When submitting a meetup, if you create a self post, include in the title either 'Planning' or 'Event' and the link will get special styling. 'Planning' links will appear in green with a pale calendar icon. 'Event' links will appear in bold green with a calendar icon. Any links to a Reddit Gifts Meetup page will also get the 'Event' styling.

Finally remembered to look up some information about this and found that they are open to public feedback now, but only through November 6th. WSDOT is looking for public input about I-90 tolls.
They have an Online Form you can fill out
Go in person to one of the following public forums:

Because our government works to fund projects communally, not "pay what you need", because that system doesn't work. How does one quantify the economic impact of being able to get cargo easily into the Seattle ports? Especially cargo coming from the East? And on and on and on.

But how far do you extend that thinking? Should Idaho or Montana pay for the bridge? They ship stuff through the port.

And what of the long term improvements for the immediate region vs. the losses of not replacing the bridge? We will benefit immediately, in more ways than East WA, with a state of the art bridge that is also designed to handle future light rail. For one thing, heavier trucks will have another route besides the 90, facilitating more efficient shipping.

Microsoft can't float the Eastside forever, so we need to keep improving transport in and out of Seattle. This project is a huge win for the metropolitan area, and it's being funded mostly, as you said, by the community.

the 520 bridge has to be replaced not 90. Should the people that utilize 90 regularly and never use 520 have to carry a huge burden for replacing 520? Wouldn't a gas tax or the like be a bit more reasonable?

The I-90 tolls will disproportionately affect low income folks living outside of the city and commuting in/out of the city for work. Not to mention, the tolls are to pay for a bridge that most people utilizing I-90 don't ever use. I'm strongly against the tolls and feel like the 520 project should be funded with some sort of tax that will more evenly distribute the cost.

The thing is even if you don't drive yourself you benefit from that infrastructure. Roads are community property and the whole community benefits, I don't see why we can't pay for necessary infrastructure with normal sales or other tax increase.

I thought the same until someone pointed out to me that tolls are essentially only a tax on the poor. Those that are living on low wages are disproportionately affected by a toll. If tolls could be fair I would be interested in them.

That's nice. That's also not really how government... works? Unless your plan involves citizens voluntarily yet somehow still magically paying for things like EMS, roads, schools, parks, etc. I'm sure if everyone got to decide how much money to pay into the system individually, based on what they wanted to fund, the government would function perfectly!