WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have
preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken.
The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at
http://lists.xen.org/

Chris Wright wrote:
> * Chris Wright (chrisw@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
>> * Nakajima, Jun (jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>>> Good progress and good start, i.e. we have at least one virutal
>>> processor there :-).
>>>
>>> We'll look at the problem too.
>>
>> Great, thanks. I'm pretty suspect of the gdt, but only on a hunch.
>> Any clues why the copy is faulting might be useful.
>
> Here's an updated patch that fixes that faulting. It uses gdt per
> page like i386 is doing, still crashing upon schedule. Why does each
> gdt entry need it's own page?
>
> thanks,
> -chris
Each gdt entry? I think gdt should be per vcpu, but I don't understand
"each gdt entry". Can you please point to the code you are talking
about?
Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel