Why I am really angry about government data collection

Chris Gabriel looks back on a period of controversy over government data collection practices and asks, “Which bit of my data do I most want collected and used?”

Government Data Collection

In the last few weeks I have started to become really angry about the issue of government and data collection. The recent newspaper stories related to various governments collecting all sorts of information about citizens got me thinking, and as I say, it got me really annoyed. Incandescent even!

Don’t get me wrong, I am not angry that they may have been collecting stuff without my knowledge. If they want to analyse the content of emails I send then in a way I am sorrier for them than I am worried about my privacy. Why I failed yet again to send a birthday card to my brother on time, or the location of the next camping trip to be abandoned in favour of a hotel will keep an analyst in a secret listening station enthralled for, what? A matter of seconds, probably.

No, they can collect away; it’s their hard disk they are using up.

What got me mad was that most government agencies and private companies who collect my data fail totally to do anything useful with it. I don’t get better service, faster services, or from government, any services at all based on the data they have and what they should be able to extrapolate from that.

I have ranted about this before; so while I simmered just below boiling point this time, I thought I should highlight the data I would like them to use and act on. The first thing that dawned on me is that I really want government to collect every single thing it can do something useful with.

My two priorities were health data on my family and I, and education data about my kids.

If they can keep my wife, my children and I well, by analysing past illnesses, past family illnesses, current epidemics, pandemics, local outbreaks of colds and sneezes then go for it. In the future if they can real-time monitor me for all manner of things, and give me advance diagnosis or some predictive testing for something they think I might have way before I start spluttering and coughing then strap the sensors on.

My kids attend school every day, have lots of lessons, lots of micro tests, lots of reading with teacher, lots of conversations, lots of puzzles to solve, and lots of homework, and once a year I get a piece of paper saying they have done really well, get on well with the fellow classmates, are always cheery and they have been a pleasure to teach. That doesn’t help me intervene in maths, provide some extra help in English, or work with the school on minor improvements to help my child become better educated.

I don’t want to know if they are nice; I know that already, they are both lovely angels, I want to know how their day to day activity could help them become a doctor, a pilot, or heaven forbid, work in the IT industry.

If government could just get to grips with the data it has, or the data it could have, I for one am willing to give it access to every piece of data it needs; it doesn’t have to capture it from the internet, I’ll hand it over willingly.

Now, while I am willing to give this data freely to the government, because these two areas can only improve my family’s health and education, I know it will also use it to possibly make some decisions I won’t like. But, with all benefits come some downsides.

The issue I have today is that the only thing government seems to do with my data is use it to get money off me or fine me for not doing something on time. Tax returns, car taxation, driving licence, TV licence, vehicle inspection tests, all things the government uses data to hit me in the pocket.

Even so, I think I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt for a little bit longer, but, while I don’t expect to be insulated from my data being used for the good of the government, I do expect to be exposed to the benefits data collection and analysis can bring.

At the moment, it’s one-sided, and that simply isn’t good enough or acceptable. In the words of an old song, don’t give me shelter (from data collection), give me benefits.

About Chris Gabriel

Chris Gabriel is Chief Digital Officer for Logicalis Europe. Chris joined Logicalis UK in January 2006 to lead the business' focus on defining and marketing its core ‘go to market’ solutions propositions.

With 20 years of experience in the ICT industry, Chris has spent his career working within both systems integration organisations and IT vendors (Logicalis, 2e2, SCC, Cabletron Systems), and has worked for the last 15 years in senior product marketing and market roles in the UK, Europe and United States.

In 2008 Chris became UK Marketing and Solutions Director on the Logicalis UK executive team, and in March 2012 was promoted to VP of Solutions Management at Logicalis Group, where he was responsible for building a common international solutions and services strategy.

In the third of a nine-part series drawing on the Logicalis Global CIO study, Chris Gabriel explains why apps are central to digital transformation. The statement ‘Every company is a software company’ has been on repeat over the last few years. When it was first uttered it was more of a future-gazing, stake-in-the-ground pronouncement – and […]

Bob Bailkoski, Logicalis CFO, looks at what CFOs want from CIOs and how they can deliver. Digital technologies, such as big data, analytics, mobile and cloud, are now more closely connected to the financial health of organisations than ever before. It is vital, therefore, that IT and finance leaders get along. However, in many organisations a […]

In this, the second post in a nine-part series, drawing on the Logicalis Global CIO study, Logicalis CEO Mark Rogers assesses how digital disruption is changing the way businesses procure, manage and consume technology – as well as what that means for CIOs and their teams. He looks in particular at a previous symptom of digital transformation […]

We recently announced at Logicalis that we are putting together a team to explore the immediate and future impact of Software Defined Networking. But to the non-technical CXO, what is an SDN? Gary Thomas explains. For the average technically minded executive many new concepts are understood by a form of osmosis coupled with a core […]

Fred Kouwenberg, Sales Director at Logicalis SMC looks at a key challenge today’s agile organisations pose for operations teams – deploying new releases to production immediately after development and testing is completed – arguing that an automatic and transparent process, agile deployment, is required if applications are to be delivered successfully. The highly competitive nature […]

A research white paper published today by Ovum and commissioned by Logicalis, reveals some interesting statistics about the willingness to use, and readiness to deploy, BYOD in the workplace. Ovum’s multi-market Q4 2012 BYOD survey gathered responses from 3,796 consumers who work full-time in organisations with more than 50 employees across 17 different countries. Respondents […]

Chris Meager looks at Corporate Owned, Personally Enabled (COPE), a BYOD model that may suit organisations who require a higher degree of predictability over their network of devices, with the advantages of allowing users the benefits of integrating personal and work use on a single smart device. Any straw poll on the views towards BYOD […]

The productivity benefits of BYOD and enterprise mobility are becoming hard to ignore and corporate adoption is growing, but are businesses getting it right in terms of procedure and policy? Caryn Johnston, Director of Propositions, investigates. BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) use among enterprise employees appears to be growing, according to recent Gartner survey. At […]

Over the past two years we have featured several articles about BYOD. Here is a round up of those posts all aimed at the CIO, CTO and wider C-Level community. Feel free to comment if you have any thoughts about the future of BYOD an mobility. If you want BYOD to work, do the maths […]

BYOD in schools, Chris Gabriel looks at whether allowing school children to BYOD is a good idea or just a faddy notion. There is an argument that the use of technology and new inventions, such as BYOD, “dulls the memory and results in people seeming to know much, while for the most part knowing nothing”. […]