These people are running for president. Considering that the elections are 10 weeks away or something like that, I'd like there to be a vote. Whoever does NOT have 4 votes by tommorow afternoon will not qualifty for debates, actual ticket on the ballot and will be treated as a "3rd party" candidate. Candidates CAN NOT vote for themselves. Please take heed as this will determine who gets picked in debates, interviews, and campaign things. This is more to see who gets picked into the primaries. Just put your name under the person. Thanks.

At 4/21/2012 4:14:45 PM, Viper-King wrote:These people are running for president. Considering that the elections are 10 weeks away or something like that, I'd like there to be a vote. Whoever does NOT have 4 votes by tommorow afternoon will not qualifty for debates, actual ticket on the ballot and will be treated as a "3rd party" candidate. Candidates CAN NOT vote for themselves. Please take heed as this will determine who gets picked in debates, interviews, and campaign things. This is more to see who gets picked into the primaries. Just put your name under the person. Thanks.

At 4/21/2012 4:14:45 PM, Viper-King wrote:These people are running for president. Considering that the elections are 10 weeks away or something like that, I'd like there to be a vote. Whoever does NOT have 4 votes by tommorow afternoon will not qualifty for debates, actual ticket on the ballot and will be treated as a "3rd party" candidate. Candidates CAN NOT vote for themselves. Please take heed as this will determine who gets picked in debates, interviews, and campaign things. This is more to see who gets picked into the primaries. Just put your name under the person. Thanks.

In adition to imabench's point, I think you are overextending your authority here a bit.

More importantly, the actual campaigning at this point in time is very light, and simply working out who is contesting for candidacy. When we get a bit more certain campaigners (I think we know who is running, but the 16k / JT situation needs a resolution) and stronger campaigning, then I think we can be certain on the events.

Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. Teach him how to be Gay, he'll positively influence the GDP.

At 4/21/2012 4:28:17 PM, Stephen_Hawkins wrote:In adition to imabench's point, I think you are overextending your authority here a bit.

More importantly, the actual campaigning at this point in time is very light, and simply working out who is contesting for candidacy. When we get a bit more certain campaigners (I think we know who is running, but the 16k / JT situation needs a resolution) and stronger campaigning, then I think we can be certain on the events.

I will make a platform if I get past this stage, it is less extreme then JT's, but has some similar aspects

At 4/21/2012 4:28:17 PM, Stephen_Hawkins wrote:In adition to imabench's point, I think you are overextending your authority here a bit.

More importantly, the actual campaigning at this point in time is very light, and simply working out who is contesting for candidacy. When we get a bit more certain campaigners (I think we know who is running, but the 16k / JT situation needs a resolution) and stronger campaigning, then I think we can be certain on the events.

I know. I'm not telling who can run and who can't. I'm just stating that those who don't reach the qualification will be treated more like 3rd party candidates from me when I'm writing on the DDO Blog. This has nothing to do with the "real election" that is modded my Ore_Ele, this is just about what I'm doing for interview, etc.

At 4/21/2012 4:14:45 PM, Viper-King wrote:These people are running for president. Considering that the elections are 10 weeks away or something like that, I'd like there to be a vote. Whoever does NOT have 4 votes by tommorow afternoon will not qualifty for debates, actual ticket on the ballot and will be treated as a "3rd party" candidate. Candidates CAN NOT vote for themselves. Please take heed as this will determine who gets picked in debates, interviews, and campaign things. This is more to see who gets picked into the primaries. Just put your name under the person. Thanks.

At 4/21/2012 4:14:45 PM, Viper-King wrote:These people are running for president. Considering that the elections are 10 weeks away or something like that, I'd like there to be a vote. Whoever does NOT have 4 votes by tommorow afternoon will not qualifty for debates, actual ticket on the ballot and will be treated as a "3rd party" candidate. Candidates CAN NOT vote for themselves. Please take heed as this will determine who gets picked in debates, interviews, and campaign things. This is more to see who gets picked into the primaries. Just put your name under the person. Thanks.

Stephen Hawkins & RoyalPaladin:

DarkKermit & Imabench

Thaddeus & Tvellatot.

16Kadams & Freeman.

Who made you Ore_Ele?

I already clarified. I'm not using some sort of authority. This is just for the DDO BlogSpot.

Well, everyone wants Big Issues to be updated. Everyone wants to bring meaningful members in, and/or back. And just about everyone wants to keep the basi banning system we have now, with some additions/ajustments.

Well, everyone wants Big Issues to be updated. Everyone wants to bring meaningful members in, and/or back. And just about everyone wants to keep the basi banning system we have now, with some additions/ajustments.

Question fro me is, who can talk to Juggle the best?

Personally, I would say innomen, and look how far that got us... I don't think it will improve masses depending on how good our communication is, rather, it depends how strong the communications with Juggle are. Regardless, the Big Issues needs updating, but the policies that everyone has are trivial at best.

Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. Teach him how to be Gay, he'll positively influence the GDP.