Help Centre

Green cop, red cop?

With Adam Bandt as deputy, Christine Milne can take a more centrist line on issues as they arise in the Senate. If she doesn't there'll be little room to manoeuvre when businesses topple and joblessness rises.

Is Adam Bandt playing 'bad cop' to Christine Milne's 'good'? Yesterday he stared menacingly across the interrogation table, stubbed out a cigarette, and told employers that in here, no one can hear you scream.

Perhaps just after he's picked up a telephone book with which to beat the detainee about the head, Milne will burst into the room to stay his hand – "Take a few minutes Officer Bandt, I'll handle this."

The war of words yesterday was over the Greens' role as the Senate's balance of power party, and whether or not they'll use that role, as the Democrats did, to "take the harsher edges off the legislative program of the government of the day", as ACCI boss Peter Anderson put it in a speech to the Australian Labour and Employment Relations Association (the new name adopted by what was formerly the Industrial Relations Society).

Anderson is pretty sure the Greens will only add "harsher edges" as amendments to the Fair Work Act are proposed when the current review of the Act is concluded.

In his speech Anderson said: "What I do urge is that the Greens, in the exercise of their balance of power functions in the Senate, take a more centrist position on specific Bills, given that much of their ideology is not the majority view of the community

"From the 1980s until 2005 economic reform was achieved through the parliament with a compromise here and there, such as Paul Keating’s introduction of enterprise bargaining in 1993 (but with secondary boycott provisions remaining), Peter Reith’s statutory individual bargaining in 1996 (but with a no disadvantage test) and John Howard’s goods and services tax in 1998 (but with food, health and education exempt).

"A hard collectivist line on industrial relations might appeal to the faithful, but it’s hardly the basis for balance in a modern industrial relations framework."

Bandt reacted with a familiar and proven line – that the Greens are "protecting people's rights at work".

He said in a statement: "Productivity increases will come by building better cities and investing in education, not by lowering wages and conditions.

"The majority of the community is with the Greens in protecting people's rights at work. Big business needs to stop its repeated assaults on wages and conditions and instead work with the Greens to build a 21st century clean energy economy that will lift living standards for all of us."

Well, yes and no. There are two different time-scales at work here. For many of Anderson's members, there is no time to boost productivity in the way Bandt is suggesting. Large sections of the non-resources economy teeter on the brink of recession, a fact driven home by comments Prime Minister Gillard will deliver in a speechlater today that will increase pressure on the RBA to cut rates.

Rob Burgess

Latest News

Related Articles

IMPORTANT: This information has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs and you should consider if the information is appropriate for you before making an investment decision. Unless otherwise specifically stated or disclosed (such as the InvestSMART Diversified Portfolios Product Disclosure Statement), neither InvestSMART Financial Services Pty Ltd nor any of its Related Companies make any recommendations as to the merits of any investment opportunity referred to in its emails or its related websites. Product disclosure statements for financial products offered through InvestSMART can be downloaded from this website or obtained by contacting 1300 880 160. You should consider the product disclosure statement before making a decision about the product. All indications of performance returns are historical and can not be relied upon as an indicator for future performance.