CANADIAN DEMONYMS.

I’m quite fond of demonyms (I have dictionaries of them for Spanish and Russian, and my Petit Larousse gives them for French), so I was pleased to find a list of them for Canadian localites (linked at Wordorigins.org). Most of them are fairly bland (a person from Aylmer is an Aylmerite, one from Baddeck is a Baddecker), but there are pleasing exceptions: someone from Arviat is an Arviarmiut, and an inhabitant of Barkmere is a Bark Laker. (I note without comment that someone from Bolton-Est, Quebec, is said to be an East Boltoner.)

Apparently not everyone is happy about the list – some groups of NFLD Townies seem to be fighting for the demonym. I saw a St. Johnser (who wishes to be called a Townie) tweet about it just the other day.
Nice to see it picked up here.

The least intuitive one that ever applied to me (not presently) is “Haligonian” for an inhabitant of Halifax, Nova Scotia. named after a similar place in England. No data on what inhabitants of the English place call themselves.

I’ve run across some interesting demonyms in and around New Orleans. People from Chalmette, just outside of New Orleans, are often known as Chalmatians. Residents of Violet, Louisiana, somewhat farther out, are sometimes referred to as Violations.

@Bruce – The somewhat forced demonym for the good people of Halifax, West Yorkshire is “Halifaxian” which probably has just as much merit and as facetious as my own comical suggestion of “Halifaxi”. To be honest you’d just designate an inhabitant of Halifax as a Yorkshireman or woman, most of these demonyms seem pretty fallacious; apparently according to some website I’m a “North Anglian” …hmmm, yeah h’okay?

@Paul Clapham: True, -miut is plural. But for the singular, I’ve seen either -miutaq or -miuq.
(-mik is a case form, sometimes called “accusative”. Many of the hits for “Nunavummik” are actually Greenlandic, another dialect or form of the Inuit language. Some forms of the language termed “Inuktitut” use “Nunavunmik” instead.)
@Barry Alpher: So that’s where it came from! Quite likely – I’ve found both “uiviititut” and “uiguititut” for the French language, and the Inuktitut Living Dictionary has “uiguit” or “uiguirmiuq” for “the French” and “French [presumably as in ‘Frenchman’, singular]”, respectively.

I read once about the occasionally strange demonyms used in France. Since marie-lucie hasn’t chipped in, I will boldly make a clueless contribution. “Demonyms” are called gentilés or noms ethniques. I found a site with 36752 (!) noms des habitants des communes françaises. Unfortunately, the peculiar ones are buried beneath the communal masses.

Here on Haida Guaii (west of Canada) those of us who aren’t Haida are Guaiians (sp. in flux), in other words Islanders. The third name of this archipelago, the Misty Isles (as they have been for several days now) hasn’t yielded an demonym yet. Mistyislan? Hardly. Anyway, we’re only Canadian when they want our vote or taxes.

People from Massachusetts are jocularly termed ‘Massholes’. And I’ve frequently heard the term ‘Mainerd’ for residents of Maine. In Alaska and apparently also in Oregon and Washington, the deprecatory term for residents of California is ‘Californicator’.
Southeast Alaskans are sometimes called ‘Southeasterners’. I’ve also heard the term ‘Amphibian’ used, which is just making fun of the wet weather: “Though most of the state votes Republican, the Amphibian vote is tilted toward the other end of the spectrum.” Cordova and Valdez are equally wet, so this is somewhat unfair. BTW, Valdez is /vælˈdiz/, not /vælˈdɛz/, which the world learned about after the oil spill.
People from Wrangell are Wrangellites, and the condition of living in Wrangell is called ‘Wrangellitis’.
The -er suffix is particularly productive for Southeast Alaskan towns. ‘Ketchikaner’, ‘Petersburger’, ‘Klawocker’, ‘Klukwaner’, ‘Angooner’, ‘Pelicaner’, ‘Yakutater’, ‘Hydaburger’, etc. Sitka people are ‘Sitkans’, Hoonah people are ‘Hoonahns’, and Juneau people are the rather disappointing ‘Juneauites’. Unrelatedly, the joke name for the Tlingit village of Hoonah is ‘Hoonahlulu’. (Hoonah is from Tlingit Xunaa, itself from xoon-niyaa ‘north.wind-direction’.)

A Cork native is a Corkonian whether he comes from city or county, but the word Dubliner refers to urbanites only.

In my experience, tis mostly people from the city call themselves Corkonians. The rest are Corkmen and Corkwomen. “The Kerryman” sells an edition over the county bounds called “The Corkmen”.
Urban Dublin takes up so much of the county there can be very few Dublinmen who’re not Dubliners.
Someone from Wicklow is a Wicklovian, but should really be a Viclovian.
Wikifactoid: Residents of West Kent, those living west / north of the River Medway, are called ‘Kentish Men’, as opposed to residents of East Kent, who are known as ‘Men of Kent’.

As a native of Minnesota, I was thought it was pretty funny when I heard a fellow Minnesotan referred to as a “Minnepoppan.”
[For those who don’t get it:
“Minnesota” spoken sounds like”Minnesoda” and in Minnesota people say pop instead of soda, so we get “Minnepop”]

Considering what a large number of demonyms there are in France (compared with a much smaller and blander list for England) I would have expected to see more from Quebec than there are.
Hmm. I typed “Quebec”, which was immediately displayed as “Québec”. That’s something that drives me nuts when I find myself struggling with a Microsoft product (as rarely as I can get away with), which always thinks it knows better than I do what I want to write. However, no Microsoft products were knowingly used in preparing this comment, so the blame must lie elsewhere.

“Now that it’s Ndjamena, they are just Ndjamenois.’
There’s you some de-colonialization, right there. I suppose it beats language riots.
“Tukwila – Mockingbird
I laughed.”
For you, dear, anything.
“Minnesota” spoken sounds like “Minnesoda”
Funny – I’ve always heard it pronounced “Mee nay sooo tah”.
I saw a list once, that I failed to keep a copy of, that had regional nicknames for just about everry state and region in Mexico. Someone from the DF was a “Chilango” for instance. There is nothing at all derogatory about these names, and since then a place has opened here that offers “tortas chilangos”.
I wonder what the derivation of ‘chilango” might be. Is it short maybe for “*Tenochtitlango?” Is that even a word in Nahautl?

Re Bolton-Est, http://www.easterntownships.org sez “Once known as Peasley Corner, Bolton Centre and South Bolton merged in 1876 to become East Bolton. Its Francophone residents call themselves Boltonnais and English-speaking residents are known as East Boltoners!” http://www.municipalitedeboltonouest.com/ has a picture of the bilingual signage on the seat of government in “WEST BOLTON OUEST.”

The pronunciation ‘Minnesoda’ is no surprise. Forty-odd years ago I learned that the dialect of the northern tier of States and Canada was Northern North American English. I think this designation is no longer used, or is it?

They left out general terms for Nunavut, Northwest Territories and Medicine Hat.
Michiganian is the other term for people from Michigan. And people in the Lower Peninsula are sometimes called trolls because they live “below the bridge”, the very long bridge connecting the Upper and Lower Peninsulas.

Jim wrote:“I saw a list once, that I failed to keep a copy of, that had regional nicknames for just about everry state and region in Mexico. Someone from the DF was a “Chilango” for instance. There is nothing at all derogatory about these names, and since then a place has opened here that offers “tortas chilangos”.
I wonder what the derivation of ‘chilango” might be. Is it short maybe for “*Tenochtitlango?” Is that even a word in Nahautl?”

My father was from the DF and the explanation I always heard is that “chilango” comes from its people’s love of chile and indeed my father loved to eat chile. He would always have an open can of chipotles en adobo (smoked jalapeños in adobo sauce) next to his plate. This was a long time before they ever became a trendy ingredient among chefs.

I don’t know if “Tenochtitlango” was ever a word but I checked to see what the demonym is for people from Mazatlán and it’s Mazatleco or Mazatleca so I suppose a demonym for people from Tenochtitlán could have been Tenochtitleco or Tenochtitleca however I know I’ve seen the word Tenochca used several times in books and Wiktionary confirms it: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Tenochca

I don’t know the nicknames for every state and region in Mexico but some of the best known are Norteños for Northeners, Tapatíos for people from Guadalajara (in Mexico the Mexican Hat Dance is called el jarabe tapatío, the “jarabe from Guadalajara”, a jarabe is a type of traditional music and dance), and Jarochos for the people from Veracruz.. My mother is from Durango and the nickname for its people is Alacranes because the state is famous for the alacrán, or scorpion, which serves as a state symbol.

About the DF/Mexico City, there are actually two nicknames for its people, “chilangos” and “capitalinos. The way it was explained to me is this: a chilango’s family could’ve been from from somewhere else originally but “capitalinos” are people whose families have always inhabited the Federal District. This was explained to me by a cousin who was very proud of the fact that we’re capitalinos. My father’s old neighborhood was really an old village that got swallowed up by the megalopolis.

Keith,
yes, defeños is another nickname (I forgot about that!) but in my experience chilango and capitalino/capitalina are more common. Capitalino is also used in a more general way with anything related to the capital city but there is definitely a sense in which it’s used specifically for people whose families are originally from there.

SFReader,
well yes, Tenochca is a historical term that appears in textbooks and such and it wouldn’t really be used for a present day inhabitant of Mexico City (unless it was for some special reason) but I brought it up because Jim above was wondering where the word “chilango” came from and if it was somehow related to Tenochtitlán. Also, I always thought tenochca was specifically for someone from Tenochtitlán itself and not Texcoco although I could be wrong.

There is one possible nickname that could be considered derogatory, though. I once asked my father about these nicknames and I asked him what they call the people from Tlaxcala. He said,traidores (traitors). Clearly it was connected to how the Tlaxcaltecas had allied themselves to the Spaniards during the Spanish Conquest. I had never heard my dad (or anyone else, really) say it before or since but a google search for “tlaxcala” and “traidores” together brought up more than 29,000 hits so apparently it’s still an issue for some people.

From what I understand people from Mazā-tlān ‘place of deer’ (mazā-tl ‘deer’) are Mazā-tē-ca-‘. Since chīl-li in Nahuatl is ‘chile pepper’ and -tlān is a locative suffix (according to Launey locative expressions, including the names of places, are not exactly nouns), and tl assimilates to l when following it, and -c(o) is also a locative suffix (seen in Mēxi’-co, Āca-pōl-co, Tzinācan-tepē-c), then if two locative suffixes are allowed, Chīl-lān-co would mean ‘place of chile peppers’.

In Nahuatl, people from Mēxi’-co are Mēxi’-ca-‘ (sg. Mēxi’-ca-tl) and people from Az-tlān (vowel length?) are Az-tē-ca-‘ (sg. Az-tē-ca-tl), you might want to suspect a further historical analysis of -tlān and -tē- (not -tlē-) given Colimecas from Colima(n), and Mich-hua’-c-ān ‘the place of mich-hua’-que-‘ ‘fishermen”.

The least intuitive one that ever applied to me (not presently) is “Haligonian” for an inhabitant of Halifax, Nova Scotia. named after a similar place in England. No data on what inhabitants of the English place call themselves.

They are sometimes called Haligonians too, as far as I know. The adjective originated in England, and was inspired by a popular pseudo-learned etymology of Halifax as ‘holy hair’ (OE hāliġ feax).

There are, by the way, lots of interesting slangy demonyms in Northern England, e.g. Mackem for a person from Sunderland (from the way they pronounce “make them”), and everyone knows who a Geordie is. A Geordie can be a Novocastrian on formal occasions.

George Gibbard wrote:From what I understand people from Mazā-tlān ‘place of deer’ (mazā-tl ‘deer’) are Mazā-tē-ca-’…

I’m sure you’re correct and that was my first guess but the Spanish Wikipedia entry for Mazatlan says it’s residents are called Mazatlecos. There could be a number of reasons for this. I suppose one of them could be to distinguish the residents of the resort city from other people who can also claim to be ,mazatecas. For example, there is an indigenous group in Oaxaca and Puebla that is known as the Mazatecos: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazateco_(etnia)

The language name Ayapaneco, the subject of earlier post, must be from another Nahuatl form in -ē-ca-tl, since -pan is another locative suffix. I think these forms were borrowed into Spanish in the (animate) plural -ē-ca-‘, since -tl normally comes out as Spanish -te. So these would have first referred to groups of people and only secondarily have been made into adjectives and language names. The final -o instead of -a must be to be more masculine in Spanish. I wonder if Chilango could come from *Chilanga.

alacrán ‘scorpion’ is so similar and yet so worryingly different from Arabic al-ʕaqrab ‘the scorpion’ (which has stress on the penultimate syllable).
cf. al-ʔaqrab ‘the closest’ also ‘the agnate (relative within one’s own patrilineal clan)’
according to Holy, the words are pronounced the same in Darfur.

Y, if you’re right, I can’t find a reference to the right Mazatán in Spanish Wikipedia:https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazatán
You’re certainly right that “Some dialects have /t/ corresponding to /tɬ/ in others.” But in dialects without the tl = t merger the place name has tl while the demonym has t, note the example of Tla-xca-l-lān (‘place of tortillas’ where tl has assimilated to preceding l) vs. Tla-xca-l-tē-ca-‘
automatic spell checking changed “demonym” to “demonic” without my noticing it until I proofread.
What’s more interesting is derivation of tla-xca-l-li ‘tortilla’ literally ‘cooked thing’. Given that -xca- is ‘cook’ you might think that tla- is ‘thing’, but no such independent word exists. In fact, in Nahuatl compounds, the head comes second, as in āhuaca-mol-li ‘mole (mol-li) made from avocados (āhuaca-tl)’, so you wouldn’t expect ‘thing’ + ‘cooked’ anyway. In fact tla-xca-l-li is derived from tla-xca ‘s/he cooks something’, cf. qui-xca ‘s/he cooks (it/them, or an overt object may appear in the sentence)’. So the derived object noun is derived from an intransitivized verb, not the simple transitive verb. me-xca-l-li ‘cooked maguey’ (mescal is liquor made from cooked maguey) is derived from me-xca ‘s/he cooks maguey’ (‘maguey’ is me-tl). And Cuāuh-temō-c is not ‘eagle descending’ but ‘descending like an eagle’, from the verb with an incorporated noun cuāuh-temō ‘he descends like an eagle’.

There are at least two places named Mazatlán with an “L” inhabited by Mazatecos in Oxaca: the municipalities of Mazatlán Villa de Flores and San Cristóbal Mazatlán. The region where the Mazateco language is traditionally spoken is (according to Spanish Wikipedia) called “la Mazateca” which consists of a mountainous area called the Sierra Mazateca (or Sierra de Huautla) and is divided into the Mazateca Alta (Upper Mazateca) an the Mazateca Baja (Lower Mazateca).

Compare this to the regions inhabited by the Pimas in Sonora and Arizona known in colonial times as the Pimería Alta and the Pimería Baja. Compare this also to another region in Oaxaca known as La Mixteca (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Mixteca) as well as the region known as La Huasteca, a region famous among Mexicans because it straddles several states and is the homeland of a well-known style of folk music, the son husasteco.

GG, thank you for all the Mexican language details. (You too, Pancho).

GW, I think that GG meant that the only word which resembles “alacrán”, besides the word for “scorpion”, is the completely unrelated word for “close(st)”.

I think that the Arabic word is most likely the source of “alacrán”. There are not too many consonants that Spanish allows at the end of a word, so, short of adding a vowel to a borrowed word ending in an impossible consonant, it is likely to convert the original final consonant to the one most usually found in that position in the language.

Indeed, the only word-final consonants in Spanish are /l/, /d/, /f/, /s/,and /n/; of these, /f/ is rare, and the others are all subject to dropping in one variety or another, with /s/ rendered as /h/ or zero with laxing of the preceding vowel, and /n/ rendered as nasalization of the preceding vowel. Final consonant clusters are unknown, and even clusters in the syllable coda occur only in loan words, where they too are subject to loss.

“GW, I think that GG meant that the only word which resembles “alacrán”, besides the word for “scorpion”, is the completely unrelated word for “close(st)”.

There is little resemblance to an Arabic speaker. However, there could be a resemblance to English, and maybe Spanish, speakers as we have no glottal stops or pharyngeal fricatives phonemes. Also, we don’t have vowel length distinctions. The first vowel in ‘closest’ is long and the first in ‘scorpion’ is short which is meaningful to an Arabic speaker.

GW, indeed, the point is not what the word sounds like to an Arabic speaker, but how it could be more or less imitated by Spanish speakers who could not reproduce either the foreign consonants or the unforeign one in an unusual position.

Borrowings start with more or less bilingual people adopting a word spoken by foreign speakers and passing it on (usually with some phonetic distortion) to members of their own linguistic community who have hever heard the original and will often distort it further, passing it on, etc until it becomes part of the borrowing language. Many languages are full of foreign words which have been “nativized” and often sound unrecognizable to speakers of the original language: French words in English, English words in Japanese, for instance, among many others.

True — the RAE dictionary lists 23 such words. But all are very rare except reloj ‘clock’ < Old Catalan relotge < Latin horologium < Greek; carcaj ‘quiver’ < French carquois < Byzantine Greek ταρκάσιον < Persian tīrkaš; and boj ‘box, the tree Buxus sempervirens‘ < Catalan boix < Latin. The rest are at a guess Arabic loans. Final /x/ is also silenced by many speakers, who say reló or reló[h] instead. Indeed, I find it surprising that the word is not *reloje; cf. Port relógio, and Wiktionary says it may be a back-formation from the plural relojes.

“GW, indeed, the point is not what the word sounds like to an Arabic speaker, but how it could be more or less imitated by Spanish speakers who could not reproduce either the foreign consonants or the unforeign one in an unusual position.”

So, you are saying the Spaniards noticed the similarity of two different Arabic words – scorpion and closer? How is that relevant to them borrowing the word for scorpion into Spanish? I have no reason to doubt the borrowing. My only comment was related to the alleged similarity between the Arabic words for scorpion and closer. I also am aware that Spanish has many Arabic loans – I think I have read that something on the order of 10-25% of Spanish lexicon is borrowed from Arabic.

Pancho, you’re right. The Mazatán I saw is on the coast in Chiapas, near the Guatemala border. Mazateco is spoken in the mountains of Oaxaca.

For lack of a better suggestion, I still suspect the name is from some Mazatán which may be by now forgotten. I don’t have handy a map or other data to show whether Nahuatl with -t- is or was spoken in Oaxaca, though the Mazatláns you mention argue against it.

Y, whether the place is named Mazatán or Mazatlán I think the traditional demonym would probably be “mazateca” or “mazateco” either way. It’s the pattern that I’ve noticed for these things. It seems like”mazatleco” for Mazatlán, Sinaloa is an exception to that.

…the homeland of a well-known style of folk music, the son husasteco.

Oops. I meant to write, ” the homeland of a well-known style of folk music, the son huasteco“. H-u-a-s-t-e-c-o.

I wasn’t suggesting most Arabic speakers are confused about ‘scorpion’ vs. ‘closer’, or that it’s relevant to Spanish, I just thought I would throw it in as a fun minimal pair. Which it is — the first vowel in the elative ʔafʕalu is not long. In fact the only time a long vowel can precede a cluster in Classical Arabic is ā before a geminate, as in ħājjun ‘pilgrimage’, jāddatun ‘road’ (also in pl. jawāddu). In vernaculars, long vowel + cluster results from syncope; in some dialects e.g. Cairo, this stage was followed by vowel shortening before a cluster (not counting one across word boundaries): hiyya ʕarfa ‘she knows’ < Classical hiya ʕārifah.

GW: So, you are saying the Spaniards noticed the similarity of two different Arabic words – scorpion and closer?

Whether they did or not has indeed nothing to do with their borrowing of the word for ‘scorpion’. I am not sure why GG mentioned the word for ‘closer’, but perhaps he meant to point out that since the two words are pronounced the same in Darfur, where other languages are spoken besides Arabic, it shows that the Arabic consonants could be confused by (presumably) non-native or dialectal speakers, so by the same token Spanish speakers could also have borrowed a word with their own consonants instead of the Arabic ones. If GG comes back he might clarify.

I was thinking, in Classical Arabic ū probably can occur before a geminate in passive perfect forms of a measure III doubled verb, so 1ū22a (but I don’t know any measure III doubled verbs). Meanwhile ī I would think would never occur before a cluster because there happen to be no rules inserting ī after the first consonant.

alif in these forms does not indicate a long vowel but serves as the “seat of the hamza” (glottal stop): إِنْصَرَفَ، أَكتُبُ
Initial ʔā- is written آ with mādda on top: ٌآذَان ʔāðānun ‘ears’ vs. أَذَانٌ ʔaðānun ‘call to prayer’.
Originally alif itself represented a glottal stop and long ā was not written. But then (already in pre-Islamic times) the glottal stop was lost in some dialects, just as it was in the ancestor of all modern dialects I know anything about. Arabic orthography was developed in one of the glottal-stop-less dialects, so e.g. old biʔr بار ‘well’ became bīr and was respelled بير and bu’s ‘evil’ باس became būs and was respelled بوس. In words like raʔs راس > rās ‘head’, alif was reinterpreted as indicating ā, and this spread to other words with ā, though in the Qurʔān, ā still is usually written without alif. Later, in the early Islamic period, it was decided that the orthography should be reformed to indicate the position of the old glottal stop. This is represented by hamza ء, which can have any of ا و ى as its “seat”: رَأْسٌ بِئْرٌ بُؤْسٌ or have no seat, as in ʔanbiyāʔ أَنْبِيَاءُ ‘prophets’ or Dāʔūd دَاءُودُ ‘David’. At the beginning of a word, the seat of hamza is always alif, a survival of the time when alif was the symbol for the glottal stop. Initial ʔā- is a special case, usually mādda is written and hamza is not: ٌآذَان ʔāðānun; in some Qurʔāns though, ʔāðān is written ءَاذَانٌ and, for whatever reason, mādda is instead written before an intervocalic hamza: أَنْبِيَآءُ ʔanbiyāʔu.

I shouldn’t rely on my lying English-hearing ears. I suspect that when I hear stress in the syllable with an alif, I think I hear a long vowel. Also, as you know, the orthography is not helpful either as diacritics are often not fully used outside of religious texts.

Out of curiosity, can you think of any words with an alif in an unstressed syllable?

But, then maybe, I shouldn’t hijack this thread with an extended discussion of Arabic orthography and phonology. My apologies to everyone else who came here for a discussion of Canadian demonyms.

alif in an unstressed syllable:
not representing a long vowel: ʔatakállam(u) ‘I speak’
representing a long vowel: in some dialects, e.g. Cairo, long vowels are shortened when unaccented. For CA, kāfirū́n(a) ‘unbelievers’, tārī́x(un) ‘history’, sāʕídnī ‘help me!’, dáʕā ‘he invited’.

Born in Houston Texas to Mexican parents (father from Chiapas, mother from Guadalajara, hence my combining both demonyms in my username, Chiapas and Tapatío as in from Guadalajara) and raised and educated in Guadalajara, the Mexican demonyms that always amused and fascinated me were: “Hidrocálidos” from Aguascalientes, the literal meaning of the state’s name as many may know being “hot waters” and thus the demonym’s literal meaning hydro = water and cálido = warm; and “Regiomontanos” from the city of Monterrey, Nuevo Leon. And there’s more what with all the interesting native Mexican names of some cities and states in Mexico, I’m sure. Maybe someone can mention others.

And you can support my book habit without even spending money on me by following my Amazon links to do your shopping (if, of course, you like shopping on Amazon); I get a small percentage of every dollar spent while someone is following my referral links, and every month I get a gift certificate that allows me to buy a few books (or, if someone has bought a big-ticket item, even more). You will not only get your purchases, you will get my blessings and a karmic boost!

Favorite rave review, by Teju Cole:
"Evidence that the internet is not as idiotic as it often looks. This site is called Language Hat and it deals with many issues of a linguistic flavor. It's a beacon of attentiveness and crisp thinking, and an excellent substitute for the daily news."

From "commonbeauty"

(Cole's blog circa 2003)

All comments are copyright their original posters. Only messages signed "languagehat" are property of and attributable to languagehat.com. All other messages and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily state or reflect those of languagehat.com. Languagehat.com does not endorse any potential defamatory opinions of readers, and readers should post opinions regarding third parties at their own risk. Languagehat.com reserves the right to alter or delete any questionable material posted on this site.