Beep

I'm not getting good reception on your talk page. Call me back on my shellphone! (AGAIN.) San Saber 23:43, 5 October 2010 (CEST)

13 episodes a season

http://ifmagazine.com/feature.asp?article=3955
In the eyes of DXC, the 26 ep production season is two 13 ep broadcast seasons. "Season 7" is consists of all 13 episodes from 2010 and "Season 8" is 13 episodes that will be shown in 2011. The DVDs will follow the 2010/2011 divide. As a result I undid your edit to Resurrection. I hope you understand Thegreyanomaly 03:44, 6 October 2010 (CEST)

Hi, Aki. Just noticed you've been replacing the (Production Code) thingies with the "ein" template. I know it's kind of our standard, but it looks terrible, while the other one's actually pretty eye-pleasing... at least, the way I see it. (And that's what we want, right? The readers should be happy with the pages they're reading.) I was wondering if you were gonna start changing articles so they'll all use the template. If so: Please, don't! San Saber 01:16, 5 December 2010 (CET)

As you say it is our standard. If it is bad then the standard must be changed. In my opinion the ein template should continue, but be changed into something more eyepleasing. I'll work on it, and while I do, please don't change any of the templates. Aki 01:59, 5 December 2010 (CET)

Multiple redirects

You recently created 2851 which redirects to 2850s which redirects to 29th century which redirects to Timeline. Why wouldn't you just redirect 2851 to the section of the timeline you want (Timeline#2500 — 2899, the pound will bring a person to a section of a page)? I don't know if there is a set policy around here (feel free to enlighten me if there is!), but in my experience , double redirects are generally frowned on because they aren't helpful. Redirects will only direct once. Double redirects are always found at Special:DoubleRedirects. —Jedi♥Rogue 02:55, 29 December 2010 (CET)

I am going to assume it was a casual mistake due to a lot of articles being turned into redirects, so the editor might not have paid attention to that. But you are correct, double redirects are frown upon. --Sviptalk 12:54, 29 December 2010 (CET)

Svip is correct, it was a mistake. I was editing and decided to redirect it to the articles as they were all ones I plan to create in the close future. Thanks for the notice though. Aki 20:43, 29 December 2010 (CET)

And ofcourse I misspelled Futurama for the new redirect... Aki 01:17, 25 February 2011 (CET)

Unforgivable! I hate to torment you, buddy, but you did the same thing here. I hope you pay more attention when you're writing your novel. [Laughs, then cries.] Also, can you give me a hand over at the FA department? Sanfazer 23:54, 25 February 2011 (CET)

Characters

I thought that it was the Norse god also but the Marvel hero would fit the superhero theme of the episode. Teyrn of Highever 18:10, 9 May 2011 (CEST)

I also took into account that the term "Mighty Thor" on Google and Wikipedia would give the marvel character as hits rather than the Norse god, but, without knowing which, your move was the right thing to do. Teyrn of Highever 18:16, 9 May 2011 (CEST)

Seeing as Leela's remark was way before they got superpowers, I think such a reference seem unlikely. Also, she did mention Thor right after constructing Swedish furniture, and Sweden is one of the current countries in which Thor was big. I think the best thing is to assume nothing. Aki 19:31, 9 May 2011 (CEST)

Where I got Futurama Pictures off of.

Hey Aki this is FuturamaRULES user, I got the pictures off of the Futurama Commercials on T.V. They usually come on after an episode goes to commercials. I just took Screenshot captions of it. If you want a link to most of the Commercials, go to this video I made here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9efxwwBMhao

Thank you, I learned it from another source but thanks anyway. :) Also, in the future, you can sign your talk page edits (like this one) by writing ~~~~ after your text. - akitalk 22:59, 13 June 2011 (CEST)

Thanks for the support, re: credits pages

I think these two should not be on different articles. I think the former is merely a different form of the former. Bender does refer to the former as "Oi, this guy..." indicating Bender knows him. Since Bender does know the Galactic Entity, I think it is clear that he knows/thinks these two to be the same. How do you think this should be addressed on the articles. Thegreyanomaly 03:21, 4 July 2011 (CEST)

Thanks. I made you a reply on the talk page to the Galactic Entity article. - akitalk 15:17, 4 July 2011 (CEST)

I don't agree with this edit. It doesn't make sense to say "Bender's robot ghost". Bender is a Robot, so his ghost is a Robot ghost. He doesn't have a Human ghost. I think the edit should be undone. Sanfazer 19:31, 4 July 2011 (CEST)

In the episode, there is a clear distinction between ghosts and robot ghosts - according to the Gypsy, only the latter exist. I feel this distinction as important as that between Robot Hell and Hell. - akitalk 19:36, 4 July 2011 (CEST)

Yes. But "Bender's ghost" is the ghost of a Robot, that Robot being Bender. It's not the ghost of a Robot of Bender. "Bender's robot ghost" sounds wrong. Take the transcript for the episode as an example. Would it be logical to change "Bender's ghost" to "Bender's robot ghost" there? Sanfazer 19:42, 4 July 2011 (CEST)

The transcript is different, because it is not meant to be encyclopedic - it is meant to be understandable. I disagree with you about this, but I don't mind you reverting it if you wish to. I don't think it's big enough a deal to make a fuss of it. - akitalk 19:47, 4 July 2011 (CEST)

Didn't think about that, but it's ture. The transcript can't be much of an example. And no, there's absolutely no need to make a fuss of this. I would never want that. The edit's been undone. Also, one last attempt to convince you: "The Robot Devil's Robot ghost"? Haha. Sanfazer 20:01, 4 July 2011 (CEST)

Haha. :p I agree that it sounds bad, but I also don't think the sounding is a valid argument. :) - akitalk 20:05, 4 July 2011 (CEST)

I know, I know. I just wanted to be funny for a moment... Sanfazer 20:14, 4 July 2011 (CEST)

moving Hyper-Chicken to Matcluck

Hey, I was wondering, why hasn't this article been moved to Matcluck? We know his name, so it seems logical to move the article to his actual name. I would have just moved the page, but I thought it would be good to get other opinions first. Thegreyanomaly 21:02, 8 July 2011 (CEST)

I didn't know he had that name. When did we learn that? - akitalk 21:04, 8 July 2011 (CEST)

By looking at the article I see his name is revealed as Zapp calls him "Matcluck" in a deleted scene. I don't own Into the Wild Green Yonder, so I can't look myself, but are you sure that's actually his real name? Isn't it just what Zapp calls him as a reference to Matlock? - akitalk 21:29, 8 July 2011 (CEST)

Aki is right. Matcluck is very unlikely his real name. Sanfazer 03:03, 9 July 2011 (CEST)

Scruffy is still male

He just had a cameo on Yo Leela Leela. Before they were filming Leela's show, you can see him holding a fixture for a second. Just thought I should tell you Thegreyanomaly 04:20, 22 July 2011 (CEST)

REINCARNATION PREVIEW FROM YOUTUBE VIDEO

Hey Aki,
just wondering if the commentators on Attack of the Killer App actually called her Susan Boil, I haven't got the discs as they aren't out here, but since you wrote the commentary article... - Quolnok 08:48, 8 August 2011 (CEST)

Hi. I've replied on Talk:Susan Boil, thanks for bringing it to my attention (I haven't checked out the recent changes in ages, so I miss this kind of thing). - akitalk 12:49, 8 August 2011 (CEST)

Awesome pictures

Small Concern about Bender

I was looking on Benders page on this site, and it says the head is 1055 older than its body, which is true until "Where No Fan Has Gone Before" because his head blew up at the end of the episode. So maybe you could say his Mouth Piece is 1055 years older than his head and body? :-/ What do you think? Maybe his head blowing up wasn't canon?

Thanks for the tip. :) I am too busy these days, so I generally keep track on Futurama news through PEEL. :P If anything valuable comes up, they usually have it. ^^ - akitalk 13:09, 3 September 2011 (CEST)

Bots and The Bees is 7ACV01

I think that since David X Cohen hinted that the bender impregnating soda machine might be the premiere, I found out that The Bots and The Bees is the name of the episode, and theres an animatic posted on youtube.com

Needed edit to Template:Season infobox

Hey, I've noticed that for release= the default text says "On DVD(s)", what about the BD releases? Can an edit be made to the template to accommodate this? Maybe there can be a release2= for the releases on BD as well?