Thoughts on Life, Love, Politics, Hypocrisy and Coming Out in Mid-Life

Saturday, January 19, 2013

House Republicans Blink Short Term

While it is no long term solution, apparently the House GOP members came to one useful short term agreement while conferencing in the Burwell Plantation Room at Kingsmill near Williamsburg: they are set to vote on a three (3) month extension of the nation's debt ceiling to allow more time to hopefully reach a sane agreement that can clear both houses of Congress and the White House. Whether the move will translate into a long term solution will remain to be seen. Perhaps these members of the GOP are waking up to the reality that they have more to fear from moderates and independents than they do from the lunatics and saboteurs of the GOP base come 2014. The Washington Post looks at the short term agreement. These are article highlights:

WILLIAMSBURG - House Republicans backed away from their resolute position on the federal debt
ceiling, announcing Friday that they will move next week to boost the
government’s borrowing authority for three months. The move is a retreat from the earlier insistence among some Republicans that
any such debt increase would have to be matched by spending cuts of equal or
greater size.

A vote on the proposal is expected Wednesday. If successful, the measure
would postpone what was expected to be a major clash with the White House over
government spending. The new strategy, crafted at a three-day retreat here that ended Friday, is one sign that Republicans, battered at the polls
last November and saddled with low public approval, are looking for new ways to
litigate their differences with President Obama and congressional Democrats over
spending and deficits.

Under the bill, Republicans will seek to raise the debt limit to allow
government borrowing through mid-April — long enough, they say, to give both
chambers time to pass a budget for the next fiscal year. If either chamber
failed to adopt a budget by April 15, that chamber’s members would then have
their congressional pay withheld.

The GOP’s new path is an attempt to acknowledge the reality that the party
controls only the House while preserving a tactical advantage that could force
long-term reductions in spending, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin told reporters
Thursday.

An administration official said the White House viewed the move as a major
concession by House Republicans. Though Obama has in the past insisted on increases of sufficient length to
calm financial markets and remove any doubt about the ability of the U.S.
government to pay its bills, the official said the president would accept a
“clean” short-term extension that did not include cuts.

Besides removing the immediate threat, a short-term debt ceiling increase
would shift the debate to areas where Republicans believe they have more
leverage. Those include automatic spending cuts set to hit the military and domestic
programs in early March, as well as the expiration of a funding mechanism
keeping the government running at the end of that month.

Politically, it could also transfer attention from the troubles of the House
GOP — which polls show Americans blame for Washington’s fiscal gridlock — to the
Democratic Senate, which has not approved a budget resolution since Obama’s
first year in office.

Republican aides said they were confident the three-month extension would pass
the House, despite pledges from some fiscal hawks to use the debt ceiling fight
to win concessions from Democrats on entitlement spending. Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the chairman of the Republican Study
Committee, which represents a bloc of the House’s most conservative members,
issued a joint statement with three former chairmen of the group endorsing the
idea. “The American people expect Washington to pass a budget and live by it,” they
said.

One area where huge savings could be achieved would be in moving the nation forward towards a private option or better yet a single payer health care system combined with the federal government negotiating costs with pharmaceutical manufacturers. The USA spends the most per capita on health care of any advanced country and yet we have the least efficient delivery of services. Only the truly wealthy have first class medical care. Will the GOP consider this kind of rational approach to cost containment? Of course not. When they talk about reducing spending, they are talking out of both sides of their mouths.

Translate This Page

Contact Me to Order Title Work

LGBT Legal Services

About Me

Out gay attorney in a committed relationship; formerly married and father of three wonderful children; sometime activist and political/news junkie; survived coming out in mid-life and hope to share my experiences and reflections with others.
In the career/professional realm, I have merged my aw firm - Michael B. Hamar, P.C. - with Dillon Law group PLC and become affiliated with Liberty Title & Escrow Co.. I practice in the areas of real estate, estate planning (Wills, Trusts, Advanced Medical Directives, Financial Powers of Attorney, Durable Medical Powers of Attorney); business law and commercial transactions; formation of corporations and LLC's; and legal services to the gay, lesbian and transgender community, including birth certificate amendment.

Disclaimer on Opinions and Content

This Blog contains content that may be innapropriate for readers under the legal age of 18. IF YOU ARE UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, PLEASE LEAVE NOW. Thank you

This is an opinion and commentary blog and the opinions and contents of this Blog - including opinions expressed concerning opponents of LGBT equality - are the opinions only of the individual blogger and should not be attributed to any other individuals or to any organization of which the blogger is a past or current member.

Followers

Michael-in-Norfolk disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability, or availability of information or material displayed on this site and does not claim credit for any images or articles featured on this site, unless otherwise noted. All visual content is copyrighted to it's respectful owners. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies, and Michael-in-Norfolk does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. If you own rights to any of the images or articles, and do not wish them to appear on this site, please contact Michael-in-Norfolk via e-mail and they will be promptly removed. Michael-in-Norfolk contains links to other Internet sites. These links are provided solely as a convenience and are not endorsements of any products or services in such sites, and no information or content in such site has been endorsed or approved by this blog.