The notion of 'thousands of victims' was crucial to generate universal public outrage. However, having 3000 angry families breathing down their necks was never part of the perps' demented plan. Our ongoing analyses and investigations suggest that NO one died on 9/11.

I am still skeptical that these faces are being generated by a "neural network" which is just a newspeak way of saying a matrix, the basic form of computing, by the way.

Perhaps, a computer performs a basic generation algorithm and then a visual engineer, which many people still refer to as an "artist," will tiddy up the computer's output and make sure it is possesses the desired affect.

But, given the mass of desperate unethical people who possess the necessary skills in the "competitive" environments of cities such as Los Angeles, New York and San Francisco, to name a few, I see no reason why these visual engineers wouldn't the one's generating these faces from scratch with occasion software aid.

It's a ridiculous photo with 2 different looking adult arms on a kid who looks about 6. When I first saw the photo I thought the kid was famous 60s child actor Mark Lester below on the left.Then googled Mark Lester to get a comparison photo, only to discover another rabbit hole that Mark Lester was a buddy of Michael Jackson and rumored to be the father of Paris Jackson, Michael's only daughter. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ckson.html

The evidence that it's photo-shopped is the fact that all of the pedestrians are walking away from the towers so casually. That is completely unrealistic.

I'm not seeing the Mark Lester connection at all, and the Austin Sansone character does not look like the 18 year old Lester. I don't think it's ever so simple to attempt to "match" people from photos, and it really doesn't matter who the person is, the photo is clearly fake.