1.Jennings Blames U.S. for Leaving Deadly Germs "Unguarded"
Blame America not the culprits, example 1: Peter Jennings opened Thursday's World News Tonight by citing "the deadly germs gone missing. The laboratory in Baghdad that the U.S. left unguarded." Brian Ross relayed how "lab scientists are angry at the U.S. for failing to protect the facility" and warned that Marines arrived "only after Iraqi scientists reported the dangerous materials -- including black fever, cholera, AIDS, and polio -- had been removed by looters, a serious public health concern." But on CNN, Christiane Amanpour pointed out that the inaccuracy of the diseases wrongly listed by a misinformed chemist: "The lab's biologist came out to correct her, saying they don't have AIDS or cholera or black fever."

2. CNN: Museum "Plundered Under the Very Noses of U.S. Troops"
Blame America not the culprits, example 2. Peter Jennings cited "the failure of U.S. forces to prevent the pillage of Iraq's national museum" as he set up an entire story examining "the variety of places the U.S. has not been protecting." CNN's Aaron Brown maintained, "There has been intense focus on one question: Did the United States do enough to prevent the theft?" Jim Bitterman mockingly recalled how "one of the most treasured collections of antiquities had been plundered under the very noses of U.S. troops." Bitterman relayed how "critics" charge that the U.S. priority was "protecting hundreds of oil wells scattered across Iraq and the Oil Ministry building in Baghdad, ahead of protecting the Baghdad Museum and other cultural sites."

3.Fidel Castro's Fresh Round of Repression: Bush Drove Him to It
Blame America not the culprit, example 3: "Rising Dissent, U.S. Pressure Led to Cuba Repression," announced the headline over a Reuters story, as if Castro had nothing to do with it. In Time, after noting how 78 dissidents were sentenced "to as much as 27 years in prison" and three "summarily executed," Tim Padgett asked: "What set off Castro's fury?" His answer: George W. Bush. Padgett contended: "Those close to his inner circle say he feels insulted by the U.S." for not rewarding him for softening "his anti-Yanqui vitriol" and letting Jimmy Carter "visit and speak out for democratic change." In spite of that, "the Bush administration has delayed Congress' anti-embargo legislation indefinitely."

Blame America not the culprits, example 1: Germ release at a Baghdad health center. Peter Jennings opened Thursday's World News Tonight by citing "the deadly germs gone missing" and blaming the U.S. military for it: "The laboratory in Baghdad that the U.S. left unguarded."

ABC reporter Brian Ross in Baghdad relayed how "lab scientists are angry at the U.S. for failing to protect the facility" and
complained that "the U.S. Marines on guard today at the Ministry of Health's central public health laboratory were sent in only after Iraqi scientists reported the dangerous materials -- including black fever, cholera, AIDS, and polio -- had been removed by looters, a serious public health concern." But on CNN a couple of hours earlier, Christiane Amanpour pointed out that the ominous list of diseases were incorrectly listed by a misinformed chemist and "the lab's biologist came out to correct her, saying they don't have AIDS or cholera or black fever," though they did have hepatitis and polio."

After his opening tease, Jennings began the April 17 World News Tonight by stressing an ominous example of "the lack of security" in Baghdad:
"Good evening, everyone. We're going to begin this evening with another example of why so many people complain about a lack of security in Baghdad. ABC's Brian Ross reported last night on a trove of intelligence documents about the regime of Saddam Hussein which were simply waiting for a reporter to pick up. Tonight it is about the lack of security at the central public health laboratory which U.S. intelligence has believed for some time might contain information about biological weapons. Today ABC's Brian Ross discovered that it, too, has been looted. And as we understand from you today, Brian, this lab was left unguarded."

Ross confirmed, as taken down by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth: "That's right, Peter. In fact, the lab was left unguarded despite the fact it had been under close scrutiny by UN weapons inspectors. The U.S. Marines on guard today at the Ministry of Health's central public health laboratory were sent in only after Iraqi scientists reported the dangerous materials -- including black fever, cholera, AIDS, and polio -- had been removed by looters, a serious public health concern."
Rasa al-Alaq, chemist, Iraqi Central Public Health Lab, Ross translating: "The viruses that are lost, we have no idea where they went."
Ross: "Lab scientists are angry at the U.S. for failing to protect the facility."
Mounier Kuba, Iraqi Central Public Health Lab Director: "Americans shouldn't protect only Ministry of Oil. They should have protected all the general public health services."
Ross: "The lab was inspected by the UN as recently as last December. No biological weapons were found here, but the U.S. has been suspicious that the Ministry of Health and places like this were involved in an Iraqi bio-weapons program. Former U.S. diplomat Peter Galbraith is an ABC News consultant."
Peter Galbraith, former U.S. diplomat, on scene with Ross: "A building like this should have been known to U.S. intelligence, and it should have been a high priority target to come and secure this building."
Ross: "The Marines said they had seen the looting taking place last Friday but had no instructions to protect the building, and not enough men even if they had wanted to."
Lieutenant Matthew Danner, U.S. Marines: "I didn't know what this facility was. I probably should have done something, but I didn't have the manpower."
Ross: "The Marines have been told to consider the inside of the building dangerous."
Danner: "Since I was not ordered to go in, I'm not going to go in. I can secure it without going in."
Ross: "So you don't want your men to go inside."
Danner: "No, sir, I don't. I would recommend you not go in, either."
Ross concluded over video of a rabbit in the grass: "As escaped laboratory animals roamed free around the compound, a new sign was put up outside, reading, 'Stay away. Extremely dangerous. The lab is polluted with germs.' And tonight the fact is the U.S. does not know what was in there to start, how much got out, or where it is now."

Ross doesn't know either, judging by how another reporter on scene contradicted his list of diseases. At about 4:30pm EDT on Thursday, CNN carried a piece by Christiane Amanpour on the looting of the same facility: "At Iraq's central public health lab, urgent hand-scrawled warnings on the gate: 'pollution,' 'biohazard,' 'danger.' In the courtyard, vials, syringes and papers strewn around by looters."

Amanpour noted: "At first, Dr. Rasa Alaq gave alarming warnings of looted viruses, like AIDS, cholera, black fever, polio and hepatitis, she said. But Alaq is a chemist. And, later, the lab's biologist came out to correct her, saying they don't have AIDS or cholera or black fever, but they were concerned about the following."
Dr. Kameledeen Mohammad, biologist: "Polio virus, hepatitis A virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis D virus. All of these viruses could spread in our population. And what we're doing for many years, for maybe 40 years, will go to be zero."
Amanpour: "The lab was looted last week. And the director has been calling for U.S. military protection, which finally turned up today, and along with it a special task force."
Lt. Col. Charles Allison, U.s. Army: "We're here to find signs of weapons of mass destruction."
Amanpour: "Colonel Allison and his team donned gloves and protective boots. They did a survey. Their conclusion?"
Allison: "This is a facility very similar to our Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta. They do all of the analysis of blood work and diseases of people around Iraq. They bring it here to test it."
Amanpour stressed how the U.S. has come up empty in the search for weapons of mass destruction: "Indeed, over the years, this facility had been surveyed by UN weapons inspectors. This task force pulled out, saying it hadn't found anything that you wouldn't find in any public health and research lab anywhere in the world. There are four of these special scout teams scouring Iraq for weapons of mass destruction. This one has inspected 15 sites. And so far, it says, it's found no smoking gun, no evidence of chemical, nuclear or biological weapons capability. Just last week, they were called in to examine what the U.S. Army had told reporters might be eleven mobile chemical and biological weapons labs in the town of Karbala. On closer inspection, that proved not to be the case..."

Blame America not the culprits, example 2: Looting of Iraq's Baghdad Museum. "Two of the Bush administration's cultural advisors in Iraq have now resigned," Peter Jennings intoned on Thursday's World News Tonight. "They were frustrated by the failure of U.S. forces to prevent the pillage of Iraq's national museum," Jennings relayed in setting up an entire story examining "the variety of places the U.S. has not been protecting."

Over on CNN's NewsNight, Aaron Brown raised "one of the greatest cultural disasters in recent Middle Eastern history: the looting of priceless Iraqi artifacts dating back thousands of years" and contended, "There has been intense focus on one question: Did the United States do enough to prevent the theft?"

Jim Bitterman mockingly recalled how "one of the most treasured collections of antiquities had been plundered under the very noses of U.S. troops." Reporting from a UNESCO meeting in Paris, Bitterman obligingly passed along how "some were furious with the United States for not protecting antiquities in Iraq and not preventing the arson and pillage of Baghdad's national library."

Though Bitterman gave one sentence to how "U.S. officials said their priorities were to win the war and minimize the loss of life," he undermined that with a venal suggestion about U.S. interests: "But critics here point out, their priorities also apparently included protecting hundreds of oil wells scattered across Iraq and the Oil Ministry building in Baghdad, ahead of protecting the Baghdad Museum and other cultural sites."

Bitterman failed to note the environmental disaster burning oil wells would have caused, a point environmentalists surely would have denounced the U.S. for allowing to happen, and that making Iraq's oil industry functional is vital to Iraqis getting money to pay for everything, including museums.

Nightline on Thursday night was dedicated to the looting of the museum, who did it and how it was allowed to occur.

Earlier, Jennings set up an April 17 World News Tonight story: "As we've reported, so many places that maybe should have been guarded in Iraq were not. Two of the Bush administration's cultural advisors in Iraq have now resigned. They were frustrated by the failure of U.S. forces to prevent the pillage of Iraq's national museum. It appears that professional thieves may also have been involved in the looting during which priceless treasures were stolen. ABC's Martha Raddatz reports tonight on the variety of places the U.S. has not been protecting."

Raddatz began: "In Baghdad today, U.S. Marines took charge of what's left of a looted bank, hauling away bags of cash for safe keeping. Could the Americans have done more to protect the hospitals that have been ransacked, the museums that have been looted, the ministries where valuable intelligence documents have been trashed? The former director of operations at the Pentagon says the speed of the regime's collapse made it difficult."
Retired Lt. Gen. Gregory Newbold, former Director of Joint Staff Operations: "In hindsight, I think we would have probably put more military police units and more civil reconstruction units into the flow, but it was not predictable at the time we were putting the plan together."
Raddatz: "We know that human rights groups and archeologists warned that looting might occur. And Army Chief of Staff Eric Shinseki said in February that stabilizing Iraq could require several hundred thousand troops. Civilians at the Pentagon said that estimate was too high."
Richard Perle, former Assistant Secretary of Defense: "I think there is a natural period of conflict. There's often chaos following the collapse of a regime. And when it was a regime as brutal and sadistic as this one, it's likely to be worse."
Raddatz: "When the U.S. intervened in Haiti in 1994, planning had been under way for months to police the cities. Ray Kelly was in charge of the program."
Commissioner Raymond Kelly, New York City Police Department: "We did have a structure that was able to move into Haiti fairly quickly after the military entered Haiti. Obviously, that's not the case right now in Iraq."
Raddatz: "The administration is only now getting around to recruiting law enforcement professionals to work with local Iraqi police officers. So far, the State Department has just 26 people training to go into Iraq, and they won't be there anytime soon. The first two, just two, will not arrive until the end of next week. Was this poor planning? Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld says absolutely not, the administration didn't allow the violence to happen, it just happened. Martha Raddatz, ABC News, Washington."

That reference to Rumsfeld's disagreement with the "allowed" term picked up on his retort to Tim Russert. As recounted in the April 14 CyberAlert, when Russert wanted to know "how did we allow" an Iraqi "museum to be looted?", Rumsfeld marveled at Russert's gall: "'How did we allow?' Now, that's really a wonderful, amazing statement."
Details in the April 14,
2003 CyberAlert[1].

CNN anchor Aaron Brown
introduced Bitterman's story on NewsNight: "It's been called one of the greatest cultural disasters in recent Middle Eastern history: the looting of priceless Iraqi artifacts dating back thousands of years. There has been intense focus on one question: Did the United States do enough to prevent the theft? Today, experts from around the globe gathered in Paris to look at another question as well. Is there any way, any way at all, to get back the treasure?"

From Paris, in a piece which also aired a couple of hours earlier at the top of Paula Zahn's 8pm EDT hour, Jim Bitterman asserted over video of a few looters being chased away by a museum worker: "These are the pictures that shocked and angered historians and archaeologists around the world: a curator of the Baghdad Museum discovering that one of the most treasured collections of antiquities had been plundered under the very noses of U.S. troops. The curator and a TV crew even caught some of the looters red-handed. But on their own, they were unable to stop them.
"The Baghdad Museum, located just a few hundred yards from Iraq's Information Ministry, contained a priceless collection of ancient sculptures, tablets and artifacts that chronicle thousands of years of history, dating back to ancient Mesopotamia, the cradle of civilization.
"Just five days after the looting took place, 30 experts from around the world gathered for an emergency one-day session at UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, to demand steps be taken to salvage the situation, including an immediate worldwide ban on trade of Iraqi cultural items and an urgent fact-finding mission to determine what has been lost.
"Some were furious with the United States for not protecting antiquities in Iraq and not preventing the arson and pillage of Baghdad's national library, which held one of the oldest copies of the Quran. An archaeologist from the University of Chicago said that, from January onward, he repeatedly warned U.S. State Department and Pentagon authorities that such looting was a real possibility and had urged them to take measures to safeguard the archaeological treasures."
McGuire Gibson, University of Chicago: "I was dreading it. I wasn't expecting it. I was dreading it. And when I saw it, of course, the first thing is just total -- you're totally devastated. And then I got very, very angry about the whole thing. It should not have happened. It need not have happened."
Bitterman: "Coalition military officers insisted they were surprised by the looting. U.S. officials said their priorities were to win the war and minimize the loss of life. But critics here point out, their priorities also apparently included protecting hundreds of oil wells scattered across Iraq and the Oil Ministry building in Baghdad, ahead of protecting the Baghdad Museum and other cultural sites."

Bitterman concluded with this admonition: "And several of the experts say now that, with the U.S. in charge in Iraq, it has full responsibility for the safekeeping of Iraq's cultural treasures. Any further damage, said one, would be totally inexcusable."

Blame America not the culprits, or in this case the culprit, example 3: Fidel Castro's fresh round of repression in Cuba. "Rising Dissent, U.S. Pressure Led to Cuba Repression," announced the headline over a Reuters story on Wednesday, as if Castro had nothing to do with it.

In this week's Time magazine, after noting how last week 78 dissidents and independent journalists in Cuba were sentenced "to as much as 27 years in prison" and "three men who tried to hijack a ferry to Florida earlier this month were summarily executed," Tim Padgett asked: "What set off Castro's fury?" The answer: George W. Bush. Padgett contended: "Those close to his inner circle say he feels insulted by the U.S." for not rewarding him for softening "his anti-Yanqui vitriol" and allowing "Jimmy Carter to visit and speak out for democratic change." In spite of that, "the Bush administration has delayed Congress' anti-embargo legislation indefinitely."

James Taranto's "Best of the
Web[2]" column highlighted the April 16 Reuters headline over a story by Anthony Boadle in Havana who relayed Cuban paranoia:
"At a demonstration in the heart of the anti-Castro Cuban exile neighborhood in Miami two weeks ago, a banner that said 'Iraq Now, Cuba Later' alarmed officials in Havana. 'With an aggressive right-wing administration in Washington, we had to put some order here,' a Cuban government official told Reuters. He said concern about U.S. intentions in Cuba had not been so high since the 1962 Cuban Missile crisis."

An excerpt from the Reuters dispatch:

Growing internal dissent and concern that the Bush administration could turn its sights on Cuba after Iraq led the Communist government to unleash the worst political repression in decades, officials and experts said on Wednesday.

In less than a month, Cuba arrested 75 opponents of President Fidel Castro's one-party state and jailed them with terms of up to 28 years, dealing a devastating blow to the island's nascent opposition movement.

Last week three men who hijacked a Havana Bay ferry in a failed bid to reach the United States were executed by firing squad.

The executions shocked European governments that have tried for years to coax Cuba toward democratic change with a policy of engagement through trade, investment and aid....

Diplomatic observers said the dissident movement was too small to pose a threat to the Cuban government, and it was the open support the dissidents were getting from Cuba's long-time ideological foe, the United States, that prompted the massive crackdown.

The Bush administration's decision to go to war in Iraq to oust Saddam Hussein contributed to the Cuban resolve to stamp out a budding opposition, experts believe.

"The Cubans saw it as a signal that the United States was determined to throw its weight around and to blow away anyone it doesn't like through the unilateral use of force," said Wayne Smith, a former American diplomat in Havana.

Cuban authorities charged the arrested dissidents with conspiring against their country with U.S. diplomats, calling them a "Fifth Column" and "mercenaries" at the service of a foreign power.

At a demonstration in the heart of the anti-Castro Cuban exile neighborhood in Miami two weeks ago, a banner that said "Iraq Now, Cuba Later" alarmed officials in Havana.

"With an aggressive right-wing administration in Washington, we had to put some order here," a Cuban government official told Reuters. He said concern about U.S. intentions in Cuba had not been so high since the 1962 Cuban Missile crisis.

"We could not allow a Fifth Column that would destroy us. The survival of the revolution is at stake," he said.

The official said Cuban authorities believed President Bush (news - web sites) was capable of anything to please Cuban exiles in Florida, a key state for his re-election....

"What Set Off Castro?" read the headline over a short "Notebook" item up front in the April 21 Time magazine brought to my attention by the MRC's Tim Graham. An excerpt from the item by Tim Padgett:

....What set off Castro's fury? Those close to his inner circle say he feels insulted by the U.S. -- and unusually nervous. In hopes that the U.S. would relax its 41-year-old economic embargo, Castro, 76, had begun to soften his anti-Yanqui vitriol. Last year he even allowed Jimmy Carter to visit and speak out for democratic change. But the Bush Administration has delayed Congress' anti-embargo legislation indefinitely. At the same time, a bona fide dissident movement has been growing on the island. "These [dissidents] are just employees of Bush's efforts to maintain his criminal economic blockade," says a Cuban official -- although their indictments reveal crimes often no more serious than owning a fax machine. Executions in Cuba, while infrequent, aren't unusual for noncapital crimes. Rights advocates are worried that more may be in the offing.

ABC has discovered something more dangerous to Iraqis than U.S. troops who fail to protect their treasures and safeguard their stores of deadly germs: Christians who come bearing food.

Check out this promo for Friday's World News Tonight aired on Thursday's broadcast: "Tomorrow: As American religious groups bring food and aid to Iraqi families, will they also bring their religious views? Could this create new tensions? Watch World News Tonight."

But at least Iraqis will be healthy enough to have such concerns, assuming they are as threatened by it as Peter Jennings.

Federal employees and military personnel can donate to the Media Research Center through the Combined Federal Campaign or CFC. To donate to the MRC, use CFC #12489. Visit the CFC website for more information about giving opportunities in your workplace.