The United States: A Corporation

If
you really want to understand why this is true, then you will have to look at
each of the following pieces of the puzzle... This will take a lot of your time
and more importantly, the suspension of your idealism and belief. That is hard.

Let's focus on proving the corporate structure of the Federal Government, so
that there is no doubt in your mind...

Here is the first carrot that I will dangle in front of you to get you to keep
reading! This is from the U.S. CODE.

U.S. CODE is the corporate code of the UNITED STATES Federal corporation. Here
it states that "United States" is defined as "a Federal
corporation".

First, understand that the "United States" Federal corporation is a
ten mile stretch of land that is not one of the 5o states united, and that this
was mandated in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution.

Team
Law down in SoCal has a great fact-sheet printed here... read this to get an
understanding of the corporate setup of D.C, by charter in 1801:

Note that this Article only gave the federal government authority over the D.C.
land - not to exceed 10 miles square. This is the corporate structure that is
the Federal Government. Note that the Government is not allowed to
"own" land outside of this 10 mile D.C. area. Also, states are not
authorized to "own" land either. So all federal lands, state parks,
national parks, etc... are not "property" of the constitutional
government.

But a corporation... which the Supreme Court now says is a person too with
first amendment rights... that becomes a whole other can of worms!

Now, as referenced above, "The Act of 1871" (Google this term for
other pdf files which explain this in more detail, but watch for misinformation
as well). It does seem like a redundancy, as mentioned above. Though it does
seem to join the few "municipalities" of Washington D.C. into one
"municipal corporation".

Equally as intriguing is this info which says that English Parliament changed
the social security system in the United States. It is very hard to except that
the history we have learned is false. But until we do, we know nothing but
false history, written by the "victors". Also check out the "Treaty
of Peace" (as referenced in this article, and the "Treaty of
1213", showing the Vatican owns the Crown.

It is also very hard for most to imagine that the constitution that we hold so
dearly is not a very good document. It takes away freedom as much as it grants
it. The only true freedom is God-given, natural law, not a peace of paper.
Besides, most politicians only take a verbal oath, but they do not turn it in
in writing, which is what contracts them to the oath... Big grand jury's going
on up in Utah here about that, since about 75% of our government is not sworn
in on paper (lawfully). In fact, one of our smaller towns recently passed a
code that says legislatures and government workers are not bound by any oath
they take. It is city law in Tremonton, Utah!!!

For instance, why would anyone think that the 5th amendment is a good thing, or
even idealistically "constitutional"?

"...nor shall be compelled in
any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private
property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

Notice that the clause "without due process of law" nullifies the
statement before it, and "without just compensation" nullifies the
statement before it!

This last part is called the "Takings Clause", and is what eminent
domain is largely based on - taking property and land with "just
compensation". Who decides what "just compensation" is? Why the
very government that is doing the "taking"!

Section
1.
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for
crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the
United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

Section
2.
"Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate
legislation."

The
statement "except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have
been duly convicted" nullifies the former and later statement that slavery
is illegal. This didn't outlaw slavery... it legalized state sanctioned slavery
while outlawing private individual ownership!

The
constitution is full of these "except" clauses, which is why this
holy worship of the constitution is ridiculous in my mind, and why it needs to
be rewritten for modern times, not just reinstated. For once in history, the
problem with a legal document is that it does not have enough small print!!!

Even worse, the "Federal Prison Industries" website is the
"Amway" or "Wallmart" for the corporate U.S. slave prison
system, called Unicor. Basically, the private prison system is huge. It relies
on the courts to ensure a continuous influx of "prisoners" or
"slaves" to build the products which the Federal Prison Industries
sells. Think jobs are outsourced to India, check out the jobs outsourced to the
prison industry!

Unicor Corporate OverviewUNICOR, Federal Prison Industries is
a
self-sustaining, self-funded corporation established in 1934 by executive order
to create a voluntary real-world work program to train federal inmates.
Check out Unicor here:

***Also, the most important legal term you can understand is
"CONSENT". This is a must read. It also shows that the whole of the
Internal Revenue Code is not statutory law, and in fact is Prima Facie law,
meaning it is presumed law, meaning it is only law with the free peoples
consent. Please, please read this. It will change your whole perspective on
what law is and how if affects you.

But aren't the courts there to ensure justice against government tyranny, you
know, the whole checks and balances thingy?

The biggest mistake you can make is to get an attorney (plead incompetence and
inability to represent yourself and become a ward of the court) and then go
into court to fight anything (consent to the corporate court and its
non-statutory legal codes - not law). Why?

You must understand that the courts are also private corporations. In fact, in
Los Angeles they did a freedom of information act and found out that the judges
down there build and own the private corporate courts, rent them out to the
government for millions of dollars, and write checks on dummy and city
"municipal" accounts that are not registered with the IRS! In other
words, the court system is a money laundering system. This is happening all
over the U.S. It involves the crime families as well, and even the Mormon
Church (Mormon Inc. - a for-profit private corporation).

Watch these videos (though they are of horrible quality and production, they is
very revealing):

Understanding the difference between what is lawful and what is legal is
paramount. They are two different concepts, one natural law and one corporate
law (legality and code) with the peoples' consent needed.

If this doesn't do the trick, then I am almost all out of tricks. If you
haven't watched The Corporation Nation, now would be the time. The movie will
explain the rest, and explain the general accounting system for government, the
CAFR.