The fight for freedom, democracy and prosperity is a shared battle in an inter-dependent and hyper connected world.
For now, we are focused on Venezuela, but we do look far and beyond for perspective and lessons.
My thanks to the publications, authors and individuals whose writings or deeds have inspired many of my comments. Without them it would not be as fun to write and post.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

The Lt. Colonel in Dictatorial Pose (and costume), the medalsare for the two failed coups he participated in.

PMBComment: Bernd Debusman, from Reuters, in his obvious quest to understand and explicate the Bolivarian phenomenon, reaches out to one of the foremost experts on leadership “disorders” Dr. Jerrold Post of GeorgeWashingtonUniversity. For decades Dr. Post has analyzed the pathologies of both moderately unhinged leaders and extremely perturbed ones. Reading his seminal work on the subject: “Leaders and their Followers in a Dangerous World” it is evident that Hugo Chávez (not yet a subject at the time it was published) is not unique, is not the first and will not be the last leader to convert extreme insecurities into malignant tendencies.

One of the hardest things for political analysts to ascertain is when their subjects leave the wrinkles of politics and submerge themselves in the unfathomable waters of psychiatry. Accepting that Stalin, Hitler, Marcos, Honecker, Milosevic, Amin Dada, Saddam, Kim Jong Il – to name but a few - where madmen first and politicians second took some time and many lives.

Recent events have finally led many to understand that the leader of the Bolivarian “revolution”, if not yet in the murderous ranks of the rouge’s gallery above, has little, or no, regard for the lives and the livelihood of the citizenry he has taken hostage. The violence that defines his misrule is nothing to scoff about. Those who choose to ignore it, in the interest of political or financial gain, share a degree of responsibility for the dire consequences.

How this tragedy ends is anyone’s guess, but for sure Mr. Chávez will not escape the fate of the above thugs, nor will Venezuela recover easily from the traumatic experience. PMB

Venezuela's Chavez seen wanting office "for life"

Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:14PM EDT

By Bernd Debusmann, Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Insecurity, "malignant narcissism" and the need for adulation are driving Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's confrontation with the United States, according to a new psychological profile.

Eventually, these personality traits are likely to compel Chavez to declare himself Venezuela's president for life, said Dr. Jerrold Post, who has just completed the profile for the U.S. Air Force.

Chavez won elections for a third term last December. Since then he has stepped up his anti-American rhetoric, vowed to accelerate a march towards "21st Century socialism" and suggested that he intends to stay in power until 2021 -- a decade beyond his present term.

But Post -- who profiled foreign leaders in a 21-year career at the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and now is the director of the Political Psychology Program at GeorgeWashingtonUniversity -- doubts that Chavez plans to step down even then. "He views himself as a savior, as the very embodiment of Venezuela," Post said in an interview.

"He has been acting increasingly messianic and so he is likely to either get the constitution rewritten to allow for additional terms or eventually declare himself president-for-life."

Post portrays Chavez as "a masterful political gamesman" who knows that his popularity largely rests on being seen as a strong leader who takes on the United States, the Venezuelan elite and a host of other perceived enemies -- often with public insults that are rarely used by other leaders.

Even Chavez's most determined opponents concede that he is a gifted orator and has a rare ability to mesmerize audiences. In the language of political psychology, this is a "charismatic leader-follower relationship."

DONKEYS, THIEVES AND CRYBABIES

Chavez has called U.S. President George W. Bush a "donkey," U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice an "illiterate," former Mexican President Vicente Fox a "lapdog of imperialism" and Peruvian President Alan Garcia a "rotten thief" and a "crybaby."

Jose Miguel Insulza, the Secretary General of the Organization of American States, attracted the public label "asshole" (as did Bush), and Chavez described the entire Brazilian Congress as "puppets."

"The major psychological reward for Chavez derives from being seen as the pugnacious openly defiant champion of the little man, as one of 'us' versus 'them,'" Post said.

In his assessment, one of the character traits that drive Chavez is "malignant narcissism," a term that denotes an extreme sense of self-importance and is usually coupled with extreme sensitivity to criticism.

"The arrogant certainty conveyed in his (Chavez's) public pronouncements is very appealing to his followers. But under this grandiose facade, as is typical with narcissistic personalities, is extreme insecurity," Post wrote in his profile "The Chavez Phenomenon" for the U.S Air Force.

Chavez's supporters dismiss such criticism as U.S. efforts to discredit a popular president. Chavez himself has repeatedly said Washington was engaged in psychological, political, economic and media warfare against him.

And yet, only last month, the Venezuelan government refused to renew the broadcast license of TV and radio network RCTV, the loudest voice against Chavez, highlighting his sensitivity to criticism.

His description of the Brazilian Congress as "puppets" came in response to a statement expressing concern for the freedom of expression after RCTV's closure. Chavez was so angry about a similar remark by the Spanish foreign minister, Miguel Angel Moratinos, that he said he would "take distance" from Spain.

"There are two circumstances when Chavez's messianic personality adversely affects his decision making, with a potential for flawed judgment," Post wrote in his study for the Air Force. "When he has just achieved a major success and when he perceives himself as failing."

That pattern has been consistent throughout his presidential terms -- bold actions when he felt heady with success; harsh rhetoric, confrontational moves and temporary depression when he felt weakened.

In the heady wake of his electoral triumph last December (he won 63 percent of the vote) Chavez nationalized the country's largest telecommunications company and its most important private electricity firm, as well as silencing RCTV.

But in the wake of one of his worst diplomatic defeats, the failure of a protracted and cHostly lobbying campaign to win a seat for Venezuela on the United Nations Security Council, Chavez was so despondent that he stayed away from an Ibero-American summit meeting in Uruguay. "My colleagues don't like me," he complained.

In Post's analysis, Chavez's flawed judgment was on display with his speech to the U.N. last September, when he called Bush "the devil" who had left a smell of sulphur in the assembly hall. Chavez's speech drew chuckles and applause -- but it lost him the U.N. Security Council seat that he had coveted.