This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration.Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here

But that reality means nothing to Wall Street, the financial media and public opinion. Tim Cook has lost control of the conversation. Fair or unfair, it is what it is. Cook needs to reestablish control as soon as possible, assuming he ever had control in the first place and he's capable of regaining it.

Because there's a good chance that, soon, perception
and reality will no longer be in Apple's favor. When that happens, all hell could really break loose. In other words, while you still actually do dominate, effectively make the case that mindshare matters more than marketshare and do a better job illustrating the reality that
Apple could have 80% market share in everything. Tomorrow.

As much as I subscribe to the notion that
Tim Cook has a company to run, I also realize he has to play the game. He must, like Steve Jobs did, manage the stock price and public perception while making it appear as if he is not managing the stock price and public perception. Running a company like Apple is as much about participating in the theatre of rhetoric as it is
running a company like Apple.

If Cook cannot own the debate, he becomes a liability. He's great behind the scenes managing the supply chain, but he's no different than the folks who have always done excellent work in Apple's marketing department. We're seeing what happens when a Steve Jobs' lieutenant takes the reigns as CEO over at
JCPenney(JCP - Get Report).
And it's not going well at all.

That's what Jobs told his marketing people. And it applies to what we're dealing with here. Tim Cook is not a front cover guy. He's a back cover guy. Again, for better or worse, that's how it is. And Apple needs to deal with it. If Cook can't step up, the board needs to make a move.