2008/5/26 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry at codeweavers.com>:
> "Kai Blin" <kai.blin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > + {FROM_PROTOCOL_INFO, FROM_PROTOCOL_INFO},
>> > > };
>> >
>> > Although it was the case before, it's a mistake to have a comma after
>> > the last struct member initializer.
>>>> It is? K&R seems to use both, so I preferred to keep it similar to all the
>> other struct member initializers.
>> I said "a mistake" not "an error". Although the compiler forgives this, what
> the last comma is serving for?
>The C standard explicitly allows the comma at the end of initializer
lists, this would be a style issue at best.