Companions: a feeling of repulsion and disgust embarga when do I have knowledge of the foundation of NEW SYNDICATES, similar to that I feel when I discover that an instance that there presumes unitarian, of hard-working, nearby quagmires, stopped, or of any other type discovers that it is an assembly, a creature made by some of the multiple parties and Stalinist small groups and even trotskistas.

Qualitatively different from the organization of how many parties they bloom or be able to bloom, or movements, in turn defined ideologically and politically, DIVIDE MOREOVER TO THE WORKING CLASS attending only on his social condition while exploited, it is to my judgment of a reaccionarismo without limits, good: but perhaps the traditional division of the syndicates – in Spain, AND IN HIS ORIGIN in a communist syndicate, Working Commissions, (CCOO), UGT, Socialist, CGT, anarcho-syndicalist, arisen in the 80s of a majority split of the historical CNT, and the presence of this one herself, is CNT, growing every day more at the cost of the perceptible descent of the aggressiveness of his split CGT – for corresponding with traditional ideological divisions in the lefts in if the same legitimized one?, only partly, I want to say, that still supposing that such divisions political - ideological were current, were shared by the majority of affiliated workpeople, which by no means happens, they all should respect and to send to the unit of the workpeople assembled in ASSEMBLIES SOVEREIGN, and de facto like that happened in the epoch of the so-called Political Transition in Spain: the strongest feeling and he practises asamblearia exercised in the difficult years of struggle of the Working Movement against the pro-Franco dictatorship, IT WAS FORCING to the newly legalized syndicates, CCOO, in his origin and during more than one decade of struggle in the dictatorship also defined as “ sociopolitical movement ” it hesitated during more than one year to be constituted in syndicate, which for governmental pressures, of the Spanish socialist party and of the same direction of the CPS as the hegemonizaba, finished with making (Cheek), nevertheless, only even come up the 90s, would not turn “ into a syndicate of office: ” so insulted for years!!.

To today,the unit of the working class has stopped being a value, a prerrequisto to gain access to the conscience of class, the assemblies only are summoned legally (in the collective agreements of company there is usually a negligible number of hours of annual of remunerated assemblies, less than 10 hours), but, while value, that empoderamiento constituent of the revolutionary subject, to today in Spain it it is for very few organizations, yes, certainly for the Bolsheviks - Leninists or trotkistas, that, as the consejistas, or since it it was the CPS, all the formally partial ones to the soviets, and that therefore WE SAW THE ASSEMBLIES OF WORKPEOPLE AS SOVIETS IN EMBRYO.

The tradition Spanish anarcho-syndicalist has to see nothing with this said vision, which has not been an impediment so that in the CNT re-constituted in the transition, - and the CGT then - the strongest presence of workpeople radically asamblearios, consejistas in the practice that little or they knew anything about Pannekoek, Korsch, or our Rose, paradoxically was doing of the trade unionism cenetista, anarcho-syndicalist, the most faithful defenders of the working assemblies, but, this know hout, this tradition cut of the experiences of the previous generation, is little less than lost: today there is evident as sectarianism, in the CNT, the void value that they give to the unitary assemblies, to the empoderamiento, to the inalienable unit of the working class organized in sovereign assemblies, in the coordination of delegates chosen by them themselves.

I have wanted to do this reflection companions – that I beat below in English of machine – before getting with Luckacs, Luxembourg, etc., since I want to know your authorized opinion, on this dissertation that here I defend:

A). - THE FRAGMENTATION OF THE WORKING CLASS, IT CARRIES TO EXTREMES TODAY, WITHOUT NOT KNOWING THAT IT CORRESPONDS WITH THE CAPITALIST DEVELOPMENT AND WITH HIS WILL TO INCREASE IT MOREOVER, USING OF THE LABOR LEGISLATIONS, SHE TURNS OUT TO BE AGGRAVATED WITH CONSIDERABLY MORE SERIOUS EFFECT, WITH THE FLOWERING OF SYNDICATES OF ALL KINDS, OF COMPANY, NATIONALISTIC, SEMICORPORATE, RADICAL, in mail with the scorn or instrumental use of the base assemblies, AND WITH THE VOID VALUE THAT AFTER THE UNIT OF THE WORKING CLASS IS RECOGNIZED.

B). - WITHOUT THE CONQUEST OR RECONQUEST OF WORKING UNITARY INSTANCES, ASSEMBLIES OF BASE, INDUSTRIAL PARKS, SLASHES, OVERCOMING THE TRADE UNION DIVISION AND SUBSUMIENDOSE THEM THE POLITICAL DIVISION, INSTITUTIONALIZING THE SOLIDARITY IN THE STRUGGLES, COMING OUT THE INTEREST OF THE PROPER INITIALS, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO UNBLOCK THE ACCESS TO THE CONSCIENCE OF CLASS.

And, in conclusion, I recognize very little value after those controlled struggles, hegemonizadas, privatized, for anyone with independence of the fearlessness or aggressiveness that in them desplieguen or they should show.

The fact that to today it seems so utopian, distant, to glimpse forms you superadore of the Syndicate, and that, consequently, we admit and accept that the reality imposes it, it cannot be a motive for leaving that the mental indolence and the certain one - and resigned - "adecuacionismo" replaces our right to try to glimpse lines of advances with regard to the present situation, so, is of receipt to emphasize one and principal tendency vertebradora, strategic: there are ORGANIZATIONAL INSTANCES ASAMBLEARIAS, unificadoras of the class - and to whose interior so much the trade union diversity regrettably existing as political equally existing or for existing, they have to subsumirse, be diluted - and from that in his day there must arise WORKING ADVICES, the line that must guide our intentions and our socio-political performance.

It demands:

1st) .-Beginning for questioning the language to the use: we deny the biggest, it is not necessary to admit that a " trade union question " should exist o " trade union topics " o " trade union tasks " of a substantive way or front and of way differentiated to " political questions " o " social questions ": not to act as like that is so much like to admit the PRIVATIZATION ON THE PART OF THE SYNDICATES OF ALL THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF ANY NATURE THAT AFFECT THE WORKPEOPLE!!

In Spain, like in the majority of the European states, the majority syndicates, CCOO and UGT, are affiliated to trade union international organizations as the CES and the CIOLS, in the practice they collaborate narrowly with the political public ones of the successive governments - aúnque are quasi organically link to the Spanish socialist party, the party of the International Socialistic one - and the punctual ones, of only 24 hours you rest generals who have signed and impelled just stage a certain punctual grade of discrepancy with regard to the plans sociolaborales of the governments, which in some way are, try to be, serious ruptures not irreversible.

3º. - The very majority affiliation of the Spanish workpeople to these syndicates - named very appropriately, "institutional" - it does not presuppose an important grade of assumption of his ideological budgets - that they do not possess - or of his practices, tactics, " trade union activity ", etc; in puridad the tie afiliativo is alike that of the obligatory insurance of the motorcar: to changes of a small monthly quota (aprox. 12€) waits for some type of protection in case of individual conflict, has hope significantly reduced in case of collective conflict: YOU ARE, dismissals, closing or deslocalizaciónes of companies, et.

4º. - The activity or trade union "life" of base is these syndicates it is insignificant in big companies, administration, education or health, and simply nonexistent in the ambience covered by the collective provincial agreements, almost in exclusive interview affecting only the small and medium company