Without a government, social contracts would spring up unto someone with more than another would have more to trade, but less to seek. They'll gain power over others and you will soon gain a government.

And money is another form of service for a service. How would you get food without trading for something? How would you trade for anything, without something?You won't be able to, and the poor would die off. The middle class would slowly become poor, and die off. The rich would have everything, until they started drifting into wars to captures what others have.

If you are proposing anarchy, that is what you will get. If you are proposing a true form of communism, you will never get it. Humans are not ants, and never will be. And even ants are controlled by a leader.

Without a government, social contracts would spring up unto someone with more than another would have more to trade, but less to seek. They'll gain power over others and you will soon gain a government.

And money is another form of service for a service. How would you get food without trading for something? How would you trade for anything, without something?You won't be able to, and the poor would die off. The middle class would slowly become poor, and die off. The rich would have everything, until they started drifting into wars to captures what others have.

If you are proposing anarchy, that is what you will get. If you are proposing a true form of communism, you will never get it. Humans are not ants, and never will be. And even ants are controlled by a leader.

Quoting: Zerocyber

You create a resource-based economy along with an automated labor force and govern by reason and the scientific method. Don't elect people, elect ideas!

The other - very major - problem everyone misses is that the seigniorage is assigned to governments or to bankers, and that misappropriation is an error of axiomatic magnitude that amplifies itself down through time resulting in the problems we face today.

To balance the books, the money tokens - no matter what format they take - must have their face value assigned to the people who give value to the tokens. This assignment must take place at inception.

Any particular money token is a socially accepted mnemonic device. Narayana Kocherlakota points this out in his writing.

Without a government, social contracts would spring up unto someone with more than another would have more to trade, but less to seek. They'll gain power over others and you will soon gain a government.

And money is another form of service for a service. How would you get food without trading for something? How would you trade for anything, without something?You won't be able to, and the poor would die off. The middle class would slowly become poor, and die off. The rich would have everything, until they started drifting into wars to captures what others have.

If you are proposing anarchy, that is what you will get. If you are proposing a true form of communism, you will never get it. Humans are not ants, and never will be. And even ants are controlled by a leader.

Quoting: Zerocyber

Anarchy is merely libertarian socialism; that is, pure communism.

It has nothing to do with ants; that's colonialism, which is a form of Imperialism, which is pure Capitalism.

You seem to have it all backwards; think about what is being proposed before posting again.