Some more re-recordings. The previous ones from 2009 were not really bad, but I felt Liadov deserved better - especially since Hye-Jin and David also discovered this endearing composer. Also, the new strings and new recorder do provide a much richer sound (as does the playing IMHO)

Work has been very demanding, so it is great to have some time to listen again.

Morceaux No.1 Very beautiful tactic of having the last note of each melodic phrase hang over the left hand acoompaniment. This created quite an engaging interpretation. Gorgeous tapering off throughout the right hand decrescendo passage. Impressive sensitivity throughout. Very beautiful expression of the left hand repeated intervals, assertive and yet melodic. Bravissimo!

Morceaux No.2 This piece is very interesting and sounds folk like. The embellishments are nicely done, crisp and well mastered in the Mazurka style. Just a suggestion, perhaps a bit less pedal in the opening.

Morceaux No.3 The pedaling is well done, allowing the beautiful twists and turns throughout to be easily identified with the gorgeous interplay between melody and harmony ringing through. Very story like playing. The fusion of styles, folk like and romantic are beautifully woven. Thanks for sharing.

But sorry to be picky but in general I think you could exploit a more soft sound.Especially in the LH in the prelude. I feel you have mp - f dynamics downbut could use more exploration in the pp - mp areas. Anyway, this isjust my minor comments, I'm so privileged just to be able to hear somany pieces. Thanks for all your hard work.

You're right. Playing gradations of p, pp and ppp is the hardest thing there is, and I'm not doing such a good job of it. Partly to blame on the piano having a ratner heavy and uneven action, and partly on the recording flattening out dynamics. This Prelude is extremely difficult in that respect, with the wide-spaced double-note LH accompaniment carrying more than 4 times the amount of notes as the RH.

Many (no one intended here) think there are only two positions for the una corda (soft) pedal: none and shifted all the way. This is not the case. The sound is modulated when the strings are struck by any other of those two extremes too. Often you can get interesting sounds by striking the string not with the valleys on the hammer (no pedal) but on the incline of the felt (slightest shift of the action), or on the crest of one of the shoulders on either side of each string. Repeated use of the soft pedal to it's extreme position begins to create a new valley there over time. One shold explore these nuances. I use this often to try and tone down the extreme brightness of my piano.

Edit: This of course only applies to grand pianos, not uprights.

_________________Eddy M. del Rio, MD"A smattering will not do. They must know all the keys, major and minor, and they must literally 'know them backwards.'" - Josef Lhevinne

I completely agree with you. The soft pedal can indeed assist in achieving very quiet dynamics, but it can also serve to change the timbre of the sound. When the soft pedal totally shifts the hammers to the right, over time the strings, which have already grooved the hammers at rest position (when the soft pedal is not in use), will likewise groove the hammers while the soft pedal is in fully shifted position. So there can then be two sets of grooves on the hammer, whereby the soft pedal ultimately become ineffective in quieting volume or achieving a different timbre during full shifting of the mechanism. Many pianists have found that to be the case in concert halls, but with quick experimentation have found soft felt elsewhere on the hammers and used it to good effect by simply depressing the soft pedal to a lesser depth. It's just as easy to do this maneuver at home. Of course, at some point hammer voicing will be required to refurbish the striking surfaces. In the meantime, the hammer grooves can also be brushed with a brass brush to eliminate metalic residue from the strings, but that is a only a temporary remedial solution at best.

David

_________________"Interpreting music means exploring the promise of the potential of possibilities." David April

Hi Chris,that´s overall a very nice playing. I have enjoyed it very much. Most passages seem very well elaborated to me. I agree also to the lack of differenciation between the p-pp-ppp grades, but there also are many very nice dynamic moments in your interpretations. So, bravo to that very good job!

Thanks for the praise Andreas. I do my best with dynamics, but shades of pianissimo are just not possible on my instrument with its heavy and rather uneven action, without the risk od dropping notes or uneven playing. Unless resorting to una corda, which I don't like because it deadens the tone. Of course now we'll get a whole discussion about due corde, 2.718281828459 corde, and finding a bit of as yet unused felt on the hammers, etc.... but my foot is not that subtle

Of course now we'll get a whole discussion about due corde, 2.718281828459 corde, and finding a bit of as yet unused felt on the hammers, etc.... but my foot is not that subtle

Well, there are two philosophies among the pianists, I think. One side says, a ppp should never be played with una corda, only if the composers prescribes una corda. A good pianists should be able to differenciate among p-pp-ppp without una corda. The other side says, it´s a legal matter to use the left pedal also for differenciation of the piano-grades. I´m just counting myself to that last group. But, of course, you need an instrument it is possible to realize that and last but not least that´s a pure matter of taste, isn´t it?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum