If you are going to say a game was rigged, please have some anecdotal data available. He was not betting on who wins, no one does. Its spreads, or more likely its being reported as over/unders. So if you are saying the game was rigged because THE HEAT WON or something like that, it makes no sense under the conditions listed as what he was most likely betting on.

Plus posts like THIS PROVES THE MAVS FINALS WAS RIGGED, it doesn't. He didnt work any of those games, and even if he did, it doesn't fit the parameters listed.

I know he fixed games, but none of you know which, stop pretending you do.

Yes, idiots. The crooked refs didn't determine the outcome of the game, they only bet on point totals. Lets say they bet on both teams scoring 110+ each. If the score is 90-90 with 9 minutes left in the 4th, the crooked refs will call some ticky-tack fouls, put both teams in the bonus, and have a high scoring free-throw parade. Eventually both teams will get over the total amount that the ref bet on, and he'll call the game regularly. This may have determined the outcome of 1 out of 100 games, it didn't change series', or determine the NBA champion, lets be real.

Yes, idiots. The crooked refs didn't determine the outcome of the game, they only bet on point totals. Lets say they bet on both teams scoring 110+ each. If the score is 90-90 with 9 minutes left in the 4th, the crooked refs will call some ticky-tack fouls, put both teams in the bonus, and have a high scoring free-throw parade. Eventually both teams will get over the total amount that the ref bet on, and he'll call the game regularly. This may have determined the outcome of 1 out of 100 games, it didn't change series', or determine the NBA champion, lets be real.

Yes it did.

If his Cronies put money on the Maverics to win by 2, and the other team was up 5 with a few minutes to go, who do you think is getting all the free-throws?

1 out of 100 games? yeah right.

Im sure some of the bets were on point totals, "Both teams go over 110 points," but others were on point differential. In those cases he decided the winner before the game even started. And im sure it happened more than 1 out of 100 times.

If his Cronies put money on the Maverics to win by 2, and the other team was up 5 with a few minutes to go, who do you think is getting all the free-throws?

1 out of 100 games? yeah right.

Im sure some of the bets were on point totals, "Both teams go over 110 points," but others were on point differential. In those cases he decided the winner before the game even started. And im sure it happened more than 1 out of 100 times.

my point is actually we DONT know what games were affected, and you cant judge it just by looking at a score, or for bad calls. you need to see how the line moved, what he bet on etc. to be honest, you need to be told which games are affected.

all the "look at these 5 bad calls, this is a cheating game" posts are just speculation. and usually based on poor logic.

my point is actually we DONT know what games were affected, and you cant judge it just by looking at a score, or for bad calls. you need to see how the line moved, what he bet on etc. to be honest, you need to be told which games are affected.

all the "look at these 5 bad calls, this is a cheating game" posts are just speculation. and usually based on poor logic.