About

Sujay Rao Mandavilli was born in India on the 18th of November, 1969, and is the son of an IIT (Indian Institute of Technology) Professor. He is the great great grand son of Hindu philosopher and reformer late Diwan Bahadur J. Venkatanarayana Naidu. (Refer Wikipedia) Sujay has been fascinated with science from an early age and built his first telescope at the age of eleven. He has been interested in the Aryan problem since the 1990’s. He is committed to the healthy growth of science in India and elsewhere. He has worked in different technology firms for twenty years including as a Senior Consultant for IBM for Six years and has executed assignments for different clients across the world in the field of Governance, Risk, Compliance, Process Improvement and Information Security, and in this connection, has travelled to or worked in fourteen different countries.

At age 48, he quit the technology sector completely to focus on fighting dogmas, religious fascism, obscurantism and ideological constructs of all kinds and bring about a scientific and an intellectual awakening in developing counties like India using his own unique methods and approaches, with the hope that this will be a role model for other developing countries as well. He is interested in the ‘Globalization of Science’ i.e. how intellectual multi-polarity can be beneficial to science itself. He is also interested in the ‘Sociology of Science’ i.e. how a proper teaching of science can lead to Social and Intellectual revolutions in regions where such revolutions are long overdue and greatly increase scientific output. He strongly believes that Scientific and Intellectual revolutions are long overdue in developing countries several decades after the end of colonialism and is trying to lay the foundations for such revolutions in his own unique way.

He is the Founder-Director of the Institute for the Study of the Globalisation of Science (Registered as the Globalisation of Science Trust) which is has already started empanelling a group of researchers and scientists to plan its next course of action.

Introducing Anthropological Historiography as an integral component of Twenty-first Century Historiography: The role played by Anthropological Historiography in the attainment of long-term Anthropological goals and objectives

IJISRT (International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology), 2018

This is the last paper in our trilogy on Twenty-first century Historiography and attempts to take the field of Historiography to an altogether new level by interfacing it with different fields of Anthropology and using it to create a scientific and an intellectual awakening.

The relevance of Culture and Personality Studies, National Character Studies, Cultural Determinism and Cultural Diffusion in Twenty-first Century Anthropology: An assessment of their compatibility with Symbiotic models of Socio-cultural change

ELK Asia Pacific Journal of Social studies 2018

This paper reexamines the core tenets of the “Symbiotic School of socio-cultural change”, against the backdrop of schools of thought such as the Culture and Personality School, Cultural Determinism, Cultural Relativism, and diffusionist schools etc and takes the principles of our first paper to new heights.

Syncretism and Acculturation in Ancient India: A new Nine phase acculturation model explaining the process of transfer of power from the Harappans to the Indo-Aryans: Part Two

ICFAI Journal of History and Culture 2010

This paper provides the detailed solution for the ‘Aryan problem’ and all-new methods to reconstruct the languages of the IVC with checks and balances. This paper contains century by century maps explaining how Indian culture evolved.

Alphabetic scripts and other forms of literacy in Post-Harappan India: A logical assessment and inquiry as to the origin and extent of literacy in Post-Harappan India

International Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences 10/2012

This paper deals with literacy in Post-Harappan India and shows using a multi-disciplinary approach why literacy always existed in isolated pockets in post-Harappan India. This paper is a must-read as it pinpoints the origin of Brahmi down to the last century using transparent approaches. Also note how this paper proves our solution for the ‘Aryan problem’: The dates for the introduction of Alphabetic scripts tally with the dates of our acculturation model down to the last century, validating both our model and our approaches to arrive at a date for the origin of Brahmi.

The Demise of the Dravidian, Vedic and Paramunda Indus Hypotheses: A brief explanation as to why these three Hypotheses are no longer tenable

Published directly online in leading research portals in 2013

This paper shows why alternative approaches are not tenable – i.e, the Dravidian, Vedic or Paramunda Hypothesis. This paper reinforces our conclusions reached in earlier papers; very detailed century by century maps are provided in this paper as well.