Roger then lost to a much lesser player than Pete in the following round. Yes, Roger did play great that day, which I am sure Pete was not expecting in an early round match. Sort of like Rosol beating Nadal. He played way above his normal level for a whole match. Unlike Roger, however, it seems that Rosol has had his only day in the sun. If a lesser player is going to beat a top player, especially in a slam, an early round match is usually the time to do it.

Are you comparing top 20 19-years-old Federer with Rosol, a 27 years-old player outside top 50?

Fed'll never beat two guys, let alone 3 top 3 players. when he falls off his typical transition top 3 ranking, he will again lose to random top 10 journeymen (unless the top players couldn't care less like in Madrid, Wimbledon & WTF).

It's not like he had much trouble maintaining his top 3 ranking versus Hewitt, Nalbandian, Roddick, Baghdatis & Safin 7 years ago.

Fed'll never beat two guys, let alone 3 top 3 players. when he falls off his typical transition top 3 ranking, he will again lose to random top 10 journeymen (unless the top players couldn't care less like in Madrid, Wimbledon & WTF).

It's not like he had much trouble maintaining his top 3 ranking versus Hewitt, Nalbandian, Roddick, Baghdatis & Safin 7 years ago.

What do you call the World Tour finals? Oh wait, must be a joke since Federer has won it. Wait, Djokovic has won it twice. What a fucking anomaly but of course failya going to make exceptions to everything in the book. Please right on cue my dog, come back with more excuses.

What do you call the World Tour finals? Oh wait, must be a joke since Federer has won it. Wait, Djokovic has won it twice. What a fucking anomaly but of course failya going to make exceptions to everything in the book. Please right on cue my dog, come back with more excuses.

don't bother reasoning with heya or you'll go crazy

__________________Federer will win another grand slam.
Cilic is not a one slam wonder.