The good folks at City Journalhave reposted a piece I wrote about Hollywood’s reaction to 9/11 – When Hollywood Hit Rock Bottom:

“When it comes to sheer shamefulness, the conformist “radicals” of Hollywood outdid themselves in the years after the Islamofascist attacks on 9/11. When the United States responded to these atrocities by attempting to destroy the terrorist staging grounds in Afghanistan and establish a beachhead of Middle Eastern democracy in Iraq, Hollywood reacted by churning out propaganda movies that could only demoralize our allies and bolster our low and savage enemies: Syriana, In the Valley of Elah, Rendition, Redacted, Lions for Lambs, Green Zone,Body of Lies, Stop Loss, and on and on. Many of these films portrayed our soldiers and intelligence officers as rapists, murderers, torturers, or noble fools manipulated by conniving Republicans. Not one of them (including the excellent HBO film Taking Chance and the flawed but powerful Hurt Locker, which at least showed our troops in a positive light) depicted the wars themselves as good or noble endeavors. BesidesChance and Locker, these films were bad and they were bombs, showing that ideology, not art or commerce, dictated their content. It was the dark mirror image of Hollywood’s patriotic response to Pearl Harbor in the 1940s, a living diagram of what the Left has wrought in our cultural lives since then.”

2 Comments, 2 Threads

1.
RES

I remain astonished that we have yet to see a movie about September 12th, when the grounding of planes nationwide left passengers stranded and eager to get home. Take a handful of stranded travelers, pool them to rent a van and drive it across the country and the opportunity to explore the various reactions to the event virtually writes itself. Sure, it might be the worst of cliched made-for-TV events, but I bet it would still be interesting to audiences. Yet we’ve seen nothing of its type. It’s almost as if Hollywood enjoys losing money.