Hi folks,
I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on May the 4th,
2012. For newcomers, help yourself to the audios at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And you’ll find, if you go into them in
enough depth and stick with it, you’ll understand the system you’re born
into. You’ll understand why things are happening with such rapidity
today, and you’ll also understand how long it was in the works. A hundred
years in the making and even more in some parts of it, to bring in this controlled,
ordered, planned society globally, under a global system of government.
And it’s not democratic by any means at all. In fact, the United Nations,
which is trying to take over right now, doesn’t label itself as a democratic
institution. The Club of Rome, the big think tank for the United Nations
has said so too, that democracy doesn’t work. There’s too many
conflicting parties, all with their own ideas, so, they simply bypass it and
bring in an authoritarian system. And that’s why you’re seeing so much
happening in your own countries right now, even under the guise of terrorism.

Remember
too that you bring me to you. You can buy the books and discs at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com, where hopefully you’ll understand the past, the
present, and also the future, if you go through them. You’ll understand
nothing if you don’t understand the past. Nothing at all. So, buy
the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And that will keep me
ticking along to give you more information. Remember too, from the US to
Canada, use a personal check or an international postal money order, send cash,
or you can use PayPal. It’s all on cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And
straight donations are really welcome. And across the world, Western Union,
Money Gram, and PayPal, once again.

We do live in a planned system. And under this guise
of terrorism, of course, that came along at the right time, the right time to
get the whole agenda through, that is, then everything is going full-blast
across the whole planet, as the old school, as they call them, the guys that
owned the money systems a long, long time ago, put their plan into action, to
take over all the world’s resources. That’s including food and water, by
the way, and all the minerals, all the oil, everything. Everything
basically that they need to manufacture for the future, they’ve taken it over
through plunder and war. Not for countries, but for themselves, because,
you see, they’re supranational, they’re above nations. They’re international.
And they brought us this new globalist system.

Why do we
bother voting when everything comes from the United Nations or through
international treaties from private organizations? We don’t vote in these
organizations, and yet you wait and see. You wait and see. If you
thought Agenda 21 was bad enough, and the Millennium project, you wait and see
until Maurice Strong’s agenda comes through with the next part in June, from
the global summit of the Rio meeting. And that’s going to make you
really, really angry, I’d imagine. Other folks will think, “well, it’s
not hitting us right away.” It will be gradual. “I’ll be happy and
play like I have before.” That’s how most folk react, because the media
won’t make a big deal about it. It’s only through alternative media
you’ll understand what’s actually going on, because no one else bothers to look
at it, you see. Governments all know what’s going on, right down to your
local governments, and even your town councils, because they’re already
following the plans of the Millennium project and Agenda 21. And so are
the schools, of course, as they rear a whole nation, and nations, many nations
of young greenies to live in a sort of Communistic society with the help of Big
Pharma. I’ll be back with more, after this break.

Hi folks,
I’m Alan Watt, and we’re back Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking
about this big amazing system we live in, as it rolls ahead with the big
agenda. And there definitely is a big agenda. Why do you think the
United Nations was set up in the first place? Go into its history.
Find out what the purposes were at the time, and you’ll find out that long
before it was called the United Nations, and when it was called the League of
Nations, it was set up by the same big, powerful banking families that formed
the CFR and the Royal Institute of International Affairs. The same groups
basically that promoted Communism, and they funded it too, the big
bankers. They funded the Communist system in Russia from the very
beginning, right through to its demise at the end.

And it was
no demise, because it was all planned, as the man from the Ford Foundation
said, the CEO, back in the 50s, during the Reece Commission. He said that
eventually the Soviet system will merge with the West, even through education
and other means too, and it will be a new type of system. Exactly what
Lenin said too, about one generation would pass and then the dictatorship would
change or fall, and the new system would come in. Not quite capitalist,
not quite communist. They call it Socialism. But really, it’s a
eugenical type of Socialism. It’s the old idea that there are superior
people who should run the planet, that was also echoed by Mr. Rockefeller
himself, and the end of nations should come to pass. They’ve had their
day. And it was time now for the elite and an educated class to basically
govern over the people. It’s not a democratic system, as I say. And
at the moment, for those who still vote, you may have noticed, I hope so, that
your countries are not democratic at all.

Now, it’s
surprising too that regardless of what they want to call the system you live
under, whether it’s Communist or Capitalist, it’s always the same handlers at
the top, basically, and even in the Communist system, the first order of the
day was to get a Central Bank on the go, much like we’ve got across the whole
of (so called) the Capitalist countries. You’ll find all of this again if
you go into the writings of Professor Carroll Quigley who was the historian for
this particular organization. And he got into the archives and wrote
books about it, and how they had such a massive hand in changing history,
directing the future, that he thought it was time that the general public
should know. So, Macmillan published his book, probably without reading
much of it, and then, about two months later they cracked the plates.
They smashed the plates when they found out he was letting everything out of
the bag to the general public. But there are books out there.
There’s reprints too. And as far as I can see, they’re the same as the
original one there. So, try and get a hold of Professor Carroll Quigley’s
books.

As I say,
we’re going through this system. And regardless of what they want to call
this system, the New Era, the Green Society, whatever, it’s going to be the
same old system we’ve really, really had. Because, you see, the top
federal bureaucracies in all countries, are pretty well
intergenerational. They have special schools for their own children, just
like the United Nations does too. Those who work there have their special
schools to breed more bureaucrats for the next generation. It’s been like
that for a long, long time. And regardless of the system, as I say, that
they want to call themselves, you’ll find the bureaucrats of one system live
comparatively well on a level with those of another system. Even the
Soviets admitted that. Their bureaucrats lacked nothing all through the
Cold War. They lived the same lifestyle as those in the West.

Now, in
Beijing, that’s still technically Communist, supposedly. In fact, it’s
the model state for the world, remember, according to the big boys
themselves. The United Nations has said that many times. We’ve all
to emulate that. Now, it’s not a democratic society. And they have
no problems dealing with or saying that the elite should rule, the
intelligentsia should rule the lesser peoples. They have no problem with
the division of labor on a class basis, basically. And it’s basically written
into their whole charter. It says here:

Membership in the upper ranks of
the Chinese Communist Party has always had a few undeniable advantages. There
are the state-supplied luxury sedans,

(Alan: Just like it is everywhere else)

special schools for the young ones

(A: Same as here and everywhere else.)

and even organic produce grown on
well-guarded, government-run farms.

(A: Just like here and everywhere else, you see.)

When they fall ill, senior leaders
can check into 301 Military Hospital....

(A: Just like here and everywhere else. When
they changed the laws in the 90s, in the US and in Canada, and in Britain,
Australia, New Zealand, and elsewhere, that politicians could go into the top
military hospitals if they need any help at all. Strange that we’re all really
the same, but we call ourselves different. We’re supposed to be
democratic. Anyway, it says here:)

But even in their most addled
moments of envy, ordinary Beijingers could take some comfort in the knowledge
that the soupy air

(A: The polluted air they breathe. We do too;
we’ve got all the chemtrails.)

they breathe on especially
polluted days also finds its way into the lungs of the privileged and pampered.

Such assumptions, it seems, are
not entirely accurate.

As it turns out, the homes and
offices of many top leaders are filtered by high-end devices, at least
according to a Chinese company, the Broad Group, which has been promoting its
air-purifying machines in advertisements that highlight their ubiquity in
places where many officials work and live.

Well, isn’t that kind of nice for them? You
understand, they keep talking about the classless societies. And some
countries have done a good job of convincing the public of all classes that
there is no class system. More so in the US, because the accents tend to
cloud everything there. Whereas in Britain, of course, you have to adopt
the upper class accent. And really, that came from a bastardization of
English, because Old King George, you see, only spoke German. And the
court had to copy him, and suddenly do the same. Before that, of course,
some of the court from the Norman times spoke French. And so, the court
only spoke French. So, the court always adopts, basically the upper
Middle Class adopts the accent and the dialect, and so on, of whoever rules the
country. So, it helps in the class thing, because, how can you be better
than other people if you talk the same way, or dress the same way, behave, act,
or eat the same way? You see? And live in the same places.
So, class, I think will always be with you, because that’s the system we’re
in. And under the monetary system, it doesn’t change whether you’re in a
communist country or a capitalist country. It doesn’t change at
all. And most of the public never figure it out.

So anyway,
governments also in the West and everywhere else, always tend to get their own
families in, or in-laws in to governments or bureaucracies.
Bureaucracies, according to Hitler were so important. Almost more
important than the guy who’s voted in. And he likened it to Winston
Churchill getting power over Britain via the bureaucracy. He said, if you
get them on your side, then you can do anything with the country. And
that is so incredibly true.

We’re run
by bureaucrats. Houses come and go of politicians, but the bureaucrats
stay the same. They’re there for life, you see. And so are their
children and children and children. That’s how it really works. And
that started even in the US, right after the Revolution, they were already trying
to get their children in. And you should read about it in your history
books.

Now, as
they say at the top, of course, there’s never been such an amazing gap between
the rich and the poor. And it’s true. It’s true, because the cash
is going into fewer and fewer hands, as the pirates at the top basically
squander it all, and eliminate all competition. They get rid of
them. And during these times of bank raids and everything else in
different countries in wars and plunder, they’ve got so much cash to get.
It’s just incredible, untold wealth they can plunder from nations, using
governments, of course, and then they’re getting their cuts from oil fields and
all that kind of stuff that’s going on all the time.

The world
is divvied up, as I said before, with all of its resources. And
government is not helping the people, at all, in any country that I can
see. They’re helping the corporations, because that’s all part of this
new system, along with the United Nations. The United Nations, as I say,
is not a democratic institution. It was set up by the richest people on
the planet. It has a Communistic, Socialistic bent, the way that it talks
to the general public, but in reality, it’s just the Socialist form of control
is the easiest form of control over masses of people, because bureaucrats and
agencies from government working with private sectors can get a lot more done,
than if it was democratic, you see. And this is their perfect society.

And as
they’re doing this, and they’re going off to war, and they’re paying billions
out to private corporations, as everything is privatized across the world, in
Britain, again, Britain was one of the first countries to have a national
health service. It worked great at the start, of course, but it was never
designed to keep that way. They wanted to eventually privatize them
all. And people talked about that at the beginning. They’d give it
so many years, and then they’d start to create crisis in the Health Care.
And, of course, as they go through all these wars, they keep saying, oh my
goodness, we can’t afford to, you know, treat your illnesses at the same
time. So, they’re slashing it to the bone. And when the
International Monetary Fund comes into play, they do slash everything to the
bone. The first thing to go is Health Care.

If you
follow the trail of the International Monetary Fund, you’ll find that
tuberculosis and a whole host of diseases follows in its wake as it ends up
taking over the country. It takes over really the government of the
country. It tells them what they can spend and what they can’t spend on.

Family GPs are ordered to cut
number of patients referred to hospital to earn extra cash

Family doctors are being ordered
to slash the numbers of patients they send to hospital to earn extra cash.

Six out of ten GPs said they face
‘inappropriate’ pressure to refer fewer patients and potentially deny them the
best care.

The controversial scheme can pay
out almost £9,000 a year to surgeries.

It started last May when ministers

(A: Politicians and so on.)

brought in a series of targets
enabling GPs to be rewarded for cutting the number of patients sent to
hospital specialists or A&E departments.

However, a poll of 667 doctors
found that 60 per cent were facing ‘inappropriate demands’ from managers.

The NHS has been told to save (A: this
is another) £20billion over the next three years, leaving health
trust managers looking for ways to cut costs.

The problem is too, you see, part of the reason that they
got into all the crisis was the government enabled masses of, again,
bureaucrats to run the National Health Service. The old system was
fine. There was fewer chiefs at the top. Now it seems to be all
chiefs at the top. And everybody in government and bureaucrats wants to
get their family into things. Well, you just put them in charge of
hospitals on the big panels that run them, these trust companies, as they call
them. Back with more, after this break.

Hi folks, I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix.
And back in ’95 or so, I think it was Granitestein, a man called Granitestein,
a reporter for the Toronto Sun came out with the news that the US and Canada
had signed an agreement that all electronic devices for communication must have
chips put in them and backdoors, so that agencies could wiretap them or listen
in to conversations on phones, all faxes, everything else. So, that was
back in 1995. So, here’s an update here. We know for sure, for
instance that they’ve been doing that steadily since then onwards to pretty well
all your emails and everything else. We know that, because there’s been
so much leaked out over the years. But you understand too, if they come
out with all this at the beginning, instead of telling you, oh, there’s lots of
pornography on the internet. If they told you that there’s nothing safe,
nothing personal, it’s for government use in government agencies, would you
really have got a computer? See, they give you time to chomp away and get
used to it, and then they gradually introduce it, knowing you won’t throw the
thing away, you see. It’s quite simple psychology. Anyway, it says:

FBI: We need wiretap-ready Web
sites - now

The FBI is asking Internet
companies not to oppose a controversial proposal that would require firms,
including Microsoft, Facebook, Yahoo, and Google, to build in backdoors for
government surveillance.

(A: Like they don’t have them already. Of
course they’ve got them already, so there’s something else going on here.)

In meetings with industry
representatives, the White House, and U.S. senators, senior FBI officials argue
the dramatic shift in communication from the telephone system to the Internet
has made it far more difficult for agents to wiretap Americans suspected of
illegal activities, CNET has learned.

(A: Now remember too, that even Pilger said the
other day, we’re all in prison now, so, really, we’re all suspects.
Everyone is a suspect. If you think at all, outside the box, you’re a
suspect. That’s really what they’re looking for. It’s not for terrorists.
Technically, you are a terrorist if you can think. If you’re not
prattling on about Dancing With the Stars, or American Idol, or something like
that, then you’re not classified as safe, if you’re actually talking about
something that matters.)

The FBI general counsel's office
has drafted a proposed law that the bureau claims is the best solution:
requiring that social-networking Web sites and providers of VoIP, instant
messaging, and Web e-mail alter their code to ensure their products are
wiretap-friendly.

(A: Isn’t that a nice term, Wiretap-friendly.)

"If you create a service,
product, or app that allows a user to communicate, you get the privilege of
adding that extra coding," an industry representative who has reviewed the
FBI's draft legislation told CNET. The requirements apply only if a threshold
of a certain number of users is exceeded, according to a second industry
representative briefed on it.

So, really
there’s no privacy at all. And we are all suspects, especially if you can
think. If you’re not prattling about what you’re ‘trended’ to talk about,
you see, if you’re not prattling about that, then they’ve got to look into you
to see why you’re still thinking, for yourself, that is, you know, asking
questions. Asking questions.

And I’ve
talked so many times about psychopaths, and I might put up a link tonight on a
couple of videos that are out there, but the guys at the top pretty well are
all psychopaths. Politicians, even in psychiatric books, were classed as
psychopaths right up until the late 70s. That’s when psychiatry lost its
credibility, when it became political, it obeyed political decisions about many
things, and normalized a lot of things, and even politicians. Before that
they called them hysterical attention-seeking psychopaths, the same as any
actor or actress.

So, here’s
a good example here.

'I'm ready for a comeback':
Blair's made millions since quitting... now he wants to 're-engage with UK
politics'

And of course, he’s been appointed to the Middle East for
quite a few years, supposedly under some strange semi-government treaty or
organization he works with, a quartet. And at the same time he was also
working with JP Morgan and raking in the cash there. Anyway, there’s a
good psychopath wanting to make a comeback. And I’m sure he probably
knows that most folk can’t remember that he was even in before; that’s how fast
your memory goes these days, with the food that you’re eating and everything
else hitting you.

Another one
too for Canadians is:

Taxes cost Canadian families more
than food, clothing, and shelter combined

And it’s
just starting folks, just starting.

In London the Metro Police are stockpiling plastic
bullets. Of course they’ve already got the real ones as well, much like
they have got in the US, with all the millions of hollow-points coming in, just
in case things get ugly. You know, that kind of thing. And, because
they’re all worried now about the economy going down again. See, it will
only go down and collapse when it’s time to collapse it again. But if it
happens before through some mistake or whatever, or some pirate coming in
that’s not part of the club and plundering on his own, and it collapses, then
obviously there’ll be chaos. And that’s how they deal with chaos, you know.
They don’t chat to people and say, “hey, look, we’re in a terrible mess, etc,
etc, and here’s what happened, and here’s what we have to do.” They just
turn the forces on the public. That’s how governments always deal with
these situations.

And also:

US military-industrial giant KBR
in bidding to privatize British police forces

(A: This is from the Dallas News.)

Hailed as the largest police
privatization scheme in the UK, it has been suggested the private companies who
win the contract will be tasked to perform several police functions --
including patrols, detention and criminal investigation.

(A: By the way, they even have Children’s Services,
like SWAT Teams and that, to grab children. All the things that cops are
all up to nowadays, they have all sections for that as well.)

KBR, a former subsidiary of the
Halliburton group,

(A: Well, is that a surprise?)

has attracted its share of
criticism over the large contracts it won with the US government during the
recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The corporation also helped to build the
Guantanamo Bay detention facility.

So, welcome to Britain, as they privatize
everything. And these guys, remember, are not responsible to the
public. Go and complain to your councillors and your officials: “Well, we
don’t deal with that; they’re private. We can’t tell them not to touch
you.” Back with more, after this break.

Hi folks, we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
Talking about the craziness of the system, and how things are presented to the
general public. And of course, it’s altered by the electronic media too,
as Marshal McLuhan said, that it distorts everything, even through
electronics. You don’t see body language; even on television it’s
different because television will eventually emulate the system which it is,
which is electronic. It’s like Hollywood making movies about
Hollywood. That’s how it becomes eventually, bizarre. Even the news
has all these flashing little scrolls going along the bottom and on the side,
and all these screens behind them of Mickey Mouse and things like that, and you
don’t listen to what’s actually being said, as far as news goes. In other
words, it creates its own format, which really isn’t news at all, and it
becomes entertainment as Marshal McLuhan said. Anyway, getting back to
what I’m talking about.

The Energy Efficient Home, this is what was done in
Germany. This was their showpiece, that everyone would be living in,
these energy efficient homes, you see. And it says:

In the story of the fools of Schilda,

(A: Like a fairy tale.)

the citizen fools built a city
hall but forgot the windows. So they put sunlight inside bags and carried it
inside. Now a new episode of the fools of Schilda has been written in Berlin.
Today’s fools are in a state of panic over the world’s energy reserves and
dangerous atomic radiation.

(A: Maybe they put lead lining outside of it too.)

And so they’ve built a house that
produces more energy than it can use and is supposed to fulfill the dream of

(A: Being 100% run by itself.)

“100% supplied by renewable
energy”.

When it comes to transforming its
energy supply, no cost is too high for the German government. As a flagship
project, the shimmering blue “Efficiency Plus with Electromobility”

(A: As it’s called, and links to that, you can see
all the photographs and everything.)

was ceremoniously opened on 7
December 2011 by the German Chancellor Angela Merkel and a Federal Minister,
and has been recently occupied by a test family.

Federal Minister Peter Ramsauer
said, “We want to show people that a completely renewable energy supply is
already possible today and is an every-day thing. Our motto: ‘My home is my
petrol station.’

(A: Like gasoline station.)

The house should not and will not
stay a prototype: What we are presenting here is the home of the future.”

(A: And I guess it’s for those that can afford it,
because it was an awful lot, 2.2 million euros it cost, so you can
imagine. This is what government does, right? So, it says here:)

In a brochure issued by the
Federal Ministry for Transportation, Construction and Urban Development
(BMVBS), we find the following technical information, data and claims:

“The surplus energy the house
produces is stored in a house battery and in an electric car, which acts both
as a storage and user of energy. Both home and mobility are thus independent of
the power grid.

The house is ecologically
sustainable, fully recyclable and highly energy-efficient. No fossil fuels
based energies are needed and no CO2 emissions are caused.”

(A: I guess the folk inside don’t even breathe.)

The monthly energy need is given
by the following chart.

(A: And it gives you a chart. It says:)

But a check of the data yields a
different picture.

Misrepresented in the chart of
energy demand given by the BMVBS is the monthly power generation of the
photovoltaic system. In the wintertime when you have the highest demand for
electricity and power, only 10% of the energy needed is generated.

(A: So it can only generate 10% of what they claim.)

Using the monthly averages for PV
generation in the region of Berlin in 2011, the following monthly energy budget
results:

(A: They give you what actually it costs to keep the
damn place heated.)

Thus the house is not energy
independent and self-sufficient. By taking a close look at the daily amounts
one sees that in the winter months the photovoltaic system delivers no energy. (A: At
all.) The planned batteries with a capacity of 40 kWh barely
suffices to cover the night in the summertime.

(A: In other words, lighting.)

The necessary capacity for the
wintertime would have to be more than 100 times greater, i.e. 4500 kWh (approx.
30% of the annual need). For this no technology is in sight.

The heat pump and electromobility
increase the winter peak demand for electricity by a factor of 4 with respect
to purely conventional power need.

(A: So, it takes power from the general grid.)

The niche technology of
photovoltaics cannot replace a single kilowatt of power plant output.

The price tag for the “energy
efficiency home” is pegged at 2.2 million EUR.

So, I’ll put that up for you too, and it’s quite amazing
how they just rush ahead with these wonderful ideas, eh? Of course,
you’re paying for it all. It doesn’t matter. And here’s:

Countries like the USA who have
been seduced by German socialists and Greens into thinking that solar energy
and green energy feed-in schemes are a job creator and an engine to prosperity
ought to think again. Der Spiegel reports.

The global solar industry has
entered a brutal phase of consolidation and nowhere are the effects as dramatic
as in eastern Germany. Several companies have already declared bankruptcy,

(A: Just like the US)

leaving towns and cities in the
region struggling with job losses and tax revenue shortfalls.

(A: And the cost, of course, because they’re all
funded by your taxpayer, even to set them up. The Solyndra, in fact, in
the US, you know, has left a heck of a mess there of heavy metals and toxic
stuff. And the taxpayer is going to have to clean all that up too.
Anyway, getting back to this article, it says:)

The sun, it was said, was going to
save Frankfurt an der Oder, a city of 60,000 on the Polish border. After years
of post-reunification economic doldrums, whose nadir came with the 2003 failure
of a much-ballyhooed microchip factory project, the burgeoning German solar
industry took an interest in the down-on-its-luck city.

So, he talks about setting up the manufacturer of Conergy,
it was called. And how basically they declared bankruptcy after getting
all the government funding, etc, etc. And what a mess it’s in. But
that’s the story of most of what’s coming. Mind you, it won’t stop
them. You understand, there are people at the top, especially
bureaucrats, and it was a bureaucrat that explained this to me, who worked in
the US. And he said, government once it sets its eyes on something, its
sights on something, it’s hard to change the course it’s on, because it goes
around corners on square wheels. That’s how he likened it. And it’s
true. You can’t depend on government for a sudden correct answer to
something. They keep plowing on, even though, of course, after all,
they’re so used to just burning up your cash. And the bankers love it,
because the governments keep going to them for more loans and the bankers live
on interest. Plus they own the countries, basically, by holding that
interest. Quite something. Quite something indeed.

Another
article is about electrical pollution. And it says, are we being
poisoned? Now that we’ve got so much wi-fi and everything else.
It’s a standard story that you get though, where they give you a lot of scary
stories, and then they go back into, “well, is it hurting you, or is it not
hurting you,” like television does. You notice that? And they
always leave it at the end like, well, it’s up to you, and your opinion.
Instead of just giving you the hard facts. Anyway, it’s got some good
stuff at the beginning, and how the folk get sick with it. There’s been
so many studies on it. But, of course, the big boys in government, with
the companies that own all of this energy, etc, are always lobbying them, to
say, it’s okay. It’s up to you how you want to believe.

And this
article is quite good too. It’s about Facebook and others. And it
says:

How Many Facebook Friends Do You
Have?

(A: It says:)

A Study Links Narcissism and
Facebook Activity

(A: Everybody has been studied on these free sites,
eh? Because governments are really obsessed with knowing all about
everyone, and having a pulse on the people. And here you have people just
throwing up all their data, quite happily, to be studied by all the
universities that are given access to all the data. And, of course, all
the government agencies too, and the shadow governments. It says:)

For the average narcissist,
Facebook is tool that may promote anti-social behavior.

Facebook “offers a gateway for
hundreds of shallow relationships and emotionally detached communication,”

(A: Well, it has to be, again, because the medium
becomes the whole system itself, not people. And that’s how media acts if
it’s electronic.)

according to study by Western
Illinois University professor Christopher Carpenter.

The study was published this month
in Personality and Individual Differences,

(A: It’s called.)

the official journal of the
International Society for the Study of Individual Differences.

In the study, Carpenter defined narcissism
as “a pervasive pattern of grandiosity,

(A: Kind of like Tony Blair.)

need for admiration

(A: Like Tony Blair.)

and an exaggerated sense of
self-importance,”

(A: Like Tony Blair, you know.)

according to a press release from
the university.

Using a Narcissistic Personality
Inventory, Carpenter and his students surveyed 292 people – most of whom were
college students – to measure “self-promoting” Facebook behavior, such as
people posting status updates, their photos, updating profile information; as
well as “anti-social behaviors,” including seeking social support more than
providing it,

(A: The ones who take and don’t give.)

getting angry when others do not
comment on status updates and retaliating against negative comments.

(A: Well, it’s the same thing when you look at a lot
of the youtube videos up there. Look at the comments beneath them.
And you’ll see the ones who are always retaliating against negative comments,
or putting in negative comments too. Especially about themselves.)

People who score higher on the
inventory promoted themselves more on Facebook – by tagging themselves and
updating their newsfeeds more frequently, and by having more friends on
Facebook, according to a report in the Guardian newspaper.

The study concluded that grandiose
exhibitionism correlated with anti-social behavior on Facebook. Self-esteem was
negatively related to self-promotion and anti-social behaviors on the site.

“In general, the ‘dark side’ of
Facebook requires more research in order to better understand Facebook’s
socially beneficial....”

I know who
it’s beneficial to. It’s to the guys who own it, who are worth
multi-billions for a so-called free site. Because of course, they’re
making all this cash by selling all your information to all the shadow
government agencies. It won’t stop anybody, of course, because, well,
they like it. You know. They kind of like it. And they’re
being taught and trained that privacy is a drag, man. It’s really a drag,
isn’t it, privacy stuff; who needs it?

Now, I’ve mentioned before how the IQ dropped back in the
90s. And things don’t suddenly drop when an IQ, basically, intelligence
quota, is innate within you. And there’s a lot of factors involved, sure, food
and all the rest of it, but they’ve had inoculations like crazy. They
keep stepping them up for youngsters. And we’ve seen autism go sky high
for instance, with the more inoculations they get. And the food is
junk. We’re eating chemicalized, really, it’s the garbage disposal
unit. That’s what food in grocery stores are now for the general public,
where they put all the waste, the toxic waste from the chemical industries in
your food to give it some kind of strange taste. But that’s what you get
at the bottom. You don’t get that fancy stuff from government grown
farms, etc, for organics. And this is all done by design. Anyway,

Intelligence quotients (IQs) have
risen in developed nations for almost a century. This phenomenon, named the
“Flynn effect” after the New Zealand intelligence researcher James Flynn, was
first identified in 1984 in the United States. It has been found to occur in
all developed nations, and some others as well. The received wisdom became: IQs
always go up.

(A: That’s what they used to believe.)

But this trend seems to be
stopping and even reversing in some countries, research in Britain, Denmark and
Norway has shown. It is discomfiting to find intelligence in decline. There is
a strong association between a nation’s IQ, its prosperity and health.

(A: Well, do you need a genius to tell you
that? If you can’t get good food and all the rest of it, and you’re
unhealthy, you’re not going to be too bright. Obvious. Like they haven’t known this in the Middle
Ages and other times when they’ve caused famine on the public.)

IQ testing is contentious and
regarded by some as a crude indicator of ability or potential.

(A: And it goes on to mention other things, like, as
I say, nature/nurture, education. They’re talking about the class system
in other words.)

IQs are collated such that the
average test score is 100.

Then they go into the standard deviation, which is about
15 either way. Anyway, they go on to say eventually that it’s been
dropping by about another 6 points or more. In Britain, again, Denmark,
Norway, and some other countries. So, that doesn’t happen by
itself. Something, like any detective story, what has changed?
What’s changed? What makes you healthy, in other words? What’s
changed? And it doesn’t take much to find the answers.

And tonight
too, I’m also putting up one on, they’re talking about Agenda 21. Here’s an
example of Agenda 21 that’s going to get a lot worse, because, you see, they
don’t want anyone living on the coastline, eventually. The United Nations
said that years ago, back in the early 90s. They want to get you all off
the coastline, so they can have it for their own, you know, beauty spots, when
they can drop off in helicopters and have some sunbathing on the beach.
That’s the elite themselves, you see. It says:

Planning a vacation this summer to
Miami’s Biscayne Bay for a little fishing?

Think again, because the National
Park Service wants to set aside a large swath of the pristine area as a marine
reserve zone, so you might have to leave the fishing poles at home. And the
boat.

Perhaps horseback riding is more
your speed and the family plans to ride through California’s Sequoia or Kings
Canyon National Parks? Sorry, but all of the permits were pulled for those
activities this summer.

Or maybe you just want to lounge
on the soft sands of North Carolina’s Outer Banks and read a novel, fly a kite
with the kids, toss a Frisbee to the dog, and watch dad catch some fish?

No, no, no and no.

Beachcombers along specific
stretches of those legendary shores are seeing signs telling them to leave
their kites and pets at home, and to watch where they step.

(A: This is what the signs say.)

“Leave no footprints behind.

(A: No kidding.)

Walk in water where footprints
wash away,”

(A: I’m not kidding you. These were put up by
the federal officials. Maybe you should walk on the water, eh?
Maybe the New Agers could do that, all the ones who are really green and
special and closer to their Green Deity.)

Beaches that once welcomed
fisherman to drive up to the water’s edge are also off-limits to the vehicles,
and so is fishing.

These vacation destinations are
all national parks that once encouraged such recreational uses and enjoyment
but their new “no trespassing” attitudes have angered the local communities,
and some in Congress as well.

Well, the
ones in Congress will get over it, you know. I think everyone holds out
in politics until the right kind of amount of bribe comes along, and that’s
just how it works. Because it’s mainly psychopathic types who go into
politics, to start with. So, there you go. They’re getting what
they want along the beaches. Plus, Homeland Security is in charge of all the
beaches now anyway. They took all that over as well. Because, you
see, there’s just terrorism out there. Whole armies are coming across in
submarines to America. You see them every day, don’t you? Don’t
you? Yeah. They just want to take America over.

And now, if
it was not bad enough now, with the super GM crops that produce their own
pesticides, plus can get poured on with their own super chemicals, heavy, heavy
duty chemicals to kill weeds without killing off the crops,

New GM Crops Could Make Superweeds
Even Stronger

Herbicide-resistant superweeds
threaten to overgrow U.S. fields, so agriculture companies have genetically
engineered a new generation of plants to withstand heavy doses of multiple,
extra-toxic weed-killing chemicals.

It’s a more intensive version of
the same approach that made the resistant superweeds such a problem —

(A: In the first place.)

and some scientists think it will
fuel the evolution of the worst superweeds yet.

These weeds may go a step further
than merely being able to survive one or two or three specific weedkillers. The
intense chemical pressure could cause them to evolve resistance that would
apply to entire classes of chemicals.

Next-generation biotech crops
erupted into controversy with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s ongoing
review of Enlist, a Dow-manufactured corn variety endowed with genes that let
it tolerate high doses of both glyphosate, an industry-standard herbicide
better known as Roundup, and a decades-old herbicide called 2,4-D.

(A: Which is from Agent Orange, basically. And
by the way, the glyphosates basically also are endocrine disruptors. Your
glands are disrupted by them, including the ones that do with your gender.)

Back in the mid-1990s, when
so-called Roundup Ready seed strains first allowed farmers to spray the
herbicide directly onto fields without fear of damaging crops, 2,4-D and other
older chemicals were already falling from favor. They were more toxic and less
effective than glyphosate....

Well, now they’re going much stronger with a different
kind, even worse. Back with more, after this break.

Hi folks, I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix.
Just going through the latest of the craziness of the world. But, again,
it’s crazy like a fox. It knows exactly where it’s going, because it’s
all planned that way by the big boys at the top. And it’s up to you to
get all ready for it as well, and try to get out of the way of things,
especially if you can get into the country, and even look into areas before you
move into them, to see if they’ve got anything planned for that particular
area. Go into the council offices, and even their archives, and see
what’s planned before you get a little plot of land, before you do so.
Because, eventually, you now what’s coming down the pike.

Now, we’ll go to Larry in North Carolina, if you’re still
hanging on there, Larry.

Larry: Yeah, I’m here, Alan. I appreciate everything you’re doing, and I really want to ask
you a specific question. What do you think about people that are working
on solutions to these problems?

Alan: Well, who is working to towards solutions to the
problems though?

Larry: Well, I mean, a lot of people that disagree with
the way things are going right now are thinking about how to solve some of this
stuff.

Alan: The problem is, again, you see, you understand, in
the system of control, number one, they tell us what the problems are by
announcing things, so we come to the conclusion, this is going to be a
problem. What people never start on, is wait a minute here, how can you
change anything when you’ve had the same people running your corrupt banking system
for hundreds of years. It’s got to start there. No one wants to
touch that. No one wants to touch that. In fact, even Professor
Quigley said that the whole power of this system and this coming system that
they’re putting in, back in the 60s, he said this, revolved around their
central banking network, across the world. So, until this private system
of debt, etc, and money and so on, all the cons with it, is put back into where
it’s supposed to be, government, and even then you’d have to have citizens’
panels that are going in, in rotation, watching these characters, the new
characters overseeing it, because they become corrupt too, very quickly.
It’s going to go back to what it was. So, until you start with that,
nothing is going to change. No country today should be in the mess it’s
in financially. They use debt like a weapon, you see. And then they
say, oh, my God, we’ve got to change it. So, what’s the answer?
Agenda 21. Communism across the world, for all you people, while at the
top you have this fascist, wealthy elite running the whole show. We
cannot go along their path. We’ve got to literally go along our own path
and get rid of this bogus financial system that’s based on debt.

And when you cannot save up and even have your home paid
off, without government coming in if you can’t pay taxes and kicking you out of
it, stealing your home, you don’t have any freedoms at all. You’ve got to
start with your basic rights. And if you’ve had them before, you reclaim
them; if you haven’t had them at all, then you create new ones, basic rights,
because it’s quite easy to see what your basic rights should be. Your
property should not be liened upon by anyone when it’s owned outright by
you. It doesn’t matter what government comes in or changes a law, they
cannot do that. We have as much right to live on the land, or anywhere
else, as any animal out there. They don’t get taxed for going where
they’re going, etc. And we cannot allow ourselves to have experts and
scientists with all their pretended theories running our lives for us
anymore. This is all the techniques that’s been used to control us, along
the planned agenda, you understand. But you’re right. But really,
there’s not enough real people trying to come forward with solutions. But
the solutions are very simple. Start with the banking system. No
country should be in debt. No country should be in austerity, at
all. Except for the stinking banking system. That’s how it’s all
based. Greed. And it will always foster greed when you have the
guys at the top manipulate it, and then crashing them every so often.
Twice a century they crash the banks, and steal from you, and they don’t change
the rules, because the same banks own the legal systems. That’s how you
should start with it all across the world. That’s the start of
everything. From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s good
night, and may your god or your gods go with you.