You are forgotten that the refuges are no only living in camps but they will never assimilate their systems of believe to those of the countries they
are running into, firs it takes years to brake the language barriers, second they have to accommodate them within the population that most resemble
from where they come from, you forget also that this refugees bring their tribal connections and they may be from the middle east but they also belong
to different sects and tribes.

All that will cause chaos within the societies they are trying to get into, first.

How this middle eastern migration has done in the EK? so far? is a lot of societal tensions between them and the rest of the population and most are
still living in poverty even after years later.

Actually I know how it all works, as I was involved in something similar.

Let's use Germany as example - they are not expecting refugees to assimilate, but some will, mostly those who were educated and disagreed with non
secular organization in country/state. Each state in Germany had different approach (just like here in USA we see the same), but most allowed refugees
to integrate and work. At some point, they will get off refugee program and start to pay for rent/food themselves.

I've seen this happening before, and language is not a problem. Just check what has happened with Turks in Germany. They are biggest minority in
Germany today...

Yes, you are right some will assimilate and even leave their system of believes are they were not working for them back in their countries of origins
and can do that without repercussions of it, but is others also that will never assimilate but rather expect the countries that they have migrated to
bend down to their system of believes, this create tensions as usual, that is when you know who is actually behind agendas from those who are not.

I see what you are saying and I do understand your fear of unknown, but you forgot one major factor - reason people leaving their homes/homeland -
they are running away from those that are actually trying to do exactly what you are accusing them they will do...

They are running away from those who are trying to oppress them and do actually what you think they will do?!

Sure, there will be some who would not adopt well, but majority will... and that is what counts.

No is not about fears of the unknown, as is already data available of what migration does to countries where they are to receive the majority of them
in modern times, no in ancient times, but modern times.

Is does that assimilate and is does that will cause trouble because that is not the agenda they came as refuges to do.

Our children will be the first generation since WW1 told to expect less. Something wrong there in whats supposed to be a first world nation.

One has to wonder if we were not allowing all these refugees access to our nation and benefits system. And we stopped sending 100s of millions of
pounds overseas to help third world nations by way of foreign aid, which never actually reaches the people in need, would we still be in the same
mess?

The US send billions of dollars to other countries in aid, the problem is that the money never gets to the hands of those that need it, it ends in the
hands of the totalitarian and dictatorial leaders so they keep oppressing their citizens.

a reply to: andy06shake
The thing is in countries like China and India and the countries of Africa the poor have gained much more wealth in the recent past which makes a
huge difference to the overall figures millions are being bought out of poverty. We only hear bad news in the west. Rarely do we get to hear about the
success stories in the developing world. I know a mobile phone is hardly a mark of wealth, but Africans in mud huts now have mobile phones and many
material things we have in the west.

See i would imagine housing, clean water and ample food supply are far more relevant than a mobile phone any day of the week. And if indeed these
nations are being bought out of poverty by way of our foreign aid contributions then why are there 100,000s of refugees being dumped on our respective
door steps as the days go by?

BEIJING — China is pushing ahead with a sweeping plan to move 250 million rural residents into newly constructed towns and cities over the next
dozen years — a transformative event that could set off a new wave of growth or saddle the country with problems for generations to come.

That is fascism when it is done by force.

But, when there are profits to be made, whats the big deal with supporting human and environmental abuses

Considering that China is the primary source for the decrease in poverty I'd say that yes they did account for China. It even says in the article that
the majority of the decrease comes from Southeast Asia.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.