Successful Scenario
Due to Golden State and Philadelphia being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Golden State and Philadelphia had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

--------- What do you think? ---------------- *** 030 *** ------------------

Successful Scenario
Due to Golden State and Indiana being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Golden State and Indiana had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Successful Scenario
There were BYC players involved in this trade, so this trade is subject to the BYC provisions of the CBA. Due to Golden State and Minnesota being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Golden State and Minnesota had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out unless trade exceptions were used for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Successful Scenario
Due to Golden State and Milwaukee being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Golden State and Milwaukee had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Successful Scenario
Due to Golden State and Cleveland being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Golden State and Cleveland had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Successful Scenario
Due to Golden State and Boston being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Golden State and Boston had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

First, about the big ones. They sound great on paper for the Warriors... and that's the reason they won't work. No team would accept trading his star players for worse ones. Indy tryed to trade O'Neal, but it was for Chris Bosh. They would never do it for our scrubs. Each time a good player is traded for a bunch of scrubs, it's the exception, not the rule.

If you're going to propose trading for a star, keep in mind they're going to ask for one of ours, like Baron or J-Rich. If not, there's always gotta be a better offer from other team.

About the other trades, the Cavs one could work, but it would take a third team. If not, the Cavs would be too thin up front. I don't think they would make that trade without getting an inside player at least.

The Milwaukee one... it could work too, but we'd only get Simmons (Joe Smith wouldn't re-sign with us). We may be giving up too much just for Simmons. I'd do it if it were a Dun/Cabarkkdjbaspa for Simmons alone.

I like the Mil & Clev proposals, and bear in mind ... I'D BE WILLING TO GIVE UP ( up to ) 3 FIRST ROUND PICKS. That has to be appealing to some team?!............. Oh yeah..... I was bored and fed up with losing games with only 4-5 people giving a concentrated effort on the court................( We ( I ) dont want Joe after his contract expires )--------------------------------------------- *** 030 *** --------------------------------