My dictionary
says “elite” means the group or part of a group selected or regarded as
the best, finest, most distinguished, and most powerful. I submit that
members of the new world order or world government clique should not be
characterized by such a complimentary term. Many of them are or have been
extremely wealthy. Some may be attractive. Others may be in personable
and popular. Quite a few hold high political office. A good many are born
to comfort and privilege There may even be a few among them who are IQ
gifted, but in no way can they be regarded as the best, finest, most distinguished
and most powerful.

Those
who wish to establish a new world order to destroy our national sovereignty
and independence are merely followers of a destructive concept that has
become the dominating idea controlling their minds and their lives. They
are group dependent. They are not truth seekers or independent thinkers.
They are weak charactered subservient followers who need to be involved
in group goals to give them identity. They are cowards who dare not face
the future unless it is totally planned and systematized. And they are
bullies who gang up to tear down whatever is not according to the concept
that controls them. In government they are untrustworthy workers who use
any advantages to work against those they are supposed to serve. Elite
does NOT define them.

Nor
is “liberal” a good description. There is nothing liberal about forcing
everyone into a worldwide management system that deprives individuals
of the ability to make constructive choices in matters directly affecting
their own lives. There is nothing liberal about requiring that all decisions
be considered to be group decisions. There is nothing liberal about schooling
little children in group conformity rather than training them in self
control and teaching them a love of virtue and truth.

The
world shapers are neither elite nor liberal, but they are united in a
common purpose. There should be an accurate and understandable term to
define their goals and identify the promoters and participants.

Fortunately
there is no need to make up a term or coin a word. That was done more
than a century and one half ago by Auguste Comte. Comte (1798-1857) was
a French mathematician/philosopher who devoted his entire intellectual
life to developing plans for a system of world unity and control. He called
his world system a SOCIOCRACY. Those who supported his philosophy or worked
with him to promote controlled unity he called SOCIOCRATS.

Sociocracy
has its own religion which Comte called SOCIOLATRY, POSITIVISM, or the
RELIGION OF HUMANITY. The object of worship is SOCIETY conceived of as
a collective female entity. In SOCIOLATRY, and religions based on sociolatry,
there is but one sin--separation. Separation is the only sin.

Comte
declared that studying social behavior in order to combine, classify,
claim, and control life on earth was to become a science which he called
SOCIOLOGY or SOCIAL SCIENCE. Comte considered sociology to be necessary
as the systematic base for sociocracy and sociolatry. According to his
planning SOCIOLOGISTS were gradually to become the intellectual monitors,
political planners, economic regulators, spiritual leaders, and moral
teachers of a sociocratic world system.

In his
System of Positive Polity Comte wrote:

1.
The only real life is the collective life of the race; individual life
has no existence except as an abstraction. SPP, Vol. I, P202

2.
When the system is fully regulated, the effect of this will be to secure
greater unity by diminishing the influence of personal character. SPP,
Vol. II, P. 237

3.
The requisite convergence of the best minds cannot be obtained without
voluntary renunciation on the part of most of them, of their sovereign
right to free inquiry. Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, Translated
by Harriet Martineau, George Bell, London, 1896, Vol. II., P. 170.

Now,
after more than 150 years sociocracy has progressed to a remarkable extent.
Sociocrats are found in every country, in every race, in every social
or economic grouping, every occupation or profession, in every religion
and political party, in every school or college, and among those who call
themselves liberal and also those who call themselves conservative.

Sociocrats
seek control of emotion, thought, and action. They make decisions according
to plan, play on the emotions of groups, propose legislation, and then
take action to enforce their decisions. If they cannot get legislators
to vote in their favor, they use judges to rule in their favor. Flattery,
bribery and deceit are among their methods. If these do not succeed sociocrats
are more than willing to use violence.

Have
you ever tried to say NO to a sociocrat? NO, I do not want my child sent
across town to another school. No, I do not want my child to have sex
education in school. NO I do not want government drug education. NO, I
do not want government medicine. NO, I do not want the government to form
partnerships with selected businesses. NO, I do not want the use of my
property to be limited by snakes and beetles. NO I do not want to be forced
to believe or have my child taught that all people must be equal. No,
I do not want to be told who I must hire and who I may fire. NO, I do
not want my money to be given to strangers without my permission. NO,
NO, NO---all to no avail.

Have
you ever gone to a city council meeting, state legislature or congress
to testify about proposed legislation? If one of the first questions you
are asked is: “Who do you represent?” you know that sociocrats are in
charge. Unless you claim to represent an activist group, you will be among
the last to testify and what you have to say will be ignored. You, as
an individual, are insignificant. No matter how true, sensible, or enlightened
your testimony--to sociocrats you are a nonentity. The father of sociology
intended to keep you from independent thinking and influence . He wrote:

4.
We must get rid of personality in every shape, even of the personality
of an imaginary being, if we would found a powerful and enduring discipline
in the name of humanity. SPP, Vol.IV.249.

Elite
and liberal are meaningless to most people. but the term “sociocrat” defines
and identifies world government advocates. It puts all who believe in
or support sociocracy into a single identifiable category. Whether they
be financial supporters, teachers, workers, corporate managers, women,
entertainers, elected officials, bureaucrats, media personalities, scientists,
physicians, nurses--whenever; if they believe in, or act to promote the
sociocratic new world order, they are sociocrats.

One
does not have to be above the average in intelligence to be at the upper
levels of the sociocratic hierarchy . The basic outlines of the entire
plan were laid out by Comte 150 years ago, and the plan is still being
followed. Comte’s writings provide detailed recipes for gaining control.

The
most important sociocratic characteristics are not intelligence and character,
but obedience and emotional vulnerability. According to Comte,

5.
It is the primary condition of social reorganization to put an end to
the state of utter revolt which the Intellect maintains against the Heart
. . . Positivism has at last overcome the immense difficulties of this
task. . . every part of our nature is brought under the regenerating influence
of the worship of Humanity.” SPP, Vol. I, P285.

6.
No one knows so well as the Positivist that the principal source of real
morality lies in direct exercise of our social sympathies, whether systematic
or spontaneous. He will spare no efforts to develope these sympathies
from the earliest years by every method which sound philosophy can indicate.
It is in this that moral education, whether private or public principally
consists; and to it mental education is always to be held subordinate.
SPP, Vol. I. P. 80.

7.
Education thus will from the beginning have its goal marked out for it,
and will thus never be wasted in useless academic studies. SPP, Vol. II.,
P. 299.

At present
curriculum in public schools is in the hands of sociocratic organizations.
Local school boards have little or nothing to say about what is being
taught. The sociocrats and sociologists are in charge. Your children and
grandchildren are in their hands. They are being taught the religion of
sociolatry and obedience to the vast worldwide sociocracy.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

How
can we call sociocrats elite and liberal when they are no such thing?
When informed writers, researchers teachers, and citizens use Comte’s
terms “sociocrat,” “sociocracy,” “sociolatry,” and “sociology” when referring
to the new world order promoters and its religion, rather than “elite”
or “liberal,” larger numbers of people will understand what is intended,
and be willing to learn what ought to be done to restore intelligence
and character to our public and private lives.

Erica Carle is an independent researcher and
writer. She has a B.S. degree from the University of Wisconsin. She has
been involved in radio and television writing and production, and has
also taught math and composition at the private school her children attended
in Brookfield, Wisconsin. For ten years she wrote a weekly column, "Truth
In Education" for WISCONSIN REPORT, and served as Education Editor for
that publication.

Those
who wish to establish a new world order to destroy our national sovereignty
and independence are merely followers of a destructive concept that has
become the dominating idea controlling their minds and their lives. They
are group dependent.