On 15.04.2011 03:51, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> In order to disambiguate what was released by external entities from what
> the ASF APR Project has voted upon and released, I'd suggest that we best
> serve our users by 'skipping' apr-util 1.4.x, and at minimum, 1.4.0.
>
> Your opinions, please?
>
> [ ] Stay at apr-util 1.4.0 for the next pre-2.0 release
> [ ] Bump to apr-util 1.4.1 for the next pre-2.0 release
> [X] Bump to apr-util 1.5.0 for the next pre-2.0 release
Rainer