Prenumerera

To me it is natural to defend Jyllandspostens right to publish what ever they like (called freedom of speech which should not be violated). At the same time it is natural to state that the publication was wrong. The reason for this is that it seems to be an expression of islamofobia rather than an expression of opinions. However they are still in their right to do it.

Muslims around the world is of course in their right to object to the publication and/or the message. They are also in their right to demonstrate, boycott and burn flags. This is within their freedom of speech which I will defend.

They are however not entitled to threat anyone with violence or of course actually commit violent acts. The latter is undefendable.

Everyone has their own interpretation on freedom of speech. If you can express your freedom of speech by doing smthing forbidden by one’s religion why can’t they express their freedom of speech by threat or anything else which is considered ”undefendable” by you. (Note: Islam forbid its followers to draw picture of the Prophet and no Moslem has ever done that). So, Who are you to tell who entitle to do what. Basically its no brainer thing, dont disturb the bee if you dont want to get stung. Just take care of each other.

Everyone has their own interpretation on freedom of speech. If A can express A’s freedom of speech by doing smthing forbidden by B’s religion, then why can’t B express their freedom of speech by threat or anything else which is considered “undefendable” by you. (Note: Islam forbid its followers to draw picture of the Prophet and no Moslem has ever done that). So, Who are you to tell who entitle to do what. Basically its no brainer thing, dont disturb the bee if you dont want to get stung. Just take care of each other.