Initially, the plan for unvalidated supercentenarian claims is
to have three categories:

Unvalidated supercentenarians (110-114)

Longevity claims (115-130)

Longevity myths (130+)

We certainly don't want to, for example, categorize "Old Tom
Parr" as a "supercentenarian" (when he probably was about 80 years
old).

But things become more problematic for the gray area cases.

Should we go ahead and categorize someone such as Maria do Carmo
Geronimo as a "unvalidated supercentenarian" as well as a
"longevity claim"?

One way to do that would be to make two sub-categories for
unvalidated supercentenarians: "Unvaldiated Supercentenarians
(110-114)" and "Longevity Claims (115-130)". Whatever we decide, I
think the rules need to be made clear and c…

In regards to the creation of new categories, please, everyone,
let's give the courtesy of having a discussion before making
unilateral changes. This is the place for it.Ryoung122 (talk)
22:22, November 17, 2016 (UTC)