tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3051717299463818920.post6615398051178591627..comments2018-02-22T03:45:00.231+08:00Comments on HKU Legal Scholarship Blog: PJ Yap and Eric Chan on Legislative Oaths and Judicial Intervention in Hong Kong (HKLJ)Simon NM Younghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11306243703903112785noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3051717299463818920.post-37050005577928830402017-06-06T17:18:11.015+08:002017-06-06T17:18:11.015+08:00Supposing a crime was committed on 1 Jan, and the...Supposing a crime was committed on 1 Jan, and the case was brought to court on 1 April and in due course the CFA sought an interpretation of the relevant BL article on 1 June, and an Interpretation was given on 1 Sept. If according to the authors there should not be any retrospective effect, it would imply that the Interpretation could not apply to this case which happened on 1 Jan. If so, itPhilip Tanghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12946996951239246329noreply@blogger.com