While paying the highest prices for gasoline this summer, Americans are
asking, "Why?" This is a good question. Do not expect the mainstream
media to provide a good answer. They are joined at the hip to the Clinton
administration's party line, so you have to look elsewhere for the truth.
One good place to look is nationalcenter.org,
the Internet site of the National Center for Policy Research.

On June 23, they drew a direct line between the Environmental Protection
Agency's regulations and the fuel gas price hike. In brief, the EPA requirement
that one-third of the nation's gasoline supply be reformulated gasoline
(RFG) for the supposed purpose of reducing air pollution is one of the
primary reasons why you are paying a lot more, but getting, may I add,
nothing in return. We all know you would pay almost anything to breathe
pure oxygen, but it's not going to happen. For one thing, the earth is
a great gaseous thing oozing and leaking what the EPA calls "pollutants"
into the air all the time. It does this from forests, swamps, oceans,
volcanoes, your front lawn, et cetera.

More specifically, however, a May 1999 report from the National Research
Council (NRC), an arm of the National Academy of Sciences and the National
Academy of Engineering, concluded that RFG would do little to reduce air
pollution. You can read the details at the NCPR web site. Suffice it to
say a panel of twelve presumably very smart scientists and engineers concluded
that oxygen additives have only a minimal impact on reducing smog. But
we know you will pay anything to clean up the air, won't you? You don't
really mind gas that costs more than $2 and rising, do you?

Clinton and Gore want you to believe it's those terrible price-gauging
oil companies that are really to blame. They are, as is always the case,
lying to you. The oil companies will tell you the price has something
to do with the continued rise in the cost of crude oil and that might
have something to do with the Clinton-Gore administration's request to
the OPEC nations to pump less. Supply and demand. Less drives up the price
of anything. Now, it is useful to understand that it costs a lot of time
and money to produce RFG.

The EPA knows this. The EPA doesn't care. The EPA's so-called science
isn't worth spit. What the EPA cares about is forcing up the cost of gas
to force Americans to drive less. This is why they also require insane,
unnecessary auto inspection systems that don't work and those highway
lanes only cars with two or more people can use.

This is yet another EPA plan comparable to their push for the use of
ethanol in gasoline to clean the air. The problem is that it requires
lots of energy to produce ethanol that comes first by growing lots of
corn, an energy intensive activity. In a summer where acres of corn are
withering as the result of droughts in various areas of the nation, it
doesn't take a genius to figure out this is a bad idea. Moreover, the
ethanol lobby is maintained by government subsidies, i.e., your tax dollars.
Add that to the tax dollars you pay every time you fill up.

The entire Green movement is utterly and insanely devoted to getting
Americans to stop using oil for any reason whatever. (I suspect that most
Americans and others have no idea that everything plastic begins as oil.)
In the 1990 edition of "The Population Explosion", a book by
Paul R. and Anne H. Ehrlich, the authors reflected the Green view of gasoline
saying, "The United States should start by gradually imposing a higher
gasoline tax-hiking it by one or two cents per month until gasoline costs
$2.50 to $3.00 per gallon, comparable to prices in Europe and Japan."
On the dust cover, Al Gore endorsed the book saying, "The time for
action is due, and past due. Erhlich has written the prescription."

Here's what Al Gore says about the automobile: "We now know that
their cumulative impact on the global environment is posing a mortal threat
to the security of every nation that is more deadly than that of any military
enemy we are ever again likely to confront." This is lunacy.

If people in the 1930's had read and taken seriously the views of Adolph
Hitler's screed, Mein Kampf, in which he wrote of the need to "eliminate"
the Jews of Germany and Europe, they might have avoided World War II because
he spelled it all out well before the first tank rolled into Poland. We
need to take Al Gore seriously when he talks about the need to "eliminate"
the internal combustion engine and cut back on the use of every form of
energy known to man other than oxen, mules, and horses. If you think Hitler
was a lunatic, than you had better give some thought to Gore's views.

We are not running out of petroleum. Every time we think we are, we discover
more. However, huge oil reserves in Alaska are, at this very moment, in
the process of being put off limits to any use by the same Clinton-Gore
conspiracy to insure that you will pay, not just $2 a gallon, but more
like $6 a gallon. That will make the OPEC nations very rich and make you
very poor.

Now, let me state clearly that I am for clean air. The air is cleaner
in many respects thanks to the Clean Air Act passed in 1970, but like
everything else in life, there are tradeoffs. At some point, one has to
ask how much it is worth in billions of dollars to protect against air
the EPA deems to be too polluted? Is the science behind such determinations
accurate? How much are we willing to pay to significantly upgrade or close
down utilities throughout the US that depend on cheap, efficient coal
use to provide the electricity this nation requires? Does it make sense
to eliminate dams providing hydroelectric energy because of some salmon
that hatcheries can provides in abundance? Do we really want to make it
so expensive to transport goods (most moves by truck) that the cost of
everything goes up? Do we really want to force people to use mass transit
and forego the use of automobiles? Do we really want to pay high prices
for gasoline? It's easy to say yes. It's harder to pay for draconian measures
to achieve this if you have plans to send your children to college, buy
a new car, paint your home, or to have anything in the bank when you retire.

Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, and founder
of The National Anxiety Center,
a clearinghouse for information on scare campaigns.