98 Royal Copenhagen's Christmas Plate has a history It began in 1908 with the first Christmas Plate. And ever since, for every ChrIstmas a new plate has been issued. Here you have a list of them all. We don't sell antiques, so we can only offer you our 1974-plate It's called "Winter Twilight" and depicts a watchful owl perched above a quiet, snowcovered Scan- dinavian wood. :, $22.00. $., 1908. Madonna 1940. The Good and Child Shepherd 1909. Danish landscape 1941. Danish Village 1910. The Magi Church 1911. Danish landscape 1942. Bell-tower of old 1912. Elderly couple by Church in Jutland the Christmas tree 1943. The Flight of the 1913. Spire of the Holy Family to Egypt Frederik Church 1944. Typical Danish 19/4. Spdrrows in tree \Vinter Scene /9/5. Danish landscape 1945 A peaceful motif /9/6. The Shepherds /946 Village Church in the field 1947. The Good /917 The Tower of Our Shepherd Saviour's Church 1948 Nødebo Church 19/8. The Shepherds 1949. Our Lady's 1919. In the Park Cathedral, Copenhagen /920 Mary with the 1950 Boeslunde Church Child Jesus 1951. Christmas Angel /92/ Mark.et-place 1952. Christmas in /922. Three singing the Forest angels 1953. frederiksborg /923 Danish landscape Castle 1924 The Christmas 1954 Amalienborg star over the sea Palace Copenhagen 1925 Street scene from 1955. Fano Girl Christianshavn 1956. Rosenborg Castle 1926 View of 1957. The Good Christianshavns canal Shepherd 1927. The ship's boy 1958 Sunshine over at the tiller Christmas Gl eênland night 1959. Christmas Night 1928. The Vicar-family 1960. The Stag on the way to Church 1961. The Training 1929. The Grundtvig Ship Danmark Church, Copenhagen 1962. The Little 1930. Fishing-boats Mermaid at Winrertime 1931. Mother and Child 1963. Højsager Mill 1932 Frcderiksberg 1964. Fetching Gardens with statue of the Christmas tree Ft ederik VI 1965. Little Skaters 1933 The Ferry and 1966 Blackbird and the Great Belt Church 1934. The Helmitage 1967 The Royal Oal<. Castle 1968. The Last Umiak 1935. Fishing-boat off 1969. The Old Farmyard Kronborg Castle 1970. The Christmas 1936. Rosk.ilde Cathedral Rose and Cat 1937. Christmas scene 197/. Hare in Winter in Copenhagen 1972. In the Desert 1938. The Round 1973. Going home for Church in Østerlars Christmas 1939. Expeditionary ship In the pack-ice of Greenland Available at fine stores everywhere and from aUf shop: ., -- ROY.\L COPE H-\GEN PORf:ELAIN 573 MadIson Avenue Neru York 10022 to have the same kind of nervous under- tone. MAY 5 S UNDAY. Last night, in Spokane, at the opening of Expo '74, the Pres- ident referred to Governor DanIel E vans, of Washington, as "Governor E . d " VI ence. . I N an interview with reporters on FrIday, Gerald Ford said that he was "a little disappointed" by the tran- scripts. He said that this was not the Nixon he had known for twenty-five years. . W ILLIAM RANDOLPH HEARST, JR., a long-time supporter of the President, has come out against the President. Hearst said that the tran- scripts "add up to as damning a docu- ment as it is possible to imagine short of an actual Indictment." Someone rushed over to tel] me about It at the tennis courts yesterday. . A GALLUP poll published yesterday says that by more than two to one the people queried believe that the Judiciary Committee was right to re- ject the President's offer of edited tran- scripts instead of tapes. That's higher than the proportion of the Judiciary Committee who thought so. MAY 6 T IME to try to get a sense of the reaction on Capitol Hill. I phoned Senator Robert Dole, Republican of Kansas, who is up for reëlection this year. I began by asking how he was. "Running hard, running scared," he replied. "I really haven't heard much. Last week, we were all going around saying, 'We haven't read it, we shouldn't comment.' Nobody thinks he's better off." A Democratic senator : "My impres- sion is it's hurting the President bad. I was interested in the poll r the recent Gallup poll on the committee's reaction to the transcripts] after his speech about the transcripts last week, which every- one thought was the best of his career. People will give you a chance. Then you slowly wear out your welcome. Then the burden shifts against you. He has no reservoir of good will. I haven't heard one person say the release of the transcripts was good for him. One pro- Nixon Southerner-at least, I assume he has been pro-Nixon-said, 'That does it for me.' 1 don't think anyone was surprised except by one thIng: I don't think they knew what a small person he was. Senators, like ever)- body else, have huilt the Presidenc) up, and now they see thIs and don't know what to make of it. The tone and the language are having an impdct-a greater impact, even, than what was actually said. The impression will last. So even if he stays in he won't be able d 1 . " to 0 anyt lIng. MAY 7 A REPORTER stops me in a Sen- ate hallway this morning. He thinks I would like to know what Hugh Scott just said. Hugh Scott, the Senate Minority Leader just met with reporters and saId that the transcnpts reveal "a shabby, disgusting, immoral performance by all those involved." Scott did not say whether he found im- peachable behavior in them, and djd not say whether he thought the Presi- dent was in compliance with the com- mIttee's subpoena. . I GO to see Charles Wiggins It is clear that this Republican, fro111 Richard Nixon's original California congressional district, wil1 be highly important In the House Judiciary Com- mittee. A defense of the President by him would be powerful and effective. If he ended by voting to impeach the President, it could make the decisive difference among House Republicans. Wiggins is dressed, as usual, in Califor- nia-sporty style: olive-green trousers, a green-and-white striped cord jacket, a green tie, white loafers that are either GUCCIS or a good facsimile. \Viggins also has the California style of apparent openness and easiness. What one is looking for is his cast of mind as he goes through this process. One clue: he says he will look to see "whether the totality warrants the kind of drastic surgery that involves the removal of a P . d " reSI en t. I ask him what in his mind would constitute ground for impeachment. "Something damn serious," he re- plies "1 suppose if I had to define a ground that would be appropriate to all cases, I would define It rather broadl), to prepare for all future contingencies. But the committee isn't caned upon to find an answer that is chiselled in stone. In this case, the question is whether the President was deeply and personally involved in serious mIscon- duct that would bar his continuing in office. " I ask him how he came to that conclusion. "We're dealing with charges here, not hypothetical situations," he says. "The