Justice Minister David Ford and Northern Ireland’s most senior coroner John Leckey

By Barry McCaffrey

Northern Ireland’s most senior coroner has launched an unprecedented attack on the failure of the British government and Department of Justice to properly resource investigations into the killing of nine men in Co Armagh 30 years ago.

The Detail has obtained a copy of a letter from Senior Coroner John Leckey’s office to Justice Minister David Ford which claims that inquests into the IRA killing of three policemen and subsequent RUC shooting of six men in Co Armagh in 1982 is being “funded on a drip feed basis” with “no demonstrable commitment” to ensure that they are properly resourced.

While the coroner’s criticism in this instance specifically relates to the so-called ‘Shoot to Kill’ inquests, the issues raised in the letter are understood to impact on a wide range of other controversial Troubles related killings.

In what is being seen as the most serious judicial criticism of government resourcing for inquests into controversial killings, the senior coroner’s office states:

• It should be viewed as an “enormous source of embarrassment to the state that these inquests have not been held”.

• The PSNI’s attitude to disclosing sensitive material to inquests is “driving up costs”.

• The senior coroner is “deeply frustrated” that, despite making a request three years ago, his office has yet to be provided with its own expert investigator to assist with cases.

• Mr Leckey warns that if the European Court of Human Rights imposes sanctions for continued delays in holding inquests he will not allow the coroner’s office to be blamed.

Justice Minister David Ford defended the resources allocated to the ‘Shoot to Kill’ inquests stating that his department is committed to meeting its obligations to properly resource inquests in an “efficient and cost effective” way.

HISTORY OF DELAYS IN INQUESTS

There have been repeated delays into the holding of inquests into the IRA killing of three policemen and subsequent RUC shooting of six men in Co Armagh in 1982.

RUC men Sean Quinn, Alan McCloy and Paul Hamilton were killed by an IRA landmine near Lurgan in October 1982.

Within weeks Gervaise McKerr, Sean Burns, Eugene Toman, Seamus Grew, Roddy Carroll and 17 year-old Michael Tighe were shot dead by the RUC’s Special Support Unit (SSU) in a series of controversial shootings in Co Armagh during a three week period.

All but Michael Tighe were members of republican paramilitary organisations; however none were armed at the time they were shot.

A key part of evidence in the ‘Shoot to Kill’ inquests relate to a report by then Greater Manchester Deputy Chief Constable John Stalker, who was called in to investigate the killings in 1984.

Mr Stalker’s report has never been made public after he was dramatically removed from the investigation in June 1986, shortly before it was due to be published.

The senior coroner had hoped to open inquests into the so-called ‘Shoot To Kill’ deaths in April 2013, but protracted delays in the PSNI disclosing sensitive materials has led to the full proceedings being delayed indefinitely.

The families of those involved have claimed that the continued delays are aimed at frustrating public hearings into the shootings.

But the PSNI and Security Services insist that there are issues of national security contained in the documents which have to be properly scrutinised to ensure that sensitive intelligence is not improperly placed in the public domain.

In what is being seen as the most severe criticism of the continued delays into the ‘Shoot to Kill’ inquests, the Senior Coroner’s Office wrote to Justice Minister on May 06 stating that Mr Leckey had “done his best to cajole and persuade” the PSNI and Court Service to provide adequate funding, personnel and practical arrangements for hearings.

The letter, written by the Coroner’s Office solicitor highlights a “not inconsiderable amount of frustration on the part of the Senior Coroner”.

It states: “He has been endeavouring to hold these inquests for many years. It should be viewed as an enormous source of embarrassment to the state that these inquests have not been held.”

Expressing concerns over the failure to allocate proper resources to allow the inquests to take place, the letter states:

“The Senior Coroner is of the view that the inquests are being funded on a drip feed basis and that there is no demonstrable commitment to ensure that these inquests are properly resourced and otherwise facilitated so that they can take place timeously.”

Describing the impact which the delays has on the families of those killed, it stated:

“The families of the deceased and the witnesses age, and many have already died without these inquests having been heard. The delay for the families of the deceased and for many of the witnesses involved must be nothing short of intolerable.

“Neither is the public interest, more broadly, served by the state of affairs which has been allowed to pertain.”

The letter states that the lack of resources afforded to the inquests was “wholly unsatisfactory” and is preventing the Coroner’s Office from properly planning the logistics needed to hold hearings.

PSNIATTITUDE TO DISCLOSURE ‘DRIVING UP COSTS’

The senior coroner expressed concern over the financial costs which are being accrued as a result of the PSNI’s inability to meet agreed deadlines for the disclosure of sensitive material to the court.

The letter said: “In the context of the efficient use of budgetary resources, the present attitude of the PSNI to the classification of the Stalker/Sampson material is only serving to drive up costs, not reduce them. This problem has been longstanding, and has been raised with PSNI, who advise they can declassify no faster than the disclosure exercise allows.”

In 2011 Mr Leckey had requested funding for the use of an expert investigator to independently assist the Coroner’s Office during the inquest hearings.

However three years on the letter states that Mr Leckey “remains deeply frustrated” by the absence of an appointed Investigator.

“It is essential that this role is filled as early as possible… there is no scope for any argument over budgetary constraints.

“The Senior Coroner has been actively seeking the appointment of an Investigator for going on three years … This Office has indicated the need for such an appointment for several years now and resources should have been in place to allow me to move directly to this appointment at the point it was required.

“Instead, the process currently embarked upon is highly bureaucratic and overly attenuated, with the practical effect being that we are still some considerable (time) away from a substantive appointment – with a lack of clarity still hanging over the appropriate method to be deployed for the appointment process itself. This situation is clearly untenable, and meanwhile, valuable time is being wasted and evidence likely deteriorating further.”

CORONER’S OFFICEWONTTAKEBLAME IN EUROPE

In recent years the Department of Justice and Northern Ireland Office has publicly expressed concerns over the financial cost of investigating the past and the need to monitor budgets.

However the Senior Coroner has warned DoJ and the NIO that concerns over the financing of inquests cannot be allowed to delay judicial hearings into the deaths.

And Mr Leckey warns that he will not allow his office to be blamed if the government faces further sanctions and criticisms from the European Court of Human Rights as a result of continued delays.

“You have raised budgetary issues and value for money issues and it is appreciated that money is not plentiful currently. …. It is not a task that can be avoided because there is no or insufficient money. Nor can judicial directions in terms of ensuring compliance with this obligation be deemed subject to a business case to the point of becoming lost in a mess of bureaucratic wrangling. Money has to be prioritised to the completion of these inquests. Otherwise, the further sanction of the European Court of Human Rights awaits.

“The Senior Coroner is determined to ensure that if an enquiry into the conduct of those responsible for the discharge of the State’s obligation occurs, there can be no doubt that he has set out continuously his dissatisfaction over the resourcing and other issues which have prevented such Inquests occurring before now.”

Responding to the criticisms from the Senior Coroner, a spokesman for Justice Minister David Ford said:

“I remain committed to ensuring the Article 2 investigation model is supported to deliver legacy inquests in an efficient and cost-effective way. I have commissioned an internal review to identify how resources can be more effectively allocated within the current Article 2 complaint investigation framework. The action plan that has been submitted in response to adverse European Court of Human Rights judgments includes measures that have been positively received.”