Implications for the party system

This chapter examines the motivations of the Parti Socialiste (PS), principal mover in the strategy, and those of its partners. The plural-left strategy reflected PS's views about the left-party sub-system. The chapter also examines what the plural left implied in terms of day-to-day relations between its components, especially in the light of recent government experience. The plural-left experiment had clearly had consequences for the party system, mostly for the left sub-system, though also for the system as a whole. Noël Mamère's pragmatic campaign rescued them from the electoral consequences of undiluted radicalism and saved their election expenses. The plural left sustained a viable social-democratic government up to the 2002 elections. The success of the plural left brought out a constant of the French party system ever since it first became recognisable in the late nineteenth century.

Why anarchism still matters

Chapter

Publication History:

This introduction presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book. The book attempts to convey the different sociological contexts for how contemporary anarchist theory and practice is to be understood. It concentrates on the issue of broadening the parameters of how anarchist theory and practice is conceptualised. The question of individual liberty and collective needs raises an equally important anarchist principle: equating the means of an action with its ends. The book compares the major philosophical differences and strategies between the classical period and the contemporary anti-capitalist movements. It assesses the viability of libertarian education, a century on from the life and work of Spanish writer and activist Francisco Ferrer and finds considerable evidence for the endurance of these ideals.

Chapter

Publication History:

This chapter illustrates the importance of broadening the understanding of social anarchism. Social anarchism has shifted its ground as it has embraced some elements of poststructuralist philosophy. This shift in territory from social to poststructuralist anarchism is most noticeable and particularly important at two levels of theory. The first, and the one that underscores the others, is the poststructuralist denunciation of foundationalist discourses or narratives. The second shift in theoretical territory is less pronounced but nonetheless real. The chapter suggests that, when situated alongside the practices of new social movements associated with the anticapitalist protests, the poststructuralist perspective affords insight into how new modes of anarchist practice are emerging. It also highlights how anarchist theory and practice is evolving into something distinct and is, at the same time, nurturing contemporary modes of resistance against traditional social, political and economic forms of oppression.