MSM Pushing For Civil War As Inauguration Nears, Clinton Supporters In Media Have Epic Meltdown

With just seven days to go until Donald Trump is inaugurated as the 45th President of the United States,
the desperation and outright lunacy from liberal snowflakes in the MSM
has reached new heights, as proposals range from holding an new presidential election, to placing legal restrictions on free speech, to redefining the truth as "malicious propaganda."WAR AGAINST INDEPENDENT MEDIASince
the election we have seen everything from literal hissy fits thrown by
Clinton supporters, to protests and riots, DDoS attacks against
conservative sites such as Drudge Report, advertisers attacked and
bowing down to the little cupcakes and snowflakes on the left against
Breitbart News, and a MSM war on Independent
Media by labeling them "fake news" and "Russian propaganda," but as
inauguration day gets closer, the attacks have reached new heights of
absurdity with members of the MSM pushing for actions that would lead to
civil war.

"The Russian state is far from alone in using hacking
as a form of espionage. What distinguishes Moscow’s activity is the
malicious way it appears to be using the information garnered and disseminating fake news to further pollute the political atmosphere.
The timing of leaks during the US election looked calculated to weaken
Hillary Clinton, the Democratic candidate," claims the FT editorial
view.

Notice the intellectual dishonesty of the editorial board in their
use of the term "fake news," when by all accounts, the information that
was "disseminated" which they admit in the same paragraph were "leaks,"
were actual emails from the DNC and the Clinton campaign..... there was nothing fake about them.
They wrote them. They colluded with the MSM. The DNC also colluded with
the Clinton campaign against Bernie Sanders. Those emails referenced
Hillary Clinton's health, multiple times.

Those emails exposed the truth of the corruption within the Democratic party.

Let
that sink in for a minute. The FT editorial board is actually saying
that disseminating the "truth" polluted the political atmosphere,
deliberately ignoring the fact that it was the corruption exposed on the
part of Hillary Clinton, the DNC and the MSM, that "polluted" the
election and cost her the election.

Then the FT editorial board gets to their main point, preventing the truth from being exposed by "restricting" free speech.

Berlin is considering imposing hefty fines on media
outlets that spread false and malicious information. This may seem an
undue restriction to freedom of speech but in the context of a propaganda war designed to undermine western democracy, it may be necessary to do more than enforce existing laws on libel and incitement.

Once again, they attempt to label the truth that was exposed by Wikileaks during the election as "propaganda."

Questions for the FT editorial board:
Are Americans entitled to the truth about candidates for presidency?
Does it matter who or where the truth comes from if it is indeed the
truth? Does the FT editorial board condone the corruption that was
exposed by Wikileaks? How does reporting the truth translate into the
meme "fake news?" Last but not least, how do they justify referring to
the truth as "propaganda?"

These
Clinton supporters are melting down, in epic fashion, as Trump's
inauguration nears and they start to finally realize they cannot stop
it. They are rooting for the protesters, hoping for chaos on January 20,
2017, probably even hoping for riots, but at the end of the day, Donald
Trump will be the President of the United States of America.

WRITER FOR THE HILL CALLS FOR NEW ELECTION BECAUSE CLINTON CORRUPTION WAS EXPOSEDThe war against the truth continues on, over at The Hill,
where op-ed writer Chris Edelson, is demanding a commission to
determine if "Russian meddling," using "influence efforts," affected the
outcome of the election, while admitting the information he is
referring to "included the content of emails stolen from the accounts of
Democratic party officials and disseminated by Wikileaks.."

Same
song, different singer, with one wanting to criminalize free speech,
truthful free speech at that, and the others demanding a whole new
election because the truth was revealed to voters before the election.

This included the use of propaganda to praise Trump and
denigrate Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, and, most insidiously,
disseminating stolen data obtained through Russian cyberespionage. This included the content of emails stolen from the accounts of Democratic party officials and disseminated by Wikileaks.

Trump himself certainly believed the information spread by Wikileaks
was helpful to his election chances; he talked about it incessantly on
the campaign trail. In the last month of the election alone, Trump
mentioned WikiLeaks 164 times. In an election decided by fewer than
100,000 votes in three states, it's quite likely that Russia's efforts
did make a difference

Extensive news coverage
often focused on WikiLeaks, which at the very least made it harder for
Clinton to advance her own message, and at worst created
confusion for voters and journalists who incorrectly thought the
WikiLeaks story was connected to an FBI investigation of Clinton’s email
server. Julian Assange timed the release of information to inflict
maximum political damage on Clinton and the leaked emails succeeded in
sowing discord among Democrats and causing tangible harm to the Clinton
campaign.

In other words, extensive coverage of the Wikileaks DNC and Podesta
emails, which were written BY the DNC, those communicating with the
DNC, including MSM personalities from all the large outlets, and the
Clinton campaign, made it harder for Clinton to change the subject and
hide the corruption within her campaign, the DNC and the MSM.

He
is right about one thing, the truthful information exposed by Wikileaks
did sow discord among Democrats and did cause damage to the Clinton
campaign..... as it should have! When corruption is revealed it should damage those that are exposed as being corrupt.

IT IS A WAR ON TRUTH, NOT JUST INDEPENDENT MEDIA

The
attacks on Independent Media, from calling them "fake news" to
accusations about spreading "Russian propaganda," stem from one thing
only... to distract from the information that was exposed by Wikileaks
about the Democratic party. It is a war on truth.

The reason the
Independent Media is the main target of the attacks is because they
hammered the truth relentlessly, they called out the MSM for their bias,
their corruptness, their deliberate push of Washington propaganda
against the American people, which they are still pushing, as clearly
evidenced recently when Washington Post lied to the public using
statements from unnamed "U.S. officials," with claims Russians hacked
into the U.S. power grid, then days later publicly admitted the Russians
did not do so.

That was "fake news," and propaganda.

BOTTOM LINE- THE MSM WANTS CIVIL WAR

The
U.S. government, using the MSM, have spent decades being the sole
arbiter of deciding on what Americans should know and when, using their
"influence" to determine elections and control the masses, to hide the
"truth" from the American people if said truth doesn't align with their
own ideology and goals. They failed and they are literally in meltdown
mode after Trump won the election, despite them throwing everything,
including the kitchen sink, at Trump, while promoting Clinton.

Right
now, given what we are witnessing with unapologetic, and outright fake
news coming out of the mainstream media, we may be facing the most
dangerous enemy of all as they are blatantly pushing to delegitimize the
next president and trying to encourage actions, such as the demand for a
new election, that would lead to an all-out civil war in America.

If they are allowed to re-establish their dominance, truth dies,
which brings me to something I read that is critical in this battle,
from Jon Rappoport, who has spent his 30+ years as a writer, trying to
expose the "fake news" by the MSM, and who believes that the "egg has
cracked" and now is the time to push even harder, expose the MSM each
and every time they publish their "fake news."

The bottom line goes to Jon:

Now we have a president-elect who, as I write this, is
holding a press conference and calling CNN fake news. Regardless of who
Trump is, that is a moment people should understand as a wild departure
from what happens in politics. It never happens. But it is happening.

This is shaking the egg until it cracks.

It’s called an opportunity.

—An opportunity for all of us to keep shaking the egg and exposing the liars, until there is no more egg.