With impeding rise in unemployed (as foretold by Federal Reserve and Treasury Dept), this probably is not the best time to introduce a bill that will increase number of foreign empoloyees.
It would have somewhat better chances to pass in 2000. But in October of 2008?

Family Unification part is good, but will also be railroaded and thrown out of any bill it may make into anytime soon.

Now why read and study a bill that has no realictic chances of becoming a law?

It does increase, one way or another.
Go to immigration.com forum, see how many people talk about moving out because they can't wait for their LPR be processed.
Those on H1 are subject to yearly extensions after 6 years, all the way til' they get GC.
Obviously subject to employment requirements in the meantime.
Unemployment rate may go up anytime soon, so you do the math.

some parts of this silly bill will only encourage more bogus marriages if the penalties for overstaying, ewi-ing or being deported are relaxed....stop rewarding enemabag cleaning illegals...there is no reason to do so...and who cares if they marry the village idiot....tough...deport them anyway.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ProudUSC:
This sounds like a good bill then, right? I can't sort through all the terms they use, so that's why I asked for clarification. Thanks guys! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Proud,
I think AILA got the links mixed up, but I found the section by section analysis of the bill. Hope this helps.

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams on Defense of the boston Massacre

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Hudson:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ProudUSC:
This sounds like a good bill then, right? I can't sort through all the terms they use, so that's why I asked for clarification. Thanks guys! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Proud,
I think AILA got the links mixed up, but I found the section by section analysis of the bill. Hope this helps. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>