Walters v Trump Amicus Curiae
Recommendations for International Death Warrants

Electronic Attack in NV begins with
Digitigal Oceans In New York City
Reno, NV 7/20/2017

Press Release:
I have been visiting Reno for about 10 days and as you can see from
the attachments the amount of computer hacking going on all over the
town is a major risk to anyone using the internet.
If you choose to vacation or visit Reno is it worth the risk your
email accounts or even possibly your banking information may be
compromised by the casual use of the internet.
Best Wishes CW
Possible Suspect: Ben Uretsky CEO
Digital Oceans
ben@digitalocean.com
cc: phillip.smith@usdoj.gov, John.P.Burns@usdoj.gov ,
aline.flodr@usdoj.gov,sagar.ravi@usdoj.gov, eli.mark@usdoj.gov,
jacob.warren@usdoj.gov,legal@digitalocean.com,press@digitalocean.com,
ben@digitalocean.com,communityaffairs@nypd.org,website@dhses.ny.gov,
NYAG.Pressoffice@ag.ny.gov,sheriffweb@washoecounty.us,askrpd@reno.gov,
cscage@dps.state.nv.us,bhahn@da.washoecounty.us,aginfo@ag.nv.gov,
DAInfo@ClarkCountyDA.com,ccdista@ClarkCountyNV.gov,PIO@lvmpd.com,
caldeirar@reno.gov,oliverj@reno.gov,garciaj@reno.gov,oliverj@reno.gov,
esparzac@reno.gov,press@starbucks.com,ASilver@TheChamberNV.org,
TAbney@TheChamberNV.org, mberkbigler@washoecounty.us,
blucey@washoecounty.us,vhartung@washoecounty.us,jherman@washoecounty.us,
producers@ktvn.com,pressrelease@newsreview.com,

Complaint Filed With
Internet Fraud Center 7/23/2017

US Attorney General John Mitchell, Haldeman
Erlichman; Dean Blessed With 200 Years in Federal Prison

1. Violation of Counsels papers was used to prosecute US Attorney General John Mitchell, Haldemann, Erlichman, and Dean and 40 some
off other federal employees who were blessed with collective 200 years in federal prison by USDC Judge Maxmimum John Sirrica The breakin at
the Watergate Hotel was the beginning of the end for renagade law enforcement activities whose neutering was supervised by US Senator
Frank Church Chairman of US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, (D)Idaho
2. Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution
or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason
of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year,
or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or
threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;
and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap,
aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or
imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Addressed Too
Special Agent in Charge Aaron C. Rouse
1787 West Lake Mead Boulevard
Las Vegas, NV 89106-2135
lasvegas.fbi.gov
(702) 385-1281
I recently retired from 30 years doing investigative and survey
processes for Congress as you can see from enclosure. I recently
arrived in Reno, NV and as you can see from 2nd enclosure noted
some type of computer hacking and something call FBI-spider.
As you can see from 3rd enclosure we have a court ordered
do not contact or communicate and the many instances of
computer hacking submitted to Congress generally involved
misguided law enforcement personnel:
http://cwaltersgonefishing.net/hssecurity/spywareact/index16.htm
In the unlikely event your staff needs to see me simply
send me an email
Regards Chris Walters
335 Record Street
Reno, NV 89512
PS Most of the computer hacking events ended as the online
document suggest when the Obama Administration retired.
Service of Process
stacy.parobek@mail.house.gov,kyle.thomas@mail.house.gov,
joleen_rivera@cortezmasto.senate.gov,gillian_block@cortezmasto.senate.gov,
lasvegas.fbi.gov,USANV.VWC@usdoj.gov,USANV.VWC@usdoj.gov,chris_frey@fd.org,
aginfo@ag.nv.gov,districtattorney@da.washoecounty.us
lasvegas.fbi.gov,askrpd@reno.gov,sheriffweb@washoecounty.us

Nevada Statute For Self-defense Against Attempted Murder
or Great Bodily Harm (Deadly Force)

The “Stand Your Ground” laws gained a lot of attention after the shooting and killing of Trayvon Martin.
Nevada has its own stand your ground law, but unlike some states, in Nevada the person claiming a defense under the stand your
ground law cannot be the original aggressor.
In Nevada, the use of deadly force is justifiable in certain circumstances to prevent that person from taking your life.
According to NRS 200.200 a person can kill another in self-defense if it appears that:•The danger was so urgent and pressing that,
in order to save the person’s own life, or to prevent the person from receiving great bodily harm, the killing of the other was
absolutely necessary; and
•The person killed was the assailant, or that the slayer had really, and in good faith, endeavored to decline any
further struggle before the mortal blow was given.
A person may have a defense of justifiable homicide if the killing of another person was necessary self-defense and according to NRS 200.120 has no duty to retreat before using deadly force if:
•The person is not the original aggressor;
•Has a right to be present at the location where deadly force is used; and
•Is not actively engaged in conduct in furtherance of criminal activity at the time deadly force is used.
According to NRS 200.160, homicide in Nevada is also justifiable if committed when used:
•In the lawful defense of the slayer, or his or her husband, wife, parent, child, brother or sister, or of any other person
in his or her presence or company, when there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design on the part of the person slain
to commit a felony or to do some great personal injury to the slayer or to any such person, and there is imminent danger of such design being accomplished; or
•In the actual resistance of an attempt to commit a felony upon the slayer, in his or her presence, or upon or in a dwelling,
or other place of abode in which the slayer is.
The person using deadly force in self-defense, however, must have more than a bare fear. The circumstances that ignited the fear
must be sufficient to excite the fears of a reasonable person and the party acting in self-defense must truly act under those fears and not in revenge.
If a person is charged with a homicide and it is determined that it was a justifiable homicide then the person will be acquitted of all charges and be discharged.

Self-defense to Protect Property or Against Home Invasion

A person may use self-defense to protect their property or during a home invasion. Even the use of deadly force may be necessary
and appropriate depending on the situation. According to NRS 200.120, a person may commit justifiable homicide while protecting their
home or property against a person who intends, by violence or surprise, to commit a felony or against a person who intends, in a
iolent, riotous, tumultuous, or surreptitious manner, to enter the home of another for the purpose of assaulting or offering
personal violence to any person in the dwelling.
Again, the person using deadly force in self-defense has no duty to retreat if:
•The person is not the original aggressor;
•Has a right to be present at the location where deadly force is used; and
•Is not actively engaged in conduct in furtherance of criminal activity at the time deadly force is used.
Also, again the person using the deadly force in self-defense must have a fear in the circumstances that a reasonable person would
have in the same circumstances and be truly acting on those fears and not in revenge. In Nevada, if a person has knowledge of another
person committing a home invasion or burglary of their residence and has reasonable fear of death or bodily injury, that person may use
deadly force and does not have to fear civil repercussions from personal injury or wrongful death suits.
In Nevada, a residence is defined as a house, room, apartment, tenement or other building, vehicle, vehicle trailer, semitrailer,
house trailer or boat designed or intended for occupancy as a residence.For many, the use of force, whether deadly or not, is not an
everyday occurrence and is not a welcomed activity, but nonetheless sometimes is necessary to protect yourself, another, or your property.