Comments

The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.

The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.grandconjuration

The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.

Score: 70

Bart_simpsonDoh
9:43am Fri 10 Jan 14

Typical cyclists, thinking that warnings and the law do not apply to them.

Typical cyclists, thinking that warnings and the law do not apply to them.Bart_simpsonDoh

Typical cyclists, thinking that warnings and the law do not apply to them.

Score: -200

Floflo
9:55am Fri 10 Jan 14

Bart_simpsonDoh wrote…

Typical cyclists, thinking that warnings and the law do not apply to them.

Is there any particular law you are referring to?

[quote][p][bold]Bart_simpsonDoh[/bold] wrote:
Typical cyclists, thinking that warnings and the law do not apply to them.[/p][/quote]Is there any particular law you are referring to?Floflo

Bart_simpsonDoh wrote…

Typical cyclists, thinking that warnings and the law do not apply to them.

Is there any particular law you are referring to?

Score: 104

grandconjuration
11:04am Fri 10 Jan 14

Is it against the law or dangerous to walk through water that is about 12 inches deep whilst wearing Wellington boots?

Are the police really alarmed about this? Or, is it just a pitiful attempt for the OM publish yet another article with an anti-cyclist agenda.

Get a grip.

Is it against the law or dangerous to walk through water that is about 12 inches deep whilst wearing Wellington boots?
Are the police really alarmed about this? Or, is it just a pitiful attempt for the OM publish yet another article with an anti-cyclist agenda.
Get a grip.grandconjuration

Is it against the law or dangerous to walk through water that is about 12 inches deep whilst wearing Wellington boots?

Are the police really alarmed about this? Or, is it just a pitiful attempt for the OM publish yet another article with an anti-cyclist agenda.

Get a grip.

Score: 38

Neonlights
11:20am Fri 10 Jan 14

Do those 2 people 'really' look at risk. I've seen deeper duck ponds than what they're trying to cross.

Talk about over dramatising something. Is the OM trying to go the same way as the Daily Mail?

Do those 2 people 'really' look at risk. I've seen deeper duck ponds than what they're trying to cross.
Talk about over dramatising something. Is the OM trying to go the same way as the Daily Mail?Neonlights

Do those 2 people 'really' look at risk. I've seen deeper duck ponds than what they're trying to cross.

Talk about over dramatising something. Is the OM trying to go the same way as the Daily Mail?

Score: 173

grandconjuration
11:24am Fri 10 Jan 14

Bart_simpsonDoh wrote…

Typical cyclists, thinking that warnings and the law do not apply to them.

Why does any article with the word 'cyclists' in attract idiotic comments from muppets like you?

I note that you've not left any comments on a recent report describing the conviction of drink drivers.

http://www.oxfordmai
l.co.uk/news/1092248
9.The_Scales_of_Just
ice/

[quote][p][bold]Bart_simpsonDoh[/bold] wrote:
Typical cyclists, thinking that warnings and the law do not apply to them.[/p][/quote]Why does any article with the word 'cyclists' in attract idiotic comments from muppets like you?
I note that you've not left any comments on a recent report describing the conviction of drink drivers.
http://www.oxfordmai
l.co.uk/news/1092248
9.The_Scales_of_Just
ice/grandconjuration

Bart_simpsonDoh wrote…

Typical cyclists, thinking that warnings and the law do not apply to them.

Why does any article with the word 'cyclists' in attract idiotic comments from muppets like you?

I note that you've not left any comments on a recent report describing the conviction of drink drivers.

http://www.oxfordmai
l.co.uk/news/1092248
9.The_Scales_of_Just
ice/

Score: 63

Bart_simpsonDoh
1:50pm Fri 10 Jan 14

The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................

The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................Bart_simpsonDoh

The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................

Score: -196

Arnold.Brewer
3:07pm Fri 10 Jan 14

I see no danger from this photo - in fact cycled through there only the other week when it was ankle deep. Regrettable though it is that someone died at this point, think sensibly if we were to stop all activity where someone died?? we wouldn't get far would we??

I see no danger from this photo - in fact cycled through there only the other week when it was ankle deep. Regrettable though it is that someone died at this point, think sensibly if we were to stop all activity where someone died?? we wouldn't get far would we??Arnold.Brewer

I see no danger from this photo - in fact cycled through there only the other week when it was ankle deep. Regrettable though it is that someone died at this point, think sensibly if we were to stop all activity where someone died?? we wouldn't get far would we??

Score: -81

seamusl
6:17pm Fri 10 Jan 14

Bart_simpsonDoh wrote…

The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................

How many red lights are there here, and I cannot see any riding going on let alone on pavements, knock it off and please stop getting so wound up, maybe a visit to The Warneford to find a cause for your phobia with regard to cyclists.

[quote][p][bold]Bart_simpsonDoh[/bold] wrote:
The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................[/p][/quote]How many red lights are there here, and I cannot see any riding going on let alone on pavements, knock it off and please stop getting so wound up, maybe a visit to The Warneford to find a cause for your phobia with regard to cyclists.seamusl

Bart_simpsonDoh wrote…

The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................

How many red lights are there here, and I cannot see any riding going on let alone on pavements, knock it off and please stop getting so wound up, maybe a visit to The Warneford to find a cause for your phobia with regard to cyclists.

Score: 60

Floflo
7:25pm Fri 10 Jan 14

Bart_simpsonDoh wrote…

The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................

Your quite the obsessive aren't you Bart! A story about floods and cycling comes along and you immediately drone on about red lights and one way streets.

Why don't you start cycling as an outlet for your pent up frustrations?

[quote][p][bold]Bart_simpsonDoh[/bold] wrote:
The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................[/p][/quote]Your quite the obsessive aren't you Bart! A story about floods and cycling comes along and you immediately drone on about red lights and one way streets.
Why don't you start cycling as an outlet for your pent up frustrations?Floflo

Bart_simpsonDoh wrote…

The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................

Your quite the obsessive aren't you Bart! A story about floods and cycling comes along and you immediately drone on about red lights and one way streets.

Why don't you start cycling as an outlet for your pent up frustrations?

Score: 58

Sophia
8:48pm Fri 10 Jan 14

Someone died there Wednesday, folk are grieving. Leave off these silly arguments for now

Someone died there Wednesday, folk are grieving. Leave off these silly arguments for nowSophia

Someone died there Wednesday, folk are grieving. Leave off these silly arguments for now

Score: -53

livid99
11:07am Thu 16 Jan 14

Bart_simpsonDoh wrote…

The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................

All true, and it looks like the alert has gone out to oxford cyclists to hammer the thumbs down button for anyone who dares to make a negative comment again......

[quote][p][bold]Bart_simpsonDoh[/bold] wrote:
The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................[/p][/quote]All true, and it looks like the alert has gone out to oxford cyclists to hammer the thumbs down button for anyone who dares to make a negative comment again......livid99

Bart_simpsonDoh wrote…

The Laws.....Going through red lights, one streets the wrong way, cycling on pavements, no lights, .................

All true, and it looks like the alert has gone out to oxford cyclists to hammer the thumbs down button for anyone who dares to make a negative comment again......

Score: -119

livid99
11:09am Thu 16 Jan 14

grandconjuration wrote…

The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.

Oh fear......Anything to deflect criticism of cyclists.

[quote][p][bold]grandconjuration[/bold] wrote:
The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.[/p][/quote]Oh fear......Anything to deflect criticism of cyclists.livid99

grandconjuration wrote…

The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.

Oh fear......Anything to deflect criticism of cyclists.

Score: 51

Dan - Eynsham
6:05pm Thu 16 Jan 14

Livid 99. The law says that someone pushing a bicycle is a pedestrian. That is why you are allowed to push your bicycle while walking along a pavement. It is incidentally why you can push your pushchair on a pavement too.

I am sorry that the mere mention or picture of a bicycle sends you and BartS into paroxysms of disgust. .

Livid 99. The law says that someone pushing a bicycle is a pedestrian. That is why you are allowed to push your bicycle while walking along a pavement. It is incidentally why you can push your pushchair on a pavement too.
I am sorry that the mere mention or picture of a bicycle sends you and BartS into paroxysms of disgust. .Dan - Eynsham

Livid 99. The law says that someone pushing a bicycle is a pedestrian. That is why you are allowed to push your bicycle while walking along a pavement. It is incidentally why you can push your pushchair on a pavement too.

I am sorry that the mere mention or picture of a bicycle sends you and BartS into paroxysms of disgust. .

Score: 41

Fantomas
10:51pm Thu 16 Jan 14

livid99 wrote…

grandconjuration wrote…

The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.

Oh fear......Anything to deflect criticism of cyclists.

You took a few days to respond to this story. What happened? Did you lose your head dobber?

[quote][p][bold]livid99[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]grandconjuration[/bold] wrote:
The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.[/p][/quote]Oh fear......Anything to deflect criticism of cyclists.[/p][/quote]You took a few days to respond to this story. What happened? Did you lose your head dobber?Fantomas

livid99 wrote…

grandconjuration wrote…

The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.

Oh fear......Anything to deflect criticism of cyclists.

You took a few days to respond to this story. What happened? Did you lose your head dobber?

Score: 39

livid99
2:57pm Fri 17 Jan 14

Dan - Eynsham wrote…

Livid 99. The law says that someone pushing a bicycle is a pedestrian. That is why you are allowed to push your bicycle while walking along a pavement. It is incidentally why you can push your pushchair on a pavement too.

I am sorry that the mere mention or picture of a bicycle sends you and BartS into paroxysms of disgust. .

Yes PUSHING your bicycle along the pavement. But this is not what many cyclists do is it ?.....they ride on the pavement, often at speed, and expect pedestrians to get out of their way, and then get all p*ssed off and defensive when someone dares to criticise them.

[quote][p][bold]Dan - Eynsham[/bold] wrote:
Livid 99. The law says that someone pushing a bicycle is a pedestrian. That is why you are allowed to push your bicycle while walking along a pavement. It is incidentally why you can push your pushchair on a pavement too.
I am sorry that the mere mention or picture of a bicycle sends you and BartS into paroxysms of disgust. .[/p][/quote]Yes PUSHING your bicycle along the pavement. But this is not what many cyclists do is it ?.....they ride on the pavement, often at speed, and expect pedestrians to get out of their way, and then get all p*ssed off and defensive when someone dares to criticise them.livid99

Dan - Eynsham wrote…

Livid 99. The law says that someone pushing a bicycle is a pedestrian. That is why you are allowed to push your bicycle while walking along a pavement. It is incidentally why you can push your pushchair on a pavement too.

I am sorry that the mere mention or picture of a bicycle sends you and BartS into paroxysms of disgust. .

Yes PUSHING your bicycle along the pavement. But this is not what many cyclists do is it ?.....they ride on the pavement, often at speed, and expect pedestrians to get out of their way, and then get all p*ssed off and defensive when someone dares to criticise them.

Score: 285

livid99
2:59pm Fri 17 Jan 14

Fantomas wrote…

livid99 wrote…

grandconjuration wrote…

The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.

Oh fear......Anything to deflect criticism of cyclists.

You took a few days to respond to this story. What happened? Did you lose your head dobber?

Better things to do, matey...

[quote][p][bold]Fantomas[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]livid99[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]grandconjuration[/bold] wrote:
The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.[/p][/quote]Oh fear......Anything to deflect criticism of cyclists.[/p][/quote]You took a few days to respond to this story. What happened? Did you lose your head dobber?[/p][/quote]Better things to do, matey...livid99

Fantomas wrote…

livid99 wrote…

grandconjuration wrote…

The two people picture are walking with bicycles. Hence, they are pedestrians and not cyclists.

Oh fear......Anything to deflect criticism of cyclists.

You took a few days to respond to this story. What happened? Did you lose your head dobber?

Ipsoregulated

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here