Thursday, September 27, 2012

I can’t believe
I read the whole thing – all five volumes and nearly 5,000 pages! For the
uninitiated, I’m talking about the series A Song of Fire and Ice by George R. R. Martin, otherwise known
by its television adaptation, The Game of Thrones. Am I satisfied? NO! It was a game of
stubbornness and survival on my part to make it to the end, independent of the
quality of the complex story lines and often one-dimensional characters. I
expected at any moment to die by slicing my finger as I rabidly turned the
pages to get to the next inexplicable morsel.

And gee, I can
hardly wait to get trapped into reading the next volume to see how many more of
my favorite characters get senselessly killed off. Don’t the good guys ever win
or is the plot strategy one of random variations and mutations to achieve
survival of the fittest ala evolutionary dynamics? Actually, I think it’s more
about making money through creating an ever-expanding universe of characters
and plot lines.

Aside from the
racy nature of the television show with nudity and explicit sexual activity as
a guaranteed hook to enhance audience ratings, the underlying theme of The
Game of Thrones – or
perhaps better said, moans and groans – is that of a feudal society blended
together with fantasy and the supernatural. But mostly it’s about bad-boy
behavior to achieve domination and wealth for the few over the many coupled
with religious intolerance. Does that sound familiar?

Yep! Even as I
write these words, Syria is morphing from a condition of genocide into a
condition of civil war fed by competitor states and ideologies. Religious
fanatics get upset and riot because someone challenges their beliefs by mocking
their chosen prophet with a stupid video. And the threat of a worldwide
pandemic continues unchecked as a new strain of SARS has been detected and HIV
continues to ravage the African continent. The economic meltdown caused by
excessive greed and uncontrolled financial leveraging is being refueled by a
form of austerity budgeting that is guaranteed to choke innovation and economic
growth. Dirty bombs, biochemical warfare, computer viruses, West Nile virus,
and a host of other such scourges pummel us daily into expecting our imminent
demise. Who needs the fantasy world of The Game of Thrones when we live in the real thing? Even
George R. R. Martin would have trouble coming up with such plot lines.

But wait! We
don’t have a rebirth of dragons or a re-emergence of blue-eyed zombies looming
on the horizon to bring a metaphorical winter into our lives. Or do we?

It’s called
autonomous warfare. High overhead, stealthy Predator drones silently stalk our
every move, ready to unleash on the unwary a blast of fire and death from a
Hellfire missile. It’s the modern equivalent of the dragon, a centerpiece of
the Fire and Ice
series. Talk to a few of those dead jihadist in Pakistan if you don’t believe
these modern dragons are real. Or ask the Israeli’s how they feel about Iran’s
reputed development of a long-range drone.

Of course,
drones can be used to improve the general welfare of us all by tracking the
movement of drug traffickers along the Texas border with Mexico or, better, by
flying into hurricanes to provide extended real time monitoring. If we put our
minds to it, who knows what benevolent uses we can find for these dragons.

But what about
blue-eyed zombies? Do they live among us waiting to emerge with the coming
winter? I think yes!

It’s called
synthetic biology by some and is equivalent in spirit to the great advances
made by chemists over the past century through the creation of a vast array of
new substances and materials including plastics and a cornucopia of medicines
and drugs – not to mention napalm. The game for synthetic biologists is to take
DNA strands and reconnect them in various ways to produce an engineered
sequence with specific attributes. Ultimately, engineered “lifeforms” will
emerge. Of course, as we learn more about how to connect such synthetic
biological systems to nanoscale electro-mechanical systems coupled to
“intelligent” computer systems, a new construct will emerge. And exactly what
is that new construct? Why it’s the modern version of the blue-eyed zombie
gracing the pages of Fire and Ice.

Cynicism, no
matter its form, is never a healthy lifestyle choice, but sometimes a dose of
it helps us to recalibrate exactly what it is we are doing, or not doing, to
ourselves. From that perspective, I’m glad I made it through the Fire and
Ice series. It reminded
me that feudalism and its trappings, especially as practiced in modern-day
Washington DC, aren’t quite so dead as we thought and that fantasy is really in
the eye of the beholder, whether it be drones as dragons or synthetic lifeforms
as blue-eyed zombies.

And George,
could you please let one good guy survive the fire and ice?

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Elmer Fudd never
was fooled by Bugs Bunny’s double talk. It just seemed that way to folks not
paying attention. And that brings to mind Mitt Romney and his comments about
not being responsible for the 47% of Americans “who believe they are victims” –
oops, he meant to say he favors small government! As Foghorn Leghorn would say,
“that boy’s as sharp as a bowling ball.”

Now some of you
will have a cow at this old cowboy from Texas poking fun at a presidential candidate,
but I say to you: “eat more chikin!” I didn’t pick this dawg to run for
president. Or as Foghorn famously said, “That dawg is strictly G.I. – gibbering
idiot!”

Being an
irreverent rascal myself, I’ve always enjoyed a good turn of phrase and the innovation
and creativity involved in catchphrases, slogans, and infamous quotes –
especially those from the characters in The Looney Tunes Show. Sadly the slices
of real life embodied in those old cartoons and their characters are no longer
a part of our current culture, having been thrown into the dustbin of history
by political correctness and concerns about adolescent violence as a result of
watching them. I guess that explains my irreverence.

The evolution of
those wacky old cartoons and the good story telling of authors like Mark Twain
into boring, predictable sitcoms with their stupid laugh tracks coupled with
the socially responsible cartoons on the Cartoon Network just doesn’t work for
me – not to mention the emergence of the polar opposite: violent computer
games. I get the underlying point and accept that we must continue to move
towards a higher level of civilization where responsible behavior is the norm.
I have long advocated for just that end result.

But
unfortunately, as Mitt Romney and the extreme right wing continue to
demonstrate, the real world doesn’t work like most people want it to work.
Responsible behavior has been replaced by the calculated lie; by denying the
basic facts and discoveries of science, sociology, or economics; by pretending
that the rich and successful got to their position in life without the help of
others; and by a level of greed and avarice that transcends common sense. Is
anyone surprised that a large number of Harvard students recently cheated on a
take-home exam?

Viewed through
the eyes of an old dog like me, the modern scene seems like an instant replay
of those old Looney Tunes cartoons – especially the political drama in the
presidential election. At any moment, I expect Romney to blurt out as regards
his failure to fully disclose his tax returns: “Don’t you, I say, don’t you
call ME a chicken – you chicken!”
Even better, he should take Bugs Bunnies advice and take “that left toin at
Albaquerque.”

Personally, I
think modern society would benefit from a refresher course in Looney Tunes.
It’s a great training ground for the real world. But you’re thinking, “Stop
right there, varmint. Don’t rush me. I’m a-thinking… and my head hurts.” Well,
great horny-toadies! Maybe you’re right and it’s time for me to let those little
doggies git along.

And about my
admonition for you to “eat more chikin,” just remember what Foghorn Leghorn
said, “Ah’m a rooster, son, not a chicken! Pay at-ah say, pay attention, boy!
Ah’m talkin’ to ya! Kid doesn’t listen to a word Ah say.”

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Words matter!
Take, for example, the use of the word “matter” by the physics community. We
have “matter” which is the regular stuff that makes up the universe – energy
excluded – and we have anti-matter and dark matter. Anti-matter is, of course,
matter, but just not “matter” matter. Unfortunately, as any science fiction fan
knows, anti-matter and matter annihilate each other to create a flash of
energy.

But then there
is the little problem of the conversion of energy into matter and vice versa.
So does that mean that energy is matter? Or does it even matter that we
distinguish one form of matter from another?

Syllogistic
wordplay aside, we live in a world where words and their meaning make a
difference – or do they? My favorite example of this antithetic conundrum is
the traditional welcome speech given by an appropriately chosen dignitary or
two at the beginning of a conference or meeting.

When first faced
with performing said task over a decade or two ago, I panicked and spent an
evening reading classic speeches and preparing a welcome speech for the ages.
The next morning, no one listened to my speech as they slurped away on bad
coffee delivered in Styrofoam cups covered with plastic lids and dutifully attempted
to keep their eyes open in a futile effort to prepare themselves for the main
attraction – the opening keynote speech.

Lesson learned,
but still committed to success, I began collecting notes on what others said
and did in their welcome speeches, especially since I could not find a “how to”
book on said genre. And here they are, my collected ensemble of “talking
points” and tactics for a successful run-of-the-mill welcome speech.

1.Finish before the allotted time – usually
much too long – to give the illusion of being ahead of schedule since nothing
ever starts on time. This makes the meeting chairperson happy.

2.Say absolutely nothing of substance other
than the word “welcome.”

3.Thank the Chamber of Commerce (or the
accident of your wonderful locality – Florida in the winter and New Hampshire
in the summer) for the weather with proper blame for bad weather.

4.Note the magnificent facility in which
the conference/meeting is being held, compliments of (insert: federal earmark,
gracious donor or sponsor, state funding, and so forth, but ignore random luck)

5.Invite participants to tour the campus,
meet students and faculty, and experience the unique atmosphere of your
university, unlike any other on Planet Earth.

6.If relevant and you need to take more
time, mention the grand master plan for the campus and the wondrous new
facilities to be built. Scale the grandeur of the presentation to fit the time
slot.

7.Make a banal remark about how important
the conference topic is to (insert: world peace, the welfare of humankind, the
fishing industry, or a suitable substitute).

8.Assure the conference participants that
you’ve read their agenda (be sure to hold it up for them to see that you
actually have a copy) and that a great time will be had by all.

9.And don’t forget to mention that you are
going to have to dash off to another meeting (pull up your coat sleeve and
examine your watch with a doleful, but disgusted look) – especially given that
you have no personal intention of being bored to death over the next few
minutes before quietly slipping out.

The clever ones
among you might add another topic or two, but this list will carry the day for
you. Trust me! I’ve tested this list on many occasions and successfully punched
the time clock.

But then I’ve
never been much of a conformist and more a contrarian. Punching the time clock
and looking out over a sea of sleepy faces while blathering away on my canned
talking points always seemed like such a waste of time. And then the epiphany
occurred. What I needed was an anti-welcome speech!

No! Not a
negative speech, but an anti-speech similar in nature to anti-matter. And how
does one accomplish that, you ask? It goes like this.

First you
announce to the audience that you want to do something different this morning.
You tell them that as a scientist, you’ve made a study of the phenomena of
“welcome speeches” and you want to report back to them your findings. Then you
pick up the paper with the above list of talking points, adjust your glasses,
and proceed to read the points to them. At appropriate moments, you pause, look
up from the paper, and insert a jest or two. For example, I routinely stop
after point 2 above and ask the following question: “so how am I doing so far?”
It’s guaranteed to get a laugh and wake them up.

And, of course,
at the end, you pause, pull up your sleeve to reveal your watch, shout “Oh, my
God,” and rush off the stage.

Sadly, this
strategy of giving an anti-welcome speech seems to work best with STEM folks
and not with attendees from the liberal or fine arts. I’m not sure what this
says about the technical community and their sense of humor.

And then there
is the issue of whether this form of speech is actually a “speech” or a
“meta-speech?” Hmmm, I’ll leave that issue to the philosophers among us.

In closing, I
feel compelled to relate a funny, but tragic story about the anti-welcome
speech. I once gave the anti-welcome speech to a group of regional chemistry
department chairs. Just as I finished, the dean rushed in on “dean’s time” –
meaning you always make it just in the nick of time – to give his/her welcome
speech. Not having heard my critique of the said genre, he/she proceeded to
give a perfect rendition, much to the amusement of the assembled chairs.
Needless to say, it was a welcome-speech combo that they have never forgotten
and a clear example of an anti-welcome speech annihilating a welcome speech
with a burst of humor.

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Building and
maintaining bridges across rivers, creeks, and watercourses has always been a
challenge for both engineers and local governments. Witness Riley Hill, one of
my distant ancestors whose low bid in 1861 to construct a bridge across Caraway
Creek in Randolph County, North Carolina, won him the contract. To his dismay,
the bridge fell down. Of course, he tried to collect damages from the county
court, but no such luck. Sad to say, but getting wet, figuratively speaking,
seems to run in the family genes.

My own
experience occurred on the evening of 2 December 2009 following a reception
with the British Ambassador at the famed British Embassy Ambassador’s residence
in Washington DC. Flanked by over 100 other guests, all dressed in their best
business attire, my contingent emerged onto Massachusetts Avenue Northwest into
an absolute downpour reminiscent of the biblical deluge. Competition for
hailing a passing taxi was fierce as each party established territorial rights
for a segment of the curb. Few were deterred from their aggressive behavior by
the tidal waves of water splashed on the sidewalks by fast-moving traffic. And
almost no one had any raingear or umbrellas.

Mercifully,
after some thirty minutes or more of being fully baptized in the waters of
Washington DC, a taxi picked up our intrepid crew and delivered us dripping wet
to our hotel, unfazed by our grand adventure and eager for the morning to
arrive. After all, we were endowed with the entrepreneurial spirit to succeed
no matter the hardships. And what better venue to display that spirit than at
the Annual University Startups Conference hosted by the National Council of Entrepreneurial Tech
Transfer (NCET2).

For me, the next
morning began with my welcome
speech since The University of Texas System was co-sponsoring the
conference along with the University of Maryland. Little did the audience know
that my shoes were still damp and stayed that way for the better part of the
first day. Somehow the hotel hair dryer just didn’t get the job done.

Unlike many
conferences, the annual NCET2 meeting in Washington is closely akin to an old
fashioned Gospel revival meeting where saints and sinners come together to
experience the entrepreneurial spirit. Led by the irrepressible and
effervescent Tony Stanco, the director of NCET2, the conference proceeds as a
sequence of fast-paced speeches and panels where “being there” is more
important than what one says. It’s the ultimate networking experience among the
big-time players as over 400 venture capitalists, startup entrepreneurs,
university administrators, economic development specialists, federal SBIR
managers, and a host of other characters gather to be seen. It’s the
quintessential epitome of building bridges between and among a smorgasbord of
people. And it’s all for the purpose of stimulating and accelerating the
university startup enterprise.

But NCET2 is
more than just an entity hosting a conference. According to its website and
literature, “NCET2 connects investors, economic development organizations,
public and private funds, and tech transfer professionals in building
communities of innovation at universities.” Furthermore, “NCET2 promotes best
practices in the creation and funding of university startups by supporting
entrepreneurship and providing entrepreneurial education.”

Along with its
annual conference, NCET2 has a number of activities designed to achieve its goals.
These activities are collected and accessed under the umbrella Internet website
Research Commercialization and SBIR Center.
There are three principal components:

3.Faculty Startup Program: This activity is
designed to assist faculty and recently graduated students in the business of
starting up a company.

Two features of
the NCET2 website are notable. First, there is a listing of university
commercialization activities with appropriate hyperlinks. These links serve as
a one-stop-shopping tool to enhance networking and connectivity of all the
players in the university startup enterprise. Second is a University Startup
Map. This zoom-capable map of the globe displays a “balloon” for each startup
in the database appropriately anchored to its location. When “clicked,” the
balloon yields the name of the company. While the use of such “dashboard”
features and technologies is still experimental with respect to their efficacy
for enhancing entrepreneurship and communities of innovation in the innovation
marketplace, it is an important step in the right direction to connect the
dots.

About Me

Keith McDowell is a scientist and research administrator widely known for his research in theoretical chemical physics on quantum dissipative systems and for his leadership as the vice chancellor for research and technology transfer at The University of Texas System as well as vice president for research at The University of Texas at Arlington and The University of Alabama. Dr. McDowell is a graduate of Wake Forest University and Harvard University. An Alfred P. Sloan Fellow and awardee of the University of Texas Chancellor's Award for Teaching, Dr. McDowell is currently a retired professor of chemistry from The University of Texas at Arlington residing in Austin, Texas. Keith is an expert genealogist with several books and manuscripts to his credit (www.mcdowellgenealogy.com) and an avid mountaineer with over 500 ascents spanning forty years.

New eBook by McDowell!

Innovation! It’s the cure-all for an ailing America. So says conventional wisdom. And the engine of innovation is the American university – the wellspring of new knowledge to fill the technology and commercialization pipeline. But universities and their faculty are under attack as being poor stewards of what some perceive as a new mission. Who is right? What is the real story? Go Forth and Innovate! reveals a personal perspective on the inner workings of the modern research university and its role in the innovation ecosystem.