I think it might be a good idea to have a separate site for NSFW content, only because the political content would not be taken as seriously because of its proximity to what some might object to. I think most of your audience wouldn’t mind, but someone looking into your work for job purposes might not dig it. This is all speculation, of course.

(“can’t unsee”. I had to laugh at how you phrased that.)
As a self-identified prude I’d say it’s probably wiser to have a separate section.
But then again, idk, I prefer to decide what is inappropriate for myself. Even my hubby and I don’t agree on some individual images or contexts. More skin does not necessarily equal inappropriate and I think that’s a real problem with American perceptions.
Course my office is in the wilderness so I don’t have a boss looking over my shoulder or legalistic policies to deal with. Students may have restrictions as well. Strictly in regards to that, having a separate section makes more sense and is respectful.
However, by labeling something NSFW you may inadvertently shadow some of your work with a more “porny” feel so it isn’t taken as seriously. But then, perhaps some of your work is meant to be that way.
So there ya go – I guess I have no helpful hand raising but I muddied the waters nicely for you instead. ‘Welcome

My own taste is mixed; I have seen nothing that offended me (and much that might have offended someone, especially those allergic to firearms and/or skin.) That said, it might be better for others — and perhaps you — to have them more separate.

I enjoy your photography, and sense of humor. However it works out easiest for you is fine with me, though I do have the advantage of not being in an office environment anymore (there is no NSFW when you don’t work). 🙂

I think the way it works at present is fine for your audience. I suspect most of the people who keep an eye on your content are cultural libertarians- not full on libertine neurodiversity and polyamory advocates, but the sort of people who maybe used to follow Adam Kokesh but have grown up. They aren’t going to be bothered by this stuff.

I doubt that taking the newds off the main blog would draw in many kosher conservatives, nor my kind of people- who are more inspired by pictures of constitutional self-defence in action, like the Algiers Point militia.

I am more and more concerned with the efforts by Facebook, Microsoft, and Googler to take over the world. They are in 2016 competing to be the Big Brother imaged in 1984.
That said, I have a link to your site, and visit as appropriate.
Images of people are the last remnamt of humanity, and they are determined to take that away.
Post all on your site. Be RealBook instead of Zuckerfake.
~ Don McGaffey
Facebook blocked Civil RightsKeeper.

Thanks for the opportunity to offer an opinion on what to do regarding what some call NSFW images. I have noticed that you frequently post imagery of the young engaged in the shooting discipline and you have emphasized the guidance of adults who promote safety. All of these things are valuable and you are to be commended for those works. Some adults, Christian adults would not find NSFW images suitable for themselves nor their young and likely besides being offended would not make the effort to screen the site content for their young, a group that is the future of firearms ownership. I have co-workers who read movie reviews at a Christian review site before allowing their kids to go view a particular movie. I am likely a minority here but my input is this: Remove NSFW content from this site so that visitors of all ages and faiths can come here and benefit.