Devolving welfare ‘key to maintaining the Union’

Protesters march against the bedroom tax in Glasgow. Picture: Robert Perry

TOM PETERKIN

A RADICAL transfer of welfare to Holyrood is “vital” to maintaining the United Kingdom, according to a new report that recommends sweeping new powers be handed to Scotland.

Control of housing benefit, attendance allowance for the disabled, the child care element of working tax credit and the work programme should be part of a devolved welfare package to be put on the table in the event of a No vote.

A detailed model of welfare devolution has been produced by the Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR), an academic think-tank that is influential in Labour circles and whose findings have been fed into the party’s Devolution Commission.

This month Labour will publish the conclusions of its Commission, which will play a key part in determining what extra powers for Holyrood will be on offer if Scotland rejects independence.

The IPPR paper, to be published tomorrow, argues that significant devolution of welfare would enhance Scotland’s economic performance and improve social outcomes for the disadvantaged.

However, the paper “Devo More and Welfare” also argues that some key benefits must remain under Westminster control, because managing them on a UK-wide basis reduces risk and enables the redistribution of wealth.

“There are powerful reasons for devolving welfare, both as a way of improving social and economic outcomes and as a way of reinforcing the Union,” said Guy Lodge, IPPR associate director and author of the paper with Alan Trench, professor of politics at Ulster University.

“The UK government provides a strong backbone for the social union – pooling risk and allowing for redistribution – while the devolved governments are best placed to respond to local needs and pressures.”

He added: “Welfare devolution would improve policy without undermining the fundamental level of shared UK-wide social citizenship. This is a win/win outcome, while Scotland going it alone would inhibit ability to provide a stable and resilient form of social protection.”

Among the measures that Labour is expected to take on board from the paper is the IPPR’s proposal to devolve housing benefit, which is worth around £1.7 billion a year in Scotland.

From a political perspective, such a move would enable a future Scottish Government to ensure that David Cameron’s bedroom tax, or similarly unpopular taxes, would not come north of the Border.

But the IPPR also makes the point that giving Holyrood housing benefit would give Scottish administrations the power to take action to divert finances from subsidising private landlords into building more homes and creating jobs.

A recurring theme of the paper is that the introduction of a Scottish Parliament 1999 has already seen large parts of the welfare state devolved to Scotland – notably the NHS and social services.

Therefore, the paper argues, it makes sense for benefits that have a close relationship with the already devolved sections of the welfare state to be transferred.

The UK government’s Work Programme, for example, which provides personalised support for those claiming unemployment benefit, could be transferred to Holyrood.

Retaining the Work Programme at Westminster is “problematic”, because it requires working with devolved agencies such as education and skills institutions, mental health services and local authorities. A similar argument is deployed when it comes to attendance allowance.

The paper said that the SNP’s claim that independence is the way to transform childcare in Scotland was “spurious”. But it said more could be done in that direction if the childcare element of working tax credit was devolved.

If welfare devolution was accompanied by greater tax devolution the financial benefits that would result from getting more women back to work would flow to the Scottish Government rather than the Treasury. The paper also suggests that Holyrood could be given a general power to supplement UK welfare levels.

That approach would enable devolved governments to use additional cash payments – funded from devolved budgets – to deliver social policy while maintaining the social union across the UK.

Making the argument that significant welfare devolution is “vital” to maintaining the Union, the paper argues that more powers would provide an incentive for Holyrood to reduce the welfare burden and would also reduce the politics of “blame” that has seen the SNP government attack Westminster for unpopular policies.

Fundamental to the maintenance of the Union would be continuing to run the state old-age pension, Jobseekers Allowance and the Employment Support Allowance on a UK-wide basis. The IPPR argues that these larger benefits are driven by the performance of the economy.

Keeping these benefits under Westminster control would “pool the risk” for funding these benefits, because the UK government has a wider tax base than the devolved governments and has a greater borrowing capacity.

Labour is expected to unveil the conclusions of its Devolution Commission at its spring conference in Perth, which begins on 21 March.

Last night a Labour Party spokesman said: “We believe the people of Scotland want to see devolution strengthened and we look forward to unveiling our proposals later this month.”

Last night, a spokesman for Nicola Sturgeon, the Deputy First Minister, said: “We look forward to reading this paper but at the end of the day there is no guarantee from any of the anti-independence parties of any more powers in the event of a No vote. None of them have even committed to passing welfare powers to the Scottish Parliament with the Scottish Labour party’s Labour welfare spokesperson opposing a welfare system for Scotland’s needs.”

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice.
If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the
Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the IPSO by
clicking here.

The Scotsman provides news, events and sport features from the Edinburgh area. For the best up to date information relating to Edinburgh and the surrounding areas visit us at The Scotsman regularly or bookmark this page.

For you to enjoy all the features of this website The Scotsman requires permission to use cookies.

Find Out More ▼

What is a Cookie?

What is a Flash Cookie?

Can I opt out of receiving Cookies?

About our Cookies

Cookies are small data files which are sent to your browser (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome etc) from a website you visit. They are stored on your electronic device.

This is a type of cookie which is collected by Adobe Flash media player (it is also called a Local Shared Object) - a piece of software you may already have on your electronic device to help you watch online videos and listen to podcasts.

Yes there are a number of options available, you can set your browser either to reject all cookies, to allow only "trusted" sites to set them, or to only accept them from the site you are currently on.

However, please note - if you block/delete all cookies, some features of our websites, such as remembering your login details, or the site branding for your local newspaper may not function as a result.

The types of cookies we, our ad network and technology partners use are listed below:

Revenue Science ►

A tool used by some of our advertisers to target adverts to you based on pages you have visited in the past. To opt out of this type of targeting you can visit the 'Your Online Choices' website by clicking here.

Google Ads ►

Our sites contain advertising from Google; these use cookies to ensure you get adverts relevant to you. You can tailor the type of ads you receive by visiting here or to opt out of this type of targeting you can visit the 'Your Online Choices' website by clicking here.

Digital Analytics ►

This is used to help us identify unique visitors to our websites. This data is anonymous and we cannot use this to uniquely identify individuals and their usage of the sites.

Dart for Publishers ►

This comes from our ad serving technology and is used to track how many times you have seen a particular ad on our sites, so that you don't just see one advert but an even spread. This information is not used by us for any other type of audience recording or monitoring.

ComScore ►

ComScore monitor and externally verify our site traffic data for use within the advertising industry. Any data collected is anonymous statistical data and cannot be traced back to an individual.

Local Targeting ►

Our Classified websites (Photos, Motors, Jobs and Property Today) use cookies to ensure you get the correct local newspaper branding and content when you visit them. These cookies store no personally identifiable information.

Grapeshot ►

We use Grapeshot as a contextual targeting technology, allowing us to create custom groups of stories outside out of our usual site navigation. Grapeshot stores the categories of story you have been exposed to. Their privacy policy and opt out option can be accessed here.

Subscriptions Online ►

Our partner for Newspaper subscriptions online stores data from the forms you complete in these to increase the usability of the site and enhance user experience.

Add This ►

Add This provides the social networking widget found in many of our pages. This widget gives you the tools to bookmark our websites, blog, share, tweet and email our content to a friend.