Russell, perhaps the newspapers and dialog I included with my grievance against the attorney who represented Roland Rios and Associates, Jose Garza, will carry some weight with the Texas Bar Association - you can not file a grievance... More ›

Russell, perhaps the newspapers and dialog I included with my grievance against the attorney who represented Roland Rios and Associates, Jose Garza, will carry some weight with the Texas Bar Association - you can not file a grievance against a FIRM just an individual so I did! At minimum, the 3 recalled individuals should be financially liable for every cent billed prior to the Council voting to hire this firm! And, I am hoping when the new Council is seated, one of the first things they do is fire Rosenberg and Associates!

The funny (or perhaps ironic) thing about this whole mess is this - Judge Peoples didn't rule that Jim wasn't a resident. He only ruled that the city council had the authority to decide whether Jim could sit on the body or... More ›

The funny (or perhaps ironic) thing about this whole mess is this - Judge Peoples didn't rule that Jim wasn't a resident. He only ruled that the city council had the authority to decide whether Jim could sit on the body or not. So, fast forward until the "gang of 3 are gone" and the next council can decide he IS a resident and can serve! Won't that make this whole conniving, sorted mess an even larger waste of tax payer $$ than it already is. Also, note that Tejada is saying they're filing a motion to make Jim pay, which means Jim will fight that too and Rios & co will make even more money off the city - and the odds are not in the city's favor to get Jim to pay. Since Rios was engaged illegally and as a sole-source contract without justification, one has to wonder if Danny has an interest in what Rios makes on this whole fiasco.

Editor: with all the references to the "city charter" I find myself wanting to read it. How much trouble would it be to post a p d f of the charter on this site. I Google it but there are several. I sure you would... More ›

Editor: with all the references to the "city charter" I find myself wanting to read it. How much trouble would it be to post a p d f of the charter on this site. I Google it but there are several. I sure you would know the most recent one.

So people are commenting about what Danny wrote but its not any better than posting a picture of the attorneys and the 3 stating they won and there will be a recall election. How is that ok and not what Danny wrote.

Russell Dickerson you going to run for council I hear there are 2 empty seats and since you think that JM is all that maybe he will show you the ways to lie and quote books and cut and paste from them. Just saying you always... More ›

Russell Dickerson you going to run for council I hear there are 2 empty seats and since you think that JM is all that maybe he will show you the ways to lie and quote books and cut and paste from them. Just saying you always have much to say and seems that you are strong to stand against the evil of this town.

Not entirely accurate, they all declined questions.. until just as the meeting was being adjourned and then Danny decided to spout some propaganda.. and then it was adjourned. Their greatest fault is their inability to see... More ›

Not entirely accurate, they all declined questions.. until just as the meeting was being adjourned and then Danny decided to spout some propaganda.. and then it was adjourned. Their greatest fault is their inability to see that the citizens of this city aren't interested in their personal vendetta against Jim. To hear them tell it, Jim is somehow denying a "city resident" the right to hold that seat - but he ran UNOPPOSED and still got 270 votes! No other citizen filed to run for the position! That is 63 MORE votes than Nieto got in his re-election! CLEARLY the voters of this town want Jim on the council and aren't bothered by Danny's fixation on where he sleeps. They claim to represent the people, but in reality they represent noone but themselves. Now they have a choice - resign or face the electorate. Danny has no honor, he will stick it to the end.. we'll see about the others. At least I hope this means the stink will hang around their necks and they will never hold office again! After Danny's obvious failure as mayor, I can't believe anyone would vote for him again.

This article is so misleading...the judge made no ruling so let's see...the city council has to follow the city charter...well ok if they don't make it to the May election then it will be on the November ballot...but by then... More ›

This article is so misleading...the judge made no ruling so let's see...the city council has to follow the city charter...well ok if they don't make it to the May election then it will be on the November ballot...but by then their terms are up and so really is it a recall election. All that happened in all this they gave good money to an attorney that really didn't do nothing.

Yes, he must be delirious based on his behavior last night. Talk about denial, all three of them are out in left field. Was he in the courtroom during the hearing in order to make his determination? He calls this chaos, he... More ›

Yes, he must be delirious based on his behavior last night. Talk about denial, all three of them are out in left field. Was he in the courtroom during the hearing in order to make his determination? He calls this chaos, he is so right but this chaos was caused by the 3 not by the citizens. The petitioners have a good attorney. Unlike them, the city attorney is a real joke.

FOLLOWING ARE POSTS FROM TEJADAS FACEBOOK PAGE...
the guy must be delirious, or worse, a typical liberal politician.Did he hear the judge ?
"Floresville is a great place to live and do business. Coming together and... More ›

FOLLOWING ARE POSTS FROM TEJADAS FACEBOOK PAGE...
the guy must be delirious, or worse, a typical liberal politician.Did he hear the judge ?
"Floresville is a great place to live and do business. Coming together and working together determines our future. From all of this chaos, the laws of our state , and our City Charter were upheld as ruled by 2 District Judges."
"2 great victories for the City of Floresville were announced today.
1. Jim Miller dropped his lawsuit against the City of Floresville. Estimated cost. 60,000 . A motion has been filed to recover our cost.
2. Judge Richard Alcala denied writ of mandamus. The recall process must follow the charter provisions.
A great day for Floresville !"

Tejada, Ortiz, & Castillo have no shame for not respecting the citizens of Floresville. All 3 need to step down for they do not honor their vows under oath. They know exactly the commitment to their assigned duties. And to... More ›

Tejada, Ortiz, & Castillo have no shame for not respecting the citizens of Floresville. All 3 need to step down for they do not honor their vows under oath. They know exactly the commitment to their assigned duties. And to do a NO SHOW is unacceptable- especially in a crucial time like this, let someone else do the job that is ready and willing. I agree with LaLa.............

It is absolutely disgusting how these 3 show no respect for the citizens of Floresville!! Tejada and Ortiz talk and laugh, not paying attention to what the citizens are saying. What went wrong here? How did things get this way?... More ›

It is absolutely disgusting how these 3 show no respect for the citizens of Floresville!! Tejada and Ortiz talk and laugh, not paying attention to what the citizens are saying. What went wrong here? How did things get this way? The recall can't happen soon enough.

And, I bet money, marbles and chalk that none of three show up for the Public Meeting tonight - it would certainly give them the opportunity to explain why they should NOT be recalled - may be the only chance they get.

@LaLa As noted above, the city is compelled to follow the charter which is 1) have the hearing tonight, 2) give the respondents 10 days to decide if they're going to resign or see if they can withstand the vote-of-no-confidence,... More ›

@LaLa As noted above, the city is compelled to follow the charter which is 1) have the hearing tonight, 2) give the respondents 10 days to decide if they're going to resign or see if they can withstand the vote-of-no-confidence, which is what the recall vote would be, and 3) then the city council must call the special election. The judge didn't give the city the wiggle room to use the state's election schedule to render the recall moot - which has been their plan all along. I suspect should the city not do so, the judge may rule them in contempt for he's already reminded them of their duty. Castillo couldn't even get elected in the first place, she was appointed by her buddy to Mayor so she knows that after all this there is zero chance of her withstanding the recall, and I'll bet Tejeda and Ortiz are similarly doomed should they stand for recall. If they are so convinced that they've done nothing wrong, they wouldn't be delaying and stalling. By next fall, you'll have a whole new city government - make it count!