Quantum Physics is Compatible with the Standard Model

This concept first arose around 2002.
In Sept 2006, it got its final proof. This presentation was first
placed on the Internet in October 2010.

There seems no doubt whatever that the approach in Physics that is
called Quantum Dynamics is absolutely compatible with the older approach
which is called the Standard Model. Any aspect which can be described
in either system can also be described in the other system.

The key distinction has to do with the time scale of the observations.

And the reason that they are compatible is due to the fact that there
is an Exception to the Conservation of Angular Momentum.

We will discuss a representative example, the one which was the initial
cause for the development of Quantum Physics. In the 1930s, all experiments
always resulted in observations where electrons orbited atomic nuclei
in very specific orbits. In fact, Physicists like Pauli described
"excluded orbits" as not being possible. Many experimental
results like this resulted in the conclusion that phenomena in nuclear
physics COULD only occur in quantum quantities.

Quantum Physics has been very handy in understanding many phenomena
in atoms and within nuclei themselves.

But this discussion will show that what is SEEN as quantum processes
are actually processes of Standard Model physics, with the important
added fact of having the Exception of the Conservation of Angular Momentum.

The matter of that Exception is discussed in a different web-page, but
an obvious example exists of it. If you take a normal child's gyroscope
or top and get it spinning, when you release the axle of it, there is
initially no precessional motion. That is, no kinetic energy of
precession and no angular momentum of precession. But as soon as
you release the axle, THE PRECESSIONAL MOTION ACCELERATES up to a fixed
rate. The kinetic energy of the new precession is exactly provided
by a slight lowering of the mass of the gyroscope/top in the gravitational
field, which used to be potential energy. But the new angular momentum
did not have any source of previous angular momentum. It just appears!

This exception only occurs as a result of gyroscopic precessional changes.
It happens to occur in the Solar System as planets perturb each other's
orbital motions. Around 1850, the brilliant mathematicians LaPlace,
Leverrier and others all concluded that planets cannot alter
each other's semi-major axis dimension by perturbation, which is easily
proven as long as both Conservation of Energy and Conservation of
Angular Momentum are true. This Exception of Conservation of
Angular Momentum permits very small and slow changes in the semi-major
axis of both planets as a result of mutual perturbation.

This is an effect which is quite subtle, and it is not significant
in just a few hundred or a few thousand orbits. But it becomes
important when millions of orbits have passed. As a result, the four
Galilean Moons of Jupiter have orbits which have orbital periods which
are clearly inter-related, and the solar system has many other examples
where this effect has occurred. The rings of Saturn have voids where the
orbital periods of the particles that would have been there would have
been intimately related to a nearby moon of Saturn. The moons themselves
have orbital periods which are similarly (nearly) synchronized.
Jupiter and Saturn have a Long Inequality. Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and
Neptune have a clear relationship. The asteroid belt has Kirkwood gaps
which are related to the orbital period of Jupiter. And so on.

The claim here is that this same effect, of rather slow modifications
of orbital periods of electrons, occur due to mutual perturbations
of electrons.

Electrons and all nuclear processes occur at amazingly fast rates.
Each electron orbits its nucleus many billions of times every second.
So in one one-thousandth of a second, each electron does millions
of orbits.

Therefore, IF we could observe electron motions in a trillionth of a
second, we WOULD see motions which are in compliance with Newton's
Laws and the Standard Model. But since we are not capable of that
fast of observing, and we only see the situation after at least a
millionth of a second has occurred after some disturbance, we only
see the QUANTUM effect, where the electrons have mutually perturbed
each other through millions of orbits, and therefore have resulted
in the STABLE arrangements we are familiar with.

So BOTH the Quantum view and the Standard view are perfectly valid.
The distinction has to do with the time scale available for observations.
Since atomic and nuclear processes occur so very rapidly, we do not
seem capable of doing any experiments where we see results of any
disturbance we cause before at least a millionth or a billionth of
a second has transpired, and so WE SEE results that always show
the expected Quantum results.

This is essentially saying that IF we were capable of seeing experimental
results a million times faster, we would see a GRADUAL CHANGE in the
orbital radii of the affected electrons over a period of millions of
orbits.

So in reality, there are no Excluded Orbits and there is no actual
Quantum basis for Physics, but due to our limitations of observational
abilities, experiments always SHOW effects that comply with Quantum
Dynamics.