Ld. Craven & al Petition referred to Judges.

Upon reading the Petition of William Lord Craven,
Jane Upton Widow, as Guardian, and on the Behalf, of
John Davis Upton her Son, an Infant, and the several
Churchwardens and Overseers of the Poor of the several Parishes of St. Clement's Danes, St. Martin in the
Fields, St. James's Westminster, and St. Paul Covent Garden; praying Leave to bring in a Bill, for vesting a
Field, or Parcel of Ground, with the Appurtenances, in
the said Parish of St. Martin in the Fields, in the County
of Middlesex, commonly called The Pesthouse Field, in
the said Lord Craven; and for settling certain Premises
in Paddington, contracted for, to be marked out, to be enclosed, for building a Pest-house and other Conveniencies,
for the Charitable Purposes the said Pest-house Field was
settled:

It is Ordered, That the Consideration of the said
Petition be, and is hereby, referred to the Lord Chief
Baron of the Court of Exchequer and Mr. Justice Denton; with the usual Directions, according to the Standing Orders.

Sankey against Graham.

A Petition of Joseph Tily, Agent for Margaret Sankey
Widow, was read; praying, "In regard the said Margaret Sankey has in her Custody, in Ireland, the Deeds
under which she derives her Title, and is coming over
from thence; that the hearing her Appeal, which
stands appointed for this Day Sevennight, may be
adjourned for Three Weeks."

And thereupon the Petitioner and the Respondent's
Agent being called in, and heard at the Bar; and withdrawn:

Ordered, That the said Hearing be adjourned to
Tuesday the 5th Day of March next.

Wollesthorpe Common Enclosure, Bill:

Hodie 3avice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act
for confirming the Enclosure, Division, and Exchanges, of several Lands and Grounds, lying in the
Common Fields of Wollesthorpe, near Belvorr Castle, in
the County of Lincoln."

The Question was put, "Whether this Bill shall
pass?"

It was Resolved in the Affirmative.

Message to H. C. with it.

A Message was sent to the House of Commons,
by Mr. Thomas Bennet and Mr. Edwards:

To carry down the said Bill, and desire their Concurrence thereto.

Seawen & al. Petition referred to Judges.

Upon reading the Petition of Thomas Scawen, Louis
Scawen, Robert Scawen, and William Scawen, Esquires,
Hugh Lord Viscount Falmouth, Sir William Hammond,
John Rudge Esquire, and Elizabeth Stafford; praying
Leave to bring in a Bill, for Sale of an Estate in Ireland, settled by the late Sir William Scawen; and for settling another Estate, in the County of Surrey, in Lieu
thereof:

It is Ordered, That the Consideration of the said
Petition be, and is hereby, referred to Mr. Justice Probyn and Mr. Justice Reeves; with the usual Directions,
according to the Standing Orders.

Rowley against M'Lorinan.

The House being informed, "That Mr. Richard
Brereton attended, with certain Pleadings and Proceedings, in the Cause wherein William Rowley and
Arabella his Wife are Appellants, and Hugh M'Lorinan and others Respondents:"

Pleadings proved.

He was called in; and delivered, at the Bar, the said
Pleadings and Proceedings; and attested upon Oath,
That the same were true Copies, he having examined
them with the Originals in the proper Offices in Ireland."

And then he was directed to withdraw.

Boone & Ux. Leave for a Bill:

After reading, and considering, the Report of the
Judges to whom the Petition of Charles Boone Esquire
and Mary his Wife was referred; praying Leave to
bring in a Bill, for the Purposes therein mentioned:

It is Ordered, That Leave be given to bring in a
Bill, pursuant to the said Petition and Report.

Bill read.

Hodie 1avice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act for
vesting certain Houses in Blechingly, in the County of
Surrey, late the Estate of George Evelyn Esquire, deceased, in Charles Boone Esquire; and for settling
another Estate, of greater Value, on the Daughters
and Coheirs of the said George Evelyn, in Lieu of,
and Exchange for, the same."

Butner, &c. Nat. Bill:

Du Carel & al. Petition to be added to it.

Upon reading the Petition of Andrew Coltee du Carel,
James Coltee du Carel, Isaac Correjolles, John Adolph Schroder, Peter Dupont, Henry Riesenbeck, and Jacob Reinhold;
praying, "That their Names may be added to the said
Bill:"

It is Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table, till the said Bill be read a Second Time.

Sir R. Austen & al. against Sir J. Leigh:

After hearing Counsel, upon the Petition and Appeal
of Sir Robert Austen Baronet and Peter Burrell Esquire,
(Executors and Trustees of Sir Samuel Lennard Baronet,
deceased) Mary Johnson, Samuel Lennard, and Thomas
Lennard, Infants, by the said Mary Johnson, their Guardian; complaining of an Order made by the late Lord
Chancellor, the 16th of April last, affirming a Decree of
the Master of the Rolls, the 28th of February 1731,
made in a Cause wherein Sir John Leigh Knight was
Plaintiff, and the Appellants were Defendants; and
praying, "That the same may be reversed:" As also
upon the Answer of the said Sir John Leigh put in to
the said Appeal; and due Consideration had of what
was offered on either Side in this Cause:

Decree and Order affirmed.

It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the
said Petition and Appeal be, and is hereby, dismissed
this House; and that the said Order made by the late
Lord Chancellor, affirming the said Decree, be, and is
hereby, affirmed.

Du Carel & al. sworn, in order to be naturalized.

Anderson against Anderson.

A Petition of Alexander Hamilton Gentleman, Agent
for Thomas Anderson, Father and Son, was presented,
and read; setting forth, "That the Appellants were,
last Session of Parliament, admitted to prosecute their
Appeal in Forma Pauperis; and that Mr. Rider (now
His Majesty's Solicitor General) and Mr. Home Campbell were assigned Counsel for them;" and praying,
In regard the said Mr. Campbell is not yet come from
Scotland, that the Hearing of the Petitioner's Appeal
may be put off to some Day in the next Month."

And thereupon the Petitioner, and Mr. Ross the Respondent's Agent, being called in, and heard at the Bar;
and withdrawn:

It is Ordered, That the said Hearing be put off
to Thursday the 7th Day of March next.

Sneyd & al. Petition referred to Judges.

Upon reading the Petition of Anne Sneyd, Widow of
Ralph Sneyd, late of Keele, in the County of Stafford,
Esquire, deceased, who was Eldest Son and Heir of
Ralph Sneyd, late of Keele aforesaid, Esquire, by Frances
his Wife, now Dame Frances Chester; and of Edward
Sneyd, of Anington, in the said County of Stofford, Esquire,
Brother of the said Ralph Sneyd the Son, for themselves,
and on the Behalf of Dreyden, Ralph, Edward, William,
Honour, and Anne Sneyd, Infants, Children of the said
Ralph Sneyd the Son, by the said Anne Sneyd; praying
Leave to bring in a Bill, for charging a competent Part
of certain Estates, in the Counties of Stafford and Chester,
in the Petition mentioned, with Provisions for the Daughters and Younger Sons of Ralph Sneyd, Father of the
said Ralph Sneyd:

It is Ordered, That the Consideration of the said
Petition be, and is hereby, referred to Mr. Justice Denton and Mr. Baron Comyns; with the usual Directions,
according to the Standing Orders.

Against depriving Others in the Army of then Commissions, Bill.

The Duke of Marlborough presented to the House a
Bill, intituled, "An Act for the better securing the
Constitution, by preventing the Officers of such Land
Forces as shall at any Time be allowed by Authority of Parliament from being deprived of their Commissions, otherwise than by Judgement of a Court
Martial to be held for that Purpose, or by Address
of either House of Parliament."

And the same was read.

Moved, "To order, That the said Bill be read a 2d
Time on Tuesday next."

Which being objected to:

And it being also moved, "To reject the Bill:"

After Debate;

The Question was put, upon the First Motion.

And it was Resolved in the Negative.

Protest against not reading it Second Time.

"Dissentient.

"1st, Because the Exigence of Affairs in Times past,
or Complaisance of former Parliaments, have, for several Years occasioned the keeping up a considerable
Body of Land Forces in this Kingdom: And as various
Events may happen, to oblige future Parliaments to
pursue the same Measures, which nothing but the
utmost Necessity can justify, they being repugnant to
the Nature of our Constitution, and dangerous to the
Liberties of a free People; and as the whole Disposition of the said Forces is absolutely in the Crown;
we cannot but think it highly reasonable that, when
so great an Increase of Power and Influence, which
was formerly occasional and rare, comes to be annually vested and constantly exercised by the Crown;
that some such Limitations as proposed by this Bill
are not only proper, but necessary: And we are confirmed in that Opinion, by the Doctrine so often and
so strongly laid down in this House, that the greatest
Danger to this Nation, from a Standing Military
Force, must arise from the Abuse of the Power which
now subsists, of cashiering Officers without any Crime
proved or alledged, and of garbling the Army at Pleasure; and we heartily wish that nothing had since happened, to put us in Mind of that Doctrine.

"2dly, Because the employing or removing of all
General Officers would have been left in the Crown,
if this Bill had passed into a Law; for the Enacting
Clauses were only to this Purpose, "That no Colonel,
or other Officer of inferior Degree, having his Commission from the Crown, shall be cashiered, or removed
(other than to an higher Post), or discharged from his
Commission, or be deprived of the Pay belonging to
the same, in any other Manner than by a Court Martial, to be appointed by a Commission under His Majesty's Sign Manual, to any Officer not under the Degree of a Field Officer:" At the same Time there is
a Provision in the Bill, "That nothing shall extend to
prevent His Majesty, or His Successors, from disban
ding, breaking, or reducing, all or any of the Regiments, Troops, or Companies, now in being, or which
shall or may be raised hereafter:" And it is further
Provided, "That His Majesty and His Successors may
remove any Officer, upon an Address of either House
of Parliament." We conceive, therefore, that as those
Posts would still have remained, upon all Vacancies, in
the sole Disposal of His Majesty; and that the Persons
now possessing them are liable to be removed, for any
Breach or Neglect of their Duty, by a Court Martial,
or by Address of either House of Parliament; the
Prerogative of the Crown would no otherwise be
abridged or altered than it has been on many other
Occasions, particularly in that Instance of making the
Judges to hold their Places quamdiu se bene gesscrint,
which were formerly during Pleasure only; which
Alteration has been always approved, and, we hope,
will, in no Time to come, ever be attempted to be repealed.

"3dly, Because the Practice of all the Nations in
Europe, even where the Government is most arbitrary, justifies the Intention of this Bill; for no Instance can be produced in any other Kingdom or
State (as we believe), where Officers are cashiered or
deprived of their Commissions, otherwise than by the
Judgement of a Court Martial. How much stronger
Reason then have we of this Nation to establish such
a Rule, since our Officers are, many of them, in a
Capacity of having a Share in the Legislature; where
it is absolutely necessary for the Preservation of the
Constitution, that every Member should be free and
independent; and more particularly at this Time,
when we find the Number of Officers having Seats
in Parliament far greater than ever it was even in
Time of War, when above Three Times the Number
of the present Troops were kept on Foot.

"4thly, Although it was objected in the Debate, "That,
in Time of Danger, upon Suspicion of traiterous
Practices, it might be necessary to remove an Officer
from his Post, though the Informations might not be
ready to be produced, or proper to be laid before a
Court Martial; and yet, by such Officer's continuing
in his Post, great Mischief might accrue to His Majesty and the Public;" we apprehend that Objection
received a full Answer, "That, in such a Case, an Officer might be immediately put under Arrest, or sent
to some other Post where he could not be dangerous;" and, we conceive, such a Method of Proceeding
will always be thought most proper, where the Crime
is only suspected, but not capable of legal Proof; for
it must be allowed as unjust to condemn a Man upon
Suspicion only, as it would be unreasonable to let a
Man continue in Power who is justly under Suspicion.
That Part of the Prerogative which will be always
esteemed the brightest Jewel of the Crown, the
Power of conferring Grace and Favour, would have
remained entire, had this Bill passed into a Law;
and only the disagreeable Part, of inflicting Punishments, was designed to be limited, or rather secured
by this Bill from being turned to any ill Use, by the
private Whispers of some malicious or vindictive Minister, who may at any Time hereafter unhappily get
Possession of the Royal Ear.

"5thly, Because, the Time for the new Elections
drawing near, we look upon this as the most favourable Opportunity of passing so necessary a Bill; since
hereafter the very great Increase, which may probably happen, of the Number of Officers in Parliament,
may render the future passing of such Bill totally impracticable; for, while the Officers of the Army remain in their present precarious Situation, they may
be intimidated, by the Threats of an unforgiving Minister, from young even for a Bill of this Nature, and
choose to purchase present Security, at the Price of
their own Interests, and their future Independence in
Parliament, in which the Liberties of their Country
are so much concerned.

"6thly, Because we conceive the small Degree of
Independence, proposed to be given to the Officers of
the Army by this Bill, to be necessary, to prevent
their being exposed to Temptations; in which (though
we are ready to do Justice to the Sentiments of Honour and Virtue in those Gentlemen) we should rather lament, than wonder to find a discouraged and
indigent Virtue yield to a criminal, but prosperous,
Compliance; especially should we have the Misfortune to see an imperious, all-grasping, Power-engrossing Minister, who may make their political Submission to his oppressive and destructive Schemes the
only Test of their Merit, and the only Tenure of
their Commissions.

Then the Question was put, "Whether the aforementioned Bill shall be rejected?"

It was Resolved in the Affirmative.

Motion for an Address, to know who advised his Majesty to dismiss the D of Bolton and Ld. Cobham:

Moved, "That an humble Address be presented to
His Majesty, to desire that He will be graciously
pleased to acquaint this House, who advised His Majesty to remove the Duke of Bolton and the Lord Viscount Cobham from their respective Regiments; and
what Crimes were laid to their Charge."

The same was likewise objected to.

After further Debate;

The Question was put thereupon.

And it was Resolved in the Negative.

"Dissentient.

Protest again not presentum such an Address.

"1st, Because we conceive that it is the inherent Right
of this House, to address the Crown, to be informed
who are the Advisers of any Measures that may be
prejudicial to His Majesty's Government, or dangerous to the Liberties of the Nation.

"2dly, Because the Removal of Two Officers of
such Rank and Dignity, and of such known Fidelity
to His Majesty's Person and Government, without any
Cause assigned, or any known or alleged Neglect of
their Duty, gave the greatest Alarm to many of His
Majesty's most faithful Subjects: We therefore thought
it for His Majesty Service, to give Him this Occasion
to publish to the World the just Grounds of His
Displeasure; or to detect the Calumny of their Accusers, and consequently to withdraw His Confidence
from such pernicious Counsellors.

"3dly, Because that, as the Practice of displacing
Officers has grown more frequent in Proportion to
the Increase of their Number in both Houses of Parliament, the World may entertain (however unjustly)
an Opinion, that the free Use of their Votes has been
the real Cause of their Disgrace; and the more so,
since most of the Persons who have been removed
have happened to be Members of One or other House
of Parliament.

"4thly, Because Applications of this Nature to the
Crown may hereafter protect many of His Majesty's
faithful Subjects from the secret and malicious Representations of some Minister in future Times, who,
though unrestrained by any Sense of Truth, regardless of his Prince's real Interest, and animated only
by his own Passions, may however be checked by the
just Apprehensions, that the Applications of Parliament may lay open his Calumnies, and bring upon
himself the Disgrace he had prepared for others.

"Because we are not conscious that any Neglect or
Breach of our Duty can be laid to our Charge; much
less any Want of Zeal and Attachment for His Majesty's Person and Government. We therefore must
testify our earnest Desire that this Motion had passed
in the Affirmative; that we might have had an Opportunity given us of knowing our supposed Crimes
and Accusers, and, we hope, of justifiing ourselves
to His Majesty and the World.

"Bolton.
Cobham."

Representation of the Board of Trade, concerning the American Colonies.

Whereas To-morrow is appointed, for the House to
be put into a Committee, to take into Consideration the
Representation of the Commissioners for Trade and
Plantations, prepared in Pursuance of an Address to
His Majesty of the 13th of June last, for an Account
of Laws made, Manufactures set up, and Trade carried
on, in any of His Majesty's Plantations in America, which
may have affected the Trade, Navigation, and Manufactures, of this Kingdom:

It is Ordered, That the House be put into a Committee, to take the said Representation into Consideration, To-morrow Sevennight.

Malt Bill.

A Message was brought from the House of Commons,
by Sir Charles Turner and others:

With a Bill, intituled, "An Act for continuing the
Duties upon Malt, Mum, Cyder, and Perry, in that
Part of Great Britain called England; and for granting to His Majesty certain Duties upon Malt, Mum,
Cyder, and Perry, in that Part of Great Britain called
Scotland, for the Service of the Year One Thousand
Seven Hundred and Thirty-four; and for making
forth Duplicates of Exchequer Bills, Lottery Tickets,
and Orders, lost, burnt, or otherwise destroyed;" to
which they desire the Concurrence of this House.

The said Bill was read the First Time.

Rowley against McLorman:

Upon reading the Petition of William Rowley Esquire
and Arabella his Wife; praying, "In regard there are
some few Mistakes in the reciting the Pleadings mentioned in the Petitioners Appeal, that they may be at
Liberty to amend the said Appeal, as they shall be
advised:"

Appeal to be amended.

It is Ordered, That the Petitioners may amend
their said Appeal, as desired; they amending the Respondent's Copy.

Service of Order on the Clerk in Court of the Respondents to the Appeal of the City of London, to be good.

A Petition of the Mayor, Commonalty, and Citizens
of London, by Charles Stracy, their Solicitor and Agent,
was presented, and read; setting forth, "That the said
Agent has served the Order of this House on Two of
the Respondents to the Petitioners Appeal; but finds
it impossible to serve any other of them, they being
all Masters of Ships, so as to bring this Cause to a
Hearing this Session;" and praying, "That the Service
of the said Order upon Mr. John Thompson, the Respondents Clerk in Court, be deemed good Service."

And thereupon the said Charles Stracey was called in;
and examined, upon Oath, at the Bar, as to the Allegations of the said Petition.

And being withdrawn:

It is Ordered, That the Service of the said Order,
for answering, on the said Clerk in Court, be deemed
good Service.

Jackson against Francia.

The House being moved, "That a Day may be appointed, for hearing the Cause wherein Cuthbert Jackson is Appellant, and Moses Francia Respondent:"

It is Ordered, That this House will hear the said
Cause, by Counsel, at the Bar, on the First vacant Day
for Causes after those already appointed.

Philpott against Moor.

The like Motion and Order, for hearing the Cause
wherein Charles Philpott Gentleman is Appellant, and
Humphry Moor Respondent, on the next vacant Day for
Causes.

Count. Kildare, &c. against Hopson.

The like Motion and Order, for hearing the Cause
wherein Elizabeth Countess Dowager of Kildare and
Lady Catherine Jones are Appellants, and Richard Hopson Esquire is Respondent, on the next vacant Day for
Causes.

Collins's Petition, Committee revived.

Ordered, That the Committee appointed to consider of the Petition of Arthur Collins Esquire, praying
Leave to publish a printed Book relating to Baronies
by Writ, notwithstanding there are some few Extracts
out of the Journals of this House, be revived; and meet
on Tuesday next.

Boone's Bill.

Hodie 2avice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act
for vesting certain Houses in Blechingly, in the County
of Surrey, late the Estate of George Evelyn Esquire,
deceased, in Charles Boone Esquire; and for settling
another Estate, of greater Value, on the Daughters
and Coheirs of the said George Evelyn, in Lieu of, and
Exchange for, the same."

Ordered, That the said Bill be committed to the
Consideration of the Lords following; (videlicet,)

Their Lordships, or any Five of them; to meet
on Monday the 4th Day of March next, at Ten
a Clock in the Forenoon, in the Prince's Lodgings near the House of Peers; and to adjourn as
they please.

Ross to enter into Recognizance for Hoggan.

The House being moved, "That Mr. Alexander
Ross may be permitted to enter into a Recognizance
for John Hoggan and others, on account of their Appeal depending in this House; they residing in Scotland:"

It is Ordered, That the said Alexander Ross may
enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellants, as
desired.

Darney for Jevers.

The like Motion and Order, for James Darney Gentleman to enter into a Recognizance for Henry Jevers
Esquire; for a Reason of the like Nature.

Dundas & al. against Sharp & al.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of George
Dundas of Dundas, John Stewart of Binnie, George Dallas of Parkley, Alexander Johnston of Stratton, John
Hamilton of Grainge, John Ker of Todshaugh, and James
Dundas of Castlecaric, Esquires; complaining of some
Parts of Two Interlocutors of the Lords of Session in
Scotland, of the 21st of December and 3d of January
last; and of Two Interlocutors of the said Lords, of the
1st of this Instant February, made on the Behalf of
Thomas Sharp of Houstoun, Alexander Hamilton of Innerweek, James Glen of Longcroft, and Andrew Majoribanks of Majoribanks, Esquires; and praying, "That
the same may be reversed:"

It is Ordered, That the said Thomas Sharp, Alexander Hamilton, James Glen, and Andrew Majoribanks,
may have a Copy of the said Appeal; and they are
hereby required to put in their Answer or respective
Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before Friday
the 15th Day of March next; and that Service of this
Order upon the said Respondents Agent at Edinburgh
be deemed good Service.

Buttner, &c. Nat. Bill.

Ordered, That the said Bill be committed to the
Consideration of the Lords Committees aforenamed:

Their Lordships, or any Five of them; to meet on
Tuesday the 19th Instant, at Ten of the Clock in
the Forenoon, in the Prince's Lodgings near the
House of Peers; and to adjourn as they please:

And that the Petition of Andrew Coltee du Carel, Samuel Coltee du Carel, Isaac Correjolles, John Adolph Schroder, Peter Dupont, Henry Riesenbeck, and Jacob Reinhold,
praying to be added to the said Bill, be referred to the
same Committee.

To oblige the cutting of Hedges near Highways, Bill.

A Message was brought from the House of Commons,
by Mr. Gybbon and others:

With a Bill, intituled, "An Act to explain and make
more effectual the Laws in being, to oblige the Possessors of Lands, adjacent to Common Highways, to
cut and keep low such Hedges as are adjoining to
the said Highways;" to which they desire the Concurrence of this House.

The said Bill was read the First Time.

Standing Order, to prevent Disorders in this House, Committee to consider of.

Ordered, That it be referred to the Lords Committees this Day aforenamed, to consider the Standing
Order of this House, of the 19th of December 1720, for
preventing the great Disorders that have been in this
House, especially when His Majesty is present; and report what they shall think proper thereupon:

Their Lordships, or any Five of them; to meet on
Tuesday next, at the usual Place; and to adjourn
as they please.

Address for a State of the National Debt.

Moved, "That an humble Address be presented to
His Majesty, That He will be graciously pleased to
order the proper Officer to lay before this House, a
State of the National Debt, provided or unprovided
for by Parliament, as it stood on the 31st of December 1732, and 31st of December 1733; together with
an Accompt of the Produce of the Sinking Fund in
that Year; and to the Payment of what Debts, contracted before the 25th of December 1716, the said
Fund hath been applied."

Ordered accordingly; and that the same be presented by the Lords with White Staves.

Ld. Abergavenny's Privilege:

Complaint being made to the House, and Oath made
at the Bar, "That John Bridger did, within the Time
of Privilege of Parliament, cut, or cause to be cut,
a great Number of Timber Trees and Tellers, belonging to the Lord Abergavenny, in the Parish of
Rotherfield, in the County of Sussex, in Breach of the
Privilege of this House:"

Bridger to be attached, for cutting Timber in Sussex.

It is Ordered, That the Serjeant at Arms attending
this House, his Deputy or Deputies, do forthwith attach the Body of the said John Bridger, and bring him
to the Bar of this House, to answer the Matter of the
said Complaint; and this shall be a sufficient Warrant
in that Behalf.

To Francis Jephson Esquire, Serjeant
at Arms attending this House, his
Deputy or Deputies, and every of
them.

Scawen, Leave for a Bill:

After reading, and considering, the Report of the
Judges to whom was referred the Petition of Thomas
Scawen Esquire and others; praying Leave to bring in
a Bill, for the Purposes therein mentioned:

It is Ordered, That Leave be given to bring in a
Bill, pursuant to the said Petition and Report.

Bill read.

Hodie 1avice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act
for enabling Thomas Scawen Esquire, and others, to
sell an Estate in Ireland, settled by Sir William
Scawen's Will; and settling another Estate (purchased
by the said Thomas Scawen) in England, of like Value,
to the same Uses."

Matters relating to the Election of Peers in Scotland, to be considered.

Ordered, That this House will, To-morrow Sevennight, take into Consideration Matters relating to
the Election of the Peers of that Part of Great Britain
called Scotland; and the Lords to be summoned.

Malt Bill:

Hodie 2avice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act
for continuing the Duties upon Malt, Mum, Cyder,
and Perry, in that Part of Great Britain called England; and for granting to His Majesty certain Duties
upon Malt, Mum, Cyder, and Perry, in that Part
of Great Britain called Scotland, for the Service of
the Year One Thousand Seven Hundred and Thirtyfour; and for making forth Duplicates of Exchequer
Bills, Lottery Tickets, and Orders, lost, burnt, or
otherwise destroyed."

Ordered, That the said Bill be committed to a
Committee of the whole House, To-morrow.

For cutting Hedges near Highways, Bill.

Hodie 2avice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act
to explain and make more effectual the Laws in
being, to oblige the Possessors of Lands, adjacent to
Common Highways, to cut and keep low such Hedges
as are adjoining to the said Highways.

Ordered, That the said Bill be committed to a
Committee of the whole House, on Thursday next.

Trotter to amend his Appeal.

Upon reading the Petition of Henry Trotter Esquire;
setting forth, "That, in the Petitioner's Appeal lately
presented to this House, to which the Earl of Marchmont and Mr. Hogg are Respondents, there are some
Interlocutors omitted to be mentioned;" and therefore
praying, "That he may have Leave to amend his said
Appeal, by inserting the Dates of such Interlocutors
as are omitted, he amending the Respondents Copy;
they not having yet put in any Answer:"

It is Ordered, That the Petitioner be at Liberty to
amend his said Appeal, according to the Prayer of the
said Petition; and that the Time for the said Respondents to put in their Answer or respective Answers to
the said Appeal be enlarged, for a Month from this
Time.

Buttner, &c. Nat. Bill.

The Earl of Strafford reported from the Lords Committees to whom the Bill, intituled, "An Act to naturalize John Matthew Buttner and John Lewis Kraguelius," was committed: "That they had examined
the Allegations of the Bill, which they found to be
true; and had considered the Petition of Andrew Coltec du Carel and others, to them referred; and had
gone through the Bill, and made some Amendments
thereunto."

And the same, being read Twice by the Clerk, were
agreed to by the House.

Sir T. Moncrief against T. Moncrief.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Sir Thomas
Moncrief Baronet; complaining of several Interlocutors
of the Lords of Session in Scotland, of the 17th, 25th,
29th, and 31st Days of January last, and the 6th and
19th Days of this Instant February, made on the Behalf
of Thomas Moncrief Esquire, his Eldest Son; and praying,
That the same may be reversed; and that the Appellant may have such Relief in the Premises as this
House shall think just:"

It is Ordered, That the said Thomas Moncrief may
have a Copy of the said Appeal; and he is hereby required to put in his Answer thereunto, in Writing, on
or before Tuesday the 19th Day of March next; and
that Service of this Order on the Agent or Procurator
of the said Respondent, in the Court of Session in Scotland, be deemed good Service.

Murray against Charteris.

The Answer of Francis Charteris of Ampsfield Esquire
and his Guardians, to the Appeal of Archibald Murray
Advocate, and others, was brought in.

Scawen's Bill.

Hodie 2avice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act
for enabling Thomas Scawen Esquire and others to
sell an Estate in Ireland, settled by Sir William Scawen's Will; and settling another Estate (purchased by
the said Thomas Scawen) in England, of like Value,
to the same Uses."

Ordered, That the said Bill be committed to the
Consideration of the Lords following; (videlicet,)

Their Lordships, or any Five of them; to meet on
Thursday the 7th Day of March next, at Ten
of the Clock in the Forenoon, in the Prince's
Lodgings near the House of Peers; and to adjourn as they please.

Papers relating to the Navy and Admiralty delivered.

The House being informed, "That some of the Commissioners of the Navy attended:"

They were called in; and delivered, at the Bar, pursuant to their Lordships Address to His Majesty of the
22d of January last,

"An Accompt of the Debt of the Navy, as it stood
the 31st December 1720."

And, "An Accompt as it stood the 31st of December
1733."

"An Accompt of what Sums of Money have been
given towards the Payment of the Debt of the Navy,
from Christmas 1720, to Christmas 1733."

"An Accompt of the Number of Seamen employed
in the Service of the Royal Navy, from the 31st December 1720, to the 31st December 1733."

"An Account of the Condition of the Fleet, the 31st
December 1721, and the 31st December 1733."

"A List of Surgeons and Masters on Half Pay, the
22d of January last."

"A List of Masters made, from the Year 1720, to
this Time."

"An Account of Masters and Surgeons that have desired Leave to quit the Service, from the Year 1720,
to this Time."

"An Accompt of old Naval Stores sold, from the 31st
December 1720, to the 31st December 1733; shewing
how the same has been applied, and by what Authority."

And then he acquainted the House, "That the other
Account required, being of the Quantity of Stores
from the Monthly Returns of the several Species as
it stood at Christmas in several Years, was a Work
which required Time to complete; but the same was
preparing with all possible Expedition, and would be
ready in a short Time to be laid before their Lordships."

And then he was directed to withdraw.

And the Titles of the said Accompts and Lists were
read.

Ordered, That the same do lie on the Table, for
the Perusal of the Lords.

The House being informed, "That a Person from
the Admiralty-office attended:"

He was called in; and delivered, at the Bar, pursuant to the asorementioned Address to His Majesty,

"A List of Captains, Masters and Commanders,
and Lieutenants, of His Majesty's Ships of War, made
from June 1720; with the Times when they were appointed, by whom made, and where."

"A List of the Sea Officers upon Half Pay; with
an Accompt of what the same amounted to for Three
Years last past, distinguishing each Year."

"An Account of such Officers as have desired Leave
to quit the Service after they were appointed to their
respective Ships; setting forth the Time each Officer
served on board the Ship he quitted, and where he
quitted, from the Year 1720, to the 22d January
1733."

And then he was directed to withdraw.

And the Titles of the said Lists and Account were
read.

Ordered, That the same do lie on the Table, for
the Perusal of the Lords.

Malt Bill.

The House (according to Order) was adjourned during Pleasure, and put into a Committee upon the Bill,
intituled, "An Act for continuing the Duties upon
Malt, Mum, Cyder, and Perry, in that Part of Great
Britain called England; and for granting to His Majesty certain Duties upon Malt, Mum, Cyder, and
Perry, in that Part of Great Britain called Scotland,
for the Service of the Year One Thousand Seven
Hundred and Thirty-four; and for making forth Duplicates of Exchequer Bills, Lottery Tickets, and
Orders, lost, burnt, or otherwise destroyed."

And, after some Time spent therein, the House was
resumed.

And the Earl of Cholmondely reported, "That the
Committee had gone through the Bill, and directed
him to report the same to the House, without any
Amendment."

Collins, Leave to publish a Book relating to Baronies by Writ.

The Earl of Strafford reported from the Lords Committees appointed to consider the Petition of Arthur Collins Esquire; praying Leave to publish a printed Book,
relating to Baronies by Writ, notwithstanding there
are some few Extracts out of the Journals of this House:
That they had considered the Matter to them referred;
and are of Opinion, That there is not any Objection
to the Petitioner's proceeding in the Publication of
his said Book, as desired in his Petition."

Which Report, being read by the Clerk, was agreed
to by the House.

Austen against Flack:

After hearing Counsel, upon the Petition and Appeal
of Thomas Austen Gentleman; complaining of a Decretal
Order of the Court of Exchequer in Ireland, of the
16th of May 1716; the Order on Re-hearing, the 8th
of December 1719, and the several Proceedings subsequent thereto; the Report of the Master, of the 14th of
July 1720, and the Order made for confirming the same;
several Orders of the 22d of May and 7th of December
1724; the Order of the 5th of February 1725; the
Report of the 10th of May 1731; and the several Orders which set aside the Appellant's Exceptions thereto,
and confirmed the same Report, and the Proceedings
subsequent thereto; as also a Decree of the 14th of
July following, made in a Cause wherein Anne Flack,
Widow and Executrix of James Flack Merchant, deceased, was Plaintiff, and the Appellant Defendant;
and praying, "That the same may be reversed:" As
also upon the Answer of the said Anne Flack put in to
the said Appeal; and due Consideration had of what
was offered on either Side in this Cause:

Decrees, &c. affirmed.

It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual
and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said
Petition and Appeal be, and is hereby, dismissed this
House; and that the several Orders, Decrees, and Proceedings, therein complained of, be, and are hereby,
affirmed.

Evelyn & al. against Evelyn & al.

The House being moved, "That a Day may be appointed, for hearing the Cause wherein Anne, Elizabeth, and Mary Evelyn, Infants, under the Age of
Twenty-one Years, by John Garth Esquire, their next
Friend, are Appellants, and Edward Evelyn and
James Evelyn his Son, Charles Boone and Mary his
Wife, and James Worseley, Respondents:"

It is Ordered, That this House will hear the said
Cause, by Counsel, at the Bar, on the First vacant Day
for Causes after those already appointed.