Clinton's Biggest Regret and Deception...And Ours

When then-Secretary of StateHillary Clinton exclaimed "At this point does it really matter anymore," regarding the four U.S. citizens-including an ambassador-killed in the Sept. 12, 2012Benghazi, Libya attacks, her words were a reflection of a careless and cruel society, versus one that is politically attentive and historically mindful. Still yet, the newly declassified emails revealing the White House crafted a false narrative for the upcoming 2012 elections mirrors a nation of perpetual deceivers. The talking point emails in question were preps for officials to reassure infotainment listeners and voters that the protest attacks were spontaneous and rooted in an internet video versus a well-planned and coordinated attack by al Qeada, which President Barack Obama claimed to have "decimated." Emails also instructed them to replicate how "there will be challenges, but his foreign policies are successful and, time and again, he has shown that we can meet them."(1) While the White House is denying a cover-up, Hillary Clinton, who plans to run in 2016, recently called the Benghazi terrorist attack her "biggest regret." But a larger regret and tragedy haunts the baby boom and millennial generations now in power. It is geographical and historical illiteracy while having inherited a waning imperial power.(1)

After World War II, Geography as part of the curriculum was replaced by corporate and hegemonic influences, like business and marketing ideologies. The subject that taught students "everything and everywhere" was even discontinued as a core requirement in universities. This meant future generation of citizens and political leaders would be uninformed in the study of the interactions between people and their local and global environments. They would be unable to appropriately analyze, synthesize, apply, and evaluate the causes and effects of global cultures, religions, economies, movements, politics, and histories. The result has been a lack of multicultural perspectives on the world's peoples through an understanding of their differences and commonalities throughout time, space and place. The capacities for critical thinking about the "human condition", along with engaged democratic experiences, will continue to be undermined by ethnocentric views and American Exceptionalism. This not only helps explain the Benghazi, Afghan, and Iraq debacles and regrets, but how even Americans have become expendable too. Unless reversed and liberated by cartographic realities, people will continue to suffer under the weight of armed corporate fears of losing global dominance.

The attack never would have occurred if the Obama Administration would have understood that historical geography was the principal determinant in the development of modern Libya. Since it is primarily a desert and has very few resources, tribal relations are of great importance. Its population of 5 million mixed Arab-Berber ancestry, and a overwhelming majority of Sunni Muslims, has suffered a series of foreign invasions and internal and external migrations. Resentment runs deep as Libyans recall how imperial powers confiscated their lands and crushed independence movements. Libyan legends are based on the exploits of Muslim leaders who resisted the Crusaders or Italian colonizers. It even has a holiday commemorating the U.S. withdrawal from WheelingAir Force Base. While northern Libya faces the Mediterranean, where exact sea lanes and boundaries are still disputed, to the south it is a multi-locked country, sharing borders with Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria, Sudan, Chad, and Niger. Like its neighbors, it too has experienced political, social and religious uprisings, including and an influx of immigrants. Libya became an oil rich nation with the discovery of oil. But it also fell victim to global market forces that have sometimes caused economic hardship.

When ColonelMu'ammar al-Qaddafi (a Bedouin) seized power, he tried to create a distinct Libyan state based on his unique view of Islam. He also broke diplomatic ties with Great Britain and the U.S., nationalizing the oil, banking, and other economic sectors. Under his eccentric rule, he redistributed wealth causing resentment among the very rich. Along with Pan-Arabism, Pan-Africanism and his "Cultural Revolution," he supported the Irish Republican Army, the Basques in Spain, and a Palestinian State. He later initiated Libyanization, where Libyans in large numbers attacked and expelled foreign workers. While Islamic revivalists expressed their dismay with his reforms and brand of Islam, the Reagan Administration shot down a Libyan jet in 1981. The same administration mistakenly believed that by continually sanctioning and targeting Qaddafi and Libya, in Bedouin culture his leadership would be diminished.(2) More attacks, one killing 100 Libyans, and publicly ridiculing Qaddafi, considered awfully disrespectful,(3) only caused more dislike and hatred towards U.S. foreign policy and its military. Although Qaddafi finally denounced terrorism and sought better relations with the U.S., an American consulate would always be suspect and in danger for some time.

Benghazi is an urban focus in Libya and has been influenced by many nationalities and histories. With its contiguous interactions with Egypt, it has been a focal point for Islamic revivalists and militant Islamists for years. Many have fed on the crimes against the Arab world and Islam, such as Europe's occupation of Arab lands and the establishment of the state of Israel. Since some see themselves as the embodiment of Arab defiance of Israel, of the West, and of history itself, decades of U.S. foreign policy and military blunders merely added fuel to an already volatile region, also known as the "mecca of freedom fighters." The U.S.-NATO push to rid Libya of Qaddafi, even siding with al-Qaeda factions to do so, backfired when on September 11, 2012, Islamist revivalists and militants attacked the American consulate killing ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. In reality, they were victims of a series of American rulers who committed unpardonable sins against their own people. One being geographically and historically illiterate. The other dealt with being dishonest and deceptive. In this case, it was so Obama could win the election, something he did not deserve.(4) When Americans were being sodomized and tortured in Benghazi, he was not even in the Situation Room.

Clinton was recently asked about her biggest regret and claimed it was the Benghazi attack. "It's very, very painful," she said, "and it was certainly the biggest regret that I had as Secretary of State." She also mentioned that even though they weren't the only people killed, "...we lost them in such a terrible, senseless, terrorist action that, you know, it's just deeply sorrowful and it went on for hours..." Her comments are in sharp contrast to her defiant and elitist congressional testimony ("what difference does it make" comment) while appearing before the SenateForeign Affairs Committee just months after the attack. Is Clinton now trying to distance herself from the Obama Doctrine? Does she realize the "smoking gun" has been found and the truth about the attacks will eventually be made public? Or is she truly being sincere? (She might also be concerned over CIA directorMichael Morell's testimony. He said the CIA never connected the video to Benghazi, as she and the Obama Administration continually claimed.) Her biggest regret also indicts Americans. They are complicit for not confronting their own democratic illiteracy and mass self-deception. It is easier to recognize the hypocrisies of others instead of one's own. Whereas facts require democratic thought and engagement, fantasies do not.

Therefore, Americans must be prepared to challenge and confront their own duplicity in manufacturing, exporting, and then consuming decades of their-and their elected leaders-preemptive wars and armed interventions timed with the notion of either influencing elections and public opinion, or when Congress was about to debate and consider cutting the Pentagon's military budget. If democracy depends on an informed populace, then maintaining freedom and liberty depends on historical realities and geographical and global validations. Blaming the government for having lied and deceived its own people is only a partial truth. The other, being, an illiterate citizenry that practices the art of self-deception and collusion. From those killed in Benghazi to the thousands of troops that have died in Iraq and Afghanistan, Americans are not helpless victims. But they are historically disengaged and geographically illiterate, which is why there are no demands for accountability and honesty towards elected leaders. Changing the cultural and public education market place into more intensive pedagogies, like Geography and History, will prevent future regrets and deceptions. It will also help avert more senseless killing.

Libya made arrangements to compensate the victims' families in the Lockerbie bombing. As for the four killed in the Benghazi attacks, who will compensate them? Especially since an investigation blamed the U.S. StateDepartment for "systematic failures and leadership and management deficiencies" for not only securing the compound, but denying requests for security by personnel stationed there.(5) The greatest compensation for them and the American people would be to start questioning their political and military leaders-and their own-faulty thinking and foreign policies, namely the jinns(6) of American Exceptionalism and global domination, and to examine things before committing them to action. An accurate view of "everything and everywhere", or historical geography, would begin such a process and guard against future regrets and deceptions. It would also provide a more secure environment at home and abroad.

Related News

A 2016 Presidential Poll has Hillary Clinton winning despite the former Secretary of State’s bungling of the Benghazi situation. As previously reported by The Inquisitr, a 2016 Presidential Poll shows that Hillary Clinton would defeat any Republican challengers, even rising GOP star Chris Christie, the New Jersey governor who led his state with aplomb during Superstorm Sandy....

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has upped his already harsh rhetoric against outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, claiming that she "got away with murder" in the Benghazi, Libya, attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. "I haven't forgotten about Benghazi. Hillary Clinton got away with murder, in my view," Graham said on Fox News Monday...

A senior House Democrat wants Republicans to retract a report blaming former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton for security deficiencies before the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya. Congressman Elijah Cummings of Maryland is asking House Speaker John Boehner to retract the report. Cummings sent a...

President Obama and Hillary Clinton spent most of their joint "60 Minutes" interview on Sunday heaping praise on each other. But Obama also took a second to laughingly brush off a question about Clinton's political intentions. (Jump to 13:30 in the video above to watch). Interviewer Steve Kroft...

Just before House Government Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) began a potentially explosive hearing Wednesday on the 2012 attacks on the U.S. consulate Benghazi, Libya, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) said he was satisfied with the information he had received. "I feel like I know what happened in Benghazi. I'm fairly satisfied," Corker said...

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is returning to the public stage with her first speaking events since leaving the Obama administration. Clinton is scheduled to speak Tuesday at the Vital Voices Global Leadership Awards in Washington, D.C., an event honoring women...

Hillary Clinton Testifying On Benghazi Attack For Third Time - Trey Gowdy - On The Record

published:16 Jul 2015

Hillary Clinton Testifying On Benghazi Attack For Third Time - Trey Gowdy - On The Record

Hillary Clinton Testifying On Benghazi Attack For Third Time - Trey Gowdy - On The Record

published:16 Jul 2015

views:3

Hillary Clinton Testifying On Benghazi Attack For Third Time - Trey Gowdy - On The RecordBenghazi Attack Whistleblowers Silenced? Atty: White House Threatening Whistleblowers Benghazi Attack Whistleblowers To Testify On Benghazi Hearing May ...
Trey Gowdy destroys Hillary Clinton and NY Times on Benghazi.
Rep. Trey Gowdy on Sunday refuted assertions that his House investigative committee has become a political tool for national Republicans and that the panel\'s ...
Hillary Clinton Testifying On Benghazi Attack For Third Time - Trey Gowdy - On The Record =========================================== **Please ...
After Hillary Clinton refused to privately testify about her email use before the congressional committee investigating the attacks in Benghazi, her campaign ......

Hillary Clinton Testifying On Benghazi Attack For Third Time - Trey Gowdy - On The Record

published:16 Jul 2015

views:3

Hillary Clinton Testifying On Benghazi Attack For Third Time - Trey Gowdy - On The RecordBenghazi Attack Whistleblowers Silenced? Atty: White House Threatening Whistleblowers Benghazi Attack Whistleblowers To Testify On Benghazi Hearing May ...
Trey Gowdy destroys Hillary Clinton and NY Times on Benghazi.
Rep. Trey Gowdy on Sunday refuted assertions that his House investigative committee has become a political tool for national Republicans and that the panel\'s ...
Hillary Clinton Testifying On Benghazi Attack For Third Time - Trey Gowdy - On The Record =========================================== **Please ...
After Hillary Clinton refused to privately testify about her email use before the congressional committee investigating the attacks in Benghazi, her campaign ......

The chairman of a House panel investigating the deadly 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, complained Tuesday that his committee should have received emails ...
Rep. Trey Gowdy suggested that Congress may go to court to get Hillary Clinton\'s private server if suspicions over her emails continue. Former Secretary of State ...
Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.), Fox News Sunday, 3-15-2015.
Bob Beckel lost it today on The Five. The inhouse leftist pounded the desk, admitted Benghazi was a coverup and says, \"So What?\"
It\'s one thing for a politician to be stupid, which Hillary Clinton is not, it\'s quite another for a politician to believe that we\'re stupid; and that is deflating,” Remnick ...
Benghazi Panel Releases Subpoena Hillary Clinton Claimed S
Benghazi Panel Releases Subpoena Hillary Clinton Claimed She Never Received - America\'s Newsroom
Benghazi Panel Releases Subpoena Hillary Clinton Claimed She Never Received - America\'s Newsroom...

The chairman of a House panel investigating the deadly 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, complained Tuesday that his committee should have received emails ...
Rep. Trey Gowdy suggested that Congress may go to court to get Hillary Clinton\'s private server if suspicions over her emails continue. Former Secretary of State ...
Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.), Fox News Sunday, 3-15-2015.
Bob Beckel lost it today on The Five. The inhouse leftist pounded the desk, admitted Benghazi was a coverup and says, \"So What?\"
It\'s one thing for a politician to be stupid, which Hillary Clinton is not, it\'s quite another for a politician to believe that we\'re stupid; and that is deflating,” Remnick ...
Benghazi Panel Releases Subpoena Hillary Clinton Claimed S
Benghazi Panel Releases Subpoena Hillary Clinton Claimed She Never Received - America\'s Newsroom
Benghazi Panel Releases Subpoena Hillary Clinton Claimed She Never Received - America\'s Newsroom...

Does Clinton Email Report ‘Breathe New Life’ into Benghazi Investigation?

published:11 Jul 2015

Does Clinton Email Report ‘Breathe New Life’ into Benghazi Investigation?

Does Clinton Email Report ‘Breathe New Life’ into Benghazi Investigation?

published:11 Jul 2015

views:0

Does Clinton Email Report ‘Breathe New Life’ into Benghazi Investigation?
Last night the New York Times ed that Hillary Clinton had used a personal email address while Secretary of State, meaning portions of her correspondence were potentially not archived by the department per federal regulations.
The discovery was made by the Benghazi Select Committee, to which Clinton submitted about 300 emails as part of its investigation into the 2012 attack on the American consulate in Libya. The revelation of Clinton’s personal email account and the possibility that it portends of an unknown number of emails not captured by the State Department’s system would appear to be the exact sort of treasure trove for which committee head Trey Gowdy (R-SC) was looking.
“I think a lot of people roll our eyes at this Benghazi investigation — like enough already, we’re flogging a horse that is not only dead but buried,” Politico’s foreign affairs correspondent Michael Crowley said on Morning Joe Tuesday. “But suddenly this breathes new life into this Benghazi investigation: ‘look, we’re finding secret private e-mail account! What’s in it?’ That’s terrible news for her.”
RELATED: Times Reporter Breaks Down Clinton Email Story: Feeds into Narrative of ‘Secrecy’
“This was uncovered, basically, by the Benghazi committee,” said Beth Fouhy, MSNBC.com’s senior editor, on Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell last night. “Democrats and opponents about the Benghazi committee have been saying they’re wasting their time. This is just political, this is just redundant. And yet, we have an example of somethin...

Does Clinton Email Report ‘Breathe New Life’ into Benghazi Investigation?

published:11 Jul 2015

views:0

Does Clinton Email Report ‘Breathe New Life’ into Benghazi Investigation?
Last night the New York Times ed that Hillary Clinton had used a personal email address while Secretary of State, meaning portions of her correspondence were potentially not archived by the department per federal regulations.
The discovery was made by the Benghazi Select Committee, to which Clinton submitted about 300 emails as part of its investigation into the 2012 attack on the American consulate in Libya. The revelation of Clinton’s personal email account and the possibility that it portends of an unknown number of emails not captured by the State Department’s system would appear to be the exact sort of treasure trove for which committee head Trey Gowdy (R-SC) was looking.
“I think a lot of people roll our eyes at this Benghazi investigation — like enough already, we’re flogging a horse that is not only dead but buried,” Politico’s foreign affairs correspondent Michael Crowley said on Morning Joe Tuesday. “But suddenly this breathes new life into this Benghazi investigation: ‘look, we’re finding secret private e-mail account! What’s in it?’ That’s terrible news for her.”
RELATED: Times Reporter Breaks Down Clinton Email Story: Feeds into Narrative of ‘Secrecy’
“This was uncovered, basically, by the Benghazi committee,” said Beth Fouhy, MSNBC.com’s senior editor, on Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell last night. “Democrats and opponents about the Benghazi committee have been saying they’re wasting their time. This is just political, this is just redundant. And yet, we have an example of somethin...

confirmed that the Obama Administration ran guns from Benghazi

published:10 Jul 2015

confirmed that the Obama Administration ran guns from Benghazi

confirmed that the Obama Administration ran guns from Benghazi

published:10 Jul 2015

views:2

confirmed that the Obama Administration ran guns from Benghazi to Syria before the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and 3 other Americans.
The report reveals that U.S. Intelligence agencies were fully aware that weapons were moving from the terrorist stronghold in Libya to Syria before the attack that killed four Americans. It also ties the attack to the 9-11 terrorist attacks, and puts to rest the Obama/Clinton narrative that the attack was a \"spontaneous demonstration caused by a YouTube video.\"...

confirmed that the Obama Administration ran guns from Benghazi

published:10 Jul 2015

views:2

confirmed that the Obama Administration ran guns from Benghazi to Syria before the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and 3 other Americans.
The report reveals that U.S. Intelligence agencies were fully aware that weapons were moving from the terrorist stronghold in Libya to Syria before the attack that killed four Americans. It also ties the attack to the 9-11 terrorist attacks, and puts to rest the Obama/Clinton narrative that the attack was a \"spontaneous demonstration caused by a YouTube video.\"...

“Four Americans lost their lives in this terrorist attack, and the American people deserve the truth,” House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said today, saying former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the State Department are prolonging the House’s fact-driven investigation into the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya....

“Four Americans lost their lives in this terrorist attack, and the American people deserve the truth,” House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said today, saying former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the State Department are prolonging the House’s fact-driven investigation into the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya....

Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul said on Fox News’ America’s Newsroom that there was a “very good chance” that Hillary Clinton lied when she testified to Senate Foreign Relations Committee that she didn’t know anything about arms transfers to and from Libya.
When questioned by Paul in 2013, Clinton claimed not to know anything about any arms deals being brokered from the Benghazi consulate attacked on September 11, 2012. But reporting from Fox’ Catherine Herridge last month indicated that “the United States supported the secret supply of weapons to Libyan rebels while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.”
“I find it very hard to believe Hillary Clinton didn’t know,” Paul told host Bill Hemmer. “In fact, she was the biggest cheerleader for sending these arms and redistributing these arms into Syrian rebels [sic].”
Paul noted the issue was important because many of the arms could have found their way into the arms of American enemies. ”I don’t think our public officials should be allowed to come before congressional committees and lie,” he said.
“Well you dropped the l-word,” Hemmer said. “Was she lying, Senator?”
“I think there is a very good chance,” he responded. “Because I think there is no way that Hillary Clinton did not know about this. Her private emails show that she was the one supporting arming these people.”...

Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul said on Fox News’ America’s Newsroom that there was a “very good chance” that Hillary Clinton lied when she testified to Senate Foreign Relations Committee that she didn’t know anything about arms transfers to and from Libya.
When questioned by Paul in 2013, Clinton claimed not to know anything about any arms deals being brokered from the Benghazi consulate attacked on September 11, 2012. But reporting from Fox’ Catherine Herridge last month indicated that “the United States supported the secret supply of weapons to Libyan rebels while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.”
“I find it very hard to believe Hillary Clinton didn’t know,” Paul told host Bill Hemmer. “In fact, she was the biggest cheerleader for sending these arms and redistributing these arms into Syrian rebels [sic].”
Paul noted the issue was important because many of the arms could have found their way into the arms of American enemies. ”I don’t think our public officials should be allowed to come before congressional committees and lie,” he said.
“Well you dropped the l-word,” Hemmer said. “Was she lying, Senator?”
“I think there is a very good chance,” he responded. “Because I think there is no way that Hillary Clinton did not know about this. Her private emails show that she was the one supporting arming these people.”...

Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton Was Lying to Congress on Benghazi

published:08 Jul 2015

Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton Was Lying to Congress on Benghazi

Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton Was Lying to Congress on Benghazi

published:08 Jul 2015

views:23

Sen. Rand Paul just gave possibly his best interview ever. The Kentucky senator and presidential candidate told FOX News Hillary Clinton was caught lying to Congress on arming terrorists with US weapons....

Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton Was Lying to Congress on Benghazi

published:08 Jul 2015

views:23

Sen. Rand Paul just gave possibly his best interview ever. The Kentucky senator and presidential candidate told FOX News Hillary Clinton was caught lying to Congress on arming terrorists with US weapons....

Benghazi night call between Clinton and Obama withheld, documents show

published:08 Jul 2015

Benghazi night call between Clinton and Obama withheld, documents show

Benghazi night call between Clinton and Obama withheld, documents show

published:08 Jul 2015

views:4

New documents released by a federal court show President Obama called then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the night of the 2012 Benghazi attack -- but .
Details Of Benghazi Call Between Pres Obama vesves SECY Clinton Withheld - State Dept Clinton Email Document Dump - Americas Newsroom .
Trey Gowdy Claims to have Evidence Of A Systematic, Intentional Decision To Withhold Documents From Congress on Benghazi Read More at .
.
It Does Make A Difference . Hillary Clintons Role In Benghazi Fiasco Under Scrutiny Benghazi Scandal - Where Was Obama? - Visitor Logs Show He Had ....

Benghazi night call between Clinton and Obama withheld, documents show

published:08 Jul 2015

views:4

New documents released by a federal court show President Obama called then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the night of the 2012 Benghazi attack -- but .
Details Of Benghazi Call Between Pres Obama vesves SECY Clinton Withheld - State Dept Clinton Email Document Dump - Americas Newsroom .
Trey Gowdy Claims to have Evidence Of A Systematic, Intentional Decision To Withhold Documents From Congress on Benghazi Read More at .
.
It Does Make A Difference . Hillary Clintons Role In Benghazi Fiasco Under Scrutiny Benghazi Scandal - Where Was Obama? - Visitor Logs Show He Had ....

The chairman of a House panel investigating the deadly 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, complained Tuesday that his committee should have received emails ...
Rep. Trey Gowdy suggested that Congress may go to court to get Hillary Clinton\'s private server if suspicions over her emails continue. Form

Does Clinton Email Report ‘Breathe New Life’ into Benghazi Investigation?
Last night the New York Times ed that Hillary Clinton had used a personal email address while Secretary of State, meaning portions of her correspondence were potentially not archived by the department per federal regulations.

confirmed that the Obama Administration ran guns from Benghazi to Syria before the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and 3 other Americans.
The report reveals that U.S. Intelligence agencies were fully aware that weapons were moving

“Four Americans lost their lives in this terrorist attack, and the American people deserve the truth,” House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said today, saying former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the State Department are prolonging the House’s fact-driven investigation into the terrorist attac

Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul said on Fox News’ America’s Newsroom that there was a “very good chance” that Hillary Clinton lied when she testified to Senate Foreign Relations Committee that she didn’t know anything about arms transfers to and from Libya.
When questioned by Paul in 20

Sen. Rand Paul just gave possibly his best interview ever. The Kentucky senator and presidential candidate told FOX News Hillary Clinton was caught lying to Congress on arming terrorists with US weapons.

New documents released by a federal court show President Obama called then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the night of the 2012 Benghazi attack -- but .
Details Of Benghazi Call Between Pres Obama vesves SECY Clinton Withheld - State Dept Clinton Email Document Dump - Americas Newsroom .
Tr

How long will Republicans keep up this charade? http://hrc.io/1R36iMn
---
Sign up here to get involved: http://hrc.io/1R36iMn
Subscribe to The Briefing Youtube channel: http://hrc.io/1HtlY52
Like The Briefing on Facebook: http://hrc.io/1dPDO6R
Follow The Briefing on Twitter: http://hrc.io/1IRwNhU

On Wednesday the State Department confirmed that executive privilege was enacted on a \"small\" amount of emails provided by former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to the Benghazi Select Committee through the State Department. State Department Spokesman John Kirby confirmed that the Departme

New documents released by a federal court show President Obama called then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the night of the 2012 Benghazi attack -- but the contents are being withheld by the State Department.
It had previously been disclosed that Clinton and Obama spoke the night of the terr

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-South Carolina, urges the State Department to release the remainder of Hillary Clinton’s emails pertaining to the Benghazi investigation he is leading in the House of Representatives.

– An ISIS operative suspected of involvement in the 2012 attack on the US diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya, has been killed in a US airstrike in Iraq, the Pentagon says. Ali Awni al-Harzi operated closely with ISIS-associated extremists \"throughout North Africa and the Middle East,\" a Defense D

The American diplomatic mission at Benghazi, in Libya, was attacked on September 11, 2012 by a heavily armed group. The attack began during the night at a compound that is meant to protect the consulate building. A second assault in the early morning the next day targeted a nearby CIA annex in a different diplomatic compound. Four people were killed, including U.S. AmbassadorJ. Christopher Stevens. Ten others were injured. The attack was strongly condemned by the governments of Libya, the United States, and many other countries throughout the world.

Many Libyans praised the late ambassador and staged public demonstrations against the militias.[5][6] The Libyan government also began attempts to disband many of the groups.[7] The United States increased security worldwide at its various diplomatic and military facilities and began investigating the attack.[8][9] Initially, there was speculation that the attacks were a spontaneous response to a video, Innocence of Muslims,[10][11] but the Accountability Review Board found that it was in fact a premeditated attack by Islamist militants.[12] The Republican Party accused the Obama administration of over-emphasizing the role of the video,[13] took issue with the investigation,[13] and the response of Secretary of StateHillary Clinton.[14] The mainstream American media faced criticism for the way it framed reports on the attacks, and there were many claims of bias by politicians on all sides of the political spectrum.[15]

In the aftermath of the attack, investigators identified more than a dozen violent events in Benghazi during the previous six months. On October 2, 2012, three weeks after the attacks, Darrell Issa (R-CA, chairman of the Committee) and Jason Chaffetz (R-UT, chairman of the subcommittee on National Security, Homeland Defense, and Foreign Operations) sent a letter to Secretary of State Clinton which listed a number of these events—including car jackings, kidnappings, assassination attempts, and gun battles. The letter stated, "Put together, .these events indicated a clear pattern of security threats that could only be reasonably interpreted to justify increased security for U.S. personnel and facilities in Benghazi.".[16]

In April 2012, two former security guards for the consulate threw a homemade "fish bomb" IED over the consulate fence; the incident did not cause any casualties.[17] Just 4 days later, a similar bomb was thrown at a four vehicle convoy carrying the United Nations Special Envoy to Libya, exploding just 12 feet from the UN envoy’s vehicle without injuring anyone.[18]

In May 2012 an Al-Qaida affiliate calling itself the Imprisoned Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades claimed responsibility for an attack on the International Red Cross (ICRC) office in Benghazi. On August 6 the ICRC suspended operations in Benghazi. The head of the ICRC's delegation in Libya said the aid group was "appalled" by the attack and "extremely concerned" about escalating violence in Libya.[19]

The Imprisoned Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades released a video of what it said was its detonation of an explosive device outside the gates of the U.S. consulate on June 5, which caused no casualties but damaged the consulate's perimeter wall,[20][21] described by one individual as "big enough for forty men to go through."[16] The Brigades claimed that the attack was in response to the killing of Abu Yahya al Libi, a Libyan al-Qaeda leader who had just died in an American drone attack, and was also timed to coincide with the imminent arrival of a U.S. diplomat.[22][23] There were no injuries, but the group left behind leaflets promising more attacks against the U.S.[24]

British ambassador to Libya Dominic Asquith survived an assassination attempt in Benghazi on June 10. Two British protection officers were injured in the attack when their convoy was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade 300 yards from their consulate office.[25] The British Foreign Office withdrew all consular staff from Benghazi in late June.[26][27][28]

After the attack, CNN reported that a Benghazi security official and a battalion commander had met with U.S. diplomats three days before the attack and had warned the Americans about deteriorating security in the area. The official told CNN that the diplomats had been advised, "The situation is frightening, it scares us."[32]

On September 14, CNN correspondent Arwa Damon found Ambassador Stevens' diary at the unsecured site of the attack. In it, Stevens expressed his concern about the growing al-Qaeda presence in the area and his worry about being on an al-Qaeda hit list. The U.S. State Department later accused CNN of violating privacy and breaking its promise to Stevens' family that it would not report on the diary.[33]

The Benghazi attack consisted of military assaults on two separate U.S. diplomatic compounds. The first assault occurred at the main compound, approximately 300 yards long and 100 yards wide, at about 9:40 pm local time (3:40 pm EDT, Washington DC). The second assault took place at a CIA annex 1.2 miles away at about 4 am the following morning.[34] It has been referred to as the Battle of Benghazi.[35][36][37][38]

The assault began at nightfall, with the attackers sealing off streets leading to the main compound with gun trucks.[39] The trucks bore the logo of Ansar al-Shariah, a group of Islamist militants working with the local government to manage security in Benghazi.[39]

The area outside the compound before the assault was quiet; one Libyan guard who was wounded in the attack was quoted as saying “there wasn’t a single ant outside.”[40] There was no sign of a spontaneous protest against an American-made movie denigrating Islam's Prophet Muhammad. But a lawyer passing by the scene said he saw the militants gathering around 20 youths from nearby to chant against the film."[39] No more than seven Americans were in the compound, including Ambassador Stevens, who was visiting Benghazi at the time to review plans to establish a new cultural center and modernize a hospital.[45] Ambassador Stevens had his last meeting of the day with a Turkish diplomat and escorted him to the main gate at about 8:30 pm (local time). The street outside the compound was calm; the State Department reported no unusual activity during the day outside.[46] Ambassador Stevens retired to his room about 9 pm; he was alone in the building, according to guards interviewed later.[47]

About 9:40 pm (local time) large numbers of armed men shouting "Allāhu Akbar" descended on the compound from multiple directions.[40][48] The attackers lobbed grenades over the wall and entered the compound under a barrage of automatic weapons fire and RPGs, backed by truck-mounted artillery and anti-aircraft machine guns.[39][47] A Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) agent viewed on the consulate's security cameras "a large number of men, armed men, flowing into the compound."[46] He hit the alarm and started shouting, “Attack! Attack!” over the loudspeaker.[49] Phone calls were made to the embassy in Tripoli, the Diplomatic Security Command Center in Washington, the Libyan February 17 Brigade, and a U.S. quick reaction force located at a second compound (the annex) a little more than a mile away.[41][50] Ambassador Stevens telephoned Deputy Chief of Mission Gregory Hicks in Tripoli to tell him the consulate was under attack. Mr. Hicks did not recognize the phone number so he didn't answer it, twice. On the third attempt Mr. Hicks answered the call from Ambassador Stevens.[51]

Diplomatic Security Service Special Agent Scott Strickland secured Ambassador Stevens and Sean Smith, an information management officer, in the main building's safe haven.[50][52] Other agents retrieved their M4 carbines and tactical gear from another building. They tried to return to the main building but encountered armed attackers and retreated.[50]

The attackers entered the main building and rattled the locked metal grille of the safe haven.[49] They carried jerrycans of diesel fuel, spread the fuel over the floor and furniture, and set fires.[49][50] As thick smoke filled the building, Stevens, Smith, and Strickland moved to the bathroom and lay on the floor, but they decided to leave the safe haven after being overcome by smoke.[52] Strickland exited through the window, but Stevens and Smith did not follow him. Strickland returned back several times but couldn't find them in the smoke; he went up to the roof and radioed other agents.[52]

Three agents returned to the main building in an armored vehicle; they searched the building and found Smith's body, but not Stevens.[52]

A quick reaction force from the CIA annex arrived and attempted to secure the perimeter and locate the ambassador but were unable to find Stevens in the smoke-filled building. The team then decided to return to the annex with the survivors and Smith's body. While en route back to the annex, the group's armored vehicle was hit by AK-47 rifle fire and hand grenades. The vehicle was able to make it to its destination with two flat tires, however.[34]

Abdel-Monem Al-Hurr, the spokesman for Libya's Supreme Security Committee, said roads leading to the Benghazi consulate compound were sealed off and Libyan state security forces had surrounded it.[53]

Diplomatic Security Service agents/Regional Security Officers informed their headquarters in Washington about the attack just as it was beginning at about 9:40 local time (3:40PM Eastern Time). By 4:30 Eastern, Pentagon officials informed Defense Secretary Leon Panetta about the attack. The Pentagon ordered an unmanned aerial vehicle that was in the air conducting surveillance on militant camps to fly over Benghazi. The drone arrived at 5:11 and began providing a video feed to Washington. At 5:41, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton telephoned CIA Director David Petraeus to coordinate. The CIA, which made up most of the US government's presence in Benghazi, had a ten-member security team at its annex and the State Department believed that this team would assist the consulate in the event of an attack.[54]

At about 1 am the body of Ambassador Stevens was found by local citizens and taken to the Benghazi Medical Center. At the hospital Stevens was administered CPR for 90 minutes by Dr. Ziad Abu Zeid.[55] According to Abu Zeid, Stevens died from asphyxiation caused by smoke inhalation. A 22-year-old freelance videographer, Fahd al-Bakoush, later published a video[56] showing Libyans trying to extract the unconscious ambassador from a smoke-filled room,[57][58] where he was found unconscious, which confirms reports that suggested the U.S. envoy died of asphyxiation after the building was set afire.[59]

Some of the Libyans who entered the compound tried to rescue Stevens after they found him lying alone on the floor in a dark smoke-filled room with a locked door accessible only by a window. A group of men pulled him out of the room through the window, and then placed him on the courtyard's stone tile floor. The crowd cheered "God is great" when Stevens was found to be alive. He was then rushed to the hospital in a private car as there was no ambulance to carry him.[60]

Dr. Ziad Abu Zeid, the Libyan doctor who treated Stevens, said Stevens died of severe asphyxiation, that Stevens had no other injuries, and that he tried for 45 minutes to revive him.[61] The doctor said he believed that officers from the Libyan Interior Ministry transported the body to the airport and into United States custody. State Department officials said they do not know who took Stevens to the hospital or transported the body to the airport and into U.S. custody.[61]

After the consulate attack and before the annex attack, Libyan government forces met up with a group of Americans (believed to be eight reinforcements from Tripoli including Glen Doherty[62]) that had arrived at the Benghazi airport and went with them to the CIA annex at about 4am to assist in transporting approximately 32 Americans at the annex back to the airport for evacuation. As they were at the annex arranging for the transportation back to the airport a single shot rang out, quickly followed by RPGs and then a mortar that hit the annex roof killing Doherty and Tyrone Woods while operating their machine gun.[63] 31-year-old David Ubben suffered shrapnel injuries and several broken bones. According to Ubben's father, "The first [mortar] dropped 50 yards short and the next two were right on target.".[64]

After the attack, all diplomatic staff were moved to the capital, Tripoli, with nonessential personnel to be flown out of Libya. Sensitive documents remained missing, including documents listing the names of Libyans working with the Americans, and documents relating to oil contracts.[65]

Initial reports indicated that ten Libyan guards died; this was later retracted and it was reported that seven Libyans were injured.[74] Three Americans were injured in the attack and treated at an American Military Hospital in Germany.[75]

Doherty was a member of the advisory board of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, an organization that opposes proselytizing by religious groups in the United States military.[81] Doherty was coauthor of the book The 21st Century Sniper.[81][82]

David Kirkpatrick of the New York Times reported that 20-year-old neighbor Mohamed Bishari witnessed the attack. According to Bishari, it was launched without warning or protest and was led by the Islamist militia Ansar al-Shariah (designated by the U.N. and the U.S. Department of State as a terrorist organization). Kirkpatrick reported that Ansar al-Sharia said they were launching the assault in retaliation for the release of the anti-Islamic video, Innocence of Muslims.[93][94] It was further reported that Ahmed Abu Khattala was called a ringleader of the attack by both witnesses and authorities, though he insisted he did not play a part in the aggression at the American compound. Witnesses, Benghazi residents, and Western news reports have described him as a leader of Ansar al-Sharia, though he stated he was close to the group but not an official part of it. He further stated he was the commander of an Islamist brigade, Abu Obaida ibn al-Jarrah, some of who's members had joined Ansar al-Sharia.[95] In October 2012, a Tunisian Ali Harzi, who a US intelligence official stated had links to Ansar al-Sharia and al-Qaeda in the Maghreb, was arrested in Turkey and repatriated to Tunisia on terrorism charges and possible links to the attack on the US embassy in Benghazi.[96] In the same month, a Libyan suspect Karim el-Azizi, who had recently returned to Egypt from Libya and was storing weapons in his hideout, detonated a bomb and was found dead in his apartment after clashes with security forces.[97] Ali Harzi was released by Tunisian authorities on January 8, 2013 due to lack of evidence.[98]

The Imprisoned Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades, a pro-al-Qaeda militia calling for the release of The Blind Sheik, was implicated in the attack by Noman Benotman of the Quilliam Foundation.[1][99][100]CNN,[1] the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,[101]Commentary Magazine[100] and The Daily Telegraph[99] have listed this group as a chief suspect. USA Today reported that protests in Cairo which preceeded the attack on Benghazi were intended to protest the imprisonment of Sheik Omar Abdul Rahman and announced as early as August 30.[102][103] Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi had called for release of the Blind Sheikh in his inaugural address.[103] According to Joan Neuhaus Schaan of the James Baker Institute, "The primary reason for the focus on the video was likely to cast the Americans’ deaths as an unfortunate and unforeseen incident resulting from an inflamed crowd. That video story redirected the debate from scrutinizing our Libyan policies that were supporting known extremists, to a debate centered on blasphemy."[103]

President Obama and one senior administration official have stated that the video was an excuse for the attack. Two days after the attack, CNN reporter Sarah Aarthun quoted an anonymous senior U.S. administration official: "It was not an innocent mob. The video or 9/11 made a handy excuse and could be fortuitous from their perspective but this was a clearly planned military-type attack."[104] In his September 18 appearance on The Late Show with David Letterman, President Obama said that "extremists and terrorists used (the anti-Muslim YouTube video) as an excuse to attack a variety of our embassies."[11] In his Univision Town Hall appearance on September 20, President Obama said that the "natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests."[105]

Libyan Prime MinisterMustafa Abushagur's office condemned the attack and extended condolences, saying: "While strongly condemning any attempt to abuse the person of Muhammad, or an insult to our holy places and prejudice against the faith, we reject and strongly condemn the use of force to terrorise innocent people and the killing of innocent people." It also reaffirmed "the depth of relationship between the peoples of Libya and the U.S., which grew closer with the positions taken by the U.S. government in support of the revolution of February 17."[106]Mohamed Yousef el-Magariaf, the President of the General National Congress of Libya, said: "We apologise to the United States, the people and to the whole world for what happened. We confirm that no-one will escape from punishment and questioning."[107]

There were demonstrations in Benghazi[108] and Tripoli[109] on September 12, condemning the violence and holding signs such as "Chris Stevens was a friend to all Libyans," "Benghazi is against terrorism," and other signs apologizing to Americans for the actions in their name and in the name of Muslims. On the same day, Libya's Deputy Ambassador to London Ahmad Jibril told the BBC that Ansar Al-Sharia was behind the attack. [110][111] On September 13, at a US State Department reception in Washington D.C., the Libyan ambassador to the US Ali Aujali apologized to Secretary of State Clinton for “this terrorist attack which took place against the American consulate in Libya.”[112][113] The ambassador further praised Stevens as a "dear friend" and a "real hero". He also urged the United States to continue supporting Libya as it went "through a very difficult time" and that the young Libyan government needed help so that it could "maintain...security and stability in our country."

In the days after the attack, The New York Times stated that young Libyans had flooded Twitter with pro-American messages after the attacks.[109]Think Progress stated that Libyans are typically more positively inclined towards the United States than their neighbors.[114] A 2012 Gallup poll noted that "A majority of Libyans (54%) surveyed in March and April 2012 approve of the leadership of the U.S. – among the highest approval Gallup has ever recorded in the... region, outside of Israel." [115] Another poll in Eastern Libya, taken in 2011, reported that the population was at the same time both deeply religious conservative Muslims and very pro-American, with 90% of respondents reporting favorable views of the United States.[116][117]

The Libyan response to the crisis was praised and appreciated in the United States, and President Obama emphasized how the Libyans "helped our diplomats to safety" to an American audience the following day,[5] while a New York Times editorial criticized Egypt's government for not doing "what Libyan leaders did." [118]

On September 16, Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf said that the attack on the U.S. consulate was planned months in advance[119], and further stated that “[t]he idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous. We firmly believe that this was a precalculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. consulate.”[120]

On September 21, about 30,000 Libyans marched through Benghazi calling for support of the rule of law and for an end to armed militias.[6][121] Carrying signs with slogans such as "We Want Justice For Chris" and "Libya Lost a Friend," the protestors stormed several militia headquarters, including that of Ansar al-Sharia, an Islamist militia who some allege played a role in the attack on U.S. diplomatic personnel on September 11.[122][123] At least 10 people were killed and dozens more wounded as militiamen fired on demonstrators at the headquarters of Sahaty Brigade, a pro-government militia "operating under the authority of the ministry of defence."[6][123][124]

By early next morning, the protestors had forced militia members to flee and seized control of a number of compounds, releasing four prisoners found inside.[122][123] Protesters burnt a car and a building of at least one facility, and looted weapons.[6][121][123] The militia compounds and many weapons were handed over to Libya's national army[121] in what "appeared to be part of a coordinated sweep of militia bases by police, government troops and activists" following the earlier demonstrations.[122][123] Some militia members accused the protestors of being Qaddafi loyalists, looking to disarm the militias in the wake of the revolution.[121]

On September 23, taking advantage of the growing momentum and rising anger against the militias evinced in the earlier anti-militia demonstrations,[125] the Libyan president declared that all unauthorized militias had 48 hours to either disband or come under government control.[126][7] The government also mandated that bearing arms in public was now illegal, as were armed checkpoints.[126]

It has been noted that previously, handling the militias had been difficult as the government had been forced to rely on some of them for protection and security.[125][7] However, according to a Libyan interviewed in Tripoli, the government gained the ability to push back against the militias because of a "mandate of the people."[7]

On the 24th, the government commenced with a raid on a former military base held by a rogue infantry militia.[127]

Across the country, militias began surrendering to the government. The government formed a "National Mobile Force" for the purpose of evicting illegal militias.[128] On the same day as the declaration, various militias in Misrata held meetings, ultimately deciding to submit to the government's authority, and handed over various public facilities they had been holding, including the city's three main jails, which were handed over to the authority of the Ministry of Justice.[7] Hours before the announcement, in Derna, the two main militias (one of them Ansar-al-Sharia) active in the city both withdrew, leaving both their five military bases behind.[125][7][128]

Hundreds of Libyans, mainly former rebel fighters, gathered in the city centers of Tripoli and Benghazi to hand over their weapons to the government on the 29th of September.[129]

However, the campaign has been less successful in other areas, such as the remote Nafusa Mountains, inhabited by the Nafusi-speaking Berber minority, where the Emirati news agency The National reported on 23 September that arms were being hoarded. The National also reported arms being hoarded in Misrata, despite simultaneous reporting by other outlets that militias were surrendering in Misrata.[130]

President Barack Obama, with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, delivering a statement at the White House on September 12, 2012 in which he condemned the attack on the U.S. consulate.[131]

On September 12 U.S. PresidentBarack Obama condemned "this outrageous attack" on U.S. diplomatic facilities[132] and stated that "[s]ince our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others."[132] After referring to "the 9/11 attacks," "troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan", and "then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi"[132] the President then stated that "[a]s Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it."[132] He then went on to say, "[n]o acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."[132]

After the attack, Obama ordered that security be increased at all such facilities worldwide.[8] A 50-member MarineFAST team was sent to Libya to "bolster security."[133] It was announced that the FBI would investigate the possibility of the attack being planned.[134] U.S. officials said surveillance over Libya would increase, including the use of unmanned drones, to "hunt for the attackers."[134]

Secretary of State Clinton also made a statement on September 12, describing the perpetrators as "heavily armed militants" and "a small and savage group – not the people or government of Libya."[135] She also reaffirmed "America’s commitment to religious tolerance" and said "Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior, along with the protest that took place at our Embassy in Cairo yesterday, as a response to inflammatory material posted on the internet," but whether true or not, that was not a justification for violence.[136] The State Department had previously identified embassy and personnel security as a major challenge in its budget and priorities report.[137]

In a speech on September 13 in Golden, Colorado, President Obama paid tribute to the four Americans "killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Libya," stating, "We enjoy our security and our liberty because of the sacrifices they make...I want people around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished. It will not dim the light of the values that we proudly present to the rest of the world."[140]

In his press briefing on September 14, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters that "we don't have and did not have concrete evidence to suggest that this [the Benghazi attack] was not in reaction to the film."[141] He went on to say: "There was no intelligence that in any way could have been acted on to prevent these attacks. It is – I mean, I think the DNI spokesman was very declarative about this that the report is false. The report suggested that there was intelligence that was available prior to this that led us to believe that this facility would be attacked, and that is false." We have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack. The unrest we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive. And while the violence is reprehensible and unjustified, it is not a reaction to the 9/11 anniversary that we know of, or to U.S. policy."

On September 14 the remains of the slain Americans were returned to the U.S. President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton attended the ceremony. In her remarks Clinton said, "One young woman, her head covered and her eyes haunted with sadness, held up a handwritten sign that said 'Thugs and killers don’t represent Benghazi nor Islam.' The President of the Palestinian Authority, who worked closely with Chris when he served in Jerusalem, sent me a letter remembering his energy and integrity, and deploring – and I quote – 'an act of ugly terror.'[142] She went on to say: "We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with."

On the same day, federal probation officers met with the writer and producer of the controversial anti-Islam film "Innocence of Muslims", Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, to determine whether his involvement in the film violated the terms of his probation, which barred him from both accessing the internet without approval and using any names other than his legal name.[143] The probation stemmed from a 2010 conviction of bank fraud.

A report prepared by the CIA on Sept. 15, stated “The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.” [144] This initial assessment was provided to Executive Branch officials.[145]

On September 16 the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice appeared on five major interview shows to discuss the attacks. Prior to her appearance, Rice was provided with "talking points" from a CIA memo, which stated:

The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the US diplomatic post in Benghazi and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations. This assessment may change as additional information is collected and analyzed and as currently available information continues to be evaluated. The investigation is on-going, and the US Government is working with Libyan authorities to bring to justice those responsible for the deaths of US citizens.[9][146]

"Based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy—sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that-- in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent." "We do not-- we do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.""I think it's clear that there were extremist elements that joined in and escalated the violence. Whether they were al Qaeda affiliates, whether they were Libyan-based extremists or al Qaeda itself I think is one of the things we'll have to determine."[148][149][150][151][152]

In a White House press briefing on September 18, press secretary Jay Carney explained the attack to reporters: "I’m saying that based on information that we – our initial information, and that includes all information – we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a preplanned or premeditated attack; that we saw evidence that it was sparked by the reaction to this video. And that is what we know thus far based on the evidence, concrete evidence."[10]

On September 20, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney answered a question about an open hearing with the National Counterterrorism Center Director, Matthew G. Olsen, which referenced which extremist groups might have been involved. Carney said, "It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Our embassy was attacked violently, and the result was four deaths of American officials. So, again, that’s self-evident."[153] On the same day, during an appearance on Univision, a Spanish-language television network in the United States, President Obama stated, "What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests."[154][155][156][157][158]

On September 25, in an address before the United Nations General Assembly President Obama stated, "The attacks on our civilians in Benghazi were attacks on America...And there should be no doubt that we will be relentless in tracking down the killers and bringing them to justice."[45][159] He referred to "Innocence of Muslims" as "a crude and disgusting video [that] sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world." He said, "I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity." He further stated, "There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy."

On September 27, the filmmaker Nakoula Basseley Nakoula was arrested and ordered detained without bail due to probation violations.[160]

On September 28, U.S. intelligence stated "In the immediate aftermath, there was information that led us to assess that the attack began spontaneously following protests earlier that day at our embassy in Cairo. We provided that initial assessment to Executive Branch officials and members of Congress . . . . As we learned more about the attack, we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists. It remains unclear if any group or person exercised overall command and control of the attack, and if extremist group leaders directed their members to participate."[145]

To assist the Libyan government in disbanding extremist groups, the Obama administration allocated $8 million to begin building an elite Libyan commando force over the next year.[161]

Republican Party members accused the Obama White House and State Department of over-emphasizing the role of Islamic anger over the anti-Islamic movie Innocence of Muslims and alleged that the administration was reluctant to label the attack as "terrorist".[13] Representative Mike Rogers (R-MI), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who on the 13th of September said that the attacks had all the hallmarks of a coordinated attack by al-Qaeda,[162] has questioned whether there were any protests at all in Benghazi, saying: "I have seen no information that shows that there was a protest going on as you have seen around any other embassy at the time. It was clearly designed to be an attack."[163] According to critics, the consulate site should have been secured better both before and after the attack.

On the 20th, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a classified briefing to U.S. Senators,[164] which several Republican attendees criticized.[14] According to the article, senators were angered at the Obama administration's rebuff of their attempts to learn details of the Benghazi attack, only to see that information published the next day in The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.

GOP legislators also took issue with delays in the investigation, which CNN attributed to "bureaucratic infighting" between the FBI, Justice, and State. On the 26th, Senator Johnny Isakson (R-Georgia) said he "cannot believe that the FBI is not on the ground yet."[13]

On CNN'sState of the Union with Candy Crowley on September 30, Crowley observed that "Friday we got the administration's sort of definitive statement that this now looks as though it was a pre-planned attack by a terrorist group, some of whom were at least sympathetic to al Qaeda," and asked the senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator John McCain, "why do you think and are you bothered that it has taken them this long from September 11th to now to get to this conclusion?" to which McCain replied that "it interferes with the depiction that the administration is trying to convey that al Qaeda is on the wane... how else could you trot out our U.N. ambassador to say this was a spontaneous demonstration?... It was either willful ignorance or abysmal intelligence to think that people come to spontaneous demonstrations with heavy weapons, mortars, and the attack goes on for hours."[165]

On CBS'sFace the Nation on October 28, Senator John McCain (R-AZ) said "we know that there were tapes, recordings inside the consulate during this fight.... So the president went on various shows, despite what he said he said in the Rose Garden, about terrorist acts, he went on several programs, including The View including Letterman, including before the UN where he continued to refer, days later, many days later, to this as a spontaneous demonstration because of a hateful video. We know that is patently false. What did the president know? When did he know it? And what did he do about it?"[166] However, CBS News reported earlier on October 24 that the video of the assault was recovered 20 days after the attack, from the more than 10 security cameras at the compound.[167]

A study released on November 2 found that leading newspapers in the U.S. framed the attack in terms of a spontaneous protest (the Obama administration’s version) four times as often as a planned terrorist attack (the Republican version).[168] The study was based on a computer-assisted analysis of 2,572 words and phrases related to the attack in 348 news stories from September 12 to October 12 in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, and USA Today. On the day of that study's release, two of the newspapers—The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal—published editorials critical of the Obama administration's handling of Benghazi. The Washington Post editorial asked such questions as, "Did the Obama administration’s political preoccupation with maintaining a light footprint in Libya lead to an ill-considered reliance on local militias, rather than on U.S. forces?"[169]The Wall Street Journal editorial asked such questions as "Why did the U.S. not heed warnings about a growing Islamist presence in Benghazi and better protect the diplomatic mission and CIA annex?" and "Why has the Administration's story about what took place in Benghazi been so haphazard and unclear?"[170]

On November 4, two days before the presidential election, CBS News released a portion of its interview with President Obama for 60 Minutes that was filmed on September 12 but did not air originally on its September 23 show.[171] Journalist Bret Baier, host of Special Report with Bret Baier, noted that in these newly released portions of the interview "Obama would not say whether he thought the attack was terrorism. Yet he would later emphasize at a presidential debate that in the Rose Garden the same day, he had declared the attack an act of terror."[172] Baier noted that President Obama had been saying that he declared the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack since his announcement in the Rose Garden on September 12 and highlighted the newly released video interview with Steve Kroft: "KROFT: Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word terrorism in connection with the Libya Attack, do you believe that this was a terrorism attack? OBAMA: Well it’s too early to tell exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans. And we are going to be working with the Libyan government to make sure that we bring these folks to justice, one way or the other."[172]

Some have argued that the mainstream media have ignored or played down the significance of the Benghazi story; and some have also pointed to an alleged liberal bias, claiming that, if a Republican were president, there would have been much more critical and aggressive reporting.[173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][15]

On the last weekend of October a message posted on Facebook by a Political Action Committee (SOS PAC) claiming President Obama denied them backup in Benghazi was taken down twice by the social networking site. After the post was removed and SOS’s Facebook account suspended for 24 hours, the post was reinstated and SOS received an email from Facebook apologizing for the matter.[182]

Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer argued on Fox News' channel's Special Report with Bret Baier on October 24, “This is really a journalistic scandal. I mean, the fact there was not a word about any of this in the [New York] Times or the [Washington] Post today.” Krauthammer was referring to recently released emails that proved that the White House, contrary to its assertions, knew of terrorist connections to the attack almost immediately.[183]

The National Review argued that, on October 28 (less than 2 weeks before the presidential election), of the five Sunday news shows, only Fox News treated it as a major story. It argued that on the other four news shows, the issue came up only when Republicans mentioned it.[184] On NBC's Meet the Press, host David Gregory changed the subject when a guest tried to bring up the subject of the Benghazi attack, saying, "Let's get to Libya a little bit later." Gregory never did get back to Benghazi.[184][185]

A November 2, 2012 article in The Huffington Post detailed how The Associated Press, The New York Times, and The Washington Post held back information about the attack at the request of the CIA and the Obama administration.[186] The media organizations held back information at the government's request that the two former SEALs killed in the attack (Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty) were working for the CIA.

On November 26, 2012, journalist Tom Ricks went on Fox News' Happening Now with Jon Scott to discuss the attack. While being interviewed on Fox News by Jon Scott, Ricks accused Fox News of being "extremely political" in its coverage of the attack and said that "Fox was operating as a wing of the Republican Party." Ricks accused the network of covering the story more than it needed to be. The interview was cut short and Ricks and the interview was not mentioned or covered by Fox News again. Fox News was subsequently criticized for cutting the interview short.[187][188] Jon Scott was also criticized for making no mention of the interview on Fox News Watch, a media analysis program he hosts.[189][190] In an interview with the Associated Press, Fox News' White House correspondent Ed Henry suggested that he thought Benghazi was being covered too much by the network. Henry said, “We’ve had the proper emphasis, but I would not be so deluded to say that some of our shows, some of our commentators, have covered it more than it needed to be covered.”[191][192]

The investigation report was seen as a sharp criticism of State Department officials in Washington for ignoring requests for more guards and safety upgrades, and for failing to adapt security procedures to a deteriorating security environment. "Systemic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels within two bureaus of the State Department ... resulted in a special mission security posture that was inadequate for Benghazi and grossly inadequate to deal with the attack that took place," said the unclassified version of the report.[194] It also blamed too much reliance on local militias who failed to fend off the attackers that evening.[195] The Council on Foreign Relations in an initial report saw it as a refutation to the notion that the Obama administration delayed its response.[196] However, it confirmed that contrary to initial accounts, there was no protest outside the consulate. It placed responsibility for the incident solely upon the attackers, deemed as terrorists.[12]

^{cite news |title=Lessons of the Battle of Benghazi |author=Clifford D. May |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/332961/lessons-battle-benghazi-clifford-d-may# |newspaper=National Review Online |date=8 November 2012 |accessdate=11 November 2012 |quote=Now that the election is behind us, perhaps we can put politics aside and acknowledge a hard fact: On September 11, 2012, America was defeated by al-Qaeda in the Battle of Benghazi. }}