I love people who clicked a thread entitled 'Really unhealthy Freddie' and then clicked a link to what they must have assumed showed a really unhealthy Freddie, are suddenly morally outraged at the idea that someone would post a picture of a really unhealthy Freddie.

People who look at a car crash are sick aren't they...especially if they block your view.

Phony outrage. Fantastic.

It's similar to people who'll think it's shocking about paparazzi pictures that invade people's privacy yet rush out to buy as many glossy magazines as they can to see them all.

I love people who clicked a thread entitled 'Really unhealthy Freddie' and then clicked a link to what they must have assumed showed a really unhealthy Freddie, are suddenly morally outraged at the idea that someone would post a picture of a really unhealthy Freddie.

People who look at a car crash are sick aren't they...especially if they block your view.

Phony outrage. Fantastic.

It's similar to people who'll think it's shocking about paparazzi pictures that invade people's privacy yet rush out to buy as many glossy magazines as they can to see them all.

Thankyou.

Personally, people's retarded reactions to misleadingly titled jpgs make me want to join in the fun.

I love people who clicked a thread entitled 'Really unhealthy Freddie' and then clicked a link to what they must have assumed showed a really unhealthy Freddie, are suddenly morally outraged at the idea that someone would post a picture of a really unhealthy Freddie.

People who look at a car crash are sick aren't they...especially if they block your view.

Phony outrage. Fantastic.

It's similar to people who'll think it's shocking about paparazzi pictures that invade people's privacy yet rush out to buy as many glossy magazines as they can to see them all.

I love people who clicked a thread entitled 'Really unhealthy Freddie' and then clicked a link to what they must have assumed showed a really unhealthy Freddie, are suddenly morally outraged at the idea that someone would post a picture of a really unhealthy Freddie.

People who look at a car crash are sick aren't they...especially if they block your view.

Phony outrage. Fantastic.

It's similar to people who'll think it's shocking about paparazzi pictures that invade people's privacy yet rush out to buy as many glossy magazines as they can to see them all.

You're so quick to jump to unfounded conclusions and derive theories from them...are you an amateur psychologist, by any chance?

I really don't understand why all you people get so worked up over this cartoon. Really now... it's just a toaster with a Freddie-like moustache and a word pun. I don't see of what relevance is the fact that tomorrow is Freddie's death anniversary to this cartoon.

And atg2001 is totally right. I am a psychologist and I do agree to his point of view. Why did you guys click on the picture in first place if you are outraged by its title?

By the way, what really caused all this outrage? Were you guys so disappointed that you didn't see what you expected, a real picture of a very sick Freddie?... I would be more bothered by being exposed to a picture of that sort than by an irreverentious word pun and a cartoon. But then again, nobody in the world forced you to click on the link... And in the end, why is it so outrageous to be irreverentious to Freddie? You know what? Freddie is not a god and anyone can joke about him and be irreverent to him. It's not a crime. I have a guess that Freddie himself would not be bothered about it as much as you guys do. Please stop with this idolatrous attitude. It's not doing Freddie any good, you know.

To further annoy you, I will paste a very irreverent joke about Freddie that I read a long time ago on this board, before it got hijacked by fundamentalist Freddie worshippers:

Q: What did Freddie Mercury say to the other guys in Queen when they asked him who gave him AIDS? A: "I don't know. They were always behind my back."