Pres. Barack Obama – Editor of the Harvard Law Review – Has No Law License???

I saw a note slide across the #TCOT feed on Twitter last night that mentioned Michelle Obama had no law license. This struck me as odd, since (a) she went to school to be a lawyer, and (b) she just recently held a position with the University of Chicago Hospitals as legal counsel — and that’s a pretty hard job to qualify for without a law license.

But being a licensed professional myself, i knew that every state not only requires licensure, they make it possible to check online the status of any licensed professional. So I did, and here’s the results from theARDC Website:

She “voluntarily surrendered” her license in 1993. Let me explain what that means. A “Voluntary Surrender” is not something where you decide “Gee, a license is not really something i need anymore, is it?” and forget to renew your license. No, a “Voluntary Surrender” is something you do when you’ve been accused of something, and you ‘voluntarily surrender” your license about five seconds before the state suspends (or disbars) you.

Here’s an illustration: I’m a nurse. At various times in my 28 years of nursing I’ve done other things when I got burned out; most notably a few years as a limousine driver; even an Amway salesman at one point. I always, always renewed my nursing license — simply becuase it’s easier to send the state $49.00 a month than to pay the $200, take a test, wate six weeks, etc., etc. . . I’ve worked (recently) in a Nursing Home where there was an 88 year old lawyer and a 95 year old physician. Both of them still had current licensures as well. They would never DREAM of letting their licenses lapse. I happen to know there is currently in the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City Indiana an inmate who is a licensed physician, convicted of murder when he chased the two burlars who entered his home and terrorized his family into the street and killed them. (And I can’t say i blame him for that, either.) This phisican still has an active medical license and still sees patients, writes prescriptions, etc all from inside the prison.

And he renews his medical licese every two years, too.

I tried looking up why she would “Voluntarily surrender” her licese, but Illinois does not have it’s 1993 records online.

But when I searched for “Obama”, I found this:

“Voluntarily retired” — what does that mean? Bill Clinton hung onto his law license until he was convicted of making a false statement in the Lewinsky case and had to “Voluntarily Surrender” his license too.

This is the former editor of the Harvard Law Review who doesn’t seem to give a crap about his law license.

Something else odd; while the Search feature brings up the names, any seaches for the Disciplinary actions ends quicky.

As in, Too Quickly. Less than a half-second quickly on a Search Engine that can take five seconds to Search for anything.

As in, “there’s a block on that information” kind of thing.

So we have the first Lawyer President and First Lady — who don’t actually have licenses to practice law.

There’s more to this story, I’m sure. I’ll let you know when I find it.

The Obamas discourage work in the private sector. “Don’t go into corporate America,” Michelle has exhorted youth. “Work for the community. Be social workers.” Shun the “money culture,” Barack added. “Individual salvation depends on collective salvation.”

“If you commit to serving your community,” he pledged in his Denver acceptance speech, “we will make sure you can afford a college education.” So, go through government to go to college, and then go back into government.

Many of today’s youth find the pitch attractive. “I may spend the rest of my life trying to create social movement,” said Brian Coovert of the Cincinnati chapter. “There is always going to be work to do. Until we have a perfect country, I’ll have a job.”

Not all the recruits appreciate the PC indoctrination. “It was too touchy-feely,” said Nelly Nieblas, 29, of the 2005 Los Angeles class. “It’s a lot of talk about race, a lot of talk about sexism, a lot of talk about homophobia, talk about -isms and phobias.”

One of those -isms is “heterosexism,” which a Public Allies training seminar in Chicago describes as a negative byproduct of “capitalism, white supremacy, patriarchy and male-dominated privilege.”

I used to be licensed to drive a school bus. I too kept the license current by paying the extra fee when I renewed my driver’s license, because it was easier than requalifying if I chose to return to the job.

I only let the bus part lapse when I became disabled and was certain I could never work again. Even then, I kept my regular driver’s license valid despite being unable to drive safely myself, because it allowed me to ride along as a licensed driver while my kids were using learner’s permits.

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he "fibbed" on […]

Did someone doctor the article entry, or did the ARDC website revise the info? According to today’s entry, the “last registered date of 1993″ isn’t there”.

{{The screen capture you see in the article was taken the day the article was written. If the ARDC website says something else, then somebody at the ARDC has altered it.}}

LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY’S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD

ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of March 10, 2010 at 1:19:32 PM:

Full Licensed Name: Michelle Obama
Full Former name(s): Michelle Lavaughn Robinson
Date of Admission as Lawyer
by Illinois Supreme Court: May 12, 1989
Registered Business Address: Not available online
Registered Business Phone: Not available online
Illinois Registration Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law
Malpractice Insurance:
(Current as of date of registration;
consult attorney for further information) No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.
Public Record of Discipline
and Pending Proceedings: None

It would be useful to edit your article before publishing because many doubters will use poor grammar or spelling as an excuse to dismiss these claims. They’ll say you’re an idiot. If the forces of liberty are to prevail, we cannot give people reasons to doubt the message.
Be polite, articulate, and educated every time.

{{Criticism noted and duly considered. However, I write like I speak, and if there are mis-spellings, they are from the hurry of trying to get the post to the people as soon as possible.

[…] https://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-harvard-law-review-has-no-law… I saw a note slide across the #TCOT feed on Twitter last night that mentioned Michelle Obama had no law license. This struck me as odd, since (a) she went to school to be a lawyer, and (b) she just recently held a position with the University of Chicago Hospitals as legal counsel — and that’s a pretty hard job to qualify for without a law license. […]

[…] As Johnny Alamo notes, “A ‘Voluntary Surrender’ is not something where you decide ‘Gee, a license is not really something i need anymore, is it?’ and forget to renew your license. No, a ‘Voluntary Surrender’ is something you do when you’ve been accused of something, and you ‘voluntarily surrender’ your license about five seconds before the state suspends (or disbars) you.” […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape chargesthat he “fibbed” on […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

[…] this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he "fibbed" on his bar […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape chargesthat he “fibbed” on […]

The former editor of the Harvard Law Review? No. Big difference between editor and president of the Harvard Law Review. Barack Obama was the former first african american President of the Harvard Law Review, he was never editor of the Harvard Law Review. (That involves a lot more writing.)

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

Johnny Alamo. You’re full of crap. Every point you referenced can’t be found on the IL site you included in your post. There is zero proof Obama or Michelle voluntarily surrendered diddly. If you have actual facts instead of carp, please share. Until then, thanks for your creative bullshit.

[…] First Lady – who don’t actually have licenses to practice law. Facts. Source: https://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law… 4. A senior lecturer is one thing… A fully ranked law professor is another. […]

[…] So, we have the first black President and First Lady, who don’t actually have licenses to practice law. Facts. Source: https://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law… […]

[…] “I saw a note slide across the #TCOT feed on Twitter last night that mentioned Michelle Obama had no law license. … She “voluntarily surrendered” her license in 1993. Let me explain what that means. A “Voluntary Surrender” is not something where you decide “Gee, a license is not really something i need anymore, is it?” and forget to renew your license. No, a “Voluntary Surrender” is something you do when you’ve been accused of something, and you “voluntarily surrender” your license five seconds before the state suspends you.” From: Pres. Barack Obama – Editor of the Harvard Law Review – Has No Law License??? […]

Insofar as it has been proven that Obama never went to Columbia,his Harvard Law degree is highly suspect,since a four year degree is REQUIRED for admission into Law School:http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=8279

[…] stand up for their own Bubba. Now this on the current White House Liars and con artists: https://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/…o-law-license/ __________________ As an American I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize […]

[…] stand up for their own Bubba. Now this on the current White House Liars and con artists: https://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/…o-law-license/ >>>What do they need those licenses for? They ain't practicing law. And when would they […]

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

well, i agree with most of this, but i will say that, with untold numbers of people searching the ARDC site daily, their databases would by design create a streamlined search that would return results for the Obamas faster than light.

Its truly amazing,I have never seen any president go through so many changes and questions about who and what our president is or was..I have gathered so much information on this man,that I seem to be rewritting the Manchurinen Candidate.Yet,he became our president.Makes you wonder,HOW!”You may say to yourself,or to others,did he buy off the electorial college?”He didn’t get the popular vote.Hilliary did,by several million.Was there some other reason that no one will offer a remark to what he realy is.What ever he is,is a question you should ask yourself every day.The man,is destroying this country within,Devide and conquer.Devide the parties so that either side can’t comprimise on anything.Refuse to make an actual budget,to curtail spending,destroy the economic structor of our great country,while looking down his nose and lying to everyone that he is doing his best to make things better,Place the blame on everyone,the past president,the republicans and the best is,that Americans are lazy.Well who made us that way.Who wants to work when the democrats pass another unemployment act of 99 weeks and then an extension after that of 40 more,then a third tier.It all sounds like Socialisim in the making.A third of the country works and the rest of it sits around and reaps the benifits.Lets blame the rich,bankrupt them,tax them so much that they no longer can afford to keep their companies working,down size,better yet,move your company to another country and fire all your faithful employies to add to the debt of our country.No one paying taxes,homless people and Vets standing on the corner begging…I say no!”Thats why I have thrown my hat in the ring for the Presidency.I will not let our,my country die by the way side.Dump the electorial college and let the people speak.Let our vote count for something!”

Many affirmative action graduates are not required to take licensing exams. I know both Obamas were affirmative action students but Michelle Obama was a legitimate bright honors student. Her husband was excused from his requirements and exams. (We got the wrong Obama as president).

That said, both Obamas have multiple social security numbers and Barack Obama used the name Barry Soetoro for many years including his school years. When he applied for his law license he denied having gone by another name. This itself could cause his license to be suspended, but I’m sure there are plenty more snakes in his past. I don’t think he could pass the Bar Exam!

The law was changed several months after his multiple social security numbers were discovered by a thorough private eye. This was either one or two years ago. The law now says using another person’s social security number is only a misdemeanor if one uses one’s own name with that number. Previously this was a felony. The SS number Barack Obama currently uses originated in CT over 100 years ago!

Why is there no one to enforce the few laws we still have on the books to protect us?

“The Obamas do NOT have multiple social security numbers. This is plain false and any idiot that believes this needs to fact check or visit snopes.”

First, “Vince” (if that **IS** your real name, which I doubt . . . It’s documented that the Obamas have several SSNs. Google it, whine-boy. Second, the President’s SSN waqs issued in Connecticut (where he’s never lived) and is issued to a man over 102 years old. That’s plain evidence of a major discrepancy right there. Your failure to recognize this simple discrepancy is either (and I’m being charitable here) evidence of either (a) chronic alcohol use on your part, (b) chronic drug use on your part, or (c) cranial-rectal subluxation on your part. None of it is evidence of idiocy on our part. Third, Snopes is run by lefties funded by George Soros. It’s more compliocated than that, but I’m sure your poor widdle head is hurting from your night of alcohol-fueld trolling, and you need your sleep. The post is on the blog. Look it up, dimwit.

Facts cannot be denied.If you are up front and are not afraid of the truth, than you have nothing to hide.Then, Why did Obama hide everything he is and keep the public from delving into his past.It seems that,we as a people have the constitutional right to look into Obama’s past and see exactly who and what he is,under the freedom of information act.Why.because Obama has lied to everyone in this country and his job is to take down America from within.Look up U tube,Obama admits he is a muslim and while you are in that area,his wife admits he was born in Kenya,in front of an audiance.I can’t make this up.It comes from their own lips…Remember,READ MY LIPS…WELL READ HIS!”

I know that its a big thing to say,the Obama’s do not have a law licence.The fact of the matter is and I hate to say anything good about those people,but you do not have to have a licence to be President.I myself,don’t have one,but I do have 2 PhD’s,one of which is in criminal and Constitunal law.The other is in forensic science.I am a presidential candidate and can see everyones point and agree with everyone of why would you volentary give it up.After all those years of hard work and determination to become an attorney,Makes no sence to me,unless it was for a specific reason,or face judicial repromand and maybe face time and the loss of your licence forever…its your guess.Thats why all his records are sealed and why is the government allowing this.Under the freedom of information act,it should not be sealed,or is it a mark of national security.After he is no longer he has to allow it to be expelled and int the lime light.Either way,he must have a reason to be afraid of his past and the democracts are in it with him….

Is anyone really surprised? What would surprise me is to find out that any 2 consecutive sentences that either Michelle or BO has ever spouted – is/was actually true. Some folks simply cannot speak without telling whoppers!

[…] Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on […]

[…] black President and First Lady – who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts. Source: https://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/…o-law-license/ 4. A senior lecturer is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a […]

Is anyone surprised? The man is a pathological liar and Trojan Horse. HE took advantage of his performance in 2004 at the DNC and people who are all to eager to push affirmative action chose a man who never would have been chosen on his merits -he had none. All he had were associations with the most anti-American people there are and a vacant history. It was insane to elect this man. It would be mind-boggling to REELECT him now that we know all the stuff people refused to believe is actually true.

What troubles me most of all is, that our mainstream media seems to ignore anything and everything about the Obamas that is negative and the truth. It is absolutely deplorable that it is not ‘We the People” who elect a president, it is OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA. There ought to be a supervisory agency who would put journalism on the right page again.

This is old news. Andy Martin discovered that they both had relinquished their law licenses when researching his book “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask”, which was published in 2008. He also pointed out that this is something that a lawyer would never do, unless about to be subject to disciplinary action. He wasn’t able to find the reasons behind it though, as they, like many other things regarding Obama, are well hidden.

[…] I knew they had both lost their law license, but I didn’t know why until I read this. This is 100% legit. I check it out at https://www.iardc.org/ Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Committee. It’s the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois ; and they are very strict. (Talk about irony.) Even I, at the advanced age of almost 65, maintain (at the cost of approximately $600/year) my law license that I worked so hard and long to earn. Big surprise. Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and U.S. President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address. Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A “Voluntary Surrender” is not something where you decide “Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?” and forget to renew your license. No, a “Voluntary Surrender” is something you do when you’ve been accused of something, and you ‘voluntarily surrender” your license before the state suspends you. 2 Michelle Obama “voluntarily surrendered” her law license in 1993, after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud! 3. Facts.Source: https://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/ 4. A senior lecturer is one thing; a fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law Professor at the University of Chicago . 5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) “served as a professor” in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008. 6. “He did not hold the title of Professor of Law,” said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University Of Chicago School Of Law . Source:http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html 7. The former Constitutional Senior Lecturer (Obama) cited the U.S. Constitution during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence … not the Constitution. 8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/ 9. Free Republic : In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal. 10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion; our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. 11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech? When you are a phony it’s hard to keep facts straight. Keep this moving — educate others TCC: YOU BETTER WAKE UP AMERICA! This entry was posted in Keep the "Change". Bookmark the permalink. ← Remember THIS next time you’re stretching YOUR budget! […]

He also pointed out that this [surrendering a law license] is something that a lawyer would never do, unless about to be subject to disciplinary action.

Obviously, he’s not a lawyer, and he hangs with the wrong crowd. A lot of attorneys who get into a job where a license isn’t required go on dormant status. Otherwise they have to keep up with stiff CLE requirements, pay a bunch of fees — and for what? Elected officials putting their licenses in dormant status is common. That author doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

[…] the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud! 3. Facts.Source: https://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/…o-law-license/ 4. A senior lecturer is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a […]

[…] UPDATE 8-22-21: I noticed Tweeters are still talking about Michelle’s law license, as well as BO’s. I found this informtion at Alamo City Pundit, who says he is an attorney as well and talks about having and giving up a law lic… […]
{{ACP’s Note: Actually, the author of this article was a Nurse, and never claimed to be an attorney.}}

You’ve been hoaxed. Don’t spread the hoax further. President Obama, and his wife, are on inactive status with the Illinois Bar, because they are not practicing law. Being President of the U.S. occupies all of the President’s time.

{{No, apparently playing GOLF appears to occupy this POTUS’s time, actually. And for an apparent”Republican”, this is, what. You’re fifth or sixth comment decrying this article, Libbot. Thanks got stopping by, and unclench, please!}}

The people running this ought be very scrupulous about getting O & his wife. Don’t you understand you can get them with facts and not innuendos. She did not “surrender” her license. Why do you say something not in the record? The license issue is a non-starter. Let’s talk about the millions they waste on fabulous vacations or the umpteen tzars he has created or the numerous decrees he has made circumventing Congress. etc., etc. Talk about stuff where insanity is not the word for the day!

[…] Alamo City Pundit says he is not an attorney and talks about having and giving up a law license: “Voluntarily retired” — what does that mean? Bill Clinton hung onto his law license until he was convicted of making a false statement in the Lewinsky case and had to “Voluntarily Surrender” his license too. […]

OK, I’ll buy this. I have seen this before, as most of us have. And, I am heavily Anti Obama, as I was Anti Bush.
BUT, as the Writer states, the online record does not give details of WHY the Law Licenses were surrendered. But, that paper files DO state why.
So, my question is this:
In a world where we know the intimate details of the lives of the Kardashian Clan and Paris Hilton and Lindsey Lohan, yet there is not even ONE Investigative Reporter that wants to make a name for themselves by getting this information about the Obama’s? Including his College Application as a Foreign Aid Student? And, his passport information showing where he was and if what country in the 1980’s? And, his College Transcripts and grades??? I find that hard to believe. Yet, 50 years later, we STILL don’t know who killed JFK! Conspiracy??? II don’t know. But, likely.

Not to be disrespectful, but I also looked at the Illinois list of surrendered licenses. Michelle Obama’s showed up. Barack Obama’s DID NOT. That was about a year ago. And, as a professional licensed nurse, I know that most people that work incredibly hard to obtain a license, don’t just surrender it without cause. Nurses, for example, usually surrender their license when they are called before the board for disciplinary action that would normally involve prosecution in addition to having the license involuntarily stripped. To forego the charges that might land them in jail, they “voluntarily surrender” their licenses. Another thing that makes this even more plausible when applied to Obama is the covered up Harrison J Bounell real estate fraud that was tracked back directly to him and Michelle via her own cell phone, and their Chicago address. I believe if that mystery is ever completely solved, along with the persons that helped to cover it up, you will know why they voluntarily surrendered their licenses–if indeed he ever had one. I find it odd that she is the only Obama to be showing up when I check the info, though it does show on this page with Obama’s license appearing on the same format which I saw her name on.

He was elected President of the Harvard Law review, by fellow law students. According to what I have read, he damaged the review so badly that it took two years to repair it and get it back into favor among the Legal Community. Evidently he did that as well as he has handled being president…likes the title not the work.
I have talked to lawyers, they tell me that right behind…”voluntarily surrender your license to practice law” is….”or a warrant will be issued for your arrest”.

[…] attention focused on their right hand while they pick your pocket with their left. For a lawyer who voluntarily surrendered his law license, Barack Obama has proven an exceptional ability to frame the public […]

randydutton asks: “…Under what circumstances would a court order inactive status where the lawyer is not at fault of wrong doing?…” I don’t know about Illinois, but in Florida (where I am a member), failure to pay annual dues or to complete required Continuing Legal Education would be two examples.

FACTCheck.org seems to go out of their way to misrepresent this article. I’ve seen generals “quietly” retire in order to avoid scandals. Why not a couple lawyers that the Illinois Bar didn’t want to have a scandal about.

[…] choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud! 3. Facts. Source: Pres. Barack Obama ? Editor of the Harvard Law Review ? Has No Law License??? | Alamo City Pundit 4. A senior lecturer is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT […]

[…] her the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud! 3. Facts. Source 4. A senior lecturer is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a […]

[…] writing for the periodical. Barack Obama, Harvard Law Review editor, March 19, 1990 – latimes.com Pres. Barack Obama – Editor of the Harvard Law Review – Has No Law License??? | Alamo Ci… I note the following entry in Wikipedia: The president of the Harvard Law Review is elected […]

Obama lost his license because he lied on his application. Fancy that! Michelle lost her license because of some fraud deal she was involved in and was told to either voluntarily lose it or she would be disbarred. Giving the license up doesn’t leave a stain on your record like being disbarred.

[…] Pres. Barack Obama – Editor of the Harvard Law Review – Has No Law License??? – (h/t:L) 2009 article which cites good sources. There’s more to this story, but in the end, politics in 2013 America serves as a distraction, not a mechanism for fixing what ails the USA. […]

Figures this website if from Texas… The actual truth is not important…. Of course, I’ll show you on Snopes.com that this is not true. You will dispute Snopes, and say it is a Liberal organization. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp How about Factcheck?