It effected the whole western world! The United Kingdom and United States Military Forces were deployed almost instantly to Afghanistan to chase Osama Bin-faggot.

From the neutral point of view, I think the terrorists won this. They bomb some of the most important financial buildings in the western world, they cause our Populations to be shocked by terror demorilising the public. It lead to our young Men and Women being sent out to fight a nearly unwinnable war. ever weak we see another soldier being send home in a bodybag, the media globalises it, spreading more "terror" through-out the population.

The only way we can win this war is if one of our leaders has enough nads to press the BIG RED BUTTON! and turn there shithole caves to glass hallways!

i donbt see what this has to do with this war making spme people alot of money

*cough*
Firstly. Buildings 5 and 6 weren't towers.
Secondly. WTC 5&6 were critical victims of falling debris from WTC 1&2.
Thirdly. The terrorist attack was aimed for the WTC complex and not the buildings around it, AM I RITE?

*cough*
Firstly. Buildings 5 and 6 weren't towers.
Secondly. WTC 5&6 were critical victims of falling debris from WTC 1&2.
Thirdly. The terrorist attack was aimed for the WTC complex and not the buildings around it, AM I RITE?

No it turns people into Tyrants, The rich get richer and more brutal, the poor get poorer and weaker. Leading envitably to the collapse of social stability. Which is the aim of a terrorist!

Someday our friendly little gentleman/gentlewoman/gentlemaster will grow up to become a politician

So far you had one legimit post, imo.
This blunt texted, though the society wouldn't become more unstable if the richer got richer. As long as there are rich people they will hire(/enslave) cheap manpower, THUS is the aim of a real terrorist.
Real terrorists work without being noticed, there are many terrorist organizations in this world.
Some of them fight just to make terror (for religious reasons or not) there by skipping their rational thoughts.
More organizations just fight because they get paid.

However, this has nothing regarding the topic at all. So I will eagerly await my ban.

For those of you who still think WTC7 should have fallen sideways try this out.

Arrange dominoes in a grid like structure 15 high. Now take out some in the middle to represent fire damage. To keep you from saying "OH well there was no fire!" Only take out 2 or 3, as even a small fire would take out some. Now hit the corner with a pencil, just like a steel beam.

Did it tip over sideways? No, some fell slightly to the outside but for the most part they all fell on top of each other inward.

Of course the sides that weren't facing the twin towers look unscathed, but from that angle you can't see the sides that did face the towers.

For all you know they could have been torn to shit.

The Verizon Building is a 32-story Art Deco building in New York City, located in Lower Manhattan. It is named for Verizon Communications, for which it is the headquarters.[2] The building is located at 140 West Street, adjacent to the World Trade Center site and 7 World Trade Center, and is bounded by Barclay, Washington, and Vesey Streets. The building experienced major damage in the September 11, 2001 attacks. Its thick masonry exterior and use of masonry to protect steel columns and structural elements helped the building withstand the attacks. Restoration of the building after the attacks took three years, at a cost of $1.4 billion.

Obviously atleast the Verizon took damage :Phttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Building
According to wikipedia ^,^. But my experience tells me that wikipedia can be somwhat fact wrong :0
Can't be arsed to look up the verizon official building schemes again..

For those of you who still think WTC7 should have fallen sideways try this out.

Arrange dominoes in a grid like structure 15 high. Now take out some in the middle to represent fire damage. To keep you from saying "OH well there was no fire!" Only take out 2 or 3, as even a small fire would take out some. Now hit the corner with a pencil, just like a steel beam.

Did it tip over sideways? No, some fell slightly to the outside but for the most part they all fell on top of each other inward.

Apart from the whole "kidnapping" "Mr Boss has everything done for him" "he earns alot of cash by doing it" parts, it's a really logical theory. (and exclude the part of the Mafia boss, this has nothing to do with the Mafia)
Yet again, highly unlikely, but it is possible.

I think he gets aroused when people call him out on the irony of his name

I'll list them;

International TV networks - Broadcasting the NewsNewspaper Companys - Spreading the NewsContruction Company's - Hired by government to find weaknesses in BuildingAero-Scientists - Specialist's that can name there own price to be hire to investigate.The Politicians - Claiming Increased wages to cover "Stress"People Buying US Company Shares - Can make massive returns in the future.Pyrotecknic Specialists - Investigating alsoFilm Studios in Hollywood - They make millions exploiting the Story providing nothing to the victims.Rival Airlines to the planes that hit towers - Scared to fly with same airline, Demorilises customers.100s of TV programmes about 9/11 - making money from sponsors etc...

There are probably many more, but I can't think of atm, Probably cuz it's getting really late or "early"

I'll list them;
There are probably many more, but I can't think of atm, Probably cuz it's getting really late or "early"

There's an old saying: Don't believe everything you see.

There are alot of media-sources that come with false statements, no, even lies. Just to make things interesting.

If you read the papers and you see the headlines are "Z0MG WTF BBQ Talibans sh00ted presidant" You'd most likely ignore it since it looks rather fake.
But if they'd present it in a more fashionable way like. President has been shot. And the notes about the talibans would be somewhere else in the article, you'd believe it, right?

Well that's still wrong, you should always lurk more to find out the truth about important matters.

You are one of those people that see something that looks out of place and critises to the EXTREME or Trolls.

The Military Term is Kill / Death Ratio.

In Iraq the Average K/D Ratio to the American Soldier was 16:1

16 dead terrorists, 1 US soldier died.

Since the war started 28,000 insurgents have died (including saddam's iraqi soldiers during the invasion) and almost 19,000 are held by US forces, as well as a further 24,000 by Iraqi security forces. The coalition has suffered 4,500 casualties (roughly split 4,200 US, 180 British, 120 other).
That would give you a ratio of roughly 14 enemy troops killed or captured for every 1 allied death.

Since you are either phenomenally dumb and I have to spell it out for you, or you may have realized what I meant and are simply avoiding responding to me because you realize how dumb you were, the point is that crafting a theory around the least plausible explanation, simply because it's so implausible that nobody would suspect it, is completely idiotic, because you could simply replace the implausible story for another equally implausible story and the argument would stay the same.

These days, you get labeled as a conspiracy theorist for suggesting someone had an ulterior motive for something, no matter how slight.

True, the "Clinton body count" is a conspiracy, but you have to admit, a lot of people dropped dead around. Somebody's got to tell me how Ron Brown died in a plane crash and ended up with a .45 caliber hole in his head...

You are one of those people that see something that looks out of place and critises to the EXTREME or Trolls.

The Military Term is Kill / Death Ratio.

In Iraq the Average K/D Ratio to the American Soldier was 16:1

16 dead terrorists, 1 US soldier died.

Edited:

Exactly the reason why it is the Perfect Crime, nobody will bother to investigate that theory.

16 dead terrorists, 1 US soldier died.

God damnit, people like you drive me insane. You think that all those people the American soldiers killed were terrorists? There aren't that many terrorists in the whole fucking Middle East. They killed a mixture of Taliban insurgents, normal citizens, and political leaders. This whole "War On Terror" was never about terrorists. It's always been about oil, and trying to force our ideals on other people.
Take a fucking current events class.

Since you are either phenomenally dumb and I have to spell it out for you, or you may have realized what I meant and are simply avoiding responding to me because you realize how dumb you were, the point is that crafting a theory around the least plausible explanation, simply because it's so implausible that nobody would suspect it, is completely idiotic, because you could simply replace the implausible story for another equally implausible story and the argument would stay the same.

God damnit, people like you drive me insane. You think that all those people the American soldiers killed were terrorists?

I don't care what you politically correctly call them, If they are an enemy of my Country and Society, They are terrorists. I couldn't care less if they are "technically called ...blah...blah....blah...".

The war in IRAQ was about Oil, Afghanistan war was retaliation from New York and London Terrorist attacks.

Edited:

/thread

Edited:

these treads always end in an arguement, hey, if you think about it the terrorist's got us here too, cuz we are argueing about them.