Extract of sample "Contract law- problem question"

Download file to see previous pages
(Thomas v. Thomas)2
The position in respect of existing obligations under a contract and whether they can act as good consideration will now be discussed. One of situation is the one where variation of existing obligations under a contract between the parties occurs.The principle has been modified but the extent to which such modification applies remains unclear. The long established principle in respect of variation of terms and promises in that respect was that of Stilk v. Myrick3whereby it was a long accepted principle that if there was an existing contractual obligation it could never be relied upon that is it could not as good consideration for a fresh promise with the person to whom the existing obligation was owed..
The decision of Stilk and it being good law is doubtful after the case of Williams v Roffey Brothers4the facts of the case were that carpenters, plaintiff, while doing their work, asked the defendants for additional amount of money to finish the work even though they were no doing anything more than what they were already obliged to do. After completion of the work the defendants refused to pay the plaintiff. The main argument that was put forward was that there had been no consideration for the defendants’ promise to pay the additional amount and the decision of Stilk and its application would lead to the promise being construed unenforceable. However, the Court of Appeal found that that plaintiff’ could recover the promised payments for completion of work of the flats, the Court gave a broader meaning to consideration than what had been previously given. The reasoning of Glidewell LJ in particular referred to the point of ‘practical benefits’ which were likely to have accrued to the defendants as a result of them paying the additional promised amount of money, these were that such a promise ensure that the plaintiffs stayed and continued work thus the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Contract law- problem question

...? ContractLaw Introduction O’Brien, the owner of a book salon wanted to sell a signed copy of Orwell’s 1984. In this regard, he placed an advertisement in the shop window stating that it was a rare and special offer of Orwell’s monumental book. He displayed the book in a cabinet with a price sticker that wrongly stated the price as ?500. For advising O’Brien regarding his obligation towards Julia, Parsons and Winston, the following issues have to be discussed. An offer indicates willingness to form a contract on the basis of certain terms, and with the intention that it should be legally binding on being accepted (Barry, 1992, p. 14). The acceptance of an offer results in a valid...

...?England ContractLaw Module Module Number: Academic Year: Seminar Essay Question: Legal Advice on Ryan v IndyBooks Number: Ryan v IndyBooks Limited Ryan v IndyBooks Limited is an example of a current contractlaw cases involving the use of modern technology tools. There are a number of issues arising in this case as follows: whether; email communications and ignorance of terms of contract by a party voids an agreement; either party breached the contract – Lily by withdrawing her membership fee and IndyBooks by poor site maintenance and eventual withholding of Lily’s monthly earnings; Ryan has any basis to claim breach of...

...Elaine v Kramer The main issue in the given situation is whether there was a valid and enforceable contract between Elaine and Kramer. In common law, there are three key elements to the creation of a contract: an agreement (consisting of offer and acceptance), a consideration, and an intention to create legal relations.
In the given situation, the issue is whether the parties (Elaine and Kramer) have reached an agreement Specifically, has Elaine made a properly constituted offer and validly accepted by Kramer The offer, made by the offeror to the offeree, is the the statement of a willingness to be bound on certain specified terms. The offer may be oral, written or implied from conduct....

...that there was an offer and an acceptance. The question remains whether there was consideration.
The general rule is that there has to be reciprocity between the two contracting parties i.e. that a promise should not be able to get anything unless he gives or promises to give something in return to the promisor [Curie v. Misa (1875)].
In our situation, in the agreement between SE and Jayne, SE promised to give 4,000 and in return Jayne attended the training conference. There is however, the issue of the consideration being adequate and whether performance of contractual duties could form sufficient consideration. In the case of the adequacy of the consideration, the law is quite...

...Topic: ContractLawProblem Scenario Language Style: English UK Grade: 1st Pages: 8 Answer: This question raises some issues from contract of illegality, unconscionable conduct, undue influence, economic duress and misrepresentation. Here the main function will be to advise Clarence and Ginger whether they have claim/claims for damages arising out of the above scenario, and if so, what the likely outcome of such claim/claims is likely to be.
Here Seamus had mortgaged Ginger's property. This mortgage can be set aside or the terms modified because here is evidence of undue influence or misrepresentation. A borrower can be pressurized by the lender in such a way that the transaction that he enters is not from his own free... .
In order to...

...﻿ContractLaw Assignment
1. Introduction
A contract according to English and common law is a legal binding containing exchange of promises between the parties involved. The law will enforce the contract if any of the parties breach the contract. The breach of the contract can be recognised by the law and the remedies were provided in the law to make up the loss for the victim. The contractlaw can be classied as civil law and law of obligations. The most important features in the contract...

...ContractLawProblem Joint and Several Liability Jack, an employee of Karen’s for five years, entered into a contract with the Karen’s bank to allow his flat to be used as security against the company’s overdraft. The business’s fortunes did not improve. The business failed and the bank is seeking possession of Jack’s flat’s to reclaim the £500,000 due to them from Karen’s company. The purpose of this report is to study the case and advise Jack regarding as to the possibility of him avoiding the consequences of the contract he had with the bank. Having researched the facts of the case presented we find that, subject to certain reservations, there are...

...﻿ContractlawProblemQuestion - Breach of Contract
Peter wishes to demand specific performance of the contract between him and David regarding the house as he intends to live, at the very least, the stipulated 10 years of the contract. In doing so, Peter needs to affirm the contract exercising his right of election as a result of the breach of contract, in order to successfully argue the remedy of specific performance.
The Breach of Contract
Peter needs to show that David is in breach of contract since he has performed his obligations defectively. David...

...contractual relationship2. Generally the contractlaw is defined as an agreement that creates obligation enforceable by law. This obligation is based upon the mutual acceptance, consideration, legality and capacity to perform.
In this process of conformity, fulfilment and binding, there may arise number of problems if in case contract is not implemented properly or if one party rejects to perform according to the obligations. Thousands of contracts are agreed upon and signed in the world every day and most of them are not performed in their full essence according to the terms3. Whilst many of them are resolved by negotiations and...

.... From this perspective, the willing buyer-seller technique relies on participant’s ability to come to an agreement on which method to apprehend a decision.
When a debtor makes partial payment to a creditor, who has the right to end the agreement? In an event that both decide to settle before completion of the contract, who takes responsibility? The belief that the law binds a promisor to his promises raises many questions on the boundary of such aptitudes. Agreements are very important; nevertheless, the main question remains how to address disputes in contracts2. According to promissory estoppel, any creditor who formally or informally notifies a debtor of forgiving a...

7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

sponsored ads

Save Your Time for More Important Things

Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Contract law- problem question"
with a personal 20% discount.