The "Protocols" have been accused of being a forgery, but the evidence of this is very weak. On top of that, it documents many of the geopolitical changes of the 20th century before they took place. If the "Protocols" are indeed a forgery, I wonder how they could possibly be so accurate?!?

Quote:

Originally Posted by albie

It documents things that already happened and were happening. Stuff that keeps on happening. ANYONE CAN DO THAT.

Many of the predictions were typical for the 20st century.

Quote:

Originally Posted by albie

They were originally written to attack Napoleon. Later they were adapted to attack the jews.

The "Protocols" were first published in 1907. It is claimed by those calling the "Protocols" a forgery that it was largely copied from a criticism of Napoleon, but the documents it supposebly copied is one of the rarest documents in existence (because they were destroyed for censorship purposes). This makes it pretty much impossible to verify such a claim.