Age and the decline in crime

(Phys.org) —Probation officers see firsthand the effect age has on crime. Typically, an offender will commit fewer crimes as he or she ages.

"Essentially, crime peaks around age 17, 18," said Gary Sweeten, an associate professor at the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Arizona State University. "There is a rapid increase in the teenage years up to that point and then, almost as rapid of a decline after that point and continued declines throughout the life course."

The question is why?

Developmental criminological theories identify numerous life changes associated with getting older that are tied with reductions in crime: stable employment, good marriages, having kids and temperamental changes, for example. However, one prominent criminological viewpoint holds that the relationship between age and crime is inexplicable. It cannot be explained by life changes associated with aging. This "inexplicability" hypothesis, which has gone largely unchallenged for 30 years, interested Sweeten.

"They (researchers) suggested that age affects crime directly," Sweeten said, "and we do not have any sociological or psychological explanation available to use to account for that effect."

Along with Alex Piquero of the University of Texas at Dallas and Laurence Steinberg at Temple University, Sweeten examined data from a longitudinal study called Pathways to Desistance, which followed 1,300 serious juvenile offenders in Phoenix and Philadelphia over a seven-year period. Their article, "Age and the Explanation of Crime, Revisited," will be published in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence and is currently available online.

"The unique aspect of this dataset that really sparked our interest in using it for this study was the breadth of information that was measured at each wave," said Sweeten. "So we were able to control for 40 different things that were changing over these seven years."

Among the changes they measured were the effect of social control, such as employment and marriage; procedural justice, such as perceptions of the legitimacy and fairness of the legal system; learning, such as gang membership and exposure to antisocial peers; strain, such as victimization and relationship breakup; psychosocial maturity, such as impulse control, self-regulation and moral disengagement; and rational choice, such as costs and rewards of crime.

"We looked at all these simultaneously," said Sweeten. "And what we were trying to see is – starting from the age crime curve that we see in these data – what would happen if you took all those variables and held them constant? How much of a decline in crime would you see? And that would be the direct effect of age on crime. The goal was to eliminate that effect, to fully explain the effect of age on crime."

Sweeten said he and his colleagues were able to explain more than two-thirds of the drop in crime between the ages of 15 to 25 using the 40 variables, but couldn't account for the remaining 30 percent.

"We found significant explanations for changes in crime from all the theories we tested – every one of them," noted Sweeten.

The strongest explanation involved social learning theory, accounting for 49 percent of the drop in crime from age 15 to 25. Factors that contributed included exposure to antisocial peers, antisocial peer pressure and gangs. The next strongest explanation for the crime drop came from strain theory. Such variables as mobility, homelessness, victimization and witnessing victimization contributed to a 40-percent decline in crime. Psychosocial variables accounted for a 24-percent drop in crime and social control theory a 26-percent decline. The latter involved such factors as whether an offender was in a relationship, had children, attended school, or was on probation. A total of 16 of the 40 measured variables proved statistically significant.

"It's a complicated story," Sweeten said. "We don't point to one single thing that causes crime, so there's no silver bullet. Lots of things are changing, so the approach to trying to reduce crime should be multifaceted. It should focus on delinquent peer association, psychosocial bonds, strain, psychosocial functioning – all these different things all at the same time."

Sweeten suspected he and his colleagues might be able to fully explain the age effect of the drop in crime, particularly with the breadth of variables they were looking at.

"I thought there was a good change we could knock out the age effect," Sweeten said. "So, that kind of surprised me, actually. That there is still a direct effect of age despite all the things we controlled for. So to me, it's a call for more research, it's a call to better understand what's going on."

The challenge, acknowledges Sweeten, is finding a dataset such as the one used that measures many variables over time.

Related Stories

Contrary to convention, vegetation, when well-maintained, can lower the rates of certain types of crime, such as aggravated assault, robbery and burglary, in cities, according to a Temple University study, "Does vegetation ...

New York City experienced a historic decline in crime rates during the 1990s, but it was not due to the implementation of CompStat or enhanced enforcement of misdemeanor offenses, according to an analysis by New York University ...

Modern crime prevention would benefit from a greater biosocial approach to delinquency and offending that is rooted in family, school and community intervention strategies, according to a research team led by University of ...

Recommended for you

A team of researchers from Korea, the U.K. and Denmark has found fossilized brains of sea creatures that lived during the Cambrian explosion. In their paper published in the journal Nature Communications, the group describes ...

For centuries, scientists and scholars have measured the influence of individuals and discoveries through citations, a crude statistic subject to biases, politics and other distortions. A new paper led by the Knowledge Lab ...

Anthropologists at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History and an international team of collaborators have discovered that early humans in East Africa had—by about 320,000 years ago—begun trading with distant ...

Modern humans co-existed and interbred not only with Neanderthals, but also with another species of archaic humans, the mysterious Denisovans. While developing a new genome-analysis method for comparing whole genomes between ...

An international team of researchers, led by Johannes Krause and Choongwon Jeong from the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History (Jena, Germany), and Abdeljalil Bouzouggar from the Institut National des Sciences ...