Well, I noticed you mentioned Carr and Leinart and I started looking at it deeper.

You have to have an "anchor point", some verifiable data that you can use as your baseline. That's the bottom group, where we have a preponderance of verifiable busts.

You don't even really have to discount Carr and Leinart at that point because you're not trying to figure out why they busted. You're looking at it as a somewhat linear percentage chance to bust, proportionally related to their score.

Well, I noticed you mentioned Carr and Leinart and I started looking at it deeper.

You have to have an "anchor point", some verifiable data that you can use as your baseline.

You don't even really have to discount Carr and Leinart at that point because you're not trying to figure out why they busted. You're looking at it as a somewhat linear percentage chance to bust, proportionally related to their score.

he probably had NO IDEA he was supposed to have to memorize this play. I've gone into plenty of interviews and stumbled over what I wanted to say and probably couldn't tell you the 3rd question they asked me after they asked me a 15th question.

if Mooch told him ok, you need to memorize this play and the terminology while he was explaining it, I bet they both would have freaking memorized the play and the terminology.

He forgot a ****ing play that he honestly probably didn't think twice about because he was concentrating on what to say during the interview process...