Yes, but first it should compile... now the problem is that although it is in C++, I don't use templates. I do everything with multiple inheritance, some of my final classes have a 5-7 level deep inheritance diagram from around 30 classes. Now I try to use some static code analysis tool to find the diamonds.

It is a re-implementation of my master thesis, where the main problem of my teachers was that I had to talk with a lot to understand, what is this whole thing about :)

The bios boot code of the qemu tries to read the 11th sector of the iso image, it checks its first byte, it should be zero. If it is non-zero, it gives back an error 0x0004. I think the iso image creation wasn't parametrized enough well.

@2physics Sorry for the silly question. I try to calculate the weak hypercharge of nuclei by summing their components. But it is different for left- and righthanded quarks. I think, in a nuclei, we can calculate as if they would be 50% left-handed, and 50% right-handed. So, can I calculate with the average?

@BernardMeurer I tracked the bios code in the qemu. It tries to read the 11th lba sector, then checks if it first byte is zero. To be able to go further, it must be zero. If it is non-zero, returns with error 0x0004.

@2physics Most similar language is finnish, but even it is quite different. For example, both languages use suffixes instead the prepositions, but even the suffixes meaning the "in" preposition in German and English aren't even similar.

@2physics Everything goes with suffixes, and these suffixes can be combined. For example, plural has also a suffix. Now the translation "in the schools", gets first the suffix of the plural, and then the suffix for the "in".

@peterh also you know written persian is quite different from spoken. and if you try to speak like what you write, it sounds funny :D. the letters are written Arabic , although words are quite different. I mean forexample it's like writing hungarian by english letters.

@peterh btw, you know there are some storage spaces dedicated to internet users freely, to store their data freely. such as on gmail or upload websites and etc.

@peterh my question is about the capability of processing the data or installing programs remotely on some strong processors. Isn't there such a stuff on internet which is free of charge?

@peterh yeah, for example there are some consonants which are not exist in english like : kh, gh, zh(like in mesure, or bonjure)

@peterh no no, I'm not talking about my computer's hardware. I asked, for example you imagine google has a service which allows you to use its computers remotely to process data, or to install a software and run it on their computers.

@2physics There are small providers in your home, and in Russia, China... you don't need to pay a lot of hard dollars for big U.S. companies, they have already far more than they should have. And, as I know, in Iran it is not so simple to pay on the net. But it is simple if you pay for an iranian provider.

@2physics Don't think it would be a problem. In the EU, it has a significant effect to the budgets that people pays a lot to the ebay, amazon and similar US companies. In Iran, there is the possibility for this money to remain in the country.

@BernardMeurer Thus, I use a 64k mobile contact for everything, and use a lot of offline downloading things and localnet solutions. I don't use gmail, I load my mails in the background with an offline imap client, and use my own local mail server. For example.

@2physics Why do you need a virtual server 10000 km far from you? I think, if you want to do something which is better to do out of the country, so or so you can solve it. In your place I would use a small russian provider for the task.

@peterh btw sometimes I think it's not so hard to make a powerful pc using some rather cheap CPUs in a parallel structure.. at least it can solve my problem with my laptop :D I may try to make one and see if it works

@BernardMeurer I probably found the grub-mkrescue problem with a strace, it looked for its files in /usr/lib/x86_64-efi , to have this directory I have to install another grub package :-) Of course it spared me even a simple warning :-) Good night! :-)

Last night dream = super awesome because it is a rather cohesive time travel story. I have so far obtained 3 time travel ideas from it. The dream can also sound like author Mary Sue near the end though because throughout the whole dream the dream and I were battling for the control of the story's ending, despite I am only semilucid

It is however, not free of time travel plot holes, and it seems to challenge my own time travel model a lot as I was seen constantly thinking about it as the events transpired in the dream

@DanielSank Well, we can't be sure. I did consider your idea of completely removing the HW-like close reason for a short time to see what people do instead. I suspect that most people would take it as a sign that homework-like questions are now to be considered on topic, or they would just move on from the question after not seeing an applicable standard close reason; either way, it would lead to many homework-like questions being left open.

Direction in an algebraic sense, is really the interrelation of the vector components. One can see this easily when attempting to visualise the computation of eigenvalues

For example while graphically you will have some solutions to the kernal of some matrix be vectors biting head to tail in a closed loop, or just pairs of vectors cancellign each other out, when these are presented algebraically, they are both done using 3 numbers

So what looks like numbers on paper can actually be very complex objects when drawn geometrically on paper

the pitfalls of visualisation in some context is that as soon you represent the concept on $\mathbb{R}^n$ distortion of the original concept can arise in the form of constraints introduced by the topological and geometrical nature of points in $\mathbb{R}^n$

one example is that you can end up with things that is recognised as a triangle shape while the concept itself does not say anything about triangles

@DavidZ Let me see if I understand the main points of your most recent meta post:

1) Our research thus far says that people use the homework close reason for whatever they want, i.e. there's no clear trend, 2) so you're asking people to come forward and either just say what they use that reason for, or propose a way to gather that information via further research.

Are there any kinetic model of ideal gas that is independent of whether the gas is maxwell boltzmann, fermi or bose, bcause wikipedia said the expression applies for different types of gases depending on how the wavelength compared to the interparticle spacings?

@DanielSank yeah, that's basically the idea except for one thing: with respect to point 1, our (my?) research says that among the factors I used in the survey, there is no clear trend in what people use the HW-like close reason for. There could be a clear trend and it's just something I didn't collect data on. It's worth noting that actually being a homework question, or having educational value, were not on the survey, so I don't believe my results have anything to say about them.

In particular, if one wanted to test the hypothesis that people use the homework-like close reason on questions that they do not believe to be homework, or on questions that they do not believe to be of an educational nature, I don't think this research has anything to say about that hypothesis.

@DanielSank I think it'd have to be $\lambda = h\langle\frac{1}{p}\rangle$, which may be quite different if the distribution isn't sufficiently peaked

what is the connection between two phenomenal states in the smallest of scale while they are divided by plank constant time or choronon with a similar of sense?
even they are not really action as divided by them seft while actually been divided by the plus effect of camera of human,then they must...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life That weird question caused me to revisit the concept of cellular automaton. Now suppose we have rules (be it probablistic or deterministic) does it account for everything we observed so far in the universe. What does phenomenon without rules look like, what exactly is no rules, is it even well defined...?

@Dragonsheep : you can try. I'm not sure you'll get any definite answer to your question. But if you asked me how should physicists read a math text differently from mathematicians? I'd say the physicist should have an eye on the underlying reality. He should ask himself How does this mathematical text relate to the real world?

@SirCumference : not quite. I've said we have no evidence that the universe is infinite. And that there's a non-sequitur wherein people claim a flat universe is an infinite universe. I've also said that I think that the expansion of the universe is evidence that it is not infinite.

@SirCumference : no. All of space. Space is expanding. The universe is expanding. Spacetime isn't. It's a abstract thing that models space at all times, and is therefore a static arena. It's typically depicted as shaped like a flared champagne flute without a stem.

The Universe is all of time and space and its contents. It includes planets, moons, minor planets, stars, galaxies, the contents of intergalactic space, and all matter and energy. The observable universe is about 28 billion parsecs (91 billion light-years) in diameter. The size of the entire Universe is unknown, but there are many hypotheses about the composition and evolution of the Universe.
The earliest scientific models of the Universe were developed by ancient Greek and Indian philosophers and were geocentric, placing the Earth at the center of the Universe. Over the centuries, more precise...

@SirCumference Yeah, that's one meaning of the word. But, for instance, when people say things like "the universe has no center" or "the universe is expanding", they mean a purely spatial extent. You can insist on your "correct" definition all you like, it doesn't change the actual usage of the word at all.

@SirCumference : because stress is directional pressure, and space has its innate stress-energy. If the universe was infinite this would be counterbalanced at all locations. The universe could not expand.

@SirCumference : note that gravity isn't holding the universe together. A gravitational field is a place where light curves and your pencil falls down. But it isn't a place where space falls down. Or up.

@ACuriousMind True. I always thought that the analogy of the Universe being on the surface of a spherical balloon was unintuitive. I get many questions on Astronomy asking if we can "get inside of the balloon"

@SirCumference : the cake has a centre, and an edge. We have no evidence of any higher dimensional curvature as per the balloon analogy. Ergo I have to consider the situation wherein space has an edge. If you were at the "edge of the universe" and you took a step forward, you would find that you couldn't get past this edge. There is no space beyond the edge of space.

I tend to wrap my head around intrinsic curvature by imagining a gird with squished gridlines, so that any object that follows geodesics will have their trajectories "parallel" to those gridlines that are infintesimally close to them

@SirCumference : yes. As far as I know the universe began 13.8 billion years ago. I know of no higher-dimensional curvature, the Planck mission found no evidence of it. IMHO the only option left is a finite universe with some kind of edge.

@dmckee I think you don't have an issue with "sets" because you don't have a preconceived notion of what a "set" is supposed to be. But for manifolds, you do have a preconceived notion of what a "shape" or a "geometric object" is.

O, almost forgot the nonorientable manifolds. In that case if I have a space where the intrinsic curvature has a geometry of an nonorientable manifold, then it is not very clear on how my above "curved gridline painted on a plane" will help without the lines crossing in some really visually cluttered fasihion

suppose I have a moebius strip with a grid overlaid on it. Is it even possible to project this 3D object onto a piece of paper so that the gridlines can correctly represent the curvature and nonorientability of such object?