If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

I am still curious how you condemn reactionary posts as bad for the board, and then revel in posting inflammatory posts yourself. Seems more than a tad hypocritical. Are you comfortable dealing in hypocrisy?

I don't think Chadman's posts are inflamatory. I think they are amusing. JMHO

I don't think Chadman's posts are inflamatory. I think they are amusing. JMHO

If it hadn't been for this response Chadman might have missed this comment. Probably would have been ok with that...

Still, in the name of charity & goodwill, in response to the 'hypocrisy' comment- the problem is not necessarily 'inflamatory posts', so much as the volume of 'inflamatory posts'. Some posters seem more prone to sprouting 'made for emotive' responses than others...

If it hadn't been for this response Chadman might have missed this comment. Probably would have been ok with that...

Still, in the name of charity & goodwill, in response to the 'hypocrisy' comment- the problem is not necessarily 'inflamatory posts', so much as the volume of 'inflamatory posts'. Some posters seem more prone to sprouting 'made for emotive' responses than others...

Hmmm, not really a complete answer. You haven't commented purely on volume (you have, but not always) but you have whined about reactionary posts....but then you admittedly did the same. When you speak out against something but then practice the very same act, as you condemn, it's still hypocrisy. No different than anti gay republicans getting caught soliciting for oral sex in a male bathroom.

Hmmm, not really a complete answer. You haven't commented purely on volume (you have, but not always) but you have whined about reactionary posts....but then you admittedly did the same. When you speak out against something but then practice the very same act, as you condemn, it's still hypocrisy. No different than anti gay republicans getting caught soliciting for oral sex in a male bathroom.

I don't care about your proclivities...

When Chadman makes an "inflammatory post" there are two things present that are lacking in your posts:

1) A long track record of quality posts. This earns you some latitude in the eyes of fellow posters. You do not have this.

2) A sense of irony, which most of the posters here find amusing. You, for the most part, are not amusing.