It is openly critical of groups, including FOE and RAN, for making, 'exaggerated claims in their campaigns...misleading and unverified accusations of avoidable environmental degradation by corporations.'

It says there are 50,000 orangutans in 54 wild populations scattered across Sumatra and Borneo. And that at least 38 of those populations exceed 250 individuals, the level needed to maintain a viable breeding population.

No extinctionin 2011

Other organisations like the Sumatran Orangutan Society refuse to use extinction dates because of their unreliability. ‘We prefer to say that they are likely to be the first great ape species to become extinct unless we stop deforestation,’ says spokesperson Helen Buckland.

Report co-author Rhett Butler explains further: 'We aren't saying the deforestation isn't occuring (it certainly is) but that NGOs need to be careful about getting the facts right. For example, claiming that orang-utans are going to be extinct by 2011 is not accurate.'

RAN admitted that its figure was inaccurate. Spokesperson Margaret Swink said it had been taken from a Guardian news report that in turn got it from a British orangutan association.

'Everyone wants to take the fact that is the most convincing or grabs people's attention the quickest. We try and be as accurate as possible but we don't always succeed.

'We are a campaigning organisation so research is not our main thrust,' she says.Unfair comparison

Swink says she hopes people realise that the action they and other NGOs take are designed to force corporations to be more responsible and acknowledge the impact their decisions have on wild orangutan populations.

'This is the critical point rather than the exact extinct date of 2011, 2015 or 2020,' she says.

A point reiterated by Friends of the Earth (FOE), who said it was 'completely unfair' to compare the tactics of corporations and NGOs.

'On the one hand FOE is concerned about human rights and environmental protection. On the other hand, you have PR projects funded by industries that destroy the environment and commit human rights abuses,' says head of economics Ed Matthews.

Matthews said species like the orangutan were emblematic of the wider destruction of rainforest in Indonesia. 'To get corporations to act, to galvanise political parties, we have to focus on emblematic cases.

'But we would never have used the figures we used if we had not thought it was credible,’ he says.Short-term tactics

The report says such an approach could actually be 'counterproductive' to safeguarding against deforestation.

In the short term, says the report, blackwashing can 'make headlines, raise the profile of environmental debates and increase donations'. But in the longer term, blackwashing exposed for what it really is could, 'diminish the trust invested in environmental groups and more generally undermine public support for conservation.'

Co-author Rhett Butler says NGOs rushing to defend their use of facts are missing a more important point, namely the unprecedented power environmental groups have to change corporate behaviour, if they stick to accurate facts.

'Given current trends, it seems likely that in the future the bulk of environmental degradation (especially deforestation) will be driven by industrial enterprises rather than subsistence users. Thus since corporate entities are the actors, engagement is important.'NGO power

Butler points to the success of a recent Greenpeace campaign that pressurised the largest soy crushes in the Amazon to implement a moratorium on soy processing, pending the development of a tracking mechanism to ensure their crop was coming from environmentally-responsible producers.

He said while the rise of industrial-scale deforestation was ‘alarming’, it allowed NGOs to focus their attention on a ‘vastly smaller number of resource-exploiting corporations’.

‘We have to be realistic,’ says Buckland. ‘Oil plantations are not going to go away. Deforestation will continue, we cannot save every tree. But there are millions of acres of land available in Indonesia that is not of conservation value,’ she says.

Friends of the Earth said they also took a deliberate decision to harness corporate support for ethical palm oil rather than call for a boycott. Ed Matthews said while RSPO had not developed as they had hoped they had succeeded in getting all major UK supermarkets to join up.

While admitting RSPO on its own was never going to be enough, Buckland said activists calling for a ban on palm oil were getting their message across the loudest but ultimately confusing the public.

‘People might assume there will be an easy alternative to palm oil but that might be soya and then the problem is exported to the Amazon,’ she says.

How to collaborate with companies?

Buckland admits they have to continually assess their relationships with companies to make sure there is progress being made, ‘we do not want to let them use us as greenwash’.

But Butler and his co-authors say RSPO and the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) pointed the way forward for NGOs.

INVESTIGATIONHave greens got it wrong about tar sands?For environmentalists, tar sands are a 'climate crime'; for peak oil experts, they can never do the job of ordinary crude. But neither critique tells the full story: that exploiting tar sands may worsen both the climate crisis, and the energy crisis...

COMMENTWhere did all the green funding go?There's still money to be had for good environmental projects, but it's a fraction of what's being spent in other areas, says Harriet Williams

Help us keep The Ecologist working for the planet

The Ecologist website is a free service, published by The Resurgence Trust, a UK-based educational charity. We work hard - with a small budget and tiny editorial team - to bring you the wide-ranging, independent journalism we know you value and enjoy, but we need your help. Please make a donation to support The Ecologist platform. Thank you!

Share this article

About the author

Channel

Topic

Tags

Latest Edition

The latest edition of Resurgence & Ecologist is out now, and available to buy from the Resurgence Trust website.

ABOUT US

The Ecologist is the world’s leading environmental affairs platform.

Our aim is to educate and inform as many people as possible about the wonders of nature, the crisis we face and the best solutions and methods in managing that crisis. Find out about our mission, and our team, here. The website is owned and published by The Resurgence Trust, an educational charity. To receive the magazine, become a member now. The views expressed in the articles published on this site may not necessarily reflect those of the trust, its trustees or its staff.