1) Benghazi was a planned act of aggression and not in ANY way a “demonstration over a YouTube video nobody had ever seen gone horribly wrong.” CBS doesn’t come right out and say it, but that leaves only one option: Barry and Cankles knew about it, right from the start, yet persisted in lying through their teeth over and over and over again.

2) Al-Qaeda had not only planned it, they’d warned us ahead of time, telling us they’d hit the Red Cross, the Brits and Benghazi. They then proceeded to hit the Red Cross, the Brits, and… you know the rest.

3) CIA assets had been told to wait, ignored orders and went in anyway, saved 5 Americans.

That is all known to us, of course, that and then some, but we aren’t the ones getting all of our news from the Big Three. According to them, this suddenly is something that actually happened.

When you start losing the Palace Guard, Obam-bam, you insufferable swine… Open a book if you want to know what happens next.

20 comments

“When you start losing the Palace Guard” – or, is the Palace Guard just providing another diversion that will take up 3 or 4 days of our time while in the meantime, behind two other curtains –

1. From the video below – “There is an ungodly amount of preparedness going on by the United States government for an H7N9 bird flu pandemic. That’s the concerning thing. Our own opinion is the risk is low in 2013 of this occurring but the amount of money and effort they are spending on this is utterly incredible. Just watch our previous videos. They’ve got a new 211 telephone line set up so you can call in and get healthcare and prescriptions for bird flu without going into the hospital. They have upped their capability for the CDC to do live emergency broadcasts from the command center to the whole nation. Their setting out to give every person in the United States two shots of an experimental vaccine that’s laden with adjuvants. They have ordered 600 million syringes for this. It’s just an incredible effort.”

If you have not looked at the videos (WITH links to government website sources) this guy has produced starting in early September now is probably the time to do so. There are about a dozen in which he documented the above and much more. There is no question in my mind this is “the” false flag set-up intended to bring us to our knees and it will be very difficult to combat.

Yesterday I ran 4 miles in the Marine Corps Marathon with a Mom of one of lost warriors in Benghazi. She was almost in tears because she thinks because of the lack of coverage in the news and in the lack of action by this government that no one gives a shit. I told her that there is a nation full of patriots who stand with her, her son and his comrades and will ensure justice be served. I don’t know how we will get that justice served but I am strongly thinking it will entail rope, tree and some assembly required.

watchyerlane @ #:4 – If she only knew. These people have not stopped one day since they set up their website just shortly after her son died. @FrankMDavisJR. @Kathy_Amidon http://benghazi-truth.blogspot.com/ To the best of my knowledge they are still nightly tweeting with their group at Congress. They just do not let up. And bloggers all over this nation post something very, very, often.

We have not forgotten Benghazi and those who died there. We have not forgotten their parents and loved ones. We will NOT forget.
Nor will we forget those responsible. As you said – rope, tree…….

Misha this is nothing other than Battle Space Preparation by the MBM for their Queen Shrillary for 2016. They will bring this up now and the Senate and House DemProgs wil stall stall and stall some more until the news cycle becomes old!

Thus in 2016 when the Republicans bring this up in 2016 it can be declared “Old News” by the solons on the selfsame MBM!

The best thing we can do is “DO NOT LET IT DIE”, keep dragging up some small point that keeps it New News until the crunch!

U.S. President Barack Obama walks out to deliver remarks alongside Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, October 1, 2013.

President Obama repeatedly assured Americans that after the Affordable Care Act became law, people who liked their health insurance would be able to keep it. But millions of Americans are getting or are about to get cancellation letters for their health insurance under Obamacare, say experts, and the Obama administration has known that for at least three years.

Four sources deeply involved in the Affordable Care Act tell NBC NEWS that 50 to 75 percent of the 14 million consumers who buy their insurance individually can expect to receive a “cancellation” letter or the equivalent over the next year because their existing policies don’t meet the standards mandated by the new health care law. One expert predicts that number could reach as high as 80 percent. And all say that many of those forced to buy pricier new policies will experience “sticker shock.”
Advertise | AdChoices

None of this should come as a shock to the Obama administration. The law states that policies in effect as of March 23, 2010 will be “grandfathered,” meaning consumers can keep those policies even though they don’t meet requirements of the new health care law. But the Department of Health and Human Services then wrote regulations that narrowed that provision, by saying that if any part of a policy was significantly changed since that date — the deductible, co-pay, or benefits, for example — the policy would not be grandfathered.

Buried in Obamacare regulations from July 2010 is an estimate that because of normal turnover in the individual insurance market, “40 to 67 percent” of customers will not be able to keep their policy. And because many policies will have been changed since the key date, “the percentage of individual market policies losing grandfather status in a given year exceeds the 40 to 67 percent range.”

That means the administration knew that more than 40 to 67 percent of those in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans, even if they liked them.

Yet President Obama, who had promised in 2009, “if you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan,” was still saying in 2012, “If [you] already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance.”

“This says that when they made the promise, they knew half the people in this market outright couldn’t keep what they had and then they wrote the rules so that others couldn’t make it either,” said Robert Laszewski, of Health Policy and Strategy Associates, a consultant who works for health industry firms. Laszewski estimates that 80 percent of those in the individual market will not be able to keep their current policies and will have to buy insurance that meets requirements of the new law, which generally requires a richer package of benefits than most policies today.

The White House does not dispute that many in the individual market will lose their current coverage, but argues they will be offered better coverage in its place, and that many will get tax subsidies that would offset any increased costs. “One of the main goals of the law is to ensure that people have insurance they can rely on – that doesn’t discriminate or charge more based on pre-existing conditions. The consumers who are getting notices are in plans that do not provide all these protections – but in the vast majority of cases, those same insurers will automatically shift their enrollees to a plan that provides new consumer protections and, for nearly half of individual market enrollees, discounts through premium tax credits,” said White House spokesperson Jessica Santillo.

Individual insurance plans with low premiums often lack basic benefits, such as prescription drug coverage, or carry high deductibles and out-of-pocket costs. The Affordable Care Act requires all companies to offer more benefits, such as mental health care, and also bars companies from denying coverage for preexisting conditions.
Advertise | AdChoices

Today, White House spokesman Jay Carney was asked about the president’s promise that consumers would be able to keep their health care. “What the president said and what everybody said all along is that there are going to be changes brought about by the Affordable Care Act to create minimum standards of coverage, minimum services that every insurance plan has to provide,” Carney said. “So it’s true that there are existing healthcare plans on the individual market that don’t meet those minimum standards and therefore do not qualify for the Affordable Care Act.”

Courtesy of Heather Goldwater

Heather Goldwater, 38, of South Carolina, says that she received a letter from her insurer saying the company would no longer offer her plan, but hasn’t yet received a follow-up letter with a comparable option.

Other experts said that most consumers in the individual market will not be able to keep their policies. Nancy Thompson, senior vice president of CBIZ Benefits, which helps companies manage their employee benefits, says numbers in this market are hard to pin down, but that data from states and carriers suggests “anywhere from 50 to 75 percent” of individual policy holders will get cancellation letters. Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, who chairs the health committee of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, says that estimate is “probably about right.” She added that a few states are asking insurance companies to cancel and replace policies, rather than just amend them, to avoid confusion.

A spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), an insurance trade association, also said the 50 to 75 percent estimate was consistent with the range they are hearing.

Those getting the cancellation letters are often shocked and unhappy.

George Schwab, 62, of North Carolina, said he was “perfectly happy” with his plan from Blue Cross Blue Shield, which also insured his wife for a $228 monthly premium. But this past September, he was surprised to receive a letter saying his policy was no longer available. The “comparable” plan the insurance company offered him carried a $1,208 monthly premium and a $5,500 deductible.

And the best option he’s found on the exchange so far offered a 415 percent jump in premium, to $948 a month.

“I’m sitting here looking at this, thinking we ought to just pay the fine and just get insurance when we’re sick,” Schwab added. “Everybody’s worried about whether the website works or not, but that’s fixable. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. This stuff isn’t fixable.”

Heather Goldwater, 38, of South Carolina, is raising a new baby while running her own PR firm. She said she received a letter last July from Cigna, her insurance company, that said the company would no longer offer her individual plan, and promised to send a letter by October offering a comparable option. So far, she hasn’t received anything.

“I’m completely overwhelmed with a six-month-old and a business,” said Goldwater. “The last thing I can do is spend hours poring over a website that isn’t working, trying to wrap my head around this entire health care overhaul.”
Advertise | AdChoices

Goldwater said she supports the new law and is grateful for provisions helping folks like her with pre-existing conditions, but she worries she won’t be able to afford the new insurance, which is expected to cost more because it has more benefits. “I’m jealous of people who have really good health insurance,” she said. “It’s people like me who are stuck in the middle who are going to get screwed.”

Richard Helgren, a Lansing, Mich., retiree, said he was “irate” when he received a letter informing him that his wife Amy’s $559 a month health plan was being changed because of the law. The plan the insurer offered raised his deductible from $0 to $2,500, and the company gave him 17 days to decide.

The higher costs spooked him and his wife, who have painstakingly planned for their retirement years. “Every dollar we didn’t plan for erodes our standard of living,” Helgren said.

Ulltimately, though Helgren opted not to shop through the ACA exchanges, he was able to apply for a good plan with a slightly lower premium through an insurance agent.

He said he never believed President Obama’s promise that people would be able to keep their current plans.

“I heard him only about a thousand times,” he said. “I didn’t believe him when he said it though because there was just no way that was going to happen. They wrote the regulations so strictly that none of the old polices can grandfather.”

For months, Laszewski has warned that some consumers will face sticker shock. He recently got his own notice that he and his wife cannot keep their current policy, which he described as one of the best, so-called “Cadillac” plans offered for 2013. Now, he said, the best comparable plan he found for 2014 has a smaller doctor network, larger out-of-pocket costs, and a 66 percent premium increase.

“Mr. President, I like the coverage I have,” Laszweski said. “It is the best health insurance policy you can buy.”

Dem Strategist: ‘Party Is F****d’
Print article Send a Tip
by Mike Flynn 28 Oct 2013, 10:06 AM PDT post a comment
Ron Fournier, an honest liberal at National Journal, reported Monday that a senior Democrat strategist, with close ties to the White House, sent him an email over the weekend. The subject line was “Dem Party Is F****d.” The substance of the email was the ongoing failures with ObamaCare. Not the website problems, however. The looming problem for the Democrat party is the actual impact of the program.

In his email, the Democrat strategists excerpted a story from the LA Times about the sticker shock many middle class Californians were experiencing with the new insurance policies under ObamaCare. President Obama repeatedly promised that “if you like your plan, you can keep it.” It turns out, that wasn’t true. The coverage mandates in ObamaCare have forced many insurers to cancel their existing policies, forcing individuals into more expensive coverage.

“I was all for Obamacare,” wrote a young woman complaining about a 50 percent rate hike, “until I found out I was paying for it.”

ObamaCare was passed over three years ago. Democrats, at the time, predicted that the public would come to approve the new program after it was implemented. Just four weeks into implementation, Democrats are scurrying to mitigate the effects of the law. Vulnerable Democrats in the Senate are pushing to delay the individual mandate, an action that would completely undo the economic assumptions underlying ObamaCare.

Seasoned Democrats may worry that the party is f****d because of ObamaCare, but they may still win a reprieve. The GOP Establishment has declared war on the Tea Party, whose every prognostication of ObamaCare has been proved right. Typically, the GOP is ready to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

If you have not looked at the videos (WITH links to government website sources) this guy has produced starting in early September now is probably the time to do so. There are about a dozen in which he documented the above and much more. There is no question in my mind this is “the” false flag set-up intended to bring us to our knees and it will be very difficult to combat.

There is no question in my mind this is “the” false flag set-up intended to bring us to our knees and it will be very difficult to combat.

Which is why, with but the tiniest touch of foresight, I decided to make sure I had a small but sufficient stockpile of things I may need. And you can always pick up more from those who no longer need them.

LC Xystus @ #:14 “Saw the vid but don’t understand this prediction.” I understand. One video does not a compelling story make. One has to take about five minutes at the website scrolling back to early September reading JUST the titles of each post to get an overview. Stop along the way at any particular piece that attracts your attention. A few examples of about twenty –

In the same way that gov has spent billions of dollars stockpiling food, guns, ammunition, and militarizing our domestic police forces, so they are doing with prepping for a medical emergency – most info points at H7N9 asian bird flu pandemic.

There are those arguing that this is just good planning on gov part, wouldn’t we want them to be prepared? The thing is, my sources keep telling me – there is NO word out yet of this hitting America. It IS a very real possibility, no discounting that, but not yet…

Where I am going with all this is that the elaborate preparations, this new tool in their arsenal, I believe, will be used in conjunction with all their other buys to PREMATURELY detonate a false flag situation to accomplish their goal of controlling the masses. All of their stockpiling/planning will be used to support their efforts of policing, it for sure is not planned for the benefit of the people.
And they need to do it sooner rather than later because the people, like those who come here, are ready for them. Others not so much but there has been an awakening to some degree. They are running out of time – and they know it.

Seems to me that “militarizing our domestic police forces” could easily backfire on the Feds. Various state & local police are not loyal to der Fubar & may easily turn their nice new hardware on his would-be stormtroopers.

The Communist Takeover Of America – 45 Declared Goalshttp://rense.com/general32/americ.htm%5B12/27/2012 9:34:44 AM]
Rense.com
The Communist Takeover Of
America – 45 Declared Goals
From Greg Swank
12-4-2
You are about to read a list of 45 goals that found their way down the halls of
our great Capitol back in 1963. As you read this, 39 years later, you should
be shocked by the events that have played themselves out. I first ran across
this list 3 years ago but was unable to attain a copy and it has bothered me
ever since. Recently, Jeff Rense posted it on his site and I would like to thank
him for doing so. http://www.rense.com
Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35
January 10, 1963
Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S.
HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Thursday, January 10, 1963 .
Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an
ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published
the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the
public to the dangers of communism in America.
At Mrs. Nordman’s request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous
consent, the following “Current Communist Goals,” which she identifies as an
excerpt from “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen:
[From “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen]
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be
a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation