PresidentTrump is hailing the main triumph in his battle against "haven urban communities" after a South Florida chairman requested his representatives on Thursday to start working all the more intimately with government migration experts.
For a considerable length of time, Miami-Dade County has declined to hold some undocumented outsiders in its correctional facilites for government migration specialists. Be that as it may, after Trump marked an official request debilitating to withhold government financing from asylum urban communities, Miami-Dade County MayorCarlos Gimenez altered his opinion.
Gimenez marked an official request Thursday requesting the chief of his amendments division to start respecting all solicitations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold movement suspects in Miami-Dade County prisons.
"Miami-Dade County consents to elected law and plans to completely coordinate with the national government," the request read.
Gimenez said he settled on the choice to guarantee that the area does not miss out on $355 million in government subsidizing it has coming in 2017.
Trump rushed to adulate the choice, tweeting on Thursday: "Right choice. Solid!"

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For BanningSanctuaryCities!
The fight for sanctuary cities and sanctuary states has been a long, drawn out battle these past few years. So many liberals have come out of the woodwork to support the supposed “rights” of a non-US citizen who entered America illegally in order to live off the bounty of our land.
So how did this all come to be? It’s your major cities where most of this liberal nonsense originates.
That’s one reason why it is quite a surprise when the mayor of San Antonio has come out in opposition to her city council’s predicable effort to sue the state to prevent the implementation of the ban on sanctuary cities.
“As the Express-News first reported, Mayor Ivy Taylor is now publicly opposing the lawsuit the City of San Antonio plans to file over the state’s new immigration law. Here’s a prepared statement her office just sent us:
“I believe it was premature for the majority of City Council to give direction for city staff to join in a lawsuit against the SB4 legislation. In this case, the prudent course would be to wait until a decision has been made on whether a special session will be called. Additionally, I believe that any decision to join this lawsuit should be made in coordination with other major Texas cities, which is why I have consulted with Mayors Adler (Austin), Turner (Houston) and Rawlings (Dallas). We should be certain that litigation is the measure of last resort and that the city is bearing its fair share of any legal burden. None of these conditions have been satisfied, which is why I continue to oppose City Council’s decision to join this lawsuit.”
What we’ve got here is a city council that is derelict in its responsible to support the rule of law. Non-citizens do not have the right to demand entry into the United States. And those who arrive here illegally have no right to remain. It’s just that simple.
Irresponsible leftist legislators and their allies in the court system are placing the non-existent rights of illegal migrants above the interests of American citizens. Yet they continue to get elected to office or somehow manage to keep their jobs as judges.
These sanctuary cities are more than refuges for foreign law-breakers. They are refuges from comment sense and the rule of law. Ultimately, they will pay a price for this stupidity, either in urban decay as their cities are filled with those who pay no taxes but consume public services, or from the violent lifestyles some of these illegal migrants pursue.
In any case, the legislators will get what they deserve, as will the people who elect them to office. It’s the innocent citizens who oppose this nonsense who are the victims.

published:09 Jun 2017

views:87008

Donald Trump in his first week as POTUS signs a controversial order effectively eliminating sanctuary cities and reducing the number of illegal immigrants in the US.

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It OvernightPresidentDonald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.
The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund the 40-foot tall wall that’s expected to stretch approximately 1,000 miles along the U.S. – Mexico border. Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date.
“Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported.
Original estimates for the cost of this project came in at $12 to $15 billion, however, Bernstein Research, who calculates total building cost believes it could actually come in somewhere around $15 billion to $25 billion. The Department of Homeland Security agrees, estimating a specific $21.6 billion price tag for this massive project, according to Politifact. While that total is in excess of the $14 billion taken from El Chapo upon his arrest, the financing problem could soon be solved if AlabamaSenatorLuther Strange gets his way.
Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.
Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called SanctuaryCities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.
The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.
Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.
This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.
The next best thing to using a drug lord’s seized money earned from abusing our border is to make Sanctuary Cities pay for it. They can’t make their own laws to harm people and force other people to pay for it too.

Sanctuary city

Sanctuary city is a term that is applied by some to cities in the United States or Canada that have policies designed to not prosecute undocumented immigrants in the United States. These practices can be by law (de jure) or they can be by habit (de facto). The term generally applies to cities that do not allow municipal funds or resources to be used to enforce federal immigration laws, usually by not allowing police or municipal employees to inquire about an individual's immigration status. The designation has no legal meaning.

Sanctuary

A sanctuary, in its original meaning, is a sacred place, such as a shrine. By the use of such places as a safe haven, by extension the term has come to be used for any place of safety. This secondary use can be categorized into human sanctuary, a safe place for humans, such as a political sanctuary; and non-human sanctuary, such as an animal or plant sanctuary.

Religious sanctuary

Sanctuary is a word derived from the Latin sanctuarium, which is like most words ending in -arium, a container for keeping something in—in this case holy things or perhaps holy people, sancta or sancti. The meaning was extended to places of holiness or safety. A religious sanctuary may be a sacred place (such as a church, temple, synagogue or mosque), or a consecrated area of a church or temple around its tabernacle or altar.

Cave

A cave or cavern is a hollow place in the ground, especially a natural underground space large enough for a human to enter. Caves form naturally by the weathering of rock and often extend deep underground. The word cave can also refer to much smaller openings such as sea caves, rock shelters, and grottos.

Types and formation

The formation and development of caves is known as speleogenesis. Caves are formed by various geologic processes and can be variable sizes. These may involve a combination of chemical processes, erosion from water, tectonic forces, microorganisms, pressure, and atmospheric influences.

It is estimated that the maximum depth of a cave cannot be more than 3,000 metres (9,800ft) due to the pressure of overlying rocks. For karst caves the maximum depth is determined on the basis of the lower limit of karst forming processes, coinciding with the base of the soluble carbonate rocks.

City

A city is a large and permanent human settlement. Although there is no agreement on how a city is distinguished from a town in general English language meanings, many cities have a particular administrative, legal, or historical status based on local law.

Cities generally have complex systems for sanitation, utilities, land usage, housing, and transportation. The concentration of development greatly facilitates interaction between people and businesses, benefiting both parties in the process, but it also presents challenges to managing urban growth.

Origins

There is not enough evidence to assert what conditions gave rise to the first cities. Some theorists have speculated on what they consider suitable pre-conditions and basic mechanisms that might have been important driving forces.

First 'sanctuary city' caves to Trump demands........

PresidentTrump is hailing the main triumph in his battle against "haven urban communities" after a South Florida chairman requested his representatives on Thursday to start working all the more intimately with government migration experts.
For a considerable length of time, Miami-Dade County has declined to hold some undocumented outsiders in its correctional facilites for government migration specialists. Be that as it may, after Trump marked an official request debilitating to withhold government financing from asylum urban communities, Miami-Dade County MayorCarlos Gimenez altered his opinion.
Gimenez marked an official request Thursday requesting the chief of his amendments division to start respecting all solicitations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold movement suspects in Miami-Dade County prisons.
"Miami-Dade County consents to elected law and plans to completely coordinate with the national government," the request read.
Gimenez said he settled on the choice to guarantee that the area does not miss out on $355 million in government subsidizing it has coming in 2017.
Trump rushed to adulate the choice, tweeting on Thursday: "Right choice. Solid!"

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For Banning Sanctuary Cities!

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For Banning Sanctuary Cities!

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For Banning Sanctuary Cities!

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For BanningSanctuaryCities!
The fight for sanctuary cities and sanctuary states has been a long, drawn out battle these past few years. So many liberals have come out of the woodwork to support the supposed “rights” of a non-US citizen who entered America illegally in order to live off the bounty of our land.
So how did this all come to be? It’s your major cities where most of this liberal nonsense originates.
That’s one reason why it is quite a surprise when the mayor of San Antonio has come out in opposition to her city council’s predicable effort to sue the state to prevent the implementation of the ban on sanctuary cities.
“As the Express-News first reported, Mayor Ivy Taylor is now publicly opposing the lawsuit the City of San Antonio plans to file over the state’s new immigration law. Here’s a prepared statement her office just sent us:
“I believe it was premature for the majority of City Council to give direction for city staff to join in a lawsuit against the SB4 legislation. In this case, the prudent course would be to wait until a decision has been made on whether a special session will be called. Additionally, I believe that any decision to join this lawsuit should be made in coordination with other major Texas cities, which is why I have consulted with Mayors Adler (Austin), Turner (Houston) and Rawlings (Dallas). We should be certain that litigation is the measure of last resort and that the city is bearing its fair share of any legal burden. None of these conditions have been satisfied, which is why I continue to oppose City Council’s decision to join this lawsuit.”
What we’ve got here is a city council that is derelict in its responsible to support the rule of law. Non-citizens do not have the right to demand entry into the United States. And those who arrive here illegally have no right to remain. It’s just that simple.
Irresponsible leftist legislators and their allies in the court system are placing the non-existent rights of illegal migrants above the interests of American citizens. Yet they continue to get elected to office or somehow manage to keep their jobs as judges.
These sanctuary cities are more than refuges for foreign law-breakers. They are refuges from comment sense and the rule of law. Ultimately, they will pay a price for this stupidity, either in urban decay as their cities are filled with those who pay no taxes but consume public services, or from the violent lifestyles some of these illegal migrants pursue.
In any case, the legislators will get what they deserve, as will the people who elect them to office. It’s the innocent citizens who oppose this nonsense who are the victims.

44:55

Trump Executive Order Crushes Sanctuary Cities (Full Compilation)

Trump Executive Order Crushes Sanctuary Cities (Full Compilation)

Trump Executive Order Crushes Sanctuary Cities (Full Compilation)

Donald Trump in his first week as POTUS signs a controversial order effectively eliminating sanctuary cities and reducing the number of illegal immigrants in the US.

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It Overnight

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It Overnight

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It Overnight

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It OvernightPresidentDonald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.
The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund the 40-foot tall wall that’s expected to stretch approximately 1,000 miles along the U.S. – Mexico border. Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date.
“Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported.
Original estimates for the cost of this project came in at $12 to $15 billion, however, Bernstein Research, who calculates total building cost believes it could actually come in somewhere around $15 billion to $25 billion. The Department of Homeland Security agrees, estimating a specific $21.6 billion price tag for this massive project, according to Politifact. While that total is in excess of the $14 billion taken from El Chapo upon his arrest, the financing problem could soon be solved if AlabamaSenatorLuther Strange gets his way.
Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.
Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called SanctuaryCities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.
The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.
Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.
This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.
The next best thing to using a drug lord’s seized money earned from abusing our border is to make Sanctuary Cities pay for it. They can’t make their own laws to harm people and force other people to pay for it too.

5:58

Limbaugh Calls Out Trump for Border Wall ‘Cave’ — ‘The Country Is Ready to Blame

Limbaugh Calls Out Trump for Border Wall ‘Cave’ — ‘The Country Is Ready to Blame

Limbaugh Calls Out Trump for Border Wall ‘Cave’ — ‘The Country Is Ready to Blame

THE FIRST SANCTUARY CITY CAVES IN TO TRUMP

SUBSCRIBE ► https://www.youtube.com/dailykenn
FACEBOOK ►https://www.facebook.com/dailykenncom/
TWITTER ►https://twitter.com/DailyKenncom
KENNSINGS ► https://goo.gl/hDm6cd
KENN'S LAWS ►https://goo.gl/48EoBp
KENN ON CLASHDAILY ► https://goo.gl/IzotGS
ATTRIBUTION [FAIRUSE] ▼
CopyrightDisclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on events deemed newsworthy. Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976 allows for fair use for purposes including criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 reads in part, "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."
https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html

First 'sanctuary city' caves to Trump demands........

PresidentTrump is hailing the main triumph in his battle against "haven urban communities" after a South Florida chairman requested his representatives on Thursday to start working all the more intimately with government migration experts.
For a considerable length of time, Miami-Dade County has declined to hold some undocumented outsiders in its correctional facilites for government migration specialists. Be that as it may, after Trump marked an official request debilitating to withhold government financing from asylum urban communities, Miami-Dade County MayorCarlos Gimenez altered his opinion.
Gimenez marked an official request Thursday requesting the chief of his amendments division to start respecting all solicitations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold movemen...

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For Banning Sanctuary Cities!

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For BanningSanctuaryCities!
The fight for sanctuary cities and sanctuary states has been a long, drawn out battle these past few years. So many liberals have come out of the woodwork to support the supposed “rights” of a non-US citizen who entered America illegally in order to live off the bounty of our land.
So how did this all come to be? It’s your major cities where most of this liberal nonsense originates.
That’s one reason why it is quite a surprise when the mayor of San Antonio has come out in opposition to her city council’s predicable effort to sue the state to prevent the implementation of the ban on sanctuary cities.
“As the Express-News first reported, Mayor Ivy Taylor is now publicly opposing the lawsuit t...

published: 09 Jun 2017

Trump Executive Order Crushes Sanctuary Cities (Full Compilation)

Donald Trump in his first week as POTUS signs a controversial order effectively eliminating sanctuary cities and reducing the number of illegal immigrants in the US.

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It Overnight

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It OvernightPresidentDonald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.
The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to f...

published: 07 Jun 2017

Limbaugh Calls Out Trump for Border Wall ‘Cave’ — ‘The Country Is Ready to Blame

THE FIRST SANCTUARY CITY CAVES IN TO TRUMP WITH MORE RIGHT BEHIND

THE FIRST SANCTUARY CITY CAVES IN TO TRUMP

SUBSCRIBE ► https://www.youtube.com/dailykenn
FACEBOOK ►https://www.facebook.com/dailykenncom/
TWITTER ►https://twitter.com/DailyKenncom
KENNSINGS ► https://goo.gl/hDm6cd
KENN'S LAWS ►https://goo.gl/48EoBp
KENN ON CLASHDAILY ► https://goo.gl/IzotGS
ATTRIBUTION [FAIRUSE] ▼
CopyrightDisclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on events deemed newsworthy. Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976 allows for fair use for purposes including criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 reads in part, "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduc...

PresidentTrump is hailing the main triumph in his battle against "haven urban communities" after a South Florida chairman requested his representatives on Thursday to start working all the more intimately with government migration experts.
For a considerable length of time, Miami-Dade County has declined to hold some undocumented outsiders in its correctional facilites for government migration specialists. Be that as it may, after Trump marked an official request debilitating to withhold government financing from asylum urban communities, Miami-Dade County MayorCarlos Gimenez altered his opinion.
Gimenez marked an official request Thursday requesting the chief of his amendments division to start respecting all solicitations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold movement suspects in Miami-Dade County prisons.
"Miami-Dade County consents to elected law and plans to completely coordinate with the national government," the request read.
Gimenez said he settled on the choice to guarantee that the area does not miss out on $355 million in government subsidizing it has coming in 2017.
Trump rushed to adulate the choice, tweeting on Thursday: "Right choice. Solid!"

PresidentTrump is hailing the main triumph in his battle against "haven urban communities" after a South Florida chairman requested his representatives on Thursday to start working all the more intimately with government migration experts.
For a considerable length of time, Miami-Dade County has declined to hold some undocumented outsiders in its correctional facilites for government migration specialists. Be that as it may, after Trump marked an official request debilitating to withhold government financing from asylum urban communities, Miami-Dade County MayorCarlos Gimenez altered his opinion.
Gimenez marked an official request Thursday requesting the chief of his amendments division to start respecting all solicitations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold movement suspects in Miami-Dade County prisons.
"Miami-Dade County consents to elected law and plans to completely coordinate with the national government," the request read.
Gimenez said he settled on the choice to guarantee that the area does not miss out on $355 million in government subsidizing it has coming in 2017.
Trump rushed to adulate the choice, tweeting on Thursday: "Right choice. Solid!"

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For BanningSanctuaryCities!
The fight for sanctuary cities and sanctuary states has been a long, drawn out battle these past few years. So many liberals have come out of the woodwork to support the supposed “rights” of a non-US citizen who entered America illegally in order to live off the bounty of our land.
So how did this all come to be? It’s your major cities where most of this liberal nonsense originates.
That’s one reason why it is quite a surprise when the mayor of San Antonio has come out in opposition to her city council’s predicable effort to sue the state to prevent the implementation of the ban on sanctuary cities.
“As the Express-News first reported, Mayor Ivy Taylor is now publicly opposing the lawsuit the City of San Antonio plans to file over the state’s new immigration law. Here’s a prepared statement her office just sent us:
“I believe it was premature for the majority of City Council to give direction for city staff to join in a lawsuit against the SB4 legislation. In this case, the prudent course would be to wait until a decision has been made on whether a special session will be called. Additionally, I believe that any decision to join this lawsuit should be made in coordination with other major Texas cities, which is why I have consulted with Mayors Adler (Austin), Turner (Houston) and Rawlings (Dallas). We should be certain that litigation is the measure of last resort and that the city is bearing its fair share of any legal burden. None of these conditions have been satisfied, which is why I continue to oppose City Council’s decision to join this lawsuit.”
What we’ve got here is a city council that is derelict in its responsible to support the rule of law. Non-citizens do not have the right to demand entry into the United States. And those who arrive here illegally have no right to remain. It’s just that simple.
Irresponsible leftist legislators and their allies in the court system are placing the non-existent rights of illegal migrants above the interests of American citizens. Yet they continue to get elected to office or somehow manage to keep their jobs as judges.
These sanctuary cities are more than refuges for foreign law-breakers. They are refuges from comment sense and the rule of law. Ultimately, they will pay a price for this stupidity, either in urban decay as their cities are filled with those who pay no taxes but consume public services, or from the violent lifestyles some of these illegal migrants pursue.
In any case, the legislators will get what they deserve, as will the people who elect them to office. It’s the innocent citizens who oppose this nonsense who are the victims.

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For BanningSanctuaryCities!
The fight for sanctuary cities and sanctuary states has been a long, drawn out battle these past few years. So many liberals have come out of the woodwork to support the supposed “rights” of a non-US citizen who entered America illegally in order to live off the bounty of our land.
So how did this all come to be? It’s your major cities where most of this liberal nonsense originates.
That’s one reason why it is quite a surprise when the mayor of San Antonio has come out in opposition to her city council’s predicable effort to sue the state to prevent the implementation of the ban on sanctuary cities.
“As the Express-News first reported, Mayor Ivy Taylor is now publicly opposing the lawsuit the City of San Antonio plans to file over the state’s new immigration law. Here’s a prepared statement her office just sent us:
“I believe it was premature for the majority of City Council to give direction for city staff to join in a lawsuit against the SB4 legislation. In this case, the prudent course would be to wait until a decision has been made on whether a special session will be called. Additionally, I believe that any decision to join this lawsuit should be made in coordination with other major Texas cities, which is why I have consulted with Mayors Adler (Austin), Turner (Houston) and Rawlings (Dallas). We should be certain that litigation is the measure of last resort and that the city is bearing its fair share of any legal burden. None of these conditions have been satisfied, which is why I continue to oppose City Council’s decision to join this lawsuit.”
What we’ve got here is a city council that is derelict in its responsible to support the rule of law. Non-citizens do not have the right to demand entry into the United States. And those who arrive here illegally have no right to remain. It’s just that simple.
Irresponsible leftist legislators and their allies in the court system are placing the non-existent rights of illegal migrants above the interests of American citizens. Yet they continue to get elected to office or somehow manage to keep their jobs as judges.
These sanctuary cities are more than refuges for foreign law-breakers. They are refuges from comment sense and the rule of law. Ultimately, they will pay a price for this stupidity, either in urban decay as their cities are filled with those who pay no taxes but consume public services, or from the violent lifestyles some of these illegal migrants pursue.
In any case, the legislators will get what they deserve, as will the people who elect them to office. It’s the innocent citizens who oppose this nonsense who are the victims.

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It OvernightPresidentDonald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.
The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund the 40-foot tall wall that’s expected to stretch approximately 1,000 miles along the U.S. – Mexico border. Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date.
“Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported.
Original estimates for the cost of this project came in at $12 to $15 billion, however, Bernstein Research, who calculates total building cost believes it could actually come in somewhere around $15 billion to $25 billion. The Department of Homeland Security agrees, estimating a specific $21.6 billion price tag for this massive project, according to Politifact. While that total is in excess of the $14 billion taken from El Chapo upon his arrest, the financing problem could soon be solved if AlabamaSenatorLuther Strange gets his way.
Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.
Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called SanctuaryCities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.
The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.
Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.
This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.
The next best thing to using a drug lord’s seized money earned from abusing our border is to make Sanctuary Cities pay for it. They can’t make their own laws to harm people and force other people to pay for it too.

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It OvernightPresidentDonald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.
The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund the 40-foot tall wall that’s expected to stretch approximately 1,000 miles along the U.S. – Mexico border. Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date.
“Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported.
Original estimates for the cost of this project came in at $12 to $15 billion, however, Bernstein Research, who calculates total building cost believes it could actually come in somewhere around $15 billion to $25 billion. The Department of Homeland Security agrees, estimating a specific $21.6 billion price tag for this massive project, according to Politifact. While that total is in excess of the $14 billion taken from El Chapo upon his arrest, the financing problem could soon be solved if AlabamaSenatorLuther Strange gets his way.
Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.
Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called SanctuaryCities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.
The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.
Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.
This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.
The next best thing to using a drug lord’s seized money earned from abusing our border is to make Sanctuary Cities pay for it. They can’t make their own laws to harm people and force other people to pay for it too.

published:07 Jun 2017

views:13781

back

Limbaugh Calls Out Trump for Border Wall ‘Cave’ — ‘The Country Is Ready to Blame

SUBSCRIBE ► https://www.youtube.com/dailykenn
FACEBOOK ►https://www.facebook.com/dailykenncom/
TWITTER ►https://twitter.com/DailyKenncom
KENNSINGS ► https://goo.gl/hDm6cd
KENN'S LAWS ►https://goo.gl/48EoBp
KENN ON CLASHDAILY ► https://goo.gl/IzotGS
ATTRIBUTION [FAIRUSE] ▼
CopyrightDisclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on events deemed newsworthy. Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976 allows for fair use for purposes including criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 reads in part, "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."
https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html

SUBSCRIBE ► https://www.youtube.com/dailykenn
FACEBOOK ►https://www.facebook.com/dailykenncom/
TWITTER ►https://twitter.com/DailyKenncom
KENNSINGS ► https://goo.gl/hDm6cd
KENN'S LAWS ►https://goo.gl/48EoBp
KENN ON CLASHDAILY ► https://goo.gl/IzotGS
ATTRIBUTION [FAIRUSE] ▼
CopyrightDisclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on events deemed newsworthy. Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976 allows for fair use for purposes including criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 reads in part, "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."
https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html

First 'sanctuary city' caves to Trump demands........

PresidentTrump is hailing the main triumph in his battle against "haven urban communities" after a South Florida chairman requested his representatives on Thursday to start working all the more intimately with government migration experts.
For a considerable length of time, Miami-Dade County has declined to hold some undocumented outsiders in its correctional facilites for government migration specialists. Be that as it may, after Trump marked an official request debilitating to withhold government financing from asylum urban communities, Miami-Dade County MayorCarlos Gimenez altered his opinion.
Gimenez marked an official request Thursday requesting the chief of his amendments division to start respecting all solicitations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold movemen...

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For Banning Sanctuary Cities!

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For BanningSanctuaryCities!
The fight for sanctuary cities and sanctuary states has been a long, drawn out battle these past few years. So many liberals have come out of the woodwork to support the supposed “rights” of a non-US citizen who entered America illegally in order to live off the bounty of our land.
So how did this all come to be? It’s your major cities where most of this liberal nonsense originates.
That’s one reason why it is quite a surprise when the mayor of San Antonio has come out in opposition to her city council’s predicable effort to sue the state to prevent the implementation of the ban on sanctuary cities.
“As the Express-News first reported, Mayor Ivy Taylor is now publicly opposing the lawsuit t...

published: 09 Jun 2017

Trump Executive Order Crushes Sanctuary Cities (Full Compilation)

Donald Trump in his first week as POTUS signs a controversial order effectively eliminating sanctuary cities and reducing the number of illegal immigrants in the US.

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It Overnight

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It OvernightPresidentDonald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.
The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to f...

published: 07 Jun 2017

Limbaugh Calls Out Trump for Border Wall ‘Cave’ — ‘The Country Is Ready to Blame

PresidentTrump is hailing the main triumph in his battle against "haven urban communities" after a South Florida chairman requested his representatives on Thursday to start working all the more intimately with government migration experts.
For a considerable length of time, Miami-Dade County has declined to hold some undocumented outsiders in its correctional facilites for government migration specialists. Be that as it may, after Trump marked an official request debilitating to withhold government financing from asylum urban communities, Miami-Dade County MayorCarlos Gimenez altered his opinion.
Gimenez marked an official request Thursday requesting the chief of his amendments division to start respecting all solicitations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold movement suspects in Miami-Dade County prisons.
"Miami-Dade County consents to elected law and plans to completely coordinate with the national government," the request read.
Gimenez said he settled on the choice to guarantee that the area does not miss out on $355 million in government subsidizing it has coming in 2017.
Trump rushed to adulate the choice, tweeting on Thursday: "Right choice. Solid!"

PresidentTrump is hailing the main triumph in his battle against "haven urban communities" after a South Florida chairman requested his representatives on Thursday to start working all the more intimately with government migration experts.
For a considerable length of time, Miami-Dade County has declined to hold some undocumented outsiders in its correctional facilites for government migration specialists. Be that as it may, after Trump marked an official request debilitating to withhold government financing from asylum urban communities, Miami-Dade County MayorCarlos Gimenez altered his opinion.
Gimenez marked an official request Thursday requesting the chief of his amendments division to start respecting all solicitations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold movement suspects in Miami-Dade County prisons.
"Miami-Dade County consents to elected law and plans to completely coordinate with the national government," the request read.
Gimenez said he settled on the choice to guarantee that the area does not miss out on $355 million in government subsidizing it has coming in 2017.
Trump rushed to adulate the choice, tweeting on Thursday: "Right choice. Solid!"

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For BanningSanctuaryCities!
The fight for sanctuary cities and sanctuary states has been a long, drawn out battle these past few years. So many liberals have come out of the woodwork to support the supposed “rights” of a non-US citizen who entered America illegally in order to live off the bounty of our land.
So how did this all come to be? It’s your major cities where most of this liberal nonsense originates.
That’s one reason why it is quite a surprise when the mayor of San Antonio has come out in opposition to her city council’s predicable effort to sue the state to prevent the implementation of the ban on sanctuary cities.
“As the Express-News first reported, Mayor Ivy Taylor is now publicly opposing the lawsuit the City of San Antonio plans to file over the state’s new immigration law. Here’s a prepared statement her office just sent us:
“I believe it was premature for the majority of City Council to give direction for city staff to join in a lawsuit against the SB4 legislation. In this case, the prudent course would be to wait until a decision has been made on whether a special session will be called. Additionally, I believe that any decision to join this lawsuit should be made in coordination with other major Texas cities, which is why I have consulted with Mayors Adler (Austin), Turner (Houston) and Rawlings (Dallas). We should be certain that litigation is the measure of last resort and that the city is bearing its fair share of any legal burden. None of these conditions have been satisfied, which is why I continue to oppose City Council’s decision to join this lawsuit.”
What we’ve got here is a city council that is derelict in its responsible to support the rule of law. Non-citizens do not have the right to demand entry into the United States. And those who arrive here illegally have no right to remain. It’s just that simple.
Irresponsible leftist legislators and their allies in the court system are placing the non-existent rights of illegal migrants above the interests of American citizens. Yet they continue to get elected to office or somehow manage to keep their jobs as judges.
These sanctuary cities are more than refuges for foreign law-breakers. They are refuges from comment sense and the rule of law. Ultimately, they will pay a price for this stupidity, either in urban decay as their cities are filled with those who pay no taxes but consume public services, or from the violent lifestyles some of these illegal migrants pursue.
In any case, the legislators will get what they deserve, as will the people who elect them to office. It’s the innocent citizens who oppose this nonsense who are the victims.

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For BanningSanctuaryCities!
The fight for sanctuary cities and sanctuary states has been a long, drawn out battle these past few years. So many liberals have come out of the woodwork to support the supposed “rights” of a non-US citizen who entered America illegally in order to live off the bounty of our land.
So how did this all come to be? It’s your major cities where most of this liberal nonsense originates.
That’s one reason why it is quite a surprise when the mayor of San Antonio has come out in opposition to her city council’s predicable effort to sue the state to prevent the implementation of the ban on sanctuary cities.
“As the Express-News first reported, Mayor Ivy Taylor is now publicly opposing the lawsuit the City of San Antonio plans to file over the state’s new immigration law. Here’s a prepared statement her office just sent us:
“I believe it was premature for the majority of City Council to give direction for city staff to join in a lawsuit against the SB4 legislation. In this case, the prudent course would be to wait until a decision has been made on whether a special session will be called. Additionally, I believe that any decision to join this lawsuit should be made in coordination with other major Texas cities, which is why I have consulted with Mayors Adler (Austin), Turner (Houston) and Rawlings (Dallas). We should be certain that litigation is the measure of last resort and that the city is bearing its fair share of any legal burden. None of these conditions have been satisfied, which is why I continue to oppose City Council’s decision to join this lawsuit.”
What we’ve got here is a city council that is derelict in its responsible to support the rule of law. Non-citizens do not have the right to demand entry into the United States. And those who arrive here illegally have no right to remain. It’s just that simple.
Irresponsible leftist legislators and their allies in the court system are placing the non-existent rights of illegal migrants above the interests of American citizens. Yet they continue to get elected to office or somehow manage to keep their jobs as judges.
These sanctuary cities are more than refuges for foreign law-breakers. They are refuges from comment sense and the rule of law. Ultimately, they will pay a price for this stupidity, either in urban decay as their cities are filled with those who pay no taxes but consume public services, or from the violent lifestyles some of these illegal migrants pursue.
In any case, the legislators will get what they deserve, as will the people who elect them to office. It’s the innocent citizens who oppose this nonsense who are the victims.

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It OvernightPresidentDonald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.
The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund the 40-foot tall wall that’s expected to stretch approximately 1,000 miles along the U.S. – Mexico border. Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date.
“Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported.
Original estimates for the cost of this project came in at $12 to $15 billion, however, Bernstein Research, who calculates total building cost believes it could actually come in somewhere around $15 billion to $25 billion. The Department of Homeland Security agrees, estimating a specific $21.6 billion price tag for this massive project, according to Politifact. While that total is in excess of the $14 billion taken from El Chapo upon his arrest, the financing problem could soon be solved if AlabamaSenatorLuther Strange gets his way.
Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.
Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called SanctuaryCities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.
The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.
Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.
This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.
The next best thing to using a drug lord’s seized money earned from abusing our border is to make Sanctuary Cities pay for it. They can’t make their own laws to harm people and force other people to pay for it too.

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It OvernightPresidentDonald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.
The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund the 40-foot tall wall that’s expected to stretch approximately 1,000 miles along the U.S. – Mexico border. Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date.
“Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported.
Original estimates for the cost of this project came in at $12 to $15 billion, however, Bernstein Research, who calculates total building cost believes it could actually come in somewhere around $15 billion to $25 billion. The Department of Homeland Security agrees, estimating a specific $21.6 billion price tag for this massive project, according to Politifact. While that total is in excess of the $14 billion taken from El Chapo upon his arrest, the financing problem could soon be solved if AlabamaSenatorLuther Strange gets his way.
Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.
Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called SanctuaryCities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.
The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.
Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.
This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.
The next best thing to using a drug lord’s seized money earned from abusing our border is to make Sanctuary Cities pay for it. They can’t make their own laws to harm people and force other people to pay for it too.

published:07 Jun 2017

views:13781

back

Limbaugh Calls Out Trump for Border Wall ‘Cave’ — ‘The Country Is Ready to Blame

http://ktla.com/2017/01/27/trumps-threat-to-take-federal-funding-away-from-sanctuary-cities-may-have-started-fight-he-cant-win/
-----
PresidentTrump’s executive order to block federal funds from so-called sanctuary cities may be more easily said than done.
U.S. PresidentDonald Trump signs two executive orders during a visit to the Department of Homeland Security with Vice PresidentMike Pence, Homeland Security SecretaryJohn Kelly (R) and other officials Jan. 25, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
U.S. President Donald Trump signs two executive orders during a visit to the Department of Homeland Security with Vice President Mike Pence, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly (R) and other officials Jan. 25, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
On Wednesday, WhiteHousePress Secretary Sean Spicer said the order seeks to “strip federal grant money from the sanctuary states and cities that harbor illegal immigrants” and instructs the Secretary of Homeland Security to “look at finding revenue streams going into those cities and see how they can be cut off.”
Yet, several local and state politicians and immigration experts argue that Trump’s executive order, signed Wednesday, is unconstitutional and that he won’t be able to cut off funding on his own.
“Local governments seeking to protect their immigrant communities from federal overreach have every right to do so,” New York State Attorney GeneralEric Schneiderman said in a press release this week. “Any attempt to bully local governments into abandoning policies that have proven to keep our cities safe is not only unconstitutional, but threatens the safety of our citizens.”
In California, officials appear to be prepared to fight, the Los Angeles Times reported, with some strategizing about court battles.
“He doesn’t have the power to strip funding from local communities simply because we’re sticking up for our immigrant neighbors,” said state Sen. Scott Wiener of San Francisco told the Times.
Wiener said his city and the state of California area in position to “litigate until the end of time.”
In California, we celebrate diversity. We don’t deport it. We don’t wall it off. America is and always has been a nation of immigrants.
— Kevin de Leόn (@kdeleon) January 25, 2017
While state Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon is working to essentially make California a sanctuary state, another proposal in Sacramento would pay for lawyers for immigrants taken into custody by the federal government, the Times reported.
“Cutting off funds for cities that refuse destructive deportation programs is unconstitutional,” de Leon tweeted Wednesday. “See you in court.”
So how much power does the President really have to cut off funding?
Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) said he will confront the issue of cities that refuse to comply with immigration law by signing legislation that could jail sheriffs of sanctuary cities.
Abbott said, “We have been pushing a piece of legislation in Texas that is going to pass that I will be signing into law that imposes even sterner penalties on counties. It will include things such as further defunding them. It will impose fines. And it could impose jail time for these sheriffs to enforce the laws. Oddly enough these sheriffs could wind up behind the very bars they are releasing these criminals from.”
"Take away sanctuary city funding, redirect those funds to construction of the wall. "
Hillary Emails: Top Clinton Aide Plotted to ‘Help’ News Media ‘Figure Out How ThingsWork’
Paul Ryan: House Republicans Might Force Donald Trump to Work With Democrats on Health CareKeyFactsfor Gorsuch Confirmation Fight
Mexican Archdiocese: Those Helping Trump BuildWall Would Be ‘Traitors to the Homeland’…
…Hispanic-Owned Companies Bidding for ‘Trump Wall’ ContractReceiveDeath Threats

http://ktla.com/2017/01/27/trumps-threat-to-take-federal-funding-away-from-sanctuary-cities-may-have-started-fight-he-cant-win/
-----
PresidentTrump’s executive order to block federal funds from so-called sanctuary cities may be more easily said than done.
U.S. PresidentDonald Trump signs two executive orders during a visit to the Department of Homeland Security with Vice PresidentMike Pence, Homeland Security SecretaryJohn Kelly (R) and other officials Jan. 25, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
U.S. President Donald Trump signs two executive orders during a visit to the Department of Homeland Security with Vice President Mike Pence, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly (R) and other officials Jan. 25, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
On Wednesday, WhiteHousePress Secretary Sean Spicer said the order seeks to “strip federal grant money from the sanctuary states and cities that harbor illegal immigrants” and instructs the Secretary of Homeland Security to “look at finding revenue streams going into those cities and see how they can be cut off.”
Yet, several local and state politicians and immigration experts argue that Trump’s executive order, signed Wednesday, is unconstitutional and that he won’t be able to cut off funding on his own.
“Local governments seeking to protect their immigrant communities from federal overreach have every right to do so,” New York State Attorney GeneralEric Schneiderman said in a press release this week. “Any attempt to bully local governments into abandoning policies that have proven to keep our cities safe is not only unconstitutional, but threatens the safety of our citizens.”
In California, officials appear to be prepared to fight, the Los Angeles Times reported, with some strategizing about court battles.
“He doesn’t have the power to strip funding from local communities simply because we’re sticking up for our immigrant neighbors,” said state Sen. Scott Wiener of San Francisco told the Times.
Wiener said his city and the state of California area in position to “litigate until the end of time.”
In California, we celebrate diversity. We don’t deport it. We don’t wall it off. America is and always has been a nation of immigrants.
— Kevin de Leόn (@kdeleon) January 25, 2017
While state Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon is working to essentially make California a sanctuary state, another proposal in Sacramento would pay for lawyers for immigrants taken into custody by the federal government, the Times reported.
“Cutting off funds for cities that refuse destructive deportation programs is unconstitutional,” de Leon tweeted Wednesday. “See you in court.”
So how much power does the President really have to cut off funding?
Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) said he will confront the issue of cities that refuse to comply with immigration law by signing legislation that could jail sheriffs of sanctuary cities.
Abbott said, “We have been pushing a piece of legislation in Texas that is going to pass that I will be signing into law that imposes even sterner penalties on counties. It will include things such as further defunding them. It will impose fines. And it could impose jail time for these sheriffs to enforce the laws. Oddly enough these sheriffs could wind up behind the very bars they are releasing these criminals from.”
"Take away sanctuary city funding, redirect those funds to construction of the wall. "
Hillary Emails: Top Clinton Aide Plotted to ‘Help’ News Media ‘Figure Out How ThingsWork’
Paul Ryan: House Republicans Might Force Donald Trump to Work With Democrats on Health CareKeyFactsfor Gorsuch Confirmation Fight
Mexican Archdiocese: Those Helping Trump BuildWall Would Be ‘Traitors to the Homeland’…
…Hispanic-Owned Companies Bidding for ‘Trump Wall’ ContractReceiveDeath Threats

First 'sanctuary city' caves to Trump demands........

PresidentTrump is hailing the main triumph in his battle against "haven urban communities" after a South Florida chairman requested his representatives on Thursday to start working all the more intimately with government migration experts.
For a considerable length of time, Miami-Dade County has declined to hold some undocumented outsiders in its correctional facilites for government migration specialists. Be that as it may, after Trump marked an official request debilitating to withhold government financing from asylum urban communities, Miami-Dade County MayorCarlos Gimenez altered his opinion.
Gimenez marked an official request Thursday requesting the chief of his amendments division to start respecting all solicitations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold movement suspects in Miami-Dade County prisons.
"Miami-Dade County consents to elected law and plans to completely coordinate with the national government," the request read.
Gimenez said he settled on the choice to guarantee that the area does not miss out on $355 million in government subsidizing it has coming in 2017.
Trump rushed to adulate the choice, tweeting on Thursday: "Right choice. Solid!"

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For Banning Sanctuary Cities!

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For BanningSanctuaryCities!
The fight for sanctuary cities and sanctuary states has been a long, drawn out battle these past few years. So many liberals have come out of the woodwork to support the supposed “rights” of a non-US citizen who entered America illegally in order to live off the bounty of our land.
So how did this all come to be? It’s your major cities where most of this liberal nonsense originates.
That’s one reason why it is quite a surprise when the mayor of San Antonio has come out in opposition to her city council’s predicable effort to sue the state to prevent the implementation of the ban on sanctuary cities.
“As the Express-News first reported, Mayor Ivy Taylor is now publicly opposing the lawsuit the City of San Antonio plans to file over the state’s new immigration law. Here’s a prepared statement her office just sent us:
“I believe it was premature for the majority of City Council to give direction for city staff to join in a lawsuit against the SB4 legislation. In this case, the prudent course would be to wait until a decision has been made on whether a special session will be called. Additionally, I believe that any decision to join this lawsuit should be made in coordination with other major Texas cities, which is why I have consulted with Mayors Adler (Austin), Turner (Houston) and Rawlings (Dallas). We should be certain that litigation is the measure of last resort and that the city is bearing its fair share of any legal burden. None of these conditions have been satisfied, which is why I continue to oppose City Council’s decision to join this lawsuit.”
What we’ve got here is a city council that is derelict in its responsible to support the rule of law. Non-citizens do not have the right to demand entry into the United States. And those who arrive here illegally have no right to remain. It’s just that simple.
Irresponsible leftist legislators and their allies in the court system are placing the non-existent rights of illegal migrants above the interests of American citizens. Yet they continue to get elected to office or somehow manage to keep their jobs as judges.
These sanctuary cities are more than refuges for foreign law-breakers. They are refuges from comment sense and the rule of law. Ultimately, they will pay a price for this stupidity, either in urban decay as their cities are filled with those who pay no taxes but consume public services, or from the violent lifestyles some of these illegal migrants pursue.
In any case, the legislators will get what they deserve, as will the people who elect them to office. It’s the innocent citizens who oppose this nonsense who are the victims.

44:55

Trump Executive Order Crushes Sanctuary Cities (Full Compilation)

Donald Trump in his first week as POTUS signs a controversial order effectively eliminatin...

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It Overnight

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It OvernightPresidentDonald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.
The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund the 40-foot tall wall that’s expected to stretch approximately 1,000 miles along the U.S. – Mexico border. Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date.
“Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported.
Original estimates for the cost of this project came in at $12 to $15 billion, however, Bernstein Research, who calculates total building cost believes it could actually come in somewhere around $15 billion to $25 billion. The Department of Homeland Security agrees, estimating a specific $21.6 billion price tag for this massive project, according to Politifact. While that total is in excess of the $14 billion taken from El Chapo upon his arrest, the financing problem could soon be solved if AlabamaSenatorLuther Strange gets his way.
Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.
Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called SanctuaryCities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.
The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.
Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.
This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.
The next best thing to using a drug lord’s seized money earned from abusing our border is to make Sanctuary Cities pay for it. They can’t make their own laws to harm people and force other people to pay for it too.

5:58

Limbaugh Calls Out Trump for Border Wall ‘Cave’ — ‘The Country Is Ready to Blame

https://www.patreon.com/home you can donate through this site
paypal email account ...

THE FIRST SANCTUARY CITY CAVES IN TO TRUMP

SUBSCRIBE ► https://www.youtube.com/dailykenn
FACEBOOK ►https://www.facebook.com/dailykenncom/
TWITTER ►https://twitter.com/DailyKenncom
KENNSINGS ► https://goo.gl/hDm6cd
KENN'S LAWS ►https://goo.gl/48EoBp
KENN ON CLASHDAILY ► https://goo.gl/IzotGS
ATTRIBUTION [FAIRUSE] ▼
CopyrightDisclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on events deemed newsworthy. Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976 allows for fair use for purposes including criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 reads in part, "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."
https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html

First 'sanctuary city' caves to Trump demands........

PresidentTrump is hailing the main triumph in his battle against "haven urban communities" after a South Florida chairman requested his representatives on Thursday to start working all the more intimately with government migration experts.
For a considerable length of time, Miami-Dade County has declined to hold some undocumented outsiders in its correctional facilites for government migration specialists. Be that as it may, after Trump marked an official request debilitating to withhold government financing from asylum urban communities, Miami-Dade County MayorCarlos Gimenez altered his opinion.
Gimenez marked an official request Thursday requesting the chief of his amendments division to start respecting all solicitations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold movement suspects in Miami-Dade County prisons.
"Miami-Dade County consents to elected law and plans to completely coordinate with the national government," the request read.
Gimenez said he settled on the choice to guarantee that the area does not miss out on $355 million in government subsidizing it has coming in 2017.
Trump rushed to adulate the choice, tweeting on Thursday: "Right choice. Solid!"

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For Banning Sanctuary Cities!

Look At What San Antonio Mayor Just Did After City Council Sued Texas For BanningSanctuaryCities!
The fight for sanctuary cities and sanctuary states has been a long, drawn out battle these past few years. So many liberals have come out of the woodwork to support the supposed “rights” of a non-US citizen who entered America illegally in order to live off the bounty of our land.
So how did this all come to be? It’s your major cities where most of this liberal nonsense originates.
That’s one reason why it is quite a surprise when the mayor of San Antonio has come out in opposition to her city council’s predicable effort to sue the state to prevent the implementation of the ban on sanctuary cities.
“As the Express-News first reported, Mayor Ivy Taylor is now publicly opposing the lawsuit the City of San Antonio plans to file over the state’s new immigration law. Here’s a prepared statement her office just sent us:
“I believe it was premature for the majority of City Council to give direction for city staff to join in a lawsuit against the SB4 legislation. In this case, the prudent course would be to wait until a decision has been made on whether a special session will be called. Additionally, I believe that any decision to join this lawsuit should be made in coordination with other major Texas cities, which is why I have consulted with Mayors Adler (Austin), Turner (Houston) and Rawlings (Dallas). We should be certain that litigation is the measure of last resort and that the city is bearing its fair share of any legal burden. None of these conditions have been satisfied, which is why I continue to oppose City Council’s decision to join this lawsuit.”
What we’ve got here is a city council that is derelict in its responsible to support the rule of law. Non-citizens do not have the right to demand entry into the United States. And those who arrive here illegally have no right to remain. It’s just that simple.
Irresponsible leftist legislators and their allies in the court system are placing the non-existent rights of illegal migrants above the interests of American citizens. Yet they continue to get elected to office or somehow manage to keep their jobs as judges.
These sanctuary cities are more than refuges for foreign law-breakers. They are refuges from comment sense and the rule of law. Ultimately, they will pay a price for this stupidity, either in urban decay as their cities are filled with those who pay no taxes but consume public services, or from the violent lifestyles some of these illegal migrants pursue.
In any case, the legislators will get what they deserve, as will the people who elect them to office. It’s the innocent citizens who oppose this nonsense who are the victims.

44:55

Trump Executive Order Crushes Sanctuary Cities (Full Compilation)

Donald Trump in his first week as POTUS signs a controversial order effectively eliminatin...

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It Overnight

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It OvernightPresidentDonald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.
The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund the 40-foot tall wall that’s expected to stretch approximately 1,000 miles along the U.S. – Mexico border. Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date.
“Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported.
Original estimates for the cost of this project came in at $12 to $15 billion, however, Bernstein Research, who calculates total building cost believes it could actually come in somewhere around $15 billion to $25 billion. The Department of Homeland Security agrees, estimating a specific $21.6 billion price tag for this massive project, according to Politifact. While that total is in excess of the $14 billion taken from El Chapo upon his arrest, the financing problem could soon be solved if AlabamaSenatorLuther Strange gets his way.
Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.
Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called SanctuaryCities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.
The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.
Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.
This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.
The next best thing to using a drug lord’s seized money earned from abusing our border is to make Sanctuary Cities pay for it. They can’t make their own laws to harm people and force other people to pay for it too.

5:58

Limbaugh Calls Out Trump for Border Wall ‘Cave’ — ‘The Country Is Ready to Blame

https://www.patreon.com/home you can donate through this site
paypal email account ...

http://ktla.com/2017/01/27/trumps-threat-to-take-federal-funding-away-from-sanctuary-cities-may-have-started-fight-he-cant-win/
-----
PresidentTrump’s executive order to block federal funds from so-called sanctuary cities may be more easily said than done.
U.S. PresidentDonald Trump signs two executive orders during a visit to the Department of Homeland Security with Vice PresidentMike Pence, Homeland Security SecretaryJohn Kelly (R) and other officials Jan. 25, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
U.S. President Donald Trump signs two executive orders during a visit to the Department of Homeland Security with Vice President Mike Pence, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly (R) and other officials Jan. 25, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
On Wednesday, WhiteHousePress Secretary Sean Spicer said the order seeks to “strip federal grant money from the sanctuary states and cities that harbor illegal immigrants” and instructs the Secretary of Homeland Security to “look at finding revenue streams going into those cities and see how they can be cut off.”
Yet, several local and state politicians and immigration experts argue that Trump’s executive order, signed Wednesday, is unconstitutional and that he won’t be able to cut off funding on his own.
“Local governments seeking to protect their immigrant communities from federal overreach have every right to do so,” New York State Attorney GeneralEric Schneiderman said in a press release this week. “Any attempt to bully local governments into abandoning policies that have proven to keep our cities safe is not only unconstitutional, but threatens the safety of our citizens.”
In California, officials appear to be prepared to fight, the Los Angeles Times reported, with some strategizing about court battles.
“He doesn’t have the power to strip funding from local communities simply because we’re sticking up for our immigrant neighbors,” said state Sen. Scott Wiener of San Francisco told the Times.
Wiener said his city and the state of California area in position to “litigate until the end of time.”
In California, we celebrate diversity. We don’t deport it. We don’t wall it off. America is and always has been a nation of immigrants.
— Kevin de Leόn (@kdeleon) January 25, 2017
While state Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon is working to essentially make California a sanctuary state, another proposal in Sacramento would pay for lawyers for immigrants taken into custody by the federal government, the Times reported.
“Cutting off funds for cities that refuse destructive deportation programs is unconstitutional,” de Leon tweeted Wednesday. “See you in court.”
So how much power does the President really have to cut off funding?
Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) said he will confront the issue of cities that refuse to comply with immigration law by signing legislation that could jail sheriffs of sanctuary cities.
Abbott said, “We have been pushing a piece of legislation in Texas that is going to pass that I will be signing into law that imposes even sterner penalties on counties. It will include things such as further defunding them. It will impose fines. And it could impose jail time for these sheriffs to enforce the laws. Oddly enough these sheriffs could wind up behind the very bars they are releasing these criminals from.”
"Take away sanctuary city funding, redirect those funds to construction of the wall. "
Hillary Emails: Top Clinton Aide Plotted to ‘Help’ News Media ‘Figure Out How ThingsWork’
Paul Ryan: House Republicans Might Force Donald Trump to Work With Democrats on Health CareKeyFactsfor Gorsuch Confirmation Fight
Mexican Archdiocese: Those Helping Trump BuildWall Would Be ‘Traitors to the Homeland’…
…Hispanic-Owned Companies Bidding for ‘Trump Wall’ ContractReceiveDeath Threats

26:45

The Real Baltimore: Sanctuary Cities As Resistance to Donald Trump

In episode two, we discuss Trump's plans to deport millions of immigrants and the potentia...

The City

I'm too pac and two spots the block is securedStacked up to a fiend me, I'm the one you should callBut shawty on tour, juicy couture over lawAnd the drough when it's fire bet I can talk em to fallRhymes spreaded, I said it with a styleCommerce you dealer, I gave em coke and a smileFrom poverty, no cold, it was foulNow they admire me, I've been broke in a whileWild, can't be talking to meAfter my show, I have to be forced in the vanCame to new york, christopher walken to meFiggy and pumble, christopher's walking to meSlick talking tatty, bare arms, from iran, hope you readyGrave yam yankee fitty cap, fred the god and I came to brign the city back[Hook]You know I bees in the cityYou drive v's to the cityWe push keys to the cityMayor minds hope give me the key to the cityNow rep your city, this is for the streetsNow rep your city, this is for the streetsNow rep your city, this is for the streetsNow turn upNew york life is lawlessI got the city turnt up like the stocks dumped on mike and harrisWorks the purest, same color isGirl here from school, she studyin the art of chowForget the vest I wear liff upTbm the best, they will clip emHeard you got sour around, well we'll stick emFor that 7 pounds with the wesson I will smith em7 pounds will smith, big bronx uptown and we still spitWe back flowin and y'all know I got lines around the blockLike the tunnel back openSpeaking of tunnel, you know the sun is spanCall me harry and turman cause I got tunnel visionBlue yankee fitty cap, fred the god and I came to bring the city back[Hook]You know I bees in the cityYou drive v's to the cityWe push keys to the cityMayor minds hope give me the key to the cityNow rep your city, this is for the streetsNow rep your city, this is for the streetsNow rep your city, this is for the streets

When the sun dims dramatically Monday morning, that would be like an entire power plant unit shutting down for the Lone Star State's electricity grid. The much-anticipated solar eclipse will wipe out about 600 megawatts worth of electricity generation from Texas' growing solar power industry, according to officials with ERCOT, which manages the Texas grid.&nbsp; ... "That is not very much," she said about eclipse's influence ... ....

However, The Daily Mail has reported four people are now dead.On Twitter, police described the incident as a “massive crash” with emergency services telling people to avoid the area around the city’s Placa Cattalunya along with requesting the closure of nearby train and metro stations, the Reuters report said.El Pais newspaper said the driver of ......

border into Quebec in the first 15 days of August ...Canada ended their own ban on deportations to Haiti last summer and in the first quarter of this year, almost two-thirds of Haitian refugee claims were rejected, according to government figures ... Montreal, Quebec's largest city, opened their Olympic Stadium to temporarily house the new arrivals....

The top two officers and the top enlisted sailors who were in charge when the USS Fitzgerald had a collision on June 17 that killed seven crew members will face disciplinary measures after seven crew members died from the incident, a senior Navy official said on Thursday. The Washington Post reported that Adm. William F ... The discipline varies but will include likely career-ending actions against the ship's captain at the time, Cmdr....

Spanish national police released one photograph of the suspect who allegedly rented the van and identified him as Driss Oukabir, but it wasn't clear if he was the suspect in custody ... ... U.S ... U.S ... London MayorSadiq Khan tweeted out his support for the city as well. "My thoughts are with the victims of this barbaric terrorist attack in the great city of Barcelona and with their brave emergency services," Khan tweeted ... ....

since 2004, said she decided to seek sanctuary instead of showing up to her appointment with Immigration and Customs Enforcement... citizens, stood by her side as city and federal officials spoke to reporters ... Under PresidentDonald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration, detentions of non-authorized immigrants rose 37 percent over the first six months of the year compared with the same period in 2016....

Well, Tim Martin, you ask for a sanctuarycity for Trumpsters, and some nice young men in Charlottesville, Virginia, are more than willing to oblige. Of course if a Social JusticeWarrior or two has to die in the process, hey, you gotta crack a few eggs to make an omelet, right? I'm not sure if Heather Heyer - the woman killed by a neo-Nazi in Virginia - thought of herself as one of your SJWs, but you obviously do ... ....

The awards were given at the LGBT flag raising at CityHall... Joe Maldonado, who at 8 years old because the first transgender member of the Boy Scouts in February, and Rebekah Bruesehoff, the 10-year-old transgender girl from Sussex County whose appearance at a JerseyCity rally garnered national attention the same month, were honored along with CarmenCarrera, a one-time "RuPaul's Drag Race" contestant who later came out as trans....