Can you believe it? We may be on the eve of World War III because a research reactor near Tehran – that mostly produces radioactive isotopes for use in medicine, and is subject to a Safeguards Agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency – will need refueling in a year or so.

How could that need result in WWIII?

Well, thereby hangs a tale.

With respect to the Tehran Research Reactor, the Iranians have essentially three options.

[1] The Iranians want to purchase replacement fuel – which is uranium with the U-235 isotope enriched to about 20% – as they did in 1992 (from Argentina). But, because of the U.S. and UN imposed sanctions on Iran, it seems unlikely that Argentina or any other HEU producing nation would or could sell Iran the needed fuel.

[2] The Iranians could modify their existing IAEA-Safeguarded uranium-enrichment cascades – currently configured so as to produce enriched-uranium with the U-235 isotope enriched to less than 5% – to IAEA-Safeguarded cascades capable of producing 20% U-235. But the Iranians don’t want to do that because it would be "uneconomic." Besides, if the Likudniks seem hell-bent on destroying Iran’s LEU cascades, just imagine how they would react to Iran having HEU cascades.

[3] The Iranians could just shut down the Tehran Research Reactor and get out of the medical isotope business, at least temporarily. After all, the much larger 40 MW natural-uranium fueled, heavy water moderated, reactor under construction at Arak, will be operational not long after TRR runs out of fuel, capable of producing not only a significant fraction of the world’s medical isotopes, but will inevitably produce significant quantities of weapons-grade Plutonium in its spent natural-uranium fuel, as well. You can perhaps imagine what the Likudniks think about that option.

Iran would ship most of its uranium (already enriched to about 4% U-235 for contingent use in the Russian-built 1000 MWe nuclear power plant soon to begin operation at Bushehr) to Russia, where it would be further enriched to about 20% U-235.

The proposed agreement would call for Russia to "sub-contract" the production of the highly-enriched uranium (HEU) fuel elements, to a French entity.

The problem is that the French have now demanded that all the Iranian HEU be shipped to them from Russia at one time, not in batches, and the Iranians – understandably, on the basis of their past experience with Eurodif and the French – have reportedly declined to agree to that.

Why have the French taken that position? Well, it seems they believe that if the Iranians are allowed to send their LEU to Russia and their HEU, thence, to France in batches, the Israelis will feel that they will have no alternative but to attack and destroy the IAEA-Safeguarded facilities at Natanz, Arak and elsewhere.

How would most of the world react to that?

Well, take the wanton destruction of Arak, an IAEA-Safeguarded medical-isotope production facility.

Radioisotope Molydenum-99, is a "daughter" product of the fission of Uranium-235, when used as a "target," in the reactor. Moly-99 promptly decays to another radioisotope, Technetium-99, which is used as a "tracer" in tens of thousands of medical procedures every day in the United States.

Canada has just announced it is getting out of the medical isotope business. Hence, the principal source for that Moly-99 – and hence, for Tc-99, the short-lived tracer – will probably be Russia. And, perhaps in a few years, Iran.

Why does that matter? Moly-99 has a decay half-life of only 67 hours. If you make a batch of Moly-99, after 67 hours, half of it is gone. And since the half-life of the daughter, Tc-99, is so much shorter – only 6 hours – when half of your Moly-99 supply is gone, so, essentially, is half of your Tc-99 tracer. That means that nuclear medical men need a freshly brewed batch of Moly-99 ever week or so.

Now it is very desirable for a radioactive tracer to have a short half-life. The Tc-99 is injected into the patient shortly before the medical procedure begins and by the time the procedure is over half of it has decayed away. In a few days time, the Tc-99 radioactivity remaining in the patient is practically undetectable.

Since it has such a short half-life, it is necessary that Tc-99 be produced only shortly before it is actually needed. Moly-99 continually produces Tc-99 by beta-decay, which means that "mother" and "daughter" are different chemical elements and can easily be separated chemically.

Moly-99 is one of the most likely isotopes to be produced in Uranium-235 fission. In the most economic production process, highly enriched uranium (HEU) – 93.5 percent Uranium-235 – is plated on a target and irradiated in a nuclear reactor.

The United States has attempted to completely eliminate the use of HEU by the private sector.

The Schumer Amendment to the Energy Policy Act of 1992 resulted in – among other things – restrictions on exports of our HEU to Moly-99 producers. Our Nuclear Regulatory Commission is prohibited from issuing a license for the export of HEU to Moly-99 producers unless, a) there are no LEU targets available and the Moly-99 producer promises that whenever LEU targets do become available that, b) he will switch to them.

But guess what. The recovery of Moly-99 from LEU targets effectively involves the reprocessing of "spent fuel," and most medical-isotope producers are reluctant to get involved in the associated regulatory mess. Even in their March 23, 2005 confidential offer to the French-Brits-Germans – ostensibly then negotiating on behalf of the European Union – the Iranians, among other things, offered to voluntarily restrict certain of their inalienable rights, including foregoing the reprocessing of spent fuel and the recovery of plutonium, there-from.

So, now we have the French – with some alleged EU support – refusing to allow the "batch" production of replacement fuel for the TRR. Which probably means the Iranians will just shut down that IAEA-Safeguarded medical-isotope producing facility in a year or so.

Worse, the Iranians will not only keep all the LEU they have thus far produced at their IAEA-Safeguarded facilities, but will produce more, if the Israelis don’t attack and destroy them.

Worse still, if the Israelis attack and destroy the IAEA-Safeguarded natural-uranium fueled, heavy-water moderated, medical-isotope producing reactor nearing completion at Arak, that may be, as far as the rest of the world is concerned, the straw that broke the camel’s back. Who knows, we may even have World War III on our hands.

201202714917 Responseshttp%3A%2F%2Foriginal.antiwar.com%2Fprather%2F2009%2F10%2F30%2Fon-the-eve-of-wwiii%2FOn+the+Eve+of+WWIII%3F2009-10-31+06%3A00%3A19Gordon+Pratherhttp%3A%2F%2Foriginal.antiwar.com%2F%3Fp%3D2012027149 to “On the Eve of WWIII?”

Once again, please keep in mind that the "nuclear" thing is only a pretext. It doesn't matter what Iran does to appease the USraeli Empire, it will never be enough.

You see, Iran happens to be the next target on the Zionists' PNAC (s)hit list. Iran may be able to gain some time and delay the aggression by going along with the demands, but ultimately the crusade will continue.

Of course the goal is to make Iran into a failed state – unable to exert much influence in the region.

In order to do this, Iran's industrial and civilian infrastructure will have to be destroyed; its economy ruined; its military capability severely degraded /destroyed; its government completely subverted; its prominent scientists and engineers assassinated; and its environment poisoned. That's what the Zionist crusaders demand for Iran.

Seems that we are in the centrifuges of American-Israel-European which prepare people with very low IQ after they are washed with waves of propaganda.After the treat was proposed and all seemed to be solved ,Israel yelled that the treat is bad and Israel is now only in 1937 and not in 1938 how Bibi assessed previously ,namely Israel received only one year more of "existence".And yesterday,suddenly ,the same Bibi with his grave problem in understanding something subtler made an astonishing declaration about how good is the treat.Why?Because the public opinion would have to understand that the "free world" gave a real good solution which was accepted even by Israel.And then the great conspirator religious-fanatic which threat the free world,of course this is Ahmadinejad ,will show his real face,you know in the same way in which ehud barak revealed the real face of Arafat and the neocons revealed the real face of Saddam and of Putin and so on.How will be done?
The Europeans (in fact the two clowns Sarko and Kouchner) will pretense that Iran rejected the treat and she wants to make changes in the what is the essential of this good treaty changes unacceptable because its will spoil the perfect treat.

Sorry,i forgot to mark the French "diplomacy" regarding Iranians objections:"France responded to Iran’s clarification today by angrily demanding that Iran immediately produce a written formal response to the draft proposal, and appeared to rule out any further negotiations over the details."

Remember? Iraq spent billion$ building a atomic electric plant by France and just after Sadam paid the French–Israel Kaboom!
Stupid Saddam,he purchased Billion$ of dollars of French made missiles and all turned out to be dudds during Golf war–the French made sure the hidden programmed missiles landed on empty farms in Israel.
Trust the French–No way .
The plan is to remove all the Iran radio active material and Israel to bomb Iran.Odd thing,why send to Rusia and sub contract to France? royally Stinks :^/

Is the Massive Ordinance Buster(MOB) ready to go? Since it takes a B-2 or B-52 to carry it, you can bet the U.S. will be doing all the heavy lifting, in waging yet another war for the benefit of our Israeli masters.

"yet they have nuclear bombs and IAEA does NOTHING ABOUT IT!! Something stinks and it ain't Iran! "

no one is force to submit to the I.A.E.A. its just the inspection regime of the N.P.T. which as well no one is forced to sign .
on the other hand of all the signatories there is one consistent and constant violator. and that is the united states.
"[b]Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any non-nuclear weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive devices.[/b]"
there is really no difference between what is happening in Israel, Pakistan, and India. whether or not any country seeks or obtains nuclear weapons is a serious issue but not a matter of international law.
a signatory state providing aid and support for non signatories to attain full nuclear weapons capacity (as in india) , indirectly support such as delivery systems(as in pakistan) or to assist and encourage(as in israel)
the problem is us!

What?? Those were "SCUDs", i.e. basically Russian V2. No french in there. As for french weapons systems, well an Exocet messed up the USS Stark good in 1987 (and they also worked well against the UK in the Falklands), I don't think anyone sent French a request for money back.

Hacklheber FYI: France was 2nd to Russia in selling military hi-tec equipment to Iraq. During the 2 Iraq invasions–france kept mum. Very obvious, WHY!
Google-Iraq French missiles
Notice lately , how Kosher france has become and now gunning for Iran and is a sidekick to Israel?
Most dangerous frat club to watch out–France Germany England USA–looks as if WWIII is around the corner :^/

The french provided the code to make the Exocet useless. It is the only reason why England did not lose the Falkland war. The german compan Steimens provided information to allow the malware code do its damage. What you have is no one wants the British, French, USA, israel products esecially when it has something to do with defense.

I really have some serious concerns about the WWIII because if now war happens then there will no mankind survive on earth because most of countries have now nuclear weapons which surely will bring the destruction, destruction and destruction. World Piece committee should have to think about it.

Physicist James Gordon Prather has served as a policy implementing official for national security-related technical matters in the Federal Energy Agency, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the Department of Energy, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Department of the Army. Dr. Prather also served as legislative assistant for national security affairs to U.S. Sen. Henry Bellmon, R-Okla. -- ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee and member of the Senate Energy Committee and Appropriations Committee. Dr. Prather had earlier worked as a nuclear weapons physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California and Sandia National Laboratory in New Mexico.