The
sociocrats are at it again! Here comes another ‘use-the-women’
program. This one is called “A
Woman’s Nation.” None other than the wife of the California
Governor was enlisted to launch the project and con other women into participating.
She ought to know better, but obviously she does not. It
seems plain to many of us that this project will be used to organize women
to promote legislation that will destroy their own freedom. However, a
good many naive females get all goosey bumpy about being called leaders
and being asked for their uninformed opinions. They can hardly wait to
participate.

As usual,
recruitment begins with flattery. The Bible says, "A flattering mouth
worketh ruin" (Proverbs 26:28), but the Gov’s wife
lays it on: “Women are architects of change." "I am constantly
inspired by the stories, ideas, and courage of women.” "This
country is now what I like to call ‘A Woman’s Nation.'"
"I am thrilled to launch ‘A Woman’s Nation’ a national
project to paint the modern portrait of the American woman." "Women
are becoming the primary breadwinners in more families than ever before."

After
telling women how wonderful they are and how well they are doing the Gov’s
wife gets down to business. She informs us that there will be discussions
and roundtables, interviews with cultural icons and women leaders, research
and reporting—all co-sponsored by TIME magazine.

The
goal, we are told, is to promote a new definition of who the American
woman is today, and what she needs and expects from our nation’s
economic, cultural, and social institutions in order to thrive now and
in the future. A book edited by feminists Heather Boushey and Ann O’Leary
will be published this fall to report the findings

In other
words—and without all the falderal—there is more suppressive
women’s lib legislation in the hopper and it will take a multi-million-dollar
promotion and lots of sociological-type deception to put it over. But
fear not, American Woman, the Center for American Progress and the USC
Annenberg Center on Communication, Leadership, and Policy know how to
get things done. They know the pattern. They will follow the script. The
goal very likely will be achieved. (For an example of scripting for change
see Why
Things Are The Way They Are P. 115-121)

Advertisement

The
discussions, roundtables, interviews, research and reporting mentioned
previously will be called scientific investigation. The legislators will
believe the claim that real scientists are involved, and they will vote
in favor of the laws even if they are not totally convinced that the result
will be beneficial.

For
a while everything will look hunky-dory to the home folks who don’t
really know much more than their Congressmen do about the goals of the
system. The states will go along as they always have, UNLESS some kind
of miracle puts a stop to the process.

I believe
you can gain some idea what laws might be contemplated if you know that
the plans for women were laid out more than 150 years ago by Auguste Comte,
the Crazy Frenchman and father of sociology, who died in 1857.

One
of Comte’s most important goals for the future was to have all babies
be the offspring of spouseless mothers. The reason given was that women
can transfer their emotional nature to the children so that the heart
will rule over the intellect. That, Comte believed, will lead first, to
the worship of women, and then, to worship of all humanity as a collective
entity.

Comte
claimed that in raising children, “a female friend, if well chosen,
who could make herself a member of the family, would in most cases do
better than the father himself.” That was a call made more than
150 years ago for female/female families. It means that what the Gov’s
wife said about women becoming primary breadwinners in more families than
ever before is the obvious result of sociological manipulation and seduction.

With
sociological sex education little girls are being pre-seduced before they
leave junior high, and even before their first date. They are already
“hot to trot” at age 13 and before.

Since
female only and female/female families exist in large numbers, and are
encouraged by universities, and by government and foundation grants, the
coming legislation will certainly be focused on making life easier for
spouseless mothers. Look at progress social science has made in the past
150 years toward the sociological goal of eliminating male participation
in child raising.

ILLEGITIMACY
RATES IN 1919 – “The city of Washington has an illegitimacy
rate of 7.6 per cent., but that of the whites is 2.3 per cent., while
that of the colored folk is 19.5 per cent. Likewise, Baltimore’s
rate of 6.6 per cent., can be analyzed into race rates of 3.1 per cent.,
and 24.6.” -- What Is America Edward Alsworth Ross, Ph.D.,
LL.D., Professor of Sociology, University of Wisconsin; The Century Co.
1919; P. 41-43.

ILLEGITIMACY
RATES IN 1999 - “In 1999 1.3 million babies were born to single
mothers—a record . . . The problem is staggering: a 69% illegitimacy
rate among black women . . . 42.2% among Hispanics and 22.1% among whites.”
INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY, April 19, 2001.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

Observe
the "Woman’s Nation” program as it progresses. Share
your observations with your friends. Perhaps you can find a way to reduce
the enthusiasm of some of the goosey bumpy females who think they are
leaders and world changers. Let them know they are following a script
written more that 150 years ago.

Understanding
past sneaky changes does help one understand the sneaky changes of the
present and the future.

Erica Carle is an independent researcher and
writer. She has a B.S. degree from the University of Wisconsin. She has
been involved in radio and television writing and production, and has
also taught math and composition at the private school her children attended
in Brookfield, Wisconsin. For ten years she wrote a weekly column, "Truth
In Education" for WISCONSIN REPORT, and served as Education Editor for
that publication.

For a while everything
will look hunky-dory to the home folks who don’t really know much
more than their Congressmen do about the goals of the system. The states
will go along as they always have, UNLESS some kind of miracle puts a
stop to the process.