Folks...a couple of days ago I shared the email that Grace Lutheran Church of Eau Claire (Wisconsin) president Anne Carter shared with her congregation breaking the news of the court decision that went against the congregation on Friday after protracted proceedings spanning nearly a year-and-a-half. Following is the address Anne made to the congregation during Sunday services, which fleshes out the ramifications (and the opportunities) the decision brings.

Top o’ the Morning to Ya and a Happy St. Patrick’s Day,Friday afternoon Judge Molly GaleWyrick entered a decision with the court in the lawsuit filed against Grace Lutheran Church. I have met with our attorney and with Pastor Nestingen briefly to discuss the decision. The decision made by Judge GaleWyrick is 4-1/2 pages long. A copy will be available in the church office tomorrow if anyone would care to read it. As with any legal document, there are terms unique to the legal profession and may not be easy to understand. Before I tell you the specifics of that decision, I want to go over some of the timeline of this suit. In November 2011, Amazing Grace ELCA, Inc. filed suit against Grace claiming that dual affiliation effectively split Grace into two entities – one was ELCA and one was LCMC. The suit claimed that authority in the church resided with Amazing Grace who claimed ELCA loyalty. They asked the court to overturn the current Council and turn over control of the assets of the church to them. We had 30 days to respond, and on January 6, 2012, we filed a motion to dismiss the suit claiming that the courts did not have the right to impose membership or governance on a church body. Once the lawsuit and our motion were filed, we had to follow the schedule of the court and the authority of a judge.In the meantime, Amazing Grace asked Bishop Duane Pederson to arrange adjudication on their behalf. The bishop arranged for a hearing before the Consultation Committee which resulted in a decision by the Synod Council on January 16, 2012. Grace Lutheran Church was then involved in two separate actions. It wasn’t until the summer of 2012 that Drew Ryberg, attorney for Amazing Grace, brought the two together by including the Synod Council’s decision in the lawsuit and asking the court to impose that decision on this church by removing our Council, turning over assets, evicting us from this building, etc.So, to simplify and to paraphrase the decision:

Judge GaleWyrick has ruled that the Synod Council's decision rendered on January 16, 2012, is final.

The judge can make the four directives of that decision the Order of the Court and enforce them.

Grace Lutheran Church has been referred to the Synod Council for guidance in the implementation of those directives.

Those directives briefly are:

That Grace terminate affiliations with LCMC or any church other than the ELCA.

That Grace 's sole affiliation is with the ELCA. Affiliation with the ELCA may be terminated only as permitted in the governing documents of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

That Grace restore to full voting membership all those voting members moved to associate member status.

That Grace follow the criteria found in our constitution section *C8.02(c) to determine voting eligibility except that those who wish to remain affiliated with LCMC are associate members.

The judge has ordered that Drew Ryberg draft an order in conformity with the decision and submit it to our attorney for approval. That is the court’s way of saying that the attorneys agree with each other about what the judge has ordered and write it up for her approval. After an order has been mutually agreed upon, the judge will sign it. That order is to be submitted by April 8, 2013. So, what does all this mean? I know that there are many questions. The court can only declare the directives to be final so we have to refer to the directives themselves to understand the practical implications of this decision. Will our Council be replaced? NO. The present Council was duly elected by Grace Lutheran members and will continue as our leadership. I have been recognized by the NW Synod as the president of Grace and will remain in that position. The Synod Council’s decision does not address our leadership. Do we lose control of our assets? NO. Our bank accounts still belong to Grace and will be maintained by present Council. The Synod Council’s decision does not address control of our assets. Do we have to vacate the building? NO. Despite the interrogatory that demanded to know our computer codes and the location of the keys to our building, we are not going anywhere. Will the pastors be forced to leave Grace? NO. Pastor Nestingen and Pastor Irgens were called by this congregation to serve God in this place and will remain our pastors for the duration. Will Amazing Grace members be able to vote on Grace matters? Yes. Those Amazing Grace members who are members of Grace Lutheran Church are currently classified as voting members. Their voting rights were restored last May in accordance with the Synod Council’s decision. Will Amazing Grace members be coming back to worship at Grace? I can’t answer that question. They have always been welcome here. It has been their choice not to worship here for almost two years. It has always been their right to choose a church that best fits their own personal desires and needs. Do we have to pay any monies to the ELCA to support their programs and policies? NO. There is no prescribed amount of money that a church must pay to the ELCA. We currently send no money to support the ELCA general budget. Will we always have to be an ELCA church? NO. The Synod Council decision reiterates our constitutional right to disaffiliate from the ELCA. This congregation has the right to determine its own future affiliation. If we are forced to be solely affiliated with the ELCA for the time being, does that mean that we owe some oath of fealty or loyalty to the organization? NO. We owe it something much bigger. We owe it the truth, and the truth is that leadership in the ELCA have been found guilty of embezzlement and fraud. The ELCA is involved in several lawsuits appropriating land and assets from congregations across the country. Long-standing ELCA institutions are in danger of collapse due to financial mismanagement. Scriptural divergences that used to be isolated have now become mainstream. Is this decision a bad thing? NO. We will soon be out of the jurisdication of the court and be able to plan and course the future of this church without interference. Were the last two years a waste? NO. Over the last two years we have seen that the warnings we made about the ELCA have come true. Over the last two years God has shaped us and molded us into a new church. We have come to a truer understanding of what it means to be in relationship with Him. And what kind of relationship is that? We are children of God who are members of God’s family here in this place called Grace. In this place we learn and study and grow and sing and give praise. We are disciples of Jesus Christ and with that comes responsibility. We are to be like the Christians in Berea who studied God’s Word to make sure that Paul was preaching the truth. We are to be watchdogs to let other ELCA members know the danger the church is in. We must call leadership to account. We must ask God’s people to repent. Most importantly, we are to continue to honor Jesus. Jesus is not myth. Jesus is not a metaphor. Jesus is the fulfillment of God’s promises made to us at the beginning. Jesus is not an image of us. He is the face of the Father. He is the Way, the Truth and the Life. It is through Him alone that we come to the Father, and it is through the Father that we receive forgiveness and salvation. We have had quite a journey, and it is not over yet. But hasn’t this been fascinating? We have been given a privilege not many people get: We have been given a front row seat to watch God in action. We are witnesses to His transformative power. He has changed us. He has brought His light into dark places. Is this over? The lawsuit, maybe. Or maybe this is just the beginning of a glorious and wondrous adventure with a loving Savior who trusts us enough to walk with us and allow us to work at His side.One thing’s for sure: This is the day that the LORD has made! We will rejoice and be glad in it!!Hallelujah!! Anne Carter17 March 2013

I so heartily commend you!!! Many blessings to you that you will be able to lead other ELCA churches out of the Abyss. My husband and I left an ELCA church finally, when we realized that there was not much we could do to make any changes. We have found a most conservative church, Evangelical Presbyterian (Oakhill in Grand Rapids, MI) where we are fed the word of God on a weekly basis and not taking any liberties with it's writings.

Reply

Ryan Hall

3/21/2013 11:43:01 am

The individual members of Grace Lutheran Church can swiftly end the ELCA's control of their lives simply by sending a letter of resignation from the congregation. (See the MODEL CONSTITUTION FOR CONGREGATIONS OF THE EVANGEILCAL LUTHERAN IN AMERICA, section C8.05: "Membership in this congregation shall be terminated by ... resignation."). ELCA pastors have been trained to ignore such letters, so be sure to send a photocopy to every church council member, and of course, retain one copy for your own records.

Reply

Pastor Dennis Beckmann LCMC

3/21/2013 11:00:30 pm

Very bad advice Ryan. If you as an individual resign from the ELCA you lose your rights as a voting member of a ELCA church which Gracee Lutheran is. Thus you can not vote in the decsion of such church to leave the ELCA. Your advice would have individuals losing their voice in their local church as it decides its future.

Reply

Ryan Hall

3/22/2013 04:49:43 am

But the court has alread forbidden Grace Lutheran to affiliate with any church body other than the ELCA, and the ELCA constitution does not allow congregations to leave unless they DO affiliate with some other Lutheran body. The ELCA, with the help of the courts, has already determined Grace Lutheran's future.

Scott Jahnz

3/21/2013 09:55:17 pm

Go Grace! I wish our church would leave the ELCA. Most of our congregation don't care. They don't know what's going on or have their head in the sand. I was on council and tried to get a vote and my wife is presently on council and getting frustrated too. God help us . We would leave but there are no conservative churches in our town. We'll wait and see what happens I guess. Been dealing with this issue of the 2009 ELCA decisions for over 3 years. Most members know a gay or have one in their family and let that impair their judgement of the true meaning of God's word.

How many like-minded believers stand with you? Enough to start a Bible-honoring fellowship? If all of you can't extricate your church from imprisonment behind the antinomian ELCA iron curtain, could you leave en masse and start a small church that honors God's Word? Maybe fed-up believers from other liberal churches in town would join you.

As I understand it, this NALC church -- http://www.newlifeluth.org -- was founded by believers (in this case from several ELCA churches) who didn't have the two-thirds support necessary to get their former ELCA churches in that city out of bondage.

Reply

Ryan Hall

3/22/2013 06:13:08 am

In my first post, I warned the readers that Lutheran pastors have been trained to ignore letters of resignation. The response I got only proves that I am right. For the readers who are confused by the contradictory advice, I'll try to clarify the matter: Your Lutheran pastor doesn't care whether he works for the ELCA or for LCMC or for Satan himself so long as he continues to collect his salary. Any talk of mass resignations threatens the pastor's salary, and therefore will be met with the stearnest denunciations.

"This afternoon both Pastor Nestingen and Pastor Irgens were informed by letter that they have been removed from the ELCA roster of clergy. Their removal is effective March 22, 2013. Bishop Duane Pederson removed both pastors. He reasons that both pastors have engaged in schismatic activity by allowing Grace Lutheran Church to dually affiliate with the LCMC. He also claims that they have defied the Synod Council's decision and the civil courts."

Ryan, I think you are confusing an individual's right to unilaterally resign from the ELCA with a congregation's right to disaffiliate. Individual members may leave or not leave Grace Lutheran. Grace Lutheran can leave the ELCA, or not, as long as it follows the disaffiliation procedures in place acknowledged and upheld by the court. (The main dispute was whose disaffiliation guidelines controlled; the ELCA's or Grace Lutheran's. The court sided with the ELCA - through the plaintiffs) Whether Grace disaffiates remains to be seen but recent events would suggest a good amount of polarization and vitalization has happened and that the congregation is well motivated to leave.

A Pastor has no right to "enforce" membership, as such, refusal to acknowledge will avail him nothing.

Lastly, the motives you assign to Pastors refusing to accept resignations (which I suspect are accepted by the council - not the Pastor) are sinester and purely speculative. Pastors are people and subject to the same flaws and talents as others but to make such blanket allegations is unfair at best.

Reply

Jonathan Smith

4/9/2013 09:04:48 am

Actually, that's not completely accurate. The dispute was NOT about which disaffiliation guidelines to follow, because there is only one set of rules for disaffiliation. Those rules are clear, easy, and laid out in the same way in both the constitutions of Grace Lutheran AND the ELCA. (Breifly, the procedure is: 1) a special congregational meeting must be called with disaffiliation as the only item on the agenda; 2) A congregational vote must pass a 2/3 threshold; 3) The church must wait at least 90 days for a period of consultation; and 4) The congregation must vote again, and if 2/3 is still reached, the congregation is no longer in the ELCA.)

The issue in this case is simply that of constitutional procedures. The pastors and congregation council failed to follow the rules that are laid out clearly in the church's own constitution.

That's what the court held. It was my understanding that Grace had not adopted the ELCA constitution and was using their own constitutional guidelines for disaffiliation and that was the basis of the suit.

As it stands the court said the ELCA's constitutional guidelines are Grace's guidelines making the point moot.

How favorable for the ELCA. A simple 51 percent of convention delegates can annul with one vote a part of the Bible that reproaches them for one of their favorite sins, but it takes two votes of 67 percent (with three months of arm-twisting in between) to free a congregation from the denomination's clutches.

Can you spell "imperious," parishioners?

Crs-wbl

4/30/2013 02:20:12 am

Interesting that after all this fighting, the church facility is not even for now used for worship! What was the fight about again?

I am sorry to see you are not on TV but am glad for you that you stood up to the ELCA. When I turned it on today, they had 1 woman singing in choir and wouldn't show the congregation, only two women in front pew. Tells it all, they had only 3 people their with a new woman pastor. Hope you can give sermons in a new building, God will help you. God's blessings.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

Leave a Reply.

Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. ​1 Thessalonians 5:21

Dan Skogen

Former ELCA seminary student and former ELCA member who is fed up with the ELCA's consistent mockery of God's Word.

If you have been helped and blessed by Exposing the ELCA's ministry, please help us continue to proclaim the truth of God's Word to ELCA members who need to hear it.