Brand new elite whistleblower smashes global warming science

Awarded climate medal by Obama—now he finds enormous fraud and exposes it

Memo to President Trump and Steve Bannon: Here it is. Set the table, put the napkins in your lap and feast on this revelation.

by Jon Rappoport

February 6, 2017

A highly respected, medal-winning climate scientist just wound up and threw a giant monkey wrench into global warming science.

His name? John Bates. His target? A recent fraudulent study that claimed the uncomfortable “pause” in warming was really no pause at all. That study, pretending warming had never stopped, was timed to help negotiating nations at the Climate Summit in Paris. It was timed to help them enact draconian economic measures to reduce warming.

But, Bates reveals, that study was cooked on several counts. It was such a mess no self-respecting scientist would sign on to it. However, scientists did sign on to it. And a prestigious journal, Science, published it. Apparently, the brains at Science were on vacation. Or they were determined to play ball and assist the Globalist plan to drastically reduce CO2-producing energy production in nations across the globe, thus escalating poverty, in order to “save us” all from frying.

“The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.”

“A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed [fraudulent] report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.”

“The [fraudulent] report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.”

“But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.”

“His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the [fraudulent] Pausebuster paper.”

“His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trump’s determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessor’s ‘green’ policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal – so triggering an intense political row.”

“In an exclusive interview, Dr Bates accused the lead author of the paper, Thomas Karl, who was until last year director of the NOAA section that produces climate data – the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) – of ‘insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximised warming and minimised documentation…in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy’.”

“Both datasets [used in the fraudulent study] were flawed. This newspaper has learnt that NOAA has now decided that the sea dataset will have to be replaced and substantially revised just 18 months after it was issued, because it used unreliable methods which overstated the speed of warming. The revised data will show both lower temperatures and a slower rate in the recent warming trend.”

“The land temperature dataset used by the study was afflicted by devastating bugs in its software that rendered its findings ‘unstable’.”

“The paper [fraudulent study] relied on a preliminary, ‘alpha’ version of the data which was never approved or verified.”

“None of the data on which the paper was based was properly ‘archived’ – a mandatory requirement meant to ensure that raw data and the software used to process it is accessible to other scientists, so they can verify NOAA results.”

“Dr Bates retired from NOAA at the end of last year after a 40-year career in meteorology and climate science. As recently as 2014, the Obama administration awarded him a special gold medal for his work in setting new, supposedly binding standards ‘to produce and preserve climate data records’.”

“Yet when it came to the paper timed to influence the Paris conference, Dr Bates said, these standards were flagrantly ignored.”

“The [fraudulent] paper was published in June 2015 by the journal Science. Entitled ‘Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus’, the document said the widely reported [warming] ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ was a myth.”

“But Dr Bates said this increase in temperatures was achieved by dubious means. Its key error was an upwards ‘adjustment’ of readings from fixed and floating buoys, which are generally reliable, to bring them into line with readings from a much more doubtful source – water taken in by ships. This, Dr Bates explained, has long been known to be questionable: ships are themselves sources of heat, readings will vary from ship to ship, and the depth of water intake will vary according to how heavily a ship is laden – so affecting temperature readings.”

“Dr Bates said: ‘They had good data from buoys. And they threw it out and “corrected” it by using the bad data from ships. You never change good data to agree with bad, but that’s what they did – so as to make it look as if the sea was warmer’.”

“Moreover, the…software [used in the fraudulent study] was afflicted by serious bugs. They caused it to become so ‘unstable’ that every time the raw temperature readings were run through the computer, it gave different results.”

“Dr Bates revealed that the failure to archive and make available fully documented data not only violated NOAA rules, but also those set down by Science. Before he retired last year, he continued to raise the issue internally. Then came the final bombshell. Dr Bates said: ‘I learned that the computer used to process the software had suffered a complete failure’.”

“The reason for the failure is unknown, but it means the [fraudulent] Pausebuster paper can never be replicated or verified by other scientists.”

Get it? Fraud all the way along the line. And a cover-up, to make an examination of the fraud-details impossible.

The perfect worst-case scenario.

Can we now, at last, have a few criminal indictments?

Even a prosecuting attorney fresh out of law school, wet behind the ears, with zero courtroom experience, would be able to secure a proper verdict.

Guilty on all counts.

Guilty of fraud, and aiding and abetting a far-reaching scheme to reduce energy production in America (and other nations), on the premise that warming is rising and must be stopped.

“Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, imagine this. The powers-that-be want to cut the production of energy in this country. Anyone can see the result of such a plan. We all become strapped. We all become poorer. But we’re told this is necessary to save us from the destruction of life on Earth. We’re told we have to go along with the plan, because producing energy releases carbon dioxide, which in turn keeps raising the temperature of the planet. Recently, a key scientific study was published, and this study bolsters the whole idea that global warming is on the rise. But a key expert insider will show that this study was false and a fraud and a lie, and the people who wrote it are guilty of deceiving you and me and everyone. Find these people guilty, once and for all, and send them to prison, where they belong…”

I could try this case in court. You could try this case in court. Three guys in a bar could try this case. And win.

Are you ready, Mr. Trump? Send out the hounds from the Department of Justice and put these liars under arrest.

And let’s see their trial in open court, every minute of it, on camera, on television, online.

Let’s see it in New York and Chicago and Los Angeles and Toronto and London and Paris and Rome and Kabul and Tehran and Sydney and Tokyo and Rio and Durban and Nuuk and Tierra del Fuego…

At long last, put official science and its enablers in the dock.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

For some of us it is not knew that Circus Climate Change is part of action plan Agenda 21/2030.
It proved to be very hard to convince people that it is all a hoax and I believe Mr. LaRousse who stated that climate change is no Science, it is a depopulation program.

And here we are, finally scientists with decent brains, the right responsibil attitude are opening up to inform the people what is the truth.

IMO, the action points in your article I fully agree with have to be carried out by Mr. Donald J. Trump without delay because this “climate change circus” is damaging people, the earth and in the line of the new USA president: it damages the global economy horrendously.

Here in Canada, one will pay carbon tax on plants bought from a greenhouse…I looked at the numbers on how much it will cost each and ever household on average in Canada, and it flutuates somewhere around $4000 a year. Depending on who is reprting. That is a lot of money for someone to steal from me.

There is NO greenhouse gas, CO2 is a benign, trailing artifact. One cannot define a massive, dynamic, chaotic system with a single parameter, linear, anecdotal hypothesis or correct a false hypothesis with a coefficient. The Alarmist/Luke Warmist debate is rigged and fake.

President Obama has said that refining Gasoline further to remove more of the impurities would Eliminate 50 Billion Dollars a year in Healthcare Costs , probably Billions more . Time to Prosecut the American Medical Association for the Genocide of the American People and the Destruction of the Earth . MURDER HEALTH CARE SYSTEM KILLING MY FAMILY .

Thank you for the succinct facts of this case of lying. I’ll tell it to people like I have the other cases of fraudulent global warming data but I predict I’ll have almost no luck in persuading anyone to doubt global warming. It looks blatantly simple, a child could understand the problem with data from ships vs. fixed buoys or moving thermometers around but adults just stare and keep believing the TV guy.

Trump should use this opportunity to out the facts and expose the lies but I’m still not sure it will persuade many people. A doctor once told me that my ability to see things as they are was very rare. I don’t understand how you lie to yourself as much as is necessary to keep up with all our current lies but thank goodness I see and accept truth. Wish there were more of us.

A comment on buoys: NOAA used a fixed buoyed T and pH measurement system for around 80 years. Sondes descended on cables from buoys and recorded measurements at different depths as they ascended. Measurements were transmitted to satellites at the surface. The sondes recorded a fluctuation in pH of around 1.0, and no trend toward acidification, and no warming trend. PhD candidate Mike Wallace found that NOAA Pacific Marine Lab director Chris Sabine had destroyed 80 years of sonde data and replaced it with computer-generated data that showed declining pH and a warming trend – an incident that got very nasty, with Sabine refusing to release data and threatening to destroy Wallace’s career.
QED – political corruption supercedes thermometers and data collection techniques. The environment of the planet isn’t in the loop in the UN’s environmental program

It’s a Rothschild banker’s scam. The UN published the fact that it’s goal is global British race and culture in the Des Moines, Iowa news in 1987. The “developing nations” psyop is a Hegelian dialectic; it’s an Aglo-American racist plan to enact the policies in Cecil Rhodes’ last will.

Wednesday, September 1, 2010
club of Rome – the data doesn’t matter – all heretics will be punished – do you believe?
“Remember that you are an Englishman, and have consequently won first prize in the lottery of life.”
“Wherever you turn your eye—except in science—an Oxford man is at the top of the tree.” –Cecil Rhodes

Club of Rome’s version of government, climate-change and depopulation agenda quotes

“The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.”–Prof. Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research

Global Average Temperature…what a joke! The whole gathering process is a joke.

If one take a closer look at the surface stations in the United States. Much of this infrastructure is old and jury rigged to modern standards. Surface stations have been monitored for well over a hundred years, in some places. And some surface stations have been around that long, if not in other cases much longer.

It is one of the least looked at infrastructures in the US. Many of these temperature and data surface stations were built decades and decades ago. Were once an open field expose the surface station to the elements. Now many of these are in the middle of subdivision. Or they are now on black top tarmac parking lots or next to a heat source like exterior restaurant kitchen fans, or heat exhaust from running vehicles in parking lots. Home owners have moved them, planted around them to hide them; or they are sheltered from the effects. Some can be found on top of a building in a shopping mall…a hot place on a summer afternoon.

Sometimes the surface station are attached to newly erected buildings, or right next to these definite heat sources. Proper temperatures can not be gained in this…this gathered information cannot be considered facts.

When one looks at the paucity of surface stations closer to the poles, or wilderness, they are few and far between, when compared to the density of surface stations in the continental United States and Europe. When one looks closer, we find a great density of surface stations in villages and towns. Numerous surface stations are found within major cities, airports…

Cities, towns and villages are micro-climates compared to out of town regions.
I personally have found an average 2 degree C difference in town temperature and out of town temperature.

When testing these sites for their accuracy of gathered data. We find that, within the United States, that surface stations on average, are greater than 2 degrees C in error. Some even range as large as 5 degrees C in error. Add this to the paucity of surface stations over the whole planet, rather than a concentration in specific regions, countries and there is enough room to fly a space shuttle through the gaping hole in that corrupted global data.

When average world mean temperature for instance is calculated, an average or mean it taken from all reporting surface stations. If there is a lop-sided gathering from one warmer area compared to paucity of surface station in colder areas, there will be discrepancies. And imbalanced mean.
Adding to this, with newer off planet temperature sensor gathering from satellites, the accuracy of these results are even more untrustworthy. With temperature prediction according to computer models, we add another layer of error.

In a recent study of hospital thermometers…(I know, but a mercury thermometer is still a mercury thermometer)

“Both laboratory and clinical studies show that there is [no significant difference in the average accuracy of the two types of thermometers], however there is a greater fluctuation of readings of temperature when using electronic thermometers. In clinical studies between 9 and 23% of repeated measurements using an electronic thermometer differ by 0.5°C or more whilst the corresponding range for mercury thermometers is 0.6%. It is also shown that when making clinical measurements with mercury thermometers there is no clinical advantage in using a measurement time longer than 3 minutes.” -PubMed

Proper temperature gathering devices are very expensive; mercury thermometers are unreliable below -39 degrees C, but still cheap. Alcohol in thermometers evaporates, and polymerize after a time.
Electronic devices are susceptible to surrounding EMF corruption and electrically disturbances; they rely on battery or solar power. And as they age they drift to an errored higher or lower temperature

Really great informative comment. I think you may have missed the punchline, though (LOL); the person in charge of surface stations, GISS Director Gavin Schmidt, isn’t a climate scientist – he’s a computer modeler.

This was their dirty plan to ban people from owning a car and to start pushing for Robot self driving electric cars And to crush the coal industry to push the solar panel industry in which the Elites had invested in.

The community of geoethicists from the source has lot of experiences with horrible climate changes frauds as well as with real scientific problems of the actual extraordinary period in the behaviour of purely natural forces. Oliver K. Manuel has indicated very objective testimonies at some of the previous blogs supported also by my comments. From such a point of view the new elite whistle blower story may seem to be of quite marginal importance. BUT in fact Jon is to to be congratulated for publishing this case of the probably first confession of a scientist who appeared as unable to continue in his life with such a heavy moral burden. There is no need to ask President Trump or Steve Bannon what to do, all steps of the previous Administration incl. manoeuvres at COP 21 in Paris have been blocked immediately. The correct question should be: How long will other collapsed scientists continue in delaying an analogous confession? In my opinion an unavoidable high intensity Science-quake is to be expected.

Vaclav is right. Jon played, and will hopefully continue to play, a crucial role in deciphering and ending the enslavement of humanity with more than seven decades of false science.

Blackeyes correctly identified this as part of UN’s Agenda 21/2030. The root of the problem was hidden from the public with a news blackout of events in SE Asia after Hiroshima & Nagasaki were destroyed on 6 & 9 AUG 1945. Stalin’s USSR troops:

1. Immediately invaded Korea and Manchuria

2. Captured Janan’s atomic bomb plant at Konan, Korea

3. Shot down a US B-29 bomber over Konan, holding the crew for negotiations in Sept 1945

4. Gave Stalin sole possession of the world’s remaining inventory of atomic bombs, and

5. A winning argument* for world leaders to save themselves and the world from nuclear annihilation by:
_ a.) Uniting nations and national Academies of Sciences under the UN on 24 OCT 1945
_ b.) Using Dr. Carl von Weizsacker’s flawed definition of “nuclear binding energy” to hide the source of energy in atomic bombs from the public – NEUTRON REPULSION
_ c.) Giving phoney Nobel or Crafoord Prizes to scientists/politicians who tricked the public with supposedly scientific evidence of:
_ c1) Yukawa’s Standard Nuclear Model
_ c2) Fowler’s Model of Element Synthesis
_ c3) Wasserburg’s Model of the Solar System Formation
_ c4) Gore/UN IPCC’s Model of CO2-induced global warming

* Stalin’s winning argument for uniting nations and National Acadenies of Sciences: “Better Red Than Dead.

A worldwide news blackout of Asian events in the closing days of WWII kept all of us from knowing that frightened world leaders formed the UN because Stalin had captured the world’s remaining inventory of atomic bombs from Japan at Konan, Korea in AUG 1945, soon after allied atomic bombs destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 & 9 AUG 1945:

Stalin had a convincing reason for frightened world leaders to agree to unite nations and national academies of sciences in order to hide the source of energy in atomic bombs on 24 OCT 1945 – “Better Red Than Dead.”

To save themselves and the world from possible world-wide nuclear annihilation, world leaders united nations and national academies of sciences into a world-wide network that ruled the world by deceit with Scandavian National Academies of Sciences giving Nobel and/or Crafoord Prizes for “97% consensus science.”

The 1983 Nobel Prize in Physics and the 1986 Crafoord Prize in Geological Sciences are recent examples of false science that set the stage for 2007 Nobel Prizes for the UN’s IPCC and Al Gore for fake scientific evidence global warming is induced by CO2 from industrialized western nations.

The late Professor Paul Kazuo Kuroda was the first nuclear scientist to examine the ruins of Hiroshima in AUG 1945. Kuroda risked the rest of his life trying to prevent Stalin from using the UN and the UNAS (United National Academies of Sciences) from using science to deceive and control humanity:

How Edmund de Rothschild Managed to Let 179 Governments Pay Him for Grasping Up to 30% of the Earth

Woe to him that … establisheth a city by iniquity!… that the people shall labor in the very fire, and the people shall weary themselves for very vanity (Habakkuk 2:12-13)

Summary: After Edmund de Rothschild’s statement, without basis, at the 4th World Wilderness Congress in 1987, that CO2 is the cause of a non-existent global warming – and that combating it needs money (our money), he founded the World Conservation Bank for this reason. In 1991 its name was changed to The Global Environment Facility (GEF). The purpose of this facility is to lend money to the poorest countries, printed by the IMF out of thin air, and with the guarantee of our governments.http://www.abeldanger.net/2011/07/edmund-de-rothschild-world-wilderness.html

The left can never win on facts or ever deal with a citizenry which is awake and has the ability to question and think. The left must always use deception, selective outrage and manipulation of data in order to advance its illogical and twisted agenda.

The left does not care if its agenda is right or if they are helping the country. Their Marxist agenda is their religion and they consider it their duty to blindly follow this agenda, up and over a cliff if necessary.

Some very smart people who would classify themselves as liberals no longer care about this country. As long as they can exist safely within their bubble of moral relativism, it is the only thing that matters to them. They believe anybody who disagrees with their view or agenda must be eventually eliminated. You can not argue or debate a liberal anymore.

These zombies are living in an inverse reality preparing their children for a world which never existed and never will. Trump needs to push his agenda hard and not compromise with these people.

Harry Reid changed the rules in order to never compromise again. The country is at stake and we need to ignore the leftist children and their temper tantrums.

Obama got everything he wanted and spent 10 trillion dollars destroying every fabric of American society. It is time to pick up the pieces of carnage this Marxist maniac ideologue and his arrogant sycophants have left behind.

” You cannot argue or debate a liberal any more” suggests that you have an open and reasonable mind. Debate entails listening and asking questions. There is a sense that we might learn something, might even ask a question. But I don’t see any indication that John has any questions. It follows that debate would be hard to come by. Argue perhaps. It’s the lack of questions that is troublesome these days. No one really cares what you think. Dialogue is what happens in these one sided monologs under the heading “comment”. Well, this was mine. We all agree that the other is beyond just wrong, they are beyond reason, beyond words. When Trump gets dumped as he is sure to do, his supporters are not going away. […]

How does endless debt and adding ten trillion dollars to a national debt in the last eight years help the citizens of this country ? How do we deal with another 200 trillion dollars in unfunded liabilities?

Why do most liberals look at people and scientists who disagree with them on man made climate change like they are crazy?

Why is the common core education curriculum being forced upon individual states and the children in these states by the federal government ?

Why is the education system loaded with professors that lean almost entirely Marxist left and who refuse to teach but only indoctrinate? Part of being tolerant and inclusive?

How did we sit by and let 90,000 plus Christians get killed in the year 2016 and do nothing about it?

Why do we consider legal abortions at nine months when technology now clearly shows us there is a human heartbeat within 7-10 days?

Why do we allow open borders and illegal immigration in this country?

Why do we allow people into this country who believe in and practice sharia law, is that law compatible with the US Constitution?

Why do liberal activist judges refuse to make their decisions according to the US Constitution?

Why isn’t food clearly labeled with all its ingredients and where it is made from largely disregarded on a majority of products US consumers buy online and off-line?

Why do banks give people 200 dollars to people to open a checking account but only give pennies in interest to a person with thousands of dollars in savings accounts and who were responsible and saved their whole life?

How does the banking system survive by giving people loans with hardly any down payment on a house today?

What became of responsibility, logic, individualism, critical thinking, integrity, freedom of speech and accountability?

Why do people buy “smart devices” willfully give up their privacy and blindly agree to become surveilled by a tyranny?

How does 48 million Americans on food stamps equal a sustainable economy?

How does the lowest worker participation rate in over 40 result in prosperity ?

How does a 15 dollar an hour minimum wage sustain jobs in the industries liberals wish to impose this wage upon?

Who pays for free college tuition? Tell me exactly how this works?

How does one high school in upstate NY which operates under 45 different languages and a graduation rate of 14 percent continue to exist ?

How does the state of California survive with a bankrupted hospital system and 400 billion dollars of debt?

How does the city of NY expect to remain viable by spending 400,000 dollars a day housing homeless people in HOTELS that cost between 120- 600 dollars a day per family?

How do we let illegal aliens who have committed multiple felonies and have been deported numerous times back into this country ?

Are sharia courts coming to the USA?

Why do a huge amount of American college campuses shut down Conservative speakers time and time again?

Why do we shut down American coal mines and watch other coal mines open up at lightning speed in South America, Africa and southeast Asia?

Why do we ignore climate data that doesn’t fit the new world order liberal globalist agenda ?

Why is the pollution of the Pacific ocean and the Fukushima disaster largely ignored by people who care about the environment?

Why aren’t US power grids protected from an EMP occurrence or terror attack?

Why is calling someone a homophobe, xenophobe, or racist equivocate to debating somebody?

Why isn’t health insurance affordable, why do we not allow competiton across state lines?

Why do alotta liberals consider voter identification some kind of crazy right wing conspiracy to disenfranchise poor people ?

Why don’t politicians/public servants have term limits?

Why can’t the solar and wind industry survive without government subsidies?

What is good about endless EPA regulations based on junk science and manipulated data ?

Why were polls saying Hillary Clinton was going to win this election in a major landslide?

Why was the terror state in Iran given 150 billion dollars?

Why were Conservatives targeted by the IRS for simply being Conservative?

Why was Benghazi blamed on some video?

What kind of “deal” involves taking into the USA 1600 illegal aliens who are currently sitting in Australian prisons ?

Why does the mainstream media feed us lie after lie promoting false narratives/leftist propaganda in order to promote globalism? Why are most “journalists” in the mainstream media leftists?

Why do 75 percent of black children grow up without a father in their household?

Why do we look at Chicago, a gun free zone and see all these killings every day?

Why are illegal drugs allowed to flow freely over our southern border each and every day?

Why is the majority of the entertainment industry immersed in a culture of death and left wing propaganda?

Why did we side with the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt?

Why is the Middle East in chaos and turmoil ?

Why is China now going to dictate what Americans can do on the internet?

Why was ISIS allowed to grow out of control?

Why is the convicted felon George Soros allowed to operate unfettered in the US? Why hasn’t he been arrested for sedition?

How do we vet people from countries who do not even have a government in place?

Why do we accept a health care system where doctors now spend more than half their days staring at a computer screen so the federal government can track every citizen’s health records?

I guess it is all the Russians fault, thank God those liberal politicians in California are now introducing a bill about the so-called Russian hacking of our presidential election. This so called Russian hacking will now possibly become a college course for our young children to “learn” from.

People are sick and tired of illogic and policies made by liberal “do gooders” who live in their own bubble world devoid of reality. Their only answer is to tax, tax, tax the middle class into obsolescence and shut down free speech. Most rational people are sick of it and Trump is sick of it. We are fed up with a democrat party which has been hijacked by a fringe bunch of Marxists. I imagine Trump will either stem the tide of liberalism or this country will soon be like Obama’s model country: Venezuela, where zoo animals are now eaten and inflation is out of control. But there is hope for the planet, a tax on air conditioning in the airports in Venezuela is in place. Now that is what I call “progressive!”

I wonder why my computer screen starts going crazy when I express my right to free speech, does this happen to liberals when they type and express their opinions? I guess Conservatives are just paranoid…

Did you know weather is played on the stock market…it’s quite a game. Mr Soros has invested heavily into such things…and will continue too, until he gets his way.

There is an interesting relationship between natural gas prices/volumes and the geoengineering of winter.
This marvelous super white snow, these little pellets quite similar in shape to styrofoam, they create to reduce albedo. I find manufactured winter a strange thing.
Took me a relatively long period of time to realize winter, spring, summer are not seasons, but markets.
If there is no snow and cold how can you sell snowmobiles, snow shovels, winter coats and boots.
Now you have to understand I am talking about weather as compared to climate. They are totally different.

No surprise re. NOAA at all. NOAA came into existence as the Office of Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries (or the U.S. Fish Commission for short). They were created by the treasonous Trojan horse known as the Smithsonian Institution in 1871 as the first federal agency to concern itself with conservation of natural resources and a big part of their justification for being was the purported depletion of food fishes along the sea coasts and in our lakes and rivers. This organization was thus created with the mandate to correct any such depletion if it existed… The irony with this mandate of theirs is that it was little over TWO DECADES before this agency was outed as a total F-R-A-U-D! Whereas their mandate was to PROTECT the environment and ensure that food fish populations increased, instead, the U.S. Fish Commission was caught conspiring against the American people in CAUSING A DEPLETION of food fish species along our coasts! In 1892 (see Lapham Bill, http://truthbetold.strangled.net/events.php?page=3#id2395), Eastern seaboard states like Maine and Massachusetts were fighting against the federal government (the U.S. Fish Commission) to maintain control of their coastal fisheries by continuing — as they always had — to regulate Menhaden and Mackerel fishing in their own coastal waters. The U.S. Fish Commission wanted to take that control from them and, for example, allow the Menhaden fishing industry to operate without regulation to scoop up every Menhaden fish that they could catch using huge purse seine nets which could catch thousands of fish at a time… So, what was the crime in that, you ask? The crime was that the federal government knew full well that the Menhaden occupied a most crucial link at the base of the coastal marine ecosystem. They ate only plankton and various other coastal fish species MOSTLY ONLY ATE THEM. Get it? Today, after well over a century of continued slaughter, Menhaden populations are just a shadow of what they once were. Whereas Captain John Smith wrote in 1608 that Menhaden schools were so thick that his crew was forced to catch them using frying pans, today, even modest sized schools of Menhaden are rarely ever seen. And populations of coastal food fish species like Striped Bass, Weakfish and Blue Fish are likewise almost just a memory; one for which You and I are being set up to take the blame all because of our “carbon footprints”. Want the full scoop? Please check out my paper, “Two Coastal Marine Disasters and the Fingerprint of Malthus” (see http://truthbetold.strangled.net/articles/tcmdatfom.html). There was way more to the BP oil spill disaster of 2010 than met the eye. — the Postman (truthbetold.strangled.net)

Just another low-level “insider” claiming participation at levels akin to wishful thinking. Great fodder for the highly funded corporate disinfo crowd, blah, blah, blah. In the days of fake media, it seems like nobody manages to catch on. If I remember correctly the Daily Mail has the nice looking woman on the second page – at least that would be truth, unless the picture is photoshop art. You might check out this discussion… due diligence, or something like that.http://icarus-maynooth.blogspot.com/2017/02/on-mail-on-sunday-article-on-karl-et-al.html

This whole Global Warming climate ruse has been proven false so many times that I’m shocked we’re STILL limping through these arguments. How many times must we prove them wrong–and deceitful–before this ludicrous scam goes away?

Ah I see you have’nt had any children…the kiddies sometimes have to be told a number of times to not touch the stove. “It’s hot!..touche pas, mon petit choe”…

Reaffiming their need to listen in order to learn, along with proper safe places for them to learn this, puppies and kittens to ease the transition to a higher state of counsciousness and understanding of how the world works. Gaining for them a modicum of common sense, which is the fuel that is siphoned off them to run their cell phones, I’ve learned recently.

Besides I love watching the melt-downs. And what bout the poor polar bears…have you thought of that…

Reblogged this on The Mystical Raven and commented:
The true cause behind any climate change that has taken place in the last 50 years is not a carbon footprint. Changes in climate are being caused by weather manipulation (i.e. H.A.A.R.P., chem-trails and the weaponization of weather) by our government and the governments of other major countries around the world. This has been taking place since WWII and possibly before. Research it and be prepared to be surprised.

Chemtrails exist but they can’t cause that which doesn’t exist–namely, global warming. As for weather manipulation, there’s every reason to believe that it is a pseudo conspiracy intended to hide the true motivation behind chemtrails. This works by diminishing the real significance of chemtrails. “We’re manipulating weather” sounds a whole lot less scary than “we’re raining poisons down over population centers in order to slowly but negatively impact the public’s health”. As a result, you can’t easily propagate concern over the matter. Simply put, weather modification or manipulation just doesn’t sound that threatening to the average person. Incidentally, this “cloaking of motivation” trick is discussed in some detail in my paper, “Two Coastal Marine Disasters and the Fingerprint of Malthus” (see http://truthbetold.strangled.net/articles/tcmdatfom.html), albeit, regarding other conspiracies. When the global warming fraud was foisted on everyone by the Malthusian elite, it was expected that laypersons would be totally incapable of confirming or denying its existence (thus creating a reliance on compromised scientific authorities) and this is why all major conspiracies exist just beyond our ability to confirm them. However, what the elite hadn’t planned on was the simple fact that anyone with little more than an inquisitive mind and an internet connection can confirm or deny for themselves the truth behind such controversial matters as global warming. It doesn’t require an advanced degree in physics, chemistry or anything else. All that’s required is some understanding of the scientific method as applied to… history. If a person can form an historical hypothesis and create an historical timeline or chronology to develop it (which I’ve already done), that person can find the truth about ANY modern conspiracy. That’s because All major, real conspiracies take place in the same historical context and therefore, none of them are immune to historical inquiry. Read the above referenced paper to see exactly what I mean. — the Postman (truthbetold.strangled.net)

Find the Book “How to Lie with Statistics” and learn how to take a small truth and make a BIG Lie from it for your own profit! Truth = we are coming out of an Ice Age, Truth = the Ice Caps will melt, Lie = the Oceans will rise as a direct result! Proof = take two large tubs (don’t have to be equal as you will see). Fill them both up with water. In one tub float some large blocks of ice (Ice Caps). Now mark the water level of both tubs. The tub without the Ice is called a “control” used to verify any unexpected variables like evaporation or other unforeseen variables. Result = when the Ice melts do you expect the water level to 1. go above the mark? 2. stay at the mark? 3. go below the mark? (Answer a) Before I give you the answer consider this variation on this proof. Do exactly the same steps but place each tub on a Physicians scale (no standby mode). Instead of ice blocks fill a balloon with water and seal it. Weigh the balloon! (lets say it weighed one pound). Freeze the balloon of water. Weigh it again, what will it weigh? (Answer b) (answer at the end) place the balloon in one of the tubs. How much water will the balloon of ice DISPLACE? (Answer c) The balloon if ice will float. when the balloon of ice melts it will sink. How much water will the balloon of WATER (melted ice) DISPLACE? (Answer d) will the water level 1. move above the mark? 2. stay at the mark? 3. move below the mark? (Answer e)

Answers:
(a) stay at the mark = no change!
(b) it will weigh the same (one pound in this example)
(c) it will weigh the same (one pound in this example)
(d) it will weigh the same (one pound in this example)
(e) stay at the mark = no change!

Study Archimedes (320 BC) for more insight on the LAWS of displacement.
All of the tonnage of the “Ice Caps” are already displacing all of the Oceans that they will ever DISPLACE for ALL of eternity! The melting of all Ice Caps will never have ANY effect on the levels of Oceans anywhere in the world! Ocean heights are determined by the Sun, Moon, and Winds!

Before you segway to the MANY other FALSE narratives, first consider this, Every winter the northern hemisphere is covered with snow and ice. Do the Oceans drop? Every Spring the northern hemisphere experiences vast flooding. Do the Oceans rise? Why? I’ll let you ponder that one for a while but first you will have to admit the lie everyone has been told.

Oh, and answer this! If there is going to be so much “Oceanic Flooding” then why are we told to “Conserve Water”? (where does fresh water come from? Warm weather => Evaporation => Condensation => Rain => Fresh Water!)