Our six-university project launched its final research findings at Westminster on 22 May. A packed audience of parliamentarians and their researchers, representatives from leading campaign organisations and policy influencers heard the project’s verdict that conditionality in the welfare system is largely ineffective in getting people into the paid labour market. The event was hosted by York Central MP Rachael Maskell (pictured right) who promised to use the findings in parliament.

The findings and calls for a rebalancing of sanctions and support, review of the system and ending of benefit sanctions for disabled and vulnerable people were well received on the day and subsequently.

Several blogs including one by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s Chris Goulden followed. A major statement by the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies, representing the UK and Ireland’s five leading professional associations for psychological therapies, reaffirmed BABCT’s opposition to benefit sanctions, based on the project’s evidence.

The findings publications drew 11,000 views to the project’s website, with over 100,000 tweet ‘impressions’ and 50 new newsletter subscribers.

Professor Dwyer and team members Dr Sharon Wright (University of Glasgow) and Dr Lisa Scullion (University of Salford) have submitted evidence based on the project’s findings to the Commons Work and Pensions Committee’s inquiry into benefit sanctions.

This month WelCond will host a major international conference on welfare conditionality, at the University of York. The event has attracted more than 80 academic papers and more than 100 delegates from across the world.

The York team will build on the tremendous impact of the findings through the remainder of the year by meeting key policy and other stakeholder contacts to discuss the project recommendations.

Professor Dwyer commented: ‘The team will be involved in a series of events and meetings in the coming weeks and months. We will be attempting to ensure that policymakers are aware of our important findings in relation to welfare conditionality and its limited effects in moving people into work – alongside more negative outcomes including counterproductive compliance and increased poverty. These actually get in the way of effective engagement with paid work.’