Video: Jarrett, roundtable

Transcript of: Jarrett, roundtable

MR. DAVID GREGORY:This Sunday,
Christmas
week ends with a flurry of activity in
Washington
, and the
White House
scores some key victories.

PRES. BARACK OBAMA:I want to thank the
Democrats
and
Republicans
who put conviction ahead of politics to get this done together.

MR. GREGORY:But after the break, major challenges await the president in the new year: high unemployment, the war in
Afghanistan
, a ballooning deficit, and Republican rule, at least in the
House of Representatives
. Where does the
Obama
team go from here? With us this morning, senior adviser
Valerie Jarrett
. Then, taking stock of
2010
.

PRES. OBAMA:It is the
law of the land
.

MR. GREGORY:The passage of
healthcare reform
, the shock of an oil disaster in the gulf, the rise of the
tea party
, and the ongoing struggles of millions of
Americans
looking for work in a still fragile
economy
. Where has it all left the
country
politically? And will it be possible for the two parties to find any
common ground
in
2010
? With us, our
politicalroundtable
:
NBC Newsspecial correspondentTom Brokaw
; historian and author
Doris Kearns Goodwin
, columnist for
The Wall Street Journal Peggy Noonan
, and
Washington Post
associate editor
Bob Woodward
.

Announcer:From
NBC News
in
Washington
,
MEET THE PRESS
with
David Gregory
.

MR. GREGORY:Good morning. Before departing to
Hawaii
to join his family for the
Christmas holiday
, the president picked up

several major legislative victories during this lame duck session of Congress:the
tax cut
deal, the repeal of the ban on
gays in the military
, and the hard-fought passage of the
new STARTarms control treaty
with
Russia
.

PRES. OBAMA:A lot of folks in this town predicted that after the
midterm elections
,
Washington
would be headed for more partisanship and more gridlock. And, instead, this has been a season of progress for the
American people
.

MR. GREGORY:And here to talk with us about the president's agenda heading into
2011
, the top
White House
adviser and close friend of the president's
Valerie Jarrett
.
Happy holidays
,
Valerie
. Welcome back to
MEET THE PRESS
.

MS. VALERIE JARRETT:Thank you,
David
, and same to you and your family, of
course
.

MR. GREGORY:Thank you. "A season of progress," the president called it. And it was just
November 3
the president was talking about a shellacking that he was responsible for in the
midterm election
. Then some unexpected victories in this
lame duck session
. What happened in that interim time, from the president's point of view? Was there a
course
correction that he ushered in?

MS. JARRETT:Well, I think as the president said right after the
election
, what we heard and what the nation said during the
election
is, is that they really wanted to see
Congress
and the president and the administration in
Washington
working together. They wanted us to deliver on behalf of the
American people
.
And I
think what we saw over the
course
of the last few weeks is just that. We made enormous progress, as you pointed out, from the
taxes
where, you know, everyone, when they get their next paycheck, instead of their
taxes
going up, they're going to go down with a
payroll tax
, with an
earned income tax credit
, with a
child care
tax credit, with a credit so that we can afford to send
children
to
college
, and, and importantly, a credit so that companies will invest and they can take a hundred percent of their expenses now to create jobs for
America
. So that sends a very positive signal.
The STARTtreaty
, probably the president's single most important
foreign policy
accomplishment. In fact, the, the most successful
treaty
in the -- in decades was just passed as well. And then you mentioned "Don't_Ask,_Don't_Tell." Now we'll be able to have
gays and lesbians
serve their
country
proudly in the
military
. And it's a
military
that's based on trust, and so now they'll be able to serve proudly and represent our
country
. These are all major accomplishments that were achieved on a bipartisan basis with
Congress
and the president, both sides of the aisle working together.

MR. GREGORY:You know, the vice president, who was on the
program
last week, responded to a question of mine about when people think about the president, do they -- are they able to sort of pin him down? You know, what is he exactly? A liberal, moderate, a centrist or what? And he had, he had this response in part. I want to play it for you.

VICE PRES. JOE BIDEN:What he is, is he is a progressive leader who, in fact, understands that politics is all in the art of the, the possible.

MR. GREGORY:And that's -- "the art of the possible," to a lot of observers, is a marked
change
from how he campaigned as somebody who was going to
changeWashington
,
change
the way
Washington
operated. Has he made a shift in his own mind to say, "I've got to
change
tactics here, I've got to
change
strategy here in order to achieve some of the things that I want to achieve"?

MS. JARRETT:No, I don't think so. I think the president that we are seeing now is a -- is the same
person
that I've known for over 20 years. When the president was in the
state Senate
, he had a reputation for being able to work very closely with people
on the other side
of the aisle and forge that compromise that's pragmatic. He never lets the perfect be the enemy of the good, and I think that that's his reputation. Early on in the administration I think the
Republicans
made a concerted decision to really oppose what we did.
And I
think what we saw after the midterm is a president who said, "I'm going to reach out more, I'm going to try harder," and they reciprocated. And that's, I think, what the people want.

MR. GREGORY:And is that really the issue here? The tax deal sort of cleared out some of the underbrush here, and now there's more
opportunity
for real engagement, real agreement?

MS. JARRETT:Well, I hope so. I mean, I don't know about clearing out the underbrush. I think it's an example of what we can do when everybody says, "What's most important to me?" And what the president said was most important to him was not to raise
taxes
on the
middle class
, was to make sure that those who were unemployed have 13 months of benefits. Those are the ones who are going to go out, they're going to pay their rent, they're going to buy groceries, they're going to buy other household supplies, they're going to be able to afford
Christmas
presents for their
children
. That's going to grow the
economy
and create jobs. What was important to the
Republicans
was to have
tax breaks
for the very wealthy and the
estate tax
provisions. And so when you marry the two, you ended up with a package that was able to get the bipartisan
support
that we needed.

MR. GREGORY:But the, the...

MS. JARRETT:So in a sense, everybody got what they wanted.

MR. GREGORY:But this was a candidate who wrote in one of the memoirs that extending
Bush tax cuts
for the wealthy was morally troubling. So a lot of the core supporters who came out in, in unprecedented numbers in
2008
see this as caving, or they see it as weakness. They don't see it as somebody who is a progressive, who believes that politics is the art of the possible.

MS. JARRETT:Well, I guess what I would say is what the president wakes up every morning focusing on is what's best for the
American people
, what's not -- not what's in his short-term
political
calculus, but what's really important to the
American people
. And what he did not want to have happen on
January 1
was to see our
economy
that, although it is improving, is still very fragile. And he did not want to have people see their
taxes
go up, and he knew that's what was going to happen. So he wasn't looking for a peer
victory
. He wasn't going to just
fight
just to
fight
and take that chance. And so, what he realized is that he had to be pragmatic, but he was being pragmatic in order to deliver for the
American people
. And that's really what I think you have to focus your attention for, and that's what he views every decision he makes. He has two priorities -- and the vice president said this, again, last week on your show -- grow our
economy
, create jobs; and keep
America
safe.

MR. GREGORY:But he...

MS. JARRETT:And so every decision he makes is measured against that test.

MR. GREGORY:But still, as president, you do have to
fight
some things. He talked about it after the midterms. You got to
fight
how things are done in
Washington
. He told
Jon Stewart
recently that "yes, we can" is still "yes, we can," but "yes, we can, but." I mean, is that now the story of the next year, that that
Obama
agenda has to be tempered by the realities of
Washington
?

MS. JARRETT:Well, we do have to accept the realities that the
Republicans
did win the
House
. And so they now have a responsibility to lead as well. And we can't ignore the realities of the membership and the makeup of
Congress
, and the fact that we are going to need bipartisan
support
to get things done. That is a reality. There are certain things the president won't compromise. So, for example, the
Republicans
wanted the
high incometax breaks
to be permanent. And what the president said is, "No, we can't afford it. In the new year, we're really going to have to tackle our deficit, and so we're not going to extend those
tax breaks
for the very wealthy indefinitely. We can't afford it, and it's going to be important that we control our deficit and, and we tighten our belts." So that's something he is willing to
fight
for, and we'll see in the next year and the year after that he's going to
fight
very hard when those two-year extensions expire to cut off the
income
break for the very wealthy.

MR. GREGORY:You, you are, among other parts of your portfolio, someone who is a liaison with the
business community
in
America
from the
White House
for this president. The president's had a strained relationship with the
business community
, I don't have to tell you that. He's acknowledged it. He did so after the
midterm election
, talked about bankers as fat cats, and, and others that led business to really think that he was hostile toward them. What does this tax package do to get people back to work, and what is the new area of cooperation between the
White House
and the
business community
to get the
economy
moving?

MS. JARRETT:Well, let's
put it in
context and let's, let's keep in mind what was going on when the president took office. Our
financial institutions
were crumbling, on the break of disaster. Our
economy
was in a free fall. The
stock market
was crashing. People were seeing their life savings destroyed. Businesses were, were having to lay off people -- in fact, the last six months of the prior administration we lost four million jobs. It was a, it was a period of turmoil. And the president had to take several bold and decisive steps, some of them unpopular, to right our
economy
and get us on the right track. Just last week, the president had a group of about 20
CEOs
from around the
country
come in and talk about how can we grow the
economy
? How can we get some of the dollars that have been sitting on the balance sheet invested? And it was a very good session where we spent four and a half hours really talking about what we have in common.
And I
think what you're going to see going forward is an enormous amount of cooperation around exports, around
free trade
, making sure that the
Korean Free Trade Agreement
where the president lobbied very hard to open up export opportunities for
U.S.
companies gets passed through
Congress
; focusing on public education, making sure that our
community colleges
are training people in a way where there'll be real jobs at the end of the training. There's so many ways that businesses and, and the president are aligned right now. And what he said to them is, "Look, if you guys succeed, if you create jobs, if you invest in
America
, if we're able to help you compete in a globally competitive marketplace, then the
country
wins." And that's what the president wants.

MR. GREGORY:The president spoke after the midterms about a difficulty that he has had connecting with the
American people
, living in the bubble of the
White House
and being in the bubble of the
presidency
. He talked about, as I said, after the midterm. Let me play a portion of what he said.

PRES. OBAMA:When you're in this place, it is hard not to seem removed, and one of the challenges that we've got to think about is, is, is how do I meet my responsibilities here in the
White House
, which require a lot of -- lot of hours and a lot of work, you know, but still, you know, have that
opportunity
to engage with the
American people
on a, on a day-to-day basis and know -- give, give them confidence that I'm listening to them.

MR. GREGORY:You know him as well or better than anybody working in the
White House
.

MS. JARRETT:Yes.

MR. GREGORY:How does he do a better job of connecting with the
American people
when so many are hurting?

MS. JARRETT:Well, he often says that this is his biggest regret, is that when he took office, because of the crisis that was presented to him, he had to spend almost every waking hour in
Washington
focusing very hard on solving that crisis, and what he missed sorely was the engagement with the
American people
. He said it right before he left for vacation. He said, "When I get back, I really want to figure out a way where I can spend more time outside of
Washington
listening and learning and engaging with the
American people
." It's really what gives him his
energy
and his strength, and so we're determined in the new year to make sure that his schedule reflects that priority.

MR. GREGORY:We are in midst of a
permanent campaign
, and the, the campaign of
2012
is already
upon us
.
And I
found it interesting in one of the president's recent interviews, he said about a potential presidential aspirant,
Sarah Palin
, that he doesn't think about her. Do you think he should?

MS. JARRETT:Well, you know what I think? As the president of the
United States
, his obligation is to think about all of
Americans
every day. He has to wake up in the morning, he has to think about growing our
economy
, he has to think about keeping us safe. He needs to keep focused on the on the prize, and I believe...

MR. GREGORY:But he also thinks about
political
opponents.

MS. JARRETT:Well, but you know what, I think as president his job is really to focus first on that. And if he does that job well...

MR. GREGORY:Mm-hmm.

MS. JARRETT:...if he looks out for
America
, if it's clear that he's doing everything he can to make sure that hard-working
Americans
who've lost their jobs can go back to work, and if he keeps
America
safe and he demonstrates that, 24/7, that's his priority, then I think the politics will take care of itself.

MR. GREGORY:Do you think he should be paying to attention to her as a
political
threat?

MS. JARRETT:I think he shouldn't be distracted by what are perceived as threats. I mean, I think -- I really go back to what I'm saying. Because he's the president of the
United States
, he's not out there running the way he was before when he was the
U.S. senator
, where you have to think about everybody in the field every second of the day. The American people expect him to lead. He's their president, he's everybody's president regardless of
party
affiliation. And that doesn't mean that at some point he's not going to get out there and, and launch a campaign. But the most important thing that he can do for the
American people
is think of them every single day and let them guide his actions.

MR. GREGORY:Finally, your role in the
White House
is unique. I mean, for those of us who, who
cover
politics, who
cover
administrations, you have a lot of responsibility as an adviser, but you're also one of the president's closest friends and have helped to mentor him and develop him as a
political
figure. What role do you play for him in that way? What is unique about it, and how do you help strengthen him?

MS. JARRETT:Well, I think the president's lucky to be surrounded by a strong group, both within the
White House
as well as his
Cabinet
of people, who he trusts and who he relies on for advice. I think the fact that I'm a friend who's there, who's known him for a long time, provides me with the ability to be a sounding board in, in one way. But I think that what's important to know about the president is he really listens to a variety of different voices, a diversity of opinion, and that's what really gives him the
energy
and the ability to think creatively and innovatively. And when, when you see the president engage with a room full of people, he calls on not just the people he's known for 20 years, but the new stranger who's walked in the room who might be the junior
person
at the table, but who has a new idea for how we can grow our
country
and make it strong, how we can compete internationally. He has an almost insatiable appetite for new ideas from wherever he goes. When he's walking along a rope line, oftentimes people will lean in and whisper suggestions to him, and he comes back and he tells his economic team -- some of the smartest people in the
country
-- "This is what I heard today. What do you think about this idea?"
And I
think that that's what you really want in a president, somebody who's innovative, who's creative, who's always looking for new ideas, and who surrounds himself with a divorce -- diverse and robust group of people. And, and I consider privileged to be at his service.

MR. GREGORY:Up next, taking stock of
2010
.
Healthcare reform
, the oil disaster in the gulf, the rise of the
tea party
and the ongoing
economic crisis
, where has it all left the
country
politically? Our
roundtable
weighs in:
NBC
's
Tom Brokaw
, historian and author
Doris Kearns Goodwin
,
The Wall Street Journal
's
Peggy Noonan
, and the
Washington Post
's
Bob Woodward
.

MR. GREGORY:Coming up, our
roundtable
examines where
2010
has left the
country
politically. And will it be possible for the two parties to find any
common ground
in
2011
? After this brief
commercial break
.

MR. GREGORY:And we are back, joined now by our special
politicalroundtable
: historian and author
Doris Kearns Goodwin
;
Washington Post
associate editor
Bob Woodward
; columnist for
The Wall Street Journal
,
Peggy Noonan
; and our own
NBC Newsspecial correspondent
,
Tom Brokaw
. Welcome to all of you,
happy holidays
. There's so much to go through.
Tom Brokaw
, you think about the
lame duck session
, how this year ends for
President Obama
, and all these people are talking about the "comeback kid" and "look what he accomplished." You know, on
November 3
in the shellacking of the midterm it wasn't supposed to work out this way. What happened?

MR. TOM BROKAW:Well, let's not get ahead of ourselves here. I mean, we've got a
long way to go
and there are a lot of big problems that are still out there. But I do think that he's had a good month, obviously. I think that -- and it's due in a large part to the fact that he seemed to be in charge, that he was leading from the front and not from the back as the guy who was kind of consulting with everybody on the
Hill
before he made a decision. He stepped up, and the
country
was ready for this kind of action, and the
Republicans
, I think, to some degree, got caught a little bit flat-footed by his eagerness to get the deal done in the way that he did and the way that he stood down the
Democrats
who weren't happy about it.

MR. GREGORY:Well, let's pick up on that,
Doris
, because at the end of the week he signs a signature piece of legislation, and that is the repeal of "Don't_Ask,_Don't_Tell," which prohibited
gays and lesbians
from serving openly in the
military
. This was a way to mitigate some of the damage on the left, to say, "Look, this was a
campaign promise
. I got this done. You may not like that I'm dealing with the
Republicans
in other ways, but I got this done." And on this issue, the, the politics were too difficult for the
Republicans
to stay united in opposition.

MS. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN:Right. It's one of those moments when it was an idea whose time had come. And the gay movement deserves a lot of credit for making the whole way we think about gays different now. But it's very fortunate for
Obama
, I think, that that came at the same time as the
tax cut
, which a lot of the people on the left were upset about. But, you know, presidents in history are always upset about the people in their own
party
who criticize them. And
Teddy Roosevelt
used to say, "Oh, they're
Tom Foolery
guys. They're lunatic fringe." But
on the other hand
, they need them. They need them to push in from the outside in so that what they can get done is larger than it might otherwise be. So I
understand
why he got irritated, but I think,
on the other hand
, it was great that he had that combination so he could say, "Yeah, this is -- I did this, but look,
on the other hand
, I did the
tax cut
."

MR. BOB WOODWARD:I mean, it's, it's real, and the, the repeal of "Don't_Ask,_Don't_Tell" is a
big deal
. That's a -- that is a movement in
civil rights
...

MS. GOODWIN:Right.

MR. WOODWARD:...that will be noted for a long time and perhaps forever. At the same time, there, there's something about
Obama
that is not connecting with the people.
And I
was trying to think, you know, what is that? And somebody was telling me about this wake and gathering that
Richard Holbrooke
's widow,
Kati
, had in
New York
after he died.
Holbrooke
being the Afghan/
Pakistan
negotiator for
Obama
who died. And at this gathering,
Bill Clinton
walked in. And, of
course
,
Clinton
always takes over a room, and he put his arm around
Kati
, the widow, and started talking and saying that
Richard Holbrooke
had been somebody who always fought, who believed in peace. And somebody who was there told me, he said suddenly everyone in the room was involved in
Bill Clinton
's emotions. And that's what
Obama
has to do. He has to find a way to make these things personal, not abstract. He's so cerebral, he's so smart, he appears cool. And he's got to get in there and make those connections with, with the people in the unemployment line, the
assembly line
, in the mountains of
Afghanistan
.

MS. GOODWIN:You know, I agree with you. But the very steadiness that allowed him to come back from
Scott Brown
's
victory
, which seemed like he was dead in January, and then he brought
health care
...

MR. GREGORY:Who succeeded
Ted Kennedy
, of
course
.

MS. GOODWIN:Exactly. And now allowed him to come back from the shellacking in the midterm, that's a strength to neither be too high or too low, and to keep that steadiness. I'm sure at times you want him to yell, you want him to
fight
, you want him to show more emotion, but maybe those qualities don't often come together in the same
person
.

MR. WOODWARD:But as, as a manager, he did a great job. It's masterful. But as something connecting with the average voter, he's not yet there, and that's how you win.

MR. GREGORY:Peggy
...

MS. PEGGY NOONAN:Can I throw in, too?

MR. WOODWARD:Yeah.

MS. NOONAN:I got -- on an issue like -- considering the president's position right now, an issue like "Don't_Ask,_Don't_Tell" is perfect. Here's why. It's a liberal issue, it's a left issue, fine. But it was in line with centrist thinking. The center supported the
change
. When a president of the left can make leftist moves with centrist
support
, he's going to be OK. Rightist president, the same thing. So always keep in, in mind the center. I would say also,
Bob
, as, as an extenuation to your remarks, I think the president has to regain his mystique, you know. The
presidency
has a mystique, it has certain weight. It has a, a certain gravitational pull. I think the president walked into the
White House
with a certain mystique. I think he lost it in his first two years. He needs to gain it back. That's my read.

MR. GREGORY:Tom
, I want to pull out a little bit farther, but before I do, I want to follow up on something specific about "Don't_Ask,_Don't_Tell." There's still a lot of questions about how this gets implemented, and then there's another question about
military recruiting
on
college
campuses. My own wife, as you know, was part of the
ROTCprogram
at
Princeton
, as a lot of
Americans
were who were in the
military
and are no longer in the
military
. Is that the next step here, to take that on?

MR. BROKAW:Well, take it on is quite another question. The
military
has mixed feelings about whether they want to go back to
Harvard
, go back to
Columbia
, go back to the
Ivy League
schools. It's expensive.

MR. GREGORY:Hm.

MR. BROKAW:ROTC
programs, and it's whether they get a big enough bang for their buck. Do they get enough kids who sign up for it at the elite institutions to go into a commissioned
program
of some kind? Or are they better off working at the
land grant
schools where they're going to get generally a greater response to it. So that's an issue. Now, the
Ivy League
and elite institutions are beginning to say, "We would welcome them back, we want to open that conversation again," because of the repeal of "Don't_Ask,_Don't_Tell." But you may find the
military
saying, you know, "I'm not sure that we need to go there because, frankly, it's just not a
happy hunting ground
for us. We're not going to get that many people."

MR. WOODWARD:No, but it's important. I did
naval ROTC
in
college
back...

MR. BROKAW:Yeah.

MR. WOODWARD:...in, you know, the
Coolidge administration
or whenever it was.

MR. BROKAW:Right.

MR. WOODWARD:And it is...

MR. BROKAW:Not Wilson.

MR. WOODWARD:It is important for the
military
to connect there with exactly the point you made recently...

MR. BROKAW:Right.

MR. WOODWARD:...in your op/ed piece...

MR. GREGORY:Right.

MR. WOODWARD:...about this disconnect between those who serve and people who kind of say, "Oh, no, not that, that's not for me." And one way to do that is to, to bring it, bring it -- bring
ROTC
everywhere.

MR. BROKAW:Well, here's what I think,
Bob
. I've actually been thinking about this a fair amount, and I -- what I would do is, if not do it campus by campus, if you go to
Boston
, for example, you could do an
MIT
/
Harvardprogram
and put a couple of the institutions together and have a central
ROTCprogram
drawing on all the institutions. If you do it by institution by institution, with the questions that the
military
already has about a lot of costs -- you got to put officers in those programs and training programs -- they may be better to do something that is more centralized.

MR. GREGORY:Let, let me, let me bring it back to some of the wider challenges that the president has faced this year. We can look at what's happened in the last couple of weeks, he had a strong finish, but this has been a tough year for the president, for
Democrats
.
AP
wrote about it, in summing it up, and started with the passage of
healthcare reform
. Quoting the president, "'This is what
change
looks like,'
Obama
said proudly, after the
health care
law passed. "But the economic recovery was too slow. The oil gushed for too long. The
health care
laws was too complicated. The
unemployment rate
too high. The
political discourse
too raw. The
tea party
too loud.
Americans
were in a foul mood, and
Democrats
got the blame." That's really the story of
2010
.

MS. NOONAN:Well, it's not -- the way that's written, it suggests it was a matter of fate. Oh, my goodness, decisions were made, they were not popular. You know,
health care
, two years into this drama, you can look at it, look at the numbers, and you realize people just don't love that. That, that was just the wrong...

MR. BROKAW:They don't
understand
it.

MS. GOODWIN:They don't
understand
it, yeah.

MR. GREGORY:Right.

MS. NOONAN:Well, when you're two years in and they still, everywhere across the
country
, are scratching their heads, that is almost the definition of a bad idea.

MR. GREGORY:But,
Tom
, do they not
understand
it, or do they
understand
too well...

MS. NOONAN:And the president gave his first 18 months to it.

MR. GREGORY:...that in fact it's going to help
poor people
in a tight
economy
?

MR. BROKAW:Well, there are two different answers to that,
David
. I think that a lot of small businesses
understand
it very well, and they say, "It's going to cost us more money, and we're going to move our employees into the
Medicaidprogram
or something else for their -- we're not going to be able to afford to
cover
them." People who are looking at it
from the ground up
are saying, "I don't get it." And it's 2,700 pages. Most of the major
health
institutions that I know in this
country
who are going to be responsible for the care are still trying to sort their way through it. At the very highest levels, they don't quite
understand
how it's going to work.

MS. GOODWIN:You know, I think one of the...

MS. NOONAN:Just politically, it was a misjudgment.

MR. BROKAW:Right.

MS. GOODWIN:Well, I'm not sure it was a misjudgment, but I think...

MS. NOONAN:Just a waste of time and reputation.

MS. GOODWIN:You mean to even do it, you think it was? I, I don't agree with that.

MS. NOONAN:To go down that road with that bill.

MS. GOODWIN:But I think that what hasn't been done, you know,
Bill Safire
always used to say, when he gave a speech, tell them what you're going to say, then tell them -- and then tell them what you told them. Somehow we never got straight what that, that
healthcare
bill was. A lot of people didn't
understand
what was in it, and that's a failure of the bully pulpit. Part of that is the rhetoric of the president. Part of it, it's really
hard to get
anything out to the
country
today because everything is so distracting.

MR. WOODWARD:I...

MS. GOODWIN:You give a speech on
health care
and the guy says,
Joe Wilson
says, "You lie," and that becomes the story.

MR. GREGORY:Right.

MR. WOODWARD:No, no, but I actually met somebody who read it, the whole thing, read it twice, and he, he confessed he didn't
understand
it.

MS. GOODWIN:Oh, that's a problem.

MR. WOODWARD:The complexity and...

MS. NOONAN:Yeah.

MR. WOODWARD:Now, one of the...

MS. NOONAN:The......a lot of it was just slapped in there. Nobody knows what's it all -- interpretive.

MR. WOODWARD:I don't think the
health care
and, and where that's going or, you know, how it gets changed or implemented is a peril to the
Obamapresidency
. I think there are other things, like the threat of terrorism, very, very real. And...

MR. BROKAW:Systemic unemployment. When they -- when it goes up 2 point -- when it goes up two-tenths of a point right before the
election
after they thought that they were on the right direction, that is a big signal. And my own guess is that it's probably a 12 or 13 percent of those people who are not looking for jobs anymore.

MS. GOODWIN:Right.

MR. GREGORY:But on
Peggy
's point, I think, whether it's about
health care
, the
government
stepped up, took some big whacks at policy, namely dealing with the
economy
, and a lot of people said, "Well, wait a minute, nothing's worked here. You know, you bailed out the banks -- started under
Bush
, you continued it -- the auto companies, you did
health care
, you did the stimulus, and we're still in the same position. I still don't have any equity in my
house
anymore, and I can't find a job." That's a role of
government
issue.

MS. NOONAN:There's also this, this -- growing from that, but part of what we're talking about is this -- the biggest
politicalchange
in the
United States
in my lifetime is the sense grown-ups have that their
children
will not have it better. It is a -- we are a happy people. You can walk along any street in
America right
now...

MR. GREGORY:Right.

MS. NOONAN:...and you can see people just doing
Christmas
and the
holidays
, and it's wonderful. But there is deep down, on the third level of thought, a, a strain of pessimism that I've never seen before.

MR. GREGORY:Well, and,
Peggy
, look at this from our recent
NBC News
/
Wall Street Journal
poll, people's views on the last -- on this last decade, that it's the worst decade in history at 54 percentile.

MS. NOONAN:Ah.

MR. BROKAW:Yeah.

MS. NOONAN:Well, part of that is
big things
happened at the beginning.

MR. BROKAW:But part of that because they're living through it.

MS. NOONAN:Well...

MR. BROKAW:Well, let me take them back to
1938
, for example...

MS. NOONAN:Yeah, exactly.

MR. BROKAW:...when the prospect of war and
World War II
, and the, and the recovery wasn't working as well as
FDR
had hoped it would in that year, and we still had bread lines in
America
, and the
country
was on its backside at that point.

MS. NOONAN:And we were hopeful.

MR. BROKAW:And, and how about the, how about the...

MS. NOONAN:Do you -- it was dreadful.

MR. BROKAW:...worst decade leading up to the
Civil War
, you know?

MS. GOODWIN:Yeah. And for those of us who are historians and who've lived in those other decades...

MR. BROKAW:Right.

MS. GOODWIN:...the
1860s
, the
1930s
, I'll still take this one, as troubling as it is.

MR. GREGORY:What about
course
correction, though? Because,
Bob
, you talked about connecting, and this issue of how the president positions himself to deal with the pessimism, to deal with systemic unemployment, the threat of terror. Politico wrote something interesting about "
Obama
2.0:
Reinventing
the
Presidency
," and wrote -- they wrote this: "'He needs to be CEO of
America
,' said former
White House chief of staffJohn Podesta
, an
Obama
sympathizer who ran his transition to power after the '
08 election
and is now urging him to dramatically refashion his
presidency
. "
The West Wing
makeover, as
Podesta
and others see it, would involve
Obama
no longer 'being
Velcroed
to the
Hill
' and giving more attention to powers of the
presidency
that don't involve signing bills into the law." In other words, legislating is not good for popularity.

MR. WOODWARD:That's true. But if you've -- you talk to economists,
CEOs
, the one theme that comes through all of this in terms of the
economy
, you need a plan.

MR. GREGORY:Right.

MR. WOODWARD:And you need a plan that's not one year or two years, you need a long range plan. And no politician in the modern era has figured out to present a 10-year plan that he or she could sell politically.

MR. GREGORY:Hm.

MR. WOODWARD:And -- because the problems in the
economy
are, are structural. They -- it's not something you can tinker with, it's something that -- you get a CEO on
Sodium Pentathol
here, truth serum, and say, you know, "How do you fix these things?" And they'll say, "Well, what's your 10-year plan, your eight-year plan?" And so he's
got to find a way
to make that politically salable. Whether he can, we'll see.

MS. GOODWIN:I think there's a way of having a bold vision. I mean, think about what
FDR
did in
1940
. We were still coming out of the depression, we had the war in
Europe
to worry about, but he mobilized the
economy
in a fantastic way. He brought in
CEOs
to run his production agencies. I think
Obama
could do something similar like that. He, he gave much bigger appreciation, deceleration
tax credits
to business, and they came through to produce the ships, the tanks, and the weapons. Right now, if he were to go for
alternative energy
in a bigger way than he has, if he would get these
CEOs
and say, "What kind of
tax credits
do you need to keep jobs here in this
country
?" there's a way of making
America
competitive in the world again, be number one economically.

MR. WOODWARD:But he had that war, and that was, you know, that was the engine that drove it economically.

MS. GOODWIN:Of
course
, it's easier -- but you can make things. You can't believe that that's all it has to be. I mean, you got to believe that, you know?

MR. WOODWARD:Maybe that's the answer.

MR. GREGORY:All right, let me get a break in here. We'll come back and talk specifically

about some of the challenges ahead:spending, the war in
Afghanistan
, and the
political
landscape which is already taking shape for
2012
. More from our
roundtable
right after this.

MR. GREGORY:We are back, joined again by our
politicalroundtable
.
And I
want to talk about some of the specific challenges the president faces. There are some tough issues out there. I think the first one is best summed up by
Merriam
and the
word of the year
for
2010
, we'll put it up on the screen. It is austerity. It is a noun, "enforced or extreme
economy
."
Tom Brokaw
, that's what
Washington
is, is going to be grappling with, which is
government
's got to shrink, it's got to spend less. It's how to go about doing it.

MR. BROKAW:Yeah. Well, you know, in fact, if you go across the
country
, you find a lot of families who are already doing that. More, more women are saying to me, "I buy an extra edition of the Sunday paper just to get the coupons.
And I
'm going -- I used to make fun of people in the grocery stores with coupons; I'm now clipping them myself."
On the other hand
, when they make a decision to close a
military base
in whatever
state
, a Republican or a
Democratic state
, or when they're going to shut down an agricultural substation, you're always going to get the pushback from the
special interest
. The community's going to say, "They can't do that. I mean, that's our whole
economy
." So this is going to be a very tricky piece.
Mitch McConnell
said the other day, the president's in for a big
fight
here. But the
Republicans
have got a lot of pressure on them as well because they made some big promises about how much they can cut spending. And we're not going to kick-start the
economy
just by cutting spending and by cutting
taxes
. There are, as I said a moment ago, some real structural issues that we have to deal with here. Innovation is way behind the curve about what's be -- about what's going on in
Vietnam
and
India
and
China
, and even in the
Middle East
, for that matter. And we're not addressing that by this
political rhetoric
.

MS. NOONAN:I think you

MR. GREGORY:Well, and that is -- I've asked this question,
Peggy
, to numerous guests over

the past several weeks:Do we have the balance right between austerity and what
Tom
mentioned, innovation?

MR. BROKAW:Yeah.

MR. GREGORY:Are we done investing in our
economy
to ultimately be competitive before we can deal with this long-term debt picture?

MS. NOONAN:Well, that's a huge one. I mean, that's going to be worked out over, over the next few years. I'm thinking as, as
Tom
was speaking, we have 40 million
Americans
on food stamps.

MR. BROKAW:Yeah.

MS. NOONAN:We have a lot of people in distress and a lot of people getting help from the
government
. It is true that we have to cut spending. I mean, everybody can make that speech. But it's going to be really difficult at the same time entrenched interests that are winding up costing a heck of a lot of money in American, such as, as municipal and
state
employee unions with pension benefits, etc. Every
state
is going bankrupt. They all have to look at the price of things. I don't know if austerity is really the right word.

MS. GOODWIN:I think -- it's an odd word.

MS. NOONAN:This is the -- yeah. This is some grinding of levers.

MS. GOODWIN:It is.
And I
think it -- in a certain sense, there's a difference -- austerity means sort of self-discipline. Shared sacrifice means you're doing something for a higher object. Like for example, during
World War II
, they, they called what we were wearing "austerity clothing." It meant trousers that didn't have cuffs anymore. No vests, it meant two-piece bathing suits to save cloth, so you didn't have a one-piece bathing suit. But you knew you were doing it...

MR. WOODWARD:That's where those came from.

MS. GOODWIN:Yeah! It was a good -- but you knew you were doing it for a
common cause
, and I think leadership strength has to be right now, if we're going to go through an austere period, to convince us that something more than just undoing the deficit, that we're investing in the future at the same time as we're being austere.

MR. WOODWARD:But, but...

MS. NOONAN:Which involves trust. Leaders you trust.

MS. GOODWIN:That's exactly right.

MS. NOONAN:Who, when they say, "Everybody's going to take a haircut, everybody's going to get -- have some difficulties but we can all get through it together, we're a great nation," that's the difficult part.

MR. WOODWARD:But, but there's all this talk about cutting spending, and then they don't do it. Of
course
, the
tax cut
deal, what, is going to add 800...

MR. BROKAW:A trillion dollars.

MR. WOODWARD:...almost $1 trillion to the deficit, and if you go back -- I happened to recently be reading
Ronald Reagan
's own autobiography, and in there he says -- and he's identified with somebody who tried to cut
government
-- and in it he in a very confessional way says, "One of my biggest disappointments as president, I was not able to do this in" -- he says, "I've let down the people on this issue." So if
Ronald Reagan
couldn't cut spending who's going to do it now?

MR. GREGORY:Well, but...

MS. NOONAN:He was able to cut the increase, the yearly increase, but he was never able to cut into this huge thing.

MR. WOODWARD:That's right
.

MR. GREGORY:But,
Tom
, what -- you guys -- there are cross-currents in the
Republican Party
over just how deeply they want to cut which programs. Are they going to really go after entitlements? Are they going to repeal
health care
? How does the president navigate this? Because the budget is the big
fight
of
2011
.

MR. BROKAW:Well, I think part of what he does is take a listen from
Bill Clinton
. Let them play their own hand for a while and stand back from it and see what happens within their
party
. Look, there's going to be more pressure coming
from the ground up
in the
Republican Party
than we can now fully anticipate in these
tea party
members who are coming in. And when they come to increase the debt limit in June or down, down the pike a little ways or shut down the
government
, the
tea party
people who have come in on this wave of populism within the
Republican Party
are going to push back very hard.
Peggy
was close witness to this, but I was reading as well some of the
Reagan
years, and people forget this, in
1982
he raised
taxes
after cutting them the year before. But they had wonderful language. They called the
tax cut
not a tax -- I mean, a tax increase, not a tax increase, they called it revenue enhancement.

MS. GOODWIN:Right.

MS. NOONAN:Ah,
those were the days
. Those were
the good old days
.

MR. BROKAW:And
President Reagan
also said, and only
Reagan
could have gotten away with this, he said -- when he signed the bill and addressed the
country
about what he was doing, he said, "This is really an extension of what we did a year ago when they cut
taxes
." To increase
taxes
was an extension of that, and somehow they were able to market that.

MR. WOODWARD:Well, and...

MR. GREGORY:Well, but -- go ahead.

MR. WOODWARD:...and we're going to have to raise
taxes
at some point here, or you don't address the deficit problem. And again, if you go to
Reagan
, the deal he made with
Tip O'Neill
, they doubled the
payroll tax
...

MS. GOODWIN:Right.

MR. BROKAW:Right.

MR. WOODWARD:...which is the most
regressive tax
in our system.

MR. GREGORY:But,
Peggy
, how do -- how do
Republicans
manage here?
John Boehner
is the speaker of the
House
. He's a familiar figure in the Republican range.
Mitch McConnell
, on the
Senate
side, he boasted about making the
Democrats
sweat tactically as we get
into the new
year. What's this dynamic going to be like?

MS. NOONAN:Well, it's interesting. They've been -- the
Republican Party
has been winning big consequential serious elections throughout '09 and '10. They just won the
House
, 66 seats, so it is very significant. But they all know the problem is entitlement spending, and if you are going to look at
where the money is
spent, you're going to have to decide how exactly do we go at this and how do we go at it, not only among the available remedies on spending, how do we take any one of those remedies without the
presidency
? Do you
know what I mean
? It'll be highly unusual for a
party
that is not holding the
presidency
, that is only holding the
House
, to make huge
change
here, and yet they have to move forward in a serious way or the people who elected them will be very angry with them.

MR. GREGORY:Bob Woodward
, another huge challenge is the war in
Afghanistan
.
2011
is the year when troops, American troops will start to come out, the president tells us. The vice president was on the
program
last week. I pressed him on this deadline point. And this is what he said about the endgame.

VICE PRES. JOE BIDEN:The recent
Lisbon
conference, the
NATO
conference, where we said we're starting this process just like we did in
Iraq
. We're starting it in July of
2011
, and we're going to be totally out of there
come hell or high water
by
2014
.

MR. GREGORY:2014
. Now
The Wall Street Journal
took this on in an editorial saying that

this was a mistake. And this is what they wrote in part:"Mr.
Biden
's glib rhetoric implying a lack of American
staying power
will in particular make it that much harder for
General Petraeus
to get the
support
of
Pakistan
's
military
in rooting out
Taliban
sanctuaries in
North Waziristan
and around
Quetta
." This is over the border from
Afghanistan
and the tribal areas. "The remarks also undermine months of
Administration
effort to downplay its original mistake of setting a
July 2011
deadline for beginning to withdraw
U.S. forces
.
The U.S.
and its allies went out of their way at the recent
NATO summit
in
Lisbon
to extend to
2014
the date when Afghan forces will take, 'full responsibility for security' in their
country
. But even full responsibility does not mean the Afghans won't need some foreign
military
help."

MR. WOODWARD:Does your head spin? Yes, it does because -- what they've told us is
the beginning of the end
of the war is July of next year and the
end of the war
is
2014
. What they haven't told us is how they're going to do it. And how it will work. And there still is this disconnect between
Obama
and his
White House
and the
military
about where this is going. And, you know, if you take that report that they issued after studying this, you know, really for months, they said, "Well, it -- we've made progress, but it's fragile and reversible." Now, if you've got ratings in, you know, and you're making progress but it's fragile and reversible -- you're smiling...

MR. GREGORY:Yeah.

MR. WOODWARD:...you know, what does that mean?

MR. GREGORY:Right.

MR. WOODWARD:That means you're in
Never Never Land
. That means we don't know.

MR. GREGORY:But can the president,
Doris
, make the case that we are still fighting an existential threat in
Afghanistan
? Does he have to do that in order to maintain some modicum of
support
?

MS. GOODWIN:Well, I think one of the things that hasn't happened yet, because he obviously hasn't made that case strong enough, six out of 10 people don't think this is a war worth fighting. In a democracy, you cannot bring soldiers into harm's way unless you're convinced the people that this is a war that we should be fighting. And the threat of
al-Qaedastill remains
the strongest question. If we can prevent and dismantle and disable them from getting back at us, then that's worth doing. But somehow that hasn't penetrated the
country
, and that's a failure of leadership until that happens.

MS. NOONAN:It is amazing to me that we are, what, nine years into, into these wars...

MR. BROKAW:Longest war
in
American history
.

MS. NOONAN:Oh my goodness, and we are not talking about it every day...

MS. GOODWIN:Right.

MS. NOONAN:...on the streets and in the cafe and over coffee.

MS. GOODWIN:It's terrible.

MS. NOONAN:It is amazing. It's just accepted as a fact that one doesn't comment on.

MR. BROKAW:That's because less than one percent of the
country
is fighting the war. I mean, and 99 percent of the
country
nothing is asked of us. I mean...

MS. GOODWIN:Right.

MS. NOONAN:Well, then we better get our
ROTC
back to
Harvard.

MS. GOODWIN:Right.

MR. BROKAW:And -- well, I don't think that will make the difference, in all due respect, because they have a choice of whether or not they want to join
ROTC
. They don't have to. It's not mandatory.

MS. NOONAN:Sure. Of
course
.

MR. BROKAW:And so it's
working class
--
Bob
and I have talked about this a lot --
working class
families primarily come from the smaller towns in
America
.

MS. NOONAN:It always is that.

MR. BROKAW:They come from a
military tradition
of joining. But it's an obligation of all of us as well as the
political
leadership of this
country
to make sure that it's on the table, not just in forums like this, but on a, on a regular basis. I also think that we're looking at this in old terms. We're looking at, where's the
victory
in
Afghanistan
?
Afghanistan
has had 2,000 years of foreign invaders who have crawled out of there without a
victory
in conventional terms. And it goes beyond the borders of
Afghanistan
. We're talking about Islamic rage. I've been in
Waziristan
and in the north in the
Khyber
region. These are two of the most hostile areas I have ever seen anywhere in the world. And as some of you know, I've been in a lot of bad places.

MR. WOODWARD:And the problem hasn't been defined with specificity that's necessary. The problem is, in these secret meetings last year,
Obama
said the poison is in
Pakistan
. The problem is in
Pakistan
. The sanctuaries are there and he decided secretly, "OK, these sanctuaries are unacceptable now."

MR. GREGORY:Let me get another break in here. We'll have just a couple of minutes left
on the other side
of this break, and we'll at least broach the topic that's already under way, which is, who are the
Republicans
going to nominate to challenge
President Obama
? Some final thoughts from our
roundtable
right after this.

MR. GREGORY:We are back with more from our
roundtable
, final moments.
Tom Brokaw
, you know, at this stage of the
2008
cycle, we were getting ready for the new year and some new announcements as to who was going to run for president.

MR. BROKAW:Right.

MR. GREGORY:So what are
Republicans
going to do?

MR. BROKAW:Well, I -- you know, who knows at this point,
David
. You've heard me say this a thousand times over, the
UFO
theory always holds, the unforeseen will occur. We don't know who they are at this point. It was just 15 months ago that the
tea party
was just a faint line on the
political
horizon in this
country
, and then suddenly it was this very powerful force. There are obviously a lot of
Republicans
in the
Senate
and in the statehouses around the
country
who see themselves in the
Oval Office
. I mean,
Tim Pawlenty
is running hard in
Minnesota
,
Sarah Palin
, obviously, is more than flirting with the idea. Now,
Haley Barbour
probably has banged himself up again a little bit in the last week or so with his comments about the
white citizens council
, to say nothing of people in the
United States Senate
, and
Mitt Romney
, the former governor of
Massachusetts
. So there's a lot of moving around going on out there.

MR. GREGORY:Well, what kind of candidate,
Peggy Noonan
, do you need to run as the
Republican Party
, to take on
Obama
? What's the theory of the case at this stage?

MS. NOONAN:Hm
. A big thing is how the tectonic plates
keep moving
in
American politics
.
Harrison Salisbury
once said -- a lifetime in journalism, he was asked, "What did you learn?" He said, "Expect the unexpected." If we've learned anything from the past decade, it's that anybody can arise from anywhere and become a leader.

MR. WOODWARD:Mm-hmm.

MS. NOONAN:Gosh, what do the, the
Republicans
need to beat
Obama
? A credible alternative, a serious man or woman, someone with experience and some weight and heft who can get through
Iowa
and
South Carolina
.

MR. WOODWARD:And so, not
Sarah Palin
, you're saying, is that right?

MS. NOONAN:Thank you,
Bob
, so much...

MR. WOODWARD:Yeah, yeah.

MS. NOONAN:...for clarifying that.

MR. WOODWARD:Yes.

MS. NOONAN:I got to tell you, I'm one of those who thinks
Palin
will not run, and I happen to think if she runs, it will not work. Her people love her,
support
her, watch her on
TV
, read her books, love to cheer her. They especially love to defend her when
people like us
criticize her. They will not vote...

MR. GREGORY:But it almost, as a matter of fact, I mean, she...

MS. NOONAN:I'm telling you, they will vote for her.

MR. GREGORY:...she could run without running. She could be a factor without running.

MS. NOONAN:They won't vote for her for president.

MR. GREGORY:Yeah.

MS. NOONAN:What I think she'll do is sit back. She's a realist, she'll know she's not going to -- this isn't going to work. And so she will sacrifice herself and
support
somebody else...

MR. GREGORY:Right.

MS. NOONAN:...so there'll be a
Palin
primary.

MR. GREGORY:But to the -- all right, against whom, against whom is the president vulnerable,
Doris
?

MS. GOODWIN:Well, I think somebody like a
Chris Christie
would be vulnerable for him because...

MR. GREGORY:Mm-hmm.
Governor of New Jersey
.

MS. GOODWIN:...because he's got...

MR. GREGORY:Who proclaimed on this
program
he's absolutely not running, no way.

MS. GOODWIN:Right. So then he won't be vulnerable, and that's it.

MR. GREGORY:But he won't rule it out four years ahead.

MS. NOONAN:But that kind of man.

MS. GOODWIN:No, but that -- that kind of -- that kind of
person
.

MR. WOODWARD:But, but he's the ultimate realist being made.

MR. GREGORY:Right.

MS. NOONAN:He is a practical man.

MS. GOODWIN:The kind of
person
who speaks straight, who has a fire in his belly, who you believe him, even if you don't agree with him, that kind of
person
, I think.

MR. WOODWARD:Who seems not to be a politician.

MS. NOONAN:Who seems to mean it.

MR. BROKAW:I think the other thing is that all of this has to be in the context of what are the conditions going to be in nine months from now.

MS. GOODWIN:Right, exactly. The
economy
's doing...

MR. BROKAW:Are we going to have another terrorist attack? Or if the
country
remains secure, do suddenly we catch fire in the
economy
in some fashion? For example, does something happen catastrophically in the
Middle East
that the president deals with either in utter failure or brilliantly. All those are the unknowns up against which we have to measure what the chances are, you know, and, and we still have a
long way to go
for that,
David
.

MR. GREGORY:Does the president make a fundamental shift,
Tom
, in this next year, in his leadership style and in his tonal approach to the
American people
that gives him a lift?

MR. BROKAW:He better. That's what I think.

MR. WOODWARD:Well, I remember years ago talking to
Obama
when he was in the
Senate
, and we were talking about
Illinois
, and he went around the
state
saying, "I have
support
here, I have
support
there, and I don't have
support
here."
And I
walked away realizing, "Oh, he's a politician. He knows where the votes are, and he's a realist." The question is going to be, can he grow and adapt to whatever those circumstances are, and we don't know.

MR. BROKAW:You know, the other thing is, here's what I think about, about
President Obama
. We'll see whether this painful loss in November and then the recovery that we're seeing in the short term, in terms of his
political
fortunes, convert him, in some fashion, to a new kind of
person
. I always said that
Bill Clinton
's career was helped immeasurably by his defeat when he first ran for re-
election
as governor of
Arkansas
. He learned a lot from that. He had to deal with a lot of people in
Arkansas
that were in the
business community
, and he also learned that he was vulnerable. By the time he got here, he'd been through that kind of an ordeal.
Ronald Reagan
had been governor of
California
for two terms before he got here. He'd been used to running a big
state
and dealing with
Jess Unruh
and the
Democrats
.
President Obama
has not been through that kind of baptism by fire. And, and I hope now that he's beginning to listen to some of the business leaders who've been rapping on his door for the last year saying, "We were for you. We have some things we think you ought to hear." And whether or not he's going to be receptive to them now about how to
change
the
economy
.

MR. GREGORY:I'm going to make that the last word. We will leave it there. Thank you all very much.
Happy new year
, and a
happy new year
to all of you at home. We'll be back next week. If it's Sunday, it's
MEET THE PRESS
.

PRES. BARACK OBAMA: I want to thank the Democrats and Republicans who put conviction ahead of politics to get this done together.

(End videotape)

MR. GREGORY: But after the break, major challenges await the president in the new year: high unemployment, the war in Afghanistan, a ballooning deficit, and Republican rule, at least in the House of Representatives. Where does the Obama team go from here? With us this morning, senior adviser Valerie Jarrett.

MR. GREGORY: The passage of healthcare reform, the shock of an oil disaster in the gulf, the rise of the tea party, and the ongoing struggles of millions of Americans looking for work in a still fragile economy. Where has it all left the country politically? And will it be possible for the two parties to find any common ground in 2010? With us, our political roundtable: NBC News special correspondent Tom Brokaw; historian and author Doris Kearns Goodwin, columnist for The Wall Street Journal Peggy Noonan, and Washington Post associate editor Bob Woodward.

Announcer: From NBC News in Washington, MEET THE PRESS with David Gregory.

MR. GREGORY: Good morning.

MR. DAVID GREGORY: Before departing to Hawaii to join his family for the Christmas holiday, the president picked up several major legislative victories during this lame duck session of Congress: the tax cut deal, the repeal of the ban on gays in the military, and the hard-fought
passage of the new START arms control treaty with Russia.

(Videotape, December 22, 2010)

PRES. OBAMA: A lot of folks in this town predicted that after the midterm elections, Washington would be headed for more partisanship and more gridlock. And, instead, this has been a season of progress for the American people.

(End videotape)

MR. GREGORY: And here to talk with us about the president's agenda heading into 2011, the top White House adviser and close friend of the president's Valerie Jarrett.

Happy holidays, Valerie. Welcome back to MEET THE PRESS.

MS. VALERIE JARRETT: Thank you, David, and same to you and your family, of course.

MR. GREGORY: Thank you.

"A season of progress," the president called it. And it was just November 3 the president was talking about a shellacking that he was responsible for in the midterm election. Then some unexpected victories in this lame duck session. What happened in that interim time, from the
president's point of view? Was there a course correction that he ushered in?

MS. JARRETT: Well, I think as the president said right after the election, what we heard and what the nation said during the election is, is that they really wanted to see Congress and the president and the administration in Washington working together. They wanted us to deliver
on behalf of the American people. And I think what we saw over the course of the last few weeks is just that. We made enormous progress, as you pointed out, from the taxes where, you know, everyone, when they get their next paycheck, instead of their taxes going up, they're going to go down with a payroll tax, with an earned income tax credit, with a child
care tax credit, with a credit so that we can afford to send children to college, and, and importantly, a credit so that companies will invest and they can take a hundred percent of their expenses now to create jobs for America. So that sends a very positive signal.

The START treaty, probably the president's single most important foreign policy accomplishment. In fact, the, the most successful treaty in the--in decades was just passed as well. And then you mentioned "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." Now we'll be able to have gays and lesbians serve their country proudly in the military. And it's a military that's based on
trust, and so now they'll be able to serve proudly and represent our country. These are all major accomplishments that were achieved on a bipartisan basis with Congress and the president, both sides of the aisle working together.

MR. GREGORY: You know, the vice president, who was on the program last week, responded to a question of mine about when people think about the president, do they--are they able to sort of pin him down? You know, what is he exactly? A liberal, moderate, a centrist or what? And he had, he had this response in part. I want to play it for you.

(Videotape, December 19, 2010)

VICE PRES. JOE BIDEN: What he is, is he is a progressive leader who, in fact, understands that politics is all in the art of the, the possible.

(End videotape)

MR. GREGORY: And that's--"the art of the possible," to a lot of observers, is a marked change from how he campaigned as somebody who was going to change Washington, change the way Washington operated. Has he made a shift in his own mind to say, "I've got to change tactics here, I've got to change strategy here in order to achieve some of the things that I want to achieve"?

MS. JARRETT: No, I don't think so. I think the president that we are seeing now is a--is the same person that I've known for over 20 years. When the president was in the state Senate, he had a reputation for being able to work very closely with people on the other side of the aisle and forge that compromise that's pragmatic. He never lets the perfect be the enemy of the good, and I think that that's his reputation. Early on in the administration I think the Republicans made a concerted decision to really oppose what we did. And I think what we saw after the midterm is a president who said, "I'm going to reach out more, I'm going to try
harder," and they reciprocated. And that's, I think, what the people want.

MR. GREGORY: And is that really the issue here? The tax deal sort of cleared out some of the underbrush here, and now there's more opportunity for real engagement, real agreement?

MS. JARRETT: Well, I hope so. I mean, I don't know about clearing out the underbrush. I think it's an example of what we can do when everybody says, "What's most important to me?" And what the president said was most important to him was not to raise taxes on the middle class, was to make sure that those who were unemployed have 13 months of benefits. Those are the ones who are going to go out, they're going to pay their rent, they're going to buy groceries, they're going to buy other household supplies, they're going to be able to afford Christmas presents for their children. That's going to grow the economy and create jobs. What was important to the Republicans was to have tax breaks for the very wealthy and the estate tax provisions. And so when you marry the two, you ended up with a package that was able to get the bipartisan support that we needed.

MR. GREGORY: But this was a candidate who wrote in one of the memoirs that extending Bush tax cuts for the wealthy was morally troubling. So a lot of the core supporters who came out in, in unprecedented numbers in 2008 see this as caving, or they see it as weakness. They don't see it as somebody who is a progressive, who believes that politics is the art of the possible.

MS. JARRETT: Well, I guess what I would say is what the president wakes up every morning focusing on is what's best for the American people, what's not--not what's in his short-term political calculus, but what's really important to the American people. And what he did not want to have happen on January 1 was to see our economy that, although it is improving, is still very fragile. And he did not want to have people see their taxes go up, and he knew that's what was going to happen. So he wasn't looking for a peer victory. He wasn't going to just fight just to fight and take that chance. And so, what he realized is that he had to be
pragmatic, but he was being pragmatic in order to deliver for the American people. And that's really what I think you have to focus your attention for, and that's what he views every decision he makes. He has two priorities--and the vice president said this, again, last week on
your show--grow our economy, create jobs; and keep America safe.

MR. GREGORY: But he...

MS. JARRETT: And so every decision he makes is measured against that test.

MR. GREGORY: But still, as president, you do have to fight some things. He talked about it after the midterms. You got to fight how things are done in Washington. He told Jon Stewart recently that "yes, we can" is still "yes, we can," but "yes, we can, but." I mean, is that now the story of the next year, that that Obama agenda has to be tempered by the realities of Washington?

MS. JARRETT: Well, we do have to accept the realities that the Republicans did win the House. And so they now have a responsibility to lead as well. And we can't ignore the realities of the membership and the makeup of Congress, and the fact that we are going to need bipartisan support to get things done. That is a reality. There are certain things the president won't compromise. So, for example, the Republicans wanted the high income tax breaks to be permanent. And what the president said is, "No, we can't afford it. In the new year, we're really going to have to tackle our deficit, and so we're not going to extend those tax breaks for the very wealthy indefinitely. We can't afford it, and it's going to be important that we control our deficit and, and we tighten our belts." So that's something he is willing to fight for, and we'll see in the next year and the year after that he's going to fight very hard when those
two-year extensions expire to cut off the income break for the very wealthy.

MR. GREGORY: You, you are, among other parts of your portfolio, someone who is a liaison with the business community in America from the White House for this president. The president's had a strained relationship with the business community, I don't have to tell you that. He's acknowledged it. He did so after the midterm election, talked about bankers as fat cats, and, and others that led business to really think that he was hostile toward them. What does this tax package do to get people back to work, and what is the new area of cooperation between the White House and the business community to get the economy moving?

MS. JARRETT: Well, let's put it in context and let's, let's keep in mind what was going on when the president took office. Our financial institutions were crumbling, on the break of disaster. Our economy was in a free fall. The stock market was crashing. People were seeing their life savings destroyed. Businesses were, were having to lay off people--in fact, the last six months of the prior administration we lost four million jobs. It was a, it was a period of turmoil. And the president had to take several bold and decisive steps, some of them
unpopular, to right our economy and get us on the right track.

Just last week, the president had a group of about 20 CEOs from around the country come in and talk about how can we grow the economy? How can we get some of the dollars that have been sitting on the balance sheet invested? And it was a very good session where we spent four and a half hours really talking about what we have in common. And I think what you're going to see going forward is an enormous amount of cooperation around exports, around free trade, making sure that the Korean Free Trade Agreement where the president lobbied very hard to open up export opportunities for U.S. companies gets passed through Congress; focusing on public education, making sure that our community colleges are training people in a way where there'll be real jobs at the end of the training. There's so many ways that businesses and, and the president are aligned right now. And what he said to them is, "Look, if you guys succeed, if you create jobs, if you invest in America, if we're able to help you
compete in a globally competitive marketplace, then the country wins." And that's what the president wants.

MR. GREGORY: The president spoke after the midterms about a difficulty that he has had connecting with the American people, living in the bubble of the White House and being in the bubble of the presidency. He talked about, as I said, after the midterm. Let me play a portion of what he said.

PRES. OBAMA: When you're in this place, it is hard not to seem removed, and one of the challenges that we've got to think about is, is, is how do I meet my responsibilities here in the White House, which require a lot of--lot of hours and a lot of work, but still, you know, have
that opportunity to engage with the American people on a, on a day-to-day basis and know--give, give them confidence that I'm listening to them.

(End videotape)

MR. GREGORY: You know him as well or better than anybody working in the White House.

MS. JARRETT: Yes.

MR. GREGORY: How does he do a better job of connecting with the American people when so many are hurting?

MS. JARRETT: Well, he often says that this is his biggest regret, is that when he took office, because of the crisis that was presented to him, he had to spend almost every waking hour in Washington focusing very hard on solving that crisis, and what he missed sorely was the engagement with the American people. He said it right before he left for vacation. He said, "When I get back, I really want to figure out a way where I can spend more time outside of Washington listening and learning and engaging with the American people." It's really what gives him his energy and his strength, and so we're determined in the new year to make sure that his schedule reflects that priority.

MR. GREGORY: We are in midst of a permanent campaign, and the, the campaign of 2012 is already upon us. And I found it interesting in one of the president's recent interviews, he said about a potential presidential aspirant, Sarah Palin, that he doesn't think about her. Do you think he should?

MS. JARRETT: Well, you know what I think? As the president of the United States, his obligation is to think about all of Americans every day. He has to wake up in the morning, he has to think about growing our economy, he has to think about keeping us safe. He needs to keep focused on the on the prize, and I believe...

MR. GREGORY: But he also thinks about political opponents.

MS. JARRETT: Well, but you know what, I think as president his job is really to focus first on that. And if he does that job well...

MS. JARRETT: ...if he looks out for America, if it's clear that he's doing everything he can to make sure that hard-working Americans who've lost their jobs can go back to work, and if he keeps America safe and he demonstrates that, 24/7, that's his priority, then I think the politics
will take care of itself.

MR. GREGORY: Do you think he should be paying to attention to her as a political threat?

MS. JARRETT: I think he shouldn't be distracted by what are perceived as threats. I mean, I think--I really go back to what I'm saying. Because he's the president of the United States, he's not out there running the way he was before when he was the U.S. senator, where you have to think about everybody in the field every second of the day. The American people expect him to lead. He's their president, he's everybody's president regardless of party affiliation. And that doesn't mean that at some point he's not going to get out there and, and launch a campaign. But the most important thing that he can do for the American people is
think of them every single day and let them guide his actions.

MR. GREGORY: Finally, your role in the White House is unique. I mean, for those of us who, who cover politics, who cover administrations, you have a lot of responsibility as an adviser, but you're also one of the president's closest friends and have helped to mentor him and develop him as a political figure. What role do you play for him in that way? What is unique about it, and how do you help strengthen him?

MS. JARRETT: Well, I think the president's lucky to be surrounded by a strong group, both within the White House as well as his Cabinet of people, who he trusts and who he relies on for advice. I think the fact that I'm a friend who's there, who's known him for a long time, provides me with the ability to be a sounding board in, in one way. But I think that what's important to know about the president is he really listens to a variety of different voices, a diversity of opinion, and that's what really gives him the energy and the ability to think creatively and innovatively. And when, when you see the president engage with a room full of people, he calls on not just the people he's known for 20 years, but the new stranger who's walked in the room who might be the junior person at the table, but who has a new idea for how we can grow our country and make it strong, how we can compete internationally.

He has an almost insatiable appetite for new ideas from wherever he goes. When he's walking along a rope line, oftentimes people will lean in and whisper suggestions to him, and he comes back and he tells his economic team--some of the smartest people in the country--"This is what I heard today. What do you think about this idea?" And I think that that's what you really want in a president, somebody who's innovative, who's creative, who's always looking for new ideas, and who surrounds himself with a divorce--diverse and robust group of people. And, and I consider privileged to be at his service.

MR. GREGORY: We will leave it there. Valerie Jarrett, thank you, as always.

MS. JARRETT: You're welcome.

MR. GREGORY: Up next, taking stock of 2010. Healthcare reform, the oil disaster in the gulf, the rise of the tea party and the ongoing economic crisis, where has it all left the country politically? Our roundtable weighs in: NBC's Tom Brokaw, historian and author Doris Kearns Goodwin, The Wall Street Journal's Peggy Noonan, and the Washington Post's Bob Woodward.

MR. GREGORY: Coming up, our roundtable examines where 2010 has left the country politically. And will it be possible for the two parties to find any common ground in 2011? After this brief commercial break.

(Announcements)

MR. DAVID GREGORY: And we are back, joined now by our special political roundtable: historian and author Doris Kearns Goodwin; Washington Post associate editor Bob Woodward; columnist for The Wall Street Journal, Peggy Noonan; and our own NBC News special correspondent, Tom Brokaw.

Welcome to all of you, happy holidays. There's so much to go through.

Tom Brokaw, you think about the lame duck session, how this year ends for President Obama, and all these people are talking about the "comeback kid" and "look what he accomplished." You know, on November 3 in the shellacking of the midterm it wasn't supposed to work out this way. What happened?

MR. TOM BROKAW: Well, let's not get ahead of ourselves here. I mean, we've got a long way to go and there are a lot of big problems that are still out there. But I do think that he's had a good month, obviously. I think that--and it's due in a large part to the fact that he seemed to
be in charge, that he was leading from the front and not from the back as the guy who was kind of consulting with everybody on the Hill before he made a decision. He stepped up, and the country was ready for this kind of action, and the Republicans, I think, to some degree, got caught a little bit flat-footed by his eagerness to get the deal done in the way that he did and the way that he stood down the Democrats who weren't happy about it.

MR. GREGORY: Well, let's pick up on that, Doris, because at the end of the week he signs a signature piece of legislation, and that is the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," which prohibited gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military. This was a way to mitigate some of the damage on the left, to say, "Look, this was a campaign promise. I got this done. You may not like that I'm dealing with the Republicans in other ways, but I got this done." And on this issue, the, the politics were too difficult for the Republicans to stay united in opposition.

MS. DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: Right. It's one of those moments when it was an idea whose time had come. And the gay movement deserves a lot of credit for making the whole way we think about gays different now. But it's very fortunate for Obama, I think, that that came at the same time as the tax cut, which a lot of the people on the left were upset about. But, you know, presidents in history are always upset about the people in their own party who criticize them. And Teddy Roosevelt used to say, "Oh, they're Tom Foolery guys. They're lunatic fringe." But on the other hand, they need them. They need them to push in from the outside in so that what they can get done is larger than it might otherwise be. So I
understand why he got irritated, but I think, on the other hand, it was great that he had that combination so he could say, "Yeah, this is--I did this, but look, on the other hand, I did the tax cut."

MR. WOODWARD: ...that will be noted for a long time and perhaps forever. At the same time, there, there's something about Obama that is not connecting with the people. And I was trying to think, you know, what is that? And somebody was telling me about this wake and gathering that Richard Holbrooke's widow, Kati, had in New York after he died. Holbrooke being the Afghan/Pakistan negotiator for Obama who died. And at this gathering, Bill Clinton walked in. And, of course, Clinton always takes over a room, and he put his arm around Kati, the widow, and started talking and saying that Richard Holbrooke had been somebody who always fought, who believed in peace. And somebody who was there told me, he said suddenly everyone in the room was involved in Bill Clinton's emotions. And that's what Obama has to do. He has to find a way to make these things personal, not abstract. He's so cerebral, he's so smart, he appears cool. And he's got to get in there and make those connections with, with the people in the unemployment line, the assembly line, in the mountains of Afghanistan.

MS. GOODWIN: You know, I agree with you. But the very steadiness that allowed him to come back from Scott Brown's victory, which seemed like he was dead in January, and then he brought health care...

MR. GREGORY: Who succeeded Ted Kennedy, of course.

MS. GOODWIN: Exactly. And now allowed him to come back from the shellacking in the midterm, that's a strength to neither be too high or too low, and to keep that steadiness. I'm sure at times you want him to yell, you want him to fight, you want him to show more emotion, but maybe those qualities don't often come together in the same person.

MR. WOODWARD: But as, as a manager, he did a great job. It's masterful. But as something connecting with the average voter, he's not yet there, and that's how you win.

MR. GREGORY: Peggy...

MS. PEGGY NOONAN: Can I throw in, too?

MR. WOODWARD: Yeah.

MS. NOONAN: I got--on an issue like--considering the president's position right now, an issue like "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is perfect. Here's why. It's a liberal issue, it's a left issue, fine. But it was in line with centrist thinking. The center supported the change. When a president of the left can make leftist moves with centrist support, he's going to be OK. Rightist president, the same thing. So always keep in, in mind the center. I would say also, Bob, as, as an extenuation to your remarks, I think the president has to regain his mystique, you know. The
presidency has a mystique, it has certain weight. It has a, a certain gravitational pull. I think the president walked into the White House with a certain mystique. I think he lost it in his first two years. He needs to gain it back. That's my read.

MR. GREGORY: Tom, I want to pull out a little bit farther, but before I do, I want to follow up on something specific about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." There's still a lot of questions about how this gets implemented, and then there's another question about military recruiting on college
campuses. My own wife, as you know, was part of the ROTC program at Princeton, as a lot of Americans were who were in the military and are no longer in the military. Is that the next step here, to take that on?

MR. BROKAW: Well, take it on is quite another question. The military has mixed feelings about whether they want to go back to Harvard, go back to Columbia, go back to the Ivy League schools. It's expensive.

MR. BROKAW: ROTC programs, and it's whether they get a big enough bang for their buck. Do they get enough kids who sign up for it at the elite institutions to go into a commissioned program of some kind? Or are they better off working at the land grant schools where they're going to get generally a greater response to it. So that's an issue. Now, the Ivy League and elite institutions are beginning to say, "We would welcome them back, we want to open that conversation again," because of the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." But you may find the military saying, you know, "I'm not sure that we need to go there because, frankly, it's
just not a happy hunting ground for us. We're not going to get that many people."

MR. WOODWARD: No, but it's important. I did naval ROTC in college back...

MR. BROKAW: Yeah.

MR. WOODWARD: ...in, you know, the Coolidge administration or whenever it was.

MR. BROKAW: Right.

MR. WOODWARD: And it is...

MR. BROKAW: Not Wilson.

MR. WOODWARD: It is important for the military to connect there with exactly the point you made recently...

MR. WOODWARD: ...about this disconnect between those who serve and people who kind of say, "Oh, no, not that, that's not for me." And one way to do that is to, to bring it, bring it--bring ROTC everywhere.

MR. BROKAW: Well, here's what I think, Bob. I've actually been thinking about this a fair amount, and I--what I would do is, if not do it campus by campus, if you go to Boston, for example, you could do an MIT/Harvard program and put a couple of the institutions together and have a central ROTC program drawing on all the institutions. If you do it by institution by institution, with the questions that the military already has about a lot of costs--you got to put officers in those programs and training programs--they may be better to do something that is more centralized.

MR. GREGORY: Let, let me, let me bring it back to some of the wider challenges that the president has faced this year. We can look at what's happened in the last couple of weeks, he had a strong finish, but this has been a tough year for the president, for Democrats. AP wrote about it, in summing it up, and started with the passage of healthcare reform. Quoting the president, "`This is what change looks like,' Obama said proudly, after the health care law passed.

"But the economic recovery was too slow. The oil gushed for too long. The health care laws was too complicated. The unemployment rate too high. The political discourse too raw. The tea party too loud. Americans were in a foul mood, and Democrats got the blame." That's
really the story of 2010.

MS. NOONAN: Well, it's not--the way that's written, it suggests it was a matter of fate. Oh, my goodness, decisions were made, they were not popular. You know, health care, two years into this drama, you can look at it, look at the numbers, and you realize people just don't love that. That, that was just the wrong...

MR. BROKAW: They don't understand it.

MS. GOODWIN: They don't understand it, yeah.

MR. GREGORY: Right.

MS. NOONAN: Well, when you're two years in and they still, everywhere across the country, are scratching their heads, that is almost the definition of a bad idea.

MR. GREGORY: But, Tom, do they not understand it, or do they understand too well...

MS. NOONAN: And the president gave his first 18 months to it.

MR. GREGORY: ...that in fact it's going to help poor people in a tight economy?

MR. BROKAW: Well, there are two different answers to that, David. I think that a lot of small businesses understand it very well, and they say, "It's going to cost us more money, and we're going to move our employees into the Medicaid program or something else for their--we're not going to be able to afford to cover them." People who are looking at it from the ground up are saying, "I don't get it." And it's 2,700 pages. Most of the major health institutions that I know in this country who are going to be responsible for the care are still trying to sort their
way through it. At the very highest levels, they don't quite understand how it's going to work.

MS. GOODWIN: You know, I think one of the...

MS. NOONAN: Just politically, it was a misjudgment.

MR. BROKAW: Right.

MS. GOODWIN: Well, I'm not sure it was a misjudgment, but I think...

MS. NOONAN: Just a waste of time and reputation.

MS. GOODWIN: You mean to even do it, you think it was? I, I don't agree with that.

MS. GOODWIN: But I think that what hasn't been done, you know, Bill Safire always used to say, when he gave a speech, tell them what you're going to say, then tell them--and then tell them what you told them. Somehow we never got straight what that, that healthcare bill was. A lot of people didn't understand what was in it, and that's a failure of the bully pulpit. Part of that is the rhetoric of the president. Part of it, it's really hard to get anything out to the country today because everything is so distracting.

MR. WOODWARD: I...

MS. GOODWIN: You give a speech on health care and the guy says, Joe Wilson says, "You lie," and that becomes the story.

MR. GREGORY: Right.

MR. WOODWARD: No, no, but I actually met somebody who read it, the whole thing, read it twice, and he, he confessed he didn't understand it.

MS. GOODWIN: Oh, that's a problem.

MR. WOODWARD: The complexity and...

MS. NOONAN: Yeah.

MR. WOODWARD: Now, one of the...

MS. NOONAN: The...(unintelligible)...a lot of it was just slapped in there. Nobody knows what's it all--interpretive.

MR. WOODWARD: I don't think the health care and, and where that's going or, you know, how it gets changed or implemented is a peril to the Obama presidency. I think there are other things, like the threat of terrorism, very, very real. And...

MR. BROKAW: Systemic unemployment. When they--when it goes up 2 point--when it goes up two-tenths of a point right before the election after they thought that they were on the right direction, that is a big signal. And my own guess is that it's probably a 12 or 13 percent of those people who are not looking for jobs anymore.

MS. GOODWIN: Right.

MR. GREGORY: But on Peggy's point, I think, whether it's about health care, the government stepped up, took some big whacks at policy, namely dealing with the economy, and a lot of people said, "Well, wait a minute, nothing's worked here. You know, you bailed out the banks--started under Bush, you continued it--the auto companies, you did health care, you did
the stimulus, and we're still in the same position. I still don't have any equity in my house anymore, and I can't find a job." That's a role of government issue.

MS. NOONAN: There's also this, this--growing from that, but part of what we're talking about is this--the biggest political change in the United States in my lifetime is the sense grown-ups have that their children will not have it better. It is a--we are a happy people. You can walk
along any street in America right now...

MR. GREGORY: Right.

MS. NOONAN: ...and you can see people just doing Christmas and the holidays, and it's wonderful. But there is deep down, on the third level of thought, a, a strain of pessimism that I've never seen before.

MR. GREGORY: Well, and, Peggy, look at this from our recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, people's views on the last--on this last decade, that it's the worst decade in history at 54 percentile.

MS. NOONAN: Well, part of that is big things happened at the beginning.

MR. BROKAW: But part of that because they're living through it.

MS. NOONAN: Well...

MR. BROKAW: Well, let me take them back to 1938, for example...

MS. NOONAN: Yeah, exactly.

MR. BROKAW: ...when the prospect of war and World War II, and the, and the recovery wasn't working as well as FDR had hoped it would in that year, and we still had bread lines in America, and the country was on its backside at that point.

MS. NOONAN: And we were hopeful.

MR. BROKAW: And, and how about the, how about the...

MS. NOONAN: Do you--it was dreadful.

MR. BROKAW: ...worst decade leading up to the Civil War, you know?

MS. GOODWIN: Yeah. And for those of us who are historians and who've lived in those other decades...

MS. GOODWIN: ...the 1860s, the 1930s, I'll still take this one, as troubling as it is.

MR. GREGORY: What about course correction, though? Because, Bob, you talked about connecting, and this issue of how the president positions himself to deal with the pessimism, to deal with systemic unemployment, the threat of terror. Politico wrote something interesting about "Obama 2.0: Reinventing the Presidency," and wrote--they wrote this: "`He needs to be CEO of America,' said former White House chief of staff John Podesta, an Obama sympathizer who ran his transition to power after the '08 election and is now urging him to dramatically refashion his presidency.

"The West Wing makeover, as Podesta and others see it, would involve Obama no longer being Velcroed to the Hill' and giving more attention to powers of the presidency that don't involve signing bills into the law." In other words, legislating is not good for popularity.

MR. WOODWARD: That's true. But if you've--you talk to economists, CEOs, the one theme that comes through all of this in terms of the economy, you need a plan.

MR. GREGORY: Right.

MR. WOODWARD: And you need a plan that's not one year or two years, you need a long range plan. And no politician in the modern era has figured out to present a 10-year plan that he or she could sell politically.

MR. GREGORY: Hm.

MR. WOODWARD: And--because the problems in the economy are, are structural. They--it's not something you can tinker with, it's something that--you get a CEO on Sodium Pentathol here, truth serum, and say, you know, "How do you fix these things?" And they'll say, "Well, what's your 10-year plan, your eight-year plan?" And so he's got to find a way to make that politically salable. Whether he can, we'll see.

MS. GOODWIN: I think there's a way of having a bold vision. I mean, think about what FDR did in 1940. We were still coming out of the depression, we had the war in Europe to worry about, but he mobilized the economy in a fantastic way. He brought in CEOs to run his production agencies. I think Obama could do something similar like that. He, he gave much bigger appreciation, deceleration tax credits to business, and they came through to produce the ships, the tanks, and the weapons. Right now, if he were to go for alternative energy in a bigger way than he has, if he would get these CEOs and say, "What kind of tax credits do you need to keep jobs here in this country?" there's a way of making America competitive in the world again, be number one economically.

MR. WOODWARD: But he had that war, and that was, you know, that was the engine that drove it economically.

MS. GOODWIN: Of course, it's easier--but you can make things. You can't believe that that's all it has to be. I mean, you got to believe that, you know?

MR. WOODWARD: Maybe that's the answer.

MR. GREGORY: All right, let me get a break in here. We'll come back and talk specifically about some of the challenges ahead: spending, the war in Afghanistan, and the political landscape which is already taking shape for 2012. More from our roundtable right after this.

(Announcements)

MR. GREGORY: We are back, joined again by our political roundtable. And I want to talk about some of the specific challenges the president faces. There are some tough issues out there. I think the first one is best summed up by Merriam and the word of the year for 2010, we'll put it up on the screen. It is austerity. It is a noun, "enforced or extreme economy." Tom Brokaw, that's what Washington is, is going to be grappling with, which is government's got to shrink, it's got to spend less. It's how to go about doing it.

MR. BROKAW: Yeah. Well, you know, in fact, if you go across the country, you find a lot of families who are already doing that. More, more women are saying to me, "I buy an extra edition of the Sunday paper just to get the coupons. And I'm going--I used to make fun of people in the grocery stores with coupons; I'm now clipping them myself."

On the other hand, when they make a decision to close a military base in whatever state, a Republican or a Democratic state, or when they're going to shut down an agricultural substation, you're always going to get the pushback from the special interest. The community's going to say, "They can't do that. I mean, that's our whole economy." So this is going to be a very tricky piece. Mitch McConnell said the other day, the president's in for a big fight here. But the Republicans have got a lot of pressure on them as well because they made some big promises about how much they can cut spending. And we're not going to kick-start the economy just by cutting spending and by cutting taxes. There are, as I said a moment ago, some real structural issues that we have to deal with here. Innovation is way behind the curve about what's be--about what's going on in Vietnam and India and China, and even in the Middle East, for that matter. And we're not addressing that by this political rhetoric.

MS. NOONAN: I think you

MR. GREGORY: Well, and that is--I've asked this question, Peggy, to numerous guests over the past several weeks: Do we have the balance right between austerity and what Tom mentioned, innovation?

MR. BROKAW: Yeah.

MR. GREGORY: Are we done investing in our economy to ultimately be competitive before we can deal with this long-term debt picture?

MS. NOONAN: Well, that's a huge one. I mean, that's going to be worked out over, over the next few years. I'm thinking as, as Tom was speaking, we have 40 million Americans on food stamps.

MR. BROKAW: Yeah.

MS. NOONAN: We have a lot of people in distress and a lot of people getting help from the government. It is true that we have to cut spending. I mean, everybody can make that speech. But it's going to be really difficult at the same time entrenched interests that are winding up costing a heck of a lot of money in America, such as, as municipal and state employee unions with pension benefits, etc. Every state is going bankrupt. They all have to look at the price of things. I don't know if austerity is really the right word.

MS. GOODWIN: I think--it's an odd word.

MS. NOONAN: This is the--yeah. This is some grinding of levers.

MS. GOODWIN: It is. And I think it--in a certain sense, there's a difference--austerity means sort of self-discipline. Shared sacrifice means you're doing something for a higher object. Like for example, during World War II, they, they called what we were wearing "austerity clothing." It meant trousers that didn't have cuffs anymore. No vests, it meant two-piece bathing suits to save cloth, so you didn't have a one-piece bathing suit. But you knew you were doing it...

MR. WOODWARD: That's where those came from.

MS. GOODWIN: Yeah! It was a good--but you knew you were doing it for a common cause, and I think leadership strength has to be right now, if we're going to go through an austere period, to convince us that something more than just undoing the deficit, that we're investing in the future at the same time as we're being austere.

MS. NOONAN: Who, when they say, "Everybody's going to take a haircut, everybody's going to get--have some difficulties but we can all get through it together, we're a great nation," that's the difficult part.

MR. WOODWARD: But, but there's all this talk about cutting spending, and then they don't do it. Of course, the tax cut deal, what, is going to add 800...

MR. GREGORY: A trillion dollars.

MR. WOODWARD: ...almost $1 trillion to the deficit, and if you go back--I happened to recently be reading Ronald Reagan's own autobiography, and in there he says--and he's identified with somebody who tried to cut government--and in it he in a very confessional way
says, "One of my biggest disappointments as president, I was not able to do this in"--he says, "I've let down the people on this issue." So if Ronald Reagan couldn't cut spending who's going to do it now?

MR. GREGORY: Well, but...

MS. NOONAN: He was able to cut the increase, the yearly increase, but he was never able to cut into this huge thing.

MR. WOODWARD: That's right.

MR. GREGORY: But, Tom, what--you guys--there are cross-currents in the Republican Party over just how deeply they want to cut which programs. Are they going to really go after entitlements? Are they going to repeal health care? How does the president navigate this? Because the budget is the big fight of 2011.

MR. BROKAW: Well, I think part of what he does is take a listen from Bill Clinton. Let them play their own hand for a while and stand back from it and see what happens within their party. Look, there's going to be more pressure coming from the ground up in the Republican Party than we can now fully anticipate in these tea party members who are coming in. And when they come to increase the debt limit in June or down, down the pike a little ways or shut down the government, the tea party people who have come in on this wave of populism within the Republican Party are going to push back very hard. Peggy was close witness to this, but I was reading as well some of the Reagan years, and people forget this, in 1982 he raised taxes after cutting them the year before. But they had wonderful language. They called the tax cut not a tax--I mean, a tax increase, not a tax increase, they called it revenue enhancement.

MR. BROKAW: And President Reagan also said, and only Reagan could have gotten away with this, he said--when he signed the bill and addressed the country about what he was doing, he said, "This is really an extension of what we did a year ago when they cut taxes." To increase taxes was an extension of that, and somehow they were able to market that.

MR. WOODWARD: Well, and...

MR. GREGORY: Well, but--go ahead.

MR. WOODWARD: ...and we're going to have to raise taxes at some point here, or you don't address the deficit problem. And again, if you go to Reagan, the deal he made with Tip O'Neill, they doubled the payroll tax...

MS. GOODWIN: Right.

MR. BROKAW: Right.

MR. WOODWARD: ...which is the most regressive tax in our system.

MR. GREGORY: But, Peggy, how do--how do Republicans manage here? John Boehner is the speaker of the House. He's a familiar figure in the Republican reins. Mitch McConnell, on the Senate side, he boasted about making the Democrats sweat tactically as we get into the new year. What's this dynamic going to be like?

MS. NOONAN: Well, it's interesting. They've been--the Republican Party has been winning big consequential serious elections throughout '09 and '10. They just won the House, 66 seats, so it is very significant. But they all know the problem is entitlement spending, and if you are going to look at where the money is spent, you're going to have to decide how exactly do we go at this and how do we go at it, not only among the available remedies on spending, how do we take any one of those remedies without the presidency? Do you know what I mean? It'll be highly unusual for a party that is not holding the presidency, that is only holding the House, to make huge change here, and yet they have to move forward in a serious way or the people who elected them will be very angry with them.

MR. GREGORY: Bob Woodward, another huge challenge is the war in Afghanistan. 2011 is the year when troops, American troops will start to come out, the president tells us. The vice president was on the program last week. I pressed him on this deadline point. And this is what he said about the endgame.

VICE PRES. JOE BIDEN: The recent Lisbon conference, the NATO conference, where we said we're starting this process just like we did in Iraq. We're starting it in July of 2011, and we're going to be totally out of there come hell or high water by 2014.

(End videotape)

MR. GREGORY: 2014. Now The Wall Street Journal took this on in an editorial saying that this was a mistake. And this is what they wrote in part: "Mr. Biden's glib rhetoric implying a lack of American staying power will in particular make it that much harder for General Petraeus to
get the support of Pakistan's military in rooting out Taliban sanctuaries in North Waziristan and around Quetta." This is over the border from Afghanistan and the tribal areas. "The remarks also undermine months of Administration effort to downplay its original mistake of setting a July
2011 deadline for beginning to withdraw U.S. forces. The U.S. and its allies went out of their way at the recent NATO summit in Lisbon to extend to 2014 the date when Afghan forces will take, `full responsibility for security' in their country. But even full responsibility does not mean the Afghans won't need some foreign military help."

MR. WOODWARD: Does your head spin? Yes, it does because--what they've told us is the beginning of the end of the war is July of next year and the end of the war is 2014. What they haven't told us is how they're going to do it. And how it will work. And there still is this disconnect between Obama and his White House and the military about where this is going. And, you know, if you take that report that they issued after studying this, you know, really for months, they said, "Well, it--we've made progress, but it's fragile and reversible." Now, if you've got ratings in, you know, and you're making progress but it's fragile and reversible--you're smiling...

MR. GREGORY: Yeah.

MR. WOODWARD: ...you know, what does that mean?

MR. GREGORY: Right.

MR. WOODWARD: That means you're in Never Never Land. That means we don't know.

MR. GREGORY: But can the president, Doris, make the case that we are still fighting an existential threat in Afghanistan? Does he have to do that in order to maintain some modicum of support?

MS. GOODWIN: Well, I think one of the things that hasn't happened yet, because he obviously hasn't made that case strong enough, six out of 10 people don't think this is a war worth fighting. In a democracy, you cannot bring soldiers into harm's way unless you've convinced the people that this is a war that we should be fighting. And the threat of al-Qaeda still remains the strongest question. If we can prevent and dismantle and disable them from getting back at us, then that's worth doing. But somehow that hasn't penetrated the country, and that's a failure of leadership until that happens.

MS. NOONAN: It is amazing to me that we are, what, nine years into, into these wars...

MR. BROKAW: And so it's working class--Bob and I have talked about this a lot--working class families primarily come from the smaller towns in America.

MS. NOONAN: It always is that.

MR. BROKAW: They come from a military tradition of joining. But it's an obligation of all of us as well as the political leadership of this country to make sure that it's on the table, not just in forums like this, but on a, on a regular basis. I also think that we're looking at this in old terms. We're looking at, where's the victory in Afghanistan? Afghanistan has had 2,000 years of foreign invaders who have crawled out of there without a victory in conventional terms. And it goes beyond the borders of Afghanistan. We're talking about Islamic rage. I've been in
Waziristan and in the north in the Khyber region. These are two of the most hostile areas I have ever seen anywhere in the world. And as some of you know, I've been in a lot of bad places.

MR. WOODWARD: And the problem hasn't been defined with specificity that's necessary. The problem is, in these secret meetings last year, Obama said the poison is in Pakistan. The problem is in Pakistan. The sanctuaries are there and he decided secretly, "OK, these sanctuaries are unacceptable now."

MR. GREGORY: Let me get another break in here. We'll have just a couple of minutes left on the other side of this break, and we'll at least broach the topic that's already under way, which is, who are the Republicans going to nominate to challenge President Obama? Some final
thoughts from our roundtable right after this.

(Announcements)

MR. GREGORY: We are back with more from our roundtable, final moments.

Tom Brokaw, you know, at this stage of the 2008 cycle, we were getting ready for the new year and some new announcements as to who was going to run for president.

MR. BROKAW: Well, I--you know, who knows at this point, David. You've heard me say this a thousand times over, the UFO theory always holds, the unforeseen will occur. We don't know who they are at this point. It was just 15 months ago that the tea party was just a faint line on the political horizon in this country, and then suddenly it was this very powerful force. There are obviously a lot of Republicans in the Senate and in the statehouses around the country who see themselves in the Oval Office. I mean, Tim Pawlenty is running hard in Minnesota, Sarah Palin, obviously, is more than flirting with the idea. Now, Haley Barbour probably has banged himself up again a little bit in the last week or so with his comments about the White Citizens Council, to say nothing of people in the United States Senate, and Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts. So there's a lot of moving around going on out there.

MR. GREGORY: Well, what kind of candidate, Peggy Noonan, do you need to run as the Republican Party, to take on Obama? What's the theory of the case at this stage?

MS. NOONAN: Hm. A big thing is how the tectonic plates keep moving in American politics. Harrison Salisbury once said--a lifetime in journalism, he was asked, "What did you learn?" He said, "Expect the unexpected." If we've learned anything from the past decade, it's that anybody can arise from anywhere and become a leader.

MR. WOODWARD: Mm-hmm.

MS. NOONAN: Gosh, what do the, the Republicans need to beat Obama? A credible alternative, a serious man or woman, someone with experience and some weight and heft who can get through Iowa and South Carolina.

MR. WOODWARD: And so, not Sarah Palin, you're saying, is that right?

MS. NOONAN: Thank you, Bob, so much...

MR. WOODWARD: Yeah, yeah.

MS. NOONAN: ...for clarifying that.

MR. WOODWARD: Yes.

MS. NOONAN: I got to tell you, I'm one of those who thinks Palin will not run, and I happen to think if she runs, it will not work. Her people love her, support her, watch her on TV, read her books, love to cheer her. They especially love to defend her when people like us criticize
her. They will not vote...

MR. BROKAW: I think the other thing is that all of this has to be in the context of what are the conditions going to be in nine months from now.

MS. GOODWIN: Right, exactly. The economy's doing...

MR. BROKAW: Are we going to have another terrorist attack? Or if the country remains secure, do suddenly we catch fire in the economy in some fashion? For example, does something happen catastrophically in the Middle East that the president deals with either in utter failure or brilliantly. All those are the unknowns up against which we have to measure what the chances are, you know, and, and we still have a long way to go for that, David.

MR. GREGORY: Does the president make a fundamental shift, Tom, in this next year, in his leadership style and in his tonal approach to the American people that gives him a lift?

MR. BROKAW: He better. That's what I think.

MR. WOODWARD: Well, I remember years ago talking to Obama when he was in the Senate, and we were talking about Illinois, and he went around the state saying, "I have support here, I have support there, and I don't have support here." And I walked away realizing, "Oh, he's a politician. He knows where the votes are, and he's a realist." The question is going to be, can he grow and adapt to whatever those circumstances are, and we don't know.

MR. BROKAW: You know, the other thing is, here's what I think about, about President Obama. We'll see whether this painful loss in November and then the recovery that we're seeing in the short term, in terms of his political fortunes, convert him, in some fashion, to a new kind of person. I always said that Bill Clinton's career was helped immeasurably by his defeat when he first ran for re-election as governor of Arkansas. He learned a lot from that. He had to deal with a lot of people in Arkansas that were in the business community, and he also learned that he was vulnerable. By the time he got here, he'd been through that kind of
an ordeal. Ronald Reagan had been governor of California for two terms before he got here. He'd been used to running a big state and dealing with Jess Unruh and the Democrats. President Obama has not been through that kind of baptism by fire. And, and I hope now that he's beginning to listen to some of the business leaders who've been rapping on his door for the last year saying, "We were for you. We have some things we think you ought to hear." And whether or not he's going to be receptive to them now about how to change the economy.

MR. GREGORY: I'm going to make that the last word. We will leave it there. Thank you all very much. Happy new year, and a happy new year to all of you at home.

MR. DAVID GREGORY: We'll be back next week. If it's Sunday, it's MEET THE PRESS.

First ‘Meet the Press’ photo

December 4, 1947: The earliest photograph in existence of the longest running television program in history. Sen. Robert Taft was the guest on "Meet the Press" that day, less than a month after the program debuted on NBC television at 8 p.m., November 6, 1947. James A. Farley, the former postmaster general and former Democratic National Committee chairman, was the guest on the first broadcast.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Billy Graham

March 6, 1955: Rev. Billy Graham’s first "Meet the Press" appearance. He tells panelist (and program co-founder) Lawrence Spivak "anything that makes any race feel inferior ... is not only un-American but un-Christian."
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Jackie Robinson

April 14, 1957: Jackie Robinson, the first man to break the racial barrier in Major League Baseball, also becomes the first athlete to appear on "Meet the Press." Robinson joins moderator Lawrence Spivak in a discussion about civil rights and Robinson’s work with the NAACP.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Eleanor Roosevelt

October 20, 1957: Former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt in one of her six "Meet the Press" appearances. Here she talks about her trip to the Soviet Union.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Robert Frost

December 28, 1958: Poet Robert Frost was introduced by moderator Ned Brooks as "the poet of all America. Indeed, it can be said that he is the poet of all mankind." Two years later, Congress awarded Robert Frost a gold medal in recognition of his poetry, saying it enriched the culture of the United States and the philosophy of the world.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Fidel Castro

April 19, 1959: Cuban Prime Minister Fidel Castro appears on "Meet the Press" during his first visit to the United States since the revolution. Castro was annoyed that permanent panelist and producer Lawrence Spivak would not allow him to smoke cigars in the studio.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Martin Luthur King Jr.

April 17, 1960: Civil Rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., pictured here in one of his five "Meet the Press" appearances.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

John F. Kennedy

October 16, 1960: After this interview, then-Senator John F. Kennedy calls Meet the Press the nation's "fifty-first state."
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Jimmy Hoffa

July 9, 1961:This first "Meet the Press" appearance by Teamster president Jimmy Hoffa had to be rescheduled several times due to Hoffa’s string of indictments. After the interview, Hoffa was furious about being asked whether his insistence on dealing only in cash and keeping few records gave the appearance of impropriety.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Edward Kennedy

March 11, 1962: Edward Kennedy’s first appearance on the program. The potential Senate candidate was coached by his older brother, President John F. Kennedy. President Kennedy and his aide Theodore Sorensen prepared "Teddy" for his “Meet the Press” debut by staging a run through of questions and answers in the Oval Office. On the day of the program, President Kennedy delayed his departure from Palm Beach in order to watch the show, but later told his brother that he was almost too nervous to watch.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Bob Dole

July 16, 1972: Bob Dole and "Meet the Press" moderator Lawrence Spivak prepare to discuss the break-in and bugging of the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate. Former Senator Dole holds the record for the most appearances on “Meet the Press” in a career that included service as a Congressman, Senator, RNC Chairman, vice presidential candidate, Senate Majority Leader and finally, Republican presidential nominee.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Prime Minister Wilson

September 19, 1965: "Meet the Press" conducts television’s very first live satellite interview. The guest is British Prime Minister Harold Wilson.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Ronald Reagan

September 11, 1966: Ronald Reagan, making his first bid for public office, appears on "Meet the Press" with his Democratic opponent for the governorship of California, the incumbent Gov. Edmund G. Brown. Reagan appeared on "Meet the Press" seven times -- all before he was elected president.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Robert Kennedy

March 17, 1968: Senator Robert F. Kennedy makes his ninth -- and final -- appearance on "Meet the Press" with Lawrence E. Spivak. Kennedy was assassinated in California less than 3 months later -- shortly after claiming victory in that state's Democratic presidential primary. He was 42 years old.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

John Kerry

April 18, 1971: John Kerry, then a former Navy Lieutenant, makes his first "Meet the Press" appearance as a spokesman for Vietnam Veterans Against the War. He has since appeared on the program as a U.S. Senator from Massachusetts 21 times.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Golda Meir

December 5, 1971: Golda Meir, prime minister of Israel, appears on “Meet the Press” with moderator Bill Monroe to discuss the continuing instability in the Middle East and the prospect of meeting and negotiating with Egypt’s leaders.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Prime Minister Gandhi

August 24, 1975: Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in one of her seven appearances on "Meet the Press" before her assassination in October 1984. After she was elected Prime Minister in 1966, Gandhi grew more concerned about her television image and contacted "Meet the Press" to request makeup samples used during her appearance on the program. The program’s makeup artist consulted her notes and sent Mrs. Gandhi a complete makeup set -- including sponges and instructions for application.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Gerald Ford

November 9, 1975: President Gerald Ford becomes the first sitting American president to appear on the program. President Ford accepted the invitation as a tribute to "Meet the Press" co-founder Lawrence Spivak, who was making his farewell appearance as moderator of the program.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Jimmy Carter

January 20, 1980: In one of the most dramatic newsbreaks in the history of "Meet the Press" President Jimmy Carter announces that the U.S. would boycott the Moscow Summer Olympics because of the presence of Soviet troops in Afghanistan. Despite initial outrage over Carter’s proposal, 60 nations eventually joined the boycott.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Richard Nixon

April 10, 1988: In his first Sunday interview in 20 years, Former President Richard Nixon reacts to a comment on "Meet the Press.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Tim Russert's first show

December 8, 1991: Tim Russert makes his debut as moderator of "Meet the Press." He has since become the longest-serving moderator in "Meet the Press" history. In the center of this photo is then-intern Betsy Fischer, who is now Executive Producer of the program.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Dan Quayle

September 20, 1992: "Meet the Press" permanently expands from a half-hour to a one hour program. Vice President Dan Quayle is the guest.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Shaheen and Whitman

February 2, 1997: The broadcast breaks television history as "Meet the Press" becomes the first network television program ever to broadcast live in digital high definition. Governors Jeanne Shaheen and Christie Todd Whitman share a light moment on the set that day.
(Charles Rex Arbogast / AP)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Bill Clinton

November 9, 1997: President Bill Clinton appears in studio on "Meet the Press" to mark the program’s 50th anniversary.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Al Gore

December 19, 1999: In a live Democratic presidential debate, Vice President Al Gore challenges former Sen. Bill Bradley to a "Meet the Press agreement" to have weekly debates in place of running political advertisements.
(Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Dick Cheney

September 16, 2001: Five days after the September 11th attacks, Vice President Dick Cheney joins moderator Tim Russert in the first live television interview ever broadcast from Camp David.
(Getty Images)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Senate Debate Series

September 22, 2002: "Meet the Press" kicks off its "Senate Debate Series" with the Colorado Senate race: Republican Incumbent Sen. Wayne Allard vs. Democratic Challenger Tom Strickland. At the end of the election cycle, the series of three senate debates was awarded the prestigious "USC Walter Cronkite Journalism Award" for "Excellence in Broadcast TV Political Journalism." The debate series continued in 2004 and 2006.
(Alex Wong / Getty Images for Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

George W. Bush

February 8, 2004: President George W. Bush kicks off his re-election campaign in an Oval Office interview with Tim Russert on "Meet the Press." Robert Novak went on to write about the interview, "no president ever before had been subjected to such tough questioning in the Oval Office."
(Getty Images for Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

James Carville

November 14, 2004: In another "Meet the Press" first, Democratic strategist James Carville cracks an egg on his forehead to demonstrate he's got "egg on his face" after his projected outcome of the U.S. presidential election was wrong. Carville predicted 52 percent of the vote for U.S. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), 47 percent for President George W. Bush and 1 percent for Ralph Nader.
(Getty Images for Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Jim Webb

November 19, 2006: The first edition of "Meet the Press" to be available via video netcast on the show’s Web site. U.S. Senator-elect Jim Webb (D-Va.) joins moderator Tim Russert on that program.
(Alex Wong / Getty Images for Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

June 15, 2008: The chair of late moderator Tim Russert sits empty on the set during the first MTP taping following Russert's death. He died June 13, 2008 of a heart attack while at the NBC News bureau in Washington. He was 58 years old.
(Alex Wong / Getty Images for Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

President-elect Obama

December 7, 2008: President-elect Barack Obama makes his first Sunday morning television appearance since winning the election to discuss the challenges facing this country and the upcoming transition of power.
(Scott Olson / Getty Images for Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

David Gregory

December 7, 2008: Interim moderator Tom Brokaw announces that David Gregory has been chosen as the new moderator of the show.
(Alex Wong / Getty Images for Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Rendell, Schwarzenegger & Bloomberg

March 22, 2009: Gov. Ed Rendell (D-Penn.), Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-Calif.) and NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg appeared exclusively on Meet the Press one day after meeting with President Obama to discuss the economy.
(Brendan Smialowski / Getty Images for Meet the Press)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Hillary Clinton

July 26, 2009: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appears for a full-hour on Meet the Press. It's her first appearance on the program since joining the Obama administration.
(William B. Plowman / NBC Universal)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

President Obama

September 20, 2009: President Barack Obama sits down with David Gregory at the White House for Obama's first MTP appearance since taking office.
(Pete Souza / The White House)
ShareBack to slideshow navigation

Editor's note:
This image contains graphic content that some viewers may find disturbing.