I have not been delivering posts for this blog of late for a number of reasons, but this is one that I must write. Normally, I provide solutions, but in this case I have no solutions to offer. Now that the primaries are underway and some have finished, we begin to see the landscape shaping toward a removal of incumbents in both parties. While the removal of incumbents, especially those who are progressive socialists / large central government heavy spending types is essential, we are headed to a dramatic radical change in this nation; one that we have never experienced, at least in my lifetime. When we complete the purge of the Congress in both the House and Senate (only one-third of the senate is up for reelection) in the general election, we will have created a powerful lame-duck beast.

From November 3rd through and including January 3rd 2011, we will have between 40 and 50 unseated politicians who have nothing to lose by doing President Obama’s bidding. The draconian severity of the legislation these lame ducks will pass for their President to sign will be earthshaking. We will see amnesty and citizenship for illegal aliens, and a bailout of the union pension funds. Keep in mind that the unions have unsustainable pension problems because they simply cannot fund the promises made and they have used their available funds to get socialist progressive candidates elected. During this dark period we will see our government collected tax money used to reimburse unions for the vast sums they poured into the campaigns of the folks who will now pay them back with our money. This means that these unions will have dramatically transformed our America from what we know with our own money.

You might say that when we have replaced these incumbents with fresh faces we can reverse the legislation of the 111th Congress. Well we will need two-thirds of each house to override the President’s veto. During this period of lame duck representation, those who are shy right now in the campaign period to increase our deficit and our debt will be unshackled from the fear of being voted out. They will now be able to set a record for stimulus, earmarks, and progressive big government legislation, along with a massive cap-and-trade bill to solve an imaginary man-made climate problem – it is really a worldwide wealth redistribution tax that will be imposed.

We will see Puerto Rico as our 51st state, an end to drilling for oil in this country, and the beginning of serfdom for the citizens of the United States of America. We will also see an intentional further opening of the border with Mexico. Every dream that the progressive wealth redistribution activists have ever had will become a reality during this lame duck period – they will have nothing to lose.

President Obama will be served his radical transformation of America on a silver platter – he will only have to sign legislation. During the revolution lame-duck period there will be no checks and balance system that we need to protect this country from ruin.

Over the last few years our school children have been taught a new subject. Let’s call it Capitalism Bad; Socialism Good. You may not be aware but this socialist almost marxist propaganda has left college campuses and is now finding its way to our middle schools. The theory and goal behind this video, produced by the “Tides Foundation”—a socialist redistribution driven organization, is to indoctrinate young children during their impressionable years, before they have learned to rationally think and question.

Of course, parents are kept in the dark, by the “all knowing” educators, who have embraced this ideology. The lead instructional lesson is called The Story of Stuff. This is a twenty minute video complete with a classroom quiz and related teaching and study material. The Story of Stuff provides questionable information that is contrary to what is the economic model that has made this country great, capitalism. This video is filled with false statements and half-truths. The clear intent is to mislead impressionable minds; to convince these minds that the ideology presented is common fact. This video is clearly propaganda indoctrination. Here is what that bastion of conservative think, The New York Times, has to say about this video in “A Cautionary Video About America’s ‘Stuff’”

“…The video is a cheerful but brutal assessment of how much Americans waste, and it has its detractors. But it has been embraced by teachers eager to supplement textbooks that lag behind scientific findings on climate change and pollution. And many children who watch it take it to heart…”

“If you want freedom, peace and prosperity for people all over the globe, you want capitalism. Protestors at the G-20 Summit would have us believe otherwise. So would the creators of the Story of Stuff, an anti-free-market film seen by tens of thousands of school children who now believe capitalism means trashing the earth and stealing resources from poor people.

It would be good if our schools began teaching intellectually honest economics. But most do not. What if all policymakers understood the connections between peace and personal liberty; prosperity and free markets; justice and risk?…”

You may want to go to the Evergreen Freedom Foundation website and learn who they are and their mission. This appears to be a solid and balanced organization.

The New York Times article states that

“…Which is one reason ‘The Story of Stuff’, a 20-minute video about the effects of human consumption, has become a sleeper hit in classrooms across the nation.”

A sleeper hit with whom? Is it a sleeper hit with parents? Have parents been told that it would be in the lessons? The piece states that the government exists to take care of us, well James Madison and the other Founders are rolling over on that statement alone. It is wrong about how much is spent on defense and how must forest remain. It even uses a military tank to represent the government—how balanced is that?

The funeral for the main stream cable broadcast media is occurring today. At this writing, note this post’s date and time of 2:05 PM EDT, the Mall in Washington, D.C. is filled with Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, and Independents. TV pictures reveal that the Mall is tightly packed from the Capitol to the Washington Monument, with overflow, as a CBS affiliate reports, onto Pennsylvania Avenue from the Capitol to the White House.

The Fourth Estate, aptly brought to life by Edmund Burke in the House of Commons on a particular session during the 19th century, is the press. The clergy, nobles, and commoners being the other three. These estates were essentially the makeup of the British government at that time. He referred to the Fourth Estate as the most powerful of the estates present that day in the House of Commons—they were in the gallery. Closer to home, our Founding Fathers believed the Fourth Estate was similarly powerful and sufficiently independent to keep the three branches of our new government in check. This is why freedom of the press is clearly written into our Constitution. They were depending on the press to keep government honest. In no way did they ever believe that the press would become complicit with the government and withhold key pieces of news, slant the news coverage, and become the house organ of two of the three branches of government.

Incredibly, at this writing CNN is broadcasting a Barack Obama speech on reform before a large partisan audience. It is yet another speech by him in three or so days on healthcare reform—are they expecting him to say something new? The President is stumping in relatively Democratic conclaves trying to repair the breach in his Party over health insurance reform—this breach has gone mostly unreported by CNN. At this writing, MSNBC had planned a televised mystery / crime documentary which must be quite good and must serve the public interest to allow them to skip reporting about a long time planned event at the Mall in the nation’s capitol, now mostly filled with grass roots demonstrators made up of every day citizen protestors. It now appears that MSNBC did manage to do some reporting of the event after all. These protesters are mostly against big government and big spending, regardless of political party. If this were an anti-war rally, MSNBC would be reporting. If this was a Obama campaign rally, they would be reporting with flourishes.

The estimate for the attendance by the Park Police is 60,000. Recently, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives, issued a memo claiming that 2 Million will show. She was setting ultra high expectations, so she could later minimize any protest significance. Well if the Mall is filled, depending on how tightly packed it is, it can hold anywhere between 1.7 Million to 2.1 Million people. TV pictures indicate that the Mall is filled. Remember CBS reported that crowd overflow filled Pennsylvania Avenue. Of course, government estimates, the Speaker’s estimates, and the news media’s estimates will be substantially minimized to accommodate their agenda. The Washington Post had an article written at the inauguration of President Obama about how many people the Mall can hold—Mall information found at the Washington Post click here.

Based on the broadbased main stream media failed reporting on the just broken high impact ACORN story and the failed or minimal reporting on the Tea Party protests around the country today, I can only state, if you are depending on this dead media for information, you are uninformed. The exceptions are those of you who are getting your news from Fox or by searching the internet for real news, not a blog like mine, otherwise you are seriously in the dark and cannot make informed decisions about our nation’s future. If you meet this uninformed criteria, then careful, you are being manipulated with all the news these “news” operations deem you should have, with the slant they want you to have.

This ideological conspiracy is an attempt at censorship plain and simple. MSNBC and now apparently CNN among other complicit news organizations are attempting to feed the populace with what they want us to know and are withholding selected news. If it weren’t for Fox News Channel and the internet—call it the Fifth Estate, they would be successful in using censorship to manage government propaganda. Are we living in a free nation or are we in a government and media controlled society, like Venezuela and Iran?

We can officially declare September 10, 2009 the day honest media was laid to rest. The breaking ACORN story—a viral internet story—broken by a new internet site “BigGovernment.Com”, and specifically James O’Keefe is a first class newsworthy story. The story is clearly seriously detrimental to ACORN and the multitude of politicians in Congress and in the White House who have allied themselves with ACORN.

The Story, the back story, and extensive video can be seen at BigGovernment.Com: click here and review all the video clips, including the Glen Beck of Fox News clip.

The story is big since ACORN receives millions in federal money—our tax money—and will receive Billions from the recent stimulus bill. We know of ACORN activities from reports of rampant national voter registration fraud allegedly perpetrated by ACORN during the 2008 election cycle. We also know that our President was a community organizer attorney advising ACORN for years. We know of his intimate relationship and his history with ACORN during his Illinois Senate days, United States Senate Days, his campaign, and now his enthusiastic interaction with ACORN while President of the United States.

ACORN is clearly affiliated with SEIU, the Service Employees International Union—those folks who wear the purple shirts—through common related management and common addresses. SEIU was instrumental in fostering an Obama victory by providing heaps of union dues money and plentiful union volunteers. Of late it was utilized to picket the homes of financial executives in Connecticut over bonuses.

This story is huge from so many directions and it, if completely developed, could lead right to the White House and Congress. Yet, no major news outlet is running with it to any legitimate extent, except Fox News.

Remember these ACORN folks specialize in helping community people to get the most from their government and regularly provide help and advice on how to maximize their members’ opportunities with applications for welfare, other government monetary assistance. And now we see they have mortgage specialists providing “special” assistance.

Big Questions:

How many mortgages that ended in foreclosure and helped tank our economy were made possible by the apparent “extreme” advice provide by ACORN to non-qualified applicants? How many non-qualified applicants qualified due to the “extreme” mortgage application and supporting documents advice provided by ACORN around the country? I use the word “extreme” to indicate that where there is smoke, etc., …well you get the point.

Just how much do our Representatives and Senators, such as Barney Frank and Chris Dodd among others in Congress, know about ACORN’s activities and why haven’t we seen any Congressional investigations operate with a full head of steam? John Conyers was going to initiate an investigation, but cancelled it saying that “powers-to-be decided not to investigate”. Who are the powers-to-be? Who is protecting ACORN in the Congress and possibly the White House?

Why is the main stream media complicit in playing down or simply not reporting what appears to be massive fraud? Is there a conspiracy of major media to lead us down the primrose path to socialism with a generous helping of organized community groups and political corruption tossed in for flavor?

The media is more concerned with Fox and now O’Keefe of BigGovernment.Com than with the real story. The trusting public has been steered by most big media to support the current administration and the current administration was not and is not vetted and challenged. Either big media is complicit with intentionally steering the populace or it is just terrible incompetent and gullible. Either way Americans who still get their news from the big media, other than Fox and a few other outlets are woefully uninformed.

Recently Robin Roberts of ABC interviewed President Obama about his healthcare proposals and she asked him about the distraction of losing Van Jones. Bill O’Reilly of Fox News expertly pointed out on his show that Roberts more correctly should have asked him why was Van Jones picked to be in his administration as an unconfirmed Czar. She should have asked what is and how deep is Obama’s relationship with this avowed communist and ex-convict. (Have we ever had an ex-convict be a Presidential advisor?) It appears that either Roberts is incompetent or she is attempting to help our President achieve his goals regardless of all the issues surrounding those goals.

We simply cannot trust most main stream media any longer as, with very few exceptions, honest media died some time ago—it was officially laid to rest yesterday.

Let’s for a moment put party labels aside. The Republicans, Libertarians, independents, and the Democrats are no more, for the sake of this post. Let’s look at politicians and advocates only as proponents of public sector or the private sector.

The proponents of public sector support the government’s caretaking of its people, either through public or co-op option medical care, providing money for car purchases, subsidizing power generation, and so on and so on—spending everywhere.

The private sector proponents seek growth of industry and economies, healthier paychecks for all, faith based options for caretaking, and wealth generation for reinvestment into greater wealth generation for all.

The public sector advocates want to spend resources on all sorts of programs but struggle with how to pay for the largess. Remember the public sector produces nothing. It is simply a drain on the economy and cannot be sustained. Taxing the rich and businesses will generate funds for near term projects, but over time the law of diminishing returns kicks in and the cupboard runs bare. There is a limit to how much money can be pulled out of an economy to pay for public sector programs—the limit is what gets put back into the economy to replace what was spent. Remember as you grow the public sector you shrink the private sector. Soon the private sector will disappear and the public sector will have to provide less and less for the populace—rationing.

Remember the empty store shelves in the Soviet Union? Well this will happen here if the production economy does not grow. Unless we find a way to grow our economy we will not survive. This country has been a consumer and not a production economy for nearly 40 years. All this has done is deplete our reserves, build debt, make the dollar weaker, and make us unable to replenish what we are spending—we simply consume. As a nation will will run out of whatever wealth we have left.

Just look at how the government has reacted to the current fiscal crisis. It was brought on by debt. Now we are fixing the problem by growing the public sector and we are borrowing to get out of debt—does this make sense to anyone. We should have ignited the private sector by placing a moratorium of income taxes for two or three years—it would have cost the same as the unproductive stimulus, but it would have already begun paying big dividends.

The private sector advocates want smaller government, with the government being a small drain on the results of the private sector economy. If the private sector is supported by the government through lower taxes, less restrictive rules, use of natural resources that allow the private sector to produce, the economy will produce, export, grow jobs and this will feed on itself, as if it were a perpetual engine—okay I exaggerate a bit.

If this government fosters a strong small business segment and a somewhat controlled big business segment usually through competition, but with legitimate— not choking —government regulation, the private sector over the long term will grow, and provide prosperity. Since the public sector produces nothing, and is a 100 % drain on resources, it can never produce prosperity, that is unless we can have a replay of the miracle of the loaves and the fishes .

There are those who say that profit is bad, well unless these anti-profit people can offer another way to grow and replenish an economy to continue to deliver these goods and services, private sector profit is the only way to go. Remember, how long can government deliver these goods and services without replenishing what has been used? Remember the Soviet Union store shelves.

Now I make the leap to government medical care. Forget about the lack of efficiency and effectiveness in anything the government does. Let us simply look at the non-replenished resources from a stagnant public sector economy. How much time will pass before medical rationing must occur in a service driven by an economy that does not grow—it only shrinks.

Anyone who has not as yet joined the flat earth society should seriously consider that when you vote for a representative, that representative should be a long term thinker and always vote to build and grow an economy by producing. If the person is a short term thinker and only believes in picking the fruit from the tree without ever feeding or water it, then you will get the diminishing public sector option and everyone will be equally poor.

With the Congress out of control, with 14 now 34 Czars and counting not answerable to the Congress reporting to President Obama, with U.S. Government ownership of GM and Chrysler, with first position bond holders tossed aside in favor of a union – forever altering the investment landscape where for hundreds of years bond holders were protected and now are no longer protected – forever dampening the economy and causing future corporate fund raising to be very difficult and expensive, with the Treasury’s refusal to let some banks pay back their TARP money, with the proposals to establish national health care and a valued added tax to pay for it, with the marching order from the President of the United States to get this done by August, it is clear that the Federal Government looks at states as little fiefdoms subservient to the federal government.

Well, it is the other way around. Someone in Washington D.C. and particularly in the Obama Administration should read the Constitution. On more than one occasion President Obama has indicated that the Constitution is too restrictive of the federal (central) government and that the constitution should allow for the central government to make more rules to deliver services to the populace – often services not equally targeted toward all Americans. His appointment of an activist judge for the Supreme Court is his attempt to make law and make constitutional law from the bench of the highest court in the land. This must stop and stop now.

I have written the following similar letters to Governors Sanford of South Carolina, Perry of Texas, and Freudenthal of Wyoming. This is the letter written to Rick Perry.

June 4, 2009

Rick Perry, Governor, State of Texas

Office of the Governor
P.O. Box 12428
Austin, Texas 78711-2428

Re: States Rights

Dear Governor;

I sent this note yesterday to Governor Dave Freudenthal of Wyoming.

Owing to the recent actions and planned actions (it all can’t be interstate commerce) by the Federal Government which are not within the 17 enumerated powers provided the U.S. Government in the Constitution, and the Obama supporting Congress, have you considered a law suit in Federal Court re-asserting the rights and powers of the states found in the Constitution? The goal is to stop this runaway madness and socialization of the private sector.

I suggest Wyoming because you have the greatest Republican majority of any state legislature. I also suggest a state file the suit since there should be no question about legal standing in the courts. This will probably work its way up to the Supreme Court.

Clearly as a state, Wyoming has the right to require the federal government to limit itself to the 17 powers and the few amendments describing the limits of power of the U.S. Government.

I represent no faction or organization. I write as an individual. I am not an attorney. I am an individual who sees the best of this nation disappearing more and more each day. President Obama and his Treasury among other Departments and the Congress are out of control and need to be reined in. Will you do it? Can you do it?

Governor Perry, perhaps you might contact Governor Freudenthal and encourage him to file that suit. Perhaps you may wish the former Republic and the State Texas to join him. Unless the states take action now, states rights will be gone forever and we will not recognize this nation by the next Presidential election. I will also be writing to Governor Mark Sanford of South Carolina. I am not writing Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona, as I do not believe she has the fervor for righting this Constitutional wrong.

With the sincerest pleading, I am

Ken Moyes

I suggest that anyone who reads this post and feels that the federal government is out of control and is assuming the rights provided the states under the constitution (see Today’s Federal Government is Unconstitutional) should write to their Governor or to the Governors listed in this post Just go to a search engine and enter the state followed by “governor” and it will bring up a link to that state’s governor.

Unless we do something now, we will not recognize this country by the next Presidential election. Stand up and be counted!

Many people in perceived fairness say that President Obama is in office a little more than two months, so we should give him a chance. To these people I ask, how long do you give a new nanny who demonstrates poor child rearing skills, with your children? For the ladies, how long do you allow a new beautician who is clearly doing her own thing and not doing what is best for you to continue before you yell stop? We are seeing so called fixes to our economic problems that are not economic problem fixes. We are seeing major changes to our civic culture under the guise of fixing our economic problem. We are seeing a serious threat to our constitution, by a man who openly does not like our constitution the way it was written.

President Obama is a “big government” – government is intended to take care of people – kind of guy. Just listen to his own words. He is asking to spend hundreds of billions on energy, health care, and education – sounds noble, but he has no plan on how to spend this money. No businessman in the world could borrow money without a business plan, yet he wants multiple billions without a plan – he wants you to buy into his wishes sight unseen – something like buying land (swampland) in Florida. This massive spending on noble targets may sound great, but you need to lift the hood to see just what happens when the big government engine is turned on. In the world of gross domestic product, government produces nothing – it is a drain. It does not foster job growth. It does not provide the necessesary economic energy to sustain growth and to keep on delivering. Government simply takes from the producers and the only thing it gives back is a portion of what it has taken – the rest is government overhead. Over time, the producers stop producing because there is no upside for them to produce.

Sure government can create jobs, government jobs, and this does two things that should make you run from government intrusion in your life. First, any government job created takes away from the producers the ability to produce, grow, and create jobs with a multiplier effect. It must continue to take from the producer to support the government created job. Second, the government created job, as it takes away from private sector job growth, keeps you permanently chained to the government to keep your job. Some may say – “what is wrong with a good job from the government?” – the answer is that the government job is not sustainable and that over time, the ecomony and quality of life shrink. As the economy shrinks, the government must take more and more from the remaining producers to sustain those made up government jobs – remember, government jobs produce nothing and add nothing to the economy. As more and more is taken, the producers produce less due to loss of economic motivation – this becomes a cycle of doom. Countless countries have tried this and met the same result – failure.

Throughout history in Latin America, South America, Europe, and Asia (most of the globe), power hungry despots and some well meaning socialists have adopted the control afforded by socialism and the “government can do it all” approach, and failed miserably. Our current President is an academic with a law degree. He has never produced, never managed anything, and appears to have never studied history on the failure rate of big government socialism. That is, unless he is not concerned with 100% failure rate or the success of the venture (we cannot call it an experiment since the experiment failed in a plethora of tests around the globe), and he is only seeking the control and power that comes to a few, not the masses, from the big government socialist venture.

The following is Barack Obama, when he was a state senator, in his own words describing why our constitution is flawed and in need of change. If this does not send chills up your spine, then you have not been paying attention. He feels that the constitution does not provide government with sufficient powers. In this video Mr. Obama telegraphs just where he wants to take this country with the big government socialist approach. The video was found on a blog Bob’s Bites. (Thank you Bob’s Bites).

This bullet train approach to CHANGE toward a big government socialist nation with an understanding that the constitution does not permit the kind of change being attempted, must be stopped. Unfortunately, President Obama will be in office for four years and the current very left, very socialist Democratic Party controlled Congress will be intact for two years, making the stopping of this train very difficult, but not impossible.

We need to pressure the members of the U.S. Senate’s Democratic Party who hold the more moderate and conservative economic voting records in the Democratic Party Senate caucus and three Republican RINO’s (republicans in name only) to act as a buffer and to take steps to retard the hi-speed approach to socialist economic change. We must pressure these Senators to slow the massive government spending for big government. This government spending is not sustainable and simply cannot be repaid. You see, right now, the government is a sub-prime borrower seeking an unsustainable mortgage – have you heard this before? This is what got us into this mess and now we are attempting to spend our way to prosperity and borrow our way out of debt – show me one budget text book that portends a happy outcome when you spend more than you can produce for a sustained time. One book does explain this unique economic plan – it is the bible – the new testament to be exact. It is commonly known as the “Miracle of the Loaves and the Fishes”. Unfortunately for us, while Barack Obama may think he can walk on water – he cannot and he cannot perform the “Miracle of the Loaves and the Fishes” or make wine from water!

Do what you can to stop this bullet train, before it is too late! Tell them (cut and paste the statement if you wish):

“Stop the over the top spending and borrowing now – don’t destroy our country! Socialism does not work!”

The Democratic Senators in the Senate, with the most conservative economic voting records and the three Republicans (RINOs), who should be pressured are: