Thoughts on Life, Love, Politics, Hypocrisy and Coming Out in Mid-Life

Thursday, December 17, 2015

10 Bald-Faced Lies from the Republican Debate

One way in which one can tell that the Republican Party has become largely controlled by the Christofascists is the fact that the truth no longer matters. No one lies more than the "godly folk" so it should come as no surprise that GOP candidates have adopted the same truth free agenda and see themselves as having a license to say whatever furthers their cause, namely power and upward movement in polls of GOP ignorance embracing voters. And the focus of many of the untruths is to pander to the bigotry and racism of the GOP base which seemingly will believe anything so long as it plays to its widely held prejudices. A piece in Salon looks at some of the top lies from Tuesday night's debate. Here are highlights:

Another GOP debate, another steaming pile of half-truths,
lies and pseudo-facts. The Republican Party seems to be almost entirely
post-truth at this point, and if you call them out, you’re the liberal
media! It’s a brilliant racket and one that led us to the current state
of affairs where facts aren’t just dispensable, but a political
liability. Without further ado, here are the top lies and distortions
from tonight’s debate.

1. Ben Carson and Ted Cruz: “We cannot vet refugees.” A popular refrain in the wake of the Paris and San Bernadino attacks is
that the U.S. government (or more specifically President Obama) cannot
properly vet Syrian refugees. This has been repeatedly debunked as
hysterical posturing, yet remains a popular trope among the far right.
In addition to a rather thorough takedown by John Oliver two weeks ago, PoliticoFact rated this claim, “Mostly False” . .

2. Marco Rubio claims Assad created ISIS. This
is an old canard, and one that even nominally lefty outlets like Vox
like to push, but it has little to do with reality. In an effort to
shore up his neocon credentials, Rubio has doubled down on regime change
in Syria while other GOP candidates like Paul and Cruz – as well as
Bernie Sanders – have run away from this position. To do this Rubio has
pushed the conspiracy theory that the reason ISIS grew in Syria is
because the U.S. didn’t back the rebels opposed to Assad when in fact
the CIA, according to documents revealed by Edward Snowden, spent $1 billion a year arming, funding and assisting the opposition.

3. Donald Trump cites bogus poll that 25% of Muslims condone acts of violence. A
popular trope among the nativist wing of the Republican Party (aka the
Republican Party), the bogus stat that 25% of Muslins support violence
is thrown around quite often. But it originates from noted
Islamophobic “think tank” Center for Security Policy.

4. Chris Christie insists he was appointed U.S. Attorney on Sept 10, 2001. Why
does Christie keep repeating this lie? It’s been debunked several times
and it’s a matter of public record. It’s a great soundbite to be sure,
and if true, would put Christie in the heart of the most significant
foreign policy crisis of the past 20 years. But the reality is that
George W. Bush nominated Christie on Dec. 7, 2001, as one can clearly
see from a White House press release.

6. Donald Trump keeps saying he self-funds, but we know that’s demonstrably false. This
is another assertion that’s completely disproven and easily searchable
online (which raises the question of why CNN hasn’t bothered doing
this). Trump has received, according to the last available FEC filings, upward of $3.9 million from individual donors compared to using only $101,000 of his own money.

7. Moderator lie: CNN’s Wolf Blitzer claimed terrorism fears are higher than they’ve been since 9/11. That’s not true. A recent Gallup poll shows terrorism fears have spiked recently, but are the same as in 2005 and nowhere near as high as after 9/11.

8. Lie by omission: Why was the attack on Planned Parenthood not mentioned in a debate about terrorism? . . . . non-Muslim terrorism was completely absent. The recent Planned Parenthood terrorist attack carried out by a man who claims to be a “warrior for babies” wasn’t discussed in the broader context of terrorism. Why this is so remains unclear.

9. Lie by cliche: What the hell is Fiorina talking about?Fiorina
keeps referencing “building up the sixth fleet” because presumably it
sounds like some important walk-and-talk dialogue in the West Wing, but
it actually makes no sense. Several experts have chimed in on this strange refrain and pointed out that it’s basically nonsense. As military magazine Stars and Stripes noted:

Her
meaning wasn’t immediately clear — the U.S. 6th Fleet is less a
collection of ships than a command structure for operating American
warships in the Atlantic and Mediterranean. Moreover, the fleet is one
of the few growing military commands in Europe.

10. Several candidates keep claiming the Iran deal “gives $150 billion to Iran.” As the LA Times notes,
it’s not “giving” $150 billion to Iran, it’s relieving sanctions that
will ultimately unfreeze more than $150 billion in assets to Iran, but
the funds were already Iran’s to begin with. No one is “giving” Iran
anything.

As for condoning the use of violence, I would argue that the group most in favor of using violence is evangelical Christians who seemingly cannot wait to see the slaughter of Muslims by American forces. They probably like to see some gays slaughtered as well since they claim we are a threat to Western Civilization.

Translate This Page

Contact Me to Order Title Work

LGBT Legal Services

About Me

Out gay attorney in a committed relationship; formerly married and father of three wonderful children; sometime activist and political/news junkie; survived coming out in mid-life and hope to share my experiences and reflections with others.
In the career/professional realm, I am affiliated with Caplan & Associates PC where I practice in the areas of real estate, estate planning (Wills, Trusts, Advanced Medical Directives, Financial Powers of Attorney, Durable Medical Powers of Attorney); business law and commercial transactions; formation of corporations and limited liability companies and legal services to the gay, lesbian and transgender community, including birth certificate amendment.

Disclaimer on Opinions and Content

This Blog contains content that may be innapropriate for readers under the legal age of 18. IF YOU ARE UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, PLEASE LEAVE NOW. Thank you

This is an opinion and commentary blog and the opinions and contents of this Blog - including opinions expressed concerning opponents of LGBT equality - are the opinions only of the individual blogger and should not be attributed to any other individuals or to any organization of which the blogger is a past or current member.

Followers

PLU Top Gay Blogs

Michael-in-Norfolk disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability, or availability of information or material displayed on this site and does not claim credit for any images or articles featured on this site, unless otherwise noted. All visual content is copyrighted to it's respectful owners. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies, and Michael-in-Norfolk does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. If you own rights to any of the images or articles, and do not wish them to appear on this site, please contact Michael-in-Norfolk via e-mail and they will be promptly removed. Michael-in-Norfolk contains links to other Internet sites. These links are provided solely as a convenience and are not endorsements of any products or services in such sites, and no information or content in such site has been endorsed or approved by this blog.