@Article{info:doi/10.2196/15407,
author="Fernandes, Chrystinne
and Miles, Simon
and Lucena, Carlos Jos{\'e} Pereira",
title="Detecting False Alarms by Analyzing Alarm-Context Information: Algorithm Development and Validation",
journal="JMIR Med Inform",
year="2020",
month="May",
day="20",
volume="8",
number="5",
pages="e15407",
keywords="alarm fatigue; alarm safety; false alarms; eHealth systems; remote patient monitoring; notification; reasoning; sensors",
abstract="Background: Although alarm safety is a critical issue that needs to be addressed to improve patient care, hospitals have not given serious consideration about how their staff should be using, setting, and responding to clinical alarms. Studies have indicated that 80{\%}-99{\%} of alarms in hospital units are false or clinically insignificant and do not represent real danger for patients, leading caregivers to miss relevant alarms that might indicate significant harmful events. The lack of use of any intelligent filter to detect recurrent, irrelevant, and/or false alarms before alerting health providers can culminate in a complex and overwhelming scenario of sensory overload for the medical team, known as alarm fatigue. Objective: This paper's main goal is to propose a solution to mitigate alarm fatigue by using an automatic reasoning mechanism to decide how to calculate false alarm probability (FAP) for alarms and whether to include an indication of the FAP (ie, FAP{\_}LABEL) with a notification to be visualized by health care team members designed to help them prioritize which alerts they should respond to next. Methods: We present a new approach to cope with the alarm fatigue problem that uses an automatic reasoner to decide how to notify caregivers with an indication of FAP. Our reasoning algorithm calculates FAP for alerts triggered by sensors and multiparametric monitors based on statistical analysis of false alarm indicators (FAIs) in a simulated environment of an intensive care unit (ICU), where a large number of warnings can lead to alarm fatigue. Results: The main contributions described are as follows: (1) a list of FAIs we defined that can be utilized and possibly extended by other researchers, (2) a novel approach to assess the probability of a false alarm using statistical analysis of multiple inputs representing alarm-context information, and (3) a reasoning algorithm that uses alarm-context information to detect false alarms in order to decide whether to notify caregivers with an indication of FAP (ie, FAP{\_}LABEL) to avoid alarm fatigue. Conclusions: Experiments were conducted to demonstrate that by providing an intelligent notification system, we could decide how to identify false alarms by analyzing alarm-context information. The reasoner entity we described in this paper was able to attribute FAP values to alarms based on FAIs and to notify caregivers with a FAP{\_}LABEL indication without compromising patient safety. ",
issn="2291-9694",
doi="10.2196/15407",
url="http://medinform.jmir.org/2020/5/e15407/",
url="https://doi.org/10.2196/15407",
url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32432551"
}