Saturday, October 1, 2011

Bidwai's Unadulterated Bullshit

By Ram Valmiki

There is a
particular pattern in the way Hate Engineers spread their ill-conceived
opinions and manufactured lies as real facts. They have mastered the art of
pushing across their propaganda as “analysis” or “news reporting”. Be it in
print media or in MSM, be it “sickular” activist champions of secularism or
panelists, all of them spare no effort in misguiding the gullible
audience/readers.

It is very
important for us to understand the modus-operandi of these Hate Engineers so as
to gauge the kind of damage they do to national interests. Since Narendra Modi is flavor
of the season and every “sickular” worth their salt has been writing on his
fast, I will attempt to breakdown the language of Hate Engineers by taking one
recent article of Praful Bidwai as an example.
I would like to inform the readers that this is the same way how the
Marxists/communist historians operate and misrepresent the historical events. Bidwai's rant is titled: 'Modi's nasty fast politics - Shifting the BJP rightwards'.

Praful Bidwai is
supposed to be political analyst/commentator and “peace activist”. It is
expected of him to provide just the analysis and not pass judgments. It is for
his readers to draw the conclusions and his duty to provide unbiased analysis.
But it is not surprising that so much like many other “sikculars”, he exhibits
intellectual dishonesty.

“Through his contrived sadbhavana
mission and outlandish three-day fast, Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra
'Milosevic' Modi staged a grotesquely fraudulent act in ugly political
theatre, which he hoped would catapult him to the apex of the Bharatiya
Janata Party and make him the topmost contender as the prime ministerial
nominee of the National Democratic Alliance”

The very first
line in his lengthy article starts by asserting that Modi is Indian version of
Milosevic. This only shows how
prejudiced Praful Bidwai is. Even before Praful starts analyzing the “fast”, he
passes on judgment that Modi is as dangerous as Milosevic for the country. Praful Bidwai seems to have great powers at
mind reading. He seems to know what is on Modi’s mind. Actually, it’s the fear of Modi gaining national acceptance and may be
even becoming the PM that forces the “sickulars” to try and derail something
that does not exist. Its Modi Phobia. Internet is abuzz with the growing
popularity of Modi at national level and he is no more limited to State of Gujarat
as “sickulars” want us to believe. Modi is already national leader and a
prospective PM candidate. That is hard to digest by Hate Engineers.

“Modi's shenanigans will certainly do
nothing to make him acceptable to the Muslims, who suffered Independent India's
worst state-organised butchery
under him in 2002. The presence of skull-capped men and burqa-clad women
at his fast means nothing.” The riot cases
are in court. Supreme Court constituted SIT did not find any evidence against
Modi. The case is back in trial court and Modi is not listed as accused. But
that does not mean anything to the Hate Engineers. They go ahead and make such
a bold statement as calling the riots as “sate-organized”. This is not
allegation, not even accusation but blatant way of presenting manufactured lie
as a FACT. As in my previous post have
stated, delinking Godhra with Gujarat riots would lead to wrong conclusions. It
is well known that riots were started as a reaction to Godhra carnage. The
local newspapers carried rumors and it ignited the suppressed anger. Does
Praful Bidwai suggest here that Modi planned the train burning? It does not
need great intelligence to imagine what the death toll would be if a state
actually planned and decided to something as heinous as riots. This also undermines the Indian Judicial
system.

For people who
are not aware, Gujarat has had history of riots before 2002. Based on Praful
Bidwai’s logic, we should blame all previous Congress governments for those
riots. The intended suggestion
of Praful Bidwai may be that the Muslims present at the fast are not real Muslims
and it shows in the way he likes to term them just as “skull-capped men and
burq-clad women”. Probably that’s why he sees no meaning it their presence. For Hate Engineers any Muslim not willing
to accept “victimhood” bestowed upon them by “sickulars” are not real Muslims.
Remember Vastanvi incident?

“Modi didn't express remorse at the
violence or signal moderation. He came through as an arrogant, duplicitous and
hubris-driven politician bent on further humiliating Muslims. His fast wasn't
about sadbhavana (goodwill or harmony), but about hyping himself up as a
politician” Modi was clear that his fast is about
“Sadhbhavana”. It is Hate Engineers who linked it to riots. Why would Modi
express remorse for something he has been saying he is not guilty of? Let the
courts decide. And I fail to understand
how the hell it becomes humiliating to Muslims if he goes on fast? This is the
way Hate Engineers try to create “victim” syndrome and suggest “humiliation”
and “insult” to Muslims. This is naked way of poisoning the Muslim readers with
perceived “insult”. I guess only Hate Engieers saw the arrogance
in Modi which does not surprise me anyways.

“He even belittled his former mentor L K
Advani by making him sit in a smaller chair than his own at the venue of the
fast, thus symbolically challenging conservative notions of hierarchy.”

Filled by hate towards Modi, Praful
Bidwai finds hidden meanings in travail things. Was not Modi the one who was
undertaking the fast and is he not the CM of the state? Why should Advani be
given bigger chair? Oh sorry! I understand Mr Praful Bidwai. May be it is difficult
for you to accept challenge to “conservative notions of hierarchy” due to your
loyalty to a dynastic political party.

“However, the Supreme Court by no means
exonerated Modi or the Special Investigation Team's report which holds that
there is no prosecutable evidence against him and 61 others named by
Jafri. Although the court sent the case to a trial court in Gujarat, it
directed it to examine that report, as well as the comments made on it by
amicus curiae (friend of the court) Raju Ramachandran, and to give the
petitioners a hearing.”

One should focus on the word
“prosecutable”. Praful Bidwai suggests though Modi is guilty, as per his
earlier assertions in the article, there are no “prosecutable” evidences. This
is an attempt to present Modi in media and public as “Guilty” and also part
acceptance that Modi may come out clean in courts. Hence an attempt to brush
aside any Judicial clean chit in future as just lack of “prosecutable”
evidences. We already know that former IPS officer is alleging that Gujarat
government destroyed the evidences.

“Of course, how the court acts within
Gujarat's vitiated political climate remains an open question, but it
cannot simply bury the case or accept a closure report without hearing the
petitioners, and summoning witnesses if necessary.” Here comes the expected. This is the attempt
to cast doubts on fairness of Trial Court should the court verdict go against
Hate Engineers expectations. This is also suggesting to the readers that
justice is doubtful in the state of Gujarat. Well hate mongers' definition of
justice is– Hang Modi.

“Meanwhile, Modi's credibility
has been further damaged by the disclosure by dancer-activist Mallika Sarabhai,
based on an affidavit filed by former top police official R B Sreekumar, that
his government tried to scuttle her writ petition for prosecuting him for the
violence by paying a Rs 10-lakh bribe to her lawyer. This showed that the Modi regime could
stoop to the rock bottom to suppress efforts to bring the culprits of the 2002
communal violence to book.”

This is half-truth.
Praful Bidwai posted his article on 23rd Sep 2011. But long before
that, the lawyers had called Mallika Sarabhai as liar and denied any bribe was
offered or taken. It serves good for Praful Bidwai not to mention this fact as
it would put question mark on the credibility of Sarabai. The fake petitions of
Teesta Stelvad have dented her
credibility but Praful Bidwai would not acknowledge the level his “Brigade
Brothers/Sisters” would stoop to in their hate towards Modi. Sarabhai had option to go to court and accuse
her lawyers. What stops her from taking the path of Judicial Process?

“Modi hasn't overcome even an iota of the stigma he earned by
presiding over the anti-Muslim pogrom of 2002. It is of course utterly shameful
that he hasn't been criminally prosecuted, and worse, even politically punished,
for his role in falsely communalising the Godhra train fire,and
systematically organising and colluding in the ensuing violence.” Praful Bidwai finally expresses his
frustration. All “sickulars” have their own definition of “Justice”. Anything
that does not satisfy their definition is by default wrong. “Sickulars” way of
thinking is “my way or highway”. If a muslim supports Modi, he is not a muslim.
If a court does not make Modi accused, court’s ability for fair trial is
doubtful. Modi does not lose the elections, people live in fear. They fail to
accept that the very facts that Modi has been elected by a democratic process by
the people of Gujrat is itself the evidence that people have accepted him and
rejected the lies spread by Hate Engineers. The fact that court has no
evidences to make Modi as accused is itself evidence that Hate Engineers stand
defeated.

But they will present it a shame and
instill doubts in Muslim readers that they have been denied Justice. These “sickulars” are greatest threat to
India. There cannot be any better example of
selective propagation of views as stated in my previous post other than the way
Praful Bidwai makes a statement -
falsely communalizing the Godhra train fire. Excuse me Mr Bidwai, it was not just
any other train fire. It was not accident. It was preplanned gruesome murder of
57 kar sevaks that included women and children. I suggest you update yourself
on the reports on Godhra carnage. Secondly, what do you mean by “falsely
communalizing?”. If a crowd of hundreds of Muslims with
previously stored petrol cans and weapons burning a train coach full of Hindu
kar sevaks is not communal, what else is? These are the same sikculars who call
genocide of Kashmiri pandits as freedom fight and not communal.

“Arguably, had the secular opposition, including the Congress's
Sonia Gandhi, the Communist parties' Harkrishan Singh Surjit, Jyoti Basu and A
B Bardhan, and centrist leaders like Lalu Prasad, Mulayam Singh Yadav and
others, insisted on its dismissal through a sustained agitation, the NDA might
have had no choice but to impose President's Rule.” Now we know what definition of
secularism Praful Bidwai follows. We call it in our language as just
appeasement politics.“His presence has been poisonous, not just in Gujarat. No one has
brought as much international disrepute to India. No other Indian chief
minister has been denied a visa in numerous countries for complicity in gross
human right violations.”

Praful Bidwai again indulges in half
truths.. But would Praful Bidwai care to tell the readers how much lobbying the
“sickulars” did? Would he please let the readers know how false stories were
planted in western media? While we are at it, does Praful Bidwai know that
recent report on Modi by USA think tank? They do not agree that Modi was
poisonous to Gujarat.

“The BJP could soon find that Modi, with his insufferable
arrogance, megalomania and obnoxious ultra-individualism, is more a liability
than an asset both for itself and its allies. It stands warned

Mr Praful Bidwai, I would like to thank
you for providing this article so that I could present the modus operandi of
Hate Engineers to spread half-truths, ill-conceived opinions as facts.The
time for all the “sickulars” and “Hate Engineers” to pack their bags and shut
down their shops is nearing as more and more people are realizing the crooked
ways they operate in. Before it’s too late and they lose any bit of credibility
left, they should express remorse. They stand warned.

5 comments
:

The same Praful Bidwai peddled extraordinary bullshit just before the Gujarat 2007 election results.

http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/dec/14bidwai.htm

Here are some quotes from that article on Rediff:

The tide seems to have turned. Today, the very same people will tell you, the BJP could lose the election. What seemed unthinkable only weeks ago could actually happen.

On December 23, we'll get to know how the BJP has fared. But it's worth noting that estimates by state civil servants and intelligence agencies of its likely tally vary from 70 to 80, way, way below its 2002 score of 127 seats. Even the state BJP's internal assessment is reportedly that it's sure to win only 63 seats. Optimistically, it could at best win another 15. But even then, it would still fall short of a majority.

Worse, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Bharatiya Kisan Sangh and other Sangh front organisations have decided not to help the BJP.

Finally, Modi has run a sectarian, foul and demagogic campaign, which used every conceivable low-level tactic. But he has still failed to attract large audiences.

Just one concern. Although finalizing the BJP-NDA candidate for PM's job is still far fetched, the MSM & Congress would spare not stone unturned to advertise, the internal power struggle between various possible BJP candidates in next 1-2 years. It is of utmost importance, that BJP-NDA do not fall prey to this media double game & stand united. Whether Modi becomes NDA's PM choice or not, the solidarity between its leaders is extremely important at least for public discourse.

The Gujarat riot when tried to make mountain out of mole can anyone explain if it was pioneering one or retaliation? If pioneering one it deserves to be condemned. If in retaliation then what to they expect the victims? Show their ASS for them to...?

When Modi's name is heard it is flustering the opponents but he is laid back."Strategy without tactics is sectarianism and tactics without strategy is opportunism" both are dangerous to the society. Corrupt cong adopts the former and communists adopt the latter.

But as far as Modi is concerned it is like "When the going gets tough, the tough get going" Therefore, no one need to plot the sin at his door as he stands aloft among our modern day politicians who loot the nation and its opulence with impunity

Hey Ravinar, Advani Ji in his blog has mentioned that Narendra Modi Ji did not apply for the Visa, so Where is this cancellation of his visa comment stand?http://blog.lkadvani.in/blog-in-english/us-congress-report-praises-corruption-free-gujarat

BIDWAI says: "Although the court sent the case to a trial court in Gujarat, it directed it to examine that report, as well as the comments made on it by amicus curiae (friend of the court) Raju Ramachandran, and to give the petitioners a hearing.”

Very crafty way of misleading. The SUPREME COURT has VERY CLEARLY left it to the DISCRETION of the SIT to obtain the the report of Amicus before forwarding its final report to the trial court. There is NO MANDATORY DIRECTION by the Court to obtain the Amicus report.

Secondly, whenever a trial court decides against chargesheeting any person(s) mentioned in the final report of the investigative agency, it is a matter of ordinary criminal procedure for the trial court to give the complainant a hearing. There is nothing EXTRAORDINARY in this direction of the Supreme Court. It is a norm with every criminal trial. The Supreme Court has only mentioned it in their order by way of abundant caution.

Bidwai would like us to think that Supreme Court has made unusual and extraordinary observations regarding this case and regarding Modi. In reality, it is a perfunctory verdict following well-established criminal procedural norms. Don't let anybody convey the idea that it somehow passes strictures against Modi or the SIT.

Comments are welcome and are not moderated so as to allow free speech. However, comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory or slanderous may be deleted. Comments disclosing personal information of individuals/entities will be deleted.Comments appearing here do not imply endorsement by author of this blog.