<quoted text>Ethiopians are the one that assisted your Cape-Malay people free themselves from Slavery, and kitchen serviceshttp://www.sahistory.org.za/people-south-afri...Your hate targeted against Ethiopians is mainly due to your jealousy, that you are defeated by numerous evidences linking Ethiopians with ancient Hebrew, while you are stranger to the world of Hebrew and your slave history in contrast to the glorious Ethiopian History. You better kill yourself!

Do Indians,Ethiopians look anything like INDIGENOUS MIDDLE EASTERN PEOPLE??? NO? I wonder why? Is it because they have VIRTUALLY NO MIDDLE EASTERN DNA? Hell yes thats exactly why!Photo of an average Chaldean:www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RosieMalek-Yon...Do Ethiopians look like her? Do Indians look like her? No I wonder why! She looks just like an ancient Hebrew in the below link:www.timesofisrael.com/meet-delilah-tv-series-...PEOPLES DO NOT CHANGE THEIR RACE! THEY ARE NOT CHAMELEONS!

Do Modern Jews look anything like middle eastern? Actually no!, but they are much closer to the ancient Hebrew than the Cape-Malay slaves. Despite your tireless support, they never supported you here. Do you know why? They know you are black and always at their service. Be sure, 100%, they hate you!

<quoted text>India is the only Eastern Asian country with deep rooted Hebrew culture, but it was via the Arebian pensula via Yemen. There was strong trade relation between India and ancient Yemen, and I believe Indian, Yemenite and Ethiopian shared the authentic Hebrew.

West Africa is also very deep roots in Hebrew culture! Does that make them related to Middle Eastern people? Oh hell no!

Do Indians,Ethiopians look anything like INDIGENOUS MIDDLE EASTERN PEOPLE??? NO? I wonder why? Is it because they have VIRTUALLY NO MIDDLE EASTERN DNA? Hell yes thats exactly why!Photo of an average Chaldean:www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RosieMalek-Yon...Do Ethiopians look like her? Do Indians look like her? No I wonder why! She looks just like an ancient Hebrew in the below link:www.timesofisrael.com/meet-delilah-tv-series-...PEOPLES DO NOT CHANGE THEIR RACE! THEY ARE NOT CHAMELEONS!

I told u that u albinos some were barbarians and some were out in the farms with black farmers (all togather speaking summer). They are associated by language and participation. But everyone still shares same root, so there were white neolithic farmers, but blacks were the first man and first to over populate everywhere.

<quoted text>Do Modern Jews look anything like middle eastern? Actually no!, but they are much closer to the ancient Hebrew than the Cape-Malay slaves. Despite your tireless support, they never supported you here. Do you know why? They know you are black and always at their service. Be sure, 100%, they hate you!

People TALK SO MUCH CR*P ON THIS SITE> Everywhere in the world people are the same race they always were. The ancient Middle Eastern people WERE THE EXACT SAME RACE THEY ARE TODAY AND CARRY THE EXACT SAME HAPLOGROUPS! The indigenous Israel people, the Samaritans carry exactly the same Haplogroups their ancient ancestors, the Israelites carried. They ARE NOT related to Indians or Ethiopians but to other indigenous Middle Eastern people!

Only people born with genetic errors assume people never move. Cape-Malay slaves are brought from Malaysia to Africa in 18th century, yet they cluster with West African today. Does it mean Cape-Malays descended from West Africa? Actually no. Since there was shortage of white Deutsche woman, the Cape Malays were mixed with West African descent Zulu, to result a son like you, confusing people as if you are Ashkenazim. Fu*ck! You are most black of blacks!

<quoted text>West Africa is also very deep roots in Hebrew culture! Does that make them related to Middle Eastern people? Oh hell no!

I admit they are closer as compared with the Alien cultured Cape-Malay men, like you! You don't even notice that west Africa is much closer to the middle east rather than Indonesia! You are illiterate and luck the basic logic of human movement.

I wonder why you can have anything related with Ethiopia! There has to be some link or bad luck in your daily life. It is my first time to know Cape Malay slaves, and felt they are the only people, not free of mental slavery today.

Are you all here still debating on the dead issue "Who were ancient Hebrews". I thought it is already concluded that none of you here are not a bit related to the true ancient Hebrews.Ethiopia, not only have scripture backed evidences, or not just linguistic, genetics or cultural evidences, but we have most live and realistic archeological evidence.The Sabean Inscription at Addi-Kaweh, Northern Ethiopia, dated 800 B.C. The Subjects of the ancient D'mt Kingdom, as clearly written on the two incense burners were 'Sb' and 'Br' to mean read and the black people, the latter to mean 'Hebrew' or one that crossed over/passed, in the ancient Sabean language. Only consonants were used in the ancient Semitic Language. The earliest mention of the people of 'Br' in the world is this sabean inscription.http://www.academia.edu/257415/THE_SABAEAN_IN...The problem is, this land is not located today at the center of the middle east and racists are desperate and frustrated to hide this actual fact. Hebrew were initially black people that later occupied passed to the red sea, closer to the direction of today's Djibouti. There you will find the true location of mount Seni and also mount of Jithro. Later they moved to west and northAlso, the land of Misir is not today's Egypt but in Yemen where the Hebrews were Captives.

<quoted text>Ethiopians are the one that assisted your Cape-Malay people free themselves from Slavery, and kitchen serviceshttp://www.sahistory.org.za/people-south-afri...Your hate targeted against Ethiopians is mainly due to your jealousy, that you are defeated by numerous evidences linking Ethiopians with ancient Hebrew, while you are stranger to the world of Hebrew and your slave history in contrast to the glorious Ethiopian History. You better kill yourself!

i think ethiopian related groups represented a major demographic in the hebrew community. but the problem i have with my ethiopian brother is his insistance that west african types were completely isolated from the biblical narrative and theatre when all the facts (as presented in this thread) would suggest otherwise.

You are dare to talk about DNA, which is much advanced to you. You don't even know your own history, the Cape-Malay slavery! Probably, you don't even know who your father was! I know how bad was slavery, and yet you pretend as if you forgot all that. Ask, your mother, she will tell who your father was!

<quoted text>i think ethiopian related groups represented a major demographic in the hebrew community. but the problem i have with my ethiopian brother is his insistance that west african types were completely isolated from the biblical narrative and theatre when all the facts (as presented in this thread) would suggest otherwise.

I believe information is power, and I always need to learn. I hate people fixed in one position, despite reliable evidences linked to them. These people are here, mainly for their fear and jealousy. I never conclude one issue but I request evidences. Let's dig more on this issue and grasp valuable knowledge and ignore non-sense posts

<quoted text>Ethiopians are the one that assisted your Cape-Malay people free themselves from Slavery, and kitchen serviceshttp://www.sahistory.org.za/people-south-afri...Your hate targeted against Ethiopians is mainly due to your jealousy, that you are defeated by numerous evidences linking Ethiopians with ancient Hebrew, while you are stranger to the world of Hebrew and your slave history in contrast to the glorious Ethiopian History. You better kill yourself!

i think ethiopian related groups represented a major demographic in the hebrew community. but the problem i have with my ethiopian brother is his insistance that west african types were completely isolated from the biblical narrative and theatre when all the facts (as presented in this thread) would suggest otherwise.

you just called AE a hater for denying ethiopians, which is why i say you hate on e1b1a, cuz you do the same thing.

@glimmer; UNLOCKING Ancient Mystries for you.Summer and Suba (Ethiopia's ancient language) are same words in west Africa.They are languages and means Speak!

the Levi of Sumatran today and Ethiopians share common haplotype, descent of the EM-35. Nile Vally is the source for the Sumatran people who also shared much of the J haplotype in Ethiopia. Recently, the most indigenous East African people, called Omotic carried as much as 52% of the parent clad-J, which was quite un-expected. Semites may not be indigenous but haplotype J was in Africa in the last 17,000 years.

COMING TO ANCIENT AINIONITHCA (Aethiopia/Africa);The entire peoples of the land were an angelic race.the white colonialists came and told us that our Judaism was paganism.Jesus said that once anyone is an angel the person doesn't need to marry, but can procreate with ANY other angel!SEE;"A GLIMPS INTO THE ANCIENT JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIOPIAN SEXUAL PRACTISES......IN THIS LINK[http://janetius.page.tl/UniqueCulturalPractice.htm], IT IS WRITTEN......"Oncethe marriage is over, the younger brothers of the bridegroom is free tohave sex with the wife of their newly married brother. The word ‘warsa’means this act of sexual intercourse between the girl and her husband’syounger brothers."IN THIS LINK[ http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/arabia... ], YOU WILL FIND THIS............."A man's brothers are held in more respect than his children. The descendants of the royal family succeed as kings, and are invested with other governments, according to primogeniture. Property is common among all the relations. The eldest is the chief. There is one wife among them all. He who enters the house before any of the rest, has intercourse with her having placed his staff at the door; for it is a necessary custom which every one is compelled to observe, to carry a staff. The woman, however, passes the night with the eldest. Hence the male children are all brothers. They have sexual intercourse also with their mothers. Adultery is punished with death, but an adulterer must belong to another family. "http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb....http://robt.shepherd.tripod.com/spiritual-afr...

Continued:THE ABOLITION OF EXCHANGE MARRIAGE:Exchange marriage was abolished on 15th July 1927 following a councilmeeting of District Heads at Abinsi with the British colonialadministration. It was substituted with the kem system of marriage.Though, the impression is created in colonial sources that the abolitionwas a consensus decision of the District Heads, it is clear that it wasactually a conspiracy by the colonial administration and the missionarybodies operating in Tivland – especially the Dutch Reformed ChurchMission (DRCM).For while the colonial administration wanted to transform traditionalsocio-economic structures to align with the objectives of the colonialenterprise (see Atagher 2001). The missionaries claimed that exchangemarriage had advanced immorality and was making it difficult for theiryounger converts to marry when they wished to. Thus finding a meetingpoint and getting the support of the youths whose eyes were beginning toopen to the opportunities of the cash economy, every tactic includingblackmail and intimidation was used to secure the elders “support” for theabolition. This point is underscored by the fact that just before the Abinsicouncil meeting, Tor Ugba was arrested and exiled to far away Kadunadue to some minor infraction. No District Head could therefore hope tooppose the proposal for abolition and return to his domain, not when therewere reports of “strange vehicles” at the venue of the meeting and threatsby those close to the administration that elders opposed to the abolitionwould be hoarded in the vehicles and taken into exile.www.google.com/search... .+

<quoted text>I believe information is power, and I always need to learn. I hate people fixed in one position, despite reliable evidences linked to them. These people are here, mainly for their fear and jealousy. I never conclude one issue but I request evidences. Let's dig more on this issue and grasp valuable knowledge and ignore non-sense posts

you've only ignored factual proof that e1b1a types had a role in the biblical narrative. this information has been presented over and over by several posters, while you continue to come back with 'i need proof'. sorry bruh, but you the equivalent of AE where e1b1a is concerned. you simply aren't moved by the facts cuz you be hating on e1b1a.

According to Basden (1966), sexual relationship was free and children born during the process became a welcome relief, as a mark of prayer answered by Aja ala deity. But in as much as life style became free; there was a limit to which one exercised ones freedom. Hence, the following were regarded as taboos:(i) Any man or woman who indulged in sexual acts and failed to work the next day was compelled to pay with a fine of a fowl.(ii) Women menstruating were not allowed to come very close to the building site, rather they were secluded at a corner of the enclosure because they were regarded as profane. After the period, they must purify themselves by washing and performing certain ablution sacrifices, using eggs before they could resume work.

TRUST THE DEVILISH ROMANS AND THEIR WITCH HUNTS, THEY CAME HERE AND DESTABILIZED EVERYWHERE, TO THE POINT THAT SCHOLARS ARE EVEN WRITING ON THE WEB THAT IGBOS PRACTICED CELIBACY!

THEY WENT TO ETHIOPIA AND TRIED VERY HARD TO STOP THE PRIESTS FROM GETTING MARRIED, BUT THE ETHIOPIANS REFUSED BECAUSE THEY WERE MORE INTERNATIONAL!!!!!! MORE AWARE!!!

If we keep all these refinements in mind, the question that confronts us is, were Onitsha, Anambra, Njikoka and Awka patriarchal societies at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century as Basden, Thomas and Meek claimed? Did they possess a society-wide system of male domination? I argue that they did not. At the societal level, the intricate nature of Igbo social relations is such that men and women were not in a superordinate/subordinate position. At the family level, which is the focus of this examination, the family system of organization together with its extensive diffusions of rights, powers and obligation between the sexes, mothers and fathers, and in-laws was antithetical to the sort of familial and societal relations that patriarchy prescribed. Indeed to have been a patriarchal system, these Igbo communities would have required four additional key features. These are: (1) the concentration of powers in the hands of men over women as a group; (2) the division of a society into public and private spaces; (3) the domestication and exploitation of women, including the control of their sexual and reproductive powers and their restriction to the private space of the home; and (4) the systemic devaluation of women. All these features were absent in Igbo societies prior to colonization. However, in the face of massive Igbo women’s opposition in the first quarter of the twentieth century,[15] all four features were subsequently injected into Igboland through missionary activities, colonial laws and policies, and the Western mode of education.ALSO FROM THE SAME LINK;

The construal of family/lineage as squarely under the rule of a patriarch contains an element of ambiguity that undermines the idea that historically Igbo families had always been patrilineal and patriarchal. The ambiguity does not simply lie, as readers of Felicia Ekejiuba’s concept of hearth-hold may assume, at the absence of a passive, dependent wife whose primary role is the provision of sexual and housekeeping services to a husband. Rather, it lies in the constitution of the Igbo family, the notion of a father, and the idea that the lineage or the father line of descent may be broken and sutured with the help of another bloodline. The idea of breakage and suturing means that the father may not be the genitor or biological father of his so-called progeny, but a non-family member, an outsider. What then does it mean for a father to be a nongenitor? And what implications does this nongenitor role have for the concept of patriliny, and of family and social formations?