It was a very successful event for AE911Truth unprecedented debut at the prestigious American Institute of Architects (AIA) 2009 National Convention and Design Exposition, where we spoke to hundreds of architects and must have added about 50 to our petitioners over the course of 3 days.

Most all the responses were positive. People were very open-minded and curious. It was exciting to speak with all these professionals that are really getting it. Most architects, not all, were willing to listen and engaged positively with us.

BTW, if you watch the video of the convention, it was noted that 80 percent of the architects at AIA agreed that the official story doesn't make sense and doubt it.

I just saw the two hour presentation by Richard Gage in San Francisco called "9/11 Blueprint for Truth". He is the head of the organization "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" (http://www.ae911truth.org) that now has over 600 members, including dozens of structural engineers, who are calling for a new independent investigation into 9/11.

Gage's presentation uses science, logic, facts, and common sense to explain step by step why the official theory of how the WTC and Building 7 collapsed is scientifically and logistically IMPOSSIBLE and defies basic laws of physics and conservation. He explains step by step why all the evidence and facts about the collapse points toward the explosives theory of the collapse, not the fire theory of the official version.

It's very compelling and irrefutable and does not whitewash the facts like many debunking of 9/11 truth are. He deals with every fact head on. And he cites around a dozen Structural Engineers (contrary to Popular Mechanics claim that no real structural engineer believes in the 9/11 Truth movement).

Anyhow, if you're open minded and willing to hear all the facts about the WTC collapse, this is a must see presentation. Here is the link to Part 1 of 13:

BTW, he also shows a comical clip where the director of NIST, which was appointed by the government to provide the final word on the collapse of all 3 steel WTC buildings at free fall speed, does not even have basic knowledge of the issues being debated. He shows a clip where the NIST director, a guy with a Ph D in Physics, says that he knows of no eyewitnesses who saw molten steel that was red hot for weeks in the WTC rubble, and then shows clips of many firefighters and clean up crew who saw just that. Obviously the NIST director is not even very well versed in the 9/11 truth debate.

Likewise, in David Chandler's (Physics teacher) videos on YouTube debunking NIST, he shows the two NIST directors looking very shaky and not confident at all in their answers to his critical questions in the press conference, as if they were ashamed and feel guilty about lying and covering up the truth, which is written all over their face. Have a look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng (NIST finally admits freefall)

Anyway, if you support a new independent investigation into 9/11 and agree that those who were behind it should be criminally prosecuted, sign the petition at http://www.ae9/11truth.org

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged