If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Ole Miss should never have been a 12. And Miami should not be a 2. If Kentucky, Duke or North Carolina win their conference and/or their tourney they are seeded higher than Ole Miss and Miami. A bit of a double standard for the good ole boy network.

Ole Miss should never have been a 12. And Miami should not be a 2. If Kentucky, Duke or North Carolina win their conference and/or their tourney they are seeded higher than Ole Miss and Miami. A bit of a double standard for the good ole boy network.

Are you saying that Miami should be a #1 seed? And if so which #1 seed would you drop down?

Yes I am. Answer this for me first, If Duke or North Carolina had won both the ACC conference AND the ACC conference tourney would they have been a #1 seed? Yes or No

I agree both Duke and North Carolina would have gotten a #1 seed based on who they were, neither Miami or Indiana's names carry the same weight as those two. I say Miami/Indiana were a coin flip, I don't agree that either one of them should have felt slighted by not getting the last spot, three late losses will kill any team not named Duke.

I agree both Duke and North Carolina would have gotten a #1 seed based on who they were, neither Miami or Indiana's names carry the same weight as those two. I say Miami/Indiana were a coin flip, I don't agree that either one of them should have felt slighted by not getting the last spot, three late losses will kill any team not named Duke.

I would say Miami over the Zags. Indiana came out of the toughest conference in basketball. If not the Zags then Kansas.