Either way, though, her 10 months on the national stage have been a dispiriting period for American democracy.

If Palin were exactly what her critics believe she is — the distillation of every right-wing pathology, from anti-intellectualism to apocalyptic Christianity — then she wouldn’t be a terribly interesting figure. But this caricature has always missed the point of the Alaska governor’s appeal — one that extends well outside the Republican Party’s shrinking base.

In a recent Pew poll, 44 percent of Americans regarded Palin unfavorably. But slightly more had a favorable impression of her. That number included 46 percent of independents, and 48 percent of Americans without a college education.

That last statistic is a crucial one. Palin’s popularity has as much to do with class as it does with ideology. In this sense, she really is the perfect foil for Barack Obama. Our president represents the meritocratic ideal — that anyone, from any background, can grow up to attend Columbia and Harvard Law School and become a great American success story. But Sarah Palin represents the democratic ideal — that anyone can grow up to be a great success story without graduating from Columbia and Harvard.

This ideal has had a tough 10 months. It’s been tarnished by Palin herself, obviously. With her missteps, scandals, dreadful interviews and self-pitying monologues, she’s botched an essential democratic role — the ordinary citizen who takes on the elites, the up-by-your-bootstraps role embodied by politicians from Andrew Jackson down to Harry Truman.

But it’s also been tarnished by the elites themselves, in the way that the media and political establishments have treated her.

Think about that for a minute.

Here is part of Ta-Nehisi’s wonderful column:

What The Right Means When They Say “America”
06 Jul 2009 12:35 pm

UPDATE: Several posters have pointed out the distinction between the meritocratic and democratic ideal. I have conflated the two, and thus portions of this are wrong. Having thought on that fact though, I still can’t bring myself to see Palin is one or Obama as the other. Perhaps this is my color barrier, but the promise of more “democratic” America never meant, to me, black people, their actual knowledge of the world be damned. It meant a fair shot.

That said, Ross is owed an apology–conflating the two changes the meaning. There is more here. But I want to think on it some more.
……………………………………..

There is in this critique, a kind of Al Sharpton analysis–Sarah Palin as a stand-in for all of her social class. Ross contends that her failures are not her own, but somehow the failures that would afflict anyone else presumably from her “social class.” But this only works if you think that most of working class America is as fucking inept as Sarah Palin.

There is more to be said about that, but I’d like to move to something more important–that being Ross’s definition of “Anyone.”

In the last ten months, we’ve seen the son of a single mother, son of an immigrant, roots in Kansas, roots in the quintessentially American South Side of Chicago, standing for the “traditional values” of family, and the lesson we take from this is is that American meritocracy is broken.

Conservative condescension toward working class America, works in tandem with racial blindness. I have tried, through a few re-readings, to avoid seeing that in Ross’s column. But it’s very difficult to process the notion that Sarah Palin is a better model of the all-American meritocratic ideal than Barack Obama, without believing that that judgment hinges on race.

My black readers are laughing at me. Again.

The entire column is at the link above.

This is my reply to Coates:

Coates, this is superb, and yes, for a minute, I laughed at you.

Douthat just takes over from where his fellow conservative pointed out a month or so ago: you know, if you ignore Black folks, then Obama’s popularity ratings aren’t that high at all.

we go back to that ‘REAL ‘ America ‘ meme’.

it is because you’re Black, Coates. Coming from a people that, in their history, were KILLED because they tried to learn how to READ, despite ‘White folks stereotypes’, you and I both know about the importance of education to the general Black community.

being from a population with no inherited wealth, the only way Black folks knew how to ‘ pull themselves up by their bootstraps’, was to get themselves a pair of boots, which has always meant EDUCATION, for those of us who knew we’d never make it in entertainment or sports.

THAT is why Palin’s ignorance is so offensive to you, Coates. She stands against what your father taught you.

For my grandmother and her daughters, an education meant that the only children they’d have to take care of were THEIR OWN.

For my father, it meant no sharecropping.

My family isn’t odd or extraordinary, it’s what millions of Black folks saw as their path in America.

Because you know your history, and you know Black folks’ history, Palin’s ignorance punches you in the gut, and anyone pushing forth this woman as someone to admire, you have to give the side eye.

Tips for Coping with Black People

Black Behind Coverage/Disclaimer

This is a personal weblog which does not represent the views of the authors' employers, clients nor vendors.

Ain’t Like All The Rest

Jack and Jill Politics is not affiliated with Jack and Jill of America, Jack and Jill Magazine, "Jack and Jill Went Up the Hill to Fetch a Pail of Water" nor any of the other Jack and Jills out there on the Google. Just so's you know.