Note: Citations are based on reference standards. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study. The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied.

In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties; before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master. Response of California defendants, June 1, 1959, to findings, conclusions, and briefs proposed by other parties, April 1, 1959. (Signatures follow each response)

Description based on collective title-page; added title-page has distinctive subtitle: Response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and opening brief of the state of Arizona."June 1, 1959."

Description:

1 volume (various pagings)

Other Titles:

Response June 1, 1959State of Arizona, complainant versus State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District [and others], defendantsResponse of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and opening brief of the state of ArizonaState of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District [and others], defendantsResponse of California defendants, June 1, 1959; to findings, conclusions, and briefs proposed by other parties, April 1, 1959California responses, June 1959Arizona v. California, 1959

Reviews

Tags

Add tags for "In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties; before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master. Response of California defendants, June 1, 1959, to findings, conclusions, and briefs proposed by other parties, April 1, 1959. (Signatures follow each response)".Be the first.