Headlines

Fred Kaplan

John Kerry isn’t right for the Pentagon

No question: Kerry deserves to be the next secretary of state. (Clinton, who looks exhausted, has said repeatedly she won’t stay for a second term.) First, as longtime chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry knows the issues cold. Second, in his first term, Obama called on Kerry many times to serve as de facto envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, and he did well, persuading Afghan president Hamid Karzai to hold elections and smoothing over tensions with Pakistani officials (in the days when there was still something to smooth). Third, Obama owes Kerry something. It was Kerry who chose Obama to give the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic Convention, the address that catapulted him from Illinois state senator to superstar. Kerry asked for the job of chief diplomat after Obama was elected in 2008; when Clinton was picked instead (a move that stunned him), he settled back into his job and, among other things, did yeoman’s work steering Obama’s New START nuclear arms treaty through the Senate—no easy task, since ratification required a two-thirds majority. …

If Rice does get the job, is it a good idea to send Kerry to the Pentagon instead? Probably not. Some of his former aides, who otherwise admire him, complain of his incompetence at running a Senate committee staff, much less a gigantic executive-branch department. He has never been known for crisp decisiveness. A secretary of state can get away with these shortcomings and still do well, as the main job is to serve as the president’s adviser and envoy to the world. A secretary of defense has to do that while also shaping a half-trillion-dollar budget and imposing coherent civilian authority on the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a far flung military bureaucracy.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

…which is exactly why Obama wants him for that role. Seriously, whoever really is “right” for the Pentagon, do we really believe he would be “right” for Obama? No way. The lefties have reviled the military ever since Vietnam. You think Obama is any different?

Kerry would not only be incompetent in that job, but also his appointment would be a devastating slap in the face of our military. Obama cannot help but recognize this, so if Kerry gets the appointment, we’ll know Obama’s intentions are to demoralize the Armed Services.

Lurch as Sec Def? No way, the guy doesn’t even respect the military. He’s never been in charge of anything that requires real decision making something that office requires. Having said that, he’s a lock. Senators are notorious for being easy on each other, that’ll be the case at his confirmation. We’re screwed….

Wasn’t John Kerry the one who faked reports to get medals, threw fake medals over a fence to rile up a leftist audience, and who asserted in his Senate testimony in 1971:

“Vietnam veterans had “personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephone to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam…”

We need somebody who’s sane and who can be respected by our troops leading our military: Kerry doesn’t qualify!!!