BGRBGRhttps://bgr.com
Tech and entertainment news, reviews, opinions and insightsen2019-01-21T20:58:18+00:00hourly1http://wordpress.com/https://secure.gravatar.com/blavatar/616256b50efddd8ae9b0c7f1f339a9f5?s=96&d=https%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fbuttonw-com.pngBGRhttps://bgr.com
Huge leak reveals Galaxy S10 pricing and confirms 1TB storage tierhttps://bgr.com/2019/01/21/galaxy-s10-plus-price-vs-galaxy-s10-lite-12gb-of-ram-will-be-costly/
http://bgr.com/?p=56917452019-01-21T20:40:58+00:00Chris Smith
plenty of leaked benchmarks. On top of that, Samsung is making at least one 5G version of the phone, which should be twice as expensive as the most affordable handset. A few days ago, press renders from an accessory maker gave us a great look at the phone’s design, just as Samsung continued teasing the phone. All we need now are the exact prices for these new phones, and, right on cue, there’s a massive leak for that, too.
Italian blog Tutto Android has obtained details about Samsung’s Galaxy S10 plans for Italy — which should coincide with Samsung’s plans for the entire EU region.
The report reiterates what we already knew from previous rumors. Samsung will sell three Galaxy S10 phones in Italy, including the 5.8-inch Galaxy S10 Lite, the 6.1-inch Galaxy S10, and the 6.4-inch Galaxy S10+. The first will have a flat screen, while the bigger models will get curved displays, just like their predecessors. The Lite model will also be the only phone not to feature an in-display fingerprint sensor. The Lite and regular S10 will have single-lens selfie cams, the report says, while the Galaxy S10+ is getting a dual selfie shooter.
All three phones will be available in black, white, and green, with the S10 Lite also getting a yellow option. The Galaxy S10+ will have two unique color options that were not disclosed, but it won’t come in a ceramic model, as was rumored over the weekend. Tutto Android also provided prices for the models Samsung will sell in Europe:

Galaxy S10 Lite 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €779 ($885)

Galaxy S10 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €929 ($1,056)

Galaxy S10 8GB RAM / 512GB storage: €1,179 ($1,340)

Galaxy S10+ 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €1,049 ($1,192)

Galaxy S10+ 8GB RAM / 512GB storage: €1,299 ($1,477)

Galaxy S10+ 12GB RAM / 1TB storage: €1,600 ($1,819)

As you can see, Samsung will increase base storage from 64GB to 128GB, which is undoubtedly a great move. Also, there won’t be a 256GB storage tier for any model, if this report is correct, with Samsung going for 512GB or 1TB of built-in storage. And yes, if this leak is accurate, Samsung will make the world's first phone with 12GB of RAM, which sounds crazy — and I'm typing these words on a laptop that has "just" 8GB of memory.
Finally, the report also says the phone will be available in stores in Italy on March 8th. Samsung’s Unpacked press event, meanwhile, will take place in San Francisco on February 20th.]]>

Huge leak reveals Galaxy S10 pricing and confirms 1TB storage tier

Mobile

BGR-Galaxy-Note-9-5

For the past few months, we’ve witnessed an increasing number of Galaxy S10 rumors, revealing almost everything fans of the series would want to know about the phone. Report after report told us the same story: Samsung will have three distinct 4G Galaxy S10 models in stores this spring, including a phone with a flat screen. All three will feature Infinity-O screens and multi-lens cameras, and the premium models will feature an in-display fingerprint sensor.
We then learned more details about the phone’s specs, including camera, storage, and battery details, and we saw plenty of leaked benchmarks. On top of that, Samsung is making at least one 5G version of the phone, which should be twice as expensive as the most affordable handset. A few days ago, press renders from an accessory maker gave us a great look at the phone’s design, just as Samsung continued teasing the phone. All we need now are the exact prices for these new phones, and, right on cue, there’s a massive leak for that, too.
Italian blog Tutto Android has obtained details about Samsung’s Galaxy S10 plans for Italy — which should coincide with Samsung’s plans for the entire EU region.
The report reiterates what we already knew from previous rumors. Samsung will sell three Galaxy S10 phones in Italy, including the 5.8-inch Galaxy S10 Lite, the 6.1-inch Galaxy S10, and the 6.4-inch Galaxy S10+. The first will have a flat screen, while the bigger models will get curved displays, just like their predecessors. The Lite model will also be the only phone not to feature an in-display fingerprint sensor. The Lite and regular S10 will have single-lens selfie cams, the report says, while the Galaxy S10+ is getting a dual selfie shooter.
All three phones will be available in black, white, and green, with the S10 Lite also getting a yellow option. The Galaxy S10+ will have two unique color options that were not disclosed, but it won’t come in a ceramic model, as was rumored over the weekend. Tutto Android also provided prices for the models Samsung will sell in Europe:

Galaxy S10 Lite 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €779 ($885)

Galaxy S10 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €929 ($1,056)

Galaxy S10 8GB RAM / 512GB storage: €1,179 ($1,340)

Galaxy S10+ 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €1,049 ($1,192)

Galaxy S10+ 8GB RAM / 512GB storage: €1,299 ($1,477)

Galaxy S10+ 12GB RAM / 1TB storage: €1,600 ($1,819)

As you can see, Samsung will increase base storage from 64GB to 128GB, which is undoubtedly a great move. Also, there won’t be a 256GB storage tier for any model, if this report is correct, with Samsung going for 512GB or 1TB of built-in storage. And yes, if this leak is accurate, Samsung will make the world's first phone with 12GB of RAM, which sounds crazy — and I'm typing these words on a laptop that has "just" 8GB of memory.
Finally, the report also says the phone will be available in stores in Italy on March 8th. Samsung’s Unpacked press event, meanwhile, will take place in San Francisco on February 20th.
For the past few months, we’ve witnessed an increasing number of Galaxy S10 rumors, revealing almost everything fans of the series would want to know about the phone. Report after report told us the same story: Samsung will have three distinct 4G Galaxy S10 models in stores this spring, including a phone with a flat screen. All three will feature Infinity-O screens and multi-lens cameras, and the premium models will feature an in-display fingerprint sensor.
We then learned more details about the phone’s specs, including camera, storage, and battery details, and we saw plenty of leaked benchmarks. On top of that, Samsung is making at least one 5G version of the phone, which should be twice as expensive as the most affordable handset. A few days ago, press renders from an accessory maker gave us a great look at the phone’s design, just as Samsung continued teasing the phone. All we need now are the exact prices for these new phones, and, right on cue, there’s a massive leak for that, too.
Italian blog Tutto Android has obtained details about Samsung’s Galaxy S10 plans for Italy — which should coincide with Samsung’s plans for the entire EU region.
The report reiterates what we already knew from previous rumors. Samsung will sell three Galaxy S10 phones in Italy, including the 5.8-inch Galaxy S10 Lite, the 6.1-inch Galaxy S10, and the 6.4-inch Galaxy S10+. The first will have a flat screen, while the bigger models will get curved displays, just like their predecessors. The Lite model will also be the only phone not to feature an in-display fingerprint sensor. The Lite and regular S10 will have single-lens selfie cams, the report says, while the Galaxy S10+ is getting a dual selfie shooter.
All three phones will be available in black, white, and green, with the S10 Lite also getting a yellow option. The Galaxy S10+ will have two unique color options that were not disclosed, but it won’t come in a ceramic model, as was rumored over the weekend. Tutto Android also provided prices for the models Samsung will sell in Europe:

Galaxy S10 Lite 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €779 ($885)

Galaxy S10 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €929 ($1,056)

Galaxy S10 8GB RAM / 512GB storage: €1,179 ($1,340)

Galaxy S10+ 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €1,049 ($1,192)

Galaxy S10+ 8GB RAM / 512GB storage: €1,299 ($1,477)

Galaxy S10+ 12GB RAM / 1TB storage: €1,600 ($1,819)

As you can see, Samsung will increase base storage from 64GB to 128GB, which is undoubtedly a great move. Also, there won’t be a 256GB storage tier for any model, if this report is correct, with Samsung going for 512GB or 1TB of built-in storage. And yes, if this leak is accurate, Samsung will make the world's first phone with 12GB of RAM, which sounds crazy — and I'm typing these words on a laptop that has "just" 8GB of memory.
Finally, the report also says the phone will be available in stores in Italy on March 8th. Samsung’s Unpacked press event, meanwhile, will take place in San Francisco on February 20th.

For the past few months, we’ve witnessed an increasing number of Galaxy S10 rumors, revealing almost everything fans of the series would want to know about the phone. Report after report told us the same story: Samsung will have three distinct 4G Galaxy S10 models in stores this spring, including a phone with a flat screen. All three will feature Infinity-O screens and multi-lens cameras, and the premium models will feature an in-display fingerprint sensor.

Italian blog Tutto Android has obtained details about Samsung’s Galaxy S10 plans for Italy — which should coincide with Samsung’s plans for the entire EU region.

The report reiterates what we already knew from previous rumors. Samsung will sell three Galaxy S10 phones in Italy, including the 5.8-inch Galaxy S10 Lite, the 6.1-inch Galaxy S10, and the 6.4-inch Galaxy S10+. The first will have a flat screen, while the bigger models will get curved displays, just like their predecessors. The Lite model will also be the only phone not to feature an in-display fingerprint sensor. The Lite and regular S10 will have single-lens selfie cams, the report says, while the Galaxy S10+ is getting a dual selfie shooter.

All three phones will be available in black, white, and green, with the S10 Lite also getting a yellow option. The Galaxy S10+ will have two unique color options that were not disclosed, but it won’t come in a ceramic model, as was rumored over the weekend. Tutto Android also provided prices for the models Samsung will sell in Europe:

Galaxy S10 Lite 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €779 ($885)

Galaxy S10 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €929 ($1,056)

Galaxy S10 8GB RAM / 512GB storage: €1,179 ($1,340)

Galaxy S10+ 6GB RAM / 128GB storage: €1,049 ($1,192)

Galaxy S10+ 8GB RAM / 512GB storage: €1,299 ($1,477)

Galaxy S10+ 12GB RAM / 1TB storage: €1,600 ($1,819)

As you can see, Samsung will increase base storage from 64GB to 128GB, which is undoubtedly a great move. Also, there won’t be a 256GB storage tier for any model, if this report is correct, with Samsung going for 512GB or 1TB of built-in storage. And yes, if this leak is accurate, Samsung will make the world’s first phone with 12GB of RAM, which sounds crazy — and I’m typing these words on a laptop that has “just” 8GB of memory.

Finally, the report also says the phone will be available in stores in Italy on March 8th. Samsung’s Unpacked press event, meanwhile, will take place in San Francisco on February 20th.

]]>
A robot that’ll clean your toilets for you just launched on Amazonhttps://bgr.com/2019/01/21/toilet-cleaning-robot-on-amazon/
http://bgr.com/?p=56915662019-01-21T20:21:56+00:00Maren Estrada
Giddel Toilet Cleaning Robot was just released on Amazon for $499.99, and it does exactly what the name suggests. It comes with a special toilet seat (elongated and round options are available) and the robot connects to the inner part of the seat. Leave it alone for a while so it can do its thing, and then you’ll come back to a sparkling clean bowl.
Here’s more info from the product page:

Giddel Scrubs Hard To Reach Places - The Rim, The Inner Rim, Under The Rim, The Entire Bowl Down To The Exit. Efficacy Tested By SGS.

A robot that’ll clean your toilets for you just launched on Amazon

Accessories

giddel-toilet-cleaning-robot

Most of the personal robots companies are working on right now are silly. Do you really need a glorified Amazon Echo following you around the house just so you can access Alexa? If there’s one job we would love to have a robot do for us, it’s cleaning toilets. And now, if you’re willing to cough up the cash, there is indeed a robot that will scrub your porcelain for you. The Giddel Toilet Cleaning Robot was just released on Amazon for $499.99, and it does exactly what the name suggests. It comes with a special toilet seat (elongated and round options are available) and the robot connects to the inner part of the seat. Leave it alone for a while so it can do its thing, and then you’ll come back to a sparkling clean bowl.
Here’s more info from the product page:

Giddel Scrubs Hard To Reach Places - The Rim, The Inner Rim, Under The Rim, The Entire Bowl Down To The Exit. Efficacy Tested By SGS.

Easy To Install, One-Time Set Up. Water Resistant For Electrical Safety, Durability, Can Withstand Acidic Conditions Created By Toilet Bowl Cleaners.

Most of the personal robots companies are working on right now are silly. Do you really need a glorified Amazon Echo following you around the house just so you can access Alexa? If there’s one job we would love to have a robot do for us, it’s cleaning toilets. And now, if you’re willing to cough up the cash, there is indeed a robot that will scrub your porcelain for you. The Giddel Toilet Cleaning Robot was just released on Amazon for $499.99, and it does exactly what the name suggests. It comes with a special toilet seat (elongated and round options are available) and the robot connects to the inner part of the seat. Leave it alone for a while so it can do its thing, and then you’ll come back to a sparkling clean bowl.
Here’s more info from the product page:

Giddel Scrubs Hard To Reach Places - The Rim, The Inner Rim, Under The Rim, The Entire Bowl Down To The Exit. Efficacy Tested By SGS.

Easy To Install, One-Time Set Up. Water Resistant For Electrical Safety, Durability, Can Withstand Acidic Conditions Created By Toilet Bowl Cleaners.

Most of the personal robots companies are working on right now are silly. Do you really need a glorified Amazon Echo following you around the house just so you can access Alexa? If there’s one job we would love to have a robot do for us, it’s cleaning toilets. And now, if you’re willing to cough up the cash, there is indeed a robot that will scrub your porcelain for you. The Giddel Toilet Cleaning Robot was just released on Amazon for $499.99, and it does exactly what the name suggests. It comes with a special toilet seat (elongated and round options are available) and the robot connects to the inner part of the seat. Leave it alone for a while so it can do its thing, and then you’ll come back to a sparkling clean bowl.

Here’s more info from the product page:

Giddel Scrubs Hard To Reach Places – The Rim, The Inner Rim, Under The Rim, The Entire Bowl Down To The Exit. Efficacy Tested By SGS.

Easy To Install, One-Time Set Up. Water Resistant For Electrical Safety, Durability, Can Withstand Acidic Conditions Created By Toilet Bowl Cleaners.

]]>
Google hit with $57 million GDPR fine, the first for a US tech companyhttps://bgr.com/2019/01/21/google-gdpr-fine-57-million-us-first/
http://bgr.com/?p=56917502019-01-21T20:02:53+00:00Andy MeekThe CNIL's statement goes on to note that “the infringements observed deprive the users of essential guarantees regarding processing operations that can reveal important parts of their private life since they are based on a huge amount of data, a wide variety of services and almost unlimited possible combinations.” The penalty is also connected to the way the French agency sees Google as not being clear enough in a broad sense about how user data is collected and how it's subsequently used.
Google released a statement saying it hasn't decided yet whether to appeal this punishment, which certainly didn't come as a surprise. Once the General Data Protection Regulation, known as GDPR for short, went into effect in Europe last year, it was regarded as only a matter of time before regulators there would use the stricter privacy framework to push back on tech giants in a way that's not happening in the US.
The CNIL statement goes on to provide context for the fine against Google by noting that "This is the first time that the CNIL applies the new sanction limits provided by the GDPR. The amount decided, and the publicity of the fine, are justified by the severity of the infringements observed regarding the essential principles of the GDPR -- transparency, information and consent."
Google, for its part, acknowledged that "high standards" of transparency and control are expected of the company by the public and that Google is "committed to meeting those expectations and the consent requirements of the GDPR." The new fine, however, is yet another example of European-led pushback against the search giant, which has also come under fire from EU officials over antitrust concerns.
Along those lines, the EU hit Google with a record-setting $5 billion fine last year for antitrust issues related to its Android mobile operating system.]]>

Google hit with $57 million GDPR fine, the first for a US tech company

Business

AP Explains Google Search Results, Portland, USA - 28 Aug 2018

Google has kicked off 2019 by getting hit with yet another multimillion-dollar fine from a European regulator.
Stemming from an investigation that began in May -- the day after Europe's strict new data privacy rules known as GDPR went into effect -- France's data protection authority has announced a $57 million fine against Google in the first such GDPR penalty levied against a US technology company. In a statement explaining the action, the French agency known as the CNIL noted that the fine is a result of deficiencies that include Google not being clear enough about the way user data is handled to present personalized ads.
The CNIL's statement goes on to note that “the infringements observed deprive the users of essential guarantees regarding processing operations that can reveal important parts of their private life since they are based on a huge amount of data, a wide variety of services and almost unlimited possible combinations.” The penalty is also connected to the way the French agency sees Google as not being clear enough in a broad sense about how user data is collected and how it's subsequently used.
Google released a statement saying it hasn't decided yet whether to appeal this punishment, which certainly didn't come as a surprise. Once the General Data Protection Regulation, known as GDPR for short, went into effect in Europe last year, it was regarded as only a matter of time before regulators there would use the stricter privacy framework to push back on tech giants in a way that's not happening in the US.
The CNIL statement goes on to provide context for the fine against Google by noting that "This is the first time that the CNIL applies the new sanction limits provided by the GDPR. The amount decided, and the publicity of the fine, are justified by the severity of the infringements observed regarding the essential principles of the GDPR -- transparency, information and consent."
Google, for its part, acknowledged that "high standards" of transparency and control are expected of the company by the public and that Google is "committed to meeting those expectations and the consent requirements of the GDPR." The new fine, however, is yet another example of European-led pushback against the search giant, which has also come under fire from EU officials over antitrust concerns.
Along those lines, the EU hit Google with a record-setting $5 billion fine last year for antitrust issues related to its Android mobile operating system.
Google has kicked off 2019 by getting hit with yet another multimillion-dollar fine from a European regulator.
Stemming from an investigation that began in May -- the day after Europe's strict new data privacy rules known as GDPR went into effect -- France's data protection authority has announced a $57 million fine against Google in the first such GDPR penalty levied against a US technology company. In a statement explaining the action, the French agency known as the CNIL noted that the fine is a result of deficiencies that include Google not being clear enough about the way user data is handled to present personalized ads.
The CNIL's statement goes on to note that “the infringements observed deprive the users of essential guarantees regarding processing operations that can reveal important parts of their private life since they are based on a huge amount of data, a wide variety of services and almost unlimited possible combinations.” The penalty is also connected to the way the French agency sees Google as not being clear enough in a broad sense about how user data is collected and how it's subsequently used.
Google released a statement saying it hasn't decided yet whether to appeal this punishment, which certainly didn't come as a surprise. Once the General Data Protection Regulation, known as GDPR for short, went into effect in Europe last year, it was regarded as only a matter of time before regulators there would use the stricter privacy framework to push back on tech giants in a way that's not happening in the US.
The CNIL statement goes on to provide context for the fine against Google by noting that "This is the first time that the CNIL applies the new sanction limits provided by the GDPR. The amount decided, and the publicity of the fine, are justified by the severity of the infringements observed regarding the essential principles of the GDPR -- transparency, information and consent."
Google, for its part, acknowledged that "high standards" of transparency and control are expected of the company by the public and that Google is "committed to meeting those expectations and the consent requirements of the GDPR." The new fine, however, is yet another example of European-led pushback against the search giant, which has also come under fire from EU officials over antitrust concerns.
Along those lines, the EU hit Google with a record-setting $5 billion fine last year for antitrust issues related to its Android mobile operating system.

Google has kicked off 2019 by getting hit with yet another multimillion-dollar fine from a European regulator.

Stemming from an investigation that began in May — the day after Europe’s strict new data privacy rules known as GDPR went into effect — France’s data protection authority has announced a $57 million fine against Google in the first such GDPR penalty levied against a US technology company. In a statement explaining the action, the French agency known as the CNIL noted that the fine is a result of deficiencies that include Google not being clear enough about the way user data is handled to present personalized ads.

The CNIL’s statement goes on to note that “the infringements observed deprive the users of essential guarantees regarding processing operations that can reveal important parts of their private life since they are based on a huge amount of data, a wide variety of services and almost unlimited possible combinations.” The penalty is also connected to the way the French agency sees Google as not being clear enough in a broad sense about how user data is collected and how it’s subsequently used.

Google released a statement saying it hasn’t decided yet whether to appeal this punishment, which certainly didn’t come as a surprise. Once the General Data Protection Regulation, known as GDPR for short, went into effect in Europe last year, it was regarded as only a matter of time before regulators there would use the stricter privacy framework to push back on tech giants in a way that’s not happening in the US.

The CNIL statement goes on to provide context for the fine against Google by noting that “This is the first time that the CNIL applies the new sanction limits provided by the GDPR. The amount decided, and the publicity of the fine, are justified by the severity of the infringements observed regarding the essential principles of the GDPR — transparency, information and consent.”

Google, for its part, acknowledged that “high standards” of transparency and control are expected of the company by the public and that Google is “committed to meeting those expectations and the consent requirements of the GDPR.” The new fine, however, is yet another example of European-led pushback against the search giant, which has also come under fire from EU officials over antitrust concerns.

Along those lines, the EU hit Google with a record-setting $5 billion fine last year for antitrust issues related to its Android mobile operating system.

]]>
This $18 accessory brings the best thing about the Fire TV Stick to your Apple TVhttps://bgr.com/2019/01/21/apple-tv-mount-to-back-of-tv/
http://bgr.com/?p=56915712019-01-21T19:43:51+00:00Maren Estrada
how much Apple loves dongles. If you have an Apple TV and you wish you could tuck it away behind your flat screen like a dongle, your wish has just been granted. Pick up a TotalMount Apple TV Mount on Amazon and you’re good to go.
Here are some key details from the product page:

Mount for Apple TV (Apple TV and remote not included)

Perfect for wall-mounted televisions (Attaches Apple TV to the back of your television)

Compatible with all Apple TVs (including the new Apple TV 4K and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Apple TV generations)

Includes many premium, patented features

Includes three mounting options: innovative hooks for TV vents, special adhesive for elevated TV temperatures, and screws for wall mounting

]]>

This $18 accessory brings the best thing about the Fire TV Stick to your Apple TV

Accessories

apple-tv-4k-official-1

Streaming device makers used to be all about set top boxes. But now, thanks to things like the Fire TV Stick and Roku Streaming Stick, attention has shifted almost entirely to the dongle form factor. It’s so much better because you don’t need to have yet another box taking up space on one of your surfaces. Instead, these streaming sticks are tucked away behind your TV, never to be seen again. Apple doesn’t make a streaming dongle, which is pretty ironic considering how much Apple loves dongles. If you have an Apple TV and you wish you could tuck it away behind your flat screen like a dongle, your wish has just been granted. Pick up a TotalMount Apple TV Mount on Amazon and you’re good to go.
Here are some key details from the product page:

Mount for Apple TV (Apple TV and remote not included)

Perfect for wall-mounted televisions (Attaches Apple TV to the back of your television)

Compatible with all Apple TVs (including the new Apple TV 4K and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Apple TV generations)

Includes many premium, patented features

Includes three mounting options: innovative hooks for TV vents, special adhesive for elevated TV temperatures, and screws for wall mounting

Streaming device makers used to be all about set top boxes. But now, thanks to things like the Fire TV Stick and Roku Streaming Stick, attention has shifted almost entirely to the dongle form factor. It’s so much better because you don’t need to have yet another box taking up space on one of your surfaces. Instead, these streaming sticks are tucked away behind your TV, never to be seen again. Apple doesn’t make a streaming dongle, which is pretty ironic considering how much Apple loves dongles. If you have an Apple TV and you wish you could tuck it away behind your flat screen like a dongle, your wish has just been granted. Pick up a TotalMount Apple TV Mount on Amazon and you’re good to go.
Here are some key details from the product page:

Mount for Apple TV (Apple TV and remote not included)

Perfect for wall-mounted televisions (Attaches Apple TV to the back of your television)

Compatible with all Apple TVs (including the new Apple TV 4K and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Apple TV generations)

Includes many premium, patented features

Includes three mounting options: innovative hooks for TV vents, special adhesive for elevated TV temperatures, and screws for wall mounting

Streaming device makers used to be all about set top boxes. But now, thanks to things like the Fire TV Stick and Roku Streaming Stick, attention has shifted almost entirely to the dongle form factor. It’s so much better because you don’t need to have yet another box taking up space on one of your surfaces. Instead, these streaming sticks are tucked away behind your TV, never to be seen again. Apple doesn’t make a streaming dongle, which is pretty ironic considering how much Apple loves dongles. If you have an Apple TV and you wish you could tuck it away behind your flat screen like a dongle, your wish has just been granted. Pick up a TotalMount Apple TV Mount on Amazon and you’re good to go.

Here are some key details from the product page:

Mount for Apple TV (Apple TV and remote not included)

Perfect for wall-mounted televisions (Attaches Apple TV to the back of your television)

Compatible with all Apple TVs (including the new Apple TV 4K and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Apple TV generations)

Includes many premium, patented features

Includes three mounting options: innovative hooks for TV vents, special adhesive for elevated TV temperatures, and screws for wall mounting

]]>
Tesla increases Supercharger pricing across the globehttps://bgr.com/2019/01/21/tesla-supercharger-price-increase-across-the-world/
http://bgr.com/?p=56917202019-01-21T19:24:55+00:00Yoni Heisler
While free Supercharger access used to be an alluring incentive for new Tesla owners, Tesla has slowly phased that out as the number of Tesla vehicles on the road has exploded.
In a statement on the price increase provided to Electrek, a Tesla spokesperson explained:

We’re adjusting Supercharging pricing to better reflect differences in local electricity costs and site usage. As our fleet grows, we continue to open new Supercharger locations weekly so more drivers can travel long distances at a fraction of the cost of gasoline and with zero emissions. As has always been the case, Supercharging is not meant to be a profit center for Tesla.

Put simply, Tesla may not be looking to turn a profit from its Supercharger stations, but it doesn't want to lose money on it either. All told, it's still cheaper to recharge a Tesla -- even with the price increase -- than it is to fill up a traditional car with gas.
Incidentally, Elon Musk a few months ago said that Tesla has plans to significantly expand the reach of its Supercharger network by the end of 2019 and that 95% to 100% of people in “active markets” will be “within range” of a charging station before 2020.]]>

Tesla increases Supercharger pricing across the globe

Cars

tesla-supercharger

Tesla is in the midst of an interesting transition these days. Just a few years ago, the company had to prove that it could market an EVs to the masses. And with the release of the award-winning Model S a few years ago, Tesla did just that. Flash forward to 2019 and Tesla has a range of vehicular options across multiple price points, from the entry-level Model 3 all the way up to the Model X. Further, Tesla's lineup is poised to expand in the next two years with the impending release of the Model Y, a Tesla pickup truck, the Tesla Semi, and the company's next-gen Roadster.
With Tesla now a company that is, dare I say, mature, investors are now more focused on how profitable the company can be. Tesla, in turn, is now more focused on its bottom line than ever before. To this point, the company just a few days ago announced that it would be slashing its workforce by 7% as part of a broader effort to boost profits. What's more, the company recently upped the prices at its Supercharger stations across the world, with some locations seeing an increase as high as 33%.
While free Supercharger access used to be an alluring incentive for new Tesla owners, Tesla has slowly phased that out as the number of Tesla vehicles on the road has exploded.
In a statement on the price increase provided to Electrek, a Tesla spokesperson explained:

We’re adjusting Supercharging pricing to better reflect differences in local electricity costs and site usage. As our fleet grows, we continue to open new Supercharger locations weekly so more drivers can travel long distances at a fraction of the cost of gasoline and with zero emissions. As has always been the case, Supercharging is not meant to be a profit center for Tesla.

Put simply, Tesla may not be looking to turn a profit from its Supercharger stations, but it doesn't want to lose money on it either. All told, it's still cheaper to recharge a Tesla -- even with the price increase -- than it is to fill up a traditional car with gas.
Incidentally, Elon Musk a few months ago said that Tesla has plans to significantly expand the reach of its Supercharger network by the end of 2019 and that 95% to 100% of people in “active markets” will be “within range” of a charging station before 2020.
Tesla is in the midst of an interesting transition these days. Just a few years ago, the company had to prove that it could market an EVs to the masses. And with the release of the award-winning Model S a few years ago, Tesla did just that. Flash forward to 2019 and Tesla has a range of vehicular options across multiple price points, from the entry-level Model 3 all the way up to the Model X. Further, Tesla's lineup is poised to expand in the next two years with the impending release of the Model Y, a Tesla pickup truck, the Tesla Semi, and the company's next-gen Roadster.
With Tesla now a company that is, dare I say, mature, investors are now more focused on how profitable the company can be. Tesla, in turn, is now more focused on its bottom line than ever before. To this point, the company just a few days ago announced that it would be slashing its workforce by 7% as part of a broader effort to boost profits. What's more, the company recently upped the prices at its Supercharger stations across the world, with some locations seeing an increase as high as 33%.
While free Supercharger access used to be an alluring incentive for new Tesla owners, Tesla has slowly phased that out as the number of Tesla vehicles on the road has exploded.
In a statement on the price increase provided to Electrek, a Tesla spokesperson explained:

We’re adjusting Supercharging pricing to better reflect differences in local electricity costs and site usage. As our fleet grows, we continue to open new Supercharger locations weekly so more drivers can travel long distances at a fraction of the cost of gasoline and with zero emissions. As has always been the case, Supercharging is not meant to be a profit center for Tesla.

Put simply, Tesla may not be looking to turn a profit from its Supercharger stations, but it doesn't want to lose money on it either. All told, it's still cheaper to recharge a Tesla -- even with the price increase -- than it is to fill up a traditional car with gas.
Incidentally, Elon Musk a few months ago said that Tesla has plans to significantly expand the reach of its Supercharger network by the end of 2019 and that 95% to 100% of people in “active markets” will be “within range” of a charging station before 2020.

Tesla is in the midst of an interesting transition these days. Just a few years ago, the company had to prove that it could market an EVs to the masses. And with the release of the award-winning Model S a few years ago, Tesla did just that. Flash forward to 2019 and Tesla has a range of vehicular options across multiple price points, from the entry-level Model 3 all the way up to the Model X. Further, Tesla’s lineup is poised to expand in the next two years with the impending release of the Model Y, a Tesla pickup truck, the Tesla Semi, and the company’s next-gen Roadster.

With Tesla now a company that is, dare I say, mature, investors are now more focused on how profitable the company can be. Tesla, in turn, is now more focused on its bottom line than ever before. To this point, the company just a few days ago announced that it would be slashing its workforce by 7% as part of a broader effort to boost profits. What’s more, the company recently upped the prices at its Supercharger stations across the world, with some locations seeing an increase as high as 33%.

While free Supercharger access used to be an alluring incentive for new Tesla owners, Tesla has slowly phased that out as the number of Tesla vehicles on the road has exploded.

In a statement on the price increase provided to Electrek, a Tesla spokesperson explained:

We’re adjusting Supercharging pricing to better reflect differences in local electricity costs and site usage. As our fleet grows, we continue to open new Supercharger locations weekly so more drivers can travel long distances at a fraction of the cost of gasoline and with zero emissions. As has always been the case, Supercharging is not meant to be a profit center for Tesla.

Put simply, Tesla may not be looking to turn a profit from its Supercharger stations, but it doesn’t want to lose money on it either. All told, it’s still cheaper to recharge a Tesla — even with the price increase — than it is to fill up a traditional car with gas.

Incidentally, Elon Musk a few months ago said that Tesla has plans to significantly expand the reach of its Supercharger network by the end of 2019 and that 95% to 100% of people in “active markets” will be “within range” of a charging station before 2020.

]]>
Enjoy a billion years of Moon impacts in just one minutehttps://bgr.com/2019/01/21/moon-crater-time-lapse-video/
http://bgr.com/?p=56917112019-01-21T19:05:57+00:00Mike Wehner
recent research data that reveals the approximate age of over 100 of the Moon's many impact sites, System Sounds created a fantastic time lapse video that condenses well over a billion years of Moon impacts into a brief but stunning animation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANYxkwvb8pc
The video begins its countdown over 1.3 billion years ago, showing the lunar impact sites appearing all over the Moon's surface. Along with the spinning Moon and colorful craters that appear as the video progresses, sounds have been assigned to each impact based on their size. The larger the impact, the deeper the musical note associated with it.
"The craters were dated by studying how fast the ejected material cools during the lunar nighttime," System Sounds explains in the video's description. "The debris from older craters has crumbled more over time and the smaller pieces are able to cool very fast. Younger craters are still surrounded by ejected boulders which stay warmer for longer."
Without weather systems or large quantities of liquid water on its surface, the Moon provides ideal conditions for impact craters to remain visible for hundreds of millions or even billions of years. On Earth, smaller impact sites are erased relatively quickly, with only the largest craters sticking around for us to find. Determining when the Moon was under bombardment from space rocks can help scientists produce a similar timeline for Earth, even without finding the craters here on our home planet.]]>

Enjoy a billion years of Moon impacts in just one minute

Science

super moon tonight

Earth's Moon might seem a bit boring when viewing it with the naked eye, with its monochrome surface and blurry patches revealing little from afar, but its landscape is anything but featureless. We've all seen high-resolution photos of the Moon and seen its countless craters frozen in time, wondering where they came from and how long they've been there.
Using recent research data that reveals the approximate age of over 100 of the Moon's many impact sites, System Sounds created a fantastic time lapse video that condenses well over a billion years of Moon impacts into a brief but stunning animation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANYxkwvb8pc
The video begins its countdown over 1.3 billion years ago, showing the lunar impact sites appearing all over the Moon's surface. Along with the spinning Moon and colorful craters that appear as the video progresses, sounds have been assigned to each impact based on their size. The larger the impact, the deeper the musical note associated with it.
"The craters were dated by studying how fast the ejected material cools during the lunar nighttime," System Sounds explains in the video's description. "The debris from older craters has crumbled more over time and the smaller pieces are able to cool very fast. Younger craters are still surrounded by ejected boulders which stay warmer for longer."
Without weather systems or large quantities of liquid water on its surface, the Moon provides ideal conditions for impact craters to remain visible for hundreds of millions or even billions of years. On Earth, smaller impact sites are erased relatively quickly, with only the largest craters sticking around for us to find. Determining when the Moon was under bombardment from space rocks can help scientists produce a similar timeline for Earth, even without finding the craters here on our home planet.
Earth's Moon might seem a bit boring when viewing it with the naked eye, with its monochrome surface and blurry patches revealing little from afar, but its landscape is anything but featureless. We've all seen high-resolution photos of the Moon and seen its countless craters frozen in time, wondering where they came from and how long they've been there.
Using recent research data that reveals the approximate age of over 100 of the Moon's many impact sites, System Sounds created a fantastic time lapse video that condenses well over a billion years of Moon impacts into a brief but stunning animation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANYxkwvb8pc
The video begins its countdown over 1.3 billion years ago, showing the lunar impact sites appearing all over the Moon's surface. Along with the spinning Moon and colorful craters that appear as the video progresses, sounds have been assigned to each impact based on their size. The larger the impact, the deeper the musical note associated with it.
"The craters were dated by studying how fast the ejected material cools during the lunar nighttime," System Sounds explains in the video's description. "The debris from older craters has crumbled more over time and the smaller pieces are able to cool very fast. Younger craters are still surrounded by ejected boulders which stay warmer for longer."
Without weather systems or large quantities of liquid water on its surface, the Moon provides ideal conditions for impact craters to remain visible for hundreds of millions or even billions of years. On Earth, smaller impact sites are erased relatively quickly, with only the largest craters sticking around for us to find. Determining when the Moon was under bombardment from space rocks can help scientists produce a similar timeline for Earth, even without finding the craters here on our home planet.

Earth’s Moon might seem a bit boring when viewing it with the naked eye, with its monochrome surface and blurry patches revealing little from afar, but its landscape is anything but featureless. We’ve all seen high-resolution photos of the Moon and seen its countless craters frozen in time, wondering where they came from and how long they’ve been there.

Using recent research data that reveals the approximate age of over 100 of the Moon’s many impact sites, System Sounds created a fantastic time lapse video that condenses well over a billion years of Moon impacts into a brief but stunning animation.

The video begins its countdown over 1.3 billion years ago, showing the lunar impact sites appearing all over the Moon’s surface. Along with the spinning Moon and colorful craters that appear as the video progresses, sounds have been assigned to each impact based on their size. The larger the impact, the deeper the musical note associated with it.

“The craters were dated by studying how fast the ejected material cools during the lunar nighttime,” System Sounds explains in the video’s description. “The debris from older craters has crumbled more over time and the smaller pieces are able to cool very fast. Younger craters are still surrounded by ejected boulders which stay warmer for longer.”

Without weather systems or large quantities of liquid water on its surface, the Moon provides ideal conditions for impact craters to remain visible for hundreds of millions or even billions of years. On Earth, smaller impact sites are erased relatively quickly, with only the largest craters sticking around for us to find. Determining when the Moon was under bombardment from space rocks can help scientists produce a similar timeline for Earth, even without finding the craters here on our home planet.

]]>
Super popular Bluetooth earbuds with great sound and 9-hour battery life are only $16 todayhttps://bgr.com/2019/01/21/bluetooth-earbuds-on-sale-on-amazon-taotronics/
http://bgr.com/?p=56917292019-01-21T18:46:18+00:00Maren Estrada
TaoTronics Wireless Sport Earphones are among the most popular models on Amazon, which isn't very shocking when you consider that they offer great sound quality and 9-hour battery life for just $24. Pick up a pair today though, and you'll only pay $15.99 when you use the coupon code OY88FQCI at checkout!
Here are some key details from the product page:

Splash Proof Build: Nano coating protects the earphones when exercising and during rain

Super popular Bluetooth earbuds with great sound and 9-hour battery life are only $16 today

Audio

TaoTronics-Wireless-4.2-Magnetic-Earbuds

Today is the day you've been waiting for if you're on the looking for surprisingly good wireless earbuds at a surprisingly low price. The TaoTronics Wireless Sport Earphones are among the most popular models on Amazon, which isn't very shocking when you consider that they offer great sound quality and 9-hour battery life for just $24. Pick up a pair today though, and you'll only pay $15.99 when you use the coupon code OY88FQCI at checkout!
Here are some key details from the product page:

Splash Proof Build: Nano coating protects the earphones when exercising and during rain

Secure Magnetic Design: Magnets prevent the headphones from sliding off when not in use, just hang around your neck

Today is the day you've been waiting for if you're on the looking for surprisingly good wireless earbuds at a surprisingly low price. The TaoTronics Wireless Sport Earphones are among the most popular models on Amazon, which isn't very shocking when you consider that they offer great sound quality and 9-hour battery life for just $24. Pick up a pair today though, and you'll only pay $15.99 when you use the coupon code OY88FQCI at checkout!
Here are some key details from the product page:

Splash Proof Build: Nano coating protects the earphones when exercising and during rain

Secure Magnetic Design: Magnets prevent the headphones from sliding off when not in use, just hang around your neck

Today is the day you’ve been waiting for if you’re on the looking for surprisingly good wireless earbuds at a surprisingly low price. The TaoTronics Wireless Sport Earphones are among the most popular models on Amazon, which isn’t very shocking when you consider that they offer great sound quality and 9-hour battery life for just $24. Pick up a pair today though, and you’ll only pay $15.99 when you use the coupon code OY88FQCI at checkout!

Here are some key details from the product page:

Splash Proof Build: Nano coating protects the earphones when exercising and during rain

Secure Magnetic Design: Magnets prevent the headphones from sliding off when not in use, just hang around your neck

]]>
Sophie Turner has already told people how ‘Game of Thrones’ ends, but it still hasn’t leakedhttps://bgr.com/2019/01/21/game-of-thrones-season-8-finale-sophie-turner-spoiled-the-ending/
http://bgr.com/?p=56917272019-01-21T18:27:44+00:00Chris Smith
a firm release date for the first episode of Game of Thrones season 8, and we’re waiting for the first full trailer for the final season. But somebody out there won’t have to wait for the hit HBO show to premiere, because they already know how it all ends. It turns out that Sophie Turner, who plays Sansa Stark on the show, has already shared the ending with a few people. However, she says it’s not a real leak and the details she shared will never make it to the public.
Before season 6 premiered a few years ago, Game of Thrones showrunners asked Kit Harington to play a role in real life. He was supposed to be “an actor who departed a series that’s become a worldwide sensation,” to preserve the Jon Snow resurrection secret.
“Sorry!” Harington said at the time. “I’d like to say sorry for lying to everyone. I’m glad that people were upset that he died. I think my biggest fear was that people were not going to care. Or it would just be, ‘Fine, Jon Snow’s dead.’ But it seems like people had a, similar to the Red Wedding episode, kind of grief about it. Which means something I’m doing — or the show is doing — is right.”
Harington kept that secret. Probably, for The Watch. One could argue that the end of season 8 is even more important than the revelation that Snow didn’t die the first time around. But Turner did tell a few trusted people how HBO’s saga ends.
“Terrified,” Turner answered when W Magazine asked whether she’s scared of keeping secrets like that. “I’m so bad at keeping secrets. I don’t think people tell me things anymore because they know that I can’t keep them. I’ve already told the ending of Game of Thrones to a few people.”
Turner wasn’t drunk when she did it, either. “Nope, sober,” she said. “I was like, ‘Hey if you want to know, I’ll tell you.’ But it’s people that I know, not random people. It’s people that I know will keep the secret.”
That settles it. People who didn’t work on the show know how Game of Thrones ends, but there's no way they're spoiling it for the rest of us. April 14th can’t come soon enough.]]>

Sophie Turner has already told people how ‘Game of Thrones’ ends, but it still hasn’t leaked

Entertainment

Game of Thrones S07E07

We already have a firm release date for the first episode of Game of Thrones season 8, and we’re waiting for the first full trailer for the final season. But somebody out there won’t have to wait for the hit HBO show to premiere, because they already know how it all ends. It turns out that Sophie Turner, who plays Sansa Stark on the show, has already shared the ending with a few people. However, she says it’s not a real leak and the details she shared will never make it to the public.
Before season 6 premiered a few years ago, Game of Thrones showrunners asked Kit Harington to play a role in real life. He was supposed to be “an actor who departed a series that’s become a worldwide sensation,” to preserve the Jon Snow resurrection secret.
“Sorry!” Harington said at the time. “I’d like to say sorry for lying to everyone. I’m glad that people were upset that he died. I think my biggest fear was that people were not going to care. Or it would just be, ‘Fine, Jon Snow’s dead.’ But it seems like people had a, similar to the Red Wedding episode, kind of grief about it. Which means something I’m doing — or the show is doing — is right.”
Harington kept that secret. Probably, for The Watch. One could argue that the end of season 8 is even more important than the revelation that Snow didn’t die the first time around. But Turner did tell a few trusted people how HBO’s saga ends.
“Terrified,” Turner answered when W Magazine asked whether she’s scared of keeping secrets like that. “I’m so bad at keeping secrets. I don’t think people tell me things anymore because they know that I can’t keep them. I’ve already told the ending of Game of Thrones to a few people.”
Turner wasn’t drunk when she did it, either. “Nope, sober,” she said. “I was like, ‘Hey if you want to know, I’ll tell you.’ But it’s people that I know, not random people. It’s people that I know will keep the secret.”
That settles it. People who didn’t work on the show know how Game of Thrones ends, but there's no way they're spoiling it for the rest of us. April 14th can’t come soon enough.
We already have a firm release date for the first episode of Game of Thrones season 8, and we’re waiting for the first full trailer for the final season. But somebody out there won’t have to wait for the hit HBO show to premiere, because they already know how it all ends. It turns out that Sophie Turner, who plays Sansa Stark on the show, has already shared the ending with a few people. However, she says it’s not a real leak and the details she shared will never make it to the public.
Before season 6 premiered a few years ago, Game of Thrones showrunners asked Kit Harington to play a role in real life. He was supposed to be “an actor who departed a series that’s become a worldwide sensation,” to preserve the Jon Snow resurrection secret.
“Sorry!” Harington said at the time. “I’d like to say sorry for lying to everyone. I’m glad that people were upset that he died. I think my biggest fear was that people were not going to care. Or it would just be, ‘Fine, Jon Snow’s dead.’ But it seems like people had a, similar to the Red Wedding episode, kind of grief about it. Which means something I’m doing — or the show is doing — is right.”
Harington kept that secret. Probably, for The Watch. One could argue that the end of season 8 is even more important than the revelation that Snow didn’t die the first time around. But Turner did tell a few trusted people how HBO’s saga ends.
“Terrified,” Turner answered when W Magazine asked whether she’s scared of keeping secrets like that. “I’m so bad at keeping secrets. I don’t think people tell me things anymore because they know that I can’t keep them. I’ve already told the ending of Game of Thrones to a few people.”
Turner wasn’t drunk when she did it, either. “Nope, sober,” she said. “I was like, ‘Hey if you want to know, I’ll tell you.’ But it’s people that I know, not random people. It’s people that I know will keep the secret.”
That settles it. People who didn’t work on the show know how Game of Thrones ends, but there's no way they're spoiling it for the rest of us. April 14th can’t come soon enough.

Before season 6 premiered a few years ago, Game of Thrones showrunners asked Kit Harington to play a role in real life. He was supposed to be “an actor who departed a series that’s become a worldwide sensation,” to preserve the Jon Snow resurrection secret.

“Sorry!” Harington said at the time. “I’d like to say sorry for lying to everyone. I’m glad that people were upset that he died. I think my biggest fear was that people were not going to care. Or it would just be, ‘Fine, Jon Snow’s dead.’ But it seems like people had a, similar to the Red Wedding episode, kind of grief about it. Which means something I’m doing — or the show is doing — is right.”

Harington kept that secret. Probably, for The Watch. One could argue that the end of season 8 is even more important than the revelation that Snow didn’t die the first time around. But Turner did tell a few trusted people how HBO’s saga ends.

“Terrified,” Turner answered when W Magazine asked whether she’s scared of keeping secrets like that. “I’m so bad at keeping secrets. I don’t think people tell me things anymore because they know that I can’t keep them. I’ve already told the ending of Game of Thrones to a few people.”

Turner wasn’t drunk when she did it, either. “Nope, sober,” she said. “I was like, ‘Hey if you want to know, I’ll tell you.’ But it’s people that I know, not random people. It’s people that I know will keep the secret.”

That settles it. People who didn’t work on the show know how Game of Thrones ends, but there’s no way they’re spoiling it for the rest of us. April 14th can’t come soon enough.

]]>
Amazon has the AirPods wireless charging case Apple never released for $37https://bgr.com/2019/01/21/airpods-wireless-charging-case-discounted-amazon/
http://bgr.com/?p=56915692019-01-21T18:08:43+00:00Maren Estrada
NeotrixQI AirPods Wireless Charger Case replaces the carrying case that came with your AirPods. It looks a lot like the original case, but there’s one key difference that you’ve likely surmised by now: it supports wireless charging! It’s available right now on Amazon for $36.99 and we definitely recommend it to all the AirPods users out there.
Here’s what you need to know from the product page:

PERFECT AirPods CHARGING CASE REPLACEMENT - It is a great replacement case if you lost your original Airpods charging case or forget to carry your AirPods charging case.Do not worried about your earbuds out of power and enjoy music anytime anywhere.

SUPPORT Qi WIRELESS CHARGERS - Compatible with all Qi standard wiress charger and no more any incompatible issues.It will not damage your original Airpods then make your Airpods use last long time.

WIRED CHARGING - The Charging case can be charged by your cable if you didn't have a wireless charger.

BUILT IN BATTERY - It built in lightweight 450mAh battery and supply over 5 times full charge for your Airpods earbuds.Just 15 minutes provide you 3 hour of listening time.

WARRANTY - NeotrixQI AirPods charging case replacement with short circuit,over voltage,over current and over charge protection.Refund or replacement are all supported within 1 year,any questions will be appreciated.

]]>

Amazon has the AirPods wireless charging case Apple never released for $37

Accessories

apple-airpods

Some day, Apple might finally released the AirPods wireless charging case that it announced all the way back in September 2017. Until then, we’re all left fumbling with cables and plugging in our AirPods to charge. Well, not all of us. The NeotrixQI AirPods Wireless Charger Case replaces the carrying case that came with your AirPods. It looks a lot like the original case, but there’s one key difference that you’ve likely surmised by now: it supports wireless charging! It’s available right now on Amazon for $36.99 and we definitely recommend it to all the AirPods users out there.
Here’s what you need to know from the product page:

PERFECT AirPods CHARGING CASE REPLACEMENT - It is a great replacement case if you lost your original Airpods charging case or forget to carry your AirPods charging case.Do not worried about your earbuds out of power and enjoy music anytime anywhere.

SUPPORT Qi WIRELESS CHARGERS - Compatible with all Qi standard wiress charger and no more any incompatible issues.It will not damage your original Airpods then make your Airpods use last long time.

WIRED CHARGING - The Charging case can be charged by your cable if you didn't have a wireless charger.

BUILT IN BATTERY - It built in lightweight 450mAh battery and supply over 5 times full charge for your Airpods earbuds.Just 15 minutes provide you 3 hour of listening time.

WARRANTY - NeotrixQI AirPods charging case replacement with short circuit,over voltage,over current and over charge protection.Refund or replacement are all supported within 1 year,any questions will be appreciated.

Some day, Apple might finally released the AirPods wireless charging case that it announced all the way back in September 2017. Until then, we’re all left fumbling with cables and plugging in our AirPods to charge. Well, not all of us. The NeotrixQI AirPods Wireless Charger Case replaces the carrying case that came with your AirPods. It looks a lot like the original case, but there’s one key difference that you’ve likely surmised by now: it supports wireless charging! It’s available right now on Amazon for $36.99 and we definitely recommend it to all the AirPods users out there.
Here’s what you need to know from the product page:

PERFECT AirPods CHARGING CASE REPLACEMENT - It is a great replacement case if you lost your original Airpods charging case or forget to carry your AirPods charging case.Do not worried about your earbuds out of power and enjoy music anytime anywhere.

SUPPORT Qi WIRELESS CHARGERS - Compatible with all Qi standard wiress charger and no more any incompatible issues.It will not damage your original Airpods then make your Airpods use last long time.

WIRED CHARGING - The Charging case can be charged by your cable if you didn't have a wireless charger.

BUILT IN BATTERY - It built in lightweight 450mAh battery and supply over 5 times full charge for your Airpods earbuds.Just 15 minutes provide you 3 hour of listening time.

WARRANTY - NeotrixQI AirPods charging case replacement with short circuit,over voltage,over current and over charge protection.Refund or replacement are all supported within 1 year,any questions will be appreciated.

Some day, Apple might finally released the AirPods wireless charging case that it announced all the way back in September 2017. Until then, we’re all left fumbling with cables and plugging in our AirPods to charge. Well, not all of us. The NeotrixQI AirPods Wireless Charger Case replaces the carrying case that came with your AirPods. It looks a lot like the original case, but there’s one key difference that you’ve likely surmised by now: it supports wireless charging! It’s available right now on Amazon for $36.99 and we definitely recommend it to all the AirPods users out there.

Here’s what you need to know from the product page:

PERFECT AirPods CHARGING CASE REPLACEMENT – It is a great replacement case if you lost your original Airpods charging case or forget to carry your AirPods charging case.Do not worried about your earbuds out of power and enjoy music anytime anywhere.

SUPPORT Qi WIRELESS CHARGERS – Compatible with all Qi standard wiress charger and no more any incompatible issues.It will not damage your original Airpods then make your Airpods use last long time.

WIRED CHARGING – The Charging case can be charged by your cable if you didn’t have a wireless charger.

BUILT IN BATTERY – It built in lightweight 450mAh battery and supply over 5 times full charge for your Airpods earbuds.Just 15 minutes provide you 3 hour of listening time.

WARRANTY – NeotrixQI AirPods charging case replacement with short circuit,over voltage,over current and over charge protection.Refund or replacement are all supported within 1 year,any questions will be appreciated.

]]>
This might be our first look at Motorola’s new design for a RAZR with a foldable displayhttps://bgr.com/2019/01/21/motorola-razr-foldable-display-leaked-pictures-details/
http://bgr.com/?p=56917022019-01-21T17:30:52+00:00Jacob Siegal
the Wall Street Journal reported that Lenovo (which acquired Motorola's smartphone business in 2014) is planning to revive the RAZR brand with a $1,500 foldable smartphone in 2019. Today, 91mobiles has followed up on WSJ's report with the discovery of a patent that seems to showcase the foldable RAZR.
The word "RAZR" never actually appears in said patent, but Motorola Mobility is listed as the name of the applicant, and the design of the device pictured in the patent looks virtually identical to the RAZR V3 from 2004.
Based on the images contained within the patent, the most significant change from the original to the revival is the tall display, which stretches from the top of the phone all the way down the chin when the phone is flipped open. With the flexible screen, it will be possible to flip the phone shut, and when closed, the phone looks staggering similar to the RAZR V3 (albeit somewhat more squat than the original, with more of a square shape).
The foldable RAZR also appears to retain a secondary screen on the top half of the back panel, similar to the CTSN screen that was featured on the old RAZR V3. There looks to be a camera just below the front-facing display, while a fingerprint sensor adorns the lower half of the back panel. So while the look of the new RAZR hearkens back to the early 2000s, the feature set will be more in line with the phones currently on the market.
Going by the WSJ report, Lenovo plans to produce just 200,000 units of the new RAZR, and charge around $1,500. The report also claims that the foldable RAZR could launch as early as next month, but if that's the case, we should expect to receive official confirmation of its existence in the very near future.]]>

This might be our first look at Motorola’s new design for a RAZR with a foldable display

Mobile

foldable-razr

2019 should be a banner year for smartphone design, as phone makers continue to look for new and novel ways to kill the bezel once and for all. Samsung's Galaxy S10 line will lead the charge with its Infinity-O display, which trades the notch for a hole in the corner of the screen where the camera resides, but we're also going to see the first mass-produced devices with foldable displays this year. And a new RAZR could be among them.
Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that Lenovo (which acquired Motorola's smartphone business in 2014) is planning to revive the RAZR brand with a $1,500 foldable smartphone in 2019. Today, 91mobiles has followed up on WSJ's report with the discovery of a patent that seems to showcase the foldable RAZR.
The word "RAZR" never actually appears in said patent, but Motorola Mobility is listed as the name of the applicant, and the design of the device pictured in the patent looks virtually identical to the RAZR V3 from 2004.
Based on the images contained within the patent, the most significant change from the original to the revival is the tall display, which stretches from the top of the phone all the way down the chin when the phone is flipped open. With the flexible screen, it will be possible to flip the phone shut, and when closed, the phone looks staggering similar to the RAZR V3 (albeit somewhat more squat than the original, with more of a square shape).
The foldable RAZR also appears to retain a secondary screen on the top half of the back panel, similar to the CTSN screen that was featured on the old RAZR V3. There looks to be a camera just below the front-facing display, while a fingerprint sensor adorns the lower half of the back panel. So while the look of the new RAZR hearkens back to the early 2000s, the feature set will be more in line with the phones currently on the market.
Going by the WSJ report, Lenovo plans to produce just 200,000 units of the new RAZR, and charge around $1,500. The report also claims that the foldable RAZR could launch as early as next month, but if that's the case, we should expect to receive official confirmation of its existence in the very near future.
2019 should be a banner year for smartphone design, as phone makers continue to look for new and novel ways to kill the bezel once and for all. Samsung's Galaxy S10 line will lead the charge with its Infinity-O display, which trades the notch for a hole in the corner of the screen where the camera resides, but we're also going to see the first mass-produced devices with foldable displays this year. And a new RAZR could be among them.
Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that Lenovo (which acquired Motorola's smartphone business in 2014) is planning to revive the RAZR brand with a $1,500 foldable smartphone in 2019. Today, 91mobiles has followed up on WSJ's report with the discovery of a patent that seems to showcase the foldable RAZR.
The word "RAZR" never actually appears in said patent, but Motorola Mobility is listed as the name of the applicant, and the design of the device pictured in the patent looks virtually identical to the RAZR V3 from 2004.
Based on the images contained within the patent, the most significant change from the original to the revival is the tall display, which stretches from the top of the phone all the way down the chin when the phone is flipped open. With the flexible screen, it will be possible to flip the phone shut, and when closed, the phone looks staggering similar to the RAZR V3 (albeit somewhat more squat than the original, with more of a square shape).
The foldable RAZR also appears to retain a secondary screen on the top half of the back panel, similar to the CTSN screen that was featured on the old RAZR V3. There looks to be a camera just below the front-facing display, while a fingerprint sensor adorns the lower half of the back panel. So while the look of the new RAZR hearkens back to the early 2000s, the feature set will be more in line with the phones currently on the market.
Going by the WSJ report, Lenovo plans to produce just 200,000 units of the new RAZR, and charge around $1,500. The report also claims that the foldable RAZR could launch as early as next month, but if that's the case, we should expect to receive official confirmation of its existence in the very near future.

2019 should be a banner year for smartphone design, as phone makers continue to look for new and novel ways to kill the bezel once and for all. Samsung’s Galaxy S10 line will lead the charge with its Infinity-O display, which trades the notch for a hole in the corner of the screen where the camera resides, but we’re also going to see the first mass-produced devices with foldable displays this year. And a new RAZR could be among them.

Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that Lenovo (which acquired Motorola’s smartphone business in 2014) is planning to revive the RAZR brand with a $1,500 foldable smartphone in 2019. Today, 91mobiles has followed up on WSJ’s report with the discovery of a patent that seems to showcase the foldable RAZR.

The word “RAZR” never actually appears in said patent, but Motorola Mobility is listed as the name of the applicant, and the design of the device pictured in the patent looks virtually identical to the RAZR V3 from 2004.

Based on the images contained within the patent, the most significant change from the original to the revival is the tall display, which stretches from the top of the phone all the way down the chin when the phone is flipped open. With the flexible screen, it will be possible to flip the phone shut, and when closed, the phone looks staggering similar to the RAZR V3 (albeit somewhat more squat than the original, with more of a square shape).

The foldable RAZR also appears to retain a secondary screen on the top half of the back panel, similar to the CTSN screen that was featured on the old RAZR V3. There looks to be a camera just below the front-facing display, while a fingerprint sensor adorns the lower half of the back panel. So while the look of the new RAZR hearkens back to the early 2000s, the feature set will be more in line with the phones currently on the market.

Going by the WSJ report, Lenovo plans to produce just 200,000 units of the new RAZR, and charge around $1,500. The report also claims that the foldable RAZR could launch as early as next month, but if that’s the case, we should expect to receive official confirmation of its existence in the very near future.

]]>
New ‘Avengers: Endgame’ theory puts a great spin on the time travel plothttps://bgr.com/2019/01/21/avengers-endgame-spoilers-dr-strange-time-travel-plan-to-beat-thanos/
http://bgr.com/?p=56916882019-01-21T17:07:29+00:00Chris Smith
Avengers: Endgame, but we’re reasonably confident that we’ll see time travel in the movie. One or more characters will have to journey to the past to prevent Thanos from killing half of all living things in the known universe. So far, we saw plenty of proof to back up that theory, including leaked photos from the Avengers 4 set that showed several Avengers actors working on scenes that were set during the New York battle from the first Avengers film. We also saw plenty of toy leaks that revealed several Avengers will ditch their regular costumes in favor of special suits that will help them travel to the Quantum Realm.
The most recent toy leak gives us a great look at Thor and Hulk in those suits, while revealing that other Avengers will also join them. With that idea in mind and with the knowledge that time travel is a big part of Endgame, you should check out the following fan theory about the upcoming Marvel movie.
Reddit user fishgrey explains that Dr. Strange’s plan to defeat Thanos is to help Tony Stark build an Infinity Gauntlet-like weapon that would allow the Avengers to win. For that to happen, Strange will send two of the Infinity Stones forward in time to Stark, so the tech genius can learn all of their secrets and create a suit or weapon that can ultimately be used to wield the stones against Thanos and avoid the snap.
To set things in motion and to make sure events play out in a particular order, Strange would have to make sure that Tony survives that battle on Titan, the theory says. Also, Strange would contact Loki in the past at some point to obtain the Tesseract from him. The Tesseract has the Space Stone in it, so he can remove it and send it to Tony:

I believe at some point after Dr. Strange uses the time stone to see 14 million future outcomes, Strange contacts Loki (in the past, via time projection) and explains the imminent danger and his plan to reverse it. (He contacts him either during Infinity wars opening on the Asgardian ship [During Infinity War, Strange contacts Loki during the fight on the Asgardian vessel explaining his plan and prompts Loki to attack Thanos to stall him], or in during/before Thor: Ragnarok [Before Infinity War during Ragnarok, this is why Loki goes out of his way and slightly out of character to grab the Tesseract as they needed it for Strange's plan.])

Once Tony had completed his study of the Stones, the theory says they would be given to Thanos to avoid a time paradox:

So meeting with Loki before he died, Dr. Strange explained his plan (hence Loki's bold statement to Thor). The stones were sent forward in time to Tony to allow him to study the Stones and build his own suit or gauntlet to wield them (we know a leaked Lego set for Endgame is of Tony's build/suit room) once he has completed this, the stones return to Loki and Strange as we see in Infinity War and are thus given to Thanos to avoid a time paradox. This could be why Loki summons the Tesseract in the same way Strange summons the time stone as it is reappearing from the future into the present.

Using the new weapon, the heroes would then embark on a quest to gather the stones and reverse the snap. It’s unclear where they’d collect the stones from, though. But the odds are fairly good that they might have to go back in time to retrieve them.
The Redditor also suggests other ideas that would work together with the theory above. For example, he says the Quantum Realm particles that Ant-Man gathered at the end of Ant-Man and the Wasp may help Tony wield the Stones in some manner. Also, the theory says that Doctor Strange may contact Ant-Man while he's inside the Quantum Realm after the snap, in order to explain the plan. Thanos may be trapped in one of Strange’s time loops while all this happens, with Ant-Man being the only one able to escape it thanks to the Quantum Realm.
Finally, the Redditor has also come up with an idea for a great final battle scene between the heroes and Thanos:

I'm dying to see Cap in a epic final scene wielding Mjolnir in one hand (We know time travel of some kind is present in Endgame, so perhaps Mjolnir will have a cameo) and his shield in the other, or even better Iron Man in his new suit embedded with the stones, wielding Mjolnir (Using the power of the Infinity Stones) whilst defending himself with Cap's shield in the other hand!

Endgame hits theaters on April 26th, so you have plenty of time to check out the full theory below while we wait.
https://www.reddit.com/r/FanTheories/comments/ahxzay/endgame_theory_stranges_plan_and_tonys_final_build/]]>

New ‘Avengers: Endgame’ theory puts a great spin on the time travel plot

Entertainment

Doctor Strange - 2016

We may not have the exact details of what will go down in Avengers: Endgame, but we’re reasonably confident that we’ll see time travel in the movie. One or more characters will have to journey to the past to prevent Thanos from killing half of all living things in the known universe. So far, we saw plenty of proof to back up that theory, including leaked photos from the Avengers 4 set that showed several Avengers actors working on scenes that were set during the New York battle from the first Avengers film. We also saw plenty of toy leaks that revealed several Avengers will ditch their regular costumes in favor of special suits that will help them travel to the Quantum Realm.
The most recent toy leak gives us a great look at Thor and Hulk in those suits, while revealing that other Avengers will also join them. With that idea in mind and with the knowledge that time travel is a big part of Endgame, you should check out the following fan theory about the upcoming Marvel movie.
Reddit user fishgrey explains that Dr. Strange’s plan to defeat Thanos is to help Tony Stark build an Infinity Gauntlet-like weapon that would allow the Avengers to win. For that to happen, Strange will send two of the Infinity Stones forward in time to Stark, so the tech genius can learn all of their secrets and create a suit or weapon that can ultimately be used to wield the stones against Thanos and avoid the snap.
To set things in motion and to make sure events play out in a particular order, Strange would have to make sure that Tony survives that battle on Titan, the theory says. Also, Strange would contact Loki in the past at some point to obtain the Tesseract from him. The Tesseract has the Space Stone in it, so he can remove it and send it to Tony:

I believe at some point after Dr. Strange uses the time stone to see 14 million future outcomes, Strange contacts Loki (in the past, via time projection) and explains the imminent danger and his plan to reverse it. (He contacts him either during Infinity wars opening on the Asgardian ship [During Infinity War, Strange contacts Loki during the fight on the Asgardian vessel explaining his plan and prompts Loki to attack Thanos to stall him], or in during/before Thor: Ragnarok [Before Infinity War during Ragnarok, this is why Loki goes out of his way and slightly out of character to grab the Tesseract as they needed it for Strange's plan.])

Once Tony had completed his study of the Stones, the theory says they would be given to Thanos to avoid a time paradox:

So meeting with Loki before he died, Dr. Strange explained his plan (hence Loki's bold statement to Thor). The stones were sent forward in time to Tony to allow him to study the Stones and build his own suit or gauntlet to wield them (we know a leaked Lego set for Endgame is of Tony's build/suit room) once he has completed this, the stones return to Loki and Strange as we see in Infinity War and are thus given to Thanos to avoid a time paradox. This could be why Loki summons the Tesseract in the same way Strange summons the time stone as it is reappearing from the future into the present.

Using the new weapon, the heroes would then embark on a quest to gather the stones and reverse the snap. It’s unclear where they’d collect the stones from, though. But the odds are fairly good that they might have to go back in time to retrieve them.
The Redditor also suggests other ideas that would work together with the theory above. For example, he says the Quantum Realm particles that Ant-Man gathered at the end of Ant-Man and the Wasp may help Tony wield the Stones in some manner. Also, the theory says that Doctor Strange may contact Ant-Man while he's inside the Quantum Realm after the snap, in order to explain the plan. Thanos may be trapped in one of Strange’s time loops while all this happens, with Ant-Man being the only one able to escape it thanks to the Quantum Realm.
Finally, the Redditor has also come up with an idea for a great final battle scene between the heroes and Thanos:

I'm dying to see Cap in a epic final scene wielding Mjolnir in one hand (We know time travel of some kind is present in Endgame, so perhaps Mjolnir will have a cameo) and his shield in the other, or even better Iron Man in his new suit embedded with the stones, wielding Mjolnir (Using the power of the Infinity Stones) whilst defending himself with Cap's shield in the other hand!

Endgame hits theaters on April 26th, so you have plenty of time to check out the full theory below while we wait.
https://www.reddit.com/r/FanTheories/comments/ahxzay/endgame_theory_stranges_plan_and_tonys_final_build/
We may not have the exact details of what will go down in Avengers: Endgame, but we’re reasonably confident that we’ll see time travel in the movie. One or more characters will have to journey to the past to prevent Thanos from killing half of all living things in the known universe. So far, we saw plenty of proof to back up that theory, including leaked photos from the Avengers 4 set that showed several Avengers actors working on scenes that were set during the New York battle from the first Avengers film. We also saw plenty of toy leaks that revealed several Avengers will ditch their regular costumes in favor of special suits that will help them travel to the Quantum Realm.
The most recent toy leak gives us a great look at Thor and Hulk in those suits, while revealing that other Avengers will also join them. With that idea in mind and with the knowledge that time travel is a big part of Endgame, you should check out the following fan theory about the upcoming Marvel movie.
Reddit user fishgrey explains that Dr. Strange’s plan to defeat Thanos is to help Tony Stark build an Infinity Gauntlet-like weapon that would allow the Avengers to win. For that to happen, Strange will send two of the Infinity Stones forward in time to Stark, so the tech genius can learn all of their secrets and create a suit or weapon that can ultimately be used to wield the stones against Thanos and avoid the snap.
To set things in motion and to make sure events play out in a particular order, Strange would have to make sure that Tony survives that battle on Titan, the theory says. Also, Strange would contact Loki in the past at some point to obtain the Tesseract from him. The Tesseract has the Space Stone in it, so he can remove it and send it to Tony:

I believe at some point after Dr. Strange uses the time stone to see 14 million future outcomes, Strange contacts Loki (in the past, via time projection) and explains the imminent danger and his plan to reverse it. (He contacts him either during Infinity wars opening on the Asgardian ship [During Infinity War, Strange contacts Loki during the fight on the Asgardian vessel explaining his plan and prompts Loki to attack Thanos to stall him], or in during/before Thor: Ragnarok [Before Infinity War during Ragnarok, this is why Loki goes out of his way and slightly out of character to grab the Tesseract as they needed it for Strange's plan.])

Once Tony had completed his study of the Stones, the theory says they would be given to Thanos to avoid a time paradox:

So meeting with Loki before he died, Dr. Strange explained his plan (hence Loki's bold statement to Thor). The stones were sent forward in time to Tony to allow him to study the Stones and build his own suit or gauntlet to wield them (we know a leaked Lego set for Endgame is of Tony's build/suit room) once he has completed this, the stones return to Loki and Strange as we see in Infinity War and are thus given to Thanos to avoid a time paradox. This could be why Loki summons the Tesseract in the same way Strange summons the time stone as it is reappearing from the future into the present.

Using the new weapon, the heroes would then embark on a quest to gather the stones and reverse the snap. It’s unclear where they’d collect the stones from, though. But the odds are fairly good that they might have to go back in time to retrieve them.
The Redditor also suggests other ideas that would work together with the theory above. For example, he says the Quantum Realm particles that Ant-Man gathered at the end of Ant-Man and the Wasp may help Tony wield the Stones in some manner. Also, the theory says that Doctor Strange may contact Ant-Man while he's inside the Quantum Realm after the snap, in order to explain the plan. Thanos may be trapped in one of Strange’s time loops while all this happens, with Ant-Man being the only one able to escape it thanks to the Quantum Realm.
Finally, the Redditor has also come up with an idea for a great final battle scene between the heroes and Thanos:

I'm dying to see Cap in a epic final scene wielding Mjolnir in one hand (We know time travel of some kind is present in Endgame, so perhaps Mjolnir will have a cameo) and his shield in the other, or even better Iron Man in his new suit embedded with the stones, wielding Mjolnir (Using the power of the Infinity Stones) whilst defending himself with Cap's shield in the other hand!

Endgame hits theaters on April 26th, so you have plenty of time to check out the full theory below while we wait.
https://www.reddit.com/r/FanTheories/comments/ahxzay/endgame_theory_stranges_plan_and_tonys_final_build/

We may not have the exact details of what will go down in Avengers: Endgame, but we’re reasonably confident that we’ll see time travel in the movie. One or more characters will have to journey to the past to prevent Thanos from killing half of all living things in the known universe. So far, we saw plenty of proof to back up that theory, including leaked photos from the Avengers 4 set that showed several Avengers actors working on scenes that were set during the New York battle from the first Avengers film. We also saw plenty of toy leaks that revealed several Avengers will ditch their regular costumes in favor of special suits that will help them travel to the Quantum Realm.

The most recent toy leak gives us a great look at Thor and Hulk in those suits, while revealing that other Avengers will also join them. With that idea in mind and with the knowledge that time travel is a big part of Endgame, you should check out the following fan theory about the upcoming Marvel movie.

Reddit user fishgrey explains that Dr. Strange’s plan to defeat Thanos is to help Tony Stark build an Infinity Gauntlet-like weapon that would allow the Avengers to win. For that to happen, Strange will send two of the Infinity Stones forward in time to Stark, so the tech genius can learn all of their secrets and create a suit or weapon that can ultimately be used to wield the stones against Thanos and avoid the snap.

To set things in motion and to make sure events play out in a particular order, Strange would have to make sure that Tony survives that battle on Titan, the theory says. Also, Strange would contact Loki in the past at some point to obtain the Tesseract from him. The Tesseract has the Space Stone in it, so he can remove it and send it to Tony:

I believe at some point after Dr. Strange uses the time stone to see 14 million future outcomes, Strange contacts Loki (in the past, via time projection) and explains the imminent danger and his plan to reverse it. (He contacts him either during Infinity wars opening on the Asgardian ship [During Infinity War, Strange contacts Loki during the fight on the Asgardian vessel explaining his plan and prompts Loki to attack Thanos to stall him], or in during/before Thor: Ragnarok [Before Infinity War during Ragnarok, this is why Loki goes out of his way and slightly out of character to grab the Tesseract as they needed it for Strange’s plan.])

Once Tony had completed his study of the Stones, the theory says they would be given to Thanos to avoid a time paradox:

So meeting with Loki before he died, Dr. Strange explained his plan (hence Loki’s bold statement to Thor). The stones were sent forward in time to Tony to allow him to study the Stones and build his own suit or gauntlet to wield them (we know a leaked Lego set for Endgame is of Tony’s build/suit room) once he has completed this, the stones return to Loki and Strange as we see in Infinity War and are thus given to Thanos to avoid a time paradox. This could be why Loki summons the Tesseract in the same way Strange summons the time stone as it is reappearing from the future into the present.

Using the new weapon, the heroes would then embark on a quest to gather the stones and reverse the snap. It’s unclear where they’d collect the stones from, though. But the odds are fairly good that they might have to go back in time to retrieve them.

The Redditor also suggests other ideas that would work together with the theory above. For example, he says the Quantum Realm particles that Ant-Man gathered at the end of Ant-Man and the Wasp may help Tony wield the Stones in some manner. Also, the theory says that Doctor Strange may contact Ant-Man while he’s inside the Quantum Realm after the snap, in order to explain the plan. Thanos may be trapped in one of Strange’s time loops while all this happens, with Ant-Man being the only one able to escape it thanks to the Quantum Realm.

Finally, the Redditor has also come up with an idea for a great final battle scene between the heroes and Thanos:

I’m dying to see Cap in a epic final scene wielding Mjolnir in one hand (We know time travel of some kind is present in Endgame, so perhaps Mjolnir will have a cameo) and his shield in the other, or even better Iron Man in his new suit embedded with the stones, wielding Mjolnir (Using the power of the Infinity Stones) whilst defending himself with Cap’s shield in the other hand!

Endgame hits theaters on April 26th, so you have plenty of time to check out the full theory below while we wait.

(ENDGAME THEORY) Strange’s plan and Tony’s final build from FanTheories