Archive for November, 2017

I’ll just say up front where I’m going with this. We obviously have a problem with sexual harassment and abuse, but if you think Republicans are bad, just realize that Democrats are proving themselves to be truly evil. You won’t find a story describing the number of Republicans facing charges of harassment or abuse compared to the number of Democrats currently facing those charges because there are a LOT of Democrats currently facing those charges and the media protects and shelters Democrats just as they did when Bill Clinton was being accused of these things and much, much worse. And, to continue, if you think it’s bad in America, go to a country that does not have a Judeo-Christian tradition to see what sexual harassment and abuse truly looks like – and you will be shocked at how good America is by comparison. I am going to submit to you that the problem is sin and our sin nature, and that sexuality is deep within the beast that is man, and the only way to get the man to reign in the beast is to literally scare the hell out of him. Which is impossible when that man has been steeped in a worldview that ridicules hell. Again, sexuality burns hot and deep in the beast that is man; and if there is no God, if there is no heaven and no hell, then there is nothing – NOTHING – beyond your opinion versus my opinion. A partisan vote or a media propaganda poll or for that matter a legitimate vote or opinion poll among human beings has NOTHING to do with what is right or wrong: a majority doesn’t make right any more than might makes right. But when we return to the realization that yes, we ARE all truly created in the Imago Dei, and that male and female He created us, then we have the basis for not only returning to a culture that veers back from the vile sexual values that secular liberal human progressives have been perverting us into, but a true foundation built on God and upon eternal truths that are truly right and there are things that are truly evil. And that abusing a girl or a woman created in God’s image is in the category of evil even if a lot of people disagree. We have a degenerate problem and we desperately need a transcendent solution. That’s my synopsis.

It wasn’t all that long ago that Vice President Mike Pence made a statement that shouldn’t have garnered him anything but respect and even praise, but instead resulted in widespread ridicule and condemnation: he said that he would not be alone with a woman not his wife and would never attend any event with alcohol if his wife were not with him.

It’s easy to make jokes about, and it’s also easy to argue that this is nobody’s business but the Pences’. But there’s a deeply troubling worldview at work here, one that has profound implications for policy — and we’re already seeing it play out at both the state and federal levels.

Let’s take just a moment to consider this pair of rules Mike Pence has for himself. He obviously thinks that every interaction he has with a woman is so sexually charged that it’s safe to be around them only if there are other people there, too. Unless someone might be drinking, in which case even the presence of a crowd isn’t enough to prevent … something from happening. There’s little distance between that perspective and that of the ultra-Orthodox Jews who refuse to sit next to a woman on an airplane, or the fundamentalist Muslims who demand that women be covered head to toe to contain the unstoppable sexual allure that renders men unable to control their urges.

That was March 30 of this year.

Pence was stating that he would never allow himself to be in a position where he could harass or abuse a woman, nor would he ever allow himself to be in a position where he could ever be accused either rightly or wrongly for having harassed or abused a woman. He would represent himself as a man of integrity. And truly despicable people slimed him for it.

May I offer something that no liberal progressive will never comprehend called “moral clarity”??? The accusation that Mike Pence stating that he made a moral decision to govern his own behavior is akin to Islamic culture forcing women to cover themselves displays a degree of such moral idiocy and frankly such political bias that it is so far beneath contempt to be unreal. When it comes to morality and moral decency, liberal progressives are literally both schizophrenic and psychotic. They have no grasp of moral reality whatsoever.

I’m going to say a few things about Roy Moore now: first being that, very unlike Democrats with first Al Franken (even with photographs of the turd in the act proving his guilt) and then John Conyers (who acknowledged his guilt in a legal settlement for sexual harassment), Republicans IMMEDIATELY distanced themselves from Roy Moore. Oh, no, you did NOT have a Majority Leader Mitch McConnell attempt to justify Moore hanging around the way we awkwardly watched a Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi try to justify the unjustifiable.

Amazingly, ABC News immediately “reached out” to all 52 Republicans for their reaction to the allegations against Roy Moore. I could find no example of any major media outlet attempting to pin down THE 46 Democrats and the 2 supposedly “independents” who always cast their vote with the Democrats on their reaction to Al Franken and the numerous allegations against him. Some of which are evidenced by PHOTOGRAPHS of Franken IN THE ACT. The Republican example was THE very top hit on the page to answer my Google search. Whereas I looked through six pages of Google hits when I changed the search phrase from Senators Republicans respond Roy Moore to Senators Democrats respond Al Franken. The closest thing I could find was from a source called “conservativereview.com.” Which pointed out that at the time of its article, not ONE Democrat Senator had called for Al Franken to resign. Rather, the only call was for a “Senate ethics investigation” which has never ONCE failed to expel a Senator since 1861 no matter how heinous any Senator ever acted. For the record, the one “journalistic” news agency that most definitely did NOT “reach out” to all the Democrats in the Senate over Al Franken was ABC News which immediately played that trick to Republicans over Moore.

The reason Republicans are so often utter cowards is because whenever anybody says or does anything offensive in our culture, you can bet that the media will cavalry itself over to every single Republican for a reaction and force them to go on the record fer or agin. You never see that behavior with the media when the offensive words or deeds would embarrass Democrats.

“But he’s… he’s an ARTIST!” the left says. You know, because Beyoncé shouldn’t be forced to write or sing music condemning homosexuality the way that other artists like wedding photographers and bakers and custom-designers ought to be forced to condone the homosexuality that flagrantly flies in the face of their Christian biblical values. Because “art” is subjective, you see, and only liberalism qualifies as the sole critic of “art.” Mind you, Hollywood has been as racist as they have been religiously bigoted, with back-to-back years of all white nominees until political correctness forced them to pick some token negroes.

You have to apply a different standard to liberal progressives. They’re better than everyone else, you see. They deserve special treatment. In fact, the class that creates “entitlements” are “entitled” to special treatment. I know that Hitler ruined the term “master race” for everyone, and so we have to come up with a different name to describe what liberal progressives think of themselves.

And now ABC News has left in place its Political Director Mark Halperin. ABC has done this despite the network’s acknowledgement that Halperin wrote a memo that to many seems to direct ABC reporters, anchors and producers to slant its coverage by downplaying the misstatements of Democratic presidential candidate Senator John Kerry and by viewing negatively any misstatements by Republican candidate Bush.

I’ve been saying it for years now. These people are as dishonest as the sun is hot.

And now think of who was administering that bias. Take a moment to realize that when conservatives called these people “fake news,” it amounted to FLATTERY compared to what they truly are and always have been. Because all these people who are such miserable roaches it is beyond unreal get to write our news for us. These morally-diseased slimebags get to tell us what is true and what is false.

And now we all know why: because all the damn liberal progressives were systematically abusing women, too.

Just remember what the Democratic Party taught us just in the 90s alone: that a young woman getting on her knees to give a powerful man blowjobs in the workplace office is perfectly A-OK, and that all the women who accuse such powerful men of any misconduct are trailer trash and you can patently disregard anything they say.

We can look at the college and university campuses that are steeped in secular humanist progressive liberalism and see the shocking statistics of sexual assault. Their very own worldview created this toxic system. There’s been a more than 200% increase in assaults on college campuses; and women are more likely to be sexually assaulted on those bastions of secular humanist progressive liberal values than damn near anywhere else.

Now, I have just in the space above categorically demonstrated and documented that liberal progressives have absolutely no right and no platform to lecture anyone about the treatment of women or what is good or bad for women. They themselves are a massive part of the damn problem.

If liberal progressives or Democrats want to pretend that the answer lies in education or “sexual harassment training,” allow me to simply state from the outset that the very ones “training” everyone else are themselves sexual predators and sexual harassers.

And anyone who wants to tell me that “we need more women” has to deal with the fact that women have overwhelmingly voted for these horrible, awful people. Women are part of this too. And women are corrupt. I think of all the women who knew damn well what was going on and kept their mouths shut because the rapists and the sexual harassers were Democrats and they were ideologues who put their politics first and everything else second.

I think of liberal “journalist” Cokie Roberts who said that she knew for YEARS that John Conyers was a serial sexual harasser or worst and that “We all knew to avoid getting in an elevator with Rep. Conyers.” But he was a Democrat, so we just took the stairs, let him prey on the stupid girls who didn’t know not to get in that elevator, and kept our mouths shut. Because to open our mouths around Democrat men involves a penis being shoved in. But we sure weren’t going to out this Democrat.

And the reason is that liberal-progressive so-called “feminists” have indoctrinated the belief that “being a woman” is numerically identical to “being a baby murderer,” such that if you don’t murder babies or believe that human life ought to have any sacred dignity whatsoever, you cannot qualify as a “woman.”

Mind you, these same liberal-progressive so-called “feminists” have arbitrarily decided that any man who decides he’s a woman IS a woman.

Understand that there are consequences to the idea that there is nothing whatsoever that is sacred about the dignity of human life.

Just like Nazism, an idea that began decades before the death camps and Zyclon B, ideas have consequences.

represent our unwillingness to give up on the notion that there is meaning out there expressed in human terms, which is a kind of ultimate hubris.

Try to comprehend that any “morality” is a fabrication:

Asian Homo erectus died without issue and does not enter our immediate ancestry (for we evolved from African populations); Neanderthal people were collateral cousins, perhaps already living in Europe while we emerged in Africa… In other words, we are an improbable and fragile entity, fortunately successful after precarious beginnings as a small population in Africa, not the predictable end result of a global tendency. We are a thing, an item of history, not an embodiment of general principles.

A female is a human being, but the embryo is also a Homo Sapiens. And that argument is actually true where Goebbels’ is intellectual evolutionary gibberish only if evolution is true and God is not. Otherwise, we make up our own rules: the Jew is human if we allow the Jew to be human and the Jew is not human if we decide by popular vote or by dictator’s decree is not. Barack Obama gave us all a classic example of this when he assured us that marriage was between one man and one woman until he decided it wasn’t.

In a recent book, A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion,10 authors Randy Thornhill and Craig T. Palmer claim that rape is “a natural, biological phenomenon that is a product of the human evolutionary heritage,” just like “the leopard’s spots and the giraffe’s elongated neck.” In other words, rape is a biological “adaptation” that allows undesirable males the opportunity to pass on their genes. According to Randy Thornhill, “Every feature of every living thing, including human beings, has an underlying evolutionary background. That’s not a debatable matter.” According to the anthropology department at the University of California Santa Barbara, “That rape might be an adaptation is a reasonable hypothesis to pursue, and the proper framework is intersexual conflict.”11 If rape is just an evolutionary adaptation, then how can it be immoral?

The Bible says that morality is a result of choices that people make, and not the result of some conditioned evolutionary response. Is there any experimental evidence supporting this viewpoint? In a newly released book, Three Seductive Ideas, Harvard University psychologist, Jerome Kagan, makes the claim (and backs it up with experimental evidence) that humans are radically different from every other species of life on earth. Dr. Kagan refutes the ideas of evolutionary psychologists, including “infant determinism” (the idea that all human behavior is set by age 2) hedonism (the idea that all human behavior is motivated by a desire to maximize pleasure and minimize pain), and “abstractionism” (the idea that all human behavior is controlled by a limited set of laws or rules). He points out that men who committed terrible atrocities had loving parents during their childhood years and that “evolutionary arguments are used to cleanse greed, promiscuity, and abuse of stepchildren of moral taint.” Instead, Dr. Kagan shows that humans are a special creation, endowed with a spiritual nature, and motivated by a desire to maintain a feeling of virtue, which is unique among sentient animals. He points out that there are no non-human animal models for human pride, shame, and guilt. Humans also appreciate the difference between moral right and wrong. According to Dr. Kagan, “Not even the cleverest ape could be conditioned to be angry upon seeing one animal steal food from another.” According to a recent review of the book in Science, “The idea of the duality of human nature (of meaning over and above mechanism, or mind over and above mechanism, of angel over and above beast), and of the remarkable discontinuity of human nature from everything that came before, is alive and well for Kagan precisely because he has such a high regard for facts.”12

The Bible makes a startling claim about human nature and it makes that startling claim over and over again:

Now the earth was corrupt in the sight of God, and the earth was filled with violence. God looked on the earth, and behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way upon the earth — Genesis 6:11-12

For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God — Romans 3:23

“When they sin against You (for there is no man who does not sin) and You are angry with them and deliver them to an enemy, so that they take them away captive to the land of the enemy, far off or near — 1 Kings 8:46

as it is written, “THERE IS NONE RIGHTEOUS, NOT EVEN ONE — Romans 3:10

For all of us have become like one who is unclean, And all our righteous deeds are like a filthy garment; And all of us wither like a leaf, And our iniquities, like the wind, take us away. — Isaiah 64:6

Indeed, there is not a righteous man on earth who continually does good and who never sins. — Ecclesiastes 7:20

There is a God. That is why we are held to an objective moral standard which does not change the way secular – or should I now start calling it “sexular” – humanist liberal progressive pseudo-morality changes practically every damn day. There simply is no such thing as “objective morality” to a liberal. There are zero grounds for that. “Morality” for them is an opinion poll, and usually from a doctored survey, at that. And so, no, there is nothing objectively morally wrong with rape or any other kind of sexual harassment with liberal progressives, according to their moral system. And to whatever extent they even actually HAVE a “moral system,” they are so hypocritical and filled with so many perverted double-talking double standards that we are right to mock these self-righteous preening modern-day Pharisees for whatever “morality” they now claim to stand for.

There IS something called “sin,” and we are ALL guilty of it. Some of us are more guilty than others, and yes, I truly do believe that there will be levels of reward in heaven and there will be levels of suffering in hell. But there is something called “sin,” and sin is anything we think, say or do that is in violation with the character of God because:

God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. — Genesis 1:27

And our holy, righteous Creator holds us each and every one accountable to the image of God, the Imago Dei, that He instilled every single human being with.

That is why we are ALL valuable as human beings, male and female, and it is why Democrats are murderers to the tune of 60 million babies which is tenfold more murderous than the Nazis in the Holocaust and counting.

The Bible tells us that “it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment” (Hebrews 9:27). The Bible tells us that “God sees not as man sees, for man looks at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7). We’re told that God “will bring every act to judgment, everything which is hidden, whether it is good or evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:14). On the last day, on Judgment Day, that every human being whether small or great will face, every act, every thought, every intent, every word will be revealed and will be judged. And God will not allow even ONE sin, one sinner whose sins are detected, into His heaven. Atheists and Secular humanist liberal progressives mock this and viciously attack the God of the Bible. They call Him “judgmental,” which is a VERY JUDGMENTAL thing for them to do, especially given HE has the right to judge them as their Creator and they don’t have the right to judge HIM. But the reality of heaven and the reality of the other destiny of hell are the basis for any true morality. Why should I be good and not evil? Why should I be good and not evil if I am powerful in this world and can get away with it? One reason: because “you may be sure that your sin will find you out” (Numbers 32:23).

Let me contrast this with the teachings of Jesus. Most people don’t know this, and the disinformation-hate-spewing dogma toward Christianity by the secular humanist liberal progressive “education system” will never tell you: but Jesus had FEMALE disciples. Matthew chapter 28 and Luke chapter 24 records that the very first eyewitnesses to the Resurrected Jesus were WOMEN. We have several of these women named in Luke 24:10: Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, as well as other women who followed Jesus. What is interesting is that women were not allowed to testify in Jewish court during the time of Jesus, but Jesus allowed the honor that his very first witnesses be women. Jesus TAUGHT women, which was UNHEARD Of for a Jewish rabbit during the time of Jesus. The word for “disciple” is used in its feminine form to describe female Christians in Acts 9:36. Jesus was a true revolutionary who restored to women the rights and freedoms they should have had as co-image-bearers of God (Gen 1:27). The New Testament repeatedly warns Christians, most especially men, to avoid things like “fornication” and “adultery” that secular humanist liberal progressives openly mock and revile and ridicule.

Women do not need secular humanist progressive liberalism or the Democratic Party that champions that vile worldview: what women need is JESUS and the Christianity that truly seeks to follow their Lord and their Savior.

One of the things that liberalism gave us is rampant pornography and the pornification of our culture. There are ALL KINDS of studies that document on this degraded and despicable act of Democratic Party liberalism upon our culture and upon the male mind. Quote from a Harvard study:

The first way in which pornography undermines some males’ internal inhibitions against acting out their desires to rape is by objectifying women.

To whatever extent that “feminists” today are starting to turn on pornography as a demon that feeds male lust and reduces male inhibitions to carry out the desires they were taught watching degrading pornography, the same school of “feminism” was saying the EXACT opposite thing, claiming that “we have a right to our bodies!” and with the assistance of Democrat-appointed judges who professed abject moral stupidity in being unable to see a difference between porn and art they imposed this incredibly toxic, cancerous worldview and sexually-depraved view on our culture. When Christians who wanted to follow the clear teachings of the Holy Bible pleaded with secular humanist liberal progressives, please don’t DO this awful thing!

Please understand, the Greek/New Testament word translated “fornication” that secular humanist progressive liberals and Democrats have mocked and ridiculed is “pornea.” You’re not that dumb to not see where I’m clearly going, and where Christians went in the 1970s when morally depraved and morally stupid liberals declared it to be harmless and a right (even as they argued that the clear rights given to Americans in the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution are NOT rights!). Liberal justices invented this “right” out of perverted ideology. And it has toxified our culture. And today the same Democrats who began the process of degrading and perverting our culture continue full-speed ahead as they ignore all legitimate biological science to similarly INVENT new sexual genders and orientations on a nearly daily basis now. For the record, God created TWO and ONLY two: they are called “male and female.”

For the scientific record, that same legitimate biological science also tells us that when a male sperm cell and a female egg are joined together, they form a genetically unique human being that is therefore genetically different from the mother or the father. It is NOT “your body.” It is a separate and unique child’s body. That zygote is a being by virtue of the fact that it is alive and it is human by virtue of its parents: IT IS A HUMAN BEING. And any legitimate scientific analysis of the cells of that human being would reveal an organism that is rigorously scientifically classified in the following manner:

Just like you and me, pal. A zygote is a human being in an embryonic stage as much as a teenager is a human being in an adolescent stage. And any parent can tell you there is FAR more justifiable reason to kill the latter than there is the former.

Abortion is based on the premise that at the moment of conception – and literally even up to the very moment of delivery – that is NOT a baby in the womb; that is NOT a precious human being. It’s a thing inside a woman’s body and so it’s her property and so she can kill it. And so at the moment of conception, does a father father a child? No! Not if abortion is legitimate!!! He has merely contributed to an inanimate, nonsentient lump of goop and nothing more. And what is his “fatherhood” worth when the thing he conceived is a worthless thing that can be killed at a whim?

In Satan’s hatred for God and contempt for Fatherhood, fathers are NOT fathers and have NO right to their children. Given that fatherhood has been trivialized to nothing, given that fathers are now denied the most basic right to even the very life of their own children, given the destruction of what was once the sacred bond of marriage, the glue that kept fathers cemented to their families has been dissolved.

Let me tell you something: Democrats LOVE the fact that they have warped our culture into one composed of single, unmarried women who live in homes without the father of their child/ren. Because they have exploited these women their policies created such that 70% of single, unmarried women vote DEMOCRAT.

Understand something, single, unmarried woman: Democrats are sick, twisted, perverted, warped people who do not WANT you to be happy, do not WANT your children to grow up stable, do not WANT you to have a dream of living in your own home with your loving husband who is the father of your beautiful, well-adjusted children. Because you would vote these DemocRats right out of office. And that is simply a statistical fact. The longer DEMOn-possessed-bureauCRATS can keep you down, women, the longer they can isolate you, keep you without a husband and a father to your kids, the longer they can keep you in grinding poverty, on welfare, desperate, without a true man to love you and keep you and stay beside you, the longer you will keep giving them what they want.

Anyway, the problem is something that secular humanist liberal progressives mock is spelled S-I-N. And we are ALL sinners. So let me get back to Roy Moore. Yes, it is possible he did what the women accusers claim he did going back forty years ago. Sin extends to all human beings. Even Christians. The Bible teaches that unbelievers have a sin nature and believers have two natures: the godly nature that comes from the Holy Spirit and the old human natures. And we have to learn how to reign in our old sinful natures that remain with us. And that includes our sexual “issues.”

We are sinners, and sinners need a Savior. We need Jesus. The Bible assures us that God created us in His image, and part of that image is eternity. The Bible says that God set eternity in our hearts (Ecclesisates 3:11). God created heaven and God created hell. Both are real. Our destiny is to be in one or the other. And the thing is that God cannot allow any sin – ANY sin – into heaven or heaven, which is perfect, cannot be heaven. And so everyone and everything that is allowed into heaven will be morally pure and perfect.

But the Bible says quite clearly that we are all sinners. Which is quite a problem for us, one that we cannot solve or hope to solve on our own. God created us and created us in HIS image. And we are held accountable to that image.

But the Bible also teaches us that the very God who created us in His image assumed OUR image, added a human nature to His deity, and came to earth to represent sinful humanity. And while we all sinned, Christ Jesus never sinned once in anything He ever thought, said or did. He perfectly represented the sinless, pure righteousness of a holy Creator God. And we can have our sins washed away by His blood because after living that perfect life on our behalf, representing me, He died to pay for my sins. Because the wages of sin is death (Romans 3:23). And so Jesus conquered the power of sin, and because He is God and death cannot hold God, Jesus rose again bodily from the dead. And He conquered the power of sin and the power of death. And therefore my eternal destiny is heaven because my sins do not exist when God looks at me through the perfect righteousness of Christ.

And when I believe that, when I believe that Christ died for my sins according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:3), and that He rose again from the dead according to the Scriptures (1 Cor 15:4), and I declare that with my mouth in faith, something happens. Yes, you can still sin, but now there is also a new nature implanted within you, a nature that unlike your sin nature does NOT want to sin, but to obey the Christ who placed that nature within you. Jesus told us that the Holy Spirit within us convicts us of sin and righteousness and judgment (John 16:8-10). Unlike the “righteousness” of secular humanist liberal progressives, this righteousness and sin and judgment are NOT based on constantly shifting human standards that mean nothing, but come from the character and nature and power of the Living Creator God who will one day hold every single human being who has ever been born to account.

And when I truly believe these things, when I truly have God’s Spirit living within me, there is simply something inside me that won’t let me do the things we see in our culture.

If there is no hell, there are no consequences for evil. And there is absolutely no reason not to allow evil to have free reign. The bottom line is this: all atheism requires is to believe there is no God and all agnosticism requires is to doubt God; in either case, there IS no moral system. There IS no moral disqualification to atheism or agnosticism. Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Chairman Mao, Pol Pot and the Kim dynasty in North Korea were and are all perfectly fulfilled atheists who murdered well over 100 million innocent human beings JUST IN PEACETIME ALONE. One can be a perfectly consistent atheist or agnostic and be a complete moral monster in a way that is impossible to be a Christian claiming to truly follow Jesus and be a moral monster. Because Jesus was righteous and calls upon His followers to be righteous. Any and all “moral” rules these people come up with are first of all self-serving and hypocritical and second of all nothing but shifting sand that will change as the winds of political correctness blow. Which is why Bill Clinton was never guilty of rape even though he had credible accusers and numerous instances of sexual assault and sexual harassment even though there were numerous accusers, but today Roy Moore was pilloried as guilty merely because women said something and therefore had to be believed. Even Hillary Clinton has implicitly acknowledged that by the standard that she currently espouses, her husband and the man who still most represents the Democratic Party and Democrat values belongs in a prison cell doing hard time for his outrageous and depraved violence toward women. Back then, Democrats claimed that all the women who said Bill assaulted them or worse should NOT be believed, and mocked them by claiming that they were trailer trash.

If you think all this crap that you are seeing going on all around you is wrong, then you turn to the antidote to sin: you turn to the only way out of sin, past sin, through sin. You turn to Jesus.

Liberal progressives have now thoroughly proven that their way may seem right to them and even to a depraved culture, but in the end it is the way of death (Proverbs 14:12). The Bible warns about them and their ways: they say what God declares is evil and what they declare is good, but they are in for a terrifying end (Isaiah 5:20).

That’s the bottom line. And liberals are themselves proving that what the Word of God declared centuries ago remains as true today as when God first declared it.

Either Al Franken needs to resign or be impeached and expelled from the Senate with full Democratic Party participation, or Roy Moore needs to be elected.

I’ve watched the fiasco of the Roy Moore allegations – and Moore’s poor responses to those allegations – with growing horror. But I am just as outraged that women would wait for 38 years to bring charges against a man who has been in public service for nearly his entire life – including a high profile Republican primary runoff in which Moore defeated a Republican candidate supported by Donald Trump and the entire GOP establishment – without saying so much as “boo.” ONLY when Moore wins that runoff and ONLY when it is too late to even remove his name from the ballot according to Alabama law, does the self-acknowledged biased Washington Post put out this story.

I am forced to acknowledge that the Moore allegations might be true; but it is every bit as obvious that this was nothing short of a political hitjob where politics and ideology, rather than any issues with “women,” were at the heart of the left’s attack.

What is amazing to me now is that liberals and feminists are actually revisiting charges against Bill Clinton. Remember him? Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broaderick (among many other victims of Bill Clinton’s lust problems) sure do. And back then, liberals and feminists rabidly supported Bill. Because none of these “feminists” have ever ONCE given a flying damn about actual “women.”

Of the Clinton accusers, the one who haunts me is Broaddrick. The story she tells about Clinton recalls those we’ve heard about Weinstein. She claimed they had plans to meet in a hotel coffee shop, but at the last minute he asked to come up to her hotel room instead, where he raped her. Five witnesses said she confided in them about the assault right after it happened. It’s true that she denied the rape in an affidavit to Paula Jones’s lawyers, before changing her story when talking to federal investigators. But her explanation, that she didn’t want to go public but couldn’t lie to the F.B.I., makes sense. Put simply, I believe her.

Oh, Goldberg parses out some reasons why she didn’t believe Willey and Jones, with the later being just because she was supported by political opponents (which means she shouldn’t believe any of Roy Moore’s accusers, either). But she now believes that Bill Clinton is not merely a sexual harasser, but an actual RAPIST.

Here we have an open acknowledgment from the left that feminists who “saved the 42nd president” were “on the wrong side of history.” They weren’t on the wrong side of history; THEY WERE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF MORALITY. Feminists blatantly and hypocritically sided with evil against good, and wrong against right. Because all that really mattered to them, all that has EVER mattered to them, all that matters to them to this very day, as I will explain, is the ideological left rather than anything else.

The cultural conversation about women, power and sexual misconduct that has consumed the United States in recent weeks has now raised a question that is eagerly promoted by those on the political right just as it discomfits those on the political left: What about Bill? While Fox News and other conservative outlets revive years-old charges against Mr. Clinton to accuse Mr. Moore’s critics of hypocrisy, some liberals say it may be time to rethink their defense of the 42nd president.
Matthew Yglesias, a liberal blogger who once worked at the Center for American Progress, a pillar of the Clinton political world, wrote on Vox.com on Wednesday that “I think we got it wrong” by defending Mr. Clinton in the 1990s and that he should have resigned. Chris Hayes, the liberal MSNBC host, said on Twitter that “Democrats and the center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations against him.”

According to the new morality of the left, versus what the Democrats, liberals and the left have been saying whether about Donald Trump or Roy Moore, is that every single Democrat who has EVER voted for Bill Clinton is a vile sexual predator and enabler of hate against women. Buh-bye, Democrats.

We can properly argue that Roy Moore merely looked at what liberals and feminists and Democrats did for Bill and said, “I want me some of that!”

Let’s just understand something: this stuff dated November 13 are coming out now because of the stuff dated Novemeber 9 against Roy Moore. And you’ve got a lot of very legitimately angry Republicans and conservatives pointing out that virtually ALL of the most rabidly angry Democrats coming out demanding Roy Moore be hung, drawn and quartered without so much benefit as any trial or any presumption of innocence whatsoever had a very different song to sing when Bill was a serial damned rapist getting blowjobs from young girls in the Oval Office. Even his semen on her blue dress matching his DNA didn’t change Democrats’ tune.

They surrounded him and they protected him.

Remember Nina Burleigh, just one of many stunning examples that “journalism” in our nation is a sick, depraved JOKE, who said she would be “happy to give [Bill Clinton] a blowjob just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.” That was said AFTER the Paula Jones story broke!

To be a Democrat is to be a rabid hater of women. And I say that not by my standard, BUT BY THEIR OWN.

Most of the haters of women who have been publicly revealed, such as Harvey Weinstein, are LIBERALS in a VERY LIBERAL INDUSTRY.

So let me explain why liberals and progressives and Democrats and feminists are turning on Bill Clinton [and Hillary] now. The ONLY reason: BECAUSE THEY ARE DONE. Democrats pathologically and rabidly protected Bill and Hillary while they mattered and while they were advancing the leftist agenda. And now they are more of a liability than they are an asset.

And we’ve got this Roy Moore thing and a chance to steal the power balance in the Senate. And that matters right now today. But ohmigod, what we said about our perverts gives the other side the right and even the duty to shelter their perverts. So let’s throw our old perverts under the bus and pretend that we somehow learned something and that will give us the right to scream for Roy Moore’s head in a way that guarantees us a STEAL for a Senate seat that we otherwise could never have possibly ever won.

Okay, but here’s the rub: his name is Al Franken. And he’s a right-now pervert.

And we don’t have accusations: we have PICTURES!!!

The actress says that Al Franken kissed and groped her against her will and she has PROOF.

As a TV host and sports broadcaster, as well as a model familiar to the audience from the covers of FHM, Maxim and Playboy, I was only expecting to emcee and introduce the acts, but Franken said he had written a part for me that he thought would be funny, and I agreed to play along.

When I saw the script, Franken had written a moment when his character comes at me for a ‘kiss’. I suspected what he was after, but I figured I could turn my head at the last minute, or put my hand over his mouth, to get more laughs from the crowd.

On the day of the show Franken and I were alone backstage going over our lines one last time. He said to me, “We need to rehearse the kiss.” I laughed and ignored him. Then he said it again. I said something like, ‘Relax Al, this isn’t SNL…we don’t need to rehearse the kiss.’

He continued to insist, and I was beginning to get uncomfortable.

He repeated that actors really need to rehearse everything and that we must practice the kiss. I said ‘OK’ so he would stop badgering me. We did the line leading up to the kiss and then he came at me, put his hand on the back of my head, mashed his lips against mine and aggressively stuck his tongue in my mouth.

I immediately pushed him away with both of my hands against his chest and told him if he ever did that to me again I wouldn’t be so nice about it the next time.

I walked away. All I could think about was getting to a bathroom as fast as possible to rinse the taste of him out of my mouth.

I felt disgusted and violated.

Al Franken claimed he was just being funny. “Is that funny if she does that to your sister or to your daughter or to your wife,” Leeann Tweeden asked?

And you’re going to rabidly turn on him, Democrats, or you’re going to once again show that you are just as hypocrite and wrong and evil today as you were when you were backing your Rapist-in-Chief.

Al Franken needs to be forced to immediately resign from the U.S. Senate. Period. End of story. Or get off your high horses about Roy Moore.

If it turns out that Roy Moore committed these acts that he’s being accused of from four decades ago, then he violated everything that he professed to believe about Jesus and about the Christianity he claims. And so I can definitively state that if Roy Moore treated women the way he is being accused of having done, he is a lousy Christian and a hypocrite who pretends to be something he isn’t.

But when a Barack Obama assures the American people that he is AGAINST gay marriage because he believes “as a Christian” that marriage is between one man and one woman, and then reverses himself, was Barack Obama the LORD God Almighty and Creator of the heavens and the earth who changed his mind??? All liberalism is – and you can add the pseudo-descriptor of “Christian” to liberalism – is constantly evolving moral hypocrisy.

Whenever you claim any connection whatsoever to Christianity or to Jesus Christ, you are liars, pure rank liars. You have no standards or integrity, and any moral standards you claim are parasitic upon a faith that you have done everything to destroy with casual divorce laws, with homosexuality, with the abortion holocaust, with Government-as-God-and-Savior. You stand for nothing. Your feet are firmly planted in midair. And even when you DO come to some moral realization, such as the fact that you all voted for a rapist, it is only a political pretense to help your cynical and craven political cause now.

Ok, so here we go again. Another shooting, another liberal attempt to “fundamentally transform” society into a Stalinist or Nazi-style socialist utopia that bans guns from law-abiding people. Because yes, it is a simple fact of history that every single totalitarian regime became a totalitarian regime by first stripping its people of the weapons they would need to prevent a totalitarian regime from stomping on their faces Orwell-1984-style: “If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.”

But as Adolf Hitler said, “To conquer a nation, first disarm it’s citizens.”

And THEN you get to stamp on their face, forever.

Totalitarian tyranny is the cherished dream of every true liberal. Refusing to believe in God, they refuse to believe in the human soul. Refusing to believe in the human soul, they have no basis whatsoever for human free will, or dignity, or freedom, or liberty. The game of “rights” is merely that, because the way they argue it, they get to take away the rights of their opponents whenever they want (the right to keep and bear arms, the right to free speech, the right to religious liberty) and give rights that never before existed to their godless base. And the fecal matter that is liberal philosophy rolls down the slope from there.

Let’s go back over the past couple of months here, starting with the atheist hater Stephen Paddock who gunned down pro-conservative and pro-Christian country music lovers after the crowd sang “God Bless America.” It wasn’t a fundamentalist Christian Southern Baptist gunning down people at a gay rights parade, understand???

Then we had the Harvey Weinstein revelations. Huge leftist turd protected by other leftists such as uberliberal Matt Damon and leftist entities such as the leftist fake news paper The New York Times and the Democratic donating lawyer industry and a “feminist” lawyer named Lisa Bloom doing everything possible to protect him while he raped and then raped again. In this scandal, you see the REAL haters of women, with every major liberal organization colluding to shelter a decades-long serial rapist. And what do liberals want to have as a result of what THEY are and what THEY did? Even more power. Trust us. We’ll fix the giant moral crisis that we caused. Just give us your souls. And remove your skirt, please. It’s in the path of progressivism, I mean progress.

Now, on the same damn day, two really ugly things happened. We’ve got another atheist murderer gunning down 26 Christians in a church. I heard a news conference claiming “no religious motivation in the shooting.” And then I saw this:

That’s right, boys and girls: the rabid mass murderer who gunned down as many helpless Christians as he could was an ATHEIST. He was known for being so rabid in his atheistic views that even people who weren’t that religious just avoided him. You had to demonically HATE God to be okay with this turd.

Atheism is the ugliest and most vicious and most totalitarian worldview that has ever existed or ever WILL exist. Atheism is the political philosophy responsible for more than 100 million murders of their own people just in peacetime alone. There is no worldview – including that of ISIS – that can compare to the destruction of the human spirit committed by communism. But every single communist regime was officially state atheist, and so you have to start counting the many “wars of revolution” that have violently plagued the last century and continues to plague us in this one today that have resulted in the violent deaths of millions more human beings.

Liberals and atheists have this bizarre tendency – the thesis of this article – to studiously ignore the ugliness in their own eyes. They conveniently forget their own history of the Democratic Party being the party of the genocidal Trail of Tears, the party of slavery and of the Civil War where REPUBLICANS had to fight to free a people institutionally enslaved by DEMOCRATS, of the Democratic Party terrorist arm otherwise known as the Klu Klux Klan that Democrats created in the aftermath of that Civil War. The blacks after the Civil War were ALL REPUBLICANS for a damn REASON. Liberals conveniently forget the profound relationship and connection between the KKK and the Democratic Party, the fact that the first “liberal progressive,” Woodrow Wilson, praised the KKK film “Birth of a Nation,” the way that the 1924 national Democratic Convention was so dominated by the Klan it was called “Klanbake,” and so on ad nauseam: Bull Connor to Robert Byrd. The “transformation” of the Democratic Party from rabidly-anti-black to rabidly-anti-white came from this fount with Lyndon Baines Johnson expressing it succinctly: “These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference… I’ll have them niggers voting Democratic for the next two hundred years”. And that is exactly what the Democratic Party did, “fundamentally transforming” the plantation into a place where the uppity negro would want to live by providing a meager, subsistence living (paid for by others, of course) in exchange for the black soul, which is now owned by the devil himself. And that is why blacks will NEVER be a successful people in America until they shrug off the shackles of the NEW Democratic Party plantation. This is the same LBJ who displayed what he REALLY thought of “Civil Rights” by appointing Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court while saying, “”Son, when I appoint a n—–r to the court, I want everyone to know he’s a n—–r.”

Don’t think that Democrats don’t think blacks are filthy niggers who will always BE filthy niggers, but they’ve got another craven way to cynically exploit them.

Just like Stephen Paddock, the Las Vegas gunman who used an Obama bump stock to improve his rate of fire.

They’re making it about the mother-in-law who went to the church. Well, he didn’t go to her house; HE WENT TO HER CHURCH. And he didn’t gun down the mother-in-law; he gunned down every single Christian he could murder. Because he’s an atheist and a rabid hater of God and of God’s people.

Let me provide a personal digression: if I kicked a neighbors dog after it bit me, the mainstream media headline would read, “Fundamentalist Christian Hate.” And let’s just state it as a fact that if I were to go gun down Muslims in a mosque – which by the way I would NEVER do and hope I would actually die defending Muslims from such an attack – we can safely know that my status as a publicly confessing Christian would become the instant focus of my motivation for the attack.

We’ve been seeing this rabidly hypocritical game played for decades now: the left cries “separation of church and state” and keeps Christians out (while inviting Muslims AS MUSLIMS in by as many million as they can). The “separation of church and state” philosophy exists NOWHERE in our Constitution, our Bill or Rights, or our Declaration of Independence (which strangely keeps invoking GOD as being the American people’s reason and right to separate itself from political tyranny in the first place). Rather, it is a phrase that is intentionally taken out of context from a private letter that Thomas Jefferson wrote to a Baptist church. If one read the actual letter in its entirety, one would immediately understand that Jefferson was actually claiming the VERY OPPOSITE of what liberals claim the statement means: that the wall of separation works one and ONLY one way, namely, preventing the government from taking any stand whatsoever against religion while allowing religion to influence government. But we find that to be a liberal progressive is to be a liar. And liars are hypocrites. As we shall see and then keep on seeing.

So atheists have been attacking Christians for decades using their ideological allies in the courts who simply invent the law in their own image and say “I’m a judge, so whatever I want must be ‘the law,'” and we get decision after decision against us based on the fake news notion of “separation of church and state.” Which nakedly exploits the power of the state in the hands of religious ideologue atheists into a weapon against the Church. Which the very words they cite is evil according to the actual context of the man who wrote those words.

So what we have is a group of dishonest religious atheists – and there is NO reason to be honest in atheism, for the simple reason that by what morality or absence of morality would one be called a bad atheist? – have cynically exploited a rabidly-out-of-context statement to purge religion, in order to impose their OWN damn religion of atheism.

Dishonest hypocrisy is THE hallmark of liberal progressivism. It is impossible to be a liberal progressive and be an honest human being. The two are mutually exclusive of one another.

Mind you, same day that an atheist was shooting up a Christian church, we had a liberal Democrat Trump-hating neighbor viciously attack Republican Senator Rand Paul for the death-penalty crime of mowing his lawn while Republican:

Senator Rand Paul was tackled to the ground by a neighbor while he was mowing his lawn in Bowling Green, KY on Friday, causing minor injuries according to a police report. The neighbor, Rene Boucher, and Paul were embroiled in some kind of feud, according to another neighbor.

And it is impossible not to remember how Steve Scalise was gunned down along with three others by an automatic-rifle raving Democrat out to murder every single Republican on the congressional baseball team. Remember that? The mainstream media sure has!

A man asked whether Republicans or Democrats were on the field moments before the shooting at a congressional baseball practice outside Washington Wednesday morning, according to a congressman on the scene.

Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., told Fox News that he left the practice minutes before the shooting. But before he did, he had a “very, very strange” encounter in the parking lot.

“As I was getting into the car [with a colleague], there was a guy that walked up to us that was asking whether it was Republicans or Democrats out there. It was just a little odd,” he said.

House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., 2 U.S. Capitol Police officers, one staffer, and the gunman were shot, according to a Capitol Security source.

Scalise has a security detail. Police say the suspect is in custody.

DeSantis said the man he encountered before the shooting was not carrying anything at the time. But he said it was “weird” that he only asked that question and walked away.

And of course, right after Rep. Scalise was gunned down, Democrats showed us what their love looks like:

The Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund research that resulted in a now-famous dossier containing allegations about President Trump’s connections to Russia and possible coordination between his campaign and the Kremlin, people familiar with the matter said.

Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.

After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community, according to those people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

How the HELL did that happen, where a fake news source that came from RUSSIA was BOUGHT AND PAID FOR by the Clinton campaign and the DNC, was used as the source to open a criminal investigation into the Trump campaign – FOR SOMETHING THAT THE DEMOCRATS HAD ACTUALLY DONE by the very act of getting this report in the first place!!!

We remember Attorney General Loretta Lynch secret meeting with Bill Clinton and every morally sentient being understands that they were conspiring.

While the “Feds” were beginning a fake news criminal investigation of the Trump campaign in conspiracy with Russian intelligence, Hillary and Bill were betraying the United States of America in order to get hundreds of millions of dollars kick backed to their bogus Clinton Foundation which was never anything more than a Ponzi-scheme-style influence-peddling favor scheme. And the fact that it has largely ceased to exist because Bill and Hillary no longer have any influence to peddle proves that.

The Obama administration knew that Russia had used bribery, kickbacks and extortion to get a stake in the US atomic energy industry — but cut deals giving Moscow control of a large chunk of the US uranium supply anyway, according to a report Tuesday.

The FBI used a confidential US witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather records, make secret recordings and intercept ­emails as early as 2009 that showed the Kremlin had compromised an American uranium trucking company, The Hill reported.

Executives at the company, Transport Logistics International, kicked back about $2 million to the Russians in exchange for lucrative no-bid contracts — a scheme that violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the report said.

The feds also learned that Russian nuclear officials had gotten millions of dollars into the US designed to benefit the Clinton Foundation at the same time then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government committee that signed off on the deals, sources told The Hill.

The racketeering operation was conducted “with the consent of higher-level officials” in Russia who “shared the proceeds” from the kickbacks, an agent later stated in an affidavit.

But the Justice Department under Attorney General Eric Holder did not bring charges in the case prior to the deals being cut.