Hardly anyone reads this site now, as Google has 100% insulated it from search engines. Well I should be grateful that it is still up. I want to add here anything going on in the realm of 9/11 truth.

My new book trying to emerge is ‘Who did 9/11?’ – with the wonderful cover designed by Simon & Jo

Phew, well I hope my text lives up to that! In a way it’s just a collection of essays but I’ve tried to update them. Let’s face it there has been nothing much published in the UK since the two books by Ian Henshall – on nice glossy pages that I can’t possibly afford – and those were years ago.

In no particular order:

A majority of US citizens no longer believe the Government’s 9/11 story: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50902.htm

The one important group still going is Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (‘A&E’). Its membership has of late climbed above three thousand. These are professionally qualified people! It deserves our TOTAL support. (Obviously they are committed to the view that thermite brought the Towers down, which some of us tend to find a bit credulity-straining) It has 3,020 architects and 22,185 public as members.

3. A&E wrote an important letter to the Tehran government. Its ‘Plaisto’ building in Tehran came down in January 2017, ostensibly by fire but it was pretty obvious that explosives were used. https://www.ae911truth.org/plasco-building-collapse-in-Tehran . The point is, it had molten metal glowing in the debris a week after! No ordinary fire can do this. Reminder: white-hot glowing metal was seen at Ground Zero for a hundred days after 9/11. Alas the Iranian government just wanted to hush this up, as it doesn’t like the idea that some foreign power could do this in its capital city.

3.

Here is the lawyer (((Geoffrey Berman))) who is working on the case: https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-lawyer/articles/geoffrey-berman-at-the-helm-of-the-u-s-attorneys-office-southern-district-of-n-y/ Seems a decent chap ….

On 10th April 2018, attorneys from the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, together with more than a dozen family members of 9/11 victims, filed a petition with the interim U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, demanding that he present evidence of unprosecuted federal crimes at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, to a special grand jury.

I’ll report on this as it unfolds. Back in April, the Lawyers submitted a 50 page petition. Attorney Mick Harrison, Litigation Director, stated: “The failure of our government to diligently investigate this disturbing evidence has contributed to the erosion of trust in our institutions. The Lawyers’ Committee felt it was our duty as public citizens to submit this evidence to the U.S. Attorney for submission to the Special Grand Jury.”

4. Robert David Steel submitted a collection of short statements (one from me) to the US President.

Of the news from the Lawyers he wrote, to all contributors to the monograph (I’m sure he won’t mind me quoting it here):

We cannot claim credit for this utterly marvelous piece of news from A&E, but I earnestly believe that the volume that we put together, that has been downloaded and read online by hundreds of thousands — and that was of course delivered to the White House and to Donald Trump Jr. among others — could have played a small role. Of course A&E and Judicial Watch and others have been supporting this specific course of action.

BRAVO! I am very proud of the collection we put together, it is unique, and I believe that with time we will come to be seen as a group that helped put our President — who I suspect is very much a part of this decision by the normally arrogant and recalcitrant US Attorney for the Southern District, into play.

God Bless you all and God Bless our country, may we rid it of traitors and enemy agents forevermore.

Here is a statement by the ever-optimistic R.D.Steel on Amazon about this monograph:

On 15 February 2016, speaking to a wildly enthusiastic crowd in Bluffton, South Caroline, he [Trump] promised that he would find out — and inform the American public — “who really knocked down the World Trade Center.”

As all engaged and informed citizens now know, the 9/11 Commission was a controlled cover-up at the same level of atrocity as 9/11 itself, and totally comparable to the Warren Commission controlled cover-up on the assassination of John F. Kennedy by Lyndon Baines Johnson, Allen Dulles, J. Edgard Hoover, and varied private sector participants as well as the government of Israel, which sent two witnesses to Dallas.

This collection of 27 memoranda, most one page but a few two pages and one four pages, provide the President all he needs to know to do three big things when he gives his planned speech on 9/11 on 11 September 2018:

1. Direct the Attorney General, Jefferson Sessions, to direct the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, to act on the petition for a Grand Jury and criminal investigation into 9/11 as delivered on 10 April 2018 from the Lawyer’s Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, a 54-page petition with 57 categories of evidence about 9/11 crimes.

2. Support and call on Congress to pass — prior to the November 2018 elections — the Bobby Mcllvaine World Trade Center Investigation Act, to be completed and reported out to the President and the Public by 4 July 2019.

3. Utilize the information in this collection to inspire the expelling of the fake news media from the White House, the creation of a two-way truth channel engaging all 200 million US voters, the passage of #UNRIG Election Reform Act to give all #WalkAway voters a fair shake in a broader political system that terminates the two-party tyranny; and an end, for once and for all, of Deep State and Zionist control of the Shadow Government including the secret intelligence community that persists in advancing lies inciting assassination, defamation, and impeachment proceedings against the President.

The two most shocking memoranda reveal that the WTC was condemned by 1989 and all parties including the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the Mayor of New York City knew the buildings would have to be brought down at a cost of $2B — this provides the commercial insurance fraud motivation and the foundation for the planning of a political false flag operation years in advance; and that 9/11 was used to launder $240 billion dollars used from 1998 to 2001 for a Gold War against Russia — an economic covert war not authorized by Congress or declared to the public, in which Buzzy Krongard, John Brennan, and William Browder appear to have been the principal actors, under the direction of George H. W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and George Tenet.

One slight problem: If he hadn’t been planning the illegal, un-permitted, homicidal demolitions of WTC-7 and the entire World Trade Center complex that took place on September 11th, 2001, there would have been no point to any such design meeting back in April, 2000 … and no opportunity for beginning construction of a new WTC-7 in 2002.

You do indeed appear to have been banned from the search engine, must be doing something right. I wonder if Google can supply a list of sites they have excluded, might be some interesting stuff in there.

Google filtering what we are allowed to see, talk about, think, know, may soon find that Google itself is a gonner. We can hope, although it’s almost impossible to avoid for now. It has infiltrated our lives like a creeping parasite, purge needed.

Off topic, but Thomas Mair’s house in Birstall is now owned by Kirklees council. Does anyone know the rules regarding property owned by lifers ?
Tom’s brother Scott appears to have had his criminal record wiped. He reported a burglary at his council property on xmas day 2012. When the plod arrived they found 20 cannabis plants growing in the back bedroom. He was due to be sentenced at Leeds Crown court on 22/3/13, but no record exists. I await a response from the court.

Swiftly sped the ghostly car,
Through oblongs of red, seen from afar
Shoes were shed. An over-sized blur
Descended like lead. The waters did stir.
Four folk are dead. Over fifty mowed down…
Or so they have said. There seems too few around
In the footage and images released by the press,
Which show little sign of such dreadful distress.
The occasional injured assisted by friends,
One or two ambulance crew then attends;
The absence of traffic should surely astound,
And passing pedestrians rarely look round.

With blood-spattered brow, an MP is shown,
Pumping the chest of a cop whom he’d known,
Who’d tried to arrest a driver who’d crashed
And, a knife in both hands, towards him had dashed.
“Allahu Akbar!” he’d screamed in delight
Seeing gates swing ajar, and but one man to fight.
The gates were unlocked, the cop was unarmed,
The way only blocked by that cop whom he harmed.
This policeman couldn’t have been that well-trained –
Why couldn’t a knife-wielding man be restrained?
Perhaps by bad luck his taser was broken,
And his truncheon got stuck when, from sleep, he was woken
By a car crash that took place just metres from there.
Or maybe the driver flung blades though the air.

Why had he no gun, when not far away
A colleague had one, and made that man pay
For his bloody joyride, and murderous affray,
And attempted prime-ministricide on Ms May?
It was probably bad luck that an MP was near
And tried to resuscitate the policeman so dear,
For blood would be spilling with every down-press
Killing him with good intentions no less.
But the paramedics who arrived at the scene
In a Freemasons’ chopper do not intervene –
At least, not till after the pictures were taken.
Please someone explain how this view is mistaken!

Another strange image appeared on the News:
Two legs in dark stockings and feet with no shoes
And a bum sticking out from behind the back wheel
Of a double-decker bus. It just didn’t look real!
Surely if someone falls under a bus,
Their abdomen crushed by its wheels into mush,
Their bum would be soaked with the blood that was spurted
And if shoes were ripped off, their legs should be parted!
Emergency responders just walk on right past
They never look under, nor even aghast.
They don’t try to see if the body’s attached
Or if to a body those legs can be matched.

But the really disturbing facts of that day
Is that so many people had little to say.
That bridge would be teaming in the mid-afternoon.
There’d be screaming and chaos on many a phone.
And overlooking it so high in the sky
Are the packed tourist carriages of London’s great Eye.
Yet no images from there ‘ve appeared on the Net.
They had plenty of time to upload what they got.
For strangely it suddenly stopped at the time.
All who could possibly have witnessed the crime
Were kept on board until later that day,
When cameras and phones were all taken away.

How did the police think so quickly of that?
They don’t stop the Eye for just any report.
If a car had indeed caused so dreadful a scare
Many would have got off with pictures to share.
They couldn’t have missed it from that position.
Some tourists would just have the bridge in their vision.
It was the most dynamic part of the scene.
Yet not one youtube from there has there been.
Although they will say that they cannot release
Footage taken that day. It might ruin the case!
They did hand out footage from far far away.
So why is no image that’s closer okay?

Indeed, the suppression of footage is clear.
Every bus now has CCTV everywhere.
And there were several on the bridge at the time
So why can’t we see the rampage they claim?
There should have been CCTV on the street.
Yet the burgh of Westminster – alone – couldn’t meet
Or so it is claimed, the cost any more,
And removed all its cameras some months before!
Did they not think the centre of power need be watched?
Or is that paranoia? I doubt very much.
Nothing about this event makes much sense.
Did it really take place? There seems scant evidence.

On the bridge, some confusion must have occurred.
The police stopped all traffic, made everyone scared.
But did people die? Or was it all staged?
Was someone’s car really smashed up in a rage?
Why was a plywood board placed in between
The crumpled front bumper and the fence at the scene?
And why did the man who placed it right there
Have a mask on his face covering all but his hair?
He tampered with evidence, yet wasn’t arrested.
Is our willingness to believe what we’re told being tested –
That some terrorist cell would hit our highest community?
Or is it to buy us one hell of a photo opportunity?

A Jack and an ace
On a tattooed arm,
The card was placed
Like a voodoo charm.
Five hundred fell
In a lethal spray.
Over fifty lost
Their lives that day.

In a luxury suite
A rich man died,
Ten machine guns
Laid out by his side.
No motive
Links him to this crime.
No note was found,
No reason nor rhyme.

No brother or friend
Could comprehend
How this man could
Meet such an end.
How came he on so many a gun?
He gambled much, but just for fun.

He had no interest in death,
No debt possessed, no religious oath.
But even stranger, is it not,
That when five hundred had been shot,
They claim he shot himself right through
Rather than the coppers too!

They say he acted on his own.
But if so, why so many a gun?
If he genuinely was alone,
He’d kill no less with just the one,
And significantly reduce the risk
Of discovery of his evil plot
By nosey staff, who might well ask,
Or take a peek at what he’d brought.

What the police have not explained
Is how a concert goer knew
That many lives would that day end,
Well before the bullets flew.
Perhaps that story was made up.
But at least that witness should be found,
And the many others on the ground,
Who reported shots from all around.

The cops don’t seem to want it known,
That at the far end of the street
The Bellagio had a door blown in,
Unseeable from that fateful suite.
Could a bullet really ricochet
And smash that glass so far away?
Is it not much more astute
To assume more shooters were afoot?

Whatever that rich man intended
When he booked into his hotel suite,
No evidence can now be defended,
A plausible story to complete.
For despite this being the greatest crime
On US soil since W’s time,
The house where the alleged resided
Was burgled AFTER the cops had raided.

All evidence was thus compromised.
No later searches can be trusted.
Forensics could be planted lies.
How was this case so easily busted?
It really stinks of great collusion:
A mistake and desperate late solution
By creators of one blood-soaked lie
Who left their guns with the wrong dead guy!

The rich wage war
The poor must fight.
They know not whether
The cause is right.
For each target
Of their hates and dreads
The rich did sink
Into their heads
Through headline news
And murderous stunts.
“It’s fanatic MUSLIMS!”
An “expert” rants.
Yet none who grieves
May ask him why
He believes such men
Would want to die.
Nor why ID
Is always found –
Blown immaculately
Onto the underground,
Or left in a van
At the scene of the crime,
Or dropped from a plane
In the nick of time.
No reporter fears,
No detective tries,
To see if appearances
Merely are lies.
They don’t seem to worry
The footage was cropped,
Not possible, or blurry,
Or pure photoshopped!
What’s the chance on a day
When three stations are hit,
There’s a drill underway
Where the targets are that?
And why were the claims
Of folk shot by police
Never accounted for?
Nor have their names been released.
How could a hole
Be blown up through the floor
By a bomb on the shoulders
Of one of the four?
And why would the one
Who was left all alone,
When the train bombs were done
Ring his mates on his phone?
And why did he buy
A three-day return
If he went there to die,
Many virgins to earn?
And don’t say he bought it
To raise no suspicion.
He’d hardly have thought he’d
Reveal his grave mission
By purchasing a single-way
Fare for his ride.
That would hardly draw gazes
And cops to his side!
Why wasn’t the case
Against him thrown out
When it was shown to police
His train NEVER SET OUT –
The one that their witnesses
Saw him aboard
Was cancelled that day,
Yet the cops never heard!
For the story they gave
For a year from that time
Was that all four arrived
At the scene of the crime
Having taken the train
That was cancelled that day!
Do we buy their new story?
I say, “No way!”
It’s unlikely they even
Arrived at the scene,
They had so few seconds
To board the new train;
And once at the station
Encountered commotion,
Suggesting there’d already
Been an explosion.
Their supposed devices
Were highly unstable.
Yet all four were novices,
Entirely unable
To make the explosives
The story requires –
Dodging baths of corrosives
And paint-bucket fires.
To the very first experts
Attending the scene
Those charges were
Of a military strain.
Were they mistaken?
We cannot now know.
Autopsies weren’t taken,
Each carriage had to go.
But it’s worth pointing out
That none of the bodies
In the wreckage strewn about
Were those of the laddies
Who supposedly detonated
Rucksacks of stuff
That turned them to vapour?
Go on! I’ve heard enough!
Our security services
Can do no wrong!
They couldn’t be guilty
Of planting a bomb!
Or hypnotising
A convict in jail!
Or fake terrorising
When real terrors fail!
They ask for more money.
More resources they need –
More powers (it ain’t funny,
To stop lorries at speed?)
I say, lets look into
All secrets they hold.
Let’s re-interview
The poor men whom they’ve jailed.
Let junior detectives
The public select
Examine their secrets –
All footage inspect.
Give them power to arrest
Those suspected of crime,
Of allowing the deaths
And not acting on time,
Of managing terror
And denying their role.
Let’s punish their error
And put them in jail.
Only then can the poor
Of this country relax,
Knowing that the next war,
Or next rise in tax,
Is not being used
To further some goal
Of a few who, with money,
Our country control.