Gavaskar is a shocking commentator. He just spent a whole over repeatedly referring to Clarke as Siddle.

After the first time I expected he would correct himself but...no. I know the Aussie commentators aren't much chop but i swear these guys don't even pay attention half the time.

Shastri is the only decent one. Warney is badass though...he doesn't just tell us what we can already see like most commentators, he actually provides genuine insight into the tactics and psychology in play.

To highlight Gavaskar's complete lack of attention or analytical ability, he has twice today during Jadeja's overs referred to the fact that he does not have as much variety as Ashwin but concentrates on accuracy.

He said it in a manner as if, "well he doesn't need variety because he is very accurate" rather than as a criticism.

Anyone who watches Jadeja bowl for a few overs can see that his lack of variety is not a case of being unable to bowl miracle deliveries like the doosra, carrom, gooly wooly, whatever the ****.

His problem is that he barely even changes his pace, flight or even the angle from which he bowls on the crease...he is like a bowling machine just repeating the same delivery. Even club spinners are aware of the tactic of darting a few in and then tossing one up to entice the big shot.

Anyway, basically what I'm saying is that these pricks aren't as wicked as me.