barton fires last year

I find it rather odd that the third person mentioned at one point, in connection with the fires, was never mentioned again. Does this mean that if the third person took part in the fires, he/she will not be charged? How do we know that he/she wasn't the one to "con" the brothers into doing these fires. Why was he never mentioned again??

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.