This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

So you still refuse to answer the question. Sweet! Whether or not it's already happening is irrelevant .... I want to know if you support it or not. Still won't answer a very simple question?

What are you hiding?

Here it is for you ONCE AGAIN. If you can't get this **** you're hopeless. I don't give a ****. I'm not supposed to give a ****. In the profession I am in you have rules, ethics etc you follow. End of story. You don't care about if you want to or not. It's part of the job and is there for ethical and legal reasons. If there's an investigation into someone else dealing with these rules I don't give a ****. I worry about myself and my own ethics and following the rules/laws. If I suspect someone else isn't you do what is proper and that is it and leave it to the people who do the investigations. That's it. I've wasted a damn hour on you.

Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82

Here it is for you ONCE AGAIN. If you can't get this **** you're hopeless. I don't give a ****. I'm not supposed to give a ****. In the profession I am in you have rules, ethics etc you follow. End of story. You don't care about if you want to or not. It's part of the job and is there for ethical and legal reasons. If there's an investigation into someone else dealing with these rules I don't give a ****. I worry about myself and my own ethics and following the rules/laws. If I suspect someone else isn't you do what is proper and that is it and leave it to the people who do the investigations. That's it. I've wasted a damn hour on you.

Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

Originally Posted by humbolt

MEETINGS AND EVENTS

Short-quoted for band-width.
Since I know you from before DP, just noting how much fun you righties are having with Warren and the new poster.

There are plenty of DEM strategists calling Clinton out for an explanation.
Righties have already forgotten that Maddow and O'Donnell broke the email story Monday night, without defending her.
Followed by the New York Times trashing her the next two days and now HuffPo.
I'm actually seeing more defense on CNN rather than MSNBC, which highlights these emails each hour.

You would enjoy watching FOX/Baier at 6:00 Eastern--I never miss it when I'm at home unless there's a big sports event.

The next big DEM candidate is ex-Gov. O'Malley.
This was confirmed in my mind when Van Hollen chose to run for Mikulski's open Senate seat, with O'Malley bowing out .