Promoted Stories

Comments (5)

What is the planning department thinking when it approves nine double-bed apartments and says that only ten people can live there? It is just nonsense.

What is the planning department thinking when it approves nine double-bed apartments and says that only ten people can live there? It is just nonsense.danieled

What is the planning department thinking when it approves nine double-bed apartments and says that only ten people can live there? It is just nonsense.

Score: 3

Hwicce says...11:40am Wed 26 Mar 14

"It was approved despite concerns up to 18 people could be living at the property, which is in a residential street in St John's." Shock, horror! - people living in a residential street. What next? - cows living in the countryside?

"It was approved despite concerns up to 18 people could be living at the property, which is in a residential street in St John's."
Shock, horror! - people living in a residential street.
What next? - cows living in the countryside?Hwicce

"It was approved despite concerns up to 18 people could be living at the property, which is in a residential street in St John's." Shock, horror! - people living in a residential street. What next? - cows living in the countryside?

Score: 6

danieled says...12:02pm Wed 26 Mar 14

Hwicce wrote…

"It was approved despite concerns up to 18 people could be living at the property, which is in a residential street in St John's." Shock, horror! - people living in a residential street. What next? - cows living in the countryside?

That's journalism for you!!

[quote][p][bold]Hwicce[/bold] wrote:
"It was approved despite concerns up to 18 people could be living at the property, which is in a residential street in St John's."
Shock, horror! - people living in a residential street.
What next? - cows living in the countryside?[/p][/quote]That's journalism for you!!danieled

Hwicce wrote…

"It was approved despite concerns up to 18 people could be living at the property, which is in a residential street in St John's." Shock, horror! - people living in a residential street. What next? - cows living in the countryside?

That's journalism for you!!

Score: 0

danieled says...12:02pm Wed 26 Mar 14

Hwicce wrote…

"It was approved despite concerns up to 18 people could be living at the property, which is in a residential street in St John's." Shock, horror! - people living in a residential street. What next? - cows living in the countryside?

That's journalism for you!!

[quote][p][bold]Hwicce[/bold] wrote:
"It was approved despite concerns up to 18 people could be living at the property, which is in a residential street in St John's."
Shock, horror! - people living in a residential street.
What next? - cows living in the countryside?[/p][/quote]That's journalism for you!!danieled

Hwicce wrote…

"It was approved despite concerns up to 18 people could be living at the property, which is in a residential street in St John's." Shock, horror! - people living in a residential street. What next? - cows living in the countryside?

That's journalism for you!!

Score: -1

Jabbadad says...1:13pm Wed 26 Mar 14

Chris Chapman, from the council's housing team, admitted there was no legal control measures to prevent there being 18 people there, but an agreement is in place for a limit to be set at 10. Wonder how 9 double rooms can be expected to be for 10 people only, what a stupid statement Mr Chapman. Perhaps you would give personal assurance on this issue. About time public servants became responsible

Chris Chapman, from the council's housing team, admitted there was no legal control measures to prevent there being 18 people there, but an agreement is in place for a limit to be set at 10.
Wonder how 9 double rooms can be expected to be for 10 people only, what a stupid statement Mr Chapman. Perhaps you would give personal assurance on this issue. About time public servants became responsibleJabbadad

Chris Chapman, from the council's housing team, admitted there was no legal control measures to prevent there being 18 people there, but an agreement is in place for a limit to be set at 10. Wonder how 9 double rooms can be expected to be for 10 people only, what a stupid statement Mr Chapman. Perhaps you would give personal assurance on this issue. About time public servants became responsible

Ipsoregulated

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standardards Organisations's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a compaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here