I wouldn't say interesting, if anything this article could have been written with about 40-50 words, alas his narrow conclusion.
However he doesn't get what the iPhone really is and probably never will.

I hate the misuse of homophones, but don't confuse ignorance with apathy.

Click to expand...

Totally misses it, especially his analysis of what is or is not a smartphone.
Do running applications natively on a phone contitute it a smartphone. hardly.

am not sure what to call the iphone, except may a newton for the 21st century, or the first generation of a device resembling a star trek data PADD.

Interesting note, if you've read the sttng tech manual , the PADD has some native applications but is meant to work in a teathered mode when aboard the starship, tying by photonic interface, to the library computer.

The site that wrote that review is not a English site, it just has a english version. If you go to http://www.mobile-review.com/ you will see its in some other language until you click the English button at the top. Also note that at the end of the URL it says -en.shtml, the -en meaning thats the English version.

MacRumors attracts a broad audience
of both consumers and professionals interested in
the latest technologies and products. We also boast an active community focused on
purchasing decisions and technical aspects of the iPhone, iPod, iPad, and Mac platforms.