This blog describes Metatime in the Posthuman experience, drawn from Sir Isaac Newton's secret work on the future end of times, a tract in which he described Histories of Things to Come. His hidden papers on the occult were auctioned to two private buyers in 1936 at Sotheby's, but were not available for public research until the 1990s.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

A trailer has just been released for the 300 sequel, 300: Rise of an Empire (2014). It is based on Frank Miller's graphic novel, Xerxes (2011). Miller presents a clichéed east-versus-west conflict with cultural and racial images which are sure to upset people and generate controversy. Miller's tone aside, it is true that the Persian Wars helped to shape the western cultural memory. Miller's story is more representative of the myth-making of memory around history, than it is about history.

Of course, this is a clear example of Millennial retro-futurism: some part of the ancient world is revived in a hyper-tech-mediafied way to explain modern concerns. The modern frame for this pop culture entertainment originates in rising tensions between Iran and America over nuclear weapons. Check out the subtly-altered mushroom cloud inserted into the ancient-Millennial mashed-up context of the trailer below. Some have argued that rising nuclear interests in Iran are strategically related to the expected decline of the regional importance of the Middle East when oil reserves are depleted there around 2050.

The time frame begins 10 years before 300 [which is set in 480 BCE around the Battle of Thermopylae] and ... starts with
the Battle of Marathon [in 490 BCE], which was killer to draw, by the way, even if it was a lot of work. The lead character is Themistocles, who became warlord of Greece and built their navy. The story is very
different than ’300′ in that it involves Xerxes’ search for godhood. The existence of gods are presupposed in this story and the idea is that he [is] well on his way to godhood by the end of the story. ...

The story will be the same heft as 300 [published in 1998] but it covers a much, much greater span of time — it’s 10 years, not three days. This is a more complex story. The story is so much larger. The Spartans in 300 were being enclosed by the page as the world got smaller. This story has
truly vast subjects. The Athenian naval fleet, for instance, is a massive artistic undertaking and it [was] dwarfed by the Persian fleet, which is also shown in this story. The story has elements of espionage, too, and it’s a sweeping tale with gods and warriors.

King Xerxes of Persia strove for godhood, as conceived and depicted by Frank Miller.

Yes, I suppose it will be seen as provocative, but really to me he is such a pivotal character and in this story I get to explain him so much more fully. I do my best to crawl inside his head rather than have him be this iconic force that simply commands this huge army. There are many scenes with him alone or just with his people. There’s an extended scene set in Persepolis, for instance, where he takes power and there are several scenes where he is going through his transitions and he’s
shown speaking to his mother and his wife and with all of that he becomes that much more interesting as a character.

The film will also focus on the Battle of Artemisium, which took place at the same time as the Battle of Thermopylae (in August-September 480 BCE) and will include the Battle of Salamis (which took place in September 480 BCE). This was the high point of the second Persian invasion of Greece, which saw the Persians capture and overrun Athens, before the Greeks formed an alliance and stormed back to victory in 479 BCE. The Greeks eventually captured Byzantium (modern day Istanbul).

The main sources on the Greco-Persian Wars (499-449 BCE) were the 'father of history,' Herodotus and subsequently, the Athenian scholar Thucydides. Herodotus's account was later criticized: "Plutarch criticised Herodotus in his essay 'On The Malignity of Herodotus,' describing Herodotus as 'Philobarbaros'
(barbarian-lover) for not being pro-Greek enough, which suggests that
Herodotus might actually have done a reasonable job of being even-handed." Plutarch, in his biographies of Themistocles, Aristides and Cimon wrote about this period of conflict, but was writing 600 years after the fact. He cited ancient histories which have not survived. There are no surviving historical accounts written by the Persians.

You can read Herodotus's account for free in English online here (the 1920 Godley translation), and a translated version of the account by Thucydides here.

You can see photos online of the ruins of Xerxes' ancient Persian capital, Persepolis, here.

About Me

Welcome to my blog, dedicated to the aporia, anomie, mysteries, and nervous tensions of the turn of the Millennium. I'm a writer and academic, trained in the field of history. These are my histories of things that define the spirit of our times. This blog also goes beyond historians' visions of the past, and examines how metatime and time are perceived in other media and disciplines, between generations, and in high and pop culture.