Chemotherapy kills cancer patients faster than no treatment at all

Wishful thinking simply won't deter from the fact that the cancer industry is just that: an industry. Doctors, drug companies, hospitals and other key stakeholders profit heavily each time a cancer patient submits to the conventional treatment model, which typically involves injecting chemotherapy poisons into the body, blasting it with ionizing radiation or cutting off body parts -- or some barbaric combination of all three.

It might rub some people the wrong way to state this, especially those who've had to watch a loved one die from conventional cancer treatment, but each of these supposed treatments don't actually work, in many cases. Little-known science, which the medical-industrial complex has made it a practice to ignore or cover up, reveals that, despite what the medical industry often claims, chemotherapy in particular just isn't an effective cancer treatment.

Dr. Hardin B. Jones, a former professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California, Berkeley, had been studying the lifespans of cancer patients for more than 25 years when he came to the conclusion that, despite popular belief, chemotherapy doesn't work. He witnessed a multitude of cancer patients treated with the poison die horrific deaths, many of them meeting their fate much earlier than other patients who chose no treatment at all.

After investigating this further, Dr. Jones found that cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy actually died more quickly, in most cases, than those who followed their doctors' recommendations by getting the treatment. A few number-crunching efforts later and Dr. Jones exposed a fact that the conventional cancer industry doesn't want the world to know about its multi-billion-dollar cash cow.

"People who refused treatment lived for an average of 12 and a half years," stated Dr. Jones about his study's findings, which were published in the journal Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences. "Those who accepted other kinds of treatment lived on an average of only 3 years."
Breast cancer patients who reject all conventional therapies live four times longer than those who follow the system

Did you catch that? Refusing conventional cancer treatments and doing nothing resulted in cancer patients living more than four times longer than their more compliant counterparts. This is something you'll never hear about from the mainstream media, which continues to peddle the myth that cancer patients somehow need poison injected into their bodies in order to survive and reach "cure" status.

Dr. Jones' study also found that the same is true concerning conventional treatments for breast cancer. Women with breast cancer who refused chemotherapy, radiation and surgery -- and remained untreated -- likewise lived four times longer than women who went under the knife or agreed to be poisoned with chemicals.

As admitted in a more recent study published in the journal Clinical Oncology back in 2004, chemotherapy is really only effective about 2 percent of the time for all cancers. And this is based on the standard five-year survival rate criteria, which isn't technically indicative of a cure -- even though health authorities often like to claim it is.

A separate study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association back in 1979 found that many of the most common procedures for diagnosing and treating breast cancer, nearly all of which are still used today, have done nothing to lower breast cancer rates or increase survival for breast cancer patients.

Two other studies, one of out Israel that was published in 1978 and another out of the UK that was published in The Lancet in 1980, came to similar findings.

"Overall survival of patients with primary breast cancer has not improved in the past 10 years, despite increasing use of multiple-drug chemotherapy for treatment of metastasis," explains the Lancet study, entitled "Failure of Chemotherapy to Prolong Survival in a Group of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer."

"Furthermore, there has been no improvement in survival from first metastasis, and survival may even have been shortened in some patients given chemotherapy."

Natural cancer treatments are your best bet should you develop this horrible disease

There are solutions to treating cancer naturally, though, that don't involve just doing nothing -- which is still clearly better than going the conventional route. An abundance of natural cancer treatment options are outlined over at EndAllDisease.com, a free resource containing an abundance of information about health, disease, the environment and more:EndAllDisease.com.

Ethan Huff is a freelance writer and health enthusiast who loves exploring the vast world of natural foods and health, digging deep to get to the truth. He runs an online health publication of his own at http://wholesomeherald.blogspot.com.