Nico Sabbi wrote:
> BTW, for years I asked to insert the correct "reply-to" header in this
> *fuckingly broken* mailing list (to send replies to the list rather than
> to the poster), but not a single time I received an answer by His
> Majesty the ML administrator.
> Can someone fix this issue, please? If not, can the admin at least
> explain *why* he/she wants to keep it broken?
> Please, no speculations: just facts.
This is the standard practice on kernel development lists.
See e.g. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
--
Anssi Hannula