A Regular Commentary on Strategic Affairs from a Leading Commentator and Analyst
2018 book project: Little Europe? Twenty-First Century Strategy for Declining Powers

hms iron duke

Wednesday, 7 October 2015

NATO: The West must play Chess AND Poker

Forli, Italy. 7 October. A grigio
mist hangs over the ancient Italian hills; an infant autumn awakening. Below me
ageing leaves born of a long, hot Italian summer nestle in russet mantle clad.
Gentle change in ancient permanence? I am back in my beloved Italy; tired,
stressed, noble Italy, in a beautiful medieval castle high
above Forli and not far from where the River Rubicon of legend flows. Roman
armies of antiquity were forbade to cross the Rubicon and enter what was then
Italy unless they had express permission from the Roman magistrates for only
they could exercise Imperium. That sense of a strategic Rubicon being crossed
suffused an excellent conference organised by Rome’s Istituto Affari Internazionale, the University of Bologna, and NATO’s Allied Command Transformation. The conference discussed the threats
with which NATO must contend, and the myriad complex mix of ends, ways and means
the West’s adversaries present. Rapid change in strategic flux.

The other day President Obama complained
about President Putin and his penchant for Machtpolitik.
“This is not a superpower chess game”, Obama said. With respect, Mr President,
yes it is. Or, rather this is the beginning of a new Great Game of power as the
illiberal and the downright evil challenge the liberal order the West has come
to take for granted. As I said in my typically modest and understated speech,
NATO’s future world will be one in which “chaos, confusion and Clausewitz will
meet in an unholy trinity of uncertainty”. Or, to put it rather less pompously; wake
up and smell the strategic coffee!

Where Americans fear to tread, Europeans
refuse to think. By implying that Russia is still a superpower and thus
America’s strategic equal President Obama affords woeful Russia an equality in
European and world affairs that can only be an equality of fear. The Stolichnaya must be flowing in the grand
halls of the Kremlin with this anointing of Putin's great power super-bluff. Sadly,
the contradiction that is Russia means the inevitable end of the bluff is inevitable, and that at some point in the not-too-distant future the inevitable end of the
bluff will inevtiably be more dangerous than the bluff itself.

The focus of the
conference was the 2016 NATO Warsaw Summit. Given where the summit
is to be held the core topic should be clear; the re-invigoration of NATO as a conventional
and nuclear deterrent. Central to that mission will be the readiness of
Alliance forces. ‘Readiness’ means to be prepared to do something, anything,
whatever and wherever. In the NATO context that means Allied forces able
to cope with the future shock that is surely to emerge from the swamp of
deceit, disinformation, and de-stabilisation that is hybrid warfare, today’s
way of war. And therein lies the
challenge because keeping military forces at ‘readiness’ is expensive and as
the strategic context expands and the strategic picture gets bigger, and the
military task-list of nationally-funded Alliance forces grows exponentially, the size of the force is being cut.

So, give the Alliance more and
better forces? Well no. Defence IQ’s
new report “Global Defence Spending 2015”
states, “Western and central Europe is the only region in the world that saw its
military expenditure fall during the 2014-2015 period”. Nor is the problem
confined to Europe. Only last week US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter warned
that the threat of sequestration continues to stymy effective long-term US defence
planning and that US forces are suffering from a “hand-to-mouth existence”.

Which brings me to chess and poker, the strategic metaphors du jour. President Putin likes to imply he is engaged in strategic chess. After all, Russia has had many grand masters. In fact Putin is playing military poker and he is doing so with a weak hand. His aim? NATO, or rather the collapse of the strategic unity of effort and purpose without which NATO as a deterrent is no longer credible.

Whether it be chess or poker strength
is the key to victory and weakness the guarantee of failure. Whilst chess
stresses foresight, guile and manoeuvre, poker is built on the premise that a
strong mind with a weak hand can trump a strong hand held by a weak mind. It is
precisely that game President Putin is playing as he seeks to exploit the seam between
the West’s actual strength and its strategic feeble-mindedness.

Therefore, Europeans and North
Americans must be under no illusion about the Great Game in which it is being
engaged. The future of liberal international values is at stake if the Game is
lost. Moreover, the West could well defeat itself through its own
contradictions, specifically the tension between values and interests from
which many Western states suffer. ‘Values’ for too many in the West means the
replacement of interests, i.e. the success of values is defined by the
abandonment of interests.

NATO is an instrument of power. If
NATO is to defend the West and its ‘values’ it must be firmly established on an
equally firm understanding of shared interests, and the credible, relevant
military power required to generate influence and effect.

So, Mr President, the real danger
to the West, and by extension NATO, comes not from the ‘strength’ of a weak
President Putin and his ilk. It comes from the growing tendency in Western
capitals to define security purely in terms of values rather than interests, and
the uncertainty such strategic wooliness creates in our minds, and the encouragement
it affords our adversaries (or ‘counterparts’ as the Kremlin now styles itself).

The world today is one in which
chaos, confusion and Clausewitz sit cheek by jowl. In the midst of such
uncertainty the West must be able to play chess and poker at one and the same
time. That means a clear understanding of one’s opponents, the strategic
foresight upon which stratagems can be built and the diplomatic machine to
enact them, the strength of mind to raise the stakes when our interests are
threatened, and the military capacity to render Western strategy and indeed
NATO credible. Thereafter, the West’s
very ability to defend its vital interests will itself be the best way to
promote its values.

The mission of NATO’s Warsaw
Summit? Deliver on the promises made at NATO’s 2014 Wales Summit. If that means crossing a strategic Rubicon so be it…and get on
with it!

About Me

Julian Lindley-French is Senior Fellow of the Institute of Statecraft, Director of Europa Analytica & Distinguished Visiting Research Fellow, National Defense University, Washington DC. An internationally-recognised strategic analyst, advisor and author he was formerly Eisenhower Professor of Defence Strategy at the Netherlands Defence Academy,and Special Professor of Strategic Studies at the University of Leiden. He is a Fellow of Respublica in London, and a member of the Strategic Advisory Group of the Atlantic Council of the United States in Washington.
Latest books: The Oxford Handbook on War 2014 (Paperback) (2014; 709 pages). (Oxford: Oxford University Press) & "Little Britain? Twenty-First Strategy for a Middling European Power". (www.amazon.com)
The Friendly-Clinch Health Warning: The views contained herein are entirely my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any institution.