That sounds way better... not only the competition increase... it will also make sure the alliances don't have it easy making sure that there are more boosts subsequently more earning for tacticsoft...

To be clear: its not about making some players happy and overrule others who voted for another option.The point is that the whole poll is flawed and sided into one direction without any possibility to vote for a smaller alliance size.

Its me to blame as I should have said 8 - 10 - 12 or even 5 - 10 -15Starting with the standard number of 10 and give 3 possibilities to increase the alliance size was a bad mistake and I'd like to apologize for this

You are around since quite some time... and so, you should know that the options in this voting are not reflecting a personal opinion of me or other single persons here.As community manager, I'll go with the options that the community requested to have.Even more, I would never state my point of view to this topic nor vote at this topic. If I would do, the result may change.

Battledawn has always been close to the players needs and we like to ask about their opinions. If you don't like the 16 player option, you are free to say why you think its not good.

Alexanderkitty wrote:

Is Tacticsoft truly so disconnected that they believe the game is now in a state where it can successfully support a competive 16 man world ?

This is subjective and not even a reason.We will go with the alliance size that our community will decide. If this is too liberal for you, sorry [/quote]

Sorry to interrupt you Ilona but we need development on those thing that will make the game better not worse. Its hard to find 10 people good enough for an alliance thesedays so how on earth will people find 16? And you really need to cut on number of servers in order to make the game better. We are stuck only in the hope that bd will be better like old days soon enough but I guess its only a hopeless dream. The idea of CE is very good and we all should make it better . And I think admins should also contribute to it by playing there. And my vote is 12Neither the less nor more than a dozen

Okay, this is getting annoying.. All i can see is *CENSORED*.. If there are 16 man alliances who f***ing cares? Really its only a game , tbh i voted for 16 man cuz last time i seen was E1A1 24 man and none cared that it was that high so why are all of you b*tching now? Lets go back to OC days just 12 and not 10 We all know 12 was better but nooo its 10 now.. and you are all okay with it so why not have it 16 man should be harder and more fun.. over all if you can get 15 people in ur team by the due date i guess met more people tbh.

Ilona what will be the prizes for the 16 members in the winning team? How many relis will drop?

Will top 2 and top 3 team get anything?

This alone displays the total waste of any alliance attending this event. Unless you have access to 40 of the best and richest BD players you will not win. Unless you have 2 subs willing to boost and play hard without reward you will not win.. as much as i respect rania and the people she plays with... the bd champs again will be a one sided mega alliance wins comp. I'm sorry but I would rather my fam win every other world in bd then waste money on this comp.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum