I wish I didn’t have to write this. I count myself a friend of the NDP/Green Alliance, and I had high hopes for the government’s new climate action plans. [1]

BC’s Ministry of Environment has published a series of Clean Growth Intentions Papers, with a deadline for public feedback of August 24th, in the heart of this fire and smoke-filled summer. In my head, I can see that they have been framed in a very positive way, emphasizing the multiple economic benefits of engaging in climate action, reframed as clean growth.

But the policies floated contain little that is new. They are really timid. And by downplaying the climate crisis almost to a state of mental non-existence, they have written the urgency out of the picture. In my heart, I feel as if they have been written by a holiday season policy-drone operating on auto-pilot. Hard words, but that’s what I feel.

These things will all become common, unless we get an urgent grip on what’s happening

Our forests are burning, not just in BC and California but also in Russia, Europe, and even in the Arctic Circle. A persistent heat wave has been breaking all weather records in Canada, the United States, Europe and the Middle East. Torrential downpours have been killing people and sweeping them off highways in dramatic mudslides. Flooding has inundated cities. Some cities in India, Pakistan and the Middle East have been having temperatures as high as 50°C, the level at which “human cells start to cook, blood thickens, muscles lock around the lungs and the brain is choked of oxygen.” A report published in Nature in August 2018 finds that the warming Arctic is slowing the circulation of the jet stream, causing prolonged weather patterns to get stuck, instead of moving on, making the weather less able to moderate itself.[2] These things will all become common, unless we get an urgent grip on what’s happening.[3]

This is crazy. A study published this August found that we are pushing our planet toward an irreversible ‘Hothouse Earth’, with catastrophic warming of 5°C or more causing an eventual long-term sea level rise (after many hundred years) of up to 70 metres. Its authors warn us that we may be much closer to the point-of-no-return than most people realize.[4] It suggests that because of numerous feedback factors, the path to catastrophic climate collapse is more like a cliff, and once you cross it, it triggers a rockslide that will quickly bring ruin.[5] Large areas of BC’s Lower Mainland are less than three meters above sea level.[6]

A few are turning climate despair into climate determination, but nowhere near enough

People are becoming afraid at what they see being reported in the daily news. They are anxious. They worry. They feel dread. When they see their elected politicians doing so little about it, they become cynical. And when they become cynical, they don’t bother to vote. A few are turning climate despair into climate determination, but nowhere near enough.

Speaking globally, the British economist Nicholas Stern has warned us that “The speed of action is still far too slow. Emissions have to be peaking now and turn down very sharply. We have not yet acted on the scale needed, even though the ingredients are there.”[7]

Prof. Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, head of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, and a senior advisor to German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the European Union, wrote in the foreword to the new Australian report What Lies Beneath: The Understatement of Existential Climate Risk: “Climate change is now reaching the end-game, where very soon humanity must choose between taking unprecedented action, or accepting that it has been left too late and bear the consequences.”[8]

So what unprecedented action is the BC government proposing to address the advancing catastrophe? It feels a bit like ‘punt it into the future and let the next generation sort it out’, with a goal to reduce emissions by 40% by 2030 and 80% by 2050, but without annual goals or carbon budgets, and without the policies needed to achieve it. Our NDP MLAs should be embarrassed. Our Green Party MLAs should be screaming from the legislative chamber rooftops. It’s just not good enough. I don’t expect the Liberal MLAs to contribute much; they have never seemed to understand the issue.

LNG means Leave in N the Ground. It’s a technology of the past, not of the future

And what about liquefied natural gas, which is not even mentioned in the paper on A Clean Growth Program for Industry? BC’s carbon emissions in 2015 were 63.3 million tonnes (Mt) a year and rising. The climate plan requires a reduction to 38 Mt by 2030. The carbon emissions from the proposed LNG Canada facility at Kitimat and the Woodfibre facility to be built near Squamish will increase them by 8-12 Mt a year. We need to learn that LNG means Leave in N the Ground. It’s a technology of the past, not of the future.

The Liberal government used to claim that LNG would reduce emissions in China by replacing coal. That was never true, since it didn’t account for the fugitive methane emissions from fracking, without which the gas can’t be extracted, and which may make it as bad a coal.[9] Nor did it account for the possibility that it would be used to power additional growth in China, or to replace renewable energy. The use of such arguments assumed that people wouldn’t have much interest in the details. The development of LNG is completely incompatible with the need to reduce our emissions. LNG is an old play from an old playbook, sold by big energy corporations to unwitting governments with a promise to create jobs at the expense of future generations.

In 2007, the provincial goal was a 33% reduction by 2020. By 2015, our emissions had fallen by just 2%. During that time our GDP increased by 16%, so we’re making progress, thanks to the carbon tax and to Vancouver’s commitment to 100% renewable energy, but we are way off track from our goal. The NDP’s revised goal of a 40% reduction by 2030 is good, but insufficient to prevent climate catastrophe if other nations and jurisdictions adopted the same goal.

So what is needed?

1. We need 100% Renewable Energy by 2040

We need it for all purposes, at the latest, with 50% by 2030. Various jurisdictions have embraced a 100% target, including Vancouver, Victoria and Saanich.[10] We don’t need to know in detail how to get there. NASA did not know how to get to the moon when Kennedy made his commitment in 1961. Take technology, add innovation and resources, add determination, stir until ready. Battery technology is improving all the time, and there’s a vast amount we can get on with while electric vehicle technology improves for trucks, ships, airplanes, and industrial equipment.

2. We need a 95% GHG Reduction by 2040

We need to up the current goal of a 40% reduction by 2030, 60% by 2040, 80% by 2050. To minimize the risk of climate disaster we ideally need to reach 100% tomorrow. That’s not achievable, but 2040 is. As progress gathers steam, and as people gain confidence that its possible and awareness about the climate reality sinks in, we could advance the goal to 2035.

3. We need Legally Mandated Annual Carbon Budgeting

We need this to hold the government accountable to these goals. Britain has been successful with this approach, reducing their emissions to the level they were in 1890.[11] If the ministers of the relevant ministries meet their annual targets they should receive a bonus, to be given to the charity or non-profit of their choice. For a good summary of government carbon budgeting, I recommend Marc Lee’s Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives submission in response to these Intentions Papers.[12]

4. We need Province-Wide Public Engagement

We also need a movie to show the scale of the looming catastrophe and to get people excited about BC becoming a leader in what’s possible, showing examples from around the world where it’s already happening. The failure to focus on the energy transition and its many solutions has been the bane of the climate movement for years.

The Age of Fossil fuels lasted for 300 years. The Solar Age will last for three billion years, and with each passing year the efficiency of renewable energy will increase and its cost will continue to fall. This transition is technologically smart, just as the transition from horses to cars was smart in the years between 1890 and 1920, ridding city streets of a plague of piled-up horse manure. Far too many climate presentations focus on the negatives, not the positive vision of a solar world.

I blame Al Gore. In his movie An Inconvenient Truth he only just a cursory nod to the solutions, as the credits rolled. I blame myself, too, for not having had whatever it would have needed to make the amazing climate solutions movie that people should have been celebrating around the world for years.

5. We need to Stand Firm Against the Pipeline

The Kinder Morgan/Justin Trudeau Memorial Pipeline will enable tar-sands corporations to pump yet more carbon into Earth’s distressingly overheated atmosphere, while endangering our west coast ocean. I thank the NDP for its determined stand so far.

6. We need All New Cars to be EVs by 2025

We need to follow Norway‘s example, ending conventional car sales by 2025, not by 2040 as the Intentions Paper proposes.[13] We need continued support for new electric vehicles and for their charging infrastructure. By 2025, a new electric vehicle with a range of 400km will cost the same as a gasoline vehicle.[14]

The Clean Transportation Intentions Paper suggests continuing the $5,000 rebate for electric vehicles but actually phasing it out once sales hit 5% of new vehicles. This is not how Norway has progressed to the point that more than 50% of all new car sales are now electric.[15] Electric trucks[16], short-haul passenger planes[17] and ferries[18] are all being developed. The Norwegians are even building an electric container ship for local ocean travel, to be delivered in 2020.[19]

7. We need Massive Support for Urban Cycling

We need to aim to achieve levels similar to those in Holland (27% of all trips)[20] and Copenhagen (41% of all trips to work and study).[21] This will have the welcome side-benefits of reducing healthcare costs and making people happier. Where there are hills, e-bikes eliminate gravity. The Intentions Paper hardly mentions cycling.

8. We need a Huge Expansion of Transit

This means electric transit. China has 400,000 electric buses on the road.[22] Together, transit, cycling, car-sharing, Pay-As-You-Drive vehicle insurance and closer commutes[23] could end the increasingly long traffic congestion delays that are so frustrating, and make our cities instead happy, healthy, delightful and green. The Intentions Paper barely mentions transit.

9. We need all New Buildings to be Zero Carbon by 2024

We need to learn from the example of Brussels, Belgium. In 2011 they announced that every new building in the city must meet the Passive House standard by 2015. Since then, every new building, large or small, public or private, has been super-efficient and carbon neutral. They needed just four years for carpenters to train in the new approach.

In Victoria, Mark and Rob Bernhardt have been building Passive Houses for only 4.4% more than the cost of conventional building – and their homes have no heating bills.[24] The Clean, Efficient Buildings Intentions Paper simply re-states the current goal that most new construction will need to be ‘net zero energy ready’ by 2032, which is code (one hopes) for zero carbon. The building industry has been whining about change, and the BC government and some ENGOs have bought into it.

10. We need Building Energy Labelling

We need to require all buildings to be energy-labeled to rate their efficiency by 2021, so that buyers and leasers know what they’re getting. The Intentions Paper says the province is considering this, but without any target date. I took part in a government workshop considering this ten years ago. Why are we not seeing any progress? Someone, somewhere, doesn’t give a damn.

11. We need No Oil-Heated Buildings by 2025

We need to follow this with no gas-heated buildings by 2030, accompanied by a world-class program to support building retrofits, from single family homes to condos and commercial buildings.

BC Hydro does not really want us to make our homes more electricity-efficient, since they are already generating a surplus, and the unfortunately-approved Site C Dam will turn that into an expensive and embarrassing surplus.

It’s not electricity that matters for climate planning, however, since our electricity is already in effect 100% zero-carbon. It’s heating, which means insulating our buildings much more to reduce heat-loss, and using district heat systems and electric heat-pumps to replace gas and oil.

The Intentions Paper supports doing something in this direction, but it’s not clear what. The Pembina Institute’s response to the Intention Papers, while mistakenly stating that they “give us reason for optimism”, is excellent on what’s needed for our buildings, but fails to call for a speeding up of the proposed changes in keeping with the scale of the looming climate catastrophe.[25]

12. We need a Climate Test for all New Industrial Projects,and Zero Carbon by 2040

We need yearly targets for reduction and sectoral councils involving business, labour and government to plan the annual reductions, as proposed by Marc Lee, Senior Economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. The carbon tax should continue to increase, as planned, and the Clean Growth Program for Industry Intention Paper quite wisely in my view (but not Marc’s) calls for some of the carbon tax revenue to be used in a Clean Industry Fund to help industry reduce its emissions, in the form of incentives.

These three areas – transportation (39%), buildings (10%) and industry (40%) – account for 89% of BC’s emissions.[26] The Ministry will release more Intentions Papers next year covering such things as Global Energy Opportunities, Low Carbon Energy, Tech Strategy, the Transportation System, and Communities and Waste. There’s no mention of forests, which are an increasing source of emissions, of the need to protect the remaining ancient old growth forests, which store so much carbon, or of the livestock industry (people eating meat and dairy), which causes 15% of the global climate crisis.

There’s also no mention of the urgent need for carbon sequestration, to begin re-absorbing the 300 Gigatonnes of surplus carbon that has accumulated in the atmosphere, and no mention of fracking for natural gas in North-East BC, which produces so much methane.

And there’s no mention of public education and engagement, the absence of which is the primary reason why climate indifference and denial have been able to spread, casting dust and delay into the debate.

In terms of jobs and economic growth, implementing these policies will create tens of thousands of jobs with decent wages, many more than will be lost. The result will be loads of technical innovation, and cities that are embarking on a green urban renaissance, to the delight of their residents.[27]

*

These Intention Papers are as weak as the sky is yellow in our ominous forest-burning world

I’m seventy years old, so I don’t have time to dilly-dally while the catastrophe that is going to wreak so much pain, misery, discomfort, death and economic distress grows stronger, month by month. I may have another thirty years, or I may drop dead tomorrow. I need to speak truth to power – to speak truth to the forest fires smoke that is warning our province of what’s to come. Because of our forests, and the fact that Vancouver and the Lower Mainland are so close to sea-level, BC stands to suffer a greater negative impact from the climate crisis than any other province in Canada.

Globally, we are heading for an unmitigated disaster. I have worked in the climate trenches for twenty-five years. I know this stuff inside-out. I have written two award-winning books on the solutions, which have been praised by climate scientists like James Hansen and by climate activists like Bill McKibben. I founded the BC Sustainable Energy Association fifteen years ago, to try to make an impact. I co-founded the Victoria Car-Share Cooperative (now part of MODO). It troubles me to see so little progress. These Intentions Papers are the unwitting prelude to disaster. We are selling our children and grandchildren down the river, to struggle or drown in an increasingly dark future.

This is an urgent personal plea to The Honourable John Horgan, our Premier; to George Heyman, our Environment and Climate Change Strategy Minister; to Selina Robinson, our Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing; to Claire Trevena, our Minister of Transportation; to Doug Donaldson, our Minister of Forests; to all their Deputy Ministers and ADMs; and to all our NDP and Green Party MLAs. Please, do not let this pass. These Intention Papers are as weak as the sky is yellow in our ominous forest-burning world.

Guy Dauncey is the author of Stormy Weather: 101 Solutions to Global Climate Change (2001), The Climate Challenge: 101 Solutions to Global Warming (2009), and Journey to the Future: A Better World is Possible. (2016). Founder and Past-President of the BC Sustainable Energy Association. Honorary Member of the Planning Institute of BC. Fellow of the Royal Society for the Arts. Fellow of the Findhorn Foundation. He lives in Yellow Point, on Vancouver Island.

I have been thinking about this too, I am deeply concerned that 2040 or 2030 is to far away. We need change ASAP! I would like to see the year 2020 to be when we have prepped ourselves for significant change. Change that is taken on by each and every person, is it through own action or when already done helping others to minimize their footprint.
Since our government institutions have shown to be corrupted by corporate interests and therefore to be totally ineffective, WE, the people, MUST TAKE THE LEAD!

Thank you SO much, Guy, people can make a difference, and if we can get Islanders to stop burning wood in the winter time- we’d have “some” air to breathe, now that our summers are now, also toxic smokey air. They just don’t “get it” 😦

Hard to believe politicians are reading the same science as the rest of us. You’d think we had all the time in the world to slowly transition off fossil fuels. We don’t have enough resources to put out the fires, but we have enough to buy an overpriced old pipeline and build a new one. No one seems to care that the tar sands are killing people, and have been for years. Mostly indigenous, though, and it’s clear that the rest of Canada couldn’t care less.

How superbly well stated and incredibly ironic to say “We don’t have enough resources to put out the fires, but we have enough to buy an overpriced old pipeline and build a new one“!

However if the truth be told, “we” as used here gives us the false sense of inclusiveness when in fact we the many are not the ones who refuse to take the power of the public purse to proactively put out the fires before they start or subsidize the fossil fuel industry.

But we the many have the power to democratically and peacefully collaborate with one another to common advantage for all if we take the steps to no longer allow the few to divide and rule over us through plurality politics.

Democracy is based on majority rule, not minority rule and we can much more effectively find are common United and collaborative voice through an insistence of having runoff elections when no candidate has an outright majority. However with but a bit of thinking we can realize that the ranked ballot achieves exactly the same as a runoff election, but without the cost, complexity and delay of a runoff election.

Nor do we need to wait until our taskmasters give us the ranked ballot as we can effectively organize our own pre-election vote123 ranked ballot poll and with this information on voting day speak as one on voting day, thereby putting an end to the rule of the few at the expense of the many.

Very good article to share with media around the Internet Guy. Have you looked at the website Global Forest Watch? If I could attach an image of world wide forest fires I would. The smoke has reduced slightly here in Edmonton from the fires in BC and California as the air current shifts. I am of the belief our small population of 35 million have and are being led off a cliff.

Question: Are the people living in towns and cities in BC looking at their civic politics? Our Edmonton council and mayor talk the big talk about The Way We Green. At the same time they approve projects that wipe out hectares of mature trees city wide along with ones that will further erode the river valley. We need to nail the civic officials, since they were handed billions for infrastructure without any conditions, tying them to a better environment. Your 12 points are achievable.