The meridian line would put the majority of the oil reserves in Scottish waters, 88% i believe and the majority of gas in English waters. This in effect would bankrupt England, do you believe that this will happen?

The maritime border was redrawn by the UK government some years ago, it doesn't follow a meridian.

Quote:

Documents detailing secret government plans in the 1970s to prevent Scotland laying claim to North Sea oil have been seen by The Times. They show the extraordinary lengths to which civil servants were prepared to go to head off devolution, which was seen then as inevitably leading to independence.

Treasury officials also advised that the boundaries of Scotland’s coastal waters should be redrawn and a new sector created to “neutralise” Scotland’s claim to North Sea oil – a step that was taken.

The “step that was taken” was the Scottish Adjacent Waters Boundaries Order 1999, which illegally moved Scotland’s North Sea border to the north, thereby transferring some 6,255 statute square miles (5,540 nautical square miles) of Scottish waters to English jurisdiction (see Figure 5). Besides being a clear violation of the Treaty and Acts of Union, this transfer has a direct deleterious effect on the finances of the Government of Scotland in that no taxes or licence fees derived from activities in the illegally transferred area are credited to Scotland in the periodic Government Expenditures and Revenues Scotland (GERS) reports.

And I totally support the Southern States independence from the oppressive Northern Yankee USA too!

FREEDOM, from Northen Yankee Aggression!

Long Live the Southern Confederate States of America!

Free The South!

FREEDOM!!!!

YeeeeeeeeeeeeeHhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Actally, this is so much fun. I can understand how people get off on it so much.

I'm a Yank and I agree with you 100%! The South had very effectively modeled the idea of state sovereignty, via the viable option of states' secession. If it ain't working, why stay together?
Regarding Scotland, I guess I like the romantic idea of Scotland being part of the UK, but the same principle as above would apply here. That's also assuming that the separation is not going to make things worse for Scotland by isolating it from other White countries.

The UK has a long, proud history. Whites need to unite against their invaders, not worry about centuries old problems of wanting independence.

__________________

"Those worth saving can save themselves. So let them. The rest deserves to die anyhow. There is no use trying to save them."-Varg Vikernes

"Those of us who have been so much influenced by violence and particularly pornographic violence in the media are not inherent monsters. We are your sons and your husbands and we grew up in regular families and pornography can reach out and snatch anyone out of their house today."
-Ted Bundy

I'm a Yank and I agree with you 100%! The South had very effectively modeled the idea of state sovereignty, via the viable option of states' secession. If it ain't working, why stay together?

Regarding Scotland, I guess I like the romantic idea of Scotland being part of the UK, but the same principle as above would apply here. That's also assuming that the separation is not going to make things worse for Scotland by isolating it from other White countries.

"romantic idea"

I kinda like the "romantic idea" of a United States of America too.

Every one posting on this thread who is actually from the United Kingdom (including Scotland) is making it clear that this whole SNP independence thing is a sham. This fact must tell you somthing?

The UK has a long, proud history. Whites need to unite against their invaders, not worry about centuries old problems of wanting independence.

I do appreciate the pro-UK sentiment of your post, but this is not a centuries old problem. This is a modern problem created by the Anti-White marxist left.

The act of union was mutually agreed between Scotland and England during a time of peace between the two nations around 300 years ago. After centuries of division and warfare, it allowed Britain to hold it's against larger more powerful European countries.

I do appreciate the pro-UK sentiment of your post, but this is not a centuries old problem. This is a modern problem created by the Anti-White marxist left.

The act of union was mutually agreed between Scotland and England during a time of peace between the two nations around 300 years ago. After centuries of division and warfare, it allowed Britain to hold it's against larger more powerful European countries.

It wasn't mutually agreed at all. It was an agreement between English and Scottish aristocrats in the aftermath of the wretched darien scheme. The general public on either side was not given a say.

It wasn't mutually agreed at all. It was an agreement between English and Scottish aristocrats in the aftermath of the wretched darien scheme. The general public on either side was not given a say.

It was mutually agreed by the leaders of both nations. Back then, that was about as much say as the "general public" ever got anywhere. The Scottish people also had a say in a democratic vote on independence in the 1970's. And back then, the people voted to stay part of the union. And soon they will have a chance to have their say all over again!

This is a lot more 'say' than the "general public" of the Confederate Southern States have ever had.

And if you're Pro-White and Scottish, you don't need me to remind you of the true 'Multi-Culti' Anti-White nature of the SNP.

I was born in Scotland, went to school in Edinburgh just like my father before me. I support the union, but I won't cry too much if it breaks up. After all, Behind closed doors much worse things have already happened.

If Scotland was to become "independent"* then I believe that would, ironically, go some way to strengthening Scotland-England relations, as the plethora of Scottish Labour MPs voting on English-only issues in Westminster would be gone. So too, would the anomaly of Scottish and non-UK European students who study at Scottish university having their tuition fees paid for them, but English students having to pay them out of their own pocket.

Whether it happens or not, I think we can agree that issues such as the west lothian question, as well as the cultural differences between the UK's constituent nations, are gleefully exaggerated by the ZOG in order to distract the braindead proles from the altogether more substantive issues of the day.

* I use the word "independent" very delicately, in the same context that Salmond and his party use it. No nation is truly independent. The majority of the western "developed" nations are slaves to Israel.