"A Suspicious Character," from The Illustrated London News for 13 October 1888 carrying the overall caption, "With the Vigilance Committee in the East End".

Background information

Birth name: Unknown
Alias(es): Unknown
Died: Unknown

Cause of death: Unknown
Killings
Number of victims: 5+ ?
Country: United Kingdom
Date apprehended: Not apprehended
Jack the Ripper is an alias given to an unidentified serial killer active in the largely impoverished Whitechapel area and adjacent districts of London, England, in the autumn of 1888. The name originated in a letter sent to the London Central News Agency by someone claiming to be the murderer.

The victims were women allegedly earning income as prostitutes, who were killed in public or semi-public places at night or in the early morning. Each victim's throat was cut, after which her body was mutilated. Theories suggest that the victims first were strangled, in order to silence them, which may explain the reported lack of blood at the crime scenes. The removal of internal organs from three of the victims led some officials at the time of the murders to propose that the killer possessed anatomical or surgical knowledge.

Newspapers, whose circulation had been growing during this era, bestowed widespread and enduring notoriety on the killer because of the attacks' savagery and the police's failure to capture the murderer (they sometimes missed him at the crime scenes by mere minutes).

Because the killer's identity has never been confirmed, the legends surrounding the murders have become a combination of genuine historical research, folklore, and pseudohistory. Many authors, historians, and amateur detectives have proposed theories about the identity of the killer and his victims.

.............................................
Wow...................
Well i cant say i support him but killing prostitutes kinda makes me happy since they dont deserve to live but hey he doesnt deserver to take thier lives

excuse me lonareas? they dont deserve to live? are you fucking serious? they're humans for christ sake. so what if they are prostitutes? they're just earing a living through sex. since they chose that path, they will overcome it. so stop your selfish act and saying they dont deserve to live.

i DONT CARE if u think they dont deserve it cause they selling thier body for sex ???? lowest people so thats why i wrote this

"A Suspicious Character," from The Illustrated London News for 13 October 1888 carrying the overall caption, "With the Vigilance Committee in the East End".

Background information

Birth name: Unknown
Alias(es): Unknown
Died: Unknown

Cause of death: Unknown
Killings
Number of victims: 5+ ?
Country: United Kingdom
Date apprehended: Not apprehended
Jack the Ripper is an alias given to an unidentified serial killer active in the largely impoverished Whitechapel area and adjacent districts of London, England, in the autumn of 1888. The name originated in a letter sent to the London Central News Agency by someone claiming to be the murderer.

The victims were women allegedly earning income as prostitutes, who were killed in public or semi-public places at night or in the early morning. Each victim's throat was cut, after which her body was mutilated. Theories suggest that the victims first were strangled, in order to silence them, which may explain the reported lack of blood at the crime scenes. The removal of internal organs from three of the victims led some officials at the time of the murders to propose that the killer possessed anatomical or surgical knowledge.

Newspapers, whose circulation had been growing during this era, bestowed widespread and enduring notoriety on the killer because of the attacks' savagery and the police's failure to capture the murderer (they sometimes missed him at the crime scenes by mere minutes).

Because the killer's identity has never been confirmed, the legends surrounding the murders have become a combination of genuine historical research, folklore, and pseudohistory. Many authors, historians, and amateur detectives have proposed theories about the identity of the killer and his victims.

.............................................
Wow...................
Well i cant say i support him but killing prostitutes kinda makes me happy since they dont deserve to live but hey he doesnt deserver to take thier lives

excuse me lonareas? they dont deserve to live? are you fucking serious? they're humans for christ sake. so what if they are prostitutes? they're just earing a living through sex. since they chose that path, they will overcome it. so stop your selfish act and saying they dont deserve to live.

i DONT CARE if u think they dont deserve it cause they selling thier body for sex ???? lowest people so thats why i wrote this

you know - hmmm that time people have no choice - living is hard - selling their body is their means to live and eat... they dont deserve to die... they deserve some good things...

every people - prostitutes they are - deserve every single droplet of light (life)...
i think <Cross-7> is right to kinda lecture you for that one...
for me, those women aren't low or something - decent jobs are hard to find and well... hmm i think you still need to broaden your mind...
they're human and let's respect every people... ^^

"A Suspicious Character," from The Illustrated London News for 13 October 1888 carrying the overall caption, "With the Vigilance Committee in the East End".

Background information

Birth name: Unknown
Alias(es): Unknown
Died: Unknown

Cause of death: Unknown
Killings
Number of victims: 5+ ?
Country: United Kingdom
Date apprehended: Not apprehended
Jack the Ripper is an alias given to an unidentified serial killer active in the largely impoverished Whitechapel area and adjacent districts of London, England, in the autumn of 1888. The name originated in a letter sent to the London Central News Agency by someone claiming to be the murderer.

The victims were women allegedly earning income as prostitutes, who were killed in public or semi-public places at night or in the early morning. Each victim's throat was cut, after which her body was mutilated. Theories suggest that the victims first were strangled, in order to silence them, which may explain the reported lack of blood at the crime scenes. The removal of internal organs from three of the victims led some officials at the time of the murders to propose that the killer possessed anatomical or surgical knowledge.

Newspapers, whose circulation had been growing during this era, bestowed widespread and enduring notoriety on the killer because of the attacks' savagery and the police's failure to capture the murderer (they sometimes missed him at the crime scenes by mere minutes).

Because the killer's identity has never been confirmed, the legends surrounding the murders have become a combination of genuine historical research, folklore, and pseudohistory. Many authors, historians, and amateur detectives have proposed theories about the identity of the killer and his victims.

.............................................
Wow...................
Well i cant say i support him but killing prostitutes kinda makes me happy since they dont deserve to live but hey he doesnt deserver to take thier lives

excuse me lonareas? they dont deserve to live? are you fucking serious? they're humans for christ sake. so what if they are prostitutes? they're just earing a living through sex. since they chose that path, they will overcome it. so stop your selfish act and saying they dont deserve to live.

i DONT CARE if u think they dont deserve it cause they selling thier body for sex ???? lowest people so thats why i wrote this

you know - hmmm that time people have no choice - living is hard - selling their body is their means to live and eat... they dont deserve to die... they deserve some good things...

every people - prostitutes they are - deserve every single droplet of light (life)...
i think <Cross-7> is right to kinda lecture you for that one...
for me, those women aren't low or something - decent jobs are hard to find and well... hmm i think you still need to broaden your mind...
they're human and let's respect every people... ^^

Even if the idea of somone selling her body just makes me sad i dont know why and makes me wana salughter them but atleast he didnt kill Inoccent women ?? or did he?? not sure but prostitution may have been the only choice back then so ok i understood that but still CmOn

"A Suspicious Character," from The Illustrated London News for 13 October 1888 carrying the overall caption, "With the Vigilance Committee in the East End".

Background information

Birth name: Unknown
Alias(es): Unknown
Died: Unknown

Cause of death: Unknown
Killings
Number of victims: 5+ ?
Country: United Kingdom
Date apprehended: Not apprehended
Jack the Ripper is an alias given to an unidentified serial killer active in the largely impoverished Whitechapel area and adjacent districts of London, England, in the autumn of 1888. The name originated in a letter sent to the London Central News Agency by someone claiming to be the murderer.

The victims were women allegedly earning income as prostitutes, who were killed in public or semi-public places at night or in the early morning. Each victim's throat was cut, after which her body was mutilated. Theories suggest that the victims first were strangled, in order to silence them, which may explain the reported lack of blood at the crime scenes. The removal of internal organs from three of the victims led some officials at the time of the murders to propose that the killer possessed anatomical or surgical knowledge.

Newspapers, whose circulation had been growing during this era, bestowed widespread and enduring notoriety on the killer because of the attacks' savagery and the police's failure to capture the murderer (they sometimes missed him at the crime scenes by mere minutes).

Because the killer's identity has never been confirmed, the legends surrounding the murders have become a combination of genuine historical research, folklore, and pseudohistory. Many authors, historians, and amateur detectives have proposed theories about the identity of the killer and his victims.

.............................................
Wow...................
Well i cant say i support him but killing prostitutes kinda makes me happy since they dont deserve to live but hey he doesnt deserver to take thier lives

excuse me lonareas? they dont deserve to live? are you fucking serious? they're humans for christ sake. so what if they are prostitutes? they're just earing a living through sex. since they chose that path, they will overcome it. so stop your selfish act and saying they dont deserve to live.

i DONT CARE if u think they dont deserve it cause they selling thier body for sex ???? lowest people so thats why i wrote this

you know - hmmm that time people have no choice - living is hard - selling their body is their means to live and eat... they dont deserve to die... they deserve some good things...

every people - prostitutes they are - deserve every single droplet of light (life)...
i think <Cross-7> is right to kinda lecture you for that one...
for me, those women aren't low or something - decent jobs are hard to find and well... hmm i think you still need to broaden your mind...
they're human and let's respect every people... ^^

Even if the idea of somone selling her body just makes me sad i dont know why and makes me wana salughter them but at least he didnt kill Inoccent women ?? or did he?? not sure but prostitution may have been the only choice back then so ok i understood that but still CmOn

hehehe... well people particularly - women at that time have no choice T___T sad but that's the only way they can eat... they dont even have time to comb their hair nor look for other option...

you know not all women who sells their body agreed to it - try reading: Princess: A True Story of Life Behind the Veil in Saudi Arabia... its a novel about a princess yet force to give/ sell her body for she is a woman and woman in Saudi Arabia are treated differently...

what im saying is - that particular time - women have two choice: LIVE OR DIE of Hunger... to live is to sell their body and to die is a means of the end...

i know how you feel for those poor women... anyway - let's not be prejudice...

when you say at least he didnt kill Inoccent women are we - you and me and the rest of the world sure that those women who are in the high society are not deserving to be killed? if im not mistaken - the higher ups are far more cruel and not so innocent... those ladies in the ballroom, gossips and scandals are attach to them...

we can never say that this person deserve to die, or he or she is innocent - for we don't have the right to point a finger to them. hmmm...

have you encounter this words: stone to death that prostitute if you yourself have not sinned... (“He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.”)

hehehe... well people particularly - women at that time have no choice T___T sad but that's the only way they can eat... they dont even have time to comb their hair nor look for other option...

you know not all women who sells their body agreed to it - try reading: Princess: A True Story of Life Behind the Veil in Saudi Arabia... its a novel about a princess yet force to give/ sell her body for she is a woman and woman in Saudi Arabia are treated differently...

what im saying is - that particular time - women have two choice: LIVE OR DIE of Hunger... to live is to sell their body and to die is a means of the end...

i know how you feel for those poor women... anyway - let's not be prejudice...

when you say at least he didnt kill Inoccent women are we - you and me and the rest of the world sure that those women who are in the high society are not deserving to be killed? if im not mistaken - the higher ups are far more cruel and not so innocent... those ladies in the ballroom, gossips and scandals are attach to them...

we can never say that this person deserve to die, or he or she is innocent - for we don't have the right to point a finger to them. hmmm...

have you encounter this words: stone to death that prostitute if you yourself have not sinned... (“He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.”)

"A Suspicious Character," from The Illustrated London News for 13 October 1888 carrying the overall caption, "With the Vigilance Committee in the East End".

Background information

Birth name: Unknown
Alias(es): Unknown
Died: Unknown

Cause of death: Unknown
Killings
Number of victims: 5+ ?
Country: United Kingdom
Date apprehended: Not apprehended
Jack the Ripper is an alias given to an unidentified serial killer active in the largely impoverished Whitechapel area and adjacent districts of London, England, in the autumn of 1888. The name originated in a letter sent to the London Central News Agency by someone claiming to be the murderer.

The victims were women allegedly earning income as prostitutes, who were killed in public or semi-public places at night or in the early morning. Each victim's throat was cut, after which her body was mutilated. Theories suggest that the victims first were strangled, in order to silence them, which may explain the reported lack of blood at the crime scenes. The removal of internal organs from three of the victims led some officials at the time of the murders to propose that the killer possessed anatomical or surgical knowledge.

Newspapers, whose circulation had been growing during this era, bestowed widespread and enduring notoriety on the killer because of the attacks' savagery and the police's failure to capture the murderer (they sometimes missed him at the crime scenes by mere minutes).

Because the killer's identity has never been confirmed, the legends surrounding the murders have become a combination of genuine historical research, folklore, and pseudohistory. Many authors, historians, and amateur detectives have proposed theories about the identity of the killer and his victims.

.............................................
Wow...................
Well i cant say i support him but killing prostitutes kinda makes me happy since they dont deserve to live but hey he doesnt deserver to take thier lives

excuse me lonareas? they dont deserve to live? are you fucking serious? they're humans for christ sake. so what if they are prostitutes? they're just earing a living through sex. since they chose that path, they will overcome it. so stop your selfish act and saying they dont deserve to live.

i DONT CARE if u think they dont deserve it cause they selling thier body for sex ???? lowest people so thats why i wrote this

you know - hmmm that time people have no choice - living is hard - selling their body is their means to live and eat... they dont deserve to die... they deserve some good things...

every people - prostitutes they are - deserve every single droplet of light (life)...
i think <Cross-7> is right to kinda lecture you for that one...
for me, those women aren't low or something - decent jobs are hard to find and well... hmm i think you still need to broaden your mind...
they're human and let's respect every people... ^^

Even if the idea of somone selling her body just makes me sad i dont know why and makes me wana salughter them but at least he didnt kill Inoccent women ?? or did he?? not sure but prostitution may have been the only choice back then so ok i understood that but still CmOn

hehehe... well people particularly - women at that time have no choice T___T sad but that's the only way they can eat... they dont even have time to comb their hair nor look for other option...

you know not all women who sells their body agreed to it - try reading: Princess: A True Story of Life Behind the Veil in Saudi Arabia... its a novel about a princess yet force to give/ sell her body for she is a woman and woman in Saudi Arabia are treated differently...

what im saying is - that particular time - women have two choice: LIVE OR DIE of Hunger... to live is to sell their body and to die is a means of the end...

i know how you feel for those poor women... anyway - let's not be prejudice...

when you say at least he didnt kill Inoccent women are we - you and me and the rest of the world sure that those women who are in the high society are not deserving to be killed? if im not mistaken - the higher ups are far more cruel and not so innocent... those ladies in the ballroom, gossips and scandals are attach to them...

we can never say that this person deserve to die, or he or she is innocent - for we don't have the right to point a finger to them. hmmm...

have you encounter this words: stone to death that prostitute if you yourself have not sinned... (“He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.”)

Im muslim so thats why i kinda feel pissed but ye they didnt have a choice and saudi arabia?? The princess actually sold her body gotta know more about that and oh U have a point at that inoccent women thing but That last part i didnt get Is it from the bible or something

hehehe... well people particularly - women at that time have no choice T___T sad but that's the only way they can eat... they dont even have time to comb their hair nor look for other option...

you know not all women who sells their body agreed to it - try reading: Princess: A True Story of Life Behind the Veil in Saudi Arabia... its a novel about a princess yet force to give/ sell her body for she is a woman and woman in Saudi Arabia are treated differently...

what im saying is - that particular time - women have two choice: LIVE OR DIE of Hunger... to live is to sell their body and to die is a means of the end...

i know how you feel for those poor women... anyway - let's not be prejudice...

when you say at least he didnt kill Inoccent women are we - you and me and the rest of the world sure that those women who are in the high society are not deserving to be killed? if im not mistaken - the higher ups are far more cruel and not so innocent... those ladies in the ballroom, gossips and scandals are attach to them...

we can never say that this person deserve to die, or he or she is innocent - for we don't have the right to point a finger to them. hmmm...

have you encounter this words: stone to death that prostitute if you yourself have not sinned... (“He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.”)

hmm i dont get it XD haha....

HAHAH YEAH That's from the Bible > simple means the story goes like these:

According to the Gospel of John, the Pharisees, in an attempt to discredit Jesus, brought a woman charged with adultery before him. Then they reminded Jesus that adultery was punishable by stoning under Mosaic law and challenged him to judge the woman so that they might then accuse him of disobeying the law. Jesus thought for a moment and then replied, “He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.” The people crowded around him were so touched by their own consciences that they departed. When Jesus found himself alone with the woman, he asked her who were her accusers. She replied, “No man, lord.” Jesus then said, “Neither do I condemn thee: go and sin no more.”

"A Suspicious Character," from The Illustrated London News for 13 October 1888 carrying the overall caption, "With the Vigilance Committee in the East End".

Background information

Birth name: Unknown
Alias(es): Unknown
Died: Unknown

Cause of death: Unknown
Killings
Number of victims: 5+ ?
Country: United Kingdom
Date apprehended: Not apprehended
Jack the Ripper is an alias given to an unidentified serial killer active in the largely impoverished Whitechapel area and adjacent districts of London, England, in the autumn of 1888. The name originated in a letter sent to the London Central News Agency by someone claiming to be the murderer.

The victims were women allegedly earning income as prostitutes, who were killed in public or semi-public places at night or in the early morning. Each victim's throat was cut, after which her body was mutilated. Theories suggest that the victims first were strangled, in order to silence them, which may explain the reported lack of blood at the crime scenes. The removal of internal organs from three of the victims led some officials at the time of the murders to propose that the killer possessed anatomical or surgical knowledge.

Newspapers, whose circulation had been growing during this era, bestowed widespread and enduring notoriety on the killer because of the attacks' savagery and the police's failure to capture the murderer (they sometimes missed him at the crime scenes by mere minutes).

Because the killer's identity has never been confirmed, the legends surrounding the murders have become a combination of genuine historical research, folklore, and pseudohistory. Many authors, historians, and amateur detectives have proposed theories about the identity of the killer and his victims.

.............................................
Wow...................
Well i cant say i support him but killing prostitutes kinda makes me happy since they dont deserve to live but hey he doesnt deserver to take thier lives

excuse me lonareas? they dont deserve to live? are you fucking serious? they're humans for christ sake. so what if they are prostitutes? they're just earing a living through sex. since they chose that path, they will overcome it. so stop your selfish act and saying they dont deserve to live.

i DONT CARE if u think they dont deserve it cause they selling thier body for sex ???? lowest people so thats why i wrote this

you know - hmmm that time people have no choice - living is hard - selling their body is their means to live and eat... they dont deserve to die... they deserve some good things...

every people - prostitutes they are - deserve every single droplet of light (life)...
i think <Cross-7> is right to kinda lecture you for that one...
for me, those women aren't low or something - decent jobs are hard to find and well... hmm i think you still need to broaden your mind...
they're human and let's respect every people... ^^

Even if the idea of somone selling her body just makes me sad i dont know why and makes me wana salughter them but at least he didnt kill Inoccent women ?? or did he?? not sure but prostitution may have been the only choice back then so ok i understood that but still CmOn

hehehe... well people particularly - women at that time have no choice T___T sad but that's the only way they can eat... they dont even have time to comb their hair nor look for other option...

you know not all women who sells their body agreed to it - try reading: Princess: A True Story of Life Behind the Veil in Saudi Arabia... its a novel about a princess yet force to give/ sell her body for she is a woman and woman in Saudi Arabia are treated differently...

what im saying is - that particular time - women have two choice: LIVE OR DIE of Hunger... to live is to sell their body and to die is a means of the end...

i know how you feel for those poor women... anyway - let's not be prejudice...

when you say at least he didnt kill Inoccent women are we - you and me and the rest of the world sure that those women who are in the high society are not deserving to be killed? if im not mistaken - the higher ups are far more cruel and not so innocent... those ladies in the ballroom, gossips and scandals are attach to them...

we can never say that this person deserve to die, or he or she is innocent - for we don't have the right to point a finger to them. hmmm...

have you encounter this words: stone to death that prostitute if you yourself have not sinned... (“He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.”)

Im muslim so thats why i kinda feel pissed but ye they didnt have a choice and saudi arabia?? The princess actually sold her body gotta know more about that and oh U have a point at that inoccent women thing but That last part i didnt get Is it from the bible or something

YEAH That's from the Bible > simple means the story goes like these:

According to the Gospel of John, the Pharisees, in an attempt to discredit Jesus, brought a woman charged with adultery before him. Then they reminded Jesus that adultery was punishable by stoning under Mosaic law and challenged him to judge the woman so that they might then accuse him of disobeying the law. Jesus thought for a moment and then replied, “He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.” The people crowded around him were so touched by their own consciences that they departed. When Jesus found himself alone with the woman, he asked her who were her accusers. She replied, “No man, lord.” Jesus then said, “Neither do I condemn thee: go and sin no more.”