B757 is a narrow-body and B767 is a wide-body. They also have completely different engine variants.

LB, you are smarter than this. There is more to commonality than a fuselage. They are both offered with similar engine types too, but engine commonality is already modelled. Widebody can be common with a narrowbody hence why A320 and A330 have some commonality (not just talking of pilots here). Just don't be so naive to think commonality is just what the eye can see, please.

LB, you are smarter than this. There is more to commonality than a fuselage. They are both offered with similar engine types too, but engine commonality is already modelled. Widebody can be common with a narrowbody hence why A320 and A330 have some commonality (not just talking of pilots here). Just don't be so naive to think commonality is just what the eye can see, please.

Just making a point that just because the cockpits are similar (type rating) doesn't mean the airframes are...

Just making a point that just because the cockpits are similar (type rating) doesn't mean the airframes are...

Certainly! That is not wrong. But what people don't appreciate is there is more to these plane in terms of avionics, systems, even rivets that is common than what you would believe. This boils down to the AWS concept of partial commonality which has been discussed in feature requests. Something I would really like to see implemented.

757 has good range so you will see that MANY MANY MANY MANY airlines will use them in this game in order to put so many flights on a route they are never flown in real life. They are the plane to go in and force out the competition.

757 has good range so you will see that MANY MANY MANY MANY airlines will use them in this game in order to put so many flights on a route they are never flown in real life. They are the plane to go in and force out the competition.

Yes but they will be nerfed when the engine release dates are finished as they lose initially 1000nm range on launch so then we will see more players using 767-200.

Swiftus, it really isnt; that is more parts commonality than the 737 classics and NGs. And we know how much you want them to share commonality.

No offense directed at anyone: although everyone is entitled to their opinions here, I think there should be a fine line drawn between people who think they know something and who actually know something when it comes to technical matters. Because the layman has a simplified view of these things and some concepts are hard for them to grasp. They come in with bold statements but actually the real facts should be believed from pilots, engineers and other people in industry.