Foreign forces destroyed advanced Russian anti-ship missiles in Syria last week, rebels said on Tuesday - a disclosure that appeared to point to an
Israeli raid.

Qassem Saadeddine, spokesman for the Free Syrian Army's Supreme Military Council, said a pre-dawn strike on Friday hit a Syrian navy barracks at
Safira, near the port of Latakia. He said that the rebel forces' intelligence network had identified newly supplied Yakhont missiles being stored
there.

"It was not the FSA that targeted this," Saadeddine told Reuters. "It is not an attack that was carried out by rebels. "This attack was either by
air raid or long-range missiles fired from boats in the Mediterranean," he said.

Rebels described huge blasts - the ferocity of which, they said, was beyond the firepower available to them but consistent with that of a modern
military like Israel's.

Well, that's certainly an interesting development. Perhaps the US or other Navies got tired of being under threat of sinking by these missiles just
for transiting that end of the Med Sea. It's an Act of War though, without any question. Then again, other things have been too and Syria has just
turned the other cheek for lack of ability to play that game out to the end, if carried the full distance.

I wonder how Russia feels about this development? That's some very high dollar Russian equipment there. Hopefully no Russian techs in the area for
supervisory support or aid with the systems.

Well, that's certainly an interesting development. Perhaps the US or other Navies got tired of being under threat of sinking by these missiles just
for transiting that end of the Med Sea. It's an Act of War though, without any question. Then again, other things have been too and Syria has just
turned the other cheek for lack of ability to play that game out to the end, if carried the full distance.

I wonder how Russia feels about this development? That's some very high dollar Russian equipment there. Hopefully no Russian techs in the area for
supervisory support or aid with the systems.

The Syrian military isn't in much of a position to retaliate easily. The Syrian Air Force has lost half of their aircraft to the war, and
maintenance issues. Even with a massive influx of spare parts from Russia the Syrians can't keep the aircraft flying.

Foreign forces destroyed advanced Russian anti-ship missiles in Syria last week, rebels said on Tuesday - a disclosure that appeared to point to an
Israeli raid.

Qassem Saadeddine, spokesman for the Free Syrian Army's Supreme Military Council, said a pre-dawn strike on Friday hit a Syrian navy barracks at
Safira, near the port of Latakia. He said that the rebel forces' intelligence network had identified newly supplied Yakhont missiles being stored
there.

"It was not the FSA that targeted this," Saadeddine told Reuters. "It is not an attack that was carried out by rebels. "This attack was either by
air raid or long-range missiles fired from boats in the Mediterranean," he said.

Rebels described huge blasts - the ferocity of which, they said, was beyond the firepower available to them but consistent with that of a modern
military like Israel's.

Why should they respond if they keep hitting the wrong targets? "It was not the FSA that targeted this." In other words, it was the FSA that
targeted this, or supplied the Israelis with the intelligence.

Foreign forces destroyed advanced Russian anti-ship missiles in Syria last week, rebels said on Tuesday - a disclosure that appeared to point to an
Israeli raid.

Qassem Saadeddine, spokesman for the Free Syrian Army's Supreme Military Council, said a pre-dawn strike on Friday hit a Syrian navy barracks at
Safira, near the port of Latakia. He said that the rebel forces' intelligence network had identified newly supplied Yakhont missiles being stored
there.

"It was not the FSA that targeted this," Saadeddine told Reuters. "It is not an attack that was carried out by rebels. "This attack was either by
air raid or long-range missiles fired from boats in the Mediterranean," he said.

Rebels described huge blasts - the ferocity of which, they said, was beyond the firepower available to them but consistent with that of a modern
military like Israel's.

This is 100% false, and the rebels are 90% forien AND they are loosing.

Just like the FALSE reports from 7 years agaon claiming the IAF destroyed a Nuke research plant that was guarded by Pansir S-1's Syrian at that time
and probably now didn't have enough PS-1's to give it's self "overlapping Air-coverage" thats why that non-nuke building was destroyed, plus
there was no PS-1 in the area, AND it takes 90 days to train on most SAM site, and I believe it was 2-3 weeks after a small batch of PS-1's came into
Syria (and were NOT guarding the are) that the illegal attack came on that site, but any-ways, time is ticking for U.K./U.S./Israeli military
might.

According to the report, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Vladimir Putin agreed earlier this month that Russia would not sell advanced
S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Syria, and in return Israel would refrain from striking targets in Syria.

According to the report, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Vladimir Putin agreed earlier this month that Russia would not sell advanced
S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Syria, and in return Israel would refrain from striking targets in Syria.

Foreign forces destroyed advanced Russian anti-ship missiles in Syria last week, rebels said on Tuesday - a disclosure that appeared to point to an
Israeli raid.

Qassem Saadeddine, spokesman for the Free Syrian Army's Supreme Military Council, said a pre-dawn strike on Friday hit a Syrian navy barracks at
Safira, near the port of Latakia. He said that the rebel forces' intelligence network had identified newly supplied Yakhont missiles being stored
there.

"It was not the FSA that targeted this," Saadeddine told Reuters. "It is not an attack that was carried out by rebels. "This attack was either by
air raid or long-range missiles fired from boats in the Mediterranean," he said.

Rebels described huge blasts - the ferocity of which, they said, was beyond the firepower available to them but consistent with that of a modern
military like Israel's.

Why should they respond if they keep hitting the wrong targets? "It was not the FSA that targeted this." In other words, it was the FSA that
targeted this, or supplied the Israelis with the intelligence.

Fraid knot housecat. Israel hit those missiles as i told you they did. What is Syria doing? NOTHING. But they sure SAID they were going to do
something the next time Israel this them. LMAO!!!!! PUSSIES

Originally posted by ATSWATCHER

Originally posted by princeofpeace
So where is the Syrian response? I thought they kept saying if this happened again they would respond. What a joke! They are a bunch of Pussies.

Foreign forces destroyed advanced Russian anti-ship missiles in Syria last week, rebels said on Tuesday - a disclosure that appeared to point to an
Israeli raid.

Qassem Saadeddine, spokesman for the Free Syrian Army's Supreme Military Council, said a pre-dawn strike on Friday hit a Syrian navy barracks at
Safira, near the port of Latakia. He said that the rebel forces' intelligence network had identified newly supplied Yakhont missiles being stored
there.

"It was not the FSA that targeted this," Saadeddine told Reuters. "It is not an attack that was carried out by rebels. "This attack was either by
air raid or long-range missiles fired from boats in the Mediterranean," he said.

Rebels described huge blasts - the ferocity of which, they said, was beyond the firepower available to them but consistent with that of a modern
military like Israel's.

This is 100% false, and the rebels are 90% forien AND they are loosing.

Just like the FALSE reports from 7 years agaon claiming the IAF destroyed a Nuke research plant that was guarded by Pansir S-1's Syrian at that time
and probably now didn't have enough PS-1's to give it's self "overlapping Air-coverage" thats why that non-nuke building was destroyed, plus
there was no PS-1 in the area, AND it takes 90 days to train on most SAM site, and I believe it was 2-3 weeks after a small batch of PS-1's came into
Syria (and were NOT guarding the are) that the illegal attack came on that site, but any-ways, time is ticking for U.K./U.S./Israeli military
might.

Fraid knot housecat. Israel hit those missiles as i told you they did. What is Syria doing? NOTHING. But they sure SAID they were going to do
something the next time Israel this them. LMAO!!!!! PUSSIES

Originally posted by ATSWATCHER

Originally posted by princeofpeace
So where is the Syrian response? I thought they kept saying if this happened again they would respond. What a joke! They are a bunch of Pussies.

Foreign forces destroyed advanced Russian anti-ship missiles in Syria last week, rebels said on Tuesday - a disclosure that appeared to point to an
Israeli raid.

Qassem Saadeddine, spokesman for the Free Syrian Army's Supreme Military Council, said a pre-dawn strike on Friday hit a Syrian navy barracks at
Safira, near the port of Latakia. He said that the rebel forces' intelligence network had identified newly supplied Yakhont missiles being stored
there.

"It was not the FSA that targeted this," Saadeddine told Reuters. "It is not an attack that was carried out by rebels. "This attack was either by air
raid or long-range missiles fired from boats in the Mediterranean," he said.

Rebels described huge blasts - the ferocity of which, they said, was beyond the firepower available to them but consistent with that of a modern
military like Israel's.

This is 100% false, and the rebels are 90% forien AND they are loosing.

Just like the FALSE reports from 7 years agaon claiming the IAF destroyed a Nuke research plant that was guarded by Pansir S-1's Syrian at that time
and probably now didn't have enough PS-1's to give it's self "overlapping Air-coverage" thats why that non-nuke building was destroyed, plus there was
no PS-1 in the area, AND it takes 90 days to train on most SAM site, and I believe it was 2-3 weeks after a small batch of PS-1's came into Syria (and
were NOT guarding the are) that the illegal attack came on that site, but any-ways, time is ticking for U.K./U.S./Israeli military might.

O.K. If it DID happen it's only because they (Syria) have a major lack of advanced "SAMs" with "over-lapping air coverage" that would have made it
impossible for the IAF to do that, never the less time IS ticking some thing BIG is going happen.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.