I support Castle and the BBC. Vast majority of people watching Wimbledon are not tennis fans and Castle's style is good for them.

Why should the BBC care about genuine tennis fans? In the UK we are a small group of people with no influence.

Totally agree with you, whatever we may think about Castle as a Com he is a great supporter of Andy as to the farce with Lloyd, some friend Lloyd is to look for money for a statement that actually gave nothing away, just that there were personal reasons why Lloyd wouldn't go for the LTA job. If he didn't like what Castle had said he could have had a quiet word with him.As to his commentating he doesn't bother me as much as some others, namely Cowen who always reminds me when he is in the studio that he like a chicken about to lay an egg! There are a few others that get under my skin as well.

I listened to Castle and Tim H commenting on the Gold Medal match. Their commentary was so biased in favour of Mr M, as to be funny. Impartiality went out of the window very rapidly. I will forgive Castle for anything after that. He might be a prat, but he is on Mr M's side.

I also think that Castle is fine. Most people watching the BBC's coverage won't be regular tennis fans - certainly the majority of the 10 million watching Andy's match the other day won't have been. Many will only have heard of Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Andy - I doubt many will have heard of the rest of the top 8 players, let alone those that are lower ranked. So it makes sense to employ someone that can explain the game and provide some information on the other players. After all the negativity about Andy in the media over the years, I don't think bias towards him now is a bad thing at all - I'm sure other host broadcasters would be biased towards their home players too.

I also think that Castle is fine. Most people watching the BBC's coverage won't be regular tennis fans - certainly the majority of the 10 million watching Andy's match the other day won't have been. Many will only have heard of Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Andy - I doubt many will have heard of the rest of the top 8 players, let alone those that are lower ranked. So it makes sense to employ someone that can explain the game and provide some information on the other players. After all the negativity about Andy in the media over the years, I don't think bias towards him now is a bad thing at all - I'm sure other host broadcasters would be biased towards their home players too.

It's a shame the information is usually incorrect and incredibly patronising about said players.

I signed it because of the Queens incident, that at the time, he should have been fired straight off from. Sharing that someone is having problems with their personal life, then going into detail about it on live TV and probably humiliating the person, followed by a cheap uppercut into the throat by saying because of that they are not fit for the role as CEO, is quite honestly, uncalled for, unprofessional and cruel. Also makes Castle look a real snob.