Thanks for your quick reply!
When I talk about a catalog, it is like a portion of the repository that
was exported to some customer. I don’t know if we could have multiple
versions of the content, like v1.0, v2.0, etc. With Jackrabbit it is easy
to implement this concepts and build some services to export content and
build an application with our requirements?
Thanks
Pedro
On 11/20/11 2:23 AM, "Justin Edelson" <justin@justinedelson.com> wrote:
>Hi Pedro,
>
>2011/11/19 Pedro Vilaça <pedro.vilaca@alert-online.com>:
>> Thanks Justin.
>>
>> I will try to find some consulting services.
>
>It shouldn't be hard.
>
>>
>> However, I can try to explain our problems and doubts. As far as I know,
>> the jackrabbit is commonly used for application that hold a lot of
>> content/data (correct me if I’m wrong). We use the artifactory, and I
>>know
>> that it uses the jackrabbit.
>
>I think that's more or less correct, although I'm sure that if you
>asked 5 people what "a lot of content/data" was, you'd get 5 different
>answers )
>
>>
>> We are trying to build an application that will contain a lot of data,
>>but
>> also export some catalogs, have a rich interface to explore and insert
>>the
>> content, expose web services to other clients check if they have the
>>most
>> recent catalog and if not, download the new version.
>
>I'm not sure what you mean by a "catalog" and it sounds like you mean
>something very specific.
>
>In general, Jackrabbit is a good data store for richly hierarchical
>content which is semi-structured. If a "catalog" is some kind of
>collection of content in that the catalog can be said to contain the
>catalog, then I think Jackrabbit may be a good fit.
>
>Justin
>
>>
>> Do you think that jackrabbit is the best option to do that?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Pedro
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/20/11 1:52 AM, "Justin Edelson" <justin@justinedelson.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Pedro-
>>>If you are looking for consulting services around Jackrabbit, there
>>>are a number of companies who do that. I would suggest reaching out to
>>>them directly rather than through this mailing list.
>>>
>>>Justin
>>>
>>>On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Pedro Vilaça
>>><pedro.vilaca@alert-online.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Sam,
>>>>
>>>> Apologies for the delay.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It will be great if we could talk about the project with someone from
>>>> Jackrabbit team and have some consultancy. Through the mailing list is
>>>> difficult for two reasons:
>>>>
>>>> - The interactivity during the presentation of topics;
>>>> - The confidentiality of some important information;
>>>>
>>>> I do not know if that's possible, but if not, I can try to talk a
>>>>little
>>>> bit about the project through the mailing list.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Pedro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/14/11 9:06 PM, "sam ²" <skynare@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>What are your requirements?
>>>>>What are your innovated concepts that you're trying to implement?
>>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Pedro Vilaça <
>>>>>pedro.vilaca@alert-online.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are very interested in presenting our case in a more interactive
>>>>>>way
>>>>>> and through mailing list is not always easy to present objectively
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The platform that we are trying to build could be a great success
>>>>>>history
>>>>>> for Jackrabbit. We are talking about a huge project with some
>>>>>>innovation
>>>>>> concepts in a specific business.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm really interested in discuss interactively how Jackrabbit could
>>>>>>be
>>>>>>the
>>>>>> solution to achieve our content repository requirements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At the end, we are very interested in contribute to the Jackrabbit
>>>>>>project.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pedro
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>