[*] Number of Bankruptcy Filings by U.S. Retailers Spikes in 2016[*] Pres. Trump Picks Judge Neil Gorsuch for Supreme Court Post[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from Jan. 30 to Feb. 3, 2017

*********

23 FARMS: Wants to Use Regions Bank Cash Collateral Until Feb. 28-----------------------------------------------------------------23 Farms, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the NorthernDistrict of Florida for authorization to use cash collateralthrough Feb. 28, 2017.

The Debtor relates that it has a farming operation and grows several crops, including watermelons, tobacco and peanuts. TheDebtor further relates that it will be planting approximately 175acres of watermelons within the next few weeks. The Debtorcontends that it is imperative for it to obtain chemicals andfertilizer for the watermelon crop immediately in order to grow thewatermelons.

In addition to the watermelons, the Debtor estimates plantingapproximately 140 acres of tobacco, 200 – 250 acres of peanutsand some grass. The Debtor says that it will be using a watermelonbroker which will advance a portion of the anticipated cropproceeds in March and April. The Debtor further says that it hasalso obtained a source for chemicals and fertilizer, payment to bemade cash on delivery, or COD.

The Debtor's proposed Budget provides for total expenses in theamount of $252,181 for the period Jan. 25, 2017 to Feb. 28, 2017.

The Debtor owes Regions Bank approximately $3,031,699 as of thePetition Date. The debt is secured by equipment, crops, contractrights and approximately 743 acres of real property in GilchristCounty, Florida.

The Debtor tells the Court that it currently has $332,583 in bankaccounts. The Debtor further tells the Court that the source ofthese funds was crop insurance. The Debtor believes that all ofthis money is cash collateral in which Regions Bank holds aperfected security interest.

The Debtor will obtain crop insurance for the watermelons, althoughthe amount insured is limited to $125,000. The Debtor will obtaincrop insurance for the tobacco and peanut crops, which unlike thewatermelon insurance will cover the entire crop.

The Debtor proposes to pay Regions Bank $50,000 within three daysof the entry of an Order authorizing the use of cash collateral. The Debtor further proposes to grant Regions Bank a post-petitionreplacement lien to the extent of its prepetition lien on all ofits collateral, including equipment, receivables, proceeds frominsurance policies, contracts and crops. The Debtor asserts thatit will pay its entire net profit from its peanut crop of 2017,estimated to be $300,000 to Regions Bank. The Debtor furtherasserts that it will maintain insurance on all of the collateralheld by Regions Bank, with Regions Bank named as a loss payee.

23 Farms, LLC, a Newberry, Florida-based company with a farmingoperation, filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No.17-10015) on Jan. 20, 2017. The petition was signed by Joey D.Langford, II, managing member. The Debtor is represented by LisaCaryl Cohen, Esq., at Ruff & Cohen, P.A. The case is assigned toJudge Karen K. Specie. The Debtor estimated assets and liabilitiesat $1 million to $10 million at the time of the filing.

38 STUDIOS: Hilltop Securities Pays $16MM to Settle Claims----------------------------------------------------------Cara Mannion, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reports that HilltopSecurities Inc., f/k/a First Southwest Co. LLC said that it willshell out $16 million to Rhode Island Commerce Corp. to settleclaims related to a failed financing deal for the defunct 38Studios LLC.

Hilltop Securities disclosed the deal in a filing the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission.

38 Studios LLC, a video-game developer founded by former Boston RedSox pitcher Curt Schilling, filed for liquidation on June 8, 2012,without attempting to reorganize. Although based in Providence,Rhode Island, the company filed the Chapter 7 petition (Bankr. D.Del. Case No. 12-11743) in Delaware.

4 ACES BINGO: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee------------------------------------------------------The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Feb. 2, 2017, disclosed in acourt filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors hasbeen appointed in the Chapter 11 case of 4 Aces Bingo Inc.

About 4 Aces Bingo Inc

4 Aces Bingo Inc is a privately held company in Aurora, CO. It wasestablished in 1992. 4 Aces Bingo filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcypetition (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 16-22413) on Dec. 28, 2016. 4Aces Bingo is a Single Asset Real Estate debtor. The Hon.Elizabeth E. Brown oversees the case. Jeffrey S. Brinen, Esq., atKutner Brinen, P.C., serves as counsel to the Debtor. In itspetition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets;and liabilities between $500,000 and $1 million. The petition wassigned by William Weaver, president. The Debtor says it has nounsecured creditor.

The sale of the 2010 Ford F-250 Truck through Enterprise FleetManagement is free and clear of all liens, claims andencumbrances.

The Debtor has no liens against the 2010 Ford F-250 Truck, and theDebtor may use the net sales proceeds to assist it with itsreorganization efforts; any ad valorem tax liens of Nueces County,if any, attach to the proceeds of the sale.

About Advanced Solids Control

Advanced Solids Control, LLC, is an oilfield service companyspecializing in solids control for land-based oil and gas drillingoperations.

Advanced Solids sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Tex.CaseNo. 16-52748) on Dec. 2, 2016. The petition was signed by W. LynnFrazier, managing member. The Debtor estimated assets of lessthan$50,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million.

The Debtor tapped William R. Davis, Jr., Esq., at Langley &Banack,Inc. as counsel.

AEOLUS PHARMACEUTICALS: Amends 2016 Annual Report to Add Part III-----------------------------------------------------------------Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., filed an amendment to its annualreport on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 2016, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Dec. 20, 2016. The purpose of this Form 10-K/A is to submit Part III, Item 10through Item 14 information, previously intended to be incorporatedby reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement filedpursuant to Regulation 14C.

Mission Viejo, California-based Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., is aSouthern California-based biopharmaceutical company leveragingsignificant government investment to develop a platform of novelcompounds in oncology and biodefense. The platform consists ofover 200 compounds licensed from Duke University and NationalJewish Health.

The Company's lead compound, AEOL 10150, is being developed as amedical countermeasure ("MCM") against the pulmonary sub-syndromeof acute radiation syndrome ("Pulmonary Acute Radiation Syndrome"or "Lung-ARS") as well as the gastrointestinal sub-syndrome ofacute radiation syndrome ("GI-ARS"). Both syndromes are caused byacute exposure to high levels of radiation due to a radiologicalor nuclear event. It is also being developed for use as a MCM forexposure to chemical vesicants such as chlorine gas, sulfurmustard gas and nerve agents.

Aeolus reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of$6.04 million on $2.07 million of contract revenue for the fiscalyear ended Sept. 30, 2016, compared to a net loss attributable tocommon stockholders of $2.62 million on $3.11 million of contractrevenue for the fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 2015.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Aeolus Pharmaceuticals had $4.17 million intotal assets, $972,000 in total liabilities and $3.19 million intotal stockholders' equity.

ALLEN CONSTRUCTION: Unsecureds to Recoup 100% in 15 Years at 3.5%-----------------------------------------------------------------Allen Construction Services, Inc., filed with the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the Western District of Wisconsin a second amendeddisclosure statement dated Jan. 30, 2017, referring to the Debtor'sthird amended plan of reorganization.

The Third Amended Plan provides for treatment of the secured claimof the City of Madison Treasurer in the amount of $4,049.59 fordelinquent personal property taxes and the priority unsecured claimand administrative claim of the Department of Workforce Development- Worker's Compensation Division in the total aggregate amount of$94,220.12. These claims will be paid through the Chapter 11Plan.

To ensure feasibility of the Third Amended Plan, the treatment ofClass 5 claims of general unsecured creditors have been amended toprovide for an amortization of 15 years instead of 12 years. General unsecured claims -- which total approximately $1,146,661.95-- will continue to accrue interest at the fixed rate of 3.5% perannum.

General unsecured claims will be paid in quarterly payments of$24,594, with the first payment to be paid on the 15th day of themonth following the end of the first full quarter following theEffective Date of the Plan, and paid on the 15th day of the monthfollowing the end of each quarter thereafter. The claimants willshare pro rata in the quarterly distributions. The total amountbeing paid by the Debtor is $1,146,661.95.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 9, 2016, theDebtor filed a disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 plan,which proposed to pay in full holders of Class 6 generalnon-priority unsecured claims. These creditors would be paidwithin 12 years of confirmation of the plan in quarterlyinstallments at 3.5% interest.

About Allen Construction

Headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin, Allen Construction Services,Inc. dba Allen Kitchen and Bath was founded in 1980. Allen Kitchen& Bath provides home remodeling products and services and offersremodeling services, including planning, designing, productselection, installation and custom fabrication. It offersfull-line of granite, quartz and solid surface countertops. Itcurrently employs approximately 21 employees, who include the twoprincipals of the Debtor, Gary Allen and Laree Allen. The Debtoris a member of the National Association of the Remodeling Industry,the Madison Area Builders Association, and the National Associationof Home Builders.

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D.Wis. Case No. 15-10033) on Jan. 6, 2015, estimating its assets atbetween $100,000 and $500,000 and its liabilities between $1million and $10 million. The petition was signed by Gary E. Allen,president.

AMPLIPHI BIOSCIENCES: Empery Asset Owns 4.9% Stake as of Dec. 31----------------------------------------------------------------In an amended Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, Empery Asset Management, LP disclosed that as of Dec.31, 2016, it beneficially owns 1,494,334 shares of common stockissuable upon exercise of warrants, of AmpliPhi BiosciencesCorporation representing 4.99 percent of the shares outstanding.

Ryan M. Lane also reported 1,494,505 shares of common stockissuable upon exercise of warrants while Martin D. Hoe reportedbeneficial ownership of 1,494,505 shares of common stock issuableupon exercise of warrants.

Pursuant to the terms of the Reported Warrants, the ReportingPersons cannot exercise any of the Reported Warrants to the extentthey would beneficially own, after any such exercise, more than4.99% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. Consequently, asof Dec. 31, 2016, the Reporting Persons were not able to exerciseall of the Reported Warrants due to the Blockers.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

https://is.gd/KnecaL

About AmpliPhi

AmpliPhi Biosciences Corp. is a biotechnology company focused onthe discovery, development and commercialization of novel phagetherapeutics. Its principal offices occupy approximately 1,000square feet of leased office space pursuant to a month-to-monthsublease, located at 3579 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 100, SanDiego, California. It also leases approximately 700 square feet oflab space in Richmond, Virginia, approximately 5,000 square feet oflab space in Brookvale, Australia, and approximately 6,000 squarefeet of lab and office space in Ljubljana, Slovenia.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had $26.03 million in totalassets, $7.80 million in total liabilities and $18.22 million intotal stockholders' equity.

Ampliphi reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of$10.79 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to netincome attributable to common stockholders of $21.82 million.

"[T]he Company has incurred net losses since its inception, hasnegative operating cash flows and has an accumulated deficit of$371.9 million as of September 30, 2016, $56.4 million of whichhas been accumulated since January of 2011, when the Company beganits focus on bacteriophage development. As of September 30, 2016,the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $4.0 million.Management believes that the Company's existing resources will besufficient to fund the Company's planned operations through the endof 2016. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about theCompany's ability to continue as a going concern," as disclosed inthe Company's quarterly report for the period ended Sept. 30, 2016.

AMPLIPHI BIOSCIENCES: Hudson Bay Reports 6.9% Stake as of Dec. 31-----------------------------------------------------------------In a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, Hudson Bay Capital Management, L.P. and Sander Gerberdisclosed that as of Dec. 31, 2016, they beneficially own 1,241,489shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants ofAmpliphi Biosciences Corporation representing 6.9 percent of theshares outstanding.

The percentage was calculated based upon an aggregate of 16,742,040shares of Common Stock, which are reported to be issued andoutstanding in the Company's Prospectus filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4) on Nov. 17,2016.

Mr. Gerber serves as the managing member of Hudson Bay Capital GPLLC, which is the general partner of the Investment Manager.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

https://is.gd/iax0Da

About AmpliPhi

AmpliPhi Biosciences Corp. is a biotechnology company focused onthe discovery, development and commercialization of novel phagetherapeutics. Its principal offices occupy approximately 1,000square feet of leased office space pursuant to a month-to-monthsublease, located at 3579 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 100, SanDiego, California. It also leases approximately 700 square feet oflab space in Richmond, Virginia, approximately 5,000 square feet oflab space in Brookvale, Australia, and approximately 6,000 squarefeet of lab and office space in Ljubljana, Slovenia.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, the Company had $26.03 million in totalassets, $7.80 million in total liabilities and $18.22 million intotal stockholders' equity.

Ampliphi reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of$10.79 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to netincome attributable to common stockholders of $21.82 million.

"[T]he Company has incurred net losses since its inception, hasnegative operating cash flows and has an accumulated deficit of$371.9 million as of September 30, 2016, $56.4 million of whichhas been accumulated since January of 2011, when the Company beganits focus on bacteriophage development. As of September 30, 2016,the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $4.0 million.Management believes that the Company's existing resources will besufficient to fund the Company's planned operations through the endof 2016. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about theCompany's ability to continue as a going concern," as disclosed inthe Company's quarterly report for the period ended Sept. 30, 2016.

The affirmation of the Caa3 rating reflects the continuedlikelihood of default within the next year and the ongoingpossibility of significant bondholder impairment despite thepassage of "rescue legislation." The affirmation also incorporatesthe recent takeover by the State of New Jersey (A2 negative). TheCaa3 rating indicates an expected loss to bondholders of up to 35%of principal, in light of the city's very large structural deficitwith limited sources of relief without state assistance.

Rating Outlook

The negative outlook reflects ongoing risks from the absence of adetailed plan and time frame to restore the city's financialhealth. While the city and state are now collaborating torenegotiate various liabilities, the city faces an ongoingliquidity crisis, structural deficit and near-term serviceinsolvency.

Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Elimination or reduction of structural deficit

Improved liquidity and reserve position

Successful renegotiations of existing contracts leading to reducedexpenditures

Material improvement in tax base and socioeconomic profile

Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade

Failure to adopt adequate budget solutions

Indication that, in the event of a default, bondholder recoverieswould fall below 80%

Default on debt obligations

Legal Security

Debt service on the bonds is secured by the city's generalobligation unlimited ad valorem tax pledge. Certain issuances areadditionally secured by bond insurance.

Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Obligor Profile

Atlantic City is a tourism and gaming center located along thesouth New Jersey shore. It has a population of approximately39,000.

Methodology

The principal methodology used in this rating was US LocalGovernment General Obligation Debt published in December 2016.

Regulatory Disclosures

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures inrelation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note ofthe same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a programfor which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratingsin accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued ona support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatorydisclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the supportprovider and in relation to each particular credit rating actionfor securities that derive their credit ratings from the supportprovider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, thisannouncement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation tothe provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitiverating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of thedebt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms havenot changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in amanner that would have affected the rating.

ATOKA COUNTY HEALTH: Objections to Chapter 9 Petition Due March 9-----------------------------------------------------------------Objections to the Chapter 9 petition of Atoka County HealthAuthority must be filed on or before March 9, 2017, with the Clerk,U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, P.O.Box 1347, Okmulgee, Oklahoma 74447. A copy of the objections willbe mailed to the attorney for the Debtor:

BENJAMIN EYE CARE: Can Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis-----------------------------------------------------------Judge Pamela S. Hollis of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theNorthern District of Illinois authorized Benjamin Eye Care, LLC touse cash collateral on an interim basis until February 16, 2017.

Judge Hollis acknowledged that an immediate need exists for theDebtor to use its pre-petition collateral in order to continue itsbusiness operation since the Debtor was unable to obtain credit onfavorable terms.

The Debtor acknowledged that the following entities have validliens upon its assets and its cash proceeds:

(a) Inland Bank & Trust, which was owed approximately$299,000, secured by all the assets of the Debtor; and

(b) The Northern Trust Company, which was owed approximately$567,467, secured by all the assets of the Debtor.

Inland Bank and Northern Trust will be secured by a lien to thesame extent, priority and validity as existed prior to the PetitionDate. Inland Bank and Northern Trust will also receive a securityinterest in and replacement lien upon all of the Debtor's property,real or personal, whether in existence before or after the PetitionDate, to the extent actually used and for the diminution in thevalue of Inland Bank and Northern Trust's collateral securing theDebtor's indebtedness.

The Debtor was directed to continue making payments to Inland Bankin the previously agreed amount of $1,250 per month, to maintaininsurance covering the full value of all collateral, and to permitonsite inspection of such collateral, policies of insurance andfinancial statements.

A final hearing on the Debtor's use of cash collateral is scheduledon February 16, 2017 at 10:30 a.m.

Benjamin Eye Care, LLC filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 16-36409) onNovember 15, 2016. The petition was signed by Dr. Mark Benjamin,owner. At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated assets at $0 to$50,000 and liabilities at $500,000 to $1 million.

BRUCE FINDER: Can Use Fifth Third Bank Cash Until February 17-------------------------------------------------------------Judge Deborah L. Thorne of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theNorthern District of Illinois authorized Bruce Finder Sales, Inc.to use Fifth Third Bank's cash collateral on an interim basis untilFeb. 17, 2017.

The approved one-month Budget provided for total expenses in theamount of $251,404.

The Debtor is indebted to Fifth Third Bank pursuant to certain loanagreements. Fifth Third Bank has a perfected first prioritysecurity interest in all the Debtor's assets and property,currently-owned and later-acquired, as well as security interestsin their proceeds.

Pursuant to the Interim Order, Fifth Third Bank is granted valid,binding, enforceable and perfected liens and security interests inand on any of the Debtor's currently-owned collateral or collateralacquired since the Petition Date, to the same extent, validity andpriority held by Fifth Third Bank prior to the petition date.

The Debtor was directed to pay Fifth Third bank $2,736 by January30, 2017, as adequate protection. The Debtor was further directedto maintain insurance coverage on the collateral.

A status hearing on the Debtor's right to use cash collateral isscheduled on Feb. 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

Bruce Finder Sales, Inc., d/b/a BFS Metals, d/b/a Chicago PlasticSupply, based in Cicero, Illinois, filed a chapter 11 petition(Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 17-02122) on Jan. 25, 2017. Thepetition was signed by Bradley Finder, president. The Debtor isrepresented by Allan O. Fridman, Esq., at the Law Office of O.Allan Fridman. The case is assigned to Judge Deborah L. Thorne. The Debtor disclosed total assets at $1.10 million and totalliabilities at $1.18 as of Dec. 31, 2016.

BURGI ENGINEERS: March 9 Disclosure Statement Hearing-----------------------------------------------------Judge Ralph B. Kirscher of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Montana will convene a hearing on March 9, 2017, at9:00 a.m., to consider approval of the disclosure statementdescribing the plan of reorganization filed by Burgi Engineers LLCon Jan. 24, 2017.

March 6, 2017, is fixed as the last day for filing and servingwritten objections to the disclosure statement.

Mr. Burland East owns 100% of Soledad. Mr. Ernest Rady owns 100%of AAIM. AAIM and Soledad together own 100% of AACA. AACA is aSEC registered investment adviser. With the exception of 22,500shares owned individually by Mr. Burland East, the shares of Cadiz,Inc. covered by this report are held for the benefit ofdiscretionary accounts advised and/or sub-advisedby AACA. AACA serves as the sub-adviser to a fund advised byAltegris, an unaffiliated SEC registered investment adviser.

The ownership breakdown of the common stock of Cadiz, Inc. is asfollows: AAIM, Soledad, Burland East and Ernest Rady are controlpersons of AACA and therefore have indirect shared investment powerand indirect shared voting power of 889,797 shares.

Mr. Burland East also has direct investment power and sole votingpower of 22,500 shares. AACA does not have any investment poweror voting power over these shares. AACA has investment power andvoting power over accounts that hold in the aggregate 889,797shares.

No one account owns 5% or more of the shares. Altegris serves asthe investment adviser for, and has discretionary authority overAACA Opportunistic Real Estate Long Fund, which owns854,060 shares (4.32%). Altegris has no voting power over theshares in the Fund. AACA is the sub-adviser to the Fund and hasvoting power and shared investment power over the shares in theFund.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

https://is.gd/gJO4AA

About Cadiz

Cadiz Inc. is a land and water resource development company with45,000 acres of land in three areas of eastern San BernardinoCounty, California. Virtually all of this land is underlain byhigh-quality, naturally recharging groundwater resources, and issituated in proximity to the Colorado River and the Colorado RiverAqueduct, a major source of imported water for Southern California. The Company's properties are suitable for various uses, includinglarge-scale agricultural development, groundwater storage and watersupply projects. The Company's main objective is to realize thehighest and best use of its land and water resources in anenvironmentally responsible way.

Cadiz Inc. reported a net loss and comprehensive loss of $24.01million in 2015, a net loss and comprehensive loss of $18.88million in 2014 and a net loss and comprehensive loss of $22.67million in 2013.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Cadiz Inc. had $59.01 million in totalassets, $129.24 million in total liabilities and a totalstockholders' deficit of $70.22 million.

CANNELLE PATISSERIE: Submits Cash Collateral Stipulation--------------------------------------------------------Cannelle Patisserie, Inc., submitted to the U.S. Bankruptcy Courtfor the Southern District of New York, its stipulation with theInternal Revenue Service regarding the use of cash collateral.

The Debtor is indebted to the IRS for outstanding federal incometaxes, federal withholding and Federal Insurance Contributions Act(FICA) taxes, and federal unemployment taxes which were due butunpaid. The IRS asserted that it holds a lien on all assets of theDebtor to secure tax liabilities in the approximate amount of$447,795.59.

The IRS' cash collateral consists of proceeds of the Debtor'soperations and collections of accounts receivable.

The Stipulation provides, among others, the following relevantterms:

(1) Use of Cash Collateral: The IRS consents to the use ofcash collateral by the Debtor: (i) in the ordinary course ofbusiness for payment of expenses incurred, or to be incurred in theoperation of its business, (ii) for payment of any filing fees orUnited States Trustee fees in connection with the Proceedings, and(iii) for payment of any professional fees and expenses, to theextent allowed in the Proceedings.

(2) Use of Collateral: The IRS consents to the use ofcollateral such as other real and personal property in which theIRS holds a secured interest.

(3) Adequate Protection Liens: As adequate protection tosecure ahy loss, decrease or decline in the value of the collateralresulting from the use, sale or lease of the collateral by theDebtor, the Debtor hereby grants to the IRS a continuingpost-petition security interest in all of the assets of the Debtorand all substitutions therefore which are created, acquired and inwhich the Debtor obtains an interest subsequent to the filing ofthe petition, provided that such lien does not extend to any causesof action under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code or theirrecoveries. The parties agree to a carve out from the AdequateProtection Lien to the extent of $15,000 for the fees and expensesof a chapter 7 trustee in the event the case is converted to aChapter 7 case.

(4) Adequate Protection Payments: As additional adequateprotection for any Post-Petition Loss, the Debtor will make amonthly payment of $7,000 to the IRS, for the earlier of (i) 5years, (ii) until a Chapter 11 Plan in confirmed by the Court, or(iii) the case is closed. The payments will be applied to thefederal tax liabilities secured by the IRS Lien.

(5) Insurance: The Debtor agrees to maintain all insurancepolicies including general commercial liability insurace, fire,hazard, casualty and Workmen's Compensation.

(6) Tax Payments: The Debtor will make timely weekly payrolltax deposits, beginning immediately, for weekly payroll taxes duefor withheld federal income tax, social security tax, and Medicaretaxes by either electronic transfer or transfer via Federal TaxDeposit form 8109B made out to the Debtor's local FinancialInstitution. The Debtor will make timely payroll tax deposits whendue for the Federal Unemployment Tax, by either electronic transferor transfer via Federal Tax Deposit form 8109B made out to theDebtor's local Financial Institution.

The hearing on the stipulation is scheduled on March 2, 2017 at12:00 noon.

Cannelle Patisserie Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition(Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-44577) on October 11, 2016. Thepetition was signed by Jean-Claude Perrenau, president. The Debtoris represented by Daniel C Marotta, Esq. and Richard M. Gabor,Esq., at Gabor & Marotta LLC. The Debtor estimated assets at$50,001 to $100,000 and liabilities at $500,001 to $1 million atthe time of the filing.

CHIEFTAIN STEEL: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral Until March 1-----------------------------------------------------------------Judge Joan A. Lloyd of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the WesternDistrict of Kentucky authorized Chieftain Steel, LLC and FloydIndustries, LLC to use cash collateral until March 1, 2017.

United Cumberland Bank consented to the Debtors' use of cashcollateral. Axis Capital, Inc. also consented to Floyd Industries'use of cash collateral.

United Cumberland Bank had security interests and liens on, amongother things, all of the Debtors' accounts receivable, inventory,equipment, chattel paper, general intangibles and real estate.

The Debtors are indebted to United Cumberland Bank pursuant tothree loans:

The Debtors were authorized to use cash collateral solely to paynormal trade payables, payroll, insurance premiums, taxes andutilities, necessary to preserve and maintain the assets andbusiness operations of the Debtors during the period of December31, 2016 through March 1, 2017.

The Debtors were directed to make monthly interest-only payments toUnited Cumberland Bank in the amount of $9,250 for Loans #75110 and#75441, principal payments of $3,500 per month under Loan #755803.

The Debtors were also directed to maintain a collateral baseconsisting of cash collateral in an amount not less than $750,000.

United Cumberland Bank was granted first priority post-petitionreplacement security interests and liens upon all of the Debtor'spost-petition property that is similar to the property on which itheld its prepetition liens, including, without limitation, allpost-petition property of the types constituting the collateral oftheir prepetition liens, and all their proceeds and products.

United Cumberland Bank was also granted an administrative expenseclaim which will have priority over any and all administrativeexpenses, subject to the Carve-Out.

The Carve-Out consists of fees, costs, disbursements, charges, andexpenses of attorneys, accountants and other professionals of theDebtor retained in the Chapter 11 case.

The Debtors' authorization to use cash collateral will terminate:

(1) in the event that the Debtors will fail to make anypayment to United Cumberland required under the Second AmendedFinal Order; or

(2) in the event that the Debtors will breach any non-paymentterm, condition or covenant set forth in the Second Amended FinalOrder; or

(3) upon the entry of a final order dismissing the Chapter 11Case, appointing a trustee in the Chapter 11 Case, converting theChapter 11 Case to a case under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code ortransfer of venue of the Chapter 11 Case to another district.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet beenappointed in the Chapter 11 case of Floyd Industries LLC, anaffiliate of Chieftain Steel LLC, as of Nov. 25, 2016, according tothe court docket.

CIRCLE RESTAURANT: Unsecureds to Start Getting Payments on May 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------Unsecured creditors of Circle Restaurant Group Kansas, LLC, willreceive payments from the company starting May 1, according to thecompany's latest Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

Under the latest restructuring plan, Class 3 unsecured claimsallowed by the court will be paid $300 a month, pro rata, for 60months for a total of $18,000. This payment will result in adividend of roughly 15% to unsecured creditors.

Meanwhile, Ernesto Peralta, a member of the company, will retainhis ownership and will be the sole surviving member. Any loan withequity security holders will not be paid and will be eliminatedupon confirmation of the plan, according to the company's latestdisclosure statement filed on Jan. 26 with the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the District of Kansas.

A copy of the first amended disclosure statement is available forfree at:

https://is.gd/cbW8TQ

About Circle Restaurant Group

Circle Restaurant Group, LLC, a Kansas-based limited liabilitycompany, has been operating a restaurant since 2012.

COMSTOCK RESOURCES: MacKay Shields Has 18.7% Stake as of Sept. 30-----------------------------------------------------------------MacKay Shields LLC, an investment adviser registered under Section203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, disclosed in an amendedSchedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission thatit is deemed to be the beneficial owner of 9,407,721 shares ofcommon stock, par value $0.50 per share, of Comstock ResourcesInc., or 18.73% based on a total of 13,148,000 shares of CommonStock issued and outstanding as of Sept. 30, 2016, plus 35,753,172shares issuable upon conversion of convertible notes held by MacKayShields' clients. A full-text copy of the regulatory filing isavailable for free at:

https://is.gd/nfGCom

About Comstock Resources

Comstock Resources, Inc. is an independent energy company based inFrisco, Texas and is engaged in oil and gas acquisitions,exploration and development primarily in Texas and Louisiana. TheCompany's stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under thesymbol CRK.

The Company reported a net loss of $1.04 billion for the year endedDec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss of $57.11 million for theyear ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Comstock had $885.5 million in total assets,$1.10 billion in total liabilities and a total stockholders'deficit of $220 million.

* * *

As reported by the TCR on Sept. 23, 2016, S&P Global Ratings raisedits corporate credit rating on Comstock Resources Inc. to 'CCC+'from 'SD' (selective default). The outlook is negative. "Therating actions on Comstock are in conjunction with theSept. 6, 2016, close of their comprehensive debt exchange and ourassessment of the company's revised capital structure and creditprofile," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Aaron McLean.

CRYSTAL WATERFALLS: Cash Collateral Motion Vacated--------------------------------------------------Judge Ernest Robles of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the CentralDistrict of California vacated Crystal Waterfalls, LLC's CashCollateral Motion and rendered moot the Existing Cash-managementMotion in light of the successful close of escrow.

At the Motions' hearings, the Debtor represented to the Court thatthe close of escrow had successfully occurred, pursuant to apreviously Court-approved sale order. Therefore, the Debtor nolonger has an ownership interest in the real property located at1211 E. Garvey Street, Covina, CA, known as Park Inn by Radisson,and the Property is no longer part of the bankruptcy estate.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated January 26, 2017, is availableat https://is.gd/THtdIr

About Crystal Waterfalls

Crystal Waterfalls LLC owns real property in Covina, California, onwhich it currently operates a hotel known as the Park Inn byRadisson. Situated in the heart of Southern California, the Hotelis just east of downtown Los Angeles at the base of the San GabrielMountains, and a short distance from West Covina, San Dimas,Irwindale, City of Industry, Pomona, and Ontario, and many majorattractions (such as amusement parks, the Pomona Fairplex, andIrwindale Speedway). The Hotel includes 258 rooms (50 of whichrequire certain forms of rehabilitation and currently are not inuse), and has a fitness center, an outdoor heated swimming pool andwhirlpool, and 9,000 square feet of meeting space.

Crystal Waterfalls currently has two members: (1) Lucy Gao, whoserves as the Debtor's managing member; and (2) Golden BayInvestments LLC, a California limited liability company ("GoldenBay"). Ms. Gao is the sole and managing member of Golden Bay.

The Debtor disclosed $52.5 million in assets and $71.4 million inliabilities in its schedules. The schedules say that the Covina,California hotel property is worth $52 million.

The Debtor is represented by Ian Landsberg, Esq., at ExcoffLandsberg LLP.

The U.S. Trustee has filed a motion seeking to convert CrystalWaterfalls' bankruptcy case to a Chapter 7 case, or to dismiss thecase.

Proceeds from a $60 million 1st lien term loan add-on are expectedto be used to repay $60 million of its second lien note (notrated). The downgrade of the 1st lien credit facilities reflectsthe increasing proportion of 1st lien debt in the capital structureand as a consequence higher expected loss rates in default.

The B3 Corporate Family Rating reflects risk associated with beinga pure-play Hospice operator and the company's high financialleverage. The rating also reflects Curo's small size, the presenceof considerable competition in a fragmented industry and highrevenue concentration from Medicare. Curo faces several legalliabilities related to a 2015 investigation related to its Texasoperations. If resolved, Moody's believes these proceedings willlikely result in cash settlements paid out in 2017 that can befinanced through internally generated cash and its revolver. Thereare also significant business, legal, and integration-relatedadjustments to EBITDA that result in a large delta between GAAP andadjusted figures. These are expected to decline in 2017 and thequality of earnings should improve.

The company's growth strategy has shifted, favoring acceleratedorganic expansion of new offices (de novos) over M&A. Thisincreased investment will offset some of the growth in the basebusiness in the short term. That said, Moody's believes officesopened in 2016 will begin to contribute to earnings growth in 2017,resulting in debt/EBITDA declining to under 6 times (Moody's doesnot add back de novo losses, among other adjustments). The ratingalso reflects the company's position as the third largestfor-profit hospice operator in the US.

Curo's good liquidity profile is supported by expectations ofimproving positive free cash flow and low capital expendituredemands of its business. Moody's expects cash to be modest at about$6 million after its proposed capital structure rebalancing.Liquidity is also supported by a $45 million undrawn revolver withapproximately $39 million of availability after taking account forletters of credit. Depending on the timing and magnitude of anylegal settlement, Moody's believes the company could draw on therevolver with the expectation it would be repaid shortlythereafter. Mandatory debt amortization is modest at $4.4 millionper year. The credit agreement contains a 1st lien maximum debt toEBITDA financial covenant of 6.5 times. Moody's expects the companyto maintain ample cushion even after the proposed increase in firstlien debt.

The positive outlook reflects Moody's expectation that acombination of modest earnings growth and debt repayment willresult in debt to EBITDA declining to under 6 times by mid-2017.

The ratings could be upgraded if the company can consistentlygenerate free cash flow with debt to EBITDA improving towards 5.5times (including a decline in adjustments leading to better qualityof earnings). Resolution of its outstanding investigation wouldalso be needed for an upgrade.

The ratings could be downgraded if liquidity deteriorates or freecash flow turns negative. The ratings could also be downgraded ifdebt to EBITDA is sustained above 6.5 times.

Headquartered in Mooresville, North Carolina, Curo Health ServicesHoldings, Inc. is a provider of hospice services in theSoutheastern and Southwestern regions of the U.S. and operates 221agencies in 21 states. The company recognized revenues of $426million for the twelve months ended September 30, 2016. Curo isowned by private equity firm Thomas H. Lee L.P.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business andConsumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

DAVITA INC: Veterans Affairs Accord Credit Positive, Moody's Says-----------------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service commented that DaVita's (Ba3 stable)settlement with the US Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) is creditpositive because it will boost the dialysis provider's alreadystrong liquidity profile. Under the terms of the settlement, DaVitawill be awarded $538 million in pre-tax consideration.

DEER MEADOWS: Can File Plan of Reorganization Until April 17------------------------------------------------------------Judge Peter C. McKittrick of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Oregon extended the deadline for Deer Meadows, LLC tofile its plan of reorganization and disclosure statement to April17, 2017, and the exclusivity period to June 15, 2017.

Judge McKittrick had earlier extended the Debtor's the deadline onan interim basis through January 31, 2017.

The Troubled Company Reporter had earlier reported that the Debtorsought for exclusivity extension, contending that at the casemanagement conference, it had informed the Court that it was innegotiations with a prospective purchaser of its real property andbusiness assets. That sale will likely occur with an anticipatedclosing of April 1, 2017. The Debtor further contended that oncethe sale is consummated, the Debtor will either (a) file aliquidated plan, (b) seek to convert its case to a chapter 7 caseor seek to dismiss this case.

Accordingly, the Debtor believed it can propose a viable plan ofreorganization. Such that, if a liquidating plan is the chosenpath, the Debtor needs sufficient time to draft these documents,circulate them to key creditors and parties in interest,incorporate their input and finalize the documents before filingthem. But, if either conversion or dismissal is the chosen path, aplan of reorganization will not be needed.

About Deer Meadows

Deer Meadows filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Ore. Case No.16-33768) on Sept. 30, 2016. The petition was signed by KristinHarder, manager. The case is assigned to Judge Peter C.McKittrick. The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1million to $10 million at the time of the filing.

Gail Brehm Geiger, the Acting United States Trustee for theDistrict of Oregon, appointed Suzanne Koenig, as the Patient CareOmbudsman for Deer Meadows, LLC.

DESERT SPRINGS: Palm Springs Buying Cathedral Property for $4.3M----------------------------------------------------------------Judge Mark S. Wallace of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the CentralDistrict of California will convene a hearing on Jan. 10, 2017 at2:00 p.m. to consider Desert Springs Financial, LLC's biddingprocedures in connection with its sale of real property located at68051 Ramon Road, Cathedral City, California, APN 680-190-034("Bowling") and 57% interest in APN 680-190-036 to Palm SpringsFinancial Group, LLC ("PSFG"), for $4,300,000, or to a higher andbetter bidder, concurrently with the completion of thecourt-approved sale of Towers, APN 680-190-033 and 43% interest inAPN 680-190-036 to GK Real Estate Group, LLC for $2,290,000 on Feb.28, 2017, or other deadline as set by the court.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Feb. 21, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. Objection deadline is 14 days prior to the hearing.

The Debtor owns 3 adjacent parcels of real property that are thesubject of the Motion. The first is the Bowling and is the subjectof the Motion for approval of sale. It is a commercial buildingleased to Ramon Palm Lane, Inc. ("RPL"), facing west and isoperating as a bowling alley with a snack bar and grill and a smallpro shop. It is identified as APN 680-190-034. Ownership of theparcel includes a 57% interest in an association membership ofRamon Tower Business Park, Inc. It also includes the rights andobligations of Lessor arising from an existing lease with RPL andguaranty of Yun Hei Shin and Jin Yeo Lee.

The sale of the second parcel was court approved on Nov. 8, 2016,and is configured as a commercial office/retail property facingnorth located at 68031 Ramon Road, Cathedral City, California("Towers"). The parcel is identified as Assessor's Parcel Number680-190-033-8. Ownership of the parcel includes a 43% interest inan association membership of Ramon Tower Business Park, Inc., whichassociation owns and controls the Parking Area servicing theparcel. The third is the Parking Area, APN 680-190-036 ("ParkingArea").

On July 20, 2016, the Debtor filed a motion for approval of sale ofthe Towers property which was denied without prejudice on Aug. 24,2017 because free and clear title could not pass to the purchaserwithout consent of lienholders. Lienholders did not consent.

A second motion was filed Oct. 3, 2016, but was never heard andbecame moot upon the filing of a new motion.

A third motion for the sale of Towers and refinance of Bowlingproperty was heard and approved on Nov. 8, 2016. The sale andrefinance were to be completed on Dec. 8, 2016. The refinancefailed to materialize due to conditions of the lender that theDebtor was unable to satisfy despite best efforts. Socotra Capitalconditioned funding of the refinance loan upon receipt of financialstatements of the Lease Guarantors, Yun Hei Shin and Jin Yeo Lee. Guarantors refused and failed to provide the requested financialstatements as required by the terms of the lease. Socotra alsorequired general releases of liability from Ramon Palm Lane, Inc.,and Yun Hei (Angie) Shin, individually, in favor of the Debtor andMurray Altman, individually, including a waiver of the provisionsof California Civil Code Section 1542. RPL/Shin declined toprovide the requested releases. Thus, the conditions for fundingthe refinance were not satisfied. Nevertheless, the approved saleof Towers remains ready to close.

On Dec. 13, 2016, a Motion to establish bid procedures and set thedate for approval of the sale of Bowling was filed and served witha hearing date of Dec. 20, 2016. The hearing date was continued bythe court sua sponte to Jan. 10, 2017.

On Dec. 20, 2016, a motion to extend the closing date on Towers andapprove the sale of the Bowling property to be closed concurrentlywith Towers was filed and served with hearing date of Jan. 10,2017. Creditor RPL/Shin requested the motion be continued and thecourt continued both the Motion and the motion to approve bidprocedures to Jan. 24, 2017.

At the hearing on Jan. 24, 2017, both motions were denied withoutprejudice. The court did not approve or establish proposed bidprocedures but denied the motion without prejudice. With respectto the motion to approve the sale, the Court noted that the Debtorhad not complied with LBR 6004-l(f), Publication of Notice of Saleof Estate Property, and suggested that proposed bid proceduresincluded in a timely filed and published Notice of Sale will bedeemed adequate notice to potential bidders.

The escrow for the court-approved sale of Towers remains open andthe approved purchaser is ready to fund and close pending approvalof the sale.

The salient terms of the Purchase Agreement are:

a. Purchased Property: The Bowling property is 25,000 sq. footcommercial building (APN 680-190-034) and 57% interest in theadjoining parking lot. The building is currently being used andoperated as a bowling alley known as Palm Springs Lanes, operatedby Ramon Palm Lane, Inc. under lease effective Sept. 2, 2008 toSept. 30, 2023. The purchase price includes transfer of Lessor'srights and obligations arising from the lease from the Seller tothe Buyer upon close of escrow.

g. The Purchase Money Note from the Buyer in the amount of$1,500,000 secured by the Purchase Money Deed of Trust to theSeller. The terms of the Purchase Money Note require monthlyinterest-only payments to the Seller at 5% per annum from close ofescrow with the balance of principle and interest to be paid infull within 30 months of close of escrow. The Purchase Money Noteand Purchase Money Deed of Trust are junior and subordinate only tothe existing notes and/or the New Loan. Should Proposed Purchasersell the property within 30 months of close of escrow, it will paySeller the amount of unpaid principle and interest on the PurchaseMoney Note plus 25% of the net difference between the purchaseprice set forth and the new sales price from the later sale or$250,000, whichever is less.

h. Sale Free and Clear: The Sales will be free and clear of allliens, claims or interests subject to the unexpired leaseholdinterests of 111 Smoke Shop and RPL.

i. Breakup Fee: $50,000

On Nov. 8, 2016, the sale of an adjacent property, Towers, to GKReal Estate Group for $2,290,000, all cash, was Court approved. The escrow for the Towers sale is required to be concurrent withthe close of the Bowling property so title to both properties canbe transferred free and clear. Thus, escrow for the sale andescrow for the sale of Towers are to close concurrently andsimultaneously on or prior to a closing deadline to be approved bythe Court. Should a qualified overbid be accepted and approved, itwill be subject to the same requirement.

RPL has a leasehold interest in the parcel based on a leaseeffective Sept. 1, 2008 to Sept. 30, 2023, with an option for 10year extension. Monthly rent obligation is currently $49,790 permonth until Sept. 30, 2017, after which time it increases 5% andincreases 5% each year thereafter. Projected rental income fromFeb. 1, 2017 to Sept. 30, 2023, is $4,665,550. The tenant wascurrent with the monthly rental obligation through January 2017. Rent for February will have become due before the hearing on theMotion.

If not paid, it will be applied to all or any portion of theSecurity Deposit for the payment of any amount already due Lessor,for Rents which will be due in the future, and/or to reimburse orcompensate Lessor for any liability, expense, loss or damage whichLessor may suffer or incur by reason thereof. The lessee'sobligations under the lease are personally guaranteed by Yun HeiShin and Jin Yeo Lee. The sale of the parcel includes the transferof rights, obligations, and interests of the parties to the lease,and any overbid would be subject to same.

A review of the case will reveal that the tenant and guarantor(RPL/Shin) sued Debtor in state court asking, among other things,that the lease be rescinded. The State Court found the lease to bevalid and enforceable but the amount of rent was modified to theamounts stated above. A money judgment was awarded to RPL/Shin torecover overpaid rent and attorney fees. The overpaid rent withinterest will have been fully paid by Debtor as of the date of thehearing of the Motion.

Bidders should also be aware and take note that the tenant andguarantor have filed repeated objections in the bankruptcy case tothe sale of the adjacent Towers property to anyone but themselves. They oppose the use of any portion of the Towers for marijuanarelated business. They have asked the bankruptcy court for anorder allowing, them to terminate the Bowling property lease andguaranty without notice or opportunity to be heard should a tenantof the Towers property operate a marijuana dispensary during theterm of the lease. The court has not issued the requested order.

c. RPL and Shin: Judgment lien. The calculated balancewill be $1,211,031 as of Feb. 28, 2017. This amount does notinclude the disputed's creditor claim for post-judgment andpost-petition attorney fees and costs. The creditor claims theamount should be increased about $250,000 to $300,000 due tointerest, fees and costs.

The proposed sale of Bowling property is subject to higher andbetter bids.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

a. Minimum Overbid: $4,400,000. It may include up to $1,500,000of seller financing.

b. Bid Increment: Must be at least $50,000 more than theprevious qualified bid.

c. Bid Deadline: Feb. 18, 2017

d. Commission: Proposed Purchaser and the Seller of the Bowlingproperty are both represented by broker, Mike Radlovic. Mr.Radlovic agreed to accept reduced commission of 4% of the pricepaid by the Proposed Purchaser for the Bowling property. Thecommission is to be paid to Coldwell Banker Commercial - SC;Broker, Mike Radlovic, from escrow.

e. Should an overbid on the Bowling property be accepted andapproved, commission of 5% as set forth in the listing agreement,will be divided equally between Seller' broker and the Buyer'sbroker, if any.

f. PSFG is deemed to be a qualified bidder for the purposes ofbidding and overbidding.

g. Credit Bidding: Secured creditors RPL/Shin will be entitledto credit bid in the amount of their allowed claim(s).

h. Auction: Feb. 21, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. at the Court.

i. Free and Clear: The sale is free and clear of all liens,claims, encumbrances and interests of any and every nature and kindwhatsoever and however arising.

A copy of the Agreement and Bidding Procedures attached to theMotion is available for free at:

The immediate completion of the sales is necessary for the orderlyreorganization of the Debtor given the relief of stay granted toShin who purchased the secured note and 1st Deed of Trust fromPacific Premier Bank and judgment creditors RPL and Shin. On Jan.12, 2017, Shin recorded a Notice of Default on the Note. The90-day cure period will expire April 12, 2017. The concurrentclosing of the purchase and the purchase of Towers will eliminatethe threat of foreclosure and will be of more benefit to the estateand its stakeholders than a foreclosure sale. Accordingly, theDebtor asks the Court to approve the proposed sale of the Bowlingproperty pursuant to established Bid Procedures; and the concurrentclosing of escrows to transfer free and clear title to the Towersand Bowling properties subject to the existing leases.

The Debtor asks the Court to waive the 14-day stay pursuant to theFRBP Rule 6004(h) and that the property maybe sold immediately uponthe entry of the Order granting the relief requested.

In August 2016, Law360's Ms. O'Sullivan reported that the NewJersey Appellate Division for the first time clarified thatanticipated legal fees constitute a valid security interest underthe Uniform Commercial Code, handing a victory to a bankruptattorney's creditor who challenged the distribution priority of theattorney's assets.

In a published opinion on an issue of first impression in NewJersey courts, a three-judge panel upended a lower court's rulingthat creditor OKS Realty could collect on its $125,000 loan toAcciavatti only after two other creditors got paid becauseAcciavatti didn't yet have a true interest in the fees she pledgedto OKS as collateral. The panel rejected the lower court judge'sreasoning that because Acciavatti secured the loan with anticipatedcounsel fees from a malpractice lawsuit, they were an asset thatdidn't exist at the time it was promised. The lower court judge'sreasoning "clearly ignored" the language of the security agreementbetween OKS and Acciavatti, which identified the counsel fees ascollateral for the loan, the panel said. The anticipated feesindeed qualified as an account and therefore an asset ofAcciavatti's, under the secured transactions provision of UCCguidelines, the panel ruled. OKS further complied with UCCrequirements to "perfect," or ensure, the security interest byfiling a financing statement covering the collateral ofAcciavatti's anticipated counsel fees, the opinion said.

The December 2010 statement was filed before the other creditors,accounting firm Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger & Guttilla PC andthe law firm Gourvitz & Gourvitz LLC, entered their own liensagainst Acciavatti.

Acciavati filed for bankruptcy in March 2014.

DIRECTBUY HOLDINGS: Westchester Fire Tries to Block Auction-----------------------------------------------------------Vince Sullivan, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reports thatWestchester Fire Insurance Co., the issuer of surety bonds onbehalf of DirectBuy Holdings Inc., filed with the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the District of Delaware an objection to the Debtor'sproposed bidding procedures for the Debtor's planned Chapter 11auction includes a list of contracts and leases to be assumed andassigned or rejected. The report adds that the list includes acash collateral agreement held by the surety.

According to Law360, Westchester Fire said that the plan to assignthe surety's cash collateral agreement won't fly.

DirectBuy Holdings estimated $100 million to $500 million in bothassets and liabilities. The petitions were signed by Michael P.Bornhorst, chief executive officer.

The Company's Canadian subsidiaries were slated on Nov. 2, 2016, tocommence proposal proceedings under the Bankruptcy and InsolvencyAct to obtain an Order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justiceapproving proposals to be made by the Canadian Subsidiaries totheir respective creditors under Part III of the BIA.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, appointed fivecreditors of DirectBuy Holdings, Inc., to serve on the officialcommittee of unsecured creditors.

ENTERCOM COMMS: CBS Merger Won't Impact Moody's B1 Corp Rating--------------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service says Entercom Communications Corp.'sannouncement that it has entered into a merger agreement with CBSRadio Inc. is expected to be a credit positive, but is not expectedto lead to a change in the B1 corporate family rating. The existingdebt at CBS Radio, including $960 million of term loan B and $400million of senior notes, is expected to remain outstanding as thechange of control provision was not triggered by the transaction,while the $480 million of existing debt at Entercom will berefinanced with a new $500 million term loan B.

Entercom Communications Corp., headquartered in Bala Cynwyd, PA, isone of the largest US radio broadcasters based on revenue. Revenuefor the 12 months ended September 30, 2016 was $455 million.

EXTREME OUTDOOR: Hires R Todd Luoma as Special Counsel------------------------------------------------------Extreme Outdoor Adventures, LLC seeks authorization from the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California to employR. Todd Luoma as special counsel with respect to tax matters andspecifically the claim of the California State Board ofEqualization ("BOE"), effective January 17, 2017.

The Debtor requires Mr. Luoma to:

(a) represent the Debtor with regard to tax matters and in particular the disputed claim of the BOE;

(b) advise and represent the Debtor with respect to the claim of the BOE within the present Chapter 11 case; and

(c) communicate with and negotiate as necessary with the BOE and other parties of interest in this case.

The Debtor and Mr. Luoma propose that compensation be on an hourlybasis. Mr. Luoma's hourly date is $490 per hour.

Mr. Luoma will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocketexpenses incurred.

R. Todd Luoma of Williams & Associates, P.C. assured the Court thatthe firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined inSection 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent anyinterest adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

EXTREME OUTDOOR: Taps Stephen Reynolds as Attorney--------------------------------------------------Extreme Outdoor Adventures, LLC seeks authorization from the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California to employStephen M. Reynolds of Reynolds Law Corporation as attorney, nuncpro tunc to January 17, 2017.

The Debtor requires Reynolds Law to:

(a) prepare and file complete schedules and statements in support of relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Code;

(b) advise and represent the Debtor within the present Chapter 11 case;

(c) obtain employment of professionals as necessary for the proper administration of the estate and case;

(d) obtain court authority for the use of cash collateral;

(e) communicate with and negotiate as necessary with the creditors and other parties of interest in this case;

(f) obtain Court authority for any and all actions necessary to

the administration of the estate, including funding;

(g) propose and obtain confirmation of a Plan of Reorganization;

(h) all other actions necessary for the proper administration of the estate; and

(i) obtain court authority for the sale of certain property of the estate.

The Debtor and Mr. Reynolds propose that compensation be on anhourly basis. Mr. Reynolds' hourly date is $350 per hour. ReynoldsLaw received $ 12,000 as a prepetition retainer. Of that sum $1,717was used to pay the Chapter 11 filing fee and $6,650 forprepetition legal fees.

Reynolds Law will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocketexpenses incurred.

Stephen M. Reynolds assured the Court that the firm is a"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) ofthe Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse tothe Debtor and its estate.

Swift Financial believes that the Debtor has continued to use itscash collateral as a debtor-in-possession, without SwiftFinancial's consent or without having filed any motion seekingauthority from the Court. Swift financial says that the Debtor hasmade no effort to ensure that Swift Financial's cash collateral isadequately protected, putting Swift Financial's security inimmediate jeopardy, at risk of diminution without adequateprotection.

Swift Financial relates that it has entered into a FutureReceivables Sale Agreement with the Debtor. Pursuant to theAgreement, the Debtor sold to Swift Financial all of its rights andinterest on its Future Receivables in a certain dollar value andwas required to pay to Swift Financial 8% of its FutureReceivables. The dollar value of the Future Receivables sold bythe Debtor was $99,675. The Purchase Price paid by Swift Financialwas $75,000.

However, Swift Financial further relates that, to date, the isdelinquent in payments and owes Swift Financial $75,519, plus feesand costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, all of whichcontinue to accrue.

Swift Financial tells the Court that it objects to the Debtor'scontinued use of Cash Collateral because the Debtor retained norights in the existing and future receivables as it has alreadysold these to Swift Financial, and thus the Debtor may not use thecash proceeds of those receivables as cash collateral.

Fahey Exteriors, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition(Bankr. S.D.W. Va. Case No. 16-30572) on December 15, 2016. ThePetition was signed by Joshua Fahey, Member. At the time offiling, the Debtor estimated assets at $50,000 to $100,000 andliabilities at $500,000 to $1 million.

Reid and Patsy Scott hold a perfected, prepetition lien upon therents collected from the use of the Debtor's property located at9066 Camp Firestone Drive, Nebo, North Carolina, by virtue of acertain Deed of Trust.

The Debtor is authorized to use cash collateral in the ordinarycourse of business to pay for ordinary and customary expensesassociated with the ownership and business of a marina, includingthe payment of regular mortgage payments to Morganton Savings Bankin the monthly amount of $6,251 and the U.S. Small BusinessAdministration in the monthly amount of $1,526.

The Scotts are granted valid, attached, choate, enforceable,perfected and continuing security interests in, and liens upon allpost-petition assets of the Debtor of the same character and type,to the same extent and validity as the liens and encumbrances ofthe Scotts attached to the Debtor's assets pre-petition.

The Debtor is directed to make an adequate protection payment tothe Scotts in the amount of $3,000 on or before Feb. 3, 2017.

FINJAN HOLDINGS: Subsidiary Issued its First U.S. Patent--------------------------------------------------------Finjan Holdings, Inc., announced that its subsidiary, FinjanMobile, Inc., received its first patent. U.S. Patent No. 9,554,279was issued on Jan. 24, 2017, and is titled "Authorized Areas ofAuthentication."

"Finjan's return to development and reclaiming of its position as aleading cybersecurity technology company has been aggressive andpurposeful. The issuance of our first patent in Finjan Mobile is ahuge milestone," said Phil Hartstein, president and CEO of FinjanHoldings. "While we are using many of Finjan's existing patents inour Mobile products, it remains essential that we meet the growingconsumer demand for privacy and protection, which is why wecontinue to innovate outside of our landmark technology and areworking to offer the best-in-class mobile privacy and securityofferings in our products."

Finjan Mobile is focused on providing state-of-the-art cybertechnologies in a mobile platform, previously only available inbusiness and enterprise applications. Much of Finjan's earlypatented inventions form the base of Finjan Mobile's VitalSecuritySecure Browser with development of new technologies continuingtoday, as demonstrated by the current patent issuance. The Gen3VitalSecurity offering is being installed on roughly 1000 newdevices each day. Additional features and functions are expectedin Gen3.5 with a planned launch in the first quarter of 2017.Finjan Mobile's VitalSecurity products are available for downloadon Android and iOS platform devices.

About Finjan

Finjan, formerly known as Converted Organics, is a leading onlinesecurity and technology company which owns a portfolio of patents,related to software that proactively detects malicious code andthereby protects end-users from identity and data theft, spyware,malware, phishing, trojans and other online threats. Founded in1997, Finjan is one of the first companies to develop and patenttechnology and software that is capable of detecting previouslyunknown and emerging threats on a real-time, behavior-based basis,in contrast to signature-based methods of intercepting only knownthreats to computers, which were previously standard in the onlinesecurity industry.

Finjan Holdings reported a net loss of $12.6 million in 2015, anet loss of $10.5 million in 2014 and a net loss of $6.07 millionin 2013.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Finjan had $15.04 million in total assets,$4.57 million in total liabilities, $13.68 million in redeemablepreferred stock and $3.22 million in stockholders' deficit.

FIRST PHOENIX-WESTON: Simplicity to be Paid 4% Per Annum Over 7 Yrs-------------------------------------------------------------------First Phoenix-Weston LLC and FPG & LCD, L.L.C. filed with theWestern District of Wisconsin a joint disclosure statement datedJan. 30, 2017, referring to the Debtors' plan of reorganization.

Class 5 Intercompany Claims against FPG, estimated at $600,405,will be offset and any remaining balance will be paid in quarterlyinstallments in amounts equal to 10% of the Debtor's net incomeafter estimating for necessary, accrued income taxes. FPG reservesthe right to object to Weston's filed claim within 30 days of theEffective Date.

Class 7 General Unsecured Claims against Weston, estimated at$120,561, and against FPG, estimated at $113,940, will be paid infull in four installments, occurring 3, 9, 15, and 21 months afterthe Effective Date. First Phoenix Group LLC will waive anydistribution to which it may be entitled under the Plan by eitherthe Debtor. Any creditor in Class 7 may elect to have its claimreduced to $2,500 and paid as Class 8 Claim, Convenience Claims.

Funding on the cash payments due on the Effective Date will be fromthe Debtors' operations during the Chapter 11 cases. Funding ofthe Plan's future installments to creditors will come from thenormal operations of the Debtors' business after confirmation ofthe Plan.

The Court has set for March 10, 2017, a preliminary hearing on theconfirmation of the Plan. Ballots are to be returned to thecounsel for the Debtors by March 3, 2017, which is also thedeadline for the filing of objections to the confirmation of thePlan.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 30, 2017, theDebtors filed with the Court a joint disclosure statement andaccompanying joint plan of reorganization dated Jan. 23, 2017,which proposed that Debtors pay Class 6 Sabra Unsecured Claim --estimated at $4,773,4383 -- at a rate of 4% per annum over 35 yearswith no prepayment penalties.

About First Phoenix-Weston

First Phoenix-Weston, LLC, and FPG & LCD, L.L.C., were formed in2010 to organize, develop, and manage an assisted living andskilled nursing care facility near three major regional hospitalsin Central Wisconsin including St. Clare's Hospital, which is justa block away. The Facility combines an assisted living facilitytogether with a skilled nursing facility in a resort-likeatmosphere for its patients. The business is commonly known as the"Stoney River" assisted living and rehab. The Facility iscomprised of two integrated businesses: a 35-unit skilled nursingrehabilitation center (commonly referred to as the skilled nursingfacility, or "SNF"), and a 60- unit assisted living facility (the"ALF").

First Phoenix-Weston, LLC, and FPG & LCD, L.L.C., filed Chapter 11bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. W.D. Wisc. Case Nos. 16-12820 and16-12821) on Aug. 15, 2016. The petitions were signed by PhilipCastleberg, as part-owner. The Debtors estimate assets andliabilities in the range of $10 million to $50 million. MichaelBest & Friedrich LLP serves as counsel to the Debtors.

FORBES ENERGY: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for March 8-----------------------------------------------------------The Hon. David R. Jones of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Texas will hold a hearing on March 8, 2017, at 10:00a.m. (prevailing Central Time) at 1133 N. Shoreline Blvd., CorpusChristi, Texas, to consider the adequacy of the disclosurestatement explaining the prepackaged Chapter 11 plan filed byForbes Energy Services Ltd. and certain of its debtor-affiliates. Objections, if any, are due Feb. 27, 2017, at 5:00 p.m. (prevailingCentral Time).

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 26, 2017,under the Plan, holders of Class 5 General Unsecured Claims --estimated at approximately $4 million to $8 million -- isunimpaired, and will receive payment in full under the Plan.

The Plan is supported by the Debtors and the supporting noteholdersrepresenting approximately 65.40% of the allowed senior unsecurednotes claims. After months of active and arm's-lengthnegotiations, the Debtors, in consultation with its advisors,reached agreement on the terms of the Plan with the supportingnoteholders, representing a substantial majority by principalamount of the Holders of Senior Unsecured Notes Claims. TheDebtors believe that the Plan is the best restructuring alternativereasonably available to the Debtors. Because holders of SeniorUnsecured Notes Claims are the only impaired creditor class underthe Plan, only the holders are entitled to vote on the Plan.

Through confirmation of the Plan, the Debtors will restructure andsubstantially deleverage its balance sheet; obtain new exitfinancing on advantageous terms; reduce its cash interest expenseto a level that is aligned with its expected future cash flows; andretain additional flexibility to invest in growth initiatives tomaximize enterprise value.

The Debtors had outstanding debt having a principal amount of over$300 million. Upon emergence from Chapter 11, the ReorganizedDebtors expect to have outstanding debt primarily consisting ofobligations under a contemplated $50 million term loan ExitFacility.

Pursuant to the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Debtors haveobtained the agreement of Holders of approximately 65.40% inprincipal amount of the Senior Unsecured Notes to vote in supportof the Plan. The Senior Unsecured Notes represent $280 million inprincipal obligations owed by the Debtors, plus projected accruedinterest of approximately $32 million as of Jan. 23, 2017. Underthe Plan, the Senior Unsecured Notes will be exchanged for $20million in cash and 100% of the New Common Stock in ReorganizedParent, subject to dilution on account of shares issued oravailable for issuance under the Management Incentive Plan. Allowed Secured Claims either will be reinstated or paid in fullunder the Plan. Equity Interests in FES Ltd., inclusive of theExisting Preferred Stock, will be extinguished.

The Plan is feasible and will be implemented with existingcash-on-hand and $50 million of funding under the Exit Facility tobe made available to the Reorganized Debtors by participatingHolders of the Senior Unsecured Notes who become Exit Facilitylenders. The Exit Facility will be backstopped by certain of thelargest Holders of the Senior Unsecured Notes.

The Debtors have a forbearance agreement in place with the SeniorSecured Lenders through Dec. 28, 2016. The Debtors are negotiatingan extension of forbearance through Jan. 31, 2017, which theDebtors expect to execute in the near future. In the event thatagreement on a forbearance extension is not reached, the Debtorsmay be required to repay the revolving advances under the SeniorSecured Loan Agreement, or to commence a bankruptcy case prior tothe conclusion of the solicitation period on the Plan.

Forbes Energy Services Ltd. filed voluntary petitions forreorganization under chapter 11 of the United States BankruptcyCode (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-20023) on Jan. 22, 2017 foritself and its principal subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of thepreviously disclosed Restructuring Support Agreement with certainholders of the Company's 9% senior unsecured notes due 2019.

The Debtors' financial advisors is Alvarez & Marsal Holdings, LLC.

The Debtors' investment bankers is Jefferies LLC. The Debtors'corporate and securities counsel is Winstead PC. The Debtors'solicitation and balloting consultants is Kurtzman CarsonConsultants LLC.

The Debtors had $332.57 million in total assets and $337.03 millionin total debts as of Sept. 30, 2016.

FORBES ENERGY: Wants to Use Regions Bank Cash Collateral--------------------------------------------------------Forbes Energy Services Ltd. and its affiliated Debtors seekauthorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the SouthernDistrict of Texas to use cash collateral and the proceeds of allcollateral pledged to Regions Bank, in its capacity as agent foritself and certain other financial institutions.

The Debtors believe that as of the Petition Date, the balance inthe Pledged Cash Collateral Account is $27,562,703.

The Debtors, with the assistance of their advisors, developed acash flow forecast and Budget for the use of Cash Collateralpending consummation of the Plan. The proposed Budget reflects atotal cash flow of $600,000 from January 20, 2017 through March 24,2017.

The Debtors believe that absent access to cash collateral to makethe expenditures contemplated by the Budget, they would be requiredto convert their cases to chapter 7 and liquidate on a piecemealbasis, causing irreparable harm to the Debtors and their estates. The Debtors contend that they have an urgent and immediate need forcash collateral.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors were jointly and severallyindebted and liable to Regions Bank for outstanding revolver loansin the principal amount of $15,000,000; certain Bank ProductObligations, reimbursement obligations in respect of letters ofcredit, which had an aggregate face amount of $9,012,098; and fees,expenses, and other costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and charges.

Pursuant to the Loan Documents, the Debtors granted Regions Banksecurity interests in and liens upon all:

(1) the deposit account of Forbes Energy Services LLC;

(2) all deposits or other remittances at any time made to andbalances in the Pledged Cash Collateral Account;

(3) any and all investments made at any time of any balancesin the Pledged Cash Collateral Account; and

(4) any and all proceeds of any of these properties.

The Debtors propose to grant Regions Bank valid, binding,enforceable and automatically perfected liens on and securityinterests in all personal property of each Debtor that is of thesame type or nature as the Pre-Petition Collateral whetheracquired, created, or existing prior to, on or after the PetitionDate, and all cash and non-cash proceeds of such personalproperty.

The Debtors propose to pay Regions Bank, in cash, interest and feesthat have accrued in respect of the Pre-Petition Debt at the ratesspecified in the Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents. Asadditional adequate protection, the Debtors will pay Regions Bank,in cash, the reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expensesincurred by Regions Bank, payable or reimbursable under any of theLoan Documents, including, but not limited to, fees anddisbursements of counsel.

Regions Bank will also be granted an administrative priority claimunder section 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code in the amount, if any,should the protections afforded for the Debtors' use, sale,consumption or disposition of any Pre-Petition Collateral prove tobe inadequate.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated January 19, 2017, isavailable at https://is.gd/yZP9Ac

The Debtors disclosed $332.57 million in total assets and $337.03million in total debts as of Sept. 30, 2016.

FOREST PARK MEDICAL: Treatment of Employee Claims Amended---------------------------------------------------------Forest Park Medical Center, LLC, filed with the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the Eastern District of Texas a disclosure statement forholders of claims in Class 1 in connection with its first amendedplan of liquidation, dated Jan. 20, 2017.

Class 1 creditors are composed of persons and similar persons witha current or prior contractual relationship with the Debtor or theOther Entities for the rendition of personal services to or for thebenefit of the Debtor.

Because the $1.54 million held by the Debtor would normally be usedexclusively to satisfy the Allowed $5.17 million AdministrativeClaims of the Hospital Landlords, the Debtor has negotiated anoption for employees and similar persons with a current or priorcontractual relationship with the Debtor or the Other Entities forthe rendition of personal services to or for the benefit of theDebtor to elect to receive payments under the Plan by electing tobecome Holders of Allowed Class 1 Claims. This is called making the"Class 1 Election."

Holders of Allowed Class 1 Claims with a Texas Workforce Commission(TWC) Order in their favor may vote on their Ballot to receive aDistribution equal to:

(i) the amount of any TWC Order in favor of such Holder withoutinterest, fees or charges;

(ii) minus any amounts paid to such Holder on account of any TWCOrder in favor of such Holder;

(iii) plus $500.00.

However, the amounts in (i) and (ii), when combined, may not exceed$12,475.00, because the Bankruptcy Code limits the maximum amountof priority claims that any individual may assert against a debtorin bankruptcy to $12,475.00. For demonstrative purposes only, anAllowed Class 1 Claim Holder with a TWC Order in favor of theHolder in the amount of $5,000 who has previously received $1,000under the TWC Order will receive a single Distribution of $5,000,minus $1,000 previously received, plus $500, for a total payment of$4,500. An Allowed Class 1 Claim Holder with a TWC Order in favorof that Holder in the amount of $15,000 who has previously received$1,000 under the TWC Order will receive a single Distribution of$12,475.00 plus $500, for a total payment of $12,975.00.

Holders of Allowed Class 1 Claims who do not have a TWC Orderrendered in their favor will receive a single Distribution equalto:

(i) that Holder's Allowed unpaid wage, salary, personal serviceor commission claims, which arise out of that Holder's rendition ofpersonal services to or for the benefit of the Debtor, excludingvacation, severance, sick or other employee benefits of any kind,without interest, fees or charges as reflected in the Debtor'sbooks and records and not to exceed $12,475.00;

(ii) plus $500.00.

For demonstrative purposes only, an Allowed Class 1 Claim Holderwithout a TWC Order in favor of that Holder but who has unpaidwages in the amount of $1,500 will receive a single Distribution of$1,500 plus $500 for a total payment of $2,000. An Allowed Class 1Claim Holder without a TWC Order in favor of that Holder but whohas unpaid wages in the amount of $15,000 will receive a singleDistribution of $12,475, plus $500, for a total payment of $12,975.

From and after the Effective Date, the Debtor will continue inexistence solely for the purposes consistent with the terms of thisPlan, which include:

Forest Park Medical Center at Fort Worth, LLC, is a doctor-ownedTexas limited liability company that owns and operates the ForestPark Medical Center, a state of the art medical facility,includingprivate rooms, family suites and intensive care rooms located inWest Fort Worth, Texas. The hospital employs 175 persons on afull-time or part-time basis. The hospital offers a broad rangeofsurgical services.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed inthis case by the United States Trustee, and is represented by ColeSchotz PC and Arent Fox, LLP lawyers.

FORT WALKER: Lanciones Buying Beaufort County Property for $800K----------------------------------------------------------------Fort Walker Holdings, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theWestern District of Pennsylvania to authorize the sale of realproperty located at 31 Fort Walker Drive, Lot 3, Section M-2, PortRoyal Plantation, Beaufort County, South Carolina, to Richard andJoyce Lancione, or their assigns, for $800,000.

The Debtor owns the property. The Debtor has executed Contract ofSale – Offer and Acceptance, dated Dec. 14, 2016, with the Buyersfor the purchase of the property. Ernest money in the amount of$40,000 is being held in escrow by Carolina Realty Group. Theproperty is being sold as-is, where-is.

A copy of the Contract of Sale attached to the Motion is availablefor free at:

The liens, claims and encumbrances will be transferred to theproceeds of the sale, if and to the extent that they may bedetermined to be valid liens against the property in accordancewith their validity and priority.

The Debtor believes that the proposed sale is fair and reasonableand acceptance and approval of the same is in the best interest ofthe Estate. Accordingly, the Debtor asks that the Court enter anOrder approving the sale of the property to the Buyers or theirassigns free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances.

The Purchasers can be reached at:

Richard and Joyce Lancione 7 Hamilton Drive Bluffton, SC 29909

About Fort Walker Holdings

Fort Walker Holdings LLC, based in Pittsburg, Pa., filed a Chapter11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-22609) on July 14, 2016. The petition was signed by William E. Connolly, principal. TheHon. Gregory L. Taddonio presides over the case. Robert O. Lampl,Esq. serves as bankruptcy counsel. In its petition, the Debtorestimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets andliabilities.

The Debtor employs Carolina Realty Group as real estate broker.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that noofficial committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed intheChapter 11 case of Fort Walker Holdings LLC.

FULLER PROPERTIES: Hearing on Plan Confirmation Set For March 15----------------------------------------------------------------The Hon. Keith L. Phillips of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theEastern District of Virginia has scheduled for March 15, 2017, at10:30 a.m. the hearing to consider the confirmation of the Chapter11 plan filed by Fuller Properties, LLC, on Dec. 22, 2016.

Objections to the confirmation of the Plan must be filed by March8, 2017, which is also the last day for filing written acceptancesor rejections to the Plan.

No later than 35 days prior to the Confirmation Hearing, theproponent of the Plan will mail to creditors, equity securityholders, and other parties-in-interest, and transmit to the U.S.Trustee, the Plan, a ballot conforming to Official Form 14, and anotice of the Confirmation Hearing.

GAINESVILLE HOSPITAL: Jerry Carpenter Is Committee Chairperson--------------------------------------------------------------Jerry Carpenter of Morrison Management Specialists, Inc., has beendesignated as chairperson of the official committee of unsecuredcreditors of Gainesville Hospital District.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Feb. 3, 2017,William T. Neary, the U.S. trustee for Region 6, on Feb. 1appointed these five creditors to serve on the official committeeof unsecured creditors:

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal andaccounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor'sexpense. They may investigate the debtor's business and financialaffairs. Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries tothe general population of creditors they represent.

Gateway is refinancing its existing debt capital with new US$440million first lien term loan and US$255 million second lien notes.Net proceeds will be used to repay existing debt (C$532 million),fund the purchase of two Ontario gaming bundles it won in December2016 (C$192 million), pay a dividend to shareholders (C$100million), and return excess cash to the balance sheet (C$69million). The company plans to put in place a C$125 millionrevolver, which will be undrawn at close.

Ratings Assigned:

C$125 million secured revolving credit facility due 2022, Ba3(LGD3)

US$440 million first lien term loan due 2023, Ba3 (LGD3)

US$255M second lien notes due 2024, Caa1 (LGD5)

Ratings Affirmed:

Corporate Family Rating, B2

Probability of Default Rating, B2-PD

Ratings Unchanged:

C$60 million revolving credit facility due 2018, Ba3 (LGD3); to bewithdrawn at close

First lien term loan A due 2018 (C$198 million outstanding), Ba3(LGD3); to be withdrawn at close

First lien term loan B due 2019 (C$117 million outstanding), Ba3(LGD3); to be withdrawn at close

C$200 million second lien notes due 2020, Caa1 (LGD5); to bewithdrawn at close

Rating Withdrawn:

SGL-3 Speculative Grade Liquidity, WR

Outlook:

Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Gateway's B2 CFR primarily reflects its high pro forma leverage(adjusted Debt/EBITDA) of 6x, small revenue size, and event riskfrom shareholder-friendly financial policies, but mitigated by thesubstantial barriers to entry and favorable gaming regulatoryenvironment in Canada, and its good market position. The ratingalso reflects the company's improved diversity by region andproperty after winning two Ontario gaming bundles, and itseligibility for capital spending reimbursement programs in BritishColumbia. The rating presumes that EBITDA growth and mandatory termloan amortization will enable leverage to decline towards 5.5xwithin the next 12 to 18 months.

Gateway has adequate liquidity. The company's sources of liquiditytotal about C$196 million while it has mandatory debt repayments ofabout C$6 million annually and about C$75 million of expectednegative free cash flow in 2017, resulting from capital spending onthe Ontario properties, a casino renovation and rebranding inAlberta, and expansion and relocation of British Columbiaproperties. Moody's expects about C$45 million of negative freecash flow in 2018 due to additional capital spending on the Ontarioproperties. Gateway's liquidity is supported by pro forma cash ofC$96 million when the refinance transaction closes, and about C$100million of availability under its new C$125 million revolvingcredit facility due in 2022, after accounting for letters ofcredit. The company's new revolver will be subject to a total netleverage covenant with step downs. While the thresholds are yet tobe set, Moody's expects cushion to exceed 25% through the next 4quarters. Gateway has limited ability to generate liquidity fromasset sales as its assets are encumbered.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global GamingIndustry published in June 2014.

Gateway Casinos & Entertainment Limited operates 18 gamingproperties located in British Columbia and Alberta. With two newOntario bundles and potential new builds, the company will operate29 gaming properties. The company is majority owned by The CatalystCapital Group Inc. and is headquartered in Burnaby, BritishColumbia.

GATOR EQUIPMENT: Court Allows Cash Collateral Use on Final Basis----------------------------------------------------------------Judge Robert Summerhays of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theWestern District of Louisiana authorized Debtor Gator CraneServices, LLC to use 1st Source Bank's cash collateral on a finalbasis.

The approved 13-week Budget covered the weeks beginning on the weekending Jan. 20, 2017 and ending April 14, 2017. The Budgetprovided for total expenses in the amount of $115,700 for theperiod beginning on the week ending Feb. 3, 2017 through the weekending March 3, 2017.

Judge Summerhays gave the Debtor 60 days from the date of theCourt's Final Order to object to 1st Source Bank's prepetitionclaim and security interest. The Debtor will be deemed to haveacknowledged 1st Source Bank's prepetition claim and securityinterest if it does not make an objection.

1st Source Bank is granted a security interest in and lien upon thecash collateral and its proceeds, products, rents, offspring andprofits, in the same respective priority 1st Source held prior tothe Petition Date.

The Debtor is directed to properly insure 1st Source Bank'scollateral and name 1st Source Bank as loss payee. The Debtor wasfurther directed to allow 1st Source Bank to inspect its collateralon commercially reasonable terms and conditions.

The Debtor is ordered to provide 1st Source Bank with aged accountsreceivable reporting, showing the amount of both pre andpost-petition receivable son the 1st and 15th days of each month.

The Debtor's use of cash collateral will terminate on the earliestto expire of:

(1) the effective date of a plan confirmed under 11 U.S.C.Section 1129;

(2) the dismissal or conversion of the Chapter 11 case to acase under Chapter of Title 11 of the United States Code;

(3) the appointment of a trustee or examiner under BankruptcyCode Section 1104; or

Gator Equipment Rentals of Iberia and Gator Equipment Rentals ofFourchon each listed under $50,000 in assets and between $1 millionand $10 million in liabilities. Gator Crane Service, and GatorEquipment Rentals listed between $1 million and $10 million in bothassets and liabilities.

Under the latest plan, two more tort claimants were added to Class2, which consists of holders of unliquidated tort claims.

Class 2 now consists of four members: Nicole Caliendo, BarbaraPfneisl, Howard Freedberg and Mary Buck. These tort claimants willretain all rights and remedies they have against the company andunder applicable law, according to the latest disclosurestatement.

A copy of the latest disclosure statement is available for free at

https://is.gd/ADyLMl

About Geralex Inc.

Geralex, Inc., is an Illinois corporation with its principal placeof business in Chicago, Illinois. The company provides janitorialservices to commercial and government facilities, such as airportsand schools. It has been in business since 2003. It is owned byAlejandra Alvarado (60%) and Gerardo Alvarado (40%).

GIBLET INC: Can Use Colorado Department of Revenue Cash Collateral------------------------------------------------------------------Judge Joseph G. Rosania, Jr. of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Colorado authorized The Giblet, Inc. to use theColorado Department of Revenue's cash collateral.

The Colorado DOR is granted the following adequate protection:

(1) The Debtor will provide replacement liens on allpost-petition accounts and accounts receivable to the extent thatthe use of cash collateral results in a decrease in the value ofthe collateral.

(4) The Debtor will only expend cash collateral for thepurpose of ordinary business expenses, including the purchase ofreplacement inventory, payment of employee wages, and overheadexpenses.

(5) The Debtor will timely file all reports and returns withthe Colorado DOR and pay all post-petition taxes due thereunder.

(6) The Debtor will preserve and maintain in good conditionall collateral in which the Colorado DOR has an interest.

(7) The Debtor will pay the Colorado DOR the sum of $1,182.21on a monthly basis, beginning on January 15, 2017, whichconstitutes repayment of the $59,393 Tax Claim plus interest at thestatutory rate of 6% amortized over 58 months.

The Debtor's use of cash collateral will cease in the event thatthe Debtor defaults in the provision of adequate protection, orshould the Debtor fail to confirm a plan of reorganization withinthe time allowed under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Giblet, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D.Colo. Case No. 16-21427) on November 22, 2016. The Petition wassigned by Jason Pechek, authorized representative. At the time offiling, the Debtor estimated assets at $100,000 to $500,000 andliabilities at $500,000 to $1 million.

The Debtor is represented by Robert J. Shilliday, III, Esq., atVorndran Shilliday, P.C.

GRAND VOLUTE: Use of Fifth Third Bank Cash Until Feb. 23 OK-----------------------------------------------------------Judge James W. Boyd of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the WesternDistrict of Michigan authorized Grand Volute Ballrooms, LLC, tocontinue using Fifth Third Bank's cash collateral through February23, 2017, the date on which the Court has scheduled theconfirmation hearing on the Debtor's First Amended Plan.

Judge Boyd held that all provisions of the Court's Sept. 19, 2016Cash Collateral Order will continue to apply and control inrelation to the Debtor's continued use of cash collateral.

The Debtor is directed to make monthly payments of $7,020 to FifthThird Bank, beginning on Dec. 15, 2016, so long as the Court'sOrder remains in place. The Debtor is further directed to providean updated cash flow projection covering the time period from Jan. 23, 2017 through Feb. 23, 2017, within five days from theentry of the Court's Order.

A final hearing on the Debtor's use of cash collateral is scheduledon Feb. 23, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.

Grand Volute Ballrooms, LLC, based in Lowell, Michigan, filed aChapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Mich. Case No. 16-04314) on Aug.19, 2016. The petition was signed by Kent O. McKay, sole member. The case is assigned to Judge James W. Boyd. The Debtor isrepresented by James R. Oppenhuizen, Esq., at Oppenhuizen Law Firm,PLC. The Debtor disclosed $2.27 million total assets and $3.45million total liabilities.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed inthe case.

GRANITE ACQUISITION: Moody's Cuts Corporate Family Rating to B1---------------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service downgraded the corporate family rating(CFR) and senior secured rating of Granite Acquisition Inc., to B1from Ba3. The secured second lien debt was lowered to B3 from B2.Primary reason for the downgrade was continued pressure onGranite's earnings and cash flows from sustained weaker powerprices in the markets where Granite's primary subsidiaryWheelabrator Technologies (Wheelabrator) operates. The outlookremains negative.

"The weak commodity price environment will continue to pressure thecompany's energy margins on a sustained basis, lowering Moody'sexpectations of cash flow to debt to the high single digitspercent," stated Jairo Chung, Moody's analyst. "The company's highmerchant exposure of over 60% of power produced, combined with theupcoming expiration of high priced PPAs in 2019, keeps Moody'soutlook negative" added Chung.

The B1 CFR reflects the continued high exposure to a low commoditypricing environment through its merchant energy segment, as well ashigher construction risk and foreign currency exchange risk throughthe three projects being developed in the U.K. The rating benefitsfrom the stable disposal segment, which accounts for a little morethan half the company's revenues, is highly contracted and providesrelatively stable earnings and cash flows.

Granite is currently developing and constructing three newfacilities in the U.K. All three projects, North Wales, Kemsley andFerrybridge 2, are expected to be in service in mid-2019. Theseprojects are expected to be financed through debt raised at theproject level. Although these additional debt do not directlyimpact Granite's balance sheet, they increase the overallconsolidated leverage of the family. They also add constructionrisk as well as foreign currency exchange risk to Granite'sbusiness risk profile.

Highly contracted disposal volume and pricing provide a stablefinancial foundation for Granite's earnings and cash flows. Moody'sexpect its disposal volume to remain steady through 2017 and aslight uptick in average pricing, resulting from the contractsrenewed in 2016.

We expect Granite's near-term key credit metrics to be more in linewith its 2016 level. For example, the company's three-year averagecash flow from operation pre-working capital (CFO pre-WC) to debtshould range around high single digits over the next 12-18 months.While key metrics should benefit as Granite continues to reduce itsdebt level through the cash sweep mechanism, cash flows couldweaken as some of Granite's high priced PPAs begin to expire in2019.

Liquidity

Granite's SGL-2 reflects Moody's expectations that the company willmaintain an adequate liquidity over the next 12 months. Moody'sexpects Granite's internal cash flows to be adequate to financeongoing operations and to maintain an adequate cash balance.Construction of the UK projects has already been financed withlong-term debt at the project level. Granite has access to acommitted $145 million credit facility which is currently fullyavailable. The facility has a Debt/EBITDA covenant of 6.75x withwhich the company is currently compliant, although this ratiodeclines to 4.75x starting June 2018. Granite has limited access toalternative sources of liquidity in a stress scenario as its assetsare encumbered.

Rating Outlook

The negative outlook reflects Moody's expectations that Granite'sfinancial ratios may weaken as its higher priced contracts expirein 2019 if commodity prices continue to remain low; as well ashigher business risk during the construction phase of the three newU.K. projects. It also incorporates Moody's expectations that thedisposal segment continues to provide a stable foundation forGranite's earnings and cash flows.

Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Considering the recent downgrade, it is unlikely that Granite'srating will be upgraded over the next 12-18 months. A stabilizationof the outlook would require the company to maintain key creditmetrics such as CFO pre-WC to debt in the high single digits on asustained basis.

Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade

A rating downgrade is likely if Granite's key credit metricsfurther deteriorate such as CFO pre-WC to debt is sustained at themid-single digits. Also, if the company's business risk increasesas its contracted component of the revenue decreases significantly,or if company faces material operational difficulties, unexpectedcapital expenditures or incurs additional debt, a downgrade islikely to be considered.

Granite Acquisition, Inc., through its wholly-owned subsidiaryWheelabrator Technologies, Inc., is the second largestwaste-to-energy (WtE) facility operator in the U.S. Wheelabratorowns and operates 17 WtE facilities, including Ferrybridge 1 in theU.K., operates 4 IPP facilities and 4 ash landfills. It currentlyhas three projects under development or construction in the U.K.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was UnregulatedUtilities and Unregulated Power Companies published in October2014.

GREAT BASIN: Has 465.4M Outstanding Common Shares as of Jan. 27---------------------------------------------------------------On Jan. 26 and 27, 2017, certain holders of the 2016 Notes wereissued shares of Great Basin Scientific, Inc.'s common stockpursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the United States Securities Act of1933, (as amended) in connection with conversions at the electionof the holder pursuant to the terms of the 2016 Notes, as amended. In connection with the conversions, the Company issued 64,550,000shares of common stock. As per the terms of the 2016 Notes, asamended, these pre-installment shares immediately reduced theprincipal amount outstanding of the 2016 Notes by $204,480 at aconversion price between $0.00288 and $0.00360 per share.

As of Jan. 27, 2017, a total principal amount of $2.3 million ofthe 2016 Notes has been converted into shares of common stock. Approximately $72.7 million in note principal remains to beconverted. Restrictions on a total of $9.8 million in theCompany's restricted cash accounts has been released including $6.0million at closing and $3.8 million in early release from therestricted cash accounts. $58.2 million remains in the restrictedcash accounts to have the restrictions removed and become availableto the Company at future dates pursuant to terms of the 2016Notes.

As of Jan. 27, 2017, there are 465,396,774 shares of common stockissued and outstanding.

In connection with the conversions of the 2016 Notes, the exerciseprices of certain of the Company's issued and outstandingsecurities were automatically adjusted to take into account theconversion price of the 2016 Notes. The exercise price of thefollowing security was adjusted as follows.

As of Jan. 27, 2017, the Company has outstanding Series B Warrantsto purchase 36 shares of common stock of the Company. The Series BWarrants include a provision which provides that the exerciseprices of the Series B Warrants will be adjusted in connection withcertain equity issuances by the Company. As a result of theConversions, as of Jan. 27, 2017, the exercise price for the SeriesB Warrants was adjusted from $436,310 to $420,107 per share ofcommon stock.

About Great Basin

Great Basin Scientific is a molecular diagnostic testing companyfocused on the development and commercialization of its patented,molecular diagnostic platform designed to test for infectiousdisease, especially hospital-acquired infections. The Companybelieves that small to medium sized hospital laboratories, thoseunder 400 beds, are in need of simpler and more affordablemolecular diagnostic testing methods. The Company markets a systemthat combines both affordability and ease-of-use, when compared toother commercially available molecular testing methods, which theCompany believes will accelerate the adoption of molecular testingin small to medium sized hospitals. The Company's system includesan analyzer, which it provides for its customers' use withoutcharge in the United States, and a diagnostic cartridge, which theCompany sells to its customers.

Great Basin reported a net loss of $57.9 million in 2015 followinga net loss of $21.7 million in 2014.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Great Basin had $83.40 million in totalassets, $144.9 million in total liabilities, and a totalstockholders' deficit of $61.47 million.

Mantyla McReynolds, LLC, in Salt Lake City, Utah, issued a "goingconcern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financialstatements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that theCompany has incurred substantial losses from operations causingnegative working capital and negative operating cash flows. Theseissues raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as agoing concern, the auditors said.

GREAT BASIN: To Seek Approval of Stock Split at Special Meeting---------------------------------------------------------------Great Basin Scientific, Inc., will hold a special meeting ofshareholders for the purposes of approving a reverse stock split ofthe Company's issued and outstanding shares and an increase in thenumber of authorized shares. In relation thereto, the Board ofDirectors of the Company has set Jan. 31, 2017, as the record datefor shareholders entitled to notice and to vote at the upcomingspecial meeting of shareholders.

About Great Basin

Great Basin Scientific is a molecular diagnostic testing companyfocused on the development and commercialization of its patented,molecular diagnostic platform designed to test for infectiousdisease, especially hospital-acquired infections. The Companybelieves that small to medium sized hospital laboratories, thoseunder 400 beds, are in need of simpler and more affordablemolecular diagnostic testing methods. The Company markets a systemthat combines both affordability and ease-of-use, when compared toother commercially available molecular testing methods, which theCompany believes will accelerate the adoption of molecular testingin small to medium sized hospitals. The Company's system includesan analyzer, which it provides for its customers' use withoutcharge in the United States, and a diagnostic cartridge, which theCompany sells to its customers.

Great Basin reported a net loss of $57.9 million in 2015 followinga net loss of $21.7 million in 2014.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, Great Basin had $83.40 million in totalassets, $144.9 million in total liabilities, and a totalstockholders' deficit of $61.47 million.

Mantyla McReynolds, LLC, in Salt Lake City, Utah, issued a "goingconcern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financialstatements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, citing that theCompany has incurred substantial losses from operations causingnegative working capital and negative operating cash flows. Theseissues raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as agoing concern, the auditors said.

HAGGEN HOLDINGS: Wants Plan Exclusivity Extended to March 8-----------------------------------------------------------HH Liquidation, LLC f/k/a Haggen Holdings, LLC and its affiliatedDebtors request the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District ofDelaware to further extend the exclusive periods during which onlythe Debtors may file a chapter 11 plan and solicit acceptances of aplan, to the latest deadline permitted by the Bankruptcy Code,specifically March 8, 2017 and May 8, 2017, respectively.

The Debtors relate that since commencing these chapter 11 cases,their management and professionals have devoted significantresources to preserving and maximizing the value of their estates,stabilizing business operations, and ensuring a smooth transitionof the Debtors' operations into chapter 11, while also pursuing astrategic divestiture of their assets, a multi-step sale process oftheir business operations, for the benefit of all stakeholders.

The Debtors tell the Court that they have not had sufficient timeto capitalize on their work with interested parties to determinewhether the Debtors can propose a viable chapter 11 plan due to thetasks that they have been consumed with to date in furtherance ofsuch divestitures and other circumstances of these chapter 11cases.

The Debtors also relate that all throughout the Chapter 11 process,they have endeavored to establish and maintain cooperative workingrelationships with their primary creditor constituencies. They arecurrently focusing their efforts on working with interested partiesto bring these chapter 11 cases to an orderly conclusion.

At this stage, the Debtors tell the Court that an extension of theExclusive Periods will allow them to work with these parties todetermine whether they can pursue a consensual chapter 11 plan,which will ultimately be to the benefit of all of the variousconstituencies.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors supports the Debtors'final extension of the Exclusive Periods.

A hearing on the Debtors' request for further exclusivity extensionwill he held on March 9, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. Any objections are dueby February 15, 2017.

About Haggen Holdings

Headquartered in Bellingham, Washington, Haggen was founded in 1933as a single grocery store. From 1933 to 2014, Haggen grew into a30 store family-run grocery chain, with stores located in thenorthwestern United States. From 2011 to 2014, Haggen reduced itsstore base to 18, including a stand-alone pharmacy location.

HAMPSHIRE GROUP: Creditors' Panel Opposes 37.5% Pay Raise for CFO-----------------------------------------------------------------Matt Chiappardi, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reports that theunsecured creditors committee of Hampshire Group, Limited, filedwith the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware anobjection to the Debtor's request to give its chief financialofficer an up to 37.5% raise.

According to Law360, the Committee claimed that the raise wouldessentially be a retention plan for a top-level executive thatdefies Chapter 11 rules.

Law36 relates that Committee said that it doesn't object to theretention of GRL Capital Advisors LLC employee William Drozdowskiat the same salary, about $40,000 per month.

About Hampshire Group

New York-based Hampshire Group, Limited (OTC Markets: HAMP) is a provider of fashion apparel across a broad range of product categories, channels of distribution and price points. As a holding company, the Company operates through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Hampshire Brands, Inc. and Hampshire International, LLC.

Hampshire Group, Limited and two affiliates -- Hampshire Brands andHampshire International -- sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection(Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 16-12634 to 16-12636) on Nov. 23, 2016,to facilitate the orderly wind-down of their business operations. The petitions were signed by Paul Buxbaum, president and chiefexecutive officer.

Hampshire Group disclosed $25.9 million in assets and $41.8 millionin liabilities. Brands listed under $50 million in both assets anddebts. International listed under $50,000 in assets and under $50million in liabilities.

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP and Blank Rome LLP have been tapped as counsel to the Debtors. William Drozdowski of GRL Capital Advisors LLC has also been tapped as the Debtors' chief financial officer.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 has appointed five creditors to servein the official unsecured creditors committee in the case. Gavin/Solmonese LLC serves as financial advisor to the Committee.

HILTZ WASTE: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral Until February 27-------------------------------------------------------------Judge Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Districtof Massachusetts authorized Hiltz Waste Disposal, Inc. to use cashcollateral on an interim basis until February 27, 2017.

The Debtor was authorized to expend cash, deposits and cashequivalents for its operations consistent with and up to theamounts set forth in the Debtor's most recent cash flow projection. The Debtor was also authorized to pay monthly rent of $10,000 toKondelin Road, LLC for its use and occupancy of premises located at24 and 25 Kondelin Road, Gloucester, MA.

The Debtor was directed to make adequate protection payments of$34,000 per month to First Ipswich Bank.

First Ipswich Bank was granted a valid, binding enforceable andperfected replacement and continuing security interest in, and lienon all of the Debtor's pre-petition and post-petition assets, tothe same extent, validity and priority held by First Ipswich Bankas of the petition date. First Ipswich Bank was also granted asuperpriority claim under Section 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtor was directed to submit updated financials for the weekending February 24, 2017 by February 27, 2017, and to give a statusreport regarding the progress of the sale at the continued hearing.

A further hearing on the Debtor's use of cash collateral isscheduled on February 28, 2017 at 10:30 a.m. The deadline for thefiling of objections to the Debtor's further use of cash collateralis set on February 27, 2017.

A full-text copy of the Order, dated January 31, 2017, is availableat https://is.gd/Bb600V

About Hiltz Waste Disposal

Hiltz Waste Disposal, Inc., filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.Mass. Case No. 16-13459) on Sept. 7, 2016. The petition was signedby Deborah S. Hiltz, president. The case is assigned to Judge JoanN. Feeny. At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assetsand liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

ILLINOIS POWER: Genco Wins Confirmation of Chapter 11 Plan----------------------------------------------------------Dynegy Inc. (NYSE: DYN) and Illinois Power Generating Company(Genco), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Dynegy, announcedthat on Jan. 25 the United States Bankruptcy Court for the SouthernDistrict of Texas, Houston Division, confirmed the Genco Chapter 11plan of reorganization. The plan confirmation clears the way forGenco to emerge from Chapter 11 and complete its financialrestructuring, likely within the next few weeks.

After the confirmation hearing on Jan. 25, the Court confirmed thePlan, ruling that Genco had met all requirements to confirm thePlan.

The Plan significantly reduces Genco's indebtedness and improvesits liquidity by converting approximately $825 million of seniordebt into a combination of senior debt and equity of Dynegy andcash.

The Plan provides that, among other things, on account of eachAllowed Noteholder Claim:

On the Effective Date, except as otherwise provided for in thePlan, the Genco Notes shall be deemed extinguished, cancelled andof no further force or effect and the holders of Allowed NoteholderClaims shall only be entitled to receive the treatment providedunder the Plan.

The Plan provides that all of the Debtor's executory contracts andunexpired leases, except as set forth in the Plan, shall be deemedassumed as of the Effective Date, subject to the terms set forththerein. The Plan also provides that, for each of the Debtor'sexecutory contracts to be assumed, the Debtor shall designate aproposed cure. The deadline to object to a proposed cure, or anyother matter relating to assumption of such executory contracts andunexpired leases, has passed.

Assuming distributions under the Plan are made on the EffectiveDate, as of such date, in addition to (i) the New Dynegy Notes tobe issued in connection with the Plan and (ii) 117,305,185 sharesof issued and outstanding Dynegy Common Stock, approximately8,653,000 shares of Dynegy Common Stock will be reserved forissuance upon exercise of the New Dynegy Warrants.

A copy of the Confirmation Order is available athttps://is.gd/WHqFnp

About Illinois Power

Illinois Power Generating Company is an electric generationsubsidiary of Illinois Power Resources, LLC, which is an indirectwholly-owned subsidiary of Dynegy Inc. The Company isheadquarteredin Houston, Texas and were incorporated in Illinois in March 2000.It owns and operates a merchant generation business in Illinois.The Company has an 80% ownership interest in Electric Energy,Inc.,which it consolidates for financialreporting purposes. EEI operates merchant electric generationfacilities in Illinois and FERC-regulated transmission facilitiesin Illinois and Kentucky.The Company also consolidates itswholly-owned subsidiary, Coffeen and Western Railroad Company, forfinancial reporting purposes.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $550 million in total assets,$986 million in total liabilities, and a total deficit of $436million.

IMH FINANCIAL: Redeems 196,278 Shares from CEO Lawrence Bain------------------------------------------------------------IMH Financial Corporation redeemed 196,278 shares of the commonstock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share, issued to LawrenceD. Bain, the Company's chief executive officer, which were part ofan 850,000 restricted share grant awarded to Mr. Bain pursuant to aRestricted Stock Award Agreement entered into between the Companyand Mr. Bain, dated as of June 1, 2015. The Company paid Mr. Bain$337,599 for the redeemed shares.

The shares were redeemed by the Company, upon the approval of theCompensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company,pursuant to an election made by Mr. Bain under Section 83(b) of theInternal Revenue Code of 1986 and the Award Agreement pursuant towhich the parties agreed to make arrangements for the satisfactionof tax withholding requirements associated with the stock award.

About IMH Financial

Scottsdale, Ariz.-based IMH Financial Corporation was formed fromthe conversion of IMH Secured Loan Fund, LLC, or the Fund, aDelaware limited liability company, on June 18, 2010. Theconversion was effected following a consent solicitation processpursuant to which approval was obtained from a majority of themembers of the Fund to effect the Conversion Transactions andinvolved (i) the conversion of the Fund from a Delaware limitedliability company into a Delaware corporation named IMH FinancialCorporation, and (ii) the acquisition by the Company of all of theoutstanding shares of the manager of the Fund Investors MortgageHoldings Inc., or the Manager, as well as all of the outstandingmembership interests of a related entity, IMH Holdings LLC, orHoldings on June 18, 2010.

IMH Financial reported a net loss attributable to commonshareholders of $18.90 million on $32.49 million of total revenuefor the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net lossattributable to common shareholders of $39.46 million on $31.4million of total revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.

As of Sept. 30, 2016, IMH Financial had $172.77 million in totalassets, $109.49 million in total liabilities, $31.49 million inredeemable convertible preferred stock and $31.77 million in totalstockholders' equity.

INTERNATIONAL SHIPHOLDING: Sale of Vessel to Oslo for $3.3M Okayed------------------------------------------------------------------Judge Stuart M. Bernstein of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theSouthern District of New York authorized the sale by InternationalShipholding Corp. and its affiliates of one of their vessels, theOslo Wave (IMO: 9190092), to Oslo Bulk Holding Pte. Ltd. for$3,300,000.

The sale is free of clear of all liens, claims, and encumbrances.

The sale and transfer of the Vessel to the Buyer will occur as soonas practicable and not later than Feb. 28, 2017, with the effectivedate of the sale and transfer of the Vessel to the Buyer to be Jan.1, 2017, as reflected in the APA.

Notwithstanding anything contained in the Motion, the effectivedate of the rejection of the Bareboat Charter will be the ClosingDate, provided, however, that notwithstanding any other provisionsof the Order, the Motion or the APA, the Debtors will seek toenforce any and all rights that arise in their favor under Sections16 and 17 of the Bareboat Charter solely with respect toliabilities arising prior to the Closing Date.

Oslo Bulk Holding PTE, Ltd. ("Charterer") waives any and all claimsagainst the Debtors and the reorganized Debtors, the Vessel, andthe proceeds of the sale of the Vessel arising from the rejectionof the Bareboat Charter.

The Debtors admit, acknowledge, stipulate and agree thatimmediately upon the Closing, Capital One will have a valid,perfected, binding, non-avoidable, and enforceable first prioritysecurity interest in, and liens on, all of the proceeds from thesale of the Vessel, subject only to the priming lien of the DIPLenders, capped at $1,250,000 with respect to the Capital OneCollateral as set forth in the Final DIP Order.

Notwithstanding anything contained in the Motion, the APA or theSale Documents: (a) On the Closing Date, $1,250,000 in saleproceeds will be deposited into a segregated account of LCIShipholdings, Inc., and any and all liens and/or security interestsagainst the Vessel shall attach to such proceeds in the samepriority as the liens and/or security interests against the Vessel,such proceeds will only be released (i) pending upon further orderof the Bankruptcy Court authorizing the withdrawal of such funds,free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or (ii) pursuant tothe terms of the Final DIP Order; and (b) Within 1 business day ofthe Closing Date, the remaining $2,050,000 in sale proceeds will bedistributed to Capital One free and clear of all liens andencumbrances in partial satisfaction of its secured claim asdescribed.

At or prior to the Closing, Charterer will certify that it hasoperated the Vessel in accordance with the Bareboat Charter and tothe best of its knowledge, there are no maritime or other liensasserted against the Vessel which arose as a result ofCharterer’s possession or operation of the Vessel.

Notwithstanding the possible applicability of Bankruptcy Rules6004(h) and 6006(d), the order will be immediately effective andenforceable upon its entry.

About International Shipholding

International Shipholding Corp. filed a Chapter 11 petition(Bankr.S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-12220) on July 31, 2016. Its affiliatedDebtors also filed separate Chapter 11 petitions. The petitionswere signed by Manuel G. Estrada, vice president and chieffinancial officer.

International Shipholding Corp. was engaged in waterborne cargotransportation and maintained a diversified customer base withemphasis on medium and long term contracts. ISH was founded in1947when the Johnsen family purchased a Liberty Ship after theestablishment of the War Ship Act of 1946 and became a publiccompany in 1979. Through its Debtor and non-Debtor subsidiaries,International Shipholding now operates a diversified fleet of 21U.S. and foreign flag vessels that provide domestic andinternational maritime transportation services to commercial andgovernmental customers primarily under medium to long-termcontracts. As of the Petition Date, International Shipholdingmaintained offices in Mobile, Alabama, New Orleans, Louisiana, NewYork, New York, and Tampa, Florida, as well as a network ofagencies in major cities worldwide.

The Debtors disclosed total assets at $305.1 million and totaldebts at $226.8 million as of March 31, 2016.

William K. Harrington, the U.S. Trustee for the Southern Districtof New York, on Sept. 1, 2016, appointed three creditors to serveon the official committee of unsecured creditors of InternationalShipholding Corporation. The committee hires Pachulski Stang Ziehl& Jones LLP as counsel, and AMA Capital Partners, LLC as financialadvisor.

On Dec. 28, 2016, the Debtors filed their first amended jointChapter 11 plan of reorganization. Class 7 general unsecuredcreditors are expected to recover 7% of their claims, according tothe filing.

IRVIN & ASSOCIATES: Unsecureds to Get $250 Monthly in 1 Yr. at 2% ------------------------------------------------------------------Irvin & Associates, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court forthe Northern District of Texas a disclosure statement dated Jan.30, 2017, referring to the Debtor's plan of reorganization.

Class 4 Allowed General Unsecured Claims is estimated to beapproximately $3,000 and is impaired by the Plan. The Debtor hasnot filed claims and objections and may object to certain of theunsecured claims. The Plan intends to pay the Allowed UnsecuredClaims in full. Each holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claimwill be paid their pro rata share of $250 a month over one year atan interest rate of 2% per annum as of the Confirmation Date,starting on the 15th of the first month following the EffectiveDate.

Insider claims are paid nothing under this Plan.

The Debtor will fund the Plan from ongoing operations and then fromthe sale of the final piece of real property. The Debtor will keepcurrent its post-petition payables.

Irvin & Associates, Inc., owns several tracts of real property.They all have been encumbered by liens to Steadfast Funding. TheDebtor fell behind on its payments to Steadfast prior to the filingof this case. The Debtor's primary business was servicing poolsbut the Debtor has not been able to do as much work because theowners have been in poor health over the last few years. Theproperties were also impacted by the ATMOS pipeline that runsacross one of the properties that has negatively impacted the valueof the property. The Debtor has claims against ATMOS for thedamage to the property and its loss in value.

JACK ROSS: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended To February 20---------------------------------------------------------------Judge Bruce T. Beesley the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Districtof Nevada extended the exclusive periods during which Jack RossIndustries, LLC d/b/a Big Shot Indoor Range and as Jack RossAmmunition may file and obtain confirmation of its Plan ofReorganization through February 20, 2017.

The Troubled Company Reporter had earlier reported that the Debtorsought for exclusivity extension since it was still workingstabilize its operations and improve profitability. The Debtoralso contended that it requires further time to prepare adequateinformation and formulate a plan of reorganization.

About Jack Ross Industries, LLC

Jack Ross Industries, LLC, based in Reno, NV, filed a Chapter 11petition (Bankr. Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 16-51053) on August 24,2016. The petition was signed by Christopher Parker, managingmember. The Debtor is represented by Alan R. Smith, Esq., at theLaw Offices of Alan R. Smith. The case is assigned to Judge BruceT. Beesley. The Debtor disclosed $168,100 in assets and $1.06million in liabilities.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed inthe case.

JEFF BENFIELD: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis--------------------------------------------------------------Judge J. Craig Whitley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the WesternDistrict of North Carolina authorized Jeff Benfield Nursery, Inc.,to use cash collateral on an interim basis.

The Debtor was authorized to use cash collateral in the ordinarycourse of business only for ordinary and necessary businessexpenses specified in the Budget beginning on January 25, 2017 andcontinuing through February 21, 2017.

The approved Budget provides for total operating expenses ofapproximately $251,642 for the month of January 2017 and $235,350for the month of February 2017.

The Debtor's Lenders were granted valid, attached, choate,enforceable, perfected and continuing security interests in, andliens upon all post-petition assets of the Debtor of the samecharacter and type, to the same extent and validity as the liensand encumbrances of the Lenders attached to the Debtor's assetspre-petition.

The Debtor was directed to provide a budget-to-actual cash usagecomparison report to the Lenders and the Bankruptcy Administratoron or before February 15, 2017.

A final hearing on the use of Cash Collateral will be held onFebruary 21, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Fifth Interim Order, dated January 31,2017, is available at https://is.gd/tmXrTM

About Jeff Benfield Nursery, Inc.

Headquartered in Marion, North Carolina, Jeff Benfield Nursery,Inc., operates a commercial wholesale nursery, growing trees,shrubs, and similar agricultural products on approximately 1,000acres in McDowell and Avery Counties. The Debtor, which was formedin 1989, has 30 regular employees and additional seasonal workers.

Jeff Benfield Nursery, Inc. filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr.W.D.N.C. Case No. 16-40375) on Aug. 26, 2016. The petition wassigned by Jeffrey L. Benfield, president. The case is assigned toJudge J. Craig Whitley. The Debtor is represented by Richard S.Wright, Esq., at Moon Wright & Houston, PLLC. The Debtor estimatedassets at $10 million to $50 million and liabilities at $1 millionto $10 million at the time of the filing.

The Company previously sought bankruptcy protection in 2009 (CaseNo. 09-40311), and its plan of reorganization was confirmed in anorder entered on June 10, 2010.

JOHN PUESHEL: Sale of Jersey City Property to Shah Approved-----------------------------------------------------------Judge John K. Sherwood of the Bankruptcy Court for the District ofNew Jersey authorized John P. Pueshel's sale of real propertylocated at 382 Baldwin Avenue, Jersey City, New Jersey, to HastinShah.

A hearing was held on Jan. 31, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims, interests andencumbrances.

Any and all unpaid property taxes, municipal charges for waterand/or sewer, and the First Mortgage Lien owed to Ocwen LoanServicing, LLC ("Paid Liens") will be satisfied at the closing forthe sale of the property.

The Debtor will be permitted to pay the Debtor's Professionalstheir allowed fees from the proceeds of the sale of the property atclosing ("Professional's Fees").

The proceeds from the sale of the property after payment of thePaid Liens, the Professional's Fees, and closing costs will bedeposited into the Debtor's Debtor-in-Possession Account.

KARHOO INC: Sale of Assets to Flit Technologies for $ 500K Approved-------------------------------------------------------------------Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theSouthern District of New York authorized the sale by Paul Cooper,the authorized foreign representative of Karhoo, Inc. andaffiliates, of the Debtors' right, title, and interest in the USAssets to Flit Technologies Ltd. for a cash consideration of$500,000; equity consideration in the amount of 10% of thepreferred ordinary shares of the Purchaser.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Jan. 31, 2017.

The sale of the US Assets is free and clear of all liens, claims,encumbrances and other interests.

The Foreign Representative will file a notice or notices containinga list of contracts to be assumed and assigned with proposed cureamounts, which will include procedures on objections to theproposed cure amounts. The Foreign Representative will serve theAssumption Notice by email upon these contract counterparties. Objections to proposed cure amounts will be due within 7 days ofservice of the Assumption Notice. If there are no objections orobjections are resolved, these contracts will be deemed assumed andassigned under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code as of the date ofthe Order. If there are any unresolved objections, the ForeignRepresentative either will not assume and assign such contract, orwill schedule a hearing to resolve such objection. If thoseobjections are resolved, these contracts will be deemed assumed andassigned under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code as of the date ofthe Order.

The 14-day stay provided for in Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and6006(d) will be, and is, waived in connection with the Order.

About Karhoo

Karhoo, Inc., a London-based start-up that offered a taxi-bookingapp as an alternative to Uber/Lyft, sought Chapter 15 bankruptcyprotection in New York to seek recognition of its insolvencyproceedings in the UK.

Founded in November 2014 in London, England, by Daniel Ishag,Karhoo Inc., et al., are part of a group of companies that offereda ride comparison app" as an alternative to the Uber/Lyft"ride-sharing app" model. Instead of maintaining its own fleet ofdrivers and cars, Karhoo contracted with local dispatchers andfleet owners, providing customers with a choice of vehicles andprices through its mobile application.

Karhoo entered into approximately 700 contracts with fleet ownersand approximately 21 contracts with dispatchers in the cities inwhich it did business, primarily London and several other citiesinEngland.

In total, Karhoo employed approximately 200 employees, the vastmajority of whom have been laid off or made redundant in recentweeks.

KOHN FUNERAL: Wants Court Approval for Cash Collateral Use----------------------------------------------------------Kohn Funeral Home, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theSouthern District of Illinois for authorization to use cashcollateral.

The Debtor owes its secured creditors First Community Bank XeniaFlora and Flora Bank & Trust, at least $653,412.15, which includesprincipal, interest, fees and costs.

The Debtor relates that Flora Bank & Trust did not attempt toperfect a lien upon the cash collateral, and that First CommunityBank Xenia Flora attempted to perfect a lien upon the cashcollateral, but that lien may be avoidable.

The Debtor further relates that it requires the use of cashcollateral to continue its business operations and to pay itsregular daily expenses, including employees' wages, contract labor,utilities, taxes, and the other costs of conducting business.

The Debtor tells the Court that First Community Bank's interest, ifvalid, will be adequately protected through the payment of theBank's loan in the ordinary course of business, and the granting ofa replacement lien to First Community Bank in its respectivecollateral.

March 8, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. is fixed for the hearing on finalapproval of the disclosure statement and for the hearing onconfirmation of the plan and related matters at US CourthouseCourtroom 6A 400 E. 9th St. Kansas City, MO.

Feb. 28, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. by telephone is the date for statushearing to discuss any confirmation issues thatshould arise.

Feb. 24, 2017 is the deadline for filing with the Court objectionsto the disclosure statement or plan confirmation; and submittingballots accepting or rejecting the plan.

As previously reported, Class 3 under the plan includes all AllowedGeneral Unsecured Nonpriority Claims. This class includes$1,457,438 of claims, however, the Debtor would dispute and requirestrict proof of all unsecured claims with the exception of BerniceWoodward's claim of $300,000, which is an Allowed UnsecuredNon-Priority Claim. The Allowed Unsecured Non-priority Creditorsshall receive distributions from the sale of the real estate onceClasses 1 and 2 are paid in full.

Lakewood Development Company LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcypetition (Bankr. w.D.MO. Case No. 16-50425) on October 17, 2016.Hon. Cynthia A. Norton presides over the case. Krigel & Krigel, PCrepresents the Debtor as counsel. The Debtor disclosed totalassetsof $4.20 million and total liabilities of $2.42 million. Thepetition was signed by Jerry AlanSigtist, managing partner.

The Debtors expect that the effective date of the Plan will occuras soon as all conditions precedent to the Plan have beensatisfied.

Although the Debtors are targeting occurrence of the Effective Datewithin the next 30 days, the Debtors can make no assurances as towhen, or ultimately if, the Plan will become effective. It is alsopossible that technical amendments could be made to the Plan.

The Plan contemplates a restructuring of the Debtors through:

(a) rights offerings in the aggregate amount of $530 million backstopped by certain of the creditors and open to all holders of allowed LINN Second Lien Notes Claims and all holders of allowed LINN Unsecured Notes Claims;

(b) a full recovery for the LINN Lenders consisting of:

(i) a $500 million cash payment from the proceeds of the LINN Rights Offerings and other cash payments from existing cash on hand,

(ii) an exit facility in the aggregate amount of $1.7 billion, or

(iii) non-conforming term notes issued to those LINN Lenders who elect not to participate in the LINN Exit Facility;

(c) the issuance of common stock in the reorganized Company -- a new entity, the form of which shall be determined on or before the effective date of the Plan -- to holders of the LINN Second Lien Notes Claims and the LINN Unsecured Notes Claims;

(d) the right to participate in the LINN Rights Offerings for eligible holders of LINN Second Lien Notes Claims and LINN Unsecured Notes Claims;

(e) a pro rata cash payment of $30 million to LINN Second Lien Noteholders;

(f) a full recovery for holders of Allowed LINN Convenience Class Claims and holders of LINN Allowed General Unsecured Claims who elect to reduce their LINN Allowed General Unsecured Claims to $2,500; and

(h) a pro rata cash distribution from the LINN GUC Cash Distribution Pool to the holders of Allowed LINN General Unsecured Claims.

Unless otherwise specified, the treatment set forth in the Plan andConfirmation Order will be in full satisfaction of all claimsagainst and interests in the Debtors, which will be discharged onthe Effective Date. All of the Company's existing funded debt andequity will be extinguished by the Plan.

Capital Structure

Pursuant to the Plan, each of the Company's units outstandingimmediately before the Effective Date -- including any options andwarrants to purchase such units -- will be cancelled and of nofurther force or effect after the Effective Date.

As of October 31, 2016, there were 355,032,380 units outstanding.Under the Plan, the Debtors' new organizational documents willbecome effective on the Effective Date. The Company's neworganizational documents will authorize the Company to issue newequity, certain of which will be issued to holders of allowedclaims pursuant to the Plan on the Effective Date. In addition, onthe Effective Date, the Company will enter into a registrationrights agreement with certain equityholders.

Settlement, Releases and Exculpations

The Plan incorporates an integrated compromise and settlement ofclaims to achieve a beneficial and efficient resolution of theChapter 11 Cases. Unless otherwise specified, the settlement,distributions, and other benefits provided under the Plan,including the releases and exculpation provisions included therein,are in full satisfaction of all claims and causes of action thatcould be asserted.

The Plan provides releases and exculpations for the benefit of theDebtors, certain of the Debtors' claimholders, other parties ininterest and various parties related thereto, each in theircapacity as such, from various claims and causes of action, asfurther set forth in Article VIII of the Plan.

A copy of the Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization ofLinn Energy, LLC and Its Debtor Affiliates Other Than LinnAcquisition Company, LLC and Berry Petroleum Company, LLC, isavailable at https://is.gd/XRleIC

The Office of the U.S. Trustee has appointed five creditors of LinnEnergy LLC to serve on the official committee of unsecuredcreditors. The Committee tapped Mark I. Bane, Esq., and Keith H.Wofford, Esq., at Ropes & Gray LLP; and Moelis & Company LLC asinvestment banker. It also retained as Texas Oil & Gas Counsel,John P. Melko, Esq., David S. Elder, Esq., and Michael K. Riordan,Esq., at Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP.

The Debtor owes MidCap Financial LLC approximately $6,729,461. Thedebt is secured with a first-priority lien on substantially all ofthe Debtors' assets. The Debtor is also indebted to CardiovascularCare Group in the amount of $104,000,000, pursuant to a DemandNote, which is due upon demand and is unsecured.

The Debtor was indebted to MedCath Finance Company by virtue of aReal Estate Note and Loan Agreement. The debt, which has anoutstanding amount of $21,763,903, is currently held byCardiovascular Care Group. The indebtedness is secured by amortgage in Louisiana Medical Center and Heart Hospital's acutecare hospital and two medical office buildings.

The Debtors tell the Court that to continue to operate, payordinary expenses and fund the costs of the Chapter 11 case, theDebtors need to continue to rely on funding from the DIP Lender, ortheoretically, a third party. The Debtors further tell the Courtthat given the nature of and risks associated with the Debtors'business, and that the Debtors do not have material unencumberedassets, they do not believe that third-party debtor-in-possessionfinancing is available to them.

The Debtors relate that under the DIP Loan Agreement, the DIPLender is committed to lend to the Debtor, from time to time, up to$4.2 million, with $1 million being funded prior to the entry ofthe Court's Final Order. The obligation will bear interest on itsdaily balance, at the rate of 7.5% per annum.

The proposed Budget, covering the period beginning February 5, 2017and ending July 30, 2017, provides for total operatingdisbursements of $11,824,572, and total non-operating disbursementsof $8,252,093.

The DIP Loan will mature on the earliest to occur of:

(a) July 31, 2017;

(b) the date of the indefeasible payment in full of the Loansand other Obligations;

(c) 35 days after the Filing Date, if the Final Order has notbeen entered by the Bankruptcy Court by such date;

(d) the date upon which the Interim Order expires, unless theFinal Order will have been entered and became effective as of suchdate;

(e) the date of entry of an order of the Bankruptcy Courtconfirming a plan of reorganization in the Bankruptcy Case that hasnot been consented to by the Lender and fails to provide for thepayment in full in cash of all Obligations under the DIP Agreementand the other Loan Documents on the effective date of such plan;

(f) the date of the closing of a sale of all or substantiallyall of the Borrowers' assets pursuant to Section 363 of theBankruptcy Code;

(g) the date of entry of an order of the Bankruptcy Courtconverting the Bankruptcy Case to a case under Chapter 7 of theBankruptcy Code or dismissing the Bankruptcy Case; and

(h) if a plan of reorganization that has been consented to bythe Lender or that provides for the payment in full in cash of allof the Obligations under this Agreement and the other LoanDocuments has been confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, the earlierof the effective date of such plan of reorganization or thethirtieth day after the date of entry of such confirmation order.

The Debtors propose to grant MidCap Financial replacement liens inthe same collateral generated post-petition in which MidCapFinancial has a security interest pre-petition. The Debtorsfurther propose to grant MidCap Financial adequate protectionconsisting of the existing value of MidCap Financial's collateralin excess of the Midcap debt plus the payment of adequateprotection payments to MidCap equal to 25% of all accountsreceivables collected by the Debtors post-petition.

The Debtors contend that MedCare Investment Fund V, as the DIPLender, will be granted liens in all of the Debtor's assets subjectonly to existing liens and security interests, except that suchliens granted to the DIP Lender will be senior to the existing lienand security interests of Cardiovascular Care Group, which issubordinated to the MidCap liens in the real property owned by theDebtors.

The Debtors further contend that they will pay MidCap Financial theprofessional fees and expenses it incurs, subject to a 10-dayobjection period by the Debtors, the U.S. Trustee, or the Committeeafter delivery of a statement of fees and expenses.

The Carve-Out consists of: all unpaid fees of the Clerk of Courtand the U.S. Trustee and Professional Fees of professionalsretained by the Debtors and any Committee in an amount not toexceed the amounts in the Cash Collateral Budget.

The Debtors believe that that the terms and conditions of theproposed DIP Loans are reasonable under the circumstances,favorable to the Debtors, and could not be replicated in themarketplace. The Debtors assert that in the absence of immediateaccess to the DIP Loans from the DIP Lender, the Debtors will beunable to bear the costs and expenses of the Chapter 11 Case, thegoing concern value of its estate will rapidly deteriorate, andserious and irreparable harm to the Debtors, the estate, and otherstakeholders will occur, thus preventing the Debtors from realizingtheir chapter 11 objectives.

Originally licensed for 58 beds in 2003, as a result of itsphysical and strategic expansion in 2007, the Hospital is now afull-service 132-bed acute care hospital with seven operatingrooms, three catheterization laboratories, and a 24-hour heartattack intervention center dedicated to providing advanced medicaltreatment and compassionate care to patients and familiesthroughout the North Shore area.

LMCHH estimated assets in the range of $1 million to $10 millionand liabilities of up to $500 million. LHH estimated assets in therange of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities of $100 millionto $500 million.

LODGE HOLDINGS: Ch. 11 Trustee Wants to Use Cash Until April 2017-----------------------------------------------------------------Sheena R. Aebig, Chapter 11 Trustee of Lodge Holdings Company andits affiliated Debtors, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theWestern District of Washington for authorization to use cashcollateral through April 2017.

The Chapter 11 Trustee's Motion is scheduled for hearing on March3, 2017. The deadline for the filing of objections to the Chapter11 Trustee's Motion is set on Feb. 24, 2017.

The Chapter 11 Trustee relates that the entities known to her whoassert or may assert an interest in cash collateral include:

(1) the United States of America, in behalf of the InternalRevenue Service, on account of federal tax liens;

(2) the State of Washington, on account of state tax liens;

(3) CBC Partners I, LLC; and

(4) American Express Bank.

The Chapter 11 Trustee further relates that from incompletedocumentation currently available to her, it is also possible thatthe following entities could assert an interest in cash collateral,but she currently has no evidence of the perfection of any securityinterest or lien by these entities:

(1) Gregg Chavez (Mill Creek Lodge, Downtown Lodge, GreenwoodLodge0;

(2) Honey Locust Holdings, LLC (Greenwood Lodge); and

(3) Donna and Jerry Louthain (Mukilteo Lodge).

The Chapter 11 Trustee tells the Court that the purpose of theproposed use of cash collateral is to fund the continued operationof the Debtors' business for so long as the Chapter 11 Trusteedeems such operation to be advisable, and to fund the reasonableexpenses of administration of the cases, including the Chapter 11Trustee's investigation of the Debtors' financial affairs andbusiness, and assessment of options for realization of best valuefrom the assets, to benefit creditors. The Chapter 11 Trusteefurther tells the Court that if she is not permitted reasonable useof cash collateral, she believes the shutdown of the businesseswill be necessary as there is no known source to fund operationsother than the cash flow generated by the businesses themselves.

The Chapter 11 Trustee's proposed Budget provides for totaloperating expenses in the amount of $673,046 for February, $754,260for March, and $744,389 for April.

The Chapter 11 Trustee wants the subordination of replacement liensof secured creditors in cash collateral, to allowed professionalcompensation, not to exceed the following estimated amounts:

Feb. 2017 March 2017 April 2017

Trustee $25,000 $20,000 $20,000

Trustee's $25,000 $20,000 $20,000 counsel

Trustee's $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 accountant

The Chapter 11 Trustee proposes to grant CBC Partners and the IRSwith replacement liens in the same collateral, including cashcollateral, and their proceeds, with the same validity, priority,and enforceability as existed pre-petition.

LUKE'S LOCKER: Wants to Use Nike Cash Collateral------------------------------------------------Debtor Luke's Locker Incorporated asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Courtfor the Eastern District of Texas for authorization to use cashcollateral.

The Debtor and its affiliated debtors 2L Austin, LLC, and TheQuality Lifestyle I, Ltd.'s only secured creditor is Nike. Nikehas a lien against all of the Debtors' assets to secure payment ofa promissory note in the principal amount of $2 million. Nike'scollateral includes inventory, cash, and the proceeds and productsof both.

In order to incentivize vendors to ship inventory to the Debtor oncredit so that it can operate the Plano, Dallas, Fort Worth, andSouthlake stores, the Debtor filed a DIP Motion, proposing to granteach vendor a first-priority lien on any inventory that such vendorprovides, as well as their proceeds and profits, provided that thevendor agrees to permit the Debtor to use its cash collateral inthe ordinary course of the Debtor's business.

The Debtor contends that Nike's lien does not extend to propertythat the Debtor acquires after the Petition Date if the Debtor doesnot use Nike's cash collateral to acquire such property. TheDebtor further contends that any inventory it acquires on creditunder any order granting the DIP Motion will not be subject toNike's lien.

The Debtor relates that it needs to use Nike's alleged cashcollateral to continue the operation of its business. The Debtorfurther relates that without the funds to continue the operation ofits Luke's Locker stores in Dallas, Plano, Fort Worth, andSouthlake, it will not be able to pay payroll and other directoperating expenses and obtain goods and services needed to carry onits business in a manner that will avoid irreparable harm to all ofthe Debtors' estates.

The Debtor's proposed Budget for the months of January throughDecember, provides for total store operating expenses of$4,352,823, and total corporate expenses of $488,700.

The Debtor proposes to provide the following adequate protection toNike:

(a) super-priority claims senior to all other postpetitionsuper-priority claims, subject to a carve-out for professional feesand fees owed to the United States Trustee, and any first-priorityliens granted to any trade vendors pursuant to a DIP Facility;

(b) replacement liens on all property currently owned or lateracquired by the Debtor, subordinate only to the liens of anyapplicable taxing authority, any first-priority liens granted totrade vendors pursuant to a DIP Facility, and the carve-out; and

(c) monthly adequate protection payments in the amount of$7,500 beginning in April 2017 through July 2017, and increasing to$15,000 per month thereafter.

The Debtor and its affiliated debtors 2L Austin, LLC, and TheQuality Lifestyle I, Ltd., operate retail stores throughout Texas,known as Luke's Locker, that specialize in running and fitnessapparel, footwear, and other related goods, with a particular focuson providing excellent customer service. They also providetraining programs (running and walking) for their customers, andthey help sponsor and host numerous running and walking eventsthroughout the year, including everything from charitable 5Ks tofree weekly social runs from the stores. Luke's Locker is arecognized leader in its industry, having won numerous D MagazineReaders' Choice and Best of Big D awards throughout the years.

Luke's Locker's origins go back as far as 1970, when Don Lucas wasa Dallas attorney and running enthusiast. The problem then wasthat shoes specially designed for running were not generallyavailable in Dallas. So Mr. Lucas contacted a company in Oregoncalled Blue Ribbon Sports. Blue Ribbon sold him shoes for his ownuse, and he, in turn, sold more of their shoes to fellow Dallasrunners out of the trunk of his car. Blue Ribbon Sports officiallychanged its name to Nike, Inc. in May 1971.

Mr. Lucas's shoe business moved from the trunk of his car, to hisgarage, and eventually into the first Luke's Locker on Oak Lawn inDallas. In addition to running shoes, Luke's Locker carriesworkout gear, sportswear, cross training shoes, track and crosscountry spikes, tennis shoes, and a host of related accessories. Today Luke's Locker has locations in Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth,Highland Village, Houston, Katy, Plano, Southlake, White Rock Lakeand The Woodlands. There is also a central distribution warehouseand administrative office in Dallas.

MAINE STATE PROPERTIES: Taps CBRE to Sell Biddeford Property------------------------------------------------------------Maine State Properties, LLC seeks permission from the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the Maine to employ Gregory W. Boulos, ofCBRE, The Boulos Company, to assist the Debtor in selling the realestate located at 145 Main Street, Biddeford, Maine, consisting of0.08+- acres of land improved with a 13,034+- sf buildingcontaining 19 residential units and 1 commercial unit.

The Debtor proposes to pay Mr. Boulos and CBRE, The Boulos Company6.5% commission from the sale proceeds.

Mr. Boulos attests that neither he nor any members of his officeholds or represents any interest adverse to the estate.

MAXUS ENERGY: Benjamin Moore Asks Court to Deny Plan Disclosures----------------------------------------------------------------Benjamin Moore & Co. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Delaware a joinder to the objection of the OfficialCommittee of Unsecured Creditors regarding the disclosure statementfor the chapter 11 liquidation plan filed by Maxus EnergyCorporation, and its debtor affiliates.

The Debtors have said they will seek the Bankruptcy Court'sapproval of a settlement with YPF S.A., parent of YPF Holdings,Inc., which purchased Maxus in the 1990s.

On June 15, 2016, the parties reached the settlement of theDebtors' claims against YPF and its affiliates and executed asettlement agreement on June 17, 2016, pursuant to which (a) YPFagreed to pay $130 million to the Debtors and their Estates uponthe satisfaction of certain conditions, and (b) YPF Holdings agreedto provide debtor-in-possession financing in the amount of $63.1million to the Debtors, of which $34.35 million is subordinate inpayment to all general unsecured claims. In exchange, the Debtorsagreed to, among other things, release their claims against the YPFEntities, and prosecute the Chapter 11 Cases in accordance withcertain case milestones set forth in the DIP Agreement.

Moore complains that the disclosure statement fails to provideadequate information to enable a creditor to make an informedjudgment about whether to vote to accept or reject the Plan and thePlan is not confirmable for multiple reasons.

Moreover, Moore says the Plan structure presupposes approval of thesettlement agreement but fails to provide an alternative in theevent the settlement agreement is not approved.

Moore also shares the concerns expressed by the Creditors'Committee in the Committee Objection, and therefore joins andincorporates by reference all points and arguments made by theCreditors' Committee in their objection.

For these reasons, Moore asks the Court to deny approval of thedisclosure statement.

Maxus Energy Corporation and four of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 (Bankr. D.Del., Case No. 16-11501) on June 17, 2016. The Debtors intend touse the breathing spell afforded by the Bankruptcy Code to decidewhether their existing environmental remediation operations andoiland gas operations can be restructured as a sustainable,stand-alone enterprise.

The Debtors have engaged Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP aslocal counsel, Morrison & Foerster LLP as general bankruptcycounsel, Zolfo Cooper, LLC as financial advisor and Prime ClerkLLC as claims and noticing agent, all are subject to theBankruptcyCourt's approval.

The Debtors hired Keen-Summit Capital Partners LLC as real estatebroker. The Debtors also engaged Hilco Steambank to market andsell their internet protocol numbers and other internet numberresources, and EnergyNet.com to market and sell the Debtors'rights, title, and interest in and to the oil and gas properties.

On July 7, 2016, the United States Trustee for the District ofDelaware filed Notice of Appointment of Committee of UnsecuredCreditors. The Committee selected Schulte Roth & Zabell LLP ascounsel, and Cole Schotz as Delaware co-counsel. Berkeley ResearchGroup, LLC, serves as financial advisor for the Committee.

MEMORIAL PRODUCTION: Moody's Cuts PDR to D-PD on Bankr. Filing--------------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service downgraded Memorial Production PartnersLP's Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to D-PD from Ca-PD/LD,following the company's announcement in January that it hasvoluntarily filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the UnitedStates Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court forthe Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.

The downgrade of MEMP's PDR to D-PD is a result of the bankruptcyfiling. MEMP's other ratings have been affirmed, which reflectsMoody's view on the potential overall family recovery and seniornotes recovery.

Shortly following this rating action, Moody's will withdraw allratings for the company consistent with Moody's practice forcompanies operating under the purview of the bankruptcy courtswherein information flow typically becomes much more limited.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was GlobalIndependent Exploration and Production Industry published inDecember 2011.

Memorial Production Partners LP, headquartered in Houston, TX is apublicly traded partnership engaged in the acquisition, productionand development of oil and natural gas properties in the UnitedStates.

MERCHANTS BANKCARD: Cash Collateral Motion Withdrawn----------------------------------------------------Judge Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Districtof Massachusetts acknowledged and ordered the withdrawal ofMerchant Bankcard Services of America, Inc.'s Motion for use cashcollateral, in open Court.

About Merchant Bankcard Services of America

Merchants Bankcard Systems of America, Inc., filed a Chapter 11petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 16-13224) on Aug. 18, 2016. Thepetition was signed by Philip Chait, president. The Debtor isrepresented by David B. Madoff, Esq., at Madoff & Khoury LLP. Thecase is assigned to Judge Joan N. Feeney. At the time of filing,the Debtor disclosed $2.58 million in assets and $4.20 million inliabilities.

MERCHANTS BANKCARD: Court Continues Cash Collateral Motion Hearing------------------------------------------------------------------Judge Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Districtof Massachusetts continued the hearing on Merchants BankcardSystems of America, Inc.'s cash collateral motion, and theOpposition of Davos Financial Corp. to the Debtor's use of cash toJan. 31, 2017.

Merchants Bankcard Systems of America, Inc., filed a Chapter 11petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 16-13224) on Aug. 18, 2016. Thepetition was signed by Philip Chait, president. The Debtor isrepresented by David B. Madoff, Esq., at Madoff & Khoury LLP. Thecase is assigned to Judge Joan N. Feeney. At the time of filing,the Debtor disclosed $2.58 million in assets and $4.20 million inliabilities.

METCOM NETWORK: Sale of All Assets to Epsilon for $3.7M Approved----------------------------------------------------------------Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theSouthern District of New York authorized Metcom Network Services,Inc.'s sale of substantially all assets to Epsilon (US), Inc., for$3,730,000.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances,provided, however, that the sale of the NFS Equipment and the NFSCollateral will be free and clear of NFS' liens and claims onlyupon the Purchaser's payment to NFS, and NFS' receipt, of the NFSPayment.

At Closing, the Purchaser will pay $1,085,493 ("NFS Payment") toNFS in full and final satisfaction of NFS' claims against theDebtor. Upon receipt of the NFS Payment: (i) NFS will execute anddeliver to Purchaser and the Debtor a termination of the NFS Lease,and (ii) any lien that NFS has on any property of the Debtor willbe released and expunged. Upon NFS' receipt of the NFS Payment,the NFS Equipment and the NFS Collateral will be transferred toPurchaser free and clear of any and all liens and claims of NFS.

The Purchaser is not a "successor" to the Debtor or its estate byreason of any theory of law or equity, and the Purchaser will notassume, or be deemed to assume, or in any way be responsible forany liability or obligation of the Debtor and/or its estate, otherthan the Assumed Liabilities, with respect to the Acquired Assetsor otherwise, including, but not limited to, under any bulk saleslaw, doctrine or theory of successor liability, or similar theoryor basis of liability.

Pursuant to sections 105(a) and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, andsubject to and conditioned upon the closing of the SaleTransaction, the Debtor's assumption and assignment to thePurchaser, and the Purchaser's assumption on the terms set forth inthe APA, of the Assumed Agreements is approved, and therequirements of section 365(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code withrespect thereto are deemed satisfied. All defaults and all otherobligations or liabilities under any Assumed Agreement occurring,arising, or accruing prior to the date of the assignment ortransfer to the Purchaser will be deemed cured or satisfied uponpayment of the proposed Cure Amount (if any).

Pursuant to sections 105(a) and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, andsubject to and conditioned upon the closing of the SaleTransaction, the Debtor's Rejection of the Rejected Contracts isapproved.

As Epsilon is the Successful Bidder, the administrative claimgranted to Epsilon for the Expense Reimbursement is expunged in itsentirety, and Epsilon will not have any claim against the Debtor orits Bankruptcy Estate for or related to the Expense Reimbursement.

The payment by Epsilon to the Debtor under the APA may be made tothe Debtor's counsel herein, Ackerman Fox, LLP, to be held by saidcounsel in a segregated noninterest bearing escrow account,together with the $131,000 security deposit heretofore remitted byEpsilon under the terms of the APA and the Escrow Agreement, fordisbursement purposes ("Disbursement Account"). The funds in theDisbursement Account will not be distributed by Ackerman Fox to anyperson or entity except to a creditor or claimant holding anallowed claim, or to pay quarterly fees, or as otherwise expresslyordered by the Court.

Notwithstanding anything in the APA or the schedules to the APA tothe contrary, the Cure Amount for the 60 Hudson Lease shall be$2,111,392. The Debtor will pay $167,239 of the Cure Amount andthe Purchaser shall pay $1,944,153 of the Cure Amount. TheDebtor's portion of the Cure Amount includes estimated electricalcharges through Jan. 31, 2017 ("Estimated Electrical Charges"). Tothe extent the Closing Date occurs after Jan. 31, 2017, theEstimated Electrical Charges shall be increased to includeestimated electrical charges through the Closing Date, and theDebtor's portion of the Cure Amount will be increased to includesuch additional Estimated Electrical Charges. No later than Feb.28, 2017, the 60 Hudson Landlord will all provide the Debtor withmeter readings showing the actual electrical charges through theClosing Date. To the extent that the Estimated Electrical Chargesare in excess of actual electrical charges through the ClosingDate, the 60 Hudson Landlord will refund the balance to the Debtorwithin 5 business days after delivery of the meter reading. To theextent that actual electrical charges through the Closing Date arein excess of the Estimated Electrical Charges, the 60 HudsonLandlord will have an administrative claim against the Debtor forthe difference, which will be paid by the Debtor within 5 businessdays after delivery of the meter reading. Within 5 business days ofthe Closing Date, the Purchaser will pay $49,702 to the 60 HudsonLandlord, which amount constitutes property taxes due in Januarycovering periods after Jan. 31, 2017. The releases executed by the60 Hudson Landlord, the Debtor and Epsilon as of the Closing Datewill not release those parties of their obligations.

Notwithstanding the provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 6004 andBankruptcy Rule 6006 or any applicable provisions of the LocalRules, the Order will not be stayed for 14 days after the entryhereof, but will be effective and enforceable immediately uponentry, and the 14-day stay provided in such rules is herebyexpressly waived and will not apply. Any party objecting to theOrder must exercise due diligence in filing an appeal and pursuinga stay within the time prescribed by law and prior to the ClosingDate, or risk its appeal will be foreclosed as moot.

About Metcom Network Services

Metcom Network Services, Inc. is a New York corporation, with itsprincipal place of business at 60 Hudson Street, New York, NY,Suites 1001 and 2303. The Debtor is owned 50% by Mark DuMoulin,Sr. and 50% by Susan BeckerDuMoulin. The Debtor is in the businessof telecommunications, building and local interconnection andengineering support, including the colocation of customerequipment.

The Debtor acts as a primary provider of extremely high capacityfiber optic connections between domestic and international serviceproviders that occupy space throughout the Building located withinthe structure of the Building itself.

Metcom Network Services, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11ofthe Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-11870) on June28,2016. The petition was signed by Mark DuMoulin, Sr., president. The Debtor is represented by Neil H. Ackerman, Esq., at AckermanFox, LLP. At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated itsassets and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

No trustee, examiner, or committee of creditors has been appointedin this case.

Key strengths supporting the corporate family rating upgrade to Ba3include the positive benefits of the relationship with MGM ResortsInternational (rated Ba3 / Stable). The rating upgrade reflects theREIT's high quality assets, a portfolio tenanted through a masterlease by a leading industry operator with a long term track recordand the company's solid leverage and cash flow metrics with Netdebt to EBITDA of 5.8x and fixed charge coverage of 3.3x based uponannualized three month numbers as of September 30, 2016. The ratingupgrade also reflects MGP's improving liquidity profile andwell-laddered debt maturity schedule.

In addition, in August 2016, the company completed its announcedacquisition of the real estate assets associated with the BorgataHotel Casino and Spa in Atlantic City, New Jersey from MGM Resorts.This acquisition increased the annual rent payment due under themaster lease with MGM Resorts by $100 million and helped to furtherdiversify the REIT's portfolio.

Credit challenges include the REIT's high tenant, asset, andgeographic concentrations, and MGM Resorts' effective operationalcontrol of the REIT. The specialized nature of the REIT's uniquegaming assets is also a credit concern.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation that MGPwill maintain its current capital structure and lease terms. Theoutlook also anticipates that MGM Resorts will maintain its currentownership interest in MGP. Any material changes to the master leaseterms -- as they stand -- could erode the rating and outlookcushion.

MGP's ratings and/or ratings outlook could be upgraded as a resultof an upgrade to MGM Resorts' ratings and / or rating outlook, adecrease in the largest tenant concentration to below 50% of theREIT's EBITDA or increased third party ownership of MGP -- beyondthe 50% level -- with commensurate board representation and votingrights.

The ratings could be downgraded as a result of a downgrade to MGMResorts' ratings and / or rating outlook, a decline in portfolioEBITDARM operator coverage to 2.0x or below, Net debt to EBITDA inexcess of 6.0x, fixed charge coverage ratio below 2.5x on aconsistent basis and/or a restructuring of or material change inthe master lease terms.

MGM Growth Properties LLC (NYSE:MGP) is a publicly traded realestate investment trust engaged in the acquisition, ownership andleasing of large-scale destination entertainment and leisureresorts, whose diverse amenities include casino gaming, hotel,convention, dining, entertainment and retail offerings. MGPcurrently owns a portfolio of properties acquired from MGM Resorts,consisting of ten premier destination resorts in Las Vegas andelsewhere across the United States and one dining and entertainmentcomplex which opened in April 2016. As of December 31, 2015, theseproperties collectively comprise 27,233 hotel rooms, approximately2.6 million convention square footage, over 100 retail outlets,over 200 food and beverage outlets and over 20 entertainmentvenues.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global RatingMethodology for REITs and Other Commercial Property Firms publishedin July 2010.

MIAMI NEUROLOGICAL: Wants Approval for Cash Collateral Use----------------------------------------------------------Miami Neurological Institute, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Courtfor the Southern District of Florida for authorization to use thecash collateral of City National Bank of Florida.

The Debtor owes the City National Bank of Florida the total amountof $1,900,000 pursuant to several promissory notes. City NationalBank of Florida has a lien on all of the Debtor's assets ascollateral for the indebtedness.

The Debtor tells the Court that an immediate and critical needexists for the Debtor to be permitted to access cash collateral inorder to continue its operations.

The Debtor's proposed Budget provides for total expenses in theamount of $1,190,384.

The Debtor proposes to grant City National Bank of Florida withongoing contractual payments, and replacement liens in the assetsgenerated by the use of its cash collateral.

Miami Neurological Institute, LLC, based in Aventura, Florida,filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-10703) onJan. 20, 2017. The petition was signed by Juan Ramirez, managingmember. The case is assigned to Judge Laurel M. Isicoff. TheDebtor is represented by Brett A. Elam, Esq., at Farber + Elam,LLC. The Debtor estimated assets at $0 to $50,000 and liabilitiesat $1 million to $10 million at the time of the filing.

MIDWEST ASPHALT: U.S. Trustee Forms Two-Member Committee--------------------------------------------------------Daniel M. McDermott, the U.S. Trustee for Region 12, on Feb. 2,2017, appointed two creditors of Midwest Asphalt Corporation toserve on the official committee of unsecured creditors.

Richard Brown of WD Larson Allstate Peterbilt is designated asacting chairperson of the Committee pending selection by thecommittee members of a permanent chairperson.

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal andaccounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor'sexpense. They may investigate the debtor's business and financialaffairs. Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries tothe general population of creditors they represent.

About Midwest Asphalt Corporation

Midwest Asphalt Corporation, based in Hopkins, Minnesota, filed aChapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 17-40075) on Jan. 12,2017. The petition was signed by Blair Bury, president. TheDebtor is represented by Thomas Flynn, Esq., at Larkin Hoffman. The case is assigned to Judge Katherine A. Constantine. The Debtorestimated assets and debt at $10 million to $50 million at the timeof the filing.

MINDEN AIR: Court Moves Plan Filing Deadline to February 13-----------------------------------------------------------Judge Bruce T. Beesley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Nevada extended the exclusive period during whichMinden Air Corp. may file its plan of reorganization, to andincluding February 13, 2017, and the corresponding exclusive periodfor obtaining confirmation of the plan, to and including April 14,2017.

The Troubled Company Reporter had earlier reported that the Debtorrequested for exclusivity extension since it was still working tostabilize its operations and improve profitability.

About Minden Air Corp.

Minden Air Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of theBankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 16-51033) on August 18,2016. The petition was signed by Leonard K. Parker, president. Thecase is assigned to Judge Bruce T. Beesley. At the time of thefiling, the Debtor disclosed $5.07 million in assets and $883,504in liabilities.

MODULAR SPACE: Plan Outline Lacking in Infos, Gov't Says--------------------------------------------------------Vince Sullivan, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, the U.S. attorneyfor the District of Delaware has filed with the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the District of Delaware an objection to Modular SpaceHoldings Inc.'s disclosure statement, claiming that it does nothave enough information for the U.S. Department of Defense andother creditors to adequately assess the Debtor's Chapter 11 plan.

About Modular Space

Modular Space Corporation (ModSpace), based in Berwyn, Pa. --http://Blog.ModSpace.com/-- is the largest U.S.-owned provider of

Dechert LLP is acting as legal counsel, and Moelis & Company LLC isacting as financial advisor to the ad hoc group of noteholders.

* * *

Modular Space Corporation filed a Prepackaged Plan ofReorganization that will eliminate approximately $400 million ofdebt from the Company's balance sheet, provide $90 million of newequity capital from the bondholders via a rights offering andinclude a new $719 million credit facility to be provided by theexisting asset based lenders (the "Lenders").

General unsecured claims, to the extent not paid earlier by orderof the Court, would either be paid in full in cash or reinstated onthe Effective Date. However, under certain conditions, the Planaffords the noteholders the right to direct the Debtors (subject tocertain consent rights) to pursue an "alternative transaction."

MOLYCORP MINE: Asks Court OK for $40M Minimum Sale of Mine----------------------------------------------------------Jeff Montgomery, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reports thatTrustee Paul E. Harner, Esq., at Ballard Spahr LLC, the Chapter 11trustee for Molycorp Minerals LLC, has asked the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the District of Delaware to authorize the minimum sale of$40 million for the Debtor's California rare earth mine.

The Chapter 11 Trustee, Law360 reports, said that the proposedMarch bidding plan will be led by a $40 million "stalking horse"offer.

About Molycorp Inc. and Molycorp Minerals

Molycorp Inc. -- http://www.molycorp.com/-- is a global rare earths and rare metals producer. Molycorp owns several prominentare earth processing facilities around the world. It has aworkforce of 2,530 employees at locations on three continents. Molycorp's Mountain Pass Rare Earth Facility in San BernadinoCounty, California, is home to one of the world's largest andrichest deposits of rare earths.

Molycorp has corporate offices in the United States, Canada andChina. CEO Geoffrey R. Bedford, and other senior managementmembers are located in Molycorp's corporate offices in Toronto,Canada. Other senior management members are located at its U.S.corporate headquarters in Greenwood Village, Colorado.

Molycorp and its North American subsidiaries, together withcertain of its non-operating subsidiaries outside of North America, filed Chapter 11 voluntary petitions in Delaware (Bankr.D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-11357) on June 25, 2015, after reachingagreement with a group of lenders on a financial restructuring. The Chapter 11 cases of Molycorp and 20 affiliated debts arepending before Judge Christopher S. Sontchi.

The agreement provides for a financial restructuring of theCompany's $1.7 billion in debt and provides up to $225 million ingross proceeds in new financing to support operations while theCompany completes negotiations with creditors.

The Company's operations outside of North America, with theexception of non-operating companies in Luxembourg and Barbados,are excluded from the filings. Molycorp Rare Metals (Oklahoma),LLC, with operations in Quapaw, Oklahoma, also is excluded fromthe filings as it is not 100% owned by the Company.

On July 8, 2015, the U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case ofMolycorp Inc. appointed eight creditors of the company to serve onthe official committee of unsecured creditors. The CreditorsCommittee tapped Ashby & Geddes, P.A. and Paul Hastings LLP asattorneys. On Nov. 9, the U.S. Trustee disbanded the committeefollowing the resignation of committee members Wilmington SavingsFund Society FSB, MP Environmental Services Inc., ComputershareTrust Company of Canada, Veolia Water North America OperatingServices LLC, Delaware Trust Company, Wazee Street CapitalManagement, Plymouth Lane Partners (Master) LP, and UnitedSteelworkers.

* * *

Molycorp, Inc.'s Fourth Joint Amended Plan of Reorganization hasbeen confirmed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District ofDelaware. The Plan contemplates two possible outcomes: (1) thesale of substantially all of the Debtors' assets if certainconditions set forth in the Plan are satisfied and (2) (a) the saleof the assets associated with the Debtors' Mountain Pass miningfacility in San Bernardino County, California; and (b) thestand-alone reorganization around the Debtors' other three businessunits.

Judge Christopher Sontchi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Delaware on April 8, 2016, issued a findings of fact,conclusions of law, and order confirming the Fourth Amended JointPlan of Reorganization of Molycorp, Inc., and its debtoraffiliates.

On May 2, 2016, the Court entered an order in the MolycorpMinerals Debtors' cases approving the appointment of Paul E. Harner as chapter 11 trustee for Molycorp Mineral Debtors' bankruptcy estates.

On Aug. 31, 2016, Molycorp reported that its confirmed FourthJoint Amended Plan became effective as of that date. Molycorpemerged from Chapter 11 protection as a newly reorganizedbusiness, now known as Neo Performance Materials.

MOLYCORP MINERALS: Rare Earth Buying Mountain Pass Mine for $40M----------------------------------------------------------------Paul E. Harner, Trustee for Molycorp Minerals, LLC and affiliates,asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware toauthorize the bidding procedures in connection with the sale ofMinerals Debtors' Mountain Pass Mine to Rare Earth Global Partnersfor $40,000,000, in cash, plus any amounts required to cure allcosts and expenses associated with the assumption by the Purchaserof the assigned contracts, plus any transfer taxes arising from orin connection with the sale, subject to overbid.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Feb. 27, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.(ET). Objection deadline is Feb. 17, 2017 at 4:00 p.m. (ET). TheSale Hearing is set for March 30, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

The principal assets of the Minerals Debtors are surface rights andcertain mineral rights to a rare earth minerals mine and a rareearth extraction facility located in San Bernardino County,California ("Mountain Pass Mine"). The Mountain Pass Mine wasdevoted to extracting rare earth minerals and producing rare earthconcentrates, rare earth oxides and SorbX and PhosFIX, a line ofproprietary rare earth-based water treatment products. Theproducts generated by the Minerals Debtors were used in oilrefinery catalyst, automotive, water purification and hybrid andelectric vehicle applications. During these chapter 11 cases, theMountain Pass Mine was transitioned into a state of care andmaintenance pursuant to a limited operations plan required by theMinerals Debtors and 15 of their affiliates ("Plan Debtors")'spostpetition financing facility. Current operations are limited tothe occasional sale of surplus assets or inventory processed priorto placing the mine in "cold-idle" status.

The Mountain Pass Mine was previously marketed for sale over aperiod of several months by the Plan Debtors and their investmentbanker, Miller Buckfire & Co., LLC, however, the Plan Debtors wereunable to identify a potential buyer on terms acceptable to thePlan Debtors’ and the Minerals Debtors' senior secured lender andpostpetition lender, OCM MLYCo CTB Ltd. ("Oaktree") or an ad hocgroup of certain holders of 10% senior notes secured bysubstantially all of the assets of the Minerals Debtors ("10%Notes").

The Trustee was appointed in these cases and charged with oneprimary task: to actively pursue a turn-key sale of the MountainPass Mine in order to maximize the value of the Minerals Debtors'estates for the benefit of the creditors. The sale proposed is theculmination of a comprehensive sales and marketing processesoverseen by the Trustee, and upon its approval by the Court, willmark the accomplishment of the difficult task and move the Trusteecloser toward his ultimate goal of confirming a liquidating plan inthese cases.

Relevant dates and proposed deadlines in connection with theBidding Procedures and Sale are:

c. March 3, 2017: Proposed deadline for filing andservice of the Assumption and Assignment Notice;

d. March 3, 2017: Date of publication of the notice ofAuction;

e. March 13, 2017: Deadline for filing objections to theassumption and assignment of executory contracts and unexpiredleases and proposed cure amounts, except as to adequate assuranceof future performance;

f. March 17, 2017: Qualified Bids due with good faithDeposit, proof of financial ability to pay and mark-up of thePurchase Agreement;

g. March 22, 2017: Auction to take place at thePhiladelphia offices of Ballard Spahr LLP;

The Trustee's sale process is being managed by Batuta CapitalAdvisors, LLC. Batuta's strategy was to conduct a focusedmarketing effort to identify parties best suited to serve as astalking horse bidder in connection with a project of this type. To date, Batuta has received indications of interest from fourpotential stalking horse purchasers.

It is through their efforts that Batuta has identified the StalkingHorse Bidder, as a potential purchaser. Following initialnegotiations, the Minerals Debtors and the Stalking Horse Bidderhave executed a Term Sheet for the Sale of the Purchased Assets("Term Sheet"). The Term Sheet contemplates the negotiation andexecution of a definitive

Asset Purchase Agreement and its filing with the Court on Feb. 24,2017. In accordance with the Term Sheet, the Stalking Horse Bidderseeks to acquire the assets it deems critical to operating theMountain Pass Mine including but not limited to (i) certainequipment located at the Mountain Pass Mine belonging to Oaktreeand leased to the Minerals Debtors ("Oaktree Equipment"); and (ii)the minerals rights relating to the Mountain Pass Mine that weregranted to Shared Natural Resources, LLC, a joint venture ofOaktree and the holders of the 10% Notes pursuant to the Plan andConfirmation Order.

The material terms of the Agreement are:

a. Purchaser: Rare Earth Global Partners ("Stalking HorseBidder")

b. Sellers: Minerals Debtors

c. Purchased Assets: Mountain Pass Mine

d. Purchase Price: $40,000,000, in cash, plus any amountsrequired to cure all costs and expenses associated with theassumption by the Purchaser of the Assigned Contracts, plus anytransfer taxes arising from or in connection with the ProposedTransaction.

e. Deposit: 5% of the Purchase Price, which will bepayable upon execution of the Purchase Agreement and will beapplied toward the Purchase Price at closing.

f. Liens and Encumbrances: All Purchased Assets will betransferred to the Purchaser free and clear of all claims, liens,encumbrances, interests and other restrictions of any kind ornature whatsoever.

g. "As Is, Where Is" Transaction: The Sale will be on an"as is, where is" basis and without representations or warrantiesof any kind, nature or description by the Trustee or the Sellerswhether written or verbal, whether express, implied or by operationof law.

h. Employees: The Purchaser will offer employment,effective upon the closing, to all current employees primarilyengaged in the Sellers' business at the Mountain Pass Mine. Suchoffers of employment will be on substantially similar terms andwith substantially similar compensation and benefits as those towhich such employees were entitled from Sellers as of immediatelyprior to the closing.

i. Closing Conditions: Usual and customary closingconditions for transactions of this size and type, including butnot limited to: (i) an agreement in principal regarding the OaktreeEquipment; and (ii) license, lease, sale or other transfer of themineral rights.

j. Termination; Break-Up Fee: 4.5% of the Purchase Price

k. Expenses: Each party will be responsible for its ownout-of-pocket costs incurred in respect of the Sale, including allfees and disbursements of legal, accounting, investment banking andother advisors and any brokers' or finders' fees.

l. Closing: The date on which the transactionscontemplated by the Purchase Agreement close, which will be nolater than fourteen days following the entry of a sale orderentered by the Bankruptcy Court.

A copy of the Agreement and Bidding Procedures attached to theMotion is available for free at:

The Trustee asks approval of these Bidding Procedures which follow,in relevant part, the bidding procedures proposed by the PlanDebtors and approved by the Court in connection with the Plan:

a. Bid Deadline: March 17, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

b. Deposit: 5% of the proposed purchase price

c. Auction: If more than one Qualified Bid is received bythe Bid Deadline, the Trustee will conduct the Auction. TheAuction will take place at 10:00 a.m. (ET) on March 22, 2017, atthe offices of Ballard Spahr LLP, 1735 Market Street, 48th Floor,Philadelphia, Penssylvania, or such other time as the Trustee maynotify all Qualified Bidders. The Stalking Horse Bidder will be aQualified Bidder and the Purchase Agreement will be a QualifiedBid.

d. Minimum Overbid: $250,000

e. "As Is, Where Is": The Sale will be on an "as is,where is" basis and without representations or warranties of anykind, nature or description by the Trustee, the Minerals Debtors,their agents or the bankruptcy estates.

The Trustee believes that the Bidding Procedures are appropriatelytailored to ensure that the bidding process is fair and reasonableand will yield the maximum value for the Minerals Debtors' estatesand creditors. Accordingly, the Trustee asks the Court toauthorize the Bidding Procedures.

The Trustee also asks the Court that he'd be authorized to offerthe Stalking Horse Bidder a Breakup Fee of up to 4.5% of the cashconsideration offered by the Stalking Horse Purchaser. The BreakupFee is designed to incentivize the Stalking Horse Bidder to makethe initial binding bid for the Purchased Assets and establish afloor price for the Auction. Approval of breakup fees and otherforms of bid protections in connection with the sale of significantassets is an established practice in chapter 11 cases.

Central to the Trustee's proposed sale of Purchased Assets of theMinerals Debtors is the ability to operate the Mountain Pass Mineand the assumption and assignment of executory contracts andunexpired leases is a critical component of the Sale. It is thusan appropriate exercise of business judgment for the Trustee topropose that purchasers may direct the Minerals Debtors to assumeand assign to them the contracts and leases that will be requiredin connection with the Sale. The Trustee submits that theAssumption and Assignment Notice provides adequate notice of theproposed assumption and assignment of counterparties' contractsand/or leases and should be approved.

The Trustee was appointed for the primary purpose of selling theMountain Pass Mine for the benefit of the creditors of the MineralsDebtors. Not only is the proposed Sale the best method ofmaximizing the recovery for the creditors, it may be the only meansfor those creditors to obtain a cash distribution in these cases.Accordingly, the Trustee asks the Court to approve the proposedsale free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, and otherinterests.

About Molycorp Inc. and Molycorp Minerals

Molycorp Inc. -- http://www.molycorp.com/-- is a global rare earths and rare metals producer. Molycorp owns several prominentare earth processing facilities around the world. It has aworkforce of 2,530 employees at locations on three continents. Molycorp's Mountain Pass Rare Earth Facility in San BernadinoCounty, California, is home to one of the world's largest andrichest deposits of rare earths.

Molycorp has corporate offices in the United States, Canada andChina. CEO Geoffrey R. Bedford, and other senior managementmembers are located in Molycorp's corporate offices in Toronto,Canada. Other senior management members are located at its U.S.corporate headquarters in Greenwood Village, Colorado.

Molycorp and its North American subsidiaries, together withcertain of its non-operating subsidiaries outside of North America, filedChapter 11 voluntary petitions in Delaware (Bankr. D. Del. LeadCase No. 15-11357) on June 25, 2015, after reaching agreement witha group of lenders on a financial restructuring. The Chapter 11 cases of Molycorp and 20 affiliated debts arepending before Judge Christopher S. Sontchi.

The agreement provides for a financial restructuring of theCompany's $1.7 billion in debt and provides up to $225 million ingross proceeds in new financing to support operations while theCompany completes negotiations with creditors.

The Company's operations outside of North America, with theexception of non-operating companies in Luxembourg and Barbados,are excluded from the filings. Molycorp Rare Metals (Oklahoma),LLC, with operations in Quapaw, Oklahoma, also is excluded fromthe filings as it is not 100% owned by the Company.

On July 8, 2015, the U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 caseofMolycorp Inc. appointed eight creditors of the company to serve onthe official committee of unsecured creditors. The CreditorsCommittee tapped Ashby & Geddes, P.A. and Paul Hastings LLP asattorneys. On Nov. 9, the U.S. Trustee disbanded the committeefollowing the resignation of committee members Wilmington SavingsFund Society FSB, MP Environmental Services Inc., ComputershareTrust Company of Canada, Veolia Water North America OperatingServices LLC, Delaware Trust Company, Wazee Street CapitalManagement, Plymouth Lane Partners (Master) LP, and UnitedSteelworkers.

* * *

Molycorp, Inc.'s Fourth Joint Amended Plan of Reorganization hasbeen confirmed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District ofDelaware. The Plan contemplates two possible outcomes: (1) thesale of substantially all of the Debtors' assets if certainconditions set forth in the Plan are satisfied and (2) (a) thesale of the assets associated with the Debtors' Mountain Pass miningfacility in San Bernardino County, California; and (b) thestand-alone reorganization around the Debtors' other threebusiness units.

Judge Christopher Sontchi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Delaware on April 8, 2016, issued a findings of fact,conclusions of law, and order confirming the Fourth Amended JointPlan of Reorganization of Molycorp, Inc., and its debtoraffiliates.

On May 2, 2016, the Court entered an order in the MolycorpMinerals Debtors' cases approving the appointment of Paul E. Harner as chapter 11 trustee for Molycorp Mineral Debtors' bankruptcy estates.

On Aug. 31, 2016, Molycorp reported that its confirmed FourthJoint Amended Plan became effective as of that date. Molycorpemerged from Chapter 11 protection as a newly reorganizedbusiness, now known as Neo Performance Materials.

NAUTILUS FUNDING: Can Use Dime Bank Cash Until Feb. 28------------------------------------------------------Judge James J. Tancredi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Connecticut authorized Nautilus Funding, Inc., to useDime Bank's cash collateral on an interim basis, from Feb. 1, 2017to Feb. 28, 2017.

The Debtor stated that it is essential to the Debtor's business andoperations to use cash generated from its rental payments from itsproperties so as to continue to pay ordinary course businessexpenses. Without court authority to use the cash collateral, theDebtor said it will suffer harm and be forced to terminateoperations and abort any chance for successful reorganization.

Secured creditor Dime Bank claimed a duly perfected, non-avoidablesecurity interest in the Debtor's properties in Groton,Connecticut, including cash collateral associated with the realproperties.

The Debtor is authorized to use cash collateral to meet all itsnecessary business expenses incurred in the ordinary course of itsbusiness and the U.S. Trustee's statutory fees, in an amount not toexceed $2,395.

The approved Budget for February 2017 provided for total expensesin the amount of $2,386.41.

Dime Bank is granted replacement lines in all after-acquiredproperty of the Debtor, of the same extent and priority in whichDime Bank enjoyed as of the Petition Date.

The Debtor is directed to make monthly adequate protection paymentsto Dime Bank in the amount of $250. The Debtor is further directedto provide Dime Bank with a monthly register report from all DIPaccounts showing all disbursements made for the prior 30 days, onthe 15th of each month beginning Sept. 15, 2016.

A hearing on the continued use of cash collateral is scheduled onFeb. 16, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.

Nautilus Funding, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.Conn. Case No. 16-21285) on Aug. 7, 2016. The petition was signedby its John G. Syragakis, principal. Judge James J. Tancredipresides over the case. The Debtor is represented by Joseph J.D'Agostino, Esq. at Joseph J. D'Agostino, Jr., LLC. At the time offiling, the Debtor estimated both assets and liabilities at$100,001 to $500,000. No trustee or examiner has been appointed inthe proceedings.

NEPHROGENEX INC: Files Report on De Minimis Assets Sold-------------------------------------------------------NephroGenex, Inc., filed a notice with the U.S. Bankruptcy Courtfor the District of Delaware that it is submitting its reportlisting all assets sold pursuant to the Order Pursuant to Sections105(a), 363 and 554(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule2002 Authorizing and Approving Procedures for the Sale orAbandonment of De Minimis Assets Free and Clear of Liens, Claims,Interests and Encumbrances in January of 2017.

Raleigh, N.C.-based NephroGenex, Inc., is a drug developmentcompany that focuses on developing novel therapies for kidneydisease. It develops Pyridorin (pyridoxamine dihydrochoride), atherapeutic agent, which is in Phase III clinical study for thetreatment of diabetic nephropathy.

NephroGenex filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.Del. Case No. 16-11074) on April 30, 2016, disclosing $4.9 millionin total assets and $6.2 million in total debt as of April 30,2016. The petition was signed by John P. Hamill, chiefexecutive officer and chief financial officer.

NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA YMCA: Can Use Cash Collateral Until April 14------------------------------------------------------------------Judge Karen K. Specie of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the NorthernDistrict of Florida authorized The North Central Florida YMCA,Inc., to use Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s cash collateral on an interimbasis until April 4, 2017.

The approved Budget provided for total expenses in the amount of$76,950 for February and $76,850 for March.

The Debtor is directed to make monthly adequate protection paymentsto Wells Fargo in an amount equal to the greater of $1,000 permonth, or the total amount by which the Debtor's budgeted incomeexceeds its budgeted expenses for the preceding month, beginning onFeb. 2, 2017.

Wells Fargo was granted a perfected post-petition lien against allcash collateral to the same extent and with the same validity andpriority as its prepetition liens. Wells Fargo was further grantedpriority in payment, in the event the adequate protection is foundto be insufficient.

Judge Specie ordered the Debtor to furnish Wells Fargo withbi-weekly accountings of all cash receipts and disbursements, withall disbursements categorized and sorted by budget line item. Shealso orderd the Debtor to maintain insurance coverage for itsproperty in accordance with the obligations under the loan andsecurity documents with Wells Fargo.

The North Central Florida YMCA, Inc., based in Gainesville,Florida, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No.16-10293) on Dec. 14, 2016. The petition was signed by Michele F.Martin, vice-chair. The Debtor is represented by Michele Martin,Esq., at Pastore & Dailey, LLC. The case is assigned to JudgeKaren K. Specie. The Debtor disclosed $3.49 million in assets and$4.30 million in liabilities.

NORTHPORT BAY: Court Prohibits Cash Collateral Use--------------------------------------------------Louis A. Scarcella of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the EasternDistrict of New York prohibited Northport Bay Inc. a/k/a 45 BayviewHoldings from using cash collateral.

Secured creditor National Loan Investors, L.P., objected to theDebtor's use of cash collateral.

Judge Scarcella held that the Debtor will have no authority to useany of the rents pending further Order of the Court.

The Debtor is directed to turn over to counsel for National LoanInvestors, all rents collected by the Debtor, its principal, or anythird party arising from the rental/lease of any portion of theDebtor's real property located at 45 Bayview Avenue, Inwood, NewYork in the Debtor's possession, including all monies currently ondeposit in the Debtor's debtor-in-possession bank account, togetherwith a detailed accounting of all rents collected since the filingof the Chapter 11 case, by no later than February 3, 2017.

The Debtor is further directed to provide National Loan Investor'scounsel with contact information for each tenant currently residingat the Premises and the agreed amount of monthly rent to be paidtherefor and any other relevant lease terms.

The Debtor is ordered to continue collecting rents from all tenantsat the Property, diligently and in good faith. The rents will bedeposited directly into the Debtor's DIP Account, and within twobusiness days of clearance, will be turned over to National LoanInvestor counsel with a detailed accounting of the funds beingturned over.

National Loan Investor is directed to:

(1) pay, from the funds turned over from the Debtor, only tothe extent that sufficient funds are turned over, all insurance andutility costs associated with the Property, within 10 business daysof presentment of supporting documentation including but notlimited to billing statements in their original form;

(2) pay, from the funds turned over from the Debtor and to theextent that there are sufficient funds turned over, all quarterlyfees due to the United States Trustee;

(3) pay to the utility providers for the Property, from thefunds turned over from the Debtor and only to the extent thatsufficient funds are turned over, such amounts as may be directedby an Order of the Court granting the Debtor’s motion to approveadequate assurance for utility providers.

Northport Bay, Inc., aka 45 Bay Holdings filed a Chapter 11bankruptcy petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-75598) on December2, 2016. The Petition was signed by Sandra Nicholas, VicePresident. Initially, Jeff P. Prostok, Esq., at Forshey & Prostok,LLP serves as bankruptcy counsel. At the time of filing, theDebtor's assets and liabilities were estimated to be between $1million to $10 million each.

Currently, the Debtor is represented by Andrew Thaler, Esq. atThaler Law Firm PLLC.

OAKS OF PRAIRIE: Can Use Illinois State Bank Cash Until Feb. 28---------------------------------------------------------------Judge Thomas M. Lynch of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the NorthernDistrict of Illinois authorized The Oaks of Prairie PointCondominium Association to use Illinois State Bank's cashcollateral on an interim basis, from Feb. 1, 2017 through Feb. 28,2017.

The Debtor is directed to pay Illinois State Bank $10,728.81 on orbefore February 15, 2017.

Judge Lynch held that the Debtor cannot make any disbursements fromor deposits to the Debtor-in-Possession account currently locatedat Rockford Bank and Trust, without the consent of Illinois StateBank or further order of the Court.

The approved Budget for the month of February, provided for totalexpenses in the amount of $32,229.

Illinois State Bank is granted a valid, perfected and enforceablesecurity interest in and to the Debtor's postpetition accounts,assessments and other receivables which are currently or may laterbecome, property of the estate, to the extent and priority of itsalleged prepetition liens.

The Debtor was directed to execute any documents that may bereasonably required by Illinois State Bank to evidence thepostpetition interests granted.

The Debtor is further directed to permit the Bank to:

(a) inspect the Debtor's books and records;

(b) maintain and pay premiums for insurance to cover all ofits assets from fire, theft and water damage;

(c) make available to Illinois State Bank evidence of thatwhich constitutes its collateral or proceeds; and

(d) properly maintain its property in good repair and properlymanage such property.

A status hearing on the Debtor's Motion is scheduled on Feb. 22,2017 at 10:30 a.m.

The Oaks of Prairie Point Condominium Association is an Illinoiscorporation that owns and operates condominium buildings located inLake in the Hills, Illinois, known as "The Oaks of Prairie PointCondominium".

The Oaks of Prairie Point Condominium sought protection underChapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.16-80238) on Feb. 3, 2016. The petition was signed by Donna Smith,property manager. The case is assigned to Judge Thomas M. Lynch.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10million at the time of the filing.

OPTIMA SPECIALTY: Executives Get $1.1MM, Workers Can Have $4.6MM----------------------------------------------------------------Cara Mannion, writing for Bankruptcy Law360, reports that the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware has ruled that OptimaSpecialty Steel, Inc.'s top executives be paid $1.1 million. Law360 relates that the amount will be split among 11 of theDebtor's top executives, including the general counsel. The Courtalso approved a $4.6 million payment for lower- to mid-levelemployees. According to the report, the committee of unsecuredcreditors initially argued against the payments on Jan. 23, 2017.

Optima Specialty Steel and its affiliates are independentmanufacturers of specialty steel products. Their manufacturingfacilities are located in the United States, and each of thecompanies' operating units have operated in the steel industry formore than 50 years. At the time of the bankruptcy filing, theDebtors collectively employ more than 900 people.

PAYLESS INC: Moody's Lowers Corporate Family Rating to Caa2-----------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service downgraded Payless Inc.'s CorporateFamily Rating ("CFR") to Caa2 from B3 and Probability of Default toCaa2-PD from B3-PD. The company's $520 million 1st lien term loandue 2021 and $145 million 2nd lien term loan due 2022 were alsodowngraded to Caa1 and Caa3, respectively. The rating outlook isnegative.

"The downgrade reflects weaker than anticipated operatingperformance resulting in deteriorating credit metrics, as well asheightened risk of a distressed exchange and a weak liquidityprofile highlighted by limited availability under the company's ABLfacility and the potential for negative free cash flow," saysMoody's Analyst Dan Altieri.

Operating results over the last twelve months ended October 29,2016 have resulted in revenue declines with modestly lower EBITDAmargins, as well as comparable store sales declines for the YTDperiod. As a result, Moody's lease adjusted leverage (Debt/EBITDA)for the LTM period has risen to over 6 times, with interestcoverage (EBIT-to-interest) below 1 time. Moody's notes thatunadjusted leverage for funded debt is in excess of 10 times.

The negative outlook reflects Moody's expectation that given thecompany's meaningful debt burden and a difficult retailenvironment, the company will be challenged to improve operatingperformance sufficient to meaningfully improve credit metrics andgenerate free cash flow.

Payless' Caa2 CFR reflects the company's high leverage, poorinterest coverage and weak liquidity profile resulting from worsethan anticipated operating performance combined with sustainedelevated borrowings on the company's ABL facility. Alsoconstraining the rating is the company's history ofhighly-aggressive financial policies that includes nearly $350million of debt-funded dividends since the company's 2012 leveragedbuy-out. Factors supporting the rating include the company'smeaningful international presence and value-orientated brand(under-$30 price point) which Moody's believes helped minimize someof the impact from the most recent downturn. However, operationswill continue to be impacted by a challenging retail environmentthat includes declining mall traffic trends and a highlypromotional environment.

Payless' liquidity is weak, driven by limited availability on thecompany's $300 million ABL revolving credit facility expiring in2019 and the potential for negative free cash flow (CFO - Capex)over the next 12-18 months. While Moody's anticipates some seasonalrepayments and borrowings on the revolver to support workingcapital needs, the company will be challenged to meaningfullyreduce outstanding borrowings from current levels without reducingits growth capex spending. Further constraining availability willbe the springing Fixed Charge Coverage test, which is triggeredwhen availability is less than the greater of $20 million or 10% ofthe borrowing base. Moody's does not expect the company wouldcomply with the covenant if it were tested.

The $520 million first lien term loan due 2021 and $145 millionsecond lien term loan due 2022 do not contain any financialmaintenance covenants. Supporting liquidity is the company'sbalance sheet cash and Moody's estimate of approximately $50million of availability on the revolver (before accounting for thespringing covenant).

The liquidity analysis is based on Moody's assumptions andestimates. However, there is some uncertainty about the company'sliquidity given the absence of information available to Moody'ssuch as the ABL borrowing base, availability, and the current fixedcharge coverage calculation. In addition, working capitalfluctuations could meaningfully impact free cash flow and the levelof revolver borrowings.

The Caa1 rating on Payless' $520 million 1st lien term loan is onenotch higher than the company's Caa2 CFR and reflects its seniorposition in the capital structure relative to the $145 million 2ndlien term loan (rated Caa3) and other junior claims including tradepayables, leases and pension liabilities. The 1st lien term loan issecured by a first priority lien on substantially all assets of theborrower, with a second lien on the ABL priority collateral (cash,inventory, accounts receivable, and property). The 2nd lien termloan is secured by a second priority lien on all assets of theborrower, except the ABL priority collateral on which it has athird lien.

Ratings could be upgraded if the company is able to stabilizeoperating trends resulting in improved gross and EBITDA marginscombined with consistent same store sales growth. An improvedliquidity profile with meaningful repayments on the revolvingcredit facility could also lead to an upgrade.

The ratings could be downgraded if operating performance and/orliquidity fails to improve and/or if the company breaches anycovenants. Ratings could be downgraded if the company is unable torestore sustained positive free cash flow, or if there is increasedpotential for a distressed exchange.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industrypublished in October 2015.

Payless Inc. operates approximately 4,400 family footwear stores(including joint-ventures and franchisees) in approximately 30countries with LTM revenues of over $2.3 billion. The company iscontrolled by funds affiliated with Golden Gate Capital and BlumCapital

PEABODY ENERGY: Moody's Assigns (P)B1 Corporate Family Rating-------------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service assigned provisional new ratings toPeabody Energy Corporation, including a provisional corporatefamily rating (CFR) of (P)B1, a (P)Ba3 provisional rating on $500million first lien secured term loan, and a (P)Ba3 provisionalrating on $1 billion first lien secured notes to be issued by thePeabody Securities Finance Corporation. The outlook is stable.

The proposed debt offering will be used to repay existing firstlien debt as part of the exit financing and pay related fees andexpenses. The provisional ratings are assigned pending theemergence from bankruptcy and the closing of the proposed exitfinancing. The company is expected to emerge from bankruptcy in thenext few months.

Upon emergence, Peabody Securities Finance Corporation will bemerged into Peabody Energy Corporation which will assume theobligations under the notes. To the extent that the proposedtransaction does not close, the notes will be repaid from theescrow account.

On January 26, 2017 the company announced that the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the Eastern District of Missouri has approved thecompany's disclosure statement, enabling the company to solicit itscreditors to vote on the proposed plan of reorganization.

Issuer: Peabody Energy Corporation

Assignments:

-- Corporate Family Rating, Assigned to (P)B1

-- Senior Secured Term Loan, Assigned (P)Ba3 (LGD2)

Outlook Actions:

-- Outlook is Stable

Peabody Securities Finance Corporation

-- Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned (P)Ba3 (LGD2)

-- Outlook, Assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The ratings reflect the company's diverse platform ofcost-competitive assets, including seven mining complexes in theWestern United States, nine in Midwestern United States, and ninein Australia. While the company's US operations producecost-competitive thermal coal sold predominantly to domesticutilities, the company's mines in Australia produce thermal andmetallurgical coal predominantly sold into the seaborne market.

The company's largest contributors to EBITDA are its Powder RiverBasin and Australian assets, and the assigned ratings reflect highpotential volatility in the company's margins depending on naturalgas prices (which PRB coal is particularly sensitive to) and/ormetallurgical coal prices, which have been highly volatile andunpredictable in recent years. The ratings reflect the company'ssolid contracted position, along with Moody's expectations ofcontracting earnings over the next few years as high-priced legacycontracts roll off and Australian production volumes decline.

The ratings further reflect the company's modest expected leveragepost-emergence of roughly 2x, assuming average metallurgical coalbenchmark settlements of $175 per tonne. The ratings furtherreflect, however, potential volatility in margin and increase inleverage should coal prices retreat to the low levels observed in2015 and 2016.

The (P) Ba3 rating on the first lien debt reflects its priorityposition with respect to claim on collateral, relative to thesecond lien debt. The company's proposed capital structure consistsof $500 million in first lien term loan, $1 billion of first liensecured notes and $450 million in second lien debt.

The ratings reflect Moody's expectations of good liquiditypost-emergence, including ample cash balance of roughly $1 billionby the end of 2017 and the absence of financial covenants on theterm loan, coupled with the absence of a revolving credit facility.Moody's expects positive free cash flows over the next twelvemonths at current prices. Moody's note, however, that free cashflows could turn negative at some of the pricing levels observedover the past two years while the industry was in distress.

The ratings could be upgraded if the rate of secular decline in theUS thermal coal industry were to slow or reverse, and ifmetallurgical coal markets were to show more stability andpredictability. The ratings could also be upgraded in the event ofmaterial growth in scale and diversity.

The ratings could be downgraded if Debt/EBITDA, as adjusted, wereto increase above 5x, if free cash flows were to turn negative, orif liquidity were to deteriorate.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global MiningIndustry published in August 2014.

Peabody Energy Corporation is the world's largest private sectorcoal company with coal mining operations in the US and Australiaand close to 6 billion tons of proven and probable reserves. As ofSeptember 30, 2016, the company owned interests in 26 active coalmining operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 thecompany generated $3.3 billion in revenues.

PEABODY ENERGY: Seeks May 1 Extension of Plan Filing Deadline-------------------------------------------------------------Peabody Energy Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries requestthe U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri toextend their exclusive periods to (a) file a plan ofreorganization, through and including May 1, 2017, and (b) solicitacceptances of its plan, through and including June 30, 2017.

Pursuant to a Bridge Order, the Exclusive Filing Period has beenextended through and including February 15, 2017.

The Debtors relate that since the commencement of their Chapter 11cases, they have focused on stabilizing their operations, complyingwith the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and the Federal Rulesof Bankruptcy Procedure, developing a restructuring plan thatmaximizes value for stakeholders and ensures a viable companypost-emergence and negotiating such a plan, along with importantrelated agreements that will result in a $1.5 billion new moneyinvestment in the reorganized Debtors, with their major creditorconstituencies.

On January 27, 2017, the Court approved the Debtors' Second AmendedDisclosure Statement with respect to their Second Amended JointPlan of Reorganization. As such, the Debtors request for furtherextension of the Exclusive Periods out of an abundance of cautionand prudence since the Exclusive Filing Period will expire beforethe scheduled confirmation hearing on the Solicitation Plan.

About Peabody Energy Corporation

Headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, Peabody Energy Corporationclaims to be the world's largest private-sector coal company. Asof Dec. 31, 2014, the Company owned interests in 26 active coalmining operations located in the United States (U.S.) andAustralia. The Company has a majority interest in 25 of thosemining operations and a 50% equity interest in the Middlemount Minein Australia. In addition to its mining operations, the Companymarkets and brokers coal from other coal producers, both asprincipal and agent, and trade coal and freight-related contractsthrough trading and business offices in Australia, China, Germany,India, Indonesia, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the U.S.

Peabody posted a net loss of $1.988 billion for 2015, wider fromthe net loss of $777 million in 2014 and the $513 million net lossin 2013.

At Dec. 31, 2015, the Company had total assets of $11.02 billionagainst $10.1 billion in total liabilities, and stockholders'equity of $919 million.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 29, 2016, appointed sevencreditors of Peabody Energy Corp. to serve on the officialcommittee of unsecured creditors. The Committee retained Morrison& Foerster LLP as counsel, Spencer Fane LLP as local counsel,Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as conflicts counsel,Blackacre LLC as its independent expert, and Berkeley ResearchGroup, LLC, as financial advisor.

PEABODY ENERGY: Special Purpose Unit to Offer $1-Bil. in Notes--------------------------------------------------------------Peabody Energy Corporation on Feb. 1, 2017, said a special purposewholly owned subsidiary of the company intends to offer up to $1.0billion aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due2022, subject to market conditions. The offering will be exemptfrom the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933.

The notes are being offered in connection with the restructuring ofPeabody as part of the Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganizationfiled with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District ofMissouri on Jan. 27, 2017.

If Peabody's plan of reorganization is confirmed and certain otherconditions are satisfied on or before Aug. 1, 2017, the netproceeds from the offering will be released from escrow to fund aportion of the distributions to creditors provided for under theplan of reorganization, and Peabody will become the obligor underthe notes.

Following Peabody's emergence from bankruptcy, the notes will bejointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on asenior secured basis by substantially all of Peabody's current andfuture direct or indirect U.S. subsidiaries (subject to certainexceptions) and will be secured by a first priority lien onsubstantially all of Peabody's tangible and intangible assets(subject to certain exceptions).

The notes and related guarantees will be offered only to qualifiedinstitutional buyers under Rule 144A of the Securities Act, and tonon-U.S. persons in transactions outside the United States underRegulation S of the Securities Act. The notes have not been, andwill not be, registered under the Securities Act and may not beoffered or sold in the United States absent registration or anapplicable exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, theregistration requirements of the Securities Act and otherapplicable securities laws.

Peabody also said on Wednesday that it expects to disclose certainsupplemental information concerning the Company in a preliminaryoffering circular that is being disseminated in connection with theproposed senior secured notes offering. The supplementalinformation included in the preliminary offering circular, certainof which has been previously reported, is available athttps://is.gd/JoSC0H

About Peabody Energy Corporation

Headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, Peabody Energy Corporationclaims to be the world's largest private-sector coal company. Asof Dec. 31, 2014, the Company owned interests in 26 active coalmining operations located in the United States (U.S.) andAustralia. The Company has a majority interest in 25 of thosemining operations and a 50% equity interest in the MiddlemountMine in Australia. In addition to its mining operations, the Company markets and brokers coal from other coal producers, both as principal and agent, and trade coal and freight-related contracts through trading and business offices in Australia, China, Germany, India, Indonesia, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the U.S.

Peabody posted a net loss of $1.988 billion for 2015, wider fromthe net loss of $777 million in 2014 and the $513 million net lossin 2013.

At Dec. 31, 2015, the Company had total assets of $11.02 billionagainst $10.1 billion in total liabilities, and stockholders'equity of $919 million.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 29, 2016, appointed sevencreditors of Peabody Energy Corp. to serve on the officialcommittee of unsecured creditors. The Committee retained Morrison& Foerster LLP as counsel, Spencer Fane LLP as local counsel,Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as conflicts counsel,Blackacre LLC as its independent expert, and Berkeley ResearchGroup, LLC, as financial advisor.

According to Law360, Oakley claims that it holds trademark rightsto some of the Debtor's products included in the sale. TheDebtor's brand Bauer uses Oakley's patent- and trademark-protectedvisors in its hockey helmets, the report states, citing Oakley.

Law360 recalls that the Debtor and Oakley were parties to a patentlicense agreement which expired last summer and was notrenegotiated.

About Performance Sports

Exeter, N.H.-based Performance Sports Group Ltd. (NYSE: PSG) (TSX:PSG) -- http://www.PerformanceSportsGroup.com/-- is a developer and manufacturer of ice hockey, roller hockey, lacrosse, baseballand softball sports equipment, as well as related apparel andsoccer apparel. Its products are marketed under the BAUER,MISSION, MAVERIK, CASCADE, INARIA, COMBAT and EASTON brand namesand are distributed by sales representatives and independentdistributors throughout the world. In addition, the Companydistributes its hockey products through its Burlington,Massachusetts and Bloomington, Minnesota Own The Moment HockeyExperience retail stores.

On Oct. 31, 2016, Performance Sports Group Ltd. and certain of itsaffiliates have filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of theBankruptcy Code in the District of Delaware and commencedproceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act in theOntario Superior Court of Justice.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, has appointedthree creditors of BPS US Holdings, Inc., parent of PerformanceSports, to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors.

The Creditors' Committee retained by Blank Rome LLP as counsel,Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP as Canadian co-counsel, and ProvinceInc. as financial advisor.

The U.S. Trustee also has appointed a official committee of equitysecurity holders. The equity committee is represented by NatalieD. Ramsey, Esq., and Mark A. Fink, Esq., at Montgomery, McCracken,Walker & Rhoads, LLP; and Robert J. Stark, Esq., Steven B. Levine,Esq., James W. Stoll, Esq., and Andrew M. Carty, Esq., at BrownRudnick LLP.

PREFERRED CONCRETE: April 19 Combined Plan, Disclosures Hearing---------------------------------------------------------------Judge Thomas M. Lynch of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the NorthernDistrict of Illinois will convene a combined hearing on April 19,2017, at 1:00 p.m., to consider approval of the amended disclosurestatement and the confirmation of the amended plan filed byPreferred Concrete & Excavating, Inc., dated Jan. 10, 2017.

March 8, 2017 is set as the last date for filing and servingwritten objections to the disclosure statement.

March 8, 2017 is set as the last day for filing ballots acceptingor rejecting the plan.

March 8, 2017 is set as the last date for filing and servingwritten objections to confirmation.

The TCR previously reported that under the plan, unsecuredcreditors will get 10% in equal semiannual installments for a totalof 10 payments.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is availablefor free at:

Preferred Concrete & Excavating, Inc., is a union concrete contractor engaged in concrete in construction in Northern Illinois and surrounding areas for the past 14 years. The Debtorhas approximately 10 employees.

Preferred Concrete filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 16-81114) on May 4, 2016. The petition was signed by Gerald Hartman, president. The Debtor is represented by O. Allan Fridman, Esq., at the Law Office of O.Allan Fridman.

The Debtor estimated assets at $0 to $50,000 and liabilities at $100,000 to $500,000 at the time of the filing.

PRESTIGE INDUSTRIES: Feb. 10 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel-----------------------------------------------------------------Andy Vara, United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold anorganizational meeting on Feb. 10, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in thebankruptcy case of Prestige Industries LLC.

The meeting will be held at:

The Doubletree Hotel 700 King Street Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee orcommittees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuantto Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code. A representative of theDebtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and providebackground information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trusteeappoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable. The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor ofthe kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee mayconsult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its businessoperations and participate in the formulation of a plan ofreorganization. The Committee may also perform other services asare in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom itrepresents.

Prestige was founded by Joe Cho with the purchase of a retaillaundry and dry cleaning facility in Manhattan in 1995. The Debtoracquired its first linen cleaning facility in Bay Shore, New Yorkin 2005, however, Prestige remained a predominantly retailoperation through 2006.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor employs approximately 582individuals. The Debtor serves over 90 customers ranging frompremium hotel chains to signature boutique hotels.

To enable the Debtor to reduce the adverse effects of thecommencement of this Chapter 11 case on its organization, theDebtor has requested various types of relief in its "first day"motions and applications. The Debtor is seeking court permissionto, among other things, pay employee obligations, use existing bankaccounts, obtain post-petition financing, and prohibit utilitycompanies from discontinuing services.

"The First Day Motions seek relief intended to allow the Debtor toeffectively transition into Chapter 11 and minimize disruption,thereby preserving and maximizing the value of the Debtor'sestate," Mr. Fung maintained.

The material provisions of the Wells Debtor-in-possessionAgreement, among others, are:

(1) DIP Lender: Wells Fargo Bank

(2) DIP Facility Amount: A maximum amount outstanding of$5,200,000, which represents no change in the maximum amount of thepre-petition credit facility, and which may be drawn by the Debtorin periodic advances limited by an availability formula. TheDebtor seeks interim approval to borrow up to $725,000 in additionto the current loan balance of approximately $3,275,000.

(3) Interest Rate: The effective non-default interest rate isthe prime rate plus 2% on line of credit advances and the primerate plus 2.5% on the term loan obligations.

(4) Repayment of Loan: The Debtor agrees to repay in full alloutstanding principal amounts of the Loan on the Maturity Datewhich is the earliest to occur of:

(a) June 30, 2017;

(b) 30 days after the entry of the Interim FinancingOrder if the Permanent Financing Order has not been entered priorto the expiration of such 30-day period;

(c) the effective date of a plan of reorganization filedin the Chapter 11 Case pursuant to an Order entered by theBankruptcy Court;

(d) the date the Bankruptcy Court orders the conversionof the bankruptcy case of any Debtor to a Chapter 7;

(e) the date the DIP Agreement is otherwise terminatedfor any reason whatsoever, pursuant to the terms of the DIPAgreement;

(f) subject to the Financing Order, the acceleration ofthe Obligations or termination of the Commitments, includingwithout limitation, as a result of the occurrence of an Event ofDefault; and

(g) the sale of all or substantially all of theDebtors’ assets.

(5) Carve-Out: Consists of:

(i) all allowed administrative expenses, for feesrequired to be paid to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court and forfees payable to the Office of the United States Trustee;

(ii) all reasonable fees and expenses up to $5,000incurred by a trustee under Section 726(b) of the Bankruptcy Code;

(iii) to the extent allowed by the Bankruptcy Court at anytime, whether by interim order, procedural order, or otherwise, allfees, disbursements, costs and expenses of the Professionalsincurred in an aggregate amount not to exceed $50,000.

(6) Use of Proceeds: The proceeds of the Loan may be used onlyto the extent provided for in the Budget, as may be permitted bythe Loan Documents, and as authorized by the Bankruptcy Court andconsented to by the Lender for:

(i) general working capital needs;

(ii) the repayment of the Obligations; and

(iii) the payment of fees, expenses, and costs incurredby Lender in connection with this Ratification Agreement and theChapter 11 Case.

(7) Grant of Security Interest: Substantially all of theDebtor’s pre-petition and post-petition assets; provided,however, that the collateral will include causes of action underSections 542, 544, 545, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552 and 553 of theBankruptcy Code, only upon entry of a permanent financing order. All obligations to the Lender are secured by a first prioritysecurity interest and superpriority administrative expense, subjectto the Carve-Out.

(3) Interest Rates: The non-default interest rate ranges from6% to 9.5% and the default rate is 1.5% per month.

(4) Final Order: The Lender will provide the loan only afterthe entry of the Final Order.

(5) Carve-Out: Consists of:

(i) all allowed administrative expenses for fees requiredto be paid to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court and for feespayable to the Office of the United States Trustee;

(ii) all reasonable fees and expenses up to $5,000incurred by a trustee under Section 726(b) of the Bankruptcy Code;

(iii) to the extent allowed by the Bankruptcy Court atany time, whether by interim order, procedural order, or otherwise,all fees, disbursements, costs and expenses of the Professionalsincurred in an aggregate amount not to exceed $250,000.

(6) Grant of Security Interest: Substantially all of theDebtor’s pre-petition and post- petition assets; provided,however, that the collateral will include causes of action underSections 542, 544, 545, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552 and 553 of theBankruptcy Code. All obligations to the Lender are secured by afirst priority security interest and superpriority administrativeexpense, subject to the Carve-Out.

The Debtor relates that substantially all of its assets are alsosubject to a security interest in favor of Medley CapitalCorporation, as agent for itself and St. Cloud Capital Partners II,L.P.

The Debtor relates that absent the ability to obtaindebtor-in-possession financing and use cash collateral, the Debtorwill not be able to pay insurance, wages, rent, utility charges,and other critical operating expenses. The Debtor further relatesthat without access to cash collateral, the Debtor will not be ableto maintain their business operations and continue theirrestructuring efforts, and would likely be forced to ceaseoperations and liquidate.

The proposed Budget for the Wells Fargo DIP Facility provides fortotal disbursements in the amount of $6,555,174 for the periodbeginning on the week ending January 29, 2017 through March 26,2017.

The Debtor proposes to grant the Lenders security equivalent to alien granted under section 364(c)(2) and (3) and 364(d) of theBankruptcy Code, in and upon the Debtor's property and the cashcollateral, whether such property was acquired before or after thePetition Date, to the extent provided in the Wells DIP Agreement.

As adequate protection for any diminution in value of MedleyCapital Corporation's interests, the Debtor requests that the Courtgrant Medley Capital Corporation security equivalent to a liengranted under section 364(c)(2) and (3) of the Bankruptcy Code inand upon the Debtor’s property and the cash collateral, whethersuch property was acquired before or after the Petition Date, whichliens shall be junior and subordinate to the liens of the DIPLenders.

The Rosenthal DIP Agreement provides for the following PlanMilestones:

(1) On or before July 1, 2017, Debtor will (i) finalize anddeliver to Lender a business plan, (ii) deliver to Lender a draftplan of reorganization and (iii) deliver to Lender a draftdisclosure statement, each in form and substance acceptable toLender;

(2) On or before August 1, 2017, Debtor will file with theBankruptcy Court a proposed Acceptable Reorganization Plan;

(3) On or before September 1, 2017, Debtor will obtainapproval of a disclosure statement in form and substance acceptableto Lender;

(4) On or before October 1, 2017, Debtor will commencesolicitation of acceptances for an Acceptable Reorganization Planpursuant to a disclosure statement and solicitation proceduresapproved by the Bankruptcy Court that are in form and substanceacceptable to Lender;

(5) On or before November 15, 2017, the Debtor will obtainentry of an order of the Bankruptcy Court confirming an AcceptableReorganization Plan, which order will be in form and substanceacceptable to Lender; and

(6) On or before November 30, 2017, the effective date of anAcceptable Reorganization Plan will have occurred and the orderconfirming the Acceptable Reorganization Plan will not have beenamended, modified, supplemented other than as agreed in writing byLender.

The Rosenthal DIP provides for the following Sale Milestones:

(1) No later than 10 days following a Milestone Default orOther Default, the Debtor will file a motion, in form and substancesatisfactory to Lender, requesting approval from the BankruptcyCourt to retain a nationally-recognized investment banking firmacceptable to Lender on terms and conditions acceptable to Lenderin its discretion to conduct the marketing and sale process for allor substantially all of the assets of Borrower.

(2) No later than 20 days following a Milestone Default orOther Default, the Bankruptcy Court will have entered an order, inform and substance satisfactory to Lender, authorizing theretention of the Investment Banker on terms and conditionsacceptable to Agent in its discretion.

(3) No later than 20 days days following a Milestone Defaultor Other Default, Debtor will obtain the entry of an order of theBankruptcy Court, in form and substance satisfactory to Lender (i)approving the bidding procedures for the sale of all orsubstantially all of the Debtor’s assets in accordance withSection 363 of the Bankruptcy Code including, without limitation, aform of asset purchase agreement acceptable to Lender in its solediscretion, and (ii) providing that all cash proceeds generated bysuch Sale, less reasonable out of pocket fees, costs and expensesdirectly arising from the closing of such Sale, subject to approvalby Lender will be remitted to Lender for application against, andin permanent reduction of, the Maximum Credit Facility

(4) Not later than 45 days following a Milestone Default orOther Default, the Debtor will have entered into an agreement inform and substance acceptable to Lender with a stalking horsebidder, reasonably acceptable to Lender, committing to purchase allor substantially all of the Debtor’s assets.

(5) No later than 70 days following a Milestone Default orOther Default, Debtor will conduct an auction, in accordance withthe Bid Procedures Order, if more than one bona fide offer isreceived meeting the conditions set forth in the Bid ProceduresOrder;

(6) Not later than two Business Days after the Auction, theBankruptcy Court will have entered an Order, which will providefor, among other things, distribution of sale proceeds to Lender ina minimum cash amount not less than the amount required to satisfythe Obligations owed to Lender, and otherwise in form and substancesatisfactory to Lender, approving the sale or sales of all orsubstantially of the Debtor’s assets, on terms and conditionsacceptable to Lender, and authorizing and directing that allproceeds from the Sale be remitted to Lender for applicationagainst and permanent reduction of the Obligations.

(7) Not later than two Business Days after the Sale Order isentered, the closing of the Bankruptcy Court-approved Sale willhave occurred.

(8) Debtor confirms, acknowledges and agrees thatnotwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the DIPAgreement, any failure to comply with the requirements set forth inSection 8.2 of the DIP Agreement will constitute an additionalimmediate Event of Default under this Agreement.

Prestige Industries LLC, based in North Bergen, New Jersey, filed achapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 17-10186) on January30, 2017. The petition was signed by Jonathan Fung, CEO/CFO. TheDebtor is represented by Peter C. Hughes, Esq., at Dilworth PaxsonLLP. The Debtor engaged SSG Advisors, LLC as its investmentbanker. The case is assigned to Judge Kevin Gross. The Debtorestimated assets and debt at $10 million to $50 million at the timeof the filing.

PROGRESSIVE ACUTE: Can Continue Cash Use Until March 17-------------------------------------------------------Judge Robert Summerhays of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theWestern District of Louisiana authorized Progressive Acute Care,LLC and its affiliated Debtors to use Business First Bank's cashcollateral.

Business First Bank was granted perfected liens and securityinterests on the Debtors' post-petition properties of the kind,nature, and in the same priority that Business First Bank held inthe Debtors' pre-petition property.

Business First Bank was granted an allowed super-priorityadministrative claim over any and all other obligations,liabilities and indebtedness of the Debtors, to the extent that thecash collateral will result in diminution of the value, subject tothe Carve-Out.

The Debtors were directed to continue to provide Business FirstBank and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors with areport detailing the expenditures made and the use of the cashcollateral, and produce all financial statements, reports, andother documents required under the Loan Documents.

The Debtors were authorized to use cash collateral until theearliest to occur of:

(a) March 17, 2017;

(b) the payment in full or refinance of all of the Debtors'obligations under the Loan Documents in their entirety,

(ii) the Debtors' failure to comply with any terms,covenants, provisions, or agreements contained in the LoanDocuments;

(iii) the entry of an order dismissing any of theDebtors' Chapter 11 cases, or converting any of the Debtors'Chapter 11 cases to one under Chapter 7, or appointing a Chapter 11trustee, chief responsible officer, or examiner;

(iv) if, on an aggregate cumulative basis, cashdisbursements exceed the cash disbursements projected in theBudget, however, that there will be an allowed 15% variance to theaggregate cumulative amount of cash disbursements; or,

(v) if the Court has not entered a final order (or aneighth extended Interim Order) with respect to the Motion on orbefore March 17, 2017.

The final hearing on the further use of cash collateral isscheduled on March 14, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. The deadline for thefiling of objections to the further use of cash collateral is seton March 7, 2017.

A full-text copy of the Seventh Consent Order, dated January 31,2017, is available at https://is.gd/nmiVKk

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Budget, dated January 31, 2017, isavailable at https://is.gd/kwljP3

Henry Hobbs, Jr., acting U.S. Trustee for Region 5, on Dec. 20,2016, added Dawn Yarnall and Ryan Domengeaux to the OfficialCommittee of Unsecured Creditors of Progressive Acute Care, LLC. As reported by the TCR on June 24, 2016, the Acting U.S. Trustee onJune 21 appointed three creditors to serve on the Committee,namely: Christopher Lehmann, Lifeshare Blood Centers and OmegaDiagnostics.

QUINN'S JUNCTION: Court OKs Cash Collateral Use Through April 30----------------------------------------------------------------Judge Joel T. Marker of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Districtof Utah authorized Quinn's Junction Properties, LC and its propertymanager, Park City Film Studios Development Company, LC, also knownas PCFS, to use cash collateral from Feb. 1, 2017 through April 30,2017.

The approved Budget provided for total estimated cash expendituresof $124,240 for the months of February through April.

Judge Marker prohibited the Debtor and PCFS from paying anyadministrative claims for professional fees or expenses ofprofessional, or repay any amounts borrowed from R3MediaCorporation, from cash collateral unless specifically authorized topay such claims or repay such borrowings, pursuant to further Orderof the Court.

The Debtor and PCFS were directed to provide reasonable accountingsof their expenditures of cash collateral under the Budget uponrequest.

Quinn's Junction Properties, LC, filed a chapter 11 petition(Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 16-24458) on May 23, 2016. The petitionwas signed by Michael Martin, chief restructuring officer. Thecase is assigned to Judge Joel T. Marker. At the time of filing,the Debtor estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of$10 million to $50 million.

The Debtor is managing its assets and properties asdebtor-in-possession. No trustee or examiner has been appointed,and no official committee of creditors or equity interest holdershas yet been established.

RALSTON-LIPPINCOTT: CKI Asks for Court OK to Use Cash Collateral----------------------------------------------------------------Debtor CKI, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the SouthernDistrict of New York for authorization to use cash collateral.

The Debtor contends that it needs to use the revenues from itsfuneral service business, and the rents from its Greenwood LakeProperty, to pay necessary business expenses, including thenecessary carrying costs of the Greenwood Lake Property, which islocated at 4 Oak Street, Greenwood Lake, New York. The Debtorfurther contends that its loan agreements with prepetition securedlender Orange Bank & Trust Company, f/k/a Orange County TrustCompany, include assignments of rents, which purport to broadlydefine all of the Debtor’s operating revenue as rents.

The Debtor's proposed monthly Budget for the Greenwood LakeProperty provides for total expenses in the amount of $11,200.

The Debtor recounts it had obtained prepetition financing togetherwith its affiliated Debtors Ralston-Lippincott-Hasbrouck-IngrassiaFuneral Home, Inc., Lippincott-Ingrassia Funeral Home, Inc., andLippincott Funeral Chapel, Inc., from Orange Bank. As participantsin the Loan, each of the Debtors guaranteed the obligations of theothers, and pledged their property as further collateral for theirguarantee. The Debtor further relates that the loan balance as ofthe Petition Date is approximately $2.1 million.

The Debtor proposes to provide Orange Bank with:

(1) replacement liens, to the extent of such liens before thePetition Date;

(2) the payment of contractual monthly mortgage installments,including escrows for taxes and insurance; and

(3) financial reporting in the form of the Debtor's monthlyoperating reports as required by the Office of the United StatesTrustee.

REDSKINS GRILLE: Wants to Use First Republic Cash Collateral------------------------------------------------------------Redskins Grille 1, LLC d/b/a Hail & Hog Kitchen and Tap seeksauthorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the EasternDistrict of Virginia to use cash collateral.

The Debtor intends to use cash collateral to pay reasonable andnecessary general operating and administrative expenses during theDebtor's reorganization. The Debtor contends that it has engagedin reasonable exploration of the availability of alternate credit,however it is unable to obtain post-petition credit.

First Republic Bank has a perfected security interest in theDebtor's cash collateral in the amount of $7,332, and post-petitionproceeds from sale of other collateral.

The Debtor proposes to grant First Republic Bank a replacement lienin post-petition cash collateral. The Debtor further proposes togrant First Republic Bank a continuing lien over substantially allof Debtor's assets and third-party guaranties.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated January 31, 2017, isavailable at https://is.gd/bNffps

About Redskins Grille 1, LLC

Redskins Grille 1, LLC d/b/a Hail & Hog Kitchen and Tap filed aChapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 17-10102), on January10, 2017. The petition was signed by Robert E. Burness, ManagingMember. The case is assigned to Judge Robert G. Mayer. The Debtoris represented by Roy M. Terry, Jr., Esq., at Sands Anderson PC. At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilitiesat $1 million to $10 million each.

RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL: 2nd Cir. Court Affirms Ruling on Barry Mack----------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Sullivan, writing for Law360, reports that the U.S. Courtof Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed a ruling that BarryMack, whose wife, Cheryl, died in 2013 of causes linked to her 2009suicide attempt under the stress of losing their Naples home, isexcluded from winning damages against Residential Capital LLC'sborrower claims trust due to a faulty address on a letterchallenging a wrongful foreclosure. Law360 recalls that Mr. Macktold the Second Circuit earlier in January that he should not bebarred from recovering damages.

ResCap, one of the country's largest mortgage originators andservicers, was sent to Chapter 11 with 50 subsidiaries amid"continuing industry challenges, rising litigation costs andclaims, and regulatory uncertainty," according to a companystatement.

Judge Martin Glenn in December 2013 confirmed the Joint Chapter 11Plan co-proposed by Residential Capital and the Official Committeeof Unsecured Creditors.

* * *

The ResCap Liquidating Trust was established in December 2013 underthe Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Residential Capital,LLC, et al., to liquidate and distribute assets of the debtors inthe ResCap bankruptcy case. The Trust maintains a website atwww.rescapliquidatingtrust.com, which Unitholders are urged toconsult, where Unitholders may obtain information concerning theTrust, including current developments.

RICHARD DODDS: Wightman Buying Craig Property for $300K-------------------------------------------------------Richard John Dodds and Cheryl Ann Dodds ask the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the District of Colorado to authorize the sale ofresidential real estate located at 37399 North Highway 13, Craig,Colorado, outside the ordinary course of business, to Kenneth A.Wightman for $300,000.

On the Petition Date, the Debtors owned the Craig Property. Theyscheduled the value of the Craig Property as $625,000. The CraigProperty consists of two parcels: (i) a parcel of approximately 22acres with a residential home on the property ("Craig Residence");and (ii) an adjacent parcel of approximately 8 acres which is acommercial property ("Craig Commercial"). Prior to and on thePetition Date, the Debtors used the Craig Residence as theirprimary residence. The Debtors conducted commercial operations onthe Craig Commercial property, including their fishing and huntingexpeditions.

The Craig Residence is subject to these recorded liens andencumbrances:

a. A deed of trust dated Aug. 18, 2015 for the benefit ofBorder State Bank to secure the sum of $600,000, recorded with theMoffat County Clerk and Recorder on Aug. 12, 2015 at Reception No.20152666.

b. A Transcript of Judgment in favor of Turning PointManagement, Inc., against the Debtors and Elkorn Outfitters, Inc.,in the sum of $7,560 dated June 8, 2015, which was recorded withthe Moffat County Clerk and Recorder on Oct. 13, 2015, at ReceptionNo. 20153269.

c. A Transcript of Judgment in favor of Ford Motor CreditCo., LLC against Mr. Dodds, in the amount of $6,821, dated Jan. 28,2015, recorded with the Moffat County Clerk and Recorder on March3, 2015, at Reception No. 20150846.

d. A Notice of Federal Tax Lien for the Internal RevenueService on behalf of the SBA, in the amount of $31,496, dated Oct.27, 2011, recorded with the Moffat County Clerk and Recorder onNov. 7, 2011, at Reception No. 20116767.

Upon information and belief, these are the real estate taxes owedfor Craig Residence:

a. For the tax year 2015, the sum of $1,651;

b. For the tax year 2016, the Debtors estimate that the sum of$1,460; and

c. While not yet due and owing, there will be real propertytaxes accruing against the Craig Residence for 2017. The Debtors'pro-rated share of the estimated 2017 taxes are approximately,$180, assuming an estimated closing date of Feb. 15, 2017.

According to the proof of claim filed by Border State Bank, theamount owed to them is $615,079. However, this claim is alsosecured by other real property as follows:

The Debtors assert that following a refinancing with Border StateBank in August of 2015, all senior liens and encumbrances againstthe Craig Residence were satisfied, including all judgment liens,tax liens, etc.

As to the lien of Turning Point Management, the Debtors assert thatthis debt was satisfied at the time of the financing with BorderState Bank, and therefore is no longer owing and should bereleased. The Debtors have contacted Turning Point Management whowill be providing a release for the closing of the sale.

As to the junior lien of Ford Motor Credit Co., the Debtors paidsuch lien upon the sale of the vehicle. Thus, Ford Motor Credit'slien should be released. However, the release was never properlyrecorded prepetition. The counsel for the Debtors have advisedcounsel for Ford Motor Credit.

As of the filing of the Motion, the cooperation of counsel FordMotor Credit has not been forthcoming.

The IRS filed a proof of claim asserting that $33,020 of its claimwas secured, based upon its recording of the Notice of Levy withthe Clerk and Recorder of Moffat County, Colorado. The Debtorsdispute the secured claim of the IRS. The Debtors made multipleattempts to contact the IRS concerning their claim in thebankruptcy case. The IRS has yet to do the Debtors the courtesy ofreturning their communications. The Debtors will therefore escrow$33,020 from the proceeds of the sale of the Craig Residence withLand Title who will hold such sums pending further order of theCourt.

As such, the Debtors dispute all liens other than the lien ofBorder State Bank.

The Debtors received an interest to buy the Craig Residence fromthe Buyer. After negotiation, the Debtors and the Buyer enteredinto a Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate to sell the CraigResidence to the Buyer for the sum of $300,000. Under the Contractto Sell the Craig Residence, the Debtors will receive $300,000 forthe property minus the costs of sale, closing costs, title fees,recording fees, etc. The sale to the Buyer is conditioned on anorder from the Court approving the sale.

The Debtors propose to sell the Craig Residence outside theordinary course of business and free and clear of any liens andother interests in such property of entities other than the estateif any, to the Buyer pursuant to the Contract for the sum of$300,000. The Debtors negotiated the purchase price with the Buyerat arm's-length.

A copy of the Contract to Sell attached to the Motion is availablefor free at:

From the proceeds of the sale to the Buyer, the Debtor will paythese: (i) all real estate taxes - $3,291; (ii) IRS tax lien(escrowed) -$33,020; (iii) miscellaneous closing costs, title fees,recording fees, etc. - $10,000; (iv) Border State Bank - $253,689. This amount will allow the Debtors to pay the lien of Border StateBank. No distribution will be made on account of the judgmentliens or other encumbrances. The anticipated closing date isimmediately following entry of a Court Order approving the sale. Time is of the essence as the Buyer must close on the purchase ofthe Craig Residence no later than Feb. 12, 2017.

The Debtors assert that there are sound business reasons forselling the Craig Residence and that the sale of such propertypursuant to the Contract to Sell upon approval of the Motion is inthe best interest of the bankruptcy estate and the creditorsbecause the sale will allow the Debtors to pay the claim of BorderState Bank.

The Debtors also intend to sell the Craig Commercial following theclosing of the sale of the Craig Residence. The Debtors havenegotiated a purchase of the Craig Commercial for the price of$350,000. Should the Court also approve the sale of the CraigCommercial, the Debtors estimate that after satisfying the claim ofBorder State Bank, there will be excess proceeds available for allunsecured and priority creditors in the case.

Pursuant to a prior Stipulation between the Debtors and BorderState Bank, following the sale of the Craig Commercial property,Border State Bank has agreed that the Debtors may escrow an amountsufficient to satisfy all of the priority unsecured creditors andgeneral unsecured creditors, approximately $166,525, from the saleof such property. Such escrowed funds shall not be subject to anylien held by Border State Bank. Notwithstanding the foregoing, inthe event that the Proof of Claim No. 13 is not satisfied in full,Border State Bank reserves its right to assert a claim against allor a portion of the escrowed funds in order to satisfy anydeficiency owed to it.

In order to consummate the sale of the Craig Residence inaccordance with the terms of the Contract to Sell, the Debtors askthat the Court suspend the operation of Fed.R.Bankr.P. 6004(h),which automatically stays for 10 days an Order authorizing the use,sale or lease of property other than cash collateral.

ROJO FIVE: Simon Buying All Assets for $50K-------------------------------------------Rojo Five, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the EasternDistrict of Michigan to authorize the private sale of substantiallyall assets to Steve Simon for $50,000.

On Oct. 20, 2016, the Debtors filed a voluntary petition for reliefunder chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors' principalplaces of business assets are located in Rochester, Michigan; Novi,Michigan; Sterling Heights, Michigan; and Birmingham, Michigan. The Debtors now have possession of their assets and plan to managethe affairs of their estate as a debtor in possession in accordancewith 11 U.S.C. Sections 1107 and 1108. The Debtors have all of therights and powers of a trustee in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C.Section 1107(a).

Debtor Rojo One conducts business out of Novi, Michigan as DuelNovi and operates as a dueling piano bar. Debtor Rojo Two conductsbusiness out of Rochester, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro andoperates as a restaurant. Debtor Rojo Four conducts business outof Sterling Heights, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and operatesas a restaurant. Debtor Rojo Five conducts business out ofBirmingham, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and Sidecar Slider Barand operates as 2 restaurants. Debtor Rojo Six conducts businessout of Novi, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and Michigan BeerCompany and operates as 2 restaurants.

Since July 2016, Thomas Hospitality Group was engaged by the Rojoownership to market the 5 existing restaurants. Thomas Hospitalityspecializes in restaurants, bars and nightclubs, and its employeesare specifically experienced in this industry and have personalcontacts with many of the key players in the hospitality industry.

Thomas Hospitality's marketing efforts have focused on presentingeach of the restaurant sites on its Web site. Thomas Hospitalitythen fields calls from people who have visited its site; haveexecuted a confidentiality agreement; and have discussed theiroperational needs and locations of interest. Parallel to themarketing done through the Thomas Hospitality Web site,advertisements are placed on Loopnet and on BizBuySell, a Web sitethat focuses on businesses for sale that may not have a real estatecomponent, and advertisements are placed in the Detroit News.

Thomas Hospitality performed a valuation report of the Debtor. The value as determined by Thomas Hospitality is that the value iszero since all personal property is leased by the Debtor.

On Jan. 17, 2017, the Debtor and the Purchaser entered into Letterof Intent to Purchase. The purchase price for the property is$50,000 plus certain cure costs associated with the Debtor'sassumption and assignment. The purchase price is subject toincrease or decrease on account of certain prorations andadjustments customarily prorated between a purchaser and a sellerof similar assets. The Purchaser has made a good faith deposit inthe amount of $5,000 which will be credited to the purchase priceat closing.

Except for certain cost to be paid by the Purchaser pursuant to theAgreement certain other costs to be paid by the Purchaser, theAgreement requires that the Debtor deliver the Property toPurchaser free and clear of all liens, claims, interests andencumbrances. The consummation of the proposed sale to thePurchaser is conditioned, among other things set forth the entry ofa Sale Order approving the sale by the Court; assignment of theexisting lease to the Purchaser.

A copy of the Agreement and the valuation report attached to theMotion is available for free at:

The Debtor has concluded, in its business judgment, that the saleof the property to the Buyer will result in the highest and bestvalue for the property, and that the sale of the property is in thebest interests of the Debtor, the Debtor's estate, and itscreditors; therefore approval of the sale and the Agreement iswarranted.

The Debtor asks the authority to sell the property free and clearof all liens, claims, interests and other encumbrances. All liens,claims, interests and other encumbrances in and against theproperty will attach to the proceeds from the sale to the sameextent, priority and validity that existed on the Petition Date.

The Debtors' cases were procedurally consolidated and are jointlyadministered. The cases are assigned to Judge Maria L. Oxholm.

The Debtors each estimated assets at $0 to $50,000. All theDebtors, except for Rojo Five, estimated liabilities at $500,000to$1 million. Rojo Five estimated its liabilities at $1 million to$10 million.

ROJO FOUR: Dudzinskii Buying All Assets for $20K------------------------------------------------Rojo Four, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the EasternDistrict of Michigan to authorize the private sale of substantiallyall assets to John Dudzinskii for $20,000.

On Oct. 20, 2016, the Debtors filed a voluntary petition for reliefunder chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors' principalplaces of business assets are located in Rochester, Michigan; Novi,Michigan; Sterling Heights, Michigan; and Birmingham, Michigan. The Debtors now have possession of their assets and plan to managethe affairs of their estate as a debtor in possession in accordancewith 11 U.S.C. Sections 1107 and 1108. The Debtors have all of therights and powers of a trustee in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C.Section 1107(a).

Debtor Rojo One conducts business out of Novi, Michigan as DuelNovi and operates as a dueling piano bar. Debtor Rojo Two conductsbusiness out of Rochester, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro andoperates as a restaurant. Debtor Rojo Four conducts business outof Sterling Heights, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and operatesas a restaurant. Debtor Rojo Five conducts business out ofBirmingham, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and Sidecar Slider Barand operates as 2 restaurants. Debtor Rojo Six conducts businessout of Novi, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and Michigan BeerCompany and operates as 2 restaurants.

Since July 2016, Thomas Hospitality Group was engaged by the Rojoownership to market the 5 existing restaurants. Thomas Hospitalityspecializes in restaurants, bars and nightclubs, and its employeesare specifically experienced in this industry and have personalcontacts with many of the key players in the hospitality industry.

Thomas Hospitality's marketing efforts have focused on presentingeach of the restaurant sites on its Web site. Thomas Hospitalitythen fields calls from people who have visited its site; haveexecuted a confidentiality agreement; and have discussed theiroperational needs and locations of interest. Parallel to themarketing done through the Thomas Hospitality Web site,advertisements are placed on Loopnet and on BizBuySell, a Web sitethat focuses on businesses for sale that may not have a real estatecomponent, and advertisements are placed in the Detroit News. Thomas Hospitality performed a valuation report of the Debtor.

On Jan. 31, 2017, the Debtor and the Purchaser entered into Letterof Intent to Purchase. The purchase price for the property is$20,000 plus certain cure costs associated with the Debtor'sassumption and assignment. The purchase price is subject toincrease or decrease on account of certain prorations andadjustments customarily prorated between a purchaser and a sellerof similar assets. The Purchaser has made a good faith deposit inthe amount of $5,000 which will be credited to the purchase priceat closing.

Except for certain cost to be paid by the Purchaser pursuant to theAgreement certain other costs to be paid by the Purchaser, theAgreement requires that the Debtor deliver the Property toPurchaser free and clear of all liens, claims, interests andencumbrances. The consummation of the proposed sale to thePurchaser is conditioned, among other things set forth the entry ofa Sale Order approving the sale by the Court; assignment of theexisting lease to the Purchaser.

A copy of the Agreement and the valuation report attached to theMotion is available for free at:

The Debtor has concluded, in its business judgment, that the saleof the property to the Buyer will result in the highest and bestvalue for the property, and that the sale of the property is in thebest interests of the Debtor, the Debtor's estate, and itscreditors; therefore approval of the sale and the Agreement iswarranted.

The Debtor asks the authority to sell the property free and clearof all liens, claims, interests and other encumbrances. All liens,claims, interests and other encumbrances in and against theproperty will attach to the proceeds from the sale to the sameextent, priority and validity that existed on the Petition Date.

The Debtors' cases were procedurally consolidated and are jointlyadministered. The cases are assigned to Judge Maria L. Oxholm.

The Debtors each estimated assets at $0 to $50,000. All theDebtors, except for Rojo Five, estimated liabilities at $500,000to$1 million. Rojo Five estimated its liabilities at $1 million to$10 million.

ROJO ONE: Zdravkovski Buying All Assets for $81K------------------------------------------------Rojo One, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the EasternDistrict of Michigan to authorize the private sale of substantiallyall assets to Robert Zdravkovski for $81,000.

On Oct. 20, 2016, the Debtors filed a voluntary petition for reliefunder chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors' principalplaces of business assets are located in Rochester, Michigan; Novi,Michigan; Sterling Heights, Michigan; and Birmingham, Michigan. The Debtors now have possession of their assets and plan to managethe affairs of their estate as a debtor in possession in accordancewith 11 U.S.C. Sections 1107 and 1108. The Debtors have all of therights and powers of a trustee in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C.Section 1107(a).

Debtor Rojo One conducts business out of Novi, Michigan as DuelNovi and operates as a dueling piano bar. Debtor Rojo Two conductsbusiness out of Rochester, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro andoperates as a restaurant. Debtor Rojo Four conducts business outof Sterling Heights, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and operatesas a restaurant. Debtor Rojo Five conducts business out ofBirmingham, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and Sidecar Slider Barand operates as 2 restaurants. Debtor Rojo Six conducts businessout of Novi, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and Michigan BeerCompany and operates as 2 restaurants.

Since July 2016, Thomas Hospitality Group was engaged by the Rojoownership to market the 5 existing restaurants. Thomas Hospitalityspecializes in restaurants, bars and nightclubs, and its employeesare specifically experienced in this industry and have personalcontacts with many of the key players in the hospitality industry.

Thomas Hospitality's marketing efforts have focused on presentingeach of the restaurant sites on its Web site. Thomas Hospitalitythen fields calls from people who have visited its site; haveexecuted a confidentiality agreement; and have discussed theiroperational needs and locations of interest. Parallel to themarketing done through the Thomas Hospitality Web site,advertisements are placed on Loopnet and on BizBuySell, a Web sitethat focuses on businesses for sale that may not have a real estatecomponent, and advertisements are placed in the Detroit News. Thomas Hospitality performed a valuation report of the Debtor.

On Jan. 17, 2017, the Debtor and the Buyer entered into Letter ofIntent to Purchase. The purchase price for the property is $81,000plus certain cure costs associated with the Debtor's assumption andassignment. The purchase price is subject to increase or decreaseon account of certain prorations and adjustments customarilyprorated between a purchaser and a seller of similar assets. TheBuyer has made a good faith deposit in the amount of $5,000 whichwill be credited to the purchase price at Closing. Except forcertain cost to be paid by the Buyer pursuant to the Agreementcertain other costs to be paid by the Buyer, the Agreement requiresthat the Debtor deliver the property to the Buyer free and clear ofall liens, claims, interests and Encumbrances. The consummation ofthe proposed sale to the Buyer is conditioned, among other thingsset forth the entry of a Sale Order approving the sale by theBankruptcy Court; assignment of the existing lease to the Buyer.

A copy of the Agreement and the valuation report attached to theMotion is available for free at:

The Debtor has concluded, in its business judgment, that the saleof the property to the Buyer will result in the highest and bestvalue for the property, and that the sale of the property is in thebest interests of the Debtor, the Debtor's estate, and itscreditors; therefore approval of the sale and the Agreement iswarranted.

The Debtor asks the authority to sell the property free and clearof all liens, claims, interests and other encumbrances. All liens,claims, interests and other encumbrances in and against theproperty will attach to the proceeds from the sale to the sameextent, priority and validity that existed on the Petition Date.

The Debtors' cases were procedurally consolidated and are jointlyadministered. The cases are assigned to Judge Maria L. Oxholm.

The Debtors each estimated assets at $0 to $50,000. All theDebtors, except for Rojo Five, estimated liabilities at $500,000to$1 million. Rojo Five estimated its liabilities at $1 million to$10 million.

ROJO SIX: Kurmas Buying All Assets for $20K-------------------------------------------Rojo Six, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the EasternDistrict of Michigan to authorize the private sale of substantiallyall assets to Raymond Kurmas for $20,000.

On Oct. 20, 2016, the Debtors filed a voluntary petition for reliefunder chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors' principalplaces of business assets are located in Rochester, Michigan; Novi,Michigan; Sterling Heights, Michigan; and Birmingham, Michigan. The Debtors now have possession of their assets and plan to managethe affairs of their estate as a debtor in possession in accordancewith 11 U.S.C. Sections 1107 and 1108. The Debtors have all of therights and powers of a trustee in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C.Section 1107(a).

Debtor Rojo One conducts business out of Novi, Michigan as DuelNovi and operates as a dueling piano bar. Debtor Rojo Two conductsbusiness out of Rochester, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro andoperates as a restaurant. Debtor Rojo Four conducts business outof Sterling Heights, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and operatesas a restaurant. Debtor Rojo Five conducts business out ofBirmingham, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and Sidecar Slider Barand operates as 2 restaurants. Debtor Rojo Six conducts businessout of Novi, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and Michigan BeerCompany and operates as 2 restaurants.

Since July 2016, Thomas Hospitality Group was engaged by the Rojoownership to market the 5 existing restaurants. Thomas Hospitalityspecializes in restaurants, bars and nightclubs, and its employeesare specifically experienced in this industry and have personalcontacts with many of the key players in the hospitality industry.

Thomas Hospitality's marketing efforts have focused on presentingeach of the restaurant sites on its Web site. Thomas Hospitalitythen fields calls from people who have visited its site; haveexecuted a confidentiality agreement; and have discussed theiroperational needs and locations of interest. Parallel to themarketing done through the Thomas Hospitality Web site,advertisements are placed on Loopnet and on BizBuySell, a Web sitethat focuses on businesses for sale that may not have a real estatecomponent, and advertisements are placed in the Detroit News.

Thomas Hospitality performed a valuation report of the Debtor. The value as determined by Thomas Hospitality is that the value iszero since all personal property is leased by the Debtor.

On Jan. 29, 2017, the Debtor and the Purchaser entered into Letterof Intent to Purchase. The purchase price for the property is$20,000 plus certain cure costs associated with the Debtor'sassumption and assignment. The purchase price is subject toincrease or decrease on account of certain prorations andadjustments customarily prorated between a purchaser and a sellerof similar assets. The Purchaser has made a good faith deposit inthe amount of $5,000 which will be credited to the purchase priceat closing.

Except for certain cost to be paid by the Purchaser pursuant to theAgreement certain other costs to be paid by the Purchaser, theAgreement requires that the Debtor deliver the Property toPurchaser free and clear of all liens, claims, interests andencumbrances. The consummation of the proposed sale to thePurchaser is conditioned, among other things set forth the entry ofa Sale Order approving the sale by the Court; assignment of theexisting lease to the Purchaser.

A copy of the Agreement and the valuation report attached to theMotion is available for free at:

The Debtor has concluded, in its business judgment, that the saleof the property to the Buyer will result in the highest and bestvalue for the property, and that the sale of the property is in thebest interests of the Debtor, the Debtor's estate, and itscreditors; therefore approval of the sale and the Agreement iswarranted.

The Debtor asks the authority to sell the property free and clearof all liens, claims, interests and other encumbrances. All liens,claims, interests and other encumbrances in and against theproperty will attach to the proceeds from the sale to the sameextent, priority and validity that existed on the Petition Date.

The Debtors' cases were procedurally consolidated and are jointlyadministered. The cases are assigned to Judge Maria L. Oxholm.

The Debtors each estimated assets at $0 to $50,000. All theDebtors, except for Rojo Five, estimated liabilities at $500,000to$1 million. Rojo Five estimated its liabilities at $1 million to$10 million.

ROJO TWO: Pelc Buying All Assets for $140K------------------------------------------Rojo Two, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the EasternDistrict of Michigan to authorize the private sale of substantiallyall assets to Scot Pelc for $140,000 plus lease arrears of $12,861and past due water bill of $7,974.

On Oct. 20, 2016, the Debtors filed a voluntary petition for reliefunder chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors' principalplaces of business assets are located in Rochester, Michigan; Novi,Michigan; Sterling Heights, Michigan; and Birmingham, Michigan. The Debtors now have possession of their assets and plan to managethe affairs of their estate as a debtor in possession in accordancewith 11 U.S.C. Sections 1107 and 1108. The Debtors have all of therights and powers of a trustee in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C.Section 1107(a).

Debtor Rojo One conducts business out of Novi, Michigan as DuelNovi and operates as a dueling piano bar. Debtor Rojo Two conductsbusiness out of Rochester, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro andoperates as a restaurant. Debtor Rojo Four conducts business outof Sterling Heights, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and operatesas a restaurant. Debtor Rojo Five conducts business out ofBirmingham, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and Sidecar Slider Barand operates as 2 restaurants. Debtor Rojo Six conducts businessout of Novi, Michigan as Rojo Mexican Bistro and Michigan BeerCompany and operates as 2 restaurants.

Since July 2016, Thomas Hospitality Group was engaged by the Rojoownership to market the 5 existing restaurants. Thomas Hospitalityspecializes in restaurants, bars and nightclubs, and its employeesare specifically experienced in this industry and have personalcontacts with many of the key players in the hospitality industry.

Thomas Hospitality's marketing efforts have focused on presentingeach of the restaurant sites on its Web site. Thomas Hospitalitythen fields calls from people who have visited its site; haveexecuted a confidentiality agreement; and have discussed theiroperational needs and locations of interest. Parallel to themarketing done through the Thomas Hospitality Web site,advertisements are placed on Loopnet and on BizBuySell, a Web sitethat focuses on businesses for sale that may not have a real estatecomponent, and advertisements are placed in the Detroit News.

Thomas Hospitality performed a valuation report of the Debtor. Thevalues as determined by Thomas Hospitality range from $77,000 to$115,000 dependant on the type of sale.

On Jan. 19, 2017, the Debtor and the Purchaser entered into Letterof Intent to Purchase. The purchase price for the property is$140,000 plus certain cure costs associated with the Debtor'sassumption and assignment. The purchase price is subject toincrease or decrease on account of certain prorations andadjustments customarily prorated between a purchaser and a sellerof similar assets. The Purchaser has made a good faith deposit inthe amount of $5,000 which will be credited to the purchase priceat closing.

Except for certain cost to be paid by the Purchaser pursuant to theAgreement certain other costs to be paid by the Purchaser, theAgreement requires that the Debtor deliver the Property toPurchaser free and clear of all liens, claims, interests andencumbrances. The consummation of the proposed sale to thePurchaser is conditioned, among other things set forth the entry ofa Sale Order approving the sale by the Court; assignment of theexisting lease to the Purchaser.

A copy of the Agreement and the valuation report attached to theMotion is available for free at:

The Debtor has concluded, in its business judgment, that the saleof the property to the Buyer will result in the highest and bestvalue for the property, and that the sale of the property is in thebest interests of the Debtor, the Debtor's estate, and itscreditors; therefore approval of the sale and the Agreement iswarranted.

The Debtor asks the authority to sell the property free and clearof all liens, claims, interests and other encumbrances. All liens,claims, interests and other encumbrances in and against theproperty will attach to the proceeds from the sale to the sameextent, priority and validity that existed on the Petition Date.

The Debtors' cases were procedurally consolidated and are jointlyadministered. The cases are assigned to Judge Maria L. Oxholm.

The Debtors each estimated assets at $0 to $50,000. All theDebtors, except for Rojo Five, estimated liabilities at $500,000to$1 million. Rojo Five estimated its liabilities at $1 million to$10 million.

ROSEWOOD OAKS: Unsecureds to be Fully Paid Within 30 Days---------------------------------------------------------Rosewood Oaks, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theWestern District of Texas a Chapter 11 combined plan ofreorganization and disclosure statement dated Jan. 30, 2017.

Class 3 Allowed General Unsecured Claims are unimpaired by thePlan. The Allowed Unsecured Claim will receive payment in full incash of the allowed amount of the claim within 30 days of theeffective date of the Plan.

The Plan will be funded by the $584,672.44 cash on hand in theDebtor-in-Possession account on the effective date of the Plan. The funds are to be used for the payment of claims or otherdistributions to be made under the Plan.

The Debtor estimates to have $584,672.44 of cash on hand on theeffective date of the Plan.

The Debtor owned a real property located at 2600 Rosewood Avenue,Austin, Texas. On Jan. 14, 2017, the Debtor executed a sale of thereal property to 2016 Wolverine Way, LP, as assignee andsuccessor-in-interest to Eureka Holdings for $1.65 million. Atclosing, the Debtor satisfied the mortgage and tax liens againstthe property and is holding $584,672.44 in its debtor-in-possessionaccount to disburse to the remaining claims in full.

Rosewood Oaks, LLC, secured in 1999 a land located at 2600 RosewoodAvenue, Austin, Texas, and built a day care center. Constructionwas complete in August 2001 and it commenced business. In August2005, Rosewood Oaks opened a second location.

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D.Tex. Case No. 16-11141) on Sept. 30, 2016. The petition was signedby Avis Wallace, manager. The case is assigned to Judge Tony M.Davis. At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assetsand liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

RUBEN VELASQUEZ: Feb. 21 Hearing to Determine PCO Appointment-------------------------------------------------------------Judge Robert T. Matsui of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the EasternDistrict of California entered an Order for Ruben S. Velasquez,M.D., Inc., to appear on February 21, 2017, and show cause why aPatient Care Ombudsman should not be appointed.

Judge Matsui noted in the order that the Debtor is a health carebusiness. Accordingly, Judge Matsui will order, not later than 30days after the commencement of the case, the appointment of apatient care ombudsman unless the Court finds that appointment isnot necessary for the protection of the patients under the specificfacts of the case.

SHOBRA LLC: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral--------------------------------------------------Shobra, LLC seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court forthe District of New Jersey to use cash collateral in the ordinarycourse of its business.

The Debtor contends that it needs to use cash collateral during thecourse of its case since it has limited alternative sources offunds. The Debtor tells the Court that an immediate and ongoinguse of cash collateral is required to fund its day-to-dayactivities. The Debtor further tells the Court that without theuse of cash collateral, it will not have sufficient availablesources of working capital and financing to carry on the operationof their business as a going concern.

The Debtor proposes to grant conditional adequate protection liensin all of its unencumbered property, to the extent necessary toprovide adequate protection on account of any diminution in thecash collateral.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated January 31, 2017, isavailable at https://is.gd/8C4V8L

SKYE ASSOCIATES: Plan Filing Deadline Extended Until April 17-------------------------------------------------------------Judge Thomas J. Catliota of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Maryland extended the exclusive period during whichSkye Associates, LLC may file a plan of reorganization throughApril 17, 2017, and held that the Debtor will have an additional 60days after filing its plan of reorganization in which it maysolicit votes on the plan of reorganization.

The Troubled Company Reporter had earlier reported that the Debtorrequested for exclusivity extension since the Debtor was still inthe process of determining how and in what manner it would befeasible to reorganize and what amount can be repaid to itscreditors. Because the amount of unsecured debts are likely to behigher, the Debtor asserted that it must determine if it would befeasible to pay these creditors from on-going operations.Currently, the Debtor had been attempting to determine if it canoperate profitably.

Since its bankruptcy filing, the Debtor related that it hadoperated profitably but it still needs to ascertain if the profitswill support repayment of its creditors. Furthermore, the Debtorwas also evaluating whether to relocate to a more cost effectivelocation.

The Debtor also told the Court that it was still trying to uncoverthe scope of the prior mismanagement of the company and put inplace proper procedures. As a result, the Debtor had yet toformulate a plan of reorganization.

About Skye Associates

Skye Associates, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of theBankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 16-22592) on Sept. 20,2016. The petition was signed by Michael Burton, managing member. The case is assigned to Judge Thomas J. Catliota. At the time ofthe filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 andliabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

The Debtor is represented by Richard B. Rosenblatt, Esq. and LindaM. Dorney, Esq. at the Law Offices of Richard B. Rosenblatt, PC.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Nov. 14, 2016, disclosed in acourt filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors hasbeen appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Skye Associates, LLC.

SOLID ROCK: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee----------------------------------------------------The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Feb. 2, 2017, disclosed in acourt filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors hasbeen appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Solid Rock Holdings, LLC.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $4.08 million inassets and $2.61 million in liabilities.

STARZ ACQUISITION: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for March 22-------------------------------------------------------------Judge Caryl E. Delano of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the MiddleDistrict of Florida issued an order conditionally approving thedisclosure statement and plan of reorganization filed by StarzAcquisition, LLC.

Any written objections to the disclosure statement shall be filedwith the Court and served no later than seven days prior to thedate of the hearing on confirmation.

The Court will conduct a hearing on confirmation of the Plan onMarch 22, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. in Ft. Myers, FL - Room 4-117,Courtroom E, United States Courthouse, 2110 First Street.

Parties in interest must submit their written ballot accepting orrejecting the Plan no later than 8 days before the date of theconfirmation hearing.

Objections to confirmation shall be filed and served no later than7 days before the date of the confirmation hearing.

About Starz Acquisition, LLC

Starz Acquisition, LLC, which operates Italianrestaurants/pizzerias, filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D.Fla. Case No. 16-08045), on Sept. 18, 2016. The petition wassigned by David Lee Virginia, managing member. The Debtor isrepresented by Michael R. Dal Lago, Esq., at Dal Lago Law. TheDebtor estimated assets at $100,001 to $500,000 and liabilities at$500,001 to $1 million at the time of the filing.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet beenappointed in the Chapter 11 case of Starz Acquisition, LLC, as ofOct. 21, 2016, according to a court docket.

SUNEDISON INC: Sale of 7 Minnesota Projects for $19M Approved-------------------------------------------------------------Judge Stuart M. Bernstein of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theSouthern District of New York authorized the sale by SunEdison,Inc. and its affiliates of SunE MN Development, LLC's 100%outstanding membership interests in the seven Project Companies("Equity Interests") listed in Schedule 1.1 to the PSA, dated as ofJan. 26, 2017, to Ecoplexus, Inc. for an aggregate consideration of$18,931,720, subject to adjustments.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims, liabilities, andencumbrances.

Pursuant to Sections 105(a) and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, andsubject to and conditioned upon the applicable Closing of theTransactions, Sun Edison, LLC's assumption and assignment to theProject Companies or the Buyer, at the Buyer's direction, of theSeller Permits is approved, and the requirements of Bankruptcy Codesections 365(b)(1) with respect thereto are deemed satisfied.

The zero Cure Amounts is the sole amount necessary to be paid bySun Edison, LLC upon assumption of the Seller Permits undersections 365(b)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, and the payment ofthe applicable Cure Amount will, subject to the terms of the PSA,(i) effect a cure of all defaults existing under the Seller Permitsas of and including the Closing Date (if any), and (ii) compensatethe counterparty to the Seller Permits for any actual pecuniaryloss resulting from all defaults existing under the Seller Permitsas of and including the Closing Date. To the extent thecounterparties to the Seller Permits failed to timely object to theproposed Cure Amount, such Cure Amount will be deemed to be finallydetermined and the counterparty will be prohibited fromchallenging, objecting to, or denying the validity and finality ofthe Cure Amount at any time, and such Cure Amount, when paid, willcompletely cure and remedy any breach or default with respect tothe Seller Permits.

The Buyer will not be required to seek or obtain relief from theautomatic stay under Section 362 to implement the PSA andconsummate the Transactions contemplated therein and enforce any ofits remedies under the PSA or any other sale-related document, orto effectuate the releases granted by the Releasing Parties,certain of which are Debtor entities. The automatic stay imposedby Bankruptcy Code section 362 is modified solely to the extentnecessary to implement the preceding sentence, provided howeverthat the Court will retain exclusive jurisdiction over any and alldisputes with respect thereto.

The requirements set forth in Bankruptcy Rules 6003(b) and 6004have been satisfied or otherwise deemed waived.

As provided by Bankruptcy Rules 7062 and 9014, the terms andconditions of the Order will be effective and enforceableimmediately upon entry and will not be subject to the stayprovisions contained in Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h). Time is of theessence in closing the sale, and the Seller and the Buyer intend toclose the sale as promptly as practicable following entry of theOrder.

SunEdison, Inc. (OTC PINK: SUNEQ), is a developer and seller ofphotovoltaic energy solutions, an owner and operator of cleanpower generation assets, and a global leader in the development,manufacture and sale of silicon wafers to the semiconductorindustry.

On April 21, 2016, SunEdison, Inc., and 25 of its affiliates eachfiled a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case Nos.16-10991 to 16-11017). Martin H. Truong, the senior vicepresident, general counsel and secretary, signed the petitions.

The Debtors disclosed total assets of $20.7 billion and totaldebt of $16.1 billion as of Sept. 30, 2015.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the Debtors'prepetition first lien credit agreement are Richard Levy, Esq.,and Brad Kotler, Esq., at Latham & Watkins.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the postpetition DIPfinancing facility are Scott Greissman, Esq., and Elizabeth Feld,Esq. at White & Case LLP.

Counsel to the Tranche B Lenders (as defined in the DIP creditagreement) and the steering committee of the second liencreditors are Arik Preis, Esq., and Naomi Moss, Esq., at AkinGump Strauss Hauer & Field, LLP.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the Debtors'prepetition second lien credit agreement is Daniel S. Brown,Esq., at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.

The collateral trustee under the Debtors' prepetition second liencredit agreement and the indenture trustee under each of theDebtors' outstanding bond issuances, is represented by Marie C.Pollio, Esq., at Shipman & Goodwin LLP.

Counsel to the ad hoc group of certain holders of the Debtors'convertible senior notes is White & Case LLP's Tom Lauria, Esq.

T&H PLASTICS: Unsecureds to Get $15,000 Per Year For 7 Yrs.-----------------------------------------------------------T&H Plastics, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theSouthern District of Texas a small business disclosure statementreferring to the Debtor's plan of reorganization dated Jan. 30,2017.

Class 5 General Unsecured Claims -- estimated at $604,000 -- isimpaired by the Plan. The Debtor will make seven annualinstallment payments to all creditors with allowed claims in thisclass. The first installment payment will be made 13 months afterthe Effective Date of the Plan. The amount of the annualinstallment payment will be $15,000. This payment will bedisbursed to creditors with allowed claims in this class on a prorata basis.

In the event of any failure of the Reorganized Debtor to timelymake its required plan payments to the creditor(s) in this class,which will constitute an event of default under the Plan as tothese creditors, they will send notice of the default as defined inSection VI to the Reorganized Debtor. If the default is not curedwithin 30 days of the date of the notice, these creditors mayproceed to collect all amounts owed pursuant to state law withoutfurther recourse to the Court. The creditor(s) are only requiredto send two notices of default, and upon the third event ofdefault, the creditor(s) may proceed to collect all amounts owedunder state law without recourse to the Bankruptcy Court andwithout further notice.

The Plan will be funded by the Reorganized Debtor through futureincome and continued operation of the business. The Debtorbelieves the Plan is feasible based on the projections attachedhereto as well as the increase in business and diversification ofofferings.

Additionally, the owners will personally contribute $12,597 to theDebtor as a new capital contribution to help fund the Plan.

T&H Plastics, Inc., is a for-profit corporation and wasincorporated with the Texas Secretary of State on Jan. 31, 2003. The Debtor's principals, Antonio Mendoza and Hector Gomez, havebeen in the business of plastic recycling since 1984 and 1982respectively. In 2003, they formed T&H Plastics, Inc., after theirprevious employer closed Houston Operations. T&H Plastics startedoperating in the same leased premises that the previous businesswas leasing prior to 2003. Since 2003, Messrs. Mendoza and Gomezhave cultivated relationships with auto parts manufacturers inMexico from whom they import a large portion of the plastic thatthey recycle. Some of these vendors supply raw materials to T&HPlastics for low or no cost due to the expense of disposal thatthey would face. T&H Plastics is diversifying their offerings ofplastic recycling services including processing materials for othercompanies, brokering, toll work which includes compounding andextruding, and regrinding services.

TANNER COMPANIES: Wants to Use Salem Investment Cash Collateral---------------------------------------------------------------Tanner Companies, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theWestern District of North Carolina for authorization to use cashcollateral.

The Debtor is indebted to Salem Investment Partners III, LP, in theapproximate sum of $9,950,000 as of the Petition Date. SalemInvestment asserts a security interest in substantially all of theDebtor's assets located in the United States.

The Debtor relates that in order to facilitate the transition fromthe Debtor's current financial and operational structure to thatcontemplated by the Plan and maximize Salem’s realization ofvalue from its collateral, pending Plan confirmation, the Debtorintends to continue its operations, including the design of appareland accessories for upcoming seasons and the sale, both through itsStylists and its retail outlets, pursuant to its proposed 13-weekbudget.

The Debtor proposes to grant Salem Investment with replacementliens in post-petition assets, to the same extent and priority asexisted prepetition.

The Debtor tells the Court that without the use of Salem's cashcollateral, the Debtor will not be able to continue its sales, thevalue of the Debtor's inventory will deteriorate rapidly, and theDebtor's ability to fashion an effective plan will be irreparablyimpaired.

Tanner Companies is headquartered in Rutherfordton, NC, with asecondary office in Jersey City, NJ. Tanner Companies has eightretail outlets located in the southeast region of the United Statesand approximately 115 employees, plus a multitude of non-employeesales stylists.

The Debtor's business consists of the design and direct sales ofhigh-end seasonal women's luxury apparel and accessories, under theDoncaster label, through independently-contracted sales stylists,which, in some instances, include agencies that incorporate morethan one individual sales stylist nationwide. Inventory which doesnot sell during a particular season is placed in one of theDebtor's retail outlets for approximately a year. After a year,inventory which does not sell in the retail outlets is placed inthe Debtor's warehouse and subsequently liquidated.

The Debtor's business, recognized as one of the first primarilyfemale-driven entrepreneurships, began in Charlotte, North Carolinaapproximately 85 years ago with Millie Tanner. Descendants ofMillie Tanner still hold equity interests in the Debtor. Some ofthe Stylists have worked for the Debtor for more than 20 years.

General unsecured trade creditors are classified in Class 2, andwill receive a distribution of 100% of their allowed claims, to bepaid within 28 days of the Effective Date of the Plan. In theunlikely event that a general unsecured trade creditor claim hasnot been allowed by the Effective Date, holders of the claims willbe paid within 14-days after the order allowing the claim becomesfinal.

The Plan will be funded from normal operating revenue generated bythe Debtor, capital contributions, advances and loans to theReorganized Debtor, and recovery of avoidable transfers. On theEffective Date, the Debtor will transfer an overriding royaltyinterest to the Chapter 11 trust. It also will fund, or arrangefor funding, the Chapter 11 trust with an additional $100,000. TheORRI is currently generating about $6,000 per month in revenues.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 26, 2016, theDebtor filed with the Court a disclosure statement referring to theDebtor's plan of reorganization. Under that plan, Class 4 --Unsecured Claims -- estimated at between $22,000,000 and$23,000,000 -- is impaired. On the Effective Date, the liquidatingtrust assets would vest in the Liquidating Trust free and clear ofall Claims, equity Interests, Liens, charges or, otherencumbrances.

The TCR, on Dec. 30, 2016, also reported that the Bankruptcy Courtapproved the disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 plan ofliquidation proposed by Gloria's Ranch, LLC, for the Debtor.

The plan filed on Dec. 12 proposes the formation of a trust forthebenefit of creditors holding unsecured claims against TaurenExploration. The purpose of the trust is to liquidate assets ofthe company, including the pursuit of claims against its insiders.

The liquidating trust will be self-funded from recoveries plus a$10,000 carve-out from the disposition of the collateral securingGloria's Ranch's secured claim. The net recoveries will bedistributed by the liquidating trustee to creditors.

The plan classifies claims against and interests in TaurenExploration into six classes. Class 4 unsecured claims andGloria's Ranch's Class 3 secured claim are both impaired under theplan. Holders of these claims are entitled to vote.

Meanwhile, all equity interests in Tauren Exploration will becanceled, according to court filings.

About Tauren Exploration

Tauren Exploration, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.Tex. Case No. 16-32188) on June 3, 2016, listing under $1 millionin both assets and liabilities. Its core business historically hasbeen in the oil and gas industry. The Debtor is represented byFrank L. Broyles, Esq., as counsel.

The Debtor hired Nathan M. Nichols, Esq., at Orenstein Law Group,P.C., as special litigation counsel.

The Debtor's proposed Budget, provides for total expenses in theamount of $14,179.50 for the week of January 30, 2017, $25,891.05for the week of February 6, 2017, $17,317.82 for the week ofFebruary 13, 2017, $14,691.69 for the week of February 20, 2017,and $12,616.74 for the week of February 27, 2017.

The Debtor proposes to grant the Secured Creditors replacementliens in all of the Debtor's pre-petition and post-petition assetsand proceeds, including the cash collateral and their proceeds, tothe extent that they had valid, legal and enforceable securityinterests in said pre-petition assets on the Filing Date and in thecontinuing order of priority that existed as of the Filing Date.

The Debtor further proposes to pay the IRS monthly adequateprotection payments in the amount of $331.

The Debtor is represented by Gary C. Fischoff, Esq., at Berger,Fischoff, & Shumer, LLP. The case is assigned to Judge Louis A.Scarcella.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $827,529 in assetsand $2.07 million in liabilities.

THAMES FUNDING: Court Allows Use of Dime Bank Cash Until Feb. 28----------------------------------------------------------------Judge James J. Tancredi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Connecticut authorized Thames Funding, Inc., to usecash collateral on an interim basis, from Feb. 1, 2017 through Feb.28, 2017.

The Debtor said that it is essential to its business and operationsto use cash generated from its rental payments from its propertiesso as to continue to pay ordinary course business expenses. Without the use of cash collateral, the Debtor warned it willsuffer harm and be forced to terminate operations and lose anychance for successful reorganization.

The Debtor is authorized to use up to $6,500 for the payment of allnecessary business expenses incurred in the ordinary course of itsbusiness, and the U.S. Trustee's statutory fees. The approvedBudget for February 2017 provided for total expenses in the amountof $5,792.

Dime Bank is granted replacement liens in all after-acquiredproperty of the Debtor, to the same extent and priority as existedas of the Petition Date.

The Debtor is directed to make monthly adequate protection paymentsin the amount of $500 to Dime Bank. The Debtor is further directedto provide Dime Bank with a monthly register report from all DIPaccounts showing all disbursements made for the prior 30 days onthe 15th of each month, beginning on Sept. 15, 2016.

A hearing on the continued use of cash collateral is scheduled onFeb. 16, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.

The Debtor is authorized to continue to operate and manage itsbusiness as a Debtor-In-Possession. No trustee or examiner hasbeen appointed in these proceedings.

TLD BAR: Rigdon Has Until Feb. 28 to Use Cash Collateral--------------------------------------------------------Judge Mark X. Mullin of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the NorthernDistrict of Texas authorized Debtor Bettye J. Rigdon to use cashcollateral, from Feb. 1, 2017 through the earlier to occur of Feb.28, 2017 or the date on which a final hearing on the CashCollateral Motion is conducted.

The approved Budget provided for total expenses in the amount of$6,890 for the month of February.

The Internal Revenue Service and First State Bank - Chico, weregranted replacement liens to compensate for any diminution in theIRS' or First State Bank - Chico's interest in the cashcollateral.

The Debtor is directed to make an adequate protection payment tothe IRS in the amount of $1,000 on or before Feb. 20, 2017.

TOTAL COMM: IRS to Get Monthly Payment With 4% Interest in 4 Yrs.-----------------------------------------------------------------Total Comm Systems, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court forthe Eastern District of Pennsylvania a third amended disclosurestatement describing its third amended plan of reorganization.

Class 2 Secured Internal Revenue Service Tax Claim is unimpaired bythe Plan. The IRS holds a claim of approximately $70,000 securedby property of the Debtor. This claim primes the claim of J DFactors and will be treated as follows:

a. regular equal monthly payments will be made for the Allowed Class 2 Claim;

b. monthly payments of the Allowed Class 2 Claim will commence the first day of the first calendar month after the Effective Date and continue monthly with interest accruing at the rate of 4% such that the Allowed Class 2 Claim is paid within 48 months of the Petition Date;

c. the Class 2 Creditor will maintain any lien, encumbrance, and security interest in the Property or assets of the Debtor until the conclusion of this Plan as they relate to

the Secured Claims; and

d. the Class 2 Creditor will retain its Class 2 Claim until paid in full pursuant to the Plan.

Class 8 Equity Holders Claims is impaired by the Plan. Class 8consists of all equity, ownership, or stock interests in the Debtorincluding all warrants, options, or rights to acquire shareswhether issued or not and whether contained in a single document orpart of a loan document or debt instrument. Holders of Class 8Claims will not receive a distribution under the Plan, and willmaintain their equity interests. Class 8 Claims will contributenew value in the amount of $50,000, the proceeds of which will beused to pay the priority secured claim of IRS.

Cash payments made pursuant to the Plan will be in U.S. funds, bycheck drawn on a domestic bank, or by wire transfer from a domesticbank. All distributions will be made by the disbursing agent.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Jan. 27, 2017, theDebtor filed with the Court a second amended disclosure statementdescribing its second amended plan of reorganization, whichproposed that Class 3, Other Secured Claims, be treated as follows:(a) following a final determination of the allowed amount of eachClass 3 Secured Claim, regular equal monthly payments will be madefor the Allowed Secured amount of the Class 3 Claims; (b) theDebtor will create a disputed claims reserve in the amount of thetotal Class 3 Claims (which are approximately $325,959.62) from itsnormal business operations; (c) monthly payments of the AllowedSecured Class 3 Claims will commence the first day of the firstcalendar month after the Effective Date and continuing for 72months with interest accruing at the rate of 3.5%; (d) Class 3Creditors will maintain any lien, encumbrance, and securityinterest in the Property or assets of the Debtor until theconclusion of this Plan as they relate to the Secured Claims; and(e) to the extent that any amount of a Class 3 Claim is unsecured,it will be paid as a General Unsecured Claim.

About Total Comm Systems

Total Comm Systems, Inc., is a provider of engineering,construction, excavation, installation, and maintenance servicesfor the telecommunications industry.

The Debtor is a debtor-in-possession and no trustee has beenappointed in the Chapter 11 case.

TUBRO CONSTRUCTION: Wants to Use Wells Fargo Cash Collateral------------------------------------------------------------Tubro Construction Inc. seeks authorization from the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington to use cashcollateral of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., on an interim basis.

The Debtor relates that it intends to use cash collateral to paypre-petition debt, specifically employee payroll including officercompensation, and the associated payroll taxes.

The Debtor has operated since 2010 a construction and handymanbusiness. As part of the reorganization, the Debtor needs tocontinue operating its business and paying expenses, includingpre-petition payroll. The Debtor asserts that continuation of itsoperations is essential to preserving the value of the business forthe estate.

The Debtor also seeks authorization to pay all federal and statewithholding and payroll-related taxes, including, but not limitedto, all withholding taxes, Social Security taxes, and Medicaretaxes, as well as all other withholdings such as life insurance andother employee deductions.

The Debtor's February 2017 Budget projects operating expenses at anaggregate sum of $156,286. From the amount, the Debtor expects todisburse an average of $65,000 for monthly payroll. The Debtordisburses payroll on a bi-weekly basis, and the next payroll isscheduled to occur on February 3, 2017 by automatic deposit. TheDebtor explains that because payroll always covers the periodending two weeks prior, it will comprise entirely of hours workedpre-petition, specifically up through January 20, 2017, since itscase was filed January 30, 2017.

Wells Fargo holds a senior security interest in the funds in theDebtor's bank account -- totaling approximately $50,000 at present,and accounts receivable -- totaling approximately $96,000 atpresent. Wells Fargo is owed approximately $307,000 on the line ofcredit. There is also a credit card with Wells Fargo forapproximately $43,000.

The Debtor proposes to make monthly payments of $1,555 to WellsFargo, and grant replacement liens on new receivables, to ensurethat it is adequately protected.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated January 31, 2017, isavailable at https://is.gd/O2qh5d

A full-text copy of the Debtor's proposed Budget, dated January 31,2017, is available at https://is.gd/ascD4f

About Tubro Construction Inc.

Tubro Construction Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.Wash. Case No. 17-10390), on January 30, 2017. The petition wassigned by Richard Tietjen, president. The case is assigned toJudge Marc Barreca. The Debtor is represented by Jeffrey B Wells,Esq., at Wells and Jarvis, P.S. At the time of filing, the Debtorestimated assets at $100,000 to $500,000 and liabilities at $1million to $10 million.

ULTRA PETROLEUM: Invesco No Longer Holds Equity Stake-----------------------------------------------------Invesco Ltd. said in a regulatory filing with the Securities andExchange Commission that it no longer holds shares of UltraPetroleum Corp. common stock.

On April 29, 2016, Ultra Petroleum Corp. and seven subsidiarycompanies filed petitions (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) seeking relief underchapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors'cases have been assigned to Judge Marvin Isgur. These cases arebeing jointly administered for procedural purposes, with allpleadings filed in these cases will be maintained on the casedocket for Ultra Petroleum Corp. Case No. 16-32202.

Ultra Petroleum disclosed total assets of $1.28 billion and totalliabilities of $3.91 billion as of March 31, 2016.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee has appointed seven creditors ofUltra Petroleum Corp. to serve on an Official Committee ofUnsecured Creditors. The Committee tapped Weil, Gotshal & MangesLLP as its legal counsel; Opportune LLP as advisor; and PJTPartners LP as its financial advisor.

ULTRA PETROLEUM: Needs Until June 29 to File Reorganization Plan----------------------------------------------------------------Ultra Petroleum Corp. and its affiliated Debtors ask the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to extend thetime during which the Debtors have the exclusive right to file achapter 11 plan, through and including June 29, 2017, and thedeadline to solicit a plan, through and including August 29, 2017.

The Debtors contend that there are still many unresolved issuesthat must be addressed to bring these chapter 11 cases toconclusion. Among other things, additional time is needed for theDebtors to:

(a) prosecute the Plan, including working to close the$580-million rights offering contemplated in the BackstopCommitment Agreement without the disruption that would result fromalternative plans that could be motivated by the parochialinterests of the Debtors' sophisticated and aggressivestakeholders;

(b) continue to engage in discussions with the Committee, theOpCo Group, and the OpCo Noteholder Group regarding the Plan andDisclosure Statement -- a significant undertaking given thecomplexity of the Debtors' capital structure, number of organizedstakeholder groups, and divergent views held by certainconstituencies;

(c) litigate the OpCo Group's motions to appoint a chapter 11trustee and to contest certain Plan classification matters; and

(d) continue their comprehensive claim reconciliation,objection, and settlement process, which has included theresolution of hundreds of millions of dollars of claims asserted byPinedale Corridor L.P., Rockies Express Pipeline, LLC, and Big WestOil LLC.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee has appointed seven creditors ofUltra Petroleum Corp. to serve on an Official Committee ofUnsecured Creditors. The Committee tapped Weil, Gotshal & MangesLLP as its legal counsel; Opportune LLP as advisor; and PJTPartners LP as its financial advisor.

Following the rating actions, Moody's will withdraw all ratings andthe rating outlook of Vanguard consistent with Moody's practice forcompanies operating under the purview of the bankruptcy courtswherein information flow typically becomes very limited (refer toMoody's ratings withdrawal policy available on its website,www.moodys.com).

The downgrade of the PDR to D-PD reflects Vanguard's voluntarypetitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code inthe United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District ofTexas, Houston Division. The C rating on the notes incorporatesMoody's final recovery assumptions. Vanguard plans on eliminating$708 million of debt following the reorganization. Vanguard enteredinto a restructuring support agreement (RSA) with certainconsenting holders of its notes on February 1, 2017. Under the RSA,Vanguard's senior unsecured note holders will receive 97% of thecommon equity in the reorganized entity and the opportunity toparticipate in a rights offering.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was GlobalIndependent Exploration and Production Industry published inDecember 2011.

March 1, 2017 is fixed as the last day for filing writtenacceptances or rejections of the plan which must be received by4:00 p.m. (CST).

March 1, 2017 is fixed as the last day for filing and servingwritten objections to final approval of the disclosure statement orconfirmation of the plan.

The hearing to consider final approval of the disclosure statementand to consider the confirmation of the plan is fixed and will beconducted by video conferencing means on March 7, 2017, at 1:30p.m. in the First Floor Bankruptcy Courtroom, Jack Brooks FederalBuilding, 300 Willow Street, in Beaumont, Texas.

Violin Memory, Inc., develops and supplies memory-based storagesystems for high-speed applications, servers and networks in theAmericas, Europe and the Asia Pacific. Founded in 2005, theCompany is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

The U.S. Trustee, on Dec. 27, 2016, named three creditors to serveon the official committee of unsecured creditors WilmingtonTrust, N.A., Clinton Group, Inc., and Forty Niners SC StadiumCompany LC.

The Committee hires Cooley LLP as lead counsel, and ElliotGreenleaf as its Delaware counsel.

* * *

According to Matt Chiappardi at Bankruptcy Law360, Violin Memorytold the Bankruptcy Court on Jan. 30 that a unit of major creditorSoros Fund Management LLC put in the winning bid for its assetswith an offer valued at least $14.5 million, but it needs more timeto negotiate terms of a Chapter 11 plan sponsorship agreement. Violin Memory filed with the Bankruptcy Court a notice identifyingVM Bidco LLC as the winner of its three-day auction in New York.

VSI LIQUIDATING: Greenbrier Buying Cleveland Property for $50K--------------------------------------------------------------VSI Liquidating Inc., et al., ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Delaware to authorize their private sale of owned realproperty located at 3201 Independence Road, in the County ofCuyahoga, City of Cleveland, Ohio, PPN: 131-12- 001, to GreenbrierDevelopment, LLC for $50,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Feb. 24, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.(ET). Objection deadline is Feb. 14, 2017 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

On Sept. 8, 2016, the Court entered an Order (A) Approving andAuthorizing Sale of Substantially All of Debtors' Assets Pursuantto Purchaser's Asset Purchase Agreement, Free and Clear of Liens,Claims, Encumbrances and Other Interests, (B) Approving theAssumption and Assignment of Certain Executory Contracts andUnexpired Leases Related Thereto, and (C) Granting Related Relief("Valencia Sale Order"). Pursuant to the Valencia Sale Order, theBankruptcy Court authorized and approved, among other things, theValencia Sale of substantially all of the Debtors' assets toValencia Bidco, LLC and its designees. On Oct. 31, 2016, theDebtors and the Purchaser closed on the Valencia Sale.

On Nov. 4, 2016, the Debtors filed that ce1iain Notice of Filing ofFinal Asset Purchase Agreement and Related Documents in Connectionwith Closing of Sale of Substantially All of the Debtors' Assets[Docket No. 519], which attached a copy of the Final Asset PurchaseAgreement by and among the Debtors and the Purchaser ("FinalAPA").

Pursuant to Schedule 1.2(1) of the Final APA, the ClevelandProperty at issue in the Motion constitutes "Excluded RealProperty" and was not purchased by the Purchaser in connection withthe Valencia Sale.

On Dec. 15, 2016, the Debtors filed the Debtors' First Amended Planof Liquidation Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and theDisclosure Statement for the Debtors' First Amended Plan ofLiquidation Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

On Dec. 19, 2016, the Court entered the Order (I) Approving theDisclosure Statement, (II) Establishing Solicitation and VotingProcedures, (III) Scheduling a Confirmation Hearing, and (IV)Establishing Notice and Objection Procedures for Confirmation ofthe Plan. The First Amended Plan, among other things, contemplatesthe creation of an Environmental Response Trust, which is intendedto effectuate the transfer of certain of the Debtors' realproperties, including, with written consent of the EnvironmentalResponse Trust Beneficiaries and the Environmental ResponseTrustee, the Cleveland Property. Article IV.J of the Planspecifically allows the Debtors the option to seek a sale of realproperty contemplated to be transferred to the EnvironmentalResponse Trust by filing a motion with the Bankruptcy Court seekingapproval of such sale.

The hearing on confirmation of the First Amended Plan is currentlyscheduled for Feb. 24, 2017, which is also the date on which thepresent Motion is set to be heard.

On Sept. 18, 2013, the Debtor Vertellus Specialties, Inc. andIndependence Excavating, Inc. ("Tenant") entered into Ground LeaseAgreement for the lease of the Cleveland Property owned by VSI. The leased premises are subject to environmental investigation andremediation as directed by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency("OEPA") pursuant to a Dec. 16, 2010 OEPA Declaration and DecisionDocument and an OEPA Director's Final Findings & Orders("Corrective Action").

Pursuant to Section 14.1 of the Lease Agreement, the Tenant wasgranted an option to purchase the Cleveland Property ("PurchaseOption") for a purchase price of $50,000, subject to certain termsand conditions set forth in the Lease Agreement. Specifically, thePurchase Option is conditioned upon completion of the Tenant'sremedial work under the Corrective Action, which includesinstallation of an isolation barrier and approval of an operationand maintenance plan for the barrier, subject to OEPA oversight andapproval. To date, the Tenant has incurred direct costs exceeding$775,000 in completing the installation of the isolation barrier.

In accordance with Section 14.1 of the Lease Agreement, the Tenanthas: (i) delivered an Option Exercise Notice to VSI; (ii) exercisedthe Purchase Option to purchase the Cleveland Property for thePurchase Price; and (iii) assigned its right to purchase theCleveland Property to the Purchaser. VSI and the Purchaser, as theTenant's assignee, have entered into that certain PurchaseAgreement for the Sale of the Cleveland Property in accordance withSection 14.1 of the Lease Agreement.

The material terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement are:

a. Address of the Cleveland Property: 3201 IndependenceRoad County of Cuyahoga, City of Cleveland, Ohio, PPN: 131-12-001.

b. Purchase Price: $50,000

c. Earnest Money Deposit: $50,000

d. Closing: Within 14 days of entry of an order approvingthe Sale, provided that the Purchaser will have the right to extendthe Closing Date for up to 30 days if the Purchaser requires suchadditional time to secure a new approved parcel map and/or legaldescription.

f. Sale Free and Clear: The Cleveland Property will betransferred to the Purchaser free and clear of all liens, claims,encumbrances, and interests of any kind or nature to the fullestextent permitted by section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.

A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion isavailable for free at:

The Debtors have determined in their business judgment that theprivate Sale of the Cleveland Property will enable them to obtainthe highest and best offer for the Cleveland Property, therebymaximizing value, and is in the best interests of the Debtors'creditors. In addition, the sale will further reduce theadministrative burden on the proposed Environmental Response Trustand streamline the path to confirmation of the First Amended Plan. Accordingly, the Debtors ask the Court to grant the reliefrequested and such other and further relief as the Court may deemjust and proper.

The Purchaser can be reached at:

GREENBRIER DEVELOPMENT, LLC 5720 Schaaf Rd. Independence, OH 44131

About Vertellus Specialties

Vertellus Specialties Inc. was a global specialty chemicalscompanyfocused on the manufacture of ingredients used in pharmaceuticals,personal care, nutrition, agriculture, and a host of other marketareas affected by trends favoring "green" technologies andchemistries.

The Troubled Company Reporter reported that Vertellus SpecialtiesInc. completed the sale of substantially all of its U.S. andinternational assets to its prior term loan lenders, a groupincluding Black Diamond Capital Management and Brightwood CapitalAdvisors, among others, on Oct. 31, 2016.

WADHWA DENTAL: Seeks Court Approval for Cash Collateral Use-----------------------------------------------------------Wadhwa Dental, PA seeks authorization from the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the Western District of Texas to use cash collateral.

The Debtor is operated as a dental practice by Harmandeep S.Wadhwa, DDS, its sole owner, who is a Doctor of Dental Surgery.

The Debtor owns no real property, instead, its primary assetsconsist of dental equipment such as dental chairs and x-raymachines worth approximately $67,500 and inventory/supplies worth$3,800. Dr. Wadhwa estimated that there were $233,750.06 incollectible accounts receivable at the time the bankruptcy wasfiled.

The Debtor believes that it will be able to meet its obligationspost-petition if it has the funds available from or generated byits pre-petition cash collateral to pay its post-petition expenses,as reflected in the proposed Budget. The proposed 90-day Budgetprovides total operating expenses in the amount of $109,209 fromDecember 2016 through February 2017.

The Debtor contends that it needs immediate authority to use thecash collateral in order to meet its ongoing post-petitionobligations and continue its normal business operations, andpreserve the value of the estate pending confirmation of a plan ofreorganization.

The Debtor believes that it owes Bank of America, N.A.approximately $594,658, and that Bank of America may assert a lienin the Debtor's accounts, equipment, instruments, investmentproperty, deposit accounts, general intangibles, fixtures,furnishings and improvements, a PMSI in equipment, goods andinventory purchased from proceeds of the loan.

The Debtor also believes that U.S. Bank Equipment Finance is owedthe amount of $167,580, which is secured by various items ofequipment financed by U.S. Bank, which includes files,replacements, parts, repairs, additions, accessions and accessoriesand any proceeds or insurance recoveries thereof.

The Debtor proposes to provide following adequate protection to allparties with an interest in the cash collateral:

(a) Replacement lien to the same extent, priority andvalidity as its pre-petition lien;

(b) The Debtor will continue to operate its business in theordinary course of business thus generating additional CashCollateral;

(c) The Debtor will maintain insurance upon the propertygiving rise to the Cash Collateral; and

(d) The Debtor will provide monthly cash payments, to Bankof America, equal to the regular monthly debt service on theDebtor's note, beginning in the month of January, 2017, with oneadditional post-petition payment also paid in the month of January.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion, dated January 31, 2017, isavailable at https://is.gd/gau7Zn

A full-text copy of the Debtor's proposed Budget, dated January 31,2017, is available at https://is.gd/nf3xGz

About Wadhwa Dental, PA

Wadhwa Dental, PA is a corporation based in San Antonio, Texas. Itis operated as a dental practice by Harmandeep S. Wadhwa, DDS, itssole owner. Dr. Wadhwa is a Doctor of Dental Surgery licensed bythe Texas State Board of Dental Examiners since July, 2009.

Wadhwa Dental, PA filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex.Case No. 16-52134), on September 22, 2016. The petition was signedby Harmandeep S. Wadhwa, President. The Debtor is represented byH. Anthony Hervol, Esq., at the Law Office of H. Anthony Hervol. At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated assets at $100,000 to$500,000 and liabilities at $500,000 to $1 million.

No trustee or examiner has been appointed in the Debtor's Chapter11 Case, nor has a creditors’ committee or other officialcommittee been appointed.

WALDEN REAL ESTATE: Plan Confirmation Hearing to be Held March 15-----------------------------------------------------------------The Hon. Keith L. Phillips of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theEastern District of Virginia has scheduled for March 15, 2017, at10:30 a.m. the hearing to consider the confirmation of the Chapter11 plan filed by Walden Real Estate Ventures, LLC, on Dec. 22,2016.

Objections to the confirmation of the Plan must be filed by March8, 2017, which is also the last day for filing written acceptancesor rejections to the Plan.

No later than 35 days prior to the Confirmation Hearing, theproponent of the Plan will mail to creditors, equity securityholders, and other parties-in-interest, and transmit to the U.S.Trustee, the Plan, a ballot conforming to Official Form 14, and anotice of the Confirmation Hearing.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million inassets and $500,000 to $1 million in liabilities. The petition wassigned by Lee A Barnes, Jr., managing member.

WET SEAL: Feb. 13 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel------------------------------------------------------Andy Vara, United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold anorganizational meeting on Feb. 13, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in thebankruptcy case of The Wet Seal, LLC.

The meeting will be held at:

The Doubletree Hotel 700 King Street Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee orcommittees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuantto Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code. A representative of theDebtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and providebackground information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trusteeappoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable. The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor ofthe kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee mayconsult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its businessoperations and participate in the formulation of a plan ofreorganization. The Committee may also perform other services asare in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom itrepresents.

The Chapter 11 cases are pending in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court forthe District of Delaware and assigned to the Hon. Judge ChristopherS. Sontchi. Contemporaneously with the filing of their voluntarypetitions, the Debtors are filing a motion requesting that theCourt consolidate their Chapter 11 cases under the Lead Case No.17-10229.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors owe: (a) Crystal Financial,LLC $9.7 million on account of a credit agreement dated April 15,2015, (b) Mador Funding, LLC approximately $15.6 million and (c)unsecured creditors $8 million.

WILLBROS GROUP: Moody's Withdraws Caa1 Corporate Family Rating--------------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service has withdrawn all ratings for WillbrosGroup, Inc., including its Caa1 corporate family rating, Caa1-PDprobability of default rating and the B3 rating on the seniorsecured asset based revolving credit facility issued by WillbrosUnited States Holdings Inc.

Moody's has withdrawn the ratings for its own business reasons.Please refer to the Moody's Investors Service's Policy forWithdrawal of Credit Ratings, available on its website,www.moodys.com.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving directcredit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit ratingaction, and whose ratings may change as a result of this creditrating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be thoseof the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for thefollowing disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: AncillaryServices, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

WOODHAVEN TOWNHOUSE: Unsecureds to be Fully Paid in 4 Years-----------------------------------------------------------Woodhaven Townhouse Association, Inc., filed with the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas a disclosurestatement dated Jan. 27, 2017, referring to the Debtor's plan ofreorganization.

Class 5 Allowed General Unsecured Claims will be paid once allowedin full over 48 months. The payments will be made in monthlypayments on the first day of the month following the Effective Dateand will continue on the first day of each month thereafter untilpaid as called for by the Plan. The estimated amount in this classis $83,000. Of this amount $69,000 is disputed. Christina Dudek'sclaim is treated in this class. The Class 5 Claims are impairedand the holders of a Class 5 Claim are entitled to vote to acceptor reject the Plan.

"The downgrade considers that Wynn did not achieve 6.0 times netdebt/EBITDA target that Moody's previously stated would benecessary by the time the $4.1 billion Wynn Palace opened for theWynn to avoid a downgrade," stated Keith Foley, a Senior VicePresident at Moody's. The Wynn Palace opened on the Cotai Strip inMacau, China in August 2016. "Although Moody's expects Wynn will beimprove its leverage now that the Wynn Palace has opened and willbegin to contribute EBITDA to offset the debt used to fund itsconstruction, it's not expected the company will be able to returnto a leverage profile consistent with its former Ba2 CorporateFamily Rating," added Foley.

Wynn's consolidated net debt/EBITDA for fiscal 2016 was about 7.6times. Based on Moody's current assumptions, Wynn's net debt/EBITDAwill not drop below 6.0 until sometime in 2018 because of what isexpected to be a slower than expected ramp up of Wynn Palace andthe largely debt funded development of Wynn's $2.2-$2.4 billioncasino development near Boston, MA which isn't expected to openuntil sometime in 2019. The net debt amount used in thiscalculation incorporates excess cash available, which includesunrestricted cash and short-term investments, but excludes assumedamounts needed for day-to-day operations along with an estimate ofoffshore cash amounts.

Wynn's ratings are supported by the quality, popularity, andfavorable reputation of company's casino properties -- a factorthat continues to distinguish it from most other gaming operators.The ratings also consider the favorable prospects for the company'scasino in Everett, MA, a suburb near Boston that will improve thecompany's geographic diversification. Moody's believes this casinowill ramp up well initially as well as perform strongly over thelong term given the favorable demographics, visitation trends, andpopulation concentration of the Boston area.

In addition to the company's high leverage, key credit concernsinclude Wynn's limited diversification despite the fact that it isone of the largest U.S. gaming operators in terms of revenue.Wynn's revenue and cash flow are concentrated in the Macau gamingmarket which has experienced significant declines in gaming revenueduring the past few years and has only recently stabilized. Moody'salso expects that Wynn will be presented with and pursue otherlarge, high profile, integrated resort development opportunitiesaround the world. As a result there will likely be periods wherethe company's leverage experiences periods of increases due topartially debt-financed, future development projects.

The stable rating outlook incorporates Moody's expectation thatWynn will begin to reduce its leverage, albeit slower thanexpected. It also considers the financial flexibility afforded tothe company by its very good liquidity profile and lack of anynear-term debt maturities. An upgrade would require that Wynndemonstrate the ability and willingness to achieve and maintain netdebt/EBITDA below 5.0 times. Wynn ratings could be lowered if, forany reason, it appears the company will not be able to reduce andmaintain its net debt/EBITDA below 6.0 times by the end of fiscal2018.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Global GamingIndustry" published in June 2014.

[*] No. of Companies with Moody's B3 & Below Rating Down in Jan.----------------------------------------------------------------The number of companies on its B3 Negative and Lower CorporateRatings List fell again in January, dipping 2.7% month over month.Moody's Investors Service says in a new report. Down 4.5% from justa year ago, the number of companies on the list now stands at 252,reflecting a 13% decrease from the list's all-time high of 291companies.

"At 17% of the total spec-grade population, the list's cohort isclose to its long-term average of 15%," noted Moody's associateanalyst Julia Chursin. "Were Moody's to excludes the oil & gassector in the analysis, however, the percentage of B3 negative andlower companies would be even closer to the 15% long-termaverage."

Ratings upgrades picked up significantly in contrast to the priormonth, causing five companies to leave the list -- a sign ofimproving fundamentals at spec-grade companies. Nevertheless,Chursin cautioned that defaults have not subsided to a greatextent, and taken together with benign rating actions, account forthe list's reduction. In fact, defaults marginally dominatedupgrades by 6 to 1 ratio. Notably, the majority of these defaultsemanated from the E&P and OFS sectors.

Oil and gas continued to be the sector with the largestrepresentation on Moody's list, accounting for a full quarter ofthe total number of companies. Consumer/business services andmanufacturing followed, at 12% and 9%, respectively.

[*] Number of Bankruptcy Filings by U.S. Retailers Spikes in 2016-----------------------------------------------------------------Although energy companies grabbed the biggest bankruptcy headlinesin 2016, the number of bankruptcy filings by U.S. retailers nearlydoubled, and 2017 looks bleak for the industry, according to TheDeal, a business unit of TheStreet, Inc.

"The rate of Chapter 11 filings is often an indicator of anindustry's health and that's bad news for retailers," said IanWenik, bankruptcy reporter at The Deal. "The number oflarge-liability retail Chapter 11 filings (at least $250 million inliabilities) nearly doubled in 2016 and that trend shows no signsof slowing down. Teen clothing retailers in particular arestruggling as teenagers turn towards experiences as a method ofconspicuous consumption and away from fashion labels."

The Deal's exclusive ranking covers the top U.S and Canadian firmsinvolved in bankruptcy cases filed between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31,2016.

-- For investment banks by volume, Houlihan Lokey Inc. remainedin the top spot, with $118.2 billion in liabilities. Lazard Ltd.followed in second, with $83 billion in liabilities. Moelis & Co.LLC was third, with $54.7 billion in liabilities. PJT PartnersInc. ranked fourth, with $34.8 billion in liabilities. JefferiesLLC rounded up the top five with $29.8 billion in liabilities.

-- FTI Consulting Inc. claimed the top spot for Canadianbankruptcy monitors by volume with $10.9 billion.PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. followed with $8.3 billion. Ernst &Young Inc. came in third with $5.3 billion. Alvarez & Marsal LLCcame in fourth with $974 million. Richter Consulting Inc. came infifth with $672.4 million.

The Deal's U.S. Bankruptcy League Tables include cases with atleast $25 million in liabilities. The Canadian Bankruptcy LeagueTables include all cases filed under the Companies CreditorsArrangement Act (CCAA), plus cases filed pursuant to the Bankruptcyand Insolvency Act (BIA), with at least $25 million in liabilities. The rankings are based on the aggregation of those liabilityvalues.

About The Deal

The Deal -- http://www.thedeal.com-- provides actionable, intraday coverage of mergers, acquisitions and all other changes incorporate control to institutional investors, private equity, hedgefunds and the firms that serve them. The Deal is a business unitof TheStreet, Inc., a financial news and information provider. Other business units include TheStreet, which is celebrating its 20[th] year of producing unbiased business news and market analysis;BoardEx), a relationship mapping service of corporate directors andofficers; and RateWatch, which supplies rate and fee data frombanks and credit unions across the U.S.

Judge Gorsuch has more than 10 years on a federal appeals court,Jacqueline Bell, writing for Law360, relates. Law360 states thatJudge Gorsuch has degrees from Harvard Law School, a Marshallscholarship to Oxford University and two Supreme Court clerkships.

Citing legal experts, Daniel Wilson at Law360 states that with asolid conservative bent, Judge Gorsuch is unlikely to shift thehigh court's jurisprudence significantly away from where it stoodwith the late Judge Scalia.

"Judge Gorsuch is a stellar choice. He's brilliant and -- perhapsas important -- he hails from the West and brings much neededgeographic diversity to the court," Law360 quoted Lisa Blatt, Esq.,at Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP as saying.

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative pricesfor bond issues that reportedly trade well below par. Prices areobtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources duringthe prior week we think are reliable. Those sources may not,however, be complete or accurate. The Monday Bond Pricing tableis compiled on the Friday prior to publication. Prices reportedare not intended to reflect actual trades. Prices for actualtrades are probably different. Our objective is to shareinformation, not make markets in publicly traded securities.Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy orsell any security of any kind. It is likely that some entityaffiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuerspublic debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies withinsolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 pershare in public markets. At first glance, this list may look likethe definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.Don't be fooled. Assets, for example, reported at historical costnet of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm'sassets. A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet forliabilities that may never materialize. The prices at whichequity securities trade in public market are determined by morethan a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filedChapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets andliabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts. The listincludes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollarpetitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book ofinterest to troubled company professionals. All titles areavailable at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com. Go tohttp://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday editionof the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the weekthen-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale orpublication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronicre-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without priorwritten permission of the publishers. Information containedherein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but isnot guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered viae-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the samefirm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereofare $25 each. For subscription information, contact Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.