Wow.. I've seen you ****in blast people all over and off this board.. Take a break from it, but I think you have too many manly friendships here to just bolt off due to a ****in raider fan?
I mean god damn.

I've worked at a few restaurants in my day and the place I work at is so poorly ran it is almost disgusting. However, business is always good so $$$ is good enough where I don't let it drive me TOO crazy.

I've worked at a few restaurants in my day and the place I work at is so poorly ran it is almost disgusting. However, business is always good so $$$ is good enough where I don't let it drive me TOO crazy.

What do they do poorly, and what should they do instead?

__________________
9/3/2016:

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

ball on the 7 and you can't even get 3.....yeah MU still has no QB and no line

Yeah, I tend to lean that way. Like I said, I agree that it's probably borderline, and I'd probably have done something about it had it gone on for more than a few pages of a thread. However, it's not like he was saying "I have a picture in my possession of Dane butt ****ing a little kid" or anything. No one seriously thought Dane was a pedophile.

No arguments.

people CHOOSE to leave

it's always about being childish and dramatic

this doesn't even rank on the list of all time great "I'm leaving the planet" threads...(and i am ****ing serious, there are ****ing rules people...christ)

everyone knows this board allows people to say awesomely offensive things, without regard for your internet fee fees....and you - as an adult- can choose whether or not you're going to pretend to be butt hurt about it

This message board has always been the wild west. Everyone's line as far as what is acceptable and what isn't is different. But community-wide the following seem to be acceptable:

1. assigning an untrue sexual orientation
2. indicating that someone would have sexual relations with their own mother or other family member
3. indicating that someone would have sexual relations with a different species
4. indicating that someone would have sexual relations with a dead person

Calling someone a pedophile is a worse than the above, but not greatly so.

In general, the insults of the types listed below do not materially damage the reputation of the person at which they are thrown because they are recognized as insults.

In a just system, rules are applied uniformly regardless of the popularity of the conflicted parties.

Dane is a good poster, and I will miss his contributions. But I don't think the mods acted incorrectly, given the community standards of this board.