There are no contents that meet the filtering criteria.

Commission of Inquiry: Nepal 90

Commission of Inquiry: Commission of Inquiry to Locate the Persons Disappeared during the Panchayat PeriodDuration: 1990 - 1991Charter: Order of the Prime MinisterCommissioners: 4Report: Public report

Commission of Inquiry: Commission of Inquiry to Locate the Persons Disappeared during the Panchayat Period
Dates of Operation: 1990 – 1991

Background: In 1960 Nepal’s King Mahendra abolished the country’s limited democratic government and declared a system of “partyless” autocratic rule. The elected Prime Minister, Members of Parliament and political opponents were arrested by the military. This so called Panchayat (“Council”) system remained in place until 1990, when popular protests forced the King to restore multiparty system with parliamentary democracy. During the Panchayat period political parties were prohibited to carry out all forms of political activities. Repression of political opposition groups continued under the rule of Mahendra’s son, King Birendra, who took power in 1971.

The first post-Panchayat Prime Minister, Krishna Prasad Bhattarai, created the Commission of Inquiry to Locate the Persons Disappeared during the Panchayat Period in 1990. The commission was dissolved almost immediately thereafter due to controversy regarding the process of appointment of commission officials that entailed the government appointing them as per the 1962 Panchayat constitution. As a result of this controversy, two commissioners, who were representatives of Nepalese human rights groups, resigned. The government appointed a second commission with the same mandate, but through an acceptable process that considered the political changes in the country.

Charter: The Commission of Inquiry to Locate the Persons Disappeared during the Panchayat Period was established by executive order of the Prime Minister as per the decision of the Council of Ministers. (The cabinet decisions are not usually made public; therefore it is not publicly available).

Mandate: The Commission of Inquiry to Locate the Persons Disappeared during the Panchayat Period was created to examine allegations of human rights violations during the autocratic Panchayat system from 1961 to 1990, to investigate and identify the final places of detention of those who had disappeared, and to identify additional victims.

Commissioners and Structure: The Commission of Inquiry to Locate the Persons Disappeared during the Panchayat Period was comprised of four commissioners: Surya Bahadur Shakya (Chair), Prakash Kafle (Member), Basudev Dhungana (Member) and Dr. Sachche Kumar Pahadi (Member).

Report: The Commission of Inquiry to Locate the Persons Disappeared during the Panchayat Period concluded its work in 1991, and officially submitted their report to the government. The report was made public in 1994 as a result of pressure from civil society groups, although it is currently only available through the parliamentary secretariat and Nepal’s national library.

Findings:

Conclusions

The commission officially identified a total of 35 persons disappeared at the hands of the state, five of whom were killed, and the status of the remaining cases was declared “unknown”. The finding also provided the details of all eight persons arrested for allegedly detonating three bombs in Kathmandu in 1986 who subsequently disappeared.

Subsequent Developments:

Reforms

Despite the work of the commission, mass disappearances continued in Nepal, particularly during the Maoist “people’s war” from 1996 until 2006. The United Nations listed Nepal as the country with the most disappearances in 2003 - 2004. Since the 2006 signing of the peace agreement between the Maoists and the government, the number of disappearances has dramatically decreased. However, civil society groups and victims’ groups have continued to call for a thorough and independent investigation into the disappearances during the 10-year conflict.

Special Notes: The Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2006 calls for the creation of a truth and reconciliation commission as well as an investigative body dealing with disappearances. On June 1, 2007, the Supreme Court of Nepal ordered the Government of Nepal to establish a commission of inquiry to investigate enforced disappearances committed by the security forces and the Maoists during the conflict. In February 2009, the Government of Nepal introduced an ordinance to form the disappearance commission.

Related Publications

Nonformal dialogues offer complementary approaches to formal dialogues in national peacemaking efforts in contexts of conflict. As exemplified by the nonformal dialogues in Myanmar, Lebanon, and Nepal examined in this report, nonformal dialogues are able to...

In 2006, the government of Nepal and Maoist insurgents brokered the end of a ten-year civil war that had killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands. The ensuing Comprehensive Peace Agreement laid out a path to peace and ushered in a coalition government. Nepal’s people were eager to see the fighting end. Their political leaders, however...

Violent conflict, refugee flows, and internal displacements present international policymakers and practitioners today with unprecedented challenges. Tackling these problems requires not only signed peace agreements but also sustainable peace. It is not enough to bring armed actors to the negotiating table, however. To be effective, the peace process needs to be inclusive and participatory. But what constitutes inclusive participation, and how can peacemakers and peacebuilders achieve it in their own, very different societies? Drawing on discussions in a public forum held in early 2017, this Peace Brief looks at the elements of peacebuilding and explains how critical inclusive participation is to that process.

Governments and rebels alike are readily using – and often abusing – standard justice mechanisms like trials or amnesties during conflicts, even as part of their military strategy. And because they’re using the terminology of Western-style rule of law, the international community generally has failed to carefully examine these practices for their longer-term impact. New research, supported in part by a grant from the U.S. Institute of Peace, documents the trend and explores its potentially de...