James,
do you mean push the priority consumption to a number of consumers dedicated
to just priority consumption? I understand that solution but unfortunately
it's not optimal for the architecture I'm currently working on. I'm
certainly interested in an activemq ordering of a queue based on the jms
priority id though if it ever comes up as an extension or addition. Thanks
much for the info, appreciate it.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 8/16/06, cmose <cjmose@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a current snapshot that supports the correct behavior of message
>> priority on a queue? I've got a july 26 snapshot of 4.1 that does not
>> appear
>> to support that functionality.
>
> We don't automatically reoorder queues into priority order right now.
> Though you can use selectors to for example have a pool of threads in
> multiple JVMs which just process high priority messages - which is
> often more predictable and safer than getting ActiveMQ to perform
> reordering of temporary dispatch buffers etc.
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-currently-a-version-that-supports-JMS-priority-id-on-Qs--tf2114799.html#a5835122
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.