Panda Smart Browsers are running on Windows Computers with .NET Framework, from your Home computer, from your Work computer, from VPS etc.

Click to expand...

Thanks. Do you still seeing it's rising google? I know it used to but i guess many users running it on VPS to work 24H and credit earn so will that be a bad sign? Do you see any improvements after sending traffic?

Thanks. Do you still seeing it's rising google? I know it used to but i guess many users running it on VPS to work 24H and credit earn so will that be a bad sign? Do you see any improvements after sending traffic?

Click to expand...

We do allow traffic from Windows Computers with .NET Framework, from your Home computer, from your Work computer, from VPS etc. from the beginning of the system, so our members always benefits of ranking improvements.

Hey, I started up a blog recently to provide SEO case studies. I thought I'd run some experiments with Pandabot to see if the artificial traffic could influence YouTube SERPs. So far, in over a dozen experiments, I've yet to see any positive SERP increases directly attributable to Pandabot. I'm not writing the tool off by any means, there are still dozens of approaches / campaign variations / traffic types & volumes I've yet to experiment with. So far however, the results do not look promising.

Having looked into things further. It appears many of the views are not being registered on YouTube. In one case study... campaign setup 10 views per day > Start date: 19th of June, a total of 215 views have been sent by Pandabot. However, according you YouTube, the video analytics shows there to be 96 views in total. 59 of which are definitely from Pandabot, the other 37 are natural views from YouTube. So only a quarter of the views sent by Pandabot were being registered on YouTube.

This may look disparaging so far, but I will continue with various experiments and let everybody know my findings. If anybody wants to see proof of my results, PM me as I don't think I can leave a link to my blog here?

MosesW

In the interests of fairness and making sure I'm not misrepresenting Pandabot with poorly setup campaigns / experiments. I would welcome any guidance as I do still think this tool has potential. If you'd be willing to help steer me in the right direction, I will of course document and publish the positive research too, which you're free to cite after.

Hey, I started up a blog recently to provide SEO case studies. I thought I'd run some experiments with Pandabot to see if the artificial traffic could influence YouTube SERPs. So far, in over a dozen experiments, I've yet to see any positive SERP increases directly attributable to Pandabot. I'm not writing the tool off by any means, there are still dozens of approaches / campaign variations / traffic types & volumes I've yet to experiment with. So far however, the results do not look promising.

Having looked into things further. It appears many of the views are not being registered on YouTube. In one case study... campaign setup 10 views per day > Start date: 19th of June, a total of 215 views have been sent by Pandabot. However, according you YouTube, the video analytics shows there to be 96 views in total. 59 of which are definitely from Pandabot, the other 37 are natural views from YouTube. So only a quarter of the views sent by Pandabot were being registered on YouTube.

This may look disparaging so far, but I will continue with various experiments and let everybody know my findings. If anybody wants to see proof of my results, PM me as I don't think I can leave a link to my blog here?

MosesW

In the interests of fairness and making sure I'm not misrepresenting Pandabot with poorly setup campaigns / experiments. I would welcome any guidance as I do still think this tool has potential. If you'd be willing to help steer me in the right direction, I will of course document and publish the positive research too, which you're free to cite after.

Click to expand...

Let us say your YouTube video length is 10:00 Minutes.

And you have set the Traffic Campaigns Average View Duration 05:00 Minutes.

We dont know the exact rules of YouTube counter, but I suggest that set the Average View Duration at least as low as your video length.

All experiments have the view duration set as close as possible to the total length of time of the video. Along with 15% variable watch time. Although TBH, being able to set the exact time of the video along with a variable watch time would be far better.

So if video length is 10 minutes long.
Variable watch time 50 - 100%
Pandabots will watch the video for between 5 to 10 minutes

Then you'd only need to setup a single campaign, instead of setting up one campaign for maximum watch time and another for lower watch time. It would also save wasted time watching the video after it finished if you set a 15% watch time variation on view duration close to the total duration of the video.

Update

Regardless of the above, I have seen some positive SERP increases from campaigns, so I'm sifting through the data now and checking whether it can be attributed to Pandabot. You can see my findings via my homepage link once I'm done.

I do think if the above were implemented, it would make the views look much more natural if nothing else and may even potentially help more of them stick. Unless YouTube are simply filtering out views based on IP, but I don't know what YouTube takes into account when it comes to the view counter.

Edit*

Also, on all of the campaigns I've checked so far with views from organic traffic via Google.com, almost all of them show similar results

Unfortunately, YouTube no longer provide the search terms, so I can't say for sure if this is the traffic I've sent from Pandabot. However, that means either none of the traffic from Pandabot via Google organic search is registered at all, some of it is being registered and for some reason it's bugging out and only counting as a few seconds watch-time OR for some reason it's being mistakenly registered as direct traffic, which seems unlikely.

This could be a potential bug, but I will set up some tests to confirm this for certain.

What is included in the $19.99 per month subscription? I looked around and couldn't find any clear details about what the upgrade does for you. I want to upgrade ASAP but I'd like to know the benefits first. Thanks!

What is included in the $19.99 per month subscription? I looked around and couldn't find any clear details about what the upgrade does for you. I want to upgrade ASAP but I'd like to know the benefits first. Thanks!

Note that adblockers might block our captcha, and other functionality on BHW so if you don't see the captcha or see reduced functionality please disable adblockers to ensure full functionality, note we only allow relevant management verified ads on BHW.