Friday, April 27, 2012

Ron Johnson's Crass Vote Aginst the Violence Against Women Act

Yesterday the Senate passed an extension of the Violence Against Women Act. Ron Johnson voted against the extension and here's his explanation as to why:

“I believe it’s critical to ensure that laws are in place to prevent and
deter crime – against both women and men. Regrettably, the debate over
the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act was completely
politicized by the Senate Democratic leadership.

“Republicans offered very reasonable alternatives to extend the
Violence Against Women Act. Senate Democrats today defeated proposals to
provide U.S. Marshalls the tools they need to track sex offenders
across state lines. They voted against legislation to establish an
interstate database for DNA evidence, to ensure sex offenders are
brought to justice regardless or the jurisdiction in which they commit
their crimes. And they rejected legislation to provide additional funds
to allow law enforcement to pursue justice for hundreds of thousands of
women – women whose cases may depend on the results of DNA tests from
rape evidence kits currently caught in a backlog that stretches to the
hundreds of thousands.

The vote and was anything but partisan and passed 68-31. That's 15 Republicans voting in favor of the extension.

It's very tempting to dismiss the omissions from the bill Johnson cites above as being little more than rhetoric to cover his vote against what should be a no-brainer. Each of the provisions Johnson notes above cost money and are expansions of the federal government, so at least according to one of the guiding principles of his governing philosophy, Johnson appears to be contradicting himself.

What's more likely is that Johnson voted against the bill for the same reasons every other Republican who voted against it did:

But other Republicans objected to a number of the measure’s new
provisions. One would add language barring discrimination on the basis
of sexual orientation and gender identity in programs funded through the
measure.

Another would let law enforcement issue up to 5,000 more visas each
year to battered illegal immigrants who agree to participate in the
prosecution of serious crimes. The 2000 update of the bill set aside
10,000 visas annually for that purpose, which advocates believe
encourages victims to report crime. All 10,000 are being issued each
year, and advocates say more are needed.

A final area of contention would provide the government new authority
to prosecute non-Indian men who abuse Indian women on tribal
reservations.

It's this last area that is of particular relevance to Wisconsin. Wisconsin has one of the largest Native populations in the country; by this measure it's #9 at about 41,000. The Domestic violence epidemic among Native Americans isn't a well-kept secret and it's further complicated by the byzantine nuances between the intersections of tribal, state and federal law:

There is an epidemic of domestic violence on Native American
reservations. According to the National Congress of American Indians, a
Native American rights advocacy group, about 40 percent of Native
American women will face domestic violence. But more than half
of Native American women are married to non-Native American men, which
means that when cases of abuse arise, the local tribal authorities can
do very little because they don't have jurisdiction over non-tribe
members.

State and federal prosecutors have the authority to prosecute
domestic violence on reservations, but for geographic and logistical
reasons, it often goes unaddressed. "A federal prosecutor is not going
to be able to expend the kind of energy on misdemeanors that local
police officers would spend energy on," says Paulette Moore, vice
president for public policy at the National Network to End Domestic
Violence.

As Mother Jones reported last year, local authorities' inability or unwillingness to deal with domestic violence cases in Native American communities has contributed to an underground industry of vigilantes for
hire who take matters into their own hands. The current version of the
Violence Against Women Act would allow tribal authorities to prosecute
non-Indians for domestic violence cases on Indian reservations, but
Republicans are opposing it because they don't like the idea of Native
American law applying to non-tribe members.

"For the first time, the Committee would extend tribal criminal
jurisdiction over non-Indians," Grassley said in his floor speech. "I do
not believe the Committee has a good understanding of what the
consequences would be of doing so." The bill contains language
that affirms non-tribe members prosecuted receive the same due process
protections they would be entitled to under the US Constitution.

The bill's supporters expressed confusion at Grassley's logic.
"Suppose your sister was with you in Washington, DC, and her husband
beat her up," Moore says, "but because he was from Virginia, Washington
couldn't do anything about it."

This is a problem that disproportionately effects Wisconsin, but that doesn't seem to matter to Johnson whose only motivation for voting on bigger issues in the Senate seems to be spite.

Or maybe it's fear, which is usually a much stronger motivator. It frequently seems that Johnson only seeks to appease the core elements of his support, the revanchist wing of the conservative movement. because if he loses their support he has none. That's the corner Johnson's painted himself into and he's apparently so afraid of drawing their ire that he's willing to lay abused women on their alter. That's pretty discomforting.

To be sure, Johnson is not mistaken by believing that the vote on VAWA was politicized. Then again, the votes of every bill are politicized. This is politics, after all.

Luckily, should Johnson choose to run for re-election he will certainly hear about this vote.

17 comments:

Awesome website you have here but I was curious if you knew of any community forums that cover the same topics talked about in this article?I'd really love to be a part of group where I can get feed-back from other knowledgeable individuals that share the same interest. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Many thanks!

After looking at a handful of the blog posts on your web page, I honestly appreciate your technique of writing a blog.I saved as a favorite it to my bookmark site list and will be checking back soon.Please check out my website as well and let me know your opinion.

Its like you read my mind! You seem to know a lot about this, like you wrote the book in it or something.I think that you can do with a few pics to drive the message home a little bit,but instead of that, this is wonderful blog. A fantastic read.I'll definitely be back.

Excellent items from you, man. I have be mindful your stuff previous to and you're just too excellent. I really like what you have acquired here, really like what you're stating and the way through which you assert it. You're making it entertaining and you continue to take care of to stay it smart. I can not wait to read far more from you. That is actually a tremendous website.

And the fact that the current price of these new age tv sets is around $1000 which makes a set-top box like Roku seem a bargain as it delivers the same kind of experience.Although the soundboard is filled with many of Carell's or 'Michael's' best moments, the rest of the cast is present as well. On November 25, Entertainment Weekly reported that fans have gone so far as to sign a petition insisting the series bring Brian Griffin back to life.

Gems for Clash of Clans are a resource primarily gained through in app purchase.Of all units (Barbarian, Archer,Goblin, Giant, Wall Breaker, Balloon, Wizard, Healer, Dragon and P. Do you enjoy playing video games whenever you have a spare moment.

Winnebago Co, Oshkosh PD Scanner

Things My Therapist Instructed Me to Recite into a Mirror Every Morning

"Best New Oshkosh Blog …
The mysterious “JB” was a frequent commenter on other local blogs and the Northwestern Forums before finally realizing that he made sense more than everyone else … [H]e always seems to find amusing things to share with his readers. I check his site daily, twice, to see what he’s got to say."