(NaturalNews) Obama, in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre, stated that mental-health services must be made more available, presumably to stave off future killers.

Of course, this is monstrously wrong, since so many killers have acted under the compelling influence of SSRI antidepressants and other brain meds. The drugs are known to induce violence.

More mental health means more murders.

mussobama (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

Now we hear that Joe Biden‘s presidential task force on gun control is meeting with psychiatrists. Here is what they’re discussing:

Databases. They want to tighten background checks on people who buy guns, and the checks could include discovering whether applicants have ever been under psychiatric care, and if so, what diagnosis(es) was made.

rprprprp (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

In order to do that, there will have to be a comprehensive database and a tracking system that extends into, and from, every psychiatrist’s front desk. Law-enforcement will have access to that database.

What happened to doctor-patient confidentiality? It’s possible this issue can be skirted merely by affirming that a gun-applicant has seen a psychiatrist at some point in time—which fact could exclude him from purchasing a weapon.

Organized psychiatry would, of course welcome a comprehensive database of Americans who have obtained psychiatric care. It makes their profession seem even more official than it already is. And it imparts a tinge of USSR-like power.

ayersflag (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

The implication: “We know who you are. We know you’ve been under the care of a psychiatrist. Wherever you live and work, we can call you crazy if we want to.”

This always was part of the psychiatric agenda, behind the smooth facade of “offering help to those in need.”

The American Psychiatric Association (APA) is also sensitive to the fact that many Americans would never walk into a shrink’s office if they thought that would hinder their chance of owning a gun.

But weighing the pros and cons, the advantage is on the side of linking gun-ownership-refusal with psychiatric-treatment history. That makes the APA more powerful. It brings them closer in concert with law-enforcement.

gophum (Photo credit: GunnyG1345)

It essentially makes the APA and all its doctors into cops right along side local police forces, state police, the FBI, the ATF, DHS, and the US Marshals Service.

Who could resist that promotion?

Of course, in any case involving a murderer, where it’s suspected that a psychiatric drug induced the violence, unearthing that possibility would be cut off at the pass. The sordid facts would be protected/buried by the full force of the federal government. Another perk.

Local mental-health clinics (drug dispensaries) would bloom like weeds. After all, how are you going to prevent violence unless you corral millions more Americans and put them in front of a shrink or a suitable surrogate for “pre-screening?” It’s The Minority Report come to life.

This system eventually burgeons into a full national program to cut violent crime through prevention. And who will be in charge of making delicate judgments about the likelihood that any person will commit murder? The psychiatrists, naturally. More power for them.

This goes beyond deciding whether a resident of the US can own a gun. It invades any aspect of a person’s life to assess his “mental predisposition.” That’s precisely the kind of infrastructure that would come into being.

Don’t imagine for a moment that psychiatrists actually have the ability to make scientific calls on these questions. Their entire pantheon of 297 official mental disorders is such a pathetic fraud that not one physical test exists to make a diagnosis.

No blood test, no urine test, no saliva test, no brain scan, no genetic test.

One Response to After Sandy Hook: how psychiatrists will become policemen

At the risk of sounding like a “global conspiratist” nut, and wasting your time and site space;
I am a frequent reader of Berit Kjos’ Christian Apologetics site. He has posted many articles exposing much of the UN agenda and how it is being implemented here in the States. It is no surprise that Barack Obama will use a chaotic, fearful event like the Sandy Hook massacre to help implement the United Nation’s global model for “mental health and hygeine”. As you suggest, I believe it is simply another way to control and manipulate people. From the Christian worldview, the One World system would need to usher in global change in increments, a bit at a time. Using medical science and medical techniques would certainly bring an air of legitimacy to the process. Populations would be more ready to accept greater control and intervention over their lives if they are led to believe that medical experts are involved “for their own good”. Thanks for this great article, I may re-post it on several other blog sites I am operating, at some future date. I’d like to explore and expose this agenda in more detail!
Here is an article at Berit’s Apologetics site: “The UN Plan for Your Mental Health”,(http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/MentalHealth2-99.html)