EAP-TTLS/PAP Authentication Protocol Is Not Secure

EAP-TTLS/PAP Authentication Protocol Is Not Secure

January 14, 2020Jake Ludin

When designing a new network, there are countless features to consider that have a significant impact on the organization at large. Few functions of the network impact the users more than the authentication method chosen by decision makers.

If an organization seeks the best in network security, they turn to WPA2-Enterprise with 802.1X authentication. Each time a user connects to the network, their credentials are susceptible to over-the-air credential theft, so it’s vital that the process is rigidly protected. But authentication methods are not created equal, and some are more secure than others. Networks operating with a EAP-TTLS/PAP authentication method draw attention to themselves as targets for hackers because of the flawed systems under which EAP-TTLS/PAP operates. Many believe that EAP-TTLS/PAP should be avoided because glaring flaws exist in how it operates and newer authentication methods fill the security holes it leaves open.

Directory Support

User Experience

Compare and review the features and attributes each EAP method possesses

EAP-TTLS/PAP is a simple WPA2-Enterprise Wi-Fi authentication method that has been a standard system for many years. When a user wants to connect to the network, the device initiates communication with the network and confirms that it is the correct network by identifying the server certificate.Server certificate validation is one of the most important mechanisms to prevent over-the-air credential theft.

If the device can confirm the server certificate belongs to the known network, the user’s credentials are sent in an encrypted EAP tunnel. This sounds like a well-protected system for authenticating network users. The tunnel in which credentials are sent is encrypted and the user only sends credentials to a network that is confirmed by the device. Where does EAP-TTLS/PAP expose its weaknesses?

The process to configure a Windows device for a WPA2-Enterprise with server certificate validation enabled.

For the average network user, configuring their devices for EAP-TTLS/PAP can be a challenging process. It involves high-level IT knowledge to understand the steps involved, leading some to incorrectly configure the settings even if they’re provided a configuration guide. If just one device is misconfigured, the security benefits are thrown out the window because the user is sending their username through the air outside of the encrypted EAP tunnel.

Vulnerabilities of EAP-TTLS/PAP

There are simple credential theft tactics that anyone can perform against a network to steal this information, and if the attacker has obtained the private key of the RADIUS, they can decrypt SSL traffic and steal other credentials sent for authentication.

The primary attack method that exposes EAP-TTLS/PAP is aMan-In-The-Middle (MITM) attack. It is usually perpetrated by a user within the physical vicinity of the network or in a common area frequented by organization members, such as a coffee shop or bar. The attacker will configure an Evil Twin Access Point (AP) and RADIUS server for 802.1X authentication. Once configured, the next step is to spoof the desired SSID and push out a strong signal to fool users into unwittingly connecting to a hostile SSID. For authenticity, some may go as far as spoofing the legitimate MAC Address.

With the spoofed SSID in place, the attacker is ready to begin farming credentials. Users may attempt to connect to the spoofed network, or their device might automatically connect without the user knowing. Most devices are designed to seek out the network with the strongest signal, so the key for the hostile user to is to simply project a powerful signal. The device will attempt to connect and the SSID seems legitimate, but unbeknownst to the user, it’s a hostile SSID that’s farming stolen credentials.

Visualization of a Man-In-The-Middle attack, which can be exceptionally harmful due to EAP-TTLS/PAP sending credentials in cleartext.

A major flaw with EAP-TTLS/PAP is that credentials are sent over-the-air in “cleartext”, meaning they are not encrypted and can be read plainly. Anyone that farms credentials from a network using EAP-TTLS/PAP strikes gold; each set of credentials comes to them in cleartext and is ready to be reused for their purposes.

When someone steals encrypted credentials, they require additional tools and time to get them into a usable state. Although an experienced hacker would have the necessary tools and know how, this slowdown in the process could be key to giving time to discover the leak.

When credentials are sent in cleartext, calamity could strike from something as simple as an error in the EAP encryption process caused by a misconfiguration by one user. If this situation should occur, credentials would be flying through the air in cleartext, ready for anyone intercept. This flagrant weakness in EAP-TTLS/PAP could spell doom from the slightest hiccup in network security.

Better Alternatives to EAP-TTLS/PAP

SecureW2 began as an open source supplicant for Windows 7 devices to support EAP-TTLS/PAP, but the misuse of the protocol became unavoidable to the point that we now recommend against its use. The method is often misconfigured through allowing users to self-configure, and overall is a weak form of authentication. For stronger security, none are better than an EAP-TLS, certificate-based authentication method.

First and foremost, EAP-TLS as an authentication method is highly secure and prepared to thwart any ill-advised attacks on the network. Information sent over-the-air is protected in an encrypted EAP tunnel, but for added protection, all information sent through the tunnel is itself encrypted. If a MITM attack is launched, the data obtained is encrypted and unusable in that state.

To protect even further against attacks, it’s highly recommended that the network be configured for server certificate validation. This security measure requires each connecting user to authenticate the RADIUS server certificate to ensure that information is only ever sent to the correct SSID. Both the device and network are accurately identified by their certificates, negating the possibility that anything is sent to an illegitimate SSID.

Historically, certificates were not deployed mainstream because of the high-level configuration process. But because of their value to security,onboarding software has been developed to simplify the process; specifically, SecureW2’s onboarding solution. Users that seek network access connect and are prompted to complete an onboarding procedure with a few, easy steps. Once completed, their identity is confirmed, and they are issued a certificate. The user now has unfettered, secure network access for the life of the certificate.

Don’t Compromise Your Network with EAP-TTLS/PAP

The method of authentication used for the network has an enormous impact on the overall security of your organization. Each day, network users are going to reconnect to the network and require a reliable and secure method of authentication. If the process to connect to the secure SSID is susceptible to outside attacks, the security measures of the entire network can be compromised.

Just one set of credentials are needed to access the network, so it’s vital to deploy a foolproof authentication process. SecureW2 offers affordable options for organizations of all shapes and sizes. Click here to inquire about pricing.

Related Posts

A man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack is an incredibly dangerous type of cyber attack that involves a hacker infiltrating a private network by impersonating a rogue access point and acquiring login credentials. According to IBM’s X-Force Threat Intelligence Index, 35% of exploitation …

Organizations from around the world are making the much needed transition to cloud-based network solutions. To ease the transition, Microsoft created Azure to aid clients moving their directories from the on-premise Active Directory (AD) to the cloud. However, Azure is …

What is a Certificate Authority? A Certificate Authority is the body that handles the certificate management for a PKI. They assist in validating the identities of different websites, individuals and devices before administering digital certificates to them. In a PKI …