Genocide advocate Ayelet Shaked revives Peres plan for West Bank

In a secret audio recording taken during the closed event, Shaked can be heard seeking to revive a discredited idea long championed by Shimon Peres, the leading Israeli politician who died this week.

The idea is that a deal could be struck with Jordan to push Palestinians under its jurisdiction as Israel maintains effective control over the occupied West Bank.

A key objective behind Peres’ plan – the so-called Jordanian option – was to sideline the Palestine Liberation Organization and neuter Palestinian resistance to Israel. Palestinians saw it as an affront to their right of self-determination.

Shaked denies Israel is an occupier, claiming that the West Bank is merely “territory under dispute.”

“Last week I met [with] Facebook management and Google and now they’re willing to do proactive steps,” Shaked states. The recording was obtained by The Electronic Intifada.

“We asked from them to monitor by themselves the incitement in social media, the social networks, like they are doing to child pornography,” Shaked says.

According to Shaked, the threat of legislation is making the companies “more cooperative and they are now actually agreeing to do proactive steps in order to try and reduce the amount of incitement [on] the Internet.”

Facebook later apologized, claiming it had made a mistake. But the Palestinian publications believe the suspensions were related to Facebook’s dealings with the Israeli government.

In July, Shaked and Gilad Erdan, Israel’s public security minister, introduced a bill allowing courts to order social media companies to remove content considered a “danger to personal, public or state security.”

Shaked and Erdan criticized Facebook for not removing enough content that they claim promotes “terrorism.”

There is no indication that Facebook has censored Israeli political or religious leaders.

Peaceful protest

Shaked was invited to campus by the Columbia Law Israel Organization to talk about her role as justice minister.

The event “was advertised through closed listservs and [was] exclusive to law students,” according to Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), though The Electronic Intifada was told that several law professors also attended.

After an opaque screening process, only about a dozen students and professors were allowed to attend the event, students told The Electronic Intifada.

While Shaked met with the group, student activists protested her appearance.

They held signs and handed out fliers highlighting her racist statements.

Students protested Ayelet Shaked during an event at Columbia Law School. (Columbia University Students for Justice in Palestine)

“[The protest] was more about making a statement of solidarity and not about obstructing the event,” Columbia Law student Rachel LaFortune told The Electronic Intifada.

Law student Sami Cleland added that the protesters wanted to provide a counterpoint to Shaked’s views.

Challenged

In the audio recording, Shaked and an unidentified colleague are challenged by attendees over the government’s definition of incitement versus free speech, Israel’s adherence to international law and the legal validity of settlements.

Shaked refers to the occupied West Bank as “Judea and Samaria,” the name used by the Israeli government and hardline Zionists to assert biblical legitimacy for Israel’s occupation.

“According to the international law, Judea and Samaria are not occupied territory but they are territory under dispute,” she claims.

In reality, Israel has abused international law to implement control over the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip to fit its own needs.

Israel’s settlements in the West Bank amount to war crimes. Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, Israel is forbidden from transferring its own civilian population into land it has occupied since 1967.

Shaked also suggests that Israel annex “Area C” of the West Bank. This is the designation given to around 60 percent of the West Bank under the 1993 Oslo agreements where Israel retains full military and civilian control.

Most of Israel’s settlements are in Area C and Shaked estimates that about 90,000 Palestinians live there.

“We said we should annex this area and of course give full citizenship to those Palestinians,” she says. “Israel can handle 90,000 Palestinians to be part of Israel and full citizens of Israel.”

In areas A and B, where the Palestinian Authority either has nominal administration or shared administration with Israel, Shaked suggested that millions of Palestinians be pushed under Jordanian jurisdiction.

“There should be an autonomy maybe one day that would be with consideration with Jordan – we don’t know what will happen in the area. And this is the solution in my mind,” she states.

Listen to the full audio recording via the media player above.

Attacks on BDS

The day before her Columbia appearance, Shaked spoke at a conference for the Jewish National Fund, an Israeli government-backed agency that works to displace Palestinians from their land.

Comments

“We said we should annex this area and of course give full citizenship to those Palestinians,” she says. “Israel can handle 90,000 Palestinians to be part of Israel and full citizens of Israel.”

Liar. They illegally annexed East Jerusalem, but never gave full citizenship to those Palestinians. Why then should we believe that they would give full citizenship to Palestinians residing in Area C?

“There should be an autonomy maybe one day that would be with consideration with Jordan – we don’t know what will happen in the area. And this is the solution in my mind,” she states.

Jordan doesn't want any more Palestinians. And Israel would be foolish to start another war with Jordan to try to foist off millions of Palestinians to Jordan. The idea is a complete non-starter, no country in the international community would accept such an attempt by Israel.

Israel with its occupation of the West Bank is already essentially one state, an apartheid state.

There are good reasons why Peres' "Jordanian option" never came to fruition. Palestinians did not then and will not now accept the imposition of any form of Jordanian authority, even in a care-taker capacity, much less a national settlement disposing of their homeland. What Shaked is proposing is a mechanism for the political absorption of the indigenous population and territory of the West Bank into either of two foreign states- ie the final partition of Palestine. The fragmented nature of the enclaves to be awarded to Jordan would render impossible any effort at central government or integrated policy with Amman. And that's assuming the Jordanian state would accept such a suicide mission. Meanwhile, virtually all of the West Bank- including the entire border with Jordan, by the way- would be annexed to Israel.

Can anyone think of a reason why this "solution" should not be buried with Peres himself?

Abbas & MULTIPLE members of Hamas leadership have Jordanian citizenship.

It is fact and unchallengeable. I challenge ANYONE & EVERYONE to look this up & prove me wrong. Retiring political bureau head of Hamas, in Qatar, has Jordanian citizenship. His MOTHER lives there as of now.