I guess I'm just a "Slow Loser"

I may not be "The Biggest Loser," but at least I'm a "slow loser." By
depriving myself of only a few hundred calories a day, I have enjoyed
a very slow but very steady decline in my body weight since mid-March.

When I covered this topic in my
May 16 column, after getting down to
167 pounds, I speculated that I might not even stop losing when I
reached my formerly unimaginable weight of 164. (That's where the
Body Mass Index
charts say a 5'8" person would no longer be
overweight.)

Well, guess what? I in fact did not stop!

I am finding this
"Hacker's Diet" so easy to do, that I sailed right
past 164, and even on to 160. I needed a new goal, so lately I've
been targeting the "Mike Arneson" milestone. Mike is an engineer I've
worked with for 22 years. He's the same height as I am, but remarkably,
has maintained a rock-solid consistent weight of 155 pounds.

As my steady progress continued, I thought, why not be like Mike?
Well, last Thursday I hit pay dirt -- 155 pounds! Of course, my
20-day exponentially-smoothed rolling-average (20DESRA) is still
156.4, so I can't truly celebrate until that curve crosses 155. But I
can predict quite accurately when that will occur, thanks to the free
web application provided by the Hacker's Diet.

I don't want to repeat too much from my
May column, but in a nutshell,
the
Hacker's Diet, written by Autocad software author
John Walker,
is a free online book that has inspired me to action. The main point
is that when trying to lose weight, the only thing that matters is
calories in vs. calories out. And by tracking your weight with that
special graph, you can see what's really happening, allowing you to
ignore the daily fluctuations.

Despite the name, it is NOT a normal kind of diet. I continue to eat
any food I want, any time I want. The only catch is that I try to
consume 500 fewer calories than I burn each day.

I have found this process to be not only relatively painless,
but actually kind of fun. I use another free app and web page,
MyFitnessPal.com (MFP), to track my food and exercise each day. It's
like playing a video game, with the prize being your health!

It's hard to argue with the numbers:

Starting Weight (20DESRA)

Weight Loss (lbs/week)

March

176.4

0.90

April

174.5

1.01

May

169.9

1.02

June

165.9

0.63

July

163.4

0.66

Aug.

161.5

0.82

Sept.

158.4

0.57

The graph for the first three months was almost spot-on with the
prediction of a loss of one pound per week. The curve tapered off
a bit in the summer months, but so what? It's still going the right
direction.

I've learned a few important points. First, what happens if I were
to stop keeping track?

That's exactly what I did when we went on an eight-day canoe trip in
the BWCA. I didn't record anything during that time, and ate whatever
food that was in front of me. The result? My weight was flat for that
period. No loss -- but then, no gain either.

It didn't bother me that the graph flat-lined for a week, since I
have no particular time goal here. And this agreed with Walker's
experience, that it is no harder for him to maintain his weight at
145 than it was at 215 pounds.

The second thing I've learned is that you can go wild for one day.
A trip to the
Minnesota State Fair is incomplete without covering
the basic food groups: deep fried cheese curds, Dairy Building malts,
Pronto Pups, butter-soaked corn on the cob, and of course
Tom Thumb Donuts.
At the end of that glorious day, MFP showed a whopping 1500
calorie surplus, above and beyond those burned off by eight miles
of walking.

But even that was not as big a deal as it might seem. First, my daily
budget is already set for 500 calories less than break-even. So I
actually took in only 1000 extra calories for the day. Since every
3500 calories correlates to one pound, I really gained only 1/3 of
a pound that day.

In other words, you can PIG OUT for a whole day, and gain only FIVE
OUNCES! Of course, that would add up quickly if every day were like
that. But once in a while? No problem! Weight control is more about
daily routines over the long term.

I'm finding this so easy and interesting, I'm not quite sure when
to stop! If I could pick any weight, what should it be? I honestly
don't know.

Maybe I should try for a BMI of 21.7, which is midway in the "normal"
range of 18.5-24.9. That would put me at 143 pounds. Seems like a
stretch goal, but then so did 155 in June...and 164 in April...and
even 178 a year ago.

One thing I do know: Despite how much fun it is to control my
weight through eating, at SOME point it will have to level off -- you
can't be a loser forever. In the meantime, I think I still have room
to grow -- er, shrink.