Friday, March 17, 2017

Dylan Beyer, CNN: Sean Hannity Pulls Gun on Juan Williams

Sean Hannity showed Juan Williams his personal carry firearm.

CNN has reported that Hannity threatened Williams with a gun after a heated exchange.

What happened?

Listen to the language to know the truth. Is Dylan Byers deceptive?If he is deceptive, the language should guide us. If he has been misled by witnesses, his language will show no sensitivity indicators. In order to deceive, intention for deception must exist.

Dylan Byers, one of the media writers at CNN who works for media industry defender Brian Stelter, printed a story on Thursday alleging:

“Last year, after ending one of his many spirited on-air arguments with liberal contributor Juan Williams, Hannity pulled out a gun and pointed it directly at Williams.” Byers cited “three sources with knowledge of the incident” to make the claim.

1. Note the number of "sources" as "three." If one is being deceptive and must fabricate a number between 1 and 9, statistically, he is likely to choose 3. We have seen this repeatedly in cases where "3 men broke in" (Charlie Rogers) and "just had 3 boats shooting at us" (Tiffany Hartley's deception about Falcon Lake)

2. Note that the three are "sources" and not "witnesses" or "eye witnesses." This is a subtle point of distance.

3. Note the word "with" puts distance between the "three" and "knowledge."

4. It is "knowledge of the incident" Sean Hannity responded with what happened. We look for the pronoun "I" and past tense verbs for commitment. The key for understanding here is the use of pronouns. Not only must we see him commit by "putting himself, psychologically into the statement" but it will reveal his relationship to Williams. Given the context of "heated argument", this is vital.

“While discussing the issue of firearms, Ishowedmy good friend Juan Williams my unloaded firearm in a professional and safe manner for educational purposes only. Every precautionary procedure that I have been trained in since the age of 11 was followed. I’ve had a conceal carry permit in five states for all of my adult life. Any other interpretation of this is outright false reporting.”1. We note consistent use of the pronoun "I"2. We note the complete social introduction of Williams indicating a good relationship. This has three elements:a. nameb. titlec. possessive pronounTo Hannity, Williams is "my" (+) and "friend", (title, +) with his name. (+) d. "good" is unnecessary, making it sensitive. This is a need to persuade (-) and a negative, in spite of context. The need to emphasize safety precaution is contextual. Note that handling a gun since age "11" means muscle memory of routine. Those with concealed carry permits follow these steps so often that it is without thought. That it has been since age 11, and Hannity is 55 years old, the muscle memory is instinctive. In fact, to alter this procedure would cause disruption and likely pause in the language. There is an overall need to persuade in the statement, which is seen in light of the context of CNN's hostility towards Sean Hannity, his news program, and his support of President Trump. This cannot be ignored because it will influence the language. But what about the "victim" here? What does his language tell us?

Juan Williams

“This incident is being sensationalized — everything was under total control throughout and I never felt like I was put in harm’s way,” Williams said, according to the CNN report. This is an unreliable denial with the emphasis on "total" and "never." "Total" may be in reaction to the CNN report and "never" does not address the specific incident. That which is unreliable is not considered deceptive but is simply put in the category of unreliable meaning, more information is needed. "I was put" is in passive voice, showing a sense of lack of control. This is a point where Williams should be asked if, at the time of the incident, if he carried a weapon or was familiar with a weapon. It may be that Williams was, in fact, uncomfortable, even with a side arm demonstration. As they differ strongly in issues, the right to bear arms may be one of them. This statement may indicate a level of discomfort for Williams. We still need more information: “It was clear that Sean put my safety and security above all else and we continue to be great friends.”Pronouns do not lie. They are instinctive and even in carefully chosen statements, tweets, emails, etc, the choice of pronoun is always noted. "my safety" shows that Williams is taking ownership of safety, as he ascribes this to "Sean" (first name, casual), which tells us that Williams, even if he dislikes guns, did not feel in danger. But it is the next pronoun that brings us to finality:"...we continue to be great friends."Even with "great" over "good", the pronoun "we" indicates unity and cooperation. When we find someone needing to persuade of a "great friendship", we find the absence of this unifying pronoun, Analysis Conclusion:The weakness and distancing language in the article by Dylan Beyer tells us:Beyer was deceptively writing in an attempt to discredit Sean Hannity. It is "fake news."The statements by Hannity and Williams reveals that Hannity did not threaten nor endanger Williams while showing him his side arm. For training in deception detection: www.hyattanalysis.com for at home training, seminars and live, ongoing monthly training. Tuition payment plans available for Law Enforcement Officials.

43 comments:

Anonymous
said...

Thank you for this short lesson. Sean Hannity is a bright spot in my mind from my 10 years on Long Island. My children were born in West Islip, and although we moved off the Island for better property prices (I needed some SPACE) years ago, I always smile when I think of Hannity and West Islip.

The slight distancing language in Williams' statements seemed to indicate the incident (whatever it was) made him uncomfortable, but he nevertheless did not view it as "threatening" or menacing. He seems to have taken it in stride, even if it was slightly uncomfortable. "We continue to be great friends" indicates there is something about his incident that, for Williams at least, gave him pause to consider that friendship. After than pause, he got over whatever that issue was, and reaffirmed their friendship. Otherwise, he would have a had no need to bring attention to the "continuation" of that friendship; he would have only have needed to say "We are great friends". I agree this is a fake news story and much-ado about nothing, but I also think this incident got under Williams' skin a little more than he's willing to admit.

It would be rather fun, to see how it would break down, IF the conversation was between Sean Hannity and one of the more "lippy" CNN personalities... Juan is such an irritating presence to quite a few of the humans types, i'm sure he'd feel a bit of animosity, if shown a weapon by most of the conservative hosts on Fox. The phrase "analysis deceptive" used in same sentence as CNN is funny. (humble opinion of course)

In regards to the double murder of the Delphi girls, police have arrested the property owner of where the girls were found on an unrelated charge. They then executed their 2nd search warrant of his property, home, and vehicles, towing away a white truck. Police released a statement saying they were there searching to either eliminate him completely, or to move him higher up on the suspect list.

I have cobbled together all the known on -air interview with the "suspect"

Oh hundreds of cars and , and vehicles, and, trucks, those generator trucks that keep the lights going and all that sorta things were here by the dozens.

Who woulda thought they’d let their children out to do something special that day, take a trip down in that and turn out a disaster like this.

People walk up and down, their, their children an, yeah, it’s quite a nice little trail and the bridge…

The area that they were in is very hard to get to, I mean, you, you can’t get there unless you walk there. I mean, so, somebody had to be walking with them or something.

Never in your wildest dreams you think , he comes down here to play, he won’t come back home.

Yeah, I was not home during the, the time all this was happening, I was in Lafayette and I didn't get home until approximately 6:30 in the evening and then the neighbors stopped asked for permission to look back here for the girls,” he said.

Who’d ever think someone’d be murdered in your backyard. I don’t even recall any homicides in Delphi, uh, I, I, just don’t recall any. But a double homicide, this is a first as far as I know. This is crazy. It’s just terrible, you don’t, I just can’t imagine. My son, when he was kid, he and his buddies played in here for, all the time. I mean he’s, he was born here. That was a different time though.

Who is safe? Here, or anywhere else anymore. You just cannot believe this terrible thing, that happened to the community and the families actually happened here on my property. In my backyard

Interviewer: What do you hear on the tape of the voice?

Logan: Nothing that I recognize at all. N, no one, I, I don’t a , I don’t recognize the voice at all. The pictures of such poor quality, it doesn’t look like anyone I’ve ever seen.

I: What was it like knowing the girls were found on your property?

Logan: That was like being hit with a bolt of lightening, on my property, I, I , you, *sigh*, I mean, you just can’t put words to it.

Theres nothing suspicious in his statements. The really odd statements are from sheriff and grandparent. But, who knows what anyone of us would say if in similar tragic situation. Psychologically and mentally disoriented? from shock, anger, fear, despair, regret? Why are details of this serious case being kept quiet? The community could be in danger. But, hey, multi millionaire Sean Hannity was fibbed about. Oh, brother!!

Anonymous said...Thank you for this short lesson. Sean Hannity is a bright spot in my mind from my 10 years on Long Island. My children were born in West Islip, and although we moved off the Island for better property prices (I needed some SPACE) years ago, I always smile when I think of Hannity and West Islip.March 17, 2017 at 3:17 PM

I know Sean from high school. He was a fun and good kid; liked by everyone. He's had to fight and claw his way to the top and now there, he is the target of this vicious new pre-civil war that is being urged upon us by Obama and his followers.

It is fascinating to watch history unfold, though it is also frightening.

The War Between the States was not a civil war, but one in which sovereign states declared their independence and coercion was used to bring them back under what was, originally, a voluntary union. We saw hints of this just prior to Brexit vote when veiled military and economic threats were made to coerce voters.

Today, the hatred and willingness of the left, fueled by illogic and moral narcissism has the religious zealotry of Islam without "allah" or "mohammad."

The call to violence is unmistakable. Statement Analysis readers know why Loretta Lynch used the words she did.

I hope to post an article about ideology and analysis.

The lying of media is reminiscent of the Third Reich's "ministry of propaganda."

Take a look at the face reaction in this video. Listen to logic versus "virtue signaling" and know the damage and betrayal the left has done to blacks.

Maybe theres no correlation, just coincidence. The rise of neo con news and its liberal counterpart and our country's degradation and deterioration at full speed. Billions in salaries for tv news & talk radio but no improvement to society.

Anonymous Anonymous said...Theres nothing suspicious in his statements. The really odd statements are from sheriff and grandparent. But, who knows what anyone of us would say if in similar tragic situation. Psychologically and mentally disoriented? from shock, anger, fear, despair, regret? Why are details of this serious case being kept quiet? The community could be in danger. But, hey, multi millionaire Sean Hannity was fibbed about. Oh, brother!!

_____________________

I didn't say there was anything odd. I just transcribed the interviews out there of him because his home and property have been searched twice and he has had a vehicle removed during that search. Police consider him a person of interest.

Thank you Lynda for doing so. Did not infer you said there was anything odd. Just my observation. Very weird circumstances & is the community and local news asking for details? Parents should be very concerned.

WaPo in todays news.Two Rockville High students arrested for allegedly raping classmate at school. An 18 and 17 year old in the NINTH GRADE!!!!!!!!!Police arrested two ninth-graders, Henry E. Sanchez, 18, and Jose O. Montano, 17, who appeared in court Friday and were ordered held without bond.

Anonymous Anonymous said...OMG.....Obama Met with Judge at Restaurant, Then Judge Blocked Trump’s Executive Order on Immigration......this just tweeted by Pamela Geller....OMG.....if true isnt that treason?

____________________________

Pamela is a couple days late to the party. The Independent Journal Review first published This "FAKE STORY". The reporter that started this whole thing has apologized, promised never to do it again, and the story has been officially retracted and removed. The congressional reporter for the IJR even quit over this "story" because he doesn't want to be associated anymore with the IJR. But, as do all good conspiracy theories, it will be mentioned over and over as fact for years to come I'm sure.

Anonymous said...Thank you Lynda for doing so. Did not infer you said there was anything odd. Just my observation. Very weird circumstances & is the community and local news asking for details? Parents should be very concerned.

March 18, 2017 at 11:48 AM________________

I agree..I think everyone in that town and surrounding areas should be on HIGH alert. I wouldn't let my kids go anywhere alone. He murdered 2 girls at once? Psychopathic killer running around there.

The police are not considering all possibilities.. The killer prob approached them offering to help them take pictures.The picture of Abby on bridge looks like it was taken by someone who is artistic or has photography as a hobby...it is taken at an angle to the bridge (instead of head on) to frame the shot artistically with the bridge and landscape framed well in the shot.The killer prob took the pic of the "Bridge Man" while helping the girls take pictures.The "Bridge Man" is not the killer imo.

IMO this killing resembles the double killing of the 2 sisters in Steven King's "The Green Mile".The killer has probably seen that movie & he probably has photography as a hobby.I think killer is between 30-50.He would have had episodes of explosive rage.He has problems with his own identity...that is why he attacked their heads/neck area.He hates one of his parents intensely (probably his father) and represses it while it simmers away.He enjoyed the feeling of power he got having these 2 girls terrified of him. He is sadistic.He premeditated this crime but was somewhat disorganized at the scene which leads me to believe he is from out of state....he figured his main goal was to flee and get out of there thinking to put geographic distance between himself and the scene of the crime.

Peter, how are emoticons changing the way humans communicate? I feel like they are doing this: shortening communication to a few words or sentence or two followed by a "forced emotion" within the emoticon range. One of the "forced emotions" that bothers me most is the emoticon with the one eye open more than the other with the tongue sticking out that indicates "wow isnt this situation crazy or wild" even though the situation could be "my dog likes eating off my plate". Why are people becoming puppets to technology? Very degrading to one of the things that makes us human: the ability to speak and write.

Wow, so are you affiliated w/the Russian moles in the FBI Criminal Division that swung the election to Trump, a Kremlin crony? It makes so much sense why you ranted Islamaphobia nonsense while Trump was clearly lying about contact with Russia. If you were a patriot you would have been screaming it on the street corner that he was Russia's man. You sadden me, I thought you were a good man. Now you stand idly by as he insults our IC & take the word of a Fox contributor, who got the story from a RT story, over his OWN IC! He's making enemies of our friends & is piss scared the FVEY have intelligence on him. Pro tip: If you don't want to be surveilled, don't talk to a Russian agent and get caught up in incidental collection! It's coming, soon, and patriots like McCain, Graham, McMullin, Grassley are standing up for America. You sir, are no patriot.

Alexandra said...The police are not considering all possibilities.. The killer prob approached them offering to help them take pictures.The picture of Abby on bridge looks like it was taken by someone who is artistic or has photography as a hobby...it is taken at an angle to the bridge (instead of head on) to frame the shot artistically with the bridge and landscape framed well in the shot.The killer prob took the pic of the "Bridge Man" while helping the girls take pictures.The "Bridge Man" is not the killer imo.

-------------------------

LE have stated that the "bridge man" pic is actually part of a video that Libby took with her phone. They created the "still" shot to post to media. So Libby was filming the man coming towards them on the bridge. I don't think anyone "helped" them with the video. LE has said that. they've also stated that there is quite a bit of video with more evidence but they are not going to release that..it is assumed that libby turned and kept video recorder going and actually filmed the whole thing, including the murders. I have a tendency to believe that because when police were talking about the video, they looked positively sick. Just heartbreaking and horrifying.

Linda, police looked horrified because of the gruesome nature of the crime.Are you saying that Libby videotaped her friend being murdered as well as herself being murdered? It's preposterous. Instead of trying to escape, Libby would have instead videotaped the murder while the killer also had no problem with her doing that? Oh and while knowing she would be killed next she kept a steady hand and calm cool and collected enough to videotape her friend's murder? It's so ridiculous--I understand some people are saying that in internet land, but it is unbelievable as well as virtually impossible that that occurred.It matters not if the Bridge Man was in a video or still photo on the phone, I believe the killer took the video of a random man while "helping" the girls take pictures.I have seen the video which shows the Bridge Man in motion walking, and it's clear he is in severe pain from a leg hip or back condition and that is why he walks in that very distinctive way. I believe it is also why he is walking looking down bc of his awkward, unbalanced walk to make sure he doesnt trip on anyway. (Also, Bridge Man's walk does not match Logan's walk). This Bridge Man who appears almost crippled with pain from a leg hip or back condition would not have been able to carry these girls who weigh 120 and 150 lbs, rape them, and brutally murder them. HE HAS SEVERE DIFFICULTY WALKING.

Anonymous Alexandra said...Linda, police looked horrified because of the gruesome nature of the crime.Are you saying that Libby videotaped her friend being murdered as well as herself being murdered? It's preposterous. Instead of trying to escape, Libby would have instead videotaped the murder while the killer also had no problem with her doing that? Oh and while knowing she would be killed next she kept a steady hand and calm cool and collected enough to videotape her friend's murder? It's so ridiculous--I understand some people are saying that in internet land, but it is unbelievable as well as virtually impossible that that occurred.

________________________

Whoa..take it easy.

Of course I'm not suggesting that libby stood idly by videotaping. The consensus is that she just kept it turned "on" while it was in her pocket. LE has NOT said that they are in possession of the phone, just that the recording/video came OFF her phone. Her phone could be missing but LE could pull it off the cloud. If the perp took her phone and deleted everything then trashed the phone, what she had recorded still would be on the cloud. Why would you even think of such a bizarre scenario of her and the killer "allowing" her to videotape? I believe LE when they call her a hero. She had the presence of mind to keep her phone turned on as long as able to give them literally the killers possible image and his voice. I don't know why you think he "carried" them anywhere? He's telling them to "go down the hill" they're obviously walking. Your theory of the killer taking the video of a "random" man that was in close proximity to all of them doesn't really hold up considering that the "bridge mans" pic has been put up and shown thruout the world, and is on over 6000 billboards thruout our nation. Do you really think anyone, that had nothing to do with the crime, wouldn't have heard about it? Wouldn't say..."Hey, I was there around that time?" Wouldn't have come forward by now? It's a town of 3000 people. The man on the bridge is the killer most likely.

I think the property owner may have done it. His words are sensitive, and his alibi sucks (20 miles away buying tropical fish). Maybe he locked them in his house and killed them at night. Why hasnt the FBI profiled the killer--they said they were going to do it a month ago. Or the guy from STALK Inc profiling--why havent they asked him to do a profile or give input?

This site came up when I googled "Delphi killer profile" (although they did not profile him in the article).

In my original profile of the killer, it came to me that the killer has worked on a farm and has slaughtered animals. I then discoverd property owner appears to have somewhat of a farm as he is petting his horses in one video.

I read somewhere that one of the girl's bodies was still warm when they found them the next day around noon, which means she was alive that morning. This led me to believe that property owner may have brought them to his house and then killed them near the stream during the night/early morning (when still dark). The quote from property owner I then discovered points to this:

"To have something like this in your own house, your own home"

Property owner's walk does not match Bridge Man (you can see him walking in one interview). But, I do not believe Bridge Man is the killer.

I believe property owner's language is sensitive in quote provided by a poster further upthread particularly regarding the appearance of Bridge Man.

First it must clear thru our UK bureau. They'll then forward to Westminister who'll dispatch to Scotland yard to analyze. From there its rewritten at BBC and pigeon delivered to the Home office: to avoid wikileaks. From there its scrutinized for suitability for prime time consumption and awaits the queens ok.

I've seen the video you have seen (2 stills). Do you wonder why LE hasnt released more of him walking? What is stopping them? I noticed right away his gait looks weird. There has been talk online with some thinking he was walking that way to avoid a rotten part of the bridge. Tell me why they havent released more of him walking since that could help identify him.I think Logan killed them maybe with help from his son (the "Get down the hill" voice).Maybe Logan even used the horse to go down there or bring them back down there during the night after he kidnapped them. That would have prevented his own footprints from being seen. The horse saw something.

Im thinking Logan or his son may have lured the girls using the horse. Like told them "Theres a beautiful white horse down the hill. Do you want to go see him?" As soon as the girls agreed to go see the horse, he probably became authoritarian saying "Get down the hill".The way Logan pats the horse and the terrified way the horse reacts to him I feel like the horse saw him hurt the girls. And the way he pats the horse, it's almost like he's saying "good job" like he feels the horse was his "partner in crime" even though the horse is terrified of him.

Also regarding the 2 stills. I have seen 2 different versions. In one he is walking with feet wide apart and turned out (very awkward and many people have commented online about he is having trouble walking). In the one I watched yesterday it looked like he was having no trouble walking. So how do you explain that? It seems like there are 2 different versions out there!