Collecemall wrote: we don't see similar vegetation in similar climates around the world. Is there anywhere someone can lead me to address this simple yet damning point?

We do see similar vegetation in similar climates around the world.

Collecemall wrote:Be gone troll.

You were correct Collecemail. Similar climates around the world do not have the same vegetation. You are never wrong.

You have no interest in a conversation and you clearly want to interpret one sentence in the least charitable way possible while ignoring the previous points in the paragraph. It was clear enough that others understood the point. There's no point in addressing you given your history here.... so BE GONE TROLL.

"Every man is a creature of the age in which he lives, and few are able to raise themselves above the ideas of their time." “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” ~~Voltaire

Collecemall wrote:I've seen a ton of these "debates/exhibits" which address the typical reasons why the flood is impossible but I've never seen an apologetic concerning why plants are segregated by location as well. It seems the focus is always on animals which do have some locomotion but with plants this isn't possible. Yet we don't see similar vegetation in similar climates around the world. Is there anywhere someone can lead me to address this simple yet damning point?

You are right that I have never heard a proponent of evolution use this argument, but I was listening to a podcast (Archaeological Fantasies) in which they use a similar argument. They were making the point about how people believe in Ancient Aliens or Atlantis giving early humans all the basic knowledge, such as farming. Yet, when we look around the world, all the civilizations farmed different things. There is no reason why a mother culture would split things up like that. That is evidence that farming came about independently among all the ancient civilisations.