http://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/dr-conquitte
Hello, if anyone could read what I have so far (which is a very early draft, so please do not think I am near completion) and give me some advice or tell me what's wrong with what I have, I'd be very grateful. I'm mainly dissatisfied with my wording, and if anyone could help with that in particular I'd appreciate it greatly.

Note: I correct the given mistake only once. If you do not use the metric system, I will only make a single comment about it, even if it appears again in the rest of the article. If the draft has many language problems, I will only correct the most glaring ones. Unnecessary information will show as the copied text with the redundant information stricken through.

Measurements shouldn't be included unless they are essential to containment. E.g., it's okay to say 'standard' and you don't need to include the measurements at all, as that can actually cause more trouble and questions more often than not.

The single public path to SCP-XXXX has been redirected towards the nearby city of ████████.

Don't censor information in the Special Containment Procedures. Think about it: In-universe, this doesn't make sense because if I'm supposed to learn how to contain something successfully, I need to have complete information.

SCP-XXXX is a 63 m long cave located approximately 6 km northeast of the ████████ River located in the ████████ Province of █████████ which has memetic effects on those with naive-type and curious-type mindsets within a 59 m distance to SCP-XXXX.

This isn't very well defined. What does ''naive-type'' and ''curious-type'' mean here?

Author, apart from the somewhat unique setting, this is a pretty standard ''things that makes you kill yourself/makes you insane'' that gets posted to the wiki and subsequently deleted a lot, sometimes daily.

Firstly, this object sounds like a compulsion object. The problem with compulsion object is it has been done to death by this point. It doesn't mean it can be never done again, but it's generally considered much more scary the things people choose to do, not the things they're forced to do.

It seems like you've chosen to write this SCP to primarily be the most dangerous object it can possibly be, which overtakes the narrative with 'look how dangerous this thing is!'. After reading your draft here, I get the feeling that you're just trying to create a dangerous object, not a SCP with an interesting narrative. All the and details of how much it kills people overtakes any narrative you're trying to give us.

I recommend getting the base idea polished up in the Ideas and Brainstorming forum before you try fixing the draft. Go to that forum, post a quick summary of the concept you want to write up (don't link the draft unless someone asks), and reviewers there can help you make the idea more interesting and give you some advice on structuring the eventual article for smoothness of reading and narrative.

Thank you so much! After reading this some new ideas have popped into my head, but I'll wait and sift them around until they're really good. I'll take your advice, as well. When writing this, honestly I wasn't focusing on making this dangerous! I had the loose idea of "an ominous cave that seeks out the curious and leads them to failure." Which now I realize can be further expanded upon a good bit. Again, thank you!