On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:59:18 +0200, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Steven,
Hi John,
> Can I please get your help in getting Aaron's last call issues into the
> system.
Sure, but don't forget it was Uli who volunteered to work on the upkeep of
the issue tracking.
> Issue #37 is in the trash because it states that Aaron's 39 issues from
> April 30 was broken into separate mails.
>
> First of all, the issue only has the first 26 of the 30 issues in it, so
> please watch out for that.
If you mean issue 37, then you'll see at the bottom "Message of length
7591 truncated" and a button "Full message", which shows all 39 issues.
I see all 39 separately in the data base. UI/118 has 31-39
> Second, there does not even seem to be a topic for the "Structure"
> section
> of the spec (Section 3), where Aaron's issues 5 through 14 go. However,
> some issues on Section 3 from you, Steven, are in the Model topic (which
> I
> might have thought was for section 4)
The names of the folders don't exactly match the names of the sections,
but section 3 is essentially about the model, so I guess that's why it got
called that.
You can just create a new folder and move issues there if you miss one.
> Third, I think "Model" might be the right topic for Aaron's 15 through
> 19,
> but I think we need one issue for #16 and another for #15 + #17-#19.
They are all comments on section 4, processing model, so I guess that's
why they ended up there ;-)
To split an issue mail up, you can re-edit the mail, and 'redirect' it
(assuming your email agent can do that), so that it gets sent as if coming
from Aaron.
> Fourth, #1 and #15 are good examples because they are covered by other
> people's issues. So, it is unclear if they are not entered because of
> that, but the problem with not entering them is that *Aaron* would never
> get a response to the issue. It seems like we need to enter all of his
> issues even if they are duplicates with others.
#1 is at Model/112
#15 is at Events/115
Or have I misunderstood what you mean?
> Fifth, His section 7 comments don't seem to show up under XPath.
XPath/116
> Sixth, could I please have your help tracing through the rest of his
> issues to make sure they appear, as I gave up looking at about this
> point.
As far as I can see, they are all there.
> Seventh, please make sure #28 is an issue by itself.
Do you mean "28) Section 8.1.1 - the list of events that happen when a
form control goes from being irrelevant to relevant ->
xforms-value-changed only MIGHT be generated. A control can become
relevant without the value of the control's bound node changing at all."?
Just send it as a separate mail.
> Finally, note that I have already implemented almost all of the changes
> needed, so I just need issues made so I can compose and send the replies.
You can send more than one reply to a message, but if you really need to
split an email up, then editing and resending it will do the trick.
Best wishes,
Steven