3+4. When it comes to low-light  it's the flash that matters  in both tests of indoor shooting (low light from 3, 6, 9, and 15 feet and NO-light condition from 3,6, and 9 feet) the K800 Xenon flash showed its magic! Although there was some noise, even the images taken in room with no lighting were bright and the objects were recognizable  the photos were on focus, as it has a red focus-assist light. The N73's LED was a step behind, and the noise-reduction system killed most of the detail. 3rd is the D900 and at the bottom again are the N80 and N93.

D900

K800

N73

N80

N93

SD200

5. Night-photos . If you want good photos, you should use a tripod! Unfortunately, there are no real tripods for cell phones yet, as the phones don't have the standard slot for tripod (all digital cameras, even the most basic one have it), so we captured the photos while holding the devices in our hands. You can easily see that the D900 and K800 produced the best, most real and most beautiful images of the night scenes we got; although the K800 auto-focus turned off in this mode, its images were fine and looked better than those of the three Nokia phones. Although the D900 and K800 got the same result, we believe that if you use something to put your phone on to be steady during the exposure, the D900 will be an idea better than the K800, but unfortunately in our case we got blurred images, due to the hand shake.

Share:

17 Comments

Display mode:

1.Nik (unregistered)

I don't agree with the outdoor and macro conclusions. The reason is D900 and K800. On a closer look on this photos, the white balance of D900 is far whorst than K800 and the natural colours of the K800 are more acurate, like Canon camera.
So, in my opinion, I think that the K800 has a little advanced in front of D900.

2.Nulan (unregistered)

I agree with the first comment. Either you guys are getting paid by Samsung or you've absolutely no experience of photography. The D900 photos were low contrast and the lens is soft. Also how you can give the D900 first place in the macro test after the mess it made of the toy photo is beyond me.

6.mojo (unregistered)

7.sarim (unregistered)

I don't have any of these phones nor am I a fan of any of these companies as I think that all have something different. I think that the camera of sony ericsson k800i was the best over all (sometimes even better than the cannon camera). Since I wanna buy a phone with a good camera, I am thinking about the sony ericsson k800i which is an overall king. :)

11.K (unregistered)

12.John (unregistered)

you know, after seeing how the conclusion is clearly a lie. the SD200 outdid the D900 and the K800 in every phot and is not even included in the cocnlusion, and they still lied, i dont trust em anymore, how do i even know that the photos were taken by what they claim to be taken by, what a waste of my time of closely examining the photos.

13.Not John (unregistered)

14.Jon2 (unregistered)

I have used N93, and the quality is nowhere near bad! Even in dark areas, it can take excellent quallity photos. And the video quality is absolutely exceptional! Only Nokia N95 and 6233 have the same video quality! I think the N93 you guys bought is defective. I suggest you retry this comparison test to clear the confusion you guys have made to those who want to buy a N93!!

15.xtorm (unregistered)

great effort by this guy, thx alot!!
i agree k800i takes the nearest real life pic. but in times k800 tends to darken the picture abit, d900 is soft, yea i agree, but details wise d900 do have abit of advantage.
d900 is no where good indoor, and lots of ppl say it need steady hands compare to others.

All content (phone reviews, news, specs, info), design and layouts are Copyright 2001-2015 phoneArena.com. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part or in any form or medium without written permission is prohibited! Privacy . Terms of use . Cookies . Team