Here is James Clarkson's letter upon leaving, not directly because of lack of evidence but because of lack of integrity - it has become a money-making organization at the cost of its investigative integrity:

An account of Rich Hoffman. leaving because of " the blatantly unscientific nature of this year's Symposium, and his concern that MUFON keeps moving farther away from genuine scientific investigations"

How does one abduct a UFO? The main issue would be that when you get close to it identification should be easy, even if the summary is "flying saucer" or "alien spaceship". It's no longer unidentified at that point, thus we have a tautology. (If I used that word right.)

How does one abduct a UFO? The main issue would be that when you get close to it identification should be easy, even if the summary is "flying saucer" or "alien spaceship". It's no longer unidentified at that point, thus we have a tautology. (If I used that word right.)

How does one abduct a UFO? The main issue would be that when you get close to it identification should be easy, even if the summary is "flying saucer" or "alien spaceship". It's no longer unidentified at that point, thus we have a tautology. (If I used that word right.)