Translate

Sunday, February 7, 2016

U.S. READIES FOR WAR AGAINST RUSSIA, WILL QUADRUPLE ARMS AND TROOPS

WHEN YOU'RE ONE OF THE RICHEST NATIONS ON EARTH, YOU CAN HIRE OTHERS TO DO YOUR 'DIRTY WORK' FOR YOU, SO, APPARENTLY, THE HOUSE OF SAUD HAS DONE JUST THAT.

THIS STORY HAS MORE TWISTS AND TURNS THAN AN AMERICAN SOAP OPERA.

THE THING CAN BE UNRAVELED, BUT IT TAKES AWHILE, SO PLEASE BEAR WITH ME.

[AS FOR BACK TO THE "ALL-CAPS", BEFORE ANYONE WHINES ABOUT IT, BROKE MY NEW GLASSES FIRST DAY OUT, LONG STORY...REPLACEMENT NEXT WEEK.]

ON FEB. 6, IT WAS REPORTED IN SEVERAL MIDDLE EAST NEWS SOURCES THAT THE SAUDI-LED "COALITION" OF 33 SUBSERVIENT NATIONS (MAKING 34 NATIONS INVOLVED) WILL NOW SEND MERCENARIES, OR "COALITION TROOPS" INTO SYRIA TO MORE OR LESS RESCUE THOSE "SYRIAN REBELS", WHICH THE U.S. LOVES AND HAS HELPED, EVEN IF SOME OF THEM WEAR THAT ISLAMIC STATE ARMBAND.

CNN WAS ONE OF A FEW WHO PICKED UP ON THE REACTION FROM THE IRANIAN POINT OF VIEW.

They also said that Morocco, Turkey, Bahrain, the
UAE and Qatar will also deploy their forces to Syria through the Turkish
borders, and Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei will dispatch mercenaries
to Saudi Arabia too.

On Thursday, the Saudi Defense Ministry said it
stood ready to deploy ground troops to Syria to allegedly aid the US-led
anti-ISIL, also known as Daesh, coalition.

Both Tehran and Moscow have issued stern warnings
to Riyadh, stressing that the Saudi intruders, who in fact intend to
rescue the terrorists that are sustaining heavy defeats these days, will
be crushed in Syria.

Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps
(IRGC) Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari said Saudi Arabia doesn’t have
the guts to send its armed forces to Syria.

“They claim they will send troops (to Syria) but I
don’t think they will dare do so. They have a classic army and history
tells us such armies stand no chance in fighting irregular resistance
forces,” Jafari told reporters in Tehran on Saturday.

“This will be like a coup de grâce for them.
Apparently, they see no other way but this, and if this is the case,
then their fate is sealed,” he added.

Jafari, said this is just cheap talks, but Iran welcomes the Saudi decision if they decide to walk on this path."

“That
kind of new is very welcome. I look forward to discussing (it)
with…Saudi defense minister (Mohammad bin Salman) next week – that and
other kinds of contributions that Saudi Arabia can make.”

JUST PRIOR TO THIS DEVELOPMENT FRIDAY, IT SURELY DID APPEAR THAT AMERICA DECLARED OVERT WAR ON RUSSIA...MAYBE YOU MISSED THAT? NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg announced on
February 2nd that he approves of US ‘Defense’ Secretary Ash Carter’s
proposalto quadruple US armaments and troops in Europe, against
‘Russian aggression’.Secretary Carter said earlier that same day, in his announcement of America’s arming for war against Russia:

We are reinforcing our posture in Europe to support
our NATO allies in the face of Russia’s aggression. In Pentagon
parlance, this is called the European Reassurance Initiative and after
requesting about $800 million for last year, this year we’re more than
quadrupling it for a total of $3.4 billion in 2017.

That will fund a lot of things: more rotational US forces in
Europe, more training and exercising with our allies, more preposition
and war-fighting gear and infrastructure improvements to support all
this.

And when combined with US forces already in and assigned to
Europe – which are also substantial – all of this together by the end of
2017 will let us rapidly form a highly capable combined arms ground
force that can respond across that theater, if necessary.

Russia and China are our most stressing competitors.

They have developed and are continuing to advance military
system[s]

that seek to threaten our advantages in specific areas.

And in
some case[s], they are developing weapons and ways of wars that

seek to
achieve their objectives rapidly, before they hope, we can respond.

Because of this and because of their actions to date, from
Ukraine to the South China Sea, DOD has elevated their importance in our
defense planning and budgeting.

Since he is a Secretary of ‘Defense’ instead of a Secretary of Offense, he immediately added:

While we do not desire conflict of any kind with either of these nations – and let me be clear.....

That’s all there was to the assertion there; he didn’t finish the
sentence, nor even the thought. But in this offhand way, he did at
least try to give the impression that the US is never an aggressor – for
example: that, though the US is expanding NATO right up to Russia’s
borders, Russia is being the ‘aggressor’ to move troops and weapons up
to those borders – up to Russia’s own borders The US is preparing for a face-off, an armed confrontation with Russia.BUT THE PLAN TO OVERTHROW THE SYRIAN GOVERNMENT, THE VERY PLAN OBAMA IS USING, WAS WRITTEN IN 1957, BY KERMIT "KIM" ROOSEVELT, THE GRANDSON OF TEDDY ROOSEVELT.

JUST A HISTORICAL FACT, FOLKS.Kermit Roosevelt, Teddy Roosevelt’s grandson, planned and headed the CIA coup to overthrow Iran’s progressive secular democratic anti-communist President Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953, and to replace him with the puppet, Shah Reza Pahlevi, so as to continue Western oil companies’ control over Iran’s oil and gas.

Back in 1957, there was no Assad dynasty in Syria, but only the Ba’ath Party,
which was, and is, the only effective non-sectarian, or non-theocratic,
political force in Arabic countries; so America’s oil companies used the Islamic forces in order to grab Middle Eastern oil, and to
be able to use Syria as the vital pipeline route for it into Europe (the
world’s largest energy-market).

The Ba’athists refused to cooperate
with any such plan for foreign control over their national resources.

This was the basis for America’s determination to overthrow the
Ba’athists, and replace them with their enemies, the Islamists.

(This
was likewise one reason for America’s wars against the Ba’athist Saddam
Hussein.)

Kim’s plan, just like his earlier and successful plan
to take over Iran, enjoyed the full backing of both of the Dulles
brothers — Allen Dulles who ran Eisenhower’s CIA, and John Foster Dulles
who ran Eisenhower’s State Department.

Whereas U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower
was ultimately forced to cancel Kim’s plan because only Turkey was
willing to participate in it, Obama was able to get the royals of Saudi
Arabia and Qatar to perform as Kim had planned for them to.

BUT IT HAS TAKEN 59 YEARS OF CAREFUL MANIPULATION AND PLANNING, OF ROMANCING EACH NATION IN TURN, IN PLAYING ONE ISLAMIC SECT AGAINST ANOTHER UNTIL WE HAVE A "SCORE, SCORE! THE U.S. FINALLY SCORES!"

[THE TEA ROOM HAS TO WONDER IF AMERICA'S "COALITION" PARTNERS REALIZE HOW CLOSE SOME OF THEM HAVE COME TO BEING JUST LIKE SYRIA, MARKED FOR WAR. IN 1927, AMERICA WAS PLANNING TO INVADE AND CONQUER CANADA AFTER ALL, IN A MOVE AGAINST GREAT BRITAIN. THAT WAS CALLED "WAR PLAN RED". SEVERAL "COLOR-CODED" WAR PLANS WERE DRAWN UP DIRECTLY AFTER WW1, FOR IRELAND, MEXICO, INDIA, PORTUGAL, SPAIN, MUCH OF LATIN AMERICA, ETC. SEE "WAR PLAN RAINBOW" AT GLOBAL SECURITY'S WEBSITE.]Are the die cast?

IF RUSSIA TAKES THE BAIT, YES.IF PUTIN DECIDES ASSAD IS WORTH THE GAMBLE OF A LONG NUCLEAR WINTER...IF HE DECIDES TO ALSO RETHINK THE UKRAINE...

How has it come to this, the world on the brink of World War 3 just because the "Super Powers" are moving from a cold war back to a dangerous "King of the Hill" stance that will mean a very HOT war?

WHAT IS SO IMPORTANT ABOUT THAT MIDDLE EAST SANDLOT THAT MAKES ANOTHER WORLD WAR SEEM A LOGICAL RISK TO NUCLEAR-CAPABLE NATIONS?

WHY ARE SMALLER, LESS INFLUENTIAL NATIONS ALIGNING WITH THE TWO BIG PLAYERS, RUSSIA AND THE U.S.?AS THE OPPOSING FACTIONS INSIDE SYRIA ENDED THEIR "PEACE TALKS" SUDDENLY, WAS IT BECAUSE BOTH SIDES REALIZED THE FINAL PUSH IS COMING?

SAUDI ARABIA AND TURKEY ARE NOW POISED TO LAUNCH THOUSANDS OF GROUND TROOPS INTO SYRIA. IT'S A VERY SMELLY SITUATION. MANY HAVE COMPLAINED OF "SMELLING A RAT", AND THEY WERE CORRECT.

IT'S A WAR THAT HAS BEEN PLANNED FOR BY THE U.S. FOR ALMOST 60 YEARS.THE ISLAMIC STATE AND SYRIA ARE JUST THE TWO MOST RECENT PAWNS IN THE GAME.

OIL,
GOLD, DIAMONDS, EVER MORE PRECIOUS WATER RESOURCES, LAND ON WHICH TO
GROW FOOD, RAISE FOOD ANIMALS, ALL THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF EVERY NATION
ARE DAILY COVETED AND BARTERED FOR, STOLEN AND BOUGHT, ALWAYS SOUGHT
AFTER BY THOSE WITH INSATIABLE GREED, THE ONES WHO WOULD NOT BE
SATISFIED IF THEY HAD IT ALL.

ISN'T THIS WHY WARS ARE FOUGHT?

"HE WHO CONTROLS THE WEALTH CONTROLS EVERYTHING."

THEY
CONTROL THE PRICES PLACED ON ALL THINGS, EVEN ON HUMAN LIVES, DECIDE WHO GETS WHAT AND WHEN, WHO TO
"SANCTION", WHOSE NEEDS TO IGNORE, AND, DARE WE IMAGINE, WHICH NATION
IS NEXT UP FOR THE GRAB OF ITS NATURAL RESOURCES.

THAT SAUDI ARABIA IS SENDING IN A BUNCH OF MERCENARIES IS NOT SURPRISING AS IT IS A NATION "MARKED"BY THE ISLAMIC STATE FOR EXTERMINATION, BUT IT JUST SEEMS UTTERLY INSANE THAT THE HOUSE OF SAUD WILL BE ALIGNED WITH THE "I.S." WHO IS DETERMINED TO KILL THEM ALL.

"ISIS", OR IS,OR ISIL, OR DAESH, DEPENDING ON WHO'S REPORTING, IS AN AVOWED ULTRA-PURIST WAHHABI MUSLIM GROUP, THE SAME WAHHABI SECT AS THE HOUSE OF SAUD ALSO PURPORTED TO BE UNTIL IT BECAME INCONVENIENT FOR THEM TO ADMIT THAT.

THE LEADER OF THE ISLAMIC STATE,AS WE HAVE SHOWN BEFORE, HAS VOWED TO KILL EVERY MEMBER OF THE SAUDI MONARCHY AS HERETICS AND INFIDELS BECAUSE THEY ALLOW WORSHIP OF THE "BLACK STONE", THE "Hajarul Aswad", THE CORNERSTONE OF THE KAABA, WHICH ISIS SWEARS TO OBLITERATE, AND BECAUSE THE SAUDI MONARCHS ALLOW OTHER MUSLIM SECTS TO MAKE PILGRIMAGE TO MECCA, WHICH ISIS HAS ALSO SWORN TO ALLAH TO DESTROY. BUT, EVEN GIVEN ALL THAT ANIMOSITY AND THAT SWORN JUSTICE THAT ISIS SAYS IT WILL METE OUT TO THE HOUSE OF SAUD AND TO ALL WHO HAVE WORSHIPED THE BLACK STONE, OR MADE PILGRIMAGE TO MECCA, SAUDI ARABIA WILL STILL BACK ISIS NOW, AND ANY AND ALL WHO ARE AGAINST ASSAD IN SYRIA, ALL WHO DESPISE IRAN, ALL WHO COZY UP TO RUSSIA.

AND WHILE SAUDI ARABIA PAYS TO TRAIN THEIR MERCENARY ARMY TO LAUNCH AGAINST ASSAD, THEY ARE STILL BOMBING THE SUPREME HELL OUT OF YEMEN AND KILLING INNOCENT CHILDREN, WOMEN AND OTHER CIVILIANS THERE EVERY DAY.

[BTW, WHILE THE REPREHENSIBLE U.N. CLAIMS TO BE AN ORGANIZATION DEDICATED TO THE EQUALITY OF ALL NATIONS, ANYONE CAN LOOK AND SEE WHICH NATIONS LITERALLY GET AWAY WITH MURDER, GENOCIDE, ETHNIC CLEANSING, ILLEGAL INVASIONS, AND WHICH ONES AREN'T EVEN ALLOWED TO DEFEND THEMSELVES WITHOUT THE BLOODY U.N. SCREAMING 'FOUL'.]

IF ANY NATION APPEARS TO BE, IN ANY WAY, AFFILIATED WITH IRAN, THE HOUSE OF SAUD WILL FINANCE THE ENDEAVOR TO DESTROY THEM AND TO ATTACK IRAN BY ANY MEANS AVAILABLE, EVEN IF IT MEANS HELPING ISIS, WHO WILL DEFINITELY CARRY OUT ITS PLANNED ANNIHILATION OF THE HOUSE OF SAUD AND ALL "IDOL- WORSHIPERS" AT FIRST OPPORTUNITY.

JUST LIKE WHEN SAUDI ARABIA SILENTLY AND STEALTHILY FUNDED USAMA (OSAMA) BIN LADEN, THE SAUDI MONARCHY HAS DONE AS THE USA HAS AND PLAYED ALL ENDS AGAINST THE MIDDLE...THE MIDDLE BEING SYRIA AND IRAN.

WHILE WASHINGTON HAS SACRIFICED KERRY TO BUTT-KISSING THE IRANIAN LEADERS, IT ALSO SENT HIM TIME AFTER TIME TO ROMANCE SAUDI ARABIA.

IT'S A DISGUSTING DISPLAY OF HYPOCRISY AND DOUBLE-CROSS ON OUR PART, BUT "ALL IS FAIR IN LOVE AND WAR", RIGHT?

OBVIOUSLY, EITHER IRAN AND THE SAUDIS ARE BLISSFULLY UNAWARE THAT THEY ARE BEING PLAYED LIKE VIOLINS BY AMERICA AND ITS "COALITION", OR ELSE IT IS THEIR TENDENCY TO DO THE SAME THAT MAKES THEM JUST ACCEPT IT AND KEEP DOING WHAT THEY DO BEST...CALL THE SHOTS FOR OTHERS IN AN AGE-OLD PROXY WAR, USE THEIR 'ALLIES' TO FIGHT FOR THEM .

HAVING CONTROL OF THOSE 33 OTHER NATIONS, ALONG WITH ALL THE OIL FIELDS, OBVIOUSLY DOES MAKE THE SAUDI MONARCH "KING OF THE WORLD".

OR SO AMERICA AND ITS OTHER COALITION NATIONS HAVE ALLOWED HOUSE OF SAUD TO BELIEVE... LET'S JUST SAY IT... "IT JUST AIN'T SO!"BACK TO 2006, WHEN THINGS REALLY, REALLY BEGAN TO ESCALATE.The Map of the “New Middle East” A relatively unknown map of the Middle East, NATO-garrisoned
Afghanistan and Pakistan, has been circulating around strategic,
governmental, NATO, policy and military circles since mid-2006. It has
been causally allowed to surface in public, maybe in an attempt to build
consensus and to slowly prepare the general public for possible, maybe
even cataclysmic, changes in the Middle East. This is a map of a redrawn
and restructured Middle East identified as the “New Middle East.”The term “New Middle East” was introduced to the world in June 2006
in Tel Aviv by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (who was
credited by the Western media for coining the term) in replacement of
the older and more imposing term, the “Greater Middle East.”
This shift in foreign policy phraseology coincided withthe inauguration of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Oil Terminal in the Eastern Mediterranean.

AS THE MAP'S LEGEND SHOWS, SAUDI ARABIA, IRAN, TURKEY, QATAR, KUWAIT, PAKISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, THE U.A.E., AND ISRAEL ALL LOSE TERRITORY IN AMERICA'S REDRAWN MIDDLE EAST.Although the map does not "officially" reflect Pentagon doctrine, it
has been used in a training program at NATO’s Defense College for senior
military officers.This map, as well as other similar maps, has most
probably been used at the National War Academy as well as in military
planning circles.This “New Middle East” seems to be based on several other
maps, including older maps of potential boundaries in the Middle East
extending back to the era of U.S. President Woodrow Wilson and World War
I. The map is showcased and presented as the brainchild of retired
Lieutenant-Colonel (U.S. Army) Ralph Peters, who believes the redesigned
borders contained in the map will fundamentally solve the problems of
the contemporary Middle East.The map was a key element in the retired Lieutenant-Colonel’s book, Never Quit the Fight, which was released to the public onJuly 10, 2006 and was also published, under the title of Blood Borders: How a better Middle East would look, in the U.S. military’s Armed Forces Journal with commentary from Ralph Peters.It should be noted that Lieutenant-Colonel Peters was last posted to
the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, within the
U.S. Defence Department, and has been one of the Pentagon’s foremost
authors with numerous essays on strategy for military journals and U.S.
foreign policy.ACCORDING TO PETERS:"The concept of a redrawn Middle East has been presented as a
“humanitarian” and “righteous” arrangement that would benefit the
people(s) of the Middle East and its peripheral regions. International borders are never completely just. But the
degree of injustice they inflict upon those whom frontiers force
together or separate makes an enormous difference — often the difference
between freedom and oppression, tolerance and atrocity, the rule of law
and terrorism, or even peace and war.The most arbitrary and distorted borders in the world are in Africa
and the Middle East. Drawn by self-interested Europeans (who have had
sufficient trouble defining their own frontiers), Africa’s borders
continue to provoke the deaths of millions of local inhabitants. But the
unjust borders in the Middle East — to borrow from Churchill — generate
more trouble than can be consumed locally." HOWEVER, THOSE DESIGNATED AS LOSING TERRITORY MAY NOT AGREE TO DO SO.THAT PRESENTS A WEE PROBLEM.

WHAT TO DO?

USE IN-FIGHTING AMONG MUSLIM SECTS TO U.S. ADVANTAGE, FAN THOSE FLAMES, DIVIDE AND CONQUER.

Many of the problems affecting the contemporary Middle East are the
result of the deliberate aggravation of pre-existing regional tensions.

Sectarian division, ethnic tension and internal violence have been
traditionally EXPLOITED by the United States and Britain in various
parts of the globe including Africa, Latin America, the Balkans, and the
Middle East. Iraq is just one of many examples of the Anglo-American
strategy of “divide and conquer.” Other examples are Rwanda, Yugoslavia,
the Caucasus, and Afghanistan.Western-style “Democracy” has been a requirement ONLY for those
Middle Eastern states which do not conform to Washington’s political
demands.

Invariably, it constitutes a pretext for confrontation. Saudi
Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan are examples of UNDEMOCRATIC states that the
United States has no problems with because they are firmly aligned
within the Anglo-American orbit or sphere.

Additionally, the United States has deliberately blocked or displaced
genuine democratic movements in the Middle East... from Iran in 1953
(where a U.S./U.K. sponsored coup was staged against the democratic
government of Prime Minister Mossadegh) to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey,
the Arab Sheikdoms, and Jordan where the Anglo-American alliance
supports military control, absolutists, and dictators in one form or
another, AND HAS HELPED THOSE NATIONS PUT DOWN REBELLION AND ATTEMPTS AT OVERTHROWING THEIR MONARCHIES.IF WE JUST LOOK BACK ON THE SYRIA ALIGNMENT, WE SEE THAT AMERICA REALLY DIDN'T MAKE SOLID MOVES THERE UNTIL HOUSE OF SAUD SET UP ITS WAIL THAT BAD OLD ISLAMIC STATE WANTED TO BEHEAD ALL THE SAUDI MONARCHS AND BLOW MECCA INTO POWDER.

THE SAUDI WHINE GOT AMERICA HOPPING TO CRANK UP VERY SUPERFICIAL EFFORTS AGAINST ISIS/ISIL, ALL THE WHILE MAKING LITTLE "BLUNDERS" THAT ARMED THE ISLAMIC STATE BETTER AND BETTER."OOPS! HOW DID ISIS GET THOSE AMERICAN WEAPONS AND VEHICLES? WE DROPPED THOSE FOR THE OTHER GUYS!" RIGHT, OKAY, SURE.WELL, THE FIRST TO BALK WAS TURKEY, PERHAPS.According to Turkish press releases on September 15, 2006, the map of the
“New Middle East” was displayed in NATO’s Military College in Rome,
Italy. It was additionally reported thatTurkish officers were immediately outraged by the presentation of a portioned and segmented TurkeyThe Turkish Chief of Staff, General Buyukanit, contacted the U.S.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Peter Pace, and protested
the event and the exhibition of the redrawn map of the Middle East,
Afghanistan, and Pakistan.TOUGH...NOT TURKEY'S CALL (PUN INTENDED).

ANOTHER TURN OF EVENTS, GOING WAY BACK.... TO 1997.

The following are important excerpts and passages from former U.S. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski’s book, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geo-strategic Imperatives.

Brzezinski
(ZB) also states that both Turkey and Iran, the two most powerful states of
the “Eurasian Balkans,” located on its southern tier, are “potentially
vulnerable to internal ethnic conflicts [balkanization],” and that, “If
either or both of them were to be destabilized, the internal problems
of the region would become unmanageable.

If either or both of them were to be destabilized, the internal
problems of the region would become unmanageable, while efforts to
restrain regional domination by Russia could even become futile. ”It seems that a divided and balkanized Iraq would be the best means
of accomplishing this. Taking what we know from the White House’s own
admissions; there is a belief that “creative destruction and chaos” in
the Middle East are beneficial assets to reshaping the Middle East,
creating the “New Middle East,” and furthering the Anglo-American
road map in the Middle East and Central Asia:

[PLEASE READ CAREFULLY WHAT "ZB" HAD TO SAY. IT'S VERY ENLIGHTENING.]ZB: "Ever since the continents started interacting politically,
some five hundred years ago, Eurasia
has been the center of world power." (- p. xiii).

"In Europe, the Word “Balkans” conjures up images of
ethnic conflicts and great-power regional rivalries. Eurasia, too, has
its “Balkans,” but the Eurasian Balkans are much larger, more populated,
even more religiously and ethnically heterogeneous.

They are
located within that large geographic oblong that demarcates the central
zone of global instability (…) that embraces portions of southeastern
Europe, Central Asia and parts of South Asia [Pakistan, Kashmir, Western
India], the Persian Gulf area, and the Middle East.The traditional Balkans represented a potential geopolitical prize in the struggle for European supremacy.The
Eurasian Balkans, astride the inevitably emerging transportation
network meant to link more directly Eurasia’s richest and most
industrious western and eastern extremities, are also geopolitically
significant.

Moreover, they are of importance from the standpoint of security
and historical ambitions to at least three of their most immediate and
more powerful neighbors, namely, Russia, Turkey, and Iran, with China
also signaling an increasing political interest in the region.

But
the Eurasian Balkans are infinitely more important as a potential
economic prize: an enormous concentration of natural gas and oil
reserves is located in the region, in addition to important minerals,
including gold.The world’s energy consumption is bound to vastly increase
over the next two or three decades.

Estimates by the U.S. Department of
Energy anticipate that world demand will rise by more than 50 percent
between 1993 and 2015, with the most significant increase in consumption
occurring in the Far East.

The momentum of Asia’s
economic development is already generating massive pressures for the
exploration and exploitation of new sources of energy, and the Central
Asian region and the Caspian Sea basin are known to contain reserves of
natural gas and oil that dwarf those of Kuwait, the Gulf of Mexico, or
the North Sea.Access to that resource and sharing in its potential wealth
represent objectives that stir national ambitions, motivate corporate
interests, rekindle historical claims, revive imperial aspirations, and
fuel international rivalries.

The situation is made all the
more volatile by the fact that the region is not only a power vacuum but
is also internally unstable."GOOD SUMMARY BY ZB, RIGHT? Brzezinski offers the alternative to a world in chaos UNLESS the U.S.
controls the ENTIRE planet by whatever means are necessary and are
likely to succeed.

"BY WHATEVER MEANS"... HE LAID IT ALL RIGHT OUT THERE....14 YEARS BEFORE 9/11, BUT AFTER DADDY BUSH MADE HIS MOVE AGAINST IRAQ.

LITTLE GEORGIE BUSH, JR., WAS A "MOP-UP PUPPET", AS IS OBAMA.

"The key to controlling Eurasia,"
says Brzezinski, is controlling the Central
Asian Republics.
And the key to controlling the Central Asian republics is
Uzbekistan."

Thus, it comes as no surprise that Uzbekistan
was forcefully mentioned by President George W. Bush in
his address to a joint session of Congress, just days after
the attacks of September 11, as the very first place that
the U.S.
military would be deployed.

YES, UZBEKISTAN....NOT PAKISTAN, NOT SAUDI ARABIA, BOTH COMPLICIT IN HIDING AND HELPING THAT ROGUE USAMA BIN LADEN WHO WAS TAGGED AS THE [ALREADY DEAD] MASTERMIND OF THE ATTACK ON AMERICA, BUT WE SENT TROOPS INTO ALMOST UNHEARD OF UZBEKISTAN.

WHY SEND AMERICAN TROOPS TO UZBEKISTAN?WHAT DID THEY DO TO DESERVE THAT?

READ AGAIN WHAT ZB WROTE...UZBEKISTAN IS THE KEY TO THE ENTIRE REGION...BUT HOW?

ZB: "How America
'manages' Eurasia is critical. Eurasia
is the globe's largest continent and is geopolitically axial.

A power that dominates Eurasia would
control two of the world's three most advanced and economically
productive regions.

A mere glance at the map also suggests
that control over Eurasia would almost
automatically entail Africa's subordination,
rendering the Western Hemisphere
and Oceania geopolitically peripheral
to the world's central continent.

About 75 per cent of the
world's people live in Eurasia, and
most of the world's physical wealth is there as well, both
in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia
accounts for 60 per cent of the world's GNP and about three-fourths
of the world's known energy resources." (p.31)

"...To put it in a terminology that harkens
back to the more brutal age of ancient empires, the three
grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent
collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals,
to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the
barbarians from coming together." (p.40)

THOSE ARE AMERICA'S 3 GOALS, GLEANED FROM HISTORY, FROM ANCIENT CONQUERORS, WHOM OUR REAL PUPPET-MASTERS IDENTIFY WITH, WHOM THEY CLAIM BLOOD RELATIONS TO, WHOM THEY SEEK TO BEST BY FINALLY BRINGING ALL THE WORLD TO ITS KNEES BEFORE THEM. CLEVERLY, THEY CREATED THE U.N. TO ACCOMPLISH THIS, "IN THE NAME OF GLOBAL PEACE".Dr. Johannes
B. Koeppl, Ph.D., a former German defense ministry official
and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner, said in an interview on November 6, 2001, "The interests behind the Bush
Administration, such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), The Trilateral Commission (TC)
- founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller- have prepared for and are now moving
to implement open world dictatorship within the next five
years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are
fighting against citizens." That was sort of on the right track but way off home plate.

Koeppl didn't look far enough back in history, and he set too much stock in how good the CFR and TC would be at orchestrating anything, given the U.N.'s trump card claim as the only possible "Ruler of the World".

When our village idiots agreed to join ranks with the U.N., the old "League of Nations", little did they know they were selling themselves down the river, or that the U.N. had "dibs" on the Middle East, and the rest of the globe.

IT'S SIMPLY "CONQUEST FOR FUN AND PROFIT" , THANKS TO "THINKERS" LIKE PNAC (PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY) AND AMERICA HAS BECOME A BIG PLAYER.

THE ORIGINAL PLAN TO DIVIDE AND CONQUER THE MIDDLE EAST MAY HAVE BEGUN BEFORE EITHER OBAMA OR GWB WERE BORN, DURING WORLD WAR ONE.

BACK IN TIME AGAIN...TO THE TRAP WE FELL INTO

"There's a quote often attributed to Allen Dullesafter it was noted that the final 1964 report of
the Warren Commission on the assassination of JFK contained
dramatic inconsistencies. Those inconsistencies, in effect,
disproved the Commission's own final conclusion that Lee
Harvey Oswald acted alone on November 22, 1963.

Dulles, a career
spy, Wall Street lawyer, the CIA director whom JFK had fired
after the 1961 Bay of Pigs fiasco
- and the Warren Commission member who took charge of the
investigation and final report - is reported to have said,
"The American people don't read."

THERE'S THAT OLD FOUNDING FATHERS' ELITIST MINDSET SHOWING UP AGAIN..."AVERAGE AMERICAN'S ARE TOO DUMB TO TRUST WITH A REAL VOTE. LOOK, THEY CAN'T EVEN READ! LET'S JUST SET SOME OF OUR OWN GUYS OVER THEM, KEEP THEM PACIFIED AND RUN THINGS FROM BEHIND THE CURTAIN."

LESS THAN 50 YEARS AFTER WASHINGTON ENDED HIS PRESIDENCY AND WENT HOME TO HIS PLANTATION, JUST A SHORT TIME AFTER AMERICA GAINED HER INDEPENDENCE [WHICH IS A MYTH] , IN 1832,THAT GREAT INDIAN-KILLER, THAT WORLD-CLASS THIEF WHO MANAGED TO STEAL THE LAST OF THE INDIAN LANDS EAST OF THE MISSISSIPPI AND SEND THE EASTERN TRIBES PACKING WEST OF THAT RIVER TO, WHAT HE ONCE HOPED ALOUD, WAS THEIR DEATH, OLD ANDY JACKSON SWORE TO ERADICATE THE BANKING CARTEL WHICH HE SAW 184 YEARS AGO AS THE "SHADOW GOVERNMENT", THOSE WHO INCESSANTLY PUSHED FOR WARS AND INTERNAL CONFLICT, THOSE RICH ENOUGH TO CALL THE SHOTS WITH BRIBES IN THE RIGHT HANDS.

WHAT JACKSON SAW AND HATED WAS THE BEGINNINGS OF WHAT WE NOW KNOW AS THE FEDERAL RESERVE. CENTRAL BANK OF AMERICA.

FEW AMERICAN ARE AWARE THAT THE FED IS OUR THIRD CENTRAL BANK...YES, OUT THIRD!

FROM THE PDF WRITTEN BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE ITSELF, "Historical Beginnings ... The Federal Reserve": "The Federal Reserve System is the third central banking system in United States history. The First Bank of the United States (1791–1811) and the Second Bank of the United States (1817–1836) each had a 20-year charter.

Both banks issued currency, made commercial loans, accepted deposits,
purchased securities, maintained multiple branches and acted as fiscal
agents for the U.S. Treasury.

The U.S. Federal Government was required to purchase 20% of the bank capital stock
shares and to appoint 20% of the board members (directors) of each of
those first two banks "of the United States."

WHAT DID THAT MEAN?Each bank's
majority control was placed squarely in the hands of wealthy investors
who purchased the remaining 80% of the stock. ABE LINCOLN WAS A MAN WITH MANY FAULTS, BUT HE ALSO SAW THAT THE CENTRAL BANK CREATED UNPAYABLE DEBT.

"When the Confederacy seceded from the United States, the bankers once
again saw the opportunity for a rich harvest of debt, and offered to
fund Lincoln's efforts to bring the south back into the union, but at
30% interest. Lincoln remarked that he would not free the black man by
enslaving the white man to the bankers and using his authority as
President, issued a new government currency, the greenback.

This was a direct threat to the wealth and power of the central bankers, who quickly responded.

"If this mischievous financial policy,
which has its origin in North America, shall become endurated down to a
fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost.
It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money
necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without
precedent in the history of the world. The brains, and wealth of all
countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it
will destroy every monarchy on the globe." -- The London Times
responding to Lincoln's Greenback notes WELL, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS, THE LONDON BANKERS GATHERED THEIR ARMY OF PROPAGANDISTS, PUSHERS, MINIONS AND MANIPULATED THEIR WAY BACK INTO AMERICA. LINCOLN WAS ASSASSINATED AND THE GREENBACK DIED.AS ALWAYS, CONGRESS HAD ALREADY RUSHED TO HELPED THE BANKERS REGAIN POWER BEFORE LINCOLN COULD SET US FREE FROM ETERNAL DEBT.

In 1863, as a means to help finance the Civil War, a system of national banks was instituted by the National Currency Act.
The banks each had the power to issue standardized national bank notes
based on United States bonds held by the bank. The Act was totally
revised in 1864 and later named as the National-Bank Act, or National Banking Act,
as it is popularly known. The administration of the new national
banking system was vested in the newly created Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency and its chief administrator, the Comptroller of the Currency. The Office, which still exists today.

THE FEDERAL RESERVE, CREATED BY SECRET MEETING BY A GROUP OF CONTROL-SEEKING ELITISTS, A FINANCIAL COUP THAT RENDERED AMERICA AN ETERNAL DEBTOR NATION, IS ABOUT TO FUND YET ANOTHER WAR, AND WILL FUND ALL SIDES, AS ALWAYS.

ACROSS THE GLOBE, THE BANKING CARTEL IS DANCING FOR JOY.

A WHOLE NEW GENERATION OF SLAVES IS THEIRS!

Frank A. Vanderlip,
president of the National City Bank of New York, CLOSE associate of the
Rockefellers let slip the truth, but few have read his words even today, 81 years after he proudly wrote them in his autobiography, "From Farmboy to Financier":"Despite my views about the value to society of greater publicity for the
affairs of corporations, there was an occasion, near the close of 1910,
when I was as secretive, indeed, as furtive as any conspirator. None of
us who participated felt that we were conspirators; on the contrary we
felt we were engaged in a patriotic work. We were trying to plan a
mechanism that would correct the weaknesses of our banking system as
revealed under the strains and pressures of the panic of 1907.

I do not
feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyl
Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually
became the Federal Reserve System.

… Discovery, we knew, simply must not
happen, or else all our time and effort would be wasted.

If it were to
be exposed publicly that our particular group had gotten together and
written a banking bill, that bill would have no chance whatever of
passage by Congress. Yet, who was there in Congress who might have
drafted a sound piece of legislation dealing with the purely banking
problem with which we were concerned?"They hid the truth from congress and from the american people, but he felt "patriotic"? They conned Congress, but were "patriots"?

BULLS**T! THEY WERE SLAVE-MAKERS!THEY CREATED A MASTER FOR A NATION OF SLAVES!

They created a private institution that would for 81 years thumb its nose at Congressional inquiry, that would, for all time, keep its boot firmly on the necks of all American citizens and work and plan with other "Central Banks"to create recessions, depressions, devalue currency, inflate economies, manipulate markets, and make sure each nation was indebted in a way none could ever, ever pay down.

FROM 1791 TO 2016...225 LONG YEARS OF BEING OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY A HANDFUL OF POWERFUL MEN WHO HOLD THE PURSE STRINGS OF THE WORLD'S WEALTH... FROM THE BIRTH OF AMERICA UNTIL TODAY, THE SAME OLD "MASTERS"...MEN PUSHING INCESSANTLY FOR WAR, FOR CONFLICT, KEEPING NATIONS PITTED AGAINST OTHER NATIONS, KEEPING THE WHEELS OF INDUSTRY OILED WITH BLOOD.

YOU WERE WRONG, ALLEN DULLES, YOU ROTTEN, TRAITOROUS CRIMINAL, SOME AMERICANS DO READ!

AND, TODAY, THANKS TO THE INTERNET AND THAT ALMOST WORTHLESS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, WE CAN READ A HELLUVA LOT MORE THAN WE WERE EVER EXPECTED OR INTENDED TO READ.WE CAN READ AND WILL READIN YOUR OWN WORDS, THE WORDS OF THOSE WHO WROTE OR SPOKE THEM, THE WORDS THEY IMAGINED THEY HAD HIDDEN WELL ENOUGH SO AS NOT TO CAUSE A PROBLEM WHILE THEY RETRAINED AMERICANS TO NEVER QUESTION THEIR LEADERS, THE ELITE, THE "BOSSES", THOSE "BETTER THAN POOR, DUMB AVERAGE JOE AND JANE". WE CAN READ THIS:

"The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing.The
process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was
ever invented. Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin.

The Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the
power to create deposits, and with the flick of a pen they will create
enough deposits to buy it back again.

However, take it away from them,
and all the fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to
disappear, for this world would be a happier and better world to live
in.

But if you wish to remain slaves of the Bankers and pay for the cost
of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." -- Sir
Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England in the 1920s, the second
richest man in Britain

AND WE CAN READ THIS, SOMETHING ELSE FEW REALIZE:

The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King
George III's Currency act, which forced the colonists to conduct their
business only using printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England
at interest.
Benjamin Franklin, acting as the colonies' representative to Britain, argued against this move in 1763.

"You see, a legitimate government can both spend and lend
money into circulation, while banks can only lend significant amounts of
their promissory bank notes, for they can neither give away nor spend
but a tiny fraction of the money the people need. Thus, when your
bankers here in England place money in circulation, there is always a
debt principal to be returned and usury to be paid.

The result is that
you have always too little credit in circulation to give the workers
full employment.

You do not have too many workers, you have too little
money in circulation, and that [money] which circulates all bears the
endless burden of unpayable debt and usury...

...In the Colonies, we issue
our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip [interest-free, wealth-based
money issued by The Colonies 1750-1764 before Bank of England crooks
made it illegal].

We issue it in proper proportion to make the products
pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner,
creating ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power,
and we have no interest to pay to no one."

The following year, King George III passed the Currency act which
outlawed all forms of money in the colonies, forcing them to conduct all
commerce
using bank notes borrowed at interest from the Bank of England.

WHAT HAPPENED NEXT?WAR!Following the revolution, the US Government actually took steps to keep the bankers out of the new government!

"Any
person holding any office or any stock in any institution in the nature
of a bank for issuing or discounting bills or notes payable to bearer
or order, cannot be a member of the House whilst he holds such office or
stock." -- Third Congress of the United States Senate, 23rd of
December, 1793, signed by the President, George Washington

Just one year after Mayer Amschel Rothschild had uttered his infamous "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws", the bankers succeeded in setting up a new Private Central Bank called the First Bank of the United States, largely through the efforts of the Rothschild's chief US supporter, Alexander Hamilton.

Founded in 1791, by the end of its twenty year charter the First Bank of
the United States had almost ruined the nation's economy, while
enriching the bankers. Congress refused to renew the charter and
signaled their intention to go back to a state issued value based
currency on which the people paid no interest at all to any banker.

WE CAN READ:

"Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the
international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System
have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and
manipulates the credit of the United States" — Sen. Barry Goldwater (Rep. AR)

"This [Federal Reserve
Act] establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President
[Wilson} signs this bill, the invisible government of the monetary power
will be legalized....the worst legislative crime of the ages is
perpetrated by this banking and currency bill."

"From now on, depressions will be scientifically created."

— Congressman Charles A.Lindbergh Sr. , 1913

"We have, in this
country, one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known.
I refer to the Federal Reserve Board. This evil institution has
impoverished the people of the United States and has practically
bankrupted our government. It has done this through the corrupt
practices of the moneyed vultures who control it". — Congressman Louis T. McFadden in 1932 (Rep. Pa)

"I have never seen more
Senators express discontent with their jobs....I think the major cause is
that, deep down in our hearts, we have been accomplices in doing something
terrible and unforgivable to our wonderful country. Deep down in our heart, we know
that we have given our children a legacy of bankruptcy. We have defrauded
our country to get ourselves elected." — John Danforth (R-Mo)

"These 12 corporations
together cover the whole country and monopolize and use for private
gain every dollar of the public currency..." — Mr. Crozier of
Cincinnati, before Senate Banking and Currency Committee - 1913

"The [Federal Reserve Act]
as it stands seems to me to open the way to a vast inflation of the currency... I do not like to think that any law can be passed that will
make it possible to submerge the gold standard in a flood of irredeemable
paper currency." — Henry
Cabot Lodge Sr., 1913

AND WE CAN READ THE "BOTTOM LINE"...

"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none." -- Gutle Schnaper,
wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and mother of his five sons

AS LONG AS THE GREEDY LIVE, WE WILL HAVE WARS.

AS LONG AS THE WEALTHY CONTROL EVERYTHING, THEY WILL DECIDE WHICH NATION IS NEXT ON THE LIST TO DESTROY.

AS SYRIA, RUSSIA, IRAN SEE THIS AS A FIGHT FOR THEIR LIVES, EXPECT "ALL HELL TO BREAK LOOSE"...IN THE NEAR FUTURE.

THERE IS NO LONGER ANYTHING THE REST OF US CAN DO TO STOP IT. OUR CHANCE TO DO SO ENDED ABOUT 60 YEARS AGO WHEN WE REFUSED TO LISTEN TO ALL WARNINGS THAT WE, THE PEOPLE, WERE NO LONGER IN CHARGE.

___________________________

POSTSCRIPT AND FURTHER READING:

KNOWLEDGE GIVES POWER, CHANGES FEAR OF THE UNKNOWN AND THE ENSUING PANIC OFTEN CAUSED BY THAT INTO CALM RESOLVE.

IN THE YEARS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING WORLD WAR TWO, AMERICANS WERE "COCK-SURE" OF THEMSELVES, HAD DEFEATED THE ENEMY, WERE ON TOP OF THE WORLD. WE SAW A NATIONAL ECONOMIC BOOM FOR A TIME, THE AMERICAN DREAM WAS REALIZED BY MANY A 'JOHNNY' WHO CAME MARCHING HOME, HURRAH, HURRAH!

AND THEN, WE STARTED TO BECOME COMPLACENT, AND WHY NOT?WHAT COULD GO WRONG? OUR FEARLESS LEADERS HAD LED US TO VICTORY!SURELY THEY'D LEAD US ON TO EVEN BETTER DAYS, RIGHT?

THOSE WHOSE "god" IS GREED, IS POWER ABSOLUTE, SAW THE OPPORTUNITY IN ALL THAT AND GRABBED THE REINS OF THE NATION AND BEGAN TO STEER US INTO THE GREAT VOID OF APATHETIC, UNQUESTIONING COMPLIANCE.

SINCE THEY HAD "SAVED" US, WE OWED THEM SOME RESPECT, WE OWED THEM A REWARD OF AT LEAST LOYALTY, WE OWED THEM, PERIOD.

AND THE DEBT GREW, AND WE SAW WE'D NEVER PAY THE DEBT BUT THE "MASTERS" SAID NOT TO WORRY, THEY'D EXTEND OUR "CREDIT" .

AND SO, HERE WE ARE.

BUT, ONCE AGAIN, A FEW REALLY GOOD MEN HAVE SOUNDED OUT NEW WARNINGS..."WAKE UP, AMERICA, YOU'VE BEEN DUPED!"

SOME LISTENED, EVEN THOUGH THE TRUTH WAS SCARY, EVEN THOUGH THE TRUTH HURT.

BUT NOT ENOUGH LISTENED. AND THOSE WHO HAD NOT HEARD THE WARNINGS BEGAN TO LOATHE THOSE WHO HAD, DERIDING THEM, DENYING THERE WAS ANYTHING TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT, UNTIL FEWER AND FEWER REPEATED THE WARNINGS.

AND SO, HERE WE ARE. WE'RE
HEADING INTO A SILENT SLAUGHTER OF THE LAMBS, THE DOCILE SHEEP WHO
STILL THINK THINGS ARE JUST FINE, THAT WE CAN TRUST OUR GOVERNMENT AND
OUR BANKS AND OUR ELITE CLASS AND THE U.N. GLOBALISTS AND THE
"INTELLIGENTSIA", THE EXPERTS, TO HANDLE THINGS FOR US.

THEY'LL BE CALLING UP OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS TO WAR AGAIN SOON, QUADRUPLING THE U.S. FORCES OVERSEAS.WHEN WE KISS THEM GOODBYE, WE REALLY SHOULD APOLOGIZE TO THEM...FOR NOT HEEDING THE WARNINGS...AGAIN...AND AGAIN...AND AGAIN...

THAT WILL NOT SAVE THEIR LIVES, NOR BRING THEM BACK SAFELY TO US, BUT, AFTER ALL, THEY'LL BE "TAKEN CARE OF", RIGHT?

AND THIS NEW WAR WILL BE A "RIGHTEOUS" ONE, RIGHT?

AND IF THEIR BLOOD IS SPILLED ON THE SANDS OF SYRIA, OR IRAQ, OR ANYWHERE THEY'RE SACRIFICED TO, THEY'LL DIE AS PATRIOTS, YES?

"Brzezinski's book is sublimely arrogant.
While singing the praises of the INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND and the WORLD BANK,
which have economically terrorized nations on every continent,
and while totally ignoring the worldwide terrorist actions
of the U.S. government that have led to genocide; cluster
bombings of civilian populations from Kosovo to Laos to
Iraq to Afghanistan; the development and battlefield use
of both biological and chemical agents such as Sarin gas;
and the financial rape of entire cultures, it would leave
the reader believing that such actions are for the good
of mankind.

While seconded from the German defense
ministry to NATO in the late 1970s, Dr. Johannes Koeppl
traveled to Washington
on more than one occasion.

He also met with Brzezinski in
the White House on more than one occasion.

His other Washington
contacts included Steve Larabee from the CFR, John J. McCloy,
former CIA Director, economist Milton Friedman, and officials
from Jimmy Carter's Office of Management and Budget.

He is the
first person I have ever interviewed who has made a direct
presentation at a Bilderberger conference and he has also
made numerous presentations to sub-groups of the Trilateral
Commission.

That was before he spoke out against them.

His fall was rapid after he realized that
Brzezinski was part of a group intending to impose a world
dictatorship.

"In 1983/4 I warned of a take-over of world
governments being orchestrated by these people.

There was
an obvious plan to subvert true democracies and selected
leaders were not being chosen based upon character but upon
their loyalty to an economic system run by the elites and
dedicated to preserving their power.

"All we have now are pseudo-democracies."

In 1983, Koeppl warned, through Op-Ed pieces
published in NEWSWEEK and elsewhere, that Brzezinski and
the CFR were part of an effort to impose a global dictatorship.

His fall from grace was swift. "It was a criminal society
that I was dealing with. It was not possible to publish
anymore in the so-called respected publications. My 30 year
career in politics ended."

"The people of the western world have been
trained to be good consumers; to focus on money, sports
cars, beauty, consumer goods. They have not been trained
to look for character in people.

Therefore what we need
is education for politicians, a form of training that instills
in them a higher sense of ethics than service to money.

There is no training now for world leaders.

This is a shame
because of the responsibility that leaders hold to benefit
all mankind rather than to blindly pursue destructive paths.

"We also need education for citizens to
be more efficient in their democracies, in addition to education
for politicians that will create a new network based upon character and social intelligence."

Koeppl, who wrote his 1989 doctoral thesis
on NATO management, also authored a 1989 book - largely
ignored because of its controversial revelations - entitled
"The Most Important Secrets in the World."

As to the present conflict Koeppl expressed
the gravest concerns, "This is more than a war against terrorism.
This is a war against the citizens of all countries. The
current elites are creating so much fear that people don't
know how to respond. But they must remember. This is a move
to implement a world dictatorship within the next five years.
There may not be another chance."

~ HOW THE FED FINANCED WW1 The result of all these machinations was a significant inflation, which
varied between 13% and 20% for most of the war, up from the 1% inflation
rate experienced in the Fed's first year. By 1920 a dollar would buy
about half the goods it was capable of purchasing in 1914.~ Trillion Dollar Coin