I can't explain or justify the spamming - or even the logic against NS - but I think I understand the underlying motivation.

I believe the word is deconstructionist. We ultimately know nothing, and the way to realize that is to challenge some of our most commonly accepted bodies of knowledge/belief and pick them apart. Our attempts at defining things in order to better understand the world and our place in it are irrelevant because all is meaningless. The only "truth" is that there is no truth - and by realizing that we can... I dunno, haven't gotten that far.

There's that, and he's probably also shamelessly trying to self-publicize.Quite tacky, and annoying, and there are waaaay better ways to try to get your ideas out there.

What did the parasitic Candiru fish say when it finally found a host? - - "Urethra!!"

Yeah, there is really no reason why we shouldnt all just curl up in a ball and die. But there's no reason to do that either, and no justifyable reason to challenge our reasonless lives. So the deconstructionalist ideas really contradict themselves.

All we end up having are the reasons which we create for ourselves, and what else do we need?

How is it that the meaning of life manages to weave its way into every topic?

A wise man once said to me:"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."