Strife Onizuka in game,
I'm an immigrant from URU. Was in all 3 of it's beta's.

Wiki Troll (I'm a good troll, I'm not here to cause drama).

I had a webpage but I hadn't updated it in several years and then Geocities closed.

Wiki's are the way of the future when it comes to making documentation Ad-hoc. A wiki attracts all sorts of contributes, starting with basic users all the way through experts; likewise contributions can range in quality and overall cohesiveness. The majority of contributes are casual contributes, they may add a paragraph, an example or just fix spelling. The average contribute will try to expand and correct existing articles. While the wiki format can make it easy for users to contribute, articles have a tendency to be of average quality but generally up to date, a book on the otherhand would tend to be of higher quality but would quickly be out of date. The average quality is caused by the types of contributions authors make, additions and corrections, once an article becomes sufficient large it is hard for the users to see just how to improve it further. As the articles grow they aren't being redesigned, reorganized, they aren't being properly refocused on the important & key content and presenting it in an aesthetic way. This gives the articles an unprofessional feel, the problem isn't how factual the content is but how it is presented and organized. However reworking an article in this fashion, refocusing it, is highly controversial as it involves transforming existing content. Technical content is extremely hard to transform because of the subtle meanings of the vocabulary, consequently it's transformation is often the focus of controversy. The technical vocabulary makes it a target for transformation as the goal of the transformation is to improve the presentation and making the content more accessible. In these situations the transformation has to be carefully coordinated and it helps if it is done by an expert. The amount of care required is more often then not more than a casual contributor is willing to invest. The result is a poisoning of the wiki community, dissatisfaction grows not just because of the quality but also from the apparent lack of improvement (both community and self loathing can occur). This dissatisfaction can be exacerbated by continued content creation that is perceived as sub-par (the reasoning goes that it demonstrates the contributors haven't learned how to produces quality content).