All aboard with the empty NASA Space Shuttles!

If the design of the NASA Space Shuttle keeps the black body temperature of −454 °F from the outside orbit then the NASA Space Shuttle is at a
temperature for human life.
The NASA Space Shuttle isn’t at a temperature for human life.
Hence, the design of the NASA Space Shuttle doesn’t keep the black body temperature of −454 °F from the outside orbit.

If the air supply supports the NASA Space Shuttle mission for the time in orbit then the crew is able to breathe with the correct amount of oxygen for
the time in orbit.
The crew is not able to breathe with the correct amount of oxygen for the time in orbit.
Consequently, the air supply doesn’t support the NASA Space Shuttle mission for the time in orbit

If the crew of the NASA mission uses a green screen then they are able to fake the mission.
The crew of the NASA mission uses a green screen.
Therefore, they are able to fake the mission.

If the 0 gravity affects the human body then the crew is at risk for body failure.
The 0 gravity affects the human body.
Therefore, the crew is at risk for body failure.

If the NASA Space Shuttle is with a crew in orbit then they're able to perform the mission with the conditions in orbit.
They're not able to perform the mission with the conditions in orbit.
Thus, the NASA Space Shuttle isn’t with a crew in orbit.

If the NASA Space Shuttle is able to reenter from the orbit of the Earth then the NASA Space Shuttle is able to reenter because of the heat of 1,500
°C.
The NASA Space Shuttle isn’t able to reenter because of the heat of 1,500 °C.
Hence, the NASA Space Shuttle isn’t able to reenter the orbit of the Earth.

If the NASA Space Shuttle is able to reenter from the orbit of Earth then the NASA Space Shuttle is in orbit.
The NASA Space Shuttle isn’t in orbit.
Therefore, the NASA Space Shuttle isn’t able to reenter from the orbit of Earth.

If the force of entry into orbit is strong enough to cause death to a human body then there’s death to a human body in entry from earth to orbit.
The force of entry into orbit is strong enough to cause death to a human body.
Hence, there’s death to a human body in entry from earth to orbit.

If the force of reentry into orbit is strong enough to cause death to a human body then there’s death to a human body in reentry from earth to
orbit.
The force of reentry into orbit is strong enough to cause death to a human body.
Hence, there’s death to a human body in reentry from earth to orbit.

Oh no is right. I tried to follow along in the other thread but found it difficult. I feel as though I'm back in British Literature class in high
school with the sonnet style of writing coupled with riddles disguised as a point I'm supposed to comprehend.

Oh no is right. I tried to follow along in the other thread but found it difficult. I feel as though I'm back in British Literature class in high
school with the sonnet style of writing coupled with riddles disguised as a point I'm supposed to comprehend.

This isn’t a creative writing topic, but an argument. This thread is for an argument in denying the space program. The thread will take time in
identifying the flaws with the NASA program.

You seem to have zero understanding for how anything functions in this world, and therefor you deem it all to be a hoax.

Do you not understand what a pressurized cabin is? Do you not understand that the entire space shuttle is not considered "livable space" by the
astronauts?

Honestly... I always try to be nice. But after the Mars Rover post, and now this.. you make absolutely ZERO sense. I don't know if it is a language
barrier or not. I am assuming English is not your first language.

You need to back up claims if you make them. Saying "space is cold so the shuttle must be fake" is not good enough.

Originally posted by DerekJR321
You seem to have zero understanding for how anything functions in this world, and therefor you deem it all to be a hoax.

Do you not understand what a pressurized cabin is? Do you not understand that the entire space shuttle is not considered "livable space" by the
astronauts?

Honestly... I always try to be nice. But after the Mars Rover post, and now this.. you make absolutely ZERO sense. I don't know if it is a language
barrier or not. I am assuming English is not your first language.

You need to back up claims if you make them. Saying "space is cold so the shuttle must be fake" is not good enough.

Your are miscreant with a reply of misconception!

I know you are ridicules for the attack of grammar.
This grammar problem might be true for you, but isn't true for me!

If the living space is able to maintain the crews life at a temperature of −454 °F then the human body is alive in the NASA Space Shuttle.
The human body isn't alive in the NASA Space Shuttle.
Thus, the living space isn't able to maintain the crews life at a temperature of −454 °F.

My point is I am, and I'm sure many others, are not understanding your argument.

I'm reading your arguments as:

"Space is cold"
"People can't live in space"
"The space shuttle is fake because space is cold and people can't live in space"

I am not understanding your argument. What makes you believe that the space shuttle can't be pressurized and control the temperature. Every single
day aircraft travel above 30,000 feet and their cabins are pressurized. They fly just fine. The air is extremely cold and thin at that altitude. Does
that mean Boeing is faking every single flight that their 747's make?

My point is I am, and I'm sure many others, are not understanding your argument.

I'm reading your arguments as:

"Space is cold"
"People can't live in space"
"The space shuttle is fake because space is cold and people can't live in space"

I am not understanding your argument. What makes you believe that the space shuttle can't be pressurized and control the temperature. Every single
day aircraft travel above 30,000 feet and their cabins are pressurized. They fly just fine. The air is extremely cold and thin at that altitude. Does
that mean Boeing is faking every single flight that their 747's make?

We are not going to talk about the Boeing.

Take a look around the other forms to notice the induction.
With the use of deduction this should be significant compared to other threads.
This thread, is working for those to deny.

just thought id pop in to let you know that to me you sound absolutely bonkers.

what about submarines.... shouldnt those be fake with your pitifull logic?

The name calling is about to cease!

Neither the possibility of this is survivable or able to achieve without this faked.

The entering into orbit might be able to kill a human.

If there's space debris that enters the atmosphere then the space debris may hit the NASA Space Shuttle.
There's space debris that enters the atmosphere
Hence, the space debris may hit the NASA Space Shuttle.

All I know is that I knew right of the bat when reading that this was same poster of the mars rover thing and this wasn't going to go well. Me thinks
someone likes to stir the pot for whatever reasons....

Originally posted by yigsstarhouse
All I know is that I knew right of the bat when reading that this was same poster of the mars rover thing and this wasn't going to go well. Me thinks
someone likes to stir the pot for whatever reasons....

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.