It is common knowledge that Hannity considers himself a conservative Christian. Well here is what his arrogant “friend” Mike has to say about conservative Christians!

MG:

If our constitution were weak, or the right wing Christians were to be strong in America, they will “impose” God’s will as they interpret, on all Americans like forcing people against abortion, beat up Gay people… bomb the abortion clinics, vandalize mosques, synagogues, Catholic Churches, Hindu, Sikh or Baha’i temples etc. They will make America nearly like Saudi Arabia which is a monarchy and cannot be called an Islamic nation.

(Click on image to enlarge)

As you can see this Mike is a real piece of work, who is clearly using FOX News as a tool for Islam. I know plenty of conservative Christians and they are not calling for violence in America.

MG:

Thank God for our constitution, and some day, I hope democracy permeates in those nations, and I hope we support the people, when that happens, the majority of Saudis, or Iranians would behave the same as Americans – live and let live and mind your own business. The world would be a better place.

Ghouse don’t insult Christians anymore by thanking your Christian hating God for the freedoms of America. Democracy in Egypt has strengthened the Muslim Brotherhood, it is not the save all for the Middle East, and once again you make a broad statement. You are not the spokesperson for the Muslim community, so do not pretend to be. You are just a two-faced Christian hating conman. You HAVE been exposed!!

When this guy speaks about Christians being the oppressors what he really is describing is islam in a nut shell. No Christian would act so oppressive as to force Christianity on the world.. But islam would and is currently doing just that. he is speaking to the sheeple not the people. He is exposed as a fraud and shame on hannity for giving place to the devil.

Mike Ghouse is stealth jihadist. He’s one of many Muslims pulling the Islamic wool over the eyes of gullible Americans. I don’t believe it is possible to be a Muslim and be pro America. Hannity is a fool and he’s doing America a disservice by promoting the LIE of a moderate Islam.

I agree, Tommy! I have not been watching Hannity when he has this guy on, but I don’t know why FOX News would give this guy a platform. It seems the Liberals who are pushing for Multiculturalism, which means exalting the minorities and the minority religions (read Muslims and Islam) over the majority and the majority religion, think they can use the Muslims to do away with Christianity and the Constitution so they can implement a Marxist/Socialist society in the USA. Maybe they think that they can just use the Muslims to do away with Christianity, and then they think that they will be able to do away with Islam as well, since they make up such a small percentage in the USA.

And then do away with islam is going to be impossible. Just look at history: once islam gets a foothold, it’s downhill from there. Recent example is the Pearl of the Middle East, the once beautiful Lebanon turned into a moslim hell hole, after the ‘civil’ war in the 70s, nicely covered up by our libtard press, calling the moslim take over a ‘civil’ war.

Some Islamic spokesmen have usefully explained how possible it is to be a Muslim and pro America:

Samir Khan, US citizen, Al Qaeda member, of North Carolina and New York City,

“I am a traitor to America because my religion requires me to be. We pledge to wage jihad for the rest of our lives until either we implant Islam all over the world or meet our Lord as bearers of Islam.” (www.israelnationalnews.com, Jihad Watch 12 Oct 2010).

Ihsan Bagby, professor of Islamic Studies,

“Ultimately, we [Muslims] can never be full citizens of this country [USA] … because there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country…” (www.faithfreedom.org 31 Mar 2012)

Week by week Afghan security forces working alongside US troops demonstrate terminally how possible it is to be Muslim and pro America. Their murders, like those of Nidal Malik Hasan, the Fort Hood shooter, cast doubt on muslims in the US military.

Rep. Rick Womick, Tennessee, U.S. Air Force veteran:

“Personally, I don’t trust one Muslim in our military because they’re commanded to lie to us through the term called Taqiyya. And if they truly are a devout Muslim, and follow the Quran and the Sunnah, then I feel threatened because they’re commanded to kill me.” http://www.loonwatch.com 15 Nov 2011

Logan is right. Moderate-muslims-to-the-rescue is a fantasy and wishful thinking.

More than 2 years ago, I would have thought the same about Bill O’Reilly…re: “Why is Fox, et al pandering to these muzloid cretins? Can they not see who and what they truly are?”…
The ugly reality is…They know all too well who and what they are. We, as Conservatives, look (past tense for me) to Fox news as a “Conservative” news source…The truth of the matter is, they are WORSE than MSLSD & CNN because they tout their reporting as Conservative news when in fact they are just as Liberal as the rest

They are ALL in the tank with Barry boy & his minions, are getting paid quite handsomely for their lies to the American people. I’ve read thousands, yes thousands of articles from bloggers, yes reputable bloggers (like yourself) who know the truth and are doing the job for the American media. I have not watched cable news in more than 1 year and are more up to speed on what is really happening than most Americans. THANKS TO True Patriots who are not afraid to report the truth…What’s worse is the Lamestream media walk around like roosters with their chest poked out like they’re the elitists of society, lol, it’s the biggest load of crap I have witnessed in a long time…I mean, how can they even look themselves in the mirror each day???

Pardon my French, but SCREW THE MEDIA! Bill O’Reilly, Hannity, & Yes, even (fake cross wearying ) Laura Ingram, they can have their dirty islamic payoff money…One day, they too will pay for their lies…
Why? Because history has proven again and again GOOD ALWAYS TRUMPS EVIL

It was amazing how after Obama was elected O’Reilly kept on saying he would govern from the middle. After a while I just stopped watching it myself. Did you see Pamela Geller’s recent article in which she criticized Ingram? You’re right, we have to be the media.

Good Evening Logan,
Yes, I am a regular reader of Ms Geller. She is one amongst few serious bloggers I read on a regular basis. Interestingly enough, until I read Atlas’ article on Ingram, it was up until that point that I believed she was the only “rational” mind left on Fox, but alas, she’s a traitor just like the rest of them…I remember all too clearly, when I witnessed O’Reilly first interviewed Barry, I could barely pick myself up off the floor…I was beside myself with shock with regard to the softball questions he was lobbing…Not to mention the smug nature of his attitude like he was so worthy of the platform to which he was given by his network muslim enablers…
At the time, I was not as politically astute as I am now, but it was then I knew in my gut, O’Reilly was a traitor and poor little barry was as evil as they come…

An organisation called “Stand Up 4 Islam” recommended Muslims in Britain not to take part in Queen Elizaabeth`s Diamond Jubilee. They were noticeably absent.

Paul Weston, Chairman of British Freedom Party, cites their text and has this to say:

“There is much else to be said about the Stand Up 4 Islam article, but it can be adequately summed up in just a few words. Supreme Arrogance; Base Ingratitude; Sedition; Treason; Racism; Supremacism and Apartheid.”

Of course Chris have an agenda but so do you, arselifter! And that agenda is to pislamize America and the rest of the west. So what’s Loganswarning is all about is to resist this pislamization. We are sort of an underground resistance, much like the ones resisting nazi occupation during WWII. Admitedly not as dangerous yet. We don’t risk torture and execution. At least not yet. And we don’t have to resort to using bombs to sabotage your ongoing occupation. Because that is what it’s all about. Just like the nazi’s, you are invaders and occupiers. But instead of using tanks, you’re using hijra and taqyyia instead. What about Hitler had thought about that? Then most of us would have been sprechen deutch by now.

Wow! Look at what this Islamomaniac says is the Christian agenda. The kind of Christian theology he describes (sometimes called “Dominionism”) may be held by a very small number of Christians. But that number has been declining over the years, anyway.

Thank you Mr. Logan. You are the News. Just like my father in times past, who hid a radio to listen to Swiss Radio News, to find out that the war was lost,as the real News was not told.Very dangerous times and fearful for us children.America wake from your complacent slumber, lest similar dangerous times are upon us. Heed Logan’s warning.

Muslims torture, oppress and kill one another and claim to respect Jesus.
They refuse to call him the Christ, the Son of God, and yet claim to respect Jesus.
They oppress, rape, torture, dispossess and kill Christians, and then claim to respect Jesus.
Muslims are not our friends.
Indeed, they are not even friends among themselves.

I’m a Protestant Christian and this guy lies. While some Christians are not exactly pro gay they do not advocate brutal public executions of them like this guy’s ideology demands and is being done in sharia compliant muslim countries! What a baboon’s ass he is!

Jordanian cleric Omar Mahdi Zeidan …gave a speech praising a jihadist who was killed in a US drone strike in Yemen. …
In the funeral speech, Zeidan offered religious justification for waging jihad against “apostate” Muslims who refuse to abide by sharia, or Islamic law.http://www.JihadWatch.org 1 July 2012

Mike Ghouse does not say he is “against Sharia Law”, although that can easily be the impression gained. He says he is against Sharia Law becoming law, that is, U.S. law. He wants muslims to be allowed to apply Sharia law to themselves (to start with) without making any changes to U.S. law, dressing this up as “religious pluralism”.

The problem is that it is unconstitutional. Such an arrangement would itself require a change to U.S. law to permit it.

Nearly all of the things you say is supprisingly precise and that makes me wonder why I had not looked at this in this light before. Your article really did switch the light on for me as far as this particular subject goes.