Do Masculine Names Help Female Lawyers Become Judges?

This paper provides the first empirical test of the Portia Hypothesis:Females with masculine monikers are more successful in legalcareers. Utilizing South Carolina microdata, we look for correlationbetween an individual’s advancement to a judgeship and his/hername’s masculinity, which we construct from the joint empiricaldistribution of names and gender in the state’s entire populationof registered voters. We find robust evidence that nominallymasculine females are favored over other females. Hence, ourresults support the Portia Hypothesis.

Source: “Do Masculine Names Help Female Lawyers Become Judges? Evidence from South Carolina” from American Law and Economics Review 2009 11(1):112-133

You should follow me on Twitter here. You can also subscribe to the blog’s feed or follow on Facebook. If you want to help support the blog, please do your Amazon shopping via this link.Here are the site’s most popular posts of all time.