As China demonstrates its political clout at the G20 summit in Seoul, the country continues to make headlines in economic and energy news as the China National Petroleum Company (CNPC) has made an agreement with Shell to develop Canadian oil sands.

CNPC, the parent of PetroChina, reported that its president, Jiang Jiemin and Royal Dutch Shell Plc (NYSE:RDS.B) CEO Peter Voser signed a memorandum of agreement in Beijing on “integrated co-operation” of oil and gas projects in Canada and coal bed methane development in China.

Earlier in the year both companies were involved in negotiating a $20 billion joint venture in Australia. Furthermore the Chinese are very well known to the Canadian petrochemical investment community over the years and PetroChina was chosen by Athabasca Oil Sands Corp (TSX:ATH) as its joint venture partner after the Canadian firm realized it would be difficult to finance its MacKay River and Dover oil sands projects in Alberta province via equity markets. PetroChina plans to spend at least $60 billion in the next decade on overseas acquisitions, Mr. Jiang said in March. The company plans to increase co-operation with foreign energy companies to accelerate its global expansion.

Shell Canada, which was taken private by Royal Dutch two years ago, is one of the country’s largest integrated oilsands producers and owns a controlling interest in the Athabasca Oil Sands Project which is currently expanding its Scotford upgrader to handle higher production.

China’s national oil companies (NOCs) wield a significant amount of influence in China’s oil sector. Between 1994 and 1998, the Chinese government reorganized most state-owned oil and gas assets into two vertically integrated firms: CNPC and Sinopec. These two conglomerates operate a range of local subsidiaries, and together dominate China’s upstream and downstream oil markets. CNPC remains the much larger and influential NOC and is the leading upstream player in China. CNPC, along with PetroChina, accounts for roughly 60 percent and 80 percent of China’s total oil and gas output, respectively, though the company’s current strategy is to integrate its sectors and capture more downstream market share. Sinopec, on the other hand, has traditionally focused on downstream activities such as refining and distribution with these sectors making up nearly 80 percent of the company’s revenues in recent years and is gradually seeking to acquire more upstream assets.

A Mirror Image

As a bookend to Chinese and Canadian domiciled interests negotiating resources, Husky Energy (TSX:HSE) is considering a spin out of its Chinese assets to develop a major natural gas find off China’s east coast. Chinese energy demand will jump 75 per cent by 2035, accounting for more than a third of global demand growth, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported on Tuesday. Oil is the second-largest source of energy for the country, accounting for 15 percent of the country’s total consumption.

The Chinese government’s energy policies are dominated by the country’s growing demand for oil and its reliance on oil imports. The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) is the primary policymaking and regulatory authority in the energy sector, while four other ministries oversee various components of the country’s oil policy. China is the world’s fastest-growing major economy and may source one-third of its unconventional gas supply from coal seams by 2030, Wood Mackenzie Consultants Ltd. said in a report in late August.

Oil Price Movement and Market Conditions

EIA expects the price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil to average about $83 per barrel this winter (October 1 to March 31), a $5.50-per-barrel increase over last winter and a $3.00 per barrel increase over last month’s forecast. Projected WTI prices rise gradually to $87.00 per barrel by the fourth quarter of 2011 as U.S. and global economic conditions improve. The latest report has revised world oil consumption growth in 2010 upward in response to stronger-than-expected growth in European oil demand during the second and third quarters of 2010, as well as continued strong growth in China. The non-OECD regions, especially China, the Middle East, and Brazil, represent most of the expected growth in world oil consumption in 2011 (World Liquid Fuels Consumption Chart). Among the OECD regions, EIA expects North America to show almost all the oil consumption growth in 2011, with a gain of nearly 0.4 million barrels per day. In 2011, EIA expects global oil consumption growth of 1.4 million barrels per day.

I find this line interesting: ” PetroChina was chosen by Athabasca Oil Sands Corp (TSE:ATH) as its joint venture partner after the Canadian firm realized it would be difficult to finance its MacKay River and Dover oil sands projects in Alberta province via equity markets.”

If this was true, why did they pay out a massive dividend just before their IPO. They don’t need money, they just need someone elses money.

http://oilinvestingnews.com/ Dave

Perhaps the question was best addressed by William (Bill) Gallacher, Chairman of AOSC, “Oil sands projects are very capital-intensive long-term investments and difficult to fully finance in the traditional equity market. AOSC therefore decided to look for joint venture partners, and these strategic joint venture arrangements with PetroChina, one of the world’s largest energy companies, can ensure that the MacKay River and Dover projects will be developed in timely manner, which is excellent news for Alberta and the rest of Canada.”

It is easy to just take executives words at face value. Lets look at the facts:

PetroChina paid 1.9 billion for 60% stake
AOSC paid out 1.3 billion in a special dividend just prior to their IPO
AOSC brings in 1.3 billion from their IPO

So there are 2 possibilities:

They could have not sold to PetroChina and not paid out a dividend OR
they could have not had an IPO and not paid out a dividend

The special dividend proves that they either didn’t need PetroChina’s money or IPO money

Beyond this look at their recent purchase of Excelsior. They are paying 0.36 CASH when months earlier Excelsior sold shares for 0.18 (interestingly priced as 0.36 for 2 shares + extras). Wouldn’t it make more sense for Excelsior to not dilute their shareholders at 0.18 or for AOSC to have paid a price closer to 0.18? They are neighbors. Its not like they have difficulties finding each other.

Unlock insight here

Comstock Mining (NYSEMKT:LODE) holds a massive 8,300 acre, contiguous land position in the epithermal, bonanza-grade mining district of Comstock. Its first two resource areas, Lucerne and Dayton, hold approximately 3.25 million gold equivalent ounces in all categories, measured, indicated and inferred.

The Resource Investing Newsletter:

Get our independent commentary on resource trends and companies delivered to your inbox.

The long-term outlook for Resource is positive and the worlds largest Resource producers are confident that the next few years will see a return to robust demand growth. The main growth markets for the metal are the BRIC countries, but demand from Western economies is expected to rise as well. The automotive and aerospace industries are seen as the main catalysts for new growth as manufacturers seek to reduce fuel consumption by creating lighter weight vehicles.

Resource Investing News is one of the leading providers of news and education on the Resource market. We pride ourselves on delivering quality, independent news to our investor audience. Our newsletters feature the latest Resource market commentary for investors interested in Resource stocks so you can stay up to date on the markets and leading companies.

Please sign up now to receive exclusive Resource articles delivered to your email account every week.

With your subscription, Resource Investing News will also send you a Stock Catalysts report at the beginning of the month that addresses sponsor company upcoming milestones which could positively impact a companys stock price.