By equalizikg it with getting covered in liquid you are over amd over. I dont expect you to understand at this point.there is context to what is said.
He blasted her on twitter forever, he is already dry.

It's amazing to see the degree some people will go in providing a false narrative. In this one thread I've been accused of beating women, approving
of violence, approving of assault against another person over ideology, taking this guys side, etc. Most of those on more than one occasion with me
asking for proof of those accusations which nobody can provide.

And people wonder why everyone seems so violent today. Well, I can guess why.

The problem in this thread it that while some people wish to also hold her accountable for her actions, others erroneously assume they simultaneously
condone—and thereby exempt—his own online behavior.

He was wrong for his postings, but she was also wrong because SHE is the one who turned it into a physical encounter.

And she is also not justified.

They are both wrong, but some people can't admit it because they feel someone *has* to be "in the right."

The same childish crap argument I've seeing a lot lately: "But...HE did it FIRST! Wahhh" or Well, HE started it!" Sound familiar?

originally posted by: DrakeINFERNO
By equalizikg it with getting covered in liquid you are over amd over. I dont expect you to understand at this point.there is context to what is said.
He blasted her on twitter forever, he is already dry.

I think the problem in this thread is that it was a Trump sticker being discussed, which turned him into a "snowflake" and her into a "Trump
Supporter". From there, its not about right or wrong, its about "right" or "left". Because the story is written, and we are dumb enough to act it
out over and over and over. While acknowledging we are dumb enough to keep playing it out over and over and over.

Its the damndest thing. Now I see why people could believe in all the silly superstitions long ago.

he put her up on twitter saying he was going to destroy her property and your weak ass liberal defense is she threw water on him AFTER the post is
assault.

That's because she did commit assault. Trump supporters seem to have problems understanding the basic things.

A threat is a threat and action can be taken whether on twitter or not and I cant believe 15k idiots retweeted that.

Actually no you cannot take any psychical action against the person that made the threat. The most you can do is report it to the authorities. If you
take any psychical action against that person then you are the one breaking the law.

You weak liberals are always getting butthurt and taking action over words and water tossing is assault now?

Liberals can take lessons on how to act butthurt and advanced whining courses from the Trumpeteers.

Please go to Canada!

Isn't there some nice little fascist nation that will welcome Trump and his followers?

originally posted by: DrakeINFERNO
Its pretty cut and dry, he doesnt create a threatening environment for a female peer bu inciting viollence, he doesnt have to dry himself off or let
evaporation take place.

lol if you think a cup of water is assault you have lived a very shelted life.

Legally, it is. He did threaten her, but the response should have been to alert campus security. I am pretty sure the school would agree.

There's no equivalence here.
She was wronged greatly by this miserable little coward. Probably scared half to death by all the baying of his ilk on social media.
Throwing a cup of water or whatever on him was a tiny bit of restitution for the hurt he put on her.

Frankly, he deserved a proper kicking for that. No bs telling off by a counsellor or something. A proper lesson in the consequences of such awful
behaviour.

Forums like this are the place to get antsy over politics, not a university library and never with the total lack of respect for someone that you'd
threaten violence on them or their property for a political view.

Ah, the political he said, she said game. No you are! No you are! Blah blah blah.

Trump is thin skinned and his supporters are following suit.

Liberals are think skinned because they can't handle conservative bigotry or whatever.

How is it thin skinned of the woman to have a trump sticker on her computer? seems like if sh ewas she would not have it on there.
SO this woman is threatened with a violent assault for her political views and that sok to you? So you are fine with free speech being stifled as
long as its someone you disagree with i assume right? Hypocritical much?

Sheesh. I support free speech and th e right to pursue what makes you happy. HE would violate her rights by smashing her computer and just because she
likes trump you would excuse it. pitiful. just pitiful.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.