SUBSCRIBE:

Nationwide arrests of activists, critics multiply in China

Share

The Chinese government has undertaken a nationwide crackdown on dissent in an apparent campaign against perceived challenges to one-party rule, Human Rights Watch said on August 30, 2013. Since February 2013 the government has arbitrarily detained at least 55 activists, taken into custody critics and online opinion leaders, and increased controls on social media, online expression, and public activism, rolling back the hard-won space China's civil society has gained in recent years.

The crackdown is unfolding as China campaigns to be elected to the United Nations Human Rights Council, the UN's preeminent human rights body, in November 2013, and prepares for the review of its human rights record before the council in October 2013.

"The Chinese government has embarked on a repressive drive at home that attacks the very freedoms that Human Rights Council members are supposed to protect," said Sophie Richardson, China director. "Every arrest of a peaceful activist further undermines the Chinese government's standing at home and abroad."

Seventeen of those arrested in recent months had participated in the New Citizens' Movement, a peaceful civil rights platform that rejects authoritarianism and promotes freedom, justice, equality, and the rule of law. The New Citizens' Movement organizes a range of activities, including a nationwide campaign that advocates for the disclosure of assets of public officials as a way to curb corruption, and monthly gatherings over meals for activists around the country to exchange ideas and build solidarity.

On August 2, 2013, the State Prosecution approved the formal http://www.ifex.org/china/2013/07/18/xu_zhiyong/" target="_blank">arrest of Xu Zhiyong, the most prominent activist detained so far and considered the intellectual force behind the New Citizens' Movement. Xu has been held since July 16 for "gathering crowds to disturb public order," even though he has been under house arrest since April. If convicted, Xu faces up to five years in prison. Xu, 40, is a law lecturer at Beijing University of Post and Telecommunications, and was once distinguished by the state broadcaster CCTV as one of the "top ten rule of law people" in China. In 2009 he was forced to disband the legal aid center he helped set up, the Open Constitution Initiative, after police detained him and a co-worker for tax evasion.

"Xu Zhiyong is one of the most important activists behind the birth of China's 'rights-defense' movement that emerged around 2003," Richardson said. "While Xu's cautious approach has helped keep him out of jail for the past 10 years, his recent arrest indicates that even safer strategies won't spare activists from severe consequences."

The 38 other activists recently detained were taken into custody for organizing and participating in other public, collective actions not directly related to the New Citizens Movement, including protests. Many were charged with crimes such as "gathering crowds to disturb order" and "creating disturbances" and of those, 16 have been released, some on bail. But a number of the activists detained have been charged with the more serious crimes of "inciting subversion" and "subversion." Inciting subversion carries up to 15 years in prison, while subversion can result in life imprisonment.

Among those detained is prominent activist Guo Feixiong. Guo, a 47-year-old Guangzhou-based lawyer, who has been detained since August 8 for "gathering crowds to disturb public order." Police have denied Guo access to lawyers on the grounds that his case involves national security. Beyond his right to legal counsel, Guo's lawyers are concerned that denying him access to lawyers makes him more likely to be subjected to torture. Guo was tortured during his previous imprisonment between 2006 and 2011.

Government efforts to curb criticisms of the Chinese Communist Party have widened to individual critical voices on the Internet. Since August, the government has taken into custody hundreds of Internet users accused of "spreading rumors" online. Most have been released, but some remain detained under criminal charges. The campaign has targeted influential online opinion leaders, or what the state media call the "big Vs" (V for "verified users").

According to state media, the State Internet Information Office held a meeting on August 10 with some of these bloggers, including liberal commentator Xue Manzi (also known as Charles Xue), "achieving a consensus" that these opinion leaders would not breach "seven bottom lines," including China's "socialist system," the country's "national interests," and "public order." On August 23, Xue, 60, who has 12 million followers on Sina weibo, one of China's main social media networks similar to Twitter, was detained for "soliciting a prostitute," an administrative offense under Chinese law. State-owned media harshly criticized Xue while explicitly warning other "big Vs" against becoming the "loudspeakers" for rumors. Since May, the government has closed down more than 100 "illegal" news web portals, citizen-run websites that have provided important channels for citizens to expose government misconduct.

The crackdown on dissent reflects the general hardline shift taken by the Xi Jinping leadership in recent months. It contrasts sharply with Xi's rhetoric at the beginning of his presidency in March, when he promised to "uphold the constitution and the rule of law" and "always listen to the voice of the people."

In April, the office of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party issued an internal directive stressing that the party must eliminate "seven subversive currents" in China today, including those who advocate for "Western constitutional democracy," "universal values" such as human rights, civil society, and "Western press values." In June, the Supreme People's Procuratorate issued a notice demanding that prosecutors at all levels "combat the crimes of endangering national security" by "resolutely combating crimes such as illegal assemblies, the gathering of crowds to disturb social and public order, and others, which aim to subvert state power." Reflecting an apparent departure from a rule of law approach, the notice stressed that legal organs should "unify social, political, and legal results" in their work, rather than solely base their decisions on the law.

China is currently seeking a seat at the UN Human Rights Council, an intergovernmental body charged with addressing human rights violations and promoting respect for human rights. In a pledge submitted in connection with its candidacy, the Chinese government said it "respects the principle of universality of human rights," and that it "has made unremitting efforts for the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms of the Chinese people." The next elections for the council are slated for November.

Human Rights Watch called on the Chinese government to drop all charges against individuals for peacefully exercising their rights to freedom of expression and assembly, and to ensure that they are not subject to torture or other ill-treatment in detention.

"The authorities' abuse of the law to go after critics is counter-productive, as it closes one of the only effective channels for airing grievances about the government," Richardson said. "The government's only 'unremitting efforts' on display these days are the denial of universal rights."

More from China

Dedicated internet users continued to employ circumvention technology and other creative tactics to defy and bypass restrictions on free expression. The government responded by increasing efforts to block circumvention tools, including through innovative cyberattacks and intimidation of software developers.

The 100-page report shows that Tibetan refugee communities in Nepal are now facing a de facto ban on political protests, sharp restrictions on public activities promoting Tibetan culture and religion, and routine abuses by Nepali security forces.

IFJ's report documents the continued deterioration of press freedoms in Mainland China, as well as Hong Kong and Macau. It takes its title in direct response to Chinese authorities adopting more repressive measures in 2013 reminiscent of the Mao era four decades ago, including direct censorship, Internet surveillance, abuse of legal process, harassment and intimidation, and televised confessions of journalists and bloggers without trial.

Digital Rights:

More from Digital Rights

Internet freedom has declined for the sixth consecutive year, with more governments than ever before targeting social media and communication apps as a means of halting the rapid dissemination of information, particularly during anti-government protests.

This publication presents the findings of the media development assessment in Mongolia that began in 2012 to determine the state of the media in the country. The assessment was based on the UNESCO/IPDC Media Development Indicators (MDIs), an internationally recognized analytical tool used to provide detailed overviews of national media landscapes and related media development priorities.

The report features present FoE practices on internet in Nepal and analyses existing policy, laws and constitution affecting the practice of freedom of expression. It seeks to advance the debate on this topic, thereby augmenting digital rights to make democracy's pillars more sustainable and more functional.

The report is a frank assessment of the recent regime of online censorship and mass surveillance against a backdrop of longstanding, serious abuses of the judicial process and attacks on freedom of expression by Turkish authorities.

The report surveys the rocky landscape for media and public discourse since the ruling military junta lifted the curtain on the southeast Asian nation in 2012 after five decades of isolation from the modern world.

The Cross Community Working Party on ICANN’s Corporate and Social Responsibility to Respect Human Rights (CCWP-HR) prepared this paper for presentation and discussion at ICANN54 in Dublin in October 2015. This paper is intended to build on and complement the previous reports published by the Council of Europe and ARTICLE 19 on ICANN’s responsibility to respect human rights.

The Pakistani government has significantly expanded its communication interception activities. This Privacy International report covers the intelligence services plan to capture all IP-traffic in Pakistan and other initiatives, pointing to gaps in the laws governing surveillance.

What is the correlation between the online and offline behaviour of Iranian citizens and the likelihood of their arrest in Iran today? Answering this question is the main focus of this new ARTICLE 19 report.

The need to regulate the transfer of surveillance technologies that pose a risk to human rights has been largely recognised by EU institutions and some EU member states. It is no longer a question of if the EU should do more in this area, but how.

Cambodian Internet users overwhelmingly see the country’s Internet as increasingly becoming more accommodating of free expression but remain concerned about the effects of recently proposed government actions related to Internet surveillance and controls, according to the results of a study by CCIM, which surveyed almost 1,000 Cambodian Internet users from 22 provinces.

IFEX publishes original and member-produced free expression news and reports. Some member content has been edited by IFEX. We invite you to contact [email protected] to request permission to reproduce or republish in whole or in part content from this site.