nytmare:Elegy: I don't believe it. There is no way this could have happened in the gun free utopia of Chicago. There are laws against this sort of thing.

So now he gets to be charged with two crimes instead of one.

I'm sure if we can just charge people with enough crimes, the weight of the parchment will collapse time and space and actually prevent crimes, despite 1000's of years of direct evidence to the contrary.

For the idiot above that said "grab them",,,,hahahahaha!!! He would have just stabbed her or beat her to death then. Or maybe a little strangulation. C'mon, live in the real world, shyt will happen no matter if there are guns or not. Now go back and hide under your blanky and wait for the government to make it all better.

stuffy: To the Gun Control Freaks. This guy was a "F.E.L.O.N." and was not suppose to have a gun in the first place.So STFUI don't understand your position at all. I like how you proclaim it loudly, albeit sans logic. But I find humor in loud dipshiats. +1

This has to be asked... Hey subby, do you shills get paid to submit this shait to Fark and other sites or what?I've seen lots of stories about so called "Mass Shootings" involving less than 5 people (an average 4 hour period in Liberal controlled Chicago) and it's really getting old. Hey Mods, how about you green light some stories about all the times an average citizen uses a firearm to stop or prevent a crime, oh, I forgot, that doesn't get ad clicks.Citation: http://www.americanrifleman.org/bloglist.aspx?id=21

Oh relax, I wasn't serious. If I were though, I'd want it to be done full-on fascist. Storm the felon's house and other property and search every fiber, taking any firearms. Deliver notice to any immediate family, neighbors, and friends that if they provide said felon with a gun, the household will serve twice the sentence the criminal serves the next time he's arrested. Have a black list registry with gun stores and have the sellers under the same condition as family members. Do random, any hour of the day searches from there on. If you're going to do it, go balls out.

ArmednHammered:This has to be asked... Hey subby, do you shills get paid to submit this shait to Fark and other sites or what?I've seen lots of stories about so called "Mass Shootings" involving less than 5 people (an average 4 hour period in Liberal controlled Chicago) and it's really getting old. Hey Mods, how about you green light some stories about all the times an average citizen uses a firearm to stop or prevent a crime, oh, I forgot, that doesn't get ad clicks.Citation: http://www.americanrifleman.org/bloglist.aspx?id=21

Being a shill would've been submitting with a headline that reads "Guy shoots random guy because he couldn't see his kid on Father's Day. If only someone had grabbed his gun from him" or something to that effect. The actual headline is not suitable for Fark though, because it is both not humorous AND on topic. One or the other is fine, but not both.

I agree with you:For the idiot above that said "grab them",,,,hahahahaha!!! He would have just stabbed her or beat her to death then. Or maybe a little strangulation. C'mon, live in the real world, shyt will happen no matter if there are guns or not. Now go back and hide under your blanky and wait for the government to make it all better.

If guns aren't more effective for combat than knives or fighting unarmed, why do you care if they're accessible?

ArmednHammered:This has to be asked... Hey subby, do you shills get paid to submit this shait to Fark and other sites or what?I've seen lots of stories about so called "Mass Shootings" involving less than 5 people (an average 4 hour period in Liberal controlled Chicago) and it's really getting old. Hey Mods, how about you green light some stories about all the times an average citizen uses a firearm to stop or prevent a crime, oh, I forgot, that doesn't get ad clicks.Citation: http://www.americanrifleman.org/bloglist.aspx?id=21

Your name suggests you are the last person on Earth who should actually speak on this issue, let alone own a gun.