> How about going after "Try hard to improve things, but don't shake the house
> too much while at it"? There is a "cost" to improving things, and if you
> have to disturb everyone to do it, then that cost is high. It may not be
> worth it.
What? How does that not apply to the very DM proposal that you are
defending? Nobody has convinced me that the added bureaucracy and
lengthened power hierarchy are costs which are outweighed by whatever
advantages you perceive in this plan.