On 2018-02-08 23:25:56 +0000, PeterN said:
> On 2/8/2018 3:48 PM, nospam wrote:
>> In article<p5iclm0j6h@news2.newsguy.com>, PeterN
>> <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>> OTA would not work for me. Indoor reception is terrible, and use of an
>>>>> outdoor antenna is not permitted.
>>>>
>>>> yes it is.
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/installing-consumer-owned-anten...
>>>> and-satellite-dishes>
>>>> Under the OTARD rules, an owner or a tenant has the right to install
>>>> an antenna on property that he owns or over which he has exclusive
>>>> use or control. This includes single family homes, condominiums,
>>>> cooperatives, townhomes and manufactured homes.
>>>>
>>> What is written is one thing. Practicality is something else. I am not
>>> about to spend time in litigation, creating a brouhaha with my
>>> neighbors, to save a few bucks. There is much more to life. e.g. It cost
>>> us about $50,000 in damages, plus legal fees, because our board would
>>> not permit a companion dog, which is expressly permitted under the ADA.
>>> The US attorney handled the litigation for the woman.
>>
>> put an antenna *inside* your apartment, in window. done.
>>
>
> I did say that would give bad reception.
Got a cat?
<http://assets.amuniversal.com/38b8d820d38f01350bcb005056a9545d>
--
teleportation kills