Monthly Archives: March 2014

There are a broad number of efforts to move humanity in the direction of what the technocrats label: the singularity, where humans merge with machines and evolution is accelerated past comprehension, because biological evolution moves at such a slow pace the ones who supposedly take the initiative to auto-accommodate technologically will surge forward, and leave everyone else behind giving them a powerful edge relative to the rest.

The present move toward the singularity, what top scientists are calling inevitable is being sold as a good thing, the obvious next step in our progress, the ability to control our own evolution, to reach closer to that constant goal of improved health, longer lives, and godlike abilities.

what is the cost of achieving such an end? and what are the social implications in the long run if this is pursued to its full extent?

First, the romanticizing of the great and fabled ‘singularity’ has to be removed. This is, in fact the post industrial, neo-feudal era that is discussed by academics, futurists, and technocrats–the end of our way of life, the literal end to the constitutional republic, the end of personal liberty, the shedding of all the ‘old ideas’ that allegedly weigh humanity down.

The technocracy, what will fill the political, and economic vacuum filled by a catastrophic collapse of society, is the natural consequence of this desired outcome to create a society so saturated with technology that literally every single aspect of life is documented in some fashion, tracked by some panopticon, an omnipresent ultra voyeur cataloging actions, thoughts, and perhaps intents–if those ‘intents’ are considered negative by some logic code arbitrarily input in the ‘social stability’ database then red flags appear in a given sector, and the possible threat is removed.

Technology is not inherently bad. It can’t, by definition be anything but what it is designed to do. Software, is essentially a theory. This goes for any inanimate objects. The theory of the singularity is that programs will become so fast, intricate that they will develop a consciousness, and through the future ‘internet of things’ will be able to, through their own initiative construct a parallel society more efficiently than humans will be able to.

The scientific experts, who are on the cutting edge will have the upper hand, and will be able to preempt the singularity by proactively merging themselves when the forecast for the approximate time–the big moment will happen.

Almost instantly as a result of this merger, the unwashed masses, stuck in their mega region urban population centers outlined on the America2050 website will remain static while the elites literally transcend dimensions toward their fabled auto-deistic fetish.

From the America2050 website they describe the destruction of sovereignty and the tenth amendment with the alleged inevitability of ‘megaregions’:

“As metropolitan regions continued to expand throughout the second half of the 20th century their boundaries began to blur, creating a new scale of geography now known as the megaregion. Interlocking economic systems, shared natural resources and ecosystems, and common transportation systems link these population centers together. As continued population growth and low density settlement patterns place increasing pressure on these systems, there is greater impetus to coordinate policy at this expanded scale. Most of the nation’s rapid population growth, and an even larger share of its economic expansion, is expected to occur in 11 megaregions: large networks of metropolitan regions, each megaregion covering thousands of square miles and located in every part of the country.
The megaregions of the United States are defined by layers of relationships that together define a common interest; this common interest, in turn, forms the basis for policy decisions.”

The question arises if this is truly possible. Many are optimistic about a future where robots are so advanced that manual labor will be non existent. There is already a push to eliminate the service industry jobs, which make up most of the economy in the United States, accounting for 68 % of US GDP. 4 out of 5 jobs are from the service industry, according to the United States Trade Representatives website.

One only has to study the ProjectAvatar2045 website for a complete outline of future plans by technocratic elites to install a global government, and create a tech system that could empower a few, and enslave the many. This website is really just a futurist blueprint for technocratic slavery, with its mention of a ‘global congress’, it is definitely a paradigm shift for the worst dressed up as a glamorous trendy and ‘liberal’ utopia.

Automatons are rapidly being integrated into the various areas of the military-industrial complex. DARPA is developing many battle-ready autonomous robots, which can perform many different tasks like rendering aid, or killing enemies.

The service industry is integrating automation at an accelerated pace partly for the customer’s convenience, and partly because workers are increasingly being seen as an unnecessary liability. The news media, manufacturing, grocery, restaurants and telecommunications fields have already embraced autonomous robots.

For many years, factories have taken the lead in developing assembly line robots to replace humans. In grocery stores, the cashier is being replaced with ‘self-service stations’; one attendant operates 6 to 8 machines. In Japan, robot waiters are taking customer’s orders in restaurants. There will be no election or debate about this slow and subtle process.

Conversely if true Artificial Intelligence is really just a fast program that actually can’t think for itself, exhibiting creativity like humans, if it is just a pipe-dream, how will that affect the elites who have a vested interest in the advancement of such technologies? Presumably would it be possible for them to create the illusion that there are machines so advanced that they must naturally take their place in the hypothetical technocratic caste system above humans?

The advancements being made in law enforcement with what is termed as ‘intelligence-led’ policing is really the foundation for a system where technology can be considered superior to human liberties, and creativity–what will soon be considered the antiquated concept of a human’s ‘free will’, the philosophy that is now being phased out of progressive ideology that mankind has the ability to control its own destiny.

The human has been reduced to nothing but an animal, thanks to the theory of natural selection, the abolition of the belief that homo sapiens possess some divine spark bestowed upon them by the creator of the universe.

Moving forward, the humans are even being knocked down from that position of simple animalistic nature, further reduced to the biological androids that science has granted itself the privilege of classification in regard to these poor creatures, conditioned to be slaves.

Bill Joy, in an article in Wired Magazine, describes an encounter with inventor genius Ray Kurzweil, who is the prophet of the singularity transhumanist movement. There was a conference on artificial intelligence and Mr. Joy got caught in the discussion between Kurzweil and another person, a philosopher about computers being autonomous. The philosopher disagreed, echoing Noam Chomsky’s argument against AI systems being able to become so advanced that they are conscious beings.

Kurzweil, who is currently the top engineer at Google, a man obsessed to becoming god, who refuses to accept death, and who is apparently very charismatic, was able to convince Bill Joy, who admitted that the idea of autonomous robots is something out of a Sci-Fi novel, that it is not only possible, but inevitable.

The key here in the article by Bill Joy, with reference to Ray Kurzweil is the suggestion that humans will becoming inescapably dependent on computers, so much that they will be completely inseparable; the computers will eventually do all the thinking for humans, planning out their days, and making various life-related suggestions. The computers will have such an insight into human life, with their tracking and analysis that their opinions will be much more valued than that of humans. Consciousness will be exported to computers, and speech will become less necessary. This is echoed in Brzezinski’s book Between Two Ages where he describes the process of human ‘progress’ in the world where language will be minimized as the world turns more toward globalization, the technocracy, Anglo-American order—new world order. Emotions, and images, Brzezinski suggests, will ultimately rule the expressive arena, not concrete terms which will enable debate, and dissent.

Ted Kaczynski, A.K.A., The Unabomber, A.K.A., ex math genius and CIA MK Ultra subject pretty much lost it, and started bombing various places, consumed with a Luddite frenzy. He was desperate to get his ideas out to warn the public of the coming scientific dictatorship, the literal rise of the machines that movies like Terminator illustrated so dramatically in the late great 80’s;

Kaczynski’s manifesto, surprisingly lucid, was presented to the New York Times and Washington Post. The editors were not exactly pleased to publish his writings, a disclaimer at the top of the article warns that the information contained in the article was only printed due to a desire to eliminate further bombings, the FBI, they state insisted it was a good idea.

The similarities between these two characters is bizarre as far as their thoughts concerning the inevitable rise of machines, mankind’s loving entry into the scientific dictatorship. Are they not both madmen in their own rights?

Kurzweil is a technocratic elitist who believes that society’s ills can be solved with the unconditional human technological merger, and the other believes that all technology no matter how you slice it has been an enormous danger to civilization and humanity in general–both polar opposites–maybe in some alternate reality, where society values the free exchange of ideas and the sharing of diverse opinions these two men could be involved in international live televised debates on pay-per-view, raising money for charity.

Technocrats have made their agenda clear, their concern is not with poverty, the human animal, if it is allowed to continue its existence will serve as a glorified energy conduit serving limited and mundane tasks–it is painstakingly clear their days are numbered, according to these psychopathic technocrats, who are literally the manifestation of the evil villain portrayed in the comic books.

Humanity is content to sell itself into indefinite slavery by pursuing endless technological upgrades to their holy ”devices”, the instruments that consistently lull them into a drooling moron mind-numbing apathy, while conversely these implements of scientific innovation could very well be used as tools of empowerment, instead of endless variations of ”Candy Crush Saga” recommended by friends on social media ad nauseum.

An urgent need exists for the public to peel off the infectious government love goggles. This anti-intellectualism has to stop. It became rampant during both of the Bush regimes, but honestly there was a lot of hope that the current regime, with the smooth, well-articulated drive toward the restoration of civil liberties would bring in a new era of enlightenment, this was pure naivety in retrospect considering all the humans rights violations–gitmo, for example.

Did everyone forget about the hunger strikes, and force feeding of inmates? What about the whole issue of closing down the concentration camp? It was allegedly designed, initially to house terrorism suspects, but just became a CIA torture hell pit, terrorist-training school.

This is just one of the many lawless aspects of the technocratic agenda, creating precedents for torture, justified by ‘terrorism’. It wasn’t right when they were persecuting Muslims, and it isn’t right to persecute Christians either.

Wasn’t the United States founded on religious tolerance? The looming threat of ‘terrorism’ justifies more illegal wars, on top of the hideous hegemonic insatiable gluttonous appetite of the multinational neo-colonialists who have usurped the ‘liberal’ and ‘progressive’ movements to ensure the public’s collective consciousness shuts down, tunes out, and continues to slurp up the decadent meaty liquid of popular culture readily dispensed via ubiquitous media sources, add the panopticon, a mass surveillance spy grid to the mix, the exploitation derived from an amped-up and unregulated emerging science like neuro economics, an innovative form of marketing that utilizes enhanced computer algorithms to map consumer behavior based on numerous variables, and a highly controlled, not to mention fixed situation manifests.

A recent article in Foreign Affairs, entitled ‘Colonialism’s Enduring Dividends’ by Bhaskar Chakravorti, Jianwei Dong, and Kate Fedosova argues that the United States isn’t taking advantage of the new colonialist business model of the future which promises to rake in billions for US corporations.

How the public is not expected to violently laugh and vomit at the same time is a bizarre mystery worthy of an alternate reality version of Sherlock Holmes, forced to investigate the nightmare landscape of the Twighlight Zone.

A malicious neo-colonialist agenda has been outlined clearly in government white papers, and academic reports through the guise of ‘liberalism’, egalitarianism, and a gross display of false altruistic concern.

Neo-colonialism is the practice of utilizing predatory capitalism in the underdeveloped nations, who have access to natural resources that the world is dependent on.

The corporatocracy is illustrated by John Perkins, former Chief Economist for Main Financial, in his book Confessions of an Economic Hitman. He describes his role at Main to provide exaggerated economic forecasts that would ensure inflated expenses to ensure that his company, and others like it would profit from lucrative contracts to ‘help’ build up the country’s infrastructure; he would attempt to convince the world leader on selling out their country’s future with massive World Bank and IMF loans that would be impossible to pay back.

The massive profits derived from these lucrative ventures go to corrupt above-the-law multinational corporations, while the people, exploited by their cheap labor and valuable resources are subjected to deeper levels of poverty.

If the economic hitmen were unable to negotiate with the leaders of that particular country, another character called ‘the jackal’ would move in and grant them an offer they couldn’t refuse, in true Godfather fashion. If the Jackal failed to deliver the desired results, the military would be sent in to redecorate–a new more cooperative dictator would replace the old guy who wasn’t a team player. The beauty of this system, Perkins relates, is that corporations can benefit from working with the government without regulations or congressional oversight.

It must be noted that the social institutions of government are not evil, but often have elements inside that operate with their own agenda, they lobby for the continued practice of launching a series of bloody, illegal wars, justified by preeminent protection measures against ‘terrorism’, to rob the third world populations of their natural resources just isn’t enough for the pandering intellectual snobs at Foreign Affairs–no, the corporate hunger pangs have turned to violent tremors threatening to throw the neo-liberal beasts into a complete frenzy, indicated by the series of blatant wars of the Muslim nations in the middle east under the false banner of ‘Democracy’ and ‘freedom’.

The false flag terror events orchestrated by black operatives to gain national support for an initial war in the middle east was a dream conceptualized by a small group of technocrats, the situation outlined in the ‘Project for a New American Century’ report, and the an obvious continuation of the infamous ‘Operation Northwoods’ report.

These pieces both outlines strategies for staging domestic violence by menacing civilian populations in an attempt to cast foreign enemies as scapegoats to justify calls for war, the enemies would be selected either as a means to an end, i.e., a pawn in a proxy war to covertly take aim at a larger target, or the enemy selection would be based on the sovereign nation in question’s possession of vast and lucrative natural resources.

In the early 1970’s, a classified document, the National Security Study Memorandum, NSSM 200 report on population was created by National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger to determine possible effects of the growing population on the United States. The report indicated that over population was becoming a serious threat to US national security interests, it reads:

“The U.S. medium projections show a world population of 12 billion by 2075 which implies a five-fold increase in south and Southeast Asia and in Latin American and a seven-fold increase in Africa, compared with a doubling in East Asia and a 40% increase in the presently developed countries.”

One solution was creating an educational atmosphere for the younger generation suggesting the benefits of a two child household; other solutions include:

the possibility of denying aid to third world countries as a deterrent for rapidly growing populations, the solution was to suggest these countries implement birth control education on a large scale, controlling rural areas(possibly with sterilants in medication, food and water as was later proposed by John P Holdren, in his book, Ecoscience, to manage populations), where ”fertility has been found to be higher”, where there is “inadequate information about and availability of means of fertility control” and also, “certain development programs may bring a faster demographic transition to lower fertility rates than other aspects of development. The World Population Plan of Action adopted at the World Population Conference recommends that countries working to affect fertility levels should be given priority to development programs and health and education strategies which have a decisive effect on fertility.” it also proposes to position women in the workplace to discourage larger families.

This report states that developing countries are burdened by their rich content of minerals and natural resources, and it implies that fast growing populations in Africa, Asia, and Latin America will continue to struggle to produce such resources under these dire conditions, which overall is really just a euphemistic way of suggesting these countries are in a prime spot to compete against imperialistic hegemony aggressively pursued by US interests.

“Assistance for population moderation should give primary emphasis to the largest and fastest growing developing countries where there is special U.S. political and strategic interest. Those countries are: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia. Together, they account for 47 percent of the world’s current population increase. (It should be recognized that at present AID bilateral assistance to some of these countries may not be acceptable.)”

The report further insinuates the need to relieve these countries of their natural resources:

“Rapid population growth is not in itself a major factor in pressure on depletable resources (fossil fuels and other minerals), since demand for them depends more on levels of industrial output than on numbers of people. On the other hand, the world is increasingly dependent on mineral supplies from developing countries, and if rapid population frustrates their prospects for economic development and social progress, the resulting instability may undermine the conditions for expanded output and sustained flows of such resources.”

One of the current, and unfortunately less reported examples of radical imperialism is the USAfricom program, a military operation designed to ‘help developing nations fight terrorism’.

Africom, established October 1st 2007, the little known massive militarization of Africa, and the next sequence in the loving tale of United States foreign policy, is an operation that has drastically restructured the US military command structure, to make an entity answerable to the secretary of defense for military operations with 53 African countries, it is a facet of the never-ending ‘war on terrorism’, providing military aid to certain groups, conducting civilian operations with the military, and protecting US oil interests, as the US purchases 24% of its oil from the African continent, and to hedge China’s progress in attempting to take advantage of the fossil fuels as well.

Representative Ed Royce (R-CA) said:

”Africa’s emerging potential as a major oil producer and supplier to the United States, has been of interest to the Sub-Committee on Africa that I’ve chaired for some time. The sub-committee held a hearing to look at this topic in 2000. It’s clearly in our national interest to diversify our energy supply, especially given the turbulent political climate in key parts of the world today. The expansion of energy production in Africa matches to that interest…”

The violent imperialist parade ensued in Afghanistan, then the public was led by the nose into Iraq, based on no real intelligence. The military escapades proceeded later in Egypt and Libya, while the public’s mind fog, a perpetual euphoric daze instigated by the pop culture opium of the masses, a literal zombie-like state created through means of ultra violence contained in movies, and video games with the endless obsession over the deviant drug habits of pop icons, but that is just one dimension of the mind numbing that befell the unsuspecting public.

President Obama said we couldn’t raise the standard of living in the third-world countries because ‘everything would boil over’ but the stated attempt of the pervasive neo colonialist agenda is to supposedly raise the standard of living while creating grossly inflated economic projections on the country’s potential prospects for growth justifying enormous loans for infrastructure, health, utility services, and other civil engineering mechanisms, in the hopes that the IMF and World Bank issued loans will be so gargantuan that the government in question would be ultimately unable to pay them back, causing them to be forced to surrender natural resources as collateral with the pending obligation to still pay the loan with interest in full.

This program of aggressive exploitation, not only avoids congressional scrutiny by virtue of being a covert fascist coup on the republic, with select government officials working in tandem with corporations in a conspiracy against vulnerable leaders to maximize profits, and destroy competition; the whole system flies under the public’s radar as well–most people just simply can’t believe that their elected officials would let such corruption run rampant.

The false debate created by the corporate-controlled media about capitalists verses socialists is losing momentum as people begin to realize that the corporations have a strangle hold over their lives.

This false system was set up to divert the public’s attention from true free market capitalism encouraging liberty verses a corporatocracy determined to established an unquestioned monopoly over all products while treating the world like a gigantic game of Risk.

With the ‘elected’ officials being devote disciples of the money cult of the Federal Reserve, with multinational corporations, don’t underestimate the ability to vote with dollars to put a dent in the system.

“Illusions commend themselves to us because they save us pain and allow us to enjoy pleasure instead. We must therefore accept it without complaint when they sometimes collide with a bit of reality against which they are dashed to pieces.”
Sigmund Freud

Listen:

A perilous situation presents itself, and the disturbing implications need to be examined carefully. The public’s tunnel-vision awareness is in desperate need of rapid expansion—few are exempt from this supposition, and pointing it out does not imply exclusion from the dilemma.

An almost frantic degree of skepticism needs to be applied to everything—for too long an indiscriminate acceptance of pure insanity, packaged as ‘official’ leading to the default mind-set that it must be credible, has been practiced.

The ‘correct’ train of thought can be socially engineered through sanitized ‘talking points’ endlessly pimped out to the public via shameless, career-driven manufactured talking head personalities, that have over time gradually reinforced a strong sense of trust in all the toxic garbage they spew relentlessly.

In order to understand a massacre such as sandy hook, a false flag operation orchestrated by rogue elements of the government, it is necessary to understand the relationship between the corporate-controlled mainstream media and the public.

There exists a need to protect an official narrative that does not disrupt the fragile platform that the press is strategically positioned on.

The public’s hungry minds sit open and waiting to download the correct version of events presented to them through the various news media programs. The people are helplessly compelled to accept unconditionally the fabricated reality, their peace of mind and survival in social atmospheres depends on it.

There has been instilled in them a deep-seated fear of reprisal for cynicism or skepticism of anything that comes from the ‘trustworthy’ sources like CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News; a chilling fear paralyzes them lest they go astray from the flock—it is so dominate in their minds that the thought will almost certainly never arise in most minds to even initiate the first step of questioning what is offered to them from the all powerful corporate-controlled ‘news’, which is nothing more than an on-going exercise in theatrics.

In the wake of the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary, dissenting voices like Professor James F. Tracy, a communications professor were demonized by corporate-controlled mainstream media. After the tragic events he made an effort voice his concerns through his blog:

Professor Tracy’s sanity was called into question because he compiled a healthy list of bizarre anomalies associated with the event. No one can say for certain what happened on that day, but it is clear that the version presented to the public is an obvious lie. There are many theories on what really happened, and the implications that begin to manifest are alarming.

Staged terror attacks are not outside the realm of possibility, and should be considered if the investigation is truly objective. If it were as simple as creating a sensational account, as far as the bread and butter conspiracy theorist crowd were concerned, they definitely could muster up more creativity for an alternate story—the inside scoop—what really happened, and maybe some fringe elements of the web have constructed bizarre accounts that will ultimately fade away for lack of facts and merit.

Legitimate attempts at true investigative journalism have been harshly criticized for merely proposing alternate theories that are really not so far-fetched.

National safety expert Wolfgang Halbig, who is investigating sandy hook, has compiled a list of anomalies, he is directing 16 questions to the Connecticut officials in charge through his website:

in regards to the response to the shooting at Sandy Hook. Mr. Halbig has been intimidated by police, threatening him with criminal charges, they’ve denied his FOIA requests, and he’s been blatantly stonewalled at every turn of his investigation. He was told flat out that the whole incident was ‘classified’ for national security.

The naivety and ignorance of the public is, quite frankly grotesque. The ostensible foundation of the establishment media will begin to crumble very quickly when the furtive agenda they fought tooth and nail to conceal is brought to light. It should not be too presumptuous to initiate a serious inquiry when there are so many tell-tale signs of a cover up.

The people have been bullied into believing a lie, and one of the reasons for the success is the utilization of guilt to halt any serious debate about the issue.

An initiative proposed by the technocratic think tank, the Atlantic Council called ‘Saving Cyberspace’ is a propaganda piece designed to instill fear in the public using the state as a justification to move in, take over, and secure its role as protector of the(long since antiquated idea)private citizen.

There is an obvious need to initiate a process to instill in the public’s mind a sense of fear that some ambiguous enemy is lurking behind every corner to destroy lives.

There has to be a scapegoat for the social ills, a bogeyman; currently the US technocrat-hijacked government is demonizing the constitutional enthusiasts:

“Pernicious patriots” or “Insidious individualists”

One of the most famous of the government’s voyeuristic criminal agencies, the NSA, who has been guilty repeatedly of taking over social media websites, infecting people’s personal computers with malicious software, installing covert ‘back door’ technology into various computers and smart devices to eavesdrop on an unsuspecting public via the device’s webcam or mic, and the massive theft of people’s personal information to catalogue citizens into various data bases, e.g. the regional ‘fusion centers’ which assess ‘risks’ that certain people may pose to national security, and the fire sale tactics of auctioning off meta data to select corporations to grant a competitive edge for insiders at the expense of one’s privacy.

The internet is the last bastion of a free and open society that is being pillaged by trans-national interests in an attempt to eradicate this republic’s sovereignty, and to further throw the citizens of the world into a neo feudal slavery through the collapse of their respective country’s economy, e.g., Europe and South American countries like: Greece, Spain, Venezuela, and more recently the Ukraine.

The internet is a fertile breeding ground for the rising independent media that is filling the information vacuum left by the diseased, crippled, and dying corporate-controlled media monster which will now be finding ways to pull everything down to hell with it, and this includes destroying the means for humanity to retain individual liberties.

The Atlantic Council labels themselves: ‘the most forward-leaning think tank’ when it comes to cyber security matters in Washington, D.C., and perhaps the world. It is very hard to argue with the prospect of being so ‘forward-leaning’ which is to imply that if one points out an inherent flaw in their logic that nay-sayer is crippled with a rigid and backward ideology.

It is a proposition that theirs is the most ‘progressive’ and innovative philosophy on this topic, apparently they are the ones who are able to create such a false consensus in regards to their view in this matter.

The piece mentions that their stance is known for its strong stance against NSA spying, and ‘other cyber attacks’, like stuxnet. This is a very crude understatement of the issue of a government intelligence agency inverting its focus from foreign enemies inward toward its own domestic population, a practice that the Obama regime claims would be applauded by the patriots like Paul Revere who warned the citizens of the incoming attack by the British.

The brief mention of the criminal NSA is an obvious attempt to placate the skeptics who are in full support of state nullification of the NSA spying, in many states like Utah there are bills to cease funding of the data centers which use an enormous amount of water to keep the facilities operating.

Their attempt to present a false concern for mass government corruption distracts from the larger problem of the NSA spreading viruses on internet users to manipulate computers, hijacking social media websites to steal data, and the rampant cataloging of personal information just to name a few areas where this agency has grossly abused its power.

The article then begins to prime the reader’s mind with the foundational pieces of a false flag event, referencing the terrorist attacks of September 11th, making a comparison to a possible future similar ‘cyber 9/11’, or ‘digital pearl harbor’.

The ulterior motives for this casual mention of a massive cyber attack perpetrated by some vague terrorist threat would almost undoubtedly be used for a justification for increased security measures which would most certainly hurt the individual’s rights, and destroy the freedom of the web.

They mention that their system for assessing the cyber security risk with all its potential vulnerabilities, and complexity is similar to how financial institutions evaluated risks prior to the 2008 financial collapse. They neglect the FBI investigation in 2004 that warned of an epidemic of potential mortgage fraud instigated by the lenders, and not the borrowers, and the fact that major financial institutions have been caught manipulating interest rates to generate massive profits for themselves and colleagues.

The strong possibility that top executives engineered the very crisis that led to their inevitable downfall is echoed by the fact that there is evidence that with both 9/11 and the pearl harbor attacks there was prior knowledge of the tragic events by government officials before they happened. The government is left unaccountable, and the people suffer, sacrificing civil liberties for the illusion of security.

A catastrophic event could be implemented by black operative rogue elements of the government, in all of these cases there are usually intelligent agents who pick up on something before it happens, but all attempts to disrupt the looming disaster are halted because it would impede the underlying lucrative agenda waiting to unfold while the public is at its emotionally sensitive maximum after the cataclysm.

The article proceeds to blatantly advertise a corporatist agenda with so-called: ‘global governance strategies’ to initiate the whole process which most likely include contracts administered to select components of the private sector who stand to profit handsomely from a government engineered false flag attack.

Strong criticism must put exercised among a think tank like the Atlantic Council that actually called for false-flag attacks to justify strengthening state power.

On the Atlantic Council website, Harlan Ullman emphasizes the main goal to eliminate threats to the power structure: ‘eliminating the empowered individual’.

In the article, Ullman continues to lump whistleblowers like Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning with terrorists, and he goes on to suggest the further overt implementation of the Hegelian dialectic, problem, reaction, solution model of creating a crisis and offering a solution to the public in the midst of wide spread panic.

“Without an extraordinary crisis, little is likely to be done to reverse or limit the damage imposed by failed or failing governance.”

Ullman continues by insisting civil liberties and sovereignty are the menace:

“In essence, the 365 year-old Westphalian system that placed sovereign states as the centerpieces of international politics is being tested and in some cases made obsolete by the empowerment of individuals and non-state actors.”

The 1648 Treaty of Westphalia acting as a protection of civil liberties against foreign interests and the oppression of central banks imposed on the public to suck up all the wealth via the euphemistic practices of ‘free trade’ which are imperialist instruments used by oligarchs and neo-colonialists, conversely the ‘fair trade’ system is a safeguard against exploitation and protects the sovereign nation state, protecting a nation’s domestic interests from trans nationalist enemies meddling in and imposing corrupt policies against their will.

In an article by Paul Joseph Watson of Prison Planet he describes a report leaked by someone associated with Oathkeepers. The document is from the department of homeland security, it illustrates a scenario to organize a drill where the authorities would have to stifle an online attack by a patriot hacktivist group: “Free Americans Against Socialist Tyranny”.

The report emphasizes that certain government agents might be sympathetic to the anti government’s cause, consequently certain defenses would be compromised, justifying an internet kill switch to stifle political dissent.

These possible draconian measures put in place as a way to ‘balance liberty and security’ will target vigilante groups such as the ‘hacktivists’ Anonymous, who ironically seem to protect the public’s interest more than the government, who in this day and age are ruled by corporate interests.

The internet is the last refuge of individual liberty in this world, besides one’s own mind, and both are constantly under attack, but not by some vague terror threat coming in the form of a man with dark skin, with a long beard and a turban, bent on jihad against ‘the infidel’, or a well-built, disgruntled, gun-owning army veteran who loves private property and liberty–no, the threat will materialize in a discussion taking place in a corporate boardroom, inspired by a government contract to eliminate the slaves’ ability to have free speech, to organize protests against oppression, and to innovate on a scale never before imagined–the complete empowerment of the individual;

the threat will come from the technocrat’s manipulation of the hearts and minds of the people, the continued effort to convince them it is their best interest to trade liberty for freedom in order to access the right to security.

The implications of such a pervasive false narrative, like the recent subject of Ukraine’s instability and the supposed question of Crimea’s independence exhorted by the corporate-controlled mass media, are heavy.

This situation can be used to effectively illustrate how the media is a state-run instrument of the technocratic elite whose main goal is the elimination of national sovereignty, not only here, but abroad as well. It is no longer accurate to merely state that the US foreign policies are corrupt, because not only does the issue run much deeper, but more specifically it is the corporate trans-nationalists’ interests at play in this episode playing out in Ukraine, and other situations like it—this is the most current example.

In a recent Foreign Affairs article by Alexander J Motyl entitled: “Is Putin Rational?” Motyl paints Putin as a raving lunatic bent on an extreme eastern version of the west’s manifest destiny, a ravenous opportunist who craves to use this moment of instability for his own nefarious ends.

“Russia’s state-controlled channels whip up anti-Ukrainian hysteria as Putin and the Kremlin insist that the government in Kiev illegitimate. No one can fully know Putin’s intentions. One’s best guess depends on one’s assumptions of his rationality. If he is irrational — unable to correctly judge the costs and benefits of invading Ukraine because he is in thrall to some ideology or the pursuit of power — then it is safe to assume that he will continue on his current course. Lilia Shevtsova, a liberal Russian analyst, and Andrei Illarionov, Putin’s former economic advisor, make that case. “He believes that he is chosen by divine providence to punish liberated Ukrainians,” Illarianov writes, “He believes that now there is a unique historical situation: Ukraine is in [a] state of severe crises, its authorities and institutions do not function effectively. He dreams that providence demands him to fulfill this mission.” If Illarionov and Shevtsova are right, nothing can stop Putin from launching a massive land war against Ukraine, regardless of how much it would cost in human life, property, and prestige. Such a Putin could conceivably keep marching up to the Atlantic, , a Russian political scientist and Putin’s ideological mentor, believes Russia must. “If we win,” he recently wrote, “we will begin the expansion of liberational (from Americans) ideology into Europe. It is the goal of full Eurasianism — Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok. Great Eurasian Continental Empire.”

These commentators neglect to mention that the aggression was initiated by the west, and the fact that a coup has been orchestrated by the technocrats, and that the new government, the Svoboda party is a group of Neo Nazis.

The real question is: is John Kerry rational? What about Barrack Obama? Are these people sane?

These are not questions in jest, there needs to be a serious look into the mental health of the supposed United States’ leaders first. The President and Secretary of State really seem hell bent on starting a war. It doesn’t help the situation to have Neo Con lunatics like John McCain and Lindsey graham to provoke them.

This is just another case of a democratically elected government watching out for its own people’s interests which happen to conflict with technocratic elites who would love to issue a humungous loan to the country under the guise of economic aid, the repayment of the loan subject to strict austerity measure that are imposed on the people, and the country’s assets are simultaneously stolen as collateral and a down payment for the loan. This corporate, trans-nationalist loan shark policy, an attempt to maintain control over various governments, follows a long tradition of throwing out democratically elected governments, e.g., Iran, Chile, Venezuela, Panama, Guatemala, just to name a few, installing dictators, and reaping the financial benefits of profits from renewed infrastructure, and the utilization of specific country’s various assets.

It all started when Ukraine parliament rejected the EU deal, and all hell broke loose.

The Ukraine president, Yanukovich stated:

“[Softening the economic blow] requires our joint work on a program of economic aid to Ukraine, which will allow us to implement the preparation for the signing of the agreement. We believe such a program should be the result of a joint effort by Ukraine and the EU,” Protestors hit streets.

Nulland claimed a Ukrainian government wouldn’t be stable unless they support the EU, she mentioned that she had been working with prominent businessmen and lobbyists who had an interest in changing the geopolitical environment, and she admitted to spending five billion on Ukraine’s needs, and ‘other goals’.

During the riots there were sightings of military clad operatives being unloaded from buses, this scene was reminiscent of the Bolsheviks in Czarist 1917 Russia, Wall Street financed rebels with a mission to overthrow the government, staging ‘a people’s uprising, communist revolution’, these right-wing nationalists , coming en masse to provoke violence.

The Ukrainian president, Yanukovych observed:

“The towns are patrolled by masked men with armbands. They fire top army officers – those who show resistance and do not want to use armed forces in the south-east of the country against the civilian population. Just think about it – they want to put the army under the banner of Bandera and launch a civil war,”

Yanukovych further lamented the destruction of his country:

“dark forces in Kiev want to have armed forces of militant nationalist organizations involved, they want to give them weapons.”

There was a leaked call where Victoria Nulland Assistant Secretary of State, was heard planning a meeting with ‘Yats’ to offer government position because of his ’economic experience’.

Pyatt: Yeah. I guess… in terms of him not going into the government, just let him stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I’m just thinking in terms of sort of the process moving ahead we want to keep the moderate democrats together. The problem is going to be Tyahnybok [Oleh Tyahnybok, the other opposition leader] and his guys and I’m sure that’s part of what [President Viktor] Yanukovych is calculating on all this.

Nuland: [Breaks in] I think Yats is the guy who’s got the economic experience, the governing experience. He’s the… what he needs is Klitsch and Tyahnybok on the outside. He needs to be talking to them four times a week, you know. I just think Klitsch going in… he’s going to be at that level working for Yatseniuk, it’s just not going to work.

Pyatt: Yeah, no, I think that’s right. OK. Good. Do you want us to set up a call with him as the next step?

Nuland: My understanding from that call – but you tell me – was that the big three were going into their own meeting and that Yats was going to offer in that context a… three-plus-one conversation or three-plus-two with you. Is that not how you understood it?

Pyatt: No. I think… I mean that’s what he proposed but I think, just knowing the dynamic that’s been with them where Klitschko has been the top dog, he’s going to take a while to show up for whatever meeting they’ve got and he’s probably talking to his guys at this point, so I think you reaching out directly to him helps with the personality management among the three and it gives you also a chance to move fast on all this stuff and put us behind it before they all sit down and he explains why he doesn’t like it.

Nuland: OK, good. I’m happy. Why don’t you reach out to him and see if he wants to talk before or after.

Pyatt: OK, will do. Thanks.

After the western media relentlessly drove the people into hysterics over a supposed ‘invasion in Crimea’ the Russians announced they were holding military exercises in Crimea to secure military assets, in the wake of the recent western coup.

Despite the citizens of Crimea area pledging allegiances to Russia, a vote of 97% to join Russia, the US threatened sanctions against Russia unless they leave. The US, or more accurately stated, predatory corporate interests claimed repeatedly with a nauseating general sense of lunatic obstinance that Russia was violating Ukraine’s sovereignty.

Putin, at of expense of being labeled ‘irrational’, and even compared to Hitler by Hilary Clinton, says that the new Ukraine government is illegitimate, that it was hijacked by ‘Ultra-Nationalists’.

The US proceeded to impose sanctions against Russia, it also created a law reserving the right to seize assets of anyone who ‘disrupts Ukraine’s sovereignty’.

This is another manifestation of the technocratic control-freak agenda playing out yet again.

Installing a Neo-Nazi government in an unstable region is arsenic icing for a cake that already exists through the looking glass, which happens to be laced with some supernatural hybrid of PCP and LSD, and this summation is an understatement.

Putin was able to produce an effective diplomatic solution last year with the looming threat of a virtual nuclear proxy war situation in Syria.

But who in this situation will save the people at the perpetual mercy of raving lunatics at the helm?

“The media’s the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.”
Malcolm X

The technocratic mind manipulators have engineered a constant system of control and exploitation. The American education system ensures that young minds are impressed with the illusory concept of perpetual progress.

Through the illusory enterprise of ‘progress’ millions have been slaughtered, and usually after a psy-op, or false-flag operation was orchestrated to manipulate the public using terrorism to justify the sacrifice of liberties, and to go abroad, launching illegal wars for a country’s natural resources; these assertions are backed-up by the CIA’s declassified ‘Operation Mockingbird’, a plan to infiltrate the news media as a means to influence public opinion, and the 1960’s declassified ‘Northwoods Documents’, which proposed using terrorism to affect public opinion, and to create political bogeymen to justify a radically different foreign or domestic policy.

COINTELPRO, an FBI program, started in 1956, designed to surveil and infiltrate, and discredit political activist groups, like the communist party, The Black Panthers, African Nationalists, or others deemed a threat to national security. The FBI used psychological warfare, false reports to media, harassment, wrongful imprisonment, and extralegal violence and assassinations.

In March 17, 1978, Zbigniew Brezinski, technocrat and former National Security Advisor under President Carter created the National Security Council Memorandum-46, subject: Black Africa and the US. The aim of the study was to determine possible effects of African leaders on black leftist groups in the states. The content can be summarized as: how to approach the issue if there exists possible tensions between Africa and the US, there could be a potential loss of access to precious natural resources from the African continent, this could ultimately lead to hostilities, and cause the black leftist groups to gain strength– US interests were worth billions.

In order to stabilize potential tensions, and neutralize Black Nationalist movements, without appearing negatively certain ‘counter measures’ would be put into effect. A possible out-of-control situation where protests, demonstrations, and boycotts on corporations and banks with suggestions of ‘black lobby’ in congress, the possible remembering Dr. Martin Luther King, exhorting extremist ideals like an ”African Republic”, these things could affect US foreign policy toward the continent.

The recommendations of this report include: taking control of the African movement inside the United States, instigate CIA clandestine activities to create division in the various black leftist groups, increased FBI surveillance operations against black African nationalists who may have opposing views to US interests in Africa.

Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, a technocratic operation to control populations whose official goal was to promote ‘racial cleansing’ and eliminate the black population, they were, according to her a scourge that needed to be eliminated. Margaret Sanger was a guest speaker at several klu klux klan meetings, and stated many times the desire to control the liberal movement, put a charismatic black leader in charge to encourage the ultimate destruction of the black race. Margaret Sanger wrote a letter in December 19, 1939 to Dr. Clarence Gamble of Proctor and Gamble, in regards to their ‘Negro Project’:

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

“Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need … We must prevent Multiplication of this bad stock.”

— Margaret Sanger, April 1933 Birth Control Review.

The US was one of the pioneers of the technocratic pseudo science of eugenics. The pseudo science of eugenics originated in the 1880’s, developed by Sir Francis Galton; the idea was to control the progress of humanity through selective breeding, pairing partners based on aesthetics, intelligence, race, and social status; consequently those deemed as ‘undesirables’ were eliminated.

The United States pursued its eugenics policy very aggressively by 1928 with the promotion of ‘racial cleanliness’, the suggestion of ‘extermination’, the practice of forced sterilization, enforced legislation of anti-miscegenation, immigration laws preventing the mix of Anglo-Saxons with the ‘lesser’ eastern Europeans and other ‘inferior’ races, and euthanasia for ‘feeble minded’ or ‘immoral’ people. Prominent eugenicists’ end goals were massive euthanasia programs, but they were apprehensive to implement public gas chambers because of lack of confidence in public approval; In Lincoln, Illinois a particular mental institution would infect milk with tuberculosis, as a euthanasia method, citing the theoretical precept that ‘superior’ stock would be able to resist the sickness; this practice caused an annual death rate of 30-40%.

32 states pursued sterilization policies, the first of which was Michigan in 1897. California had the highest sterilizations, 20,000 from 1909 to the 1960’s; and North Carolina had the most aggressive attitude concerning who was ‘unfit’ to bear children. In 1942, the Supreme Court ruled that white-collar criminals would not be exempt from sterilizations. Between 1907 thru 1963 over 64,000 people were forcibly sterilized, 61 percent of those were women.

Feminist organizations like the Woman’s Temperance Union, National League of Women Voters, and Planned Parenthood, also various corporate interests like the Carnegie Institute, Rockefeller

Foundation, and Harriman railroad fortune were at the forefront of the campaign to encourage public opinion in favor of ‘racial hygiene’ and social engineering via selective breeding.

The United States’ eugenics policy was Hitler’s inspiration for the German Nazi pursuit of ‘racial hygiene’ or ‘Nordic superiority’ in the 1930’s to 1940’s. The Rockefeller Foundation, for one was a huge contributor of the Nazi Germany eugenics program. C.M. Goethe, California eugenicist leader mentioned to a colleague, in regards to Germany’s ravenous appetite for eugenics:

“You will be interested to know that your work has played a powerful part in shaping the opinions of the group of intellectuals who are behind Hitler in this epoch-making program. Everywhere I sensed that their opinions have been tremendously stimulated by American thought . . . I want you, my dear friend, to carry this thought with you for the rest of your life, that you have really jolted into action a great government of 60 million people.”

The state of California was recently caught forcibly sterilizing women prison inmates. Doctors under lucrative state contracts sterilized 150 female prisons from 2006 to 2010, possibly one hundred more dating back to 1990. One prison administrator questioned about the state contract rationalized by saying the worth of the state contract to doctors was nothing compared to potential state welfare costs that would be accrued when these women had more children.

One gruesome fact that was not mentioned in social studies, health or science class was that AIDS was a military manufactured bio-weapon. It is truly unbelievable that a government would intentionally kill its own people, and target groups in other countries for their valuable natural resources, however this seems to be a constant theme throughout humanity’s existence on this planet. As hard as it is to believe, all the evidence supports the assertion that the US government was complicit in the deaths of millions of people for profit.

General Smedley Butler, a decorated war hero famously said that ‘war is a racket’ because all wars throughout history can be found to have vast profit motives. Take a brief example of WWII, the Bush family with Chase bank funded the Nazis before, during, and after the war, in this case supporting both sides was extremely lucrative when generating profits from military contracts, the Ford Company supplying trucks, or US corporate interests reaping benefits from funding the IG Farben chemical company that produced the gas chambers in Germany.

Dr. Boyd E. Graves, civil rights leader and an HIV/AIDS activist dedicated to exposing the true cause of the deadly virus has commenting in reference to the evidence he pieced together elucidating the chain of evidence associated with the bio weapon:

“The 1971 flowchart makes it perfectly clear, the design, intent and purpose of the U.S. Special Virus program. As Dr. Peter Piot, Executive Director of UNAIDS says, ‘The HIV/AIDS virus is the result of many steps in the laboratory, it was no accident.’ The 1971 flowchart provides absolute evidence of the United States’ intent to kill its own citizens and others… We are greater than any federal virus program. We are the human race!”

The ‘flow chart’ referenced above is the evidence presented by Dr. Graves in 1999 in Granonoque, Canada; it is outline for the research conducted in the ‘ultra secret federal program entitled ‘the special virus’.

In July 1969, Dr. Macarthur, Director of the Army Advanced Research Project Agency appeared before the Appropriations Committee of the House, he is quoted as saying:

“There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired. All biological agents up the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon when we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.”

The technocrats, through their infiltration of various ‘liberal’ groups are conducting an inconspicuous black genocide operation.

“The most dangerous place for an African-American is in the womb.” — Pastor Clendard Childress, of Blackgenocide.org, a man who has made it a personal crusade to create awareness of the disturbing disparity between white and black abortion rates.

There seems to be a link between the founder of Planned Parenthood’s stated goal of ‘eliminating the negro race’ and the rapid rate of black abortions, compared to other races. Since 1973 31% of all US abortions have been conducted on blacks; there were 55.7 million abortions since 1973, and 17 million were black, and according to the US Census Bureau, the black population has grown at a slower pace than other races. From 1973 to 2012 abortions reduced the black population by 30%.

In 2010 the total US population was 308,745,538 blacks made up 12.6% of the US population, while whites make up 72.4% of the population; There were 765,651 abortions, the abortion rate was 14.6 per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44, and the abortion ratio was 288 per 1,000 live births in the United States, according to CDC statistics. Black abortions accounted for 35.7% of all abortions, with the highest abortion rates of all races of 31.8 per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44, and the abortion ratio increased 3% from 486 abortions per 1,000 live births in 2007 to 503 in 2010.

It is disturbing to realize the fact that powerful government agencies have undermined true progress in this country and around the world by co-opting civil rights movements, sabotaging mankind’s trajectory toward liberty, the prospect for dealing with legitimate social innovations, and overcoming the real challenges that affect us all as living beings on this planet.

Knowledge is power, and we can reject their system of technocracy, their decadent, and seductive false-reality matrix–we have the power to opt out. We can continue to question authority, do our own research, and warn others. Everyone has power, and despite the pessimistic messages expressed by the corporate-controlled media, there are good people out there and we can all do our part.

“Madness is rare in individuals – but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule.”

–Friedrich Nietzsche

The state needs an intervention. It has a host of issues, to put it mildly. Perhaps even the people are a little guilty for enabling it by virtue of their continued tolerance of the insanity.

The people need to address the issue of corrupt governments, the technocratic elite, and the nefarious abstract entity known as ‘the state’ with complete honesty. People are demonized, endless ‘progressive’ propaganda conditions the public to accept the idea that they are parasites on this planet, and that they would be nothing without the godlike state. But what if the state were a person? What are the implications of scrutinizing the state in this regard, the same way people are subject to inspection, who go to a psychologist? If anything, the state should have higher standards applied to it since it claims to be the master of everything.

The state is held to an entirely different standard than the individual. When the public is illegally spied on by the voyeuristic NSA, it is for ‘national security’, to protect against the looming ‘terror threat’; when congress is spied on, Dianne Feinstein claims it is unconstitutional, and when world leaders are spied on, it is a violation of their privacy and they create their own internet.

If the state were a person how would it be classified according to its own standards?

The state is engaged in every criminal act possible, (and then some) either the state, as a person is a complete degenerate hedonist or a glorified sin eater of society.

It may be impossible to determine the exact events that transpired during this hypothetical childhood of the state, but one can make a series of educated guesses based on its typical behavior.

If it is permissible to speculate on the conditions of the state’s childhood it would be fair to assume it was an abandoned orphan, raised without nurturing love and compassion. As a result of such neglect, the capacity to feel emotions and the ability to care for others was diminished. The state was probably the kid who got off on frying bugs under a magnifying glass with the concentrated beams from the sun.

The state is a cold, hardened criminal exhibiting sociopathic tendencies; it uses others as a means to its own ends. It completely promotes a disregard for human dignity and liberal values. Freedom is utterly despised, and slavery enthroned with an obscene degree of illumination, promoted relentlessly on every mainstream media platform.

The state is infested with megalomania, ruthlessly jealous of others possessing any unique talents, self-sufficiency and independent abilities; it is blatantly conceded, a psychopathic control freak with Munchhausen syndrome, as it likes to keep everyone sick with geo-engineering, vaccines and GMO.

The state projects itself as an idol to be admired, instilling a strong sense of obedience in everyone from an early age. It stifles dissent, discourages research, and prohibits skeptical inquiry. It displays narcissicist personality disorder, manifested through the cult of personality phenomenon utilized by various dictatorships from Hitler, Stalin, Mao and more recently to Bush or Obama.

It has an unrealistic expectation of unconditional love and attention, with a complete lack of empathy, an insatiable thirst for power, a bizarre obsession with unbridled supremacy, threatening anyone daring to question its authority, with unjustified greatness and inflated sense of glory defined in its many hyped-up ceremonies.

The state is engaged in so many rotten activities that in the interest of time only a few can be covered:

Sadism as it derives pleasure from torture.

Voyeuristic ‘peeping tom’ behavior.

Kleptomania, as it steals constantly from citizens via taxes and robbing third world countries of their wealth through the neo liberal practice of ‘privatization’ to maintain its power monopoly.

And not to mention, it is illegitimate because it seizes power without consent, and enforces policies at the point of a gun.

Here are a few brief examples of the state’s countless acts of violence: homicide, politicide, genocide, and infanticide; the general classification for all the state’s brutal murder is democide.

‘Democide’ is defined by political scientists as: “the murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide and mass murder.” In the last century alone governments world-wide have killed over 200 million people.

For forty years from 1932 to 1972, the US Public Health Service held secret experiments famously known as the Tuskegee Experiments, offering black people treatment for syphilis, yet purposefully keeping them sick to observe their physical condition in the third stage of the disease; almost 400 men were deprived of legitimate medical treatment for the disease.

One doctor stated: “If the colored population becomes aware that accepting free hospital care means a post-mortem, every darky will leave Macon County…”

“The United States government did something that was wrong—deeply, profoundly, morally wrong. It was an outrage to our commitment to integrity and equality for all our citizens… clearly racist.” –President Bill Clinton

From 1946 to 1948 the US government injected Guatemalan Soldiers, inmates, and mental patients with syphilis to test the effectiveness of penicillin.

According to Senate investigations in the 1960’s the Special Operations Division of the Fort Dietrich base in Maryland conducted bio-terror experiments on unsuspecting populations in American cities, Washington D.C., Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, and Los Angeles. Operatives used specially designed suitcases to spray the bucillus subtilis virus into the crowd which causes respiratory infections, blood and food poisoning. Later more tests were conducted with strains of small pox because of its ability to infect people so easily, and spread so quickly. The Senate investigators were quoted as stating:

“CIA association with Fort Dietrich involved the Special Operations Division (SOD) of that facility. This division was responsible for developing special applications for biological warfare agents and toxins. Its principal customer was the U.S. Army. Its concern was with the development of both suitable agents and delivery mechanisms for use in paramilitary situations. Both standard biological warfare agents and biologically derived toxins were investigated by the division.”

In 1985, the Soviet Union came out with a report which claimed the AIDS virus was developed at Fort Dietrich, Maryland by the Pentagon, and the report was backed by an East German report written by Professor Jacob Segal of Humbolt University in East Germany. These assertions were disregarded at the time by the west as propaganda, because after all the United States would never be involved in anything so nefarious, and the conventional mainstream thought continued to succumb to the illusion of the US as a benevolent force in the world.

Larry Grathwohl, an undercover agent who infiltrated the terrorist group ‘The Weather Underground’ in 1969 reported that Bill Ayers, one of Barak Obama’s political mentors, had planned to create ‘re-education camps’ and those who refused to embrace communism would have to be ‘eliminated’. Grathwohl was privy to logistics meetings where plans were made to kill 25 million people who would not convert to collectivism.

Of all the many things the state is guilty of it is a master manipulator. It controls the mainstream media’s narrative, and the history books, which generate a false reality. The state creates the perception that the people live in a democratic government where people can vote for their elected officials and the majority rules. The United States government is supposed to operate like a Constitutional Republic, but there has been a coup by transnational corporate interests, the ‘corporatocracy’. This phenomenon of global governance has been well-documented by scholars and politicians throughout history.

We have to understand how crucial it is that the real nature of governments is widely disseminated, because the rising phenomenon of ‘globalization’ is being sold as a factor of ‘economic progress’ or ‘global community’ which will be a symbol of peace. This global governance paradigm influences the massive corruption because it encourages the state to operate above the law.

John P. Holdren, the US Science Czar suggests creating a world government to manage environmental and eugenics policies in his book ‘Ecoscience’:

“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.

The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

He also suggests martial law may be necessary:

“If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”

The phenomenon of trans-nationalist elites who influence governments has already been well documented by the professor and historian Carroll Quigley. Here is a brief passage from his famous historical treatise:

“…[T]he powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole this system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations . . .”

There will be no election or debate about this slow and subtle process. Academics have been consistently spoken out about a secret elite’s nefarious plot to control the population. In the past prominent scholars, and politicians like Carroll Quigley, John F Kennedy, Barry Goldwater, Dwight D Eisenhower, and contemporaneously Ron Paul have warned of clandestine operations by the military-industrial complex to destroy the liberties of citizens and undermine the sovereign nation state. The Bill of Rights and Constitution will be sold as ‘out-of-date’ and oppressive, it will be claimed they are in serious need of reform.

Felix Frankfurter, Justice of the Supreme Court (1939-1962), said:

“The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes.”

In a famous letter to a colleague dated November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote:

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”

In history there are numerous allusions to ‘the shadow government’, in one case on February 23, 1954 Senator William Jenner referenced this phenomenon:

“Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded.”

There were many efforts to install a central bank in the United States, the most recent success being the Federal Reserve, but between 1816 and 1836 one of the attempts to create a central bank caused Andrew Jackson to write:

“The bold effort the present bank had made to control the government, the distress it had wantonly produced…are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it.”

The state as a person would be a complete monster, a depraved lunatic. When acts of mayhem are conducted on a large scale, for some reason they get excused quicker; war, perpetrated by governments are jus the rich man’s terrorism. As Stalin said: “the death of one is a tragedy, but the death of a million is a statistic”, and Hitler said: “the bigger the lie the easier it is to believe”—this is how the state operates, it hides behind statistics, and massive lies.

Do you want the good news or the bad news first?

Let’s try the bad news: the state, if it were a person would be one cold-blooded psychopathic killer, a true demon to say the least. This may sound melodramatic, it may sound sensational—it’s not, if you’re not mad, then you’re not paying attention—study history.

The good news is that, because of the internet, there is a gigantic shift in consciousness that is causing enlightenment to explode. When Jim Garrison began his life-long crusade to expose the Kennedy assassination, no one had seen the famous Zapruder film, hence the public had no real frame of reference except for the official government version of the events that transpired that fateful day. This day and age, however news is almost instantaneously spread world-wide. People are starting to decipher potentially incriminating patterns that the establishment displays as they follow the same old cliché playbook with psychological operations, and false flag attacks. Images can be captured and dispersed, picked up by various people, elucidating everything for the public with less of a government filter than days of old.
The internet has transferred a vast amount of power to the people. There are powerful elites who want to control this valuable international asset, there are already moves to grant control of the internet to the technocratic elite. The only thing that will guarantee their success in the public’s apathy. The internet, with its unlimited potential to empower humanity is worth fighting for, but the merciless, brutal swine that is the state must be kept in check first.