" 5 March. An interstellar colony starship on its maiden voyage experiences a malfunction, causing one of its cryo-frozen passengers to wake up prematurely, with 99 years to go before landfall. This sci-fi looked to have everything: grand visual effects, amazing visual sets and futuristic tech of our wildest imagination. And the thing that seemed to be lacking is the chemistry between the two leads, not that memorable as a couple, Lawrence and Pratt just didn't work as a team."

"6 / 10 - I didn't have much expectations but it wasn't that bad. I am not a fan of Jennifer Lawrence but she doesn't do a bad work. Overall, it is a barely average movie. Not too good neither too bad. I felt like there wasn't much chemistry between both actors which is a turn down and the film was slow and many times kinds boring but I was able to enjoy some parts as well. "

"
It's supposed to be a tribute to Stanley Kubrick - a little of 2001: A Space Odyssey, the bar set resambling the one in Shining - but actually Passengers is disappointing, often boring and generally closer to a young adult flick than a real sci-fi movie. "