Comments on: Sarah Palin’s new focushttp://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/07/15/sarah-palins-new-focus/
Global environmental challengesWed, 16 Nov 2016 08:14:55 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5By: Masonhttp://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/07/15/sarah-palins-new-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-340463
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:52:18 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=13459#comment-340463Sarah Palin is doing this just to gain publicity. She is not qualified enough for any of this..
]]>By: D'Annhttp://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/07/15/sarah-palins-new-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-340453
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:38:00 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=13459#comment-340453For those of you whom do not understand why Sarah resigned… Try getting sued by the presidents mafia 15 times.
]]>By: Watcherhttp://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/07/15/sarah-palins-new-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-340411
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:50:21 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=13459#comment-340411This LADY represents the real people of this country, not the lunatic fringe. The multitude and vicious attacks on her only prove the left is definitely scared of her……..You go girl!
]]>By: barryhttp://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/07/15/sarah-palins-new-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-340408
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:17:16 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=13459#comment-340408Thios woman is a god damn idiot, drill in the Arctic Wildlife refuge, nice, nuclear in every state, i cant beleive americans listen to this and would in all honesty vote for this fool to be a president, my god, she would destroy america and the rest of the world what a absolute fool, no green energy at all, and all she wnats is to destroy, kind of like my dog !
]]>By: APhttp://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/07/15/sarah-palins-new-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-340403
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:04:40 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=13459#comment-340403Though she might be considering a presidential position, her resignation demonstrated that she could not handle that of a governor. She signed on for that one, yet did not fulfill her commitment. That to me is more worrisome than any Post editorial.
]]>By: Roberthttp://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/07/15/sarah-palins-new-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-340402
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:01:52 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=13459#comment-340402I’m so torn. Do I really want Palin to go away or is her entertainment value too high? It would be nice to suddenly realize one day that I hadn’t heard anything about her in weeks.

On the other hand, I do get a little tingle when I bring up the news in my browser and see another article about her adventures. What outrageous thing, I ask myself, will she say or do this time? I had this crazy idea of seeing her waxing blithely during an interview while in the background an endangered Aleutian goose she just shot is being field dressed? (Like anything like that would happen.)

All things considered, I believe it would be in the best interest of the country, not to mention the Democratic party, if Palin stayed visible.

]]>By: Celinehttp://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/07/15/sarah-palins-new-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-340399
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:47:19 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=13459#comment-340399Sarah Palin is logically unsound. Not only are conventional fossil fuels polluting the environment,it’s a known fact that in less than 100 years, supply will be depleted. Developing alernative fuels require time and investments. And these contribute towards creating jobs and the GDP.

She says “(cap-and-trade energy plan) is an enormous threat to our economy. It would undermine our recovery over the short term and would inflict permanent damage.”

I think she is a big enough threat to the economy as it is. At a point in history where global warming is a growing concern, consumers are becoming more aware and buying from “green” and environmentally responsible companies. Business enterprises cannot afford to ignore consumers’ “green” sentiment. Doing so will really inflict permanent damage on the economy.

]]>By: Thttp://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/07/15/sarah-palins-new-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-340397
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:07:19 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=13459#comment-340397The only reason this woman gets any time in the public eye is due to pure entertainment value.
The same reason anyone would watch a vacuous Jessica Simpson or Paris Hilton on a reality show.

I must confess I do enjoy her ineffectual ramblings…. hillarious!

]]>By: TellasisPatelhttp://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/07/15/sarah-palins-new-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-340396
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:34:21 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=13459#comment-340396In selecting Gov.Sarah Palin for his VP candidate and thus bringing her on the national stage, Sen. John McCain has shown profound lack of good judgement and has done more harm to our country dwarfing his other achievements.
]]>By: jasonhttp://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2009/07/15/sarah-palins-new-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-340394
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:44:49 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/?p=13459#comment-340394Will she run for president? Looks like she’s trying to set herself up for something. Sure she’ll have to take on a bigger role in the debate about the global warming issue if she runs for prez. The only reason I hold a republican card anymore is my hopes Ron Paul will run again. Other than that it’s a Libertarian vote for me.
]]>