pat stay got the judges decision against verb. i watched it and thought it was a debatable very back and forth battle. it was definitely pretty good a bit shy of great. math hoffa beat ill will 2-1 in what was claimed as performance of the night. math did very well but i wasn't as amazed as the recaps suggested. like his 2nd round was being gassed up as almost a classic round which it wasn't, but it was definitely good. didn't watch the other battles.

__________________"say 'his style is very painterly' but paintings not an art
art is tricking you with statements that the painter's painting art
without an explanation it's just pretty little marks
the market sold imaginations just to keep you in the dark"

blik bodied luck. the first minute or two of luck's round was fire, though. it reminded me a bit of half past 7 bigg k.

magic beat j murda, but i understand the judges' decision. murda had a lot more punches. magic rapped. both did well for only 7 days prep. pretty enjoyable for what it was. in a few years, we're probably gonna say magic beat him.

daylyt clearly beat loso by being remotely interesting, even with that choke. both had laughably bad material, but one was tongue-in-cheek while the other was completely serious. daylyt's presence was top-tier. robbery.

math's first two rounds were damn near classic. suuuuper fire rounds. will went second. i feel he coasted off of the excitement for math, but he was still great. clear win for math in my opinion, not to downplay will. fire battle. math won judges' decision.

pat vs verb was fantastic. it had a few dry spots throughout. its replay value with be there, though. pat had a good first. verb's first was better imo, but i understand it being debatable. pat bodied the second with one of his best rounds of all time. it perfectly toed the line between uncomfortable territory and genuine humor. both of their thirds were forgettable. i had verb taking the third too, but pat winning overall. i don't judge by rounds. pat's second shifted what was a pretty close battle in the moment. pat won the judges' decision. i don't really care to debate or agree with it.

Yea RBE is using a "new judging system" where it is based off points so a person can lose 2 rounds and still win
Most of the decisions were robberies; the only one they got completely right was the Pat battle (I'm not counting the 2 early lower tier battles)
The one I aint mad at is J Murda, altho I felt Magic's shit was a tad better

my prediction for pat vs verb was surprisingly wrong, I thought for sure pat stay was gonna get robbed..I mean not just pat but just in general I figured judging is so flawed it robs people, but based on some reads judging is still flawed lol

__________________
i'm a biased god, if it's not american i'm not caring.

Isn't that what the Knamelis 2.X thing did, which ultimately just failed because Knamelis is a shitty, shitty judge

Corrected that for you. I don't think Knamelis got a single decision right after he made the 2.0 version.

__________________
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Autoloss list:
Saloon doors/ swinging bars
Michael Vick/ dogs bars
Unironic kids movie gun bars
Any reference to a movie where you state exactly what happened in that movie without changing it

Yea RBE is using a "new judging system" where it is based off points so a person can lose 2 rounds and still win
Most of the decisions were robberies; the only one they got completely right was the Pat battle (I'm not counting the 2 early lower tier battles)
The one I aint mad at is J Murda, altho I felt Magic's shit was a tad better

All that said, these were good battles

I dont think you could lose 2 rounds and win. The way I understood it, a round could end in a tie, and the judges could split the other two rounds. So if the result was each battler won a round, and tied the third round, the decision would go to the battler that won their round by the largest margin.

I dont think you could lose 2 rounds and win. The way I understood it, a round could end in a tie, and the judges could split the other two rounds. So if the result was each battler won a round, and tied the third round, the decision would go to the battler that won their round by the largest margin.

I could be wrong though.

That is the justification they're selling cuz people been hamming about the Daylyt shit but they sayin points are the determining factor

Loso tweeted this picture to speak on the strength of Daylyt's "aura" with Day getting a 7 in his choke round but he inadvertently showed they had him losin the 1st and had Day edging the 2nd by a "+" haha (although Day won both of those rounds much clearer)
but I ain't mad I guess; as long as people know this is the system then is what it is

pat stay got the judges decision against verb. i watched it and thought it was a debatable very back and forth battle. it was definitely pretty good a bit shy of great. math hoffa beat ill will 2-1 in what was claimed as performance of the night. math did very well but i wasn't as amazed as the recaps suggested. like his 2nd round was being gassed up as almost a classic round which it wasn't, but it was definitely good. didn't watch the other battles.

Good to hear Math took this battle serious, the original Ill Will if you will.

Loso tweeted this picture to speak on the strength of Daylyt's "aura" with Day getting a 7 in his choke round but he inadvertently showed they had him losin the 1st and had Day edging the 2nd by a "+" haha (although Day won both of those rounds much clearer)
but I ain't mad I guess; as long as people know this is the system then is what it is

When using the boxing system there is no 10-10 or 10-10+ only 10-9 10-8 10-7. This is just a way to be able to jerk Daylyt.

When he judges on champion its always if you win 2 rounds you win the battle