Japan to Re-Launch Security Council Bid

by Thalif Deen

UNITED NATIONS - Having been cold-shouldered by the international community
for more than a decade over its claims for a permanent seat on the 15-member
UN Security Council, Japan is expected
to launch an aggressive campaign to re-ignite its long-standing demand for an
expansion of the Organization's most powerful political body.

"The composition of the Security
Council should reflect the geopolitical reality of the 21st century,"
the Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations said in a five-page report
released Monday.

Although membership of the United Nations has increased from 45, at inception
in 1945, to 191 today, the Security Council has been expanded only once: from
11 to 15 members in the 1960s.

"The majority of UN member states supports expansion of the Security Council
both in permanent and non-permanent membership," the report said.

During the September 2000 UN Millennium Summit in New York, 98 countries made
explicit statements supporting the expansion of both categories of members in
the Council, it added.

The current membership includes the five veto-wielding permanent members 
the United States, France, Britain, China and Russia  and 10 non-permanent
members who are elected for two-year terms on a geographical rotation.

The four strong contenders for permanent seats  Japan, Germany, India and
Brazil  are expected to make a joint statement later this week appealing to
the international community for reform and expansion of the Security Council.

In his address to the General Assembly this week, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro
Koizumi will make a strong case for his country's bid for a permanent seat.

An increasingly large number of developing nations, most of them recipients
of Japanese development aid, are also due to publicly support Japan, when their
heads of state address the General Assembly during the two-week plenary sessions
ending Oct. 1.

A UN committee has spent over 10 years discussing "equitable representation"
in an expanded Security Council, but has made little or no headway. While none
of the five permanent members of the Council openly opposes an expansion, neither
have they seemed eager to share power with any of the contenders.

Conscious of the fact that there is strength in numbers, the Japanese government
has joined hands with the other three candidates, namely Germany, Brazil and
India, to bolster its claims.

As industrial nations and major economic powers, Japan and Germany have strong
claims for permanent seats in the Council. But while Germany's claims have been
challenged by Italy, Japan has had no serious opposition, except mild rebukes
from North Korea.

Of the three geographical regions in the developing world  Asia, Africa and
Latin America and the Caribbean  only Africa has failed to come up with a
consensus candidate.

Besides Brazil, two other Latin American countries, Argentina and Mexico, have
also indicated their interest in permanent seats. But Brazil has bulldozed
its way to the top of the list because it wields more political and economic
clout than the other two.

In Africa, there are three strong contenders: South Africa, Nigeria and Egypt.
And the continent remains split over the three competing claims. India, on the
other hand, has had little or no opposition in the Asian region.

The final decision on the expansion of the Council, however, has to be taken
both by the Security Council and the 191-member General Assembly.

Phyllis Bennis of the Washington-based Institute for Policy Studies told IPS
that real Council reform will require ending, not expanding, the perquisites
of permanent membership and the veto.

"Until that happens, if simple expansion of the Council's veto-holders
is aimed at broadening its representation, that goal can only be accomplished
through bringing on board important regional powers from the global South 
countries such as South Africa, Brazil, or India," said Bennis, the author
of over 14 books, including Calling the Shots: How Washington Dominates Today's
UN and Global Dreams.

She said that "it does not appear that real Council reform is on anyone's
agenda in the current environment of such unbalanced global power relations."

In the meantime, she said, democratization of the United Nations can more immediately
be addressed through re-empowerment of the General Assembly, "the most
democratic (however chaotic) organ of the UN system."

A Japanese foreign ministry spokesman told IPS that despite Japan's increasing
contributions to the UN's regular and peacekeeping budgets, it has been virtually
shut out of the political decision-making process. "There should be no
taxation without representation," he said.

While the United States, the largest single contributor, pays 22 percent of
the UN's regular budget, Japan is the second largest contributor accounting
for 19.5 percent.

However, the total contributions by the other four permanent members of the
Council  France (6.5 percent), Britain (5.5 percent), China (1.5 percent)
and Russia (1.2 percent)  only add up to 14.7 percent.

Japan also claims it has participated in eight UN peacekeeping operations,
dispatching over 4,600 civilian and military personnel. Additionally, it bears
about one-fifth of the cost of UN peacekeeping operations.

Bennis argued that Japan's payment of dues do not entitle it to "buy"
a Security Council seat.

She said that UN dues structures are based on the size of a country's economy
 so that the actual economic impact of the 20 percent payment to the UN
on Japan's economy is no different from the effect of the few tens of thousands
of dollars paid by the poorest countries of south Asia or sub-Saharan Africa.

"The legitimacy of the undemocratic and discredited Council will not be
served by adding Japan, another wealthy northern country to its list of already
over-represented wealthy northern countries," she added.

Thalif Deen has
been Inter Press Service's U.N. Bureau Chief since 1992. A
former Information Officer at the U.N. Secretariat and a one-time member
of
the Sri Lanka delegation to the General Assembly sessions, he is currently
editor of the Journal of the Group of 77, published in collaboration
with
IPS. A Fulbright-Hayes scholar, he holds a Master's degree in Journalism
from Columbia University in New York.

Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
without written permission is strictly prohibited.
Copyright 2003 Antiwar.com