“Man is something that shall be overcome.Man is a rope,tied between beast and overman - a rope over an abyss.What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not an end.”-- Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra
--Nothing scientific can be racist and nothing racist can be scientific.
(c)2000-2017 CM PRESS.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Saturday, December 30, 2017

Maybe. We'll have to wait until mid January to see if this is going to happen. With enough thought and money put into this it could be great. If done on s shoe string and not fully thought out, it will probably fail.
# # #RACE REALISM EXPLAINED

Monday, December 25, 2017

This article in the OC REGISTER grabbed me because a couple of years ago I read some of the staff reports that she had written and was so impressed that I wrote a message to her and others complimenting her on doing it right.

Unlike many other staff reports that you'll see, hers are not full of useless eye wash and meaningless throat clearing.

She tells you what she is writing about, she writes it, and then tells you what she wrote. Very concise. Answers all the who, why, what, where, when, and sometimes how questions you might have.
# # #

Thursday, December 21, 2017

Here's the important thing about both the written and video report on this attack on a WHITE PERSON. Notice how there is absolutely no description given of the attacker. Why do you suppose that's the case? Right. It is because the attacker is more than likely a Negro.

The MSM constantly try to hide the race of violent criminals when they are non-White and especially if they are Black to try to convince easily suggestible Whites that violent crime is an equal opportunity employer. It isn't. Not by a long shot.

An all White community is a safe, peaceful and nice community. Diversity is not our greatest strength, it is our greatest witness.
# # #

Friday, December 15, 2017

Omarosa: "I have seen things [in the White House] that have...upset me...that has (sic) affected my [Black] community and my [Black] people."
Turn it around and you know the PC types and the White haters would make this a big story if someone White was leaving the White House and spoke about their [White] community and their [White] people.

Tuesday, December 12, 2017

If it was a holiday for non-Jewish Whites seeking to jump out of the melting pot and have their own culture and not be assimilated it would be called that. Here's one of our essays that we've published before about the real meaning of Hanukkah. You be the judge. Substitute Whites for Jews and imagine what anti-White bigots might be saying about it.

WHAT HANUKKAH IS REALLY ABOUT

Judah Maccabee

Antiochus IV Epiphanes of Syria, a ruler who sought to end conflict among people, tried to make his empire a peaceful place by eradicating differences among the diverse groups in his empire (sound familiar?).

This well-intentioned or evil ruler, depending on your point of view, wanted all people to have one religion (his religion) so that there would be no religious disputes. He also wanted all people to have one culture (his) so there would be no cultural disputes, and he wanted all people to be of one race (his) so there would be no racial disputes. His solution was to create a great melting pot (familiar concept, isn't it?) where various minority peoples--and especially the Jews--would be assimilated into his brave new world.

A few "extremist" Jews (i.e., those who didn't agree) said "No thanks, we like ourselves just as we are." These grassroots "extremists," led by Judah Maccabee, a peasant, resisted blending in, and they were hated and reviled as what we would now call "racists," "bigots," "extremists," "separatists," supremacists," etc., and, to coin a term, "judeocentric."

Not all Jews helped Maccabee. In fact, the elites of Jewish society favored the blending away of the Jews (much as our modern elites favor the blending away of whites) and they helped the tyrant in his attempt at assimilation.

The "extremist" Maccabees, weren't having it and they fought against both the Syrian tyrant and their own Jewish elites. In time, the Maccabees won, and Jews who didn't assimilate, became the only Jews, and they celebrated their victory over the forces of assimilation with Hanukkah.

So, Hanukkah was about Jews being able to have their own identity and religion as they themselves decided was right for themselves, and it was a struggle against their extinction by assimilation.

There are lessons in Hanukkah for both modern Jews and non-Jews alike.

In this 2013 column from linked Daily Pilot column, HERE, you'll see parallels being drawn between the ancient Jews and their struggle for their religion and identity and the Pilgrims who came to America to preserve their religion and their identity.

It may be time for more Maccabees and more Pilgrims, because the forces that want to blend all nations, all religions and all races together are working overtime to accomplish that.

But, for those of us who believe that distinct races, nations and religions have a right to exist as they choose to exist and to remain separate and have their own self-identification and self-determination without interference from other races, nations and religions, it is evil.

Read between the lines: There are mechanisms of evolution that are not fully understood in which genes (and prions and even non-living codes of so called inanimate objects) can be inserted into the genomes of what we call living organisms.

Everything in existence has codes that make whatever it is, what it is. Those codes can sometimes be transferred to other things in existence. In living organisms the codes for life are found in DNA and RNA. But all chemicals also have their own codes.
# # #

A little understanding of science, along with proper beliefs, can help us understand the ways of existence and our place in it and may strengthen our faith in the importance of DNA, and help us stay on the path to our highest possible destiny.

50,000 years ago--A few humans leave Africa for Europe and Asia and keep evolving.

20,000years ago--White people begin emerging in Europe.

5,000years ago--White people become dominant and virtually only type in Europe.

4,000 years ago--Recorded history begins.

White Mutants

Scientists believe that a tiny mutation in gene slc24a5, located on the long leg of chromosome 15 at position 21.1, started in the few people who left Africa and headed into Europe about 50,000 years ago was a major reason for the emergence of white skin.

White skin allowed in more sunlight and helped with the production of more Vitamin D than darker skin, and prevented rickets. This mutation became the norm in Europe 5,300 to 12,000 years ago. This gene has primary alleles that differ in only one nucleotide, changing the 111th amino acid from alanine to threonine. In White European descended peoples, the threonine form is found in from 98.7% to 100% of the population while in Africans, East Asians and American Indians from 93% to 100% of the populations have the alanine form.

Many other mutations occurred among this new subspecies as these people moved out of Africa. And that, dear friends, is how White people came to be.

What about mutations?

Up until recent years it was thought that mutations were few and that most were catastrophic for those humans who received mutated genes. Now, it is known that mutations occur all the time. Most are very minor and cause no harm. If they provide a survival advantage (like white skin in less sunny lands) these mutated genes eventually may become fixed in the population and replace the non-mutated versions.

Some of these mutations are caused by cosmic rays (subatomic particles) that change the DNA sequence, and some are caused by temperature and other more common environmental agents and forces.

DNA PRIMER

Remember, all DNA is the same for all living things that we know about. That is, all DNA is composed of four chemicals that are abbreviated A, T, C, G. These chemicals are then shuffled by nature to make a blade of grass or a man.

Humans have approximately 3.1 billion combinations of these four letters in their genotype. These are further organized into 46 chromosomes and the chromosomes carry the 20,000 to 30,000 genes that make us as we are. The genes carry the instructions for producing a new organism in all its parts.

During mating, 23 chromosomes from the male join with 23 chromosomes from the female to create a new child.

If members of a species are isolated from others of the species for a long enough time, those who are isolated may become a new species no longer capable of breeding with the old species. But if the isolation is removed before specieshood, those who were on their way to being a new species may blend back in with the masses of the species.

Saturday, December 9, 2017

"From an evolutionary perspective, individuals have a vi- tal interest in the reproduction of their genes. Yet this interest is overlooked by social and political theory at a time when we need to steer an adaptive course through the unnatural modern world of uneven population growth and decline, global mobility, and loss of family and communal ties. In modern Darwinian theory, bearing children is only one way to reproduce. Since we share genes with our families, ethnic groups, and the species as a whole, ethnocentrism and humanism can be adaptive. They can also be hazardous when taken to extremes. On Genetic Interests canvasses strategies and ethics for conserving our genetic interests in an environmentally sustainable manner sensitive to the interests of others."--From the AMAZON.COM description of the book.# # #NICE DEFINITION OF EPIGENETICS BURIED IN THIS NEW STORY ABOUT SUSPECTED GAY GENESMy words here: Epigenetics is the study of what happens to our genetic endowment after we are born. In other words, there are internal and external environmental factors that "highlight" certain aspects of our genes and not others.# # #

"Indeed, study of the thousands of subspecies of native wild mammals has led to the formulation of the biological law concerning them that:Two subspecies of the same species do not occur in the same geographic area.Of the half dozen or fewer exceptions reported to date, reinvestigation has shown that the two kinds instead were in every instance full species, or two subspecies that lived each in a habitat apart from the other. Thus the rule remains almost or quite without exception and it should give pause to anyone about to advocate the long continued residence together of subspecies of man."

Thursday, December 7, 2017

The Daily Stormer reminds me of some of the underground newspapers from the '60's that outraged the establishment but from a left wing perspective, while The Daily Stormer does it from a right wing (read White Wing) perspective.

Haters of Whites and free speech keep trying to shut down The Daily Stormer, but so far the DS keeps showing up.
# # #

Some White women with emotional problems have a twisted Beauty and the Beast syndrome entwined with a Great White Mother Syndrome (similar to a Cat Lady Syndrome) and are easy victims.
# # #THE GATEWAY PUNDIT

This is turning into one of our favorite sites. Absolutely chock full of factual stories not covered by the MSM.

We'll keep checking this site and if it holds up, we'll put a permanent link to it over on the right.

We're also thinking of removing at least one of the present links you see over there because they aren't that great day in and day out.
# # #

I'm liking this site so much that I may soon add it as a permanent link. Lot's of great stuff and things keep moving. Very nice.
# # #EXCERPT FROM ON GENETIC INTERESTS BY FRANK SALTER

We ran this once before and we may run it many more times, because it clearly outlines the fact that we all have genetic interests and these interests are furthered the more of our genes there are in existence.

For our survival, expansion and evolution as White people we need to focus on our genetic interests and not get confused by thinking that all humans are exactly the same. The genetic interests of non-Whites are their interests not ours, and our genetic interests are not theirs.

Individuals might choose any purpose in life, including ones that prevent
their genes from being passed on to the next generation. However, maladaptive
choices tend to eliminate genes that contribute to those choices within prevailing
environments. Genes will not survive the organism in which they reside unless
they launch the organism on an adaptive life course — avoiding predators, me-
tabolising food, learning the local language, resisting parasites, finding mates
and, in social species, nurturing offspring and defending the kin group. The indi-
vidual phenotype is a survival vehicle constructed by a parliament of genes, each
cooperating to perpetuate itself. 2 This modern evolutionary view of humans (and
all other species) has been dramatically expressed by Richard Dawkins 3 : 'They
are in you and in me; they created us, body and mind; and their preservation is
the ultimate rationale for our existence. . . . [T]hey go by the name of genes, and
we are their survival machines.' Genes are not the ultimate rationale for any-
thing, of course, since only a proposition can perform that function. But the pro-
cess of genetic evolution is certainly the ultimate cause of our existence. Individ-
ual humans are links in a chain of life stretching back millions of generations of
human and prehuman species that managed to perpetuate their genes. A devel-
opmental program coded in the genes and enabled by the environment, guides
individual behaviour over the lifespan, for example by producing a distinctive
physiology and psychology. These 'proximate mechanisms' evolved due to the
ultimate cause of biological evolution — the process of differential survival and
reproduction of genomes within populations.

Still not catching on, Whitey? If not, read the story down below about a Brown person killing a White woman and having a jury say he's not guilty. One guesses it was not a White jury of peers of the murdered White woman but a jury of anti-Whites who are peers of the killer.

Reminds one of the OJ jury, does it not?
# # #REPLACE 10,000 ENGLISHMEN WITH 10,000 DANES AND THE GENETIC LOSS TO THE ENGLISH IS ONLY EQUIVALENT TO 167 ENGLISH CHILDRENREPLACE 10,000 ENGLISHMEN WITH 10,000 BANTUS AND THE GENETIC LOSS TO THE ENGLISH IS 10,854 ENGLISH CHILDREN

Read on to get the full explanation...

Salter notes that Englishmen and Danes, though the genetic distance between the two populations is not great, are nonetheless distinct. He calculates that if 10,000 Danes were to take the place of 10,000 Englishmen, the loss of genetic interests to the English would be equivalent to losing 167 English children (or siblings). Numerically speaking, the replacement of 10,000 Englishmen with 10,000 Danes is a loss of 10,000 Englishmen. Genetically speaking, it is a loss of only 167, because Danes are genetically similar to the English, so most of the English genes lost are shared by the Danes who replace them. Salter is not claiming that each and every Englishman loses the genetic equivalent of 167 children or siblings, but that the English people as a whole lose this number. Yet each and every Englishman is related to those who are lost. If, however, 10,000 Bantu immigrants replaced 10,000 Englishmen, the genetic equivalent of 10,854 English children or siblings would be lost. How does the loss due to replacement exceed the number of those replaced? Salter explains, “Some ethnies are so different genetically that they amount to negative stores of those distinct genes.”The above is from a review of ON GENETIC INTERESTS appearing in Counter Currents.# # #TRUMP'S TWEETS HERE
# # #

So far, the MSM don't seem to be reporting on the racial/ethnic makeup of the jury but you can probably bet it is similar to the OJ jury.

What is happening is that it is open season on Whites all across the planet. If you are paying attention you see it on college campuses, in the streets, in the courts and just about everyplace now.
# # #

The anti-Whites show how full of hate of Whites they are by making such a big deal over a very simple and honest message as It's Okay to be White.
# # #WHAT WE OWE OUR PEOPLE

Our repeat link to On Genetic Interests

A really good column about a book that says the same things I've been saying for many years.

The book is pricey and there don't appear to be many low price second hand ones on the market, but the column above gives a nice look at many of the major points that are made.

And, what are those points? Just that each of us has a genetic interest and that Whites too often seem to have been convinced that they don't have such an interest and that this can lead to our extinction unless we wake up and realize that what is most important about us, as with all living organisms, is our genes and that our main purpose in living is to increase the sheer number of our genes by any means possible and especially by reproducing ourselves by mating with those like us.

And as the book makes clear, if a White with no Black ancestry and a Black with no White ancestry mate and produce a child, both the White parent and the Black parent will be less related to their child than they are to their fellow Whites or Blacks who are purely White or Black.
# # #
EXCERPT FROM ON GENETIC INTERESTS BY FRANK SALTER

Individuals might choose any purpose in life, including ones that prevent
their genes from being passed on to the next generation. However, maladaptive
choices tend to eliminate genes that contribute to those choices within prevailing
environments. Genes will not survive the organism in which they reside unless
they launch the organism on an adaptive life course — avoiding predators, me-
tabolising food, learning the local language, resisting parasites, finding mates
and, in social species, nurturing offspring and defending the kin group. The indi-
vidual phenotype is a survival vehicle constructed by a parliament of genes, each
cooperating to perpetuate itself. 2 This modern evolutionary view of humans (and
all other species) has been dramatically expressed by Richard Dawkins 3 : 'They
are in you and in me; they created us, body and mind; and their preservation is
the ultimate rationale for our existence. . . . [T]hey go by the name of genes, and
we are their survival machines.' Genes are not the ultimate rationale for any-
thing, of course, since only a proposition can perform that function. But the pro-
cess of genetic evolution is certainly the ultimate cause of our existence. Individ-
ual humans are links in a chain of life stretching back millions of generations of
human and prehuman species that managed to perpetuate their genes. A devel-
opmental program coded in the genes and enabled by the environment, guides
individual behaviour over the lifespan, for example by producing a distinctive
physiology and psychology. These 'proximate mechanisms' evolved due to the
ultimate cause of biological evolution — the process of differential survival and
reproduction of genomes within populations.

Baltimore is dying. Whites are fleeing as fast as they can pack their bags. Tourists are now not going there. The problem: The city is too Black. As long as it remains too Black, it will be full of Black violence. Genes are us and genes are them.
# # #A VOICE OF HATE IN AMERICA'S HEARTLAND