*Prices in US$ apply to orders placed in the Americas only. Prices in GBP apply to orders placed in Great Britain only. Prices in € represent the retail prices valid in Germany (unless otherwise indicated). Prices are subject to change without notice. Prices do not include postage and handling if applicable. RRP: Recommended Retail Price.

Abstract

The data-set of the casualties of terrorist attacks in the Years of Lead in Italy is analyzed in order to empirically test theoretical open issues about terrorist activity. The first is whether Richardson’s law holds true when the scale is narrowed down from global to only one epoch of domestic terrorism in a single country. It is found that the power law is a plausible model. Then, the distribution of the inter-arrival times between two consecutive strikes is investigated, finding (weaker) indications that also for this parameter a power law is a plausible model and that this is the result of non-stationary dynamics of terrorist activity. The implications of this finding on the models available today for explaining a power law in the severity of attacks are then discussed. The paper also highlights the counter-intuitive implications that a power law distribution of the waiting times has for a State inferring the time to the next strike from the observation of the time already elapsed since the previous one. Further, it is shown how the analysis of the inter-arrival times provides estimates about the temporal evolution of terrorist strength that can help discriminating among competing hypotheses derived from qualitative analysis. Finally, a simplified mathematical model of the policy decision-making process is constructed to show how the nature of power laws biases the prioritizing of the policy agenda and the consequent allocation of resources to concurring issues. It is shown how the bias causes systematical relative underfunding of policy issues whose severity follows a power law distribution and that this trend is likely to persist until a major event will reverse the behavior of the decision-maker, then causing relative overfunding.

Davis, P.M., Jackson, D.D., Kagan, Y.Y., (1989), The Longer it has been Since the Last Earthquake, The Longer the Expected Time till the Next?, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 79, pp. 1439–1456.Google Scholar

Epstein, J.M., (2002), Modeling Civil Violence: An Agent Based Computational Approach, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 10–3, pp. 7243–7250.Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Marco Marcovina, PhD, E-mail:

aMarco Marcovina, PhD from Politecnico di Torino. He is currently employee of the ANFR (Agence Nationale des Fréquences) in Brest, France. He conducted this research in his own capacity. This research is not related to his current employment, nor in any ways represents the views of his employer.

Related Content

Comments (0)

General note: By using the comment function on degruyter.com you agree to our Privacy Statement. A respectful treatment of one another is important to us. Therefore we would like to draw your attention to our House Rules.