ZetaTalk: Minneapolis Bridgewritten Aug 2, 2007

7 Dead, Dozens Injured In I-35W Bridge Collapse [Aug 2] Interstate 35W bridge spanning
the Mississippi River in Minneapolis collapsed, sending cars, people and debris into the river
below. The collapse was likely structural in nature. It was not an act of terrorism. The
bridge was undergoing repair work when it collapsed. Of the eight lanes on the roadway,
four were closed for repair to the 40-year-old bridge's deck, joints, guardrails and lights.
None of it would be related to the structure. The bridge was inspected by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation in 2005 and 2006 and that no structural problems were
noted. [and from another] Bridge Collapse Probe Focuses on Unexplained Shift [Aug 3]
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/08/03/bridge.structure/ Investigators trying to figure out what
caused Wednesday's massive bridge collapse are focusing on the southern end of the span.
The NTSB says one part of the bridge shifted 50 feet as it fell, while other sections collapsed
in place. What's getting investigators' attention is the way the southern part of the bridge fell in a video they've already examined --
recorded by a security camera near the bridge's north end -- and the way the section settled after the collapse. It appears that it has
shifted approximately 50 feet to the east and when we compare that to what we've seen in the rest of the bridge -- the rest of the bridge
appears to have collapsed in place. [and from another] I live in a suburb of Minneapolis and nothing has ever happened like this before.
There were reports in the news of a 'rotten egg smell' and an outbreak of of algae just a few days prior to this. I also felt, or heard, a
strange frequency a couple of hours before this happened. [and from another] VIDEO: YouTube at Moment of Collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osocGiofdvc

We have predicted that bridges crossing the Mississippi will be affected when the New Madrid and related fault lines adjust, going into the pole shift. Was this
bridge collapse which crossed the Mississippi in Minnesota caused by such an adjustment, the footings on one side of the bridge moving in an opposite direction
from the footings on the other side, or perhaps the bridge being pulled apart? The Mississippi River is born in Minnesota, tumbling out of the headwaters in the
highlands of Minnesota over a series of natural falls. This is a clue that adjustments in the rock strata could be involved. The highlands of Minnesota come to a point
at Minneapolis, with lower land lying to the East along this point. What caused the land to the East to drop, unless this land was stretched in the past?

We have stated that the ripping apart of the St. Lawrence Seaway ends in the rumpled Black Hills of SD. Run a line from Montreal, at the mouth of the seaway, to
Rapid City, SD and the line runs through Minneapolis. Why would an adjustment be made in the middle of this stretch zone while the seaway itself did not part?
When we described the diagonal pull the N American continent is enduring, and just how this will snap when adjustments are made, we did not intend that this
process would occur smoothly, all at once as described. Weak points along the rip lines give way one by one, each such adjustment placing stress on other points
in a domino manner. The I35W bridge, being the larger of the bridges crossing the Mississippi at this point, was less able to adapt to a change in position vis-a-vis
its footings on either side of the river, as it was an interstate bridge supporting several lanes, and thus had massive and thus rigid supports. Smaller bridges have
more flexibility as they are built to withstand uneven loads on either end, thus are more springy by design.

Will there be more such disasters along the Mississippi and in the cities that will be affected by the New Madrid and seaway rip? This is just the start, and when the
pace picks up, there will be no question that something other than Global Warming is the cause.

This creates a diagonal stress on the N American continent where New England is
pulled to the east while Mexico is pulled to the West, so the New Madrid is put under
slip-slide stress where one half, east of the Mississippi, will move toward the NE while
the other, west of the Mississippi, moves toward the SW. A widening seaway also does
not affect just those land masses bordering the seaway, as buckling occurs inland and
afar. What does man assume caused the Black Hills to be so rumpled, with the
appearance of a recent buckling and heaving? This is the center of a land plate! The
tearing of the seaway does not end at Duluth, Minnesota, it travels underground to S
Dakota!

What does this do to the N. American plate? It
pulls it at a diagonal, ripping the rock fingers
along the New Madrid fault such that the land
to the East of the Mississippi moves up and to
the East, toward New England, and the land to
the West of the Mississippi moves down and to
the West. This does more than tear most of the
bridges along the Mississippi.