Why Do Republicans Want To Prop Up A Scandal Plagued President?

It was only a month ago, that major scandal eruptions were rocking the Regime off balance, and Republicans like me were finally smelling blood in the water. We had Benghazi, which had been festering for months, and before that Fast and Furious, we had the wretched IRS scandal, which the average American could understand, the AP/James Rosen scandals that outraged the press, massive ongoing scandals at the EPA, and finally the NSA scandal – which seems to be mostly an issue about trust and competence. These scandals should be burying this Regime. Obama is sliding badly in the polls. People not only don’t trust this government – they fear it.

A month ago, I said, Obama’s agenda for his second term is dead. Even “the Stupid Party” knows better than to work with a Regime as corrupt and scandal plagued as this one, right? Time to stick a fork in Obama’s agenda, right?

We’ve got multiple instances of Regime officials lying under oath to Congress. Anyone at all have a problem with that? Republicans should be spending most of their time undoing the damage this Regime has done, fighting Obama’s agenda, investigating their many scandals, and holding hearings. Period.

What the hell are we doing “reaching across the aisle” to make deals with the same moral cretins who circled the wagons during Fast and Furious and Benghazi, wanted the tea party targeted by the IRS, and were against NSA spying (during the Bush years) before they were all gung-ho for it, (all hail Obama.)

It should be obvious by now, that everything this president does is destructive in one way or another. He started his second term with the transparent desire to win the House in 2014 so he could finish off the Republican party. And damned if we don’t have a Republican party that is helping him do it. We have a president who should be in a free-fall right now, but instead of kicking him while he’s down, we have Republicans who are helping him back up.

Do these R-words have any idea how badly they’re screwing up, right now?

UPDATE:

Ryan talked about the House’s plan to a dubious Mark Levin, last week. Levin noted the government’s history of breaking its promises to secure the border, so why should we trust anything that’s passed, now?

Granted the House plan is leaps and bounds better than the Senate plan, but what happens when the two bodies reconcile their versions of reform? Secure the border now – then take incremental steps toward immigration reform.

(CNSNews.com) – The Internal Revenue Service sent 23,994 tax refunds worth a combined $46,378,040 to “unauthorized” alien workers who all used the same address in Atlanta, Ga., in 2011, according to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA).

That was not the only Atlanta address theoretically used by thousands of “unauthorized” alien workers receiving millions in federal tax refunds in 2011. In fact, according to a TIGTA audit report published last year, four of the top ten addresses to which the IRS sent thousands of tax refunds to “unauthorized” aliens were in Atlanta.

The IRS sent 11,284 refunds worth a combined $2,164,976 to unauthorized alien workers at a second Atlanta address; 3,608 worth $2,691,448 to a third; and 2,386 worth $1,232,943 to a fourth.

Other locations on the IG’s Top Ten list for singular addresses that were theoretically used simultaneously by thousands of unauthorized alien workers, included an address in Oxnard, Calif, where the IRS sent 2,507 refunds worth $10,395,874; an address in Raleigh, North Carolina, where the IRS sent 2,408 refunds worth $7,284,212; an address in Phoenix, Ariz., where the IRS sent 2,047 refunds worth $5,558,608; an address in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla., where the IRS sent 1,972 refunds worth $2,256,302; an address in San Jose, Calif., where the IRS sent 1,942 refunds worth $5,091,027; and an address in Arvin, Calif., where the IRS sent 1,846 refunds worth $3,298,877.

Where’s the outrage?!

Meanwhile Obama is trying to use the “Cool factor”and public schools to sell his disastrous, unpopular and ungodly health care law.

72 freaking percent of us think that Obama’s NSA is likely to have “violated one of the country’s most cherished constitutional standards – the checks and balances between the three branches of government – by spying on the private communications of Congress and judges.”

30 thoughts on “Why Do Republicans Want To Prop Up A Scandal Plagued President?”

As each day unfolds it is becoming more and more abundantly clear that the repubic party is in full retreat and unwilling to stand up to this Chief Executive. This guy keeps taking one wound after another and the repubics seem hellbent on propping him up and not allowing him to fail. Whatever lifelines the repubics aren’t throwing him, the Supremes are, with one ruling after another.

Rush has maintained for a while now that no matter what, the republicans aren’t going to hold this guy accountable for anything. That is quite obvious now and has been for a while. There are numerous grounds for the Impeachment of this President and the republics have no fortitude to hold him accountable. They will not allow the [actual] first black President to fail, they want him severely wounded and damaged but they won’t let him fail and will never Impeach him.

This clown came into office saying that he was going to fundamentally change America, so far he has been pretty successful. He just may go down as one of the most successful Presidents ever, with a huge assist from the opposing party. We just may have gone beyond any hope of recovery, especially with the players on our team.

Although the path may be slightly different, the R’s desire the same end point–the bigger the Government the better…for their Power over the subjects. The only disagreement between the D’s and R’s is over which has control over the distribution of the Trillions our Government is stealing of Americans’ current and future property.

Boehner needs to be asked, point blank, is it within the House’s power to shut down the Federal government? I believe that it is. I believe that this is *exactly* what balance of power means–one branch has the ability to shut it all down if one or two of the others get out of control. If Boehner doesn’t think that’s the case, don’t let the sun set on you in this town. GTFO. The only question that should be up for debate is “at what point?” and personally, I think we’re WAY past that point. Shut it all down.