The Watchman On The Wall

Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Verse 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

Sunday, June 30, 2013

Watchman comment: patriots, I
believe the information below is more proof that our government is controlled
by evil men. We are now living in a period similar to 1933 to 1938 in Nazi
Germany and like the German people the American sheeple are being led to their
ultimate slaughter by Illuminati satanists.

Was Supreme Court Justice John
Roberts blackmailed into supporting Obama care via information gained about him
by the National Security Agency? The more US government crimes are being
exposed by whistleblowers such as Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning, Russ Tice
and Sibel Edmonds, the more I get the feeling that these criminal politicians
and criminals in the state department are the ones who are slowly being boiled,
not realizing that their crimes and lies have left them in extremely hot water.

In this remarkable interview, Sibel Edmonds reflects on Russ Tice’s recent revelations to
Boiling Frogs Post and The Corbett Report that the NSA has wiretapped top
government officials for years. Edmonds discusses from her own experience how
the FBI collects dirt on Congressman and public officials for use as political
leverage. We also talk about how this scandal proves that there is no “official
channel” for whistleblowers to follow when they want to expose wrongdoing
because the system is being controlled from behind the scenes by the criminals
in the national security establishment.

I have publicly stated my
belief that the NSA had used its spy apparatus to gather dirt on Supreme Court
Justice John Roberts, then used that leverage to force him to change his vote
on Obama care.

I also stated the NSA was
using its spy powers to surveil members of Congress and the U.S. Senate.
In an article published on June 16,
2013, I wrote, “There could already be countless cases of the NSA
using its god-like powers to blackmail people in key positions in the U.S.
Senate (which is full of pedophiles and perverts), the House of
Representatives, the State Department or even the US Supreme Court. There are
virtually no limits to the abuses of this power.”

Suddenly, new revelations
prove this to be true. Russ Tice, a Bush-era NSA analyst-turned-whistleblower
has sounded the alarm on the true depth of the NSA’s surveillance abuses. In an
interview on the Boiling Frogs Podcast,
Tice stated:

“They went after — and I
know this because I had my hands literally on the paperwork for these sort of
things — they went after high-ranking military officers; they went after
members of Congress, both Senate and the House, especially on the intelligence
committees and on the armed services committees and some of the — and judicial…

They went after lawyers and
law firms. All kinds of — heaps of lawyers and law firms. They went after
judges. One of the judges is now sitting on the Supreme Court that I had his
wiretap information in my hand. Two are former FISA court judges. They went
after State Department officials. They went after people in the executive
service that were part of the White House — their own people.”Sibel Edmonds discusses NSA blackmail.

Friday, June 28, 2013

"In politics, nothing happens
by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." (President Franklin Roosevelt, 33rd
Degree Mason, Illuminati)

An employee of the National Security Administration (NSA) had gone
public with the news, and with the proof, that NSA, and other government
agencies, were recording every phone call, every fax, every email and every
stroke on the computer, of every citizen of the United States. Americans are
simply not used to such a total invasion of privacy by government spooks.

Such surveillance activity has been going on for a long time. For
example, in 1998 under Democrat President Bill Clinton and his
Attorney-General, Janet Reno. The only reason the government could not carry
out surveillance to the degree Snowden is reporting is because the technology
was not quite as good in 1998 as it is in 2013.

Republican President George W. Bush expanded this outreach to
include all forms of communication using all forms of sophisticated science. Government
intrusion into the correspondence of a free people is an act which every
Absolute Dictatorship in history had attempted to carry out. Dictators are
always afraid of being overthrown by political dissidents; therefore, every
dictator in history attempts to know what every possible person is saying,
planning and carrying out, against him.

Every dictator knows he needs a national security administration that
can spy on his citizens. A dictator must identify his enemies and arrest them
before they can form alliances with like-minded enemies of the state.

Adolf Hitler and the Nazis used the same reasoning for
establishing the Gestapo as our last three presidents have used to support our
Homeland Security, NSA and the CIA.

Hitler said, "An evil exists that threatens every man, woman
and child of this great nation, we must take steps to ensure our domestic
security and protect our homeland."

After 9/11 Bush repeated
Hitler's false threat.

Do you remember? Under the guise of protecting our freedoms,
Republicans and Democrats alike trampled them into the dust, through Patriot
Acts I and II, through dozens of lesser laws designed to implement these
dictatorial laws.

Again here is what Hitler said and I quote: "The streets of
our country are in turmoil. The universities are filled with students rebelling
and rioting. Communists are seeking to destroy our country. Russia is
threatening us with her might. And the republic is in danger. Yes! Danger from
within and without, we need law and order! Without law and order our nation
cannot survive."

The time will come when the citizens of this great Republic must
not only know of its existence, but approve wholeheartedly.

How does one accomplish this task? How does one persuade a people
who have never known the whip of the military slave master to accept a
surveillance program that so clearly threatens his historic freedom?

First, you adopt Hitler's maxim that people will support war, or
actions just short of war, if they feel threatened by an outside force.

Step 1. Some practice so offensive that it can scarcely be
discussed in public is advocated by a RESPECTED expert in a RESPECTED forum.

Step 2. At first, the public is shocked, then outraged.

Step 3. The VERY FACT that such a thing could be
publicly debated becomes the SUBJECT of the debate.

Step 4. In the process, sheer repetition of the shocking subject
under discussion gradually dulling its effect. This step is by far the most
important element in the six-step program.

Step 5. People then are no longer shocked by the subject.

Step 6. No longer outraged, people begin to argue for positions to
moderate the extreme; or, they accept the premise, challenging, instead, the
means to ACHIEVE it.

This insidious method of changing the deeply-held attitudes of
people is being successfully directed toward the American population as a
whole. Millions of people are experiencing attitudinal changes on a wide
variety of subjects today. This attitudinal change is essential to achieving
the New World Order. This attitude change must occur in this subject of
complete surveillance of American citizens. Officials of the anti-christ One
World Government desperately want the average citizen to support this
all-pervasive surveillance system.

Step 2 -- People were outraged, particularly the Conservative who
has been trained to distrust government.

Step 3 -- Passage of Patriot Act I in October, 2001, was heavily
covered by Conservative media outlets. The Bush Administration intended to
expand the Clinton/Reno surveillance, using the higher tech developed since
1998. However, what made the Bush effort so much more insidious was that Bush
interlinked efforts of various government agencies so they could share
information, thus making the threat to the average American citizen much more
threatening. The CIA, FBI, NSA and Homeland Security merged their efforts and their
databases.

Step 4 -- People are outraged, particularly the Conservative
citizens who realize the trap the Elite had laid for American patriots. Under
the guise of protecting our freedoms from "terrorists", our
government has created a total surveillance system of the people.

Snowden’s revelation about the depth and height and width of the
surveillance program shocked most Americans, to differing degrees. Undiscerning
citizens were the most impacted because they had been blissfully sailing
through life, unaware of the degree to which their freedoms to communicate
private had already been severely eroded. Discerning Americans were less
shocked but some of us ex-military and ex-government officials realized the
electronic capability of the NSA.

Suddenly, commentators and patriots split into two distinct
groups. Some believed Snowden was a criminal traitor. Some of us believe
Snowden is a hero for revealing the government surveillance that threatens our
basic freedoms.

Many patriotic Americans, feel that U.S. government secrets are sacred
and must be protected at all costs. Personally I do not believe that. I believe
our government hides its evil acts behind a cloak of secrecy. I believe the
greatest danger to our freedoms and liberties is our government itself. Most
citizens have no idea about the Illuminati and that it was founded in1776 by
Adam Weishaupt. The sheeple also do not know their Bible and are not aware of
spiritual warfare. Ephesians 6:12 We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers
of the darkness of this world, against spiritualwickednessinhighplaces.

Also since President Franklin Roosevelt, Americans have increasingly
accepted the idea that the government is entirely benevolent and can be trusted
from cradle to grave. Since many Americans believe the government is always
benign and to be trusted, and since they know they are not doing anything
illegal or subversive, they will conclude that there is nothing threatening for
the government to capture all forms of communication every single hour of every
single day. That is until one of their relatives is arrested or detained in a
government camp.

The vast majority of sheeple do not oppose this total government
surveillance. We have proceeded down the slippery slope just like we did in
1973 with Roe v.Wade, abortion.

The time has now come for the public to know of this surveillance
and to approve of the Illuminati plan. The Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan is
the vehicle by which the Illuminati is going to take this surveillance program
into the mainstream. The anti-christ’s New World Government is being
established before our eyes. The One World Government that Nimrod planned
thousands of years with satan can finally be established.

By Jon Rappoport
June 27, 2013

Is the NSA a leaking sieve?

Well, Ed Snowden proved it, didn’t he?

He strolled into work with a thumb drive, plugged in, and stole
the holy of holies.

This is the vaunted NSA we’re talking about. They can reach out
and spy on anybody in the world, but they just didn’t remember to put
safeguards in place, in their own offices.

They forgot. For years.

You know, just an oops.

And people nod and shrug when they hear about it.

The NSA says, “Now that we’re aware of the problem, we’re going to
install new procedures to tighten security.”

Sure.

And then there is this. The NSA can spy on anyone in the world,
but they can’t find Ed Snowden now.

So… to sum up: we’re supposed to believe NSA can’t protect their
own files, and they can’t find the most wanted man in the world.

People actually accept this nonsense.

So the question arises: if the NSA really does know where Snowden
is right now, why hasn’t the Pentagon dispatched a team to snatch him and bring
him home? Or why hasn’t the team killed him?

Two reasons. If Snowden really does have more damning information,
and if, as Glenn Greenwald says, Snowden’s already sent it to multiple people
in case anything happens to him, then capturing or killing him would trigger
the release of that information.

And two, the groundswell of support for Snowden is growing at a
rapid pace. Can you imagine what could happen if the government grabbed Snowden
and brought him home to go on trial for treason?

The uproar would explode. The NSA would find itself under far
greater attack. Politicians like Pelosi and Feinstein, who’ve come out against
Snowden, could easily be swept away on the tide.

The current image of Snowden is sincere, honest, frank, and self-sacrificing.
He doesn’t want to go after individual spies. He wants to change the system.

As we speak, government-contracted PR people and psyop specialists
are burning the midnight oil, doing a risk-benefit analysis, trying to figure
out how they could handle bringing Snowden home and placing him on trial. How
they could change his image.

Is it worth it? What happens if they let Snowden roam free for a
few more months? If they bring him home, can they spin media coverage to make
him look bad? Worse than bad? Will that backfire? Do they have enough media
ducks lined up?

Will Brian Williams, Scott Pelley, and Dianne Sawyer tune up just
right on this issue? Will they be able to hypnotize enough of the public into
believing Snowden is a traitor?

What about the “online community,” which is firmly on Snowden’s
side after the revelations about nine tech giants cooperating fully with the
NSA? How about 100,000 sites and bloggers going wild about the injustice of
snatching Snowden and putting him on trial?

If, as I’ve argued in previous
articles (see Spygate on this
blog), Snowden is actually still working for his old employer, the CIA, and
forwarding a turf war between the CIA and NSA, we’d have to say CIA has done a
good job in positioning Snowden. The CIA might be crazy, but they aren’t
(always) stupid.

Right out of the box, Snowden made a complete statement to the
press about his intentions and motives. He just wants to expose the illegal
spying on all US citizens so the public can decide what should be done, because
after all, this is still a democracy.

Snowden says he doesn’t want praise. He’s not a hero. He just
wants transparency. And the NSA is breaking the law over and over.

Honorable hero? CIA operative? Either way, the US government is in
a pickle. It’s not going to be a slam-dunk with this guy.

In a related issue, it’s astonishing (to anyone who is awake) that
the Congress hasn’t come down on NSA like a ton of bricks.

We should be hearing a grilling like this, directed at NSA head,
Keith Alexander:

“Let me get this straight, General Alexander. Snowden captured and
stole your most secret data. Anyone of his rank at NSA could have done the
same, because you have no security protection against it. And now, with the
most sophisticated spying system in the world, you can’t find Snowden. This
makes the NSA the most bumbling stumbling trillion-dollar organization in the
history of mankind. Can you give me a good reason why we shouldn’t move to
de-fund NSA completely and start over from scratch? This is outrageous.”

And that would just be the beginning of the assault.

Yet, that’s not what we’re getting. Instead, so far, we’re hearing
a few modest criticisms.

Why?

The most obvious answer is, Congress is afraid of the NSA. This
bunch of legislators, these crooks and con men and perverts and felonious scum
are scared that they’ve been under the NSA spying lens for a long time.

And what could come crawling out of NSA files is terrifying to
them.

So they hold still. They take a deep breath. They pray for safety.
They go on the attack against Snowden. They fall all over themselves calling
Snowden a vile traitor who must be brought to justice.

Which tells you something about who’s running things in
Washington.

It also tells you something about the level of resentment that’s
built up over the years against the NSA. Not just in the Congress. In certain
quarters of the CIA and the elite media, because NSA has been spying on
reporters and editors and taking huge chunks of federal budget $$ away from the
CIA.

Lots of important people have been hoping for a way to take down
NSA a peg or two.

So this is the kind of Congressional-NSA conversation that’s going
on right now, behind closed doors in Washington:

“Here’s the thing, General Alexander. We spoken about this before.
Your NSA has been invading our lives with your snooping for far too long. Now
we have a trump card. Ed Snowden. We’re playing it. I’m not admitting he’s our
creature, I’m just saying he’s doing the kind of work we ourselves should have
done years ago. So we want some give and take here.”

“What kind of give and take?”

“Get off our backs. We’ll go easy on you. We won’t turn all our
guns on you. We’ll call Snowden a traitor. We’ll focus all the public attention
on him. But give us our privacy back. Now.”

“Well, I suppose we might do that.”

“But we have to know you’re setting us free to do whatever the
hell we want to do, without fear of being seen doing it. We need guarantees.”

“How might that work?”

“We need people we appoint to have oversight on NSA. Real
oversight.”

The beginnings of an uneasy truce. A problematic truce, to be
sure.

Oh, people might say, this sort of dealing never takes place.

Really? And you’re living in what world? The rainbow happy-happy
goody-good sandbox planet just to the left of Oz?

The only question is, do the political enemies of NSA have enough
juice yet, from the Snowden affair, to engage in this kind of conversation and
come out with a win?

But that’s about tactics. The intention is clear. There are
political players who want to take the NSA down a notch. Some of them may be
honorable patriots; but some of them are definitely rank criminals in
politicians’ clothing, who want to feel free from the Big Watching Eye.

Ed Snowden is their man of the hour. They will use him and what he
symbolizes to make hay while the sun shines.

Why is all this important? And why does it matter who Snowden
really represents?

It’s important because, the way this political game works, the NSA
will escape the current scandal with its major spying programs intact, there
will be dirty deals and compromises, and the NSA will still hold tremendous
power.

No one in Washington imagines that NSA’s spying on private
American citizens will significantly decline.

If people really understood that, if they understood that no
savior is coming to unhook NSA’s computers, they might begin to view the
Snowden affair differently. They might be willing to consider the real games
that are being played.

They might admit that what we need is a nullification of
Washington power that goes far beyond anything that Ed Snowden can provide.

Our real problem is the limited mind, or perhaps we should call it
the literal mind.

The literal mind can’t conceive of the levels of deception and
bent deal-making below the surface of events presented on the evening news.

The literal mind can’t, for example entertain the possibility that
Snowden’s revealed some important (though hardly surprising) information, while
at the same time, he has less than the purest of motives.

The literal mind is a programmed mind.

You present it with the image of the most competent and brilliant
spying agency in the world, the NSA, and the “fact” that this agency can’t find
its own ex-employee, Ed Snowden, and there is no perceived problem. No
inconsistency.

The literal mind accepts all contradictions like hundred-dollar
bills.

You could, for example, spend a year educating that mind about the
US corporations that aided the Nazis in World War 2. You could spell out all
the details. IBM, ITT, Standard Oil, etc.

And then, you could ask, “Do you think there is any chance the War
was manipulated?”

And that mind would say, “Of course not. It was us versus them.”

You could say, “The science on manmade global warming is settled,”
and the literal mind would never think of replying, “Explain what you mean by
‘settled.’ Who settled it? Exactly how?”

You could say, “Every year in the US, pharmaceutical drugs kill a
minimum of 106,000 people. Nutritional supplements kill no one. But the FDA,
which permits those drugs to enter the marketplace, relentlessly attacks
supplements. It does nothing to stem the tide of deaths owing to the medical
drugs.”

The literal mind would reply, “Yes? And? So?”

Some preposterous doofus on the news says, “Ed Snowden is walking
around with three laptops that contain the deepest secrets of the NSA. Chinese
or Russian hackers could have already gained access to all that information.”

The literal mind would never wonder why, then, the NSA can’t
accomplish the same feat and discover what Snowden has pilfered.

The literal mind, under guidance from elite media anchors, will
connect the dots directly in front of it, but it will avoid, at all costs,
imagination. It will never posit alternative realities or explanations which
then make those dots take on different meaning, fuller and deeper and truer
meaning.

The literal mind is full of fear and protection. It wants to
protect itself and it is afraid that something novel might swim into view and
shatter it to pieces.

The literal mind is a clog in the bloodstream of life. It’s a
believer in the extreme fairy tale of ordinary reality.

The literal mind imports, wholesale, images of ordinary reality
and clings to them like a leech.

The literal mind, when it accidentally rubs up against creative
life, retreats into a corner and mutters and curses.

The literal mind lives a second-hand existence through the news,
which is the only food it can eat.

When the literal mind reaches the end of its tether, it seeks out
codified religious blather invented by a priest class for the purpose of
cutting people off from their own authentic spiritual energies and insights and
connections.

The literal mind is a coward. It only asks for other cowards with
which it can commune.

The day is too long, the night is too long, the fear is too great.
The literal mind must therefore play out the string of a shrunken number of
days and wither away, hoping it can deceive the void it feels at the center of
its own experience.

The literal mind crawls around on a bed in the Universal Hospital.
It dreams of extinction, while knowing it is already extinct.

Do not hold out a helping hand to the literal mind. It will try to
snap your finger off. That gesture is all it has left.

In the end, the literal mind turns out to be the most fictional
thing in the world.

On Thursday, CNN’s Erin Burnett continued the Illuminati’s
propaganda onslaught against the “leaker” Edward Snowden. After fatuously
mischaracterizing Snowden as a “hacker,” Burnett introduced former General
Wesley Clark and Peter Brookes of the Heritage Foundation,

Clark, a notoriouswar criminalwho
used cluster bombs and depleted uranium on civilians during his term as the
Supreme Commander of NATO forces, said the American people love the idea of the
government illegally and unconstitutionally spying on them. Clark told Burnett
the “American people are solidly behind the prism program and all that’s going
on,” never mindnumerous polls
indicating the American people are steadfastly opposed to the government’s
surveillance programs.

Brookes
underscored the Illuminati’s claim that Snowden is a spy guilty of espionage
despite the fact he is not accused of working for a foreign government. “He’s a
30-year-old spy. He’s been charged with espionage,” Brookes insisted.

Clark
and Brookes are part of the Illuminati media echo chamber declaring Edward
Snowden is a traitor for revealing the unconstitutional behavior of government
and its Stasi state apparatus. From The New Yorker to MSNBC and Politico and
beyond, the Illuminati media is focusing on Snowden – his idiosyncrasies, his
girlfriend, even the fact he did not finish high school – while ignoring the
serial criminality of the NSA, the Obama administration and Congress.

“Only because of Snowden do we know that our government is storing
records of our phone data that can be mined for God only knows how long,”
writesKirsten Powersfor The Daily Beast.

In
fact, we have known for a long time about the government – more specifically,
thenational
security state–
spying on the American people, commencing soon after its inception in 1947 and
mushrooming under quaintly named programs such as Project SHAMROCK and sister
program Project MINARET. Enough evidence was revealed by the Senate’sSelect
Committee to StudyGovernmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence
Activitiesback
in 1976 to implicate the government in this sort of elicit behavior, but thanks
to theestablishment
media and the public miseducation system millions ofAmericans
are blissfully unaware of the crimes of the national security state.

As a side note, the above linked Senate report is flagged as a“badware”website by Google. “Many kinds of
badware aren’t visible or obvious, and they can install silently as soon as you
visit an infected page. Google’s detection systems are VERY accurate. We
suggest you don’t visit the site again until the owner resolves the problem!”

In
other words, Google thinks it is very accurate at steering folks away from the
truth, in this instance documentary American people.

Google, as atrusted
appendage of the Illuminati has a vested interest in diverting the
unsuspecting away from the truth the same as CNN, the consistently
featherbrained Erin Burnett and Illuminati apologists Wesley Clark and Peter
Brookes.

Friends, remember God is not the
author of confusion. Racial division is the tool of satan. Satan and his human
henchmen the Illuminati promote racial division because satan loves violence,
mayhem and death.

The George Zimmerman case is not about justice. It’s an excuse for
a lot of ignorant people to express their racist attitudes. Due to decades of
political correctness promoted by the Illuminati and inculcated through their
media, cultural and educational programming system, emotionally charged racist
violence is now acceptable and has been since at least the 1992 L.A. riots that
claimed over 50 lives following the beating of Rodney King. If George Zimmerman
is acquitted, there is the possibility of mob violence and riots with no
shortage of violent thugs willing to participate.

Racist polarization, promoted in theatrical fashion by the Illuminati
Hegelian dialectic media, distracts people from the real cause of class and
racial division — an economic and social system designed for exploitation and
predation by a hereditary Illuminati elite. If we are feeding on each other, if
we perpetually with the passing of each generation fall victim to class and
racial warfare, we will never recognize the real criminal class victimizing us
all.

The Department of Defense refers to
the censorship as “network hygiene” to cleanse military servers of
“unauthorized disclosures of classified information,” according to Gordon Van
Vleet, a spokesman for U.S. Army NETCOM in an e-mail to the Monterey County
Herald.

The California newspaper began investigating after employees of
the Presidio of Monterey, an army garrison, started complaining.

“We make every effort to balance the need to preserve information
access with operational security,” Van Vleet said in the e-mail. “However there
are strict policies and directives in place regarding protecting and handling
classified information.”

“The DoD is also not going to block websites from the American
public in general, and to do so would violate our highest-held principle of
upholding and defending the Constitution and respecting civil liberties and
privacy.”

An ironic statement considering the NSA and the behemoth
cyber-industrial complex hold no such principle as they betray our Constitution
in their attack on our cherished civil liberties and privacy.

But according to army brass, this gross assault on our basic human
rights and the foundation of our republic is simply a classified information
leak by a foreign media outlet that requires purging through routine, automated
maintenance.

According to them, classified information must be protected, even
if its evidence that the NSA’s unreasonable search and seizures are so far
reaching, the physical size of the drag net could stretch most of the distance
to Mars:

SSGT Joe Biggs

U.S. Army brass toldRolling Stone journalist Michael Hastings that he
would be hunted down and killed over his story that lead to General
McChrystal’s downfall, according to Hasting’s closest friend in the June 26
bombshell interview on the Alex Jones Show.

Hastings died in Los Angeles on June 18 in an explosive single-car
crash that left his fuel efficient Mercedes C250 engulfed in flames which
towered above the heights of nearby houses.

First responders found the four-cylinder engine 100 feet away from
the crash.

Biggs said that Hastings was
working on his “biggest story yet” involving the CIA. The journalist is known
to have made a number of powerful enemies.

Biggs also stated that it was completely out of character for
Hastings to be driving at high speeds that early in the morning. But Biggs made
even stronger revelations on the Alex Jones Show as he described how well he
knew Hastings.

Biggs and Hastings met in 2008 when the journalist came to
Afghanistan to cover the daily combat, an assignment only meant to last one
week. That week turned into three months.

“You get to learn a lot about a person in one day of combat, let
alone three months of being around them,” Biggs said.

Biggs stayed in touch with the journalist after the assignment,
which culminated into a strong friendship.

“I remember when the story broke with General McChrystal and he
[Hastings] gave me a call and he’s like ‘man, I’m pretty scared,’” Biggs said.
“I told him, ‘You have a reason to be, brother. You basically just got a
general of a war fired. I’m pretty sure that doesn’t sit too well with him
right now.’”

Hastings’ fear was very well-founded as he received severe death
threats over the McChrystal story.

“He had been told, if we don’t like what you write, we will hunt
you down and kill you,” Biggs said. “For him to say something like that, those
are his own words, that’s pretty intense.”

But Hastings continued on with his journalism career and recently
began investigating a CIA story which apparently led to his death.

“So last Monday morning I wake up and I get this e-mail from Mike,
and usually the e-mails start off ‘hey brother, how’s it going, how’s your
family, how are you adjusting to the civilian life’ because I’m out of the
military now,” Biggs said.

But in this particular e-mail,
Hastings warned that the FBI would be investigating his colleagues and his
friends. He also said that he was on a big story and would need to go “off the
radar.”

“It just didn’t seem like something that he normally started his
e-mail off with,” Biggs said. “When I read it, I just got this horrible
feeling, like something’s not right.”

Biggs asked his friends for their opinions on Hastings’ latest
e-mail. They all thought it was scary.

Then once Biggs heard about Hastings’ fatal crash, things just
didn’t add up for him.

He knew that Hastings contacted a lawyer recently and questioned
why an investigative reporter happened to be filming an empty street at four in
the morning when he recorded Hastings driving by.

“All these alarms were going off and my gut feeling from day one,
from before it happened, I knew that something wasn’t right,” Biggs said.

Alex asked Biggs if his years of combat honed his gut instinct.

“Yeah, I just… just anybody who knows someone and they act out of…
out of reason, out of their normal behavior, that should send a red light off
in anybody,” Biggs responded.

Alex also asked Biggs why he wanted to go public regarding the
death of his friend. Biggs said he contacted the other recipients of Hastings’
e-mail but received little response.

“Somebody’s got to come out and say something,” Biggs said.
“Someone’s got to… I can’t be the only person that thinks this is just weird.”

“Mike would do the same thing for me,” Biggs said. “He’s not going
to sit back and roll over.”

“I’m not a journalist, I’m not an investigator, I don’t know what
steps to take. All I know is that I lost a friend.”

An unsettlingreportprepared by the
Emergencies Ministry (EMERCOM)
circulating in the Kremlin today on thejust completed talksbetween Russia and the United States in WashingtonD.C. says that the Obama regime has requested at least 15,000
Russian troops trained in disaster relief and “crowd functions” [i.e. riot
control] be pre-positioned to respond toFEMA Region IIIduring an unspecified “upcoming” disaster. (Watchman comment: Could this disaster occur at the Boy Scout Jamboree see Watchman Report 13-284 written on 28 May 2013.

The Boy Scout Jamboree will be in region III

According to thisreport, this unprecedented request was
made directly to Minister Vladimir Puchkov by USDepartment of Homeland Security(DHS) DirectorJanet Napolitanowho said these Russian troops would
work “directly and jointly” with herFederalEmergency
Management Agency (FEMA), part of whose mission is tosecure the continuity of the US
governmentin theeventofnatural disastersor war.

Important to note, thisreportsays, is that FEMA Region III, the
area Russian troops are being requested for, includesWashingtonD.C. and the surrounding States of
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia, “strongly suggesting” that
the Obama regime has lost confidence in its own military being able to secure
its survival should it be called upon to do so.

As to what “upcoming disaster” the US
is preparing for, thisreportcontinues,
appears to be “strongly related” to lastweeksassassination
of American reporter Michael Hastings who was killed while attempting to reach
the safety of the Israeli Consulate in Los Angeles, and as we had reported on
in our 20 JunereportTop US Journalist Attempting To Reach Israeli Consulate
Assassinated.

Not mentioned in this EMERCOMreportis any suggestion that Russia would
comply with this request from the Obama regime, especially in light of the horrifying
information being given to Russian intelligence analysts fromEdward Snowdenwho has been labeled as the most
wanted man in the world.

According to oneFederal Security Services(FSB) bulletin on their
continued debriefing of Snowden, and analysis of the information he has
provided Russian intelligence officers, hisfather,Lonnie Snowden, was an
officer in the US Coast Guard during the 11 September 2001 attacks on the
United States who had “direct knowledge” of the true events that occurred and
whom the real perpetrators were.

Being directly affected by the events
of 9/11, this FSB bulletin says, Snowden “self initiated” a multi-year effort
to gain access to America’s top secrets, a mission which when recently
completed led him to contact various international reporters, including
Hastings, whom he believed could be trusted with disseminating the information
he had obtained.

Though known to us directly from our
Kremlin sources as to the exact connections Snowden’s information proves
regarding 9/11 and both the Bush and Obama regimes, and the even more horrificeventsoon to come, aJune 2013Defence Advisory Notice (DA-Notice) prevents our being able to…at this
time.

Georgia lawmaker Doug Teper (Democrat) has
proposed a bill to replace the state’s electric chair with the
guillotine.

Teper’s reasoning? It would allow for death-row inmates as organ donors, he
says, since the “Blade makes a clean cut and leaves vital organs intact.”Georgia lawmaker Doug Teper (Democrat) has
proposed a bill to replace the state’s electric chair with the
guillotine.

Teper’s reasoning? It would allow for death-row inmates as organ donors, he
says, since the “Blade makes a clean cut and leaves vital organs intact.”

"...but this is your hour, and the power of
darkness." Luke 22:53

You can see it everywhere you look, things are different now.
That part of your mind that's screaming at you that something is not right,
but you can't quite put your finger on it. Time is rushing forward away from
you, unstoppable.

The bible said these days would come, and behold, they are
nearly here. America's moral fiber has been obliterated, with all manner of
sin and perversion paraded openly. Proudly. The Gay Revolution has arrived,
and will destroy everything it touches. The American President has become the
official LGBTQ spokesperson, deftly leading us down the sin-slimed rabbit hole of what God
destroyed Sodom for. Think about that.

But we, especially Americans, are not afraid of God. Not
anymore.

The bible talks about a time of literal Hell on earth called
the Great Tribulation. It will happen shortly after The Lord Jesus Christ comes for
His church as He promised to do in the Rapture. We who are saved and redeemed by the shed Blood of
the Lamb live in hour-by-hour anticipation of that moment. It will happen.
But for those of you who are not saved, monstrous tribulation awaits. It sits
just a few steps ahead of where you are right now like a yawning dragon,
mouth open, waiting for you to walk right in.

Look at the graphic in this story, it shows you two choices.
God is asking you to pick one, to choose. Choose life in Heaven with Jesus
Christ and live forever with the redeemed. The other choice is eternal
torment in fire unquenchable prepared for the Devil and His angels. But know
this: God recognizes no neutrality. Making no choice is the same as choosing
Hell.

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only
begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have
everlasting life." John 3:16

Time is almost up. Where will YOU spend eternity?

(Watchman
comment: here we are patriots, another illegal war in Syria by the evil war mongers in
Washington. The purpose of this war is to create kingdom #7 for the anti-christ. Remember 10 kingdoms will answer to the anti-christ and three will rebel against him. As I have said many times we witnessing the destruction of Damascus - Isaiah 17 right before our eyes.)

The Wall Street Journalreported on 27 June 2013 that the CIA is moving
weapons from secret warehouses to Jordan ahead of an August offensive in Syria.
The covert plan was authorized by Obama earlier this month and Arab and uropean nations are also involved in the
effort.

Saudi Arabia plans to provide Manpads, shoulder-fired
anti-aircraft missiles, to a select number of groomed terrorist mercenaries,
according to U.S. officials. The U.S. will “monitor this effort… to try to
reduce the risk that the Manpads could fall into the hands of Islamists.”

In fact, the U.S. and its Arab and European collaborators depend
almost exclusively on fanatical Salafist mercenaries. The CIA plans to spend
around two weeks grooming an initial group of Salafist fighters and training
them to use small arms and antitank missiles.

Sheikh Nabil Naiim

The most effective mercenaries
sponsored by the CIA are al-Qaeda (AQ) terrorists, a fact underscored recently
when Sheikh Nabil Naiim, who led an AQ training
camp in Egypt, said al-Nusra is controlled by the CIA. “I personally believe that the leader of the
Nusra Army who declared his support for Ayman al-Zawahiri, is a CIA operative
in the al-Nusra,” Naiim said. He also said AQ boss Ayman al-Zawahiri is a
double agent working for the United States. (Watchman comment: I would say al-Zawahiri
is working for the Illuminati, the one world government gang.)

The al-Nusra Front and related
Salafist groups in Syria are funded by the CIA and the Sunni government of
Qatar. They are the driving force behind the effort to militarily defeat Syrian
leader al-Bashar.

“These extremist groups have become
the best equipped, most organized, consistently well-funded and importantly,
the most successful on the ground,” writes Phil Greaves. “While the
US and its Gulf allies claim to have only armed, trained and supported ‘vetted’
and ‘moderate’ rebels, the
reality inside Syria bears absolutely no resemblance to these claims.”

General Salim Idriss

Despite the demonstrable fact the al-Bashar government cannot be
dislodged without al-Nusra and AQ in
Syria, the United States insists the August offensive will bolster Gen. Salim
Idriss and his Supreme Military Command.

Idriss has admitted that
the Free Syrian Army and other secular forces inside Syria cannot match the
dedicated fighting power of the Salafist mercenaries supported by the Wahhabi
regimes in Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

The Obama administration has not released additional details on
the CIA sponsored offensive. Bernadette Meehan, a spokeswoman for the White
House National Security Council, refused to comment on the plan.

Dan Cathy, a brave man who stands for Biblical principles

The
president of the fast-food restaurant chain Chick-fil-A bravely injected
himself into the gay marriage debate, this time criticizing U.S. Supreme Court
rulings on Twitter. Personally, I wish this man was president but he
would never be elected in the United States of today.

"Sad day
for our nation; founding fathers would be ashamed of our gen. to abandon wisdom
of the ages re: cornerstone of strong societies," Cathy wrote, according
to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (http://bit.ly/12qjRKF). The post was later deleted.

"Dan recognizes his views do not necessarily
represent the views of all Chick-fil-A customers, restaurant owners and
employees, so he removed the tweet to eliminate any confusion," the
company said.

Cathy's view on
gay marriage has created controversy for the Atlanta-based company best known
for its fried chicken sandwiches and closing on Sundays. Last year, Cathy told
the Baptist Press that the company was "guilty as charged" for
backing "the biblical definition of a family." In a later radio
interview, he ratcheted up the rhetoric: "I think we are inviting God's judgment on our
nation when we shake our fist at him and say, 'We know better than you as to
what constitutes a marriage.'"

Public
officials in Boston, Philadelphia and Chicago told the company it was no not
welcome, though the firm said it set a one-day sales record when after its
supporters — including many religious conservatives — held a "Chick-fil-A
Appreciation Day" last year. Gay marriage supporters held a "Kiss
In" at the restaurants to protest Cathy's views.

Monsignor "Scar Face" Scarano

Friends, corruption, false doctrines
and pedophilia in the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) is rampant. You will recall the Vatican Bank scandal in 1982. The Institute
for the Works of Religion – IOR), commonly known as
the Vatican Bank, is a privately held institute located inside Vatican City and
run by an advisory board who reports directly to a
committee of cardinals and the Pope.

Former bank
president Ettore Gotti Tedeschi was removed from his
post by the board of directors for dereliction of duty in May 2012.

Was the Vatican Mason Roberto Calvi murdered because he knew too much?

The Institute was involved in a major political and financial scandal in
1982, concerning the $4.7 billion collapse of Banco Ambrosiano,
of whom the Vatican Bank was the main shareholder. ere

The head of IOR from 1971 to
1989, Archbishop Paul Marcinkus, was under consideration for
indictment in 1982 in Italy as an accessory of the bankruptcy;
though never tried by the Italian courts' in ruling that the Catholic priest,
a prelate of
the Vatican, had diplomatic immunity from prosecution. As a private
organization performing banking-like functions for religious institutions, it
is not subject to public scrutiny. The bank presented a short presentation on
its operations in 2012. In June 2013 Pope Francis issued a chirograph creating
a special investigative Pontifical Commission to report on the
Institute. The five member commission includes two cardinals as well as Harvard Law Professor
Mary Ann Glendon.

The Pope gives the 666 symbol and the "all seeing satanic eye symbol

Now prosecutors allege Monsignor
Nunzio Scarano was involved in a plot to bring €20m in cash into Italy from
Switzerland aboard an Italian government plane.

Msgr Scarano, a recently
suspended accountant in one of the Vatican’s main financial departments, is
accused of fraud, corruption and slander stemming from the plot, which never
got off the ground, his attorney, Silverio Sica said.

He said Msgr Scarano was a middleman
in the operation and that friends had asked him to intervene with a broker to
return €20m they had given him to invest.

Mr Sica said the Monsignor
persuaded the broker to return the money, and an Italian secret service agent
went to Switzerland to bring the cash back aboard an Italian government
aircraft.

The operation failed because
the broker reneged on the deal, Mr Sica said.

The broker nevertheless, demanded his €400,000 commission. Mr
Scarano paid him an initial €200,000 by cheque, which the broker deposited, Mr
Sica said.

But in an attempt to not have
the second cheque deposited at the bank, Msgr Scarano filed a report for a
missing €200,000 cheque, Mr Sica said.

The broker and secret service
agent were also were arrested along with Msgr Scarano, Mr Sica said.

It is not the only troubles
facing Monsignor Scarano.

Prosecutors in the southern
city of Salerno have placed him under investigation for alleged
money-laundering stemming from his account at the Vatican’s bank, the Institute
for Religious Works.

Just this week, Pope Francis
named a commission of inquiry into the bank to get to the bottom of the
problems that have plagued it for decades and contributed to damaging the
Vatican’s reputation in global financial circles.

That investigation concerns
transactions Msgr Scarano made in 2009 in which he took €560,000 in cash out of
his personal IOR bank account and carried it out of the Vatican and into Italy
to help pay off a mortgage on his Salerno home.

To deposit the money into an
Italian bank account – and to prevent family members from finding out he had
such a large chunk of cash – he asked 56 close friends to accept €10,000 in
cash in exchange for a cheque or money transfer in the same amount.

Msgr Scarano was then able to
deposit the amounts in his Italian account.

He had given the names of the
donors to prosecutors and insisted the origin of the money was clean, that the
transactions did not constitute money-laundering, and that he only took the
money “temporarily” for his personal use.

“He declares himself
absolutely innocent,” Mr Sica said of the Salerno investigation.

Vatican spokesman Rev Federico
Lombardi said the Vatican is taking the appropriate measures to deal with Msgr
Scarano’s case.

Retired General James Cartwright

Another high-ranking senior general is in trouble. Retired General James Cartwright, a former second-highest-ranking
officer, is under investigation for leaking information on a covert computer
virus, called Stuxnet.

The virus was used in 2010 to temporarily disable 1,000
centrifuges used for enriching uranium by Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Cartright, who was the number two person in the joint chiefs of
staff from 2007 to 2011, was instrumental in the development of Stuxnet, and
his role was publicised in a New York Times article published
last year.

The article exposed that the virus was the Obama administration’s
key weapon against Iran’s nuclear weapons programme.

President Obama responded to the article sternly: My attitude has
been zero tolerance for these kinds of leaks. These are criminal acts when they
release information like this.

It’s simply a stunning development when you consider that the
Obama administration has always said that ‘people who leak are going to be
prosecuted if we figure out who they are.

Steve Aftergood, director of of the Federation of American
Scientists said, “there are many reasons why people leak classified
information”.

“Sometimes to attack a program, sometimes to defend it, sometimes
we don’t ever know,” he said.

Stuxnet is capable of both surveillance and harming computers, and
was initally spread using infected removable drives.