Content Count

Joined

Last visited

Community Reputation

About Guppy

I'm sorry but that's just wrong.
You can do this ever since 2.71 ( current stable is 2.76 )
Baking in general can be a hazzle to set up, this addon (no affiliation)
https://cgcookiemarkets.com/all-products/baketool/
Makes it a breeze - I know a lot of people dont like the idea of paying for addons to free software, but unless your time is worthless it paying for it self

To parapharase;
"There are people getting shot in africa every day - you getting run over is not an issue..."
Honestly I do not care how many ****ty ports you are running, the editor is a a state currently where it is almost but not quite usable. Worse it's impossible for the users to trust a software that will randomly lock up or corrupt the screen to the point were you have to close and just hope the your recent edits are saved.

While he is annoying he has a point. Using the Linux editor is like using your TV remote with oven mitts on -your are technically using your TV but would it not be nice to actually be in charge of what your watching?
If you not yet realised this then you will once your usage have become a bit more advanced

Unfortunately this is the joy of DRM - you are entirely at the mercy of the provider to continue to support the product.
I've no doubt that there will be a hack out soon that will allow you to at least play the game, but I believe that save game progress was stored server side? if so then that's lost

if your moving the camera just 1 px I'd not worry about parallax - more likely rounding errors may mean you end up with 9 identical images.
Another solution could be to move the camera closer and do X seperate frames that each fit inside the original view cone - if that makes sense.

I don't see why your messing with camera projection and stitching ( unless you want to make panoramas ofcourse )
Have a look here;
http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-e-m5-successor-has-sensor-shift-to-create-up-to-40-megapixel-images-on-the-fly/
Grabbing 9 screen shots shifted like in the above link should take 0.15s with a bit of extra time for post processing
But maybe I'm missing something ?