Welcome! This is the Ohio Jobs and Justice PAC (OJJPAC) website. OJJPAC is a non-partisan educational civil rights and advocacy
organization focusing on important public policy issues that affect Ohio and
the nation. It is a resource used by public officials,
journalists, academics, and citizen activists since 2005.

OJJPAC's educational and advocacy initiatives will focus on
the effects of illegal immigration on the civil rights of American citizens, the
economy, U.S. sovereignty, and post 9-11 national security. This website
does not avoid controversy. Its purpose is to inform, question, arouse
thought and action, and challenge common misconceptions. It is
dedicated to conflict resolution, violence prevention, and advancing U.S. social
and civil cohesiveness.

Scroll down for news, commentary, photos, links, and job postings. Please email me
(salvi@ojjpac.org), if
you find an error or want to comment. Legal disclaimers, notices, and
the site's privacy policy are at the bottom of this page. Now let the truth set you free! Peace.

We don't mean to put words into U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown's
mouth...but Senator Brown should have as much compassion for
American citizens as he has for illegal aliens.

Millions of American families are devastated by
the criminal acts of illegal aliens. Crimes such as identity theft, job
theft--leaving Ohio workers unemployed, drug trafficking, and murder, are all too common.

Has Senator Brown sponsored even one bill to
crackdown on illegal immigration during his many years in office? No. In fact, Senator Brown
has voted against legislation to stop illegal immigration. He has instead
supported granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.

Yes, justice should be tempered with compassion.
But when compassion is one-sided and American victims are left to fend for
themselves, it's just wrong!

Senator Brown's consistent support for illegal alien amnesties and failure to
support immigration law enforcement may soon end his political career in the
U.S. Senate.

President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions have begun to reverse
some of Obama's damaging
immigration policies. But many remain substantially unchanged.
For example:

1. Enforcement
continues to be too limited in scope.

2. Obama's PEP program is still in
operation, limiting enforcement to only a small population of
illegal aliens.

3. According to Judicial Watch,
unaccompanied minors from Latin and Central America continue to
illegally enter the US and the US DHS is transporting these
illegal aliens (some of whom likely work for the drug cartels) at
taxpayer expense on commercial flights to their city of choice all over
the U.S.

4. The number of U.S. cities providing some level of sanctuary for illegal aliens
is over 500 and the Sanctuary Cities List continues to grow.

5. After a temporary reduction in
illegal migrant crossings, the flow of new illegal alien arrivals has
returned to the levels that occurred during the Obama Administration.

6. Mexico continues to allow Mexican
and other foreign migrants from Central America (and elsewhere) to
illegally enter the U.S. via the US/Mexican border.

President Trump's vacillation between Enforcement & Amnesty talk

President Trump's past comments in favor of "comprehensive immigration reform"
(a.k.a. amnesty) are very troubling since the devastating consequences
of the 1986 illegal alien amnesty continue to haunt our nation today.
The 1986 Amnesty was to be the final amnesty and was promised to
bring an end to illegal migration. It did the exact opposite--it instead encouraged
millions more illegal aliens to enter the U.S. Since 1986, many
more amnesty bills were introduced into the U.S. Congress to benefit the
millions of new illegal aliens-- waiting for the next
amnesty.

The Trump 70 point immigration enforcement wish list that was released
in 2017 has all but been forgotten. The first quarter of 2018 was
spent attempting to pass a DREAMER amnesty.

President Trump promised
victims' families and the nation that he would rescind DACA on day one of his election.
He did not keep his promise. The unconstitutional
program established by the Obama administration continued until a
September 5, 2017 threatened lawsuit by state attorney generals
forced the administration to partially rescind the program with a
proposed 6 month complete termination schedule.

Under Trump's modified DACA program, illegal alien recipients (which reportedly number over 800,000), got to keep their temporary
protective status, including work privileges and social security numbers
for at least 2 years. Rather than being subject to deportation, illegal aliens in the DACA program continue to remain in the US, and
some of which
commit serious crimes.

A recent report estimated that the
total number of eligible illegal aliens for a Trump DREAMer
Amnesty is over 3 million. If those 3+ million
illegal aliens receive permanent residency status or U.S. citizenship,
they would then be able to submit visa petitions with USCIS on
behalf of certain relatives, some of which would have an immediate right
to apply for permanent legal resident status (PLR).. This is how
any DREAMer amnesty would result in additional chain migration to the
U.S. of millions of additional aliens. A majority of these aliens
would likely be dependant on taxpayer funded social services for the
remainder of their lives in the U.S.

If DACA was unconstitutional under Obama, it is equally unconstitutional
under Trump. DACA was never completely rescinded and as the Trump
administration deadline passed, DACA continues in operation as lawsuits
the federal court system decide if its "alleged" termination by the
Trump administration was legal or not.

As time has passed, the President is
now (April, 2018) stating that he is no longer going to try to negotiate
a DREAMer amnesty deal with Democrats since they refused to accept any
enforcement components as part of the DREAMer legislation. Let's
see if this positive development continues.

The President is also apparently irritated by Mexico's failure to
prevent illegal aliens from using its border to enter the US. The
President most recently said that he plans to request National Guard
troops be activated for duty on the U.S. and Mexico border--but they
will not be enforcing U.S. immigration law according to the Secretary of
Homeland Security.

In addition to beefing up U.S. border and interior immigration
enforcement, the US State Department needs to use its influence and leverage to move
Mexico and other foreign governments to
stem the flow of migrants and improve the quality of life for their citizens.
If they don't, the U.S. may have no choice but to use more drastic
measures to get compliance.

The US Congress

Congress' does not have to include any enforcement provisions
along with an amnesty.
President Trump has limited influence on what the Congress actually passes,
other than a veto threat.
The Senate especially is unlikely (and unfortunately) to pass a bill that
includes the provisions in the Goodlatte bill that include ending chain
migration, visa lottery, mandatory E-Verify, and money for border
security enhancement. These provisions would certainly help attack
the US immigration problem but a key drawback is the legalization
(amnesty) for potentially a few million illegal alien so-called DREAMers.
Legalizing millions of DREAMERS also potentially creates a million
anti-immigration law enforcement activists who will be emboldened by
their new legal status to become increasingly politically active and
determined to defeat pro-enforcement candidates and current public
officials.

Although the Goodlatte bill has a fair chance to pass in the House, I do
not believe it can survive the US Senate unless most of the enforcement
provisions are removed.

If not for cross-party animosity, the
bill most likely to pass would be a DREAMER amnesty. All Democrats would
vote in favor of an amnesty and a number of pro-amnesty Republicans would join them.
This is the most likely threat, especially since the Republican leadership
in the House is open to passing an amnesty. The Freedom Caucus and
mobilized citizen activists are the other primary deterrent to the
passage of a so-called "clean" DREAMer bill.

What you can do this week? Contact
the White House and your member of the US Congress and choose what to
say from the list below:

1. You oppose any further delay in ending Obama's Unconstitutional Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals (DACA) program. This is one of the
most important actions the president can take today to turn off the
illegal migration magnet.

2. You oppose any so-called DREAMER amnesty!

3. You oppose "comprehensive immigration reform," a/k/a/ general
Amnesty for all illegal aliens in the US.

4. You oppose the US DHS helping
unaccompanied minors into the US. You want them immediately
repatriated or returned over any border in which they entered the US.

5. You oppose chain migration
and the visa lottery.

6. You support enhanced and
aggressive interior and border enforcement, including funding for staff
and infrastructure.

7. You support President Trump's
executive orders, including the Order that requests funding cuts for
sanctuary cities.

9. You support Cong. Tom Cotton's Reforming American
Immigration for Strong Employment Act (RAISE) bill to end chain migration.
Ask your members of Congress to support 'attrition by enforcement' as a
method of reducing the number of illegal aliens in the U.S.

10. Call your city officials. Ask
your city officials to contact members of Congress and President Trump and
request immediate and aggressive enforcement of existing immigration laws.

11. Call your members of Congress
and ask the to support the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act.

12. Encourage President Trump to
close down one-half of the existing Mexican consulates in the U.S. These
consulates are not necessary and their primary function is to aid and abet
Mexican nationals illegally residing in our nation.

1. Call the White
House--say you oppose Kirstjen
Nielsen's pro-Amnesty policies and
expect President Trump to replace her with a pro-enforcement DHS
Secretary.

2. Spread the word
of this national security betrayal on social media.

OHIO:
CITIZEN ACTION ALERT! 5-23-18

Ohio's anti-sanctuary city bill....Call
your Ohio state legislator and ask them to co-sponsor Ohio House Bill 179,
sponsored by State Representative Candice Keller.

After a meeting with State Rep. Candice Keller at the Riffe State Office
Tower in Columbus, Ohio.

Illegal Aliens break up thousands of American
families every year...by killing them.

A vigil held for Grant Ronnebeck, 21, by family and
friends. Grant was murdered by an illegal alien who wanted to steal a pack
of cigarettes. Who is actually responsible for breaking up families?

Opposing terrorism and
islamic "civilization jihad" is
common sense...not an unreasonable fear (phobia).

Have you heard of VOICE?

VOICE is the new Victims of
Immigration Crime Engagement office. It was established by President Trump to
aide American families who have been victimized by illegal aliens. The
office will help keep victims' families get access to information about their
family member's case, including information about the alien defendant.

in their stories and downplaying the harm they cause to
American victims?

Immigration status is relevant
to crime.

Journalists, please
report and
not omit the legal status of aliens' illegally living or working in the U.S. in
violation of federal law.

Sixteen years after September 11th...
Thousands of
Americans Continue to be Killed and Injured by Illegal Aliens.
Yet Churches, Public Officials & "Social Justice" Groups Remain silent!

Will
Pres. Trump keep his promise to Victims?

It has
been 16 years since 9-11. Too many U.S. public officials continue to oppose
common sense measures to protect the U.S. border and conduct aggressive
interior immigration enforcement. Voters recently demonstrated their
frustration with the disastrous immigration policies of the Obama
administration and candidate Hillary Clinton's promise to continue down the same
destructive path.

Hillary Clinton openly supported a massive amnesty policy and other
open-border policies that would have
continued the erosion of U.S. sovereignty and encouraged an even greater
flow of illegal aliens, illegal narcotics, and terrorists into our
villages, cities, counties and states.

President Trump uniquely supported immigration law enforcement during his
campaign, although at times in vague terms. Mr. Trump clearly said
that illegal alien criminals will be deported if he was elected. That's good but what
about the other 10-15 million illegal aliens in the US who violated U.S.
immigration laws (and perhaps other criminal statutes but have not been
caught and prosecuted)?

After reading President
Trump's Executive Orders regarding border and interior enforcement, I was
cautiously optimistic that ALL illegal aliens will be subject to potential
detention and deportation. However the President recently has
flip-flopped on DACA and has encouraged Congress to pass an illegal alien
DREAMER Amnesty. The Trump administration has also continued President Obama's Priority Enforcement Program policy
which excludes most illegal aliens from likely enforcement action.
That being said, a positive is that federal immigration agents have
seemingly have been given more authority
to determine if an illegal alien should be placed into deportation proceedings.

It's a good bet is that President Trump will do much more to enforce US immigration laws
than Hillary Clinton. President Trump
is already facing massive opposition from progressive Democrats, establishment
Republicans, one-world government globalists, and numerous and well
funded open-border non-profits groups.

Let's encourage the
President to keep his campaign promises and drop any talk of amnesty and
expose the lies of the open-border lobby.

What can you do?

Call
the U.S. Capitol toll free:

1-866-220-0044 and say:

1. YES
to Immigration Law Enforcement and timely deportation of immigration law
violators.

2. YES
to the immediate repatriation of any foreign national that has
violated U.S. immigration laws. This is the "attrition by enforcement"
policy. (When illegal foreign
nationals understand that the US will enforce its immigration laws, unauthorized
aliens will leave on their own, "self-deport," rather than wait for inevitable
incarceration and deportation.)

House Speaker,
Paul Ryan, has a record of supporting Amnesty and likely will attempt to pass an
Amnesty at soon as he has the votes.

Please
continue to call Ryan's office AND more importantly, your members of Congress.
Demand that Congress put the heat on the Republican leadership to not only
shelve any plans to pass amnesty but also support President-elect Trump's
efforts to enforce U.S. immigration laws, including a crackdown on sanctuary
cities.

Actions you can
take now:

1) Go to the
local Congressional district office to oppose Amnesty (sample script below).

2) Ask if your Congressperson has scheduled any town-hall meetings in your area. If so, go to the meeting and ask your
representative to oppose Amnesty and demand that immigration laws be enforced.

3) Call your
Congressperson's Washington D.C. office--tell the staffer that you are a
district voter and support aggressive immigration law enforcement and oppose ANY form of Amnesty!

4) Write
letters to the editors for local, state, and national newspapers.

5) Call
talk-radio shows.

6) Make
yourself a pro-enforcement/no amnesty sign with poster board and markers.
Place it in your yard or hold it at a busy intersection in your town.

THE LARGEST ARCHIVE OF OHIO
SPECIFIC ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION LINKS IN THE
WORLD!

Sanctuary
Cities, USA list

Is your city selling-out America?

Is your city a sanctuary city? Take a look at this list of
U.S. sanctuary cities compiled by OJJPAC.org. Let's shorten the sanctuary city list by protesting until these resolutions,
ordinances and executive orders are repealed. To view the Sanctuary
Cities, USA list, click here: Sanctuary Cities, USA

Welcoming people to the 2016 Republican National Convention held in Cleveland,
Ohio.

When
someone says they support "comprehensive immigration
reform," what does that mean?

"Comprehensive
immigration reform" =AMNESTY

AMNESTY
= "Comprehensive immigration reform"

It
doesn't mean change...it means the same failed 1986 amnesty legislation that
became law and
made a bad problem worse--increasing illegal immigration from 3 to over 12
million (actually closer to 20 million +) and costing thousands of American
lives and trillions in tax dollars.

JUST
SAY NO TO TROJAN HORSE AMNESTY LEGISLATION!

Ohio Jobs &
Justice PAC participated
in July 15th D.C. March For Jobs sponsored by the Black
American Leadership Alliance. The
March took place in Washington, D.C., beginning at Freedom
Plaza and continued down Constitution Avenue to Upper Senate
Park, across the street from the U.S. Capitol.

According to The Hill, the U.S. House of Representatives Ethics Committee
found Richardson guilty of improperly pressuring
her official staff to campaign for her, destroying evidence and tampering with
witness testimony. Not surprising when you understand how leftists do business.

What's her punishment? A $10,000 fine. Big deal.

I wrote the below commentary
7 years ago...but it is still relevant today...with billions in
additional taxpayer expense since 2010!

Stealing from American Families

Costs of granting U.S. birthright
citizenship to children of illegal aliens:

Survey concludes that
320,000 children born in the U.S. had illegal alien parents in 2008

OJJPAC note: The cost to U.S. taxpayers just for
K-12 education for 320,000 U.S. born children is approximately $38.4
billion dollars!

The additional cost of
educating the millions of children brought illegally into the U.S. by
their parents takes away billions of dollars more from American families who are
already facing hard financial times. Is this situation unfair and
unjust? Yes--which is why the public demands enforcement of our
immigration laws.

Calculation process: Average cost per pupil
is roughly $10,000 per year multiplied by 12 years (K-12th grade) =
$120,000 x 320,000 students = $38.4 billion.

The Islamic Center of
Cleveland

The controversial Council on American Islamic
Relations' (CAIR) Ohio Chapter sponsored an interfaith Ramadan dinner July
28,2012 at the Islamic Center of Cleveland. The keynote speaker was Saeed A.
Kahn, a professor at Wayne State University. Kahn teaches several courses,
including Islamic and Middle History, Islamic civilizations, and History of
Islamic Political Thought according to the program.

Controversy over CAIR became public when it was listed as an
unindicted co-conspirator in a federal government case against a U.S. based
Islamic charity called The Holy Land Foundation of Relief & Development.
An appeals court later ruled that the government should not have made some of
the information about CAIR and others public.

A federal investigation alleged that the Holy Land Foundation
was raising money for Hamas, which had been designated as a terrorist
organization in 1995.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided
testimony that there was a relationship between the . founders of CAIR, CAIR,
and an organization called the Palestinian Committee. The Palestinian
Committee the FBI maintained, via seized documents, was connected to Hamas.

The Islamic Center of Cleveland is also no stranger to
controversy. It's former Imam, Imam Fawas Damra, a Palestinian immigrant,
was deported to the West Bank in 2007 after he was found guilty of concealing
his ties to terrorist groups when he filed his application to emigrate to the
U.S.

According to CAIR's Mission statement, CAIR's purpose is to
enhance understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties,
empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual
understanding.

U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown says
Ohio citizens that support the Tea Party are angry with the USA

The Tea Party is nothing more
than Ohio
voters--fathers, mothers, and grandparents that love the USA and don't want
socialist politicians like you to continue to support socialist policies
that are bankrupting our communities, state and nation.

OHIO'S U.S. SEN.
SHERROD BROWN TURNS BACK ON UNEMPLOYED AMERICANS WHEN IT COMES TO HIS ILLEGAL
ALIEN SUPPORTERS

While Senator
Sherrod Brown continues to support Amnesty and the spending of billions of your tax
dollars to fund illegal aliens in the United States...

Americans are losing their jobs and going hungry...

Click the "Welcome Dayton"
graphic below to learn the secret plan to become a
Sanctuary for Ilegal Aliens!

Is the global economy inducing global government?

Are Americans allowing the so-called
"global economy" to move US public policy towards the acceptance of a
global government and diminished (if not eliminated) US sovereignty?
Are we being conditioned to accept less self-determination and more
control of our lives by foreign interests inside and outside our borders?

After a decade of research, the answer appears to be yes--and that should
worry every American who takes the protections afforded by our
Constitution for granted. There is certainly the threat that
the youth of today will grow old in a vastly changed nation if we remain
on the same policy pathway.

Hazleton, PA-- A drive into Hazleton treats the town
visitor to spectacular views of Pennsylvania's mountain landscapes.
Unfortunately, the streets of Hazleton are less tranquil according to
long-time residents dismayed by increasing crime--punctuated by reports of
last weeks murder of Cesar Robles.

One resident directed me to the intersection of Green and
Wyoming, in which he stated four people have been murdered there over the
past few years.

Another life-long resident said that Hazleton used to be a
great place to raise a family until the "infiltrators" [illegal aliens]
began to move to Hazleton during the 1990's and kept coming--resulting in
an increase in gang activity, illegal narcotics trafficking, and crime.
Story to be continued...

Mayor Louis J. Barletta believes that the United States is the
greatest nation on Earth and is a place where people's dreams can come
true--and he wants to keep it that way.

As mayor of Hazleton, a small city in Pennsylvania, Barletta
had first-hand knowledge of the numerous problems that
illegal migration brought to local communities.

While Barletta welcomed legal immigrants to Hazleton, he witnessed
illegal aliens taking advantage of his community by draining
resources, displacing native workers, and engaging in
criminal activities--including illegal drugs and murder.

In order to maintain the quality of life that residents in Hazleton
had grown to expect, the mayor supported city ordinances that would make
it more difficult for illegal aliens to settle in Hazleton.

With Mayor Barletta's support, the City of Hazleton passed two ordinances.
Ordinance 2006-13, known as the Rental Registration Ordinance, which
requires renters to apply for an occupancy permit and include proof of
legal residency. Ordinance 2006-18, known as the
Illegal
Immigration Relief Act, prohibits persons or businesses in Hazleton
from harboring or employing illegal aliens.

However, soon after the ordinances were passed, they were
challenged in federal court by the ACLU
of Pennsylvania (and its Immigrants' Rights Project), the Puerto Rican
Legal Defense and Education Fund, the Community Justice Project, Cozen
O'Connor, and several area attorneys.

The plaintiffs' argued that the city was violating the
Supremacy Clause of the Constitution and peoples' due process and equal
protection rights.

In July, 2007, District Court Judge James Munley ruled that
Hazleton's two ordinances were unconstitutional and issued a restraining
order prohibiting the city from enforcing the ordinances.

The city
of Hazleton responded by appealing Judge Munley's decision in the 3rd
Circuit Court of Appeals. Barletta also established a legal
defense fund to help collecting private donations to defray the
city's mounting legal bills.

In September, 2010, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals upheld
District Court Judge Munley's decision, citing a number of
constitutional problems with the ordinances--including that Hazleton's
ordinances would preempt federal law--specifically the Immigration
Reform and Control Act and the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Not surprised that the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the
lower District Court, Barletta maintained the the ordinances were
constitutional and promised to appeal the 3rd Circuit Court's order.

U.S. Supreme Court Vacates Order

In June, 2011, soon after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a similar
case to Hazelton's ( U.S. Chamber of Commerce vs. Whiting), the Court
vacated and remanded the 3rd Circuit Appellate Court's decision against
Hazleton.

In August, 2011, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals vacated its
Hazleton decision. The Appellate Court will now review
updated briefs by those parties supporting and opposing Hazleton's
ordinances and set a date for oral argument prior to releasing another
decision.

Six year ago... 8-4-11
Jobs Protest:Fresh
Mark, Inc.

by Steve Salvi, Founder, Ohio
Jobs & Justice

Salem, Ohio -- Citizens concerned with the fairness of
the hiring practices of a large meat processing plant in Salem, Ohio,
rallied outside the plant's gate with signs and banners Wednesday.
The protest was sponsored by the Ohio Valley Tea Party and the Campaign
for Liberty.

Former and current employees at Fresh Mark, Inc., allege
that Fresh Mark is increasingly hiring Mexican and Guatemalan labor
rather than American workers from Columbiana and surrounding counties.

A call to Fresh Mark's corporate office requesting
statistics on the makeup of the Salem plant's labor force was not
returned.

One current worker (who wanted to remain anonymous for
fear of losing his job), estimated that Hispanic workers comprise 50% percent of first shift
workers; with even a larger percentage of Mexican and Guatemalan
workers' working second and third shifts at the Salem plant.

According to census figures, Hispanics comprise only
0.6% percent of the population in Salem and 1.17% in Columbiana County,
Ohio.

If the whistleblower's statistics are accurate, it begs
the question why the Fresh Mark workforce does not even remotely reflect
the racial/ethnic makeup of the community and region.

Salem's residents appear to agree with that something is
wrong at the Fresh Mark plant--as

almost every passing vehicle had someone waving, beeping their
horn in support, or giving
a thumbs-up gesture to the protesting citizens.

The most disturbing
allegation made by several different people at the protest was that
Hispanic children also work at the plant. One current
employee of Fresh Mark stated that he has spoken to a Hispanic worker
who admitted to being 15-years-old. It was alleged by another
person that when regulators visit the plant, some of the workers are
hidden away until they leave.

According to a recent news article in the Salem News, a Fresh
Mark spokesperson stated that its hiring practices are in full
compliance with federal law and that it uses the E-Verify program to
screen new hires for authorization to work in the United States.

However, a recent government sponsored report concluded that the
E-Verify program fails to identify over half of illegal alien workers
because they are using stolen valid Social Security numbers.

Are aging 60's
and 70's radicals now finalizing their Cloward-Piven
Strategy after taking control of well funded non-profits and
positions in local,
state, and federal government over the past 40 years?

(Note: Wikipedia is not an
authoritative source. For general informational purposes only.
Please do your own additional research on Cloward and Piven and what
became know as their strategy.)

Hispanic/Latino ethnocentrism:

The Tequila Party

Hispanic/Latino ethnocentric groups have become so frustrated with the
Democratic Party's failure to pass an amnesty for millions of illegal
aliens (the majority of which are Hispanic/Latino) they have been
contemplating the formation of their own ethnic political party.
Read story here. A
May, 2011
Christian Science Monitor story indicates that supporters of the
Tequila Party concept are already organizing for the 2012 presidential
election.

The truth
behind the failure of Democrats to fulfill the quid pro quo bid for Latino
votes is that the American public overwhelmingly oppose rewarding people
who broke U.S. law with amnesty and citizenship. Unlike Hispanic/Latino
cultures where corruption is rampant and the rule of law does not
exist, Americans overwhelmingly understand and support the rule of law.
The Democrats in Congress as a result could not get the votes in Congress
to pass an amnesty.

If the border is
so secure Mr. Obama, how did so many Mexican illegal aliens cross into the U.S.,
travel thousands of miles to Ohio without being arrested, and establish a major
criminal drug operation?

Washington, D.C.--Although the
budget impasse has been getting most of the media attention lately,
other bills are being introduced in Congress too. A number of
immigration enforcement bills have been introduced, including Duncan
Hunter's HR 1134 that would defund "sanctuary cities;" the LEAVE Act; HR
704 a/k/a the Security & Fairness Enhancement for America Act of 2011
(SAFE); HR 100 a/k/a the CLEAR Act; HR 800 a/k/a/ E-Law Act which would
mandate the use of the E-Verify program; HR 140 which addresses the
"anchor baby" birthright citizenship issue; and many more.

Illegal alien friendly House
Democrats and Republicans will find it difficult to stop some
enforcement legislation from passing because of the size of the
Republican caucus in the House. (Hopefully new House Speaker John
Boehner who has shown little interest in immigration enforcement during
his time in congress won't interfere.) The U.S. Senate
presents a greater challenge since Democrats still control that
chamber. However, some enforcement legislation may be palatable
(and politically expedient) enough to strip off sufficient votes from
Senate Democrats to pass. Perhaps a mandatory E-Verify bill
fits that description. It can be argued that the E-Verify program
is cost effective to businesses, errs in favor of the applicant, and
helps maintain a legal workforce--and primarily protects low income wage
earners who (in my opinion) are most likely to be displaced by
illegal foreign workers.

Selective Service does not collect any information which would indicate
whether or not you are undocumented. You want to protect
yourself for future U.S. citizenship and other government benefits and
programs by registering with Selective Service. Do it today.

If
you are a man ages 18 through 25 and living in the U.S., then you must
register with Selective Service. Itís the law. According to law, a man
must register with Selective Service within 30 days of his 18th
birthday. Selective Service will accept late registrations but not after
a man has reached age 26. You may be denied benefits or a job if you
have not registered. You can register at any U.S. Post Office and do not
need a social security number. When you do obtain a social
security number, let Selective Service know. Provide a copy of
your new social security number card; being sure to include your
complete name, date of birth, Selective Service registration number, and
current mailing address; and mail to the Selective Service System, P.O.
Box 94636, Palatine, IL 60094-4636.

Questions for your
cultural diversity study group:Since
many Ethiopian immigrants living in the U.S. continue to quietly
practice their culture of female genital mutilation in the
shadows of our communities, should Congress make female mutilation legal
so immigrants can have the ritual cutting, stitching, and binding
performed in hospitals? Should Medicare, Medicaid, or other
taxpayer funded program pay for the procedure if an immigrant family is
too poor to pay for the surgery? Discuss.

With the unprecedented influx of millions of
legal and illegal immigrants into the United States, many new and diverse cultural practices are being celebrated
in our communities across the United States. One new practice is female
genital mutilation.

The U.S. Department of State reports that in Ethiopia, it is
culturally encouraged to mutilate a female's genitals. In fact, in
a study of 65 of the country's 80 ethnic groups, over 70% of the female
population had some form of female genital mutilation. The
practice also take place in 27 other African countries. Many
immigrants continue the mutilation practice in the U.S.

Here is one female genital mutilation cultural
practice: Type
III

Type III is the excision (removal) of part or all of the external
genitalia (clitoris, labia minora and labia majora) and stitching or
narrowing of the vaginal opening, leaving a very small opening, about
the size of a matchstick, to allow for the flow of urine and menstrual
blood. The girl or woman's legs are then bound together from the hip to
the ankle so she remains immobile for approximately 40 days to allow for
the formation of scar tissue. [OJJPAC note: In the
U.S. we call this torture, for them it's a normal behavior.]

The fusion centers need to be monitored to make sure they
are not fed false reports by the SPLC, MALDF, LULAC, and ACLU, with the
purpose to discredit American patriot groups who support enforcement of
existing immigration laws as well as other issues which are supported by
the majority of the U.S. public. It's not comforting to know that
Ohio's discredited former public safety director under former Governor
Strickland had been a key member
of Ohio's fusion center.

OJJPAC position
(generally): The citizenship of a child should not be based on the
nation in which the child is born. A child's citizenship should be
based on the citizenship of the parents.

Q) Why do mainstream media outlets
continually exaggerate the importance of the so-called Latino vote? Here is an example.

A) The media hopes to encourage non-Latino
voters (the vast majority of the electorate) to accept as inevitable,
eventual Hispanic control of the USA. Therefore, in order to gain
favor with our future masters, it is wise to join them in supporting
amnesty for millions of illegal alien Latinos.

The reality: Latinos as a group are
of minor importance in comparison to the non-Latino vote.

OJJPAC note: Something continues to stink at
the Chicago shore--and it may involve millions of your tax dollars.
Could it be that Obama's old Chicago gang is "shoring-up" its Shore
Bank cronies with more federal funds? Does Shore Bank have the intension of
continuing its failed lending and operational policies--just under a
different name? Urban Partnership Bank? Why don't they
just call it "Social Justice Bank?"

Previous OJJPAC
article about Shore bank (see below):

More mischief from Obama's Chicago
gang:

Shore Bank.

While other so-called
journalists and investigative reporters sleep...

It appears that Obama and his
supporters are using "green" policy, the federal treasury, and non
profits, to create schemes to enrich themselves and at the same time
push their socialist agenda. That would explain why so many of
Obama's supporters were telling the American people that the earth
was overheating. Climategate took much of the wind out their
hysterical predictions as the public learned that the climate data
used to back their claims had been fudged by now discredited
scientists. ~ Steve Salvi, Founder, OJJPAC.org

Racism Industry
Review News:

Hispanic Illegal
Aliens accuse some African-Americans of committing hate crimes in New
York town

Woman to be lashed for not wearing a headscarf in a photograph and stoned for
adultery

Read story here.

Questions for your
cultural diversity study group:

Should
U.S. public and corporate diversity programs support and protect the
cultural practice of Iranian immigrants regarding women wearing
headscarves for photographs? Should the U.S. Congress legislate
special provisions allowing Iranian immigrants to stone people if
they commit adultery since it is their custom?

If the U.S. fails to allow Iranian immigrants to
to punish people according to their law or customs, does that make the
U.S. intolerant to other cultures or perhaps racist?

How does the Iranian culture benefit Americans? (Please list five
examples how Iranian culture contributes to our great melting pot.)

If diversity is our goal, should the U.S. embrace
Iranian culture and adopt their criminal penal code which would greatly
diversify punishment options and acts that would be classified as
crimes? Why or why not? Explain.

Culture clash

With the unprecedented influx of millions of
legal and illegal immigrants into the United States, many new and diverse cultural practices are
now being "celebrated"
in the United States.

Iranians for example have strict rules regarding the wearing of
headscarves and adultery. One woman reportedly got a sentence of 99
lashes for her "indecency" for getting photographed without her headscarf.
The same woman was sentenced to dealth by stoning for adultery.

The death sentence has reportedly been suspended due to international
political pressure on the Iranian government.