Whenever I give a photo set a low rating, it is not a reflection on the model. It is a statement about my feelings about the photographer. Melody is a very beautiful girl, I just wish she could find a real photographer instead of Charles Lightweight!

If you have seen one video, you've seen them all!
I say this, not just about MA, but almost every site to which I have access. The videos are all boring, repetitive, and feature the same thing, over & over.
They all feature a girl rubbing her legs, her breasts, and her body while some innate music thumps in the background.
I have never seen a video that I really liked!

Once again, Albert has wasted our time & band width with a set designed to highlight his "artistry" as opposed to showing the real start of the set, (The model) in her best light. Horrible artistic BS!

Albert lets his ego get in the way of good photography! To me, the photographer is nothing more than a tool. A tool used to group, hopefully well done photographs in a file for posting. They are that, and nothing more.
The model is who and what is important!

My problem with photo artists is when they let their concept of art get in the way of good photography. To me, the photographers are nothing more, and nothing less than tools.
Their function is to get good quality photos of nude women arranged in sets for publication. Beyond that, they don't matter!
I don't even care who they are, I just want good quality nude photos!

I love, and have always loved, Mia Sollis. She is the complete package. Having said that, this photo set leaves a lot to be desired. Why are so many of the sets lately filled with washed out color, bad focus, sun flares around the model. Can all that fake artistry. Give us clean, well focused pictures with good color rendition.

To me, too often, you let your artistry get in the way of good photography. All of the oblique angle shots, the strange color balance, etc. I want good clear pictures of nude women, framed correctly and with good color & contrast. Keep your artistry for somewhere else.

I can count on one hand, the number of frames that I have actually downloaded & saved that were posted by this photographer. I do not understand why MA keeps posting his crap!
A photographer is nothing more, nothing less than a tool! Their concept of art doesn't matter. It is the model that is important.
Who the picture taker is, is irrelevant.

Another Albert Varin waste of bandwidth. I actually find very, very little that he posts, worth the effort to download. I dislike most of his work. This set makes me wish there were negative numbers on the rating scale.

This is the 9th set featuring Lola! None of them are bad. She is one of those young women who could make a pile of junk look good!
Those soulful eyes, that magnificent body and apparent joy she feels when posing, all tend to make me love her!

The argument about shaving or not, is like the argument over tattoos. In reality, it is no one's business but the model herself. Do what I do, if I don't like something about the set, I just don't download it! But shut up about it!

I guess there are some who think a girl covered in sand & gravel is sexy. I don't happen to be one of those. I think a girl covered in sand, gravel or seashells is not good. I find it annoying and distracting.

Dido has an ethereal, timeless quality. She has been active for many years, and has worked with some of the best, on many sites. She is a true professional that no one ever gets tired of seeing. Her sets are always stunning.

If you watch the video on line, it is a different video from the one that downloads! If you stream watch the video it is the one pictured here. If you download and watch the video, it is Yolanda B., Dec 29, 2013.
Get it fixed MetArt!

I have been in absolute addoration of this amazing young woman since I first began following this site & FemJoy, a few years back. She has done amazing posts on both of these truly class sites, and continues to be perhaps the most perfectly proportioned, (natural) beauties on the net. Her demeanor is effervescent in the way she is able to bring a static pose to life. Everything about her, her eyes, her face, her breasts, her legs & feet. She is the total package. "Make me laugh," she says, "And I will love you!"
What a wonderful outlook on life! I love this young woman!

The argument about shaving or not shaving, is like the argument about tattoos. In reality, these things are no business of anyone other than the model herself. Do what I do, if I don't like something in a set, I don't download it...But shut up, mind your own business.

This little rascal has everything that titillates, enhances or triggers the imagination! She is not only petite, but also well endowed and knows how to use it all. Over on FemJoy she is known simply as Nici. Regardless, she is the total package and worth seeing more!

Let me begin by saying, I'm not normally a fan of Deltagamma's work. I don't like the low contrast, distorted colors & black & white frames that are usually part of his posts.
This set blew me away! I loved it and the clear, concise color and contrast that was shown. Good work Deltagamma!

My favorite thing about this magnificent young woman, is the obvious enjoyment she feels from posing. She always seems to be having the time of her life. This job of hers, is evidently not considered a chore. I love seeing her unbridled enthusiasm, seeing her beautiful smile, and adoring her stunning appearances.

Malinda may be one of the cutest little rascals on the internet. It is always obvious that she is having a good time. That is very a very special quality. It is so nice to view a gallery of a beautiful young woman enjoying what she is doing. You are a true marvel Malinda. Here is kudos to both you and Leonardo for an excellent job well done! You both are deserving of a 10!!!!!!!

There is an ethereal, almost childlike innocence that pervades all of the sets featuring Mia C. (Claire on some other sites). Cute is accurate, but it short changes her. She is more than cute…She is a beautiful woman, worthy of praise!

This is the 9th set featuring Lola! None of them are bad. She is one of those young women who could make a pile of junk look good!
Those soulful eyes, that magnificent body and apparent joy she feels when posing, all tend to make me love her!

Not only is Dido stunningly beautiful and talented, she is also tough.
On a site run by Jan Vels, entitled, "Nude in Public," there are several sets with her as the only nude person in a public setting.
Here is where the tough comes in:
On one of the sets, she is nude and barefoot on a frozen lake, where people, who are all bundled up, clear the show from the ice so they can play hockey.
Dido spends the whole time interacting with these people, the only one who is buck naked and barefoot.
That is tough!

I love nude snow scenes. Some of the best have been published here on MA. Jan Vels did several sets with both Gwen A. & Tania G. Both of these wonderful young women frolicked in the snow, naked & bare foot. I've seen Gwen barefoot in snow that was knee deep, and seemingly loving it.
Bring on more snow scenes!

I happen to like Mia's tatoo, and wish it was featured from time to time. It is unique and very artistic. Besides, having or not having a tatoo is a personal choice and no one elses business. It's like the controversy about pubic hair. It is no one's business if a girl shaves or not. Accept what you see, it is not your business. Mia Sollis is one of the most beautiful women I have seen. I have never seen a bad set featuring her. Yes, I would actually like to see some sets where her artistic tatoo is shown.

I have no interest in the picture taker's artistic talent. I have never logged into this site hoping to see a set done by a particular artist. I don't gave a damn who took the pictures. I want straight up, nude women without all of the artistic crap!

Well said! This is glamor photography. Not what one comes to Metart to see. If I want someone to censor what I see I'll buy a copy of Vogue! Her work is R rated at best. If she thinks showing a woman's pussy is nasty why is she here?

I'm just curious now. Every time you comment on a set by Varin, you say almost exactly the same thing "... wasted bandwidth...".

From these many repetitive comments, I take it you don't like (read hate) Varin's work. At least I HOPE that's what you're saying and that you're not saying not only don't you like his work, but you don't like the models he chooses.

You never say "Gee, really pretty girl - nice breasts or legs or rear or whatever but I don't like the way Varin overlights, underexposes, uses odd camera angles..." or a whole host of any other complaints directed towards any particular photographer. You never say "Gee... Varin could'a done this or that" - never anything constructive that Varin might possibly be able to say "Oh... THAT's what the members want to see."

If you don't like his work... do everyone a favor and quit posting time/bandwidth-wasting comments like this. By now, practically everyone knows you don't like him.

The other very reasonable alternative is that if it says "Photographer: Albert Varin" you simply pass the set by.

Your comments on Varin's sets lend absolutely nothing to any possible correction of what you perceive to be the problem with Varin's work.

Sad for you! Only in video can you see all of a model untouched by photoshop. I agree that some videos are boring but the special models like Lorena can only be truly appreciated in a format where we see the real woman and not just poses doctored to look perfect.

I think the folks that can't see the poor photography must have crappy monitors. Very grainy and flat. You can shoot into the light and obtain good photos if you know the proper techniques. You are correct in that the good sets that come from those two are the exception (occasionally it does happen).

You´ve got to be more specific,bro.Otherwise Varin will leave Varin County,a place of his own where he permanently resides and jump into action,whining,weeping and crying.He Works until he aches his bones,so how in the world could anybody criticize him?
Sniff.Varin counterintelligence

semajw... doesn't it get rather monotonous and mundane to you after awhile? Seriously... when you meet a girl in real life it's only very rarely that you meet her totally naked after all. At least, in my experience, it has only been very rarely that I meet a brand new girl entirely naked right from the first. (;

I find the process of her undressing and showing me gradually what lies under those pretty clothes rather sexy and a big part of the pleasure of her getting naked in the first place.

I like the MA photogs to replicate that exquisite tease, that lovely pleasure here in their photosets... (:

ON that day 9 years ago Erro attached the following "Bio", the fact is what it said is directly related to you post:
"Dido has a little secret. Sometimes I like to be naked. Well we are all for that. No, I mean naked in places I am not supposed to be naked at. Like in the park or at the mall or at the beach. I find little hiding places, places where no one can see me and I pull my skirt up or my top off and I am naked just for the thrill of it, to see if I can get away with it. She blushes, One day I will get caught but it makes me feel so alive to do, I love it! So keep an eye out at local parks and malls guys, you never know where you might see Dido."

You clearly do not know how MetArt works. Nalina was not "stuck" with Catherine. She was not assigned to work this Catherine. Catherine found her, hired her, booked a session with her, paid her and created the galleries (probably more than one). We probably would have never met Nalina without Catherine. Nalina is probably an 18 year old college freshman or sophomore. My guess is that she never thought of modeling until she met Catherine.

Charles is a fine photographer, for a Playboy or a Maxim. Personally I don't think he's explicit enough for this site, BUT I do agree that he's a great photographer. What he does, he does very well, it's just that it inevitably frustrates and annoys me.

I believe it is the right of any of us to state our desires and preference, as long as respectfully done. Of course it's the model's right to choose whether to shave or not. But they may want feedback to know what the majority wants that may also determine their ratings. I stated I prefer trimmed, but respect other views.

It is perfectly understandable for her fans (I'm definitely one) to note that she decided to shave when many if not most of her previous sets are either fully natural or trimmed. I personally feel that her set "Pieno" is about as perfect a set as they come.

Having been around for a long time and watched the tattoo craze go from an occasional rose or some other nicely placed and feminine decoration to full sleeves, legs, hands and worse with sculls and demons and all sorts of blood and guts I am very glad Met has this rule. It was done to keep Met a class site about beautiful classy women. You have to draw the line somewhere and I am just fine with the rules the way they are. One mans art is another mans trash and who is going to be the judge of what is ok and what is not. If they did take there would be all sorts of pissing matches over why this when you show that etc. Much easier to say no and allow an occasional small tat to slip through. If you want tats go to a tat site. Heaven knows there are plenty of them out there.

All naked all the time is what is boring... frilly undies on a pretty girl are bewitching and naughty and fun, especially when first viewed under a flouncy skirt, then removed ~ before the skirt ~ and then what's underneath the undies is viewed again under the skirt. Yummmm! Much better than all naked all the time.

Yes ... they're a bit too tall (in my humble opinion) for Jeff but they're not garish colored, they don't have any outlandish ornamentation on them and they don't have clear, see-through heels with goldfish swimming in them - but I don't think you could properly call them "Frankenshoes".

This site is called MetART for a reason! I would call it artistic, not 'artsy'. What I love is the variety of different styles we see here. I think Paromov's work is really distinctive, and that's what I enjoy... But, I get that not everyone likes it... as we always say here, "to each his or her own" :-)

No way! This was a good one! I rated it a "10." I know what you mean, though. I have had issues with many MetArt videos that never get to the point, in other words, never showing nice pussy. I mean, you can see pretty faces in other places, but we come here to see attractive, NAKED young ladies, right?

Sometimes, the MetArt videos do show you something, but then jump around and give you whiplash, or take so long to get to the point that you just about fall asleep waiting and then it's over if you blink.

I loved how this vid slowed down and focused on the money shot, so to speak. I know money shots mean something else on raunchy porn sites, but that's why I am here, and not there.

The only thing that seemed a bit contrived to me was how studiously Katherine had to avoid ever touching her own pussy. I guess she and Mr. Clemens have to adhere to the rules. Sigh... do you think those will ever change? Other than that, this video was perfect. I love Katherine, think she has a perfect body, and was captured nicely here in a POV that I can only wish to experience in person. Good job!!

Let's see now:semajw4 months ago:
It is my belief that Deltagama is far too enamored with his own artistry. It gets in the way of good photography.
Saturday, January 10th, 2015 on Edrom
semajw4 months ago:
IMO The photographer became too impressed with his own artistry and let it get in the way of good photography.
Wednesday, January 7th, 2015 on Autare (By Albert Varin)
semajw5 months ago:
This set made me wish the ratings system had negative numbers. I would have loved to give it a negative 10.
Sunday, December 14th, 2014 on Dyuti (By Alex Lynn)
semajw6 months ago:
This entire set was crap!
Friday, November 21st, 2014 on Elisia (By Rylsky)
semajw10 months ago:
Wonderful, exotic Asian beauty, painfully photographed again! I wish this beauty would find another photographer.
Sunday, August 3rd, 2014 on Luogo (By Catherine)
semajw10 months ago:
Beautiful girl, horrible photography!
Thursday, July 17th, 2014 on Anarti (by Matiss)
semajw10 months ago:
Saturday, May 24th, 2014 on Bicinadane B (By Catherine)
To me, it is no wonder that this lovely woman never came back for another set. This has to be the single worst example of nude are photography I have ever seen. It's too bad she never had the chance to work with a real photographer.
Saturday, July 12th, 2014 on Carolisemajw12 months ago:
Artistic bullshit! (By Alex Iskan)
semajw1 year ago:
I found this girl on thenude.eu website and had high hopes. Then I would learn she has only worked with Slastyonoff. Too bad she never worked for a photographer!
Friday, May 2nd, 2014 on Cathartic
semajw1 year ago:
No wonder this beautiful young woman hasn't been back since this set was posted!
She probably is thinking, if that is the kind of crap they are going to post, I don't want any more of it!
Friday, February 28th, 2014 on Lamia (This the last set posted of Lada her 20th and across the family proably her 50th.)
semajw1 year ago:
I think Matiss is a hack!
Friday, February 21st, 2014 on Arsetu
semajw1 year ago:
Pitiful lighting, and I don't like hair!
Monday, January 27th, 2014 on Maituse (Talk to Ying Yang)
semajw1 year ago:
Oh shit! Not Ryslky!
Thursday, November 28th, 2013 on Nahibi

And finally to quore the leared semajw from two years ago:
semajw2 years ago:
What a tasteless comment! Didn't your mother tell you, "If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all!"
It's different if you're talking about the content, but your remarks are personal, hurtful, and wrong!

I guess that applies to everyone but him. By semajw1 criteria Delta seems to be in very good company competing for his worst....

You're kidding. None of our business? In this business of showing pussies et al?
Besides you'll note there's a comment section here, asking us what we think :-))
You may be happy with nothing but shaven, but I am not. And I will let them know that :-) ☮

Then why look at the "artistic crap" ? Why not stop looking when you reach the end of the standard set? Davi isn't one of the photogs who distributes his B&W and desats among the "standard" photos like other photogs, he always puts them AFTER the standard shots. I don't see why you need to complain about that, since with Davi you always get a full standard set of regular color photos to enjoy.

The B&W and desats aren't until after the standard set of 120+ photos, semajw... they are EXTRAs. They are free bonuses. If you don't like B&W and desats (and generally, I don't myself) then just stop at the end of the standard set. Problem solved. ( :

Black & white, color filters, oblique framing, are all part of history of photography.
So what do you mean for "good photography"?
Maybe your own, personal, subjective idea of photography?
So that's ok, but then you should better say that "the photographer lets his art get in the way of the photography I prefer", that would be more correct and acceptable.

I wholeheartedly disagree. I would agree if you said this about Paromov, but certainly not DeltaGamma. He would be among the least of all the Met photogs to put conceited artistry ahead of quality photography, IMO. There is a lot of good photography in this and other sets he has shot in honest down-to-earth style.

If there is a specific issue, for God's sake air your grievance so it can be heard and addressed. Davi listens, That tells me he cares. Many of your "artsy" types of photogs do not listen nor do they join us in meaningful discussion.

Do you have a specific example of how this process/phenomenon occurs, semajw, or are you just blowing off hot air? If you don't give any specifics of what you mean, your comment is not useful... Davi cannot learn anything from it.

semajw, I don't know if this impression comes from the number of pics of the set or from elsewhere, but I can tell you that you're far from the truth, I am not too enamored of my artistry/work, on the contrary, if you see through my other sets and read my comments you will see that I have declared several times that I wish to improve and get better and better, also with the help of constructive criticism. That's why I prefer comments where the reasons of satisfaction or dissatisfaction are explained, so that I can understand, otherwise it's just a totally subjective/biased/personal opinion.

This is a very real case of "damned if they do, damned if they don't," semajw, because there are some of us who really love it when models wear sexy high heels in the sets, and there are those like you who prefer them not to. So whatever Davi and his model do, someone's going to complain! ( :

Taken in isolation, I would agree, stipulating however that it is an artists' license to emphasize which features he wishes on his model.
However, these photos are not in isolation, they are part of an erotic photoset. Really, that fact speaks for itself, IMO.
Not everyone's erotic sensibilities match up with everyone else's...