Go to page

presenter

PAOK and Xanthi's expulsion from the championship was decided by the ESA at its meeting on Monday (27/1) that ended on the occasion of Olympiacos' complaint.

The suggestion-bomb of the Professional Sport Committee was voted 3-2 and accordingly, it was decided to revoke the bicep certificate for the multi-ownership case and the acronym for its shareholder list.

Given that the ESA's contributions are usually binding, since this is a government committee that is essentially examining and issuing certificates of participation, like the EPO Licensing Committee, the championship is in the air.

It is recalled that a few days ago the EPO Licensing Committee imposed a heavy fine on Xanthi when it examined its case.

However, the final decision will be made by the Super League Primary Discipline. There will be follow-up to the PAOK and Xanthi series, with developments and reactions expected.

This is a finding of the ESA's audit, which will be forwarded to the competent committee, that is, the Super League sports judge who will be called upon to either certify or revoke the (binding) decision of the Professional Sports Committee.

It is worth noting that the vote on the violations found was 4-1, while the penalty was 3-2, which means there was a "derby".

Undersecretary of Sports, Lefteris Avgenakis, said via his Twitter account:

IFC # 9 Champion 2012-13, V-Bookie Champion 2008

The party of impressions that attempted to set up "red-white" circles, with the co-owner of PAOK with her PA Xanthi, it is coming to an end, and those who are inspired will soon have to deal with what has been hurting them in recent years and is no more than within the four lines of the results.

Waiting for her decision Committee on Professional SportIt is worth taking a look at Nikolaos Tzoulakis' biography. Mr. Tzoulakis has previously served for three years as Chairman of the Appeals Appeals Committee. Between his terms in Crete and Syros, and the dozens of cases he was called upon to handle, the Honorable Attorney General of Appeals has been a negative protagonist of judicial developments several times.

And despite facing heavy complaints, Mr. Tzoulakis was eventually acquitted. It was January 2006 when then Crete Court of Appeals prosecutor Nikolaos Tzoulakis filed for five hours before then-Attorney Arios Pagos G. Sanidas on suspicion of bribery and breach of duty, inter alia.. In fact, the prosecutor who set the record for his stay in Chania, touching 20 years in the same city, allegedly missed that promotion period following allegations of unlawful conduct.

Serious findings were uncovered after a sweeping search of the judges and prosecutors, as more than 200 were alleged to have either concealed important assets or failed to file statements of negligence.

In fact, Mr Tzoulakis had also been placed on a temporary holiday on the case where he was sued, while he was charged with a difference of 25 million drachmas in the statement, which he attributed to his wife's financial assets that he did not know, as they were acquired by her at a time when their relationship was not good and they didn't stay together.

Four years after the first complaints, the Supreme Court decided to allow Mr Tzoulakis to remain in the public prosecutor's office, overwhelmingly rejecting his request for dismissal due to his name being implicated in pre-trial cases. Attorneys in Themidos Melathron report that at that time a prominent Supreme Court prosecutor spoke of "unfair targeting of judges" and "persecution with precarious and inflated evidence".

The cases brought against Mr. Tzoulakis involved two alleged interventions by judges and health officials to facilitate his acquaintances, but also to influence two judges in related cases. He had argued that he had simply asked for expedited decisions, as there were complaints of delays. "Interventions are exaggerations related to my targeting," he allegedly said. One of the cases in which he was accused of intervening, however, concerned the facilitation of an accused driver in a fatal car accident who was working at a friend's business, a claim which he also categorically denied.

IFC # 9 Champion 2012-13, V-Bookie Champion 2008

The 5 members present at the final session and final recommendation of the ESA, normally should have been 7, as in the first meetings in January, with one member not already invited for today's meeting.

A big scandal has emerged today from the final suggestion of the EEA to expel PAOK and Xanthi from the league, with EEA members ultimately voting 3-2 against both Superleague teams.

However, one member of the Commission, Konstantinos Mantaios, was not notified of attending today's meeting, so he was obviously missing the final vote he had made and the suggestion for expulsion from the PAOK and Xanthi championships.

IFC # 9 Champion 2012-13, V-Bookie Champion 2008

Lefteris Avgenakis, who appointed the new members and President Tzoulakis to the ESA, in a statement on social media, stressed that he respected the EPO's authority and kept distance from the suggestion.

A few days before the first meetings of the ESA for 2020, Lefteris Avgenakis replaced the chairman of the committee, but also two of its members, people who today voted in favor of the removal of PAOK and Xanthi from the Superleague 1 championship.

And after all this upheaval with the scandalous suggestion made by the committee on PAOK and Xanthi, the deputy minister himself, who appointed Piraeus President, Mr. Tzoulakis, through his official Twitter account, commented:

"The government respects the self-government of Greek football and the judgment of the professional sports committee. In any case, it is not possible to impose the most onerous punishment of relegation to historical teams without complete documentation."

We are now waiting for the next official reactions from the Deputy Minister ...

IFC # 9 Champion 2012-13, V-Bookie Champion 2008

PAOK PA responded to the suggestion of the Professional Sports Committee via an official announcement on paokfc.gr, with "arrows" against Lefteris Avgenakis for the role he played, saying:

"The ESA's suggestion is a memorial to enslavement of its - supposedly - functionaries to the orders of its political boss. Mr. Avgenakis proved to be the representative of the Olympiacos press office setting up a case whose sole purpose was to tarnish PAOK's history. which finally put an end to Olympiacos' nonsense.

From today we lift the glove that Lefteris Avgenakis threw and we demand the Prime Minister to remove it immediately. It is dangerous to sport, to the cohesion of the country and to the fun.

The bubble he set up with Vangelis Marinakis will pop into their own face. Not to forget that they tried several times to exterminate PAOK and in every attempt they found themselves deeper into the mud.

Soon your dream of seeing PAOK on the ground will become a nightmare! "

IFC # 3 Cup & Super Cup winner 2011-12

But not realizing that the supposed law that saves PAOK is 100% deposed to save the fat and his team from the mud, sorry but then it's clinically retarded.

Also, the fans of the other teams you are joking about are doing well in part but I hope you understand that the year that your team will claim the championship will pull itself out of the thick of it.

That is exactly the point and thank you for asking. I have so many thousands of posts here and you still don't know which team I support. Unlike some others who get bored every day.
Terrible argument with the championships of the past 10 years. Gagatsis would have liked it too.
In terms of age, whether I'm 5 years old or 55 years old, it doesn't matter.
Thank you for your time

IFC # 9 Champion 2012-13, V-Bookie Champion 2008

That is exactly the point and thank you for asking. I have so many thousands of posts here and you still don't know which team I support. Unlike some others who get bored every day.
Terrible argument with the championships of the past 10 years. Gagatsis would have liked it too.
In terms of age, whether I'm 5 years old or 55 years old, it doesn't matter.
Thank you for your time

IFC # 9 Champion 2012-13, V-Bookie Champion 2008

The tragic political manipulations of Mr. Avgenakis and the government lead Greek football into chaos.

The "Vassiliadis Law" (4603/19) provides in its provisions on the Committee on Professional Sport (SEN) and in particular in Article 4 (par. 2) that "the members of the Board Regularly and alternatively, they are appointed by decision of the Minister of Culture and Sport, which is published in the Government Gazette, subject to the agreement of the Standing Committee on Educational Affairs of the Hellenic Parliament, in accordance with paragraph 5. Rule 32 of the Rules of Procedure of the House. "

Mr. Avgenakis, in order to avoid the suffering of public debate over his choices and to have complete control and without the possibility of surprises, chose not to apply the existing legal framework that ensured transparency and did not change its composition to the competent authority. House committee.

Thus, Mr. Avgenakis fraudulently misled the Parliament, stating that the Commission would continue its mandate, and immediately afterwards replaced its members.

This action itself raises unanswered questions and shadows. Mr. Avgenakis's manipulations, then, are the ones that led to the complete impasse we are in today. It is therefore necessary to explain what is the purpose of circumventing the law, or the feasibility of replacing EEA members without the approval of the House Committee on Education.

IFC # 5 champion 2008-09, IFC # 4 Cup & Super Cup winn

Solves the question WHY DOES THE PRESIDENT INCLUDE A COMMITTEE TO A CORRUPTIONED MAN?

Corrupt because he was accused of something justified / not convicted ... OK ... Whatever you say ... And he was not appointed lately .... He has been here for 6 months .... You got a certificate from him ...

Solves the question of why TWO COMMITTEE CHANGES?

Yes ... A member was appointed after resignation from previous months ... No one was prosecuted ...

It solves the query because NO ONE OF THE OBJECTIVE SITES READING SHOULD DO ANYTHING ABOUT MY MARINAK'S MORNING WHILE YOU ACCEPT THESE OBJECTIVES

No matter ... The day after the trial, IF it proves IF the one ...

And with the new law, it almost saves it !!!

Why is he saving her? AN AND AN AND AN ...... Does he own the other team? You're confused ...

Dude KUTOCHORTO IN THIS COUNTRY EATS 90% OF GREEKS ....

SOMEBODY BELONGS TO 10% .....

RESPECT FROM THIS 10% .... (WHICH MAY BE INSIDE ...)

You're offended ... I'm not trying to convince anyone ... I put an interview on it and let everyone come to its conclusions ... And of course ANYTHING to post on door 7 or Vangelas with a clear and identifiable payoff with his views He did it ... Do you understand it ...

THIRD YEAR THAT GOES NOT TO TAKE A CHAMPIONSHIP '' THE STATE IS THE OLYMPIC '' AND HAVE HEALTHY !!!!

Well-Known Member

But not realizing that the supposed law that saves PAOK is 100% deposed to save the fat and his team from the mud, sorry but then it's clinically retarded.

Also, the fans of the other teams you are joking about are doing well in part but I hope you understand that the year that your team will claim the championship will pull itself out of the thick of it.

That's what I thought yesterday. As if starting with PAOK any team that threatens the league with the league from the Olympics, will eat relegation or at least under the new provision will lose the league on the cards.

PS I will not talk to anyone who supports Olympiacos, because he simply remembers what he wants to remember and not what he should remember. Did Olympiacos ever have any branches or no? So don't bother, I won't answer anyone.

presenter

The government has intervened and amended a law on penalties for its infringement, favoring an SA or a private entity and even with retroactive effect. This is not until the opinion of an independent authority reaches the competent court that would adjudicate and possibly convict the SA or the individual concerned. (Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think in general these are the facts, maybe too brief).

Seeing it without the words PAOK, Xanthi, Olympiacos, EEA, Greek Championship, relegation but also Marinakis, Savvidis etc, isn't the previous one created a bit scary? Think only of cases involving other independent authorities, such as the Data Protection Authority, the Competition Commission, ASEP, the Ombudsman.

Maybe I can tragic things, but I'm definitely not the only one - some rushed to predict as well as actual f ... ing civilization!

Share this page

About us

The infobeto community is considered a meeting point for gamers and people in the gambling market for consultations, advice, updates, information exchange, problem solving with companies, etc. We are proud to have the largest gaming forum in Greece and one of the world's largest and we work daily to keep the level of our community high.