> That it is not a build time dependency and therefore only needed during> runtime. I thought the pathes of programs during compile time do not> matter since the build host and the host where it gets installed differ> when cross compiling.
OK I see its a runtime dependency( not compile time/configure time) then
its ok but I think we need to have iceauth in RDEPENDS too I think.

Am Sonntag, den 20.03.2011, 11:01 -0700 schrieb Khem Raj:
> > That it is not a build time dependency and therefore only needed during> > runtime. I thought the pathes of programs during compile time do not> > matter since the build host and the host where it gets installed differ> > when cross compiling.> > OK I see its a runtime dependency( not compile time/configure time) then > its ok but I think we need to have iceauth in RDEPENDS too I think.
Yes, `iceauth` is already included into `RDEPENDS` and I left it there.
Thanks,
Paul

On Wednesday 23 March 2011 08:14:22 Koen Kooi wrote:
> On 23-03-11 01:33, Andreas Mueller wrote:> > Anyway: In 'xfce4-session' / config.log I found:> > | configure:15972: checking for iceauth> > | configure:15990: found */usr/bin/iceauth*> > | configure:16002: result: /usr/bin/iceauth> > > > So - as Khem suggested - and with xfce4-session: RDEPENDS_${PN}="iceauth" I:> > - changed iceauth to extent to iceauth-native.> > - changed xfce4-session: DEPENDS = "iceauth-native ..."> > No, it only wants to probe for the PATH of the binary to encode into the> result. We do NOT want target binaries to point to your builddir instead> of ${bindir}.> > As I said before, Pauls patch does the right thing.
Got it - sorry for the noise - have an ACK on Paul's patch :-)
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 01:51:38 Paul Menzel wrote:
> I did not check that. But why does not `RDEPENDS` pull that in?
If I would understand that... But I think that is what happened to you in
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-March/030721.html
xfce4-settings has iceauth in DEPENDS & RDEPENDS since long time..
> Have you run tested that? As far as I understood that path is put into> the resulting binary and, if I am not mistaken, the path will be> `/usr/bin/iceauth` on the target system.
now yes - it failed - see above..
> > > Since xfce4.6 means huge rebuild for me (and I did only pick up what Khem> > suggested): Can anybody test this for xfce_session_4.6.{1, 2} and create> > the patches?> > Could you send me the patch to get the native recipe for Xfce 4.8?
Sorry - but what do you mean with *native* recipe for Xfce 4.8?
Andreas

Am Mittwoch, den 23.03.2011, 09:35 +0100 schrieb Andreas Mueller:
> On Wednesday 23 March 2011 08:14:22 Koen Kooi wrote:> > On 23-03-11 01:33, Andreas Mueller wrote:
[…]
> > > Since xfce4.6 means huge rebuild for me (and I did only pick up what Khem> > > suggested): Can anybody test this for xfce_session_4.6.{1, 2} and create> > > the patches?> > > > Could you send me the patch to get the native recipe for Xfce 4.8?> Sorry - but what do you mean with *native* recipe for Xfce 4.8?
You wrote that you had adapted/extended(?) `xfce-session_4.8.*.bb` to
build a native package(?) (sorry). So I wanted to just see your
`xfce-session_.4.8.*.bb` to know what to do.
Thanks,
Paul