Personal narratives of the South African collapse

Diversity cannot work. It replaces a single culture, no matter how nascent, with a compromise culture in which no standards can exist except on a permissive level. That in turn encourages resentment and parasitism and a host of other things entirely unrelated to getting necessary things done.

South Africa went down the path of collapse in the 1980s. Its government, tired of international pressure and apparently too lazy to hide its Social Darwinism behind libertarian pretense, opted for a political system that enfranchised one numerous ethnic group over the ruling caste of Europeans. That in itself leads to disaster, but this newly-enfranchised group is also not biologically ready for the complexities of civilization beyond the tribal/village level which has been their way of life for thousands of years.

As a result, the new conquerors have opted for an illogical program of extracting as much wealth as they can from the ruling caste as possible, forgetting that in doing so, they will dry up that well and be left with a real wasteland. They do not care. Their goal, like that of the elites in the West, is to be In Power. Whether that is over a sprawling wasteland of villages or a modern society, matters not to them… they will have all the conveniences they want for their personal lives, either way. The king always lives well.

A South African writer has contributed the following story of the experiences of a friend of his. He wishes to remain anonymous, of course, because internet retaliation is worse in countries without rule of law. But here is what happened and how it reflects on the “New South Africa”:

A South African commercial farmer (traditionally known as a “Boer”) owns four relatively large farms but also manages three other farms for the South African Government.

The managed farms are the subject of this story. These “other” farms are located in a State-owned tribal trust area. There are several of these trusts across the country, each of which is “allocated” to a specific tribe and in this case, the “Venda” tribe. According to the farmer the Government “took” the same land in the ‘70s from white farmers in order to consolidate an area that, having been inhabited by the Venda tribe and acknowledged as their “homeland,” serve as a form of demi-state for the Venda.

These farms were taken over by the Venda people in the form of the tribal Chief or King who would have allocated these areas/farms to specific members of his tribe, to cultivate as it were. However, despite enormous resources at the disposal of the Chief in all disciplines, all of these farms came to a standstill. The Boer farmer was tasked by the current black government with getting these farms “going” again.

The farmer installed water pumps and provided farming tools to the Venda on the managed farm. To his amazement the pumps and tools he provided were removed within a week and re-sold for money. He promptly installed a new set of pumps as they were vital to the running of the forage. As he installed these pumps, a caravan of local people drove a half-mile behind him in order to remove the same. Needless to say he did not contemplate a third installation.

At the same time, on his own farms, he had a very good relationship with his own black workforce. But three months ago something changed for the worse. His fruit trees were routinely stripped with some trees literally chopped down. When he confronted his own workers on this behavior they told him straight to his face that the farm does not belong to him anymore and that he must share it. When he shows them which trees they can use for fire wood, they ignore him and cut protected species down.

This type of intimidation has gotten worse over these three months to the extent that he closed his small businesses in town. Currently he is assessing the possibilities to also sell the farms, which is a difficult thing for a real farmer to do. His wife has been attacked at home and dragged into the bushes, which was stopped after he had arrived on the scene. On his own he is not afraid to engage these criminals, but he is afraid for his wife.

Now the farmer faces a quandary that many higher-income South Africans face: how to escape. His farming turnover exceeds $4m and the proceeds from the sale will allow him to find a “safer” place to stay, if he can find a way out of the larcenous, corrupt, third-world style society South Africa has become.

This story will be familiar to Americans from the Southern half of that country, because the large number of third world immigrants in that area has changed almost every election into a contest where the minority candidate always wins. It is the same everywhere: groups vote in self-interest, except the guilt-ridden and now degenerate ruling caste, who promptly obliterate themselves in a disgusting miasma of weeping, self-congratulatory pretense, and perversity.

18 Responses to “Personal narratives of the South African collapse”

This is an all too common story in the new SA. As a non-white South African, I can tell you that whites are almost universally hated by non-whites, especially black Africans. Some of the upper-class black urbanites pretend otherwise, or rather, tend to mask their outright hatred with derision and condescension related to Apartheid and how whites have to recompense, in perpetuity.

More interestingly, it’s difficult to tell from this short piece what your views on apartheid are, but from what I can tell, they seem to contradict your usual stance on such matters. Or maybe not. Anyway, whites started this mess with the colonization of this country so, as usual, diversity fails and those who fight the hardest for it generally tend to be the most screwed over by it. I suppose one could call that Hereditary Karmic Justice. Alack, as with most of human history, later generations tend to bear majority of the brunt of their ancestor’s actions…

Considering that North Africa had been majority Berber since the First Glaciation, Muslims were attempting to recoup numbers in the South, we discovered the entirety of the East Congo in the first place in the expedition of 1890,and few black SA’s are even Khoisan (aboriginal Africans to the area) where we fucked up was not sticking to our guns on our own best interests and allowing imbecile traitors in charge.

The Queen being complicit in coddling those damn dirty apes Mugabe and Mandela were problematic as well.

From what I understand, the land was uninhabited when the Dutch arrived. It was not until they had been there several generations that Africans even saw the Dutch settlements. The Africans are not native to that Area. The Dutch are the closest to being native.

Your understanding is incorrect. Khoisan were native to the some parts of what is now South Africa for centuries. Pretty sure Bantu blacks came down from the north, invaded and became the dominant group before the Dutch ever showed up.

I’m not saying there was anything even close to a unified civilization (lots of tribal warfare, etc). Just pointing out that this comment and others appears to be ignorant of the demographics of the land before white contact. Really, it’s similar to what existed in North America when the Europeans arrived.

I verified. The current boundaries of South Africa do encompass some lands that were inhabited at the time of Dutch arrival, but the original Dutch settlements were all in uninhabited areas. It was many generations before the Bantu encountered the Dutch in that area. The frontier wars were essentially when the settlements actually encountered any natives for the first time, but mostly it was Bantu and others expanding southwards. It was not land these blacks had ever controlled, for the most part.

Sure – my understanding is also that the Dutch didn’t need to ‘fight’ anybody to build their first settlements.

South Africa (today) is about 471,443 square miles (that’s almost double the size of Texas), and the Dutch arrived at the coast, so it’s unlikely they would have encountered any large inhabited areas.

However, and depending on what history you choose to believe, the Portuguese (Bartolomeu Dias, Vasco da Gama and co.), and later the Dutch, and others, traded with the Khoisan in what is now Cape Town well before the Dutch ever decided to settle.

So it’s not accurate to depict a land devoid of people, and Europeans showing up and magically creating a civilization, either. And we haven’t even spoken about the vast amount of slave labour (largely from Indonesia/Batavia and later, India) needed to build any of what was later built.

I don’t understand why he didn’t get out sooner. Here in the USA, when your town gets to the 30% level it’s time to leave. SA whites are 4 million among 40 million if I recall correctly. No way would I live there and would have left long ago. I think they are sitting in a time bomb as the black population is rising exponentially and they are getting hit by black migration from the north. Every problem the blacks face (which are of their own doing via overpopulation and genetics) will be blamed on the “other”.

Every problem the blacks face (which are of their own doing via overpopulation and genetics) will be blamed on the “other”.

This is the plague of diversity. One group is on top, and they are seen as the giver and everyone else the receiver. When the giver does not give enough, it is assumed that they do so out of ill-will and must be punished.

I can guess why he did not get out earlier. SA whites are betting against time. They know the new SA gov’t will not survive forever. If it collapses soon, they can go back to a libertarian state which, in the absence of anti-discrimination law, will be white-ruled. This will benefit everyone.

Interesting you see a chance that they could survive in South Africa. I never considered that. I always felt they will be slaughtered when the collapse occurs, the same way they were in Haiti or just plain kicked out like in Zimbabwe. We shall see.

That is one of the possibilities. If the new state manages to mobilize its people to fanaticism before its collapse is evident, it will achieve the genocide of whites that it clearly desires. If its failings become too blatantly clear before that time, it will have to back down and people will want the old way again, or something more like it. In the same way, Zimbabwe has invited some white farmers back to manage farms that now are not doing so well. Ultimately all things succumb to laws of supply and demand. But, as you point out, if the fanatics get their way, there is only one option they can take which is ideologically satisfying to their constituents, and that is mass murder.

We must do everything we can to prevent this from happening here to us. I would just ask aloud by what moral right does anyone have the right to interfere with another’s freedom of association in Africa or america. Whites cannot tolerate this much longer or we will be living as savages.

Good point. But I would start by no longer thinking about rights and freedoms. I would think about end results. Rights and freedoms just cloud the mind, when really what must be made are broader and clearer decisions.

[…] approaches to sex crimes, which begin with a realistic assessment of actual harm. He has some Personal narratives of the South African collapse and a provocative (and completely correct) view on Promiscuous altruism. And this was a fine, […]