Some may not like this report and
may even trot out some "experts" trying to convince you of its insignificance
and how wrong I am but I'll tell you right up front that I believe this report
along with my discoveries of surface water in a liquid state and bio-life
on Mars in my 2012 combo Report
#221 as well as hidden immense artificial Moon objects in my 2004 Report
#067 and Report
#068 to be among the most fundamental and important that I've ever personally
made and reported on. Further, this report may be one of the biggest discoveries
from an insight point of view to come along so far in human history here on
Earth. That's just how important I believe this evidence to be in relation
to its potential.

Although some, if they have anything to say at all, may try to shift the impact
of this discovery over into the ridiculous and conspiracy theory trying to
manipulatively mitigate its impact, the evidence presented here tells us that
the past existence of at least one technologically very advanced civilization
well beyond our current level here on Earth is fact. Likewise not growing
up on this world all alone as previously thought has all kinds of implications
for Earth humanity and our beginnings.

So just what kind of evidence are we talking about? In a nutshell someone
very advanced has apparently since ancient times been routinely surface mining
this planet's ocean floors on an immense scale but in the deepest places that
we would normally regard as inaccessible ignoring the many difficulties of
working at such depths as though they were no problem at all.

There may also be those that will disagree with my identifying this evidence
as surface mining and point in another direction? Maybe but at this point
I'm satisfied that the evidence points directly at surface mining of metals
and/or chemical compounds on the sea floor and be forewarned that believing
otherwise is going to take some real convincing with me.

I discovered the basics of this some years ago but back then did not feel
that the visual evidence alone was sufficiently convincing for me to endure
the major onslaught of derision and misdirection that I knew to expect in
trying to keep the mainstream public, science, and academic communities ignorant
on this. I knew it would be enough of a job just trying to endure the inherent
incredulous reactions that even some normally independent thinkers might have.

Why? Well this type of evidence is strong and it's right here on Earth. That's
the problem, ITS RIGHT HERE ON EARTH. Such a reality means that it will hit
close to home in the mainstream Earth human psyche and therefore may as an
uncertainty fear reaction tend to slice through the psychological insulation
that usually comes with the mainstream being able to fall back on regarding
something ultimately as something distant on another world and/or open to
interpretation in order to feel that sense of being "safe" about
it.

For example, I usually know when my reporting is getting a little too close
to home and too real with some folks when it is met with very much wide spread
silence. Some of my Antarctica and Moon reporting was like that and so I backed
off it a little trying not to "beat a dead horse" as the saying
goes. Acceptance of truth will generally not come if it is pushed too much
and perceived as carrying within it too much of the unknown. Then it appears
to be perceived as threatening.

What you're going to see here is the visually distinct trackevidence of immense often up to 5-mile wide machines
that I believe are combination surface mining dredges and processing plants
operating in Earth deepest ocean depths typical of 3,000+ meters or 9,842+
feet to over 6,000+ meters or 19,685+ feet depths. The tracks traverse over
huge cracks, up and down cliffs and mountains without course deviations (in
straight lines) for hundreds or even thousands of miles as though none of
these were obstacles worthy of concern at all. Now that's advanced technology
and, if nothing else, that alone must be taken very seriously.

The most telling type of evidence that convinced me to report on this now
is on the occasion when these gigantic rigs do make purposeful physical changes
in direction of travel including 90º turns, U-turns, pivot turns, angle
turns, jockeying back and forth over older tracks, etc. That evidence demonstrates
that these rigs are in fact physical constructs deep down on the sea floor
and under intelligent control by "someone" rather than imaging or
processing false artifacts.

The most telling and convincing of this evidence is near
the island of Saipan
in the Pacific on elevated ridges tops that are still very deep down
but also even deeper down as much as 21,000+ feet in the bottom of the super
deep Mariana Trench system itself. Present are multiple examples of these
immense mobile mines making multiple course corrections including tracks superimposed
upon earlier tracks providing the needed proof of intelligent purposeful control
and that they are real and not imaging or processing artifacts.

Maybe I've just gotten used to it but to me the evidence isn't so startling
in of itself. After all it's just tracks but rather it's the implications
and scale that may be a bit disturbing to some. It suggests factually that
someone technologically advanced far beyond current Earth human standards
has been present here on Earth in at least ancient times with the opportunity
to (if they chose) influence human development as many of Earth's civilization
legends and "myths" tell us. The list of implications just goes
on and on but this report is not the place for all that. This report's purpose
is just to basically introduce you to this reality.

Now take a look at the images below to establish the location of the main
Saipan and Mariana Trench system evidence site concentrated on here. You should
know that the whole site primarily being examined here
is some 624 km or 388 miles long. It's
just too big to show anything more than partial sample images of it in this
brief type of reporting style but I'll try to cover what I believe to be the
better key features offering the most insight that I think you should at least
initially be aware of.

The above 1st
image should help generally locate the main Saipan site on the world
globe and the 2nd image zooming in a bit on it
should help more specifically locate this site on the undersea Lapulapu Ridge
in the Mariana Trench area and demonstrate what bottom formation shapes to
look for. As you can see even at this still wide-angle distance, the strange
formations are very organized, appear to be too geometric to be natural, and
the distance length this discovery site encompasses at 388 miles length gives
you an idea of the tremendous scale involved.

Once you know what to look for via this reporting, you should know that this
site shows evidence of having been previously mined. Very close inspection
suggests that the older and newer evidence is often mixed up together tending
to generate some visual confusion as to which is which. However, we're not
going to get into an analysis of that here. In this reporting we'll try to
stick to the more obvious evidence.

Even so and as you might anticipate, most of this mining likely occurred in
ancient times and there are many questions of course that satellite imaging
cannot be expected to answer. For example, how ancient and does any of this
evidence predate human presence on this planet?

The above 3rd
and 4th images are of the south western end of this 388 mile long evidence
site. It is located just off the island of Saipan and most of it is on the
top of an undersea elevated ridge that is part of the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) which following World War II has been an unincorporated
territory of the United States. Note that the water depth even on this ridge
top where most of this evidence is located is still plenty deep averaging
about 3500–4500 meters or 11,483–14,464 feet.

DARKNESS: Remember that most of the visible
light spectrum is absorbed within 10 meters or 33 feet of the water's surface
and almost no sunlight penetrates below 150 meters or 490 feet of water depth,
even when the water is very clear. So beyond 500 feet depth it is as dark
as the inside of a cave and natural visual sight for we Earth humans ceases
to be of benefit. We must then rely on electronic devices and their representations
for navigation purposes. Yet these mines appear to navigate great distances
in the deep's black dark in straight lines on the sea floor without any problems.
This suggests physiology different than humans and/or prior scout precise
pre-navigation course mapping. That alone is a considerable technological
achievement.

PRESSURE: At sea level, the air presses down
on our bodies at 14.7 pounds per square inch (1 bar). We don't feel it because
the fluids in our bodies is pushing outward with the same force. However,
dive down into the ocean even a few feet beyond that and a noticeable change
occurs. For example, one can feel an increase of pressure on one's eardrums.
This is due to an increase in hydrostatic pressure, the force per unit area
exerted by a liquid on an object. The deeper you go under the sea, the greater
the pressure of the water pushing down on you. For every 10 meters or 33 feet
one goes down, the pressure increases by 14.7 psi (1 bar). In the deepest
ocean, the tremendous pressure is equivalent to the weight of an elephant
balanced on a postage stamp or the equivalent of one person trying to support
50 jumbo jets! Imagine the pressure at 21,000 feet and yet these massive mines
appear to operate well at that depth and pay no attention to it.

As you can see the tracks off of Saipan are huge. Each path's scale probably
represents 5 miles across. The island of Saipan is known to be about 5.6–5.8
miles wide and compared to that the surface mine path is likely 5 miles across
and this does parallel Google Earth stats. It appears as though this particular
mobile mine in this location sucks up sediment and debris, grinds it up, and
deposits most of the tailings back down in place in the track appearing as
many very uniform horizontal bar lengths like closely spaced crossties in
a railroad bed but keep in mind the 5-mile width and scale involved.

The above 5th
image demonstrates an interesting side point. Close inspection reveals
that there is visual evidence here suggesting that a mine may have crossed
in a straight line over the mid area of the island of Saipan likely in ancient
times and likely its great weight crushed that crossing area down forming
a shallow tidal gap between the west and east island portions. The east portion
is the island of "Saipan" and the west portion is "Tipian."

What isn't as readily apparent in this less detailed more distant image is
that the mining activity has also been active on the left or west side of
the ridge Saipan is on as well. Now a massive mine would not likely have shown
itself out of the water in the crossing during a time when the island was
inhabited by humans who would have certainly passed such a strange and unusual
"monster" event down into their legends even if scientists in later
times would have blown such a witnessing off as impossible and just primitive
fanciful imagination.

In other words, even though this mining site is very pronounced mine track
evidence wise, unless there is an island record of this event, it is still
something that likely happened in ancient or even prehistoric times either
before human presence on the island or perhaps before human presence of any
kind on Earth and therefore before human recorded history. Human presence
on Saipan is thought to have started around 2000 BC.

In the above 6th
image note that the mine has also traversed over the length of a very
large crack system running along its track direction of travel apparently
paying little attention to it as an obstacle but vacuuming out any sediment
in the crack's interior. This is an example of what really large scale 5-mile
wide size can do when it comes to what you and I might might regard as obstacles.

Note also in the very upper portion of this #6 image as well as the #2 image
how this monster mine path at this point changed direction to the left at
a shallow angle without a doubt to stay generally centered on the top of the
ridge. The point is that, although these rigs normally travel in very ridged
straight lines, they are maneuverable despite their great size and under intelligent
navigation control by "someone" anticipating despite the blackness
of the 12,700+ feet depth that to continue in a straight line on this ridge
would not work out well and that preemptive steering correction is required.

The above
7th image is from the mid area of this 388 mile long evidence site.
At this location a mine has made a number of 90º turns with the tracks
forming a box shape and which overlaps and blurred previous tracks that have
done the same thing in this same spot. The purpose is likely to make adjustments
in its direction of travel but perhaps to also temporarily get out of the
way and avoid the passage of another surface mine working the same site. It
at the very least demonstrates that this visual evidence is something real
and physical on the sea floor and not false imaging or processing artifacts.

I am sorry that I can show you only representative samples of some of this
evidence but that's all this type of reporting on the Internet can practically
handle. Some would no doubt try to convince me to make needed money on this
discovery by hoarding it for a future book as many would likely do. However,
as I write this I'm nearly 70 and might be gone sooner than later and the
public needs to know about this evidence NOW
without being agenda driven and from the source who first discovered it and
who probably has put the most thought into it up to this point.

There are also other points to be made. All of the mine turn evidence and
tracking back on top of previously made tracks activity collectively makes
it increasingly harder and harder to convince others that I am a poor misguided
incompetent fool confused about what constitutes imaging or processing artifacts
or long straight fissures or fractures or volcanic folds on the sea floor.

Further, this evidence is in Google Earth, a private company. Although it
is suppose to be drawn from satellite imaging that is suppose to be in the
official record, it really isn't an official record itself and what is in
a private program like this can be altered and/or degraded to fit secrecy
perceived needs. Remember, the Moon Clementine mission data was a direct official
record and yet it was eventually years later thoroughly sanitized as per my
Report
180 by the Navy and basically eliminated all of the significant anomaly
evidence in it.

The US Navy claimed early on that the data set was in need of correction of
its faults and thereby needed "improvement." You believe that don't
you? Further, the subsequent improvements happened years later over no objections
by NASA or a public trained to be apathetic about such matters. Remember,
the Navy's secrecy driven definition of what constitutes a "fault"
in the data is without a doubt considerably different than what you and I
in the public would regard as a fault.

That this can also happen in Google Earth should come as no surprise. In fact,
take my 2010 Report
#189 on undersea ruins west in the Atlantic off of Gibraltar where I speculated
about an Atlantis connection. Since my initial report a subsequent revision
of Google Earth didn't completely eliminate the evidence but it did substantially
degrade it visually. Anticipate that once my reporting here has revealed this
mine track evidence and what to look for, a "revision" may likely
be forthcoming in Google Earth.

The above 8th, 9th and 10th images
are samples taken from the upper or northern portion of this 388 mile long
evidence site. The evidence in the upper mid and left of Image
#8 demonstrates various reorientations of a mine's direction of travel.
Note especially the considerable overlapping tracks in a relatively short
space as a mine jockied back and forth on a terrain elevation slope.

In the above 9th image, a mine makes a decision
to go down the 10,000 foot ridge slope and out to sample test mine the Mariana
Trench floor system as deep as 21,260 feet further beyond or it is parking
out of the way waiting on another mine to pass and do so. Apparently the foray
testing the Mariana Trench floor likely did not produce what it was looking
for there because it turned around and came back and up the cliff wall without
further ado leaving only its tracks as a silent record of its passage.

The above 10th image provides a closer view of
the mine's turn around on the Mariana Trench floor. Note that there is a dividing
line down the center middle of the mine pristine tracks typical of its design.
This indicates that half of the mine's bottom business end width is likely
independent of the other half and this is further confirmed by the 90º
turn evidence as the inside side gives way to the outside turn side in the
track evidence. It appears that the mine when fully in operation as a mine
sucking and grinding acts as a giant nozzle on the sea floor like a monster
vacuum cleaner sucking onto the ground and it can release suction to traverse
across sensitive areas if it chooses creating a smaller less obvious mine
track.

The mine may be a gigantic single object but, if it is manned by organic beings
and not entirely robotic, I would not be surprised to learn that it is an
at least a two piece affair. The bottom would be doing the mining and processing
while the upper unit, if not serving entirely as a fully implemented remote
control, is connected to the lower unit by a flexible assembly and provides
navigation, control, storage, and perhaps even living quarters. Any speculation
along those lines would of course be dependent on just how technologically
advanced these people really are and what conventions they may employ at home
where they came from in problem solving,

In my research, it appears these surface mines traverse the sea floor most
of the time in very straight lines that can extend for hundreds and even thousands
of miles without making many or any steering corrections for what you and
I might regard as obstacles. They tend to just traverse right over most obstacles
rather than avoid them. Of course some or most of this may be a function of
thorough scouting from different vehicles and precise navigation map programming
to mitigate such problems before a trip is even started.

You should know that there are also likely mines with
differences as revealed by their tracks. The most prevalent evidence are mines
that may just suck up the bottom finer material exposing the underlying rock
strata and blow a lot of the processed material off to the side where it settles
in smooth banks but also leaving very rough and very irregular coarse material
in the tracks. This evidence may represent older technology and its design
blowing material tends to visually foul any previous adjacent tracks making
it easy to mistake them for older imprints.

Then there are mines that not only suck but also grind off rock upper surfaces
depositing the finer processed material more neatly back into the tracks just
made with a lot less blown off to the side. These are characterized by their
deposits being fairly uniform but also still just a bit coarse and irregular.

The visuals of this are compromised by sediment settling back into the tracks
obscuring them over time. If this observation is accurate, this tends to suggest
that a lot of this type of mining has occurred really far back in time and
over a great deal of accumulated time. Further, when the track evidence tends
to become more obscured presenting a smoother surface, the wave or vegetation
mimicking image tampering seems to then be able to dominate more in its applications
further obscuring the evidence. Only when the tracks are very organized and
regular do they tend to dominate over the tampering applications.

Then there are the mines like that at the Saipan evidence site. They also
suck and grind but the deposited material that goes back into their tracks
is very uniform with hardly any blown sediment building up out to the sides
of their path. Of course I can't know for sure but suspect that these are
newer and more recent mine designs. If true, this again suggests the passage
of time resulting in improved equipment designs and mining procedures.

The next three sample images below demonstrate some of the differences in
the surface mine tracks. In this case, they are likely exploratory mines traveling
in long straight lines demonstrating the reality that other sites do exist.
If I ever get a chance to do a book on this evidence, I'll try to include
more such images as well as of large areas that were apparently concentrations
surface mined clean but for now consider this report in general as just a
basic introduction to the existence of this type of evidence.

The above 11th, 12th, and 13th
images represent different evidence sites not associated with those at Saipan.
They are just a few of the more unique samples of what my older research discovered
demonstrating the difference in tracks and thereby the mines.

The 11th image shows a straight line of mine
tracks of the suck and grind variety that deposits fairly uniform processed
material formations back in the tracks. Note that the deposits are still just
a bit irregular and that settling sediment has partially covered the center
areas of the tracks. This evidence is in 16,000+ feet of water and located
1,683 km or 1,046 miles south of Hawaii in the Pacific.

The 12th image demonstrates two different track
systems meeting. The lower one is similar to the Saipan very uniform suck
and grind evidence while the upper one is more like the more prevalent suck
and blow evidence throwing processed material in banks off to the side leaving
exposed very rough coarse material in the tracks. This evidence is in 9,000+
feet of water and located 887 km or 551 miles southwest
of Guam in the Pacific.

The 13th image demonstrates mine track evidence
of the suck and neatly deposit in the tracks kind but much neater in its formations.
It may actually be two different mines with one going over the track of the
other. Further, although it strains credulity, it could be possible that both
mines are actually present in this image even though one can't be sure of
this. This evidence is in 18,000+ feet of water and about 757
km or 470 miles directly east of Bermuda in the open Atlantic.

Where the mining activity has detected larger concentrations of what ever
it is they are looking for, broader areas of the sea floor there have been
vacuumed clean leaving only the underlying irregular processed deposits and/or
rock strata visible in the imaging. All of the evidence clearly points to
surface mining only and what can be relatively easily vacuumed up through
this type of automation and on a large scale. Further, the visual track evidence
suggests that this kind of activity may have been going on for a long time
stretching back into antiquity as the sites are gradually covered over by
drifting sediments over time.

One cannot contemplate this kind of mining evidence without also considering
what Zecharia Sitchin interpreted in the ancient Sumarian cuneiform stone
tablet writings about the planet Nibiru and its Anunnaki population. Remember
that Sitchin's Anunnaki here in this Solar System were all suppose to be primarily
focused on recovering gold essential to supporting Nibiru's atmosphere while
it is in deep space. In fact, after a rebellion by part of the Anunnaki against
their leaders over what they perceived to be their own poor gold mining working
conditions, the modern human race is supposed to have been genetically engineered
into existence by Anunnaki leaders to take the Anunnaki's place and work as
slaves in the land based gold mines.

Even if any of this Sumarian writing has any basis in fact, that record likely
represents only what Anunnaki leaders on the war's winning side were comfortable
with human assistants knowing which may not all be truth and then humans may
have gotten it garbled as well. Still, could that be what these mobile surface
mines have been doing on Earth's ocean floors, mining gold for different Anunnaki
Earth factions perhaps even without human knowledge of it? Could it be that
on land gold mines may have been only a tiny part of the whole truth?

Likewise could the development of these undersea traveling mines that suck
and grind and deposit the processed tailings neatly back in the mine tracks
in a very organized fashion be a more recent development in an attempt to
keep humanity unaware of this activity that blowing plumes of sediment might
chance revealing? Could some of the Anunnaki or some other not be passively
waiting Nibiru's return but still be here settled in and genetically engineering
their own merging into Earth humanity? Could they be genetically hidden among
us in plain sight like diamonds hidden among glass beads in a fish tank?

Just who owned, designed, and operated these great undersea mining machines?
The Anunnaki or someone else? Obviously it is someone very technologically
advanced to deal with the considerable problems that present themselves at
19,000–21,000 feet undersea depths. However, we need to remember that
such a capability does not necessarily equate to ethical superiority or reasoning
ability either.

Think about it. What if who ever designed and built these great machines did
leave Earth but also left some of the mines behind intact on the sea floor.
Obviously who ever finds one and is able to access it is potentially in for
a huge jump forward in technological advantage. Right now China, Twain, and
Japan are in heated exchanges over undersea territories extending out from
tiny spits of land (islands) that could in theory give them exclusive access
to great undersea areas such as covered in my Report 223. Does the real reason
beneath the surface have to do with this as I poorly tried to convey in that
report in advance of the information I'm revealing here?

If so, in our possibly manipulated bias to believe that we are alone here
on Earth, could crop circles be very sophisticated communications directed
at someone else here on Earth and not at we humans at all? A form of silent
pictogram encryption sent across deep space and possibly time itself? Could
it be that a large part of the UFO activity all around this planet is the
byproduct of a fascination by others with this state of unique Earth human
duality and denial and how it is enabled and maintained here? Are we nothing
more than ongoing experiments caught in the distraction of a psychological
maze of someone else's making to be bent to someone else's will? If so, it
would certainly explain a lot.

For example, might this explain why the mainstream is collectively unable
to take contrary but yet verifiable evidence seriously enough to demand independent
investigation of it while at the same time accepting the false manipulated
information we're so often fed just because recognized leaders endorsed it?
Are we being misdirected and have we always been so at the genetic coded level
to concentrate on the mundane (example: social media) and accept secrecy and
formless outside control as normal with a built in hair trigger in favor of
extreme emotion, violence and war as a disabling distraction should we begin
to understand our subtle chains a little too much?

Are we just now beginning to notice at long last the residual marks of the
presence of others to whom we may owe a great deal including perhaps the good
of our very existence but also the bad of long exploitation? What do you think?

In theory this type of undersea evidence could be a great boon in eventually
throwing off mind control shackles, if they exist, simply because the clues
are something physical on the bottom of our oceans and thereby verifiable
as fact. However, who does one get to do the verification that one can trust?
NASA, NOAA. Navy, DOD, NSA, etc?

The truth is that the DOD, Navy, intelligence services, etc. have their hands
in all of the advancing technology necessary to explore Earth's oceans deeps
as well as space. If you will remember, prior to the time of satellites going
to the planets, independent telescopes on Earth saw green seasonally advancing
and retreating at the poles on Mars and that was speculated to be water and
vegetation. However, once satellites came into the picture and with them NASA
and JPL's more complete control of the information flow, Mars became perceived
as a deadly cold bone dry desolate world devoid of surface water and life
of any kind. So the simple seasonal observation issue just quietly faded away.

After all, what scientist or group is going to argue with or worse expose
the great employers and social benefactors NASA and JPL or their cooperative
entities or the government agencies that support them? Too big and untouchable
to fail or suffer a major blow to credibility you say? The public needs to
have heroes and confidence in them you say? Does that go as far as accepting
partial truths or falsehoods wholesale without question? Do you really think
that we can trust the same people and their associated industries to explore
these undersea evidence sites reported on here to deliver us the truth and
especially the full truth?

For example, take my 2012 Commentary
#054 titled "The Bloop." It dabbles with some strands of evidence
that there may be an undersea race that has survived to the present on this
world 70% of which is covered by water and 90+% of that is essentially unexplored
so much so that an old saying has been developed suggesting that we know more
about the Moon than we do about our own oceans. If we ever came to the conclusion
that an unknown highly advanced race in ancient times may have had a hand
in our own development to mine gold on land for them, why then would we be
surprised to learn that this type of thing may have also extended to another
race developed to operate efficiently undersea on this primarily water world?

Further, why would it come as a surprise for us to learn that a military like
our Navy would do what ever was expedient to cover up a reality that Navy
use of new under water technology was harming not only sea creatures like
whales, etc. but also a race (aquatic humans?) that may share this planet
with us? My point being that finding someone both fair and objective without
agendas to investigate the mining activity reported on here is much more complicated
than one might originally think if real truth is the intended goal and not
a white wash.

Remember, least you forget, I do not make this evidence. I just report on
its presence along with my opinion as to its nature and that is my right as
discoverer. It is up to you to determine for yourself whether any thing here
has any merit or not. All that I can do is put the evidence in front of you
and hope that you will take it seriously and above all think for yourself
independently.