nmm 22 4500ICPSR27868MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27868MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY), 1998-2004 -- Restricted Use Files
[electronic resource]
Susan David
,
Robert Hornik
,
David Maklan
2011-03-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27868NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY) is a survey conducted to evaluate the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign (Campaign). It focuses on the measurement of the outcomes and impact of Phase III of the Campaign on children and their parents concerning illegal drug use among youth. It contains four rounds of Restricted Use Files and includes all NSPY respondents. The Restricted Use Files also contain extensive data on youth, parents, and the Campaign advertisements, as well as other reference files. In addition, NSPY contains Public Use Files which were released in September 2004. The Public Use Files contain only the first three rounds of data and a subsample of respondents. Also, due to confidentiality reasons, the September 2004 Public Use File provides a limited set of variables about youth, and only a handful of variables about parents as it is not possible to link respondents across rounds using the Public Use Files, but it is possible using the Restricted Use Files. The survey was developed and implemented under contract to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Westat conducted the study in collaboration with the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania and, for the first two years of the project, with the National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. (NDRI).
NSPY Round 1 was conducted in three waves, covering the periods November 1999 through May 2000 (Wave 1), July 2000 through December 2000 (Wave 2), and January 2001 through June 2001 (Wave 3). NSPY Round 2, the first follow-up of the initial survey, was conducted in two waves covering the periods July 2001 through December 2001 (Wave 4) and January 2002 through June 2002 (Wave 5). NSPY Round 3, the second follow-up data collection, was conducted in two waves covering the periods July 2002 through December 2002 (Wave 6) and January 2003 through June 2003 (Wave 7). Finally, NSPY Round 4, the third follow-up data
collection, was conducted in two waves covering the periods July 2003 through December 2003 (Wave 8) and January 2004 through June 2004 (Wave 9). Youths and their parents were selected for NSPY through a multistage, dual frame
probability sample design. The sample was selected in a manner designed to provide an efficient and representative cross-section of American youth. In general, youths living in all types of residential housing units were eligible for the study; however, youths living in institutions, group homes, or dormitories were excluded.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27868.v2
adolescentsicpsrdetoxificationicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug useicpsrfamiliesicpsrhouseholdsicpsrmedia influenceicpsrnews mediaicpsrparentsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDavid, SusanHornik, RobertMaklan, DavidInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27868Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27868.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34263MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34263MiAaIMiAaI
Oregon Youth Substance Use Project (OYSUP), 1998-2010
[electronic resource]
Judy Andrews
2014-03-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34263NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Oregon Youth Substance Use Project (OYSUP) began in 1998, with the recruitment of 1,075 first through fifth graders within a single school district in a working class community in western Oregon. OYSUP is an extensive etiological study that provides a multi-method annual assessment of etiological factors from a variety of contextual (including family, peer, neighborhood and school) and individual (personality, biological influences) domains, predictive of children's cognitions regarding substance use, their own substance use and their at-risk sexual behaviors (beginning in middle school). This unique study follows a representative sample of youth with approximately annual assessments from early childhood, through adolescence, and into emerging adulthood (at age 20-22). The primary objective of the original project and its renewals is to identify risk and protective factors predictive of or comorbid with the development of substance use and at-risk sexual behaviors.
Quantitative survey data was collected from each respondent from 1998 to 2010. Within the aims of the original OYSUP study and the two subsequent renewals (one of which is ongoing), participants and their parents were followed annually until they were one-year post-high school, with an additional intensive assessment at age 20-22. In each year, the target participant and their parents completed assessments. The intensive assessment at age 20-22 included a diagnostic interview with the target participants and an assessment of cortisol reactivity in response to acute stress. During the school years, teachers completed assessments assessing their student's behavior, and school records for most students were obtained each year. In addition, principals in elementary schools completed school climate assessments and census data is used to obtain measures of neighborhood climate. Finally, respondents' demographic information was also collected.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34263.v2
alcohol consumptionicpsrbiomeasuresicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug useicpsreducatorsicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrmental healthicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparentsicpsrrisk factorsicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial environmenticpsrstudent attitudesicpsrstudent behavioricpsrstudent evaluationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtobacco useicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramAndrews, JudyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34263Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34263.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34312MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34312MiAaIMiAaI
Maternal Lifestyle Study in Four Sites in the United States, 1993-2011
[electronic resource]
Barry Lester
,
Henrietta Bada
,
Charles Bauer
,
Seetha Shankaran
,
Toni Whitaker
,
Linda LaGasse
,
Jane Hammond
2014-05-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34312NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
ental outcomes. Phase III followed children at 4, 4.5, 5, 6, and 7 years. In addition to outcomes examined in Phase II, school performance and neurodevelopmental measures of emotional and behavioral self-regulation were also examined. Phase IV covers ages 8, 9, 10, and 11 years of age. Outcomes in this phase were further expanded to include antisocial behavior, onset of substance use, psychopathology, and neuroendocrine function. Phase V assessed children at ages 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 years of age. The fifth phase of the study has a significant emphasis on psychopathology, school performance, peer relationships, substance use onset and risk taking behaviors, including risky sexual behaviors.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34312.v2
alcoholicpsrbirthicpsrchild developmenticpsrcocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug useicpsrmental healthicpsrmothersicpsrphysical conditionicpsrpregnancyicpsrrespiratory diseasesicpsrrisk factorsicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial environmenticpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramLester, BarryBada, HenriettaBauer, CharlesShankaran, SeethaWhitaker, ToniLaGasse, LindaHammond, JaneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34312Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34312.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34488MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34488MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Release Measures, 2000-2010 [Restricted]
Edward P. Mulvey
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34488NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
The Release data portion of the Pathways study contains information from 1,130 interviews ("release interviews") reflecting the youths' perceptions regarding various aspects of the residential experience and institutional environment (e.g., accounts of program operations and services provided, ratings regarding the participant's feelings of his or her safety in the facility). The release interview was conducted within 30 days prior to or after release from a facility and in a separate session apart from the time point interview. This was done to minimize the burden on the research participant and to ensure adequate attention to institutional ratings. The restricted time period within which to conduct the release interview reduced the likelihood that intervening events and experiences would skew the participant's recall of the stay.
Study participants could contribute more than one release interview, depending upon the number of institutional placements he/she had over the seven-year follow-up period. The current release data reflects ratings from 686 unique individuals. It should be recognized that not every institutional stay for every youth produced a release interview. On the basis of the number of reported institutional stays in the sample, it is estimated that a release interview was obtained for approximately 54 percent of the total number of residential stays experienced by study participants. Release interviews were missed if the research interviewer was not aware of the institutional stay (e.g. it occurred between time point interviews) or if the interviewer only became aware of the institutional stay at a point that was too late to schedule a release interview within the required window surrounding the release date.
The 686 individuals reflected in the release data represent 51 percent of the Pathway study participants (n=1,354) and 56 percent of Pathways participants who had a least one institutional stay (n=1,234; 120 Pathways youths had no institutional stays). On average, these 686 youths had 1.6 interviews. The number of interviews per unique person ranges from one to eight.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34488.v2
academic achievementicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrfriendshipsicpsrgangsicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrmedicationsicpsrreligionicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment facilitiesicpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrvocational educationicpsrHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34488Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34488.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34605MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34605MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Official Arrest Records, 2000-2010 [Restricted]
Edward P. Mulvey
2014-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34605NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654), and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
The official arrests records of all 1,354 youth were obtained from multiple sources. For arrest/petitions under the age of 18, this information is based on petitions appearing in the juvenile and adult court records in each site. In Philadelphia, this information was gathered based on a hand review of juvenile and adult court documents; in Phoenix, the information is based on reports from two computerized court tracking systems (JOLTS--Juvenile On-Line Tracking System for juvenile court information, ICIS--Maricopa County Superior Court database for adult court information). For arrests/petitions over 18, FBI arrest records are the source of information. There is no self-reported information contained in this set of data.
Information from these different data sources is consolidated into the following categories:
Information regarding petitions with a date that falls prior to the baseline interview date ("prior petitions").
Information regarding the study index petition (also called the "initial referring petition"; this is the adjudication that prompted study enrollment). Information regarding the study index petition can be found by accessing the "type" variable associated with the prior petitions (specific variable name: Official Record Prior PetitionXX: Petition type). Depending on the investigator's needs, this petition can remain combined with the "priors" or be used as a stand-alone petition.
Information regarding arrests and court petitions with a date which falls after the baseline interview date in the Pathways study ("rearrests").
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v2
arrest recordsicpsrfelony offensesicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrmisdemeanor offensesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrsex offensesicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrweapons offensesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34605Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32282MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32282MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Calendar Data, 2000-2010 [Restricted]
Edward P. Mulvey
2014-11-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR32282NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Calendar data files are comprised of 47 total parts spread across 13 distinct topical domains.
Academic Achievement
Antisocial Activity
Community-Based Services
Contact With the Justice System
Court Monitoring
Gainful Activity
Head Injury
Living Situation
Making and Spending Money
Medication
Out of Community Placement
Romance
School
Each topical domain contains multiple reference periods for looking at the topic across the entire data collection period of the study.
Users who request these restricted data should first review the documentation available from NAHDAP (user guide and frequency codebooks) and from the Pathways Website (domain content codebooks). This review will help determine which specific datasets will be needed for your project. The "Research Description" in ICPSR's Data Access Request System (IDARS) must include a specific explanation of why you need each topic domain selected on the "Data Selection" page in IDARS. Most projects should only require one reference period per topic domain being requested. Data requests for all reference periods within a given domain will not be approved without a satisfactory explanation of why all of the reference periods are required for your project. Since the Calendar data collection is very extensive and Restricted Data Use Agreements are only for 2 years, data requests are not expected to need the entire Calendar data collection.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
Respondents were enrolled and baseline interviews conducted from November 2000 to January 2003. Follow-up interviews were then scheduled with the respondents at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 84 months past their baseline interview.
The enrolled youth were at least 14 years old and under 18 years old at the time of their committing offense and were found guilty of a serious offense (predominantly felonies, with a few exceptions for some misdemeanor property offenses, sexual assault, or weapons offenses).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32282.v2
academic achievementicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsremploymenticpsrfamily lifeicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrinjuriesicpsrinterpersonal relationsicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrmedicationsicpsrpersonal adjustmenticpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrpsychosocial assessmenticpsrreligionicpsrservice providersicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsubstance abuseicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32282Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32282.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32603MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32603MiAaIMiAaI
Northwestern Juvenile Project (Cook County, IL)
[electronic resource]Baseline, 1995-1998 [Restricted]
Linda A. Teplin
2013-08-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR32603NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Established in 1995, the Northwestern Juvenile Project assessed alcohol, drug, or mental (ADM) service needs of juvenile detainees. The study took place between the years of 1995 and 1998, sampling 1,829 male and female juvenile detainees within Cook County, Illinois. This study had two specific aims:
To assess the juvenile detainees ADM service needs (including psychiatric disorder, comorbidity and functional impairment); and,
To determine the extent that juvenile detainees who need ADM services received them while in the custody of the criminal justice system.
This study has four methodological advantages over prior research:
Stratified random sampling;
Sufficiently large N (approximately 600 females and 1200 males);
Reliable instruments; and
Comorbidity data.
Questions for respondents generally pertain to demographics, medical and sexual history, criminal history, aptitude and mental health assessment, familial and social relations, drug abuse, and education.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32603.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrbehavior problemsicpsrchild abuseicpsrcognitive functioningicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrHIVicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrmental disordersicpsrpost-traumatic stress disordericpsrrisk factorsicpsrICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemTeplin, Linda A.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32603Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32603.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33444MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33444MiAaIMiAaI
Center for Education and Drug Abuse Research (CEDAR)
[electronic resource]Etiological and Prospective Family Study in Southwestern Pennsylvania, Baseline Data, 1990-2011
Ralph E. Tarter
2012-08-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33444NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Center for Education and Drug Abuse Research (CEDAR) conducts research on 775 families enrolled in the Center's prospective investigations into the etiology of substance use disorder (SUD). The pro-bands are men with lifetime presence/absence of SUD consequent to use of an illicit drug who have a 10-12 year old biological son or daughter. The biological children of SUD men are assigned to the high average risk (HAR) group whereas offspring of men without SUD, having neither axis 1 disorder ("normal") nor SUD psychiatric disorder, are assigned to the low average risk (LAR) group. A second control group (Psych control) was also collected, in whom the fathers had a lifetime DSM-III-R diagnosis of any psychiatric disorder not related to substance use. The sample sizes are as follows: HAR = 344, LAR = 350, and Psych = 81. The children are currently in varying stages of follow-up evaluation conducted at ages 12-14, 16, 19, and annually thereafter until age 30. CEDAR has already shown that they can predict in 10-12 year old youth cannabis use disorder by age 22 with approximately 70 percent accuracy, thereby substantiating the paradigm, subject recruitment strategy, and measurement protocols. Multidisciplinary research is conducted on family members (father, mother, children) with the objective of elucidating the genetic, bio-behavioral, and environmental factors on development of SUD consequent to use of illegal drugs. Research protocols are organized into three thematically connected research modules (Neurogenetics, Developmental Psychopathology, and Translation) linking etiology and prevention.
The research components thus align with the NIH Roadmap model such that basic science informs clinical research leading to prevention guided by an understanding of etiology.
In addition to module-level research, faculty also participate in three organizational aims: (1) Devise a practical scale to quantify the transmissible liability to SUD; (2) Empirically test a bio-psychological theory of SUD etiology focusing on off-time maturation leading to psychological dysregulation predisposing to SUD; and, (3) Delineate SUD liability variants within an ontogenetic framework.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33444.v1
aptitudeicpsrattitudesicpsrchild healthicpsrchildrenicpsrcognitionicpsrcognitive functioningicpsrdomestic relationsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily relationsicpsrhealthicpsrmental healthicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparentsicpsrparticipationicpsrpersonality assessmenticpsrpsychiatric servicesicpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrpsychosocial assessmenticpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial lifeicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityTarter, Ralph E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33444Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33444.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28921MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28921MiAaIMiAaI
Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation [Restricted Use]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
2014-03-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR28921NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation was conducted to evaluate the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP)'s SPF SIG initiative, which sought to: (1) prevent the onset and reduce the progression of substance abuse, including childhood and underage drinking; (2) reduce substance abuse-related problems in communities; and (3) build prevention capacity and infrastructure at the state and community levels. This cross-site evaluation included the 21 states and territories CSAP funded in FY2004 (Cohort 1) and an additional 5 States funded in Cohort 2 in FY2005 that were funded for up to 5 years to implement the SPF. The SPF is a five-step prevention planning model that requires states to: (1) conduct a statewide needs assessment, including the establishment of a State Epidemiological and Outcomes Workgroup (SEOW); (2) mobilize and build state and community capacity to address needs; (3) develop a statewide strategic plan for prevention; (4) implement evidence-based prevention, policies, and practices (EBPPP) to meet state and community needs; and (5) monitor and evaluate the implementation of their SPF SIG project.
Under contract to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) with funding provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Westat, in collaboration with the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE) and The MayaTech Corporation, implemented a multilevel, multi-method quasi-experimental design to evaluate SPF SIG's impact. The scope of the evaluation encompassed national, state, and community levels. The design included comparison conditions at both the state and community levels.
These data represent Phase I of the restricted use data release and contains extensive data on state-level implementation, community-level implementation, and state-level infrastructure, as well as other reference elements. A subsequent release (Phase II) will include state- and community-level outcomes, as well as data on community-level implementation, community-level implementation fidelity, state-level sustainability, and mediating variables.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28921.v2
alcohol abuseicpsrclient characteristicsicpsrcollege studentsicpsrcommunity participationicpsrcommunity healthicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcommunity service programsicpsrcontinuing educationicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrhealth policyicpsrhuman servicesicpsrilligal drugsicpsrinterventionicpsrjuvenilesicpsrlabor forceicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrliquor law violationsicpsrmiddle schoolicpsrNative Americansicpsrneeds assessmenticpsrorganizational structureicpsroutcome evaluationicpsroutreach programsicpsrparentsicpsrplanningicpsrpolicies and proceduresicpsrpregnancyicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrpublic healthicpsrraceicpsrrisk factorsicpsrschoolsicpsrskill developmenticpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtrainingicpsrtreatment programsicpsryoung adultsicpsrzip code areasicpsrAfrican AmericansicpsrcountiesicpsrcrimeicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Substance Abuse PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28921Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28921.v2