Although the term is alignment is typically associated with morphosyntactic expression of arguments of the Clause, alignment
is also relevant to units of the Phrase. In Functional Discourse Grammar a basic distinction is made between two kinds of
dependency relations obtaining both within Phrases and within Clauses: head-modifier relations and nucleus-dependent relations.
This paper investigates the alignment of nominal units within different types of Phrases and Clauses on the basis of this
distinction in a sample of twenty-six languages. It is demonstrated that of the six logically possible main alignment types,
five are observed in the data. One alignment pattern is not attested, as there is no language which aligns modifiers within
Phrases in the same way as arguments within Clauses, while aligning arguments within Phrases in a different way. In other
words, if modifiers within Phrases are aligned in the same way as arguments within Clauses, arguments within Phrases also
receive the same treatment. This outcome strongly supports the unique distinction in dependency relations made by Functional
Discourse Grammar and the relevance of this distinction in Phrasal alignment across the world’s languages.

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let
the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible
and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
You will be contacted as soon as possible.