I chose this problem because solving it doesn't require knowing any concepts beyond multiplication and multiples.

I solved this problem kind of a "crude" way; however upon thinking my solution through, it is fairly accessible to even younger students, because it doesn't use more sophisticated concepts.

Basically I considered the problem as finding ABC (A, B, and C are digits), or possibly a longer or shorter number such as 144 x ABC ends in 144.

144x ABC-----

I systematically checked what C can be in order for the answer to end in 4.

I found only one possible digit works.

Then I systematically checked what B can be, knowing that C must equal 6 -- and found two possible digits: 2 and 7.

After that, I stumbled upon the right answer since I simply checked what is 26 x 144, 76 x 144 and 126 x 144. The last one is the multiple we're looking for - it is 18,144.

Like I said, this method IS accessible to students who have mastered multiplication algorithm.

Another solution, essentially by John Morse:

This one uses the concept of a "digital root", which means essentially the remainder when dividing a number by 9. You can find it out by adding the digits of a number until you get a sum less than 10.

For example, the digital root of 28,294 is found this way: 2 + 8 + 2 + 9 + 4 = 25; 2 + 5 = 7.When finding the digital root (or divisibility by 9), you can always "cast out nines" or any combination of numbers adding up to nine - in other words, omit them from the total sum. In the above example, it's enough to add 2 + 8 + 2 + 4 = 16; 1 + 6 = 7 to obtain the digital root.

We're looking for a multiple of 144 that ends in ...144. Since 144 is a multiple of 16, ITS multiples will also be multiples of 16. Similarly, 144 is a multiple of 9, thus ITS multiples will also be multiples of 9 (divisible by 9).

Then, we do know our number will be greater than 1,000. The number we look for is (some thousands) + 144 since it must end in 144. Since 144 is a multiple of 16, those whole thousands tacked to our multiple must be also be multiples of 16. 1000 is NOT a multiple of 16, whereas 2000 (and its multiples, all having even-number thousand's place digits) ARE multiples of 16.

Hence, it remains to find the digits in front of ...144 such that they, placed together, form a multiple of 9 AND 2. The least such digit pair is 1 & 8, putting even digit 8 in the thousands's place, and thus forming 18144.

Popular posts from this blog

I was just sent a link to this site; all it is, is a handy one-page printable conversion chart for various US measures, metric measures, and US vs. metric measures. Includes even a comparative Fahrenheit vs. Celsius thermometer.

Here's an enjoyable math video for students and parents/teachers alike. It's about folding and cutting... but it still IS very much about math -- because the lady models the basics of mathematical thinking in a wonderful way as she goes on cutting shapes... 😊

People sometimes ask me of my opinion or review of Saxon math. What I've written here applies in particular to Saxon Math's high school courses and middle grade levels. (The grades K-3 are by a different author and are quite different; more on that below.)

Saxon Math uses an "incremental approach" where math concepts are studied in little pieces over several lessons, and those lessons are strawed over a long period of time, intermixed with lessons about other topics.

In other words, if one lesson is on some particular topic (say, percentages or inequalities), it's almost guaranteed that the NEXT lesson is NOT on that topic. It jumps around from topic to topic constantly, and this is by design.

Saxon's method also includes a feature where after a lesson is taught, there are very few practice problems about the topic of the lesson. Most of the problems are mixed review problems, and they practice concepts from earlier lessons, not the concept …