Pages

Jan 15, 2016

The "Colocaust"

Remember the supposed ‘Holocaust’? Remember how Jews, in
the aftermath of WWII, got most people believing that it actually
happened? It was easy: all they had to do was call themselves ‘Holocaust
survivors’ and tell horror stories of what they supposedly experienced.
It didn’t matter how far-fetched the horror stories were: the sheer
number of ‘Holocaust survivors’ telling roughly similar horror stories
at the same time was all it took to get most people unquestioningly
believing them all. People didn’t demand that the ‘Holocaust survivors’ provide evidence for
their horror stories, instead people just took their horror stories at
face value solely on account of the number of simultaneous horror
storytellers. People didn’t consider that it would have made no strategic sense
for the Third Reich to have done what the ‘Holocaust survivors’ accused
it of doing (from the fact that it needed all the effort it could spare
to fighting WWII and not to manufacturing luxury Jewskin lampshades, to
the utter impracticality of gas chambers, ovens, etc. as methods
of killing people in large numbers), nor did they consider that Zionism stood to (and in fact ultimately did) benefit immensely from
a widespread belief in the ‘Holocaust’, which thus gave Jews a very
strong incentive to conspire in a synchronized lie about it. All the
basic principles - innocent until proven guilty, evidence weighed
against interest – went out of the window as soon as the number of Jews
telling ‘Holocaust’ horror stories became large enough.

Fast forward to New Year’s Eve 2015, and a phenomenon that I hereby coin the ‘Colocaust’,
by which I refer to the supposed ”mass sex assaults” and
supposed ”media coverup” that has been (oxymoronically) all over the
news these last few days. At worst people are blaming it on asylum
seekers as a whole; at best people are saying that we don’t know who the
thousands of assaulters are, and hence should not jump to conclusions.

I agree that we should not jump to conclusions. But by saying we
don’t know who the thousands of assaulters are, we would be jumping to
the conclusion that there were thousands of assaulters. What we
should be ascertaining is whether or not all the ALLEGED
assaults – and that is what they should be called by elementary
standards of journalism, even though the media are virtually unanimously
just calling them “assaults” - even happened in the first place.

All we are dealing with are lots and lots of “mass sex assault” ALLEGATIONS
– and that is all they are – coming in from ‘Colocaust survivors’
all from the same night (not just in Cologne, but also in Hamburg,
Stuttgart, Frankfurt, Duesseldorf, etc.) I have seen NO online videos or
photos that concretely support such allegations. All the videos and
photos that I have been able to find of the night in question show
nothing more than people shooting off fireworks. (I have also seen
far-right channels re-upload old riot videos from the Arab Spring and
other events and falsely claim these as ’Colocaust’ footage, which
further convinces me that no actual ‘Colocaust’ videos exist, for if
they did the far-right channels would have posted the actual videos.) I
am not the only one who has noticed this:

Every single one of these “mass sex assault” ALLEGATIONS by these supposed ’Colocaust survivors’ are being auto-accepted by the media (and then auto-believed by the public) without any demand for evidence,
solely because of the raw number of horror stories being
told simultaneously (something like 120 complaints in Cologne so
far, and I guess a few hundred total in all locations).

To those who so unquestioningly believe that the ‘Colocaust’ was a
“planned asylum seeker jihad operation”, I ask the equivalent question
that I routinely ask people who believe that the ‘Holocaust’ was a
planned Third Reich Final Solution operation: does it make any strategic sense?
If you are waiting for your asylum claim to be processed, can you think
of a worse way to sabotage your own chances of receiving asylum?
Therefore is it even remotely likely that you could be talked into
pulling a stunt like this?

To everyone else, I ask the equivalent of the question that I routinely ask people new to ‘Holocaust’ conspiracy theory: who stands to benefit immensely from widespread belief in the ‘Colocaust’? We all know the answer to that one:

So could the far-right pull off a ‘Colocaust’ hoax? PEGIDA, AfD, NPD,
and other similar groups have a combined support base in
Germany numbering in the hundreds of thousands at least. There are also
at least hundreds of thousands of Jews (ie. sayanim) living in Germany.
Do you think that, from all these, it would be hard to get a mere few
hundred to volunteer as ‘Colocaust survivors’ and go to the police and
media with synchronized fictional horror stories? Remember, most of the
‘Colocaust survivors’ have been telling their horror stories
anonymously, so there is no way to look for group background patterns
(e.g. membership in certain organizations). It would be interesting to
see how many of the storytellers chosen for media attention were Jews,
for a start.

In short, an asylum seeker has massive disincentive against
perpetrating a “mass sex assault”, but the far-right has massive
incentive to file false complaints of “mass sex assault” which they know
will be blamed on asylum seekers. So when hundreds of such complaints
come flooding in, who would you guess are behind most of
them? Seriously, if you were an asylum seeker, would you be interested
in participating in a “mass sex assault”? But if you were a far-right or
Zionist strategist, wouldn’t precisely this ‘Colocaust’ trick be an
obvious opportunistic move for the sake of advancing your
side’s propaganda objectives?

Next, imagine yourself in the perspective of the police: how would
you tell the difference between a real victim reporting an actual crime
and a fake complainer alleging a similar fictitous crime?

Furthermore, the “mass sex assault” ALLEGATIONS have come
from multiple cities across several countries. Which would be
technically easier to achieve? Asylum seekers living in all
these different cities (who don’t even know one another)
communicating with one another for the purpose of coordinating “mass sex
attacks” in all these cities on New Years’ Eve? Or far-right groups in
all these cities (who already know one another) communicating with one
another for the purpose of concocting a mass lie about
what happened on New Years’ Eve? (And again, who has the incentive? Real
sex assaulters gain absolutely nothing from synchronizing their sexual
assault with other sex assaults in other cities. But the far-right gains
much from making the ‘Colocaust’ as spectacular as possible, which
synchronicity across many locations provides.)

And here is the kicker. You would think that those who are sceptical
towards the ‘Holocaust’ would also be sceptical towards the ‘Colocaust’
based on parallel reasoning. But no. Many of the people who usually talk
loudest about the ‘Holocaust’ being 100% fake are the same people who
most blindly accept the ‘Colocaust’ as 100% real. When I suggested
to one such idiot about the possibility of the ‘Colocaust’ being a
far-right or Zionist conspiracy, this idiot assumed that what I meant
was far-rightists/Mossad agents disguising themselves to look like
“Arabs/North Africans” and then carrying out the “mass sex assault” as a
false flag operation. Never did it occur to him that I was conjecturing
the far more efficient approach of mass false accusations
by ’Colocaust survivors’. This was how completely he auto-trusted the
‘Colocaust survivors’. And – I’m not joking – this was a self-proclaimed
“Holohoax expert”. (In contrast, a serious psychological warfare expert
like JAM understands trivially the power of false accusations of sexual
assault as a weapon, which is why the Monarchist Party would make false
accusations of sexual assault punishable by death.)

Am I saying that none of the allegations are true? No, I am
not. Probably there were a few genuine cases in there. Similarly, I have
never claimed that none of the Third Reich concentration camp
guards ever mistreated Jewish inmates. Probably a few did. It goes
without saying that I do not defend the actual criminals in either
case. But just as it is exceedingly likely that the ‘Holocaust’ was a
conspiratorial exaggeration for propaganda objectives, it is as likely
that the same applies to the ‘Colocaust’. Immediately after the night in
question, but before the ‘Colocaust survivors’ started flooding the
police with complaints, Cologne’s police chief was on record as
initially saying: “New Years’ Eve celebrations passed peacefully, in a relaxed atmosphere.”
(Much like pre-’Holocaust-survivor-complaint’ visitors to Third Reich
concentration camps remarked on the nice living conditions they offered
the Jewish inmates.) He would not have said this unless he expected
those present at the celebrations that night to generally agree with
him, in other words this was his sincere impression at the time, which
in turn indicates that many of the horror stories are likely to be
fiction. Here is another source (my bold) that corroborates the police
chief’s initial account and contradicts the zombie movie narrative:

I was at the main station, alone after midnight, as I
often am, happy to have had a lovely night watching fireworks at the
Rhine. Imagine my surprise, six days later, to discover I had been within 100 metres of a roving gang of rapists without noticing that anything was amiss.
… People from home are asking me if I’m frightened. I am more afraid
than I was yesterday, but not of being attacked. I will still walk the
city centre as I have always done and not think twice about it. It’s other people’s fear that makes me wary.

This would also explain why it took several days before the media
started reporting on the ‘Colocaust’; that was the amount of time it
took for all the ‘Colocaust survivor’ horror stories to arrive in
sufficient volume for anyone to even consider this significant enough to
be worth reporting on. There was no “media coverup”, any more than
there was ever a “media coverup” about the ‘Holocaust’ prior to the end
of WWII – in each case, it wasn’t even a phenomenon until the number of horror stories by its respective supposed ‘survivors’ made it into one.

If you prefer to believe every single one of the ‘Colocaust
survivors’, you are entitled to do so. All I am saying is that, in that
case, you had better start believing every single one of the ‘Holocuast
survivors’ also. No double-standards.