What the...? Greenpeace has mounted a ''memorial monument of selfishness'' in Helsinki, which contains the names of the parlamentarians who voted 'yes' for nuclear power and a text ''a group this small made the decision which will harm the next generations''.
I don't get why nuclear power is such a big deal for them. When some anti-nuclear power people were protesting outside the visiting center of Olkiluoto, they were invited in to get to know how the nuclear power plants work, how a ''new Tšernobyl'' is practically impossible with modern plants and how the nuclear waste is stored deep to the basic rock, but they didn't want to know.
Just a few weeks ago they were blocking roads leading to Olkiluoto! Why aren't they that enthusiastic on coal plants.
And with what would they replace 1/3 of the production of electricity in Finland? To replace nuclear power in Finland with wind power, aboutover 120thousand windmills would have to be built in windy places. And I don't think it could be replaced with hydroelectric plants either, dams in almost every river doesn't sound very realistic.

I don't get the objections to nuclear power, either. To me, developing nuclear energy is smart energy policy. There are down sides to it, absolutely, but at this point I don't think they are even as great as those associated with burning coal, oil, etc.

Shackle their minds when they're bent on the cross
When ignorance reigns, life is lost