Remembering the Victims

The 2018 International Human Rights Day was more of a funeral than a celebration in the Middle East. The wreckage caused by the autocratic crackdowns on the Arab uprisings of 2011 has created perhaps the worst regional human rights environment since the 1980s. But while few who work on or in the Middle East can be optimistic these days, there are reasons to believe that human rights norms are poised for a revival in the not-too-distant future.

The present situation offers few signs of such a revival. Saudi Arabia has captured the headlines over the past two months since the brazen murder of Jamal Khashoggi. Saudi prisons are full of civil society activists, human rights campaigners, independent religious figures, and potential sources of opposition to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The viciousness of the crackdown is directly related to the prince’s insecurity at home and the failure of his policies abroad.

However, the human rights catastrophe is not limited to Saudi Arabia. Bahrain remains unrepentant for its brutal, sectarian crackdown on the 2011 uprising. The United Arab Emirates retains an iron grip on its public sphere. Egypt is mired in perhaps the most oppressive environment since the years of president Gamal Abdel Nasser. Tens of thousands of political prisoners languish in Egyptian jails, while hyper-vigilant and capricious security services arrest a steady stream of independent voices for often minor displays of criticism. Harsh new laws governing the media and non-governmental organizations have constricted the margins of civil life.

Turkey, too, is in one of the worst human rights crises of modern times. Since the abortive coup against Recep Tayyib Erdogan in 2016, the Turkish state has undergone a systematic purge of alleged Gülenists, academics, journalists, and other critical voices. Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank suffer from abuses at the hands of all parties, including Hamas, the Palestinian Authority, and Israel. Yemeni suffering because of the Saudi-UAE blockade and severe Houthi rule has reached crisis levels, despite the fact that Yemeni parties reached an agreement on the port of Hodeida this week, which may improve the situation. Syrians continue to suffer war and displacement even as President Bashar al-Assad’s regime regains control over the country, and there are few signs that justice for its crimes during the conflict will be served anytime soon.

Why would anyone see hope for human rights in this environment? The tragic trajectory of the region since those electric moments of hope in 2011 certainly chastens anyone even considering optimistic projections. But several recent events suggest that the moment of impunity may be nearing its final stages. The campaign for justice for Jamal Khashoggi has led a wide swathe of Western media to rediscover the escalating pattern of Saudi human rights abuses since the ascension of Mohammed bin Salman. The remarkable scale and endurance of the pressure on Saudi Arabia, its bipartisan backing in the United States (leading to a Senate vote on December 13 to end U.S. participation in the Yemen conflict), and the inability of Saudi propaganda to block the criticism, are all new.

There are several factors which suggest that human rights may soon return as a viable normative force in the region. The most important is the impending change in American politics. Whoever replaces Donald Trump as president of the United States is very likely to reprioritize human rights. The backlash against Trumpism is going to be fast and furious, and the next president—Republican or Democrat—will almost certainly seek to differentiate himself or herself as much as possible from the current administration. The autocrats of the Middle East who have taken full advantage of Trump’s disregard for human rights have in the process allowed themselves to become viewed through a partisan lens, and are not ready for the backlash that they may soon face.

Contempt for human rights is one of those core attributes of Trumpism that the bipartisan foreign policy community in the United States nearly unanimously rejects. Increasingly, so too is Trump’s uncritical support of Saudi Arabia and Mohammed bin Salman. Since the Khashoggi killing this has been forcefully challenged by Republican stalwarts, such as Senators Lindsey Graham and Bob Corker. The outlines of this post-Trump focus on reclaiming U.S. leadership on values can already be seen in the positioning of almost every plausible presidential candidate, and in the rapid rise of junior senators critical of the Saudi war in Yemen, such as Democrat Chris Murphy and Republican Todd Young.

The form and nature of this post-Trump return to a discourse of American values is more likely to focus on human rights than on democracy promotion. While the next president will likely want to be seen as more committed to moral leadership, there is little appetite left (if there ever was one) in the United States for advancing true democratization in the Middle East. Focusing on human rights offers a way to reorient U.S. policy without entering controversies over democracy promotion or regime change. Everyone can likely agree on demanding that allied regimes scale back their arrests and torture of activists, ease their iron grip on media and civil society, and allow a wider margin of political opposition.

The regimes will of course aggressively resist any such pressure, but may find themselves hamstrung as they confront the reality of the political predicament they have created through their own post-2011 policies. Egypt since the 2013 coup is only the most extreme case of a wider trend in the region in which the hollowing out of political institutions has left few avenues for managing discontent. In the absence of serious domestic or external constraints, most regimes are relentlessly expanding their repression out of a profound sense of insecurity. But each incremental increase in repression only increases the likelihood of new political crises involving popular mobilization as economic hardship escalates, as civil society develops new forms of mobilization, and as the international arena grows less supportive. The underlying problems revealed by the Arab uprisings have only grown worse, and the restless, creative, and deeply unsatisfied force of Arab youth will almost inevitably seek an outlet for its frustrations.

Human rights could emerge as a useful compromise—a positive, normative set of values with indicators for which the next U.S. administration can push. Autocrats may reluctantly go along with this to avoid stronger demands. International Human Rights Day may remain a grim affair in the Middle East for the coming years, but prospects for something better may be closer than we know.

Post your comments 2500 character limit. No links or markup permitted. Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Screen names appear with your comment.

Screen Name

Follow the conversation—Sign up to receive email updates when comments are posted to this article.

Email Address

Characters Used 0

Mirel

December 15, 20188:56 pm

The article is speaking about Middle East. Iran is probably one of the worst countries of the world in the human rights, but situated in Western Asia. "Western Asia, West Asia, Southwestern Asia or Southwest Asia is the westernmost subregion of Asia. The concept is in limited use, as it significantly overlaps with the Middle East (or the Near East), the main difference usually being the exclusion of the majority of Egypt (which would be counted as part of North Africa) and the inclusion of the Caucasus." (Wikipedia)
What is strange that the Syrian nation half living as refugees after an ethnic cleansing , other half killed and carpet bombed is not mentioned enough.
The role of Russia and Iran that are participating actively to Assad's crimes of war are also not mentioned. Nearly a quarter of the article is dedicated to USA and Trump that their fault is by not intervening in the Middle East and retiring American forces. The almost daily terror attacks of the Palestinians under Hamas against the Israeli citizen, the subversive activity of the Muslim Brotherhood.an umbrella organization for terror groups in Egypt is also not mentioned, neither the war of Egypt army against ISIL in Sinai ... In Yemen is a Civil War where the rebels, sustained by Iran, are also not mentioned. We can't conceive human rights discussion without mentioning the entire cast and different situations. A biased article by no doubt and mostly due to the omissions omissions.

Comment Policy

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.