Any idea where I can find the original Greek for Protagoras' statement:

Of all things the measure is Man: of things that are, how they are, and of things that are not, how they are not.

If the full quotation cannot be found: does anyone know at least which word for 'man' was used?
Was it [face=SPIonic]a)/nqrwpoj[/face] (implying Man as opposed to god(s)/animals)?
...or [face=SPIonic]a)nh/r[/face] (implying Man as opposed to Woman)?
...or some other?

Of Protagoras' works, only a few brief quotations embedded in the works of later authors have survived. [...] Of Protagoras' ipsissima verba (actual words, as opposed to paraphrases), the most famous is the homo-mensura (man-measure) statement (DK80b1): "Of all things the measure is man, of the things that are, that [or "how"] they are, and of things that are not, that [or "how"] they are not."

Although they explain what the reference DK80b1 means, I've had no luck tracking it down.

Ptolemaios:
Many thanks!
What is the effect, though, if [face=SPIonic]mh/[/face] is used rather than [face=SPIonic]ou)k[/face]? I mean I know that [face=SPIonic]mh/[/face] indicates probability (whereas [face=SPIonic]ou)k[/face] gives certainty) - but then for the last phrase I get something like:
of things which probably are not, how they probably are not....which just doesn't seem right, somehow.

Paul:
I had a sneaking suspicion it was the Oxford-something-or-other. Yes, another line of attack indeed! Here's hoping it will add just that edge to the project...

With participles the difference between [face=SPIonic]ou) [/face]and [face=SPIonic]mh/[/face] is something else:

[face=SPIonic]ou)[/face] is used when the participle refers to a closed set ('those particular things that are')
[face=SPIonic]mh/ [/face]is used when it refers to an open set ('all the things that are')

The difference in negation between Plato and Sextus Emp. is probably (but I haven't checked it) a consequence of different contexts.