Meaning: 1. A document written on a sheet or paper or parchment that has been used before, the earlier writing either scraped off or though, perhaps, still partially visible. 2. Anything with more than one layer or aspect beneath its surface, anything multilayered.

Notes: The British and Americans cannot agree on the pronunciation of this word. In Britain it is pronounced [pah-li(m)p-sest] while the Yanks pronounce it [pæ-lim(p)-sest]. It is difficult to hear the [p] because it is so similar to the [m]—pronounce them yourselves and notice how both are bilabial, involving both lips. The adjective is palimpsestic [pæ-lim(p)-'ses-tik].

In Play: Today's good word effortlessly settles into the description of any work of art: "The Little Prince is much more than a children's story; it is a palimpsest of the author's affairs, stormy marriage, and perhaps even a covert suicide note." Places or people whose history shows through a modern facade beg for it: "New York is a palimpsest of all the cultures that passed through Ellis Island in by-gone years."

Word History: Today's good word goes back through Latin palimpsestus to Greek palimpsestos "scraped again". This compound contains palin "again" + psen "to rub or scrape." Greek palin derives from Proto-Indo-European *kwel-/kwol "turn", the same root underlying Latin collum "neck" and English "collar". "Psen" is akin to Sanskrit psati "eat" and Russian pisat' "write", both specialized types of scraping. (It doesn't take much effort to scrape together and expression of our gratitude to our distinguished friend, Lyn Laboriel, for alerting us to the beauty and depth of today's Good Word.)

A very good example is the humble jalapeño chile, which is often misspelled without the tilde. In which case, and one does hear this often, it looks like "jalapeno." Most speakers are OK with replacing the Spanish "jota" with a smooth "h" sound of English, but I hate it when people say "halapeeno" pepper, totally ignoring the absence of the ~.

It seems to me that most definitions of "diacritics" include the top parts of Swedish å, ä, ö, and they are often referred to in English as "accented letters".

That may be appropriate and helpful in some sorting algorithms (in German, ä and ö are sorted as a and o, respectively). But my native feeling is that they are letters in their own right, in the same way as an E isn't an F with an added _ diacritic.

An argument against my stance comes from history. The dots were originally a small superscript e, and the ring was a superscript a. Even today, aa, ae, oe are used for å, ä, ö, especially for capitals and/or in established proper names, like the Danish poet Adam Oehlenschläger, the Danish schnapps Aalborg akvavit and tons of others.