Perspectives for Forensic Intelligence in anti-doping: Thinking outside of the box.

Details

Perspectives for Forensic Intelligence in anti-doping: Thinking outside of the box.

Journal

Forensic Science International

Author(s)

MarclayF., ManginP., MargotP., SaugyM.

ISSN

1872-6283 (Electronic)

ISSN-L

0379-0738

Publication state

Published

Issued date

2013

Volume

229

Number

1-3

Pages

133-144

Language

english

Notes

Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish

Abstract

Today's approach to anti-doping is mostly centered on the judicial process, despite pursuing a further goal in the detection, reduction, solving and/or prevention of doping. Similarly to decision-making in the area of law enforcement feeding on Forensic Intelligence, anti-doping might significantly benefit from a more extensive gathering of knowledge. Forensic Intelligence might bring a broader logical dimension to the interpretation of data on doping activities for a more future-oriented and comprehensive approach instead of the traditional case-based and reactive process. Information coming from a variety of sources related to doping, whether directly or potentially, would feed an organized memory to provide real time intelligence on the size, seriousness and evolution of the phenomenon. Due to the complexity of doping, integrating analytical chemical results and longitudinal monitoring of biomarkers with physiological, epidemiological, sociological or circumstantial information might provide a logical framework enabling fit for purpose decision-making. Therefore, Anti-Doping Intelligence might prove efficient at providing a more proactive response to any potential or emerging doping phenomenon or to address existing problems with innovative actions or/and policies. This approach might prove useful to detect, neutralize, disrupt and/or prevent organized doping or the trafficking of doping agents, as well as helping to refine the targeting of athletes or teams. In addition, such an intelligence-led methodology would serve to address doping offenses in the absence of adverse analytical chemical evidence.