(N.B. Note that states differ in their requirements for obtaining consent to use one's image or persona for commercial purposes. Underage issues aside, the primary reason consent is required here is the so-called "right of publicity," which LAW OF FASHION discussed way back in December. In some states, oral consent is insufficient, while in others, it suffices to dispose of a right of publicity claim -- if one can convince the trier of fact that consent was actually given.)

So, you be the fashion lawyer: does this case have legs (spread or otherwise)? Are TEEN MODEL's parents out to vindicate their daughter, who was manipulated by a charismatic photographer for the benefit of an evil corporation? Or are the plaintiffs taking advantage of a legal technicality to score some quick cash from Urban Outfitters and a photographer who believed he had consent from the relevant parties? Share your thoughts with LAW OF FASHION's official LinkedIn group.

[This post is for entertainment and informational purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship among any individuals or entities. Any views expressed herein are those of the writer on the particular date of this post, and should not necessarily be attributed to his law firm or its clients.]

NOTHING IN THIS BLOG CONSTITUTES LEGAL ADVICE, and the information contained herein should never be used as a substitute for consulting a lawyer. Use of this blog does not form an attorney-client relationship among anyindividuals or entities. While the administrators of "LAW OF FASHION" endeavor to ensure the accuracy of all posts, and will promptly correct inaccuracies brought to their attention, no warranty is made as to the thoroughness or accuracy of any blog content. Users of this site release and hold harmless Charles Colman Law, PLLC and all related individuals and entities for any information collected regarding visitors to this site or charlescolmanlaw.com, as well as for any other harm resulting from visitors' use of this site or charlescolmanlaw.com. The views expressed on this site are not necessarily those of Charles Colman Law, PLLC, or its clients.

The maintenance of this site, including the collection and creation of its content, is a service offered in conjunction with: