Left panel and dedicatee of this essay: Anna Baltzer, a leading Jewish activist in the international campaign to Boycott, Divest, and Sanction apartheid Israel

_

“Thy destroyers shall emerge from within Thee”

– Isiah 49:17

_

“If this hostility, this repugnance had been shown toward the Jews at one time and in one country only, it would be easy to account for the local causes of this sentiment. But this race has been an object of hatred with all the nations amidst whom it has ever settled. Inasmuch as the enemies of the Jews belonged to different races, as they dwelled far apart from one another; as they had not the same customs and differed in spirit from one another, as they could not possibly judge alike of any subject, it must be that the general causes of anti-semitism have always resided in Israel itself, not in those who antagonized it.”

“The Jewish question exists wherever Jews are to be found in large numbers. Wherever it does not exist it is brought in by immigrating Jews ….Antisemitism increases day-by-day and hour-by-hour among the nations; indeed, it is bound to increase because the causes of its growth continue to exist and cannot be removed….When we sink, we become the officers of all revolutionary parties; when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.”

– Theodore Herzl (Jewish Zionist), in The Jewish State²

_

“This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), RosaLuxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, envious malevolance, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played…a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America has gripped the Russian people and become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”

“…the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all the others….the majority of the leading figures are Jews…the principal inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Director of the Red Citadel, or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Cheka has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany….Jewish revolutionaries, the part played in proportion to their numbers in the population is quite astonishing.”

“Zionist leaders during the holocaust….controlled the sources of finance and represented themselves before the world as the spokesmen of the Jewish nation. They alone are responsible for the unfulfilled potential in rescue; in three vital areas they failed and impeded: communication, material aid, and in preventing annihilation. Had these failures stemmed from ignorance…one might excuse. But the bitter truth is that their actions were determined by explicit policy and a fundamental principle. The first and foremost aim was to establish the State – and the masses of European Jews merely served as a convenient means. And wherever there existed a contradiction between the two, the salvation of the masses was subordinated to the needs of the State-in-formation. Zionist leaders saw the spilt Jewish blood of the holocaust as grease for the wheels of the Jewish national state.”

“the members of the Jewish Councils were as a rule the locally recognized Jewish leaders, to whom the Nazis gave enormous powers….this role of the Jewish leaders in the destruction of their own people is undoubtedly the darkest chapter of the whole dark story. In the matter of cooperation, there was no distinction between the highly assimilated Jewish communities of Central and Western Europe and the Yiddish-speaking masses of the East. In Amsterdam as in Warsaw, in Berlin as in Budapest, Jewish officials compiled the lists of Jews to be deported and of their property, to secure money from the deportees to defray the expenses of their deportation and extermination, to keep track of vacated apartments, to supply Jewish police to seize Jews and get them on the trains until, as a last gesture, they handed over the assets of the Jewish community in good order for final confiscation….The truth is that if the Jewish people had been really been unorganized and leaderless, there would have been plenty of chaos and misery but the total number of victims would hardly have been between four-and-a-half and six million.”

“Miss Arendt’s penchant for grand philosopic schemata flourishes on her disdain for historical evidence….To say that the officials of the Judenräte or any other Jews ‘cooperated’ or ‘collaborated’ with the Nazis is semantic confusion and historical misrepresentation.”

Before analyzing the external and internal dynamics of a particular event – in this case the fate of European Jewry during the Second World War – it may be useful to specify the physical dimensions of the drama. The near-universally trumpeted Jewish death toll is “6 million”, a figure sanctified via endless repetition in Zionist, as well as popular and mass media: books, plays, movies, and so forth. In academic works, however, the number starts jumping around: non-Zionist Hannah Arendt, as indicated above, wobbles between 4.5 and 6 million; non-Zionist author Raul Hilberg, in his monumental study, Destruction of the European Jews7(NY, 1979; p. 767) states that 5.1 million Jews perished; and asserts that this was “the world’s first completed (my ital.) destruction process”. Lucy Dawidowicz, the aggressive Zionist author quoted above, claims that the “estimate of 5.7 million Jews killed, made at Nuremburg in 1946, is remarkably accurate” and assures us that, by her own calculation, precisely “5,993,900” Jews went to gas chamber or execution pit8 (p. 403); Benjamin Ginsberg thinks that “more than six million” were exterminated; yet another Zionist author, Leon Poliakov9 (Harvest of Hate, NY, 1979, pp. 331-336) discovers a “demographic deficit” of c. 8,000,000 Jews; while Gerald Reitlinger10 (The Final Solution, London, 1971, p. 546), deconstructs the 1946 Zionist claim and lowers the Jewish body count to 4.2 million. Finally, an anti-Zionist Jew and holocaust revisionist – Auschwitz-survivor Paul Rassinier10.5 – argues that no more than 1,600,000 Jews perished in WW II Europe, while non-Jewish revisionists variously claim that not more than, or even less than 1 million Jews died by various means.

Yet the actual number of Jews who came under the control of the Third Reich and/or its allies is also well established by now; and it is not “6 million” or even 5 million, but about 4.5 million11 (Stephen Challen, Richard Korherr and his Reports, London, 1993, p. 87). Surely, the Nazis (and their collaborators) cannot have liquidated 1.5 million Jews who were not there. Moreover, the number of Jewish survivors is also fairly well known: more than 1,000,000. These include 90% of French Jewry (some 300,000 Jews, an interesting circumstance in itself, since France was half-occupied by the Nazis during 1940-42, and entirely occupied through mid-1944), as well as c. 50,000 Dutch Jews, virtually all the Jews of Denmark, c. 250,000 Reich Jews (German, Czech, and Austrian…of the 200,000 Jews living in Austria at the time of the 1938 Anschluss, 67% survived, while some 150,000 “aryanized” Reich Jews served in the Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, and Kriegsmarine), about 200,000 Hungarian Jews, a similar number of Roumanian Jews, c. 50,000 Bulgarian Jews, about 75% (30,000) of the Jews of Italy, some 50,000 Polish Jews, and so forth.12 Simple subtraction then indicates that the Jewish body count cannot be the iconic “6 million”, 5 million, or even 4 million, but no more than – and perhaps less than – 3.5 million.

Unsurprisingly, when the relevant documents-Einsatzgruppen reports, deportation lists, various ghetto and camp populations – are closely examined, a congruent number emerges. The Einsatzgruppe, Order Police, and other reports quantifying the events at hundreds of Jewish execution sites scattered across eastern Poland, the Baltic States, White Russia, and the Ukraine during 1941-43 are meticulous and precise, based on standardized, routine methods and demonstrably accurate body counts. For example, the 31 December 1941 report by SS-Col. Karl Jaeger, detailing anti-Jewish and other operations carried by his Einsatzkommando 3 (Lithuania) of Einsatzgruppe A (Baltic States) during June-December, 1941, gives dates and locations for each of more than 100 mass executions, sometimes specifying additional circumstances, and each with a precise body count further categorized by gender and adult/child age:

And so forth. Overall, during this June-December 1941 reporting period, the bodies of “46,401 Jews, 55,556 Jewesses, and 34,464 Jewish children”, all routinely shot from behind while standing naked at the edge of open pits, collapsed before the riflemen of Col. Jaeger’s kommando; the wide discrepancy between the numbers of male and female Jews thus liquidated is, incidentally, explained by the fact that “15,000 Lithuanian Jews, most of them Soviet communist officials” managed to flee eastward during the rapid, 22-27 June German conquest of Lithuania (see Yitzhak Arad, “The ‘Final Solution’ in Lithuania in the Light of German Documentation”, YAD VASHEM STUDIES, Vol. XI, p. 234), many of whom left their wives and children behind. Reports filed by other Einsatzgruppen and sub-kommandos further south, operating against Jews, Jewish communists, and communist partisans in White Russia and the Ukraine, are similarly meticulous and detailed, even to the point of describing and offering circumstantial justifications for both individual and collective executions. Thus, on 21 August, 1941, a kommando of Einsatzgruppe C (Ukraine) reported from Staro-Konstantinov that

“…the Jewish Council of Elders spread the rumor that the Russians were advancing again; whereupon the Jews publicly threatened and abused the Ukrainians. Finally it was established that the Jews were conducting a flourishing trade in stolen cattle and goods. In reprisal, the 1st SS-Brigade carried out an action against the Jews…300 male and 139 female Jews were shot.”

While on 28 August, a unit of Einsatzgruppe B (White Russia) in action at Velish, near Minsk, noted that “8 Jews who tried to intimidate the population by spreading false rumors and who were also members of the Komsomol were liquidated in the Kolkhoz Voroshilov….Moreover, the former head of forestry development in Velish, a Jewess, was shot for engaging in sabotage.” A September 4th summary report detailing subsequent Jewish executions carried out by the same Einsatzgruppe tells us that

“Sonderkommando 7a completed another action in Nevel against the Jews, during which 74 of both sexes were shot…in reprisal for arson committed by these Jews. A squad of Sk 7b carried out a search action in Chautsy for communist functionaries….20 Jews and Jewesses who had been active communists were executed. In Slutsk, except for 96 Red Army soldiers who were handed 0ver to the POW camp, a number of Jews were shot who had remained active communists to the end. Among those liquidated were 10 fugitive Jewish families who came from former Polish territory and had moved east with the retreating Russian soldiers. While searching their horse-drawn carts considerable quantities of tinned food belonging to the German Army were found….Einsatzkommando 8 received information that in the ghetto of Minsk the Jews were spreading anti-German propaganda. It was especially effective with the rural population who try to sell their products in the ghetto. Because these Jews had also attacked a member of the local auxiliary police and repeatedly destroyed German Army sign-posts, a new special action was carried out against the Jews in Minsk during which 214 of both sexes were shot. Einstazkommando 9 found 149 Jews and Jewesses in Yanovichi to be NKVD informers and political functionaries, all of whom were treated accordingly ….After 3 German soldiers were killed in the vicinity of Vitebsk, a pacification action was carried out. On this occasion we seized 19 Jews and Jewesses wandering around in the forest were the murders had been committed. They were executed on suspicion of having taken part in the attack and committing arson in Vitebsk. The Vorkommando Moscow was forced to execute 38 Jewish intellectuals of both sexes who had tried to create unrest and discontent in the newly established ghetto of Smolensk.”

Another summary report, filed two weeks later by Einsatzgruppe C (Ukraine), remarks that “in Fastov…order was fully restored only after Sonderk0ommando 4a shot all the Jewish inhabitants between the ages of 12 and 60, a total of 262 of both sexes…thus by 24 August, 1941, a total of 7,152 Jews and Jewesses have been executed by the kommando. In Kamenetz-Podolsk, 23,600 Jews of both sexes were shot in three days by a Kommando of the Higher SS and Police…”. On September 1 and 2, “leaflets and inflammatory pamphlets were distributed by Jews in Berdichev. Since the perpetrators could not be found, a reprisal action was carried out during which 1,303 Jews – among these 875 Jewesses over 12 years of age – were shot.”

And so on. Overall, between June and December 1941 throughout the occupied areas of the Soviet Union, some 535,000 Jews of both sexes were shot during operations that were – as indicated above – congruent with an ongoing, intensifying war against communists and communist partisans. 13 [add re January -July, 1942; + Dubno descrip] During August-November 1942 another 363,000 Jews of both sexes went to the execution pit during identical, security-related operations.14

In the central Ukraine alone, over a two-month span, some 60,000 Jews and Jewesses had to be shot, this in connection with security requirements relating to the prospective location of Hitler’s forward command HQ in Vinnitsa. A photo taken during one such mass execution conveys both the vast scale and, again facilitating accurate body counts, the orderly, repetitive routine of these anti-Jewish operations:

Fall, 1943, saw the final liquidation of the Jewish ghettos in White Russia, during which about 50,000 Jews were shot or deported westward. And early November, 1943, featured the most concentrated anti-Jewish operation carried out in WW II Europe –AktionErntefest, or “Harvest Festival”: the liquidation of 3 large and several smaller Jewish labor camps in the Lublin province of eastern Poland, during which some 42,000 male and female prisoners had to be shot, with the executions taking place over a 2-day span on 3-4 November.15 The Harvest Festival drama, as will be shown, exposes the core dynamic of the Jewish catastrophe in high relief, and it is not as currently imagined: these executions were motivated not by any centralized, programmatic “final solution” of the European Jewish problem, but by a specific, murderous international Zionist initiative(a tit-for-tat reprisal for Churchill’s August, 1943 incendiary bombing of Hamburg, which killed some 42,000 civilian men, women, and children) and a local security issueinvolving the Jewish prisoners themselves who, in fatally hedging a prior, successful collaborationist survival bet when inmates of the Warsaw Ghetto, first precipitated – by stockpiling weapons and ammunition, in an effort to entice local communist partisans to attack the camps – and then, when the plot failed, actively participated in their own extermination. Altogether, the number of Jews who went to the execution pit during 1941-43 comes to about 1 million.

Via ghetto demographies and railroad loading bills – as well as certain intercepted/decoded Third Reich communications – the number of deportees (mostly from Poland) received at the three principal gas chamber-equipped Jewish extermination camps can also established: Belzec, in southeastern Poland, some 432,000; Sobibor, in eastern Poland, 179,000; and Treblinka, north of Warsaw, about 700,000, to a sum total of c. 1.3 million.16 Finally, the Auschwitz labor camp in western Poland, and its crematorium-equipped Birkenau adjunct. The “official” death toll here was, via camp commandant Rudolf Hoess’s so-called “autobiography”, originally pegged at no less than “4.5 million Jews”; a figure which (when it was finally disclosed that Hoess had only agreed to while being savagely beaten by his post-war British Zionist interrogators) has since had to revised downward again and yet again by actual documentation. In fact Auschwitz received c. 550,000 Polish Jews and other Jews deported from western and central Europe during 1942-43: some 400,000 of whom, judged immediately unfit for work (the elderly and the sick, as well as young mothers with dependent children, and pregnant women), were gassed or shot during 1942-44, or, if put to work, eventually perished of malnutrition and disease. Finally, during the great June-August 1944 deportation of Hungarian Jewry – a deportation enabled only by complete collaboration on the part of the Zionist Budapest Judenrät – another 320,000 Jews arrived in Birkenau over a 55-day span; and, when the camp facilities proved entirely inadequate for this vast and unexpected influx, some 270,000 of whom had to be gassed…or, when the crematoria themselves proved inadequate, led naked to cremation pyres prepared in open pits and shot during mass executions of up to 5,000 deportees per day. All this resulting in an Auschwitz body count of not “4.5 million” Jews or “2,500,000” Jews (etc.) but about 700,000 and an overall sum of c. 2 million for the camps; which, when added to the c. 1 million Jews shot during anti-communist and anti-partisan operations in eastern Poland and the occupied Soviet Union, summates to c. 3 million. It may also be of interest to note that this actual, factual (i.e., documentable) Jewish body count falls squarely between the Zionist “6 million” incantation and the rather less false revisionist claim that “perhaps 1,000,000” (or fewer) Jews perished by various means in WW II Europe.18

If the conventional Zionist demography of the Jewish catastrophe has been so falsified, grossly exaggerated by approximately 100%, what about historical dynamics? Is it really true, as asserted by Zion, that “The Nazis” destroyed “The Jews”, and “Israel” rose pristine and phoenix-like from the ashes of the dead? Was it really, in the Zionist Hollywood-textualized version, an “Epic of Martyrs and Heroes”? Were there no grey areas, no vertical texture, no connections between victims and victimizers? The non-Zionist Hilberg in fact emphasizes and to some degree documents “the role of the Jews in their own destruction” (q’s here), while Hannah Arendt, in her beautiful and courageous work, emphasizes the non-dynamic nature of her protagonist – the banal, colorless deportation bureaucrat Eichmann – and focuses instead on the Zionist/collaborationist Jewish Ghetto governments as the decisive element. The persistent Zionist enforcement of metaphysical terms like Holocaust™ and Shoah™, both designed to render the explicable inexplicable – not to mention the current Euro-jailing for years at a time of anyone who dares to question any aspect of the Holocaust™ narrative – also suggests that the truth may be much more complex and interesting, and that this truth might involve facts and causalities which Zion would prefer to censor. Why so? Because, if widely known, these truths would threaten the founding mythology of the Zionist state, and so endanger the State itself. One founding myth, now entirely bunked, involves the so-called “Right of Return” of the Jews to their “historic homeland”. Arthur Koestler’s Thirteenth Tribe, and subsequent works which demonstrate that the genetic origin of Ashkenazic Jewry (90% of the world’s Jews) is southwestern Asia (Khazaria) and Eastern Europe, not Palestine, put book to that lie19…and it is of course no accident that the Jewish Encyclopedia, which during the early decades of the 20th century featured a learned and extensive essay on the Khazars, scrubbed the article post-1948.

So what’s left for the right-wing of organized Jewry? Merely the assertion that the wartime Jewish catastrophe somehow justifies the ongoing dispossesion and massacre of the Palestinian people and their replacement by a “Jewish” state; a “jewish” state where, moreover, two-thirds of the world’s Jews have chosen not to live (n. re current Palestine demography). If, however, it can be shown that Zionist leaders and organizations not merely connived with the Nazis during the 1930s, but subsequently sparked off, facilitated, enabled, aggravated, and escalated the Reich’s anti-Jewish campaign as a matter of cold political calculation – while blocking every avenue of escape except a narrow channel leading to Palestine – then this sole remaining moral rationale for “Israel” also disappears. And the entire Zionist tenure in Palestine reduced to no more than historic mendacity, grand theft, external parasitism, and murderous violence. Let’s now consider other documents and hard facts which Zion might find inconvenient, beginning with the late 1920’s collapse of Jewish immigration to Palestine.

________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________

The twisted roots of Adolf Hitler’s family tree:

”as the snow begins dusting in from the east, I search in vain for a map that still has the hamlet of Döllersheim on it…(then) I happen on a little shop belonging to a rare book dealer who digs up an 1896 German atlas which still shows the hamlet on its map of Austria….just north of a bend in the river Kamp and just east of another little dot called Ottenstein. Ottenstein: the name conjures up a peculiarly memorable phrase, ‘scion of the seigneurial house of Ottenstein’….which appears in a catalog of candidates for the shadowy figure at the heart of the Hitler family romance: the man who fathered Hitler’s father.”

“The place we are fighting through the snow to find is the beginning of the beginning, the primal scene of the mysteries behind the Hitler family romance. The disappearance, the apparently deliberate erasure, of Döllersheim is one of the most peculiar aspects of the tangled Hitler genealogy controversy. The tiny village was literally blasted off the map and out of existence sometime after Hitler annexed Austria. An effort – some partisans in the controversy contend – to erase all traces of certain disreputable events that took place there….Irregularities that gave rise to repeated pilgrimages to Döllersheim in the pre-WW II years by journalists and other interested parties, news of which invariably provoked Hitler into near-apoplectic rages:

“‘People must not know who I am,’ he is reported to have ranted when learning of one of the early investigations into his family history. ‘They must not know where I come from.'”

“The closer we get to our destination, Döllersheim, the more empty and remote from civilization the countryside seems to look, the further back in time we seem to be going. This part of Austria, the Waldviertel – northwest of Vienna, between the Danube and the Czech border – and its scattered peasant-farmer inhabitants remained relatively isolated from cosmopolitan civilization for centuries. With a heavy blanket of snow shrouding the occasional ancient barn and farmhouse, the lonely look and feel of the countryside can’t have differed much from the way it looked a century-and-a-half earlier. When someone – either a local miller or a mysterious stranger with ‘alien blood’ – bedded a peasant woman named Maria Schicklegruber, leaving her pregnant with Hitler’s father and leaving subsequent historians with a legacy of doubt. Doubt that may have haunted Hitler as well….the Waldviertel, a disputed no-man’s-land between between realms Germanic and Slavic…and a rumor that the mysterious stranger who wandered through this borderland was a wandering Jew.”

“A number of Hitler biographers have noted that for centuries the local peasant farmers inhabiting this isolated quarter of Austria have stuck to their less-than-lush land, intermarrying frequently and producing generation after generation of more farmers – conspicuously failing to produce anyone who attracted the notice, much less disturbed the dreams of history. And then suddenly: Adolf Hitler. One postwar German historian, Helmut Heiber of the Munich Institute for Contemporary History, voices the unspoken implication: ‘The aberrational quality of the Hitler family…shows that other blood must have entered the Waldviertel stock…'”

– Ron Rosenbaum, Explaining Hitler20(NY, 1999), pp. 4-8

__________________________________________________________

An interesting discovery:

“Hitler’s dominant haplogroup, E1b1b1, is rare in western Europe but prevalent among north African Berbers….His second most dominant haplogroup is that most common among Ashkenazic Jews.”

Meanwhile, by the late 1920’s, Zion’s colonization of Palestine is failing:

“On 1 July, 1920, the British government ended its military rule in the mandated territory and set up a civilian administration headed by a High Commissioner for Palestine. He was Herbert Samuel, member of a wealthy Jewish banking family and an outspoken Zionist. After an initial influx of Zionist immigrants had raised the Jewish proportion of the population from 8% to 16% by 1926, the balance remained static through the end of the decade. In 1927 the number of Jews actually declined: the 2,713 immigrants were barely half of the 5,071 Jews who picked up and left. By 1930, Jews still made up less than 1/6 of the population….the Zionist scheme for converting Palestine into a Jewish state was in serious trouble.”

But the anti-Jewish attitude of a rising “German” politician is of interest…

Hitler: “Our friends know that the communists are solely in the service of Jewish plutocracy. A Jew who calls himself a communist is, after all, still a Jew. The Jewish problem is a highly complex matter. You know, however, that our ideology is opposed to the interests of the Chosen Race and that we abominate their dance around the Golden Calf….I have already told you that I do not intend to massacre the Jews. Perhaps, however, they should even now be thinking if emigration.”

Breiting: “Herr Hitler, I do not wish to be misunderstood. There are both good and bad people among the Jews. Many gave their lives for their country in the last war. Many wear the Iron Cross. I know many who are bitterly anti-communist. There are Jews who would wish to talk to you quite differently.”

Hitler: “They are few and far between, however.”

Breiting: “They are rarities because they receive such bad treatment from your propagandists. There are able and capable men among them. Think of Einstein, after all.”

Hitler: “….All their knowledge they use against us. Let them go and create unrest among other peoples. We do not need them. We can do nothing with them. I have said many times that propaganda is not a scientific argument but has its roots in national sentiment. The Germanic sentiment is now aflame and the masses march under the swastika banner….The fanatical flood of our people has its goal and it will be directed down broad highways, as Schiller said of the bronze which flowed fully formed from the cast.”

“on 30 January, 1933, Hitler was sworn in as Chancellor….Six months later to the day, Montagu Norman (of the Rothschild Bank of England) vouched publicly for the first issues of Nazi debentures to be sold on the markets of London.”

– Guido Preparata, Conjuring Hitler24(Ann Arbor, 2005), p. 201

______________________________________________________________

…and in America…

“Palestine has the primary place. I was the one who first used the word ‘primary’ some years ago….If I have to choose between Eretz Israel and its upbuilding and the defense of the Galuth, I would say then that the Galuth must perish.”

– World Zionist leader Stephen Wise, 14 February 193425 quoted in Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators (Westport, 1983), p. 104

________________________________________________________

Frustrating and then killing an effective worldwide boycott of the New Reich by liberal and left-wing Jews, Palestine Zionists and the Nazi regime conclude a Trade and Immigration deal – the Transfer Agreement – through which scores of thousands of German Jews, with most of their capital intact, will re-locate to Palestine…and German exports freed up all over the world:

__________________________________________________________

While Mr. Churchill, long intimate with the wealthy, plutocratic Zionist wing of organized Jewry (see: Herbert Samuels), is also brought more firmly into the fold:

“By the end of 1935, Churchill had intimidating debts. No amount of writing dismantled his overdraft…he needed all the financial aid he could get. The President of the Anglo-Jewish Association, Leonard Montifiore, had begun sending him literature on the plight of the German Jews. But it was the Anti-Nazi Council…that would ensure Churchill’s political and financial survival. In response to Churchill’s wishes for a less negative title, they now called themselves The Focus….Funds had been arranged two days earlier at a private dinner in North London, hosted by the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Its vice-president Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, chairman of British Shell, was a Zionist extrovert….At dinner on July 22 at his home, he launched the initial secret £50,ooo fund for The Focus. His associates signed immediate cheques for £25,000 and pledged the rest. A colossal sum for such an organization to butter around in 1936…used to procure journalists and for widespread slushing operations coordinated by Montague Bell. It was Whaley-Cohn who ruled on what The Focus might say….he read each manuscript and amended them profusely, explaining that they had to refute the growing belief among the British public that Naziism had ‘legitimate aspects’….Churchill’s writings were not immune…(when) he wrote an article entitled ‘The Better Way’, Whaley-Cohen made copious alterations on the draft, and Churchill meekly swallowed them….In view of the substantial Jewish financial contribution it would have been surprising if Mr. Churchill had not become by 1937 a committed Zionist.”

– David Irving, Churchill’s War27(NY, 1991), pp. 54-60, 83

_________________________________________________________

As the 1930’s wear on, and the Transfer Agreement runs its course, a second Zionist track appears…throughout Europe, scores of Nazi politicians and Third Reich diplomats are variously shot at, shot and wounded, shot and killed by Jewish assassins; for instance,

“In 1936…David Frankfurter shot to death Wilhelm Gustloff, a Nazi leader in Switzerland….And in 1938, German-born Herschel Grynzspan shot and killed Ernst vom Rath, a German diplomat in Paris”.

– Felix and Miyoko Imonti, Violent Justice28(NY, 1994), passim.

Violent sentiments approved by the aforementioned Stephen Wise, in his address of 12 June, 1938, to the American Jewish Congress:

“American Jews must not make the tragic mistake that German Jews made in pretending to be German and not Jews. I am not an American of Jewish faith. I am a Jew….I have been a Jew for 4,000 years. Hitler was right…He calls Jews a race, and we are a race!”

– Wise, quoted in Grimstad, Antizion (Torrance, 1976), p. 174

__________________________________________________________

…a Zionist murder spree that culminates in the Krystallnacht pogrom, another surge of Jewish emigration, and a sudden hardening of the Nazi attitude toward the Jewish problem. For Hitler, the following statement is deterrant diplomacy; but he has no idea with whom he is dealing. For the Zionist Machiavellians, now with sufficient spear carriers in Palestine, it is sweet music:

“if international finance Jewry within Europe and abroad should succeed once more in plunging the peoples into a world war, the consequence will not be the Bolshevization of the world and therewith a victory of Jewry, but on the contrary the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe.”

Entirely in sympathy with the renascent Nazi threat, Kurt Goldmann (head of the Zionist “Palestine Office” in Berlin” through February, 1939) writes a letter giving his (and Zion’s) view of German Jewry and, indeed, all the remaining millions of (non-Zionist) Jews now trapped in Western and Central Europe:

“an altogether decadent, demoralized Jewry, worn down by internal contradictions….You see Jews in cafés, degenerate types behaving in revolting ways, living out their mindless, empty lives, and you become aware of the downfall of German Jewry from a cultured, sophisticated community into a conglomeration of repulsive, egotistical people.”

– Goldmann, quoted in Bernard Wasserstein, On the Eve – the Jews of Europe Before the Second World War(London, 2012), p. 418

_______________________________________________________

seven months later, Hitler asks Poland to give back certain territories ripped from Germany at Versailles, 1919, in return for which he offers to compensate the Poles with Polish land hijacked by the now defunct Czechoslovak state. But the Polish fascisti – Smigly-Ridz, Beck and Co. – refuse to negotiate and, secretly egged on by Churchill, begin to massacre ethnic Germans in Silesia and elsewhere, and mobilize for war. Hitler then attacks Poland with main force, only to be backstabbed by Britain when Neville Chamberlain – forced by Zionist-stooge Churchill – declares war on Germany. Upon learning of the British declaration, Hitler (who according to later fictions is out to “conquer the world”) turns to his Foreign Minister, v. Ribbentrop, and says ‘Now What?‘”

(TBC)

_______________________________________________________

Notes

In general, Jews believe that “antisemitism” drops from the sky or grows from the ground. That it has nothing to do with Jewish values and behavior, that is all a matter of the individual “psychopathology” of the Goyim, or the social psychology of scapegoating. Both Lazare, on the Jewish universalist Left, and Herzl, on the Jewish racial-nationalist Right, knew better. It is precisely a matter of differential, aggravating Jewish phenomena and plain provably so, via comcomitant variation: for 3,000 years, wherever the Jews have wandered, there has been no “antisemitism” until they arrived at a specific location and then, everywhere and when, it has intensified until the Jews were either annihilated on the spot or fled elsewhere, with the attendant cycle of massacre and counter-massacre, war and revolution, repeating again and again. Lazare thought the advance of socialist Universalism would resolve the Jewish Problem, while Herzl thought a Jewish State in Palestine would settle things down. History, however, has now proved both solutions false: the Jewish attempt to “universalize humanity” via communism has failed, and 2/3 or more of the worlds’ Jews haven chosen to avoid the travails of Zionist-occupied Palestine. The Jewish Problem is thus genetic, inherent and, vis à vis the Nations, insoluble…absent an actual Final Solution, that is, the complete physical extermination of the Jews. Which, factually, did not happen in Europe during WW II.

for country-by-country accounts of the pre-war situation and ubsequent Jewish catastrophe in WW II Europe, cf. Randolph Braham (ed.), Tragedy of Hungarian Jewry – Essays, Documents, Depositions (NY, 1986); Leonard Gross, The Last Jews in Berlin (NY, 1982); Celia Heller, On the Edge of Destruction – Jews of Poland Between the World Wars (NY, 1977); Michael Marrus and R. O. Paxton, Vichy France and the Jews (NY,1986); Jacob Presser, Destruction of the Dutch Jews (NY, 1969); David Weinberg, Community on Trial – The Jews of Paris During the 1930s (Chicago, 1977);

14

15

16

17

18

19. See esp. Eran Elhaik, “The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and Khazarian Hypotheses” (Baltimore, 2012; PDF avail. on the net), a massive DNA study which conclusively proves the largely (90%) Khazar origins of world Jewry…with the remaining 10% being the original semitic-sephardic Roman era Mediterranean diaspora + Mizrahic Jews who remained throughout in the Middle East. Which, of course, further debunks the Zionist “Right of Return” claim to Palestine. When Elhaik asked Harry Ostrer – whose “one race, one place” theory (Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People) was cobbled together to back that claim – to allow him to inspect his data…Ostrer refused to share it. For additional discussion and documentation on the Khazar origins of Ashkenazic Jewry cf. Paul Wexler, The Ashkenazic Jews: A Slavo-Turkic People in Search of a Jewish Identity (1993); John Entine,Abraham’s Children: Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People (2007); David Goldstein, Jacob’s Legacy: A Genetic View of Jewish History(2008); and T. Marrs, DNA and the Jewish Bloodline(2013)