Comments on: You make the call: Dan Cleary's reviewed goal against Anaheimhttp://nhl.nbcsports.com/2010/10/09/you-make-the-call-dan-clearys-reviewed-goal-against-anaheim/
ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.comFri, 09 Dec 2016 15:40:43 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/By: Alexhttp://nhl.nbcsports.com/2010/10/09/you-make-the-call-dan-clearys-reviewed-goal-against-anaheim/comment-page-1/#comment-6869
Sat, 09 Oct 2010 12:40:43 +0000http://localhost/wp/3.0/?p=15724#comment-6869Technically yes it should be a goal, puck went in before the net came off … but what opportunity did Hiller have? Is he going to tackle Cleary and smother the player AND puck?
Yes it is by rule a goal, no they shouldn’t go back to the ridiculous “no part of offensive player in crease” nonsense but isn’t there something in between that can a) protect the goalie b) give the goalie a chance to make the save c) allow “gritty” goals around the crease to be legal?
]]>By: Blitzburgh Brianhttp://nhl.nbcsports.com/2010/10/09/you-make-the-call-dan-clearys-reviewed-goal-against-anaheim/comment-page-1/#comment-6868
Sat, 09 Oct 2010 11:57:05 +0000http://localhost/wp/3.0/?p=15724#comment-6868Well, since the NHL hates the Red Wings and consistently calls things against them unfairly, this was ruled no goal. Wait, what?
Seriously though, I don’t know how that goal technically works under the letter of the law but I think we all saw that it was going in and the net bouncing off wouldn’t have affected it. Should be a goal. Right call in spirit.
]]>By: Garryhttp://nhl.nbcsports.com/2010/10/09/you-make-the-call-dan-clearys-reviewed-goal-against-anaheim/comment-page-1/#comment-6867
Sat, 09 Oct 2010 11:41:14 +0000http://localhost/wp/3.0/?p=15724#comment-6867Clearly, Cleary put the puck in the net before he bumped into a queen size mattress covered Hiller.
]]>