Family attorney, Ken Meleyco, told KTXL-TV that “the girl is not doing good” since the alleged 2016 rape because “she’s showing all the symptoms of somebody who’s been molested. She’s gonna be in counseling all her life.” He also claimed that Burgess received the comparatively light sentence because “wealthy people, time and time again, escape the penalty for what they did.”

The Bee reports that the sentence was agreed to by prosecutors and approved by the family, but blame was heaped on the judge who told the court that he was “somewhat limited” in changing a negotiated sentence:

Burgess’s attorney claims that the elderly man maintains his innocence and believes the girl’s family was motivated by greed. The family is also suing the owner of Rare Parts, Inc., an auto part manufacturing company, in civil court.

There hasn’t been this much outrage at a sentence since Stanford University student Brock Turner was sentenced to only six months in prison after being found guilty of raping a drunk female student. The judge in that case, Aaron Persky, is the target of a recall campaign in California’s June primary election.

But California’s outrage may be somewhat self-inflicted. Since 2011, California criminal penalties have been eased by the state legislature and the voters themselves in order to reduce prison overcrowding.

California’s lax laws are so notorious that a drunk young woman who livestreamed the car crash that killed her sister bragged to the Fresno County Sheriff’s Deputy that the new laws would “cut her time in half.”