Friday, September 17, 2010

Bonus Post: Inevitable Comments on Qur'an Burnings

The Dakota Student, the UND student newspaper, asked me to write a guest column on the rise of anti-Islamic sentiment in the U.S. I felt uncomfortable about sticking my faculty nose in a student paper, but I agreed. (This month's WHY? monologue is about my trepidation.) And since it was for the student paper, I decided to, in the words of Malcolm X, "talk right down to earth, in a language that everybody here can easily understand." (To hear his voice, and an awesome 80's song that samples it, go here:) So, for those of you who are interested, here is the column:

On Burning Books and Terror Babies

Some people are just dicks. I recognize that as a philosophy professor, one might expect a more sophisticated response to the Reverend Terry Jones’s desire to burn Qur’ans, but there isn’t much more to say about him. He’s a charlatan – an attention-whore – and he’s using tragedy and politics to gain his fifteen minutes of fame. He’s not an agent of God. He is a purveyor of adolescent angst. Don’t give him any attention and he’ll go away.

The people who condemned the book burning – politicians ranging from Barack Obama to Sarah Palin – did so by citing the imminent danger to American service personnel. I certainly don’t disagree. But they neglect the greater danger to the Baptist church in Lawrence, Kansas; the Pentecostal community in Boston, Massachusetts; the Mormons in Lubbock Texas. The terrorists can’t tell the Christians apart – they can’t even tell Americans apart in general – and when they strike back, they’re not going to bomb Jones’s church, they’re going to bomb someone else’s. They might bomb a synagogue, or a Chuck E Cheese. They believe all Americans think the same way, have the same values, and share the same religious points of view. They’re bigots.

Of course, so is Jones, and so are many of us. Lots of Americans can’t tell Muslims apart. They think that the folks who bombed the World Trade Center share the same religion as those who want to build a cultural center a few blocks from ground zero, but those two groups have as little in common as White Pride skinheads do with Episcopalians. Yes, they share the same book. But so does the guy who shoots the abortion doctor and the priest who distributes clean needles to heroin addicts. If we shouldn’t paint all those people with the same brush, then why should we paint Muslims as such?

The worst offender, to my mind, is not the moronic Reverend Jones, but Texas Representative Louie Gohmert who claims that there are “terror babies” in our midst. Muslims, he claims, are having children in the U.S. just so they can gain citizenship and train them to blow us all up. He is not a dick. He is much worse, although my professional judgment prevents me from using the appropriate words to describe him accurately. His message can be boiled down a familiar racist accusation, “they don’t love their children the way we love ours,” and its logical extension, “they are not human.”

For Gohmert, Muslims are lesser creatures who willingly procreate to develop an army. They suckle their babies smiling, not with love, but with the vision of their child’s body parts spraying across the landscape taking as many people with them as they can. He thinks they are monsters, that they must be stopped.

In the nineteenth century there was a debate as to whether “negroes” were able to love. Black people were not regarded as fully human, and scholars wondered if they were capable of this most human emotion. This debate ought to make us all nauseous, but it is a short walk from it to Gohmert’s position, one enabled by Jones’s and by all those who can’t tell Muslims apart anymore than the fanatics of Al Qaeda can distinguish individual Americans, Americans, by the way, who themselves may be Muslim and wholly loyal to our democracy.

Terry Jones is a dick and the response to him is simple. Everyone should just walk up to him and say “stop being a dick.” But Gohmert and the rest are anti-American bigots and the response to them must be to tirelessly point out their ignorance. This requires learning more about the world and the people who inhabit it. It means accepting, once and for all, that Islam is not a four-letter word, and that assuming it is makes all of us bigots too. So stop it.

1 comment:

Your comments made in 2010 are as pertinent today, as the were then, and perhaps quite a bit more. With the fairly recent rise of ISIS we are experiencing renewed fear and prejudice against our Muslim citizens, and our Billionaire candidate has called for a complete ban on all Muslims, including efforts to take out their families as part of the drive for national security.

It's understandable that we may experience angst before boarding a plane with Arabic people on the flight manifest, but it's not, and should not be, acceptable to demonize an entire religion in the name of fighting for our American "values." Patriotism often demands that we accept the least popular propaganda about other religious and ethnic groups we love to hate, and thus dispel hatred that is often funneled through stereotypical mythologies about people we don't understand. And that of course, requires that we quit stereotyping every member of any other group in that negative and narrow light. unfortunately, the main problem has successfully been created by the Bastards in ISIS when they succeeded in making terrorism into a war about religions, and not about extreme thugs who seek only to destroy all in their path. These are people who want nothing more than to bring about global panic and fear. We all share in creating a part of this apocalyptic scenario, because as part of our social and genetic history we often fear those who are different from ourselves, or those whose ideologies differ from our own.

Sadly, in 2016 your comments are just as relevant today as they were in 2010!

Subscribe

Welcome to PQED

The is a blog written by Jack Russell Weinstein, the Director of the Institute for Philosophy in Public Life, the host of Why? Philosophical Discussions About Everyday Life, and a Professor of Philosophy at the University of North Dakota. It is dedicated to the exploration of philosophy. Everyone can join in regardless of their expertise or credentials. Be thoughtful and respectful, courageous and interesting, and post your comments to converse with the world. And please, enjoy yourself.

This blog is a project of IPPL. However, unless otherwise stated, these are Jack's opinions, ideas, and explorations, no one else's, including IPPL's, Why? Radio's, Prairie Public radio's, or The University of North Dakota's.)

Search PQED

Like us on Facebook:

Ask PQED a question; get an answer on the blog!

Silly or serious, send us a question and we'll make philosophy out of it. Click on the picture or write to ask@pqed.org

Call PQED (or Why ? Radio)

Donate to PQED, WHY? Radio, and The Institute for Philosophy in Public Life

PQED is the blog for WHY? Radio

Listen live or via podcast. Click on the image to visit whyradioshow.org

About

The Institute for Philosophy in Public Life is a non-profit organization funded by The University of North Dakota College of Arts & Sciences and Office of Research and Economic Development. To donate to IPPL, please write us at ippl@und.edu.

This site is maintained by Jack Russell Weinstein, Director of the Institute for Philosophy in Public Life. Please direct all queries to ippl@und.edu