Hi! The world is currently in deep doodoo. Want to know why? Do you want an injection of truth? Then take The Truth Serum. See the true world develop before your very eyes. See the slow imposition of a Police State with microchip implants and 24/7 surveillance. See the disappearance of cash to be replaced with a cashless society. And much, much more...

Sunday, November 29, 2015

The Secretary for Defence Michael Fallon has been fearmongering today. In an interview with The Daily Telegraph Fallon suggests that cities like Glasgow and Manchester could be attacked soon, but does not provide any evidence for this. However, who controls those cities? Manchester is overwhelmingly Labour while Glasgow is 100% SNP. Both Labour and SNP could block Cameron's rush to war following the terrorist attack in Paris (that was planned in and executed from NATO's backyard and allowed to happen).

And Fallon is fearmongering this way because, as I suggested last week after Cameron pulled his hoax, there was quite a lot of support for bombing Syria in the House of Commons but there was also a high degree of scepticism.

Friday, November 27, 2015

I'll be developing this a bit more later today (I hope) but I would like to draw your attention to Infowars today.

Yesterday was Thanksgiving in the USA. Infowars have posted two articles on Thanksgiving: the first is by Steven Crowder; and the second by Judy Thommesen at The Mises Institute, which is an intellectual base of Libertarianism.

Thommesen writes:

The celebration of Thanksgiving is a celebration of plenty and appreciation of the abundance that has characterized the free enterprise, individualistic, capitalistic systems of the US. This why America grew into the most productive, highest standard of living area in the world.

...The Thanksgiving we celebrate is for the success of the Pilgrims after establishing property rights and free enterprise as that event laid the foundation for the growth of America.

From the way Thommesen writes you would not know that what is now The United States of America currently inhabited by 'Americans' had been inhabited for thousands of years by the native Americans. Today you can drive down any street in Chicago, New York, Atlanta, Tucson, Denver, indeed along any street with houses, and the property that is owned on those streets was at some time in the past owned by the native Americans. This was recognised by the numerous treaties that the United States Government had with the many native American tribes.

But where are those native Americans now? They have been herded into reservations of ever decreasing size, having been tricked, harrassed or forced off their ancestral lands by the immigrants, most of whom were white Europeans, some of whom also brought or bought their own personal property in the form of slaves to work the plantations from dawn until dusk under threat of a good thrashing.

At least Crowder, unlike Thommesen, recognises the fact that the native Americans actually existed (and is it just a myth that they still do?).

But I don't say the native Americans were peaceful. They were fighting with each other. Much like we have done through all the many wars, including world wars.

Regarding advanced societies, the Cherokee were advanced and were adapting to the lifestyle of the immigrants. But guess what happened? The immigrants wanted the Cherokee off their ancestral lands, that had been recognised as Cherokee by the United States, so that the immigrants could dig for gold and build plantations for their slaves to work. And guess who helped the immigrants to do this? President Andrew Jackson. And this is where Crowder shoots himself in the foot, because he writes:

But Europeans were not hellbent on wiping out Native Americans, they were actually encouraged to bring the people into European culture and convert them to Christianity. Plus, inter-marrying was incredibly common. How else do you explain Johnny Depp, Angalina Jolie, Kid Cudi and even imaginary Elizabeth Warren claiming to be 1/16th Cherokee?

But the immigrant prospectors and planters wanted the rich land that the Cherokee had inhabited for thousands of years so they got Andrew Jackson to herd them off hundreds of miles to the west (actually Jackson started the legal process but his British handler Martin van Buren finished the job off through The Trail of Tears).

The story is usually the same: a native American tribe is recognised to have some property rights through treaties; but gradually the treaties are broken by the immigrants wanting more and more property for themselves, to either mine or plant or farm; and then native Americans are forced to live elsewhere, sometimes uninhabitable like what happened to the Utes.

So the question is: could the white European immigrants have handled their colonisation of The United States with a bit more decorum, respect for the native Americans?

I believe so, with much more respect.

It seems to me that it all boils down to how you see Andrew Jackson.

Jackson's life was saved by a Cherokee, and Jackson promised the Cherokee that the United States would always be friends with the Cherokee. But just a few years later Jackson, a plantation and slave owner himself, was working for the removal of the Cherokee and four other tribes off their ancestral lands, which was recognised as their property through treaties. And the sick joke in all this is that the land owned by the Cherokee formed several of the Confederate states who in 1861 seceded over their right to own slaves as property, which led to a war in which hundreds of thousands died.

Property rights?

The many treaties between the US Government and the native Americans gave them property rights. But who owns that property now? And how did that transfer of ownership occur?

Thursday, November 26, 2015

By the reaction from MPs in the House of Commons today to Cameron's hoax, and the reaction from the media, I think Cameron still has a lot of work to do to get a clear majority in favour of bombing Syria. There was clearly a lot of support, but whether at the moment it is enough is not sure.

1991 : Paul Wolfowitz tells General Wesley Clark that the USA has "5 to 10 years to take out those old Soviet client regimes: Syria, Iran, Iraq".

1996 : The Israeli Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies publishes a document entitled A Clean Break, which calls for Israel to "engage" Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon/Hezbollah.

1997 : William Kristol and Robert Kagan founded The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) and its Statement of Principles was signed by Paul Wolfowitz along with Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney.

1998 : PNAC write to then President of the USA Bill Clinton demanding war on Iraq.

2000 : PNAC publish Rebuilding America's Defenses declaring Iraq and Iran as the greatest threats to US national security, and calling for the USA to assert its military might and wage multiple simultaneous wars across the globe but recognising the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" to provoke calls for such warmongering.

2001 : On 11th September, while President George W Bush was out of town leaving senior and founding PNAC members Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz in charge of the mighty US military, four passenger planes were allegedly hijacked and flown into several buildings, including even the Pentagon! This conveniently provided the "new Pearl Harbor" that PNAC so dreamed of (and it all happened while PNAC was in charge).

2001 : Six weeks after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told by a Pentagon planner that the USA was going to implement war and regime change in seven countries in five years: the first four were named in A Clean Break (Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon) with the remaining three being Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

2003 : Iraq is invaded under the pretext that Iraq was behind 9/11 and also had WMDs, both claims proven to be total bollocks. This disastrous invasion has led to the development of Islamic State.

2006 : Israel engineers a war on Hezbollah but fails to defeat Hezbollah.

2007 : Seymour Hersh reports that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had agreed that the latter would unleash the worst cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon (I strongly believe that this decision was taken because the initial plan as revealed to General Wesley Clark was by 2007 moribund).

2008 : The US State Department begins to organise The Arab Spring (I strongly believe that this was done to provide the cutthroat Jihadis that Saudi Arabia would unleash cover as 'freedom fighters').

2009 : British security officials ask former French foreign minister Roland Dumas to help them to organise the smuggling of Jihadis into Syria.

2011 : The Arab Spring kicks off in Libya one of the seven nations named to Clark). NATO twisted UN SCR 1973 into a Get-Gaddafi campaign in which the 'freedom fighters' in Libya were actually al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb who received ground support from British Special Forces and air support from NATO. Libya is now a Jihadi hell hole.

2011 : The Arab Spring began in Syria, and after killing Gaddafi the Jihadis were smuggled from Libya into Syria. Several nations including Saudi Arabia and Qatar began to pump billions into supporting the Jihadis, who received political support from the likes of France and the UK.

2013 : A Jihadi called Michael Adebalajo killed a British soldier named Lee Rigby on the streets of London, but it came out that Adebalajo was under pressure from MI5 to become an agent for them while he preached Jihad against Assad!

2013 : By June 2013 the Jihadis had failed to oust or kill Assad and faced defeat, so Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia went to Moscow to threaten Putin, that unless Putin dumped Assad then Bandar would unleash hell on earth in Syria to embarrass Putin into dumping Assad. On 21st August an alleged chemical attack killed hundreds of civilians (I believe that this was done by Saudi Arabia and Turkey to provoke a war on Syria). Cameron is subsequently defeated in his attempt to attack Assad.

2014 : The Syrian Arab Army began to defeat the Jihadis, who then escape to Iraq where Iraqi Army units leave their bases after being told to stand down. The Kurds told NATO what was happening regarding Islamic State but NATO did nothing. It was later revealed that the US DIA had in 2012 proposed facilitating the rise of a Salafist entity in order to isolate Assad. Reports from Iraq suggest that the USA and UK are supplying Islamic State.

2015 : After a year of allegedly being bombed, Islamic State had grown in size (I believe strongly that NATO and other intelligence services allowed and even encouraged Jihadis to go to Syria through NATO member Turkey, and that the bombing campaign had been a farce). Further reports suggest that Islamic State is receiving supplies via NATO member Turkey.

2015 : Assad invites Russia to intervene, and Russia does intervene. Within weeks Islamic State blows up a Russian passenger plane, and attacks Paris from a base in NATO's backyard in Brussels which provokes France to attack Syria.

2015 : After Russia bombed a convoy of Islamic State trucks (which received warning from the USA!), Turkey shoots down a Russian bomber under very suspicious circumstances.

2015 : Cameron stands up in The House of Commons and argues for British intervention in Syria citing the need to defend Great Britain from Islamic State but at the same time to remove Assad.

So what is the war in Syria all about?

It is all about a pipeline.

The NATO/Zionist/Gulf states want a pipeline from the Pars gas field from Qatar through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, Turkey and then onto Europe in order to reduce Russia's business with and thus influence over Europe.

But Assad wants a pipeline from the same Pars gas field but starting in Iran then through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon while not threatening Russia's business with Europe.

So that is the conflict right there. The sides have been taken.

But the really, really evil aspect of all this is that the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states have unleashed the worst international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria in order to oust President Assad.

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

It is being reported that Martin Chulov, who reports for The Guardian, has been awarded Correspondent of the Year by the Foreign Correspondent Association.

People like Chulov and Higgins could easily stop the wars by exposing the true driving force behind the wars since 9/11. But they don't. Why ? What happened to Nafeez Ahmed after he exposed the true reason for the war on Gaza in 2014? He was sacked by The Guardian, which accuses Russia for all the ills in the world and promoted Higgins.

Chulov and others, like Higgins, keep their mouths shut on the true reason for the wars since 9/11 but grab any mediocre award for self-promotion.

Did my grandfathers land on the beaches of Normandy on 6th June 1944 for these sell-outs?

The true reason for the wars since 9/11 is given by General Wesley Clark here:

This one shows NATO's solidarity with Turkey (so why no such tweet now?) But Jens, even the spider in my bathroom knows that Turkey is behind Islamic State and all the other cutthroat Jihadis in Syria!!

In response to Turkey shooting down the Russian Su-24 yesterday Russia should seek justice in destroying NATO's Syrian rebels and NATO's Islamic State in cooperation with the Syrian Arab Army, Iran and Hezbollah. There is not much that the aggressive NATO/Zionist/Gulf states can do. Seeking revenge with a military response against Turkey risks WW3 with NATO because Turkey will invoke Article V of The Washington Treaty, which some members of NATO are trying to provoke anyway. Russia must keep its focus on the Jihadis.

This Disunited Fascist Queendom must not be allowed to intervene in Syria. We started the violence in Syria. Roland Dumas was asked in 2009 by Great Britain to organise the smuggling of Jihadis into Syria. This was 2 years after Seymour Hersh had reported that such a covert war was to be waged, and 2 years before the Jihadis began their war on Assad.

The response of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg to this blatant provocation by Turkey has proved that the decision to award him with the TTS Freak of the Week last week was perfectly justified.

And it is for that reason that Jens is this week's TTS Freak of the Week...again.

Saturday, November 21, 2015

Israel-firsters created PNAC, after first producing A Clean Break which called for 'engagement', i.e. war, on Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, and note NOT on Saudi Arabia or Jordan or Turkey who Israel has teamed up with to destroy Syria.

PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses named Iraq and Iran as the greatest threats to US national security, and also called for a 'new Pearl Harbor' to provoke calls from the American public to support all the PNAC wars.

On 9/11 founding and senior members were in control of the mighty US military as alleged hijackers flew hijacked planes into the WTC and...get this...the freakin' Pentagon!!

Oh what joy and raptures the PNAC members must have felt on 9/11!!

The allies invaded Afghanistan to allegedly hunt down an already dead bin Laden, but it was really about opium.

But after that, as General Wesley Clark was told, it was to kick off war and regime change in seven countries in five years. The first four you know already from A Clean Break: Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon. The other three were Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

The series of wars we have seen since 9/11 is:
Iraq (2003)
Lebanon (2006, and by Israel alone)
Libya (2011)
Syria (2011 - )

Israel is thus perhaps the most dangerous nation in the world, and with an unstable devil like Netanyahu in control the world can expect a lot more terror and war.

Israel must be disarmed ASAP, disarmed of not just its nuclear arsenal but also its chemical and biological arsenal too.

Friday, November 20, 2015

Absolutely brilliant and proper journalism from Nafeez Ahmed (who was sacked from The Guardian after he reported the real reason for Israel's war on Gaza in 2014 - oil and gas off the coast of Gaza).

Ahmed nails the pipeline factor in Syria: the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states want a pipeline from the Pars gas field starting from Qatar and then through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey, and then onto Europe; while Russia wants a pipeline from Iran through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. The idea is to reduce Europe's dependence on Russia for energy which in turn reduces Russia's influence over Europe.

However, in March 2007 Seymour Hersh reported that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had decided to unleash the worst cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran, but they were first unleashed onto Libya, where British Special Forces assisted the Jihadis (who were actually al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb) on the ground and NATO provided air cover.

And this decision was taken because the initial plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11 had by 2007 become moribund, with the general public sick and sceptical of more war following the debacle in Iraq. In order for NATO to provide assistance to these Jihadis the US State Dept engineered The Arab Spring so that the Jihadis could be described as 'freedom fighters' when they were in fact international cutthroats sponsored by that utopia of freedom, democracy and human rights, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

On 7/7 Netanyahu was warned and so stayed in his hotel then took a different route.

It is dual American/Israeli citizen Paul Wolfowitz (who in 1991 told General Wesley Clark "that America had 5 to 10 years to take out those old Soviet client regimes: Syria, Iraq, Iran") and his fellow Israel-lovers like William Kristol (co-founder of PNAC) who are the public face of the warmongers who ran 9/11 and then used 9/11 to kick off a series of wars which have benefited Israel (except the war on Lebanon in 2006).

It is looking like the warmongers will finally get their war on Syria.

World powers are poised to forge a single resolution at the United Nations Security Council to declare a common war against Isis and “eradicate” jihadists in Iraq and Syria, The Independent understands.

...There is still nothing to indicate that Moscow is about to cut Mr Assad loose. However, there was cautious optimism in the corridors of the UN that Russia could not contemplate blocking a resolution that condemned Isis, given the Paris attacks and the bombing of one of its own planes.

“There is a momentum to have a Security Council product that condemns the attacks not just in Paris but also Beirut and Sharm el-Sheikh and stresses the unity of the council and its desire to tackle the threat posed by Isis,” one diplomat said.

So we've got:
1. all confirmed suspects were either French or Belgian nationals, but of North African or Middle Eastern descent, and an unknown holder of a dodgy 'Syrian' passport;
2. their base of operations was just a few miles from NATO HQ and has been linked to European terror for years, and NATO ran Operation Gladio;
3. several of the suspects were known to the security services;
4. there were multiple arrest warrants out for the alleged mastermind, who was thought to be in Syria but was in Europe, and had bragged of being able to openly travel between Syria and Europe in a Daesh magazine;
5. there are multiple sightings of white-skinned blonde-haired shooters;
6. not all the dead terrorists have been identified;
7. two of the suspects, who we were led to believe were committed muslims who hated the west, were stoners and party animals.

And now this: the alleged mastermind was openly smoking pot in Paris after the terror?!

We are told that the terrorists who carried out the terror attack on Paris were committed Muslims.

But one of the alleged bombers Ibrahim Abdeslam was not a devout Muslim but was a lazy stoner who never attended a Mosque.

Now the alleged girlfriend/sister-in-law of the alleged mastermind was a party-loving woman with no interest in the Koran who was known as "Cowgirl" due to the love of Cowboy hats (which was a symbol to come-and-get-it in Ibiza).

She is alleged to have screamed "help me, help me!", and, "I'm not his girlfriend!", before allegedly blowing herself up.

After murdering and cheating the native Americans, forcing them on marches on which thousands died to lands that could not sustain them or they could not live off, the white immigrants then created The American Nightmare, consisting of nuclear weapons, the largest and most powerful military and intelligence machine in the world, with military bases in nearly every nation in the world, after being involved in nearly every war in the world since it was established.

The ninth suspect is as yet unidentified but a passport bearing the name of a former member of the Syrian Arab Army who was arrested in Serbia was found and apparently a fingerprint resembles one taken from whoever registered the passport in Greece.

So as yet this is not exactly the wave of terror from the wave tsunami of immigrants that was forecast. Yes, the Paris terror cell do have North African and Middle East backgrounds.

But the Paris terror cell was based in Belgium. And not just anywhere in Belgium, but a known suburb of Brussels called Molenbeek, aka Jihadistan, which is just a few miles from the HQ of NATO. And not only that:
1. Molenbeek has gained that reputation because it has been linked to several terror plots in the last few years;
2. several of the suspects in the Paris terror were known to the security services;
3. the alleged mastermind somehow to escape to Syria from Belgium following a shootout with police, where he then joined Islamic State;
4. and he was thought to be in Syria but is now thought to be in Paris, and if so then how fuck did he get to Paris undetected?

But why not attack Brussels?

And how could this cell plot and execute this from right under the noses of NATO from NATO's backyard?

Is there a Covenant of Security between the Belgian Islamic extremists and the Belgian/NATO intelligence as there is/was in the UK?

It has to because:
1. NATO ran Operation Gladio, in which white right wing extremists bombed civilians and their counterparts in law enforcement blamed Communists;
2. along with other NATO nations such as the UK, Belgium has been encouraging Jihadis to go to Syria to wage Jihad against President Assad of Syria, and we know this because Michael Adebalajo was being harassed into becoming an agent for MI5 while they let him on the streets of London preach violent Jihad against Assad and encourage Jihadis to go to Syria.

And now those Jihadis are coming back they are being used as an excuse for more surveillance and more war.

But remember the early reports that some as young as 15 were involved in the Paris terror? What happened to them?

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

For over a year the glorious allies, the USA, UK and Saudi Arabia, and without an invitation from President Assad of Syria or authorisation from the UN, have been claiming to bomb Islamic State, yet Islamic State has grown, and despite the number of warnings issued by MI5 etc, Islamic State has not retaliated.

But after just one month of Russia, at the invitation of President Assad of Syria, bombing Islamic State there has been a retaliation from Islamic State in the form of a bomb in the form of a soft drinks can(?) on a Russian passenger plane over Sinai, even though NATO's intelligence department aka Bellingcat claim that Russia has not been bombing Islamic State but has been bombing the 'moderate rebels' opposed to Assad.

And even though France has done little so far in Syria, a known Belgian national terrorist was able to plan a terrorist attack on Paris (why not Brussels?) using known Jihadis from a base in Brussels known as Jihadi Central which is just a few miles from the NATO HQ, which has resulted in turning a sceptical French population into supporting war in Syria.

And over the weekend it is reported that President Putin revealed to the G20 who has been financing Islamic State.

Putin's decision to directly intervene in Syria has certainly put the cat among the NATO pigeons.

All of a sudden everyone (or almost) is rushing to destroy Islamic State.

Because an entity that was implanted into Syria, Islamic State, has claimed to have attacked the bomber, France.

But what role has France played in the creation of Islamic State? A fucking lot.

The point is this: NATO, Israel and Sunni Gulf states do not want Assad in power in Syria. To realise this they have unleashed the worst international cutthroat Jihadis. The result of this is the terror in Paris.

Candidate #1: that teacher, for robbing me of 20 years of my life's work without any thanks, and despite having at least 3 children, refusing to answer just a few simple questions, the answers to which could help me to bring this shit to a swift end.

Candidate #2: me, for risking my life and livelihood for the aforementioned teacher, her family and her friends while they do fuck all except fuck and produce more children for the meat grinder.

Earlier today in HAVE NATO COMPLAINED TO BELGIUM ABOUT JIHADIS? I asked if NATO had showed any concern to Belgium about the threat from Jihadi Central just a few miles away from the NATO HQ. I have now asked NATO for documentation on any requests or complaints made to Belgium on this matter and will post as soon as I receive a reply.

But never mind NATO.

What about TTS Freak of the Week, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg?

For example:
1. no mention of the plan for war and regime revealed to General Wesley Clark, as he explains here

2. no mention of The Redirection which predicted 4 years before it occured that the USA, Israel, and Saudi Arabia would unleash the worst international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran;

3. and although Israel agreed on the Redirection, Israel is shown for only a second or two, and is never mentioned, even though Israel has bombed Syria several times, and at times in coordination with the 'rebels'.

I believe it is much more than just a coincidence that Belgium, the HQ of NATO, has also become the HQ of European Jihadis at precisely the same time that NATO is using Jihadis to oust and/or kill several leaders of foreign nations. NATO had previously run Operation Gladio in which white right wing extremists bombed civilians but their right wing counterparts in law enforcement accused Communists, leading to the a lurch to the right in politics and calls for more state protection.

And that this HQ of European Jihadis is actually in the same city, Brussels, as the HQ of NATO should have raised great concern inside NATO HQ, shouldn't it?

So what have NATO said to Belgium about areas like Moolenbeek, and what has Belgium done in response?

Apparently nothing.

I ask this because it appears that the alleged mastermind of the Paris terror was Belgian, and was able to escape to Syria following a shootout with Belgian police in which two others died, and then openly travel between Syria and Belgium to plan terror attacks in Europe from Brussels.

This is a most astonishing and remarkable state of affairs, and one that the NATO-controlled media is unsurprisingly not addressing.

And yes, that is the same Brussels which houses not just NATO but lots of other European centres of power and administration.

And yes, that is the same NATO that ran Operation Gladio, in which right wing terrorists bombed civilians but their mates in law enforcement blamed Communists.

And yes, that is also the same NATO who along with Israel and demonic Gulf states have unleashed a wave of equally demonic cutthroat Jihadis, with financial and logistical support, onto the likes of Libya and Syria.

And yes, that is the same NATO who, contrary to their founding principles, destabilised East Europe and backed a ruthless gang of neo-Nazis to overthrow a legitimately elected government in Ukraine in order to eventually plonk first strike nuclear missiles aimed at Moscow.

And yes, that is the same NATO that is run by this week's TTS Freak of the Week, Jens Stoltenberg.

So we've got:
1. the dead terrorists were generally French and Belgian nationals (not immigrants);
2. with a base of operations in Brussels;
3. in an estate just a few miles from NATO HQ;
4. NATO stands to benefit from the resulting military action by France, now supported by the French people;
5. NATO has a history of state-sponsored terrorism through Gladio;
6. previous false-flags were piggy-back on terror drills;
7. there was a terror drill in Paris.

And there are reports of white-skinned, blonde-haired shooters present!!

So far the list of suspects in the Paris Terror of Friday 13th November 2015 are either Belgian or French nationals operating out of Brussels, with the Syrian passport at last linked by fingerprints to one of the suicide bombers.

But in addition, the alleged mastermind of the plot, who is in Syria, is also a Belgian national.

Stade de France:
1. Bilal Hadfi - from Brussels, fought for Islamic State in Syria;
2. "Ahmad Almohammad" - fingerprints have allegedly been matched to the passport that was registered in Greece in October;

Bataclan:
1. Omar Ismaïl Mostefai - French, and known as a possible Islamic extremist but nothing definite;
2. Samy Amimour - French, also known as a possible Islamic extremist having been charged with terrorism offences in 2012;

Boulevard Voltaire:
Brahim Abdeslam - French national but living in Brussels.

Still on the run:
Salah Abdeslam - Belgian brother of the aforementioned Brahim.

So that's only 5 confirmed dead terrorists, only one of whom is an immigrant, the rest are French and Belgian and were operating out of Brussels...THE HQ OF NATO!!!!

How could this all happen?

It's dead easy when you understand that NATO ran Operation Gladio, a terrorist operation to drag Europe to the right by using right wing extremists to bomb train stations and have the police blame left wing terrorists. It's all on record.

But today requires that we all hate Muslim immigrants so we bomb Syria, because Syria has been a target of NATO/Zionist/Gulf state aggression since possibly 1991 but definitely since 2001 when General Wesley Clark was told that the following seven nations were going to experience war and regime change in the next five years: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

Iraq (2003)
Lebanon (2006)
Libya (2011)
Syria (2011 - to date)

This plan has been stalled in Syria for over 4 years, and several different approaches have been used:
1. unleash proxy cutthroat Jihadis to oust Assad under the CIA-sponsored Arab Spring;
2. pull a chemical false flag to provoke an overt war on Syria;
3. facilitate the rise of a Salafist entity (such as Islamic State) to isolate Assad and give the excuse to bomb and openly interfere in Syria.

The NATO/Zionist/Gulf states have been pretending to bomb Islamic State, and have been caught actually supplying them through air drops and aid convoys through Turkey.

But because Russia has intervened with devastating success, something had to happen to drag the French into supporting big-time bombing of Syria, having financed the Jihadis in Syria for years.

That something occured last Friday.

It is no 'coincidence' that a number of the suspects were known as potential Jihadis and had gone to Syria, but the fact is that Brussels, the HQ of NATO, was their base of operations, when Brussels is known as centre for Jihadis and has been the source of Islamic terror in Europe for the last few years, and NATO ran Operation Gladio, bombing civilians and blaming it on Communists.

If NATO wants to bomb somewhere it should bomb its own HQ in Brussels!

How can these Jihadis do this right under the noses of NATO, just a few miles from the HQ of NATO, when that estate Moolenbeek is known as a centre of Jihad?

Surely this, along with the growing number of terrorists being confirmed as French or Belgian nationals operating out of the backyard of NATO (when NATO stands to benefit from any resulting military action, destroys the allegations that it was terrorist immigrants?

Sunday, November 15, 2015

It's only taken them 2 days to remember that country we went to war for in 1914: Belgium.

Belgium.

The HQ of NATO.

NATO, the producer of Operation Gladio, destroyer of Libya and accomplice in the destruction of Afghanistan, Iraq and now Syria.

NATO, the beneficiary of any decision to openly bomb and invade Syria, after their cutthroat Jihadis have failed in over 4 years to do to Assad what they did to Gaddafi.

But in those 2 days one aspect of the terror in Paris that has been hammered is a possible link to Syria due to a dodgy passport that was somehow found in the carnage. The passport has since been declared a fake, and has yet to be directly linked to anyone found dead at any of the locations that were attacked on Friday.

So Europe and the world are now fully brainwashed that the attacks were done by immigrants from Syria.

But what do we now find in the NATO media?

The terrorists were generally French nationals, but of North African descent, and a town in Belgium called Molenbeek, known as a hub of Jihadi terrorism for years, was their base of operations.

Molenbeek, a suburb of Brussels, just miles away from the HQ of NATO, the beneficiary of any Jihadi terrorism, either in Syria or in France.

Belgium has stated that at least two of the terrorists were French nationals (not immigrants) who lived in Belgium in estates known for producing Jihadis. Seven other suspects have been arrested.

France has named a third terrorist, and he too was a French national, but of North African descent. Three brothers, all French nationals, were also involved.

At the moment the only fact linking the Paris terror to the immigrant crisis of this year is a passport that was somehow found among the carnage. This passport has been declared a fake and produced in Turkey. There is no record of its use in France. It is therefore possible that the owner of the passport was killed for the passport in another nation, the passport smuggled into France and then dropped/found at the scene to connect Syria to the attack.

But at the moment it looks like the plotters were French nationals operating out of Brussels (right under the noses of NATO) but of North African descent. The only way that this could be described as an immigrant attack is if the holder of the (fake) Syrian passport was the ringleader.

Two of the assailants of Paris bombings Friday night came from Belgium, the Federal Prosecutor announced via a press release. They lived respectively Brussels and Sint-Jans-Molenbeek.

Saturday, operations were conducted as part of the investigation carried out in Brussels following the attacks of Paris: "They have resulted in the arrest of 7 persons These will be referred to the investigating judge on Sunday afternoon." , says one to the floor.

Checks are still ongoing concerning their possible involvement in the facts and some of them could be brought before the investigating judge in the coming hours.

Two French nationals residing in Brussels and Molenbeek have already been identified by French experts as one of the perpetrators of the attacks and died in Paris: "In the interest of the investigation, it will not provide information with respect to persons arrested or dead ", communicated the floor.

The documents seized and taken away during the searches of yesterday are being reviewed while the Belgian and French authorities have decided to form a joint team. Of French investigators are also currently in Brussels.

Charlie Hebdo.

Now Paris.

All based in NATO's backyard, the producer of more Jihadis per capita: Belgium.

And still no confirmation on the Syrian passport, though the Egyptian passport has been dismissed as that of a football fan.

Not only because Belgium is the home of NATO but because almost every terrorist event in Europe in the last few years can be traced to Belgium.

Terrorists? Belgian.

Weapons? Belgium.

And all this is happening just as NATO is trying to oust President Assad of Syria through the use of a proxy force of Jihadis, as shown by the case of Michael Adebalajo who was being pressured by MI5 to become an agent for them but he was allowed to preach violent Jihad against Assad and encourage potential Jihadis to go to Syria.

Why can't Belgium, the home of NATO, seem to keep its Jihadis under control? Because NATO wants those Jihadis killing Syrians and/or terrorising Europe.

The Sun even reports, according to their Syrian source, that the terrorists left Syria in February!!

But guess who else is focusing on the Syrian passport, which has still not been confirmed, while three of the dead terrorists were from Brussels and there have actually been arrests in Brussels today following a car chase from Paris involving a black car with Belgian number plates.

That's Brussels...the HQ of NATO.

Brussels.

Again.

It was only reported a few weeks ago in RT that Belgium produces more Jihadis per capita than anywhere else.

Yet somehow three Jihadis from Brussels manage to help to kill 127 people in Paris with the help of a Jihadi known to the French security services!?

And just when Russia is turning the tide by destroying NATO's cutthroat Jihadis in Syria?

Two weeks a Metrojet Airbus was apparently blown out of the sky over Sinai. The NATO media has tried to blame Islamic State, who claimed responsibility but didn't seem to know what they had done. Islamic State claimed they did it in retaliation for Russia bombing them. However, NATO's intelligence department, aka Bellingcat, say that Russia has not, repeat not, been bombing Islamic State.

But there was no consolation or expressions of sympathy from the NATO media.

Last night Islamic State claim they killed 127 people in retaliation for France bombing Islamic State in Syria. BBC Radio 5 Live is today covering this non-stop all day, asking, "what should be done in response?"

And we've got fresh peace talks on Syria in Vienna today, and the G20 meeting in Turkey next week.

Other possibilities are that France reported last week that it was sending its only aircraft carrier, the largest in Europe, to assist in the alleged war against Islamic State, which will no doubt now be given authority to raze Syria due to alleged 'survivors' and 'witnesses' reporting to the media that the perps shouted Allah u Akbar and ranted about Syria.

Friday, November 13, 2015

The British media is reporting 100% to 99% confidence that Jihadi John was killed in a drone attack earlier today.

But the New York Times is reporting only "reasonable" certainty, as is the Washington Post and CNN, citing U.S. Army Col. Steven Warren as the source.

Hmm. A bit of a coincidence.

Just a day after the Syrian Arab Army, with the assistance of Russia, Iran and Hezbollah, breaks the 2 year siege by Islamic State of the Kweires Air Base, the USA somehow manages to locate Public Enemy Number One, Jihadi John, and take him out? And with at first 100% certainty but now only "reasonable" certainty?

The mother of James Foley, allegedly killed by Jihadi John, stated she was not that impressed with this.

She echoed what I have suggested: that her son and others were allowed to be killed by Jihadi John so that the Anglo-American establishment had an excuse to attack Syria.

And to add to the confusion there has now been an apparent terrorist attack in Paris. Whether this is a diversion from todays earlier alleged attack on Jihadi John is yet to be revealed.

Having just watched all the documentaries by Pilger I purchased the other day I have reached the conclusion:

if he is not a bona fide independent agent then he is one of their best.

I cannot give him a stamp of 100% bona fide independence. The best is 95%, but more like 90%.

And it is that missing 10% of confidence that really worries me.

One documentary looks at the Israel/Palestine conflict. Pilger is the most anti-Israel commentator I have seen, yet he could destroy Israel but does not do so, instead citing the Holocaust as an excuse as a reason as to why Israel is so barbaric.

In another he looks at the NATO invasion of Afghanistan but never mentions the opium.

And in another, although questioning the War on Terror, he is a gatekeeper in that although very briefly mentioning PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses he does not mention A Clean Break and gives the likes of Douglas Feith and John Bolton a very easy ride.

On the other hand, one of the documentaries looked at the brutal treatment by the British of the inhabitants of the Chagos Islands to make way for the United States Air Force base of Diego Garcia.

Let me put it this way: Pilger is closer to the mark than most, could he could be a lot closer.

You'd think that after over 30 years there wouldn't be any children in need today.

But apparently there are.

I don't understand it.

Why are those bloody children still in need, the cheeky beggars?

After the one trillion pounds we gave to The City of London to bail them out, after the hundreds of billions of pounds spent on unused nuclear weapons, after all the billions of pounds we've spent on unnecessary and engineered wars?

Yet those bloody cheeky beggars, the children, keep coming back for more, year after year after year...

Thursday, November 12, 2015

The documentary seems to attack French oil company Total and American energy company Unocal, while at the same time promoting Aung San Suu Kyi who had been residing in London for years, sending her children to Oxford-based private schools and then to Oxford University, even though her father had negotiated the independence of Burma from Great Britain, who then assassinated him.

Another thing is that Pilger seems to accept Amnesty International and the US State Dept, even though at the time Pilger cites these two, the claim by Amnesty International that Nayirah, an alleged nurse in Kuwait who claimed to have seen Iraqi soldiers tip babies out of their incubators onto the floor of a Kuwaiti hospital, was being questioned because Nayirah was actually the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the United States.

As I was trying to point out, the real WADA allegations are from anonymous sources, and nobody died. But every nation dopes. Turkey is a top doper, but there are no witch hunts against Turkey because Turkey has been assisting NATO's cutthroat Jihadis, including assisting Islamic State by bombing the Kurds, while Russia is bombing Islamic State and NATO's cutthroat Jihadis, so of course Russia is the demon.

Meanwhile the USA and its allies have been killing and killing and maiming and decapitating millions since they inflicted 9/11 on themselves and used 9/11 as an excuse to implement war and regime change in seven countries in five years, those seven countries having sweet FA to do with 9/11.

The U.S. Government has been operating a huge state-sponsored duping programme, according to a damning report by the World Anti-Duping Agency (WADA). The allegations of duping go back a number of years and, according to the report, investigations have uncovered a “deeply rooted culture of duping” going all the way to the top of the Federal Government.

During a press conference the report’s author, Rick Dollar, pointed to the claims of Weapons of Mass Destruction as a pretext to go to war in Iraq as one of the boldest instances of duping. But although that episode was subsequently exposed, far from leading to a change of attitude, the level of duping has continued to rise and has now reached what he says are “Olympic proportions”.

In June 2013 there appeared on the front pages of The Guardian and The Washington Post, and repeated and repeated and repeated again and again and again by every other media outlet, allegations that we were all being spied on. Theses allegations were made by one Ed Snowden. To most of the world these allegations were a shock. But to some they were boring, and in some aroused some suspicions.

For some have known for decades about Echelon, and some, like myself, had even experienced the full spying capacity of the deep state to interfere with our lives.

So why would such establishment warmongering newspapers as The Guardian and The Washington Post publish Snowden's allegations on their front pages for weeks, claims that were then repeated (and thus reinforced) in every other media?

Well, the same question could be asked about Spectre.

Why would the James Bond franchise produce a film about surveillance?

In my opinion it is about conditioning.

Remember the early Bond movies? In You Only Live Twice the Chinese were the bad guys. In From Russia With Love the Russians were the bad guys. SMERSH was Soviet. In other Bond films it didn't matter who the 'enemy' was, it was always British Intelligence who saved the day. Hoorah!

A very brief synopsis of the plot is that Spectre has infiltrated governments around the world and is plotting to bring the surveillance capacities of a number of states together to form one giant surveillance grid which will be used to benefit Spectre.

This has already been going on for decades, so there is nothing new in that.

No. The novelty in the film of Spectre is that the head of MI6 apparently does not want this vast power!!

Can you believe that?

No. Me neither.

In fact, in real life, the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ recently sat before a besotted coven of MPs and begged that, because of the Snowden Revelations, they needed more surveillance powers. And they are being granted them. But how did we get to learn of the Snowden Revelations in the first place? Yep. Through the front pages of the NATO/establishment/warmongering newspapers The Guardian and The Washington Post.

Some will point to the film Spectre that it highlights state-sponsored terrorism. This is due to the subplot in the film that South Africa is just one of nine states who vote against forming this giant surveillance grid. Shortly thereafter there is a brief shot of a report on BBC of a possible terrorist explosion in South Africa, and shortly after that we are informed that South Africa has decided to join the surveillance grid. This is all well and good, but in total this aspect of the film takes up 1 minute from 150 minutes, and is broken up. More time is spent on Daniel Craig seducing Monica Bellucci!

So who has made the film, Spectre?

Spectre has been produced by Eon Productions. Eon Productions is owned by Barbara Broccoli (daughter of Cubby) and Michael G Wilson, who were both made OBE in 2008.

So Spectre just reinforces the perception that British Intelligence is looking out for us, and that they don't want all this new fangled technology to spy on us, happy to rely on good old fashioned spying.

After all, that's why they sat before MPs and begged for more intrusive surveillance powers (which they are getting), citing the Snowden Revelations (which they told us through their newspapers the Guardian and The Washington Post) and the threat of British Jihadis returning from Syria (a movement which they created to illegally oust Assad).

The film ends with James Bond and his new love driving off down Whitehall in an old Aston Martin DB5 with the Union Flag flying high.

During the wild celebrations at the great news that the Syrian Arab Army, with assistance from Russia, Iran and Hezbollah, have broken the 2 year long siege by Islamic State of Kweires air base, someone managed to take a sneaky photograph of a sad and devastated Eliot Higgins.

Poor Eliot. It's OK to cry sometimes. It lets the boohoos out.

Can we all send him our hugs and kisses to console him at this, his unhappy hour?

For those still unaware of the true origin of the violence in Syria, here is General Wesley Clark revealing the initial plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years:

But because by 2007 this plan was moribund, the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia decided to resurrect this plan by unleashing the worst cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. This was reported by Seymour Hersh in March 2007, 4 years, repeat 4 years before it occured, though Libya was the first to get them.

But by July 2013 these Jihadis had not killed Assad as they had Gaddafi, so Prince Bandar went to Moscow and threatened Putin: either Putin dumps Assad; or Bandar would unleash hell in Syria. Putin refused to dump Assad. And so on 21st August 2013 Bandar unleashed hell in Syria with a massive chemical attack.

But even that failed to provoke the war in Syria the warmongers wanted to continue their plan for war and regime change, so they facilitated the rise of Islamic State, which has been used by the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states as an excuse to bomb Syria. But as we can now see quite clearly, that alleged bombing for over a year has been a hoax. For within just one month of Russian bombing, Islamic State has allegedly bombed a Russian passenger aircraft in retaliation for Russian bombing of Islamic State (even though NATO's intelligence department Bellingcat says Russia has not been bombing Islamic State), and now the Syrian Arab Army has broken the 2 year long siege by Islamic State of Kweires air base near Aleppo.

It's all happening now in Syria.

The tide is turning.

Aleppo must surely fall to the Syrian Arab Army.

Unless the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states have got more dastardly tricks to pull...

So in the last year or so:
1. Russia is accused of destabilising East Europe when it was in fact NATO who, against their founding principles, supported neo-Nazis as they shot protestors and policemen and set Kiev on fire to eventually chase out a legitimately elected government which was replaced by a hand-picked NATO puppet, Arseny Yastenyuk and his neo-Nazi junta;
2. there have been allegations that Russia's bid to host the 2018 World Cup was corrupt, with the head of FIFA forced out by the FBI, of all people;
3. then a founding member of NATO the Netherlands who wants Ukraine as a member of NATO, is placed in charge of investigating the crash of MH17, and relies for evidence on a suspect in the case, Ukraine, who now wants to become a member of NATO thanks to the aforementioned NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine;
4. then a Russian passenger aircraft is allegedly blown up by Islamic State in retaliation for Russia bombing Islamic State, just over a month after Russia began bombing Islamic State and NATO's other proxy cutthroat Jihadis, even though NATO's intelligence department, Bellingcat, say Russia has not been bombing Islamic State, and NATO and its allies have been bombing Islamic State for over a year without any retaliation from Islamic State;
5. now, based on anonymous sources, Russia is accused of massive doping.

This hasn't got anything to do with Putin blocking, albeit belatedly, the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for war and regime change in seven countries in five years which has currently been stalled in Syria for 4 years, has it?

Monday, November 09, 2015

Now. If you apologise for treating me like I am a piece of shit, and for letting your family and friends down, I will consider allowing you to help me to bring down this shower of shit that has ruled us for centuries and sent us into wars engineered for their benefit.

But until then I cannot believe a word you say.

You can, like Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller, still smile and smile and be a villain.

Or you and your family can put behind you your upper middle class, your private education and help those of us from the gutter who your type have used and considered your servants from our birth.

Or is that too much to ask?

Are we, the working class, expected to serve you in this, your hour of need?

But always remember: while you and your lot were happily shagging away, I worked my way into a position in which I am years, if not decades, in advance...

All I asked was your assistance.

But you denied it?!

But as always, I humbly accept that if you so much as glance at me then it is an honour for me, and I will carry such an honour to my grave. After all, I and millions like me are here to serve you, your family and your ilk. That is what we are here for. To serve you. To fight for you. And to serve you. Not us. To serve you, and you alone, your Majesty.

Please accept my apologies for trying to help you in this desperate hour.

And if you and your family want to treat me like I am a piece of shit then, because I from the working class, I accept your decision with great joy, cap in hand, and hope to serve you in a much better way, one in which you survive and become the hero of the working class, while I succumb to the violence and stress of this struggle.

In yet another shining example of the blatant bias and Russophobia of Eliot Higgins, following the release of the report by WADA on Russia and doping athletes he has retweeted a number of tweets on this, a selection of which are:

#WADA page 215: there is a 'shadow lab' controlled by the 'Moscow Govmt' which pre-tested samples and concealed/destroyed positive tests.

The WADA report makes allegations only, and Russia has not been found guilty of anything yet.

But more importantly, nobody died as a result of this alleged program.

However, I have been trying to expose the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11. This plan explains all the violence in North Africa and the Middle East since 9/11. Hundreds of thousands, some claim one million, died during the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The Chilcot Inquiry into that war has yet to publish its findings, six years after it started. Israel bombed Lebanon in an attempt to dislodge and defeat Hezbollah. NATO supported al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb in order to kill Colonel Gaddafi, reducing Libya to a pile of rubble and leading to the rise of Islamic extremists there. And after 4 years of using a proxy force of international cutthroat Jihadis, the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states have failed to get Assad.

All the violence.

All the wars.

All the head-chopping.

All the throat-slitting.

It would not have happened if this plan had not been implemented.

It could be stopped by the likes of Higgins, who could use his media exposure to expose this plan and stop it all.

But does he?

Nope.

Instead he retweets several tweets on a report accusing Russia of doping its athletes, a program that resulted in zero deaths.

But the plan revealed to Clark has resulted in how many deaths? A million in total? And that's ignoring the physical destruction of those nations that have been attacked!

The argument here is, first, that civilian protection in western Syria—where the regime of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad fights for survival—is the mandatory first step toward the negotiated political transition Ignatius deems essential for uprooting ISIS, given how Assad has enabled the group. Second, an American-led coalition, consisting largely of regional and European ground forces, will be required to sweep ISIS from its main Syrian bases in the east. Military victory in Syria, the soft underbelly of ISIS, will leave the group isolated in Iraq— without its Syrian headquarters, oil resources, and lines of communication—thereby turning the tide of battle against ISIS in that country as well.

The particular statement, "given how Assad has enabled the group", places the blame for Islamic State on Assad, who it is claimed allowed Islamic State to rise to show to the west that it would be much better to have him in power rather than Islamic State. This daft suggestion is made in the essay written by David Ignatius, a Washington Post columnist, who is referenced in this Atlantic Council tweet. Ignatius makes this ridiculous suggestion thus:

ISIS played a spoiler’s game in Syria. It moved to Raqqa, an area adjacent to its supply lines into Iraq, and used the city as a kind of logistics base camp for its bigger Iraq operations. Raqqa soon became the “capital” of the “state,” and the destination for thousands of foreign fighters. It prospered in part because it wasn’t bombed by Assad’s air force, which was leveling every other civilian area under rebel control.

You don’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to understand why Assad allowed ISIS to put down roots: He needed a threat to show the West why his regime’s survival mattered; he needed to demonstrate that there was a worse Syrian face than his own—that of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, ISIS’s leader.

But if you read the whole of that essay by Ignatius, so lauded by The Atlantic Council, you will find that something is missing: there is no mention of The Redirection.

For those who are unaware of The Redirection, this was reported by Seymour Hersh in The New Yorker Magazine in March 2007. Hersh stated that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had agreed that the latter would unleash the worst Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. As I said, this was reported in March 2007...FOUR YEARS BEFORE IT HAPPENED!

But Ignatius also fails to mention the plan revealed by General Wesley Clark, that shortly after 9/11 he was informed of a plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years. The seven countries were Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. But by 2007 only two of these countries had experienced war, Iraq and Lebanon, and only Iraq had also experienced regime change, while the target of the war in Lebanon, Hezbollah, actually grew in strength and support as a result of the war by Israel in 2006 (which shows that the plan is Zionist).

The Redirection was a response to the failure of this initial plan.

However, the Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya under the banner of The Arab Spring, which was just a CIA operation to provide the Jihadis with cover as 'freedom fighters' so that NATO could provide the Jihadis with aid and air cover. The result was war and regime change in another of the seven countries named to Clark.

And after Libya, the Jihadis were smuggled into Syria and were expected to either kill or oust Assad. But by July 2013 the Jihadis were facing defeat, so their sponsor, Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia went to Moscow to issue an ultimatum to Putin: either Putin dumps Assad; or Bandar would unleash hell in Syria. Putin refused. And on 21st August 2013 hell was unleashed in Syria. I believe that the event of 21st August 2013 was a false flag of some kind designed to provoke military action by the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states who were backing the Jihadis.

But my point is this: any 'journalist' who ignores the plan revealed to Clark and the subsequent decision to reboot that plan through the redirection is an asshole and may well be a CIA plant in the media.

So for Ignatius to casually blame the rise of Islamic State on Assad, when we have documented evidence that such an entity was proposed by the US DIA in 2012, when the Kurds told NATO in February 2014 what was happening regarding Islamic State in Syria and NATO did nothing to stop Islamic State then, and now NATO allows Turkey to bomb the shit out of the Kurds as the Kurds fight Islamic State, suggests to me that Ignatius is a plant.

And what is the suggestion from The Atlantic Council?

Only America can be trusted to defeat Islamic State and bring peace and stability to Syria!!

Yet it was the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia who in 2007 decided to fuck Syria up through a proxy force of cutthroat Jihadis!!

WHAT A SICK FUCKING JOKE!!

But what else can we expect from the daft Atlantic Council and their daft tweets?

But according to NATO's intelligence department, Bellingcat, Russia has hardly been bombing Islamic State!

So if Bellingcat are telling the troof then why would Islamic State apparently retaliate in this way if Russia had hardly bombed them? Particularly when NATO has been allegedly bombing them for over a year?

And what does this say about NATO's claimed success in their bombing of Islamic State for over a year...without any retaliation from Islamic State...despite MI5 terrifying us with claims that Islamic State (and Jeremy Corbyn) are hiding under our beds waiting to slit our throats when we nod off?

So:
1. according to Bellingcat, Russia has barely attacked Islamic State and has been lying about their attacks on Islamic State;
2. yet Islamic State have apparently retaliated by blowing up a Russian civilian passenger aircraft;
3. despite the USA, UK, etc claiming to have bombed Islamic State for over a year when Russia has bombed Islamic State for just over one month.

What the fuck is going on?

My thinking is that if it was a bomb then Islamic State did not plant it, but it was instead planted by an intelligence agency, probably Saudi and with the full complicity of the UK.