EU Puts An End To The Open Internet: Link Taxes And Filters Approved By Just 5 Votes

from the a-sad-day-for-the-open-internet dept

Well, it was a nice run while it lasted, but the EU Parliament has just put an end to the open internet. By the incredibly thin margin of just five votes, the Parliament voted against any amendments to the proposal -- which was a necessary step to fixing or deleting Articles 11 and 13. After that, they voted to approve the EU Copyright Directive, including the terrible versions of both Article 11 and 13. This is an inauspicious day and one that the EU will almost certainly come to regret. While we now need to see how each of the member states will implement the actual laws put forth in the Directive (meaning the damage in some states may be more mitigatable than in others), on the whole the EU Copyright Directive requires laws that effectively end the open internet as an open communications medium. Sites that previously allowed content creators to freely publish content will now be forced to make impossible choices: license all content (which is literally impossible), filter all content (expensive and failure-prone), or shut down. Sites that used to send traffic to news sources may now need to reconsider, as doing so will inexplicably require payment.

At best, the EU--for all its complaints about Google and Facebook--has just locked both companies into a dominant position. They can afford this. Others cannot. And, the legacy gatekeepers in the media and entertainment business will quickly pivot to seeking to export this model elsewhere.

The MEPs who voted for this are up for election in two months, and hopefully the EU shows them the door, but in the meantime, today is a sad day for the open internet. I am sure that some will be celebrating on the false belief that this will magically "help artists." It will not. You just handed more power to giant companies, and took it away from creators. In time, one hopes, those who mocked the protesters and activists and actual experts will come to realize just how much they destroyed today.

Re: Re: Re: Re:

I think he runs one of those websites that gives away an ebook on self help or getting rich quick or whatever (the book essentially being just advertising for other products), where you need to give your email address to receive the free copy. Then, he uses the mailing list to upsell to other products.

I saw a lot of these back in the 90s (and don't feel shame in saying that I did fall for it a couple of times). You'd often then receive a deluge of "hey what about this thing" or "don't you know you're missing out on this type emails. He's saying that because the person asked for the "free" think to begin with, his spamming them is OK.

Now, I could be wrong but the information we've been given suggests that he run this type of operation. If so, he's likely lost a lot of potential leads over the years through improved spam filtering, more web savvy users and communication in general moving from email to other platforms.

But, he's seen a pirate copy of his stuff somewhere so we all need to go back to dialup or something.