Over the past weeks, we all watched in sadness as wildfires in Colorado’s Black Forest raged out of control, destroying more than 500 homes and displacing nearly 40,000 people. As first responders battled the fires, critical tools that could have assisted them on the front lines — unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) — largely sat idle because of government regulations.

Unmanned aircraft could make firefighters’ jobs both easier and safer, providing them with situational awareness by flying through smoke and at night, situations too dangerous for piloted aircraft. UAS can see through smoke to identify hotspots, help forecasters predict the weather, drop fire retardants and alert authorities to people and property in harm’s way.

In spite of these obvious benefits, before a firefighter is allowed to deploy a UAS, they must first get approval from the Federal Aviation Administration. When fires are burning and spreading by the minute, this process often makes it difficult, if not impossible, to get timely approval to fly.

As a result, the U.S. Forest Service recently reported that it won’t be able to use the technology this year in the Northwest. In addition, current rules sometimes require that a chase airplane follow UAS for safety reasons, negating the benefits of unmanned aircraft and jeopardizing the people this technology is aimed to protect.

The limitations of manned flight can have serious consequences. Last year, 13 people were killed by wildfires, including several firefighters who died in an airplane crash. And every year, wildfires destroy billions of dollars in homes and property. In 2012 alone, these fires burned 9.3 million acres in states like Colorado, California and Utah, causing $1.2 billion in damage.

To ensure our first responders have access to this life saving technology, we, as an industry and as a nation, must help the FAA figure out the safety rules of the air so specific approval is not required for every mission. Until these rules are written, this promising technology will not be used to its fullest potential.

The good news is that legislation passed last year by Congress would pave the way for the integration of unmanned aircraft into the U.S. airspace by directing the FAA to write safety rules by 2015. Although the FAA has missed a few of the congressionally mandated timelines for UAS integration, progress is being made, including the ongoing selection process to create six UAS test sites around the country, expected to be completed by the end of this year. But we can – and must – do better.

Beyond assisting firefighters, UAS have a host of other societal and economic benefits. For example, UAS will help farmers survey their crops more effectively, allowing them to save money on pesticides and irrigation. They will help the energy sector monitor its pipelines and transmission lines, both on-and-off shore, and they will revolutionize how we study weather and wildlife. In fact, the UAS industry is expected to boost our economy significantly, creating more than 100,000 jobs over 10 years for a total of $82 billion in economic impact.

Indeed, UAS is the future of aviation and a new economic frontier. The U.S. currently leads the world in this technology. However, other nations are quickly catching up; already using UAS for civil and commercial purposes.

The wildfires in Colorado and other Western states underscore the importance of integrating UAS technology as soon as possible, and certainly no later than September 2015, the deadline Congress established. Our firefighters need ready access to all of the available tools to help them fight and contain these blazes. Moreover, in the limited circumstances where UAS have been deployed to assist firefighters, their value has been readily apparent. For example, in 2009 the Alaska Fire Service used a UAS to fly over a massive fire burning an area half the size of Rhode Island, which was producing thick smoke that prevented manned aircraft from flying. The UAS was able to take infrared images of the fire at night, giving firefighters valuable information during a dangerous situation.

Sadly, this year’s wildfire season is off to a forceful start. The tools and technology that could help fight fires more safely and effectively are available. While the complex and restrictive regulatory environment has slowed their deployment, the integration of unmanned aircraft will put these critical tools within easy reach of first responders. The integration must proceed swiftly — without any further delays — to help fight fires more effectively, saving money, saving property and most important, saving lives.

Michael Toscano is president and CEO of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International in
Shirlington, Va.

Michael,The problem is they showed up at a 3 acre fire and as usual they set around discussing it and coming up with a plan instead of putting the small fire out. What a bunch of do-nothings and we pay these people. And now they are backslapping each other and should be ashamed of the screw-up they caused. Leadership needs to be fired and sued.

Proponents of the drone (unmanned aerial vehicles) industry are pushing drone use for their supposed economic benefit to Colorado. Any benefit would come at a great cost to our privacy, safety and overall quality of life.

Drones have the capability of carrying a variety of weapons, including 12-guage shot guns, tear gas, rubber bullet guns, bombs and missiles.

Drones have the capability to watch individuals, groups and populations on a 24-hour basis, following and recording their movements for days and weeks, and for the largest drones, even years.

Drones have the capability to continuously monitor cell phone and text messaging of individuals, groups and populations. Anyone — your neighbor, a teen — can monitor you with this technology.

Anyone can buy a small drone at Radio Shack and many places online.

An angry teenager can target schoolmates, fly the drone onto a playground and fire away or drop a pipe bomb. The drone can simply fly off and there will be no evidence left behind for finding the perpetrator.

An angry or aggrieved person can use a drone to stalk someone.

A drone can drop a bomb at any large gathering: a football game, a marathon. There would be no evidence left behind for finding the perpetrators.

A drone can follow a child and force that child into a car or house.

Go to stopspydrones.com to learn what you can do about them. We must say “no” to drones before they get off the ground.

most drones can carry very little, specialized ones are needed to carry weapons. Monitoring cell phones and text? not really, all cell service is now digital and encrypted now. Drones at radioshack? no, just little remote control helicopters, that can fly a few minutes, can’t get more than around 20 feet high, and could carry only a few ounces. guns and pipe bombs are heavy, and guns have recoil that would break the toy drones available at stores, as well as send them spinning out of control and crash them into the ground.

Vincent Carroll is The Denver Post's editorial page editor. He has been writing commentary on politics and public policy in Colorado since 1982 and was originally with the Rocky Mountain News, where he was also editor of the editorial pages until that newspaper gave up the ghost in 2009.

Guidelines: The Post welcomes letters up to 150 words on topics of general interest. Letters must include full name, home address, day and evening phone numbers, and may be edited for length, grammar and accuracy.

To reach the Denver Post editorial page by phone: 303-954-1331

Posts by Category

Posts by Category

Idea Log Archives

Idea Log Archives

About The Idea Log

The idea log The Denver Post editorial board shares commentary and opinion on issues of interest to Coloradans.