The lease for professional use boasts a prominent place in the judicial treatment of the company's difficulties. However the seat of an independent legal system of the lease for professional use as part of collective procedures still faces in the OHADA law to significant gaps. Preserved and adapted according derogatory mechanisms, lease for professional use proof collective procedures shows a duality of legal rules to govern the fate of that concurrent contractual link. In this context, the prerogatives of the actors of the lease contract to professional use are subject, despite the avowed intention of the legislature OHADA to remarkable deficiencies. The lack of legal regulation of collective procedure lessor despite the consideration involved coexists with regulatory lessee still below international standards.