Monday, October 23, 2006

A Special James Hartline ReportOctober 23, 2006Christian Voter Guide- Part 4 -

The 2006 Election Ballot Propositions:Reclaiming California - One Voter At A Time!

"Much wealth is in the house of the righteous,But trouble is in the income of the wicked."Proverbs 15:6

As we continue our series on Christian Vote 2006, we now look at the multitude of propositions that have been placed on the ballot for the November 7, 2006 election. Generally speaking, many of these propositions are merely the schemes of wealthy corporations, activist organizations or greedy business owners who are never satisfied with the great wealth that they already have: they want more money and they want you, the hard working taxpayers, to give it to them! On the other hand, there are meritorious and honorable initiatives which seek to save lives and protect Californians from bigger governmental intrusions. We must certainly support such ballot propositions.

The greedy and immoral will never be satisfied until they have taken everything that can be taken from the common man or woman. Now is the time to say NO to anymore of their ill-conceived ballot propositions. For the propositions which seek to prosper the good citizenry of California, we say vote YES. We now will help you, the voter to decide.

Prop. 83 - Vote YesJessica's LawImplements much needed legal restraints on sexual predators to protectchildren. The radical Democrat-controlled California State Legislature hasrefused to protect the vulnerable children of California, thus Prop. 83 is away for the voters to take the needed action to protect California's kids.

Prop. 85 - Vote YesParental Notifcation LawThe radical Democrat-controlled California State Legislature refuses tosustain healthy parent-child relationships. They have deemed that the stateknows better than parents how to raise their children. Thus, many young girlsare raped and molested, and the state, in their devious drive to promoteabortions for all girls, refuses to notify parents when these horrific crimeshave occurred against their young daughters. Prop. 85 is a common senseremedy for this terrible injustice. Prop. 85 simply notifies parents when their young daughters are in trouble as the result of rape, molestation orunprotected illegal sex, and the daughter is seeking an immediate abortion.Prop. 85 does not limit abortion in California, it merely provides a 48-hourparental notification before such abortions are provided to their minor daughters.

Prop. 90 - Vote YesRegulating Governmental Confiscation of Private PropertyThis is an incredibly important proposition which prevents the governmentfrom confiscating the private properties of hard working taxpayers and givingsuch properties to greedy wealthy private business owners. Millions ofhomeowners, churches and small businesses are vulnerable to politicianswho have been bought by rich redevelopers. This has been most evidenced by corrupt politicians who have condemned, via eminent domain claims,many private properties to give them to their wealthy private redeveloper friends.Prop. 90 prevents such injustices from occurring in the future. This propositionprotects homeowners, small businesses and churches from being victimizedby having their private properties taken and given to other larger privatebusinesses that have no bearing on "common good' enterprises such asschools or highways.

We recommened voting No on all other state propostions, particularlywhere new burdensome bonds are to be issued to pay for saidpropositions.

Prop. 1B - Vote NO!Highway Safety Bond Act of 2006A horrendous big government proposition that will burden the taxpayerswith over $38 billion in repayments debt over the next 30 years. It is timefor the bureaucrats in Sacramento to use the money they already have totake care of the highways of California.

Prop. 1C - Vote NO!Emergency Housing Trust Fund Act of 2006Another big government housing program which will burden the taxpayerswith another $6.1 billion in debt over 30 years. Hundreds of millions of dollarsof this bond will go to bureaucrats for "administrative" costs, in other wordsmore expensive state supervisor jobs. If the corrupt politicians would quitallowing affordable apartments to be converted to expensive condos therewould be more accessible housing for low-income citizens. Until the politicalmachinery in Sacramento fixes its dysfunctional budgetary deficiencies, it doesno good to have voters give them more money to flush down the money toliet.

Prop. 1D - Vote NO!Public Education Facitilies Bond Act of 2006The educational system in California is already glutted with billions of dollars.This wasteful bond will add $20 billion in new bond debts over 30 years to thetaxpayers' bond debt in California which now stands at over $100 billion dollars.It is insane for the taxpayers to continue funding an endless demand by theeducational system for more billion dollars bonds until the Sacramento liberalbureaucracy mends its misuse of the finances it already has.

Prop. 1E - Vote NO!The Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006Another big government rip off of the taxpayers that will saddle the taxpayers with$8 billion in new bond debts over 30 years. Thomas Hudson of the California Taxpayer Protection Committee, in arguing against Prop. 1E stated:"It won't surprise you to learn that the legislature adopted it after 3 a.m. whenthey got tired of arguing. They couldn't agree on a list of projects or even a list ofpriorities. What is worse, with politicians in charge of selecting the projects(not hydrologists, scientists, and engineers), funding will be based on politicalinfluence rather than critical need."The monies gained from this big government bureaucratic debacle can be spenton unnecessary water projects for Indian gaming industry friends of corruptpoliticians or it can be spent on the water infrastructure desires of those associatedwith the big money biotech industry.Needless to say, the common taxpayer who will be footing this enormous bill willget nothing out of this debt.

Prop. 86 - Vote NO!Tobacco TaxThis $2.1 billion tax added to the cost of tobacco purchaces in California will mean more money added to the pockets of the liberal Sacramento bureaucracy. California politicians already have billions of dollars in revenue from settlements from tobacco lawsuits and they spend that money on many programs outside of the intended terms of the settlements. For example, the San Diego City Council just borrowed money from their tobacco settlement payments to fund other government programs. Prop. 86 will be no different. It is like putting perfume on a pig. This pig will still get dirty.

Prop. 87 - Vote NO!Alternative Energy Incentive - Oil Revenue Tax InitiativeAnother big government $4 billion tax on oil companies that will surely be passed down to the consumers in higher energy costs. This tax will just create another big government bureaucratic department that will ultimately add further coststo a debilitating state budget.

Prop. 88 - Vote NO!Parcel Property Tax For Education FundingAn outrageous big government tax that further intrudes on the comman man andhardworking taxpayers of California. Would force homeowners to pay anadditional $50 in taxes per parcel owned to fund more big governmenteducation programs. The parasitic architects of Prop. 88 can never get enoughof someone else's hard earned money.

Prop. 89 - Vote NO!Political Campaigns. Public Financing & Corporate Tax IncreaseAnother big government $200 million tax that will finance public campaigns.This will allow corrupt politicians and their negative campaigns to have saidcampaigns paid for by the taxpayers. Make no mistake about it, any taxlevied on corporate America will be passed onto the consumer at somepoint. Candidates would be forced to collect $5.00 for every signature theycollect in the process to be certified as a publicly financed candidate, a truly burdensome defect in the American political system. This proposition will give an unfair advantage to liberal union causes while burdening more conservative business interests.

San Diego Local Propostions

PROP A - San Diego County Airport Authority - Vote NO!Violates federal law which states that civilian airports cannot be mixed withmilitary airbases. This proposition seeks to move forward the greedybusiness interests of San Diego who want to turn Lindbergh Field into a monstrousredevelopment project by moving the airport out to the military base atMCAS Miramar by 2020.

PROP B - Amends City Charter On City Employees' Retirement Benefits.Vote NO!Proposed by Mayor Jerry Sanders, this proposition does nothing to address thegross immorality that permeates San Diego City Government. While Mayor Sanderscontinues to rabidly promote the radical homosexual agenda in the city of San Diegoin defiance of the will of the majority of this city's citizens, he is now asking thosesame citizens to approve of his business plans. Sanders just rode in hiseighth gay pride parade, has hired numerous homosexual activists to run hisadministration and continues to take taxpayer money to fund the Gay and Lesbian Center,and he now wants the Christians of San Diego to approve his business plans. It is time to say NO to Sanders and his radical agenda. Vote NO on Prop. B!

PROP C- Allows Outsourcing Contracts of City Employees.Vote NO!Another business plan proposed by Mayor Jerry Sanders that does nothingto guarantee public safety. Again, while Mayor Sanders continues to promotethe most radical elements of the gay agenda, including promoting the pornographic2006 Gay Pride parade and festival that he also rode in, he is now asking offendedChristian voters to go along with his business plans. Until Sanders decides torespect Christianity, then we must not support any of his business plans.Additionally, Councilman Kevin Faulconer is joining Mayor Sanders in promotingProp. C. Faulconer joined Sanders in defying the will of the voters and voted for theissuance of needles to drug addicts earlier this year, as well as voting to celebratethe gay pride parade and festival. Now these two liberal politicans want Christiansto approve of their business deals. It is time to tell these politicians that theycannot disrespect us on serious moral issues and then ask us to go alongblindly to approve of their business deals. Vote NO on Prop. C!

This information has been provided by The James Hartline Report.San Diego's Premiere Christian News Source:Read Everyday By Over 7,500 Concerned Citizens.

No comments:

Search This Blog

Prophet Lounge Prophet

James Hartline is the least likely man to change a city, but that is exactly what he is doing. From fighting illegal porn stores to exposing the corruption within the homosexual agenda, James is being used to confront the powers of darkness in San Diego, California. James has been interviewed on the 700 Club, XETV, the Paul McGuire Show, KUSI, the SD Reader, SD NewsNotes, American Family Radio, and Night Lights with James Lambert. Today, James also speaks at many churches, youth groups and civic events. His newsletter, The James Hartline Report is read by over 50,000 concerned citizens everyday. His Citizen’s Alerts have allowed thousands of Christians to contact their local political leaders to influence governmental policy on family values. His group, the “Not On My Watch” Team regularly speaks out at the San Diego City Council. James is also a prolific writer and Bible teacher. His weekly, email Bible class, In The Classroom of James Hartline, has influenced many readers with fresh insights in spiritual warfare, as well as Biblical answers to overcoming some of life’s greatest difficulties.