We’ll come complete with some entertaining show pieces, including a geiger counter and various ‘radioactive’ samples – it should make for a highly entertaining and informative afternoon!

More details:

Mayor Heather Wright (Town of Walkerville) invites you to take part in a public conversation on the pro-nuclear power debate. Four scientific professionals and commentators offer four perspectives on a subject that still divides public opinion. Whether you are ‘for’ ‘against’ or ‘undecided’, this is your chance to hear why all these experts agree that nuclear power is not only the safest energy source but also the one with the lowest environmental footprint.

I give you my best wishes and know you will do an excellent job. It serves well to remember that most people have a basic flaw which is only human. They like to believe they are superior at least to some others. This one flaw may be the downfall of our current civilization. The inability to win over the anti nuclear crowd is a clear example of this flaw. Being right is more important than doing right. And I have also witnessed that science has become to many scientists their own type of religion. The way to reach others is to avoid appearing arrogant or somehow full of oneself. If you already know this let it be a reminder and share it so that the message we want to communicate reaches people.

I hope you get a good audience but expect plenty of heckling from the anti-nuclear body keen to preach about the catastrophe in Fukushima. I also hope Mayor Heather Wright isn’t a relative of Matthew. :) – I look forward to hearing the feedback.

They will probably try to disrupt the event, though most of them are fairly passive folk, I can’t account for those I don’t know.

I posted this to the facebook event page, but the event creator keeps deleting my posts:

__________________

Your statement in the descriptor is misleading:

“you are invited to attend a traditional NeoHippie response to the voodoo science behind plans for a nuclear reactor in Walkerville.”

No one’s actually planning to build a nuclear reactor in Walkerville.

And Barry Barry W. Brook is no a “rabid advocate of uranium mining and nuclear power”. You’re misrepresenting him and clearly haven’t been reading his blog http://bravenewclimate.com – Brook is markedly pro “what works” and his definition of what works is based on real world figures from countries already running high renewable percentages and high nuclear percentages of electricity production. Brook’s general approach is renewables where it makes sense to do so, and Gen III & Gen IV nuclear power to provide quality base-line electricity supply.

Gen IV nuclear power is capable of ‘burning’ the current stock piles of nuclear waste and producing a spent fuel that is less radioactive than the ground your sitting on in 300 – 400 years. There are buildings in Europe that have been occupied on a continual basis for longer than that.

To say nuclear power is unsafe because of the Chernobyl, Three Mile Island accidents is like saying air travel in unsafe because of the Hindenburg disaster: they were all old technology plants that aren’t built any more.

I used to be a rabid anti-nuke, until I started doing my own research. Japan and France have been running a lot of nuclear reactors for a good couple decades, mostly incident free.

Read the data, read the published articles, and stop misrepresenting people.

The unavoidable fact remains: If Greenpeace and FoE had got out of the way 30 – 40 years ago, the whole world would be using more nuclear power, like France and Japan have been, and we wouldn’t be in this climate mess we’re in right now.