Risks of VBAC & Uterine Rupture

At one time, a Cesarean delivery ended any chance of future vaginal deliveries for a mother-to-be. But thanks to advances in surgical procedures, a vaginal birth after C-section (VBAC) is feasible in many cases. Statistics show that around 75 percent of women who try VBAC have a successful delivery with no complications.

However, VBAC isn’t right for every woman, as risks to both mother and child, while minimal, are still present. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommend that a VBAC only take place in a hospital where obstetricians have access to anesthesia and are able to perform an emergency C-section, if necessary.

Though risks of complications are low, approximately 0.8% of women attempting VBAC may suffer a ruptured uterus – a potentially fatal complication for both baby and mother. Sadly, some of these babies will die or experience severe brain damage in the process. For this reason, a vaginal birth after Cesarean has been the topic of heated debate within the medical community, as questions have been raised over the safety and risk factors for uterine scar rupture and fetal neurological impairment.

Liability for VBAC complications

If VBAC is chosen as the preferred mode of delivery, the woman’s OBGYN team must be fully prepared to respond to a uterine rupture or symptoms of fetal distress. If they fail in this critical responsibility, they may be held liable for any injury or death they cause.

While advocating for the rights of birth injury malpractice victims throughout the United States over the past four decades, the law firm of Eisbrouch Marsh has cultivated a deep understanding of the standards of care that apply to VBAC cases. Our team of birth injury lawyers are aided by in-house medical experts when researching the circumstances of any potential claim, and are committed to securing justice for both mother and child.

Using our extensive legal and health care expertise, we provide clients with the type of representation they are counting on to obtain maximum compensation and hold negligent parties accountable for their actions.

VBAC and uterine scar rupture

The primary concern with VBAC is that in some rare cases, the previous uterine scar can rip apart during labor, ultimately resulting in injury or death to the fetus. Research shows that the risk of uterine scar rupture increases to about 1 percent in women who are administered Pitocin during labor, assuming the woman has a single low transverse Cesarean scar.

The risk for uterine rupture increases among women who have low vertical scars (1-3%) and is even greater with high vertical scars. When uterine rupture does occur, 80 to 90 percent of women can have an emergency C-section and deliver an unharmed baby, but up to 20 percent of cases end in fetal injury or death. A Cesarean delivery carries its own latent risks (including hemorrhaging, blood clots and anesthesia mistakes), but these may be deemed more predictable, unlike those associated with sudden uterine rupture.

Early warnings of uterine rupture

Uterine scar rupture during a VBAC can occur without any warning, and may be more likely in some women depending on the placement and length of their original C-section scar.

Possible signs of uterine scar rupture during labor include:

Diminished intensity of contractions

Vaginal bleeding

Signs of fetal distress such as heart rate changes

Localized pain near the uterine scar

Benefits and risks of vaginal birth after C-section

Women and their health care providers may consider VBAC over a repeat C-section for many reasons, including:

Shorter recovery time

Less pain after delivery

Fewer risks of complications

Less impact on future pregnancies (avoiding another uterine scar)

A lower risk of infection

More active participation in the birth

Women who suffer health conditions that might affect a natural delivery or those who experienced uterine rupture during a prior pregnancy are not good candidates for VBAC. This method is also not indicated for women who’ve had a vertical C-section incision — the type of scar that is most likely to rupture during labor.

Regular fetal monitoring and the availability of an emergency C-section by health care professionals are paramount to avoid serious complications during VBAC.

VBAC complications include:

Uterine infection – If a woman is forced to undergo a repeat C-section after vaginal labor has begun, she has a slightly higher risk of complications like uterine infection.

Speak to a birth injury attorney today

The consensus among most medical professionals is that VBACs pose greater risks when compared to routine vaginal deliveries. In some cases, those fetal and maternal risks were not properly assessed or managed during the time of labor.

If you have suffered injuries related to uterine scar rupture, or your child sustained brain damage following a vaginal birth after C-section, your delivery room team may be held liable in a court of law.

Eisbrouch Marsh has a long track record of winning cases and negotiating multi-million dollar settlements, helping victims recover the compensation to which they are entitled. To learn more about your options for pursuing a medical malpractice lawsuit, please call our offices for a free case evaluation. We work on a contingency basis, meaning there are no upfront costs unless you win your case.

Medstak provides accurate, up to date information about medical malpractice and birth injuries. This site is sponsored by Eisbrouch Marsh, LLC, with principal offices located at 50 Main Street, Hackensack NJ 07601. Our aim is to educate and empower readers with tools to protect their legal rights after being harmed by medical negligence.

The content of this website has been prepared by Medstak on behalf of Eisbrouch Marsh, for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. The content posted on this website is not intended to create a lawyer-client relationship, and readers should not act upon information received on this site without seeking independent legal counsel. This website contains attorney advertising. Reported outcomes are not indicative of future results.