Saturday, 16 January 2016

Should We Fix the Date of Easter?

A formidable
line-up of Christian leaders is discussing whether to fix the date of Easter.
It includes Pope Francis, the Ecumenical Patriarch, the Coptic Pope, the
Primates of the Anglican Communion and the Archbishop of Canterbury.

When so many
global concerns clamour for the attention of religious leaders, why on earth
are they even considering talking about the church calendar? Isn’t it a case of
displacement activity of the first order?

These are
waters to venture into warily. Blood has been spilt over the date of Easter. For
the Saxon church in England, Bede tells us, it was a big point of dispute
between those who followed Roman use, and those who adhered to the old Irish
calendar. When a royal husband and wife observed different customs, there were
years when for a whole week, one would still be fasting while the other feasted
merrily away.

When I was a
chorister and (God forbid!) my thoughts wandered during the sermon, I used to
amuse myself deciphering the complex rules set out in the Book of Common Prayer to calculate the date of Easter. My head would spin with Sunday Letters,
Epacts, Golden Numbers and long division by 19. I even wrote an article about
it for the school magazine, arguing that we should fix the date of Easter on the
second Sunday of April. Not only would it be so much simpler, and make life
more convenient for a lot of people, and enable Christians across the world to
celebrate the resurrection on the same day, but it would also mean more reliable bank holiday
weather and considerably increase the frequency on which Easter Day fell on my
birthday.

There is,
clearly, a strong ecumenical case for Christendom to observe a single
liturgical calendar. Nobody would dispute that. It’s impressive that even Islam
in its bitterly divided state observes the same (lunar) calendar, as of course
does Judaism. So I’m all for top-level discussions about whether agreement
about the date of Easter could be reached by the world’s historic churches.

But I’d need
persuading to think it’s right to disconnect the date of Easter from a long
history of determining it in the way we currently do. Here’s why.

Firstly, its origins go back centuries before
the Christian era itself. Easter Day falls on the first Sunday after the
Paschal Moon which is the first full moon after the spring equinox. (There were
debates about what happened when the full moon fell on a Sunday, and whether it
counted if that was the equinox itself.) It’s the Paschal Moon that
determines the date of the Jewish Passover on the night following 14 Nisan. So
the Christian Easter is hard-wired to Judaism and the Festival of Passover. This is made
much of in the New Testament where the passion and resurrection accounts are
shot through with passover imagery. It’s not too much to say that the entire biblical
theology of Jesus’ death and resurrection is premised on it. We should not
sacrifice it.

Second, this close relationship between the
Jewish and Christian calendars is a vital link between our two faith
traditions. Holy Week and Easter texts have always had a special regard for Jewish
rites and ceremonies taking place at precisely the same time of year. Our two
faiths are uniquely held together by scripture, history, covenant, and also by our common observance of time. It would be
a bad mistake to weaken the calendrical and liturgical threads that bind us
together. (I should declare an interest here and admit that I write as a
Christian of Jewish background.)

Third, the calculation of Easter, involving as
it does the movements of sun, moon and earth, gives our feasts and fasts a
dimension that is nothing less than cosmic. Astronomy and our concept of
time comes into things. It tells us that what we do as people of faith is
intimately connected to physical science and mathematics. You could say that the
universe is ‘aware’ of and ‘interested’ in when and how we celebrate the
passion and resurrection of Jesus. That is to say, Easter is of cosmic
importance. It involves the whole of creation. It isn’t any old date in
springtime that happens to suit us.

I believe
that our capacity for religious imagination is at stake here. The prosaic ‘second
or third Sunday in April’ could never capture the rich theology that I’ve outlined.
Easter would be cut adrift from a truly ancient religious history. It would have
severed its relationship with astronomy and mathematics that makes it a festival
not only of human but of universal significance. The symbolism of the paschal season which is the pivot of
the entire year would be impoverished. A glory would have departed.

Easter, with
its idiosyncratic and rather wonderful variation of date, compels us to notice
it and adjust our lives around it. It’s that way round. I’m just not persuaded
by arguments from convenience. However, as I said, I’m all for worldwide
Christianity agreeing on a matter that shouldn’t divide us. I’d have thought
that nowadays there was sufficient consensus about the calendar to achieve this.
So by all means, let an ecumenical conversation happen. But please don’t let’s give
up on such a long and rich paschal tradition too quickly.

11 comments:

Hear, hear!! By all means agree on a common liturgical calendar but resist selling out to the secular world's agenda - making Easter invisible. This goes very deep and the ABC's casual tone does it a disservice as an issue.

I think that the Passover connection is too important to lose, because of the date of the most sacred time in the Christian tradition, the commemoration of Jesus' death and resurrection,and Christianity's relationship to Judaism, to which the Roman church is paying particular attention

I rather agree with the Chorister Sadgrove rather than the retired Dean Sadgrove and would certainly opt to fix Easter Day on the Second Sunday in April. As a clergyman still in harness but getting older each and every successive year, early Easters such as we are having this year are hellish! One hardly has time to draw breath after Christmas before Ash Wednesday and Lent are upon us with all that entails. The poor season of Epiphany does not know whether it is coming or going.

Having, I think, nailed it, but mystified as to why this site chose to christen me only "Athena", when I'm EnglishAthena everywhere else.... Anyway. I'd be very sorry to lose the connection to Passover, personally. It is a bit of a pain for schools, universities and so on, but it's all perfectly predictable, so it can't be that hard.

I don't understand why you use the term "hardwired". Easter and Passover have a definite historical connecetion but they almost never occur on the same date. This year they're almost a full moon cycle apart. Other years they can be a quarter or half moon apart, or almost co-incide. What does "hardwired" mean?

About Me

Lives in retirement in Northumberland. Was Dean of Durham 2003-2015; before that, in cathedral and parish ministry, and in theological education.
Ponders and writes on faith, society, the North East, arts, books, Europe and anything else that intrigues.
My Durham Cathedral blog to 2015: http://decanalwoolgatherer.blogspot.co.uk.
This Northern Woolgatherer blog from 2015: http://northernwoolgatherer.blogspot.co.uk.
My archive of sermons and addresses: http://northernambo.blogspot.com.
Tweets at @sadgrovem.