Main menu

Post navigation

Screening of multiple microRNAs revealed that mature miR-132 and

Screening of multiple microRNAs revealed that mature miR-132 and miR-212 are upregulated, whereas miR-219 is downregulated 2 h after induction of LTP. Treatment with an antagonist of group

I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR) prevented these changes in expression, leaving LTP unaffected. MGluR-dependent depotentiation prevented the LTP-related changes in microRNA expression. Curiously, inhibition of LTP with an NMDA receptor antagonist led to increases in the expression of all three microRNAs studied. Creation of microRNA occurs in three steps: firstly, primary transcripts are generated (pri-miRNA) that possess a cap and poly-A tail. These are then converted in the soma into short, 70-nucleotide stem-loop structures GSK2118436 solubility dmso known as pre-miRNA, before subsequent

processing to mature microRNAs in the cytoplasm (Denli et al., 2004). Wibrand et al. (2010) also examined the expression of microRNA precursors: LTP-inducing HFS resulted in a 50-fold increase of primary and precursor miR-132 and miR-212. These effects were blocked by treatment with a protein synthesis inhibitor or a group I mGluR antagonist, but were unaffected by an NMDA receptor antagonist. The precursor to the third microRNA studied (miR-219) was unaffected by LTP. LTP induction in the dentate gyrus typically requires activation of the NMDA receptor and may also involve activation of L-type voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) (Morris et al., 1986; Manahan-Vaughan et al., 1998). One may speculate http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Gefitinib.html that the increased microRNA expression seen when HFS was given in the presence of the NMDA receptor antagonist activates VGCCs and/or glutamate binding to non-NMDA receptors. In the hippocampal dentate gyrus, group I mGluRs regulate depotentiation (Kulla and Manahan-Vaughan, 2007; Wu et al., 2004) and are critically involved in the maintenance of

LTP for periods longer than about 2 h (Naie & Manahan-Vaughan, P-type ATPase 2005; Bikbaev et al., 2008). However, the role of group I mGluRs in LTP may depend on the strength of LTP, at least in in vitro preparations (Wilsch et al., 1998; Wu et al., 2008). The authors did not see an effect on LTP following administration of a group I mGluR antagonist, but this may alternatively relate to the fact that LTP was only followed for 2 h. Thus, whether the reported regulation of microRNA expression by group I mGluRs relates to their regulation of LTP remains an open question. The authors conclude that the differences between the regulation of these microRNAs by HFS, and regulation in the presence of antagonists of NMDA receptors or mGluRs, are explained by the differential roles of these receptors in the regulation of expression of mature and precursor microRNAs, which in turn contributes to LTP. The study by Wibrand et al.