June 2017
Volume 55 Number 3
Article #v55-3iw4
Ideas at Work

June 2017 // Volume 55 // Number 3 // Ideas at Work // v55-3iw4

The Great Lakes School of Turfgrass Science: A Nine-State Online Collaboration to Improve the Turfgrass Short Course

Abstract
Increasing costs and decreasing numbers of university Extension faculty have made it difficult to provide quality turfgrass short course education. In response, faculty from nine institutions collaborated to develop the Great Lakes School of Turfgrass Science. This 12-week online course provides students with unique learning experiences through a combination of assigned readings, quizzes, lectures, and live instructor discussion. Student attendance increased and costs decreased relative to traditional in-person short courses. Additionally, student feedback has been overwhelmingly positive. These results demonstrate that online courses such as this can provide an effective and flexible source of knowledge that meets the busy schedules of students and instructors.

Introduction

For nearly 100 years, turfgrass short courses have offered highly applicable educational and advancement opportunities for turfgrass managers outside formal college or university settings. Lawrence Dickinson offered the first turfgrass short course in
1925 at the Massachusetts State Agricultural School, and similar 8- to 12-week courses were initiated in subsequent years at Penn State and Rutgers University (Beard, Beard, & Beard, 2014). Many university programs across the country currently
offer a turfgrass short course, but in recent years many institutions across multiple states have merged to provide joint short courses. Illinois and Indiana were the first states to merge, in 1994, and numerous other states initiated collaborations
in following years (Patton, Trenholm, & Waltz, 2013). Declining enrollment and fewer turfgrass science faculty have been the primary drivers behind the merging of short courses, and the mergers allow the larger numbers of participating short course
faculty to offer more specialized instruction tailored to their particular strengths.

The University of Wisconsin–Madison and the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities merged their short courses in 2003 and alternated the host site between the two states. The course averaged 25 to 30 students each year until 2014, when unusually
low enrollment coupled with increasing course costs drove discussion about developing a new course format. Those discussions eventually included turfgrass faculty from surrounding states, and the result was a nine-state online collaboration called
the Great Lakes School of Turfgrass Science that debuted in 2014.

Great Lakes School of Turfgrass Science

The 12-week online course occurs once per week for 2 hr. Each week a topic is taught by an expert in a particular area (Table 1). This lead instructor presents a live lecture to the class via Google Hangouts, which is embedded in a Moodle class management
website. Two or three additional instructors participate in the lecture, asking questions and initiating discussion (Figure 1). Typically, following the main presentation, the course administrator and other instructors engage in a 15- to 20-min roundtable
discussion on the topic(s) covered. These discussions are not scripted and tend to hit on the latest trends or controversial subjects that were not presented in the main lecture. Over 90% of the students surveyed indicated that these discussions were
helpful to their understanding of the associated topics (Table 2).

Table 1. Participating Institutions and Faculty and Topic Areas for the 2014 Great Lakes School of Turfgrass Science

Institution

Faculty member

Title

Area of expertise

University of Minnesota

Sam Bauer

Assistant Extension professor

Course administration and general turfgrass familiarity

University of Minnesota

Brian Horgan

Professor

Selection and establishment

University of Wisconsin

Doug Soldat

Associate professor

Soil science

University of Wisconsin

Chris Williamson

Professor

Entomology

University of Wisconsin

Paul Koch

Assistant professor

Plant pathology

Texas A&M University

Dave Chalmers

Professor emeritus

Mowing and cultural practices

Michigan State University

Kevin Frank

Associate professor

Nutrition and fertility programming

Ohio State University

David Gardner

Associate professor

Turf species identification

Chicago District Golf Association

Ed Nangle

Director of turf programs

Specialty product usage

Purdue University

Aaron Patton

Associate professor

Weed science

University of Nebraska

Zac Reicher

Professor

Mathematics and calibration

Cornell University

Frank Rossi

Associate professor

Abiotic stresses

Figure 1. Screenshot of Google Hangouts Feed from Great Lakes School of Turfgrass Science Showing Main Lecture in Primary Window and Assisting Presenters in Smaller Windows

Table 2. Responses to Survey Administered at Conclusions of 2014 and 2015 Great Lakes School of Turfgrass Science Courses (n = 66)

Item

Strongly disagree (%)

Disagree (%)

Somewhat disagree (%)

Neither agree nor disagree (%)

Somewhat agree (%)

Agree (%)

Strongly agree (%)

I would not have been able to take a turf management course without the flexibility provided by the online format.

0

0

1.5

3.0

6.0

21.2

68.2

I believe I learned as much from the online format as I would have in person.

The online platform provides a unique way for Extension professionals leading the class to engage the students (Gharis, Bardon, Evans, Hubbard, & Taylor, 2014). Students can sign on and watch the Hangout live and ask questions through a live chat
with the course administrator, or they can watch the recorded version at their convenience and ask questions of the instructors via Moodle forums. Students are assigned relevant readings prior to each live session and take a quiz developed by
that week's instructor(s). To receive a certificate of completion, a student must satisfactorily complete 10 of the 12 quizzes. To date, approximately 50% of the students complete the course in 12 weeks, 35% take longer than 12 weeks, and 15%
do not complete the required number of quizzes.

The benefits of using this format for both the students and the instructors have been numerous. First, the nine-state footprint increased overall student enrollment threefold relative to the best years of the Wisconsin–Minnesota short course
and allowed students from varied geographic areas and segments of the turfgrass industry to participate (Table 3). Second, the flexibility of the online class was critical for both students and instructors. Nearly 90% of students surveyed in 2014
and 2015 agreed that they would not have been able to take a turfgrass science class without the flexibility the online course offered (see Table 2), and each instructor only needed to prepare for one lecture and assist in two others. Third, the
class was effective in transferring knowledge to the students and, likely, in changing their behaviors (Table 4). Students reported their knowledge of pertinent topics before and after taking the class by using a 4-point scale (1 = poor knowledge,
4 = excellent knowledge; data not shown). Self-assessed student knowledge on a variety of topics covered in the class increased from an average of 1.9 prior to the start of the class to 3.1 at the conclusion of the class (data not shown).
Fourth, enrollment costs were lower for students relative to the in-person course because there were no facility rental, food, and printing expenses to be covered. Moreover, students did not need to budget for hotel or travel costs and were not
away from work or family for an extended period of time.

Table 3. Student Enrollment in the Great Lakes School of Turfgrass Science in 2014 and 2015

Table 4. Respondents' Willingness to Adopt Various Practices Discussed During Class According to Survey Administered Immediately Following Course Completion in 2014 (n = 29) and Again Six Months Later (n = 17)

Area of focus

Definitely will not

Probably will not

Undecided

Probably will

Definitely will

Already adopted

End (%)

6 mo. (%)

End (%)

6 mo. (%)

End (%)

6 mo. (%)

End (%)

6 mo. (%)

End (%)

6 mo. (%)

End (%)

6 mo. (%)

Methods/practices for greater economic efficiency

0

0

0

0

3.5

0

6.9

11.7

82.8

70.6

6.9

17.6

New or improved practices for ecologically sensitive management

0

0

0

6.0

0

0

27.6

17.6

62.0

58.8

10.3

17.6

New or improved practices that will enhance clientele/supervisor's acceptance and/or appreciation

0

0

0

0

0

0

10.3

11.7

79.3

52.9

10.3

35.3

New practices learned or improvement of existing practices

0

0

0

0

0

0

10.3

11.7

82.8

23.5

6.9

64.7

There were also drawbacks associated with the transition to a completely online course. Foremost was the resistance to online learning by some students in the course. As nontraditional students, many had never taken part in an online educational seminar
and may not have known what to expect. There was also a technology gap for both faculty and students that led to technical difficulties, though it should be noted that the incidence of these was much lower in 2015 than in 2014. Despite these minor
problems, the class to date has been considered an unqualified success by nearly all the instructors and students who have participated.

The Future of Turfgrass Short Course Education

The use of short courses will remain a staple of turfgrass management for years to come, and their importance in educating the industry may even increase in the future. Enrollment in traditional 4-year university turf programs has declined at most
institutions for a variety of reasons (Richman, 2014), and workers entering the turfgrass industry will likely require continuing education from nontraditional sources (Patton & Reicher, 2011). Short courses, and, in particular, interactive
and online short courses such as the Great Lakes School of Turfgrass Science, may be particularly attractive to these potential students. Though lack of support and accreditation from universities may hamper online short course growth, benefits
such as flexibility and the opportunity for interaction between students and experts make online courses such as the Great Lakes School of Turfgrass Science increasingly valuable tools in educating the turfgrass industry workforce.

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our gratitude to the Minnesota Golf Course Superintendents Association, Minnesota Turf and Grounds Foundation, Midwest Association of Golf Course Superintendents, Midwest Regional Turf Foundation, Wisconsin Turfgrass Association,
and Turf Republic for partnering with us and promoting participation in the Great Lakes School of Turfgrass Science. We also wish to thank the course co-instructors for their hard work, which has made the course a success.

The Journal of Extension

The Journal of Extension (JOE) is the official refereed journal for Extension professionals. JOE expands and updates the research and knowledge base for Extension professionals and other adult educators to improve their effectiveness. In addition, JOE serves as a forum for emerging and contemporary issues affecting Extension education.