A new paper by a pair of Australian astronomers has provided
a flat-out, indisputable confirmation of the Hoagland\Torun Hyperdimensional
Physics Model, first proposed in their 1989 paper, “The
Message of Cydonia.” The new paper,
titled “Does
a Spin Orbit Coupling Between the Sun and the Jovian Planets Govern the
Solar Cycle?” points out a resonant,
synchronized relationship between the Sun’s periodic peak sunspot
cycles and the orbital positions of the Jovian planets -- Jupiter and
Saturn. Careful readers of Dark
Mission will note that this exact relationship, is both
implicitly and explicitly predicted in Chapter 2 of our book.

While the mechanical cause of the increased sunspot activity
is reasonably well understood (it’s caused by the sun’s rotation),
the driving force linking this spin and the sunspot cycle has remained
a mystery. According to Dr. Ian Wilson of the University of Southern Queensland,
which published the new research, observations by solar astronomers have
concluded that the equatorial regions of the sun rotate slightly more
rapidly than the polar regions (below - b). This differential rotation
winds up the sun’s magnetic field lines (which stretch between the
two poles) like a set of tightening rubber bands (below-a).

Eventually, the field lines work their way to the surface
of the sun because the concentrated magnetic flux is more buoyant than
the surrounding solar surface (above-c). This subsequently causes sunspots,
solar flares and
coronal
mass ejections, which tend to cluster around the "tetrahedral"
19.5° latitudes (north and south!) at the peak of this cycle
(below).

This peak is called “solar maximum” because
all the visible spots, flares, etc. are most numerous at this time, after
which the magnetic poles reverse and the cycle begins again.

There has historically been a recognized connection between
the frequency of sunspot activity (the total number of spots) and the
movement of the sun in relation to solar system's “barycentre”
-- or, center of mass (below). This is driven primarily by the combined
gravitational forces of Jupiter and Saturn, and to a far lesser extent,
the other planets. But the big problem is that there is no conventional
explanation for exactly how this influence occurs.

"There are really only two possible interactions,
and neither of them is feasible," Dr. Wilson said in
an interview. "Tidal forces are too tiny. They can only
produce a movement of about a millimeter on the surface of the sun.

"The alternative, that the sun's motion about
the centre of mass should be able to generate internal motions
within the sun, violates Einstein's equivalence principle [emphasis
added] ...."

What separates this new research from previous interpretations
is the observation that the relative positions of Jupiter and Saturn somehow
affect this cyclical energy variation. To quote from an article
about Wilson et al.’s paper appearing on the
Australian ABC science website:

“The authors believe the tiny gravitational
tugs of Jupiter and Saturn speed up or slow down the sun's orbital
motion about the centre-of-mass, when they are aligned or separated
by an angular distance of 90 degrees.

“They say that when the sun's orbital motion
changes, so too does its equatorial rotation rate, which provides
strong circumstantial evidence that there is a spin-orbit coupling
mechanism operating between Jupiter and Saturn and the sun.

“The authors propose that this spin-orbit
coupling takes the form of a 9:8 resonance, with the 179 year alignment
cycle of the Jovian planets being equal to nine alignments of Jupiter
and Saturn and eight 22-year
Hale cycles.

“The extent to which Jupiter and Saturn affect
the sun's motion may impact on the strength of sunspot activity
throughout its solar cycle.

"But Wilson is cautious.

"It is one thing to show an association and
quite another to show cause and effect. We have to be very careful,
but we will know in a few years,"

Of course, the reality is that as long as solar astronomers
keep searching for a conventional “gravitational” effect for
this resonance synchronization, they will never fully understand
what is causing the differential rotation -- and the consequent variable
excess energy from the sun. In the conventional view, it is mass -- and
therefore "gravity" -- which is the only viable influence
on solar energy output and motion.

But in the Hyperdimensional Physics Model, “the
tail wags the dog” -- in the form of angular momentum.

It is an undeniable fact that Jupiter and Saturn -- which
possess only a tiny fraction the solar system’s total mass compared
to the sun – are, in fact, a huge influence on the sun itself (and
all of the other planets as a consequence). This is because they conversely
possess most (almost 99%) of the solar system’s total bulk angular
momentum.

In the Hyperdimensional Model, it is this angular momentum
-- mainly from these two massive planets, transmitted through the “Hyperdimensional
aether” -- which ultimately causes the sun’s differential
rotation.

To quote directly from Dark Mission,
Chapter 2:

“... changes in one gravitationally-connected
system on a large scale, like the planetary scale of a solar system,
can therefore have an instantaneous, measurable effect on other
bodies in the same system -- providing there is a "resonance
condition" (a matched connection) between those two objects
via hyperspace. Thus, the Hyperdimensional Model argues that everything,
even widely separated three-space objects like remote planets, are
ultimately connected through this four-space interaction; meaning
that a cause in one place (like Jupiter) can have an effect
in another (like the sun) -- without any measurable
3D force (such as an electromagnetic wave) having measurably traversed
the three-space distance in between [emphasis added] ...."

In this "classical" Einsteinian view of physics
(after 1905 ...), there is no "aether” -- as it was called
in Maxwell’s day (mid-1800's) -- to carry electromagnetic radiation's
transverse waves across the vacuum. In the Hyperdimensional Model (circa
1983 ...), the aether is back -- as "the actual transformation
medium" between the higher spatial realities and our dimension
-- through something called "the
torsion field.…”

This whole notion, that the changing (orbital) configuration
of a planets (or star’s) system members relative to the “primary”
can have an effect on its total energy output, is revolutionary to current
thinking, but hardly without precedent.

In the 1940s, the Radio Corporation of America (RCA)
hired John Nelson, a young electrical engineer, in an effort to improve
the reliability of short-wave radio communications around the Earth. Such
radio transmissions had been observed to be more reliable in the "lulls"
in between solar activity associated with "peak" sunspot years.

To his surprise, Nelson (via a solar observatory he built
himself on the roof of a downtown New York skyscraper - below) soon specifically
correlated this rising and falling radio interference with not only the
sunspot cycle, but with the motions of the major planets of the
solar system!; Nelson found, to his increasing astonishment, a very repeatable
-- in
essence, "astrological" -- correlation
... between the inexorable orbits of the planets (especially Jupiter,
Saturn, Uranus and Neptune -- which hold essentially all the
solar system's known angular momentum) and major radio-disturbing eruptions
on the sun.

The Hyperdimensional Model finally provides a comprehensive
theoretical explanation -- a "linking mechanism" -- for these
(to most astronomers) still embarrassing, decades-old RCA observations.
For, in essence, what John Nelson had rediscovered was nothing short of
”hyperdimensional astrology" -- the ultimate, very ancient,
now highly demonstrable angular momentum/torsion foundations
behind the fundamental (though unseen ...) influences of the
sun and planets on our lives.

For over 30 years, based only on the heliocentric
positions of the planets, John Nelson was able -- with
over 90% accuracy -- to successfully predict sunspots,
solar flares and geomagnetic storms -- something not possible by any other
current scientific means!

On the latter point, Nelson also
"rediscovered" something else:

"... it is worthy of note that in 1948, when
Jupiter and Saturn were spaced by 120º, and solar activity
was at a maximum, radio signals averaged of far higher quality for
the year than in 1951 with Jupiter and Saturn at 180º and a
considerable decline in solar activity. In other words, the average
quality curve of radio signals [reflected by the Earth's ionosphere]
followed thecycle curve between Jupiter and Saturn
rather than the sunspot curve [emphasis added] ....”

These decades-old observations are very telling ... not
only confirming Jupiter and Saturn as the primary drivers behind the sun's
known cycle of activity (in the Hyperdimensional Model ...), but strongly
implying an additional direct effect of their changing angular
relationship on the electrical properties of Earth's ionosphere.
This, of course, is totally consistent with these changing planetary geometries
affecting not just the sun, but the other planets simultaneously as well
-- just as "conventional" astrologers have claimed -- but, in
actuality, via Maxwell's "changing scalar potentials” (i.e.
torsion fields ...).

At this point, then, only the Hyperdimensional Theory:

1. Points to the deepest implications of the simple
astronomical fact that the tail “does wag the dog" -- that
the planets in this Physics are fully capable of exerting a determinant
influence on the sun – and on each other -- through their disproportionate
ratio of total solar system angular momentum: over 100 to 1, in the
(known) planets' favor.

3. Has already publicly identified, at the United
Nations in 1992, a blatant geometric clue to this entire hyperdimensional
solar process: the maximum sunspot numbers (those large, relatively
cool, rotating vortices appearing on the solar surface), rising, falling
and methodically changing latitude, during the course of the familiar
twenty-two-year solar cycle—and peaking every half-cycle (around
eleven years), at the solar latitude of 19.5º.

Don’t you just love it ... when a good
theory comes together so elegantly?

Make no mistake, if this Wilson et al. paper is widely
accepted, somebody will eventually concoct a tenuous conventional
"explanation" to rationalize the observations. But that theory
will hold no more weight than the absurd “radiation degradation”
idea that was floated about a few years ago to explain Iapetus' "...
60,000-foot-high equatorial wall."

At some point, modern physicists will just have to face
the unpleasant reality – Einstein was wrong about the aether;
and Maxwell’s original “hyperdimensional physics/aether model”
was right.