Why Star Trek Sucks

There are things like Picard and his Dixon Hill adventures, Data and Sherlock Holmes, Janeway and her gothic romance holonovel, those give a fairly diverse selection of tastes too. Sure, Dixon Hill and Holmes are both detectives, but there's a big difference in the style. Beverly was big on amateur theater. Miles and Bashir liked playing darts, and trains too I think, and all kinds of silly boyish hobbies. And there's regular poker games and gambling at Quark's.

Speaking of TUC, one criticism I've always had with Trek was elucidated quite nicely in Star Trek 6 during the dinner scene. Chekov makes an off-hand comment about all alien civilizations have a claim to "inalienable human rights", and Gorkon's daughter calls him a racist and mentions that the Federation is nothing but a "Homosapiens Only club."

And you know what? She's totally 100% correct. Despite the Federation being made up of over 150 planets, Starfleet seems to be >95% humans.

Now that might not be the case within the fictional universe, but that is how it's portrayed on TV. I would say TNG was especially guilty of this. Amongst the "background extras" and the crew who weren't main cast members, how many aliens did we ever see? I get that there's practical considerations involved, that there's a time/money cost associated with putting actors in the makeup chair for several hours just for the sake of visual diversity, but still. To the viewer, Starfleet looks very much like a Homosapiens only club in TOS and TNG.

And even the ship names are almost exclusively people/places/things from Earth. What, Starfleet can't name a ship after some famous historical Tellarite figure or some major city on Andoria? Tolstoy gets a Starfleet ship named after him, as if any alien in the 24th century even knows who the hell Tolstoy is.

And even the ship names are almost exclusively people/places/things from Earth. What, Starfleet can't name a ship after some famous historical Tellarite figure or some major city on Andoria? Tolstoy gets a Starfleet ship named after him, as if any alien in the 24th century even knows who the hell Tolstoy is.

And you know what? She's totally 100% correct. Despite the Federation being made up of over 150 planets, Starfleet seems to be >95% humans.

Click to expand...

Starfleet is the American Navy in space, with a dash of Royal Navy romance thrown in. This was true of TOS and just as true (despite the more cuddly, UN-friendly veneer they tried to give it) of TNG. Earth is a benign hegemony over the member planets of the Federation in the same way that America is seen (by itself and sometimes others) as in benign hegemony over the "free world."

The ships aren't just given Earth names. Most of them are American Navy ship names. Lincoln is described in TOS as an "early Earth President." The universe they venture forth into is arguably an analogue of the world from an American Navy vantage point, which leads to some of its limitations: there is one overwhelming power of self-evident obvious goodness (albeit getting more and more anxious about questions of internal corruption) with a few worthy but minor allies, pitted against a strange and often incomprehensible wider world whose peoples are backward and not-backward in proportion to their resemblance to oneself, and where some are just hostile for no good reason at all.

Yeah there were two or three examples of non-Earth specific ship names...and like 150 examples of Earth-specific ones. The point stands. You had the Gandhi, the Tolstoy, the Crazy Horse, the Melbourne, the Cairo, the Yosemite, the Yorktown, the Yellowstone, the list is endless. To anyone who isn't a human, these names are meaningless.

I get that the reason is to make the show more familiar and relatable to a (primarily) American audience, but it comes at the expense of in-universe realism and makes Starfleet come across as being the sole domain of humanity.

There's always a trade-off. Like using alien species as metaphors for social issues often comes at the expense of having them be one-note and homogenous.

For every person who complains that the Klingons are two-dimensional, I'm convinced there's another person who would complain about any effort to add "dimension" to them, claiming they were being written inconsistently. Sometimes you just can't win.

They have tons of dimension, all kinds of Klingons are seen. The lawyer in ENT, the chef, the merchants, the old wise Martok, the young testosterone driven males, the teenage metal heads, the woman using Quark to preserve her house, the conniving Duras sisters, Azetbur who was quite refined, religious nutters, doctors engaged in research..

We just remember the loud jerky ones because they are so loud and jerky.

I get that the reason is to make the show more familiar and relatable to a (primarily) American audience, but it comes at the expense of in-universe realism and makes Starfleet come across as being the sole domain of humanity.

Click to expand...

Well, I dunno. In-universe it's perfectly believable for there to be uneven levels of political and military power between member worlds of the Federation and for one race to have hegemonic power, it's only a bit dubious for it to be a projected United States. That it complicates Starfleet's claim to being truly representative in ways that are never really faced up to is a given, but no moreso than American hegemony's claim to truly representing "the free world" is / was complicated. (It's only a shame that they never brought themselves to really exploit those complexities for stories.)

We do see Klingon engineers around, they're just not 'honored' in society. I figure there are scientists on Kronos, they just get pushed around and disrespected. Plus they probably stole a lot of technology from races they conquered.

I'm not sure how canon this is, but apparently the Klingons got most of their current tech from aliens called the Hurq that invaded their world about 1000 years before TOS. That's how they got into space to begin with.