After email communications failed to get ANYTHING out of his office, other than the standard BS replies, I wrote a letter asking for precise, specific answers to why he was taking the action that he was on the "Sportsmen's Act of 2012".

The modified form letter I received, in return, was a bigger insult that the previous filth his office tried to feed me.

Nothing but, dodgy, ambiguous, aristocratic BS, even making improper assumptions about what I said...

(I had to chop the header off, to get the file size small enough to upload here. It's dated November 29th, 2012, and is on letterhead from his DC office.)