Saturday, September 17, 2016

The Roman Catholic Church is very good at self-promotion. Their regular announcing of "saints" is part of their efforts to inject themselves into the consciousness of the ordinary man and woman and make themselves seem important as "God's judges" on earth.

Such pronouncements also shows the immense hubris and lack of self-awareness this organization possesses.

The idea that such a greedy and controlling political enterprise as the Roman Catholic Church is in a position to recognize "saints", and promote them to being "above" the ordinary human and thereby closer to God, beggars belief, and is quite laughable when looked at unemotionally!

Still, the corrupt media is happy to repeat their pronouncements, as if they mean anything, and the charade of "saints" continues on!

“Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.” Matthew 18

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

The key to political power is owning the global thought space and injecting your preferred narrative into it. This is why gaining control of the messages coming out of the mass media and respected institutions is so important to those seeking power over mankind.

Thankfully, the internet, a somewhat democratic medium, has thrown a spanner in their works by allowing stories that don't suit the power elite's agenda to circulate widely.

However, danger lies in the concentration of power on the internet, particularly by Google and Facebook, which provides the opportunity to direct inquiry into approved channels and to censor material deemed "offensive".

This is what the mainstream media has been doing all along and if the internet was to go down that path then we'd once again be limited to the views and opinions our would-be "masters" would prefer we held, rather than being exposed to a wide variety of opinions that don't necessarily suit the power elite's agenda for us to be exposed to and to hold.

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

The “emergence” of consciousness from the brain/body is (presumably) not magic, it just hasn’t been explained yet!

That’s assuming consciousness actually emerges from the brain. We don’t really know. It's certainly associated with brains, but whether brains are it's cause is anyone's guess! After all, consciousness cannot be seen, it can only be experienced! So maybe a tree or a rock is conscious. How would we know? It's not as if they can communicate the fact to us. At least not in a way commonly recognised!

Similarly, we are yet to explain how the universe "emerged" from nothingness, or God, or whatever word which we wish to give to that which apparently "caused" it.

"Does the body rule the mind, or does the mind rule the body? I dunno..." Morrissey

Many people will say that changes in body and particularly brain chemistry are the cause of our emotions (and every other experience a human can have). But is this full story?

The main evidence for chemistry being the originator of emotions is that if we alter brain chemistry- by taking MDMA (ecstasy), for example, we feel good and full of love. Therefore this suggests the feeling of love is purely chemical based.

But is this whole story?

If we watch a movie that makes a sad, is it brain chemicals making us sad or is it our interpretation of the movie that made us sad?

People will say: our interpretation of the movie is a purely biochemical event happening in the brain that leads to additional biochemical events which result in us feeling sad.

This seems fair, but where in the brain ca we say the interpretation occurred? Can we be sure such interpretation doesn't happen in a non-physical mind which is simultaneously reflected in changes in chemistry and electrical signals in the body? We cannot.

Clearly, chemical changes in the body can affect subjective awareness but so does subjective awareness affect bodily biochemistry. Causation seems to flow both ways. I understand many people in the modern age enamoured with physicalism like to view everything as flowing from the physical but do we really know this is true?

I would suggest that generally it is the "non-physical" mind that is the driver of emotions and that more rarely the introduction of chemicals or strong electromagnetic fields that are the causative factor.

In the eyes of some materialists
consciousness is an illusion.
But if consciousness is an illusion
does that mean everything in consciousness
is also an illusion?

For example, the world exists within consciousness,
therefore if consciousness is an illusion
then so is the world?

If consciousness is an illusion
but the body is real
(although we only know it exists
because it appears in consciousness)
then does that means thoughts and emotions are also illusions?

If we place primary (or solitary) focus on the physical
then we could say all subjective experience is illusion.
Thoughts, feelings, dreams, visualizations...
all illusions.
Even though it is these things that give rise to behaviors
that impact on the material world.

For example, a man visualizes a building in his mind.
Nowhere does this building exist in the physical world
only in the man's mind.
He goes about designing this building and then gives this design
to builders who build according to the design.
Now we have a physical building resembling the visualization
the man held in his mind.

So which is "more" real:
the visualization or the physical building?

Which of the two can be studied by science:
the visual image in the man's head
or the building made out of wood, steel and hempcrete?

A scientist does an MRI of the mans's head while we is visualizing the building.
Does the scientist see the building?
The scientists sees a representation of the man's brain
with certain area showing more activity than others.
These areas showing greatest activity are said to relate
to the man's visual capacity.
Does this mean these areas of activity are the building?

How does the man's consciousness know to interpret these areas of brain activity
as a building and not as something else?

Are we even close to answering that question?

Do we really know diddly about how the brain and consciousness relate?

Regulatory capture is a form of government failure that occurs when a regulatory agency, created to act in the public interest, instead advances the commercial or political concerns of special interest groups that dominate the industry or sector it is charged with regulating.

When regulatory capture occurs the interests of firms or political groups are prioritised over the interests of the public, leading to a net loss to society as a whole. Government agencies suffering regulatory capture are called "captured agencies".

We need to bear in mind than many people report enhanced states of awareness during near death experiences, when brain function is reduced to sometimes unmeasurably low levels. That is, they feel their experience is more real during the NDE, when brain function is minimal, that during daily life when it’s functioning normally.

This suggests the brain may be more of an inhibitor to awareness than its creator. This supports the view of many spiritualists, who hold that we are more conscious when the spirit leaves the physical body than when it’s ensconced within it.

Saturday, August 13, 2016

The soul or self should not be a slave to serve the physical realm; rather the physical realm should serve the self. That means the creations of social structures that serve to liberate the individual rather than enslave them.

In other words, the soul should not have to become a slave to a social machine to have the needs of the body met. Additionally, laws should not exist which demand the individual cow-tow to a system designed to enslave them. That means no military draft and no compulsory schooling either!

Thursday, August 11, 2016

The “drug war” is one of those clever facades created by dark forces to distract from its real purpose which is:

(1) to fund criminal networks that feed vast sums of untraceable money into the shadow government (the power elite, the cabal, the NWO, Illuminati, etc.), and,

(2) to create negativity and fear (which the shadow government feeds on), more broadly, throughout the community.

It could be argued that most, if not all wars, concocted by the US government have a similar purpose. The “war on terror” channels vast sums from the public purse into the military-industrial complex and the “war on cancer” channels vast sums into the medico-insurance-pharmaceutical industries apparently controlled by secret government players.

This shows the power than can be gained by controlling government policy. It enables the vast transfer of public wealth into the hands of the few who control the various corporations that are form the military-industrial complex.

Another advantage of the drug war for the power elite is that it enables them to outlaw products that could compete with their own highly profitable ones. For example, industrial hemp production is banned in the USA as a result of the drug war (although hemp is not a drug just a relative of the cannabis plant) to enable chemical products, which it would compete with, to flourish.

This is just one example of how unhealthy, petrochemical-based chemical products are promoted at the expense of the well-being of the population and the planet. And the list goes on and on. Basically, petrochemical based products, which can generally be patented and generate super-normal profits, are promoted, at the expense of natural products which cannot be patented and cannot generate super-normal profits for the power elite. It is a sick game that these people have gotten away with for too long and it is time to put an end to it!

One of the powerful ways society is controlled is by "taboo creation".

This may not stop all people thinking of a certain topic but it will stop most people expressing it.

And when something is not openly expressed it becomes unknown and disbelieved by the majority of the population!

And when it is expressed, it is openly vilified by the people and forces that wish to control our minds due to their own fears and their desire to big note themselves and gain acceptance among their ignorant peers!

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Considering hemp is one of the most useful plants known to man, the banning of its large scale (industrial) farming is a sign of the deep level of political corruption at play in our world.

Industrial hemp, though related to the cannabis sativa plant, doesn't have the drug component of that plant, and so it's banning cannot be considered part of the failed, duplicitous "war on drugs". Instead, its' banning is clearly a corrupt move to protect environmentally and socially unsound chemical production industries and the profits they provide to the greedy and immoral "1%".

To vote any political leader in who doesn't support the full legalization of hemp is to vote in a corrupt candidate who is no friend of the people, only a friend of the "1%". This should be made abundantly clear by those with a voice to express it, as loudly as possible!

The clock is ticking and the Earth and its' people can't afford to continue to cow-tow to the greedy, corrupt 1%, who have been only pursuing their own interests for decades now, and are willing to destroy the earth and its' people to achieve them.

Saturday, July 30, 2016

A lot of burning of unwanted vegetation goes on in the countryside, here in Australia, and probably around the world.

Heaven forbid the vegetation should be left to provide habitat for animals and insects, to enrichen and help structure the soil, and to generally improve the local environment!

I guess it's just too "untidy" for the anally retentive minds of the property owners to handle. Everything must look like a lifeless 1950's suburban yard. So as a result we get a lifeless, boring environment that is hostile to life and the air full of sickening smoke, just so some tight asses can have a "tidy" property!

Friday, February 26, 2016

The government needs to be more powerful than any one (or group of) corporations, colluding with each other.

Of course, much of the existing political process in America is influenced by corporations and wealthy and powerful individuals, to an extent which effectively makes much of the government an extension of the corporate world rather than a servant of the public.