On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:55:47PM +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
>> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:17:15AM +0100, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Uoti Urpala wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> >
> >> > Since I've already tested that and shown it to work I see little reason
> >> > to do that for all files when it seems unlikely to get included in
> >> > FFmpeg anyway and I have no interest in maintaining a fork.
> >> >
> >>
> >> FYI, I might be reconsidering my interest in it.
> >
> > if theres anything i can do to help you, just say it!
> > i really would like to finally fix the mov demuxer so it conforms to
> > the API in respect to codec_tag
>> What exactly is this API? I can play mov files using lavf demuxer, so
> from my point of view it's not breaking the API at all.
API: codec_tag is the container specific codec identifer
And yes you dont need it to play .mov/.mp4 currently i think.
Its needed for some avis though but ive already said that.
It could be usefull for remuxing mp4->mp4 as well if one wanted to preserve
the object id.
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.
-- Aristotle
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080128/184066e3/attachment.pgp>