I think quite possibly the fuckin stupidest thing I have EVER heard is a guy referring to a circumsized dick as "mutilated". What's funnier is that they think being uncircumsized is a good thing? First, being circumsized is so much cleaner and much more sanitary. and the most important, women hate the way dicks look as it is...leave them uncut, and they think they are being banged by an ant-eater or an elephants trunk....size not permitting. I have NEVER heard a woman say they like it uncut.

"Mutilated" is the only way to go.

LMFAO HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

So true man...anteater...great stuff, classic. Suck on that musclesucker.

I got circumsized and when the skin healed it attached to the head so now I need to get another surgery to remove it. I can function fine but it can cause pain when the skin gets stretched too much. I wish my parents would have left it alone.

seems like the guy who started this thread got his balls cut of years ago ! f**k what your wife says ! i told my wife my son is not getting his dick cut and if you don't like it f**k off ! why the f**k would you let a woman tell you what to do with your ''son'' stop being a pussy for fucks sake !

I told the wench to get in the kitchen and cook and clean! Rrrrrr!Everytime I order her around my balls swell up an extra size.Manly man! Errr-good!

I think quite possibly the fuckin stupidest thing I have EVER heard is a guy referring to a circumsized dick as "mutilated". What's funnier is that they think being uncircumsized is a good thing? First, being circumsized is so much cleaner and much more sanitary. and the most important, women hate the way dicks look as it is...leave them uncut, and they think they are being banged by an ant-eater or an elephants trunk....size not permitting. I have NEVER heard a woman say they like it uncut.

"Mutilated" is the only way to go.

That's all completely wrong.

The foreskin pulls back by itself when you achieve an erection. An erect normal penis looks no different from a cut penis. Look at any Rocco porn.

It's not more sanitary. Smegma doesn't form unless you are a dirty person that doesn't shower. I've walked around with the skin pulled back before and I noticed I was collecting threads and lint from my underwear.

All the women I've been with liked penis.

You must be either a fundamentalist christian or a Jew.

When you cut the skin and nerve endings off your penis, that is mutilation.

The foreskin pulls back by itself when you achieve an erection. An erect normal penis looks no different from a cut penis. Look at any Rocco porn.

It's not more sanitary. Smegma doesn't form unless you are a dirty person that doesn't shower. I've walked around with the skin pulled back before and I noticed I was collecting threads and lint from my underwear.

All the women I've been with liked penis.

You must be either a fundamentalist christian or a Jew.

When you cut the skin and nerve endings off your penis, that is mutilation.

1. It looks better.-> Just depends on what you are used to. I've had no complaints. I dont think women care at all. And in erected state there isnt much difference anyway. Besides, who cares what a dick looks like, its not a beauty contest.

2. It's cleaner.-> Not really. If you have a minimum of hygiene this isnt a factor.

While there are several reasons to not cut it. Maybe the most important factor is that "growth" thing that Bast also has. Why risk that for your kid?

I think most people do it cause daddy also has it, and they want junior to look like senior. I wouldnt consider it a crime or mutilation, but when you logically think about it you see that it's not a wise decision.

I got circumsized and when the skin healed it attached to the head so now I need to get another surgery to remove it. I can function fine but it can cause pain when the skin gets stretched too much. I wish my parents would have left it alone.

If you had all that done as a child why did you wait until 22 or whatever age you may get the surgery. If the skin attached to the head during the healing process, well that was 21.6 months ago. WTF!! Why would your parents not handle the situation?

The foreskin pulls back by itself when you achieve an erection. An erect normal penis looks no different from a cut penis. Look at any Rocco porn.

It's not more sanitary. Smegma doesn't form unless you are a dirty person that doesn't shower. I've walked around with the skin pulled back before and I noticed I was collecting threads and lint from my underwear.

All the women I've been with liked penis.

You must be either a fundamentalist christian or a Jew.

When you cut the skin and nerve endings off your penis, that is mutilation.

And don't forget, Oliver, that the prepuce, just like the eye-lid is self-cleansing. Smegma is a polyolegeic fatty acid that serves the function of lubricting and the glans and stopping it from callousing. It is not dirt. Now, even if we assumed that the un-mutilated penis is "dirty" , the level of filfth envolved would be no greater tn that of any other bodypart...soap would suffice.

I think quite possibly the fuckin stupidest thing I have EVER heard is a guy referring to a circumsized dick as "mutilated". What's funnier is that they think being uncircumsized is a good thing? First, being circumsized is so much cleaner and much more sanitary. and the most important, women hate the way dicks look as it is...leave them uncut, and they think they are being banged by an ant-eater or an elephants trunk....size not permitting. I have NEVER heard a woman say they like it uncut.

"Mutilated" is the only way to go.

"Mutilate": (verb)

1. To remove, through incision or traction, useful and functioning bodypart. To destroy bodily tissue through force. (mutilated Animal or person which has suffered mutilation.) (mutilation The physical scars which result from the removal of a bodypart)2. Cruel physical punishment, which envolves the destruction of one or more bodily parts.

So, yes, "circumcision" does fit all the requirements of being considered a mutilation. Get over it. Oh, by the way, I've just raped you.

I got circumsized and when the skin healed it attached to the head so now I need to get another surgery to remove it. I can function fine but it can cause pain when the skin gets stretched too much. I wish my parents would have left it alone.

I have the same problem its called a skin bridge...I also have another problem, keratinzation. and it makes me lose so much sensitivity at the glans.( I am curing that with an exfoliant cream, but it wouldnt have been the problem if I was left alone).

Anyway for the uncircumcised people, you should have expected the same reaction from the circumcised men.they will be always defensive. No person would want to admit ( at first) that something was taken from them while they were unable to do anything.Now I hate being circumcised, and I need to remove the skin bridge that will leave another scar (the first is the scar from circumcision).but since I can't do anything now (I can stretch a new foreskin which can take 2 years, but it wont be really a normal foreskin). I tend to look on the advantages instead of the disdvantages(well one advantage less likely to contract STD...but its very small in stastics that its really worthless get circumcised). I don't know how much I lost sensitivity, but I bet alot since I hear that the average man can last 2 mins in bed. I last 20 to 25 mins.(its getting better with the cream...used to be much worse).Now before anyone jumps on me and say that its good, that I will please the women better, I say I been there...women like instead of 2 mins..maybe 7 mins...8 mins..MAX... after that they think that they arent turning you on enough, and that's why you are not cumming.they get really frustrated.(let a woman in here answer this)the advantages I can look at: is not the cleaner thing... coz its just a myth...a natural penis is not dirty at all. unless you count that the natural lubrication as dirty...then I bet you never get down on a woman ever, because what lubricates the labias and the clitorial hood is the same stuff...and its barely noticable.its just to prevent irritation.

Now what is done is done... I lost sensitivity ok... I hate my scar ok... I will fix that later when they put stem cells into use.

I have the same problem its called a skin bridge...I also have another problem, keratinzation. and it makes me lose so much sensitivity at the glans.( I am curing that with an exfoliant cream, but it wouldnt have been the problem if I was left alone).

Anyway for the uncircumcised people, you should have expected the same reaction from the circumcised men.they will be always defensive. No person would want to admit ( at first) that something was taken from them while they were unable to do anything.Now I hate being circumcised, and I need to remove the skin bridge that will leave another scar (the first is the scar from circumcision).but since I can't do anything now (I can stretch a new foreskin which can take 2 years, but it wont be really a normal foreskin). I tend to look on the advantages instead of the disdvantages(well one advantage less likely to contract STD...but its very small in stastics that its really worthless get circumcised). I don't know how much I lost sensitivity, but I bet alot since I hear that the average man can last 2 mins in bed. I last 20 to 25 mins.(its getting better with the cream...used to be much worse).Now before anyone jumps on me and say that its good, that I will please the women better, I say I been there...women like instead of 2 mins..maybe 7 mins...8 mins..MAX... after that they think that they arent turning you on enough, and that's why you are not cumming.they get really frustrated.(let a woman in here answer this)the advantages I can look at: is not the cleaner thing... coz its just a myth...a natural penis is not dirty at all. unless you count that the natural lubrication as dirty...then I bet you never get down on a woman ever, because what lubricates the labias and the clitorial hood is the same stuff...and its barely noticable.its just to prevent irritation.

Now what is done is done... I lost sensitivity ok... I hate my scar ok... I will fix that later when they put stem cells into use.

I agree 100%: mutilated men are defensive, because no man likes to admit that part of his manhood was stripped away with a surgical scalpel. Just look at "Mick", and his intellectually pathetic attemps at rebutting me.

If women like it more cut than fuckin do it.... Screw all the other reasons. Who doesn't want to possess one more thing that a woman would prefer? The truth is that women like it that way and guys who aren't cut are more of a turn off because of it. Now, a lot of you guys on here will take the attitude of "Fuck what woment want.. don't do it for them." But it's a fact that the one thing in life that matters most to a man is a woman... or women for that matter. It's science, it's genetic, it's our nature.

I'm cut and I can't say, after talkin to any guy who wasn't cut that sex is better one way or another. Like I've ever NOT enjoyed sex because I'm cut... it's bullshit.

You all keep making this a way bigger deal than it has to be. All this talk about mutilation and jewish conspiracies is bullshit nonsense.