SBA OHA: Increased Competition Not Part of NAICS Code Decision

When designating the NAICS code for a solicitation, the procuring agency should not consider which NAICS code will help increase competition and decrease the risks of unsuccessful performance.

According to a recent decision of the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, these factors should play no bearing on an agency’s NAICS code designation. Instead, in most cases, the agency must select the NAICS code that best describes the principal purpose of the product or service being acquired.

Pacific Shipyards International, LLC filed a NAICS code appeal with SBA OHA. Pacific Shipyards alleged that the correct NAICS code was 336611 (Ship Building and Repairing), which carries a 1,000-employee size standard. Among its arguments, Pacific Shipyards contended that selecting NAICS code 488310 restricted competition and increased the risk of unsuccessful performance of the contract.

SBA OHA rejected this argument, deeming it “meritless.” SBA OHA wrote that Pacific Shipyards had offered no evidence to support its allegation that NAICS code 488310 would reduce competition and increase performance risks, and “even if [these arguments] were shown to be valid, OHA has held that such considerations are not part of the criteria for selecting the NAICS code.” Rather, “by regulation, the CO must designate the NAICS code that best describes the principal purpose of the product or service being acquired.” SBA OHA denied Pacific Shipyards’ NAICS code appeal.

SBA OHA’s conclusion in Pacific Shipyards makes sense. After all, if Contracting Officers were permitted to consider which NAICS code would increase competition, they would be motivated to select the NAICS code carrying the largest possible size standard, to the potential detriment of smaller businesses.

This blog is for educational purposes only. Nothing posted on this blog constitutes or substitutes for legal advice, which can only be obtained from a personal consultation with a qualified attorney. Using this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the author and/or Koprince Law LLC. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this blog is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Koprince Law LLC.