Guido> *If* we're going for an even/odd scheme, I wouldn't want to swap
Guido> the Linux convention, so 2.2 would have to be stable, and 2.3
Guido> experimental.
Yeah, I'd tend to agree. For one thing, all the Linux distributions are
used to the Linux even-odd convention. Not confusing them would probably be
a good thing. (Hey, how about we skip 2.3 altogether and get in complete
version sync with Linux? Maybe we could even convince Linus to do our
releases for us. :-)
Guido> Maybe I should PEP it first? :-)
You've got a smiley there, but some things will obviously have to change
about the way releases are managed, so a PEP might not be a bad idea. Has
Jack chimed in on this thread from the Mac quarter? Tim, can Windows
installers be created by other people?
Skip