Nathan Ridge wrote:
> [ASIDE]
>
>> Based on this I really have reservations that GSOC is really
>> useful to boost. Also, given Google's coding guidlines,
>> which explicitly proscribe most of boost and most of C++11,
>> I don't see how Google would find boost a match for them.
>
> That's interesting. I can understand C++11, being as it is relatively
> new, but do you know why Google's coding guidelines proscribe
> most of boost?