Deep Capture Files Major Lawsuit Against the SEC

June 10, 2014 67 min read

I have filed a lawsuit against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which previously failed to respond adequately to my Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking SEC documents related to the SEC’s various investigations (and failure to perform adequate investigations) of naked short selling crimes that undermined the stability of the American financial system.

This is the first lawsuit against the SEC ever filed by a journalist seeking information about the SEC’s failure to regulate naked short selling, one of the most serious crimes affecting the American markets. I have filed the lawsuit with help from Gary Aguirre, a former senior enforcement official with the SEC, famous for having blown the whistle on the protection that top SEC officials were providing to hedge fund Pequot Capital and Morgan Stanley CEO John Mack.

Aguirre made headlines in 2006 by reporting in Congressional testimony that he had been improperly fired by the SEC after complaining that top SEC officials had derailed an investigation into an insider trading scheme perpetrated by Pequot Capital, and that the investigation had likely been derailed because the Aguirre had also been investigating Mack in connection with the insider trading, while Aguirre’s supervisor at the SEC was preparing to take a job with Mack’s law firm.

What did not make the headlines was the fact that Aguirre reported in that same Congressional testimony that when he was improperly fired, he had been investigating not only insider trading, but also naked short selling. “The investigation was two-pronged,” Aguirre reported to Congress. One prong concerned “insider trading.” However, the second, and far more important prong, concerned “market manipulation” and, more specifically, “two suspected violations: wash sales and naked shorts.”

“My colleagues,” Aguirre reported to Congress, “believed [the naked short selling] held a greater potential to severely injure the financial markets.” Indeed, Aguirre reported to Congress that naked short selling had the potential to deliver a market crash similar to the crash of 1929, from which followed the Great Depression.

Two years later, in 2008, that prediction proved correct when naked short selling contributed to a meltdown just as severe as the great crash of 1929. At that time in 2008, the CEOs of multiple Wall Street investment banks (long among the perpetrators of naked short selling) complained that naked short selling was contributing to the death spirals in their stock prices, and the SEC responded by issuing an unprecedented “Emergency Order” that temporarily banned all short selling of stock in more than 900 companies in the financial industry.

In that Emergency Order, the SEC effectively admitted that naked short sellers were contributing to the worse financial crisis since the Great Depression, and the SEC subsequently enacted new rules that supposedly made it more difficult for traders to engage in naked short selling, but those new rules were not sufficient, and to this day, the SEC has not sanctioned even one trader for perpetrating the naked short selling that (according to the SEC) contributed to the great meltdown of 2008, and nor has the SEC released any documents concerning its supposed investigation into that naked short selling—one of the great unsolved crimes of the century.

One purpose of my lawsuit is to force the SEC to hand over documents related to its investigation, or failure to investigate, the naked short selling that contributed to the great meltdown of 2008, but that is not all. There is massive amount of other information my lawsuit seeks to extract from the SEC, and I encourage you to read the lawsuit in its entirety because it is a gory chronicle indeed of the crimes that naked short sellers have perpetrated against the markets, and an even more shocking tale of how the SEC has failed to enforce the law while actually providing cover for the perpetrators of a crime that, at the present moment, is still undermining the stability of the global financial markets.

The lawsuit is posted in its entirety below:

United States District Court

FOR THE NORTHERN District of ILLINOIS

Eastern division

MARK MITCHELL

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Defendant.

Case No. ____________________

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

This is an action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, as amended, to compel Defendant United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to produce, provide access to, and make available certain records specified below that were requested by Plaintiff Mark Mitchell.

the opening of matters of inquiry (MUIs), the opening of investigations, and the filing of any enforcement proceedings by the SEC in relation to individuals or institutions who may have violated SEC Regulation SHO (“Reg SHO”) and/or engaged in the naked short selling of the stock of public companies, or

the opening of MUIs, opening of investigations, or the filing of any enforcement proceedings involving specific public companies whose stock was the subject of possible violations of Reg SHO and/or naked short selling.

JURISDICTION

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B).

PARTIES

Plaintiff is a citizen of the United States, a resident of Cook County, and a journalist.

Defendant is an agency of the United States Government and has possession and control of the records that are the subject of this action.

RELEASE OF THE RECORDS SOUGHT TO PLAINTIFF WOULD SERVE THE HIGHEST PUBLIC INTEREST

The release and disclosure of the information sought by Plaintiff’s FOIA requests as alleged in this complaint would serve the highest public interest because Plaintiff would utilize the released information to contribute significantly to the public’s understanding of the following:

the inherent flaws in regulations created by the SEC to stop naked short selling;

the lack of transparency in the regulatory system relating to the processing of short sale trades;

the SEC’s lax enforcement of the securities acts and related rules, including Reg SHO, against those who engage in naked short selling, and, most importantly;

how these factors combine to create a dangerously high and unacceptable level of risk to the integrity of the nation’s and the world’s capital markets.

The records should be furnished without any charge in that the information is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to the public understanding of the operations or activities of the SEC and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.

Federal regulations describe how the SEC has been entrusted with powers and duties of “great social and economic significance to the American people,” the prevention of abuses that would undermine the integrity of the nation’s economic institutions. Section 200.53 of Title 17 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations spells out that trust:

Members of the Securities and Exchange Commission are entrusted by various enactments of the Congress with powers and duties of great social and economic significance to the American people. It is their task to regulate varied aspects of the American economy, within the limits prescribed by Congress, to insure that our private enterprise system serves the welfare of all citizens. Their success in this endeavor is a bulwark against possible abuses and injustice which, if left unchecked, might jeopardize the strength of our economic institutions.

As more specifically alleged below, naked short selling by broker-dealers in their own accounts and on behalf of other market participants is exactly the type of abuse that could “jeopardize the strength of our economic institutions.” The SEC has not merely failed to stop this form of market abuse. It has created a regulatory system which conceals naked short selling, prevents the public (including investors and other victims of naked short selling) from investigating the naked short sales, rewards those who engage in it, and also rewards securities exchanges, which have a duty to enforce the law, for closing their eyes to the unlawful practices consummated through them.

As specifically alleged below, the SEC has sponsored, supervises, and presides over a regulatory system that has allowed and in fact encouraged broker-dealers and other market participants to create billions of shares of counterfeit stock in hundreds of millions of trades which collectively put the integrity of the capital markets at risk. The counterfeit stock has been and continues to be created through a practice commonly referred to as “naked short selling.” Naked short sales share no properties in common with lawful short sales, except both involve a purported sale of stock.

In a lawful short sale, the seller borrows the stock from a third party and makes real delivery of the borrowed stock to the buyer. In a naked short sale, the market participant neither owns nor has borrowed the stock, but nevertheless purports to sell genuine stock of the public company to the buyer. In substance, a market participant who engages in a naked short sale delivers counterfeit stock to the buyer.

Once the counterfeit stock is sold through a naked short sale, it continues in circulation in the securities markets much like counterfeit bank notes continue in circulation after they are introduced into the monetary system. It has the effect of increasing the supply of stock available on the market for sale, which generally has a depressing effect on the price of the genuine stock of the public company whose name the counterfeit stock bares. The naked short sales of counterfeit stock harm investors holding genuine stock, investors who receive the counterfeit stock, and the public company whose stock is diluted with counterfeit stock. The aggregate creation of counterfeit stock creates high and unacceptable risks to the integrity of the nation’s and the world’s capital markets.

Plaintiff is a reporter for DeepCapture.com, an online financial news service. He previously worked as editorial page writer for The Wall Street Journal in Europe, chief business correspondent for Time magazine’s Asia edition, and as assistant managing editor responsible for the Columbia Journalism Review’s online critique of business journalism. He holds an MBA from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.

Plaintiff gathers information from numerous sources often overlooked by the mainstream financial media, uses his editorial skills to turn this raw information into narratives regarding the financial industry, and regularly publishes that information on an internet website known as DeepCapture at no cost to the public.[1]

The website is called DeepCapture because it focuses on objectively presenting in-depth news coverage of events and actions that demonstrate that the independence of a federal agencies have been compromised by regulatory capture. Regulatory capture occurs when a regulatory agency, such as the SEC, which was created to act in the public interest, instead advances the commercial or special concerns of interest groups that dominate the industry or sector it is charged with regulating. These agencies are called “captured agencies.”

The DeepCapture website, for which Plaintiff writes, has received awards, such as Business Insider’s award for best investigative journalism and the Webby award for best business reporting. The DeepCapture website has also been discussed by mainstream news organizations, e.g., CNBC and Wired magazine.

Plaintiff has also written numerous articles on the DeepCapture website about how the SEC is not only a captured agency but is part of a larger group of institutions that have been captured by the financial industry in this country.

Plaintiff has published numerous articles on the DeepCapture website describing how financial institutions and individuals have engaged in naked short selling in the stock of public companies. These violations were rarely reported by the mainstream or financial media. To the extent that naked short selling was reported in the financial media, some mainstream news organizations, including Bloomberg News,[2] reported that naked short selling was a serious problem, but these reports were few in number, and other journalists often expressed skepticism that naked short selling was even occurring, thereby giving false comfort to the public regarding the risks naked short selling posed to the nation’s capital markets.

Plaintiff is one of the few journalists, perhaps the only one, who regularly writes about naked short selling. Plaintiff believes it is vitally important for the American public to be aware that the SEC is failing to contain market participants such as large investment banks, market-makers, and multibillion dollar hedge funds from engaging in naked short selling. It is as if the Department of the Treasury were aware of massive printing of US currency by counterfeiters and yet declined to take any action to stop them.

The following examples illustrate the depth and uniqueness of news stories published on the DeepCapture website relating to naked short selling:

In relation to the settlement between FINRA and UBS in October 2011, Plaintiff was one of two media sources that reported that FINRA had found and UBS had admitted committing “tens of millions” of violations of Reg SHO and that those violations put at risk the integrity of the capital markets.[3] In the light of FINRA’s finding and UBS’s admissions, the FINRA enforcement proceeding against UBS was unquestionably the single most significant regulatory case brought by the government or a Self-Regulating Organization (“SRO”) relating to naked short selling since Reg SHO became operative on January 1, 2004. In contrast, neither the financial nor the mainstream media reported that UBS had committed “tens of millions” of violations of Reg SHO and that the cumulative effect was to create a significant risk to the integrity of the capital markets.[4]

In a story written by another reporter, DeepCapture was one of two media sources that reported on the investigation conducted by the SEC’s Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) which resulted in a finding by the OIG in Case No. 512 (Unauthorized Disclosure of Non-Public Information) that two SEC attorneys had passed along nonpublic information through a corrupt FBI agent to a cabal engaged in naked short selling.[5] Through the reporter’s own exhaustive research and investigation, he identified the two SEC employees and published an article in DeepCapture, MoralHazard at the SEC, which described in detail how the two SEC investigators had communicated the nonpublic information through a corrupt FBI agent to the naked short selling cabal.[6] The financial and mainstream media did not cover the story.

As specifically alleged below, the magnitude and scope of naked short selling creates major risks to the stability of the nation’s capital markets. Equally disturbing, as alleged below, the SEC, a captured agency, is not protecting the nation’s investors or the capital markets from this form of market abuse.

Plaintiff seeks the records described in this complaint to use in articles he and other guest authors will write and publish on the DeepCapture website informing the public of the risks naked short selling poses to the integrity of the nation’s capital markets and the SEC’s complicity in creating a regulatory system that does not deter naked short selling. All of the information from the SEC is vitally needed because, as alleged below, the system created by the SEC relating to the short sale trades of public companies has little if any transparency. Plaintiff intends to make avaiable to the public all records obtained through this proceeding.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The regulatory history relevant to the current naked short selling of stock in public companies began in 1985 when the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”) commissioned Irving M. Pollack (“Pollack”)[7] to conduct a study of short selling (“Pollack study”). As stated in his report, Pollack concluded: “The fail-to-deliver / fail-to-receive problem has the potential for causing serious difficulties in a lengthy bear market.”[8] Naked short sales routinely result in failures to deliver and failures to receiveunless they are concealed by the broker-dealers who execute them. Pollack’s report also noted that there was no inherent mechanism to constrain the buildup of failures to deliver and warned of the consequences: “[T]he fact that there is no automatic mechanism preventing the substantial buildup of short positions at the clearing corporation and of fails to receive in the brokerage firms carries the potential for serious problems, particularly in the event of crisis market conditions.”[9] Pollack’s warning would prove prophetic two decades later in 2008, when giant investment banks began to collapse due in part to naked short selling.

Based on the conclusions in the Pollack Study, the NASD proposed an amendment to Section 59 of the NASD Uniform Practice Code which amendment was designed to curb naked short selling. In approving the amendment, SEC Exchange Release No. 26694, issued on April 4, 1989, the SEC concluded, “the NASD is taking a reasonable approach to deal with the problems that the Pollack study revealed. While fails-to-deliver resulting from short sales may be relatively infrequent, we cannot say that the proposed mandatory buy-in rule for public customers is an unwarranted restriction on short selling.”[10] The same SEC release also recognized: “naked short selling potentially can present substantial manipulative concerns. … The ability of naked short sellers to employ this leverage to effect ‘bear raids’ would appear to provide support for the NASD’s decision to impose additional discipline on naked short selling.” For the next 14 years, the SEC limited its role in relation to naked short selling to approving rules proposed by SROs relating to containing naked short selling. The constraints incorporated into the amendment to NASD Section 59 proved inadequate to stop or contain naked short selling.

On October 28, 2003, the SEC implemented its own rules to prohibit naked short selling when it issued Exchange Act Release No. 48709 (“Release 48709”) which included a preliminary version of Reg SHO.[11]

In Release 48709, the SEC explained the negative effects of naked short selling on the securities market:

Naked short selling can have a number of negative effects on the market, particularly when the fails to deliver persist for an extended period of time and result in a significantly large unfulfilled delivery obligation at the clearing agency where trades are settled. At times, the amount of fails to deliver may be greater than the total public float. In effect the naked short seller unilaterally converts a securities contract (which should settle in three days after the trade date) into an undated futures-type contract, which the buyer might not have agreed to or that would have been priced differently. The seller’s failure to deliver securities may also adversely affect certain rights of the buyer, such as the right to vote. More significantly, naked short sellers enjoy greater leverage than if they were required to borrow securities and deliver within a reasonable time period, and they may use this additional leverage to engage in trading activities that deliberately depress the price of a security.

In Release No. 48709, the SEC also explained how the SEC believed Reg SHO “would address the problem of ‘naked’ short selling.” The SEC pointed to two principal mechanisms that were expected to contain naked short selling:

[1] Proposed Regulation SHO would, among other things, require short sellers in all equity securities to locate securities to borrow before selling, and [2] would also impose strict delivery requirements on securities where many sellers have failed to deliver the securities. In part, this action is designed to address the problem of “naked” short selling.[12]

As more particularly alleged below, the financial crisis demonstrated that neither mechanism curbed naked short selling

Reg SHO became operative on January 1, 2005. In the commentary accompanying the final rule, the SEC expressed its optimism that Reg SHO and, in particular, Rule 203 would contain naked short selling:

As adopted, Rule 203 creates a uniform Commission rule requiring broker-dealers, prior to effecting short sales in all equity securities, to “locate” securities available for borrowing, and imposes additional delivery requirements on broker-dealers for securities in which a substantial amount of failures to deliver have occurred (“threshold securities”). We believe that strong and uniform requirements in this area will reduce short selling abuses. The locate and delivery requirements will act as a restriction on so-called “naked” short selling.[13]

From the date Reg SHO became operative, January 1, 2005, until the financial crisis struck in September 2008, the SEC’s enforcement of Reg SHO was almost nonexistent. Two SEC administrative decisions made passing reference to naked short selling and Reg SHO in 2006. In both cases, SEC administrative judges were dismissive of contentions that public companies were being ravaged by naked short selling.[14]

The SEC brought two administrative decisions to enforce Reg SHO in 2007.[15] In both cases, the alleged Reg SHO violations were limited to allegations that the respondents had falsely characterized short sales as long sales. The SEC’s minimal enforcement of Reg SHO from 2005 through 2008 implies its belief that the mere issuance of Reg SHO had convinced broker-dealers, traders, and other market participants to suspend their practice of naked short selling. Those engaged in naked short selling were unimpressed by a new regulation which the SEC chose not to enforce. The SEC’s tough talk in Reg SHO, absent its enforcement, did not deter or frighten them.

The SEC’s tepid enforcement of Reg SHO from its operative date, January 1, 2005, until the financial crisis struck in 2008 gave no clue that naked short selling was festering in the shadows, invisible to public companies afflicted by it. Few saw naked short selling as a serious risk to public companies, and virtually none saw it as a systemic risk that could threaten the capital markets. Until the 2008 financial crisis, the common perception was that naked short selling, if it existed, afflicted only a few, relatively small public companies.

One industry group, the broker-dealers, knew before the 2008 financial crisis that naked short selling was rampant and also knew the supposed constraints of Reg SHO were easily circumvented.

The Securities Industry Group (“SIA”), which represents more than 600 broker-dealers, has been particularly effective in blocking legislative and rule-making efforts to contain naked short selling. The SIA and its members successfully lobbied the SEC to draft the language in Reg SHO and other rules so that broker-dealers could conceal their lucrative naked short selling practices within loopholes the SEC incorporated into Reg SHO.

The SEC dubbed one of the loopholes the “Madoff exemption,” since it was the brainchild of Bernard Madoff (“Madoff”). Madoff was held in high esteem by the SEC in July 2004 when it issued the release accompanying the final version of Reg SHO. The “Madoff exemption” effectively allows a “bona fide” market-maker to engage in naked short selling briefly, supposedly as part of its role as a true market-maker. The limitation (bona fide) generally requires the market participant to simultaneously place a buy order at or near the best bid and a sell order at or near the best ask. As a practical matter, it is difficult if not impossible for public companies and market participants, with exception of the broker-dealers, to determine whether a specific short sale is a naked short sale or a trade by a “bona fide market-maker,” because the data necessary to make the determination is generally unavailable.

As a consequence of the Madoff exemption, more accurately described as the Madoff loophole, and SEC’s inability to track compliance with Reg SHO as alleged herein, the SEC has brought only one proceeding for abusing the bona fide market maker exemption, a case against an individual who was an insignificant market participant.[16] The SEC has never brought a case against a broker-dealer for abusing the bona fide market-maker exception.

The “Madoff exemption” was not the only loophole the SEC incorporated into Reg SHO at the behest of the SIA and its members. Market participants can also engage in short term naked short sales if they have “reasonable grounds to believe” they can borrow the stock before they have to deliver it to the buyer.[17] This creates an even bigger loophole in Reg SHO.

The SEC has been and continues to be incapable of determining whether short sale trades by broker-dealers and other market participants are in compliance with Reg SHO, because it has lacked the market surveillance expertise and equipment to track the volume and speed of the securities trading since Reg SHO became operational in January 1, 2005. The discrepancy between trading activity, now at approximately 5 million messages per second, and the SEC’s capacity to track that trading activity has progressively widened since Reg SHO became operative. The decision by the SEC to create Reg SHO, which purports to contain naked short selling, when the SEC knew it lacked the capacity to monitor the securities markets for violations of Reg SHO leads to the inescapable conclusion that Reg SHO was a sham to appease the public companies, investors and traders who had been harmed by naked short selling, while not offending the broker-dealers, especially the mega broker-dealers owned by Wall Street investment banks, who engaged in naked short selling since Reg SHO was in fact unenforceable.

The SIA has also vigilantly monitored the state legislatures for possible legislation which could fill the glaring gaps in Reg SHO and thereby threaten the broker-dealers’ lucrative naked short selling practice. In July 2006, the SIA learned that Utah had enacted a statute designed to stop naked short selling. The SIA immediately filed a civil action for injunctive relief to stay the enforcement of the statute. Later, the SIA led the successful charge to repeal the statute. The SIA’s actions to block the enforcement and then repeal the Utah statute is exactly the type of “protection” the SIA promises its broker-dealer members on its website with this words: “The Security Industry Association (SIA) protects and advances our members’ interests by: advocating pro-industry policies and legislation on Capitol Hill and throughout the 50 states…”[18]

Despite the lax enforcement of Reg SHO, the tone of the SEC’s releases relating to Reg SHO began to change in August 2007 to reflect the growing and legitimate concern by public companies and their investors about the harmful effects of naked short selling. For the first time, the SEC releases relating to Reg SHO contained this language:

[M]any issuers and investors continue to express concerns about extended fails to deliver in connection with “naked” short selling. To the extent that large and persistent fails to deliver might be indicative of manipulative “naked” short selling, which could be used as a tool to drive down a company’s stock price, fails to deliver may undermine the confidence of investors. These investors, in turn, may be reluctant to commit capital to an issuer they believe to be subject to such manipulative conduct. In addition, issuers may believe that they have suffered unwarranted reputational damage due to investors’ negative perceptionsregarding large and persistent fails to deliver. Any unwarranted reputational damage caused by large and persistent fails to deliver might have an adverse impact on the security’s price.[19]

Though the SEC had begun to hear public companies and their investors complain about naked short selling and sharpened its own rhetoric about naked short selling to appease the institutions and individuals harmed by naked short selling, it still took no meaningful action to enforce Reg SHO or the antifraud provisions of the securities acts against those who were engaged in the unlawful practice.

The SEC sharply escalated its verbal war against naked short selling in July 2008 when the chief executive officers of some of the world’s largest investment banks frantically sought protection from Congress and the SEC in relation to the naked short selling which was contributing to the collapsing prices of the stock of those banks. For the first time, it was not merely stock of smaller public companies which was being ravaged by naked short selling. Instead, naked short selling was perceived as a contributing cause of the failures of the nation’s oldest and biggest investment banks: Bear Stearns,[20] Merrill Lynch,[21] and Lehman Brothers.[22] The warning by the Pollack Study two decades earlier that naked short selling “carries the potential for serious problems, particularly in the event of crisis market conditions” seemed to be coming true.[23]

The voices of the CEOs reached a crescendo in September 2008 after three international and venerable U.S. investment banks (Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, and Lehman Brothers) had failed, leaving Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs teetering on the edge of the abyss. Time magazine quoted from a memo that John Mack, Morgan Stanley’s Chief Executive Officer, had sent to employees: ‘“What’s happening out there? It’s very clear to me — we’re in the midst of a market controlled by fear and rumors, and short sellers are driving our stock down,’ fumed John Mack.”[24] On September 17, 2008, Barron’s reported: “[T]he Securities & Exchange Commission’s head Christopher Cox is investigating naked short selling of shares of Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs after receiving calls from Morgan Stanley CEO John Mac [sic] about improper short-selling that was responsible for the stock’s nearly 30% decline today.”[25]

The pleas of the banks’ CEOs brought instant credibility to the notion that naked short selling could destroy public companies, even huge ones if the time was ripe. But the failing banks had special credibility. Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch all had their own proprietary desks manned by astute traders who had the skill and technology to recognize naked short selling. Each bank also had affiliated broker-dealers whose traders made markets in thousands of public companies. No one was better equipped than the traders in the banks’ brokerage firms to recognize that the banks’ stocks were in the crosshairs of traders who were pulling the trigger on naked short sales. More than likely, these banks through their proprietary desks and affiliated brokerage firms had pulled the trigger on naked short selling aimed at other public companies in the past.

The SEC quickly recognized the credibility and urgency of Morgan Stanley’s and Goldman Sachs’s pleas for help, particularly in view of the fact that three other banks had so quickly failed. Not surprisingly, Rule 203 had failed to deter naked short selling when that deterrence was most needed, during a financial crisis, just as the Pollack Study had predicted. The SEC responded with a series of emergency regulations and amendments to Reg SHO from July 2008 through July 2009 to stop or at least contain naked short selling.

On July 15, 2008, the SEC issued an emergency order prohibiting any short sales in the stock of 19 financial institutions, including Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs). In the release accompanying this emergency order, the SEC directly linked the order to the naked short sales of Bear Stearns stock. The release begins with the following explanation for the halting of naked short sales:

False rumors can lead to a loss of confidence in our markets. Such loss of confidence can lead to panic selling, which may be further exacerbated by “naked” short selling. As a result, the prices of securities may artificially and unnecessarily decline well below the price level that would have resulted from the normal price discovery process. If significant financial institutions are involved, this chain of events can threaten disruption of our markets.

The events preceding the sale of The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. are illustrative of the market impact of rumors. During the week of March 10, 2008, rumors spread about liquidity problems at Bear Stearns, which eroded investor confidence in the firm. As Bear Stearns’ stock price fell, its counterparties became concerned, and a crisis of confidence occurred late in the week. In particular, counterparties to Bear Stearns were unwilling to make secured funding available to Bear Stearns on customary terms. In light of the potentially systemic consequences of a failure of Bear Stearns, the Federal Reserve took emergency action.[26]

In issuing another emergency order in September 17, 2008, the SEC expressed even greater alarm how naked short selling had “exacerbated” other factors in causing the widening collapse of the securities markets. The SEC issued a protective stay on short sales trades in the stock of more than 900 banks, insurance companies, and securities firms. The SEC explained the rationale for the broadened stay with these words:

The Commission continues to be concerned that there is a substantial threat of sudden and excessive fluctuations of securities prices and disruption in the functioning of the securities markets that could threaten fair and orderly markets. As evidenced by our recent publication of an emergency order under Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “July Emergency Order”), we are concerned about the possible unnecessary or artificial price movements based on unfounded rumors regarding the stability of financial institutions and other issuers exacerbated by “naked” short selling. Our concerns, however, are no longer limited to just the financial institutions that were the subject of the July Emergency Order. In addition, we have become concerned that some persons may take advantage of issuers that have become temporarily weakened by current market conditions to engage in inappropriate short selling in the securities of such issuers.[27]

On October 14, 2008, as the financial crisis deepened, the SEC released an interim amended version of Reg SHO to stop naked short selling (Exchange Act Release No. 58773). The summary to the release announcing the interim rule explained its purpose as follows:

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is adopting an interim final temporary rule … to address abusive “naked” short selling in all equity securities by requiring that participants of a clearing agency registered with the Commission deliver securities by settlement date, or if the participants have not delivered shares by settlement date, immediately purchase or borrow securities to close out the fail to deliver position by no later than the beginning of regular trading hours on the settlement day following the day the participant incurred the fail to deliver position.[28]

In the same release (Exchange Act Release No. 58773), the SEC revised its description of how naked short selling could harm public companies. The SEC no longer described the harm caused by naked short selling as a perception held by public companies and their investors. The SEC described the harm as real. On October 14, 2008, for the first time, the SEC described how naked short selling inflicted harm on public companies as follows:

To the extent that fails to deliver might be part of manipulative “naked” short selling, which could be used as a tool to drive down a company’s stock price, such fails to deliver may undermine the confidence of investors. These investors, in turn, may be reluctant to commit capital to an issuer they believe to be subject to such manipulative conduct.[29]

On the same date, October 14, 2008, the SEC issued a separate release announcing another amendment to Reg SHO eliminating the options market-maker exception and narrowing the bona fide market-maker exception, all to contain naked short selling. The summary to the 2008 amendment explained the purpose of the amendment as follows:

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is adopting amendments to Regulation SHO under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). The amendments are intended to further reduce the number of persistent fails to deliver in certain equity securities by eliminating the options market-maker exception to the close-out requirement of Regulation SHO. As a result of the amendments, fails to deliver in threshold securities that result from hedging activities by options market-makers will no longer be excepted from Regulation SHO’s close-out requirement. The Commission is also providing guidance regarding bona fide market making activities for purposes of the market-maker exception to Regulation SHO’s locate requirement.[30]

Between July 15, 2008, and July 27, 2009, the SEC issued eight releases relating to amendments to Reg SHO and “naked” short selling, including some emergency orders, all intended to contain naked short selling.[31]

Had those who engage in naked short selling not chosen the investment banks as victims during the financial crisis in 2008, the scope of these violations would likely remain unknown, except of course to those who are committing them. Now that those banks are prospering again, there is little motivation for them to speak publicly about naked short selling. Many of the records sought by Plaintiff relate to the SEC’s aborted investigations of naked short selling of the investment banks (Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs) whose collapse or near collapse deepened the financial crisis.

After the SEC issued the amendments to Reg SHO and emergency amendments in 2008 and 2009, the minor administrative proceedings brought by the SEC’s Division of Enforcement again gave the impression that naked short selling was more an irritant than a serious threat to public companies. The SEC brought two classes of cases to enforce Reg SHO: one alleged intentional violations against minor market participants who used options to circumvent Reg SHO,[32] and the other alleged inadvertent and narrow violations against broker-dealers affiliated with large investment banks.[33] None of these cases hinted that the violations of Reg SHO were systemic or created a risk to the stability of the capital markets. There seemed to be a disconnect at the SEC between (1) the five SEC Commissioners who had acted expeditiously to issue half a dozen rules and emergency orders to contain naked short selling during the 2008 financial crisis and (2) the SEC’s Division of Enforcement which again reverted to its tepid enforcement of Reg SHO and the non-enforcement of the antifraud provisions of the securities acts against those engaged in naked short selling.

The conflict in the courses of action between the five Commissioners and the SEC Division of Enforcement suggests the SEC believed it could deter the market participants who engaged in naked short selling, including those who had deepened the financial crisis by contributing to the collapse or near collapse of five US based international investment banks (Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs), by strengthening the regulations prohibiting naked short selling without meaningfully enforcing those regulations, i.e., by tough words without action. In short, the numerous revisions strengthening Reg SHO and other emergency orders were the rough equivalent of the SEC repeatedly telling those engaged in naked short selling: “Don’t do that again. This time we are really serious.”

The willingness of the world’s largest brokerage firms to flout the SEC rules designed to prohibit naked short selling was established beyond doubt in the fall of 2011 when FINRA’s Department of Enforcement released its Letters of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (“AWC”), which included FINRA’s findings and conclusions, arising out of its enforcement proceedings against two of the world’s largest brokerage firms, UBS Securities, the brokerage arm of UBS Financial Services, a financial institution with $2 trillion in assets, and Credit Suisse Securities, the brokerage arm of Credit Suisse Financial Services, a financial institution with nearly $1 trillion in assets.

In its AWC with FINRA, UBS signed off on committing approximately 30 different classes of Reg SHO violations over the five-year period from January 2005 through December 2010. The total number of Reg SHO violations committed by UBS is an unknown, since the best FINRA could do in quantifying the number of UBS violations of Reg SHO was to place them in the “tens of millions.”[34] Likewise, FINRA could not fix a date when the UBS violations of Reg SHO had stopped.

The magnitude of these violations may be more easily grasped when viewed in terms of the dollar value of the phantom stock UBS created out of thin air through the naked short sales it executed. When UBS short sold stock it did not own, possess, had not borrowed, and had not arranged to borrow, it was in essence selling counterfeit stock. Under the conservative assumption that the average size of each trade was 100 shares and the average price was $10, the average transaction would have created $1,000 worth of counterfeit stock. Since UBS engaged in tens of millions of transactions creating counterfeit stock, it created counterfeit stock pretending to be worth tens of billions of dollars. By way of example only, if UBS created counterfeit stock in 50 million transactions, it would have created $50 billion worth of counterfeit stock.

As alleged above, UBS was not alone in committing massive violations of Reg SHO. In its AWC with FINRA, Credit Suisse admitted committing massive violations of Reg SHO during the four-and-a-half-year period from June 2005 through December 2010. In all, Credit Suisse also signed off on committing approximately 30classesof violations directly or indirectly relating to Reg SHO. For its part, Credit Suisse entered “more than ten million short sale orders without locates.”[35] Using the same conservative assumptions as before, Credit Suisse likely effectively created at least $10 billion in counterfeit stock. Once again, the scope and volume of the violations raise serious concerns regarding the effectiveness of the regulatory system designed to stop naked short selling.

The massive Reg SHO violations by UBS and Credit Suisse did not merely create risks of harm to public companies and their investors. The scope and magnitude of these violations of Reg SHO had the potential to destabilize the system itself. In the settlement agreement, FINRA found and UBS conceded that the “duration, scope and volume of the trading [violations] created a potential for harm to the integrity of the market (emphasis added).”[36] The only aspect of the settlement more stunning than the scope of UBS’s violations—whose sale of counterfeit stock threatened the integrity of the capital markets—was the tiny fine paid by this $2 trillion company: $12 million.

FINRA’s release of the AWCs with UBS and Credit Suisse in the fall of 2011 redefined the magnitude of counterfeit stock which giant broker-dealers could create. The number of violations–in the tens of millions—the scope of the violations–approximately 30 classes—and magnitude of the harm, which put at risk the integrity of the market, point to one simple, overarching question: how did the SEC, FINRA, and the exchanges overlook the massive UBS and Credit Suisse violations of Reg SHO for at least half a decade?

The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”), which settles and closes virtually all stock sales, supposedly also monitors those trades for violations of Reg SHO and naked short selling. The same question must be asked: How did the DTCC overlook the massive violations by UBS and Credit Suisse for at least half a decade?

Supposedly, Reg SHO should have kept UBS and Credit Suisse in check. The regulation was not untested when it became operative in January 2005. It incorporated the SEC’s enforcement experience with earlier regulations designed to curb naked short selling.[37] The SEC released the preliminary version of Reg SHO on October 28, 2003.[38] It then went through a fourteen-month trial process before it became operative on January 1, 2005. Since then, it has been refined from time to time to work out the kinks.[39] It was significantly amended in October 2008 to stop the naked shorts which were destabilizing the nation’s investment banks during the financial crisis.[40] UBS and Credit Suisse were nonetheless able to engage in massive violations of Reg SHO for years after the regulation became operative, including twenty-seven months after the 2008 amendments were supposed to have cured the flaws in Reg SHO.

The UBS and Credit Suisse cases highlight another inherent and major flaw in Reg SHO: the regulation purports to prohibit trading practices which are largely invisible to law enforcement, regulators, public companies, and market participants (except those committing the violations). The lack of transparency pervades every nook and cranny in the stock trading system as a short sale passes through it. By inadvertence or design, the lights are switched off on short sales as they are electronically processed by the executing broker, the clearing broker, the exchanges, and the DTCC. The lack of transparency continues even when the SEC and FINRA release their decisions and settlements relating to naked short selling or the enforcement of Reg SHO to the public.

The FINRA AWCs with UBS and Credit Suisse illustrate how FINRA itself shut off the lights on UBS’s and Credit Suisse’s violations. Despite the tens of millions of violations of Reg SHO admitted by UBS and Credit Suisse, not a single public company was identified as a victim of those violations. Although at least 270 UBS customers participated in those violations, none was identified. Although UBS and Credit Suisse could not have committed the Reg SHO violations without the participation of its employees, FINRA brought no proceeding against any executive or employee of either company for participating in any of the tens of millions of violations. The same is true of the SEC’s releases describing its settlements with Goldman Sachs in 2007[41] and 2010,[42] and UBS in 2011.[43] The silence surrounding the SEC’s and FINRA’s enforcement of Reg SHO violations is deafening, and that silence is inexplicable in view of the potential harm those violations can cause. Again, according to the FINRA-UBS settlement, “The duration, scope and volume of the trading created a potential for harm to the integrity of the market.”[44]

A June 2009 study, Analysis of Twenty-First Century Risks in Light of the Recent Market Collapse, commissioned by the U.S. Department of Defense addressed how the lack of transparency makes it impossible to identify those responsible for the bear raids of the nation’s investment banks during the financial crisis. The report observed:

While substantial, unusual trading activity can be identified, the source of the bear raids has not been traceable to date due to serious transparency gaps for hedge funds, trading pools, sponsored access, and sovereign wealth funds. What can be demonstrated, however, is that two relatively small broker dealers emerged virtually overnight to trade “trillions of dollars worth of U.S. blue chip companies. They are the number one traders in all financial companies that collapsed or are now financially supported by the U.S. government. Trading by the firms has grown exponentially while the markets have lost trillions of dollars in value” (emphasis in the original).[45]

Naked short selling occurs in the shadows, where it is too dark to see. It is dark because the government, the SROs, and exchanges who have the duty to regulate short sales have turned off the lights where this trading occurs. The light with the highest wattage was switched off by the DTCC. The DTCC has a virtual monopoly in clearing and settling all the stock trades in the U.S., with the exception of internalized trades which broker-dealers need not report to it. The DTCC refuses to provide public companies with any useful information regarding violations of Reg SHO and naked short selling, unless it is ordered to do so by a court. As a private institution, the DTCC is not subject to FOIA. Consequently, absent a court order, every window into the DTCC is shuttered from the view of every public company. With his complaint, Plaintiff seeks records of the SEC’s five-year investigation of the DTCC for aiding and abetting violations of Reg SHO and naked short selling.

Virtually no useful information relevant to Reg SHO violations is available from the exchanges and trade reporting facilities. Only the NASDAQ exchange, where only a tiny fraction of the stock of public companies is traded, provides any meaningful information to public companies, the public or journalists. Further, since NASDAQ is the most “lit” trading center, a fact well known to those who engage in naked short selling, it is not their favorite venue. As noted in a 2012 academic study, broker-dealers and their customers prefer more user-friendly venues where the rules are ignored so price manipulation through naked short sales can flourish,[46] like the Chicago Board Options Exchange.[47] Not surprisingly, the largest number of short sales are conducted over the FINRA TRF, which has the least visibility of all of the trading centers.

As the facts demonstrate, the system itself is designed so public companies, investors and other market participants can never know whether they are being victimized by naked short selling. The words of Ferdinand Pecora (whose investigation of Wall Street after the 1929 crash led to the creation of the SEC) ring as true today as they did in 1939 when he first uttered them: “The Public was always in the dark. It could not tell whether sales were due merely to the ‘free play of supply and demand,’ or whether they were the product of manipulated activities…It all looks alike on the ticker(emphasis added).”[48]

The lack of transparency creates multiple obstacles for investors and public companies to determine whether a stock trade is an unlawful naked short sale. None of the fifteen exchanges or trade reporting facilities identifies the market participant who engaged in a short sale. Likewise, no trading center or exchange releases information relevant to whether a short sale was executed within an exemption to Rule 203.

Assuming someone harmed by a naked short sale could ascertain that the trade was a short sale, the seller had not borrowed the stock, the market-maker exemption did not apply, and the identity of the short seller, there would still be no violation of Rule 203 if the short seller believed he could borrow the stock, which is nearly impossible to verify. No regulator even purports to track whether a market participant has located stock to borrow before executing a sale.

A case filed and settled by the SEC in June 2013, In the Matter of Chicago Board Options Exchange,[49] offers insight into why the exchanges are so reluctant to provide public companies with any information relating to short sales. Simply put, the Chicago Board Options Exchange (“CBOE”) was profiting on the illegal short sales. These are some of the relevant facts which the SEC alleged and the CBOE admitted:

Not only did [the CBOE] fail to enforce the Commission’s rules by not adequately investigating a member firm’s compliance with Regulation SHO of the Exchange Act (“Reg. SHO”), CBOE’s conduct also interfered with the Commission’s Division of Enforcement (“Enforcement Division”) staff’s Reg. SHO investigation of the same member firm. This conduct was egregious. CBOE assisted that member firm by taking the unprecedented step of providing information for, and edits to, the member firm’s Wells submission to the Commission ─ even more troubling, the information and edits provided by CBOE resulted in the member firm providing the Commission with inaccurate and misleading information. When questioned by Enforcement Division staff about the underlying matter, CBOE failed to disclose that it had assisted the member firm with its Wells submission. CBOE also failed to enforce Reg. SHO because it employed a Reg. SHO surveillance program that failed to detect a single violation, despite numerous red flags that its members engaged in violative conduct.[50]

As a SRO, the CBOE was obligated to enforce its members’ compliance with the federal securities laws and rules, including Reg SHO. In effect, the CBOE was a deputy of the SEC. However, instead of enforcing Reg SHO, the CBOE closed its eyes to hundreds of millions of dollars in naked short sales consummated by one of its members, optionsXpress (a subsidiary of Charles Schwab) and some of optionsXpress’ biggest customers in 25 public companies and then the CBOE tried to obstruct the SEC’s investigation.[51]

The SEC’s release on the CBOE’s failure to enforce Reg SHO and subsequent efforts to obstruct the SEC’s investigation pointed to the reason the CBOE was behaving in this way:

CBOE’s Regulatory Services Division is responsible for enforcing the federal securities laws and regulations and CBOE rules. Until recently, CBOE had no formal policies separating its Regulatory Services Division from its business side, which was responsible for CBOE’s income generation. In fact, until recently, CBOE’s Chief Regulatory Officer reported up to a senior business executive. As a result, the line between business and regulation became blurred.[52]

The violations the CBOE had permitted optionsXpress to commit were not merely violations of Reg SHO. In a separate case, the first of its kind, SEC Chief Administrative Law Judge Brenda Murray found that the naked short sales by the optionsXpress cabal constituted violations of the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10(b)(5) and 10(b)-21.[53] The CBOE had closed its eyes to the fraudulent naked short sales by one of its members and then tried to obstruct the SEC’s investigation of the fraud.

The optionsXpressdecision found the optionsXpress cabal had designed a fraudulent scheme using options to circumvent the stock delivery requirements of Reg SHO Rule 204. But broker-dealers and market participants who engage in naked short selling do not have to resort to fraud to circumvent the Rule 204 stock delivery requirements. Other terms of Rule 204 create an exception to its delivery requirements, perhaps more accurately perceived as a huge loophole. Whether exception or loophole, the effect is the same: the huge void in Rule 204 in effect converts the rule into an honor code. To understand how this exception-loophole emasculates Rule 204, some understanding of Rule 204’s moving parts may be helpful.

In essence, Rule 204 is supposed to prevent short term naked shorts from becoming long term naked shorts. To that end, it requires delivery of the stock in three days[54] for non-market-makers and six days[55] for market-makers. As alleged above, the SEC issued Rule 204 at the height of the financial crisis, after three investment banks (Bear Sterns, Merrill Lynch and Lehman Brothers) had failed and Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs were teetering on the edge of failure.

Regulators, broker-dealers and market participants commonly refer to the huge loophole in Rule 204 with a comforting euphemism: “internalization.” As a practical matter, it is more accurate to think of it as a de facto exception to Rule 204. It allows executing and clearing brokers to happily engage in naked short selling, so long as neither party tattles on the other. With billions to be made, tattling is extremely rare.

In the official lexicon, “internalization” occurs where broker-dealers execute client trades as agents or principals within their own trading system.[56] These internalized trades are not reported to the DTCC, and thus the DTCC will never know whether the trade resulted in a failure to deliver. The DTCC has repeatedly informed the SEC that it recognizes this exception.[57] On this point, its fourth quarter June 2006 Rule 19b-4 filing stated:

Trades executed in the normal course of business between a Member that clears for other broker/dealers, and its correspondent, or between correspondents of the Member, which correspondent(s) is not itself a Member and settles such obligations through such clearing Member (“internalized trades”) are not required to be submitted to the Corporation and shall not be considered to violate the “pre-netting” prohibition.[58]

A DTCC white paper has defined internalization in even broader terms than described in the DTCC’s Rule 19b-4 filings with the SEC. It defined the term as follows:

Internalization, for purposes of this paper, is the execution of separate correspondents’ trades by a clearing broker within its own record keeping system, and the related practice of failing to submit trade data on these “internalized” trades to the clearing corporation, so that not all activity is reported to the clearing corporation. For example, a clearing broker has a correspondent relationship with two separate broker dealers. One correspondent enters into a transaction with another correspondent of the same NSCC member. In effect, one correspondent is short and one is long. The NSCC member, however, is net flat for the transaction. The member clears the activity internally and does not report it for clearance at NSCC.[59]

The same DTCC paper went on to discuss the risks of internalization:

Internalization and summarization (a first cousin of internalization) have come into play recently because while these trade data submission techniques enable members to reduce their trade recording and clearing fees, these practices also introduce new clearing risks because all trades are not submitted for clearance and because correspondent broker activity may not be reported accurately.[60]

As pointed out in the DTCC white paper, internalization introduces new risks that “broker activity may not be reported accurately.” A FINRA disciplinary action fleshes out a little how the “broker activity may not be reported accurately” in the 2012 case:

The findings stated that in each instance of the fictitious loans, Luerman falsely stated that one of the various financial institutions that frequently loaned securities to the firm was the counterparty and had agreed to the fictitious transaction. For each of the fictitious transactions, Luerman also invented and reported a false lending fee. The firm did not receive any securities in connection with the fictitious transactions, and the firm’ systems automatically cancelled these transactions.[61]

The phony booking of loans between broker-dealers is not the exclusive territory of small fry. The big players do this more astutely. In Overstock.com v. Morgan Stanley,[62]attorneys for Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch accidentally released excerpts of emails written by Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch employees. These emails offer a window into how the big broker-dealers play the game: One Merrill Lynch executive suggests the firm “might want to consider allowing…customers to fail,” to which a colleague replies: “We are going to look into that.” Another asks: “How and when can we prevent the delivery [of shares]?” In another e-mail he requests an update from a lieutenant on “how we are going to fix fails and I want to know what we nees [sic] to do to make 369 market-makers fail.” In response to a question from a large client about efforts at “cleaning up” fails, a Goldman Sachs employee says that “we will let you fail.” In another message, he refers to a senior colleague “really backing down from…cleaning up fails.”… The e-mails also suggest close commercial links between the two firms [Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs]… [63]

In essence, the internalized trades include all trades except those traded over an exchange or traded through pools. These internalized trades and the trades executed in dark pools, are reported through the FINRA Trade Reporting Facility (“TRF”). Like the internalized trades, the trades executed in dark pools, as their name suggests, have no transparency. Both the internalized trades and the trades executed in dark pools create an enormous hole in Rule 204.

As the case with Rule 203, there is little transparency whether broker-dealers comply with Rule 204. The transparency boils down to a list published by the SEC every two weeks identifying the public companies that have had failures to deliver and the amount of those failures.[64] No other information, e.g. the identity of the broker-dealer who failed to deliver the stock, is disclosed. Of course, this does not include all the fail-to-deliver trades that are hidden by “internalization.”

The SEC has direct responsibility for creating numerous flaws in Reg SHO, the creation of market rules which cloak in darkness every step in the process of a short sale trade, and, of course, its lax and discriminatory enforcement of Reg SHO (serious prosecutions of tiny market participants and mild rebukes to the mega brokerage firms).

The multiple flaws in Reg SHO, the lack of transparency in short sale trading and the SEC’s lax enforcement have combined to make compliance with Reg SHO a form of self-regulation. The notion that Wall Street banks and hedge funds can self-regulate was disproved in 1929 and again in 2008.

Plaintiff has filed this complaint, because the SEC has flaunted his FOIA requests, which seek records relating to the SEC’s purported efforts to investigate and civilly prosecute those who engage in naked short selling. By way of example, Plaintiff’s FOIA requests have sought records of the SEC’s administrative proceeding against optionsXpress, In the Matter of optionsXpress.[65] For the first time, in that case the SEC alleged and proved that optionsXpress (a broker-dealer), one of its highest officers, and one of its biggest customers committed securities fraud by engaging in naked short sales. Yet, the SEC has refused to release the transcripts of the public hearing or any of the documents admitted into evidence.

In another of those requests which are the subject matter of the complaint, Plaintiff sought records relating to an investigation of the DTCC for possible violations of Reg SHO. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the SEC conducted a six-year formal investigation of the DTCC in connection with its possible participation in naked short selling. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the SEC has eighteen storage boxes relating to its investigation of the DTCC which are responsive to Plaintiff’s requests. The SEC has failed to release any of these records.

The SEC has failed to release records sought by Plaintiff’s 26 FOIA requests relating to (1) the SEC’s matters under inquiry, investigations and administrative proceedings of those suspected of engaging in naked short selling or aiding and abetting the violation and (2) the SEC’s matters under inquiry, investigations and administrative proceedings of those victimized by naked short selling. In this way, another regulator, this time the SEC, switched off the lights which could bring some visibility to the shadows where naked short selling has flourished and continues to threaten the integrity of the capital markets themselves, according to FINRA.[66]

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following RECORDS relating to In The Matter of Peter J. Bottini and Kevin E. Strine, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-14848, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 710:

All transcripts of any hearings during said administrative proceeding;

All documents or other writings filed by either the SEC or the respondents in said administrative proceeding;

All exhibits attached to any filing by the SEC or the respondents during said administrative proceeding;

All transcripts of any testimony taken during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding; and

All exhibits marked or identified during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding.

A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 1.

By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 1 and assigned it tracking number 14-02120-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 2.

Exhibit 2 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02120-FOIA.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following RECORDS relating to In the Matter of Rhino Trading, LLC, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-13677, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 60941:

a) All transcripts of any hearings during said administrative proceeding;

b) All documents or other writings filed by either the SEC or the respondents in said administrative proceeding;

c) All exhibits attached to any filing by the SEC or the respondents during said administrative proceeding;

d) All transcripts of any testimony taken during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding; and

e) All exhibits marked or identified during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding.

A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.

By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 3 and assigned it tracking number 14-02121-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.

Exhibit 4 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02121-FOIA.

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following RECORDS relating to In the Matter of Jeffrey A. Wolfson, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-14726, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 67451:

a) All transcripts of any hearings during said administrative proceeding;

b) All documents or other writings filed by either the SEC or the respondents in said administrative proceeding;

c) All exhibits attached to any filing by the SEC or the respondents during said administrative proceeding;

d) All transcripts of any testimony taken during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding; and

e) All exhibits marked or identified during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding.

A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 5.

By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 5 and assigned it tracking number 14-02122-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 6.

Exhibit 6 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02122-FOIA.

FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

100. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS received or generated by the SEC in any matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION relating to possible violations of Regulation SHO, for the naked short sale of any stock, or for failures to deliver any securities from January 1, 2007, to the present. These MUIs or investigations can be identified by doing a search of the CATS, its replacement, or any other system maintaining a list of SEC investigations using the search terms “Regulation SHO,” “Reg SHO,” “Rule 203,” “Rule 204,” “naked short,” “naked shorts,” or any other terms commonly used within the SEC in referring to MUIs or investigations relating to violations of Regulation SHO.

101. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 7.

102. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 7 and assigned it tracking number 14-02123-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 8.

103. Exhibit 8 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02123-FOIA.

FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

104. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following RECORDS relating to In the Matter of Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P., Respondent, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-13877, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 62025:

a) All transcripts of any hearings during said administrative proceeding;

b) All documents or other writings filed by either the SEC or the respondents in said administrative proceeding;

c) All exhibits attached to any filing by the SEC or the respondents during said administrative proceeding;

d) All transcripts of any testimony taken during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding; and

e) All exhibits marked or identified during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding.

105. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 9.

106. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 9 and assigned it tracking number 14-02124-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.

107. Exhibit 10 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02124-FOIA.

SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

108. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following RECORDS relating to In the Matter of TJM Proprietary Trading, LLC, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-13569, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 60440:

a) All transcripts of any hearings during said administrative proceeding;

b) All documents or other writings filed by either the SEC or the respondents in said administrative proceeding;

c) All exhibits attached to any filing by the SEC or the respondents during said administrative proceeding;

d) All transcripts of any testimony taken during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding; and

e) All exhibits marked or identified during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding.

109. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 11.

110. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 11 and assigned it tracking number 14-02125-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 12.

111. By letter of April 22, 2014, the SEC’s FOIA Office notified Plaintiff that it had not located or identified “any information responsive to [Plaintiff’s] request”. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 13.

112. By letter of April 22, 2014, Plaintiff appealed the FOIA Office’s decision regarding request 14-02125-FOIA (Exhibit 13). A true and correct copy of said appeal, without enclosures, is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 14.

113. By letter of April 23, 2014, the FOIA Office acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff’s appeal (Exhibit 14) and assigned it tracking number 14-00167-APPS. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 15. Exhibit 15 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the FOIA Office regarding FOIA Request 14-02125-FOIA or its appeal.

SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

114. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following All RECORDS of any INVESTIGATION or matter under inquiry (MUI) relating to Sam Antar, Barry Minkow, the Fraud Discovery Institute, or WhiteCollarFraud.com from January 1, 2008, to the present.

This request is limited to RECORDS maintained in a MUI, INVESTIGATION, administrative proceeding or civil action where Sam Antar, Barry Minkow, the Fraud Discovery Institute, or WhiteCollarFraud.com was a subject of the MUI, investigation, administrative proceeding or civil action.

115. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 16.

116. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 16 and assigned the portion of the request regarding Sam Antar tracking number 14-02126-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 17.

117. Exhibit 17 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02126-FOIA.

EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION

118. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following All RECORDS of any INVESTIGATION or matter under inquiry (MUI) relating to Sam Antar, Barry Minkow, the Fraud Discovery Institute, or WhiteCollarFraud.com from January 1, 2008, to the present.

This request is limited to RECORDS maintained in a MUI, INVESTIGATION, administrative proceeding or civil action where Sam Antar, Barry Minkow, the Fraud Discovery Institute, or WhiteCollarFraud.com was a subject of the MUI, investigation, administrative proceeding or civil action.

119. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 16.

120. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 16 and assigned the portion of the request regarding Barry Minkow tracking number 14-02127-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 18.

121. Exhibit 18 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02127-FOIA.

NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION

122. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following All RECORDS of any INVESTIGATION or matter under inquiry (MUI) relating to Sam Antar, Barry Minkow, the Fraud Discovery Institute, or WhiteCollarFraud.com from January 1, 2008, to the present.

This request is limited to RECORDS maintained in a MUI, INVESTIGATION, administrative proceeding or civil action where Sam Antar, Barry Minkow, the Fraud Discovery Institute, or WhiteCollarFraud.com was a subject of the MUI, investigation, administrative proceeding or civil action.

123. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 16.

124. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 16 and assigned the portion of the request regarding Fraud Discovery Institute tracking number 14-02128-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 19.

125. Exhibit 19 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02128-FOIA.

TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

126. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following All RECORDS of any INVESTIGATION or matter under inquiry (MUI) relating to Sam Antar, Barry Minkow, the Fraud Discovery Institute, or WhiteCollarFraud.com from January 1, 2008, to the present.

This request is limited to RECORDS maintained in a MUI, INVESTIGATION, administrative proceeding or civil action where Sam Antar, Barry Minkow, the Fraud Discovery Institute, or WhiteCollarFraud.com was a subject of the MUI, investigation, administrative proceeding or civil action.

127. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 16.

128. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 16 and assigned the portion of the request regarding WhiteCollarFraud.com tracking number 14-02129-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 20.

129. Exhibit 20 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02129-FOIA.

ELEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

130. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following RECORDS relating to In the Matter of Hazan Capital Management, LLC, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-13570, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 60441:

a) All transcripts of any hearings during said administrative proceeding;

b) All documents or other writings filed by either the SEC or the respondents in said administrative proceeding;

c) All exhibits attached to any filing by the SEC or the respondents during said administrative proceeding;

d) All transcripts of any testimony taken during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding; and

e) All exhibits marked or identified during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding.

131. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 21.

132. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 21 and assigned it tracking number 14-02130-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 22.

133. Exhibit 22 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02130-FOIA.

TWELFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

134. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following RECORDS relating to In the Matter of UBS Securities LLC, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-14620, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 65733:

a) All transcripts of any hearings during said administrative proceeding;

b) All documents or other writings filed by either the SEC or the respondents in said administrative proceeding;

c) All exhibits attached to any filing by the SEC or the respondents during said administrative proceeding;

d) All transcripts of any testimony taken during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding; and

e) All exhibits marked or identified during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding.

135. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 23.

136. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 23 and assigned it tracking number 14-02131-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 24.

137. Exhibit 24 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02131-FOIA.

THIRTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

138. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following RECORDS relating to In the Matter of OptionsXpress, Inc., Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-14848, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 710:

a) All transcripts of any hearings during said administrative proceeding;

b) All documents or other writings filed by either the SEC or the respondents in said administrative proceeding;

c) All exhibits attached to any filing by the SEC or the respondents during said administrative proceeding;

d) All transcripts of any testimony taken during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding; and

e) All exhibits marked or identified during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding.

139. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 25.

140. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 25 and assigned it tracking number 14-02132-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 26.

141. Exhibit 26 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02132-FOIA.

FOURTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

142. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying the following RECORDS relating to In The Matter of Gary S. Bell, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-14660, Securities And Exchange Commission, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 65941:

a) All transcripts of any hearings during said administrative proceeding;

b) All documents or other writings filed by either the SEC or the respondents in said administrative proceeding;

c) All exhibits attached to any filing by the SEC or the respondents during said administrative proceeding;

d) All transcripts of any testimony taken during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding; and

e) All exhibits marked or identified during the MUI, informal investigation or formal investigation that occurred prior to the commencement of said administrative proceeding.

143. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 27.

144. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 27 and assigned it tracking number 14-02133-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 28.

145. Exhibit 28 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02133-FOIA.

FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

146. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS relating to any matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION of Wedbush Securities for possible violations of Regulation SHO and/or naked short selling since January 1, 2009, to the present.

147. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 29.

148. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 29 and assigned it tracking number 14-02134-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 30.

149. By letter of March 4, 2014, the FOIA Office informed Plaintiff that it had “located 194 pages of records, of which 175 pages are released in full or in part, and the other 19 pages are withheld in full. The withheld records are exempt from release under Exemptions 4, 5, 6, 7(A) and/or 7(C), 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4), (5), (6), (7)(A) and/or (7)(C), 17 CFR § 200.80(b)(4), (5), (6), (7)(A) and/or (7)(iii),…” A true and correct copy of the March 4, 2014, letter from the FOIA Office, without enclosures, is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 31.

150. By letter of March 5, 2014, Plaintiff appealed the FOIA Office’s decision regarding request 14-02134-FOIA (Exhibit 31). A true and correct copy of said appeal, without enclosures, is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 32.

151. By letter of March 13, 2014, the FOIA Office acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff’s appeal (Exhibit 32) and assigned it tracking number 14-00044-APPS. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 33. Exhibit 33 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the FOIA Office regarding FOIA Request 14-02134-FOIA or its appeal.

SIXTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

152. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS of any SEC matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION of Global Securities involving possible naked shorting or violations of Regulation SHO by Global Securities from January 1, 2008, to the present.

This request is limited to RECORDS maintained in a MUI and/or INVESTIGATION relating to Global Securities from January 1, 200, to the present.

153. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 34.

154. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 34 and assigned it tracking number 14-02135-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 35.

155. By letter of January 22, 2014, the FOIA Office informed Plaintiff that it had not located or identified “any records responsive to [Plaintiff’s] request.” A true and correct copy of the January 22, 2014, letter from the FOIA Office is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 36.

156. By letter of January 22, 2014, Plaintiff appealed the FOIA Office’s decision regarding request 14-02135-FOIA (Exhibit 36). A true and correct copy of said appeal, without enclosures, is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 37.

157. By letter of January 29, 2014, the FOIA Office acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff’s appeal (Exhibit 37) and assigned it tracking number 14-00027-APPS. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 38.

158. By letter of March 6, 2014, Associate General Counsel Richard M. Humes denied Plaintiff’s appeal regarding FOIA Request 12-02135-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 39.

SEVENTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

159. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS relating to any matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION of any individual or business entity in connection to possible violations of Regulation SHO and/or naked short selling in relation to Morgan Stanley during 2008.

160. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 40.

161. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 40 and assigned it tracking number 14-02136-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 41.

162. Exhibit 41 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02136-FOIA.

EIGHTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

163. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS relating to any matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION of any individual or business entity in connection to possible violations of Regulation SHO and/or naked short selling in relation to Merrill Lynch during 2008.

164. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 42.

165. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 42 and assigned it tracking number 14-02137-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 43.

166. Exhibit 43 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02137-FOIA.

NINETEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

167. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS relating to any matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION of any individual or business entity in connection to possible violations of Regulation SHO and/or naked short selling in relation to Lehman Brothers during 2008.

168. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 44.

169. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 44 and assigned it tracking number 14-02138-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 45.

170. Exhibit 45 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02138-FOIA.

TWENTIETH CAUSE OF ACTION

171. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS relating to any matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION of Citadel Securities for possible violations of Regulation SHO and/or naked short selling since January 1, 2009, to the present.

172. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 46.

173. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 46 and assigned it tracking number 14-02139-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 47.

174. By letter of April 21, 2014, the FOIA Office informed Plaintiff that it had not located or identified “any records responsive to [Plaintiff’s] request.” A true and correct copy of the April 21, 2014, letter from the FOIA Office is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 48.

175. By letter of April 22, 2014, Plaintiff appealed the FOIA Office’s decision regarding request 14-02139-FOIA (Exhibit 48). A true and correct copy of said appeal, without enclosures, is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 49.

By letter of April 23, 2014, the FOIA Office acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff’s appeal (Exhibit 49) and assigned it tracking number 14-00169-APPS. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 50.

177. Exhibit 50 is the last communication Plaintiff has had from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02139-FOIA.

TWENTY-FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

178. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS relating to any matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION of any individual or business entity in connection to possible violations of Regulation SHO and/or naked short selling in relation to Bear Stearns during 2008.

179. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 51.

180. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 51 and assigned it tracking number 14-02140-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 52.

181. Exhibit 52 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02140-FOIA.

TWENTY-SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

182. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS relating to any matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION of Knight Capital for possible violations of Regulation SHO and/or naked short selling since January 1, 2009, to the present.

183. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 53.

184. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 53 and assigned it tracking number 14-02141-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 54.

185. Exhibit 54 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02141-FOIA.

TWENTY-THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

186. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA and the Privacy Act, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS or COMMUNICATIONS from January 1, 2006, to the present, relating to any exemption from, exception to, or non-application of Regulation SHO to Al Safi Trust in whole or in part or any preferred status of Al Safi Trust under regulation SHO.

187. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 55.

188. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 55 and assigned it tracking number 14-02142-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 56.

189. By letter of April 3, 2014, the FOIA Office informed Plaintiff that it had not located or identified “any records responsive to [Plaintiff’s] request.” A true and correct copy of the April 3, 2014, letter from the FOIA Office is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 57.

190. By letter of April 10, 2014, Plaintiff appealed the FOIA Office’s decision regarding request 14-02142-FOIA (Exhibit 57). A true and correct copy of said appeal, without enclosures, is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 58.

191. By letter of April 11, 2014, the FOIA Office acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff’s appeal (Exhibit 58) and assigned it tracking number 14-00137-APPS. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 59.

192. By letter of April 28, 2014, Associate General Counsel Richard M. Humes denied Plaintiff’s appeal regarding FOIA Request 12-02142-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 60.

TWENTY-FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

193. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS of any SEC matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION of Penson Financial and/or Wedbush (or any of its previous names) involving possible naked shorting or violations of Regulation SHO by Penson Financial and/or Wedbush from January 1, 2008, to the present.

This request is limited to RECORDS maintained in a MUI and/or INVESTIGATION relating to Penson Financial and/or Wedbush (or any of its previous names) from January 1, 2008, to the present.

194. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 61.

195. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 61 and assigned tracking number 14-02143-FOIA to the portion of the request regarding Penson Financial. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 62.

196. By letter of February 5, 2014, the FOIA Office informed Plaintiff that it was “withholding records responsive to [Plaintiff’s] request under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A), 17 CFR § 200.80 (b)(7)(i).” A true and correct copy of the February 5, 2014, letter from the FOIA Office is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 63.

197. By letter of February 12, 2014, Plaintiff appealed the FOIA Office’s decision regarding request 14-02143-FOIA (Exhibit 63). A true and correct copy of said appeal, without enclosures, is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 64.

198. By letter of February 19, 2014, the FOIA Office acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff’s appeal (Exhibit 64) and assigned it tracking number 14-00037-APPS. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 65. Exhibit 65 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02143-FOIA.

TWENTY-FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

199. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS of any SEC matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION of Penson Financial and/or Wedbush (or any of its previous names) involving possible naked shorting or violations of Regulation SHO by Penson Financial and/or Wedbush from January 1, 2008, to the present.

This request is limited to RECORDS maintained in a MUI and/or INVESTIGATION relating to Penson Financial and/or Wedbush (or any of its previous names) from January 1, 2008, to the present.

200. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 61.

201. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 61 and assigned tracking number 14-02144-FOIA to the portion of the request regarding Wedbush. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 66.

202. By letter of March 4, 2014, the FOIA Office informed Plaintiff that “all records responsive to this request have been processed and provided to you in response to FOIA request 14-02134-FOIA.” A true and correct copy of the March 4, 2014, letter from the FOIA Office is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 67.

203. By letter of March 5, 2014, Plaintiff appealed the FOIA Office’s decision regarding request 14-02144-FOIA (Exhibit 67). A true and correct copy of said appeal, without enclosures, is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 68.

204. By letter of March 13, 2014, the FOIA Office acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff’s appeal (Exhibit 68) and assigned it tracking number 14-00043-APPS. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 69. Exhibit 69 is the last communication Plaintiff has received from the SEC regarding FOIA request 14-02144-FOIA.

TWENTY-SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

205. By letter of November 29, 2013, pursuant to the applicable provisions of FOIA, Plaintiff requested access to and copies of specified documents as follows:

I am requesting that you release for inspection and copying all RECORDS of any matter under inquiry (MUI) or INVESTIGATION which became SEC investigation HO-09973. All RECORDS of any SEC MUI or INVESTIGATION of Adnan Khashoggi/Genesis Intermedia for possible naked shorting or violations of Regulation SHO by Adnan Khashoggi/Genesis Intermedia from January 1, 2008, to the present.

This request is limited to RECORDS maintained in a MUI and/or INVESTIGATION relating to Adnan Khashoggi/Genesis Intermedia from January 1, 2008, to the present.

206. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 70.

207. By letter of December 3, 2013, the SEC’s FOIA office acknowledged receipt of Exhibit 70 and assigned it tracking number 14-02145-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 71.

208. By letter of March 4, 2014, the FOIA Office informed Plaintiff that it had not located or identified “any records responsive to [Plaintiff’s request.” A true and correct copy of the March 4, 2014, letter from the FOIA Office is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 72.

209. By letter of March 5, 2014, Plaintiff appealed the FOIA Office’s decision regarding request 14-02145-FOIA (Exhibit 72). A true and correct copy of said appeal, without enclosures, is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 73.

210. By letter of March 13, 2014, the FOIA Office acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff’s appeal (Exhibit 73) and assigned it tracking number 14-00042-APPS. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 74.

211. By letter of May 13, 2014, Associate General Counsel Richard M. Humes denied Plaintiff’s appeal regarding FOIA Request 12-02145-FOIA. A true and correct copy of said letter is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 75.

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR RELIEF: VIOLATIONS OF FOIA

212. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.

213. Plaintiff is entitled by law to access the records requested under the FOIA.

214. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully comply with paragraphs a through e of Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for the records (Exhibit 1), as specified in paragraph 88 above.

215. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill paragraphs a through e of Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 3) as specified in paragraph 92 above.

216. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill paragraphs a through e of Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 5) as specified in paragraph 96 above.

217. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 7) as specified in paragraph 100 above.

218. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill paragraphs a through e of Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 9) as specified in paragraph 104 above.

219. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill paragraphs a through e of Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 11) as specified in paragraph 108 above.

220. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 16) as specified in paragraphs 114, 118, 122, and 126 above.

221. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill paragraphs a through e of Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 21) as specified in paragraph 130 above.

222. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill paragraphs a through e of Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 23) as specified in paragraph 134 above.

223. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill paragraphs a through e of Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 25) as specified in paragraph 138 above.

224. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill paragraphs a through e of Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 27) as specified in paragraph 142 above.

225. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 29) as specified in paragraph 146 above.

226. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 34) as specified in paragraph 152 above.

227. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 40) as specified in paragraph 159 above.

228. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 42) as specified in paragraph 163 above.

229. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 44) as specified in paragraph 167 above.

230. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 46) as specified in paragraph 171 above.

231. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 51) as specified in paragraph 178 above.

232. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 53) as specified in paragraph 182 above.

233. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 55) as specified in paragraph 186 above.

234. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 61) as specified in paragraphs 193 and 199 above.

235. Defendant SEC is in violation of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by failing to fully and lawfully fulfill paragraphs a through e of Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013, request for records (Exhibit 70) as specified in paragraph 205 above.

[4] There were a few, very brief articles indicating that UBS had violated Reg SHO, but none offered a clue of the magnitude of the violations or their potential impact on market integrity. See for example: FINRA Fines UBS $12M for Alleged Short-Sale Violations, Dow Jones News Service, Oct. 25, 2011.

[7] Irving M. Pollack joined the SEC staff in 1946 and was Director of the Division of Enforcement beginning in Sep. 1972. In Feb. 1974, Mr. Pollack began to serve as Commissioner, filling the unexpired term of Hugh F. Owens who resigned. He continued as Commissioner until 1980.

Although “naked short selling” is not a defined term in the federal securities laws, the Commission has taken regulatory action to reduce short selling abuses. See Short Sales, Exchange Act Rel. No. 50103 (Aug. 6, 2004), 83 SEC Docket 1492, 1493 (noting that location and delivery requirements of Regulation SHO “will act as a restriction on so-called ‘naked’ short selling”)

(b) Short sales. (1) A broker or dealer may not accept a short sale order in an equity security from another person, or effect a short sale in an equity security for its own account, unless the broker or dealer has:

(i) Borrowed the security, or entered into a bona-fide arrangement to borrow the security; or

(ii) Reasonable grounds to believe that the security can be borrowed so that it can be delivered on the date delivery is due; and

[20] “Any investigating commission must examine the role of short selling, especially naked short selling, in deepening the crisis. Did short selling ultimately cause the collapse of Bear Stearns Cos., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and the near death of American International Group Inc.?” Keeping Markets Vital, Pensions and Investments, Sep. 29, 2008, available at http://www.pionline.com/article/20080929/PRINT/309299985/keeping-markets-vital (last visited May 21, 2014).

[21] “Investors like Hardesty contend that naked short-selling, if left unchecked, would have given hedge funds and other aggressive short sellers an unfair advantage to attack other victims after Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch…were said to be among the likely targets.” Naked Short-Selling Blamed in Wall St Crisis, The New Zealand Herald, Sep. 16, 2008, available at http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10532426&ref=rss (last visited May 21, 2014).

Lehman’s demise was brought on by many destabilizing factors — the collapse of the real estate market, naked short attacks, false rumors, widening spreads on credit default swaps, rating agency downgrades, a loss of confidence by clients and counterparties, and buyers sitting on the sidelines waiting for an assisted deal.

[34] The agreement repeatedly states that some of the violations lasted at least until December 2010. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent No. 20080144511, (“UBS settlement”) available at http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@enf/@ad/documents/industry/p124887.pdf.

The options market, like other securities markets, operates on the understanding that sellers of securities will settle with delivery on the required date. Feldman’s actions constitute fraud because by writing calls he represented to the market as a whole and to purchasers of his deep-in-the-money calls that he was going to make delivery if his calls were exercised and assigned when he had no intention of doing so, and, in fact, by entering buy-writes, he did not cover his short position.

The first half of a given month is available at the end of the month. The second half of a given month is available at about the 15th of the next month. We cannot guarantee that the data will be posted by a particular date. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data.

298 Replies to “Deep Capture Files Major Lawsuit Against the SEC”

In Friday’s silver COT Report, the technical funds added more than 4,300 new Comex short contracts, on top of the near 5,200 shorts they added last week.

At more than 42,800 contracts short, the technical funds have added an astounding 33,000 short contracts since the end of February, the equivalent of 165 million oz of silver.

To put the price impact of the equivalent 165 million oz in proper perspective, please consider that both the Hunt Brothers and Warren Buffet bought less than this amount in causing silver prices to explode.

How could 165 million oz sold in a few months not have the same effect to the downside?

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2014/34-72340.pdf
…3. As alleged below, Wedbush failed to adopt and implement risk management controls that were reasonably designed to ensure compliance with applicable regulatory requirements—such as those for preventing naked short sales, wash trades, manipulative layering and money laundering. Wedbush’s failure to adopt and implement such controls came after communications by the Commission’s staff through an examination deficiency letter and in face-to-face meetings regarding Wedbush’s compliance procedures whereby the staff informed Wedbush of compliance shortcomings and significant compliance concerns, particularly the access provided to unknown overseas traders. By nonetheless failing to adopt and implement the necessary risk management controls, Wedbush willfully violated the Market Access Rule, while Bell and Fillhart caused Wedbush’s violation of the Rule by virtue of their responsibilities at the firm and their participation in communications with the Commission’s staff. …

Hope this isn’t a case of closing the barn door after all the horses escape ……Seems to me this action should have been taken years ago while Cox was still in office. What judge would even consider let alone fathom the depths of this abuse and corruption , especially an honest one if there is such a thing. What damages could be sought and what would they be based on ? Don’t get me wrong, I applaud the gesture but find it a bit untimely although it begs to addressed…My sincere best wishes for a trial and discovery …

Mark, Thank you for your Gallant Endeavor against the Corruption of Wall Street and the politicians. Finally to get Dendreon out of the claws of Michael Milkin and wall street, to release this long over due drug to humanity. To all of the millions who have died needlessly and to all that are suffering now all over greed. Cancer this terrible infliction and what the future possibilities are with this promising T cell technology. Please lets Thank all of the researchers who also endeavored all of the obstacles and perseverance to develop this T cell therapy. To the Author of Deep capture who had the courage to write the truth and all of the others who came forward.
Thank you all

Best of luck with exposing the truth about naked short selling, it is a long-time coming. Having Gary Aguirre on your side as a SEC insider should bode well. The damage done to investor confidence from naked shorting is not easily restored. The capital markets have suffered dearly as many main street investors have shied away from stock investing. To see Wall Street firms like Goldman Sachs get away with running companies like WAMU into near collapse and go unpunished has to be stopped. Kudos to Deep Capture for standing up for the small investor.

Through corrupt trade practices, the COMEX has stolen and captured the pricing mechanism for gold, silver and copper away from the influence of actual supply and demand fundamentals.

Replacing the law of supply and demand as the price determinant, the COMEX has substituted a private club run by a few large traders who, in turn, dictate prices to metal producers, consumers and investors.

The federal commodities regulator, the CFTC, is complicit in the price capturing, but the prime culprit is the CME Group.

Ironically, it is data from the CME and published by the CFTC that prove price manipulation on the COMEX.

Vitiligo is a chronic skin disease that causes de pigmentation of skin. By keeping fresh water in a copper utensil,
such as a copper flask or even copper plated cookware, the water becomes infused with copper ions.

Herbal or natural treatments like turmeric
and babchi seeds may be used.

Howdy just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your post seem
to be running off the screen in Safari. I’m not sure if this is a
format issue or something to do with web browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know.
The design look great though! Hope you get the issue fixed soon.
Kudos

Hi there! This post couldn’t be written any better! Looking through
this article reminds me of my previous roommate!
He continually krpt talking about this. I’ll forward thios
artile to him. Fairly cdrtain he’ll have a great read. Many thanks for sharing!

The Grape Girl: Looking to discover a new wine of
choice. Dine in and take out service are offered at these
restaurants and some even provide food delivery.
Red Lobster first opened in 1968 in Lakeland, Florida and was the
first seafood restaurant to gain nationwide prominence with 700
locations.

So unlocking it would give you considerable advantage over
a phone that you are using under contract with some carrier.
Analysts and pundits were off the mark with that prediction, as instead Apple chose to release the i – Phone 5C as a replacement for the i
– Phone 5, which in the past the company would have continued to sell at a $99 price point on contract.
On Friday, when the i – Phone 5 was released, it was discovered that Verizon i
– Phones were SIM-unlocked.

Excellent beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend
your web site, how can i subscribe for a blog website? The
account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this
your broadcast provided bright clear idea

Meditation and visualization techniques take on many different forms.
It’s not necessarily typical process to connect economics together with real racing 3 triche.
That said, learning to drive is easier said than done.

Howdy! I could have sworn I’ve been too this blog before but after checking
through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely happy I found
it and I’ll be book-marking andd checking back frequently!

We shall examine the JTB-Guide-Dog model, a lovely
model. The adventure will be released in the market to ensure most of the
needs of action people are met. Though a bit expensive,
it is however a good investment.

Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to
assert tat I acquire in fact enjoyed account your blog posts.
Any way I’ll be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access
consistently quickly.

In any case, an effective showcasing fight
fundamentally requests catching the consideration of the spectator, in addition to keeping your site overhauled at all times.
Although security is always a challenge in small business,
you have many options for keeping employee-owned electrodomesticos devices protected.
Put in your password, where it asks for a secure server
ask your ISP for support.

” Facebook will not store your password, so you don’t have to worry that Facebook will go through your emails. But if you must utilize the service (wink) be sure you beef up your security by employing hard to guess account details. However if you really are a Government employee or an employee who works with children under age 13, the Act enables States legislating in this region to provide an exemption, whilst another exception permits the executive branch to exempt entire classes of workers if they touch classified information, including soldiers.

To the untrained eye, these lesions can look a little like acne.
I will not be held responsible for any corruption of programs due to the editing
of the registry. Listeners send in their Christmas wish letters,
and the station elicits the help of sponsors to grant a select few.

Hi there, i read your blog from time to time and i own a sumilar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot off spam remarks?
If so how do you prevent it, anny plhgin or anything
you can suggest? I geet so much lately it’s driving me insane so any support iss very much appreciated.

Always keep in mind when trying new hair treatments that what
is right for someone else may not achieve the same
results for you. Coconut oil has amazing properties for fighting both internal and external yeast infections.
Lately, the coconut oil has been given much attention not only for its use in cooking but also for its
value as a hair and skin care product.

you’re in point of fact a just right webmaster. The web site loading speed is incredible. It kind of feels that you’re doing any distinctive trick. In addition, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve performed a great activity on this topic!

Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the images aren’t loading properly.
I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it
in two different web browsers and both show the same outcome.

Common places business citations can be found on are Yelp, Yahoo. This value or indicator is quickly calculated with the use of multiple factors taken into consideration. I don’t care what other ‘experts’ say; good copywriting is and always will be:.

Thank you a lot for sharing this with all people you really understand what you’re speaking about! Bookmarked. Please also seek advice from my website =). We will have a link alternate arrangement between us

Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Thank you, However I am going
through difficulties with your RSS. I don’t understand the
reason why I can’t join it. Is there anybody having the same RSS problems?
Anybody who knows the answer will you kindly respond? Thanx!!

So if you update a post frequently, some of these services may blacklist your site, this handy plugin stops
Word – Press from pinging these services when you edit a
post, but allows it to ping them when you first add the post,
removing the possibility of being blacklisted as a spammer on those services.
You can also visit your blog’s home page by typing your
domain name in the browser address bar, and then click Site Admin to access your Word – Press login screen. Blogging
is becoming extremely popular now days where people make blogs to talk
about different topics, such as politics, word peace, technology, economics, social causes, entertainment, travels, dating and so on as well as celebrities create blogs which enable them to come in direct contact with their fans and
almost each and every thing taking place in the planet
around you is blogged about.

I’m amazed, I have to admit. Seldom do I encounter a
blog that’s both educative and interesting, and let me tell you, you’ve
hit the nail on the head. The problem is something which
too few people are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy that I stumbled across this in my search for something regarding this.

gucci bags
Good day! I could have sworn I’ve visited your blog before but after looking at some of the posts I
realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m definitely happy I
stumbled upon it and I’ll be bookmarking it and checking back often!

Thanks on your marvelous posting! I quite enjoyed reading it, you are
a great author.I will make sure to bookmark your blog and
will often come back sometime soon. I want to encourage one to
continue your great writing, have a nice afternoon!

What’s Taking place i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve discovered It absolutely useful and it has helped me out loads.
I’m hoping to contribute & aid different users like its aided me.
Good job.

Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with SEO?
I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good gains.
If you know of any please share. Kudos!

As we all know islands are those areas which are surrounded by water,
Cyprus is an island too. Use a cheap hosting plan for your
website during the development stages. Website leasing and rental companies may also offer Search engine optimization services as part of
the leasing or rental package.

I think that everything wrote was very logical.
However, what about this? suppose you added a little content?
I mean, I don’t want to tell you how to run your website, however what if you added a post title that makes people want more?
I mean Deep Captujre Files Major Lawsuit Against the SEC | Deep Capture is kinda boring.
You might glance at Yahoo’s front page and see how they create news headlines to
get viewers to open the links. You might add a video or a related
pic or two to grab readers excited about what you’ve
got too say. In my opinion, it might make your posts a little livelier.

VPN enables you to search on the internet anonymously, websites as
bad this, Netflix cannot tell where you stand physically located.
I am sitting within earlier morning watching many birds fly in and out with the cattails and willows.

Fear flags are for telling your heroes to prevent
areas from the map. We noticed off how the 364-acre park attracts literally every age group,
using the roller coasters and thrill rides for that teens and ‘tweens, and Kidzville and
Nickelodeon Central for your little guys. With the vpn server confidential information cannot be hijacked along the way.

It certainly can become a bit overwhelming sometimes, particularly
if that moment comes when the enemy features a tank,
plus you’ve got absolutely no way to defend it. The one I most clearly remember would be a picture of a Ferris wheel
and fair. Who knows, maybe by Company of Heroes 3 gamers can get to find out the tale in the North African campaign or perhaps the War within the Pacific.
by utilising the world’s most beneficial research
tool: The Internet. At the finish from the day, we only phoned for pickup
plus a van was with the park gate inside of a short while to look at us back towards the hotel.
With the help of the virtual private network (VPN), and Internet user has the capacity to temporarily
change their IP address, and for that reason trick sites
like Channel 4 into thinking you are in The UK. *Now this is information that I myself have
gathered doing my very own research. Should you choose the booklet event program, you is going
to be given an alternative for the covers as well as the binding.
SFC Manfred Baier, senior medic, was dispatched
immediately to Ban Me Thuot to try to re-establish a relationship while using Montagnards that they
started inside a previous tour in 1962 ‘. It’s 35 million which 5
million are French speakers, and that means you can’t do much with this height and width of market.
According to IGN PC, you will find there’s huge article on Company of Heroes
2 from PC Gamer UK, that are already leaked.
In this Majesty 2 strategy guide we’ll take a look on the core mechanics and give top
tips to help you on your own way. Make sure though you don’t misspell any
name and designation. If you are planning to sell wholesale electronics then you definitely should have a look at Electronix – HQ they
can be a US based distributor of name brand cameras and more.
I don’t know just what state-the state of hawaii can alter every once
in awhile, can’t it. In fact, should they were to point inward,
they’d see which they’ve neglected their to exaggerate upwardly.
When you buy your Kindle from Amazon or another electronic company that sells e – Readers, you may well be asked if you’d like a lengthy warranty.
s anniversary or even a wedding for a couple it might be nice to include a shorter story on what the company started (like small beginnings) or even the love story of an couple who continues to be through a great deal and
is finally tying the knot. Probably one with the most terrifying parts in the entire film happens when a little daughter girl who may have gotten “bitten” with
a zombie, turns into a zombie in the basement of the farmhouse.
and infinite generosity of human spirit, they would
be the true heroes of.

It is a method contest where the players utilizes their methods to coordinate with others and assault each other.
In the biggest part of Africa, marriage is more of a union between two family’s or lineages than what it is between the actual husband and wife.
Cattle rustling, skirmishes with British troops and highland clans, dislocated shoulders, musket ball wounds,
and races across the countryside all combine to make Claire realize that she’s really not fallen into a movie set, these men are deadly serious.

My spouse and I absolutely love your blog and find the majority of your
post’s to be precisely what I’m looking for. Do you offer guest
writers to write content for you? I wouldn’t mind
producing a post or elaborating on a number of the subjects you write related to here.
Again, awesome website!

As a matter of fact, every roof needs to be inspected and maintained.
It just makes sense tto take tthe time tto expllore your options and to be sure that you’re working with skmeone who will follow tgrough the process.
Although a handymman may try tto talk you into using his services for less money, the better
choice is to go with a recognized roofing contractor, one thyat belongs to at least one professsional association.

Simply want to say your article is as astonishing.
The clarity in your post is just spectacular and i can assume you’re an expert on this subject.
Fine with your permission let me to grab your feed to keep updated with forthcoming post.

Howdy! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you
using for this website? I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve had problems with hackers
and I’m looking at alternatives for another platform.

I would be fantastic if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Many thanks, However I am
having problems with your RSS. I don’t know why I can’t
join it. Is there anyone else having similar RSS problems?
Anybody who knows the answer will you kindly
respond? Thanks!!

The Zcode was really developed based on scientific findings and is also a accurate
investments bot. We totally underestimated what lengths the solder would go.
On April 29, 2010 Poptropica Mythology Island game has become
released.

Then, the person can categorize, organize, send, and share these beautiful photographs although some can touch upon the pictures that their friends have posted.
Like Twitter and Facebook, you are able to become friends of actual real-life friends or of various people you know solely on-line.
You can follow celebrities, artists, and those
that take beautiful photographs that you will enjoy and you can also
contribute your own quirky vision you will ever have. There are so many
beautiful options with Instagram that may really you could make your
photographs look marvelous and will also be thrilled
in order to sell them.

Yesterday, while I was at work, my cousin stole my apple ipad and tested to see if it can survive a 40
foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My iPad is now
destroyed and she has 83 views. I know this is totally off
topic but I had to share it with someone!

Hey there are using WordPress for your site platform? I’m new to
the blog world but I’m trying to get started and create my own.
Do you require any coding knowledge to make your own blog?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks for your marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you may be a
great author.I will make sure to bookmark your blog and definitely
will come back at some point. I want to encourage you to ultimately continue your great
job, have a nice morning!

Magnificent beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend
your website, how can i subscribe for a weblog web site? The account helped me a appropriate
deal. I were a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided vivid
clear idea

First off I would like to say fantastic blog! I had a quick question which I’d like to ask if you do not mind. I was interested to know how you center yourself and clear your thoughts before writing. I have had a hard time clearing my thoughts in getting my thoughts out there. I do take pleasure in writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are usually wasted simply just trying to figure out how to begin. Any ideas or tips? Many thanks!

Thank you, I have recently been searching for info about this subject for a long time and yours is the greatest I’ve discovered till now. However, what concerning the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?

You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this
matter to be really something that I think I would never understand.
It seems too complicated and very broad for me. I’m looking forward
for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!

Considering how serious breast on men the condition is caused by other factors.
Gynecomastia has become a major problem among males in our current society.

Since body fat stores oestrogen and also converts testosterone into
oestrogen, this is a normal situation that happens during puberty.
If someone in your family dealt with enlarged breasts,
it is not recommended for all patients. If the
gynecomastia is a highly-treatable condition.

To select the right service, users should to be clear about the kind of partner they
are looking for. and you need to be ready to pull up a number of men and women who are also foot fetishists.
In many states there are different BDSM groups who offer trainings and workshops.

I think everything said made a great deal of sense.
But, what about this? what if you asded a little content?
I am not saying your information isn’t good, but suppose you added a post title that grabbed
people’s attention? I mean Deepp Capture Files Major Lawsuit Against the SEC | Deep Capture is a little plain. You might peek at
Yahoo’s front page and watch how they wrjte poxt titles to grab viewers to click.
You might try addingg a video or a pic or two to grab people
interested about everything’ve written. In my
opinion, it could make your posts a little bit
more interesting.

There is a passionate advocate for positive methods it is important to be
doing the undesirable dog training action is occurring
in utero. Unfortunately, this does not make it feel comfortable
around other people and animals appropriately dog training via continuous training.

I think this is one of the most vital information for me. And i’m glad reading your
article. But wanna remark on few general things, The site style is
great, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers

Each new age brought the criminal element forward with it.
The says of free proxies and tunnelling services are over, and as the Chinese government begins to
tighten its grip on what comes in and out of the country informationally speaking, the need for a vpn to bypass
internet censorship in China grows every day. By ranking your website
on the very first page of search engine results, you are tapping into a huge number of
people looking for what exactly you offer.

Understanding both advantages and disadvantages are important in order to choose the
best internet marketing strategy. In addition, many of the words used started to take on slightly
different meanings, depending on the context in which they are used.
For more information visit: security gives you the protection from all kinds of worms, viruses and other problems.

Hello I am so glad I found your site, I really found you by
error, while I was researching on Google for something else,
Anyways I am here now and would just like to say cheers for a fantastic post and a all round entertaining blog
(I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it
all at the moment but I have bookmarked it and also added
in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to
read much more, Please do keep up the awesome jo.

Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is important and all. But imagine if you added some great pictures or videos to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and video clips, this site could definitely be one of the greatest in its niche. Excellent blog!

I was wondering if you ever considered changing the layout of your blog?
Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so
people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text
for only having 1 or two pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?, http://goo.gl/xIMAhW

Having read this I thought it was very enlightening. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to put this short article together. I once again find myself personally spending way too much time both reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile!

Hi would you mind letting me know which webhost you’re utilizing?
I’ve loaded your blog in 3 different internet browsers and
I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most.
Can you suggest a good web hosting provider at a honest price?
Thank you, I appreciate it!

Hi! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but
after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me.
Nonetheless, I’m definitely delighted I found it and
I’ll be bookmarking and checking back frequently!

hello!,I really like your writing so a lot! share we communicate more about
your post on AOL? I require an expert in this space to resolve
my problem. Maybe that’s you! Taking a look forward to see you.

Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article.
I’ll make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post.
I’ll definitely return.

Howdy! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after checking through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back frequently!

Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed!
Very useful information specifically the last part :
) I care for such information a lot. I was seeking this certain info for a
very long time. Thank you and best of luck.

Great blog right here! Also your web site rather a lot
up very fast! What host are you the usage of? Can I am getting your affiliate hyperlink to
your host? I want my website loaded up as quickly as yours
lol

Anyone who says that Facebook, Twitter, My – Space, etc can be a ‘trend’ that will
soon pass is not steering you in the right direction.
Unless you happen to be investing in advertising yourself, the only way
to generate foot traffic is with attractive content. Use online follow-up
methods including email and be ready to use direct mail.

Quite a different story is connected to the Catalina Casino in California, USA.
The good news is that you and your kids can also enjoy dress up games in the web, without paying a penny.
It has the learning and reasoning attitude in adding
water or seeds, which kids discover. These are popular games to play from work or when trying to really relax.
ESRB ratings are the guidelines adopted by the industry to decide what situations
and concepts are appropriate for people of different age groups.

Please let me know if you’re looking for a author for your blog. You have some really great posts and I think I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really like to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please blast me an email if interested. Cheers!

Hmm it looks like your site ate my first comment (it was super long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing. Do you have any helpful hints for novice blog writers? I’d certainly appreciate it.

Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly comeback.

I rarely drop responses, but i did some searching and wound up here Deep Capture Files Major Lawsuit Against the SEC | Deep Capture.
And I actually do have 2 questions for you if it’s allright.

Could it be only me or does it appear like a few of these comments look like
written by brain dead folks? 😛 And, if you are writing at additional sites,
I’d like to keep up with everything fresh you have to post.
Could you list of every one of all your community pages like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?

Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to say that I
have truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts.
After all I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope
you write again soon!

What happened is shrouded in legalese but the outcome was that Baltimore reached a settlement with the Colts under
which all the lawsuits were dropped and the Colts agreed to support a new team for
Baltimore. Once you’ve completed your prep-training, you
can move onto the second football training tip – more intense strength training to build
muscle mass, strength and power. Soccer is the game where players need enormous stamina and footwork.

how do you resist those strong temptations to eat wrong foods and hurt your health and your light level.
In principle you should always only buy the least processed
rice. Xanthan gum is currently used to international thickening, suspension, emulsion, stable in in one
body.

But they usually beat around the bushes and expect you to do what Arnold does,
a million sets and 5 hours of steady pumping iron. Aikido focuses on realizing synchronization between ‘ki’ (spirit) and ‘tai’
(the body). Vegetables and fruits are excellent sources of vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants.

Chanel Handbags Cheap For Sale
Hello! I’ve been reading your weblog for a while now and finally
got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Kingwood Tx!
Just wanted to say keep up the excellent job!

They must race from line of children to a chair out about 30
feet, go around the chair and back to the line. Nearly every level
in Casey’s Contraptions can be solved in many different ways.
Personal bankruptcy should be a last resort in debt management and
debt consolidation.

Heya! I realize this is kind of off-topic but I needed to ask. Does managing a well-established blog such as yours require a massive amount work? I’m completely new to writing a blog however I do write in my diary everyday. I’d like to start a blog so I can easily share my own experience and views online. Please let me know if you have any recommendations or tips for new aspiring bloggers. Thankyou!

Like Cinderella in the past he chose candy crush saga hack to reside in Iowa.

This game updated regularly with new mobile games will automatically save your progress when you know what that character will
evolve and improve it. Then you type in, and the other hand, development of other types.

It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d certainly donate to this brilliant blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to new updates and will talk about this website with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

Like us, only at Shoppers 24 Reports, you might be a little unsure about the aftereffects of the dietary plan, but you have to test it on your own; the results are real. Several worldclass players have started applying Garcinia Cambogia items as part of their personal training strategy. I actually heard my mother speaking about this diet several days ago because one-of her friends has dropped like 12 pounds in the 15 nights!

Great beat ! I wish to apprentice whilst you amend your
web site, how can i subscribe for a weblog web
site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast
provided shiny transparent idea

Hey there just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different browsers and both show the same outcome.

Treatment by using antiviral medicines works well in lowering and controlling the consequences of the outward symptoms.
Antiviral medication can furthermore decrease the severity of
the signs and its duration.

What i do not realize is in truth how you are not really a lot more smartly-liked than you might be now. You’re very intelligent. You know therefore significantly in relation to this matter, produced me individually imagine it from so many numerous angles. Its like men and women aren’t fascinated unless it’s one thing to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your individual stuffs great. All the time handle it up!

When you are buying replacement wheels, choose those with a rubber material.

What I have learned is that cost is not always an indicator of performance.

This seems couterintuitive at very first, but you
want to have the heaviest things at the major
of the backpack so that the fat is distributed evenly straight down your back and onto your hips, rather
than pulling on your spine.

Great beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend your website, how
could i subscribe for a blog web site? The account helped me a acceptable deal.
I had been a little bit acquainted of this your
broadcast offered bright clear concept

The sequencer has buttons, for help, tutorial videos, transport controls,
bar count, BPM, 16 tracks, drum pads and the keyboard along the
bottom. It is imperative to know the features of the phone, and
match the features to your needs. Another important device for your retail store could probably be Honeywell barcode scanners.
The Samsung makes beautiful sliding mobile phones, which is known by all
creatures on this planet.

Do you have a spam issue on this site; I also am a blogger,
and I was curious about your situation; many of us have
developed some nice practices and we are looking to exchange
methods with other folks, why not shoot me an e-mail if interested.

Hi, I’m Velda but my spouse doesn’t like it at everyone.
The thing he adores most might be to camp but he hasn’t made funds with
in which. My house is actually in Florida. Credit authorising is
my normal work now but I’ve already applied for reasonably priced is the.

The only and the main downside of Xilisoft is its higher price.
Select the output format as you wish, like DVD to MP4, DVD to i – Tunes, DVD to MOV, DVD to MPEG, etc.

Jim Taylor has been a fixture in comics for over 30 years,
primarily as a cover artist’but has also done some wonderful interiors for projects like The Wraith, Lovely as Lie, Ripperman, and various independent publishers.

This phone is additionally compatible with two types of Bluetooth headsets of
that one is shaped like a wrist watch along with the other in a slim bar form.

The arrangement from the gear train will depend on the amount
of torque being transmitted, the orientation of the input and the output shafts, and the size of the gear box.
But designer watches might require replacement elliptical, square, or
perhaps oval glass faces which aren’t easy to make or find.
You may also locate some terrific buys from private parties online,
but be ware. Portable and Multifunctional Watch Design Wrist Power Charger Battery.

Sometimes, we all can not take some time on the internet makes some parts online games of the offline games
such as casting spells or killing monsters. It seems like everything you can buy
at your brain to get into a USB stage, if one already understands the
real life settings. Well the text adventure games in local
network. They don’t even need to be run.

However, it lacked the consumer base that Xbox had, and Xbox may be steadily improving its XBox Live member knowledge about each upgrade.
No, an Xbox 360 wireless headset is really a must-have
accessory that’s really not an accessory in any respect, if you think about it.
Select yes and hopefully you may be knee deep in elves again before you know it.

A number of them purely desire to upgrade to your 360 using their standard Xbox,
while other people are beginning their gaming exposure to the Xbox 360.
If you’ve got the Xbox 3 Red Lights, you just aren’t unlucky.
It may be possible that your particular Xbox may become so hot what has interior components start to melt
that may ruin it completely so be careful. You must figure out how to resolve this problem straight away before
it’s too late. If you would like a game title console that may help you stay entertained, this post is definitely
the correct one for you. For one of the most part oahu is the distraction of great importance and better
competition than existed in the early days of the
Playstation line. s warranty continues to be good, then you can contain the store that you purchased it repair the
console without any charge, if you. Currently XBox has added Microsoft Kinect, the
opportunity to make yourself the controller, to its arsenal and now
we can anticipate it to be around for use with all the new system as well.

Additionally this console offers lower consuption of your energy whilst
running just like fast due for the improved micro chips.
Think of how much money you’ll save when you’re able to copy Xbox
360 games, protect your collection of the favourite games,
and steer clear of ever having to spend a high income to change a damaged or lost game.

But again, the 360 was extremely influenced by web link pace forever quality so it wasn’t someplace to provide legitimate
substantial dvd high quality for the reason that in the large document dimension it commonly arrives in. In fact, as of Jan 09 2012 over 66 million consoles are actually sold worldwide.

This became so well-liked that all game around the Xbox 360 must include achievements as a mandatory requirement.
It will be the power supply that is the cause from
the problem. Golf Game titles and Grand Theft Auto may be the only
1 inside the world that can recognize the golf swing.
The player moves the controller along with the console picks up on the movement and
recreates it on screen. You also can remodel your games into advanced levels
and characters etc. The overheating caused from folks and
components of the Xbox 360 might cause solder joints to get apart or perhaps generally fail.
The XNA Community not far off can also be intriguing and this
will allow one to download any of the games with this site.
The Sony Play – Station Two is Sony’s second dvd console,
the successor for the original Sony Play – Station, as
well as the predecessor for the Sony Play – Station Three.
One with the worst moments in a very gamer’s existence is
the realisation of experiencing a broken Xbox 360. “
Getting back to its roots, the new update integrates the Metro Design language supported through Windows Phone 7 to bring continuity to multiple screens.

At the end of the crop, excessive rain will induce a retting and rotting phase which can affect yields considerably.
As the industry evolves and more growers share their experiences, LED indoor grow lights are becoming the device of choice that more plus much more
growers are turning to. Reserva Privada really are a combination of West Coast Cannabis breeders who before formation of Reserva
Privada had no approach to show and promote their individual cannabis strains.

Nice post. I learn something new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It will always be interesting to read content from other authors and use a little something from other web sites.

Hi, i read your blog from time to time and i owwn a similar one and
i was just curious if you get a lot of spam remarks? If so how do you reduce it, any
plugin or anything you can advise? I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so anny support is very much appreciated.

Most of the comments here are just complete nonsense and unrelated crap. For fk sake get some sort of captcha or something here.

Anyway, great that this suit was filed, I’m watching a company right now that potentially could change the lives of millions, and it is getting short volume 40-50% of total volume every freaking day and attacked relentlessly on Seeking Alpha and similar sites by hack articles with complete fabrications. It makes me sick to watch something with so much potential to change lives be destroyed by a few greedy motherfkers who deserve no less than life in prison. I hate these people with every fiber of my being. They are on the same level as ISIS. The company I speak of is ACTC.

It would be very disappointing to spend hours writing your press release only to discover that nobody cares about what you have written because no one is aware of its existence. The editor of Tomatoes Monthly doesn’t care about your press release announcing the launch of your classic car detailing service in a small town in Vermont. Not simply will the great sites be more useful with regard to link juice; they’re also more prone to be incorporated into Google News and syndicated elsewhere, giving invaluable exposure on top of the search engine results. If a journalist can not contact you within a reasonable time frame of sending a press request, your news will not be covered and the purpose of the press release will be defeated. [xi] Amnesty International, “Report”, 2003 , June 26, 2004 [xii] Newberg, Paula.

My name is Lawrence, I am from U.K. I want to share my testimonies to the general public on how this great man called Dr Osas cure my sister from Genetic Herpes with the herbal medication gotten from dr. osas, he cures other diseases too herbal is a great medication. To hell with the government and their insane policy, he have a medication that is hundred percent assured to cure genital herpes and you don’t need to spend so much money on anymore . I want you to contact dr Osas on: doctorosasherbalhome@gmail.com My family is now a brand new one, so stop your worries and go get your medication and set the family free of the deadly disease that hold no respect to family harmony. Thank you for reading my comment.

She had adopted a perfect planning from then and went as per that without feeling anything difficult. Any breaking news in India is available at a touch these days. They are not in order of importance but just as they come to my old gray head.

Hi there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog. Is it very hard to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast. I’m thinking about setting up my own but I’m not sure where to begin. Do you have any ideas or suggestions? Thank you

The players in the wolves of wall street host plenty of despicable men, who’re entertainig us
like we’re a part in a comedy show. If you are
one of the 93 million people who log in daily to play the massively
popular mobile game Candy Crush, chances are that at some point you
have hit a wall, been stuck on a level for a few days, and have considered throwing your
phone out the window in frustration. In the filing, King Digital Entertainment disclosed significant growth since rolling out
in 2012.

Unquestionably believe that which you stated.
Your favorite justification appeared to be oon the web
the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people think about
worries that they just don’t know about. You managed to hit the naail upon the top as well
as defined outt the whole thing without having side effect ,
people could take a signal. Will likely be back
to get more. Thanks

When the hydrogen peroxide reacts along with certain proteins, the hydrogen peroxide splits into oxygen and then water. Salon products are better for the hair, so in the case of longer hairstyles that’s what you need to buy. When you visit your dentist he will measure the size of your mouth, analyze your tooth patterns, and inspect the contours of your jaw and gums.

On a watch’s dial you can find six alarm confirmation dots.
There were several proof your bloomery strategies are
also employed in China Based Online Shop, just Cina received turbo charge heaters
purchase this halloween steel in 500 BCE. Everyone needs a close look with alarm and
that’s why this watch will come in different designs and finish.

You could also locate some terrific buys from private parties online, but be ware.

They will also be very an easy task to carry around; you simply wear it
as you do a normal watch without arousing suspicion.

I’m impressed, I must say. Rarely do I come across
a blog that’s both equally educative and engaging, and let me tell you,
you have hit the nail on the head. The issue is something that
not enough folks are speaking intelligently about. Now i’m very happy I found this in my hunt for
something relating to this.

I was curious if you ever thought of changing the structure of your website?
Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.
Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two pictures.
Maybe you could space it out better?

I like the valuable information you supply to your articles. I’ll bookmark your weblog and test again here regularly. I’m quite certain I’ll learn many new stuff proper right here! Best of luck for the following!

Hey there I am so excited I found your site, I really found you by mistake,
while I was looking on Yahoo for something else, Nonetheless I am here now and would just like to say kudos for a
incredible post and a all round exciting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at
the minute but I have bookmarked it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal more,
Please do keep up the excellent work., funny videos epic fails
compilation 2014 http://goo.gl/yNCZGq

Hello there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels. I’ll appreciate if you continue this in future. Numerous people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely comeback.

You are so interesting! I do not believe I have read through anything like this before. So good to discover another person with a few unique thoughts on this topic. Seriously.. thank you for starting this up. This site is one thing that is needed on the internet, someone with a little originality!

Has any attorney or concerned shareholder of CMKM Diamonds (CMKX) contacted you to join your lawsuit against the SEC? I personally am a CMKM shareholder, waiting for around 13 years now for news of what happened to the money in a Trust gathered from brokers by Mr. Bob Maheu around 2002-2004. The rumor is we were supposed to be paid that money in 2005, but we were not compensated. CMKM is supposed to be the LARGEST naked shorted stock in the entire history of the stock market, yet the shareholders of the now ‘private’ stock have never seen a return on investment. I know that Mr. Bryne had an animation running on CMKX original website describing the way naked shorting worked, but it has been long taken down. It was entertaining and informative, and obviously Mr. Byrne knew or knows some of the people involved in our efforts to recieve compensation. We were involved in a larger movement to expose these criminal efforts to gain monies from shareholders and company owners in a very lucrative and dishonest effort by short sellers attacking small companies with terrific assets, to bankrupt these companies, gain access to those assets, and all the while never paying taxes on their transactions and using the ‘short money’ for nefarious purposes around the world. I am not involved in proving these allegations, I am merely a shareholder. It’s all rumor, except for the documented paperwork and/or conversations shareholders have had with CMKM attorneys over the years. So, one of my questions to you would be, will your efforts expose a naked short in CMKM Diamonds? Would you allow and would their be a cost to JOIN your lawsuit against the SEC for FOI documents? I know Mr Byrne has won at least one lawsuit against brokers that shorted Overstock. It has been well documented. CMKM waters are very murky so what is your opinion of an effort to include us in your requests if possible? Thank you for your time and thank you for your efforts to expose this illegal activity through the Deep Capture website. Sincerely, Larry johnston.

KEEP UP THE GOOD FIGHT BUT ONE BIT OF ADVICE IS YOU MAY BE IN THE WRONG COURT RE FOIA _ THE FOLLOWING IS AN EXCERPT FROM http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/karmacts.htm your FOIA requests will be met with silence, whereupon you will file a FOIA appeal. Once the appeal deadline has run, you are in court.

But which court? Guess …

… the answer is the District Court of the United States. What an amazing discovery, yes? A United States District Judge in Arizona, in late Spring of 1996, ruled that the United States District Court (“USDC”) is not the proper forum to litigate a request under the FOIA. That can only be because FOIA requests must be litigated in the District Court of the United States (“DCUS”).

The compounding of these pimple treatment ingredients
has the capability to minimize oil generated by the skin. If you choose to
use acne home-made treatments you’ll be taking the first step towards being in charge of your diet.
Natural remedies do not create any side effects or
rashes, which might aggravate your skin condition.

Hello this is somewhat of off topic but I was wanting to know if blogs
use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code
with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding skills so I wanted to get guidance from someone
with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!

Wonderful goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just extremely great.
I actually like what you’ve acquired here, certainly like
what you’re saying and the way in which you say it.
You make it entertaining and you still take
care of to keep it wise. I can not wait to read much more from you.
This is actually a wonderful website.

Great goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff
previous to and you’re just too fantastic. I really like what
you have acquired here, really like what you are saying and the way in which you say it.
You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it sensible.
I cant wait to read much more from you. This is really a terrific
website.

Ӎagnificent goods frоm you, man. I’ve understand your stuff
previous to and you are just еxtremely excelⅼent. I
actually liқe what you’ve acquired here, really like what yoᥙ are saying and the
way іn which you say іt. Yօu make it entertaining and you
still care for to keep it smart. I cant wait to rеаd much more from you.
This is really a terгific site.

With havin so much written content do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright infringement?
My website has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either written myself or outsourced but it seems a lot of
it is popping it up all over the web without my authorization. Do you know any ways
to help reduce content from being ripped off?
I’d truly appreciate it.

Excellent website you have here but I was curious if
you knew of any forums that cover the same topics talked about here?
I’d really like to be a part of community where I can get comments from other experienced people that share the same interest.
If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Appreciate it!

Hey there I am so happy I found your blog, I really found
you by accident, while I was researching on Askjeeve for something else, Regardless I am here now and
would just like to say kudos for a marvelous post and a
all round enjoyable blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to
look over it all at the minute but I have saved it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal more, Please do keep up the excellent work.

What i do not understood is in truth how you are now not actually much
more smartly-preferred than you may be now. You’re so intelligent.
You realize therefore considerably when it comes to this topic, made
me in my view believe it from a lot of varied angles. Its like women and men don’t seem to be
fascinated except it’s one thing to accomplish with Lady gaga!

This Big Fat Lotteries teams all vary in size and will depend on the lotto game played, you will also
find along with the introduction of a Superenalotto syndicate competitors of 100 members.

I like to drive to Epcot and Disney’s Hollywood Studios, but I find it is
more convenient to travel by bus to the Magic Kingdom and Disney’s
Animal Kingdom. This array is approximately 10 feet above ground at the lowest point.

Unquestionably believe that that you said.
Your favorite reason seemed to be on the web the easiest thing to
understand of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed at the same
time as folks think about worries that they just
do not understand about. You managed to hit the nail upon the highest and also defined out the whole thing with no need side effect ,
other folks can take a signal. Will probably be
again to get more. Thank you

You’re so cool! I do not believe I’ve read anything like this before.
So good to discover somebody with some genuine thoughts
on this subject matter. Really.. thanks for starting this
up. This website is something that is needed on the web, someone with a bit of originality!

I’m not sure the place you’re getting your info, however great topic.
I must spend a while finding out more or working out more.
Thanks for great information I used to be in search of this information for my mission.

“(To date) we have saved about 300,000 k – Wh,” said, Dr.
I like to drive to Epcot and Disney’s Hollywood Studios, but I find it is more convenient to travel by bus to the
Magic Kingdom and Disney’s Animal Kingdom. When you
call Disney directly, the phone reps are not permitted to volunteer the
fact that a discount may be available.

An outstanding share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a friend who has been conducting a little research on this.

And he in fact bought me lunch simply because I discovered
it for him… lol. So let me reword this….
Thanks for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending
some time to talk about this matter here on your site.

That is very fascinating, You’re an overly profewssional blogger.
I have joined your rss feed and lkok ahead to in search of extra of your edcellent post.
Also, I’ve shared your website in my social networks

I loved as much as you will receive carried out right
here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored subject matter stylish.

nonetheless, you command get got an edginess over that you wish be delivering the following.
unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as
exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.

I would like to thank you for the efforts you have put
in writing this site. I am hoping to view the same high-grade content from you later on as well.
In truth, your creative writing abilities has inspired
me to get my very own website now 😉

Hey excellent blog! Does running a blog similar to this take a great deal of work?

I’ve no expertise in coding but I had been hoping to start my
own blog soon. Anyway, should you have any ideas or techniques for
new blog owners please share. I know this is off subject however I just needed to ask.