I've read Mein Kampf in parts so far. Enough to at least give me a sense of what National Socialism means. It means that the state isn't an end in itself, but only a means to an end. That end being the preservation and progress of the race. In order to achieve this end it takes having a fraternally unified people all working together for the common welfare. That's what the "Socialism" in National Socialism is all about.

Hm. Is there anything more that can be said about National Socialism itself?

What is there left to say about it?

National Socialism is now a pan-Aryan ideal where it was once only a pan-German ideal, but its basic thrust remains the same. The unity, preservation, and resumed progress of the White race. The resumed and eternal focus on all that which betters us, both as a race and as individual members of that race. The remembrance of our shared White culture and its eternal exaltation - as well as the creation of new cultural contributions to add unto our already vast inheritance. The renewed march of scientific progress and discovery that our people are world renowned for ever since the dawn of time - the march that may well lead us to the stars one day.

All that which was imperfectly understood in the early 20th century is now fully realized, and the pearls of wisdom from then are gathered together with the newly-discovered gems of today.

National Socialism is about us - our people's unity, our people's preservation, our people's progress, both as a race and as individuals. The aesthetics of old, ever powerful and timelessly inspiring, meet the honed and updated philosophy of today, which owes itself to the thought of yesteryear but it not trapped within it.

I know you've heard all this before, some of it from me, but it's something that bears repeating, even to the dedicated. National Socialism is both simple and, taken to its logical ends, endlessly complex and endlessly relevant.

Hitler fully admits to ethnically Cleansing the jews in his own words.
The fact of some jew purification isn't in question, only the extent to
which it took place. The number of 6 Million purged is a zionist fantasy!

"It was one of the achievements of National Socialism that it was the first to face the Jewish problem in a realistic manner. The Jews themselves have always aroused anti-semitism. Throughout the centuries, all the peoples of the world, from the ancient Egyptians to ourselves, have reacted in exactly the same way. The time comes when they become tired of being exploited by the disgusting Jew. They give a heave and shake themselves, like an animal trying to rid itself of its vermin. They react brutally and finally they revolt. It is an instinctive reaction, a reaction of repugnance against a stranger who refuses to adapt himself and become part of the whole, a parasite which clings to the host, imposes on it and exploits it to the utmost. By nature, the Jew is a parasite which cannot and will not be assimilated. A distinguishing feature of the Jew is that, unlike other foreigners, he everywhere claims all the rights of citizenship in the community that shelters him - and at the same time remains always a Jew. He regards it as his right to be allowed to run with the hare and hunt with the hounds; and he is the only man in the whole world to claim such an
extravagant privilege."I have always been absolutely fair in my dealings with the Jews. On the eve of war, I gave them onefinal warning. I told them that, if they precipitated another war, they would not be spared and that I would exterminate the vermin throughout Europe, and this time once and for all. To this warning they retorted with a declaration of war and affirmed that wherever in the world there was a Jew, there, too, was an implacable enemy of National Socialist Germany." -Adolf Hitler
from: The last Testament of Adolf Hitler
A.K.A. The Hitler Bormann Documents

So very true; we must never forget that the Nazis understood and defined "socialism" differently than the world has defined it following the second world war. Let me regurgitate a quote from my first post on this thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfheart

On another note, there is no difference between "Nazi" and "National Socialist". The former is an abbreviation for the latter, and though it did have a somewhat derogatory nature back in the early 20th century, it's a reclaimed word that, for us, has a positive meaning. But in regards to real socialism, according to Dr. Joseph Goebbels:

"Yes, we call ourselves Socialist. That's the second step. The second step away from the middle-class State. We call ourselves Socialist in protest against the lie of social middle-class pity. We don't want pity, and we don't want social-mindedness. We don't care a hoot for that which you call 'social welfare legislation.' That's barely enough to keep body and soul together.

"We want the rights to which nature and the law entitle us.

"We want our full share of what Heaven gave us, and of the returns from our physical and mental labors.

Again, we see that "socialism" here meant laying claim to all the Nazis felt their people deserved as a White society. "Socialism" to them meant realizing their people's worth, realizing their people's rightful place, and rejecting the self-pity (and subsequent wage-slave drone mentality) that Communist ideology meant to foster upon the working class.

In short, the classical Nazi definition of "Socialism" had nothing to do with what Socialism truly is, or at least has come to be.

Now, while I am at a loss for handy Mein Kampf quotations (I shall try to remedy this in the future), I can vouch, based on my previous study of this book, that the Nazis also did not believe the government should not try to have any hand in helping the people it governed. On the contrary, the National Socialists believed the government's purpose was to protect and serve the people. Not to master them like a collective of autocrats, not to ignore them and their troubles (as troubles will always come), but to do its best to do what's best for the people.

The National Socialists realized that governments should have a responsibility to their constituents. The people have their own lives and therefore cannot invest time and resources into running a country as well as running their families or their businesses or what have you. Therefore, the government has to man up and serve the people it claims to represent. Hitler, for one, stressed this throughout Mein Kampf repeatedly. One such example is the Reichsarbeitdienst (or RAD - Reich Labour Service), which was formed to combat unemployment and provide meaningful jobs (instead of handouts) to unemployed Germans; one of its construction projects was the Autobahn, the world's first freeway system.

So, yes, the Nazis were "Socialists" in the sense that they believed that the government should serve the people (and not exploit them for their own gain), as well as, according to Dr. Goebbels, that the German people had a rightful place in the world and had a duty to claim it. Today, we neo-Nazis believe similarly; the government of any White nation should still serve and protect its people and not master or exploit them, and that the entire White race has a rightful place in the world to claim.

National Socialism like all expansive governments requires a benevolent leader who really care about his people. The problem is that the Jew will infiltrate this governemnt and exploit ti for his own gain. Look at what happened here in America, this erstwhile great country once free. I agree that race is a much better motivater for national unity but ultimatly individual freedoms will insure that those united people stay focused. A government should be small and attempt to treat all people the same, of course if all the people in a country are of the same race this is simplified. If the people rule themselves, then all is well, but when the Jew is in control of the governing body, they will revolt.
Socialisim was invented by Jews because it is the easiest way for them to control the masses. Those in power are easy to twist because of the reason they are in that position, they love power. Offer them more power and they will jump at the chance. A socialist government offers the leader the most power, even National Socialism can easily be perverted. I am sure most of you would agree that the ultimate effect of Hitlers treatment of the Jews afforded them more power than ever. Hitler, the poster boy for National Socialism was himself used for the Zionists goals, perhaps more than any other leader.
Sorry this is so long, i just wanted to add my .02$