Constitution amendment: Failed bills may still be revisited, says Ekweremadu

Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu is optimistic that the amendments to the 1999 Constitution rejected by the DNational Assembly could still meet the constitutional threshold to become part of the constitution when revisited.

Senate President Bukola Saraki last week expressed the same sentiment when he declared that the killed proposal for devolution of power to state could still be revisited.

The National Assembly last week failed to pass some core issues, including removal of the Land Use Act from the constitution, devolution of more power to states, creation of states, boundary adjustment and institutionalisation of 35 per cent affirmative action for women.

A statement by the Special Adviser (Media) to Ekweremadu, Uche Anichukwu, said yesterday that Ekweremadu hailed his colleagues for approving about 95 per cent of the recommendations presented by his committee.

He assured Nigerians that it was not the end of the road for the failed alteration bills since constitution amendment is a continuum.

The statement quoted Ekweremadu as saying that further consultations as well as understanding of the issues at stake were needed.

Ekweremadu, who also chairs the Senate Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution, spoke during a consultative meeting on Southeast infrastructural development with a delegation of the Partnership to Engage, Reform and Learn (PERL) and the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) led by PERL’s Team Leader, Dr. Adiya Ode, in Abuja.

He said: “We commend our colleagues for their understanding and ensuring that about 95 per cent of the amendments we proposed to them scaled through.

“We are also conscious of the fact that Nigerians are worried about some of the recommendations that did not pass. Let me use this opportunity to further appreciate and reassure Nigerians that we are sensitive to their feelings and that we are likely going to revisit some of the issues they are concerned about when we return from our vacation.

“Some of the issues did not scale through because there is need for fuller understanding as well as more consultations and consensus-building on them and their implications for our people.”

Ekweremadu reiterated that devolution of more power to the federating units would quicken infrastructural development in the country.

He added: “No doubt, your studies on Southeast were right because the region is indeed highly challenged, especially in the areas of transport infrastructure such as roads, railway and seaport. We are also challenged in the areas of power.

“That is why we in the Committee on Constitution Review believe we mean well when we talk about things like devolution of power. Our view is that some of these things should be moved from the Exclusive List to the Concurrent List so that while the Federal Government is making efforts, the states too will be making efforts either individually or in clusters or partnership with one another.

“That was why we took things like power to the Concurrent List so that States can generate power, transmit, and distribute power. The same goes for railway, which is still the exclusive preserve of the Federal Government. That way, Nigeria can effectively speed up socio-economic development in all parts of the country.

“Unfortunately, some of these issues were misunderstood. But it is not the end of the road. We believe that with more engagements, the issues will be better appreciated and we are positive about more favourable dispositions when we revisit them. As leaders we all have our eyes on the future and are committed to building a better Nigeria for posterity”.