Amazon pushes hard against sales tax

Monday

Jan 31, 2011 at 12:01 AMJan 31, 2011 at 12:16 PM

SEATTLE - To persuade Amazon.com Inc. to build a distribution hub in Tennessee, state and local officials offered a package of economic incentives that included free land, job-training assistance and more than $12 million in property-tax breaks.

SEATTLE - To persuade Amazon.com Inc. to build a distribution hub in Tennessee, state and local officials offered a package of economic incentives that included free land, job-training assistance and more than $12 million in property-tax breaks.

It was a run-of-the-mill package for an out-of-state company promising to create 1,400 jobs at two new warehouses by the end of 2011.

But Amazon sought more from the Volunteer State. Amazon policy chief Fred Kiga made a case for why the Seattle-based company should not have to collect sales tax from Tennessee customers once the warehouses are up and running.

At stake was Amazon's ability to continue offering Tennessee customers everything from books to bikes without making them pay sales tax - a significant price advantage over the local brick-and-mortar stores.

Whether Amazon should be able to give customers a sales-tax break has been a hot-button issue since the early days of online shopping and is especially contentious now that states are struggling to close big budget holes after the Great Recession.

Under a 1992 Supreme Court ruling, a state cannot require Internet retailers to charge sales tax on its behalf unless they have a physical presence in that state. What constitutes a physical presence is more complex than you might believe.

Amazon so far has avoided collecting sales tax in six states where it operates distribution centers. The company argues that, because the facilities are separate legal entities, they do not give the e-tailer a physical presence.

"We are having discussions right now with the state on this," Kiga, a former head of Washington state's revenue department, told the Times Free Press in Chattanooga, Tenn., last month. "The distribution centers here are not retailers, but rather drop-shippers."

Officials of Tennessee's revenue and economic-development departments declined to comment, citing a long-standing policy of not divulging tax information about a particular business. Amazon, which rarely talks about behind-the-scenes business practices, did not answer questions about its sales-tax plan for Tennessee. The state's newly elected Republican governor, Bill Haslam, who once ran the e-commerce business of Saks Fifth Avenue, seemed to agree with Kiga.

While acknowledging that untaxed online sales are a growing problem for cash-strapped states, Haslam said tax collectors should not "interfere with our recruiting of Amazon to Tennessee. That's a huge priority for us," he told the Times Free Press.

Amazon charges sales tax in a handful of states where it does business: Kansas, Kentucky, New York, North Dakota and Washington. The six states where it distributes products but does not charge sales tax are Arizona, Indiana, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Texas and Virginia.

In the most audacious move yet by a state, Texas recently hit Amazon with a $269 million bill for four years of unpaid sales taxes. Amazon, which turned around and sued Texas, demanding to see the state's tax documents, says its warehouse near Dallas is an "affiliate, but not subsidiary, of the Amazon retailing entity."

Amazon also finds itself at odds with the National Retail Federation. The trade group argues that Internet-only retailers have an unfair price advantage over traditional stores that collect sales tax, and it wants Congress to do something about it.

Although calls for closing the sales-tax loophole are not new, the retail federation believes it's finally making some headway with Congress. E-commerce companies did well during the economic downturn, posing more of a threat to brick-and-mortar rivals.

Amazon's worldwide sales surged nearly 30 percent in 2008 to $19 billion and topped $24 billion in 2009, two of the worst years in recent memory for U.S. retailers. The company, which almost doubled its annual profit during the same two years, plans to report 2010 results Thursday.

"More sales are taking place online, but they're going untaxed," said Craig Shearman, vice president of government affairs for the retail federation.

Economist Bill Fox, who heads the University of Tennessee's Center for Business and Economic Research in Knoxville, estimates that states lose about $12billion a year from untaxed online sales.

What's more, state and local sales taxes add between 5 and 10 percent to a shopper's in-store purchases, so buying from an Internet-only merchant can offer significant savings.

"The local bookstore closes down, and the firm in Seattle keeps growing," Fox said. "If I can save 10 percent by buying something from Amazon, that's a strong incentive."

Never miss a story

Choose the plan that's right for you.
Digital access or digital and print delivery.