> On 20 Jun., 19:46, "Julio Di Egidio" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote:> > "WM" <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message> >> > news:53221a87-3752-41f8-803c-e2a62337acde@g2g2000vbk.googlegroups.com...> >> > > On 20 Jun., 15:33, "Julio Di Egidio" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote:> > >> (E.g. did anybody study the latter construction [the L=[0,L]]? Does> > >> the "issue" exists at all,> >> > > This issue does not exist in any forum or journal where matheologians> > > are the dominating fraction.> >> > If that distinction has any merit, then it's hard to believe that nobody has> > looked into it yet. Anyway, if that is so, this "issue" might very well> > become the basis for my PhD thesis... so to speak.> > I would not recommend that. First, I have been publishing this> observation in many places for about 10 years now.

That you have been publishing it for so long with such negative results would send a message to a brighter poster.

Your posts to that effect, WM, are of use only as amusements to vast majority less monomaniacal that yourself.--