Tag Archives: Domestic Abuse

For years now, President Obama, whatever his connections to the faith that calls for the deaths of infidels are, has hyped the reasonable nature of Islam.

For example, he’s called the Muslim call to prayer “the sweetest sound I know” and has expressed “our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world, including in my own country.”

He’s claimed, “Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance” and “has always been part of America.”

He quickly acknowledges “civilization’s debt to Islam.” That’s because “Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education.”

Obama repeatedly has stated he’s a Christian, after spending years listening to a radical race-based agenda in a Chicago church. Fox News talk show host Bill O’Reilly, commenting on a photograph of Obama in Muslim dress, said that reveals Obama’s “deep emotional ties” to Islam, the religion of his father and stepfather.

“There is no question the Obama administration’s greatest failure is allowing the Islamic terror group ISIS to run wild, murdering thousands of innocent people all over the world, including many Muslims,” O’Reilly said. “Mr. Obama has never, never acknowledged that mistake, nor does he define the ISIS threat accurately.

“That group is killing innocent people in order to impose a radical version of Islam on the world. The jihad is solely based on theology, perverted as it may be.”

But there’s been one issue on which Obama hasn’t really elaborated: Islam’s treatment of women. And a new report from the Gatestone Institute this week details why that position would be indefensible.

Islam allows a man to have intercourse with his slave woman, whether he has a wife or wives or he is not married…Whoever regards that as haraam is a sinner who is going against the consensus of the scholars.

Definitions

Rape

Duress

In jurisprudence, duress or coercion refers to a situation whereby a person performs an act as a result of violence, threat or other pressure against the person. Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed.) defines duress as “any unlawful threat or coercion used… to induce another to act [or not act] in a manner [they] otherwise would not [or would]”. Duress is pressure exerted upon a person to coerce that person to perform an act that he or she ordinarily would not perform. The notion of duress must be distinguished both from undue influence in the civil law and from necessity.Duress has two aspects. One is that it negates the person’s consent to an act, such as sexual activity or the entering into a contract; or, secondly, as a possible legal defense or justification to an otherwise unlawful act.[1] A defendant utilizing the duress defense admits to breaking the law, but claims that he/she is not liable because, even though the act broke the law, it was only performed because of extreme unlawful pressure.[2] In criminal law, a duress defense is similar to a plea of guilty, admitting partial culpability, so that if the defense is not accepted then the criminal act is admitted.

Duress or coercion can also be raised in an allegation of rape or sexual assault to negate a defense of consent on the part of the person making the allegation.

Freud famously said that what women want was the one question that he was never able to answer. The modern liberal, having abolished gender and the family, no longer worries about what women want. Instead he worries what the terrorists, who despite his best efforts to appease them, to respect their culture and religion keep blowing him up, want.

Recently it came out that the creative director of the September 11 Museum opposed including the famous photo that shows New York City firefighters raising the flag over the ruins of the World Trade Center. When reached for comment, the creative director said that he did not want to simplify 9/11.

“Its simplicity,” he said, “would actually distort the complexity of the event, the meaning of the event.”

Liberals are great lovers of nuance. Ask an ordinary New Yorker who saw the planes hit the towers what the…

Everything is blamed on the ‘evil foreigner’. Their own behavior, if not pleasing to Islam, is always pointed at some ‘foreign’ source. Here popular Egyptian ‘Expert’ on Islamic law Dr Malika Zarrar respond to callers on Egyptian TV al-Faraeen with sexual questions to ask whether they conform to Islamic law or not. France is blamed for a husband’s ‘perversions’.

Muslim Brotherhood mouthpiece Sheikh Yousef al-Qaradhawi has assured muslimas can “kiss” muslim penises as long as they don’t make him ejaculate from it. That is all in accordance to Islam, he has concluded (or according to his own personal preferences?).

Topics discussed are wife swapping, growing number of lesbian relations and anal sex amongst school girls to avoid the hymen to be damaged, hymen reconstruction approval on wedding anniversaries, and more. Towards the end Dr Malika praises the host for “raising topics that interest people” suggestion he should have the “Nobel…

[Apparently some people, Liberals most likely, think Muslims really are capable of showing tolerance and compassion and are really actively promoting world peace. I’m not one of those people and the title of this post is meant to be sarcastic. If you don’t like my sarcasm – too bad! If you don’t like that I post links to news articles, documents, and videos exposing the TRUTH about the evils of Islam then you clearly don’t care about the innocents who have been subjected to terror, torture and murder by Muslims. You’re free to stick your head back in the sand.]