West and East exist as antithetical. But the East actually exists only as an external look that the western civilization uses in order to define better its identity of "world - civilization". At the end of the last millennium it was found that it is not so easy to write documents of political, social and economic rights again, without external legitimacy in a period when the political and the religious events become immoderately complicated and when "high values lose their worth". Therefore, nowadays how can we rule the web of politics, economy, right and religion?
The following essay traces a path inside the segmented web of the political philosophy, the political theology and the history of philosophy, without any pretensions to exhaust the topic. Instead it tries to give further issues to the debate in progress introducing different elements to those themes that have been settled in the usual descriptions of the "changes of modernity".

West and East exist as antithetical. But the East actually exists only as an external look that the western civilization uses in order to define better its identity of "world - civilization". At the end of the last millennium it was found that it is not so easy to write documents of political, social and economic rights again, without external legitimacy in a period when the political and the religious events become immoderately complicated and when "high values lose their worth". Therefore, nowadays how can we rule the web of politics, economy, right and religion?
The following essay traces a path inside the segmented web of the political philosophy, the political theology and the history of philosophy, without any pretensions to exhaust the topic. Instead it tries to give further issues to the debate in progress introducing different elements to those themes that have been settled in the usual descriptions of the "changes of modernity".