A blog about my landscape image making. On landscape imaging in general, bits of history and related disciplines (Architecture, Geography, Neuro Science, Philosophy and whatever happens to get my attention)

2010-10-29

The recent rarefied posting is mainly due to some doubts about the function of this blog. In the beginning I meant it to be a container of my sparse thinkings on photography (visual ones included), progressively I've started looking for something more appropriate for the kind of media (the blog). I'm still not sure if this really works, but the use of series of successive views, sometimes reordered in editing, lends me to a twofold evaluation. On one side I really like the way this strategy lets me tell about a place, on the other the time span taken by the publication of the entire selection takes a cumbersome dimension given the post intervals; as an example consider that I still have four months left in the "Porta Garibaldi" series of urban landscape detours.

I'm evaluating two possible exit strategies: the first one is to downscale the subject size, it substantially consists in a reduction of the size of the space of interest so to produce a shorter presentation cycle, this short sequence on the "belvedere" is an attempt at it. The second one, not necessarily in opposition to the former, is to start making stronger selections at the cost of loosing the succession of my movements in the targeted landscape. The selection may be more on the photographic side, to the artefact side so to say. This summer I've made a lot of thinking about the opportunity to compress an experience like a drift/dèrive, in a set of autonomous pictures that could stand by themselves alone, but to rely on a single a picture feels unnatural at the moment.

An area where photography really differs from the other kinds of imaging is in the sequence, or better, the relatively easiness, and convenience, to repeat the take. It is not a case, I think, that one of the first significant contribution to the general knowledge coming from photography have been the sequences from Eadweard Muybridge on the Galloping Question

From this post I'm also starting to post an Italian rendering of the text.

2010-10-06

Carrying on my digression on specialism, started with the previous post, I'd like to point out some considerations on what generally goes under the “New topographics” umbrella.

As many of you already knew “New Topographics” is the name of a collective photographic exhibit, that established, along with several other similar tendencies in Europe, a new horizon in the “photographable” in landscape imaging. Socio economically speaking there's no wonder, in such a perspective, that “Kodak”, back in the seventies of the past century, was interested in.

The exhibit however did not present an univocal concept or a unified view, even less some model to follow. While this is what makes it interesting, and in retrospect, forty years later, anticipatory, it is also one the reasons that limited the reach to a very restricted photographic realm. A simple measure may be derived by searching “New Topographics” in flickr and compare it to some other search key of your choice, try “landscape” itself to have a reference.

The exhibit is said to have had an impact in promoting photography as a general form of art. I'm not sure of that, and even if that was true that of contemporary art may be an even smaller domain.