Denis O’Brien has now launched five legal attacks against the public
interest in the last several months. He is a “wealthy serial litigator”,
as The Irish Times put it.

Let’s take them in chronological order and then look at the broader
issues they raise about inequality and power in Ireland.

First, in May, RTE was preparing a report about the state-owned bank
IBRC (formerly Anglo Irish) and its sale of the company Siteserv to
Denis O’Brien. O’Brien said this would infringe his privacy because it
would lead to revelations about his banking affairs with IBRC. O’Brien
went to the courts and obtained a legal order to prevent RTE from going
ahead with the programme. It was successful, and RTE postponed airing
it.

Second, a few days later, in the Dail, Catherine Murphy TD claimed that
IBRC had apparently made loans to Denis O’Brien on favourable terms,
like charging him an interest rate of 1.25% when it could have charged
7.5%. If true, this means a significant loss for IBRC and for taxpayers.

But again, O’Brien sought to repress this information and sent
solicitor’s letters to several media organisations asserting that no
media outlet should report on Ms. Murphy’s declarations because he had a
court judgment (injunction) that said so. He was again successful in
virtually shutting down all news outlets in the country for a few days,
until the courts confirmed that they could indeed publish the
statements.

Third, O’Brien has taken legal action against the parliament itself and
the State for allowing Pearse Doherty TD and Catherine Murphy TD to make
claims about his affairs with IBRC. O’Brien argued that this breached
his rights under the Irish Constitution and the European Convention on
Human Rights.

Fourth, O’Brien recently started proceedings against the Dail’s
Committee on Procedures and Privileges (CPP), which has an oversight
role in the parliament. This is because the CPP ruled that Catherine
Murphy did not abuse Dail privilege when she made claims about him. Dail
privilege allows TDs to discuss sensitive matters without fear of being
sued for libel. But O’Brien is now going after the CPP and each one of
its 10 individual members.

And yesterday, O’Brien’s lawyers sent a threatening letter to the
satirical news website Waterford Whispers News demanding that it take
down an article about him, which it did. The piece followed others about
O’Brien, such as one entitled “Denis O’Brien To Sue Everyone”.

What are we to make of all this?

Perhaps the central issue at the heart of these legal cases is one of
private vs. public interest. In other words, the media and elected
representatives have attempted to investigate and report on Denis
O’Brien’s financial dealings with IBRC, and he retorted that his affairs
are private and should not be exposed to public scrutiny.

However, by definition, private interests cease to be private when they
have consequences for the public interest. Because Denis O’Brien has
accumulated so much financial and political power, a lot of what he does
affects the public. This is even more true in the cases above, which
concern explicitly his dealings with a bank, IBRC, owned by all of us.
There is a strong argument that the public is thus entitled to know
about Denis O’Brien’s affairs in such cases.

The underlying problem is one of concentration of power and inequality
in Ireland. If Denis O’Brien was not as powerful as he is, his legal
actions would not have gone very far. Moreover, he most likely would not
even have seen the point of suing the media, Parliament, the State, and
TDs in the first place.

And it is here that an important irony emerges. The media and the
parliament have both displayed some outrage at O’Brien’s legal actions.
However, the two institutions both share a large part of responsibility
for creating the conditions that gave rise to such actions, by actively
supporting and creating inequality in our country, and for protecting
the wealthy and powerful.

For example, sticking only to recent history, the media and parliament
have enacted and supported the following policies:

* transfering the private debts of banks onto the shoulders of ordinary
people by orchestrating a [euro]64 billion bank bailout and a blanket
guarantee that made citizens responsible for [euro]365 billion of bank
liabilities,

* keeping our ultra-low corporate tax rate at 12.5% while opposing a
financial transaction tax that would raise much-needed revenues for
public services,

* driving through a series of cuts to community and public services that
have resulted in disempowering ordinary and vulnerable people,
accentuating inequality,

* implementing JobBridge and other similar cheap labour schemes to provide
employers with low-cost workers,

* encouraging the privatisation of a number of public services to allow
the corporate sector to increase its profits,

* implementing austerity, which has led to high unemployment and included
84% of Irish firms cutting (24%) or freezing (60%) employees’ wages
between 2008 and 2013, according to a new Central Bank study.

In sum, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that Denis O’Brien feels, and
is, powerful enough to decide to repeatedly sue organisations and
individuals that inquire, or even joke, about his actions.

We have a favour to ask

We want to keep our publication as available as we can, so we need to ask for your help. Irish Republican News takes time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe it makes a difference.
If everyone who reads our website helps fund it, our future would be much more secure.

For as little as £1, you can support Irish Republican News – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.