June
21, 2005

Minutes

The
Andover City Planning Commission met for a regular meeting on Tuesday, June
21, 2005 at 909 N. Andover Road in the Andover Civic Center. Chairman Clark
Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Commission Members present
were Lynn Heath, Jan Cox, Jeff Syrios, and Charlotte Bass. Others in
attendance were Zoning Administrator Les Mangus, Administrative Secretary Deborah Carroll, and City Clerk/Administrator Jeff Bridges and City Council Liaison Caroline
Hale. Commission Members David Martine, Quentin Coon, Ron Roberts were
absent.

Call
to Order

Review
the minutes of the May 17, 2005 Planning Commission meeting.

Lynn
Heath made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Charlotte Bass
seconded the motion. Motion carried 4/0/1 with Jeff Syrios abstaining because
he was absent from that meeting.

Review the minutes of the May
17, 2005 Planning Commission meeting.

Communications:

Review the City Council minutes from the May 10, 2005
and May 31, 2005 meetings. The minutes were received and filed.

Review the minutes of the June 7, 2005 Site Plan
Review Committee Meeting. The minutes were received and filed.

Review the minutes of the May 10, 2005 Subdivision
Committee meeting. The minutes were received and filed.

Clark Nelson thanked Caroline Hale for her attendance
and input at the Planning Commission meetings.

Jeff Syrios made a motion to approve the appointments
for Subdivision Committee. Lynn Heath seconded the motion. Motion carried
5/0.

Communications:

SU-2005-02:
Public Hearing on an application for Special Use to establish a Public
Post-Secondary Education Facility in the I-1 Industrial District at 715 E. 13th
Street, Andover, Kansas. Chairman
Nelson opened the Public Hearing and asked for a report from the Zoning
Administrator.

Les
Mangus said this application for Special Usefor a Post-secondary
Education Facility at 715 E. 13th Street is an addition to the
special use granted in 2003 for BCCC to convert the former Raytheon building
into classrooms. His opinion of this conversion of prime industrial property
to non-taxable educational facilities remains that there is no value to the
Community in creating an incompatible college campus in the middle of the
industrial area that has taken 40 years to build. With that said, the
previous special use set a precedence to allow this expansion to consume the
remainder of the existing building. The previous public hearing concluded
with an approval that limited the use to a portion of the existing building,
and a fair warning that to expect zoning for expansion beyond the existing
building would be frowned on. There was a copy of the minutes in the packet
for that previous case for the Planning Commission review.

Dr.
Jackie Vieti, President of Butler Community College at 901 S. Haverhill Road,
El Dorado, Kansas, said 2 years ago the school acquired 60,000 square feet
of space on 13th Street. She said their future need is for
additional space for general education classroom space, and 2 technical
programs will be moved from the El Dorado campus to Andover. They also plan
to centralize the information technology programs within the expanded
facility.

Clark
Nelson asked about Butler Community College’s long term goals with respect to
13th & 21st locations. Dr. Vieti said the intention
is to consolidate the locations to be under 2 roofs instead of 3. They think
it is in the best interest of the City of Andover to return some of the
college owned property to commercial use. The expansion on 13th Street would allow the portable classrooms on the 21st Street
location to be eliminated. Eventually the 10,000 square foot building
permanent building would be vacated that is on the northeast corner of 21st Street. She said she is not sure of the length of time the school district
will allow them to stay in the facility adjacent to the high school.

Clark
Nelson asked about the increase in the number of employees expected for this
expansion project. Dr. Vieti said as the result of the occupation of 13th Street, 11 full time faculty positions were added and additional support
staff. This expansion will add 2 full time faculty members immediately as
well as support staff. She said this expansion will add between 350 and 500
new students.

Clark
Nelson asked about the comfort level of having school students located within
an industrial area. Dr. Vieti explained community colleges are being turned
to for work force development purposes. She thinks this makes this an ideal
relationship which is supported in theory by several communities. She said
the plan for Butler Community College in Andover was to build a
multi-building campus on the land they own on the southeast corner of Andover Road and 21st Street, but after further consideration, the 13th Street facility is more efficient and less costly to occupy.

Clark
Nelson asked if the safety of the students is in question in an industrial
zoned area. Dr. Vieti said this is not a concern.

Lynn
Heath asked if the school expansion will only be inside the existing Raytheon
building. Dr. Vieti said there are 3 buildings in the complex. The north
building will be expanded and will use a portion of the existing building on
the south. The college is in the process of acquiring the second building on
a long-term lease and the third building which is a 10,000 square foot stand
alone building. She said they also envision construction of an advanced
technology center which will also be a perfect fit for the industrial area
paid for with private resources.

Clark
Nelson asked if the special use request is for the building or for the
20-acre site. Les Mangus said the legal description is very complex and
consumes the existing buildings and adjacent parking. The portion published
is only for Tract #5.

Vince
Haines from Prigmore, Krevins, Haines, & Limon Architects P.A., 101 S.
Star, El Dorado, Kansas, and designer for this facility explained the history
of this property. He said Tract #6 is not included in this request, and is an
oversight on his part. Vince Haines said he would like to amend the
application to include Tract #6. Les Mangus said that change cannot be made
without the proper notices. Dr. Vieti said Tract #6 is not critical to the current
plan of the school. They plan to sub-lease it to the current occupant (Sleep
Apnea Co.).

Jeff
Syrios asked for the name of the current owner. Dr. Vieti said the college
has signed a long-term lease agreement with Carl Solomon who agrees with the
plans for this property. Jeff Syrios said this school in the Industrial zoned
area is not consistent with the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City
of Andover. He also is concerned about a buffer between the Industrial zoning
to Single-Family dwellings. Dr. Vieti said this sharing of Industrial
property is part of a national trend of partnership for training with
industrial employees. She said this cohabitation would bring businesses to
the area for convenience of training. Jeff Syrios said this may keep out
some industrial prospects. Dr. Vieti said this building has been vacant for a
long time and she thinks the occupancy of the school and improvements they
will make is an asset to the city.

Jeff
Syrios asked if the future plan of the school is to vacate the facility on 21st
and Andover Road, the building connected to the high school will remain, and
the 13th Street facility will be totally occupied.

Jan
Cox asked if the property on the southeast corner of Andover Road and 21st
would be sold. Dr. Vieti said they plan to sell it, especially the frontage
which has far greater value to the City of Andover for commercial development.
She said the Board has not decided whether to sell the entire property.

Jeff
Syrios asked Les for his opinion on this request. Les Mangus said he is
opposed to this request because the city would never plan to put a group of
students in an industrial park especially if there were aspirations of growth
in the industrial park to the east. He recognized the special use has already
been approved for half of the building now; it is too late to call it back.

Lynn
Heath asked if this is hampering the growth of the industrial park and how
many lots are still available for development. Les said there are 2 lots
available along 13th Street, 1 which is owned by Sherwin Williams,
the other owned by Mr. Solomon (Tract 1), and the remainder of the
undeveloped Andover Industrial Park which is +/- 60 acres. There was further
discussion about development of the industrial property.

Jeff
Syrios asked if an industrial site could be built on Tract #5 of this
property. Les explained that Tract #5 encompasses the portion of the building
that the college wants to use now. Tract #6 is a small building that is
trapped in the middle of the college so the potential for industrial use is
not good. The property that is requesting the special use permit is subject
to the lease by the college which will include all of Tract 5.

Hearing
no further public comment in favor or opposition of this application,
Chairman Nelson closed the public comment and reviewed the Rezoning Report.

SU-2005-02: Public Hearing
on an application for Special Use to establish a Public Post-Secondary
Education Facility in the I-1 Industrial District at 715 E. 13th
Street

ANDOVER CITY
PLANNING COMMISSION

Agenda
Item No. 5

REZONING REPORT *

CASE
NUMBER:

SU-2005-02

APPLICANT/AGENT:

Butler Community College

REQUEST:

Special Use to allow the expansion of the Post-Secondary Education
Facility in the I-1 Industrial district.

CASE
HISTORY:

BCCC already occupies a portion of this existing building.

LOCATION:

715 E. 13th

SITE
SIZE:

20.1 acres

PROPOSED
USE:

BCCC classrooms in the remainder of the existing building.

ADJACENT ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE:

North:

I-1
Industrial- Sherwin Williams factory

South:

I-1
Industrial- vacant Andover Industrial Park

East:

Butler
County Agriculture- 80 acre farmstead

West:

I-1
Industrial- vacant land

Background Information:

*
Note: This report is to assist the Planning Commission to determine
their findings from the evidence presented at the hearing so as to base
their rezoning recommendation on the required 17 factors found in Section
11-100 H of the Zoning Regulations. The responses provided need to be
evaluated with the evidence and reworded as necessary to reflect the
Planning Commission’s considered opinion. Sample motions are provided to
ensure the accuracy of the motion and facilitate the summary of the hearing
for the minutes. Conditions attached to the motion, if any, should be
carefully worded to provide instructions to the applicant and facilitate enforcement
by the Zoning Administrator.

(As
per Article 11, Section 100 of the City of Andover Zoning Regulation –
1993)

H.

Amendments
to Change Zoning Districts. When a proposed amendment would result in a
change of the zoning district classification of any specific property, the
report of the Planning Commission, accompanied by a summary of the hearing,
shall contain statements as to (1) the present and proposed district
classifications, (2) the applicant’s reasons for seeking such
reclassification, and (3) a statement of the factors where relevant upon
which the recommendation of the Commission is based using the following
factors as guidelines:

FACTORS AND FINDINGS:

YES

NO

1.What is the character of
the subject property and in the surrounding neighborhood in relation to
existing uses and their condition?

STAFF:

Noted on page 1 of this rezoning report

PLANNING:

Clark Nelson said this was approved in 2003 and it is
too late to change it now.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

2.What is the current
zoning of the subject property and that of the surrounding neighborhood in
relation to the requested zoning change?

STAFF:

Noted on page 1 of this rezoning report

PLANNING:

Concur- Lynn Heath said this will be a buffer between
the adjacent single-family home and the industrial park.

Les Mangus said that due to the creek in the
floodplain, the area does not lend itself to any development. 100 yds. from
the college property to Republican Run Creek.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

3.Is the length of time
that the subject property has remained undeveloped or vacant as zoned a
factor in the consideration?

x

STAFF:

x

PLANNING:

The industrial park has not developed as quickly as
anticipated.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

4.Would the request correct
an error in the application of these regulations?

x

STAFF:

x

PLANNING:

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

5.Is the request caused by changed or changing
conditions in the area of the subject property and, if so, what is the
nature and significance of such changed or changing conditions?

x

STAFF:

Raytheon moved out of the building & BCCC occupies
+/- 1/3 of the existing building now.

x

PLANNING:

Concur

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

6.Do adequate sewage
disposal and water supply and all other necessary public facilities
including street access exist or can they be provided to serve the uses
that would be permitted on the subject property?

x

STAFF:

All are in place and adequate.

x

PLANNING:

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

7.Would the subject
property need to be platted or replatted in lieu of dedications made for
rights-of-way, easements access control or building setback lines?

x

STAFF:

Dedication of 13th Street right-of-way to
50’ ½ street required.

x

PLANNING:

Concur. Les said today the street has a 35’ dedication
and the minimum standard is 50’. The applicant said this is not a problem.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

8.Would a screening plan be
necessary for existing and/or potential uses of the subject property?

x

STAFF:

x

PLANNING:

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

9.Is suitable vacant land
or buildings available or not available for development that currently has
the same zoning as is requested?

x

STAFF:

x

PLANNING:

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

10.If the request is for
business or industrial uses, are such uses needed to provide more services
or employment opportunities?

STAFF:

BCCC enrollment continues to grow.

PLANNING:

Concur.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

11.Is the subject property
suitable for the uses in the current zoning to which it has been
restricted?

x

STAFF:

The use of a portion of the existing building by BCCC
makes it less desirable for industrial users.

x

PLANNING:

Concur.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

12.To what extent would
removal of the restrictions, i.e., the approval of the zoning request
detrimentally affect other property in the neighborhood?

x

STAFF:

No detriment is perceived.

x

PLANNING:

Concur.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

13.Would the request be
consistent with the purpose of the zoning district classification and the
intent and purpose of these regulations?

x

STAFF:

The I-1 District is intended for light industrial
uses.

x

PLANNING:

Concur.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

14.Is the request in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and does it further enhance the
implementation of the Plan?

x

STAFF:

No expansions of BCCC are mentioned. The plan
generally promotes growth of the industrial job base.

x

PLANNING:

Concur

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

15.What is the support or
opposition to the request?

x

STAFF:

None at this time.

PLANNING:

None at this time.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

16.Is there any information
or are there recommendations on this request available from knowledgeable
persons which would be helpful in its evaluation?

STAFF:

This application completes the conversion of a viable
industrial site to an incompatible use, which will eventually be surrounded
by industrial users.

PLANNING:

Concur.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

17.If the request was not
approved, would this result in a relative gain to the public health, safety
and general welfare which would outweigh the loss in property value to or
the hardship experienced by, the applicant?

STAFF:

The public gains additional educational opportunities
and loses industrial jobs and tax base.

PLANNING:

Concur

COUNCIL:

Having considered the evidence at the hearing and
the factors to evaluate the rezoning application, I Charlotte Bass, move
that we recommend to the Governing Body that Case No. SU-2005-02 be
modified & approved to allow the expansion of the Post-Secondary
Education Facility in the I-1 Industrial District based on the findings of
the Planning Commission numbers 5, 6, 7, 10. 12, and 15 in support as
recorded in the summary of this hearing and that the following conditions
be attached to this recommendation:

Contingent upon the right-of-way dedication.

Motion seconded by Lynn Heath. There was further
discussion about a formal connection between the school and the industries.
Motion carried 5/0.

Z-2005-04:
Public Hearing on proposed change of zoning district classification from the
R-1 Single-Family Residential District to the B-1 Office Business District at
1139 N. Andover Road, Andover, Kansas. Chairman Nelson opened the Public Hearing and asked for a report from
the Zoning Administrator.

Les
Mangus said this application for change in zoning district classification is
adjacent to vacant business property already owned by the applicant in an
effort to put together a site with enough Andover Road frontage to support a
reasonably sized office building. The previous public hearing for the
adjacent property concluded that the change was compatible with surrounding
properties and in conformance with the comprehensive plan’s objectives to
look at each request to convert residential property along Andover Rd on a case by case basis. Staff supports approval of the application.

Dave
Rathbone of Venture Enterprises said he currently owns the property adjacent
to the north with Dr. David Foley. He said he purchased the subject property
at 1139 N. Andover Road about a month ago. He showed the Planning Commission
a site plan sketch of the office building that has a residential flair he
hopes to build. He said this office building will be occupied with an
accounting firm, and an oil firm. Both of these businesses will have a small
number of employees. He said the existing home on the site is planned to be
moved to the back lot and remodel the home and sell it. That home would then
face Main Street.

Dave
Rathbone said the property adjacent to the west is just a garage with fishing
boats in it. There is no residence on it.

Hearing
no further public comment in favor or opposition of this application,
Chairman Nelson closed the public comment and reviewed the Rezoning Report.

Z-2005-04: Public
Hearing on proposed change of zoning district classification from the R-1
Single-Family Residential District to the B-1 Office Business District at 1139 N. Andover Road

ANDOVER CITY
PLANNING COMMISSION

Agenda
Item No. 6

REZONING REPORT *

CASE
NUMBER:

Z-2005-04

APPLICANT/AGENT:

Venture Enterprises

REQUEST:

Change of zoning district classification from R-1 Single-Family
residential to B-1 Office Business District.

CASE
HISTORY:

Existing single family residence

LOCATION:

1139 N. Andover Road

SITE
SIZE:

99.97’ x 156’ = 15,595.32 sq. ft.

PROPOSED
USE:

+/- 5,000 sq. ft. office building

ADJACENT ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE:

North:

B-2
Neighborhood Business- vacant land owned by applicant

South:

R-1
Single-Family Residential- existing residence

East:

B-6
Business District- Treescapes nursery & landscape contractor

West:

R-1
Single-Family Residential- existing storage buildings

Background Information:

The applicant owns the adjacent vacant property to
the north and desires to expand the area zoned for the construction of an
office building.

*
Note: This report is to assist the Planning Commission to determine
their findings from the evidence presented at the hearing so as to base
their rezoning recommendation on the required 17 factors found in Section
11-100 H of the Zoning Regulations. The responses provided need to be
evaluated with the evidence and reworded as necessary to reflect the
Planning Commission’s considered opinion. Sample motions are provided to
ensure the accuracy of the motion and facilitate the summary of the hearing
for the minutes. Conditions attached to the motion, if any, should be
carefully worded to provide instructions to the applicant and facilitate
enforcement by the Zoning Administrator.

(As
per Article 11, Section 100 of the City of Andover Zoning Regulation –
1993)

H.

Amendments
to Change Zoning Districts. When a proposed amendment would result in a
change of the zoning district classification of any specific property, the
report of the Planning Commission, accompanied by a summary of the hearing,
shall contain statements as to (1) the present and proposed district
classifications, (2) the applicant’s reasons for seeking such
reclassification, and (3) a statement of the factors where relevant upon
which the recommendation of the Commission is based using the following
factors as guidelines:

FACTORS AND FINDINGS:

YES

NO

1.What is the character of
the subject property and in the surrounding neighborhood in relation to
existing uses and their condition?

STAFF:

Noted on page 1 of this rezoning report

PLANNING:

Concur.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

2.What is the current
zoning of the subject property and that of the surrounding neighborhood in
relation to the requested zoning change?

STAFF:

Noted on page 1 of this rezoning report

PLANNING:

Concur.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

3.Is the length of time
that the subject property has remained undeveloped or vacant as zoned a
factor in the consideration?

x

STAFF:

x

PLANNING:

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

4.Would the request correct
an error in the application of these regulations?

x

STAFF:

x

PLANNING:

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

5.Is the request caused by changed or changing
conditions in the area of the subject property and, if so, what is the
nature and significance of such changed or changing conditions?

x

STAFF:

x

PLANNING:

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

6.Do adequate sewage
disposal and water supply and all other necessary public facilities
including street access exist or can they be provided to serve the uses
that would be permitted on the subject property?

x

STAFF:

Water & street exist and sewer can be extended to
the subject property.

x

PLANNING:

Clark Nelson asked if this property is subject to the
current sanitary sewer. Les Mangus said the sewer main is on Main Street. Properties that face Andover Road have a service lateral that comes off of Main Street and connects. This should be a condition of approval for the property to be
platted so that this is a lot and that a sanitary sewer public main be
extended up to service the Andover Road properties vs. the service lateral.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

7.Would the subject
property need to be platted or replatted in lieu of dedications made for
rights-of-way, easements access control or building setback lines?

x

STAFF:

Right-of-way dedications are in place.

x

PLANNING:

Concur

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

8.Would a screening plan be
necessary for existing and/or potential uses of the subject property?

x

STAFF:

Screening of adjacent residential properties would be
required.

x

PLANNING:

Concur.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

9.Is suitable vacant land
or buildings available or not available for development that currently has
the same zoning as is requested?

x

STAFF:

Both vacant land and buildings are available in the
area.

x

PLANNING:

Concur

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

10.If the request is for
business or industrial uses, are such uses needed to provide more services
or employment opportunities?

x

STAFF:

Relocation of existing expanding businesses.

x

PLANNING:

Concur

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

11.Is the subject property
suitable for the uses in the current zoning to which it has been
restricted?

x

STAFF:

The desirability of residential properties adjacent to
Andover Road has decreased with increased traffic.

x

PLANNING:

Clark Nelson said this proposed use of this property
is consistent with the Comprehensive Development Plan.

Lynn Heath said the property along the road is less
conducive to R-1 because of the traffic.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

12.To what extent would
removal of the restrictions, i.e., the approval of the zoning request
detrimentally affect other property in the neighborhood?

x

STAFF:

Increased traffic, lighting, activity, etc. created by
normal business operations.

x

PLANNING:

Concur. Clark Nelson said that in the long run, this
will improve the neighborhood as well as the city.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

13.Would the request be
consistent with the purpose of the zoning district classification and the
intent and purpose of these regulations?

x

STAFF:

x

PLANNING:

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

14.Is the request in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and does it further enhance the
implementation of the Plan?

x

STAFF:

Case by case review of commercial applications along Andover Road.

x

PLANNING:

Concur. Clark Nelson said this neighborhood was
discussed during the update of the Comprehensive Development Plan and it
was decided that this area from 10th Street north was in need of
some modernization.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

15.What is the support or
opposition to the request?

STAFF:

None at this time.

PLANNING:

None at this time.

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

16.Is there any information
or are there recommendations on this request available from knowledgeable
persons which would be helpful in its evaluation?

STAFF:

Approval as applied for.

PLANNING:

None

COUNCIL:

YES

NO

17.If the request was not
approved, would this result in a relative gain to the public health, safety
and general welfare which would outweigh the loss in property value to or
the hardship experienced by, the applicant?

STAFF:

PLANNING:

Clark Nelson said this would not be conducive to
improving the general welfare by denial of the application.

COUNCIL:

Having considered the evidence at the hearing and
the factors to evaluate the rezoning application, I Lynn Heath, move that
we recommend to the Governing Body that Case No. Z-2005-04 be approved to
change the zoning district classification from the R-1 Single-Family
Residential District to the B-1 Office Business District based on the
findings of the Planning Commission 6, 10, 12, 13, & 14 as recorded in
the summary of this hearing. Motion seconded by Jeff Syrios. Motion carried
5/0.

Les Mangus said both of the cases tonight will be heard
for final approval by the City Council on July 12, 2005.

Annual Review of the Comprehensive Development Plan.

Les Mangus stated that State Law requires the Planning
Commission review the Comprehensive Plan annually to check for gross changes
in the community and to record the changes to use during the next update
process.

Clark Nelson said having a school use allowed within an
industrial area should be studied.

Les Mangus said the plan is flexible. He said this was
an existing facility which would have been easy for another industry to come
in and just change the name on the front.

Jan Cox asked if the college is a taxable entity. Jeff
Bridges said that for now it is. He said the owner of the property is paying
taxes as is the school district because it is a leased facility. After the
conditions of the lease are met the college will own the building.

Clark Nelson asked if the 21st and Andover Road area continues to develop as commercial.

Jeff Bridges explained the reason for having industrial
property is to offer well paying jobs, increase the technical proficiency of
the community, and to bring people to the community. The college is bringing
more people to Andover than any industry could, the jobs are mostly full-time
with upper end administrative or clerical positions, it just does not inspire
the sale of houses.

Les said the Planning Commission now recognizes they
have 20 acres of college in an industrial park, that the college eventually
plans to move out the 21st Street and Andover Road location. The
development of the hospital and medical offices along 21st Street
could have significant influence on the type of businesses that move into
that area.

Clark Nelson asked Les if there were any changes to the
city on the south or east sides that needs to be noted. Les said all the
improvements to Hwy. 54 and the intersection of Kellogg and Andover Road with the commercial development of the area are already mentioned in the plan.

Jeff Bridges said there is a seminar about partnerships
with industries hosted by Butler Community College and IBM on Tuesday to
train students on IBM business systems. This will be held at the 13th Street campus.

Lynn Heath said Butler Community College is also in a
partnership with Emporia State University to bring a 4-year education program
into Butler Community College.

Charlotte
Bass- Would appreciate more
information about the procedural fundamentals of the zoning and BZA process
from beginning to end.

Clark
Nelson- Said he appreciated the
communication between staff and the Planning Commission.

Caroline Hale- Said she
appreciated the working relationship between the City Council and the
Planning Commission.

Member
Items

Lynn
Heath made a motion to recess the meeting at 8:27 p.m. until 6:00 p.m. on
July 19, 2005 for a workshop session before the regularly scheduled meeting. Charlotte
Bass seconded the motion. Motion carried 5/0.

Adjournment

Respectfully
Submitted by

__________________________

Deborah
Carroll

Administrative
Secretary

Approved this 19th day
of July 2005 by the Andover City Planning Commission/ Board of Zoning
Appeals, City of Andover.