Washington Mutual Inc. tumbled for a second day in New York trading after Gimme Credit LLC said unsecured creditors were "pulling funds'' from the biggest U.S. savings and loan. Washington Mutual disputed the report.

Gimme Credit analyst Kathleen Shanley cited a decline in federal funds purchased and commercial paper to $75 million from $2 billion at year-end, which Washington Mutual reported this week in its second-quarter results. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase dropped to $214 million from $4.1 billion at the end of 2007, she wrote.

Washington Mutual, known as WaMu, reported a $3.3 billion second-quarter loss on July 23. Rising delinquencies forced the Seattle-based company to boost provisions for bad loans. While WaMu said it has enough capital after raising more than $7 billion earlier this year, Shanley said liquidity remains a concern.

"We won't use the phrase 'run on the bank,' but we would be remiss if we did not observe that many creditors have quietly been pulling funds," wrote Shanley, based in Chicago. Their actions are "presenting an increasing funding challenge," she wrote. Gimme Credit is an independent research firm serving corporate bond investors.

Run On The Bank?

I do not know if there is a run on WaWu or not. What I do know is that if you are reading this and are above the FDIC limit, and you don't immediately do something about it, then you you have no right to complain if WaMu goes under and you lose every penny above the FDIC limit.

Sheila Bair seems proud of saying only 13% of trouble banks fail. However, even if one accepts that number, it makes no economic sense to take risks when there is nothing to gain and everything to lose when one is over the FDIC limit.

AJ Writes: "Someone thinks WM is going under. 35,000 Aug. put contracts traded at the 3 strike today, and 12,000 Sept. PUT contracts at the same strike. Both dwarfed open interest, so they're mostly new positions. This reminds me of activity in Bear Stearns in March."

Credit protection costs on Washington Mutual rose sharply on Friday, a day after an analyst said some creditors reduced their exposure to the largest U.S. savings and loan.

The cost of protecting [$10 million of] Washington Mutual's debt for five years rose to $1.85 million on an upfront basis, plus $500,000 in annual premiums, up from about $1.35 million plus $500,000 annually on Thursday, according to a trader.

Not Just WaMu

By the way, I am not just talking about WaMu here. Any bank whose share price is in the single digits is at extreme risk. Any bank whose share price is under $5 is at risk of imploding overnight. Here is a partial list:

Disclaimer:The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment
advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security
or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this
site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated
with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that
you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your
investment adviser before making any investment decisions.