Chairman Devin Nunes calls in to Fox News for an interview with Neil Cavuto to discuss the HPSCI report on Russian active measures (pdf also below):

.

fyi, late last night I decided to reset all assumptions about the ‘small group’ and go back to the beginning of the Lisa Page and Peter Strzok texts and re-read every single message that has been released. *Note* it takes, at a very minimum, six hours to chronologically review every document containing their messages. I’m writing up a summary of that review today.

Yep, best advice I ever got was the best way to avoid a crazy person is to avoid them at all costs, do not engage or feed their urges.
Unfortunately that means they will focus their obsession on another person.

I am anxiously awaiting your analysis Sundance!
I (sheepishly) admit when I read the texts I get lost—too many initials and titles I lose track of. And then trying to overlap the texts with the headlines and events and dates…man, I just can’t fathom how you keep it and tie it all together. BUT THANK YOU!!

After reading the summary of findings table, there is a major finding that is missing from this report.
The Russians worked strictly on social media which by definition is nothing more than a collection of unverified statements, allegations and opinions. While the “formal” broadcast news is supposed be unbiased verifiable information. Its up to the individual consumer of both media forms to sort out their own conclusions. For the US election in 2016, there was no difference between the quality of information broadcast by both forms of media, therefore the Russians had little if any impact. Plus, if the democrats and media persist in their beliefs of Russian influence, they are admitting that the “formal” news outlets were either influenced or agents of the Russians.

Very interesting. Last paragraph especially. Any lawyers care to comment? From Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch:

“Our venerable and regrettably now deceased Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia ruled in the landmark case of United States v. Williams, 112 S. Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L. Ed. 2d 352 (1992), that the grand jury under our Constitution does not belong to any of the three branches of government, but instead to We the People. As a result, the citizens are empowered to empanel grand juries, indict, try, convict and mete out sentences for those accused of crimes.”

“A few years ago, as the prosecutor and a Florida lawyer, I empaneled a citizens’ grand jury in Ocala, Florida, a very conservative area of the Sunshine State. With jurors randomly picked from voter rolls as is done by federal and state courts, I advised the accused — in this case Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama — of the proceeding and offered to allow them to testify, and then presented evidence to the citizens’ grand jury when they did not appear.”

“As a result, they were indicted for alleged crimes concerning their manifest harm to national security over Iran which not coincidentally involved leaking classified information about our cyber-attack on Iranian nuclear reactors. This classified information was illegally leaked to bolster Obama’s and Clinton’s political fortunes.”

“A trial then ensued, presided over by a neutral judge picked from the Ocala community, and Clinton and Obama were convicted of crimes. At the time, we did not seek to enforce the convictions — but times are different today!”

“But now, with the alleged criminality of Special Counsel Mueller, who has been illegally leaking grand jury information concerning his so-called Russian collusion investigation to fatally damage the president, his family and colleagues and thus the country regardless of any later criminal charges and/or impeachment proceedings — which are from what we now know apparently unwarranted — times are different!”

“It’s time that We the People rise up and not be afraid — as our Founding Fathers were not scared to take bold action — to do what needs to be legally done to restore what was intended by them to be a new nation of equal justice for all.”

ANY Strzok/Page texts about their affair, would not be released, just like any texts about their kids or family. They are not relevant.

Too me whether they had an affair or not, is only relevant to give insight as to their character, or where their loyalties may lie.

If this investigation was done right the white hats should have wire tapped Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Yates, McCabe at the least. That would take guts, my guess is the white hats were too afraid of the political fallout if they did a T3. There sure appears to be enough probable cause.

That said if, the justice department DOES THEIR EFFING JOB this is very doable!

I cannot understand why they have not indicted McCabe yet. With McCabe suing Trump, I seriously doubt McCabe has cooperated. If McCabe is looking at prison he will be the first domino, followed by Comey. And the rest of the rats will be throwing each other under the bus.

Comey told Brett that Comey has met with Clapper and Brennan. That tells me they are conspiring, and if there was a wire up on any one of them, THIS WOULD BE OVER!

I read a post I can’t find my way back to that talked about the Millions Trump and Sessions have spent on getting gitmo ready and the 1,800 sealed indictments that are sealed but ready, with a photo of Sessions smiling.

Poor Never-Trumper Cavuto couldn’t stand hearing the truth from Nunes. He (Nunes) kept trying to discuss the Russian ties to the Clinton campaign (and the Trump tower mtg). But all Cavuto could talk about were the nothingburger meetings various Trump campaign members had with Russians (who were ALL approached by the Russians – not the other way around). i.e. Hillary had her KGB toadies doing her dirty work.

In inquiries on Benghazi and Russia and beyond, the California congressman has displayed a deep mistrust of the expert consensus on reality — a disposition that has helped him make friends in the current White House.

Can someone help me please. I do not understand the contents of Comey memos. They dont serve anything one way or the other. I assume they were to setup POTUS but they dont appear to. What am i missing?

I believe when he made the notes he was playing both sides. He could leak what ever he wanted, to serve what ever self serving interest he had. He could count on it being “classified” by him, he originated the document, so he thought the entire memo would never be released, only what he, or one of his stooges leaked.

Comey indicates that he kept notes of his conversations with the President as head of the FBI. These records of conversations are confidential by law. Then Comey indicated that he felt very uncomfortable with Trump, and alleged that he was asked to ignore prosecution of Flynn, which is the obstruction of justice allegation. The notes leak, and the SC is empaneled to investigate the charge.

Now that the docs are released, we see there is no there there at all. No uncomfortableness. No obstruction. Nothing that would require a SC. We now know the notes were leaked intentionally to Comey’s friend, who is found to have been a secret GSE posing as academia.

Now we wait for the next step. Why does the SC continue to exist? Did Comey purgure himself? What to do with Rosenstein and the DOJ?

Someone at ZH is copying SD’s visual wire diagram style of connecting the people.
Some interesting nuggets, including DiFi’s former staffer Dan Jones, emerging as the newest cutout, paid by Soros and 8 Silicon Valley oligarchs, in order to channel information from Russian oligarchs to Senators Warner and Burr, on the Senate Intel Committee.

As you are weeding, pls consider – in amongst the Strzock-Page txt msgs, there are at least 2 txts that appear, imo, that they are looking for other jobs. One is from sometime Dec 2016, the other is 6 May 2017 iirc, which refers to D, which is Comey. Priestap is DD, afaik.

Were they already discussing finding a position with a Special Counsel? Comey was still D on 6 May 2017. They were talking of 1.1 mil vs 500K. ???

They were either successful, if talking of jobs w/a Special Counsel (which is unlikely imo), or unsuccessful, at which point they moved on to Special Counsel option.
So much to read, so little time…
How do you do it and weed? Is it possible to convert a .pdf to mp3 w/o using current speech-to-txt converters (awful things)? Still looking for the genius who codes that conversion.