Wednesday, a day after British Parliament broke for a long summer recess, a series of documents relating to allegations of an historical child and sex abuse ring with links to Westminster and the establishment it was publicly revealed they had been miraculously located.

Tuesday night Sky News, which had been pushing the government on the matter for some time, was finally successful.

When you look at what the documents are likely to allege and who may be involved suspicions of a cover-up, especially until some of those involved shuffled of this mortal coil, will fail to subside.

The Daily Mirror Wednesday named "Margaret Thatcher's former parliamentary secretary the late Sir Peter Morrison, former Home Secretary Sir Leon Brittan, former diplomat the late Sir Peter Hayman and former minister the late Sir William van Straubenzee" as involved but they are all deceased.

Although some of the allegations date back many years how many others still living were involved? How deep did the abuse run into the British Establishment? Looking at some of the names bandied about on social media this week it could have run very deep.

Looking at those accused including those from the world of celebrity in a separate investigation what stands out is all these men had been 'honoured' in the Queen's honour lists of various years.

Those who are honoured are promoted in part by the PM and government of the day.

With allegations that the late Margaret Thatcher was well aware of sleaze at Westminster why would she recommend any of these vile men received a royal honour?

The contents of the documents are not public knowledge at this time but will be useful for the CSA inquiry if not vital.

Since revelations in January Sky News has pushed for the release of 'missing files'.

It came after the Government released the details in January of a file prepared for Mrs Thatcher's office on the ‘unnatural sexual’ behaviour of one of the men Sir Peter Hayman. The new batch of file names reveal there were further Government papers relating to the former MI6 man and career diplomat. The content of the papers have not been revealed, however. Sky News said the documents have been shared with the police and will be passed to the Child Abuse Inquiry led by Justice Lowell Goddard. Daily Mirror

Cameron is likely to call those who question the timing of the release of these documents as 'conspiracy theorists' but it is telling. How come these documents could not be found until after the 2015 General Election? How come they were lost until after Leon Brittan died in late January?

MPs it seems also thought the 11th hour release of the papers was 'fishy'.

The Daily Mirror reports "There was fury from MPs that ministers had revealed the information on the day after the Commons rose for its summer break. Labour MP Tom Watson, who has campaigned against child abuse, accused the Government of "sneaking out" the documents during the parliament recess. This meant MPs could not "scrutinise properly" the papers nor "hold ministers to account," he said. "They suggest allegations were made around child abuse in the mid 1980s involving politicians and for whatever reason the security services and police failed to follow through these allegations," he said. "Three years ago no one would have believed that very powerful people could have abused people and the agencies of the state covered them up to protect their reputations.Why did Home Secretary Theresa May in 2014 appoint two successive women with strong links to the establishment to chair the CSA inquiry?

Delays, disbelief and disrespect for the survivors from those in power and it is fair to conclude many knew what had really happened.

The Westminster paedo ring 'conspiracy' is a myth and it is way past time justice was served.

In late June we reported "As allegations of child and sex abuse in the UK, that date back many years, rumble on here at NEWTEKNEWS we are looking back at some of the background to this continuing story as the 'survivors' are left still yearning for justice."

July 13: Op-Ed: July 9 we reported that a long delayed inquiry into child sex abuse in the UK had finally got underway.

Justice Lowell Goddard, 66, the third person appointed to chair the inquiry following the resignations of Baroness Sloss and Fiona Woolf, in opening the inquiry said it may last until 2020.

We wondered what Goddard would be getting paid for her role as chair asking part cynically and part jokingly what she was getting paid and whether it would be lucrative for her to hold a long inquiry.

Monday her pay for undertaking the role has been made public.

Goddard will receive an annual salary of £360,000, with an additional an annual rental allowance of £110,000 and £12,000 a year to cover utilities. As the BBC reports "The Home Office will also cover the cost of four return flights from the UK to the judge's native New Zealand." The flight cost includes her husband and there is provision for immediate family members. Her pay deal is worth £480,000 a year plus without those flights.

Of course she would never be able to fund the flights herself out of a measly £360,000 a year.

While it is an important inquiry and vital that justice is finally served the figures are staggering.

Was it so difficult to find a truly independent British person qualified to chair the inquiry? Did Home Secretary Theresa May set this pay deal?

But of course Goddard's pay is just the tip of the financial iceberg. With an estimated cost of £17.9m cost for one year:

Panel members will receive £565 a day, with staffing costs accounting for 41% of the overall budget. Costs relating to the set-up and running of offices across England and Wales make up 21% of the budget, while operational costs, such as safeguarding support, account for 17% of the budget.

UK Home Secretary Theresa May has approved the budget of £17.9m for 2015/16. Where do they get these figures from?

The inquiry was set to run from April 2015 until December 2018 but can be extended if necessary by mutual agreement.

The costs are staggering but what about the human cost of our failed justice system to the survivors of abuse?

Op-Ed: In April the CPS, Crown Prosecution Service of the UK announced Lord Greville Janner, 86, a high-profile Labour peer, would not face sex abuse allegations dating back to the 1970's and 1980's due to his advanced dementia.

Monday that decision was overturned following a campaign for justice.

[Friday August 7, court proceedings against Janner begin]

The CPS website explains "In May, six of the complainants in this case requested a formal Right to Review, and at the DPP’s request, David Perry QC was instructed to provide advice to inform the CPS review of the decision."

The independent review, conducted by David Perry QC, "concluded that it was in the public interest to bring proceedings [against Janner] before a criminal court" reports the Guardian.That led to Monday's U Turn.

But the trial will not be straightforward and may not even lead to an appropriate sentence if Janner is found guilty.

He is likely to be found "unfit to plead and therefore not fit to instruct his legal team and not fit to challenge or give evidence in a trial. Therefore the most likely outcome of a “trial of the facts” would be an absolute discharge, which is neither punishment nor conviction." But with each time delay that outcome became more likely. One outcome if the trial concludes he is guilty surely must be the removal of his title as in the case of Sir Jimmy Savile and others.

In April Saunders was strongly advised to authorise the prosecution of Janner but ignored requests including those from alleged victims.

The case against Janner will commence August 7 with a hearing at Westminster magistrates court.

The trial will cover 22 offences allegedly committed in the 1960s, 70s and 80s.

The Director of public prosecutions, Alison Saunders, decision not to prosecute Janner has led to calls for her to resign following today's U Turn.

Saunders is the first DPP to have a major decision reviewed and overturned but it is not the first time her decisions have been criticised.

Speaking on Channel 4's evening news program Saunders explained her position defending other decisions she has made that have not been universally approved.

But perhaps a Guardian editorial hits the nail on the head in a piece titled "The Guardian view on Alison Saunders: don’t sack her, back her" which rightly points out "The child abuse allegations against Lord Janner should have been prosecuted a decade ago. It’s too late now." While that may be true what about the victims? The allegations against Janner have been part of three failed police prosecutions says the Guardian, but this is the first time they have been heard in a court of law.

CPSIn 2014 it was revealed that police had compiled a dossier holding more than 20 allegations against Janner; it was also revealed that a police officer was ordered not to search Janner's home.In a statement in April Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said there was enough evidence to charge Janner with:

Fourteen indecent assaults on a male under 16 between 1969 and 1988

Two indecent assaults between 1984 and 1988

Four counts of buggery of a male under 16 between 1972 and 1987

Two counts of buggery between 1977 and 1988

Last year a former detective sergeant with Leicestershire Police, Mick Creedon - now chief constable of Derbyshire Police - told a national newspaper that in 1989 he was ordered not to arrest Lord Janner and not to search his home. So why has Janner been protected for so long?

The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Alison Saunders will now bring criminal proceedings against Greville Janner for child sex offences. This follows a review of the case under the recently introduced CPS Victims’ Right to Review scheme, which allows victims to have their cases looked at again, no matter who in the CPS made the original decision not to prosecute. In the past year the scheme has meant that more than 200 prosecutions have been brought that would not have been brought otherwise.

Op-Ed: As allegations of child and sex abuse, that date back many years, go unpunished here at NEWTEKNEWS we are looking back at some of the background to this story as the 'survivors' are left to still yearn for justice.

This is part three of a series of abuse reports posted on our previous website. Part one can befound here and part two here.

December 2014- Homicide links to paedo ring but Cameron wants to move on

There are historic unresolved allegations regarding child sex abuse in the UK with possible links to high-office. Similar allegations relating to some celebrities have resulted in court cases and jail. Some of those investigations are on going but Friday PM David Cameron is accused of preferring that we all move on from allegations involving the establishment.

Weeks ago the media reported a possible homicide linked to the case. Thursday there were reports that police are investigation three possible homicides.The Guardian reported "Claims that boys were murdered by VIP sex ring are credible and true - police".

The victims of child abuse, now all adults, deserve justice and need closure but will they get it?

Home Secretary Theresa May has made a stab at appointing an independent chair person to head an inquiry. Both had tight links to the establishment and ultimately they resigned. For now at least the inquiry is stalled.

Police were quick to name any celebrity suspects, their reasoning being it would help other victims have the confidence to come forward.

In the case of an alleged high-profile paedophile ring with links to government no suspect has been named.

Instead police have ensured suspects remain unknown to the public.

News Friday that "An MP tells Sky News that David Cameron "wants to move on" from allegations of sexual abuse involving political figures" is disconcerting. It means he does not care about the victims or justice. It also indicates he will not go the extra mile to get the inquiry underway.

Instead it could end up stalled until after the May 2015 General Election. [Which is exactly what has happened]

Simon Danczuk, an "MP leading the campaign to uncover allegations of sexual abuse involving political figures in the 1980s has accused David Cameron of being "dismissive" of the issue; he believes there is a "schism" in the Cabinet over the issue". He said: "I think the Prime Minister, and I don't say this lightly, but I think the Prime Minister is quite dismissive of the issue and wants to move on from it. "Whereas the Home Secretary Theresa May, I think, is very serious about wanting to pursue this. She's right to say we're talking about the tip on the iceberg. "There's absolutely no doubt about it that there were politicians and other people in power co-operating and assisting each other in the abuse of children, and that's going to come out and there's no doubt about that.The allegations reportedly involve high-profile members of the British establishment.

The fact that Cameron appears dismissive indicates that those people were not Labour politicians but rather had links to the Tories.

Danczuk insists it is a big issue in terms of the number of suspects and victims but also "who" were the abusers.

The establishment may not want the truth to emerge but it must. If it involves murder heads must roll.

This is part two of a series of abuse reports. Part one can be found here.

January 2014 - The latest revelations about former UK celebrity, the late Jimmy Savile, is that the extent of his abuse is worse than originally reported and, shockingly, up to a thousand cases of abuse by him took place on BBC premises.The Guardian reports that the BBC will be plunged into crisis when a report of abuse is published next week. The review reportedly uncovered up to a thousand incidents of abuse of both girls and boys in BBC studio changing rooms. More shocking is the allegation that some BBC staff routinely turned a blind-eye to the abuse.The report by Dame Janet Smith, a former court of appeal judge, follows a review and its conclusions are that "the true number of victims of Savile's sexual proclivities may never be known but that his behaviour had been recognised by BBC executives who took no action."Jimmy Savile was a well-known entertainer in the UK. A DJ he was a firm friend of the late PM Margaret Thatcher and worked at hospitals in the UK in charitable roles. Now we all know that those charitable roles were anything but philanthropic. They were used as easy access to vulnerable individuals and to satisfy his abusive nature.

Sadly Savile will never be found guilty of any crime and so in death must be classed as 'innocent'. However, such is the extent of the abuse and evidence there is no doubt of guilt. There may be the odd false flag in there but the evidence shows guilt, although that will never be shown in a court of law.

Savile was a predator and paedophile and the fact that was not 'revealed' until after his death is shameful. We now know that there were plenty of allegations made against him during his life but they were never fully investigated by police. No charges were ever made.

Operation Yewtree, launched following Savile's death, is slowly but surely bringing other celebrity abusers to justice.

The 60s was a very different era but that does not excuse the behaviour of abusers. It may in some way explain why some sexual abuse cases were buried or not reported.

For a young woman in the 60s accusing a famous personality of sexual abuse would have been daring. The accuser would not have received anonymity and every aspect of her sex-life would have been scrutinised. Ultimately she could have almost been the person on trial. Little wonder then that some victims chose to keep the abuse secret.

Why some victims waited more than 40 years to report the abuse is baffling but they will have their reasons.

Not all abuse though is historical. As the trials of celebrities accused of abuse continue we are learning that some have allegedly continued their cycle of abuse.

This is part one of a mini series of reports and acts as an introduction to Britian's failure to adress allegations of historical abuse which has accusations that hit into the heart of Westminster. Part two can be found here.

Op-Ed: Allegations of high-profile historical child and sex abuse have dogged the UK since the death on celebrity Jimmy Savile in 2011. For the survivors of the abuse their lives have been turned upside down with no justice in sight.

As many of the men accused of being part of the abuse are already old men time is short but the British government continues to drag its heels when it comes to accusations of abuse by those with links to the establishment.

This week Simon Danczuk, Labour MP for Rochdale, raised the question of one accused peer Lord Greville Janner in parliament.

Danczuk has been one of the few MPs prepared to seek justice for survivors of historical child sex abuse. In April the CPS, Crown Prosecution Service of the UK announced Lord Janner would not face sex abuse allegations dating back to the 1970's and 1980's due to his advanced dementia.

But there have been many years of good health when the allegations could and should have been investigated.

With allegations of historical and shameful child sex abuse back making headlines in the UK this report will be the first in a series.

Most of the reports will have been posted previously on our former website but it is vital they are moved here in order that they receive the necessary attention.

People not directly or indirectly affected by child and sex abuse by high-profile celebrities or members of the establishment were by and large ignorant of the abuse.

Support NEWTEK - Like what we do here at NEWTEK? If so, you should consider supporting us…Running a news based website is fun, time consuming and can be costly. If you would like to help the site keep afloat please use the donate button​