My father wants to upgrade his 4850 and asked me if $200 would be enough. I've recently upgraded to a 7850 and have been mostly happy with it*, so I'm inclined to think that he should pony up an extra $60 or so to get that. However, what do y'all think about the ~$200 cards available right now? Would they be enough of an upgrade to make it worth his money? If so, which card(s)? He mostly plays Star Trek Online, some Star Wars: TOR, and he'll be playing Diablo 3.

I'm going to agree that the Radeon HD7850 is a good upgrade from the Radeon HD4850, even if it is currently going for $247½ and up. If that's too much money to spend, he could wait for prices to drop. NVidia is rumored to be bringing GeForce GTX660Ti to market in the second half of the year.

The other alternative would be for Dad to get you a new Radeon HD7950 or GeForce GTX670 and you could let him have your "old" Radeon HD7850.

A 4850 is fine for now, and the GTX 660 will add some much-needed $200 competition.Diablo III runs pretty well at 1080p on a 9800GTX, which is around the same as a 4850 if I remember correctly. It's not buttery smooth but it's more than playable. I wait to upgrade until my old card doesn't run things the way I want it to, and the only way to really know something so subjective is to wait and try it yourself.

Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.

Sorry I forgot to post his monitor size. It's 22". He played the D3 beta and didn't mention any issues, but I know that Star Wars: TOR doesn't run very smoothly for him at max settings. I had a 4870, and that game was precisely why I decided to upgrade. My father and I both shoot for our games being playable at max settings whenever our budgets allow. : )

Sorry I forgot to post his monitor size. It's 22". He played the D3 beta and didn't mention any issues, but I know that Star Wars: TOR doesn't run very smoothly for him at max settings.

Then a 6870 is a pretty decent option at $150 after a rebate. I haven't played SW:ToR yet but if it's anything like other MMO's then a good CPU, SSD and internet connection are equally important to stop the juddering. My 6850 drives a 1920x1080p screen just fine, though ME3 is about the newest game I've played.

Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.

Imo, for your dad, the HD 7850 or the GTX 560 ti (which wouldn't, imo, deserve to be bought now at the end of it's life cycle) would be overkill. Not to mention he is still rocking a Core 2 Quad. So i'd suggest a HD 7770 equiped with a nice and quiet custom cooler.

nVidia video drivers FAIL, click for more infoDisclaimer: All answers and suggestions are provided by an enthusiastic amateur and are therefore without warranty either explicit or implicit. Basically you use my suggestions at your own risk.

A 7770 isn't going to be appreciably faster than a 4850. At best it'll be 20%-ish faster assuming the CPU isn't a bottleneck, and at worst it's roughly tied. $150 is a lot of money to do basically nothing with.

I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do, I do not do. But what I hate, I do.

A 7770 isn't going to be appreciably faster than a 4850. At best it'll be 20%-ish faster assuming the CPU isn't a bottleneck, and at worst it's roughly tied. $150 is a lot of money to do basically nothing with.

This is truth. 7770 is not a decent upgrade from 4850. 6870 would be a decent upgrade. 560 Ti too. 7850 too. 560-448 or 570 too, if you catch some sales.

You should hit up TR user Airmantharp because I know he's going to be selling his 6950 2GB cards as soon as he gets his new 670 card. Send him a PM telling him you're interested and see if he responds.

A 7770 isn't going to be appreciably faster than a 4850. At best it'll be 20%-ish faster assuming the CPU isn't a bottleneck, and at worst it's roughly tied. $150 is a lot of money to do basically nothing with.

This is truth. 7770 is not a decent upgrade from 4850. 6870 would be a decent upgrade. 560 Ti too. 7850 too. 560-448 or 570 too, if you catch some sales.

You should hit up TR user Airmantharp because I know he's going to be selling his 6950 2GB cards as soon as he gets his new 670 card. Send him a PM telling him you're interested and see if he responds.

Just wasted money since the CPU bottleneck will still be there....

nVidia video drivers FAIL, click for more infoDisclaimer: All answers and suggestions are provided by an enthusiastic amateur and are therefore without warranty either explicit or implicit. Basically you use my suggestions at your own risk.

Well, first, it would be more wasteful to get a 7770 that offers almost nothing over the 4850. Second, CPU bottlenecks vary depending on resolution, graphical settings, and the particular game. It would make a lot more sense to me to get a more powerful card than the CPU can handle than to spend $130 on a graphics card that's essentially not an upgrade; i.e. better to pay $200 for something than $130 for almost nothing. At least then the stage will be set for a meaningful CPU upgrade.

Now, a 560 TI or HD 6950 or HD 7850 are all on roughly the same level as the HD 5870 (the HD 7850 is up to 20% faster, the HD 6950 up to 10% faster, the 560 Ti roughly even) and I'd say that the Q9400 is sometimes going to be a bottleneck, but not always and hardly ever a very significant one for those graphics cards (unless you're gaming at stupidly low resolutions).

Heck, at least get a 6870. That's way better than the 7770, it's less chance of being bottlenecked by the CPU, and it's a meaningful upgrade. But I still think it's not unreasonable to consider the 560 Ti or the HD 7850 or the HD 6950 if you can get a good deal on one.

If he wants to check about a CPU bottleneck right now that Q9400 should run at 3.2Ghz pretty easy. If he does that and the games improve greatly then GPU upgrade isn't going to help much. If the extra clock speed doesn't help the performance in the games of interest then then they are GPU bound and there is no need to worry about the processor right now.

I've seen countless different sites testing all kinds of modern games at low, low resolutions to see if the CPU is a bottleneck.

The simple answer is "no".The in-depth answer is "really, no"The super-nerdy answer is "at unnecessarily low settings where high-end graphics cards are capable of spitting out over 120 frames a second, lower-spec CPU's like an i3 will be slower than an overclocked i7-2600K. Unless you care about unrealistic edge-case testing, even an old Q9400 is capable of hitting decent framerates in CPU-intensive games like Civ5 and Skyrim, so "the answer is still no".

Civ5 is pretty brutal late game, but even a lowly llano can average 45fps with max-cpu settings, and it's hardly a twitch shooter. I bet even a new $200 gpu would struggle to not be the bottleneck there....

Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.

So if he wants to be sure spend the 30 minutes and check it out... Then there is no assuming and he will know what his Dad is shelling out the money for. Or the other option is to search on Google and see if anyone is running a similar configuration out there on those games and see if they like the results from an upgrade of GPU only.

I had an i3-540 for awhile (yeah, last generation), and it was mostly very good. I upgraded to a 2600k and the difference was somewhat noticeable, but probably only because I have a 120 hz monitor and prefer high fps (80+ and constant 120 if I can get it). Personally if I were choosing a cpu now though, I'd probably go with an i5 because more games have 3-4 threads now, and the hyperthreading doesn't do that much for games, generally.

I have a Radeon 4870. Been using it for about three years, maybe more (I think... I bought it not very long after release), and still going pretty well. I have lately been investigating a GPU upgrade. My conclusion was: it's not worth the money! The GPU I could get for $200 *in my opinion* is not worth the actual performance increase. Not after THREE years! A decent upgrade in performance exists out there yes, but I'm not ready to pay $400+ for it. Again, after THREE YEARS, I should be able to get the performance of a $400 card, at the cost of $200.

So I'm still waiting... Obviously, if in x months my 4870 is becoming unplayable even at lower settings, I'll buy whatever I can afford at that time. But then the performance boost will be more appreciable, simply going from unplayable to playable. And while writing this, I'm also realizing that my argument depends largely on the games that are played. If the game is currently unplayable with a 4870 with desirable settings, the yes I would spend $200 if that's the max I could afford.

"The mind is like a parachute: it doesn't work unless it's open"... Frank Zappa

I'm just stirring the mud really (sorry) but I see these two $200 cards:

used 6950 with no warranty

no games

no returns policy

blower

unlockable (I assume this means it's been overclocked and pushed harder than spec)

no shipping included.

and

new 6950 with warranty

free game

returns policy if you're dissatisfied with your purchase

quieter cooler

possibly unlockable, but will your dad care to overclock?

free shipping.

Am I missing something or are you being waaaaaay too optimistic on the resale value of your old graphics card?

Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.

Not really- and I'm not saying my card is for him, either; I just put it out there as an option. Price is always negotiable, of course.

But point by point-Warranty- buy newGames- wash, who plays Dirt 3 again?Return Policy- negotiated of course, better with a retailerBlower- also a wash, and depends on the user- the HD6950's stock blower is quietUnlockable- NOT unlocked, my cards have not been abusedShipping- also negotiable

Again, I'm not knocking the new card- it just depends on what the OP (or anyone else) is looking for.