Welcome! We regret to inform you that the Injury Board National News Desk has been discontinued. Feel free to browse around and enjoy our previously published articles, or visit The Injury Blog Network for the latest in personal injury news.

IMAGE SOURCE: New York Times Web site/ Harry and Louise and Chris Dodd

You might remember them from ads that ran in 1993 and 1994 to scuttle the Clinton health reform movement.

Harry and Louise, a fictional suburban middle-age couple, sat around the kitchen table and stoked fears that a government-created health plan would put the decisions about health care in the hands of bureaucrats.

Now Harry and Louise have returned with a new campaign and message that’s done a 180. A little older, once again sitting around the table, the fictional characters are now supporting an overhaul of the medical system.

Harry: “Looks like we may get health care reform”

Louise: “It’s about time because every day more and more people are finding they can’t afford health care.”

Harry: “Or they’re losing coverage”

Louise: “We need good coverage that people can afford coverage they can get…”

Harry: “Even if they have a pre-existing condition

Louise: “And coverage they can keep if they change jobs …”

Harry: “…or lose their jobs. Sounds simple enough.”

Louise: “A little more cooperation and a little less politics and we can get the job done this time.”

The $4 million ad campaign has been paid for by the Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America/ Families USA.

Why the Change?

Why the change in message this time around?

The 1993-94 ads were sponsored by the health insurance industry and intended to stoke fears about socialized medicine and government choosing our health care.

This time around the ads are sponsored by a trade group representing drug companies, and the actors Harry Johnson and Louise Claire Clark are empathetic toward mounting unemployment and the rising cost of health insurance.

PhRma or Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the sponsor of the new spot, last month pledged $80 billion in savings to lower drug prices.

President of the group, Bill Tauzin urges compromise. “Middle-class people like Harry and Louise are not going to be living in a successful society if we don’t do something about it” he says to the Times.

Families USA, a nonprofit and non-partisan group also behind the campaign, has doctors, a Common Cause representative as well as someone from Blue Cross, Blue Shield on its board.

Calling itself a Voice for Health Care Consumers, the ads should begin airing on CNN, MSNBC, Fox, and the Sunday talk shows.

President Obama has vowed to bring health insurance to more than 46 million Americans who lack it with a $1 trillion reform over ten years.

AMA Support

While drug companies and doctors along with the insurance lobby were the leading obstacles to health care reform in 1993, on Thursday the American Medical Association endorsed the House version of healthcare form. The powerful lobbying arm has never previously endorsed reform.

The AMA supports what’s being called America’s Affordable Health Choices, which would create a marketplace for individuals and small employers to choose among private and public insurance. It would also slow the annual reductions to Medicare reimbursements to doctors.

According to a Gallup Poll released last month, Americans have the least confidence in health insurance companies and Republican leaders in Congress to fix the healthcare system. Americans polled have the most confidence in doctors, healthcare professors and researchers, hospitals and the president to lead reforms.

Kennedy Missing

Sen. Ted Kennedy is missed in the Senate as it tangles over the legislation. Kennedy, 77, is battling brain cancer and has bill missing from Capitol Hill since April, opting to stay on Cape Cod undergoing new chemotherapy treatments.

His lifelong work on health care reform, and his ability to forge compromises across the aisle have been missed, according to lawmakers speaking to the New York Times, and the chairman seat of the health Education and Labor Committee work has been turned over to Sen. Christopher Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut. #

1 Comment

Posted by BrittanicusFriday, July 17, 2009 4:05 PM EST

CHOOSING THE USUAL PROFITING INSURANCE COMPANY, OR CHOOSING GOVERNMENT PLAN SHOULD BE UP TO AMERICANS?The deciding factor in implementing health care for everybody--LEGALLY--in America, is the Publics voice? Those who want to just follow the same old road, can do so with the profit taking commercial insurance. Those who would be satisfied with a government run health care program, can now start demanding it from the lawmakers. Those who see a Universal health care system, similar to most developed countries in Europe, should start informing every Representative and Senate politician starting today. Rationing in places like England, was caused by the major impact of uncontrolled immigration. I see--THE RATS--are coming out of the woodwork, using propaganda and downright lies about government run medical care?

The Special interest lobby, status quo have very wealthy fingers in the pie and do not want Health care for everybody? It's a trillion dollar business like Cancer treatments. The pharmaceutical companies, AMA and others have very much to lose? Even many corrupt politicians are stockholders in this behemoth money machine. Most American working class can do--without-- high premiums, pre-existing condition clauses. deductibles, co-pays that is representative of the wealthy medical care insurers. Whatever pertains to your family, you should start ruffling the indifferent feathers of the people in Washington at 202-224-3121 Just like illegal immigration , we cannot afford anymore to subsidize the business that hire them or the millions of illegal families.

Comments for this article are closed.

About the National News Desk

Our mission is to seek the complete truth and provide a full and fair account of the events and issues that surround personal safety, accident prevention, and injury recovery. We are committed to serving the public with honesty and integrity in these efforts.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when
comments are made on this post.

Who We AreThe Legal Examiner offers both bloggers and readers the opportunity to share their thoughts and opinions on all things law. From news on current legislative efforts to practical guidance on everyday legal issues, The Legal Examiner will have it covered. Learn More