Wolters Kluwer Health
may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed
to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without
your express consent. For more information, please refer to our Privacy Policy.

Background: This study measures the impact of adolescent breast asymmetry compared with macromastia and female controls.

Methods: The following surveys were given to patients with breast asymmetry, macromastia, and controls aged 12 to 21 years: Short Form Health Survey, Version 2 (Short Form-36), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Eating Attitudes Test. Demographics were compared, and linear regression models, adjusted for body mass index category and age, were fit to determine the effect of case status on survey score.

Results: Fifty-nine adolescents with asymmetry, 142 controls, and 160 macromastia patients participated. After controlling for differences in body mass index category, asymmetry patients scored lower on psychological Short Form-36 domains and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale than controls (p < 0.05), but did not differ in physical health. When compared with macromastia adolescents, asymmetry patients scored significantly better on Short Form-36 physical health domains (p < 0.05), but had similar decrements in emotional functioning, mental health, self-esteem, and eating behaviors/attitudes, after accounting for differences in age. Age and asymmetry type and severity had no effect on survey scores, independent of body mass index category (p > 0.05). Asymmetry patients had a higher mean body mass index percentile than controls (83.36 versus 73.52) but did not differ from that of macromastia patients (83.39).

Conclusions: Breast asymmetry may negatively impact the psychological quality of life of adolescents similar to macromastia. Breast asymmetry is not just a cosmetic issue. Providers should be aware of the psychological impairments associated with asymmetry and provide proper support.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Video Discussion by Patrick Garvey, M.D., is available online for this article.

Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.

Email to a Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name: (optional)

Your Email:

Colleague's Email:

Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).

Message:

Send a copy to your email

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.

Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.

Add Item(s) to:

An Existing Folder

A New Folder

Folder Name:

Description:

The item(s) has been successfully added to "".

David H. Song, M.D., M.B.A. is the President-elect of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). He is a consultant with BioMet, Emmi Solutions, LLC, a consortium-member providing senior debt for Brava, and consultant with and investor in HealthEngine.com. He receives author royalties from Elsevier. Scot Glasberg, M.D. is the President of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). He is a consultant with LifeCell Corp and Mentor Corp and an investor with Strathspey Crown. The authors have no sources of funding to report related to the writing or submission of this discussion.

The location and affiliation information should read as follows: Arlington Heights, Ill. From the American Society of Plastic Surgeons/Plastic Surgery Foundation.