Attention!!! Pro Sports Daily will be down on Wednesday morning from 5:00am - 7:00am eastern time for database maintenance. All Sports Direct Inc. properties will be down during this scheduled outage.
Sorry for any inconvenience that this outage may cause.

If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

So Bull is in win or lose, and then pending the outcome of that one we're gonna have either a four way tie for the last 2 playoff spots or a five way tie for the last 3. Which I think then goes to the team(s) with the most total accumulated points over the course of the season. Good news for me. Or atleast it was going into today. I've got 70 ****ing points sitting on my bench.

So Bull is in win or lose, and then pending the outcome of that one we're gonna have either a four way tie for the last 2 playoff spots or a five way tie for the last 3. Which I think then goes to the team(s) with the most total accumulated points over the course of the season. Good news for me. Or atleast it was going into today. I've got 70 ****ing points sitting on my bench.

That's only for 1v1 ties though. When you've got 3, 4, or 5 teams tied with the same record, in my past experience with ESPN, they don't go by who has the best record against the other teams in that tie cluster, they go by total points over the season.

That's only for 1v1 ties though. When you've got 3, 4, or 5 teams tied with the same record, in my past experience with ESPN, they don't go by who has the best record against the other teams in that tie cluster, they go by total points over the season.

lol nah, head to head record is the tie breaker. In my case, i'd have beaten everyone cept for Of Rice and Men with my record... that's why I'm ranked 3rd and (2nd of the 6-4 teams) while the other 2 6-4 teams (with more overall points) are below me. It's not gonna change for the playoffs.

Now, this is pretty much all contingent on Crabtree not going off on MNF and Flacco playing a pretty normal game tonight. But assuming that happens, this is what were looking at. The records in parentheses are that team's record against the other teams within the 5 way tie. I'm assuming (hoping) that I have the tiebreaker over Danny Woodhead because I beat him the only time we faced each other.

Why the heck did you bench Gronk for Gates? Not that it would've mattered in our game, but that move surprised me. Might come into play if points scored is used in the tiebreak.

Side note: At least my team went out on a winning note. If the season was 2 weeks longer I might've had a chance at a playoff spot, but oh well.

Indy had the #1 ranked D in the NFL against tight ends while Denver was ranked dead last at #32, Gronk was supposedly playing a bit hurt, Gates had been getting a lot of love from Rivers lately. Still even with all that I went back and forth on it quite a bit before I made the call.

It is a little comforting to know that even if I had played him and BGE and LSH I still somehow wouldnt've come close to winning.

Yeah, it's always better to lose outright than lose by user error. I'm in a dogfight in my big money league, down by 2...I have the Ravens DST, he has Dwyer. Worst part is I started the Ravens over Packers last second (barf - I know), which cost me a 19 pt performance. I just thought the Lions-Pack would be a shootout. I'm hoping with Leftwich at the helm for the Steelers, the Ravens' D will look a little like the Ravens of old and force some turnovers. Dwyer is in a 3 way split tonight, so I figure if the Ravens can get me 8-10 I should be ok.