- Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, Peter Dale Scott, 1993, University of California Press.

On pourra aussi s'intéresser aux travaux publiés de la commission parlementaire "Select Committee on Assassinations" de 1979 qui concluent notamment:
"The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Cuban Government was not involved in the assassination of Kennedy."

"In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us that no sign of it appears on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousand fold in the future. When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers, we are not simply protecting their trivial old age, we are thereby ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations."

2013/11/19

All Internet infrastructures, OS and devices are not only unsecured or targetable. Because security shortcomings have been voluntarily and wildly dispersed, the whole digital environment is now deeply polluted by efficient but still unpublished back-doors and weaknesses.

The control of this global infrastructure, and of its private content, is potentially the winning price offered by a rogue state to any organisations able to find each hack. A new hidden race is ongoing.

"In its haste to "weaponize" the Internet, the NSA has broken its mechanisms of security. And those breaks—including the backdoors that the NSA convinced or coerced software developers to put into the implementations of their encryption and other security products, are so severe that it is now just a matter of time before others with less-noble causes than fighting terrorism will be able to exploit the holes the NSA has created.

Schneier said that the vulnerabilities inserted into security products by the NSA through its BULLRUN program could easily be exploited by criminals and other nation-states as well once they are discovered. And the other attacks and surveillance methods used by the NSA " will be tomorrow's doctoral theses and next week's Science Fair projects."

But with Congress focused on the woes of the Affordable Care Act, it's not clear if anyone other than those already friendly to Schneier's message was listening." (1)

I am listening.

Any state able to catch this should officially ask the US government to force the NSA to collaborate back with IETF and vendors as soon as possible in order to patch, to publish and to document each and every backdoor or weakness added into implementations of algorithms (software and hardware based).
Any person able to catch this should ask himself why the US government is unable to force the NSA to do this.

This would be only the easiest part of the recovery trail. Think about Fukushima: in both cases we only know at this moment the beginning of the story. Environmental contaminations are very complex and they take considerable time to clean up.

Because Internet belongs to all of us the citizens, and does not belong to any organisation, it is very worrying that the US Government has allowed to seriously damage a common good (the first ever artificial common good, by the way): the infrastructure of our digital environment. This government first, but not only one, must then make every effort to repair it right now, as much as it can. If it fails in this task, it would be a failed state.

This is a major topic for Ars Industrialis... and for any people involved in the mastered value of Internet and digital environments for citizens.

2013/11/17

"When the U.S. gained independence, it sought to join the international community of the day. That is why the Declaration of Independence opens by expressing concern for the "decent respect to the opinions of mankind."

A crucial element was evolution from a disorderly confederacy to a unified "treaty-worthy nation," in diplomatic historian Eliga H. Gould's phrase, that observed the conventions of the European order. By achieving this status, the new nation also gained the right to act as it wished internally.

It could thus proceed to rid itself of the indigenous population and to expand slavery, an institution so "odious" that it could not be tolerated in England, as the distinguished jurist William Murray, Earl of Mansfield, ruled in 1772. Evolving English law was a factor impelling the slave-owning society to escape its reach.

Becoming a treaty-worthy nation thus conferred multiple advantages: foreign recognition, and the freedom to act at home without interference. Hegemonic power offers the opportunity to become a rogue state, freely defying international law and norms, while facing increased resistance abroad and contributing to its own decline through self-inflicted wounds."

I would like then to add :

Becoming a rogue state, a treaty-unworthy nation thus conferred multiple disadvantages: blunt foreign recognition, erosion of influence and soft power, diplomacy side-lined in the rapidly evolving international system, and at the extreme point: the freedom for a failed state to act at home without interference is challenged. Hegemonic power seems to offer the opportunity to freely defy international law and norms. In fact, a rogue state is always recognized for what it is, and is facing ever increasing resistance both at home and abroad.
I wrote about this conception in The inevitable counter-revolution of the American people.

[Thanks to Ipernity.com for the article about W.T. Stead's book (The Americanization of the world; or, The trend of the twentieth century) published in 1902 and freely available.]

Foreword:

The crisis of legitimacy faced by the institutions of the global governance system set up after 1945 is resulting in the collapse of the old framework of international cooperation, with apparently nothing ready to replace it, besides a myriad of more or less successful regional integration projects. The supra-national regional entities that are currently being forged, created in a context of increasing emergency, are indeed the building blocks of tomorrow’s multipolar world. These integration processes are certainly a necessary step, but without a new "global" governance framework, capable of harmoniously combining these new components, conflicts of interest will soon oppose them and will quickly lead the world into the logic that prevailed in Europe in the late nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth century.

Today everyone can see these tensions mounting between blocks on the themes of access to commodities, trade, currencies,.. putting high pressure on the fragile world peace and endangering the impressive development of emerging powers and the long period of prosperity of Western powers.

The next G20 to be held in Saint Petersburg in September is the next opportunity that the world gives itself to find solutions to the growing difficulties facing its equilibrium. But time is running out...

The Euro-BRICS strategic alliance :

For three years now and based on three seminars already, LEAP and MGIMO have been advocating a Euro-BRICS strategic alliance wishes to enable:

Europe to turn more resolutely towards the future dynamics that the BRICS bring

the BRICS to find the allies they need to achieve a more balanced global governance system.

In this double simultaneous development, the whole world has everything to gain.

My presentation was titled "Towards a resilient international monetary system to systemic crises". I presented a strategic overview of the first part of my thoughts on the evolution of the international monetary system, which concerns the short-term. When reading its content (full text below) it may yet seem too much avant-garde or even wacky. This is not the case as demonstrated by recent announcements: first the announcement last July of the use of Qianhai special region for the purpose of innovation in financial flows. And second: in June 2013, the Asian Development Bank, the Centre for International Governance Innovation and the Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research published a study entitled "A Practical Approach To International Monetary System Reform: Building Infrastructure For Settlement Regional Currencies" (originally presented in a conference December 2012 in Hong-Kong) and exactly aligned with the strategy that I have described.

Bruno Paul, 08/27/2013.

Towards a resilient
international monetary system to systemic crises

Back in April 2010, the World Bank member countries agreed to change its severely criticized governance. This text has never been ratified by the U.S. Congress.

In response to the question I asked last 04/19/2013 at the conference #futureecon organized by the IMF, about the possibility of creating a second IMF by the BRICS countries, the IMF Deputy General Manager M. Min Zhu worried about this eventuality, and the question is no longer taboo. We need to remember that the world has witnessed the use of two simultaneously dominant reserve currencies during the interwar period. The U.S. dollar and British pound were used in almost equal parts, each with their own geographic area of influence.[5] To continue only to forecast a single international monetary system and a single reserve currency is therefore probably a reflex or an intellectual habit.

IMF has announced a commitment to a review of quotas by January 2014, a proposition championed by BRIC countries since 2008. [1]

From the conclusions of their last April and May meetings, G20-Finance, the World Bank, the IMF and the IFMC helped to highlight the strong convergence of international debate and a consensus on three key principles: structural reforms that will manage debt on a sustainable path, deficit reduction over the medium term and reduction of global macroeconomic imbalances. It is explicitly stated the need to restore the resilience of the international economic system.

The IFMC press release specifically indicates a commitment to refrain from competitive devaluations.[6]

We can then define two groups of countries: those who actually enroll in this consensus, and those for whom it is only words since the beginning of the crisis. Factual analysis of the evolution of macroeconomic indicators since 2008 allows us to isolate in one group: the U.S., Japan, and the United Kingdom, and in another group: all others G20 countries. For instance, efforts towards a fiscal convergence within the eurozone are particularly remarkable. The integrated economic government of Euroland, with a president appointed at its head who would be responsible for a tax harmonization among the member countries and to extend the plan against tax evasion is growing each day a little bit more, these days by the official voice of François Hollande who so wishes to occur before 2015.

On the other group, without having to officially using the terms of "competitive devaluation" the weapon of extraordinary monetary policies has already allowed the yen to lose continuously 25% of its value against the dollar, the euro, and the yuan since October 2012. Analysts announce the continuation of this trend throughout 2013.

Therefore
what struck us is the failure of the IMF strategic mission of financial
supervision, whose official statements endorse the practices of countries that
do not play the multilateral game.

This
has already pushed the BRICS countries to develop a common strategy for the reform
of the international monetary system. [4]To my mind it is shared by the political
leaders in the Euroland and fully in the logic of closer Euro-BRICS relations.Let’s list the the big milestones of
this multilateral strategy for the reform:

Reform and entry into force of new quotas and voting rights in the IMF, with an
improving weight for countries like the BRICS;

Reform of the basket of currencies defining the SDR currency (with gold gram);

Development
of a very deep and liquid market for international trade based on the new SDR

Slow
rebalancing of global macroeconomic imbalances in the medium term, is to say 20
years minimum

The
unprecedented political movement created by the creation of a new BRICS development
bank, far from appearing as a simple duplication, can be also useful to
stimulate diplomatically the progress of this multilateral strategy.

The key
question then becomes, in my opinion: is the necessary delay to ensure the
success of this strategy allowed?As stated in the introduction of our
seminar: "time is running out."We recently published in the Magazine of
Political Anticipation an analysis of U.S. foreign and domestic policies going
back over a century, and we showed that the policy of military Keynesianism at
work in this country led to a strong erosion of democracy, today already at a
level where we can anticipate that a significant portion of U.S. citizens in a
few years will be forced to follow the path of an open struggle against their
federal government. To the international pressure will follow for the U.S.
government a rapidly growing domestic pressure.[7]

Moreover,
the unveiling role of the world systemic crisis has occurred:

In two
days, 400 t of gold disappeared from the bullion banks [3]. At the same time
appears the loss of correlation between the official quotation of gold (that is
to say, gold paper quotation) and the physical gold which is now accessible
only through the addition of a premium which greatly increased, and is highly dependent on local supply. And finally
we need to point out the historical record forphysical gold importsby Asian countries in the first quarter,
including 300 t for China.

-
Second, the disclosure is evident in the growing number of leaked lists of
thousands of owners of bank accounts in tax havens since 2007 (beginning with
theLichtenstein thenSwitzerland[2]), in the investigations that the
States including those of the Anglo-Saxon pole are forced to conduct, and
finally in the growing regulation of automatic data exchanges from tax havens banks
to the fiscal administration in the state of residence.

These unveilings
are major factors accelerating the global systemic crisis, in its current
phase.

It
seems to me therefore essential not to abandon the multilateral strategy to
reform the international monetary system, but to quickly add to it another
initiative from the Euro-BRICS group.This second initiative draws on the
logic currently at work of global geopolitical dislocation, and I call it “Multipolar
Strategic Initiative for Resilience”.Its purpose is to minimize the effects
of currency war, and to complement the use of the many new bilateral swaps.

Our
proposition is to develop or create Special Administrative Regions for each
country of the Euro-BRICS group.These regions would be dedicated to
flows of goods traded by each country of the Euro-BRICS with the United States
and Japan, like the existing status for Hong Kong or Macau.The inclusion of the UK in this list of
special trade partners could be studied as well, but the process is made much
longer and uncertain for the euro zone because of the current European
treaties.Possible future voluntary exit from the European Union
by the UK would call for study its inclusion in this list.

Euro-BRICS
countries would not make any more invoicing or payments for goods selling directly
with the United States and Japan. Note that we consider for the moment only
flows of physical goods, that is to say, the greater part of the real economy.Import/export flows and re-invoicing would
be operated only using transhipment through the Special Administrative Regions
(SAR).The idea would be to use in these regions a different currency
than the one commonly used in Euro-BRICS countries, in the same way that the
Hong-Kong dollar is not the same currency than the yuan or renminbi. Current currencies would remain
convertible on the market.These Special Administrative Regions would concentrate
the risk of trading with countries with great variations in currency exchange
rates.Euro-BRICS countries would be able to regulate at will
the rate of exchange between their own currency and the one in force in their
own SAR. These SAR would be developed or created around major ports currently
used for trade with the USA and Japan.Registering not strictly necessary
financial activities (private funds ...) in these SAR will be discouraged.

Trade
between the Euro-BRICS countries should not be affected by the development of
the RAS, and if possible do not pass through them.These areas should be used only to build
a “firewall” (like when protecting IT networks) for trade with countries whose
observed policies have proven their unwillingness to respect the required governance
for an effective multilateral trade dialogue.

However,
it is desirable that the Euro-BRICS countries strengthen their abandonment of
the dollar as their international invoicing currency for trade between them,
including for oil products.The existing agreements should be amended accordingly.

The Multipolar
Strategic Initiative for Resilience is very flexible.Each country can progress at its own
pace in this direction, respecting the new cooperative logic of global
governance summarized by the expression of Evgenia Obitchkina: “the multipolarity
alongside the diversity." [8]

The
main advantage of such a "string of pearls" of RAS that would interface
with the United States and Japan, in addition to reducing the currency risk thanks
to the strict control of the exchange rate with the SAR and to the billing
terms that can be optimized, lies in the resilience of the international trade system
in case of default of major financial institutions in the United States or
Japan. For Euro-BRICS countries, financial defeasance structures (Special
Purpose Vehicles…) would be registered in the RAS and systemic risk would be more
contained without jeopardizing businesses and public debts of the Euro-BRICS
countries.

Finally
this initiative can be simply summarized: it is to organize and regulate the
interface between the dollar-yen area and the rest of the world. The trade and economic
size of the Euro-BRICS countries is sufficient to initiate the successful
containment of the systemic risk.

In a
second step, one could think about control of capital flows between the
Euro-BRICS countries and U.S. / Japan, but it seems to me less of a priority
and can be developed independently.The Asian crisis of 97 and the euro
crisis have already raised awareness of required significant exchange reserves
or alternative mechanism to dampen currency crises or sudden withdrawal of
capital by U.S. companies.

The
world of tomorrow, but also visible prospects out of the current global crisis
depends to a large extent on the qualities of the new international monetary
system and first its stability.The Multipolar Strategic Initiative for Resilience is
a new step towards a dual international monetary system resilient to global
systemic crises.As Deng Xiaoping stated: "One World, a dual
system" is the horizon to which we should move forward.And as saidRichard Fuller, “to change something we need to build a new model
that makes the existing model obsolete”.The mere mention of this possibility is
already a carried weight argument to improve the effectiveness of the
multilateral strategy.This new initiative is a potential source of true
political influence for the Euro-BRICS and for a growing synergy by network
effect.