Google+ Followers

Tuesday, 31 October 2017

Corbyn is seen as 'skipping' the Balfour dinner much as if he was a naughty schoolboy skipping compulsory classes

Now is not the time to retreat into a Jewish ghetto

The recent Labour Party conference
marked a break from the past two years of the false anti-Semitism smear campaign. For the first time since Corbyn was elected it is the Zionists who are
on the defensive:

i.The Left of the Labour Party, despite a few Zionists such as Jon Lansman and Rhea Wolfson (and the remaining members of the AWL), are pro-Palestinian. Not only have people not
bought into the ‘anti-Semitism’smears of but these allegations have had the effect that people have become educated as to the real nature of Zionism and the Israeli State's Apartheid policies. We have to
transform support for the Palestinians into opposition to Zionism, the racist
political ideology that has spawned Israeli Apartheid. What this means concretely is explaining that the 2 States Solution is a Zionist solution. The reason Labour Friends of Israel and the Jewish Labour Movement support it is because it will never happen. What it does is serve as a convenient smokescreen for the present, overtly Apartheid situation on the West Bank where there are 2 legal systems and segregation in every aspect of life between Jewish settlers and Palestinians. As long as the fig leaf of 2 States, which neither Likud nor the Zionist Union opposition supports, remains as a diplomatic pretence, then Israel has an excuse not to grant equal rights in the Occupied Territories. The call for recognition of a Palestinian state is even more absurd. Labour's leaders love it but how can you recognise a state that doesn't exist? ii. The tide has begun to change as a result of the alliance between the Zionists and the Labour Right. LFI MPs such as Chair Joan Ryan, Peter Kyle and John Woodcock were in the forefront of distancing themselves from Corbyn in the last election. Ryan went as far as to say she understood that her constituents liked May more than Corbyn! Labour candidate defending London seat admits people have more confidence in Theresa May than Jeremy CorbynThe Jewish Labour Movement, when Owen Smith challenged for the leadership, voted by 92%-4% for Owen Smith.

People have also begun to see through the ritual accusations of 'anti-Semitism'. For example when I was first suspended in Brighton 18
months ago even some people in Momentum supported my suspension on the basis
that there was no smoke without fire.
Now it is clear to everyone that the accusations of anti-Semitism are weaponised and have
no merit.

Rebecca Simon, Vice-Chair of Labour Friends of Israel, described Corbyn as 'rubbish' yet they were outraged when Jeremy decided he had better things to do than attend their fringe meeting

iii.Jeremy Corbyn’s decision not to attend the
Labour Friends of Israel fringe meeting at Conference went down well. It is less than two years ago that the Vice
Chair of Labour Friends of Israel, Rebecca Simon was quoted
in the Jewish Chronicle as saying of Corbyn ‘And he is rubbish — never mind about the Israel stuff, he is just not a
credible opposition.” It was
another supporter of LFI Michael Foster who went to court to stop Jeremy standing against Owen Smith. LFI is
a front for the Israeli Embassy. It is
Blairite through and through and is led by Joan Ryan MP, whose only achievement
since being in Parliament is to claim record parliamentary expenses in 2006-7, having been the runner up the previous year. During the parliamentary expenses scandal she had to pay back over £5,000 having 'flipped' her main and second homes. What is amazing is why Corbyn’s advisers ever thought that he would
gain anything by appeasing Labour’s Apartheid lobby and attending Labour Friends
of Israel’s events.

Only the Sun came to the rescue of Warren Morgan

iv.The attempts by the Jewish Labour Movement’s supporters
on the National Policy Forum and this includes Emily Thornberry, to remove the
Manifesto commitments to opposing Israel’s occupation, the settlements and the
siege of Gaza, were reversed at Conference.

The fall out from Brighton Council Leader Warren Morgan's accusations of antisemitism at Labour Conference has led to calls for him to go

iv.The attack by the
Leader of Brighton and Hove Labour Group Warren Morgan on the Labour Party
Conference as ‘anti-Semitic’ and his threat that Labour wouldn’t be welcome in
Brighton has completely backfired with his only support coming from those well
known anti-racist papers, The Sun and The Daily Mail.. At least 4 Brighton and Hove branches (including Preston Park,
East Brighton, Queens Park, Brunswick & Adelaide) have called for his
resignation or an apology. Veteran Labour Councillor Kevin Allen has broken
ranks and called for Morgan to
go. Morgan has taken to
turning up uninvited to Ward meetings to try and persuade them that he should
not be censored.

v.Free Speech on Israel and the newly established
Jewish Voices for Labour held large meetings at Conference and the JVL meeting
was attended by union leaders, Len McLuskey of Unite and Tosh MacDonald of
ASLEF, who promised support to an alternative to the racist Jewish Labour
Movement.

vi.Corbyn has turned down an invitation to a
Balfour Declaration cententary dinner provoking apoplexy amongst the Zionists. It's
not 'antisemitic' for Jeremy Corbyn not to celebrate the centenary of the
Balfour Declaration – it's sensible.
Indeed throughout Britain the Zionist celebrations of the Declaration have
fallen flat. The Zionists had hoped to make
propaganda out Britain’s agreement to steal the land of the Palestinians and
hand it to the Zionists 100 years ago but most people have been unmoved. Indeed a poll commissioned by the Israeli propaganda
group BICOM found
that the number of people supporting the Declaration had dropped from 43% in
the past year. News has just come in
that the Balfour celebration event at the University of Manchester, which has
recently come under heavy
attack has now been moved elsewhere.
Officially the sponsors decided to move the event but it is clear that they were made to feel unwelcome.

vii.The Zionists were particularly outraged at the
Labour Party Marxists newsletter at Labour’s conference entitled ‘anti-Semitism is not anti-Zionism’ and
an article by Moshe Machover describing the support that the Nazis gave to the Zionists
even whilst most Jews were trying to overthrow the regime. This provoked the Right into ‘auto excluding’
i.e. expelling without a hearing Moshe Machover, the veteran Israeli anti-Zionist
and founder of Matzpen.

This in turn has provoked a furious backlash by Labour Party
members resulting in dozens of party units sending in motions condemning this
outrageous breach of Labour Party democracy.
All the indications are that the witch hunters, led by Sam Matthews of
the Disputes Committee are looking for a way to backtrack. Expelling Jews and Israelis for
‘anti-Semitism’ may be the Zionist way of tackling ‘anti-Semitism’ but it is
not how most people see it!

People are increasingly seeing through the ‘anti-Semitism’
smears and realise that the reason for the Right’s fondness for the International
Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of anti-Semitism has less to do with
hatred of Jews and more to do with their inability to defend Israel. Everyone knows that anti-Semitism is
negligible in the Labour Party. That is
why the behaviour of Jon Lansman in supporting the idea that anti-Semitism in
the Labour Party is a problem is disgraceful and only gives comfort to Corbyn's enemies
who aren’t in the least concerned about racism.

The fact remains that the Zionists are still
strong and entrenched in the structures of the Labour Party. The JLM is an affiliated socialist society with
the power to move resolutions at Labour Party conference and have delegates to the
CLPs. The fact that the ‘sister party’
as it calls itself (in fact the British wing of the Israeli Labour Party) is
represented inside the Labour Party at all and is taken to be the Jewish wing
of Labour is an outrage. It is the
living proof that racism and the legacy of the British Empire have not been
eradicated inside Labour. The affiliation
of what was Poale Zion was a direct consequence of the British Empire’s
alliance with the Zionist movement.
Balfour, known as ‘bloody Balfour’ in Ireland was the foremost
representative of the Empire.

There is a need for a genuine pro-Palestinian group in the Labour Party - Labour Friends of Palestine is a dead duck

The traditional pro-Palestinian group, Labour
Friends of Palestine is worse than useless.
Its latest escapade was to hold a meeting at the
House of Commons with one of the authors of the false anti-Semitism campaign, Progress
MP Wes Streeting. It has kept quiet
during the past two years of the false anti-Semitism campaign. It was blindingly obvious to most people that
allegations of ‘anti-Semitism were weaponised against supporters of the Palestinians
yet LFP said nothing saw nothing and heard nothing. Indeed many of their supporters were up to their ears in this campaign because most of their parliamentary
supporters were anti-Corbyn.

LFP have 133 MP supporters whereas LFI have
just 76 MP. Yet this is deceptive. Not only has the LFP site not been updated
for a long time, the late Gerald Kaufmann is still listed, as is Simon Danzuk
but another curious factor stares out.
Nearly half the Labour Friends of Israel supporters, 36 in total are also supporters of the LFP. In other words half the LFP’s supporters are on both sides of the
conflict between the oppressor and oppressed.
In practice most of these people are died-in-the wool Zionists like
Streeting, Ian Lucas and Stephen Twigg.

The full role call of the opportunists is below
but what this shows is that there is a need within the Labour Party for a new,
pro-Palestinian organisation. A
campaigning group which is anti-Zionist and which calls for a democratic, secular
not a Jewish state. We can leave that to
the LFI. 35 years ago, in the wake of
the 1982 Lebanon invasion the Labour Committee on Palestine, later the Labour
Movement Campaign on Palestine was formed.
At the 1982 Labour Party conference it was able to able to get a motion
supporting a democratic, secular state on Palestine passed. Any campaign on Palestine must tackle the
racist and apartheid nature of the Israeli state. Two states plays into the hands of the Zionists
which is why LFI and JLM support it.

The call for 2 states, apart from being
impossible to achieve, which is why the Zionist organisations support it, is
wrong in principle. It accepts the
partition of Palestine. It accepts that
an apartheid Jewish state will continue.
But worst of all, as long as there are illusions in such a state then Israel
has a pretext not to grant the Palestinians of the West Bank full equality or
indeed any democratic or civil rights.

One of the key demands must be for Labour to
break with Zionism and that means the JLM must be disaffiliated. We don’t call for them to be expelled as individuals although most of them would leave. The idea that a supporter of Israeli Apartheid,
affiliated to the World Zionist Organisation which funds the settlements in the
West Bank, should be an affiliate should be a matter of shame. In 1984 Jeremy Corbyn sponsored and chaired an
LMCP Conference which specifically called for the breaking
of links with Poale Zion. Corbyn may
now prefer not to remember his previous role but it is our job to remind
him. The Israeli state should not have a
presence within a socialist party.

What then of Free Speech on Israel and the new Jewish
Voice for Labour? All the indications
are that with the formation of JVL, FSI has been cut
adrift. When Tom Watson attacked
FSOI over the remarks that Miko Peled made when he said that everything should
be discussed including the Holocaust, this was distorted as meaning he wanted a
debate on whether the Holocaust occurred or not. Elements in JVL, in particular David Rosenberg
of the Jewish Socialists Group, refused to defend Peled or FSOI.

That leaves the newly formed Jewish Voice for
Labour. Its meeting at conference, over
300 people attended to listen to Avi Shlaim and Sir Stephen Sedley. The meeting was a great
success and it made a great impact. But
one meeting does not an organisation make.
The question is what it does with that impact. As I’ve already said, JVL
faces a choice – Jewish anti-Zionism or Jewish Identity Politics. JVL can become an organisation that actively campaigns
against Labour Zionism in the Labour Party or it can engage in Jewish identity
politics. What it can’t do is fudge the
issue.

Rob Abrams is JVL's resident bigot but he is allowed to be by the Moderators

When I was first approached to
sign their founding statement I said that their formation as a Jewish only group was a
mistake. Their role is a political not an ethnic one. There is a role
for Jewish only groups in e.g. BDS, but in the Labour Party there is no
point. Apart from anything else it
restricts your membership. There was the
absurd position whereby the JVL was criticising the JLM for having non-Jewish members.

JVL is in the worst possible world
of having non-Jews as associate members
and Jewish members as full members with voting rights. An apartheid model of organisation is not a
healthy one. Rather than face my criticism openly and honestly, the
moderators of the Facebook group, led by the Jewish Socialist Group’s Ian Saville and Julia Bard chose
to exclude me from the group.

The result was predictable. A few weeks ago their
Facebook group exploded. What had once
had over 200 members was purged. People
were forced to reapply with the result that current membership is around
half the original number. Because of their paranoia and
despite me arguing to the contrary, they turned the FB group from a closed
group into a secret group, meaning no one can find them anymore! Hardly the way to build a mass organisation.

Below I have included some screenshots of the ‘debate’
that occurred between Jewish chauvinists, mainly soft Zionists like Rob Abrams, Miri Franklin, Joseph Finlay and others and non-Jewish members which led to the exit of most non-Jews and a few Jewish
members too. Some of the comments border on racism. At one point some of the Zionist members decided to speak in Hebrew in order that non-Jews couldn't understand them.

The founders of the JVL excluded both the
International Anti-Zionist Network and myself from their founding meeting
because of these disagreements. What
they have to do if they want to retain democratic credibility is hold an open
conference where these things can be discussed.
It is right that it shouldn’t be a hardline anti-Zionist group, however
it is wrong that it should say absolutely nothing about for example the Palestinian Right
of Return or the Apartheid nature of the Israeli state. Given that Israel is a Jewish state, it is incumbent upon Jews to take a clear stance on Israel and Zionism.Instead JVL chose, in its founding
principles, to hide behind the anodyne phrase:

‘We stand for rights and justice for Jewish people everywhere and against
wrongs and injustice to Palestinians and other oppressed people anywhere.’

Some of JVL's bigots just love the term 'goysplaining' (from 'Goy' or non-Jews) which basically translated means that Jews don't want to hear the opinion of non-Jews when it comes to being Jewish

Joe Grabiner is another Zionist bigot whose found a home in JVL

I suspect that the Jewish Labour Movement could
also sign up to this statement. It is
meaningless.
Is it opposed to segregation in Israel?
Does it support the Jewish nature of the Israeli state, that is Jewish supremacy? Does it support the Right of 'Return' of Jews? Nothing is to be gained by appeasing its soft
Zionist fringe. If it is seriously trying to supplant the JLM then it should be
honest and open and say that it stands for their disaffiliation because the latter group represents only Zionist Jews (& their non-Jewish supporters).

The JVL has to decide what its role is. Is it there to confront the Zionist
presence in the Labour Party, which is involves opposition to the alliance with
the United States or is it simply a place where liberal leftish Jews can get
together to exchange their experiences in some kind of consciousness raising
group, in the mistaken belief that Jews in Britain are oppressed as Jews?

Tony Greenstein

What is laughable is that Jewish chauvinist Rob Abrams sees himself as some kind of Bundist

MPs who support Labour Friends of Israel & Labour Friends of Palestine

Rob Abrams and a few other Jewish chauvinists have come up with the derogatory term 'goysplaining'

One of the things that Jewish members of JVL don't understand is that Jews in Britain are White i.e. not oppressed therefore there is no comparison between their situation and that of Black or Muslim people

Saturday, 28 October 2017

I have had my differences
with Norman Finkelstein who, despite his pedigree as an ex-Maoist, is really an old time John Stuart Mill radical, over
such things as BDS but no one can doubt that Norman is a powerful and brave
intellect. It is therefore with some
shock that I read that he was brutally arrested in the middle of the night by
New York Police, because of criticism he has made of 2 corrupt lawyers and a
corrupt judicial system.

Norman is 64 years old. He was, in his
own words, treated like a ‘sack of potatoes’, handcuffed, thrown to the ground
and his head banged against the wall by these police thugs. This is no doubt normal in the Trump State of
America.

It is a lesson that even leftist intellectuals are not immune to the
attentions of the State if they step of line.
It would appear that Norman did exactly that.

I’ve taken this article from Norman’s site. It appeared in something called the New Nationalist. As I’m not a nationalist I’ve edited
certain phrases that could be considered anti-Semitic however the substance of what the article
says should be widely disseminated.

Dr. Norman Finkelstein has been an activist for Palestinian rights for decades, he has been a
real thorn in the side of the Zionist machine. He’s decisively anti-war and an
ardent defender of First Amendment rights to free speech. He has called Israel
a “lunatic state” and asks, “Why should these Palestinians, who have lived in
Jerusalem for hundreds of years, be evicted from their homes so that Jews from
Brooklyn can live in them?”

For his troubles, Finkelstein was ultimately removed from his
professorship. He’s a prime example of what happens to Jews who are opposed to Zionism.

He has also dwelled on the politics of the holocaust and wrote the books
“The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of
Jewish Suffering” and “Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the
Abuse of History.” He has an acerbic tongue and tells it like it is, as
demonstrated below.

He is not afraid to go head to head with police state Zionists like Alan
Dershowitz and Bernard Levy. See the next video in which he effectively called
them overrated mouthpieces. In an NPR
interview head to head with Dershowitz, he called the latter a
plagiarist. Finkelstein was able to show rather convincingly some
highlighted sections of Dershowitz’s book that were lifted directly from
previous works without citations, including the same ellipses and spelling
errors.

Dr. Finkelstein has a natural tendency to go to bat for those who are
suffering from true (versus faux) injustices. In observing Finkelstein over the
years, he sometimes wears his emotions on his sleeve. He also does not suffer
fools lightly and can be combative.

Recently he was involved in defending aGuyanese medical
doctor who was once one of his students. According to Finkelstein, Dr. Rudolph
Baldeo had fallen prey in a divorce case to a couple of Long Island
matrimonial lawyers named Michael Chetkof and Allyson Burger. The case and the
affronts are discussed on Finkelstein’s blog.

Finkelstein also gives the background at a site where he is organizing a petition to disbar these attorneys.
For those who dislike injustice, you know what to do. Finkelstein states.

'They concocted this grotesque story that he (Baldeo) was a psychopath
who had committed “countless” acts of “unspeakable violence.” I sat down to
read the entire Court record. I sat in the Courthouse during the
trial. I was shocked. It was a transparent frame-up! Their
Court testimony flagrantly contradicted their written submissions to the
Court. (See www.NormanFinkelstein.com for irrefutable proof of
their lies.)'

When I told these vulture-lawyers that I was writing an article to
expose the shakedown, they threatened to “open Pandora’s Box” and destroy Dr
Baldeo “Personally and Professionally.” Michael Chetkof and Allyson Burger are
blackmailing Dr. Baldeo to silence me.

On Oct. 9, the situation took a turn for the worst in what can only be
described as star chamber justice. Star chamber justice is a topic we
have written about before. Not surprisingly what is being put forth
here is NOT being covered in any major media.

That night Norman received “the knock at the door” in the middle of the
night. He was arrested by two Nassau County detectives who jailed him.

So now we know Norman was arrested in the middle of the night in his
undershorts for a misdemeanor, a vague one at that, of “harassment” and
“threat.”

Curiously, he was due to appear in court the next day at his friend’s
case. TNN can find no charges or due process for justifying this type of
arrest. Finkelstein called the lawyers involved “mafiosi,” serial liars and the female half, Burger,
“a normally loquacious yenta wannabe.” But libel cases are civil and don’t
involve middle-of-the-night arrests. Nor do failures to answer a non-felony
summon. Norman is now accusing his enemies of being behind these strong-arm
star-chamber tactics.

He recounts the incident in his blog and in this video clip. Norman is 64
years old.

Two Nassau County (Long Island) detectives barged into my apartment in
the dead of night without a search warrant. I was only wearing my boxer
drawers. I refused to put on clothes. They pinned me up against the wall
and handcuffed me. For the next 18 hours, I was relentlessly brutalized by
these thugs. The next day at 2:30 p.m. I came before Hon. Judge
William Hohauser. He was shocked! He was appalled! How could I be
wearing my boxer drawers in court?! The judge demanded $7,500 bail and ordered
that I get a full psychiatric evaluation.

When Tom
Watson, Luke Akehurst, Warren Morgan or any other creature of Labour’s Right talks about ‘anti-Semitism’
you can be sure that they aren’t talking about anti-Jewish racism but defending
Israel’s colonial racism by making counter accusations of racism as a means of
throwing sand in peoples’ eyes.

Palestinian Bedouin children playing at the Tyre School, Khan al-Ahmar, the only robust structure in the village (it is made of rubber tyres).The school has 170 students, of which 85 are girls, and is run by 15 teachers. The students come from five different Bedouin communities in the surrounding area. It is partially funded by EU governments. It has many classrooms, a small football field made with turf, and a playground. Photo uncredited.

Israel’s
racism, in Judaifying an area, is no different to the Nazis 'deJewifying' areas of Jews. It is indefensible politically or morally.
The only response is to ratchet up the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions campaign. We know that this is the weapon that the Israeli
state most hates because they have set up a $50m+ dirty tricks fund under the
Minister of Public Security, Gilad Erdan.

Everywhere
BDS is under attack because it is held to be ‘anti-Semitic’. In America states such as Kansas are
demanding of those who do business with the state that they declare they have nothing
to do with BDS. In Texas people are being refused aid as a result of the recent hurricane unless they agree to sign a piece of paper saying they oppose the Boycott of Israel. Apart from
this being an outrageous infringement on the right to free speech under the First
Amendment this shows the lengths that Israel's Apartheid Lobby will go to force people to support their state.

It is
therefore good to see the American Civil Liberties Union taking legal action
against the State of Kansas in order to stop it penalising people who exercise
their right to engage in BDS actions.

In this
country we see those apostles of anti-racism – the Daily Mail/Express/Telegraph
et al in the forefront of labelling solidarity with the Palestinians as ‘anti-Semitic’. Their hypocrisy is belied by their own racist
record when it comes to discrimination against every other group bar Zionists.

The Israeli government has asked the Supreme Court to approve plans to
demolish an entire Palestinian Bedouin community. The government said the
demolition should take place by mid-2018.

This would be the first time an entire Palestinian community has been
demolished since 1967. Khan al-Ahmar, home to 173 people, is located in Area C
– the 60 percent of the West Bank under full Israeli control. The Israeli
government considers the community’s presence there illegal, and has issued
demolition orders for all of its structures earlier this year.

The village is home to one of 20 Jahalin Bedouin communities at risk of
expulsion due to Israeli settlement expansion in this area, strategically
located between East Jerusalem and Ma’aleh Adumim, the West Bank’s largest
settlement. Known as E1, an Israeli construction plan for this area has been
frozen since 2009, following international outrage. The communities are made up
of 2,300 Palestine refugees who were originally displaced by Israel in the
1950s.

Plans for this area, critics have argued, are aimed at linking Ma’ale
Adumim to Jerusalem, therefore breaking the territorial contiguity of a
prospective Palestinian state – and jeopardising the feasibility of a two-state
solution.

A Palestinian woman inspects the debris after Israeli authorities ordered the demolition of her home in the Bedouin village of Khan Al-Ahmar, February 2017. Photo by Hamza Shalash/Apaimages

Abu Khamis, the mukhtar of Khan al-Ahmar, knows that his community has
become a symbol of the Palestinian struggle to remain in their lands.

“There’s
proof this community has been here since 1967. We are only the first piece of
the puzzle in the bigger picture,” Abu Khamis told Palestine Monitor. “If they relocate this community, they will
relocate all other communities in the area,” he said, adding that he
believes international pressure can help postpone the transfer – a strategy
that has worked over the years, while leaving the community in a constant state
of insecurity.

Residents of the nearby settlement of Kfar Adumim, together with the
pro-settler organisation Regavim, have been filing petitions to evict the
residents of Khan al-Ahmar and demolish its primary school – which serves 174
pupils from the village and five neighbouring communities – since 2009.
Regavim, which is involved in other high-profile demolition cases in the West
Bank, such as the village of Susyia in the South Hebron Hills, declares its
mission to be “ensur[ing] responsible, legal, accountable & environmentally
friendly use of Israel’s national lands and the return of the rule of law to
all areas”, as stated on its website. The fourth and last petition was filed in
2016.

Unlike on previous occasions, the community’s lawyer, Shlomo Lecker, is
concerned that this time the court will accept the State’s answer when asked to
provide an alternative for residents. Israel plans to relocate them to lands
near the Palestinian town of Abu Dis, in an area known as Jabal West.

“It’s a symbolic
act to please the right-wing,” Lecker said, speaking at a meeting with
representatives of NGOs and diplomatic missions last week.

The appearance of Bedouin villages, now often built from scrap materials, is, like Khan al-Ahmar L, often of a makeshift and ramshackle camp. Like other Palestinians, Bedouin cannot get permits to build more substantial homes.

Rights groups have opposed these plans.

“While the government argues that
the residents of Khan al-Ahmar will receive alternative housing, they will in
fact be evacuated against their will for the benefit of settlers, and placed
above the garbage dump in Abu Dis,” said a statement from Israeli
anti-settlement NGO Peace Now after the government submitted its answer to the
Supreme Court on the settlers’ petition on Monday. “This type of forceful evacuation of protected persons constitutes a
severe violation of international humanitarian law.”

“It appears
that the forceful displacement of the residents of Khan al-Ahmar is a form of
“compensation” for his right wing supporters for the upcoming evacuation of the
Illegal outpost of Derech Ha’Avot, following a High Court ruling,” the
statement added.

B’Tselem said Israel was asking the High Court for “permission to commit a war crime.” Hagai El-Ad, B’Tselem’s executive
director, said:

“No sanctimonious language about a
‘planning, proprietary and realistic’ alternate, or ‘time to prepare’ can erase
the disgrace or hide the facts: the destruction of Khan al-Ahmar means the
forcible transfer of protected persons, and forcible transfer is a war crime.”

Abu Khamis told Palestine Monitor that voluntarily moving to the
proposed location is not an option, and that the community will continue to
fight to stay.

Learning to read and write, to paint and to play: what will happen to these children’s education if yet another Bedouin village is demolished?

Meanwhile, children at the “tyre school” nearby are taking a break and
playing outside the class-rooms. The school, which stands out as the only real
building in the village with its painted mud walls – the rest are makeshift
structures made of wood and corrugated iron – provides a safe space for
children to play as well as study in this isolated desert community. Despite
its location just off a highway a few kilometres from Jerusalem, the only road
that leads to the village is an unpaved, winding track.

“Students
here, some of them from nearby villages, know the school is at risk,” said
Halimeh Zahalka, the school’s headteacher. “They keep asking their teachers
whether they will continue coming to the area if the school is demolished.”

Friday, 27 October 2017

For some reason Britain First keeps emailing me the latest escapades of their leaders, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen. For some reason they think I am a supporter!

It’s only exceptionally that I
put up a fundraising appeal on this blog.
It has to be an especially deserving cause. When the desperate plea from Golding and
Fransen arrived in my Inbox I was particularly moved. Both of these individuals are, it would
appear, on the run from the British Police after having absconded rather than
stick to bail conditions that prevent them from harassing people.

For some reason they keep writing
to me. I did unsubscribe a few months
ago but they keep writing to me to ask for more cash which is why I am turning
to you dear reader. Why have I been
resubscribed? I suspect it is dirty
tricks from one Jonathan Hoffman whose best friend is Britain First’s ‘Intelligence’
Chief Paul Besser. Both like to picket
Palestinian and other meetings on the grounds of ‘anti-Semitism’.

I guess it’s kind of flattering
to be told that they need me, even if they offer me the alternative of signing
up or do nothing. At least, it would
seem they take Jews!

Dig deep for these two neo-Nazi nuts. You know they’re worth it.

Dear Tony,I must admit, Britain First is in deep trouble.For four weeks, Deputy Leader Jayda Fransen and I were literally “on the run” across Europe, unable to return to the UK because we would have been arrested at British border control and sent to prison.After managing
(against the odds and in disguise) to get back into the UK via a route
with no passport control, we were picked up at a Scottish port and
driven down to England where we "laid low" for 24 hours.Deputy Leader Jayda Fransen was a guest speaker at the “Justice for Chelsey” protest in Sunderland the following day.With a team of
security officers surrounding her, Jayda managed to smuggle herself into
the crowd who marched her to a rally point and handed her a microphone
so that she could speak about the injustice Chelsey Wright has suffered.Over a hundred police officers rushed and surrounded the protesters, who linked arms to stop the police getting to Jayda!But the bully boy coppers stormed the crowd of men, women and children, determined to apprehend Jayda.After seeing the
police knocking over old ladies and manhandling fully grown men, and
after they threatened to use CS gas on the crowd, Jayda decided to give
herself up to avoid anyone getting hurt!It was a disgraceful sight, watching an army of police bullies literally attacking a crowd of peaceful protesters!The police thugs even choked a dog that Jayda had been pictured with during the protest.Jayda was led off
and locked up for two nights in a stinking, rotten police cell, with
nothing but four walls to keep her company!Whilst Jayda was in
custody, Sunderland police station received numerous calls from Kent
Police demanding that Jayda be transported down to Kent where she would
have to spend 100 days in prison on remand waiting for her trial! But Northumbrian police ignored their demands and refused to transport Jayda to any court outside of their jurisdiction.Come
Monday morning, Jayda found herself cuffed in the back of a meatwagon
and led into the dock at South Tyneside Magistrates court, with Kent
Police still pressuring the court to remand her in prison.By a stroke of divine luck, the Magistrates told Kent Police to take a running jump and they released Jayda from custody!Jayda then received a hero’s welcome in Sunderland and Kent Police skulked off to lick their wounds.The following day, both Jayda and I were in the dock again, this time accused of “harassing” a gang of convicted migrant child rapists in Kent.Kent
Police, now angry that their plan to lock up Jayda had failed, tried to
throw both of us in prison on remand, but to his credit the judge told
them to sod off!The judge fixed a date for our three-day trial and released us from custody to meet the national press who were waiting outside.Make no mistake: The establishment and their police stormtroopers are determined to destroy our movement!Only your support can scupper their evil plans and stop Jayda and I going to prison after our trial for “harassing Muslim gang rapists”.Britain First is being financially drained by the constant and relentless court, solicitor and legal costs incurred throughout this incessant harassment!This is part of their plan: Lock us up and drain all of our resources so that the Britain First movement ceases to exist!But, they underestimate our British bulldog spirit and unwillingness to buckle in the face of their diabolical schemes.We are British Lions, and we will not surrender or cave in, ever!Can Jayda and I depend on your unwavering support as we battle the forces of evil that are destroying our nation?Will you give us your most unshakeable backing during this dark and troublesome period?We depend on you Tony, there is no one else we can turn to!Please send your most generous financial gift as fast as you can - we need to keep the wheels turning on our legal fightback: