So as unlikely a place as the campsite may seem, let it be investigated. And here's hoping it is finally the needle in the haystack that points them to their little girl.

Well, on the new photograph she looks about 12 and even at nine years old, the phrase 'little girl' is redundant. Certainly the 9 year old would think so. IMO most people are still looking for the 2.5 year old of the poster - mass hypnotism not having worn off yet.

@aiyoyo wrote:It's disgusting they exposed the man and his family to risk by printing his name. If I were him I will sue the mccanns. Or, at least speak to the press, demand an apology, and made it known that what they did was disgusting putting innocent people at risk over a mystery of a missing child the parents alleged was abducted.

I would ask how can it be practical or lawful for the mccanns to demand that the public report and inconvenience the public when they themselves didnt co-operate with the Police to get themselves eliminated.

I would want the papers to ask the mccanns - Why didnt kate answer 48 questions, except one, in reply that she knew tat by not answering she is hindering the investigation?Why did they and friends impose conditions for the re-enactment> Why they u-turn on the poly gragh test - ie why did they say they will take the test only to place conditions on it?

Why do the impose so many conditions on burden of proof to prove themselves innocent? Surely the onus is on them to prove themselves innocent by getting themselves eliminated; while the onus for the Police is to find out what really happened to Madeleine.

Most of all, I would demand that the papers that splashed my name for the whole world to read with the insinuation of "Paedophile" to ask the mccanns:How can they realistically (or lawfully) expect the Public to inconvenience everyone with a blond child Maddie's age and put innocent people at risk. The very least they should do is to get themselves eliminated out of the equation, only when the Police announced they are eliminated of involvement (not spin eliminated by their mouthpiece) but eliminated by the Police announcing it publicly, then it is fair to ask the public to look out.

Of course we can expect the Papers to print they were "cleared" ..blah blah blah...the ususal gibberish. Lastly I would want the press to ask them : why didn't they request for the case to be reopened - it costs only a stamp .

Fully agree, aiyoyo. Interesting that even the German tabloid Bild did not publish the man's full name (they referred to him as 'M. Karsten').

Press Complaints Commission - Editors' Code of Practice states

3 Privacy

i) Everyone is entitled to respect for his or her private and family life, home, health and correspondence, including digital communications.

ii) Editors will be expected to justify intrusions into any individual's private life without consent. Account will be taken of the complainant's own public disclosures of information.

iii) It is unacceptable to photograph individuals in private places without their consent.

Note - Private places are public or private property where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Media ethics and standards in the UK have sadly sunk to an abysmal level. But frankly what can we expect when they are being courted and even manipulated by the very authorities such as the SY and the Downing Street that ought to be upholding their own accountability and high standards but clearly failing to do so. How very depressing.

I read on the other site that it was Rebekah Brooks who leaned on Cameron to do the review. .Would the real reason for the sudden closure of NOTW be more than hacking related? I remember RB told staff there were more damaging stuff to come when they had to shut down. To think that of all people the mccanns, the most high profile couple in a century or more, were not hacked by NI something very sinister must either be covered up or unearthed by NI.

Either way, they were in it to sensationalize for profit margins. Also, they must have realized they were conned by the mccanns but they were in it so deep that they cant u-turn without serious further criminality implications for Murdoch and Brooks,

So as unlikely a place as the campsite may seem, let it be investigated. And here's hoping it is finally the needle in the haystack that points them to their little girl.

Well, on the new photograph she looks about 12 and even at nine years old, the phrase 'little girl' is redundant. Certainly the 9 year old would think so. IMO most people are still looking for the 2.5 year old of the poster - mass hypnotism not having worn off yet.

When the mccanns use abduction as a tool for their monetary gain they knew that marketing Madeleine was the perfect strategy because the continent is full of little blond girls and the possibility of good hearted people reporting in sighting is endless and infinite.

What is odd is that no sighting is ever reported in the UK even though UK is also full of little blond girls. If the abductor is a daring travelling vagabond then border is not a deterrent surely? Also what is so very odd about these sightings is that the sighters always come forward belatedly. This latest one, the Brit woman, even allowed her photo to be splashed on the papers. If she's not bogus then she is an attention seeker no doubt about it. After all how many decent people would want their face splash in the papers over a sighting ?

aiyoyo wrote:After all how many decent people would want their face splash in the papers over a sighting ?

Absolutely spot on. That they (collectively) should encourage these feeble-minded attention seekers to hit tabloid headlines week after week is beyond contempt. They are all cashing in from this immoral enterprise: the McCanns and their cronies, tabloid newspapers, television.

So far I have found no convincing explanation for the SY's involvement in this though. Surely, they cannot be making themselves richer by wasting tax payers' money. Then why? Because of their recent 'appeal', more and more bogus sightings will be reported while any half decent man or woman with some real clue would be discouraged from approaching them, precisely for the fear of having their full name/face/address/telephone number/medial history splashed in the papers.

I have always believed that sooner or later one of the T7 will break ranks and come clean, or give enough hint of evidence that can lead us to the truth. But this present media hype is certainly not helping to sever the weakest link either.

____________________There is a taint of death, a flavour of mortality in lies...Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad

No "sightings" of Madeleine ever reported in the UK? Yes, that´s odd but I guess Kate&Gerry has the perfect answer to that question: The abductor would NEVER ever dare to take her cross the border to the United McCanndom, Madeleines country of origin. But on the other hand, Kate says in a swedish interview(with Annika Widegren on Tv4play) that she hopes Madeleine is being taken care of and that she is happy, whoever she is with. So maybe the abductor doesn´t have to fear anything after all, as long as he takes good care of their daughter - and makes her happy...? Kate adds that it would be better if Madeleine was with her family, though.

@Mariita wrote:No "sightings" of Madeleine ever reported in the UK? Yes, that´s odd but I guess Kate&Gerry has the perfect answer to that question: The abductor would NEVER ever dare to take her cross the border to the United McCanndom, Madeleines country of origin. But on the other hand, Kate says in a swedish interview(with Annika Widegren on Tv4play) that she hopes Madeleine is being taken care of and that she is happy, whoever she is with. So maybe the abductor doesn´t have to fear anything after all, as long as he takes good care of their daughter - and makes her happy...? Kate adds that it would be better if Madeleine was with her family, though.

Yes there were sightings in the UK, I remember this one very well............

Is Madeleine in Britain? Dorset councillor claims: 'She came to my house with a Portuguese couple'

[snipped]Kate and Gerry McCann face yet another potential disappointment after reports emerged last night that Madeleine McCann has been spotted in Britain.

Detectives are said to be launching a major inquiry into the claim that the missing four-year-old was seen by a man in Dorset.

Retired civil servant Alan Cameron alerted police after a Portuguese couple turned up at his home in the village of Stratton

Mr Cameron, 66, told the Sunday Express: "They knocked on my door and said they had come to buy the garden furniture I'd put on sale in a local ad."

"Straight away they struck me as odd. The woman said she was Italian but they were speaking fluent Portuguese.

"The man had a few days' growth on his face and was wearing filthy clothes. He told me they ran a language centre in Weymouth but then the woman hit him and told him to be quiet."

Ok, I read a post above where it was claimed that no sightings had been reported in the UK... Thinking more about it, it would have been REALLY odd if nothing had come up in the UK! But if that would have been the case, my imaginary answer of the McCanns wouldn´t be so wrong, maybe

So as unlikely a place as the campsite may seem, let it be investigated. And here's hoping it is finally the needle in the haystack that points them to their little girl.

Well, on the new photograph she looks about 12 and even at nine years old, the phrase 'little girl' is redundant. Certainly the 9 year old would think so. IMO most people are still looking for the 2.5 year old of the poster - mass hypnotism not having worn off yet.

When the mccanns use abduction as a tool for their monetary gain they knew that marketing Madeleine was the perfect strategy because the continent is full of little blond girls and the possibility of good hearted people reporting in sighting is endless and infinite.

What is odd is that no sighting is ever reported in the UK even though UK is also full of little blond girls. If the abductor is a daring travelling vagabond then border is not a deterrent surely? Also what is so very odd about these sightings is that the sighters always come forward belatedly. This latest one, the Brit woman, even allowed her photo to be splashed on the papers. If she's not bogus then she is an attention seeker no doubt about it. After all how many decent people would want their face splash in the papers over a sighting ?

The thing is though there have been so many appeals for more information so why has this women only surfaced now? I think this is a total setup by a certain party. It was done just to get maddy back in the news. No one with half a brain surely would think this girl was snatched then taken on holiday 2 hours away from whence she came, bloody madness.

The child is never going to be found on holiday now is she.

I would think the only time she went anywhere was probably in a blue tennis bag or similar and if she was abducted that is how the abducted would have removed her, there is no way anyone would just carry out a child at a busy time in their arms no way. Poor little mite. Whatever happened to her would not have been a good thing and why her parents if they are innocent cant see that then well what can I say. This child if taken by a pedophile would be in hell like so many others before her.

That poor family from the camp site must be feeling really bad and I bet you a tenner this girl looked nothing like Maddy apart from being blonde.

Madness and stupidity rules in this case and it started with the idiots the metodo 3 who were seen to carry the famous cuddle cat in images that still make me cringe.

Eddie and Keela alerted to items and places concerned with the McCanns - and importantly to no other items or places.

According to Eddie and Keela, the body of Madeleine McCann lay lifeless behind the sofa in Apartment 5a, clinging to the only thing from which she could derive any comfort; a soft toy called 'Cuddle cat'.

Former Met Police Chief Lord Stevens:"There was no hard evidence because of the sheer inadequacy of the Portuguese investigation. There's absolutely no chance the parents of Madeleine McCann would be charged with her murder in this country. I've been a detective at the most senior level for 30 years and have never seen such a witch-hunt, or one based on such flimsy evidence."

Ch Insp Tavares de Almeida: "Kate and Gerald McCann are involved in the concealment of the cadaver of their daughter Madeleine McCann. From what has been established up to now, everything indicates that the McCann couple, in self-defence, doesn't want to deliver the cadaver immediately and voluntarily."

Kate's book 'madeleine', Page 219: "Did they really believe that a dog could smell the 'odour of death' three months later from a body that had been so swiftly removed?"

After forensic analysis of the 'Last Photo' there is little doubt now that the pool photo CANNOT POSSIBLY have been taken on the Thursday 3rd May, but most likely on the Sunday 29th April. So, where was Madeleine at lunchtime on Thursday? We don't know, but we can begin to "purport theories" based both on strong evidence, and lack of evidence.

Dr Gonçalo Amaral, retired PJ Coordinator: "The English can always present the conclusions to which they themselves arrived in 2007. Because they know, they have the evidence of what happened, they don't need to investigate anything. When MI5 opens their files, then we will know the truth."

Ex-Met DCI Colin Sutton: "The most likely scenario is that Madeleine was stolen to order by slave traders and smuggled into Africa for a rich family who wanted a white child."

Ex-Met DCI Andy Redwood had a "revelation moment" on BBC1's Crimewatch on 14th October 2013 when he announced that Operation Grange had eliminated the Tanner sighting - which opened up the 'window' of opportunity', in accordance with their remit, to allow the staged abduction to happen.

Tracey Kandohla: "A McCann pal told The Sun Online: "Some of the savings have been siphoned off from the Find Maddie Fund into a fixed asset account, which financial experts have advised them to do. It can be used for purchases like buying a house or building equipment."

Gerry McCann called for an example to be made of 'trolls'. SKY reporter Martin Brunt doorstepped Brenda Leyland on 2 October 2014 after a 'Dossier' was handed in to Police by McCann supporters. She was then found dead in a Leicester hotel room the next day. Brenda paid the price.