She’s the white Starbucks manager who called the cops on those two black guys in Philadelphia a little while back.

She’s from Dayton you know? Went to Wright State before moving to the City of Brotherly Love in 2014. Majored in Spanish. Got her masters at LaSalle University.

Since all this happened, she’s pretty much disappeared. She took down her LinkedIn page. Refused all interview requests. Don’t blame her a bit.

She’s been flat out called a “bigot” and a “racist.” What’s she supposed to say to that? “No, I’m not!”?

The CEO of Starbucks essentially accused her of “racial profiling” within hours of the incident and abjectly apologized to her alleged victims on behalf of the company.

Is it true? Is Holly a race-profiling racist?

At least one of her customers thinks not. She called into a conservative radio show shortly after the incident.

“From my observations and interactions with her, I was actually under the impression that Holly is an SJW feminist of the highest order,” she said.

Holly’s “colorful hair” and “hippie pins” gave her away.

“Once I even overheard her scold a male barista for not using the proper neutral pronouns with somebody. That's why this whole situation is so shocking to me! Even though I did not agree with her and all the SJW pins that adorn her beanie, I think calling her a racist all over the news and doxing her name, address, phone, family, etc. is disgusting.”

All this leads me to wonder whether Holly has gotten herself a lawyer. Because I sure would have if I had been publicly accused of being a racist and fired from my job.

I would definitely have lawyered up if I knew the charges against me were false and that I was simply following company policy in asking the two gentlemen to leave the premises, their race having nothing to do with it.

My attorney would be suing Starbucks and its CEO Kevin Johnson for slandering me and attempting to sacrifice my good name on their bloody altar of progressive virtue.

And you know what? They would pay. And I bet they will pay Holly because they have no proof, none whatsoever, that she acted out of racial malice or bias. It is simply assumed. And that’s not good enough.

This is a company whose store managers have refused use of its bathrooms to cops, pregnant women, and all sorts of other non-paying walk-ins for years.

Look it up. In Philly, a beat cop; in Phoenix, a woman who was eight months pregnant. “Sorry,” they were told, “our bathrooms are for paying customers only.”

And what did company flak catchers do when those incidents hit social media? They apologized, of course.

They said they were working terribly hard to rectify the company’s problem of improper bathroom denial. But, of course, that wasn’t the real problem in those cases. The real problem was bad publicity. It certainly wasn’t an “implicit bias” problem against cops or pregnant ladies. But suddenly, now that two unintimidated black men have felt the sting of denial, it is. And a simple, phony apology simply won’t cut it.

So now, not only is Holly presumed guilty but so is Starbucks’ entire workforce. Some 8,000 workers will be required to sit through “implicit bias training” to cure them of this sad and dangerous condition.

Or as Andrew Ferguson recently wrote about IBT: “... untutored trainers instructing blameless subjects in bogus science to cure a psychological defect that can’t be shown to exist, all at a staggering expense of time and money.”

Yes, IBT is a pseudo-scientific form of attempted thought control that not even its own inventor believes should be mandatory. But for a company like Starbucks that prides itself on being at the cutting edge of the latest progressive fad, it’s definitely necessary. If for no other than for P.R. reasons.

And now for the best news of all: no longer will you have to buy anything at Starbucks to hang out or use their restrooms.

Starbucks has announced its stores are now public spaces, open to all comers; from cops, to pregnant ladies to students to business folk to hippies, hobos and the homeless who have no place else to go.

Let’s see how that works out.

As for Holly, as I said, if she’s smart, she, too, will receive a generous settlement for the shabby way she’s been treated by her former employer.

Her “victims” got theirs. Now she deserves to get her’s.

At Starbucks, it’s victims all the way down.

Gil Spencer is a Hyde Park resident and member of the Enquirer Board of Contributors.