Which is better AMD or Intex

Guys, I am going to change my Laptop, I have two things in my mind, whether latest version by AMD or Intex. As far as I think, for computer gaming experience AMD is the best for his best graphic ability (but during games produces too much heat at the bottom near between fan and processor) and on the other hand Intex has the best processors and no- one can compete their processing speeds ( but lacks in graphic).

You guys, tell me which one is better because I want both Best Gaming Graphics as well as fast speed of the processor with their reliability.

Intel is usually faster and more optimized for games, but it's more costly. AMD is cheap and wins price vs performance, but Intel and Nvidia have the best performance but are more expensive.

Not gonna start the desktop vs laptop debate, but if you can do without portability always get a desktop. If you must stick with laptop I'm sure someone here can help you pick out a good one if you need more than just brand name to choose.

Not sure where you got AMD for graphics/Intel for whatever, but if you're saying CPUs, then it's plain and simple: AMD for low-budget, Intel for Gaming/high-budget, if you want the best gaming experience. If you're talking GPUs, Intel doesn't really work like that, it'd be Nvidia vs. AMD. For integrated CPU graphics, AMD's APUs (CPU + GPU) are pretty decent but I don't follow them as much and not sure about their reliability + compatibility in laptops. Intel Integrated 4000 graphics got quite an upgrade from the 3000, so it's going to be pretty decent performance wise, but obviously not even close to a dedicated GPU on it.

Also, speed of the processor doesn't really tell you anything in black and white, such as a 2500k running @ 3.3GHz would still beat out a FX8150 or something running at 4.2GHz or whatever ridiculous clocks they run on.

I ment that for CPU's, I don't believe AMD is anything good for a strong PC case, I mean I couldn't even convince myself taking one. You should be taking the Hashwell CPU's from Intel if you are on a big budget. AMD for GPU is what I prefer, NVIDIA is just more expensive, and not always better.

I ment that for CPU's, I don't believe AMD is anything good for a strong PC case, I mean I couldn't even convince myself taking one. You should be taking the Hashwell CPU's from Intel if you are on a big budget. AMD for GPU is what I prefer, NVIDIA is just more expensive, and not always better.

I just disagree. In standard gaming I don't feel that you are really going to notice that much, if any, difference between what is considered the top of the line affordable Intel and the top of the line affordable AMD, at least not enough that I would consider buying Intel. Intel may be more powerful overall, and benchmarks better, but what matters is what the end user actually detects. I personally think that AMD provides more bang for the buck, and I'm still even using a 965 Black Box edition that is years old and is still doing perfectly fine on new games maxed out.

If you want to say that you have the more powerful processor, and you have the money, go Intel as Intel might outlast an AMD as far as performance-meets-game. I personally tend to upgrade before either would actually meet their bottleneck (with this 965 being the exception, which still really hasn't).