Do you think it's an important 'right' that you can obtain "the personal opinions or views of an individual employed by a government institution given in the course of employment" …as it relates to you?

In connection to the 'implant' issue of June 05, 2002 in Cathedral Dental Center I'm forced to continue to make these boycott calls.

Today I called and Katz gave the phone to an uninformed 'colleague' at the Lewvan Clinic - where she is manager [and likely part owner].

So this guy [with a strong south Asian accent] was claiming to be a "psychiatrist" - he made quite a number of pathetic and derogatory comments. Why the continued fixation on trying to convince me that I'm crazy?! How pathetic is that!

Anyway the alleged doctor [who is really a podiatrist] blurted out - "you deserved what she did to you" - then he all of a sudden had nothing more to say!

Mrs. Katz just cannot bring herself to tell the truth - yet.

I had TWO x-rays by two independent medical professionals and their implant was found in my left maxilla sinus.

I'm telling the truth and it is disgusting that this Charter of Rights and Freedoms violation remains UNRESOLVED after nearly 10 years.

The LAWFUL boycott will continue until these miscreants do the right thing and resolve it. They better give up all their false profiling and the nasty comments - trying to bait me to become angry/nasty - I'm as steadfast as can be and I will NOT become nasty nor angry.

God bless the Moose Jaw Police Service/Sask Justice - for not interfering in this lawful boycott!!!

The boycott calling of wascana dental in Regina has resumed. Thank God for Google Phone! How long before Falconer can manipulate the police to come to my door as her order-carriers? Katz was able to get them here >the day after< Mom's funeral This time...we'll end up in court. I think a judge will see the impossibly hopeless nature of getting closure out of them people.

In connection to the 'implant' issue of June 05, 2002 in Cathedral Dental Center I'm forced to continue to make these boycott calls.

Today I called and Katz gave the phone to an uninformed 'colleague' at the Lewvan Clinic - where she is manager [and likely part owner].

So this guy [with a strong south Asian accent] was claiming to be a "psychiatrist" - he made quite a number of pathetic and derogatory comments. Why the continued fixation on trying to convince me that I'm crazy?! How pathetic is that!

Anyway the alleged doctor [who is really a podiatrist] blurted out - "you deserved what she did to you" - then he all of a sudden had nothing more to say!

Mrs. Katz just cannot bring herself to tell the truth - yet.

I had TWO x-rays by two independent medical professionals and their implant was found in my left maxilla sinus.

I'm telling the truth and it is disgusting that this Charter of Rights and Freedoms violation remains UNRESOLVED after nearly 10 years.

The LAWFUL boycott will continue until these miscreants do the right thing and resolve it. They better give up all their false profiling and the nasty comments - trying to bait me to become angry/nasty - I'm as steadfast as can be and I will NOT become nasty nor angry.

God bless the Moose Jaw Police Service/Sask Justice - for not interfering in this lawful boycott!!!

The boycott calling of wascana dental in Regina has resumed. Thank God for Google Phone! How long before Falconer can manipulate the police to come to my door as her order-carriers? Katz was able to get them here >the day after< Mom's funeral This time...we'll end up in court. I think a judge will see the impossibly hopeless nature of getting closure out of them people.

The telephone boycott of Wascana dental in Regina resumed on November 20, 2012 and - it continues - God bless the police - they have not interfered and - if there is a visit to come then - i will be prepared to go to court and defend my actions.

Amazingly, this time they cannot block the Google Phone, i just wish i wasn't STILL begging for rights in Canada - that were ripped away A VERY LONG 10 years 7 months and four days ago.

Hey it's not like i want to call - actually i have nothing to say to them - the inconvenience of receiving these calls are merely to urge them to at last act properly drop the concealment's and be responsible - there is a better chance of that happening - by not permitting the matter to be forgotten.

The telephone boycott of Wascana dental in Regina resumed on November 20, 2012 and - it continues - God bless the police - they have not interfered and - if there is a visit to come then - i will be prepared to go to court and defend my actions.

Amazingly, this time they cannot block the Google Phone, i just wish i wasn't STILL begging for rights in Canada - that were ripped away A VERY LONG 10 years 7 months and 10 days ago...

It's like a lifetime ago this all began - but be damned if these miscreants will prevail...

Well this boycott has to take another approach - as the dentist conscripted into the June 05, 2002 procedure - has become complacent in this boycott.

Dr. Falconer and - the [now previous] owner of Cathedral Dental Center have had over 6 years to bring proper closure to this matter, I have given extensive opportunities to do this - I even re-offered complete legal immunity to Dr. Falconer and still she chooses to evade this matter.

Thus, since I do not live in Regina and I cannot physically protest at the Wascana Clinic - I have little choice but to use a phone campaign - to call and remind her office - often - that this matter has gone on long enough and that the dentist can bring it to just closure - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - to resolve the matter...."the squeaky wheel".

Naturally, these calls are not harassment. It should be noted that on the point of 'telephone harassment' s. 372(3) of the Criminal Code uses specific language:

"Every one who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass any person, makes or causes to be made repeated telephone calls to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."

A specific 'defense' wording is there for a reason. The language of the Code contemplates that there are times an individual might indeed have a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" to another individual/business.

I assert that, under 'these' circumstances, one could reasonably argue having a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" - in connection to a boycott of this business - for a resolution of this outstanding and 'irregular' June 05, 2002 incident.

Further, the consideration of such a legitimate defense comes with application of mens rea, which is a legal concept surrounding 'state of mind' or in other-words 'intent'.

Of course, such so-called "repeated telephone calls" - as part of a boycott are not intended to "harass" - nor even to "alarm or annoy" her and/or her office!

I DO NOT LIKE MAKING THESE CALLS - AS I HAVE NO DESIRE TO COMMUNICATE WITH THIS DENTIST - I SINCERELY WANT TO FORGET ABOUT THIS DENTIST...BUT NOT BEFORE THIS DENTIST TAKES CARE OF HER RESPONSIBILITIES IN THIS MATTER.

I SHOULDN’T HAVE HAD TO ENDURE ‘ANY’ OF THIS – EVEN NOW – I HOPE THAT AT LAST THE NOTED 'AGENCY' SHALL CONTACT ME AND - HONORABLY - SETTLE/RESOLVE THIS LONG-SUFFERING MATTER.

(That was posted Tue Nov 22, 2011 @ 6:17 pm)

So it must be noted that I waited over a year - from the time I got a radiology report and doctor's letter on this matter - there was a whole year from them to at last do the right thing - but instead of at last dealing with this matter - they continued to conceal.

Dr. Falconer and Mary Jane Katz - the [now previous] owner of Cathedral Dental Center have had over 6 years to bring proper closure to this matter, I have given extensive opportunities to do this...

Thus, since I do not live in Regina and I cannot physically protest at the Wascana Clinic - I have little choice but to use a phone campaign - to call and remind her office - often - that this matter has gone on long enough and that the dentist can bring it to just closure - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - to resolve the matter...."the squeaky wheel".

Naturally, these calls are not harassment. It should be noted that on the point of 'telephone harassment' s. 372(3) of the Criminal Code uses specific language:

"Every one who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass any person, makes or causes to be made repeated telephone calls to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."

A specific 'defense' wording is there for a reason. The language of the Code contemplates that there are times an individual might indeed have a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" to another individual/business.

I assert that, under 'these' circumstances, one could reasonably argue having a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" - in connection to a boycott of this business - for a resolution of this outstanding and 'irregular' June 05, 2002 incident.

Further, the consideration of such a legitimate defense comes with application of mens rea, which is a legal concept surrounding 'state of mind' or in other-words 'intent'.

Of course, such so-called "repeated telephone calls" - as part of an economic boycott are not intended to "harass" - nor even to "alarm or annoy" her and/or her office!

I DO NOT LIKE MAKING THESE CALLS - AS I HAVE NO DESIRE TO COMMUNICATE WITH THIS DENTIST - I SINCERELY WANT TO FORGET ABOUT THIS DENTIST...BUT NOT BEFORE THIS DENTIST TAKES CARE OF HER RESPONSIBILITIES IN THIS MATTER.

I was told by Gary Dickson, the Privacy Commissioner, "in cases like this we usually try for a settlement to the complainant's satisfaction before preparing a report" "they have to make you happy and whole and only you know what can make you happy and whole"

When speaking of a so-called meeting that was to ensue at his office he stated - "bring your shopping list".

Of course that meeting never took place and I was later refused a report [in November 2006] - a report that was already complete [in May 2006] as confirmed in emails [they are posted in this thread] to me from his assistant in May 2006.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou cannot attach files in this forumYou can download files in this forum