It is one thing to boycott anti-gun companies . It is another to boycott gun companies for simply refusing to join in an effort .
I think our efforts should be directed against our enemies .

They make them, we buy them. It is called coersion for the greater good. In this case it is Freedom. Supplying goods and services to an enemy will only embolden their cause, there comes a time to choose sides.

[QUOTE=Tackleberry1;1176364]So... you'd be happy with a Glock that held only 7 rounds while LEO's get to walk around carrying 17 rounds?

Tack-
That is an unfair question.

The issue is one of strategy. The proper question is, " Do we use our resources to punish gun makers for selling to an oppressive government or do we use those resources to punish the extremists who actually want to confiscate our guns " ?
I say, " Pick your battles " . Selling to governments is not as bad as donating to Bloomberg's gang or banning gun advertising, is it ?

Instead : Why not boycott some anti-gun company for doing business with the enemy ?

Yes... There are many companies who support our enemies but NONE of them rely on gun owners for 75% to 100% of there sales.

Gun manufacturers are the most "at risk" for this type of activity because government sales make up so little of there total production.

We, the American consumer, through our support of gun products, drive all of the innovation in the marketplace. Our dollars are the reason we have hundreds of manufacturers and thousands of products to choose from... THEREFORE... we have every right to deny our money to companies who do not support us by cutting of government sales and spending it with there competitors who do.

Effective

Tack

[quote=Rentacop;1176595]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tackleberry1

So... you'd be happy with a Glock that held only 7 rounds while LEO's get to walk around carrying 17 rounds?

Tack-
That is an unfair question.

The issue is one of strategy. The proper question is, " Do we use our resources to punish gun makers for selling to an oppressive government or do we use those resources to punish the extremists who actually want to confiscate our guns " ?
I say, " Pick your battles " . Selling to governments is not as bad as donating to Bloomberg's gang or banning gun advertising, is it ?

Instead : Why not boycott some anti-gun company for doing business with the enemy ?