Medal of Honor recipient
and president, Theodore Roosevelt, who habitually carried a legal defensive
firearm at all times proclaimed,

“No greater
wrong can ever be done than to put a good man at the mercy of a bad,
while telling him not to defend himself or his fellows; in no way can
the success of evil be made surer or quicker. Speak softly and carry
a big stick!”

Your greatest enemies are
those who would slyly deceive you: those who profess to “protect
and serve,” who’ve publicly sworn an oath to “preserve,
protect, and defend…” what?

Their bosses? Their municipalities?
No. The magnificent Constitution, the highest law of the land.

Deception is a sordid lie.
Liars, as is well documented, are all thieves.

The greatest theft is that
of your most cherished possession, your precious life.

Do they truly believe us
to be that gullible? Apparently.

The least among us still
capable of exercising a modicum of logic will readily perceive the glaringly
obvious fact that throughout the universe, at any time, it’s an
immutable principal that action always beats reaction, as ably demonstrated
by placing a common object on a table, easily accessible to both the subject
and yourself, then invite the subject to put his hand a convenient distance
above the object, say, about a foot away, then place your hand twice that
distance, roughly two feet over the object, instructing the subject to
keenly observe your hand, and when it moves, to instantly seize the object.

You’ll effortlessly
snatch the object each time, because action always beats reaction.

Given this knowledge as a
basis for argument, politely inquire of your local mercenary proxy-guardian
“police,” “say, if I call you to come to my house for
some problem, isn’t there always some kind of paperwork you fill
out?”

Copious embarrassed silence
will ensue, because they all know the truth, too.

How long does it take the
average mercenary proxy-guardian “policeman” to draw and fire
their “government”-issued firearm?

On the average, about a second
and a half.

How long does it take the
average citizen to cross the length of the diagonal of an average large
room, about twenty-one feet?

On the average, about a second
and a half.

When dealing with the unwashed
public, are mercenary proxy-guardian “policemen” ever twenty-one
feet away when they interact?

Of course not: logic dictates
that conversations take place at arm’s length.

Then, you may inquire, why
the prominent display of a useless “government”-issued firearm?

Same as the dazzling lights
atop the vehicles casually provided them with your extorted tax dollars:
deterrence- psychological intimidation.

Those in elected positions
of stewardship, mercenary proxy-guardian “police” chiefs,
are deathly fearful of frivolous litigation and their subsequent loss
of domination and eminence.

This is why, contrary to
their own hard experience, they shamelessly demand their subjects “never
resist- just give them what they want.”

What is it that mercenary
proxy-guardian “police” most tremble in terror over? That
you discover what they know.

Their elite training and
experience, their very equipment is to be forbidden to their erstwhile
masters, you.

Such equipment may be snatched
from your law-abiding hands, but knowledge can’t be: their only
recourse is your death.

They won’t hesitate:
ask Gordon Kahl, Randy Weaver, David Koresh, and a burgeoning number of
political prisoners, among them lion-hearted Rick Stanley.

If you took your obligation
as a citizen of this once-great nation seriously, you’d obtain the
same training and experience as those you blindly rely on to “defend”
you- who know they have no such responsibility to provide.

In every state in the u.
S., courts have unanimously ruled that mercenary proxy-guardian “police”
have no duty to protect any individual, immediately or otherwise.

In the words of justice Casey
Percell, “It is not the responsibility of… ‘government’
or the legal system to protect a citizen from himself.”

In DeShaney v. Winnebago
County Department of Social Services, the supreme court ruled that
the Constitution doesn’t impose an obligation on state and local
“governments” to defend innocent citizens from illegal harm,
writing quite specifically: “Nothing in the Due Process Clause
itself requires the State to protect the life, liberty and property of
its citizens against [illegal] invasions by private actors.”

You want it in Los Angeles?
Ne Casek v. City of Los Angeles, (1965).

In Chicago? Keane v.
Chicago, (1968).

New York? Shernov v.
New York Transit Authority, (1982).

A Federal Appeals Court declared
as recently as 1982, “There is no Constitutional right to be
protected by the state against being [illegally] murdered by criminals
or madmen.”

Warren v. District of
Columbia, a particularly brutal crime in which three female roommates
were awakened by the noise of their back door being kicked in.

The woman innocently sleeping
on the second floor was then brutally assaulted, raped, and sodomized
by two threats.

Carolyn Warren frantically
called nine-one-one, only to be illegally assaulted as well.

One of three landmark cases
on the subject, the court in 1978 declared, “A ‘government”
and its [armed] agents are under no general duty to provide…[mercenary
proxy-guardian] ‘police’ protection, to any particular individual
citizen.”

In California supreme court's
recent unanimous decision in Zelig v. County of Los Angeles the
court arrogantly proclaimed loudly and clearly: "It is well established
that public entities generally are not liable for failing to protect individuals
against crime. The public entities and their policymaking officers and
employees are immune from liability for any failure on their part to provide
sufficient [mercenary proxy-guardian] ‘police’ services."

Showing no sorrow or regret,
the court admitted that extremist victim disarmament laws had unconstitutionally
disarmed the victim: "the state, by enacting a[n unconstitutional]
general statute prohibiting possession of a [legal defensive]
firearm in any courthouse, curtailed her ability to arm herself in [justifiable
immediate] self-defense."

Bottom line? “Government”
can unconstitutionally disarm you, knowingly put you in deadly danger
without so much as a warning, refuse and fail to protect you from the
known danger... and then, smiling charmingly, get off scot-free when the
threat then illegally harms or even maliciously kills you!

“Jim Grover”
wisely observed, “I’m still waiting for some smart citizen
to bring a [mercenary proxy-guardian] ‘police’ department
to court for having the logo ‘to protect and serve’ on its
car doors after they have been [illegally] victimized. It is
a misnomer, a joke on us. They cannot protect us. The ‘serve’
should be expanded to read, ‘to serve the public by [merely]
taking reports after the crime has been committed.’”

America began as a nation
where selfless sheepdogs vigilantly guarded each other from occasional
vicious predatory wolves.

Somehow, it’s now deteriorated
into a nightmare where countless wolves are guarded instead by mere frightened
sheep!

Ninety-eight percent of the
populace is such sheer mindless, cowering sheep: dull, docile creatures
that can only harm each other by accident and whose sole pathetic defense
mechanism is denial.

Wolves don’t fear stupid
sheep with legal defensive weapons because they know they don’t
have the mindset or proper training to effectively employ them, and only
hope that the wolf isn’t cunning enough to discern it, else the
wolf will simply seize the useless tool and employ it against the disheartened
sheep.

One percent of the population
is predatory wolves, which happily prey on powerless sheep, unconcerned
at their harrowing plight.

Wolves hunt in packs. Do
you know why? If not, you’re already a very inviting victim.

No matter how massive the
intended prey, by naturally incorporating the principle of multiple threats,
the pack creates a disparity of force by way of sheer numbers and will
easily overwhelm a healthy, strong lone victim.

The pack also uses the advantage
of determining the place and moment of the assault at their greatest advantage.

Sheep exist solely as food
for such bloodthirsty predators because they don’t choose to think
-and plan -like predators because they lack the fearsome tools, razor-sharp
fangs, and knifelike claws, needed to defend themselves.

One percent of the population
are by nature valiant sheepdogs that, although they possess both piercing
fangs and slashing claws like a wolf, would never harm sheep and in fact,
steadfastly protect them, longing for a just battle.

The wolf, a born predator,
while he thoroughly understands the nature of sheep, will never be one
of them.

Can you answer this question
about sheep? Why does the cowardly sheep fear the courageous sheepdog?

Answer: Sheep can’t
tell the difference between a wolf and a sheepdog; admittedly, both are
canines.

In their blind ignorance,
they focus only on the fearsome tools, razor-sharp fangs and knifelike
claws, which they irrationally fear must be used against them, and so
become terrified, neglecting the inherent desires of the diverse species.

Simple sheep, which can’t
comprehend canine ways, are therefore afraid of all canines.

Only the brave sheepdog,
who understands the predatory ways of wolves, but who refuses to become
one, and who also understands the frightened nature of sheep, but won’t
become one of them either, will consistently act for the benefit of sheep
and the just destruction of wolves.

Long ago, Aristotle stated
the defensive disadvantage bestowed upon man by nature.

In “Parts of Animals,”
he observed that "the structure of Man is... worse than that
of any other animal," he being "barefoot, unclothed, and void
of any weapon of force."

Instinct and genetics endow
animals with the practical means to defend against threats in nature.

History, experience, and
a superior mind do likewise for Man, except his threats far exceed those
of the natural world; he has despotic “government” trying
to de-claw, dehorn, and disarm him.

For Man to succumb to tyranny
without a fight would be a violation of his nature.

It boils down to this: if
they won’t trust you, their master, with the means to immediately
justly protect yourself and your beloved family, they can’t be trusted
to protect you.

Doctor Robert Peck, author
of “People of the Lie: The hope for healing human evil,” defines
evil as “that force, residing either inside or outside of human
beings, that seeks to kill life or liveliness.”

Andrew Delbanco, author of
“The Death of Satan,” describes it this way: “Evil
is best understood as privation, as the absence of an appreciation for
the goodness of the world and for the full humanity of all the creatures
in the world."

Robert Ressler advises, "There's
murder and there's murder. You just have evil incentive and evil tendencies.
I've had the feeling in interviews with these people that there's something
beyond what we can comprehend."

Philosophers, theologians,
psychologists, and even biologists have all grappled with the notion of
the irredeemable person.

There's no end to the number
of ways we can portray evil acts among human beings in this world, from
genocide to torture to racism to sadism, some people just develop a badness
that inspires them to act out.

We want to think of them
as "different" so we can reassure ourselves that they're monsters
and that such monstrosity would never arise out of normal people, yet
it does.

Americans have lost their
sense of evil, and we’ve become tolerant of the many forms of evil
in our midst.

It's increasingly obvious,
yet we’ve lost a vocabulary for discussing it, and our explanations
for evil have never been weaker.

The unending cases of hatred,
brutality, and wanton callousness make it clear that there are people
who intend us great harm, and we must ever be alert.

Predatory criminals never
see themselves as being evil; twisting their motivations in their own
minds to blame someone, anyone, everyone else.

In the insightful words of
philosopher Friederich Nietzsche, “Whoever fights monsters should
see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And, when
you look into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you.”

This explains the catastrophic
shortcoming in the expedient but tragically flawed concept of mercenary
proxy-guardian “police,” and the brilliant strength of unorganized
Militia: each time dutiful a mercenary proxy-guardian “policeman”
confronts monstrous evil, a little more inexorably rubs off on him, poisoning
his soul, hastening the inevitable self-destructive spiral from soaring
idealism: “because I want to help people,” confident he alone
can solve all humanity’s problems, to coarse reality: “just
to survive,” fearfully discovering that not only can’t he
even make a dent in crime, he can’t even solve his own problems,
to despondent apathy: “looking out for number one,” simply
attempting to make it through one more shift alive, to hopeless burnout:
“I just don’t care,” actually hoping some merciful bad
guy will do him in.

Why else is it that so many
of them choose suicide -typically with the very firearm issued to them
by an uncaring “government” -rather than continue to face
a future they’ve come to view as unchangeable?

In the words of Founder James
Madison "Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing
army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace."