The first paragraph of the aptosid Wikipedia refers to aptosid in the past tense. There are a few other places in the article where it's referred to in the past tense as well. I was going to edit this but thought it might be prudent to check here first. To the best of my knowledge, aptosid is still not dead. Can anyone see any reason not to change the past tenseness in the article?

slh

Post subject: RE: aptosid Wikipedia article Posted: 09.09.2014, 20:36

Joined: 2010-08-25
Posts: 962

Status: Offline

Isn't it quite futile to argue about wikipedia semantics?

As far as aptosid is concerned, it's alive and kicking (as http://aptosid.com/debian/dists/unstable/InRelease might, or might not - depending on the particular point of view of the spectator, confirm, respectively refute), regardless of what wikipedia thinks about it.

mithat

Post subject: RE: aptosid Wikipedia article Posted: 11.09.2014, 22:40

Joined: 2011-12-15
Posts: 31

Status: Offline

Indeed. For every opinion on the Internet, there is an equal and opposite opinion.