BILL OF RIGHTS-- First Amendment - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.-- Second Amendment -A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed-- Third Amendment - No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law-- Fourth Amendment - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.-- Fifth Amendment - No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.--Sixth Amendment - In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.-- Seventh Amendment - In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law-- Eighth Amendment - Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted-- Ninth Amendment - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people--Tenth Amendment - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people--.

You are here: Home » Cannabis » SIXTH CIRCUIT: CONSENT GIVEN WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF MORPHINE IS FREELY AND VOLUNTARY

SIXTH CIRCUIT: CONSENT GIVEN WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF MORPHINE IS FREELY AND VOLUNTARY

The Sixth Circuit found that McCellon Montgomery was capable of freely and voluntarily giving consent, allowing the police to search his property despite being in the hospital under the influence of morphine within hours of being shot in his back by an unknown assailant.

Montgomery was on his back porch. He was shot with birdshot or buckshot by someone hiding in nearby trees. His girlfriend called the police. The police could not find the shooter but they did see marijuana paraphernalia in the kitchen and the smell of marijuana coming from a shed in the back yard.

While they told Montgomery that they were searching for the shooter they were more anxious to find the marijuana in the shed. He gave consent. Police searched the property and found marijuana upstairs in the house and in the shed. He was charged with possession.

While being under the influence of drugs may result in consent being found to be involuntary, the court looked at other factors and found the consent to be voluntary. The nurse as the hospital testified that Montgomery was alert and oriented. Likewise the officers who asked for Montgomery’s consent found him to be lucid.

Despite testimony from his girlfriend and her mother both of whom testified that he had trouble talking the trial court and the appellate court found him to be capable of giving a knowing and voluntary consent.

But how knowing is the consent if you consent to a search for the assailant while the police search for marijuana?

C. Zadik Shapiro

The Law Offices of C. Zadik Shapiro provides representation in the following areas: criminal defense, administrative law, unemployment law and family law. It also represents people before governmental boards and commissions. Read more »