Washington’s Anti-Russia Campaign

A new Gallup poll showing Americanssee Russia as this nation’s publicenemy number one has confirmedthe extent to which Washington andits closest ally, Britain, have manipulated public opinion in America.

The poll confirmed that a majority of Americansplaced Russia ahead of North Korea, China and Iran as posing the greatest threat to the West.

Washington and Britain were not present at the recent talks in Minsk to negotiate a ceasefire deal with Russia over the conflict in East Ukraine. The basic reason is they do not wish to see a resolve to the fighting. In Britain and in the United States there is a daily drumbeat of negative stories about Russia and its leader, Vladimir Putin. Some of the headlines have been about Russian bombers flying close to British air space. Others have warned Russia is planning to invade the Baltic States and Moldova. This kind of media coverage has created a public perception that Putin is another Josef Stalin and is drawing the world into another Cold War.

The absence of Washington and London from the Minsk talks, chaired by Moscow and Berlin, was evidence of a growing Western alliance aimed at weakening Russia. Both London and Washington have, unlike many European nations, been clamoring for tougher sanctions to damage Russia’s economy. President Barack Hussein Obama has consistently spoken of Putin in a derogatory fashion (34:30), something mature leaders tend not to do. It may well be Obama has a personal resentment of Putin because the Russian leader outmaneuvered him over the conflict in Syria. He also enabled Obama to keep the Iran nuclear talks on track.

This narrative, however, has not reached theAmerican public. Instead, there has been a mediacampaign of scare stories about Putin. The Ukraineconflict, too, has been reported, without relianceon facts. For example, there has been no focus onthe alliance between Washington and big corporategiants, especially in the agriculture sector, that aredetermined to get control of Ukraine’s tens of millionsof acres of the most fertile land in Europe. Infact, Ukraine has between 30%-40% of all the arableland in Europe. Massive tracts of land have alreadybeen bought up by Western agribusiness giants,many of them, like Monsanto and DuPont, connectedto the growing of genetically modifiedcrops. In fact, after the contrived revolution inUkraine, orchestrated by slash-and-burn speculatorGeorge Soros and Washington in 2013, a deal wasreached between the European Union and the new Ukrainiangovernment to explore the use of bio-engineeringin crop production.

Forgotten in the latest Gallup poll is the fact thatbig oil giants, which have a major influence onWashington’s foreign policy, would like to see Russiacrushed because they have no financial stake inRussia’s energy sector. Then there are the Cold War“warriors” in Washington who still adhere to the beliefthat the task of “democratizing” Russia is notcomplete and it may take a Cold War and the humiliation of Russia to get the job done.

Putin fully understands what is going on. In his op-ed for The New York Times on September 11, 2013, hehad this to say to the American public: “Millionsaround the world increasingly see America not as amodel of democracy but as relying solely on bruteforce, cobbling coalitions together under the slogan ‘you’re either with us or against us.’”

In a March 18, 2014 address to State Duma deputies, Federation Council members, heads of Russian regions and civil society representatives in the Kremlin, Putinlamented the fact Russia has made overtures to theWest but they had been rebuffed. Perhaps it was becausethe fix was in to punish and weaken Russia.He said the following: “Russia strived to engage indialogue with our colleagues in the West. We constantlypropose cooperation on every critical question,want to strengthen the level of trust, want ourrelations to be equal, open and honest. But we have not seen reciprocal steps.”

Those were hardly the words of America’s public enemy number one.

Richard Walker is the pen name of a former N.Y. news producer.

Putin Named Man of the Year by History Magazine

By Paul Angel

Without truth in history, the world iscondemned to war after war, miseryafter misery. This cycle of history isotherwise unstoppable. Governmentsdon’t want truth in history. Armamentsmakers don’t want truth in history.Brainwashed politicians don’t want truth in history.Mainstream historians who have based their careerson the falsehoods of war propaganda don’t wanttruth in history. Do they care that our military hospitalsare filled with maimed and broken soldierswho so bravely fought in far-off lands against enemiescreated by our ludicrous foreign policies? Theanswer is obvious. What our leaders want is a half understandingof history so that the masses are easilycontrolled and whipped into a belligerent frenzy.Nothing works so well to accomplish this goal aswar fever, a completely curable syndrome. The remedy?A good dose of the truth.

Herman Goering, at the Nuremberg War Trials,said: “Naturally the common people don’t want war:neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matterin Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it isthe leaders of the country who determine the policy,and it is always a simple matter to drag the peoplealong, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorshipor a parliament or a Communist dictatorship.. . . It works the same in any country.”

And so it is today. America must always have aslavering, bestial enemy at our doorstep to defeat—another “Hitler” on the threshold. Today, our leadershave created that bogeyman. His name is VladimirPutin. And we believe Putin could in fact be the lasthope for the world. A man who could be the savior—not the destroyer—of the West.

And this is why THE BARNES REVIEW is proudly declaring thatVladimir Putin is TBR’s “Man of the Year” for 2015.How ironic it is that Putin, born, bred and forged inthe Zionist-inspired Soviet Union, could have everreceived our vote. But such is the world today. Wepray also that our leaders come to understand thatfurther provocation against Russia could lead to awar that would surely sentence the United States to eternal ruination.

Paul Angel is the managing editor of THE BARNES REVIEW. Willis Carto, the publisherof TBR, has made Vladimir Putin his “man of the year” in the March/April edition.That issue is currently at the printer being prepared for mailing. To reserve anadvance copy of that issue, send $10 to TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003or call TBR toll free at 1-877-773-9077 to charge your copy. Send just $46 for a one year subscription. (Outside U.S. email sales@barnesreview.org for foreign prices.)

VLADIMIR PUTIN

The Real Peace Prize President

By Pete Papaherakles —

Russian nationalist leaderVladimir Putin has beenbrutally demonized by theWestern mainstream mediaas being an aggressor andan invader, but it is clear that the oppositeis true. The peace deal in Ukrainehe recently brokered with France andGermany again proves that Putin hasexercised great restraint to Westernprovocations and has come through as a true peace president.

The West’s propaganda machine hasbeen spinning the narrative that PresidentBarack Hussein Obama is the peace presidentby awarding him a Nobel Peaceprize shortly after he became president,although he did nothing to deserveit. Since then, however, Obamahas escalated the war in Afghanistan,destroyed Libya, financed the war inSyria and the war in Ukraine and isnow looking to attack Iraq again, notto mention meddling in Pakistan, Yemen and Egypt.

Obama’s wars and interventions,which have resulted in tens of thousandsof deaths and millions of displacedrefugees, have purportedlybeen done under the auspices of fightingfor democracy and human rights.But it doesn’t take a genius to seethrough the hypocrisy and deception.The military-industrial-banking complexand the Zionist-Anglo-Americanempire are reaping billions in profits asthey work to consolidate power in theMiddle East and Eastern Europe. Sofar, though, the only one who has been standing in their way has been Putin.

The reason Syria was not turnedinto a smoldering heap of ash in 2013was due to Putin’s strong leadership inexposing that Syrian President Basharal-Assad was framed and did not gas his own people.

Now, with Ukraine, Putin onceagain shows true leadership. Evenafter being relentlessly provoked bysanctions and false accusations, Putinhas kept his composure and managedto broker a peace deal with France,Germany and Ukraine even while theObama administration was looking toescalate the war and sell more arms to Kiev.

German magazine National Zeitungrecently reported that Putin has beenreaching out to nationalists in Europeto set up seminars for many new Europeanpolitical parties, supporters andleaders. He is actively seeking out partieslike the National Front in France,the British Independent Party, the HungarianJobbik Party and the Italian Lega Nord, among others.

“Russia stands for traditional familyvalues, national sovereignty and amulti-polar world,” reported NationalZeitung. “This is a new defining momentopposing world government aspromoted by the U.S. and its ‘friends.’”

For that reason, AMERICAN FREEPRESS proposes that Obama bestripped of his Nobel prize and that thecoveted international medal be givento the peace president who really deserves it: Vladimir Putin.

Pete Papaherakles is a writer and political cartoonist for AFP and is also AFP’s outreach director. Pete is interested in getting AFP writers and editors on the podium at patriotic events. Call him at 202-544-5977 if you know of an event youthink AFP should attend.

Russia, Not the United States, Has Vital Interests in Ukraine

By Patrick J. Buchanan

Hopefully, the recent truce betweenRussian President Vladimir Putinand Ukraine’s Petro Poroshenko,brokered in Minsk by GermanChancellor Angela Merkel, willhold. For nothing good, but muchevil, could come of broadening and lengthening this war that has cost the lives of 5,400 Ukrainians.

The longer it goes on, the greater the casualties,the more land Ukraine will lose and the greater thelikelihood Kiev will end up an amputated and bankruptrepublic, a dependency the size of France on the doorstep of Europe.

Had no truce been achieved, 8,000 Ukrainiantroops trapped in the Debaltseve pocket could havebeen forced to surrender or be wiped out, causinga regime crisis in Kiev. U.S. weapons could havebegun flowing in, setting the stage for a collision between Russia and the United States.

One understands Russia’s vital interest in retainingits Black Sea naval base in Crimea and keepingUkraine out of NATO. And one sees the vital interestof Ukraine in not losing the Donbass. But what is America’s vital interest here?

Merkel says a great principle is at stake, that inpost-Cold War Europe, borders are not to be changed by force. That is idealistic, but is it realistic?

At the Cold War’s end, Yugoslavia split into sevennations, the USSR into 15. Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo,even Slovenia briefly had to fight to break free. So,too, did the statelets of South Ossetia and Abkhaziain breaking from Georgia, and Transnistria from Moldova.

Inside Russia there are still minorities such asthe Chechens who wish to break free. And in manyof the new nations like Ukraine, there are ethnic Russians who want to go home.

Indeed, a spirit of secessionism pervades the continent of Europe.

But while London permitted the Scottish secessionistsa vote, Madrid refuses to concede that rightto the Basques or Catalans. And some of these ethnicminorities may one day fight to break free, as the Irish did a century ago.

Yet of all of the secessionist movements from theAtlantic to the Urals, none imperils a vital interestof the United States. None is really our business. And none justifies a war with Russia.

Indeed, what is it about this generation of Americansthat makes us such compulsive meddlers inthe affairs of nations we could not find on a map?Consider if you will our particular affliction: Putin paranoia.

Forty years ago, this writer was in Moscow withRichard Nixon on his last summit with LeonidBrezhnev. It was not a contentious affair, thoughthe USSR was then the command center of an immenseempire that stretched from Berlin to theBering Sea.

And when we are warned that Putin wishes torestore that USSR of 1974 and to reassemble thatSoviet Empire of yesterday, have we really considered what that would require of him?

To restore the USSR, Putin would have to recaptureLithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine, Moldova,Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan,Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, an area the size of the United States.

To resurrect the Soviet Empire, Putin wouldhave to invade and occupy Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary,Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, and then overrun Germany to the Elbe River.

How far along is Putin in re-establishing the empireof the czars and commissars? He has reannexedCrimea, which is roughly the size of Vermont,and which the Romanovs acquired in the 18th century.

Yet almost daily we hear the din from CapitolHill, “The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!”

That there is bad blood between America andPutin is undeniable. And, indeed, Putin has his quarrels with us as well.

In his eyes, we took advantage of the dissolutionof the USSR to move NATO into Eastern Europeand the Baltic republics. We used our color-codedrevolutions to dump over pro-Russian regimes inSerbia, Ukraine, Georgia and Kyrgyzstan.

Yet beyond our mutual distrust, or even contempt, is there not common ground between us?

During the Cold War, Russia was in thrall to anideology hostile to all we believed in. She had rulerswho commanded a world empire. Yet we had presidents who could do business with Moscow.

If we could negotiate with neo-Stalinist issues asgrave as the Berlin Wall and ballistic missiles inCuba, why cannot we sit down with Putin and discussless earthshaking matters, such as whose flag should fly over Luhansk and Donetsk?

Wladyslaw Biernacki in Prophecies book of apparitions indicate that during WWIII, China will invade Russia whose armies all surrender so Polish Army blocked the roads to Moscow but took heavy casualties so withdrew 100 miles but Chinese shot off many atomic missiles which Poles deflected by NATO machines back upon the Chinese causing an explosion felt around the world knocking the earth off its axis for 3 days so that no one could stand up but had to sit down or lie in bed. All God’s enemies are killed by angels during these 3 days by lightning strikes. Then USA forces in a huge armada invade China and race to Siberia and wipe out the Chinese saving Mother Russia.

You believe these polls? Everyone that is for the Jewish Zionist Agenda of attacking Orthodox Christians is Rigged! The Polls are BS like Obama’s Facebook count.

You actually think people in the U.S. consider Russia its main enemy?

The Jewish Zionists will try and try. They will use Hollywood to try and sway the American, ‘er America, people to hate Russia to fall into another trap of we must go to war with such and such, but no not this time, it won’t work.

American Taxpayers give $4 BILLION a year to Israel. How much of YOUR $4 BILLION is coming back to America as BRIBES to “your” politicians? The Stooges that fall all over themselves putting Israel’s interests AHEAD of America!

NeoCon was INVENTED by Irving Kristol and his CABAL of TROTSKYITE COMMUNISTS.
NeoCon is COMMUNISM wrapped in an American flag.
NeoCons refuse to WEAR an American uniform. They just wrap themselves in the flag and send YOU and YOURS to be maimed and killed.
Today’s American NeoCons are yesterday’s Jewish Bolsheviks. SAME THING.
The correct spelling is neoCOMMUNIST.
The whole neocon thing is nothing but a Zionist takeover of the conservative U.S. establishment.
WHY did American “conservatives” allow a Jewish COMMUNIST to lead them away from putting AMERICA FIRST, SECOND, and THIRD in their priority list? Israel is NOT AMERICA and is NOT our “ally.” Israel is a SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST/TRIBE.
NOTE: It was USSR, Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics, not “COMMUNIST” Republics. Of the 502 highest officers of the 1917 First Soviet Socialist Government, 467 were Jews. Alexandr Solzenitzyn writes in his last book on the history of Russia that the Jews murdered over 66 million Russians. Marx, Engels, Trotsky, Bakunum, Lenin, Stalin, Kruschev, and others were all Jews by two or at least one parent. All the prison camps, torture chambers, gulags, etc. were all commanded and run by Jews.

Required fields are marked with an *. Your email address will not be published. All comments containing hyperlinks will be held in moderation until they are formatted properly, but will be posted. All comments containing obscenities will be amended and posted, unless they are too obscene and nonsensical, in which case they will be deleted.