1)What do you think are the common and different causes and dynamics of the Civil Revolts in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Syria? All episodes of protests have a political implications,(вовлечения) especially in authoriatorian and semi-autoritorian countries. The “Arab Sping” has widely belived to have been instigated(давать толчёк) by dissatisfaction with the rule of local governmets . Numerous factors (causes) have lead to the protests, including issue such as dictatorship or absolute monarchy , human rights violation, political corruption, economic decline (inflation), kleptocracy, sectarianism, unemployment, extreme poverty and a number of a demographic structural factors, high prices of basic goods, lack of freedom of speech and trigger. Military played a huge role almost in all the countries, aljazeera and other social networks as well. Tunisia and Egypt, the first to witness the major uprisings, differ from Lybia and Syria. Let’s now explain the different causes and dynamics of the Civil Revolts. Tunisia was the first country who set an example following the self-immolation(самосожжение) of M.Bouazizi. The demonstrations here were preceded by high unemployment, food inflation, corruption, lack of freedom of speech and other forms of political and poor living conditions. The Egypt was inspired by the uprising in Tunisia, hence the causes were almost the same. The most important event was a massive general strike led by networks of young activists and worker groups that took place on april 6. In both, Tunisia and Egypt the revolters were young, educated, liberal people. Workers and young activists in Egypt have viewed political opposition as untrustworthy and obsolete organizations. In Egypt the revolts were situated in urban and cosmopolitan areas, were much more organized than in Tunisia, society relatively more prepared. Also military has a huge influence in Egypt, but not in Tunisia. The essential demands were: socioeconomic and political, eliminating corruption, political freedom,affordable housing, job creation, leadership maximizing youth potential. Egyptians were also not satisfied with the efforts to preserve the environment. In Lybia the opposition controlled most of Benghazi, the country’s second largest city. The government dispatched (send) elite troops and militia in an attempt to recruit it,(завербовать) but they were repelled (отбивать). Then protests had spread to the capital Tripoli. In the august, anti-Gaddafi fightres captured Tripoli, scattering(разрушить) Gaddafi’s government and making the end of the 42 years of power, which prohibited private ownership and retail trade, banned(prohibit) a free press, subverted (свергать) the military leadership. Lybia result to be country who faces big challenges in comparison to Tunisia and Egypt. 20.11. 2011 Gaddafi was killed, NATO intervention. The leadership passed to a cobbled-together(приготовить на скорую руку) comprising (include) both jihadists and bureaucrats. Protest in Syria started on 26.01.2011, when the police officer assulted a man in public. The man was arrested right after the assault. Protesters called for the freedom of the arrested man. The Syrian security forces arrested about 15 children for writing slogans against the government. Soon protesters erupted (вылиться,перерасти)over the arrest and abuse of the children, people started to protest against the Baathist regime, which has been ruling Syria since 1963. Hence, Syria revolution was more slower, started step by step. There is still no big changes in here, protests grid on and so does the regime. Thus, the causes of the revolts are similar in Syria and Lybia, those revolts resulted to be more violent, while in Egypt and Tusia they were more peaceful . Also the revolters were not similar groups of people, it was not a class but united group, ethnical and religious. In Egypt the change is superficial- Mubarak is gone, but the military chieftains (глава разбойников) who have succeded...

YOU MAY ALSO FIND THESE DOCUMENTS HELPFUL

...the MiddleEast
Questions 6-11
6. How did the U.S. respond to the Soviet influences/ threats in Greece and Turkey, and why? What is the Truman Doctrine? 62-64.
United Stated responded to the Soviet influences in Greece and Turkey by issuing a new policy called Truman Doctrine. This doctrine was issued by US president Harry Truman in 1947 to assist Greece and Turkey economically as well as militarily in order to prevent them from falling into Soviet control.
7. Which countries were more dependent on Middle Eastern oil than the others? Was the Soviet Union dependent on the MiddleEast? To what extent did oil play a role in the Cold War competition of the Soviet Union and the U.S. in the MiddleEast? What was the Soviet Union’s motivation for becoming involved in the MiddleEast?
United States was more depended on Middle Eastern oil than USSR as the United States was controlling 42% of Middle Eastern oil by 1940s. It cannot be said that Soviet Union depended on Middle Eastern oil since Russia already had enough and more oilfields at home that could feed its national interests.
It is difficult to say that oil played a major role as it actually did not. Oil was only something to be used in the discussions or excuses supporting more-or less undemocratic regimes. Also, as mentioned earlier, Russia had...

...Kennedy during his inaugural address on January 20, 1961 are the personification of the agenda towards foreign relations for the United States of America and her Western allies. As champions of peace and servants of liberty, the nations of the ideological West have swiftly rationalized the mobilization of peacekeepers, implementation economic trade sanctions, and forcefully removed government regimes that were deemed violators of human rights, tyrannical, and/or agitators of world peace. Yet, as the world becomes a smaller place due to enhanced communication, lowered trade barriers, and mass media; nation-states tend to plan their actions more tactfully than before in the 1960s to maintain their global reputations and popular sovereignty. Takastand`s problematic relations internally and externally symbolize the importance of efficient security, popular sovereignty, political liberties, and human rights functioning completely to acquire a civilized state. By chronicling statehood decisions of the following nation-states; France, Great Britain, Russia, and China, the purpose of this paper will be to highlight political and social factors associated with the Takastand crisis. Additionally, it is imperative to analyze the governmental frameworks of these countries as the influential basis behind responses that impact surrounding communities and the internationalrelations process.
This brings the discussion to the...

...CHAPTER II
CONTENT
InternationalRelation between Indonesia, MiddleEast and OIC
Indonesia, Middle-East, and OIC
The MiddleEast is a region that spans southwestern Asia and Northeastern Africa. It has no clear boundaries, often used as synonym of Near East. The history of the MiddleEast dates back to ancient times, and throughout its history the MiddleEast has been a major centre of world affairs. The MiddleEast is also the historical origin of the three of the world’s major monotheistic religions, which are Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Many countries of which located around the Persian Gulf have large quantities of crude oil.
Middle Eastern economies range from nations being very poor (such as Gaza and Yemen) to extremely wealthy nations (such as UAE and Saudi Arabia). Overall, as of 2007, according to the CIA World Factbook, all nations in the MiddleEast are maintaining a positive rate of growth. According to the International Monetary Fund's World Economic Outlook Database of April 2008, the three largest Middle Eastern economies in 2007 were Turkey ($ 663,419,000,000), Saudi Arabia ($ 376,029,000,000) and Iran ($ 294,089,000,000), in terms of Nominal GDP. Turkey ($...

...Through Focussing On A Specific International Issue, Explain How Ethical Issues Are Significant For InternationalRelations In The MiddleEast
The Arab Israeli conflict is “one of the most bitter, protracted and intractable conflicts of modern times” (Atack, 2005), being a dominant theme of IR in the MiddleEast it posses a range of core principal levels that contain ethical issues used as reasons to justify positions from both sides of the conflict. The conflict in essence is a clash “Between Jewish and Palestinians national movements over the land of Palestine” (Fawcett, 2005) the searches for settlement is complicated by inter Arab relations, Western Nations, and more recently inter Palestinian fragmentation. The issue of Hamas being an illegal terrorist entity has been a source failure for many peace initiatives as well as a reason for escalation to the use of force within that conflict ever since they formed in 1989. With “Israel, the EU, the US and their allies” (Akhtar, 2008) deeming Hamas as a terrorist entity what this essay will attempt to analyse is; can Hamas’s position be justified by using the principles of the ‘Just war theory’, the essay will analyse the first section of the theory concerned with justice in going to war, and see whether Hamas as a non state actor can satisfy its criterion and what effects it has on international...

...
MiddleEast
Part 1
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an ongoing conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. Many issues still remain today between the two groups. These include mutual recognition, borders, security, water rights, control of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, Palestinian freedom of movement and legalities concerning refugees. The violence resulting from the conflict has brought international actions, as well as security and human rights concerns, within, between both sides, and internationally. Many solutions have been attempted, but none successful.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict goes back to 1947 when the United Nations voted to separate the British mandate of Palestine into two. Arab leaders refused to accept the decision. When Israel declared its independence in May 1948, surrounding Arab countries attacked to destroy the land. By the end of war in 1949, lots of Palestinians lost their homes and property. While many people left, a larger number of Jews were forced to leave all Arab countries in the MiddleEast. The Palestinians then took the Gaza Strip under their security ruled by Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon. Another conflict started in 1967. Israeli troops took control of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip that were part of the “Occupied Territories,” according to the Palestinians. Less than one million Palestinians remained in the West Bank after a large number moved to...

...
IKEA in the MiddleEast
May 2013
Table of contents
Executive summary
Introduction
Purpose
Scope
Method
Findings
IKEA’s Marketing Strategy
Reforms
Discussion / Conclusion
IKEA and the Future of the MiddleEast
References
Executive summary
In 1995, IKEA opened their first store in the MiddleEast in what was called the retail hub Deira. This came at a time when the UAE was at the start of their development plans for Dubai. In terms of economics the UAE was on the way up in the building of the world famous Palm Jumeirah making the country an attractive investment for the group. The success of IKEA in the MiddleEast hinged on the way in which they understood the marketplace i.e. brand protection, the regions trade regulations and the stability of government. As an example IKEA did fail when they arrived in the Japanese marketplace by not understanding the trade policies and in Russia by not having clear understanding of the cultural differences.
Introduction
Purpose
The purpose of this report is to prepare understand the concepts and techniques used by IKEA to enter the emerging markets of the MiddleEast.
Scope
While investigating IKEA’s concepts and techniques of entering the MiddleEast market this paper will relate findings to methods and research studied.
Method
The...

...﻿
INTERNATIONALRELATION AND ITS IMPACT TO THE SOCIATY
The renewed violence in the Nuba Mountains, Sudan. If it were to continue that way without constructive dialogue between the government of Sudan and the rebels, the Nuba Mountains people will be wiped out in the next thirty years!, it will not be because of diseases or the end of the world in Sudan, but because of the Sudan government is policy; blocking of the humanitarian help to reach the people in Nuba Mountains, the rebels in South Sudan making the accessibility in the area more difficult and international communities reluctant to act.
In Nuba Mountains, where hundreds of antinonov bombs are dropped every day, and the international communities are doing nothing to abort the atrocious act committed in Sudan, in the Nuba Mountains antinonov shrapnel comes without warning and thousands upon thousands are dying each day from starvation and thousands of the people are being displaced from their ancestral homes caused by man-made disaster on his own citizens and the way how international system operates, I need to study and understand how international community work.
Studying Internationalrelation will equip me with skill and knowledge relevant to the policy-making in the government agencies, and nongovernmental organization and international...

...﻿Realism, the Blueprint of InternationalRelations
From the Clinton administration’s reluctance to acknowledge genocide in Rwanda to the United States’ unwillingness to intervene in Darfur, the evidence overwhelmingly shows that many states in the world conform to the realist ideology. Scott defines realism as a major theoretical approach to internationalrelations emphasizing the competitive, conflict-ridden pursuit of power and security among states in world politics (Scott 62). Realist believe that states are in constant competition for power and that the balance of power is only brief, as states take actions to gain more power. The realism philosophy places great emphasis on relative gains of power and the power itself derives from natural, economic, and military sources.
Scott states that the absence of central government to establish order and wield power and authority establishes a fundamentally Hobbesian world in which the main players of world politics must rely on themselves and themselves alone to protect their interest and accomplish their goals (Scott 64) This excerpt explains the inconsistencies in the US foreign policy and its contradicting decisions to intervene in some case and not in other. For example, nearly 2 million people died in Darfur as a result of conflict between the Muslim government and rebels in the south of the country. However, the U.S. only assisted from a distance by sending...