At 13:29 28/02/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:
[...]
>2. The informal example in section 4.1 can be read as suggesting RDF
>defined means to express propositional attitudes. We should be clear that
>propositional attitudes are not supported.
Recorded as
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-02
Thanks again Bob, the WG will consider this and respond in due course.
Brian