To link to the entire object, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed the entire object, paste this HTML in websiteTo link to this page, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed this page, paste this HTML in website

515 E. St. Clair St
Indianapolis, In 46202
Paul Atkinson, President
Sally Spiers, Vice President
Vicki Stovall, Secretary
Lance Ratliff, Treasurer
Board of Directors
Tom Harton
Kevin Kinne
Chuck. Knox
Patti Moore
Jim Sheldon
Jesse Speight
Laura Stocum
August 2, 1993
Pat Jacobs, Administrative Assistant
Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission
1821 City-County Building
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Subject - IHPC FILE 93-158, Richard Sullivan
Dear Pat,
The Department of Transportation accommodated Mr. Sullivan's request to allow parking on the
west side of the 800 block of N. College St., which is in front of his residence. This request was
made during a public hearing on June 2, 1993, and will be in effect when N. College becomes a
two-way street in the Fall of 1993.
In addition to the permitted parking in front of his residence, there is available parking on the
north side of 9th St. The residence is on the southwest corner of College and 9th.
The existing limestone curb and sidewalk on the south side of 9th St. are currently being used as
a "driveway" for three parking spaces in the back yard. This is according to Mr. Sullivan's
application and IHPC FILE 93-158, dated 7-20-93. At present the limestone is in good
condition and in character with the streetscape along 9th. St. The curbs are continuous from
College westward to Broadway, although the sidewalk are in poor condition and possibly may
be replaced by DOT.
Several concerns were expressed at the Chatham Arch Neighborhood Association (CANA)
meeting on July 27,1993, regarding the removal of the limestone curb. (1) If it is removed and is
reusable, will DOT place it at another location in Chatham Arch where it is needed, such as the
north side of 9th St. near College? (2) A three car wide driveway (approximately 27'"), seems
inappropriate for a residential street. (3) Is the 27' of sidewalk to be included in the curb cut for
which Mr. Sullivan is contracting? (4) When the property was rented by Mr. Sullivan, it was a
known fact that there was no egress from the street.

515 E. St. Clair St
Indianapolis, In 46202
Paul Atkinson, President
Sally Spiers, Vice President
Vicki Stovall, Secretary
Lance Ratliff, Treasurer
Board of Directors
Tom Harton
Kevin Kinne
Chuck. Knox
Patti Moore
Jim Sheldon
Jesse Speight
Laura Stocum
August 2, 1993
Pat Jacobs, Administrative Assistant
Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission
1821 City-County Building
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Subject - IHPC FILE 93-158, Richard Sullivan
Dear Pat,
The Department of Transportation accommodated Mr. Sullivan's request to allow parking on the
west side of the 800 block of N. College St., which is in front of his residence. This request was
made during a public hearing on June 2, 1993, and will be in effect when N. College becomes a
two-way street in the Fall of 1993.
In addition to the permitted parking in front of his residence, there is available parking on the
north side of 9th St. The residence is on the southwest corner of College and 9th.
The existing limestone curb and sidewalk on the south side of 9th St. are currently being used as
a "driveway" for three parking spaces in the back yard. This is according to Mr. Sullivan's
application and IHPC FILE 93-158, dated 7-20-93. At present the limestone is in good
condition and in character with the streetscape along 9th. St. The curbs are continuous from
College westward to Broadway, although the sidewalk are in poor condition and possibly may
be replaced by DOT.
Several concerns were expressed at the Chatham Arch Neighborhood Association (CANA)
meeting on July 27,1993, regarding the removal of the limestone curb. (1) If it is removed and is
reusable, will DOT place it at another location in Chatham Arch where it is needed, such as the
north side of 9th St. near College? (2) A three car wide driveway (approximately 27'"), seems
inappropriate for a residential street. (3) Is the 27' of sidewalk to be included in the curb cut for
which Mr. Sullivan is contracting? (4) When the property was rented by Mr. Sullivan, it was a
known fact that there was no egress from the street.