A public school closes if enrollment falls below 350. But more than 70% of charter schools have less than 350 students, and some have less than 50 students, and they are not on the chopping block. Why the double standard?

She writes:

“There are many parents who are attracted to charter schools precisely because of their small size. They feel that not only is it safer, but that their children will be in a school where they will get more individualized attention. Since all of the schools on the proposed closure list have a large percentage of high needs students, doesn’t it make sense that these schools remain small learning environments that can offer class sizes of 12 to 15 students? This would not only attract families, it would dramatically improve the teachers’ ability to effectively address the needs of all students.”

Share this:

Like this:

Related

9 CommentsComments are closed.

Kaya Henderson has made her final decision, 15 schools will close 5 less then originally proposed. The 2 schools in the more affluent Ward of the city have come off, the remaining schools to be closed are in neighborhoods with higher percentages of African-Americans and with higher percentages of people living in poverty. These closures are unjust and discriminatory. One of the schools that will remain open is going to be co-located with a “high performing charter” which the chancellor will not name at this time. City residents who are unhappy with these decisions plan on rallying at her home tonight!

If the overall school capacity is being shifted geographically away from the gegraphical nexus of the poor people, that sounds like discimination. They will be burdened with more travel time to go to school.

No amount of gibberish will dispute the fact that public schools could also have smaller class sizes.

The primary difference between the business model, as implemented in public education, and real world markets is that corporate sponsored “reformers” who are leading the public schools, such as those in mayoral controlled cities, have no intention of competing against charter schools. Instead, they serve as advertisers for “the competition”. They are like McDonald’s throwing in the towel and telling customers, “Here’s a coupon for Wendy’s. Their food tastes much better than ours and we can’t improve our product.”

If that isn’t the signal of a “Going Out of Business Sale,” I don’t know what is.

Chicago will not be shutting down very many public high schools because students might have to travel further in crime ridden portions of the city and could get killed. Better to leave them in poor school settings than to risk them having to walk the streets of Chicago.

“risk them having to walk the streets of Chicago” in their highly segregated low-income neighborhoods on the South Side and the West Side.

I live in an integrated middle income neighborhood and students don’t face the same high risks traveling to my area high school as those kids do. But nearly all of the schools slated for closure have been and continue to be on the South Side and West Side. And that’s just next years’ closings –the moratorium does not negate the possibility of closing more schools with low test scores. Yet, there are no plans to provide the needed resources that might help under-resourced schools succeed nor programs for mediating out-of-school factors.