Puzzling Question about Rotation

Is it possible to turn 180 degree for a person who is standing on a absolutely frictionless surface? Air friction is supposed to present. The person can jump vertically and spin in air.thats one possible scenario. Are there any others??
Also if air friction is neglible is it possible to turn 180 degree?

Ignoring the air and assuming a frictionless surface, angular momentum (in this case zero) is maintained, so a person can rotate their arms in a circle over their head, moving their arms clockwise to turn their body counter-clockwise or vice versa, to change the angular orientation.

yeah, absolutely angular momentum would be conserved. But arms and feet are'nt two separate entities.They belong to the same entity-body.

But you are free to orient your limbs relative to your torso. It's only a single rigid body that cannot reorient itself in space.

For visualisation:
Take a cylinder shaped satellite, in orbit. Inside the cylinder, at the center of mass, there is a disk, with the axis paralllel to the axis of the cylinder. Let's say that disk's mass is 1/100th of the satellites' mass.

Spin up the disk. Spinning up the disk causes the satellite to counter-rotate around its axis, but slower than the disk, as the satellite is heavier. After the satellite has rotated 180 degrees spin the disk down again.

I assume astrounauts in weightless conditions do something like that. They will windmill one or both arms to reorient themselves.

Is it possible to turn 180 degree for a person who is standing on a absolutely frictionless surface? Air friction is supposed to present. The person can jump vertically and spin in air.thats one possible scenario. Are there any others??
Also if air friction is neglible is it possible to turn 180 degree?

In order to "spin in air" the person would have to have to have applied a rotary force before jumping. And he could not do that on a frictionless subject.

Staff: Mentor

Re: Puzzling Question

Another example, which I've done many times as a classroom demonstration: Sit on a frictionless rotating stool while holding a bicycle wheel horizontally. Everything is initally stationary. With one hand, start the wheel rotating clockwise. You and the stool start to rotate counterclockwise in order to conserve total angular momentum. When you've rotated 180 degrees, stop the spinning wheel. You stop too, in your new orientation.

It doesn't even have to be a wheel. You can hold an object in your hands, out in front of you, and move it around in a horizontal clockwise circular motion. Same result.

This image is from TR Kane's and MP Scher's seminal paper on the subject, A dynamical explanation of the falling cat phenomenon. Thomas R. Kane is no slouch. Study robotics and you will inevitably learn about Kanes' dynamics equations. He is in a sense the father of modern robotics.

This image is from TR Kane's and MP Scher's seminal paper on the subject, A dynamical explanation of the falling cat phenomenon. Thomas R. Kane is no slouch. Study robotics and you will inevitably learn about Kanes' dynamics equations. He is in a sense the father of modern robotics.

This is Kane's two-parts-cat model animated:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGusK69XVlk

A human standing on frictionless surface could try the same (basically a hula hoop swing), but would probably fall over. Swinging arms seems better here.