This isn't the first modern house to be built in Broadway/Flushing,but it certainly boasts one of the ugliest ill clad exteriors!The materials that were selected are way out of context with its contemporary lines.

This is obviously the work of a second string architect who could benefit greatly from a refresher course in design and siting.

Take a look north of Crocheron Ave. on the east side of 165th Streetat the second house in, for example.

Constructed in the later 1950s or 1960s(?), this striking contemporary home, with its sweeping facade (although very different from the rest)is appropriately sited to architecturally compliment the surrounding homes.The vertical wood siding blends harmoniously with its design.

The difference is this one has a peaked roof required under the Rickert/Finley deed restrictions which are binding in the area and enforceable in court.

Flat roofs are strictly forbidden !

Mr. Hsu might soon be learninga lesson about the errors of his ways regarding this!

I guess now we're all waiting for Mr. Hsu (or his posters)to pull the tired old "you're all anti Asian" card from the deck,if he hasn't done it already,in defense of committing his egregious covenant violations!

This is an ethnically diverse community in which its residentsdesire nothing more than to be good neighbors to each other.

So save any unfounded accusations of racial bias for the comic strips.

I see lots of jealousy and hating on this post, and lots of nonsense talk. If this violated restrictive covenants, has anyone sued the owner? He was going to build an exterior with different features to be more similar with neighboring houses until some whiners and complainers started giving him problems. I don't blame him one bit for changing plans and doing what he wanted to do with his own property after that.

A classic example as to how the preservation community has lost influence on the media in NY. The piece was effectively a love song to this crap, so say nothing about painting a picture of community preservationists as narrow minded and elderly.

I love it when (and its mostly Asians and Greeks that say this) I hear people say "who wants old out of date stuff? People like modern and new."

All I need to do is go to their home countries to see what their taste has in store for the rest of us.

A public education program is needed or you will be seeing junk like this in Brooklyn Heights in another decade.

They wouldn't have done that unless they found serious problems with what he was originally building. He sounds like Tommy Huang.

____

That doesn't have to be the case, auditors can't/won't agree on what to do if they think they have found an issue.

There is no accountability at the DOB and the auditors certainly wouldn't want to do anything to change that.

In any case, the pool off the basement, genius!

I think he picked the red just to stand out and annoy his neighbors (totally his right). From the looks of that stark interior, I don't think this family would even consider buying red apples. I bet they can't wait for the kid to get old enough and paint over those silly circles.

Hey I know when people buy a home they buy into the neighborhood, but I don't care. I plan to be the one who drives them from the neighborhood. As long as I can make money on my property, I will pave over the front yard and park cars on it, build an ugly brick box, cram as many illegal apartments into it as possible, ignore zoning regulations and restrictive covenants. This is Queens, not Long Island. And don't forget it.

Modern architecture can be elegant and beautiful when some thought and imagination are used. A modern house can still fit in a neighborhood of older homes and not look out of place when the architect has vision. Frank Lloyd Wright built beautiful modern homes that were inspired by their natural surroudings.

Unfortunately, these inept architects were apparently inspired by a cardboard box with some holes cut in it and spraypainted red. Nice job guys. This is ghetto architecture.

They started. They should have minded their own business. Read the article. It was only after they started picketing his construction site that he decided to make it less contextual. No one to blame but themselves.

“Everyone is entitled to build what they want to build as long as it is within the New York City building code.”

Horray for this owner for striking a victory for landowners around this city!!!! You sir are a giant among men and deserve congratulations.

Perhaps you missed the points made about a restrictive covenant limiting development of the property. If he didn't want to abide by the covenant, then he should have bought a house in a neighborhood that doesn't have one.

It's unfortunate that all you idiots have no taste whatsoever when it comes to architecture and design. Maybe if more houses looked like this one, Queens wouldn't have such a bad reputation as being the ugliest borough! And if it really "illegal" to have a flat roof, then how did the DOB allow it? Grow up you wankers!

This is not the type of house that I would build. But this is the United States, not the former Soviet Union. This country was built on the ideas of people who dared to be different. It's a shame that the so called "community" (usually comprised of a few retirees with too much time on their hands) feel that they have a right to tell someone what they should do with their property (maybe they miss their old eastern bloc homelands) and that others have to conform to its idea of beauty.

Restrictive covenants are private agreements enforced in courts by private individuals. They are not recognized by the City and hence, DOB does not enforce them. If you commies feel so strongly about these private covenants, why don't you sue the owner. In fact, I double dog dare you.

The civic over there is very well organized and on top of zoning/legal protocol.They have achieved State and Federal historic status and are on the slate for NYC Landmarking.

You can't blame, what is in this case, a very large majority of homeowners in a finite area for wanting to maintain an aesthetic order and way of life in their neighborhood. The homes there are very well built and are actually from a planned community, so they relate to one another and the terrain (it's a little hilly) as a larger entity.

History is widely under-appreciated, but it's something we need to preserve when a place or object warrants it's preservation. I'd like my son and other future generations to have some special neighborhoods remaining that they can stand in and behold, learn something from, actually experience another era and not just have to see in old pictures.B'way-Flushing is one of those neighborhoods.I dare say none of you have ever even been there,just more content to blog-on here with yer naive, ego-driven blather about freedom.

I've lived in Flushing (Queensboro Hill) for fifty years and have long loved the Broadway-Flushing neighborhood. I would walk around down there just to admire the houses.

I've also long been concerned about beautiful, classic, one-of-kind homes being torn down and replaced with generic two-family or three-family dwellings in such neighborhoods.

I don't know what the house Mr. Hsu tore down looked like. I might well have wanted it preserved. BUT, once it was gone, I'm grateful that he built a handsome modern structure, one that is in its own way as distinctive and appropriate to its time as its neighbors were to theirs. Considering some of the truly monstrous structures that tear-downs in my own area have produced, I think Mr. Hsu's neighbors have a lot to be thankful for.

I hope eventually everyone concerned will calm down and let "the shock of the new" wear off. There are more important things to worry about than whether a roof is flat or peaked!

Moshe, I understand the sentiment you expressed, the problem is where do you draw the line? If you are letting the peaked roof issue slide today, then tomorrow you may end up with something much more hideous down the street, and that will continue until the entire nabe has been replaced.

It's unfortunate that all you idiots have no taste whatsoever when it comes to architecture and design. Maybe if more houses looked like this one, Queens wouldn't have such a bad reputation as being the ugliest borough! And if it really "illegal" to have a flat roof, then how did the DOB allow it? Grow up you wankers!

--------------

The pot calling the kettle black.

The tearing down of Old Astoria, the hotelization of Dutch Kills, the infilling that is starting to destory the fabric of central Astoria, and the slipping Steinway Street makes your community the laughing stock of NYC.

Go back to astorians.com where they get excited at the latest Bangladeshi or Mexican eatery. Why don't you organize a gastromic tour of Elmhurst and Corona while you are at it?

Interesting - I grew up just outside the Crocheron area - neve knew they had CC&Rs over there, even when I looked at houses there. Depending on what's in the CC&R, it would have shot down me buying a house, even if I agreed with them (I don't like CC&Rs)(I've seen CC&Rs the specified what colors your front door could be, and even what color your garbage cans can be)

BTW They MAY have problems enforcing the CC&R, _IF_ they have let other people slide on the CC&R

The idea that men possessed the right to acquire and enjoy property separate and apart from the prerogative of government was one of the "unalienable rights" grounded in "the laws of Nature and Nature's God" at the heart of the American Revolution. In the founders' view, property rights did not emanate from government. Rather, they emanated from the nature of man, and it was the function of government to protect the rights conferred on man by nature.

Again I reapeat: Mr. Hsu. you are a giant among men and deserve congratulations. A blow has been struck against all those who chose to interfere with private citizens use of their private property.

For 15 years I lived 3 blocks from this house on one of the prettiest blocks in North Flushing in a classic old colonial. I left two years ago, but as a long time resident I can say that I think this house is just fine for the neighborhood--and rather, much nicer than the few McMansions with columns that managed to get built. No one made a stink over those and they are much more tasteless, in my opinion. There were several of those on my old block, 158 st. And let's not forget the pink house on 32 and 159. Come on guys. This resident is fine. And for the record, there is another modern flatroof around there that's sort of mid centrury modern, i can't remember the street but it's on the way to the Boadway stop, up on a hill.

"The idea that men possessed the right to acquire and enjoy property separate and apart from the prerogative of government was one of the "unalienable rights" grounded in "the laws of Nature and Nature's God" at the heart of the American Revolution. In the founders' view, property rights did not emanate from government."

This has nothing to do with unalienable rights and freedom from government interference. This is a property located in a neighborhood that has strict deed restrictions which will be upheld in a court of law.

NYT, 2/16/06: "The answer is rooted in the neighborhood's history, dating to 1906, when the Rickert-Finley company bought three farms there. As the company built homes, it set in place deed restrictions that mandated features like large yards and no front-yard fences. Through the years, Ms. Ferrigno and her cohorts have enforced those restrictions in court."

The homeowners association has never lost in court. Now go stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

So what is this ignoramus going to do, take the full color New York Magazine spread to court and present it as evidence in a quirky attempt to convince the judge that he's not violating the deed restrictions?

He might introduceall of these comments as evidence in court and try to imply that we're all a bunch of "racists" because we're suing himfor his violation of the covenants which restrict flat roofed homes being built in our area.

These are interesting deductions, but have nothing to do with me. I usually rode my bike to the area, chained it to a lamppost and then walked around. My sisters, who are more religious than me, would often walk much farther than two miles to pass the time on a pleasant Sabbath afternoon. Perhaps Anonymous is one of those Queens residents who can't live without a car, but many of us enjoy walking.

He goes on to say:

Another Hsu created individual posting here, no doubt,

So let me assure him that I have never Mr. Hsu nor do I know any more about him than is reported in this blog or other such media. Although I think his modern house is OK, I have no knowledge of his other activities or interest in advocating for them.

If I may say so, I do find it strange to be accused of being a hoax by someone who posts under the informative cognomen of "Anonymous."

It's a shame really, since in a later post on the same day, Anonymous says:

For 15 years I lived 3 blocks from this house on one of the prettiest blocks in NorthFlushing in a classic old colonial. I left twoyears ago, but as a long time resident I cansay that I think this house is just fine for theneighborhood--and rather, much nicer thanthe few McMansions with columns thatmanaged to get built. No one made a stinkover those and they are much moretasteless, in my opinion.

Assuming that's the same "Anonymous" talking, it seems we are essentially in agreement. So Anonymous, you can believe that there's another real person here agreeing with you, or you can believe it's just a Hsu-created straw man saying so for his own nefarious reasons.

Spotted a piece of Queens Crap in your community?

Please note

Italicized passages and many of the photos come from other websites. The links to these websites are provided within the posts.

Why your neighborhood is full of Queens Crap

"The difference between dishonest and honest graft: for dishonest graft one worked solely for one's own interests, while for honest graft one pursued the interests of one's party, one's state, and one's personal interests all together." - George Washington Plunkitt

Sites that kick ass:

The above organizations are recognized by Queens Crap as being beneficial to the city as a whole, by fighting to preserve the history and character of our neighborhoods. They are not connected to this website and the opinions presented here do not necessarily represent the positions of these organizations.

The comments left by posters to this site do not necessarily represent the views of the blogger or webmaster.