September 1, 2017

5:53 pm

The Los Angeles City Council voted Wednesday to remove Columbus Day from the city calendar and made the second Monday in October a holiday to honor indigenous people.

The council voted 14-1 to support the replacing of Columbus Day with Indigenous Peoples Day. Councilman Joe Buscaino opposed the motion. The Los Angeles County Human Relations Commission first presented a report in favor of establishing Indigenous Peoples Day to the Arts, Parks and River Committee in November.

Mitch O’Farrell, chair of the committee, a council member for District 13, said in November he thinks Christopher Columbus’ legacy should not be celebrated in Los Angeles because European explorers perpetrated violence against indigenous peoples who lived in present-day Los Angeles.

O’Farrell, a member of the Wyandotte Nation, added he thinks Los Angeles should celebrate indigenous peoples because the city has the highest population of Native Americans in the United States.

At Wednesday’s council meeting, some Italian-Americans said they think eliminating Columbus Day as a holiday erases part of their heritage because Christopher Columbus was Italian. Several added they support creating Indigenous Peoples Day on a different date.

Buscaino, a first-generation Italian-American, said he thinks the council’s vote offended Italian-Americans in part because they have historically faced prejudice in the United States.

Before Wednesday’s vote, Buscaino had proposed replacing Columbus Day with a holiday that would honor every culture of Los Angeles and, along with councilmembers Mitchell Englander, Gil Cedillo and David Ryu, introduced a plan to hold Indigenous Peoples Day on Aug. 9 instead. The council voted down the later motion 11-4.

Poll

The University of California Office of the President commissioned a report on how to reduce the office’s costs. UCOP provides resources for UC-wide initiatives such as carbon reduction and cyber security efforts. The report follows pressure from state legislators for the office to cut unnecessary expenses. What do you think about this?
The proposals would eliminate unecessary programs and are a praiseworthy attempt by UCOP to streamine its operations.
The proposals merely transfer funding to UC campuses and are a see-through attempt by UCOP to improve its image in the eyes of the state government.
The proposals are harmful as they would cut out 110 jobs at UCOP and eliminate programs that help students.
I have feelings about this issue that are not expressed in the options above.
Submit View results without voting »