This video is so dumb on so many levels. Female and male orgasms are very similar in amount of pleasurability in general. Plus, individually, there are many men who find it more difficult to get aroused then the average woman, pretty much debunking this video. The idea that women are harder to please as a rule is simply a myth.(No, you can’t just tug on my penis and expect me to feel good…) The G-spot does exist. Saying it doesn’t exist is saying that the prostatic fluid excreted by the g-spot doesn’t exist. This would mean women would be unable to “get wet.” The “squirting” often related to the apparently mythical prostate(seriously) can also be achieved by men, by, you guessed it, stimulating the prostate. Vibrators, as so openly recommended in this video, often lead to numbing of the nerves you’ve got down there. It’s a good idea to not use them unless you plan on escalating. Same goes for men of course. Masturbation should be limited unless you plan on doing it your whole life. Otherwise, be prepared for your significant other to disappoint you in bed, and it’ll probably be mostly your fault. Anyway, if you think that the female orgasm is something magical then you are an idiot.﻿

What’s worse than behavioral, sociological and consumerist propaganda disguised as journalism? The same, disguised as “science”.

This video is wrong on so many levels. It’s also an ad for vibros.

1. Most women will have hard time having an orgasm just by clitoridal stimulation as the clitoris is just the “controller” end of a large nerve circuit going through the whole body AND the brain, that have both to be stimulated for the clitoris to be sensible.

2. In fact the clitoris is pretty much like a tiny penis inside-in that has lots of nerve ends in the bulb end, going out to different parts of the body.

3. Better yet, the Vagina, as it’s being aroused, gets flowed by blood like the penis making it slightly inflated thus more sensitive to better welcome or endure sexual penetrations.

4. And not only does the G-Spot exists, but other “spots” like the D(eep)-Spot exist too, except they’re nothing like buttons or spots, but rather sub-skin wall zone with specific arousal nerve endings that can be stimulated by both touch and pressure, located respectively in the early upper part of the vaginal canal and the upper or lower part of the back of the uterus cavity.

5. And obviously, orgasm is greatly conditioned by the body condition, stress points being the best indicator of bad condition, and mind condition, mainly depending on fantasies, love, hate, whatever the situation.

6. Finally, squirting, not as in getting wet but literally having female ejaculation, exists too, and it’s the case that requires to go past this kind of propaganda bullshit to actually work the whole body (and mind) condition. —-

Now that you know, why not knowing more? As I said, propaganda. But why?

1. Sexually contempt women, are happy women. And happy women are less insecure, less gullible to propaganda or ads , more open, consume less and make men happy. And happy men are less insecure, less gullible and consume less etc…Not for the powers the be.

2. Only the smartest women and men will understand, but this is in tune with the current neo-feminism propaganda. Why would a movement that started by promoting women as being more than sexual object, became so corrupted that it now both presents women has being empowered/liberated mainly by sex AND being targeted (you now, self-victimization) just as sexual objects, thus insidiously reinforcing the image that they are?

3. The reason is as cited in 1. but Why? Because the powers that be would have you believe that Earth is too populated, and every propaganda influencing men and women you’ll see will encourage you not to have children, which is the cement of families, and if couples are essentialized to mainly sex activities as sex becomes a commodity, why be a couple at all?

4. Because a whole society of single growing men and women consumes WAY more than families. And individuals being isolated are WAY more easier to control and influence. And the same way neo-feminism is destroying equality, don’t think that in this future society women will be considered as equal consumers. In fact when social interactions, seduction and sex become so rationalized and merchandized that they become commodities to be consumed, you’ll see a whole lower-class of sex-workers exchanging money or favors for sex as easily and indifferently as people swipe or match on Tinder.

5. As for a whole grand plans for the future world, is that good or bad? Because if such a society of standardized living means consuming less resources, producing less material products, thus polluting less, and more importantly equalizing standard living everywhere in the world, why not? Because something perverted that is being spread insidiously and without consent always turns out to be the worse.﻿