Comments on: Nuclear needed to plug energy gaphttp://jonathan.rawle.org/2006/05/19/nuclear-needed-to-plug-energy-gap/
Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:28:52 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.3By: Joseph Siddallhttp://jonathan.rawle.org/2006/05/19/nuclear-needed-to-plug-energy-gap/#comment-5275
Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:41:08 +0000http://jonathan.rawle.org/2006/05/19/nuclear-needed-to-plug-energy-gap/#comment-5275Totally agree, Nuclear has to form part of the energy solution. We just need to really work the waste issues. To be fair, if Petrol had just been invented I doubt we would be allowed to buy or store it. Such a potentially dangerous substance being handled by totally untrained people and stored in un-certified mobile in-use tanks controlled by half-trained idiots would have the legislators foaming at the mouth. All of life is risk; you just need to understand it and handle it sensibly.
]]>By: GreenGOPhttp://jonathan.rawle.org/2006/05/19/nuclear-needed-to-plug-energy-gap/#comment-533
Sun, 21 May 2006 02:20:17 +0000http://jonathan.rawle.org/2006/05/19/nuclear-needed-to-plug-energy-gap/#comment-533There’s no question that nuclear energy must be a part of a total energy strategy. France gets 76% of its power from nuclear – one of the few things it does right. Like Blair, Bush is pushing for new nuclear plants – and has found allies in his former EPA chief and NJ Governor Christie Todd Whitman (a noted green republican) and the former head of Greenpeace.
]]>