The Reign of Market: Institutional Setting, Business Cycle, and Strikes in Hong Kong

Abstract

How market forces shape social actions has always been an important theme in social analysis. Since the “long sixteenth century,” the capitalist market has ushered in a new era of human history. Spreading from the capitalist core of Northeastern Europe, commodification and accumulation have become the organizing principles of the modern world (Wallerstein 1974). The advent of the market has given rise to new forms of collective action such as strikes, or the temporary withdrawal of labor power by workers. Strikes have been the most direct form of protest of the working class against the perceived injustices arising from the operation of a market economy. Although in many places strikes now only occur infrequently, they have developed from a novel tactic used by disgruntled workers into a feature of our everyday life. Strikes have indeed come to be the modal form of working class collective action in a market society (Tarrow 1994).

Chiu, Stephen and D. A. Levin. 1999. “onialism and Labor Relations in the Last Colony.” pp. 231–269 in Colonialism, Nationalism, and the Institutionalization of Industrial Relations in the Third World, edited by S. Kuruvilla and B. Mundell. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Ruud and Jan Willem Duyvendak. 1995. “The Political Construction of the Nuclear Energy Issue and Its Impact on the Mobilization of Anti-Nuclear Movements in Western Europe” Social Problems 42:235–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, David and Stephen Chiu. 1994b. “Hong Kong's Other Democracy: Industrial Relations and Industrial Democracy in Hong Kong.” pp. 133–176 in 25 Years of Social and Economic Development in Hong Kong, edited by B. K. P. Leung and T. Y. C. Wong Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar