Send me email updates about messages I've received on the site and the latest news from The CafeMom Team.
By signing up, you certify that you are female and accept the Terms of Service and have read the
Privacy Policy.

Some reporters and media critics have claimed that not enough is being written about the trial of Dr. Kermit Gosnell, an illegal abortion provider who operated far outside the bounds of legitimate medical practice. In a recent column forUSA Today, for example, Kirsten Powers claimed that the case is not receiving the attention that it deserves.

As a resident of Philadelphia and an abortion provider, I beg to differ. Gosnell’s atrocities have been covered widely. But what haven’t been covered as much as they should be are the reasons why the women who turned to Gosnell for abortion care were disproportionately low-income women of color who felt they had no other place to turn.

Whether you are a supporter or opponent of women’s health rights, or just interested in things related to reproductive justice, you should know that the Gosnell case has been written about steadily since February 2010, when Gosnell’s clinic was raided by the Drug Enforcement Administration and his license was suspended. The story was widely covered in the national mainstream media and by women’s health advocates in 2011 when the case’s Grand Jury report came out. So while the trial is news, there is little to no information that has not already been reported about Gosnell up to this point.

Indeed, when Google renders about 9,000 hits in 0.15 sec using the search term “Kermit Gosnell,” it’s hard to say this story lacks attention.

But this case is about more than just a practitioner who did bad things. His case embodies the “off-the-grid” abortions we can expect to see in states like Mississippi and North Dakota, where anti-choice harassment and regulations purposefully pass to close all clinics providing legal, safe abortion care mean only one clinic is left in each state, and even those are under threat of being shut down.

Gosnell’s “Women’s Medical Society” was not an unknown entity. In fact, it was surrounded by well-known and respected hospitals and clinics. But because they adhere to safe abortion care practices and because health care is expensive generally, the cost of care at these clinics was often out of reach to women who, without public assistance, don’t have and cannot afford regular health care of any kind.

Gosnell’s operation bears no resemblance to safe abortion care. His entire “practice” was illegal: There were untrained medical “assistants” and abortions performed at viability without medical cause. His “clinic” was unsanitary and unsafe and what Carole Joffe has referred to as a “chamber of horrors.”

Moreover, in a gruesome quid pro quo, Gosnell charged on a “sliding scale” for anesthesia; you got more anesthesia the more money you paid, so the poorer you were, the more pain you suffered. Women who went to Gosnell may have known of other places to receive abortion care, but they were either beyond the legal time limit when they could get an abortion in the state, or they could not afford safe abortion care.

What this case reveals is that the cost of dignity in health care has risen, and the attack on poor women intensified.

These realities underscore the real missing headline. In 2011, the Grand Jury report stated, “We think the reason no one acted is because the women in question were poor and of color.” Almost all of Gosnell’s patients are identified as poor women of color. Still, the mainstream media is largely not paying attention to the issues of race and class inherent in this story, which contribute to the reasons why Gosnell could thrive. Poor, under-insured women are not getting acceptable health care of any kind, but because this story is about abortion, these usually invisible women are suddenly the subject of public pity by anti-choice activists. They were made to suffer until many lives were taken.

In an age of rising stigma, discrimination, widespread misinformation, and violence against providers, facts get trampled. What Gosnell underscores is a point that women’s health and rights advocates have long asserted: Women who need to terminate a pregnancy will go to desperate lengths to do so, and by isolating abortion care, we drive women to back-alley providers.

Anti-choice conservatives know this but seem not to care. Mississippi state Rep. Lester “Bubba” Carpenter (R-Burnsville) put it bluntly at an Alcorn County GOP meeting:

[Y]ou have the other side. They’re like, ‘Well, the poor pitiful women that can’t afford to go out of state are just going to start doing them [abortions] at home with a coat hanger.’ That’s what we’ve heard over and over and over. But hey, you have to have moral values. You have to start somewhere, and that’s what we’ve decided to do. (via the Maddow Blog)

These are the aspects of the story that Kirsten Powers and a handful of others in the media are missing completely. Powers claims that there’s a “deafening silence” in the media surrounding this story. Try coming to live in Pennsylvania—trust me, it is not quiet here. The real deafening silence is on the part of the Powers and other pundits and their inability to see or report on the effects of restrictions such as the Hyde Amendment.

Right now there are 13 freestanding providers of surgical abortion in Pennsylvania, down from 22 two years ago. Legitimate clinics have closed because of new regulations that have nothing to do with providing safe services. Act 122, first presented as HB 574 and SB 732, is the Department of Health Abortion Facility Oversight Act. Under Act 122, clinics that would have passed a routine inspection are now required to adhere to policies as an Ambulatory Surgical Facility. As a result, clinics in Pennsylvania saw more architectural changes than critique of patient advocacy.

Kristen Powers is clearly not in touch with what has been the reality of Pennsylvania abortion access since the Gosnell story broke. There is not one clinic in the 205-mile span between Harrisburg and Pittsburgh. In the 2013-14 session of the Pennsylvania legislature, SB 3 has been proposed to prohibit abortion from being placed for purchase on Pennsylvania’s health insurance exchange, which is a portion of the Affordable Care Act.

As a young Black Philadelphian, and a worker for an independent abortion provider, I feel confident in saying that a certain type of conversation has been sparked. Now, instead of people who morally oppose what I do just being outside my door on Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays, they are emboldened on the state Senate floor to “save women’s lives.” Yet, nothing has been done to provide low-income women with dignified health care, including safe abortion care. If the case of Gosnell, it is not clear to the average reader that there are other “doctors” just like him seeing women who are not accounted for.

This is the gray area of abortion that no one wants to talk about: the women we cannot see for services, the women who we have never seen for services, and the women who are receiving abortions that are not counted by anyone. There is a deafening silence alright: A silence that ignores the daily plight of under-insured, and under-served women living in poverty.

No actually, it isn't. Planned parenthood targets the same women which is why the media has stayed away from this. Most planned parenthood clinics are in poor neighborhoods. Notice, will you, these two statements. Anti-choice ideologues are particularly fond of making all sorts of claims but often do not cite or source these assertions. That is because the vast majority of the time they can't, because these claims are false. Or at the very least grossly misleading. They also know that if they DID attempt to cite their sources, these sources would not hold up very well as legitimate repositories of factual information.

Quoting PurdueMom:

I believe that's the point of the article. Most of the women and, therefore, fetuses/infants were black and poor. That is the answer to your question, Candle.

I have no idea why people do such awful things. But when I read the stories told by the staff, they don't appear to be monsters. I'm curious as to what would drive a person to do such things such as snip the spinal cord of a newborn.

My agenda is if affordable or free abortions were available to the abject poor, monsters like these would not exist.

Quoting Carpy:

You tell me, because I have no clue. Don't give me the "they were poor" bullshit either. I could be dirt poor but it would not cause me to stick scissors in the neck of a living baby and snip its spinal cord. Society is losing its sense of value of human life and THAT does indeed scare me.

Quoting PurdueMom:

Since you have been following the case, tell me why staff helped do this butcher's bidding?

Of course I'm stunned. Who isn't?

Quoting Carpy:

Do you really need to know them personally to be stunned that they could be persuaded to do that?

Quoting PurdueMom:

Tell me the backgrounds of these people, Carpy. You must personally know them to make this statement.

Quoting Carpy:

The people who worked for him and were so easily swayed to ram scissors into the backs of living, breathing babies weren't.

Quoting PurdueMom:

I believe that's the point of the article. Most of the women and, therefore, fetuses/infants were black and poor. That is the answer to your question, Candle.

Quoting candlegal:

How he was able to go for decades butchering women and children is beyond me.

Quoting Carpy:

What is most important to me that is not being discussed is how was able to convince other women to not just go along with it, but to actually murder these children as well. How does society reach that level?

I have never gone beyond the sidewalk. I have never had a reason to go into one and don't intend to

Quoting jllcali:

Have you ever actually used planned parenthood?

Quoting candlegal:

No actually, it isn't. Planned parenthood targets the same women which is why the media has stayed away from this. Most planned parenthood clinics are in poor neighborhoods.

Quoting PurdueMom:

I believe that's the point of the article. Most of the women and, therefore, fetuses/infants were black and poor. That is the answer to your question, Candle.

Quoting candlegal:

How he was able to go for decades butchering women and children is beyond me.

Quoting Carpy:

What is most important to me that is not being discussed is how was able to convince other women to not just go along with it, but to actually murder these children as well. How does society reach that level?

This butcher killed innocent babies, the same thing they do at PP. Both are evil. You seriously think there aren't any butchers in PP? There are two ob/gyns at my Church that are constantly being called in to save a woman's life after she was butchered at PP.

Quoting PurdueMom:

This butcher has nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. It still costs money for an abortion in poor neighborhoods. Don't make this about PP.

Quoting candlegal:

No actually, it isn't. Planned parenthood targets the same women which is why the media has stayed away from this. Most planned parenthood clinics are in poor neighborhoods.

Quoting PurdueMom:

I believe that's the point of the article. Most of the women and, therefore, fetuses/infants were black and poor. That is the answer to your question, Candle.

Quoting candlegal:

How he was able to go for decades butchering women and children is beyond me.

Quoting Carpy:

What is most important to me that is not being discussed is how was able to convince other women to not just go along with it, but to actually murder these children as well. How does society reach that level?

Yeah, right. I can pull stuff out of my butt, too. Back this up with proof and I will be the first to call authorities down there in Texas to investigate any PP that is endangering women's lives by not performing best practice. Texas is so hell bent on closing all PP's, I'm surprised these two wonderful ob/gyns have not demanded such an investigation just for that purpose.

Quoting candlegal:

This butcher killed innocent babies, the same thing they do at PP. Both are evil. You seriously think there aren't any butchers in PP? There are two ob/gyns at my Church that are constantly being called in to save a woman's life after she was butchered at PP.

Quoting PurdueMom:

This butcher has nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. It still costs money for an abortion in poor neighborhoods. Don't make this about PP.

Quoting candlegal:

No actually, it isn't. Planned parenthood targets the same women which is why the media has stayed away from this. Most planned parenthood clinics are in poor neighborhoods.

Quoting PurdueMom:

I believe that's the point of the article. Most of the women and, therefore, fetuses/infants were black and poor. That is the answer to your question, Candle.

Quoting candlegal:

How he was able to go for decades butchering women and children is beyond me.

Quoting Carpy:

What is most important to me that is not being discussed is how was able to convince other women to not just go along with it, but to actually murder these children as well. How does society reach that level?

Thank God—and that’s not just a cliché or figurative speech—that alternative news sources exist. The pressure is on the mainstream media, from those alternative sources, to face up to its ideological blinders that have allowed the Kermit Gosnell trial to go unreported. I wrote about this trial last week. Gosnell is the abortionist who regularly carried out late-term abortions, routinely killing babies born alive. His preferred method was cutting their spinal cords.

The outrage over this man should be taking the country by storm. Instead, most Americans are blissfully unaware of this atrocity. Some of that has to do with the average American’s unwillingness to inform himself about what is going on around him. A somewhat eerie parallel exists between modern Americans who look the other way on abortion and Germans during WWII who shut their eyes to the activities in the death camps right next door.

Yet the media has an obligation to inform even when citizens try to avoid being informed. How many mainstream journalists have attended this trial? One picture is worth more than the typical thousand words.

What you see here is the reserved seating area for the media at this trial. This is not a doctored photo. Some media outlets are tripping over themselves offering rationales for why they haven’t covered this. “It’s a local story,” they say. “We don’t have enough reporters,” they explain. Yet these same outlets have no trouble sending reporters to cover any shooter in a school or movie theater. They have no problem following the rehab stints of their favorite celebrities. By the way, Gosnell murdered more innocent people than Adam Lanza or James Holmes. But that’s an inconvenient truth, and it undermines their narrative for the “pro-choice” position. They will let us know what news is worthy of our attention:

The news media—whether print, broadcast, cable, or internet—needs to be called to account for its dereliction of duty. Conservative news sources have been trying to do that. Let’s see if anything changes as the Gosnell trial proceeds.

I really don't understand this stuff about media silence. Since he was exposed, there has not been a week that has gone by that I have not heard something about this, and how the media is trying to sweep it under the rug.

Me too. I have seen lots of stories about this case in the news. It isn't like nothing else has been going on.

Quoting Bigmetalchicken:

I really don't understand this stuff about media silence. Since he was exposed, there has not been a week that has gone by that I have not heard something about this, and how the media is trying to sweep it under the rug.

Send me email updates about messages I've received on the site and the latest news from The CafeMom Team.
By signing up, you certify that you are female and accept the Terms of Service and have read the
Privacy Policy.