Wine 1.0 Tasks

On Tuesday 30 May 2006 06:01, Dan Kegel wrote:
> If you look at http://bugs.winehq.org/ you'll see a link on the left hand
> side called "1.0 Tasks", which lists the 1.0 bugs being tracked in
> bugzilla. Here's the URL it links to
>http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_s>tatus=REOPENED&product=Wine&target_milestone=1.0.0
>> I suspect a few of these are stale, and a bunch others are missing,
> but I like the idea of using bugzilla to track our progress to 1.0.
>> What other bugs should be fixed before 1.0? Let's nominate
> a few bugs to add to the 1.0 task list, discuss them a bit, and see
> what Alexandre thinks.
>> For instance:
> I'd like one goal of 1.0 to be "make Windows developers take Wine
> seriously." To achieve that, I think 1.0 has to support at least some
> Microsoft development tools well, including their IDEs and debuggers. It's
> probably unreasonable to require 1.0 to support .NET, so maybe supporting
> the last pre-.NET versions of Visual C++ (6.2?) and Visual Basic (6.0?)
> would be a good goal. And I don't think it's that unreasonable anymore;
> Wine is pretty close to being able to do that. What do y'all think?
> - Dan
I approve
(Note the #3902 should be renamed as 'DIB Engine rewrite', and i don't think
is mandatory for 1.0)
But i think we must fix users most hated bugs as:
- dsound deadlocks/craps
- openGL problems (multi contexts, fb/visual configs)
- lotus problems
Note: it will be interesting to add user votes to wine-bugs (ala kde) to
better see user needs.
Regards,
Raphael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20060530/d2ee29d7/attachment.pgp