NGO Monitor Exposes the HRW-Goldstone Connection

On Tuesday, September 8, 2009, NGO Monitor will release a systematic study on Human Rights Watch (HRW), analyzing its activities related to the Arab-Israeli conflict from 2002 through the middle of 2009. This report recounts HRW’s consistent pattern of ideological bias, lack of professional qualifications in contrast to claimed expertise, and unsupported claims based on faulty evidence.

In advance of the monograph’s publication, NGO Monitor op-eds appeared in the Baltimore Sun and the Jerusalem Post (in response to HRW's executive director Ken Roth’s attack against Prof. Irwin Cotler, who criticized the Goldstone Commission), summarizing some of the report’s findings. These articles also discuss HRW’s obsessive support for the one-sided Goldstone Fact Finding Mission - Justice Goldstone was an HRW board member until the beginning of his mission - and demonstrate how “the fate of [HRW] and Goldstone’s commission are closely connected, and exposure of one’s failings unmasks the other.”

...HRW’s activities in more recent years have been characterized by an obsessive focus on Israel and only muted criticism of dictatorships such as Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Libya....In May, Arab News reported that HRW officials had visited Saudi Arabia to raise funds, using their pseudo-research on Israel over the Gaza war as bait...Serious questions are rightly being asked of a human rights organization that sees fit to have its pockets lined with the gold of one of the world’s most oppressive countries.

NGO Monitor’s detailed research shows that HRW has promoted this strategy by issuing at least 68 calls for “independent investigations” of Israel - including Jenin (2002), Rafah (2004), the Gaza beach incident and the Lebanon war (2006)...The Gaza war gave Roth the opportunity to expand these efforts, and HRW worked closely with the UN Human Rights Council in creating the “independent inquiry” headed by one of its own - Judge Goldstone.

Comment on this item

Name:

Email Address:

Comments:

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Gatestone appreciates your comments. The editors reserve the right not to publish comments containing: incitement to violence, profanity, or broad-brush slurring of any race, ethnic group or religion. Gatestone also reserves the right to edit comments for length, clarity and grammar, or to conform to these guidelines. Commenters' email addresses will not be displayed publicly. Please limit comments to 300 words or less. Longer submissions are unlikely to be published.

1 Reader Comments

Danny • Sep 19, 2009 at 14:50

The problem is, you can analyze UN/UNHRC/HRW reports forever, like we did with Goldstone's report at http://samsonblinded.org/blog/goldstone-report-the-rebuttal.htm
But in the end of the day, many people are only happy to hear anti-Israeli pronouncements and won't discount them based on any rational analysis.

The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute.
Both reserve the right not to publish replies to articles should they so choose.
Gatestone Institute is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization, Federal Tax ID #454724565.