No, If you pick the closest game, you win. If nobody picks is the closest game, then you win if you pick the winner of the game you felt would be the closest. If nobody does that, then the closest margin.

Example: You picked Rams v Jets to be the closest.
I picked Chicago v San Fran to be the closest.
Tim picked Balt v Pitt to be the closest.

So far the closest games are Balt v Pitt and Cleveland v Dallas. So, unless Chicago b San Fran are closer than 3, he wins.

If Tim didn’t pick Balt v Pitt, then tie-breaker 1 is who wins your matchup? You picked Rams, I picked Chicago. If neither of us got that right, then we go to tie-breaker 2…margin. Right now the margin is 3, you picked 2 and I picked 1…you’d win.

Moot point as of now since Tim picked Balt v Pitt. Unless Chicago v San Fran is closer than 3, he wins.

Hey, it’s actually kinda hard picking these ’cause I don’t want to pick the same ‘ol same ‘ol every week and I like it when it goes to tie-breakers.

Maybe a better example would be if we both picked St. Louis v NYJets but you picked Rams as your tie-breaker but I picked Jets as my tie-breaker. I’d win…which would be a rarity so far this year.