-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06 Jul 1999 19:55:35 +0200, lstep@mail.dotcom.fr wrote:
>Benchamrks have been done. They
>are on http://www.kyoto.wide.ad.jp/mta/eval1/
>It compares bulk_mailer-1.11 with sendmail-8.9.3, exim-2.053
>postfix beta-19990122-pl01, qmail-1.03, sendmail-8.9.3, Smail-3.2.0.101,
>SMTPfeed-0.95 with sendmail-8.9.3+3.2W, zmailer-2.99.50s11
>The only problem is that it's all in Japanese :-) You can
>anyway see the images, and it seems Postfix behaves better the the others.
I fail to see how the images alone can give you that when the methodolgy
behind the images isn't described nor what the individual plots on the graphs
mean, specifically. For the most part, Exim/Postfix seem comparable to me.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBN4JWXnpf7K2LbpnFEQJI/gCfYiKAQ31nEutbNNnIm5vPwf58Py8An32G
gkf2GN9tSgBckwladhZiSQwk
=zLzl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----