Pages

Friday, February 12, 2016

In the world of Bigfooting, there are very few female investigators out there who take Sasquatch research seriously and isn't in it for fame and glory. Diane Stocking Neiss is one of them with 40 years under her belt. Join us for the conclusion to her special 2-part interview on After Hours with Rictor where Diane addresses a critic of her work, helps Rictor reveal who the fourth female credible Bigfoot researcher is OF ALL TIME, and reveals something fundamentally shocking about the BFRO and Matt Moneymaker.

THIS POLLOCK WALKS INTO A STORE.THEN ASK'S -I WANT POLISH EGGS ,I WANT POLISH BACON---AND "I WANT SOME POLISH MILK"!!!!!! ------------WELL THE SALESMAN SAYS "I WOULD LIKE TO HELP YOU "-------- BUT THIS IS A SHOESTORE!!!HAAAA HAAAAA HAAA------BOOOOO--IDIOT--MORON!!!

OUCH! Not exactly a 5 star endorsement of old fat boy Moneymaker and this was from someone who had worked closely with him. But it's as I always suspected - it's all about the money to him and he will do anything to keep the legend alive including faking evidence.

Diane Neiss inadvertently revealed why she is "so yesterday", and no longer a cutting edge researcher. She says, "the main thing is collecting evidence". Wrong! Bigfoot research has evolved into communication, gaining cooperation and uncovering the mysteries of their paranormal abilities. Since Diane Neiss is "so yesturday", she is not even close to one of the top four researchers. She is just another highly opinionated, internet enabled, closed mind that Rictor can suck up to so that he keeps getting an invitation to the Beachfoot free for all.Since Diane and Todd are planning on boating up to BC when they retire, I guess that they have given up on getting together 25 million $$ to build that Bigfoot tourist trap.Diane talks out of both sides of her mouth. She identifies a footprint as being Bigfoot footprint. Except she just finished saying that essentially, "don't tell be that (a footprint) is Bigfoot related, unless you have video of a Bigfoot leaving it." Diane is a typical two faced researcher that demands the impossible from others, while she gives herself a free pass for not provided absolute proof.

First, Mr. Riolo REALLY needs to stop bringing up Bigfoot Bounty. Nobody cares about or even remembers some ancient ashcan release single season reality show on a third tier cable network. Every single time he introduces himself as "Rictor from WhateverTV's Who Gives a Damn" he only comes off as some sad sack has-been / never-was desperately clinging to his 15 minutes of fame.

After Hours is by a large margin the best, most professional bigfoot interview series out there, and that includes broadcast productions. Admittedly given the quality of most bigfoot media that's not saying very much, but it's still a show that even professionals could be proud of. And Off the Rictor is straight up hilarious. With all that going for him, it's just sad that he keeps clinging to Bigfoot Bounty.

Second, what's with all the vertical video? It looks ridiculously unprofessional. After Hours manages to line up some serious heavy hitters for guests, but it's hard to take them seriously with all that wasted blank screen space on each side. It's true that sometimes you have to do what you have to do to get the interview, but if they're going to phone it in, at least tell them to turn their phone sideways.

Mr. Riolo is doing some good work here, but he could be doing it even better.

Yep, Rictor is exposing the high profile do nothing researchers, as essentially, shooting blanks. Diane proved that she is shooting blanks because she failed to reveal exactly what her contribution to Bigfoot research is. Tammy Murray and Diane Neiss, contribute nothing to Bigfoot research today except act as disrupters because they attempt to inhibit the free exchange of field observations by demanding impossible to obtain proof, or it never happened. They are attempting to entirely neutralize, the distinct advantage of the internet for comparing notes by experienced field researchers who have trained themselves in both field observation and in looking for repetition of those observations. By always attempting to sabotage someones research, they think that this somehow makes them both a contributor to Bigfoot research, and a top female researcher. When neither is the case. They don't research because they don't get out in the field ever, with an open mind. Both of their minds have predecided what Bigfoot is, and they will ceaselessly cherry pick field experiences if any, to only support their preconceived and absolutely incorrect conclusions. Which makes them both a candidate for a top 10 detriment to Bigfoot research, instead of an asset.

Off The Rictor is devoted to Rictor getting back at everyone in general for a few people like myself, for giving him grief about publicly promoting homosexuality. Nothing more, nothing less.

After Hours is about Rictor promoting phony non-contributors who just happen to have the same preconceived opinions as to what they think Bigfoot is, as Rictor. It is also about him getting next years Beachfoot invitation. So After Hours is a corrupt internet theatrical presentation on several different levels, that consistently only presents one side of the story.

I suppose that's a valid complaint if your main interest in bigfoot research is productivity. For myself, I prefer credibility. I've seen more than enough misinterpreted tracks and blurry pictures already, thank you.

Also debunking falsehoods in research is contributing to that research. It's probably the most important contribution of all. Peer review is important in any research, including bigfoot research. Especially in bigfoot research.