Welcome

Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and
others concerned about HIV/AIDS. Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the
conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning: Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive
and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a
username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own
physician.

All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators
of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please
provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are
true and correct to their knowledge.

Author
Topic: preventive medicine ???? (Read 2309 times)

What do you all think about some governments giving meds to people who are NEG in order to prevent the virus from occuring? I am appalled at the thought, because I am afraid of it mutating and I don't think it is a good idea to put healthy people on meds like ours. I just think its the wrong direction and bad for mankind and all of us who are POZ. It may make it harder to treat those who really do need the meds when they become infected.

"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

I thought the latest news was the trials in the US have been stopped because it wasn't effective enough.

Could people make an effort to note the difference between PEP and PrEP.

So the OP Atripla User is asking about PrEP.

I don't know about the resistance threats the OP is concerned about. It seems the trials wouldn't have happened if this was a known risk.

I could imagine scenarios in which PrEP makes sense.

OP - I don't know any governments who are "giving" PrEP, do you?

If I were a public health worker in a locale where sex workers aren't allowed to have safe sex, it might make sense to argue for a NGO or government to try distributing PrEP for free. Just one example.

Or as above, couples in serodiscordant relationships opting for it.

Also I thought it was progressive enough, on one hand, to think about gay guys at risk because of some self-chosen lifestyle. Its long been reported here in this forum that Truvada was used on the "circuit" scene - if that prevented some transmissions, where is the harm to anyone?? On the other hand, if PrEP is only partially effective it might backfire giving people a feeling of security to do whatever they want.

I think HIV educators have challenges already with the "one pill a day - HIV is no big deal" belief.

I dunno finally.

« Last Edit: July 15, 2011, 04:12:43 PM by mecch »

Logged

“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need” 1875 K Marx

considering the costs (over $1k a month), daily adherence issues*, and side effects, all with only 63% to 74% effectiveness, I think it more realistic to advocate that condoms are always the best way to go.

*recently while discussing these studies with friends, we questioned the reality of there being that many people who were going to bareback with people with unknown statuses enough times in a month to make it "effective" to take an antiretroviral daily to ward off getting infected. I mean, who gets laid that much?!? LOL Of course sero-discordant couples might and for them this might be a consideration; but i would posit that most single people don't engage in enough sex per month to make taking a pill daily a very feasible alternative. Condoms seem so much more effective, practical, and cost efficient for the limited times a month most people would reasonably have sex.

Some people are good at negotiating sex and protection up front. Some aren't.

Other people are good about taking pills to protect themselves. Look at how popular supplements are.

It is important to have multiple strategies -- all these people who say that condoms are effective seem to be ignoring the fact that ... well, that strategy isn't working as a standalone and jawboning has not made it work in the past. We need multiple strategies for complex issues.

though the truvada strategy seems very expensive for this war - especially when over-shadowed of poor countries and poor (American) counties where treatment is in short supply - you make a very good point about needing many weapons in the arsenal.

What I am wondering is if this will make ARVs more "common", if it starts to get manufactured as preventive drugs. Would this, in a way, force pharmaceutical companies to lower their prices? Imagine, if they get to a point where ARVs of new generation can be used the same ways birth-control pills are? Tho I don't like the analogy, as both kind of pills are not linked to the same realities/consequences.