Friday, October 2, 2015

With the possible entrance of China into the Syrian crisis, a spate of recent articles has appeared in various media outlets discussing the importance of Uyghur terrorism in China and the effect those acts may have on its decision whether or not to truly commit troops or other means of assistance to the Syrian government. These discussions, however, have typically been superfluous and tangential, rarely attributing the importance of the connections between the Syrian crisis and the Xinjang Uyghur separatist movement.

While many might suspect at first glance that the two crises are unrelated, the fact is that the same powers that control the savages raping and beheading their way across Syria also control the Uyghur “separatists” wreaking havoc in Xinjang China.

Indeed, Uyghur terrorists have been playing an increasingly large role in Syria. Aside from fighting in and alongside terrorists from other locations, Uyghurs have also fought in their own Uyghur brigades.

The Settler Issue

Jisr al-Shughour, a town located in Idlib province in Syria and about twelve miles away from the border with Turkey, has been the scene of at least two massacres by Western-backed terrorists – one in 2011 and the other occurring this year in 2015. In the second massacre, most of the killers were Chechen. However, after the massacre of the indigenous Syrians took place, hundreds of Uyghur families were moved in to “resettle” the town. As Afraa Dagher, a political analyst from Syria wrote,

2PM Sunday September 27, 2015 at Dag Hammarskjold Plaza, Near UN at East 47 Street Between First & Second Avenues, New York City

Come help us welcome the leading statesman in the world today, a friend and benefactor of the American people who prevented a general war in September 2013 by neutralizing the Saudi-Turkish staged provocation known as the Ghouta chemical weapons incident. Putin has worked to prevent the NATO-manufactured Ukraine crisis from spinning out of control. He is here seeking real American cooperation in the struggle to preserve civilization against the Turkish-backed ISIS-ISIL-IS-Daesh-Caliphate genocide organization. He deserves to get that cooperation. With most of the US peace movement sold out to regime change, humanitarian bombing and the Kiev regime, it’s up to Americans of intelligence and good will to make their voices heard. Come and help us show Obama what to do next!

Additional demonstrations Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday at 5pm, Dag Hammarskjold Plaza near UN. Stop by and be world-historical after work!

Join Tax Wall Street Party In Welcoming Putin The Peacemaker To New York City Sunday 2pm; Meeting Of Russian President With Obama Must Succeed In Coordinating Action Against ISIS And Cooling Off Kiev Extremists; US Should Lift Economic Sanctions On Russia, Syria, Iran; Merkel Leads Europe In Clamor For End To Syrian Civil War And Refugee Crisis; TWSP Was Key Catalyst In Fall Of Phony Warrior And ISIS Czar Allen; Rumblings Of Military Rule From US Deep State; Reactionary Boehner Ousted By Freedom Caucus Fascists; President Xi’s Elitist State Neo-liberalism Helped Cause China’s Bubble Economy; TWSP Continues Dialogue With Pope Francis On World Economic Recovery, Neo-Malthusianism And Pragmatism

With A Report On The New Greek Government From Michael Chiotinis In Athens

Amidst the incessant polling of the ongoing primary election contests, one recent poll stood out by asking respondents whether or not they would support a military coup d’état in the United States. As it turned out, 29% considered supporting such an illegal and unconstitutional military takeover as within the realm of possibility. We can take some comfort in the fact that 41% of those responding said they would never support a military coup. The poll concluded:

“Almost a third of Americans could imagine supporting a military coup against their own government, according to a new poll. The YouGov survey showed 29% of Americans could imagine supporting a coup. Yet, 41% said they could not imagine supporting such an event…..The overall numbers increased when participants were ‘asked whether they would hypothetically support the military stepping in to take control from a civilian government which is beginning to violate the constitution.’ 43% said yes to this, and 29% said no.”[i]

But the big issue here is why was such a poll ever conducted? Who commissioned it? Was it ordered up by a clique of ambitious and disgruntled military men eager to redeem their defeats on the battlefield with some kind of seizure of power here in the United States? Up to now, we do not know these answers.

However, it is clear from numerous media items that powerful forces, most likely the ruling class, invisible government, rogue state, or deep state, as the case may be, is considering making changes in the way the United States and the United Kingdom in particular are governed. This is a development which ought to cause grave concern.

A recent poll conducted by YouGov revealed that a sizeable portion of the American public is open to the idea of a military coup in the United States. The poll was conducted amid the continual polling that takes place during the U.S. Presidential election yet it did not focus on the elections per se, but the potential lack of elections in the future.

The YouGov poll surveyed 1,000 people online and determined that 29% of Americans, over a quarter of the population, could imagine supporting a military coup against the civilian government. Only 41% could not imagine supporting a coup.

The numbers supporting a potential coup were highest among Republicans with 43% of them saying they could envision supporting a coup, 29% of independents followed, with Democrats trailing at 20%.

The numbers apparently increased in support when the question asked “whether they would hypothetically support the military stepping in to take control from a civilian government which is beginning to violate the constitution.”

Critics of the polls have suggested that the method used to conduct the survey was largely unscientific and not a reasonable representation of an accurate sampling of the general American public.

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Brandon discusses the new Japan security bills and return to imperialism of the Japanese state, the Syrian Crisis, Russia, China, and the potential for conflict between the world's major powers in Syria.

In 1948, during the Nakba, or Palestinian Exodus, the Palestinian tragedy began in earnest. Palestinian Refugees were spread out all over the world but most were divided between Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

Today there is another tragedy of displacement – Syria. Since 2011, the year of the color revolution and destabilization, engineered and designed by Israel and the West, Syrian society and the population as a whole has been torn apart.

For instance, Jisr al-Shoghour, a town located in Idlib province and about twelve miles from the Turkish border, was the scene of a horrible massacre. Here, the so-called peaceful protesters attacked a Syrian military security checkpoint. Soldiers were beheaded, many of them struck on the head with an axe, their bodies so badly damaged, a DNA test was necessary to determine who they actually were.

Our government organized a tour to a mass grave of Syrian soldiers who had been killed by foreign-backed “rebels,” including Uighurs, in Jisr al-Shoghour that was attended by a number of foreign diplomats. One of the attendees was former US Ambassador to Syria, Robert Ford.

Friday, September 25, 2015

More than an at any other time in the Syrian crisis, the situation on the ground presents an incredible threat to international peace and security. Indeed, the Western-backed plot to overthrow the secular government of Bashar al-Assad has now placed the world in a precarious position where two nuclear powers are acting in such close proximity to one another militarily that one trigger happy soldier could now plunge the globe into a nuclear holocaust.

If the general public of Russia and the West are not aware of the dangers of further meddling in the Middle East by the United States and NATO, the state actors of the two sides are clearly aware of the potential ramifications. Of course, it cannot go without mentioning that the entire confrontation now taking place in Syria between the United States, NATO, and Russia is entirely the making of the West since it was NATO and the U.S. that created the crisis to begin with.

As the military chess pieces continue to be set across the world, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has already stated that the United States should engage in bi-lateral military-to-military communication with Russia over military operations in Syria in order to avoid “unintended incidents.”

While Lavrov did not spell out exactly what he meant by “unintended incidents,” his meaning was clear – “unintended incidents” are a direct military confrontation between the United States/NATO and Russian forces.

The situation is heating up in Syria yet again. If reports coming from Almasdar News are accurate, another troop deployment will soon be about to take place – in addition to the 2,000 Russian troops who arrived earlier this week. This time, however, the troops are coming from China.

On September 23, Leith Fadel of Almasdar news (the Arab Source), reported that China has now decided to commit troops and military aircraft to Syria within the next six weeks. Although the reports have not been independently confirmed, the outlet cited a senior Syrian officer in the Syrian military for the claims regarding the Chinese plans. Fadel’s information has proven accurate many times in the past.

On Tuesday morning, a Chinese naval vessel reportedly traveled through Egypt’s Suez Canal to enter the Mediterranean Sea; its destination was not confirmed.

However, according to a senior officer in the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) that is stationed inside the Syrian coastal city of Latakia, Chinese military personnel and aerial assets are scheduled to arrive in the coming weeks (6 weeks) to the port-city of Tartous – he could not provide anymore detail.

Russia has made it abundantly clear that they are taking an active role in this conflict, but the news of the Chinese military to Syria provides more insight into their contingency.

Over the past week, things haven’t been going as well as they normally do for the Western-backed terrorists who have raped and beheaded their way across Syria for the last four years. Likewise, the Western plot to overthrow Assad and replace him with chaos and a weak jihadist/impotent government over four years ago has gone from a quagmire to the beginnings of a reversal.

One such example of how the resistance of the Syrian people and the Assad government, the assistance of the Iranians and Hezbollah, and, of course, the new Russian involvement is already beginning to produce results is the report that the Syrian Arab Army’s 67th Brigade of the 18th Tank Division has captured the Palmyra-Teefor Airbase Road.

The SAA victory came with close coordination between Hezbollah, National Defense Forces, and Ba’ath Battalions.

According to Leith Fadel of Syrian Perspective and Almasdar news, sources have reported that the SAA now controls the entirety of the road from the outskirts of Palmyra all the way to the Teefor (t-4) Airbase. Teefor had been under attack from jihadists for over two months but such attacks were successfully repelled by the SAA forces stationed at the base.

The SAA and Lebanese Resistance forces are now positioned just on the outskirts of Palmyra after having been successful at seizing the hilltop at Tal Syria Tel, west of Palmyra and also at the Western outskirts of the Qassioun Mountains.

Carly Fiorina, whose birth name is Cara Carleton Sneed, claims that she started as a secretary and heroically rose to become a CEO of Hewlett Packard. Republican candidates seeking to dupe their gullible supporters and mask their dubious personal backgrounds often tout this typical Horatio Alger rags-to-riches story. Carly Fiorina is no exception to this pattern however her personality is saturated with this lie and many others as well as exhibiting signs of insanity that only comes from being attached at the hip to the intelligence establishment.

Fiorina’s father was Joseph Tyree Sneed, III who would become the dean of Duke University School of Law, a Deputy Attorney General, and a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Readers are reminded that the only judicial level higher than the circuit appellate court is the Supreme Court; this would make Carly’s father an incredibly influential and well-connected individual. Carly went to the posh all-girls Channing School in London and then to Stanford University. It is likely that Carly’s story of starting as a humble secretary came as a result of her father pressuring her to taking up a job with Kelly Girls, which she did during the summer as a student at Stanford. After dropping out of law school at UCLA and she moved on to business school and then to her well publicized career as an asset stripper and wrecker of companies like Lucent and Hewlett-Packard.

It was allegedly only after the board of directors at Hewlett-Packard fired her that Carly came into the orbit of the intelligence community, but some are skeptical. She had previously provided services for the Pentagon through an unpaid position on the Defense Business Board. But her breakthrough came when she was picked by the infamous war criminal Michael Hayden to lead the CIA’s External Advisory Board. The National Review reported:

Wednesday, September 23, 2015

It was revealed on September 22 that Barack Obama’s hand-picked ISIS Czar, disgraced Gen. John Allen, will be leaving his post in the coming weeks. The information was transmitted to the Bloomberg View from four separate administration officials who said that the White House was not ready to announce Allen’s resignation officially but that the twice disgraced General would be stepping down in early November.

Karin Von Hippel, Allen’s Chief Of Staff, will also be resigning according to reports.

ISIS Czar Allen’s reputation has been marred by controversy and scandal as well as an attempt to push the United States into further direct military involvement in Syria, particularly against the one fighting force that actually opposed ISIS – i.e. the Syrian government.

After assuming command of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, Allen was swept up in the David Petreaus/Paul Broadwell scandal where his own communications with Jill Kelley, a Lebanese-American socialite who possibly had connections to rival factions of the intelligence community networks. Allen “resigned” from his command and retired from the military after the scandal but he was brought back by Obama not even a year later when he was named as the Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition Against ISIL, also known as Obama’s ISIS Czar.

Despite what the internet might tell you, self-admitted pedophile Todd Nickerson is not a hero, and is not a man to admire.

Nickerson wrote a lengthy op-ed on Salon.com, where he “came out” as a pedophile … but claims that because he’s never inappropriately touched a child or used child pornography, it’s much, much worse for him than it is for you. Or, you know, your children.

He also has the sickening gall to claim that pedophilia is a “sexual orientation” … which would indicate that he considers being an adult who’s attracted to children a normal thing, as sexual urges toward any other adult, gender notwithstanding, is acceptable. But it’s not.

He continues trying to rationalize his disorder, using childlike words and playing the sympathy card, saying he lost a hand when he was young and struggled with bladder problems growing up, which he said took a debilitating toll on his self-esteem. He even reveals that he, himself, was molested by an adult at a young age.

Nickerson claims that the farthest he’s gone is to join a pedophile forum on the internet … but unapologetically claims that it’s all innocent, and no illegal activities ensue as a result — or in spite — of the forum. He says that it’s been an abhorrent struggle, all these years of wanting to have sex with children, and sometimes doesn’t even see the benefit of “staying legal.”

Here is the face-saving formula used by US Secretary of State Kerry in London today to signal that the United States is finally jettisoning the absurd and utopian demand that Syrian President Assad’s immediate removal from power be a precondition for negotiating a political settlement for Syria. Kerry stated: “Our focus remains on destroying ISIL and also on a political settlement with respect to Syria, which we believe cannot be achieved with the long-term presence of Assad,” Mr. Kerry said. “But we’re looking for ways in which to try to find a common ground. Clearly, if you’re going to have a political settlement, which we’ve always argued is the best and only way to resolve Syria, you need to have conversations with people, and you need to find a common ground.” which we’ve always argued is the best and only way to resolve Syria, you need to have conversations with people, and you need to find a common ground.”[i]

If Assad must depart in the long term, this implies that his short-term and medium-term presence is feasible. This opens the space needed for serious diplomacy and negotiations, which Europe is demanding to stop the Syrian civil war, the driving force behind the refugee crisis. It is expected that a number of European nations will soon end economic sanctions against Syria, re-open their shuttered embassies, and begin cooperating with the legal Assad government.

One key background element for this evident Russian-US convergence comes from veteran reporter Robert Parry, who says a source told him of some preconcert between Putin and Obama:

Brandon announces his new book The Difference It Makes: 36 Reasons Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. He also discusses the European immigration crisis (who is behind it and why), the solutions to the crisis, the potential for WW3 in Syria, and the recent Japanese decision to return to the use of its military for imperialist purposes.

As the conflict in Syria continues to escalate, it has been reported by Russian media that Russian Marines stationed at an airbase in Latakia have now engaged ISIS fighters in direct combat.

According to Russian news website, Segodnia, ISIS militants attempted to ambush the Russian soldiers stationed at the base but were fought off by the Russian marines, with a number of ISIS fighters being killed and some captured.

Russian military activity has been increasing at the airbase near Latakia over recent days with the arrival of new and advanced Russian fighter jets, according to reports.

Combat between Russian forces and ISIS militants mark a drastic increase in the level of conflict in Syria, adding an even greater international aspect to it as well. With Russia now openly providing the Assad government with missiles, missile defense systems, advisers, helicopters, satellite imagery, and fighter jets (particularly those being flown by Russian pilots), the Russians now stand directly in opposition to the United States pilots, jet fighters, and special forces operatives on the ground in Syria supporting the death squads (even if the official U.S. line is publicly opposed to ISIS and supportive of “moderate” cannibals).

Monday, September 21, 2015

Activist Post writer, Brandon Turbeville, has just released his seventh book: The Difference It Makes: 36 Reasons Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. Brandon is known for his detailed research, principally in the area of Geopolitics, color revolutions, the Middle East and, specifically, Syria. In his new book, however, Turbeville lists at least 36 aspects of Clinton’s career in an attempt to demonstrate why Hillary Clinton should never be considered as a serious candidate for President.

Turbeville is apt to point out that the book is not entirely comprehensive, stating that it could have been twice as long since the list of Hillary Clinton’s crimes are so vast that an author would spend years compiling them all together. But the goal, Turbeville says, was to get the book out before the primaries in order to try and head off what he deems a “worst case scenario” before it had a chance to grow out of control.

In his introduction to the book, Turbeville writes:

It is vitally important to understand that this book is by no means an endorsement of any other candidate in the political race for the Presidency. It is merely designed to inform and educate. Until Americans are truly aware of the issues they face and the legitimate solutions necessary to repair the American economy, restore living standards, return civil liberties and the like, America will be given false choices like Hillary Clinton versus the Republican nomination.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

A bill that has caused so much protest and demonstration all across Japan in recent weeks has now passed the Japanese Parliament. The so-called “defense and security bills” eliminate constraints placed on the use of the Japanese military imposed by the Japanese Constitution, signaling Japan’s biggest foreign policy shift since the post-war military was created.

A main component of the new laws is an end to the ban on the “right of collective self-defense,” defending another country, particularly the United States, if it were to come under attack, or in instances where Japan faces a “threat to its survival,” i.e. where Japan must “defend its national interests.”

Under the Japanese Constitution, the Japanese military could only be used in cases of self-defense, hence the designation of “self- defense army.” Those restrictions have largely been removed as a result of the passage of the new bills.

The bills had already passed the lower house of the Japanese Parliament and were passed by the upper house in the early hours of Saturday.

Over the past few weeks, Japan has been the scene of massive protests taking place all across the country. The impetus for the protests is a new policy being promoted by the Japanese government that would effectively allow for the use of Japan’s military abroad and in the service of what many would describe as imperialist agendas.

The new “security bills” being promoted by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe are at the heart of the recent protests due to the fact that many Japanese see their ultimate passage as a major step toward the return of an imperialist Japan and a country that will soon be using its military in conflicts abroad.

The bills would allow for the use of the Japanese military outside of its national borders in order to “protect Japan’s national interests,” an extremely broad term that may allow for aggressive military actions and imperialism. It may very well allow the military to act as a willing participant in the imperialism of other nations as well, most notably the United States. Indeed, Americans should know well how allowing terms like “protecting national interests” can be used to justify wars of aggression, the slaughter of innocent people abroad, and the destruction of sovereign nations across the globe.

Japan’s Constitution, as codified after the Japanese defeat in World War 2, specifies that its army can only operate for the purposes of self-defense. Indeed, the overwhelming majority of Japanese Constitutional scholars agree that the new laws are unconstitutional. Article 9, which provides much of the basis of the prohibition on aggressive military force reads, “the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes.”

Amidst the hysteria of dyed in the wool warmongers, the Obama White House is approaching a rapprochement with Russia regarding the Syrian Civil War crisis. According to an article published by Fox News on Sept. 17,

“…the Obama administration plans to accept an offer from Russia for direct talks on its military buildup in Syria that U.S. officials believe is aimed at propping up Syrian President Bashar Assad.”

This offer, initiated by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov — who has consistently been open to conferring with Western countries in foreign policy matters — was made to Secretary of State John Kerry earlier this week. Skull and Bones Kerry is showing unexpected goodwill in agreeing to hold talks between the US and Russia, saying he personally thought the idea was a good one. The report by Fox continued,

“Kerry said Lavrov had proposed a ‘military-to-military conversation and meeting in order to discuss the issue of precisely what will be done to de-conflict with respect to any potential risks that might be run and have a complete and clear understanding as to the road ahead and what the intentions are.’”[1]

The White House has been claiming to be “perplexed” by the recent Russian military buildup in Syria and these talks are an opportunity to have a clearer picture of the intentions of Russia. An Associated Press article published on Sept 16 quoted Secretary Kerry and reported the following,

“It is vital to avoid misunderstandings, miscalculations (and) not to put ourselves in a predicament where we are supposing something and the supposition is wrong.”

Nevertheless, Kerry is still demanding that Assad must be removed from power,

Yesterday’s summit conference of the Collective Security Treaty Organization Council in Dushanbe, Tadjikistan has set into motion the machinery which will lead to a formal diplomatic demarche at the United Nations Security Council during the yearly session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York City in about 12 to 14 days. This demarche will express the intent of the CSTO member states Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kirghizistan, and Tadjikistan to send military forces to Syria to fight against terrorist groups, starting with the organization variously known as ISIS, ISIL, IS, the Islamic State, and the Caliphate. The proposed military intervention would be conducted on precisely the same juridical basis as the current operations of the United States led coalition, which has been rendered ineffective in its operations by the internal sabotage of the Petraeus-Allen faction. The CSTO proposes a more vigorous struggle against terrorists of all stripes, free from the ulterior motives which have plagued the US effort.

Thierry Meyssan’s Voltaire Network has provided the following dispatch from the conference site:

“Meeting in Dushanbe (Tadjikistan) on the 15th September 2015, the heads of the member states of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) strongly denounced terrorism in Iraq and Syria, particularly that of the phony Islamic Emirate (« Daesh »). The heads of the member states of the CSTO stated that their organization could now deploy under the auspices of the UNO, in the same way as NATO. They agreed to coordinate their interventions at the UNO General Assembly at the end of September, with the aim of creating a global Coalition against terrorism. The CSTO includes Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kirghizistan, and Tadjikistan. Russia is to preside over the UN Security Council during the month of September 2015. In June 2012, during the Geneva Conference, President Putin had considered deploying the CSTO in Syria, but France restarted the war before the Organization was ready.”[i]

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Adding to the voices of numerous researchers, activists, and now world leaders who are calling out the United States for its open support of terrorists and terrorism in Syria as well as its poorly-veiled support for ISIS, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad spoke out about the US terrorist connection as well as the refugee crisis currently unfolding in Europe.

In an interview with RT, Assad noted that Europe was “not dealing with the cause” of the crisis and that Syrians merely desire peace and security.

Assad stated “It’s not about that Europe didn’t accept them or embrace them as refugees, it’s about not dealing with the cause. If you are worried about them, stop supporting terrorists. That’s what we think regarding the crisis. This is the core of the whole issue of refugees.”

"If we ask any Syrian today about what they want, the first thing they would say - 'We want security and safety for every person and every family,” he added.

Assad suggested that all political forces should unite around what the Syrian people want, seeming to suggest that these forces should enter into dialogue with one another and reach mutually agreed upon solutions for moving forward.

Assad spoke highly of the diverse society that is (was) Syria, saying that all Syrians, of every ethnicity and sect, are a part of Syria and the “fabric” of what makes Syria the country it is (was).

Assad stated that political consensus must be reached between political forces in Syria but, first, terrorism must be defeated.

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

The policy of phony war against ISIS pursued by the United States over the past year under the influence of ISIS Czar John Allen has now turned into a neocon’s nightmare in the form of a growing Russian military presence in Syria. International attention is now concentrated on the new Russian base, complete with airfield, in the vicinity of Latakia, not far from the Mediterranean. The world is also waiting for the very likely abortive attempt by the same neocons to prevent ISIS and the other terrorist rebel formations from being destroyed before they can be sent to Iran or indeed deployed against Russia. In reality, the new Russian role is beneficial to the US and the world, since it increases the probability that the ISIS threat to world civilization can be defeated.

Today’s New York Times offers more details about the impressive array of Russian military hardware now being marshaled in the Latakia area for use against the jihadis:

“Russia has sent some of its most modern battle tanks to a new air base in Syria in what American officials said on Monday was part of an escalating buildup that could give Moscow its most significant military foothold in the Middle East in decades. Pentagon officials said that the Russian weapons and equipment that had arrived suggested that the Kremlin’s plan is to turn the airfield south of Latakia in western Syria into a major hub that could be used to bring in military supplies for the government of President Bashar al-Assad. It might also serve as a staging area for airstrikes in support of Syrian government forces. American military specialists analyzing satellite photographs and other information said Russia had about half a dozen T-90 tanks, 15 howitzers, 35 armored personnel carriers, 200 marines and housing for as many as 1,500 personnel at the airfield near the Assad family’s ancestral home. And more is on the way as Russia appears to be attempting to increase its influence in Syria amid the civil strife there, the officials said…. At least 15 giant Russian Condor transport planes have in the past week used an air corridor over Iraq and Iran to ferry military equipment and personnel to the base…. The buildup also dramatizes Russia’s call to fight the Islamic State with a new coalition that would include Iran and the Syrian government.”[i]

When observing the tragic humanitarian crisis that has fully engulfed virtually all of Europe as a result of the mass migration of people from war-torn and third world countries, many may be prompted to wonder just how all of these refugees came to take part in a mass exodus at the same time as if they were acting on cue. After all, the Syrian crisis has been unfolding for 4-5 years now and the Libyan crisis even longer still. Other countries have found themselves on the wrong end of NATO but, until now, we have not seen the massive migration such as that taking place across Europe today and very soon to include the United States.

After all, if the Syrian refugees were escaping Syria because of Assad’s cruelty, why did we not witness an immigration crisis in 2008? 2009? 2010? In fact, why have we not seen such a mass exodus until now?

While there has been increased pressure on dislocated Syrians as a result of an ISIS push West, it must be pointed out that a great number of the refugees streaming into Europe are not Syrian at all.

It must also be pointed out that much of the emigration from Turkey seems to have taken place at the behest of Turkish intelligence and Turkish officials. In other words, it appears that Turkey may have helped engineer the buildup of thousands upon thousands of refugees within its own borders until the appropriate time where they would release and push them toward Europe.

The Buildup And Deployment

As Tony Cartalucci points out in his article, “Social Engineering 101: How To Make A Refugee Crisis,” Turkey has “suspiciously maintained a very enthusiastic "open door" policy for refugees, spending inexplicable sums of money and political capital in accommodating them.” Cartalucci finds this policy suspicious because the Turks clearly have no concern for the welfare of the Syrian people. After years of training, arming, coordinating, directing, and facilitating ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other “moderate” cannibals to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dead civilians, unthinkable atrocities, and the displacement of much of the country, Turkey may care about many things but the welfare of the Syrian people is not one of them.

Monday, September 14, 2015

What has well-known amongst informed observers for quite some time is now becoming so obvious that it is almost impossible to hide except from the most gullible members of the general public – that fact the United States is not only not interested in fighting ISIS, but they are actively protecting and shielding it.

In truth, the US relationship with ISIS goes much deeper since the US created, armed, and trained the terrorist organization from its inception for the purpose of destroying the secular government of Bashar al-Assad and providing a boogeyman for the fearful masses back home to justify a greater police state and foreign military adventurism.

So far, only select members of the alternative media have successfully exposed the US role in the creation and support of ISIS. Undoubtedly, the directors and controllers of the Western mainstream press know much more than what they pretend to understand, and certainly much more than what they print. Foreign governments, silent as they may be, are also clearly aware of who created this terrorist threat and why.

Now, however, some state actors are becoming bolder when it comes to calling out the nature of the Syrian crisis, aside from the Assad government who has been calling out the United States and NATO for years on the issue.

Only recently, Sergei Lavrov called out the United States for not only having ulterior motives when it comes to alleged “campaign against ISIS,” but also in the protection that the U.S. has provided for ISIS fighters on the ground.

In an interview with Voskresnoye Vermya (Sunday Time) on Russia’s Channel One, Lavrov stated “Analyzing the actions of coalition member states, one cannot but suspect they have ulterior motives beyond the stated goal of fighting the Islamic State.

The absurd and discredited policy of the Obama administration on Syria, which constantly demands the ouster of President Assad, even though he is the only factor of stability in the country and the only force capable of finally destroying ISIS, is now collapsing under the weight of its own irrationality. At the same time, important forces in Europe have concluded that Russian military engagement in favor of Assad is now the most likely way to end the fighting.

The European actions of recent days have been spurred on by the refugee crisis now gripping the continent, which has created a sense of emergency in the various governments. In particular, many European capitals have been shocked by the latest United Nations report, which predicts up to 1 million additional refugees coming from Syria before the end of this year. The US-led phony war against ISIS has failed to prevent the refugee crisis.

The policy which is now collapsing has been decisively influenced on the US side by the harebrained schemer ISIS Czar John Allen (officially Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS), a leading member of the Petraeus-Allen clique of neocon warmonger generals, who have always seen the Syrian conflict as a way to engineer confrontation with Russia and Iran. Now that the Iran nuclear accord is in the process of being institutionalized, Allen’s previous blackmail strategy against the Obama White House has fallen through, and the possibility of his final ouster is drawing near. These current developments can also become a bitter defeat for the neocon faction in general, provided that Obama can be made to see the light.
Merkel Wants Russian Presence in Syria

German Chancellor Angela Merkel made clear that she is reversing her field, stating on Saturday in Berlin that, in order to end the Syrian conflict and to successfully conclude the struggle against the extremist Islamic State, “we need both cooperation with the United States of America, and at the same time, cooperation with Russia – otherwise there will be no solution.”