Meta

Purpose The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Routine (WHODAS) 2. and match of the hypothesized structure using confirmatory element analysis (CFA). Responsiveness was evaluated in another randomly selected sample by screening a priori formulated hypotheses. Results Nine hundred seventy individuals were included in the study. Reproducibility and responsiveness were evaluated in 53 and 104 individuals, respectively. The ICC for the WHODAS 2.0 domains ranged from 0.63 to 0.84 and was 0.87 for total score. Cronbachs Mouse monoclonal to GST alpha for domains ranged from 0.75 to 0.94 and was 0.93 for total score. For construct validity, 6 LY294002 of 12 expected correlations were confirmed and CFA did not achieve satisfactory match indices. For responsiveness, 3 of 8 hypotheses were confirmed. Summary The Norwegian version of WHODAS 2.0 showed moderate to satisfactory reliability and moderate validity in rehabilitation patients. However, the present study indicated possible limitations in terms of responsiveness. (6 items), (5 items), (4 items), (5 items), (8 items) and (8 items) [22]. can be divided into activities relating to household (4 items) and activities relating to work/study (4 items). All questions relate to problems experienced during the earlier 28?days (30?days in the original version). The scores assigned to each item are recoded and summed in each LY294002 domain with a range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst), using complex rating (SPSS algorithm is available from WHO) [21]. For people operating or studying, all 36 items are determined to a total score; normally, 4 items are omitted. An algorithm enables calculation of website score of and total score regardless of whether the 4 items relating to work/study are solved. SF-36 version 1 is a common patient-reported health survey instrument [23]. The SF-36 comprises 36 questions (items) along eight domains of health: mental health (5 items), vitality (4 items), bodily pain (2 items), general health (5 items), social functioning (2 items), physical functioning (10 items), role limitation related to physical problems (4 items) and part limitation related to emotional problems (3 items). An additional item captures changes in general health over the past year. Twenty questions relate to experiences during the earlier 28?days. The response scores for each domain are added, followed by a conversion to a score between 0 and 100 with higher scores indicating better health [23]. The measurement properties of the instrument have been tested extensively [24]. Statistical analysis Multiple imputations for missing items were applied according to the WHODAS 2.0 manual [22]. If the rate of missing items was >50?% in WHODAS 2.0 domains or in the total score, data were excluded. Number of imputation units?=?5. Missing items in SF-36 were managed according to the SF-36 manual [23]. Feasibility was assessed by exploring LY294002 missing items of WHODAS 2.0, and a critical rate of 10?% missing items was used [17]. Scores on WHODAS 2.0 and SF-36 were quantified from the per cent of patients rating, respectively, the lowest possible or highest possible score in the independent domains and in the total score. Floor effect was defined if more than 15?% acquired the lowest possible score (best for WHODAS 2.0; worst for SF-36), ceiling effect if more than 15?% acquired highest possible score (worst for WHODAS 2.0; best for SF-36) [25]. For reproducibility, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), two-way mixed with complete agreement, were determined for website scores and total score for individuals reporting no switch in health status. An ICC?>?0.70 was regarded as acceptable [25]. Smallest detectable switch (SDC) for domains and total score was estimated [25]. Internal regularity was estimated by Cronbachs alpha LY294002 coefficient. A coefficient between 0.70 and 0.95 is considered satisfactory [25]. Create validity was explored by screening hypotheses formulated in advance, comparing WHODAS 2.0 domains to SF-36 domains. Expected correlations between all domains of WHODAS 2.0 and SF-36 domains were defined by.