It appears to me that you have attracted a significant number of people, who are - in Douglas Harding's words - already awake to, or awakening to the first person singular present tensewhich is the LOVE that makes the world go round and leaves no-one whatever out - all travelling the way - and willing to communicate and collaborate with each-other - regardless of race, religion, politics or culture.

That quotation of Margaret Mead - the distinguished American anthropologist, intellectual and scientist -obviously sets the scene for your initiative but it is very clear that you have already sown "the seed" which will establish a mechanism by which the ‘few' can become the ‘many'.

There is absolutely no reason why you should not further establish a large enough core of "those that understand - because no explanation is necessary" - who, through example, will be able to & perhaps finally convince "those that don't understand - for whom hitherto no explanation would suffice" - such that they to would join the ranks of those that understand and in so doing -

This morning I've been reading some of your posts (i'm not sure how i got there, doing my usual float i suppose, when my mind is in the search), and i'm amazed and impressed with your thoughts & your words. Your very wise & I thank you for being here and posting. I've been looking for some inspiration in the last week or so, to continue my quest. (lifes drudgery has me moving in waves). You've got me thinking on language & thought & i'm hoping i'll have a new post soon. I felt compelled to leave you a comment & beg for more of your thoughts. :) You have a great contribution here & i look forward to reading more.

And its the entrepreneurial impulse behind it too. Consciouss capitalism.

Conscious business.

Evolutonary Entrepreneeurship.

In this year, and the coming years politics, economy and crisis mangement of all kind have to be adressed too.

How can this community contribute, co-shape and catalyse big constellations even beyond its own holonic systemics?

How can it contribute to global leadership? Beyond the dominant impulses from institutions, organizations, foundations and think tanks? Beyond the dominant corporate agendas and corridors of power in poltics?

"EVOLUTIONARY is a play on the word "REVOLUTIONARY", and I mean it to convey something of the revolutionary nature of evolution as an idea. Evolutionaries are revolutionaries, with all the personal and philosophical commitment that word implies. They are not merely curious bystanders to the evolutionary process, passive believers in the established sciences of evolution, though all certainly value those insights. They are committed activists and advocates - often passionate ones - for the importance of evolution at a cultural level."

TheMINDFULNESSMind Map provides a matrixof 49 "tunnels" - designed for and by the masses - allowing access to a place conducive to Coexistence, Cooperation and Collaboration - such that the collective all-inclusive first person singular present tense, third person objective - point of view - will then lead to the establishment of a new model & method of wealth creation, mutually beneficial to ALL.

So now, the Society for General Systems Research, which is proliferating, is proliferating by the standard methods that are used in this country - regional chapters. I said to Dick Erickson, ‘I don’t think we should be so conventional, we ought to think of something better.’ We can’t get anybody to use any kind of constructive thinking on the problems of organization. And, of course, there’s no place where you can get a well rounded degree in General System Theory. Rand has a school that is almost entirely military.

One of the most crazy situations - I was asked to speak at a dinner of the Air Force celebrating their fifth decade of Air Force intelligence. I talked about the fact that they weren’t paying attention to the whole; the Air Force was modeling the Soviet Union as a system, and the Army was modeling the United States as a system, using different units, and they were both ignoring the fact that China existed, and therefore were making hopeless mess when you knew you had a universe to deal with. What I was telling them was to use cybernetic thinking as it had developed into general systems theory. The next morning I was on a chartered plane bringing me back, and there was a man on it who said, ‘You left me way behind. I couldn’t understand a word you said.’ I said, ‘What are you?’ He said, ‘I’m an electronic specialist.’

Americans are always solving problems piece-meal. They’re always solving them de nouveau and artificially because they’re all newcomers and they don’t have decisions grounded in a culture.

Margaret Mead talking about Cybernetics in the context of inside versus outside the box from Issue no. 10 of the CoEvolutionary Quarterly, June 1976.