While many have heard the term “Pizzagate” by now, which began with claims that information found on Anthony Weiner’s lap top revealed the existence of a pedophilia ring. From there it snowballed after Wikileaks released the Podesta emails, where references to food, such as “Hot Dogs,” Pizza,” “Cheese,” and others were claimed to have been “keyword” references to children and sex.

The problem with the PizzaGate phenomena is that there was so much true information mixed in with so much disinformation (most likely by people trying to discredit Alternative Media), that separating the two is, in and of itself, a full time job.

We have good information that very soon credible information will be released which dates all the way back to the Franklin Cover-up, through the Penn State Child Sex Pedophile Scandal, and on to the circle today’s financial and political elite.

President Obama famously said a key element of his strategy is: “Don’t do stupid s—.” Hillary Clinton was unable to learn this simple lesson, despite losing to Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary (and serving in Obama’s Cabinet for four years thereafter). The Clintons, of all people, should have been aware of the challenges of a presidential campaign — yet, they still did an amazing number of stupid and very possible, illegal things.

On November 1, WikiLeaks released an email that revealed one of the most dubious Racketeering schemes ever devised. This scheme was between the Clinton Foundation, the Clinton’s, and Foreign Governments.

In a March 2015 email, Clinton Foundation director of foreign policy Amitabh Desai asked the Clinton campaign whether Bill Clinton could meet with Ukrainian Clinton Foundation billionaire donor Victor Pinchuk. The purpose of the meeting was to use Bill Clinton as a selling point to other Western leaders, so that Pinchuk could make a statement in opposition to Russian Leader Vladimir Putin.

Every four years, Americans are reminded how little they really know about their Electoral College system. Is it really possible for a candidate to win the most votes but still lose the presidency? (Ask Al Gore.) Can close elections end up in court? (Again, talk to Al.) And is it really possible that nobody emerges as the winner? That last question comes with an added twist this year.

1. How could it be that nobody wins?

To win, a candidate needs at least 270 electoral votes, a majority of the 538 that are divided among the 50 states and the District of Columbia. A 269-269 tie is mathematically possible, though it’s never happened. This year there’s another long-shot possibility. An independent protest candidate, Evan McMullin, is in striking rangeto win his home state of Utah and its six electoral votes, which otherwise would be expected to go the Republican, Donald Trump. That raises, at least slightly, the possibility that neither Trump nor Democrat Hillary Clinton amasses the needed 270 electoral votes.

The 2016 presidential election, already one of the wildest in American history, has been rocked by the announcement that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while Secretary of State.

Apparently while investigating disgraced ex-Congressman Anthony Weiner’s transmission of sexually explicit images to a fifteen-year-old girl, the FBI discovered more emails relevant to Hillary Clinton’s own infamous case.
At the time, Weiner was married to Huma Abedin, Clinton’s personal aide, perhaps best known for her alleged family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. The emails appear to have been found on a computer used by both Abedin and Weiner.

Where all this goes from here remains unclear. That said, in the interest of helping a scandal-weary electorate put these new developments in context, shall we review a few things?

I have worked in national security my entire life. Most of that has been in the intelligence community surrounded by classified information. For twenty years, I worked undercover in the Central Intelligence Agency, recruiting sources, producing intelligence and running operations. I have a pretty concrete understanding of how classified information is handled and how government communications systems work.

To understand how Radical Islam can immigrate into the U.S. without a man crossing the border, lets go back…way back.

In 1974, in the middle of a Michael Parkinson interview, Muhammad Ali decided to dispense with all the safe conventions of chat show etiquette.
“You say I got white friends,” he declared, “I say they are associates.”

When his host dared to suggest that the boxer’s trainer of 14 years standing, Angelo Dundee, might be a friend, Ali insisted, gruffly: “He is an associate.”
Within seconds, with Parkinson failing to get a word in edgeways, Ali had provided a detailed account of his reasoning.

“Elijah Muhammad,” he told the TV viewers “Is the one who preached that the white man of America, number one, is the Devil!”

In 1941 America began its efforts to construct an atomic bomb – an endeavor that was code-named the Manhattan Project. By the summer of 1945, researchers were ready to test their product, and on July 16, 1945, the first atomic bomb was detonated. The blinding flash was visible from up to 200 miles away, and nearly every window within 100 miles was blown out.

Chemtrails have not been quite so dynamic , but are nonetheless very noticeable. It doesn’t matter where you are, that familiar crisscrossing pattern littering otherwise-blue skies seems to be without end.

While the immediate effects of the atomic bomb and chemtrails couldn’t seem to be more different, they do share one thing: government secrecy. When the first atomic bomb was detonated in New Mexico a coverup story was quickly released. Our government lied to its own people, claiming that the massive explosion they’d borne witness to was actually the result of a large ammunition dump exploding in the desert.

Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Obesity – America was scammed into believing the reports. And the Government sat quietly by and let it happen.
In the 1960s, the sugar industry funded research that downplayed the risks of sugar and highlighted the hazards of fat

Julian Assange intimated that a recently murdered Democratic National Committee staffer may have leaked sensitive, troubling emails to him rather than the Russians, and then paid for it with his life.

The staffer, Seth Conrad Rich, 27, was a data analyst for the DNC. Early on the morning of July 8, he was shot and killed in what police have described as a robbery attempt.
There’s just one problem with that: Rich was just shot and killed; he wasn’t robbed.