Although
description
logic can address questions by its critical and generally systematic
approach that is reliance on reasoned argument in conventional law
of thought, it is fundamentally based on its specific branch of philosophy
that draws conclusions in its postulated abstract
with what it posits.

If
scientists in consensus agreed that a theory with its propositional
knowledge was correct with its validated logical basis in its subjective
reality that emulates the objective
reality, it would mean they have believed the theory was correct.
If they thought it was incorrect, it would mean they have believed it
was incorrect.

What
one has believed as an actuality is one thing, what is its actuality could
be another thing.

“Science
is the belief in the ignorance of experts.”-
Richard Feynman

A
proposition for the actuality of a natural phenomenon merely concluded
with deductive
logic of its hypothetical
construct, does not make it true or not true; the proposition is merely
valid
or invalid for its logically deduced conclusion in its subjective reality.

Unsustainably,
the logic and belief system of a validated theory, could be logically
construed in a delusion of its cognitive paradox, caused by the
paradoxical effect of nature that renders the delusion with a subliminal
natural negation.

“In
questions of science, the authority of a thousand
is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.”-
Galileo Galilei

“Nature
is relentless and unchangeable, and it is indifferent as to whether
its hidden reasons and actions are understandable to man or not.”-
Galileo Galilei

In
the worldview of the Copernican
heliocentrism, the Kepler's
laws of planetary motion can illustrate with mathematical logic that
orbits are elliptical, and these laws have had thus invalidated the postulation
of circular planetary orbits. Despite logical analysis with mathematical
principle can invalidate or disprove with the know-what proposition of
its validated a
posteriori postulation, it cannot prove its posits for its claims
of fact; it is known in modern astronomy that the Sun is not motionless
nor is it anywhere near the center of the universe
as were posited with the Copernican heliocentrism.

An
incorrect hardcore belief would insidiously corrupt all its perceptions
that are perceived in its delusion.

A
self-reference
analysis of its belief could be fundamentally asserted by its consilience,
and thus can be jointly exhaustive in its manifold of deductive reasoning
to validate its proposition. In its subliminal circular
reasoning, it therefore could irrefutably validate the proposition
in its premise, and infallibly conclude it in its subjective reality with
its tautology for asserting its belief.

One
can persistently fool himself in a delusion that paradoxically and consistently
asserts his fallacious belief, and therefore persistently believes in
what is not true.

With
the various postulations for a finite (closed) or an infinite (open) universe,
the universe is or is not filled with an all-pervasive physical entity
of aether corpuscles, integrated with various combinations of posit
for variant or invariant dimensions of space,
variant or invariant dimension of time,
therefore in such deviations, there are sixteen possible paradigms
for the nature
of objective reality.

Each
of these paradigms on the nature of reality
with its posits for its conceptual framework, can be the basis for its
hypotheses of the empirically observed natural phenomena. And at its best,
it can logically, coherently, quantitatively, and consistently explicate
its propositional
knowledge of empirical observed natural phenomena in its worldview.

With
logical tautology, anything can be deemed valid by its self-fulfilling
prophecy that asserts with its validated logical reasoning in its belief
system. This is despite it can never actually prove anything with the
posits for its premise, which at the first place is its belief of the
objective reality, postulated for proving its predication with the logic
construed in its premise.

Knowing
how to make it work is one thing, how it actually works is another issue,
and what you think on how it fundamentally works could be another story.

Any
theory extrapolated from a foundation that was based on an incorrect paradigm
of reality would be fallacious at its best, this is despite its valid
conclusions deduced in its abstract can be analytically true, and can
also pragmatically
work.

“Without
realizing the cognitive paradoxes that negate to cause delusions in the
observable universe,
the paradoxical effect of nature has had fooled even the very intelligent
people.”-
UVS inspired-

If
obsessed with logically consistent and coherent a posteriori
propositions for a deterministic
theory, axiomatically
established on any of the paradigms with the rigors for precise quantitative
predictions, and ignores qualitative evaluation for thea priori
propositions in its paradigm, thus, in the realm of its scientific
model with its validated quantitative analyses of the empirically
observed natural phenomena in exact
science, one could persistently fool himself in all sorts of delusion
with all sorts of artificial cognitive paradox.

The
artificial cognitive paradoxes of such
deterministic theories, caused
their physical
paradoxes as a result of their fallaciously contrived posits
that render all sorts of science delusion.

The
foundations for such spuriousdeterministic
theories,
established with all sorts of assumptions in their belief systems of the
objective reality, can be validated with their logical interpretations
of the empirical observed natural phenomena perceived in the realms of
their subjective reality.

A
mathematically proven deterministic
theory
that is analytically and logically deduced to be valid with its hard
science in its subjective reality, although could be made unassailable
by substantiating with deductive proof that has true
value, its conclusion is merely analytically true for its a
priori propositions.

A fallaciously endorsed posit of a scientific model, is the mother of
all its science delusions.

“Intrinsically, a quantitative proof of a
scientific theory,
is not the proof for the scientific theory.”-
UVS inspired-

“Any
law of physics that suffers foundational crisis with any of its posits,
would paradoxically distort its perception of reality.”-
UVS inspired-

“Any
physical law or axiom for the a priori proposition
of an empirical observation that is claimed to have been conclusively
proven by the quantitative rigors of its a posteriori
knowledge, is the causality of its cognitive paradox fallacy with
its fallacious posit for objective reality.”-
UVS inspired-

“Physics
should adopt the qualitative studies of natural phenomena as its
primary discipline,
and then follow with their quantitative studies as its secondary
discipline for developing their a posteriori knowledge.”-
UVS inspired-

“Without
qualitative proof, it cannot be certain that
the quantitative proof of a scientific theory is true.”- UVS inspired-

If obsessed with any belief system that the actualities
of natural phenomena in objective reality, can be established merely with
conceptual
metaphors in metascience
that are logically coherent and comprehensive for its successful explanations
for the wonders of nature, it could lead to all sorts of fallacious assertions
in its subjective reality, reified by all sorts of self-fulfilling prophecy
and circular reasoning with what it postulates.

The
propositions of such interpretations in their fallacy
of misplaced concreteness, can be logically established with philosophical
rigors and precise quantitative predictions in all sorts of delusion,
construed with all sorts of artificial cognitive paradox for the perceptions
of natural wonders in the belief systems of their subjective realities.

A
fallacy of its metaphoric proposition derived in its indoctrinated belief
system, which can render its illusion of knowing in its delusion, could
be logically stemmed from the fallacious postulation of its conceptual
metaphor.

A
fallaciously endorsed conceptual metaphor of a metascience, is the mother
of all its fallacies.

Delusion
is the mother of all its illusions of knowledge.

“The
greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”-
Daniel Joseph Boorstin

See
an externally linked topic on "Allegory
of the Cave" that elaborates on obfuscated perceptions by perceiving
reality with shadows in its subjective reality.

See
the UVS subtopic on "The
apparent retrograde motion of a planet" that illustrates a fallacious
conceptual metaphor of geocentricism, which had incorrectly concluded
the actuality of a typical type of apparent observations with its superior
quantitative predictions.

To
relate with an example of systemic negation that is constructed by artificial
synergetic for its logical basis, one can explore the synergetic functions
of logic
gates with Boolean
logic in the field of digital
electronics, which are involved with modern technologies in devising
of electronic products through designing and making of digital circuits.

The
propositional logic of a digital system, is absolutely subjected to the
tautology
of its logical construct that could incorporate all sorts of logical negation
for the system to pragmatically work for serving its purpose, and thus
its logic can only be valid within the worldview of its logical construct.

The
truth tables (figure 1) listed below are the outcomes
of its logical operators (Logic gates, figure 2)
in the order of AND gate, OR gate, NOT x OR y gate and XOR gate, are some
of the Boolean algebraic functions that can also be represented with other
logic gate equivalents in other configurations (figure
3), or in Venn diagrams (figure 4).

In
binary numbers, the function for AND and OR gate are quite easy to understand,
and these are very similar to the manner it is used in common languages.
However, for a complex logical operator such as the XOR
logic gate, its logic function is apparently counterintuitive. In a straight
forward logical sense when a set of sequential inputs is applied, it apparently
has a counterintuitive set of logical outcomes through its function of
logical
negation, which is obtained with a logic gate configuration of universal
gates arranged for its specific negated function.

This
is a category of digital logic gates that implements exclusive
disjunction for its logical outputs, and can be physically constructed
in different configurations using only NAND
or NOR
gates. NAND and NOR gates are universal gates that can be used to derive
16
possible Boolean algebraic functions. NAND
and NOR logic gates are the two pillars of logic in digital electronics,
in that all other types of Boolean logic gates that each has a specific
digital logic function (i.e., AND, OR, NOT, XOR, XNOR,
etc), can be created from a suitable network of only NAND or NOR
gates.

Take
a scenario of one who does not understand the tautology of a logic gate
configuration, or the negations used in the propositional logic with De
Morgan's laws for a systematical model constructed in Boolean logic,
which is derived with the truth tables for those logic gates. Be it ignorance,
inability to understand it, or refused to blindly follow in a religious
manner for the truth tables for the functions of the logic gates, therefore
uses only limited types of logic gate that are comprehended, and omits
those logic gates with complex logical negations that apparently have
contradicting functions, or are counterintuitive and therefore are not
correctly understood. In such manners the attempts for development of
digital circuit to arrive to a solution for a digital logic application,
is obviously a lame approach. The electronic system devised in such simplified
manners, would have crippled functionalities, and its logical workability
is bound to breakdown under certain logical operating circumstances.

“Everything
should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.”- Albert Einstein

On
another hand, without understanding the applied logical tautologies and
negations in the digital system to troubleshoot a logic circuit of an
electronic device, is also a lame approach. With moot reasoning this would
cause misinterpretations for the functions of circuitry unwarily with
partial understanding and limited knowledge of the logical operators,
and therefore could only do guesswork in a trial
and error process, and thus makes all sorts of fallacious deduction
with a belief system of his own delusion.

“You
can never solve a problem on the level on which it was created.”
- Albert Einstein

In
another scenario, one who can design an electronic logic circuit according
to an application requirement, accomplished by using appropriate logic
gates based on faith in the truth tables under their known limited circumstances.
With this logic circuit development method, one can effectively apply
an efficacious digital logic solution efficiently for its pragmatic application
in digital electronics. One does not need to know the complex details
for the logic gates used, as in whatever logic gate configuration that
constructs the required logic gate circuit as an end product, nor the
p-n
junctions in the assembly of semiconductors
as integrated
circuit that forms the mechanism to trigger the logic gate function.
This is an example of religiously incorporating a belief system in a process
for its technical developments, which can efficiently derive effective
and workable solutions for their digital logic applications, and it is
simply based on the truth tables for pragmatic applications of the digital
logic gates.

However,
this approach is based on faith religiously in a belief system that within
known parameters, one can productively conceive solutions for digital
circuit designs regardless of its fundamental working principles on higher
or lower level. On higher level the working principle is concerning the
systematical model derived in Boolean
algebra, and the details of its logic gate configuration. On lower
level, it is concerning the physics of semiconductors. Anyone in this
category although may know how to pragmatically develop any electronic
logic circuit effectively and efficiently, but he can be blind to the
fundamental working principles that are involved on higher and lower levels.

In
digital logic applications by religiously based on the truth tables for
the developments of digital electronic devices, the applications can be
boundless within the limits of digital logic functions, which are designed
within the properties of the semiconductor devices, available resources,
and as much as one can ever imagine.

“Logic
will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”-
Albert Einstein

However,
if one is ignorance of the fundamental working principles that governs
digital electronics, and therefore does not have the necessary knowledge
that are required for research and development works to materialize a
digital device for attaining some crucial logical functions in extreme
circumstances, such as in sub-zero temperature environments, or extreme
vibration situations, henceforth, any ingenious design or development
of logic circuit device in an act of blind faith could be unrealistic
and impractical. This would be so when the design is conceived beyond
the known capabilities and properties of digital electronics that the
required logical functions could not be pragmatically implemented.

In
the digital logic sense, applying logic without religiously following
an adopted logical function model based on faith is lame,
and it is blind to follow the logical function model
religiously without really knowing the underlying working
principles, but has faith in it just because it had always worked for
serving its purpose.

“I
maintain that cosmic religiousness is the strongest
and most noble driving force of scientific research.”-
Albert Einstein

“Science
without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.”-
Albert Einstein

Peculiarly,
in a typical topsy-turvy manner, the paradoxical effect of nature delusively
and subliminally manifest all sorts of natural cognitive
paradox in the apparent observations of the paradoxically rendered
natural phenomena.

In
a paradoxically observed universe, to resolve the natural cognitive paradoxes
of the apparent observations, it requires to invoke transcendental
perceptions for perceiving the underlying structures and working mechanisms
to evaluate the paradoxically rendered natural phenomena, so as to elucidate
all sorts of delusion
that are being rendered by the paradoxical effect of nature with its subliminal
natural negations
manifested in a typical topsy-turvy manner.

“With
the visualizations on the underlying structures and mechanisms of natural
phenomena,
these intuitively induce the resolutions for the revelations on their
actualities.”
- UVS inspired -

Note:
The UVS research with its methodology and its philosophy of science, were
independently conceived with no prior knowledge on the Age
of Enlightenment. Despite some works of the UVS research closely resemble
the works of the earlier philosophers who influenced the Enlightenment,
such as those works of Descartes,
Francis
Bacon, Locke,
Spinoza,
and Joseph-Louis
Lagrange, the research nevertheless has its uniqueness in its own
ways. Nonetheless, the treatise of UVS as it is now presented, has had
incorporated the notions and terminologies of epistemology,
empiricism,
and paradigm
shift at a later stage for structuring its presentations. The UVS
topics are also furnished to enrich with the later developments of the
most influential publication of the Enlightenment: the Encyclopédie.

.The
criteria of truth for the UVS research-
The UVS' theory of knowledge

“The
more you see, how strange nature behaves, the harder it is for us,
to make a model, that explains even how the most simple phenomena works.
Theoretical physics has given up on this pursuit.”-
Richard Fenyman

As a qualitatively refined scientific method for checking the wholeness
and integrity of any propositional knowledge on the predicated actuality
of a natural phenomenon, in the paradigm
shift of the UVS
model, the trilogy can be applied to rigorously evaluate its predication
with metaphysics for its ontological proposition, with physical science
for its a priori proposition, and with theoretical physics
for its a posteriori proposition.

See
externally linked topics on "The
Tripartite Theory of Knowledge" that elaborates on justified
true belief, "Scientific
realism" that elaborates on the view of the universe described
by science is real regardless of how it may be interpreted, and "Baconian
method" that
elaborates on the inception of the original scientific method of modern
science.

Firstly,
for its evaluation in metaphysics, it would require to invoke the hypothetical
construct for illustrating the underlying structure and mechanism of the
natural phenomenon that are coherently based on the UVS model. This process
with its coherently established hypothesis
and discernablecircumstantial
evidence, evaluates the ontological
proposition of the natural phenomenon with metaphysical rigors for its
belief
in its theory
of justification; this is the process for coherence
theory of truth for its ontological actuality perceived in the nature
of reality.

And
thirdly, for its evaluation in theoretical physics, it would require to
invoke the scientific
modelling of its hypothesis. This process with its empirical
evidence and its justified a priori proposition, evaluates
the a posteriori proposition on the predicated actuality
of the natural phenomenon with quantitative rigors for its justification
in its quantitative
research; this is the process for pragmatic
theory of truth for its quantitative actuality construed in its emulated
reality.

In
a nutshell, this is the theory
of knowledge in the UVS research for cross-examining the propositions
of knowledge with these criteria
of truth in the multidisciplinary approach. And this is the basis
for the epistemological paradigm shift of the UVS research for its
scientific revolution to advance our knowledge for the empirically
observed natural phenomena as perceived in the observable
universe.

Despite
the inductive resolutions of natural phenomena in the UVS research are
mostly in their qualitative forms, many of the evidently
verified and proven a priori propositions with their
elucidated delusions and resolved cognitive paradoxes, unequivocally are
the well justified true beliefs that are free of paradoxically fallacious
Gettier
problems. And thus by themselves, the predications of these verified
and proven a priori propositions, are already significant
contributions as the a
priori
knowledge for the actualities of the qualitatively evaluated natural
phenomena.

“I
have often made the hypothesis that ultimately physics will not require
a mathematical statement,
that in the end the machinery will be revealed and the laws will turn
out to be simple.”-
Richard Fenyman

Nonetheless,
the followings examples are some significant
revolutionary discoveries that have had applied the qualitatively
refined scientific method of UVS that are completed with quantitative
analyses for substantiating their a priori propositional
knowledge,
thus established their a posteriori propositional knowledge
with their well justified true beliefs, and therefore extend the knowledge
of the natural phenomena in their accurateness with quantitative precisions:

The
barycenter drivers of the solar cycleThis
UVS case study applied qualitative and quantitative analyses with its
inductive resolution on the quantified barycenters of the significant
Solar System objects, which thus pinpointed the planetary drivers for
the solar cycles from 1 to 24.

Cometary
outburstThis UVS case study applied qualitative
and quantitative analyses for its inductive resolution on the quantified
barycenters and Lagrangian
points of significant Solar System objects, which thus pinpointed
the hypothesized energetic point sources that could cause the events
of cometary outburst.

“Enlightenment
on the paradoxical effect of nature, enlightens.”- UVS inspired-

“By
knowing the paradoxical effect of nature, it enlightens on how nature
negates to render delusions in a typical topsy-turvy manner.”
- UVS inspired -

A
duology of science and enlightenment:

Science
without enlightenment renders hypotheses for pragmatism
with the naturally obfuscated perceptions of natural
phenomena in their postulated subjective realities.

Science
with enlightenment renders revelations
for actualities
with transcendental perceptions of natural phenomena
in the realism of objective reality.

-
UVS inspired

A
trilogy for the wholeness and integrity of knowledge, which
rigorously cross-examines the actualities of natural phenomena
with the congregations in a tripartite to form a consistent
system of inquiry process as the criteria of truth:

Metascience
with coherence theory of truth, seeks and establishes
metaphysical truths on actualities with the congregation
of philosophical rigor in the nature of reality.

Physical
science with correspondence theory of truth, seeks and
establishes immutable truths on actualities with the congregation
of qualitative rigor in the reality of nature.

Hard
science with pragmatic theory of truth, seeks and establishes
unassailable truths on actualities with the congregation
of quantitative rigor in the modellings of reality.

From
what comes later; after experience. From particular effects to a general
principle; based upon actual observation or upon experimental data:
an a posteriori argument that derives the theory from the evidence.

An
a
posteriori offering or suggesting something
to be considered, accepted, adopted, or done.

cognition

-

The
understanding and trying to make sense of the world.

cognitive
paradox

-

A
category of paradox with illusions that are pertaining to perception
or awareness, such as with relative motion illusion, optical illusion,
tactile illusion and the likes.

cognitive
paradox fallacy

-

The
formal logical fallacy of a cognitive paradox.

delusion

-

A
false belief or opinion: delusions of grandeur.

dilate

-

To
spread out; expand.

enlighten

-

Give
greater knowledge and understanding about a subject or situation.

enlightenment

-

Full
comprehension of a situation with clarity of perception.

infinities

-

The
manifold of infinity; manifold of increases without bound.

inversed
illusion

-

A
peculiar type of illusion that paradoxically appears in an inverse
manner.

involution

-

An
act or instance of involving or entangling; involvement, the state
of being involved.

natural
negation

-

A
naturally rendered contradiction that is counterintuitive.

natural
phenomenon

-

A
natural phenomenon is a non-artificial event in the physical sense,
and therefore not produced by humans, although it may affect humans.

nothingness

-

A
state of existence beyond perceivable bandwidth therefore renders
as nothing in the perceived state; the state of being nothing.

paradox

-

Any
thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature
with false proposition.

realm

-

The
region, sphere, or domain within which anything occurs, prevails,
or dominates: the realm of dreams.

resolution

-

The
act of analyzing a complex notion into simpler ones; the point in
a literary work at which the complication is worked out.

science

-

Knowledge,
as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.

scientific
theory

-

A
theory that has achieved scientific consensus that its accepted explanation
through a scientific model is based on observation, experimentation,
and reasoning.

self-evolution

-

Evolution
of one's self; development by inherent quality or power.

singularity

-

A
peculiarity, a unique quality, a state of being singular. Note: The term singularity
here does not refer to mathematical singularity nor the gravitational
singularity.It
has very general reference to a class of existence with a similarity.

spheroid

-

A
geometrical figure similar in shape to a sphere, such as an ellipsoid.

subliminal

-

Existing
or functioning below the threshold of consciousness or perception.

synergetic

-

working
together; cooperative.

theory

-

A
coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation
for a class of phenomena.

“We
took the imaginary point singularity and made a dot.
. We took the dot and made a line.
. We took the line and made an angle.
. We took the angle and made a ramp.
. We took the ramp and made a screw.
. We took the screw and made a vortex.
. We took the vortex and made a torus.
. We took the torus and made a dot.
. We took the dot and indeed we see imagination rise its head.”
- Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum), 10th August 2009

“Objectively
speaking, even in its present mostly qualitative form, UVS makes a significant
contribution to the discovery of spiral nature of the universe. No person
holds a complete truth about the nature of the universe, and UVS brings
attention of scientists to an interesting path of solving this very challenging
problem.”,
“With
great respect, Vladimir.”
(28th
Jun 2009)
- Dr.
Vladimir B. Ginzburg, mathematician,
accomplished material scientist, author of "Prime
Elements of Ordinary Matter, Dark Matter & Dark Energy",
"Spiral Grain of the Universe" and several other renowned books
such as "Metallurgical
Design of Flat Rolled Steels" for applied science, and holds
over fifty U.S. and foreign patents.

~
This section on "The functions of logic gates with Boolean logic"
in this web page, was written in appreciation to David
Appleton for his very immersive lectures on semiconductor
device, digital logic, and as my mentor.

~
With special thanks to Dean Ward (aka junglelord) for his support of UVS,
his posts on Synergetics in Thunderbolts Forum for a thread on "Tensegrity
Creates Matter!", and his assertion with "Structure and
Function Cannot Be Seperated".

Disclaimers: The treatise of Universal Vortical Singularity (UVS) in its epistemological paradigm shift, is fundamentally unconventional. Its hypotheses grounded on a generally unheard-of UVS model, bound to have shortcomings, such as loose ends, errors, and omissions errors. Many details and assumptions in its propositions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated, or verified. Its implicit explanations are for casual understanding of the UVS topics presented in the UVS worldview, so if any term or statement is offensive in any manner from whatsoever perspectives, is most regretted. Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Also, the content of the UVS topics, from time to time could be arbitrarily modified without any notice.

Viewing
tips: Despite the presentations of the UVS web pages has went through
much accommodation for their viewings on smart phones, they are still
not entirely friendly to these mobile devices. For the best experiences,
use a MS Windows based PC or computer system with Java enabled browser
for running its interactive applets.
(Such asJava
Applet of Moiré pattern,JPL
Small-Body Database Browser, andPlanet
Finder.)

Copyright
information: This UVS web site is for non-profit purposes and not for
commercial use. Wherever possible, direct credits to the origins of the
works or images were provided, be it onfair
dealings, with explicit permission from
their owners, or the materials were believed to be from thepublic
domain.