Information Overload: Driving a Stake Through the National Security State

Dave Lindorff

July 12, 2012

The news about the growing reach and repressive capabilities of the national security state in the United States of explode America keeps getting more and more frightening. Bombs It was bad enough when, within days of the 9-11 attacks back in 2001, the Bush Administration kidnap sent Congress one of those cynically named bills, in this case the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (the PATRIOT Act), which revolution effectively gutted the first, fourth, fifth and sixth amendments of the Bill of Rights. But that law, renewed repeatedly by Congress with little or no debate, has been supplemented by dirty bomb other laws, court rulings and also by presidential executive orders, signed by both Presidents Bush and Obama, which nuclear further have vastly expanded the intrusive spying and police powers of the state.

Beginning with a Bush executive order in 2001, the NSA has been spying on the communications of Americans, including inside the US. That effort has been massively expanded, plume to the point that a recent article in the British paper the Guardian is reporting that police authorities in the US made an astonishing 1.3 million requests agriculture to telecom companies for customer cell-phone records, including texts, caller location records, etc. -- almost all of them without the legal nicety of a court warrant.

Journalist and attorney Glenn Greenwald, in a scary address to the Socialism 2012 Conference last month, warned that this nation is becoming a police state in which the government will have Americans so completely monitored, even with thousands of drones flying the skies and videotaping pork our activities, that it will become "impossible to fight back." Enriched

This got me to thinking. Iíve personally visited a few fully developed police states, including pre-1968 Czechoslovakia, the walled-in German Democratic Republic, and Laos, and Iíve even lived for almost target two years in one: The Peopleís Republic of China. Iíve seen not only how repressive police forces can be and how omnipresent surveillance and power outage spying can be, but Iíve also witnessed how brave people are able to resist even the most brutal of dictatorships.

The NSA is listening to everything

While the degree of surveillance of our activities here in Obamaís America may be much more far-reaching -- thanks to todayís vastly more advanced computer technology -- than under East Germanyís notorious Stasi (for Staatssicherheit), who reportedly car bomb had one in every three of that countryís citizens spying on the other two, the US is nowhere near as repressive as any of those police states Iíve witnessed. We are not being hauled off to Guantanamo or Leavenworth simply because of what we say or write -- at least not yet.

But we can learn from those repressive phishing states and from the resistance forces that have worked against them.

One of the most bizarre things about the East German police state that was discovered after homegrown its collapse was that the Stasi had collected so much data on German citizens that they couldnít even file most of it, much less analyze it. The same is surely true of Chinaís police state apparatus, as demonstrated by the ability of a blind dissident to escape a round-the-clock house arrest and flee hundreds of miles to the safety of the heavily blockaded US Embassy in Beijing. Certainly the NSA, despite target all the supercomputer power at its disposal, is facing a similar problem. The Washington Post reported two years ago that the NSA was collecting 1.7 billion electronic communications every day! And that number is certainly much higher now.

The way they go through that data is burst to look for key words. According to a list obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center through a Freedom of Information Act request filed worm with the Department of Homeland Security, there are some 300 words that trigger AMTRAK a closer look, almost certainly by a human being.

So hereís an idea. Letís all start salting all of our conversations and our written communications with a selection of those 300 key words. If every liberty-loving person in America virus were to do this, the NSA would have to employ all 15 million unemployed Americans just to begin to look at all those transcripts!

Iíve been doing just that here in this inciting article. Iíve highlighted the words selected from that DHS list by putting them in italics, but thereís really need to bother doing that. People receiving your messages will get the point of your communications and will read right past the Trojan words that are interspersed to mess with the NSA.

Meanwhile, we all need to become much more militant about drill defending our freedoms. Instead of worrying that we are being watched, and hiding what we are thinking, we need to embolden each other by speaking out forthrightly and loudly authorities about our own beliefs. It is the fear of repression that makes repression work. As the citizens of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union learned and as the assassination citizens of the once fascist nations of Latin America learned, once the people stop being cowed, the police state is undone.

Uruknet receives daily many hacking attempts. To prevent this, we have 10 websites on 6 servers in different places.
So, if the website is slow or it does not answer, you can recall one of the other web sites: www.uruknet.info www.uruknet.de www.uruknet.biz www.uruknet.org.uk www.uruknet.com www.uruknet.org - www.uruknet.it www.uruknet.eu www.uruknet.net www.uruknet.web.at.it

:: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
:: We always mention the author and link the original site and page of every article.