Rabu, 24 Agustus 2011

Application of Dispute over Regional Head Election of Banjarnegara
Regency, Central Java, the proposed pair Budhi Sarwono-Kusuma Winahyu
Diah AT, rejected the Constitutional Court (MK). "Rejecting the petition
in its entirety," said Chairman of the Plenary Assembly of the
Constitutional Court, Moh. Mahfud MD. The agenda of the plenary session
is reading the verdict on Tuesday (8/23/2011) on l 2 plenum chamber of
the Constitutional Court building.

Budhi Sarwono-Kusuma Winahyu
Diah A.T. a pair of candidates Regent / Vice Regent Banjarnegara Year
2011 with serial number 2. Couples who depart from the path of
individual (independent) is occupying the second place votes, under the
acquisition-mate Sutedjo Slamet Utomo-Hadi Supeno.

Pair Budhi Sarwono-Kusuma Winahyu Diah
AT filed an objection to the Court against such recapitulation. The
couple argues, established the Commission Banjarnegara recapitulation
generated from the process that is not true, because it marked a number
of offenses involving fraud and election organizers, the bureaucracy,
the head of the village, and village. Fraud and abuse, according to
Budhi Sarwono-Kusuma Winahyu Diah AT, made before, during and after
implementation of the ballot on July 24, 2011.

Budhi
Sarwono-Kusuma Winahyu Diah AT claims to get 310,791 votes. This
acquisition is based on the amount of support by name by address set
forth in the form of book support which is taken from real data
collection District Coordinator (Korcam) and Coordinator of the Village
(Kordes) and Coordinator of polling stations, spread across 20
districts.

After looking at the evidence presented by the parties,
according to the Court, its rightful share of the vote in the general
election is when voters actually vote. Meanwhile, support to independent
candidates who have not legitimately use their voting rights, can not
be the basis of vote of Budhi Sarwono-Kusuma Winahyu Diah AT.

As
for the number of fraud and breach-as argued by Budhi Sarwono-Kusuma
Winahyu Diah AT, the Court argued, did not prove to be a structured,
systematic, and massive that significantly affect the vote Budhi
Sarwono-Kusuma Winahyu Diah AT that exceeds the vote-pair Sutedjo Slamet
Utomo-Hadi Supeno. Therefore, according to the Court, the argument was
not proven according to law. (Nur Rosihin Ana / mh/Yazid.tr)