January 27, 2011

How education is infected by bureaucracy: We need a new culture of learning

President Obama's call in the State of the Union address for young people to enter the teaching profession was noble, but hollow. As one teacher, Vern Williams, wrote in the New York Times:

When President Obama suggested last night that current students should strongly consider becoming a teacher, I felt both pride and sorrow for our profession. I know many outstanding teachers who love teaching and learning but have been forced to abandon their creative and successful teaching methods because of the current obsession with “best practices” research, which demands that all teachers in a department, school, or even a school district deliver lessons in precisely the same way so that no student ends up in a classroom where the teacher is really bad or really good. Average teaching is considered fine as long as it is fairly distributed.

Such bureaucratic practices are precisely what are causing the decline in effectiveness of US corporations. It is ironic that at the very moment that the education sector is embracing bureaucratic methods of management at the very moment when private sector industry is abandoning them.

It is even more ironic that just at the moment well-intentioned American reformers are embracing a regimented, harshly competitive, test-heavy approach that they admire in China, Chinese education leaders are rethinking their approach, as shown in this interview with education professor Yong Zhao: http://audio.edtechlive.com/foe/yongzhao2011.mp3.

Moreover the total focus on test scores means that we increasingly have a system that teaches children how to pass tests, not a system that inspires a life-long love of learning or equips them for the multiple careers they will have to master in the workplace.

This recalls Peter Drucker's saying, of which Professor Ian McCarthy of Simon Fraser University, reminded us this week: “When a subject becomes totally obsolete we make it a required course.”

The last straw is the derisory pay that teachers are offered at a time when occupations of little social worth are offered obscenely high compensation for no apparent reason other than that they are in a position to extract rents.

If President Obama wants genuine excellence in education, he would do well to read A New Culture of Learning: Cultivating the Imagination for a World of Constant Change by Douglas Thomas and John Seely Brown (2010). We need to understand, as this book shows, schools can prosper under the most difficult conditions, provided that they grasp that questions are more important than answers and that learning is no longer static and discrete but continuous.

I completely agree with the bureaucratic nature of education. Even though your post focuses predominantly on US education, I can say that this plague has also affected Australian education as well.

Too much of a focus on numbers and scores and not enough focus on practicality and "in-the-trenches" experience is what is crippling our future leaders.

I mean, take the PMP Certification test for project managers. I've been documenting what I've been learning about it at my website http://pmpcertificationonline.org and realized that there have been claims from industry thought leaders that it's overrated due to its focus of theoretical knowledge fortified with management jargon that you would never use in real life.

But in a sign of the possible danger ahead, the poll found that Cain slipped to third place among those who see the accusations as serious, and Republican women were significantly more likely than men to say the allegations make them less apt to support the businessman.