And more empty groups

Crit 1's... the only one with any useful content at all is Broken syringe, and even then it's not enough to warrant a page, given that it's not even created by the group themselves -- boxytalk • i 13:14 29 March 2008 (BST)

A keep for 'The Saints' - "I'm a member of The Saints, we'll edit the page once we've got more details sorted out" was written on its talk page less than a fortnight ago. --Toejam 17:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

All Done but The Saints, it's under construction.--Karekmaps?! 17:36, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Empty group pages

Crit 1 - they may be on the stats page, but none of them have any content whatsoever, and none of them have been edited by any member of the respective groups -- boxytalk • i 12:01 29 March 2008 (BST)

Created from drama to stop drama they are now gone. Until they start doing things that result in a large number of inquiries about them they aren't notable or in need of a source of basic information that the dispute that resulted in their creation meant. We don't need a page for every group that makes the stats page.--Karekmaps?! 12:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1

Mostly old, abandoned, short group pages. The last one also qualifies for crit 2. --ZsL 14:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

A few have a page or two linking to them and one had an image.-- AHLGTG 21:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1

The last charge - I really don't see how this can be expanded further...it's basically a user's own opinion of the Meatshield tactic. Sort of thing that belongs on a talk page to be honest. -- Cheese 12:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

It says "underconstruction don't delete" and it was created only a day ago. Move to a user sub page? -- AHLGTG 17:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not comfortable deleting it either, since it is only two days old. You can put a request on A/MR or A/D, whatever you think is better. --ZsL 15:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, yeah I know why, that was the old portal link and someone foolishly used it as the link in the map instead of using the location, that map on my page was copy-pasted from the Tollyton page.--Karekmaps?! 02:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

i would have done it myself, i didnt feel comfortable editing Kareks ProjDev page --Scotw 08:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

They seem to serve different purposes. Any more specific reason then that they both only have that one character's info?--Karekmaps?! 21:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Well the one I put up for deletion was his first contribution to the wiki. Presumably he followed the link from either the welcomenewbie template, or perhaps the welcome message everyone gets on sign up. Many people just edit that page without changing "Character Name" to their characters actual name (Taraken in this case). Later, he started creating pages for all his alts, Taraken among them. They are both character pages for the same alt... he only needs one, and the one with the correct name on it, created later, should be kept -- boxytalk • i 09:31 12 March 2008 (BST)

All relevant info has been moved to that other sub page, there isn't any reason to keep it. Delete, no? -- AHLGTG 01:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

If he's been making other character pages for more than just the one alt then I can't see any reason why not. I've yet to check his contribs, feel free to do it if you wish.--Karekmaps?! 02:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Checked his contribs, that was indeed the case, the page has been smote.--Karekmaps?! 03:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I've left the ATO medals and the CCrecruitment templates undeleted. The ATO medals are being used(there are two more) it's just something that looks to be done in escalating levels. and the CCrecruitment isn't used because their Category:Recruitment add seems to have been removed, I assume because of a lack of updating the timestamps, odds are it will be put to use when they notice.--Karekmaps?! 03:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)