Kant 's View On Duty Ethics

Kant 's View On Duty Ethics

885 WordsAug 23rd, 20144 Pages

Although everybody should respect the justice and its laws, human beings are being dependable by their personal needs, which represent feelings that need to be satisfied. These feelings are sometimes in contradiction with the morality. Giving an example, a security officer is not supposed to receive and accept any bribe for any reason but because his personal feelings translated in needs could be stronger than

his morals he could accept the bribe. This is where the Duty Ethic principles come forward and point out the necessity of respecting them. In Kant’s view, Duty Ethics are based on a set of moral rules that should be universal accepted by all people and be necessary at the same time. Ideal would be if the personal feelings and instincts that a rational human being has when he performs an act of duty were not placed before the moral law. Also, the intentions are more important than the consequences. If a person does an act of good will, which has hidden intentions or goals, then his good will act would not have any moral value. The intentions of any good will action must be focused on the beneficiary to be considered moral. In addition, a person is considered moral and his actions are moral when he does not receive any material or non-material advantages that could affect the others while he recognizes that all people are equal and have the same rights.…

Ethics, What is it? many a man have asked the same question. A dictionary describes ethics as-moral principles that govern a person 's or group 's behavior. Is there a universal ethical behavior ? Are all countries ethical ? Theses very same questions many philosophers have tried to figure through time from Socrates to Immanuel kant (and to this very day for the matter!). While comparing two great eathist Plato and Immanuel Kant I, the writer argue that Kant 's ideological views on ethics were far…

Enlightenment”, he discusses his view of enlightenment and how “reason” can be brought to the public masses. During the late 17th century, many individuals found it very difficult to break away from their self-incurred tutelage, and often faced a power struggle between one’s individual thought versus how society deems one to think. As a result, it stemmed the Age of Enlightenment, hence the motto – “dare to know, dare to be wise”. In Kant’s terms, enlightenment is humanity 's escape from “self-imposed ignorance…

Strom
Philosophy 300
Class Section 1200
Recitation-Tuesday 10am
2/11/2015
What Is The Highest Good?
Immanuel Kant and Aristotle are two of the most prominent philosophers on ethics and morals. Each has their own idea about human life and what the highest good is. It has even been said that in his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals Kant disproves Aristotle’s view. In order to prove that Kant successfully disproves Aristotle’s theory, we must first understand both theories. After a successful understanding…

Another topic that Kant contributed to is morality. According to Kant, moral laws cannot be derived from human nature. To put it in other terms, it is not human nature that should be used as a model to how we should behave morally. Kant believed that humans do not always make the right moral decisions because human nature can be flawed at times, often times choosing an animalistic desire over doing something that is morally permissible. In addition, Kant believed that the outcome of human nature…

Kant and Hobbes have completely different interpretations of morality. The vast differences between them is due to their opposing schools of thought. Kant’s view on morality is very analytical and strict. Whereas, Hobbes’ view is both provisional and tentative, depending on the outcomes. Although these differences between their philosophies were present, they both took a subjective stance in their reasoning meaning, they believed moral philosophy should be centered on the person. This essay will…

Khaled AlMarwani
Philosophical Ethics PHL270
Dr. Elizabeth F. Cooke
Question # 1: Kant’s Ethics
According to my humble reading, Kant is considered the hardest to read, grasp and understand among the philosophers that we came across studying ethics. According to Kant, nothing could be called good without qualification except a good will. And the good will is the desire or the tendency to do your duty because it is your duty, not anything else. Thus, nothing can be gained out of an action…

According to Kant, We have these absolute duties to ourselves and these duties to oneself become the supreme principle of all duties. Therefore, these supreme self-duties are the reason why moral ethics exist, and without our duties to oneself there would be no other duties, nor would we, as a species, survive at all. However, these self-regarding duties can be very contradicting, but can help us understand the bigger picture of the categorical imperative.
Kant believes that we must “act only according…

Immanuel Kant was an intelligent, well-known German philosopher during the Enlightenment era of the late 18th century. During this enthusiastic time period, there emerged a strong belief in the ability of human reason to help understand the world and solve its numerous problems- including ethical ones. Kant’s contribution to ethics has been very substantial, and although ethics is the field he’s had the most profound impact on, Kant also spent his time working in other areas, such as metaphysics…

reading Immanuel Kant’s An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? Firstly, I will state the views that I held on freedom before I read the text, framing them within a political context by labelling myself as a civil libertarian and explaining what that means. Subsequently, I will provide my interpretation of Kant’s views on freedom through the “positive” and “negative” senses and how, for Kant, that there ought to be a distinction between the “public” and “private” use of reason, as it constitutes…

has been lied to. Everyone has experienced the feelings of betrayal and vulnerability brought about by having their trust in someone broken. Lying, any reasonable person would agree, is wrong. Famous philosopher Immanuel Kant argued that, in fact, we as humans have a perfect duty to never lie in any situation. While on its surface a theory that is easy to agree with, many challenged Kant’s firm stance by challenging it with theoretical situations in which lying might be the only right thing to do…