Net Neutrality Explained. Many consider Net Neutrality a “political” argument – and I try to stay out of politics on a largely “science-derived” channel. But nothing about it needs to be political. Let me give ya a brief synopsis of what the current Net Neutrality rules dictate, and what this country would look like if the policy was eased back.

In a nutshell, net neutrality refers to our right as occupants of the United States to open and unrestricted networks. In essence, ISPs, or internet service providers, are lawfully bound to provide unrestricted access to all websites deemed lawful in the eyes of the government… basically everything that doesn’t violate U.S. or international law, the rights of others, or the rights of corporations. ISPs are not allowed to choke or cut off your bandwidth to any legal website.

So if WOW, under my current service plan, decided to ignore net neutrality rules, they could reduce my 500mbps download speed to, say, 50mbps, for all competitor sites in my area. We have two ISPs here in Panama City – Xfinity and WOW – so WOW could decide to limit my bandwidth to Xfinity-affiliated websites; basically anything related to NBC. They could even terminate my access to these sites and TV shows if Net Neutrality suddenly vanished.

In 2015, the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) classified broadband providers like Verizon, Comcast, CenturyLink, and AT&T as Title II Common Carriers. This means that, in the eyes of common law, ISPs are simply the mediums of exchange – the carriers of information – between the infrastructure (because nobody owns the internet) and the consumer. And it makes sense. Think of it like a mail delivery system. If UPS was assumed to now practice “Mail Neutrality,” they’d deliver packages equally and without bias to those in the same price groups. And they do. Obviously, we have the option to pay more for two-day or overnight shipping, but all Mail Neutrality requires is that those packages shipped within each price bracket be delivered without bias toward particular neighborhoods. The same is true for ISPs under Net Neutrality. I pay about $80/month for cable and 500 megs down. I have friends who pay $60 for cable and 100 megs down. I expect a 500mbps cap when I download content, and my friend expects 100. Simple as that. Net Neutrality Explained But what we don’t expect is to be throttled when we visit sites deemed “less important” or “conflicting” in the eyes of our provider.

One reason Net Neutrality is such a hot-button topic has to do with the limited number of ISPs in given areas of the United States. If you’re watching up to this point in the video, I want you to comment down below with your available internet service providers, and then take a look at a few others. You’ll find that quite a number of people have access to only one or two providers. Without pricing strategies under a competitive model, these monopolies can essentially charge whatever they want for cable. This scene in South Park is has never been more accurate.

If Net Neutrality was repealed or eased back, things online may look very different. And here’s the scarier part: They may look completely different depending on where you live. We rely on open and free access to information. Untampered and uncensored. But if things continue down this road, we may have access to only a couple of news media outlets, local stations, and websites. And since most people are Net Neutrality Explained bound to their current ISP, they won’t have a choice about what they can or can’t see.

I’ll leave you with this: Mr. Ajit Pai, chairman of the FCC – spearheading the net neutrality repeal – was previously a Verizon lawyer. Verizon is the second largest internet service provider in the United States. Now I’ve never been a proponent of big government intervention. This touches politics and I’ll stop there, but I’m 100% against Mr. Pai’s argument that repealing Net Neutrality “puts engineers and entrepreneurs, instead of bureaucrats and lawyers, back in charge of the internet.” Despite whatever grip the FCC has on the internet, Net Neutrality has been a good thing. Aren’t you glad certain sites you visit aren’t throttled? What if your local cable company decided to throttle Netflix? Or Hulu? Or… YouTube? If this legislation passes, expect it. Net Neutrality Explained

Net Neutrality Explained. Many consider Net Neutrality a “political” argument – and I try to stay out of politics on a largely “science-derived” channel. But nothing about it needs to be political. Let me give ya a brief synopsis of what the current Net Neutrality rules dictate, and what this country would look like if the policy was eased back.

In a nutshell, net neutrality refers to our right as occupants of the United States to open and unrestricted networks. In essence, ISPs, or internet service providers, are lawfully bound to provide unrestricted access to all websites deemed lawful in the eyes of the government… basically everything that doesn’t violate U.S. or international law, the rights of others, or the rights of corporations. ISPs are not allowed to choke or cut off your bandwidth to any legal website.

So if WOW, under my current service plan, decided to ignore net neutrality rules, they could reduce my 500mbps download speed to, say, 50mbps, for all competitor sites in my area. We have two ISPs here in Panama City – Xfinity and WOW – so WOW could decide to limit my bandwidth to Xfinity-affiliated websites; basically anything related to NBC. They could even terminate my access to these sites and TV shows if Net Neutrality suddenly vanished.

In 2015, the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) classified broadband providers like Verizon, Comcast, CenturyLink, and AT&T as Title II Common Carriers. This means that, in the eyes of common law, ISPs are simply the mediums of exchange – the carriers of information – between the infrastructure (because nobody owns the internet) and the consumer. And it makes sense. Think of it like a mail delivery system. If UPS was assumed to now practice “Mail Neutrality,” they’d deliver packages equally and without bias to those in the same price groups. And they do. Obviously, we have the option to pay more for two-day or overnight shipping, but all Mail Neutrality requires is that those packages shipped within each price bracket be delivered without bias toward particular neighborhoods. The same is true for ISPs under Net Neutrality. I pay about $80/month for cable and 500 megs down. I have friends who pay $60 for cable and 100 megs down. I expect a 500mbps cap when I download content, and my friend expects 100. Simple as that. Net Neutrality Explained But what we don’t expect is to be throttled when we visit sites deemed “less important” or “conflicting” in the eyes of our provider.

One reason Net Neutrality is such a hot-button topic has to do with the limited number of ISPs in given areas of the United States. If you’re watching up to this point in the video, I want you to comment down below with your available internet service providers, and then take a look at a few others. You’ll find that quite a number of people have access to only one or two providers. Without pricing strategies under a competitive model, these monopolies can essentially charge whatever they want for cable. This scene in South Park is has never been more accurate.

If Net Neutrality was repealed or eased back, things online may look very different. And here’s the scarier part: They may look completely different depending on where you live. We rely on open and free access to information. Untampered and uncensored. But if things continue down this road, we may have access to only a couple of news media outlets, local stations, and websites. And since most people are Net Neutrality Explained bound to their current ISP, they won’t have a choice about what they can or can’t see.

I’ll leave you with this: Mr. Ajit Pai, chairman of the FCC – spearheading the net neutrality repeal – was previously a Verizon lawyer. Verizon is the second largest internet service provider in the United States. Now I’ve never been a proponent of big government intervention. This touches politics and I’ll stop there, but I’m 100% against Mr. Pai’s argument that repealing Net Neutrality “puts engineers and entrepreneurs, instead of bureaucrats and lawyers, back in charge of the internet.” Despite whatever grip the FCC has on the internet, Net Neutrality has been a good thing. Aren’t you glad certain sites you visit aren’t throttled? What if your local cable company decided to throttle Netflix? Or Hulu? Or… YouTube? If this legislation passes, expect it. Net Neutrality Explained

Net Neutrality Explained. Many consider Net Neutrality a “political” argument – and I try to stay out of politics on a largely “science-derived” channel. But nothing about it needs to be political. Let me give ya a brief synopsis of what the current Net Neutrality rules dictate, and what this country would look like if the policy was eased back.

In a nutshell, net neutrality refers to our right as occupants of the United States to open and unrestricted networks. In essence, ISPs, or internet service providers, are lawfully bound to provide unrestricted access to all websites deemed lawful in the eyes of the government… basically everything that doesn’t violate U.S. or international law, the rights of others, or the rights of corporations. ISPs are not allowed to choke or cut off your bandwidth to any legal website.

So if WOW, under my current service plan, decided to ignore net neutrality rules, they could reduce my 500mbps download speed to, say, 50mbps, for all competitor sites in my area. We have two ISPs here in Panama City – Xfinity and WOW – so WOW could decide to limit my bandwidth to Xfinity-affiliated websites; basically anything related to NBC. They could even terminate my access to these sites and TV shows if Net Neutrality suddenly vanished.

In 2015, the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) classified broadband providers like Verizon, Comcast, CenturyLink, and AT&T as Title II Common Carriers. This means that, in the eyes of common law, ISPs are simply the mediums of exchange – the carriers of information – between the infrastructure (because nobody owns the internet) and the consumer. And it makes sense. Think of it like a mail delivery system. If UPS was assumed to now practice “Mail Neutrality,” they’d deliver packages equally and without bias to those in the same price groups. And they do. Obviously, we have the option to pay more for two-day or overnight shipping, but all Mail Neutrality requires is that those packages shipped within each price bracket be delivered without bias toward particular neighborhoods. The same is true for ISPs under Net Neutrality. I pay about $80/month for cable and 500 megs down. I have friends who pay $60 for cable and 100 megs down. I expect a 500mbps cap when I download content, and my friend expects 100. Simple as that. Net Neutrality Explained But what we don’t expect is to be throttled when we visit sites deemed “less important” or “conflicting” in the eyes of our provider.

One reason Net Neutrality is such a hot-button topic has to do with the limited number of ISPs in given areas of the United States. If you’re watching up to this point in the video, I want you to comment down below with your available internet service providers, and then take a look at a few others. You’ll find that quite a number of people have access to only one or two providers. Without pricing strategies under a competitive model, these monopolies can essentially charge whatever they want for cable. This scene in South Park is has never been more accurate.

If Net Neutrality was repealed or eased back, things online may look very different. And here’s the scarier part: They may look completely different depending on where you live. We rely on open and free access to information. Untampered and uncensored. But if things continue down this road, we may have access to only a couple of news media outlets, local stations, and websites. And since most people are Net Neutrality Explained bound to their current ISP, they won’t have a choice about what they can or can’t see.

I’ll leave you with this: Mr. Ajit Pai, chairman of the FCC – spearheading the net neutrality repeal – was previously a Verizon lawyer. Verizon is the second largest internet service provider in the United States. Now I’ve never been a proponent of big government intervention. This touches politics and I’ll stop there, but I’m 100% against Mr. Pai’s argument that repealing Net Neutrality “puts engineers and entrepreneurs, instead of bureaucrats and lawyers, back in charge of the internet.” Despite whatever grip the FCC has on the internet, Net Neutrality has been a good thing. Aren’t you glad certain sites you visit aren’t throttled? What if your local cable company decided to throttle Netflix? Or Hulu? Or… YouTube? If this legislation passes, expect it. Net Neutrality Explained

Salazar’s Birthday Livestream | Science Studio After Hours

Tech Channels include JayzTwoCents, LinusTechTips, BitWit, YesTechCity, and many others. This is a live stream for Greg Salazar’s Birthday. It appears to be alive stream taking place on Saturday, October 28th at 10:00PM CST. This is an automated posting via a watchmon442.

Our systems show that Greg Salazar’s Birthday is in facton the 28th of October and this live stream will be to celebrate his birthday.This information is courtesyofhttps://www.famousbirthdays.com/people/greg-salazar.html

LinusTechTips is another Youtuber that remains the number #1 Technology Youtuber via SocialBlade Technologies.

Listed below’s one point moms and dads have no idea: A lot of motorist’s education courses carry out hardly any to keep your adolescent safe when traveling.

And also the authorities states that doesn’t think chauffeur’s education works whatsoever at creating teenagers much better chauffeurs.

” Even with common appeal of chauffeur learning, clinical assessments show that this carries out not produce safer chauffeurs,” the National Motorway Visitor traffic Safety Administration stated in a 2009 document. “Although it could be ‘good sense’ to believe that motorist education is actually the preferred method to know how to own, the notion that a standard motorist education and learning course can by itself make much safer chauffeurs is confident.”

Given how easy it is to pass a driving test in the United States, most chauffeur’s education courses are actually nothing greater than a general course in how to handle a car.

One of the greatest battles teen safety and security proponents possess is vehicle driver education: Driving colleges are often operated by smaller businessmen as well as are loosely managed. Community institutions have mainly revoked motorist education. And also the financing that might strengthen plans just isn’t really certainly there, predominantly because there is actually simply spotty evidence that motorist’s ed works.

This is actually a chicken-and-egg type of trouble that will certainly maintain redoing until legislators decide it’s opportunity to handle the problem and also firmly insist states boost driver education to where it is actually proved advantageous and worth sustaining along with income tax dollars.

NHTSA has just recently offered specifications that could aid conditions boost chauffeur’s education, defining exactly just what need to be actually educated as well as focused on. They are actually certainly not mandatory regulations, and also that might take years for those standards to flow down off the federal government to conditions.

Till after that, moms and dads must how to discover a good university, understand what abilities their little one will definitely as well as won’t know in motorist’s ed, and also compose the distinction by themselves.

Certainly not all driving education and learning is bad. Some universities are actually bad and some are actually exceptional. Some will show your adolescent how to actually deal with remaining secure while driving, and others are going to spend hrs from their valuable instruction time just showing them to liken park– just what lots of state is actually the toughest part of the vehicle driver exam for a brand-new driver. Some will definitely instruct your children ways to get out of a skid, and also where to put their eyes in a panic situation, while others are going to include regarding the number of from their students have passed the state driver’s test (which is terrible indicator of driving ability).

” Those programs typically aren’t doing along with they may be given that they are thus concentrated on passing the driving test, not on providing adolescents the skills they should keep them safe,” states Troy Costales, vice leader of the Guv’s Freeway Security Organization and the scalp of the Oregon freeway safety office.

The problem with driving universities

Driving universities create that alluring for moms and dads not to question the status quo: They usually pick little ones up right from school as well as lose all of them off in the house. They frequently drive little ones by means of the same course they’ll tackle the driving examination, making certain their trainees do not fall short. Anybody which has actually spent a morning surviving the hassle from the Team of Motor Autos (DMV) performs certainly not wish to have to go through that more than when.

” You would certainly certainly not think the amount of parents that do not wish to involve our driving school since our team will not select children up in your home,” mentions Debbie Prudhomme, manager from Teaching Wheels Vehicle driver Education in Minnesota and mind from the Driving Schools Affiliation of the Americas. “Moms and dads just don’t comprehend.”

There is actually a broad variety of high quality offered in private driving schools, Prudhomme points out. And they do not throw away priceless instruction time driving from property to property, selecting up trainees in their garages.

Tim Reeter from Glen Carbon, Ill., was actually primarily pleased along with the driving school his 15-year-old child Cole participated in. But he points out there are actually still huge spaces in his ability level:

” They do not teach children ways to brake, in order that’s been actually something he is actually still finding out,” Reeter claimed. “And when he’s removing, I must tell him he does not have to go coming from no to the speed limit promptly.”

Posts navigation

Text Widget

This is a text widget. The Text Widget allows you to add text or HTML to your sidebar. You can use a text widget to display text, links, images, HTML, or a combination of these. Edit them in the Widget section of the Customizer.