So, either the cops going after the geeks with the toy gun or the crazy wind was the highlight of the night. Paul had a five foot putt blow out of the basket on #8, that was entertaining. My upshot right before that almost landed behind me. Fun night.

Ish and I are looking for a group that could start about 15-30 min early this week. We have a softball game at 7 at the Bur Juan fields and would like to make it on time. Please let me know on here our hit me up on my cell phone.

So I'll throw this out here and then follow up on Tuesday, so nobody really needs to respond or anything. It's just an FYI.

The league is really small. Eight teams is pretty much the minimum we can get away with, any fewer and the league is on pretty shaky ground. So we need this thing to get bigger.

One of the ways we try to do that is by trying to accommodate people by allowing drop weeks and subs. We basically don't want to turn away people because they can't make a few weeks. We need the players.

On the flip side, allowing subs to play when neither player on a team can make it opens up the issue of fairness. You have a score out there that neither player had anything to do with, and that bothers some players. So you run the risk of upsetting some players because you are trying to be accommodating, and if you end up upsetting them to the point that they quit it defeats the whole point of being accommodating.

So the issue at hand is if we want to change the rule so that in future leagues at least one member of the team has to be present for the score to stand.

This in no way affects the spring league because everybody has followed the rules as they are currently. Nobody did anything wrong. If there is a problem, it's a problem with the rule. If y'all don't like the rule, we will change it for the future. It's your league.

a) Allow a drop week only, no subs.
If you vote for a, should teams 1) be limited to two players or 2) be allowed to consist of three or more registered players who play in a rotation.

b) Allow a drop week, allow a sub only if one registered member of the team is present.
If you vote for b, should teams 1) be limited to two players or 2) be allowed to consist of three or more registered players who play in a rotation.

c) Allow a drop week, allow subs for one or both registered members of the team (current rule.)

d) Allow subs if one registered member of the team is present, no drop week.
If you vote for d, should teams 1) be limited to two players or 2) be allowed to consist of three or more registered players who play in a rotation.

e) Allow subs for one or both registered members of the team, no drop week.

If there is some scenario you can think of that these options don't account for, let me know. I'm basically going to let you guys decide your own fate.

This issue does reflect something that has happened in the spring league, but I want to repeat again that no one needs to defend themselves or point the finger at anyone. Nobody did anything wrong. Everyone has followed the rules that we have. The only question is whether you guys want to change those rules for future leagues.