In a national address on June 14, 2016, Barack Hussein Obama evinced more ire directed at Donald Trump than toward the murderous jihadists who slaughtered 49 people and wounded many others in Orlando's Pulse Nightclub on June 12, 2016.

Note to all the dumbasses who say we cannot build bridges to the Muslim community, by profiling Muslims or by banning them until they can be properly identified and screened. It not not OUR job to build any damned bridges to anyone's community. It is THEIR job to build one to OURS. They came here, we didn't go there.

that's exactly right; Wouldn't it go FAR for muslims to speak out against the terror in meaningful numbers and march against it....it is NOT our job to build bridges, it is 110% THEIRS. And, they may be fearful..OK...but to most Americans that makes them look compliant. How can it not?

that's exactly right; Wouldn't it go FAR for muslims to speak out against the terror in meaningful numbers and march against it....it is NOT our job to build bridges, it is 110% THEIRS. And, they may be fearful..OK...but to most Americans that makes them look compliant. How can it not?

mar Mateen increasingly sought out Islamic State videos and other radical Islamist propaganda in the months leading up to his shooting rampage at an Orlando, Fla., gay nightclub Sunday, investigators have found.

A counter-terrorism official said investigators had uncovered the material while reviewing Mateen's Internet search history. Mateen, who was killed by a SWAT team, pledged allegiance to Islamic State during the attack.

As the inquiry into the Orlando nightclub shooting broadened Tuesday, with investigators ranging as far afield as Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia, survivors recounted the New York-born gunman – whose parents are Afghan immigrants – telling them he had gone on a killing rampage because he “wanted America to stop bombing his country.”...

More at the above link.

It might also be worth noting that LGBT Pride Month 2016 coincides with Ramadan 2016.

wait, that's all Ducky says after all that information in the post and comment? THAT? The master of the red herring; I've seen it and commented on it probably 100 times...you never let us down, Ducky. Next you'll be accusing AOW of being FT.

The most charitable interpretation we could put on our illustrious president's attitude and behavior towards "The Muslim Problem" would be to attribute to him an honest, earnest desire to do everything possible to defuse any sort of Mob Action against adherents to Islam by perpetually denying or whitewashing over the danger of blandly accepting their obvious character defects.

Obama doesn't want the country to erupt into a long series of lynchings and community-based persecutions of the evil sect.

After all, how many today remember –– or even know about –– the vicious, murderous treatment of MORMONS in the nineteenth century?

Despite our sainted Bill of Rights, non-conformists and groups who exhibit marked differences from the Common Herd in Belief, Behavior and Style have ALWAYS been subjected to rough treatment and often to outright persecution of the cruelest sort imaginable.

We must never forget what our not-so-distant ancestors did to Negroes and Jews –– AND the bigoted, highly discriminatory, ruthlessly exploitative treatment to which legitimate immigrants in the Great Wave of the late-19th and early-20th centuries were routinely subjected by "real" Americans. "No Irish Need Apply" is a handy example.

Every society, –– large or small, religious or secular ––, seems to need a "Common Enemy" to despise and maltreat.

Despite centuries of painfully acquired knowledge, brilliant invention, and much material progress, our human species still has within it a feral appetite, –– a bloodlust, if you will ––, to accuse, insult, taunt, browbeat, incarcerate, torture, and eventually KILL designated victims, who may –– or may not –– be perfectly innocent of any wrongdoing.

The degree to which this feral instinct is successfully suppressed is the measure of how truly civilized a particular group may be.

I think it safe to say that in the main "we" have evolved towards a more truly civilized approach to living and to governance than the misguided followers of the Mad Prophet Mohammed, but the partition that separates "us" from "them" is as fragile and thin as onionskin.

There is only ONE sensible solution to ALL forms of Islamic Aggression. and that is a UTILITARIAN solution –– a FINAL Solution:

DIDADIN

DetainIntern Disempower AndDeportIslamaniacsNow

D-I-D-A-D-I-N!

Those who would be kind to the cruel are sure to be cruel to the kind."

"Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."

~ Thomas Paine (1737-1809)

DIDADIN!

However illegal, impolitic, inadvisable, unconstitutional, un-American, immoral or impracticable others claim it to be we should maintain a position of absolute intolerance for a Muslim Presence in OUR world.

When the Handwriting on the Wall sends a clear, uncompromising message, and STILL we fail to heed its stern warning, we DESERVE to be ECLIPSED.

From the article: if properly assessed, could have prevented subsequent domestic Islamist attacks like the ones committed by Faisal Shahzad (May 2010), Detroit “honor killing” perpetrator Rahim A. Alfetlawi (2011); Amine El Khalifi, who plotted to blow up the U.S. Capitol (2012); Dzhokhar or Tamerlan Tsarnaev who conducted the Boston Marathon bombing (2013); Oklahoma beheading suspect Alton Nolen (2014); or Muhammed Yusuf Abdulazeez, who opened fire on two military installations in Chattanooga, Tennessee (2015). ----------------How was Homeland Security going to stop an honor killing? That's the pure stinky cheese. As if we can stop dad from taking out his firearm and blowing away the family if he gets the mind to.

The Tsarnaev's were known to law enforcement whose performance before the bombings was as ineffective as their performance during the bombings. The quick thinking man who escaped the car jacking was the hero, not the police.

How could the Oklahoma work place murder have been stopped?

This guy writes an article that is short on any serious specifics and does nothing but give the impression he's looking for some kind of street cred with the right so he can make a few bucks as a Faux Snooze "security expert".

There is only ONE sensible solution to ALL forms of Islamic Aggression. and that is a UTILITARIAN solution –– a FINAL Solution:

DIDADIN

DetainIntern Disempower AndDeportIslamaniacsNow

D-I-D-A-D-I-N!

Those who would be kind to the cruel are sure to be cruel to the kind."

"Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."

~ Thomas Paine (1737-1809)

DIDADIN!

However illegal, impolitic, inadvisable, unconstitutional, un-American, immoral or impracticable others claim it to be we should maintain a position of absolute intolerance for a Muslim Presence in OUR world.

When the Handwriting on the Wall sends a clear, uncompromising message, and STILL we fail to heed its stern warning, we DESERVE to be ECLIPSED.

I posit that the FBI was likely more involved with the terrorist to an extent yet to be revealed. Out of the 508 terrorism-related cases since September 11, 2001, more often than not, the FBI has had a hand in creating the very terrorist threat they have claimed to be protecting us from. Two-hundred and forty-three of these cases involved an FBI informant. In many instances, the targets of these operations, who are later accused of plotting attacks, are not only almost always Muslim, but they are also often suffering from a mental illness, such as schizophrenia. Moreover, the targets are also vulnerable and easily susceptible to bribery as they are desperate for money – so desperate, it seems, they will help put their own friends behind bars.

considering the approx 800 radical names 'scrubbed' from the lists of the FBI when Obama came in, one wonders.That sounded insane to me, but it Googles true.(maybe I just coined a term!?)Sure, someone at GeeeZ suggested if there aren't any names on any FBI list, then nobody can say "Obama missed it..." That sounds extreme, but WHY SCRUB NAMES after all the work of amassing them so they could at least keep an eye on radicals?

2011 – The CIA canceled an anti-terrorism conference scheduled for August 10-12, 2011. An email sent to conference registrants explained that the Department of Homeland Security would be formulating new guidelines for vetting speakers and screening presentation content.hosted by the CIA’s Threat Management Unit. https://counterjihadreport.com/tag/fbi-document-purge/

2013 – The administration pulled the plug on DHS National Targeting Center. The reason given was, “They claimed that since the Islamist groups in question were not Specially Designated Terrorist Organizations (SDTOs) tracking individuals related to these groups was a violation of the travelers’ civil liberties. These were almost exclusively foreign nationals: When were they granted the civil rights and liberties of American citizens?”.In the six months before being neutered the National Targeting Center had identified 300 terrorists.http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/homeland-security/263284-administration-nixed-probe-into-southern-california******San Bernardino:Supposedly Enrique had stronger connection with terrorists then I originally heard.http://www.cbsnews.com/news/san-bernardino-shooting-prosecutors-say-enrique-marquez-jr-knew-aspiring-jihadists/

Mr. Haley is quite something.He talks about Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood a lot and a mosque network.

When has Hamas ever named in relation to an attack on the U.S. The Muslim Brotherhood is also a favorite bogey man. When have they ever been implicated in a plot or attack on the U.S? If anything the attacks have gone the other way through our proxies in the Egyptian military.

Network of mosques? The New York PD wasted many millions monitoring mosques for years and came away with what - nada. Not a single bill of particulars.

He offers no indication that he knows jack all about identifying ties to ISIL.Like I say, a loser trying to make money passing himself off as a terrorism "expert" when he was in fact just a low level employee.

Between February and March of this year, Democrat presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton’s campaign made $187 in secret payments to secure the services of a Nevada-based company that destroys hard drives and shreds paper.

People better wake up and think for themselves! You can see the corrupt government politicians we have now! Don't forget about all the crap Hillary Clinton's in! The deaths she's caused, think about if those men were your sons! She turned her back on them along with everyone in Washington! She already said what jobs she will eliminate! She doesn't know what to do as president because she has said many times that she will hire her husband, Bill. That's was another scandal by the Clintons, REMEMBER THAT? YOU NEVER HEARD HILLARY SAY THAT SHE LOVES AMERICA!VOTE TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT 2016.TRUMP wants to rebuild America to be strong AGAIN!TRUMP wants a STRONG military again! TRUMP wants to keep ALL AMERICANS SAFE!VOTE TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT 2016

Ducky, you are correct, people from Trump's own party have said he's temperamentally unfit to be president, now they're suggesting he may have mental problems. It certainly looks like that to a lot of people on both sides of the aisle.

Is he cracking up under the pressure of a presidential campaign? If so, that doesn't bode well for the how he'd handle the pressures of the presidency.

I'm having serious doubts that he'll be the nominee. Besides the whacko rabid right wing bloggers who get their "news" from Breitbart.nuts, who is seriously backing Trump?

That woman spams her obscene crap all over the conservative blogosphere. She pollutes every place she leaves her putrid droppings. The idea was to get her unwelcome censored and banned. Instead you censor me. "O, Judgment thou hast fled to brutish beasts and men have lost their reason ..."

What is the difference between a Muslim who applies henna to his beard and a Muslim who beheads someone for rejecting Islam?

Answer: There is no difference. Both are following the example of the behavior of Mudhamhead -- his sunna.

This is an important word, because it is where the Sunnis take their name. The Sunnis, who make up 90 percent of all Muslims, are the followers of the ways of Mudhamhead, his behavior in all areas of his life. The Shias also follow the ways of Mudhamhead, as do Muslims from every minor sect.

The imitation of Mudhamhead could be as innocuous as wearing a full beard and applying orange coloration by dyeing it with henna, or stepping into a mosque with the right foot, but stepping out of it on the left foot. It is recorded that Mudhamhead did such things. Because Mudhamhead did it, imitating him is a way of racking up points with Allah.

Mudhamhead’s sunna including dyeing his beard with henna so that it appeared orange. Many fundamentalist Muslims will dye their beards because that’s what Mudhamhead did.

Thus is also considered praiseworthy to eat with two fingers and lick them three times after a meal, and triply praiseworthy to lick three fingers three times. And much more. An entire book held in great esteem by Muslims is the Shamail by Tirmizi, which gives an account of Mudhamhead’s mannerisms, habits, and physical characteristics. Osama bin Laden was known to model his mannerisms and habits by imitating what is found about Mudhamhead in the Shamail.

Mudhamhead also gave the example of horrific barbarity. His biography is a chronicle of assassinations, mass murder, genocide, plunder, and the enslavement of men, women, and children -- all against people who refused to accept him as “the last and final prophet,” as he claimed about himself. Osama bin Laden followed Mudhamhead’s example of mass murder, and it cost 3,000 people their lives on Sept. 11, 2001.

Mudhamhead beheaded people who rejected him, making it part of his sunna. Because he chopped off heads, Muslims today chop of heads of people who reject Islam

If Muslims were to limit their imitation of Mudhamhead by brushing their teeth the way he did, Islam might have a legitimate place in the non-Muslim world. But Muslims cannot pick and choose. Once they believe that he was the “Messenger of God” -- the affirmation of faith contained in the shahada, the Muslim declaration of faith -- they are declaring their faith that everything he did was good because it was in furtherance of God’s cause -- including his violence against people who rejected him.

Mudhamhead’s body was reduced to dust nearly 14 centuries ago, but his spirit lives on in his Koran, which contains numerous incitements to violence against people who rejected him, and in the example of his behavior -- his sunna. Every time suicide bombers blow themselves up, killing other people along with them, there is Mudhamhead. When the 9/11 hijackers slammed their passenger airplanes into buildings, there was Mudhamhead in the cockpit with them. Just today, as 50 people fell to the machine gun bullets of a Muslim who walked into a nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and opened fire, the spirit of Mudhamhead hovered in the background, nodding with approval.

The saying, “Know your enemy,” is attributed to Sun Tzu, the 6th century BC Chinese military strategist and author of The Art of War. If you don’t understand your enemy, but your enemy understands you, you lose. Islam understands the West, but the West does not understand Islam. The proof is that the West allows not just immigration from Muslim countries, but massive immigration of people who are committed to bringing about a world dominated by Islam. That is what Islam aspires to do because that is what Mudhamhead commanded it to do and showed how to do it by his example, his sunna.

Sun Tzu also said that all warfare is based on deception. Mudhamhead knew this and said the same to his followers. This is the practice as Islam spreads in the West: Show a friendly smile, insist that Islam is a religion of peace, but lay the groundwork to take over.

In the West some feeble efforts have begun to deal with Islam, such as banning the wearing of burkas and hijabs in public. These measures would be laughable if they weren’t such chilling evidence of ignorance about Islam.

The only way to save your family, your country, and your civilization from Islam is to get rid of it, but most people still have a long way to go before understanding that this must be done. It took Europe centuries of suffering Muslim predation before it finally organized crusades against Islam, ultimately pushing it back and containing it. Today, the non-Muslim world does not have the luxury of waiting centuries to defend itself.

It is important to consider the concept of critical mass in the formation of political will to take action. Without a critical mass of citizens who understand that Islam is their implacable enemy, and that it is implacable because it is founded on the behavior of Mudhamhead, his sunna, meaningful action will never be taken against it. At best, the wearing of hijabs in public will be forbidden. Critical mass can be achieved when those who have taken the trouble to understand that Islam is all about Mudhamhead teach what they know to others, and thus the knowledge spreads, and if this process is pursued aggressively, critical mass will eventually be achieved. The political will to take meaningful action will be there.

The burden for this is on the shoulders of those who have already become enlightened. In its perverse way, Islam is a helpmate in this, for every mass murder event such as the one in Florida encourages more people to understand what is behind it. Be there with the answers.

This process of education would accelerate if enlightened people who also happen to possess financial resources step into producer shoes and develop movies depicting Mudhamhead -- films that show this “Messenger of God” committing the atrocities that are attributed to him in Islam’s own literature.

Teach the grotesque truth about Mudhamhead, do so aggressively, and you will save your country and preserve your civilization.

[NOTE: This article may be reproduced in whole or in part provided the following attribution is given: Article by F. W. Burleigh, author of It’s All About Muhammad, a Biography of the World’s Most Notorious Prophet. He blogs at www.itsallaboutmuhammad.com]

Let's assume the Orlando attack was in fact a terrorist attack.Will you grant that as a terrorist attack it must have a political motive?

What was the motive?An attack on infrastructure such as a power station, large banking facility or the like would clearly be a likely terrorist attack but what of soft targets.

The likely motive if in fact there is political motivation would be the al-Qaeda objective of driving a wedge between Muslim and non Muslim populations in an attempt to inhibit the secularization of Muslims.

Obama's refusal to speak of this with a hard line tone makes sense in this frame while your hatred is in fact furthering the goals of radical Islam.

Ducky, I'm not sure demonizing Islam is always a bad idea...as most of the readers know, I don't believe every Muslim wants us dead but I know many people do. Demonizing is tough but it could be what it takes to wake muslims up to the REASONS for demonization.As you might know, most Muslims are not Koran readers...they read it, but American Muslims often don't speak Arabic so, since the rule is to read it IN Arabic, they read it phonetically, not knowing what they're saying..their Imams are like Catholic Nuns and Priests who interpret the word. You will notice most Imams have Arabic accents.When more and more Muslims wake up to the terrible provocations in the Koran of killing the infidel, etc., etc., (don't bother to deny that, it's just silly), a reformation can come. I strongly believe that.One thing I wish Mohammed Ali would have done before he died was gather "good Muslims" together and wake them up to the truth in their religion and act on it. it's not up to Americans to soothe the way for Muslims, it's really up to them to prove to us they don't mean US harm. I'm not sure that's a lot to ask. And from what's happening more and more, chances don't look good.

Again, I recommend reading SEEKING ALLAH, FINDING JESUS. Am not suggesting that every Muslim will want to find Jesus, but the input regarding the inability of this one Muslim to see the truth in his religion until he was really pushed to defend it and realized the evils is compelling and eye opening and goes a long way to helping us see what that faith is about...why many muslims don't have a clue. They're getting a clue now while they watch these murdering monsters....let's hope they're waking up and start talking, start denouncing the evil.

No z, my position will remain that there is inevitably a move toward modernization and secularization in Muslim nations. The Muslim population is young and tuned in on social media. It's happening.

Our position should be to encourage it.That can't be done effectively if we put it in opposition to Christianity. Making it a matter of that binary choice is a loss. We can't move forward without allowing Islam self respect.

I get a charge out of Trump's call to ban all Muslims. Now I live in an area with one of the larger Muslim populations in the country and can tell you the high tech, medical and bio tech industries want nothing to do with that nonsense.The secular Muslim population here is large. It is the Tsarnaev's who are the distinct tiny minority.

Instead of you brain dead koolaide drinkers soiling yourself about how utterly helpless you are doing at the polls, try doing something that makes sense like banning military type weapon sales in America.But NO, you'd rather protect a 1000 year old Admendment.

In populated places, be responsible for your personal safety. Make a mental note of emergency exits and locations of the nearest security personnel. Keep cell phones in your pockets instead of bags or on tables so you don’t lose them during an incident. Carry emergency contact details and any special needs information with you at all times.

We welcome civil dialogue at Always on Watch. Comments that include any of the following are subject to deletion:1. Any use of profanity or abusive language2. Off topic comments and spam3. Use of personal invective

Subscribe To

,

IMPORTANT NOTICE:Patrons of this Blog are advised that they will be held responsible
for any unlawful, harassing, libelous, abusive, threatening, or
harmful material of any kind or nature posted by their respective ISP.
Patrons are cautioned not to transmit via comments, including links
to any material that encourages conduct that could constitute a
criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwise violate
any applicable local, state, national or international law or
regulation. Comments here are typically unmoderated and unedited.
The fact that particular comments remain on the site
in no way constitutes the site owner's endorsement of commenters' views.