Our Secretary of State is wandering from country to country, trying to drum up support for a war with Iran, backed by the moronically brilliant National Security Advisor, the same dude that so skillfully lead George W. Bush to invade Iraq to search for non existent WMD's. For some strange reason, the British Commander of the allied forces in the Middle East, doesn't see the same threat posed by Iran as our illustrious leaders do, or at least, pretend to see.

What could possibly prompt the United States, already embroiled in multiple wars simultaneously, to seek an additional war? I don't know, we'd have to ask ole Net and Jared Kushner. We could ask Bolton, but he's barely competent enough to order a meal from a menu containing more than three items. It's no secret that Bolton has been aching for a war with Iran for some time, well, a war with anybody at all really.

If someone, anyone, made a list of total amounts of ordnance used in foreign countries against civilian populations, the United States would be at the top of that list, with Iran somewhere below Saudi Arabia. It is quite clear that the US is actively trying to goad Iran into doing something to spark a war, is trying desperately to convince other countries of the need to attack Iran immediately and spinning this false narrative to create a false flag event. What is remarkable, is that Iran's Supreme Leader is wise to this farce, prompting him to emphatically state that there will NOT be war with the US. Of Course, that does not preclude the US from going ahead with it's war plans, so we'll see whether or not their conjob is successful.

Our Secretary of State is wandering from country to country, trying to drum up support for a war with Iran, backed by the moronically brilliant National Security Advisor, the same dude that so skillfully lead George W. Bush to invade Iraq to search for non existent WMD's. For some strange reason, the British Commander of the allied forces in the Middle East, doesn't see the same threat posed by Iran as our illustrious leaders do, or at least, pretend to see.

What could possibly prompt the United States, already embroiled in multiple wars simultaneously, to seek an additional war? I don't know, we'd have to ask ole Net and Jared Kushner. We could ask Bolton, but he's barely competent enough to order a meal from a menu containing more than three items. It's no secret that Bolton has been aching for a war with Iran for some time, well, a war with anybody at all really.

If someone, anyone, made a list of total amounts of ordnance used in foreign countries against civilian populations, the United States would be at the top of that list, with Iran somewhere below Saudi Arabia. It is quite clear that the US is actively trying to goad Iran into doing something to spark a war, is trying desperately to convince other countries of the need to attack Iran immediately and spinning this false narrative to create a false flag event. What is remarkable, is that Iran's Supreme Leader is wise to this farce, prompting him to emphatically state that there will NOT be war with the US. Of Course, that does not preclude the US from going ahead with it's war plans, so we'll see whether or not their conjob is successful.

Our Secretary of State is wandering from country to country, trying to drum up support for a war with Iran, backed by the moronically brilliant National Security Advisor, the same dude that so skillfully lead George W. Bush to invade Iraq to search for non existent WMD's. For some strange reason, the British Commander of the allied forces in the Middle East, doesn't see the same threat posed by Iran as our illustrious leaders do, or at least, pretend to see.

What could possibly prompt the United States, already embroiled in multiple wars simultaneously, to seek an additional war? I don't know, we'd have to ask ole Net and Jared Kushner. We could ask Bolton, but he's barely competent enough to order a meal from a menu containing more than three items. It's no secret that Bolton has been aching for a war with Iran for some time, well, a war with anybody at all really.

If someone, anyone, made a list of total amounts of ordnance used in foreign countries against civilian populations, the United States would be at the top of that list, with Iran somewhere below Saudi Arabia. It is quite clear that the US is actively trying to goad Iran into doing something to spark a war, is trying desperately to convince other countries of the need to attack Iran immediately and spinning this false narrative to create a false flag event. What is remarkable, is that Iran's Supreme Leader is wise to this farce, prompting him to emphatically state that there will NOT be war with the US. Of Course, that does not preclude the US from going ahead with it's war plans, so we'll see whether or not their conjob is successful.

Oh, you mean the British commander who works for the British government which wants to continue doing business with the Persian theocracy whose sole purpose is to exterminate the Jewish nation? The peaceful mullahs who are funding the majority of terrorism in the Middle East?

Oh, you mean the British commander who works for the British government which wants to continue doing business with the Persian theocracy whose sole purpose is to exterminate the Jewish nation? The peaceful mullahs who are funding the majority of terrorism in the Middle East?

I am afraid you are wrong, the biggest founders of terrorism in the Middle East are Saudi including funding and staffing the 9-11 attacks.

Our Secretary of State is wandering from country to country, trying to drum up support for a war with Iran, backed by the moronically brilliant National Security Advisor, the same dude that so skillfully lead George W. Bush to invade Iraq to search for non existent WMD's. For some strange reason, the British Commander of the allied forces in the Middle East, doesn't see the same threat posed by Iran as our illustrious leaders do, or at least, pretend to see.

What could possibly prompt the United States, already embroiled in multiple wars simultaneously, to seek an additional war? I don't know, we'd have to ask ole Net and Jared Kushner. We could ask Bolton, but he's barely competent enough to order a meal from a menu containing more than three items. It's no secret that Bolton has been aching for a war with Iran for some time, well, a war with anybody at all really.

If someone, anyone, made a list of total amounts of ordnance used in foreign countries against civilian populations, the United States would be at the top of that list, with Iran somewhere below Saudi Arabia. It is quite clear that the US is actively trying to goad Iran into doing something to spark a war, is trying desperately to convince other countries of the need to attack Iran immediately and spinning this false narrative to create a false flag event. What is remarkable, is that Iran's Supreme Leader is wise to this farce, prompting him to emphatically state that there will NOT be war with the US. Of Course, that does not preclude the US from going ahead with it's war plans, so we'll see whether or not their conjob is successful.

Our Secretary of State is wandering from country to country, trying to drum up support for a war with Iran, backed by the moronically brilliant National Security Advisor, the same dude that so skillfully lead George W. Bush to invade Iraq to search for non existent WMD's. For some strange reason, the British Commander of the allied forces in the Middle East, doesn't see the same threat posed by Iran as our illustrious leaders do, or at least, pretend to see.

What could possibly prompt the United States, already embroiled in multiple wars simultaneously, to seek an additional war? I don't know, we'd have to ask ole Net and Jared Kushner. We could ask Bolton, but he's barely competent enough to order a meal from a menu containing more than three items. It's no secret that Bolton has been aching for a war with Iran for some time, well, a war with anybody at all really.

If someone, anyone, made a list of total amounts of ordnance used in foreign countries against civilian populations, the United States would be at the top of that list, with Iran somewhere below Saudi Arabia. It is quite clear that the US is actively trying to goad Iran into doing something to spark a war, is trying desperately to convince other countries of the need to attack Iran immediately and spinning this false narrative to create a false flag event. What is remarkable, is that Iran's Supreme Leader is wise to this farce, prompting him to emphatically state that there will NOT be war with the US. Of Course, that does not preclude the US from going ahead with it's war plans, so we'll see whether or not their conjob is successful.

Our Secretary of State is wandering from country to country, trying to drum up support for a war with Iran, backed by the moronically brilliant National Security Advisor, the same dude that so skillfully lead George W. Bush to invade Iraq to search for non existent WMD's. For some strange reason, the British Commander of the allied forces in the Middle East, doesn't see the same threat posed by Iran as our illustrious leaders do, or at least, pretend to see.

What could possibly prompt the United States, already embroiled in multiple wars simultaneously, to seek an additional war? I don't know, we'd have to ask ole Net and Jared Kushner. We could ask Bolton, but he's barely competent enough to order a meal from a menu containing more than three items. It's no secret that Bolton has been aching for a war with Iran for some time, well, a war with anybody at all really.

If someone, anyone, made a list of total amounts of ordnance used in foreign countries against civilian populations, the United States would be at the top of that list, with Iran somewhere below Saudi Arabia. It is quite clear that the US is actively trying to goad Iran into doing something to spark a war, is trying desperately to convince other countries of the need to attack Iran immediately and spinning this false narrative to create a false flag event. What is remarkable, is that Iran's Supreme Leader is wise to this farce, prompting him to emphatically state that there will NOT be war with the US. Of Course, that does not preclude the US from going ahead with it's war plans, so we'll see whether or not their conjob is successful.

You should check your history instead of the liberal revisionist history.

Any idea which democrat congress voted to go to war with Iraq because of WMD and the number of yes votes by democrats? History shows the reason that Bush went to war with Iraq was the exact same reason Democrats voted "yes" for war against Iraq.. And the factual history reason is?

Liberals have mastered "Tell a lie often, over and over, until it becomes truth" The last two and a half years the liberal media has been over drive in revisionist history in real time 24/7 not so different from the Bush years.

You should check your history instead of the liberal revisionist history.

Any idea which democrat congress voted to go to war with Iraq because of WMD and the number of yes votes by democrats? History shows the reason that Bush went to war with Iraq was the exact same reason Democrats voted "yes" for war against Iraq.. And the factual history reason is?

Liberals have mastered "Tell a lie often, over and over, until it becomes truth" The last two and a half years the liberal media has been over drive in revisionist history in real time 24/7 not so different from the Bush years.

I find it interesting that the Schumer, Reid, Kerry, HILLARY CLINTON, BIDEN, Feinstein have been the leaders in pushing the false narrative that Bush went to war for "The Oil" after they are the ones that voted for the Iraq war and where's the oil they claim Bush went to war for? The other lie they pushed was The war was so Cheney could make money from his stock in Haliburton since they were contracted to put out the oil rig fires, but the facts tell a different story. Haliburton was the only company on earth with Hugh equipment and man power resources. There were dozens of smaller companies called to put out the oil fires that burned for nearly two years and if you combine every oil company that puts out oil fires, combined they still are only a fraction of the size and resources of Haliburton. Even with the combined efforts the constant bomb attacks on the oil wells made it impossible for any company other than Haliburton to lead the rescue.

Why did congress vote yes for the Iraq War and Bush execute.

Both branches of our Government congress and President Bush were given false information and had it been factual, the war would have been justified. But Bush and the democrats were fooled. Factual history would not blame the Democrats, Republicans or Bush for starting the Iraq war but rightfully should blame the CIA.

Back when CNN was a little less fake news they lead the bombshell story how the CIA produced evidence of WMD http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intelligence/index.htmlAlso if you search you will find that under the Obama Administration the military did in fact find WMD but this time the media was crickets and by remaining crickets it helped fuel the false narratives.

Why would Trump’s innocents make him go to war? Have you heard the latest comments from Mueller? Perhaps catch up.

No Collusion, no obstruction. Just a president with a tarnished past cheating with sex, he errors tweeting because he blurts but has exploded our economy and has over 100 major accomplishments none including crimes. Name one president that did not tell a lie, have unsavory past and always make the right decision?

Why would Trump’s innocents make him go to war? Have you heard the latest comments from Mueller? Perhaps catch up.

No Collusion, no obstruction. Just a president with a tarnished past cheating with sex, he errors tweeting because he blurts but has exploded our economy and has over 100 major accomplishments none including crimes. Name one president that did not tell a lie, have unsavory past and always make the right decision?

The Mueller report did not exonorat him 8 counts of obstruction with plenty of evidence