"Within the context of the immediate discussion, there wasn't a lot of talk of what Congress itself could do. This was more in the place of oversight, and is the executive branch doing what they need to do to keep us from breaches of national implication," he said. "When we look at CSIA, the critical next step is to pass a federal law that will provide uniform protection for sensitive information and sensitive infrastructure."

Asked if there was a prevalent attitude among congressmen on DHS's level of preparedness, Kurtz told SCMagazine.com today. "I think there was one of disappointment, at least on the Republican side, and one of more than that on the Democratic side, they were very disappointed."

Vincent Weafer, senior director of security response for Symantec, testified before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, telling legislators that "the threats to our critical infrastructure are real and, without a doubt, growing."

"The question is not ‘if' or even ‘when will be attacked?' but should be, ‘How severe will the attack be?'" he said in .

Weaver outlined a number of growing threats, including breaches affecting the personal information of 52 million Americans and the ability of hackers to cause stock price losses of 1 to 5 percent in the days after a cyberattack.

These attacks have had a considerable negative effect on consumer confidence, Weafer said, adding that a recent CSIA study showed 32 percent of respondents strongly believed their financial information could get stolen online, while a poll from The Conference Board revealed that 41 percent of respondents are purchasing less online.

"But more damaging than the loss of money is the loss of trust and confidence by consumers in the internet economy," he said. "We can't risk losing the public's trust in online ecommerce, but we are."