Please note the latest reports are directly
below and the earliest right at the bottom

Remember the Goodhouse project company
that was liquidated by the Land Bank? The 100 % Land Bank Financed PPP project
subsidised (10%) by Land Redistribution Agricultural Development Grants. The
one where the proposed beneficiaries never got transfer of their shares in the
company or the land. The project that was based on a communist kibbutz system
that discriminated against all non-ANC voters. Where the ANC imported their
voters to work the land. Well, the Land Bank called a meeting of creditors in
Springbok. Only the ANC workers were notified. The non ANC members that have
occupied and worked the land for the last 30 years were excluded as were all
other creditors that they knew had claims. What is more is that the Minister
for land Affairs in the Northern Cape is to visit the area the day after the
meeting but the advisors of the non ANC members were not notified – again.

As to the president’s office getting
back to me. Countless phone messages to the Advocate (Vilikasi) nominated in
the letter as the person dealing with the problem have all been ignored.

There can be no question now as to the
utterly discriminatory and highly criminal nature (against a non ANC coloured
community in this case) of the ANC’s dealing in the land reform process? That
simply takes the cake. And with so much impertinent arrogance to boot.

Posted 26 September 2005. In mid
September the author received a letter from the President’s office that
acknowledged his letter of 12 August and referring the matter to a female
advocate, one Vilikazi. On calling the number it was intercepted by a male
advocate who called himself Beghi and who said that the matter was referred to
him. He sounded vaguely conversant with the matter and said that he would
revert to me but that I must be patient because he had a backlog to deal with.
Since then nothing has happened. It was on the basis of the written response
that FNB bank agreed to pend the sale in execution of the Goodhouse leader’s
house until 30 October 2005. In the mean time of course, time is running out
for the elderly community leader and his wife. Soon they will be without a
place to stay.

In the mean time however, the government
has been very busy with other matters. Mr. Cloete advised me today that a new
water pipeline has been laid in Goodhouse at considerable cost. It will service
only the ANC supporters and not the members of his community of farmers though.
The fact that a new pipeline has to be laid when the government had spent R 15
mil on an agricultural pipeline but 6 years ago, proves the allegations that
the agricultural one was never meant to last and is now effectively written
off.

This is politically driven racism at its
most poignant of course. The message is unmistakably clear. Vote for us or
you will be starved out, your houses will be taken and in the end we will give
our supporters drinking water in the dessert in which you live while you are
left to move off the land (so that our supporters can take it) or die of thirst
– take your pick.

How low can this get? The next step will
be violence if other cases can be used as a measuring stick. Will the rest of
the world just look on. Probably, if Zimbabwe is anything to go by. I would
hate to be these leaders, the day they face God. God’s judgment will be for the
righteous and against the tyrants and it will last forever. There will be much
thirsting and gnashing of teeth, for a very, very long time.

FNB bank have
attached the house of the leader of the Goodhouse Community for a paltry sum of
less than R 30,000.00. From previous bulletins you will FNB were made fully
aware of the situation. Yet they are quite willing to be indirectly used by the
state to denude its opponents from their homes. Remember the state caused the
problem that left Mr. Cloete the Community leader without an income. The state
knew he would lose his house. FNB know what the state did. Yet, these two
appear to be working perfectly in concert with one another. Each equally as
cold and without feeling as the other.

If the leading
banking institutions tacitly support to such a heinous campaign of racial
hatred, then there appears to be little hope of any resolve. When a community
is so openly attacked by the state and it’s allies, what can it do but resort
to self defence in the most basic need for survival. If a non white community
is in this situation, can one blame the white community that has already been
described a victim of genocide by UN researches for adopting the methods used
by the ANC’s in struggle for freedom from racial oppression?

Wednesday, 24 August 2005. Instead of
reporting on the hard facts set out here the media gave a lot of coverage to
calls by far left communist demands that all agricultural land be owned by the
state and run on a communal basis.

Today the author was contacted by the
community leader at Goodhouse, Hendrik Cloete and told that they were informed
that the ANC had developed a project for their land costing R 5 mil in which
the ANC, the land bank and IDC were the shareholders, that there would be no
loans and that it will be run communally. Anyone not in the project will be
kicked off the land.

It is of course totally illegal and in
fact criminal to denude people of occupational rights established by Upgrading
of Tenure Rights Act. Moreover the government are overturning the results of a
democratically held elections regarding ownership in terms of the
Transformation Act. These are gross violations of the rights of people in a
democracy. This type of action is of course typical only of Communist states.

These are the hard, cold, cruel and
intensely disturbing facts. Facts that beg an answer from the world’s media, as
to why these facts are not being reported on. Could the rumours be true? Rumours
that the ANC allowed the SACP to agitate the masses to the point where they
feel justified to implement such a totalitarian regime? That the media and many
others are in fact in concert with this? For the full article see 5facts.htm

ØWednesday, 17 August 2005. Caught red handed! Take a look at the next link and
see how the National Department of Agriculture went through its records and
deleted E-mails I sent to them as far back as one year ago. They probably tried
to perpetuate the old lie that they never received anything and that their
empty records attests to that. The same lie just exposed at the President’s
office (see EmailstoPres.htmandHi
Robert.htm). They did not realise I had tagged the
messages.
There is the proof of what their Northern Cape Office bragged about to my
clients. They said they trash everything from their advisors. See it for
yourself here - NDAStonewall.htm.

ØTuesday, 16 August 2005 At around 10 p.m.I received an
E-mail from the person I was told was responsible for the President’s E-mails. AMAZING!
Read it and my response to it for yourself at the next link Hi Robert.htm.Remember
the E-mail being answered to are below the answer. Note, there are two.

ØMonday, 15 August 2005. On Friday the 12th ,
after spending the usual time getting the run-around, I finally managed to
leave a message for the administrative secretary of the President to see the
web page for the letter I sent. At about 10.am this morning I received a phone
call with protestations that the previous E-mails were never received. I
suggested I be sent anE-mail to which
I could reply and duly was sent one and in it, the e-mail address to the
president’s office (President@po.gov.za)
that I used in all previous correspondence was replied to by one Gary Brown. In other words,
despite all protestations to the contrary, that IS the right E-mail address, it
DEOS work and the E-mails WERE received! For full details of the ensuing
correspondence see the following link EmailstoPres.htm . It is only because of the first bit of media
reaction that we are seeing an admission but no answers to the important issues
yet. These are but the standard reactions expected of a President’s
administrative secretary. Many times before, these occur just to try and
diffuse a serious situation and then nothing further happens or it is sent to
various other departments that never get back. Please keep as much pressure on
this situation as possible. The questions are still unanswered. Let
us hope that there will now be some resolve in Goodhouse and full and frank
disclosure on the allegations that arose out of the volume of evidence in this
case.

ØFriday, 12 August 2005. The MEC of the Northern Cape is trying to bulldoze yetanother designed-to fail project through at
Goodhouse. As usual all the government wants is to scoop some more taxpayers
money for their friends. A local council member went so far as to say will be
another ANC project. The following letter to the President sets out the
details. It sets out the government’s
clandestine strategies in the land reform program and challenges him to answer the
letter. My guess is he will be unable to do so as the truth cannot be argued
against. After all they have already admitted most of it. The Deputy
President went so far as to let the cat out the bag when she stated that a lot can be learnt from how Zimbabwe did things. Its no joke, believe me. See the
letter to President 4.htm

ØWednesday, 10 August 2005 Dr. Izak Labuschagne’s commentary on the
land summit appears under the following link Summit.htmThis is important
reading as it shows how wealthy white South Africans are selling out on the
simple rural folk, the agricultural backbone of South Africa.

ØTuesday, 26 July 2005FNB have notified me that their actions are purely commercial and not
politically inspired. Hendrik Cloete, the leader of the Goodhouse Community
would never had fallen behind in his bond repayments if the Government had not
induced him into their “Star project” and then deliberately crashed it. Where
must this man of 70 go and live now? He cannot pay rent. He has lost his
transport to another purely commercial sorry we are not a political
organization, Wesbank (part of the FNB bank group). How easily the government
gets others to do their dirty work. And low down how dirty it is! Does being a
purely commercial financial institution in Africa mean one turns a blind eye to
humanitarian suffering while the rest of the world donates money to alleviate
human suffering? They tell me that only Hendrik has these problems. Sure, most
of the Goodhouse people live in reed houses along the river. The others built
their own houses over the years and paid them off. Hendrik was too busy helping
the community to look after himself. Now the community is broke and he is going
to be thrown out onto the streets. That is what you get if you vote for the
opposition in Africa. Pure commercial reality.

ØSaturday, 23 July 2005 Now that the pressure is really on government they have pulled out all
the harassment stops. First they influenced
First National Bank recommence their attempts at denuding the leaders of the
Goodhouse and Links Cloete’s communities of their houses. Remember Government infiltrated
their project and bankrupted them to start with.

üNext they used the legislation
that enables them to monitor all internet activity, monitored me, and at the
same time planted a very specific virus on my computer. They are real arrogant
about it too. They sent a clear message. The filenames of all the saved web
sites that are supporting this exposure of the South African government were
changed and only those. They changed the security settings on my data directory
containing the information on land reform and only that and then they accessed
windows and messed up the registry.Very specific message indeed.

üRemember
that the government has admitted to what they are doing see letter to Minister 3.pdf. In that letter I asked
them to confirm it and they did! As you know the legal position is that if you
refuse to answer a charge it is an admission. I said”

Is it your strategy
to obtain control of land at the cost of so many lives?

If that is your
strategy you need but confirm it by ignoring this correspondence and then sirs,
it shall be added to the heady heap of similar indictments that will be
published in the first world as an exposure of the wicked tyranny at foot at
your command.

üThey did not answer because it is
the truth. They then supplied more proof after saying I was raising up ghosts
when predicting land value collapse. See the link called PROOF.pdf below. The
cat is out the bag for good and they are getting desperate.

üOne cannot but agree with the
Club of Rome when they say that Africa is not ready to be entrusted with the
supply of the first world’s food. The pressure on aid will need to be
properly managed. As you can see, they are doing a good job of that. Are
they going to help the victims. I doubt it. The righteous victims of this world
are always cast aside because they are not politically correct. Politics. What
the ANC told Hendrik Cloete, the leader of Goodhouse has so much more impetus
now. They said. “If you do not vote for us you will starve”. How true.
This is dark savage Africa. Kept so by the politically right of the first
world.THE TIME HAS COME FOR THE PUBLIC
TO ENTRUST THEIR GENEROUS OFFERINGS OF AID TO ORGANISATIONS OUTSIDE THIS
VICIOUS POLITICAL CLIQUE. Organisations that will see to it that the real
victims are helped. Watch this space. We are putting together a huge
organisation made up of African churches for that prupose.

ØThursday, 30 June 2005. I was sent a fax requesting
information of the status quo in Goodhouse deposed to before a
commissioner of oaths by each farmer. I am told, in order to write the loans
off. Someone has seen the light. So did the First National Bank of South Africa
after I politely set out the situation to them. There are still some
responsible people in this world. We need to nurture them. Would they also put
pressure on the government? Or would they be wasting their time and tact on a
lost cause. Please send your demands for an answer on this issue to the
president at President@po.gov.zaand his ministers at SIHilzinger-Maas@dla.gov.za

üAfter I posted the last message,
the government immediately resorted to their old trick - harassment.This happens as regular as clock-work.See the following link for the sordid nature
of the latest -harrassment.pdf .

ü1.The Result – usual stonewalling
followed by a propaganda war (heavily laced with the usual secretly conducted
defamation campaign) all topped by grossly selective, bias and government
backing reporting in the media see Copied text of e-mail to media.pdf.

üAt least I am not alone. Dr.
Phillip Du Toit is also taking his fair share of persecution. See the following
link: - Free Book: The Great
South African Land Scandal - The book they tried to suppress!! . Wonder when South Africans
will ever stand together though. In the
mean time the good coloured community in Goodhouse is still hungry while
there is a project ready to deployseeGDP Web
Page\index.html- but it cannot if the government will no
transfer the land.Communist governments never transfer
land because they loose their power of political manipulation that way!

ØI am writing a précis to a book
on the topic called “Land Reform in
Southern Africa, The
Hidden Agendas, The Scams, The Moles, The Corruption, The Victims, The Future. A shocking exposure containing
intercepted documents, photographs, names, places dates, outcomes etc. by Dr.
Izak Labuschagne”. Keep watching this space for details.

Land Reform in
Southern Africa, The Hidden Agendas, The Scams, The Moles, The Corruption,
The Victims, The Future.

A shocking exposure covering over
400 pages containing intercepted documents, photographs, names, places, dates,
outcomes etc. This work is still incomplete, but already contains much of what
is needed to knowinformation for every farmer in South Africa.
The headings that still need to be completed are already there and therefore
one has a good idea of what is coming. This publication is hot news as the
issues are alive on several e-mail forums right now! These forums are disclosed
in the book. Anyone purchasing this book now will be entitled to updates at a
vastly discounted price.

Price R 520.00

ØTo see a copy of the latest in
the legal proceedingsregarding
Goodhouse that have been interfered with by the state see ðsupplaffid3.pdf . Anyone needing details of the
founding documents can send a e-mail to www.izak.co.za

ØTo see a copy of the Presentation
made to the parliamentary Committee on
land reform Click here ðParliament.htm

This project was
developed by Dr. Labuschagne in collaboration with Investors comprising
Directors of major Agricultural Co-operatives in South Africa, the Croation
trade Mission, Several Foreign Direct Investors, The Ubuntu Villiage Oil
Extraction facility in Pretoria, The IDC, several commercial banks, the SADC
development Fund trust and various other institutions and entities of lesser
importance. Dr. Labuschagne developed a web page for the project and it is
featured at http://www.izak.co.za/GDP%20Web%20Page/index.htmlThe project has been brought to a halt by the governments refusal to stop
interfering with the occupiers of the land. The government also refuses to
transfer the land notwithstanding the fact that they are compelled to do so by
several Acts of Parliament. Resort to the courts found the courts corrupted
(See Corrupt Legal Proceedings at Kimberley).

The following comprises an Investment risk
trigger regarding the Goodhouse Paprika project that was toppled by the South African
Government: -

Dr. Izak
Labuschagne is a Strategic Planner respected by many prominent organisations
and persons as having a vast experience in land reform issues and related
agricultural developments in South Africa. He is regularly invited toaddressed important conferences on the issue
and forms part of some significant initiatives in the field. Further details
can be seen on www.izak.co.za (see the
tabs marked “Contact Details, Profile, Strategic Planning, Land Reform and
Projects”).

The
situation can probably best be summarised by quoting from a recent letter
addressed to various prominent government officials by Dr. Labuschagne in which
he states it thus: -

The
international community are fast realising that apart from the fact that the
government of South Africa wants to expropriate most of the white owned land as
opposed to developing the land under the government’s control, they have no
intention of ever letting the beneficiaries of land reform ever control the
land as private sector entities, because the government is intent on developing
a centralistic and communist style management of the land.

A few
years ago that statement would have seemed hysterical and surreal. Developments
over the last two years however, are such that the statement now carries an
enormous amount of weight as it is supported by so many other prominent
organisations and entities on the continent. That support pales into
insignificance however, when one looks at the case studies that support that
disclosure.

The
latest in the long line of Private Public Participation Projects that have
failed in the land reform program of South Africa proves the point yet again as
indeed all these projects have now failed. This is the land bank acclaimed Paprika Project made up of the previously
private sector controlled Goodhouse Agricultural Corporation and Nocal (Pty)
Ltd companies in the far Northern Cape along some of the most fertile land in
the region against the orange river.

In that project the Government simply used the tools from their by now
well- known bag of tricks.

1.First they started off
by reneging on the securities that they induced the private sector and the Land
Bank of South Africa to rely and act upon. This was achieved by delaying their
performance in terms of the contracts exchanged and altering the memorandum in
an act of duress.

1.1.The Land Bank was
induced by the government into accepting a lease between the council and the
management company as security (until the land is transferred) whilst there
were still previously established leases in place. The previous leases were not
disclosed and so the security is worthless.

2.Next
up the government embarked on extremely hostile and aggressive discriminated
against all but their supporters who were participating in the project, to the
point where they drove all but their own supporters away, thus totally
de-stabilizing the project.

2.1.In this case the bag of
tricks included gross short payments to non government supporters, not
developing their land, making them do all the work and then not paying them
whilst overpaying their supporters most of whom spend most of their time being
drunk, complaining, attacking the management and destroying infrastructure and
crops and generally making a party of the destabilization process with
government funding. This was achieved by putting their supporters in charge of
wages, in this case a person well known by all the local lawyers as a
fraudster.

3.This crisis was then
used to intervene and launch a tactical take over of this private sector
controlled project.

4.That situation is then used
to justify not transferring the land to the management company and that of
course removes any chance of getting outside help from financiers as the land
security is still held by the state.

5.Next up will be labour
unrest for which they are well positioned having introduced two extremely
political non-agricultural unions to the project, one from the mining and
another from the production sector.

6.In the mean time some R
9 mil of financed project development capital had to be lent to the processing
factory so as to mitigate damages caused by delays in contractual performance
at the instance of the government.

7.The government used
that crisis it created to also take control of the factory and now they refuse
to repay the amount leaving the agricultural production company in a financial
crisis.

8.To top it off, it now
appears that the planning grants that emanated from the land reform grant
program exceeded the amount allocated to the project. In other words the
private sector initiators and some of the public officials who shared this
money ripped the guts out of the project before it even got under way. That
would explain why the Land Bank had to take a 90% exposure in the project.

Some R 2 bil in land reform projects failed
last year because the Land reform grants that were to be used in conjunction
with the Land Bank to get the projects going suddenly disappeared out of the
picture. One of the main reasons was that some white owned land was going to be
purchased for one of the projects. That was a no-no because government want to
ensure that no white land owner is ever properly compensated or compensated at
all for participating in the land reform program as invited by the government
to do.

The government instead want to expropriate
90% of all white owned land in three stages, the first 30% target being clearly
disclosed in their current election manifesto.

The poor beneficiaries of this
land of course do not realise that they will never be able to control the land
or do private sector controlled development on it.

Case
studies such as the above comprise almost 100% of Public Private Participation
(PPP) and Public sector projects in the South African Land Reform scenario. As
a result of this Dr. Labuschagne is obviously unable to promote any PPP in the
South African Land Reform program, as it clearly would entail dire risks for
any public sector investor, partner and financier. Moreover, the situation is
so deplorable that the triggering of this investment risk bulletin was
necessary.

Latest news is that the government refuses to come to arrangements with
regards to their water and electricity supply, with the result that in the case of this project some 19 families are left destitute.

Dr. Labuschagne is
appealing to all international Aid agencies to contact him so as to help
alleviate this humanitarian crisis. “We will repay whatever aid we get”, say
the farmers because they want to use the money to establish crops on their
lands. “These are some of the bravest and toughest farmers I have met as
they work in temperatures often exceeding 50 degrees centigrade” says Dr.
Labuschagne.

As a result of the potential and calibre of
people there many of the big players and financiers realise this and are
therefore positioned to provide finance to get a significant project on the go
on the land. Three other farmers outside the project have made land available.
Value adding in the way of pack-housing for exports is what is in the pipeline.
“Whoever wants to Joint Venture now with these farmers will make a handsome
profit because the land is some of the most fertile in the region with a
history of record crops”, says Dr. Labuschagne”.

The problem however, is that these plans are
taking the usual 6 to 12 months time to implement and in the mean time, these farmers want to work so that they
can eat and survive till then.

For those who prefer a formal
arrangement as opposed to a donation we are prepared to enter into an
acknowledgement of debt or a JV or whatever instrument they wish to employ.

Please contact Dr.
Labuschagne direct at the details given below or the writer in Washington at
the following contact details