Knight is a career backup who has no defined NBA skill as of yet. Hes not a good passer, hes an average shooter at best, his defence isn't that good, and he's not a leader at PG. Comparing him to Rondo, let alone saying you'd much rather have him over Rondo is blasphemous.

Drummond on the other hand has shown flashes of becoming one of the best centers in the NBA very very soon. He's only 19 years old. You shouldn't be trading a player of his potential and talent level at that position for anything but the elite. That comment isn't out of this realm.

Trade proven soon too be hall of famers in their prime (or just entering) for a dude in his sophomore year that's shown flashes of being something? That comment was fine until he connected those names to it - absurdity at it's best.