The #StolenReferendum. How Cameron & Co have ruthlessly exploited the murder of MP Jo Cox to save their skins and the EU ‘Project’

Britain’s vote on Europe looks set to go down in history as the ‘Stolen Referendum’. As the Remain campaign’s ruthless exploitation of the appalling murder of MP Jo Cox continues, big business, banks and other Remain enthusiasts are increasingly confident of coming out on top in Thursday’s historic poll.

Yet such a victory will have been bought at a terrible price – a blatant triple fraud against the democratic process, perpetrated with the enthusiastic support and involvement of all three leaders of the UK’s old established governing political parties and of the overwhelmingly dominant political force in Scotland.

The damage such a consensus for deceit and election rigging will do to faith in the democratic process is incalculable.

The first great Establishment electoral fraud in the now terminally polluted campaign was in place even before the sorry farce began: In a shameless re-run of the corruption that discredited the UK’s first In/Out referendum, in 1975, the contest was drastically skewed by the fact that every household received two documents in favour of EU membership (one from the Government and one from the Europhile campaign) compared to just one from the campaign for independence.

This disparity was then reinforced by the fact that massive funding from big business meant that the pro-Brussels side was able to outspend the antis on a massive scale. In 1975, the spending disparity in favour of remain was 11 to 1; there is no reason to suppose that the gap will be any less obscene this time around.

This propaganda imbalance on its own is enough to corrupt the contest and to deny a ‘Remain’ win any real democratic legitimacy, but as the campaign got under way and polls began to show that it was not going to be the expected Remain walkover, a second trick was brought into play in the effort to ensure the ‘correct’ result:

This was the decision of the Prime Minister to extend the deadline for voter registration by a whole 48 hours after the suspiciously convenient ‘crash’ of the online registration site, just two hours before the deadline to apply for a vote.

No explanation was given as to why the lost two hours should lead to 48 hours of extra time, but it was seized on by the various taxpayer-funded organisations that were already working to maximise voter registration among the demographic groups regarded as being most likely to vote Remain, particularly ethnic minorities (Operation Black Vote) and students (HopeNotHate). The extra time saw a staggering 430,000 additional applications to vote.

This would be more than enough to swing a close contest and the very fact that it was even thought acceptable speaks volumes for the ‘win at any costs’ mentality of Cameron and Remain.

Perhaps the best way to grasp the fundamental corruption of the entire extra voters registration drive is to imagine that it had been undertaken in Northern Ireland in the 1960s, with the notorious ‘Orange Ascendancy’ regime using taxpayers’ money to fund a campaign to sign up new voters which operated only in Protestant areas.

Had such a disgraceful affront to democracy been undertaken, the left to this day would – rightly – hold it up as an example of loyalist electoral practice, of discrimination against the Catholic community and as one of the factors that turned nationalists in the Province to abandon the democratic road and turn to terrorism.

As it happens, by the start of the final week of the campaign, a succession of opinion polls, backed up by worried articles in all the pro-Remain newspapers, indicated that, despite the first two frauds, the Leavers were on course for a remarkable, perhaps even crushing, victory.

And then one of the youngest and prettiest MPs campaigning for Remain was murdered in her constituency.

Over the course of the months and years ahead, it is inevitable that a plethora of conspiracy theories will grow up around this tragic event, the CIA’s Mkultra experiments and parallels with the fictional Manchurian Candidate being the most likely to gain traction and lead to even more cynicism about the democratic process in general and the referendum result in particular.

But no such speculation is in fact required for the murder of Jo Cox or, rather, the reaction to it of Remain and of the pro-Remain broadcast media, to be the third fraud against the electorate which will lead in due course to the whole contest being discredited as the ‘Stolen Referendum’.

Future conspiracy theories notwithstanding, in the light of any fresh evidence the simplest explanation of the murder is that Thomas Mair was either genuinely mentally ill or a political fanatic who despaired of the possibility of change through the democratic or legal process.

The latter is entirely possible and, given the relentless fraud, marginalisation and demonisation directed by the entire political and media establishment against opponents of the multi-cultural project to ‘remake’ Britain, it really should not surprise its authors if their totalitarian liberalism has begun to produce a terrorist backlash among those who have lost out most from globalisation and the multicultural Utopia.

This is true whether Mair was a ‘lone wolf’ or even part of a bigger ‘right-wing extremist conspiracy’: The evil is both a reflection and an unintended consequence of the long campaign to use mass immigration to transform Britain, and especially of the Blair regime’s conscious and deliberate aim to import millions more migrants in order both to it impossible for opponents of the change to win future elections. When Labour set out to “rub their noses in it”, they should perhaps have expected to get bitten.

When Northern Ireland’s Unionists denied working class Catholics realistic hope of change through the ballot box, they unwittingly contributed to the rise of the IRA and thirty years of terrorism. Why would denying alienated working class communities in multi-cultural England realistic hope that their fears would be listened to and their aspirations met, have any different effect?

Whatever Mair’s motivation, the murder of Jo Cox has been – and continues to be – ruthlessly used to corrupt the referendum result beyond redemption. This has nothing to do with Mair and is no reflection on Jo Cox herself, but it does reflect, very badly, on Britain’s Prime Minister, the leader of the Opposition and on almost the entire Remain campaign.

The murder was used in a ‘shock and awe’ propaganda campaign by Remain and its media allies, who took the natural revulsion of all decent people against the killing and added in wave after wave of utterly unfounded allegations and insinuations that the murder was in some way the result of the Leave campaign ‘encouraging division and hatred’.

The elite’s ‘blanket guilt’ approach in this case stands in stark contrast to their opinion when Wahhabi terrorists carry out one of their all too common atrocities, in which case the liberal (including Cameron) response ranges from the increasingly absurd “nothing to do with Islam” to the slightly more nuanced “you can’t blame all Muslims for the action of a few extremists”, invariably rolled out with the help of a gaggle of ‘moderate Imams’ who duly condemn the Jihadis and assure the world that they “do not act in our name” and are in fact “anti-Islamic”.

No such treatment for Brexiteers, of course. The total exclusion of notable Leave campaigners from the TV news interviews, producing the impression that they were either in some way guilty or – almost as bad – simply didn’t care, was particularly outrageous and effective.

Meanwhile, an endless queue of Europhile bien pensants chattered angrily on TV, radio and in newspaper columns about how the murder was supposedly connected to a ‘tone’ of division and hatred created by the Leave campaign.

Here, for example, is Jonathan Freedland:

“And throughout this campaign, there has been a drumbeat denouncing ‘the Westminster elite’, castigating all politicians, along with anyone in authority or in a public position of expertise, as either a liar or the corrupt dupe of a wicked Brussels conspiracy.

“Perhaps this had nothing to do with the cruelty that deprived two children of their mother yesterday. Maybe it’s a coincidence that the killer struck at this moment. Maybe it’s a coincidence that he targeted an MP who was a passionate advocate of remaining inside the EU, and whose signature issue had been a campaign to admit Syrians in desperate need of refuge.

“Maybe it’s a coincidence that she was a member of a political class that has been reviled for years and with heightened fervour in recent weeks. Maybe it’s a coincidence that she was an advocate for a position depicted by its most fevered opponents as unpatriotic and verging on treason.”

You see! Brexit campaigners accuse Remainers of ‘treason’ and two innocent children lose their mother. Now you have to vote Remain!

Polly Toynbee was even more blatant, actually blaming some Leave campaigners (and specifically, Nigel Farage, the politician whose success forced David Cameron to grant the referendum in the first place) for creating the ‘mood’ which led to the killing:

“There are many decent people involved in the campaign to secure Britain’s withdrawal from the EU, many who respect the referendum as the exercise in democracy that it is. But there are others whose recklessness has been open and shocking. I believe they bear responsibility, not for the attack itself, but for the current mood: for the inflammatory language, for the finger-jabbing, the dogwhistling and the overt racism.

“It’s been part of a noxious brew, with a dangerous anti-politics and anti-MP stereotypes fomented by Leave and their media backers mixed in. Only an hour before this shooting Nigel Farage unveiled a huge poster showing Syrian refugees fleeing to Slovenia last year.”

Operation Fear– the effort to frighten voters into backing Remain – had clearly been a dismal failure, so Cameron and other key Remain figures seized eagerly on the even more cynical opportunity to exploit the tragic death of Jo Cox – Operation Grief and Smear.

While journalists and TV news editors were left to do the bulk of the actual name calling dirty work, Cameron himself set about manipulating public emotions, speaking of the need to “drive out division and hatred” and blatantly using the dead Labour MP’s name and opinions in the desperate drive to save his own skin from the career-crushing referendum disaster that had, according to insider reports, reduced Number 10 to “panic” just two days earlier.

Nor was it just about Cameron. Will Straw, executive director of Britain Stronger in Europe, the cross-party group campaigning for Remain, showed equal bad taste in plugging this logo (no direct mention of Jo Cox but the broken heart image needed no explanation) all over social media the weekend after the murder.

Remain’s despicable and extremely undemocratic exploitation of the murder even went as far as to using it to steal an extra day of full-pelt campaigning. Immediately after Jeremy Corbyn (who had no scruples about terrorist killings when they were carried out by his friends in IRA/Sinn Fein) announced that Parliament would be recalled on the last Monday of the campaign, it was widely reported that the campaign was also on hold for Friday and Saturday with “limited campaigning on Sunday.” Terrified of being accused of being heartless, insensitive and so on, Leave duly wound down even their Sunday efforts to a minimum, only to see Remain restart their nationwide campaign on Sunday at full throttle.

Quite apart from the propaganda/moral blackmail aspect of Project Grief and Smear, the murder also thus served to break the organisational momentum of the entire Leave campaign not just on the Thursday of the killing but also on Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Monday.

Of course, the murder was such that it was right that it should have some impact on the campaign. The day of reflection on Friday quite possibly reflected the public mood and the humanity of all concerned on both sides of the debate.

But for the Remain camp – who had visibly been losing support every day of the previous week – to use the tragedy as the excuse to impose by moral blackmail a unilateral declaration of a five-days-out-of-seven ceasefire, was a deliberate move to steal from the British people their right to keep listening and to keep making up their minds according to the dynamics of a proper campaign, rather than according to the utterly irrational dictates of a manipulated GriefFest.

That this was political manoeuvring rather than the normal procedure in the event of the murder of an MP can be seen by contrasting the treatment of the murder of young mother of two Jo Cox to the even more dramatic murder of Conservative MP, WW2 hero and father of three Airey Neave by an IRA splinter group who blew up his car in the House of Commons car park in 1979.

Neave had won the Military Cross for being the first British officer to escape from the high security Nazi prison camp Colditz. Rejoining the struggle against fascism,Neave fought his way across Europe after D-Day, ending the war as a Major.[Ron: Yabba, yabba, subtle German bashing, yabba.].

Airey Neave died in hospital an hour after the INLA bomb blew off both his legs. This was two days after the vote of no confidence which brought down Callaghan’s government and a few weeks before the 1979 general election, for which campaigning was already under way, although Parliament had not yet been dissolved.

Returning for a moment to the question of conspiracy theories, Enoch Powell claimed in an interview with The Guardian on 9 January 1984 that the Americans had killed Neave. He said that the evidence came from a member of the Royal Ulster Constabulary with whom he had spoken.

On 18 October 1986 Powell returned to the subject of Neave’s death in a speech to Conservative students in Birmingham. He told them that INLA had not killed Neave, but that he had been assassinated by “MI6 and their friends”. Powell noted that Neave’s Northern Ireland policy had been one of integration with the rest of the UK and said that the Americans feared that this process, if implemented by Neave, would have been irreversible.

With the Tories ten points ahead in the opinion polls, Thatcher’s victory was almost certain. So Neave was on course become Northern Ireland Secretary and to put an immediate end to the security services’ ‘kid gloves’ handling of Republican terrorism. His killing, alleged Powell, was intended to make the British Government adopt a policy more acceptable to America in her aim of a united Ireland within NATO. That U.S. aim at least is a well-documented fact, as is the decades’-long CIA effort to include Britain in a ‘United Europe’.

Be that as it may, the key point here is that the terrorist murder of the war hero Airey Neave on a Friday afternoon, within the supposedly impregnable Palace of Westminster, where a number of MPs had been shaken by seeing him mutilated and dying, led to the suspension of normal Parliamentary business the following Monday for just 15 minutes to allow colleagues to pay tribute before they returned to their normal parliamentary and political work.

The contrast to the response to the murder of Jo Cox could not be clearer, even without the final ‘commemoration vigil’ for Jo Cox organised for the eve of poll to complete Operation Grief and Smear and to overshadow and discredit anything that Leave might produce as their final effort.

Whereas the first two great frauds connected with Britain’s Brexit referendum appeared set to fail, it is now virtually certain that – barring some dramatic external event such as an ISIS spectacular involving some of Merkel’s ‘refugees’ – the third one, the shameless exploitation of the murder of Jo Cox, will do the job.

What looked like being an explosion of popular anger which would see Great Britain leave the European Union, setting off a chain reaction which could very conceivably have brought the whole Project crashing down, is now going to be a damp squib vote to Remain.

The emotional spasm that is set to rob the Leave camp of what would have been a famous victory will quickly pass, but the fatal damage will have been done. Not just to the last chance for Britain to regain her freedom and for the other captive nations of Washington’s puppet ‘Europe’ to do the same, but also to what little survived of British faith in the democratic system and the reputation of the political and media elite.

Once the Remainers have finished crowing, and the professional mourners at poor, misguided Jo Cox’s funeral have dried their crocodile tears, all that will be left is the bitterness and growing anger of the hundreds of thousands of campaigners and the millions of voters who will understand that they and their beloved nation have been robbed.

The political crooks who masterminded and carried out that robbery may think they have been very clever, but one wonders whether they will be so happy when, in due course, the unintended consequences of their Stolen Referendum come home, more like vultures than chickens, to roost.

85 Comments

In her honor, neo-Nazism should be condemned in Ukraine by the British government. The US and the west should stop supporting the neo-nazis in Ukraine. The use of extremists – neo-nazis in Ukraine or Islamic in the middle east – by the west for its geo-interests should be condemned. All these three things would honor her more than anything else.

Why should anyone honour her specially??? She was just another person murdered – just like camoron is responsible for the murders in the Donbass, & Libya, and Syria etc. Also, she was against Assad, and in favour of the Yank Government and camoron and their deliberate support of ISIS etc, so really, I see no real loss in her death.

“””””Of course, thousands die every day in the middle east, and she was campaigning against BREXIT and even played a role in Syrian politics (and potentially made herself co-guilty). Hoewever, it is a terrible event and this time there is a dead body, of a mother and wife (((((“””””

They do… only they’re devoid of a voice, they have no voice whatsoever. No News guy is interviewing them [although they do get occasionally through the filters on Talk Radio, but who the hell listens to radio nowadays?!], and when they get online to bent their frustration… well…

News papers across the land are heavily censoring comments all over the freaking place. All you’re allowed to read on this particular subject is… oh! poor Saint Jo and her two very young children, and her (*accused of sexually abusing/harassing women at his last job at a charity… but you’re not supposed to mention that, of course) deeply grieving husband. Daw!!!! *sad-face*

In any case, if you wanna see how people feel, here’s this article (you can skip right to the comments, if you wish)

Haha, sounds like the situation in Nazi-Z-US occupied so called “Germany”. I mean, really every detail could be written by me or anyone else with open eyes here.

Tnx for the dailymail link, from time to time I come across british newspapers and notice this every time in the comments section. In Austria it’s the same, so it is in Australia. The entire world has been taken over.

For example, here is one randomly chosen comment and it *even* still appears at the *top*. Dammit, that would *not* happen in Z-US “Germany”, believe me. They have staff which writes the wished for comments and they get magically upvoted to the top. I gave up trying to register and comment in 2014, which was the final turning point. No chance to get anything reasonable published! Such a comment like the following would never go online in Germany:

“””””Rosalba, norwich, United Kingdom, about 10 hours ago

She didn’t deserve to die, but neither should her death be used for political capital. Remember what happened in Sweden when something similar happened just before an important vote? Emotion and mass hysteria took over, overturning the expected vote. Please watch “Brexit; The Movie” on Youtube before voting.”””””

There you see the difference and be sure that this will not stay like this: Not german’s freedom of speech will go up to your levels but yours will get down to Nazi-Z-german levels!

Whatever-ever: Maybe we should instead be *happy* that UK and EU stay under the same filth’s control. Because otherwise we die a little sooner. If the city is no longer involved in the EU to play their speculation games freely across all EU-countries, they would create a *big* war in Europe *soon* as they did every time for centuries. As ZeroHedge says: “On a long enough timeline the survival rate for everyone drops to zero …”

I mentioned that it is ironic that the British plays up the neo-Nazism or right wing thoughts of the killer. Yet, Britain and the US put in power murderous neo-nazis in power of a large country in Europe. The neo-nazis in US led Ukraine have killed thousands of civilians in Ukraine in the Eastern part and dissenters everywhere in Ukraine.

Here are some comments made by her (you can look up what other things she said here: https://hansard.parliament.uk/search/MemberContributions?memberId=4375&type=Spoken)‘…does the Minister agree that it is the Syrian authorities who are primarily responsible for these horrific ongoing abuses, continuing their long-standing policy of targeting civilians in rebel-held areas? Does he also agree that we now urgently need a mechanism, with clear consequences, to deter further barbaric attacks on civilians?

What is the UK doing to work with all those with an influence over parties to the conflict, including Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iran and Russia, to put pressure on all sides to stop all attacks on civilian targets, including hospitals? Does the Minister have evidence that Russian forces have been directly involved in the latest air strikes? If they were, does he agree that is it surely time for fresh sanctions against Russia?

While I am a huge fan of President Obama—indeed, I worked for him in North Carolina in 2008—I believe that both he and the Prime Minister made the biggest misjudgment of their time in office when they put Syria on the “too difficult” pile and, instead of engaging fully, ​withdrew and put their faith in a policy of containment…I do not believe that either President Obama or the Prime Minister tried to do harm in Syria…’

& this: ‘Secondly, is the UK joining efforts led by France for urgent action in the ISSG on the growing reports of violations of the cessation agreement by Assad and by Russia? Indeed, will the Minister address how it is even conceivable that the monitoring of the agreement is being jointly conducted by Russia, the same party that is responsible for the vast majority of recent civilian deaths? If the reports of Russian and regime violations are verified, what measures will the UK pursue to force a change in the calculations of both Putin and Assad? The UK has a critical role to play in giving everybody confidence in this system, in particular that the violations will be called out and the agreement protected. Are the Government considering, for example, further targeted sanctions against Russian entities in the event of further violations?’ – https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-01/debates/16030133000001/Syria#contribution-16030133000211

Thanks for the excerpts, which tell a lot about the deceased. I know I’m going against the flow (of tears too) but she deserved her comeuppance and hope any one of the murderous cabal that have caused millions of deaths and mayhem for the Azion Empire meet the same end soon. She was one of them – she even proudly proclaimed serving Evil No.1 – and if she was being groomed for leadership, even better dead now than later. I’m sorry for her children though… for having had such mother.

I am going to be voting OUT/leave, to kick camoron in the b***s. camoron is an out and out TRAITOR & LIAR, he – like bliar – was put into power by jews, and he is a jew too, who also wants Turkey in the EU, despite the lies he says to the contrary. Here you can see how the British embassy in ankara PROVES it: https://www.gov.uk/government/world/organisations/british-embassy-ankara ‘We work on…Turkey’s bid to join the European Union.’ And, it’s what he said in his mid-term report: ”We have kept EU enlargement on track – for example through the accession of Croatia, planned for July 2013, and the opening of accession negotiations with Montenegro – and are pushing for further progress in Turkey’s accession process.’

Democracy has been dead for quite some time. The statements in this article also mirror the electorate process here in the U.S. I have worked as an election inspector and have run for political office myself. The corruption and deceit conducted by higher ups in both political parties just leaves one breathless. I call the the US, the Fourth World, in a class by itself. A combination of the First and Third World. A First World in living standard. A Third World in its political and civil conduct.

One more “proof” of what I’ve said over and over again,and say again. Political and social change comes from the “barrel of a gun” (to quote Mao’s wisdom about revolution) ,not the ballot box. It may be “legalized” at the end by the ballot box. But it never starts there. Those that think they can accomplish it that way only fool themselves. It has never been accomplished that way and I doubt ever will. Especially in a modern society where elite power is so strong.History is replete with the failures of those who thought they could “bring chance” peacefully.Even those few movements thought to have brought change “peacefully”,are really seen during the run-up to that change to have had moments of violence that were defining moments that spurred that change.It always disappoints and saddens me to see ” the people” always ready to “fool themselves” over and over again “hoping and praying” that “this time”,unlike the countless other’s will be “different”. Only to see their hopes and prayers crushed and unanswered (unless you count a “no” as the answer to those prayers).So in finish,yes the elite will almost certainly get their “remain vote”. It will probably,at best,be like Scotland’s fake vote. With a 5% (at least) win for “remain”.Cameron and the EU will announce it a “great victory” for a “United Europe”. And they will plot for ways to make sure no one can try that again.

if the “people’ do not start a revolution (having armed themselves), they will not be able to escape the slavery that awaits them, in any part of the world. And Russia and China, using their “soft power” should help them get the arms…we the people are in the hands of a brutal international bankers mafia who would not stop at anything to advance their agenda. I do not see many wall street people gunned down, or corrupted politicians, while I see many common fathers, mothers, children, elderly brutalized, abused, tortured in any part of the world. Protests do not pay anymore….the taking again of the Bastille probably…

“Yet such a victory will have been bought at a terrible price – a blatant triple fraud against the democratic process…”

I am sure that will only make them all the happier. I recall reading, in a book about WW2, how Hitler meant something slightly “different” when he used the German word “klug”. Normally, “klug” simply means “clever”, but this author observed that Hitler tended to use it in the sense of “street-smart”, “sly”, or “devious” – all qualities of which he heartily approved in his own subordinates. To be called “klug” by Hitler meant that you were the sort of likely lad who was probably destined for the top of the Nazi hierarchy, leaving a trail of death, betrayal and treachery behind you. [Ron: Yabba, yabba, Judaic German bashing bullshit propaganda, yabba.].

There seem to be quite a lot of people of that kind in political and business leadership nowadays.

“Yet such a victory will have been bought at a terrible price – a blatant triple fraud against the democratic process…”

I am sure that will only make them all the happier. I recall reading, in a book about WW2, how Hitler meant something slightly “different” when he used the German word “klug”. Normally, “klug” simply means “clever”, but this author observed that Hitler tended to use it in the sense of “street-smart”, “sly”, or “devious” – all qualities of which he heartily approved in his own subordinates. To be called “klug” by Hitler meant that you were the sort of likely lad who was probably destined for the top of the Nazi hierarchy, leaving a trail of death, betrayal and treachery behind you.

There seem to be quite a lot of people of that kind in political and business leadership nowadays.

All this hubbub about the Brexit vote and the false flag … I mean horrific murder of Jo Cox by an evil xenophobic Breexit terrorist could have been avoided if Britain just had America’s Diebold Voting Machines, which can produce whatever electoral result that you desire regardless of the actual votes cast!

Seriously though, it’s curious that the Cox murder happened around the same time that the Orlando shooting did in America–and both events are being manipulated to push certain political agendas in the USA and UK.

Purely coincidental of course.

And the great irony about the “European” Union is that it wasn’t even created by the Europeans but by the Americans, who designed this monstrosity as a way to keep their Euro-vassals on a tight leash.

This is perhaps why Barack Obama has been so insistent that Britain stay in the EU–and why the USA would have the motivation to stage a false flag murder of Cox to “steer” the Breexit vote.

Swedish Anna Lindh was killed shortly before the referendum of the euro. It may have had an impact, but it did not change the outcome. The Swedish people massively said no to the euro.

Jo Cox was a coming woman in British politics like what foreign minister Anna Lindh was in Sweden. At the time she was murdered, British papers wrote that she may have been the daughter of Olof Palme (a son of kings). This possibility was never mentioned in Swedish papers.

British media also reported better when Olof Palme was murdered. I think he was killed because he was disobedient, didn´t like the EU and wanted to preserve Swedish neutrality ands save central Europe from nuclear war together with Bruno Kreisky and Willy Brandt (Palme was fluent in German and French and the other two spoke Scandinavian languages, a powerful mix). British media pointed out he was a womanizer and may have had a mistress in London. Somebody may have been jealous. Perhaps, but I stand by my assessment. I met this man trice. I never talked with him, but my french girlfriend did and also my grandparents. He was a great man, one of the last statesmen in Europe. I honoured him the day after his death in February 1986. My son and I saw the blood and the flowers.

Jo Cox. “Gud hjalpe Aand hennes”, God help her spirit, as the Vikings said.in old Norse.

GBPUSD just air-pocketed 100 pips – shortly after a very boring 2Y Treasury auction. The plunge from 1.47 to 1.4575 was extremely sharp and as of now it appears from desk chatter to be pre-emptive for the next polls – from ORB and YouGov – which are due at 10pm local time, or 5pm ET.http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-20/cable-just-snapped

Forgive me that I fell into ZH’s traop: They were describing the “And this fellow Americans, is how the American Revolution began, April 20, *1775*.”, but as hungry for clicks as they (as a commercial biz) are confused [Headline] with [last sentence of the article]

“British support for remaining in the European Union has weakened in the wake of the murder of the pro-EU politician Jo Cox, according to an online research company Friday.”

“The same thing happened in Norway, where the popularity of the anti-immigration parties was strengthened, not weakened, after Anders Breivik’s attacks on the junior members of the pro-immigration party.”

Even John Oliver on his HBO show, Last Week Tonight, sided with the remain side with the confusing statements that voting to leave the EU would essentially not change anything and that Brits would be insane to leave the EU.

Spot-on take [I just quickly brushed through the article, but what I read, I liked] on what just happened in the UK in a span of just a few short days. Oh, and is still happening… because this woman, and only this woman apparently, deserves endless ‘memorial’ ceremonies, one after another. As many as you can cram together from here till the voting day.

Also on this subject, I just saw the EU in/out Q&A session with Corbyn… (oh dear dog! And I thought porkophile Scameron Q&A session was bad enough last Saturday. Well! I was wrong. Dead wrong! If I have the stomach, I’ll post my reactions to Corbyn’s “performance” to it later…)

But there’s this: (*sigh* the voice of reason for a change…) .

Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange Backs Brexit

“He said the UK government “launders things to the EU and then claims that it can’t do anything about it.” Adding:

“The UK is bad for the EU, but also the EU is bad for the UK because it permits a lack of democratic accountability in this country by permitting successive governments in this country to simply say ‘oh, we are forced into doing things because of EU legislation’ when it is precisely these governments that have been behind the EU legislation in the first place [..]”

^ And there you go, another guy who knows [besides the OP] what he’s talking about. The point he’s making there is the fundamental point a lot of Brexiters are also making about “democracy” and ruling “your own country,” only perhaps not as articulately. In the end, it doesn’t matter if who ever has been voted-in turns out to be a fraud, at least people have the consolation prize of voting them out at the next election. No such thing going-on with the unelected EU Commission, which in turn, plays conveniently in the hands of elected main-stream parties, riddled with wide-spread globalist corruption all across the EU: they looooove to blame Brussels for all the things they’re “supposedly” not allowed to do, because of EU “directives,” “red-tape” or whatever they cite.

Step one: remove the excuse [clear the room]. Step two: expose them for what they are; unashamed, sociopathic liars. Step three; get rid of them at the first opportunity you get.

Not really Rocket Science, is it?

-TL2Q

PS: When all the above fails, go for ‘Uncle B’s’ option [posted earlier] – me personally: I’m even more old-school than he is… I’m all pitchforks and torches ;-) (It’s a darn shame them iPhones don’t explode on command – they just fail and set themselves on fire randomly) :/

Long with no real explanation to anyone who hasn’t actually lived in UK through the 70’s and knows British politics by heart for the past 40 years, and it’s a whine to extra time to register the voters although that would give both sides extra votes, and pretty much else “remain” campaign does, did or will ever do. As if the other side couldn’t print more leaflets, get more ads and all the rest?

Besides, everyone knows that this thing will be disregarded if “leave” wins, and hailed and milked for years if it decides to stay in EU.

Her “death” may be another hoax. People have noticed the strange behavior of her family members and that none of them seem genuinely sad. There are even smiles/smirks. She is probably still alive and will live under another name.

Watched the video of the family and sister’s speech. Although there is on the surface too much cheeriness for the situation, I don’t think it supports any conspiracy about a faked death. The sister said they’d always bee grown up (presumably by the mother, smiling next to her) to see the glass half full and be positive in everything. I’d see this as reaction formation defences, British stiff upper lip, keep calm and carry on, anxious smiling in public glare etc. Bizarre to some other cultures and classes yes. But not dissimilar to some East Asian cultures who smile and nervously laugh in dreadful situations.

Whether she was set up by the Deep State is another matter. The Remain campaign milked the situation. The timing is suspicious. But a hoax… No. Seriously doubt that.

“In 1998 Griffin was convicted of distributing material likely to incite racial hatred, for which he received a suspended prison sentence. In 2006 he was acquitted of separate charges of inciting racial hatred. Griffin has been criticised for many of his comments on political, social, ethical and religious matters, but after becoming leader of the BNP he sought to distance himself from some of his previously held positions, which include Holocaust denial. In recent years, events where Griffin has been invited to participate in public debates or political discussions have proven controversial and often resulted in protests and cancellations.”

“He helped set up the White Noise Music Club in 1979, and several years later worked with white power skinhead band, Skrewdriver.”

I am not necessarily disagreeing about the posting of the article, or the contents of the article (that convinces me that it is the ex leader of the BNP), it is just that I think you are seriously falling down here without a discription of who the author is (given the name).

You raised a good point although I don’t see any reason why the article shouldn’t be aired here. The EU is part or vassal of the UZion empire and it’s disintegration is a godsend for Russia, the very reason for our blog.

I don’t think the Saker attempted to deceive as to the identity of the author = he could very easily use any nom-de-plume he fancied and you would be none the wiser. I think it is very honest that he put his name upfront.

Thank you for raising that Andrew, yes, I am indeed THAT Nick Griffin – which I think speaks volumes for the courage and broad-minded commitment to free speech of your Editor, who has been ‘accused’ of being “pro-Muslim” – something which has rarely been said of me!

A couple of points in response: First, for the sake of non-Brit readers, I’d like to point out that, in the UK law under which I was prosecuted, “the truth is no defence”. The judge in my first trial, summing up before sentencing me after I’d been convicted by a jury in one of the most ‘liberal’ parts of London, acknowledged that everything I had written was true and said I had “crossed the line inadvertently” – which is why he suspended the sentence.

Second, in 2006 I was ACQUITTED by two juries in Yorkshire who objected to the British state’s attempt to use the same rotten laws to try to punish me for trying to draw public attention to the then-hidden scandal of the mass sexual grooming and drug rape of English and Sikh girls by gangs of young Muslim men from the Wahhabi-radicalised (self-created) ghettos of England.

Third, is there really something wrong with trying to involve alienated youngsters in the democratic process, and using music to do so?

Fourth, one thing Wiki won’t report (they won’t even let me edit out the many mistakes in their entry on me!) is that I went to Damascus as the war criminal Cameron was preparing to attack Syria in 2013 and wrote the letter that the Speaker of the Syrian People’s Assembly sent to all British MPs and which helped to sway the vote to a tiny majority against war and the disaster it would have created.

I assume that, as a Saker follower, you’re pro-Assad and against the schemes of Cameron, Nato, et al. So hopefully you’ll concede that I’m not all bad!

Thank you Nick for this article and your courage in highlighting the scheming (to put it mildly) going on in the UK right now. Just the other day when reading Saker’s blog I was wondering why there is no mention or analysis of UK referendum but I now see it’s been addressed quite well.

I have been trying to explain to some of my Remain and pro-EU friends that various British and European patriotic parties are usually against the interventionism (amongst other things) and that their influence on Western foreign policy can reasonably be expected to be an improvement to what we have now. It is hard however to drive this point home amongst all the noise and name calling.

So late Jo Cox has been made into some hero but how many remember that she was one of several MPs who in October last year publicly called for yet another ‘humanitarian intervention’ this time in Syria, (after Russia had already started their involvement). Is this something we’re supposed to celebrate and what does an average British person gain from such policies?

Nick, thank you for responding. My only point is that I thought there should have been an introduction about you. In the past there have been introductions to guest writers and I think it is important that we know who the author is. To be clear, it was never my intention to suggest that your article be removed. I concede that you defend yourself very well.

Yes! The postal votes (anyone can get one in the UK simply on request, there are millions of them and people with them are much more likely to vote) are especially vulnerable to fraud. They come in over several weeks to local town halls and are opened each day by a couple of bureaucrats, all of whom are members of the pro-Labour, pro-Remain trade union UNISON.

There is no oversight at this stage and each day the ballots are stored in totally insecure cardboard boxes. So either the clique who the local (Labour) council appoint to open the ballots, or any other town hall worker who has a go at the boxes later, can take a pencil and enter second crosses on as many ‘Leave’ ballot papers as they want, thereby spoiling them.

The British electoral system disgraces your average banana republic. I’ve monitored elections in Russia, Ukraine and Azerbijan, and nowhere have I seen a system have as bad as Britain’s.

Yes, look into the background and results of 2nd round of Austrian Presidential Elections. An appeal has been submitted to their Constitutional Court few weeks ago. In summary:

– Some postal votes were counted without observers – Overall postal votes showed a much higher swing to pro-EU and globalist option than the opinion polls and votes at polling station did – A number of towns or regions showed a higher than registered number of votes – A much higher percentage of ‘invalid’ votes in the 2nd round compared to 1st round even though the ballot and the choice was much simpler (2 candidates only) – Official website on the evening of live vote counting showed a clear advantage for FPO even after adding postal votes (partly counted). Then the same page went down and on the following Monday a result was announced which “made the EU breathe the sigh of relief”

As a result Pro EU candidate won by only 30,000 votes. We’ll see what happens after review by Constitutional Court.

I suspect that the “Constitutional Court” is made up of the same pro-elite faction in power. To repeat the often misquoted saying said to be by Stalin, “it doesn’t matter who votes,but who counts the votes”. Regardless who said it,its totally true today just as it was yesterday.The key is to make sure that our side never must worry about that again.After liberation,a system needs to be established “guaranteeing” (without question) the neutrality of vote counting. How to do that ,I’m not sure. But it must be done.If we are to live in any kind of true “democratic” nation. If not,we should give up the idea of real democracy and just accept a dictated state organization. But one that functions for the good of the “people” not just for the elite. To me that choice is the most important for the “modern World”,present and future.And will determine mankind’s future for a very long time.

Jo Cox and Thomas Mair stand out as two sincere, yet irreconcilable, promoters of “European values”. The former a liberal imperialist spouting lies and imbecilities learned by rote about — most notably — Russia, Syria, and of course the horrible EU itself; the latter a violent slob yearning for imperialism without immigrants and refugees. Indeed, should his act of murder swing the outcome of the referendum, he’ll be richly ‘rewarded’ by the victorious EU fanatics in charge all right, poor sod. As for the liberal imperialists, one wonders if their arrogance and their raw contempt of all and sundry will allow their precious EU to survive for even two years before it finally comes crashing down.

I fully agree with you that Brexit will have not brought the primordial aim of smashing the existing corrupt political order. But don’t expect a cosmic event to do the job for us!

The Marxist revolution started as an international working class movement to topple the capitalist elites, perfectly aware that it was a class struggle, not a nationalist project. But some countries’ working classes were far ahead of others in their political development (e.g. Germany’s was the vanguard for decades in organization and discipline while the French more daring and spirited) and it was necessary to adjust the speed of the revolutionary process according to the local conditions. In the end Lenin took the bold move to leapfrog Germany but the Soviets soon learned that international solidarity, although very enthusiastic among the intelligentsia and progressive political circles, was lacking where it matters and they were left alone to fend for themselves, hence Stalin’s slogan “Communism in one Country”.

The lesson is, we can’t have simultaneous uprisings all over Europe, not even an isolate one because, in last resort, NATO’s Gladio is there and it is at work. Or do you think NATO is there to protect the US?

But a little exit here and another one there will eventually gather some momentum and bring the collapse of the parasitic Empire, including the Russian oligarchic branch.

@Kim: Even worse: Today we don’t have nations anymore. And especially: We don’t have a working class anymore, no-where.

What we do have is a merger of brainwashed MSM programmed zombies, fragmented and shattered into thousands of pieces. And Individualistic and the more so egocentric and egoistic ones. Geiz ist geil … To organize them into a class struggle is out of any question. And this didn’t even calculate in the illiterate migrant swarms.

I didn’t write about the Rothschilds and the fractional reserve banking system (which I have opposed all my political life and opposition to which I had inserted into the old BNP constitution) because the article was about Jo Cox and the EU referendum, and not about the banking swindle. I’ve written plenty of those elsewhere.

As was mentioned on Crosstalk (and also here). The most “probable” election/referendum fraud may be in the “postal ballots” of the almost 5 million British citizens aboard. That is around 8% of Britain’s population. If they vote “remain” (which is likely) that may be the deciding factor. I don’t believe unless you live in a country.You should be able to vote in local elections. Your life isn’t affected by these votes (at least in most ways). Unlike the peoples lives that “actually” like in their countries.If you have “left” your country (unless its a temporary absence),why should your wishes be counted as opposed to those citizens living there.I see that as a “prime” way for the global elites to control nations from a distance. And I think they are very aware of that and use it.

Good point, but disenfranchising citizens would open a Pandora’s box although I don’t think it would make much difference to the final result: people end up electing politicians anyway, and that is the cause of all ills.

The elites use the electoral system to: 1. Legitimate the appropriation of power; 2. Manipulate it to serve their agenda and remain in power.

The clearest case of electoral manipulation (apart from outright fraud)was the Blair’s regime opening up the immigration floodgates to perpetuate New Labour’s hold on power. The great majority of immigrants tend to vote Labour and changing the demographics of the UK would ensure a virtual dictatorship.

Blair’s megalomania though took over his scheming plans when he joined Bush to bring mayhem to the Middle East. He became toxic and Labour is in the wilderness. Just deserves for such evil man – actually he deserves the bullet that was fired the other day; that would be justice.

Myself and my wife voted by post. Granted we currently live in canada, but we are moving back to the UK in September and thus feel our vote counts. Whether that vote will actually end up being counted, we have the right to do so.

They are much more sophisticated and deadly than just whispering bad thoughts. Mind control is quite an ageing science now and has a huge box of tools and tricks of trade to influence and command behaviour. Also a long tradition in political motivated killings especially in the US.

There is a common thread in most recent “terrorist” shootings: almost invariably, the shooters are mentally unbalanced individuals with connections to the spy/secret services agencies. And that tells a tale.

Whether the British choose to leave or remain in the EU during this referendum is almost immaterial. The European Union is a non-functional organisation and is doomed to collapse under its own hubris in a short time. The growing unpopularity of policies originating in the USA and imposed – via Brussels – on the European peoples will lead to their downfall.

Just like the collapse of the Soviet Empire, this one will happen in a very brief period of time. Later, all the fake analysts will pretend that they saw it coming all along – just like with the USSR collapse.

Sorry to sound a discordant note, but I don’t see the remotest analogy between the collapse of the USSR and the economic abyss facing the EU, not to mention the wide chasm between the people and their rulers.

The collapse of the Soviet Union was a top-down affair where the elites plotted to plunder the state’s assets through privatization schemes in cohorts with US/EU/Jewish banksters and Harvard economists. That’s why there so many Russian billionaires relatively to the countries GDP and population. It was plain highway robbery of people’s share of the national wealth.

Capitalism will reach a dead end regardless because it is inherent to the system that relies on perpetual consumption beyond human needs and exhaustion of resources for continuing growth. Competition will lead inexorably to monopoly where scant resources will be ultimately controlled by fewer corporations, a process already evident by the accumulation of wealth by the 1/% and their control of the political process. Concomitant with that is the increasing inequality and impoverishment of the masses.

In the past there were escape mechanisms to control social/political tensions, be it migrations, wars, plagues, revolutions or economic advancements, but in the modern urbanized societies people are trapped in a straight-jacket of laws imposed by a state that has the monopoly over weapons and violence and the only outlet left to resolve the contradictions of the capitalist economic model is war for the control of ever diminishing resources.

Unless the people resist being part of it by acts of civil disobedience and opting out of the economic rat-race, we are condemned to the horrors of a war to end all wars and humanity.

This ‘referendum’ was stolen long before this attack. Basic rule: European plutocracies will not let a referendum take place unless they are sure of the outcome. How can they be sure? They’re rigged of course.

MI5 has this one. Chances are, the final percentage was decided upon months ago. They may even be able to manipulate the outcome down to a tenth of a percentage. My bet is the usual ‘close call’ hoax, with remain/exit looking something like 53/47.

‘Cause you know, you have to make the plebs think they’re in control and that everything in a flourishing democracy comes down to the wire.

The strangest, and most suspicious thing about the murder of Jo Cox, is the speed with which the murderer, Thomas Mair was linked to far right groups in the USA via an alleged ‘invoice’ for right wing books and weapons manuals, dated to the 1990s. These documents were ‘discovered’ by the Southern Poverty and Law Centre – buried among the paper records, which they hold in their archives, of a defunct neonate group from a time before emails or electronic invoicing. These documents appeared in the British press within 12 hours of Mair’s arrest.

How is that possible?

There was no mention of an ‘American link’ in any evidence from the British police on the day it happened. All of Mair’s neighbours gave evidence that he had “never expressed any political views of any kind in 20 years”. they also said he was the most mild-mannered person in the community and had “never been known to even swear in the last 20 years, even when the local kids were tormenting him”.

Why did an obscure Southern American Law Centre suddenly decide, on hearing of the murder of a British MP by a mentally ill loner, 3,000 miles away – why did they decide to go searching into a TWENTY YEAR OLD paper invoice archive – and how were they possibly able to find a single invoice from Thomas Mair within half a day? What motivated them to even try to do that?

If you asked any large organisation in the UK to go back 20 years in its paper archives, from the time before emails, databases and Google – and pull out a single invoice for a magazine, from someone who lives the other side of the Atlantic – how could they possibly do that?

I’m not suggesting that the invoice was necessarily ‘fake’ – but it does suggest that an Intelligence Agency ‘planted’ that information to achieve maximum affect in the UK within hours.

The scenario that you describe about Mair’s invoice is actually quite plausible and is not suspicious in the least–just like the absolutely plausible idea that Mohammed Atta’s paper passport would be conveniently found in the World Trade Center rubble, surviving both an airplane catastrophically slamming into the WTC towers and the collapse of these towers involving fires with temperatures hot enough (allegedy) to melt steel girders.

I think you’ll find that Mr. Farage would be rightly indignant if you said he is “like” the author of this article. It may be that you are unfamiliar with who’s who and what’s what in British politics. One thing I should clarify: I am talking about ultra-nationalist ideology and racism.

Haha, some “ultra-nationalists”, those highly adorable Ukros! Seem to be very happy inviting criminal foreigners to rule over their Banderite fiefdom. Victoria Nuland proved Marie Antoinette right: Offer the slobs some cookies and they’ll eat shit out of sheer gratitude. Clearly, that’s not nationalism; it’s total worthlessness and vileness.

But as ioan said and as I said for years: This entire 50%:50% ratio *again*, like with Austria and Schottland before, same with the 2008 Obama election and the 2000 Bush election: That often in a row it simply cannot happen.

Those “poll” results can only have been made up in some lonely dark room, like the mentioned “referenda” or “elections”.

I simply don’t buy that and never did. It is not a probable outcome, yet they “reach” such “tight” results each time. Makes me produce a dry laugh with echo: HXA HXA HXA