Frominside.com

Only The Guilty Go Quietly To The Gallows.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY SUPPRESSES EVIDENCE OF
INNOCENCE IN DECADES-OLD MURDER CASE!

In 1990, I, David Scott Harrison, was
falsely convicted for the murder of my ex-wife,
Ann Jenkins -- a crime of which I am 100%
innocent. That grave injustice was the result
of incompetent defense counsel and a malefactor
prosecutor, Larry A. Burns, who is now a federal
judge in San Diego, California. Biological
evidence exists to prove my innocence.

At the totally circumstantial evidence
prosecution, the only eyewitness testified:

(1) to observing an argument outside the
residence wherein the murder occurred;

(2) and pointing directly at me, testified that
I was not the man arguing with Ann; and

(3) that the man was standing alongside a truck
identical to the truck driven by Gary Jenkins,
Ann's husband.

The only biological evidence collected from the
crime scene consists of two hairs, which Burns
argued at trial matched the color of my hair.
Deoxyribonucleic Acid ("DNA") testing was in its
infancy in 1990, and was not capable of testing
the hairs. Mitochondrial and Short-Tandem Repeat
testing methods now exist, which can
conclusively test the hairs. The hairs remain in
the possession, custody, and control of Bonnie
Dumanis, District Attorney of San Diego,
California. But Dumanis, embedded with Burns,
has misspent hundreds-of-thousands of taxpayers'
dollars over more than a decade in opposing my
every effort to gain access to the hairs for DNA
testing purposes.

Dumanis has also rejected my numerous offers to
pay every cent of DNA testing -- at no cost to
her office or the taxpayers. Moreover, I have
repeatedly presented Dumanis a CONTRACT
explicitly offering that if she agrees to DNA
testing of the hairs, and if that testing finds
either of the hairs to have come from me, then I
would immediately cease efforts at vindication
-- seemingly a gift ... if Dumanis truly
believed me to be guilty. To the contrary,
Dumanis and Burns know that I have never set
foot inside the residence where the murder
occurred, hence the hairs cannot be from me.
Assuredly, the hairs were left by the
perpetrator(s), as it would be virtually
impossible not to leave transfer-evidence in the
commission of such a hands-on murder.

Ann's murder paid off big for Gary Jenkins; he
pocketed Ann's share of their recent lottery
winnings of nearly three-quarters of a million
dollars, and gained his freedom (Ann had
informed Gary of her plans to divorce him due to
his ongoing physical abuse, excessive drinking,
and womanizing.). Not surprisingly, Gary Jenkins
went to extreme lengths to blame me. Evidence
would later establish, among his other
fabrications, that Gary Jenkins' alibi for the
time of the murder was a lie!
By that time, however, Burns had already
publicly announced selecting me for prosecution.

Since my false conviction, I have been
unrelenting in pursuing my exoneration, and have
never wavered in my protests of innocence.

Truth, justice and an innocent life are being
suppressed. Proof of innocence rests in DNA
testing of the two hairs.

TROUBLING QUESTIONS:

** Why doesn't Dumanis -- in this 100%
circumstantial evidence conviction -- want to
DNA test biological evidence in her possession
that would determine whether I suffer a wrongful
conviction and false imprisonment?

** Why isn't Dumanis grasping at my CONTRACT; my
agreement to cease all efforts for vindication
should DNA test results show either of the hairs
to have come from me?

** Why, after entering into a written agreement
not to prosecute me in the event I agreed to
take, and passed, a government administered
polygraph test as to the murder, did Burns take
immediate personal possession of the test
results and conceal them from me (to this day,
despite intensive efforts, Burns refuses to
disclose or even discuss the test results)?

** Why did Burns boast to defense counsel that
he was "morally certain" I did not commit the
murder, but "bet" he could "win" a conviction?

** Why did Burns and the trial judge work
together to hastily "seal" the suicide letter
left by resistant prosecution witness, David
Johnson, whom some suspect to be the murderer,
and who committed suicide shortly after being
forced to testify? What is said in that letter
that so undermines my conviction that it had to
be secreted away?

Please take a few minutes of your time to urge
Bonnie Dumanis to test the biological evidence,
so that truth, justice, and innocence may at
last be realized.

I am happy to answer questions and be interviewed.
Additionally, any ideas or suggestions, help or
assistance, you may offer would be greatly appreciated.
Promotional ideas?
Thank you for your time and consideration.