Saturday, 3 December 2016

Jill Stein's recoutn - 12/02/2016

Stan
Vaughan was a candidate in Nevada’s assembly district 15, who has
huge proof of fraud in his district. It’s the Democrat kind that
involves falsified, non-existent voters who somehow still managed to
cast votes. In 9,200 instances, the persons supposedly registered to
vote don’t live at the address provided, as verified by Mr.
Vaughan’s clever idea to send an individual piece of mail to
registrations in which he had reasons to question their validity. Las
Vegas, and the State of Nevada, at a minimum have a huge problem but
it’s likely much larger than that.

He
conducted a random check of 200 of the registrants whose mail was
returned by the US Post Office as being invalid and found that 185 of
them still voted. If that factor of 92.5% fraudulent voting is
extended out to the 9,200 pieces of returned mail, there were 8,510
fraudulent votes cast in Mr. Vaughan’s district.

As
bad as that is, the problem is much worse. Mr. Vaughan has the
Election Department cumulative daily voter turnout rolls in which
some serious and impossible anomalies were found to exist. Through
November 2nd the reports indicated that 10,000 people in his district
had voted and as of two days later another 2,466 had voted. However,
1,900 votes by independents, 3rd party and non-partisan voters
disappeared in that two day period of time.

At
the same time another 3,200 increase in Democrat turnout was
registered while 1,000 Republicans are shown to have voted. The total
number of votes recorded during that two day period was 2, 466.
There’s no way the number of votes cast could have decreased
without fraud being involved and the totals simply don’t match up.
Somebody is monkeying with the system and generating 180% voter
turnout as well.

“Edward
Snowden, Willie Nelson, Waylon Jennings and dozens of movie stars
were registered to vote and when Mr. Vaughan attempted to vote
for himself he
was informed that he had already voted. Others reported a similar
experience and all were given provisional ballots which would only be
counted if the vote total was within 1%.

Provided
the Democrats were able to maintain a cushion of 1% in their
fraudulent vote levels, his and many other American votes are never
counted, effectively nullified by the Democrats, including what are
surely many illegal aliens.

President-elect Trump lost the state by
only 27,000 votes. The fraud exposed by Mr. Vaughan represents
roughly a third of that number, in just one small district
representing 1/42 of the state’s voters.

Sorry,
Newsmax didn’t set the video for embedding so you’ll need to
click this link to
watch it.

Hillary
Clinton scores HUGE success in Wisconsin recount! After a full day
recount Hillary gained ONE vote on Trump

After
the first full day of recounting the votes and adding up the
tally, Hillary
Clinton gained a single vote on Donald Trump. Yes,
all the fuss and money directed by Jill Stein, towards recounting
votes in three US states that Trump won, has resulted in a single
vote difference.

The
result of the Wisconsin recount will prove to be extremely close to
the already certified count that gave Trump the state…which will
also certify Jill Stein’s demise and demotion into the history
books as a useful idiot for Hillary Clinton’s never ending
sore losing tirade.

Trump
defeated Clinton in Wisconsin’s
initial tally by
about one percent, or just over 22,000 votes. Nevertheless, Green
Party candidate Jill Stein (who finished a very distant fourth) is
demanding a full recount after suggesting fraud or technological
glitches may have swayed the results.

But
the first results to emerge suggest the final tally will be rather
close to the original one. Only Menominee County, home to the
Menominee Indian Reservation, fully reported its recounted results on
the first day. It found 17 extra votes for Stein and 12 for
Libertarian Gary Johnson, while removing two votes from Trump and one
from Clinton.

When
putting all the results together, that means the first day of the
recount narrowed the gap between Clinton and Trump by
just a single vote.

At
her current pace, Clinton will overtake Trump in Wisconsin in
approximately 74 and a half years. Unfortunately, the recount is
expected to last just two weeks.

A
judge in Montgomery County Pennsylvania decided
that it is time for Jill Stein to end her recount effort, and fade
away into obscurity with her reputation now fully tarnished and
corrupted by Hillary Clinton.

After
hearing arguments from attorneys representing Jill Stein’s campaign
and the Montgomery County Board of Elections, Judge Bernard A. Moore
dismissed the petitions of voters in 78 precincts to recount votes or
forensically analyze voting machines due a lack of evidence and
improperly filed petitions.

The
Times Herald of
Montgomery County reports on what should be the end of Jill Stein’s
useless and reckless recount push…

“What
we keep going back to is that our voting machines are not connected
to the internet,” said
board of elections Solicitor Nicole Forzato. “Montgomery
County takes great, great pride in being concerned about its
infrastructure for IT generally, and they have gone through a
vigorous process to make sure our technology general, including voter
services technology and the voting machines are safe and secure to
use.”

The
judge did not give an explanation of his dismissal, but objections
made by Forzato focused on two areas: first, that there was
insufficient evidence to suggest that the machines had been tampered
with in any way and second, that the petitions were not filed
properly with the proper fees.

Stein
campaign attorney Ilann Maazel argued that voting machines throughout
Pennsylvania were vulnerable to hacking. He stated that the effort to
request a recount or analysis of the machines was to make sure every
vote was counted.

“We
know that Donald Trump won the vote of machines in Pennsylvania. We
want to know who won the vote of the people,” Maazel
said.

Maazel
also argued that the manner in which the petitions were filed,
county-by-county and district-by-district, was a result of
“byzantine” election statutes in the commonwealth.

“They’re
requiring fees that don’t exist, they are proposing deadlines that
don’t exist,” Maazel
said.“The
Republican Party is saying that over 27,000 people in 9,000 districts
have to request a recount or there can’t be a recount
anywhere. What
kind of system is that? That is a disgrace.”

Jill
Stein when on the liberal friendly, anti-Trump, show “The View”
to try and keep her (and Hillary’s) election circus live.

Meanwhile
Tucker Carlson takes on Jill Stein’s campaign manager, David Cobb,
over her efforts to initiate a recount in multiple states.

The
Pennsylvania ruling is not shocking given that even Jill Stein
admitted there was “no
evidence of fraud at the ballot box.”

Zerohedge
reported yesterday that
Jill Stein was also defeated in a Wisconsin court for failing to
present any credible evidence of vote tampering.

While
this should come as a shock to precisely no one other than some
disaffected Hillary supporters who were hoping for a miracle, Jill
Stein’s request for a full “hand recount” in the state of
Wisconsin has officially been denied by
Dane County Circuit Judge Valerie Bailey-Rihn. According to
the StarTribune,
the request was denied after the judge found that Stein failed
to show any mistakes or irregularities that would bring a machine
recount into question.

A
Wisconsin judge has refused to order local officials to conduct the
state’s presidential recount by hand.

Green
Party presidential candidate Jill Stein requested the recount last
week. She alleged — without evidence — that the state’s voting
equipment may have been hacked.

The
state Elections Commission has ordered the recount to begin Thursday
but rejected Stein’s request that county clerks conduct the recount
entirely by hand. Stein filed a lawsuit seeking an order for a
statewide hand recount.

Stein’s
attorneys argued during a hearing Tuesday evening that the best way
to determine if a cyberattack occurred is to check ballots by hand
against electronic tabulations from Election Day. State lawyers
countered there’s no evidence to suggest any attack took place.

Dane
County Circuit Judge Valerie Bailey-Rihn refused to issue the order,
saying Stein’s
team failed to show any mistakes or irregularities