Short answer: yes.he will make the team if he continues to do what he does and has been. ARedd might push him a bit but itd take a lot to supplant him.

PS imo is not an option. With rb needy teams out there I dont suspect theud miss all his tape and not snatch him up n Thompson might make the PS and I fear my boy Royster has his days numbered. Sucks we cant make a deal w anyone sincenwebhave so much talent ar rb we will be "giving" players away on the dinal cut.

Do you get a bonus based on the number of threads you start? Obviously anyone following camp knows he has a good chance. No, he's not a lock. But does he have a "chance?" Obviously. Seriously, this thread is silly.

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Proverb: Failure is not falling down. Failure is not getting up again

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way

We'll have to see how he does in the 2nd or 3rd quarter of some preseason games, but if continues to play like he did against New England, there is no way he doesn't claim a spot.

Remember, in 2012 a lot of us were wondering if Alfred Morris was going to the practice squad or if he was just too good and needed to be put on the roster. Then he was our starter. If you show up and play, the coaches are going to find room for you on the team.

"I’m never under the assumption that you draft for need. You draft the best available football player on the board. ... Because, in the long run, they are the ones who will help you win the most games." - Scot McCloughan

I think Seastrunk has to prove he can catch the ball out the backfield and pass protect still.. gotta remember he has very little experience with catching passes and is working on it in camp and on top of that has to prove he can pass protect... granted he looked great against the Pats you gotta put in perspective when he played .. he was behind Redd on the depth chart so that means he prob is behind in a lot of important areas when it comes to making the team.. I am sure he will get a chance to play a little earlier going forward but Im curious to see when and who he comes in after going forward

WHEN he came in is subjective. We dont know if Redd is ahead or behindbhim on the depth chart. Maybe they through Redd in first thinking he NEEDED the challenge of better opposition and that Seastrunk jus needed reps.

Its a moot point im just saying a lot goes on innpreseason games that will not make sense to fans. I look forward to seeing more of him and the first depth chart release

Gruden thinks just like me .. Clearly I should be a head coach in the NFL haha.. Very much just joking but it goes with my point about Seastrunk but I have nothing against him just don't think he is worthy of a roster spot YET.. I think he is best served on practice squad but a lot can change with 3 more preseason games