Who the hell would support the stinking, whining, parasitical vermin constituting the Occupy Wall Street movement? As Zombie documents (with supporting links) there is a long list of those who do — and it is just as unsavory as you might expect. The list will probably grow, but here’s how it stands now:

The 99%: Official list of Occupy Wall Street’s supporters, sponsors and sympathizers

Note that each and every one of these Friends of the OWS is hostile to America and the American way of life.

Two comparably nefarious supporters of the Occupy infestations are the Democrat Party and the liberal establishment’s “mainstream” media. Maybe those malignant institutions will be added as the original list is updated.

The most asinine Nanny State atrocity that has ever been inflicted on sovereign individuals, it’s all the proof you need that a full-time legislature is a menace to your sanity, and a dire threat to your liberty…

TED

Apparently, not unlike birds of a feather, maggots also flock togather.

762×51

I love a target rich environment. I reduces my workload to position, ranging and windage.

I was explaining to someone just yesterday that OWS is not a grass roots movement. (More like a bowel movement, actually.) I also suggested to this individual that she get away from the fluff TV “news” pieces and do some reading if she wanted to debate me on the subject.

Dr. 9

That’s quite an impressive list, and all with the same goal, the complete destruction of the U.S. as we know it.

Do you know of another nation, including so-called 3rd and 4th-world countries, where the people are so weak and so dumb, that they would allow so many powerful forces in their midst who’s ambition is that nations enslavement while at the same time, feeding, housing, educating, and caring for their health, etc?

America’s doom will come, not at the hands of some nuclear-powered enemy, but from it’s own weakminded people, it’s bizarre immigration policies, and it’s greatly misguided sense of compassion for others. Any wonder why the whole world laughs at us?

Id chip in to have all the OWS degenerates flown to the middle east Moose Limb countries so they can experience the wonderful societies the Moose Limbs have established. Plenty of desert space for them to pitch their tents while waiting for the 12th Imam to return while enjoing the wonderfully enlighenment of the Atab Spring where weekly Gay Pride parades enterain the masses.

GoY

And yet, there are those who claim the appearance of hardcore Marxists at these protests is just some sort of odd anomaly.

The crazy thing is having David Duke and The Black Panthers on there together. It only shows how utterly evil they are.

There is no cause for the black man or the white man or communism or anarchy. They really do not care about the idea that originally formed their groups anymore. It has come to one singular task and that is to take down America and Western society.

I just ask why and the only thing that seems to come to mind for me are answers I have found in the bible.

To which, my response was – so what? Al Qaeda have their own agenda and that has nothing to do with McCain.

AC

To which, my response was – so what? Al Qaeda have their own agenda and that has nothing to do with McCain.

Occupy is the product of the agendas of these groups.

lao’s mangina

HYPERBOLE!! EDITED!!

PAY ATTENTION TO MEEEEE!!!

I’m not getting any traction here, so I’ll post some “McCain did it too!” type-of gotcha link.

SARAH PALIN!! CROSS HAIRS!!

PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO MEEEEEE!!!

Mickey Shea

Dr. 9: to answer your question, I believe only Great Britain is nuttier than we are in that respect.

.308

762×51 says:
November 1, 2011 at 9:27a.m. I love a target rich environment. I reduces my workload to position, ranging and windage.
===========================

Having a Spotter would be good, though.

StanInTexas

And most Conservatives were against McCain as well, LaoZee.

And an endorsement has EVERYTHING to do with a candidate, you idiot!

FrankW

Where is the mantra of lao to proclaim to the world that ows never sought these endorsements? Also to cite duke being a republican?
For what it is worth (IMHO quite a bit) some of these endorsements were material in nature, not just empty cheering. Cash, supplies, etc. That the donations associated with the endorsements were not rejected does indicate acceptance of the endorsement.

lao

Nice try AC.

When David Duke announces he’s a Republican are they a product of his agenda?

How is the Black Panther agenda in synch with the KKK agenda?

lao

stanwee, you ARE stupid. An endorsement is meaningless unless the candidate embraces the endorsement.

See, for example, Romney accepting the endorsement of Christie.

AC

David Duke is not the driving ideological force behind the Republican Party.

On the other hand, this coalition is the driving ideological force behind the foul smelling Marxist infestations in parks across the US.

lao’s mangina

EDITED!! MCCAIN!!

I’m getting so desperate, that I’m posting two in a row now; maybe an irrelevant link will help…

You see, gaining the endorsement of dozens of radical organizations in no way at all indicates that those radical organizations agree with the goals, objectives, and tactics of the OWS. Why, radical organizations are always endorsing groups that are fundamentally at odds with their objectives.

lao

AC, David Duke is, according to you, part of the “driving ideological force” behind O.W.S.

But David Duke is, according to you, NOT part of the “driving ideological force” behind the Republicans.

Do try to explain how that works.

My own explanation is that David Duke’s support of O.W.S. AND the Republicans, has nothing to do with either of them.

son of a preacher man

translation: You can’t make any causality arguments to refute my observations b/c I reject your reality and insert my own.

StanInTexas

LoaZee, you are DESPARATE to make a point, yet you fail again.

Organizations endorse candidates that are idealogically similar to themselves. They endorse candidates that will benefit them politically, economically, etc.

These endorsements speak much about the OWS idiots, and your refusal to accept the reality of the situation speaks much about your bankruptcy of character.

stanwee sez: “Organizations endorse candidates that are idealogically (sic) similar to themselves.”

Yes, and if the candidate agrees with the endorsee, he accepts it.

Which in the above list have O.W.S. accepted?

Do explain how the Black Panthers and KKK are ideologically similar.

Do explain how the nazis and communists are ideologically similar.

Do explain how David Duke and Hugo Chavez are ideologically similar.

Do explain how the Revolutionary Guards of Iran and U.S. Border Guards are ideologically similar.

Do explain how Joe Biden and the Government of North Korea are ideologically similar.

GoY

David Duke has always been an opportunist. He latched onto the GOP to get access to its fundraising apparatus. After the GOP repudiated him, he was able to continue raising funds as a martyr for racists. It’s easy to see why he attaches himself to OWS; it’s a willing audience for the anti-semitism that is his current meal-ticket. Duke is a self-aggrandizing parasite who will latch on to anything that will get him money; plastic surgery addiction isn’t cheap.

I have to wonder why all of those other radical left organizations are endorsing the OWS if, as their defenders proclaim, the OWS is not about promoting a radical left agenda. Those organizations want to advance their agendas, and they have latched onto OWS as a vehicle for those agendas. That’s quite a different breed of opportunism than Mr. Duke’s, one which requires ideological cohesion.

GoY

The one thing that draws all of those individuals and organizations into common cause with OWS is a hatred of American values and free market capitalism; and a desire to create a new order without those elements.

StanInTexas

LaoZee, it does not matter IN THE LEAST if a candidate accepts the endorsement. All that matters is that the organization thinks that their positions and candidate’s positions are similar enough to offer the endorsement.

If CAIR thinks that Obama’s positions are close enough to theit own, they endorse Obama. If Obama’s positions do not support CAIR’s agenda, they don’t endorse Obama. It has NOTHING to do with Obama accepting the endorsement.

The same thing works in the case of OWS. Trying to draw comparisions between the groups endorsing OWS is mental masterbation, which is all you have to offer.

Because of its professed “no leaders” structure, and its’ “open mic” policy for allowing anyone to speak, O.W.S. is prime territory for any group that wants to spread their message. Anybody can talk, but it doesn’t mean their ideas are universally endorsed or accepted.

That point was made clear by the earlier thread that noted a self-described Marxist who addressed 50 people while the majority in attendance ignored him.

Yardsale says: Those organizations want to advance their agendas, and they have latched onto OWS as a vehicle for those agendas.

That part of your statement I agree with.

StanInTexas

LaoZee, your “no leader” lie has already been put to rest. Continuing to repeat it only shows how truly pathetic you are.

Winston Smith

Lao-zer.

Black Panthers and the KKK are both racist groups – 2 sides of the same coin. Nuff said about them.

Nazis and Communists are both Socialists. Nazi’s being National Socialists where 1 party runs everything. Communists are also socialists featuring one party rule. Both promote national healthcare, government control and onwership of all key means of productioon. Both dispose of opposition and undesirables in prison/death labor camps/gulags. Both have an iron grip on the media – any viewpoint that run counter to the leaderships and results in shutdown, prison or disposal. The only reason Hitler hated the Soviets was he thought they were mostly Jewish Bolsheviks.

In the early days of communists revolutions many fringe groups are accepted as useful idiots. After the revolution, any undeseribables are disposed of in various purges to purify the The Party.

David Duke is a National White Socialist. Hugo Chavez is a National Hispanic Socialist. The differences are one of race, little else.

As for the OWS / Islamofascists /Socialists/Communist/Nazis/ect, while many have different goals they are united in one purpose – Destroy America as a Constitutional Republic and remove it as a world power.

Recall how Hitler and the Soviets signed a non aggression pact then Hitler turned on this Soviet allies in the end. The same would have happened if the Soviet Union had fallen to Hitler where the alliance with the Empire of Japan was concered. In time Hitler would have gotten nukes and used them against Japan making a near Global Nazi Empire a realistic goal. The US likely would have remained in control of the Americas until the 3rd Reich thought it could defeat it making a Nazi run Earth a real reality.

lao

Oh really? Who is the O.W.S. leader? Can you link to a picture?

StanInTexas

I already did, the very first time you asked for a leader. You then disparaged the website, and the link, and probably my spelling before you ran away.

lao

“both racist groups”…too funny. ‘Nuff said that you don’t want to explore the notion that they might be racist against each other.

GoY

That said, I don’t think Joe Biden hates the American free market system with the passion of, say, the CPUSA or the Klan. I think Joe, like many Democrats, bought into the propaganda that the OWS was the left wing’s response to the Tea Party. So, he opportunistically attached himself to it. He’s not much different than David Duke in that respect.

It would be supremely simple-minded to assume all of the groups and individuals who’ve latched onto OWS have done so for the same reason; just as it would be dishonest and asinine to pretend that groups like the CPUSA, the World Workers Party, and the American National Socialist Party don’t see something in the movement that they can ideologically relate to.

In summary, the reason all these groups with different ideologies support OWS is the old sayiing “The enemy of your enemy is your friend” – until the enemy is defeated then the friends become enemies.

A good example of this was the US/Allied-Soviet alliance of WW II – once the Axis powers were defeated these “friends” and allies became enemies.

Winston Smith

Lao-Mao. Being racist against each other?

Again – the enemy of your enemy is your friend. Until the enemy is defeated that is.

You apparently are too too retarded to understand the concept.

FrankW

I love this.
If there are no “leaders” evidently a group is incapable of having been endorsed (according to lao), and therefore no “birds of a feather” argument can be applied to them.
The ows have accepted donations from a variety of sources, so who is cashing the checks, the leaders maybe? The point is ows is a front for the dems, (kinda an early October surprise if you would). I am willing to bet at some point something attention grabbing happens at ows (so far they are just a bad joke), during the distraction this provides bammy will do a document dump (probably Solyndra (or related) or maybe Fast & Furious. There is a dem precedent for this, anybody remember when Clinton bombed someone the day of key testimony in the Lewisnky affair?

lao

In other words, those groups have latched on to O.W.S. for personal, opportunistic reasons.

GoY

Only an idiot would assume that the motivation of political groups are identical to those of individuals. Fortunately, we have such an idiot; with a complete lack of reading comprehension skills.

StanInTexas

You’re right, LaoZee, it IS pointless.

Because I have already provide you the link, which you blew off. You pull this crap all the time of demanding we provide you proof, then ignoring what we gave you.

You lied, you continue to lie.

lao

I understand this statement of yours quite well Yardsale:

Those organizations want to advance their agendas, and they have latched onto OWS as a vehicle for those agendas.

I agree completely. Organizations or individuals, they all want to advance their own agenda.

lao

Well stanwee, you could simply provide the “proof” and then see how I respond.

A photo of the O.W.S. “leader” would be nice.

Ghost of FA Hayak

lao says:

In other words, those groups have latched on to O.W.S. for personal, opportunistic reasons.
What a coincidence
So have Obama and the Democrapts
Easy does it with that tightrope, Lao

LaoZee, I know how you responded the last time I provided you proof. You know as well, but are trying to play games here.

son of a preacher man

their agendas all seem to be about the same: A bunch of ideologue reactionaries looking for confirmation and acceptance with in each other for their smash and grap approach of getting thru life. The rest is just rhetorical window dressing to dupe the un-informed.

Lao’ s Lonely Syphilitic Brain Cell

Somebody is trying to copyright the OWS name to sell t-shirts, mugs and other paraphenalia. Capitalism is only evil if someone else is making the money.

I love a target rich environment. I reduces my workload to position, ranging and windage.

Dude, I heard from a trusted source that there is a sparp wind shear that funnled through the buildings.
I think you should go should go to a 180 gr. wt should suffice For that rifle. Nice thing is there will not be any accurate return fire. Kinda like shootin zombies the rest will just, Bitch and Moan. Everyone knows Hippies can`t fight or shoot. or hold a job to buy any quality weapons.

lao’s automated rant generator

At first, when lao saw this post, he creamed his pants because of the sheer number of links. The he sh*t his pants when he realized that all the links were too overwhelming of a case against him.