Jew Loving Muslim Nazi Anders Breivik Wooed The EDL Other Liberals

ANDERS Brehing Breivik – the militant Christian suspected of murdering 92 people in Norway – has a link to the English Defence League and Stop the Islamification of Europe.

He is a member of the far-right neo-Nazi Nordisk forum. Breivik sees Israel as a buffer to prevent Islam taking over Europe.

(These whacky neo-Nazis want to use the Jews to save Christianity – while the anti-Semites portray the Jews as the fomenters of all and every plot to, er, save the Nazis.)

Breivik wrote:

“I have on some occasions had discussions with SIOE and EDL and recommended them to use certain strategies. The tactics of the EDL are now to ‘lure’ an overreaction from the Jihad Youth/Extreme-Marxists, something they have succeeded in doing several times already.”

It’s a plot to get the Muslims? Well, the Muslims have become the usual suspects. And that is in part because Muslim extremists do like to talk about loving death, killing the infidel and taking over Europe by force. Anyhow, the media played along. The New York Times wrote:

Initial reports focused on the possibility of Islamic militants, in particular Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami, or Helpers of the Global Jihad, cited by some analysts as claiming responsibility for the attacks. American officials said the group was previously unknown and might not even exist.

There was ample reason for concern that terrorists might be responsible.

Because only terrorists can be Islamist Muslims? The NYT also wrote:

Terrorism specialists said that even if the authorities ultimately ruled out terrorism as the cause of Friday’s assaults, other kinds of groups or individuals were mimicking al-Qaida’s signature brutality and multiple attacks.

“If it does turn out to be someone with more political motivations, it shows these groups are learning from what they see from al-Qaida,” said Brian Fishman, a counterterrorism researcher at the New America Foundation in Washington.

Because al-Qaeda is not political? It is – get this – actually a religious organisation? And even when Muslims are not involved, they are involved?

Jennifger Runbin jumped to a conclusion and then carried on jumping up and down on it:

This is a sobering reminder for those who think it’s too expensive to wage a war against jihadists. I spoke to Gary Schmitt of the American Enterprise Institute, who has been critical of proposed cuts in defense and of President Obama’s Afghanistan withdrawal plan. “There has been a lot of talk over the past few months on how we’ve got al-Qaeda on the run and, compared with what it once was, it’s become a rump organization. But as the attack in Oslo reminds us, there are plenty of al-Qaeda allies still operating. No doubt cutting the head off a snake is important; the problem is, we’re dealing with global nest of snakes.”

No, this is a sobering reminder for those who think it’s too tedious to reserve judgment about horrifying events rather than instantly turning them into talking points for pre-conceived views.

In any case, Breivik is a Muslim, isn’t he? Get this comment on Jihad Watch:

George:

If this guy is a muslim, closet-muslim or muslim sympathizer, I hope Norwegian officialdom doesn’t cover-up for him–which is to say, cover-up for themselves…

And:

Mr Sanity:

There is always the possibility that he is a muslim convert trying to get his jihadi killing in, and at the same time, false-flag the attacks to put “islamophobes” in a bad light.

But isn’t he a Jew?

He was part of the Jewish anti-Muslim movement in Europe by way of the Fjordman Organization

Electonic Intifada reports on how militant Muslims came to be blamed. Well a track record in blowing things up is one part of it:

Immediately after news of the bombing of government buildings in Norway’s capital Oslo, the Internet buzzed with speculation about who might have done it and why. Most speculation focused on so-called Islamist militancy and Muslims. The urge to speculate after grave events is understandable, but the focus of speculation, its amplification through social media, its legitimization in mainstream media, and the privilege granted to so-called experts is a common pattern…

The New York Times originally reported:

A terror group, Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami, or the Helpers of the Global Jihad, issued a statement claiming responsibility for the attack, according to Will McCants, a terrorism analyst at C.N.A., a research institute that studies terrorism…

The source is Will McCants, adjunct faculty at Johns Hopkins University. On his website he describes himself as formerly “Senior Adviser for Countering Violent Extremism at the U.S. Department of State, program manager of the Minerva Initiative at the Department of Defense, and fellow at West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center.” This morning, he posted “Alleged Claim for Oslo Attacks” on his blog Jihadica:

This was posted by Abu Sulayman al-Nasir to the Arabic jihadi forum, Shmukh, around 10:30am EST (thread 118187). Shmukh is the main forum for Arabic-speaking jihadis who support al-Qaeda. Since the thread is now inaccessible (either locked or taken down), I am posting it here. I don’t have time at the moment to translate the whole thing but I translated the most important bits on twitter.

McCants later reported that the claim of responsibility was retracted by the author “Abu Sulayman al-Nasir.” Furthermore, according to McCants, the moderator of this forum declared that speculation about the attack would be prohibited because the contents of the forum were appearing in mainstream media. It does seem more than a little bit odd that genuine “jihadis” would post on a closed forum that a former US official and “counterterrorism expert” openly writes about infiltrating…

“Abu Sulayman al-Nasir” had made a posting of interest on a relevant forum. If McCants hadn’t noted it, someone else would have. And McCants treated the material responsibly, cautioning readers on Twitter and on his blog about the provenance of the posting (“Could just be forum user blowing hot air. forum members also confused abt who this guy is”).

I’ve written a lot about bogus terror experts on this blog (as a result I’ve been accused of being financed by George Soros or Islamic extremists). However, McCants isn’t someone who should be categorised in with the charlatans. His blog is scholarly and measured, and he first came to my attention on Twitter in June when he wrote of the need to improve counter-terrorism training (including drawing attention to the Lieberman-Collins letter).

Insofar as there has been inaccurate speculation of Islamic involvement in Oslo/Utoya, we can be rightfully scathing of those who would use the bombing and shooting to whip up anti-Muslim feeling, or who have jumped the gun irresponsibly – but it was manifestly reasonable to suspect that this was Jihadi operation. McCants was doing his job by flagging up the kind of material he regularly monitors.

Anders Gravers, founder of Stop Islamisation of Europe (SIOE), said Anders Behring Breivik had made the application around 18 months ago.

Breivik said in an Internet posting in December 2009 (here) he had had discussions with SIOE, but Gravers said his organisation had no record of this.

“He has never been in contact with us and he has never given us any advice,” Gravers told Reuters.

But he said it was possible Breivik had attended one of its demonstrations.

He said an SIOE member in the Faroe Islands had checked Breivik’s Facebook “friends” on the social media site when he tried to join and discovered one who used a picture of Danish neo-Nazi leader Jonni Hansen as his profile picture.

“He advised us not to allow this guy to join or be able to post on the Facebook wall (message page),” said SIOE co-founder Stephen Gash.

SIOA and SIOE declare our sympathy for the victims and relatives of the victims of the heinous mass murders in Norway. We denounce the attacker and reiterate our dedication to the defense of free societies and opposition to all vigilantism and violence. Attempts to link us to these murders on the basis of alleged postings by the murderer mentioning us are absurd and offensive. Our work is and always has been wholly focused upon defending humane values and freedoms. There is no way that any sane person could possibly conclude that committing mass murder of children would advance the principles for which we stand. And if he was not sane, then any imputation of responsibility to us falters on that basis. Islamic jihadists and supremacists routinely invoke Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence, and thus those teachings are and should be rightly held up to scrutiny; by contrast, our record of support for human rights and the dignity of all human beings is consistent and unbroken. This murderer should be punished to the full extent of the law; any attempts to tar freedom fighters with his actions is deplorable.

Of course for the left and their rabid trolls, facts are irrelevant.

Suggestions are that Breivik blogged as Fjordman. The last post was in 2005. It reads:

Fjordman will now close this blog. It will still be possible to post comments at this blog for another couple of weeks, but from early January 2006, there will be no more activity here. The old posts will still be here for reference, of course. For the most part, Fjordman will be quiet. However, I will still occasionally post comments at LittleGreenFotballs or Jihad Watch. Every now and then, when I have the time and want to write about some topic, this will be posted at other blogs such as the Gates of Vienna, and offered to Faith Freedom International and the Brussels Journal.

Are these blogs now deemed conduits to terrorism? Says Geller, via Loonwatch:

Geller responded on her own website: “This is just a sinister attempt to tar all anti-jihadists with responsibility for this man’s heinous actions…this is war. And the left is vicious, amoral and depraved. They mean to win, and that is the only way they know how.”

According to his own statements, Anders Behring Breivik previously operated the blog ‘Fjordman’, and later wrote for many years under the pseudonym Fjordman for the anti-Muslim and Zionist blogs Gates of Vienna and Jihad Watch.

A video on the YouTube website promoting a fight against Islam apparently shows pictures of the man suspected of a gun and bomb attack in Norway, wearing a wetsuit and pointing an automatic weapon.

The pictures appear at the end of an approximately 12-minute video called “Knights Templar 2083.” The video was posted here

The pictures in the video also appeared on the now closed Facebook page of Anders Behring Breivik, detained after 85 people were gunned down at a youth camp and another 7 killed in a bomb attack on Friday.

A Norwegian discussion website, www.freak.no, also had a link to a 1,500-page book called “2083 – A European Declaration of Independence.”

It was not possible to verify who uploaded the video, which was posted on July 22 by an Andrew Berwick.

The 2083 book is also signed by an Andrew Berwick. The author says within the document that Andrew Berwick is an Anglicized version of Anders Breivik.

Friday July 22 – Day 82: Initiate blasting sequenses at pre-determined sites. Test dirt for gram of gold per kg. Have enough material for at least 20 blasts. Start capitalization of project as soon as Ihave results. Time is running out, liquidity squeese inc. Call/email all my investor contacts withupdated online prospectus/pdf. This is going to be an all-or-nothing scenario. If I fail to generate acceptable precious metals yields,in combination with swift initiation of the capitalization for securing the areas I will be heavilyindebted. I must complete capitalization of the mineral extraction project within August at latest !When I have the required seed capital I will have enough funds to employ the services of professional blasting engineers.If all fails, I will initiate my career with a private security firm in conflict zones to acquire maximum funds in the shortest period of time to repay the debts. First coming costume party this autumn, dress up as a police officer. Arrive with insignias:-) Will b eawesome as people will be very astonished:-)Side note; imagine if law enforcement would visit me the next days. They would probably get the wrong idea and think I was a terrorist, lol :o)

On killing girls and women:

Every female category A, B, C traitor or system protector out there is someone’s daughter, someone’s sister or mother. But then again, so are the victims of the current systems, f example the girl who committed suicide after being gang-raped by Muslims.

War isn’t pretty. It never has been. It is essential to know that approximately 60-70% of all cultural Marxists or suicidal humanist are female and up to 20% of police officers and military personnel (system protectors). Being a Justiciar Knight will involve killing our targets, or any system protector trying to stop us, indiscriminately. You will face women in battle and they will not hesitate to kill you. To them, you are just another armed criminal nut case as they will not know your true political agenda until after you have been slain or are apprehended. If you hesitate as much as a second due to the fact that your opponent is female you will fail. You must therefore embrace and familiarise yourself with the concept of killing women, even very attractive women.

The urban Justiciar Knight’s best ally is the terrain, and because this is so he must know it like the palm of his hand. To have the terrain as an ally means to know how to use with intelligence its unevenness, it’s high and low points, its turns, its irregularities, its fixed and secret passages, its abandoned areas, its thickets, etc., taking maximum advantage of all of this for the success of armed actions, escapes, retreats, covers, and hiding places. Impasses and narrow spots, gorges, streets under repair, stationary police posts, and closed-off streets, the entrances and exits to tunnels and sewers and those that the enemy can close off, corners controlled or watched by the police, traffic lights and signals; all this must be thoroughly known and studied in order to avoid fatal errors. Our challenge is to get through and to know where and how to hide, leaving the enemy bewildered in areas he doesn’t know. Being familiar with the avenues, streets, alleys, ins and outs, the corners of the urban centers, its paths and shortcuts, its empty lots, its underground passages, its pipes and sewer systems, the urban resistance fighter safely crosses through the irregular and difficult terrain unfamiliar to the police, where the police can be surprised in a fatal ambush or trap at any moment. Because he knows the terrain, the Justiciar Knight can pass through it on foot, on bicycle, in a car, and never be trapped.

On who he should target:

It is much more rational and pragmatical to focus on the easier unprotected targets instead of sacrificing good men on an impossible target. The basis of our selection process is to choose the primary propagandists of cultural Marxism/multiculturalism. Instead of wasting good men on an impossible mission we should target unprotected category A and B traitors first and foremost.

WELL I REALLY CAN NOT UNDERSTAND JENS STOLTENBERG
HE ACCUSES THE RIGHTIST PARTIES OF HIS COUNTRY FOR TERROR ACTS IN HIS OWN COUNTRY;;; NORWICH COULD KILL OTHER NORWICH FOR POLITICAL OPPORTUNISM;;;HYPERNATIONALISTS WOULD HAVE KILLED PEOPLE OF THEIR OWN NATION THAT DEFEND AND LOVE SO MUCH
THESE ARE VERY SEVERE AND SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS

THE ANNOYING TRUTH IS OTHER
NORWEGIAN NOBEL INSTITUTE IN 2009 VOTED BARAC OBAMA FOR NOBEL OF PEACE . BARAC OBAMA CAPTURED AND KILLED BIN LADEN
IN 2010 THE NOWEGIAN NOBEL INSTITUTE DECIDED TO GIVE NOBEL ON LIU XIABAO AN ACTION THAT CAUSED THE REACTION OF THE CHINESE MASONRY
IT IS MORE THAN OBVIOUS AND I REALLY CAN NOT UNDERSTAND WHY ANYONE IS NOT SEING THIS THAT THE CHINESE ARCADE MASONS AND THE ARCADE OF BIN LADEN[MASONRY IS A VERY COMPLICATED THING
WITH MANY BRANCHES AROUND THE WORLD]
DECIDED TO GIVE A VERY HARD LESSON TO THE NORWICH NATION
FOR THE VERY INTENSIVE POLITICAL CHOISES OF NORWEGIAN NOBEL INSTITUTE

AS WE HEARD THE ASSASINATOR WAS A MASON THAT HAD CONNECTIONS WITH MASONS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES
IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT AL QAEDA OR THE CHINESE REGIME TO PROVIDE HIM MONEY FOR EXPLOSIVES AND TO GIVE HIM A GENERAL PLAN

NO THIS PLAN WAS SCHEDULED NOT YEARS AGO AS NORWICH POLICE AUTHORITIES OR JOURNALISTS ARE CLAIMING DECEIVING THE AUDIENCE BUT WHEN THE DATE OF THE GATHERING AT THIS SPECIFIC ISLAND OF THE YOUTH PARTY OF STOLTENBERG WAS BEING ARRANGED [2 OR 3 MONTHS APPROXIMATELLY]

AS I TOLD IN 2009 NORWEGIAN NOBEL INSTITUTE EXPOSES WITH ITS BEHAVIOUR NORWAY TO BECOME A CENTER OF THE GLOBAL TERRORISM
I HEARD THAT THE ASSASINATOR WAS DISPLEASED WITH STOLTENBERG

ON THE CONTRARY
HE SHOULD HAVE MADE HIM A STATUE LIKE MARC AURELIUS IN OSLO BECAUSE STOLTENBERG WAS ONE OF THE FIRST EUROPEAN LEADERS WHO WERE IN THE FRONT LINE CONCERNING LIBYA WAR AND AFGANISTAN OCCUPATION

SO IRRATIONALISM FROM NORWICH MEDIA IS HIGHLY INTENSIVE

THE BOMBING IN THE GOVERNMENTS BUILDING WAS SURELY A WORK FROM AL QAEDA[REMINDS A LOT KENYA AND TANZABNIA EMBASSIES BOMBINGS]
AL QAEDA TOOK REVENGE FOR OSAMA BIN LADEN AND WE SHOULD EXPECT NEWS FROM THE OTHER SIDE I MEAN THE WESTERN FOR THE ISSUE OF AL QAEDA THAT STROKE THE CENTER OF OSLO USING A PERSON FROM NORWAY AND PLAYING AN UNFORGETABLE THEATRICAL ROLE IN OSLO.
WHO SAID THAT TERRORISTS DO NOT LIKE THEATER;;;

well, I never realised that Norwich was such a hotbed of international terrorism – who would have believed it, eh…?
and do you have to shout? if you want your views to be read then have the decency to type properly….

Gary

Why are people trying to make sense of this guys thinking or actions. Surely the basic fact is that anyone who considers murdering children to be justifiable in ANY way is completely insane. So let’s stop analysing his scriblings. The biggest mistake was in not killing him ,or at least tell the public he had died so as to starve him of the oxygen of notoriety or fame.

Emma

Well I see from this guy’s ‘manifesto’ that he was an ardent follower of Melanie Phillips’ deranged ravings.

I can only garner from this that reading the putrid bile of Mad Mel’s column in the Daily Mail leads people to mass murder their fellow citizens; and therefore, the woman should be immediately incarcerated under the prevention of terrorism act.

(Note to Anorak – I’m not being entirely serious – although my opinion of Melanie Phillips is that she is a scribbler with absolutely no redeeming characteristics whatsoever – including her appalling haircut).

As for the crime itself – a tragedy for which there is no language adequate to describe. The dignity of the Norwegian people is also humbling to watch – grief and bewilderment but none of the neanderthal revenge fantasies that I fear would accompany such an act in this country or the USA.

Jeff Casey

I agree with some of the things that the Norwegian man said but his actions were totally out of order and what he did was what his enemies wanted. Some of the politicians in Europe should be blamed for uncontrolled immigration into Europe especially Britain and the rise of Muslim terrorists and extremists and thank GD for Israel that fights back against the evil of today.

June

I think trying to justify his actions in any way is pointless – he has scant regard for human life whatever its nationality or belief. These were children and young people who were slain just to suit a madman’s whims.

Agreed , yes there is too much immigration of any nationality into the UK, we are swamped, but all this happened in Norway anyway.

The only way any excuse could be made for his behaviour is if there is a brain tumour present in the ‘thought’ part of his brain.

For everyone’s safety though this person needs to be restrained for the rest of his life, thus far he cannot be reasoned with, and his complete lack of remorse is mind boggling

Emma

Jeff, can I ask, what things has he said that you agree with? I find everything he has ‘said’ (or rather written) to be disordered, hate-filled extremism. The idea of a ‘monoculture’ (his words) is extremely scary to me.

It is also interesting that he sees this ‘monoculture’ in the same way past genocidal dictators have – as some kind of ‘utopia’. Something that indicates that we should always be very wary of people’s utopias. The word ‘utopia’ after all does not (as some think) mean ‘good place’ but ‘no place’. (Thomas More used the word ironically when he wrote ‘Utopia’).

Problem is, Utopias tend to be defined as much by what (or who) they exclude as what they include.

dairy

Jeff – your post says it anyway – his argument was with the politicians and the government policy – not 13-20yr old youngsters camping on a social weekend!!! Nothing, absolutely nothing justifies his actions and he should be roundly condemned by all right-thinking people, no matter what their views.

coolandcalm

Emma, do you know / have you met Melanie Phillips? Just wondering about the haircut remark…..

Emma

C&C – Ms Phillips and her badly shaped crop are regulars on Question Time. The hair looks like she hacks at it with a breadknife.

Gary

That’s very scary jeff. I thought that society was formed by the will of the majority. If it’s ok for every minority to start shooting as a form of deadly hissy-fit because the majority doesn’t support them, then it’s going to be like Dodge City out there in a week.

Moriarty

Neo-Nazi’s are not more logical in their political aspirations than any other individual. Look at Eastern European nations, how is it that they have Neo-Nazi movements within their borders, when Hitler and the Nazi Party the two entities they wish to emulate wanted to enslave Slavs and than murder them off once they were capable of doing so. Yet, these idiot Neo-Nazi’s in Russia and the rest of Eastern Europe continue to follow whatever the crazed lunatic wrote in Mein Kampf.

So, the fact that Breivik, a member of ultra-right wing organizations wished to see Israel survive as a buffer state, doesn’t mean that he loved Jews; if anything he looked at it from a pragmatic approach. So long as the State of Israel exists, Palestinians, thus Arabs, which I’m sure individuals like him all equate to Muslims, are checked in place. Sure, they emigrate, legally as well as illegally into Europe but at least you have a nation which is deterring a supposed spread of Islam into Europe. I seriously doubt that Breivik or individuals who think along his lines actually give a fuck about Israel or the Jews in any other sense other than for political means.

dairy

I don’t think that Israel gives a flying one about deterring the spread of Islam into Europe – all that interests them is preserving their own illegally-obtained borders.