Wednesday, February 15, 2012

CINCINNATI (TDB) -- The Ohio Democratic Party has filed a federal complaint accusing Republican State Treasurer Josh Mandel of illegally financing his U.S. Senate campaign with money specifically given to fund his 2010 race for a state office. The Democrats contend Mandel is "emptying his state committee." They say the state treasurer is circumventing federal election laws by dipping into a pot of leftover state campaign money for the Senate seat.

Mandel is running against U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, a Democrat who is completing his first term and seeking reelection. The Democrats want the Federal Election Commission to investigate whether Mandel breached the wall that is supposed to keep federal and state election money in separate pots. The complete text of the Ohio Democratic Party's complaint against Mandel is available after the jump break:

Chris Redfern

Chairman, Ohio Democratic Party

340 East Fulton Street

Columbus, OH 43215

Complainant,

v.

Citizens for Josh Mandel

Kathryn D. Kessler, Treasurer

50 West Broad Street, Suite 1900

Columbus, OH 43215

Josh Mandel

50 West Broad Street, Suite 1900

Columbus, OH 43215

Respondents.

COMPLAINT

Complainant files this complaint under 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(1) for apparent violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA” or the “Act”) against Josh Mandel, Citizens for Josh Mandel, and Kathryn D. Kessler, treasurer (“Respondents”). In 2010, Mandel ran and was elected State Treasurer of Ohio. He is now running for U.S. Senate. From recent state and federal campaign finance reports, it appears that Mandel has been using money left over from his state race to fund his senate campaign. After only a month in to his four year term as Treasurer, and immediately before he declared his candidacy for the Senate, Mandel began emptying his state committee, Citizens for Josh Mandel (the “State Committee”), and appears to have paid for at least 10 trips, including to Utah, New York, and Washington, D.C. for the purpose of taking “political meetings.” Shortly thereafter, contributions to Mandel’s federal campaign began pouring in from the same locations. Given the timing of these trips, they were clearly part of Mandel’s testing the waters activity. Federal law prohibits using state campaign money to support a federal campaign in this manner – this rule is necessary to ensure that only funds that are permissible under federal law are used in a federal race. Accordingly, the FEC should immediately investigate Mandel’s apparent attempts to circumvent the law.

FACTS

Josh Mandel was elected State Treasurer of Ohio on November 2, 2010. Then, less than three months after taking office, he started a run for U.S. Senate. Mandel filed his Statement of Candidacy with the FEC on April 6, 2011 and designated “Citizens for Josh Mandel” as his principal campaign committee. As he is only in the first year of a four year term, Mandel is not currently running for re-election for his position of Treasurer in Ohio. Despite this fact, Mandel’s state campaign committee has been making a number of expenditures for travel for the purpose of “political meetings,” apparently in support of Mandel’s Senate campaign. Overall, Mandel spent over $25,000 out of his State Committee in the first six months of 2011, essentially emptying the account. Almost all of these expenditures were made just before he established his federal committee, and then after launching his federal campaign, he has made essentially no expenditures from the State Account for the rest of the year. This plainly points to the fact that Mandel was using the State Committee to get his federal campaign off the ground before he was able to raise federal contributions.
According to Ohio campaign finance records, Mandel’s state campaign has spent over $8,000 on airfare, hotels, and other travel expenses to visit Utah, New York, and Washington, D.C. including for “political meetings.”[1] Even Mandel’s campaign spokesman has admitted that the trips were made in order to have “political discussions.”[2] In all, his filings and news reports indicate that Mandel took ten trips in the weeks immediately before he filed his Statement of Candidacy in the Senate race.[3] Then, illustrating that the trips were clearly on behalf of his Senate campaign, contributions started flooding in from these same locations. Starting just six days after registering with the FEC, Mandel started receiving contributions from the New York area for his Senate campaign, contributions that totaled over $176,000 in the first three months. Similarly, Mandel received a check from the Washington, D.C. area just two days after registering with the FEC, and over the next months, raised $57,000 from the D.C. area. Some of the travel expenses Mandel’s state campaign made in Washington D.C. may have also been in connection with a reported meeting Mandel had with Senator Jim DeMint to discuss his Senate candidacy.[4]

LEGAL ARGUMENT:

The FEC should investigate whether Citizens for Josh Mandel has accepted a prohibited in-kind contribution from the State Campaign.

The Act places limitations and prohibitions on the sources and amounts of contributions to a federal election campaign. The campaign committee of a candidate for federal office is permitted to raise money only from certain sources, including individuals, partnerships, and political action committees. See 2 U.S.C. § 441a. Many states impose fewer restrictions on contributions to campaigns for state elective offices. In Ohio, for example, individuals and PACs are permitted to make contributions in far excess of the federal limits. This disparity creates concerns about the injection of “soft money” into federal elections in the form of transfers or in-kind contributions between a candidate’s state campaign and federal campaign committee. Explanation and Justification, Transfer of Funds from State to Federal Campaigns, 57 Fed. Reg. 36344 (Aug. 12, 1992).
In order to preserve the integrity of the federal election process, the FEC enacted regulations to specifically prohibit “transfers of funds or assets from a candidate’s campaign committee or account for a nonfederal election to his or her principal campaign committee or other authorized committee for a federal election.” 11 C.F.R. § 110.3(d). As explained by the Commission, this blanket prohibition is a necessary means for ensuring that only permissible funds under the Act are used in connection with a campaign for federal elective office. Explanation and Justification, 57 Fed. Reg. at 36345. A state campaign committee cannot pay for expenses of a federal committee, and even when a candidate is only testing the waters, the funds used by the candidate are subject to the Act’s contribution limits. 11 C.F.R. §§ 100.72(a) and 100.131(a).
Here, all available information indicates that Mandel’s out-of-state trips, made immediately before he filed his Statement of Candidacy, and described as being made for “political meetings,” were for testing the waters and drumming up support for his Senate campaign, and accordingly, it was a violation of the Act for Mandel’s State Committee to pay for such travel.

REQUESTED ACTION

Given the evidence described above, the FEC should investigate whether Respondents violated federal law. Should the Commission determine that Respondents have done so, we request that Respondents be enjoined from further violations and be fined the maximum amount permitted by law.

Yes, they were paid after he was caught red handed as a habitual tax cheat. What an honest guy Sherrod is.

Using that logic a husband who gets caught nailing the babysitter can just tell his wife, "I took care of it honey. We're not sleeping together anymore, so I'm no longer a philanderer. What's the problem?"

It is amazing how many of these corrupt politicians will state people must pay their fair share in taxes, and they are tax deadbeats themselves. They are all for giving hard working individuals money to their pet programs, redistribute wealth, and to create a socialistic society but they refuse to pay their fair share until it becomes public knowledge and they are shamed into paying. I can remember Todd Portune stating, people who do not pay their property taxes are deadbeats. I wonder if Todd will be supporting a deadbeat like Brown?

The people who worship at the feet of Sherrod Brown fail to mention he was also delinquent in paying his taxes in previous years. Once might be an oversight, but multiple times is malfeasance on Brown's part. Brown rails to enforce and raise taxes against others, but has neglected to pay his own share in a timely manner. Hypocrisy & Deadbeat