Category: Revelation 12

So The Temple Institute has made a few claims that the red heifer needs to only be 2 years old since the birth of one on August 28th, 2018. I know for a fact that Judaism teaches that the red heifer cannot be sacrificed until it is 3 years old. Not only that, The Temple Institute has said on there website that the red heifer does have to be at least 3 years old or older. That is a main requirement for the heifer. Hit the picture and go to their website.

By being 3 years old, it brings it to maturity, but what they fail to see is that the red heifer was a type and shadow of Jesus and the crucifixion. Jesus’ ministry lasted over 3 years and most scholars (including myself) believe this is why the red heifer needs to be atleast 3 years old. Even Maimonides (Rambam), their fearless leader, says it’s to be atleast 3 years old. The age of the heifer is crucial and their is good reason for them to now change it.

The “2 years old” theory came out after the August birth and for some reason Rabbi Ariel keeps claiming this is the age it needs to be in order to sacrifice and burn it. I couldn’t for the life of me figure out why they changed it so suddenly. Then I had gotten a comment from a reader. “I watched a speaker recently saying the age of the heifer was based on time of conception, not birth, for the sacrificial age. He was told this by the temple Institute in Israel. Did you find anything like this in your research? Curious.” (Lori Ledbetter)

So someone is claiming that the age of the red heifer is based on the time of conception. Well…that is very interesting if that’s the theory they are sticking too and if that is actually the reason as to why they say that “2” years old is good. Technically, starting at conception does make it just over 3 years old in December. Let me tell you why this is so interesting. In my book “The Temple, The Abomination and The Holy place”, I make the claim that the final 10th red heifer will be the abomination Jesus talks about in Matthew 24. I lay a lot of ground work to get there so if your interested, search on this blog and you can get the pdf for free. A hard copy is on Amazon.

Now if this future red heifer is in fact the abomination that Jesus talks about then the date of it being sacrificed and burnt on the Mount of Olives is very important. Im my book I mention December 21-23, 2020 in my book. This is when a rare celestial event happens called the HaDibbuk HaGadol or in English, The Great Conjunction. This conjunction happens when Saturn-Jupiter meet up during the Winter Solstice. I go in depth about this in my book “Their god is Jupiter” and it is connected to the false birth of Jupiter. Now if you remember, this red heifer birth happened on August 28th, 2018. I went back and looked at their beginning date for the time of conception and as soon as I saw it I knew that date was significant. I had talked about it a few years ago.

I looked it up on a gestation calender for angus and the conception date came to November 19th, 2017. Now what’s the big deal about November 19th, 2017 you may ask? On the 18th, one day before, Saturn left Ophiuchus after being there almost 2 years. It was actually 96 days short of 2 years. Now the importance of this is crucial in my opinion. Please read this whole thing I wrote a few years ago to understand why Saturn being in Ophiuchus was important. I will give a brief primer.

Ophiuchus is represented as the serpent bearer or the restrainer. In my opinion, I believe there may be a connection to what Paul told the Thessalonians about the restrainer with what happened in 2017. And remember, this happened just a few months of the false sign of Revelation 12 on September 23rd, 2017. Everything is connected. Now in February of 2017, Saturn left Ophiuchus for 84 days.

Saturn left Ophiuchus on February 23rd and I want to point out that NASA released the information on Trappist-1 and its seven planets on February 22nd, the day before.Trappist-1 was a big announcement from NASA that three was this new system and it was located in Aquarius, the water bearer. These Satanists use code, symbolism and dates to achieve their invocation and indoctrination. This is nothing more than witchcraft in my opinion.

So we can see that Saturn leaving in February was planned wth NASA announcing a new system that seemed to have 7 planets. Some equate Trappist-1 wth a sort of seven trumpets connection. Could be I guess if you look at all of this symbolically. So what is interesting is when Saturn left Ophiuchus for good. It was on November 18th. The day before the red heifer was birthed. Honestly, I can’t make this up and if I didn’t write about the significance of Satan being unrestrained in accordance with Thessalonians, I wouldn’t believe it. Like I said, you have to read my book to understand what is happening here.

If I believe the unbinding of Satans restraints releases that Antichrist spirit and it happened on November 18th, 2017, then this same spirit was behind the birth if this red heifer on the very next day. What are the odds of Saturn who is represented as Satan, leaving Ophiuchus the Restrainer the day before the Temple Institutes red heifer was born? Please, tell me the odds. Or was it planned all along? This fits 100% into my theory that the red heifer is the abomination of Matthew 24 and the spirit behind it is the spirit of Antichrist.

I want to point out one other thing. I don’t get into Gematria much but Jaycoolbreeze brought up a great point. In English Gematria, the red heifer is 666. Interesting right? I also want to show you one last thing. Look at the image below.

Why is Taurus the red bull standing on the tail of the serpent in Ophiuchus in this old image? Taurus is in the other part of the sky, nowhere near Ophiuchus.

Well it’s not actually Taurus. It is Taurus Poniatovaii. This constellation came about in 1777 (trust me folks, 777 is not a good number in the sense that there is a “good number”) and it was invented by Martin Poczobut to honor Stanisław August Poniatowski (notice his middle name? August) who was the last Polish Monarch.

The King was known for the destruction of Poland who had a Jewish mistress. “Poczobut did not realize it but his short-lived creation contained the faint red dwarf known as Barnard’s Star, which we now know to be the second-closest star to the Sun, 5.9 light years away. It lay in the bull’s head, near the present-day 66 Ophiuchi. Sadly, Poniatowski’s bull did not last long in the sky before being put out to pasture and its stars are now part of Ophiuchus and Serpens Cauda.” (http://www.ianridpath.com/startales/poniatowski.htm)

Taurus Poniatovaii or Poniatowski’s Bull was formed from another constellation that fell to the wayside. The River Tigris. Does that sound familiar? The Tigris (Hiddekel-sharp, swift, rapid) was the third of four rivers that went through the Garden of Eden. Daniel calls it the “great river” in Daniel 10:4.

So I find it strange at one time there was a red bull on the tail of the serpent in Ophiuchus.

Below is the screenshot of November 19th, 2017 ala The Conception of the Red Heifer. The day after Saturn left Ophiuchus.

The Birth of Red Heifer. August 28th, 2018. Saturn at the bow of the mighty hunter Sagittarius and Jupiter their false god is at the tip of the scales of judgement.

Can anyone see what I’m seeing with all of this?

Berkowitz who writes for Breaking Israel News states in this video that the heifer could be ready in a year and a half from March 13th, 2019. This would put us at a September 2020 date around the time of the Jewish year. It still fits with my theory.

The main argument from the 9/23 Rapture Cult is that this sign from Revelation 12:1 is the rapture. Some have even back pedeled away from it and make the claim that if the rapture doesn’t happen on September 21-23 then it will happen by the first of October or by December 1st. Some have even said that it could be the start of their “7 year tribulation”. I disagree with all those theories. I’ll say it a million times, its not a good sign and its an occult event only to decieve Christians.

They look at all kinds of disinformation and will continue to disregard the actual Greek text and wording of scripture. One particular person who has commented on my original post continued to say prophetic literature was written in different tenses and moods in the Greek but refuses to explain what he means and answer my main point. That being…Why would John use one specific form of a word that was in the Passive (Past Tense as he saw it when writing it) form and use the same word in a different form in the following chapter as Active (something Future and continuing at the time he wrote it)? Let’s look at the Greek of these verses.

Below is from the Recieved Text or Textus Receptus of 1550. This stream of Greek is where we get the KJV. In contrast to this text is the Tischendorf 8th Edition where he translated from the Sinaiticus. Tish found this text in the trash at a Greek Monastery. Wescott and Hort and Nestle and Aland used this text along with many others to get modern translations like the NIV and many others.

In order for one to believe that the Revelation 12:1 & 3 signs are for a future event, one would need to stick to Tischendorfs Sinaiticus manuscript which falls right in line with the Vatican made “rapture” theory. Below we see verses Revelation 12:1 & 3 in regards to what John SAW or should I say was seen ie passive ie past tense. Underneath these verses is Tischendorfs falsified documents.

As you can see, John used ὤφθη ((ōphthē – was seen) as a Aorist Indicative Passive in the 3rd person in the Textus Receptus manuscripts. Matter of fact, almost every Greek text used this same word except for Tischendorfs 8th Edition from the Sinaiticus. He used ὁράω which is in the Indicative Active and is actually the root word horaó. The way he wrote it was in the Future tense and the Vatican Jesuits loved it. In all of the other manuscripts, including W&H’s blasphemous texts, it was passive. This is where these texts got it right for once.

Now if John wanted to use this word for something seen in a future or active tense for the Greek, he would’ve wrote the word in a active future tense or a future tense. The active future tense of this word for “seen or saw” looks like this, εἶδον (eidon). Ironically John did use the future active tense of this word in Revelation, and he used it 45 times. The active future form of this word εἶδον was used 45 times compared to ὤφθη, the passive or past tense form used only 3 times. Now I need to correct something on my last paper on this. According to the W&H, Nestle and other texts, this word εἶδον (eidon) is used in Revelation 13:1. Tischendorf still uses ὁράω. The problem with this is that these mentioned manuscripts completely leave out the opening sentence in 13:1.

Revelation 13:1

And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy (KJV)

So these other manuscripts leave out a sentence all together and the word for saw, εἶδον (eidon) is used in the active future form. Something that would be present in John’s day that would continue into the future. That should put to sleep a future 1st and 2nd beast theory…but it won’t according to some.

The actual true Future tense of the word for this same word for “seen or saw” was used by John a few times in Revelation. You can see it in Revelation 1:7 the Future Indicative Middle tense of ὄψεται (opsetai). Its also in Revelation 22:4 with ὄψονται (opsontai). These two words are used for Jesus’ second coming for a future time. The Greek wasn’t foriegn to John when he wrote this word for something he saw in a dream or vision whether it be for a future time or something in the past. It was either past tense with something that happened prior to him seeing what he saw or it was something active while he was writing Revelation and continuing or for the a future event at the time of him writing Revelation.

All of these words come from the root word horaó. John clearly knew how to differentiate between something that happened in the past, something that was actively happening and would to continue to happen in the future and something that was strictly for a future time. According to the Greek text, Revelation 12:1,3 was based off of something that had happened in the past. If John wanted to say that the Revelation 12 signs were for a future event then he would have used either ὄψεται of Revelation 1:7 or ὄψονται in Revelation 22:4. He didn’t. That’s why Revelation 12:1 is the birth of Jesus and not some “rapture” of the Church. To believe its for a future time and the “rapture” of the church then you need to follow the corrupted Sinaiticus and the Vatican. Which they do.