powered by community, democracy, and you.

Most paid coaches are awful teachers too, so that point's kind of a wash. I don't know how much overlap there is between LoL players and experienced teachers, but I'd hazard a guess that it's not much.

To add to this: don't pay for coaching if you're this bad. Or anywhere near this bad really. Paid coaches, if anything, are to get you from diamond to challenger. Below that there are lots of people on the internet better than you and happy to lend a hand.

I think you're misunderstanding the purpose of a-move. You still attempt to click on your desired target. If you succeed, there's no difference. If you misclick, you'll fire off an auto at something instead of walking toward your target, which is in general way less hazardous.

The point is that using this definition renders the word "gnostic" entirely useless (outside of discussion of how useless it is). If you define it to use the same standard of knowledge that we apply in everyday life then it is useful (and rather more sensible besides).

Who's talking about taxes? Please stay on topic. We're talking about the fact that Justin Trudeau supports introducing criminal penalties for the non-violent and victimless crime of not wanting to provide extraneous information about your household to government officials.

He's talking about taxes because it shows why your argument falls apart. A point you're stubbornly ignoring, by the way.

It takes faith to say "there is definitely, absolutely no possibility that God exists"

That depends on what you mean by 'God'. The claim "Yahweh doesn't exist," takes no more faith than "Santa doesn't exist," which I think is a reasonable thing to claim knowledge of. Once you've specified a particular god, claiming its non-existence is generally reasonable.

No! Nonononononono. "Traitors living among us" are no more a threat now than they ever were. ISIS is scum, but they're half a world away. Statistically you're safer in Canada now than you have ever been. There are countless ways you could die on any given day; a terrorist attack is one of the least likely.

What we DO need to be vigilant against are people who would use the fear caused by terrorism to manipulate us. Bill C-51 is being railroaded through parliament with nowhere near the scrutiny it deserves. Politicians like Harper harp on about terrorists ignoring the fact that they do far more damage to Canada as a country than any terrorist ever has.

We're civilians. We're not at war. We're not fighting ISIS. We might worry about what ISIS is doing for humanitarian reasons, but fighting them isn't our job. Our job - besides whatever we do for a paycheque - is to stay informed about the things that do directly affect our country and be part of the political process. We don't need new anti-terror legislation, we need better social services. We need education reform. We need a more functional voting system. We need more transparency of government agencies. We need to find a balance between economic and environmental concerns. We need to reinstate the long form census. We need so much, and here we are worrying about ISIS of all things. ISIS is not a threat to Canada, and we've got no business trying to fix other people's problems if we can't even handle our own.

If you build items that give you defensive stats over pure damage items that is not inherent tankiness, it's just a tanky build and every champ has the option to go for that.

It's not that simple either though, because not all builds are equally effective on all champions. As an example: Irelia isn't inherently much tankier than Fiora, but because Irelia can reach a useful damage output with only one item she ends up tankier than Fiora in practice. Certainly Fiora could build one damage item into tank, but it wouldn't be good.

Following up on /u/safety_jam's comment, Trudeau was asked about this when he spoke at my school. He said that he doesn't favour proportional representation (for the reason you quoted) and instead thinks that we should be looking to some variant of a ranked ballot or runoff vote. He did not voice support for FPTP.

Haha, no worries. Finding an intelligent discussion in /r/worldnews is totally worth a few internet points. I've taken various courses on ethics and morality and never liked the "natural right" language. A legal right is a pretty clear term, and I find it more sensible to talk about which things we ought to legislate as rights rather than which things inherently are rights. The normative language seems more appropriate.

That's entirely reasonable, and if you change the wording a bit I'd probably agree. I certainly agree with the moral statement that a person ought to be treated well, but I think that calling that a right muddies the waters between morality and legality too much. There are places (for example) where a man has the right to beat his wife. No one here would say that's moral, but then you've overloaded the term and you're stuck differentiating between kinds of rights.

What you are talking about are called Negative Rights, which are "rights" that you have only because the government allows you to have them.

"Which you only have because there is a government to enforce that right" would be more accurate I think. What does a 'right' even mean if it neither allows nor protects you from anything? If a right is just "a thing you would have if things were nice" then it seems like you're simply conflating rights with some combination of morality and needs.

I'm saying that the development of political thought in the West has generally agreed that human beings have natural rights

And in this vein I would say that humans have natural needs and a sense of morality. A government can base rights on those things (and this would be generally a good thing to do, I think) but that doesn't make them fundamentally the same thing.

I See that you are trying light runs? why? the amount of extra loot and crits is well worth it, and torches just wastes alot of money.

Speaking for myself, I do mostly light runs because they're lower risk. Partly because of surprise, partly because of less variance in damage, partly because I've found an absurd number of sun trinkets. Takes me longer to gear up, but the tradeoff is I've made it to level 5 dungeons without losing a man.

How do you get denied as Irelia? If he tries to fight you he pushes the lane, and Irelia has the easiest under-turret farming of any champion in the game. Just let the wave push and take your free farm.