Choose Your Own Auditing Adventure

Compliance audits are a tool commonly employed by EHS managers to evaluate the effectiveness of their programs in meeting national, regional, and local regulatory requirements. Comprehensive audits will present not only findings, but also root causes and corrective actions. Based on internal capabilities and the reality of EHS budgets, companies can decide whether external consultants will play a role in executing audit programs.

When considering an audit program, the ideal solution for your business should:

Be easy-to-implement, cost-effective, efficient, and adaptable to the varying needs of each part of the organization;

Be supported by comprehensive and applicable audit protocols;

Track and manage findings and corrective actions to closure; and

Provide configurable reports on audit results.

Benefits of a solid program include being able to compare auditing results from multiple locations (even across different countries), managers getting a real-time view of audit results, the ability to control timing and predict costs accurately, and a repeatable and sustainable process. Compliance becomes part of your culture, and improvement from year to year and audit to audit becomes measurable. In short, better input gets you better output.

So how do you get there? With so many factors to consider, what approach works best for your organization? To help, Antea Group has developed a matrix of audit team concepts for use in determining the best approach for your audit program.

Pure Internal:

Your internal audit team does not include consultants—instead, subject matter experts with company‐specific knowledge provide detailed audit coverage. Costs typically fall back to the facility or business unit EHS budget unless compensated by corporate.

Disadvantages include the absence of consultants who can bring industry experience from outside your firm (potentially from your peers) and the fact that you may bear the cost of training internal resources.

Hybrid, Internally Lead:

The hybrid audit structure includes both internal team members and external consultants and is led by an internal company audit leader. Advantages to this structure include high quality coverage of the audit topics by internal and external subject matter experts (SMEs), opportunities to obtain audit training experience for internal site‐level staff, and flexibility in selecting specialty auditor topic coverage (since consultants create a deeper auditor pool).

Disadvantages may include moderate commitment of internal resources (site level personnel hours and travel costs), a higher commitment of corporate EHS to having audit managers pulled off of other activities, moderate consultant costs, and some discontinuity in writing style in the delivery of the findings.

Hybrid, Externally Lead:

The consultant‐led hybrid audit structure includes both internal and consultant team members but is led by an external consultant audit leader. Advantages and disadvantages are similar to the internally led hybrid structure. The consultant‐led hybrid audit may be easier to implement in some cases, as it decreases the corporate time commitment to auditing.

Pure External:

The external auditor structure consists of a team solely made up of consultant auditors. A corporate representative may be present to serve as a facilitator/moderator to represent the audit program. Advantages include detailed coverage of the audit topics by SMEs that have experience from outside the company culture.

External costs for labor and travel, while highest of these options, is well‐defined prior to the audit. Because the corporate representative is the sole internal attendee, this audit structure risks the loss of company institutional knowledge (e.g., knowing 'this is how we solved the issue at the other plant.').

Conclusion

By considering your corporate culture and time, money, and resource availability, you should be able to determine which approach might work best for your needs. Consider as well the geography of your facilities (are they spread across different states or countries, with different regulatory environments?) and the depth of knowledge and experience your internal team possesses. Any one of these approaches can produce great results—the critical step is just making sure your approach matches up with your needs.

Related articles

Enhesa and Enablon examine the need for and best practice approach to, managing EHS compliance globally.
In a joint publication available for free download, Enhesa and Enablon have joined forces to highlight why global companies need to take a global approach to ensuring they comply with EHS laws wherever they operate.
Entitled “Implementing a Global Approach to Managing EHS Regulatory Compliance” the White Paper examines
The global challenge of complying with EHS laws
The Consequences of Not...

It comes as no surprise that one of the key challenges that our frequent surveys of corporate EHS directors highlights is “language”. Language and communication (signs, signals, warnings, labels) are of course one of the most critical aspects of any EHS program. Without clear information, instructions and reminders to employees and visitors, risks are increased or even ignored.
There are a whole host of anecdotes than can be drawn upon to highlight this. I have heard (unconfirmed) reports of...

Drawing on her extensive experience in auditing sites across many different industries and jurisdictions our Expert Services Manager, Sarah Toussaint, provides her key tips for making EHS compliance audits a success.
Question: What makes a successful compliance audit?
Answer: Meticulous planning.
The success of an EHS compliance audit is dependent on ensuring it is properly planned to have minimal disruption to production whilst ensuring the audit team can achieve the audit objectives. A poorly planned audit...

While wearing my audit manager hat, I need to consider the culture of the jurisdiction in which I am compiling an audit team.
Perhaps, in that jurisdiction, a woman cannot be a lead auditor.
Perhaps, a woman may not be comfortable staying in the local motel.
While wearing my auditor hat, I am often confronted with the fact that I am a woman, and a young woman at that.
Like any other profession, auditing is growing and the role gender plays in it is becoming more apparent.As an audit manager and female...

From unique regulations to cultural nuances to lack of local expertise, companies often face a number of environmental, health and safety (EHS) challenges when operating or expanding their businesses into other countries. But the good news is that while these challenges can be difficult to navigate, this challenge can be overcome.
Discover how five global companies overcame difficult EHS challenges with the help of Antea Group and our global partners.
Challenge 1: Lack of technology and local support
A specialty...

Customer comments

No comments were found for Choose Your Own Auditing Adventure. Be the first to comment!

Add your comment

Great! comment successfully added!

Contact

Your message:

Your email

Your first name

Your last name

I would like to receive periodic email updates and special offers from select suppliers.