Not too bad an article, though a little tongue-in-the-cheek, perhaps.
But
if you really wanted to know what I write or state happened to the
Arrow,
and the direct indications of it, you really should have called me up
and
asked me.

A little hard electromagnetics knowledge greater than the standard
model
U(1) theory and ordinary electrical engineering might be interesting
to you,
since such has definitely not been applied by the Canadian
Transportation
Safety Board in investigating the Arrow DC-8 incident.

Here's a direct quotation from the U.S. Secretary of Defense, dealing
with
the very kind of electromagnetic weapons that you thought was a
conspiratorial notion of mine when I wrote about them openly.
Feel free to
check the reference; it's in the official transcript as cited.

"Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of
terrorism whereby
they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely
through
the use of electromagnetic waves... So there are plenty of ingenious
minds
out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror
upon
other nations...It's real, and that's the reason why we have to
intensify
our [counterterrorism] efforts."

Secretary of Defense
William Cohen at an
April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam
Nunn.
Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen,
Q&A at
the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S.
Strategy,
University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.

Note that the Secretary did not speak the words in the square brackets
of
the quotation. Those words were inserted after his speech to
perhaps tone
the tenor down a bit. These weapons he referred to are more
general,
strategic weapons and they have been on site in Russia since
1963.
They
were tested worldwide in various incidents in the late 1950s and early
1960s, and are the weapons that Khrushchev referred to, in speaking to
the
Presidium in January 1960. They are not some little hand-held
devices by
terrorists. You cannot change the climate or initiate volcano
eruptions or
generate earthquakes by such little "ordinary" laser
devices, etc. If you
wish to initiate a volcano, e.g., you are going to have to get the
excess
energy down into the rocks beneath the earth, to where the volcano is
still
active, but just not breaching its channel on up to the surface and so
dormant. None of your radar engineers, directed energy weapons
fellows,
local university professors, etc. can build EM systems that do that.
Try it
and see.

Unfortunately, since the news media were so terribly concerned with
the
Clinton-Lewinsky scandal at the time (April 1997) that Secretary Cohen
confirmed the weapons, not a single newsman or reporter there on the
scene
where this statement was made, even reacted to the first open
confirmation
of these weapons by a high U.S. official. Not one.
Obviously not a
titillating scandal sort of thing for the journalists.

In short, Russell, the Secretary of Defense of the United States
confirmed
that there are indeed novel kinds of EM weapons, right now and
have been
for some time, which have been and are being used to (1) initiate
earthquakes, (2) engineer the weather and
climate, and (3) initiate
the
eruption of volcanoes. We wrote about those exact uses of the
weaponry
decades ago. Several nations now have such weapons. Three
of them (two on
one side and the other on a hostile side) are even firing practice
shots
into Western Australia, as a convenient test range.

If one can build weapons that do those things the Secretary confirmed,
they
can jolly well shoot down aircraft with ease. And yes, destroy
the U.S.S.
Thresher with ease, which they did.

Further, we wrote of scalar interferometry, which actually uses
longitudinal
EM wave transmitters to do the interferometry. But as we shall
mention, the
LWs are always accompanied by exactly one-to-one correlated
time-polarized
EM longitudinal waves in the time domain. Don't worry, the
time-polarized
EM wave does appear in quantum field theory, which is perhaps our most
successful modern theory. It's just that Western scientists are
only just
now learning how to make longitudinal EM waves, and have not yet
learned how
to make the time-polarized EM waves. Actually they don't have to
make them;
they get them for free whenever they make a good longitudinal EM wave.

Two weeks before the Russian scalar interferometer weapon killed the
Arrow
DC-8, in late November 1985 that same Russian weapon was practicing
against
convenient U.S. shuttle launches at Cape Canaveral, Florida, for crew
training, and was offsetting the strike of the resulting
electromagnetic
missile formed to do the dirty work (final kill) so it would not hit
the
shuttle and kill it. I obtained the rights to a photograph taken
by Bob
Gladwin of the actual strike of that EM missile, offset from that
night
shuttle launch in latter Nov. 1985, and published that photograph
openly. I
attach a picture of that photograph. In other words, I published
the
smoking gun, not idle speculation.

In the sky above the shuttle launch at Cape Canaveral that night was
another
little stationary EM missile (ball of EM energy, glowing) used as a
known
registration point. The Russians were using a standard artillery
firing
technique: shift from a known registration point. As an old
field
artilleryman, I had no difficulty whatsoever in recognizing that
familiar
type of artillery registration and how the shooting was being
conducted and
why. Hundreds of persons in that area in Florida that night
observed that
latter "registration point" ball of light high above the
shuttle launch. I
also obtained the rights to a photo of that ball of light as the
distant
operator slew it away. I bought it from George Suchary, the
photographer
who took it, and published it as well. I also include a snapshot
of it.
Further, that photo (by George Suchary) was also published in the Fort
Pierce Tribune in Florida. Check it out. This is about two
weeks before
the Arrow DC-8 was killed at Gander. The Russian crews were
practicing even
then.

Two weeks later, that same Russian longitudinal EM interferometer
weapon
that had been doing its final crew training and firing practice
against U.S.
shuttle launches in latter Nov., killed the Arrow DC-8 at Gander on
Dec. 12,
1985.

We also published the fact that, courtesy of British intelligence, a
Western
spy in a secret meeting of the Communist Parties of Europe in Prague,
in
1975, chaired by Brezhnev, had something significant that later was to
bear
on the year 1985, when the Arrow was killed. Therein 1975
Brezhnev
actually named the year, 1985, that the Russians expected to be able
to move
anywhere in the world they wished, control the airspace over the ocean
and
over much of the land, etc. So 1985 was a "watershed"
year in which the
Soviets planned to be ready to do whatever they might wish. They
made that
schedule, and the Arrow DC-8 was just one of the tests conducted in
1985.
They had to "kill" something, however, to prove the final
milestone for the
1985 success of the schedule. The Gander incident was the
demonstration
that the milestone had been successfully met. The tests then
continued on
into 1986 and especially Spring of 1986, as I previously wrote.
Two other
kills were a Titan ICBM fired from Vandenberg AFB, and a picture of
that
explosion is also published in Aviation Week & Space Technology.
There are
two of the photos, one cropped to simulate close-up, and one the
original
shot from further back where you can see above the explosion which is
well-developed. There about an inch above that explosion is that
little
tell-tale "registration point" ball of light. Check it
out.

I had an engineer friend at NBC in Los Angeles study that videotape,
frame
by frame. That little ball of light appeared in 17 frames, and
moved off
completely independently of the explosion. There were no
"bogies on the
range" at Vandenberg AFB when the Titan was launched.
Again, we had the
smoking gun. The kill was simple, very similar to the kill of
the U.S.S.
Thresher. Just surge the rising missile with some EM energy
appearing in
the missile right out of the local spacetime. That explodes the
propellant
all-at-once, hence the missile explosion. That was the test of
an
interferometer used in a launch-phase ABM defense system mode.
The Arrow
DC-8 was a simulated test of the launch-phase anti-nuclear-bomber
mode,
where the bomber is killed on the runway or just at or shortly after
take-off.

Further, at Gander on Dec. 12th, a Canadian eyewitness, Judy Parsons,
physically saw the actual strike of the EM missile, as a streak of
light
that came out of the clouds and struck the aircraft just at or after
its
liftoff, hitting it in the right fuselage ahead of the wing and
engines. A
picture of the hole burned right through the fuselage of the aircraft
was
published in Aviation Week & Space Technology -- check it out.
The edges of
the holes were tested and there were no explosives residues there.
Further,
the recorders on board the aircraft, on two separate channels, were
"pulsed"
by that EM missile strike, precisely at the same time, and thus
recorded the
sudden anomalous voltage pulse resulting from a strong EM anomaly that
had
struck the aircraft. Again, go check it out on the recorder
prints
themselves. Don't just write about it from afar, but be an
investigative
reporter.

Further, the EM ball of energy explosively entered the forward cabin
very
energetically. It explosively and instantly massively ignited
the plastic
material in the forward cabin, zipping around furiously in there.
The
plastics explosively outgassed -- one product being hydrogen cyanide.
A few
breaths and any and all in that area were either dead of cyanide
poisoning
or were dying of it. Autopsies of the bodies later showed that
about half
the personnel on the aircraft were in fact dead of hydrogen cyanide
poisoning prior to the crash and explosion of the aircraft. That
information, however, seems to have been withheld from the Canadian
Transportation Safety Board. Again, go check it out.

How many aircraft that have been destroyed by terrorist bombs
worldwide,
have showed that half the dead personnel died of hydrogen cyanide
poisoning
before the explosion or destruction of the aircraft? Again,
go check it
out, don't just sit in your chair and write.

The rigorous scientific proof of scalar interferometry is contained in
a
paper by Myron W. Evans, P.K. Anastasovski, T.E. Bearden et al. (some
15
authors), "On Whittaker's Representation of the Electromagnetic
Entity in
Vacuo, Part V: The Production of Transverse Fields and Energy by
Scalar
Interferometry," Journal of New Energy, 4(3), Winter, 1999, p.
76-78.

If you will check, you will find that Evans is a world-class theorist
and
has over 600 papers in the hard science literature, is also the
prestigious
editor of scientific books and series as part of the series by
Nobelist
Prigogine for Wiley, etc. Many others of the 15 or so authors
are also
recognized and even prestigious scientists. So the referenced
paper is of
very high scientific quality. It's for real. The AIAS
group that published
this referenced paper also has many other scientific publications in
higher
symmetry electrodynamics (far beyond the ordinary electrical
engineering and
radar engineering!) in leading journals such as Foundations of
Physics,
Physica Scripta, Optik, etc. Again, go check it out. This
is physics.
Simply check the citations in the literature under those names.
Then decide
whether this is an idle conspiracy theory or not.

By biasing the transmitter chassis grounds either highly positive or
highly
negative, the hostile interferometer weapon can control whether
diverging
(scattering, hence heating) EM energy or converging (cooling) EM
energy is
produced in the distant interference zone. In the Arrow case,
the same
weapon was used in two modes and switched abruptly between the modes.
First, converging energy was produced inside the combustion chambers
of the
engines. Note that this EM energy arises right out of the local
spacetime,
from "inside" the system and proceeding toward the outside.
It does not
"propagate through 3-space" in the normal sense, or like
normal EM waves,
from "outside" to "inside" if it can get there. It
starts in the inside
already.

As we stated, this is not your usual electrical engineering! The
electrical
engineers at your local university will not have the foggiest notion
of what
we are saying, or that what we are saying is already rigorously
proven. But
if you really wish to know what killed the Arrow, you are going to
have to
get into something that your local university professor probably does
not
even know. He does not design and build longitudinal EM wave
interferometers.

The emerging convergent (cooling) energy in the jet engine gases
cooled the
combustion, hence reduced the thrust of the engines although the
turbines
were turning at normal speed. Now what is important in aircraft
lift is the
ratio of thrust per weight. If for a given thrust the weight is
increased
(such as in heavy icing), then the thrust per weight ratio is reduced
as is
well-known and recognized. On the other hand, if there is no
increase in
weight but the thrust is reduced by engine combustion cooling, the
thrust
per weight ratio is reduced also. This latter method of reducing
aircraft
lift does not appear in the checksheets of the investigative boards in
either Canada or the United States, because they know nothing of
longitudinal EM wave interferometry. Those Investigative Boards
know
nothing about longitudinal EM wave interferometry, exothermic and
endothermic modes, etc.

Nonetheless, a previous test of this capability had been conducted
earlier
that year, by flaming out the engines one-by-one of a jetliner
heading back
to Los Angeles over the northern route. The aircraft fell some
30,000 feet
before the pilot managed to restart the engines, turn and limp into
San
Francisco and land as a emergency measure. A major
signature that
spacetime curvature was involved, occurred on that aircraft, and was
completely unrecognized by the investigators (whose electrical
expertise is
essentially confined to electrical engineering, radar, communications,
etc.). That incident made the international headlines and news, so you
should be able to check it out easily.

In the Arrow DC-8 incident, check the results of analysis of the
recorder channels. As the pilot lifted off, he instantly felt the reduced
lift, and
knew that he had a serious problem because the aircraft was not
lifting as
it should. He apparently recognized how serious this was, and
started to
turn to the right, probably to come back around and land again and get
the
aircraft rechecked. The aircraft had been de-iced and it was
checked again
for ice before take-off. It was not iced, in spite of the
official board
"finding" when half the members of the board --those
dissenting -- were
conveniently absent. At that moment when the pilot just started
his right
turn, the distant operators switched the interferometer chassis
grounds to
"hot" mode potentials, narrowed the beaming (this is not
propagating through
space as is normally modeled in ordinary electrodynamics, but is
propagating
"inside" the great electrostatic scalar potential that is
the active vacuum
and decomposes into bidirectional longitudinal EM waves by Whittaker'
1903 decomposition).

You will be hard put to find a Canadian or U.S. professor who has
really
read and studied that 1903 Whittaker paper. Mass is also mostly
empty space
filled with EM fields, potentials, and waves (all of which are just
bundles
of EM longitudinal waves and their dynamics, as shown by combining
Whittaker's 1903 and 1904 work in two papers). So there is
a vast "new"
kind of electromagnetics infolded inside all our normal EM waves,
potentials, and fields. That is rigorous and now established,
though hardly
known.

So Longitudinal EM waves are free to propagate "inside" and
"through" the
interior (a sort of "subspace" inside) of normal EM waves,
potentials, and
fields. Thus both intervening space and mass (mass is mostly
empty space
filled with EM potentials, waves, and fields!) are great superhighways
of
huge bundles of longitudinal EM waves (subspace) through which one can
readily pass additional longitudinal EM waves at will.

Stick around; a friend and close colleague has invented a
communications
system using that infolded longitudinal EM inside normal fields,
waves, and
potentials. He has demonstrated superluminal communication inside DC
potentials, including both black and white and color TV signals, and
has
unlimited bandwidth. His work is being licensed by several major
communications companies of the world, and will just quietly start
appearing
in equipment in the market place. Bandwidth is the awful
millstone around
the big communications systems' necks, and my colleague has the answer
to
that problem. You will see those systems emerging before the end
of this
year. You can count on it.

In its changed mode at Gander, the sharply narrowed interferometer
beams
were used to produce -- well above and off to the right side of the
aircraft -- a very hot little ball of EM energy a few inches in
diameter.
Then the distant operator simply moved this "EM missile"
sharply down to
coincide in position with the lifting Arrow aircraft just beginning
its turn
to the right. Rather like placing one's range tracking cursor
over the
target. The EM missile struck the aircraft in the right forward
fuselage as
stated, with the results as stated. With half the personnel dead
and dying
of cyanide poisoning in seconds, the stricken craft sank, still
tail-down,
and struck the ground and exploded, killing all on board.

It doesn't end there.

At the time, the National Security Council of the United States was
engaged
in a blatantly illegal and criminal clandestine business, the
Iran-Contra
affair, which had not yet been openly exposed. The NSC itself
apparently
suspected that an Arab terrorist bomb was what did the Arrow DC-8 in.
To
the NSC, the most important thing was not to have a finding of Arab
terrorist bomb, else the hue and cry from the American public and
subsequent
necessary extensive investigations by several agencies would likely
uncover
Iran-Contra. I point out that the Iran-Contra was felonious, not
a
misdemeanor, and literally was high crimes in high places. So
yes, we
really are pointing out a criminal conspiracy also involved in the
Arrow
DC-8 affair. And it really was there as stated, and Iran-Contra
really was
later forced into the open.

So the U.S. placed great pressure on the Canadian government to get
its
Arrow investigation finished quickly and have a finding of de-icing.
Now
perhaps one can understand why the Board hastily published a report
when
about half its members -- conveniently the dissenters -- were absent.
Eyewitnesses who actually saw the streak-down of the EM missile with
their
own eyes, and saw it physically strike the aircraft, were not allowed
to
testify to the Canadian board, and the board did not see their eye
witness
written testimony either. A high ranking American officer
arrived on site,
and seemed most anxious for the site to be quickly bulldozed over.
The
Canadian board split on its finding, and the "official"
finding was quickly
published only when the dissenting members were physically absent.
And so
on. Yep, there was a conspiracy all right -- to prevent the
Iran-Contra
affair from being smoked out in the open.

It doesn't end there.

When a physical system such as an aircraft is struck by such an EM
missile
formed out of locally curved spacetime, the energy -- as we stated --
arises
from everywhere within that local ST and goes outward (for diverging
energy
mode). We have a completely different EM nuclear reaction set,
than
anything that presently appears in particle physics, because they
simply do
not consider "inside out" EM energy propagation and
interactions with the
quarks and gluons inside the nucleons. Hence where the EM
missile strikes
and penetrates the metal, there is a most unique nuclear interaction
that
does not and cannot occur with normal EM transverse wave weapons which
propagate their energy beams through space normally, and thus from
"outside"
to "inside". In the LW interferometry case, the energy
arises from within
the atoms -- even within the nucleons themselves -- and proceeds
outside the
nuclei, atoms, etc. In short, it interacts first with the gluons
and
quarks, etc. in the nucleons of the struck material. The result
is that a
quark can be flipped easily by this kind of different "inside to
outside"
excitation. The result of quark flipping is to change the
isotope of struck
metal by changing a neutron into a proton or vice versa.

There is one new isotope of Aluminum that can be and is formed that
way,
that is also long-term weakly radioactive. Hence it persists in
the struck
metal for years. Therefore a rigorous measurement of the exact
isotopic
constitution of the aluminum in the exact struck material will show an
isotope constituency that differs from that in the rest of the
aircraft
aluminum. Mass spectrometry can reveal the isotopic composition
change. If
this kind of test finds that isotopic change, then that is 100% proof
that a
scalar interferometer hit that target at that point, since directed
energy
weapons of normal kind do not change the isotopic constitution of the
aluminum. Lasers and ordinary directed energy weapons do not
have such an
effect, because there is no "inside to outside" energy in
them. Also,
ordinary explosions do not cause such isotopic change of the aluminum.

Such a test, of course, was not conducted upon the Arrow, and to my
knowledge has not been conducted on other aircraft also shot down --
over
the U.S. or Canada or close to them -- by foreign longitudinal EM wave
interferometers.

It still does not end there.

When an LW interferometer makes a violent strike on a target with an
EM
missile in that fashion, there is another effect. Without going
into the
physics (the AIAS has several published papers related to this in
refereed
journals), there is a kind of electrical charge that occurs in the
time-domain. Before your normal EEs foam at the mouth, let me
call your
attention to the various polarizations of the photon in quantum field
theory. One of the polarizations is called the
"time-polarized" or "scalar"
photon. That photon's energy is not oscillating in 3-space at
all.
Instead, it is oscillating in the time-domain. That is physics,
go check it
out. It isn't in normal electrical engineering or radar
engineering or
normal communications theory at all. Many physics professors are
only dimly
aware of it. The AIAS also has papers clearly showing the EM
longitudinal
energy waves and currents in the time domain. So one can
electromagnetically charge (excite) a mass in the time-energy domain
as well
as in the more conventional 3-space energy domain. It's a fact,
but your
radar engineers and EEs do not know it, and very few university
professors
would be aware of it. Nonetheless it is true.

As contained in work we have recently published, with every
longitudinally
polarized EM wave there is an accompanying time-domain
(time-polarized) EM
wave as well, but in 4-space since it is in the time-domain. So
a very
abrupt and powerful strike by longitudinal EM waves is also a very
powerful
and abrupt strike by the accompanying EM wave energy in the time
domain.
The result is to "time-domain" charge (rather instantly) the
struck masses.
Note that time-energy is highly compressed EM spatial energy,
compressed by
the factor c-squared. Hence time-energy has the same energy
density as
mass-energy. A little time-charge has a lot of EM energy in it,
if the
energy is released in expanded spatial energy form, which is what
happens
when time-charges slowly decay. So these
"time-charged" masses then slowly
decay and emit longitudinal EM waves for some time thereafter, as the
"time-charge" slowly decays away over a period of time.

The human body (particularly the cellular regeneration system, which
is
"peculiar electromagnetics" in nature) does use this higher
symmetry kind of
electrodynamics, in cellular control, control of the immune system and
cells, and control of cellular functioning and healing. Exposure
of the
living body to significant LW EM radiation will interfere with these
body
functions. After a bit of time, all sorts of symptoms will
emerge in the
LW-irradiated and exposed bodies: the symptoms include
headaches, nausea,
dizziness, stomach and intestinal difficulties, weakness, loss or
upset of
equilibrium, arthritic symptoms, excess fatigue syndrome, various
chronic
pains and aches, rashes, etc. Fairly significant exposure to LW
EM
radiation over some hours will usually generate long-lasting symptoms
and
even long-lasting debilitation.

Some 60 of the Canadian ground handlers engaged in wreckage
retrieval at
Gander, were exposed to such longitudinal EM emission from the
wreckage.
These handlers came down with the appropriate symptoms, many were
debilitated, and some perhaps long-term debilitated. Check it
out. That
does not and cannot happen in retrieval of normal wreckage with no
excess
longitudinal EM radiation. It cannot happen in retrieval of the
wreckage of
an aircraft struck by a terrorist bomb of normal explosives such as
C-4. It
can only happen where those ground-handlers have significant LW EM
radiation
exposure. Some aggravation by smoke inhalation etc. was also
probably
present.

So try to find an ordinary aircraft wreck where five dozen ground
handlers
all came down with symptoms of excess longitudinal EM wave
irradiation. It
doesn't exist.

Also be advised that most major weapon labs in the world now have at
long
last discovered longitudinal EM waves and related impure longitudinal
EM
waves with some transverse EM wave residues. Such impure
longitudinal EM
waves are called "Undistorted Progressive
Waves", or UPWs for
short. E.g.,
get on the Los Alamos National Laboratory web site, and download some
papers
on "undistorted progressive waves" etc by Rodrigues, Liu,
etc. You may be
surprised to see what astounding characteristics such waves
(longitudinal
waves that are impure and still have some transverse EM wave residues)
exhibit. Such as traveling faster than the speed of light or
slower than
the speed of light.

The continually advancing field of electrodynamics does encompass a
great
number of things that probably are not yet being taught at your
favorite
university! Further, the things taught at university as
"Maxwell's
equations" are not such at all; not a single one of those ever
appeared in
any paper or book by James Clerk Maxwell. Instead, those are
Heaviside's
reinterpretation of a small subset of Maxwell's theory.
Maxwell's actual
theory is some 20 quaternion equations in 20 unknowns. Only a
tiny, highly
restricted subset is available to the electrical engineers, radar
engineers,
communication engineers, etc. Quoting a very fine
electrodynamicist:

"[T]he A field [for the potentials] was banished from playing the
central
role in Maxwell's theory and relegated to being a mathematical (but
not
physical) auxiliary. This banishment took place during the
interpretation
of Maxwell's theory... by Heaviside... and Hertz. The 'Maxwell
theory' and
'Maxwell's equations' we know today are really the interpretation of
Heaviside... Heaviside took the 20 equations of Maxwell and reduced
them to
the four now known as "Maxwell's equations." [Terence W.
Barrett,
"Electromagnetic Phenomena Not Explained by Maxwell's
Equations," A.
Lakhtakia, ed., Essays on the Formal Aspects of Electromagnetics
Theory,
World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 1993, p. 11 and generally
p.
6-86.].

As another good electrodynamicist put it:

"James Clerk Maxwell originally enunciated his theory in 1864 in
a memoir
entitled 'A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field'.
...However, it
was Oliver Heaviside who first expressed them in the form that we know
today
in the Philosophical Magazine, February 1888. The striking proof
of the
importance of Maxwell's theory was given by Heinrich Rudolf Hertz in
1888
when he actually produced electromagnetic waves and effectively
measured
their speed of propagation, which came out equal to light speed in
vacuum.
This directly confirmed Maxwell's hypothesis concerning the existence
of
electromagnetic waves." [Patrick Cornille, "Inhomogeneous
waves and
Maxwell's equations," Essays on the formal Aspects of
Electromagnetic
Theory, Ed. A. Lakhtakia, World Scientific, 1993, p. 138.].

Anyway, perhaps that gives you an inkling of what happened to
"Maxwell's
real theory". Only a small subset is taught in
universities, except in very
few cases. You can do lots of things in Maxwell's quaternion
theory than
you cannot do at all in the highly truncated standard tensor and
vector
Heaviside theory taught at university. Even so, you do not get
the
"infolded" electrodynamics unless you apply Whittaker's
decompositions.
Whittaker's second (1904) paper initiated the branch of
electrodynamics
called superpotential theory. The 1903 paper, which is necessary
in
combination with the 1904 paper to arrive at the "infolded"
electrodynamics,
was resoundingly ignored by almost all electrodynamicists and
physicists,
even to the present day. Those two references are:

E. T. Whittaker, "On the Partial Differential Equations of
Mathematical
Physics," Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903, p. 333-355;
------- "On an
Expression of the Electromagnetic Field Due to Electrons by Means of
Two
Scalar Potential Functions," Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Series 2,
Vol. 1, 1904,
p. 367-372. The latter paper was published in 1904 and orally
delivered in
1903.

We call attention to the fact that there are hundreds of incidents of
the
testing of Russian longitudinal EM wave interferometers worldwide, and
one
can easily gather them from the open literature by their
"signatures".

So I would encourage you to be serious about what has been a deadly
threat
to Canada and to the United States for some decades. And believe
then U.S.
Secretary of Defense Cohen when he confirmed that some very unusual
electromagnetic weapons do exist and are being used against us.

Here's how you initiate a very large earthquake with such
weapons.
Take a
convenient fault zone of set of them. Focus the interferometry
on the fault
zone, in the "diverging" mode, and deposit EM energy there
in the rocks on
both sides, increasing (slowly) the stress in the rocks by the reverse
piezoelectric effect (deposit excess energy, get crystal mechanical
movements). Do it slowly, and the stress will build up to large
pressures
well-above a plate slip minimum energy required. At some point,
the rocks
yield and one or both sides "slip" and move rather sharply,
giving a very
large earthquake in that zone. Do the same thing down in the
earth
(remember, LWs easily penetrate right through the earth and ocean at
will,
and so the "interference zone" focus can be inside the earth
or beneath the
ocean, at will.

Anyway, focus this thing down to where the active part of the
volcano is
still slumbering, down where the hole in the plate has been made.
Keep
increasing the deposition of energy in the magma itself, and
eventually the
increasing pressure from deep within that volcano, underground, will
cause
an eruption. Build the energy slow, and the eruption will likely
be much
larger.

Engineering the weather is duck soup; they tested that over the U.S.
in
1967, and entered upon continuing operations over North America on
July 4,
1976 as a grim kind of KGB "Bicentennial Gift" to the United
States. Here's
how it is done with several interferometers.

First, the interferometers can deliberately make "high pressure
areas" (cool
the air so it shrinks and its "footprint" pressure on the
ground increases
because its density increases) and "low pressure areas" (heat the
air so that
expands and its "footprint" pressure on the ground decreases
because its
density decreases). Well, if one makes the highs and lows where
one wishes
them, and judiciously and somewhat slowly moves them along a given
path,
these highs and lows will entrain the jet streams and thus
"steer" the
weather.

So if you wish a very cold snap or attack, go up into Canada and start
these
actions to steer down some streams that bring some very frigid air.
Establish other highs and lows judiciously to "block" or
"slow" other jet
streams and flows as desired. In this way, one can pull the
"large cold air
masses coming down from Canada" deep into the southern U.S. at
will. They
do it regularly. If you wish an ice storm, add an additional
current of
warm moist air you bring up (steer up by using artificial highs and
lows)
from the ocean. Where they meet, you will get freezing rain,
then sleet,
then severe icing accumulating. This type of attack does rather
large
damage to the struck area.

There are many other things and incidents of use of these weapons that
have
occurred. However, this should give you the gist of what really
happened at
Gander on Dec. 12, 1985.

The "lights in the sky" are often used in an area to
stimulate public
reactions of "UFOs sighted" etc. E.g., check the
sightings of such
surrounding the kill of the TWA-800. Also check the incidents of
deliberate
"balls of light" moved along in the same area a few months
later, so that
airliner crews would spot them and report them. These were
stimuli to see
if the official system recognized what was going on. They
didn't.

Just as the officials up there in Canada did not recognize what went
on in
the kill of the Arrow DC-8 there at Gander.