In the World of the High Tech Redneck, the Graybeard is the old guy who earned his gray by making all the mistakes, and tries to keep the young 'uns from repeating them. Silicon Graybeard is my term for an old hardware engineer; a circuit designer. The focus of this blog is on doing things, from radio to home machine shops and making all kinds of things, along with comments from a retired radio engineer running from tech or science news to economics; from firearms to the world at large.

Friday, January 8, 2016

The Gutsiest Product of CES 2016

There's a lot of fun stuff going on CES; things like rollable LED TV screens, automatic bartenders, 3D candy printers, and a mood dress, but when it comes to gutsy innovation, I think the award has to go the Ehang 184 drone. See, this isn't your average golden-age-of-narcissism-type drone that follows you and documents how awesome you are, this drone carries you and delivers your actual awesomeness somewhere else. Specifically, somewhere else fairly close; it's rated to carry a person up to 264 pounds for up to 23 minutes.

Ehang says its 142-horsepower electric motor is good for an average cruising speed of
62 mph. The Ehang 184 has a span of 18 feet when fully unfolded, weighs
440 lbs, and can carry a passenger weighing up to 264 pounds. Its
maximum flying altitude is 11,480 feet, and the AAV can fly for as long
as 23 minutes at sea level.

And—get this—the Ehang 184 can be controlled entirely
through a mobile app. In fact, Ehang says passengers only have to
execute two commands: “take off” and “land.” Once you’ve set your
course, the Ehang 184 will take off vertically, and use real-time sensor
data (and presumably GPS) to keep you on course.

Based on those numbers quoted in the first paragraph, I'd say its
practical range would be on the order of 15 miles. While it's tempting to say 23 miles is over a third of an hour, and with a speed of 62 mph, a third of an hour at 62 is over 20 miles each way, that leaves no contingency for needing extra power for anything, like accelerating to 62 for example. Perhaps a lighter person could stretch that out farther.

The company itself, Ehang, is based in Guangzhou, China, and they see it the way the original hype on the Segway came across; "it's going to change everything!" They envision it as changing commuting and transportation around the world. Well maybe, in dense cities where commutes may be under that 15 mile limit. It's not available yet, and this is where the troubles start. Its service altitude means it can fly in controlled air space, and you really don't want to spend a lot of time at its 11,480 foot ceiling if you don't have oxygen available. Legally, this puts it in danger of needing to be certified like any other small, privately owned aircraft. Aside from having four struts carrying props, making it look more like a toy drone, how is it different from a small helicopter? The FAA recognizes a class of experimental aircraft called ultralight, but the requirements say that the maximum empty weight has to be under 254 lbs; a far cry from that 440 lbs. cited above.

That makes it sound like any other private aircraft to me, and I don't know that it meets the other requirements for a helicopter. I see what looks to be a headlight, and the video at that PCWorld link seems to show the other required lights small aircraft are required to have. What about a radio for communicating with the ground or other aircraft? Aircraft that fly in controlled air space need to be equipped with a transponder, and other equipment. None of that gets mentioned. As with anything else in the extremely regulated world of aviation, the questions have little to do with the actual airframe and almost entirely come down to legal matters. The company issued a statement saying:

“Because the 184 AAV represents an
entirely new category of technology, there are regulations and agencies
that are still catching up. We are in uncharted waters, and are working
closely with government agencies across the planet to develop and
regulate the future of transportation.”

Price is estimated at around a quarter of a million dollars; 200 to $300,000, potentially available later in the year. I don't think I'll hold my breath on this one, but it's as close to the Jetsons' flying cars that I see out there.

8 comments:

Now THIS is the type of drone that could REALLY cause terminal damage to a passenger airplane when someone decides to operate it near an airport. And seriously injure or kill someone on the ground when the Bozo On Board goes stupid. NOT the things that our fine Betters are now regulating.

But surely you jest when you say this is "The Gutsiest Product of CES 2016". I'm reasonably confident this beats that hands down:http://preview.tinyurl.com/zd6opgvand will sell far better as well.}:-]

I think the horsepower rating must be a peak rating, not a steady state 142 HP.

Check out the illustration of the drone on this page. It says 14.4 kWH at the lower right, but 106 kW on the left. Since 14.4 kWH divided by 106 kW is 0.136 hour, and they're claiming 0.383 hour flight time at sea level, it must only hit that HP for a short time.

The specs don't quite seem to agree.

As for how much battery there is, could this be one of those instances where a higher voltage cell helps?

Followers

This Is A Test

Les Paul

People of the Gun

Gun Blog Black List

Stuff I've Been Reading

About Me

Retired radio engineer, follower of Christ, RF designer, mentor. Radio ham, home shop machinist, lapidary, silversmith, roadie cyclist, learning to be a rifleman, and home defender, - a guy with too many interests to keep track of.

Contact Me

Have something you'd like to talk about but don't want to use the comments? You can email me at:

SiGraybeard at gmail dot com.

Commercial links

On occasion, I link to books on Amazon.com or to other commercial sites. I do this as a way of illustrating what I'm referring to, not as revenue generation. I do not obtain any revenue or financial reward for this blog. I have not received samples of anything, nor gifts of any kind. My aim is to make the insights worth more than you pay for them.