Post navigation

Today’s blog post is a “special edition” of “Mondays with Mary” regarding the great Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception, which is a Holy Day of Obligation for Catholics. This means we are required to attend Mass. In reality, we should want to run to Mass…all the time!

This post is much different. Acts of the Apostasy has inspired me to write this post with such creativity. I have used St. Thomas Aquinas’ pedagogy from the Summa Theologica to teach and explain the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception. The information was researched from Mark Miravalle’s, Introduction to Mary and my notes from the class – Mary in the Modern World. Hope you enjoy!

How to read St. Thomas Aquinas? – 1. Read the Question, 2. Read each “objection” and the “reply to the objection”, 3. Read – “I answer that”, and 4. Read, “on the contrary.”

Article: What is the Dogmatic Teaching of the Immaculate Conception?

Objection 1.St. Bernard of Clairvaux did not believe in the Immaculate Conception because he thought the conception of Mary violates the means of how original sin is transmitted. He thought that the infected bodies of the parents transmit to the soul of a child. Other theologians also believed that if Mary were immaculately conceived, why would she be in need to be redeemed by Jesus Christ.

Objection 2. If one asks a non-Catholic on the street or a poorly catechized Catholic, most think that the Immaculate Conception is the conception of Jesus Christ not the conception of Mary.

Objection 3. There is no mention in the Holy Scriptures of the Immaculate Conception – so where do Catholics come up with this dogma as being Scriptural?

Objection 4. The Immaculate Conception gets its name from the Immaculate Reception.

On the contrary, even though the seeds of the Immaculate Conception are found in the Scriptures, as shown in reply to Objection 3 below, the Early Church (Patristic) Fathers helped explain, and believed that Mary was conceived immaculately. The Immaculate Conception organically grew in the Tradition of the Church.

St. Ambrose (d. 397) refers to the Blessed Virgin as “free from all sin.” (Exposito in Psalm 118, Sermon 22).

St. Severus, Bishop of Antioch (d. 538) states: “She [Mary]…formed part of the human race, and was of the same essence as we, although she was pure from all taint and immaculate.” (Hom., cathedralis, 67)

St. Andrew of Crete (d. 740) tells us that the Redeemer chose “in all nature this pure and entirely Immaculate Virgin.” (Hom. 1 in Nativ. Deiparae)

I answer that; Blessed Pope Pius IX declared the Immaculate Conception solemn with an infallible statement (ex cathedra – from the chair) on December 8, 1854. The precise definition states: “We declare, pronounce, and define, the doctrine which holds that the Most Blessed Virgin Mary by her conception, was preserved immune from all stain of sin, by a singular grace and privilege of the Omnipotent God, in view of the merits of Jesus Christ, the Savior of the human race, was revealed by God and must be firmly and constantly believed by all the faithful.” From the moment of her Conception, Mary is preserved from original sin and all its effects. Mary is not redeemed. To be redeemed is to be bought from the slavery and bondage of Satan/sin. She is not under the bondage of sin and is not bought back. Mary does not get “muddy” and is not affected by sin. She does NOT commit mortal or venial sin and does NOT have concupiscence (the inclination to sin).

Reply to Objection 1.Blessed John Duns Scotus answered St. Bernard of Clairvaux and other theologians by explaining that original sin does not transmit from the infected parents to the soul of a child. He said that original sin was present on the soul of the child at conception because of the lack of sanctifying grace. While Blessed Scotus did refute these theologians, the final theological explanation on the Immaculate Conception would come from the Magisterium guided by the Holy Spirit.

Reply to Objection 2. The Immaculate Conception is not the conception of Jesus Christ but the conception of Mary in the womb of her mother, St. Anne (married to St. Joachim). The Annunciation (celebrated on March 25) is the conception of Jesus Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit. This is why we celebrate Christmas on December 25 – 9 months after the conception at the Annunciation (announcement). Biblical historians and scholars believe that Jesus was actually born in March or April. The Church placed Christmas in December to rival the pagans who worshipped the Sun god during the Winter Solstice.

Reply to Objection 3. Genesis 3:15 is the primary Scripture verse for the Immaculate Conception. God is addressing the serpent. He says that there will be enmity (total and complete opposition) between you and woman, your seed and her seed. He/She (Jesus/Mary) will crush your head and you shall lie in wait for her (Mary) heal. The serpent (not a snake, but a dragon) is Satan. The seed of the serpent is sin, all evil humans, and all evil angels. The seed of the woman (Eve at first, but its Mary. A prophetic text – see below) is Jesus Christ, who conquers all sin. The woman in Genesis 3:15 is different from the woman in Genesis 3:16. The woman in Genesis 3:16 is Eve – she is not victorious; she suffers with sin, and is dominated by her husband. Genesis 3:15 is known as the Protoevangelium – First Gospel.

The second Scripture verse comes from the New Testament in Luke 1:28 – The Annunciation. The angel Gabriel speaks the words, “Hail, Full of Grace.” The Greek term is “kecharitomene” which translates to “having-been-graced one” or something to that effect, it’s a perfect participle. It is stating the action was completed in the past but with a relevance to the present. Such as – you who have been perfected in Grace or you who have been transformed in Grace. It is an action completed in the past but relevant to the present. The angel is using the term – “kecharitomene” as a name for Mary and the event that has happened to Mary in the past (her Immaculate Conception). The angel is calling her a new name that fulfills her mission. Blessed John Paul II said, she is full of Grace called upon to the mission of redemption. Where Eve brought death, Mary, the New Eve, brings life.

Reply to Objection 4. No – the Immaculate Conception occurred over 2000 years ago and has nothing to do with the National Football League. The Immaculate Reception is one of the most famous and controversial plays of all time in American football. It happened in an American Football Conference divisional playoff game on December 23, 1972 between the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Oakland Raiders at Three Rivers Stadium in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. You can read about the play here and watch it here.

**This post is dedicated to my friends at My Mother Mary on Facebook. If you have Facebook, follow them. I know them personally. Great people and faithful Catholics!**

The Immaculate Conception of our Blessed Virgin Mary is a great prodigy of God because in the beginning and from all Eternity (ab aeterno) She is first conceived in the Incarnate Word and then She conceived the Son of God to assume a human nature ; therefore it is befitting to first she be conceived Immaculate, Pure, Holy and full of grace as the dwelling place of the Son of God Incarnate. It is by the power of God in His Divine Will forming, molding, embellishing Her with all the divine attributes, divine virtues , divine love because she lives in the very Life of God in His Son Jesus and all Her acts operates only in the Divine Will of God. She is the First Redeemed in virtue of the Merits of His Son Jesus, as first conceived in the Humanity of Jesus: as His breath, blood, body, divinity in The very Heart of Jesus as Her Immaculate Heart being fortified in divine manner freeing Her from any stain of Original Sin. Thus, she is conceived in the Divine Fiat as pronounced Itself with such creative power and commmunicative power of God.

I believe this is a misprint. In the paragraph the recites what Pope Pius IX declares Our Lady the Immaculate Conception, there is an error. At the end of the Pope declaration, this is the last few sentences ” To be redeemed is to be bought from the slavery and bondage of Satan/sin. She is not under the bondage of sin and is not bought back. Mary does not get “muddy” and is not affected by sin. She does commit mortal or venial sin and does have concupiscence (the inclination to sin). Don’t you mean. “she does not commit mortal sins or venial sin and does not have concupiscence” ? You need to fix this please. As is reads it may be considered blasphemy. Thank you and God Bless!

Yes, Mary! Thank you so much! That is a misprint and you are the first to catch it. I have edited that sentence now. Again, thank you for catching that for me. I wrote this late last night and must have just not seen it. Thanks!