Dog training methods: their use, effectiveness and interaction with behaviour and welfare | Blog | AVSAB
AVSAB | American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior
Welcome Guest!
Home
Log In | Become a Member
Search:
About
General Information
Mission Statement
Executive Board
Contact Info
Membership
Membership Benefits
Membership Benefits-Members Only
Become A Member
Membership FAQ
Resources
Overview
AVSAB Forum
Newsletter Info
Newsletter Archive
Behavior Consultants Near You
Find an Expert to Interview
Speakers Bureau
Opportunities for Veterinarians
Upcoming Seminars, Conferences, & Lectures
Position Statements
History Forms & Behavior Handouts
Annual Meeting Minutes & Treasurer's Reports
Annual Symposium
Information & Registration
Previous Year Proceedings
Students
Student Information
Opportunities for Students
Student Chapters
Student Testimonials
Case Studies for Students
Student Forums
Find A Speaker
Chapter Application and Renewal Guidelines
Constitution and Bylaws
Blog
AVSAB BLOG
May 27, 2013
by Miranda Logan
Category: Dog Behavior
Dog training methods: their use, effectiveness and interaction with behaviour and welfare
Abstract: Historically, pet dogs were trained using mainly negative reinforcement or punishment, but positive reinforcement using rewards has recently become more popular. The methods used may have different impacts on the dogs' welfare. We distributed a questionnaire to 364 dog owners in order to examine the relative effectiveness of different training methods and their effects upon a pet dog's behaviour. When asked how they trained their dog on seven basic tasks, 66% reported using vocal punishment, 12% used physical punishment, 60% praise (social reward), 51% food rewards and 11% play. The owner's ratings for their dog's obedience during eight tasks correlated positively with the number of tasks which they trained using rewards (P<0.01), but not using punishment (P=0.5). When asked whether their dog exhibited any of the 16 common problematic behaviours, the number of problems reported by the owners correlated with the number of tasks for which their dog was trained using punishment (P<0.001), but not using rewards (P=0.17). Exhibition of problematic behaviours may be indicative of compromised welfare, because such behaviours can be caused by - or result in - a state of anxiety and may lead to a dog being relinquished or abandoned. Because punishment was associated with an increased incidence of problematic behaviours, we condluce that it may represent a welfare concern without concurrent benefits in obedience. We suggest that positive training methods may be more useful to the pet-owning community.