This pamphlet talks about concerns of too many Chinese on the Ginling faculty, and concerns that Ginling is becoming “less” Christian, as well as vaguely talks about Ginling’s position following the Nanking Incident.

This article seeks to define the difference between being patriotic and traitorous. National allegiance is a topic seriously engaged with by Ginling College students. The writer also considers patriotism from different groups. For instance, the difference between how it is represented by students versus merchants is discussed. The writer goes on to reveal that students have been seriously engaged in the state of China since 1919.

This article goes approaches this subject first by defining what a citizen is. Pei-Djen writes that junior year of high school is a very important moment in a young person’s life to understand citizenship. This way of thinking begins in high school but should continue for the rest of the students’ lives.

This article reveals the presence of an Anti-Christian Movement existing at least one year before the Nanking Incident. At the conference, there were representatives from Manchuria, Canton, Hunan, Fukien, Shanghei, and Shantung. The foreigners present were American, British, Danish, German, Norwegian, and Swedish. This information reveals the far-reach of this movement, beyond the United States and the the city of Nanking.

The article outlines the type of teacher envisioned to teach this course and the attributes he or she would have. Siao-Mei does raise the issue that it would be problematic to include translated Western texts concerned primarily with Western social problems. The emphasis is on localized knowledge.

Diary excerpts from Ginling students at the Jenshow Rural Service Station, along with adminstrative analyses of these excerpts. Excerpted from a longer digitized document "1939-1950, Related to Rural Service Station" from Yale Divinity School's UBCHEA Archive (pages 8-12).

Written from a missionary perspective, this letter provides insight into the aftermath of the Nanking Incident. Hsiung speaks of belligerent KMT forces who continuously ask him to allow them to occupy the place.

Written more than a year after the Nanking Incident, this letter provides valuable information regarding the aftermath of the Incident. This letter suggests that many of the same ideas that drove the KMT during the Nanking Incident are much the same.

This Letter was sent to Miss Tyler in the aftermath of the 1927 Incident. As such, it conveys important information regarding institutional solidarity networks between “Ginling friends” in America and China.

Smith’s letter is directed towards members of the Nanking station and is dated to July 7th, 1927 in Shanghai. It speaks on the context of what occured in Nanking and how it later helped with the creation of political movements that defied what the KMT normalized as means to unify the divided state.