The sad thing about this is that there are plenty of real grownup critiques of the US default interventionist foreign policy, of which Hillary is a strong advocate. But the "which of your children are you willing to sacrifice!" or hysterically inflating the list of HRC's policy failures isn't a grownup discussion.

I provided multiple facts so far you only relied on logical fallacies to disprove it .You should read what I post before posting. But since you want to talk in regard to her polices you have not even provided a single fact or proof where she has not lead or backed up a neocon policy aiming to destabilize middle east, [creating a humanitarian crisis in the process ] in favor or Israel , sending usa in countless wars and proxy wars ,where she has not supported, advocated or involved herself. Is a politician and a presidential candidate, is not some one from the road not know what she is voting and advocating. If she is going to pick hard line neocons as policy makers in new team and declared so, and actually worked with them before, and on top advocated, promoted this polices herself and is continuing same legacy now, wtf you want people to expect from her when she get elected?

I like the idea of stealing lawful remittances of immigrants. There is a ton of economic research that shows this is the best foreign aid and is far more effective than government payments. We should probably definitely try to disincent those things.