Can we have another status update on how far down the track 2.0 has reached? Is it likely that it will still be released “this year”? Can you give us a little insight into what’s happening other than “lot’s of testing”?

Is there anything that those of us who are more end users of pfsense can do to help?

I’m trying to pitch this more in a “please can you help us appreciate what’s happening” context!

Thanks.
James.

]]>By: Chris Buechlerhttps://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&cpage=3#comment-8231
Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:57:54 +0000http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-8231Peter: if you want to create a package, you’re certainly welcome to submit one and we’ll get it committed. If you want us to, if you’re willing to pay for it we can definitely make that happen, just email me (cmb at pfsense dot org) to discuss further. Otherwise, we have no plans of adding that in the near future.
]]>By: Peter Wuhttps://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&cpage=3#comment-8229
Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:14:44 +0000http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-8229Thank you Chris for the comments!

But will it be possible to integrate the said WANProxy as a package in 2.0? If so, many people can enjoy this useful function.

Our Pfsense firwall works very well here. And we do like your integrated Packages, like Squid, too.

Now we’re wondering whether it’s fine to integrate the WANProxy into Pfsense as a Package? WANProxy runs well on FreeBSD platform so we believe that it should be OK to make smooth integration. It will be very helpful to accelerate certain applications via WAN transmission.
WANProxy’s URL: http://wanproxy.org/

Thank you, Chris!

]]>By: Evert Westmanhttps://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&cpage=3#comment-7877
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 05:40:51 +0000http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-7877I have set up 4 pfsense system and everything running fine, for two of the system i have prepared indenticaly standby pfsense in case of failure.
Never used for two year….

Is it possible in 2.0 to import a local user database with prepared user password.