Latest Video and Audio

Oram, South Africa and the curseWorld Cup Vignettes: A middle-order collapse saw them exit the World Cup, but some inappropriate on-field behaviour by the New Zealanders took its share of the spotlight
()

Oram, South Africa and the curseWorld Cup Vignettes: A middle-order collapse saw them exit the World Cup, but some inappropriate on-field behaviour by the New Zealanders took its share of the spotlight
()

Dhoni takes India homeWorld Cup Vignettes: The most memorable shot of MS Dhoni's career came on the biggest platform: a six to win the World Cup, India's second title
()

Yuvi steers India clearWorld Cup Vignettes: The man of the tournament, Yuvraj Singh, produced his most crucial innings against Australia in the quarter-final
()

Lasith Malinga and Muttiah Muralitharan came in to the World Cup final with 27 wickets between them in the tournament. They were expected to lead Sri Lanka's attack on Saturday, but Murali went wicketless and Malinga couldn't build on his first spell of 2 for 11 in four overs.

Malinga got the early wickets of Virender Sehwag and Sachin Tendulkar, but failed to give Sri Lanka a breakthrough in the middle overs, as he so often does with the old ball. When he came on in the end, with India closing in on a win, he bowled one over for three runs, but his next went for 11, relieving the pressure on India's batsmen. Malinga suggested the dew may have affected his bowling later on in the innings.

"I couldn't bowl yorkers properly because the ball was too wet," Malinga said on his return to Colombo on Sunday. "It was difficult to swing the ball. I tried hard. I regret I couldn't take more wickets." This was not the first time in the World Cup that a player had said he was hampered by dew. After England's loss to Bangladesh in Chittagong, Graeme Swann had likened bowling with a wet ball to playing football with your hands tied behind your back.

On that occasion, England had been put in to bat by Bangladesh, but on Saturday, it was Sri Lanka's decision to bat first. They had bowled second during their group match against New Zealand in Mumbai, and on that occasion dismissed the opposition for 153. Malinga had been expensive in that match, going for more than seven runs an over, but had not been required to bowl more than five overs, as Sri Lanka's spinners ran through New Zealand. Murali, who took four wickets in that game, had said that it was tough to turn the wet ball but one had to learn how to adjust and think of other ways to dismiss batsmen.

During the final, Murali didn't look 100% fit - though his captain later insisted "he was fine" - and rarely troubled India's batsmen in his eight overs which went for 39. He said the 274 Sri Lanka had posted was enough to defend but the spinners not capitalising on Malinga's start was the main reason for the loss.

"We got enough runs on the board; 274 was a good score. Malinga took two vital wickets but after that we couldn't crack their side, especially in the middle part," Murali said. "The spinners didn't take enough wickets.

"If I or Suraj [Randiv] took a few wickets then the story would have been different. These things happen in cricket so you have to move on and I'd like to wish the team well for the future. Hopefully, in 2015 they'll bring home the cup."

Randiv, who had only joined the squad after an injury to Angelo Mathews and found himself playing in the tournament for the first time in the final, went wicketless in nine overs, while Tillakaratne Dilshan picked up one wicket with his part-time offspin.

The loss meant Murali's one-day career did not have the dream finish that his Test career did - he took eight wickets, including his 800th in a victorious last Test - and he admitted he was disappointed. "It was a little bit disappointing because my main aim was to win the World Cup. But unfortunately we couldn't do that because India were a better side on the day."

While Murali had announced before the tournament started that this would be his last international series, Malinga has now said he will not play another World Cup. He has been injury prone, with a recurring knee injury being a source of constant concern, and said he will not last till 2015, by when he will be 31.

"I hope to be of service to my team as long as I can, but I won't be able to play in the next World Cup in 2015," Malinga said. "I have been carrying injuries for the past few weeks with little rest." He was rested from Sri Lanka's first two group games but has since played seven matches in just over a month.

Malinga has been part of two losing teams in World Cup finals, in a stop-start career that comprised only 30 Tests and 84 one-dayers since debuting in 2004.

While they couldn't do enough in the final, Murali and Malinga both had their moments in the tournament. Malinga grabbed a second World Cup hat-trick in Sri Lanka's group-stage match against Kenya, and then took three wickets in the semi-final against New Zealand. Murali bagged three wickets in his last game in his hometown of Kandy, got four in the group match against New Zealand and then struck with his last ball in Sri Lanka, in the semi-final.

When he announced his retirement, Murali had said he would continue playing domestic Twenty20 tournaments, and he will turn out for Kochi Tuskers Kerala in the IPL, which starts on April 8. After that he plans to play for Wellington for a couple of seasons on New Zealand's domestic circuit, most likely in the HRV Cup. He said he would go to Wellington because he had promised former Chennai Super Kings team-mate Stephen Fleming he would.

"Stephen has a bit to do with Wellington, so I have promised him I would come to play for two years to help them," Muralitharan said. "It's up to Stephen to put through a deal for me. I've always enjoyed playing there. You have nice, friendly people and a competitive [international] cricket team given that they made the [World Cup] semi-finals again."

Murali will also spend time working on his plan to build a sports complex for war-displaced civilians. "Cricket unites communities," he said. "We can use the game to reach out and help those who are less privileged than us, to make their lives a little bit easier."

such a great cricketer .i cant think we can see in like murali in cricket world

Posted by &nbsp
on (April 5, 2011, 10:34 GMT)

i personnaly think tat SL played very slowly in the beginning so as to not lose wickets and to save their so called fragile middle order against a rise-from-nowhere indian bowling..but they failed to do so and it was indeed that middle order which saved their head by giving them a respectable total...so it was this miscalculation that made them lose their plot on saturday...

Posted by ikey
on (April 5, 2011, 10:30 GMT)

@solangaraachchi : Mate..if u said it after the england match i would have may agreed to think that way ( IND's is worst bowling attack) but after the wins against WI,AUS,PAK of which wins against WI and PAK came after bowling them out ..how could you even think that way?! afridi comes in at 8 that is PAK's batting depth..IND maintained pressure by bowling many dots and superb fielding..Atleast ur team management dint think that IND's was weakest bowling attack thats why ur openers who destroyed other minnow bowling atatcks struggled big time to get runs!! and if u want to take kula out take his runs 35 odd out of the equation too!! u cant have all mate..we all know how good a batsman dilhara is!! SL fielded what they thought was their best 11 against IND but lost..

Posted by &nbsp
on (April 5, 2011, 6:04 GMT)

Ambani factor ;) was very strong than the dew factor for Malinga to not bowl his best!!! any bet?????

Posted by solangaarachchi
on (April 5, 2011, 4:15 GMT)

many reasons for the loss. we should bat second. history tells indian are good chasing side due to their superb batting line up.Also inclusion of kelasekara leaked so many runs. We need a quick bowler like Dilhara against indian. They are very good at slow bowlers and spinners. Other thing is Gambir innings. That is majestic. If I judged MoM I select Gambir instead of Dhoni. He played wonderfully well in pressure time esp for Malinga. SL didn't have explosive start against arguably the world weakest bowling attack. SL didn't apply enough pressure in middle overs ( at least slip)

Posted by vbalacts
on (April 4, 2011, 20:23 GMT)

Malinga is crying like a kid. SL won the toss, they spent few days in Mumbai before the match and they infact played a game against NZ in this ground. They must know the dew factor and why they chose batting first? Weather did not change overnight. They were not at all forced to bat first and its their decision. why is this excuse? They should learn to appreciate opposition effort and admit their weakness.

Posted by umpatel
on (April 4, 2011, 16:07 GMT)

Well analysis mrgupta..they have not beat significant team and India did.

Posted by bigwonder
on (April 4, 2011, 15:50 GMT)

Congratulations India!!!!! This was a terrific and famous win. Both teams had one loss and one tie/NR before final. Both have wicketkeeper/batsman as their captain. Both teams were #2 at the end of their group stage. The only difference, India beat previous World cup champions to reach final and Srilanka beat teams who have never won the world-cup. Despite of this win, Team India will be (as always) humble and polite unlike other team that we know of. Chak de India.

Posted by mrgupta
on (April 4, 2011, 15:24 GMT)

I don't want to sound harsh but how many among the top 6 teams did SL defeated? They lost to Pak, they lost to India, their only significant Win was against Eng whom they defeated convincingly but how good was English team after loosing KP, Stuart Broad, Shezad etc? Logically speaking, being a Worthy Champion is about doing well against each and every quality opposition. Out of top 6 teams India played against all and lost only to SA. SL played against all but SA and Won only against Eng. I am so happy that Sanga Won the Toss in the Finals else SL wud have been all over complaining that they lost because of the Toss Factor!

Posted by ranga_s
on (April 4, 2011, 15:16 GMT)

@ Man007: get ur facts straight.....Sangakkara did not lose the toss first time and it was proved by enhanced Audio that even in the first time he called for Heads....he had every right to stick to it as he called correctly but sportsmanship was in his part to agree for a re-toss...Dhoni heard it tails so he did good too but the truth is Sangakkara called it correctly twice....Do not say things u hve no idea and secondly the game started late..it started at 7pm while it was schedule to begin at 6.30pm. Indians bowled so slowly it took them 40 extra minutes to complete the 50 overs. And as mandatory 20 minutes break is a must so again do not comment without knowing anything about the game....Btw MS rocks.....The best player I've seen from India..Gutsy skipper...Me being a SL, I'm happy u played such a fabulous knock to get the title..Gambhir set it up..bt if it wasn't for MS Idia won't win....Sad, but enjoyed the game immensely...well done India...we'll meet again...

Why was it that Australia put in such a hazy performance in a match that mattered so much? Of the two teams they are the more experienced, the more used to winning and entering this week the more confident

Australia's selectors and management have been accused of being too harsh on Brad Haddin but the team's horrible display at Edgbaston suggests that they may actually have been too lenient, and not just on him

Australia's selectors and management have been accused of being too harsh on Brad Haddin but the team's horrible display at Edgbaston suggests that they may actually have been too lenient, and not just on him

Why was it that Australia put in such a hazy performance in a match that mattered so much? Of the two teams they are the more experienced, the more used to winning and entering this week the more confident