Decided Apr 18, 2000
Case Ruling: WILLIAMS v. WARDEN TAYLOR
A Virginia jury convicted petitioner Williams of robbery and capital murder, and, after a sentencing hearing, found a probability of future dangerousness and unanimously fixed his punishment at death, applying the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.

In habeas corpus proceedings, a federal trial judge [overruled] the death sentence [because it] was constitutionally infirm on ineffective-assistance grounds, identifying five categories of mitigating evidence that counsel had failed to introduce. The Virginia Supreme Court then re-imposed the death penalty.

Held:

(Stevens, joined by OíConnor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer)The death penalty conviction is overturned on ineffective-assistance grounds.

Held:

(OíConnor, joined by Rehnquist, Kennedy, Thomas, and in part by Scalia)The section of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act intended to shorten the time between sentencing and executions in capital punishment cases is upheld.

Dissent:

(Rehnquist, joined by Thomas and Scalia)I agree with the Courtís interpretation upholding the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act but disagree with its decision to grant habeas relief in this case. The murder was just one act in a crime spree that lasted most of Williamsís life. There was strong evidence that petitioner would continue to be a danger to society, both in and out of prison. A jury would not have been swayed by potential mitigating evidence demonstrating that petitioner had a terrible childhood and a low IQ.