Sui Juris Club Forum

Welcome to SuiJurisForum.com --- You are currently viewing our boards as a guest. Members of this FREE Community are able to gain access to write capabilities, private messaging, a chat room, extra forums, and more!

Pumpkin wrote:Thanks for that suggestion, I will find it and read it. I do know that the house of freedom built by our founding fathers has been vacated by the people. As I have said, he who does not defend his rights have none. Keeping lawyers on the opposing side is very important, they are officers of the court. But you have to know how to defend yourself and that is my goal. To learn how they do what they do, how I unknowingly allow it and how to change my actions to not allow it.

palani is correct when he says the problem is within "you". Why do you have to know how to defend "yourself"? Are you the "defendant" or are you the principal? Lawyers are officers of what "court" and why keep them on the "opposing" side? Do you plan on "appearing" in "court" any time soon?

"He who is of God hears the words of God; for this reason you do not hear them, because you are not of God." John 8:47

1 Timothy 6:15 "which He will bring about at the proper time—He who is the blessed and only Sovereign, the King of kings and Lord of lords,"

1 Samuel 15:22 "And Samuel said, Hath the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

23 For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, he hath also rejected thee from being king."

Pumpkin wrote:Make sure your looking up Georgia tax code, namely real property taxes. Also there is equal protection laws in most state constitution, that means the laws must be applied equally. Making me pay in gold and no someone else is not equal. And for them to accept either fiat or gold is prohibited. They MUST take gold for a debt, nothing else. This is the clause that makes fiat unlawful in the US. The restriction was put on the sovereign states, and they all break it.

fiat is lawful because that's the settled precedent. but it is unlawful for the States to account it for payment of debts. They should be using gold or silver. they must. Which means all taxes and other bills are grossly overstated. since real estate taxes are a % of the value- but that value must be accounted in gold or silver money. think about it.

Once again TPTB use presumption to transfer any burden of proof to you...

"A Presumption is but a rule of procedure used to supply wants of facts and its only effect is to cast burden on opposite party of going forward with proof." Cichecki v. City of Hamtramck, Mich. 170 NW 2nd 58. (cite tag truncated)

Please keep in mind presumption is a mortal sin, like murder, rape, ect:But if a man come presumptuously upon his neighbour, to slay him with guile; thou shalt take him from mine altar, that he may die. - Exodus 21:14

"That he may die" doesn't mean the perp is killed... but that his name is removed from the Book of Life, and he loses his soul.

TPTB PRESUME you have plumbing, a septic system, running water, insulation, wall to wall carpet, cable tv, internet, central air... and whatever else to justify a number they pull out of thin air,

and then transfer the THEIR burden of proof to you (injury & crime)

In short, presumption, with legal injury (transfer of burden), is FRAUD.

If you CHOOSE to contest it:you must take your time, ($100+/Hr) get their form... (travel expenses / lost work)contest it in writing (administrative costs)hire a 3rd party inspector, pay for an appraisal (more $)and likely take at least one day off from work (lost wages)

And (locally), you have a 180 days to contest or the opportunity is waived...

Which is a statutory limitation on fraud!!! lol

"You shall not curse the deaf nor place a stumbling block before the blind - Leviticus 19:14

Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour. - Leviticus 19:15

But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty. - James 2:9,10,12

Pumpkin wrote:Thanks for that suggestion, I will find it and read it. I do know that the house of freedom built by our founding fathers has been vacated by the people. As I have said, he who does not defend his rights have none. Keeping lawyers on the opposing side is very important, they are officers of the court. But you have to know how to defend yourself and that is my goal. To learn how they do what they do, how I unknowingly allow it and how to change my actions to not allow it.

One mans 'house of freedom' is another mans prison.

What is a 'founding father'? (Matthew 23:9 )

I could be mistaken, as that has happened once before.............These 'founding fathers' wrote that all all men are created equal.......THEY OWNED SLAVES>

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrongs look like right in their eyes." ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

LoL! No, this is a vacant piece of property. They had it over valued at 58K. I argued 2 or 3 times and they raised it every single time. Until I wrote a certified letter stating every single definition of a taxpayer in Indiana code and how none of them applied to me. So I questioned their legal and lawful authority to tax the land at all. Which really they can't, because no state can make anything a payment of debt other than gold and silver coin. I won't push it that far for personal reasons (family in gov.).

A tax, in its essential characteristics," said the court, "is not a debt nor in the nature of a debt. A tax is an impost levied by authority of government upon its citizens, or subjects, for the support of the State. It is not founded on contract or agreement. It operates in invitum. A debt is a sum of money due by certain and express agreement. It originates in and is founded upon contracts express or implied.

It seems the last 2 sentences are a contradiction , but hey they're the Supreme Court, they like making shit up as they go along.