Introduction

The Case Law Database (“CLD”) is a gateway to the jurisprudence of the ICTR, ICTY, and MICT Appeals Chambers.

It provides direct access to extracts of key judgements and decisions rendered by the ICTR, ICTY, and MICT Appeals Chambers since their inception, as well as to full-text versions of the corresponding appeal judgements and decisions.

Users can conduct quick searches by notions, cases names, titles of filings, date (in year-month-day format), statutes, rules, and other instruments through the “Basic Search” page. In addition, refined searches in all fields of the database can be conducted through the “Advance Search” feature.

Please note that the CLD does not include confidential decisions and restatements of established case law and does not necessarily contain all notable rulings by the Appeals Chambers of the ICTR, the ICTY, and the MICT. For exact numbering of footnotes, refer to full documents.

The CLD is a living tool and its content is being regularly updated. Please help us improve the service by using our feedback form.

Help

Browse the list of legal notion titles using the A-Z index. Click on the notion to show the page containing relevant case law extracts.

Submit Feedback

Please help us improve the service by using our feedback form.

Name

Email

Message

Public redacted version

5. The Appeals Chamber notes that, while Nteziryayo filed the public redacted version of his Corrected Amended Appeal Brief with two annexes containing the index of authorities and source materials, he failed to append the relevant annexes to the confidential version of his Corrected Amended Appeal Brief. Nteziryayo had likewise failed to append the relevant annexes to his Amended Appeal Brief. The Appeals Chamber considers that a public redacted version of a confidential filing cannot contain more source materials than the original confidential filing. […]

CONSIDERING […]that issuing public redacted versions of the Decisions will ensure the public nature of these proceedings to the extent possible while the interests of the parties on whose behalf the ex parte status was granted can be adequately protected by appropriate redactions;