Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> i'd be deathly scared of running a loadbalancer that automagically
> handled slow/fast requests the way you expect. the configuration would
> be a nightmare, and it would be doing so much logging and profiling of
> request timings, it might negate the purpose of a load balancer to begin
> with.
well, I dont't want to configure explicitly where requests go.
There are hardware balancers which do that (which cost a fortune) and
the upcoming lighttpd release seems to support something like that
(Shortest Queue First):
http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/11/14/mod-proxy-core-and-sqf
I'm not really sure if that's the solution for my problem and I realize
that advanced logging and profiling is not cheap. It just seems to me
that it's a common problem with rails (fast requests coming from
fragment caching etc, slow requests from complex pages with lots of db
queries) and was hoping others found a solution for it :)
- Florian