** filling a gap is good, but changing a previous belief is usually better

+

** manifest problem (we have a problem to solve) versus critical problem (actually, we have a different problem) -> gives the impression that the writer is doing critical thinking (not only informing, but criticizing)

<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->

<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->

statis -> concession -> destabilizing condition (but) -> consequences: all this helps persuade the reader that we're going to address an important problem

filling a gap is good, but changing a previous belief is usually better

manifest problem (we have a problem to solve) versus critical problem (actually, we have a different problem) -> gives the impression that the writer is doing critical thinking (not only informing, but criticizing)