The Jewish bankers want to eliminate the Central Banks which are tied to governments and replace those systems with entirely private banks under their complete control. Private banks which have no ties to any government, or union of governments, cannot make their notes legal tender. However, they can trade in commodities as currency, and then create their own fiat money through fractional reserve banking by issuing allegedly gold backed notes and electronic credits.

This is why the Jewish bankers want to bury the central banks and move us towards private gold based currencies. It will enable them to create a World currency which is completely under their control and beyond the control of any government.

In order for their money system to be completely outside the control of Goy governments and the people of the World, International Jewish bankers must addict us to the gold habit. Raw gold is truly international. It can be struck with a private mint mark and traded in every nation on Earth.

Gold can then be used in every nation, and the Jewish bankers can move it from one nation to another nation, cutting back on loans in one place while increasing them in another, building one up country while destroying others; which process will enable the Jewish bankers to accumulate all the property of the World in a short time, and ruin all the nations of the Earth. This is a far more efficient system for them then the central banks which can come under the influence of various governments, and which can be easily replaced by government owned and operated institutions.

Beyond this, the Jewish bankers control most of the gold in one way or another and will reap tremendous profits as they deliberately inflate the fiat currencies and ruin them one after another. Then, to meet the need for credit which cannot be met by raw gold, they will print fiat money and electronic credits and claim that there is gold in their reserves to back this paper and data when there is not, but no one will be allowed to attempt to verify or refute this fiction. That is what Ron Paul refers to as "freedom", the freedom of the Jewish bankers to cheat us and to create monopolies and cartels beyond the reach of any government.

This is why Ron Paul wants to transition us to completely privately owned gold banks. The coins they mint will be universal and entirely under the control of the Jewish bankers with no regulation by governments. It is the Jewish bankers' dream of a completely privately controlled bank which issues all the money of the entire World and regulates the money supply in every district. Paul is giving the bankers what they want in the name of fighting them, and millions of gullible idiots are gleefully cheering him on.

Ron Paul is closely tied to the late Ludwig von Mises through his ideas and the institute which bears his name. Ludwig von Mises was in turn closely tied to the Jewish supremacist and organizer of World Government, Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi. Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi promoted the idea of a European Union and a pan-American Union. Rothschild and Warburg sponsored him. Coudenhove-Kalergi also stated that the Jews are a superior race which should lead the World, but that all the other races should be mixed, which according to him would result in the manifestation of the worst traits and the disappearance of the best traits in the Gentile races. Zionist British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli had made similar claims.

Coudenhove-Kalergi wanted the different "races" to mix in intermarriage so that the children of these unions would be inferior to their parents and would lose any sense of cultural and ethnic heritage. He wanted to then substitute a new culture of obedience and servitude among this new degenerated "race", subservience to a ruling Jewish elite. He would have the Jews remain nobly segregated and preserve them as rulers over all others. It is a fact that many of Coudenhove-Kalergi's policies have been instituted. Ron Paul is fronting for these von Misian forces.

Eustace Mullins wrote of Ludwig von Mises and Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi,

"On May 1, 1776, Adam Weishaupt issued further instructions to the Illuminati in Bavaria, 'We labour first of all to draw into our Association all good and learned writers. This we imagine will be the easier obtained, as they must derive an evident advantage from it. Next to such men we seek to gain the masters and secretaries of the Post-Offices in order to facilitate our correspondence.' The Tasso family of Bologna, later Thurn und Taxis, gained control of post offices and intelligence work in Europe and held that power for five centuries. Although these groups surfaced as charitable or fine arts organizations, their goals of anarchy were concealed in all their efforts. In the twentieth century, they culminated in the League of Nations, the United Nations, the communist Party, the Royal Institute of International affairs, the Council on Foreign Relations, the foundations, and a host of lesser groups. Count Coudenhove-Kalergi's Pan Europe Movement, with its powerful backing by aristocrats and international financiers, was represented in the U.S. by its American branch, founded by Herbert Hoover and Col. House, who were also stumping the U.S. for ratification of the League of Nations. Coundenhove Kalergi mentioned in his autobiogrphy that he had been financed by the Rothschilds and Warburgs, and in the U.S., by Paul Warburg and Bernard Baruch. He was connected with the Thurn und Taxis family. His grandfather, Count Francis Coudenhove-Kalergi, Austrian Ambassador in Paris, had married Marie Kalergi in 1850. She was one of the wealthiest heiresses in Europe, descended from the Byzantine Emperor Nikophor Phikas; in 1300, when Venice was the dominant power in the Mediterranean, Alexios Kalergis had signed the treaty which made Crete a dominion on Venice. A recent premier of Greece, Emmanuel Tsouderos, was a Kalergi.

Melchior Palyi, in 'The Twilight of Gold', reveals the power plays of the World Order in international finance, when he quotes from the Diary of Governor Emile Moreau of the Bank of France. Palyi says, 'In October, 1926, Governor Emile Moreau of the Bank of France sent his closest collaborator to London to explore the intentions of Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England. Pierre Quesnay, then general manager of the Bank of France 1926-30, and Bank for International Settlements 1930-37, brought back a report which was recorded by Moreau : 'Quesnay also gives me interesting views about the ambitions of Montagu Norman and the group of financiers who surround him: Sir Otto Niemeyer, Sir Arthur Salter, Sir Henry Strakosch, Sir Robert Kindersley they are striving to make London the great international financial centre. But those close to Norman state this is not his objective ... he wants more than anything else to witness the setting up of links between the various banks of issue ... The economic and financial organization of the world appears to the Governor of the Bank of England to be the major task of the Twentieth Century. In his view politicians and political institutions are in no fit state to direct with the necessary competence and continuity this task of organization which he would like to see undertaken by central banks, independent at once of governments and of private finance. Hence his campaign in favour of completely autonomous central banks, dominating their own financial markets and deriving their power from common agreement among themselves. They would succeed in taking out of the political realm those problems which are essential for the development and prosperity of the national financial security, distribution of credit, movement of prices. They would thus prevent internal political struggles from harming the wealth and the economic advancement of nations.'

In short, Norman wished to see the imposition of the World Order over the financial affairs of the nations. It was this agreement among the central banks, rather than the front organization, the League of Nations, which became their final instrument of power. Crucial to these arrangements was the monetarist school, the Austrian School of Economics, an outgrowth of the Pan-Europe movement. Margit Herzfeld notes in her biography of Ludwig von Mises that he participated in Count Coudenhove-Kalergi's Pan Europe movement in 1943. He had been brought to the U.S. in 1940 by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation of $2500 a year to work at the Natl. Bureau of Economic Research, which grant was renewed in 1943. Von Mises' pupils, Arthur Burns and Milton Friedman now expound the monetarist theory through a network of supersecret 'conservative' think tanks led by the Mont Pelerin Society. Herzfeld says that von Mises' most famous protege was the Soviet apologist Murray Rothbard."—Eustace Mullins, "The Rule of the Order", The World Order: A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism, Chapter Eight.

Paul wants to create private gold banks, which obviously will be international and become the centralized entirely private Jewish controlled World bank Paul's bosses seek to institute as a mechanism of World control. This new Jewish monopoly on banking and gold will give World Jewry even greater control over money and it will be entirely detached from any country's government. This is the ultimate privatization of money creation and money supply which International Jewry has always sought. Even the system described in Carroll Quigley's book does not give World Jewry the power they will obtain under Ron Paul's system, which extant system has already done so much harm to the Third World and the American dollar,

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups."—Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time, Macmillan Company, New York, (1966) p. 337.

Ron Paul was heavily promoted by the Hollywood Zionist Jew Aaron Russo, who claimed a close personal friendship with the Rockefeller family and who didn't want us to talk about "Jewish bankers". Paul's ties to leading Zionists and his promotion by gold merchants and prominent figures in the "911 truth movement" who shy away from the proven Zionist Jewish and Israeli connection to 911, has been documented by others.

We most definitely do NOT want this man to be President of the United States of America. We have to find a genuine candidate and abandon Paul's candidacy in favor of an honest campaign.

Mike Huckabee is a salesman, not a leader. Like a used car salesman, he pitches his weaknesses as if they were strengths. Huckabee is weak, very weak, on the issues, issues which will be of increasing concern to Americans in 2008. This is a vulnerability in his campaign which is not being criticized as it should be by the media, who are instead promoting this huckster in Iowa, and affording him the opportunity to try to explain away his deficiencies without contradicting his sophistry.

Since Huckabee has no comprehensive set of policies, he paints this terrible failure as if it were a strength and claims that it makes him a "leader" instead of a "manager". What this shows is that he is a disingenuous con man, and that the media are not doing their job. People on the internet should seize on this opportunity to show both the weakness and hollowness of Huckabee, and the failure of the media to challenge Huckabee.

Huckabee's message is not "vote for me because I have a clear vision for America and here it is", but rather, "trust me, this car is a cream puff. . . Look at the cross on my neck. . . I swear to you this car is a cream puff. Would I lie to you? There's no need to look under the hood. Trust me, I'm smarter than you and have your best interests at heart. Now sign here. . ."

Huckabee is prostituting his religion. He is the televangelist of politicians and reminds me of Jimmy Swaggart, Ted Haggard and John Hagee. He has no real campaign so he hawks the cross and asks for donations.

It appears that the politicians smell blood. The current list of Republican and Democrat candidates are very weak and the best of bad is still bad. Bloomberg is obscenely wealthy, but are his wealth and media contacts enough to secure him a win? Let's hope not.

Americans are going to be concentrated on issues in 2008. Personality and persona are also always strong factors in an election. A third party candidate with the right issues just might stand a chance.

Third party candidates are notorious as spoilers. If Bloomberg throws his hat in the ring, the base of support needed to win a four way race becomes smaller than that needed to win a three way race. He has serious money and he will pull votes away from both the Democrats and Republicans, no matter who they run.

An anti-Zionist candidate could catch fire if the economy tanks, inflation hits hard, and war spreads. He or she could run on an anti-war, anti-media and anti-big money platform. The issues of jobs, credit, housing, health care and education are bound to be major issues in 2008. A Huey Long type of candidate who points the finger at the source of our woes might also bring out so many new voters to the polling booths, and the same old stale rhetoric from the other candidates might cause so many regular Democrats and Republicans to stay home on election day, that I believe there is a real chance for an anti-Zionist to win, especially if Bloomberg and others clutter the field.

How many anti-Zionists are there in America? How many more will there be come election day? How many disaffected and disgusted Democrats and Republicans will sit out the election, or turn to third party candidates? How many new voters can we register?

Anti-Zionism is beginning to resonate across America. The right conditions for a victory are bound to arise. We need a candidate and we need to organize. We also need to start interviewing genuine, viable, and gutsy candidates and get those interviews all over the internet. If we can do that, then you will see what a timid and shallow creature Ron Paul is by comparison, and perhaps we can draw his support to a real candidate who will fight for us. Paul is succeeding off of the efforts of others, not by way of his talents or charm. If we can hitch that team to someone who can deliver an honest speech telling the American People how we have been attacked and what we need to do about it, then we can win the presidency for our cause, or at the very least make it easier for anti-Zionist politicians to win in the near future.

Sunday, December 30, 2007

Perhaps the most amusing of responses to my arguments that Ron Paul represents the interests of the Jewish bankers has been that from the neo-Nazis who rush to Paul's defense by asserting that Paul represents values consistent with National Socialism and I am just a dumb "K**e" trying to trick the Goyim with the facts. I won't delve into their arguments which so obviously misrepresent the facts and my statements and which so obnoxiously violate fundamental logical principles, that they are false on their face. Forgive me for suspecting that these "neo-Nazi" groups are by and large the product of the FBI and Jewish organizations.

Let me state for the record that I believe National Socialism is also the product of Zionist Jewry [see, for example:Rome and Jerusalem: A Study in Jewish Nationalism by Moses Hess] and I oppose its racism, totalitarianism and warmongering. That said, let's examine the blind and stupid support of the neo-Nazis for Ron Paul, assuming for the sake of argument that it is not a contrived front, but is instead genuine.

Adolf Hitler sought a classless society and was vehemently opposed to laissez faire Capitalism. [See, for example:Triumph des Willens (Triumph Of The Will)] Hitler also asserted that the State had absolute control over property rights and that it was the State's duty and right to ensure the living standards of its citizens. [See, for example:The 25 Points of Hitler's Nazi Party] In addition, Hitler was vehemently opposed to the gold standard. [See, for example:Speech by Chancellor Hitler to the Nazi Party in Munich] Ron Paul, to his credit, is no Nazi, but he is supported by neo-Nazis who embrace him as their candidate without realizing that Paul represents precisely the Jewish capitalistic model against which the NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers Party) supposedly fought. Paul is also supported by the most radical Zionist Jews. These "neo-Nazis" would describe Hitler's beliefs as "K**e liberalism" if they had adequate knowledge of what Hitler actually believed. These same people embrace the Jewish Capitalism against which Hitler spoke.

Neo-Nazis are not the only group to embrace Paul and his policies in direct contradiction to their own Party's platform. Many environmentalists support Paul not realizing, or not caring, that Paul would hand over the care of our environment to international corporations that are eagerly awaiting the opportunity to exploit our resources, steal our wealth, and pollute our world; and Ron Paul would deny the People the right to intervene through our government to stop the destruction and pollution of the environment. [Listen to Dennis Miller's interview of Ron Paul] Ron Paul is setting us up for exploitation by the Jewish bankers, just as Boris Yeltsin set up Russia for the exploitation by Jewish oligarchs, based on the same false premise that the Jewish bankers' laissez faire Capitalism will protect us from exploitation.

World Jewry has made us so fearful of war, that many of us embrace their stooge as if a solution to the problems World Jewry are causing us, a timid and mediocre stooge who has made it clear that he will not confront the source of our problems. Similarly, many members of the "911 truth movement" fanatically support Ron Paul, who openly rejects them.

I attribute the foolish support of the enemy to many factors, the most influential of which are Jewish advertising and the desperation to which World Jewry are driving us through war and impending economic calamity. People who childishly call other people "Sheeple" are themselves playing the game of follow the leader and they are being led right off the cliff.

The Jewish bankers' plans are working well. They needed a populist leader through whom they could infect the mob with false beliefs so that the mob would attack those of us who are warning them of the danger. It is impressive to see how effective these simple strategies and tactics are for controlling the mass psychology of the gullible mob. It is my hope that we can seize control of this movement and place an authentic leader at the head of it. This will require that those who sincerely oppose the Zionists' plans to destroy our lives grow up and exercise sounder judgement.

Friday, December 28, 2007

A few objections have been raised to my arguments demonstrating that Ron Paul is serving the interests of the Jewish bankers, and that his policies spell disaster for the American Economy and the American People. I shall proceed to answer these objections:

1.) Objection: We need Ron Paul to save us from tyranny.

Answer: This Hollywood hero worship takes away our power as individuals and hands it over to a career politician. Hollywood Zionist Jew Aaron Russo helped create fear of tyranny in order to promote a Ron Paul type of "liberty" candidate. Before and during the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution, Jewry created the fear of the tyranny of monarchy, while Jewry concurrently created economic crises which they deceitfully blamed on the monarchy, pitting the People against the government and offering their stooges as if saviors of the People, angels sent from the Jewish bankers on golden wings who would bring "liberty, equality and fraternity" to the People. They instead brought death and destruction.

The "Ron Paul Revolution" is following the same Jewish cabalistic model for revolution and will produce the same results of wars, dictatorship and the ruin of the intellectual class. Jewish bankers are deliberately ruining our economy. Jewry is exploding our debts with wars and scapegoating the American system as if it were the problem, when they are the problem. Jewry is tossing us onto the two horns of a dilemma, in which we are forced to choose between their warmongers and their goldmongers as candidates for president. Jewry creates the problems, then Jewry offers up their faux "solutions", based not on logic and facts, but rather on emotion and advertising.

This is similar to the Jewish tactic of creating world wars so that the people clamor for peace, then offering up the idea of world government as if a solution to war, viz. WW I & II, the League of Nations and the United Nations. World Jewry creates tyranny and ruinous monetary policy, then offers up Ron Paul as if a solution to tyranny, a supposed solution that nets them a gold standard on the back of the premise of "restoring the Constitutional Republic".

The blind laissez faire Capitalism advocated in this drive for "freedom" will enable the wealthy to grow even wealthier and to drive out the middle class, leaving only subjugated serfs and the super-rich in America. The lack of regulation will also permit massive pollution and exploitation of the environment. Note that Ron Paul supporters are being duped into ignoring the destruction of the living environment of the Earth, in the name of "freedom" and opposition to "World Government". Note that Ron Paul and Aaron Russo did not go after the root cause of our economic problems, which is the Israeli infiltration of our government and press. They instead sought to grant these enemy forces more "freedom" with which to destroy us.

The model World Jewry has used time after time is to deliberately bring a society into pain, then offer up their stooges as if a solution. Note the typically Jewish style of advertisement for Ron Paul, which is meant to create a cult of personality. It is almost circus-like, portraying the mediocre and timid man as if he were a roaring giant who will rescue us all. Note the fanatical mantra that we are doomed if we do not surrender our fate to the allegedly great Ron Paul. Note that all criticism of Paul is met with vicious ad hominem attack, or silence. The Ron Paul promotion and the circumstances in which we find ourselves at the hands of World Jewry, are as I described them long ago in, among many other places, my book The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein, page 1000 (see also p. 47ff.), where I wrote,

"In 1913, the creation of the Federal Reserve together with the creation of the Federal Income Tax made war an immensely profitable venture. The Jewish bankers had at last a means to tax the American People and heat up the economy and then collapse it in the Great Depression by contracting the money supply, which created a wonderful buying opportunity for them in that it forced others to sell and yet maintained the value of the bankers' money enabling them to buy up whatever they wanted to buy.

It appears that another trap is today being set for the American Public. Americans will be asked to chose between the gold standard as one panacea, or an international currency issuing from a central world bank as another panacea. Either option could ruin the nation. Poseurs serving the interests of the Jewish bankers, bankers who are driven by greed and religious fervor to place all of the wealth of the world in Jewish hands, will step forward and ridicule the bankers and the Federal Reserve and might even scapegoat all Jews including assimilated Jews. These propagandists will be the agents of the bankers themselves and they will offer up the poisoned fruit of the gold standard. Jewish bankers control most of the gold in the world and if America were to adopt the gold standard it would transfer America's wealth into the hands of Jewish bankers. America would lose its sovereignty to the prophesied Jewish world government and ultimately the gold will be melted down and shipped to Jerusalem severely contracting the money supply and destroying all Gentile economies (Genesis 47).

America's gold should be recovered by legal and military means and reparations and damages, as well as the principal and accrued interest stolen from the American economy by Jewish bankers should be recovered. However, the method of securing the lasting value of American money most likely to succeed is for the American Government to issue its own notes and so pay down the debt without accruing more debt. This cannot be done by adopting a gold standard."

2.) Objection: Gold is not used in fractional reserve banking, but fiat currency is created by fractional reserve banking.

Answer: Every society has a need for credit. To meet that need, bankers have long issued bank notes with a promise that these notes are redeemable as specie payments in gold and silver. This increases the money supply and promotes growth. Bankers do not maintain 100% reserves for these loans and note issues, and create fiat money that cannot be redeemed should there be a run on the bank and all the notes be returned for specie payments in gold and sliver.

Answer: Typically, when the Jewish bankers succeed in manipulating a given society into accepting their gold standard monetary model, the nation borrows the gold from the bankers, who in turn loan it to themselves, compounding the money supply with fiat money which everyone pretends is specie money. This gold purchase/loan creates a debt which must be paid in gold and is not debt free. It also accrues interest, the money with which to pay must be created through the fiat of fractional reserve, or with additional borrowing, or some combination of the two.

Government issued fiat currency, on the other hand, can be created without creating debt. It does not have to be paid back to anyone, and can be created and retired at any time so as to maintain growth and stable price levels, if those are sound objectives of the nation at any given time. Fiat money is not "just paper" unless and until it is made so through recklessness, corruption, or both. American fiat money can have value as legal tender and as an instrument with which to purchase the goods and services of Americans. A title on a house is not "just a piece of paper" and money which can be used as legal tender and which has value as a means to purchase American goods, services and property is not "just a piece of paper".

Our dollar is losing value not because it is "just a piece of paper", but rather because of Jewish wars and economic policies. Gold currency would not cure these problems, and paper currency is not to blame for them, though both can be used to facilitate the destruction when Jewry so desires it. The international Jewish lust for destruction must be confronted in order to solve the problems we face. Gold as currency will only give Jewry a further means for exploitation.

4.) Objection: Gold and silver have a stable value, while fiat currency is inflationary and manipulated.

In the last few decades, gold values have fluctuated from about 850 dollars an once to about 250 dollars. Many of Paul's advocates object that this change in value is due to manipulation and collusion; but, if true, this proves that gold prices can be manipulated, and that gold is not a stable means of regulating price levels. In fact, gold can be taken away from a nation, or poured into a nation, greatly affecting the price levels of any nation that bases its currency on gold. In addition, gold and silver values fluctuate relative to one another.

Paul advocates often assert that Nixon created the present crisis by refusing specie payments on US dollars. What would they prefer, that all of the gold of the US be syphoned off to other nations and that we be left without currency and in debts which we had no currency with which to pay? This is a proven danger of gold based systems as I demonstrated recently in my blog Ron Paul, Friend or Foe? Part 2. Consider the turmoil the bankers can cause in a gold standard system by simply cutting back on loans, foreclosing, shipping gold out of the country, and creating runs on the banks. For example, The Chicago Tribune reported on 27 February 1867 on page 2,

"The Rothschilds of Rome.

[Rome Correspondence of the London News.]

Who, whether he has set foot in the Eternal City or no, has not heard of the Torlonias—the Rothschilds of Rome? In the course of last summer, when the monetary crisis here was at its height, Don Alessandro Torlonia—the acting head of the house—won extraordinary popularity by writing a letter to the Pope, in which he offered to buy up the unconvertible Government paper, and substituting a metal currency in its place, providing that the existing managers of the Roman Bank, with Cardinal Antonelli's brother at their head, were sent about their business, and the direction confided to himself. At that time it was quite impossible to get notes converted into coin at any price for the simple reason that there was no coin in the bank. Even now, when things have improved somewhat, it is with the utmost difficulty that you can get change for a scudi note, even at shops in the Corso, and there is not a hotel keeper or a tradesman in Rome who would even look at a five scudi note if you were sufficiently ignorant of the state of things here to present it in payment in the expectation of getting any change out. Of the small pieces of silver, which you obtain with no little difficulty, many are so worn and thin that they seem in a sort of transition state between sliver and paper, and have long since lost all trace of any image or superscription whatever.

So rolling in wealth is Don Alessandro Torlonia that his riches are admitted to be literally untold, and only this much is known certain, that everything in Rome worth having, except the Pope and St. Peter's, already belongs to him. No wonder then that at the Vatican Don Alessandro should be looked upon as a hardly less dangerous character than Victor Emanuel himself, and that the insulting offer which he made last summer to buy up the Holy Father, and add him so his possessions, should have been decidedly rejected, though it had not entailed the removal of an Antonelli from a lucrative place. On his first appearance in public after making the above mentioned patriotic offer, Don Alessandro received such an ovation as has not been witnessed in Rome since those of which Pius IX. was himself the object, when he gave the first impulse to the Italian Revolution in 1846. This Don Alessandro is the same Torlonia who risked his whole fortune on the gigantic enterprise of draining the Fucine Lake, the issue of which struggle with nature was so long doubtful that it became a common saying in Rome, 'Either Torlonia will drain the Fucine Lake, or the Fucine will drain Torlonia.' In the end, however, Torlonia got the better of the lake, and redeemed about one hundred thousand acres of land for cultivation. Over what was a few years ago a barren waste of waters, flourishing crops may now be seen waving every harvest time, and with last year's produce Don Alessandro had a scheme of feeding the now almost starving Roman people by selling them bread of his own baking at a reduced rate. Such, at least, was the account of the story given me by a patriotic and exceedingly liberal Roman, who made a severe case against the Government out of the stoppage of Torlonia’s extensive bread baking-by-machinery works, which threw some two hundred workmen out of employment just a fortnight ago. I am bound, however, to add that, on proceeding to the spot and making inquiries, I learned quite a different version of the affair, entirely exculpating the Government from any direct interference in the matter. Only this much is certain, that the works are stopped, and that the Roman people stand little chance, at present, of getting their bread at reduced rates."

5.) Objection: Since the Jews control the media, why would they need Ron Paul and a populist movement to institute a gold currency system?

Answer: Not all Zionists and media people are aware of the Jewish bankers' plans. In fact, very few are and many others, if made aware of them, might well oppose them. Servants of the Jewish bankers instead have been taught how to think and act. They act reflexively based on this training. They must, therefore, be subtly and often deceptively made to support people they otherwise would reflexively demonize. In addition, they control all sides of the debate, including the media stars of the anti-Paul crowd, so they can withdraw mainstream criticism of Paul if they so desire, and so that they can control Paul by hanging the threat of Jewish media attack over his head. They have done this with Bush and 911. They control the "911" truth movement and turn up the heat on Bush when they want to pressure him. But they also pull back when he obeys. They also have the means to make a press martyr of Paul by attacking him in the media, or reserve him as one of their players as events unfold in the World economy.

A means is always necessary to accomplish a result. Whether the Jews use their control over the media, or their control of Ron Paul, or combine these forces, they are still exercising their control through a means under their control. The important facts to consider are that they must use an instrument, and they call the tune.

There is, however, a specific reason why they use Ron Paul and the gold merchants who support him. The reason is that many people know that a gold currency system would be a disaster for the United States, and is a gateway to a worldwide currency, which would enable private interests to control the money supply of every individual district on Earth, and thereby demand absolute obedience and have the means to create genocides of famine. The Jewish bankers require a populist movement and the stupid blind force of the mob in order to lead the lemmings off the cliff, and in order to pit the People against those who know the facts and who will try to inform the People of the dangers of World Jewry's plans.

The gold idea will not save us. How will we get the gold to use as currency without borrowing it at interest? How will we pay back the loan on this gold without giving up the principle of the loan, which is the gold we require for a money supply, plus the interest on the borrowed gold, which interest does not exist as money, but which must be borrowed in order to pay back the initial loan plus interest? How will we pay off the national debt without sending our gold overseas and contracting our money supply into a depression?

Would you take out a loan to buy a loaf of bread that required you to pay back that debt with that same loaf of bread, plus another loaf of bread as interest? What could be gained through such a loan? You have not the benefit of the bread, and have accrued an obligation to instead provide another with a loaf of bread, which extra loaf of bread you must borrow with the promise to pay back it plus yet another. . . No one would knowingly do this.

Why should we borrow gold from the Jewish bankers in order to have money, when we will have to pay back that same gold, plus more gold as interest, in order to pay back the loan? Why should we do this when we, as a sovereign People, have the right to make our own debt free money through our government at minimal expense?

Why does Ron Paul want to again deliver us into the hands of the Jewish bankers as if doing so were a solution to the problems which the Jewish bankers have already deliberately caused us? There will be many economists and others who will explain the inanity of the proposal for using gold for money. Jewry must pit the mob against those who are warning them of the dangers of the gold standard, without revealing the fact that Paul is working in the bankers' interests. They do this by pumping up Paul as if he were a comic book superhero, who is above criticism.

I do not hear Ron Paul calling for the prosecution of the Jewish bankers. I do not hear Ron Paul demanding that we take back from the bankers what they have stolen from us. In this respect, he serves as the controlled opposition to the bankers and effectively shields them from prosecution.

In order to maintain control and exercise influence, the Jewish bankers have to put on a show. These bankers are few in number and are widely disliked. Their best means for controlling and destroying a nation is to have the citizens of that nation control and destroy one another. The Jewish bankers have often created "controlled opposition" political parties and financed stooges who criticize the bankers themselves. The Communists have always been a controlled opposition to the Jewish bankers, and the Communists' funding, training, support, etc. has always come from the Jewish bankers themselves. Communism is a trap which lures the nations into slavery on the false promises of "freedom" and "economic reform". What is the Libertarian Party?

The Jewish bankers destroyed Russia by duping the Russian People into destroying themselves with bogus promises of "freedom" and "economic reform". The Jews then maintained their control over Russian Slavs by encouraging people to turn in their family members, friends, neighbors, etc. to the Cheka, NKVD, and then the KGB. The Jewish bankers used their puppets to syphon off the wealth of Russia, while these same puppets pretended to the Russian People that they were in opposition to the "Capitalist bankers".

Note that George Bush ran on a platform opposed to "nation building" and American intervention overseas. Then Bush started two wars and destroyed two nations. Paul openly avows that he is running on George W. Bush's campaign platform. It is a gallows for America. We have a known enemy in World Jewry and have to confront it directly and unapologetically. Slogans accomplish nothing other than the slavery of the electorate to a cult of personality.

6.) Objection: If the Jewish Bankers Control the Federal Reserve and the American Government, why do they need Ron Paul to replace the Fed and change government policy in their favor?

Answer: One must understand how the Jewish bankers control the American Government and the American People. The objection, here posed as a question, presumes the false premise that control is magical and requires no intermediary means. For example, one could ask, based on the tacit premise in this objection, "If a driver controls a car, why does he need an engine in the car? If the driver really controlled the car, then the car would not need an engine, only a driver!" Obviously, the driver controls the car through the use of the engine.

The Jewish bankers control the government and the American People by use of stooges and dupes in the government and controlled agents in the media. They also control the government and the American People by creating and promoting propaganda which dupes the People into a false understanding of the issues.

For example, when the Jews wanted to overthrow Russia, they created revolutionary propaganda and distributed it to Russian prisoners of war in the Russo-Japanese War. They thereby made the Russian People clamor for the destruction of their own society and created networks of soldiers and officers who would blindly do the Jews' bidding because they had been led into false beliefs.

This is what the Libertarian Party, Hollywood Zionist Jews including Aaron Russo, and the gold merchants' information and communication networks, have done for the Jews in relation to the gold standard. When the Jews wanted to destroy Russia, they used the press to smear the Czar. They used their agents to cause crippling and unjust strikes, which caused the economy to collapse. They cut off Russia's access to money markets. They brought Russia into war.

The Jewish bankers are presently doing the same to the US. Ron Paul is there to make us clamor for the gold and silver which will bury us as a sovereign nation, in the name of defending our sovereignty. Bear in mind that the Jewish bankers could not seize control over Russia without their stooges Lenin and Trotsky. The Jewish bankers cannot make us clamor for gold and silver without their stooges in the gold trade and characters like Ron Paul. They need a means by which to exert control. They need a means by which to dupe the American People into instituting their plans. Ron Paul is one of the means. Without any means, the Jewish bankers would be powerless; but that does not mean that they are powerless. They are men of means.

Ron Paul will not cause the downfall of the Fed. The Fed is about to fail because the Jewish bankers have deliberately created a crisis, and the Federal Reserve will need to be replaced. Ron Paul is there to provide one of the bankers' preferred methods of replacing the Fed, just as Nelson Aldrich was there to provide the bankers' solution when the bankers created the crisis of 1907. They do not need Ron Paul to cause the Fed to fail, but rather as a stooge to forward their agenda and manufacture in the public a clamor for the very things the bankers want to have happen, but which are not in the public's interest.

Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. was very aware of the fact that the bankers had deliberately caused the panic in 1907 in order to make the public clamor for banking reforms, banking reforms the bankers would draft which would give them complete control over the money supply and wipe out the lower level, but numerous, competing banks,

"When the Aldrich-Vreeland Emergency Currency Bill was sprung on the House in its finished draft and ready for action to be taken, the debate was limited to three hours and Banker Vreeland placed in charge. It took so long for copies of the bill to be gotten that many members were unable to secure a copy until within a few minutes of the time to vote. No member who wished to present the people's side of the case was given sufficient time to enable him to properly analyze the bill. I asked for time and was told that if I would vote for the bill it would be given me, but not otherwise. Others were treated in the same way.

Accordingly, on June 30, 1908, the Money Trust won the first fight and the Aldrich-Vreeland Emergency Law was placed on the statute books. Thus the first precedent was established for the people's guarantee of the rich man's watered securities, by making them a basis on which to issue currency. It was the entering wedge. We had already guaranteed the rich men's money, and now, by this act, the way was opened, and it was intended that we should guarantee their watered stocks and bonds. Of course, they were too keen to attempt to complete, in a single act, such an enormous steal as it would have been if they had included all they hoped ultimately to secure. They knew that they would be caught at it if they did, and so it was planned that the whole thing should be done by a succession of acts. The first three have taken place.

Act No. 1 was the manufacture, between 1896 and 1907, through stock gambling, speculation and other devious methods and devices, of tens of billions of watered stocks, bonds, and securities.

Act No. 2 was the panic of 1907, by which those not favorable to the Money Trust could be squeezed out of business and the people frightened into demanding changes in the banking and currency laws which the Money Trust would frame.

The Act No. 3 was the passage of the Aldrich-Vreeland Emergency Currency Bill, by which the Money Trust interests should have the privilege of securing from the Government currency on their watered bonds and securities. But while the act contained no authority to change the form of the bank notes, the U. S. Treasurer (in some way that I have been unable to find a reason for) implied authority and changed the form of bank notes which were issued for the banks on government bonds. These notes had hitherto had printed on them, 'This note is secured by bonds of the United States.' He changed it to read as follows: 'This note is secured by bonds of the United States or other securities.' 'Or other securities' is the addition that was secured by special interests. The infinite care the Money Trust exercises in regard to important detail work is easily seen in this piece of management. By that change it was enabled to have the form of the money issued in its favor on watered bonds and securities, the same as bank notes secured on government bonds, and, as a result, the people do not know whether they get one or the other. None of the $500,000,000 printed and lying in the U. S. Treasury ready to float on watered bonds and securities has yet (April, 1913) been used. But it is there, maintained at a public charge, as a guarantee to the Money Trust that it may use it in case it crowds speculation beyond the point of its control. The banks may take it to prevent their own failures, but there is not even so much as a suggestion that it may be used to help keep the industries of the people in a state of prosperity.

The main thing, however, that the Money Trust accomplished as a result of the passing of this act was the appointment of the National Monetary Commission, the membership of which was chiefly made up of bankers, their agents and attorneys, who have generally been educated in favor of, and to have a community interest with, the Money Trust. The National Monetary Commission was placed in charge of the same Senator Nelson W. Aldrich and Congressman Edward B. Vreeland, who respectively had charge in the Senate and House during the passage of the act creating it.

The act authorized this commission to spend money without stint or account. It spent over $300,000 in order to learn how to form a plan by which to create a greater money trust, and it afterwards recommended Congress to give this proposed trust a fifty-year charter by means of which it could rob and plunder all humanity. A bill for that purpose was introduced by members of the Monetary Commission, and its passage planned to be the fourth and final act of the campaign to completely enslave the people.

The fourth act, however, is in process of incubation only, and it is hoped that by this time we realize the danger that all of us are in, for it is the final proposed legislation which, if it succeeds, will place us in the complete control of the moneyed interests. History records nothing so dramatic in design, nor so skillfully manipulated, as this attempt to create the National Reserve Association,—otherwise called the Aldrich plan,—and no fact nor occurrence contemplated for the gaining of selfish ends is recorded in the world's records which equals the beguiling methods of this colossal undertaking. Men, women, and children have been equally unconscious of how stealthily this greatest of all giant octopuses,—a greater Money Trust,—is reaching out its tentacles in its efforts to bind all humanity in perpetual servitude to the greedy will of this monster.

I was in Congress when the Panic of 1907 occurred, but I had previously familiarized myself with many of the ways of high financiers. As a result of what I discovered in that study, I set about to expose the Money Trust, the world's greatest financial giant. I knew that I could not succeed unless I could bring public sentiment to my aid. I had to secure that or fail. The Money Trust had laid its plans long before and was already executing them. It was then, and still is, training the people themselves to demand the enactment of the Aldrich Bill or a bill similar in effect. Hundreds of thousands of dollars had already been spent and millions were reserved to be used in the attempt to bring about a condition of public mind that would cause demand of the passage of the bill. If no other methods succeeded, it was planned to bring on a violent panic and to rush the bill through during the distress which would result from the panic. It was figured that the people would demand new banking and currency laws; that it would be impossible for them to get a definitely practical plan before Congress when they were in an excited state and that, as a result, the Aldrich plan would slip safely through. It was designed to pass that bill in the fall of 1911 or 1912."—C. A. Lindbergh, Banking and Currency and The Money Trust, National Capital Press, Washington, D.C., (1913), pp. 92-98.

It is inevitable that people will be angry with the bankers as the American economy collapses under the weight of the crises the bankers have caused. That is what they want. In order to control the process of replacing the Fed, the bankers require an agent who pretends to oppose the bankers, an agent who will trick the People into demanding the "reforms" the bankers want to institute, or they need a dupe. If they had someone who openly worked for the bankers, no one would trust that person. Given that control of the World and countless trillions of dollars are at stake, you can be certain that the Jewish bankers have such a stooge or dupe, and who better fits the mold than Ron Paul, a Congressman who has been petitioning for the replacement of the Fed for some time?

Consider how mass psychology works. The Jewish bankers want us to go on some kind of gold standard. Obviously, they will try to convince us that this is in our best interests even though it is not. Just as they had agents and dupes who promoted Communism as a sound system beyond their influence, they will have agents and dupes who promote the myth that gold is "sound money" beyond their influence.

You wouldn't look to tobacco companies for advice on the negative effects of tobacco use. Why you look to gold merchants and Hollywood Jews for advice on the benefits and dangers of the gold standard?

The use of Ron Paul and the Libertarian Party as controlled opposition to the bankers is very much like the use of false flag terrorism. When World Jewry wants the US to attack another nation against the interests of the US, Jews perpetrate a false flag attack so that the American People demand that their politicians act against those whom Jewry want to attack. They then have their most trusted stooges wave the flag, talk about "freedom" and demand the war that Jewry wants.

When World Jewry wants the US to change the banking system in a way that benefits them, they crash the economy with a manufactured crisis. They then have their most trusted stooges wave the flag, talk about "freedom" and demand the banking system that Jewry wants.

7.) Objection: Ron Paul is fighting against the Zionists and the Zionist do not want to see him elected President of the United States.

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Allow me to preface this article with the statement that I hope Ron Paul wins the Republican primaries. Sometimes we need a Santa Claus to believe in if only to inspire us to hope. Sometimes we need a stooge to show us the way to empower ourselves.

Whether Paul wins the primaries, or not, the American People have won by way of an example as to how to organize and side step the media. That said, I am not naive. I have observed that the organization in support of Ron Paul has not come from the grass roots, but rather from the gold mines, gold merchants and Zionist Hollywood Jews. But do not let me spoil your belief in Santa until we have found a way to replace the illusion with American factories and sound currency issued by the People for the People.

Gold is not sound currency. It is a limited commodity the supply of which can be artificially and privately reduced and increased by way of fraud and collusion. Jewish bankers will demand the "freedom" to treat gold as a privileged commodity, the "freedom" to monopolize it in cartels, etc.

True freedom is best secured by a well educated and prosperous populace, and Ron Paul's domestic policies will not get us there.

I suspect that Ron Paul is running for President for one reason and one reason only. He is a tool of the Jewish bankers and their goal is to make us clamor for "banking reforms" which they have drafted and which will grant the bankers amnesty and/or immunity for their crimes; and which will bail the bankers out at the expense of the taxpayer; and which will secure debts owed to the bankers with hard, seizable assets and make them profits off of precious metals and allow the international Jewish bankers to continue to control the American money supply, regulate price levels, govern international trade, hinder or stimulate growth, etc.

Jewish organizations, Jewish controlled politicians and the Jewish controlled media are undermining our civil liberties, making us desperate to secure our natural rights which are recognized in the Constitution. Since Jewry has made us clamor to protect our rights, they are using Ron Paul to forward a deceptive message that the Constitution is our guarantee of rights and that it must be strictly adhered to in terms of Ron Paul's interpretation of it. They have created a dilemma and they are proposing their solution to the dilemma that they have deliberately created.

Our rights are secured by our existence and our ability to defend them, not by Ron Paul or the Constitution. The Constitution is rather a social contract which recognizes our natural rights and serves as an enforceable agreement. If the courts and other branches of the government are corrupt, the Constitution is not a protection, but only a guide, and the contract has been breached. However, our rights and other means of enforcing our rights remain.

I believe that Paul is wrapping himself in the Constitution for one reason and one reason only. He, and those who pull his strings, want us to interpret the following part of the Constitution to mean that we should operate our economy on gold based currency:

"Article 1, Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."

This is why Paul speaks in glittering generalities of "freedom" and honoring the Constitution. In fact, he wants to take away our freedom to issue our own money through our government and without the intercession of the Jewish gold merchants. He wants to take away our freedom to recover our losses from the Jewish bankers. He cowers from confronting the traitorous Jewish fifth column which is stealing away our civil liberties.

If we truly want to secure our liberties and enforce those rights iterated in the Constitution, then we have to fight back against organized Jewry. This does not interest Paul. For him all that glitters in his glittering generalities is gold, and our fundamental human rights are only props on the stage.

It appears that Ron Paul's goals are to secure the interests of the bankers, not our freedom. As the Jewish bankers maintain control over our economy and monetary system, they will maintain control over our lives. We have to fight for our rights, not by enslaving ourselves to gold, but by bettering ourselves through education and hard work, through savings and personal and social discipline; and by confronting our enemy directly and unapologetically.

World Jewry has brought us into perpetual war, which nets them profits and forwards their Zionist agenda for Mid-East hegemony and World rule. By controlling the cast of candidates for US President, Jewry has left us shredded on the two horns of another dilemma. We can elect their openly warmongering candidates, or we can elect their gold plated stooge. Our interests are not served by either side of the bull charging from behind to gore us in the rear.

We already elected a supposedly anti-war Congress and they have betrayed us. This traitorous Jewish controlled Congress can declare war at any time, no matter who is, or is not, elected President. We have to raise our voices in outrage and demand our government serve our interests. We have to demand the Congress prosecute the criminals Bush and Cheney. Then we will have power.

Electing Ron Paul gives him power, not us. We will have power when we exercise it directly through boycott, demonstrations, public debate, civil disobedience, etc. I do not see Ron Paul organizing such action which empowers the People, but then he is a politician trying to get elected and what he is doing is working.

I wish him success. Perhaps, if by hook, crook or miracle, Paul wins the Republican primary, or even if he gives a strong showing, some genuine candidate will appear to run as a third party candidate. In any event, it will be healthy for Americans to become enthused about having alternatives, if only in an illusion. This will make it easier for others to enter the arena, but I caution against the hero worship which is being so heavily promoted.

Ron Paul is not a great man. His policies are unoriginal, scripted, simplistic and little more than disingenuous gimmicks to win support from the gullible and uninsightful for the Jewish bankers to again seize control of our money supply. By wrapping himself in the Constitution without enunciating sound policy, Paul is just like Huckabee, who is trying to win and serve Jewish interests by standing on the cross. We need to elevate the debate so that we can empower ourselves, not childishly worship the rather mediocre Ron Paul and play follow the leader.

Let Paul continue with his glittering generalities—that is politics in Jewish controlled America. We have to raise the level of debate among ourselves. No one will do it for us, and we have to defeat those who stand in our way.

Why is it that the talentless warmongering snake John Bolton has been so successful and slithered up the sandy slopes to the highest levels of international politics? Why are his villainous face and treacherous voice all over the Jewish controlled media?

In search of an answer, consider John Robert Bolton's ties to Zionist Jewry and their leash on him:

Without Jewish control over the mass media and the US Government, Bolton would be ignored as the sick joke that he is; but then again, if Jews did not control the media and American Government, it is doubtful that a sycophant like Bolton would be dancing to their tune.

"[O]ne needs to recognize that there is real anti-Semitism in the Armenian community, and scapegoating of Israel and Zionism often goes well beyond the issues and becomes a cover for deeper hatreds. The Dashnaks, Hitler's wartime buddies, who are still a presence both within Armenia and in the diaspora, have jumped on the anti-Israel bandwagon, championing the Palestinian cause on American campuses."

Russell does not mention why some Armenians oppose Zionism. He merely implies that critics of Zionism are, merely by virtue of their criticism of Zionism, racists. He does not acknowledge that Zionism is itself widely considered to be a racist and ethnocentric ideology.

Furthermore, while attacking Armenians, Russell does not mention the reasons why Armenians have reacted to the Jewish campaigns to exterminate them and remove the Armenians from their ancestral homeland. Indeed, Russell makes no mention of the Jewish role in the Armenian genocide, instead scapegoating Moslems.

Portraying Jews as if perpetual innocent victims, Russell attacks the Armenian revolutionary party of the Dashnaks and implies that they pose a danger to Jews. However, he fails to discuss the Jewish revolutionary parties which genocided 1.5 million Armenians, which Jewish mass murderers were led by the Jew Talaat Pasha.

A correspondent for the Times of London wrote in an article, "THE ARMENIAN MASSACRES: EXTERMINATING A RACE: A RECORD OF HORRORS", which was published on 8 October 1915, on page 5,

"TALAAT BEY'S POLICY

It is said by the Turks in their defence that the decision to deport the Eastern Armenians was only arrived at after the discovery of an Armenian plot in Constantinople and after the Van outbreak. But the Armenians executed in Constantinople in April were men of the Hintchak society who had been in prison for over a year, and the deportation or massacre of Armenians had begun at many places before the Van Armenians were criminal enough to help themselves. There can be no doubt that Enver, who has never shrunk from violent methods, approved of the policy that was adopted. Commanding officers in the provinces received orders in April and May authorising them to deport all individuals or families whose presence might be regarded as politically or militarily dangerous, and in the case of some of the Cilician Armenians, deportation had begun earlier. But Talaat, who was in all probability the chief mover in the expulsion of Greeks from Western Anatolia, who has never scrupled to lie to an Ambassador or to encourage pro-Turkish intrigue in the dominions of friendly Powers, is the chief author of these crimes. 'I intend to prevent any talk of Armenian autonomy for 50 years' and 'The Armenians are a. . . race; their disappearance would be no loss' are sayings attributed to him on excellent authority. He has had worthy supporters among the extremists of the Committee of Union and Progress, such as Mukhlis Bey, Carusso Effendi and his Jewish revolutionary supporters, Midhat Shukri and others, among officials such as the Valis of Diarbekr and Angora, and among the officers of gendarmerie, who, if one-tenth of the tales told by European and American refugees is true, have cast off all trace of the European training which French and British officers laboriously tried to instil in them and have too often become little better than licentious banditti.

[***]

DEPORTATION OR STARVATION

It remains to describe Talaat Bey's methods in detail. Massacre was followed by a crueller system of persecution than Abdul Hamid ever invented. The Red Sultan's abominations were seldom accompanied by the wholesale deportation of the survivors; the violation and abduction of women and the conversion of children, though sadly frequent in some places, were by no means general in the massacres of 1894-1896. Then the wild beast was allowed to run amok for 24 hours, and was then usually chained up.

In Talaat Bey's campaign the preliminary massacre, which was sometimes omitted, was followed by the separation of the able-bodied men from their women folk. The former were drafted into labour battalions or simply disappeared. The women, children, and old men were next driven slowly across country. They were permitted to take no carts, baggage animals, or any large stock of provisions with them. They were shepherded from place to place by gendarmes, who violated some of the women, sold others, and robbed most. Infirm or aged folk, women great with child, and children were driven along till they dropped and died by the way. Gendarmes who returned to Alexandretta described with glee to Europeans how they robbed the fugitives. If these refused to give up their money their escort sometimes pushed them into streams or abandoned them in desolate places.

A European who witnessed the exodus of some of the Armenians of Cilicia says that most were footsore, all looked half starved, and no able-bodied man could be seen among them. At Osmanic on the road between Aleppo and Adana they were given only 8 hours' notice by the town crier to make ready for their departure. The French and British refugees from Urfa saw the bodies of "hundreds" of women and children lying by the road and met another of these lamentable half-starved caravans. An American who accompanied a group of Armenian exiles from Malatia reports that the road to Urfa was marked all along its course by the bodies of those who had died. Travellers by the Anatolian Railway report that the hills near Bilejik Geive, and other stations in the hinterland of Brusa were crowded with Armenians from Brusa, Ismid, and other settlements near Constantinople, who had no shelter and were begging their bread. Large bodies of the exiles are said to have been simply led into the desert south of the Euphrates and left there to starve.

[***]

The attempts of the American Ambassador to procure some alleviation of the lot of the Armenians have thus far proved unsuccessful. Mr Morganthau, in the opinion of good observers, wasted too much diplomatic energy on behalf of the Zionists of Palestine, who were in no danger of massacre, to have any force to spare. Talaat and Bedri simply own that persecuting Armenians amuses them and turn a deaf ear to American pleadings. German and Austro-Hungarian residents in Turkey at first approved of the punishment of Armenian 'traitors', but the methods of the Turkish extremists have sickened even Prussian stomachs. True the Jewish Baron von Oppenheim, now in Syria, has been preaching massacre, and the German Consular officials al Aleppo and Alexandretta have followed suit, perhaps with the idea of planting German colonists in the void left by the disappearance of the Armenians when the war is over. [colored emphasis added]"—http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2641064.ece / http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2641064.ece?token=null&offset=24

On 9 August 1911, on page 3, The London Times published a Letter to the Editor from the Time’s Constantinople Correspondent, under the heading "JEWS AND THE SITUATION IN ALBANIA", which stated,

"I will merely remark that, according to information which I have received from genuine Freemasons, the majority of the lodges founded under the auspices of the Grand Orient of Turkey since the revolution were, at the outset, avatars of the Committee of Union and Progress, that they have not yet been recognized by British Freemasonry, and that the first 'Supreme Council' of the G. O. of Turkey appointed in 1909, contained three Jews (Carasso, Cohen, and Faraggi) and three Doenmes (Djavid Bey, S. Kibar, andOsman Talaat). [colored emphasis added]"

Marcelle Tinayre published an article in L’Illustration in December of 1923, which was translated into English and published as "Saloniki", The Living Age, Volume 320, Number 4156, (1 March 1924), pp. 417-421, at pages 419-420,

"The Jewish community, driven from Aragon in the sixteenth century, settled in Saloniki, where it has never ceased to grow and multiply. The Turks always showed themselves less anti-Semitic than the Greeks. They let the Jews of Saloniki grow rich and troubled them with no competition, because 'business'—that is to say, the manipulation of other people's money—is forbidden or at least not favored by the Koran, which prohibits taking pledges and receiving interest. Nevertheless the agreement between the masters of the sword and the masters of the gold, between the koniak and the money bench, was disturbed in the seventeenth century. A cabalist and a charlatan, a kind of Simon the Magician, passed himself off as the Messiah for whom Israel still waits and will be waiting to the end of time.

Sabbetai Sevi struck the fancy of the Israelitish throng to such an extent that the Sublime Porte was disturbed. An envoy of the Sultan requested the pretended Messiah to make a choice between the bowstring and recantation. Sabbetai Sevi, not quite sure that he was divine after all, chose to recant, and with great courage became a Mussulman. His disciples followed his example by hundreds, but neither the Prophet nor his disciples gave Mohammed anything more than words and gestures. They had Mussulman tongues but Israelitish hearts. Under the shelter of the turban and the fez, beneath a Turkish name worn as a mask, they remained what they always were and what they still are. Their women cover themselves with the tcharchaf, their children learn to read the Koran, their young men enter Government offices,—sometimes, though more rarely, the army,—but when they are twelve years old these deunmehs, or converts, receive the revelation of their secret or Hebrew names. They are initiated into the mysterious rites established by Sabbetai Sevi. They learn the whereabouts of that famous hidden temple which is said to be in old Saloniki, which neither Christian nor Moslem has ever approached.

The double faith makes double souls, and this age-long imposture behind true Mussulman beards prepares conspirators and revolutionists. The deunmehs of to-day, affiliated with Free Masonry, instructed in Occidental universities, often professing total atheism, have given leaders to the Young Turk revolution.Talaat Bey, Djavid Bey, and many other members of the Committee of Union and Progress were deunmehs from Saloniki. Long ago the great Turkish families were split in twain, one party being these modern Turks who deal with the foreigner, and these hanoums—who walk the streets with unveiled faces and set young officers, if they have been reading Pierre Loti, to dreaming—bear in their faces proof enough of their lineage. [colored emphasis added]"

Inspector-General of the Turkish Forces in Armenia and Military Governor of Egyptian Sinai during the First World War, Rafael De Nogales wrote in his book Four Years Beneath the Crescent,

"Among the civil members of [the Committee of Union and Progress], only one was conspicuous by force of personality. That was the renegade Hebrew (donme) of Salonika, Talaat, the principal organizer of the massacres and deportations, who, fishing in muddy waters, succeeded in raising himself from the humble rank of postal clerk to that of Grand Vizier of the Empire. [clolored emphasis added]"

Instead of attacking the Armenians, Russell should be apologizing to them for the genocide which racist Jews committed against Armenians.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Ron Paul's base appears to be a bit naive when it comes to politics. Politics is a dirty business. To win, you have to fight.

For example, when Ron Paul is attacked as if a racist, his supporters should point out that the media is largely silent on Mitt Romney's Mormonism. They should expose the racist beliefs of that religion, and its ties to Zionism. Let people know that Glenn Beck and many other Zionists are Mormons. The media will lose credibility, as it should. Romney will lose support, as he should. And Ron Paul's fans will defend him by taking the offensive.

If people accuse you of making religion an issue, tell them that they have confused you with Mike Huckabee. And why hasn't the Zionist media slammed Huckabee for pimping religion at a time of crisis in American politics? Why haven't they raked Zionist John Hagee over the coals for stating that Jesus was not the Messiah and did not come to be the Messiah?

Paul supporters can point out how racist Zionism is and that the media, which is in Zionist hands, is silent on that issue. Demonstrate their hypocrisy, instead of apologizing to them.

When Ron Paul is attacked as if a conspiracy theorist, his supporters should point out that John McCain is Islamophobic and believes that Moslems are responsible for all the woes which Bush's Islamophobia has caused. They are the real conspiracy theorists, and the media does not report on it. The media instead sponsor these Islamophobic conspiracy theories, which have caused the deaths of millions of innocent Moslems and cost us lives and 3.5 trillion dollars. Talk about George Bush's conspiracy theory that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, a theory he still advances even after the NIE debunked it. Accuse McCain of McMadness for sponsoring this lie and calling for us to "Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran!"

When Ron Paul is attacked for his associations, point out Rudy Guilian's associations. For example, point out Guiliani's support for former New York Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik. Accuse Romney, Guiliani and McCain of disloyalty to America for their associations with top Zionists.

When Paul is attacked for allegedly not being a Republican, point out that John McCain is endorsed by the liberal Democrat Joe Lieberman. Why? Because they are both agents of the Israeli Government.

Prove to people the Zionist corruption of Romney, McCain and Guiliani. Emphasize their warmongering rhetoric. Show their speeches at Jewish organizations and messages to Herzliya.

In sum, it is not enough to cheerlead for Ron Paul. You also have to discredit his opponents. It is important to not fall back on your heels, but rather to charge forward. Do not appear to be on the defensive, but rather force the openly Zionist candidates to defend themselves and their traitorous support of racist Israel. In this way, even if Ron Paul does not win, his candidacy will accomplish a great deal and it will show the power of the American People to counter-attack against the Israeli fifth column that is destroying America. If they want to make racism the issue, it will be easy to bring down Romney, McCain and Guiliani and in so doing expose racist Zionism and the Israeli infiltration of American politics.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Back on 10 May 2007, I published a blog entitled Ron Paul, Friend or Foe? in which I noted the reasons why I do not trust Ron Paul, together with the reasons why I find his candidacy appealing. A known subversive, who often attempts to parrot my statements when it serves his agenda, has taken to reiterating some of my arguments as to why we need to examine Ron Paul's positions.

The fact that this known saboteur and provocateur is attacking Paul may, at first glance, appear to be a good reason to support Ron Paul. This mindless blowhard often sends the same signals as Fox News, though basing his message on a supposedly anti-Zionist position. He has teamed up with a Jewish banker who attacks Capitalism from a Marxist-lite perspective. It appears that this man, who is trying to gin up a nihilistic revolution, wants to dupe real anti-Zionists into serving Zionist interests. However, this known smear monger makes it a habit to defame everyone and sow the seeds of discord, so little can be gleaned from his attack on Ron Paul, other than that it is a part of an overall strategy to render anti-Zionists confused and politically fragmented.

I like Ron Paul's open opposition to American aggression. He is the only serious candidate to consistently oppose aggressive war. The President does have a bully pulpit and can affect foreign policy. However, it is Congress which declares war.

Ron Paul's positions on immigration are too shallow for my liking. But what really worries me are his sympathies with the Libertarian Party and with Ludwig von Mises.

The production and promotion of the film Freedom to Fascism by the Zionist Jew Aaron Russo, the Christian bashing though inexplicably philo-Judaic film Zeitgeist, and slew of internet propaganda promoting the institution of the gold standard, all coinciding with the presidential race and the melt down of the dollar is a bit too coincidental for my liking. It is reminiscent of the orchestrated meltdown of 1907, which was followed by the "banking reforms" of 1913, which were promoted by Sen. Nelson Aldrich. Paul appears to me to be another Aldrich, but there are worse parasites than an Aldrich. The other candidates have each openly declared their aggressive stance toward Iran and unquestioning loyalty to Israel.

Whatever Ron Paul's sincere beliefs and motivations may be, the Libertarian's ties to Ludwig von Mises and Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi are troubling. Coudenhove-Kalergi promoted the idea of a European Union and a pan-American Union. Rothschild and Warburg sponsored him. Coudenhove-Kalergi also stated that the Jews are a superior race which should lead the World, but that all the other races should be mixed, which according to him would result in the manifestation of the worst traits and the disappearance of the best traits in the Gentile races.

Coudenhove-Kalergi wanted the different "races" to mix in intermarriage so that the children of these unions would be inferior to their parents and would lose any sense of cultural and ethnic heritage. He wanted to then substitute a new culture of obedience and servitude among this new degenerated "race", subservience to a ruling Jewish elite. He would have the Jews remain nobly segregated. It is a fact that many of Coudenhove-Kalergi's policies have been instituted.

Paul does not appear to support these policies, but instead opposes them. It is very important to note this fact. However, Paul would empower these forces by instituting the Ludwig von Mises monetary policy. Ludwig von Mises was an Austrian Jew who was close friends with Coudenhove-Kalergi.

Paul wants to eliminate taxes from gold and silver exchanges, thereby artificially creating a privileged commodity and business class. This makes him the darling of gold merchants, and of certain Zionist Jews, like the late Aaron Russo. Indeed, Paul has been embraced by the Israelis and received their seal of approval. He has also found support among media Jews who comment on the financial markets.

Paul and von Mises essentially proposed a banker bailout of the current system, which would indemnify the Jewish bankers, effectively grant them amnesty, and pass along the burden of their theft to the American taxpayer, all in the name of combating the bankers—very Aldrichesque methodology. The bankers hold much of the gold, and we would have to borrow it from them at interest to finance a gold based currency, thereby placing us in unpayable debts and excusing them for their fraud against the American People.

Another real danger of the disastrous Paul and von Mises plan is the ability it would give the Jewish bankers to control our money supply and create deadly deflation at their whim by melting coin and shipping it overseas. So that this does not appear to be a personal prejudice of mine, I will quote from two authors who opposed the Jewish bankers, L. B. Woolfolk, and Denis Fahey, who wrote in his book, The Rulers of Russia, Third Edition, Revised and Enlarged, USA, (1986), 93-96:

"Lest some of my readers may think that I have insisted too much upon the disastrous effects of the monetary system associated with the gold-standard, a few words may be helpful. Money or token-wealth has been invented, to use St. Thomas's expression, for the convenience of exchange and as a measure of things saleable. Thanks to it, families can procure, by the process of exchange, far more easily than by barter, that sufficiency of nature's goods or real wealth needed by their members for a virtuous life. The fact is, however, that the gold-standard system does not aim at the distribution of socially-produced wealth but at making money a source of revenue to the issuers and a means of arriving at the greatest possible control for them by the creation and perpetuation of debt. As a measure of things saleable, money is meant to be stable. The yard measure and the pound avoirdupois may not be altered arbitrarily. Yet 'we are in an age of monetary policy,' writes Professor Soddy, 'when the value of it is continually altered by the means well-known to the banking profession, to make it worth less or more, thus to raise the price level or to lower it. . . In all this there is not given a moment's consideration to the most elementary principles of justice to the owners of the money, who have a right to receive again value equivalent to that which they have given up.'[Footnote:The Role of Money, p. 85 'A sane money system is one that aims at keeping in circulation the largest volume of money that can be absorbed without inflation of the price level . . . the principle of control of the currency of New Zealand should be changed from stability of the exchange rate with sterling to stability of the internal price level.'—(A. N. Field, in Examiner, May, 1939.)] Arbitrary changes in the volume of currency cause prices to rise or decline; and these arbitrary changes affect the welfare of every citizen. How are they effected? By the contraction and expansion of credit due to movements of gold. Thus we have fixed foreign exchanges with fluctuating internal price-levels. Those who control gold can manipulate the volume of credit, thus controffing the price-level in different countries. And this power can be used to acquire mortgages not only over entire industries but over whole countries. We read in The Builders' Merchants' Journal (January, 1939): 'For instance, by the judicious transference of (say) ten millions of gold from France to England, a systematic depreciation of probably ten times that amount could be brought about in the market value of French securities without undue difficulty, and a corresponding rise effected on the English Exchange. By then transferring the same amount of gold from London to New York, a similar double effect could again be achieved. Next, by transferring the gold from the U.S.A. to (say) Belgium and the Netherlands, the process could be once more repeated. Then by switching the bullion across to England, a similar rise and fall would result. Finally, by shipping the gold from London back to its original resting-place in Paris, French securities would be restored to normal, and British stock values again depressed. The alteration in market values in the case of every gold transfer as above outlined would probably be at least ten times the amount of the bullion actually shipped, and the astute individuals engaged in the execution of this interesting financial roundabout might within the space of two or three years amass (via nominees) anything from (say) £100,000,000 to £500,000,000 by judiciously exploiting the possibilities of the markets—and without arousing outcry or general suspicion amongst the investing public. No wonder it becomes possible for banks and other big financial interests to hold 'blanket' mortgages not only (in effect) over entire industries, but also (to all practical intents and purposes) over whole countries.'

A concrete example of the swindling depicted by The Builders' Journal is given by the late Arthur Kitson in his book, The Bankers' Conspiracy, published in 1933. On pages 79 and 80 of that work, we read: 'Some years ago the Bankers' Magazine gave a startling example of the depreciation in the prices of 325 of our representative investments caused by the withdrawal of £11,000,000 in gold from the Bank of England by a group of American financiers. The transfer of this amount from London to New York during a period of a few weeks caused a fall of prices equivalent to £115,500,000! The absorption of the same gold caused a corresponding advance in the prices of certain American securities. By first selling English securities and buying American, they had merely to transfer so much gold and afterwards reverse the transactions by buying and selling respectively and the game was won! As a well-known financial writer stated at the time: 'These speculators were playing upon two tables at the same time—one in London and the other in New York—with the certainty of winning on both.''

When a country has been impoverished and disorganised by a stock-exchange coup such as has just been mentioned, an attack on the property of the Catholic Church and the religious orders can be successfully launched by the Masons and other anti-supernatural elements. A typical example is to be found in Spain between 1834 and 1840. The Rothschilds were anti-Carlist in the war of succession, which was going on, because they feared that the success of Don Carlos would mean that they would lose the famous Almaden quicksilver mines. By a 'bear' operation on the stock-exchange the Rothschilds sent Spanish securities tumbling down. The Prime Minister, Count Toreno, was forced to resign, and the Rothschilds realised a profit far beyond the amount of the bribe they had given him previously. Count Toreno was succeeded by Mendizabal, a Jew by race and religion. He had been speculating in Spanish securities but had 'got the tip' from Nathan Rothschild when the Rothschilds decided to bring about the slump. Mendizabal increased the Spanish deficit. All that and more can be learned from Count Corti's Reign of the Houses of Rothschild. It will serve as a commentary on the laconic information we get in the Catholic Encyclopedia (article on Spain) wherein we read: '. . .the Liberals ruled, except in the provinces occupied by the Carlists, and the moderate ministry of Martinez de la Rosa . . was succeeded by those of Toreno and of Mendizabal, who put up the possessions of the Church for sale (1836).' The Catholic Encyclopaedia omits to say that all the convents, with some exceptions, had been confiscated in 1835.[Footnote: 'More than one hundred years ago, the Church in Spain was disestablished and despoiled of all real property, while the Religious Orders were suppressed and dispersed under the laws framed by Don Jose de Mendizabal, a Finance Minister of that day.' (The Conflict in Spain, by the Marquis de Merry del Val.)] It makes no reference to the collusion between Rothschild and Mendizabal.

Stabilization of the internal price level of countries is one of the most needed social reforms in the natural order. Without it the demand for social justice becomes a mockery. 'Stabilizing money takes the money factor out of price fluctuation and leaves just the non-monetary factors of demand and supply of commodities. As one well-known writer on these subjects has pointed out, the money factor is like the tides of the ocean, and the commodity demand-and-supply factor is like the waves of the sea. . . . The tides are the big factor determining the level of the water, and the waves a comparatively small factor even in the greatest storm. The money factor is like the tides, and is the principal thing in determining the price-level.' [Footnote: A. N. Field in Examiner, May, 1939. He says elsewhere in the same issue: 'Money must be made a just measure of value. If it is not, every money transaction perpetrates injustice, with debts on one level and prices of commodities on another level. And injustice sooner or later means the disintegration of the existing social order.']"

L. B. Woolfolk wrote in his book, Great Red Dragon, or London Money Power: The Foreign Money Power in the United States, George E. Stevens, Cincinnati, (1890), pp. 273-274:

"3. Let us notice the effect upon us of the Money Power withdrawing $1,100,000,000 of gold and silver from the country, and keeping the greenbacks retired from circulation.

1.) By presenting the gold and silver certificates at the Treasury, and drawing the gold and silver they call for, the gold and silver certificates would be withdrawn from circulation.

2.) Then, by withdrawing the rest of the gold and silver, we would be left with nothing but the greenbacks and the National Bank circulation.

3.) But the $346,000,000 of greenbacks have already been, in great measure, retired from circulation. They are all owned in the great money centers, chiefly by the Money Kings, or their agents. When the Money Kings shall be desirous of bringing on a crisis, they will, of course, keep the greenbacks retired.

4.) This would leave us only the National Banking circulation of $239,000,000. By presenting the National Bank circulation at the counters of the banks, and drawing out the gold in their vaults, the Money Kings could compel the National Banks to suspend specie payments, and contract their circulation at least one-half. Then we would be left with only about $120,000,000 of National Bank notes in circulation.

But the greater part of the national banks are owned by the Money Kings, who could withdraw their circulation, if they chose to do so.—It is evident that the Money Kings can, in three months, if they wish, reduce our currency in circulation to less than $100,000,000.

They have got the greenbacks locked up now: and a banker has recently proposed to retire all the greenbacks, and substitute for them silver coin. If this were done, the Money Kings could ship our silver and gold to India, and Africa, and China, and Japan, and South America, to stimulate the industry of those regions, and would leave us almost entirely without currency.

They can easily do this. They only need the excuse of a panic to justify them in doing it. And they could start the panic at any moment by breaking a few National Banks; which can easily be done by drawing out their specie and forcing them to suspend specie payments. In 1837, the Money Kings brought on the panic, by continuing to draw gold from the banks of New York City until they were compelled to suspend specie payments. They brought on the crisis of 1857, by drawing several million dollars of gold from the vaults of the Trust Company Bank in Ohio. That bank was evidently on a sound basis. So now, they can break any or all of our National Banks in a week, and force them to suspend specie payments, or go into bankruptcy.

Our currency is now a trap, with the triggers all set, ready to fall whenever the Money Kings choose to touch it off. The condition of the currency needs to be remedied, or we shall have, some day, the most terrible crisis that ever ruined a country. It will not do to have our currency so completely at the mercy of the Money Kings.

This is the state of things we need to remedy."

While the gold merchants tout gold as if a solution to inflation, deflation is as bad or worse than rampant inflation, in that it cripples growth and makes it easy for the wealthy to purchase all the wealth and businesses of the nations, and leads to starvation. It is the cause of depressions. The Rothschilds were caught creating depressions in the Nineteenth Century, as reported on in The Chicago Tribune.

By robbing a nation of its gold and silver coinage, Jews were able to destroy that nation’s economy by depriving it of its money supply. Jews were also able to increase the value of gold and silver as they accrued a monopoly over it.

The Chicago Tribune, reported on 17 August 1870 on page 4,

"FRANCE.

Special Despatch to The Chicago Tribune.

NEW YORK, Aug. 16,—A Paris letter to the World remarks that Messrs. de Rothschild are said to lose several thousand dollars a day on the money they keep idle in their safe, or, rather, vault. One of their most lucrative branches of business is dealing in bullion, and melting and refining gold. The government has ordered them to discontinue this business. The Messrs. de Rothschild are not looked upon with a favorable eye by the government. It is notorious that their sympathies are all German. They have not contributed a son to any of the war funds. You know nine-tenths of the banking business of Paris is in the hands of German bankers. The police watch them very closely. It is even rumored that one of the wealthiest of them was arrested yesterday for sending large amounts of money out of France. The Bank of France refuses to touch the paper of men suspected of extorting bullion. At the last discount day one of the firms under this suspicion sent in 600,000 francs worth of paper to be discounted. Every cent of it was returned, refused.

In Switzerland matters are still worse. The banks have suspended specie payments, and have refused to discount any notes except those of manufacturers in the neighborhood, and these only in sums sufficient to keep the manufactories running. The interdiction to export gold from France presses with a heavy weight upon Switzerland. It and the banks’ refusal to discount have forced all commercial firms in Switzerland to suspend payments. Men whose books show them to be worth millions are compelled to suspend payments, because none of their assets are available. It is impossible to get a bill on Paris cashed anywhere, and all but impossible to get a bill on London cashed. Travellers are advised by bankers here to take with them gold enough to pay their expenses.

The outflow of gold from France continues to be enormous, despite all the measures taken. This necessarily so. Last week the French Government was obliged to send $15,000 in gold to Spain to pay for the wheat, wine, oil, brandy, etc., bought there by the government agents."

Legend has it that the Rothschilds demonstrated that they could break the Bank of England at any time by demanding specie payments. The Chicago Daily Tribune published the following article on 21 February 1877 on page 2,

"NATHAN ROTHSCHILD.

-------------------

His Little Scrimmage with the Bank of England.

Somewhere near a score of years ago, I think, I read the story, then fresh. It has been recalled to my mind by its telling in my presence to an English gentleman, who assured us that he could personally vouch for its truth, he having had business with the old lady of Threadneedle street while the transaction was in progress; and, from this assurance of an eye-witness, I deem the thing worth repeating. I think I remember it as it was told to me.

A bill of exchange, for a large amount, was drawn by Anselm Rothschild, of London. When the gentleman who held it arrived in London, Nathan was away, and he took the bit of paper to the Bank of England, and asked them there to discount it. The managers were very stiff. With haughty assurance they informed the holder that they discounted only their own bills; they wanted nothing to do with the bills of 'private persons.' They did not stop to reflect with whom they had to deal. Those shrewd old fellows in charge of the change of the realm should have known and remembered that that bit of paper bore the sign manual of a man more powerful than they,—more powerful because independent of the thousand-and-one hampers that rested upon them.

'Umph!' exclaimed Nathan Rothschild, when the answer of the bank was repeated to him. 'Private persons! I will give those important gentlemen to know with what sort of private persons they have to deal!'

And then Nathan Rothschild went at work. He had an object in view,—to humble the Bank of England,—and he meant to do it. He sent agents upon the Continent, and through the United Kingdom, and three weeks were spent in gathering up notes of the smaller denominations of the bank's own issue. One morning, bright and early, Nathan Rothschild presented himself at the bank at the opening of the teller's department, and drew from his pocketbook a five pound note, which he desired to have cashed. Five sovereigns were counted out to him, the officers looking with astonishment upon seeing the Baron Rothschild troubling himself personally about so trivial a matter. The Baron examined the coins one by one, and, having satisfied himself of their honesty in quality and weight, he slipped them into a canvas bag, and drew out and presented another five pound note. The same operation was gone through with again, save that this time the Baron took the trouble to take a small pair of scales from his pocket and weigh one of the pieces, for the law gave him that right. Two—three—ten—twenty—a hundred—five hundred pound notes were presented and cashed. When one pocketbook had been emptied another was brought forth; and when a canvas bag had been filled with gold it was passed to a servant who was in waiting. And so he went on until the hour arrived for closing the bank; and at the same time he had nine of the employes of the house engaged in the same work. So it resulted that ten men of the house of Rothschild had kept every teller of the bank busy seven hours, and had exchanged somewhere about £22,000. Not another customer had been able to get his wants attended to.

The English like oddity. Let a man do something original and piquant, and they will applaud even though their own flesh is pricked. So the people contrived to smile at the eccentricity of Baron Rothschild, and when the time came for closing the bank, they were not a tenth part so much annoyed as were the customers from abroad, whose business had not been attended to. The bank officials smiled that evening but—

On the following morning, when the bank opened, Nathan Rothschild appeared again, accompanied by his nine faithful helpers, this time bringing with him as far as the street entrance four heavy two-horse drays, for the purpose of carting away the gold, for to-day the Baron had bills of a larger denomination. Ah, the officers of the bank smiled no more, and a trembling seized them when the banker monarch said, with stern simplicity and directness:

'Ah, these gentlemen refuse to take my bills. Be it so. I am resolved that I will keep not one of theirs. It is the house of Rothschild against the Bank of England!'

The Bank of England opened its eyes very wide. Within a week the house of Rothschild could be demanding gold it did not possess. The gentlemen at the head of affairs saw very plainly that in a determined tilt the bank must go to the wall. There was but way out of the scrape, and they took it. Notice was at once publicly given that thenceforth the Bank of England would cash the bills of Rothschild as well as its own!—Exchange."

"XXVIII. The next thing is that charge about the Jewish gold. And this, forsooth, is the reason why this cause is pleaded near the steps of Aurelius. It is on account of this charge, O Laelius, that this place and that mob has been selected by you. You know how numerous that crowd is, how great is its unanimity, and of what weight it is in the popular assemblies. I will speak in a low voice, just so as to let the judges hear me. For men are not wanting who would be glad to excite that people against me and against every eminent man; and I will not assist them and enable them to do so more easily. As gold, under pretence of being given to the Jews, was accustomed every year to be exported out of Italy and all the provinces to Jerusalem, Flaccus issued an edict establishing a law that it should not be lawful for gold to be exported out of Asia. And who is there, O judges, who cannot honestly praise this measure? The senate had often decided, and when I was consul it came to a most solemn resolution that gold ought not to be exported. But to resist this barbarous superstition were an act of dignity, to despise the multitude of Jews, which at times was most unruly in the assemblies in defence of the interests of the republic, was an act of the greatest wisdom. 'But Cnaeus Pompeius, after he had taken Jerusalem, though he was a conqueror, touched nothing which was in that temple.' In the first place, he acted wisely, as he did in many other instances, in leaving no room for his detractors to say anything against him, in a city so prone to suspicion and to evil speaking. For I do not suppose that the religion of the Jews, our enemies, was any obstacle to that most illustrious general, but that he was hindered by his own modesty. Where then is the guilt? Since you nowhere impute any theft to us, since you approve of the edict, and confess that it was passed in due form, and do not deny that the gold was openly sought for and produced, the facts of the case themselves show that the business was executed by the instrumentality of men of the highest character. There was a hundredweight of gold, more or less, openly seized at Apamea, and weighed out in the forum at the feet of the praetor, by Sextus Caesius, a Roman knight, a most excellent and upright man; twenty pounds weight or a little more were seized at Laodicea, by Lucius Peducæus, who is here in court, one of our judges; some was seized also at Adramyttium, by Cnaeus Domitius, the lieutenant, and a small quantity at Pergamus. The amount of the gold is known; the gold is in the treasury; no theft is imputed to him; but it is attempted to render him unpopular. The speaker turns away from the judges, and addresses himself to the surrounding multitude. Each city, O Laelius, has its own peculiar religion; we have ours. While Jerusalem was flourishing, and while the Jews were in a peaceful state, still the religious ceremonies and observances of that people were very much at variance with the splendour of this empire, and the dignity of our name, and the institutions of our ancestors. And they are the more odious to us now, because that nation has shown by arms what were its feelings towards our supremacy. How dear it was to the immortal gods is proved by its having been defeated, by its revenues having been farmed out to our contractors, by its being reduced to a state of subjection."—M. T. Cicero, Pro Flaccus, Chapter 28; translated by C. D. Yonge, The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, Volume 2, George Bell & Sons, London, (1880), pp. 454-455.

The ancient Jews ruined Egypt by syphoning off the gold. Jews accused themselves of stealing the Egyptians’ gold by asking to borrow it from their trusting Egyptian neighbors, then emigrating without giving it back (Exodus 11:2; 12:35-36). Joseph stole the gold of Egypt and ruined its money, then enslaved the Egyptian People (Genesis 47).

Genesis 47 states:

"1 Then Joseph came and told Pharaoh, and said, My father and my brethren, and their flocks, and their herds, and all that they have, are come out of the land of Canaan; and, behold, they are in the land of Goshen. 2 And he took some of his brethren, even five men, and presented them unto Pharaoh. 3 And Pharaoh said unto his brethren, What is your occupation? And they said unto Pharaoh, Thy servants are shepherds, both we, and also our fathers. 4 They said moreover unto Pharaoh, For to sojourn in the land are we come; for thy servants have no pasture for their flocks; for the famine is sore in the land of Canaan: now therefore, we pray thee, let thy servants dwell in the land of Goshen. 5 And Pharaoh spake unto Joseph, saying, Thy father and thy brethren are come unto thee: 6 The land of Egypt is before thee; in the best of the land make thy father and brethren to dwell; in the land of Goshen let them dwell: and if thou knowest any men of activity among them, then make them rulers over my cattle. 7 And Joseph brought in Jacob his father, and set him before Pharaoh: and Jacob blessed Pharaoh. 8 And Pharaoh said unto Jacob, How old art thou? 9 And Jacob said unto Pharaoh, The days of the years of my pilgrimage are an hundred and thirty years: few and evil have the days of the years of my life been, and have not attained unto the days of the years of the life of my fathers in the days of their pilgrimage. 10 And Jacob blessed Pharaoh, and went out from before Pharaoh. 11 And Joseph placed his father and his brethren, and gave them a possession in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land, in the land of Rameses, as Pharaoh had commanded. 12 And Joseph nourished his father, and his brethren, and all his father's household, with bread, according to their families. 13 And there was no bread in all the land; for the famine was very sore, so that the land of Egypt and all the land of Canaan fainted by reason of the famine. 14 And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh's house. 15 And when money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in thy presence? for the money faileth. 16 And Joseph said, Give your cattle; and I will give you for your cattle, if money fail. 17 And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for horses, and for the flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them with bread for all their cattle for that year. 18 When that year was ended, they came unto him the second year, and said unto him, We will not hide it from my lord, how that our money is spent; my lord also hath our herds of cattle; there is not ought left in the sight of my lord, but our bodies, and our lands: 19 Wherefore shall we die before thine eyes, both we and our land? buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give us seed, that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate. 20 And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the famine prevailed over them: so the land became Pharaoh's. 21 And as for the people, he removed them to cities from one end of the borders of Egypt even to the other end thereof. 22 Only the land of the priests bought he not; for the priests had a portion assigned them of Pharaoh, and did eat their portion which Pharaoh gave them: wherefore they sold not their lands. 23 Then Joseph said unto the people, Behold, I have bought you this day and your land for Pharaoh: lo, here is seed for you, and ye shall sow the land. 24 And it shall come to pass in the increase, that ye shall give the fifth part unto Pharaoh, and four parts shall be your own, for seed of the field, and for your food, and for them of your households, and for food for your little ones. 25 And they said, Thou hast saved our lives: let us find grace in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh's servants. 26 And Joseph made it a law over the land of Egypt unto this day, that Pharaoh should have the fifth part; except the land of the priests only, which became not Pharaoh's. 27 And Israel dwelt in the land of Egypt, in the country of Goshen; and they had possessions therein, and grew, and multiplied exceedingly. 28 And Jacob lived in the land of Egypt seventeen years: so the whole age of Jacob was an hundred forty and seven years. 29 And the time drew nigh that Israel must die: and he called his son Joseph, and said unto him, If now I have found grace in thy sight, put, I pray thee, thy hand under my thigh, and deal kindly and truly with me; bury me not, I pray thee, in Egypt: 30 But I will lie with my fathers, and thou shalt carry me out of Egypt, and bury me in their buryingplace. And he said, I will do as thou hast said. 31 And he said, Swear unto me. And he sware unto him. And Israel bowed himself upon the bed's head."

This story taught the Jews that they could ruin any nation if they could control the nation’s money supply. They controlled the money supply by melting down gold and silver and keeping the metals for themselves. Once they had ruined metallic currency, the Jews could then operate on a barter system with the subjugated Gentiles.

Protocol 20 of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion states:

"PROTOCOL NO. XX

TO-DAY we shall deal with the financial program, the discussion of which I have postponed until the end of my report because it is the most difficult, conclusive, and decisive point in our plans. In approaching it, I will remind you that I have already intimated that the result of our actions is measured in figures.

When we become rulers, our autocratic government, for the sake of self-defense, will avoid burdening the people with heavy taxes, and it will not forget the role it has to play, namely, that of Father and Protector. But as government organization is costly, it is necessary to raise the means for its maintenance. Consequently, we must carefully work out the plan of a fair distribution of taxation.

In our government the sovereign will have the legal fiction of owning everything in his kingdom (which is easily put into practice), and can resort to legal confiscation of all money in order to regulate its circulation throughout the country. Consequently, the best method of taxation is the levying of a progressive tax on property. Taxes will thus be paid without difficulty or ruin in respective proportion to the amount of property owned. The rich must realize that it is their duty to give a part of their surplus wealth for the benefit of the country as a whole, because the government guarantees inviolability of the remaining part of their property and the right of honest gain. I say honest because the control of property will prevent legal theft.

This social reform must come front above, for the time is ripe and it is becoming necessary as a guarantee of peace.

The tax on the poor is the seed of revolution, and it acts detrimentally to the government, which loses the great in its pursuit of the little. Moreover, the taxation of capital will lessen the increase of wealth in private hands, in which at present we have concentrated it as a counterweight to the governmental power of the Goys, namely, to the state treasury.

Progressive taxation, assessed according to the amount of capital, will produce a much greater revenue than the present system of taxing every one at an equal rate, which is useful to us now only as a means of exciting revolt and discontent among the Goys. The power of our sovereign will rest mainly in equilibrium and in guarantees of peace. For these, the capitalists must cede a part of their income so as to protect the action of the government machine. Public needs must be met by those who can best afford to do so and by those from whom there is something to take.

Such a measure will eliminate the hatred of the poor towards the rich, as they will be regarded as the financial supporters of the state and the upholders of peace and prosperity. The poor will also see that the rich are providing the necessary means to insure this end.

To prevent intelligent taxpayers from being too discontented with the new system of taxation, they will be furnished with detailed reports of the disbursement of public funds, exclusive of such as are appropriated for the needs of the throne and administrative institutions.

The sovereign will not own property, since everything in the state will seem to belong to him and these two conceptions would contradict each other. Private means would eliminate his right to own everything.

The relatives of the sovereign, aside from his descendants who will also be supported by the state, must join the ranks of government officials, or otherwise work for the right of holding property. The privilege of being of royal blood must not entitle them to rob the state treasury.

Sales, profits, or inheritances will be taxed by a progressive stamp tax. The transfer of property, whether in cash or otherwise, without the required stamp, will place the payment of the tax on the original owner, dating from the time of the transfer until the time of the reported failure to record the transaction. Transfer vouchers must be shown weekly at the local branch of the state treasury, together with a statement of the names, surnames, and the permanent addresses both of the original and of the new owner. The recording of the names of those participating in a transaction will be necessary in all transactions involving more than a certain amount for ordinary expenditure. The sale of prime necessities will be taxed only by a stamp tax, which will represent a certain small per cent of the cost of the particular article.

Just calculate how many times the amount received from such taxes will exceed the income of the Goy governments.

The state bank must keep a definite reserve fund, and all sums in excess must be put back into circulation. The cost of public works will be met out of this surplus fund. The initiative of such works emanating from the government will also tie the working class to the interests of the government and the rulers. Some of this money will be allotted to prizes for inventions and for the purposes of production.

Even small sums in excess of a certain definite and broadly calculated fund, should not be allowed to be kept in the state treasury, because money is intended to circulate, and every impediment to circulation is detrimental to the governmental mechanism, which the money lubricates; the congestion of lubricating substances can stop the proper functioning of the mechanism.

The substitution of bonds for a part of the currency has created just such an impediment. The result of this has already become sufficiently evident.

We will also establish an auditing office, so as to enable the sovereign to find at all times a full account of state revenues and expenses, except for the current month not yet made up, and that of the previous month not yet presented.

The only person who will not be interested in robbing the state treasury will be the sovereign, its owner. This is the reason why his control will prevent the possibility of loss or misappropriation.

Receptions for the purpose of etiquette, which waste the valuable time of the sovereign, will be abolished, because the ruler needs time for control and thought. Then his power will not be frittered away on the people surrounding the throne for the sake of appearance and brilliance, and who have only their own and not the public interest in mind.

The economic crises were created by us for the Goys only by the withdrawal of money from circulation. Huge amounts of capital were kept idle and were taken away from the nations, which were thus compelled to apply to us for loans. Payment of interest on these loans burdened the state finances and made the states subservient to capital. The concentration of industry having taken production out of the hands of the artisan and put it into the hands of capitalists, sucked all the power out of the people and also out of the state.

The present issue of money generally does not coincide with the need per capita, and consequently it cannot satisfy all the needs of the working classes. The issue of currency must correspond with the increase in population, and children must be reckoned as consumers from the day of their birth. The revision of the issue of currency is an essential problem for the whole world.

You know that gold currency was detrimental to the governments that accepted it, for it could not satisfy the requirements for money, since we took as much gold as possible out of circulation.

We must issue a currency based on the value of the working power, whether it be of paper or wood. We will issue money in proportion to the normal demands of every subject, adding a certain amount at every birth and decreasing it with every death.

Every department (the French administrative divisions), [Footnote: The words in parentheses would seem to be a comment of Nilus's.] every district, will be in charge of its own accounts.

To avoid any delay in paying government expenses, the terms of such payments will be decreed by order of the sovereign; this will eliminate any favoritism of the ministry (of finance) [Footnote: The words in parentheses are inserted by the editors.] over any other department to the detriment of the others.

The budget of revenues and the budget of expenditure will be placed side by side, in order that they may always be compared with each other

We will present plans for the reform of the Goy financial institutions and of their principles, as planned by us, in such a manner that nobody will be frightened. We will demonstrate the need of reform by the disorderly twaddle produced by the financial disorganization of the Goys. We will show that the first reason for this confusion lies in the drafting of rough estimates for the budget, which increases from year to year. This annual budget is with great difficulty made to last during the first half of the year; then a revised budget is demanded and the funds thus allotted are spent in the next three months, after which a supplementary budget is called for and all this is wound up by a liquidation budget. As the budget of the following year is based on the total expenditure of the preceding year, the divergence from the normal reaches fifty per cent annually, so that the annual budget trebles every ten years. Owing to such a procedure, resulting from the carelessness of the Goy governments, their treasuries became empty. The period of loans followed and used up the remainder and brought all the Goy states to bankruptcy.

You can well understand that such a management of financial affairs as we induced the Goys to pursue cannot be adopted by us.

Every loan proves the impotency of the government and its failure to understand its own rights. Loans, like the sword of Damocles, hang above the heads of the rulers, who instead of placing temporary taxes on their subjects, stretch forth their hands and beg the charity of our bankers. Foreign loans are leeches, which can never be removed from the governmental body until they either fall off themselves or the government itself manages to get rid of them. But the Goy governments instead of throwing them off increase their number, so that these governments must inevitably perish through self-inflicted loss of blood.

Indeed, what is a loan, especially a foreign loan, if not a leech? A loan is the issuance of government obligations which involve the liability to pay interest in proportion to the sum borrowed. If the loan pays five per cent, then in twenty years the government has unnecessarily paid in interest an amount equal to the principal sum borrowed. In forty years it has paid twice; in sixty years it has trebled the sum, while the loan still remains an unpaid debt.

From this calculation it is evident that under the system of universal taxation the government takes the last penny from the poor taxpayers in the form of taxes in order to pay interest to foreign capitalists, from whom the money was borrowed, instead of collecting these same pennies for its needs free from all interest.

So long as the loans were domestic, the Goys only shifted the money from the pockets of the poor into those of the rich; but when we bribed the proper persons to make the loans foreign, then national riches poured into our hands and all the Goys began to pay us the tribute of subjects.

The carelessness of the reigning Goys in statemanship, the corruption of their ministers, the ignorance of other officials of financial problems, has forced their countries into debt to our banks to such an extent that they can never pay off their debts. It should be realized, however, that we have gone to great pains in order to bring about such a state of affairs.

Impediments to the circulation of money will not be allowed by us, and therefore there will be no government bonds, except one per cent bonds, so that the payment of interest should not deliver the power of the state to the sucking of leeches. The right of issuing bonds will be exclusively granted to industrial corporations, which will easily pay the interest out of their profits. The government, however, does not derive profit on borrowed money as these corporations do, since the state borrows money for expenditure and not for production.

Industrial bonds will also be bought by the government, which instead of being, as at present, the payer of tribute on loans, will become a sound creditor. Such a measure will prevent stagnation in the circulation of money, as well as indolence and laziness, which were useful to us so long as the Goys remained independent, but are not wanted by us in our government.

How apparent is the shortsightedness of the purely bestial brains of the Goys! It manifested itself when they borrowed money for at interest. It did not occur to the Goys that, at any rate, this money, with the additional interest on it, would have to be taken from the resources of the country and paid to us. Would it not have been more simple to take the needed money from their own people?

This proves the genius of our distinguished mind, for we were able to present the question of loans to them in such a light that they saw in loans an advantage for themselves.

Our estimates, which we will produce when the time comes, will be based on the experience of centuries, on all those experiments which were conducted by us at the expense of the Goy governments; our estimates will prove to be clear and definite, and will obviously demonstrate the advantage of our new system. They will end all those abuses which made it possible for us to master the Goys, but which cannot be permitted in our reign.

We will so organize the accounting system that neither the sovereign himself nor the most humble clerk will be able to deflect the smallest sum from its destination or direct it into a different channel from that indicated in our original financial plan.

It is impossible to govern without a definite plan. Traveling along a definite road with an indefinite supply of provisions destroys heroes and knights.

The Goy rulers, to whom we once gave advice to neglect governmental duties for grandiose receptions, etiquette, and pleasures, only concealed our rule. The accounts of the powerful favorites who replaced the sovereign were drawn up by our agents, and they always satisfied the shallow minds by promises that in the future there would be savings and improvements. Savings from what? From new taxes? This might have been asked but was not asked by those who read our reports and plans. You know to what their carelessness has led them, what financial disorganization they have reached in spite of the wonderful diligence of their people."

I tend to follow the advice of our Founding Fathers and maintain a distrust of government and those in it, especially career politicians. There are no good candidates in this election who have any chance at winning. Of the bad candidates, Ron Paul is perhaps the best. If he were to win, it would send a signal to the American People that we can change things. Unfortunately, that change is a trap meant to favor the gold merchants and the bankers.

The only way to save the American People from another depression is to educate them as to how they are being set up by friendly foes. The People must have power.

The leaders the Jewish media and Jewish bankers offer us do not work in our interests, but we can insist that the policies they institute work in our favor. So don't childishly cling to Ron Paul as if he is our savior and our fate depends upon him. Also do not flippantly dismiss his candidacy.

We, the American People, can use him just as easily as he intends to use us. What we need to do is impeach Bush and Cheney and then elect an alternative presidential candidate who at least pretends to be outside of the mainstream. Then we need to remain vigilant and insist that our interests are served, not the interests of the Jewish bankers and war profiteers.