Browne and Sands versus Sir R. Dashwood.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of John
Browne and Thomas Sands, from a Dismission made in
Chancery the Three and Twentieth Day of February,
in a Cause there depending, wherein the said John
Brown and Thomas Sands were Plaintiffs, against Sir
Robert Dashwood, John Perry Esquire, Sir Samuel
Dashwood, Edward Noell, Executors of George Dashwood Esquire deceased, Edward Buckley, and others,
Defendants; and praying, "that the said Dismission
may be reversed:"

It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said Sir Robert
Dashwood and John Perry may have a Copy of the said
Petition and Appeal; and put in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on Friday the
Fourth Day of December next, at Ten of the Clock in
the Forenoon: And that the said Sir Sam'l Dashwood,
Edward Noel, Edward Buckley, and other Defendants
in the said Cause, may have a Copy of the said Appeal; and be, and they are hereby, required to put
in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in
Writing, on the said Fourth Day of December next.

Sir J. Hanham a Protection to attend his Bill.

Whereas there is a Bill depending in this House,
intituled, "An Act for vesting the Manor of Holme,
alias East Holme, and other Lands of Sir John Hanham Baronet, in the County of Dorset, in Trustees,
to be sold, for discharging a Mortgage thereupon;"
and the said Sir John Hanham not being able to attend
this House, in order to declare his Consent to the said
Bill in Person, fearing to be arrested by his Creditors:

It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said Sir John
Hanham shall and he hath hereby the Protection of
this House, from any Arrest or Attachment whatsoever,
in his coming, staying here, and returning again, during the Dependance of the said Bill in this House;
and this shall be a sufficient Warrant on that Behalf.

To all Mayors, Sheriffs, Under-sheriffs,
Bailiffs, and other Officers whatsoever
whom this may concern.

Wethered versus Roberts, in Error.

The Lord Chief Justice of the King's Bench, in the
usual Manner, brought in a Writ of Error; (videlicet,)

Thomas Wethered Plaintiff,

versus

Francisc. Roberts Defendant.

Messages from H. C. with Bills.

A Message from the House of Commons, by Colonel Wharton and others:

Who brought up a Bill, intituled, "An Act for
the further remedying the ill State of the Coin of
the Kingdom;" to which they desire the Concurrence
of this House.

A Message from the House of Commons, by Mr.
Clarke and others:

Who brought up a Bill, intituled, "An Act to explain that Part of the Act passed the last Session of
Parliament, for laying several Duties on Low Wines
and Spirits of the First Extraction, and for preventing the Frauds and Abuses of Brewers, Distillers,
and other Persons chargeable with the Duties of
Excise, which relates to the Payment of Tallies and
the Interest thereof;" to which they desire the Concurrence of this House.

No Lord to go into the House of Commons whilst sitting.

It was proposed, to be ordered, "That no Lord of
this House go into the House of Commons, when
sitting, without Leave of this House."

And, after Debate thereupon,

This Question was put, "Whether the House
shall be now adjourned?"

It was Resolved in the Negative.

ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in
Parliament assembled, That no Lord of this House
shall go into the House of Commons, whilst the House,
or any Committee of the whole House, is sitting there,
without the Leave of this House first had; and this
to be added to the Roll of Standing Orders.

Mr. Cook to attend.

ORDERED, That Mr. Cook, One of the Prothonotaries of the Court of Common Pleas, do attend this
House.