now he is saying he is ending the war in Afghanistan the same thing he said two years ago, and talk about pulling the troops out, which again he started it two years ago but now saying he wants to do it.

Are you upset that he's ending the war or upset that hasn't tried to end it until now?

Originally Posted by Yuuichi

In Wisconsin and looks like Illinois military votes overseas will not be counted because they sent them out late, two states Obama won.

One can never get used to an unknown quantity like uncle Joe.... he seems like the kind of guy that can just snap and lose it at any given moment. At least as the VP, we are fairly sheltered from him, but there's no telling what would happen if Obama were to let him off his leash.

Bullocks..Biden may say some off the wall stuff now and then but the guy is a solid VP. People tend to forget that Obama isn't running the country by himself. This guy is a very experienced with over 20 years of service and Obama chose the right guy. Or do you think he should of chosen someone like John Edwards?

Inexperienced people like Palin and Ryan as VP are much more scarier IMO.

Are you upset that he's ending the war or upset that hasn't tried to end it until now?

I wouldn't say that's his fault.

That he hasn't until now, but he said he did two years ago so which is it? The spending can be cut in many many MANY other programs. Like why are my tax dollars paying for some girl to get an abortion? especially when it is multiple times?

The amount of abortions will stay the same regardless if it's illegal or legal. There is no significant statistical difference.

So yes, you won't pay taxes for it if it's illegal, but abortions via the black market or the woman herself would mean endangering the health of women. The countries with the least amount of abortions of the ones where abortion is legal and proper contraception education is provided.

With a military that spends more than the next 10 countries combined, I think that's certainly an area that could use significant cuts.

The amount of abortions will stay the same regardless if it's illegal or legal. There is no significant statistical difference.

So yes, you won't pay taxes for it if it's illegal, but abortions via the black market or the woman herself would mean endangering the health of women.

With a military that spends more than the next 10 countries combined, I think that's certainly an area that could use significant cuts.

Your misunderstanding my abortion stance. No way do I think it should be illegal because that will be harmful as people will take it into their own hands. But I think for things like planned parents hood, if the person wants an abortion they have to pay for it themselves. There is a person who has had 8 abortions in my local planned parent hood place. They should make abortions have an easy payment plan to fit anyone budget(because I fig the issue of price and people then doing it illegally will come up).

Your misunderstanding my abortion stance. No way do I think it should be illegal because that will be harmful as people will take it into their own hands. But I think for things like planned parents hood, if the person wants an abortion they have to pay for it themselves. There is a person who has had 8 abortions in my local planned parent hood place. They should make abortions have an easy payment plan to fit anyone budget(because I fig the issue of price and people then doing it illegally will come up).

I see what you're saying. I'd have to look into Planned Parenthood more. My girlfriend swears by Planned Parenthood as something that needs to stay. She's a hardcore Obama supporter. lol

I don't think Planned Parenthood is ever going away. Crazy talk like that and about things like rape are reasons why the republicans will continue to lose ground and lose elections.

I think in these time we need planned parenthood more than ever in the US(with the pop growing rapidly). Just the public funds for abortion is something I do not agree with.

Also there was something here in FL for a vote to stop the public fund and make it so minors need parental consent to get an abortion. It failed but I am more shocked minors do not need parental consent for abortion. But that's all an entire thing for another thread.

Minors don't need parental consent because that would violate the Dr patient confidentiality. It could get pretty tough for a young girl if she had to tell her parents that not only was she having sex, it was unprotected and now she's pregnant. Especially if she was from a family that held very strong beliefs about that subject or was a member of a more extreme sect of a religion.

Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

"Remember that you are an Englishman, and have consequently won first prize in the lottery of life"

Originally Posted by dc89

If this makes time travel possible I'll go forward in time voluntarily to get my hands on CoD34 and Final Fantasy Versus XIII. They come out in the same year.

Originally Posted by Seahawkk

I dont think i could take a dick, 1. im not gay and 2 one time i stuck my finger in my butt to see how it felt and i wasn't very pleased with the experience

I have stated on more than one occasion that Paul's biggest problem is the republican party. You were just caught up in all the Ron Paulness to notice.You don't have to believe it but it's true. As far as as Democrats disregarding him. Can you blame them. The guy was never a threat to them because of the reason I gave already.(they knew he would never get anywhere because he wasn't extreme enough)

You just don't get it. Not only that but you're STILL being WILLFULLY IGNORANT. Paul's problem isn't so much the party but it's leaders. He was THE threat to the establishment. His policies would have rendered both GOP and Democrats powerless. I $#@! you not. He wasn't disregarded because he wasn't a threat. He was disregarded because he was THE threat. Your failure to not acknowledge him and his policies is proof that you're willfully ignorant. Let me ask you some questions and do try and be honest about your answers as you are now officially on notice of losing all your credibility on these forums.

What segment of the population does a non-interventionist policy hurt the most?
What segment of the population does a minimally regulated economy hurt the most?
What segment of the population does a minimally maintained government hurt the most?
What segment of the population does the abolition of the FED hurt the most?
What segment of the population does the abolition of the IRS hurt the most?
What segment of the population does the repeal of the Patriot Act, NDAA, (National Defense Authorization Act) CISPA, (Cyber Intelligence Security & Protection Act) ACA, (Affordable Care Act) Homeland Security, Education Department, Commerce Department, EPA, (Environmental Protection Agency) and the list goes on hurt the most?

I know why paul didn't get elected and never will. You need to get over the fact that not enough people care. You see how that Paul thread you created turned out right? Its time for you to get over it.

Honestly. When you post garbage like this, it only serves to give credence of your partisanship. Ad-hominem attacks and red herrings don't work with me so please, for the sanity of everyone else in this thread, quit posting tripe.

Minors don't need parental consent because that would violate the Dr patient confidentiality. It could get pretty tough for a young girl if she had to tell her parents that not only was she having sex, it was unprotected and now she's pregnant. Especially if she was from a family that held very strong beliefs about that subject or was a member of a more extreme sect of a religion.

Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

But don't they need parents permission to go on birth control before the legal age?

Your misunderstanding my abortion stance. No way do I think it should be illegal because that will be harmful as people will take it into their own hands. But I think for things like planned parents hood, if the person wants an abortion they have to pay for it themselves. There is a person who has had 8 abortions in my local planned parent hood place. They should make abortions have an easy payment plan to fit anyone budget(because I fig the issue of price and people then doing it illegally will come up).

There will always be a few people who abuse the system improperly. But on the whole PP provides a lot more than a place a baby roto-rooterd out.

The only way to lessen things like this is to educate people, just like anything else. They try to do that...hence the name of the place.

You just don't get it. Not only that but you're STILL being WILLFULLY IGNORANT. Paul's problem isn't so much the party but it's leaders. He was THE threat to the establishment. His policies would have rendered both GOP and Democrats powerless. I $#@! you not. He wasn't disregarded because he wasn't a threat. He was disregarded because he was THE threat. Your failure to not acknowledge him and his policies is proof that you're willfully ignorant. Let me ask you some questions and do try and be honest about your answers as you are now officially on notice of losing all your credibility on these forums.

What segment of the population does a non-interventionist policy hurt the most?
What segment of the population does a minimally regulated economy hurt the most?
What segment of the population does a minimally maintained government hurt the most?
What segment of the population does the abolition of the FED hurt the most?
What segment of the population does the abolition of the IRS hurt the most?
What segment of the population does the repeal of the Patriot Act, NDAA, (National Defense Authorization Act) CISPA, (Cyber Intelligence Security & Protection Act) ACA, (Affordable Care Act) Homeland Security, Education Department, Commerce Department, EPA, (Environmental Protection Agency) and the list goes on hurt the most?

Honestly. When you post garbage like this, it only serves to give credence of your partisanship. Ad-hominem attacks and red herrings don't work with me so please, for the sanity of everyone else in this thread, quit posting tripe.

Dude, Ron Paul is intelligent but still a little kooky. Even his own party see him that way. The guy is just not electable. He can say one thing and make sense, then turn around and say some weird $#@!. He would never stand a chance in a general election. If Obama clobbered an intelligent electable guy like Romney just imagine what he would do to a candidate like Paul.....that's if he can ever convince republicans he can lead the party. I don't see it happening. I know supporters of his hate that reality, but there is no way our nation will select him to man our highest post.

Dude, Ron Paul is intelligent but still a little kooky. Even his own party see him that way. The guy is just not electable. He can say one thing and make sense, then turn around and say some weird $#@!. He would never stand a chance in a general election. If Obama clobbered an intelligent electable guy like Romney just imagine what he would do to a candidate like Paul.....that's if he can ever convince republicans he can lead the party. I don't see it happening. I know supporters of his hate that reality, but there is no way our nation will select him to man our highest post.

Actually last night it was on the bottom of the last page but tonight its at the top. I guess I didn't need to do that as it ended up in the perfect position somehow.

Originally Posted by weskurtz81

What's scares me the most is Biden is next in line if anything were to happen to Obama. I don't agree with a number of Obama's policies, but Biden is a loon!

I agree, Joe Biden is even more scary but there is suspicion that he was behind the unlawful take down of Megaupload.com which would make him an enemy of freedom and rights. If true he would be an enemy of mine because such affects me as well.

Originally Posted by Morganator

So... no refutations? No rebuttals? No intelligible response?

K. Suit yourself.

That's not surprising, he didn't refute any of my points in my massive post earlier in this thread, he just said we're not headed for destruction and left it at that. Just saying it doesn't make it true. The post about Ron Paul was still the mainline response, saying his own party doesn't agree with him and therefore will never be elected...this is because the party is controlled by boys who are carrying out the opposite of what Ron wants to do. The only reason why Ron Paul is under the Republican banner is because the US is entangled with a two party system without exception and Ron Paul wouldn't get anywhere otherwise.

If Obama clobbered an intelligent electable guy like Romney just imagine what he would do to a candidate like Paul.....that's if he can ever convince republicans he can lead the party.

You can't seriously believe this? Romney being an intelligent electable guy but Ron Paul either on par or less? If George Washington or Abe Lincoln were running today they wouldn't have a ghost of a chance because they're not robots like Romney. This is why the United States is in extreme trouble.

Originally Posted by Sub-stance1

Paul is a rebuttal. Not my fault you can't comprehend what i said.

Something I have said many times but he refuses to acknowledge it.

We can comprehend it, it just doesn't have any substance (the questions that were brought up weren't answered). We all know the GOP will never nominate him because he is actually a great candidate, but if the people stop being zombies for once and refuse the establishment's garbage, that would change. It goes along with the phrase, its the system stupid! Just disregard this if your in agreement as I can't tell what the argument is about since you seem to show a little of both sides here.

Final Fantasy IX is without question not only the best video game ever made, but the best entertainment created by mankind.

Posting Permissions

PlayStation Universe

Copyright 2006-2014 7578768 Canada Inc. All Right Reserved.

Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written
permission of Abstract Holdings International Ltd. prohibited.Use of this site is governed
by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.