Tessai217

Radscoolian

ramyb wrote:On the gray, I felt it looked sloppy and gross, but now these nachos somehow look extremely delicious- I especially like how the jalapeños look on the kelly- great improvement Good luck

Thanks ramy! Sometimes I fail to remember that I am making shirt designs.
I had wanted it to look all sloppy and gross with grease stains and such 'cause I thought it was funny. But really, who wants to wear a shirt with fake grease stains? (besides reprobates like myself, that is).

kllangellier

I really think you should change the thumbnail, make it include either Yoda or uh, R2D2(?) because I have skipped right over this entry like, 5 or 6 times. I finally was like "Meh, I might as well take a look" and then BAM Instant Vote. Had I realized it was Star Wars the first time around, I'd have clicked and voted immediately (because it's good/funny, not JUST for the ref). I'm just afraid you might lose out on votes. :-/

pyromike25

kevlar51

jboshaw wrote:this shirt is great (and i would actually buy it!), but doesn't it count as a text only design?

Thanks for liking it

At it's heart, the graphical element is the design itself. Typically the "no text only" rule is meant to keep you from having a shirt where the only thing on the shirt is a joke, which isn't really the case here since the text is there for the context, not so much their meaning.

These kind of shirts have also survived "no non-incidental text" derbies, which is a stricter standard.

Anyway, I really think the design as a whole satisfies the requirement, and I really hope the rejectionator agrees

ramyb

At it's heart, the graphical element is the design itself. Typically the "no text only" rule is meant to keep you from having a shirt where the only thing on the shirt is a joke, which isn't really the case here since the text is there for the context, not so much their meaning.

These kind of shirts have also survived "no non-incidental text" derbies, which is a stricter standard.

Anyway, I really think the design as a whole satisfies the requirement, and I really hope the rejectionator agrees

I am pretty sure this one will get through- this design comes to mind, which made it through a no text-only derby (as did my own Schrodinger's equation shirt in the same derby). The only reason I could think of that this might be different is that the number 2 itself might still be considered text, while the other two made a shape that wasn't just text, but I think this should still fall under the same principle of small parts making a greater whole. I'm pretty sure the no text-only rule is more like no slogan-only. Good luck

ramyb

Oh no :/ If you have time to redraw the idea, you could try drawing him from the back with the map upside down, and maybe lose some of the clothing details- I'd get rid of the name in the top left too to be safe. Real bummer, it's a really funny shirt

fistsofham

midgerock wrote:Hey gang! I hope people like the design and here's a link to a larger jpeg of the design for details.

On the topic of pugs, [sidebar] I have always wanted one. If I were to have one I would name him Niegel and he would have a British accent.
And he would wear a smoking jacket and blue ascot, because blues my favorite color and
a smoking jacket... because a pug in a smoking jacket would be cute and funny.
Please excuse my ramblings...

There's no such thing as having only one pug. Once you get one, they multiply in the dead of night. Then the next morning, you have two or three.

Woot.com is operated by Woot Services LLC.
Products on Woot.com are sold by Woot, Inc., other than items on Wine.Woot which are sold by the seller specified on the product detail page.
Product narratives are for entertainment purposes and frequently employ
literary point of view;
the narratives do not express Woot's editorial opinion.
Aside from literary abuse, your use of this site also subjects you to Woot's
terms of use
and
privacy policy.
Woot may designate a user comment as a Quality Post, but that doesn't mean we agree with or guarantee anything said or linked to in that post.