To create a greater understanding of men and women and our struggle in todays society, specifically The United States. Please feel free to contribute and offer your own writings and information in the comments section.

Friday, October 29, 2010

In 2009 the birthrate fell to 13.5 births for every 1,000 people—down from 14.3 in 2007—which set a record for the lowest rate in a century.-Newsweek Magazine

Interesting.... The end of the Roman Republic anyone? History repeats itself aye.

Do not let the government steal our women......Understand? Women are not the enemy, it is their relationship with the Government Husband and their hypergamous mating preference which has manifested itself by female political agency. I ask you quite sincerely to study the laws feminist organizations and related ferver and that of our Federal Council On Women and Girls.

I have found so many parallels between women's relationship with government and my own personal life experiences it is astounding.

At heart I really do adore women. God bless them they are such a blessing but I will tell you a story.

I stopped by a bar the other night with many beautiful college girls in their reproductive prime. Women are most fertile at 25. Anyway, two strange women on separate occasions walked right up and to me and told me to buy them a drink (sex on the beach). It must be a thing among college girls. The young males at that age are very beta and lack resources or status but must fork over drinks like you wouldn't believe. I wonder how many of these boys grew up in a single mother home? Anyway I told them "no thank you."

They liked being told no but I wanted nothing to do with them. Something hit me viscerally about this very interesting socio-sexual, socio-biological circumstance I found myself in. I believe perhaps women want to test if you're beta by arbitrarily demanding resources from men. God love them but I truly believe women are all consummate. Hmm unlike men, government can't tell women no....this is the problem.

Once I realized truly what was going on I looked around and realized an inordinate amount of college boys getting reprimanded and disciplined by their girlfriends over the course of the evening.

I intervened to help three young men that night. I told them women will be as demanding as you let them be. They will raise the bar to see if you'll break. Once they supplicate and dominate you they dump you for a dominate man. I think I helped these young men.

One girl came back around for another round of verbal interchange with her boyfriend and the guy took my advise. She changed her demeanor right away. Good for him. It really is tough living under a female dominated government and associated matriarchy. I am beginning to understand the writings of Roman men when marriage rates and family disintegration took place during the final days of their Republic as well. The intolerability of their women and associated rapid decline of marriage and birth rates.

I've said it before here but do you know where the expression "you can't live with them and you can't live without them came from" ???

Upon the dissolution of the Roman family, falling birth rates, female sexuality moving from private and monogamous to public and promiscuous the Roman general, statesman, and censor Quintus Caecilius Metellus Macedonicus states in 131 B.C....

"If we could survive without a wife, citizens of Rome, all of us would do without that nuisance.” So proclaimed the Roman general, statesman, and censor.

Still, he went on to plead, falling birthrates required that Roman men fulfill their duty to reproduce, no matter how irritating Roman women might have become.

"Since nature has so decreed that we cannot manage comfortably with them, nor live in any way without them, we must plan for our lasting preservation rather than for our temporary pleasure."

Wow, our birth rate in the U.S. is barely sustaining replacement levels.

So Quintus said the above in 131 B.C... It seems The Roman family really declined in the final century of the Republic--that is, the period from 146 BCE to 49 BCE when Julius Caesar was proclaimed sole dictator.

During the last century of the Roman Republic, no-fault divorce was introduced.

Following the complete end of Manus Marriage in the 1st century BC (100-1 B.C) and the emergence of Free Marriage Divorce, divorced ceased needing any reason, (No Fault Divorce).

Anyway, It's unfortunate....Unlike men, the government won't tell women no when they demand resources....It will be the death of this country if we don't stop this. I love women but they can be all consummate. They don't understand where the things around them come from. I really don't mean to be condescending. Perhaps they have as equally stimulating stipulations and postulations about men. I can tell you one thing though...feminism is certainly not it.

To me, feminism and female agency in government seems to elicit the worst of female and male nature. They form a relationship like no other that we as men can't compete with. Woman's relationship with Government Husband is unbearable. Her relationship with Government Husband is the most tortuous experiences for men to bear. It is an anguishing tyranny for sure. I love my country but I believe it is in grave danger and that we must do what we can to protect it. I don't like the division I sense in my country. I don't like what is in the air and pray that we can heal as a nation. I pray that we come together and make families again.....

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

The 2010 U.S. Census results are in. The census shows the proportion of U.S. adults between 25 and 34 who have never been married exceeded those who are married for the first time in more than a century. There is no sign of this turning around anytime soon. There is great momentum behind the trends of women's collective divorce from men and their marriage to their government husband.

The best thing men can do is stick together, form ranks as a separate socio-political and socio-economic class with separate unconstitutional representation within government by gender like women have. If we can manage to represent our gender class we will have a fighting chance to remove representation by gender and even race or religion for that matter and restore The Constitution of The United States. We have representation by gender and race now, and I fear that if we do not act now, representation by religion will not be far behind.

Unfortunately I don't think men will be able to compete with women's government husband and "women first" female agency in government. I think as men we must protect ourselves. One of the best things men can do is make the decision to protect yourselves and your property rights and this goes with the God given right to be a father. I think things will get a lot worse before they get better for us men. I hope that someday men will win property rights to our bodies and the fruits of its labor. I hope that we will win the right to shared custody of children. Whatever we do we must protect ourselves especially from Marriage. The best advise I could give another young man like myself is to never get married.

Sorry, the graph below is a little dated. The single woman birth rate is now 40%-42% of all births. Again, there is significant momentum behind these trends.

There is hope though. Look at the reset in the single mother birth trend momentum starting in 1993. This was when one of women's resource constructs was reformed i.e. welfare reform took place. If we can manage to establish more property rights in marriage and thus our obligations to women in divorce we will be able to reduce the trend momentum even more. Men must fight to establish property rights to our bodies and the fruits of its labor.

If we can establish shared custody of children, women will bear some sort of liability and reciprocal obligation toward men and the institution of marriage. They initiate 70+% of divorces now but if we are able to give women an equally responsible part to play in the institution of marriage they may be much less likely to make men and fathers disposable to the family.

We have a tough fight ahead of us men. Women organized in numbers in the 1960's. Their leaders lobbied for the creation and institution of no-fault divorce laws and no-fault entitlement to the male body and the fruits of its labor.

If we can reform "women first" laws in college admissions and job hirings we can reduce the level at which women are our competitors and adversaries for territory and resources. If we can manage a few of these changes or all of them we will have a fighting chance at being a part of the family again. The problem is that women's leaders have managed to devote the Stimulus Package to women and are now seeking further enforcement of laws which dictate that Federal job contracts be given to women owned businesses. The truth is that we have taken heavy casualties men but the fight IS NOT OVER! WE HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO FIGHT! The bond we share with women is sacred. I don't believe women themselves are the enemy but rather their female nature has been given agency within government. The nature of government is continual growth. Our founding fathers believed that government is a necessary evil but by nature it seeks to be all powerful and seeks continual growth, they believed that government is tyranny. To men, family, marriage and fatherhood this will all continue to be the death of us if we don't fight.

Yes, women have married the government. Yes, all male property rights have been removed along with any right to the prospect of shared custody of our children. Those of you how are an MRA or follow these issues know that women are vehemently opposed to shared parenting. Without political agency we will be unable to defeat women's leaders. Please go to ACFC.org and sign the shared parenting petition. The American Coalition of Fathers and Children has been making valiant efforts to change feminist laws. We can't do it without YOU. I hope that women will join us in our fight.

I don't know what to tell you men. Women said they wanted this back in the 1960's and have not stopped since. They were not joking when they shouted "the personal is political". We have no choice but to continue to withdraw. I wish I had better news for you guys, I really do. We can only take comfort in the solace that this can not go on forever. When the Matriarchy collapses men will be a part of the family again. Hang in there men. I believe our decline as a nation will be exponential. Never stop fighting my dear countrymen. Never give up hope that we can turn this around. At very least if we are unable to form a mutually reciprocal bond with women then we must continue on course with staunch resistance to women's demands to be dependent on us.

In this respect I will make something perfectly clear. MEN HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO SUPPORT A WOMAN'S FAMILY AND "HER" CHILDREN....NONE!

The decisions we make as a nation now will dictate whether our country lives or dies. We must not give up. We must fight! I will fight along side all of you. If the time ever comes my countrymen I will kill along side you in battle. I will die along side you. This is our home. When it comes down to it, our homeland, our jobs and the prospect of family is all that we have men. We must continue to fight and NEVER SURRENDER!

Monday, October 11, 2010

Don't you just love the corporate media and the globalist profiteers! Nice try "Newsweek" We know multinationals and corporate interests profit off of the death of male jobs, globalization and the loss of America's economic sovereignty.

I guess men will just role over and take on a service sector job while you marginalize and consolidate the labor pool in one spot, then drive down wages even more.

REMEMBER MEN, REMEMBER WHAT YOUR MASTERS TELL YOU, GLOBALIZATION IS GOOD FOR YOU. Don't prove that you have a weak male ego and hold onto "throwback masculinity" "musty script of masculinity" and "Marlboro manliness".

Don't say anything about the multinational corporate pig "Newsweek" article....it will only prove you are as unmanly as they said you are if you resist....Give in men....accept what the profiteering globalists pigs are doing to the middle class. Accept the liquidation of our sovereignty and way of life.

Attention "Newsweek" we know where your interests are. Your "news" article reminds me of something you would read in the Ex Soviet Pravda magazine. We know who's side you are on..

Remember men, remember that according to Newsweek and the corporate media

we are now "an economy that’s rapidly outgrowing Marlboro Manliness."

Accept that the "“manly” sectors of the U.S. economy continue to shrink"

Remember men accept our defeat in order to make money for the globalist corporations who run Newsweek.

“Conceiving of masculinity as something to be”—a part to play—“turns manliness into [something] ornamental" So give up men. Don't fight it.

You brutish men, still holding on to an intact and sovereign economy aren't you

You are holding on to "throwback masculine" ideals and:

"watching television shows such as Dirty Jobs, Ax Men, and Deadliest Catch re-romanticizing soot-collared work. A rapper’s saggy jeans, a hunter’s concealed weapon, a suburbanite’s man cave, a hipster’s obsession with Don Draper: all might be seen as variations of the same coping mechanism. The impulse transcends race and class."

Don't hold on men, give up. Don't fight it. Accept your defeat.

Remember men are "still overrepresented in business and government" anyway. Make room for the oppressed class you brutish men, make room for women you Patriarchs.

Embrace our trade deficit men, you sheep, embrace the demise of your homeland so the corporations can profit off globalization.

Stay home men, after all, the government and business will pay you to do it. Give up men, there is no hope. Globalization, the liquidation of our production base, of male jobs is good for you.

Remember "suggesting that men should stick to some musty script of masculinity only perpetuates the problem"

Stay home men....stay home...don't prove you are an unevolved caveman who holds on to "throwback masculinity". Embrace The New Economy. Our propaganda in Newsweek and other corporate media will help you accept this.

You think myself and my countrymen are animals don't you! You think we will stand idle while you bury us and kill us off. My countrymen are no fools. Myself and my countrymen will fight!

My countrymen, will not forgive our corrupt government and its spineless politicians. My countrymen will not forgive the control that special interests and multinational corporations have established in OUR GOVERNMENT!

WE WILL NOT TOLERATE WHAT YOU HAVE DONE TO OUR MEN AND OUR FAMILIES!!! MEN KNOW YOU SEEK TO DESTROY US IN OUR OWN COUNTRY. MEN WATCH CLOSELY EVERYTHING YOU DO AND SAY! MY BROTHERS, MY COUNTRYMEN WILL NOT TOLERATE IT! WE WILL ORGANIZE, WE WILL FIGHT!

See: Workhorses of the Matriarchy

I'VE NOTICED OTHER MEN ARE REALIZING WHAT YOU HAVE DONE TO OUR COUNTRY..MEN YOU ARE NOT ALONE IN THIS FIGHT....

Subscribe To REBUKING FEMINISM

About Me

Premise Claimer

To create a greater understanding of men and women and our struggle in todays society in the United States. Please feel free to contribute and offer your own writings and information in the comments section and at REBUKEFEM@YAHOO.COM.

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or the people"

- 10th Amendment United States Constitution

Feminism stands on the principal of equality or classlessness. These principals are the hallmark of Marxist socialist theory. Essentially equal outcome by unequal means and unequal protection under law to reach these ends.

Males being a minority both in numbers and a minority of the voting majority has lead to class conflict, oppression and division based off "gender" of this minority class.

"Bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, (the female voting and numerical majority) that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority (males) possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression" - President Thomas Jefferson.

Affirmative Action, Title IX, VAWA, Divorce, Family and Child Custody Law to name a few.

Make no mistake, women are not your natural enemy. However, they are the body politic of feminism and the female political agency responsible for it. All women are responsible for feminism and the actions of their union. They have created class division between men and women toward the ends of dividing us both. The division of male and female as separate classes with unequal representation under law and policy has been the principal means to usurp and rule our people. Feminism has destroyed the common felicity between men and women. Feminism removed ALL male rights in marriage and thus divorce while absolving women of all liability of commitment. Feminism has removed the right to fatherhood. Men have no place in the family and should not commit to the institution of it. We must both fight the tyranny of feminism.