What's happening in Penn St is a direct result of the acceptance of deviant lifestyles choices. When radical left academics are allowed to have free reign again this is the result. From what i've read everyone knew this guy was doing this and apparently these kids were being passed around to boosters as well. There's no doubt Penn St is one of the most liberal colleges out there my question is how much of this kind of thing is going on with other radical left colleges.

When you hear people asking the question "how could this have happened?" Simply put the people running the show (liberal academics) didn't think there was anything wrong with it.

What's happening in Penn St is a direct result of the acceptance of deviant lifestyles choices. When radical left academics are allowed to have free reign again this is the result. From what i've read everyone knew this guy was doing this and apparently these kids were being passed around to boosters as well. There's no doubt Penn St is one of the most liberal colleges out there my question is how much of this kind of thing is going on with other radical left colleges.

When you hear people asking the question "how could this have happened?" Simply put the people running the show (liberal academics) didn't think there was anything wrong with it.

What's your explanation of the Catholic Church doing the same and far more widespread then?

What? What does that have to do with liberal academia fostering this sort of deviant environment? You want to b*tch and moan about catholicism start another thread.

What it has to do with this is that the same thing has happened within the Catholic Church, widespread at that, and they're not liberal. What this means, is that if this can happen in a non-liberal environment, how does it happening in a liberal environment automatically make the liberal environment at fault?

Based on your rationale, I can start decreeing that Jesus encourages raping children.

#21varusword75,
Posted:Nov 14 2011 at 10:00 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) The homosexual community is ensconced in college academia. The radical liberal teachers sell this idea that everything should be tolerated. This is the kind of environment that allows pedophiles and other deviants to prosper.

The homosexual community is ensconced in college academia. The radical liberal teachers sell this idea that everything should be tolerated. This is the kind of environment that allows @#%^philes and other deviants to prosper.

So, y'know, like Ugly said. The Catholic church is the exact opposite of that and they have a fuck load of paedophiles.

The homosexual community is ensconced in college academia. The radical liberal teachers sell this idea that everything should be tolerated. This is the kind of environment that allows @#%^philes and other deviants to prosper.

Interesting theory.

How do you explain the well-known lack of correlation between pedophilia and homosexuality?

How does supporting *** marriage lead to supporting child-rape?

How are radical liberal teachers so effective at corrupting the minds of moderate conservative sports coaches?

This is a quality ******* theory that only can virus bring when he's on his A game. Lately he's been phoning it in but this just drips with hypocrisy and "I was told what to think so it's right!" Way to step your game back up virus.

____________________________

"What doesn't kill you can only make you stronger.............or cripple you for life." - Accari

Varus's theory about this being because of college academics is great except for the niggling fact that most college academics hate football programs and would be thrilled to find any excuse to shut them down.

PS: Paterno is a conservative and a personal friend of Bush

Edited, Nov 14th 2011 11:03am by Sweetums

____________________________

Iamadam the Prophet wrote:

You know that feeling you get when you have a little bit of hope, only to have it ripped away? Sweetums feeds on that.

Penn State University football coach Joe Paterno yesterday offered a no-frills defense for his decision to second the presidential nomination of George Bush at the Republican convention tomorrow night in New Orleans.

____________________________

Iamadam the Prophet wrote:

You know that feeling you get when you have a little bit of hope, only to have it ripped away? Sweetums feeds on that.

Like father like son, since ol' Herbert Walker called Sandusky's charity work one of his "Points of Light."

The OP blew up in varus' face so badly, that I'm in a state of wonderment. How much research do you think he does to come up with these satirical awful arguments that are so loaded with hilarious counterpoints?

He probably heard it on that one talk radio show he jizims over every so often. The best part of Sandusky's charity work? It was for youngsters from broken homes and troubled backgrounds. Like a **** candy store.

____________________________

George Carlin wrote:

I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.

It is a fact that there is a lot of "homosexual pedophilia," as in young boys being exploited by men. This, however, doesn't work the way varus keeps telling himself it does. The gender of the child is immaterial. It's not that a person is attracted to males, and therefore touches male children, it's that a person is attracted to children and touches children. There is generally not a whole lot of sexual attraction to other adults in most cases. Are there a lot of cases in which someone who is normally attracted to the same adult *** touches a small child of either ***? No. There simply isn't. Not when compared to the whole of cases.