On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 23:44, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 18:55, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:>> meta-oe/classes/systemd.bbclass | 72 +++++++++++++++++++------------------->> 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)>> This broke it; I am fixing it and will send a patch soon.
I ended sending two patches to fix this. The second one is the right
to be take since it fix the packaging and parsing. Sorry by this
mistake.

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 23:44, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 18:55, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:>>> meta-oe/classes/systemd.bbclass | 72 +++++++++++++++++++------------------->>> 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)>>>> This broke it; I am fixing it and will send a patch soon.>> I ended sending two patches to fix this. The second one is the right> to be take since it fix the packaging and parsing. Sorry by this> mistake.>
I was about to send a revert - but it's too late now -because I
haven't understood what the original patch is for. Could you please
tell us what it fixes / enhances?
Andreas

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 09:06, Andreas Müller
<schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I was about to send a revert - but it's too late now -because I> haven't understood what the original patch is for. Could you please> tell us what it fixes / enhances?
The parsing where being properly skipped in case of native, nativesdk
and cross however the packaging addition not; so it ended up trying to
build cross and native packages; in my case it broken an internal
package that is built using chicken and is cross.