Is my device lacking a DOS node "object" to be dismounted with release Final Edition ?

Is there a new "dismount" DOS packet to respond?

There is a SYS:C/Dismount command and there is a new packet to respond to. I did some work on a filesystem device but don't know how a console should handle the new packet. You can check dos.dospackets.doc in SDK:Documentation/AutoDocs. I don't know much else.

After reading the autodocs for the ACTION_DIE & ACTION_SHUTDOWN packets and the DismountDevice() function, I get the impression that ram: may not be completely updated to OS4 AmigaDOS standards. I could be wrong and if Colin is reading this maybe he can explain.

After reading the autodocs for the ACTION_DIE & ACTION_SHUTDOWN packets and the DismountDevice() function, I get the impression that ram: may not be completely updated to OS4 AmigaDOS standards. I could be wrong and if Colin is reading this maybe he can explain.

The dismounting ability of ram-handler is switchable, I use it as a test handler for devolopment, it's off by default.If you want to play, then in a shell type; sys:Kickstart/ram-handler.kmod ?(The RESET option puts it all back to defaults.)

And, the reason CON: is not consistent is a bug in the "Assign dismount" emulation, but only with the con-handler.Besides, you should be using c:dismount anyway, i'll probably remove that awfull assign kludge for the V54 release.I have no idea who thought it would be a good idea to bolt a device dismounting feature onto a command thatwas primarily designed to handle assignments.

Thank you xenic, I found this dismount command on C: and it works well (under AOSFE also) ;Thank broadblues for testing ; it really helps me, on the way ;Thank you Colin (or the Asgard from the serie? ) for your insight reflexion, thank you.DGILLES