The power of the initiative petition, when mixed with aggressive litigation, could drive meaningful election reform, regardless of the dynamics of national politics or the extent of infestation in the state houses. Where the initiative option is available, it should be used as a tool of democracy.

...and here is David kicking ass and, literally, taking names...Read the story of this little but effective group taking on the criminal dealings of Nevada's Secretary of State and his big balls....

I'm not surprized by their actions. Even here in oh-so-blue MA, the legislature really hates it when the voters decide something by referendum. In fact, they have completely defied some referendum in the past.

Moreover, medical marijuana, and even some downright broadbased decriminalization measures, have been winning local "advisory" referendum here over the last six years in district after district after district. These aren't legally binding, but they do take any excuse away from the legislators that their "local constituents would crucify" them if they supported such measures. Aside from a few of the better congresscritters standing up and helping bills along, and a few private, "yeah, I'm with you personally"'s from several, the support we've seen has been abysmal so far.

So much for "we want to hear from our constituents". Not if they say something that they don't want to hear, I guess.

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.