Moral science has two halves. There are the implications of thinking straight about fact and value (ideal theory) and there are the implications of not thinking straight. Ideal theory is the foundation, error theory the daily battle.

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Obama equates the Muslim law of hate with the Christian law of love

For if there is one law that we can be most certain of, it is the law that binds people of all faiths and no faith together. It is no coincidence that it exists in Christianity and Judaism; in Islam and Hinduism; in Buddhism and humanism. It is, of course, the golden rule - the call to treat one another as we wish to be treated. The call to love. To serve. To do what we can to make a difference in the lives of those with whom we share the same brief moment on this earth.

So many of you at Notre Dame - by the last count, upwards of 80 percent - have lived this law of love through the service you've performed at schools and hospitals; international relief agencies and local charities.

In fact the Christian "law of love" (the Commandment of Jesus to "love your neighbor") is explicitly universal. Asked "who is my neighbor," Jesus answered with the parable of the good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37). The Koran, in contrast, is explicit that its call to treat others in a loving way is NOT universal:

Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves. [Koran verse 48.29]

O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the Hypocrites, and be firm against them. Their abode is Hell,- an evil refuge indeed. [9.73]

The Koran is replete with instructions for carrying out this "law of hatred" as one might call it:

I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them. [8.12]

Fight them, and Allah will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame.... [9.14]

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. [9.29]

Obama knows the Koran

Obama is fully aware that the Islamic version of the golden rule applies only to other Muslims. Not only did he study the Koran as a boy, but he even studied "menjaji," which is the Indonesian term for recitation of the Koran in Arabic. Menjaji is the gold-standard of fundamentalist Islamic education. This is how Obama was able to recite the Shahada for NYT columnist Nicholas Kristof "with a first rate [Arabic] accent." He was drilled on it.

The Shahada is the Islamic profession of faith: "I witness that there is no god but Allah; I witness that Muhammad is his prophet." According to Sharia law, a single sincere utterance of this profession of faith constitutes conversion to Islam. The Shahada comes at the beginning of the Islamic call to prayer, which Obama recited for Kristof. Judge for yourself whether his utterance was sincere:

Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it’ll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”

Having drilled the Shahada as a boy, Obama certainly knew what it meant to recite these words to Kristof. Obama IS a Muslim.

If he were a moral Muslim, he would speak about the need for Islamic reform, instead of covering up the unpleasant truths of orthodox Islam. By hiding his own Islam, Obama is following another unpleasant truth about orthodox Islam: that it is a religion of deceit.

Tabari's History recounts the story of Nuaym, a recent convert to Islam, who set Muhammad's enemies against eachother at the Battle of the Trench:

‘I ‘ve become a Muslim, but my tribe does not know of my Islam; so command me whatever you will.' Muhammad said, ‘Make them abandon each other if you can so that they will leave us; for war is deception.' [Tabari volume 8, p. 23. This incident is also recorded in Ishaq's Life of Muhammad, p. 458.]

Like Nuaym, Obama's tribe does not know of his Islam either. (Well, his African tribe does, but his American tribe does not.) That is the price we pay for America's Ignorance about Islam. With just a little knowledge about Islam, we can even tell what kind of Muslim Obama is. His deceptions about Islam demonstrate that he is orthodox. He tells the same "religion of peace" lies that CAIR and other Muslim Brotherhood organizations tell.

When ignorant multi-culturalists call Islam a religion of peace, they are just following their own injunction to respect every culture but western liberty (which they call oppressive). But Obama is not an ignorant multi-culturalist. He knows his Islam. When he calls Islam a religion of peace, the meaning is very clear: "war is deceit."

You once wrote a piece called"The Maximum Likelihood Obama" and it migt be a good opportunity to re-visit this question.

I think there are four present theories about who this Obama guy is and what his mission is.

Theory A, the only non-Manchurian candidate theory, says that Obama isan inexperienced and not ready for prime-time guy also suffering from Narcissistic Personalty Disorder.

Theory B says t hat Obama is a highly trained Marxist, schooled by the likes of Saul Alinsky and Cloward-Piven in the methods of using a series of increasingly disasterous (but planned)crisis events to ultimately cause thefinancial and social collapse of America, and in the chaos that follows, the population will accept Communism to feed them and save their children's lives.

Theory C says that Obama is actually a secret Moslem jihadist, hiding behingthe islamic concept of Taqiyya, to bring out about the total failure first of theUSA, then the Western world in general, and that to be followed by the actual military destruction of all those weakened countries. In this theory,ALinsky, and the American Left are justdupes.

Theory D says that Obama is neithera Communist nor a serious Muslim. He is instead, an operative of Bilderbergand those who actually tell Bilderbergwhat to do. His mission is to secure the one world government that the elites have been working towards for decades. This plan is blocked at the moment mostly by the islamic world's insistence that if there is to be any one world government it will be islamic and run under sharia law. This is not what Bilderberg are about. Bilderberg are about wealth for a few, power and (their) freedom, not about bowing to a god of a religion. So the islamic problem has to be solved, either by getting the moslems on board through a deal, that deal being the destruction of israel, and the hardline states that won't accept the deal are to be destroyed. This theory thinks that only a muslim US president can be the one seen to do this.

So which one, if any, are true.At the moment, the evidence is scattered between all of them. This could mean that either none of them are true, or that the planning has been so very very careful. Careful planning supports Theory B or Theory D. Theory C nedsa rogue muslim genius, less likely.The noticeable phenomenon has been t he widespread failure of our Courts or our Congress to become even interested in the 700 pound gorilla in the room..

I fear that by the time the answer isknown, if it gets that far, it will be too late.

I am not familiar with the Bilderberg theory, but it would be excluded by what I am pretty sure is the actual case: that Obama is both an Islamic supremacist and a communist. His mentors Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright both fall in this camp as well.

Ayers calls himself a communist while adopting the Nation of Islam name "Abu Zayd." His personal logo is a communist star, folded on one side to form and Islamic crescent and star. The nominally Christian Wright gets called an "ex-Muslim," but his church teaches the Islamic law of hate instead of the Christian law of love, just with the standard Nation of Islam twist: that parishioners should love each other while hating WHITE people. Trinity United also embraces NOI leader Louis Farrakhan, and teaches an explicitly anti-capitalist creed.

I have written a couple of times how virtually ALL of Obama's long-time mentors and confidants (who we know about) are not just Muslim, but are Islamofascist. What I haven't yet highlighted are these people's communist sympathies, which go on and on.

Obama's FATHER (the one he dreams about) was both an Islamic supremacist and a communist. The model for Obama's emerging thugocracy--Hugo Chavez--is not just a Castroist, but has apparently converted to Islam, and now uses Islamic salutations.

Raila Odinga, Obama's nominally Christian "cousin" (who is certainly one of Obama's closest political allies), is not just a secret Muslim (outed in 2007 by Muslim leaders who decided to brag about his promise to impose Sharia law on Kenya), but is also a communist, educated in East Germany by his communist father. Odinga's primary financial backer, Moammar Gaddafi, is another Islamic supremacist with long communist ties.

The emerging world-wide Islamofascist-left alliance is mostly a marriage of convenience. Most communists are not attracted to Islam per se, and most Islamic supremacists are only attracted to communism as a way of attacking and bringing down the infidel capitalists. (Capitalism is "zionist," per convenience.)

Obama and his cohorts are out in front of this unholy alliance, ideologically committed both to communist supremacy and to Islamic supremacy.

I'm not sure if this is a rant. However, Obama is not any expert on anything religious. The man thinks he is God. He's the LEAST qualified of all people to discuss religion. He's the lowest of lows and the worst of the worst.

Anyway, God didn't say "love others" out of a narcissistic void. God would call that the "love of this world". God commanded us FIRST to LOVE GOD above ALL OTHERS and to HAVE NO FALSE GOD BEFORE HIM!!!! (Something this false messiah and supreme narcissist megalomaniac would know nothing about at this time.) Why?? Because God Himself is LOVE. Apart from Him, there can be no Divine Love which comes from Heaven.

So, first we are to LOVE GOD with all our hearts, minds, souls and strength. THEN, we are to love others AS we love ourselves.

God expects us to be OWNERS - and it is God who has given us ownership. God has given us inheritance in HIM. We have PERSONHOOD... and that personhood is in our individual identity - which derives substance and being from our RELATIONSHIP with GOD our CREATOR. We can only give to others what we personally OWN as individuals. So, first we honor God as God. Then, we embrace individuality and personal ownership of ourselves. THEN, out of LIBERTY - the LIBERTY of the SONS OF GOD - in individual OWNERSHIP in PERSONAL IDENTITY - we give love freely to others. Because we ourselves have freely received love from God our Father who IS LOVE. This is how Divine Love works.

But, to Obama (who is an empty lost soul), man is the center of all things and collectiveness is the way to love. We are to give up all ownership, all individual identity, and "love" others by, well, controlling them as if we were god. That's how his inner life functions and how he views life. The man is an evil, lost, depraved soul who is a communist because he is so empty. He is so empty because he has rejected God from above - and it's all about him as the center of all things. And that's what he's trying to "teach us all".

The man is empty, lost, narcissistic, insane (depravity of sin - narcissism - megalomaniac - God-complex, etc.)... and he's going to go to a Catholic university - lift up all Gods as equal - and name himself the center of all religious knowledge??

The hubris.

The man is the 666 beast of Revelation, I'm believing - and he's going to preach to us??

He's a blind man seeking to enforce blindness on all of us.

Get thee behind me, Obama. I have seen Jesus Christ!! God alone will I serve!!

Watch "The Obama Deception" for insight on the Bilderberg connection. It's the NWO "shadow government" - and, I believe, the illuminati being used to fulfill the book of Revelation one world government.

He's not really even his own "true self". He's consumed by increasing emptiness and the void is increasingly filled with the malignancy of ego and evil.

Satan is a schemer. "We are not ignorant of the devil's schemes." Satan is seeking world domination.

Satan, of course, conspires. And, at times, like he did in the Pharisees and like he did in the person of Judas - Satan finds, controls, and possesses human beings who become co-conspirators.

The Book of Revelation is not fulfilled apart from conspiracy.

Of course, when the scriptures are fulfilled, there will be conspirators - so we should be examining what is behind Obama - not just looking at appearances or surface things.

Obama is possessed, imo.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw

This is about the Bilderberg group - and the scheme (it's published - they've stated their goals though the background information is illuminati, satanic, and lines up perfectly, imo, with the Book of Revelation) and their relationship to Obama, etc.

About Me

Here is a short bio I sent to press people covering the Flight 93 memorial debacle. My training is as an economist. I was in the PhD program in economics at Stanford until my research led me more towards moral theory and constitutional law, at which point I dropped the program and started working on my own. I was writing a book on republicanism (the system of liberty under law) for World Ahead Publishing when I discovered that the Flight 93 memorial was going to be a terrorist memorial mosque. World Ahead agreed to first publish my book about this rehijacking of Flight 93 (Crescent of Betrayal, temporarily available for free download at CrescentOfBetrayal.com). This is not my first venture into journalism. Over the years I have been a writer, opinions editor, and advisor for Stanford’s conservative campus newspaper The Stanford Review, and am currently on the Review’s board of directors.