Five jumper selectors
- it seems that beside jmpstopclk you used negative logic to set their function
- according to the simulations they look correct, but this negative/positive logic mixing is a bit confusing. Would be nice to be consistent and use either negative or positive logic for all

Data and clock lines for all three images
- is confusing that the MSB of the right channel starts with 0 while the MSB of the left channel with 1; so it looks like they are delayed by one clock, but probably not
- for stopped clock mode I also count +1 clock but I don't think this is an issue since only the last X bits will be transferred to the parallel DAC registers (after latch has gone low)

Concerning reclocking I share zinsula's opinion from #388.

A suggestion about board layout: it would be nice to be stack-able above the clock board - probably same size. If it's input would come from the FIFO board then the input connector could be in same position as on the clock board.

Thanks, Zsolt

Thing about it is both PMD100 and SM5842 were typically fed from a CS8412 with Mo=0, m1=1, M2=0, M4=0, which is phillips I2S. I don't remember there being issues.

If the next Fifo is going to offer Sony format, why not offer splitting the data into left and right as well, and shifting registers for different bitdepths.

If it could be flexible enough to plug directly into a pair of PCM1704, PCM56,or AD1865, it would be a huge boon to the whole NOS scene.

Also if we could plug in the Fifo to a pair of PCM1704's at 352.8 we could start making our own 8x oversampling algorthms with the computer.

As far as upgrading the 11289.6 clock on the standard Fifo, I think the Tent €24,37 XO-DIY, is the only option. There seems to be no 256fs clocks on the market that will run at 3.3V.

Your FIFO+reclocker combined with Sabre dac is really impressive, especially when synchronous mode between the dac and reclocker.

When I first fired up SDTrans384 - FIFO plus reclocker( U1 is replaced with NDK NZ2520SD ) - Buffalo2 setup, I immediately noticed this obviously outperforms SDTrans384 - Buffalo2 combo.
Side by side comparison was never needed.

Now I can hear more low-level informations more easily and feel as if near the everything some more precise - bass are better controlled, less harsh Hi, and so on.

Really good job indeed, and I'm glad to see you still seek more improvement and versatility...

Thanks!

Hi wktk_smile,

You are the first guy who implements the integration of FIFO and Sabre32 DAC( or Buffalo) I know so far. Especially running it at synchronized mode. Congratulations! I suspect a lot of people are waiting for this good news.

Thank you so much for sharing your experience. I'm very interested in your hookups. Could you please let us know a bit more details? or some pictures? With the synchronized mode, what frequency of your NDK XO did you use? Actually the Buffalo III I bought just arrived yesterday. Hopefully I could try it next week. I have to focus on upgrading the FIFO and design the new PCM daughter board now.

Thing about it is both PMD100 and SM5842 were typically fed from a CS8412 with Mo=0, m1=1, M2=0, M4=0, which is phillips I2S. I don't remember there being issues.

You can fed I2S into PMD100 or SM5842 but you will loose the LSB and the left/right channels will be reversed. I've done that accidentally so I know. CS8412 supports the right justified format for 16bit or 18bit (no.5 and 6) which is indeed a correct format for both PMD100 and SM5842. I'm using CS8414 with AD1865 in NOS mode so I've sweat on these manuals a lot

The converter board Ian is preparing will support several output formats, including for those DACs you mentioned and the Left Justified format for the digital filters which don't support I2S.

Thank you so much for sharing your experience. I'm very interested in your hookups. Could you please let us know a bit more details? or some pictures? With the synchronized mode, what frequency of your NDK XO did you use? Actually the Buffalo III I bought just arrived yesterday. Hopefully I could try it next week. I have to focus on upgrading the FIFO and design the new PCM daughter board now.

Regards,

XO is NZ2520SD-22.579200M-NSA3449C, and later I also replaced U2 with 24.576mhz one.

they are not fast as ES9018's MCLK, but fine for actual use for playing up to
96khz pcm. While playing 176.4khz and 192khz, bypassing OSF mode was required.

XO is NZ2520SD-22.579200M-NSA3449C, and later I also replaced U2 with 24.576mhz one.

they are not fast as ES9018's MCLK, but fine for actual use for playing up to
96khz pcm. While playing 176.4khz and 192khz, bypassing OSF mode was required.

Hi wktk_smile,

Thank you for the pictures. Very impressed.

Actually, the dual clock board has a reserved double speed mode which could run 45.xxxx and 49.xxxx MHz XO for ES9018 or Buffalo DAC to make us more happy, especially for the synchronized mode. I'll publish the setting document after I conformed that on a real Buffalo III dac. Maybe I still need to inquire you when I go the hookup.

Quote:

Originally Posted by wktk_smile

Although stock XOs may be "generic" ones, I felt they are not bad.
Even with stock XO, FIFOboard + reclocker gives good results.

Yes, at least that is the original clock from a crystal, don't need to trace another input clock.

I agree with you and Zsolt that as only the last n bits will be clocked in before latching. You clearly know more about all that high speed logic stuff and if you think that it has some advantages, leave it.

No problem. It was just me which did not get naming and status of the bits. As long as the combinations are safely described and not ambiguous (logic wise) it's OK.

This is a though one for me. I believe using 4 more clocks will be safe for both. As the DATA and LE lines are quiet anyway during conversion, I believe there is not much performance loss.

Very good. Will you use single flip flops (Potato?) for the sensitive clocks (LE and Bit clock?)

Actually, it helped me identify if all is OK (L/R difference)

Good, so the (dual) clock board is needed to select the correct clock freq and to provide the clean MCLK?
Will we still have the actual functionality on the dual clock board, i.e. the indication of fs and MCLK multiplicator?

Do you mean if you feed the FIFO with Sony format? Is that word length 24 bit, left justified, MSB first after word clock change, and Word Clock high = left channel?
Or do you mean that it should output Sony format, to feed eg. Andrea's SM5842?

All in all, great job Ian. thank you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by vzs

I would leave the "leading clock" for the reasons you mentioned, better to be on the safe side.

With 4 trailing clocks only PCM1702 would benefit of the stopped mode operation while for PCM1704 would be similar to continuous clock mode.
As PCM1704 is the newer and seems to be used by more diyers I would better support this - so to have 2 trailing clocks. But it's all one for me.

You would make fellow diyer andrea_mori happy

If you add another output format I have some arguments for the Left Justified over Sony Format:
- as I understood Andrea wants to connect the FIFO between a CD-Pro and his Sony Format input DAC board. As the CD-Pro outputs 16bit I2S you would have to add 16bit support to the converter to output a correct right justified format for him
- Left justified differs from I2S very slightly: latch should be negated and shifted with one clock - so needs less logic to implement
- digital filters from NPC, TI/BB, PMD all support Left Justified with multiple bit lengths, while Sony Format is supported only for 16bit data; except for NPCs
- the downside is that Andrea would have to make some minor pcb adjustments to set his board for Left Justified format - but hey, this is diy
All in all I'm fine with or without it.

Thanks, Zsolt

Hi Zsolit, Hi Vzs,

It took me quit a bit time revising the I2S to PCM daughter board design from SCK driven to MCLK driven. New design is 100% synchronized state machines. The performance get big improved. Now I can run 384KHz with 256Fs on the board. But I don't know which USB I2S could support.