August 20, 2013

Roger Simon hit it out of the park yesterday in his must-read piece on Barack Obama's (and even John McCain's) strange love affair with the Muslim Brotherhood (emphasis mine):

It's hard to fathom how or why our administration ever thought the Muslim Brotherhood saw democracy as other than a means to an end -- and a particularly repellent one at that -- in the first place.

It's not as if the MB is subtle. They have proclaimed who they are since their founding by Hasan al Banna in 1928 and have not wavered in any significant way since in their global jihadist goals. They have also been unstinting in their massive misogyny, homophobia and rigid support of Shariah law über alles (quite literally über alles, since the Brotherhood were -- virtually the last still unrepentant -- allies of Hitler in WWII).

That's from the Muslim Brotherhood's "General Strategic Goal" for North America. The "miserable house" of Western civilization of course includes all the tenets of classical liberalism and most of those laterally paid lip service by today's soi-disant "liberals" (rights of women, rights of homosexuals, freedom of expression, ad tedium, ad hypocrisia).

And yet those same liberals -- not to mention the increasingly addle-brained John McCain who seemingly can't tell an al-Qaeda operative from Paul Revere --- are suddenly pounding Saharan sand in outrage at the extreme treatment of the Brotherhood at the hands of the mean Egyptian military.

Give me the proverbial break!

The only hope for democracy in Egypt -- and it's a mighty slim one, maybe the size of a third of an M&M crushed under a camel -- is the military. At least they're not insane.

Nevertheless, the president of the United States is not amused. We read our government is secretly "reviewing" our support of Egypt. They are urging the Egyptian military to negotiate with the Brotherhood, the same religious fanatics who evidently just told 24 Egyptian policemen to lie face down in the Sinai desert and summarily executed them, the same madmen who are running all over Egypt burning down Christian churches.

What is the explanation for this absolutely self-destructive, even idiotic, policy on our part?

There can be only one -- the president of the United States is actually psychologically disturbed. He does not react in a normal manner. I know that's a vicious and importunate thing to say, but the reaction to Egypt (and to Benghazi, for that matter) is not one of a psychologically healthy human being.

It's more than the narcissism of which he is often accused, as bad as that is. It's a form of extreme neurotic attraction to (notably Islamic) religious fascism. Obama is not a Muslim, but he has these deep feelings about it (some of them related to imperialism, others to his absent father, no doubt) that allow him to overlook, or rationalize, all that hideous misogyny, homophobia, and jihadist fanaticism, that loathing of democracy and freedom, even when it could not be more obvious. To Obama, those abhorrent -- monumentally illiberal -- behaviors and ideologies almost seem irrelevant. But they are the most relevant of all. ...

Hard as I've tried to rationalize how a U.S. president can be stuck on supporting a terrorist organization like the Muslim Brotherhood, I just can't think of an answer. Simon's piece comes about as close to answering that question as I think anyone can. As for John 'RINO' 'increasingly addle-brained' McCain ... Simon falls way short in explaining his lunacy.

\n\nRoger Simon hit it out of the park yesterday in his must-read piece on Barack Obama's (and even John McCain's) strange love affair with the Muslim Brotherhood (emphasis mine):

It's hard to fathom how or why our administration ever thought the Muslim Brotherhood saw democracy as other than a means to an end -- and a particularly repellent one at that -- in the first place.\n\nIt's not as if the MB is subtle. They have proclaimed who they are since their founding by Hasan al Banna in 1928 and have not wavered in any significant way since in their global jihadist goals. They have also been unstinting in their massive misogyny, homophobia and rigid support of Shariah law über alles (quite literally über alles, since the Brotherhood were -- virtually the last still unrepentant -- allies of Hitler in WWII).\n\nYou know, liberal stuff.\n\nDemocracy, as their kissing cousin Turkey's Erdogan so blithely explained, is \"like a streetcar. When you come to your stop, you get off.\" Or, as one of the Brotherhood's own internal documents put it in that oh-so-distant year of 2007, they (the MB) are dedicated to \"eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house.\"\n\nThat's from the Muslim Brotherhood's \"General Strategic Goal\" for North America. The \"miserable house\" of Western civilization of course includes all the tenets of classical liberalism and most of those laterally paid lip service by today's soi-disant \"liberals\" (rights of women, rights of homosexuals, freedom of expression, ad tedium, ad hypocrisia).\n\nAnd yet those same liberals -- not to mention the increasingly addle-brained John McCain who seemingly can't tell an al-Qaeda operative from Paul Revere --- are suddenly pounding Saharan sand in outrage at the extreme treatment of the Brotherhood at the hands of the mean Egyptian military.\n\nGive me the proverbial break!\n\nThe only hope for democracy in Egypt -- and it's a mighty slim one, maybe the size of a third of an M&M crushed under a camel -- is the military. At least they're not insane.\n\nNevertheless, the president of the United States is not amused. We read our government is secretly \"reviewing\" our support of Egypt. They are urging the Egyptian military to negotiate with the Brotherhood, the same religious fanatics who evidently just told 24 Egyptian policemen to lie face down in the Sinai desert and summarily executed them, the same madmen who are running all over Egypt burning down Christian churches.\n\nWhat is the explanation for this absolutely self-destructive, even idiotic, policy on our part?\n\nThere can be only one -- the president of the United States is actually psychologically disturbed. He does not react in a normal manner. I know that's a vicious and importunate thing to say, but the reaction to Egypt (and to Benghazi, for that matter) is not one of a psychologically healthy human being.\n\nIt's more than the narcissism of which he is often accused, as bad as that is. It's a form of extreme neurotic attraction to (notably Islamic) religious fascism. Obama is not a Muslim, but he has these deep feelings about it (some of them related to imperialism, others to his absent father, no doubt) that allow him to overlook, or rationalize, all that hideous misogyny, homophobia, and jihadist fanaticism, that loathing of democracy and freedom, even when it could not be more obvious. To Obama, those abhorrent -- monumentally illiberal -- behaviors and ideologies almost seem irrelevant. But they are the most relevant of all. ...

Take the time to read the rest.\n\nHard as I've tried to rationalize how a U.S. president can be stuck on supporting a terrorist organization like the Muslim Brotherhood, I just can't think of an answer. Simon's piece comes about as close to answering that question as I think anyone can. As for John 'RINO' 'increasingly addle-brained' McCain ... Simon falls way short in explaining his lunacy.