http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6268
Summary: [XSLFO] fo:folio-prefix (and other) content
Product: XSLFO
Version: 1.1
Platform: All
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-
editors/2007JulSep/0007
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSL-FO
AssignedTo: alb.w3c@gmail.com
ReportedBy: Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com
QAContact: xsl-editors@w3.org
This question applies at least to fo:folio-prefix, fo:folio-suffix, but also
seems to apply to fo:index-page-number-prefix, fo:index-page-number-suffix,
fo:index-page-citation-list-separator, and
fo:index-page-citation-range-separator.
Each of these objects has the following content model:
(#PCDATA | %inline;)*.
The question: From whom do the child objects inherit properties? The use of
the term "static" for some of these seems to imply that they inherit
normally, that is, by reference to their ancestors in the tree. However,
that seems unlikely. It is easy, for example, to imagine an
fo:page-number-citation with a 12-point "Glossary-" prefix surrounded by
10-point text in a footnote. Am I correct to assume that instead this
content should be "grafted" in a manner similar to the way that fo:marker
content inherits from the fo:retrieve-marker that it replaces? Or would the
fo:page-number-citation need to explicitly set the font-size to the correct
value?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.