The doctor expresses his desperation by not being able to convince to him in that he leaves his attitude of risk: my advice like doctor is that you must leave it, you are crushing the liver if the pain begins to radiate to the jaw and the arm, is a threat of immediate death and . (Dary M. Isaacs- General Medicine). To his around, their mother, their fianc2ee, also advises to him that she leaves the diet. The consequences of a nonhealthful diet already are appearing: could not imagine to me that this experiment would be so dangerous (fianc2ee of Morgan) I do not know it, the doctor imagined either that could happen something thus (Morgan). Morgan, in spite of the evidences that its social surroundings (the medical equipment and its family) are showing to him very clearly: the signs (high levels in the analyses) and symptoms (general malaise and depression) that they have appeared they are sufficiently significant like so that one immediate conduct of health begins, that would consist of the immediate abandonment of the diet and the beginning of a purification diet, does not appreciate of sufficient form this threat and, again, realises an evaluation of its capacities (autoeficacia perceived), that consists of the overvaluation of its physical strength.

Morgan decides to continue the experiment with the justification of which in 12 days than it has left more is not possible that to enfer to me as much as so that he is not irreversible. We are, clearly, before a risk conduct. Making reference to the model of Bishop, by which all the individuals are going to have an active paper with respect to adopting a responsibility conduct on the decisions on their health, promoting the adoption of these personal responsibilities, in the case of this conduct of Morgan, to continue with the experiment although their health is beginning to see itself seriously affected, Bishop would affirm that it is a clear irresponsibility of the subject with respect to his health.