I echo Night_Wolf bro's words. You see, I'm playing with 14 players just because I was late visiting BC. You all had the advantage whereas I can't look at replacements. Dwayne Smith as an alrounder scored less than 50 in 5 games n I have no backup allrounder.Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Opera Mobile)

Originally Posted by Isnaad
I echo Night_Wolf bro's words. You see, I'm playing with 14 players just because I was late visiting BC. You all had the advantage whereas I can't look at replacements. Dwayne Smith as an alrounder scored less than 50 in 5 games n I have no backup allrounder.Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Opera Mobile)

Originally Posted by Isnaad
I echo Night_Wolf bro's words. You see, I'm playing with 14 players just because I was late visiting BC. You all had the advantage whereas I can't look at replacements. Dwayne Smith as an alrounder scored less than 50 in 5 games n I have no backup allrounder.Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Opera Mobile)

But that round had nothing to do with coming in late though. Remember, it was a free-for-all round. You could have come in at anytime you wanted to. You and T_E's issue was that you two both picked players from outside the list. T_E picked 2, so his other one had to go. You picked 3, and you already had 1 during regular draft. So all 3 had to go. IDK why you two picked that many outer players.

Ok, so the list was there and I picked from it. No one had any complaints when I declared my 17. Now you're asking me to give up one of my key bowlers in the middle of the tournament - how's that fair? You're thinking about the other GMs, but no one made a noise when the squads were finalized at the end of the draft. You can't ask me to change my strategy so drastically right before the P/O.Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Blackberry)

Originally Posted by AsifTheManRahman
Ok, so the list was there and I picked from it. No one had any complaints when I declared my 17. Now you're asking me to give up one of my key bowlers in the middle of the tournament - how's that fair? You're thinking about the other GMs, but no one made a noise when the squads were finalized at the end of the draft. You can't ask me to change my strategy so drastically right before the P/O.Posted via BC Mobile Edition (Blackberry)

No one, including yourself knew about this injury. Mainly because no one here checks the Afg news, I doubt anyone does. If they did, you wouldn't have had him at all or had to play with 16 players. He has been great for your team and helped you through to the playoffs. It's fair in a sense that while everyone else had to bench their injured players, big players too, such as Lee, Vettori, Gayle, Sanga but you had to chance to use Hamid. So it would be slightly fair for the other GMs if you don't have Hamid from here on. It's already more than fair on you because you already had the service of Hamim when you shouldn't have.

Once again it is my fault that this one got through under the radar. But if you can't take this then you are only holding it against me and not willing to accept my mistakes. Which is unfair on me.

Where's all the talk about the MLC not being a bogus administrative body like the ICC now? Hamid Hassan is perfectly fit now and yet he'll have to sit out - it doesn't make any sense. It's like doing two wrongs to try and make a right, just like the ICC. But two wrongs don't make a right. Again, not my fault that his injury was missed - if the other GMs had a problem they should have voiced their concerns BEFORE the end of the draft, not when I was on the brink of making it to the playoffs. You had a list, I picked from it, so this is by no means like some of the other teams who sneaked in a player or two extra from outside the list and had to end up with < 17 players.

Hamid Hassan should play, it's the right thing to do. It was already unfair to have to play without him in the last game, a do or die one at that too.

Originally Posted by Dilscoop
^ May be I should re-run all the Tyrants' games that Hamid Hasan played? May be you'd like that better?

Is that a threat? Because if it is, the Tyrants management will have to go back and rethink their involvement in the league. YOU made the mistake, CEO, it's on you to fix this. You can't change things in the middle of the league as you see fit.

Originally Posted by AsifTheManRahman
Is that a threat? Because if it is, the Tyrants management will have to go back and rethink their involvement in the league. YOU made the mistake, CEO, it's on you to fix this. You can't change things in the middle of the league as you see fit.

No it's not a threat. It's another suggestion.

And yes, and I accepted that. And I'm trying my best to fix it and make it fair on everyone. You had 5 games where Hamid Hasan should've have played and now I'm saying Hamid Hasan should sit out 5 games to even that out. That's the only option I have since I don't have a time machine...

Yes, I know you followed the orders, yes I know you didn't make any mistake, yes it was my mistake that I didn't see that Hamid Hasan was injured. Tyrants should've have to pay for my mistake. But they already had to luxury of getting a huge benefit out of my mistake.