Welcome to the Aussie Scanners group, register today and join in the fun!!!The main website, forum and tapatalk have all been updated...Why not introduce yourself in the member introductions forum ? ...

Mr Nunya-Biz – I’ll keep it short because your rhetoric is becoming dated.

The facts have been determined. The context has been established. Within those parameters the original answers provided to the OP were correct. Your reply claiming otherwise was not.

The OP has not returned and does not need to for this discussion to come to any decisive end. This matter was ultimately decided back in 2015, well before you joined the forum and authored spurious claims.

Arguing with a fool only proves there are two – an aphorism that is well suited here. As such you won’t be hearing from me again in this thread.

I will however continue to relish in the knowledge that – in your now edited post – you accepted the above and surrendered your argument. Game - Set - Match stands, my conquered friend.

Mr Nunya-Biz – I’ll keep it short because your rhetoric is becoming dated.

The facts have been determined. The context has been established. Within those parameters the original answers provided to the OP were correct. Your reply claiming otherwise was not.

Well, what can I say?

In the absence of clarification from the OP, I suppose I didn't expect any different from you either way…

Your every assertion contained within each and every sentence, quoted from above -Nothing other than pure opinion, determined from nothing other than your very own interpretation.

Given the absence of the OP, ( for the time being ), and neither the presence of either a Magistrate, or a Judge to otherwise rule impartially - I myself find it hard to believe that you still feel that there is only ONE way to interpret the following ;

Thanks for that comit, is there any way to transmit digital without a vk anywhere?

Ah well, 'agree to disagree' it is then…

Funny though - that other word context -

Where's that Written Apology of yours, for failing to grasp exactly that my friend?

Talking about radios being type approved those radios such as say Motorola not having a type approved model for CB use in Australia .Is there a law for having a radio program to UHF CB frequencys and using it accordingly with it not being type approved ?

There are literally heaps of LMR/Commercial Radios that you can repurpose for use on UHF CB.

As for Motorola, to begin with - they produce at least three UHF CB specific radios;- CP476, ( which can also additionally operate on LMR UHF frequencies )- CBPRO- GMCBPRO

But make no mistake, Motorola's DP4601 and DP4801 DMR Radios - are also exceptionally fine radios indeed, once reconfigured for use on UHF CB.

Just about every single Tait Radio from their entire 8100 and 8200 Analogue FM series, are excellent performers once reconfigured for UHF CB - and if money's no problem, then pretty well everything in their 9100 and 9300 series of P25 Radios and 9400 series of DMR Radios, also utterly scream on UHF CB as well.

Don't listen to anyone in here that tells you otherwise, as each of the bonafide LMR/Commercial Radios I have just mentioned to you - have ALL been certified by their respective manufacturers, as compliant to our AS/NZS4365:2011(R2016) requirements.

( Thus meaning they are all PERFECTLY LEGAL to be used on UHF CB, once correctly programmed. )

The above list is far from complete, so don't be shy - Do a little homework, buy a used-thus-now-cheap weapon from eBay, get it correctly reprogrammed, ( if it hasn't already been... ) - and have at it!

There is 2 channels allocated for digital telemetry data not packet so in that case would sstv in a way count as telemetry data if used to send telemetry photos or is this a stuff up on the part of acma that needs better clarification from the regulator.

This is not a stuff up by the regulatory authority and it doesn't require clarification. Telemetry is very restricted on UHF CBRS and doesn't ectend beyond using the service to turn things on and off. Check out the Class Licence conditions here ...

VK6FCRC wrote:There is 2 channels allocated for digital telemetry data not packet so in that case would sstv in a way count as telemetry data if used to send telemetry photos or is this a stuff up on the part of acma that needs better clarification from the regulator.

On the two channels allocated for telemetry data (Channels 22 and 23) you can only transmit for a Total of 10 seconds in any 60 second period.