UFO over the Kremlin? - Think Atheist2018-03-19T12:57:13Zhttp://www.thinkatheist.com/forum/topics/ufo-over-the-kremlin?feed=yes&xn_auth=noThere are report of a live UF…tag:www.thinkatheist.com,2012-06-28:1982180:Comment:11479472012-06-28T16:41:21.116ZMichaelhttp://www.thinkatheist.com/profile/Michael456
<p>There are report of a live UFO/USO at the bottom of the baltic sea. In fact this is a neolithic site that is complete with stairways and altars. The most pecular thing is that the neolithic object is alive with EMF.</p>
<p>All electrical equipment die in proximity to to object and regain function at some distance.</p>
<p>This could be a neolithic occult site. maybe the site is magnetic and the flow of salt water around the object creates the EMF. In any event worth further investigation. But…</p>
<p>There are report of a live UFO/USO at the bottom of the baltic sea. In fact this is a neolithic site that is complete with stairways and altars. The most pecular thing is that the neolithic object is alive with EMF.</p>
<p>All electrical equipment die in proximity to to object and regain function at some distance.</p>
<p>This could be a neolithic occult site. maybe the site is magnetic and the flow of salt water around the object creates the EMF. In any event worth further investigation. But any apparent magic is most likely natural.</p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fumXelkOCHI?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</p>
<p> </p> There is no such thing as not…tag:www.thinkatheist.com,2011-12-16:1982180:Comment:10015602011-12-16T04:48:27.502ZMichaelhttp://www.thinkatheist.com/profile/Michael456
<p>There is no such thing as not following the laws of physics. That also is not being said. What is being said is by different construction, inertia and the repulse charge of the electron shell can be avoided. But the new structure is indeed subject to the physics that such properties would induced. This property will include the ability to travel faster than light when not subject to the Higgs field.</p>
<p>There is no such thing as not following the laws of physics. That also is not being said. What is being said is by different construction, inertia and the repulse charge of the electron shell can be avoided. But the new structure is indeed subject to the physics that such properties would induced. This property will include the ability to travel faster than light when not subject to the Higgs field.</p> That's not what's being propo…tag:www.thinkatheist.com,2011-12-16:1982180:Comment:10015492011-12-16T03:59:48.749ZMichaelhttp://www.thinkatheist.com/profile/Michael456
<p>That's not what's being proposed some quanta assemblage must obviously be in place of the electron shell to maintain order. subatomic particles, I believe more than 20 been identified constitute a huge erector set. Moreover with atom smashers increase in Gigaev more particles are and shall be discovered. convergence occurs when two elemental particles can yield the same resulting particle or field. For instance using the Feynman diagram a higgs particle could be produce by either two gluons…</p>
<p>That's not what's being proposed some quanta assemblage must obviously be in place of the electron shell to maintain order. subatomic particles, I believe more than 20 been identified constitute a huge erector set. Moreover with atom smashers increase in Gigaev more particles are and shall be discovered. convergence occurs when two elemental particles can yield the same resulting particle or field. For instance using the Feynman diagram a higgs particle could be produce by either two gluons or two quarks. The same field produce by two different particles. analogously structure induced by electron orbitials could be emulated by alternative assemblage. The assemblage could be neutral and thus avoid the huge repulsive charge of the electron shell. Construction on the subatomic level is thinking out of the box but may one day be feasible.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p> Theory start when a hypothesi…tag:www.thinkatheist.com,2011-12-16:1982180:Comment:10016172011-12-16T03:11:52.938ZArtorhttp://www.thinkatheist.com/profile/Artor
<p>Theory start when a <em>hypothesis</em> has been proven. For that to happen, it must be testable, and suggest predictions that can be tested. Your "hypothesis" is as untestable as your religion. While it might, in the most unimaginably remote chance, be true, I'm calling bullshit. Fail.</p>
<p>Theory start when a <em>hypothesis</em> has been proven. For that to happen, it must be testable, and suggest predictions that can be tested. Your "hypothesis" is as untestable as your religion. While it might, in the most unimaginably remote chance, be true, I'm calling bullshit. Fail.</p> You do realise that matter wi…tag:www.thinkatheist.com,2011-12-16:1982180:Comment:10016962011-12-16T02:48:50.868ZEoganachthttp://www.thinkatheist.com/profile/Peter669
<p>You do realise that matter with its electrons stripped away (all of them not just the valence electrons) is considered plasma, right? As in only able to exist at high temperatures and it will oxidise any nearby matter. And to say that it is nonbaryonic is absurd. I think I will follow occam's razor with this one and say that this is something much more mundane.</p>
<p></p>
<p><em>Also this technology could also come from elsewhere in the multiverse where it is ordered by a different…</em></p>
<p>You do realise that matter with its electrons stripped away (all of them not just the valence electrons) is considered plasma, right? As in only able to exist at high temperatures and it will oxidise any nearby matter. And to say that it is nonbaryonic is absurd. I think I will follow occam's razor with this one and say that this is something much more mundane.</p>
<p></p>
<p><em>Also this technology could also come from elsewhere in the multiverse where it is ordered by a different physics.</em></p>
<p>This is blind speculation. Saying that this object is isn't composed of normal matter and it doesn't follow the laws of physics as we know them is ridiculous. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.</p> Ok, I believe that you are sa…tag:www.thinkatheist.com,2011-12-16:1982180:Comment:10016112011-12-16T02:04:34.879ZMichaelhttp://www.thinkatheist.com/profile/Michael456
<p>Ok, I believe that you are saying that the building on the left is the Russia Hotel.</p>
<p>Possibly, however there are two problems, the tower has a stepped feature that the actual tower does not have. Also there is a wide bright linear feature on the building in the photo, that is much bigger and relatively brighter than that shown in the close-up photo. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ok, I believe that you are saying that the building on the left is the Russia Hotel.</p>
<p>Possibly, however there are two problems, the tower has a stepped feature that the actual tower does not have. Also there is a wide bright linear feature on the building in the photo, that is much bigger and relatively brighter than that shown in the close-up photo. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p> Remember we also had our own…tag:www.thinkatheist.com,2011-12-15:1982180:Comment:10011242011-12-15T02:03:10.598ZMichaelhttp://www.thinkatheist.com/profile/Michael456
<p>Remember we also had our own UFO flap over Washington D.C., the Air Force in hot pursuit in the forties.</p>
<p>Remember we also had our own UFO flap over Washington D.C., the Air Force in hot pursuit in the forties.</p> I will note that and see if i…tag:www.thinkatheist.com,2011-12-15:1982180:Comment:10013112011-12-15T01:51:07.377ZMichaelhttp://www.thinkatheist.com/profile/Michael456
<p>I will note that and see if it is included in any released reports.</p>
<p> But frankly, I still did not see the intact Russia building in the video</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I will note that and see if it is included in any released reports.</p>
<p> But frankly, I still did not see the intact Russia building in the video</p>
<p> </p> All of this is anecdotal unti…tag:www.thinkatheist.com,2011-12-15:1982180:Comment:10010482011-12-15T01:46:46.407ZMichaelhttp://www.thinkatheist.com/profile/Michael456
<p>All of this is anecdotal until the expert reports are furnished. The Belgium UFO flap has the experts weighing in but heretofore no conclusions. Yet we do not need another Jules Verne classic to inspire us in the next great leap in technology.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>All of this is anecdotal until the expert reports are furnished. The Belgium UFO flap has the experts weighing in but heretofore no conclusions. Yet we do not need another Jules Verne classic to inspire us in the next great leap in technology.</p>
<p> </p> Then you didn't look very har…tag:www.thinkatheist.com,2011-12-15:1982180:Comment:10011192011-12-15T01:37:22.843ZKevin Duganhttp://www.thinkatheist.com/profile/KevinDugan
<p>Then you didn't look very hard. Here are the links straight out of the article James D linked, so you don't have to do the work:</p>
<p><a href="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID2383/images/MoscowUFO-300.jpg" target="_blank">http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID2383/images/MoscowUFO-300.jpg</a></p>
<p>^ screenshot from video.…</p>
<p></p>
<p>Then you didn't look very hard. Here are the links straight out of the article James D linked, so you don't have to do the work:</p>
<p><a href="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID2383/images/MoscowUFO-300.jpg" target="_blank">http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID2383/images/MoscowUFO-300.jpg</a></p>
<p>^ screenshot from video.</p>
<p><a href="http://englishrussia.com/2006/10/04/moscow-hotel-russia-nowadays/" target="_blank">http://englishrussia.com/2006/10/04/moscow-hotel-russia-nowadays/</a></p>
<p>^ building in video.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossiya_Hotel,_Moscow" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossiya_Hotel,_Moscow</a></p>
<p>^ proof the hotel was demolished in 2007.</p>