Is fwrap feature complete now for f95?
William
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <
dagss@student.matnat.uio.no> wrote:
> This is just a quick note to inform people that I am currently working
> with Enthought to bring SciPy to the .NET platform. In particular, I
> will work on the Fortran parts of SciPy.
>> The primary strategy will be to improve fwrap enough to make it usable
> for SciPy, and then move SciPy over to fwrap instead of f2py. The point
> here is that Carl Witty is already working on a .NET backend for Cython,
> and since fwrap generates Cython code we get the .NET port that way.
>> All work is done in Enthought's "refactor" branches for now [1]. The
> intention is certainly to merge back to main eventually, but questions
> of how or when or whether will have to wait; getting things up and
> running on .NET has priority.
>> Some details:
>> a) The most important missing feature in fwrap is callbacks. I'm sure
> there are other things I'll have to implement as well.
>> b) The main strategy is to first move (our own branch of) SciPy over
> to fwrap and have that work on CPython, and then move to compiling
> things on .NET
>> c) fwrap does not support g77, only Fortran 90 compilers like
> gfortran/ifort etc. For the purposes of the .NET port this is likely to
> be good enough. Before a merge with the main CPython branch one must
> perhaps look into implementing g77 support in fwrap. I know that David
> C. at least earlier stated that g77 support is not going away anytime
> soon. Feedback on this welcome.
>> Dag Sverre
>> [1]
>http://github.com/teoliphant/numpy-refactor>http://github.com/jasonmccampbell/scipy-refactor> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>SciPy-Dev@scipy.org>http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20101103/3adf3348/attachment.html