On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Shelley Powers wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
> wrote:
>> On 04/06/2010 05:10 PM, Shelley Powers wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not going to formally object to this interesting segue in the
>>> procedure, but I believe that anyone that writes one counter to
>>> all is
>>> doing so with the assumption that the co-chairs and group have
>>> already
>>> made a decision regardless of the strengths of the argument. This
>>> assumption is more likely trigger me to file a Formal Objection if
>>> my
>>> changes are rejected.
>>
>> Issues 1 and 2 were decided together.
>>
>
> Same counter-proposal? There's been so many lately, I can't remember
> what was what.
>
> Never mind, I just wasn't aware that we did have a precedent in this
> regard.
Same Change Proposal for both, and there never was a counter-proposal,
we adopted the proposal that was submitted.
Regards,
Maciej