The noose is slowly tightening. An all out offensive has been launched,
using the three most important instruments of economic power - World Trade
Organisation (WTO), the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) - along with the badly bruised but democratically elected governments.
And this time, the target is not oil but to force the world to accept
genetically modified foods and crops.

In reality, the battle for controlling the global food chain has begun.

The American administration fired the first missile by formally launching in
May a complaint with the WTO against the European Union for its five-year
ban on approving new biotech crops, setting the stage for an international
showdown over an increasingly controversial issue. Interestingly, the US
Trade Representative Robert Zoellick says the European policy is illegal,
harming the American economy, stunting the growth of the biotech industry
and contributing to increased starvation in the developing world.

Coinciding with the frontal attack through the dispute panel, is a seemingly
harmless exercise to close ranks around flawed economic policies. Senior
officials of the WTO-IMF-World Bank met at Geneva in May to deliberate on
how to bring greater 'coherence' in their policies through 'liberalization
of trade and financial flows, deregulation, privatization and budget
austerity'. As if, loan conditions of the IMF/World Bank that have forced
developing countries to lower their trade barriers, cut subsidies for their
domestic food producers, and eliminate safety nets for rural agriculture
were not enough, the WTO Agreement on Agriculture could be used very
effectively to allow America -- and 12 other food exporting countries -- to
dump unwanted genetically altered foods thereby destroying food
self-sufficiency in developing countries and expanding markets for the large
grain exporting companies.

Trade and financial manipulations alone are not enough. With the United
Nations no longer relevant, any such global offensive needs political
allies. Therefore, three ministers from each of the 180 invited countries -
and holding the portfolios of Trade, Agriculture and Health -- will assemble
at downtown Sacramento in California from June 23-25. The invitation, which
comes from the US Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman, is essentially for
educating (in reality, intimidating) these democratically elected
representatives on the virtues of GM foods, and why they must back the US
transnational corporations fight against global hunger. If not, then why
they must remain quiet like they did when the US was searching for 'weapons
of mass destruction' in Iraq.

The three-pronged attack will force the European Union, to begin with, to
either alter its policy toward GM crops and foods, which some consumer
groups call as 'Franken foods', or face economic sanctions across a range of
sectors. For the US, the European markets for genetically modified crops and
seed are potentially worth several billion dollars a year. For the rest of
the world, Ann Veneman will explain the 'consequences' - both economic and
political - of not accepting the fruits of 'cutting-edge' technology, as
genetic engineering is fondly called. The first GM Ministerial, therefore,
is not open to the public.

The overt and covert machinations to push unhealthy and risky GM foods had
actually begun a decade ago. The US has so far opposed the Cartagena
Protocol on Biosafety, which has been signed by over 100 countries and was
intended to ensure through agreed international rules and regulations that
countries have the necessary information to make informed choices about GM
foods and crops. Earlier, the US had made every possible attempt to see that
the Cartagena Protocol does not come through. And when it did, the US gave a
damn and prefers to stay away.

Whether it is Cartagena Protocol or the Kyoto Protocol, the US continues to
defy the international order. Since the US has still not ratified the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), it has no need to follow the
Cartagena Protocol and therefore will try to force the GM food down the
throat of every other country. Moreover, the US continues to hold the world's
largest collection of plant germplasm, some 600,000 plant accessions that
actually belongs to the developing world. These plant collections, forcibly
held in custody, are the raw material for the multi-billion dollar American
biotechnology industry. In addition, the biotechnology industry has earned
an estimated US $ 5.4 billion from biopiracy alone.

With the biotech patents coming into force, and the definition of
micro-organism extended to include genes and cell lines, the US has ensured
that once the trade-related intellectual property rights (TRIPs) Agreement
is internationally harmonized in 2005, it will be the beginning of the end
for public sector research in agriculture in the developing countries. In
the words of a former chairman of the Consultative Group on International
Agriculture Research (CGIAR), Dr Ismail Serageldin: "Whenever the product
and process patents in food and agriculture come into effect, it will be a
scientific apartheid against Third World."

Agricultural research, which has been instrumental in ushering in food
self-sufficiency in many of the Third World countries in the post-green
revolution era, is being gradually dismantled. The CGIAR itself is under
tremendous pressure from the agri-business corporations, which sees it as
the main obstacle in the process of control and manipulation. With research
priorities shifting from national requirements to servicing the
biotechnology industry, like in India, it will be a matter of time before
developing countries begin to return to the frightening days of
'ship-to-mouth' existence.

Food aid to starving populations is about meeting the urgent humanitarian
needs of those who are in dire need. Ideally, it should not be to push the
commercial interests of the biotechnology corporations (while staying away
from the international consensus such as the Cartagena Protocol), or
planting GM crops for export, or indeed finding outlets for domestic
surplus. First finding an outlet for its mounting food surplus through the
mid-day meal scheme for African children (force fed through the World Food
Programme), the US then literally arm-twisted four African countries to
accept GM food at the height of the food scarcity that prevailed in central
and southern Africa in 2002. It even tried forcing the International
Federation of Red Cross to lift the GM food as part of an international
emergency so as to feed the hungry in Africa.

It didn't work. Zambia led the resistance against GM foods, saying that it
would prefer its poor to die than to feed them with unhealthy food.

The US has finally found a way out to circumvent and to force the African
countries into submission. The US Senate has passed a bill, entitled "the
United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of
2003," (HR 1298)", which in a diplomatic way (calling it as 'sense of
Congress') links financial aid for combating HIV AIDS with GM food
acceptance. Section 104A states that "individuals infected with HIV have
higher nutritional requirements than individuals who are not infected with
HIV, particularly with respect to the need for protein. Also, there is
evidence to suggest that the full benefit of therapy to treat HIV/AIDS may
not be achieved in individuals who are malnourished, particularly in
pregnant and lactating women."

The next sentence reads: "It is therefore the sense of Congress that United
States food assistance should be accepted by countries with large
populations of individuals infected or living with HIV/AIDS, particularly
African countries, in order to help feed such individuals." The underlying
objective is very clear: the US can use the verdict to stop humanitarian aid
for HIV/AIDS unless the recipient countries first buy GM food. This is killing two
birds with one stone.

This is not an isolated effort. The Rockefeller Foundation, in collaboration
with the US-based Madison Institute, had earlier launched a project, called
the 'Madison Initiative'. Under the guise of humanitarian aid and support,
the 'Madison Initiative' was aimed at pushing GM crops to tide over the
increasing food insecurity arising from the growing vulnerability of
HIV/AIDS affected economies. The basic premise being that HIV/AIDS has taken
a heavy toll of able-bodied rural males in most parts of Africa. As a
result, there is not enough manpower left in the rural areas to undertake
agricultural operations like spraying of pesticides. Therefore, these
countries must accept GM crops like Bt corn, which they say require less
chemical sprays!

This wonderful (sic) initiative was to be executed by CGIAR as an active
partner. Such was the desperation that agricultural scientists had actually
gone and met former President Moi of Kenya, who had agreed to officially
support the 'Madison Initiative', subsequently to be extended to other
Africa countries, including South Africa, and then to India, Pakistan,
Bangladesh, Thailand and to other parts of Southeast Asia.

Way back, in 1986, the US had similarly enacted a legislation, called
Bumper's Amendment, that prohibited "agricultural development activities,
consultation, publication, conference, or training in connection with the
growth and production in a foreign country of an agricultural commodity for
export which would compete with a similar commodity grown or produced in the
United States." As a result the American support for research and
development for crops, which competed with those grown in the United States
were stopped. No wonder, the FAO, the CGIAR and numerous other developing
country agricultural programmes continue to remain starved for financial
support. With national research programmes closing down for paucity of
funds, the field is now open for the biotech industry to take over.

Never in the past history, has any government stepped in to force the world
and that too literally down the throat into accepting what it produces.
Never before has the world been forced to accept technologies (howsoever
risky these might be) and that includes nuclear power, in the name of poor,
hungry and sustainable development. Never before has any country tried to
force feed a hungry continent by creating a false scenario of an impending
famine, which never happened. Never before has science and technology been
sacrificed in such a shameful manner for the sake of commercial growth and
profits.

The tragedy is that 'good' science has been given a quiet burial. On the
other hand, the party for the biotechnology industry has just begun.

Hunger cannot be removed by producing transgenic crops with genes for beta-carotene. Somehow, the international community misses misses the woods from the trees in an effort bolster the commercial interests of the biotechnology industries.

In the meantime, the reality of hunger and malnutrition is too harsh to be even properly
understood. Hunger cannot be removed by producing transgenic crops with
genes for beta-carotene. Hunger cannot be addressed by providing mobile
phones to the rural communities. Nor can it be eradicated by providing the
poor and hungry with an ``informed choice'' of novel foods. Somehow, the
international community misses the ground realities, misses the woods from
the trees in an effort bolster the commercial interests of the biotechnology
industries. In its over-enthusiasm to promote an expensive technology at the
cost of the poor, what has been overlooked is that biotechnology has the
potential to further the great divide between the haves and have-nots.

While the political leadership is postponing the monumental task to halve
the number of the world's hungry, the scientific community too has found an
easy escape route. At almost all the genetic engineering laboratories,
whether in the North or in the South, the focus of research is on transgenic
crops that adds to profits, edible vaccines and bio-fortification to address
the problems of malnutrition or "hidden hunger" by incorporating genes for
Vitamin A, iron, and other micro-nutrients. But what has been forgotten in
the first instance is that unless hunger is removed, 'hidden hunger' cannot
be eradicated. In other words, if the global scientific and development
community were to aim at eradicating hunger at the first place, there would
be little "hidden hunger".

Much of the existing hunger in the world is because of lop-sided trade and
economic policies that keep the farmers in rich countries plump with massive
subsidies, the resulting impact of which creates more hunger, malnutrition
and destitution in the majority world. The
crisis on the farm front is because of the massive subsidies that continue
to be paid in the richest trading block - the OECD. Let us not forget, that
subsidies are paid not only to keep the miniscule population of farmers on
either side of the Atlantic happy, but also to keep the elected governments
in saddle. The US Farm Security and Rural Investment Act (FSRIA) for
instance was signed at the beginning of May 2002, bringing in an additional
US $ 180 billion to its farmers in the next ten years. This was a small
price (and that too from the State exchequer) to be paid for sparsely
populated but agriculturally frontline mid-west region. George Bush badly
needed a Republican majority in the US Senate. Senatorial elections took
place in 2002 and the promise of a Farm Act delivered it.

As a result of the subsidy hike in America, millions of small and marginal farmers in the developing world would be driven out of agriculture to move
to the urban slums in search of a menial living. Highly subsidized agriculture in America, and for that matter in the OECD, is the root cause for growing hunger,
destitution and poverty in the majority world. GM foods, produced by the biotechnology corporations, will further exacerbate the food crisis - eliminating in the
process not hunger but the hungry.

Devinder Sharma01 June 2003

Devinder Sharma is a food and trade policy analyst. He also chairs the New Delhi-based Forum for Biotechnology & Food Security. Among his recent works include two books GATT to WTO: Seeds of Despair and In the Famine Trap.