The Islamic group, Hamas, that govern the Gaza strip in solitary for years, radicalized his leadership after the election of Yahya Sinwar, one of the principal ringleaders and one of the principal persons that helped in the formation of the Hamas army wings.
After passing 23 years in an Israeli prison, Sinwar has turned in the principal politic leader replacing Ismail Haniyah, who is postulated to begun in the leader of the set of the organization.
His victory has not been a surprise because his long trajectory in the group, to certain emptiness in the power of the hard wing and to the incapacity of the major leader of the group, Mohamed Deif, considered almost as a legend to his fanatics.
With the choice of Sinwar, there have got blurred the lines of the politics that follows the group since, in 2007, wrested the power in the Gaza Strip from another politic Palestinian organization, Al Fatah. Considered more inflexible than the actual leader, Sinwar puts on the table several questions that can alter the zone, already instable.
On one hand, Sinwar always was known by his opposition against the Israel State, refusing to recognize his existence and proclaiming his destruction. During the last years, Hamas had relaxed his message of destruction of his powerful neighbor, possibly for exhaustion of the society model who only has taken the Palestinian people to the misery. The invocation, again, of Israel’s destruction -as a fled ahead that, by means of the blood of his own population that press to Israel and the international community- return to taker form. This can return to provoke a direct confrontation with Israel as the one that happened in 2014, which caused thousands of deaths and wounded, as well as important damages in already of for if precarious infrastructures of Gaza. Therefore makes afraid of an increase of the violence scale with Israel.
In addition, the link might reinforce with the economic and military godfather in the Gaza Strip, Iran, country that already in the past financed and proportionated technology and armament to Hamas, and now he could contribute to the local production of armament and the excavation of tunnels. It is not necessary to forget that the hundreds of missiles that in 2014 fell down on Israeli territory were of Iranian technology.
On the other hand, other question arises also from how will be the relations that he will have with Egypt which, from 2015, improved his relations producing a major opening of the frontiers in Gaza, that it his only direct link with the exterior. But, the Egyptian president, Al-Sisi, perceived to the group of Hamas as a branch of Muslim Brotherhood, removed from the power in Egypt and outlawed – and the relations initiated by Sinwar with the Islamic State auto denominated, they reinforce this distrust, being able to put in danger these relations. This might provoke the almost total isolation of the Gaza strip, which already lives through the Israeli blockade for land and sea, which would aggravate more the lack of basic products, as well as the deterioration of his infrastructures. Recently, there has been blocked Fatah’s frontier way, after the border was opened only for three consecutive days by humanitarian cases.

To the margin of the suppositions, which is clear that it goes to mean the arrival of Sinwar is that the Palestinians are going to see his resources – scanty – reversed, in the main, for the development and armament purchase, turning into his absolute priority. And, with what it concerns with another Palestinian group, Al Fatah, who governs in the autonomous region of West Bank, will deny to them any type of transfer or agreement with Israel, putting in danger the constitution of a possible government of unit, which remembered last January between both representatives of Hamas and Al Fatah, as well as delegates of other organizations as the Islamic Yihad, with that it was trying to join to the divided one to the Palestinian village.
We will see if finally this zone of Middle East, it returns to turn into one more point of conflict, provoking and displacing the instability to the rest of countries.