SUBSCRIBE:

President Obama signs law blocking "libel tourism" in US courts

Share

President Barack Obama recently signed new legislation that will protect journalists, authors and publishers from becoming victims of defamation lawsuits filed in countries with harsh libel laws that discourage critical media, reports Freedom House. The practice of filing libel lawsuits in foreign countries with weak libel protections is called "libel tourism." Countries like England continue to permit this practice with foreign plaintiffs bringing libel actions against foreign defendants in British courts, regardless of where the alleged offense occurred.

"Libel tourism" is used by wealthy individuals and high-profile public figures to quash accusations of wrongdoing. The legislation signed by President Obama bars US federal courts from recognising judgements from foreign courts that are not in accordance with US constitutional protections for free expression.

England is popular with foreign claimants because in British law the defendant carries the burden of proof, suggesting that the reputation of the claimant is more important than the free speech of the defendant. Brazil, Australia, Indonesia and Singapore have also been noted as having weak protections for journalists, researchers and publishers.

"Regardless of the final outcome in courts, the high financial burden generated by 'libel tourism' lawsuits presents a dangerous disincentive for exposing wrongdoing by government officials, businesspersons and private citizens," said Freedom House.

More from United States

Americans witnessed several major cyberattacks in the latter half of 2016, including the hacking and subsequent leaking of sensitive information from the Democratic National Committee in the lead up to the vote

The report examines the rise of fraudulent news, defined here as demonstrably false information that is being presented as a factual news report with the intention to deceive the public, and the related erosion of public faith in traditional journalism. The report identifies proposed solutions at the intersection of technology, journalism, and civil society to empower news consumers with better skills and tools to help them process the torrents of information they see online.

Political polarization in the media worsened during the presidential campaign, due in part to the emergence of “alt-right” news sites that disseminated highly nationalistic or nativist messages, conspiracy theories, and at times false or propagandistic coverage.

Which companies stand with their users, embracing transparency around government data requests? Which companies have resisted improper government demands by fighting for user privacy in the courts and on Capitol Hill? In short, which companies have your back?

"Congressional efforts in 2012 to adopt legislation to prevent copyright infringement on the Internet were shelved in response to strong opposition from leading Internet companies, websites, and ordinary users"

IFEX publishes original and member-produced free expression news and reports. Some member content has been edited by IFEX. We invite you to contact [email protected] to request permission to reproduce or republish in whole or in part content from this site.