DMINLGP

DMin, Leadership and Global Perspectives: Crafting Ministry in an Interconnected World

Leadership Shift

One of the most impactful sermon series we do every year in the youth ministry is our series focused on identity. I learned very quickly that young people desire to “know” who they are and respond great to messages on identity. The response we so overwhelming year after year that we try to incorporate in every message or at least a part of the service to include a message on identity. As I began to minister to adults, I noticed that they too struggled with identity issues maybe even more so than younger people as their network of influences have grown and now have more voices telling them who they are/are not.

Identity can be defined as, “the condition of being oneself or itself, and not another: condition or character as to who a person or what a thing is; the qualities, beliefs, etc., that distinguish or identify a person or thing.[1] While definitions of identity vary depending on the source, in general, it is dealing with the way someone/thing views themselves in relationships (as in relation to things outside ourselves). See table for use of word “identity” over time In our rapidly changing society where connections are copious, relationships can be attenuated, thus causing a fluidity of identity. The Network Society provides an almost unlimited amount of transactional relationship, while at the same time not providing a clear identifying relationship in which one can identify themselves.[2] Charles Taylor in his book, A Secular Age, in addressing the identity issue speaks to the matter and the rise of individualism. Taylor says that we now live in a “culture of authenticity” which he defines as, “the understanding of life which emerges with the Romantic expressivism of the late-eighteenth century, that each one of us has his/her own way of realizing our humanity, and that it is important to find and live out one’s own, as against surrendering to conformity with a model imposed on us from outside, by society, or the previous generation, or religious or political authority.” [3] Simply put we live in a society where people think they can know themselves by themselves and therefore create an identity without outside relationships. The outside relationships, thus, become durables for us rather than helping to delineate identity in us.

In reading Handbook of Leadership Theory and Practice it acknowledges that scholarship on the subject of leadership and therefore leadership itself, has also become entangled in the web of outcome /economic driven results and therefore followers/employees are nothing more than commodities.[4] It also acknowledges the growing field of research of Identity-based leadership or meaning-making leadership.[5] In this growing field the book provides this definition of leadership:

“Leadership is about understanding the way people and organizations behave, about creating and strengthening relationships, about building commitment, about establishing a group identity, and about adapting behavior to increase effectiveness. It is also about creating meaning. True leaders are merchants of hope, speaking to the collective imagination of their followers, co-opting them to join them in a great adventure.”[6]

If we had a picture of Jesus, I would imagine that it would be beside this definition of leadership. When we read the Scriptures, we see a Jesus, through the fullness of the Spirit, knew his identity, even as a young boy (but also grew into a more mature understanding). He knew his purpose and who sent him. The Gospel of John records seven “I am” statements that Jesus makes during his ministry: “I am the bread of life, I am the light of the world, I am the gate, I am the good shepherd, I am the resurrection and the life, I am the way, the truth, and the life and I am the vine” (John 6:35; 8:12, 10:9, 11; 11:25, 14:6; 15:5). In John 8:58, Jesus says, “Before Abraham was, I Am.” In understanding himself, Jesus understood who he was in his community (local) and the community of God (global, think all of history). The point being, Jesus knew who he was because of outside relationships and therefore also lead others to find who they are, in connection to the Triune God and others (identity-based leadership).

As I seek to understand, how the church can cultivate leaders, in the millennial and post-millennial generation within our post-modern culture, it would seem that shifting our understanding of leadership is necessary. The shift from a positional and producing based relationship to an identity forming (mean-making) space of development might provide the church with the opportunity to engage culture rather than become endangered in it.

About the Author

Mario Hood

Most importantly, I am married to the love of my life, Misty Hood, and I'm kept on my toes all day every day, by my son Dalen and daughter Cola Hood. I also serve as the Next Generation Pastor at Church On The Living Edge in Orlando, Florida, under the leadership of Senior Pastor, Dr. Mark Chironna as well as being a Youth and Family Life coach.

3 responses to “Leadership Shift”

The quote you lift up Mario is so IMPERATIVE for anyone in parish/congregational ministry. When there isn’t a hopeful message, when members aren’t invited along on the “great adventure” it can truly devastate a community.

I too posted on meaning making leadership and it is so foundational to the work we do . . . especially with youth . . . especially with identity. Great post!

Mario, I can see that you have been hanging around Digby and now your posts raise my eyebrows like his! Great post and great insights. I wonder (to quote Dr. Clark), if the church originally defined leadership as forming (and reforming) the identity of believers to be like Jesus? Perhaps in the West, we co opted the original Eastern understanding into our culture’s cultic fascination with position and production? I wonder, if perhaps we are returning to our leader’s original intention for leadership development? Great job, Mario!

Hi Mario. Your post was enlightening. I appreciated your focus on identity and your definition of it – the way someone views themselves in relation to outside themselves. This is an important area of research (since it is who we are within, not our face in the world) and I’m glad you highlighted it. I also liked the fact that you stressed the point that ‘outside relationships become durables for us rather than delineating our identity.’ It is important, as you did, that we look at Jesus and begin to understand the importance of self-identity through Him. Powerful ‘stuff,’ Mario!