Pay Attention: Final Rules on Loan Originator Compensation

Friday, April 19, 2013

January, 2013, was a watershed month for mortgage standards after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau released the long-awaited final rules on ability to repay, qualified mortgages, mortgage servicing, and appraisal requirements. Each of these rules promises to keep compliance gurus busy throughout this year and into 2014. January also heralded another Dodd-Frank final rule of great interest to senior management, boards of directors, and certainly to the frontline, revenue producing, mortgage loan personnel – the mortgage loan originator compensation requirements.

The new compensation rules are potential bottom line changers both for mortgage loan officers/originators and financial institutions themselves—making it imperative that financial institution management and boards of directors move this topic to the top of their to-do lists.

In the aftermath of the mortgage market meltdown, politicians and pundits, and the federal regulators who answer to them, became increasingly focused on the role that loan officers and originators play in the consumer mortgage loan process. Prior to the meltdown, training and qualification standards for loan originators varied widely within the industry. Furthermore, compensation programs evolved to incentivize loan officers and originators to lead consumers into more expensive loans. With Title XIV of the Dodd-Frank Act and the compensation final rules, the consumer protectors set out to end these practices.

What’s Not OK

The rules on compensation prohibit a loan officer/originator from being compensated based on any “term of the transaction” or any proxy for a term of the transaction. This is not new; this prohibition has been part of Regulation Z since 2011. The final rule now defines “term of the transaction” but leaves some uncertainty. A term of the transaction is “any right or obligation of the parties to the credit transaction.” What does this mean? The commentary to the final rule answers that question by including descriptions of items the CFPB believes are “terms of the transaction.” Those items include (see final rule commentary for full list):

interest rate

prepayment penalty

whether a product or service is purchased (e.g., lender’s title policy)

What’s OK

CFPB acknowledges the compensation restrictions could create uncertainty for regulated institutions. To allay this uncertainty, the final rule commentary provides a list of examples of permissible compensation mechanisms, which includes (see final rule commentary for full list):

originator’s overall loan volume

loan performance over time

whether the customer is existing or new

quality/condition of loan files

percentage of applications resulting in closed loans

Under the final rules, financial institutions are permitted to continue paying mortgage loan officers/originators bonus compensation. However, bonuses will be subject to some restrictions. Bonuses may not be based on the terms of the individual loan officer/originator’s transactions, and bonus compensation cannot exceed 10 percent of the individual loan officer/originator’s total compensation for the relevant period.

Looking Forward: Best Practices

The new compensation rules and the other residential mortgage related rules go into effect in January, 2014. Examination teams, armed with new exam procedures, will be descending on banks to test for compliance. Below are a few best practice steps bank managers and boards of directors may take to be prepared.

Ensure consumer compliance teams are trained on the new rules. Modify consumer compliance audit/review procedures to ensure new rules are appropriately tested.

Ensure mortgage lending management teams and loan officers/originators are trained on the new rules.

Assign appropriate personnel to monitor release of guidance from CFPB and other federal regulatory agencies; review new examination procedures when available.

Have management report to board of directors, or appropriate committee, on progress toward compliance.

There is Still More

The compensation final rules address several other important topics, including dual compensation, payment of upfront points/fees, loan originator qualifications, and mandatory arbitration provisions. These topics are important for all participants in the mortgage lending arena, and you are encouraged to review them.

Mike Dailey combines his extensive legal experience with strategic business sense in order to help his clients navigate the many complex legal and business issues that challenge their organizations. Mike counsels clients within the public, private, and non-profit sectors in a variety of industries including banking, healthcare, manufacturing, consumer products, and various service industries. His corporate practice focuses primarily in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance, capital raising (debt and equity), and bank regulatory compliance. He advises...

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558 Telephone (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.