Search This Blog

IM2 Opinionated is a site that tries to look past the words muttered by our leaders in an attempt to get people to use senses other than their ears. Hopefully this will help people get a true sense of what is going on in their world and the world around them. Although most subjects will be of a serious nature, there will be humor involved as well, because jokes can also shed light on the truth.

Subscribe to this blog

Follow

Statement of Values and Beliefs

Abortion: I have no stance on abortion and I will never take a stance on this matter. It is too inflammatory and I believe that people make poor decisions on leadership based on this issue and many issues of faith in general: Case in point: Too many Americans were duped into believing that George Bush was a God-fearing individual even after he chose to commit troops to a war (Iraq) that was unjustified, immoral and harmful to both nations involved and ultimately, the world. People’s faith-like belief in Bush has put America and the world in a downward spiral of conflict and economic turmoil.

Accountability: Mistakes are made and lessons should be learned from those mistakes, but the first step to learner from one’s mistakes is admitting that the mistake was made in the first place. Those who are unwilling to be held accountable for their decisions, have no place in a leadership capacity. I believe that, whether the war in Iraq was caused by faulty intelligence or not, the fact remains that it was a mistake that has cost over a trillion dollars, the stability of the U.S. economy (and the world’s economy to a certain extent) and worse still, thousands of lives, both American and Iraqi, yet no one seems to be responsible for this war: Someone started it, but no one has apologized for it to date, except maybe Colin Powell (who has stated that he was against it from the outset). Without delving too deeply into my own beliefs about the war, I will simply state that, at the very least, an apology is owed to all of those service men and women who lost their limbs, their sight, their sanity, their sense of security, and their lives in this struggle to force democracy on a country that might have taken their own steps towards freedom, had they been given the opportunity. It is to these individuals and their families that the greatest debt is owed and the most heart-felt apology is warranted.

I, personally, was appalled when George W. Bush came out to proclaim that the lowest point of his presidency was when a rapper (Kanye West) said that he (Bush) didn’t like black people. If our “God Fearing” leaders cannot even concede to the fact that sending young men and women into harms way for no justifiable reason, then what hope do we have as a nation? Lies and denial have taken too great of a toll on our society. It is time to hold some feet to the fire and avoid the complacency that has become far too prevalent in this country and to promote common sense.

I believe that people can tell when something being said is not right. We can’t always tell what it is that is wrong about what is being said, but common sense tells us that something is definitely out or place. Things like the idea that taking money from the poor, elderly, middleclass, teachers, students, fire fighters, policemen, and nurses to give to wealthy individuals and mega corporations (in the form of tax cuts) in hopes that they will in turn give back to the former (in the form of labor) just doesn’t sound right. This is especially the case when it is that group of poor, elderly, middleclass who won’t be able to buy those goods provided by companies, because of the lack of money. Perhaps a better plan would be to give the money to the poor, middleclass and elderly who have to buy the products sold by companies to survive. This, in turn would create a greater demand for products, which leads to the need to hire more people to make the products, or grow the food that they can now afford because they are working.

I know that I might have gone off topic in that last paragraph, but this shows the interrelatedness that exists between all facets of our society. Accountability leads to correcting for past mistakes. Correcting past mistakes leads to a change in ideology that currently supposes that the rich should get all of the money to dowel out as they see fit. A reversal of this train of thought leads to this country helping out those individuals most in need of help, which leads to lifting up the nation from the bottom up. With greater demand for products, companies hire more and have more to put into education. Education leads to innovation, which helps fix the problems of the world.

We’ve tried it the other way: Most of the means in the hands of the few and it seems that every time this route is taken, the world gets thrown into despair. Maybe it’s time to try something new.

Education: Simply put, education is key to the economy. A less educated population is one in which advancement stagnates. Civilization has moved forward, due to innovation and innovation has come about, due in large part to education. Instead of rediscovering the wheel, subsequent generations have been told of the wheels existence and been given the opportunity to not only improve upon its design, but to put a chassis on top of it so the masses could move around more easily. There are of course those who needed no fore knowledge of ideas, equations and theories. They’re called geniuses and even their existence mandates that the pursuit of education continue. The rationale for this viewpoint is as follows: A genius has a great idea on how to desalinate sea water, but is uncertain of the costs and the logistics of implementing such a system. It is at this point that the expertise of people with knowledge of what is truly required to bring a product to market comes into play: It is this peripheral group of accountants, logistic professionals and technicians who know how to assemble equipment to bring the dream of desalinization to fruition. Besides all of this ancillary work, there is the simple matter of the genius being able to communicate their ideas to the rest of us. Perhaps the genius’ assistant is not as smart as the genius, but he or she knows how to convey the genius’ thoughts in a manner that is easily understood by the accountants and fabricators of the project. Perhaps without this educated mediator, the project would not have gone past the genius’ imagination, and the world’s drinking water dilemma continues to plague mankind.

As another example of the usefulness of an educated population, let’s consider the bind in which most states find themselves financially, these days. In a country, where jobs are scarce, those states that can attract the most businesses will succeed, but those successes must be judged not only on the quantity of jobs, but also on the quality of jobs created due to legislative policies. If the state deems hacking funding for education as a means to allow for tax cuts for corporations, than they must only be aspiring to attract companies that only have needs for workers. With an uneducated population, companies need only supply the managerial staff to oversee those who would spend their days performing menial tasks that require little, if any, thought. This is not to say that these types of jobs aren’t necessary, quite the contrary, they are of utmost importance to our economy, but they represent a limit on the diversity of companies willing to move into states that only offer people with limited education. Inversely, those states that support education and offer citizens with higher degrees of learning represent the possibility of innovation. Companies that hope to grow through innovation and competitiveness will flock to those states that offer a greater percentage of individuals with the base knowledge, acquired in colleges and universities that could lead to the “Next Big Idea”. In the state that promotes education, the range of prospective companies is greater than in those that only offer one type of workforce.

U.S. Economy: Stop giving money to banks, and corporations, they know nothing of putting it back into circulation. To save the economy a wiser choice would be to create consumers, so the companies will have someone to sell their products and services to, instead of giving bigger bonuses to executives who seem to have to real sense of what to do with these government handouts. I am not saying that consumers will know what to do with a government windfall such as the ones that big banks, automobile companies and other corporations knew, but they will do one thing that neither the banks, nor any of the corporations did: Consumers will spend that money and part of this spending will be guaranteed, because it will be out of necessity. Those with less to spend have to spend more, if only to survive than those with excess. If only 1% of the economy has half the money, what would they spend that money on? Well, everyone has to eat, including that 1%, but they’re not eating the same amount as the 150 million people who they are wealthier than. Simply put, the 400 richest individuals will eat three meals a day . . . No let’s take it to an extreme. The wealthiest 400 individuals eat ten meals a day, which comes to a grand total of 4000 meals per day. That’s 4000 proteins, 4000 carbs, 4000 fats per day. Now, let’s compare that to the 150 million who have the same amount of money as those 400 wealthiest individuals and let’s even be reasonable on the portions as a way in which to honor the First Lady’s agenda for healthy living. So 150 million people eating three meals a day (not ten) equals 1,500,000,000 meals. That’s 450 million meals; 450 million proteins, 450 million carbs, and 450 million fats. Now, maybe the rich are eating higher priced foods, like the cream of the crop of creamed corned, or carrots encrusted with karats, but it would still take a lot to narrow the gap between 4000 meals and 450,000,000, which amounts to 112,500 times as many meals consumed daily. And that’s with the rich eating more than three times as much as the remaining half of this nation. This concept applies to every single facet of life, because just like the middleclass and the poor, the rich are human beings and human beings all need food, water and shelter to survive.

So, the next time that the government has 700 billion dollars lying around, why not give every individual (including the wealthy) $2000 dollars and let’s see what happens. We already know what happens when we give it to banks and corporations.

Global Economy: Global corporations do not benefit any particular country in the long term. The reason for my belief in this matter is that corporations, no matter where they originate do not serve their country of origin. Perhaps to those who are short-sighted, this may seem untrue, but what country truly controls corporations such as General Electric, Siemens, Carnival Cruise Lines, and Halliburton? All of these companies have countries of origin, and while they profit in the year 2011, their countries of origin flounder on the brink of financial ruin, which has lead to the ruination of the masses in those countries of with which these corporations are supposedly aligned.

While bank executives post record bonuses in the United States, the people of this country go bankrupt. While three wars are waged, the profits of these wars benefit no one except those corporations that sell these, high tech, high dollar weapons.

Is it so beneficial to the United States to have so many manufactured goods, built in other countries by “American” companies only to be shipped to the US to be sold for a profit: A profit that does not garner any taxes from these same corporations? And worse still is the fact that as these companies outsource their jobs to the lowest bidders, wages worldwide are affected: If India builds computers for 10 cents on the dollar, India’s workers make what is possibly a better wage, but one that is less than the amount an American could survive on. The problem arises when there simply are no jobs in America, because they have all gone to India. In this instance, people who have been out of work for one or two years will fight for lower paying jobs, as we saw when McDonald’s announced that it would be hiring 50,000 people nationally. Now, while this is great for McDonalds, it doe not help the recent college grad who is facing years of student loan repayment. It send a signal that college is a waste of time and money, ‘because the only people hiring only require a high school diploma and they’re only paying minimum wage.

So, with the population of the United States desperate to get back to work and willing to take jobs that, not only pay less, but to take them without the promise of health benefits or paid vacation even the ability to pay basic necessities such as rent or mortgages, utility bills, or food. And still, the mantra that these companies want the masses to repeat is “Be happy you’re working.”

In my opinion, at least in America, we should spend a little more on those items that can be bought locally. Avoid the cheap imports when possible, because their long term cost is far greater than their overall value. Let’s not allow the corporations play such a big part in our lives and let’s stop giving them all of our money, because totalitarianism does not sound like anything that we should be a party to, but it does sound like the direction in which this country is heading. Instead of Hilter or Stalin, we are getting corporations, which write most of our legislature these days.

Environment: When our elected officials will not recognize that we have a disaster, such as the one created in the Gulf of Mexico by BP, which demands more attention than it has received, then how are we ever to recognize Climate Change as inevitability? One of the greatest arguments against Climate Change naysayer is the tragedy that has occurred in the Gulf of Mexico and the fact that yet another corporation (BP) is getting away with “murder”. Perhaps murder is too strong of a word to describe the increased number of animal deaths that have occurred in the wake of the Deep Horizon catastrophe. Maybe the livelihoods that have been irrevocably diminished or eliminated don’t have any grave implications for neither the families directly effected by these losses, nor the country that now has to bear the burden of supporting these families that people like, the Governor of Florida, Rick Scott would claim chose poverty. To stay on topic however, let’s examine the world objectively.

For humanity, planet Earth is mostly a closed system. What we have on this planet right now is, more than likely, what we had on this planet one hundred, two hundred, a thousand and maybe even 100 thousand years ago. As, I heard, every drop of water we drink had at some point been filtered through some dinosaurs kidneys and every drop our descendants drink will have met the same fate as well as having been filtered through our kidneys. Disgusting as this may sound it it true, because Earth does not get a fresh source of water, delivered by Evian from Pluto or any of the ice planets. All of the water on Earth has been here for millennia and will be here for many more millennia. The only thing that will change about the water of planet Earth is its quality, which simply put, means, that the more we pollute the less we’ll have to drink. This whole closed system thing holds true for the air we breathe, so the more air we pollute, the less clean air we’ll have for things such as breathing. Now, mankind is quite adaptable, but there is a limit to our adaptability. Perhaps some day, our bodies will be able to utilize carbon dioxide as opposed to oxygen, but maybe that change will take 30 thousand years, while we are changing the atmosphere to match this adaptation in 10 thousand years. We better be able to hold our breath for a long, long time to clear that gap.

Comments

You should read the link below about the Moveon family of organizations, originally stated as a censure of President Clinton.

http://www.moveon.org/about.html

Let 's stipulate to everything you said about creating a third party atmosphere. It doesnt come about by blogging alone, you need organization and "boots on the ground". You cannot just "wave away" what exists. You must change the system in steps or else by revolution. Most of our societal ills could be solved by a sustained push to return to the ideals stated in the preamble to our constitution:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It seems odd to me that all of those Christian activists (from the 80s) who complained so much about backward, demonic lyrics in rock and roll and rap songs don't seem to have an issue with all of the overt advertisements that tell people to be bad. It seems quite hypocritical that they took groups like Judas Priest to court over some muddled message that could only be understood if you played the record backwards, but not said a word about advertisements that openly attempt to influence the public.

Think about this: It is a marketing firms job to get people to believe the message in their commercials and they are advertising bad behavior. It's not their job to possibly influence behavior or maybe get a few people to lean towards whatever product they're peddling. It is their job to get as many people as possible to not only buy the product, but to also buy the implied way of life that their product promises . . . and it works. Otherwise, we would not have lines aroun…

Sheldon Adelson is working on a deal to develop a Las Vegas style gambling center in Spain (called Euro Vegas) where gambling has been banned for moral reasons. He has already built an similar gambling center in Macau (People's Republic of China), which helped Adelson build his wealth of approximately $25 billion dollars. In Macau, his attempts to manipulate the government have drawn scrutiny from federal and Nevada investigators, but this has not deterred him from moving on with his plans for Spain. Besides being an apparent manipulation of desperate people and countries, doesn't this all seem apocalyptic? A man with more money than he, his family or generations of his family could ever spend seeks to accumulate even more wealth. What is the point of his greed? If Adelson showed an inordinate amount of philanthropy like Charles F. Feeney or even a more modest amount of philanthropy like Bill and Melinda Gates (which is still extraordinary), it would make sense, but thi…

If our leaders refuse to take action, we must. America is falling behind the rest of the world in so many ways it's difficult to name them all, but here are a few: Our roads and bridges are catastrophes in waiting; poverty is on the rise after decades of supply side or trickle down economics; the banks have taken millions of homes away from families who now live in cars, motels or on the street; we incarcerate non-violent offenders and illegal immigrants at alarming rates that serve only to disenfranchise far too many of our fellow citizens; our laws seem to protect and represent only the most affluent in society more than not and seem immoral upon close scrutiny. And, all the while, we're all forced to live by the actions of fewer than 600 people, who oftentimes have agendas which are not conducive to a cohesive, fair and compassionate leadership.

We can sit, watch and wait as things continue to get worse for the majority or the people of the United States or we ca…