own research evolved. Students who desire to engage in these procedures
themselves (p. 28) will find this brief discussion beneficial. The essay draws
from a recent rational-functional approach to ritual studies and attempts to
explain certain peculiar features of 4QOtot. The primary thrust of the essay,
however, may be found in its epilogue. Here, Kugler suggests three ways we
might position ourselves relative to the resources other disciplines offer (p.
215). He urges the reader to allow the nature of the evidence (p. 227) in order to
determine which methods are employed, to be aware of variant approaches within
unfamiliar disciplines (p. 227), and to remain open to the use of multiple
disciplines in combination with one another (p. 228). Although two essays
remain, these remarks effectively function as a conclusion to the book as a
whole.

Overall, this volume is a fascinating look at recent research on the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Its primary strength is its explicitly methodological focus. Each approach is
presented with exceptional clarity and the deliberate use of concrete examples
brings each method to life. Also significant is its implicit call for greater
diversity in the study of the scrolls and for further collaboration among
practitioners of distinct approaches. The volume excels in both areas. It would
perhaps have benefitted from some added means of dialogue among the authors
beyond the simple juxtaposition of contrasting essays. Overall, the reader is left with
the general impression of a fairly united attempt to understand the scrolls.
While major disagreements are not intentionally downplayed, neither are they
probed to any significant degree. Likewise, the reader is left to decide for
him or herself how these approaches might best be put to use in conjunction
with one another. Nevertheless, this volume will undoubtedly prove beneficial
for students and scholars looking for greater exposure to current issues and
debates in the field, for those who want to reexamine and reevaluate the
methodological basis of their own research, and for those interested in
discovering exciting new ways to approach the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls.