Sybarite:Also, bottles of beer and wine were in the trash can; when the man left for work that morning, they were in his fridge.

What an odd choice for vengeance. "Ha, ha! Now you won't have any beer or wine...unless you pick some up at the store."

I'm not saying I know what happened but... if you live with an alcoholic -you may find yourself throwing beer and wine into the trashcan. This might have been her way of reasserting what she believes to be her rights to live there.

What an odd choice for vengeance. "Ha, ha! Now you won't have any beer or wine...unless you pick some up at the store."

I'm not saying I know what happened but... if you live with an alcoholic -you may find yourself throwing beer and wine into the trashcan. This might have been her way of reasserting what she believes to be her rights to live there.

/This article struck a nerve.// Must get locks changed.

Way to reinforce the societal norm that if a woman did something destructive to a man or his property, he probably deserved it or did something to "trigger" her. Legally, she will probably get a slap on the wrist and won't have to pay any restitution.

Well, as long as she sees you pulling up she can still stay 150 feet away.

Sybarite:Also, bottles of beer and wine were in the trash can; when the man left for work that morning, they were in his fridge.

What an odd choice for vengeance. "Ha, ha! Now you won't have any beer or wine...unless you pick some up at the store."

I'm more concerned that the man was aware they were in his fridge in the morning. "Now officer, when I got my beer for my cereal this morning there was still 4 left. Now I'm out. Coincidentarrarrraly I DID have 3 or mabye 4 more beers today, but they were NOT from that pack. They were from my office beer."

mike_d85:Well, as long as she sees you pulling up she can still stay 150 feet away.

Sybarite: Also, bottles of beer and wine were in the trash can; when the man left for work that morning, they were in his fridge.

What an odd choice for vengeance. "Ha, ha! Now you won't have any beer or wine...unless you pick some up at the store."

I'm more concerned that the man was aware they were in his fridge in the morning. "Now officer, when I got my beer for my cereal this morning there was still 4 left. Now I'm out. Coincidentarrarrraly I DID have 3 or mabye 4 more beers today, but they were NOT from that pack. They were from my office beer."

Why would you be concerned about that? I have a few beers in my fridge, and after work, I plan on drinking a couple of them. If I went home and my fridge was devoid of beers, I'd notice that.

Actually, it does do good. She gets in more trouble, since she violated a restraining order. Heck, he may have even been counting on it. Crazy chick destroys some shiat, which insurance will cover, she gets popped for it and then is out of his hair for a long time.

The point of a restraining order isn't really keeping someone away from you. If they were sane enough to stay away, you could probably just ask, you wouldn't need one. It is so when they don't, they can get locked up. It is a crime just to violate one, and any crime you commit in the course of violating one is just that much worse for you.

ramblinwreck:Way to reinforce the societal norm that if a woman did something destructive to a man or his property, he probably deserved it or did something to "trigger" her. Legally, she will probably get a slap on the wrist and won't have to pay any restitution.

sycraft:Actually, it does do good. She gets in more trouble, since she violated a restraining order. Heck, he may have even been counting on it. Crazy chick destroys some shiat, which insurance will cover, she gets popped for it and then is out of his hair for a long time.

The point of a restraining order isn't really keeping someone away from you. If they were sane enough to stay away, you could probably just ask, you wouldn't need one. It is so when they don't, they can get locked up. It is a crime just to violate one, and any crime you commit in the course of violating one is just that much worse for you.

When I got mine, I told the judge I would use force if it was violated and that I was armed.She told my ex to stay the hell away, and promised her there would be trouble for her if she violated it.think she listened?

vudukungfu:sycraft: Actually, it does do good. She gets in more trouble, since she violated a restraining order. Heck, he may have even been counting on it. Crazy chick destroys some shiat, which insurance will cover, she gets popped for it and then is out of his hair for a long time.

The point of a restraining order isn't really keeping someone away from you. If they were sane enough to stay away, you could probably just ask, you wouldn't need one. It is so when they don't, they can get locked up. It is a crime just to violate one, and any crime you commit in the course of violating one is just that much worse for you.

When I got mine, I told the judge I would use force if it was violated and that I was armed.She told my ex to stay the hell away, and promised her there would be trouble for her if she violated it.think she listened?

uncleacid:A DNA test for a house trashing? That police department must have a lot of money.

Probably the easiest way to make an airtight case. Fingerprints and other forensic remnants would get disputed because she used to live there. Neighbors may not have seen anything. The DNA on the freshly drunk bottles would be the "smoking gun."

She's going to get raked over the coals for this. Stupid thing to do, would have been better to play it passive-aggressive like a lot of other women.

Everyone knows that you don't stick your dick in crazy. The problem is, often times, the crazy doesn't make your acquaintance until after you stick your dick in it. What can be a sane, rational person can turn into a rabbit cooking nut job.

On July 11, 2012, a man was granted a restraining order...On July 12, the man returned to his residence to find it had been broken into.She failed to provide contact information for her attorney, so police were able to obtain a court order requiring the woman to submit to a swab.The results of the swab came back March 25...She was arrested May 2...

Carn:Change the farking locks! It aint hard. Or spend the money and call a locksmith.

If the alleged "She B*tch from Hell" wanted to enter no lock change would stop her. He may saved himself broken windows or a door. Smart move would have been to install a house alarm. It wouldn't have stopped her but it sure would draw immediate attention.

boyvoyeur:On July 11, 2012, a man was granted a restraining order...On July 12, the man returned to his residence to find it had been broken into.She failed to provide contact information for her attorney, so police were able to obtain a court order requiring the woman to submit to a swab.The results of the swab came back March 25...She was arrested May 2...

So much for a speedy trial.

Speedy trial doesn't start until the actual arrest. However, not sure that the SOL is for burglary. The crime was committed in 2012 and she was arrested in 2013.

Amusement:Carn: Change the farking locks! It aint hard. Or spend the money and call a locksmith.

If the alleged "She B*tch from Hell" wanted to enter no lock change would stop her. He may saved himself broken windows or a door. Smart move would have been to install a house alarm. It wouldn't have stopped her but it sure would draw immediate attention.