Tag Archives: Palestinian Arabs

Hours after stabbings, “moderate” Fatah calls for more jihad

FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…This whole Palestinian Arab movement is returning to its Nazi roots. The person who founded “Palestinianism” was without any doubt Hajj Amin el Husseini who stoked up Jew Hatred continually from 1920 inside the British Mandate, during those long 20 years until 1939.

In 1941 Hajj Amin el Husseini actually travelled across to Berlin and Germany to meet with Hitler. He formed a very close relationship with Eichmann in the Holocaust of the Jews and was an even worse Nazi than Eichmann was.

After the war he should have been hung and the Serbs of Yugoslavia requested he be tried at Nuremburg with the other Nazi leaders in the Nuremburg Trials (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_trials) but the French arranged his escape.

He then (with other Nazis in Egypt) proceeded to mentor Arafat and Abbas and thus the continuity between the present Palestinian Arabs and the Nazis is established.

It is there (the continuity) in fact. How can it be denied? Why would it be hidden?

This excellent report from Jihadwatch gives more details of this in the present. The report lends weight to our Trotskyist position which is that to survive Israel must protect its Jews in Israel by destroying these movements Fatah, Hamas and others.

Their leaders must be arrested and given public trials of the type that Eichmann was given because there is no difference. This is historical fact, is the present analysis based on that historical fact, and as Trotskyists we maintain that this will not be refuted.

But this is all empty talk without a new leadership among the Jews of Israel and spreading into the ranks of the Diaspora.

The Palestinian Authority (PA)’s ruling Fatah party has uploaded a number of posts encouraging incitement against Israelis and Jews in the past several hours, the Government Press Office revealed Wednesday.

Hours after a Palestinian Arab terrorist embarked on a stabbing spree in the heart of Tel Aviv, Fatah uploaded this photo to its page promoting more terror:

Caption: “We started with stones and will end with a state.” Fatah Facebook page

The photo shows a number of means of committing terror attacks, including the rocks, knives, Molotov cocktails, guns, grenades, and various rifles.

Both Tuesday and Wednesday, Fatah uploaded photos glorifying known terrorists, as well. Both are guilty of murdering tens of Israelis in well-known attacks.

One of the terrorists who participated in the March 1975 terrorist attack on the Savoy Hotel in Tel Aviv in which 11 Israelis were murdered.

Fatah Facebook page

Ra’ed Carmi, a Fatah archmurderer from the second intifada. The photograph, which marks the day of his death, takes pride in the fact that he was directly responsible for deaths of 165 Israelis and the wounding of over 1,800 others.

Fatah Facebook page

Fatah has often used its Facebook page as a vehicle for incitement, and activity on its social media accounts to this end have increased over the past several months….

Jews like Trotsky are made into good Jews when they get an axe or ice pick stuck in their head… A bad Jew then became a good Jew. Kapish???

(FROM SOMEBODY CALLED YAMIT82 ON THE ISRAPUNDIT WEBSITE COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO)

What has the above piece of fascist literature got to do with the debate over Israel and the Palestinian Arabs? Answer everything!

The debate is now in full swing. It takes one crucial form in the differences that Martin Sherman has with the new book by Caroline Glick

I and 4international are totally on the side of Martin Sherman and against Glick and the conclusions of the Glick book. These comclusions were very well described by Sherman thus:

But I have grave reservations – to understate the case – regarding what is, in fact, the center-piece of her book: Her proposal that Israel not only annex the entire area of Judea and Samaria, extend Israeli sovereignty over these territories and apply Israeli law to them, but incorporate the Arab population there as permanent residents of Israel, and offer them a path to citizenship.

It would require more than a gigantic leap of unsubstantiated hope to believe that such a measure could precipitate any result other than “Lebanonization” of Israel.

Implausible and imprudent

“Lebanonization,” as the noted New York Times columnist, the late William Safire, explained, refers to the [situation] within a single country so riven with religious and other disputes that [it] becomes impossible to govern”; and should be distinguished from “Balkanization,” which refers to splitting a country into several separate – usually rivalrous – countries.”

Were Glick’s prescription to be adopted, it is difficult to see how internecine inter-ethnic strife, which has become the hallmark of Israel’s northern neighbor, would not afflict Israel itself. Even if her demographic calculations are correct, it would induce almost intolerable pressures on the socioeconomic fabric of the country, were it to attempt to maintain itself as the nation-state of the Jewish people.

Glick does seem to be aware, at least partially, of the severity of the problems implementation of her policy prescription is likely to generate. She writes: “The main price Israel will pay for applying its laws to Judea and Samaria… will be the demographic burden of increasing its potentially hostile Arab minority by 1.66 million people.”

Elsewhere she acknowledges that there will be an “initial shock that [Israel’s] economy will likely absorb following the sudden, steep rise in the number of applications for its welfare rolls after it grants permanent residency to the Palestinians in Judea and Samaria.”

But apart from glib acknowledgment of their existence, I could find no indication of how Glick proposes that the grave societal strains she mentions (and the many that she doesn’t) will be resolved, other than an expression of optimism that they will be.

In other words Glick proceeds in her political praxis on a wing and a prayer. Sherman along with the great majority, I maintain, of Jews do not want to proceed like that.

I maintain this because the connections of Glick with the US Establishment Jewish groups give her the appearance of much and deep support. That is the Lie right there.

Sherman is right to call her.

Belman the editor of Israpundit has refused to back Sherman in this struggle. Which brings me back to that piece of Hitlerite Nazi crap at the top of this piece. That was published on Belman´s editorship of Israpundit and remains there.

This is not the kind of leadership Jews today need.

What type of leadership do Jews today need? Jews need today the leadership of a party based on the science of Marxism, which is Trotskyism.

This Trotskyist party in Israel will be based on a scientific understanding of history, meaning a treatment of history which is based on facts, and which will seek the truth about history.

In recent years writers like Andrew Bostom have made great strides in investigating what is the real nature of Islam. This has been hidden for many centuries but by going back to primary sources the truth has emerged. Islamic Spain was the most cruel of all places known to mankind. By going back to primary sources writers like Bostom, and there are now quite a few, have answered the blatant lies of people like the ex nun Karen Armstrong. This is a great asset for us Trotskyists.

Similarly we feel indebted to Martin Sherman for his challenge to Glick and to her book. Glick essentially is trying to gloss over the nature of the Palestinian Arab movement. In one sence this began with the Arab defeat of 1967. Then knowing they were defeated the Arabs turned towards creating the myth of the “Palestinians”, at first it took the form of a meme, now though it is more than a meme, it is hard ideology.

But the Palestinian Arab phenomenon as sold to the world is no more than Jihad in Alliance with Christian Antisemitism a la Vatican. It is also intermixed with the crisis of US Imperialism and with the non viability of the EU, with this crisis in capitalism producing growing trends towards war, especially towards war by NATO against Russia. So Jihad is central in many of the plans of the most reactionary fast becoming Fascist forces on earth: Islam, the EU, US Imperialism

What does Glick propose to do? Not take the fight against this ideology but lodge it ever more strongly inside the Israeli state, with up to 40 per Arab Jihadist against the unfortunate 60 per cent Jews, unfortunate because the Jews are alone, while there are billions of Muslims surrounding her.

It is the most ghastly thing that Glick has done in this book. Glick does not mean or set out to do so, but she weakens Israel as Iran helped by the US and the growing crisis between US and Russia prepares to strike Israel and Jews

Martin Sherman does not posit this issue of the Jews in the world economic capitalist crisis situation. Still he has taken a valiant step against Glick and I support him critically but unconditionally in doing this