What the commentator said has truth behind it. The wording being used by the political left is twisting the words all the time.
Try slowing the clip down and I'm sure you hear then

He's already painfully slow at attempting to make his point. But that's pretty common with these right wing videos. Apparently when talking to people on the right you need to make your points very slowly.

I believe twisting the words to make them sound like your getting something would be Obama's Buffet Rule.
By Buffet saying his secretary pays more in taxes is a lie. Or his secretary makes more than him.
From the way I understand it is inverstment taxes is now 15% and Obama wants to raise those taxes to 30%.
Will that be enough to make a dent in our debt? Not.
We owe trillions and with tax increases on the wealthy would only bring in 40 some billion.

He's already painfully slow at attempting to make his point. But that's pretty common with these right wing videos. Apparently when talking to people on the right you need to make your points very slowly.

Actually the talking points from the left needs to speak very fast in order to get the deception past without being noticed.
Speaking slowly would only ensure there is nothing to hide in between the lines.

I believe twisting the words to make them sound like your getting something would be Obama's Buffet Rule.
By Buffet saying his secretary pays more in taxes is a lie. Or his secretary makes more than him.
From the way I understand it is inverstment taxes is now 15% and Obama wants to raise those taxes to 30%.
Will that be enough to make a dent in our debt? Not.
We owe trillions and with tax increases on the wealthy would only bring in 40 some billion.

No, what he said was that his secretary was paying a high tax rate, which is entirely possible because most of his income comes from investments, which is taxed at a lower rate while his secretary has to actually work for her money, which is taxed at a higher rate.

No single stroke of a pen will eliminate the trillions of dollars of debt. So by your logic we should do nothing? Every “little bit that won’t matter” has turned into a big stinking mess.

No, what he said was that his secretary was paying a high tax rate, which is entirely possible because most of his income comes from investments, which is taxed at a lower rate while his secretary has to actually work for her money, which is taxed at a higher rate.

No single stroke of a pen will eliminate the trillions of dollars of debt. So by your logic we should do nothing? Every “little bit that won’t matter” has turned into a big stinking mess.

You are correct in saying that his secretary pays her taxes(income) which is higher than investment taxes. 15% for investment and 30% for income.
Taxes peoples investment income will not lower the debt, but to reduce government spending will.
You do have to admit that our elected officials spending is out of control.