On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:46:53PM +0100, Alessandro Pezzoni wrote:
> > `ghc-paths` used to be in [extra]/[community] at some point, I wonder
> > why it was removed.
>> I tried adding it to habs but I couldn't do that, because it is
> already there as a base package. I can't remove it either without
> removing all its dependants first.
> Should I leave this alone until we figure out why it was removed?
I've just made an attempt at adding ghc-paths to [haskell], but I
failed because [extra]/[community] is broken:
- one of the packages that depend on ghc-paths also depends on
deepseq, and
- deepseq is gone from [extra]/[community], so I added it too to
[haskell], but
- one of the packages that depend on deepseq also depends on text, and
- text in [extra]/[community] depend on deepseq
This effectively prevents me from fixing [haskell] until
[extra]/[community] is fixed!
This episode has made me consider whether the tight dependency between
[haskell] and [extra]/[community] should be broken in the future.
/M
--
Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
email: magnus at therning.org jabber: magnus at therning.org
twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid with
millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural
integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves.
-- Alan Kay
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/attachments/20131012/9f2c0f1c/attachment.sig>