Our
heads have been spinning with these early state presidential elections.
“The inability to become aroused over any of the choices for president
put forth by either party in the 2008 election year,” says another NWV
contributor, Randy Murray, is called Electile Dysfunction.

They
talk about change. What change? We changed from a Constitutional Republic
with individual responsibilities to a collective Keynesian socialist society
(democracy) with power being given to Washington, D.C. under Republican
President Lincoln and most notably other presidents thereafter, i.e. Wilson,
FDR, Nixon, Johnson and most recently, our own President George W. Bush
since the 9/11 incident. Only Ron Paul wants change back to our Constitutional
Republic.

Believing
their representatives were watching out for their freedoms and taking
their Oaths of Office seriously, the electorate did not realize vague,
unconstitutional laws were incrementally being enacted while they trusted
and slept.

After
9/11, President G.W. Bush put the frosting on the cake with his Homeland
Security. Naomi Wolf, author of The End of America writes about
such intrusions into our lives by the Patriot Act, Defense Authorization
Act and the elimination of Habeas Corpus. When the Terrorism Information
and Prevention System (TIPS) met with opposition, a version of this program,
she says, was simply shifted to the Pentagon’s “black budget.” She fails
to admit how the Democrats are equally responsible. Didn’t we get the
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) under President Bill Clinton,
with the blessing of a Republican Congress controlled by supposedly conservative
Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich with talk show host, Rush Limbaugh
becoming a cheerleader -- or was it “water boy?” Former Presidential Reform
Party candidate Ross Perot warned NAFTA was the giant sucking sound of
jobs going south to Mexico. I can hear Ross say in his southern drawl
today, “It’s time to get out the shovel and clean the barn!”

Have
you heard the latest? On December 20, 2007, the head of Homeland Security,
Michael Chertoff (whose last name in Russian means son of Satan), has
unveiled his $15 billion dollar cyber security program, which will watch
every person from space? In addition to that, the FBI is embarking on
the creation of a single database that is so large it will keep track
of every person in the U.S. and elsewhere in great detail.[1]

Rather
than listen to all the polls and speculations of the media which help
to control the presidential outcome, we could probably ask the chauffeurs
of the limousines who escort these globalists from their private jets
in San Francisco, Oakland or Santa Rosa, California to the Bohemian Grove
on the Russian River north of Santa Rosa for their annual, last two-week
in July rendezvous in the woods worshipping the cultic owl, where they
decide who will be the next president. One driver knew Ronald Reagan was
going to be our next president before the election because he overheard
the discussion in his limousine. Did the same thing happen in July 2007?

In her
book, Naomi Wolf calls it a psychological hangover. She writes, “The men
who risked hanging to found our nation and the women who risked their
own lives to support this experiment in freedom, and who did what they
could to advance it, were terrified of exactly what we call a dictatorship.
They called it ‘tyranny’ or ‘despotism.’ It was the specter at their backs
– and they all knew it – as Americans debated the Constitution and argued
about the shape of the Bill of Rights” and that “The Constitution and
Bill of Rights were set forth not as a flag flying merrily but as a bulwark:
A set of barriers against what the Founders and their fellow country men
and women saw as people’s natural tendency to oppress others if their
power is unchecked…” Of course, it was obvious to the readers she was
referring to President George Bush and compared him to Mussolini, Stalin,
and Hitler – the mantra of many Democrat radio talk show hosts who help
sell her book.

I became
troubled when I read how Naomi equated women with the Founders. While
women have played a significant role in our country, and continue to do
so, do any readers recall seeing the names of any women on the Declaration
of Independence when these 56 signers pledged to give their lives, fortunes
and sacred honor? So I was not surprised to read throughout her book how
Republicans are to blame for what she calls “fascist shifting.” Near the
end she seemed to be calling dissenters, journalists, and elected officials
to “repent.” She compared them to the “hero” (not Savior) of the Conservative
Christian movement, which she described as a powerful political prisoner,
seized by a powerful state (Rome), convicted without a trial and tortured
by military. She admits “students and academics are always democracy’s
foot soldiers” and her “repentance” wasn’t for their sins but fear of
being blackmailed, exposed for their hypocrisy and possibly ending up
in jail themselves.

Gary
Allen, a graduate of Stanford University, author of Communist Revolution
in the Streets and one of the nation’s top authorities on civil turmoil
and the New Left wrote in 1971 about Professor John Kenneth Galbraith
and how Galbraith wanted the Democrat Party to quit pussyfooting around
and proclaim its own adherence to socialism. In his book Who Needs
the Democrats? the Cambridge sage declared: “The Democrat Party must
henceforth use the word socialism.” He knew that in the Communist Manifesto's
Karl Marx made no distinction between socialism and communism. So far,
we've only had Vermont Congressman Bernie Sanders claim
he’s a socialist. [Read] And one of the 45 declared goals of the Communist
Takeover of America was #26: Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity
as “normal, natural, healthy.” [Read]

Advertisement

Just
how far has this country spiritually fallen? In a July 4, 1987, newspaper
article, a story called “History Speaks to U.S.” It quoted Ecclesiastes:
“Remember now thy creator in the days of thy youth, while evil days come
not…” Now we are having caucus meetings in gambling casinos in Nevada
and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Department of Tourism took
out a three –page ad in the Dec/Jan issue of Out Magazine designed
specifically for rich sodomites hoping to draw fifty million visitors
to the city by the year 2015, but especially aiming for this Valentine’s
Day.[2]

I can
remember the time when a certain Tuesday was set-aside in our state. The
voting booths in each precinct were open from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. with paper
ballots and we all assumed our votes were secure and safe, the election
was honest and election officials worked through the night to give the
results for next morning’s newspaper. People left work and went right
to their precincts to vote. (In Oregon, we currently have “vote by mail.”)
The retired ladies recognized us and voting was easy. While waiting in
line, it was a time to visit with others from our precincts, which we
may not have seen since the last election cycle. But today, it’s psychological
warfare with electronic voting in many states with no paper trail and
all the candidates claiming Christianity. Psychology is ecumenism’s final
glue, providing a common anti-Christian religion in America’s apostate
churches and the entire world. No more
absolutes are causing us to become disoriented. Everything is moving
so rapidly.

The
voters who have been watching the records of these candidates over the
years know exactly for whom they will be voting. They sacrificially contribute
to campaigns and we won’t see them in any after-glow undecided focus groups.
On the other side of the coin, we have the jabberwocky of television and
radio commentators and newspaper editors and/or journalists giving their
two cents worth. They demonize candidates like Ron Paul and try to persuade
people how to vote, but maybe the party is over and most don’t even realize
it.

Naomi
recalls during the 1933 purges in Germany, Hitler’s propagandist, Goebbels,
on April 7, 1933, in one day purged the civil service – specially targeting
state attorneys and judges – the baseline measure being “loyalty” and
then reminds us of how President George W. Bush fired nine U.S. attorneys
in March 2007, perhaps with the knowledge of Attorney General Alberto
Gonzales. [Read]
She says Internal Justice Department e-mails indicated they had been targeted
as being insufficiently loyal to White House policies. (Didn’t
President Clinton do the same thing?) Could it be that U.S. attorneys
have the power to decide which voting registration groups should be investigated
and potentially prosecuted? She says, “We assume we can simply throw the
bums out” in 2008. That’s what I’m hearing on the “progressive” radio
talk shows but I often wonder if we’ll even have a 2008 election? And
if so, will it be a fair election? From the way presidential hopefuls
GOP Ron Paul and Democrat Dennis Kucinch have been treated, it makes me
wonder. What if we have another crisis? What if President G.W. Bush declares
martial law?

While
completely ignoring all the other improprieties of Bill and Hillary when
they were co-presidents, like who killed Vince Foster and the 1995 Philippine
Police warnings about some Muslims using airplanes as missiles to fly
into U.S. buildings [3], she asks is it reasonable to assume that leaders
who are willing to abuse signing statements (Executive Orders); withhold
information from Congress; make secret decisions; lie to the American
people; use fake evidence to justify a pre-emptive war; torture prisoners;
tap people’s phones; open their mail and e-mail; break into their houses;
and now simply ignore Congress altogether – leaders with, currently (July
14, 2007) a 29 percent approval rating – will surely say, come 2008, “The
decision rests in the hands of the people. May the votes be fairly counted?”
“If for eight years this group has flouted other equally precious rules
of the democratic game, aren’t we rash to assume that this same group
will see a transparent, fair election as sacrosanct?” she asks and goes
on to add, “The Founders asked us to err on the side of vigilance when
it came to liberty. History and current events around the world – Nigeria,
Turkey, Ukraine, the Philippines – show many examples of leaders in weak
or weakening democracies who were able to ‘co-ordinate’ the civil bureaucracy
with their cronies; (Remember all the Clinton cronie appointments and
pardons?) they then tamper with the vote, and sully the outcome of elections.”

She
says, “At that stage, shock follows shock so quickly that the civil society
institutions start to reel. At this point, in weaker democracies than
ours, the police forces and the army are used to stop dissenters. In any
late shift, the final stage is the establishment of government by emergency
decree or actual martial law and the leader’s assertion – usually using
the law to defend this assertion, that he or she is above the law, or
that he or she is the law: The Decider.” I noticed at one Giuliani rally
there was a sign called “The Decider” but I’m also reminded of Jeremiah
9:17 and Isaiah 3:12 when cunning women rule and even many Democrats seem
fearful of Hillary.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

A few
days ago (January 2008) a story was told on TV that Aurora, Colorado has
rolled out an impenetrable tank-like vehicle with bullet proof windows
and tires that cannot be shot out for the use of local Swat Teams to help
combat crime in America. Those gangs in America must really have our law
enforcement worried -- or are our leaders simply preparing for something
worse?

Betty is a former Oregon Republican party activist
having served as state party secretary, county chairman, 5th congressional
vice chairman and then elected chairman, and a precinct worker for many
years but Betty gave up on the two-party system in 2004 and joined the
Constitutional Party.

I
can remember the time when a certain Tuesday was set-aside in our state.
The voting booths in each precinct were open from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. with
paper ballots and we all assumed our votes were secure and safe, the election
was honest and election officials worked through the night to give the
results for next morning’s newspaper.