What about a born child? Does a 1-month old baby have a right to life?

NOT if the satanic liberal have their way.Actually the american Darwinists have purposed abortion up to 28 days old after babies are born. If you dont
like the eyecolor or what not you have 28 days to kill your child. Thats what the scientist say. Its just an animal with no rights.

First off, as a Liberal, I find your immediate classification of "liberals" as Satanic to be insulting and meant solely to antagonize people. It's
disgusting and a big part of why so many intellectuals, Liberals, and others whose reality is based on fact and evidence have turned their backs on
Christianity. This isn't the 13th Century, it's the 21st. Time for Mankind to grow up.

Second, who the heck is saying people should have the right to kill babies up to 28 days after birth?? That's an awfully big claim to make.
I have NEVER heard this from ANYONE, which leads me to think either A) You're making the whole thing up or B) The person you're quoting made it up
and you lacked the intellectual curiosity to look into it for yourself.

I'm calling you out. First, I want an answer to my earlier post, do you intend to take personal responsibility for your claims about this "Secret
Satanic Warehouse", investigate the truth of this claim, post proof of it, and if true, take responsibility for putting an end to it in the quickest,
most efficient manner possible? Are you willing to martyr yourself for this belief?

Second, I want links, audio, video, ANY evidence to back up this claim about "post-birth abortion". I want the sources.

And as for this:

And it it murder everyday day of the week every hour another baby is scrificed to Satan and Molech in the name of Black magic masquarding as
medical science.

You have essentially smeared the entire medical profession and scientific community in one fell swoop with a claim more akin to the Inquisition than
an educated human being in a modern society. You should be ashamed of yourself, not just for spewing such garbage, but also for failing to use the
intellect your God supposedly gave you.

You've made absolutely outrageous claims. It's time to put up or shut up. The Gauntlet has been thrown. Post your proof or find yourself
proven as delusional, a hoaxer, or both.

that 'Personhood' ammendment in Colorado is really a round about way
for the illuminati puppetmasters to add to the number of the human slaves to service these elites.
the Christians and other do-gooder, idealist, altruists are being duped again...
For years now, the GMO food chain, and the gene-manipulators have been on a program to corrupt the human species, and this seeming 'good' and
conscientious ammendment has the intention of creating more disposable organ donors, and more human fodder for the war machine.

Molech, has moved on to the nuclear arena...which is equivelent to 'Cosmic Fire', (not just the old worl, consuming fire of the furnace)
Molech now derives sacrifice from the DU (depleted Uranium) fire, from the victimization of our troops and the indigenous peoples in the
middle-east/Afghanistan and other outposts.

the broad humanhood ammendment is itself a Satanic strategy, a wolf in sheeps clothing

Congratulations, ‘Rev’. You’re succeeding wildly in making those with beliefs similar to what you’re purveying look like total and complete
buffoons without a shred of education or intelligence. But then, that’s your purpose isn’t it?

Originally posted by Reverend SamuelTophatJack
Molech is represwented by an owl yes but he is afire God. A fallen angel to be percise and he eats babies.

Oh, man is that good. A spiritual being who eats babies!

And then you go and honor said being by capitalizing the word god in reference to it.
So obvious, so easy.

This is an important measure however, not just for the very young, or even unborn but for all of those that the government would seek to subject to
their power by proclaiming them non persons.

Oh I'm not joking. I am DEADLY SERIOUS. If what you say of this "warehouse" is true YOU, as the possessor of this information, have a DUTY to
both prove it and stop it. That's no joke. If it's true and you know it and you do nothing to prove or destroy it then you are just as guilty as
the people you accuse.

You may be an agent of the illuminati you sound like one.

Now THAT's a Joke. If I was Illuminati, and half of what you say is true and I had a hand in it, your bones would be somewhere in the sands of the
West or the bottom of the ocean, and that's a fact. Assuming the Illuminati are real I would guess they don't screw around, especially with
subjects like this.

Oh we are engaging the forces of darkness.

Ah yes, the ubiquitous "Forces of Darkness". Watch who you engage and how. There are those of us who fight for what's Good using Darkness as a
cloak; Darkness itself is a neutral force that can be bent to the will of the individual, just as there are those who use Light to blind others to
their own Evil. Life isn't always Black and White, Light and Dark.

Very very rarely do anti-abortion siding Christians take this following point into account in their argument. Which is the only reason I'm going to
mention it, since this whole issue is nothing but dead horse beating...

What happened before abortion? I hardly think Christians and others can honestly just deny to themselves what the alternatives entailed. The
twisted joke about the coat hanger isn't a figment of anyone's imagination, nor is purposely inflicting bodily harm like taking a fall down cement
stairs or a few slugs to the gut, ingesting substances that are known to poison the fetus or cause a miscarriage. Another thing with these barbaric
methods too, is they don't usually work until the fetus has grown into something sizable enough to damage (can't poke out an embryo).

Disturbing? Yes. Disgusting? Yes. Brutally honest? Of course!

If a woman thinks she has a real good reason to not have that child, she'll find a way. How can anyone imagine that if abortion was suddenly
banned that "home abortion" wouldn't again take over? Remember how much more often you'd hear about newborns with their umbilical still attached,
being found in dumpsters, back alleys and washing up under bridges?

This is all of course on top of all the other mountains of evidence, but as I started by saying, this has all been done to death. I wanted to make
that point though as it's usually glossed over.

One of the mose important rules i follow in life is "do unto others as you
would have them do unto you" . I think if more people were like this, the
world would be a much better place.

We were all embryos. Arent we all so happy we werent aborted and
we made it out to experience life.
If you can be thankful your embryo wasnt aborted, how could
you agree its ok to do it to another.
Arent we all just grown embryos?

Originally posted by josephine
One of the mose important rules i follow in life is "do unto others as you
would have them do unto you" . I think if more people were like this, the
world would be a much better place.

We were all embryos. Arent we all so happy we werent aborted and
we made it out to experience life.
If you can be thankful your embryo wasnt aborted, how could
you agree its ok to do it to another.
Arent we all just grown embryos?

Good advice.

I am happy I was not aborted.

I find it selfish, compare it to someone having to pay for his old fathers home, but can't afford it, so he kills him.

You stupid ignorant religious people. Scientists are much much smarter than you. Babies are the same as a turtle! Darwin taught us this a long long
time ago please get it in your cromagnon foreheads you backward hicks.

It is 100% safe and effective to kill defective children even after birth. Science knows this. Man is just an animal - he has no absolute rights-
rights are relative just like it was already said so eloquently by Mr. Rilence. Human right are a lie. Listen to science.

You have no right to life - get over it.

And Listen to Dr Singer he is much much smarter than you are too.

Singer advocates the killing of certain newborn infants at the discretion of their parents. The criteria he proposes for deciding which infants may be
killed center on a wide range of hereditary physical conditions which Singer considers "disabilities". He has been forthright and consistent in his
advocacy of this position for many years.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.