Internet today consists of two parts

one is USA~managed which is dominated by google,facebook,twitter,ebay ,cisco and amazon the other is China~managed,which is dominated by baidu,QQ,Weibo,Taobao,huawei and Alibaba. india's internet belongs to usa~managed one.

china~managed cyberspace has almost 700m~ 800m active netizens ,which is almost equal to the combined of the rest countries. QQ has 700m active users ,which can match facebook. alibaba'sale is larger than the combined of ebay and amazon. the NO. of Weibo's users can match twitter too. huawei is asskicking cisco.

Chinese boasting again LOL ...... China managed one is confined to China only since Chinese are more in number and their language is different and most of them are not habituated to english they used Chinese sites.

As India is becoming IT Giant and almost all softwares in the world have significant Indian hand, we need to take it further and start making Indian based systems and also stop felling on the "foreign made" stuff.

As India is becoming IT Giant and almost all softwares in the world have significant Indian hand, we need to take it further and start making Indian based systems and also stop felling on the "foreign made" stuff.

Click to expand...

That's true. There are things which we need to learn from China especially when it comes to Internet Data Security.

In fact, GOI needs to introduce India specific social networking sites wherein Govt will have control over the user data.

Now a days, the US based social networking sites have become a threat to national security and our govt cannot control them completely.

one is USA~managed which is dominated by google,facebook,twitter,ebay ,cisco and amazon the other is China~managed,which is dominated by baidu,QQ,Weibo,Taobao,huawei and Alibaba. india's internet belongs to usa~managed one.

Click to expand...

However when looking into top shareholders behind u find most of these Chinese brands being held by foreign investors (South African, Japanese PE and Arab prince etc.), listed in Nasdaq, or based offshore in Virgin Islands alike.

Indians perhaps mostly of a techie typeï¼Œ but not so much enthusiastic abt creating a "network" or "hardware" enterprise of their own. Having an FB or TW account may give'em a feel of riding on the "mainstream" or merging into the "world".

As for tremendous commercial value or cyber security involved, it's hardly of any layman's concern.

However when looking into top shareholders behind u find most of these Chinese brands being held by foreign investors (South African, Japanese PE and Arab prince etc.), listed in Nasdaq, or based offshore in Virgin Islands alike.

Indians perhaps mostly of a techie typeï¼Œ but not so much enthusiastic abt creating a "network" or "hardware" enterprise of their own. Having an FB or TW account may give'em a feel of riding on the "mainstream" or merging into the "world".

As for tremendous commercial value or cyber security involved, it's hardly of any layman's concern.

Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2

Click to expand...

shareholding is nothing.almost all their R&D,business headquater,hosting cpmputers and sales are in china.they have to abide by chinese laws and cooperate with chinese government first.