If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

There is no other word for these efforts to thwart a woman's legal choice to have an abortion than governmental harassment. Lawyers should get involved and make it expensive and painful for legislators to keep trying these workarounds to Roe.

Judges can award damages paid from the state treasuries, and the plaintiffs can donate that money to Planned Parenthood. Sweet.

Roe vs Wade is unconstitutional and is only the law of the land because of idiots who do not support the Constitution. Why is it that women can't make the decision to close their legs instead of making a life into a bloody, pureed mess? Why do I have to continually try and defend MY RIGHT to not pay for somebody else s poor decisions? If I have to pay for it, aren't I entitled to "hit it?"

Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.C. S. LewisDo not ever say that the desire to "do good" by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. (Are you listening Barry)?:mad:Ayn Rand

Roe vs Wade is unconstitutional and is only the law of the land because of idiots who do not support the Constitution. Why is it that women can't make the decision to close their legs instead of making a life into a bloody, pureed mess? Why do I have to continually try and defend MY RIGHT to not pay for somebody else s poor decisions? If I have to pay for it, aren't I entitled to "hit it?"

The Supreme Court is packed with idiots when it disagrees with you, and geniuses when it agrees.

Originally Posted by AmPat

Why is it that women can't make the decision to close their legs ....

I don't know, ask the girls the next time you are in a bordello in Bangkok.

Originally Posted by AmPat

If I have to pay for it, aren't I entitled to "hit it?"

Since you tell me that you make less than a postal worker, I'm guessing that you don't even pay for your own healthcare, much less anyone else's. I saw nothing in the article specifying that these rules only apply to abortions for indigent women. But you go ahead and "hit" any of them that will agree, or which you can afford. OK? OK!

The Supreme Court is packed with idiots when it disagrees with you, and geniuses when it agrees.

In all honesty (look it up, it is an unfamiliar word to you), the SCJ's are only idiots when I know more about the Constitution and our government than they do.

I don't know, ask the girls the next time you are in a bordello in Bangkok.

That is closer to your lifestyle than mine but whatever bends you over.

Since you tell me that you make less than a postal worker, I'm guessing that you don't even pay for your own healthcare, much less anyone else's. I saw nothing in the article specifying that these rules only apply to abortions for indigent women. But you go ahead and "hit" any of them that will agree, or which you can afford. OK? OK!

Where did I "tell you I made less than a postal worker?" As for your completely stupid yet expected comment. I PAY FOR MY HEALTH CARE. Clear enough Skippy?

The internet bravery of you liberals is an amazing thing. Strange how when confronted by a real man you piss your panties.

Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.C. S. LewisDo not ever say that the desire to "do good" by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. (Are you listening Barry)?:mad:Ayn Rand

There is no other word for these efforts to thwart a woman's legal choice to have an abortion than governmental harassment. Lawyers should get involved and make it expensive and painful for legislators to keep trying these workarounds to Roe.

Judges can award damages paid from the state treasuries, and the plaintiffs can donate that money to Planned Parenthood. Sweet.

Once again, if we treat abortion the way that we treat all other surgeries, then informed consent ought to be the standard. It's not harassment to tell someone that they might die if they have an epidural during childbirth, but it is harassment to show a woman who is considering an abortion the factual information about the development of the fetus? What planet does that make sense on?

Why do you object to the presentation of information that might just make a woman change her mind if she knew the facts?

Originally Posted by Novaheart

You mean the power of the legislature to crawl inside your vagina and make medical decisions for you?

The legislature isn't crawling anywhere (although they've certainly shoved the tax code up a few places where it shouldn't be), and they aren't making any medical decisions for anyone, they are only mandating that the decision be informed by the facts. Why are you demanding the perpetuation of a woman's ignorance on matters that may prove more traumatic if she finds them out after the fact?

There is no other word for these efforts to thwart a woman's legal choice to have an abortion than governmental harassment. Lawyers should get involved and make it expensive and painful for legislators to keep trying these workarounds to Roe.

Judges can award damages paid from the state treasuries, and the plaintiffs can donate that money to Planned Parenthood. Sweet.