speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.speedy231278

speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

Does that really matter ?

[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.[/p][/quote]Does that really matter ?retry69

speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

Does that really matter ?

I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.

[quote][p][bold]retry69[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.[/p][/quote]Does that really matter ?[/p][/quote]I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.speedy231278

speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

Does that really matter ?

I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.

Yes well at least we know where your priorities lie

[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]retry69[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.[/p][/quote]Does that really matter ?[/p][/quote]I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.[/p][/quote]Yes well at least we know where your priorities lieretry69

speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

Does that really matter ?

I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.

Yes well at least we know where your priorities lie

The best thing to do when a young man dies is to quibble about the irrelevant details.

Thoughts are with friends and family of this chap.

[quote][p][bold]retry69[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]retry69[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.[/p][/quote]Does that really matter ?[/p][/quote]I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.[/p][/quote]Yes well at least we know where your priorities lie[/p][/quote]The best thing to do when a young man dies is to quibble about the irrelevant details.
Thoughts are with friends and family of this chap.MrDMan

speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

Does that really matter ?

I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.

For GOD SAKE a young man has died and all you can talk about is the flippen tent. You heartless idiot.
A young man has lost his life far to young and a family have lost their loved one, have a thought for those.

[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]retry69[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.[/p][/quote]Does that really matter ?[/p][/quote]I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.[/p][/quote]For GOD SAKE a young man has died and all you can talk about is the flippen tent. You heartless idiot.
A young man has lost his life far to young and a family have lost their loved one, have a thought for those.bubbles20

I think the Echo should not enable Comments on stories such as this. If they feel the need to they should do it after next of kin have been informed.

There is nothing anyone can say on here that is relevant to the situation.

A young man has lost their life and it could be for any reason. There are people out there who will have to deal with this tragedy and they don't need to see comments.

Its just my personal opinion on news items like this.

I think the Echo should not enable Comments on stories such as this. If they feel the need to they should do it after next of kin have been informed.
There is nothing anyone can say on here that is relevant to the situation.
A young man has lost their life and it could be for any reason. There are people out there who will have to deal with this tragedy and they don't need to see comments.
Its just my personal opinion on news items like this.bobthedestroyer

bobthedestroyer wrote:
I think the Echo should not enable Comments on stories such as this. If they feel the need to they should do it after next of kin have been informed.

There is nothing anyone can say on here that is relevant to the situation.

A young man has lost their life and it could be for any reason. There are people out there who will have to deal with this tragedy and they don't need to see comments.

Its just my personal opinion on news items like this.

I completely agree, however this unpleasant little paper is unlikely to listen.
I comment now not on the story, just the Echo policy

[quote][p][bold]bobthedestroyer[/bold] wrote:
I think the Echo should not enable Comments on stories such as this. If they feel the need to they should do it after next of kin have been informed.
There is nothing anyone can say on here that is relevant to the situation.
A young man has lost their life and it could be for any reason. There are people out there who will have to deal with this tragedy and they don't need to see comments.
Its just my personal opinion on news items like this.[/p][/quote]I completely agree, however this unpleasant little paper is unlikely to listen.
I comment now not on the story, just the Echo policyBranksome snail

I really can't believe the comments here - arguing about tents etc. when a young man has died! He is someone's son, brother, friend etc. and all I want to say is 'condolences to all those affected by this tragedy'.

I really can't believe the comments here - arguing about tents etc. when a young man has died! He is someone's son, brother, friend etc. and all I want to say is 'condolences to all those affected by this tragedy'.BournemouthMum

speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

you are too tense
............. two tents
an idiot

[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.[/p][/quote]you are too tense
............. two tents
an idiotfizzy fert

speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

Does that really matter ?

I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.

Nice one!

[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]retry69[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.[/p][/quote]Does that really matter ?[/p][/quote]I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.[/p][/quote]Nice one!JemBmth

speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

Does that really matter ?

It does to some of the morons that post on here.RIP whatever the circumstances my thoughts are with all those concerned

[quote][p][bold]retry69[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.[/p][/quote]Does that really matter ?[/p][/quote]It does to some of the morons that post on here.RIP whatever the circumstances my thoughts are with all those concernednosuchluck54

The most unpleasant thing about this article is that the deceased has been described in reasonable detail before the next of kin have been informed. If they still have not been found, there may very well be numerous persons worried about the whereabouts of their next of kin for no good reason.

Would it not be more apt to simply state that a body has been found and that the police had not contacted the next of kin?

The most unpleasant thing about this article is that the deceased has been described in reasonable detail before the next of kin have been informed. If they still have not been found, there may very well be numerous persons worried about the whereabouts of their next of kin for no good reason.
Would it not be more apt to simply state that a body has been found and that the police had not contacted the next of kin?speedy231278

This paper is definitely getting a ridiculous amount of sad sad people who just find the need to comment negative things on EVERY ARTICLE, seems as they have nothing better to do! A boy has lost his life and people still feel the need to do so.

R.I.P to the boy, same age as me no age to go :(

This paper is definitely getting a ridiculous amount of sad sad people who just find the need to comment negative things on EVERY ARTICLE, seems as they have nothing better to do! A boy has lost his life and people still feel the need to do so.
R.I.P to the boy, same age as me no age to go :(kelly93uk

speedy231278 wrote:
The most unpleasant thing about this article is that the deceased has been described in reasonable detail before the next of kin have been informed. If they still have not been found, there may very well be numerous persons worried about the whereabouts of their next of kin for no good reason.

Would it not be more apt to simply state that a body has been found and that the police had not contacted the next of kin?

His girlfriend knows about it, it's just his immediate family they can't contact at present

[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
The most unpleasant thing about this article is that the deceased has been described in reasonable detail before the next of kin have been informed. If they still have not been found, there may very well be numerous persons worried about the whereabouts of their next of kin for no good reason.
Would it not be more apt to simply state that a body has been found and that the police had not contacted the next of kin?[/p][/quote]His girlfriend knows about it, it's just his immediate family they can't contact at presentiseestupidpeople

So a body of a homed man is plastered on the echo paper but a homeless man dies in lower gardens n a homeless person is sexually assaulted n that goes nowhere on the echo! Oh yeah that's cos society doesn't give two shots about homeless people n society is judgemental! Oh and the council say there isn't a homeless problem is Bournemouth! Well that's horse **** cos there's st least 100 homeless people in town ... I've seen it

So a body of a homed man is plastered on the echo paper but a homeless man dies in lower gardens n a homeless person is sexually assaulted n that goes nowhere on the echo! Oh yeah that's cos society doesn't give two shots about homeless people n society is judgemental! Oh and the council say there isn't a homeless problem is Bournemouth! Well that's horse **** cos there's st least 100 homeless people in town ... I've seen itWheelieTownsend

My thoughts go to His family and friends
When my brother was murdered in September we spent all day at Southampton hospital we had to turn off life support and left 7 o'clock in the evening I did even make it to the front door of my house before the echo was on the phone no though to family I'd not had chance to explain to my children and was in a state of shock as long as they get there story no feelings for devestated family

My thoughts go to His family and friends
When my brother was murdered in September we spent all day at Southampton hospital we had to turn off life support and left 7 o'clock in the evening I did even make it to the front door of my house before the echo was on the phone no though to family I'd not had chance to explain to my children and was in a state of shock as long as they get there story no feelings for devestated familychrissytanzanite

chrissytanzanite wrote:
My thoughts go to His family and friends
When my brother was murdered in September we spent all day at Southampton hospital we had to turn off life support and left 7 o'clock in the evening I did even make it to the front door of my house before the echo was on the phone no though to family I'd not had chance to explain to my children and was in a state of shock as long as they get there story no feelings for devestated family

Horrendous journalism. Yet they continue to win awards!

[quote][p][bold]chrissytanzanite[/bold] wrote:
My thoughts go to His family and friends
When my brother was murdered in September we spent all day at Southampton hospital we had to turn off life support and left 7 o'clock in the evening I did even make it to the front door of my house before the echo was on the phone no though to family I'd not had chance to explain to my children and was in a state of shock as long as they get there story no feelings for devestated family[/p][/quote]Horrendous journalism. Yet they continue to win awards!bobthedestroyer

WheelieTownsend wrote:
So a body of a homed man is plastered on the echo paper but a homeless man dies in lower gardens n a homeless person is sexually assaulted n that goes nowhere on the echo! Oh yeah that's cos society doesn't give two shots about homeless people n society is judgemental! Oh and the council say there isn't a homeless problem is Bournemouth! Well that's horse **** cos there's st least 100 homeless people in town ... I've seen it

I've seen it too. 5.30pm on sunday just gone there was a soup kitchen set up near the toilets in the lower gardens. Marvellous advertising for the town as the tourists stopped and stared at the array of humanlike forms shuffling along the queue. There were probably 60+ in the queue.
Perhaps its a normal sunday event, I'm not normally there at that time.
I didn't have my camera sadly.

[quote][p][bold]WheelieTownsend[/bold] wrote:
So a body of a homed man is plastered on the echo paper but a homeless man dies in lower gardens n a homeless person is sexually assaulted n that goes nowhere on the echo! Oh yeah that's cos society doesn't give two shots about homeless people n society is judgemental! Oh and the council say there isn't a homeless problem is Bournemouth! Well that's horse **** cos there's st least 100 homeless people in town ... I've seen it[/p][/quote]I've seen it too. 5.30pm on sunday just gone there was a soup kitchen set up near the toilets in the lower gardens. Marvellous advertising for the town as the tourists stopped and stared at the array of humanlike forms shuffling along the queue. There were probably 60+ in the queue.
Perhaps its a normal sunday event, I'm not normally there at that time.
I didn't have my camera sadly.Sir Beachy-Head

ianexams wrote:
A very sad day for such a young person, may you rest in Peace with the Heavenly Angels taking care of you.

A bit early for magic mushrooms isn't it ?

[quote][p][bold]ianexams[/bold] wrote:
A very sad day for such a young person, may you rest in Peace with the Heavenly Angels taking care of you.[/p][/quote]A bit early for magic mushrooms isn't it ?Sir Beachy-Head

speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

Does that really matter ?

I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.

retry69 has it's name for a reason. It tries 68 times to get things right. 69 just seems to baffle him ;) ...

[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]retry69[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.[/p][/quote]Does that really matter ?[/p][/quote]I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.[/p][/quote]retry69 has it's name for a reason. It tries 68 times to get things right. 69 just seems to baffle him ;) ...HRH of Boscombe

speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

Does that really matter ?

I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.

Okay so I've just found out that this is actually an old close friend of mine found so I come to see if the comments could provide some sort of comfort but all I see is people arguing about a stupid tent. I'm sorry but this isn't exactly the time or place

[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]retry69[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.[/p][/quote]Does that really matter ?[/p][/quote]I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.[/p][/quote]Okay so I've just found out that this is actually an old close friend of mine found so I come to see if the comments could provide some sort of comfort but all I see is people arguing about a stupid tent. I'm sorry but this isn't exactly the time or placeEddievedder

speedy231278 wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.

This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.

Does that really matter ?

I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.

Okay so I've just found out that this is actually an old close friend of mine found so I come to see if the comments could provide some sort of comfort but all I see is people arguing about a stupid tent. I'm sorry but this isn't exactly the time or place

Me too man, this is f**king ridiculous. I'm so sorry.

[quote][p][bold]Eddievedder[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]retry69[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]speedy231278[/bold] wrote:
There's also a tent right by the back door of the building.[/p][/quote]This comment no longer makes sense now the article has been edited and no longer states that there is a white tent in the woodland near the car park.[/p][/quote]Does that really matter ?[/p][/quote]I pointed out at the time that there may have been more than one tent because the location of the one I saw was not where the Echo reported one to be. For all I knew, there could have been multiple tents as this is/was described as a 'major incident'. Since the article was edited and the reference to the one in the wooded area was removed, it meant that the initial comment was no longer relevent. Like most of yours.[/p][/quote]Okay so I've just found out that this is actually an old close friend of mine found so I come to see if the comments could provide some sort of comfort but all I see is people arguing about a stupid tent. I'm sorry but this isn't exactly the time or place[/p][/quote]Me too man, this is f**king ridiculous. I'm so sorry.BTownend2

ianexams wrote:
A very sad day for such a young person, may you rest in Peace with the Heavenly Angels taking care of you.

A bit early for magic mushrooms isn't it ?

You're racist & nasty too.

[quote][p][bold]Sir Beachy-Head[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]ianexams[/bold] wrote:
A very sad day for such a young person, may you rest in Peace with the Heavenly Angels taking care of you.[/p][/quote]A bit early for magic mushrooms isn't it ?[/p][/quote]You're racist & nasty too.stevobath