To link to the entire object, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed the entire object, paste this HTML in websiteTo link to this page, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed this page, paste this HTML in website

Ada Lois Sipuel, Plaintiff in Error vs Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, George L. Cross, Maurice H. Merrill, George Wadsack and Roy Gittinger, Defendants in Error No. 32,756 ) SYLLABUS 1. It is the state's policy, established by constitution and statutes, to segregate white and negro races for purpose of education in common and high schools and also institutions of higher education. (State ex rel Bluford v. Canada, 153 S. W. 2d. 12.)

2. It is the State Supreme Court's duty to maintain state's policy of segregating white and negro races for purpose of education so) long as it does not come in conflict with Federal Constitution. (State ex rel Bluford v. Canada, 153 S.W. 2d. 12)

4. Upon demand or substantial notice it is the duty of the Board of Regents of Higher Education and the board of control for Langston University to provide negroes with equal facilities of instruction as those enjoyed by students of the University cf Oklahoma, under statute, but the proper board is entitled to reasonable advance notice of the intention of negro students to require such facilities. (State v. Witham, 165 S. W. 2d. 378.)

[specific document title], Ada Lois Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, Civil Case No. 32756, Record Group 29-1-3, Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries, Oklahoma City, OK.

Rights and Permissions

Oklahoma State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries. For further information regarding the rights to this collection, please visit www.crossroads.odl.state.ok.us/cdm4/rights.php

Ada Lois Sipuel, Plaintiff in Error vs Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, George L. Cross, Maurice H. Merrill, George Wadsack and Roy Gittinger, Defendants in Error No. 32,756 ) SYLLABUS 1. It is the state's policy, established by constitution and statutes, to segregate white and negro races for purpose of education in common and high schools and also institutions of higher education. (State ex rel Bluford v. Canada, 153 S. W. 2d. 12.)

2. It is the State Supreme Court's duty to maintain state's policy of segregating white and negro races for purpose of education so) long as it does not come in conflict with Federal Constitution. (State ex rel Bluford v. Canada, 153 S.W. 2d. 12)

4. Upon demand or substantial notice it is the duty of the Board of Regents of Higher Education and the board of control for Langston University to provide negroes with equal facilities of instruction as those enjoyed by students of the University cf Oklahoma, under statute, but the proper board is entitled to reasonable advance notice of the intention of negro students to require such facilities. (State v. Witham, 165 S. W. 2d. 378.)

Citation

[specific document title], Ada Lois Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, Civil Case No. 32756, Record Group 29-1-3, Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries, Oklahoma City, OK.

Rights and Permissions

Oklahoma State Archives Division, Oklahoma Department of Libraries. For further information regarding the rights to this collection, please visit www.crossroads.odl.state.ok.us/cdm4/rights.php