Anti-white sentiments such as these have been more than 200 years in the making.

So is the SPLC saying that because people with a certain skin color act a certain way, it is then justifiable or at the least understandable to treat other completely unrelated individuals a certain way for the sole reason that they share the same skin color? And this from a website claiming to be "anti-racist"?

Yet apparently when a white person acknowledges that disproportionate levels of crime are committed by Africans and Hispanics this would be "racist"?

Can someone please explain this double standard to me?

Quote:

"That trauma is qualitatively different than other ethnic groups in America. It's more akin to American Indians" because Hawaiians had their homeland invaded, were exposed to diseases for which they had no immunity, and had an alien culture forced upon them, he says.

Wait a minute, I thought the SPLC was 100% in favor of open borders? In fact, doesn't the SPLC brandish anyone who opposes open borders as being a racist? Oh right, apparently they do:

No on will be able to explain this to you because it makes no sense. It's a double standard that they had to be round about and try to make everyone happy with, that's why there's so many contradictions there.

No on will be able to explain this to you because it makes no sense. It's a double standard that they had to be round about and try to make everyone happy with, that's why there's so many contradictions there.

Thanks, but I really need someone to explain this to me. When explaining black crime, a leftist will tell me that the history of slavery is the cause of that. When I come back and bring up other historically oppressed groups such as the Russians in the Soviet Union, the Japanese in North America during WWII, or any other relatively recent example, all of a sudden the cognitive dissonance seems to kick in for a few seconds until they make up some totally nonsensical excuse to justify it and stick to it. Then they make it out to be that I am the only one who has it wrong and they are right.

Am I insane and the rest of the world is sane? Is what I consider to be logical in fact nothing of the sort? Are double standards somehow correct?