But he'll still crow about how he's concerned with truth, when every objective observer will see that is not the case.

If Dave had actual evidential arguments for any of his numerology or pseudoscience that were based in reality, and not a buffet of logical fallacies, they would cease to have those names and move into the mainstream.

Dave's all claim and belief. He skips over the objective evidence part, and when challenged, begins his rapid franoogling procedure looking for absolutely anything that might tangentially support his point, which it inevitably doesn't. And he doesn't care it doesn't because of his combination of shitty reading skills and abysmal reasoning.

Like I said, all claim and belief. All hat and no beef. All shitty hands and holy teeth.

Who even made the rule that we cannot group ducks and fish together for the simple reason that they are both aquatic? If I want to group them that way and it serves my purpose then I can jolly well do it however I want to and it is still a nested hierarchy and you can't tell me that it's not.