The state’s (New York’s) highest court has toppled a cultural taboo — legalizing a degree of incest, at least between an uncle and niece — in a unanimous ruling.
While the laws against “parent-child and brother-sister marriages .?.?. are grounded in the almost universal horror with which such marriages are viewed .?.?. there is no comparably strong objection to uncle-niece marriages,” Tuesday’s ruling reads.

Remember: There are no slippery slopes, you’re just a paranoid extremist, and accepting the argument that “the government (meaning the law) has no business in our bedrooms and should never interfere with the love between consenting adults” will never EVER lead to the blessing of polygamy, incest or marrying your favorite video game (this last we could at least dismiss as being merely idiotic, which seems to be the way humanity is going).

And if you think otherwise you’re just a paranoid, bigoted subhuman who should be put in jail for thought crimes.

From one of our favorite sites, Protein Wisdom, from whom we nicked this story:

Though, it makes a convenient excuse for judges who either don’t know, don’t care or are timid about the history of marriage and want to be viewed as Modern and Hip.

Or maybe they just have really sexy nubile nieces that they’d like to bury their rods in one day.

This country really needs a lesson, or the Good L-rd is going to owe Sodom and Gomorrah a serious apology.

4

Leave a Reply

When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.

DisagreeAgree

4Comment threads

0Thread replies

0Followers

Most reacted comment

Hottest comment thread

4Comment authors

Recent comment authors

Connect with

I allow to create an account

When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.

DisagreeAgree

Subscribe

newestoldestmost voted

Notify of

fporretto

Good Lord. First cousins are prohibited from marrying in nearly all states, and an uncle and niece are even more consanguineous. What was this judge thinking?

Vote Up0Vote Down

November 1, 2014 01:46

I’m guessing this lawsuit was filed on behalf of some mohammedan who wants to bring the wonders of his culture of inbreeding (rampant genetic diseases, average IQ 30 points lower than western IQs, etc.) to our shores. But there’s no slippery slope, remember that when your prepubescent daughter is sitting in a stall next to a 40 year old drag… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down

November 1, 2014 04:02

Qoheleth

Damn. This took place in New York. I don’t ever want to hear one more damnyankee make another comment about redneck inbred Southerners. (Okay, it sort of gets an asterisk — Vietnamese immigrants in New York. Still, that’s on Yankee soil, and not Florida or Lower Alabama.) Still, it boils down to people demanding the right to do whatever repulsive… Read more »