Monday, June 20, 2016

Newsletter published on 28 March 2016(1) Gaylib Backfiring: North Carolina bans Biological
Men from Women's bathrooms & locker rooms(2) There is more bullying
of Gays now than 50 yrs ago, because of Gaylib - Eric Walberg(3) Pervert
Sex Indoctrination a Gramscian strategy to destroy Western Civ - Ron
Corbyn

North Carolina legislators decided to rein in local
governments by approving a bill Wednesday that prevents cities and counties
from passing their own anti-discrimination rules. Gov. Pat McCrory later
signed the legislation, which dealt a blow to the LGBT movement after
success with protections in cities across the country.

The
Republican-controlled General Assembly took action after Charlotte city
leaders last month approved a broad anti-discrimination measure. Critics
focused on language in the ordinance that allowed transgender people to use
the restroom aligned with their gender identity.

McCrory, who was the
mayor of Charlotte for 14 years and had criticized the local ordinance,
signed the legislation Wednesday night that he said was "passed by a
bipartisan majority to stop this breach of basic privacy and
etiquette."

Although 12 House Democrats joined all Republicans present in
voting for the bill in the afternoon, later all Senate Democrats in
attendance walked off their chamber floor during the debate in protest.
Remaining Senate Republicans gave the legislation unanimous
approval.

"We choose not to participate in this farce," Senate Minority
Leader Dan Blue of Raleigh said after he left the chamber.

Senate
leader Phil Berger of Eden said the Democrats' decision to leave was a
"serious breach of their obligation to the citizens that voted to elect
them."

Republicans and their allies have said intervening is necessary to
protect the safety of women and children from "radical" action by
Charlotte. There have been arguments that any man — perhaps a sex
offender — could enter a woman's restroom or locker room simply by
calling himself transgender.

"It's common sense — biological men
should not me be in women's showers, locker rooms and bathrooms," said GOP
Rep. Dean Arp of Monroe before the chamber voted 82-26 for the legislation
after nearly three hours of debate.

Gay rights leaders and transgender
people said the legislation demonizes the community and espouses bogus
claims about increasing the risk of sexual assaults. They say the law will
deny lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people essential protections
needed to ensure they can get a hotel room, hail a taxi or dine at a
restaurant without fear.

"McCrory's reckless decision to sign this
appalling legislation into law is a direct attack on the rights, well-being
and dignity of hundreds of thousands of LGBT North Carolinians and visitors
to the state," Human Rights Campaign President Chad Griffin said in a
statement. Civil liberties groups pledged to push for repeal and were
weighing legal options. A Thursday evening rally was planned.

GOP
leaders scheduled the one-day session at the cost of $42,000 because
Charlotte's ordinance was set to take effect April 1. Otherwise, the
legislature wouldn't have returned until late April.

Current
Charlotte Mayor Jennifer Roberts, who pressed to get the anti-discrimination
ordinance approved, said she was appalled by the legislature's
actions.

"The General Assembly is on the wrong side of progress. It is on
the wrong side of history," Roberts said in a prepared statement. But
McCrory said in a release "the basic expectation of privacy in the most
personal of settings" was violated by "government overreach and
intrusion" by Roberts and the city council.

The law bars local
governments statewide from prohibiting discrimination in public places based
on sexual orientation and gender identity. A new statewide nondiscrimination
law included doesn't contain those specific protections. It directs all
public schools, government agencies and public college campuses to require
bathrooms or locker rooms be designated for use only by people based on
their biological sex. They can offer single-occupancy
facilities.

Transgender people who have transitioned to the opposite sex
wouldn't be affected if they get their birth certificate
changed.

Democrats said the measure makes North Carolina less inclusive
and interferes with local governments. They say the state could also risk
billions in federal education dollars with the school
policy.

Ordinance supporters and opponents spoke to legislators in House
and Senate committees. They included Skye Thompson, 15, of Greenville, who
was born female but now identifies as male. He told senators they were
putting him in danger by requiring use of a women's restroom.

"I've
dealt with bullying my whole life and now I worry that my own state
lawmakers are bullying me as well. I feel bullied by you guys," Thompson
said.

Donna Eaton of Cary said everybody deserves to be treated with
dignity and respect but is worried that without Wednesday's legislation
"it's going to open the door for people with malicious intent who would
masquerade as transgenders to come in and actually take advantage and
have access to our kids."

Legislation requiring transgender students
to use bathrooms corresponding with their birth gender have failed recently.
South Dakota's legislature failed to override Gov. Dennis Daugaard's veto
and a similar bill in Tennessee bill died Tuesday.

The new law also
would also make clear local governments can't require area businesses to pay
workers above the current minimum wage, with some exceptions. McCrory said
that although items beyond the bathroom-related provisions in the
legislation should have waited until later this spring for debate, he signed
it anyway because it doesn't change existing rights under state or federal
law.

>One lesson where students are asked
to role-play what it would be like to be same-sex attracted was considered
problematic for students "from conservative cultural groups" who might feel
isolated by the lesson.

>Openly gay Liberal senator Dean Smith said
he was pleased with theresponse and that it was a "very responsible decision
by the Government".

so the gay (right wing) liberal mp is defending the
censorship of the sex stuff, and the straight (left wing) labour mp is
criticizing it? it shows how meaningless the right/ left slots
are.

that corresponds to my experience here in toronto. i went to a play
intended to tour high schools, 'outside', about a gay being bullied in
high school and how some straight kids open a 'gay and straight
alliance' to stop such bullying. (he was a wimp.)

the subtext is
'force the entire school to watch something that affects 2.5%. also 'come
out' in high school.i listened to q&a and saw an intelligent man my age
who said he'd counselled kids. so i went to ask him about his experience. i
suspect there is more bullying of gay types now than 50 yrs ago, precisely
because of gaylib.i suggested the gay-straight alliance clubs are
counterproductive. that it is dangerous to open a gay pandora's box at high
schools. he made clear he was straight. he countered by saying 'if i were a
gay student, i'd like to go to a club like that just to see who
went.'uh, hu. me, i wouldn't be caught dead at one. what kind of counselling
is that?

the lesbian teacher-organizer even boasted that they showed
it to gr 6 students who loved it.sure, they're very impressionable, and
no doubt felt like adults were taking them seriously, regardless of the
content.the lesbian organizer overheard my discussion with the counsellor
and jumped in and told me 'this discussion doesn't belong here', with
daggers in her eyes. so i left.the play was well performed and well
written. it just shouldn't be used as propaganda in schools.

i like
your coalition mp Christensen >the program should be suspended because he
did not want to see young people "sexually liberated"."I don't want to see
sexual liberation of young people, I don't want to see young people
sexualised at all," he said.

Peter, you
probably already know that pervert sex indoctrination is just one of the
things the Frankfurt School Jews do to break down western civilization in
preparation for the communist New World Order. Google these articles/books
if you have not seen them: 1. "Cultural Communism/Marxism" (particularly
the article by William S. Lind) by the American Free Press (2002). 2.
"Prison Notebooks" by Antonio Gramsci, the darling of western university
social science and humanities departments, who said famously "The
destruction of Western Civilization will require a long march through its
institutions." 3. "45 Goals of Communism" placed by Albert Herlong, Fla.
congressman, in the Congressional Record (1963). It is reproduced in
Sklausen's "The Naked Communist" and by Henry Makow on his website.

I
might add that Herlong's list is an expansion of the communist goals set
forth by the Illuminati (1776) and later by Marx (1848). The reason for the
expansion is that Marx's prediction of a working class takeover of industry
during WWI failed, which was interpreted by communist Jew apologists as
meaning that the influence of Western Civilization (Christian for most of
its history) was still too strong and that it had to be systematically
destroyed.

About Me

'Mission statement'.
I am convinced that jewish individuals and groups have an enormous influence on the world. The MSM are, for almost all people, the only source of information, and these are largely controlled by jewish people.
So there is a huge under-reporting on jewish influence in the world.
I see it as my mission to try to close this gap. To quote Henry Ford: "Corral the 50 wealthiest jews and there will be no wars." `(Thomas Friedman wrote the same in Haaretz, about the war against Iraq! See yellow marked area, blog 573)
If that is true, my mission must be very beneficial to humanity.