There must have been a very smart Italian understood that in accordance with the RuStaG he in fact is German:

The smallest denominator for a League of Nations is the most liberal order of a member in relation to the other members, and this denominator happens to be the German League of Nations from 1871 – 1918 and from 1990 up to date ??? – regarding “status quo ante 1914”. It wouldnt be possible the other way round in accordance to international law.

So who did the European nations join basically? The German League of Neations from 1871!

The European people are yet all managed colonies of a parliamentary political system, with a citizenship (Staatsbürgerschaft), that superimposes their nationality (Staatsangehörigkeit) and birth given rights.
The European people have disempowered themselves through establishing a Constitution where they surrender from their sovereignty and give it to a political jurisdiction. That has never happened in Germany under conditions of freedom, and thus each German is still sovereign, according to international law “status quo ante 1914”.
If these nations now join an alliance in which a member has a freer order , which is build around the Human and not a person as legal entity of the state itself, then what happens regarding international law?

Exactly , the laws of the state with the most liberate order frees the other nations from their colonial status. Thus regarding international law, they have German alliaince/ union membership and possess the imperial citizenship (Reichsangehörigkeit). Thus, they are also German, and this circumstance has alot of benefits, explained later on!

(So I pull out the crude theory that all EU members have immediate imperial citizenship (Reichsangehörigkeit) according to RuStaG and thus in addition to their national ctizenship they are also German – RuStaG §1: “German is the nationalof any federal state(§ §3-32) or who possesses the immediatealliance membership(§ §33-35)” )

The Europeans might not yet know about that circumstance that they will all become German when the EU abandons national citizenship like it is planned, unfortunately, the European Union is overlaid by the continuation and “Gleichschaltung” of the 3rd Reich , and as a result all Europeans will be punished for that by the union of BRICS countries in a 3rd WW.

To avoid that WW3 we only have to reestablish the liberal order, based on the principle of subsidiarity and disempower politicians.

So, what there is not to understand?

The main thing people should realize is they possess the imperial citizenship (Reichsangehörigkeit).

And based on that imperial citizenship (Reichsangehörigkeit) you are defined as German and the German Civil Code / § 1BGB is applicable for you– §1 BGB defines everyone as human with natural given rights from birth on. (Though opposing Human Rights of the UN are in fact part of a system of power/ imperialist order. Those rights are not for humans but for managed legal persons, that in fact gave up their birth given rights to a political system. Do you understand that. Thus Germans dont need human rights, because they defined it themselves already + the German League of Nations doesnt have a political system. Their Reich is based on the subsidiarity principle, that only can establish empowered humans, but not legal persons.)

Now people can claim the StaG certificate if they want to, and get out of the colonial status, get rid of the legal person that they are managed under by the republican system of their state.

Unless they do not want that the German Civil Code applies to them, just restrict it with a rule of law, just as the federal government in Germany itself (installed by the occupying powers as the enemy of the German League of Nations and its free order) does it in Art 7 + Art 10 EGBGB, which doesnt match with the original version. (Legal capacity and name are subject to the law of the state, in the original version that was excluded and legal capacity and the family name is superior to the law of the state. Regarding international law the actual version is null, since there always only is valid the freest order -> identity principle)

The Germans, like all other European People need to learn to understand this situation to be able to free themselves from their colonial status, and to rebuild the EU as an alliance of free nations, and not an alliance of legal persons, that are managed through a corporationlike centralized imperial system.

PS: if people still like to prefer to play republic, especially in Germany, Poland, Russia, and Czechia, well they should do it, but they also should know that republic means disempowerment and war, since it existance. They could have much better possibilities, possibilities that guarantee freedom based on responsibility & subsidiarity. The EU could easily be transfered into a free League of Nations (with the municipalities having the greatest power in the state), for that the Germans layed the foundation stone anno 1871.

“GERMANY ” as of unification treaty from 1990, based on the allied definition:

Shaef Law 53 VII (e)“GERMANY shall mean the area constituting “Das Deutsche Reich” as of 31 December 1937″

Is Prussia a part of Germany, so that East Prussia/ Kaliningrad belongs to Germany? People often discuss this since 1990.

To make it clear, Prussia is an independent sovereign state , and who argues Prussia belongs to Germany provokes war , and makes it easy to argue the opposite , that East Prussia was given up by Germany.
Prussia is an independent multi-ethnic state , a legal entity , neither Germany , Poland nor Russia.

If Germans , Russians and Poles want to continue playing rather Republic and prefer being a play ball of war between Russia and the EU, than instead to revive the legal entity “The Kingdom of Prussia” and thus restore the principle of subsidiarity , so that simultaneously abolish the political jurisdiction of current Republics that only have the task to lead Peoples in the NWO through war, then so be it.

Prussia is probably ethnically more Russian than German , if you look at its origin times. Prussia extended from east to west , and not vice versa. So far away from the core German Peoples.
Better expression may be, a Koenigsberger / Kaliningrader is more Prussian than a Rhinelander .
The origin of Prussia , the German Teutonic Order , where was that ?http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutschordensstaat

That should give everyone a hard time to rethink!

Further, what the russian Republic is trying to suggest here, Kaliningrad Department = 39 ( you could also call it Gau ) , with the 2006 newly introduced coat of arms , is full of horror and cynicism:

They’re fascists , Sadomasos , or who have not heard the bang jet, because Prussia is to be in their best interest, the only possibility to end the political jurisdictions of both the today’s Russia managed by a leadership principle and the BRD / Eurocracy, that both will only lead the people into the NWO through war.
Are people really that stupid and mad, or do they know not any better?

PS: you may send this to certain institutions:“The administration of the russian Republic and the EU are driving the people again into war, if the people dont understand that “a political jurisdiction” can never have jurisdiction over a subject of international law like Prussia. The only way out of this coming war is the “subsidiarity principle” and to abandon the “political jurisdictions” and to restore law according to “status quo antes 1914” – before the never ending war began and from there hold constitutional elections.

This guy analyzes why there wont be a strategic alliance between Germany and Russia, as long as Germany is not a sovereign state/ under control of western allies.

The point is, what he keeps quiet about:

There has never been in history a sovereign centrally governed Germany/ german Republic , only a sovereign German Empire/ League of Nations from 1871-1918, with 25+1 sovereign states. And he should know this.
So what really is his aim?!

….

Guess what – the bum is a submarine! Russia itself has the power whether Germans will get their sovereignty back or not, and whether in return Russians and Germans will be able to build a strong alliance to finally break the Anglo Saxony hegemony, as instead destroying each other in a third war as it is planned and now conducted.

All Russia has to do, is return the administrationof East Prussia back to theindigenous people – representativeto theprussianKing&GermanEmperorin an officialact, then the administration area the “Federal Republic of Germany” and the EU would be in a very tight spot = checkmate!

But guess who would never do this?! PUTIN!

PS: (The Council of Ministersof the USSR has already explicitly overwritten the Control Council Law No.46(dissolution of Prussia) in 1947)

The Germans really have the power to end most of the haunting in the world right now, because it exists only because of them. They could dissolve the EU and the UN (= The New World Order) at the same time if they would recognize that their home is not the detaining zone BRD/ Weimarer Republik = 3. Reich, which in fact is ruling through the hands of the City of London Europe again.

Shaef Law 53 VII (e)“GERMANY shall mean the area constituting “Das Deutsche Reich” as of 31 December 1937″

And instead could reestablish their own league of nations founded 1871, which is the complete opposite of the EU/NWO ideology.
The first world war had a deep reason, it wasn’t only about economic power.
See §1 BGB is unique in the world. It was introduced 1900. It means that everyone living in the territory of the German Reich and its colonies, has legal capacity from birth on = that is what human rights are all about. (But human rights are not for humans, that’s the funny thing because otherwise we would not need them, the UN member states don’t govern us as humans – only as collateral/ as “persons” that gave up all their birth given rights to a political jurisdiction = corporate lobbyism, and therefore they needed to establish the human rights charta after WWII)

The legal capacity as it is defined in §1BGB, isn’t gifted from the church/ pope, or the state, or other entity above, you have it from birth on. The application of this law was destroyed after WWI until now. Because WWI had a deeper reason than just an economic one. It was not in the British and France interest that German monarchs declared their underlings as free humans, in times when the US in the same year the German Reich was founded in 1871 was reorganized as a corporation (organic act of 1871)/ a colony of the city of London.

The Germans only need to dissolve the conformist “/gleichgeschaltet” Germany back into the 26 german states to stop most of the haunting in the world, and remanage their “league of nation” from bottom to top -> subsidiarity principle and not from top to bottom as its done in a republic, governed by a political jurisdiction.But the brain-washed Germans need help from abroad, because everything before 1945 is taught to be evil – that what they are taught under the allies established education and media system.
———————-

Since the EUR transformed the EUR zone into a internal market (Binnenmarkt), means that the one that expand can only do that on the cost of the others, means their economy has to shrink.

Means, germany is expanding on the cost of the EUR group (but this for sure isnt going on forever), and now its politicians blackmail the other countries (that have lost their sovereignity over their currency) to extort their citizenz for their econimc losses causing the balance sheet imbalance, that basically has caused germany in first place.Cause as said its like a zero-sum-game in the euro zone. The balance sheet surplus are the balance sheet losses of the others + the EUR is the continuation of the strongest currency of the EUR group = DM, and others have no influence on that. And germany is forcing all the structual constraint to the extent!—————-

And this all was known 20 years before. MTT economists analysed.

hint: one should google Walter Hallstein. And then you will know what the EU is about, and what its intention really is. Its not the union of the nations, its more like the continuation of GG Art133 spread over whole europe.

You didn’t vote for a Europe shaped by the european people – non of us did, you voted for the “united economic territory of Europe”, shaped by corporations.
Thats a huge difference. I didn’t vote for it, nor am i proud of it.
People were just fooled to think it would be the Europe of the nations/ people.
Where is the difference between officials/ public servants and a service employee?
E.g. when i ask a german police officer for his legitimation as a civil servant for his official ID, he doesn’t have one anymore since 1990. He just has an ID Card as a public employee.
This is not a civil servant anymore in the true sense.
E.g. what does it mean when German code on court constitution looses its article where it is defined that all courts have to be State/ Crown courts, and that private courts and courts of arbitration are disbanded ( Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz GVG §15 http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gvg/__15.html )

This is the expression that the constitutional status of the state has changed.
further on:
What does it mean when government entities suddenly have a tax id? (in Germany since 1990, in the UK since 1993..)
What does it mean when government entities are listed here in the world-wide biggest database for companies?http://www.dnb.com/15166033.html?q

It means the EU is organized based on private/ commercial law. And the member states are getting converted into that status aswell into a company like status. Tthis way the member states lost their sovereignty to private organizations a trust management in Brussels and not to a League of Nations! Hugh difference! ( the head trust management of privatized states is the UN, their agenda is to privatize the whole world )
Thats the reason why all EU member states now have red passports.

E.g. most important the member states lost their sovereignty to the EURO Group, a company with a copyright on their brand-name. Unions of nations are not organized through private/ commercial law, no that’s not as it was meant to be in first place!http://eurozone.europa.eu/copyright?lang=de

Like the EUR is no legal tender, instead it is a private tender (there is no state liability). If you copy it you will be punished because of copyright infringments and not because of counterfighting.

What was the 3. German Reich? It was a fascist corporativ organization, kind of exile government, financed and empowered by corporations (IG-Farben, Standard Oil, Wall street, City of London…) Same in Italy at that time! What was the 2nd World War? It was economic warfare.
And now the 4. Reich is being continued through the european union conducted by the same institutions that empowered Adolf Hitler and conducted ww2.
The leading corporation of the eu-structure is the eur-group. The fascists always operated from the City of London, and they are still doing it, and again operating through the German government. The EUR = DM no difference, the german regime is conducting the expropriation of the european nations and in last resort expropriate/ destroys itself, as always! Benefiting is the City of London as always.

Now after ww2 the UN was founded, and since then every sovereign state is being converted into a corporation, under the rules of the money system -> under the rules of the City of London.
They are getting converted from a sovereign currency issuer into a dependant currency user – like a private household/ private entity.
The state/ the government now conquers versus all the private households/ companies for the remaining money in the system, and has to make debts to fund its spending like a private household has to….though the private households spendings are always the states deficit….so if the government and private households have to conquer for the money in the system its a paradoxon and will crash the system:http://pragcap.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/mr3.png

————————————————————————————
short money part:
A sovereign currency issuer can create its currency without making any debts as it was about 100 years ago in the 2nd German Reich, the USA and most other States!
A sovereign currency issuer can’t run out of money nor will its spending devaluate the currency, cause a sovereign state always spends through a value creational process. This process will give the currency the value. Not gold not credit/debts/ national wealth give money value. Only labour that benefits the public (means spending on the military budget inflates the currency= destructive spending) gives the exchange-medium value. Look, a stone has no value, it only becomes valuable when it is integrated in something processed through labour – processed into a house that is useful for the public…

If you want, everyone could issue its own currency. When you work for someone you just issue a bill where it says, the owner of this bill is entitled to demand working power from others. (in the kind of value you gave your working power to another one)…This would be optimum, but since this is hard to organize the state issues these bills (currency) through his expenditures into the economy. The banks would have no money at all if the state would not do this what is falsely called deficit spending……
————————————————————————————

See the UNs definition of democracy is globalized free trade and the installment of debt money (Iran, Cuba, Syria, North Korea are the only left sovereign currency issuer in the world that don’t issue currency for debts. Libya was and now isn’t anymore. The first thing that was changed in Libya was the status of the central bank, and to switch Libya from a sovereign currency issuer into a currency user http://www.cnbc.com/id/42308613/Libyan_Rebels_Form_Their_Own_Central_Bank ).

Thus the UN is an installment of corporations not of nations! Thats a huge difference!
They proclaim human rights, but the sad thing is, they are not applicable in states organized based on private law!
You can’t fight human right violations with constitutional/ state law, where court law is based on commercial law/ contract law! You can’t argue with state law when in fact you are dealing with a corporation. State law defines you as natural person. Commercial law defines you as legal/ juridical person/ a corporate entity. Huge difference.
As a legal/ juridical personality/ corporate entity you can’t apply natural law/ human rights. You now have the rights defined as capitis diminutio maximas as a legal personality / private entity, means you are handled as a thing, and a thing has no human rights.
Just have a look in your identity card, all is written in big letters. Check roman law for what this means! Its a fiction of you, its not meant the human Max, it is meant the fictional synonym MAX MUSTERMAN, the private entity that through the id card accepted that the implemented human rights in your constitution is not valid for the private entity MAX MUSTERMAN, since MAX MUSTERMAN the thing/ private entity covers up the human Max Musterman.
That is the reason why a law suit can’t be won with arguments based on human right law!