BACKGROUND: The U.S. District Court of Appeals in Washington
D.C. has voted 2-1 that the U.S. EPA overstepped its power in
implementing what's called the "Haze Rule." In 1999,
the EPA's Haze Rule imposed emissions controls on power plants
in several states after the EPA claimed air pollution from these
plants drifts into national parks. The court ruled that EPA could
not force the plants to install pollution control equipment without
"empirical evidence" that individual plants were contributing
to the haze.

TEN SECOND RESPONSE: Once again the Clinton Administration's
EPA made rules that would have cost millions of dollars without
using sound science.

THIRTY SECOND RESPONSE: States rights were upheld by
this decision. The court reminded the EPA that the law doesn't
allow all parties to be penalized just because one party is guilty.
Only those facilities that contribute to the haze should be required
to install new equipment -- not those that are not responsible.

DISCUSSION: The Court pointed out "that Congress
intended the states to decide what sources impair visibility"
and what "Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) should
apply to those sources." EPA must now revise the Haze Rule
to allow states to exempt those facilities that do not contribute
to air pollution in the parks.

by Gretchen Randall, Director
John P. McGovern, MD Center for Environmental and Regulatory Affairs
The National Center for Public Policy Research