I'm always astounded that there are still NSDAP partisans.
..."Oh, no, I'm not a NAZI..."
And so, who else wants to defend their crimes?
Why?
If you were to insist that the Red Army in 1918-19 only "did what it had to do," you would be a bolshevik and deserve more than odium.

It's a great tragedy that Germany-Austria lost the first war (they very well could have won with a bit better planning and cooperation).
...a near run thing.
This would have prevented both Adolf (who ought to have been shot for treason) and Lenin (likewise) from doing anything.

Because he shat on Rand in the summer of 2015, for being insufficiently pure.
...and then jumped on the Trumpwagon fall 2015, winter-spring 2016, in an exercise in astonishing hypocrisy.
Tom's a fine historian and economist, but is entirely, hopelessly naive when it comes to current affairs - no spine, no brain: a salamander.
^^^

The irrational fear this has created could be effectively exploited to argue for the elimination of physical schools altogether.
Imagine the teachers' union trying to argue against protecting the children...

To take one example, the commandant of the Auschwitz camp testified to the goings on there, IIRC.
What evidence is there that his testimony was coerced?
And then, apart from such specifics, Hitler and other top party members made numerous public speeches about extermination through the 30s.
Surely no one is denying that the NSDAP was radically anti-semitic?

Yea, there are hordes of monarchists roaming round the country (me and, like, three other guys); they must be stopped!
...that's every droll, but the fact is that there is a large number of borderline retarded persons who now identify with the new nationalism.
Enjoy your company.