Modern singles with old school values

Pregnant from Oral. Father Still Has to Pay

The urban legend of getting “trapped” by a kid just went up a notch. A woman is forcing a man to pay child support for a baby she had without his knowledge. How did she do it? She performed oral, saved the sperm, put it in a tube, and impregnated herself.

Obviously, her former love is outraged that the woman is attempting to receive financial assistance for a child that he not only had no knowledge about, but also was not exactly a willing participant in creating. He would like to claim theft, but can’t, since the law states he did willingly give his sperm away, even if it wasn’t in the natural way a baby is made.

The woman: Dr. Sharon Irons, accused of a “calculated, profound personal betrayal.” The man: Dr. Richard O. Phillips, suing for emotional distress as he was ordered to pay $800 a month in child support after a paternity suit that Dr. Irons filed proved he was the father of her child. Dr. Phillips had no idea about the child for almost two years. The child is now 5-years-old.

Fraud and theft claims have been dismissed by lower and higher courts. Apparently, there’s a thin line between deceitfully engaging in physical acts and consensual relations.

According to the law, Dr. Phillips’ sperm wasn’t stolen; it was given away, for Dr. Irons to use as she pleased.

The ruling stated, “When [the] plaintiff ‘delivered’ his sperm, it was a gift — an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a done. There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request.”

There is no word on whether or not Dr. Phillips is an active participant in the child’s life, as he continues to state that he feels “trapped in a nightmare”.

What do you think? Should Dr. Phillips have to pay or is this an outrageous crime committed against him?

The way I see it the kid as always will suffer the most from all this.

I don’t think she is fit to be a mother so really the courts should be considering getting the kid away from her, not awarding her more money.

And the father, even though unwilling in all this. He should either step up to receive custody of the kid and get it away from the evil mother or back a motion to get the kid put into the hands of a family that will care and love for it.

Sounds like he was just a player anyway. All he wanted was a bj. He’s probably one of those types that just play with woman. I don’t have pity. Also now there’s a child involved. He’s selfish and only thinking of himself not the child. Its not the kids fault. The parents are screwed up

Confucius once said, its better to be quiet and have people think you’re stupid than to open your mouth and confirm it……obviously, you didn’t get that memo. Whether he’s a “player” or not has nothing to do with her malicious act. More importantly, when did accountability become optional? She intentionally did this w/out his consent (theft) and the fact that “he only wanted a BJ” is proof positive you never knew that RIF.