Category: Creation Worldviews

If ‘science’ and ‘all those scientists’ have shown evolution to be valid, how can anyone claim otherwise? Much of the resistance we meet in the creation science ministry is vaguely based upon this sort of notion. It is fairly easy … Continue reading →

The number of impact craters on Earth is almost negligible compared to Mars and the moon. Can erosion explain this? Scientists have estimated that there must be about 340 undiscovered meteor craters on the Earth, Science Daily reports. Only 188 have been … Continue reading →

R.N. from the UK writes: I am a 6 day young earth creationist like yourselves, and look forward to reading Jonathan Sarfati’s “The Genesis Account”. I remember reading somewhere that Jesus quoted x amount of times from Gen. 1–11, but … Continue reading →

New science directly challenges the millions-of-years dogma scattered throughout the blockbuster movie Jurassic World. The spring 2015 edition of the Creation Research Society Quarterly (CRSQ) is a special issue that focuses on the investigation of dinosaur proteins inside fossil bones. The last article in … Continue reading →

The truth of creation is a theme running through the whole of the Holy Scriptures. In Genesis we have the basic statements of God creating the heavens and the earth in the beginning, and some details of His work in … Continue reading →

Evolutionists continue to push the idea that bigger brains offer better fitness, despite repeated empirical problems. “It’s not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog,” an old proverb goes. Similarly, … Continue reading →

As we reported in April, the pro-Darwin media love to print triumphalist articles, declaring on the thinnest of evidence that the “creationists” are deathly scared of the latest discoveries in science. Now New Scientist takes a turn, claiming that the E. coli research of Richard … Continue reading →

Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal announced his candidacy for President yesterday, and he faces a challenge in distinguishing himself in an already overpopulated field of Republican aspirants. Insofar as he succeeds in doing so, you can bet he’ll have the Louisiana Science Education … Continue reading →

Using an observable data set as a stand-in for a theoretical model can be misleading, as several new geology papers illustrate. An ice core is pulled up from Greenland or Antarctica. Scientists measure oxygen isotopes at various levels. Do the … Continue reading →

Dr Steven Austin1 has proposed an explanation for the formation of multiple coal beds separated by other sedimentary rocks. He originally presented this in his Ph.D. thesis at the prestigious Penn State University in 1979. Dr Austin’s explanation shows that such … Continue reading →

Despite the materialist mindset of our scientific culture, evidence continues to support human exceptionalism and Biblical morality. Father’s parenting is unique and valuable, according to this article on Live Science about research done at Washington State. The differences in parenting styles between … Continue reading →

Why do all the mainstream science journals and reporters give a leftist slant? That’s not very scientific. Science is supposed to be about “is” not “ought”. Individual scientists are free to have political opinions, but it is misleading and even … Continue reading →

Our friends over at The Stream appear to have read Pope Francis’ encyclical, Laudato Si’, more carefully than some premature pundits. They point out “11 Things You Probably Won’t Hear about Pope Francis’ Encyclical.” Two of those are particularly relevant to our concerns … Continue reading →

Over at The Conversation, Peter Ellerton rightly points out that “How a debate is framed can change the point at issue.” Ellerton, who is Lecturer in Critical Thinking at the University of Queensland, uses intelligent design as an example of how framing can … Continue reading →

Darwinian evolution is characterized by an utter lack of guidance; it is the “blind watchmaker” of Dawkins. It doesn’t know where it’s going. It doesn’t know it is building a watch. It doesn’t know what a watch is. There is … Continue reading →

Recently an atheist student emailed me to ask how it’s reasonable to claim that an “unobserved designer” is responsible for complex features of nature, like high CSI (complex specified information) and irreducibly complex structures. In reply, I explained that first … Continue reading →

Crumbling seaside cliffs at Whitby in northern England continuously reveal new fossils. Most of them are remains of small plants and animals, but researchers from the University of Manchester described a much larger fossil: a giant vertebra from a sauropod’s … Continue reading →

A recent paper in Nature‘s journal Scientific Reports, “Extraordinarily Adaptive Properties of the Genetically Encoded Amino Acids,” has found that the twenty amino acids used by life are finely tuned to explore “chemistry space” and allow for maximal chemical reactions. Considering that … Continue reading →

With his blog Why Evolution Is True and now a new book pushing atheism, our old friend Jerry Coyne, Censor of the Year for 2014, provides a perennial source of interest and entertainment. The National Geographic Society must think that if one censor … Continue reading →

Stars have fascinated people from ancient times, as one of the most striking features of the night sky. Modern science has found many interesting facts about stars—in some cases, catching up with what God revealed in Scripture thousands of years … Continue reading →