Abstract. Since 2009, the ultra-wideband snow-radar on Operation IceBridge has acquired data in annual campaigns conducted during the Arctic and Antarctic springs. Progressive improvements in radar hardware and data processing methodologies have led to improved data quality for subsequent retrieval of snow depth. Existing retrieval algorithms differ in the way the air-snow and snow-ice interfaces are detected and localized in the radar returns, and in how the system limitations are addressed (e.g., noise, resolution). In 2014, the Snow Thickness On Sea Ice Working Group (STOSIWG) was formed and tasked with investigating how radar data quality affect snow depth retrievals and how retrievals from the various algorithms differ. The goal is to understand the limitations of the estimates and to produce a well-documented, long-term record that can be used for understanding broader changes in the Arctic climate system. Here, we assess five retrieval algorithms by comparisons with field measurements from two ground-based campaigns, including the BRomine Ozone Mercury EXperiment (BROMEX) at Barrow, Alaska and a field program by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) at Eureka, Nunavut, available climatology and snowfall from ERA-Interim reanalysis. The aim is to examine available algorithms and to use the assessment results to inform the development of future approaches. We present results from these assessments and highlight key considerations for the production of a long-term, calibrated geophysical record of springtime snow thickness over Arctic sea ice.

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 598 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 597 with geography defined
and 1 with unknown origin.

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

No discussed metrics found.

Latest update: 26 Sep 2017

Search articles

Download

Short summary

Since 2009, the ultra-wideband snow-radar on Operation IceBridge has acquired data in annual campaigns conducted during the Arctic and Antarctic springs. Existing snow depth retrieval algorithms differ in the way the air-snow and snow-ice interfaces are detected and localized in the radar returns, and in how the system limitations are addressed. Here, we assess five retrieval algorithms by comparisons with field measurements, ground-based campaigns, and analysed fields of snow depth.

Since 2009, the ultra-wideband snow-radar on Operation IceBridge has acquired data in annual...