On Feb 16, 3:32 pm, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Feb 16, 1:04 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:>> > On 15 Feb., 23:58, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> > > So WMs statements are>> > > there is a line l such that d and l> > > are coFIS>> > Of course, for every n there is a line 1, 2, 3, ..., n that is coFIS> .> to the diagonal 1, 2, 3, ..., n.>> Nope. a line is either coFIS to d or it is not.>> It makes sense to say>> For every n there is a line, l(n) such that

increment my OOPs counter

> the nth FIS of l(n) is the nth FIS of d .> But this does not make l(n) coFIS to d.>> > > And there is not more than every n.>> > > there is no line l such that d and l> > > are coFIS> > That would only be true if there was an n larger than every n>> ?? The statement is yours. Are you now withdrawing it.