Wednesday, March 11, 2015

TRUE UNITS AND THE NATURAL ELEMENTS OF THE PERIODIC TABLE

Atoms
are semi-stable structures composed of electrons, protons and neutrons. They
are not as stable as protons and neutrons, but they are generally more stable
than molecules.

The Elements of the Periodic Table

The Hydrogen atom is unique among
the natural elements in that it has only two mass/energy components, the electron
and proton. Thus, because Fermat’s Last Theorem prohibits the symmetrical
combination of two symmetrical particles; they cannot combine to form stable
structures like the combination of quarks to form the proton and neutron. The
electron, with a small fraction of the mass of the proton, is drawn by electric
charge to whirl around the proton, seeking stability. This
means that the Hydrogen atom, the elemental building block of the universe,
composed only of the mass and energy of an electron and a proton, is inherently
unstable. So why is it that we have any stable structures at all; why is
there a universe? As Leibniz queried: “why
is there something rather than nothing”?

One of the Xn integers must be 24 to represent the TRUE unit value
of the proton, and among the integer solutions of the m = n = 3 conveyance equation listed above there are four solutions
with 24 as one of the Xn solution
integers. Nature is parsimonious, and we must never make a mathematical
description or demonstration any more complicated than it has to be. Therefore,
we start with the smallest solution with 24 as one of the Xn integers. It is 33
+ 183 + 243 = 273. But it does
not contain an Xn equal
to 38, so we must continue, searching for an integer solution that contains
both 24 and 38 on the left side of the equation. Since there are no smaller integer solutions
with co-multiples of 24 and 38 as terms in the left side of the equation, we
can use the solution that provided a stable Helium atom: 243
+ 383 + 1063 = 1083. Using it to represent the
Hydrogen atom, we have:

TRUE-Unit Analysis
for Hydrogen 1 (Protium), Valence = - 2 + 1 = -1

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

Total
TRUE Units

Volume

e

- 3

1

105

106

1,191,016

P+

+ 3

17

7

24

13,824

Cג*

0

0

38

38

54,872

Totals

0

18

150

168

1,259,712=1083

*Since the Proton
required 17 mass/energy units and 7 גunits, adding up to
24 Total TRUE units, to achieve triadic stability (see the Tables describing
the Proton), to achieve the same level of stability as the proton and neutron,
the Hydrogen atom must have a third additive component, Cג,
consisting of 38 גunits, the third form
of the ‘stuff’ of reality, not measureable as mass or energy in 3S-1t. This
satisfies the conveyance equation and produces a stable Hydrogen atom with a total
volume of 1083.

Without the ג units needed by Hydrogen to achieve stability, we would have no
universe. The TRUE units of two symmetrically stable entities, the electron and
proton, could not combine to form a third symmetrically stable entity (Fermat’s
Last Theorem). Because of the asymmetry of their form as two symmetric entities
of different sizes in TRUE units, they could not combine; they would spiral and
be easily separated by any external force. Even if they could adhere to other
particles, the resulting universe would be very boring. All multiples of such a
building block would have the same chemical characteristics. With the input of
the appropriate number of ג units, Hydrogen
is a basic building block of symmetrically stable forms in the 3S–1t observable
domain of the physical universe.

In 3S-1t, TRUE units can manifest as
mass, energy or ג, in order to form symmetrically stable
particles and the 168 total TRUE units of the Hydrogen atom may be arranged in another
stable structural form, observed as the simple combination of one electron, one
proton and one neutron, known as Deuterium, an isotope of Hydrogen (an atom with the same chemical properties).

Hydrogen 2 (Deuterium), Valence = -2 + 1 = -1

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

Volume

e

-
3

1

105

106

1,191,016

P+

+
3

17

7

24

13,824

N0

0

22

16

38

54,872

Totals

0

40

128

168

(108)3

Hydrogen 2 (H2) is held together by
electrical charge and 128 ג units, 22
less than the H1 atom. This means that H2 is not as stable as H1. What about
other isotopes of H1? Is it possible that the TRUE units of a Hydrogen atom or
a Deuterium atom can combine with one or more additional neutrons to form stable
isotopes? Hydrogen 3 (H3), known as Tritium, is a second isotope of Hydrogen.
Its form in TRUE units is represented below.

Hydrogen 3 (Tritium), Valence = - 2 + 1 = -1

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

Volume

e

- 3

1

105

106

1,191,016

P+

+ 3

17

7

24

13,824

2N0

0

44

32

76

438,976

Totals

0

62

144

206

(118.018…)3 *

*We see
that H3 is an asymmetric structure. One electron, one proton and two neutrons,
brought together by attractive forces, cannot combine volumetrically to form a
symmetrically stable structure, and as a result, it is unstable and there are
very few H3 atoms. Looking at the TRUE unit structure for H1, H2 and H3, we see
that all three are bonded by electrical charge, but H1 has volumetric stability
and 150 ג units holding it together;
H2 has volumetric stability, more mass/energy units and fewer ג units than H1; and H3 has more
mass/energy units and ג units, but no volumetric stability. This explains why
H1 is the most abundant, H2 less abundant, and H3 correspondingly less stable. The
atomic weights of the elements of the periodic table, in amu (atomic mass units), are actually the mean values of atomic
masses calculated from a great number of samples. The accepted mean atomic
weight for Hydrogen to four significant figures is 1.008. This includes H1 and
all isotopes of Hydrogen. If all hydrogen atoms were H1 atoms, this number
would be exactly 1. H1 is by far the most stable, and therefore, most abundant,
of the Hydrogen family, making up more than 99.99% of all Hydrogen in the
universe. Other H isotopes make up the remaining 0.01%, mostly H2, with H3 and
other isotopes heavier than H2 occurring only rarely in trace amounts.

STABILITY AND PARTICLE BONDING

In this TRUE unit analysis of
Hydrogen and its isotopes, we can identify the four forces that affect the
stability of structures composed of protons, neutrons and electrons, holding
together the entities that make up the physical universe. They are, in order of
strength, dimensionometric tethering, represented by ג
(gimmel), the attractive forces of electrical charge, magnetism and gravity.
The first is the organizing force of the transfinite substrate, mediated by the
conveyance equation to produce negative entropy. The last three are products of
relative motion in resistance to negative entropy and universal expansion. First,
structures with more ג units are
more strongly connected with the nine-dimensional structure of the substrate.
Second, if the collection of elementary particles cannot combine to form a
symmetric structure in accordance with the FLT restriction and an integer
solution of the Conveyance Equation, the collection of particles will not stay together
long, even if attracted together by gravity, magnetism and opposite charge to
become electrically neutral. The stronger forces of rotational expansion and the
impacts of external forces will cause such structures to spiral and fly apart.

It
may seem odd that the ratio of ג units to mass/energy units for the
electron in these three atomic structures is so much greater than for the other
elementary particles; but, as we saw above, these numbers are not arbitrary;
they are dictated by the quantum nature of our 3S-1t reality, and the integer
solutions of the Diophantine equations of the Conveyance Expression. Recall
also, that units of ג, mass and energy, integrated through
application of the principles of the Special Theory of Relativity and Quantum
Mechanics, are equivalent in TRUE units. Thus, it should be expected that the
volume the electron occupies in each orbital shell contributes more to the
number of TRUE units for the electron in contrast with the other particles
occupying less volumetric equivalence.

Note
that atomic and sub-atomic structures are spinning like vortices connecting the
dimensional domains. The stability of an atom is less than that of electrons,
protons and neutrons. The stability of an atom depends upon whether its
components can combine volumetrically, the attraction of the opposite electric
charges of spinning electrons and protons, nuclear symmetric stability, and the
symmetry created by their high rate of rotation, or vortical spin.

The
impact of the ג units in 3S-1t observations
reflects the logic of the conscious substrate, so thinking of ג as units of consciousness or intelligence,
working through the equations of the Conveyance Expression is justifiable, and comparing
the ratio of ג units to mass/energy
units for elementary particles, elements, molecules and compounds provides a
relative measure of consciousness in all physical structures. Finally, we see
that with Hydrogen atoms and neutrons as building blocks, the entire periodic
table of elements is produced and their physical and chemical characteristics can
be explained in terms of their structure in TRUE units.

In the conventional description of
the combining of elements and molecules to form new entities, first, two basic
types of bonding are identified: covalent and ionic. Covalent bonding is also
described as atoms sharing outer shell (valence) electrons. Ionic bonding
occurs when ions of opposite electrical charge, are drawn together. An atom is
called an ion when it has a different number of electrons than protons, and an
atom with more electrons than protons is called a negative ion, and with fewer,
it is called a positive ion. These two types of bonding seem simple enough, but
it appears that there are more complex compound types of bonding that require
additional descriptions and visual representations: There is polar covalent
bonding, non-polar and hybrid bonding. There are Hydrogen bonds, metallic bonds,
and Van der Waals bonds. We will not spend time discussing all of the types of
bonding described in the current paradigm here, because TRUE unit analysis
provides us with an almost entirely different way of understanding how
particles combine.

Looking at the TRUE-unit structure
of quarks, Hydrogen, Deuterium and Tritium, we see that the way the sub-atomic
components are combined determines the symmetry and stability of the resulting compound
entity. When three elementary particles combine, like the three quarks of a
proton or neutron, with the necessary units of ג, they are combined volumetrically,
forming a new symmetrically stable structure. This type of combination is the
most stable. There are no electrons to be stripped off and such a compound particle
can only be broken apart under extreme conditions, like the extreme heat and
pressure in the heart of a star, or the ultra-high-energy collisions of a
particle collider.

In H1, all of the TRUE units of the sub-atomic
particles, the electron and proton, with their quarks, have combined and
re-organized to form a new symmetric structure. Thanks to the stabilizing ג units they have combined
volumetrically to form a symmetrically stable and electrically neutral entity,
the Hydrogen atom. So instead of being inherently unstable, as it would be if
only composed of one electron and one proton, with the necessary units of ג, the Hydrogen atom is very stable.
However, because it has only one electron in its outer shell, which has room
for two electrons, it is not nearly as stable as the proton and neutron bonding
of quarks. H2 is volumetrically stable, but has a lower ג-to-mass/energy ratio than H1, making it still less stable. H3
could not combine volumetrically because it is composed of four sub-atomic entities,
not three (FLT again) so it is asymmetric and even less stable, held together
only by the attraction of equal and opposite electrical charge.

Using TRUE-unit analysis, we can
investigate every possible combination of H1 atoms and neutrons and determine
which combinations are the most stable. After Tritium, the next stable combination
of TRUE units, Helium, involves 336 TRUE units, as shown below.

HELIUM Valence = - 2 + 2 = 0 (Inert)

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

Total
TRUE

Units

Volume

2e

- 6

2

210

212*

9,528,128

2P+

+ 6

34

14

48

110,592

2N0

0

44

32

76

438,976

Totals

0

80

256

336

(2x108)3

Why is this not called “quadrium”, a third isotope of
Hydrogen? It is a new element because it has two electrons filling its outer
(and only) shell, so that it is not attracted to other atoms.

New
elements arise when a unique new combination of TRUE units, constructed using
multiples of the basic building blocks of electrons, protons and neutrons is formed.
The next element is the combination of the inert atom, Helium, with the
asymmetric atom, H3 with to form Lithium.

LITHIUM, Valence = – 2 + 3 = +1

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

3e

- 9

3

315

318

32,157,432

3P+

+ 9

51

21

72

373,248

4N0

0

88

64

152

3,511,808

Totals

0

142

400

542

(330.32…)3
*

* Since the total volume is not an
integer cubed, Lithium, like Tritium, is volumetrically asymmetric. It has a
stronger electrical bond than H3 and more ג
units connecting it with the multi-dimensional substrate for added stability, but
it is less stable because it is asymmetric.

THE TERTIARY LEVEL OF SYMMETRIC STABILITY – MOLECULAR
BONDING

We’ve
seen how quarks combine in very stable symmetric triads of TRUE units and how
atoms form stable or semi-stable vortices, spinning structures consisting of
stable triads of protons, neutrons and electrons. A third level of stable and
semi-stable structures occurs as molecules are formed from more complex combinations
of elemental atoms.

The Role of Valence

The number of electrons in the outer shell of an atom
determines the observable identifying chemical characteristics of an element
and with which other elements it can combine. Due to the quantized attractive
force of electrical charges, arising from quantized angular momentum and spin,
electrons are attracted to the oppositely charged protons in the nucleus of an
atom. Electrons, having a fraction (1/17) of the mass of photons, are pulled
into orbit around the protons of an atom, forming specific finite, graduated
concentric dimensional domains called “shells” enclosing the atom.

Using TRUE
unit analysis, we find that, as a consequence of the size of the atom and the electron
in TRUE units, the first shell has a volume of 212 TRUE units, the exact volume
of two electrons. The second shell, with a larger diameter, has a volume of 848
TRUE units, and thus can contain 848/106 = 8 electrons. The maximum number of
electrons that each shell can accommodate can be found by determining the volumetric
equivalence of each shell in TRUE units. The maximum number of electrons in
shells 1 through 6, respectively, is 2, 8, 18, 32, 50, and 72. As more complex
atomic structures are formed by the addition of more of the building blocks,
the finite volumes of the electron shells are filled with electrons, one after
the other.

Atoms
combine to form stable or semi-stable molecules in mathematically predictable
ways, depending on the number of electrons in their outer-most shells. If an
atom, even though electrically neutral and symmetrically stable, has room for
one or more electrons in its outer shell, it can combine with another atom with
that number of electrons in its outer shell to form a new structure. For
example, an H1 Hydrogen atom, which has one electron in its
two-electron-capacity shell, can combine with Lithium, which has its first
shell filled, and one electron in its second shell. In another example of electron
bonding, two Hydrogen atoms, with a combined two electron deficiency in the
outer shells, can bond with one Oxygen atom which has two electrons in its
outer shell. The first compound, Lithium Hydride, is never found in nature,
while the second, H2O, is the most abundant compound in nature. Why?

We are now
in a position to explain things with TRUE unit analysis that are not fully
understood or well explained by the standard model. For example, why are some elements
and compounds more abundant in nature than others? Why is the simple
valence-bonded compound Lithium Hydride never found in nature, while Hydrogen
Oxide (water), an only slightly more complex compound, is very abundant in
nature?

Lithium
Hydride is very unstable and reactive with other substances. The current
paradigm tries to explain compound bonding in terms of outer shell electrons,
largely ignoring the rest of the atom. With TRUE-unit analysis, we see that
when bonding occurs, some compounds are able to form symmetric structures,
while others are not. The reasons for this involve the total TRUE units of the
whole structure, including the other electron shells and the nucleus, not just
the outer electron shell. To illustrate this point, we can compare the TRUE
unit analyses for LiH and H2O:

Lithium Hydride, Valence 4 - 2 = +2

Atoms

Particles

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

Li + H2

4e

-12

4

420

424

76,225,024

4P+

+12

68

28

96

884,736

4N0+ Cג

0

88

102

190

6,859,000

Totals

0

0

160

512

672

83,968,760=(437.89…)3

H2O, Water, Valence = -2 -8 + 10 = 0

Atoms

Particles

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

2(H2)+O*

10e

10

1050

1060

1,191,016,000

10P+

170

70

240

13,824,000

8N0+2Cג

176

204

380

54,872,000

Totals

356

1,324

1,680

1,259,712,000=(1,080)3
=(10x108)3

*
See detailed TRUE units analysis for Oxygen listed in order below.

Comparing
the TRUE analysis for LiH with H2O, we can readily see why H2O
is more stable, and consequently more abundant in nature. LiH is strongly
electrically bonded, but symmetrically unstable with a valence of +2, while H2O
is even more strongly bonded electrically, volumetrically stable, and has a stable
outerelectron shell. H2O also has 790 more units of ג
connecting it more firmly with the multi-dimensional substrate.

In Dr.
David Stewart’s brilliant work integrating science and spirituality, “The
Chemistry of Essential Oils Made Simple, God’s Love Manifest in Molecules” ref, he notes that “Theoretically, the next
simplest possible atom [after Hydrogen] would be two electrons orbiting around two
protons …This would be Helium. …However, [this] is not how helium usually
occurs in nature … For some unknown reason, nature does not like Helium without
neutrons.”

TRUE unit
analysis explains why nature does not produce Helium without neutrons. TRUE unit
analysis reveals that sub-atomic particles combine to form new complex
structures in several ways: They can be drawn together by the forces of gravity
and magnetism, they can become attached, held together by equal and opposite
electric charge, they can share valence electrons, and if they have the exact mix
of TRUE units of mass/energy and ג that satisfies the conveyance equation, they
will form a stable, dimensionally symmetric structure. On the other hand, if
the mix of TRUE units cannot satisfy the conveyance equation, bonding will
produce asymmetric forms which will be semi-stable, or if their outershells are not full, even unstable, subject
to breaking apart when impacted by external forces, while forms volumetrically symmetric,
electrically neutral and without valence electrons will be very stable. Helium
without Neutrons, i.e. 2e + 2P+, cannot form a symmetrically stable
structure. See the TRUE analysis table below.

Helium without Neutrons:

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

2e

- 9

2

210

212

9,528,128

2P+

+ 9

34

14

48

110,592

Totals

0

36

224

260

(212.917…)3
*

*While
this combination is charge neutral, it is asymmetric, and therefore only
semi-stable, easily broken apart.

But why doesn’t a Helium atom achieve stability with more ג units as H1 did?

Helium without Neutrons, with Volumetric Symmetric Stability
from ג units:

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

Total
TRUE

Units

Volume

2e

- 6

2

210

212*

9,528,128

2P+

+ 6

34

14

48

110,592

2Cג

0

0

76

76

438,976

Totals

0

36

300

336

(2x108)3

To understand why this doesn’t happen, we have to look at
all of the factors that contribute to the stability of an atom. The three major
factors, in the three observable dimensions of 3S-1t, are electrical charge,
angular momentum and symmetry. These factors depend on the quantized nature of
mass, energy and ג, relative motion,
and distance from the center of the atom to the outer shell. The overall stability of an
atom depends on the combined effect of these factors on all three levels of the
atom: the quark, nuclear, and electron shell levels. The effects of these
factors are variably described in the current paradigm with terms like
polarity, broken symmetry, quantum states, Eigen vectors, and parity.

The Helium atom has electron-shell stability because the
first and only shell is full, while the Hydrogen atom does not, allowing it to
compensate with גunits. As shown below, Helium with neutrons, 2e + 2P+
+ 2N0 is volumetrically symmetric and electron-shell stable, and is,
therefore, the form of Helium most often found in nature. Valence is an
expression of the atom’s relative electron-shell stability. A symmetric atom
with no valence atoms is very stable.

HELIUM Valence = - 2 + 2 = 0 (Inert)

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

Total
TRUE

Units

Volume

2e

- 6

2

210

212*

9,528,128

2P+

+ 6

34

14

48

110,592

2N0

0

44

32

76

438,976

Totals

0

80

256

336

(2x108)3

The next natural
element after Lithium is Beryllium. Since it is asymmetric and has two valence
electrons, it is much less stable than Hydrogen (H1) and Helium.

Beryllium, Valence = – 2 + 4 = +2

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

MREV

4e

- 12

4

420

424

76,225,024

4P+

+ 12

68

28

96

884,736

5N0

0

110

80

190

6,859,000

Totals

0

182

528

710

(437.8976…)3

BORON, Valence = – 2 + 5 = +3

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

MREV

5e

- 15

5

525

530

148,877,000

5P+

+ 15

85

35

120

1,728,000

6N0

0

132

96

228

11,852,352

Totals

0

222

656

878

162,457,352=(545.648…)3

We see that Boron is also asymmetric
with valence electrons and is therefore semi-stable; but the next element,
Carbon, is more stable, being volumetrically symmetric. Carbon and the next two
atoms, Nitrogen and Oxygen are the most stable and abundant elements after
Hydrogen and Helium, and since they are not electron-shell stable, they readily
combine with Hydrogen to form natural organic compounds. This establishes
Hydrogen, Carbon, Nitrogen and Oxygen as the primary building blocks of life,
making up between 92% and 96% of living matter ref.

As we proceed with the TRUE unit
analysis, we will see that the other elements and compounds necessary for life
and the manifestation of consciousness in sentient beings are produced in
abundance by the organizing action of the third
form as ג units, and the conveyance equation.

CARBON, Valence = – 2
+ 6 = +4

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

MREV

6e

- 18

6

630

636

257,259,456

6P+

+ 18

102

42

144

2,985,984

6N0

0

132

96

228

11,852,352

Totals

0

140

768

1,008

272,097,792=6483

NITROGEN, Valence = – 2 + 7 = +5

Particle

Charge

Energy/Mass

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

MREV

7e

- 21

7

735

742

408,518,488

7P+

+ 21

119

49

168

4,741,632

7N0

0

154

112

266

18,821,096

Totals

0

280

896

1,176

432,081,216
=7563

OXYGEN, Valence = – 2 + 8 = +6

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

MREV

8e

- 24

8

840

848

609,800,192

8P+

+ 24

136

56

192

7,077,888

8N0

0

176

128

304

28,094,464

Totals

0

320

1,024

1,344

644,972,544=8643

Moving
on to Fluorine, we find it to be volumetrically asymmetric and volatile.

FLUORINE, Valence = – 2 + 9 = +7

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

MREV

9e

- 27

9

945

954

868,250,664

9P+

+ 27

153

63

216

10,077,696

10N0

0

220

160

380

54,872,000

Totals

0

382

1,168

1,550

(977,218…)3

NEON, Valence = – 2 – 8 + 10 = 0 (Inert)

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

Volume

10e

- 30

10

1050

1060

1,191,016,000

10P+

+ 30

170

70

240

13,824,000

10N0

0

220

160

380

54,872,000

Totals

0

400

1,280

1,680

1,259,712,000=10803

Notice that Hydrogen, Carbon,
Nitrogen, and Oxygen, the basic elements of organic life -thanks to the presence of ג in their atomic structure- are
volumetrically symmetric and have available valence electrons. Helium and Neon
are also symmetric, but are not among the basic elements of organic life
because they are inert and therefore unable to readily combine with Hydrogen.
All of the other elements analyzed so far, are asymmetric and less abundant in
nature.

It
is no accident that the reactive, volumetrically symmetric elements are
important building blocks of natural organic compounds, and that complex combinations
of them manifest life and consciousness.

SODIUM, Valence = – 10 +11 = +1

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

Volume

11e

- 33

11

1,155

1,166

1,585,242,296

11P+

+ 33

187

77

264

18, 399,744

12N0

0

264

192

456

94,818,816

Totals

0

462

1,424

1,886

(1,193.12…)3

MAGNESIUM, Valence = – 10 +12 = +2

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

Volume

12e

- 36

12

1,260

1,272

2,058,075,648

12P+

+ 36

204

84

288

23, 887,872

12N0

0

264

192

456

94,818,816

Totals

0

480

1,536

2,016

(12X108)3

ALUMINIUM*, Valence = – 10 + 13 = +3

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

Volume

13e

- 39

13

1,365

1,378

2,616,662,152

13P+

+ 39

221

91

312

30,371,328

14N0

0

308

224

532

150,568,768

Totals

0

542

1,680

2,222

(1,409.057…)3

*It
is my position that this is the correct spelling, consistent with metal
nomenclature, however, being an American, I tend to pronounce it ‘Aluminum’.

SILICON, Valence = -10 +14 = +4

Particle

Charge

Mass/Energy

ג

TotalTRUE
Units

Volume

14e

- 42

14

1,470

1,484

3,268,147,904

14P+

+ 42

238

98

336

37,933,056

14N0

0

308

224

532

150,568,768

Totals

0

560

1,792

2,352

1,5123=(14x108)3

Interestingly,
Silicon, Phosphorus, Sulfur and Chlorine are analogous in valence and structure
to Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Fluorine, prompting some to speculate that
under favorable conditions they might combine with Hydrogen in the same way to
form ‘Silicon-based’ life forms. Whether or not this could happen, these
elements are important and even necessary
for life as we know it. While not abundant in the human body, they are
abundant, along with the heavier, metallic elements in our life-supporting
environment, Planet Earth.

Clearly,
we can analyze all of the elements and the virtually endless molecular forms
existing in the observable universe in terms of TRUE units, with the potential
of explaining more real phenomena, anomalous empirical data and details not
explained by the current paradigm. I have personally spent thousands of hours
to date, and will spend many more exploring this fascinating new paradigm
created by putting consciousness into the equations of science. But for this
presentation, time and space are limited. I will close by summarizing the TRUE
analysespresented
so far.

The
table below summarizes the TRUE-unit properties of elements of the Periodic
Table from Hydrogen through Silicon.

SUMMARY OF TRUE UNIT ANALYSES OF THE ELEMENTS

Element

ג Units

Total TRUE

Percent ג Units

Valence

TRUE
Volume

Abundance
Rank

Hydrogen

150

168

89%

-1

1083

1

Deuterium

128

168

76%

-1

1083

Tritium

144

206

70%

-1

(118.02)3

Helium

256=2x128

336

76%

0

(2x108)3

2

?

(3x108)3

Lithium

400

74%

+1

(330.32)3

?

(4x108)3

Beryllium

582

74%

+2

(437.89)3

?

(5x108)3

Boron

656

74%

+3

(545.65)3

Carbon

768=6x128

76.2%

+4

(6x108)3

4

Nitrogen

896=7x128

76.2%

+5

(7x108)3

6

Oxygen

1,024=8x128

1,344

76.2%

+6

(8x108)3

3

?

(9x108)3

Fluorine

1,168

1,550

75.4%

+7

(977.22)3

Neon

1,280=10x128

1,680

76.2%

0

(10x108)3

3

Element

ג Units

Total TRUE

Percent ג Units

Valence

TRUE
Volume

Abundance
Rank

?

(11x108)3

Sodium

1,424

1,886

75.5%

+1

(1,193.12)3

Magnesium

1,536=12x128

2,016

76.2%

+2

(12x108)3

9

?

(13x108)3

Aluminium

1,680

2,222

75.6%

+3

(1,409.06)3

Silicon

1,792

2,352

76.2%

+4

(14x108)3

8

Inspection
of this table reveals that the elements that have volumetric symmetry all have three
things in common: (1)The number of ג
units it takes to give them volumetric stability is the number of electrons
they possess times 128, the number of ג
units of Deuterium; (2) the percentage of units is exactly the same, 76.19…;
and (3) their total TRUE volume is the cube of
the value of their number of electrons times 108, the number of the TRUE
units of Hydrogen and Deuterium. These three features of the elements that are
symmetric in TRUE units underline the role of ג units and the Neutron in the formation of a stable universe. Inspection
of the table also reveals that the regularity of volumetrically symmetric elements
appears to have gaps in it because there are no elements to fill the 3x108, 4x108,5x108, 9x108, 11x108, and 13x108 positions in the table. But
these gaps can be filled if we expand our definition of the Periodic Table. If
we think of the TRUE units of mass, energy and ג as the primary building blocks of the universe, electrons,
protons and neutrons as the secondary level of building blocks, and molecules
as the tertiary level of building blocks, this table becomes a list of all of
the building blocks of the universe, not just elements.

FILLING IN
THE GAPS

The
first clue to identifying the symmetric entity that fills a given gap in the
sequence of TRUE-unit volumetric symmetry is its location relative to the other
symmetric forms in the table. The compound that fills a given gap can only be
formed from combinations of symmetric atoms and/or compounds that are smaller
than it. For example, the (3x108)3 gap can only be filled by a
compound entity composed of Helium [TRUE volume = (2x108)3] and
Hydrogen or Deuterium [TRUE volume = (1x108)3]. The table below
identifies symmetrical molecular entities that complete the Periodic Table of Building
Blocks.

true-UNIT SYMMETRIC molecular
coMPOUNDS

Compound

ג Units

Total TRUE

Valence

Percent ג Units

TRUE
Volume

Comments

Helium Hydride HeH

384

504

+1

76.2%

(3x108)3

Super acid

Not found in Nature

Lithium
Hydride Li and H2 (Deuterium)

512

672

+2

76.2%

(4x108)3

Rare in Nature

Very Reactive

(He)2H

640

826

+3

76.2%

(5x108)3

Produced in

Nuclear Fusion

HeH3

640

826

+3

76.2%

(5x108)3

Produced in

Nuclear Fusion

Hydroxide

HO

1,174

1,512

-1

77.6%

(9x108)3

Building Block of Amino Acids

H2N

1,174

1,512

-1

77.6%

(9x108)3

Common in Amino Acids

CH3

1,174

1,512

-1

77.6%

(9x108)3

Common in Organic Compounds

H2O

1,324

1,680

0

78.8%

(10x108)3

Water

H4N

1,496

1,848

+1

80.9%

(11x108)3

Ammonium Ion

C2H

1,686

2,184

+3

77.2%

(13x108)3

Major Component of Cysteine Amino Acid

While
filling the gaps in the sequence of (nx108)3 symmetric structures in the Periodic
Table, we find that there may be two or more compounds with the exact TRUE
volume to fill the gaps, increasing in number as n
increases. We also discover that,
after n
= 9, there are symmetric compounds equal in TRUE volume to some elements. H2O,
for example, has a TRUE volume of (10x108)3, the same TRUE volume as
the inert gas Neon. The TRUE-unit analyses for the compounds in the Table
immediately above are displayed below.

Helium Hydride, Valence = - 2 + 3 = +1

Compound

Particles

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

He + H

3e

3

315

318

32,157,432

3P+

51

21

72

373,248

3N0

66

48

114

1,481,544

Totals

120

384

504

34,012,224=(324)3

= (3x108)3

Lithium Hydride, Valence = - 2 + 4 = +2

Atoms

Particles

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

Li + H2

4e

4

420

424

76,225,024

4P+

68

28

96

884,736

4N0

88

64

152

3,511,808

Totals

160

512

672

80,621,568=(432)3

= (4x108)3

(He)2H, Valence = - 2 + 5 = +3

Atoms

Particles

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

(He)2H

5e

5

525

530

148,877,000

5P+

85

35

120

1,728,000

5N0

110

80

190

6,859,000

Totals

186

640

826

157,464,000=(540)3

= (5x108)3

HeH3, Valence = - 2 + 5 = +3

Atoms

Particles

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

(He)2H

5e

5

525

530

148,877,000

5P+

85

35

120

1,728,000

5N0

110

80

190

6,859,000

Totals

186

640

826

157,464,000=(540)3

= (5x108)3

HO, Hydroxide Ion, Valence = - 2 + 9 = +7

Atoms

Particles

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

2H + O

9e

9

945

954

868,250,664

9P+

153

63

216

10,077,696

1Cג+8N0

176

166

342

40,001,688

Totals

338

1,174

1,512

918,330,048=(972)3

=
(9x108)3

H2N, Valence = - 2 + 9 = +7

Atoms

Particles

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

2H+
N

9e

9

945

954

868,250,664

9P+

153

63

216

10,077,696

9N0

176

166

342

40,001,688

Totals

338

1,174

1,512

918,330,048=(972)3

=
(9x108)3

CH3, Valence = - 2 + 9 = +7

Atoms

Particles

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

C + 3H

9e

9

945

954

868,250,664

9P+

153

63

216

10,077,696

9N0

176

166

342

40,001,688

Totals

338

1,174

1,512

918,330,048=(972)3

=
(9x108)3

H2O, Water, Valence = -2 -8 + 10 = 0

Atoms

Particles

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

2(H2)+O*

10e

10

1050

1060

1,191,016,000

10P+

170

70

240

13,824,000

8N0+2Cג

176

204

380

54,872,000

Totals

356

1,324

1,680

1,259,712,000=(1,080)3
=(10x108)3

H4N, Valence = 11 -2 – 8 = +1

Atoms

Particles

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

4H1+ N

11e

11

1,155

1,166

1,585,242,296

11P+

187

77

264

18,399,744

4Cג+7N0

154

264

418

73,034,632

Totals

352

1,496

1,848

1,676,676,672=(1,188)3

=(11x108)3

C2H, Valence = 13 -2 – 8 = +3

Atoms

Particles

Mass/Energy

ג

Total TRUE

Units

Volume

2C + H

13e

13

1,365

1,378

2,616,662,152

13P+

221

91

312

30,371,328

Cג+12N0

264

230

494

120,553,784

Totals

498

1,686

2,184

2,767,587,264=(1,404)3

=(13x108)3

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Applying the process of rotation and
unitary projection from dimension to dimension in Euclidean space, we find that
the mathematical structure of basic number theory requires the existence of
nine finite orthogonal dimensions embedded successively in an infinitely
continuous substrate. Applying the logic of the Calculus of Dimensional
Distinctions, an application and extension of George Spencer Brown’s Laws of
Form, to LHC particle-collider mass/energy data for electrons, protons and
neutrons, considered as spinning distinctions of content occupying unitary
distinctions of extent in the 3S-1t dimensional domain of physical
observations, we find that the light-speed limitation of Einstein’s special
relativity and Planck’s quantization of mass and energy define a minimal
unitary distinction. This minimal mass/energy, space-time distinction is the
smallest possible finite building block of the 3S-1t universe.. As such, it
replaces the infinitesimal of the differential calculus of Newton and Leibniz
in the mathematical analysis of physical reality. The Calculus of Dimensional
Distinctions provides us with the tool needed to extend the work of Minkowski,
Einstein, Kaluza, Klein, Pauli, and others who have attempted to use
multi-dimensional analysis to integrate and explain the laws of physics.

The process of rotation and unitary
orthogonal projection from the planes of one dimension to the next in Euclidean
space utilizes the Pythagorean Theorem. Generalization of the Pythagorean
Theorem equation to three dimensions and application to the minimal quantized
distinctions of extent and content produces a set of Diophantine expressions
that perfectly describe the combination of elementary particles. Integer
solutions of these equations represent stable, symmetric combinations of
elementary particles; but when there are no integer solutions, the expressions
are inequalities representing unstable combinations that decay quickly.
Fermat’s Last Theorem applied to the equation describing the combination of two
elementary particles tells us that there are no integer solutions, and thus no
stable combinations. The equation for the combination of three particles, on
the other hand, does have integer solutions. This explains why three quarks,
not two, combine to form protons and neutrons.

Application of the equation
describing the combination of three particles to particle-collider mass/energy
data expressed as multiples of the minimal unit, reveals that, in order for
stable combinations to form, in addition to the volumetrically equivalent forms
of mass and energy, there has to be a third equivalent form that does not
register in physical measurements as mass or energy. Representing the third
equivalent form with the symbol ψ
in the equations describing the combination of three particles as integer
multiples of the minimal unit, we are able to calculate the unique number of
mass/energy units and gimmel (ג) units needed to produce the stable protons and neutrons of
the atoms that make up the physical universe, i.e., the elements of the Periodic
Table.

Analyzing the new information
provided by the third form of the “stuff” of the physical universe, we find
interesting patterns in the structure of the Elements. For example, Carbon,
Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Sulfur have the exact same percentage of גunits. This
exact ratio in elements that play a major role in life-supporting organisms is
not accidental. Without the presence of ג units, no stable structures
could form and there would be no physical universe. This means that ג TRUE units had to be present from the formation of the
first elementary particle, guiding the formation of the physical universe to
produce structures capable of supporting life. This supports the hypothesis
that logical structure, meaning, purpose and life are not emergent epiphenomena,
but intrinsic features of reality.

TDVP provides a “mechanism”
explaining why there is something rather than nothing. In TDVP, the form and
structure of reality is determined by the intrinsic logic of nine-dimensional
reality, without requiring any transfer of mass or energy.

These results strongly suggest
that, in a nine-dimensional spin reality, stable structures are purposefully
formed for use as vehicles through which the consciousness of the C-substrate
may experience spacetime reality.