Somewhat inspired by this question about antiderivatives, I started to check whether or not that function had an elementary antiderivative. Then, after checking with Maxima, it struck me that, by simplifying the $\sec(x)$ and $\tan(x)$ terms using Taylor series, I could effectively solve the antiderivative of $\int {\sec\left(x\right)\tan\left(x\right) \over 3x + 5}\,{\rm d}x$.

Solving this, at origin 0 and with depth 8, I get the following expression.

However, and back when I had Calculus, I never remembered using a Taylor series in order to solve an antiderivative.

Besides the resulting antiderivative being an approximation that degrades the further away the function is from the Taylor origin (as a Taylor series has a sort of implied error), what other faults or errors might happen should one use this technique?

In a typical second-semester calculus course in the USA, integration using Taylor series appears at the end; it's sort of a pinnacle of the course, tying in integrals and infinite series.
–
Post No BullsDec 31 '13 at 6:42

Yeah, that was a fun one... I still haven't figured it out. Guess my next foray is going to be Taylor Series.
–
ChrisFeb 4 '14 at 19:18

1 Answer
1

There is nothing wrong with using Taylor's series for anti-derivative. In fact, the very first breakthrough in the computation of $\pi$ came when Gregory used your idea to get the anti-derivative for $\arctan$. Gauss did the same for $\arccos$. You are in good company!

I have to say I have yet to find anything about Gauss and $arccos$. This being said, a man by the name of Gregory Chudnovsky, together with his brother, developed a fast algorithm to calculate $\pi$. I'll keep this for a day or two, if no one gives another answer, I'll accept this.
–
Doktoro ReichardDec 28 '13 at 23:03