It would be interesting to know whether any CFD work been done for studying the aerodynamics around a cricket ball. Of particulat interest would be the explaination for the art of reverse swing. CFD should be able to explain whether such a thing happens due to some special physics or ball tampering.

Hexagonal dimples on golf balls first appeared 20 years ago. I have played both kinds, hexagonal and round. I have not noticed any difference in distance or trajectory, and I hit the ball fairly decent (250 - 300 yards off the tee). From a fluid dynamics viewpoint, I don't see why it should make any difference, either. One could equally play a ball without dimples that has a rough surface. The idea is to make the boundary layer turbulent. The only problem with rough golf balls is that dirt sticks to it, which makes the ball hard to clean. Also, a rough ball would be a drag, literally, on the putting green. The only difference in golf balls, as far as amateurs should be concerned, is the amount of compression. A harder ball flies slightly lower and farther but gives you less 'feel' on your short game.

Interesting article by fluent, however, they have failed to take into account the football valve placement when kicking the ball and valve weight. This can amplify the bending of the ball during flight and dipping of the ball also. Clearly modelling this with CFD is not possible!