Andrea James: Keep your “transgender” or any other kids away from this dude

November 18, 2012

James E. Mead/Andrea James

Those who follow trends in gender, and even some casual readers will be well familiar with transgender activist Andrea James. A graduate of men’s-only Wabash College (which describes it’s mission as teaching males “The Gentleman’s Rule”), James E. Mead rode to fame in the genderist community in 1996 after undergoing and championing a series of radical facial cosmetic surgical procedures in an ongoing plastic surgery diary called TS Roadmap. James was the first autosexual genderist man to promote the surgical ideal of inserting a female-looking face on a male skull and body. He helped popularize these surgeries – now known as “facial feminization surgery”- among gendersexual/autogynephillic men. James helped spur the gendersexual trend away from genital surgeries and toward facial surgeries: which help the men who derive stimulation from imagining themselves inhabiting an approximation of a sexualized female body to achieve a “face passing as female” socially (at least on first glance). He paved the way for men to claim facial cosmetic surgery as a form of “sex-reassignment” surgery.

Andrea James is perhaps best known for posting photos of a nine year old girl stolen from a social networking site and captioning the child a “cock-starved exhibitionist”. In response to public outcry James deleted the posts before he was arrested yet later claimed the child “deserved it” because James was angry at the child’s father, sexologist Michael Bailey. You can read about this in the NewYorkTimes article exposing James here: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/21/health/psychology/21gender.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

James still holds some sway in the transgender political movement, largely on the basis of his previous celebrity as a facial surgery diarist, and his political campaign against all psychiatric and medical research into treating gender dysphoria. However his antics as a disreputable activist using unethical tactics and exhibiting poor impulse control are so widely documented (he once held up a graphic of what he called “a greedy Jew” at a seminar where he went on to elucidate on “greedy jew children” as a supposed correlative to male gender stereotypes) that his influence is widely diminished. His last media splash was to promote a video he created called “I Like Big Dicks”. Surprisingly, he was added in 2007 to the Board of Trustees of a marginal group called “Trans Youth Family Allies” which purports to support “transgender children” but became embroiled in controversy when one of it’s graduates and “success stories”, a female teenager and daughter of one of the group’s founders, committed suicide after “treatment”.

James with “female” face on male skull and body after many surgeries

James popped back up this week when long-time transgender activist Denise Manger died of cancer. James was disturbed because Alice Dreger- the woman who exposed his unethical tactics (and his sexualized targeting of a nine-year-old girl) to the New York Times eulogized Denise on her blog. You can read Dreger’s detailed account of Andrea James’ actions here: [PDF] http://www.springerlink.com/content/0753m756162q4236/fulltext.pdf?MUD=MP

Whatever your views, Dreger’s work is critically important and her writings essential.

Sigh. But back to wack-ass Andrea James. Because it is also important to document historically the hideously misogynist attacks and harassment on Dreger by the transgender movement by men like Andrea James. This is history, baby.

What follows are the terms James uses to characterize researcher and medical ethicist Alice Dreger in his post this week on his TG Roadmap site. In a creepy spree of pedophilic prose he characterizes female children who are predated and raped by adult male high school teachers as “needy”. He speculates on female-authored academic work which disagrees with his beliefs as reflective of our “Daddy issues”. Dear lord. This list is a pretty good illustration of how James helped foster a culture of sexist misogynist heterosexual male autosexual transgender activism, and also why he is now considered a marginalized activist among mainstream genderists. Creeps be creepy! Enjoy.

Descriptors presented in order he posted them.

James Mead/Andrea James’ terms for female ethicist Alice Dreger in his latest article:

nuts

not-too-clever

charlatan

gullible

chump

Blinded to the truth by [her] own incompetence.

Highly susceptible to flattery.

Extremely thin-skinned.

Willing to believe anything from anyone who agrees

Willing to believe anything from anyone who disagrees with a perceived enemy.

incompetent

patsy

Dreger is the kind of needy person who loses her virginity to an exploitative high school teacher.

Dreger and her desire to please him seem very similar to her high school behavior

Dreger’s weird fixation with presenting herself as sexually desirable

Dreger is what passes for an academic these days.

clueless hack

incompetent

lazy

blinded by her own histrionic self-righteousness.

tries to stir up old controversies to make a quick buck and get the attention she craves

Daddy was probably a strict disciplinarian, and Dreger found the best way to get attention was to get in trouble.

thrives on feeling persecuted.

keeps picking fights.

can’t get anything done unless she feels persecuted/angry

tries to pick fights with people who threaten her livelihood or veneer of credibility.

incompetent and blinded to the truth

dimwit

easy to exploit

eager to spread misinformation and lies without checking them

a fool

——————————————————————————————–

If you like accident scenes and have time for cray here’s the link to James’ whole speil, er, account:

OH GOOD GOLLY! Looks like James has removed his “apology” to sexologist Bailey’s kids! Oh NOEZZZZZ! Guess I will have to print the (non)apology here. See where James “apologizes” for the “analogy” of POSTING PICTURES OF A NINE YEAR OLD GIRL CAPTIONED WITH “COCK-STARVED EXHIBITIONIST by ACCUSING Bailey of “failing” his “emotional and religious commitment to his family” BY GETTING DIVORCED. HAHAHAHAHA

OHHH MYYYY GODDDDD.

See it here folks. James the “Big Dick” has scrubbed his site. But GenderTrender has your back, yo! Enjoy reading where James blames the children he sexually targeted for their own distress! And blames their Dad for James’ sexual exploitation of them for his sin of dedicating his book to them! Holy SHIT! KEEP ALL KIDS AWAY FROM THIS MAN. Creepy-ass-fuck. This is an insane man.

Andrea James’ non-pology for sexual pedophillic attacks 1 of 2

Andrea James’ nonpology to pedo sexual attacks on Bailey’s children 2 of 2

59 Responses to “Andrea James: Keep your “transgender” or any other kids away from this dude”

She looks more like a woman than most of you fugly manish looking butch lesbians do. I swear if I wasn’t convinced y’all are just evil nasty bullies with nothing better to do with your time then hating on trans folk, I’d think your were just jealous.

First, you are out of your fucking mind if you think he looks even remotely female. All women could spot him a mile away. We are trained to spot a male who’s lurching and lurking, blundering and thundering around our spaces; stick a dress on him and he’s even more noticeable. YIKES!

Secondly, a woman is defined as such because she lacks a Y chromosome. She never ceases to be a woman despite her style choices and appearance. That you bring up looks only shows that you have a superficial view of women and are ignorant of biology. Although the system of biological sex classification is really quite straightforward and simple, it’s probably still too difficult for you to grasp.

Thirdly, no one here is jealous of the monstrosity known as Andrea James. HE is the one imitating women, not the other way around or did you conveniently forget that fact? HE is on female hormones, HE has had surgery to mimic our faces and bodies, HE has changed his name to a recognized female one. HE has taken immense amounts of time and money to look female. It’s always the imitators who are jealous, not the imitated. We are the real women, he is merely a decoy.

Orangutangu, I’m not butch. There is also absolutely no doubt, upon seeing me, that I’m female. So there’s that.

As for being an evil nasty bully….nope. Let me say this: I have zero problem with men who wish to dress as women. Hell, whatever floats your boat, right? They should be allowed to do that without fear of violence.

What I (and several other posters here) protest is male-bodied men bullying their way into areas that are meant to be female-only, such as restrooms and lockerrooms. These men completely dismiss women’s concerns regarding our safety, and also our rights to dignity and privacy. This dismissal is the epitome of arrogance and selfishness. Transwomen don’t wish to use male facilities due to their fear of mens’ reactions, yet we’re somehow expected to just suck it up and not mind the dick at the locker next to us. We here say no to that, for so many good reasons. But when we do, people like you storm in and screech about the supposed rights of “the trans folk” (a term, by the way, that I suspect is meant to conjure up a sort of innocence or niceness about transsexuals that in reality is often simply not there, as they’re way too busy trying to satisfy their own needs – to hell with everyone else). Who’s the bully now?

There is also a marked difference between people who were born and raised as female, and those who “transition to female” (whatever that means) later in life. To have a sixty-year-old male-bodied person claim that after some shots of estrogen that he’s “as female” as I am is ridiculous. And many of them don’t stop there – they rant and rave when born lesbian women don’t wish to sleep with them, they rant and rave when they’re not included in ABSOLUTELY EVERY group geared for women, they rant and rave when they are not everyone’s top priority and the center of attention. The list goes on. Who’s the bully now?

I won’t go along with your delusions. You and your ilk are evil, selfish, narcissistic fetishists. And bullies. Oh yes, bullies. Now go fuck off back to your swamp.

I wanted to preemptively add, “with the exception of true intersex conditions, which are, inherently complex.” Forgot to insert that and I think it’s important to mention, even though studies have shown that the vast majority of trans people don’t have such physical conditions.

Why didn’t I see that? Maybe it was before I found this lovely sanity-saving site. Anyway, I’ll freely admit there’s no way I could do that bullshit Shakespeare – my years of Shakespeare reading are too far behind me to get it down. Kudos on a job well done, Gallus – and your comments were hilarious re: “feels like Shakespeare on the inside”! HA!

Void of the vampire in its blank looking eyes, void and black spots for eyes, creepy crawly males in these dragish get ups, serial killers, creepos, slime crawling preditors…. yuck, he looks so damn ugly, and still they want more surgery. NUTS just plain out there nuts!

Thank you Bev Jo…you all really inspired me to write another poem! I haven’t written one in a while, and this spoke to my soul! And, wow, YES, every time I have seen a serial killer or rapist or pedophile on T.V., in the newspaper, they ALL had eyes like that! Including Charles Manson.

It is not a normal reaction to take photos of someone’s kids and cut the eyes out, post it online, and call someone’s children ‘cock-starved’ or ‘womb-turd’.

Women need safe areas to raise children and should not have to navigate past dangerous men every time their kid has to pee. There is clearly a child endangerment issue, as well as a sexual assault risk, should a woman be caught in a restroom alone with one of these guys that have publicly called someone’s children ‘cock-starved’ and perhaps may view all children that way..

Men are aggressive about sex. Women and women with children do not want to bear the brunt of aggression/violence for these guys with sexual problems.

[…] there was a televised debate whose motion was the title of this piece of writing. Peter Hyndal and Andrea James, both of whom are trans people, spoke in favour of the motion. Bronwyn Winter and John Haldane […]