Hi folks,
I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 24th
of February, 2012. For newcomers, help yourself to the website,
cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and you’ll find hundreds and hundreds of free
audios for download, and hopefully, you’ll start to understand the system in
which you’ve been born into, a system designed by experts, again, these experts
are just everywhere. Always have been, by the way, and how about a
hundred years ago or so, a group got together. I’m sure they already ran
the old age and they’re into the New Age now, but they planned to take over the
world’s resources, and bring in a planned society, the way it should be run,
you see. The way that life should be run for everyone. With lots of
experts running us from cradle to grave, and meanwhile, they would take over
the resources of the whole planet themselves, not to redistribute it equally or
anything like that, but simply the better people should be in charge of
ownership, and not the fuzzy types down below. And that’s literally what
it is. And the mainstream media covers for them, because they belong to
the same organizations. They’re owned by the same big organizations and
foundations that own the nongovernmental organizations, and all these armies and
armies of protestors that can be drummed up to go anywhere across the world at
a moment’s notice.

So, we’re run really by proxy in a sense, at least the way
it seems to be right now. We’re living in a strange transition period as
it’s called. And they actually call it the Great Transition. This
is the transition period where we’re getting trained to go into the new system
which is vastly different from the old system, under guises of global warming
or cooling or climate change or resources scarcity. That type of
thing. That’s how they’re doing it now. And they’re training the
children in school, so they’ll grow up thinking it’s all quite natural to own
nothing, to live in Agenda 21’s little rent-a-shack places, where there’s no personal
property, no private property, and no private cars. Essential vehicles
only. And we all get down at mid-day, every day, and worship the Jolly
Green Giant. Basically, that’s what you’re getting brought up into.
So, that’s what the wars are all about and everything else is all about.

So, as I
say, help yourself to the audios. There’s lots of them there.
There’s also transcripts on all the sites listed on
cuttingthroughthematrix.com, for print-up. And you can go into
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts in other languages. And you
can support me now by buying the books and discs at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com, because I don’t bring on advertisers as
guests. I don’t push politics, because, believe you me, if politics
works, you’d never be in the mess you’re in now. Never would have
been. Politics is owned by the one system at the top. Always has
been. We have never had democracy. Never. So, you can buy the
books and discs, as I say. From the US and Canada, you can use a personal
check. You can use an international postal money order. You
can use PayPal. Some people just send cash. And across the world,
you’ve got Western Union, Money Gram, and once again, PayPal.

What I try
and do is simply go through the histories of the big organizations that
blossomed openly in the 1800s, and then right through into the 20th
century, and they published lots of their plans, especially the members who
partook of the international meetings that they had and still have across the
whole world. Almost every week there’s some international organization
having a meeting, under the auspices of the United Nations. And they’re
quite open about where they want to take the world. And so, everything
else is really fluff. All, everything else in mainstream is simply distraction,
especially emotional distraction. If they can get you into an emotive
argument over something, you can’t think logically. You can’t keep your
head and think through it, and think, why are they doing this? What do
they gain? That’s what you always have to ask yourself, and always try
and keep cool and become detached. Back with more, after this break.

Hi folks,
I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And it’s amazing, this big
system that’s been around for such a long time. We grow up in it, and we
expect, of course, for some strange reason, that media will tell us the truth
about the big things that we should really know about, because they matter so
much, but media doesn’t do that. And I’ve gone through some articles in
the past, where certain journalists themselves, who had contracts to big
newscasters, were not allowed to air their stuff, because it was too
revealing. One of them was about Monsanto, apparently, I think it
was. And I think it was Fox News. They’d taken on a team of journalists,
signed a contract, and then they didn’t allow them to show any of their
stuff. So, the team went all the way to the Supreme Court of the US, and
the judge ruled that the news doesn’t have to tell the truth. It’s
nothing about telling the truth, in fact. It’s just data. Most of
it’s propaganda. There’s no law written anywhere that newscasters must
tell the public the truth. And that ties in, of course, exactly with what
Brzezinski talked about, a long time ago. He said that shortly the public
will be unable to think for themselves or reason for themselves. He says,
the time is coming. It was actually there then, but he says, the time is
coming when they’ll expect the media, especially television media, to do their
reasoning for them as well. And of course, they don’t do that.
Well, they will do reasoning. They’ll bring you to the conclusions that
their masters want you to arrive at. It’s done very simply, generally by
omitting half of the story. Here’s the other side of the story, you
see. You never get the other side of the story.

So, we’ve
been brought down to a very primitive level of what you call news making.
And unfortunately we’ve forgotten, our grandparents didn’t forget that
newspapers and newscasters were owned by big corporations and you could never
trust them. But they took a generation to drive that out of us, thinking
they’re all nice people, you see. And people really do believe that
now. In fact, they’re so naïve now, they would wonder why the media would
want to lie to you. That’s how naïve they are. Big, massive
multi-billionaire corporations would lie to you. Why would they want to
do that? I wonder. But we’re ruled, very, very well, by a system, a
system established a long time ago. And this system, as I say, knew darn
well that they’d have revolutions every four or five or six years, if they
didn’t come up with a new system to fool the public. And they called it
democracy, you see.

Democracy
by the way, is never a static thing. It’s not written in stone, and
that’s it. It’s elastic. And, every few years, they’ll reinterpret
in university levels, they’ll reinterpret what democracy is, an elastic band,
you see. And they’re still doing it today. So, the only right in a
democracy is to elect someone. That came out in Canadian courts, by the
way, when someone, in a local government, took a councilor to task, because he
went against all the promises he’d made, and he did things to the detriment of
the public. And so, this fellow took him to court, and same thing
happened. It’s happened elsewhere. That, basically, the judge says,
the only, the only thing that a citizen has to do, and has a right to do, is
vote someone in. After that, it’s up to the person who’s voted in,
whatever they do, they can do whatever they want. That’s democracy for
you.

And
therefore, it’s been a very easy game to play on the public. We hear lots
of beautiful, wonderful speeches, and if any of them, from any one over the
half century had ever come true, we’d be living pretty well today. So
they talk good, good talk, but they don’t walk, as I say. And it never
comes into fruition. We’re kept in the dark, most of the time, because,
you see, masters in all ages, from thousands of years to the present want a
passive, an ignorant population. You can prattle off the whole dictionary
in a conversation, and yet still be ignorant of what’s really going on.
And you think you’re educated. Lots of tricks to this, you see.

Another
part of you too, not being a psychopathic type yourself, hopefully, you can’t
imagine people being so nasty and mean-spirited as to get together in clubs,
let’s call them clubs or big meetings, and scheme up unpleasant things to do to
you, including bankrupting you along with the rest of the nation, when
required, or simply putting you down as cannon fodder for the next hundred
years of war. You can’t imagine anyone doing that. Therefore, no
one, you think, can do that. Oh, but they do. They really, really
do. I’ve gone through the histories, especially in the US, of the real
histories of the US. Not the stuff you get in Hollywood, where everyone
apparently was a cowboy, but the real histories was a takeoff from
Europe. In Europe, across Europe, in the 1800s especially, you had
factory towns all over the place. Most housing for the people, and that
was the majority of housing, was privately owned. High, extortionate
rates for little rooms, where you’re crowded into. Factory towns owned
everything. And of course, anybody who talked about a strike was literally
hunted down and often hung.

I remember
the last one in Scotland was in the early 1900s, who thought about getting a
union together, were actually hunted, all over the country. That shows
you the lengths they go to warn the rest not to do it. And they hung them
publicly in a place, I think it was called Sterling. It was the same in
the US. The same in the US. And the US factory towns gave you just
enough money, just like a fixed society where everything is rigged. And
in Britain, believe you me, it was like this too. Where the money that
you earned would be gone into the company store, just to feed your family and
pay your rent. So, it all went around in a circle, back to the
boss. And you couldn’t get enough money to save up and move out of an
area, if you were in a mining town, for instance. And you were stuck
there, basically. 16 hour shifts sometimes. And no days off.
It doesn’t matter how many years you’d worked there. There was no holiday
days for you. And no sick pays. Nothing like that. And that
went right up until the 1970s, by the way, in the US, across different places,
for those who don’t know it.

And,
whenever there was trouble, of course, the boss man would get all his Masonic
pals together that owned the towns, etc, and all the cops would be on board
with him as well. And that shows you right there and then who they
serve. The taxpayer pays for it all. The taxpayer is the guy who’s
going to get the bash on the head with the big stick or shot by the very guys that
he’s paying the salaries of. So, that’s the real history of not just
America, and Canada too, they had strike breakers here too, but also across the
whole of Europe.

And so,
they came in with this gentler, kinder type of system, first in Europe.
It was last to go in America, but first in Europe, and they kept drumming it up
about democracy and people’s rights. And gradually it kind of faded away,
not out of reality, but out of our everyday sight. And that’s how it was
really, really done.

I mentioned
a movie before, people should see, it’s called Matewan. A very
good movie about actual events that happened when people went on strike in a
mining town, in the USA, and how the strikebreakers came in with the orders
just to gun them all down, while the sheriffs all looked the other way.
That was the idea of it. And then, that one Harlan USA. It’s
a very good documentary. It goes into the 1970s strikes in a mining town
in Kentucky, and how, again, there’s all the cops on the side of the bosses.
And there’s these guys, who didn’t even have running water, by the way, by this
time, in their homes. In the 1970s, America. It’s just
astonishing. But Hollywood has given a great counter to that. As I
say, everyone was a cowboy apparently and singing Roy Rogers songs.

We’ve
never, ever, ever had a freedom. There’s always been an elite, and it’s
been well written about by people who were part of that elite. Lord
Bertrand Russell is an excellent source to start, because he was about the 3rd
or 4th Earl of something or other. His predecessors all had
worked for the British government in high capacity. And he talked about
this new scientific tyranny they’d bring in. That’s what he wanted.
He says, a scientific tyranny where experts rule us from cradle to grave.
That will keep the people quiet and happy and in their places, basically.
And he went through it to a lot of extent. A lot of them also went into
the Socialist Party, because they were all onboard with this agenda. They
were getting funded by the banks, the same as everybody else was. And
their idea was to bring out the perfect society, but gradually killing off all
the useless eaters, as they call them, that’s the term they use, over a
specific period of time. And people like Russell mentioned the food,
using poisons in the food for sterilization, and reducing life
expectancy. He said also the water supply. We could add things to
the water supply. Have a good look and ask your local council what’s in
your water. And get it in writing, by the way. Get a
print-out. And also the needle. They would use the needle, you
see. Inoculations. To make sure we weren’t just too smart for our
own good, basically.

This is a
war, that’s been fought for an awful, awful long time, those who have power and
those who don’t. It’s been going on for thousands of years. There’s
nothing new in it. Plato himself wrote quite extensively about authority
and obedience to authority, and how the state authorized all cultural changes
from the top down. Not from the bottom up. Because, if it was from
the bottom up, it would belong to the people, and it might have unforeseen
circumstances. So, you always, your fashions, everything, your stage
plays were all sanctioned from the top down, just like today. All the
filth you’re watching on television is from the top down, because they want a
degenerate society right now. And they’ve got it by the way.
They’ve got it. Degenerate. By design.

We’ve never
had a time really when we’ve not been spied upon. Even before the
computer, I’ve gone into some of Jacques Ellul’s exposés on how government
worked and managed the cities and the public. In the 1950s they had
thousands of spies, 5,000 alone just in the inner City of London, full-time
spies who went around bars and coffee shops listening to gossip. And it
was the same everywhere else. Back with more, after this.

Hi folks,
I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking about reality.
Reality. We actually don’t like reality too much, because it’s not too
pleasant, really. We like happy endings, and we like nice smiling faces
on the news shows. And, I don’t know why they all shout now. Have
you noticed that? All the newscasters kind of yell, like they do with the
entertainment women that come up there. And they yell. They’ve got 200
amps sitting behind them in amplifying power, but they’ve got to yell.
You know, you could whisper through that and hear them perfectly clearly, but
they’ve got to yell. This is the new way of getting through to you.
It’s also a form, almost, of talking down to you like you’re a child, in a
sense, or you’re half deaf. Anyway, these are not by mistake. All
these things are thought up by psychologists to grab your attention and to put
you into almost a subversive mode, or subservient mode I should say, you should
be subversive but you’re into a subservient mode to listen to them.
Because, when people yell at you, you generally buckle down. And
everything is done by design. Nothing is missed.

As I say,
Ellul mentioned this too, about all the spies throughout Britain, and he said,
all the first world countries. And they’ve had them all since the 50s,
with Cardex systems, the old card systems that were on a sort of wheel.
And every one had a spy in your street. All along. Who would talk
to the cops and just give them the gossip. And it was the gossip that
they built up their cases on, you see. And everyone was being monitored
then, because, you see, government is very, very worried about you. Are
you happy being a nobody and talking nonsense? Or, are you maybe becoming
a somebody, because you’re thinking to yourself, and your brain is working, and
you can communicate to others? Then you’re a problem. And Bertrand
Russell said that very thing, that those people who they couldn’t take under
their wing and recruit into the higher level, if they were willing to leave
their parents and their whole class behind him, he said, those who wouldn’t do
it would have to be eliminated, he said. Bumped off. That’s how
much, that’s how seriously they take it all at the top. It’s never
changed.

And, as I
say too, you’ve got to see Matewan. I’ll say that again.
Plus, Harlan County USA. And it’s a 1976 documentary, to show you how the
US really was. And it was like that pretty well across a whole lot of the
country, these factory towns. The Rockefellers had lots of them
too. They all did. And you were basically a slave in your own, it
wasn’t even your own home I suppose. You were renting it. But the
people stood up, and many of them died for it, by the way, because
strikebreakers came in with guns in their hip pockets. You can actually
see them coming in, that. And the cops standing and looking the other
way, in case any shooting started against the poor peasants. And that’s
the way it’s always, always been, in reality.

So, here’s
an article here about:

Big Brother Returns to Orwell's
England

(Alan: Well, I would say that actually it’s the wrong
title. He’s always been there. It says:)

It seems the U.S. government is not the only one
sporting a Big Brother demeanor. The British government is now revisiting
previously considered plans to create databases that would enable spy agencies
to monitor emails, phone calls, and text messages as well as websites visited
by everyone in the United Kingdom.

(A:
In other words, you see, they never stop what they’re doing, even if they
pretend that they have.)

the scheme would be set up under
anti-terrorism laws, in much the same way the PATRIOT Act functions in the
United States. UK officials contend that its goal is to closely monitor
suspects before the 2012 London Olympics in July.

(A: Why not scrap the Olympics, because there’s
very few folk that watch them now anyway? And it costs so much money.
They’ve never made a profit for anybody, except the guys at the very, very
top. The rest of the public have to pay it off for years, all the debt
that’s left. Anyway:)

The proposal — conceived by MI5
(Military Intelligence 5, a government agency dealing with domestic threats),
MI6 (which combats overseas threats), and the Government Communications
Headquarters (GCHQ) — could be announced as early as May. Those agencies would
be given access to records kept by companies such as Vodafone and British
Telecom. British spy agencies would be permitted not only to evaluate all
communications exchanged, but also to match Internet browsing histories to IP
addresses.

(A: This is the same thing they’ve rolled out
across the whole darn world.)

Under the plan, communications
networks would be required to store the data for a full year.

(A: They said that years ago too. They were
doing it then.)

The proposal includes even social
networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter,

(A: Which are all part of the NSA. I added
that part in, because it’s true.)

as well as gaming sites.

For the first time, the security
services will have widespread access to information about who has been
communicating with each other on social networking sites such as Facebook.

Direct messages between
subscribers to websites such as Twitter would also be stored, as well as
communications between players in online video games.

Naturally such a proposal has
drawn the ire of freedom-lovers in England. Jim Killock, executive director of
the Open Rights Group, a civil liberties campaign organization, declared, “This
would be a systematic effort to spy on all of our digital communications. No
state in history has been able to gather the level of information proposed —
it’s a way of collecting everything about who we talk to just in case something
turns up.”

(A: Well, they’ve been doing this folks for
years. I’ve read articles here where they’ve been doing it. They
actually give them from the internet providers. They hand this stuff to
universities. They’ve been studying all your emails and who you talk to,
and doing your cluster groups, they call them, for the last five, ten year.)

Gus Hosein, of Privacy
International, pointed out,

This will be ripe for hacking.
Every hacker, every malicious threat, every foreign government is going to want
access to this. And if communications providers have a government mandate to
start collecting this information they will be incredibly tempted to start
monitoring this data themselves so they can compete with Google and Facebook.

No. Google and Facebook belong to them too. It’s all part
of international security. It’s not made up by little guys at university
that’s handed about ten, fifteen, twenty million dollars to start it up
with. Are you kidding? Rags to riches? Good story. Back
with more, after this break.

Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And talking about Big Brother. You
know, it’s always been here. Big Brother, and Son of Big Brother, and so
on, and so on. And it says here:

The Open Rights Group is now
circulating an online petition against the controversial program, calling it
“pointless,” “expensive,” and “illegal.” The petition explains, “This
Kafka-esque 'Intercept Modernisation Plan,' was stopped near the end of the
last government, but was quietly revived in the 2010 Spending Review

(A: It’s amazing how they slip it in somewhere else.
They always do. They never, ever stop what they want to do, do
they? Never, ever. So they
slipped it in:)

as the 'Communications
Capabilities Development Programme.' Now, closed-door discussions have been
revealed: legislation will be proposed in May.”

Those who sign the petition

(A: And the link is on this one I’ll put up tonight at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com)

are putting their name to the
following statement: “I do not want the government to try to intercept every UK
email, Facebook account and online communication. It would be pointless — as it
will be easy for criminals to encrypt and evade — and expensive. It would also
be illegal: mass surveillance would be a breach of our fundamental right to
privacy.

(A: Do we actually have that? Who told you
that?)

Please cancel the Communications
Capabilities Development Plan.”

(A: I’d drop the please out of that.)

As alluded to earlier, this is not
the first time the British government has considered such an extreme proposal.
In 2008, the government announced its intent to launch a massive central
database that would have gathered information on every text, email, and phone
call circulated in the United Kingdom, as well as every website visited.

(A: Well, they’ve been doing all that, all along.
See, they don’t need a bill for that. They do it regardless. You do
know that. It’s even in the movies.)

That plan, called the
“Interception Modernisation Programme,” would have permitted the GCHQ, where
the Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) functions, to place a “live tap” on every
electronic communication in Britain under the guise of preventing terrorism.

(A: And so, here they are back with the same darn
thing again. And this does go on into other parts of it too. It
says:)

The London Times and The Register
then exposed details of a secret mass Internet surveillance project known as
“Mastering the Internet” (MTI). That costly system was enacted by the GCHQ with
the help of the American global aerospace, defense and technology firm Lockheed
Martin,

(A: Lockheed Martin, you see, is one of your
new feudal overlords. Big military-industrial contractor, but also does
all your censuses, by the way, for your governments, the census. They do
that too. And they also put stuff over to India, to get done there.
Even, I think they even deal now with your tax returns as well. They put
them over to India. That’s Lockheed Martin. They’re very
diversified, from guys who came into the big time by bombing people across the
planet, which they still do.)

and the British IT company Detica.
Lockheed Martin was reported to have made £200M from the deal.

(A: Not bad, eh, at the top. It says:)

According to The Register, “The
system — uncovered today by The Register and The Sunday Times — is being installed
under a GCHQ project called Mastering the Internet (MTI). It will include
thousands of deep packet inspection probes inside communications providers'
networks, as well as massive computing power at the intelligence agency's
Cheltenham base, ‘the concrete doughnut’.”

They call
it. So, anyway, for those that want to continue with the net, you should
do something about it, or at least prepare to get off it, because that’s where
I think lots of us are actually intending to go, alternate means of communication,
because, people really, it’s like the phone. It’s like the phones.
I get people phoning me, and they will sometimes say things that they shouldn’t
say. And I have to remind them, and really remind them, do you
understand, there’s a third ear on every phone call. They can’t help
themselves. They keep forgetting it. You understand, if something
is technically unobtrusive, and they’ve done lots of studies to do this
unobtrusiveness. For instance, elderly folk have had these cameras placed
inside their homes to watch them, everywhere you go. They’re little
fisheye cameras. You don’t see where they are. And so, because you
can’t see them, it’s unobtrusive, and you forget they’re there. It’s the
same thing with monitoring you, or on the phone. You don’t hear the third
person, generally, except in the early days, you used to hear them coughing,
when they were listening to your phone calls, but nowadays it’s very
quiet. It’s silent, but they’re still monitoring and keeping all those
phone calls. So, use your heads. Use your heads. You’ve got
to start using your heads. And most folk have not. They’ve
forgotten it, because it’s unobtrusive.

Now, another big part of the plan, of course, they talked
about years ago, back in the 30s, in fact, 40s and 50s. Even Julian
Huxley talked about it. He was all for it. Aldous Huxley, the
brother was all for it too, and he even put it in Brave New World. And
Bertrand Russell was all for it. Many of the big players, right to the
present time were all for bringing Pharma into drugging children. For the
peace, you see. Peace of the World. And also they wanted to drug
those with the potential abilities to have leadership qualities. And this
article says:

Would We Have Drugged Up Einstein?
How Anti-Authoritarianism Is Deemed a Mental Health Problem

We are increasingly marketing
drugs that essentially "cure" anti-authoritarians.

In my career as a psychologist, I
have talked with hundreds of people previously diagnosed by other professionals
with oppositional defiant disorder,

(A: This is this new BS they’ve put out there.)

attention deficit hyperactive
disorder, anxiety disorder and other psychiatric illnesses, and I am struck by
1) how many of those diagnosed are essentially anti-authoritarians; and 2) how
those professionals who have diagnosed them are not.

Anti-authoritarians question
whether an authority is a legitimate one before taking that authority
seriously. Evaluating the legitimacy of authorities includes assessing whether
or not authorities actually know what they are talking about, are honest, and
care about those people who are respecting their authority. And when
anti-authoritarians assess an authority to be illegitimate, they challenge and
resist that authority—sometimes aggressively and sometimes
passive-aggressively, sometimes wisely and sometimes not.

Some activists lament how few
anti-authoritarians there appear to be in the United States. One reason could
be that many natural anti-authoritarians are now psychopathologized and
medicated before they achieve political consciousness of society’s most
oppressive authorities.

or medical school and achieving a
PhD or MD and becoming a psychologist or psychiatrist means jumping through
many hoops, all of which require much behavioral and attentional compliance
with authorities, even those authorities one lacks respect for.

The selection and socialization of
mental health professionals tends to breed out many anti-authoritarians.

(A: All you get are those that are on board,
generally with a lot of problems themselves. They’re, you know, straight
back and all the rest of it. They’re just control freaks. In other
words, I’ve been good, so why aren’t you. That’s their attitude.
And good to them means obey, and obeying those above them.
Obedience. Obedience is very important.)

Degrees and credentials are
primarily badges of compliance.

(A: That’s why you get them. You understand,
when you come out of school with a degree or certificate from school leaving,
that’s really your official stamp that you’re now dumbed down enough to work in
their system, and you’re compliant. That’s what it is. So:)

Degrees and credentials are
primarily badges of compliance. Those with extended schooling have lived for
many years in a world where one routinely conforms to the demands of
authorities. Thus for many MDs and PhDs, people different from them who reject
this attentional and behavioral compliance appear to be from another world—a
diagnosable one.

I have found that most
psychologists, psychiatrists and other mental health professionals are not only
extraordinarily compliant with authorities but also unaware of the magnitude of
their obedience.

(A: You can put this into police too. You
know, go and shoot those people. Okay. It’s the same thing.
Same in the military. Same techniques are used. And to get up the
ranks and to stay in it, and to get more little stickers, and you know, more
little papers to put on your wall, the more obedient you become. You
become basically institutionalized into the system. And he says:)

And it also has become clear to me
that the anti-authoritarianism of their patients creates enormous anxiety for
these professionals, and their anxiety fuels diagnoses and treatments.

In graduate school, I discovered
that all it took to be labeled as having “issues with authority” was not
kissing up to a director of clinical training whose personality was a
combination of Donald Trump, Newt Gingrich and Howard Cosell. When I was told
by some faculty that I had “issues with authority,” I had mixed feelings about
being so labeled. On the one hand, I found it amusing, because among the
working-class children I had grown up with, I was considered relatively
compliant with authorities. After all, I had done my homework, studied and
received good grades. However, while my new “issues with authority” label made
me grin because I was now being seen as a “bad boy,” I was also concerned about
just what kind of profession I had entered. Specifically, if somebody such as
myself was labeled as having “issues with authority,” what were they calling
the children I grew up with who paid attention to many things that they cared
about but didn’t care enough about school to comply there? Well, the answer
soon became clear.

Mental Illness Diagnoses for
Anti-Authoritarians

A 2009 Psychiatric Times article
titled “ADHD & ODD: Confronting the Challenges of Disruptive Behavior”
reports that “disruptive disorders,” which include attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and opposition defiant disorder (ODD), are the
most common mental health problem of children and teenagers. ADHD is defined by
poor attention and distractibility, poor self-control and impulsivity, and
hyperactivity. ODD

(A: Is not part of the Odd Fellows by the way,
although maybe later in life they join them.)

ODD is defined as a “a pattern of
negativistic, hostile, and defiant behavior without the more serious violations
of the basic rights of others that are seen in conduct disorder”; and ODD
symptoms include “often actively defies or refuses to comply with adult
requests or rules” and “often argues with adults.”

So, I’ll
put this link up tonight too. There’s three pages all together. And
it’s quite a good article, because, you see, you don’t realize, as you go
through life, you’ve been trained into compliance. In the military you
get it. You get more little bits of metal to wear there, and more little
colored ribbons. And that tells you you’ve been a good, good boy, you
know. You take orders and you fulfill them, and you don’t talk
back. Same in the police, because they’re authoritarian organizations
that are used on the public. You’ll find it through institutions of all
kinds, and definitely through academia, where they give you a nice little
honorary this or honorary that, to stick on your wall, as I say, as long as
you’ve played the game and you haven’t been too oppositional to anything that
they discuss or talk about. That’s how you’re graded.

School, you see, goes through its own quality control
system, just like a conveyor belt, bricks in a wall. You’re bricks in a
wall. That’s what you are. And they just stamp it on you.
That’s what a leaving certificate is. You’re approved. You’re
approved by the quality control inspectors. You’re now dumb enough and
compliant enough, and you’re obedient enough to work in their system for
peanuts. That’s it.

And, in the
States, as they’re cutting back everywhere of course now too, there’s another
27,000 job cuts going in the postal service plans. And it says, at the
Ewell Post Office on Aug. 22, 2011 on Smith Island, Maryland. blah, blah, blah.

The U.S. Postal Service, which
predicts an annual loss of $18.2 billion by 2015, plans to eliminate 5.4
percent of its workforce by closing almost half its mail-processing facilities
to decrease costs.

The service plans to shut 223 of
its 461 mail-processing plants by February 2013, Postmaster General Patrick
Donahoe said in a telephone interview today. The closings will cut about 35,000
jobs, said David Partenheimer, a spokesman.

The service is shutting post
offices and seeking congressional approval to end Saturday mail delivery as
more people use the Internet to correspond and pay bills. Mail volume fell 6
percent in the quarter ended Dec. 31 and may drop 14 percent by 2016, led by
declines in first-class mail, the most profitable, the Washington-based service
said this month.

(A: What they want to do too, is privatize
everything. And sure enough, it’s on the same article, FedEx and
UPS. Because, it says:)

The changes probably won’t affect
United Parcel Service Inc. and FedEx Corp. (FDX) much because of differences in
delivery schedules and prices,

(A: They’re going to privatize everything, you
understand. Everything. And you understand that FedEx and
especially, for sure, UPS for instance, they’re given some sort of strange
legality by the government to open everything that they carry, and stamp it for
customs. They themselves are allowed that. So, it’s like partly
government. It’s this strange private/public combination, when they have
the authority to do that. Anyway, they claim:)

The closings will save the service
about $2.5 billion a year....

And it’s
pretty sad, as I say, there’s an awful, awful lot more going to lose their jobs
in that too, as the only other alternate means of communication is taken away
from you. Mind you, there’s always what the Indians did, and you can use
smoke signals. That’s what we’ll be reduced to eventually, and all you’ll
have to do then is watch the drones flying around looking for carbon and coming
down and zapping you.

Another
article too is called:

Global warming’s desperate caper

For believers in a science that
supposedly is “settled,” global-warming advocates are awfully concerned about
the need to silence dissent. Last week, the ethics chairman for the American
Geophysical Union resigned in disgrace over his role in a black-bag job meant
to intimidate the Heartland Institute, one of the most effective voices
questioning the anti-carbon-dioxide orthodoxy.

On Monday, climate scientist Peter
H. Gleick confessed that he stole the identity of a Heartland staffer in order
to obtain confidential financial files detailing the private group’s finances.
Mr. Gleick then spread those papers around to various global-warming blogs,
intending to discredit the group’s work as if it were bought and paid for by
big oil companies.

(A: Basically. And ain’t that the truth too.)

That particular line of attack is
especially pathetic. According to Heartland’s publicly available Internal
Revenue Service filings, its budget is about $6 million. The institute works on
education, health care, telecommunication and other issues, with only about a
quarter of its funds devoted to the environment. Let’s compare that to the
other side. According to the Government Accountability Office, U.S. taxpayers
forked over $26.1 billion to bankroll climate-change programs in President
Obama’s stimulus bill alone. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. The European
Union also spent $9.5 billion on climate-change financing, and the United
Nations chips in as well.

(A: And, of course, the United Nations lives on your tax
dollars as well. So, it says:)

The voices shouting that “the sky
is falling” are rewarded with Nobel Prizes, Oscars, research grants, loans and
subsidies that essentially are without limit. Compared to this level of
support, Heartland couldn’t be more of an underdog, but its bark has the
climate billionaires on the run.

The Union of Concerned Scientists
(UCS) went so far as to imply that Heartland’s devastating critiques drove Mr.
Gleick to commit his crime. “It’s unfortunate that the bitter, personal attacks
on his colleagues and their work contributed to what he called a lapse of his
own personal judgment and ethics,”....

So, everyone is getting in on the act, pros and cons.

Now, it says here, this is from India, but it’s about China
and Britain. And it says:

Jaguars and Land Rovers

(A: These are the biggies in Britain, are now:)

to be Built in China.

India's top vehicle maker Tata
Motors

(A: I hope it doesn’t mean tatters.)

has selected a partner to build an
assembly plant for its luxury British car brands Jaguar and Land Rover in
China, a senior executive said on Tuesday.

"We are waiting for the
necessary regulatory approvals,"....

And he wouldn’t say much more about it, except that they’re
definitely going to make them there. Back with more, after this break.

Hi folks, I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix.
And talking about how wonderful it is now that Jaguar and Land Rover companies
will be made over in India and China, etc. And it said that:

Tata Motors, which also makes the
world's cheapest car, the Nano, bought Jaguar and Land Rover from US Ford Motor
Co in 2008 for $2.3 billion as part of its plans to expand beyond Asia.

(A: Wonderful too that India and China still is
getting most favored trading nation status, where they can burn all their
fossil fuels and pay them peanuts for the workers and all that kind of stuff as
well. And we help to fund that. We’re still funding these companies
that moved over there. We’re still funding them today with our tax
money. And you’re still talking about politics at home, eh?)

Ramakrishnan said Tata Motors
plans to double its investments in JLR to 1.5 billion pounds a year, starting
in the new financial year, to help launch new products and technologies.

In recent years India and China
have emerged as key markets for global automakers, as car sales in most
developed countries have slumped due to economic turmoil.

(A: It’s amazing, through all this turmoil, we can
still fund these Third World countries. We still call them Third World
Countries, as we pump billions and billions and trillions of dollars into them,
via the World Trade Organization and all the treaties that we’ve signed with
them.)

Government stimulus packages in
both Asian nations, along with cheap financing and new model launches, have
helped drive demand among increasingly well-off consumers.

So, if you can get on abroad, it’s a good idea to emigrate
to one of these countries, because at least they’ll have some stability for the
next twenty to fifty years. Who knows. And, also, I was going to
put up:

How to Prevent YouTube from
Keeping a Record of The Videos You Watch

(A: Now, I don’t really put faith in these
things because I understand, whatever they tell you at the top, is always
lying. They’ll always keep a whole bunch of your stuff, all your records
on everything, even when they say they’ll delete it. They delete
nothing. But it talks about how to, I’ll put this link up tonight to show
you how to do it, if you want to go in, because in March, apparently, they’re
going to keep all your histories, etc. They’ve already been doing it, as
I said, and probably will continue to do it, but for those who want to try it,
it’s up to you. It says:)

First, click on "Pause search
history" which will disable the video search logging

Then, in the menu on the left,
click "History" and then the button at the top, "Pause viewing
history" to disable the recording of the videos you view on YouTube

(A: Problem is, you’ve got to sign on to YouTube to
do it all. Which is another contract in itself, isn’t it? It says:)

If ever you want to go back to having a log of the
videos you've watched or searched for on YouTube back, you can click the resume
buttons.

But that’s up to you. Personally, I think there’s no
point. They’ve got all this stuff on you, and they don’t care at that
level about legalities. They never have. Their top bosses just say,
make sure you’re watching everybody, and they do. That’s how things are
done at the top. They don’t bother themselves with laws at the top.
They don’t bother themselves with any laws at all. I’ll put this link up
tonight, for those who do want to try it, if they want to try it, and maybe
give me some feedback on how you get on with it. It’s just disgusting
what we’re going through. To be expected, of course. It had to
come. And as I say, they’ve been monitoring and recording us from your
first personal computer. It’s personal. And they give you all that
guff that they gave you about, oh, your personal firewall. It’s all yours
and it’s secure and yadda, yadda, yah. And then you find out in ’95, the
government issued that all computers, all devices electronic must have back
doors built into them, by law. In Canada, the States, and
elsewhere. 1995. So that government can get in any time they
want. That’s how you rule. It’s called power. You’ve got the
power to do it.

Anyway,
from Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night. And may
your god or your gods go with you.