Transcript

2.
Every child, regardless of economic background or social
standing, should have access to quality education.
Every child is unique, creating a fundamental need for teachers
to have the freedom to be innovative problem solvers in the
classroom, setting the example for our children to do the same.
Families should have the ability to choose the best educational
opportunity for their children without having to sacrifice belief
systems or cultural identities.

3.
Common Core is a set of uniform national curriculum standards in
math and language arts (with future iterations for science and social
studies) developed by Washington, D.C. based organizations with
zero accountability to states, schools, or communities.
The concept of suggested national standards is not a bad one.
Common Core and its surrounding requirements eliminate local
control, limit parental involvement, open the door to invasive data
collection, provide little options for reform, and cater to special
interest influence in individual classrooms.

4.
1996 – Achieve, Inc. is formed by the NGA and national corporations.
1998 – Achieve, Inc. begins a national standards and benchmarking project
2001 – Achieve, Inc. sponsors a national summit to determine what ―must
have skills‖ are needed by the nations top employers. Begins working with
Pearson.
2004 – Achieve, Inc. releases ―Ready or Not: Creating a High School Diploma
That Counts‖ identifying a common core of English and Math standards
deemed most needed for success in the workforce.
2007 – Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Eli Broad Foundation pledge
$60 million to the creation of uniform American standards.
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database/Grants/2008/05/OPP50361

5.
2008 – Gates Foundation awards $2.2 million to governors and stakeholders
to promote the adoption of national standards.
2008 – National Governor’s Association, Council of Chief State School
Officers, and Achieve, Inc. write ―Benchmarking for Success‖ funded by the
Gates Foundation.
2009 – Federal Government offers $4.35 billion in Race to the Top Grants
via the ARRA Stimulus Package.
2009 – States must agree to adopt Common Core standards in order to
compete for Race to the Top Funding. Standards have not yet been written
and
adoption does not ensure funds will be awarded.

6.
2009 – Gates Foundation executives are hired to serve as Secretary of
Education Arne Duncan’s Chief of Staff and as head of the Office of
Innovation and Improvement.
June 1, 2009 – Congress’ initial objectives are revised by the Department of
Education to include longitudinal data systems.
March 2010 – The Department of Education releases its ―Blueprint for
Reform‖ in which it states that formula funds, for instance Title I funding, will
now be linked to compliance with national standards.
―Beginning in 2015, formula funds will be available only to states that are
implementing assessments based on college and career ready standards
that are common to a significant number of states.‖
http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/blueprint.pdf

7.
The Creators:
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($163 million investment)
Key staff members hired by Department of Education
The Eli Broad Foundation (Partner in$60 million initial investment)
The GE Foundation/Jeffrey Immelt
The Developers (Common Core Standards Initiative):
National Governor’s Association
Council of Chief State School Officers
Achieve, Inc.
The three groups have received more than $27 million combined
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2007/04/Strong-American-Schools-Campaign-Launches-to-
Promote-Education-Reform-in-2008-Presidential-Election

9.
National Governors Association
The NGA is a D.C. based 501c3 organization funded by federal grants,
state taxpayers, and private organizations. President at the time of
Benchmarking for Success: Janet Napolitano. Received $2.2 million from
The Gates Foundation to promote common standards to governors.
Council of Chief State School Officers
The CCSSO is a ―nonpartisan, nationwide, nonprofit organization‖ based
in Washington, D.C. that ―leads and facilitates collective state action to
transform our public education system in the four strategic areas of
Educator Workforce; Information Systems and Research; Next
Generation Learners; and Standards, Assessment, and Accountability.
Funded by Business Partners such as: Pearson Education, Microsoft,
McGraw Hill, Global Scholar, ETS, Data Recognition Corporation, Apple,
Wireless Generation, Intel, etc.
http://www.ccsso.org/Who_We_Are/Business_and_Industry_Partnerships/Corporate_Partners.html http://www.ccsso.org/

12.
Immelt on China: ―State-run communism may not be your cup of tea, but their
government works. You know?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SKLmHInzDk
GE Chairman of the Board: Jeffrey Immelt
GE Foundation President: Bob Corcoran
Embedded Video File

13.
Pearson is a UK based international corporation offering educational services
across the globe. In their own words, they offer:
―… educational materials, technologies, assessments and related services to
teachers and students of all ages. Though we generate approximately 60% of
our sales in North America, we operate in more than 70 countries. We publish
across the curriculum under a range of respected imprints including Scott
Foresman, Prentice Hall, Addison-Wesley, Allyn and Bacon, Benjamin
Cummings and Longman.
We are also a leading provider of electronic learning programmes and of test
development, processing and scoring services to educational institutions,
corporations and professional bodies around the world.‖
http://www.pearson.com/about-us/education.html

14.
Pearson has come under scrutiny in states like New York and Texas for being
a monopoly on public education.
Because Pearson is involved in the development of standards, curriculum,
and assessments, their materials are also targeted to those items. Meaning,
school districts and individual campuses that purchase all materials from
Pearson stand a better chance of performing well on assessments.
It is not beneficial for any party involved for single corporations to hold such
power over the standards, curriculum, materials, technology, and
assessments used in the classroom.
http://www.edexcellence.net/commentary/education-gadfly-daily/common-core-
watch/2013/pearson-crosses-a-line.html

15.
In April of 2011, Pearson received $3 million in grant funding from The Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation to increase their role in Common Core classroom
implementation by developing ―a full series of digital instructional resources.
Online courses in Math and Reading/English Language Arts will offer a
coherent and systemic approach to teaching the new Common Core State
Standards.‖
Pearson Looks at Big Profits Ahead – Wall Street Journal
"It's a really big deal," says Peter Cohen, CEO of Pearson's K-12 division, Pearson School.
"The Common Core standards are affecting literally every part of the business we're involved
in.―
The Fordham Institute estimates that it will cost states and districts upwards of
$8 billion in materials costs to implement the new standards.
http://www.edexcellence.net/commentary/education-gadfly-daily/common-core-
watch/2013/pearson-crosses-a-line.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303674004577434430304060586.ht
ml

16.
It is funded by The Gates Foundation and Race To The Top grants from the
federal government.
The goal of the SBC?
The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (Smarter Balanced) is a
consortium working to develop next-generation assessments that accurately
measure student progress toward college- and career-readiness. Smarter
Balanced is one of two multistate consortia awarded funding from the U.S.
Department of Education in 2010 to develop an assessment system aligned to the
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) by the
2014-15 school year.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SKLmHInzDk
PARCC – Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College &
Careers
SBC – Smarter Balance Assessment Consortium

17.
Biggest donors: Microsoft, GE, Intel, IBM, ETS, State Farm Insurance,
the Eli Broad Foundation and The Gates Foundation.
In fact, The Gates Foundation gave the Foundation for Excellence in
Education $501, 485 to promote Common Core Standards, which
FEE does on their website extensively including a ―tool-kit‖ of teacher
resources.
In March, Jeb Bush attended a private meeting with Bill and Melinda
Gates, Warren Buffett, Oprah, and Michael Bloomberg (key Common
Core supporters) on Kiawah Island near Charleston, South Carolina.
http://excelined.org/policy-library/common-core-toolkit/
Founder: Jeb Bush, former governor of Florida

18.
inBloom
Formed via $100 million in grant funding by The Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation and The Carnegie Foundation
Created to build systems to track/analyze data collected by school
districts.
Bloomberg reports inBloom will begin charging fees to states and
individual districts in 2015 to use the system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SKLmHInzDk

19.
Amplify
Owned by media giant NewsCorp (Rupert Murdoch)
Received $12.5 million in federal grants from the SBC to develop
classroom resources targeted at implementing Common Core
Standards.
Wireless Generation
Also owned by NewsCorp.
The original entity also hired by the SBC (including Delaware) to
develop systems to track and analyze assessment data. Now Amplify.

20.
But NOT involved in the creation and implementation of
Common Core State Standards:
Parents
Students
Teachers
Campus Administrators
Central Office Administrators
School Board
City Councils
Community Leaders
State Representatives
Photo Courtesy Of: http://memoirvita28.blogspot.com/2013/01/left-out.html

22.
In its 2009 Visioning Document ―Benchmarking for Success‖ the consortium
specifically states that they want to:
Upgrade state standards by adopting a common core of internationally
benchmarked standards in math and language arts.
Leverage states’ collective influence to ensure that textbooks, digital media,
curricula, and assessments are aligned.
Revise state policies for recruiting, preparing, developing, and supporting
teachers and school leaders.
Hold schools and systems accountable through monitoring, interventions,
and support.
Measure state-level performance globally.
http://www.achieve.org/files/BenchmarkingforSuccess.pdf

23.
The document acknowledges setting up national standards:
―Over the long term, the federal government will need to update laws to
align national education policies with lessons learned from state
benchmarking efforts and from federally funded research‖ utilizing ―tightly
aligned instructional tools—from assessments to classroom curriculum
materials.‖
The document specifically mentions competition with nations such as:
Singapore, Germany, China, Brazil, and Korea
The document references the federal governments responsibility to:
Provide states with data systems and longitudinal tracking tools.
http://www.achieve.org/files/BenchmarkingforSuccess.pdf

24.
Dr. Sandra Stotsky
Former Senior Associate Commissioner of Mass. Department of
Education
Served on the Common Core Standards Validation Committee
Refused to sign off on Common Core ELA Standards
―As empty skill sets, Common Core's ELA standards cannot
strengthen the high school curriculum and they cannot reduce
post-secondary remedial coursework in a legitimate way.‖
―Overwhelming focus on skills over content in reading combined
with confusion about the writing standards, lack of detail about
oral presentation, and the sporadic rigor of the media standards.‖
http://truthinamericaneducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Stotsky-testimony-F-020812.pdf

25.
Dr. James Milgrim
Professor Emeritus at Stanford
Served on the Common Core Standards Validation Committee
The ONLY Math expert on the committee
Refused to sign off on Common Core Math Standards
―There are a number of extremely serious failings in Core Standards that
make it premature for any state with serious hopes for improving the
quality of the mathematical education of their children to adopt them. This
remains true in spite of the fact that more than 35 states have already
adopted them.
For example, by the end of fifth grade the material being covered in
arithmetic and algebra in Core Standards is more than a year behind the
early grade expectations in most high achieving countries. By the end of
seventh grade Core Standards are roughly two years behind.‖
http://parentsacrossamerica.org/james-milgram-on-the-new-core-curriculum-standards-in-math/

26.
Qualifications of Committee Members
Dr. Stotsky, Dr. Milgrim and others have questioned why most members
of both standards review committees were testing experts, NOT content
area experts.
One of the sixty members of both committees was a classroom teacher.
Feedback by the committees were filtered by five people.
Members of the validation committee have ―no idea‖ what happened to
their comments after they were returned to the writers. Suggested
revisions were not reflected in the final standards.
http://parentsacrossamerica.org/james-milgram-on-the-new-core-curriculum-standards-in-math/
http://truthinamericaneducation.com/common-core-state-standards/state-led-common-core-
primarily-had-only-five-writers/

27.
Common Core Standards were not presented for review to teachers,
administrators, or a large consortium of educational experts.
Members of committees were hand-picked by special interest groups,
NOT representative of the 45 adopting states.
Comments made by those who did receive the opportunity to review
were not reflected in the final released standards.
How are these state-led reforms when the entire process to develop
them exhibits an utter lack of transparency?
http://www.achieve.org/files/BenchmarkingforSuccess.pdf

28.
Members of the validation committee repeatedly asked for proof of
international benchmarking.
None was ever provided.
No pilot programs were conducted on the standards prior to adoption
and implementation by the states.
Most states adopted the uniform standards before they were written or
approved.
http://truthinamericaneducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Stotsky-testimony-F-020812.pdf

29.
http://www.achieve.org/P-20-data-systems
According to Achieve, Inc.
States must collect, coordinate, and use K-12 and postsecondary data to
track and improve the readiness of graduates to succeed in college and
the workplace.
Longitudinal data systems should follow individual students from grade to
grade and school to school, all the way from kindergarten through
postsecondary education and into the workplace. Such systems would
also provide more accurate measures of dropout and graduation rates, and
provide the foundation for early warning systems.
For states to evaluate and understand the impact of particular policies around
graduation requirements, assessments and preparedness for postsecondary,
they must follow students through K–12 into postsecondary and the
workforce and establish feedback loops to the relevant stakeholders to make
informed decisions that improve policies and practices around increasing
student preparedness.

30.
About the SLDS Grant Program
Better decisions require better information. This principle lies at the heart
of the Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems (SLDS) Grant Program.
Through grants and a growing range of services and resources, the
program has helped propel the successful design, development,
implementation, and expansion of K12 and P-20W (early learning through
the workforce) longitudinal data systems.
These systems are intended to enhance the ability of States to efficiently
and accurately manage, analyze, and use education data, including
individual student records. The SLDSs should help states, districts,
schools, educators, and other stakeholders to make data-informed
decisions to improve student learning and outcomes; as well as to
facilitate research to increase student achievement and close
achievement gaps
http://nces.ed.gov/programs/slds/about_SLDS.asp

31.
What You Might Hear …
Data collection is optional.
Florida hasn’t bought into this system yet.
You have nothing to worry about, they’ll ask before they do this.
But Wait …
According to the Florida Department of Education, the major outcomes of
their 2010 ARRA/RTTP grant are to:
• Upgrade the four major source data systems that are incorporated into
Florida’s Education Data Warehouse (EDW)
• Employ a unique identifier system so that social security numbers are no
longer the key field for tracking students between the Local Education
Agencies and the State
• Provide several different reporting capabilities for use by a myriad of
stakeholders
• Implement a data mining tool for FLDOE to analyze and evaluate its program
and policies more efficiently and effectively
http://www.doe.k12.de.us/EdInsight/

32.
Claim: Under the Federal Rights and Privacy Act student information cannot
be released without prior written consent from a parent or legal guardian.
Reality: ―Buried within the enormous 2009 stimulus bill were provisions
encouraging states to develop data systems for collecting copious
information on public-school kids. To qualify for stimulus money, states had to
agree to build such systems according to federally dictated standards. So all
50 states either now maintain or are capable of maintaining extensive
databases on public-school students.‖
―Last April (2010), the department proposed regulations that would allow it
and other agencies to share a student’s personal information with practically
any government agency or even private company, as long as the disclosure
could be said to support an evaluation of an ―education program,‖ broadly
defined.‖
http://www.doe.k12.de.us/EdInsight/

33.
What can they measure?
In addition to traditional data points, current P-20 system can
collect more than 400 individual pieces of data on students,
including:
Hobbies
Medical Conditions
Learning Disabilities
Religious Affiliations
Family Income
Behavioral Problems
At-Risk Status
Homework Completion
Overall Health Status
Dwelling Arrangements
Career Goals
http://nces.ed.gov/forum/datamodel/eiebrowser/techview.aspx?instance=studentElementarySecondary

34.
In 2011, FERPA was changed to reflect the need to release certain
information to ―outside entities.‖ The changes read:
One exception, which permits disclosure without consent, is
disclosure to school officials with legitimate educational interests. A
school official is a person employed by the school as an administrator,
supervisor, instructor, or support staff member (including health or
medical staff and law enforcement unit personnel) or a person serving on
the school board. A school official may also include a volunteer or
contractor outside of school who performs an institutional service of
function for which the school would otherwise use its own employees and
who is under the direct control of the school with respect to the use and
maintenance of PII from education records such as an attorney, auditor,
medical consultant, or therapist; a parent or student volunteering to serve
on an official committee, such as a disciplinary or grievance committee;
or parent, student, or other volunteer assisting another school official in
performing his or her tasks. A school official has a legitimate educational
interest if the official needs to review an education record in order to
fulfill his or her professional responsibility.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-12-
02/pdf/2011-30683.pdf

35.
You may be told the following:
We don’t have to worry about this – we are an independent school
district.
We set our own curriculum.
We can change this and made it specific to our local needs.
But wait, not so fast.
https://www.box.com/shared/t1ykvgr99mha82eokykk

36.
Common Core State Standards are privately owned and
copyrighted by the NGA and the CCSSO.
Common set of K-12 standards means a set of content standards
that define what students must know and be able to do, and that are
identical across all States in a consortium. Notwithstanding this, a
State may supplement the common standard with additional
standards, provided that the additional standards do not exceed 15
percent of the State’s total content standards for that subject area.
--Federal Register July 29, 2009
https://www.box.com/shared/t1ykvgr99mha82eokykk

37.
What does this mean?
Local school boards can alter the standards – but 85% of them
MUST be what is used in the classroom.
Districts may use altered standards BUT students will still be
assessed only on Common Core aligned assessments – not the
fifteen percent of information that was changed/altered.
If problems arise with the standards, who is responsible? Who will
advocate for the children when it’s a private organization that owns
the standards and the power? A private organization accountable to
special interest groups, not parents and teachers.
https://www.box.com/shared/t1ykvgr99mha82eokykk

38.
It is estimated, based on studies by the Pioneer Institute, that ―one-
time costs, year one operational costs, and ongoing costs for years 2
to 7,‖ of implementing all of the programs associated with Race to the
Top and Common Core will reach $15.8 billion divided between
participating states AFTER Race to the Top Funding is utilized.
http://schoolfunding.info/2012/07/reports-confirm-the-costs-of-implementing-common-core/

40.
Obama’s recently introduced ―Preschool for All‖ Program
Focuses on early child education (3-5 years of age)
Includes longitudinal data systems for daycares and preschool programs.
P-20 Workforce Database
Race to the Top Grants
Health and Human Services Partnerships
Emphasizes importance of home visits
Common Standards
Suggests raising sales taxes to continue funding after grant money is
allocated
http://www.doe.k12.de.us/rttt/files/initiatives/ELCRTTT.pdf