On Jan 21, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Excellent idea. It is a shame content owners do not see the utility
>> in your idea.
>>>> To bring this back to an operational topic, just because a content
>> owner does not want to work with someone on this, does the lack of
>> external bandwidth / infrastructure / whatever make it "OK" to
>> install
>> a proxy which will intentionally re-write the content?
>> This really boils down to "who is more important? The content or the
> contents' eyeballs?"
>> (Or the people having to deliver said content to said eyeballs, and
> aren't being paid by the content deliverer on their behalf.)
No, it does not.
If I own something, it doesn't matter how "important" the people who
want to buy it are.
But I guess that's not operational.
--
TTFN,
patrick