Essay about Euthanasia and Life

﻿
Euthanasia: Is There a Duty to Die?
Before the coming of Christianity, attitudes toward active euthanasia and suicide had tended to be tolerant. As Christianity continued to spread, religion became a major factor in influencing the actions and beliefs of many people; the idea of hastening a human’s death through euthanasia or assisted suicide no longer seemed humane. In the late 1900s, organized action in favor of the legislation of euthanasia and assisted suicide were taken back into consideration. During this time euthanasia was considered a “mercy killing,” a bringing about death to a sufferer. However, this action initially focused on newborns and young children; with the lack of medical advancements and technologies it was difficult for a child’s body to fight off illnesses on their own without the proper medication. Today, euthanasia and physician –assisted suicide (PAS) is a worldwide social issue. The idea of “playing God” to relieve a person of their illness through these actions is an issue that is accompanied by a profuse amount of ethical concerns and questions that surround the legalization of these actions. Focusing on one of many ethical problems of euthanasia and PAS is questioning the right of an individual who has no hope of recovery. Who has the right to decide when and how to end their life? What effects does it play on the patient, their family, physician and/or caretaker?
Along with the aging of the population and progress in medicine, a significant number of terminally ill persons are maintained alive, regardless of the pain, suffering, depression, or other uncomfortable situations they undergo. Although there maybe terminally ill patients considering euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, these options are limited to a select few due to the legislation of these actions. The idea of hastening the death of terminally ill persons is illegal in almost all of the United States and some countries. The restricting legislation can put the patient and their family through often difficult times. As an illustration, when I was 15 years old, my Grandma was diagnosed with primary lung cancer; this is when cancer begins in the lungs and continues to spread if not treated. My Grandma resided in Mexico City, Mexico, making it difficult for my mom to fly down to visit and care for her mother. We would often receive calls from family members to keep us updated on her condition. My family and I would constantly pray for my Grandmother’s health, but despite our prayers her condition worsened. Slowly she began to lose her sight until she went completely blind, she lost motion in her legs, and lost her memory, my Grandma was no longer aware of who was in her presence. My family was cognizant of the fact that my Grandma was in a vegetative state and her life would soon come to an end. Despite the desire to hasten her death out of mercy, my family was unable to because of the legal issue physician-assisted suicide poses on other countries like Mexico, and most of the United States. For a patient who resides in locations where assisted suicide is legal, and meets all the requirements necessary for a physician to administer the action, it comes down to deciding between euthanasia or PAS. Is the final decision supported, argued against, or become biased based on the views of family, doctors, caretakers and/or others? Or should others also have the right to make the decision if the patient cannot manage it on their own? These concerns all reflect back to the ethical problems of a patient’s right in choosing how to end their life. The debate between euthanasia and PAS has continued throughout many years, creating more and more ethical concerns and questions; how and why is it that patients choose these pathways leading them to their dignified death, is it their decision or was their decision triggered by other factors; based on assembled information, each with a different perspective, and come to conclude the true reasons

Related Documents: Essay about Euthanasia and Life

Euthanasia
The purpose of this essay is to address the topic of euthanasia and if it should be permitted in cases of terminally ill patients. Euthanasia is when an ill person that can not be cured wishes to die with compassion to prevent that person from suffering. My key research points would be the meaning to the different types of euthanasia why people are disagree or agree with it, and examples of patients that want euthanasia and why. I hope to find information that agrees that

minor symptoms of chemo and cancer were left
unaddressed, leaving the impression that her life wasn't worth living.”
when a person is in so much pain and has given up hope of surviving and
want to end their own life that is when euthanasia should be administered.
In the case where family members are in pain watching their loved suffer
then the family should be able to euthanize the individual. These two cases
are the only time euthanasia should be administered.
A common question that

involving the right to die. Euthanasia involves moral and ethic issues which are very hard subjects to declare in court.
Most people that support euthanasia believe that assisted suicide and euthanasia should be one of the last resort options when facing a hard death. They would not ever tell a patient that it is the only way to not deal with the pain. It would only be offered to patients towards the end of life. There are also many doctors that believe it is cruel to not let nature take its

Commandments ("You hall love the Lord your God…"). At a more fundamental level, Ethics is the method by which we categorize our values and pursue them.
(“Medical ethics deal more specifically with the moral choices of taking certain actions to save or preserve life while following human rights protocol.”) - Collins Oxford Dictionary
3. Why is Euthanasia an ethical issue?
("No ethical questions are more timely more controversial than those involving human life") - Richard M. Doerflinger
The

Legalizing Euthanasia
While many people who live in the United States are living a happy and free life, others all around are fighting various illnesses, and diseases. They are approaching the end of their lives in an unfavorable manner. Examples may include enduring a terminal cancer, or someone who cannot function without a ventilator. Although some refer to it as “legalized murder”, euthanasia is something that is used to relieve one’s suffering and should be legal in the U.S

of the first advantages of having Euthanasia or PAS performed is the realization of autonomy. Autonomy is one of the key elements in this country, just knowing that you or anybody can have that option in your life can be satisfying, as long as there is reasonable evidence that can qualify you for it. Another benefit for euthanasia or PAS is that it can reduce or eliminate pain and suffering when going through a threatening disease. For instance, I have seen and heard many stories of how cancer

because the only person to decide if the patient continues to live is the patient themselves.
The modern definition of Euthanasia is defined as the painless killing of a suffering, incurable patient. Euthanasia used to be known as “easy death” and I believe that it should still be defined as this. Forcing an incurable patient to continue living a life they no longer want to live is completely immoral. If the patient has decided they do not want to suffer anymore, who are we to say that they must

individual who has had brain damage, or been in a coma, or otherwise cannot express or make the decisions for themselves. This is usually left to the decision of ones immediate family. Another form of euthanasia is passive, which is letting a person die by withholding life-sustaining treatment in order to produce a quicker death. Lastly and the most controversial is voluntary euthanasia. These are the instances in which a clearly competent individual makes a voluntary and enduring request to be

﻿Euthanasia
Euthanasia refers to the process of taking your own life medically to end pain or suffering. Euthanasia is legal in three countries, Belgium, Luxemburg and the Netherlands. Physician assisted suicides is a form of voluntary euthanasia, it is more controlled as the physician rules out cases of depression that could be clouding the thought pattern. They normally end their life by an overdose of medication or a lethal injection.
Euthanasia in Christianity
Most Christians believe

﻿Celeny Cruz
Professor Connell
English 1005
1 May 2014
Against Euthanasia
As she lies there, holding back her tears, the doctor says, “ There’s nothing we can do, I’m sorry.” But is there really nothing he can do? Ever since euthanasia was introduced, it seems as though doctors have stopped trying there best to save their patients. Even though people don’t want to live the pain, euthanasia should be illegal.
Euthanasia was first approved for people who are terminally ill and ask for it. Then

(Medew).
Broadbent opened the controversy on whether or not society should allow the elderly to commit
assisted suicide. Humans, as a whole, believe that all the great science and medical innovations
are able to cure all illnesses and relieve any pain known to man, but in reality, it will not happen.
If there is an elderly person too weak to pursue life functions without the use of a machine to
simply keep them breathing the option of euthanasia should be available for an option of peaceful

Words 915 - Pages 4

* Test names and other trademarks are the property of the respective trademark holders. None of the trademark holders are affiliated with this website.