Occupy activists around the nation claim that their movement is a peaceful one. However, details in police reports and provided by police sources demonstrate a pattern of lawlessness–including violent crime–at Occupy protests throughout theUnited States.

Sources tell Breitbart.com that there have been more than 1,050 arrests inNew York Cityalone, involving a variety of crimes from sexual assault to disorderly conduct.

Here’s a list of the ten worst crimes allegedly committed at Occupy demonstrations across the country:

NEW YORK, NY: A 26-year old was arrested today for an alleged sexual assault upon an 18-year old female that took place on October 24 inZuccottiPark, where the Occupy Wall Street protest is based. NYPD Police sources said that detectives are investigating a separate incident involving a possible rape.

BOSTON, MA: On October 21, a 34-year old man and a 31-year old woman were arrested for allegedly trying to sell heroin in theTentCity area of Occupy Boston. The two suspects were reportedly living there with a child. Upon arrest, Brown told officers he had moved intoTentCity three weeks prior, and had joined the Occupy Boston movement.

MANCHESTER, NH: A 23-year old woman was charged with felony prostitution for trying to solicit a 16-year old girl she met inVictoryPark during the Occupy Manchester demonstrations. She also allegedly tried, through the Internet, to arrange a liaison for the minor with a man who was actually an undercover police officer.

MADISON, WI: An incident involving public masturbation allegedly occurred at the Occupy Madison protest result. The allegation was raised by a public official during a City Council meeting after complaints came from nearby employees, and although a complaint was not filed with police, the city has denied an application by the movement to renew its permit as a result.

NEW YORK, NY: On October 28, a 31-year old man allegedly threatened a Fox News Channel 5 reporter. The suspect was arrested at the corner ofTrinity Place andCedar Street, and has been charged with Grand Larceny, Menacing, Harassment and Criminal Possession of a Weapon.

DALLAS, TX: A convicted sex offender participating in the Occupy Dallas demonstrations was arrested last week after allegedly sexually assaulting a 14-year old girl who was staying in the protestors’ encampment. The girl, who was a runaway fromGarland, told investigators she had sex with the suspect after she had told him that she was 19 years old.

CLEVELAND, OH: Police are investigating an alleged rape that occurred against a 19-year old female student with a disability. The alleged rape occurred after the young woman was reportedly told to share a tent with an unknown person due to a shortage of tents.

NEW YORK, NY: On October 24, three suspects approached a 24-year old female victim and allegedly threatened to kill her for filing a complaint with the NYPD that resulted in their friend’s arrest.New York police officers are searching for three individuals who match this description:

1) A black male 16-18 years old, 5′5″, with a thin build. He was last seen wearing a brown hat with a white shirt that had the words “StoneHarbor” printed on the front.

2) A black male 18-20 years old, 5′9″, with a thin build and dreadlocks with red streaks. He was last seen wearing a black leather coat and red pants.

3) A black male 18-20 years old, 5′8″, with a medium build with black hair and black beard. He was last seen wearing a black hooded sweatshirt.

NEW YORK, NY: On November 1, an unidentified 24-year-old man was arrested for Assault on a Police Officer. Earlier, on October 12, a 38-year old man was charged with Assault on a Police Officer, Resisting Arrest and Obstructing Governmental Administration.

NEW YORK, NY: On October 11, a 27-year old man was charged with “Sex Abuse 3” for allegedly committing an offense against a victim sleeping in a sleeping bag inNew York City’sZucottiPark.

Federal agents yesterday joined the hunt to find out if Corzine’s MF Global mishandled hundreds of millions in client accounts that went missing — at least briefly — just before the broker-dealer filed for bankruptcy.

The FBI launched a preliminary probe that could lead to a criminal investigation, joining an army of regulators poring over the embattled firm’s books, according to sources.

MF is already being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and other federal agencies after shocking allegations that it mingled clients’ dough with the firm’s money — a major no-no on Wall Street.

GOTCHA! MF Global’s Jon Corzine — including Gary Gensler, a former Goldman colleague and head of the CFTC — is being called out by regulators for failing to keep MF funds and customer accounts separate.

An FBI probe would cap a treacherous several days for formerNew Jersey governor Corzine, who is battling questions over his management of the once-staid broker-dealer.

Regulatory agencies have descended on the firm to uncover the details of a possible $700 million cash shortfall and whether the firm’s execs dipped into funds explicitly designated for clients.

“To the best knowledge of management, there is no shortfall,” Ziman said.

But the more alarming issue is that MF brass copped to tapping clients’ money as the firm’s financial woes mounted.

“This whole thing stinks,” said Jon Najarian, co-founder of Optionmonster.com. “There are so many checks and inevitable audits of how you checked and what your procedures are, that it is extremely strange.”

The idea behind keeping client money separate from the firm’s is to guard against clients losing their money because of the company’s gambles.

Yesterday, the Chicago-based exchange CME Group’s CEO Craig Donohue said the exchange “determined that MF Global is not in compliance with CFTC and CME customer segregation requirements.”

“While we are unable to determine the precise scope of the firm’s violation at this time, we are investigating the circumstances of the firm’s failure,” Donohue said during a conference call to discuss the company’s third-quarter results.

In addition to the FBI, the SEC and the CME Group, the Commodity Futures trading Commission has also launched a probe into the firm’s conduct.

On Monday, the Securities Investor Protection Corp. filed a lawsuit against MF Global, demanding that the brokerage arm, which has not filed for bankruptcy, be put through a liquidation to ensure that clients get all of their money.

Corzine, a former Goldman Sachs co-CEO, ran the gold-plated firm for five years before being ousted in a power struggle with Henry Paulson in 1999.

Humbling days may be ahead for Corzine as he confronts former Goldman banker alums like Gary Gensler, who now runs the CFTC.

Common Sense is something that we all are born with, but often forget to use it. I would compare having common sense and not using this God given gift, too having a lifejacket aboard the Titanic, yet refusing to put it on. We should challenge our Congress to use reasonable thinking when they pass laws. We should demand that they use logic when dealing with Terrorist, and corruption in the government.

The White House has become a symbol of corruption with the American people, and I believe that taxpayers are sick of it. Just Look at how some of our Politicians in Congress has sided with theOccupy Wall Streetcrowd. This is nothing more than Woodstock Resurrected all over again.

Barack Obama and the entire White House staff have become nothing more than a ban of terrorist leaders. What I mean by that is they have decided if congress or the senate disagrees with a policy that they want implemented. They simply use the Executive order trump card in order to ram policies down the American people’s throat.

Whatever happened to common sense with the leaders that we the people have elected in this country? We have no Winston Churchill’s, or Douglas Macarthur’s leading us. When terrorist attack us now we apologize for being attacked. Let’s look at some quotes from Macarthur and Churchill that shows true leadership.

Macarthur said “It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.” He also said “It is part of the general pattern of misguided policy that our country is now geared to an arms economy which was bred in an artificially induced psychosis of war hysteria and nurtured upon an incessant propaganda of fear.”

Winston Churchill once said “Battles are won by slaughter and maneuver. The greater the general, the more he contributes in maneuver, the less he demands in slaughter.”

In this book I want the common man or woman to know that even if you are not Churchill or Macarthur you can still be a leader. You can use the common sense that God Almighty has placed in every individual. The book deals with every day issues that the working man or woman must endure. We must stop being political correct and simple speak the truth in love.

What I would like to bring to your attention in this book is common sense thinking that will expose corruption in the work place, in the grocery store, in Congress, in the White House, and all media outlets. When terrorist attack our country we should fight to win. When media is being bias we should expose their corruption. We should hold love ones and so-called leaders accountable when they lie to our face. We should call every last one of these people to the carpet. We should inform the “sheep” that you are allergic to all irrational thinking. Notify all irrational thinkers that there is no antidote for illogical theories.

The newest poll of Republicans and independents who lean to the GOP side of the fence shows that businessman Herman Cain continues to control the top spot, but it also uncovers trends that the party should be watching as the process of attrition begins to impact the field of candidates.

The WND/Wenzel Poll by Wenzel Strategies was conducted by telephone Oct. 22-25 and carries a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.

The survey indicates Cain is favored to be the party’s presidential candidate by 27.1 percent, while former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is second at 17.9 percent. Third is Texas Congressman Ron Paul with 11.8 percent.

But actually in second place is the undecided column, comprising more than one in five of the respondents, meaning there could be significant changes in the field before the 2012 nominee is chosen.

Cain leads but is slowly coming back to the field after a meteoric rise following a straw poll victory inFlorida,” said Fritz Wenzel, of Wenzel Strategies, in his analysis of the GOP side of the campaign.

“Cain is now in a position familiar to other candidates, including Congresswoman Michele Bachmann and Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who saw a spike in support but who were unable to sustain that support. Cain has just recently come under close scrutiny and has made some public misstatements and mistakes. Meanwhile, both Romney and Paul, both experienced presidential candidates, have maintained solid bases of support,” he said.

Wenzel said that two of three Republican voters say they are satisfied with the field, while some 30 percent are dissatisfied. A total of 44 percent said they would like to see a new candidate enter the competition, reflecting a continued uncertainty.

“What is going on here is that the two now well-known camps inside the Republican Party are slightly shifting away from the Romney camp and toward the Anybody-But-Romney camp. The problem for every other candidate right now is that they are sharing the anti-Romney support, and it appears they will continue to do so until the actual voting begins and their money runs out,” Wenzel said.

“This is going to be a real battle of attrition, as Romney will try to lock up the nomination while there are still many opponents in the race. If he is unable to do so, his campaign will begin losing air like a leaky bicycle tire. Eventually he will go flat, and someone else will win the race,” Wenzel said.

Senate Democrats will try to pass President Obama’s $60 billion infrastructure bill next week, despite the past opposition of a powerful Democratic chairwoman to a major component of the legislation.

The bill includes $10 billion for a national infrastructure bank, even though Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said last year she would “never” support such a proposal.

Boxer’s committee has jurisdiction over transportation and infrastructure issues. She is working with Sen. James Inhofe (Okla.), the panel’s ranking Republican, on a two-year, $109 billion surface transportation authorization bill.

Boxer spokeswoman Mary Kerr said her boss has recently expressed support for an infrastructure bank.

She pointed to a July statement in which Boxer voiced support but cautioned that the bank should not substitute for core federal transportation programs.

“Yes, we want [an] infrastructure bank; we love it; it is great. That is not the core program. But we should build support for it, but it is not the core program,” Boxer said at a committee hearing, according to a transcript provided by the panel.

Boxer is one of two Democrats who in the past have criticized the policy components of the bill, the second installment of Obama’s jobs plan.

Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) opposed a similar infrastructure-heavy stimulus proposal last year when he was in the midst of one of the nation’s toughest Senate races. Bennet says he won’t block bringing the bill to the floor, but he’s not making any commitment to support its passage.

Boxer urged a senior administration official last year to improve the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) instead of creating a new federal bureaucracy by setting up an infrastructure bank.

“I’m just telling you now, this is really important. You may not have the support for an infrastructure bank in other committees,” Boxer told Roy Kienitz, Transportation undersecretary for policy.

“I don’t even know about in this committee,” Boxer said. “But in other committees you may not have it and so you need to be open to using your other tools, such as TIFIA, and making it function more like an infrastructure bank.”

Boxer expressed concern that an infrastructure bank could muddle transportation funds with general Treasury funds.

“My experience is when the funds go back to the general Treasury, then they don’t specifically get used for transportation,” she said. “That’s why I like the highway trust fund.”

Kienitz said the administration envisioned the congressional Appropriations committees would make regular allocations to fund the bank.

Senate Republican aides said Boxer’s support for the bill is lukewarm because it competes with her bipartisan proposal to fund transportation programs.

Reid told reporters last week that the jobs bill slated for floor action would not leech political support from Boxer’s legislation.

“We have an unlimited need in this country, literally unlimited need in this country for infrastructure improvement and development,” Reid said.

“And that bill is for a two-year period of time,” he said of Boxer’s legislation, contrasting it to the upcoming jobs bill. “This is a shot in the arm for the economy right now.”

Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.), chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, has opposed a national infrastructure bank as an expensive and time-consuming expansion of bureaucracy.

TheAmerican Roadand Transportation Builders Association supports the infrastructure bank but believes it will make only a modest contribution to the nation’s transportation needs.

Dave Bauer, vice president of government relations at the group, said there’s no guarantee that infrastructure bank funds would be used for transportation projects, as opposed to being spent on school, waterway or Internet broadband projects.

“From a transportation standpoint, the infrastructure bank can certainly help, but there’s no guarantee the funds or a portion of the funds will be used for transportation, and it is in no way a substitute for the core federal surface transportation programs,” he said.

Bauer noted that public-private projects funded by the bank would need a way to recoup costs to pay off private investors. He said transportation projects funded by the bank would likely include tolls to provide future revenue.

Bennet will also have to reconcile his past opposition to a central component of the jobs package. Last year, during his reelection campaign, Bennet pledged to oppose a $50 billion infrastructure package Obama recommended to spur economic growth.

“I will not support additional spending in a second stimulus package,” Bennet said at the time, according to the Denver Post.

Other Democrats, including Missouri Senate candidate Robin Carnahan and former Sen. Evan Bayh (Ind.), criticized the proposal at the time.

An aide to Bennet said it would be wrong to draw any correlation between last year’s proposal and the infrastructure installment of Obama’s new jobs plan.

The aide said Bennet opposed last year’s plan because there were still unspent funds provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

The aide said Bennet would vote to begin debating the $60 billion jobs bill, but declined to say whether his boss would support final passage.

JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision to execute a 1,000-for-1 prisoner exchange last week despite his frequently voiced opposition to such lopsided deals is seen by several Israeli military commentators as an effort to “clear the deck” before possibly undertaking an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Released Israeli soldier Gilad Schalit (second from right) walks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left), Defense Minister Ehud Barak (left) and Israeli Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz at the Tel Nof Air base in southernIsraelon Oct. 18, 2011. Looking thin, weary and dazed, Schalit returned home Tuesday from more than five years of captivity in the Gaza Strip in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners whose joyful families greeted them with massive celebrations. (Associated Press/Defense Ministry)

The Islamic republic has not been a top agenda item since the outbreak of the Arab Spring. Yet Iran’s nuclear program, which Western nations believe is geared for making an atomic bomb, has remained a key concern, despiteTehran’s denials that it is seeking to build a nuclear weapon.

According to Israeli media reports, a shift in the Israeli government’s views on Iran might have prompted Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s Middle East visit in April: His main mission was to pass on a warning from President Obama against any unilateral attack on Iran.

At a press conference with Mr. Barak in April, Mr. Panettastressed that any steps against Iran’s nuclear program must be taken in coordination with the international community.

This week, Jerusalem Post military correspondent Yakov Katz wrote that, with the Schalit chapter behind it, “Israelcan now move forward to deal with some of the other strategic problems it faces in the region, such as Iran’s nuclear program.” Had Israelfirst attacked Iran, Hamas‘ patron, it would have endangered the Schalit deal, Mr. Katz said.

Writing in Yediot Achronot, Alex Fishman said that for Mr. Netanyahu, who built a political career as a warrior on terror, the Schalit deal was a very courageous step, particularly in view of an estimate by Israel’s security services that 60 percent of Palestinians who are released in such exchanges return to terror.

“He took a risk in a certain area and thereby focused all our attention on much more troubling fronts — in distant Iranand in the Arab revolutions around us,” Mr. Fishman wrote. To deal with these problems, national consensus is necessary and the freeing of Gilad Shalit went far toward achieving that.

Although the prime minister failed to make any enduring mark on history during his previous term or so far during his present term, Mr. Netanyahu may see Iran as an opportunity to achieve his Churchillian moment, Mr. Oren wrote. “The day is not far off, Netanyahu believes, when Churchill will emerge from him.”

JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision to execute a 1,000-for-1 prisoner exchange last week despite his frequently voiced opposition to such lopsided deals is seen by several Israeli military commentators as an effort to “clear the deck” before possibly undertaking an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Israeli soldier Gilad Schalit (second from right) walks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left), Defense Minister Ehud Barak (left) and Israeli Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz at the Tel Nof Air base in southernIsraelon Oct. 18, 2011. Looking thin, weary and dazed, Schalit returned home Tuesday from more than five years of captivity in the Gaza Strip in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners whose joyful families greeted them with massive celebrations. (Associated Press/Defense Ministry)

The Islamic republic has not been a top agenda item since the outbreak of the Arab Spring. Yet Iran’s nuclear program, which Western nations believe is geared for making an atomic bomb, has remained a key concern, despiteTehran’s denials that it is seeking to build a nuclear weapon.

According to Israeli media reports, a shift in the Israeli government’s views on Iran might have prompted Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s Middle East visit in April: His main mission was to pass on a warning from President Obama against any unilateral attack on Iran.

At a press conference with Mr. Barak in April, Mr. Panettastressed that any steps against Iran’s nuclear program must be taken in coordination with the international community.

This week, Jerusalem Post military correspondent Yakov Katz wrote that, with the Schalit chapter behind it, “Israelcan now move forward to deal with some of the other strategic problems it faces in the region, such as Iran’s nuclear program.” Had Israelfirst attacked Iran, Hamas‘ patron, it would have endangered the Schalit deal, Mr. Katz said.

Writing in Yediot Achronot, Alex Fishman said that for Mr. Netanyahu, who built a political career as a warrior on terror, the Schalit deal was a very courageous step, particularly in view of an estimate by Israel’s security services that 60 percent of Palestinians who are released in such exchanges return to terror.

“He took a risk in a certain area and thereby focused all our attention on much more troubling fronts — in distant Iranand in the Arab revolutions around us,” Mr. Fishman wrote. To deal with these problems, national consensus is necessary and the freeing of Gilad Shalit went far toward achieving that.

Although the prime minister failed to make any enduring mark on history during his previous term or so far during his present term, Mr. Netanyahu may see Iran as an opportunity to achieve his Churchillian moment, Mr. Oren wrote. “The day is not far off, Netanyahu believes, when Churchill will emerge from him.”