Economic models of land allocation may lead to expectations for farmer response that “surprisingly" do not materialize, if market prices fail to reflect the value of farmers' product. “Shadow prices" rather than market prices explain resource allocation better for farmers who attach significant non-market values to their own crops. I extend the theoretical model in Arslan and Taylor (2008) to explain why the land allocation of such farmers may not respond to market signals even if transaction costs are not binding. I estimate the proportion of land subsistence maize farmers allocate to traditional versus modern maize varieties using nationally representative rural household data from Mexico – the center of diversity of maize. I conclude that shadow prices explain land allocation better than market prices and discuss the importance of non-market values in understanding both farmers' supply response and on-farm conservation of traditional crops with non-market values.

Connect

Newsletteranmeldung

Updates from the Kiel Institute

Updates from the Kiel Institute

If you would like us to keep you informed about news or events, please register here.

We would like to address you personally, hence providing the following information would be helpful.

Ms.Mr.

Firstname

Name

Organization

Yes, I would like to be informed about news or events of the Kiel Institute and receive this information to the given email address. I can revoke this consent at any time by sending an email to E-Mail Address protected. Please enable Javascript.. By clicking the ‘Subscribe’ button, I consent to the processing of my data by the Kiel Institute for the stated purpose. I have read the privacy policy statement.

Confirm
(Required)

An Error occured while subscribing

Thank you for subscribing to our information service. Please check your email and confirm the subscription.