But Claire Robinson, research director at Earth Open Source, said: “This
is doublespeak for watering down the EU’s already weak GM regulatory
system to the level of the almost non-existent regulation in the US. The
US system assumes that GM foods are no different from non-GM foods and
so do not require special regulatory oversight or safety tests. [2]

“If the new trade agreement goes through, it will be illegal under World
Trade Organisation rules for the EU to have a stronger regulatory system
for GMOs than the US system. It will be a race to the bottom in which
public health will be the loser.

“The proposed agreement fits neatly with ongoing attempts by the
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the Commission to water down
the EU’s GMO regulatory system to the US level.”

EU laws on GMOs aim at a high level of protection for human and animal
health and the environment. But they have been undermined by weak
guidelines for risk assessment of GMOs developed by the GM
industry-funded International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) and adopted
by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). [3], [4]

In September last year Earth Open Source warned that the EU’s GMO risk
assessment methods would be further weakened by a draft Regulation
currently passing through the Commission’s opaque comitology process. [5], [6] *The draft Regulation is scheduled for a possible vote in a meeting
of the Commission’s standing committee on the food chain and animal
health on 25 February.* [7]

The draft Regulation does not require long-term animal feeding trials on
GMOs, such as that carried out by Prof GE Séralini’s team at the
University of Caen, which found serious health effects in rats fed GM
maize over a long-term 2-year period. [8]

Currently, industry often carries out a short 90-day animal feeding
study on a GMO it hopes to commercialise. But the draft Regulation fails
to make even this type of study mandatory and enables it to be waived in
the future. It also allows the GM food to escape a full risk assessment
and safety testing if it is deemed equivalent to a non-GM food in a
process that is based on assumptions, rather than scientific testing.[5, 6]

Robinson said: “The system laid down in the draft Regulation is not
based on science but on a US-inspired ‘don’t look, don’t find’ attitude
among industry and regulators. It’s now clear that the draft Regulation
and the proposed free trade agreement are working in tandem to dismantle
the EU’s public health protections on GMOs.”

The draft Regulation has reportedly been frozen in its progress through
the Commission’s comitology process, pending agreements on proposals to
allow EU member states to place national bans on growing GMOs.

Earth Open Source recommends that the draft Regulation is abandoned in
its current form and rewritten to uphold existing EU law. It is also
calling for the proposed free trade agreement to be made public and
opened for discussion immediately.

bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. It is strictly non-commercial and for educational purposes only. No one owns it. Open publishing. Multilingual. Global.