Maurits, of plasticsfuture, has posted an exhaustive, two part review of backup programs on Mac OS X. The first part focuses on the general issue of backing up files on OSX, and the second contains an extensive analysis of more backup programs than I’ve seen covered in one place—freeware, shareware and commercial.

In my blog, I tend to talk about the usability aspects of SuperDuper!, because that’s where I focus my efforts. I can only do that because Bruce and I have very high standards for the rest of SuperDuper!, and Bruce’s copy engine is second to none. In fact, in this review of 16 tools, SuperDuper! was the only tool that worked correctly:

The surprising conclusion is that almost all Macintosh backup or cloning programs do not fulfil (sic) their primary purpose, i.e., they are not able to restore files with all associated metadata. This is despite the fact that many of the tools are advertised as “safe”, “accurate”, “bug-free”, etc. The tools that fail are harmful because they generate a false sense of security. Even more exasperating is that many of these tools cost (significant amounts of) money. The only laudable exception is the great SuperDuper application, which performs flawlessly. (Emphasis mine.)

Many thanks to the pseudonymous Maurits for putting this whole thing together: it couldn’t have been easy to do.

Have Your Saycomments & trackbacks

The trackback URL for this entry is: Trackbacks are disabled for this entry

Congratulations on this well deserved review Dave. It’s great to see a round up of all the backup apps and how they compare at what they do. Especially when SuperDuper! not only comes out on top but comes out as the only real option! Kudos indeed.

Yep, same sjk (not sure about the ‘fame’ part, but thanks ). Living in Hawaii for ~7 years, married with cat. I’ll send you e-mail later and maybe we can dig up +20-year-old nostalgia or something else in common, if you feel like it.