While it seems you caught on to your mistake, please don't make a separate post with the link. Instead, edit the original post (the "edit" command is under the "options" tab on your post), then insert your link.

Right away, I see that the titles from each section are not bolded. I would review the How to Write An SCP guide under the "Formatting" tab for Wikidot formatting things, including bolding words/sentences.

To compensate for effects should an instance be damaged

I would probably reword the last half of this to read: "…if an instance becomes damaged, …" replacing "…should an instance be damaged, …". To me at least, it seemed like the original was worded weirdly.

(SCP-3278-A,B,C, respectively)

"…A, B, and C, respectively)"

All 548 samples of SCP-3278 were contained at the location of the █████ Electronics R/D department, after a destruction test of an instance of SCP-3278 destroyed the laboratory and surrounding rooms.

This part should go at the end of the description, or in another addendum.

This turbine is located in the instance in cellular models, and in the place of the cooling fan in laptop model.

I am rather confused on the laptop: the main characteristic of this battery is that it also has a turbine that is directly attached to it. However, the battery for the laptop also replaces the cooling fan?

(The next few pointers are about the testing logs)

The testing logs don't really reveal anything new about the skip in question, which should always be the goal of a testing log.

Others may feel differently about them, but the comments on every test are unnecessary imo. To me, it's trying to use something that has been long retired.

Why not use a D-Class instead of an intern for that last test?

Additional Description
SCP-3278 is the designation given to Foundation attempts to create a similar “battery” on a larger scale.

Why though? You don't give any explanation for this.

are capable of producing thirty thousand (30,000) volts

Just say 30,000 volts.

Overall, it is definitely written competently for the most part. However, there isn't really anything special about the skip in question: it's a battery that implodes if you don't handle it properly. Generally, you need to have some sort of storytelling element for your SCP to succeed.

The biggest piece of advice I can give to you is this: when you go back to revise your skip, try to think of a story you could tell with your object, then include it with the article.

Thanks for the feedback!
1) It is an incident report about an intern carrying it back to containment, and tripping; why would the Foundation just hand one of these things to a D-class?
2) I will reform the format.
3) I will add an explanation for SCP-????-D's existence.
4) The testing logs were my way of demonstrating the destructive capabilities, but i've gotten rid of the comments
I'll be continuously working on this, and any critique is helpful.

Actually, I sort of thought about the logistics of that: why would highly doubt the Foundation would give a highly fragile, highly explosive SCP to an intern? Why not let highly trained professionals that are available to the foundation do that? That way, nothing like this is possible.

Everybody trips now and then; one person could miss a step, pulling the other guys carrying the thing with them. Everybody screws up, albeit far less commonly with trained personnel. I was going for a "researchers-can't-be-bothered-to-organize-a-MTF-to-carry-the-thing-and-just-use-the-intern" thing. I'm editing it to state that the higher the charge is, the more strain the vacuum chamber is under, making it easier to break.

I would advise against it, as it seems rather Lolfoundation-like (Lolfoundation meaning researchers acting irresponsibly for the sake of comedy. While it was used in older articles, it is generally frowned upon nowadays.).

I did not mean lolfoundation either (I've been lurking on the site a while, and only recently got the account, i've read a good sampling.); this would be a terrible event with no comedic value, but i'll drop it.
Thanks for the feedback