FACT: Pro
Apollo Nutters persistently state there are no scientists in the world who
refute the Apollo Moon landings. That is complete and utter balderdash,
(which is to be expected of PAN's), because there are more scientists who
support the hoax theory, than those who refute it. To start off with here
is a list of scientists who support the Moon landing as being genuine.
Prof. Michael Brant Shermer, American.
Prof. Steven I. Dutch, American. Prof. Brian Cox, British. Prof. Harald
Lesch, German. A grand total of 4.

Now here is a list of scientists who
support the Moon landing as a hoax. Prof. James M. McCanney, American. Prof. Luke Sargent, American. Prof.
André Balogh, British. Prof. Colin Rourke, British.Prof. Krassimir
Ivanov Ivandjiiski, Russian. Prof. Takahiko Soejima, Japanese. Prof. Li
Zifeng, Chinese. Prof. Federico Martín Maglio, Argentinian. That makes a
grand total of 9. So the Moon hoax supporters are way out in front on 69%
with Moon landing supporters way behind on 31%.

FACT:
The current Airfix plastic kit model of the Saturn V rocket, has
no mention whatsoever on the box that Apollo went to
the Moon, in fact the word "Moon" does not appear anywhere on the box. It
merely states that the Saturn V launched the Apollo capsule into space,
(low earth orbit, which is correct). Evidently Airfix realize that Apollo
did not go to the Moon, otherwise there would be a reference to it
somewhere on the box containing the model. As many would say "The truth is
as plastic as the model".

FACT:
Knight Newspapers, (one of the two groups that later merged to form
Knight-Ridder Inc.) polled 1,721 US residents one year
after the first (fake) Moon landing. It found that
more than 30% of respondents were suspicious of
NASA's trips to the Moon. Author: So what is the percentage over 48
years later?

FACT: The
fake Apollo videos and still footage photos show a very dry dusty surface
many inches deep. If there is no wind on the Moon, (apart from the wind
which constantly blew the flag), then why is there no dust on top of the
rocks and boulders? There should be if there is no wind to blow away the
dust.

FACT:
Despite numerous videos being taken on the alleged 17th mission, (fake of
course), not one of those movies show Schmitt at "Tracy's Rock", and yet
the still photo is the most popular of the whole mission. Did Cernan
decide not to use the movie camera at "Tracy's Rock", or is this yet
another NASA blunder they overlooked. Yes you've guessed right it is the
latter of the two.

FACT:
Despite numerous videos being taken on the Moon's surface, not one of them
contains any frames showing planet Earth in the void of space. I would
think that is a very poor planning on the part of the astronauts, although
we already know why this is so.

FACT:
Neil Armstrong suffered with mental illness in his later years. A direct
result of him putting his name forward as the foundation stone for the
biggest lie in history. OR it could be that he became paranoid by the
overwhelming number of web sites, exposing him as a liar, and
why was he buried at sea after his
death?

FACT: Rumor
has it that Apollo 12 astronaut Pete Conrad was going public about the
fake Moon landings on the 30th anniversary back in July 1999. He was
killed in a motorcycle accident one week before the 30th
anniversary.

FACT: It
takes the space shuttle 66 hours to reach the International Space Station
which is a mere 200 miles above Earth. NASA claim Apollo 13 was 55 hours
into its duration from lift off when it encountered a problem at a
distance of 200,000 miles from Earth.

FACT:
In 1998, after looking at the NASASCAM website, world celebrity Uri Geller
said that NASA's Apollo Moon pictures have been crudely
faked, and asks WHY? Uri however, is friendly with Apollo 14
astronaut Edgar Mitchell, so we may ask WHY does he not ask Mitchell
himself why the pictures were faked?

FACT:
President Lyndon Johnson made certain Apollo files
classified, with a declassification date of 2026.
This is so those involved in the Apollo scam would be long dead and gone,
and no one alive to blame. One need not wait 9 years for the truth behind
Apollo, as the truth is already well known.

FACT:
In the early 60s NASA/CIA officials, realizing that a manned Moon landing
was totally impossible before 1970, met in secret behind closed doors. It
was at that meeting they agreed upon a decision to fake Apollo 11, in the
hope they would get to the Moon later on, and then substitute the earlier faked pictures with genuine Moon
pictures. The reality is they never succeeded with
any mission.

FACT: Arthur
C. Clarke referred to Apollo 11 as "A Hole in History". Historian A.J.P.
Taylor referred to it as "The biggest non event of his
lifetime".

FACT: NASA
had not perfected the lunar landing craft in time for Apollo 11. In 2017
they are still trying to get a rocket to land and take off again, over 48
years after Apollo was supposed to have done just
that.

FACT: Film
footage taken inside the capsule of ALL Apollo missions, shows a light
blue haze, and curvature of Earth through capsule window, when they were
supposedly half way to the Moon, and in the blackness of space. This
proves that capsule was only in Earth orbit.

FACT: Moon
pictures on NASA's web sites are fake, with backdrop scenes pasted. The
pictures reveal a black line penciled in where background meets daylight
sky, which was blacked out completely.

FACT: The LM
used on latter missions, was the same spec as the first mission, IE, no
modifications. It would have therefore been impossible to carry the rover
vehicle to the Moon in the same confined LM, even if it collapsed into a
more compact form.

FACT:
The lunar rover had inflatable tires which would have exploded if
pre-inflated, and there was no air on the Moon to inflate them. Pro Apollo
Nutters claim the rover had solid wire mesh tires. Yes the rover in the
museum had these fitted in the mid 70s when they realized pneumatic tires
could not have functioned on the Moon. NASA have had over 48 years in
which to clear up the plainly obvious mistakes within the Apollo program.
Each time someone brings up a query NASA correct it and say nothing, ie,
they cannot say why the anomaly was there in the first place. Anyway I
have pictures of the rover supposedly on the Moon and it has the
same tires and tire valves as
the one they used at KSC. In other words it is the
same one. Early close up pictures of the rover on
Internet have changed since the blunder was exposed
on this web site.

FACT: It
would have been impossible to have a water cooled space suit on the Moon,
when outside temperature was already at boiling point of water, there
would be nowhere for the heat to dissipate.

FACT: The LM
was suspended from a huge traverse crane based at Langley Research Center,
Hampton, Virginia, and was gently lowered at the same time it traversed
over a mock Moon surface created beneath it. Check picture on
APOLLO REALITY site, and Channel
4 video "As it Happened" .

FACT:
Trainee astronauts were also suspended from this huge traverse crane in a
horizontal position to simulate reduced gravity. Check picture on
APOLLO REALITY site with the NASA
web site picture of Harrison Schmitt tripping up. The unusual high
backward leg swing is identical in both pictures.

FACT:
Film footage allegedly taken by Apollo 8 as it supposedly circled the
Moon, is the same film used for the Apollo 11
mission, except that film is reversed and run backwards, look for "tadpole
like" mountain range. What NASA did was to film the mock lunar surface at
LRC, traveling in one direction, then reverse camera, and film surface
traveling in opposite direction, as shown in videos.

FACT: Film
footage showing Apollo missions allegedly circling the Moon, was taken by
a rail mounted camera which slowly moved toward a rotating plaster paris
model of the Moon.

FACT: James
Lovell was reading from a prewritten script in the simulator when he did
the voice over for the above film, and described the Moon as being
"essentially gray, no color, looks like plaster of paris". It was indeed
plaster of paris he was referring to, hence the smirk on face of Michael
Collins after his remark.

FACT: Anyone
who believes the Moon landings must be "essentially
green".

FACT:
Michael J. Tuttle who composed the fake Moon pictures, used mountain
background scenes from the astronaut training sessions in differing
places, to paste on the genuine simulation pictures. He also digitally
composed the 360 degree panoramic shots of fake Moon landing sites for use
by NASA. His URL speaks for itself. The majority of NASA's fake Moon
landing pictures were taken/composed in the mid 90s, and
not in the late 60s as many are led to believe. This was
because suspicion was aroused at the time regarding the limited number of
photos available. NASA had to do something rapidly because of the onset of
the Internet. Problem is they faked too many photographs, which did not
fit in with the time frame spent on Moon. Further info can be found on the
APOLLO FAKE
webpage

FACT: The
Saturn V rocket had shed 97% of its weight upon reaching Earth orbit. The
remaining 3% was the space capsule placed in Earth
orbit.

FACT: Earth
is 250,000 miles from the Moon, yet reflected sunlight from its surface is
strong enough to illuminate the darkness on planet Earth. Anyone hovering
above surface of Moon would be blinded by the high intensity light
reflected back.

FACT:
In the mid 60s, Alan Shepherd was removed from all
space missions due to vertigo and menieres disease. No one in such a poor
state of health would be assigned to such a dangerous and complex mission
in space. He was not even on the Apollo 14 mission, which in itself was
only in Earth orbit.

FACT:
Alleged Moon rock is basalt rock found here on Earth, (or as the Dutch
found out, petrified wood). NASA were manufacturing simulated Moon rock
over 3 years before Apollo 11. If it is genuine Moon rock, then it was
brought back by a scoop and return probe.

FACT: The
monitored radio/data signals were either transmitted from Earth and
reflected back by bouncing the signal off the Moon, or were transmitted
via a leased channel. If such a valuable source of monitoring equipment
was left on Moon, then it would be in use today, and not shut down in the
70s.

FACT: In a
TV interview with journalist Sheena McDonald back in 1994, the NASA
Administrator, Dan Goldin, (alias Dan Dare), openly admitted that mankind
cannot venture beyond Earth orbit, until they can overcome the dangers of
cosmic radiation. He managed to say this without any mention of the Apollo
missions 26 years before, which supposedly went 250,000 miles outside
Earth orbit.

FACT:
Neil Armstrong had no mementos or photographs
whatsoever from his alleged Moon mission, however he had plenty from his
test pilot days. There are no photographs of Armstrong supposedly on the
Moon, because Armstrong, knowing the saga was fake, refused NASA
permission.

FACT: In
1969 computer chips had not been invented. The maximum computer memory was
256k, and this was housed in a large air conditioned building. In 2017 a
top of the range computer requires at least 64 Mb of memory to run a
simulated Moon landing, and that does not include the memory required to
take off again once landed. The computer on board Apollo 11 had 32k
memory.

FACT: When
Apollo astronauts were not in space, they were manning mission control
communication for other Apollo missions, this was to limit the number of
persons in the know. There were in fact two communication links to every
Apollo mission. First was launch control who dealt with communication at
lift off, and re-entry, however once in Earth orbit communication was
handed over to the limited few astronauts manning mission control. Check
it yourself on film coverage released at the time. Collins, Duke, Aldrin,
Young, Borman, Armstrong, Lovell, Shepherd, Schmitt, Cernan etc, are all
there on various missions. Lovell himself admitted that there were two
communication links to the astronauts.

FACT: It
would have been impossible for the astronauts to get from the Lunar Module
to the conical space capsule, (Command Module), as shown in drawings, as
this section was occupied by the 3 large reentry parachutes, which ejected
from the conical end.

FACT: In
2017 NASA does not have the technology to land men on the Moon, and return
them safely. It may be possible in the future, but such a feat is still
many, many years away.

FACT: Buzz
Aldrin believes he has suffered brain damage as a result of his trip to
the Moon. He knows darned well that he never went anywhere near the Moon,
and so could not have suffered brain damage in the way he alleges. Aldrin
was the only Apollo astronaut who went public, and talked about the Moon
landings during the 70s and 80s. The guilt, remorse, and stumbling over
awkward questions put to him by the media, have put an intolerable strain
on him. His psychological damage is the result of keeping it bottled up
for over 48 years, instead of getting it off his mind. In Aldrin's book
"Return to Earth", he makes a remark that all 6 of them have been made to
look fools. Make of this what you will.

FACT: Deadly
radiation in space beyond the magnetosphere, makes human space travel
impossible. Scientists have not yet found a way to protect astronauts from
this deadly radiation.

APOLLO Q & A

Your feedback questions
answered.

________________________________________________________________

Question:
What
about Moon rock brought back by astronauts, its proof the landings took
place?

Answer: No it is not, and this is the
most common tactic used by NASA and PAN's, but proves nothing.
NASA were manufacturing simulated Moon rock, long before the
Apollo missions, this is proven in an abstract published in 1966, 3 years
before Apollo 11. This simulated Moon rock is reconstructed
from basalt, and meteorite samples discovered in Antarctica. It is
simulated Moon rock that is dispatched to universities around the globe as
being the real thing. These simulated Moon rocks are, of course, totally
different to any rocks found on Earth, and they were meant to be that way.
This is why geologists claim they cannot be found any where elsewhere on
Earth. No of course not, because they are manufactured by NASA to be
totally different to Earth borne rocks. NASA manufacture the simulated
Moon rock and Moon dust so cheaply they do not even charge for it, other
than transportation costs.

Looks
as though NASA have shot themselves in the foot with this mid 1960s
picture.

Question: If NASA faked the Moon missions, why fake six, when they
only needed to fake it once?

Answer:
If NASA had just done one (fake) Moon
landing, it certainly would have looked suspicious. NASA needed to
convince the media that they could get to the Moon and back no problem,
and so faked another six Moon missions, with different astronauts on each
mission to achieve their goal. Another reason is because if NASA had faked
just one mission, they realized that if the lie ever became exposed,
(which it has), then all the shame and guilt would have rested solely on
Armstrong and Aldrin. By involving many more astronauts in the deceit, it
enabled those astronauts to share the guilt evenly. Incidentally many
already accuse Armstrong of lies and deceit, and yet he was not the first
to scam the media, as there were six others before him. The first
astronauts to deceive the public were Borman, Lovell and Anders in Apollo
8, followed by Cernan, Young and Stafford in Apollo 10. Neither of these
missions went anywhere near the Moon as they describe. Apollo 9 was in
Earth orbit, and its a pity that NASA don't own up to the fact that all
other Apollo missions were only in Earth orbit.

Question: Why don't they point the Hubbell telescope at Moon to
view the artifacts left behind?

Answer:
Hubbell is owned and operated by NASA, the ones responsible for
faking in the first place, so there is no chance there. In order to cover
up for NASA, their paid informers, (PAN's like Phil Plait and Jay
Windley), claim that the Hubbell cannot resolve down to view the landing
sites, but how much resolution do they need? Hubbell will in fact resolve
down to 50 meters on the Moon's surface, which is more than enough to view
the artifacts supposedly left behind. NASA do in fact have very high
resolution pictures of the Moon, but do not inform the media because the
first thing people would ask is to see the artifacts left behind from
Apollo, and, as to be expected there is nothing
there.

Question: What about the hammer and feather experiment, how could
they achieve that in Earths gravity?

Answer: This is another ridiculous
claim made by PAN's, but again, proves nothing. The film is shot in poor
lighting, as well as being a very poor quality black and white fuzzy film,
and as the experiment is performed so far away from the camera, it can
easily be fabricated. If you examine the footage carefully, you will see
the fine wire, (possibly thin nylon fishing line), recoil back, so this
proves the object was lowered by line. I would like to point out that
magicians like David Copperfield have performed far greater
feats, (optical illusions), within a few feet of a live
audience. One of his stunts involved himself being cut in half
by a rotating saw blade, then the two sections of his body were moved to
opposite ends of the stage. If PAN's believe the hammer and feather
experiment was real, do they also believe that David Copperfield was
sliced in two by a rotating saw blade?

Question: Why do prominent astronomers like Sir Bernard Lovell and
Sir Patrick Moore support the Moon landings if they were
faked?

Answer:
Scientists and astronomers around the
globe know full well that the Moon missions were faked, but rely on NASA
to gain access to the vital data beamed back to Earth from satellites in
outer space. They cannot slag off NASA otherwise NASA would deprive them
of this essential information, which they so much
require.

Question: What about the laser reflector left on the Moon by
astronauts, from which they can calculate the Moon's distance from
Earth?

Answer: In 1946 scientists in the USA
managed to bounce a radio signal off the Moon's surface, and were able to
calculate the precise distance of the Moon by the reflected radio signal.
In the early 1960s, the scientists realized they could perform the
experiment more efficiently, and accurately by using a high powered pulsed
laser beam. In this scenario the laser beam is reflected back to Earth in
the same way as Sunlight is reflected off the Moon's surface towards
Earth. On May 9 1962, (over 7 years before
Apollo 11 was supposed to have landed on the Moon), a high powered pulsed
ruby laser was successfully aimed at the Moon, and reflected back off the
Moon's surface to provide an accurate measurement of the precise distance
from Earth to Moon, without any reflector being on
the Moon's surface. There is no laser reflector on
the Moon, and never has been. NASA are using the same method today as what
they were using back in 1962, albeit with a much more powerful laser.
Incidentally NASA plan to use an even higher power laser on Mars to
calculate distance. Have astronauts placed a reflector on Mars to bounce
the beam back?

Question: Why did the USA fake the Moon landings, was it to "get
one up" on the then Soviet Union?

Answer:
No they weren't done to fool the
Russians, does anyone believe the Russians would be so stupid to fall for
a con like that? Russia were more advanced than the USA in space
technology back then, and still are today. They knew at the time of
Kennedy's speech that it was impossible for manned space travel to the
Moon and back. Incidentally the day after the fake Apollo 11 Moon landing,
NASA administrator, Thomas Paine, was heard telling Intelligence officer
Bob Seaman's that the Chinese were saying the USA faked the mission by
bouncing radio communication signals off the Moon. If the Chinese, (who
were not into space technology in 1969), knew the landing was fake, do you
not think that Russia would know?

NASA
was under orders from the CIA to fake the Moon landings as a propaganda
tool for US government. The Apollo farce was an extension of the MKULTRA
mind control experiments in the 50s and 60s. This is proven by naming the
program “Project Apollo”. Further info on this can be found on the
APOLLO TRUTH
page.

The
landings were faked purely and simply to instill pride in the USA, and
convince Western civilization that the USA were better in space than the
Soviet Union, when in reality they were way behind the Soviets in
everything to do with space technology. Because of this, the Western media
had totally lost faith in the USA, and the USA could not be seen as the
'weaker link' at such a crucial period in time. There was no
Space Race as claimed by NASA, who incidentally coined
the phase. Russia had no intention whatsoever of sending men to the Moon
because they knew it was impossible.

Question: Was Richard Nixon behind the fake Moon
landings?

Answer:
Although Nixon was president at the time
of the Apollo missions, he was not directly responsible, even though he
knew, or should have known, they were fake. The planning and preparation
into faking the Moon missions began way back in the early 60s, and hence
Lyndon B Johnson was the president with the most inside knowledge of the
Project Apollo program. LBJ classified many Apollo documents until
2026.

Question: What about the vast number of people involved in Apollo,
wouldn't someone have spoken out?

Answer:
Pans claim there were half a million
people involved in the Apollo program, but that includes all the humble
engineers working on machine parts in many companies around the globe. So
if someone is making a part in some engineering factory in Seattle, and
his boss tells him it is for the Apollo spacecraft, is that engineer proof
the landings took place? No of course it's not proof, and even if that
engineer knew they never made it to the Moon, he would still brag to his
friends that he made a part that went to the Moon just to make him feel
proud in some way or other. Parts for the Apollo program were made
at many different factories around the globe. For example the laser
reflector supposedly left on the Moon was manufactured in France. NASA
collected the unit from the French company, and that was the last they saw
of it. It's probably stashed away in some archive at Langley, but one
things for certain it's not on the Moon. Are those French engineers proof
they landed on the Moon? No of course not, as very few, (probably less
than 200 people), were actually involved in bringing the whole lot
together, so as to minimize what was actually taking place. No need for
any of them to speak out because (A) They are 100% patriotic to the USA,
and would say nothing that would go against America, even if it were true.
(B) They do not need millions of dollars to safeguard their future, as
they have already received substantial amounts from NASA just to "keep
mum". Read comments from people who worked on the Apollo program in the
APOLLO FEEDBACK
section.

Question: Why didn't Russia cry foul over the fake Moon
missions?

Answer: Yet another tactic used by
PAN's that the landings were genuine. However they are basing this fact on
how Russia poked fun at failures within the USA space industry in the
early 60s, during the Kennedy/Kruschev period. Kruschev was always poking
fun at their failures, and referred to Alan Shepard's 15 minute space
flight as a mere 'flea jump' to what they (Russia) had done. However when
Kruschev stepped down in 1964, the new Soviet leader, Brezhnev, never
poked fun at the USA, and Russia just got on with their own business. What
many people don't know however is that the Moon landing was portrayed as
being fake in both Russian newspapers, and many other newspapers around
the globe at the time, however most of these stories were suppressed from
the Western media. Remember Russia was a very secretive country back in
1969. Russia could have blabbed to the world that the Moon landings were
fake, and probably would have done if Kruschev were in power, however
Western countries would simply say they were jealous because the USA had
beaten them to it. Russia however had a far better plan in mind, and in
order to understand how it would work, one needs to understand the way in
which Communist ideology worked back in the 1960s. At that time the Soviet
Union assumed Communism would go on forever, and they never anticipated
that it would collapse 20 years later, after all it had been going for
over 50 years. Their answer to NASA's fake Moon missions was to
sit back and say nothing, safe in the knowledge that
in the not too distant future, Western civilization would eventually "wake
up", (although PAN's appear to remain in a deep coma), and discover that
the USA government had lied to them. This would then turn many people
against the USA government as they, (the Western media), would feel
cheated, made to look fools, and would no longer be able to trust them.
This is exactly what the then Soviet Union expected to
happen, ie, for the Western media to turn against an authority,
that they could no longer trust. If Russia were still a Communist state,
its leaders would be laughing their socks off now at the way the USA
government was being slagged off by its own citizens. You only have
to look at comments on the APOLLO
FEEDBACK page to realize how many are turning against the
USA government for spreading untrue propaganda, when in reality it was
100% fake.