On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:15:11AM -0400, jamal wrote:
>
> The main reason i did the XFRM_SAP_* is to be able to cover a case where
> a message was relevant to one KM but not the other. That may not
> exist now (actually it does with policy expiration that pfkey cant
> handle - but thats easy to take care of).
> Hopefully XFRM_MSG_xxx is the superset and will be sufficient.
Since xfrm_user is meant to be the native interface, this should never
happen.
> Do you have anymore patches? If not i can give these a quick test;
> Masahide has a better test setup and if he has time he should as well.
That's it for now.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt