The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) is Australia's national transport safety investigator. The ATSB's function is to improve safety and public confidence in the aviation, marine and rail modes of transport. The ATSB is Australia's prime agency for the independent investigation of civil aviation, rail and maritime accidents, incidents and safety deficiencies.

On 28 February 2015, at about 1232 Eastern Standard Time, an Enstrom 280 helicopter, registered VH-YHD, departed from Caloundra Airport, for a flight to Redcliffe Airport, Queensland, the pilot was the only person on board.

After about half an hour, the pilot commenced a descent from 1,500 ft above ground level (AGL). The pilot then broadcast on the Redcliffe common traffic advisory frequency that YHD would join the Redcliffe circuit in about 6 minutes. They navigated along the coastline toward Redcliffe.

At about 1,000 ft AGL, the pilot heard a bang and the engine stopped. This caused the helicopter to yaw to the left violently. The pilot then attempted to restart the engine but was unsuccessful. At about 800 ft AGL, the helicopter entered autorotation and the pilot prepared to land on the beach. The pilot observed people swimming in the sea and manoeuvred the helicopter to an area where there were no people. The pilot arrested the descent and the skids contacted the sand. The helicopter continued to move forward along the sand, and then a few seconds later the helicopter blades impacted the sand. The pilot received minor injuries and the helicopter was destroyed.

When planning a particular flight it is important for pilots to consider options and risk. In this accident, the pilot opted to follow the coastline, allowing for the option to land on the beach. The pilot in the pre-flight planning identified the hazard (flying over water) and although the likelihood of an engine failure was low, the consequences were high and made the decision to follow the coastline to mitigate the risk. If the pilot had selected the option to fly the most direct path, the engine would have failed over the water.

Read report

What happened

On 28 February 2015, at about 1232 Eastern Standard Time (EST), an Enstrom 280 helicopter, registered VH-YHD (YHD), departed from Caloundra Airport, for a flight to Redcliffe Airport, Queensland, with the pilot, who was the only person on board.

After about half an hour, the pilot commenced a descent from 1,500 ft above ground level (AGL). The pilot then broadcast on the Redcliffe common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) that YHD would join the Redcliffe circuit in about 6 minutes and navigated along the coastline toward Redcliffe.

At about 1,000 ft AGL, the pilot heard a bang and the engine stopped. This caused the helicopter to yaw to the left violently. The pilot then attempted to restart the engine but was unsuccessful. At about 800 ft AGL, the helicopter entered autorotation[1] and the pilot prepared to land on the beach. The pilot observed people swimming in the sea and manoeuvred the helicopter to an area where there were no people. The pilot arrested the descent and the skids contacted the sand. The helicopter continued to move forward along the sand, and then a few seconds later the helicopter blades impacted the sand, and the helicopter rolled over. The pilot received minor injuries and the helicopter was destroyed (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Accident site showing the damage to VH-YHD

Source: Queensland police

Witness

A witness to the accident reported that the helicopter was first sighted at about 100 m above the ground, descending and approaching from the north. The only noise was from the rotor blades, with no engine sound. The witness reported that the wind was quite strong coming from the east. A stronger easterly gust came when the helicopter was close to the ground. The helicopter landed and continued to move forward, but then flipped upside down and the rotor blades contacted the sand. The helicopter came to rest about 150 m from where the witness was located. A passer-by assisted the pilot to exit the helicopter.

Pilot comment

The pilot provided the following comments:

This was the first flight after the completion of the periodic (100 hourly or 12-month) maintenance inspection.

The helicopter operated normally during the engine run-up checks and the flight, up to the engine failure.

The pilot commented not to delay in lowering the collective[2] and setting the airspeed as everything happened very quickly after the engine failed and the pilot instinctively conducted an autorotation.

The landing was smooth with no bump.

The weather was fine with a slight breeze from the north-east and the wind speed at Caloundra was about 10 kt.

Rather than fly direct to Redcliff airport the pilot had selected to fly along the shoreline. If YHD had flown direct to Redcliff then the engine may have failed over Deception Bay and YHD may have landed in the water.

The pilot stated that the number of flight hours experience on the helicopter type was about 60, with about eight flight hours on the type in the 90 days prior.

Helicopter maintenance

The helicopter engine was overhauled and installed in YHD in April 2006. At the time of the accident, the engine had completed about 146 hours since overhaul. The periodic (100 hourly or 12-month) maintenance inspection included overhaul of the engine magneto.

Maintenance organisation investigation

The maintenance organisation inspected the engine externally and removed the number three cylinder. They determined that the damage found to the number three cylinder and piston (Figure 2) was consistent with detonation. Extreme heat from uncontrolled burning of the combustion gases resulted in melting of the cylinder between the spark plug hole and the exhaust valve seat. This melting damaged the piston to an extent that the combustion gases would blow past the piston rings. The maintenance organisation did not remove the other cylinders.

The maintenance organisation also removed the engine magneto and fuel control unit. Both units were examined at a component overhaul facility. The examination of the magneto found no defects. The examination of the fuel control unit found that it was functioning normally and was set to a lean position, although this position could not be validated due to disruption during the accident.

Safety message

When planning a particular flight it is important for pilots to consider options and risk. In this accident, the pilot opted to follow the coastline, allowing for the option to land on the beach. The pilot in the pre-flight planning identified the hazard (flying over water) and although the likelihood of an engine failure was low, the consequences were high and made the decision to follow the coastline to mitigate the risk. If the pilot had selected the option to fly the most direct path then the engine would have failed over the water.

To download an image click the download link then right-click the image and select save image as.

Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly.