INT: Wolfgang Petersen

German
filmmaker Wolfgang Petersen dives into familiar waters (ha!) this week with
his latest film, the disaster epic POSEIDON.
25 years ago Petersen first introduced us to undersea terror with his
acclaimed World War II U-boat drama DAS BOOT. In 2000 he took us to the
surface in the harrowing THE PERFECT STORM. Now hes back in the water
again with his remake of the pioneering 1972 disaster film, THE POSEIDON
ADVENTURE.Last week
Petersen stopped by the Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel to talk about
POSEIDON. Check it out.

Wolfgang
Petersen

What
is your fascination with boats and water? This is your third film dealing
with those subjects.

Three
times is the charm. I love water. Very simple. I grew up in
Hamburg
, in the north of
Germany
. I love water. I have enormous respect for water. Sometimes I was really
afraid of water when I was a kid. I also witnessed that water, when it
really gets angry, is an unbelievable force of destruction. Probably the
most scary, more than fire and earthquakes and all that kind of stuff. So as
a storyteller, filmmaker later on, I knew about the enormous potential of
water as threat and as your friend. We all know this beautiful thing of
being in the water and everything is soothing and wonderful or its your
worse enemy. So for storytelling purposes its very dramatic.

And
then my other obsession is I want to watch people in a confined space where
they cannot run away and just see how they react to incredibly dramatic
situations. Again thats great drama. Its very clear now for me if you
have somebody on the water and maybe the drama what these people inside a
thing. If they are confronted to the danger of water then you have the
highest possible drama that you can imagine. All of a sudden this submarine
drama came and I said Jesus Christ its perfect for that. They are really
trapped inside. 45 people and its a big thing. Its war and maybe you
can tell more about war with 45 people stuck in a submarine in the water and
being underwater, above water, and go through storm in the water and depth
charges in the water and everything and then finally always, always, always,
water is the real bad guy. Not so much the depth charges, the water coming
when all of a sudden the hulls break in the boat and the water comes in.

The
real danger for the submarines is if they go too deep water comes and the
water pressure goes [claps hands] and theyre gone. They are like a stamp.
It doesnt get more dramatic than that. Then after that youve got
Perfect Storm, and I figured oh my God we can do similar things on a
completely different thing with fishermen and now came the idea of Poseidon
now with regular people on a big ship and still a claustrophobic situation
where nobody can run again. Its upside-down. They are stuck, but they are
not professionals, they are human beings. I thought that was a great idea to
now see in this day and age with so many disasters we are now living through
and going through and are shocked by.

You
know, 9/11 and tsunami, Katrina, and all that. I think a disaster film that
truly, really goes away from the old movie and tries to make it as realistic
as possible is a nail biter in the sense of you feel and smell the reality
of how a disaster really, what it really means then an audience who feels
watching people like you and me, not like movie stars, is another great
drama.

Will
there be a longer cut on the DVD?

No.
Its a short film because I said to the studio from the very beginning
this would be a short film. My films were always more on the long side. This
would be a short film for one special reason. After the first 15 minutes
when the boat goes. The boat is not only upside-down, sitting there like in
the old film, its sinking. Its slowly sinking, which means we dont
know exactly how much time we have. We might have an hour, we might have 90
minutes, we might have two hours before rescue comes or before the ship is
gone. So there is an urgency throughout the whole movie of you better get
out of here because rescue might not come that quick and the boat might go
quick.

I had
the feeling its cool and also because to make it fast and to make it short
and also to make it so intense. I had reactions from people on the verge of
leaving the theater because they go so claustrophobic and so hyper
ventilating in scenes about drowning and drowning themselves all that kind
of stuff and going through the A/C vent and other things. If I make it 100
minutes all together I think thats all they can really take. And dont
forget the film is coming out in IMAX. The whole thing will be in IMAX. I
think this will be the most intense thing an audience can have and I think
the length is perfect or that. Dont make it too long.

Can
rogue waves really happen?

Oh
absolutely. Its a movie so we go just one step further, but the rogue
waves that are out there are very unpredictable and very dangerous and
sometimes very high. Over 100 feet. They are a reality. Its only a matter
of because they come out of nowhere like in our film and they are there for
maybe a minute or two and then they fall down again. Its only if a ship
is by pure coincidence in the path of a wave like that. The ship cannot do
much, like in our film you can try desperately to turn around. In most cases
it doesnt work. Its all on the internet by the way, all the realistic
drama about the rogue wave.

For
the last 30 years, 60 container ships were destroyed by rogue waves. Its
unbelievable and these are big and they are very top-heavy container ships
and if they get a wave like that, voom, they go. And they were not even
hanging upside-down, they were gone. Swallowed. Dead. Kaput. It can happen
and also, talking about a cruise ship, Queen Elizabeth, went all the way
over to the side and it took awhile but then with the last bit of strength
the ship came back up. Its a very famous thing and they survived and
thats what I do. In our case I go even further. It rolls all the way over
to this side and now it comes out again  thats of course the movie
part of it  and it comes out again we think for a moment it might have
the strength to go and right itself up while these explosions are on the
ship, but it doesnt have the strength and the boat goes and stays.

There
is minimal dialogue towards the end of the film and yet an actor like Josh
Lucas has to convey a lot of emotion. Was that deliberate?

Yes. I
think he did wonderful. I think he did great. I think thats the whole
concept that I was really intrigued by this is not film where dialogue
really establishes characters and they exchange emotions and all that kind
of thing. Theres no time to do that. I was really interested in the fact
that this is a bunch of people, like 10, 12 people, as we all know less and
less that are thrown together. They dont know each other at all. They
have maybe brief encounters before the roll, but they dont know anything
about each other. At all and now they are together.

They
are all of a sudden a group of strangers and they explain themselves through
the action. Through what they go through, how they react with brief moments
here and brief moments there so that a Josh for example who is in the
beginning as we know more like a selfish card player throughout the action
all of sudden he starts and hes not wanting to really take these
strangers because they might slow him down in his quest. They almost force
themselves onto him and he slowly more and more takes on this part of a
leader and discovers in a way, but without sitting down and having two pages
of dialogue with somebody.

Oh how
are you? Im Josh, who are you? Lets talk about my family and your
family. You cannot have this kind of dialogue, but throughout the action we
more and more learn at least a little bit about him and his growing
responsibility for other people that he obviously didnt have before.
Thats more or less with all the other characters in a similar way they
only have these small moments here and these small moments there and a lot
of what they are and how they are as characters comes through the action.
Through their behavior within these stressful situations.

Do
you take a small amount of pleasure in putting these actors through these
uncomfortable, dangerous situations?

Im
not saying I take great pleasure in it. I take great pleasure in the fact
that I dont have to do that and that I can watch it in the safety and
security of a video monitor. Sometimes then, of course, I have to say,
lets do it again. Im a little bit of a perfectionist Im afraid. I
must tell you, the actors, even if I talk up front with them I tell them
that this is very hard and very tough and Im always impressed 
especially on Poseidon  that everybody also really wanted to do it
themselves. They are really and I think they are very proud now when they
see the film that you can see in every single scene basically you can see
its really them doing it. Its not some clever thing with stunt guys
and now a close up again of the actor.

How
did you use the original Poseidon as a reference? Did you look at it for
what to do and what not to do?(Minor
Spoiler)

With
all due respect I must tell you that a lot of what not to do because at
looking at the old movie today it was a very impressive film at the time, 35
years ago, but if you watch it again you can only watch it with a smile on
your face in the sense of oh my god it was 72 and they did at that time
and it has a charm because of that and it was quite campy and also the
acting style was a bit melodramatic and the effects were, of course, in
light of 72, fairly poor. I think nowadays if you do a film in 2006 about
the Poseidon disaster then you try to avoid all those things and try to make
it more for 2006 in the sense of as much reality as you can give it.

And as
much honesty as you can give it and really try to get an audience of today
that is so used to and frightened by disasters left and right get them a
true feeling of what disaster could be and means and invites an audience
also to see, come in and be with these people in the safety of your seat in
the theater, but live with them through it and see what would you do because
it can happen to everybody. We here sitting in this room and at this very
moment a huge earthquake could happen. The world is upside-down and we as a
group now might have to go somewhere and all of a sudden we have decisions
to make maybe like Dreyfuss did when he kicked off Valentine in the food
elevator. Would I do that? Would I kill this person or not? Interesting
questions.

Are
you gonna be the one who finally brings Enders Game to the film world?

I hope
so. At the moment its very much in my head again. Were getting the
script in a few weeks and if everything goes fine and that script goes in
the right direction it could indeed be my next one.

Are
there any kids today that you think could be Ender?

To
tell you the truth I dont. I think that would really probably a 1,000 kid
search.

Couldnt
that be like the next Harry Potter series with all the empowered young kids?

It
could be and also it could be a great 3-D version of Enders with all that
fighting in the battle stations. I think Enders was a little bit of an
inspiration for Harry Potter.

Will
Worlds Finest ever happen?

That
is, since now Warner Bros. is establishing Superman again will probably
It might happen, but it might also happen when Im 85. Who knows because
they first have to get their Superman going.