Thank you for all the appreciation. But was wondering why a few has a notion that a good picture requires a good camera.Still art also requires proper lighting, a good model, the right mood and a good eye.Spread the love! :)

If you ask me..I don't really like cropping pictures or adjusting orientations.It does the trick of removing unnecessary or sometimes details on the photo.. kind of like hiding something, or missing the rule of thirds.but then we have our own preferences.some like it with post process while others don't.The photos look AMAZING btw!if post edited, I would've tip the temperature to blue, adjusted the darker tones, and brought down exposure just a little to remove the gloss on the skin.

I knew only a few photographers who would be considered a purist (I recall seeing your post considering him a purist a few days back). I used to be one of them (Tamad kasi ako magedit back then) but photoshop/lightroom isn't that bad for an assistant. ^_^

I got to check his works on fb. If you ask me, if he crops to shoot (meaning filling the frame before shooting) he'd be a purist. However, if he crops using any software available, he can't be considered a purist (that's my own opinion btw).

Nonetheless, the photo were good and the model fits...galing ng pagka-emote...But I would just like to made a point that good pictures are taken by excellent photographers and not because of a high tech cameras...a point and shoot can always do.

Nice photos. Though there is really nothing wrong with post-processing because there are really colors that cannot be caught by the camera's sensor. Pero for a family portrait, sticking to the colors is a really nice thing though adjusting a little bit won't hurt. :)