This game is basically made out of references, and poop jokes. Besides that it is a great RPG game too, and I love it how it's not made into 3D, but remained the same style.
I loved how the most important character's houses have a closet dedicated to all the things they gained, and especially liked the fantasy theme.

I finished playing Year Walk. I would have likde it to be longer, this universe just draw me in. All the Swedish folklore was so new and enchanting, and with the macabre parts it gave the game a pretty great mood. The puzzles were just perfectly challangeing. What's your opinion about it?

I had the opportunity to try out the Elder Scrolls Online Beta this weekend. It was amazing, I was always a fan of Elder Scrolls games since I first played Morrowind, and although I am not a huge fan of MMO, this will be a great game.

I have read most reviews about the new Thief game, and I got so angry. Why do they give so low scores, (6.9 on IGN) when they give crap games like Battlefield score of 8.5?
Thief is a great game, it needs patience to play and it's not just a dumb shooter. It's like every reviewer is only into shooter games. And I think that's very wrong and unfair. In my opinion there should be reviewers specifically for shooter games, and separately for adventure games, stealth games, etc. especially for a site this big. Just because you play games, doesn't mean you understand every aspect of the games. Reviewers job should judge games objective, because their review might be the difference for someone who tries to decide whether to buy the game or not, and this can't happen when someone gives a game low score just because he doesn't prefer that genre. If a game deserves a score at least 8, it is this game.