Yes but it was predominately black with like 3 whiteys spread in there. The problem is you said though implying they make jook's actions less then what they are. If Jook helps one lost black boy each time he volunteers, did he not help the black community?

I was in Iraq for 15 mos. I'm sure some of the people I detained ended up there. Weren't one of them innocent.

There is a difference between watching shit on the news/media/for profit sources and actually being there.

Keep sitting in the computer chair in the comforts of your warm home talking about shit you have no clue about you revolutionary.

Click to expand...

You were there for 15 months, and in which position of administrative authority over operations were you to have full knowledge and overview over the full purpose and scope of activity?

I'm sure you arrested someone "guilty". This does not give you overview or insight into all detainees of GB's situations or reasons. Many weren't even detained in Iraq. Which btw, was an illegal invasion.

If any of you think doing illegal operations in the name of imperialism (PNAC, CFR among things) is being "good" to the world, while the american example is corruption, exploitation and environmental destruction, then you are out of your minds.

And since when weren't americans killing 100 x thousands of innocent civillians? No, there's no difference between hitting strategic targets in NY and in Afghanistan, in any case, targets and killings by US forces in the middle east are way less calculated in terms of strategic conflict.

Since when did rules apply to others and not americans? Why wasn't a case made for war court where motive, background and trial of suspect matter?

Even if you were on the frontline you are no 007, saving the world in a mission noone knows about. You are there for the 1% of the american elites economical interest and the american global foothold, despite of the fairytale spun to sell the campaign. Even soldiers, high ranking officers and politicians who deflected or got dismissed for their opinions would agree. If there are any humanitarian efforts needed it is owed for destroying infrastructure. If you want to do real good, help the poor in africa from genocide and starvation. And build infrastructure for them to gain from their own resources, then leave them, not you, to profit from them and develop.

I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country’s most agile military force, the Marine Corps…And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism…I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.

Support them? wow, you are good at drawing conclusions out of your ass.

9/11 was a strategic hit on pentagon which is military and WTC which is financial. If civilians were the target then they would have hit WTC when it was full or at least heavily occupied. The US govt. had prior knowledge of what was going to happen and still did a diversive training exercise. Problem-reaction-solution.
The US military has carpetbombed and remotely driven missilies into areas that have been heavily packed with civilians killing indiscriminately. Compared they are both criminal acts and mass murder.

The US army does not provide me with freedom, in fact they are antagonizing the middle east into pronouncing holy war on the west, if I'm bombed, the US is the reason for it.

There's a reason Guantanamo Bay is not officialy on US territory. It's because it is illegal, unconstitutional, violates human rights and performes torture. It's practically Auswich without the gas chambers.

But how can one argue with someone who wants to defend their actions. If you've killed in conflict it's only basic human nature to hold onto arguments for it to prevent psychological breakdown. ^^