Hello Graham,
I have listed this as issue normRef-33.
At 12:02 04/05/10 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
>References
>
>I think RFC2119 should appear under Normative references, not Informative.
Done.
>I don't know about this, but should [UNIV4] and [UNI9] be normative?
They are referenced in a normative sentence in the bidi section, so
yes, fixed. I guess we could move [UNIV4] out of that, if we really
want (our reference practice seems to lean towards ISO 10646,
rather than Unicode).
Michel, what do you think? Can you have a look at it?
I guess the reference to 10646 may also need updating,
can you give me the newest version?
Regards, Martin.