NEW YORK JUST PASSED A VERY EXPANSIVE SEALING STATUTE! IT MEANS THAT MANY INDIVIDUALS CAN NOW HAVE TWO MISDEMEANORS OR ONE FELONY PLUS ONE MISDEMEANOR SEALED AFTER TEN YEARS.

After many years of being stalled in the legislative process, New York has finally passed a law allowing for certain criminal records to be sealed after ten years. Two misdemeanors can be sealed or one misdemeanor and one felony can be sealed after just ten years. This means that New York now has one of the most expansive sealing statutes in the nation. This is great news for persons who have been discriminated against in work and education and licensing because of an old and isolated criminal conviction.

Make your criminal record great again!!! Take advantage of New York's brand new criminal conviction sealing law! Call me at 212-786-2999 to learn more.

Here is the complete law as passed by the New York Assembly:

Section 1. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new section 160.59 to read as follows: S 160.59 SEALING OF CERTAIN CONVICTIONS.

1. DEFINITIONS: AS USED IN THIS SECTION, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS;

(A) "ELIGIBLE OFFENSE" SHALL MEAN ANY CRIME DEFINED IN THE LAWS OF THIS STATE OTHER THAN A SEX OFFENSE DEFINED IN ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED THIRTY OF THE PENAL LAW,

AN OFFENSE DEFINED IN ARTICLE TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE OF THE PENAL LAW,

A FELONY OFFENSE DEFINED IN ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW,

A VIOLENT FELONY OFFENSE DEFINED IN SECTION 70.02 OF THE PENAL LAW,

A CLASS A FELONY OFFENSE ,

A FELONY OFFENSE DEFINED IN ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW WHERE THE UNDERLYING OFFENSE IS NOT AN ELIGIBLE OFFENSE,

AN ATTEMPT TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE THAT IS NOT AN ELIGIBLE OFFENSE IF THE ATTEMPT IS A FELONY, OR AN OFFENSE FOR WHICH REGISTRATION AS A SEX OFFENDER IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SIX-C OF THE CORRECTION LAW.

(B) "SENTENCING JUDGE" SHALL MEAN THE JUDGE WHO PRONOUNCED SENTENCE UPON THE CONVICTION UNDER CONSIDERATION, OR IF THAT JUDGE IS NO LONGER SITTING IN A COURT IN THE JURISDICTION IN WHICH THE CONVICTION WAS OBTAINED, ANY OTHER JUDGE WHO IS SITTING IN THE CRIMINAL COURT WHERE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION WAS ENTERED.

2. (A) A DEFENDANT WHO HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF UP TO TWO ELIGIBLE OFFENSES BUT NOT MORE THAN ONE FELONY OFFENSE MAY APPLY TO THE COURT IN WHICH HE OR SHE WAS CONVICTED OF THE MOST SERIOUS OFFENSE TO HAVE SUCH CONVICTION SEALED.

IF ALL OFFENSES ARE OFFENSES WITH THE SAME CLASSI-FICATION, THE APPLICATION SHALL BE MADE TO THE COURT IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT WAS LAST CONVICTED.

(B) AN APPLICATION SHALL CONTAIN:

(I) A COPY OF A CERTIFICATE OF DISPOSITION OR OTHER SIMILAR DOCUMENTATION FOR ANY OFFENSE FOR WHICH THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN CONVICTED, OR AN EXPLANATION OF WHY SUCH CERTIFICATE OR OTHER DOCUMENTATION IS NOT AVAILABLE;

(II) A SWORN STATEMENT OF THE DEFENDANT AS TO WHETHER HE OR SHE HAS FILED, OR THEN INTENDS TO FILE, ANY APPLICATION FOR SEALING OF ANY OTHER ELIGIBLE OFFENSE;

(III) A COPY OF ANY OTHER SUCH APPLICATION THAT HAS BEEN FILED;

(IV) A SWORN STATEMENT AS TO THE CONVICTION OR CONVICTIONS FOR WHICH RELIEF IS BEING SOUGHT; AND (V) A SWORN STATEMENT OF THE REASON OR REASONS WHY THE COURT SHOULD, IN ITS DISCRETION, GRANT SUCH SEALING, ALONG WITH ANY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION.

(C) A COPY OF ANY APPLICATION FOR SUCH SEALING SHALL BE SERVED UPON THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE CONVICTION, OR, IF MORE THAN ONE, THE CONVICTIONS, WAS OR WERE OBTAINED. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHALL NOTIFY THE COURT WITHIN FORTY-FIVE DAYS IF HE OR SHE OBJECTS TO THE APPLICATION FOR SEALING.

(D) WHEN SUCH APPLICATION IS FILED WITH THE COURT, IT SHALL BE ASSIGNED TO THE SENTENCING JUDGE UNLESS MORE THAN ONE APPLICATION IS FILED IN WHICH CASE THE APPLICATION SHALL BE ASSIGNED TO THE COUNTY COURT OR THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE CRIMINAL COURT IS LOCATED, WHO SHALL REQUEST AND RECEIVE FROM THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES A FINGERPRINT BASED CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORD OF THE DEFENDANT, INCLUDING ANY SEALED OR SUPPRESSED RECORDS. THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES ALSO SHALL INCLUDE A CRIMINAL HISTORY REPORT, IF ANY, FROM THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION REGARDING ANY CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION THAT OCCURRED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS. THE DIVISION IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE SUCH INFORMATION FROM THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOR THIS PURPOSE, AND TO MAKE SUCH INFORMATION AVAIL- ABLE TO THE COURT, WHICH MAY MAKE THIS INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND THE DEFENDANT.

3. THE SENTENCING JUDGE, OR COUNTY OR SUPREME COURT SHALL SUMMARILY DENY THE DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION WHEN:

(A) THE DEFENDANT IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SIX-C OF THE CORRECTION LAW; OR

(B) THE DEFENDANT HAS PREVIOUSLY OBTAINED SEALING OF THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CONVICTIONS ALLOWABLE UNDER SECTION 160.58 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW; OR

(C) THE DEFENDANT HAS PREVIOUSLY OBTAINED SEALING OF THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CONVICTIONS ALLOWABLE UNDER SUBDIVISION FOUR OF THIS SECTION; OR A. 10710 3

(D) THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED IN SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS SECTION HAS NOT YET BEEN SATISFIED; OR

(E) THE DEFENDANT HAS AN UNDISPOSED ARREST OR CHARGE PENDING; OR

(F) THE DEFENDANT WAS CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME AFTER THE DATE OF THE IMPOSITION OF THE SENTENCE ON THE DEFENDANT'S LATEST CONVICTION FOR WHICH SEALING IS SOUGHT; OR (G) THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THE REQUIRED SWORN STATEMENT OF THE REASONS WHY THE COURT SHOULD GRANT THE RELIEF REQUESTED; OR

(H) THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF TWO OR MORE FELONIES OR MORE THAN TWO CRIMES.

4. PROVIDED THAT THE APPLICATION IS NOT SUMMARILY DENIED FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION, A DEFENDANT WHO STANDS CONVICTED OF UP TO TWO ELIGIBLE OFFENSES, MAY OBTAIN SEALING OF NO MORE THAN TWO ELIGIBLE OFFENSES BUT NOT MORE THAN ONE FELONY OFFENSE.

5. ANY ELIGIBLE OFFENSE MAY BE SEALED ONLY AFTER AT LEAST TEN YEARS HAVE PASSED SINCE THE IMPOSITION OF THE SENTENCE ON THE DEFENDANT'S LATEST CONVICTION, OR, IF THE DEFENDANT WAS SENTENCED TO A PERIOD OF INCARCERATION, INCLUDING A PERIOD OF INCARCERATION IMPOSED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SENTENCE OF PROBATION, THE DEFENDANT'S LATEST RELEASE FROM INCARCERATION. IN CALCULATING THE TEN YEAR PERIOD UNDER THIS SUBDIVI- SION, ANY PERIOD OF TIME THE DEFENDANT SPENT INCARCERATED AFTER THE CONVICTION FOR WHICH THE APPLICATION FOR SEALING IS SOUGHT, SHALL BE EXCLUDED AND SUCH TEN YEAR PERIOD SHALL BE EXTENDED BY A PERIOD OR PERI ODS EQUAL TO THE TIME SERVED UNDER SUCH INCARCERATION.

6. UPON DETERMINING THAT THE APPLICATION IS NOT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY DENIAL PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION AND THAT THE APPLI- CATION IS OPPOSED BY THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, THE SENTENCING JUDGE OR COUNTY OR SUPREME COURT SHALL CONDUCT A HEARING ON THE APPLICATION IN ORDER TO CONSIDER ANY EVIDENCE OFFERED BY EITHER PARTY THAT WOULD AID THE SENTENCING JUDGE IN HIS OR HER DECISION WHETHER TO SEAL THE RECORDS OF THE DEFENDANT'S CONVICTIONS. NO HEARING IS REQUIRED IF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY DOES NOT OPPOSE THE APPLICATION, HOWEVER THE COURT MAY HOLD A HEARING AT ITS DISCRETION.

7. IN CONSIDERING ANY SUCH APPLICATION, THE SENTENCING JUDGE OR COUNTY OR SUPREME COURT SHALL CONSIDER ANY RELEVANT FACTORS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:

(A) THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT HAS ELAPSED SINCE THE DEFENDANT'S LAST CONVICTION;

(B) THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH THE DEFENDANT IS SEEKING RELIEF, INCLUDING WHETHER THE ARREST CHARGE WAS NOT AN ELIGIBLE OFFENSE;

(C) THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND SERIOUSNESS OF ANY OTHER OFFENSES FOR WHICH THE DEFENDANT STANDS CONVICTED;

(D) THE CHARACTER OF THE DEFENDANT, INCLUDING ANY MEASURES THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS TAKEN TOWARD REHABILITATION, SUCH AS PARTICIPATING IN TREATMENT PROGRAMS, WORK, OR SCHOOLING, AND PARTICIPATING IN COMMUNITY SERVICE OR OTHER VOLUNTEER PROGRAMS;

(E) ANY STATEMENTS MADE BY THE VICTIM OF THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH THE DEFENDANT IS SEEKING RELIEF;

(F) THE IMPACT OF SEALING THE DEFENDANT'S RECORD UPON HIS OR HER REHABILITATION AND UPON HIS OR HER SUCCESSFUL AND PRODUCTIVE REENTRY AND REINTEGRATION INTO SOCIETY; AND

(G) THE IMPACT OF SEALING THE DEFENDANT'S RECORD ON PUBLIC SAFETY AND UPON THE PUBLIC'S CONFIDENCE IN AND RESPECT FOR THE LAW. A. 10710 4

8. WHEN A SENTENCING JUDGE OR COUNTY OR SUPREME COURT ORDERS SEALING PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, ALL OFFICIAL RECORDS AND PAPERS RELATING TO THE ARRESTS, PROSECUTIONS, AND CONVICTIONS, INCLUDING ALL DUPLICATES AND COPIES THEREOF, ON FILE WITH THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OR ANY COURT SHALL BE SEALED AND NOT MADE AVAILABLE TO ANY PERSON OR PUBLIC OR PRIVATE AGENCY EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR IN SUBDIVISION NINE OF THIS SECTION; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THE DIVISION SHALL RETAIN ANY FINGER- PRINTS, PALMPRINTS AND PHOTOGRAPHS, OR DIGITAL IMAGES OF THE SAME. THE CLERK OF SUCH COURT SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES REGARDING THE RECORDS THAT SHALL BE SEALED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION. THE CLERK ALSO SHALL NOTIFY ANY COURT IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT HAS STATED, PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (B) OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION, THAT HE OR SHE HAS FILED OR INTENDS TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR SEALING OF ANY OTHER ELIGIBLE OFFENSE.

9. RECORDS SEALED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO:

(A) THE DEFENDANT OR THE DEFENDANT'S DESIGNATED AGENT; OR

(B) QUALIFIED AGENCIES, AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION NINE OF SECTION EIGHT HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE OF THE EXECUTIVE LAW, AND FEDERAL AND STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, WHEN ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THEIR LAW ENFORCEMENT DUTIES; OR

(C) ANY STATE OR LOCAL OFFICER OR AGENCY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSES TO POSSESS GUNS, WHEN THE PERSON HAS MADE APPLICATION FOR SUCH A LICENSE; OR (D) ANY PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYER OF A POLICE OFFICER OR PEACE OFFICER AS THOSE TERMS ARE DEFINED IN SUBDIVISIONS THIRTY-THREE AND THIRTY-FOUR OF SECTION 1.20 OF THIS CHAPTER, IN RELATION TO AN APPLICATION FOR EMPLOY-MENT AS A POLICE OFFICER OR PEACE OFFICER; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT EVERY PERSON WHO IS AN APPLICANT FOR THE POSITION OF POLICE OFFICER OR PEACE OFFICER SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH A COPY OF ALL RECORDS OBTAINED UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH AND AFFORDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE AN EXPLANATION THERE- TO; OR (E) THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FOR THE PURPOSES OF RESPONDING TO QUERIES TO THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM REGARDING ATTEMPTS TO PURCHASE OR OTHERWISE TAKE POSSESSION OF FIREARMS, AS DEFINED IN 18 USC 921(A)(3).

10. A CONVICTION WHICH IS SEALED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE DEFINITION OF A CONVICTION FOR THE PURPOSES OF ANY CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IN WHICH THE FACT OF A PRIOR CONVICTION WOULD ENHANCE A PENALTY OR IS AN ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE CHARGED.

11. NO DEFENDANT SHALL BE REQUIRED OR PERMITTED TO WAIVE ELIGIBILITY FOR SEALING PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AS PART OF A PLEA OF GUILTY, SENTENCE OR ANY AGREEMENT RELATED TO A CONVICTION FOR AN ELIGIBLE OFFENSE AND ANY SUCH WAIVER SHALL BE DEEMED VOID AND WHOLLY ENFORCEABLE. S 2.

Remember that CPL 160.59 requires a ten year waiting period before the conviction can be sealed. So, in the meantime, what records can be sealed in New York before the ten year period has run?

Prior to the ten year period running, a record of a criminal conviction, which is any misdemeanor or felony except a youthful offender adjudication, cannot be sealed and is considered a public record available to anyone through the OCA website for a $55 fee. It does not matter if the person had the charge reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor or only received probation. There are no exceptions to the rule.

In New York, the only records that get completely sealed outside of the provisions of CPL 160.59 (pursuant to CPL 160.50) are cases that result in complete dismissals including:

ACD's and other forms of dismissals and acquittals. whenever a case is fully dismissed either through an ACD an acquittal after trial or if the case is dismissal in the interests of justice for dismissed for facial insufficiency..whatever the reason for the dismissal... these get the full sealing treatment of CPL 160.50. On the other hand, charges that are reduced from a misdemeanor or felony to a violation or infraction get the partial seal treatment of CPL 160.55.

I

How does sealing of a New York Record differ between CPL 160.59 and CPL 160.50 and CPL 160.55?

A Sealing under CPL 160.59 occurs upon application of a person with two or less criminal convictions and no more than one felony conviction (that are at least ten years old) pursuant to the process outlined above. A sealing under 160.50 occurs in New York when a criminal charge is dismissed completely, while a sealing under 160.55 occurs when a criminal charge is reduced from a misdemeanor or felony to a violation or infraction.

A sealing under CPL 160.50 is the most favorable of the three since the 160.50 sealing mandates destruction of the arrest record and the sealing of the court file. A sealing under 160.55 is not as comprehensive as the 160.50 sealing. The 160.55 sealing occurs when someone is arrested or charged with a criminal offense, but is ultimately convicted of a violation or infraction, the sealing of the arrest records is accomplished pursuant to CPL 160.55 (1) (c), which means that records of the arrest, such as mugshots, arrest reports and fingerprints are destroyed but the Court file stays open.

The CPL 160.59 is a hybrid of the 160.50 and the 160.55 as is allows for the court file to be sealed but the arrest records remain unsealed.

​

Sealing Criminal Court Records in New York under CPL 160.50 and 160.55