Tuesday, March 27, 2012

I did not expect the response I got from my initial and then follow up post about the TV program, The Big Bang Theory. Both those posts are still getting regular hits and unusual amount of comments (for this blog, anything more than 10-15 comments is unusual).

I was surprised to find out how many manosphere regulars were very familiar/regular viewers of The Big Bang Theory. As I wrote earlier, there are so many aspects I could have covered regarding all the themes and subtexts conveyed subversively in the show -- like Commenter Carpe Oro points out, "I watch it with my wife and personally get a chuckle out of how PC it is regarding science and the typical "well ALL smart people know this is the TRUTH about how the world works" jive they sell."

The main point is that TBBT is simply one example of the entire purpose of TellAVision Programming as a social engineering tool.

As commenter Ubermind wrote: "There is no need to see more evil in BBT than in every common TV soap opera that has been around for ages."

Right. It's almost ALL evil. Nearly on every channel, on almost every show, you can find aspects of behavior, attitudes and ideas that promote human relationship dysfunction in some way or another.

Ubermind also commented:

"I would be cautious to call it a conspiracy (because it is bad to see conspiracy in everything even trough there is a conspiracy) it is just how the TV series need to operate to continue earning money."

I'll throw caution to the wind and just say it outright - TellAVision Programming is certainly one, big, giant conspiracy.

It is one of the most effective means of propagandizing We the Sheeple ever devised.

When you become a regular viewer of a program, you begin to subconsciously feel like you're personally involved with the characters on screen. The tone of their voice, their facial expressions....the regular exposure of constant viewing tricks your mind into thinking you actually KNOW the people on screen. Regular viewing simulates the familiarity that comes with interpersonal friendship with people in real life. This is how it "grows" on you...and how it influences you on a subconscious level.

I grew to "like" the characters on The Big Bang Theory. I looked forward to watching new episodes in the same way I look forward to attending an upcoming party in which I'll see all of my friends and acquaintances. This influence is precisely how social engineering to change attitudes and behavior is effected in our society.

As a Gen X-er, I can remember a time when curse words, nudity and gratuitous violence were verboten on network TV. Crudity, cruelty and familial dysfunction were not a regular feature of the old shows of the 80's. There were an abundance of positive, masculine characters, and women were not portrayed as super-empowered, ass-kicking, know-it-alls. All of these changes were gradually phased into TellAVision Programming over the course of decades.

I remember when it was SHOCKING that a TV sitcom had a single, mild curse word like BITCH was used, or a brief flash of nudity was shown...all my friends and I were talking about it in the schoolyard the next day like it was a major event that had occurred. And it was. Every initial instance added to the continual, gradual and incremental decline in standards and morality of society at large amongst we the sheeple.

What is the "grand conspiracy" here?

One need not concern themselves with trying to connect TellAVision Programming with NWO Agenda, Global Governance, the Illuminati, Reptilian Aliens, UFO's or the Federal Reserve to understand why I call it a "conspiracy."

Simple corporate-driven profit motive will do.

Our reality is that we do not live in a Capitalist, nor Socialist society...but a Corporatist one. Everything in the "First" world is shaped, manipulated and controlled by Corporations. Nameless, faceless, inhuman entities that treat us all nothing more than CONSUMERS and HUMAN RESOURCES who's sole purpose is to generate revenue streams to profit shareholders.

If there's one thing corporate marketing researchers know about human motivation, is that people who are unhappy and have no real meaningful direction in their lives are desperate to try and find that meaning...they are much more easily influenced into trying to "BUY" happiness by consuming products and services.

This, of course, never really works. Consuming products and services may give temporary happiness, but it will always dissipate and cause a person to try and buy even more happiness. Following the path of consumerism will consume you...which is exactly what THEY want us all to do.

This is why relationship dysfunction is an INTEGRAL part of TellAVision script writing. Emasculate men, pedestalize and masculinize women. Feature humorous dialog based on cruelty and put downs. Friends and lovers regularly insult each other...relationships never last, break ups, divorces...all of it is normalized by TellAVision Programming, to subversively influence the viewer to internalize such attitudes and behavior, and translate it into disconnected dysfunction in our personal lives.

The unhappiness modeled on screen turns into the unhappiness in your head which than transforms into the unhappiness manifest in your relationships with your family, friends and colleagues at work.

Unhappiness and fear are the most profitable mindsets for corporate marketing departments to capitalize on in trying to sell you something...sell you anything and everything.

It's overriding message is that we are all unhappy, life is shit, all people are crude, selfish and narcissistic animals....but you can be happy if you BUY something.

As I write this, the lyrics to one of my favorite Tool songs, Hooker With A Penis, echo in my mind:

All you read and wear or see and hear on TV is a product, begging for your fatass,dirty
Dollar...

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Have you ever read George Orwell's 1984? It is not a science fiction novel, it's a fucking blueprint.

Every citizen, or at least every citizen important enough to be worth watching, could be kept twenty-four hours a day under the eyes of the police and in the sound of official propaganda, with all other channels of communication closed. The possibility of enforcing not only complete obedience to the will of the State, but complete uniformity of opinion of all subjects now existed.

No, surely that cannot happen here, in the LAND OF THE FREE AND THE HOME OF THE BRAVE?!?!?!

The United Kingdom – United States of America Agreement (UKUSA) is a multilateral agreement for cooperation in signals intelligence among the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. It was first signed in March 1946 by the United Kingdom and the United States and later extended to encompass the three former British dominions. The UKUSA Agreement was a follow-up of the 1943 BRUSA Agreement, the World War II agreement on cooperation over intelligence matters.[3] This was a secret treaty, allegedly so secret that it was kept secret from the Australian Prime Ministers until 1973.[4]
The agreement established an alliance of five English-speaking countries for the purpose of sharing intelligence, especially signals intelligence. It formalized the intelligence sharing agreement in the Atlantic Charter, signed in 1941, before the entry of the U.S. into the conflict.[5]

With the advent of the internet and the exponential increase of global communications, our Brave New World Order Overlords need new facilities to handle the sheer volume of encrypted data!

The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.” It is, in some measure, the realization of the “total information awareness” program created during the first term of the Bush administration—an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans’ privacy.

But “this is more than just a data center,” says one senior intelligence official who until recently was involved with the program. The mammoth Bluffdale center will have another important and far more secret role that until now has gone unrevealed. It is also critical, he says, for breaking codes. And code-breaking is crucial, because much of the data that the center will handle—financial information, stock transactions, business deals, foreign military and diplomatic secrets, legal documents, confidential personal communications—will be heavily encrypted. According to another top official also involved with the program, the NSA made an enormous breakthrough several years ago in its ability to cryptanalyze, or break, unfathomably complex encryption systems employed by not only governments around the world but also many average computer users in the US. The upshot, according to this official: “Everybody’s a target; everybody with communication is a target.”

As envisioned, the seven-building CSEC complex will be the equivalent of a 90-storey skyscraper turned on its side – a highly secure compound outfitted with the latest high-tech gear. Two nearby electrical generating stations will power the agency’s computers, which suck in millions of conversations from around the world each day and scour them for intelligence information.

Soon...very soon, total surveillance of all electronic communications in every corner of the globe will be monitored, recorded, de-crypted, analyzed and available for the emerging New World Order's Global Government to identify and act upon as they see fit.

To the future or to the past, to a time when thought is free,
when men are different from one another and do not live alone
- to a time when truth exists and what is done cannot be undone:
From the age of uniformity, from the age of solitude,
from the age of BIG BROTHER, from the age of doublethink
- greetings!

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

There were a number of good comments on my last post regarding the Big Bang Theory. While I was writing it, there were a whole lot of other themes and subtexts I could have also pointed out with regards to the show (extended adolescence, over the top caricatures of Christians and Christianity, ), but I found the post starting getting disjointed in trying to cover everything...so I deleted whole sections before hitting the publish button.

In the comments, Alte posted a link to a feminist blog entitled Womanist Musings, in which she points out that feminists don't like the show because it had an episodes that had slut shaming combined with racism. (Look it up in the comments of the last post if you really wanna see the piece, I'm not going to hotlink to that misandrist blog) Commenter Sojourner also weighed in:
"...this show does have a perchance for slut shaming."

I actually disagree...I believe TBBT is actually engaging in a bit of "wag the dog" style propagandizing.

First thing to note is that the episode for which the feminist blogger is offended with has Penny expressing regret for sleeping with Raj and how she feels guilty for it. Womanist is offended, but she fails to realize the entire context of that episode is actually promoting her feminist ideology: Penny "puts everything back to the way it was" - i.e. no real consequences for her slutty behavior, and by the next episode, Raj, Penny and Leonard all act as if nothing had ever happened.
Is that REAL "slut shaming?" Note the dialog between Penny and the other female character, Amy, that got Womanist all upset:

Amy: Do you know the story of Catherine the Great?
Penny: No
Amy: She ruled Russia in the 1700's and one night when she was feeling particularly randy she used an intricate system of pulleys to have intimate relations with a horse.
Penny: I'm sorry, what does this have to do with me?
Amy: She engaged in inter-species hanky panky and people still call her great. I'm sure your reputation can survive you shagging a little Indian boy.

Cue laugh track.

Slut shaming? Looks more to me like demonstrating how the female rationalization hamster can explain away slutty behavior. Yet another subversive meme being presented as normalized behavior in the show.

Womanist is all upset that the script writers have Penny expressing feelings of guilt for sleeping with Raj - who is supposed to be Leonard's friend. Sleeping with your boyfriend's friends is slutty behavior. Womanist is upset that the script writers here are calling a spade, a spade.

Real slut shaming by a TV show script writer would involve showing the real consequences of slutty, promiscuous behavior. Usually when a girl sleeps with her boyfriend's friends in real life, the relationship dynamics between the sordid triangle are forever changed. Raj and Leonard would never be friends again, may even fight, and there would no longer be the regular episodes of the entire cast sitting in the living room eating take-out food and hanging out.

But not here...the show carries on, episode after episode, with no real effects from slutty, promiscuous behavior ever depicted realistically.
Womanist fails to identify the real theme of that particular episode: Brave New World Order sexual morality = sex is disconnected from procreation, and is now a meaningless entertainment. Everyone can fuck anyone and no one is supposed to be upset, nor should they let meaningless, promiscuous sex interfere with relationships. She's upset that the script writers would DARE even put in even a half-assed dialog that hints at slut shaming, but fails to see the bigger picture in that the slut shaming referenced is ineffective, LAUGHED OFF, and marginalized by Amy's rationalization - Catherine was a horse fucker, yet she was still considered GREAT!

In other words, the real subtext of the message here is: DON'T LET SLUT SHAMING BOTHER YOU LADIES...others have done far worse and they are still considered historically GREAT!

Feminists like Womanist wants no mention of any kind of judgement for any female's sexual behavior whatsoever. No one EVER should have even the slightest thought for judging any woman, anywhere for her sexual choices. She fails to realize how the very episode she derides, is actually playing a part in promoting the marginalization of slut shaming as a means of constraining female sexuality.

Saturday, March 17, 2012

My wife discovered her new favorite sitcom a couple of months ago, The Big Bang Theory. All of the re-runs are aired on TBS in blocks of 4 shows at a time, several nights a week, so she programmed the DVR to record all episodes. Over the course of a couple of months, we've eventually watched every episode that has aired...well she has.

I've basically heard most of the episodes while I'm online and she's watching the tube.

Just listening to the show in the other room while I'm surfing teh interwebz, I found myself chuckling at some of the more clever dialogs, insults and endless nerdy-dungeons&dragons/Star Trek/Star Wars/Comic Book references. After hearing several episodes, my curiosity got the better of me I began to actually watch the show with her.

No doubt, the show is amusing.

But there is so many subtexts, themes and motifs that are subversive, social engineering.

For the "red pill" viewer, I found that I don't even have to think about it anymore, I instantaneously identify the subtexts, themes, and subversive dialogs designed to subtly influence the viewer as I watch it. Once you recognize the processes used to subconsciously influence the viewer's mind, it loses it's power to influence you.

Now, the idea for this post has been stewing in my mind for quite awhile now...after having viewed a few episodes, I already knew I'd eventually get to a point where a blog post would almost write itself....and today is that day. So the first thing I did was search for an image of the show's cast to use, which brought me to this blog post by some guy I've never heard of before, Jamey Stegmaier: Why I stopped Watching the Big Bang Theory, and Why You Should Too.

He makes some good points...on one level, he recognizes a few of the negative PROGRAMMING aspects of the show - behaviors and dialogs that contribute to the continually declining state of our society -the wanton cruelty, narcissism, solipsism and general nastiness the characters abuse each other with for the viewers humor.

Stegmaier's main point focuses on the show's protagonist, Sheldon Cooper:

The problem is that Sheldon’s quirks–all of which are disruptive and
unkind–are written for laughs. The writers are saying, “It’s okay to be
rude and inconsiderate, because really it’s funny! Really!” If you watch
Sheldon too much, you will find yourself (either outloud or in your
inner monologue) correcting people for the most inane things. A friend
will say, “Now that everyone’s here, let’s get started,” and you will
mumble in response, “Well, technically, everyone’s not here,
because ‘everyone’ infers that all humans are here, and not only are not
all humans here, but if they were here, they couldn’t fit into this
pitiful excuse for a living room.”

Cue laughtrack.

That’s my
main point. Sheldon is a terrible example for a person, a friend, and
an inner monologue. He makes the show, but he also makes it a terrible
show.

I agree with Stegmaier that the character of Sheldon makes the show (in most scenes, Sheldon demonstrates the concept of maintaining a very strong frame), but his verbal cruelty is hardly the worst thing...after all, every character in the show engage in personal nastiness and cruelty in nearly every scene. That's par for the course in all network TV sitcoms since Married With Children became a smash hit in the 90's. From Seinfeld, to Friends, to It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the sitcom genre of cruel humor at character's expense has become a staple of the genre for close to 20 years now.

Of course, while I agree with Stegmaier that immersing yourself into a Tell-A-Vision PROGRAM that normalizes interpersonal degradation and cruelty is corrosive to your personal attitude and can influence your real life relationships, the entertainment value cannot be denied...in the same way watching people die on TV can certainly be riveting entertainment.

Many of the putdowns, insults and double entendres in the shows script are clever and funny, which is of course what makes it so subversive and corrosive...and contributes to the coarsening of the culture at large. But Stegmaier is clueless to the deeper subversion found in the PROGRAM....Brave New World Order gender and sexual morality programming.

And it can be summed up perfectly by the second picture and caption that Stegmaier posted regarding the character of Penny, the Female Protagonist of the show:

"Okay, so there is ONE reason to watch The Big Bang Theory."

Indeed, this is precisely the PROGRAMMING to which I am referring to. Despite all the negativity that Stegmaier recognizes in the show that has gotten him to "quit" watching it, the visual physical beauty of the female is a virtue that trumps all other considerations. Of course, Stegmaier is being facetious here...but he unwittingly points out precisely what is so subversive about this show.

Observing Penny's role and how all the other male characters interact with her is the real programming process being imprinted into the subconsciousness of the viewer. The examples on the show are legion. You can go to the show's website, and pick out any episode at random, and if you know what to look for, you'll see it.

Penny is the Queen Bee of the show. She effortlessly manipulates all of the male characters in the show's cast. All of the male characters unquestioningly are willing to do anything for her at the drop of a hat. Only Sheldon is partly immune to this - but that's more because of Sheldon's narcissism and OCD take precedence over his sex drive. Penny cannot manipulate him with her sexual attractiveness, she usually has to resort to bribery or extortion to manipulate Sheldon - but she still usually finds a way to get what she wants.

But above all else, the core substance of her character is this: she is entitled, because she is hot.

There are multiple episodes in which she castigates all of the males in the room with some variation of "YOU GUYS SHOULD ALL BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES!" Her shaming always works to inspire repentance and grovelling for forgiveness. She is in fact the unquestioned moral arbiter of the show...yet her only truly redeeming virtue in the show is really nothing more than her function as eye candy. Her character is largely shallow, solipsistic and self-serving. She does many things in the show for which she herself should be ashamed of...but there are no guys on the show capable of exhibiting a spine and taking a stand and calling her on her behavior. She's on the Pedestal, and all males grovel for her approval.

The guys will do anything for her, because she is hot, even if the male characters know they have no chance to gain her sexual favor. She LJBF's all the male characters of the show except for the character of Leonard...and all of the guys still white knight and beta-orbit her in nearly every scene.

With Leonard, she alternates between LJBF-ing him and having a friends-with-benefits type of sexual relationship. The on-again-off again "romance" is the most sickening and disgusting aspect of the show.

Penny leads, Leonard follows.

The character of Leonard is passive aggressive, simpering, sackless and has a severe case of oneitis for her. He is only spurred to act bravely or assertively if Penny shames him into it or promises a sexual reward. He has no say in the status or direction of their relationship, it's completely at Penny's whim, and he just has to accept her choice and go with however she "feels" in any part of the show. When they are "together," he begs and pleads for sex. When they are apart, he feigns disinterest and approval for Penny's other boyfriends in her presence, than mopes, seethes and plots to disrupt her new relationship when she's not around.

In short, for the viewer who understands "the red pill" and how female hypergamy works, the relationship between Leonard and Penny is completely unrealistic and artificial. Leonard has almost zero alpha traits, he is the paradigm of the NICE GUY white knight. In fact, during many of the episodes in which they are "just friends" Penny often "dates" other guys- athletic, dumb jock alpha types...which of course is the only realistic representation of today's sexual marketplace.

No matter how many other guys Penny sleeps with, Leonard is always ready and willing to take her back, and not judge her negatively for her steadily increasing partner count in anyway. When she is dating other men, he still is ready and willing to do anything for her at anytime.

In short, this show, with it's witty dialog, humorous banter, and clever SyFy pop-culture references, is a very well-crafted series of BNWO socially engineered programming.

It models precisely the sort of behaviors and attitudes that 'beta-ize" males and "empower" females with an entitlement mentality. It models to women how to use flirtations, their physical beauty, and verbal shaming to easily manipulate men rendered hapless by their male sex drive...while modelling to men the attitude that they have no control, and the only correct behavior is to do whatever SHE wants him to do.

My little excursion back into becoming a "regular" viewer of TellAVision Programming reminded me of one of the favorite sayings of Tom Leykis (the "Roissy" of talk radio in the late 90's/early 00's): "TV is one big, giant vagina."

There's a reason why Game has become one of the most discussed topics in the manosphere, and it has nothing to do with the claims of some anti-gamers who conflate PUA hucksters and their overpriced workshops and materials with Game the Theory.

The anti-Gamers fail to understand (some of them don't even try) the kind of Programming most of us Gen X and millennial males have grown up with. The Big Bang Theory is but one instance of the literally thousands of sources of similar programming we have been subjected to our entire lives. Many men grew up in homes without Fathers, and their only male role models to shape their attitudes and beliefs and how to interact with women are the emascualted, female-subservient role models on the TellAVision.

Monkey see, monkey do.

Most times, after getting scorned, LJBF'd, rejected, cheated on, divorced, stripped of their property and children...only then do men even begin to question their own attitudes, behavior and actions with regards to their relationships with the female gender. Then some of them find the red pill on teh interwebz, and for the first time in their lives, "GAME" gives them a framework for understanding how the subversive influences of our Matriarchal culture have shaped their behaviors and affected their life trajectories.

This is the real value of Game Theory (not the PUA lifestyle) to the discussions throughout the Manosphere.

It is counter-programming...reverse social engineering for both men and women alike.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

I recently cleaned up a buddy's computer that was overloaded with spyware, adware, trojans, worms, extraneous anti-virus software, and all the other little .exe files from all the programs installed that were useless eaters of RAM, making his CPU operate at a sloth's pace. His PC stopped working and kept displaying the "Virtual Memory is Too Low" warning. When he called me for help, I sighed and told him to bring it over and leave it with me, I'll get to it later, it could take awhile.

It's a chore I hate so much that I perpetually procrastinate on it when it comes to my own collection of
PC's. It seems like I'm always troubleshooting and repairing PCs for family
and friends --which probably plays a role in my reluctance to do it for myself -- but I digress.

After cleaning off all the accumulated crap and then de-fragging, optimizing an rebooting numerous times, I was finally done. I hate PC maintenance with a passion. Too much time wasted staring at the progress bar of the uninstall program, than rebooting, than scanning the registry and cleaning up the residual files left behind. One uninstall down, 10 more to go.

What a drag. When the computer is as bogged down and infested as bad as my buddies', there is no shortcuts other than to dump it and buy a new one.

But doing him this favor also gives a lot of time for rumination. This latest round of PC maintenance-chore boredom gave me the time to reflect on the prevailing paradigm of the manosphere: TAKE THE RED PILL

There's a reason the Matrix red pill/blue pill allegory has become so popular here at the fringe outposts on the interwebz...
...because once you "take the red pill," you really do start to recognize patterns in the attitudes and behaviors that manifest in the denizens of society you interact with or observe from close proximity.

Programming recognition.

The program is a social engineering module that can be recognized on your registry if you know how to look for it. It usually shows up as:

BraveNewWorldOrder.exe or BNWO.EXE

It's actually not just one, single unified program that is installed on your operating system to control your behavior, it's a smorgasbord of smaller programs like all the spyware and adware that surreptitiously infects your PC over a long period of internet usage, slowly and gradually acquiring more and more .exe files that eat up most of your virtual memory, so that you are not consciously aware of how distracted you are from reality or how it's really screwed your operating system's function up.

Taking the red pill's first effects is similar to hitting CNTRL-ALT-DELETE and looking at your Windows Task Manager Processes tab to recognize which processes are necessary, which ones are not vital, but you don't mind using some of your RAM on, and which of those slow you down and contribute to your eventual complete shutdown. So you download Crap Cleaner and Spybot
and commence cleaning up your registry. It can take years, but it is possible.

Way too many processes eating up my virtual memory and slowing me down. The BNWO.EXE appeared to use the most memory, but you can't just stop that process and delete it from your registry. You have to delete a whole host of other processes and registry entries first, before you can successfully purge your system of this most insidious program.

It's taken a long time, but I think I've finally purged it. I'm now at the point where I'm optimized for smoother, faster, more efficient operations from here on out.

Looking at my Windows Task Manger Processes Tab now should looks more like this:

There are still a few processes I could still delete to streamline and optimize things a bit more...but those ancillary programs also provide unmeasurable utility, so I deem them worth the miniscule amount of processing they take up. In the aggregate, I'm still running far more efficiently and effectively than I used to.

Saturday, March 10, 2012

One of Orwell's most famous quotes could be the tagline for the entire manosphere:

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."

It seems to be the case that the revolution has arrived...the manosphere has gone viral, and the knowledge of our issues has crossed over. The red pill is reaching crack cocaine epidemic status on the 'street' of teh interwebz.

This is precisely what I believe is behind the $LPC's recentlisting of the manosphere for inclusion as a "hate" and "extremist" movement.

For years, the manosphere was fringe. You couldn't find serious discussions about our Brave New World Order and it's oppression of the male gender anywhere else in cyberspace.

Anytime you went to any mainstream news or special interest site or forum, any idea or thought that was posted that ran counter to mainstream, feminist approved, politically correct doublethink, used to be either quickly censored, or inundated with denunciations of misogyny, sexism and/or homophobia by other commenters.

This no longer happens. Articles and blog postings at mainstream sites that adhere to the politically correct, feminist-approved line, are regularly inundated with "red pill" comments. Many comments often contain links to various manosphere sites. More and more people are being exposed to the politically incorrect ideas, and it can no longer be ignored. To reiterate a point I made back in 2009, when the "roissysphere" first emerged:

I don't believe "Activism" -- in the sense of fomenting a grass roots
movement to build a groundswell of support to institute legal and
cultural changes -- is ever going to realistically solve the problems
many MRA/MGTOW bloggers have been writing about for years now. The
feminist zeitgeist is too firmly entrenched into our mainstream
culture...an inoperable cancer.

No, it is my firm contention that
the only real and meaningful way in which the MRA blogosphere CAN
effect real change, is on an individual level:

AWARENESS.

To raise awareness of the truth of the reality that we all live in.

To
enable people to see things clearly, so that when they make goals and
try to direct their lives towards achieving them, they do so knowing the
full score so they can avoid many of the pitfalls our
BraveNewWorldOrder has created to entrap us all in our deliberately
distorted and contorted understanding of the gender roles and how they
affect our lives.

So now comes time for the attacks. Make no mistake, the $LPC is just the first stage.

Soon, the real world action is going to take place. This is the modus operandi of organizations like the $LPC.

First, they identify the most prominent sites in the manosphere...than they attempt to tie it into previous acts of violence. As I commented over at A Voice for Men:

"...the $PLC essentially seeks to use the exact same tactic Bill Clinton
used to try and tarnish the entire right wing talk radio genre with Tim
McVeigh’s bombing of the OKC Fed building.

It is by far the most ominous of the 3 articles posted…this is going to be their primary tactic moving forward.
They
are attempting to tie Thomas Ball’s suicide, and the Sodini, Lepine and
Darren Mack murders as the actions of men “instigated” by MRM bloggers.

Note the final sentence: “But she did not, becoming instead the latest in a long, sad line of victims of women-hating men.”

There you have it.

We
are all now “women-hating men” and being associated with “women-hatred”
we are de facto guilty of instigating murder and domestic violence."

Mark my words...the next time some Father driven to a breaking point by the family court system goes berserk and does something murderous, some group like the $PLC is going to file a lawsuit against The Spearhead or IMF or AVFM and try to hold them liable for "inciting" violence with "hate speech." This is how they will divert the attention away from the realities of the system and it's role in pushing men into acts of violence...by blaming it on those of us who are pointing out the truth.

Coming soon - mention of manosphere websites on television news broadcasts and mainstream media publications, portraying it in a similar light to other "homegrown terrorist" groups like White Nationalists and neo-nazi groups.

The FBI, or DHS will be "concerned" about the role the "internet" is playing in violence against women, and some sort of legislation will be proposed to stop the "hate."

Sunday, March 4, 2012

"There is no
“American Dream”, there is no “Path to Prosperity”, there is only tax
servitude and likely police beatings or death to those that resist." - Bill Powell from The Apocalypse Cometh

"I can go out on Friday and act like Tucker Max for the night, but trying
to keep that up all weekend? No thank you, sir. I’ve got better shit
to do." - Aurini from Stares at the World

"Because being an amateur historian I believe the point we have reached
in time and the present state of Christianity in a warped sense eerily
resembles the era just prior to reformation." - UMSLOPOGAAS

"For a long time I’ve been critical of the feminist argument that the use
of “he” as a generic pronoun for both genders is an example of male
privilege." - The Damned Old Man

"Fuck, woman, life doesn’t have to be so difficult you know." - Grit Artisan

"I feel lethal, manic, on the verge of frenzy. I am foaming at the mouth. My nose is starting to bleed. I think my mask of sanity is about to slip." - G Manifesto

"Then they started wearing yoga pants in a place where I’m
suiting up and I vomited on my penis and screamed to myself who does
that." - VK's Empire of Dirt

"The path to oblivion lurks behind every step we take and each moment of any day." - Brett Stevens fromAmerika.org

"...the fact that my profile (which indicates I’m a
professional masturbator, who does drugs, seeks casual sex and lives
with his parents) gets more attention than a relationship-seeking,
professional who is being nice to girls, makes you wonder what fucked up mechanism is responsible for this." - Sofiafrom Sofiastry

"We understand concerns about teacher-student sex. But didn’t he do everything right here?" - Human-Stupidity

"The path it took, started in MRA circles and then passed through, in
order, the PUA sphere, the Traditionalist camp, then to women, and
finally to feminists." - Factory from Hunting for Archetypes

"I always wanted to have a good answer to any inquiry. I always wanted to be able to do that what the others could not." - Michael Byc from The Lifestyle

"On second thought, the only way to restore moral sanity to the U.S would
be to hand it a one-way ticket to economic abyss, so it looks like
Barack Obama would be the best candidate after all." - The Alpha Anomaly

"What can we learn from this study? Simple: when your head starts achin', it's time to get naked." - DW from Incendiary Insight

Not all women are created equally and trust is earned over time. Do not squander your finite supply. - Peacemaker from Honest Introspection

"Looking back at my life, Game explains every interaction I've ever had with women." - Jean-Luc LeGame from Game Revelation