LE
PEN, THE SAVIOR OF THE JEWS IN FRANCE
AND THE REST OF EUROPE? by H. Millard (c) 2002

Far rightist Jean-Marie Le Pen has caused a dilemma among Jews world
wide, and especially in France, with his second place finish in the
first round of voting in that nation on April 21.

In a stunning upset, Le Pen beat Socialist Prime Minister
Lionel Jospin, and will next meet conservative President Jacques Chirac
in the May 5, runoff.

Analysts give Le Pen little chance of beating Chirac,
but many of these same analysts didn't give him any chance of coming
in second in the first round, either.

The dilemma faced by thinking Jews is that so many
of them have attacked Le Pen as an anti-Semite, that they are now psychologically
incapable of acting in their own best interest by helping elect Le Pen,
who in France, is the embodiment of the expression, the enemy of my
enemy is my friend.

Le
Pen's main campaign theme involves expelling millions of immigrants
from France. Most of these immigrants are Muslims from North Africa
who are anti-Jewish, anti-Israel, and pro-Palestinian. Their growing
strength is fueling an increasingly strident outcry in France and in
other European nations against Jews and Israel. Some commentators attribute
Europe's stance of not supporting Israel against the Palestinians as
a product of this mass immigration of Muslims to France and other European
nations.

Many of those who oppose Le Pen, are playing a propaganda
game by first pointing out what they consider to be Le Pen's anti-Semitism,
and then with the next breath they bemoan the number of attacks on Jews
in France as though there is a link between Le Pen and the attacks on
Jews. The truth, however, is that the attacks on Jews are coming primarily
from Muslims, not Le Pen supporters. So, the situation is that Le Pen,
who has been smeared as being anti-Jewish, is the one who, if elected,
will help the Jews of France, while his opponent, President Chirac,
with his fuzzy pro-immigration policies will be bad news for the Jews.

In fact, if Le Pen wins the Presidency, he can be expected
to act almost immediately to send Muslim immigrants back to their own
nations, and this would have the effect of weakening their political
influence in France, while increasing the political influence of Jews.
Such a win, would undoubtedly also start similar movements in other
European nations.

It seems unliely that enough Jews will understand what's
at stake, and even if they do, that they will be able to mobilize sufficiently
before the May 5 runoff so that they can bring enough voters to the
polls to elect Le Pen.

It
bears repeating that Le Pen is certainly not the favorite candidate
of Jews, but he's their only hope of changing the course of European
history in favor of the Jews and Israel at this time. For his part,
Le Pen may not want to help the Jews and Israel, but his help is an
automatic corollary of sending the Muslims back to their own countries.

In addition, if Le Pen accomplishes the seemingly impossible
feat of winning the Presidency, his victory will also provide moral support
for strong-border advocates in the United States and other nations as
well as for freedom loving people everywhere.

And when we speak of freedom, we should note that Europe
is presently under an iron heel where white
free speech rights, that we take for granted in the U.S., simply don't
exist. One recent example of the type of tyranny that white people face
in Europe, was demonstrated this week in Norway. In Oslo, Tore Tvedt
was sentenced to 75 days in prison for having political material on
his web site that the local tyrants didn't like. As is usual these days,
the illegal political material had to do with race. It apparently violated
Norway's, anti-racism law, that many people might characterize as being
not only anti-free thought and anti-free speech, but also anti-white
and an aid to those who want white genocide, and who do not want whites
to be able to speak out about such genocide, in the present subtle forms
it is taking, on this brown planet. In sentencing Tvedt, the court stated
that it put special weight on Tevdt's attempts to attract young people
into ant-Semitic and racist beliefs.

Meanwhile,
in England, gopher faced twit, Prime Minister Tony Blair, was angry
that Le Pen said that he was no more racist than Blair. To make his
point, and to show Blair for the phony he is, Le Pen said that if he
is elected President of France, he'd like to set up a special train
to ship immigrants to Britain. Blair, of course, did not agree to take
them. Instead, he had a spokesman call Le Pen some more names, apparently
to divert attention away from the fact that many white people in England
also don't want their country to become non-white.

----MILLARD IS AN IMPORTANT
WRITER- New Nation News--
One of Orange Countys most frightening people, OC
WEEKLY

THE OUTSIDER is an enigmatic and complex
work of fiction wrapped in seeming simplicity. It has elements of the
mystical, the existential, and the transcendental as well as being a
commentary on the PC nature of our times.

The reader is never sure whether the main character
is schizophrenic and is imagining all the events of the story, or whether
he is an avatar and in control of events; or perhaps, he is simply being
meaninglessly blown along through events like a leaf in a breeze. Just
as the reader thinks the story is a straightforward tale, it takes some
subtle and some not so subtle turns into absurdity and meaninglessness
and then back again.