she is considered white?? , come on guys do better than that. you should use a litmus test; would you marry her, take her home and other white friends and family have no doubt she is white, would your kids look white? look on the brown knuckles the head shape cheek bone structure, jaw bone. and curly black hair?
just to help you WN out, here is an easy observation: even if you see white skin; coloured knuckles, elbows and knees is the give away.

doesn't look white to me, looks more arabian, i have seen whiter people in the OV section given a tongue lashing along with the "mutt" designation.

It seems any sort of mutts who doesn't look too dark is going to be considered white nowdays, it seems WN in general prefer quantity over quality...

Quote:Are Greek Cypriots white?I think it's important to look into their ancestors to determine what they are.

Why bother. Just look at them now

If they're white, then White Nationalism just entered Full Coping Mode.

Storm front is mostly an American site and probably more than half white Americans now have non-European blood in them.

So it's them that "cope" mainly I think and try to move the goalposts, like they may say I'm Irish and German blood but my grandpa was a Cherokee red Indian and his father was mixed from when his father raped a black slave on his farm. Most modern ones are mixed with hispanics, mixed natives blood from south america.

Some white people living out of of Europe do have dark hair and brown eyes though, they may be more European that the ones with blonde and blue, who may have mixed ancestry in fact.

(09-01-2015, 05:25 PM)Gandharva Wrote: they(cypriots and islander greeks who are darker and more ethnic than slavic admixed mainland greeks) are whiter than most spaniards for sure.have you seen most spaniards?lol

I went to Spain and most people looked like normal whites. Fair-skin tonnes and light hair were common. I've never seen a blonde, blue-eyed Cypriot before.

Cypriots have much higher frequency of dark hair and eyes. They do look more ethnic than their mainland cousins. They also look more ethnic than the Spanish people that I've seen.

When you see groups of Spanish school tourists in London, they look like they could be from anywhere in Europe. It's only when you get nearer and hear them speaking Spanish that you realise where they're from.

Btw the reason I know very well how Cyriots look is because I lived in Little Cyprus, which has the highest number of Cypriots outside of Cyprus anywhere in the world.
PS: Greek Cypriots share their island with Turks, let's not forget that. Turkish Cypriots look 200% ethnic.

(09-01-2015, 09:04 PM)Mle Wrote: Btw the reason I know very well how Cyriots look is because I lived in Little Cyprus...

And why did you live there?
Bam. I knew you were ethnic. There's no place like home (Cyprus) eh
You should do an admixture test and post the results here

It's a place in London. It's not actually called Little Cyprus that's just a nickname I gave to it. London is a diverse place if you didn't know already.

Instead of there being a lot of Pakistanis and Indians like there are in many parts of London and England, there are many Greek and Turkish Cypriots (probably accounting for 25-30% of the area's population).

(09-01-2015, 04:41 PM)DyingHope Wrote: Storm front is mostly an American site and probably more than half white Americans now have non-European blood in them.

So it's them that "cope" mainly I think and try to move the goalposts, like they may say I'm Irish and German blood but my grandpa was a Cherokee red Indian and his father was mixed from when his father raped a black slave on his farm. Most modern ones are mixed with hispanics, mixed natives blood from south america.

Some white people living out of of Europe do have dark hair and brown eyes though, they may be more European that the ones with blonde and blue, who may have mixed ancestry in fact.

Why do so many Eurofags think this?

If somebody's grandpa was a Cherokee Indian they'd never live it down, believe me. It's considered cool to liberal hipsters to have some distant native american ancestry (many people actually lie about it, tons of blacks say this) and you get affirmative action benefits if you can prove it. One American megaliberal congresswoman (Elizabeth Warren) lied about it, actually, and used it to get into Harvard or yale or something and would constantly pull out that claim (she claimed she was 1/64th native).

Most american whites are not part black nor part native American. This is Eurofag delusions.

I'm taller, better, more sociable, and more attractive than you. Your opinion has zero credibility compared to mine.

If somebody's grandpa was a Cherokee Indian they'd never live it down, believe me. It's considered cool to liberal hipsters to have some distant native american ancestry (many people actually lie about it, tons of blacks say this) and you get affirmative action benefits if you can prove it. One American congresswoman (Elizabeth Warren) lied about it, actually, and used it to get into Harvard or yale or something (she claimed she was 1/64th native).

Most american whites are not part black nor part native American. This is Eurofag delusions.

You know these guys? Famous youtubers. The guy on the left (Rhett) took an ancestry test by subscriber request and turns out he's 4% sub-saharan african. Just lol at how you can pick any random, light featured american and chances are that they have some bbc genes in them.

(09-07-2015, 01:14 AM)Hangman Wrote: You know these guys? Famous youtubers. The guy on the left (Rhett) took an ancestry test by subscriber request and turns out he's 4% sub-saharan african. Just lol at how you can pick any random, light featured american and chances are that they have some bbc genes in them.

I don't give a fuck about 'famous youtubers' you eceleb obsessed faggot. Go read a book instead of watching losers on youtube sometime please.

So some 23andme result says someone had 4% african ancestry. Ever heard of a margin of error? He could have genes that africans also possess. Even if he was 1/1000000th black, how do you extrapolate this to all white people in the USA?

I'm taller, better, more sociable, and more attractive than you. Your opinion has zero credibility compared to mine.

(09-07-2015, 01:14 AM)Hangman Wrote: You know these guys? Famous youtubers. The guy on the left (Rhett) took an ancestry test by subscriber request and turns out he's 4% sub-saharan african. Just lol at how you can pick any random, light featured american and chances are that they have some bbc genes in them.

I don't give a fuck about 'famous youtubers' you eceleb obsessed faggot. Go read a book instead of watching losers on youtube sometime please.

So some 23andme result says someone had 4% african ancestry. Ever heard of a margin of error? He could have genes that africans also possess. Even if he was 1/1000000th black, how do you extrapolate this to all white people in the USA?

Being Portuguese, I have people in my family tree that look partially Arab. My nieces look half-Arab. But they are adorable. White dick in brown pussy leads to positive consequences. :H: Their mother is also Portuguese. But she obviously has some Moorish blood in her. Since she looks part-Arab.

America is the same country where Irish and Italians were not considered white when they first arrived but eventually became white. Now they consider Arabs to be white according to the census. There is a book called the Wage of Whiteness or something which says that as long as an ethnic group hates blacks, they earn white status in the eyes of the Anglos.

The reality is that to most of the known world, the true whites are Anglos, Germans, Dutch, Scandinavians, and to an extent the French. Most people do not even consider Italians and Spaniards to be white even though both groups look clearly white, same with the Slavs. White is as much of a race thing as it is a status thing.

White features + successful nationality = White

White features + unsuccessful nationality = White in appearance but viewed as ethnics

(09-07-2015, 01:42 AM)SeriousM Wrote: America is the same country where Irish and Italians were not considered white when they first arrived but eventually became white. Now they consider Arabs to be white according to the census. There is a book called the Wage of Whiteness or something which says that as long as an ethnic group hates blacks, they earn white status in the eyes of the Anglos.

The reality is that to most of the known world, the true whites are Anglos, Germans, Dutch, Scandinavians, and to an extent the French. Most people do not even consider Italians and Spaniards to be white even though both groups look clearly white, same with the Slavs. White is as much of a race thing as it is a status thing.

White features + successful nationality = White

White features + unsuccessful nationality = White in appearance but viewed as ethnics

"White" has always had a weird classification. Thats why i dont use white to identify people of European ancestry

The sub-8 law refers to systematic legal oppression of non-attractive men (more specifically, men rated below 8 in attractiveness).