"The
militia is the natural defense of a free country against sudden foreign
invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpation of power by
rulers. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been
considered, as the palladium of the liberties of the republic; since it
offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power
of rulers; and will generally ... enable the people to resist and triumph
over them." Joseph Story, Supreme Court Justice, Commentaries on
the Constitution of the United States, p. 3:746-7, 1833

How
many billions of words have been written about our individual right to
own and bear arms? Ten thousand plus are in the links section below; my
CD also has a huge section on this unalienable right given to us from
the blood of patriots. The Internet has thousands of pages devoted to
the Second Amendment and its twenty-seven words: A well regulated Militia,
being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people
to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

How
many court cases have been fought over the past fifty years to stop "reasonable"
gun laws passed which restrict our individual right to own and bear arms?
Law libraries are filled to the ceiling just on Second Amendment cases
alone. DC v Heller
is the latest with the Bush Administration submitting a brief that should
stun any gun owner who voted for Bush:

"Since
"unrestricted" private ownership of guns clearly threatens the public
safety, the 2nd Amendment can be interpreted to allow a variety of gun
restrictions, according to the Bush administration. The argument was delivered
by U.S. Solicitor General Paul D. Clement in a brief filed with the U.S.
Supreme Court in the ongoing arguments over the legality of a District
of Columbia ban on handguns in homes, according to a report from the Los
Angeles Times. Clement suggested that gun rights are limited and subject
to "reasonable regulation" and said all federal limits on guns should
be upheld."

Clement
is a fool and a tool of tyrants.

In the
past ten days, we've had a string of shootings on school campuses, the
latest being one more legally drugged American. Another "gun free" zone,
the meaning of which Dr. Edwin Vieira has crystallized in his scholarly
columns and why they contribute to these massacres.

Old
timers like yours truly have been aware of the Department
of State Publication 7277 for decades. The communist UN (United Nations),
a privately
run operation that has never kept peace anywhere in the world, has
been unabashed in their efforts to get your guns. Banks and retailers
over the years have attempted to curtail the legal commerce of guns.
Here's the most recent: Citibank
Refusing to Process Firearms Related Transactions: "Charlie Crawford,
president of CDNN Sports Inc., explained: "We were contacted recently
by First Data/Citi Merchant Services by a June Rivera-Mantilla stating
that we were terminated and funds were being seized for selling firearms
in a non-face-to-face transaction. Although perfectly legal, we were also
informed that no transactions would be processed in the future, even for
non-firearms."

If you
really believe in your God-given right to own and bear arms, stop doing
any business with Citibank and tell them why. If you continue to do
business with your enemy, you enrich them financially and validate their
corporate positions, i.e., denying a legal business the right to conduct
its operations. How many more "alerts" are you going to read and then
just go back to whatever you were doing? Reading educates, but its action
that will save this republic. And, by the way, how many gun owners are
going to vote for Marxist Hillary Clinton or
Barack
Obama? No one can question Clinton's hatred of the U.S. Constitution,
but how about the newly minted 'Messiah' now causing his cult-like followers
to swoon? These are accurate examples of Obama's ignorance regarding the
Second Amendment:

The
"us" vs "them" mentality of law enforcement continues to spread its malignant
stench, i.e., "Homegrown
Terrorists" David Codrea: ""If you encounter any of the following,
call the Joint Terrorism Task Force," read the flyer from the FBI's Phoenix
Division. "[T]he purpose of this information sheet is to assist uniformed
patrol officers in identifying potential domestic terrorism." So what
would a cop on the street look out for? "Defenders of the US Constitution
against federal government and the UN (Super Patriots)," read the very
first point in the very first category, "Right Wing Extremists."

These
detestable vermin in the U.S, Congress who wouldn't know what the U.S.
Constitution said if James Madison stood right in front of them and cited
it word for word, engaged in more chicanery a few months ago. GOA
explains it this way:

"It was December
19. Most Congressmen had left town and were either at the airport or
in the air returning home. They weren't in Washington, DC, because their
party leadership had told them that all the major votes were over...
that the only legislative business left related to non-controversial
issues, such as when Congress would return from Christmas break, etc.
But it was then, with most of the Congress gone, that the House and
Senate passed the Veterans Disarmament Act without a recorded vote."

"What
does the bill do in general? It would be a mistake to under-react -- or
over-react -- to the passage of the Veterans Disarmament Act. On the bad
side, this bill statutorily validates BATF regulations which could potentially
disarm millions of Americans. This is a VERY DANGEROUS turn of events
which will have huge ramifications over the next several decades. The
extent to which its unconstitutional potential will be realized will be
clear only over time -- and perhaps a long time -- and will depend on
whether pro-gunners or anti-gunners are in power. For example, it took
a full thirty years for language in the 1968 Gun Control Act to be used
to disarm veterans."

Disarm
our veterans? You know, our precious freedom fighters who take an oath
to protect this republic and our constitution with the potential of making
the ultimate sacrifice: their lives. The same military personnel sent
to fight these endless and shameful wars for the bankers and world elitists,
not with bows and arrows, but with guns. If Patrick Henry were alive today,
he would have taken Rep. Carolyn McCarthy aside and told her to shut her
stupid mouth and kicked the crap out of the gutless Chuck Schumer for
this junk law. Brassiere Brigade leader, Nancy Pelosi
and sissy "leader" Harry Reid, bear a major responsibility for allowing
this dung to even come up for a vote. RINOs House Minority "Leader" John
Boehner and Senate Minority "Leader" Mitch McConnell should not be left
out for violating their oath of office and slapping the faces of our veterans.

Once
again, I wonder why the 80 MILLION plus gun owners in this country seem
to want to continue fighting skirmishes instead of winning the war? I've
asked this question before, only to see my mail box fill up with more
dire warnings about a new gun bill and confiscation. Congress and activist
judges on the bench have shown their true colors, so don't look to them.
You have to fight to stop this constant war over the Second Amendment
and that doesn't mean more of the same. If you keep doing the same
thing and expect different results, it's called a form of insanity.

"Where
"gun controllers" cannot prohibit the private possession of firearms altogether
by smearing them with bad names, they work to proscribe possession in
certain places by playing on the feel good modifier "gun free"--as in
"gun-free school", "gun-free airport", "gun-free streets", or simply "gun-free
zone". If generalized (which is the "gun controllers'" objective), this
tactic would gradually prohibit the private possession of firearms except
within one's own home--and probably not allow it even there, given that
slogans such as "gun-free home" or "gun-free family" doubtlessly will
appeal strongly to those people who pay attention to sounds rather than
substance.

"One
can hope that even the dullest American will recognize why, in the real
world, where actions have consequences and effects follow from causes,
any "gun-free zone" is actually a "self-defense prohibited zone" and a
"free-fire zone for criminals and psychopaths", advertised and guaranteed
as such to the predators under color of law. It amounts to locking
the visitors at the zoo inside the cages with hungry lions and tigers,
jackals and hyenas, at feeding time. In short, it is politically mandated
and imposed victimization of innocent citizens, through public officials'
intentional aiding and abetting of criminal activities. (Another egregious
case of contemporary politicians' penchant for using the law to break
the law.)

"As
commonsensical as this insight is, though, it would be unnecessary if
many advocates of "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" did
not concede that the Second Amendment can or even should be construed
without reference to "[a] well regulated Militia", and therefore without
reference to the actual history and principles of the pre-constitutional
American Militia. For, under all of the pre-constitutional Militia Acts,
individuals kept the latest military firearms, ammunition, and accouterments
of their day in their own homes, in their private possession, at all times.
No public official or "gun-control" group would ever have dared to propose
anything as ridiculous as a ban on "assault weapons" or "sniper rifles",
when the muskets and rifles the laws required individuals to possess were
the premier "assault weapons" and "sniper rifles" of that era. And no
Militia Act ever created any "zone" where people who were required to
possess arms could not go about armed. To the contrary, in the days of
greatest danger Militia Acts specifically designated even such places
as town meetings and houses of worship to which individuals were required
to bring their firearms in order to provide security for the community[2]--a
practice which, if followed in today's governmental schools (the most
extensive and indefensible of America's "gun-free zones"), probably could
have stopped in their tracks the deplorable shooting rampages of recent
years.

"Thus,
no free American needs any special reason, excuse, license, or permission
to possess firearms or to go armed at home or in most public or private
places, because these are not only constitutional rights, but also constitutional
duties.[3]"

For
years I have been asking gun owners in this country: When will enough
be enough? When Edwin's latest, thoroughly researched book on constitutional
homeland security came out, I urged every gun owner to get a copy and
get in the face of your state lawmakers. True to form (let someone else
do it), many men have sent me email over the past year telling me they
really can't be part of the organized Militia of the Several States because
they don't have time. Good thing Americans like Patrick Henry didn't have
the same limp excuse.

In Edwin's
latest scholarly work, 'Constitutional
Homeland Security: A Call for Americans to Revitalize the Militia
of the Several States. Volume I, The Nation in Arms,' he explains
this critical issue and gun owners need to read it. They need to act on
it because I'm telling you as sure as the sun shines, at some point there
will be violence in this country from the militant illegals that are here,
locked and loaded. If you think help will come from local law enforcement,
remember
Katrina. For the ninnies out there who think law enforcement is there
to save your bacon, you are dead wrong. The police are under no obligation
to respond to your calls for help; the courts have consistently ruled
in favor of the police. How about the Sacramento Bee newspaper
spread (1997) detailing the use of our military against civilians? Click
here and read it. It's coming and the green light was given under
a couple pieces of legislation that are so totalitarian in nature, you
should be very worried. But, this November, you watch, Republicans will
vote the same incumbents back into office who voted for this draconian
legislation! Read
this column and get off the dime because our survival depends on what
we do this year.

Are
gun owners going to continue fighting these endless bills coming out of
their state legislatures and Congress or will they ban together once and
for all and do what has to be done as Edwin outlines in Vol. I of Constitutional
Homeland Security? A win in DC v Keller won't stop the gun grabbers.
Time is critical. Many state legislatures go out of session in a few months.
We are being attacked every day in this country by the powerful forces
who own our politicians and do their bidding. The ultimate goal is totalitarian
government and that means a completely disarmed populace. The Second Amendment
is the most important
of all the amendments. Will you step up to the plate and organize
your fellow gun owners and start the process of demanding your state lawmakers
get the legislation through your state house to revitalize
the militia or keep fighting skirmishes?

Devvy Kidd authored
the booklets, Why
A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty;
2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country,
ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy belongs
to no organization.

She left the Republican
Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't
left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes
in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Her web site
(www.devvy.com) contains a tremendous
amount of information, solutions and a vast Reading Room.

In
the past ten days, we've had a string of shootings on school campuses,
the latest being one more legally drugged American. Another "gun free"
zone, the meaning of which Dr. Edwin Vieira has crystallized in his scholarly
columns and why they contribute to these massacres.