JAWAHARLAL NEHRUíS ANCESTORS

Date: 16 Jan 2010

Comment

JAWAHARLAL NEHRUíS ANCESTORS///////////////
Father of Moti Lal Nehru; The Story of Gangadhar///////////////
This is the true story of Ganga Dhar (not Ganga Dhar Nehru), father of
Moti Lal Nehru. The adjunct 'Nehru' derived from the Persian word
'Nahr' meaning a canal or nullah, was adopted by Moti Lal, who, like
all members of his family, had a fascination for alien Mohammedan
names mostly in Arabic or Persian. The adjunct 'Nehru' added a Persian
flavor to his otherwise Hindu name. That was very desirable for the
family, as will be explained later. Otherwise, under normal
circumstances, his name would have been Moti Lal Dhar.////////////////
The adjoining picture of Ganga Dhar was obtained from Robert Hardy
Andrews' book titled A LAMP FOR INDIA - The Story of Madame Pandit
(meaning Jawahar's first sister Vijay Lakshmi, alias Nan.) That book
was first published by Prentice-Hall in 1967, a long time after the
division of the country. But the fact on the scion of the dynasty,
namely Ganga Dhar, had been kept a secret from the Indian public,
primarily, the Hindus.////////////////
It is now quite clear, as you will soon see, that Ganga Dhar was an
assumed name. The man we now know as the paternal grandfather of
Jawahar Lal (son of Moti Lal) was in reality a sunni Mohammedan; in
fact he was a Mogul nobleman. The important question is why did he
then adopt a Hindu kafir's name? In this case a Kashmiri Brahmin's
name?////////////////
The reason has been explained in our previous article titled More on
the Nehru Dynasty on our web-site http://www.swordoftruth.com not too
long ago. The accompanying picture featured was the same one that
Jawahar Lal had referred to when he wrote in his autobigraphy that he
had seen a picture of his grandfather Ganga Dhar which protrayed him
as a Mogul nobleman. Krishna Hutheesing (Jawahar's second sister) had
also mentioned in her memoirs, that their grandfather Ganga Dhar was
the city Kotwal of Delhi (an important post) prior to 1857's uprising.
Bahadur Shah Zafar was still the sultan of Delhi. It was extremely
unlikely that he would hire a Hindu for that very important post.
/////////////////
Apparently, some investigations had been made on this count (please
see Mahdi Husain's Bahadur Shah II and the war of 1857 in Delhi - 1987
edition) but no one could discover Ganga Dhar's name as the Kotwal of
Delhi. Well, how could they? Ganga Dhar's real name then was
Ghiyasuddin Ghazi (or something like that) which had been quietly
changed to his new Hindu name, just before the English forces entered
the city. The sultan had replaced the earlier Kotwal as well as the
City Governor Mirza Maniruddin. The latter had been dismissed by
Bahadur Shah Zafar on charges of spying for the English. The Naib
Kotwal, a subordinate officer, was a Hindu; his name was Bhao Singh.
And another Hindu, one Sri Kashinath was the thanedar of the Lahori
Gate area of Delhi. Their names were found in the records but Ganga
Dhar was missing. Be that as it may, the fact remains that Ganga Dhar
indeed was the grandfather of Jawahar and Krishna Hutheesingh.
////////////////
And how did he look like? Ganga Dhar had a thick beard which would put
even Pakistani president Tarar's beard to shame! Ganga Dhar's thick
moustache extended beyond his ears. He used to wear a Mogul cap and
had in his both hands a long sword. Does that look like a Kashmiri
Brahmin? No, not at all!///////////////////
The Muslim Grandfather of Jawaharlal Nehru
///////////////////
Ghiyasuddin Ghazi (the word means 'kafir-killer') looked exactly like
a sunni Mogul. Don't they say: 'If it looks like a duck, walks like a
duck and quacks like a duck, well, then it IS a duck.' The same was
the case with Ganga Dhar, the Kashmiri Brahmin alias Ghiyasuddin Ghazi
the sunni Mogul. Only this vital information had been kept a secret
from the Hindus of India, like so many other secrets of the family!
///////////////////
Our readers! If you can, please read up all references made in the
memoirs of Jawahar Lal and Krishna Hutheesingh on Ganga Dhar. True to
the last whisker, the picture portrayed on our web-site, does
represent a Mogul nobleman, so proudly mentioned by both the brother
and the sister. The element of secrecy crept in when it became clear
that the Nehrus' Mogul ancestry, if made known to India's Hindu
public, might spell trouble for the forthcoming 'reign'. The 'Hindu by
accident' got wise to the fact and acted as if he was indeed, son of a
Kshmiri Brahmin, Moti Lal Nehru by name.
/////////////////
Now, why was it at all necessary for Ghiyasuddin Ghazi to change his
name to Ganga Dhar? Dhar is a well-known Kashmiri Hindu surname. Many
of these 'Dhars' were forced converted into Islam; their names were
then changed to 'Dar' just to distance themselves from the Hindu
'Dhar'. The smart Moti Lal added the Persian epithet 'Nehru' thus
making the name sound even more 'un-Hindu'.
////////////////
The English army, quite unlike the Hindu army, was made of a different
material. While Hindus let the defeated enemy go free (like Prithviraj
Chauhan had done and then regretted), the English were after each and
every Mogul. They were shooting down all Mohammedans for fear of
facing another claimant to the Delhi throne. Panic and fear ran like
wildfire among the Moguls. There was nowhere to flee. The city had
been surrounded by the 'firangi' forces and their allies, the Sikhs
and the Gurkhas. It was then that the wily Mohammedans came up with
the brilliant idea of name-changing. Ghiyasuddin became Ganga Dhar,
almost like Yusuf Khan who had become Dilip Kumar, many years later.
///////////////
Delhi was ransacked. All residents (both Hindus and Mohammedans) had
to leave and take shelter under tents set up by the 'firangis' outside
city ramparts. For full two months they remained there in the tents
(like the Kashmiri Hindu refugees do today). During this time, the
English searched thoroughly each vacated home and discovered immense
wealth, which was, by the rules of the game, confiscated by the new
rulers. A month later, the Hindus were asked to return to their homes.
The Mohammedans were allowed to return even later.
////////////////
In the aftermath, many Mohammedans fled to nearby cities not yet fully
under the control of the English. Agra was such a city. It still had
considerable Mogul influence. And Jawahar's Mogul grandfather Ganga
Dhar, with his entire family, left for Agra. How do we know that?
Jawahar states in his own autobiography that on their way to Agra, the
English troops detained Ganga Dhar's family. Ganga Dhar told them that
they were not Mohammedans but Kashmiri Hindus. Jawahar explains in his
autobigraphy that the primary reason for the detention was their Mogul
features. The Kashmiri Hindus looked very much like Mohammedans from
Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan and so on. And behold the English let Ganga
Dhar and his family go to Agra. The rest is history.
///////////////
[Afterword: The unbecoming fascination of the Nehrus for alien
Mohammedan connections persisted even beyond the Mogul roots. Please
read up K.N. Rao's 'The Nehru Dynasty', Chapter XXIII. Reference is
made there to Indira's (falsely described as the wife of Parsi Firoz
Gandhi when he was no such thing; he was a pure and simple sunni
Mohammedan whose father Nawab Khan was a liquor supplier of Allahabad)
letters in the publication Two Alone, Two Together (letters between
Indira Gandhi and Jawahar Lal Nehru) edited by Sonia Gandhi. The
publishers of this book were London's Hoddard and Stoughton. In that
book is featured a letter by Indira to her father, Jawahar and it
says:
///////////////
"Some months ago when I was at Metheran, Masi (aunt) wrote saying that
she had heard from some Parsis that it was written in their ancient
book that a Hindu of high family would marry into a Parsi family
(here, a 'Hindu of high family' is Indira and 'Parsi' is Firoz, son of
sunni Nawab Khan) and their son would do great things - religious
reform and so on. Masi asked me to inquire into the matter but it
quite slipped my mind. Last evening my mother in law (meaning Nawab
Khan's so called Parsi wife, converted to islam at the time of her
nikaah) came in a state of great excitement. She had also heard
something of the sort, a slightly different version. According to her,
the son was the reincarnation of the Shah Behram of Persia.
///////////////
"Baby's (meaning Rajiv Gandhi's) patri (horoscope) has arrived. I am
enclosing it. It is written in Gujarati but I suppose you will be able
to get it read. I am enclosing an English translation of the
jyotishi's remarks. I am sending all this registered - please do the
same when you return it. The good thing about it is supposed to be
that there are five planets in one house," and so on.
/////////////////
Quite clearly, the Nehrus could oscillate from the Mogul to the
Persian at will as long as the roots appeared to be Mohammedan, alien
or home made, and farther removed from indigenous roots the better.
May we ask what great things did Rajiv do, other than stealing the
Bofors money and jeopardizing the lives of our jawans by supplying
them with inferior canon? And what reform was she talking about other
than legalizing polygamy among the Mohammedans of India and granting
them special privileges to talaaq their womenfolk, sans alimony? No
doubt Indira would not move against the fornication-prone Pakistani
ruffians when they were shooting down unarmed Bengali Hindu civilians.
Some three millions were thus decimated but she had not even lifted a
finger until the uproar inside the country became literally
uncontrollable. Then again, she let go the 93,000 Pakistani soldiers
scot free without exacting a quid pro quo from the enemy. Neither did
she ask for the trial of Tikka Khan. And during that time, our jawans
captured by the Paki army on the western front, were summarily shot in
prisons, against the Geneva regulations. Is it surprising that in
Europe today one can purchase picture post cards of Hari Mandir Temple
with a comment on the back that Indira had secretly become Mohammedan
and that is why she had chosen the Gurpurnima day (when the temple was
choc a bloc with women and children) to shoot the pilgrims down, in
thousands. And when the 93,000 Pakis left for their home, they had put
on weight, were well-dressed and so on. She was some musalmanani of
great piety although out of fear for divulging her Islamic roots, she
had refused to visit the Kaaba as desired by the Saudi Royal family.
Since when the Saudis have taken to inviting non-Mohammedans to visit
Mecca?/////////////////
Let us not be impressed by the 'five planets' and all such 'bakwaas'.
What really happened is in front of our eyes, is this. In a country
where they would not even hurt a chicken, there were not one, not two
but three assassinations in quick succession. And all three were
Gandhis. One was shot by a Hindu, the second was turned into pulp by
two Sikhs and the third was pulverized by a Catholic lady of Tamil
extraction. In the mean time, the bastard son of Mohammad Yunus (still
the custodian of the Netaji Papers), Sanjay aka Sanjiv, killed himself
in that plane accident. And the 'sarkari chacha' had died of syphilis,
which apparently he had contracted in a local dhaba from a glass of
drinking water! Well! Who will believe that? What really happened can
only be described as divine dispensation to preserve and protect our
'dharma rajya' of Bharat, that the Congress and the secularists along
with the Mohammedan traitors were bent upon destroying for good!//////////////
============================
FOOTNOTE:
ASK A LEARNED INDIAN, "WHAT WAS THE NAME OF INDIRA GANDHI'S HUSBAND?"///////////
PROMPT COMES THE ANSWER FROM THE TIMID "COOLIE", "FEROZE GANDHI."///////////
"OH GANDHI? ALL RIGHT. NOW TELL ME THE NAMES OF HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND AT LEAST ONE UNCLE AND ONE AUNT AND TWO FIRST COUSINS."/////////////
SILENCE. SILENCE. IGNORANCE.///////////
WHY? BECAUSE THEY WERE ALL MOHAMMEDANS OF ALLAHABAD.////////////
TRY AND FIND FEROZE KHAN'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE! OR THE DOCUMENT AT HIS NIKAH!/////////
THIS IS PERISHING HINDUSTHAN or "PARTITIONED INDIAN SECULAR STATE" (P.I.S.S.)./////////////
000000000