I honestly don't care what people think and will voice my opinions freely. Many of my friends hold the same opinions as me, if not quite as extreme, while others s****** and doubtless talk about me behind my back. Which they are more than welcome to do.

My dad is an old fashioned Labour voter (patches on elbows, beard and warm beer) and always tells me that he didn't raise a racist. Clearly he did . He actually bizarrely believes that Margaret Thatcher is to blame for my views. I've been out for a beer with him about three times this year (a record) and the conversation inevitably turns to race/racism/immigration, partly due I believe, to his fascination with right wing politics. He seems more receptive now to my views than ever before. Maybe he's opening his eyes or maybe I've gradually worn him down, either way even he's struggling to reconcile his left wing beliefs with his wish to join the white flight.

I am surprised that, in this day and age, with almost everybody one speaks with aware of the issues and problems caused by race and immigration, that silky3 still finds herself in such a hostile environment.

With respect, I wonder whether it is to do with her debating style more than the opinions of the people around her. Being a woman, maybe her debating points appeal to emotion rather than logic. She needs to arm herself with more facts.

On the Internet, I believe in "hit first, hit hard, keep on hitting", like this for example...
**************************************************
The hypothesis that blacks are less intelligent than Orientals is supported in four ways.

1. In IQ tests conducted throughout the world, blacks have scored lower than Orientals. Since the tests were devised by white men, mainly, it cannot be cultural bias in favour of Orientals, since Orientals did not devise the tests. The black/Oriental IQ gap is pervasive: it has been known about for many, many years and is found to be true in every part of the world.
2. The high position of blacks in all the negative social indices - theft, robbery, murder, rape, sexual disease, unemployment, lack of education, poverty and welfare dependency, illegitimacy, and so on, is exactly what one would expect from a group with a low IQ. There are no surprises or anomalies. Suppose that the Japanese in Canada scored low on IQ tests. Then it would be legitimate to ask: Why are the Japs in Canada performing so badly in IQ tests? There must be some kind of bias! This would be a legitimate line of enquiry because we know that Japs do well in IQ tests everywhere else, and are not associated with crime and poverty anywhere. But with blacks it is different. In every part of the world blacks do badly on IQ tests, and in every part of the world blacks are disproportionately poor and involved in crime. There are no surprises. There is therefore no reason to look for an alternative explanation for blacks scoring low on IQ tests in, say, the USA. There is nothing “anomalous” that needs to be explained, unlike the case where the Japs were doing badly in IQ tests in Canada alone, and being useful and productive citizens everywhere else.
3. Africa is worse off now than it was 50 years ago. They are still holding out the begging bowl to the Western nations, and now they are turning to China. (China has enough very poor people of its own, and is surely only looking after its own rational self interest in its dealings with Africa.) Anyway, left to their own devices, blacks have shown a complete inability to build a Western style economy or political system. Somehow, colonialism has been blamed for this, but apart from being 50 years ago, -consider how long it took Japan and Germany to recover from the second world war,-
it turns out that those countries that were part of the British Empire are actually slightly better off than those that were not. (Ghana and Uganda better off than Mozambique and Somalia, for instance.)
4. Everyone who has come into contact with blacks and Orientals will know that blacks are not as intelligent as Orientals. Even those white fools that pretend to believe that blacks are the same intelligence as whites and Orientals will not send their own children to a school with a large number of black pupils.

Why should we talk about black low IQ?

1. Because we can never solve problems if the cause of those problems is never properly addressed. For instance, if we continue to plough money into Africa by giving it to Africans to spend, then famines and droughts will continue. If on the other hand we admit that blacks can’t manage their own economies as well as other races, then the West (or East) could recolonise and build reasonably successful nations on the back or white or Oriental managers. African states were never as well off, relative to the rest of the world at the time, and it even appears relative to NOW, as they were when the British governed.
2. If we can’t discuss black low IQ, then the only alternative explanation for blacks not doing well in white societies or in Africa is “white racism”. Now, as with anyone who has been accused of a crime, white people have, colectively, the right to a defence. If they are accused of holding the black man down, then they have the right to tell their side of the story. By citing the masses of evidence of black low IQ, white people are merely defending themselves against accusations that they are treating blacks unfairly. If blacks complain that we are hurting their feelings, then they should not have accused us of “racism” in the first place!

************************************************** *****
But dealing with friends and acquaintances, one needs to be a little more tactful. I think that drawing attention to unfairness is useful. The race murder of Kriss Donald was much worse than that of Stephen Lawrence, but one is still in the headlines fourteen years later. The other, no-one has ever heard of.

Blacks and Asians have all sorts of ethnic organisations to promote their interests, if one was set up for poor working class youths in the Inner Cities the instigators would be arrested.

Or, in fifty years China will be managed and controlled by the Chinese. India will be managed and controlled by Indians, Mexico by Mexicans, Nigeria by Nigerians, and so on, throughout the non-white world. (And good luck to them, I wish them well.) But the indigenous people of the UK - and elsewhere in the West - will have, by then, lost the freedom, security, and identity that can only come from being in possession of one's ancestral homeland. Why is it okay for non-whites to have their own countries but whites must be dispossessed? Why do only countries like the UK have to become multicultural?

Even knowing I am right isn`t enough to stop some of the more stupid members of my family travelling down the path of least resistance. Yesterday, I took my little boy to visit my Mum, and my youngest sister was there as usual. Anyway we got onto the subject of Christmas presents and I said I`d like the hooded sweatshirt from the BNP. My sister started banging on about not giving her money to evil bigots, and how she couldn`t believe I thought myself civilised whilst supporting that kind of hatred and blind bigotry. She said she felt like dating a non-white just to show me how evil I was and to show how much she hated my beliefs. I told her that if she did date a non-white, she would find out just how evil I can be. It hurt me that my own flesh and blood would turn on me like that. I`m an extremely placid man, and very hard to upset, but that got under my skin in a way nothing else could. I still feel the hurt as I`m writing this, I don`t go around telling others what to think, I only give my opinion when asked. WTF right does she, all of 23 years of age and never left home, have to tell me I know nothing about the world and am only a twisted evil bigot? Silly prat!

Well years ago I became estranged from my father because he brought back an indonesian whore from when he was "working" abroad which led to my parents divorce, haven't spoken to him since and I think it would've been better if he had just died.

My mum agrees with me, although she doesn't like to show it. She had hoped I would have been colour blind for the easiness of dealing with wogs, although I have known wogs all my life and so can be 'friendly' with them, even though I'd like to see them all deported.

My sister started banging on about not giving her money to evil bigots, and how she couldn`t believe I thought myself civilised whilst supporting that kind of hatred and blind bigotry. She said she felt like dating a non-white just to show me how evil I was and to show how much she hated my beliefs. I told her that if she did date a non-white, she would find out just how evil I can be. It hurt me that my own flesh and blood would turn on me like that. I`m an extremely placid man, and very hard to upset, but that got under my skin in a way nothing else could.

I think this is something that hurts lots of Whites, that a White person (even your own family) can turn on you in defence of someone that they don't even know, and who wouldn't care less about them. How many Blacks would turn against family in defence of Whites, ask your Sister that.

Your Sister is still young; I said some very insulting and hurtful things to a "racist" family member when I was young and silly and didn't know my arse from my elbow.

None of my friends/family/relations like pakkis or blacks. Indeed my elderly parents would have them on the next boat home.LOL { if only}. As for inter-racial breeding,few things disgust me more. If any of my family or relations were to start an affair with a black or Asian then they most definitely would be outcast .....if they were lucky.

Well years ago I became estranged from my father because he brought back an indonesian whore from when he was "working" abroad which led to my parents divorce, haven't spoken to him since and I think it would've been better if he had just died.

That`s very sad. It must be a painful thing to be rejected by a parent, and watch your poor mother going through the sadness and pain of a divorce. Especially when you realise the person your father is leaving your life for is a non-white, who probably is more interested in living in Britain than your Father. How any white man can feel attraction for those flat-faced whores, I`ll never understand. It must be like making love to an orang-utan.

My dear old ma agrees with much of the stuff I bang on about as do the few other elderly relatives I sometimes see.

The younger ones tend to "know" a bit better than we brainwashed older ones and are much less inclined to speak out but even they are beginning to come around. My mother worries, though, and would have me keep my thoughts and opinions in house if she could wave a magic wand.

And then there is my daughter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by vultrix_wt

I am surprised that, in this day and age, with almost everybody one speaks with aware of the issues and problems caused by race and immigration, that silky3 still finds herself in such a hostile environment... Maybe her debating points appeal to emotion rather than logic. She needs to arm herself with more facts.

My daughter was brought up, for the most part in America, New York in fact, and is well on-message.

I'm afraid that she is not at all well up on "the issues and problems caused by race and immigration" in this country and I'm not sure that arming "herself with more facts" would undermine, to any serious extent, the thought processes of a lifetime.

I haven't seen her in over 17 years and she LOATHES the way I think. After she discovered that iamanenglishman was my own web site there were some pretty hair-raising emails exchanged.

This was, in part, one of these emails:

"If you had read everything at my website, which I grant you, would take about six months, at three hours a night, you would realise that the people I am out to get are the very same people that you criticise in the first three paragraphs of you latest email.

Has it never occurred to you that all the time the elite of the Western World were doing the terrible things you speak of in the world outside, they were doing terrible stuff to their own indigenous poor within it? Why is it that such as yourself never seem to feel any sympathy for poor, white folk of the world? Why would you not be moved by the unhappiness of your own kith and kin if people moved in alongside of them whom they disliked and feared?

Here's an interesting thing, the money needed to get into this country illegally is beyond what many of the indigenous working-class population would ever see in one place in their lifetimes. What this suggests to me is this: those who can afford to come here in the first place must have enjoyed at least the equivalent of a middle-class lifestyle in that part of the world from which they hail. Either that or the money to get them here has been accrued in some illegitimate way or other.

If this analysis is at all accurate, the politically correct have been taking the part of the immigrant haves against indigenous have-nots for over half a century now.

The bad guys who created the conditions you speak of in the rest of the world have deliberately visited the results of their endeavours upon the working-class communities of the western world. The working-class in this country were only ever cannon fodder in the imperialist wars that took wealth away from the third world and those that survived these wars rarely saw the benefits of the wealth the elite had stolen.

All of my and half of your ancestors, the Serfs and Carls of England, never had any kind of say in the matter, they just did whatever they were ordered to do by those you vent your spleen upon in your email.

In 1900, the working poor in this country had a life expectancy of barely forty years. In the 19th century, when the black slaves of the American South were slaving in the cotton fields for that part of the year when the cotton bloomed, my ancestors and yours were slaving a mile underground, 10 hours a day, all year round.

95 percent of those Brits who died in WWI were of working-class origin. Of those married men who died at the front, 8-10 percent of their wives were dead themselves within one year of their husband's death. Which might clue you in to the contempt that those you vilify in your latest email felt for their own indigenous poor.

55,000,000 people died in WWII, almost all of them white European, almost all of them innocent of any crime.

Churchill bombed Dresden for three days, even though the town had no strategic value and was known to be bursting at the seams with refugees. Refugees, most of whom were women and children, who had flooded into it because they believed that they would be safe in the old cultural centre. 35,000 people lost their lives because Churchill wanted to show Joseph Stalin, the second greatest mass murderer in all human history, (Mao Tse Tung was the greatest) that he could be a callous, cold-hearted brute too. This in the immediate aftermath of the Yalta conference, where Churchill had been more or less disregardeded by Stalin and Roosevelt.

And yet, recently, the British people voted Churchill the greatest ever Brit.

Whether you are inclined to realise it or not, it's the propaganda that can elevate a self-loving glory-hound like Churchill to such idiot superstardom that I battle at my web site.

One of the many pithy phrases Churchill came out with was:

"In warfare, truth is so precious it must be safeguarded with a bodyguard of lies."

Which, basically, means that, as far as he was concerned, he could say whatever deceitful thing he wanted to, whenever he thought it fit to say it, as long as the end result was what he and his pals wanted. The dreadful Donald Rumsfeld echoed Churchill's self-serving bulls*** just a few months back.

Churchill promised the British "broad, sunlit uplands" if they'd only fight and die in his monstrous war and, for a while there, from the end of WWII, more or less until the beginning of the 1960s, we Brits believed we had those sunlit uplands.

And then the politicians lit the blue touch paper and began the process which led to the headlong colonisation of the country by people whose culture and attitudes were radically different from our own. The people that flooded in took up residence in the working-class areas and the ethnic cleansing process that I spoke of began.

My guess is that between two and three million British people (13 million I have since discovered!) have felt it necessary to move out of their own ancient neighbourhoods in the last 50 years. Most of those who moved out would not have done so had it not been for the outsiders moving in. And I'm supposed to be on the side of those who have usurped them? I'm not supposed to raise a fuss at the mass disenfranchisement of my own people, just because, once upon a time, the creepy bunch at the top of the tree ruled the international roost? I'm supposed to sit back and take it? I'm supposed to think, perhaps, that such people as we are deserve everything we get because of our unavoidable historical association with the dirty, little doings of our own leaders throughout the ages

The reason my web site exists is to point out those things these "leaders" have kept from the British people whilst the colonising process was taking place. If the British working-classes had been allowed to know how much more murderous the immigrant was than himself, how much more inclined to rape and gang-rape, how much more lawless, self-serving, intolerant and generally dissolute they were than us, the New World Order's plan for this country would have been nipped in the bud as the British people wouldn't have stood for it.

What we got instead was happy-clappy land, how much better they are than we are and how much worse we are than them. Over and over again. Mass propaganda and brainwashing via the TV screen, the press, recording industry and the rest of the globalist media, in other words.

The black youth, Stephen Lawrence, was murdered in London in 1993. No doubt you have heard of him. He has been mentioned over a thousand times in parliament on the floor of both houses. He has been the subject of thirteen (fifteen now) separate Early Day Motions. And yet, the thousand or so British people who have been murdered by foreigners since Stephen's death have rated less than two hundred mentions between them during the same period and just two Early Day Motions were introduced which mentioned any of these dead Brits. In neither of these EDMs was it said that the killer had been non-indigenous. And I, who know this stuff, am supposed to keep quiet about it just because the same creepy elite you harangue so correctly in your email have decided that this knowledge must not be known?

It's funny, whenever someone has a go at me because of the content of my web site, they never attack the factual accuracy, they attack me, as you do, just because I dare to contravene the orthodox, politically correct wisdom of the times. As I said in my last email, if you discover a factual error, tell me about it and I'll take it out. But I don't think you'll bother with that, will you? I think you'd rather just lump me in with the Anglo-Saxon and Jewish elites that have screwed the world ever since the French Revolution, even though a fair-minded assessment of my website would determine, pretty quickly, that these were the very people whose dreadful behaviours I wish to expose.

Why would you do this? Because it's easier that way?

You say this in your email:

"I love the culture and diversity of this city, in fact, I think it is what I like best about it. I can go for dinner… I can go to the Spanish club across the street and dance with someone who can actually move, which is not typical of the boys in my school".

And then you patronisingly say, "I feel very sorry for anyone who can't appreciate these things the way I can."

Wow! Talk about condescension. Talk about being better than. Talk about feeling superior to and not the least bit sorry at all. Half of America "felt sorry" in exactly this kind of "I'm better than you, try it my way " for the people of Iraq not so long back. You add:

"I also feel sorry for people who can't see past the color of someone's skin or heritage. All of my friends are from somewhere else, or have relatives that have come from somewhere else, because that's the way it is here. I can't imagine it any other way. I couldn't imagine my life without difference in culture."

And once again you patronise with a final, "How boring".

This is what you were brought up with. If I had been brought up in America, I hope I would still be brave enough to tell the truths that Big Brother did not want told but perhaps I would "celebrate diversity" rather more than I do, at some level at least. Because that's what I would know, be comfortable with and be used to. Why can you not respect the right of those who were born into a different kind of society to preserve their own culture? Why must a stable, law-abiding and homogeneously easy-going society be forced to evolve into a carbon copy of a decadent, earth-suckingly bloated and self-satisfied New York?

Why do you think you have a God given right to determine that the worlds outside your own evolve in the way that you want them to, with no heed paid to the what the native populations want? Why are you so evangelical about the rights and needs of those who have entered our British society unwanted and unbidden at the behest of the business, political and media elite, when you don't appear to give a damn about those whose lives would be affected so adversely by their alien presence?

If the whole of White West Yorkshire suddenly uprooted itself and went to live in Chad and, once there, demanded that they be housed ahead of the poorest members of the native population, I'm sure you would be the first to cry foul! And yet, you have no sympathy, care or passing thought for the poor, disenfranchised Brit in the land where all his ancestors are buried.

I do, you see. I don't find his desire to live amongst his own kind "boring". I find it normal. It's what people have done the whole world over for tens of thousands of years. But you, in your infinite twenty-year-old American wisdom, know so much better than the rest of us. Which is why you're in Iraq right now, to show the poor, benighted towel-heads the positive advantages of the good ole' American way.

Your nasty dad cares a hell of a lot more for the Iraqi people than the George Bush crew, that's for sure, and I do seem to recall that just about every goddamn Democrat, including your best pal, Kerry, voted for Gulf War II when they had the chance to prevent it happening. And, hey, if a man like me can figure out that the looming war is about to be fought for Oil and Israel and not for WMD, well, hell, the Senators and Congresspersons of the US, with all the inside info at their disposal, could've figured it out as well. And they, probably, did.

As for coke-head Clinton, well I seem to recall him and St. Tony bombing Baghdad flat in June, 1998. But then, over half his administration was Jewish so I guess the smash the Iraqis faction was a bit difficult to face down for eight full years.

As for the smirking chimpanzee in the White House, well, if anyone expected the most intellectually challenged US President in all history to figure out what Tenet (Jewish) and the Neocons (90% Jewish) when they were whispering in his ear, I think they were asking a bit much of daddy's little dimwit.

The Neocons began planning WWIII when Paul Wolfowitz and Scooter Libby (both Jewish) presented the essay, "Defence Policy Guidance" to GB's daddy's Defence Secretary, Dick Cheney, way back in 1992, so there isn't much of an excuse for the "moral majority" not to have done more to stop bad guys before they forced this war upon the world.

Whatever you believe me to be, I am a thousand light years more upstanding and decent than any of these. If the truth I tell doesn't suit you, well, a lot of the truth I tell doesn't suit me either but I tell it anyway. Because it's the truth. You can't pick and choose the truth that suits you, not if you want to be on the side of the angels. You have to acknowledge it all and have the courage to face it even when it makes you feel uncomfortable. Even if the truth is a truth you're not used to.

You may think your lifestyle, your friends and your way are best, but do me a favour, don't sneer at those who would live a different life to you. Their way was never yours, why should they want it to be just because you think it's "boring".

I don't lie, I don't make stuff up and I don't exaggerate. I tell my own people those truths that have always been kept from them. I tell them those truths that, if they had been made aware of them at the time, would have had them making very different decisions to the ones that the machiavellian plans of the elite encouraged them to make.

If you are on the side of those who would carry on with same old spin and propaganda, if you are on the side of those who would have the truths that I tell withheld, simply because they do not fit in with your own personal agenda, well, I guess, as was to be expected, you are more your mother's daughter than mine.

You may well know better than me about your world, but you sure as hell don't know better than me about mine.

In my country, it's my people who are the underdog now. And I've always been one to take the side of the underdog. If your gut feeling is to insist that I shouldn't, that I should accept the fait accomplit, simply because the underdog is not black, Asian, Gypsy, Red Indian, Jewish or any other bloody thing at all as long as it's not white and native to these islands, well, your gut feeling can go hang. I'll be on the side of those I care for, if you don't mind, just as you are on the side of those you care for.

I'll tell you this, sweetheart. If we carry on the way we're going, within a hundred years there'll be no more T…s, J…s, G....s and C… W……s in the family album. The highways and byways of this land will be walked by those whose ancestors are buried elsewhere on the planet. And it's that terrible prospect that ensures that I wilI not be changing my way of thinking and being any time soon.

If you one of those who adhere to the teachings and philosophy of the Havard professor, Noel Ignatiev, and think it would be fine thing for the white race to breed itself out of existence, then such a prospect, as that I have just described, would hold no terrors for you.

If you do feel this way, let me know and it will be small talk and chit-chat from here on in.

Love,

Your father.

So, a rather shameful demonstration of "tough love" from a sanctimonious and insensitive absent dad.

After which, having just found each other for the first time in nearly two decades I, deservedly, didn't get another email for the next seven weeks.

When it arrived there was just one sentence asking for her grandmother's telephone number.

We don't talk politics any more and she has softened considerably in the meantime, thank God.

I remain hopeful, touch wood, for her and whatever it is that she will turn out to be.