I originally voted 3 wr on flex same setup as last year...that was the first vote we took and it passed Matt called it...then somebody changed their vote and all hell broke loose.....lol

FLEX VOTE UPDATE:

NO FLEX: Me, Amanda, Pappy, Byron, Lando

YES FLEX: Daven, Lawl, Sharick, Kase

waiting on LT and Pats

5-4
LT voted standard....pats voted flex....the vote was tied Amanda being the tie breaker...... I'm thinking a no flex win at this point...... then

I was all for Flex when it was 2WR Flex vs 3WR and No Flex

If i was voting for 3WR and Flex vs 3 WR, I would vote for 3 WR

08-03-2012, 06:41 PM

byron

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kase-1

I was all for Flex when it was 2WR Flex vs 3WR and No Flex

If i was voting for 3WR and Flex vs 3 WR, I would vote for 3 WR

yeah we need to improve our voting process....:D

08-06-2012, 08:56 AM

DavenIII

Quote:

Originally Posted by Imgrate

3 wr + flex was not introduced at the beginning. It should not be voted on at all. If 3 wr plus flex was introduced at the beginning (before I made my vote) then I would have voted for 3 wr instead of flex and therefore flex would not have won.

I don't understand this logic, the first vote was 3WR vs 2 WR and Flex, that went 2 WR Flex..everyone participated in that vote, then AFTER that 3WR plus Flex was introduced.

people are acting like Matt decided to change the 2WR flex into 3WR Flex...that's not what happened...it was a separate vote that did that, whether it was an option when we were voting for 2WR+Flex vs 3 WR without flex is irrelevant.

08-06-2012, 09:41 AM

Imgrate

Quote:

Originally Posted by DavenIII

I don't understand this logic, the first vote was 3WR vs 2 WR and Flex, that went 2 WR Flex..everyone participated in that vote, then AFTER that 3WR plus Flex was introduced.people are acting like Matt decided to change the 2WR flex into 3WR Flex...that's not what happened...it was a separate vote that did that, whether it was an option when we were voting for 2WR+Flex vs 3 WR without flex is irrelevant.

Not true. after i voted and before all votes were finalized, the idea of a 3wr +flex was brought up. 3 wr + flex is its own idea in itself, it should not be related to 2 wr + flex. If 3wr + flex was going to ever be an option it should have been brought up before any vote took place. it was not.

08-06-2012, 09:47 AM

Morehead State

Quote:

Originally Posted by DavenIII

I don't understand this logic, the first vote was 3WR vs 2 WR and Flex, that went 2 WR Flex..everyone participated in that vote, then AFTER that 3WR plus Flex was introduced.

people are acting like Matt decided to change the 2WR flex into 3WR Flex...that's not what happened...it was a separate vote that did that, whether it was an option when we were voting for 2WR+Flex vs 3 WR without flex is irrelevant.

The vote was for 2 WR vs. flex vs. 3 WR. 2 WR plus flex won. How then can you have another vote for 3 WR plus flex when we already voted for 2 WR plus flex.
Its like saying..."never mind that we voted for 2 WR plus flex.......lets just ignore that and have a completely different vote"

08-06-2012, 10:11 AM

DavenIII

so what you guys are saying is that it should have been a three way vote? 3WR vs 2WR Flex vs 3WR Flex....I suppose it could have been that way but honestly I don't see much of a difference, if enough people wanted 3WR without flex then it would have beaten 2WR+Flex to begin with....it didn't because it wasn't popular enough, 3WR+Flex beat 2WR+Flex because it was more popular...to me the one that was the most popular won why everyone is changing their mind now after the voting is confusing to me.

so what you guys are saying is that it should have been a three way vote? 3WR vs 2WR Flex vs 3WR Flex....I suppose it could have been that way but honestly I don't see much of a difference, if enough people wanted 3WR without flex then it would have beaten 2WR+Flex to begin with....it didn't because it wasn't popular enough, 3WR+Flex beat 2WR+Flex because it was more popular...to me the one that was the most popular won why everyone is changing their mind now after the voting is confusing to me.

when did the second vote even happen?

08-06-2012, 11:22 AM

byron

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morehead State

The vote was for 2 WR vs. flex vs. 3 WR. 2 WR plus flex won. How then can you have another vote for 3 WR plus flex when we already voted for 2 WR plus flex.
Its like saying..."never mind that we voted for 2 WR plus flex.......lets just ignore that and have a completely different vote"

all votes that pertained to flex should have been on the table ..... given the way it went tho a vote should have been taken on whether or not to have a vote on the compromise...3wr/flex.....we over turned a passed vote without repeal...I can see why some don't like it/that