In a statement Monday, the hospital management said it "does not comment on past or current litigation."

Battle's lawsuit claims a note was posted on an assignment clipboard reading, "No African American nurse to take care of baby." She says that later was removed, but claims black nurses weren't assigned to care for the baby for about a month because of their race.

The Free Press said the lawsuit recounted how the neonatal intensive care nurse was at the infant's bedside when a man came in and she requested to see the hospital-issued identification wrist band given to parents of patients. The man responded that " ... I need to see your supervisor."

A supervising nurse spoke with the father who told him he didn't want African-Americans to care for his child; the supervising nurse, reports the Free Press, also told Battle that he appeared to have a swastika tatoo on his arm.

“What flashed in my mind is ‘What’s next?' A note on the water fountain that says ‘No blacks'? Or a note on the bathroom that says ‘No blacks’?” Battle told the Free Press.

A legal expert told the Free Press that the law involves some tension giving both sides a standing. While patients can choose doctors (women may choose female gynecologists, for example) and what hospital they use, there are also laws prohibiting discrimination, Lance Gable, an associate professor of health law at Wayne State University Law School told the Free Press.

"There is growing concern around the country about how this could be in 2013," Michigan NAN President Rev. Charles E. Williams II told the Journal. "There will be growing pressure as Hurley continues to be quiet."

Share this article

Link copied.

Next up

Here are more stories that look at the news with empathy, insight, and hope.