Frank, are you aware of those photographs of Kristin Kreuk and Allison Mack at a NXIVM event in Albany, New York in 2009?

Also in attendance was the Native American actor and “activist” Russell Means, who played the father in the film The Last Of The Mohicans. Kristin Kreuk and Alison Mack, obviously using their fame to represent NXIVM, were onstage with a microphone as was Russell Means.

Isn’t it true that NXIVM were targeting prominent Native Americans so that they can lay claim to land, that Keith Raniere would control with his own currency!? There are still some photographs online, but I can’t seem to find the ones with Russell Means. They are definitely there though.

Provided some photos. Siobahn Hotaling is in one of them.

It is not clear who posted this video – whether it was a fanboy or Kreuk’s paid staff.

Kreuk was supporting an organization called Executive Success Programs

NXIVM is led by this prince of a man, Keith Alan Raniere, known also as The Vanguard.

After a time, Keith Raniere and Allison Mack introduced this meaningful symbol – which represents, they said, the four elements. It was branded on the pubic region of female slaves with a white-hot cauterizing pen.

MK10ART created this marvelous painting. It is of Dr. Brandon Porter and one of his subjects for a human-fright study he was conducting. These studies were going on in Albany – the headquarters of NXIVM – where Kristin Kreuk came to lend her name and support.

This is a copy of the latest paperwork for NXIVM. No, a confidentiality agreement is not necessary to read it. It is a letter, filed with the court, from Keith Raniere’s attorney – for the judge – to get him out on bail.

“This was Kristin Kook’s Indian phase. For a time, she would buy clothes from an Indian fashion shop on Granville Island, to look Global and hip.”

Like many liberal virtue signalers, I bet Kook has a problem with so-called “cultural appropriation” – where the virtue signaling PC brigade attack ONLY white people for embracing something found in a non-white culture, yet would Kook consider her wearing Indian clothing cultural appropriation? Nope. White chicks are shit on for wearing hooped ear rings.

“Acting skills from the Steven Seagal School of Acting”

Her acting “skills”, or lack of have been dubbed “smell the fart acting” here on Frank Report.

On the tiniest chance your comment was made out of ignorance rather than misc butthurtery: the reason why “ONLY white people”–which I’ll refer to as the “dominant culture” henceforth–are charged with “appropriating” other cultures when it would seem they are merely “embracing” them is because one generally CAN’T appropriate a dominant culture because it’s forced upon you. The best illustration would be dreadlocks. There is a well-documented history of non-white people who have worn their hair in this style (or other “natural” or curly styles) being discriminated against (as looking unprofessional at best but more often “too ethnic”) and even targeted for violence. While a white frat-boy sporting dreads like cool-dude Bob Marley may endure some comments from his parents or disapproving looks from say, me, the inherent riskiness of his “embracing” this hairstyle is low. Furthermore, if it comes down to nobody hiring him because of his faux locs, he can dispense with the style. Simply by cutting his hair short again, he now has the acceptable aesthetic of the dominant culture. Whereas an African-American perming, hot-combing, ironing their hair straight is not “appropriation” even if it’s an aesthetic choice, because this style conforms to that of the dominant culture rather than existing outside of it.

Whether one should or shouldn’t wear or do something b/c it appropriates other cultures (or classes… I keep thinking of Carrie on Sex and the City saying, “well, I wear ghetto gold for fun!”) is another story. But someone concerned about being hurtful or hypocritical may value knowing the pros/cons of using someone else’s culture as fashion that you can put on or take off as it conveniences you,

The smugness of liberals is thicker than pollution. Nobody forces anything on non-white people living in white countries. Non-white people living in white countries want to live there. There are thousands of Honduran people walking through Mexico to get to the US. They don’t want to live in Mexico. If you are non-white and you live in a white country, you don’t get to insult the majority average Joe’s and Jane’s by accusing them of forcing their culture on you when they are not doing anything. In America, non-whites accuse whites of having no culture, so what culture is being forced on them? Italian American? Irish American?

In China, the dominant culture is Chinese culture. So according to you, if a Slavic person moves to China and sees a Chinese person wearing some kind of traditional Slavic clothing, he can accuse the Chinese person of “cultural appropriation” because the dominant culture is Chinese and not Slavic? Bear in mind also, “Slav” literally means “slave” as the Slavic people were enslaved in huge numbers by invader Muslim Arabs and Ottoman Turks. Were they “privileged straight white males”? How about the huge number of Irish slaves taken by the Muslim Barbary slavers?

There are quite a few Africans living and working in China. If an African sees a Chinese person wearing dreadlocks, is that “cultural appropriation” because the dominant culture is Chinese and not African?

You think French people are forcing their French culture on the blacks and Arabs who have saturated France? White/European people are getting more and more sick of being constantly attacked for nothing. We have the right to exist in our own countries. Not only are whites not forcing their culture(s) on anyone at home, they are also not forcing anyone to stay. Being the majority in your own country is not oppressing minorities.

And no, I am not “racist”, a “bigot”, “KKK” or anything else you liberals like to call us.

Now if you don’t mind, I’m going to eat some THAI sweet chili potato chips and no I am not oppressing Thai people for doing so.

— Slav” literally means “slave” as the Slavic people were enslaved in huge numbers by invader Muslim Arabs and Ottoman Turks. Were they “privileged straight white males”? How about the huge number of Irish slaves taken by the Muslim Barbary slavers?

No. Just because something looks like an English word doesn’t mean its meaning is similar to the English word. Haha.

What if the dominant culture is non white but the minorities (by choise) are white, such as Irish people in Bangladesh? Does that not fit your anti-white narrative? You would probably say that there is no such thing as “reverse cultural appropriation” where whites are minorities in a non-white country.

In Germany, the dominant culture is indigenous German (white). There are other Europeans living in Germany such as Greeks (also white, but still foreign). Are the Greeks having dominant German culture forced on them? Can they accuse Germans of “cultural appropriation” for doing something related to Greek culture, or does that not count in your little libtard mind because they are both white so “basically the same”?

What about the minority (numerically fewer in number) Rohingya living in Burma? Two non-white people. Not including the genocide, if a Burmese person from the dominant culture embraces something from the Rohingya culture, is that “cultural appropriation”?

It’s fashionable to hate white people. No matter what country, it is considered a requirement if you are a liberal. White liberals think they are cool and hip for attacking their own race. Really, they are dickheads.

Western military/intelligence personnel often wear Arabic/Muslim clothing and grow their beards out when operating in Muslim-dominant countries. They do it to fit in. Are they culturally appropriating Arab culture in these Arab countries?

Oh bullshit. A label is a label. They become offensive with the winds of change or the tides of the ocean. All so people like you can label people like me racist. You can’t debate facts so you rely on emotion

NoisyMouse, November 16, 2018 at 2:53pm – brought up her Indian looking clothing in the pictures. He or she was not making any reference to the article, just the pictures. It had nothing to do with Russell Means being Native American “Indian”. You came in and started insulting people.

You are a cowardly bully. You are wrong and you wont admit it. Instead you double down with further insults. You are very smug.

LOL. You can only see a small portion of her clothes. Where can you tell she’s wearing Indian (Asian) clothes here? Where’s the Sari, the Daputa, or the Shalwar Kamese. She’s wearing a scarf like all NXIVM women did way back when.

I copied and pasted a section of the article that explains the origins of the word “slave” and the article it came from.

Nobody said “Slav” is an English word. But it is widely accepted that the word “Slave” comes from the word “Slav”, a people who were enslaved and treated appallingly be the Muslims who captured and enslaved them. That is history. Whether you like it or not, “Sultan”.

ROFL. No it doesn’t. You took the word “slav” from a source on African slavery, stated “slave” was derived from it”, and then conflated it with some false slavery of the Slavic people by Ottomans/Muslims. You literally meshed the history of two different peoples together in a virtual blender. Slavic has never been used to refer to the slaves of Africa.

You fucking stupid idiot. I did not link the word “slavic” with slaves in Africa. I am talking about where the origins of the WORD “slaves” comes from.

African slaves are not called “slavic”. They are called “slaves” and the WORD “slaves” – irregardless of where the slave people are from, comes from the WORD “slav” which is the name of a people enslaved by muslims and Turks.

I simply went online looking for an article I could copy and paste as I could no be bothered to type things out and I just so happened to find the article I posted. I only cut and pasted the relevant part to my point. I added the link so you could see where the copy and paste job came from. But no, you have to be a narcissistic arrogant smug cunt.

You are an imbecile. You will never admit to being wrong will you? You must be absolutely insufferable and unbearable in real life.

You literally used “slav”, “slave”, and the “Slavic” people together and some made up history about them being enslaved by Ottomans and then literally backed it up with a website source that has “The Story of Africa” and “Slavery” in its banner. The Ottoman empire wasn’t even formed until the 14th century.

Also, that first paragraph is not even credible. How did the Muslims of Spain – which is in WESTERN Europe – take as “slaves” the “Slavs” – LOL – who inhabited EASTERN Europe?

“You literally used “slav”, “slave”, and the “Slavic” people together and some made up history about them being enslaved by Ottomans and then literally backed it up with a website source that has “The Story of Africa” and “Slavery” in its banner. The Ottoman empire wasn’t even formed until the 14th century.”

You need executing. I cannot make it any more clearer. Are you dumb or are you arrogantly pretending you are right?

***************

Get this through your thick skull you scumbag:

– The word SLAVE comes from the word SLAV.

– The word SLAV is the name of the SLAV people.

– Muslims and Ottoman Turks both enslaved SLAV PEOPLE. How dare you accuse me of making that up? These people were treated appallingly and you have the audacity to accuse me of making it up?

– The article being about African slavery is irrelevant. I went looking for a DESCRIPTION for the ORIGINS FOR THE WORD “SLAVERY”. I happened to find a description on an article on African slavery. It could of been an article on slavery in India. I copied and pasted the section on the ORIGINS OF THE WORD “SLAVERY” and ignored the rest as it was not relevant to my point.

– I posted the link to make it clear the words were not my own. I only copied and pasted the relevant bit and left out the irrelevant parts.

***********************************

“Also, that first paragraph is not even credible. How did the Muslims of Spain – which is in WESTERN Europe – take as “slaves” the “Slavs” – LOL – who inhabited EASTERN Europe?”

Spain, a southern European country was under muslim occupation for centuries. Not that that is relevant to the origins of the word “slave”.

Are you actually denying Arab muslims and Ottoman Turks enslaved the Slav people? Are you this arrogant? You are a disgusting human being. Arrogant, smug, rude and wrong.

— “Slav” literally means “slave” as the Slavic people were enslaved in huge numbers by invader Muslim Arabs and Ottoman Turks.

Slav does not literally mean “slave”. The latter word was DERIVED from “Slav”. And according to the Wiki you linked the SLAVIC SLAVES were called “Saqaliba”. If “Slavic” or “Slav” means slave then that would literally be a tautology.

EVERY PEOPLE AND CULTURE IN THE WORLD THAT EXISTED OVER A THOUSAND YEARS AGO HAD SOME FORM OF SLAVERY. You made it seem like it was only the Ottomans/Muslims took the Slavic people as slaves en masse.

“Word History: The derivation of the word slave encapsulates a bit of European history and explains why the two words slave and Slav are so similar; they are, in fact, historically identical. The word slave first appears in English around 1290, spelled sclave. The spelling is based on Old French esclave from Medieval Latin sclavus, “Slav, slave,” first recorded around 800. Sclavus comes from Byzantine Greek sklabos (pronounced sklävōs) “Slav,” which appears around 580. Sklavos approximates the Slavs’ own name for themselves, the Slověnci, surviving in English Slovene and Slovenian. The spelling of English slave, closer to its original Slavic form, first appears in English in the 1500s. Slavs became slaves around the beginning of the ninth century when the Holy Roman Empire tried to stabilize a German-Slav frontier. By the 1100s, stabilization had given way to wars of expansion and extermination that did not end until 1410, when the Poles crushed the knights of the Teutonic Order at Grunwald in north-central Poland. · As far as the Slavs’ own self-designation goes, its meaning is, understandably, better than “slave”; it comes from the Indo-European root *kleu-, whose basic meaning is “to hear” and occurs in many derivatives meaning “renown, fame.” The Slavs are thus “the famous people.” Slavic names ending in -slav incorporate the same word, such as Czech Bohu-slav, “God’s fame,” Russian Msti-slav, “vengeful fame,” and Polish Stani-slaw, “famous for withstanding (enemies).”

“You made it seem like it was only the Ottomans/Muslims took the Slavic people as slaves en masse”

No I did not. If it “seems” that to you, that is your fault and not mine. For centuries, the Slavic people were enslaved by Muslim barbarians.

Variants of the English word “slave” are used in other languages and come from the word “Slav”.

From Wikipedia:

“The English term slave derives from the ethnonym Slav. In medieval wars many Slavs were captured and enslaved, which led to the word slav becoming synonym to “enslaved person”. In plus, the English word Slav derives from the Middle English word sclave, which was borrowed from Medieval Latin sclavus or slavus, better source needed] itself a borrowing and Byzantine Greek σκλάβος sklábos “slave,” which was in turn apparently derived from a misunderstanding of the Slavic autonym (denoting a speaker of their own languages). The Byzantine term Sklavinoi was loaned into Arabic as Saqaliba (صقالبة; sing. Saqlabi, صقلبي) by medieval Arab historiographers. However, the origin of this word is disputed”.

http://www.kxan.com
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review SANCTIONS totaling over $230,000 against Austin attorney OMAR ROSALES for bad conduct against an opposing lawyer and FABRICATING evidence, among other problems Rosales created while representing one client in hundreds of lawsuits against local businesses for technical violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The $230,000 in sanctions includes $60,500 the U.S. 5th Circuit of Appeals tacked on for FILING A FRIVOLOUS appeal. Rosales cannot appeal the sanctions further, following the Supreme Court’s decision.

ROSALES WAS SUSPENDED FOR THREE YEARS from practicing in the U.S. Western District. He was sanctioned $175,000 in U.S. District Court in Austin for disparaging Austin civil rights attorney Jim Harrington.

The Texas State Bar’s Commission for Lawyer Discipline sued Rosales for a second time in April for violating rules of professional conduct and acting in bad faith.

“I have a question for the writer of this post- how would NXIVM be able to lay claim to Native American land?”

An ex-member made that claim. Perhaps they were thinking if they had enough First Nation members on board, they could make a claim for land. That is certainly retarded. If I’m remembering correctly, I think I may of read something about them trying to do the same thing in Australia. These cult members are MAD.

So, was Russell Means actually there or did “a reader” (who doesn’t appear to claim to have been in attendance) just name drop for funsies? Maybe they meant Russell Crowe (with Vanguard trying to get a center set up in Australia)? Or Russell Brand (b/c Vanguard was working on an anti-addiction “tech” and wanted his endorsement.)

Kristin-Kreuk is a lot like girls such as Selena Gomez and Ariana Grande. Even though they are not children or under the age of consent I look at older guys that say how beautiful they are skeptically. They look very child-like to me. Perverts