We've run into a glitch with this document. The second page does not appear to belong with the first page. The infant on the first page is said to be of masculine sex; the infant on the second page appears to be feminine-given the name Rosa and referred to as a neonata (female newborn). The other thing is that the person on the second page who produced the two witnesses is not the same person as the father on the first page and this name should be the same.