Zechariah – Biblical Studieshttps://biblicalstudies.org.uk/blog
Making Biblical Scholarship AccessibleThu, 24 May 2018 07:45:38 +0000en-GBhourly173556694Commentary on Zechariah by W.H. Lowehttps://biblicalstudies.org.uk/blog/commentary-on-zechariah-lowe/
https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/blog/commentary-on-zechariah-lowe/#respondMon, 15 Dec 2014 13:40:07 +0000http://biblicalstudies.org.uk/blog/?p=1794The following biblical commentary is now available for free download in PDF: William Henry Lowe [1848-1947], The Hebrew Student’s Commentary on Zechariah. London: MacMillian & Co., 1882. Hbk. pp.155. Commentary on Zechariah Prolegomena to Chapters I.-VIII. Personal to the Prophet Of the personal history of the Prophet Zechariah hardly anything is recorded. He styles himself ... Read more

Commentary on Zechariah

Prolegomena to Chapters I.-VIII.

Personal to the Prophet

Of the personal history of the Prophet Zechariah hardly anything is recorded. He styles himself “Zechariah, son of Berechiah, son of Iddo, the prophet,” which certainly implies that he was the grandson of Iddo. But in Ezra v. 1, vi. 14 he is spoken of as “son of Iddo.” This, however, presents no difficulty, for similarly Jehu is mentioned as son of Jehoshaphat son of Nimshi (2 Kings ix. 14), while(ver. 20) he is called merely son of Nimshi. The father of Zechariah, and the father of Jehu, seem to have been (to use an illustration from modern times) somewhat in the position of Abraham Mendelssohn, they could both boast of being the father and the son of a man of reputation. Knobel’s supposition, then, that “son of Berechiah” (Zech. i. 1, 7) is an interpolation from Is. viii. 2, where Zechariah son of Jeberechiah is mentioned, is unnecessary. In Ezra v. 1, 2 “Zechariah son of lddo” is mentioned as prophesying in conjunction with “Haggai the prophet,” and being instrumental in bringing about the resumption of the work of rebuilding the Temple. We know nothing further for certain about him, except that he prophesied up to the month of Cislev in the 4th year of Darius. Something may, however, be deduced from circumstantial evidence.

Among the Priests and Levites who came up with Zerubbabel is mentioned “Iddo” (Neh. xii. 4), as one of heads of the priestly families (rashe haccohenim) in the days of Jeshua (see p. 32) the High Priest.Again in the days of Joiakim, the son of Jeshua (the High Priest), a Zechariah son of Iddo is mentioned (ver. 10, 12, 16) as one of the heads of families (rashe ha’abhoth), and that evidently among the Priests. From these facts it is deduced by many (and not unreasonably), that Zechariah (like Jeremiah and Ezekiel) was a priest as well as a prophet:and that (supposing the Iddo of Neh. xii. 4, 16 to be the same person that is mentioned in Zech. i. 1), while Zechariah began his ministry during the High-priesthood of Joshua, he was head of his family in the days of Joiakim the son of Joshua. Thus Zechariah’s father, probably died early and never became the head of his family, and Zechariah a young man at the time of the return from the Captivity.

]]>https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/blog/commentary-on-zechariah-lowe/feed/01794H.L. Ellison on the People of God from the Exile to the Messiahhttps://biblicalstudies.org.uk/blog/h-l-ellison-on-the-people-of-god-from-the-exile-to-the-messiah/
https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/blog/h-l-ellison-on-the-people-of-god-from-the-exile-to-the-messiah/#respondWed, 19 Oct 2011 18:09:00 +0000http://biblicalstudies.org.uk/blog/?p=197Thanks to the kind permission of Paternoster Publishing, the following book is now available on-line in PDF: H.L. Ellison, From Babylon to Bethlehem. The People of God from the Exile to the Messiah. Exeter: The Paternoster Press, Ltd., 1976. Pbk. ISBN: 0853641900. pp.136.