to be fair, if your primary motivation to make a lot of money is so that you can bang hot chicks, just cut to the chase and get an escort.

i swear, a lot of you guys just don't think logically. over here doing everything you possibly can to get inside the pants of a hot chick, but you could have saved yourself the trouble and just gotten an escort (who's probably hotter than whatever you could get with your biglaw salary).

It depends. Some of the really really hot like actual model chicks are basically hookers but really expensive. Like ~1000. These are pretty common in cities you'd expect there to be legit models in.

College girls are kind of selective about the guy, so you need to play it cool with them but if you are under 40 and decent-ish looking it shouldn't be a problem. Ive gotten away with giving them a hundred bucks or so every time we hangout for the night. Its kind of odd, but I guess they get a fun nigth at a nice bar with a halfway normal and interesting older dood and get a hundred bucks to take home. Most of these girls are just doing it for fun, so you can really low ball them. And it really almost is a "real date"

I had one college girl, who I texted back and forth with for like a week, come over to my place. I had just told her I'd "make it worth her time." We fucked, I creampied, and gave 120. She left and we actual hungout a few more times without exchaning money. I think she just had a dirty whore fetish.

A) In Bigger cities it doesn't mean as much. Not only because everyone makes more there, but also because there tend to be a lot of people living off of their parents there. The girl working a 9-5 PR job who gets 5k a month tax free from her parents on top of her 55k salary isn't all that impressed by a big law salary after taxes.

B) It probably does the most with chicks looking to settle down. But for just getting ass, girls are looking more for "fun guys." Long hours and a stressful job usually don't equal a really "fun guy."

C) Finally...and this is the big one...if they are really after money, they can probably find a 30-40 year old (with a less "prestigious" job) who has less stress and more fun who makes more and has a hell of a lot more in savings.

Remember, a 24 year old chick who can date 24-40 year old dudes can find a lot of older dudes who make more than a young big lawyers. The thing she may like about younger dudes is that they are fun. Hence the problem with big lawyers. See above.

lol @ you guys trying to get women by flashing some money in front of them. instead of doing that, improve your looks and personality and your job/income won't even matter because chicks will want to fuck you just because youre hot and fun to be around.

I have seen girls date guys for money. But those girls still want fun dudes and the older (usually kind of douche bag...but whatever) guys make more moeny even in shitty jobs, are more fun and worth more. The only thing 20-something guys bring to the table from a girls POV is fun.

Do you guys actually think most chicks know what biglaw lawyers make? I'm not convinced. I know that chicks in and around the profession do, but most girls with a 55k job at a marketing agency probably just assumes biglaw is 80k, no? Or am I assuming they're dumber than they really are?

Assuming they don't know, what's the credited way of showing them how much we make? Should I start carrying pay stubs and casually leaving them in places she'll notice, i.e., next to the toilet, under her pillow, etc.

even more than assuming they probably have a friend or relative who is shit lawyer or midlawyer or whatever and maybe they get that you work for a really good firm but they don't get the difference in pay.

Bros, I'm pleading with you. Your whole life you thought, "if I just grind through high school ill go to a top ug and chicks will eat it up," but they didn't. Then at college you thought, "if I just get biglaw chicks will eat it up." But nothing changed after oci. Now in Biglaw you think, "I make a ton, surely chicks my age will want me now!" But they still don't. They never will. Get in the gym, get some cool clothes, get some swagger and learn to at least fake like you're a fun, alpha chillbro. The time for self delusion has passed.

this flame repeats itself every year, but i will briefly entertain your flame.

biglaw money alone is not sufficient wealth to attract all but the most cynical or poor females. you do not have life changing wealth for almost any normal girl.

the type of women you are looking for would prefer a dude making 80k who is otherwise attractive than some boring nerd making twice that amount. of course, a fun and decent looking guy that also has big law money can do very, very well, because he is the "total package" women are looking for (but rarely finding) these days.

Date: May 7th, 2013 9:39 AMAuthor: I want to be greedy for the United States.

The things you can buy on $160k compared to $80k are different in scope but not kind.

You can both go to fancy restaurants/bars/lounges, go to clubs sometimes, go on vacations. The only difference is how often.

You can get a nicer apartment and car with $160k, but this only helps if you get a chick in your car/apartment in the first place.

The only people I know who really get girls from $$$ have super nice places they can throw parties in, or boats they throw parties on, or doing bottle service for 20 people. None of that is within Biglaw reach.

Ive said before that money only makes a difference at the extremes: If you can't afford dinner out anywhere at all, you are fucked. And if you can afford to fly her to Paris for the weekend on a whim, every other weekend, you are helped. But not really a difference short of those extremes.

Don't you guys have female friends. I love going out to the bar with female friends and watching them mess with guys who have money. You're nothing but a drink voucher to them. They'll be going home with someone else.

I briefly talked about this in another thread. Chicago chicks seem to want that fratty type of guy, which I assume most lawyers in Chicago do not satisfy. In the times I have been there, there are maybe 1-2 lawyers out of 20 that fit the bill. Also, it seems as if you are fucked if you didn't do a Big10 or a Midwest school (e.g., Notre Dame or DePaul).

Now this is pure conjecture, but it seems like a Chicago chick would go for a $90K, fratty dude, that went to Mich over some $160K, BigLaw dude, that went to a T-14 (excluding Midwest T14s).

First of all, relax man, were in this together. Second, no, the talent need not be that great. It is enough to be the best pickup sportsman in your group or talented enough to legitimately entertain a party full of people with your musical stylings. You have never seen this in action?

tbf, even in MFH, i've had random girls comment on how much money lawyers make.

things like, you make more than both of us [girls] combined

or like, you made more your first year than i do today

way back as a first year some girls were like, set us up with your friends, and i downplayed it saying, there are bigger fish in this pond than a first year associate. but their response was like, well first years become second years and then become partners. we don't care.

i don't think they knew exactly. they were probably even attempting to pry. they were like personal assistants and marketing editors. there are so many 20-something chicks in MFH and Bklyn that do shit like that and make $50-80k that I suppose it was right for them to assume that.

i guess these chicks knew the concept of partner but didn't really get the long shot aspect.