Receive Holy Communion On The Tongue

I think that the manner of reception of Holy Communion and the attitude to the Blessed Sacrament is very important.

Since Vatican II, we have seen a marked emphasis on the meal aspect of the Eucharist at the expense of the Sacrificial aspect. Yet the Church teaches, and has always taught that the Eucharist is indeed a Sacrifice. Pope John Paul II referred to Jesus' institution of "the Eucharistic Sacrifice of His body and blood," which is, he said, not only a reminder but also "the sacramental re-presentation of the Lord's passion and death" (Ecclesia de Eucharistia, 11).

Perhaps the sacrificial dimension of the Eucharist is uncomfortable for many of us. Of course, we have no experiential concept of sacrifice apart from the Eucharist itself. This action would be immediately recognised for what it is by anyone who knew what a sacrifice is: all the elements are there, altar, bound victim, the priest who offers the sacrifice.

The sacrificial model comes to us from the Old Testament and is evident through the New Testament as the model which is applied to Christ. This is why we often see a bound lamb used as a symbol for Christ. People often think the lamb is used because it is gentle and mild and so was Jesus. They are shocked to discover that it is because Jesus is the lamb of God who was sacrificed for our salvation.

The three models of sacrifice in Scripture perhaps exemplified by the sacrifice of Noah (Genesis 8:20), Abraham's sacrifice of Isaac (Genesis 22:2), and the sacrifice of Elijah on Mount Carmel (1 Kings 18:38). In the holocaust, an animal is killed and burned before God as an act of humble submission and thanksgiving, and it serves as the basic model of sacrifice in current Western theology. This is the sacrifice St. Paul has in mind in Ephesians 5:2 when he writes: "Christ loved us and handed Himself over as an offering and sacrifice to God in the odour of sweetness." It has the advantage of accounting well for the centrality of our Lord's saving death, where what is pleasing to God the Father is the total gift of himself made by His Son, and there is no question, therefore, that this notion of sacrifice goes to the heart of the matter, if it fails to cover every aspect of the Sacrifice of the Cross itself.

This is just a brief outline of this issue and the point is to show how, if the Eucharist is indeed "the source and summit of Christian life" (CCC 1324) we should make some effort to understand how and why, and how we each treat it and consider it in our own life.

This whole concept is one I find quintessentially theological, in that we have been given and believe something de facto, but we do not know, or maybe are not sure of exactly what it means or how to explain it. Charting the course of theology over the centuries shows the Church reacting to questions about this issue and slowly drawing more and more meaning from the deposit of faith it has been given.

I think when one considers the sacrificial dimension of the Eucharist, it takes on a more spiritual and profound significance than when we just consider it somehow a shared meal, although this is also a dimension of Eucharist, and of ancient sacrifice as well.

A huge piece in this jigsaw puzzle as far as I can see is the manner of our reception of Jesus in Holy Communion. The way we go up to communion is pivotal, as even the bishops of England and Wales express in their document One Bread One Body, as it is the manner in which we prepare ourselves to receive Jesus. We must be properly prepared, have the right demeanour and disposition, and be in a state of grace having confessed our sins to a priest. It is possible to ignore these instructions and fool yourself and the priest...But you will not fool God:

Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be answerable for the body and blood of the Lord. ~ 1 Cor 11:27

More importantly, you will be amazed at the effect changing your disposition towards Holy Communion has on you, especially if you have not followed these steps before.

Now you know I don't always agree with Michael Voris but I really do think this video from him is great and explains the reasons we should all be receiving communion on the tongue really well:

You might also find this short film quite moving:

Prayers taught by the Angels:

My God, I believe, I adore, I hope, and I love You. I ask pardon for those who do not believe, do not adore, do not hope, and do not love You.

Most Holy Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, I adore You profoundly, and I offer You the Most Precious Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ, present in all the tabernacles of the world, in reparation for the outrages, sacrileges and indifferences by which He is offended. And by the infinite merits of His most Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I beg the conversion of poor sinners.

Requests and Admonitions of the Angel:

Pray, pray!

You must offer your prayers and sacrifices to God, the Most High.

In every way you can offer sacrifice to God in reparation for the sins by which He is offended, and in supplication for sinners.

Above all, bear and accept with patience the sufferings God will send you.

Eat and drink the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ terribly outraged by the ingratitude of men. Offer reparation for their sakes and console God.

Popular posts from this blog

The legend reads:<<Oi Frankie, you have emasculated Congregations, suspended priests, decapitated the Order of Malta and the Franciscans of the Immaculate, ignored Cardinals...But where is your mercy?>>

Christians faced with the ravages of Bergoglio...Roma e' tappezzata - Rome is carpeted!

A source told me that the posters near the Vatican have already been covered up; but they ARE ALL OVER ROME!!

Newman, Letter to the Duke of Norfolk, Diff., II, 279-280

Here I am led to interpose a remark;—it is plain, then, that there are those near, or with access, to the Holy Father, who would, if they could, go much further in the way of assertion and command, than the divine Assistentia, which overshadows him, wills or permits; so {280} that his acts and his words on doctrinal subjects must be carefully scrutinised and weighed, before we can be sure what really he has said. Utterances which must be received as comin…

A few of days ago I posted about a new book called The Dictator Pope which has been really causing a stir as it claims to be the inside story of the most tyrannical and unprincipled papacy of modern times.

Now this was first posted on One Peter Five, which I love, but some criticise because it is a site critical of progressive catholic attitudes and modernism. Anyway some people these days dismiss certain sources because they tend to contradict their own agenda. I don't, as I have said here numerous times before, we are all parts of the body of Christ and that body has many parts (cf. 1 Cor 12). If I agree with everything someone says, I'm probably reading my own blog. We all get it wrong sometimes.

Anyway, I was concerned initially that this would be seen as a diatribe against the pope with an agenda. This would make the contents easier to dismiss.Almost read “The Dictator Pope”, of course it is all libelous gossip, the Church is not a dictatorship, is it? — raymond blake (@r…

Vaticanista Marco Tossati reports that even the faithless men who put Pope Francis on the throne of St. Peter are losing patience with his laissez faire, "make a mess" approach to being pope.

In his article on the AAS inclusion of the Buenos Aires directives, he remarks:
A cardinal of great renown, a former diplomat, who has served an impressive career at the head of Congregations and in high offices in the Secretariat of State, is said to have reproved the Pope for his actions [as Pope], saying to him essentially, “We elected you to make reforms, not to smash everything.” News of this conversation — if it can be called a conversation — has spread through the Vatican, because it took place at a high decibel level, which carried through the fragile barrier of the doors and walls. The cardinal in question was one of those who supported the candidacy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio in the conclave of 2013.Gloria.tv reports that this is most likely the Argentinian Leonardo Sandri, the…