If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You will have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Re: Index to Fancomics: UPDATED

Originally Posted by Neoriceisgood

Don't forget

Awesome

Which is an important tag as well.

That is a subjective tag in most cases, however.

For example, while there is probably no debate over the awesomeness of YOUR comic, there are some comics that have gotten good reviews I would have to disagree with. In The Playground, for example. People only like it because of the promise of their characters in it. In my opinion, it's not that good. Not at updating, nor humour, nor story. More people post and beg for it to start again as there should be.

Elrond, I hope you're not reading this, but if you are I apologize for my hateful insults.

Re: Index to Fancomics: UPDATED

Originally Posted by The Q

That is a subjective tag in most cases, however.

For example, while there is probably no debate over the awesomeness of YOUR comic, there are some comics that have gotten good reviews I would have to disagree with. In The Playground, for example. People only like it because of the promise of their characters in it. In my opinion, it's not that good. Not at updating, nor humour, nor story. More people post and beg for it to start again as there should be.

Elrond, I hope you're not reading this, but if you are I apologize for my hateful insults.

Re: Index to Fancomics: UPDATED

Originally Posted by The Q

That is a subjective tag in most cases, however.

For example, while there is probably no debate over the awesomeness of YOUR comic, there are some comics that have gotten good reviews I would have to disagree with. In The Playground, for example. People only like it because of the promise of their characters in it. In my opinion, it's not that good. Not at updating, nor humour, nor story. More people post and beg for it to start again as there should be.

Elrond, I hope you're not reading this, but if you are I apologize for my hateful insults.

Re: Index to Fancomics: UPDATED

I was thinking about doing something like that, once. Only I figured it probably wouldn't be a good idea.

I mean, you're an artist, would you really want me saying why all your hard work sucks and how people shouldn't like it as much as they do?

Plus, that might get me an infraction.

I could probably try it in a way that wouldn't be so critical, but I should at least get better at doing artwork first.

...Unless I could get an artist.....

Any volenteers?

How about you instead have a list of comic makers who sign-up for a review on their webcomic and what they want you to review on. (i.e. Artwork, story, etc.) That way, the mods can't infract you because the artists gave consent. Plus, you should critique on instead of what's bad, on what needs improvement on, and offer suggestions.

Re: Index to Fancomics: UPDATED

Originally Posted by Silverraptor

How about you instead have a list of comic makers who sign-up for a review on their webcomic and what they want you to review on. (i.e. Artwork, story, etc.) That way, the mods can't infract you because the artists gave consent. Plus, you should critique on instead of what's bad, on what needs improvement on, and offer suggestions.

Does that work?

I agree with this. If you make constructive critics instead of offensive ones you will be fine.

by the way...
I've edited all my posts on the last index thread to:

>>>>>Please read the last post<<<<<

Thanks.

Would be awesome if you guys could do the same. The last post is pointing towards this thread.

Re: Index to Fancomics: UPDATED

Originally Posted by MethosHazara

Style

Also... Can you please put Reality on hiatus? I won't update it until Oct 16

Will do.

Hey, and if we really are going to do the whole "READ THE LAST POST" thing, we should probably get Q to do it, too. He has the most posts on there. (Like, more than half of the posts on that thread are Q's.)

Re: Index to Fancomics: UPDATED

Originally Posted by Silverraptor

How about you instead have a list of comic makers who sign-up for a review on their webcomic and what they want you to review on. (i.e. Artwork, story, etc.) That way, the mods can't infract you because the artists gave consent. Plus, you should critique on instead of what's bad, on what needs improvement on, and offer suggestions.

Does that work?

It could work. Only problem is that it would be BORING. Boring to read and boring to write. Nobody wants to read a friendly, sane critic! And I wanna insult everybody!

And I would still need an artist, because I'm still not completely skilled with my new program and I don't have a lot of time on my hands.

If I got a willing artist, I'd give it a try anyway. It could be good and fun.

Re: Index to Fancomics: UPDATED

Hey, what does it take to be Active again? The Shadowstone gang just put out a new comic...

There are 011 types of people in this world. People who understand binary, people who don't, and people who tend to read it backwards.90% of all statistics are made up. Put this in your sig if you make up statistics.

Re: Index to Fancomics: UPDATED

I thought I could help out with the first post, putting everything in alphabetical order, spellchecking, adding new webcomics, modifying a bit of text to reflect the purpose of the thread a bit better...just quote this post, and copy everything that is between the spoiler tags. Replace your first post with what you copied.

Spoiler

Show

Since the stickied list never gets updated, I thought I'd start my own.

Post below if I missed one or if you want your newly created webcomic to be added to the index.

If you have suggestions on how to make this list better, dont be shy and post them

Here's the color code:---Active---Inactive---Finished (like My name is Q)---Moved (When a thread gets too full and a new one has been created. Best example: ABR)---On Hiatus (when the author posts that he is on a hiatus)

Make sure to tell me if the status of a webcomic is wrong/has changed.