Senate Republicans on Thursday derailed a bill to aid people who got sick after
exposure to dust from the World Trade Center's collapse in the Sept. 11 attack.

Supporters were three votes short of the 60 needed to proceed to debate and
a final vote on the bill that would have provided as much as $7.4 billion in
health care and compensation to 9/11 responders and survivors. The bill failed
on a test vote, 57-42.

Fifty-seven Democrats voted for the bill and 41 Republicans opposed it. Sen.
Harry Reid, the Democratic leader, switched his vote to 'no' at the last moment,
a parliamentary move that allows him to bring the measure up again for a vote.

The New York Times reports:

Republicans have been raising concerns about how to pay for the $7.4 billion
measure, while Democrats, led by Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand of New York,
have argued that the nation had a moral obligation to assist those who put their
lives at risk during rescue operations at ground zero....

In a statement, [New York City Mayor Michael] Bloomberg chastised Senate Republicans
for their "wrong-headed political strategy" and called on them to
allow the bill to come to the floor for a vote. "The attacks of 9/11 were
attacks on America," he said, "and we have a collective responsibility
to care for the heroes -- from all 50 states -- who answered the call
of duty, saved lives, and helped our nation recover."

Backers of the legislation see this lame-duck session of Congress as possibly
its last chance. The bill has passed the House.

Republican senators have promised not to consider any other bills until the
Senate acts on funding the government and extending tax cuts.

The defeat was a huge blow to New York and New Jersey lawmakers who have long
fought for the measure, arguing it's morally wrong to not do more for the health
needs of ailing 9/11 responders and survivors.

"We should not have to wait for tax deals to do what's right," said
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., a lead advocate of the bill.

Facing long odds, supporters will try to attach the 9/11 bill to the legislation
that emerges from the tax deal. They'll also press for another vote once the
tax issue is settled.

Critics questioned whether the bill is affordable and does enough to ensure
that only people with illnesses related to trade center dust get help.

Senate Republicans on Thursday derailed a bill to aid people who got sick after
exposure to dust from the World Trade Center's collapse in the Sept. 11 attack.

Supporters were three votes short of the 60 needed to proceed to debate and
a final vote on the bill that would have provided as much as $7.4 billion in
health care and compensation to 9/11 responders and survivors. The bill failed
on a test vote, 57-42.

Fifty-seven Democrats voted for the bill and 41 Republicans opposed it. Sen.
Harry Reid, the Democratic leader, switched his vote to 'no' at the last moment,
a parliamentary move that allows him to bring the measure up again for a vote.

Backers of the legislation see this lame-duck session of Congress as possibly
its last chance. The bill has passed the House.

Republican senators have promised not to consider any other bills until the
Senate acts on funding the government and extending tax cuts.

The defeat was a huge blow to New York and New Jersey lawmakers who have long
fought for the measure, arguing it's morally wrong to not do more for the health
needs of ailing 9/11 responders and survivors.

"We should not have to wait for tax deals to do what's right," said
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., a lead advocate of the bill.

Facing long odds, supporters will try to attach the 9/11 bill to the legislation
that emerges from the tax deal. They'll also press for another vote once the
tax issue is settled.

Critics questioned whether the bill is affordable and does enough to ensure
that only people with illnesses related to trade center dust get help.

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content,
and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will
not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements
contained in this article.

Fair Use Notice
This page contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political
issues relating to alternative views of the 9/11 events, etc. We believe
this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
"fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.