Friday, July 10, 2009

Firefox and Maxthon is just a Browser engine rather than using for browsing, but definetley Maxthon is much better than Firefox.

Maxthon start more quickly: I did not mean that it is faster, because the IMO in the preparation of the page as fast as they are. But Firefox is killing me when I click its icon to start it. It takes too long to start. Maxthon is a very fast on this. Actually this is not the fault of Firefox, because Microsoft's IE engine is loaded into memory in the Windows start-up and travel from the use of the engine, and its start-up time is incredibly fast. However, Firefox has to load all. DLL's and libraries so the memory from the ground to spend a lot of time to start. Even if it is not Firefox's fault, I am an experienced user such as a delay, so I have my rights, do not like it anyway! I suggest Firefox development of discrete event systems to restart Firefox will cache the relevant library and DLL in the Windows startup. Prior to this, Firefox was a major negative for me.
The use of the two browsers are very carefully designed pluggins, in order to strengthen its capacity. I think more than Firefox Maxthon pluggins the pluggins and they are good in writing. However, Firefox's pluggins IMO more interference, not so fast on the performance. I do not like the Firefox update check every time you start (which is slow enough!) And I found less pluggins Maxthon interfering and faster.

As for configuration, Maxthon is the future direction. This is the incredible variety of ways of custom, you can imagine and in fact this is why I like it. Firefox is also very good, but not as good as in custom travel. Just select your browser's option in two pages, you will be very surprised at the number of configuration options to provide travel.