Tuesday, 21 February 2012

Deceit and manipulation

Back here I wrote about how the Chicago Tribune mislead its readers in a way that would have made an old Pravda editor proud. I was referring to the way they portrayed mug shots of the city's leading criminals. Here's what I said then.

Well, this electronic rag, working on the assumption that most readers will look up only the first dozen or so, lumps all the whites into that very space. The dirty manipulative conniving bastards. And it gets better. As a teaser they show a couple of mug shots on the main page. And guess what? Yes - they're invariably white. I tell you, the degree of manipulation and mind control the MSM are subjecting us to is just beyond belief.

Now we can expect this from so-called liberal slimesheets like the Tribune. But you'd expect something different from Fox News. Or would you?

Well, no actually. They're at the same trick, just not quite as blatantly misleading. In this instance I checked out the first 25 mug shots. Eight of them were white (32%). Yet four of the first five (and five of the first six) were white. 80%!

Again, the thinking here will be that the vast bulk of readers won't go beyond the first one (inevitably white) or else the first half dozen or so. Hence the front-loading of whites by the presstitutes in Fox.

48 comments:

Anonymous
said...

yrs and yrs back when the irish 1st came to chicago the Tribune which once was the bastion of conservatism in a wasp majority had a reporter write the following, ;if you scratch the hide of any criminal in the county jail you can be almost sure that he is a irish catholic;can you imagine saying today that it would be a nigger heathen,john old rtd chicago copper.

Whites are not without blame in all this. We are complicit in our own destruction, albeit in the context of the culture destroyers who control the media.

In this case, an undercover CEO finds out a Negro manager is abusive to staff, even assaulting them. Result? Imprisonment? Charges? No. CEO blames himself for not giving the poor Negro enough training.

Apparently Negroes require extensive training in order not to physically abuse people.

Well, this made my day ... in fact it's made my weekend and it's only Tuesday.

http://cofcc.org/page/2/

“Anti-racist” gangbangers brutally attacked by Kurdish immigrants.

Members of violent "anti-racist" gang brutally beaten by Kurds for being white.

A vicious Marxist gang known as “Antifa” has staged violence attacks all over Europe. The group calls itself “anti-racist” and targets members of right-wing groups. Members of the gang routinely cross national borders to commit violent assaults. One of the ongoing projects of the gang in Germany is to vandalize Thor Steinar clothing stores. The group claims that the Arab-owned clothing line caters to “Nazis” by putting Viking/Norse imagery on some of their t-shirts.

However, a group of Antifa gangbangers got some poetic justice when a mob of Kurdish immigrants stormed their Berlin gang house and brutally beat members with baseball bats. The attack occurred just days ago. The Kurdish immigrants simply wanted to attack some white people, any white people.

Members of “Antifa” have a gang headquarters called “Hausprojekt Scherer 8″ in an immigrant ghetto in Berlin. Across the street from the Antifa gang house is home base for a violent Kurdish drug gang called the “Street Fighters.”

The Kurdish gang demanded protection money from the Antifa gang. They refused. The Kurds waited for the Antifa gang to thro{w) a big party. Then 30 members of the Kurdish gang stormed the Antifa house wielding baseball bats and began brutally beating them. The Kurds also smash(ed) windows and destroyed furniture and a bar.

Looks like the charge of "breathing while white" sort of backfired.

That's me snorting and smirking for the next few days. Sometimes it's good to take pleasure in the little things.

More than once over the years I have been told by this or that media smuggie "Sorry; like it or lump it. We just report it, we do not make up the news" and many a time I have marvelled at this blatant lie.Into a news office there is a quotidien and continual flow of news; this is the raw material, as it were.A decision must now be made; what to publish, what to discard. So what happens when that decision is routinely made in accord with and in the furtherance of a very far reaching agenda? Rhetorical question, that.Now; the selection made, the item must now be burnished and toned so as a) to further and enhance that agenda and b) so as to be endowed with a spurious air of objectivity. Only now does it become fit to print; and still the little bastard sits there with his/her patronising smirk and the mantra "We don't make it up....etc". A couple of simple schoolroom examples for you; way back, Adlai Stevenson would "spout about" matters, whereas Eisenhower "dwelled upon" them. And again, a political movement might "swing" to the left but would be held to have "lurched" to the right. Pick up on that and after a while, knowing what to look for, you will start to cotton on to the game.

John, this was true at the time. But like all the other white nationalities we overcame that and became as productive as any other citizens. Blacks never have and never will. You can take the chimp from the jungle but not the jungle from the chimp.

John Swinton, an American journalist in the late 1800's on freedom of the press:

" There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it.

There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.

The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?

We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."

Anyone remember a case in Dublin some years back; girl gone missing, where she go what happened her? Girl was a somewhat retarded lassie from out of town, but able to make the trip to the therapy center in Dublin regularly. Some days later she was found distressed and disorientated wandering around, press had a field day. She had been abducted, held in a house somewhere, gangbanged by a bunch of guys over several days until, tired of it, they turfed her out on the street to fend for herself as best she might. Oh, horror!! crooned the media for days on end with but one outraged voice, the perps must be found and punished....well they were found. To the MSM's chagrin they did not turn out to be the hoped-for Catholic priests (you can imagine the decade-long furore if they had been)who the MSM were anticipating; oh no, they were a bunch of tinted chaps from below the Sahel. Do you know, from that moment on not one word about any of this ever appeared in the media again. It was as though it had never happened. If pushed hard enough the MSM might have said that it would not have been in the public interest to publish this; well, why exactly would it not? Didn't they use to call this censorship in more honest times?

The DM has indeed become a major success and due undoubtedly in conisderable part to it showing people in their true colors. But the 'journalists' are still libtards. Spot difference between them and the commentators.

The DM has indeed become a major success and due undoubtedly in conisderable part to it showing people in their true colors. But the 'journalists' are still libtards. Spot difference between them and the commentators.

They came through a system where they were thoroughly brainwashed. I actually know one who is a shining example of that. Like the one I know, I suspect most of them feel like fish out of water, unable to grasp this world which is utterly alien to their belief system. If it makes you feel better (I know it will give UN a kick heh heh) they have an ice cold lump of fear eating them up inside.

UN companies such as blogspot can buy up all of teh domain names carrying their company name blogspot.co.uk, blogspot.com and can then redirect users based on their location , which can be found using your I.P address. This also allows them to taylor - or restrict - content based on your location/country

Thief left disfigured after urine sets off explosion at UK power plant

Thief sets off powerful explosionSubstation being repaired after explosion

A MAN was sentenced to a year in prison for attempting to rob a UK power substation that exploded when he urinated against a transformer.

Michael Harper, 36, was permanently disfigured after suffering serious burns in the blast at the electricity substation under a railway arch in Leicester, central England, The Leicester Mercury said today.

The father of two was left burning on the floor by his accomplice, 50-year-old Richard Boyce, who tried to drive off but later was found by police with blistered hands.**

Considering the propensity of electricity to travel through impure water, our hero's "permanent disfiguration" will ensure that the "father of two" will remain that way.

Rather a fly on the wall than the fly on his trousers.

Equally intriguing is our "50-year-old Richard Boyce, who tried to drive off but later was found by police with blistered hands."One has to wonder just where Mr Boyce's hands actually were at the moment of truth.

Aiming Mr Harper, one assumes?

Somehow, I think the prison showers will hold no terrors for either of them.

UN

PS: **Richard Boyce, who tried to drive off but later was found by police with blistered hands.

Living proof of why newspapers need editors. Was it the police who had blistered hands?

This is a clipped version of a banner ad for “Kingsmill Resort, Williamsburg, Virginia, Suite Escape Package, Starting From Only $359,” that I saw spanning the top of a page at the Weekly Standard’s website. The woman, hand on hip, shoulders thrust back with arrogant pride, the ruler of all she surveys. The man, hunched over before her, subvervient, lacking any dignity, his face level with her belly.

Now advertisements are meant to make a product or service attractive to people. For example, in the New York area for the last year or more there are billboard ads for a certain 4G cellphone (I can’t remember the brand at the moment) that use a pretty, friendly brunette as the model. The brunette has nothing to do with the cellphone; she is there is give prospective customers, or least male customers, a good feeling about the cell phone, to make them want to buy it. The picture of the couple in the ad for Kingsmill Resort is more directly related to the product, but the intent is the same, to make prospective customers want to spend a weekend getaway there. But, in contrast to effect of the pretty brunette, would people really have a good feeling about a picture of a woman standing regally over a pathetic, hunched-over man? How many couples would be attracted by that image, and thus want to go to Kingsmill? Would’t even PC, liberal, feminized men and women—the Beltway lawyers and bureaucrats at whom the ad is directed—be at least subconsciously repelled? I don’t know. I ask your thoughts.

I do not fully trust Mr Auster, but he often asks the right questions. Odd that he should ask this one at this time. I cannot help but wonder if he is not a sometime lurker on this site.

It wouldn't much matter to me. IMO, society is led by men -- or should be (I know and have known many fine women, but I cannot, and have no desire to, see them as 'leaders', albeit I don't need or want much 'leading' myself). As such no man should be having sex with an 11 y/o girl, regardless (i.e. 'willing' or not, which is legally impossible anyway, since she had not reached the age of consent -- moronic judge). It's digusting, predatory behavior -- exactly the opposite of what a man's responsibilities to a child are (or should be). Reminds me of the minor sensation caused not too long ago by the fotos of polar bear cannabilism.

The U.S. Government: An insurance conglomerate protected by a large, standing army

American politics is one long argument about what government should or shouldn’t be doing, and how it should or shouldn’t be doing it. It’s rare that we step back, take in the larger picture and ask what it is doing. The release of the president’s proposed 2012 budget is a good time to do that. If you want to know what the federal government is really doing, just look where it’s spending our money.

Two of every five dollars goes to Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid, all of which provide some form of insurance. A bit more than a buck goes to the military. Then there’s a $1.50 or so for assorted other programs -- education, infrastructure, environmental protection, farm subsidies, etc. Some of that, like unemployment checks and food stamps, is also best understood insurance spending. And then there’s another 40 cents of debt repayment. Calvin Coolidge once said that the business of America is business. Well, the business of the American government is insurance. Literally. If you look at how the federal government spends our money, it’s an insurance conglomerate protected by a large, standing army.

But you wouldn’t know it to listen to the debate over the budget. When House Republicans talk about cutting spending and the Obama administration talks about freezing spending, neither group is talking about the vast expanse of the government’s commitments. They’re looking at a small corner of the budget, the 12.3 percent known as non-defense discretionary spending. The stuff that’s not Medicare, not Medicaid, not Social Security or the military. It’s the odds-and-ends, so to speak.

Hi M, your query; I do not have hands-on experience of how the presstitutes actually work, but I would be surprised if they talked openly about how they do things, even among each other. I think it begins in the schoolroom; the hearties become Tories, you see; the swots gravitate into Intelligence; the resentful fat boys with notes from matron seem to take one or other of two routes. Either they go in for left wing politics in hopes of avenging themselves, although they will call it "social justice" (did someone else say this recently here) OR they will go, especially the class sneaks among them, into the meedja.So you don't see an overt conspiracy at work; but you do see generation after generation of ambitious malcontents sharing a mindset, coming of age, getting their dreadful black claws on the word processors; it is by their works that ye shall know them, d'you see.

The hacking scandal is reported that Moron, who convienently placed the label of the bottle of the American Idol sponsor or whatever the "talent" show that he is a judge of facing the camera at the Leveson committee, is being asked about his time as Bizarre editor at The Sun and Showbiz editor of the News of the World but not about his time as editor of the Mirror where they obtained the Sven Goran Ericsson Ulrike Jonnsson story by listening to their mobile phone messages nor that he played a Paul McCartney message to the newsroom when they obtained knowledge of the break up.

He was obviously a bad wickle boy at the Murdoch papers but an outstanding citizen of utmost probiety at the Mirror.

New Zealand is a complete fascination to me. Sometimes the place drives me fucking nuts.

But sometimes ...

http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/

Only Labour could complain about axing bureaucrats

by Whaleoil on February 24, 2012

Murray McCully is cutting the bloat out of MFaT:

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) has confirmed it is cutting around 300 staff as Finance Minister Bill English says it’s crunch time for the public sector.

MFAT’s chief executive John Allen this afternoon said it would be cutting 305 staff.

The news came as English said Kiwis were about to see the public service change.

English said the Government had last year told public sector chief executives to look at their own operations and ”tell us how they could be improved to deliver better services with little or no new money”.

”We gave them time to do that. We’re now at that point. That means we’ll see quite a change in how public services are delivered.”

Allen said 600 MFAT staff would have to reapply for their jobs in new specialist roles. The ministry has 1340 staff, half of which are offshore

He also confirmed changes to remuneration including offshore allowances. Staff would be asked to make a “nominal contribution” to their living costs overseas.

Only Labour could complain about axing bureaucrats:

If the National govt. keep up like this, we may be first out of the recession.

Better keep quiet about it or someone will start a non-Rothschild bank, and then the US will bomb the shit out of Wellington.