Only Chess Forum

Game Game 6411006 I just had lost.
But then I rambled, that I would just make just some further moves until I resign.

And then he took my queen.

And a New York second later ( Terry Pratched called that the shortest messurable amount of time in universe, the time between the traffic lights in New York go green and the taxi driver behind you honks like mad ) I moved Nxa7#

Originally posted by afxGame Game 6411006 I just had lost.
But then I rambled, that I would just make just some further moves until I resign.

And then he took my queen.

And a New York second later ( Terry Pratched called that the shortest messurable amount of time in universe, the time between the traffic lights in New York go green and the taxi driver behind you honks like mad ) I moved Nxa7#

Is that fair?
Is that allowed?

Look at it this way. You're providing a valuable lesson for your opponent.

Originally posted by afxGame Game 6411006 I just had lost.
But then I rambled, that I would just make just some further moves until I resign.

And then he took my queen.

And a New York second later ( Terry Pratched called that the shortest messurable amount of time in universe, the time between the traffic lights in New York go green and the taxi driver behind you honks like mad ) I moved Nxa7#

Is that fair?
Is that allowed?

In the words of Al Bundy, abso-freakin-lutely.

Especially if the player is 500 points lower rated. You could probably win even if you gave odds of a piece at the start of the game.

Although it would have been more impressive if you weren't nearly 500 points above your opponent in ratings. How'd you fall so far behind him in material when you were so much stronger a player than he? That's a more curious matter.

Originally posted by MahoutYou mean you sent a message saying you were thinking of resigning when you knew there was
a surprise check mate? And the message was intended to lull your opponent into a false sense of security?