(Stillness in the Storm Editor) Remote viewing is a method of gaining information about a target, using a viewers mind and intention. It is a type of psi ability, which is regarded by the mainstream as unreliable. But if you examine the information provided by adept remote viewers, it becomes clear that it is most definitely a valid form of information gathering. What’s more, the CIA spent considerable funds and energy researching this technique via the Star Gate Project—which some claim “went black” after it was declassified in 1995. In the following video, a team of remote viewers investigates Corey Goode and the Blue Avian extraterrestrials, particularly one named Raw-Teir-Eir.

As some of you likely know, I’ve been following Goode’s work since he went public in late 2014. His material is controversial, to say the least.

Goode claims that a highly advanced extraterrestrial species has been interacting with the earth, in one way or another, for thousands of years—which is obviously highly controversial. Now include time travel and age regression technology, secret space programs, ancient breakaway civilizations, spiritual rapture events and extraterrestrial messages, and it’s almost impossible for some people to believe. But this seeming unbelievability is itself a type of logical fallacy.

From an analysis and discernment point of view, it is wrong to conclude a piece of information is untrue simply because it seems unbelievable. This is called the personal incredulity fallacy. I would argue it’s one of the most common logical fallacies, which I think is an understandable response, given the way we’re taught to evaluate information in today’s world.

The fact is, educational institutions do not properly teach critical thinking and discernment. Most people don’t learn about philosophy and the branch of it that deals with discernment, known as epistemology. As a result, logical fallacies prevent people from evaluating information properly, resorting to emotional bias (rejection due to feelings), personal incredulity fallacies, and straw man arguments.

The latter fallacy, a straw man argument, is when a person either gets a partial impression or completely misunderstands a claim, and they respond to their misinterpretation as if that is what is stated. All of these fallacies, and many more, result in rejection or acceptance of a claim in an incorrect way, which leads to the formation of false or inaccurate knowledge. And since knowledge is the personal map that we use to navigate the world, false knowledge can be crippling for people trying to make sense of emergent or new things, like seemingly unbelievable claims.

What makes a statement, claim, or argument valid is that it accurately represents reality.

If I tell you the sky is clear and you investigate the claim by looking at the sky, you can determine that the claim is true because the sky is actually clear.

What’s challenging is when we can’t investigate a claim through empirical study. But in these cases, we can’t reject a claim as untrue simply because it’s hard to investigate, to do so would be to invoke another logical fallacy.

For example, if you tell me you dreamed about a flying car last night, it’s not possible for me to investigate via observation of your dream. But that doesn’t mean your lying or that your claim isn’t true.

Instances where claims can’t be evaluated requires us to place the claim in the unverifiable category—that it could or couldn’t be true, we just aren’t certain.

Now what’s intersting is that we don’t necessarily need to know if something is true or not to benefit from thinking about it.

Consider works of fiction as an example.

A moral to a fictional story has value, even if the narrative that was used to transmit it isn’t factually true. Thus, even if we can’t investigate a claim to see if it is true we can still contemplate it, which results in the formation of new ideas that might be valuable. Of course, all of this requires proper discernment founded on exercising the logical mind.

The fact that a lot of people don’t believe claims because of popular opinion (incredulity due to presumed common sense) or reject it because it makes you feel bad (rejection due to negative emotion) doesn’t have any material bearing on a claims validity.

In short, your feelings about a claim have nothing, whatsoever, to do with whether or not it is true. That being said, our instincts can point us in the right direction.

Similarly, popular opinion about a claim might be valid or completely wrong but only critical thinking and proper discernment actually prove or disprove if something is true.

Consider the Wright Brothers insofar as public opinion, who are credited with inventing aeronautic technology, the wing shape; they invented the airplane. At the time, engineers thought it was too incredible, too unbelievable—nonsense—that the shape of a wing could impart lift in a strong enough fashion to raise a heavy object off the ground. But the Wright Brothers were proven correct. And now everyone on earth recognizes that planes and aeronautics are real. Clearly, popular opinion, blind belief in expert opinion, was wrong in this case.

But what does remote viewing say about the plausibility of a claim? What does it say about Corey Goode and the claims he presents?

Due to the fact that remote viewers see things in their mind and then transmit them to the world as a claim, a kind of witnessing at a distance, some say they can’t be trusted. After all, human beings can make mistakes, they can lie, they have biases, and this seemingly makes remote viewing data untenable. But this response to the potential of corruption of remote viewers is also fallacious. Just because a person can misrepresent a viewed object doesn’t mean they will, nor does it mean the entire agency of remote viewing is completely dismissible.

If a remote viewer describes something, and that thing they describe can be observed, then there is enough data to evaluate if the information witnessed by the viewer is valid. Similar to a physical witnessing event, we can assess the veracity of what is presented as eye-witness testimony. Insofar as proof, remote viewing doesn’t prove that Goode’s claims are valid, but it does provide more data for contemplation.

As was mentioned earlier, it’s in the contemplation that real benefits of discernment can be acquired. Discernment can tell us if something is true, untrue, or unverifiable, but it doesn’t tell us much about what something means. That requires philosophy and exploring meanings, something everyone has the built in capacity for.

What I found intriguing about the video is that the presenter offers an excellent overview of what remote viewing is, their personal experience of investigating Goode’s claims, and an unbiased testimony related to Teir-Eir. I say unbiased because the team of viewers in question had no idea who Goode was, what he speaks about, or who Teir-Eir is, yet they still provided a report that was congruent with Goode’s material. This in and of itself suggests remote viewing is a valid form of investigation.

I also found it interesting that the viewers described a being, Teir-Eir, who is a kind of guardian for the earth. Even though some might find Teir-Eir’s take on human beings as somewhat negative or offensive, it’s a valid perspective. The viewers asserted that Teir-Eir considers itself as superior to the life on the earth, and they are using Goode for some purpose that he finds somewhat uncomfortable. This description is similar to what a parent does in relation to raising a child.

Arguably, a parent needs to prepare their child for the world, and properly recognize the value of sharing information that would give their child wisdom. Sometimes, this wisdom is hard to process, because life is challenging. In other words, a parent knows that their knowledge an competence is superior to their child, hence they share wisdom.

I think contemplating the information presented by the remote viewers is a worthy exercise. It can teach us critical thinking along with highlighting our personal reactions. You can better understand how you discern information so you can improve this invaluable skill.

Ultimately, Goode’s claims remain unverified, yet the message coming through them has merit and, I would argue, value insofar as improving life on earth.

Identified as an intuitive empath (IE), Corey Goode was recruited through one of the MILAB programs at the young age of six. (MILAB is a term coined for the military abduction of a person that indoctrinates and trains them for any number of military black ops programs.) Goode trained and served in the MILAB program from 1976-1986/87. Toward the end of his time at MILAB he was assigned to fill an IE support role for a rotating Earth Delegate Seat (shared by secret earth government groups) in a “human-type” ET SuperFederation Council.

Goode continues his IE work now and remains in direct physical contact with the Blue Avians (of the Sphere Being Alliance) who have chosen him as a delegate to interface with multiple ET Federations and Councils on their behalf, liaison with the SSPAlliance Council, and deliver important messages to humanity.

Hear Corey Goode’s Wife’s Testimony:

Join Teresa Yanaros in this Divine Frequency exclusive interview of Stacy Goode, wife of secret space program insider Corey Goode. Stacy describes how her and Corey met, and takes us through her journey of learning the truth about her husband’s involvement in the secret space program. This is Stacy’s first ever exclusive interview! The deep insights she provides are inspiring, and her perspective and positivity shines through as a beacon of light to women all around the world.

What is the best method of contacting the Sphere beings or Blue Avians to offer your service? Any special meditation? How can we form groups of likeminded people to work together?

Corey Goode’s Response:

This is the most important part of what the Blue Avians wanted me to pass along.

The best thing to do is to not look to outside sources or people as saviors. People keep misrepresenting what I am saying about the Sphere Alliance and saying that they are just more “Higher Dimensional Saviors” from a “Savior Model” when I have been extremely clear they are not. Their message was presented for a reason. It is a simple yet not easy path to follow (That is the backbone of many faiths). We can change the world one person at a time, that one person being ourselves. That is not the answer most people want to hear. Most people want a savior in the form of ET’s or ED’s to fly down from the clouds and wipe out all negativity from our reality when this was a learning environment designed for us to evolve in and to karmically grow and resolve our own issues. We have had the power from the beginning to resolve these issues. We have the true power of Co-Creative Consciousness that the Elite has used against us as the basis of their Black Magic. If we reclaim that power we could reclaim our freedom and change our reality to a positive one very quickly. This is being learned by more and more people who are being awakened every day. At some point we will hit critical mass and along with the vibrational changes our Sol System is going through and the Consciousness Awakening we will solve these problems ourselves. I am adding the “Blue Avian Message” once again below that also warns against hero/guru worship. We are the problem and we are the solution to the world’s problems. We just need to make the painful inward changes and the rest will be taken care of by a fully awakened and conscious humanity.

Brett Stuart has spent over 10 years investigating various forms of meditative practices and perceptual techniques. Previously only available to close friends and contacts, he is now offering private consultations to the public. With a team of viewers, we are able to shift our minds into a highly attentive and observant state known as thought-catching. This altered state of consciousness acts as a gateway for accessing deep intuition not only for ourselves, but also for others. Information obtained from a TI session can be applied to any area in life – from health to wealth and relationships.

Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.

Reader Interactions

Comments

Thank you for posting this. I subscribe to Brett’s youtube channel but managed to miss it. One line in Brett’s video prompted me to comment, being, “The Blue Avians are claiming to be one and the same as the ancient god RA.”

This line snagged me and reactivated an old concern I have re: David Wilcock, Corey Goode, and this kind of shoe-horning the Blue Avians into this role as the beings who were/are RA. Maybe they are, maybe not. I can’t argue that they are NOT, but just want to put my observation out here:

Early on Corey said that Tier Eir initially introduced himself as Raw Tier Eir (phonetic spelling). Corey really had no experience with the RA material back then, but David latched on to this idea and continued over many many Cosmic Disclosure episodes (to this day, really) to repeat his hunch (or hope) that this Blue Avian being is of the RA collective and that much of Corey’s narrative fits the Law of One narrative.

I watched over the months as David kept pressing that point, and watching Corey more or less shrug with uncertainty about this connection, because he simply didn’t know if it was true. Then one day David essentially coerced Corey on air to agree that the Avians and RA are one and the same… and from then on the Law of One and the Blue Avian saga were woven into one unfolding narrative.

I’m open. David could be right. It could be true. Don’t know. I just know how I felt about David’s leading Corey in this direction of his ‘grok’ all along the way – I felt uncomfortable with all that ‘applied persuasion’ re: this Avians/RA are one and the same notion.

So my point is that the Blue Avians were NOT claiming to be RA, and just wanted to make this distinction. Really it was David who continually pursued this idea in many shows with Corey.

I want to be clear here, too, that I’m not down on either David or Corey. I respect them both in a big way for doing what they do, and find Corey’s experiences riveting and believable. I’ve been through enough high strangeness myself to NOT knock another experiencer’s testimony. I’m grateful that Cosmic Disclosure is around; same goes for Gaia.com (as well as so many alternative media content providers!).

One more thing about Corey Goode. I heard him share his experience of attending an off-planet conference before his real name was known to the public. This was in an online forum. His story blew me away (as in, WAY away!) because I had had the EXACT experience he was describing a few months prior to hearing him talk about it. I actually contacted him at the time to ask him if the date of MY experience corroborated with HIS. He said no, but these conferences are happening more frequently now and more & more people are being taken to them.

This got long! But really I could go on for days about stuff like this. So very intriguing. Thanks again and keep it coming! Bless.

Do you think Dr. Frankenstein had a contingency plan to destroy his experiments if they didn’t turn out the way he expected? Of course he did. Do you think the “Company of Heaven” has a similar plan when they created this universal Ascension game? Of course they did.

You’re experiencing that contingency plan right now. But what kind of beings create a game that forces them to constantly destroy constituent parts of themselves in order to justify and salvage their own game? It’s the Ascension game itself that has become the real monster. The Ascension game has become an abomination. And the “Company of Heaven” refuse to admit that is what they continue to serve and perpetuate.

Darkness and evil do serve a purpose in these lower densities. They help create a learning curve for us here. But if you remove that darkness you will also remove that learning curve and stagnation sets in and will cause a universe of “yes” men to be created. There will be nothing to force you to think differently anymore for yourselves. Do you now understand the abomination the “Company of Heaven” created? And they call it Ascension.

Propaganda for Corey Goode ?, is a fake and the blue aviars are destroyers of worlds of dark origin, are hybrids created in the laboratory, soulless and work with AI, are members of the failed and condemned kingdom of Lucifer / Satan, are our enemies and they envy us because we are the natural creation of the One True Creator God of everything. The avian beings (there are statues in almost all ancient myths) are advanced technologically (andromeda) because they live thousands of years as bio-androids, but they are nothing else, they don’t evolve or anything, they disguise themselves as benevolent, but they are evil, genocidal and slave owners and are less evil than reptiles, but they are from the same reptilian group.