I may have missed a lot but does all this come from legends told by a French cult and the "Gospel of Mary" found in 1898? Not surprisingly, I'm
having a little trouble with it. Here's one verse that stood out for me:

Blessed are you that you did not waver at the sight of Me. For where the mind is there is the treasure.

Where the mind is? Jesus is
emphasizing the mind? Where does that come from?

But anyway, what really concerned me was the gospel itself. As the OP's source indicates, of the nine chapters five are entirely missing. Of the
remaining four, only one is intact. One is missing most of the chapter, another is missing about a third, and an unknown percentage of another is
gone.

Maybe it's just me, but that's too big a hole to ignore. It looks like two-thirds of the gospel is missing.

I have to wonder if that Skull the Knights Templars had, was really the Skull of Jesus? Is it possible that the KT had this Skull, and that was what
the Church feared? Proof that Jesus' body didn't acend into Heaven like they advertise could be very bad for the Churches beliefs that they pushed
onto people.

I'm sorry, I'm really confused. The gospel wasn't found until 1898 in Egypt. Are you implying that Constantine edited them (unlike other gospels
which were just denounced as fake) then buried them in Egypt where they sat for 1500 years? And no one has ever found any other copies of it? I'm
fuzzy today, and must have misunderstood you.

We've got copies of dozens of other gnostic gospels. If this one was surpressed because it is true, doesn't that imply that the rest were allowed
to exist becuse they aren't true? Isn't it just as possible that this one is a relatively recent fake?

I think we are confusing each other lol.
I am talking about Constantine picking and choosing what went in the Bible at the council of Nicaea in 325 AD, did he choose the wrong gospels to go
in it to control what was being said?
The OP says the Resurrection was added later to the Gospels to make Jesus more God like and not a man which he was.
It amazes me people can say it is all the word of God when it was written by men after the death of Jesus.

It's worth noting that the Gallician Church, the first church of France before Roman Catholicism was established from Asia Minor as that is were the
trading routes of Massila, the largest city were concerned with.

Undoubtedly, from theearliest planting of Christianity in Gaul, many of its adherents would have relatives in AsiaMinor, inasmuch as Massilia,
which soon ex-tended its territory's influence, was an colony from Phocaea in Asia Minor.

Constant intercourse would in consequence be kept up between the two countries, and the intimacy may be thus naturally accounted for Again, if the
earlier date (A.D. 155) of the Gallican persecution be correct

The Golden Legend, which first has recorded mention of its aspects around the 6th century affirms this historic connection of the city to the Near
East, thus the connections between Ephesus at which Mary Magdalene was understood as having gone to by the early church and her subsequent arrival in
France.

the basis for the French cult having a probable early basis.

The text of the Mary Magdalene gospel seems quite straight forward, as far as Gnostic texts go, and place importance on the mind as the intermediary
between the soul and spirit...or if you like ;it's all in the head'

Blessed are you that you did not waver at the sight of Me. For where the mind is there is the treasure.

10) I said to Him, Lord, how does he who sees the vision see it, through the soul or through the spirit?

11) The Savior answered and said, He does not see through the soul nor through the spirit, but the mind that is between the two that is what sees the
vision and it is

I think we are confusing each other lol.
I am talking about Constantine picking and choosing what went in the Bible at the council of Nicaea in 325 AD, did he choose the wrong gospels to go
in it to control what was being said?

Argh.

The Council of Nicaea had NOTHING to do with the selection of Biblical canon. Absolutely nothing. We have the records of what that Council was
about, and the Bible wasn't it.

This is the third time I've posted that today... is there some "Dan Brown pill" that everyone is taking?

The OP says the Resurrection was added later to the Gospels to make Jesus more God like and not a man which he was.

OP is wrong -- the post-resurrection appearances of Christ were added to the Gospel of Mark after the initial release, but it always contained
the resurrection itself, and the other three Gospels do not have anything added to them in the same fashion. Speculation is that the last bit of Mark
was added after the fact because the original author had ended it rather suddenly and there was a demand for "the rest of the story", which was then
lifted from the other Gospels.

This is nothing but another version of the mother of Horus wife of Osiris superimposed on the story of Jesus.

The skull represents the dead body parts in whole. We see her in many of these paintings as Isis chief morner for the dead, i.e her dead husband, and
collector of body parts. In fact the skull here could be a phallic symbol representing the one part of Osiris that baby never found and his death
which she morns endlessly.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.