Well the real problem, is the "openess" of the 2 middle nodes. If they were better concealed by a wall, so that the tank and the guns at the top walls, and well all outside help, other than players on foot, can not destroy them, this may help. The defence in the middle is just too strong. Other than that, no clue, except take them out, and see how it runs._________________I'm the mapper, he's the DJ

I just have a simple idea. Remove turrets and tanks and believe me then gameplay on this map will be a lot better .

You can't change ANYTHING on the map without author's permission (the only exception are things that are changed via mutators or new link setups). I mean, sure, you can change it if you want, but expect to be blamed by all mappers for changing a other mapper map without permission. I don't recommend that, because this would mean that you will be unofficially "kicked" from the mapping community.

Back to topic... Maybe we should try to connect PN1 with PN 2 or 4 with 3?

/Edit: that was my 200 post, woohoo! Unspamstoppable!

Last edited by Meledictum on Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:37 pm; edited 1 time in total

You see? That is exactly what proprietary software leads to. If the author would have given everyone freedom to change the map the way he likes we would not have this problem.

This is one of many examples where you can benefit from free software in your everyday life.

Not to start a flamewar again here, but I used to include this "license statement" even in software to which I released the sourcecodes. The reasons behind that simply was I wanted to be asked, so I that I was informed what people were actually doing and changing, not that I would have forbidden it... please don't jump to any conclusions just because an author requests being asked for permissions before changes, some people are just stupid and the author may well better know which changes actually make sense and which don't....

.... now back to topic please _________________-=]I AM GETTING TOO OLD FOR SUBTLETY[=-

it is OK to change node setup with out asking the auther. Until we find him to ask, we could always just change the setup. Take out the middle nodes and see what happens.

That is supossed to be a quote!!!!

Anyways, has anyone done anyting with this? we have allot of suggestions, but no answers yet.

It looks like this died. I was in BitchSlap yesterday, and they were up to and over 45 minutes, and still fighting for the middle 2 nodes. As all mappers know, you can rearange your nodes as you like. Not move the node, but to change there setup. I will do this if nooneelse has yet, and remake the setup._________________I'm the mapper, he's the DJ

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou cannot attach files in this forumYou cannot download files in this forum