Search our Repository

Paper Details

Order a high quality custom written paper

This revision paper should be used as a source of ideas / reasoning / inspiration for your own research. You should never submit it as your own work.
Need something custom and original? Choose from a wide range of academic writing tasks and get the one you need.

* Once your purchase is processed by paypal you will be redirected back to this page and you'll have
the option to download the paper. We'll also send the paper to your paypal email address as proof of purchase.

Argument Of Ignorance

Question

This is the synopsis:

Synopsis of Keith DeRose’s “Solving the Skeptical Problem”

Contextualism in epistemology aims at solving the skeptical problem, as presented in the argument from ignorance:

1. I don’t know that not-H;2. If I don’t know that not-H, then I don’t know that O., so C. I don’t know that O. H is a skeptic hypothesis (like I am a bodiless brain in a vat) and O is an ordinary belief (like I have hands).

Solution

Title:
Argument Of Ignorance
Length:
5 pages
(1430 Words)
Style:
MLA

Preview

Outline

The puzzle of skeptical hypotheses

Contextualist solutions: the basic strategy

Nozick’s solution and the abominable conjunction

The subjunctive conditionals Account (SCA) of the Plausibility of AI’s first premise

Strength of Epistemic position and AI’s second premise

Strength and sensitivity

Introduction

There have been some formulations aimed at solving the argument of reason as evident in Keith DeRose’s book. Contextualization, strategy of the contextualize area are good examples of how it can be achieved. Although philosophers have formulated various analogies that are set to help in solving the problem of argument of reason, this can be achieved by establishing the claim of the argument from ignorance. The last stems from the truth of its first and second premises; such scenario is possible under the premises that the context has significantly high standards.