Monthly Archives: January 2015

Post navigation

The Islamic State and the Jihad is all too real for millions of the poorest people int he world who are now living as refugees and it is no scam for the Young girls being raped daily by these ISIS scumbags.

So what is scam about this Icke. Is it not you Icke who is the scum in this case?

And why should it be a surprise that capitalism and NATO through Turkey (Obama’s best friend) are supplying the Islamic State Islam fanatics? They did exactly the same under Clinton to Izetbegovic in Bosnia.

And your spawn last night on Talk Radio Europe roared that he could not give an “arse” about the Japanese threatened with beheading by the scum of Islamic State. That is your best chum the man who murders English each night in his phoney Irish Waterford slur.

The real tragedy is that Talk Radio Europe is owned by a Jewish English man called Martin Nathan and he is giving you Icke a platform which you really do not deserve

Turkey’s prime minister, a NATO ally, is shipping arms to al-Qaeda and ISIS via Syria-bound trucks operated by the country’s intelligence agency, according to Turkish military officials.

Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu banned media from reporting on three of the trucks searched by the military’s Gendarmerie General Command, which discovered 45 to 55 missiles or rockets, 30 to 40 crates of ammunition, including mortar rounds, and Douchka anti-aircraft ammunition.

“The trucks were carrying weapons and supplies to the al-Qaeda terror organization,” a report by the Gendarmerie General Command stated.

Davutoglu also removed public prosecutor Aziz Takei from office for ordering the search. Additionally, the 13 soldiers involved in the search have been charged with espionage and are facing 20-year prison terms.

Qur’an 9:29, “Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.”

Ibn Kathir’s 14th century commentary [83] expresses the classical Muslim orthodoxy on Qur’an 9:29 — the verse which links the unique Islamic institution of jihad war, integrally, to the imposition of the pact of submission (or “dhimma”) upon the vanquished “Scriptured” (or “dhimmi”) peoples, primarily Jews and Christians:

…when the People of the Scriptures disbelieved in Muhammad, they had no beneficial faith in any Messenger or what the Messengers brought. Rather they followed their religions because this conformed with their ideas, lusts, and the ways of their forefathers, not because they are Allah’s laws and religion. Had they been true believers in their religions, that faith would have directed them to believe in Muhammad because all Prophets gave the good news of Muhammad’s advent and commanded them to obey and follow him. Yet when he was sent, they disbelieved in him, even though he is the mightiest of all Messengers. Therefore, they do not follow the religion of earlier Prophets because these religions came from Allah, but because these suit their desires and lusts. Therefore, their claimed faith in an earlier Prophet will not benefit them because they disbelieved in the master, the mightiest, the last and most perfect of all Prophets. Hence Allah’s statement “Fight against those who believe not in Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth among the People of the Scripture”

This honorable Ayah was revealed with the order to fight the People of the Book, after the pagans were defeated, the people entered Allah’s region in large numbers, and the Arabian Peninsula was secured under the Muslims’ control.

If I was a Jew and the Holocaust was right there on my landscape (understatement cannot put this into words actually) then I would want to know why. Francisco Gil White (When Hitler came to power in 1933 outrages against the German Jews began immediately… http://www.hirhome.com/israel/leaders0.htm) sidesteps the issue and goes on to talk about a Jewish Boycott but does not tell us that that was AFTER the event. By “event” I mean what precisely? I mean the seizure of power by the Nazis in 1933. It is mostly hidden but it was possible to have Hitler stopped in 1933. His election vote was actually going down (fairly well known). There were battalions able and willing to stop this fiend and these fiends from taking the state power in that Germany in those 1930s. There was a massive trade union and labour movement in Germany huge battalions of workers organised inside the unions. Looking at it with a cool eye it seems to me certain that the masses of German organised workers knew or at the very least sensed the great danger from the Nazis – not necessarily danger to the Jews but just simply danger. But the leaders betrayed. How they betrayed is for another story but they did. And Hitler strolled into state power. The first thing Hitler did was to pulverise all independent (not just labour) but all independent voices. The concentration camps waited even for those leaders who had helped him take state power.

There is something similar in Islam. The Mohammedan tax on the Kafir is (though not the modern phenomenon of Fascism) the same thing in essence. The payer of the tax did not only have to pay the tax he had to pay it with his belly on the ground and ready to feel the whip of his Master. The paying of this tax was also a statement that I (with my belly on the ground and my face in the dirt) can never get my hands on the state power. Muslims rule through the state, If not precisely the same thing that Hitler did in 1933 it is uncannily close. The state is the key issue in all of these issues. Hitler knew or again at least sensed all of this which is why Hitler more and more began to have a love for Islam and unease with Christianity. Islam did nor waffle. The Popes and Archbishops of Canterbury – they waffle (exception being the more intellectual Benedict see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regensburg_lecture)Islam like the Nazis go straight for the jugular. Today much of what Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller report on is the effort (successful) to keep the Kafir from actually ruling (using state power) against the Jihad.

The Jews are now feeling that they cannot live with safety in Europe. A man who was investigating the murder of 85 Jews (in a synagogue!) by Iran/Hizbullah is murdered in Argentina. In Saudi Arabia a young man is whipped every Friday for what – basically for practising journalism. People go on supporting this thing called Palestinians when last night I saw these same Palestinains (post Paris) carrying the Black Flag of Islamic State. Hollande most important man in France was not going to invite Netanyahu to Paris following the murders. Abbas who was definitely the organiser of the Munich Olympics massacre of Jewish athletes was in the front line almost at the very centre. Britain France and Germany all voted for the Palestine state in the UN. Sweden is the worst of all enemies of Israel and soon will be an Islamic State. If France is bad now what will it be like in 20 years!? Many many animals in the world are threatened with extinction. In Ireland the Irish Hare could become extinct. Many people do not ask why? They do not go behind the surface impressions of living. Some people offer a religious answer and all I will say that that did not save the Jews from the Nazi ovens in 1939.

As Pope Francis and all Christian Heirarchies silent the por Christians of these African countries such as Nigeria and Níger are being wiped out.

THE LATEST THIS MORNING (SUNDAY) ON THE CRITICAL SITUATION FACING THE 5 PER CENT CHRISTIANS IN NIGER)

FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…

On BBC news this Sunday morning it is TEN Churches burned

Niger is very important and is very instructional. There is 95 per cent Muslim population, 5 per cent other mainly Christian.

This is how I read it correct me if wrong. The 95 per cent Muslim are rooted in the Koran. This may be a passive rootedness not unlike the prejudices that surrounded Christians, with reference to Judas being the traitor and the Jews who killed the “saviour”, a prejudice that can lie underneath for a long time, but at times become critical.

There is along with that 95 per cent the profesional inflamers of these underlying prejudices. That is happening in scores of different countries as we speak. Niger has a very long border with the critical Nigeria, the largest African country population wise, a country much divided on itself which never really got over the Biafran Civil War tending to drive towards pacifism in its aftermath. As an aside this happens a lot and Ireland is an example where the dead alley of the Irish Civil War post-1921 “Independence” encouraged revisionist thinking about the concept of independence itself. This weakening of nation is fertile ground for Islam Jihad. So in Nigeria there is a large army but the army is almost pacifist in spirit, thinking and tactics. This may be a part explanation but at least helps to understand how Nigerian army conscripts lay down their arms and flee in the face of the Islamic State savages, whereas the Kurd fighters including their women stand and fight the savage enemy of the Jihad.

In all of these countries like Niger there is a very unstable political situation to start with. Then along with that there is the promotion of Jihad and of Islam by Obama, by the Democrats, by parts of the republican side like McCain, and there is promotion of Jihad on a broad canvas by ALL European Governments, the centre of which focus is the lethal poison of Antisemitic “Palestinianism” (and here I have to honour the memory of Joan Peters who died recently)

The comments on Jihadwatch above are spot on. I am a Trotskyist socialist revolutionary and I agree with them 100 per cent.

Four people were killed and 45 injured in a day of violent protests in Niger’s second city against French magazine Charlie Hebdo’s publication of a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed.

Massaoudou Hassoumi, the interior minister, said a policeman and three civilians died in Friday’s disturbances in Zinder in which three churches were ransacked and the French cultural centre was burned down.

Thousands of protesters gathered outside mosques after Friday prayers to vent anger at the depiction of the prophet, which is considered taboo to most Muslims.

Twenty-two members of the security forces and 23 protesters were hurt in the ensuing clashes, national radio reported, as one Catholic and two Protestant churches were attacked.

A doctor in the city’s hospital told AFP that all of the dead and three of the injured had gunshot wounds….

I believe this would be a perfect time for Robert Spencer to have pointed out that Charlie Hebdo was/is put together by a bunch of atheist who hate Christianity more so than Islam, but da Mob burned down 2 Protestant and a Catholic Church even after the Pope groveled in front of them. . There is NO appeasement for Islam’s blood lust that will be accepted in anything but the shortest of time periods!

Obama brought the full weight of the west to overthrow the secular leaders like Ben Ali, Gaghbo, and here Mubarak and Gadhafi in favor of the Jihadists their mortal enemies. It will not be easy for el Sisi

FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…At the end Martin Sherman writes

“So while Sisi’s endeavor should be warmly applauded – and supported – its chances of success are sufficiently uncertain – indeed, remote – that it would be more than imprudent of the West and for Israel to make any assumption of such success a basis for future policy.”

That is a wise warning.

Ben Shapiro took on Ben Affleck and the myth that only a tiny minority of Muslims worldwide are radical. Shapiro based his thoughts on this so vital matter on the Pew Poll Research. There are huge numbers in ALL of these countries like Egypt who are in favor of Sharia Law, or aspects of Sharia Law, such as hand cutting for theft. This is the culture of 1500 years of indoctrination by Islam.

It therefore cannot be easy and it is well to know this. But there is one other factor which is absolutely central. There is the role of the world capitalist governments of all types, especially the US Governments and the European states. Their role is to defend and prop up, even promote, Islam.

And note it well there is only ONE Islam. It is based on the Koran. Note the extreme confusión that even the valiant el Sisi throws up on thiis very score.

But back to those governments. The Arab secular governments have met not just the wrath of the Islam but also the wrath of those very governments. Obama insisted on overthrowing Mubarak and he invited the Muslim Brothers in Egypt to attend his first public occasion in Cairo. Remember that. Then on to Ivory Coast, Tunisia, above all to the war on Gadhafi. Britain and France were to the very fore in this.

So that is the enemy. It is a huge enemy indeed. The Fascist left like the David Icke spawn are playing perhaps a key roll where even the murder of cartoonists in Paris and Jews in a Kosher establishment are being changed, morphing into sheer Antisemitism – the Palestinian Arab ANTISEMITIC narrative enters everything.

Martin is right. This is a huge task. Please let us discuss the implications with an open mind.

Into the Fray: Sisi or ISIS?

It’s difficult to overstate the potential importance of the Egyptian president’s New Year speech on Islam – and equally important to avoid overly optimistic expectations as to its practical impact.

It is possible that $1.6 Billion people [Muslims] should want to kill the rest of the world’s inhabitants – that is 7 billion – so that they themselves may live? Impossible!” – Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, Al-Azhar, January 1

“O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty.” – Koran, Sura 9:123

“Violence… occurs between Muslims, on the one hand, and Orthodox Serbs in the Balkans, Jews in Israel, Hindus in India, Buddhists in Burma and Catholics in the Philippines. Islam has bloody borders.” – Samuel Huntington, “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs, 1993

He directed measured, but nonetheless severe, censure at much of the Islamic clergy, their interpretation of religious texts and their prescription for how Muslims should practice their faith in the modern day: “I am referring here to the religious clerics. We have to think hard about what we are facing – and I have, in fact, addressed this topic a couple of times before. It’s inconceivable that the thinking that we hold most sacred should cause the entire umma [Islamic world] to be a source of anxiety, danger, killing and destruction for the rest of the world. Impossible!”

Ironically, Sisi spoke at the same venue that Barack Obama chose to deliver his 2009 “Outreach Speech” to the Muslim world. But the contrast between the two could hardly be more striking. As one US analyst deftly noted: “Obama began the 2009 speech by praising the same seminary that Sisi reprimanded,” emphasizing “That [Obama’s approach] is different from Sisi, who is trying to suppress the Brotherhood movement and push Al-Azhar’s Islamic leaders toward modernity.”

Sisi used the occasion to condemn the ongoing practices in the Islamic world, after having coercively removed the regressive and ruinous regime of the Muslim Brotherhood from power. By contrast, Obama heaped effusive praise on Islam, and insisted on places of honor for senior Brotherhood representatives – to the chagrin of his host, president Hosni Mubarak. Indeed, many consider Obama’s words and gestures in Cairo as providing a considerable – arguably, crucial – fillip in the process that swept the Brotherhood to power barely two years later.

Revolution not reform

Although Sisi was at pains to appear respectful to Islam as a religion per se, there was little doubt as to the grim view he took of the consequences of the manner in which Muslims were being instructed to observe their faith.

“That thinking – I am not saying ‘religion’ but ‘thinking’ – that corpus of texts and ideas that we have sacralized over the years, to the point that departing from them has become almost impossible, is antagonizing the entire world!” he said.

Sisi appealed to the religious establishment for a “more enlightened perspective”: “I am saying these words here at Al-Azhar, before this assembly of scholars and ulema [top Islamic scholars] – Allah Almighty be witness to your truth on Judgment Day concerning that which I’m talking about now…you cannot feel it if you remain trapped within this mindset. You need to step outside of yourselves to be able to… reflect on it from a more enlightened perspective.”

But despite his ostensible deference, Sisi made no bones about what was called for. Not gradual reform but swift revolution. “I say and repeat again that we are in need of a religious revolution. You, imams, are responsible before Allah. The entire world, I say it again, the entire world is waiting for your next move,” he urged.

Tendency to appease

Sisi is undoubtedly correct in his diagnosis of Islam as comprising “a source of anxiety, danger, killing and destruction for the rest of the world.” However, until recently the tendency of the “rest of the world” has been to appease rather than oppose, to understand rather than withstand, to excuse rather than expunge.

Nonetheless, lately there does appear to be the beginning of rumbling discontent in the West, and indications that resistance to Islamic-inspired outrages is beginning to emerge – albeit far too timidly and far too slowly.

It is still too early to assess whether the savage slaughter in Paris last week will prove a tipping-point in the mood toward Islam and shift it from angst to anger. There is, however, considerable room for skepticism.

For despite the short-term uproar the killings at Charlie Hebdo and Hyper Cacher has generated, the death toll pales when compared to far-greater Muslim-motivated atrocities perpetrated in the West without producing a sustained, resolute response to deal adequately with the manifest menace.

With 17 dead, last week in Paris seems unlikely to become a watershed event. After all, the Madrid train bombings left 191 dead and 1,800 wounded in 2004; the London subway bombing 52 dead and 700 wounded in 2005; the Mumbai attacks almost 170 killed and over 600 injured in 2008, and the Moscow metro bombing 40 dead and over 100 injured in 2010. This of course is but a minute sample of a long, gory list of post 9/11 Muslim massacres, carried out in the name of their religious belief.

Islam’s bloody borders

It is difficult to see why the ordeal in Paris, gruesome as it was, will produce the required stiffening of resolve.

After all, the incipient clash between the Islamic and non-Islamic worlds has been part of the public discourse for over two decades. In his controversial – some might say, prescient – article “The Clash of Civilizations?” in Foreign Affairs (1993), the late Harvard political scientist Samuel Huntington predicted: “The fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future.” He warned: “… the great historic fault lines between civilizations are once more aflame. This is particularly true along the… boundaries of the… Islamic bloc of nations, from the bulge of Africa to central Asia…. Islam has bloody borders.”

In a subsequent book, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (1998), Huntington wrote: “No single statement in my Foreign Affairs article attracted more critical comment than: ‘Islam has bloody borders.’… Quantitative evidence from every disinterested source conclusively demonstrates its validity.”

It is possible to fill tomes with examples of obdurate Islamic enmity to Judaism and Christianity. But Islamic intolerance is not confined to the monotheistic People of the Book.

One of the most graphic illustrations of Islam’s abiding rejection of all that is not Islamic is provided by the 2001 destruction of the giant Buddha statues in Afghanistan.

The statues, which stood for 15 centuries (!) were designated by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site, and were perhaps the best-known cultural landmark of the region. Despite all this, and ignoring international appeals, the Taliban government reduced the statues to rubble, in a determined, prolonged and complex effort.

According to the then-Afghan culture minister, 400 religious clerics from across the country decided the “statues were un-Islamic.”

The Taliban’s spiritual leader and supreme commander Mullah Muhammad Omar, proclaimed: “Muslims should be proud of smashing idols. It has given praise to God that we have destroyed them.” The then-foreign minister told a Japanese daily: “We are destroying the Buddha statues in accordance with Islamic law… it is purely a religious issue.”

This implacable enmity toward the un-Islamic is reflected in the appalling statistics regarding Islamic violence.

Some estimates indicate that since 9/11, there have been a staggering 25,000 lethal acts of Islamic terrorism.

Islam’s bloody innards

In his Al-Azhar address, Sisi issued a stern warning: “… this umma [Islamic world] is being torn, it is being destroyed, it is being lost – and it is being lost by our own hands.” The warning is timely and accurate.

For, as I pointed out in last week’s column, as appalling as Muslim violence against non-Muslims might be, it pales into insignificance when compared to violence among Muslims themselves.

In a sense, Sisi was echoing views Huntington articulated in his book: “Islam’s borders are bloody and so are its innards. The fundamental problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilization whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and… obsessed with the inferiority of their power.”

Judging from the scope of the carnage, Islam’s innards are if anything bloodier than its borders, and the enmity for fellow Muslims far outstrips that for the infidel.

Quite apart from the well-known Sunni- Shia rift that has resulted in untold deaths, the myriad massacres in mosques, marketplaces and madrassas across Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere in the Muslim-dominated Dar a-Salaam (Zone of Peace) make it impossible for anyone other than a learned expert to decipher the patterns of intra-Islamic rivalries and the reasons for their lethal consequences.

Sisi’s passionate cry that the Muslim world is being torn apart at its own hands is corroborated everyday by a never-ending stream of blood-soaked facts.

‘No stronger retrograde force exists…’

Well over 100 years ago, in his book The River War (1899), Winston Churchill predicted with stunning prescience much of the realities which Sisi laments in his New Year address: “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful, fatalistic apathy.”

Churchill warned of adverse effects on Muslim economies and societies: “The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live… the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”

On Islam’s attitude to women, he wrote: “The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.”

Regarding conflict with the West, he provided an ominous caveat: “Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science… the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome… ”

Given the situation in Europe today, this is a prognosis that should not be lightly dismissed.

Ataturk or Anwar Sadat?

It’s difficult to overstate the importance that Sisi’s speech could have – and equally important to exercise sober caution in developing excessively optimistic expectations as to the practical impact it may have.

Earlier this week, the influential US columnist George Will raised both the prospects and the perils: “…as head of the Egyptian state, Al Sisi occupies an office once occupied by Anwar Sadat who was murdered by Islamic extremists for his opening to Israel. This was an act of tremendous bravery by Sisi, and if the Nobel Peace Prize committee is looking for someone who plausibly deserves it, they could start there.”

Will Sisi be able to initiate a Kemalist-like transformation of Egypt as Kemal Ataturk did in Turkey just under a hundred years ago (and now disintegrating rapidly under the Islamist Erdogan regime)? The answer is far from certain. The times and circumstances in today’s Egypt are vastly different – and arguably more daunting – than those in post-WWI Turkey.

Egypt faces almost insurmountable socioeconomic challenges, and failure by Sisi to address them adequately will provide his numerous radical opponents much grist for their extremist mills to grind.

Recent reports (The Jerusalem Post, January 12) that a newly exposed Islamic State-affiliated cell that “planned to assassinate government ministers, media personalities and businessmen in the coming days” dramatically underscore how a tragic rerun of political assassination in Egypt cannot be discounted.

So while Sisi’s endeavor should be warmly applauded – and supported – its chances of success are sufficiently uncertain – indeed, remote – that it would be more than imprudent of the West and for Israel to make any assumption of such success a basis for future policy.

Sisi, ISIS & Israel

The outcome of the titan battle between Sisi and Islamic State will, of course, have dramatic impact on Israel, particularly with regard to the fate of Sinai, and the ramifications this will have on our long southern border and the city of Eilat.

But that is a topic for another – and somewhat depressing – article in the future.

Martin Sherman (www.martinsherman.org) is the founder and executive director of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies http://www.strategicisrael.org.

Felix Quigley writes…Many have written on this but they completely miss the point and misread the situation. The Butchery in Charlie Hebco and the Jewish shop on Paris (and it is often overlooked that in Charlie’s the Jewish woman was picked out because she was a Jew) the point being that it has created an entirely different situation.

The Israeli politicians are proceeding as if it was the same.

The old himming and hamming in Israel has to end because it will not work anymore.In one sense they are right. Why should French Jews come and be attacked by Arabs in Judea? Why? That is a total sacrilege.

The fact is that the French situation poses new rsponsibilities on the Israeli leaders none of whom including Bennett are able to take the measures needed. THAT is the point.

Meretz Chairman MK Zahava Gal-On intends to petition the Attorney General to stop plans from Minister of Construction Uri Ariel (Jewish Home) to house immigrants from France in Judea and Samaria.

Ariel sent a letter asking the Yesha Council where the flow of immigrants from France could settle, as France reels from a string of anti-Semitic attacks.

France led the list of countries from which Jews made aliyah to Israel in 2014, with almost 7,000 new French immigrants, more than double the 3,400 who came last year. Aliyah is only expected to increase after the latest spate of anti-Semitic attacks.

Ariel ordered officials from the Ministry of Housing and Construction and the Israel Lands Authority to plan the expansion of Judea and Samaria communities, which have suffered multiple building freezes, to absorb immigrants.

“There is no doubt that the French Jews feel deep sympathy with the settlement enterprise in Judea and Samaria,” Ariel wrote, “and they may want to reside there.”

Gal-On vowed Wednesday to contact Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein to contest the plan, following a similar reaction from far-left Channel 2 commentator Amnon Abramovich.

Abramovich argued that French Jews, who are already fleeing from a rising tide of Islamism in their home country, would feel distinctly uncomfortable moving to a region whereby the Jewish communities are surrounded by Arabs – and, often, villages with high levels of support for Hamas. France has seen a sharp rise in anti-Semitism in recent years, and it flared particularly in 2014 and during Operation Protective Edge, with violent protests in Paris.

Labor leaders Tzipi Livni and Yitzhak Herzog further slammed the plan as a “cynical move that will hurt Israel’s international standing” that will “deepen the isolation Bibi [Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu – ed.] got us into” and “deeply hurt our relations with world Jewry.”

Also see Pamela Geller for this story…Muslim Cleric Leads Funeral Prayer For Charlie Hebdo Jihadis, Justifies Murder By Precedent Set By Muhammad There is a large part of the Muslim world that celebrates and supports the slaughter of the Charlie Hebdo journalists and cartoonists in the cause of Muhammad. Instead, we are bullied into talking only of those Muslims who are not strapping one on. Why? “Indian Islamic Cleric Maulana Naseeruddin Leads Funeral Prayer For Charlie Hebdo – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/#sthash.oHdr4dNw.dpuf

FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…WHAT A CONTRAST WITH THE COWARDLY AND PRO-ISLAM STALINIST LEFT OF TODAY IS GEERT WILDERS! HE REFERS TO “The denial that Islam is the cause” AND THIS IS PRACTISED BY ALL OF THE LEFT OF TODAY, ALL OF THEM, AND THAT JUST MEANS THAT THE TROTSKYIST ALTERNATIVE, AUTHENTIC TROTSKYISM, MUST BE CONSTRUCTED. THE LEFT IS NOT THE CAUSE THOUGH. THE REAL CAUSE IS THAT THE SYSTEM OF CAPITALISM ROTS TO THE CORE AND THESE REVISIONIST SOCIALISTS ARE SIMPLY REFLECTING THE ANTISEMITISM INHERENT WITHIN CAPITALISM. BUT THAT IS A LONGER STORY. FOR NOW I SALUTE THIS RESPONSE BY GEERT WILDERS!

Many thanks to SimonXML for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

English transcript:

Madam President, I am extremely angry. I am furious. Frankly, my party is furious. Furious that once again there have been innocent victims of Islam. Jews, critics of Islam, innocent people.

And also very angry because there are the same politically correct responses. The denial that Islam is the cause. The failure to make the Netherlands safer.

And, madam president, I wonder how many more debates will be needed, how many more attacks there will have to be, how many more innocent people will have to die before the penny drops. Before the cabinet and the majority of this Chamber wake up. It’s enough to drive you mad.

I don’t understand it at all, and I am justifiably extremely angry about it. Not just because I am also on the Al-Qaeda hit list, but because this concerns the safety of the Netherlands. The safety of the Dutch.

What is needed, madam president, and what is currently missing is a good analysis of the cause and the right solution for all this terror. The cause, madam president, is of course Islam. Islam that declared war against us a long time ago. The Islamization of the Free West. Of the Netherlands. Of Europe.

Of course there are peaceful Muslims. But there is no such thing as peaceful Islam. And of course not all Muslims are terrorists. And anyone who still dares to deny that there is a link between the terror and Islam is crazy.

Madam President, Islamization is a life-threatening danger. For decades, mass immigration has been bringing hundreds of thousands of people from an alien culture to Europe. To our country. Why do we import all this misery? Madam President, everywhere, wherever it comes, Islam brings us hate and violence. In every country where Islam is strong it is at the cost of freedom. Freedom of speech, of journalists, minorities, everyone.

Madam president, and that’s without mentioning the terror organizations such as the Islamic State, Al Qaeda, Al Nusra, to name just a few.

Islam, madam president, simply does not belong in the Netherlands. It is a danger to the Netherlands. We must de-Islamize.

Madam President, apart from this analysis, what is particularly shocking is the total inanity of the terror measures. I find it inconceivable that after all these years of debate, the Cabinet proposes measures that will cause more problems in the Netherlands rather than fewer. How is it possible — I can’t explain it to anyone in our country — that Jihadis who want to go to Syria to do the most horrific things there, are stopped? It’s unbelievable. Let them go! All of them! We should be glad to see the back of them.

We don’t do that, the Cabinet doesn’t do that. They don’t even put the people they stop in prison, leaving ticking time bombs, Islamic terrorists, to roam free in the Netherlands. That should not be possible!

Let the people leave, madam president, but never let them come back. Take away their passports, revoke the Schengen Treaty and reinstate border controls. That legislative proposals are now being made that we should have seen ten years ago. Ten years ago. That is what the Netherlands deserved and that is what the analysis justifies.

And I completely fail to understand why the Cabinet lets the Jihadists come back. How stupid can you be?

Of the people that have returned, I believe that three have been imprisoned and the rest have been left free to walk around. It’s enough to drive you mad. Madam President, from all other Schengen countries — that’s 25 not counting the Netherlands — people can also simply come to the Netherlands. Thousands of terrorists. According to Europol, 5,000 can simply come to the Netherlands.

What in heaven’s name are you doing? I’m not speaking in Chinese, am I? Surely we don’t want all those people to come to the Netherlands?

Madam President, what I also don’t understand is that the army is deployed to Mali, is deployed to Afghanistan, while it should of course be protecting vital points in the Netherlands such as railway stations, airports, shopping malls and streets. Yesterday, the front page of a national newspaper had a report that Amsterdam is a target. What are the military doing in Mali? Let them protect this country.

Madam President, these are big words but I do mean them. Of course the Cabinet is not responsible for every attack. But if someone who could have been stopped when coming back to the Netherlands. Or if someone that the Cabinet prevented from going to Syria without putting them in prison. Or if someone comes to the Netherlands from another Schengen country and carries out an attack, this Cabinet has blood on its hands. And that is a terrible thing to have to say.

And, Prime Minister, never say that you were not warned. In the last ten years I have told you and your predecessors a thousand times. You will never be able to get away with the words “wir haben es nicht gewusst”. You did know. You have known it for years.

So make the right analysis, make the Netherlands safer. Do not drive myself and the Netherlands to despair. Put an end to the incompetence.

This, madam president, after all these years, is no longer party politics. It concerns the safety of our country. The safety of our citizens. And the Cabinet lets it happen.

Madam president, fortunately, the tide in Europe and in the Netherlands is turning. More and more people in Europe are fed up with all the people who look the other way. In Germany, 40,000 people took to the streets the other night to demonstrate against Islamization. Parties such as the PVV are growing throughout the whole of Europe.

People have had enough. Enough of Islamization. Enough of members of the political elite who look the other way.

And I have been telling the Prime Minister, even though he will not listen to me. You cannot put the genie back in the bottle. They are the people, not you. They will turn the tide, madam president, and turn it must.