If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Hi Unregistered,
We'll be undergoing major forum changes in the very near future. Be sure to check out the details here

It does in my opinion. You can't just have a pokemon look entirely different than what its type is. No, but everyone thinks a different way.

You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become a villain. -Harvey Dent
Look closely, because the closer you think you are, the easier it is to fool you. -Thaddeus Bradley
You can take away my toys, gadgets, and even my armor. But there is one thing you can't take away from me: Who I am. -Tony Stark
I may not remember who I am, but there is one thing I remember. I don't take orders. -Letty Ortiz

its not going to be grass ground or grass steel since it uses either night slash or sucker punch in the trailer (it cant be scratch or slash because it is using it against a part ghost type so it wouldn't effect) and it looks like it has nothing to do with the ground or steel

Chestnut can be a pokemon who knows dark moves and is not dark.
Learning Nigh Slash or Sucker Punch only mean Chestnut have claws or is fast.

its not going to be grass ground or grass steel since it uses either night slash or sucker punch in the trailer (it cant be scratch or slash because it is using it against a part ghost type so it wouldn't effect) and it looks like it has nothing to do with the ground or steel

There is no way that was sucker punch. That was a slashing type of move. The only two options that would make sense are Aerial Ace(Which it most likely is) and Night Slash.

It does in my opinion. You can't just have a pokemon look entirely different than what its type is. No, but everyone thinks a different way.

Except that's not correct either, for instance many thought (and still think) that Lugia would be a water/flying or even dragon/flying but not psychic. Looks can be helpful but they aren't always indicative of what a Pokemon's typing is or what their evolution will be.

Compare nearly any 3rd Generation animation to its 4th Generation counterpart, this is very true. Also, the 6th Generation is supposed to be "revolutionary", as in the game as we know it is going to drastically change.

Yes, but you can clearly tell the types of those pokémon with just a glance. I wouldn't mistake any of those pokémon for ground types. There are more clues on Chespin that lead me to believe that Chespin's evolutions will become part Ground, including the color, but not just the color.