If there are any questions about the structure stated above, they will be asked an answered, as acceptance means that Con accepts the framer's intentions of the above structure if he does not ask questions about it.

Rules:No SemanticsBurden of proof is split and even.A forfeit for whatever reason will count as an automatic loss.

If either side does not follow this structure or these rules, it is an automatic loss to this debate.

Definitions go in constructive speeches, not in the intro. Acceptance does not entitle definitions. You CANNOT assume that and then accept your own definition that limits this debate as far as you did. If you want to debate this, we are dropping your definition. As I said: "If there are any questions about the structure stated above, they will be asked an answered, as acceptance means that Con accepts the framer's intentions of the above structure if he does not ask questions about it." You should have waited.

You kind of accepted before I could tell you this. But no, we are not debating this specifically as a government regulated institution. If you don't want to debate, I guess we can call it a draw or something.