Cs need to be prioritized on a finer level as it
will currently take 5-years to complete all the Cs. Consider rank ordering

Should there be more than one process?

Replacement equipment and new equipment will be
prioritized through two different process

Luciw stated that ETS has a campuswide process
that refreshes computers and equipment (replacement equipment) according to
age. ETS has Measure C staff to work on these projects

Sherman explained the rational for changing the
computer refresh time from 4-years to 5-years (financial limits)

The Campus Technology Prioritization Committee
reviews and prioritizes replacement equipment (computers and smart classrooms).
Currently, they do not review or prioritize new equipment requests.

The team agreed the Campus Technology Prioritization
Committee should continue to prioritize replacement equipment (computers/smart
classrooms).

Prioritizing new technology projects

The request form would include details such as:

Goal of project

What software / hardware to purchase

Identify the project sponsor

How many people will it affect or benefit?

Has budget been allocated?

The consensus of the team was to continue working on a
process that would roughly follow the following procedure:

Interested parties would fill out a request form. Their
manager/dean must sign the request. Perhaps make a place on the form for
manager feedback? ETS would meet with the individual to discuss the project and
to place it on the draft ETS master prioritization list. This list would then
be presented to the De Anza campus prioritization authority (TTF?) for
prioritization at a campus level.

This item (Proposed Process for Requesting/Prioritizing New
Technology Projects) will be brought back for further review and discussion at
the next Technology Task Force meeting.

Lilly asked the team to consider the merits of requesting College
Council make a resolution authorizing Technology Task Force to act as the
prioritization committee for new technology requests. This item will also be
brought back for further review and discussion at the next Technology Task
Force meeting.

The team approved of forwarding a recommendation to College
Council to accept and approve ETS’s proposal that “projects and project phases
that have been started cannot be stopped midstream.”

3) Smart Classroom
Current Upgrade Schedule

Luciw distributed the Smart classroom update.

4) Next Phase of
Wireless Deployment

Luciw handed out the latest wireless update. Giang (DASB)
provided the research results from his DASB survey. Luciw would take this
feedback into consideration. The team thanked Giang for his work on this item.