Friday, 21 January 2011

The American pastor Terry Jones who recently threatened to burn a copy of the Koran has been banned from Britain. A Home Office spokesperson said the goverment opposes extremism in all its forms. This is a lie because there was a covenant between the British government and Muslim terrorists as I will show. They claim to believe in freedom of speech and democracy but only if you say and think what they want you to. If you think for yourself or dissent you will be oppressed by he state.

The term “racism” is used to pathologise people who oppose being pushed out of their communities by the masses of immigrants the elites are importing. It implies there is something wrong in our minds. It is as if we have caught a disease and they must stop it spreading. They use pejoratives to put us in quarantine, to keep others away from us and contain the spread of something considered dangerous. They are now investigating 3-year olds for signs of this illness developing. (1). They want to know how it we caught it and they warn others to take precautions against catching it.

The elites use words ideologically and label people as haters, racists – use words as weapons. They give opponents a bad name like warning people of a dog that bites so no one will touch it.

They have conflated hatred with prudence. If one does not want too many immigrants in they are accused of hating them. If you object to masses of foreigners immigrating they say its because you are xenophobic. This is to suggest you are some horrible person who hates them all. This cows people and instead of parents using their traditional inherited prejudices to warn their children to keep away from ethnic minorities in the wake of widespread Muslim gang rapes of young girls they condition them to think the ethics are all nice and benefitting their lives.

People should realise these definitions like “racist”, “xenophobe” or “hater” are not some objective truth but ideologically-loaded words coined by interest groups to get people to surrender to immigrants who are being used to undercut the wages of indigenous people and make the elites feel morally superior even though they themselves live apart from it. It works like a censor in the head to stop certain natural thoughts and behaviour traits. The term “racism” is used by people to control us or to silenceour objections to being pushed out of our communities. It was made up by somebody.

The “experts” and Establishment intellectuals describe the violated girls as vulnerable to shift the focus on to the victims instead of the perpetrators - to exhonerate Muslims; but these rapes of young girls are attacks on them, not self-inflicted. The focus must be kept on the attackers and not let the duplicitous elites pass it from their pets to raped young girls.

It is an indictment on us as a whole that these young girls are out wandering around and not being protected.

In a recent essay I referred to the academics who changed our ethnocentrism to othercentrism: the shift of focus from ourselves to looking up to other ethnic groups and immigrnts as bearers of virtue and cultural enrichment who are improving our lives or coming to look after us. This is at the root of this Act of War because to Muslims we are “other” or the “outgroup”. They dehumanise us with terms like infidel and kuffar.

These abuses would not happen if we had retained our traditional prejudices against foreigners and if we asserted ourselves. Instead all we have is girly and corrupt elites covering up for the alien child-rapists. Once this came out after years of covering it up the elites immediately started trying to deceive us by talking it away and trying to say “Whites “ are as bad when this is actually ethnic guerilla war on our communities by a rival community.

We have to work on regaining our confidence and value our selves, our culture, history and traditions not apologise to outsiders. Our customs, notions of right and wrong were inherited and passed down as moral guidance by the parents but have been taken out of their hands by the state. Where the parents should be advising their children to keep away from ethnics the schools are telling them to mix with them and there lives will be improved. That is why these children go with Muslim: they have been trained to think they are nice and bringing enrichment: the teachers are destroying the children's natural defences. The parents are unsure of themselves because the advice they get from “experts” contradicts their own common sense.

Some think we need a philosophy. Well, here is a brief interlude. We do not only have rights we have duties that go with them. The colloquial expression “by rights” retains this sense. People say “By rights you should receive or do so and so.” It means “By all that is right” which includes obligations. Rights did not just mean rights to do things it also included duty. These were passed down through the ancestors so we derive our rights and reponsibilities from our ancestors as members of the British or, English, Scottish, Welsh and Ulster family of nations. These are not the universal abstractions that progressives use they are concrete and specific to us. They evolved with the nation like the language. Our ways, customs, mores were inherited from within our nation and are different from other European nations but run parallel with them. The universal idea that what suits us is applicable in Africa, say, is ludicrous because they have different ways, customs etc. In fact it insults them, as it implies there ways are inferior and they need ours.

The corollary to this arrogance is the way the elites want give to immigrants what is ours. They did not bring their own houses, money and maternity wards with them so they are being given what is ours by inherited right. They are also assuming authority over us in the police, law, and buraeucracy; this also takes our responsibility off us by giving them our roles.

The welfare of these young girls is being abandoned by those responsible for it like the police and social servicesus and far from feeling guilty to immigrants, we we must assume responsibility and protect our young girls. When did the disgusting NSPCC speak for them?

These girls have been corrupted and sexualised by modern commerce; by the media.

Derliction of duty applies in general and is a failure to fulfill our obligations to our own people.

There is another imported evil - the terror threat. The same type of people who are raping our girls are posing a threat of terror to us so what do the authorities do? They notify community leaders before they raid looking for explosives.

On 17th January 1999 The Sunday Times reported: “ That around 2,000 Muslims attend training camps around Britain to study Holy War. They were held at weekends in Birmingham and London. Recruits were taught hand-to-hand combat and survival techniques for civil strife. For weapon training and military training in the Yemen and Afghanistan. How do the Security Services deal with this? They ignore it and harass the“far-right”.

The Daily Telegraph of August 10th 2010 revealed that the new security "strategy to tackle extremists is to focus on white racists.” Needless to say this was announced by Shalid Malik the Communities Minister. Scotland Yard warned last month that such groups could be planning a terrorist "spectacular" to stoke up racial tensions. This was a clear indication of the new tactics. Commander Shaun Sawyers, signalling the complicity of the security services with Muslim extremists and that they can carry on developing their terror structures because security services would focus on “Whites. (3) The impression given is that Muslims can carry on developing terror networks because we are equating "far-right extremists" with you to divert the public gaze.

The Met's counter-terrorism command has increased the number of officers in a special unit monitoring Right-wing extremists because of "the threat". Yet they have at least 8 members of al-Queda in the police service!

Just as blaming the violated girls by labelling them “vulnerable” the Security Services attack people as “racists” or “ far-right extemists” to take the public eye off Muslim extremists. To put it bluntly they are supporting a war for the ownership of our homeland and excusing the violation of young White girls. (4)

Birmingham journalists covered up Muslim involvement in the Birmingham Street Battles of August 2009 after an EDL anti-extremist demo and blamed the EDL as “far-right extremists”. These Birmingham journalists also cover up terrorist cells in Birmingham.
Eight young Muslim terrorists from Birmingham, London and Luton on active service were arrested in Aden in December 1998, planning terror attacks against British targets. The security services then claimed they had no idea that Muslim street soldiers were being recruited in British mosques and trained in terror camps! Do we believe them?

The state alliance with Muslim terrorists.

Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, told an Italian newspaper in 2008, that the government of Italy in the 1970s agreed to allow Arab terrorist groups freedom of movement in the country in exchange for immunity from attacks. The government of Prime Minister Aldo Moro reached a "secret non-belligerence pact between the Italian state and Palestinian resistance organizations, including terrorist groups." According to the former president, it was Moro himself who designed the terms of the agreement with the foreign Arab terrorists. "The terms of the agreement were that the Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country, and they had freedom of entry and exit without being subject to normal police controls, because they were 'handled' by the secret services." As Interior Minister, Cossiga said that he learned PLO members in Italy had diplomatic immunity as representatives of the Arab League. "The Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country."

The British had a similar deal with Muslim terrorists. In 1988, Omar Bakri Mohammed admitted there was a deal between British Secret Services and Muslim terrorists. He stated: “I work here in accordance with the covenant of peace which I made with the British government when I got asylum … “ see Al-Sharq Al-Awsat of 22 August 1998.

The Bishop of Rochester related how at a diiner the Algerian foreign minister revealed that when the Algerians warned the government about the terrorists they were harbouring in London they were told they are “freedom fighters.”! (5)

Islamist ideas are spread through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995, spreading radicalism and creating two separate identities and sets of allegiance. The education system is being used to brainwash our children to excuse and encourage Muslim terrorism.

There are several examples of how the elites submit to the threat of Muslim terror. They abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems when the Saudis threatened that, if the case was not dropped: ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk” - former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. (6)

Muslim terrorists were welcomed into Britain and financed by state benefits. They needed to answer no questions and needed to show no papers and this began under Thatcher lived in a gated community. They got free education, free health care even when they openly developed terrorist cells and trained bombers for active service in other parts of the world. These are boosted by a deceitful system called “Asylum.”

Few have any legal entitlement to enter this country but are allowed to stay and provided extra benefits we do not get like free cars, mobile phones and decorated houses even after the London bombing of 7/7. Without this encouragement al-Queda could not have got into the West to launch bombing attacks like those in London and Madrid. It is truly ludicrous to think the authorities do not know what is going on.

We have people just strolling into the country. There are illegal immigrants driving round untaxed and the police allow them to. Our diabolical elites have given up controlling our country and protecting people and allow immigrants to do what they like to us. We have to look into ourselves to find the weakness, then draw strength and confront the terrorist communities and protect these young girls. The elites won't - they will form committees, appoint officials even a government minister to pretend they are doing something, but will not stop it. What is wrong with us to allow outsiders to come into our country, plant bombs, rape our children and do nothing about it?

We have been mislead by the elites to think everything is hunky dory but we are realising now that it is far from that. The elites are more “vulnerable” than ever now because so many of their machinations have been exposed.

The American pastor Terry Jones who recently threatened to burn a copy of the Koran has been banned from Britain. A Home Office spokesperson said the government opposes extremism in all its forms. This is a lie because there was a covenant between the British government and Muslim terrorists as I will show. They claim to believe in freedom of speech and democracy but only if you say and think what they want you to. If you think for yourself or dissent you will be oppressed by he state.

The term “racism” is used to pathologise people who oppose being pushed out of their communities by the masses of immigrants the elites are importing. It implies there is something wrong in our minds. It is as if we have caught a disease and they must stop it spreading. They use pejoratives to put us in quarantine, to keep others away from us and contain the spread of something considered dangerous. They are now investigating 3-year olds for signs of this illness developing. (1). They want to know how it we caught it and they warn others to take precautions against catching it.

The elites use words ideologically and label people as haters, racists – use words as weapons. They give opponents a bad name like warning people of a dog that bites so no one will touch it.

They have conflated hatred with prudence. If one does not want too many immigrants in they are accused of hating them. If you object to masses of foreigners immigrating they say its because you are xenophobic. This is to suggest you are some horrible person who hates them all. This cows people and instead of parents using their traditional inherited prejudices to warn their children to keep away from ethnic minorities in the wake of widespread Muslim gang rapes of young girls they condition them to think the ethics are all nice and benefiting their lives.

People should realise these definitions like “racist”, “xenophobe” or “hater” are not some objective truth but ideologically-loaded words coined by interest groups to get people to surrender to immigrants who are being used to undercut the wages of indigenous people and make the elites feel morally superior even though they themselves live apart from it. It works like a censor in the head to stop certain natural thoughts and behaviour traits. The term “racism” is used by people to control us or to silence our objections to being pushed out of our communities. It was made up by somebody.

The “experts” and Establishment intellectuals describe the violated girls as vulnerable to shift the focus on to the victims instead of the perpetrators - to exonerate Muslims; but these rapes of young girls are attacks on them, not self-inflicted. The focus must be kept on the attackers and not let the duplicitous elites pass it from their pets to raped young girls.

It is an indictment on us as a whole that these young girls are out wandering around and not being protected.

In a recent essay I referred to the academics who changed our ethnocentrism to other centrism: the shift of focus from ourselves to looking up to other ethnic groups and immigrants as bearers of virtue and cultural enrichment who are improving our lives or coming to look after us. This is at the root of this Act of War because to Muslims we are “other” or the “out group”. They dehumanise us with terms like infidel and kuffar.

These abuses would not happen if we had retained our traditional prejudices against foreigners and if we asserted ourselves. Instead all we have is girly and corrupt elites covering up for the alien child-rapists. Once this came out after years of covering it up the elites immediately started trying to deceive us by talking it away and trying to say“Whites" are as bad when this is actually ethnic guerrilla war on our communities by a rival community.

We have to work on regaining our confidence and value our selves, our culture, history and traditions not apologise to outsiders. Our customs, notions of right and wrong were inherited and passed down as moral guidance by the parents but have been taken out of their hands by the state. Where the parents should be advising their children to keep away from ethnics the schools are telling them to mix with them and there lives will be improved. That is why these children go with Muslim: they have been trained to think they are nice and bringing enrichment: the teachers are destroying the children's natural defences. The parents are unsure of themselves because the advice they get from “experts” contradicts their own common sense.

Some think we need a philosophy. Well, here is a brief interlude. We do not only have rights we have duties that go with them. The colloquial expression “by rights” retains this sense. People say “By rights you should receive or do so and so.” It means “By all that is right” which includes obligations. Rights did not just mean rights to do things it also included duty. These were passed down through the ancestors so we derive our rights and responsibilities from our ancestors as members of the British or, English, Scottish, Welsh and Ulster family of nations. These are not the universal abstractions that progressives use they are concrete and specific to us. They evolved with the nation like the language. Our ways, customs, mores were inherited from within our nation and are different from other European nations but run parallel with them. The universal idea that what suits us is applicable in Africa, say, is ludicrous because they have different ways, customs etc. In fact it insults them, as it implies there ways are inferior and they need ours.

The corollary to this arrogance is the way the elites want give to immigrants what is ours. They did not bring their own houses, money and maternity wards with them so they are being given what is ours by inherited right. They are also assuming authority over us in the police, law, and bureaucracy; this also takes our responsibility off us by giving them our roles.

The welfare of these young girls is being abandoned by those responsible for it like the police and social services and far from feeling guilty to immigrants, we we must assume responsibility and protect our young girls. When did the disgusting NSPCC speak for them?

These girls have been corrupted and sexualised by modern commerce; by the media.

Dereliction of duty applies in general and is a failure to fulfill our obligations to our own people.

There is another imported evil - the terror threat. The same type of people who are raping our girls are posing a threat of terror to us so what do the authorities do? They notify community leaders before they raid looking for explosives.

On 17th January 1999 The Sunday Times reported: That "around 2,000 Muslims attend training camps around Britain to study Holy War. They were held at weekends in Birmingham and London. Recruits were taught hand-to-hand combat and survival techniques for civil strife. For weapon training and military training in the Yemen and Afghanistan. How do the Security Services deal with this? They ignore it and harass the “far-right”.

The Daily Telegraph of August 10th 2010 revealed that the new security "strategy to tackle extremists is to focus on white racists.” Needless to say this was announced by Shalid Malik the Communities Minister. Scotland Yard warned last month that such groups could be planning a terrorist "spectacular" to stoke up racial tensions. This was a clear indication of the new tactics. Commander Shaun Sawyers, signalling the complicity of the security services with Muslim extremists and that they can carry on developing their terror structures because security services would focus on “Whites. (3) The impression given is that Muslims can carry on developing terror networks because we are equating "far-right extremists" with you to divert the public gaze.

The Met's counter-terrorism command has increased the number of officers in a special unit monitoring Right-wing extremists because of "the threat". Yet they have at least 8 members of al-Queda in the police service!

Just as blaming the violated girls by labelling them “vulnerable” the Security Services attack people as “racists” or “far-right extremists” to take the public eye off Muslim extremists. To put it bluntly they are supporting a war for the ownership of our homeland and excusing the violation of young White girls. (4)

Birmingham journalists covered up Muslim involvement in the Birmingham Street Battles of August 2009 after an EDL anti-extremist demo and blamed the EDL as “far-right extremists”. These Birmingham journalists also cover up terrorist cells in Birmingham.

Eight young Muslim terrorists from Birmingham, London and Luton on active service were arrested in Aden in December 1998, planning terror attacks against British targets. The security services then claimed they had no idea that Muslim street soldiers were being recruited in British mosques and trained in terror camps! Do we believe them?

The state alliance with Muslim terrorists.

Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, told an Italian newspaper in 2008, that the government of Italy in the 1970s agreed to allow Arab terrorist groups freedom of movement in the country in exchange for immunity from attacks. The government of Prime Minister Aldo Moro reached a "secret non-belligerence pact between the Italian state and Palestinian resistance organizations, including terrorist groups." According to the former president, it was Moro himself who designed the terms of the agreement with the foreign Arab terrorists. "The terms of the agreement were that the Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country, and they had freedom of entry and exit without being subject to normal police controls, because they were 'handled' by the secret services." As Interior Minister, Cossiga said that he learned PLO members in Italy had diplomatic immunity as representatives of the Arab League. "The Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country."

The British had a similar deal with Muslim terrorists. In 1988, Omar Bakri Mohammed admitted there was a deal between British Secret Services and Muslim terrorists. He stated: “I work here in accordance with the covenant of peace which I made with the British government when I got asylum … " see Al-Sharq Al-Awsat of 22 August 1998.

The Bishop of Rochester related how at a dinner the Algerian foreign minister revealed that when the Algerians warned the government about the terrorists they were harbouring in London they were told they are “freedom fighters.”! (5)

Islamist ideas are spread through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995, spreading radicalism and creating two separate identities and sets of allegiance. The education system is being used to brainwash our children to excuse and encourage Muslim terrorism.

There are several examples of how the elites submit to the threat of Muslim terror. They abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems when the Saudis threatened that, if the case was not dropped: ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk” - former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. (6)

Muslim terrorists were welcomed into Britain and financed by state benefits. They needed to answer no questions and needed to show no papers and this began under Thatcher lived in a gated community. They got free education, free health care even when they openly developed terrorist cells and trained bombers for active service in other parts of the world. These are boosted by a deceitful system called “Asylum.”

Few have any legal entitlement to enter this country but are allowed to stay and provided extra benefits we do not get like free cars, mobile phones and decorated houses even after the London bombing of 7/7. Without this encouragement al-Queda could not have got into the West to launch bombing attacks like those in London and Madrid. It is truly ludicrous to think the authorities do not know what is going on.

We have people just strolling into the country. There are illegal immigrants driving round untaxed and the police allow them to. Our diabolical elites have given up controlling our country and protecting people and allow immigrants to do what they like to us. We have to look into ourselves to find the weakness, then draw strength and confront the terrorist communities and protect these young girls. The elites won't - they will form committees, appoint officials even a government minister to pretend they are doing something, but will not stop it. What is wrong with us to allow outsiders to come into our country, plant bombs, rape our children and do nothing about it?

We have been mislead by the elites to think everything is hunky dory but we are realising now that it is far from that. The elites are more “vulnerable” than ever now because so many of their machinations have been exposed.
________________

ByActs of War are often invasions of peaceful countries but the present incidence of Muslims raping young white girls must be considered an Act of War as it is carried out by a separate and homogenous community imported into our country by the deceit of the elites against the interests of the indigenous people.

Can anyone imagine the great Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston allowing aliens to gang rape our young girls? In 1850, for the assault on British subject Don Pacifico in Greece, a foreign country, he sent the navy and blockaded their ports Greece was under the joint protection of three powers: Russia and France protested against its coercion by the British fleet and the French ambassador temporarily left London. It was the cause of Palmerston’s declaration that British subjects ought everywhere to be protected by the strong arm of the British government against injustice and wrong; comparing the reach of the British Empire to that of the Roman Empire, in which a Roman citizen could walk the earth unmolested by any foreign power.

This was the famous, five-hour speech Civis Britannicus, in which he delivered himself of this sentiment:

“As the Roman, in days of old, held himself free from indignity, when he could say, Civis Romanus sum, so also a British subject, in whatever land he may be, shall feel confident that the watchful eye and the strong arm of England will protect him from injustice and wrong.”

The low and worthless rulers we have now even cover up for aliens raping our young girls in our own towns and cities. Just compare girly Michael Gove with this great man. What an embarrassment! The sight of the elites on the BBC’s Question Time talking away this reality to cover it up was sickening. They:

(1) unanimously agreed Jack Straw was a racist for hinting that Pakistani males are serial sex offenders against young white girls, and would not even discuss the reality;

(2) didn’t mention that Pakistani women must be virgins at marriage and risk assault or death if they step out of line.

Michael Gove was a prig, and the ultra-orthodox Jeanette Winterson of course made her feminist points. She is a “hater” - but only of fashionable targets like white males. I suggest you read her books to see what she thinks of men. Are these vile liars and cowards our representatives? Do they speak for us? No, we must protect our people ourselves and campaign to protect young white girls from the alliance of secrecy between the degenerate elites and Muslim child-rapists. When does the fight back start to protect our people - Now!

Events that might cause us to revolt are kept quiet at first. But if the truth comes out they try to nullify its effects. This is why Muslim child-rapists are classed as criminals. We must be encouraged to think they are the same as white paedophiles. But they are from a different community and never do it to their own, only other communities children like whites and Sikhs.

The police and social services kept these activities quiet for years and even tried to sue Channel 4 to stop them exposing it. The late Colin Cramphorn, CBE, QPM, DL, FRSA, Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, told a public meeting that we must “learn to live” with the rapes of young white children. Instead of doing their duty to combat crime the local police forces aided and abetted these evil crimes by
covering them up.

Cramphorn none too gently persuaded Channel 4 to postpone its investigation Edge of the City as it would “increase community tensions” in the run up to local and European elections in 2004. He didn’t do that because there was no charge to answer:

More than a year in the making, Edge of the City follows social workers with difficult cases in one inner city.

The most controversial of these witnesses authorities and parents trying to stop groups of young men who are grooming girls as young as 11 for sex.

Although none of the officials in the film raise race as the issue in these predatory relationships, the filmmakers make it perfectly clear that the abusers are predominantly Asian, and all of the abused girls are white.

This is the controversy at the heart of the film which cries out for explanation. But instead, the story is shoe-horned into 90 minutes, along with those of an elderly man fighting for independence, a troubled couple dealing with disability and alcoholism and a trainee social worker’s determination to help a serial teenager offender.

The recent, belated expose of the extent of Muslims gang-raping young white girls has at last brought this evil into the public consciousness. Progressives are trying to remove its sting: nullify it by adapting it to their unworldly ideology. If they do not Whites would start to revolt and there are a lot more of us. Its only by controlling what people are allowed to know that keeps the masses passive; even welfare entitlements and employing a large per cent of the population could lose their force if people knew it was a rival ethnic community that is raping young children. Some recalcitrant facts could not be swayed away and remain: The Times investigation is based around 56 men convicted in the Midlands and north of England since 1997, 50 from Muslim backgrounds. Muslim men even hang around outside school gates looking for young White girls to drug and rape, but no teacher speaks out.

Former Labour MP Ann Cryer provoked an attempt to hide the truth in 2003 when she said the traditional culture of arranged marriages could have caused a criminal minority of Asian men to target vulnerable young white girls for sex. No, but the gang-raping of minors is criminal and the police and social services aided and abetted these predators by covering up.

Another attempt to falsify reality came from Mohammed Shafiq, director of the Lancashire-based Ramadhan Foundation, said last year:

“I think the police are overcautious because they are afraid of being branded racist. These men are criminals and should be treated as criminals - whatever their race.”

This is the same excuse the Government used for IRA terrorists. That those political terrorists were criminals. We really must not take any notice of this cowardly twaddle.

In the Netherlands young white girls are gang-raped and used for prostitution by Moroccan pimps, known as ‘loverboys’. Sweden is the rape capital of Europe – well, the Muslim parts are.

To sample the official “conspiracy of silence” that allows hundreds of vulnerable white girls in some towns to be abused by Asian men: Ajmal Mohamed, a 43-year-old from Blackburn. In 2004, Mohammed, took a schoolgirl to a Manchester hotel room and got her drunk to celebrate her 14th birthday. The child ran away. Police were called, but he denied having sex with her and they issued him with a “child abduction warning letter”. They allowed it to continue. He was never prosecuted.

Two years later, Mohammed took another 14-year-old to a hotel room in Blackpool and did rape this one. When the police arrested him they found the phone numbers of six other vulnerable young girls on his mobile phone. The police who let him off the first time have personal responsibility for the second attack and must be held accountable.

In industrial towns across the North and the Midlands, in just three years 51 people have been convicted in trials involving groups of men who have picked up young girls for gang-raping and sexual exploitation. Forty-eight of the offenders were Asian; the vast majority of the victims were white. Recently, in Derby, nine men, eight of them Asian, were sentenced for their parts in a gang that groomed, sexually exploited and in some cases raped 27 local children, 22 of them white.

In 2006, Blackburn’s local paper, the Lancashire Telegraph, launched a “Keep Them Safe” campaign to make the authorities tackle what it called “sexual grooming and abduction - which predominantly involves Asian men”. In article after article, the paper charted locals’ frustration at officials refusal to do what they are paid for and help the girls. In 2007, the Lancashire Telegraph reported, that some parents had threatened to sue the police for their failure to act. The editor, Kevin Young, said: “This is an extremely sensitive subject, and the Telegraph gave it a lot of consideration before launching its campaign.” They should sue the police for covering the widespread rape of children up.

Like the liars on QT the judiciary takes the side of foreign sex attackers. In October 2007 evil Judge Sir Henry Hodge stopped the deportation of a serial sex attacker because it would breach his human right to a family life. Hodge was an immigration judge busy trying to destroy our country. The foreigner admitted indecently assaulting 11 women in the previous five years and has committed a string of other offences including robbery, burglary, arson and drugs.

Hodge, who was the husband of the one-time paedophile-embroiled Labour politician and former minister Margaret Hodge, ruled he should be allowed to stay because he came to the UK at the age of six and has almost no family left in West Africa. To support his decision, he cited article eight of the Human Rights Act, which gives a person the right to a family life. Thats it! Family life for vile perverts but ruined lives for the victims and no legal catharsis offered.

Another evil judge sentenced Stuart Wood, with previous convictions for violence and indecent assault on young girls, to just seven years for a vicious rape, then praised him for converting to Islam:

You have turned to Islam and this promises well for your future, particularly as you are now an adherent of a religion which respects women and self-discipline.”

Under Sharia Law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are taken as confessing to having sex.

It is true that white paedophiles travel to Thailand to practise their perversion. Thailand is degenerate for allowing its children to be degraded and the perverted whites who go there to abuse children must be punished as severely as the Muslims who do it here must. These are crimes against a different ethnic group, the “other”.

It is true, too, that Catholic priests abused children and the Catholic authorities covered it up. But the Muslim issue is different. The abuse is to white girls and the responsible authorities whom the white majority vote for and pay for cover it up.

These girls are being raped and then groomed for prostitution. To Muslims whites are less than human. They dehumanised us with terms like Kuffar and Infidel. They hook young White girls on drugs and alcohol, and emotionally torture them. This is not about sex: If they wanted sex they could buy the services of prostitutes. They are easy to find and advertise. Why instead of that do they use drugs, alcohol and mental degradation on those girls and pass them around like pieces of meat? It is using our young women as the spoils of war. The deliberate degredation of non-Muslims, unbelievers, infidels? To emphasise the power, the supremacy, of Islam?

Anybody who has looked into the eyes of someone howling with pain at sexual abuse they suffered as a child knows how wicked and despicable people are the scum on Question Time, the judiciary and the police are for covering this up. What is clear is that our civilisation is being dragged down to the level of a Third World hell-hole of savages. Muslims have no place in Europe and must be deported. The authorities are terrified of us revolting and yet they are making it inevitable by their appeasement of the perpetrators of these Acts of War.

Friday, 7 January 2011

In the undeclared war to replace British people and their culture with a multi-racial society the elites blame “Whites” for all evils including their own dispossession. They are scapegoats manipulated by guilt and blame themselves for corporations importing cheap labour. “We won’t do the dirty jobs” they have been trained to think by education and the media. This is hogwash for in reality if they refuse a job they lose their benefits.

Socialists live in the past instead of learning from history. The Jarrow Crusade is a famous and noble event in modern British history. It was a march of 200 unemployed men to parliament petitioning for assistance for those unemployed. There is a bridge over The Tyne to Newcastle being constructed and the French firm with the contract has imported most of the labour from France and other European countries yet I was told by the landlady of a pub near by:” The ones who complain are the ones who don’t want to work.” They are kept passive with state benefits while in Jarrow, once again, a “high unemployment area,” work goes to foreigners. The re-development of Liverpoolwas carried out by largely imported cheap labour.Modern ideas are formulated by unworldly academics when a practical activity like politics requires experience of life and a knowledge of human nature. A student of “Human Geography” told me she likes the exotic communities in her native London and visits for a meal or to watch a cultural show. But this is the surface of life; the deep side of life is rearing families and developing communities. She goes there as a spectator to sample delights and returns home like a tourist. This shows how “progressives” see the situation as static but it is not it is dynamic. The immigrants have human nature like us and bring it with them. They replicate their cultures here and prosecute loyalties to their own and grudges against other groups which is why the immigration of Muslims is leading to attacks on Jewish people in Europe and as they grew stronger a New Holocaust which the elites are fostering. As I have written elsewhere, agreements like The European-Mediterranean Partnership heralds the New Holocaust and people of Jewish antecedents like Sarkozy and David Milliband are bringing it on their own people in Europe. Jewish communities must rebel against their myopic leaders to save themselves and their children.

The young student has been taught the Marxist idea that people are social constructs and have no essential human nature which is a new version of the old body and mind duality. Is the mind separate from the body? In fact the two interact with the male and female genes respectively affecting thought and behaviour patterns. Culture is also interactive. We create a culture through our genes and new generations are born into it and moulded by it.

This is at the heart of our loss of touch with reality. We are taught that men and women are empty vessels but in our private lives assess people we meet else get taken advantage of while our public lives are conducted in a naïve and unworldly way.

On the surface we are socially constructed as the young students views were, or in fashion which is different now from say 10 years ago, a century ago or 2,000 years ago; but human nature is produced by genetic inheritance and unchangeable or we would not understand classic literature and The Bible.

It had never occurred to her that we are being decultured. She had not heard this before and was perplexed and searching round to find a stereotype for me. Are you a racist? This is the negative category they have been trained to slot us into. Students are educated out of using natural commonsense.

By pretending everyone is malleable with no essential human nature they convince themselves that all is under control and we are developing into a harmonious multi-racial utopia. This type of abstract thinking grew out of The Enlightenment and first showed its potential in The French Revolution. The working classes have been trained by the media with constant slander (1)As far back as 1955 workers who tried to defend their jobs were suppressed by the state as the 1955strike of bus workers in West Bromwich , in protest against the employment of an Indian conductor!When the National Health Service and London Transport were being developed if thy needed labour they should have improved conditions and increased pay structures not imported cheap labour. The British capitalist class have always done this and we read about Irish workers being imported to break strikes for better conditions in Mrs.Gaskell’s classic novel Mary Barton. They should learn from history after the trouble they caused by importing labour like Tamils into Sri Lanka to produce rubber.On 20th January 1955 when immigration from Jamaica was 11,000 a year, Conservative Cyril Osborne(later knighted) had written to the London Times,” But the present West Indian and West African invasion is a mere trickle of what we must expect, because as the law now stands everyone born in the Commonwealth is entitled to come to this country. What shall we do when the millions living in the bigger areas decide to emigrate?” At the second reading of the Commonwealth Immigration Bill (1961) Osborne warned “that the world’s poor would swarm to Britain’s welfare honey pot. We have neither the room nor the resources to take all who would like to come.” Both sides of the House laughed at him and called him Fascist.” We are seeing this now with boats leaving Africa for Europe.Eminent economist Professor Ezra Mishan exposed immigration as being about cheap labour in the 1960s. He wrote in The Salisbury Review in 1988: “Frequent claims that the new immigrants have in fact reduced the labour shortage in particular sectors of the economy – in particular, the apparent shortages of labour in transport, in nursing, and in what are popularly to be the more menial and less attractive occupations- are naïve. Managers of public services in Britain who, along with some private firms, sent agents to the West Indiesin the 1950’s in order to recruit labour were only acting as good capitalists would in such circumstances – attracting lower-paid labour from outside their area in order to prevent wages from rising within it. If it was not for that wages would have risen.”The elites are creating what Marx called “A reserve army of labour.” In November 2006 it emerged that the Government were advertising for immigrants to come here. A Foreign Office pamphlet declares: 'Multicultural Britain - A Land of Immigrants'. It encourages immigrants to move here because of the preferential treatment they get under the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs. The Foreign Office put it in embassies across the world. In a book review for the Salisbury Review of Spring 2003 Sir Alfred Sherman, former senior advisor to Mrs Thatcher and leader writer on the Jewish Chronicle, recalled a friend in race relations had asked him to take a look at the reception areas of Deptford and Southall in the mid 60’s, “ I was horrified. My natural vague sympathies for the immigrants, strangers in a foreign land, was replaced by strong but hopeless sympathy for the British victims of mass immigration, whose home areas were being occupied. I was made aware of a disquieting evolution in “Establishment” attitudes towards what they called immigration or race relations and I dubbed “colonialisation.” The well-being and rights of immigrants and ethnic minorities had become paramount. The British working classes, hitherto the object of demonstrative solicitude by particularly the New Establishment on the left, but the working classes had acquired new status as the enemy, damned by the all-purpose pejorative “racists.” The transformation of Southall was brought about by Wolf’s rubber factory encouraging workers from India.They use abstract pejoratives to justify doing the opposite. The new elites detest competition and advocate co-operation to suppress male aggression as part of their feminisation programme. Leo McKinsty commented on our Olympic achievements in the Daily Mail of 20 August 2008: "Over the past weekend, our sailors, cyclists, swimmers and rowers won an unprecedented eight gold medals, by far the greatest haul by Britons in two days in a century of Olympic competition...Of the 14 heroes pictured on the front page of yesterday's Mail, six were educated at independent schools… nor is this some statistical anomaly. The disproportionate Olympic success of privately educated contestants has been an enduring pattern in recent years....Equality of outcome is the central theme of the politically correct British state. The concept of a talented elite is despised rather than celebrated. The new elites loathe male authority and attack masculinity as patriarchy. They see the main enemy as white racism and this justifies disadvantaging white pupils. No other ethnic group can be racist because they are sentimentally categorised as victims of our oppression and require "special needs". While we are blamed as oppressors we are being oppressed at school as children are told their views could be offensive. What this really means is what they are doing does not fit into to the totalitarian ideological orthodoxy.

Old fashioned categories like opposing immigration are no longer applicable because massive and uncontrolled immigration for social engineering and cheap labour take our territory so we are actually defending ourselves against colonisation.

When we were homogeneous we trusted one another and the police did not need to be armed; we are in a surveillance state and have totalitarian race laws to oppress us.

To control thought totalitarians redefine words and change the meaning of legal terms. Sir Ronald Bell told W.I.S.E. in 1981: “… a discriminating person was someone to be admired. People have been brainwashed into thinking that it is a bad word except when native inhabitants are being handicapped. That is now called positive discrimination, and is deemed a good thing.”

We need to develop a new political vocabulary to express what is happening to us and how we see the world and describe human nature and why this rules out a successful multi-racial society. The Welsh have it right in their great anthem “Land of my Fathers”. Country is vapid but land means something. The ruling bureaucrats of the E.U. and our regional Government are restricting our vocabularies through P.C. so that we speak and think in the way they want us to. We can not express our sufferings in PC terminology because the words are essentially biased against our interests like the young student who could not understand what I said but had to apply the connatative term “racist” to me. A connotative word carries a set of associations or connotations above the literal meaning. Only “Whites” are classed as racist!

The terms “narrow-minded” and “bigot” are only applied to traditional views while narrow-minded multi-racial bigots are presented as morally superior! I recently tried to talk to one from Bingham about villages becoming dormitory places where young locals could not afford to buy or rent property because of weekend dwellers. I asked what had caused it and he replied rich people from London and Manchester. I pointed out that in the big cities this is caused by pressure from asylum seekers and the birth rate of immigrants and that the government is bringing them at a rate of 1500 a day. I replied I get my information from government documents in The Public Records Office. This threatened his fixed view of the world and he stormed out of the room in a perfect show of “narrow-minded bigotry!”

Society is an old liberal term and we must speak of ourselves as “communities” and a British community. All communities grow out of collective human nature. Today's view of persons interacting in societies originated with Enlightenment philosophy - people are equal, interchangeable units of production and consumption with differences of race, nationality, culture, gender and ability seen as social constructs and impediments to social harmony.

Real people are not abstractions like “equals” or “humanity” but Englishmen and Frenchmen and women, Indians etc. Burke, Thucydides and Confucius all stressed the importance of human nature. Our loyalties like those of immigrants” … begin (with) our public affections in our families... we pass on to our neighbourhoods" this expands outwards to our nation. Men and women have distinctive and individual identities within their inherited collective identity. We belong to our kin above strangers and this affects the type of community we create. The family, locality and nation, are parts of a natural, organic state as opposed to an artificial one based on planning. The French Revolution, like the Soviet, Maoist and Cambodian, were attempts to recreate human nature and refashion a people. The modern world is dominated by artificial empires, Global corporations and bureaucracies, which treat human beings as abstract entities. However, tribalism is returning and the future belongs to these human scale structures which develop over time not instant and artificial creations.Burke’s famous definition of society is that it was a continuous community of the living, the dead and those who are yet to be born. Each man and woman is part of a larger body. The individual dies, but descendents live on. Tradition is a surer guide to action than abstract reason and our parents advice received from their parents before them is better than a rationalist formulae in a “How to …book.” Modern society believes change is always better than what exists and the past is obsolete. But we inherit what we are and what have from our ancestors and have a duty to pass it on to our descendents not dissipate amongst the rest of the world.

A nation's manners, its morals, its religions and political institutions, its social structure, are inherited from ancestors and grow out of the character of the people at that time. Government from Brussels, economic control by Global corporations, and Afro-Asian colonization is part of a new dream for an ideal future; but in practice it is disinheriting our children to whom we are morally obliged to pass on the inheritance.

It is the ceding of territory to the colonialists that shows the weakness and effeteness of our rulers.Throughout history wars have been fought for territory and by allowing newcomers to stake claims our girly elites are encouraging them to fight for more. In The territorial Imperative Robert Ardry explains how much having a country has boosted Israelis.Our rulers are doing this for invaders and this changes our relationship to them.

We obliged to put our nation first, as we do with our families, even when outsiders and foreigners are more in need of our help. Charity should begin at home but if people wish to donate money to foreign causes they should be allowed to do so but supporting outsiders against our own kind is a moral evil.

1) This is a classic piece of propaganda from contractor UK for cheap labour that blames the workers for the corporations using cheap labour.

Wednesday, 5 January 2011

Amajor problem for decent people living their everyday lives is the take over of towns and cities by violent gangs. This is usually compounded by weakness on the part of the authorities or, as now, fear of offending Political Correctness. This allows the gangs to develop and move into ilicit businesses and corrupt more young followers and harm innocent members of the public. The massive and exteremy violent LA gangs are infamous throughout the world but there is a similar proliferation in England and ignoring them does a lot more harm than dealing with the early manifestations. In Birmingham, England the local authorities have allowed gangs to develop and the consequences are that ordinary members of the public are put in danger.

There is a street in the city centre devoted to entertainment called Broad Street and on Sunday nights armed police often have to attend disturbances involving young gang members outside a venue and take guns and knives off them. They now have to use barriers that people have to walk through to detetect metal before allowing them into bars. The Broad Street manager does not see to know what is going on. He informed one of my assistants:

“There are Police deployed outside Rococo on a Sunday night on a regular basis. They are not however armed with anything other than the normal telescopic truncheon, gas and the general equipment issued to all officers. Taser teams are occasionally used on Broad Street but not specifically outside Rococo. Armed police with machine guns and the like are always available. But that is a general facet of policing. When the knife arches go up we tend to get no knives at all. That's the idea of them, they scare people off!”

This was unheard of in England until quite recently but is becoming common with the image of the friendly English bobby long gone! Members of the public are unaware of the danger they are in because the local media keep it quiet to avoid spoiling the image of the city and the police try to avoid making arrests which allows it to thrive to the detriment of the population as a whole. There have been several incidents of ordinary members of the public being injured with beer glasses and they are at risk of being shot. (1)

A lesson from modern English hstory was Sheffield in the 1920s, which was terrorised by gangsters. They lived in cramped back to back houses in courtyards which sociologists use as an excuse for preying on other poor people, but joining a gang gives power, a sense of importance, of belonging to something, money, possessions, prestige and low women being available.

The Sheffield gangs waited outside factories on pay day and took workers' wages off them. Bookmakers operated outside factory gates with “runners” inside collecting bets for them and one made £75 to around a £100 each day even though it was illegal. Another popular form of gambling was “pitch and toss.” This is a simple form of betting that had no equipment to pack up and carry away. It was just tossing 3 coins into the air with the two forefingers and betting on the proportion of, say, heads that turned up.

The biggest “Pitching” site was on “Sky Edge,” a promontory that gives a panorama over the city and with well-placed lookouts or “Crows” raiding policeman could be spotted from afar. The head was a “towler” or “toller” because he made a toll of between 2/6d to 4-/- in the pound, on bets placed. They had helpers like “ponter”, “pilners” or “scouts” who were also called “pikers” or “crows” because they kept watch from strategic viewing spots and carried large sticks to prevent trouble. The business itself was a “joint” and the ring a “pitch” all these were paid well and were alert to police raids.

The game began on a shout: “Heads a pound” for the stake, and a return of “Tail it” when another matched the stake which was placed in the centre of the ring. The toll was paid by the better and into the Toller’s pocket. On Sky Edge it was three halfpennies flung by a “tosser”. The ponter picked them up and announced the winner. If unclaimed, the money doubled with each succeeding toss. If any thought there was a miss-toss they would shout, “barred!”

During the First World War with much work in munitions factories everything went smoothly but after the war with munitions work gone there was less money to go round so George Mooney, the leader of the Sky Edge ring, jettisoned his erstwhile associates from Park district where the pitch was. This led to a war for territory to avenge loss of profit and hurt pride. Bookmaker Sam Garvin formed a gang from Park and a gang war developed. Garvin was a promoter of bare-knuckle boxing matches in pub yards where fighters bound their knuckles with straw that was picked from wounds to the face between rounds.

The first attack in the gang war was Mooney’s mob invading the home of William Furniss. As a reprisal Frank Kidnew was slashed 100 times near Sky Edge then helped to hospital where he was more worried about his ruined suit than himself. Then the Park mob returned the compliment with a visit to Mooney’s home and tried to smash their way in. The Mooney’s defended themselves with guns and one attacker George (Ganner) Wheyall was shot in the shoulder. Police found a double-barrel shotgun, a rifle, revolver and ammunition, which earned Mooney a £10, fine. These vicious tit for tat attacks went on through 1923 with Garvin’s mob attaining control while Mooney’s mob disintegrated with members fighting amongst themselves as well as against the Park Gang.

An attack on Mooney’s home on May 18th 1925, led to an elderly spectator being hit on the neck by a brick and several police officers getting medical treatment. The assailants escaped through tha labyrinthine passageways that were at the backs of the little houses in courtyards. Only one was caught and he received £1 fine for the old man and £6 for assaulting a policeman.

On Christmas Eve the Park mob stormed Mooney’s home. Sam Garvin and three associates broke in and terrorised not only Mooney but also his wife and six children. One thug ironically advised Mooney’s 15 year-old daughter: “We’ve, come to wish your father a merry Christmas.” Mooney escaped being carved up by hiding in a cupboard upstairs. He then left Sheffield for a year. The Park mob were now the ruling gang but still kept up the attacks. The following December (1924) they raided former Mooney follower William Furniss’s home firing bullets and throwing bricks through the windows, smashing up the house up and a visiting friend with chair legs.

After this attack, Chief Constable Lieut. Col. Hall-Dalwood stated that each year the police were finding it harder to uphold the law because they were having extra work put on them, and courts were reluctant to convict and even if they did punishments were too light. In an interview with the Sheffield Daily Telegraph on 7th May, Chief Constable Hall-Dalwood complained: “The public of Sheffield is paying rates for police protection which under the circumstances it cannot possibly get. In Sheffield we have to admit we are floating on very thin ice indeed and we have to admit that, unless more generally helped by punishment to fit crimes…Sheffield’s police force is utterly inadequate numerically to cope with the wave of crime that must necessarily follow in the wake of the unemployment situation.”

He added, “It is the boast of the really bad man that he gets the best run for his money in Sheffield. He would rather be caught in Sheffield than any other part of the country because, he says, you have to produce more evidence for the prosecution in a Sheffield court to get a conviction than in any other town in the country. Moreover, the convicted man in Sheffield is invariably pleasantly surprised by the light character of his sentence. What is happening is that we are making thieves.”

The Sheffield Telegraph contradicted him and alleged that often the wrong people were convicted. A few weeks later it again excused the situation and played down the gangs: “Although there are a number of gangs in conflict” the danger “has been over-exaggerated in some quarters and there is a noticeable tendency to attribute the slightest breach of the peace to activities of one gang or another.”

What did the authorities think? The response of Alderman Alfred Cattell to the warnings of the Sheffield Independent, the newspaper that backed the chief constable and had compared Sheffield to the violent parts of Ireland, was: “No, I never look at your papers.” J.P. Harold Fisher commented: “We have on the bench some J.P.s who grapple with the cases before them, but older magistrates possess more pluck than the recent additions.” He added, that he had been personally threatened as he walked through the city. The Sheffield Mail revealed that some members of the Corporation Health Committee were landlords of slum properties.

Councillor Moses Humberstone J.P. Took a practical approach: “I think they should not be fined or bound over, they should be locked up until we get the whole gang in prison.” Alderman Wardley J.P. Was living in the past: “I recollect 50 years ago, that gangs were in existence in the City that could swallow up the Mooney Gang.”
At a conference of clergymen, the vicar of St. Matthew’s told his audience: ”They are terrorising even the magistrates and other people, and the magistrates hardly dare sentence them to punishment.”

The effectiveness of the police was undermined by corruption and drinking. In January 1930 three constables and nine bookmakers were charged with bribery. It emerge that around twenty officers from the Brightside area had been getting regular payments of small sums to turn a blind eye to gang activities from 1922 to 1929. There was a lull for a year during 1925-26, when an honest plain-clothes officer refused all bribes. Three officers were actually prosecuted, but only one convicted and he was found not guilty. Three bookmakers received fines.

On the 27th the Sheffield Mail informed the innocent townsfolk: ”The leaders of these gangs and freebooters, men who live on the fat of the land. They are men of good appearance. They possess persuasive personalities and glib tongues. They use every possible art and device to carry on their nefarious business. At one moment they spend money freely as though it were water…the next they are grabbing a glass of beer from a man’s mouth. They are a nuisance and a danger to publicans –they break glasses, assault customers, smash windows, serve themselves beer and don’t pay for it. They work the confidence trick on inoffensive people, row with one another and demand drinks after closing hours. Everyone goes in fear of them and they know it. One of their pet methods of assault is to break a glass on the counter and attack a man’s face with the jagged edges.”

Their main income was the tossing ring and “All kinds of men are employed by the proprietors to deal with various classes of “business”. They have glib-tongued contricksters who can lay a man out as easily as rolling over a nine-pin. One of the principals has himself been a boxer. Others dress flashily, wear heavy gold watch-guards and display their wealth arrogantly. These are not ignorant ruffians. They are men who have calculated quite coolly and calmly the gains to be won by their terrifying outlawry. They are prepared to put up a stiff fight for supremacy. Strong measures will be necessary to beat them down.” Gangsters have families but the boundaries stop with their own - those outside the circle were fair game for bullying and robbing. Innocent people who went out after dark were waylaid. Men were robbed of their wages on their way home from factories; thugs smashed pubs up and demanded protection money; some picked-pockets while others went “Bottling” (mugging). Genuine bookies and their clerks were intimidated by protection rackets and, if they did not pay, would be beaten and robbed, their stands smashed and satchels stolen. Gangsters also took the winnings after races were run”.

A consequence of gangs thriving was that, then as now, young people looked up to them as heroes and emulated them. “Junior Gangs” were in their late teens and early twenties. (2) They made violent attacks on innocent members of the public and like their role models they carried knives, coshes and razors. A trick learnt from their heroes was for several to walk into a pub and demand free drink and cigarettes, while one outside kept watch. If refused they would smash up the bar by throwing glasses, bottles, stools at the mirror behind the bar, then assaulting landlord and any remaining customers. If the police were notified they would return and do it again. People were too frightened to testify against them but if any did the magistrates were lenient.

In August 1923 four innocent men who had been to a show at Sheffield Empire were attacked by four youths on Leopold Street, one was hit over the head with a bottle. That very evening a young woman was talking to friends when a gang of youths punched her in the face. She would not take any action. A stranger was walking along Cambridge Street and passed a young man who asked if he wanted to buy a ring. When he refused he was punched down then five more appeared. He ran into the Albert Hall. The scam was usually done by a pair preying on innocent people and trying to sell them rings. The accomplice would also start bidding to up the price. If they refused they were “mugged”, for their money and valuables. As today these gangs had girls too. A set up in Wellington Street in September was a girl screaming for help with a gang of youths around her. One appeared to punch her and when a passer-by went to her aid she and the gang jumped him. Taxi drivers were regularly threatened and intimidated and forced to take gangsters home free.

The Sheffield Mail of 21st September commented on it, “The whole proceedings have caused considerable excitement in the city, and a new cry has been raised for the suppression of gangs.” These were young men acting as clerks or shop assistants. “They debauch and gamble and have one or two young girls in their train who are prepared to sacrifice themselves body and soul to the ruffianly crowd who are their masters. Their chief income is derived from picking pockets and selling dud jewellery. A new epidemic appears to have broken out, it will be interesting to see what measures are taken to suppress the disturbances.”

The next evening (the 22nd) a stranger was attacked on Cambridge Street. A man asked him if he would buy a ring and upon his refusal punched him in the face and as he rose five other men attacked. He got away into the Albert Hall and called the police but no one was arrested.

The scam with dud jewellery was usually gangsters operating in pairs. They would seek out a victim and one approached to sell the ring and when the victim was examining it the other would approach and, pretending interest, offer say two shillings for it. Then pretended he had forgotten his money and this show often conned the mark into buying. If he were not interested he would be “mugged.” Like their role models the juniors carried various weapons including guns.

Lt.Col.Hall-Dalwood told the Mail on 23rd January 1925, “We have broken the rings up. We have made numerous raids and brought the men before the magistrates, and we, as police, can do nothing more. So far as hooliganism is concerned, it must be well known to everybody who reads the papers that we are bringing in men sometimes three or four times a week for these offences. Whenever the law is broken we bring men before the magistrates. We are handicapped by the fact that the prosecutors are sometimes got at and we cannot bring our witnesses, but we do everything in our power.”

The Sky Edge was a high promontory and well watched by sentries so the gambling ring was safe from police raids. But as the Sheffield Mail explained the magistrates were passing lenient sentences on such as the “large batch” the police caught at Tinsley but the highest fine was only forty shillings. On leaving court the offenders hired taxis and went straight back to resume gambling. They could rake in up to £40 a day! The Quarter Sessions that week had sentenced members of the Park Brigade to the second division, an easier prison regime than hard labour which was “like sending them to Scarborough.”

The turning point was 1925. On September the third and fourth, the Fowler brothers Wilfred and Lawrence were hanged for the murder of William Plommer. Plommer, a labourer and father of four, was not involved with the gangs and had no criminal convictions but was a brave, possibly foolhardy man. There had been a fight the previous evening between Wilfred Fowler and another and Plommer had made them fight to rules and man to man. Fowler was a Garvin boy, so next evening Garvin and two others made threats against Plommer. Then they caught a tram to the Wicker area in Sheffield and attacked another with razors and a cosh. Meanwhile the Fowlers and others attacked and murdered Plommer. The weapon was thought to be a bayonet. Plommer had manfully but foolishly left his house to fight each of the six one by one. They surrounded him and got him down.

They appealed against their conviction and this was heard on April the 18th 1926 in the Court of Criminal Appeal in London and was dismissed. Defence lawyer Mr. J.W. Fenoughty obtained statements from people and wrote to the Home Secretary Sir William Joynson Hicks with new evidence on Lawrence Fowler. Then two days later he wrote again requesting the Home Secretary to advise His Majesty King George V to grant a reprieve. The devastating reply arrived on 1st September:

“Sir, … I am directed by the Secretary of State to inform you that he has given careful consideration to all the circumstances of the case, and I am to express to you his regret that he has failed to discover any grounds which would justify him in advising His Majesty to interfere with the due course of the law.”

It was signed by the Under Secretary of State for Home Affairs.

The Daily Mail observed on August 20th, “We may hope that the dismissal by the Court of Criminal Appeal of the application for leave to appeal made by the brothers Fowler, found guilty of the murder of a man in Sheffield in brutal circumstances, will have the effect of striking fear into these gangs and breaking them up. Hicks also wrote to the Sheffield authorities asking them to quell the gang attacks!

On the 1st of May 1925, four days after Plommer was murdered, Chief Constable Hall-Dalwood formed the Special Duty Squad. This was the four hardest men in the force. Sgt. Robinson, the leader, had served in the Coldstream Guards; P.C. Walter Loxley 6ft 2in, 19 stone 8lb a war-time Royal Garrison Artillery, in France; as had P.C. Herbert Lunn, who won the Military Medal at Bullecourt for rescuing wounded under heavy fire; the fourth was P.C. Jack Farrily, a hard Irishman, experienced in street fighting. Their orders were to harry and beat the gangsters up.

Prosecuting Solicitor, G.H. Banwell told a court Sergeant Robinson and P.C. Lunn were instructed to prevent the gangs gathering in the City. They became known locally as the “Flying Squad” and were first named in court on September 21st, 1925 in a case over the Junior Park gang. Sgt. Robinson said that serious complaints had been made of members of the public being kicked around a fairground by the gang: “That is why we are on special duty breaking up these gangs.”Two gangsters were locked up – one for six months, the other for three.

There had been frequent assaults on the police by gang members but the “Squad” were specially selected hard men who wore plain clothes and were instructed to go into the pubs used by gang members tell them to get out or beat them up.

The way “The Squad” dealt with a brawl at the Red House, Solly Street on 14th September, 1925 shows the methods they used. In court, “Ganner” Wheywell’s lawyer, Harry Morris, asked P.C. Lunn: ”What Wheywell has done to you, you paid back with 4,000 per cent interest?” Lunn replied: ”I do not look at it like that. I only did my duty, knowing the man as I do. Then under further questioning: “These men have been ganging together. No licensees in Sheffield want them. They will only serve them through fear. We have had enough of gangs.”

Mr. Barnwell then asked,”Are you one of the Flying Squad?” “Yes”... “And your main duty is that of a sort of disturbance queller?” “Yes, principally.”

Mr. Morris explained that Wheywell had summonsed first and this was in the nature of a test case. There is a system of assaults on these men. But that would be a substitution of an alleged gang terrorism by the police.”
The Doctor who had treated Wheywell at the Royal Infirmary said that his patient “had four fairly large bruises, was dazed and looked as if he had been knocked about.”

Under cross-examination Wheywell described “the Squad” as having launched a “cowardly assault.” The landlord gave evidence for Wheywell and said he did not mind them using his pub. He added that he had not called the police but: "The Sheffield police have told me I must not serve these men. It is through no complaint of mine.”

The case went to the Sessions where the three “Squad” members were acquitted and Wheywell given three months hard labour! The Recorder warned, without conscious irony: “The police must be protected from acts of violence.”

Gangs are usually then as now around a family or close associates - the nucleus. In a case of 11th July the Recorder asked, ”How do you become a member of these gangs?” Albert Foster replied: ”Well Sir, I have known these men for years, from being a boy. As a matter of fact we have been boys together.”

On the 25th of November two defendants appeared in court after being heavily beaten in custody. One Windle was in facial bandages with blood-stained clothes and scarf. In answer to questioning by Harry Morris the defence solicitor: “No, it was through falling.” On another occasion a woman shouted at the police from the gallery: “You’re as bad!”

After six months of the Special Squad Hall-Dalwood had to resign apparently from ill-health but blamed “evil attempts” to undermine him and “insidious influences from outside.” He had had constant conflict with Sheffield Watch Committee to get his force brought up to strength and also to get magistrates to give stronger sentences.

He was replaced by Captain Percy Sillitoe who had served in the South African police. Though Hall-Dalwood had formed “The Squad” it was Sillitoe who became famous as the “Gang breaker” and went on to tackle Glasgow’s “Razor gangs.” He finished his career as Director-General of MI5. He visited America to advise J. Edgar Hoover on combating Chicago’s more stylish gangsters.

Sillitoe followed where Col. Hall-Dalwood had led and made important innovations like adding P.C. Pat Geraghty who was 6ft 5in tall and could pick up five tennis balls in one hand. Sillitoe had the “squad” trained in Ju Jitso by European champion Harry Hunter. To support the magistrates Sillitoe went to the court cases to back his men and take responsibility for the sentences. His first appearance was on 28th September. It was over the arrest of a husband and wife for fighting each other. When a crowd had gathered and tried to free them. The “Squad” were as bad as the gangsters but with indifferent authorities had to take illegal but drastic measures to restore order to the city and protect innocent people.

In his autobiography “Cloak Without a Dagger” captain Sir Percy Sillitoe gave this insight into human nature: “There is only one way to deal with the gangster mentality. You must show that you are not afraid. If you stand up to them and they realise you mean business they will knuckle under. The element of beast in man whether it comes from an unhappy and impoverished background, or from his own undisciplined lustful appetites, will respond exactly as a wild beast of the jungle responds – to nothing but greater force and greater firmness of purpose.”