Description

This was brought up in an R&D meeting a while ago. If we add a second z max switch and attach it to the right z upper and wire the switches in parallel, the x gantry would have to hit both switches to home and subsequently level.
The parts that would need to change are z upper left and right, z max switch harness x idler. We would need to add another endstop switch, a length of t slot dust cover, 2x m2 inserts, 2x m2x10 shcs and m2 washers to the bom. The z max harness bom would need to include 2x solder sleeves, 2x purple faston connectors, and wire length

I have this installed on my machine and it has been working, however would it be possible , that once both end stops are triggered it ends the x-level sequence? Currently it does the same thing where it goes up and triggers both stops but then bounces a few more times. When it does that the x-axis can get out of sync and may not be truly level. I also think it is un-necessary for it to keep leveling once both end stops have been triggered.

@DaniAO i believe this is good to go, but with this change comes removing the x level button in the UI. which i dont think has been touched yet. @marcio can we remove the x level button and replace with the wipe nozzle button?

Running FW .77 on Quiver 7 and these changes appears to have the x-level still enabled for the nozzle offset calibration.

@EricNugent: Yes, the X-axis will still be leveled prior to calibration. The only thing .77 removes is the button for initiating the X-axis leveling at other times. This is because X-axis leveling is now the same as homing Z, which already has a button.