UK: Croydon Council Case Highlights The Issues Around Costs For Many Local Housing Authorities

Susan Elmore, Senior Associate and housing litigation
specialist, acted for The London Borough of Croydon
("LBC") in its successful appeal against a county court
decision to award an applicant for housing, Vanda Lopes
("VL"), 85% of her costs following settlement by consent
of statutory county court appeal proceedings issued pursuant to
Part 7, Section 204 of the Housing Act 1996 ("the
Act").

VL's appeal was against a decision by LBC on a review of an
earlier refusal to provide VL and her family with housing on the
grounds that she was not homeless, or threatened with homelessness,
finding she had accommodation available to her in Portugal. VL
served fresh information after she had instigated the appeal. The
High Court held that:

LBC had not failed to carry out adequate inquiries; and

Had the appeal been fought, LBC would have been successful in
resisting it; and

As LBC would have to entertain a fresh homelessness application
in any event;

So it was entitled to its costs.

The facts in brief

VL challenged LBC's review decision pursuant to Section 202
of the Act that VL was not homeless as she had accommodation in
Portugal which was available and suitable for her and her
family's occupation. The accommodation was a flat which she had
previously occupied with her partner, two children, mother-in-law,
brother-in-law and his family.

This decision was reached following two interviews conducted by
LBC with VL, with an interpreter present at both. The notes of the
first interview with VL recorded that "she left as there was
no work in Portugal" and that she was not asked to
leave. Her partner and children continued to live in the
flat when she came to the UK. The second interview notes recorded
that VL had again stated that she was not asked to leave but that
as there was tension and disagreements with her brother-in-law, she
had been told to find a solution to the issue and so had left to
find work in the UK. It was only after she found work that her
family came to reside with her. LBC had concluded that VL had
planned her move to the UK and had not been evicted from the flat
by her mother-in-law. VL appealed.

Shortly after lodging the appeal, VL served a witness statement
exhibiting a letter from her mother-in-law stating she would not be
able to accommodate VL and her family at her home in
Portugal.

Due to this fresh information, VL agreed to withdraw her appeal
and LBC agreed to withdraw its decision, the subject of the appeal
and issue a fresh Section 202 review decision.

The issue of costs

As to the costs of the appeal, VL argued that she should recover
her costs as she had obtained the relief sought as if she had won
her appeal. LBC argued VL would have lost her appeal but that it
would have had to entertain a fresh application based on the new
evidence from VL's mother-in-law in any event, and so it should
recover its costs of the appeal.

The issue of costs was determined by the court on paper. VL
submitted that LBC had failed to make reasonable and proper
inquiries before making its decision and that, had it
contacted VL's mother-in-law, it would have obtained the new
information before its Section 202 decision was reached. VL would
not therefore have had to submit this new evidence on
appeal.

Further, that the effect of the Judgment of Lord Neuberger in
Regina (M) v Croydon LBC (2012) EWCA Civ 595 1 W.L.R. 2607 at
paragraph (61) was that VL should be awarded her costs because
Croydon Council had agreed to make a fresh decision on her
homelessness application and she had therefore received the relief
sought.

LBC submitted that it had made appropriate inquiries by
interviewing VL twice, with a person present who could interpret
for her and in relying on what she had said. As a
fresh application would in any event have had to be entertained
based on the fresh information, it was commercially sensible to
agree within the appeal to undertake a fresh review when the fresh
information could then be considered. Further LBC submitted
that it would have won the appeal had it not been compromised for
commercial reasons.

The Central London County Court judge, HHJ Bailey, awarded VL
85% of her costs of the appeal. LBC appealed against that costs
order.

The issues on appeal before the High
Court

Was the judge wrong in ordering LBC to pay 85% of VL's
costs of the appeal?; and

If so, what was the correct order for costs, that:

VL pays the costs of the appeal

That there be no order for costs

The High Court decision

In reaching its decision, the High Court held that:

The court below had failed to identify and apply the
appropriate test in determining whether proper inquiries had been
made. It was for LBC to decide what inquiries were appropriate to
enable it to be satisfied of the relevant matters under the Act,
with its decision being subject to challenge on traditional public
law grounds.

That the question of costs in appeals settled by consent
depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. As held in the
case of Regina (M) v Croydon LBC: whether a party has
succeeded in obtaining the relief sought, the facts of the case may
make it appropriate to make:

No order as to costs; or

If it is reasonably clear who would have won to award that
party their costs; or

Where settlement does not reflect a party's claim, to
determine who would have won and award that party their costs.

Where it is not possible to determine without a
disproportionate expenditure of judicial time, the appropriate
order is no order for costs.

The provisions of Practice Direction 52A provides that where an
applicant does not wish to proceed with an appeal it can:

Ask the court to dismiss it, when costs will normally be
awarded against the applicant;

Seek to agree with the respondent there should be no order for
costs and ask the court to dismiss on this basis;

The claimant and the respondent can ask for the appeal to be
dismissed, when if approved the appeal will be dismissed.

Applying the above, the High Court held that LBC would have
succeeded on the appeal. It had:

Made appropriate inquiries by interviewing VL twice, in the
presence of an interpreter; and

Obtained information from her as to the nature of the
accommodation in Portugal, which she and her family were
occupying;

That she had not been asked to leave that
accommodation;and

That she had come to the UK to look for employment with a view
to her partner and children joining her at that stage.

LBC did not act unlawfully by not making further inquiries or by
not contacting VL's mother-in-law in Portugal. LBC was entitled
to conclude on the material before it that VL was not homeless or
threatened with homelessness. Accommodation was available for her
and her family in Portugal.

Furthermore, the reason for LBC agreeing to withdraw its review
decision, rather than fighting the appeal, was that VL had produced
the new material, after she had instituted the appeal proceedings.
That meant that LBC would be obliged to conduct further inquiries
into any fresh application for housing assistance made on the basis
of that new information, irrespective of the outcome of the appeal.
The appeal had thereby been rendered academic but, had it been
fought, the High Court held that LBC would have been successful in
resisting it and so the successful party. In all those
circumstances, the proper order was that VL pays the costs of the
appeal, subject to any protection to which she was entitled by
reason of being publicly funded.

Guidance on jurisdiction for hearing the costs
appeal

This case also provides guidance on jurisdiction of statutory
county court appeals on costs. At the permission to appeal stage
the Court of Appeal held that where on an appeal there had been a
decision on costs only and the court had not considered the
validity of the underlying decision, an appeal in relation to those
costs lay to the High Court not the Court of Appeal.

Conclusion

This case highlights the issues currently faced by many Local
Housing Authorities on the issues around costs. It confirms that
the court will not simply award a claimant its costs on the basis
it obtained the relief sought, but will in appropriate cases order
costs against an applicant.

The fact a party may have obtained all or some of the relief
sought is not always a reason to award that party its costs.
Consideration must be given to the circumstance leading to an
agreement between the parties as well as the merits of each
party's case.

Of the merits of the challenge, it is for the council to judge
what inquiries are necessary and it is only susceptible to a
successful challenge if it is considered that no reasonable council
would have failed to regard as necessary the further inquiries
suggested by the applicant for assistance. That such additional
enquiries may have been 'helpful' is not sufficient.

Further, LBC took a sensible approach in agreeing to carry out a
fresh review decision to consider the new information submitted by
VL. The alternative approach was to fight the appeal, when at the
same time, VL was entitled to make a fresh homelessness
application, when, LBC would be required to consider the new
information in any event.

Although costs in the case at first instance can only be
enforced with leave of the Court against a legally aided applicant,
the costs in the appeal are recoverable from the Legal Aid Agency,
which must be claimed within three months of the order awarding the
costs.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Data protection presents one of the biggest challenges for both trustees and employers in 2018. As data controllers get ready for the GDPR, they are faced with problems in ensuring that existing processes and policies comply with the new law.

This Q&A session, led by pensions and information lawyers, will focus on practical solutions for how trustees and employers should deal with member communications, third party service providers and reporting data breaches, as well as any other areas that affect you.

Data protection presents one of the biggest challenges for both trustees and employers in 2018. As data controllers get ready for the GDPR, they are faced with problems in ensuring that existing processes and policies comply with the new law.

This Q&A session, led by pensions and information lawyers, will focus on practical solutions for how trustees and employers should deal with member communications, third party service providers and reporting data breaches, as well as any other areas that affect you.

2018 is set to be another big year in employment, with employers set to face new challenges and responsibilities. At our event, looking ahead to next year, we will be discussing four key issues you might face in 2018, providing useful tips and answering your questions.

The recent decision in Interserve Construction Ltd v Hitachi Zosen Inova AG, has confirmed the importance of understanding and complying with the contractual process when it comes to terminating a construction contract.

In February 2017, in Carillion Construction Ltd v Emcor Engineering Services Ltd,1 the Court of Appeal had the opportunity to consider a novel issue in relation to extensions of time: how extensions of time after the date for completion are applied.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you
are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its
terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement
to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use
of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq
Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to
read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may
not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative
works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the
Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms &
conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use
electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s
content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products
which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the
suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics
published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related
graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or
its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with
regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of
merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement.
In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any
special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting
from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence
or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or
performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include
technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added
to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make
improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described
herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally
identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for
three primary purposes:

To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.

To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a
colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third
parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information
providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their
articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and
services.

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to
view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our
users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can
customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware'
functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately.
This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to
our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting
articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for
registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate
sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the
pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us
(e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who
author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us
not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above
or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the
Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via
email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when
they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no
disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate
registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and
topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it.
Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page
and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their
personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an
identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information
about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they
use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the
Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to
personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information
specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and
cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function
unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are
disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the
information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned
about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to
expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option
as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example,
advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we
are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement,
and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not
linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or
its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other
sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read
the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement
applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or
contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and
the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information
requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name
and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age
level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes.
Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the
functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our
site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this
information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq,
but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to
request the removal of this information from our database.

Emails

From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’
information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your
information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you
have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to
webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode),
or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way
to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can
usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will
post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information
we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it.
If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner
different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by
way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their
information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with
the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these
principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use
commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions