Sanders v. U-Haul International Inc.

March 31, 2006

DAVID SANDERS, PLAINTIFF,v.U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL INC., U-HAUL OF ARIZONA, AND AMERCO, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge.

ORDER

Now before the Court is Sander's motion to leave to conduct limited discovery on the issue of personal jurisdiction (Doc. 20).*fn1 Specifically, Sanders claims that he needs to conduct minimal discovery to appropriately respond to the pending motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Defendants oppose the motion arguing that allowing discovery on this issue will cause further delays, is inappropriate and prejudicial to Defendants U-Haul International and AMERCO (Doc. 21). The Court agrees with Defendants. The Court finds that allowing discovery on this issue would be prejudicial to Defendants. Further, Plaintiff should have resolved this issue well before filing the instant lawsuit. Said motion is DENIED. The Court ALLOWS Sanders up to an including April 7, 2006 to file a response to the pending motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed the 31st day of March, 2006.

David RHerndon United States ...

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.