Legal Reference and Example of Precedence in U.S. Federal Kidnapping Case Involving Minors

Legal Reference and Example of Precedence in U.S. Federal Kidnapping Case Involving Minors

Hi,

I'm looking for references, case laws and precedence in US federal law in regards to the case out lined below, as well as proof that this is not considered kidnapping.

Please see attachment "Aron Rosner Complaint" and "Helbrans Rosner Complaint" for the nature for the nature of charges.

For examples of cases that can be used for project I attached two case laws. Macklin and Chatwin

Based on numerous case laws that I've reviewed it seems there is no basis for the charges, due to the following:

All actions were with consent and direct request from the minors themselves.

Was a rescue operation from severe physical and psychological abuse at foster home, under 24 hour lockdown with no access to a phone or legal counsel, and deprived of kosher food, and mentally tortured by agressive.

All actions were solely for benefit of minors.

Perpetrators had no personal motivation or benefit or intent for such.

Children escaped from foster home and entered car by own will.

Children were and free to go at all times with access to phone.

Charge should be International Parental Kidnapping rather than simple kidnapping, and in compliance with the Hague Convention.

When encountered with law enforcement in USA and Mexico, minors always insisted to return and to be only with the ones arrested.

No force or intent for such.

No violence or intent for such.

Father requested to assist the children in whatever they request.

Legal custody for mother was never enforced.

Mother kidnapped children from habitual residence (Guatemala) to USA, therefore jurisdiction for family court should be habitual residence which is Guatemala, additionally father's denial of custody is contrary to the Hague convention.

Children were simply being returned to their rightful guardian.

ACS lied to father in their office on whereabouts of children, meanwhile court was held ex-parte and ACS lied to court that father is in prison (while father was in their office).

Custody order was only temporary - not final.

Custody order was never enforced - minors placed in foster home outside jursidiction of court not in mothers custody as ordered.

Rabbi Nachman is family member (Uncle) and acted in the best intrest of the children within this parental conflict.

10 freelancers are bidding on average $156 for this job

Greetings,
I am Noel, A PROFICIENT LAW WRITER with a deep knowledge in case laws and precedence in US federal law. I am a TOP-RATED researcher with several years’ experience and over 10,000 completed research projectMore

Hi,
I'm looking for references, case laws and precedence in US federal law in regards to the case out lined below, as well as proof that this is not considered kidnapping.
Please see attachment "Ar... Read More

My qualifications include the following:
Drafting, reviewing, negotiating, and litigating contracts, leases, regulatory filings, and a broad range of other legal documents for companies including Raincheck, Blended More

Hello,
Attention to detain and a desire for perfection is the name of the game when it comes to the development of legal documents. We take into consideration the requirements of all involved parties and marry it withMore

hello, my name is Nimi. I am a lawyer with over 5 years experience in legal drafting. this is why I am perfect for this job, I have a 5 year experience in extensive research work with proofs and I have worked on over More

Legal Services Group, LLC. specializes in Federal criminal matters. We work with clients all across the Untied States that have been charged with various federal crimes. Typically, we get involved post-sentencing witMore

International Lawyer, HR professional and translator with over fifteen years of experience. LLM, International executive MBA, MSc. Human Resources Management and CIPD certified. Expertise in HR strategy, employment lawMore