Search form

Search this site

The United States Institute of Peace (USIP) was established by Congress in 1984 as an independent, federally-funded national security institution devoted to the nonviolent prevention and mitigation of deadly conflict abroad.

Background: A civil war in Chad ended in August 1979 with the signing of the Lagos Accord, and a national unity government was established. In 1981, fighting broke out between President Oueddei's and Defense Minster Hissene Habré's forces. Once Habré gained control, he began a campaign of widespread repression including torture and killings. Intervention by French, Zairian (Congolese), and Libyan forces failed to oust Habré from power until Idriss Deby, on of Habré’s former generals, fled to Sudan and gained Libyan backing to launch a successful attack against Habré in December 1990. Deby became president in February 1991 and established the commission to investigate crimes committed during Habré's eight-year rule.
Charter:Decree No. 014 /P.CE/CJ/90 (PDF-54KB), December 29, 1990

Mandate: The commission’s mandate was to investigate illegal detentions, assassinations, disappearances, torture, mistreatment, other attacks on the physical and mental integrity of persons; plus all violations of human rights, illicit narcotics trafficking and embezzlement of state funds between 1982 and 1990.

Commissioners and Structure: The decree creating the commission named ten members and two secretaries as the members of the commission of inquiry; one commissioner was female. It was chaired by Chad's Chief Prosecutor Mahamat Hassan Abakar.

Report: The commission's report (PDF-1382KB) was published May 7, 1992. The report was reprinted in Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Vol. 3, Laws, Rulings, and Reports, page 51-90.

Findings:

Conclusions

Habré’s government was named responsible for an estimated 40,000 deaths.

Among the institutions of the Habré regime, the Directorate of Documentation and Security was particularly responsible for cruelty, contempt, and terrorizing the population.

The commission’s report described the involvement of foreign governments in funding and training the perpetrators.

Recommendations

The commission’s principle recommendation was to accelerate the establishment of an independent judiciary and to reform the security forces.

The commission recommended the timely creation of a National Human Rights Commission and prosecutions as well as symbolic reparations.

Subsequent Developments:

Reforms

Currently, more than forty ex-leaders of the political police and other Habré-era regime still occupy official positions.

Prosecutions

In 2001, a police squad, led by the former deputy director of National Security under Habré’s regime, allegedly attacked Jacqueline Moudeïna, a Chadian lawyer working for the victims. Other individuals who tried to prosecute Habré and his accomplices have received threats.

The commission’s report took on new importance in 2000 and 2001, when human rights organizations used it to support their efforts to have Habré prosecuted for violations of international criminal law.

In July 2006, Senegal announced that it would prosecute Habré in Senegal for his abuse of human rights during his regime. A year later, the Senegalese Justice Minister determined that Habré would be tried in a Senegalese criminal court, rather than a special tribunal. The Senegalese national assembly amended its constitution in April 2008 in order to try international crimes within Senegal.

In August 2008, Habré was convicted in absentia of crimes against humanity and sentenced to death by a criminal court in Chad.

Special Notes: The Chadian commission of inquiry was the first commission to name those individuals it concluded were the worst human rights abusers and the only commission to publish photographs of those named. When the report was released, many of these individuals were already serving in the new government or its armed forces. While the report made a strong plea for purging all those who served under the former intelligence service, there were no purges after the reports release.

Due to its lack of resources, the commission set up its offices in the headquarters of the former secret police detention center where a majority of torture and killing took place. Many victims were deterred from giving testimony as a result.

In Voting in Fear, nine contributors offer pioneering work on the scope and nature of electoral violence in Africa; investigate the forms electoral violence takes; and analyze the factors that precipitate, reduce, and prevent violence. The book breaks new ground with findings from the...

As South Sudan prepares to declare its independence on July 9, political leaders and legal specialists there have been working for months to prepare a transitional constitution that will create a framework for South Sudan’s transformation from an autonomous region to an independent state.

Governments and rebels alike are readily using – and often abusing – standard justice mechanisms like trials or amnesties during conflicts, even as part of their military strategy. And because they’re using the terminology of Western-style rule of law, the international community generally has failed to carefully examine these practices for their longer-term impact. New research, supported in part by a grant from the U.S. Institute of Peace, documents the trend and explores its potentially devastating effect on efforts to rebuild societies after war.

Four years after the fall of Muammar Gadhafi, Libya has become even more violent. Explosions, assassinations, kidnappings, and fighting between militias are commonplace. The central government is extremely fragile. This report highlights some of the opportunities and obstacles in a transitional setting. Its goal is to spark debate among scholars, policymakers, practitioners, and civil society actors about the role of customary law and the potential of restorative justice in a transitional setting.

Following Ireland’s constitutional referendum to legalize same-sex marriage, the newly appointed senior U.S. diplomat on human rights for gender minorities said he is “incredibly optimistic” about the prospects for the global campaign to guarantee such protections. Still, U.S. Special Envoy Randy Berry and an international group of activists said May 26 that gender-rights movements in many countries face tougher political landscapes than in Ireland and must rely heavily on more legalistic approaches to winning constitutional protections for their minorities.

Disputes over land in Afghanistan have become one of the key drivers of conflict and criminal violence. Both formal and informal mechanisms for land dispute resolution are weak. The legal framework fails to recognize the reality of informal or customary ownership arrangements. The current land law, revised in 2008, is a fraught one—to establish ownership a person must already have formal documents proving ownership, and if ownership by an individual cannot be proved, title defaults to the state. However, formal documentation is scarce: no more than 20 percent of land is titled. This report discusses a new approach to addressing the problem and offers recommendations for reform.