Just because I like being a downer: isn't using the ubuntu/debian/slackware logos a bit naughty? Unless permission is sought? I say this because technically they are registered marks I think._________________ASUS A1000, 800Mhz PIII Coppermine!, 192Mb RAM, 10Gb IBM Travelstar HDD, Build date August 2001.

The S on the sPup logo is generic.
Also, Slackware logo uses black S letter with white glow.
sPup use white blurred S.
Maybe the I have to delete the line below.
Besides those logos use only parts of registered logos, not whole.
BTW, here's another dPup and uPup logos (alternatives).

Puppy 4.4 "Woofy" will be going into alpha shortly
and you are 'on a roll' - any logos?

I think Puppy 4.4 will be an official standard Puppy (so will be Ppup?), and we already have an official Puppy logo, why don't we use it?
Maybe different color for different release?
I think the Pupplets that really needs logos, because they can't use the exact same logo as the official standard version (but can use variation of it - I think -- I'm not a lawyer, I don't know the legal aspect of trademarks).

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou cannot attach files in this forumYou can download files in this forum