Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register. Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:

Password

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:

Confirm Password:

Email Address

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:

OR

Log-in

User Name

Password

Remember Me?

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Additional Options

Miscellaneous Options

Automatically parse links in text

Automatically embed media (requires automatic parsing of links in text to be on).

Automatically retrieve titles from external links

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the'Submit Reply' button below

Topic Review (Newest First)

04-03-2009 01:10 AM

owenmccall

KISS the baby(stay) goodbye?

Thanks, Paul, for the very clear reply. I had not considered the effect of a baby stay on spinnaker handling. My initial thoughts were that perhaps a baby-stay (as opposed to a more forward, cutter-like, inner forestay) that was JUST big enough to fly the #4 could be attached at the hounds (thereby avoiding running backs) and far enough aft on the foredeck (forward edge of cabintop) to not be too interfering when tacking the genoa. The thought was that this would be rigged as a permanent stay, thereby avoiding the greater expense, rigging time, and clanking around when not in use (as you mentioned) of a removable stay. But maybe this is not such a hot idea after all.

04-02-2009 07:33 PM

paulk

Dear Own-
In his post, Jeff mentions that he likes to singlehand, and that having a babystay makes gybing the pole a P.I.T.A. and dangerous. With a babystay rigged, you have to do an end-for-end gybe. Singlehanded, this means lots of loose ends flapping around and things that can go wrong while the boat wallows through the maneuver with no one at the helm. The babystay also makes it necessary to handle the loose pole further out on the foredeck - adding to the danger. Using lazy sheets and guys without a babystay enables you to perform a dip pole gybe, which gives you much more control over the situation. It's also a lot quicker (and safer) to switch the guy in the jaws on a dip-pole gybe than it is to be fishing around with a pole swinging from just the topping lift.

If you're only going to rig your babystay in heavy weather, possibly to hoist a staysail or storm jib instead of your genoa, then you're not likely to be flying a spinnaker at that point, and the issue won't affect you. When the chute's up, the crew can put the babystay away. If you've got a boat that needs the babystay to keep the rig in the boat, or to bend the mast for tuning, then it's a different story. I've been on boats that stowed them when not needed, and even then they can be a hassle: clunking around and getting in the way of smooth leads and such. Getting a mast that's strong enough without is is a much simpler solution. K.I.S.S.

I don''t have a babystay. Boats with babystays are deal killers for me. As a single-hander babystays are such a pain in the butt and represent a real hazzard that a boat that needed a babystay would be scratched from my list. ...........
Jeff

This is a very old response of yours Jeff, but could you explain just what it is about baby stays that you don't like? I am thinking of adding one to my boat as a heavy air option (the rig does not require it).

Thanks,
Own

05-24-2002 06:30 AM

billhercus

Symphonie Baby Stay

Previous owner fitted an extension to the quick release handle to make removing the stay easier. However, it is under considerable tension and, having spent some time getting the mast shape OK and reasonable tension on the shrouds, there is no way I can reduce that tension on the baby stay. Removing it for the jibe is not really practical, I reckon.

End to end jibing is a bit of a faff though ....

04-10-2002 06:51 AM

davidk

Symphonie Baby Stay

Our babystay is 10mm dyneema with a swivel Gibb hook to the deck. Therefore it can be removed instantly, and it needs to be available because it doubles as our spinn pole uphaul/topping lift. We always remove the staysail before the spinn hoist, so this works. Infact when racing (i.e. when we will want a spinn hoist v quickly) we rarely use the staysail preferring the 135% Genoa or the blade jib as the upwind sail choice for speed. When cruising ... well the priorities are different.

04-04-2002 09:44 AM

Jeff_H

Symphonie Baby Stay

I don''t have a babystay. Boats with babystays are deal killers for me. As a single-hander babystays are such a pain in the butt and represent a real hazzard that a boat that needed a babystay would be scratched from my list. I have spent a fair amount of time on boats with babystays though and the solutions range right across the board.

Iam surprised that you have not heard back from Beneteau. I have always gotten very quick responses from Marion S.C.

Jeff

04-04-2002 09:17 AM

abbyleaII

Symphonie Baby Stay

Jeff
Thanks for the input. Only release mechanism I see in catalogs are ABI one for $350+ and a Johnson shroud lever for $46+. Johnson solution is good for 1500 lbs., but I have no idea what load my babv stay should handle. Still have not had a answer from Beneteau !!!
billhereus
what is the release mechanism on your boat ?

04-03-2002 08:56 AM

Jeff_H

Symphonie Baby Stay

It was not all that uncommon in the 1970''s to have a highfield lever and quick release pin for removing the baby stay for dip pole jibing. Alternatively the babystay would be made up on a block and tackle and would be eased back to the mast during a dip pole jibe. That said, it was not all that unusual to do an end for end jibe, even on a pretty big boat that had a babystay.

Jeff

04-03-2002 05:07 AM

abbyleaII

Symphonie Baby Stay

I have same question in jibing the whisker pole/Genoa on my B361. Dealer thought baby stay can be detached for down wind leg without any problem. I e-mailed factory (Mike Watson - Beneteau) asking if detachment was feasible--that was a week ago,still no answer. What quick detachable device do you have on your boat ? Please pass any more information you receive.

03-31-2002 09:27 AM

billhercus

Symphonie Baby Stay

Just purchased Jeanneau Symphonie. Previous owner - quite experienced racer did not remove baby stay for dip pole jibing as he had it under considerable tension and was nervous of removing it temporarily for the jibe. Used end to end jibe. However, the stay is equipped with a quick release mechanism (manufacturer) and I would like some advice here as dip pole jibing is easier?