Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

Police chief: All guns will be banned within a generation.

CA- San Diego Police Chief, William Lansdowne said in an interview that the implementation of new gun laws will take guns off the streets of America within a generation.

According to San Diego 6, Lansdowne said that it may take a generation but guns will eventually be taken off the streets through new laws like Senator Dianne Feinstein’s proposed assault weapons ban:

“Chief Lansdowne, who plays an active role in the western region of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) association, said it may take a generation but guns will eventually be taken off the streets through new laws like Senator Diane Feinstein’s proposed assault weapons ban legislation. Some of the items his organization is addressing include; a ban on assault weapons, restricting high-capacity magazines, closing loopholes that allow firearm sales between private owners without background checks, and implementing much stricter background checks by using a comprehensive database.”

Lansdowne called for tougher gun laws in an interview with KPBS, and praised President Obama for his initiative on gun control.

“I could not be more supportive of the president for taking the position he has,” he said.

“I think it’s courageous with the politics involved in this process. But I think it’s goin to eventually make the country safer and certainly safer for my officers that have to respond to these calls.”

Lansdowne believes that the shooting in Newtown, Connecticut weakened the gun lobby’s power and has opened the door for new gun control legislation.

“We broke the NRA,” Lansdowne said off-camera.

Lansdowne’s position on gun control appears to be in the minority among sheriffs across the nation, however.

As CNSNews.com previously reported, sheriffs from Florida to California have stated publicly that they will not comply with any new gun control measures proposed by the federal government.

A recent poll conducted by the National Association of Chiefs of Police indicated that almost 64 percent of police commanders and sheriffs favor a law allowing private citizens to carry concealed firearms for protection. Almost 73 percent said that citizens should not be restricted from purchasing more than one weapon, and 96 percent say they believe criminals obtain firearms from illegal sources.

Unfortunately most states – especially those called Blue States due to their Liberal-leanings – continue to prohibit private citizens from carrying concealed handguns.

At the same time, there are outspoken opponents of gun ownership, such as Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Diane Feinstein (D-CA), who are carrying concealed weapons, according to WABC Radio’s Mark Levin. Levin, a recognized constitutional expert, heads the Landmark Legal Foundation. The LLF’s goal is to protect American’s from unreasonable and illegal government intrusions and violations of the US Constitution, including the Second Amendment.

The mainstream news media have been aware that several antigun proponents are carrying concealed firearms but have failed to expose this hypocrisy. This writer’s efforts to discover how many other anti-gunners are also packing heat – a right they wish to deny other citizens – met with limited results.

Not only does Schumer carry a handgun, the New York City Police Department also provides armed escorts for the good senator. In fact, the Government Accounting Office — the investigative arm of the US Congress — slammed Schumer’s use of police resources for personal protection. It’s clear that Schumer believes he’s special. He wishes to ban private citizens’ ownership of firearms, while he enjoys layers of protection.

“No wonder Chuckie Schumer shoots his mouth off so much – he’s able to protect himself,” says a 25-year police veteran.

Also, a check of Pistol License records shows that Senator Schumer possesses an “unrestricted” pistol permit, a rarity in New York City. Licenses are distributed in different categories in the Big Apple: Target Permits allow only use of a firearm at a licensed firing range; Premises Permits allow weapons to be kept in a home or apartment; Restricted Permits allow the gunowner to carry their firearms concealed but only within the purview of their job (security, jewelers, armored car guards, etc.). So it’s evident that Senator Schumer has two sets of rules — one for Americans and one for himself.

And then we have Senator Diane Feinstein on the Left Coast who possesses something more rare than a conservative Republican in San Francisco – an unrestricted concealed weapons permit. Apparently without shame, she participated in a citywide gun turn-in program that was intended to create some kind of statue from the donated guns that were to be melted down. One of her police body guards let it slip that she contributed a cheap model for the meltdown, while retaining her .357 magnum revolver for her own personal self-defense.

Hypocrisy is not limited to politicians when it comes to the Second Amendment. For Example, well-known Washington-based columnist, Carl Rowan, often wrote about the ills of firearms ownership. Until, that is, he shot and wounded a teenager who trespassed on his property. The white teenaged boy claimed he wanted to try Rowan’s swimming pool. Rowan, an African-American, retaliated with deadly force using a firearm. That’s when the news came out that Carl Rowan, gun-control advocate, actually possessed a license to own firearms.

Another example is the loudmouth entertainer, Rosie O’Donnell, who once ran roughshod over conservative actor Tom Selleck because of his stance supporting the Second Amendment. Although Ms. O’Donnell doesn’t carry a gun, she has three armed bodyguards who protect her, her wife and her children, something the vast majority of hardworking Americans could never afford. Isn’t it comforting to know all these Liberals are looking out for us?

We tried. They stuff the ballot here in San Diego. I recorded video of the last election cycle where supposedly sealed ballot boxes come in with all of the seals broken. ALL of them, not just a few. This is an ongoing problem San Diego has had reaching back through at least 2004. I’m not the first to call issue to this. You can’t vote these people out anymore.

I read your recent statements about guns being “off-the-streets” within a generation….besides being a violation of your oath of office, and an idiotic statement…I just wanted you to know that I think you should be fired…and then charged with dereliction of your duties..and treason….and when convicted…you should be hung by the neck until dead, and let your rotting traitorous ass hang there long enough for the birds to pick your corpse clean….I cannot believe the poor people of San Diego have to tolerate both your idiocy, and your lack of understanding regarding the 2nd Amendment and our natural rights…but like I said….I’m all for law and order..so I hope the people of SD impeach / fire/ charge and convict you…I’d come to the hanging…btw…if you think the people of this country are going to allow the gangsters (police) for the Bankster/Gangster/s to simply come in and take our rights, or our ability to fight for our rights…you are insane…but then again, I grew up in a family of corrupt cops just like the SDPD….so nothing involving corruption and the police shocks me…good luck being the first in the door on those planned gun raids ..Ha!

Regards,

RJ O’Guillory
Author-
Webster Groves-The Life of an Insane Family
————————————————-
I’ll let you know if I get a response…..RJ

That is possible because the next generation is completely brainwashed.

As Machiavelli said, “If you can’t win, you don’t fight”, and the powers that be may have realized that they’re a lot closer to facing the Guillotine than they previously thought. I always suspected that we may reach a point where they’ll be forced to turn down the heat and “boil the frog” a bit more slowly.

That they were planning their attack is a certainty, but they may have decided to retreat after reassessing their opposition.

They, the Internatioanl Banksters know, if ANY of those 3 clocks reach critical mass BEFORE they disarm America, then their chances of doing so, go to zero, hence they MUST disarm America BEFORE any of those clocks go off.

Problems: The Banksters problem is NOT collapsing the global financial/banking system,.. the real problem they now face, is keeping it from collapsing until they want it to.

The Mid/Far-East now has several wars ready to break out, and Syria is ALREADY in a state of kinetic action (open combat), that is rapidly expanding.

People are waking up at an escalalting rate, hence why the gov’t (on behalf of their paymasters) is trying to take control of the internet. Never before have so many people had so much access to so much information, instantly.

Also, given that they have used these templates of sovereignty destuction thru out the 19 and 20th century, especially in the 20th century,.. we Americans have the gift of hindsight to seek out and understand the milemakers of tyranny, and know where all this is leading.

They simply don’t have the time to do this by the usual, preferred method, which is incrementalism,… no!,.. they only have one option left to them,… go all in,… and make for the grab now,… while they still can.

I was thinking something similar, Czar, and was about to comment “Tell you what, “Chief”, YOU hand in YOUR weapons first and we’ll see how it goes…”. I always find it amusing to see dipshit police chiefs/commanders strutting around in their costumes with all the stars on their collars like they’re General Eisenhower or something…it probably won’t be long until one of these egomaniac numbnuts go for six stars, you know, to show that they’re a reeeaaal big-shot. lol

As for Chuck Schumer and Diane Feinstein, duplicitous treasonous scum like them need to be hung from tree limbs and used as human pinatas.