Jews Menaced by Comic Book

Bursting into the wealthy house where the bris for baby Glick Sacks is being held, the Monster Mohel and his scowling Orthodox thugs clutching automatic weapons look just like real-life religious fanatics.

Grinning evilly, the Monster Mohel demands, “Where is the child?”

In his artistic rendering—for this is a scene from San Diegan Matthew Hess’s anti-circumcision comic book Monster Mohel (2010)—the villain reflects in his external features internal Jewish evil. (Though written and edited by Hess, the artist is a Brazilian freelancer named Gledson Baretto, who works by commission.)

Because Sarah (the impliedly Gentile wife) had been promised by her Jewish husband that baby Glick would not be circumcised, she asks what this means.

“Oh, please Sarah,” the swarthy bastard sneers. “Did you really think I was going to deprive our son of his Jewish heritage? Glick will be circumcised the same way I was and that’s that. You’ll just have to live with it.”

But one guest, über-Aryan Miles Hastwick, corporate scientist, inconspicuously slips away from the rest and transforms, Superman-like, into Foreskin Man, a superhero who battles circumcisers with the aid of plasma rocket boots and superhuman strength. San Diego’s island-based Museum of Genital Integrity, which Hastwick heads, conceals Foreskin Man’s underground chamber, from which he ventures forth to battle evil.

(A literal-minded reader, missing both the crusading point of the comic and its alleged anti-Semitism, was unimpressed: “All the hype of the name ‘Foreskin Man’ leads to quite a disappointing read when you realize Foreskin Man doesn’t have any sort of powers relating to his foreskin. It should grow out of him and wrap around opponents or shoot lazers or SOMETHING. I’m sure this would be pretty disgusting to draw but hey, it would be a hell of a lot more interesting.”)

As the mohel intones “Thank thee, O Lord, for the joyous metzitzah b’peh for which I am about to partake,” rugged, blond Foreskin Man, readying his attack, thinks, “That’s it, Monster. Keep babbling.”

After decking the mohel with an eight ball to the head and evil henchman Yerik with the heavy end of a pool cue (“Lights out!”), Foreskin Man kidnaps little hybrid Glick and delivers him to the Intactivist Underground for safekeeping: “We will raise him as one of our own.”

By the seaside at dusk, joined by Foreskin Man, members of the Underground set a wooden structure ablaze in a scene reminiscent of a KKK cross lighting. Circumstraints have been attached to the frame, which is constructed in the shape of a shield displaying the phallic Intactivist Underground symbol, and it burns against a darkening sky.

“‘Foreskin Man,’ with its grotesque anti-Semitic imagery and themes,” the ADL monotonously intones in its press release condemning Hess’s comic book, “reaches a new low and is disrespectful and deeply offensive.”

Mysterious Author

Monster Mohel, which has made international waves, is Issue No. 2 (of two) in the self-published Foreskin Man comic book series.

“I’ve been a fan of comic books since before I could even read the words in them, so I wanted the art to be at least as good as the story,” author Matthew Hess said.

William Pierce, the founder of the National Alliance, likewise experimented with the comic book medium with New World Order Comix No. 1, The Saga of . . . White Will! (1993). (YouTube, 4 mins. YouTube, a subsidiary of Jewish Internet giant Google, censors pro-white content when it discovers it. It works in conjunction with the ADL, a powerful Jewish hate group, and a network of YouTube informants. This video has been removed in the past.)

Active (or Intactive) in the anti-circumcision movement since 2002, Hess wrote a statutory ban of the practice and sought a state legislator anywhere to sponsor it. Last year Massachusetts State Sen. Michael Morrissey agreed. Hess helped enlist seventeen witnesses to testify in favor of the ban, but the bill was killed in committee.

On his MySpace webpage, New York-born Hess, 42, describes himself as “married,” “straight,” and “White/Caucasian”—a self-identification which does not absolutely preclude his being Jewish. According to news reports he was circumcised as an infant.

Media sources have been unforthcoming about Hess’s racial/religious background.

One unnamed “Jewish affairs advocate,” “who wasn’t speaking in an official capacity,” told a reporter,

We have not uncovered any kind of bigotry in their backgroundor anything like that. That said, it seems that they are so fanatical in the belief of their cause that they are just either willfully blind or willfully ignorant to the fact that they have stooped to trafficking in these really hateful tropes. (Emphasis added.)

The machinery that enables Jewry to “investigate” in this manner and do much else besides is sinister in the extreme. It renders the United States and other ex-white countries unfree and anti-democratic.

Seeks Ban

As noted, Matthew Hess seeks a legal ban on infant circumcision. Jews are enraged that he obtained the 7,100 signatures necessary to place his proposal on the San Francisco ballot in November.

Hess writes:

MGMbill.org [Male Genital Mutilation Bill] is a private non-profit organization based in San Diego, California, seeking to pass a law that will end the practice of male genital mutilation (circumcision) in the United States of America. Currently, girls are protected from genital mutilation by U.S. federal law, but boys are not. Although legal protection of only girls from circumcision would seem to violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the fact remains that it is still widely considered to be legal in this country to mutilate a boy’s genitals in the name of social custom, hygiene, religion, or any other reason. This is true despite the well documented lifelong damage that male circumcision causes each of its victims. It’s a practice we need to end now.

Hess is not alone in his opposition to the primitive ritual. Days ago screen star Russell Crowe blasted circumcision. (He’s groveling mightily now to shed the “anti-Semitic” label that was immediately pinned to him.) According to the New York Times, 30%-50% of male infants in the US are still being circumcised.

How a Narrative is Constructed

"Foreskin Man" creator Matthew Hess

The public was alerted to the latest “Nazi” threat to the Jews (i.e., Foreskin Man), as near as I can tell, by a neoconservative syndicated columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle, Debra J. Saunders, on June 2, 2011.

It seems that pulverizing foreign countries and killing their heads of state, murdering and torturing Palestinians, persecuting people like Demjanjuk for decades on end, suppressing speech, and manipulating the political process doesn’t keep Jews fully occupied.

In its reporting, the New York Times struck a melodramatic pose reminiscent of the winsome female hysterics in Charcot’s old photographs from the Salpêtrière: “If the anticircumcision activists have their way, cities across the country may be voting on whether to criminalize” the practice.

Jewish groups see the ballot measures [there was briefly a second one in Santa Monica that has already been pulled] as a very real threat, likening them to bans on circumcision that existed in Soviet-era Russia and Eastern Europe and in ancient Roman and Greek times. Checking for circumcision was one of the ways Jewish children could be culled from their peers by Nazis and the czar’s armies. “People are shocked that it has reached this level” said Marc Stern, associate general counsel for the American Jewish Committee.

Yeah, right.

The uproar over Monster Mohel and the San Francisco ballot measure is a case study of how contemporary narratives, stories, and social constructions are invented and peddled to the masses.

The objective phenomenon of Jews ruthlessly stomping an inconsequential local citizen initiative and one self-published comic book into the ground is translated via narcissistic self-absorption and the megaphone of the mass media into a virtual pogrom: Jews nationally menaced by blond anti-Semites!

Among the media outlets and pundits that have sanctimoniously blown the story out of proportion, discrediting their objectivity and credibility and revealing their tenuous relationship to reality, are the San FranciscoChronicle, the San FranciscoExaminer, the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, metro ABC and CBS television outlets, Southern California Public Radio, the San Diego Union-Tribune, the ADL, the American Jewish Committee, Commentary magazine, the Jewish Journal, Heeb, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA), the Jerusalem Post, Haaretz (Israel), David Frum, the Wall Street Journal, the John Birch Society’s New American magazine, WorldNetDaily, Glenn Beck, South Dakota Politics, Huffington Post, The Globe and Mail (Canada), The Week (UK), the Daily Mail (London), and the Herald Sun (Australia). The neoconservative-Christian First Things, founded by philo-Semitic Roman Catholic priest Richard John Neuhaus, is demanding ostracism and censorship.

A Sober Assessment

Jews and powerful media outlets assure a rapt international audience that Hess’s measure to “criminalize” circumcision will be on the San Francisco ballot this November.

Yet their cries of “anti-Semitism” have already scotched a similar measure (also written by Hess) in Santa Monica, California. Jena Troutman, its blonde sponsor, caved in immediately to the pressure. Which is understandable. Who wants to be beaten to a pulp by America’s crazed Al Capone with his baseball bat?

Given the realities of Jewish power, it seems likely the San Francisco initiative will likewise never see the light of day.

Nevertheless, follow the logic.

First, the measure would have to actually pass in the face of opposition from all media outlets, Jewish organizations, and politicians. Jews have already mobilized. According to the Washington Times, “Jewish groups have joined with legal professionals, doctors and elected officials in opposing the measure through the recently formed Committee for Parental Choice and Religious Freedom.” (“Choice” and “religious freedom.” I like that. Did Mel Gibson have them?)

Second, Jews aren’t known for obeying laws. They do what they please. Laws are for lesser folk not “chosen” by God, a position tacitly endorsed by the legal system. If the measure passed, Jews could flaunt it and bask in the “persecution” limelight.

Third, the ordinance would face ultra-expensive legal hurdles.

Fourth, local authorities would actually have to enforce the ban and prosecute violators. (They don’t enforce immigration laws.)

Fifth, the proposed penalty is a $1,000 fine or a year in jail—a misdemeanor.

Finally, those inclined to obey the law, if any, could step across the municipal line and legally perform the Stone Age ritual outside city limits.

As for the comic book, when have Jews, liberals, or conservatives ever supported freedom of speech?

In his defense, Hess enigmatically promises that Issue No. 3 will “deal with a different kind of circumcision,” implying either a move back to political correctness or possibly forward to African tribal circumcision as hinted at in Issue No. 1, Dr. Mutilator (2010).

34 Comments

Damn heebs really are bat shit crazy. Jews aren’t used to people not groveling. Any group that would demand federal legislation in response to a local ballot measure and a comic book WILL use a Sampson option.

What did you mean in your trailer that “They hate us because we are blond”?

Foreskin Man is being subjected to what I feel are racist comments about his Aryan/Nordic appearance. You don’t need to look hard to find those remarks in the press, and the underlying suggestion is that because Foreskin Man has blond hair, he is obviously a Nazi who is bent on destroying Jewish identity. I reject that connotation. Foreskin Man and his alter ego Miles Hastwick are reflective of my own German heritage, and I make no apologies for that. I am proud of who I am. And Foreskin Man is not at war with all Jews any more than he is at war with all doctors. Rather, he is at war with circumcisers who cut children by force. In the first issue the villain is a doctor, and in the second issue the villain is a mohel. Those are the two most common types of circumcisers in the United States. In the third issue of Foreskin Man the focus will be on a different type of circumcision.

What do you hope to gain by engaging in what most people consider to be anti-Jewish imagery and accusations?

As I stated earlier, the images in Foreskin Man #2 are not anti-Jewish any more than the images in Foreskin Man #1 are anti-doctor. Rather, they are anti-mutilation of children. But I admit that the images were intentionally designed to provoke people. The Foreskin Man comics are an attempt to reach people at an emotional level – which is where our true humanity lies.

* * * *

I also highly recommend that anyone interested take a look at Heeb’s take on Hess’s short video trailer for Issue No. 3. Their page includes the trailer, but if they remove it you can watch it on the Foreskin Man website. Heeb resents the fact that Hess explicitly points out the blatant anti-white racism of the circumcisionist censors!

Issue No. 3 of Foreskin Man has just been released. Miles Hastwick teams up with Negress Vulva Girl to combat female genital mutilation in Africa.

The press release:

Foreskin Man and Vulva Girl Team Up to Battle Circumcision in Africa
>PRWEB.COM Newswire

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) June 29, 2011

Just in time for summer, the third issue of MGMbill.org’s hotly debated Foreskin Man comic book series was released to fans today. The latest installment takes readers on an overseas adventure to East Africa and marks the introduction of Vulva Girl, Foreskin Man’s female counterpart.

When a worried mother fears that her son has been kidnapped to be circumcised, Miles Hastwick departs on an expedition to a remote Kenyan village to search for the boy. Miles soon learns that Africa is a far different place than America, and even his alter ego Foreskin Man will need help if he is going to survive his most dangerous and complex mission yet.

Foreskin Man #3 is written by Matthew Hess and combines the talents of two commissioned artists for the illustrations. Hess is president of MGMbill.org, an intactivist group pushing for federal, state, and local laws that would protect boys from medically unnecessary circumcision the same way that girls are protected.

“I think everyone has met at least one person who believes that circumcising girls should be a crime, but circumcising boys is okay,” said Hess. “They’ll agree wholeheartedly that female circumcision is ‘mutilation’, but will insist that male circumcision is only a ‘modification’. The idea behind Foreskin Man #3 is to expose that double standard and help persuade readers that male and female circumcision are really two sides of the same coin.”

“Despite significant progress being made to eradicate it, genital cutting of girls is still far too common,” said Hess. “I wanted to create a superhero who would fight against female circumcision, too, and so I dreamed up Vulva Girl. With the Siri Amulet as her energy source, Vulva Girl uses the power of flight and psychokinesis to help her confront Africa’s most notorious female circumcisers.”

Back in the USA, Foreskin Man is unleashing an angry tidal wave of legal action. Earlier this month Rep. Brad Sherman told the Jewish Journal that the Foreskin Man comic books pushed him to introduce a bill in Congress to prevent U.S. cities from banning forced circumcision of boys. The next day California State Assemblyman Mike Gatto promised to introduce a similar state measure, saying he had to “rub his eyes” after reading the Foreskin Man comics. The Anti-Defamation League added more fuel to the fire when they filed a joint lawsuit in the San Francisco County Superior Court of California to pull Hess’s San Francisco MGM Bill from the November 2011 ballot. Foreskin Man #2 and Foreskin Man trading cards 1 – 18 are marked as “Exhibit A” in a supportive declaration for case #CPF-11-511370 filed by Morrison & Foerster LLP, the plaintiffs’ attorneys.

Foreskin Man #3 is available to read and download for free at http://www.foreskinman.com. Printed copies may also be purchased online, or by ordering through a local comic book shop.

This incident is an excellent example of Jewish swarming tactics. The Jews attack real and perceived enemies like a swarm of bees. They probably do this more by instinct than by conspiracy. As Israel Shamir remarked: “[T]he Jews have no obvious leaders who create a single strategy, no headquarters or central command. It is hard to swallow that the Jews can have a strategy but no strategist; and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are popular precisely because they posit such a supreme (if obscure) strategist. However, ‘the locusts have no king, yet but they attack in formation’ (Proverbs 30:27) and devastate whole countries as if by plan.” By themselves, individual Jews would for the most part be unpleasant but harmless cranks, but collectively they are extremely dangerous.

This is significant because Bloomerg is not only a major media enterprise in the US, but possibly the most influential one among America’s financial elite. Its billionaire owner, a Jew, is currently the 10th wealthiest American and 30th wealthiest in the world.

The newly-formed circumcision front group “Committe for Parental Choice and Freedom” may be the creature of San Francisco’s Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC).

A leader of the circumcisers is California State Senator Mark Leno (D.), who, despite his Italian-sounding surname, is a homosexual Jew from Wisconsin. In an accompanying audio clip, he claims that Hess’s Monster Mohel is “literally culled from Nazi literature.” He provides no evidence for this reckless charge. I assume he and his cohorts simply made it up.

The Bloomberg article provides better data on US circumcision rates than did the New York Times article, which was very misleading. 79% of adult US males are circumcised; the rate among newborns is 55% (as of 2005) according to the Centers for Disease Control.

The huge influx of non-white immigrants in recent years presumably played a big part in the drop.

The organized anticirc crusade would want you to believe that the rather large drop in rate of newborn circumcision occurred as a result of their efforts. But as you say, the influx of nonwhite immigrants would probably account for this.

The article can be analyzed from a variety of perspectives, as well as for the manipulative techniques employed. Homosexuals, like Irish Americans, and unlike all other white groups save politically-correct ideological ones (e.g., feminists), have a quasi-independent power base, so Jewish manipulation of them is interesting to observe. Like the Irish, homosexuals on balance serve Jewish interests.

It turns out that the sponsor of the San Francisco measure, Lloyd Schofield, is a homosexual. Although he refuses to publicly identify himself as such, the Jews have helpfully done so. I assume their motivation in outing him is to place the onus for the measure on homosexuals as a group, while simultaneously rendering Schofield persona non grata among them.

Schofield, who is not Jewish, “wouldn’t disavow Hess or his comic book”—indicating that this is high on the Jewish agenda, as always.

Divide and conquer. Ostracize, ostracize, ostracize.

And they have made progress: “Schofield told ABC 7 News on June 7 that he ‘believes the comic book goes too far.’ ‘It’s inflammatory and 180 degrees different from the direction that we wanted to go in and I could understand completely why people [he really means Jews] would be offended. That’s why we never used them on our website,’ Schofield told Carolyn Tyler, ABC 7 News reporter.” (Emphasis added.)

One of the commenters, Stephen Mendelsohn (“works at Chai Mitzvah”) says, “I am the person who found Foreskin Man on the internet over six months ago and have been trying to expose this hate ever since.”

Mendelsohn may have brought the comic book to the attention of organized Jewry, but as far as I know San Francisco columnist Debra Saunders was the first to write about it publicly two weeks ago, thereby sparking the international media frenzy.

Lew, yes ridicule, I got that too. As soon as the word got out he’d become the whipping boy and laughing stock of the whole school. He’d never have any friends or fit in anywhere. His life would be an unbearable hell on earth.

I was told that because of the constant infections uncircumcised males are prone to, everyone would know because he’d smell bad. Sexually he’d never function normally and likely end up sterile. Needless to say, no woman would ever want him. I was dooming him to a life of loneliness, childlessness, and pathological isolation. I imagined him as a grown man sitting alone in the dark with a whiskey bottle in one hand and a loaded gun in the other ready to blow his brains out.

I was told to think about “what’s best for him and not what I wanted.” As he got older he’d grow to hate me. He’d turn to me as a young man and ask “why did you do this to me?”

He’d beg to get circumcised. But it was explained to me that what is normally a simple, quickly forgotten procedure becomes an increasingly complex, traumatic, even dangerous operation as boys get older. The older he got the greater the pain and the healing process takes much longer. By the time he’s sexually mature the problems, physically and psychologically, can have increased to the point it’s too late and the damage is irreversible.

I could go on. I was lectured every day by an increasingly higher medical authority and given written materials with illustrations to read. Being innocent of the JQ, I had no idea what I was up against. I explained over and over again, “NO. We’re NOT Jewish. We don’t HAVE to get circumcised.”

Of course, none of the nightmare scenarios ever materialized. Looking back I wonder what’s behind the insidious effort to push MGM on non-jews.

Readers with a streak of Schadenfreude might be amused by the following excerpts from Allen Edwardes’ Erotica Judaica: A Sexual History of the Jews (New York: The Julian Press, 1967), pp. 214-216:

The term ‘Curlicism’ for ‘literary indecency’ derived from one Edmund Curll, notorious London printer and bookseller, who was convicted (1728) of producing such tarnished gems as A Nun in Her Smock and De Usu Flagrorum (On Passionate Practices). When Curll accused Alexander Pope of being one of his accomplices in pornology, the monumental bard countered with this lampoon:

A strange but true Relation how Mr. Edmund Curll of Fleet-street, Stationer, out of an Extraordinary Desire of Lucre, went into ‘Change-alley, and was converted from the Christian Religion by certain eminent Jews; and how he was circumcised, and initiated into their Mysteries.

. . . Now our young men are turned usurers and stockjobbers; and, instead of lusting after the real wives and daughters of our rich citizens, they covet nothing but their money and estates. Strange change of vice! when the concupiscence of youth is converted into the covetousness of age, and those appetites are now become venal which should be venereal. . . .

Who can then wonder . . . that Mr. Edmund Curll the stationer should renounce the Christian religion for the Mammon of unrighteousness, and barter his precious faith for the filthy prospect of lucre in the present fluctuation of stocks? . . . .

Whereupon falling into company with the Jews at the club at the sign of Cross in Cornhill, they . . . promised him that immediately upon his conversion to their persuasion he should become as rich as a Jew. . . .

They now promised, if he would poison his wife, . . . that he should marry the rich Ben Meymon’s only daughter. This made some impression on him. . . .

Joshua Pereira engaged to let him share with him in his bottomry; upon this he was persuaded out of his Christian name. . . .

He was now completed a perfect Jew, all but black pudding and circumcision, for both of which he would have been glad to have a dispensation.

But on the 17th of March, Mr. Curll (unknown to his wife) came to the tavern aforesaid. At his entrance into the room he perceived a meagre man with a sallow countenance, a black forky beard, and long vestment. In his right hand he held a large pair of shears, and in his left a red-hot searing-iron. At sight of this, Mr. Curll’s heart trembled within him, and fain would he retire; but he was prevented by six Jews, who laid hands upon him, and unbuttoning his breeches, threw him upon the table, a pale pitiful spectacle.

He now intreated them in the most moving tone of voice to dispense with that unmanly ceremonial. . . .

All these protestations availed him nothing; for they threatened him, that all contracts and bargains should be void, unless he would submit to bear all the outward and visible signs of Judaism.

Our apostate hearing this, stretched himself upon his back, spread his legs, and waited for the operation; but when he saw the high priest take up the cleft stick [forceps], he roared most unmercifully and swore several Christian oaths, for which the Jews rebuked him. . . .

The old Levite . . . proceeded in his office; when, by an unfortunate jerk upward of the impatient victim, he lost five times as much as ever Jew did before.

They, finding that he was too much circumcised, which by the levitical Law is worse than not being circumcised at all, refused to stand to any of their contracts; wherefore they cast him from their synagogue; and he now remains a most piteous, woeful, and miserable sight at the sign of the Old Testament and Dial in Fleet-street. His wife, poor woman, is at this hour lamenting over him, wringing her hands and tearing her hair; for the barbarous Jews still keep and expose . . . the memorial of her loss and her husband’s indignity.

Prayer.

Keep us, we beseech thee, from the hands of such barbarous and cruel Jews . . . And that we may avoid suchlike calamities, may all good and well-disposed Christians be warned by this unhappy wretch’s woeful example to abominate the heinous sin of avarice, which sooner or later will draw them into the cruel clutches of Satan, Papists, Jews, and stockjobbers. Amen.

When my son was born over 30 years ago a nurse came in with a paper for me to sign. I was totally unprepared because I had been expecting a girl and neither I nor my son’s father are jewish.

The pressure I was put under was unreal. All the white coats ganged up against me to sign the gd paper. There were threats too. I received a new lecture every day and repeatedly warned I would regret it. I was accused of being irresponsible bordering on negligence that could cause my son disabling disease. That I could wake up one morning and my son would be dead. The harrassment, threats, and guilt tripping didn’t end until we left the hospital, with all my son’s body parts intact. The memory is still vivid and frightening and I’ll probably remember it to the day I die. I wonder if this still goes on today.

Yes, it sill goes on today. When my son was born, I had to tell some doctors to go f off and get out of my wife’s room because they wouldn’t shut up about the “importance” of MGM. They even stooped to telling me he would be ridiculed by other boys later in life.

If the Talmud is to be believed, Matthew Hess is a menace not only to the Jews but the entire universe. According to Allen Edwardes’ Erotica Judaica: A Sexual History of the Jews (New York: The Julian Press, 1967), the Talmud includes this insane statement: “Great is circumcision, since but for it heaven and earth would not endure. . . . So great is circumcision that but for it the Holy One . . . would not have created the universe.”

Yes. I fear you’re right. Allowing Jews to have nuclear weapons is most likely the single greatest mistake ever made on our planet.

… [Jews] are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.[2] —Voltaire, Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron (1771)

They do so at puberty or thereabouts (age 13-14?), which IMO is still too young.

Jews do it to newborn babies, and the mohel uses wine and his mouth to “cleanse” the MGM-induced wound. That’s pretty sick. Some mohels have given babies STDs in this manner; so much for the “hygiene” of MGM.

C. Hitchens wrote about some males in NYC who were given herpes from a Rabbi sucking off the foreskin (or whatever they do). That was probably the first criticism of Jewish behaviour from a MSM source I’d ever read.

Remember, routine hospital male genital mutilation (MGM) for gentiles only started en masse after WWII, justified on entirely spurious medical grounds of “hygiene” and preventing disease, but only in the USA and a few other countries. The medical establishment comes out with occasional baloney studies to “prove” the benefits of MGM, to keep the scam going. Latest claim being that MGM prevents AIDS in Africa! Somehow, Europeans who don’t suffer from MGM seem to have less problems with AIDS and other STDs than we do, so this theory simply doesn’t hold water. It’s a hoax. Unfortunately, getting rid of routine MGM in the USA is unlikely to happen in the current political climate.

Jesus! I was hoping that Counter Currents would avoid this silly subject that has infested the minds of the 5% Stormfront unemployed “everything is a Jew-Masonic conspiracy plot” poster.

Whether or not Mr. Hess is “anti-semitic”, it is interesting that the same San Fransisco politician who hell or high water opposes a ban on piercing the skull of a nine month old baby and suctioning out its brains, wants to ban the removal of foreskin on a baby two days after birth.

Which is why I read Counter-Currents. The passing Stormfront threads were disserting on this subject which saw the Jewish opposition to the ban as a plot in deceiving “Aryan” women from recognizing gentile and jewish suitors in the bedroom.

My concern is that this uber-aryan Miles Hastwick is not a featuring cause celebre and “Team America” cartoon caricature of our cause.

I am usually carefree, but was dour on this silliness, even though I agree there is some humor in this Inactivists “anti-circumcison movement.”

From now on, we will refer to circumcision on this site as “male genital mutilation.” Why do non-Jewish Americans put up with doctors routinely mutilating the genitals of their children without even consulting them and getting their consent? And why should parents have the right to mutilate the genitals of their baby boys AT ALL? The fact that all this seems normal and goes almost uncommented upon and unopposed is a rather striking measure of the depth of Jewish mind control.

What’s fascinating about this issue is that it does indeed illustrate how “facts” are constructed.

I care not what happens to Judaic infants [although Reich argued that MGM was the cause of violence and aggression, pretty funny for a kinsman to argue, but fits in with my thesis of the Middle East as a Lovecraftian pit of Evil; the Journal of Orgonomy has maps showing the correlation of MGM and war] but rather the imposition of this on non-Judaic infants.

The US is the only country in the so-called Western world that practices routine MGM, and of course for “scientific” reasons. Oddly enough, this “science’ only exists here, and its compulsive evidence loses its hold when crossing the Atlantic.

Countries like Sweden have actually long outlawed it, only recently creating a ‘religious’ exemption for the ever-expanding population of Muslim “refugese”.

Why have US parents and legislators, by contrast, been bombarded for centuries with pseudo-scientific “reasons” for MGM? Hmmm, could it be the domination of medical practice by Judaics?

Most recently, Gates and Clinton, our new World Leaders, have been spending millions to promote MGM in Africa as a measure against AIDS. Apart from the basic idiocy of preventing deaths in Africa, the bogus “studies” it’s based on are/will be used to promote MGM here.

By promote I mean, “not make illegal.” Of course, the US already practices it routinely, while Sweden forbids it. Guess which country has almost no cases of AIDS, and which one has one of the highest rates?

As more generally, everything in the Jew-dominated media is the OPPOSITE of the truth.

What do you mean, “why should parents have the right to mutilate the genitals of their baby boys AT ALL?” It isn’t the parents who are doing this; they are just a bunch of suckers who’ve been taken in, for the most part. It is the doctors who are wielding the clamp & knife and they who are quite free to refuse to have anything to do with this torture.

Doctors would not cut the undeveloped breasts of a baby girl to prevent future cancer, would they, just because the parents asked, and just because it will obviously prevent breast cancer?

Nevertheless, he was moved to act by the anti-Semitic comic book “Foreskin Man,” penned by Matthew Hess, an anti-circumcision movement leader. Asked about the precedent for using federal legislation to restrict the types of laws that may be enacted by …

Jews mock, ridicule, stigmatize and demean Whites 24/7/365 using the global media in all its forms. The primary mission of their mass media is to portray Whites as evil. Portraying Whites as evil is a higher priority for the Jews than making money. At the same time, the Jewish power structure can’t tolerate a single self-published comic book by a harmless eccentric. Goebbels wrote that White Gentiles can never truly comprehend Jewish shamelessness. This is true. It can’t be said often enough: the National Socialists were right about Jews.