With the ongoing inquest into the 7/7 terror attacks a correspondent asks: Where and who were Peter Powers’ agents in his mock bombings. Where did they go? Have they been eliminated from the enquiry OR ARE THEY THE ENQUIRY?

Research into particle physics is revealing a world full of almost magical qualities. Could it be that this mysterious, puzzling world is in fact the world of the spirit – the spiritual world that saints and mystics throughout history have sought to explo

Gen. Leonid Ivashov was Chief of Staff of Russian armed forces when the 9/11 attacks took place, but he says, they weren’t carried out by Osama or al-Qaeeda. The most likely culprits, says the General, were transnational mafias and international oligarchs

More than being an insider’s confirmation of the power of the pro-Israel lobby over Congress, the former US Senator’s letter also calls into question Noam Chomsky’s increasingly suspect looking motives

Despite this, the poll, carried out by Mori, found three out of four people thought there was now a great deal or a fair amount of tension between races and nationalities.

And almost two in three feared tension was certain or likely to lead to violence, although it is not clear whether people are imagining full-blown street riots or minor scuffles.

Mr Phillips told BBC News: “What worries me is if that friction starts to catch fire – if people do genuinely believe it’s going to catch fire then we’re in trouble.

“This finding may reflect not what is happening today but the story that’s been told of the last 40 years – that if you get people of different kinds together then eventually there’s going to be trouble.”

The survey was commissioned to mark the 40th anniversary of Enoch Powell’s infamous “rivers of blood” speech, in which he described the indigenous population’s “sense of alarm and resentment” over immigration.

Speaking of his foreboding, he said: “Like the Roman, I seem to see the river Tiber foaming with blood.”

BBC home editor Mark Easton says Powell’s words, spoken to a small gathering in Birmingham’s Midland hotel, still echo down the decades.

He says the effect of Powell’s speech was in fact to force the issue of immigration off the political agenda, with any politician who ventured to broach the subject risking being accused of playing the race card.

This situation still exists 40 years later, our correspondent says.

Five months ago, a Tory candidate in Birmingham, Nigel Hastilow, was forced to step down by David Cameron for saying Powell was right that uncontrolled immigration would change Britain irrevocably.
However, the BBC poll finds many people share that view.

Asked if they thought immigration meant their local area didn’t feel like Britain any more, a quarter of the sample agreed – double the amount who felt this three years ago.

Six out of 10 said immigration had made parts of Britain feel like a foreign country.

When Tory leader Michael Howard suggested communities couldn’t cope with the pace of immigration during the 2005 general election campaign, he was accused of racism.

However, our correspondent says immigration is now back on the political agenda.

He says: “One reason politicians can debate it again, perhaps, is that the latest wave of immigration is different.

“The million Eastern Europeans who’ve come to the UK in the last three or four years are not looking to settle for good. Their motives are economic. And perhaps most importantly they are white.

“Forty years after Enoch Powell, the issues of race and immigration have been separated once more.”

Immigration Minister Liam Byrne said the government knew immigration was a top concern among voters.

He said: “That is why 2008 sees the biggest shake-up to immigration and border security in 45 years, with a points system like the one in Australia and new rules to make people earn their stay in the UK, including speaking English and abiding by our rules.

“That is what is going to make our immigration system fit for the future.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7352125.stm

Comment – April 19, 2008

This is rich coming from the BBC, one of the Illuminati’s premier propaganda tools, the very organisation that helped create this situation in the first place.

How so? Well back in the early fifties when large-scale immigration into Britain really started the BBC began a subtle propaganda campaign which became manifest in the sixties, I should know because my father was one of those immigrants.

The essence of this program was to paint those who voiced concern about immigration as “racists” and set them up as figures to be mocked and derided.

Of course many of those concerned about immigration weren’t necessarily “racist” but it helped frame the debate. So that those who voiced concern over immigration could automatically be branded as “racist” and their arguments ignored.

I still remember “Till Death Us Do Part”, a sixties BBC comedy which played a part in this ruse. The series was later remade for U.S. audiences in “All in the Family” but in the original the central character was Alf Garnett, a stereotypical Cockney East Ender: patriotic, misogynistic, bigoted and racist who continually derided “wogs” and “blacks”.

Ostensibly it was comedy but it helped portray legitimate concerns as figures of fun to be derided and ignored.

For years it was the BBC’s top comedy and it helped further the Illuminati’s agenda of divide and rule.

So now when people should waking up to the fact that a hidden elite rules us, many are being distracted by what are essentially side issues. Such as issues of race and immigration, which should have been confronted and dealt with decades ago.

Interviewed in 2009, the man who went on to become ‘Jihadi John’ condemned 9/11 and 7/7 as “wrong”. However the fact that he didn’t mention false flags suggests he’s either a dupe, a dummy or a double agent