MTA Releases Parking Meter Study that Proposes Extending Hours

MTA Chief Nat Ford, at a reporters’ round table today, released the long-anticipated parking study conducted by his agency to measure the traffic impacts of increasing parking meter hours on weekday evenings and on Sundays [Summary PDF] [Full Study PDF].

The study recommends that the agency extend parking meter hours in specific commercial districts on Sundays and until as late as midnight in some districts on weekdays when parking occupancy is over 85 percent or
businesses are open. This would be done on targeted commercial
corridors and would not be a blanket application across all of the more
than 25,000 metered spaces the MTA manages.

"We’ve moved away from a blunt instrument to something that is much sharper and based in data that is pretty straight forward," said Ford, referring to a previous proposal to extend meter hours to 8 pm citywide.

MTA CFO Sonali Bose explained the details of the study, which compiled numerous customer intercept surveys, business interviews, and massive data gathering at meters across the city. Bose said
that San Francisco parking policies haven’t been significantly updated
for decades and many of the meter hours are based on a time when fewer
businesses in the city were open late on weeknights or on
Sundays.

One of the more interesting findings in the study was that the vast majority of people don’t drive to shop. Intercept surveys found data consistent with previous San Francisco County Transportation Authority (TA) studies that roughly three quarters of shoppers walk, take transit, or ride a bike to do their shopping. Further, for businesses that are worried increasing meter rates would drive away customers, the study notes that increased turnover is good for business. For instance, extending parking meter hours would allow 12 cars to park in one space, instead of seven, a 71 percent increase in potential customers.

When and how the study’s proposals will be implemented is not certain. In response to a question about the timeline for rolling the study out, Ford said there was none.

"Right now, the only timeline we can truly bank on is October 20th, presenting this at the MTA Board," said Ford. "Based on what we get back, both formally and informally in terms of support or opposition, then we’ll start building a schedule in terms of implementation. Or maybe this is a discussion and implementation is something that is discussed more earnestly in terms of next year’s budget."

Although Ford and Bose tried to explain the MTA’s parking study is different from the situation in Oakland because it is based on hard data and good parking policy, and because increased revenue would support transit, Oakland parallels were ubiquitous.

"I hope that the MTA leadership has taken heed of what happened in Oakland and will think twice about extending meter hours in this recessionary time," said Ken Cleaveland, spokesperson for the Building Owners and Management Association (BOMA). "Let’s delay that conversation for a later date."

MTA Board Chairman Tom Nolan countered that Oakland and San Francisco should not be equated. "I think everyone is taken aback by the strong and effective rebellion in Oakland. But this is a transit-first city," said Nolan, who reiterated the dire financial situation the MTA faces with the budget deficit, which he estimated at $30 million.

When pressed whether the MTA Board would stand up to Mayor Gavin Newsom if it believed extending meter hours was better for the MTA and the city, Nolan admitted the board hadn’t opposed the mayor "really in much of anything." But, he added, "We keep turning down revenue options, if it’s not going to be on the revenue side, it’s going to be on the service side."

Supervisor John Avalos was concerned that Mayor Newsom was more concerned with bad publicity than with balancing the MTA budget. " I believe the mayor’s office is not thinking about what’s best for the
city and trying to ward off possible outcry that could result from
people opposed to the changes."

He added, "I think [the MTA] came forward with this despite the pressure because they
have a huge hole to fill. They have a growing budget deficit that they need to move on. To not do that would be irresponsible."

Vowing to push the MTA to action if the Mayor and Board President David Chiu did not, Avalos said, "I will do what I did last May, trying to push for the MTA to be funded by different funding streams, including reducing subsidies for drivers."

The MTA proposal would increase meter hours at all metered spaces from 11 am – 6 pm on Sundays. In addition, the following areas would have these specific changes:

3rd Street in Bayview would add Sundays, but evening hours would end at 6 pm, as they do currently

Parts of the Financial district and parts of Mission Street in the Excelsior, West Portal, Taraval, Irving, Balboa, and parts of Geary and Clement in the Inner Richmond would add Sundays, with evening hours until 6 pm Monday through Thursday and 9 pm Friday and Saturday

Most of SoMa, Hayes Valley, Civic Center, Parts of Chinatown, Union Street, and parts of Geary and Clement in the Outer Richmond would add Sundays, with evening hours until 9 pm Monday through Thursday and midnight Friday and Saturday

Inner Mission and Valencia Streets, Upper Market Street, parts of Castro, Inner Geary, parts of Chinatown, Columbus Avenue, and parts of Fisherman’s Wharf not operated by the Port would add Sundays, with evening hours until midnight Monday through Saturday

The MTA proposal also suggests changing other parking policies to complement the increased meter hours, including:

While I would prefer that this happened on its own and not as a result of Muni budget deficits, I’ll take it. This is a win for drivers, merchants and residents. Let’s hope that we can actually get this done.

Thanks to Streetsblog for making sure that the study was publicized. It sounds like the Mayor tried to bury it as noted last week.

Great work MTA… the recommendations seem to agree with what I observe. Mission, TenderNob, North Beach, and the Warf all need increased hours of enforcement. Impossible to find parking at late hours… lost revenue opportunities for the MTA.

Is there any talk of increasing rates in high demand neighborhoods? Street parking should be market rate… otherwise it’s inefficient.

An additional benefit: Taking away the expectation of free parking will send the right signal to potential drivers to opt for transit or other means.

Mr. Newsome, uh oh… Draw a line in the sand – is Newsome still our mayor or is he too worried about socal votes?

Also, I hope that the Board can make a stand and not fold like Oakland. This is best for the city and for business, no matter what those on SFgate lead you to believe.

JK

Can Streetsblog explain how these recommendations work with the SFpark program? You don’t mention SFpark in the article, but that covers about 6,500 metered spots with real time parking sensors. A quick glance at the map appears to show at least some overlap.

james

Ridiculous. Yet another cash grab, pure and simple. How exactly is this proposal supposed to increase the availability of parking when many people go out for 3+ hours in the evening – ie. for dinner, then to the theatre, clubs, etc – and have no intention of moving their vehicles during this time period. It’s a tax on nightlife and entertainment and the proposed benefits aside from revenue generation are purely utopian. Extending BART and MUNI lines until 3AM would stop the flow of cars from the residential districts of SF and the East Bay and would have a far greater impact than anything else. “Transit first” policies are great for cities that have world-class transit systems, such as New York, London, Paris and Berlin. San Francisco does not have anywhere near the infrastructure required to make this claim.

Scott Fenton

Increasing parking rates and metering on Sundays are idiotic ideas. If you want to emulate Portland and get people to use mass transit and bicycles, make the mass transit system less of a joke and make cycling in the city less deadly. This is the kind of crap that causes Tea Party lunacy. Just keep raising parking meters to $6 an hour and on Sundays. Make going to church a $17 ordeal and push people to shop out of town and visit on the weekends elsewhere. Believe it or not, there are a lot of other choices. Higher meter fees propel the rates up for public garages, reduce retail, and again, push people out of town. They also make SF less livable. You people do not seem to get it. No one can live and run a business in this city relying on the bus system. It’s a disaster, even after decimating traffic on Geary the buses ride in flotillas as much as ever. You still see bus drivers stop full buses in the middle of the day to get lunch at a deli; no other major city permits that kind of crap. You have just raised the cost of a bus trip by 33% when more people than ever are out of work or facing lower salaries. Stop trying to soak people in their cars; make your public transportation a viable and desirable alternative. Then people will come. All you’re doing now is promoting disgust and discontent amongst residents and tourists alike.

Caity

What he (Scott Fenton) said… Also, as a result of the latest MUNI service CUTS, it appears that many small businesses in the Outer Clement Street area are folding or, at least, seriously hurting.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Flickr photo: KayVee.INC Mayor Gavin Newsom has been quietly pressuring MTA Chief Nat Ford to delay or prevent proposals to extend parking meter hours on weeknights and Sundays, despite a looming mid-year MTA budget deficit and studies that show it’s good policy, Streetsblog has learned. A study on the parking management and revenue implications of […]

On Clement Street in the Inner Richmond, dusk doesn’t bring an end to the search for parking. Flickr photo: bigteetoe The recommendations in the MTA’s new parking study, which Streetsblog reported on yesterday, are designed to make it easier for customers to find a place to park when they visit businesses on evenings and Sundays. […]

Click to view full PDF. MTA staff is proposing various ballot initiatives to bring in new revenue. Image courtesy SFMTA. Facing deficits of $56.4 million and $45 million in the next two fiscal years, the MTA will present ideas today to close yet another budget gap, including extending parking meter hours, eliminating transfers and cutting […]

It shouldn’t be too surprising to those who have followed the debate on extending parking meter hours that Supervisor Carmen Chu is not a big fan. A tipster forwarded us an email from Chu’s office sent out last night to constituents encouraging them to show up at today’s MTA Board meeting and give their opinion […]

Photo:Michael Ronquillo The kerfuffle continues to intensify over the draft study the MTA recently completed on extending parking meter hours in commercial districts around the city, a study which, as we first reported last Friday, the Mayor doesn’t want MTA Chief Nat Ford to broadcast too loudly. When Newsom was asked about our story […]

It shouldn’t come as a surprise to those of you who didn’t watch the San Francisco MTA Board meeting yesterday on your live-feed or on SFGTV that the meeting devolved into a referendum on the merits of free, or nearly free, parking. With half a dozen television cameras lined up along the far side of […]