Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat weblog has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, info-tech and privacy/confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. The team is David Brophy, Birgit Clark, Merpel, Jeremy Phillips, Eleonora Rosati, Darren Smyth, Annsley Merelle Ward and Neil J. Wilkof. You're welcome to read, post comments and participate in our community. You can email the Kats here

For the half-year to 30 June 2015, the IPKat's regular team is supplemented by contributions from guest bloggers Suleman Ali, Tom Ohta and Valentina Torelli.

Regular round-ups of the previous week's blogposts are kindly compiled by Alberto Bellan.

Thursday, 13 September 2012

The computer games industry has changed dramatically since this Kat enjoyed many an hour on Sensible Soccer and Cannon Fodder. That those titles still have a cult following two decades after their first release is testament to their originality (despite one being a football game).

Nowadays, the Call of Duty series, currently in its ninth iteration, incurs around $250 million in development and marketing costs for each release. That places the game in the league of Hollywood films. The publishers know that if they get it right then the rewards are even larger, for example 'Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3' released in November 2011 earned sales of $1 billion in 16 days beating Avatar to become the biggest entertainment launch of all time. Things have come a long way in the forty years since Pong.However, the largest software developers are now accused of simply churning out the same old titles, just with more bells and whistles rather than investing in innovation. That is a natural reflection of the tendency of businesses to become more risk-averse as the investment at stake increases, but it is lamentable nonetheless.This lack of innovation at the 'top' end of the market is unfortunately mirrored by the games published at the bottom end. These cheaper [you mean free - Merpel] games occupy a corner of the internet where in a few short years social media, mobile gaming and universal online access have allied to disrupt computer game economics so significantly that unless a game can be monetised, it is unlikely to be produced, even if it is more fun. That has stifled innovation and led to claims of copyright infringement by Electronic Arts against Zynga for imitation of game genres (see 1709 blogpost here).Ironically however, it is this stagnation which has provided the catalyst for creativity. Those games developers who are willing to be innovative not only in their game design but in their project funding have turned to crowdfunding to source finance for their projects through websites like Kickstarter.

The kickstart must be around here somewhere.

By pitching ideas to the world, businesses can maximise their audience [ratherlike a digital Dragons' Den open to the public then] and ensure the financial side of things is efficient enough to accept micro-payments. The site has been especially popular among computer games developers (as noted by The Economist). Indeed, six of the top-ten funded projects relate to the games industry and each of them has raised over $1 million from pledges of as little as one dollar.Zooming in for a closer look, it is good to see that the projects are for game genres which have been largely ignored in recent years but which were once popular, such as point and click adventures (think The Secret of Monkey Island). Blind nostalgia is one thing but for the bigger publishers to take notice we need to see some commercial success. Let's hope Kickstarter lives up to its name.More IPKat computer games industry economics here.

The IPKat's sidebar contents

Want to complain?If you feel that you have been unfairly prevented from posting a comment on one of this weblog's features, here's what you can do about it

The IPKat's cousins: some IP-friendly blogs for youThe IPKat lists his 'family' of IP blogs, some of which focus on specific rights, geographical zones, markets or interests

How many page-views?See how many times the pages of the IPKat weblog have been purr-viewed

The Kat that tweetsToo short to blog? Some news and views are still worth airing, thanks to Twitter

Want to receive the IPKat weblog by email?You can get each post, or a digest, sent direct to your favourite mailbox

Not just any old IPKatEvery so often, this feline creeps into the limelight

The IPKat's RSS feeding arrangementsFeedburner and all those other things ...

What you've been sayingHere are the most recent readers' comments on the IPKat's posts

The IPKat's Greatest Hits!Here are the five posts on the IPKat's weblog that have received the most attention from readers over the past 30 days

Has the Kat got your tongue?Some translation facilities for readers whose first language is not English, or who are just plain masochistic

Creative Commons licenceYou too can make use of this blog's contents, if you follow the rules

The IPKat ArchiveAncient posts, going back to June 2003

Want to complain?

If you have posted a comment to one of our blogposts and it hasn't appeared, it may be because it doesn't match our criteria for moderation -- essentially that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should be relevant to the blogpost on which they purport to comment.

If you feel that your comment should have been moderated, please email the IPKat at theipkat@gmail.com and let him know, since it may be that your comment has been misdirected into the Blogger software's Spam file.

In the event that there has been no software malfunction and that your post has been rejected, if you want to appeal against this decision please contact either (i) Dr Danny Friedmann of theIP Dragonweblog (ipdragon@gmail.com) or (ii) Professor Dennis Crouch of the Patently-O weblog (dcrouch@patentlyo.com). Danny or Dennis will review your complaint, preserving the confidentiality of your identity and will let both you and us know whether your complaint is justified.

If your complaint relates to bias or distortion, the IPKat suggests that you contact him initially, bearing in mind that he and Merpel are generally willing to host pieces by guest contributors even when their opinions are at odds with those of this blog's contributors.