Online dating a critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science

Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action. Impact of infertility on quality of life, marital adjustment, and sexual function.

Destiny beliefs, state attachment anxiety, and forgiveness.

Segundo um estudo realizado por Finkel et al. Dating and matchmaking site benchmark report. We scrutinize these researchers' a statistical concern that heightened stringency with respect to false-positives will increase false-negatives and b metascientific concern that larger samples and executing direct replications engender opportunity costs that will decrease the rate of making novel discoveries.

Human Communication Research, 37, 58 — However, such services are hampered by the difficulty of finding relevant and convenient opportunities for transactions in a timely fashion. Regarding communication, although online daters can benefit from having short-term CMC with potential partners before meeting them face-to-face, longer periods of CMC prior to a face-to-face meeting may actually hurt people's romantic prospects.

Journal of Abnormal Psychology,— Formal intermediaries in the marriage market: The presentation of self in everyday life.

Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 7 — Computers in Human Behavior, 17, — We argue their statistical concern is unwarranted given open science proponents recommend such practices to reduce the inflated Type I error rate from. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, — The hazards of predicting divorce without crossvalidation.

Putting beauty back in the eye of the beholder: Management Science, 50, — American Psychologist, 11, The attraction-similarity model and dating couples: