Archive

Now as a firm believer of the “SPITTERS ARE QUITTERS” movement I’ve always felt that Monica Lewinsky should have done some jail time for that BULLSHAT she pulled on my boy Clinton. BUT, hey who am I to judge, however because she got away with doing that foolishness now we have women thinking its acceptable to play around with semen. Look men if a woman is blowing you and you bust in her mouth you look her dead in the eye and make sure she swallows…if she can’t you walk her azz to the bathroom and watch her spit that sh*t in the toilet! Women let’s be real if you can swallow phlegm, buckleys (cough syrup), patron, etc you can swallow some damn semen so cut the BS out already! Anywho, it looks like this woman Dr. Sharon Irons tried to take the shine from Monica Lewinsky…apparently this woman had oral sex with a man and instead of being a trooper and swallowing she found a way to impregnate herself with it!!!! Details below:

“So, a man sued his ex-girlfriend for fraud and emotional distress after she secured a court order demanding he pay child support for their two year-old daughter. The reason? This woman saved his semen after performing oral sex and secretly impregnated herself. No, this is not a new plotline of absurd television show One Tree Hill but actual events that formed the basis of a 2005 legal battle in Illinois.

Although this case is six years old and garnered some media attention at the time, we recently came across it on Professor Jonathan Turley’s blog and couldn’t resist an opportunity to discuss it.

But before we get to the legal issues presented in this case, namely how a man can be ordered to support a child when his sperm was used without his knowledge, the soap opera-esque facts surrounding this situation deserve to be explained in greater detail. Trust us.

It all began when Dr. Sharon Irons (an internist) and Dr. Richard Phillips (a family practitioner) began dating in January 1999. Dr. Irons led Dr. Phillips to believe she was divorced and within a few months, they became engaged. According to Dr. Phillips, the two discussed the possibility of having children and he made clear his intentions: that he did not want children until after they were married and any pre-marital sex would require the use of condoms. Throughout the course of their relationship, they engaged in only three instances of oral sex: they never went “all the way.”

On one of these intimate occasions, Dr. Irons did something rather remarkable: After fellating Dr. Phillips, she held his semen in her mouth (where it was suitable to sustain viability) and then inseminated herself with it. She did not inform Dr. Phillips of her actions.

Dr. Irons also never informed her boyfriend that she was, in fact, still married. Five months into their relationship, she confessed to Dr. Phillips that she was not divorced and he decided to end their relationship.

Fast-forward to November 2000, when, surprise! Dr. Irons slapped her surely stunned ex-boyfriend with court papers to establish paternity and child support for “their” daughter.

Extraordinary they are, indeed. And while Dr. Irons’ act of stashing semen away definitely made for attention-grabbing headlines, the media focused more on the sexy- slash-crazy angle and less on the actual law. We decided to explore the legal claims advanced by the parties and the reasoning behind Dr. Phillips seemingly unjust obligation to support a child whose existence was beyond the realm of expectation.

In his suit, Dr. Phillips alleged the unauthorized use of his semen constituted actionable claims of fraudulent misconception, conversion and intentional infliction of emotional distress. A lower court dismissed these grievances, and he appealed.

The Appellate Court of Illinois found that a fraudulent misconception claim was only available for “economic” wrongs, and so dismissed this claim. (Dr. Phillips was suing for physical and emotional harms he alleged that he’d suffered as a result of Dr. Irons’ actions).

The court next turned its attention to the conversion claim. Conversion is “an unauthorized act that deprives a person of his property permanently or for an indefinite period of time.” The arguments on both sides of the conversion claim are worth noting.

Dr. Phillips argued that his ex-fiancé took his property, his sperm, without his permission to conceive a child. Dr. Irons countered by asserting the sperm was a gift: Dr. Phillips delivered it to her with the intention that she keep it because if he really wanted to retain his semen, he would have put on a condom and “kept its contents”.

The court agreed with Dr. Irons: Dr. Phillips cannot claim he was deprived of his property because he did not intend that the semen be returned.” source

*HARD BLANK STARE*… Y’all know damn well what my first and only question is going to be!!!! WHO IN BABY JESUS NAME DID SHE IMPREGNATE HERSELF!!! JUST HOW! The next thing I need to bring up is … since when is semen considered a got damn gift? This woman had the nerve to tell the courts the sperm was a gift that was delivered to her with the intention to keep it, and if he didn’t want her to have it he should have kept it!!! *lawd baby jesus take me away*…this is some real shat right here! That is some funny shat can you imagine giving your man some buffers and then he busts in your mouth and says “Happy Birthday baby…I gave you the gift of sperm”…LMFAO that is some sh*t I would do….BUT look this isn’t about me! Lets get serious here though!! I think its sad what this woman did…how can you use sperm to impregnate yourself then have the nerve to press charges for child support. I mean if you were woman enough to be deceitful and have the child by yourself then raise that sh*t by yourself. But it looks like Dr. Richard Phillips tried to sue to stop the child support since Dr. Ions was shady about the entire conception…but sadly it looks like he doesn’t have a case!!

“The court stated that Dr. Irons’ conduct in deceitfully engaging in oral sex to procure the sperm necessary to impregnate herself would, according to any reasonable person, be considered “extreme and outrageous” conduct (Ed. Note: well, duh). Considering the nature of Dr. Irons’ actions and Dr. Phillips’ clear expression of not wanting a child out-of-wedlock, the second element of IIED was met. For the actual distress, Dr. Phillips claimed a whole slew of anguish including nausea, loss of appetite, interference with his profession, insomnia and more, which was enough to keep the case alive.

The final decision or current status of the case is unavailable which means that the case is still being litigated or the parties settled.

Regardless, what confused us most about the case was that the child support obligation on behalf of Dr. Phillips was not contested. How could a father be forced to pay child support if the conception of the child was beyond (way, way beyond) a reasonable person’s expectation? The court itself stated that the mother’s actions were “extreme and outrageous”, after all.

The answer? Public policy. In a note for the Drake University Law Review, A Man’s Right to Choose: Searching for Remedies in the Face of Unplanned Fatherhood, author Adrienne D. Gross explained the general policy in law of looking out for a child’s best interest in both child support and paternity statutes. Undisputedly, a child’s best interest is to have the financial support of both biological parents, regardless of their marital status, and according to Ms. Gross, “the child should not suffer from a parent’s indiscretion concerning the events leading to conception.”

Basically, if you father a child and the paternity is established, you are on the hook for child support payments. (A father can sue for IIED, if the mother’s actions in the conception meet the requisite level of crazy, but there is no guarantee he will win.)” source

I feel bad for Dr. Phillips and feel like she should have been let off with this case…lets be for real it’s not like there were having sex and she lied about being on birth control or something … she buffed him off and then used the sperm to impregnate herself. I mean if that isn’t fraud or something then got damnit I don’t know what it!!! Damn this poor man is gonna be traumatized and may never want to get buffed off again…if I was him I would have planted some drugs in Dr. Iron’s home then called the cops on her azz!

As you know I’m a firm believer in the spitters are quitters movement!!!! Now I see why Caucasian girls are so talented in the Team Swallow Back movement it looks like their parents get them started very very early. You can’t blame them though can you lmfao!!!!

“Now I understand that Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise are Scientologists so their understanding and thinking about raising children are very strange, but really your daughter has bachelorette party favors as a snack?

This is something I expect from Supahead…Teach your daughters to gobble the dick early. But, im going to let this slide only because I pray that they are teaching her the difference in male and female anatomy.

Surely there might be better options, however considering that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s daughter/son is confused maybe a play date isn’t the best option.” source