A Confirmation from Stockholm.
Robert Langer provides a series of beautiful examples as proof of a core insight: that true progress requires a transgression of the frontier of science controlled by funding agencies. If the implementation of creative ideas all the way along the path towards useful and effective innovation goes beyond the horizon of political imagination (as often the case among bureaucrats in a small country with state-governed agencies) neither “adequate interdisciplinary training” (Health Care’s Voyage) nor “willingness to challenge the dogma” may be sufficient to melt the ice. Crucially, the recognition and inclusion of new modes of creative cognition are needed to enable crossdisciplinary fertilization. As the value for society of the products of a great inventive mind (epitomized by Langer’s bio) is measured in terms of their usefulness to human quality of life it is by no means surprising if the sources of inspiration need to originate from domains outside strictly scientific disciplines. Here comes the option to enrich scientific thinking by experiencing arts and culture and to learn to understand the sociology of values that build human societies.
One surprising conclusion from Transdisciplinary Dialogues with Nobel Laureates in 2001 was the emphasis on their concern and deep involvement in the cultural roots that had nurtured them and provided them with the tools of imagination and creative processing until the moment of their key discovery. Science evolving in society thus seems to share roots with the origin of creative cognition in a more distinct way than is generally recognized.
Technologic advances may well depend more on a permissive context of cultural environment than intradisciplinary self-breeding. The challenge invites sociology of sciences to work towards better solutions of its primary task - and to rethink forms and processes to allow more of transdisciplinary and crossfaculty integration: How to overcome the thwarting influence of anemic abstractions in the conceptual framework of administrators whose experiential competence have been distorted by political bias?

Robert Langer's learning on the limits of conventional wisdom is actually universal and applies to social engineering area as well, where conventional wisdom or rather the 'wisdom of crowds' have fallen prey to information cascades.

In the infinite world of apathy to take the unconventional step, the one which does not have a history of success is the one that is more likely to work; but for the herds, who want to stick together in good times and bad times, we have a deluge of abnormal good and abnormal bad, as equally likely possibilities.

It is clear to me that especially in medicine, the difference between a specialist and a bad student is dramatic, and can have dramatic consequences.

In an economic context, we are just learning that some variables are 'conscious', and some paradigms exponential. What Dr. Langer seems to be saying is that it is the same way in medicine. That sounds profound and encouraging. Perhaps someone should develop a general rule of medicine that affects research developments. Perhaps there is one. And maybe some conservatives are reacting to philosophy, and not medical or business practice.

The conclusion of the article is very exciting and it can actually offer a glimmer of hope for all of us stuck in the depth of the ongoing and deepening global crisis.
We seem to have concluded that evolution, ever changing existential conditions do not apply to modern humans, thus all our discoveries, inventions, our main body of knowledge is good enough to provide the basis for our ongoing existence.
As the article rightly suggests at the same time the cutting edge of classical research "quietly" pushed, and still pushing the boundaries of our perception of reality, and especially through the prisms of quantum physics, and the various quantum theories many of our long held dogmas started to break down. And this even within the same framework we have been researching so far.
The global crisis, that goes way beyond economics, politics or finances, basically engulfing our whole present human system is a good example of it, when previous, seemingly perfectly suitable, working methods and tools have become obsolete, moreover destructive.
Today most of human invented, created institutions are slipping through our fingers and while we try to use, and reuse all previously know and refined solutions instead of improvements we get worse states. This is all because the conditions of the system we exist in have changed, almost none of the conditions we based our previous lifestyle on remained intact.
The definition for the state of mind the last paragraph of the article points at is "faith above reason".
This is very different from the definition "faith" as it is normally used.
"Faith below reason" is a state when we ignore common sense and stubbornly believe in something that has no known natural foundations, but we choose to believe in it against reason for traditional, cultural, religious reasons.
"Faith within reason" is the usual, classical, dogmatic scientific approach, when we only believe in what we can grasp, evaluate and prove within our resent framework, with our present mind.
"Faith above reason" is the state when we examine, fully understand where we are, what is available within the present framework, but the available data, while on one hand proving the deadlock within the present framework points at a possibility solving the problem "above reason" using a different "state of mind".
To achieve that possibility requires a "leap of faith" but not fully blindly, but based on how we know for fact that with our present mind we cannot solve our present situation, and solution can only come by "changing our present mind to a new one".
"Faith above reason" is only possible after the full, honest, maximally precise examination of the present state, understanding the futility of the present state, understanding the necessity of changing the observer's point of view, starting anew.
The whole of humanity stands at this stage today, we have to fully understand where we are, why we have arrived here into this dead end, how we simply cannot solve our present crisis with our previous and present methods and tools, and we have to embark on a new discovery in "faith above reason", changing ourselves, the observers first.

New Comment

Pin comment to this paragraph

After posting your comment, you’ll have a ten-minute window to make any edits. Please note that we moderate comments to ensure the conversation remains topically relevant. We appreciate well-informed comments and welcome your criticism and insight. Please be civil and avoid name-calling and ad hominem remarks.

Log in/Register

Please log in or register to continue. Registration is free and requires only your email address.

Log in

Register

Emailrequired

PasswordrequiredRemember me?

Please enter your email address and click on the reset-password button. If your email exists in our system, we'll send you an email with a link to reset your password. Please note that the link will expire twenty-four hours after the email is sent. If you can't find this email, please check your spam folder.