Normally, I would treat this sort of interview as a self-advertisement, at the expense of Russia’s taxpayers. However, Mr. Cristal went way far from the beaten path of national security officers peddling their business. He presented an ethno-genesis theory for the modern jihad movement, only very slightly reflective of Lev Gumilev’s, and concluded that Islamo-fascism is unbeatable, as long as Islam exists, because Islam today is the same “age” Christianity was at the time of the Inquisition. He offered to examine the age of culture. He also implied that Islamo-fascism is a historical and logical development of Islam, and that’s why there are no methods to stop terrorism and to defeat it.

Drawing parallels between terrorism and religion, Moty Christal forgot to clarify what age Judaism was at the beginning of 20th century, when followers of this religion orchestrated the Red Terror in Russia after the anti-government coup, or “color revolution” in 1917.

Very recently, during the blunt attempt to take over the Schneersohn library, Israel and the Chabad-Lubavitch organizations had threatened Russia with prosecution, similar to the process over Hitler’s Germany, claiming that Soviet government was persecuting people of Jewish nationality. Since Germany has reduced to a trickle its enormous payments to the state of Israel and other Jewish organizations, they have decided to find another cash cow, and to milk the Russian people instead. I have very few doubts that if Russia had surrendered the Schneersohn collection to Chabad, it would then face claims of a holocaust of Jews in Soviet Russia.

In August 2010 a federal judge in Washington, Royce Lamberth, ruled that the Hasidim proved the legitimacy of their claims to the ancient Jewish books and manuscripts, opening a very curious precedent for treating ownership of arts and antiquities in accordance with their creators’ provenance and nationality. Say, British museums are packed to the brim with stolen art, manuscripts and artifacts. Using the decision of this court, the countries of origin should just immediately demand the return of all those treasures that were stolen from them by the British. First, the British so called “royal family” should return one the Russian Imperial crowns that was stolen from Russia, and that their queen is not ashamed to wear publicly.

The case of the Schneersohn library is relevant here, due to the message that President Putin conveyed at a meeting with representatives of the European Jewish Congress in September 2014:

“The decision to nationalize the Schneersohn library was made by the first Soviet government, members of which were Jews. There was about 80 to 85% of Jews in this government. However, it was them who, directed by false ideological considerations went to conduct repressions and arrests of many Orthodox Christians and followers of Judaism, and representatives of other religions, including Muslims. They combed up all.[meaning, they were repressing and arresting everybody in the country.] These ideological blunders and false ideology, thank God, have collapsed.”

What’s not in this video is a statement of fact that they collected an enormous amount of documents to substantiate his statement. Essentially, President Putin told to the representatives of the European Jewish Congress that it was Russia that might start the tribunal process on the account of the holocaust of Russians by the first Soviet government that was 80 to 85% Jewish, the rest were ethnic Ukrainians, militants from the Baltics, and also Georgians, and Polish militants.

Considering, that 90% of my family had perished during the Red Terror, and considering that my parents have never received any compensation for the death of their relatives neither from Jewish organizations, nor from Germany, I am in full support of such undertaking.

Notably, President Putin’s statement made the right impression, because claims for the return of the collection and other reparations had died out immediately. But not without some terror acts, like an arson at the library of the Russia’s Academy of Social Sciences INION in Moscow in February 2015, that destroyed a huge amount of documents pertaining to the holocaust and also to the history of Jews in Russia, and the Soviet Union.

Coming back to this very curious actor, Moty Cristal, who has been a professor of Professional Practice in Negotiation Dynamics at the Moscow School of Management Skolkovo since 2011.

In one of his tweets, Mr. Cristal complains that his “client” “cynically inserted him into Hotel Ukraina in Moscow” with the view of the flags of the EU and Israel, and the view of Russia’s Parliament building. The same building that was targeted and burned during the US takeover of the Soviet government, with the direct participation of the Israeli security services.

What Israeli national security people are teaching Russian specialists, poisoning their minds with fallacies and recruiting future members of the Russian elite as Israeli secret services agents?

Are there any Russian Orthodox military or national secure officers teaching in the Technion, in Jerusalem University, in Haifa University?
What kind of views do theses “political activist” have towards Russia and it’s government?
I also would want a disclosure on what kind of “operational networks” this “political activist” designs in Russia and for whom? Who are his clients?

What propelled me to write this post, is not just a statement by Mr. Cristal that violent Islam follows in the footsteps of violent Christianly. The Islamo-fascism from its very beginning was socially-engineered and funded by the governments of the US and EU members and Israel. It’s useless to keep insisting that jihad is a historical process coming from the within of the Islam, when the US authorities openly admit that it was them who midwifed the terrorists into existence. “… the US and Turkey created ISIS, are arming and funding it to this very day, and are using the existence and atrocities of their own proxy forces.”

I find it uncanny that the Russia Today interview with Mr. Cristal coincided with the February 14th 2016 SANA News report on a seizure in Syria of a large amount of ammunition made in Israel. ” Earlier on Saturday, the Syrian government authorities, in cooperation with the popular committees, seized hundreds of U.S. and Israeli-made anti-tank mines loaded in a pickup in the western countryside of Sweida. The weapons were bound for the terrorists in eastern al-Badiya (desert). The arms and ammunition which were confiscated included 7 Israeli-made anti-tank rocket launchers, 62 shells, 128 RPG shells of different kinds, 43 120 mm mortar rounds, 42 82 mm mortar rounds and 100 23 mm machinegun bullets.”

“Immediately after the Odessa Khatyn, I reported on the curious Israelis who actively participated in the events of May 2.
If you remember, I have reported about the video that a British journalist recorded in the center of Odessa with the use of his Google glasses. In the video, we can see a group of English speaking foreigners in the midst of a crowd of Ukrainian Nazis. One of them says to the journalist that the group was directly participated in these events. (He states it openly on the video). Speaking in a fluent English he says that he is a citizen of Israel and the USA. Suddenly, he realizes that he is being recorded on video. He loses his mojo, his English suddenly “deteriorates” and he retreats. His hands are protected by rubber gloves, and his accomplices are holding some tubes, bottles, packages.

When I reported this video, I was suddenly attacked from different sides. At first, it was said that I made it up, and that there was no video with the Israeli in it. After I presented this video showing the guy who clearly calls himself a citizen of Israel, I got screamed at that this guy “just misspoke”, that he “blurted it out without thinking” and that most likely he was an Arab, and not a Jew. Even so, I have never said anything about his ethnicity.

Well, getting back to the subject. I just found some photos of this gentleman by the name Gonen Siboni. In first photo, he is in Odessa on may 2, 2014. And on the other three images. He is in 2008. Do you recognize the uniform he is wearing? Is it Palestinian or the IDF?

In anticipating of “so what?”, I just want to note: neither in my first post, nor today do I argue that this fighter of the IDF is guilty of something. It’s possible that he, being a medical student, happened to be in the crowd of murderous Nazis, and accidentally started to help the wounded. As he now claims. But, there are a number of legitimate questions. For example, why did they accidentally walk through Odessa with medical equipment, and wearing rubber gloves? How did they know in advance that someone will be killed and wounded? Or, why did this fighter suddenly forget English when he realized that he was being recorded?

Back, in May 2014, I had recommended to question these IDF soldiers, in order to clarify their role in the event. (I reiterate: Siboni voluntarily told to the British journalist that he was participating in this event!). At the very least, it was the Ukrainian SBU that make a statement that for the burning of Russians in Odessa some kind of strange chemicals were used. In this regard, it is legitimate to ask those Israelis what kind of substance was in their tubes and bottles, right? Do you think authorities have asked this question from this activist? Oh, I doubt!..
On May 7th, 2014 he had posted on his page in the social network vkontakte (Russian facebook): “Home!” (Presumably, was quickly evacuated to Israel). Since then he has been laying low. He’s silent to this day. Curious, isn’t it?..”

Odessa Hatyn Strange English speaking people

The victims of terror and their families deserve justice and swift revenge. If terrorist wannabes knew that revenge will come to them fast and furious, they would be less inclined to participate in activities like burning women, children and men alive in Odessa. There is an investigation conducted by Russia’s law enforcement. If Gonen Siboni is not a terrorist, he has nothing to hide. He should go to Moscow and talk to the investigators about what had happened in Odessa. If he had helped injured people, as he claims, those people should be alive and they should be able to confirm that he and other Israelis from his group helped them. He should reveal who were the other people in his group. Law enforcement should be able to question them also.

Since he is hiding and refuses to talk to law enforcement, it means that he lies and that he was killing people along with the Ukro- terrorists.

I don’t understand why we have to treat Islamo-terrorists differently from Ukro-terrorists and Judeo-terrorists? They all work for the same organizations.

I also beg to differ with Mr. Cristal, on the account of persistence of terror. What does it tell him when CIA Director John Brennan says that they knew about upcoming acts of terror in Paris?

If we see terrorism for what it is, the Western governments’ psy-ops to destabilize countries, then we will find the way to put an end to it.

In his interview to Anissa Naouai, Mr. Cristal talks about the comprehensive strategy of the fight with terrorism. He suggests that we have to go after the terrorists and physically kill them, we have to go after their leaders and physically kill them, we have to go after their money and bank accounts, and we have to go after the members of their families. He also says that we should only negotiate with terrorists to gain time to gather intelligence. There are no reasons why we would have any agreement with terrorists. This is what Israel does. Those are acceptable international practices.

This baldy claims to be a expert, maybe we should start following his recommendations?

The Essential Saker II: Civilizational Choices and Geopolitics / The Russian challenge to the hegemony of the AngloZionist Empire

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to get more info on formatting

(1) Leave the name field empty if you want to post as Anonymous. It's preferable that you choose a name so it becomes clear who said what. E-mail address is not mandatory either. The website automatically checks for spam. Please refer to our moderation policies for more details. We check to make sure that no comment is mistakenly marked as spam. This takes time and effort, so please be patient until your comment appears. Thanks.

(2) 10 replies to a comment are the maximum.

(3) Here are formating examples which you can use in your writing:
<b>bold text</b> results in bold text
<i>italic text</i> results in italic text
(You can also combine two formating tags with each other, for example to get bold-italic text.)
<em>emphasized text</em> results in emphasized text
<strong>strong text</strong> results in strong text
<q>a quote text</q> results in a quote text (quotation marks are added automatically)
<cite>a phrase or a block of text that needs to be cited</cite> results in:a phrase or a block of text that needs to be cited
<blockquote>a heavier version of quoting a block of text...</blockquote> results in:

a heavier version of quoting a block of text that can span several lines. Use these possibilities appropriately. They are meant to help you create and follow the discussions in a better way. They can assist in grasping the content value of a comment more quickly.

and last but not least:
<a href=''http://link-address.com''>Name of your link</a> results in Name of your link

(4)No need to use this special character in between paragraphs:&nbsp;You do not need it anymore. Just write as you like and your paragraphs will be separated.The "Live Preview" appears automatically when you start typing below the text area and it will show you how your comment will look like before you send it.

(5) If you now think that this is too confusing then just ignore the code above and write as you like.

Comment

Name:

E-mail:

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

64 Comments

“I don’t understand why we have to treat Islamo-terrorists differently from Ukro-terrorists and Judeo-terrorists? They all work for the same organizations.”

[…]

“If we see terrorism for what it is, the Western governments’ psy-ops to destabilize countries, then we will find the way to put an end to it.”

Attaboy Scott. Keep your eye on the prize.

I put the word ‘terrorist’ into a category alongside other words like ‘journalist’ or ‘historian.’ They are manufactured concepts, suitably amorphous and useful for thought control, in a thousands year long tradition of neurolinguistic programming.

We will never have justice until it becomes impossible for the gangster-priesthood to rule. We can disarm them by striking a tone similar to that which Putin used in this speech. It is precisely because of his habit of speaking truthfully that he will never be trusted by his opponents. Zionists will never abandon deceit. Their lies and obfuscations must be confronted relentlessly.

Unclear is the role of the Chinese authorities, (Hong Kong is a part of the Territory of the Chinese Communist State). Surely they do not bow to the Zionist, or French imperialists in their own country – China?

Israel/zionism/Jewish supremacists, dig enough and one will usually find the things orchestrating every fascist created problem at one level or another. These are the glue holding the zpc/nwo freakshow together.

I looked at the list of about 15-25 current political, economic, and other “leaders” of Ukraine who are all of Jewish background, and I couldn’t resist the echo of Marx’s aphorism which states:

History repeats itself first as tragedy (as in 1917 Bolshevik revolution) then as farce (as in 2013 Maydan Bandera revolution).

What a symmetry! In both events, Jewish participation was dominant, Jewish money not as much (see Anthony Sutton: Wall St and the Bolshevik revolution).

One more comment: although the book “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” has been shown to be forgery , and a composite plagiarism of different sources, I am beginning to be amazed at the accuracy of its prediction for the last 50 years.

Re: although the book “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” has been shown to be forgery…

Mr Henry Ford, founder of the Ford Motor Company, in an interview published in the New York World, 17 February 1921, said: ‘The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now’.

Whether they are a forgery is irrelevant — the entire history of the 20th century corresponds with frightening accuracy to the goals stated in these documents. Virtually everything planned for and predicted in the Protocols has come to pass.

Hold a newspaper in one hand and the Protocols in the other…. say no more…

Spiral, Henry Ford said of The Protocols that they might be a forgery, but they described accurately what he had encountered in business. My own theory is that The Protocols are a forgery, but a forgery by the Elders of Zion, who are real enough as we can see today, who desired a fake that spoke the truth, so that the truth could then be declared guilty and spurious by association. The same technique works with conspiracies like 9/11 when lurid stupidities are concocted ( eh holograms, passengers still alive, nukes used in the demolition etc)to confuse the public and denigrate the real and plausible theories by association with idiocy. One ‘conspiracy theory’ (ie faked Moon landings)is insane, so they ALL must be. No conspiracy ever occurred in history, don’t you know.

A Swiss court said in the 1930s the protocols certainly were a forgery. The problem is the protocols quoted a freemason book from the 19th century as a source, according to the court. Someone actually wrote what is in the protocols, at least part of them.

@the book “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” has been shown to be forgery.

Those who say so allege that it plagiarises Maurice Joly’s work entitled “Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu” of 1864.

Others say – and far more credibly in my opinion – the it was Joly himself who was the plagiarist of an earlier version of the Protocols, since the document is clearly a developing work in in progress and had probably existed in earlier forms long before Joly sought to satirise Napoleon III

@Joly himself who was the plagiarist of an earlier version of the Protocols

Completely lost from sight in this endless discussion is the 1868 novel Biarritz, by Hermann Ottomar Friedrich Goedsche (12 February 1815 – 8 November 1878), also known as his pseudonym Sir John Retcliffe.
In the chapter “At the Jewish Cemetery in Prague”, he described a secret rabbinical cabal, Council of Representatives of The Twelve Tribes of Israel which meets in the cemetery at midnight for one of their centennial meetings. They report on the progress of their long-term conspiracy to establish world domination. Among the methods to achieve this goal are the acquisition of landed property, the transformation of craftsmen into industrial workers, the infiltration into high public offices, the control of the press, etc. The chairman Levit expresses at the end of the meeting the desire to be the kings of the world in 100 years. This fictional “Rabbi’s Speech” was frequently quoted later as an authentic episode and invoked as a proof of the authenticity of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. In Nazi Germany the chapter was re-printed independently in many editions.”(Wikipedia). The chapter could at a time be found on the Internet. It disappeared recently.
It was the subject of the recent novel ‘The Prague Cemetery’ by Umberto Eco (who seemed to dedicate an inordinate amount of time to the ‘debunking’, in novels like ‘The Foucault Pendulum’, or various essays, of the “Protocols”).
Interesting remains the fact that all those who permitted, or facilitated the publication of the “Protocols” (assimilated to Haman!) have been exemplarily punished (The Tsar Nicholas II, Hitler, Anwar Sadat, Sadam Hussein, Gaddafi). The rage with which Bashar al-Assad is followed is due to the fact that he escaped, so far, the death sentence emitted against him (by the ‘Elders’, no doubt).

No “official” permanent inquisition.Like Spain and Portugal had for centuries. But at various times all the major branches of Christianity had something similar (even if for only short periods at a time). You might want to see about the Old Believers ,the Paulicians, and the Iconoclast movement in Orthodoxy to see that.

The State and Church worked together in all the religious persecutions. Even with the Inquisition,while it was the Church that tried the accused. They were then turned over to the “State” to handle the punishment .The Patriarch Nikon first attacked the Old Believers beliefs. And then enlisted the State to punish them. And the Iconoclast movement was solely an “inner” Orthodox religious struggle. At two separate times the Church and the State attempted jointly to enforce iconoclastic “reforms” on the Eastern Roman Empire . But to a great extent failed in the end. But not before much of the early Christian Orthodox art had been lost from the Worlds heritage.

In the case of Iconoclasm, it was the State which imposed the heresy on the Church, which, in fact, resisted until it was eliminated.
The Old Believers were prosecuted for schism and rebellion (Raskol).
Nevertheless, it was not an Inquisition Tribunal, as in the West, which condemned the heresy, but a Synod of the Church.

I would say it was more a joint effort. And of course the Old Believers were accused of that. There had to be a legal sounding charge to justify persecution. Its always the same with persecutions.So a Synod of Churchmen dependent totally on the State and Church leaders is somehow “different” to your thinking than a Tribunal set up by Church authorities. I would say the difference is cosmetic at best. Somehow, for some strange reason you seem to have a problem with accepting the fact that all the major religions at one time or another persecuted people that disagreed with them (especially maybe if it includes your own). But seriously history doesn’t support you in that thinking. And no amount of spinning and “if,and’s,and buts” help with that. The best way to look at that is its over now.

@for some strange reason you seem to have a problem with accepting the fact that all the major religions at one time or another persecuted people that disagreed with them

For not so strange reasons, you reason in the western-liberal frame of thought. The “organized religion”, aka “state Church” always “persecutes the “free-thinking” (who are supposed to be always on the right side). The Russian liberals and the Bolsheviks took up the “case” of the Old Believers as a weapon in their fight against the “official” Church as the stooge of the Tsar (not unlike today when the Church is the “thing” of Putin!).

In real life things are more nuanced. In actual fact, the reforms of Patriarch Nikon (which were not his initiative) were directed at correcting the decisions (many of them results of fanciful “innovations”) of the Stoglav Synod of 1551 which indeed were imposed by Tsar Ivan IV, straying from the practices of the Universal Church, leading to the really backward filetistic “russification” of the Church. These unilateral decisions shocked many of the Orthodox. The monks of Athos protested and the Russian monks there regarded the decisions of the synod as invalid.

The Great Moscow Synod (Большой Московский собор) was a Pan-Orthodox synod convened by Tsar Alexis of Russia in Moscow in April 1666. It was led by Patriarch Païsius of Alexandria, and attended by Patriarchs Macarios of Antioch and Nikon of Moscow, Metropolitans Athanasius of Iconium (representing the Ecumenical Patriarch), Ananias of Sinai (representing the Patriarch of Jerusalem), among many other bishops and fathers. Ironically (if you can say so) it deposed Patriarch Nikon!

Curiously, I also developed the theory of ‘ageing’ of religions, and see Islam about 700 years behind Christianity. Still in the dark ages, heading for the renaissance. However Christianity ‘split’ after the renaissance, while Islam split soon after its founding. In truth I expect another split coming up, which will be traumatic. (I suppose it could be argued that Christianity also split soon after its founding, into the Paul and James camps …. Paul’s “Christ” camp survived, while James’ “Jesus/Yeshua” camp withered and died).

Justice? Perhaps this would happen in the fictional Utopia.
In the real world there is an aboriginal community named Utopia. Piliger made a documentary on it.
In the sixties, the aboriginal people that had lived in the lucky country since the dream time where lucky enough to become Australian citizens. But they have no government/power that be to look after their interests. the people that perished at Odessa had nobody to look after their interests.
The people on MH17 – Dutch, Malaysians, Australians where all sacrificed by their governments for the US empire.
The Australian Utopia is the real world and the concept of justice seems to belong in the fictional Utopia.

I watched Anissa’s interview myself this weekend. It left me with the uneasy feeling that Russia is dealing with Israel, not out of a position of strength; but out of weakness. Your background report on this fellow, and your connection of this type of fellow to Odessa, leads me to wonder why this man was interviewed by Russia Today at all.

What hooks have the Jews set in Putin and in Russia through which they can exert such pressure and have such influence?

It is true that a large proportion of early Bolsheviks were jews and many atrocities were committed both in the early days but also under Stalin (who was a Georgian).

But life was not rosy during the days of the Tsarist Empire. A significant proportion of the population was illiterate and lived under extreme poverty both in the countryside and in the cities.

Nevertheless, the military, economic, social and scientific achievements of the Soviet Union were very significant and provided its citizens with a decent standard of living (e.g high quality free education, free health care, social welfare, housing, elimination of unemployment and job security etc).

The USSR exists no more but the Jews are still in control in post-soviet Russia as they have managed by various (legal and illegal) methods to take control of a significant part of the soviet state enterprises during the Yeltsin privatisation years. Almost all oligarchs are jewish.

The dissolution of USSR caused extreme hardship to the Russian people with mass unemployment, widespread poverty, falling birthrates and population decline, disease, rampant alcoholism, prostitution, and drug addiction etc. The dissolution of USSR was not caused by any serious defect of the state planned economy, but because of the decision of state elites to get rid of the socialist institutions and to enrich themselves by privatising the state owned economy. The economic collapse happened during the transition to capitalism. The economy was stable and growing during the socialist years. And the Soviet people were against a transition to capitalism.

There were many countries that had a hard life then. But life in Russia was particularly bad ,in comparison to Europe during that time.Even though by 1913 things were better. The last famine in Russia under the old regime was in the 1890’s. And 500,000 people died. Something unheard of in the Europe of that time:

“In 1891 a particularly dry autumn had delayed the planting of the fields. That winter temperatures fell to -31 degrees Celsius, but very little snow fell therefore the seedlings were totally unprotected from the frost. When the Volga river flooded the lack of snow caused the water to freeze, killing more seedlings as well as the fodder used to feed the horses. Those seedlings that weren’t killed by frost were blown away along with the topsoil in an uncommonly windy spring. The summer started as early as April and proved to be a long dry one. The city of Orenburg for example had no rain for over 100 days. Forests, horses, crops and peasants all began to die, and by the end of 1892 about half a million people were dead, mostly from cholera epidemics triggered by the famine.”

“Weather alone cannot be blamed as there was enough grain in Russia to feed the starving areas. The peasants used medieval technology like wooden ploughs and sickles. They rarely had modern fertilizers or machinery (the Petrovsky academy in Moscow was Russia’s only agricultural school). Russia’s primitive railways were not up to redistributing grain. The affected area was a stronghold of communal land distribution so that households had no incentive to improve the land or mechanize, but every incentive to produce as many children as possible (Russia had Europe’s highest birth rate. The main blame was laid at the government, which was discredited by the famine. It refused to use that word: golod, they called it a poor harvest, neurozhai, and stopped the papers reporting on it.[1] The main reason the blame fell on the government was that grain exports were not banned till mid-August and merchants had a month’s warning so they could quickly export their reserves. Minister of Finance Ivan Vyshnegradsky even opposed this late ban.[2] He was seen as the main cause of the disaster as it was his policy to raise consumer taxes to force peasants to sell more grain.[3] Even Russia’s capitalists realized the industrialization drive had been too hard on the peasants. The government also contributed to the famine indirectly by conscripting peasant sons, sending taxmen to seize livestock when grain ran out, and implementing a system of redemption payments as compensation to landlords who had lost their serfs.”

There were many plus to the Russian Empire. What it needed most was modernization and reform. But we mustn’t be blind to the problems they suffered. The Revolution in 1917 was ultimately successful because,just as with the French Revolution, the people lost patience with the old regime. And WWI was a catalyst that released the built up anger of the past.So that when the Bolsheviks (no matter who they were) called for “Peace,Bread,and Land” the masses sided with them.

The masses sided with the Bolsheviks?…
If you can call masses the hordes of
deserters who went AWOL with their
rifles, when the Army disintegrated
in the wake of the first (February)
‘revolution’ in 1917.

It’s true, however, that the last Tsar –
kept by his entourage on the Louis XVI’s
course, when it came to the privileges
of the land-owning class, found himself
helpless in the face of the Judo-communist
terror made possible by the chaos of war,
as well as the Jew Rothschild’s financing
of the Bolsheviks.

As to the mass murder in a building-
cum-crematorium in Odessa, whenever
a person or a nation is down, the kosher
hyenas are guaranteed to appear out of
nowhere to make a feast of your carcass.

And they will always label their victims as
‘terrorists’, ‘extremists’, ‘reactionaries’,
‘fascists’ or even ‘communists’… And they
will always deny any holocaust perpetrated
by them and their accomplices.

Some major news! As of this morning YPG west has made contact with IS.. It looks like they will fully evict moderate green terrorists from north of Aleppo. This also means not only have the SAA cut off the terrorist supply lines but the YPG has cut them up further north as well. And YPG east inside Aleppo town has attacked moderate terrorist positions as well but has barely moved. Trying to unite both of them still a long way off..

SDF/#YPG has vowed to avenge Turkey indiscriminate shelling #Rojava #Kurds by deadly striking Turkish Syrian proxies at the moment
#SDF/#YPG is negotiating with FSA rebels to take Mare without a fight, which allows them to get to #ISIS frontline

A truly stunning piece Scott. Thank you. It is a model of the considered manner in which Judaic complicity – not to say motivating dominance – in the travails of Russian/Western history from at least the mid-19th century onwards, needs to be presented.

However, I must also echo Dennis James Leary at 5:05 am above on yesterday’s Glaziev interview. The only light in the gloom that piece otherwise induces in me, is Glaziev’s profession of optimism at the end of it – optimism which I am bound to say I struggle to share. Short of another cataclysm (of WWIII proportions), ‘The Money Power’ will continue to call the shots and, as in the previous two, remains well placed orchestrate it and to continue to dominate whatever order (should humanity survive it) that may emerge from it.

Nicely and expertly put together by a knowledgeable, intelligent and talented wordsmith – but it is NOT – I repeat NOT the least stunning.
For those of us, who see and not just look, it nicely fits into the flow of “things as they represent themselves” instead of “as they are presented to us”.

Well it might not be in the least ‘stunning’ to you Cognoscenti – but frankly, to say it like you do gives the appearance of smugness. So why not share a little of this hidden inside knowledge of yours instead of boasting about it – Mr Anonymous?

had connection issues, not certain if my comment made it through, so am sending it again –

Just look at the history of Turkey during the collapse of the Ottoman Empire at the turn of the 1900’s till say 5 years after the end of WW1. The Committee of Union and Progress, a grouping with a strong Jewish presence, started taking over Turkey. During this time period the Armenian massacres, the first genocide of the century, started.

After lots of chaos, including the Greek invasion of Turkey post WW1, the nationalist Mustafa Kemal took over and promptly hanged most of the Committee of Union and Progress, unconcerned about the outcry from international “finance” in New York, Paris and Berlin, and banking house’s of the Rothschild’s in Vienna and London.

So it seems some people enjoy sticking their noses into other people’s business, they started with the collapse of the Ottoman empire first, done lots of killing, and got smacked on their noses by Mustafa for their effort. Then they stuck their noses into the collapse of the Tsarist empire, done lots of killing (as Bolshevik’s), and got smacked on their noses by Stalin for their effort.

Come to think of it, our Jewish brother’s seem to circle around collapsing empires / countries like vultures. At the collapse of the USSR they were there as oligarchs. At the collapse of Ukraine they are there as oligarchs. At the collapse of the British empire, pre-ww1, they probably took over then as oligarchs (Rothchild’s). Their presence at the end of the Ottoman and Tsarist empires is mentioned above. So that’s the reason they are circling so much around the AngloAmericanista empire now, its collapsing. They are in fact circling around the AngloAmericanista empire so much that it looks like its the AngloZionist empire :-)

THE SUNDAY WIRE broadcasta LIVE, as host Patrick Henningsen returns this week with another very special show, covering the top news stories internationally. In the first hour we’ll look at the latest regarding the FBI arrest of Cliven Bundy in Portland, the GOP presidential blood bath, the political fall-out from the death of US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and the breaking situation in Syria. In the second hour we’re joined by special guest, political analyst and journalist, Andrew Korybko to analyze and discuss the Europe’s ever-developing ‘Migrant Crisis’. In the third hour we’ll tackle more geopolitical issues and news stories.
Strap yourselves in and lower the blast shield – this is your brave new world..

And let’s not forget what the Roman Empire did in the end — demolished the central temple (of magical thinking) and practically plowed salt into the earth the solve the ‘problem’. Basically following on from the Egyptians and Persians.

With a biological-cultural ‘identity’ linked only to the ‘X’ chromosome it pretty much does not matter what happens to the “Y” — and that, along with new born infant genital mutilation, pretty much self-selects an evolutionary path of hyper existential anxiety (at least in the “Y” side of the economy) and a bias towards domination/slave relationships and away from peace and harmony. This comment is about cultural system’s bias (that would crucify a good man to save the tribal system) and not specific individuals who may (or may not) survive and transcend the local conditions.

My condolences for the ancestors you lost, but this Jewish conspiracy theory is nearly as silly as the Islamic conspiracy/pseudo-numerological theory of this dorky Christal dude you’re so aptly mocking.

Communism /= Judaism. That’s the basic problem. Communism is an ideology with a strong underpinning; agree with it or disagree with it (For the record, I broadly agree with Marx’s critique of capitalism but strongly disagree with the centralist approach of Communism as a response), it can stand on its own feet. It is foolish to underestimate ideas in the history of political struggle, not to mention class and the structure of society. All that you discount, in favour of . . . what? History as driven by a small cabal with no real structural role, some of whose most prominent members were drastically at odds with each other? Consider that Lenin and (any given major Rothschild) would have cheerfully murdered each other if given the chance.

The notion of the October Revolution as a “colour revolution” is a nonsense. Partly because it’s a poor idea to talk about events of the past as if they were echoes of the present. But mainly because if the term “colour revolution” is going to mean a thing, it refers to the creation and use by foreign powers of local catspaws to overthrow otherwise not particularly revolution-worthy government, to install instead governments which can be counted on to serve the ends of those foreign powers. OK, so in 1917 Germany would have wanted to weaken Russia–but nobody wanted Communists to gain control of any country, and that would certainly include the establishment, financier Jews. And the government of Russia at that time sucked. Sorry, but it did; it was nasty and also inefficient, ineffective and out of touch. There were plenty of people with plenty of reasons to want big changes, and the secret police, while unpleasant, were insufficient to hold together a status quo that had too little sticking it together. What happened was a real revolution, and largely home grown, not a “colour revolution”.

And Lenin’s bunch ended up on top of the result because they were tough, organized, and had an ideology strong enough that it had a significant following. Many of the results were nasty. That’s history for you. When one group loses power and another group gains it, bad shit happens, especially when the groups involved are large and have longstanding grievances. It’s true whether it’s an ethnic clash, a religious one, or as in this case mostly class based. One hardly requires conspiracy theories about Jews to explain that.

Jews have been prominent in 20th century history–but they’ve been prominent on all sides of most political and intellectual struggles. It shouldn’t be surprising; 20th century history has been mainly a history driven by urban, Western, educated people. Jews are disproportionately all three–with a long, strong tradition of education and a history of often being forbidden to own land. Medieval history was driven largely by rural uneducated elites–knights and landed nobles. Jews were barely a footnote through much of that time for exactly the same reasons they’ve tended to be prominent more recently. Meanwhile, in the modern era anywhere you find history being driven by rural folk, you don’t find a lot of Jews. Not a lot of Jews among the Zapatistas, as far as I know, nor were Jews particularly big in the Chinese Communist revolution.

What’s that got to do with anything I was saying? Sure, the US has since somewhere in the 50s or 60s been so hand in glove with Israel that it will let them get away with almost anything.
What has that to do with the notion of secret Jewish conspiracies in 1917 before Israel even existed or seemed particularly likely ever to exist? Israel is also not equal to world Jewry, hard though the Israelis work to convince everyone, including worldwide Jews, that it is.

(Incidentally, people brandish that incident as though the biggest possible offence that the US wouldn’t normally ever forgive was the death of US servicemen. Shyeah right. The US elites don’t give a shit about servicemen, although they certainly make great excuses for shock and horror if they die under the right circumstances at the hands of the right people. That’s why US wars are so often started with false flag operations. If people really wanted to show how much the US lets Israel get away with, they should find something like, letting an Israeli firm get away with stealing a contract from Lockheed Martin)

Thanks Scott. The best article I’ve seen on here in a long time. I often wonder why the Russian Government is so friendly towards Israel. It seems like they’re naive about who their real enemy is and think it’s just “the West” who are the problem. Of course if you look at who in “the West” is leading the anti-Russian campaign it becomes pretty clear they’re not “Westerners”. But as long as the Zionist regime doesn’t take an openly hostile stance the Russians are gullible enough to fall for it. That way any Russian retaliation is directed against “the West” and not Israel. It’s hard to believe Putin doesn’t know what’s really going on, given his dealings with the oligarchs and how obvious it has all become. Could he really be that naive?

” He suggests that we have to go after the terrorists and physically kill them, we have to go after their leaders and physically kill them, we have to go after their money and bank accounts, and we have to go after the members of their families. He also says that we should only negotiate with terrorists to gain time to gather intelligence. There are no reasons why we would have any agreement with terrorists. This is what Israel does.”

I would agree with most of that. Except for attacking innocent family members. Instead of fighting terrorism ,that would be becoming a terrorist. And your are right there. That is exactly what Israel does. Though I would disagree with them many times on “who” is the terrorist and who isn’t.

Chabad-Lubavitch. Very, very bad news. The most powerful doomsday sect the world has ever seen. The psychopaths psychopaths. The darkest shade of black of Zionism. The golden bullet that killed Judaism. Until Jerusalem burns they will froth at the mouth.

@Scott: Re: The Pope and Kiril. This is totally off topic, but there are numerous photo’s of them sitting and discussing ????. Behind them is clearly a skull and crossbones. In your opinion is this significant?

Patriarch Krill and Pope Frances are sitting in front of a traditional Orthodox cross. The design of rocks at the bottom of the cross represents Mount Golgotha.

What you call “skull and bones” hidden in a cave under the earth is ‘the skull of Adam’ (for by pious tradition it is said that Christ was crucified at precisely the same place where Adam was buried), identified with the letters: “Г А” (in Slavonic: глава Адамла). We are thus reminded that Adam our forefather lost Paradise through the tree from which he wrongly partook; Christ is the new Adam, bringing us Salvation and Paradise through the tree of the Cross.

Even considering that one find Israeli tourists almost all the time, everywhere ( they travel a lot, almost as much as the Basques ) this occurs in about tourist sites, and Odessa, just the 2 May 2014 could not be classified as tourist spot.

Health professionals, as a rule, I attest, almost never got medical supplies with us, not even gloves, even in the severe case of health professional Virgo autumn equinox, well known for its aseptic manias. In this, health professionals we comply faithfully with the Spanish saying, “home of the blacksmith, wooden knife.” Not having even sometimes a simple paracetamol at home when we suddenly develops a fever, as happened to me yesterday.
When we travel to a certainly exotic and / or underdeveloped country, or very high places, then yes, we usually take a well-equipped first aid kit and even a small kit for surgery, but even in this case, when we are visiting a city, we leave it in the hotel to avoid unnecessary weight.

So no, I do not buy that this chicken, Siboni, was carrying everything needed for first aid by chance.

Cristal – any relation to Bill (Kristol)? – sounds exactly like the kind of stink-tank wonkery so beloved of Anglo-Zionism/neo-cons.

They invariably have the kind of ‘expertise’ that has never stands up to the scrutiny of who, what, where, how and why. Expensive obscurantists who live only to propagandize the agendas of their paymasters.

Uncle Bob
Your previous comment , taken from Wikipedia??? I recently learned never to trust Wikipedia. “….primitive railways….” As reported in Encyclopaedia Britannica, in this time of Alexander III, during the years of his reign, and ending in 1894, the railway system was advanced from a total of 14,900 miles to 24,000 miles. Seems to me that those new rails would not be so “primitive.” And, on recently reading the whole history of Russia from the same source, I have to come to the conclusion, that although Russia was backward compared to much of Europe, it was not nearly as backward as is so often claimed by the Russia haters. Guess it depends on who writes the story, and the desired impression.
Regarding Wiki-true story.
Recently I went there to research a court case in Canada. Found a detailed article, but found the descriptive seeming explanatory bias most objectionable. So, I complained, and received an immediate answer, asking for the article. I found it again and supplied it. Problem was that I know it was the “same” article about the same issue, but except for four lines, which were verbatim, the rest of the whole article had been re written and prettied up. So, I complained about that, and right away got a reply insisting the article’s last revision was back in Dec. 19, 2015.
So, first the article on the court case was filled with political rubbish, then somebody changed the article, then they denied to me, not so stupid, that it had not been changed. I told WIKI to get lost.
Remember how Wiki is constructed-by you-me-anyone, maybe with an agenda. Don’t trust it. Never again.

It is true that Wikipedia isn’t a perfect source for information. But can you name one that is,I can’t. What I like about Wikipedia is that they source where they take their information from. Then if you doubt it you can research those sources (and I recommend that). At least that is true of their historical postings. I don’t usually check anything else there. You are right about the writers sometimes (it depends on who. And if they have a motive,posting disinformation.) misusing it. But that is where the “sources checking” comes in.

As to your concerns over the railroad issue. Do you know how much smaller Germany was than Russia in those days. I’m not sure,but I’d say around 30 or more times smaller in size. Yet in 1902 (right after the time frame you mention),little Germany had 31,000 km of railroad (http://members.kos.net/sdgagnon/mila.html). And Mexico by 1910, had 15,360 miles (24,719.5 km) in a very underdeveloped country(Fred Wilbur Powell, the Railroads of Mexico (1921) . While by 1860 on the eve of the US civil war (long before Alexander III), the US had 29,000 miles (47,000 km) of railroad track.In a country only a bit over a third the size of Imperial Russia.( United States Census Bureau. Report on the Agencies of Transportation in the United States at Tenth Census 1880. pp. 308–9.) So I’d say that that point was pretty accurate. Coming from Wikipedia or not.

Nearly all the wartime documentation on Generalplan Ost was deliberately destroyed shortly before Germany’s defeat in May 1945.[6][7] Thus, no copies of the plan have ever been found after the war among the documents in German archives.

So they made it mostly up by deduction and bias.. It was a very secret plan so it was easier to destroy. Now I agree with a lot of things you say.. Even here.. The only difference would be in the severity of things on some things because of our bias on west v/s east and west/east Christianity….
If a few years ago you had told me, the US education system is full of crap I would not have believed it, but now that I am paying attention, IT IS full of crap, utter nonsense just made up. What was even funnier was degryson or who ever the idiots who downgraded pluto was say we don’t know everything and we might not be able to prove it, but that don’t mean the science is invalid.. It had to do with something important and for someone like that to come out and say we had to accept his explanation because he was going to be right. Because I had another explanation for it.. So this was hard science that seemed not so hard after all.. Same about the gas chambers, the ashes that cant be found at the camps.. When so much is fake.. I begin to doubt everything that makes such emphasis to just create an event that may of may not have existed…

You know that time travelling bell developed by the Nazi’s.. has as much proof of its existence..

For whatever your reasons ,you chose to ignore the ways they know about it. But that doesn’t prevent me. All my life (long before there was anything called Wikipedia) I’ve heard about the plan’s existence. And the nazis themselves, that helped with it, confirmed it. The most telling was that they do have a report from a nazi commenting on what was in it a wartime document. ( Robert Gellately. Revieved works: Vom Generalplan Ost zum Generalsiedlungsplan by Czeslaw Madajczyk. Der “Generalplan Ost.” Hauptlinien der nationalsozialistischen Planungs- und Vernichtungspolitik by Mechtild Rössler; Sabine Schleiermacher. Central European History, Vol. 29, No. 2 (1996), pp. 270–274). Interesting that you would totally believe that our enemies today would plot against Russia,and yet you have doubts that the nazis did. Thinking that, frankly astounds me.

What’s not in this video is a statement of fact that they collected an enormous amount of documents to substantiate his statement. Essentially, President Putin told to the representatives of the European Jewish Congress that it was Russia that might start the tribunal process on the account of the holocaust of Russians by the first Soviet government that was 80 to 85% Jewish, the rest were ethnic Ukrainians, militants from the Baltics, and also Georgians, and Polish militants.

Considering, that 90% of my family had perished during the Red Terror, and considering that my parents have never received any compensation for the death of their relatives neither from Jewish organizations, nor from Germany, I am in full support of such undertaking.

Scott, what about the Holocaust of the Jews by the Romanovs and the Russian Empire from 1795 and 1917? The attempt to strangle the Russian Empire’s Jewish community that came under Russia’s domination after Russia illegally annexed parts of Poland? Did your family have a hand in it ? Were any of the members of the Romanov family, Russian gentry, military, or imperial government apparatus brought to account and tried for the of the imperial Russia’s crimes against its Jewish subjects? Did a single Jewish family who were the victims of the pogroms ever receive any monetary compensation or an apology from the Tsarist government?

You people became so accustomed to killing Jews that it almost began to look like you just did it for sport!

Would you support a tribunal against imperial Russia for its treatment of the Jews as well, or were the “old Russians” the Romanovs some inherently superior beings who had the right to murder whoever they pleased?

Until that tribunal (which is long overdue and should come first ) happens, only then should you support and insist on the other one.

Sitemap

Saker Android App

An Android App has been developed by one of our supporters. It is available for download and install by clicking on the Google Play Store Badge above.

All the original content published on this blog is licensed by Saker Analytics, LLC under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 4.0 International license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0). For permission to re-publish or otherwise use non-original or non-licensed content, please consult the respective source of the content.