The plaintiff, who sued under the pseudonym Jane Roe, was pulled out of her training class after a week and fired Oct. 18, 2006, because she failed a pre-employment drug test. She had a valid medical-marijuana authorization from a doctor.

In court documents, the company said its contract with Sprint required drug testing and makes no exception for medical marijuana.

Thankfully, we have choices in cell phone providers. I’ll be contacting Sprint regarding this case, and asking why their policy makes no exception for medical marijuana. For those of you out there with Sprint coverage, here’s a page edited by Wired that gives you tips on how to get out of your cellular contract.

Share:

Related

Comments

Unfortunately it is becoming increasingly clear that there is a coordinated multi-state assault on voter initiative mandated medical marijuana laws. For some reason eliminating medical marijuana has become a top priority of the Obama administration and local authorities.

This instance of employment discrimination is just another example of the hysteria that was whipped-up against cannabis over the years. Lots of employers out there have drug testing for cannabis use, but all that’s going to be obsolete soon. {Wonder if they’ll develop drug testing for alcohol use the night before??}

Be sure to sign the proposal to put I-1149 on this November’s ballot. It’s time to end these crazy drug laws, starting with the laws against cannabis!

The state supreme court case didn’t even try to litigate the most obvious problem with this case: why in hell does anyone need to pass a drug screening test to work at a call center? It’s not like she was going to be operating heavy machinery or working air traffic control. Hell, for a job that tedious and mind-numbing, I would think illicit substance use might help job performance.

So long as I’m not harming others, it’s nobody else’s business what I put in my body. Not the government’s, and certainly not a major corporation’s.

Ms. Roe did not assert a claim for discrimination based upon disability

.

That was actually my first thought: if Roe was using medical marijuana due to the medical treatment of a disability, the company was clearly violating the ADA by firing her.

The link also quotes a company spokesman as justifying the drug test by its wanting to prevent employees from divulging confidential customer information. As if being high in your off hours makes someone more likely to write down a credit card number and post it on the Internets.

The point of using medical marijuana is so that the effects of the illness are no longer debilitating. Like with migraines in this case. Do you have any idea how many people rely on medical marijuana simply to be able to function normally?

Medical marijuana will continue to be in a gray area as long as federal and state governments enact concurrent laws and there’s a conflict between federal and state law.

As a practical matter, what MMA means is the state will no longer prosecute you if you comply with MMA. One down, one to go.

The question then becomes how willing are federal law enforcers and prosecutors to exert themselves to go after medical marijuana suppliers and users. If they want to shut it down, it’s logical they’d go after the suppliers, to choke the supply chain. One patient probably isn’t worth an assistant U.S. attorney’s time.

Switching providers won’t help – most corporate employers now do pre-employment drug screening (none for alcohol use, unfortunately). This tends to give corporations and even smaller companies a break on their insurance rates.

This is bigger than smoking a joint – whether for medicinal use, or pleasure, or both.

This is about maintaining and extending the puritanical/corporate reach for further control of our lives – something the Obama Administration seems to have no compunction about facilitating.

Corporate America wants hordes of desperate, frightened bots to toil away under more and more restrictive conditions. I think the ease with which stepping out of line gets you a criminal record, or a damaged credit score, is a feature not a bug – disempowering masses is the name of the game.

It’s a sick confluence of Calvinistic judgement and capitalistic greed that underlies the assault on joyful existence.

@18 I don’t know, but I’d like to find out. I might go to the mall kiosks and ask the employees there if they had to take drug tests and start from there. I emailed Sprint through my customer service account about their policy and I’ll see if I hear back this week.

We use CREDO mobile and long distance. I don’t know what their employment policies are, but they do distribute profits back to lefty charities that the subscribers vote for each year. They do, however, IIRC, buy their access from SPRINT, so it’s still tainted.

21

Puddybud, identifying northwest liberals who elected an underexperienced man to the presidency weighed down by an oversized egospews:

Please Donate

I appreciate feeling appreciated. Also, money.

Currency:

Amount:

Can’t Bring Yourself to Type the Word “Ass”?

Eager to share our brilliant political commentary and blunt media criticism, but too genteel to link to horsesass.org? Well, good news, ladies: we also answer to HASeattle.com, because, you know, whatever. You're welcome!

Search HA

Follow Goldy

HA Commenting Policy

It may be hard to believe from the vile nature of the threads, but yes, we have a commenting policy. Comments containing libel, copyright violations, spam, blatant sock puppetry, and deliberate off-topic trolling are all strictly prohibited, and may be deleted on an entirely arbitrary, sporadic, and selective basis. And repeat offenders may be banned! This is my blog. Life isn’t fair.