Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is looking for sympathy, support and political cover as her rivals show the temerity to run aggressively against the Democratic presidential front-runner. But don't feel sorry for her  Clinton is no stranger to "piling on."

In fact, she's an expert at it.

Ask anybody who stood on the marble floor of the state Capitol rotunda in 1990 and heard the click, clack, click of her low-heeled shoes approach the news conference of Tom McRae, a mild-mannered public servant who had the nerve to challenge then-Gov. Bill Clinton of Arkansas for re-election.

"Tom!" the state's first lady shouted. "I think we oughta get the record straight!"

McRae, a former Clinton appointee, stood a good chance of defeating the incumbent until Hillary Rodham Clinton sandbagged him. Holding a sheaf of papers, she crashed the news conference to undermine McRae's measured criticism of her husband's record.

"Many of the reports you issued not only praise the governor on his environmental record," she said, "but his education and his economic record!"

McRae didn't know how to respond without looking like a sexist bully. His candidacy was over. The Clintons' dreams for re-election and the White House lived on.

The McRae massacre came to mind this week after the Democratic presidential debate, when Clinton essentially hid behind her pantsuit in response to a public shellacking like the one she gave McRae.

Clinton's rivals for the Democratic nomination seized on her refusal to give straight answers about Social Security, immigration, her White House-era documents and other important issues. They hope to further the perception that she is slippery and overly political.

Rather than rebut her rivals' charges or confront the issues with facts and details, Clinton accused her rivals of ganging up on her.

She released a cleverly edited video showing rivals John Edwards, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Chris Dodd uttering her name in rapid-fire succession to the strains of Mozart's The Marriage of Figaro.

The video then cuts to the words, "The Politics of Pile On."

Her top strategist, Mark Penn, told supporters on a conference call that Clinton needed their help to survive "this six-on-one to try to bring her down."

In the call, first reported by The Hill newspaper, pollster Penn said he had already detected backlash from female voters.

On Thursday, the senator returned to her all-female alma mater, Wellesley College, and called it a place that taught her to compete "in the all-boys club of presidential politics."

Clinton's advisers, speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss internal matters, said there is a clear and long-planned strategy to fend off attacks by accusing her male rivals of gathering against her.

The idea is to change the subject while making Clinton a sympathetic figure, especially among female voters who often feel outnumbered and bullied on the job.

As one adviser put it, Clinton is not the first presidential candidate to play the "woe-is-me card" but she's the first major female presidential candidate to do it.

The victim is a familiar role for Clinton.

In her first run for the Senate, Republican rival Rep. Rick Lazio alienated many women voters when he strode across the stage in their first debate and demanded Clinton sign a pledge banning unregulated contributions known as "soft money" from her campaign.

Analysts considered the confrontation a turning point in the race, generating sympathy for Clinton while making Lazio look like a menacing bully.

Still, her advisers privately concede there is a potential down side to the 2008 woe-is-me strategy: Male and female voters alike want their presidents to be strong  not weak and whining, which is the perception Clinton must be careful to avoid.

The good news for Clinton is that she, unlike many women, has the upper hand.

High name recognition, lots of campaign cash, her husband's political legacy and her own three decades in public life more than level the playing field  as illustrated by Clinton's wide lead in national polls.

And this isn't her first rodeo. Remember, it was Clinton who defined and defied the "vast right-wing conspiracy," and who lashed out  or piled on  critics of her health care reform efforts in the early 1990s.

She has an alternative to the risky piling-on defense. Clinton could undercut her rivals' criticism by simply coming clean on more issues.

Just what is her stance on drivers' licenses for immigrants? How would she preserve Social Security? Why would her public views differ from what she says in private?

Why doesn't she demand that her husband release records from the White House, and donors to his library?

When would she withdraw troops from Iraq? What would cause her to wage war against Iran?

As she told McRae nearly 20 years ago, we oughta get the record straight.

So let’s see, this great feminist icon in addition to being a doormat to her cheating husband now also uses her gender to shield her from accountability and having to answer her critics. How can someone present herself as ready to take on the rigors of the presidency, a job held by men for over 200 years, when she wants to put out the message that she’s too effeminately dainty to take the heat of a political campaign?

The McRae massacre came to mind this week after the Democratic presidential debate, when Clinton essentially hid behind her pantsuit in response to a public shellacking like the one she gave McRae.

When the leftist media gets an excuse to attack women they just can't resist. I happen to loathe HRC, but it's highly amusing to watch the MSM turn into hyenas when they've found an excuse to attack a woman.

16
posted on 11/04/2007 10:35:19 PM PST
by Darkwolf377
(Pro-Life atheist Bostonian no longer sure about this party, positive about the dummies.)

LOL your graphics. Thoughts: She whines about being ganged up on by six metrosexual males, boo hoo, and the media and her minions enable her to go po po pitiful me picked on victimhood. I got six for you; the leaders of China, Russia, Iran, Syria, North Korea, and Venezuela; the question is begged,if your fellow metrosexual citizens overwhelm you, how the hell are you going to handle those that actively wish and pursue harm upon this nation? Can we expect press releases as our foreign policy condemning Putin, Assad, Kim, et al cause they picked on po po pitiful Hillary as they shove a nuke up our ass? I can’t understand why no candidate(Dem or Rep) hasn’t made this obvious point...well obvious to all. Can't have it both ways. Damn she pisses me off. I'll have to listen to "In The Still Of The Night" to calm down. G'night chere.

I love seeing these articles. The more journalists write about Hillary hiding behind her gender the less she will be able to get away with it. This is effectively taking that weapon away from her, setting up a perfect “There you go again, Hillary” moment for the Republican nominee in a debate.

There’s a large number of people here on FR who think half of the Republican candidates are just as bad as Hillary and say they will not vote if their Republican candidate is not running aginst her in the fall.

Ellen Ratner & Georgette Mosbacher were on Fox with the Friends this morning discussing Mrs. Clinton & the victim card...Ellen said that of course Hillary is being beaten up by the boys because she’s winning and kept insisting that she gave straight answers in the debates. Georgette & Gretchen weren’t buying it but Ellen kept sputtering and was all over the place trying to defend her pal, Hill.

28
posted on 11/05/2007 5:03:16 AM PST
by Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)

....if she actually becomes Pres. I might quit my job and take up fishing in Antartica.

Well, if you do, make sure you do it before calendar year 2009 begins, and make sure you apply to the penguins for Antarctic citizenship.

Otherwise you'll be getting visits and letters from the IRS demanding you pay your punitive, retroactive Hillary taxes on penises, cars, anybody with money or gold, and anyone who ever tuned in to Rush Limbaugh.

So lets see, this great feminist icon in addition to being a doormat to her cheating husband now also uses her gender to shield her from accountability and having to answer her critics. How can someone present herself as ready to take on the rigors of the presidency, a job held by men for over 200 years, when she wants to put out the message that shes too effeminately dainty to take the heat of a political campaign?

You nailed it.

How our enemies and adversaries must be laughing right now. (And how our allies are groaning.)

I got six for you; the leaders of China, Russia, Iran, Syria, North Korea, and Venezuela; the question is begged,if your fellow metrosexual citizens overwhelm you, how the hell are you going to handle those that actively wish and pursue harm upon this nation?

Did you notice that Bill Clinton came to her rescue immediately?

I believe this was part of the strategy all along.

It's the old "two for one" presidents that is supposed to appeal to women voters. You get the first female president, you get Mr. hot-pants back in the White house, and you have a experienced president as a back up if Hillary hits any rough spots.

Well, some of our allies. I’m sure others, mainly the Euroweenies, are loving it (Sarkozy being the exception.) “Finally! A US president as feminized, feckless and faltering as we are!” the Euros will probably say.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.