THE NEXT ICE AGE - NOW!

Smoothly, the inaccuracies of climate computer models are dismissed as
“uncertainties” resulting in “divergent predictions.”

The subtext of the war is the deliberate destruction of human
life on the planet on a mass scale.

9 Mar 10 - (Excerpts) - Right now the world is engaged in the latest
battle of a “climate war” that has been going on since the 1970s when
the Club of Rome concluded in a report titled, “The real enemy then, is
humanity itself”, that the world’s population had to be reduced.

Whereas wars in the modern era have killed millions and communism as
practiced in the former Soviet Union and the early decades of Red China
under Chairman Mao killed millions more on a scale with which war could
not compete, the advocates of population reduction rival the worst
despots to have ever walked among us.

Billions are at stake so far as the “climate scientists” are concerned.
They have received millions for their research in the United States and
in England. Presumably other nations, too, have provided such grants and
the result of the research must always be a continuation of the “global
warming” fraud. Beyond the scientists are those who profit from the sale
of “carbon credits” to permit “greenhouse gas emissions”, and the
millions that environmental organizations such as Friends of the Earth,
the
Sierra Club, and others rake in.

It is no surprise, then, that those who have been victimized by the
fraud will see a coordinated campaign of opinion editorials in
newspapers, advertisements, and other means to keep the “global warming”
fraud intact. These efforts have been renamed “climate change”, but
therein lies the utter mendacity of the campaign because the Earth has
always passed through cycles of climate change and always will.

On February 15th, the Boston Globe published an opinion editorial by
Kerry Emanuel, the director of the Program in Atmosphere, Oceans, and
Climate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It was filled with
the usual “global warming” themes; the repetition of the lie that carbon
dioxide and other minor atmospheric gases are causing a huge shift that
is warming the Earth. Smoothly, the inaccuracies of climate computer
models are dismissed as “uncertainties” resulting in “divergent
predictions.”

At best, if your local weatherman can accurately predict what will occur
in the next two to four days, he’s doing fine.

Predicting what the climate—not the weather—will be decades and even
centuries from now is pure fiction. It is the claim that is central to
“global warming” and/or “climate change.”

In a rebuttal to Emanuel’s opinion editorial, Bill Gray, Professor
Emeritus, Colorado State
University, noted that “A high percentage of meteorologists and/or
climate scientists do not agree that the climate changes we have seen
are mostly man-made. Thousands of us think that the larger part of the
climate changes we have observed over the last century are of natural
origin.” He added, “Over 31,000 American scientists have recently signed
a petition advising the U.S. not to sign any fossil fuel reduction
treaty.”

Myron Ebell, director of the
Competitive Enterprise Institute, has just released a statement
based on the release of still more emails between desperate “climate
scientists” whose
careers depend on the “global warming” fraud.

“According to recently disclosed e-mails from a National Academies of
Science listserv, prominent climate scientists affiliated with the
U.S. National Academies of Science, have been planning a public campaign
to paper over the damaged reputation of global warming alarmism.”

The emails explored the ways the public could be distracted from the
revelations of Climategate and enticed back to believing that “global
warming” is based in real science and occurring. Among the suggestions
were “Op eds in the NY Times and other national newspapers would also be
great.”

Referring to this as a climate war is no exaggeration.

What the public has never grasped is that this is not a science-based
war. It is entirely political in nature and the Green’s enemy has been
the resource industries, oil, natural gas, and coal, that provide the
means by which energy is generated for industrial use and for societies
that depend on electricity to function. The subtext of the war is the
deliberate destruction of human life on the planet on a mass scale.

That explains why it is especially troubling that President Obama
continues to refer to global warming as real, and advocates
“cap-and-trade” legislation, the largest tax on energy use in the
history of mankind. It is the reason he continues to divert millions to
“clean energy” and “green jobs”, neither of which have ever proven to
equal traditional energy sources or provide sufficient employment to
merit support.

So now the climate wars shift into a new phase, one intended to
obfuscate and confuse the public again in the quest to foist the
greatest fraud and attack on mankind in human history.