If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by pikapika

Raymond was growling during the DP part, sounds like a lot of pain. Other than that, everyone got the chance to fuck and be fucking. (YAY) It is a good scene.

I have been a member of SC for years, probably 4 or 5, so you know I am loyal to the site. I've stayed with them through highs and lows as far as models and performance go. I enjoyed this update with Jordan, Jeffrey and Raymond.

I do have one peeve. I turned the sound off completely. The moaning and groaning rivaled bull alligators in mating season. Some people like it I guess, or SC wouldn't do it so much, but to me, it is a turn-off when it is obviously faked.

That said, keep putting out the vids and I'll keep watching, with the sound off.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by statsguy

I
I thought it was funny that in the nds promo clip Campbell couldn't remember the name of the web site he did the video for, and that they were faking that they had just finished the filming the video. Leaving both of those in the clip improved my opinion of nds.

I thought it was fun, too. They apparently shot the video they were referencing the day before they shot the BTS but couldn't pull of the dupe. I can't blame Campbell for not remembering the name, there are like ten of them. It surprises me (although it shouldn't) that a lot of these boys seem to struggle when they are attempting to call another model by his porn name. It's easy to forget that they think of each other by their real names only.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

i am considering gettting subscription to seancody so i can see all the videos from 2010/2011 that i only saw pictures of. im new at paying for porn i want to know, is it possible that they will ever send me things in the mail?

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by dman9924

I have been a member of SC for years, probably 4 or 5, so you know I am loyal to the site. I've stayed with them through highs and lows as far as models and performance go. I enjoyed this update with Jordan, Jeffrey and Raymond.

I do have one peeve. I turned the sound off completely. The moaning and groaning rivaled bull alligators in mating season. Some people like it I guess, or SC wouldn't do it so much, but to me, it is a turn-off when it is obviously faked.

That said, keep putting out the vids and I'll keep watching, with the sound off.

The fake moaning and groaning, especially during the fucking, on sc videos is probably the biggest negative of sc videos these days. Noisy sex is ok some of the time, but a constant diet of over the top, staged audio sucks. It's no surprise that these three are loud. Raymond and Jeffrey are two of sc's loudest bottoms. And they decided to make the same fake sounds when they top. I'll bet these boys go home and have perfectly normal sounding sex.

The moans and groans on sc videos has gradually gotten louder over the years. Like everything else that's part of the sc formula (quiet period after anyone cums, 4-6 sexual positions with no transitions between the positions, short opening interviews, and some good bts videos), once it's part of the sc formula it will never change. I wish sc would hire a couple of sets of directors to mix up the style and pace of their videos. Letting some of the guys have some directorial freedom was one of the things that breathed new life and variety into BA videos.

It's ironic that sc is willing to try bareback sex part of the time but they aren't willing to try realistic sounding quiet sex part of the time. I like sc, but sc should get rid of the fake moans and groans.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by Curiosity6969

i am considering gettting subscription to seancody so i can see all the videos from 2010/2011 that i only saw pictures of. im new at paying for porn i want to know, is it possible that they will ever send me things in the mail?

sc doesn't send you stuff in the mail. In four years of subscribing to sc I have never gotten anything in the mail from them. The amount will appear on your credit card bill and that's it. I think that the only reason sc even asks for an address is to process the credit card transactions.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by Ninja108

Matt didn't do a thing for me.

Matt was never my favorite sc model. Matt had a very nice body, a good dick, and did a good job of fucking. When I watch him in a video there isnít anything I can point to that he is doing wrong. But I never got a vibe that he was very interested in what he was doing, and for some reason I donít find him particularly hot. When Devon Hunter said that Matt readily admitted that he was poor at sucking dick (and had a problem with teeth), my opinion sunk a little more.

Pete, on the other hand, I like a lot. I prefer Pete V1, to the bulked up v2 Pete. In watching Matt fucks Pete I can see why I like Pete. He has passion and is constantly touching and pawing Matt, at least in the sexual positions where that is possible. He cums a bucket and outside the sex, normally has a mischievous smile on his face. I wonder how he came out in the body building competition for which he was training.
He was equality versatile. And very easy on the eyes. It's tough to complain about abs that look like this:

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Speaking of older models, I liked Doug, Pete, Harley, Kurt, Billy, Devin. From the new ones I like Pavel, Jarek, Curtis was wow! with Liev lately and there's always somebody worth looking at. They seem to go bareback, not that I care either way, but I would not like it to influence what models they can get.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

do porn stars from studio like sc actually make lot of money? wouldnt think they would make an amazing amount

Originally Posted by Ninja108

for the most part, most porn stars have other jobs. You're not going to become rich off porn for the most part if you're a worker.

According to some sources SC models are paid between $3000 and $5000 per scene depending their work and some have done nearly a dozen scenes during their stay. This can easily add up to 40 or 50 grand, which can go a long way for US standards.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Addison is definitely one of a kind.

An import from the United Kingdom, this 24-year-old is one of the wittiest and most charming models I've ever worked with. In the short time I've known him, I've been amazed at what he's been able to get away with.

The first night he was here a few of us took him out to dinner. A friend of mine was having difficulty getting some pepper. Addison threw his napkin over his forearm, went to the serving station, got a pepper cracker, and starting offering fresh pepper not only to our table, but to adjoining tables as well.

You'd think total strangers would be annoyed by something like that, but his British flair just made everything perfect.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Sorry about that. I've confused Matt and Fuller before, both have hot bodies and similar performance styles.

Originally Posted by PhunkSpunk

Addison is definitely one of a kind.

An import from the United Kingdom, this 24-year-old is one of the wittiest and most charming models I've ever worked with. In the short time I've known him, I've been amazed at what he's been able to get away with.

But not always. It's sad to think that someone had so little value for someone else's life.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

I'll say this too. I'm sure most of us have heard about the Active Duty tattoo scandal by now. That theme can also apply here.
Having someone with racist tattoos is bad in its own right but having someone who admitted to cold blooded murder still on your site ranks right up there as well.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Question for discussion: Pierce was introduced on December 19th. Bareback began at Christmas. There has not been a new model in an action video since Pierce. Does anyone think that, perhaps, the introduction of bareback has resulted in models not making the jump into action?

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

does anyone else think that sex with a condom is just hotter? it's cleaner and putting your dick in a hole that poo comes out of, willingly, seems odd. i would barely think putting your dick in a vagina (which it's "meant" to go in, that's how we're built) is even a little gross. i would use a condom unless i was trying to have a child with someone.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by Curiosity6969

does anyone else think that sex with a condom is just hotter? it's cleaner and putting your dick in a hole that poo comes out of, willingly, seems odd. i would barely think putting your dick in a vagina (which it's "meant" to go in, that's how we're built) is even a little gross. i would use a condom unless i was trying to have a child with someone.

You don't think urine, blood and newborn children are a little gross?

It's all a matter of how clean you and your partner are, the rest is health awareness.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by cirderf13

Question for discussion: Pierce was introduced on December 19th. Bareback began at Christmas. There has not been a new model in an action video since Pierce. Does anyone think that, perhaps, the introduction of bareback has resulted in models not making the jump into action?

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by Curiosity6969

does anyone else think that sex with a condom is just hotter? it's cleaner and putting your dick in a hole that poo comes out of, willingly, seems odd. i would barely think putting your dick in a vagina (which it's "meant" to go in, that's how we're built) is even a little gross. i would use a condom unless i was trying to have a child with someone.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by Curiosity6969

does anyone else think that sex with a condom is just hotter? it's cleaner and putting your dick in a hole that poo comes out of, willingly, seems odd. i would barely think putting your dick in a vagina (which it's "meant" to go in, that's how we're built) is even a little gross. i would use a condom unless i was trying to have a child with someone.

Well good for you!

You realize that you are parroting the right-wing/religious arguments against sodomy, i.e. this was made to go in that. And it probably was, only most people, straights included, don't fuck with the considered intention of making a baby: they fuck because it's a lot of fun.

The only reason why gays should where condoms is for the prevention of disease. And that's a damned good reason, IMHO.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

i meant to say i also think putting your dick in a vagina is gross, and would only do it condom-free if i was intending to have a child. i cant see why people enjoy fucking someone without one, especially in the asshole. you are slightly desensitized with one on but not a heap.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by Curiosity6969

does anyone else think that sex with a condom is just hotter? it's cleaner and putting your dick in a hole that poo comes out of, willingly, seems odd. i would barely think putting your dick in a vagina (which it's "meant" to go in, that's how we're built) is even a little gross. i would use a condom unless i was trying to have a child with someone.

Curiosity - we GET that you don't like/condone barebacking, OK? But this is the Sean Cody thread and most, if not all, of us are here to read/discuss Sean Cody-related issues, which doesn't include barebacking in general...

If you want to go proselytize your pro-condom position in general - please , please, please find another thread or create your own.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by cirderf13

Question for discussion: Pierce was introduced on December 19th. Bareback began at Christmas. There has not been a new model in an action video since Pierce. Does anyone think that, perhaps, the introduction of bareback has resulted in models not making the jump into action?

You have to remember that there is often a considerable time gap between when a scene is shot and when the site puts it up for viewing. I don't know what SC's is, but on other sites, 3 months is not uncommon... For all we know, most of the recent solos could have been shot before the BB stuff first aired and the SC site was keeping quiet about its decision to go BB. So, given that it's only been 6 weeks since the first BB scene (and not ALL the subsequent 'action scenes' have been bareback), I think it's way too early to jump to any conclusions like that.

Models are all going to have their own personal limits to what they will/will not do on a porn site and I don't doubt that asking a model to do a condomless scene will probably 'weed out' some newer models, but ALL of them? It's way too early to tell. Bring this topic back in 3-4 months, and we should have a better idea...

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by calvar

Curiosity - we GET that you don't like/condone barebacking, OK? But this is the Sean Cody thread and most, if not all, of us are here to read/discuss Sean Cody-related issues, which doesn't include barebacking in general...

If you want to go proselytize your pro-condom position in general - please , please, please find another thread or create your own.

Thank you

i can do what i want. please stop dictating me, mind your own fucking business. bb is an issue at the moment in sc therefore i can discuss it. since i am discussing bb in the sc thread it is not "general" bb discussion, anything i say has to do with sc, i just dont need to say that in every post i am relating to sc, it's a given when i post in this thread.

if i say in this thread i find it odd taht others think bb is hot, that's an obvious allusion to how sc is bb now and people find it hot. use your head.

if you don't agree or like what i say about sc going bb, IGNORE IT. this is the internet, you don't even have to read my posts. the last thing you shoudl be doing is telling someone to take their relevant discussion elsewhere.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

SC has released their last video for January 2012. In Jan, sc released fifteen videos, including seven solos and eight with guy-guy action. Of the guy-guy action videos, three are three ways, and six are bb. sc has really settled on a particular body type. Of the guys in the guy-guy videos, they're all muscular and buffed - good abs, shoulders, and above average sized dicks on all of them. There's a bit more variety of body types in the solo guys, but not much. I may have some complaints about sc, but good bodies is not one of them. When you add sc's Christmas video (Brandon and Pierce), a sc subscription is looking like a good value these days.

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

sc has filed two lawsuits to get the names of 122 people that shared (and downloaded) sc's Brandon fucks Pierce video via bittorrent, with damages of $150,000 per person that shared the video. For more information, see:

Re: Sean Cody Update - 2012

Originally Posted by Curiosity6969

does anyone else think that sex with a condom is just hotter? it's cleaner and putting your dick in a hole that poo comes out of, willingly, seems odd. i would barely think putting your dick in a vagina (which it's "meant" to go in, that's how we're built) is even a little gross. i would use a condom unless i was trying to have a child with someone.

Personally, no. Although I don't have sex without a condom and would strongly advise against bareback sex, I do not condone telling people what they can and can't do with another consenting adult.

Porn is fantasy. It requires a certain amount of suspension of disbelief to do anything for you.

Something comes out of every hole. If you start thinking about it you'll never have intercourse with anyone.