Listen, I am a Venezuelan. I advice you: don't talk like that about the persecuted, of a persecuted church. There are several reasons not to do such an infamy. 1) You don't want to be contemptible, it's not becoming. 2) You might be smearing the meritorious in the eyes of God. 3) It's a grave offense to charity. 4) You are talking about the church in Hispanoamerica in a way that is most …More

Listen, I am a Venezuelan. I advice you: don't talk like that about the persecuted, of a persecuted church. There are several reasons not to do such an infamy. 1) You don't want to be contemptible, it's not becoming. 2) You might be smearing the meritorious in the eyes of God. 3) It's a grave offense to charity. 4) You are talking about the church in Hispanoamerica in a way that is most shamefull: the area of the planet where there are most catholics and the Lung of the universal Church for centuries, under fierce attack from our protestant, mason and "others" neighbors from the north (as the Cristeros should suffice as proof). You, in reality, don't know but testimonies about Peña, those that say he is corrupt and, now, this of the bishops, who defend him. You don't have a way of deciding between the two, so you should be more careful. I mean, a few months ago, you were defending the communist genocidal regime which kills my people in who knows whose name. If I know for a fact that a prelate or a priest are corrupt, I have no problem denouncing them, like in the case of Arturo Sosa or Frank himself, but otherwise, silence is in order