Last week, the Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation announced that an unidentified porn actor—known, as of this date, only as "Patient Zero"—had tested positive for HIV. Since then, several film companies have temporarily shut down, an unknown number of performers are on "quarantine" while being tested, and rumors about the identity of the actor and the extent of the situation have been circulating fast. This is not a first; an unidentified female performer was diagnosed with HIV in June 2009, and in 2004, actor Darren James contracted the disease and transmitted it to three fellow performers before being diagnosed. The latest news has renewed a long-standing cry: Why are performers having unprotected sex in the first place? Why aren't condoms mandatory? Shouldn't it be illegal to put people's lives at risk?

The issue of condom use in pornography has been a subject of heated debate for a long time. California state labor laws do currently require companies to protect their workers from exposure to blood-borne pathogens, and state officials maintain that condoms are already required under those laws. Meanwhile the industry maintains that it has the ability to self-police and to provide adequate protection for its workers. AIM provides monthly testing to performers, and keeps records that allow producers to check on the status of their actors, as well as logging on-screen partners to make tracking the disease easier. The system, described by director Ernest Greene as "informal but stringently observed" in Los Angeles, doesn't have the power to force HIV positive performers to stop working, or to control hiring decisions, but non-compliance affects an actor's ability to find work. Still, it's not foolproof: The HIV positive actress of last year apparently made a film with an expired test result in the brief window between being tested and receiving her diagnosis.

And so, the fight is on. LA County itself rejected a proposal to enforce condom use in February, citing limited resources and an insufficient ability to monitor work sites. Although officials supported condom use, they said that statewide legislation was the best solution. CAL-OSHA formed an advisory panel to explore the possibility of strengthening legislation that requires condom use; its initial pronouncements were called a "con job" by Carnal Nation, which also said mandatory condom use would effectively shut down the porn industry.

Mandatory condom use might not eliminate pornography, but, according to some, it might well create new health and safety risks. I spoke via e-mail with friend and Fleshbot editor Lux Alptraum, who has written about this issue in the past. She pointed out that, even if California mandates condom usage in pornography, there's a pretty easy solution for companies that don't want to use condoms. Hint: It involves not making pornography in California.

"If California were to mandate condoms in porn," she wrote, "companies would likely just move to a different state, or even to a different country—there's quite a bit of porn (even American porn) produced in Hungary, where I highly doubt condom use in porn would ever be regulated."

Moving out of California, Alptraum notes, "would make the industry harder to monitor and possibly less safe for performers." In this, she's backed by adult industry journalist Gram Ponante, who told me that "the enforcement of such legislation would only kill the 'legitimate' adult industry and send any other would-be pornographers underground to shoot in an utterly-unregulated and unenforceable black market."

Of course, there's the question of why condom use is being resisted. In straight pornography, Alptraum says, one of the key problems is that it hurts profits. But it's not as simple as that. Alptraum also points out that sex sessions in pornography can last longer and be rougher than more informal, off-the-record sex, which makes the efficacy of the condoms themselves questionable. Performers such as Nina Hartley and Belladonna have spoken against condom use, on the grounds that condoms hurt, make porn shoots difficult, and can even injure vaginal or anal tissue.

Then, there's the fact that, in gay pornography (where some sources say Patient Zero initially worked) condoms are standard and actors still contract HIV. Alptraum describes the standard in gay porn as "condoms but no testing," and the standard in straight porn as "testing but no condoms." Some say that the first route is actually more dangerous, as a performer can start working without first being tested for HIV. Ernest Greene argues that, in order for OSHA regulations to take effect, producers would have to make performers employees, and that this would make it illegal to mandate HIV testing or to take HIV positive status into account while hiring.

"We're not hearing the nuance of what people who have sex professionally have to say about sexual health and safer sex practice," said Melissa Gira Grant, a writer and activist. She added: "The story is not as simple as 'greedy porn people' vs. 'public health'—porn people have a stake in public health, and porn people are not some monolithic force, either."

Ponante points out that pressures from outside the industry have resulted in positive changes in the past. "The adult business has, to its credit, evolved in its ability to self-regulate," he says, "but the stimulus has always come from without. This is true of the standardization of age-verification as well as industry standards of HIV testing." Still, in his estimation, enforcing outside regulation simply wouldn't work as well as letting that self-regulation process evolve: "Performers are hyper-aware of the risks as well as prevention, and that cannot be said of the general population. So I think legislation to force outside regulation on the porn business will result in more infection, not less."

As for the current climate in the wake of this latest diagnosis, the Los Angeles Department of Public Health released a statement saying that it had not received a report from AIM regarding new HIV cases within the industry, and that healthcare facilities were legally required to report cases within seven days; we received that statement on Friday, the 15th. AIM maintains it is operating in full compliance. The CAL-OSHA advisory panel meets again on October 25. The AIDS Healthcare Foundation has asked the city council to stop issuing permits for porn filming. There may well be increased pressure to provide an immediate solution, but the result looks very much like another iteration of the same debate.

And then, there's the question of how this happened. Alptraum pointed out that, in all likelihood, Patient Zero was infected outside of work. Grant noted that what she terms "the sex/death panic angle" in media coverage can obscure the fact that non-professional sex is less strictly policed than pornography. Most of us aren't required to get regular testing, aren't required to share results, and don't have to use condoms or other barrier methods if our partners don't ask us to. Patient Zero may not even have contracted HIV through sexual transmission. It's valid to have concerns, and to want performers to have safe working conditions, but the fact remains that there is no such thing as absolutely safe sex. Pushing for a cure-all is doomed to failure; all that remains are measures of prevention, which can be better or worse, but cannot be perfect.

About the Author

Most Popular

The legend of the Confederate leader’s heroism and decency is based in the fiction of a person who never existed.

The strangest part about the continued personality cult of Robert E. Lee is how few of the qualities his admirers profess to see in him he actually possessed.

Memorial Day has the tendency to conjure up old arguments about the Civil War. That’s understandable; it was created to mourn the dead of a war in which the Union was nearly destroyed, when half the country rose up in rebellion in defense of slavery. This year, the removal of Lee’s statue in New Orleans has inspired a new round of commentary about Lee, not to mention protests on his behalf by white supremacists.

The myth of Lee goes something like this: He was a brilliant strategist and devoted Christian man who abhorred slavery and labored tirelessly after the war to bring the country back together.

On August 21, the “moon” will pass between the Earth and the sun, obscuring the light of the latter. The government agency NASA says this will result in “one of nature’s most awe-inspiring sights.” The astronomers there claim to have calculated down to the minute exactly when and where this will happen, and for how long. They have reportedly known about this eclipse for years, just by virtue of some sort of complex math.

This seems extremely unlikely. I can’t even find these eclipse calculations on their website to check them for myself.

Meanwhile the scientists tell us we can’t look at it without special glasses because “looking directly at the sun is unsafe.”

Just seven months into his presidency, Trump appears to have achieved a status usually reserved for the final months of a term.

In many ways, the Trump presidency never got off the ground: The president’s legislative agenda is going nowhere, his relations with foreign leaders are frayed, and his approval rating with the American people never enjoyed the honeymoon period most newly elected presidents do. Pundits who are sympathetic toward, or even neutral on, the president keep hoping that the next personnel move—the appointment of White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, say, or the long-rumored-but-never-delivered departure of Steve Bannon—will finally get the White House in gear.

But what if they, and many other people, are thinking about it wrong? Maybe the reality is not that the Trump presidency has never gotten started. It’s that he’s already reached his lame-duck period. For most presidents, that comes in the last few months of a term. For Trump, it appears to have arrived early, just a few months into his term. The president did always brag that he was a fast learner.

An analysis of Stormfront forums shows a sometimes sophisticated understanding of the limits of ancestry tests.

The white-nationalist forum Stormfront hosts discussions on a wide range of topics, from politics to guns to The Lord of the Rings. And of particular and enduring interest: genetic ancestry tests. For white nationalists, DNA tests are a way to prove their racial purity. Of course, their results don’t always come back that way. And how white nationalists try to explain away non-European ancestry is rather illuminating of their beliefs.

Two years ago—before Donald Trump was elected president, before white nationalism had become central to the political conversation—Aaron Panofsky and Joan Donovan, sociologists then at the University of California, Los Angeles, set out to study Stormfront forum posts about genetic ancestry tests. They presented their study at the American Sociological Association meeting this Monday. (A preprint of the paper is now online.) After the events in Charlottesville this week, their research struck a particular chord with the audience.

More comfortable online than out partying, post-Millennials are safer, physically, than adolescents have ever been. But they’re on the brink of a mental-health crisis.

One day last summer, around noon, I called Athena, a 13-year-old who lives in Houston, Texas. She answered her phone—she’s had an iPhone since she was 11—sounding as if she’d just woken up. We chatted about her favorite songs and TV shows, and I asked her what she likes to do with her friends. “We go to the mall,” she said. “Do your parents drop you off?,” I asked, recalling my own middle-school days, in the 1980s, when I’d enjoy a few parent-free hours shopping with my friends. “No—I go with my family,” she replied. “We’ll go with my mom and brothers and walk a little behind them. I just have to tell my mom where we’re going. I have to check in every hour or every 30 minutes.”

Those mall trips are infrequent—about once a month. More often, Athena and her friends spend time together on their phones, unchaperoned. Unlike the teens of my generation, who might have spent an evening tying up the family landline with gossip, they talk on Snapchat, the smartphone app that allows users to send pictures and videos that quickly disappear. They make sure to keep up their Snapstreaks, which show how many days in a row they have Snapchatted with each other. Sometimes they save screenshots of particularly ridiculous pictures of friends. “It’s good blackmail,” Athena said. (Because she’s a minor, I’m not using her real name.) She told me she’d spent most of the summer hanging out alone in her room with her phone. That’s just the way her generation is, she said. “We didn’t have a choice to know any life without iPads or iPhones. I think we like our phones more than we like actual people.”

Antifa’s activists say they’re battling burgeoning authoritarianism on the American right. Are they fueling it instead?

Since 1907, Portland, Oregon, has hosted an annual Rose Festival. Since 2007, the festival had included a parade down 82nd Avenue. Since 2013, the Republican Party of Multnomah County, which includes Portland, had taken part. This April, all of that changed.

In the days leading up to the planned parade, a group called the Direct Action Alliance declared, “Fascists plan to march through the streets,” and warned, “Nazis will not march through Portland unopposed.” The alliance said it didn’t object to the Multnomah GOP itself, but to “fascists” who planned to infiltrate its ranks. Yet it also denounced marchers with “Trump flags” and “red maga hats” who could “normalize support for an orange man who bragged about sexually harassing women and who is waging a war of hate, racism and prejudice.” A second group, Oregon Students Empowered, created a Facebook page called “Shut down fascism! No nazis in Portland!”

Anti-Semitic logic fueled the violence over the weekend, no matter what the president says.

The “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville was ostensibly about protecting a statue of Robert E. Lee. It was about asserting the legitimacy of “white culture” and white supremacy, and defending the legacy of the Confederacy.

So why did the demonstrators chant anti-Semitic lines like “Jews will not replace us”?

The demonstration was suffused with anti-black racism, but also with anti-Semitism. Marchers displayed swastikas on banners and shouted slogans like “blood and soil,” a phrase drawn from Nazi ideology. “This city is run by Jewish communists and criminal niggers,” one demonstrator told Vice News’ Elspeth Reeve during their march. As Jews prayed at a local synagogue, Congregation Beth Israel, men dressed in fatigues carrying semi-automatic rifles stood across the street, according to the temple’s president. Nazi websites posted a call to burn their building. As a precautionary measure, congregants had removed their Torah scrolls and exited through the back of the building when they were done praying.

The nation’s current post-truth moment is the ultimate expression of mind-sets that have made America exceptional throughout its history.

When did America become untethered from reality?

I first noticed our national lurch toward fantasy in 2004, after President George W. Bush’s political mastermind, Karl Rove, came up with the remarkable phrase reality-based community. People in “the reality-based community,” he told a reporter, “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality … That’s not the way the world really works anymore.” A year later, The Colbert Report went on the air. In the first few minutes of the first episode, Stephen Colbert, playing his right-wing-populist commentator character, performed a feature called “The Word.” His first selection: truthiness. “Now, I’m sure some of the ‘word police,’ the ‘wordinistas’ over at Webster’s, are gonna say, ‘Hey, that’s not a word!’ Well, anybody who knows me knows that I’m no fan of dictionaries or reference books.

If the president is concerned about violence on the left, he can start by fighting the white supremacist movements whose growth has fueled its rise.

In his Tuesday press conference, Donald Trump talked at length about what he called “the alt left.” White supremacists, he claimed, weren’t the only people in Charlottesville last weekend that deserved condemnation. “You had a group on the other side that was also very violent,” he declared. “Nobody wants to say that.”

I can say with great confidence that Trump’s final sentence is untrue. I can do so because the September issue of TheAtlantic contains an essay of mine entitled “The Rise of the Violent Left,” which discusses the very phenomenon that Trump claims “nobody wants” to discuss. Trump is right that, in Charlottesville and beyond, the violence of some leftist activists constitutes a real problem. Where he’s wrong is in suggesting that it’s a problem in any way comparable to white supremacism.