October 24, 2002

2,400 Grads Vote On Unionization

Approximately 2,400 graduate students went to the polls yesterday at the Straight, Mann Library and the Geneva Experiment Station to vote on whether they should unionize.

If the majority of the students vote in favor of the Cornell Association of Student Employees / United Auto Workers (CASE/UAW), they will create the second graduate student union in the nation at a private university.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), moderators of the vote, opened its doors at 10 a.m. as steady streams of students came throughout the day. During the nine-hour voting period, groups of both CASE/UAW and anti-union members stood near voting areas at different times, wearing pins to emphasize their cause. Although not purposely attempting to sway voters’ decisions, their presence was felt around campus.

“I think its going to be very close and it will be decided by challenge votes,” Rothenbuehler said. “If I had to bet, I would go with a no [union vote].”

Sebastian said that he does not think that unionization will be passed because many science students, “are not interested in eligibility.”

After the voting period ends at 7 p.m. today, the NLRB will go straight to work in tabulating the ballots.

Students who vote but were not initially eligible, submit challenge votes. A challenge vote is sealed and is only used if the decision difference is too small. If this occurs, the NLRB will re-evaluate the eligibility of each student who submitted a challenge vote and will open their vote if that student’s vote is valid.

The NLRB did not comment on the number of students who have voted or the time when they will announce the results.

Voting will continue today at the Straight’s International Lounge and Mann Library lobby from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m.

The CASE/UAW becomes the sole bargaining agent for all terms and conditions of employment if the pro-union votes gain a majority. The union hopes to improve stipends, health care and grievance procedures if the vote goes their way.

Anti-unionization members’ main concerns include UAW politics and union dues.

Although Meiser is “hopeful,” she claims it will be a “travesty if the union doesn’t go through.”

If the motion passes, it will create the second graduate student union for a private university.

Earlier this year, the UAW started a campaign to unionize graduate students after they won a case at New York University.

WIth another day of voting today, all sides are encouraging eligible students to vote. Meiser said that “everybody should put in their own opinion.”

“We hope as many students as possible go to the polls,” Henrik N. Dullea ’61, vice president for University relations said. “That is what the University would like to see.”

This is the "wpengine" admin user that our staff uses to gain access to your admin area to provide support and troubleshooting. It can only be accessed by a button in our secure log that auto generates a password and dumps that password after the staff member has logged in. We have taken extreme measures to ensure that our own user is not going to be misused to harm any of our clients sites.

Related

The two weeks after fall break are traditionally the big rush for Collegetown housing and this year proved to be no different. In spite of recent concerns over off-campus housing resulting from a condemned house last month, steady student interest has caused some in the property business to wonder whether students care more about their safety or their location. Sharon Marx, property manager of Ithaca Renting — owners of Collegetown Plaza, Center, and Court — said that around 50 people camped out earlier this week to make sure they could get one of the higher occupancy units. Ithaca Renting actually opens up later than most landlords to rent out space for the following academic year, and students should be looking by now, according to Marx. If students wait, she said, “they’ll not get prime choices in apartments.” Marx has noticed that this year fewer students seemed to be prepared. “We’re finding the groups this year are just not organized … they’re not getting groups together and making a decision.” However, the reason students seem to be holding off may be because of recommendations from Cornell’s Housing Office. Pam Zinder ’82, manager of Housing Alternatives, said that their office will not even post listings for the following year until November. “I can’t guarantee that things will still be available, but when students are finding housing now for next year, they have to ask themselves important questions,” Zinder said. She said students need to think about things like whether they will remain friends with their future roommates or if they end up wanting to go abroad. “Once [students] sign the lease, it’s a binding agreement, and [they] can’t break it. If their situation changes, they’re going to have to make some difficult decisions.” Christopher Anagnost ’65 of Christopher George Real Estate said, “I think people are more interested in signing a lease, and hoping it complies.” Students seem to be unaware of both the importance of a certificate of compliance as well as the resources available to them, according to Zinder. “They feel like they’re very alone, but that’s not correct … [the Housing Office] is here to help them,” she said. The Housing Office helps with their online listings and suggestions, in addition to in-person assistance. Representatives will review leases with students to make sure they understand everything. For this weekend’s First-Year Family Weekend, the Housing Office will have a session to inform parents about their student’s housing options for next year. In another attempt to inform students, the Student Assembly (S.A.) passed a resolution last night to send out a “Collegetown Bill of Rights” to all students via e-mail. Jackie Koppell ’05, chair of Residential and Community Life Committee for S.A., said that the purpose of the bill is to educate students of their rights as tenants and the legal responsibilities of landlords. Phyllis Radke, Building Commission for the City of Ithaca, thinks it will be helpful for students. “The knowledge you have … will be a great tool,” she said. She also thought that if students used the Collegetown Bill of Rights, her office would probably have fewer parents calling them in the fall, concerned about their children’s living conditions. Anagnost said that the bill could “probably have a small impact, but not on the scale [Student Assembly ] would like to see.” Even with better resources available, students still must take the action and use them. The City of Ithaca is trying to help and make sure all housing properties are up to code. Radke said that they have already hired another building inspector, and plans are under way to reformat the procedure the City has for doing inspections. This new strategy would include closer attention towards landlords that have failed to stay current with the Building Code in the past. Matoula Halkiopoulos, owns several properties in Collegetown and she said that they are all kept up to code. “I have a good name, so I don’t have a problem,” said Halkiopoulos.Archived article by Rachel Brenner

Declaring that successful democratic reform in Africa must be managed by Africans, Justice Johann Kriegler delivered the keynote address last night for this weekend’s symposium on reform and poverty alleviation in Africa. Kriegler, who serves on the Constitutional Court of South Africa, spoke to an audience of 150 in the Biotechnology Building yesterday about the perils and prospects of African development. Kriegler’s lecture kicked off a weekend of debate and discussion, involving scholars, lawyers, economists and political scientists from around the world. Kriegler’s talk emphasized new approaches to an old, increasingly severe problem. “Any reference to developing countries in Africa is a misnomer, if not a lie,” he said, setting the tone for an evening of critical re-examination of past and present development initiatives. The conference, entitled “Democratic Reform in Africa: Impact on Governance and Poverty Alleviation,” runs through Saturday. It is sponsored by the Institute for African Development, the Poverty, Inequality and Development Initiative and the Center for Democratic Performance, in conjunction with the Einaudi Center for International Studies, the Cornell Institute for Public Affairs and the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology. Best known for chairing South Africans electoral commission in 1994 during the country’s first racially inclusive elections, Kriegler serves on South Africa’s highest court. Championing the work of economists Joseph Stiglitz and Amartya Sen, Kriegler prescribed a new formula for African development based on the facilitation of participatory democracy and the development of political and legal norms in African nations. Kriegler recognized the establishment of functioning democracy as an engine for economic renewal. “Civil rights are crucial in guaranteeing equal economic rights, which are vital to establishing broad based economic democracy,” he said, acknowledging the work of Sen, winner of the 1998 Nobel Prize in economics. In presenting his vision for African restoration, Kriegler advocated a bottom-up approach built around small businesses, a marked departure from the top-down, external initiatives of prior decades. Kriegler faulted organizations such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations for “toiling mightily” and “spending billions of dollars” in Africa to little or no effect. Much of the wealth that has been devoted to African development has been squandered in the hands of corrupt African regimes, unequipped to handle the great responsibility of allocating the money, according to Kriegler. “Great harm is done by sticking cash in the deep pockets of government agencies lacking the capacity to absorb and dispense such funds,” he said. “The beneficence becomes a curse.” As an alternative, Kriegler supported investment in small businesses, grassroots initiatives and traditional African authorities in order to reintegrate the people of Africa into the process of reform. “The days of Africans wagging their tails for their master’s approval have passed,” he said. “Gifts from across the water will always be regarded with suspicion.” Recognizing African scholars who advocate a form of “black consciousness” and the rejection of democratic reform altogether, Kriegler urged the United States and Europe to pursue a more “subtle” and “indirect” course in affecting change on the continent. Kriegler did however validate the inherent African mistrust of foreign intervention identifying “the AK-47 and the landmine” as the two most profound legacies of Africa’s involvement with the developed world. “With more reason than Americans have, Africans are suspicious of foreigners with strange accents and different pigmentation,” he said. “Kriegler addressed the issues in a frank and decisive manner,” said Francis Kim ’03. Judith February, a lawyer for the Institute of Democracy in South Africa, praised Kriegler, but said his speech broke no new ground. “In South Africa, we are talking about these issues all the time,” she said. “Kriegler’s speech was good, but it was nothing unexpected,” February said. Presentations on democratic reform in Africa are to be held in Clark Hall and will run through Saturday.Archived article by Jason Leff