This copy is for your personal non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies of Toronto Star content for distribution to colleagues, clients or customers, or inquire about permissions/licensing, please go to: www.TorontoStarReprints.com

Guns are now responsible for the largest share of U.S. homicides in more than 80 years: federal data analysis

By Christopher IngrahamThe Washington Post

Mon., April 2, 2018

The much-discussed spike in homicide rates between 2014 and 2016 is due almost entirely to gun homicides, an analysis of federal homicide data reveals.

The spike was so drastic that in 2016, gun homicides accounted for a greater share of all homicides than at any point in the federal record, which contains more than 80 years of complete data for the United States.

Rallies calling attention to gun violence have become more prevalent across the United States since the Parkland school shooting. An analysis of federal data underscore how the violent crime problem in the U.S. is, now more than ever, a gun violence problem. (Scott Olson / GETTY IMAGES file photo)

The numbers underscore how the violent crime problem in the U.S. is, now more than ever, a gun violence problem. After years of record sales, firearms are now more prevalent in society than at any time in recent history. The high number of civilian guns in circulation means more opportunities for guns to be diverted into the hands of people at risk of harming others with them, potentially altering the landscape of American crime.

To arrive at the numbers above, the Washington Post compiled more than 100 years of federal homicide statistics, stretching back to the year 1910. These figures are collected by the CDC as part of the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS), which compiles mortality data — including data on homicides — each year via death certificates. Note that in the years before 1933, the NVSS did not collect death certificate data for all states. The share of the total population covered in the pre-1933 data ranges from 51 per cent in 1910 to 95 per cent in 1932.

Historically, gun homicides have accounted for a little over 60 per cent of total homicides. But that ratio hasn’t always been constant. In tracking the raw numbers of gun and non-gun homicides going back to 1910, the numbers aren’t adjusted for population, because we’re interested primarily in looking at the relationship between the two, rather than their relationship to the total population.

The data show that gun homicides have always surpassed homicides by other means — stabbing, strangulation, etc. — in number. In some years, like in the 40s and 50s, this gap is fairly small (note also the spike in non-gun homicides in 2001, the year of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks). But in other periods, like the 20s, 30s, and the latter half of the 20th century, the number of gun homicides soars relative to the number of other homicides.

Particularly interesting is what’s happening in the present day. Since 2014, the number of non-gun homicides rose by less than two per cent, from 4,864 in 2014 to 4,947 in 2016. But during those same two years the number of gun homicides rose by more than 30 per cent, from 11,000 to well over 14,000.

Put another way, guns alone accounted for nearly 98 per cent of the observed homicide rate increase between 2014 and 2016. All told, in 2016 gun homicides made up 74.5 per cent of all homicides in the United States — the highest share in well over 80 years of complete federal data.

Article Continued Below

Guns’ share of total homicides has surpassed 70 per cent only twice before in the past century — in the early 1920s, at the start of Prohibition (when the federal data covered about 80 per cent of the population), and in the early 1990s at the peak of that decade’s crime wave. During both of those eras, the total homicide rate approached 10 deaths per 100,000 or more. The current spike in gun homicides relative to other homicides is unique, in that it’s happening during a period of relatively low homicide rates (6 per 100,000) overall.

It’s difficult to ascertain what, exactly, the jump in the share of gun homicides says about our present moment. At the household level, surveys show that rates of gun ownership have either remained relatively stable in recent years or declined slightly, depending on the data source.

However, there is widespread agreement that the total number of civilian firearms in circulation has recently skyrocketed, particularly during the Obama administration. The great proliferation of firearms means that more guns are being diverted from legitimate uses and onto the black market, where they end up in the hands of individuals who may otherwise be prohibited from owning them.

Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court for The New York Times, explains what he calls “the most cryptic part of the United States Constitution.” (The New York Times)

Regardless, the data above show that since the early 1990s, non-gun homicides have seen a steady decline in terms of both raw numbers and rates, with the exception of the Sept. 11 attacks. Gun homicides, however, have been much more volatile, with several periods of increase and decrease.

The spike in gun homicides in the last two years could simply be a more extreme case of that volatility. Or, it could be an inflection point, indicating that firearms have become so numerous in society that they’re now more readily available than ever to individuals wishing to do ill with them. If that’s the case, we might expect to see gun homicides continue to increase even as other forms of homicide become more rare.

More from The Star & Partners

LOADING

Copyright owned or licensed by Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or distribution of this content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited and/or its licensors. To order copies of Toronto Star articles, please go to: www.TorontoStarReprints.com