Sex and Sexuality in Islam, Part 5

Sex with captives

Women taken as captives in a war

Islam permits unlimited and boundless sex
with women taken as prisoners in a war. This was (or is) the
practice of the Muslims, including Muhammad during the 'golden' days
of early Islam. The Qur'an permits a Muslim man to have this kind of
coerced sex in the following verses:

004.024Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom
your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions)
against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye
seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring
chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give
them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is
prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you,
and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.

Sex with captive women and slave women is
permitted...23:1-6

023.001The believers must (eventually) win through,-023.002Those who humble
themselves in their prayers;023.003Who avoid vain talk;023.004Who are active in
deeds of charity;023.005Who abstain from
sex,023.006Except with those
joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their
right hands possess,- for (in their case) they are free from blame,

Sex with wives, captives, slaves O.K....70:25-34

070.025 For the (needy) who asks and
him who is prevented (for some reason from asking);070.026 And those who hold to the truth of the Day of
Judgment;070.027 And those who fear the displeasure of their Lord,-070.028 For their Lord's displeasure is the opposite of
Peace and Tranquillity;-070.029 And those who guard their chastity,070.030 Except with their wives and the (captives) whom
their right hands possess,- for (then) they are not to be blamed,070.031 But those who trespass beyond this are
transgressors;-070.032 And those who respect their trusts and covenants;070.033 And those who stand firm in their testimonies;070.034 And those who guard (the sacredness) of their
worship;-070.035 Such will be the honoured ones in the Gardens (of
Bliss).

The above verses make it absolutely obvious
that a Muslim man, whether married or not, can have unhindered and
limitless sex with captive women. In those verses the meaning of
'right hand's possession is either slaves (female) or female
captives, that is prisoners (women) taken in a war. Who are the
captives of war in the present days? One does not need to go too far
to find this out. Since Islam is at perpetual war with all the
infidels, all the women living in infidel countries are, in fact,
fall under this category, at least in theory. This means that a
Muslim man (whether married or not), while living in an infidel
country, can sleep (that is, have sex) with any number of infidel
women without even having the slightest fear of committing Zina
(fornication) or adultery. Many Islamists will even boastfully
acknowledge that these infidel women should consider themselves to
be lucky enough to taste the sweetness of intercourse with a Muslim
man! This is the reason why when I found some Pucca Mussulmans
in a massage parlour in Thailand, and then I asked them about what
they did with those Thai sex kittens, they told me unhesitatingly
that it is permissible to have sex with Thai women as they are not
Muslims (they were sex slaves, because in a world, where Muslims are
oppressed everywhere, they are at war with infidels wherever they
are)! It is a case of Ganimatter maal - a Bengali-Arabic
term often used by rustic mullahs in Bangladesh -- they told me.
Furthermore, they told me that it is all right to have sex with
women if a Muslim visits an infidel land. At that time, I just
pooh-poohed their banter, saying to myself that 'these Mullahs
do not know the 'real Islam.' Then, after a few years later, when I
became interested in Islam and took the study of Islam very
seriously, I was dumbfounded to have discovered that what those
kath or timber Mullahs told me was completely true. This is
what I found when I consulted the living and breathing Islam, that
is, Sha'ria:

No punishment for Zina or adultery
committed in a foreign country (ref. 11, p185)

Punishment is not incurred by committing
whoredom in foreign country. If a Mussulman be guilty of
whoredom in a foreign country, or in the territory of the rebels,
and afterwards return into a Mussulman state, punishment is not to
be meted out on him, on the plea that a man, in embracing the
Mussulman faith, binds himself to all the obligations thereof,
wherever he may be. The arguments of our doctors on this occasion
are twofold; --FIRST, the Prophet has said, "punishment is not to be
inflicted in a foreign land" SECONDLY, the design of the institution
of punishment is that it may operate as a prevention or warning; now
the Mussulman magistrate has no authority in a foreign country,
wherefore if punishment were instituted upon a person committing
whoredom in a foreign country, yet the institution would be useless;
for the use of the institution is that punishment may be executed;
and as the magistrate has no authority in a foreign country, the
execution is impossible; whence it appears that the commission of
whoredom in a foreign country does not occasion punishment there;
and if this person should afterwards come from the foreign territory
into a Mussulman state, punishment cannot be executed upon him;
because as his whoredom did not occasion punishment at the time of
its being committed, it will not afterwards occasion.

In page 59 of Dictionary of Islam (ref.6) it
is written:

CONCUBINE. Arabic Surriyah, pl. sarari. The
Muhammadan religion appears to give almost unlimited license to
concubinage, provided the woman be a slave, and not a free Muslim
woman.

These female slaves must be either (1) taken
captive in war, (2) or purchased by money, (3) or the descendants of
slaves. Even married women, if taken in war, are according to an
injunction of the Qur'an, Surah 4:28, entirely at the disposal of
the Muslim conqueror. "(Unlawful to you are married women, except as
such as your right hand possess (i.e. taken in war, or purchased
slaves)." This institution of concubinage is founded upon the
example of Muhammad himself, who took Rihanah, the Jewess as his
concubine after the battle with the Banu Quraizah (A.H. 5), and also
Maria the Copt, who was sent him as a slave by the Governor of
Egypt.

Quoting Jalalan, one of the foremost
interpreter of the Qur'an, the dictionary of Islam writes further
(ref.6, pp.595-600)...............................

(1)They are allowed to take possession of married women if
they are slaves. Surah iv.28: "Unlawful for you are.....married
women; save such as your right hands possess."

(On this verse
al-Jalalan the commentators say: "that is, it is lawful for them to
cohabit with those women whom you have made captive, even though
their husbands be alive in the Daru'l-Harb.")

(Readers, please note the verse iv.28 in the
Dictionary of Islam is verse 4:24 in the Yusufali's translation of
the Qur'an. This verse was quoted at the beginning of this part).

The Islamists often give us the impression
that many Jihadis joined the Ghazawa (raid for
women and plunder)of Muhammad by falling in love with the
divinity and spiritual attraction of early Islam. When we read the
biography of Muhammad, we find completely different reasons for
these Jihadis to join in the jihad. The greatest
attraction of Muhammad's hordes of marauders was actually sex and
plunder! It is as simple as that. You see, whenever the Muslims
waged war on the infidels, the Muslim soldiers would round up the
enemy women as captives. The old and infirm women were mostly killed
to rid them of their burden. The Jihadis kept alive only
the young and sexy infidels women to gratify their limitless sex
urge or drive, and, afterwards to sell them as slaves or to raise
money by ransoming them to their relatives if were lucky to be
alive.

Here is an interesting reading from Ibn
Ishak's biography of Muhammad. This episode is from Tabuk expedition
(ref. 10, pp.602-603).

After the Hunayn and Taif battle, Muhammad
stayed in Medina for a few months. Then he gave orders to prepare
for a raid on the Byzantines. It was summertime then and the heat
was oppressive and there was a draught in the Arabian Peninsula.
Many people disliked travelling during this time. They longed to
stay at home. In spite of their dislike, the men started preparing
for the raid. Muhammad asked a Muslim, Jadd b. Qays if he would like
to go for Jihad in Tabuk. Jadd declined saying that he loved women
and if he saw Byzantine women he would not be able to control
himself. Muhammad left him alone. It was about him that the verse:
9:49 "There are some who say Give me leave to stay behind....." Was
released.

009.049Among them is (many) a man who says: "Grant me exemption and
draw me not into trial." Have they not fallen into trial already?
and indeed Hell surrounds the Unbelievers (on all sides).

In many Ghazwas, Muhammad himself
took captive women as his wives/concubines. Besides reserving the
prettiest and the sexiest amongst the captive women for himself, he
even distributed some women to his sons in laws, Hazrat Ali and
Hazrat Uthman. Here is a hadith that unmistakably shows how
hungry Hazrat Ali was to have sex with captive/slave women, while
his father-in-law, Muhammad, himself encouraged him to indulge in
such act knowing full well that his (Muhammad's) own daughter,
Fatima was the wife of Ali.In one sense, Muhammad was a very liberal
person in that day and age.In this day of sexual glasnost, I would
like to know how many fathers-in-law would allow their sons-in-law
to have extra-marital relationship.Not a fat chance!

Ali had sex with booty captive women5.59.637

Sahih Bukhari:Volume 5, Book
59, Number 637

Narrated Buraida:

The Prophet sent 'Ali to Khalid to bring
the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and 'Ali had taken a
bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I
said to Khalid, "Don't you see this (i.e. Ali)?" When we reached
the Prophet I mentioned that to him. He said, "O Buraida! Do you
hate Ali?" I said, "Yes." He said, "Do you hate him, for he
deserves more than that from the Khumus."

That the capture of sexy and beautiful women
were one of the main motivating factors for joining in the Jihad by
the early followers of Muhammad, is clearly depicted in the Sirat
Rasul Allah by Ibn Ishak. The old, ugly and not so sexy captive
women were burdensome to the Muslim invaders and as such they were
not desirable. In this most authentic biographical record of
Muhammad, we read that during the Hunayn battle, an old lady was let
off because her mouth was cold and her breast flat, she could not
give birth and her milk was not rich. So, the Jihadi took
six camels in exchange for this old lady (ref.10, p593). This was
not an isolated case. It was the common practice amongst the
Jihadis then; that is, to exchange the ugly ducklings and the
old women for camels.

Further proof of this greed for sexy female
flesh can be had from the episodes on the siege of Taif. The Thaqif
people inhabited Taif. Their women were famous for their beauty and
vivaciousness. Many Jihadis joined in this siege simply to
have plunder and to have sex with these women. One Jihadi admitted
that he did not come to fight the Thaqif but to get a girl to trade
(or to make her pregnant) because the Thaqif people produced
intelligent children (ibid, p.590).

Muhammad himself took Raihana, a pretty young
thing, who happened to be a married Jewish woman captive (after the
slaughter male captives of Bani Quraiza) as his concubine when she
refused to marry him.As written before, he even presented many of
his friends as well as his own sons-in-law (Ali and Othman) with
pretty young captive women to be used as sex slaves. We learn from
Ibn Ishak's biography of Muhammad that when the Muslim soldiers
defeated the B.Hawazin, they captured 6 000 (yes, you heard me right
-- six thousand) women and children. It was one of the biggest and
the best catch of female flesh for the Islami Jihadis. Most
of the beautiful and sexy captives were distributed to the
Jihadis. Muhammad gave Rayta, a beautiful girl to his son in
law (and cousin brother), Hazrat Ali and gave Zaynab, another
beautiful catch to his other sons in law, Hazrat Uthman. Hazrat Umor
also received a share of such female flesh. But he preferred to give
it to his favourite son, Abdulllah to enjoy her at his will (ibid,
p.592-593).

You talk about morality and good judgment!
This was the respect and kindness that the Prophet of "mercy" had
for the helpless captive women! Besides Raihana, Muhammad also took
Jurawyirah (from the raid on Bani al Mustaliq) and Saffiya (a Bani
Nadir Jewess from the raid on Khaibar) as his mistresses.Please note
that most of Muhammad's mistresses or concubines were either Jews
(like Raihana, Juwayriya and Saffiya) or Christians like Mariya, the
Coptic sex slave. Islamic apologists can't wait to announce that
Muhammad was so merciful that he married those helpless women to
free them from being sold as slaves. They will even let us believe
that those hapless women, whose relatives were killed, were actually
very happy to marry Muhammad as they fell in love head over heels
with him after the slaughter! Was Muhammad a virile man in his early
fifties? How disgusting and revolting it is that the prophet of
Islam had inured this filthy practise of using the captives to
satiate his libidinous urge!

You see, whenever, the Muslim army conducted
a raid, they always had the thirst for the succulent body of infidel
women. Their desire to have sex with those captured women was so
compelling that even Allah had to intervene to decree that these
women could be raped after their menstrual periods were over. This
uncivilized and despicable sexual urges of those Islamic soldiers
were so barbaric that they would not even show the sense of decency
by having sex with their women prisoners in privacy. They would not
hesitate to copulate with these hapless women right in the presence
of their husbands who were infidels.How outrageous! How despicable!

Read the following two ahadith and
judge for yourself the divinity in Islamic rules when you compare
those with the rights of the POW as conferred by the Geneva
Convention.

The first hadith indicates that while a few
Muslim soldiers were quite ashamed to perform sexual act with the
captive women in the presence of their husbands, many Jihadis
were quite happy to 'enjoy' these captive women right in front of
their fallen (prisoner) husbands. How 'beautiful'!! In recent times,
we have seen this type of sexual perversions perpetrated by the
Islamic army of Pakistan on their captive booties (captured women)
in the genocide of Bangladeshi folks in 1971. Isn't it that the
Pakistan Islamic army was just carrying out the contents of these
ahadith?You had better believe it.Because scriptural
dictums were invoked by the dirty Punjabi and Pathan soldiers
belonging to marauding force of Gen. Yahya of Pakistan.

The second hadith shows that, many
Jihadis were, at first, hesitant in having copulation with
captive women whose husbands were infidels (polytheists, in this
case). Muhammad (pbuh) sensed some trouble here. He realised that if
Allah did not permit such pleasure to his Jihadis, then
their motivation to cling to him will soon vanish into the thin air.
He sought Allah's intervention; and without any delay, Allah
immediately obliged him by giving His foot soldiers the permission
to ravish these captive women.It seems as if this whimsical Allah is
promoting promiscuity among Mussulmans by codifying sexually deviant
acts in his "holy" book.

Some Jihadis had sex with the
captive women in the presence of their husbands and some were
reluctant to do so (Sunaan Abu Dawud 11.2150)

Sunaan Abu Dawud: Book 11, number 2150

Abu Said al-Khudri said: "The apostle of
Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the
battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They
defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of
the apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the
female captives in the presence of their husbands who were
unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur'anic verse,
"And all married women (are forbidden) unto your save those
(captives) whom your right hand possesses". That is to say, they
are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.""
[The Qur'an verse is 4:24].

One can have sexual intercourse with a
captive woman after she is clear of her period and/or delivery. If
she has a husband then her marriage is abrogated after she becomes a
captive (Quran 4:24)...(Shahih Muslim 8.3432)

Sahih Muslim:Book 008, Number 3432:

Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with
him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (may
peace be upon him) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy
and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them
captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon
him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women
because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most
High, sent down regarding that:" And women already married, except
those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)

A natural question would be, what happens if
a captive woman gets pregnant as a result of having sex with the
Jihadis? Many of those Islamic Jihadis did ponder over
this unwanted pregnancy and wanted to practice coitus interruption
(withdrawing penis before ejaculating) but Muhammad was quite
against it at times and was neutral at other times. Here are some
'beautiful' ahadith.If you read these ahdith
carefully, you will notice that the Jihadis did practise
coitus interruption not only to avoid unwanted pregnancy but it was
also a method of giving them intense sexual pleasure and that was
why they loved doing that!A kind of kinky sex, we may call it. This
means that those hapless captive women were meant not only to
satisfy the normal sexual urge, but were also a means to satisfy
their captor's sexual fantasies and perversions, which, perhaps,
they could not do with their married wives.

[Note: Read more on coitus interruption in
part 3/6 of this article]

Muhammed did not approve coitus interruption
with the captive women of Banu-al-Mustaliq, but he allowed the women
to be raped...( 5.59.459)

Shahih Bukhari: Volume 5, Book
59, Number 459:

Narrated Ibn Muhairiz:

I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri
and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus
interruptus). Abu Said said, "We went out with Allah's Apostle for
the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among
the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on
us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to
do coitus interruptus, we said, 'How can we do coitus interruptus
before asking Allah's Apostle who is present among us?" We asked
(him) about it and he said, 'It is better for you not to do so,
for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to
exist, it will exist."

Many Islamists are ashamed of the provision
of taking captive women as sex slaves in Islam. They try to soften
this barbaric practice by pretending to say something like,"You must
consider the time and the context. There is a misconception on
this.In those days it was all right to have captive women and to
have sex with them because many Muslim soldiers were despatched to
the war zones. So, to satisfy their sex appetite God permitted them
to have such sex.The captive women also needed sex. So it was a
win-win situation.See how beautiful the Islamic rules are!"If we ask
them whether this provision still applies today or not, they simply
try to evade this question by saying something like, "You see, we
must look at the context, when the Muslims conquer any nation, they
will always treat the vanquished fairly with Islamic laws.Islam will
surely protect their women and children.... etc."They simply avoid a
straightforward answer.

Have you ever thought about what will happen
to the infidel American women if the 'Great Satan' is defeated in an
Islamic Jihad?

Let us hear what the 'real Islam' has to
offer on this matter. This is what a well-learned Mullah says about
the captive women:

Right hand possessions (Malak-ul-Yameen)
means slaves and maids, those came in possession of Muslims through
war or purchase. After having the possession of slave maid it is
lawful and correct to have sexual relation with them.
Even today if Muslims get possession over
infidel country, this condition is possible, lawful and correct.

Please peruse the above statement once again.
What is the implication of this Mullah's opinion?I must appreciate
the Mullah for his utter honesty with respect to 'real Islam.'He did
not beat around the bushes. He has given a straightforward,
unadulterated, pure and unambiguous answer that clearly conforms to
the rules of Qur'an and hadith.May I ask the Islamic apologists to
say a few words about this honest reply from this Mullah?

Now, let us look at the wider implications of
this 'Islamic rule.' Imagine that Islamic army invades America,
Britain and all infidel lands.Also, imagine these infidels being
defeated in a catastrophic war.What do you think the Islamic
soldiers will do to all the male infidels?What do you think the
Islamic soldiers would do to all the pretty/young women they would
capture as captives?Do you think that these Islamic soldiers will
honour the covenants of the Geneva Conventions on POW?You must be
out of your mind if you thought so. The soldiers of Islam will do
exactly what the above Mullah has said.Yes, they will sell all the
male captives as slaves and take the young/pretty women as sex
slaves to satisfy their sexual urge. The old women would probably be
killed, as they become a burden to the Muslim invaders.For married
women, their marriage will be immediately made null and void. To
humiliate the great 'Satan' further, the Islamic Jihadis will
probably do sexual act with the captive women right in front of
their men who were, just a short while ago, their husbands.

You may still think this to be impossible.
But, wait!The Pakistani Islamic army did just that in Bangladesh in
1971. They killed about 3 million Bangalees terming them as not so
good Muslims, took 250,000 Bengali women as concubines, and raped
them, many of them repeatedly and not very far off from their near
and dear ones. In recent times, we have heard many such reports from
the Taliban ruled Afghanistan. These disturbing acts may enrage a
lot of people, including many Muslims. Think again. Have the Islamic
soldiers committed any crime/sin as far as Islam is concerned. The
answer is a simple "NO."Therefore, doesn't it make sense to realise
that it is the Islam itself that is the motivating factor for the
rape of the captive women?In Iran, a woman charged with
adultery/blasphemy/apostasy carrying death penalty become a captive
of the Islamic state. Therefore, an Islamic guard is appointed to
have sex with her repeatedly before she is executed. This is a
beautiful and "humane" treatment of infidel women prisoners in
Islam!

Sex with slave women

This one is also a hot topic worthy of
discussion.So far, we learnt the truth about the sexual exploitation
of women taken in a war.This is not the only means by which
unlimited sexual gratification is possible in a 'halal'
way.Buying and selling of women as sex slaves is fully permitted in
Islam. It is a perfectly a legitimate way to acquire as many
sex-slaves as possible.Sky is not the limit, though.The only
limitation is the affordability. One may say that this type of flesh
trading is no more practiced today.This is true. However, nothing
can prevent the Islamists from re-introducing the slave markets as
per Qur'an and Sunnah when their 'Jihad' against
the infidels is successful. Sexual slavery is absolutely legitimate
in Islam. If Islam conquered the world, slavery could have never
been eradicated, because Islamic laws are written on granite stone
and are absolutely unchangeable.So, if Islam conquers the infidel
countries, there is nothing that could prevent the Islamic zealots
from re-introducing the slavery system and the slave markets around
the globe for trading in female bodies of infidel women. If the
Islamists can re-introduce the amputation of hands and feet for
theft, stoning to death for adultery, beheading for apostasy and
many other barbaric Sha'ria rules, what will prevent them
from re-introducing Islamic slavery?Please do think about this.

Muhammad himself had a Coptic slave that was
presented to him by the ruler of Alexandria in Egypt. When the
delegate from Muhammad visited this Coptic head of Egypt (Muaqaqis)
with an invitation for him to convert to Islam, he politely refused
to do so, but knowing the taste of Muhammad, he presented Muhammad
with two beautiful and sexy slave girls who were sisters.Muhammad
took Mariya, the most beautiful one for himself and gave her sister,
Sirin, to his poet friend, Hassan ibn Thabit for him to enjoy
her.Mariya gave birth to Ibrahim, Muhammad's last child who died at
infancy.Sirin bore a son named Abdul Rahman to Hassan, the poet
(ref. 10, p. 498-499). All these historical records are absolute
proof that enjoying a female slave is totally 'halal' in
Islam.

Here are a few more 'gems' from ahadith.
Please peruse the following divine sanctions and judge for yourself
the mercy, blessing, tolerance, and last but not the least, fairness
towards women in Islam when it comes to sex.

You can have sexual intercourse with two
slave girls at a time without ghusl (bath) but can't do
like this with free women...(Malik's Muwatta 2.23.90)

Malik's Muwatta:Book 2, Number 2.23.90:

Yahya related to
me from Malik from Nafi that the slave girls of Abdullah ibn Umar
used to wash his feet and bring him a mat of palm leaves while they
were menstruating.

Malik was asked whether a man who had women
and slave girls could have intercourse with all of them before he
did ghusl. He said, "There is no harm in a man having intercourse
with two of his slave girls before he does ghusl. It is disapproved
of, however, to go to a freewoman on another's day. There is no harm
in making love first to one slave girl and then to another when one
is junub."

Malik was asked
about a man who was junub and water was put down for him to do ghusl
with.Then he forgot and put his finger into it to find out whether
it was hot or cold. Malik said, "If no filth has soiled his fingers,
I do not consider that that makes the water impure."

Here is something that will break your
conscience as it did even the conscience of stonehearted, cruel
Hazrat Umar. This hadith tells us that before banning by Umar, it
was okay to have sex with a slave mother and her young daughter one
after the other.How disgusting!How revolting!!

If a woman and her daughter were both slave
(or captive) then you can't have sex with one of them after the
other. Umar forbade this practice...(Malik's Muwatta 28.14.33)

Malik's Muwatta:Book 28, Number 28.14.33:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn
Shihab from Ubaydullah ibn Abdullah ibn Utba ibn Masud from his
father that Umar ibn al-Khattab was asked about a woman and her
daughter who were in the possession of the right hand, and whether
one could have intercourse with one of them after the other Umar
said, "I dislike both being permitted together." He then forbade
that.

If both sisters are slaves (or captives) then
you may or may not have sex with them depending on the
interpreter...(Malik's Muwatta 28.14.34)

Malik's Muwatta:Book 28, Number 28.14.34:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn
Shihab from Qabisa ibn Dhu'ayb that a man asked Uthman ibn Affan
whether one could have intercourse with two sisters who one owned.
Uthman said, "One ayat makes them halal, and one ayat makes them
haram. As for me, I wouldn't like to do it." The man left him and
met one of the companions of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace, and asked him about it, and he
said, "Had I any authority and I found someone who had done it, I
would punish him as an example."

Ibn Shihab added, "I think that it was Ali
ibn Abi Talib. "

Sexual perversion is fully permitted when a
slave girl is involved. We find in HEDAYA that a man can have sex
with his slave girl in any manner although he has restrictions while
doing this with his own wife/s.

Can have sex with a slave woman in any
manner--- (ref.11, p.600)

A man may gratify his passion with his
female slave in whatever way he pleases It is lawful for a man
to perform the act of Azil (i.e. coitus interruption
writer) with his female slave without her consent, whereas he cannot
lawfully do so by his wife unless with her permission. -The reason
of this is that the Prophet has forbidden the act of Azil with a
free woman without her consent but has permitted it to a master in
the case of his female slave. Besides, carnal connexion is the right
of a free woman for the gratifying of her passion, and the
propagation of children (whence it is that a wife is at liberty to
reject a husband who is an eunuch or impotent); whereas a slave
possesses no such right. A man, therefore, is not at liberty to
injure the right of his wife, whereas a master is absolute with
respect to his slave. If, also, a man should marry the female slave
of another, he must not perform the act of Azil with her without the
consent of her master.

And here are a few more 'gems' from Islam

Father can give his slave-girl to his son
to do conditional things...(Malik's Muwatta 28.15.38)

Malik's Muwatta:Book 28, Number 28.15.38:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibrahim
ibn Abi Abla from Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan that he gave a
slave-girl to a friend of his, and later asked him about her. He
said, "I intended to give her to my son to do such-and-such with
her." Abd al-Malik said, "Marwan was more scrupulous than you. He
gave a slave-girl to his son, and then he said, 'Do not go near
her, for I have seen her leg uncovered .' "

A master can have sex with the slave-girl
of his male or female slave...(Malik's Muwatta 29.17.51)

Malik's Muwatta:Book 29, Number 29.17.51:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi
that Abdullah ibn Umar said, "If a man gives his slave permission
to marry, the divorce is in the hand of the slave, and nobody else
has any power over his divorce. Nothing is held against a man who
takes the slave-girl of his male slave or the slave-girl of his
female-slave."

Slave-girls are like fields if you wish
then water it by ejaculating inside them or leave it thirsty i.e.
coitus interruption with slave-girls is optional...(Malik's
Muwatta 29.32.99)

Malik's Muwatta: Book 29, Number
29.32.99:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Damra
ibn Said al-Mazini from al-Hajjaj ibn Amr ibn Ghaziya that he was
sitting with Zayd ibn Thabit when Ibn Fahd came to him. He was
from the Yemen. He said, "Abu Said! I have slave-girls. None of
the wives in my keep are more pleasing to me than them, and not
all of them please me so much that I want a child by them, shall I
then practise coitus interruptus?" Zayd ibn Thabit said, "Give an
opinion, Hajjaj!" "I said, 'May Allah forgive you! We sit with you
in order to learn from you!' He said, 'Give an opinion! 'I said,
'She is your field, if you wish, water it, and if you wish, leave
it thirsty. I heard that from Zayd.' Zayd said, 'He has spoken the
truth.' "

It is possible to share slave-woman for
sexual purposes. Thus, a father can have sex with his son's or even
grandson's slave-women; a son can borrow his father's or mother's or
even his wives slave women for unlimited sex.Here are few excerpts
from HEDAYA (reference 11), the most authentic commentary on Islamic
Laws that even the lawyers consult.

No punishment for having sex with the
female slaves of a son or a grandson ---(ref: 11: page 183)

Nor that with the female slave of a son
or a grandson. PUNISHMENT is not incurred for a man having
carnal connexion with the female slave of his son, or of his
grandson, although he should acknowledge his consciousness of such
female slave having unlawful to him, for in this case the error is
by effect, since it proceeds from an argument founded upon the words
of the prophet, who said to one with whom he was conversing, "THOU
AND THINE are thy FATHER'S "-- and the grandfather is subject to the
same rule with the father, as he is also a parent. The parentage
also of the child begotten in such carnal conjunction is established
in the father aforesaid, who remains responsible to his son for the
value of the female slave.

Or of a father, mother, or wife (where
misconception is pleaded) If a person have carnal connexion
with the female slave of his father, or his mother, or his wife, and
plead his conception that such slave was lawful to him, he does not
incur punishment; neither is the accuser liable to punishment ( but
if he should acknowledge his consciousness of the illegality,
punishment is to be inflicted upon him,--and the same rule obtains
where a slave has connexion with the bondmaid of his
master):--because between these there a community of interests in
the acquisition of profit; and hence the man who commits the act may
in those cases have conceived, with respect to the enjoyment, that
this species of usufruct is also lawful to him,--wherefore error by
misconception is applicable to him; but nevertheless this is accrual
whoredom, for which reason punishment is not incurred by the
accuser. The law is the same (according to the Zahir Rawayet), if
the female slave, in either of these cases, were to plead her
supposing that the act was lawful, without any such plea on the part
of the man,--because the carnal conjunction of a man and a woman
being one act, it follows that a plea of supposed legality, made by
either party, establishes error with respect to both and hence the
punishment of both is abrogated.

Is any one interested in looking at the
private parts of a woman?Of course, most men would like to do just
this, albeit secretly. That is why we have 'Playboy', 'Penthouse',
'Ralph,'........ etc.,magazines. Looking at the glossy pages of
these magazines with pictures of naked woman is a great fun that
most men will indulge in but very few men (Muslim) will dare to
admit. The bad news for these men is that looking at a woman (not
related to him) below the level of her naval is absolutely forbidden
in Islam. Forget about touching her. It is a kabirah gunaah
(absolute sin.) One cannot even look at the naked hands of a woman.
This is the height of morality in Islam. Most Islamists cannot wait
to announce to the world the great respect they have for women by
citing these absurd, silly practices. We would accept this custom as
a practice of great morality had it been applied to all women
regardless of her social status. Nope. Believe it or not, it does
not apply all women. If you are unfortunate enough to be a
slave-woman then you become an object of display of flesh. Islam
allows a man to look at every part of a slave (or a captive) woman
including her, breast, vagina, clitoris, anus, --- every part of her
pudenda. Unbelievable, you say. Read the following Sha'ria
law on the inspection of a slave-woman for sexual purposes.

Slave woman can look at pudenda---(ref. 11,
p.599)

A man may view his wife or his slave in
any part. IT is lawful for a man to look at his slave girl in
any part, provided he be not related him within the prohibited
degrees; and also at his wife in any part, even in the pudenda, if
he pleases; because the Prophet said, "shut your eyes from all
excepting your wives and female slaves." Nevertheless, it is most
becoming that a husband and wife should neither of them look at the
genital parts of the other, as the Prophet gas said, "when ye
copulate with women of your own tribe, you must conceal as much s
possible; and be not then naked, as that savours too much of the
custom of asses."

Although the above provision recommends a man
to show restraints while copulating, nothing can prevent him from
indulging in all sorts of fetish/sadomasochism with a slave woman,
if he wishes so. Since beating of women is a permitted in the Qur'an
(see Qur'an verse 4:34), therefore, sadomasochistic method of sexual
gratification is absolutely possible in an Islamic way.

It is noteworthy that many Islamists often
hide the truth about the extreme tyranny of sexual slavery under
Islam by saying that one can marry a slave woman. On the surface,
this looks fair enough. But when we dig deeper, we find the naked
truth. The truth is that a Muslim man cannot marry his own
slave-woman. He can only marry a slave woman that belongs to another
person. He cannot purchase a slave woman and marry her. It is
forbidden. However, he is allowed to have unlimited sex with her
(the woman bought as a sex slave).

Can't marry one's own slave but can have
sex with her---(ibid, p.317)

The Legal Disabilities to Marriage

There are nine prohibitions to marriage
namely:-

_____-----*****O*****-----_____

8. A woman is prohibited by reason of
property. For example, it is not lawful for a man to marry his own
slave, or a woman her bondsman.