The Curious Case(s) of the Published Denial of Rehearing

Twice this week the Fourth Circuit took the relatively unusual step of issuing published opinions on orders denying rehearing of a case. Ordinarily such orders are not published for the simple reason that there is no accompanying written opinion to publish. Not so this week, however.

Another instance in which the Fourth Circuit published a denial of petition for rehearing was in the high profile case of G.G., the transgender male Virginia high school student who sought to use the boy’s bathrooms at school. While Judge Niemeyer’s opinion related to that denial was styled as a dissent, in actuality he did not request a poll of the Court for rehearing en banc, and wrote to explain that his decision not to do so was to allow the case to get to the Supreme Court more quickly (“While I could call for a poll of the court in an effort to require counsel to reargue their positions before an en banc court, the momentous nature of the issue deserves an open road to the Supreme Court…Time is of the essence, and I can only urge the parties to seek Supreme Court review.”). Ultimately that case did get to the Supreme Court, but only to have the Supreme Court vacate the Fourth Circuit’s opinion and remand for further consideration in light of Trump administration’s rescission of the Obama administration guidance that had been the basis of the Fourth Circuit’s ruling.

It will be interesting to see whether either of the cases from this week winds up before the Supreme Court. If I were a betting man, I would probably put some serious money on the monument case making its way to D.C.

About Our Firm

Fox Rothschild LLP is a national law firm with 900 attorneys practicing in 27 offices coast to coast. We’ve been serving clients for more than a century, and we’ve been climbing the ranks of the nation’s largest firms for many years, according to both The Am Law 100 and The National Law Journal.Read More…