Nicole Kidman Goes Topless For Her Latest Jimmy Choo Ads

What do you think of the shoes Nicole Kidman‘s wearing in these Jimmy Choo ads? Don’t worry, we’ll give you a moment. We know you might be a little distracted by everything else that’s happening (or not happening, we guess) in the ads.
Back with us? Good. Now we can talk about Kidman’s latest ads for the designer accessories line. Certainly Kidman’s been sexy in her Choo shoots before — her first campaign was mysterious and sultry, while her second was total Bardot-esque bombshell (and had Kidman confessing to dancing on tables!). But they’ve got nothing on her latest photos, which have her showing off her mile-long stems while artfully concealing other assets with a well-placed clutch or blazer.

Kidman’s ads, shot by photographer Solve Sundsbo, were inspired by the theme of “Nature Unleashed,” which you can see in the walk-on-the-wild-side photos like the one below (and if you’re coveting those green shoes, you can blame that on your animal instincts as well).

It’s a big turn for the star most often associated with an elegant, Grace Kelly type of icy beauty or for her laid-back Nashville mom style — and we love that’s she’s playing up her knockout side in her Jimmy Choo ads.

As it turns out, she does too: “I really enjoyed working with Solve,” she said in a statement. “It was fun to shoot new and surprising perspectives, it felt a little bit daring [and] dangerous. I loved the minimal styling and how the shoes and bags became like a sensual second skin to me.”

What do you think of Kidman’s super-glam ads? Now that you’ve gotten a good look at the shoes and bags, any on your lust list?

These ads are to photoshopped. It doesn’t even look like Nicole Kidman.

Cyndy
on January 9th, 2014

I agree with the previous comment. It doesn’t even look like Nicole Kidman. I thought maybe it was a model by the same name.

Liza
on January 9th, 2014

Why pay for the Nicole Kidman name as an ambassador or spokesmodel for the brand if you’re going to totally change the look of her face?? I don’t get it.

Shawntae
on January 9th, 2014

They had to put her name directly on the ad so that we know who it is. What’s the point of using a celeb if she’s photoshopped beyond recognition?

Terry
on January 9th, 2014

Nicole is so beautiful and skinny.

Melissa
on January 9th, 2014

Very fake. Sad that most ads are now days.

beth
on January 9th, 2014

we all agree!! photoshop is crazy. I cant believe how nobody just poses as themselves anymore… its sad! I wonder who in Hollywood REALLY is beautiful. aging doesn’t have to be so negative. ive seen several women into there 60s with such beauty and grace…

Amy
on January 9th, 2014

Ugh, what happened to her face?

Pam
on January 9th, 2014

Could never tell it was her if they hadn’t told us.

Jm
on January 9th, 2014

Nice photoshopping. I like Nicole Kidman but this is so fake. There is an aspect to her that does appear to be vane. Posing and pouting for photos and doing adds such as this. I often wonder actors that focus so much on their looks that what are they going to do when that fades?

Karolina
on January 9th, 2014

The photoshop on these ads is waaaay over the top – doesn’t remotely look like Nicole Kidman. Why bother using her if your going to make her into someone else? Ridiculous.

Jenelle
on January 9th, 2014

skinny looking fool

JOY
on January 9th, 2014

The top 2 don’t even look like her. The nose and face are really different.

ciparliamo
on January 9th, 2014

First thing I thought when I saw the ad….that doesn’t look anything like Nicole Kidman…so agree with all the other commenter….

It looks like they hired a Nicole Kidman lookalike, but it does not look like the woman herself. Very strange.

Marcia
on January 9th, 2014

What is with her face?

Kate
on January 9th, 2014

Nicole shouldn’t agree to be photoshopped it such a shame have not her face and body in this add. Nowodays everything we see not look real, why so many people don’t trust media anymore.

Hotgal
on January 9th, 2014

Those Jimmy Choo shoes are sick. (sigh) if only.

SAM HAIN
on January 9th, 2014

Thank God for airbrushing.

Joanie
on January 9th, 2014

Nicole is turning into a subject of ridicule; these over-photoshopped pictures are so, so sad.

Dillweed
on January 9th, 2014

That last picture is horribly photo shopped! I mean, they all are, but that last one is the worst. Look how skinny that left leg is and her right arm doesn’t even look real! What a shame. She’s pretty just the way she is without all of that!

Tara
on January 9th, 2014

hahaha does even nicole kidman think these photos look like nicole kidman?

Brandy
on January 9th, 2014

PHOTOSHOPPED to the max!!

Rosie
on January 9th, 2014

I agree with Bella and Ana, first thing I said, was thats not Nicole…

JM
on January 9th, 2014

Glad I’m not the only one; my first thought was that wasn’t her.

Chris
on January 9th, 2014

If the ad is about shoes, why is she topless?

terry
on January 9th, 2014

That doesn’t look like her…. and the ads are not appealing at all.

Cassidy
on January 9th, 2014

I agree that it doesn’t look like her and the ads aren’t appealing at all. I assume they are supposed to be sexy but they have failed.

Cassidy
on January 9th, 2014

Epic fail!

Cassi3
on January 9th, 2014

This looks nothing like her and I see nothing about these ads that makes me want to purchase this brand. In fact, it turns me off.

BD
on January 9th, 2014

This is Nicole Kidman? Totally unrecognizable. And why is she almost naked? Annoying!

JILL
on January 9th, 2014

Maybe the color of the hair but NOTHING else looks like her wow

Kim
on January 9th, 2014

Why does everyone always have to point out that these pics are photo shopped? EVERY magazine cover or ad is photo shopped. It’s nothing new..they’ve done it for YEARS and will continue to do so.

Lynn
on January 9th, 2014

Wow, won’t get me to believe they didn’t realize that these shots don’t even look like her. Why, she is so beautiful, don’t get it.

Kate
on January 9th, 2014

Nicole 50 years women try to ful all of us , showing her body in 17 years old and face image in photoshop. By this ad she promoting jung girls have to starve themselves to achive that tipe of body image. It is absolutly wrong, we have to price health, and show diferent tipe of body it also wrong that you have to be very skiny be a beutiful.

TX Denise
on January 9th, 2014

I agree. I saw Nicole Kidman’s name, and still couldn’t find her in the picture.

kera
on January 9th, 2014

Definitely photo shopped and nothing I can relate to.

kera
on January 9th, 2014

YUCK

kera
on January 9th, 2014

Who is this?

Dina
on January 9th, 2014

What about if we put a limit in the use of photoshop in advertising pictures? They do not look human anymore, they look like cartoons. ENOUGH.

Cam
on January 9th, 2014

These are horrible photos, I can’t tell if they are shot with her laying down or not. They made her look fake.

Belia
on January 9th, 2014

She always looks good in movies and in ads like this, but when you see her in paparazzi pics she looks so pale, old and so skeletal. I think she must not look good in real life at all. She needs some blush and some cheeseburgers.

Ris
on January 9th, 2014

So photoshopped, looks like Kylie Minogue

Mandy
on January 9th, 2014

WAY too much photoshop! It doesn’t even look like her!!

Cani
on January 9th, 2014

I wouldn’t have even known that was Nicole Kidman if the article hadn’t mentioned it.

Will these magazines just STOP with the Photoshop?! I mean come on!!

Angel
on January 9th, 2014

Sizzling hot Nicole!!! Gorgeous and stunning ad campaign JC!

Jane
on January 9th, 2014

Sorry, don’t know who that person in the photos is because it looks absolutely nothing like Nicole Kidman. Horrifying!!!Photoshop of horrors.

Nancy
on January 9th, 2014

Meh . . . photoshop . . . ugh.

PS
on January 9th, 2014

OMG, could they have Photoshopped her any more?

laarni
on January 9th, 2014

wow, this does not look like nicole kidman! she’s already pretty as is and at her age. how sad they have to photoshop her and all stars with such natural beauty. it’s like nobody ever appreciates god’s gift!

Catie
on January 9th, 2014

Uggg.. not attractive, and not how she looks at all.in “real” life..why would they want her anyway for their spokesperson, she’s pretty much done in Hollywood. A mother of four kids, two are very young little girls…trying to think of any other celebrity mother that would set this example…not coming up with anyone.

Lindsay
on January 10th, 2014

Hardly looks like her at all and I adore her. What is going on in these photos? Is she on the floor? On a table? What’s with the swirly lights and underwear? Did she just get some 50 shades in an office while wearing Jimmy Choos? What? Really, I don’t get it. Love the shoes but that’s not what these photos bring focus to…I’m too distracted by the busy angles, poses, photoshopping and lighting to want the shoes. Weird.

Lillie
on January 10th, 2014

When will ‘ads’ (for lack of a better description) stop morphing their subjects into unrecognizable aliens?! Her face looks heavily photoshopped (where is all of her nose?) and her body is made to appear elongated, so much so that she looks almost 8′ tall. Fail Nicole. Fail jimmy.

Alia
on January 10th, 2014

I don’t see anything overly fascinating about the pics. She is trying to be daring and they are nice pics but also overly photoshopped. We know what she looks like. Just like we know that Beyoncé does not have long, blonde hair, let alone a full head of hair. Kim K., etc…

PDavis
on January 10th, 2014

Mighty disappointed in her decision to do this…Kinda thought she had more class than this…Oops. My ‘bad” as they say. Ah well, another one “bares all” to maintain fame, or some such nonsense. Imagine her children and Keith really support her doing this? Yeah. Sure. Right.