After more than a two-year hiatus, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is once again renewing licenses for aging nuclear power plants.

The independent federal agency gave a 20-year license renewal on Oct. 20 to Limerick Generating Station Units 1 and 2 near Philadelphia and is now reviewing renewal applications for 17 additional reactors, including Indian Point Unit 2 that’s located on the Hudson River about 24 miles north of New York City.

The NRC, which licenses commercial nuclear power plants for a period of 40 years, has granted 20-year extensions to 74 of the 100 operating reactors in the United States, many of which were nearing the end of their licenses. No reactor has yet sought a second license extension. These commercial plants, which are on average 33 years old, generate about 20% of U.S. electricity.

A federal court limited the NRC’s authority to renew licenses in June 2012, after the Obama administration ended a long-term plan to store commercial nuclear waste at a repository in Nevada’s Yucca Mountain.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the NRC should have considered the environmental consequences of never building a permanent repository. It struck down provisions of the NRC Waste Confidence Rule, which allows the agency to renew licenses without studying the effects of long-term storage for each site. The NRC makes license renewal partly contingent on a plant’s safe disposal of highly radioactive waste, which occurs mostly onsite in spent fuel pools or dry casks.

Map from EIA

As a result, in August 2012, the NRC issued an order to suspend license renewals, but the nuclear power industry continued to submit applications. On Sept. 18, in a unanimous decision that cleared the way for the issuance of new licenses or renewals, it said nuclear waste from power plants could be stored indefinitely in above-ground containers.

Environmental groups balked at NRC’s decision and on Wednesday, 10 filed separate lawsuits to challenge it in court. “The NRC disregarded the explicit direction of the D.C. Circuit to examine the environmental impacts of indefinite storage of spent nuclear fuel in the event there is no repository,” said Geoffrey Fettus, senior attorney of the Natural Resources Defense Group, which filed its own appeal.“This lawsuit simply requests the Court send the agency back to do the job it should have done in the first instance,” he said.

Earlier in the week, on Monday, the states of New York, Connecticut and Vermont filed a similar lawsuit.

The NRC’s license renewal for Limerick, which occurred the same day that its new waste decision became effective, will allow Unit 1 to operate until 2044 and Unit 2 until 2049. Exelon Corporation, which operates the Limerick plant, said it has invested $500 in the last five years to modernize operations.

Indian Point Unit 2’s current license expired in September 2013. The NRC allows reactors to continue operating if they applied for renewal five years before their license expires.

Comments

wether or not you support nuclear power, its important we maintain and ensure the aging ones are given the proper treatment!

Rudy

United States

October 31, 2014, 8:16 pm

It’s unbelievable how we can somehow believe that nuclear energy is safe after the still-leaking, still-contaminating, still-threatening all of mankind disaster in Japan. Ours are worn out, we don’t have a way to safely store the “spent” rods, and a US calamity is merely a matter of time. Maybe energy companies don’t need to make billions of dollars any more. Maybe it should be free.

About This Blog

National Geographic is no longer updating this blog. For the latest energy coverage, visit the Great Energy Challenge .