For those of you who have not read the article, let's examine some of its central claims.

"GirlWithNoJob, JackieOProblems, and the rest of the Instagram-famous family have gone to great lengths to conceal the identity of their Islamophobic mother."

This appears to be accurate.

The author demonstrated that Pamela Geller's kids don't associate themselves with her publicly. And Pamela Geller can reasonably be described as Islamophobic, meaning she is afraid of Muslims. (The word "phobia" means "a fear of," not "racist" or "hater".)

Let's start with the first issue. Why the public distance from mom?

There are many reasons I can think of.

Fear of getting killed, because Mom is marked for death by radical Islamic terrorists (you know, the people she's so "extremist" about.)

I don't agree that Lorenz should be bullied or doxxed (her personal information revealed) in the same vicious way as she targeted these young women. Even though she appears to relish every blow she has caused to their career.

Campus culture, a culture in which reality is "relative" and "microaggressions" (like looking at someone the wrong way) are exaggerated and actual physical aggression is frequently justified as a response to "colonialism."

The standard Ms. Lorenz sets would effectively exclude 99.999999999999% of the adult population from both job and discourse (author's note: implicit bias). I challenge you to find me a single person who has NEVER said something hateful about a group of people.

Of course there is such a thing as real racism, and I definitely know what it is, being Jewish and all. But common sense would dictate the following: Facts are not racist.

When a Jew does something bad, it is not racist to report it.

When a Jew wearing very religious garb does something bad, it is not racist to report that the Jewish person who did the bad thing espouses Orthodox Judaism.

In just the same way, a well-known Christian who professes to be religious, but who violates the tenets of their faith, will absolutely be called out on that, and doing so is not "racist" or "hateful" or "anti-religious" or any of those things. It is simply reporting fact.

We now arrive at the central question of Lorenz's article for The Daily Beast: Is Geller a racist, by the actual definition of racism, which for our purposes means hatred of Islam (a religion, not a race).

We should examine this question about Geller dispassionately, because it has larger implications. To wit:

If she is telling the truth, and we call her a racist for doing so, then truth-telling has become a racist act in our country.

‏If she has an opinion "we" don't like, and we call her a racist because of this, then having an opinion of your own has become a racist act in our country.

Let's have a look around. Which of these headlines is racist? Are any of them untrue or misleading? Which of them present a perspective that reflects hate?

‏These stories focus more specifically on Geller's belief that extremist Muslims are waging a religious war against the West in order to conquer it. Which of them are racist - meaning untrue or misleading or deliberately skewed so as to stir up hate?

‏Meet Mohammad Tawhidi, a.k.a. @Imamofpeace, a vocal opponent of radical Islamic extremists. Is he a racist? Is he a Muslim-hater?

‏Chelsea Clinton is also reputationally tied to both her mother and her father. And as such, it makes sense that she would use her influence at The Daily Beast to encourage editorially biased articles.

‏Who can forget this article by Jennings Brown for The Daily Beast, a "hit job" about David Seaman?

Seaman also spent a significant amount of time analyzing the Wikileaks emails, in particular those emails which suggested that John Podesta, Hillary Clinton's campaign manager and a longtime Clinton associate, could be a pedophile.

As it happens, Seaman has been permanently banned both from Twitter and from YouTube.

It seems to me that the Taylor Lorenz article is more honestly viewed not as an attempt to stop the spread of racism in our country -- which is a laudable and important goal -- but rather as an attempt to silence certain political views under the guise of fighting racism.

‏Just like CNN, MSNBC, Vice, Fox News, and many other media outlets, The Daily Beast claims to report the news objectively, but the truth is that it focuses only on one side of the story so as to school the reader in a certain view of the world. A view that serves the Clintons.

‏Where the The Daily Beast is concerned, this statement may not even go far enough.

It is possible that Chelsea Clinton's influence guarantees they are weaponized to attack President Trump in particular.

Just because Hillary lost.

In fact, the whole purpose of the Lorenz article is to attack Geller as a strong Trump supporter:

"one family member in particular....their mother, the anti-Islam activist, hate-monger, and diehard Trump supporter Pamela Geller."

‏Payback.

Remember when Valerie Jarrett said this? (The source is anonymous and disputed, but I followed that particular source for years and believe it. Judge for yourself.)

‏Like many of you, I alerted the Secret Service when Podesta recently said this, too.

‏In Hillary Clinton's world, facts do not make a difference. She has been very clear on that point. ‏In Hillary Clinton's world, the only thing that matters is power.

In the words of her mentor, Saul Alinsky: "If the ends don't justify the means, what does?"

‏Alinsky taught Hillary to viciously attack individuals, to hurt them personally, to do anything necessary so as to attain power.

‏It is in this context that we can understand Taylor Lorenz, a "useful idiot" for the Clintons, who to say nice things while doing some very bad ones - to white people, brown people, Jewish people, Muslim people, in fact anyone who serves their needs.

Fortunately for us, Hillary Clinton is not a very intelligent woman. Unfortunately however, her political and financial resources remain vast.

To President Trump I ask only this: How long will it take before you finally lock her up?

__________
Copyright 2017 by Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal. All opinions are Dr. Blumenthal's own. This post is hereby released into the public domain. Photo source: Screenshot from "Pam Geller Answers Trump Slam By Invoking Rosa Parks," a Youtube video by The Young Turks (May 5, 2015).