Whenever a hurricane occurs, whether it be a major hurricane or not, the Left is always quick to blame climate change and, by association, Republicans and mankind for the damage we do to our poor planet. Last year, some of the southeastern states were hit by a weaker hurricane than Harvey, named Hurricane Matthew. This year, the people of Texas have been the ones to suffer the effects of the hurricane, particularly Houston.

And it’s particularly BECAUSE of Houston getting flooded as much as it is that the Left wants to make a stronger case for climate change with this hurricane. Even though Houston has a long history of flooding by relatively minor rain, the Left will never miss an opportunity to point out climate change wherever they can.

But one climatologist acknowledges the fact that, even though it’s uncommon for the hurricane to have stalled over Houston and caused so much rain in the area, it’s not a sign of our climate getting worse.

Dr. Roy W. Spencer wrote an article on his personal site titled “Why Houston Flooding Isn’t a Sign of Climate Change”. Now that title alone could easily trigger a liberal. He writes: “In the context of climate change, is what we are seeing in Houston a new level of disaster which is becoming more common? The flood disaster unfolding in Houston is certainly very unusual. But so are other natural weather disasters, which have always occurred and always will occur.”

He’s basically saying that natural weather disasters aren’t all typically the exact same. Which is rather obvious. A hurricane striking, say, Florida is going to be different to one striking Texas or New Jersey. And that’s because different variables are in place for each storm in each location. Even location itself is a variable. But just because a hurricane is doing things others typically and historically haven’t done doesn’t mean that climate change is at work here, or that Mother Nature is getting her revenge.

Dr. Spencer continues by saying that “floods aren’t just due to weather.” “Major floods are difficult to compare throughout history because the ways in which we alter the landscape. For example, as cities like Houston expand over the years, soil is covered up by roads, parking lots, and buildings, with water rapidly draining off rather than soaking into the soil… The Houston metroplex area has expanded greatly and the water drainage is basically in the direction of downtown Houston.”

As humanity expands and technology becomes more advanced and readily available, cities and towns start to become altered by new advancements in our civilization. Urban development naturally means that the landscape in the area will be changed, meaning that the way the water caused by rain or major storms is taken care of is changed. As Dr. Spencer said, with the city of Houston expanding, the water is steered in the direction of downtown Houston rather than being soaked up by the earth. Don’t ask me why the water is directed to downtown Houston, it’s just the way the city was built.

He continues to say “There have been many flood disasters in the Houston area, even dating to the mid-1800s when the population was very low. In December of 1935, a massive flood occurred in the downtown area as the water level height measured at Buffalo Bayou in Houston topped out at 54.4 feet. By way of comparison, as of 6:30 a.m. Monday morning, the water level in the same location is at 38 feet, which is still 16 feet lower than in 1935. I’m sure that will continue to rise.”

So we even know, as I said earlier in this article, that Houston has a history of getting flooded, with the worst of it seemingly happening in 1935.And that flood wasn’t even the result of a hurricane. It was just constant rains in the area causing the flood. Besides, this is 1935. The automobile at the time was largely steam-powered, with diesel engines beginning to be made only 5 years prior. Not to mention that the population was significantly less than today. So I highly doubt the Houston flood of 1935 was caused by mean, capitalist men polluting the planet.

Dr. Spencer goes on to talk about whether the rainfall totals were unprecedented, in which he says that the only thing unprecedented about the totals is WHERE they landed, not the amount of rainfall that happened.

He also talks about whether Harvey’s intensity was unprecedented, which he says that it’s really not, since in the last 44 years, we’ve had 4 Category 4 hurricanes strike the U.S., with 14 more in the last 88. Basically, we’ve actually had LESS intense hurricanes in the past half-decade.

He concludes his article by saying: “Weather disasters happen, with or without the help of humans.” And he’s completely right about that. Hurricanes have always happened in the history of the Earth in areas that get hurricanes. Some have been completely devastating, particularly one that hit Galveston in 1900, which killed between 6,000 and 12,000 people. While some have been without much fatality (particularly BECAUSE of technological advancements and innovation that the Left seems to despise).

The point is that hurricanes happen in the intensity they occur simply because God ordains it so. We have nothing to do with the frequency or intensity of any particular hurricane. If we actually COULD affect the weather in which the Left claims we can, then California would never go through any drought. We would increase all the factors that “contribute to climate change” in that area to solve California’s drought problem… at least in 50 to 100 years, according to the Left.

To me, the Left’s claims that we are capable of severely altering the weather is basically the equivalent to believing a rain dance would actually cause rain. The logic is about the same in both cases.

And, interestingly enough, both cases exclude God’s sovereignty on the Universe. It makes sense, since the Left doesn’t believe in God, they think we can become like gods. But we are mere humans, with mortal flesh. We can’t accurately predict what the weather will look like by the end of the week, and we can’t do anything to change what will happen. Only God has that power.

Psalm 135:6“Whatever the Lord pleases, He does, in Heaven and on Earth, in the seas and all deeps.”

Over the weekend, Texas was hit by Hurricane Harvey, with Houston getting the worst of the rain. And perhaps one of the biggest stories of this hurricane is what happened when a cab driver found a Cooper’s hawk hunkered down in his cab, frightened as can be.

William Bruso, the cab driver, made and uploaded a series of videos beginning with his encounter with the frightened bird, followed by him driving to his home and attempting to get the bird to fly away. After that update, however, things turned for the worst… at least for any liberal snowflake watching.

Bruso showed the bird, whom he’s caringly nicknamed “Harvey the Hurricane Hawk”, hanging out on a makeshift perch with a chicken heart for it to eat and some water next to that. Then, Bruso continued to narrate and the camera pans over to another person in the house. However, the shot also shows… wait for it… a confederate flag. *GASP* “How?! How could anyone hang a confederate flag in their own home? That must mean he’s racist!” was basically what some people in the comments section of the video were saying.

Yep. The conversation in the comments section went from being about this kind-hearted guy taking care of a frightened bird in the middle of a massive storm to being about how offensive the flag is and how racist or stupid he is. One guy literally commented “aww, what a nice g- oh **** sake there’s a confederate flag.”, which naturally garnered a bunch of attention from conservatives that defend Bruso for having the flag in his own home.

Funny enough, that one comment he made received over 600 responses from the last time I checked. Some of them were funny, with one saying “ah man this very nice guy just gave me 200 dollars to get out of debt and helped me through my hardest days… oh wow he has different views from me **** HIM.” Which actually got a response from the original commenter: “’Different views’ is like being a fan of different movies, different sports. Having a confederate flag hanging in your house does actually make you a bit of a dick, tbh.”

I’m willing to bet that the hawk doesn’t think Bruso is a “dick”. I bet that, if Harvey the Hurricane Hawk could talk, its first words wouldn’t be “wow, man, you have a confederate flag in your house? I’m outta here, you racist.” No, it’d probably be something along the lines of “wow, thank you sir! That freaky weather was scaring me! What’s that over there? That red thing with blue diagonal, crossing stripes and stars on it? Oh, who cares?!”

This guy went from being a generally well-liked person for saving this hawk and tending to it to being on the receiving end of hateful liberal comments that steer the topic of conversation away from the main point: the bird.

I’ve seen plenty of people throughout these video series saying negative things, or at least implying negative things about Bruso, with one person saying: “This confederate flag tells me all I need to know.” As though the flag definitely means that he’s racist and hateful and it makes his efforts to help out the poor bird null and void.

The good news is that not everyone in his comments section is a brainwashed, entitled social justice warrior who focuses on the wrong things. There are plenty of other people, good people that legitimately love what the guy is doing, regardless of the flag being there. And most don’t even mention the flag. They just care that the hawk is safe and sound and that the guy is doing the best he can with what he has to take good care of the bird.

But it’s truly sad that snowflake liberals will get triggered (that means annoyed or enraged) over the fact that he has a confederate flag and immediately assume he’s a racist, sexist, homophobic bigot and will completely forget the reason they even clicked on the video in the first place. Liberal hatred can truly cloud their minds, huh?They immediately forgot the video was about the well-being of a frightened bird and immediately focused on something that has absolutely nothing to do with the bird.

It’s a good thing the hurricane wasn’t named Hurricane Robert. Otherwise, things might’ve been worse. But it’s truly sad and ridiculous what Leftists get annoyed by and wish to make the big topic of conversation.

That’s liberal hatred in a nutshell. And the worst part is that they don’t recognize it as hate, even if you tell them. Antifa attacks people that have different opinions, but they don’t consider that as hateful. These people are judging the man that’s taking care of a scared bird not because of his actions, but because of what he adorns his home with. And they don’t see that as being hateful towards a guy who’s simply trying to take care of one of God’s creatures.

I’m thankful that there were mostly positive comments giving the guy praise for what he’s doing and even some giving him tips to take care of the bird (who is now under the care of a local wildlife organization). Most people who saw that video loved what the guy was doing for the bird during the storm and couldn’t care less about what he had in his home. Some people even LOVED that he had the confederate flag in his house and were defending him for having it.

I’m just glad to see that there were more positive comments than negative comments in this video. It just goes to show truly how in the minority that leftist way of thinking is. Most people that read those comments made sure to defend Bruso and his right to hang that flag, particularly IN HIS OWN HOME. And I’m certainly glad that most people didn’t even really care about the flag being there.

As I’ve said in the past: the Left may be loud, but they’re not the majority.

Genesis 1:26“Then God said, ‘Let us make Man in our image, after out likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”

When last Friday Sebastian Gorka announced his departure from Trump's White House I have to admit I was surprised. That was until I read Breitbart News' account of the story, in which they published a disclaimer indicating the news outlet and Gorka are fine-tuning a deal:

'Breitbart is currently in negotiations with Dr. Gorka regarding his support for the website, as well as collaboration on a joint venture that would embody a Jacksonian national security vision.'

This is not surprising as Steve Bannon had resigned a few days earlier and most likely both Gorka and Bannon had been discussing future beneficial deals while working for Trump.

I have nothing against people forging their future - networking and closing deals and making money honestly.

But I do have a problem with HYPOCRISY. And it seems to me that Gorka was nothing but a loud bulldog ready to use the power he was granted for personal gain.

He reminds me of a bad husband - you know 'Darling, I love you so much! I would give my life for you!! But don't bother me now, cause the Superbowl is on. And please, don't call me on my cell when I'm having drinks with my buddies....or when I'm out fishing. Any other time, I'm all yours. Oh, by the way, my love for you will last for as long as you stay young and pretty - after which I'll exchange you for a younger gal!!' This was Gorka, ready to 'fight for Trump' and 'be his bulldog', except if negotiations with Bannon move on to the next stage. After all money talks, it seems...

Then, the article moves on to quote the Council's statement referring to Gorka's resignation, in which they express their approval:

“We welcome the resignation of Sebastian Gorka as a presidential adviser… His extremist and Islamophobic views, and his reported past and current associations with racist and anti-Semitic groups, should have disqualified him from any government position.”

I'm not surprised that Breitbart News is pushing the story - to be honest, I don't think anybody cares that Gorka has left the White House. In fact, I don't think I saw the story anywhere else outside Breitbart since Friday. But, you see, they need the noise to produce profits.

But what I'm surprised about is the fact that Breitbart has said NOTHING about President Trump's accomplishments in his fight against Islamic Terrorism. The news organization doesn't say anything about the Caliphate in Mosul being absolutely destroyed during the first months of this administration, or the fact that Trump is expanding the number of troops in Afghanistan to...FIGHT ISLAMIC TERRORISM!

I can understand why the Left would try to divide conservatives. I can understand why CAIR or any other Islamic group would try to divide Americans. But why would a so-called 'respectable' news organization want to IGNORE Trump's determination to finish ISIS off?

Could it just be MONEY?

Are the Breitbart News folks still upset that Bannon left the White House?

Is it personal?

In any case I have to say I was disgusted at the idea that possibly Gorka and Bannon, who supposedly are all for draining the swamp, seem to be becoming part of the swamp and doing everything they say they dislike about the swamp to PROFIT from politics.

'Oh, Mr Trump! I'll be your bulldog...until I close this deal with Breitbart and start making some serious money!!'

Boy, what a short marriage this one was...

Greed is an ugly thing. Breitbart was Trump's #1 fan until Bannon left the WH. And it seems like now they're going down the path of the typical mainstream media - only telling you what they want you to know...and all for profit.

Matthew 6:24

"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money."

If you're following the news about Trump's approval rating of 39% you would think the entire country hates Trump. In the last couple of days, even after Hurricane Harvey, the Fake News media has continued on its relentless efforts to destroy Trump.

In an article published on Saturday 8/26 CNBC says:

'Donald Trump started as the most unpopular new president in the history of modern polling. After seven months, things have only gotten worse.Plunging into undesirably uncharted territory, Trump is setting records with his dismally low approval ratings, including the lowest mark ever for a president in his first year. In fact, with four months left in the year, Trump has already spent more time under 40 percent than any other first-year president.At 34 percent, his current approval rating is worse than former President Barack Obama's ever was.'

And CNBC is not alone. Here's LA Times:'Trump is shedding supporters like no other president in modern history'.

For example, they fail to tell you that in less than two months, French President Macron went from 64% approval rating in June to 34% today - apparently, the beloved anti-Trump, globalist French president isn't doing so well after all.

And to be perfectly honest, even Ronald Reagan's approval rating fell to 35% in his first term...and as we all know, he was re-elected nevertheless...

In other words, assuming these polls are correct - something extremely difficult to do based on the recent history of polling that had Hillary winning the presidency - what the media isn't telling you is that by no means these polls are reflective of a President's actual performance on the job.

In fact, when it comes to performance, Trump has:

Enforced immigration laws – illegal border crossings are down by a whopping 78%

Appointed and had Senate confirm his Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch

Signed more than 37 bills into law in his first 6 months in office.

Lessened Obamacare tax burdens via Executive Order

Weakened the Johnson Amendment that hurt the freedom of speech of tax-exempt religious organizations.

Sent 20 ATF agents to Chicago to help the city fight gun violence. By June 2017 the local US Attorney said his office had already prosecuted more gun violence cases in 2017 than in the entire year 2016.

Signed into law a Congressional Review bill annulling a recent Obama Administration regulation that would have prohibited States from discriminating in awarding Title X family planning funds to local clinics that perform abortions.

Appointed Dr Charmaine Yoest, a strong pro-life advocate and the former president of Americans United For Life, to the position of Assistant Secretary of Public Affairs for the Department of Health and Human Services.

Changed the focus of the Obama Administration’s immigration policy from ‘Citizenship and Integration Program’ to ‘Citizenship and Assimilation Program’

Instructed Education Secretary Betsy DeVos to review Education regulations with the objective of returning power to the States.

Approved the Keystone Pipeline.

Removed the US from the Paris Climate Change Agreement.

Lifted the ban imposed by the Obama Administration on offshore drilling.

Reduced the National Debt by $102 Billion

Created more than 1 million new jobs, and unemployment is at 4.3%, a 16-year low

And so much more...

But this list is exactly the kind of news the mainstream media doesn't want you to know.

So...should we be concerned about Trump's approval rating?

Nope.

What we should be concerned about is the GOP's LACK OF SUPPORT of our president.

Where's the Obamacare repeal and replace?

Where's Tax Reform?

If anybody should care about approval ratings is the GOP establishment - the Mitch McConnells of the world. Here we have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to pass a truly conservative agenda - Republicans own the WH, the House and the Senate - and yet their weakness and lack of COURAGE at this very crucial moment in our history is astonishing.

What can we, regular folks, do?

Pray, my friend - pray that God continues guiding and protecting our president and that He opens the GOP leadership's eyes and hearts to act...and do what they were elected to do.

1 Chronicles 28:20

'Then David said to Solomon his son, “Be strong and courageous and do it. Do not be afraid and do not be dismayed, for the Lord God, even my God, is with you. He will not leave you or forsake you, until all the work for the service of the house of the Lord is finished'

We all know Antifa. They are the self-proclaimed anit-fascists looking to “fight” racism. In reality, they just want to fight Trump and America. They hate capitalism because they don’t understand it and love communism for the same reason.

The Daily Wire wrote a story on Antifa, with a reporter going to Laguna Beach, California, where an Antifa protest was taking place.Austen “Fleccas” Fletcher, the reporter, asked multiple people at the protest exactly what and why they were protesting. And them being Leftists, it went about as comedic as you might expect.

When Fletcher asked one female protester what exactly she was protesting, she was having trouble defining the “alt-right”. “It’s kind of like, newer rightist ideology that tries to…” before admitting that she feels like an idiot because she was on the spot and couldn’t come up with anything. You’d think that if you hate something with a passion, you’d know exactly what it is and explain how despicable it is and would be able to justify why you hate it. This female protester was utterly incapable of defining what she considers her enemy. Is it a wonder they are so easily manipulated by the Left?

And she wasn’t the only one. Another protester tried his hand at explaining what his enemy was. “So the ‘alt-right’, I would call it a loose connection of this new wave right-wing sort of… not radicals… but they have a strong emphasis on white supremacy… maybe not even white supremacy, but more capitalism and closed borders.” By the way, those ellipses were not an indication that he said more things and I just summed up what he said. He actually took the time to think and try to structure his explanation.

But I love the fact that he said “maybe not even white supremacy”. THEN WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU PROTESTING HERE?! I thought Antifa was protesting against racists ever since Charlottesville. But now, IT’S NOT EVEN ABOUT RACISM?! Are they protesting racism or the ‘alt-right’? If they knew anything about American history, they would be protesting the DEMOCRATS’ RACISM. Because that’s the only party with a long history of treating people as less than people, which continues on to this day.

Another protester wearing a cap with a stuffed penis on his head, detailing exactly what he uses when thinking, was asked about immigration and, of course, advocated for open borders, even while admitting he had to do more “research” on the topic.

Yet another protester suggested that there “are only a small number of estimated Nazis in the country because ‘that’s probably registered Nazis’”, according to the Daily Wire. I see here the perfect teachable moment. If there are people registered to the Nazi party, do you know the exact name of the party? It’s the “National Socialist German Workers’ Party”. The Nazis are entirely SOCIALIST! And somehow, these protesters either didn’t know or didn’t care, because in the video provided by Fletcher, I saw multiple people wearing shirts that were pro-socialism. Two protesters even were convinced that communism was the way to go in ruling a nation, after claiming that we should “kill” all Nazis in the U.S.

Do they not realize that Nazis are closer to communists than right-wingers? That they are the very thing they claim to hate and be fighting? Are they that uninformed? They must be, since one of the two protesters I just talked about was a self-proclaimed “Libertarian-communist”. Talk about an oxymoron right there. If he knew what either of those things were, he’d know better than to call himself that.

And in case that particular uninformed person is reading this, let me explain the difference. You see, a Libertarian is someone who believes that the government should be as small as possible and should not be involved in people’s lives too much. While still believing there should be a government, a Libertarian wants a government that doesn’t regulate much and doesn’t own much, but simply does the bare minimum. That is to be able to protect its citizens from foreign and domestic threats and pass laws that don’t restrict people’s freedoms too much.

On the other hand, a communist believes the government should be in charge of nearly everything going on and that everyone should be solely dependent on the government. That the government should take care of everyone, give things to everyone for free and be, what we conservatives like to call, a “nanny-state”. So you see, a Libertarian is on the exact opposite side of the political spectrum from a communist. So there’s no such thing as a “Libertarian-communist”. The only people that would ever use that term are severely uninformed and brainwashed people that believe everything the media and the Left tells them without doubting or questioning everything.

And so now, we reach the title question. Is Antifa evil or just ignorant? Depends on who you’re talking about. The people on the ground, the protesters, are most likely simply ignorant and ill-informed pawns. The people that fund Antifa and run it, they are evil. They are the ones pitting American against American. Brother against Brother. Child against Mother. Neighbor against Neighbor. You get the point.

It’s the George Soros’s, Nancy Pelosi’s, Barack Obama’s and the Clinton’s of the world that are the evil ones. They pull the strings, and like perfect marionettes, their people dance to their masters’ will. They keep them uninformed or ill-informed to make sure none stray from them. They keep them in the dark, as was plainly evident from Fletcher’s video, for fear of being exposed by the Light. They, like Satan, despise the Light and seek to destroy it.

They delight in seeing Charlottesville go down the way it did. They delight in seeing their pawns do as was instructed. They delight in witnessing chaos from the safety of their own homes. They seek to destroy America and have found the perfect people to attempt to accomplish that task. The more uninformed people there are in America, the more people don’t know how truly vile and evil they are. And the more these evil people can sit in power.

It’s one of the reasons they want to destroy Trump. He stands in the way of that. It’s also one of the reasons they want to eliminate God from this country. They can’t flat out destroy Him, and they know that. But they CAN get people to ignore Him and be unaware of Him. Or beyond that: be angry at Him when things go wrong and ignore Him when things go right.

They deceive people into believing evil is good and good is evil. And these protesters are falling right into their traps.

Isaiah 5:20“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!”

On August 21st, 2017, President Trump announced that we’d be sending more troops (roughly 4000 more) to Afghanistan. Unfortunately, this new plan wasn’t well received by some pro-Trump news sources.

Laura Ingraham, a big Trump supporter, tweeted: “Who’s going to pay for it? What is our measure of success? We didn’t win with 100k troops. How will we win with 4000 more?” and “I thought we were going to drain the swamp in Washington, not clear the desert in Afghanistan”.

Brian Darling from Breitbart wrote: “I voted for Donald J. Trump because he promoted a foreign policy of restraint… I voted for Donald J. Trump because he promised change. I may have made a mistake.”

Tucker Carlson of Fox News also disapproved of Trump’s plan: “If the goal is to keep Islamic extremism from our shores, why is a war more effective than a vigorously enforced travel ban?”

They’re all wrong in what they say. Let’s begin with Laura. “Who’s going to pay for it?” The President had asked in the same speech that the U.S. would “ask NATO allies and global partners to support our new strategy, with additional troop and funding increases in line of our own.” Now, I’m not gonna trust that NATO will ever support Trump, but he has said that we will ask them to help us out in sending troops and funding them to fight.

“What is our measure of success?” Ultimate defeat of our enemies.That is our measure. “Our troops will fight to win. We will fight to win. From now on, victory will have a clear definition – attacking our enemies, obliterating ISIS, crushing al-Qaeda, preventing the Taliban from taking over Afghanistan and stopping mass terror attacks against America before they emerge.”

“We didn’t win with 100k troops. How will we win with 4000 more?” It’s not about the number of troops we send. It’s about the strategy we employ. Charles Maurice de Talleyrand, a former French Foreign Affairs Minister famously said: “I am more afraid of an army of 100 sheep led by a lion than an army of 100 lions led by a sheep.” Up until now, our strategy was a timetable-based one.

In his speech, Trump said: “As a result of our comprehensive review, American strategy in Afghanistan and South Asia will change dramatically in the following ways: A core pillar of our new strategy is a shift from a time-based approach to one based on conditions… Conditions on the ground, not arbitrary timetables, will guide our strategy from now on. America’s enemies must never know our plans or believe they can wait us out. I will not say when we are going to attack, but attack we will.”

Obama would tell our enemies when attacks would be carried out. That literally goes against The Art of War by Sun Tzu: “All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.”

So we will be employing a new strategy that will keep our enemies guessing as to when we will attack, knowing that an attack (and most likely, multiple attacks) is coming. And for that last part of Ingraham’s tweet? “I thought we were going to drain the swamp in Washington, not clear the desert in Afghanistan.” Who says we can’t do both?

Obama has been purposefully incompetent when it came to fighting ISIS and radical Islamic extremists. Trump inherited Obama’s mess with ISIS and, at the moment, ISIS is debilitated. With their relatively recent end to their caliphate, they have to regroup and establish a new caliphate somewhere else.We can’t let them catch a breath. They’ve gotten more chances to breathe than people in China. We can’t allow them to regroup and rethink their strategy. Part of the reason we’re going to Afghanistan is so that THEY CAN’T regroup, at least there.

Next is the guy from Breitbart. In short, I just think he’s exaggerating. Yes, Trump said a few years ago that it was a waste of time and money to send people to Afghanistan. But he’s also recognized that you think differently when you seat at the desk in the Oval Office. Even Trump in his speech recognized that his way of thinking was different.

“My original instinct was to pull out… But all my life, I have heard that decisions are much different when you sit behind the desk in the Oval Office. In other words, when you are President of the United States.” People change their minds all the time. Let’s just be grateful that he hasn’t changed his mind when it comes to the Wall or Climate Change. This war in Afghanistan should continue, as long as the President has a plan for ultimate victory, which I believe he does.

But to say that you “may have made a mistake” in voting for Trump because “he promoted a foreign policy of restraint… and promised change” and hasn’t done that in your mind is ridiculous. He promised a foreign policy in which America would come first and wouldultimately be victorious. He promised to “blow the **** out of ISIS”. That’s not restraint. That’s ensuring American victory, as he is doing with this new plan in Afghanistan.

And finally, Tucker Carlson. “If the goal is to keep Islamic extremism from our shores, why is a war more effective than a vigorously enforced travel ban?” Last time I checked, we’re doing both. The Supreme Court approved of a travel ban in June. But that travel ban didn’t include Afghanistan. And Afghanistan is still very much a part of the Islamic world, and therefore, is more than capable of producing al-Qaeda or ISIS terrorists.

Not to mention that a travel ban, as effective as it can be, doesn’t solve the problem of Islamic terrorism. War won’t either, but it will go a lot farther than a few travel bans here and there. Not to mention that there will definitely not be any travel bans on Islamic countries with a Democrat in the White House, which is bound to happen eventually (hopefully, not any time soon). So Trump’s strategy will work longer-term than travel bans will.

All in all, ensuring the ultimate success and safety of America should be, and is, the President’s biggest priority. That’s why I think Trump’s plan is great, because he will work to ensure that we are both safe and victorious against these evil forces. And part of that is NOT TELLING THE ENEMY WHAT WE’RE GONNA DO AND WHEN WE’RE GONNA DO IT!

War is never pretty and I wish it never had to happen. But in reality, there will always be people that are evil to the core.For as long as Man is on Earth, there will be evil in the world. And evil will never cease fighting until good is defeated. Islamists will never stop fighting until they are all either dead or rulers of Earth. The Left will never stop trying to destroy Trump. Even after he leaves office (hopefully in 8 years), they won’t stop destroying him. They will try to destroy his reputation and legacy like they have been doing with Reagan.

And it doesn’t help when Trump supporters disagree with the President’s actions this way. Yes, they can disagree all they want, but it only helps give the Left ammunition to take down Trump. Is Trump always right? No. He’s human, after all.But to tweet or write articles that are very obviously short-sighted is not gonna help Trump or our conservative cause.

2 Peter 3:7“But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the Day of Judgment and destruction of ungodly men.”

The Russia collusion narrative seems to have died down over the last several days, courtesy of a much more impactful event – Charlottesville. Both, undoubtedly, the creation of the Left. And the hysteria coming from the Left, its violence, vandalism of historic monuments combined with the abject ignorance of the past – the fact that it’s Democrats who created the Confederacy, fought the North to keep their slaves, created the first terrorist organization (the KKK) to regain power in the South and implemented Segregation – point only to one possible purpose: to violently overthrow Trump and take control of the government.

Whether or not they succeed, like they did in many other banana republics around the world, it’s entirely up to God.

But can you imagine what our president might accomplish if he didn’t have to fight the establishment on a daily basis?

So far Trump has:

Reduced regulations

Enforced immigration laws – illegal border crossings are down by a whopping 78%

Appointed and had Senate confirm his Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch

Signed more than 37 bills into law in his first 6 months in office.

Lessened Obamacare tax burdens via Executive Order

Rescinded Obama’s pro-transgender guidelines for schools receiving Federal Aid and that are subject to Title IX

Appointed Roger Severino, a strong defender of religious liberty, to the HHS Office of Civil Rights.

Had the Justice Department drop its discrimination lawsuit against North Carolina for its ‘bathroom bill’

Weakened the Johnson Amendment that hurt the freedom of speech of tax-exempt religious organizations.

Sent 20 ATF agents to Chicago to help the city fight gun violence. By June 2017 the local US Attorney said his office had already prosecuted more gun violence cases in 2017 than in the entire year 2016.

Signed into law a Congressional Review bill annulling a recent Obama Administration regulation that would have prohibited States from discriminating in awarding Title X family planning funds to local clinics that perform abortions.

Appointed Dr Charmaine Yoest, a strong pro-life advocate and the former president of Americans United For Life, to the position of Assistant Secretary of Public Affairs for the Department of Health and Human Services.

Changed the focus of the Obama Administration’s immigration policy from ‘Citizenship and Integration Program’ to ‘Citizenship and Assimilation Program’

Instructed Education Secretary Betsy DeVos to review Education regulations with the objective of returning power to the States.

Approved the Keystone Pipeline.

Removed the US from the Paris Climate Change Agreement.

Lifted the ban imposed by the Obama Administration on offshore drilling.

Reduced the National Debt by $102 Billion

Created more than 1 million new jobs, and unemployment is at 4.3%, a 16-year low

And the list goes on and on…

Trump has been able to accomplish all of this almost single-handedly. Can you imagine what he would be able to do if Republicans in Congress cooperated? Here establishment Republicans have a once in a lifetime opportunity to really Make America Great AGAIN and be remembered as the architects of a new era of freedom and prosperity. And what do they do? They CHICKEN OUT!

I have to admit I’ve never seen such coward people in my life. From the debacle of Repeal and Replace, to an uncertain future of Trump’s Tax Reform agenda, it’s been a while since I’ve seen people so unwilling to own the responsibility to govern. They don't belong in government.

So, not only is Trump fighting the Fake News Media and the sociopaths in the Democrat Party, but he’s absolutely alone in this fight.

Can you imagine if fellow Republicans in Congress actually supported Trump?

Can you imagine if the Media actually reported the real news?

Can you imagine where the stock market would go if all of this happened?

Can you imagine how much more investment America would attract as a result?

Can you imagine how many more jobs would be created with those investments?

Can you imagine how much more you’d be able to save?

Can you imagine?

My friend, we have a good man in the White House for a change. We have a CHRISTIAN in the White House, willing to give up his fortune, his golf, risking his life…

Is Trump really alone?

No - not really. God is with him. Whether or not God agrees with Trump's plans to make America great again, we shall see. Perhaps God’s plans are to destroy America – after all, this is only our temporary home. Perhaps He wants to grow us – our character, our righteousness. And perhaps, in order to do that, America has to be lost forever.

Or perhaps He wants our attention and to make sure that we turn to Him again.

We shall see…God is in control.

All I know is I trust Jesus. His plans are better than ours.

Jeremiah 29:11“For I know the plans I have for you”, declares the Lord, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future”

On Thursday August 17th, 2017, a van rammed into a crowd of people in Barcelona which has killed 13 people and injured 50 others. This attack was merely one of two attacks happening within two days with the same device: a vehicle, in Spain. The other was a similar attack in Cambrils, though this one was perpetrated by 5 people who have been killed by the local law enforcement.

And even though this is a clear terrorist attack, which ISIS has already claimed responsibility for, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer attempted to make a comparison to the Charlottesville driver that killed one and injured a dozen others with his vehicle, saying that it might be a ‘copycat’ attack of what happened in Charlottesville.

CNN national security correspondent Jim Sciutto began with: “In light of the uproar of the last several days, five days apart you have a white supremacist in Charlottesville use a vehicle to kill, and here you have attackers at least following the modus operandi of terrorists using vehicles apparently to kill as well, and those shared tactics that should be alarming.”

To which Blitzer responded with: “There will be questions about copycats. There will be questions if what happened in Barcelona was at all a copycat version of what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia. Even though there may be different characters, different political ambitions, they used the same killing device: a vehicle going at high speed into a group, a large group of pedestrians.”

Oh, sure, ignore the fact that terrorists have been using vehicles to run into crowds of people for years now. No, “THIS is nothing but a copycat attack, influenced by the white supremacist in Charlottesville, and therefore, influenced by Donald Trump!” Give me a break. Let’s not forget that a terrorist in Nice, France killed 84 people with a truck.

This attack has absolutely nothing to do with Charlottesville, but the media wants to draw comparisons to keep the story fresh in people’s minds. The media wants to remind everyone of what happened that last Saturday and the wave of emotions they felt over that weekend at the beginning of the week. They want to keep that story going, because that’s a story that they think will help them win in 2018 and 2020.

Charlottesville has reignited the fire within Antifa and BLM. For a long time now, there hasn’t been a white police officer killing an “innocent” black kid. And BLM has had little to do. But this Charlottesville protest was just what the Left needed to reignite the flame within those Leftist groups to fight Donald Trump, whom has nothing to do with white supremacists or the KKK.

Over the past few days, we’ve seen statue after statue being vandalized and illegally torn down. Even LINCOLN’s statues in Chicago and D.C. have been vandalized. The statue of the very man that FREED THE SLAVES has been vandalized by people who clearly don’t know their history.

These kinds of things are great for the Left. They see riots and incivility and they will quickly blame Trump for it, even though they are initiated by the Left. From Ferguson, to Berkeley to Charlottesville, the violence of these riots are all on the Left. Let’s not forget that the police in Charlottesville were ORDERED to stand down. The violence at Charlottesville is entirely on the Left.

And they are proud of it. They incited the violence there and are trying to put the blame on Trump. And the worst part it is: it’s succeeding… to an extent. I know what the Left is about and I place the blame on them for what happened in Charlottesville. After all, THERE WAS ONLY ONE SIDE THERE! So I won’t be convinced by anyone that Trump is racist or incites racists. But there are a lot of people out there that let others tell them what to think and believe.

Let me remind you of something Mika Brzezinski said: “[Trump] is trying to undermine the media… he could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think. And that is our job.” She publicly admitted that the media’s job is to control what people think. And they are capable of doing just that. Not with everyone, but with a lot of people for sure.

They are able to place the blame of Charlottesville on Trump and their mindless followers gladly eat up what they say. And so, when they see Wolf Blitzer trying to draw comparisons between Barcelona and Charlottesville, many in his audience will believe what he’s saying. That the terrorists in Barcelona were influenced by the events in Charlottesville.

Even though terrorists have been using vehicles FOR YEARS, the media will attempt to ignore that fact and try to bring people’s attention back into Charlottesville. Because they don’t frankly care about what happens in the world. About what ISIS carries out. No - their main objective is to destroy Trump. And in a story where the main focus should be the atrocities that happened in Barcelona over the past couple of days, Wolf Blitzer made it known that he couldn’t care less about it and simply wanted to return the focus to Charlottesville to further blame Trump.

It’s completely ridiculous to draw a comparison between what happened in Charlottesville and Barcelona. The only thing they have in common is that both events had something to do with a vehicle. But the Left just wants people to still be angry with Trump.

George Washington had it right when he said: “If the freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” Every day, the Left wants to take away freedom of speech from conservatives. It’s their objective to control people’s thoughts and beliefs. Mika thinks that the media is, or at least it should be, in control of people’s thoughts. And people like Trump stand clear in the way of the Left’s objectives.

They want to destroy Trump so that they can get one step closer to their true goal: complete destruction of the United States of America as founded and rebuild it as an authoritarian socialist state. But for as long as there are people like you and me, people who are willing to fight for our country and defeat the Left at every turn, they won't succeed. The Left foolishly believes they are in the majority. That most people think the way they do. But for the last half a year, with the 2016 presidential election and the following special elections in key states, we’ve shown them that support for the President is not at 34%, as they report.

And the more the Left attacks the President; the bigger their efforts become to illegally take him out of office, the stronger our support for him gets. The riot in Charlottesville was nothing but a showcase of the Left’s hateful history (with the KKK and neo-Nazis) and their hateful present (with BLM and Antifa). And for as long as we can recognize and expose the Left for the evil and hateful people that they truly are, I doubt they will have much luck in future elections.

John 3:20“Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed.”

With the recent events in Charlottesville, we've seen the latest protest by the KKK and neo-Nazis in the United States. And the Left is quick to lie to the world and claim that they are against the KKK and that these racists are all Trump supporters and Right-wing Republicans.

However, did you know that it was the DEMOCRATS who founded the Ku Klux Klan? Did you know that their objective back then was no different from their objective now: to KILL freedom, and anyone who defends it JUST to expand THEIR POWER? You know what the KKK is about. Why would they conspire to kill ANYONE, as history has shown us, unless their ultimate motive was YOUR subjugation? 'Do as I say, or else...'

In its website the Democrat National Convention (DNC) says ‘for decades, Democrats have stood with the African American community in the struggle for equality’…This, my dear friend, is unfortunately not true. The fact of the matter is that Democrats for more than150 YEARS have KILLED and ENSLAVED African Americans!

Let's take a look at some of the facts:

The Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1865 by DEMOCRATS who were desperate to regain control in the South. REPUBLICAN President Abraham Lincoln had been fighting to end slavery and naturally AFRICAN AMERICANS WERE 100% REPUBLICAN back then. The South had been Democrat – the Confederacy was DEMOCRAT – and it was RACIST for as long as it was DEMOCRAT.

The KKK was founded to KILL REPUBLICANS so that Democrats could regain control – they figured killing African Americans was the surest way to kill Republicans. And they were right. If they killed white people, they risked killing Democrats. They wanted to kill Republicans and the most effective way to accomplish that was by killing African Americans. In other words, the KKK was a TERRORIST organization FOUNDED BY THE DEMOCRATS.

Nathan Bedford Forrest was a Lieutenant General in the Confederate Army during the American Civil War. He was a leading Southern advocate in the post-war years. He was a pledged delegate from Tennessee to the New York Democratic National Convention of 4 July 1868. He served as the first Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.

Bedford said: ‘I’m not the enemy of the Negro. We want him here among us; he’s the only laboring class we have’

DEMOCRAT US Senator Robert Byrd was a RECRUITER for the Klan in his 20s and 30s, rising to the title of Kleagle and Exalted Cyclops of his local chapter. In 1946 he wrote a letter to the Klan’s Imperial Wizard, stating ‘The Klan is needed today as never before and I’m anxious to see its rebirth in West Virginia’. As recently as 2001 Democrat Senator Byrd repeatedly used the phrase ‘white Negroes’ on national television.

Former President Bill Clinton said of Sen. Robert Byrd: ‘He once had a fleeting association with the Ku Klux Klan, what does that mean? I'll tell you what it means. He was a country boy from the hills and hollows from West Virginia. He was trying to get elected. And maybe he did something he shouldn't have done and he spent the rest of his life making it up. And that's what a good person does. There are no perfect people. There are certainly no perfect politicians’ , he added.​

Here are some prominent KKK Democrats:

​Democrat US Senator Robert Byrd voted against both African American Supreme Court Nominees (one Democrat, one Republican) and filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Democrat Senator Theodore Bilbo revealed his membership to the Klan in a radio interview. He said ‘No man can leave the Klan. He takes an oath not to do that. Once a Ku Klux, always a Ku Klux’... so the next time you hear someone say that Byrd USED to be in the KKK and regretted having been a part of it, use that quote.

Democrat Governor Clifford Walker of Georgia revealed membership to the Klan in 1924

Democrats have been lying to the people of the United States for over 150 years. They’ve used minorities to advance their own political ambitions.

Democrats have MASSACRED African Americans, becoming the first home grown TERRORIST GROUP, the KKK.

And the recent tearing down of Confederate statues is nothing more than the Left's attempt at trying to bury their history. Because for as long as those statues are up, they will serve as a cruel reminder to them that they have a horrid history of hatred and racism coursing through their Democrat veins. And they can't let the truth be known by ANYONE.

You must NOT believe a word that comes out of their mouths…beware of false prophets…

Matthew 7:15 ‘Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.’

Last Thursday, I wrote an article about the MSM telling us that Trump’s base is crumbling and his approval rating is down the drain. Today, on the other hand, we see the Washington Examiner showing us that Trump’s approval ratings have surged to 45% overall. Just last week, a CNN poll had him at 38% approval and an IBD (Investor’s Business Daily) poll had him at 32%. Those last two numbers were posted on the Washington Post on Tuesday, August 8th. And do you want to know what’s funny? The Washington Examiner’s article WAS POSTED ON THE SAME DAY!

It’s a literal 7 point difference between the 38% that CNN gives and the 45% that the Zogby Analytics survey (the Washington Examiner poll) gives. And it’s a 13 point difference between IBD and Zogby. I’ve already said that, given the fact that CNN’s poll and IBD’s poll are so far apart, something must give. There’s no way that they are both right. Now, we find ample more evidence, given that Zogby’s poll shows Trump’s approval at 45%! There’s no possible way they are all simultaneously right. And given the fact that 32% is insanely unrealistic and that CNN hates Trump with a passion, I doubt either of them is telling the truth. Zogby analytics might be closer to the truth on the matter.

The Washington Examiner writes: “President Trump is the new ‘comeback kid’, with his approval rating in a new national poll rebounding after a freefall” and proceeds to show a tweet by the President saying: “Trump approval rebounds to 45%, surges among Hispanics, union homes, men.” And Zogby points out a few areas where Trump has improved. With Hispanics: “Trump saw one of the biggest improvements among any subgroup with Hispanics; his approval increased 11 percent to 42 percent approval versus 55 percent who disapprove of Trump’s job as president.”

Now that has got to hurt liberals. How could Hispanics of all people begin to be more approving of Trump? You see, in their minds, the Left thinks they own the minority vote. That Hispanics should always be voting Democrat. That there’s no way that Trump, with his hateful, bigoted rhetoric could draw in any Hispanics on his side. The Left thinks they own Hispanics. I don’t blame them for thinking that. After all, they used to own black people, fought, killed and died to own black people and now they also think they own Hispanics. They still want to own people, even if they can’t flat out call them slaves.

Owning the Hispanic vote is a way to own… well… Hispanics. They don’t think that any Republican, particularly Trump of all people, should ever have even a single Hispanic person favor him. That’s the Leftist mentality. They want to OWN people.

Next, the poll shows a surge in Union households: “Trump’s numbers also increased significantly among union voters from 43 percent approval to 51 percent approval in August.” HOLY MOLY! 51%?! Now THAT has got to hurt liberals. As much as that Hispanics poll must hurt them, this must hurt them even more. UNIONS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE DEMOCRAT!

Unions are a union of workers that, for the most part, seek fair treatment and wages from managers and companies. Unless you’re a teacher’s union, in which you seek insanely high wages for the same amount of work you already do, which already doesn’t help anyone you teach. *ahem* Chicago’s teacher’s union *ahem*.

But seriously, union voters are typically Democrat-leaning, so to see polls that show those kinds of numbers for union voters is quite interesting.

Back to the poll, among weekly Walmart shoppers,55% approve while 43% disapprove. Unfortunately, this will be the subject of ridicule coming from the Left, since they are so hateful that they will call these people “hillbillies” and “hicks”. To them, “hillbillies” are insanely ignorant, so when they see these numbers, they won’t be surprised and will simply say: “Well of course those hillbilly ignoramuses largely like Trump.” I hope you read that with a snobby tone of voice. That’s how I wrote it.

Among married voters, 53% approve versus 43% who disapprove. Well, I’m not really surprised by this one either. Trump is a family man who puts God, family and country first. That typically resonates with married people who mostly hope to start a family (or already have one). That’s typical, everyday America, for the most part.

These numbers are the complete opposite of what the MSM typically shows us. These numbers are the complete opposite of what the MSM thinks is the case. But these numbers are most likely closer to the truth than what CNN and other MSM sources will show us. Most people chose Trump over Hillary. And those same people are very happy with their choice for President. I’ve yet to meet a single Trump voter that regrets his or her decision. But I’ve met plenty of former Obama voters who regretted voting for him and decided to vote for Trump in 2016.

Point is: the MSM is fake news and most of the country is happy that Trump is President. Don’t get me wrong. I still see plenty of people on social media who are brainwashed liberals who hate Trump with a passion. But for the most part, they are in the minority. They may be loud, but there aren’t as many of them as they want you to believe.

John 8:32“and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”