CATEGORIES

Supreme Court Will Not Review Controversial Ban on Gay Therapy

Washington, DC–The U.S. Supreme Court announced this morning that it will not review a California case challenging a ban on therapy for unwanted same-sex attraction and gender confusion in minors. Pacific Justice Institute had been battling the law, known as Senate Bill 1172, for the past 5 years, beginning in the Legislature. PJI initially won an injunction that kept the law from taking effect for about 18 months, until the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals created a new and more restrictive approach to speech by professionals. PJI has been representing a psychiatrist, a man who benefited from the banned therapy, and a licensed marriage and family therapist who also oversees the counseling ministry at his church. In the appeal denied today, PJI had raised concerns that the law invades privacy and allows the government to control what is said during counseling within the four walls of a church. ​

Brad Dacus, president of Pacific Justice Institute, commented, “We are deeply disappointed by today’s announcement, because it means young people in California and elsewhere will not be able to get the professional help they seek, due to political correctness. This debate will continue, though, as other states consider similar bans on counselors’ speech, and new court challenges will be filed against such bans. Ultimately, we believe the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning will not stand the test of time, and we are committed to this battle for the long haul.”Dacus recently traveled to Texas and successfully defended another counselor in an administrative hearing for practicing the same type of therapy. Although Texas does not have restrictions similar to California’s, an activist had sought to use state bureaucracy to achieve the same result. Dacus said he expects PJI to be involved in more of these challenges in the coming months.

Previous

Next

The information provided on this website is not legal advice and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is implied by use of this site. Because of the unique nature arising from legal matters, individual review by a knowledgeable attorney should be sought.PJI.org Privacy Policy