think fire, clothing, throwing spears instead of rocks, etc. they'd make sounds and noises that have shared meaning, they might worship simple gods or nature, they might sing, they probably laughed, they were human.

Yes, it explains the attraction, but it does not tell you why they attract each other. Einstein's Theory of General Relativity explains why.

You're missing the point and the proven difference between the two ...

Evolution is a hypothetical theory, to date no indisputable evidence can be presented that would withstand scientific\Archeological scrutiny. In fact, to the contrary, there is more than sufficient Archeological evidence to disprove the theory completely.

When considering Gravity, there are two components involved, one is the law of gravity, which is demonstrated using an indisputable formula for calculating reactions, and then there is the theoretical portion that is tied to the hypothesis of why these reactions occur. How gravitational forces are generated involves understanding the earth's relationship to the sun and how those forces generated by the sun maintain distance and revolutions without degradation. And scientifically, we do not have sufficient knowledge of, and understanding about the universe to explain why.

The point I'm making is that once science gains a greater understanding of universal magnetic forces, then the theoretical equation tied to the Law of gravity can be resolved\solved.

- The Law of gravity's theoretical portion is due to lack of understanding.

"Evolution as a process that has gone on in the history of earth can be doubted only by those who are ignorant of the evidence or are resistant to evidence, owing to emotional blocks or to plain bigotry" Stephen J Gould

"Evolution as a process that has gone on in the history of earth can be doubted only by those who are ignorant of the evidence or are resistant to evidence, owing to emotional blocks or to plain bigotry" Stephen J Gould

Your offering would be valid, if and only if Mr. Dawkins and Mr. Gould were NEVER wrong -- and that isn't the case.

If I had a choice between cartoon drawings and graphs coupled with a speech, and concrete indisputable evidence presented by numerous world renowned Archaeologist. Archaeology wins hands down!!!!!

Meave G. Leakey is, together with her husband Richard Leakey, one of the most renowned contemporary paleontologists. She studies fossils in Africa and is a Doctor of Science from University College, London.

***

This paragraph just supports the present day statement that there isn't sufficient evidence to support the theory of evolution.

"Sometime in the next 15 to 30 years, the Kenyan-born paleoanthropologist expects scientific discoveries will have accelerated to the point that "even the skeptics can accept it."