If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

I still don't understand how anyone argues this. It's a freaking ID card. Read a report that said 4000 illegals were registered to vote in MI. That's not ok. The only rational I can come up with is that the dims continue to fight this because they know that they benefit from the fraud. That's not ok either. It's funny to me how they continue to wrap this up in some sort of constitutional rights issue when that's not what it is...it sure makes for a good story though.

"The thing I admire about the rat tail is that it takes commitment. It's not like one day you just decide you want one, you have to grow out that bad boy and you have to repeatedly convince the hairdresser to trust you because it's a great idea."

I still don't understand how anyone argues this. It's a freaking ID card. Read a report that said 4000 illegals were registered to vote in MI. That's not ok. The only rational I can come up with is that the dims continue to fight this because they know that they benefit from the fraud. That's not ok either. It's funny to me how they continue to wrap this up in some sort of constitutional rights issue when that's not what it is...it sure makes for a good story though.

It's total BS and they know it. But when they have no intellectual honesty to start with, what's the difference?

I still don't understand how anyone argues this. It's a freaking ID card. Read a report that said 4000 illegals were registered to vote in MI. That's not ok. The only rational I can come up with is that the dims continue to fight this because they know that they benefit from the fraud. That's not ok either. It's funny to me how they continue to wrap this up in some sort of constitutional rights issue when that's not what it is...it sure makes for a good story though.

Agree 100%. I have been wondering why anyone would fight having a photo ID. Best way to make sure who is who. As far as I can see this in no way keeps people from voting by having to have a photo ID.

charly

"Well, you know even though I'm old my body should not be worn out.............I'm a lazy person so I never used it enough to wear it out"

This is a red herring, agenda driven push, supported by NO facts. A solution looking for a problem.

Perry County Alabama has a history of inventive voting. Every four years or so, the Alabama Attorney General makes the case against this or that election official there. Sometimes they win, sometimes they don't. A few years ago, a case was made against a county election official but....the judge hearing the case was the 1st cousin to the clerk who had been indicted. He didn't feel it appropriate to recuse himself and the clerk was found not guilty in a requested bench trial.

When the US Attorney General looked in on Perry County, the chap investigating the case became so frustrated by the Eric Holder group in Washington that he quit in disgust and wrote a book in which he details case after case of voter fraud.

This last time though really made the case. Uniontown, Perry County, had 125% of the registered voters turn-out for the election. The Perry County Clerk found this not particlularly unusual and offered excuses.

I don't have all that high falootin learnin the rest of you guys do. If voting is a right in the constitution, it's a right. they shouldn't be able to throw this picture id thing in there to suit the needs of one particular party. that would be infringing upon one's constitutional right to vote. State elections should be governed by each individual state. Presidential elections should fall under federal guidelines. Voting is a protected constitutional right, without a side bar that says you have to show a picture of your self to excercise that right. My point was that there is no such provision saying that you have to have a picture ID to vote in the presidential election. the constitution does guarantee your right to vote though.