Boys who have a streak of cruelty in their character often take earthworms
or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them
twist and writhe as they slowly die. God's People enjoy capturing an Aryan--currently
a hapless Ukrainian named Demjanjuk--and taking him to their Holy Land
and impaling him on legal fictions to enjoy watching the creature twist
and writhe, doubtless chuckling as they observe what he will do and say
in the hope of saving his life.

One form of torture used is one of the subtlest devised by the Holy
Inquisition. You may recall a memorable description of it in a short story
by Villiers d'Isle-Adam. The victim of applied Christianity is condemned
to death and then given opportunities to escape from his dungeon and the
fortress; each time at various points along the route to freedom he narrowly
escapes discovery and has to remain in mortal terror for a time before
he can go on to the next point; of course, it is at the last point, when
he is on the very verge of effecting his escape, that he is discovered
and hauled back to his dungeon to recuperate until he is in condition to
perform in another comedy for the pleasure of godly sadists.

The governments of the Jews' principal possessions in North America,
Canada and the United States, have established, at the expense of their
taxpaying animals, official gangs of terrorists to corral an abundant supply
of victims for the show in Jerusalem, which will probably be made a three-ring
circus as soon as Demjanjuk is disposed of. Whether he is finally murdered
or dismissed as a dehumanized but living husk of tortured flesh and blighted
mind is not important.

Keeping the arena supplied for the entertainment of God's Own is only
one secondary purpose of the terrorism. (1)

(1. Cf. Liberty Bell, August 1988, pp. 1-8.)

Primarily the "Nazi-hunters" are charged with a triple function: first,
to make a mockery of all the principles of Roman and Germanic law and teach
their Aryan swine that there is no law except the pious whims of Yahweh's
Yammering Yids; second, to show the rest of the world how despicable are
the Aryan curs who will do anything their masters command, and who fawn
on the masters and lick their boots even after having been kicked in the
snout; and third and most important, to stage show trials at which teams
of godly perjurers can tell fancy stories about how they witnessed the
awful "Holocaust" (and miraculously escaped). Their lies will impose on
the boobs and make them believe that the Holohoax is more than a gigantic
swindle by the Masters of Deceit.

An unlimited supply of witnesses is always at hand. (As everyone knows,
the Holy Talmud provides that every means of exploiting the lower animals
is approved and ordained by the ferocious god of the Christians' "Old Testament,"
and, even if that were not so, God's People at an annual ceremony revoke
and absolve themselves of all oaths they may take during the coming year.)
The witnesses will probably be rehearsed before each show to prevent enthusiastic
perjurers from claiming that they saw the wicked Germans touch lighted
matches to baby Kikes and make them blaze like torches of pitch pine soaked
in kerosene, or from affirming that they could tell from the color of the
smoke whether the sacred Sheenies then being incinerated came from Hungary,
Poland, or some other country. Despite the best efforts of schools and
boob-tubes, there are still Aryans intelligent enough to be unconvinced
by such exuberant exercises of malevolent fancy.

Probably because some Englishmen are beginning to feel misgivings about
the Holohoax, Prime Ministress Maggie, the well-known mannequin created
by a pair of malodorous Sheenies whose parents crawled into England from
Iraq in 1945, (2) and her staff of Jews and prostituted Britons decided
to bless the demoralized survivors of a once great nation with a terrorist
gang, similar to the "Office of Special Investigations" in the United States.
The pimps in the House of Commons obediently enacted the revocation of
British law by an overwhelming majority. But the treasonous measure was
rejected by the House of Lords, also by an overwhelming majority. That
was noteworthy, even astonishing at first sight.

(2. See Liberty Bell, July 1986, pp. 1-7.)

Despite what you probably heard from a "Liberal" gasbag, if you took
a course in "Political Science" or Modern History when you were in college,
the House of Lords has always been the moderator that preserved, as best
it could, the stability of Great Britain and the vaunted liberty of Englishmen.
It may be compared to the governor that prevents a steam engine from running
ever faster until it destroys itself. It is true that the Lords sometimes
failed when they should have acted, but the decline of Great Britain may
be measured by the successive reductions in the power of the House of Lords.
What may have astonished you was that that body still has a sense of responsibility
and integrity.

The doom of Britain, then Great, was made inevitable in 1911, when,
with the shameful connivance of the new and weak king, George V, the British
constitution was irretrievably shattered by stripping the House of Lords
of its power to veto deleterious legislation (it now can only delay it
for a short time), and by permitting the members of the House of Commons
to pay themselves from the public treasury. That made possible the rise
of thugs like Lloyd George and eventually scum like Harold Wilson. And
it made possible the suicidal folly of the First World War. (3)

(3. The work of substantive treason was carried out by
the Liberal Party, a pack of male ideologues and sentimental females, headed
by Asquith, a moral weakling who loved peace so much that he precipitated
the First World War, much as another weakling, Chamberlain, completed the
suicide of Britain by beginning the Second World War. Asquith is credited
with an asinine justification of his war: if Britain did not destroy Germany,
British industry would have to work harder to retain its dominance of the
world's markets. The Jews, needless to say, worked zealously, as usual,
to subvert and destroy Britain, but, so far as I know, no one has made
a detailed study of their part in contriving the fatal "reforms" of 1911.)

What is left of the hereditary aristocracy of one-great Britain, now
largely polluted by infusions of Jewish blood through miscegenation, (4)
has become demoralized and effete. Some have renounced their rank (see
the listing of the peerage in the current issue of Whitaker's Almanach);
many were impoverished in one way or another by the Jews' sabotage of the
British Empire and Britain itself; some have been reduced to strange expedients
to maintain themselves; and almost all have been deprived of their ancestral
homes and their dignity. Most of the survivors seldom take the trouble
to attend sessions of the House of Lords, of which they are, of course,
members by heredity.

(4. See Liberty Bell, November 1983, pp. 1-4, with
the reference to 'Populism' and 'Elitism', pp. 60-67. The eminent
Jewish ethnologist, Dr. Alfred Nossig, may be right in claiming that even
"a single little drop" of Jewish blood will pervert and derange an Aryan's
mind.)

The House of Lords includes a considerable number of undisguised Jews
and a Lordly Rabbi, the peer of the Archbishops of Canterbury and York,
who, corrupt as they are, must wince when they have to look at him. Many
members are Jews pretending to be British or Mischlinge. The active
majority of the House is now largely composed of prominent politicians
who have been boosted into the peerage for disservice their country. (E.g.,
Anthony Eden became the Earl of Avon and Harold Macmillan was transformed
into Lord Stockton.) A particularly influential group within the House
is formed by the "Law Lords," ennobled jurists and eminent judges.

According the John Tyndall, the present House of Lords "consists of
much the same collection of wet liberals, Jew-lovers, and Hitler-haters
as the Commons." There is, however, the crucial difference that members
of the House of Commons, like American Congressmen, know that if they disobey
their Jewish masters in even the slightest matter, they will never be re‰lected,
whereas the Lords are not subject to that kind of control. Furthermore,
the peerage is still a mark of distinction, and a member of that order
is encouraged to retain his self-respect. The Lords, including Mischlinge
and, it seems, even some Jews, were not willing to descend to notorious
prostitution by open treason, formally revoking all British law and the
very concept of legality. Thus the overwhelming majority refused assent
to the outrageous act of the Commons.

One who spoke in favor of law was Lord Hailsham, who had been the Lord
Chancellor and head of Britain's legal system, which he did not wish to
see subverted and annulled. In his speech, he denounced the proposed legislation
as legal nonsense, but then he saw a Jew frowning at him, and despite his
security as a Lord for the rest of his life, he cringed and cowered before
his masters, and said, in abject apology:

"Sometimes when I look at my Jewish friends, I wonder how they
can possibly regard me, as a Christian and a Gentile, with other than detestation."

The noble lord need not wonder. 'Detestation' may not be the mot
juste, but he may be sure that his Jewish "friends," behind their bland
smiles and lubricated words:

1. Regard him with contempt as a specimen of an inferior species of
mammal. As is implied in the "Old Testament" (5) and explicitly stated
in the Talmud, only Jews are human beings, while dogs, cats, Aryans, Mongolians,
Semites, pigs, etc. are animals that cannot own property and are at the
disposal of the only race of humans;

2. Regard him with contempt for being so gullible as to believe their
patently fictitious Holohoax;

3. Regard him with even greater contempt for his moral imbecility. Believing
the canard that the Germans gassed or steamed or vaporized six million
Kikes, he is so fatuous as to be emotionally upset.

(5. In most of that collection of tales, written or edited
during or after the fifth century B.C., when the Jews' religion was drastically
converted from a polytheism to a misogynist henotheism, the Jews are the
exclusive concern of Yahweh, a god superior to the gods of inferior races,
whom he can beat up when they get into the way of his darlings, but when,
probably before the first century B.C., the Jews converted their religion
to a monotheism, it followed that they were the only race esteemed
by the only god. From that position, the doctrine in the Talmud
logically follows.)

A morally sound and rational Aryan in his place would have done no more
than wonder whether the Germans had not been a little too severe in exterminating
six million enemy aliens, members of a parasitic race that had officially
declared war on them in 1933 and was whole-heartedly determined to exterminate
all Germans, but would also reflect that the Germans, after all, had not
only given the invaders every opportunity to withdraw, but had made great
efforts, even financial, to help them emigrate. Viable nations and races
never feel responsible for what happens to other races.

The Jews, who, however much we may dislike them, are now the biologically
superior race, whose intense racial solidarity and the hatred of all other
races that unites them and enabled their small tribe of barbarous nomads
to conquer the world in less than three thousand years, would be only delighted
by extermination of six or sixty million Aryans or Semites or Mongolians.

The Japanese, who are a great nation and think of themselves as the
Yamoto, a "special race" (shido minzuku), would never do more than shrug
their shoulders, if they had exterminated six million Americans or Vietnamese
or Turks or Arabs or Chinese, although they might privately wonder whether
the policy had been mistaken and diminished their commercial prosperity,
and in the presence of foreigners their habitual courtesy would make them
say, "Very sorry. Excuse, please."

What is truly remarkable, the Chinese Communists, after the United States
installed them in power, notoriously and systematically murdered at least
twelve million of their own people, but even anti-Communist Chinese
do not have moralistic tantrums and imagine a racial guilt, although they
denounce the policy as having been destructive of Chinese culture and of
the genetically better part of the population.

The fact is that Aryans are the only race afflicted by a silly superstition
about the "sanctity of human life" and given to moralistic fits and snivelling
about the losses of other races, even today, when it is obvious that the
overcrowded planet can be saved for human life only by exterminations on
a scale hitherto unknown and unimagined.

For that matter, even Americans become idiotically hysterical only when
the Sacred Race is slighted. As I remarked a moment ago, when the Chinese
Communists were put in power by American traitors employed by the Jews,
they murdered millions of the Chinese, including the best part of the nation,
but although the Americans really had a moral responsibility, since they
delivered China to the Communists, they did not really care. A few Americans
expressed disapproval of the massacres, a very few perceived that China
had been made a potentially formidable enemy that would attack them when
that became expedient, and even fewer called for pre‰mptive action to avert
future disasters.

When Franklin Roosevelt's accomplice, Stalin, murdered twelve or more
million Ukrainians with special brutality, forcing them to starve to death
by confiscating their crops, some Americans expressed disapproval, and
some, who did not know that they were themselves being surreptitiously
subjected to Communist rule, remarked on the nature of Communists and feared
them, but no American was really worried, although the victims were fellow
Aryans, members of our minority and endangered race. No American felt guilty,
although he had a moral responsibility as a member of the nation that had
saved and established the Judaeo-Communist tyranny in Russia, (6) and he,
as a taxpayer, had worked hard to endow and sustain the inhuman butchers.

(6. In 1921 the United States made the first of its many
and costly efforts to subsidize and perpetuate in power the Judaeo-Communist
r‚gime that had been imposed by Jewish bankers on the unfortunate Russians.
See Liberty Bell, February 1989, pp. 26-27.)

4. Lord Hailsham may be certain that his Jewish "friends" regard him
with special contempt because he, an Englishman, citizen of a nation which
has for centuries coddled its invaders, feels guilt for what he imagines
the Germans did to the Kikes who had invaded their country.

Only the British and the Americans are so mentally confused and morally
perverted that they feel a racial guilt because (as they have been
made to believe) their fellow Aryans, the Germans, exterminated a few millions
of aliens of an enemy race on their territory. The extermination may have
been ill-advised and even cruel, but that would be a question for Germans
to consider and none of our business, since we in no way participated in
the supposed action.

That morbid perversion of morality merits the contempt of everyone,
no matter what his race, who has not lost all contact with the real world.
Although the Jews happily profit from moral idiocy, they recognize it as
one manifestation of the biological inferiority of their victims.

If the recently ennobled Lord Hailsham (7) wanted to feel guilty, he,
as an Englishman and Aryan, could have assumed rationally an unsupportable
burden of guilt for atrocious crimes:

1. As one small example out of thousands, he shared national guilt because
a Sheeny in British uniform had subjected Richard H"ss to fiendish tortures
for three whole days to extort from a broken and dehumanized mass of quivering
flesh a lying "confession" that could be used in putting over the mondial
swindle called "the Holocaust." (8) The Sheeny, to be sure, was merely
obeying the sadistic instincts of his race and the venomous hatred of all
other races that is the secret of his race's amazing power and bloody triumphs,
but he was able to do that only because the British permitted, encouraged,
and supported a sadism that undegenerate Aryans instinctively regard with
repulsion as savagery. Now multiply that example by a few thousand specific
instances of comparable guilt.

(7. He was the Right Honorable Quinton McGarel Hogg before
he was made a Life Peer, i.e., given a kind of second-class nobility which
will not be hereditary and pass to his heirs.)

(8. See Dr. Robert Faurisson, "How the British Obtained
the Confessions of Richard H"ss," Journal of Historical Review,
VII (1988), pp. 389-403.)

2. As an Englishman he shared the guilt for one of the most heinous
crimes of recorded history--the blood-guilt for the death or mutilation
of all the British civilians, men and women, who were killed or crippled
by the bombing raids carried out by German planes and rockets. Of the facts
there is no possible doubt. The Principal Secretary of the British Air
Ministry, J.M. Spaight, boasted in 1944 of Britain's brilliant strategy
in carrying out secretly intensive bombing of German open cities in order
to kill so many German non-combatants, innocent men, women, and children,
that Hitler would be forced to retaliate with bombing raids that would
kill enough British civilians, innocent men, women, and children, to generate
enthusiasm for a contrived war against the Germans, who would thus show
themselves so barbarous that they bombed open cities, in gross violation
of scores of solemn treaties between the nations of Europe and all the
canons of civilized warfare sanctioned by our racial sense of decency and
honor, which requires us to spare non-combatants in war.

Of the ghastly truth of Spaight's boast there can be no doubt; the facts
are established by the relative dates of the bombing attacks on open cities
in Germany and Britain.

There can be no crime more vile, more revolting, than the crime of a
government which contrives the death and mutilation of thousands of its
own people to obtain their willing participation in a war for their own
destruction. And by this atrocious and nauseating crime, the Judaized British
forfeited all claim to be a civilized nation. (9)

(9. The terrible crime was carried out secretly and without
the knowledge of the British, it is true, and the nation as a whole could
have escaped moral responsibility for it by hanging Churchill, Air Marshall
Sir Arthur Harris, Mr. Spaight, and other authors of the "grand strategy"
when the facts became known. This the British did not do; they thus assumed
the guilt as a nation and involved in that guilt every Briton who was adult
at that time.)

3. As an Englishman, he was guilty of the deaths of hundreds of thousands
of English men and women who, as soldiers or civilians, were killed in
an insane and suicidal war to appease the monstrous egomania of an half-English
sot, who served as a lackey to his Jewish masters, and who kept secret
all the offers of peace and preservation of Britain and its Empire made
by Adolf Hitler in his anxiety to avoid the destruction of an empire that
he recognized as indispensable to the world's equilibrium. The guilt of
Churchill included the foul treachery by which Rudolf Hess was lured to
Britain, imprisoned and tortured, in violation of all the practical standards
of war, observed even by barbarians, which guarantee the safety of an invited
envoy. (10) To call Churchill a beast is to defame all quadrupeds. The
inexpiable guilt was augmented by that of all the succeeding governments
of Britain, who kept Hess incarcerated under inhuman conditions until the
government of Prime Ministress Maggie finally murdered the aged and almost
helpless old man in a vain effort to preserve the heinous secret. (11)

4. And if the burden of guilt for satanically depraved crimes against
his own people was not sufficient for Lord Hailsham, he specifically shared
guilt for the agony and death of all the thousands of his fellow Aryans,
innocent men, women, and children, who perished in the fiery holocaust
of Dresden (12) and other open cities bombed by Englishmen who had ceased
to be human.

5. As an Englishman, he furthermore shared guilt for all the lives lost
in that war, which the Jews and their monster in the White House could
have contrived without use of Great Britain as a cat's paw.

6. He shared the guilt--but why continue? A chronicle of British guilt
for what they as a nation actually did to members of their race abroad
and to their own people would require a r‚sum‚ of British history
since 1914.

But of all the real guilt that Lord Hailsham could have taken as a crushing
burden on his own shoulders, he said not a word, but preferred to feel
an idiotic guilt for something that had never happened and in which Britain
was not even said to have had a part! And, so doing, he groveled like a
mangy and famished cur at the feet of his alien masters.

One of the miserable hirelings who scribble for the Jews in newspapers
that are British only in the sense that they are printed in Britain, quoted
the Lord's self-abasing words, which I transcribed above, and opined:

"He was surely speaking for every thoughtful person of the
Christian tradition."

There could be no clearer proof that the Jews' mystery religion,
a spiritual syphilis, has rotted the minds of our race and induced paralysis
of our will to live.

This article originally appeared in Liberty Bell magazine,
published monthly by George P. Dietz from September 1973 to February 1999.
For reprint information please write to Liberty Bell Publications, Post
Office Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA.