For the most part, these allegations strike me as overblown and unfair. But,
for argument's sake, let's say they're not. Let's even say that Paul has the
passionate support of the Legion of Doom, that his campaign lunchroom looks
like the "Star Wars" cantina, and that his top advisors have hooves instead
of feet.

Well, I would still find him less scary than Mike Huckabee.

While many are marveling at Paul's success at breaking out of the
tinfoil-hat ghetto, Huckabee's story is even more remarkable. The former
Arkansas governor and Baptist minister is polling in second place in Iowa
and could conceivably win there. He's still a long shot to take the
nomination and a pipe dream to take the presidency, but Huckabee matters in
a way that Paul still doesn't. One small indicator of Huckabee's relevance:
His presidential opponents are attacking Huckabee while ignoring Paul like
he's an eccentric sitting too close to you on the bus.

What's troubling about The Man From Hope 2.0 is what he represents. Huckabee
represents compassionate conservatism on steroids. A devout social
conservative on issues such as abortion, school prayer, homosexuality and
evolution, Huckabee's a populist on economics, a fad-follower on the
environment and an all-around do-gooder who believes that the biblical
obligation to do "good works" extends to using government - and your tax
dollars - to bring us closer to the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth.

For example, Huckabee would support a nationwide ban on public smoking. Why?
Because he's on a health kick, thinks smoking is bad and believes the
government should do the right thing.

And therein lies the chief difference between Paul and Huckabee. One is a
culturally conservative libertarian. The other is a right-wing progressive.

Whatever shortcomings Paul and his friends might have, Paul's dogma
generally renders those shortcomings irrelevant. He is a true ideologue in
that his personal preferences are secondary to his philosophical principles.
When asked what his position is, he generally responds that his position can
be deduced from the text of the Constitution. Of course, that's not as
dispositive as he thinks it is. But you get the point.

As for Huckabee - as with most politicians, alas - his personal preferences
matter enormously because, ultimately, they're the only things that can be
relied on to constrain him.

In this respect, Huckabee's philosophy is conventionally liberal, or
progressive. What he wants government to do certainly differs in important
respects from what Hillary Clinton wants, but the limits he would place on
governmental do-goodery are primarily tactical or practical, not
philosophical or constitutional. This isn't to say he - or Hillary - is a
would-be tyrant, but simply to note that the progressive notion of the state
as a loving, caring parent is becoming a bipartisan affair.

Indeed, Huckabee represents the latest attempt to make conservatism more
popular. Contrary to the conventional belief that Republicans need to drop
their opposition to abortion, gay marriage and the like in order to be
popular, Huckabee understands that the unpopular stuff is the economic
libertarianism: free trade and smaller government. That's why we're seeing a
rise in economic populism on the right married to a culturally conservative
populism. Huckabee is the bastard child of Lou Dobbs and Pat Robertson.

Historically, the conservative movement benefited from the tension between
libertarianism and cultural traditionalism. This tension - and the effort to
reconcile it under the name "fusionism" - has been mischaracterized as a
battle between right-wing factions when it's really a conflict that runs
through the heart of every conservative. We all have little Mike Huckabees
and Ron Pauls sitting on our shoulders. Neither is always right, but both
should be listened to.

I would not vote for Paul mostly because I think his foreign policy would be
disastrous (Also, he'd lose in a rout not seen since Bambi versus Godzilla).
But there's something weird going on when Paul, the small-government
constitutionalist, is considered the extremist in the Republican Party,
while Huckabee, the statist, is the lovable underdog. It's even weirder
because it's probably true: Huckabee is much
closer to the mainstream. And that's what scares me about Huckabee and the
mainstream alike.

Jonah Goldberg is editor-at-large of National Review Online,and the author of the book The Tyranny of Clichés. You can reach him via Twitter @JonahNRO.
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Jonah Goldberg's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

Misc.

Mobile

About Townhall.com

Townhall.com is the leading source for conservative news and political commentary and analysis.

Townhall is packed with breaking news headlines, political news, and conservative opinion with Townhall columnists including Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Michael Barone, Star Parker, Dennis Prager, Thomas Sowell, and many more of your favorite conservatives.
Political cartoons full of satire and political humor from editorial cartoonists including Michael Ramirez, Glenn McCoy, and Henry Payne.

Townhall.com also features the latest news videos and pictures on the latest political hot topics including health care reform, the economy, immigration, government tax, President Obama, Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney, Herman Cain, Ron Paul, Iraq, immigration, politics, gay marriage laws, and many more big news issues.