If
recently published reports are true, and I have no reason to
doubt they are, then the judgment, reputation and credibility of
many a journalist and politician have been irrevocably destroyed
along with the myths planted by Barack Obama, who apparently
has a great deal of explaining to do about who he is, where he
came from and why he's using another person's Social Security
number.

In a May 11, 2010 article, WorldNetDaily's Jerome Corsi reports
that
two independent investigations by two different
investigators in two different states (using two different data
sources) discovered that the Social Security number used by
Barack Obama mysteriously coincides with Social Security numbers
verified to have been issued by the state of Connecticut between
1977 and 1979, a full two years after Obama's first,
publicly-documented record of employment at a Hawaii
Baskin-Robbins back in 1975. OUCH.

For over a year, those who value the Constitution and still
possess critical thinking skills have insisted that something in
Barack Obama's records (or, rather what isn't in Obama's
records) stinks to High Heaven. As a result of that public
skepticism, we've been viciously attacked by so-called
"journalists", politicians, pundits and Obama's base. Some who
dared question, like Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, even face
career-ending prosecutions as a result.

Lakin's story has been completely ignored by the mainstream
media. A US Army officer defying orders, challenging the
legitimacy of the President of the United States and facing
court-martial is a huge international story by any measure.
It garnered 196,008 hits on Yahoo and 146,000 hits on Google.
But, for the Associated Press, it’s quite a different story.
Despite their empty protestations of the people’s right to know,
not one single hit on the search term "Lt. Col. Terry Lakin" was
found in the AP’s exhaustive, world-wide archives:

It matters not if Barack Obama stonewalls, if the AP ignores the
story or if Bill O’Reilly wishes it away; for it does appear
that the smoking gun pointing to Obama’s illegitimacy may
have finally been located, although O’Reilly’s journalistic
giblets and his apology to the good Lt. Col. remain MIA.
O’Reilly’s dismissal of those wanting Obama to prove his
eligibility is no different than politicians dismissing Tea
Party concerns over health care cost or effects without reading
the bill; wilful ignorance. Unfortunately for the O'Reillys of
the world who have staked their professional reputations on the
silly notion that the issue had been resolved by a newspaper ad,
it hasn’t.

The evidence uncovered by these two private investigators was
arrived at independently and fits perfectly with the numerous
allegations of forged documentation made previously,
particularly Obama’s Selective Service registration.

•Those who dismissed this issue poo-pooed the Constitutional
question as trite and irrelevant.
•They said the election decided the issue.
•They said Barack Obama had been vetted.
•They said the issue of his eligibility had been “raised,
vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by
America’s vigilant citizenry”.
•They said we were kooks; that there were more important issues
we needed to consider.
•They alleged a huge "birther" conspiracy cooked up by racist
Neanderthals who also believed the Earth was flat.

If this report is true, Barack Obama committed the crime of
identity theft and quite likely used the poison fruits of
that crime to usurp the office of President of the United
States, just like I and others who had the courage to go on
record had said he did.

But I'll go a step further: He couldn’t pull something like this
off alone. He would have needed help forging documents and
forming the alleged conspiracy. Besides his inner circle, that
help would have lurked within Health and Human Services, the
Social Security Administration or another federal agency. His
co-conspirators must be tracked down, arrested, tried and if
found guilty, they must be thrown in the US Army’s Disciplinary
Barracks at Fort Leavenworth along with this phony. All
social security numbers used by the usurper must be traced to
their points of origin and any discrepancies must be
investigated, punished and fully disclosed in a public forum.

These two investigators stand solidly behind their claims. The
time for concrete answers to the questions surrounding just who
America elected in 2008 are long overdue. The evidence that he
isn't who he says he is has now become too overwhelming to
ignore. The damage he's doing to our economy and social
structure is far too extensive to allow this evil charade to
continue any longer.

Senator Jim DeMint said that health care legislation would be
Obama's Waterloo. DeMint was right that there would be a
Waterloo, but health care wasn't it. Nor will it be energy,
jobs, taxes, Cap and Trade, free speech, or any other 1,000-page
legislative priority. It won't even be his birth certificate. It
will quite likely be two other pieces of documentation, both of
which he subverted for his own twisted aims; a social
security number and the US Constitution.

Jayme
Evans is a veteran of the United States Navy, military
analyst, conservative columnist and an advocate and voice for
disabled and other veterans. He has served for many years as a
Subject Matter Expert in systems software testing, and currently
serves as a technical lead in that capacity. He has extensively
studied amateur astronomy and metallurgy, as well as military
and US history. Source: War of Wits, also published at
CanadaFreePress.com.