Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Saturday, April 29, 2017

Here is one reason why the Anglican Church, like all liberal denominations in Britain and Europe, is a ghost-like shell of its former self: the craven servility of its erstwhile Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, in obsequious submission to the requirements of the Zionist inquisition.

Thursday, April 27, 2017

Publisher, author, pacifist and German patriot Ernst Zündel, who has served more than seven years' imprisonment in U.S., Canadian and German jails for thought crimes, has been denied residence in the U.S on the basis that he is a thought criminal. In true Orwellian fashion, his life-long struggle against the defamation and group-libel of the German people has been classified as a hate crime.

In his reply, Hoffman points out the use of misdirection and censored texts in the Oxford lecture and the numerous errors and omissions employed to demonize Talmud critics and whitewash the Babylonian Talmud. Hoffman documents Talmudic racism and permission for homicide by quoting Rabbis Shimon ben Yohai and Moses Maimonides, as well as from the Gemara itself, and rabbinic authorities having the status of Posek Ha-dor and Gadol Ha-dor.

Friday, April 14, 2017

O my people, what have I done to you? How have I hurt you? Answer me. I led you out of Egypt. From slavery I set you free.

I brought you into a land of promise; You have prepared a cross for me.

I led you as a shepherd;
I brought you safely through the sea; Fed you manna in the desert;
You have prepared a cross for me.

I fought for you in battles,
I won you strength and victory;
Gave you a royal crown and sceptre; You have prepared a cross for me.

I planted you, my vineyard,
And cared for you most tenderly;
Looked for abundant fruit and found none - Only the cross you made for me. With a beam of cloud I led thee,And to Pilate you lead me,My people, what have I done to thee?I gave you a crown of kingship,And you give me a crown of thorns,You are my people — why do you torment me?Listen to my pleadingAnd do not turn away from me.You are my people: will you reject me? For you I suffer bitterly.The preceding text is a modernized, condensed translation of William Herebert’s rendering (in the 14th century) of the original, “Improperia" (Christ’s “Reproaches”), an early medieval Catholic litany from the 9th century.

______________________

Erasing the perpetrators of the Crucifixion from history

By Michael Hoffman

“At a Palm Sunday Mass, Pope Francis emphasized that ‘too many act like Pontius Pilate, denying justice' and he urged the faithful to see the cross as ‘the royal seat of God.' He added, 'If the mystery of evil is unfathomable, then the reality of Love poured through him is infinite.”

In fact, Pontius Pilate tried to acquit Jesus (Matthew 27:19-24). The Talmud agrees, stating that Jesus “had close connections with non-Jewish authorities and those authorities were interested in his acquittal.” (BT Sanhedrin 43a).

So how is it that the media, popes of Rome, Protestants, conservative pundits (Bill O’Reilly, Judge Andrew Napolitano and many others), lay most of the blame on Pilate, and render him and the Romans generally as the evil perpetrators of the Crucifixion, while the actual perpetrators (I Thessalonians 2:14-15) are erased from history?

When will they—and Pope Francis—have sufficient manhood to declare on Palm Sunday and Good Friday: Too many act like the Jewish Pharisees, denying justice to the Palestinians, and through their influence over the modern media, slandering Zionism’s political and religious rivals in the West.

(Hoffman, one of the most controversial and banned writers of the 21st century, is the author of Judaism’s Strange Gods and Judaism Discovered).

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

“During the Kurdish rebellion against British dictatorship in 1920, Churchill remarked that he simply did not understand the ‘squeamishness’ surrounding the use of gas by civilized Great Britain as a weapon of terror. ‘I am strongly in favor of using gas against uncivilized tribes, it would spread a lively terror,’ he remarked.”

In Seymour Hersh’s recent book The Killing of Osama Bin Laden he touches on the infamous sarin gas attack on Syrian civilians back in 2013. Children died in that as well. It turned out that the sarin used in that attack was different than the gas that Assad had given to the U.S. which we took possession of and destroyed.

The theory is that certain entities in our own U.S. government enabled rebel factions in Syria to use the gas on their own people, in order to entice the U.S. into war with Assad. Luckily, under Obama, the ruse didn’t work. Unfortunately, this time this black op has been successful.

It makes exactly zero sense that six days after Assad finally “wins” — with the U.S. proclaiming that his removal from power is no longer our focus — that he suddenly sees fit in early April to engage in the ultimate provocative behavior that paints a target on his back all over again.

Why on earth would anyone of sound mind do such a thing?

And yet, Charles Blow “explains” in the New York Times, that loosening the grip on Assad “emboldened” him to poison a few civilians with gas.

For what purpose? Even if someone has nothing but contempt for Assad, normal rules of common sense still apply. Assad is not stupid or a maniac, he is someone who wants to stay in power. The United States had granted him that just last week.

You tell me who poisoned those poor souls. It wasn’t Assad.

It pains me that Syrian civilians are being used in this manner, as pawns, to advance an agenda. But ample precedent exists for just that.