A treaty cannot take away a Constitutional right like the Second Amendment.

Article VI of the US Constitution: The Supremecy ClauseThis Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution trumps treaties:
“The treaty is ... a law made by the proper authority, and the courts of justice have no right to annul or disregard any of its provisions, unless they violate the Constitution of the United States.” Doe v. Braden, 57 U.S. (16 How.) 635, 656 (1853). “It need hardly be said that a treaty cannot change the Constitution or be held valid if it be in violation of that instrument.” The Cherokee Tobacco, 78 U.S. (11 Wall.), 616, 620 (1871).
See Also:http://www.un.org/events/smallarms20...rdStraight.pdf

sadly congress does believe it can take away a constitutional right. Because we are part of the UN. Though reading nra's truth fact on this,they say it will stop imported guns and ammunition. I dont know which is true, but the day they said how many guns I can buy, making me register or pay taxed on then they pissed on the constitution.

sadly congress does believe it can take away a constitutional right. Because we are part of the UN. Though reading nra's truth fact on this,they say it will stop imported guns and ammunition. I dont know which is true, but the day they said how many guns I can buy, making me register or pay taxed on then they pissed on the constitution.

I think you're right; Congress is the body best positioned to take away our gun rights. I'm pretty sure they would need to amend the Constitution to do it, and a Constitutional Amendmend is a tall order. The last time an amendment was passed from start to finish was 1971 when the 26th Amendment gave the vote to 18 year olds. That amendment passed in record time, four months from proposal in the House to ratification by 3/4's of the states. The 26th Amendment had huge public support because 18 year olds were being sent to Viet Nam, but they couldn't vote. If they try to amend away gun rights I expect they would get some push back especially from the western & southern states.

I think you're right; Congress is the body best positioned to take away our gun rights. I'm pretty sure they would need to amend the Constitution to do it, and a Constitutional Amendmend is a tall order. The last time an amendment was passed from start to finish was 1971 when the 26th Amendment gave the vote to 18 year olds. That amendment passed in record time, four months from proposal in the House to ratification by 3/4's of the states. The 26th Amendment had huge public support because 18 year olds were being sent to Viet Nam, but they couldn't vote. If they try to amend away gun rights I expect they would get some push back especially from the western & southern states.

What was your voting age before this amendment? As far back as I can remember, here in Canada it has always been 18. It does seem unjust that you can send a young man to war, but give him no say in his country. We have similar nonsense here: a 17 year old can join our military but he cannot touch alcohol until he is 19.