Subscribe To

Tuesday, 25 October 2016

America's road to dictatorship

“A
pessimist is someone who says things can’t get any worse. Am
optimist knows that they can”

America
sleepwalks into full-blown fascism

Seemorerocks

The
article below rings alarm bells for me.

We
know from experience that America now has a choice between a corrupt,
criminal warmonger who is likely to take the world to war and a
megalomaniac narcissist who may end up being the perfect candidate to allow the the war
party’s candidate, Killary to win in an election that is already
shown to be rigged.

There
is a lot of optimism amongst certain circles (I come across it every
day) that the Wikileaks release of the Podesta files and the other
revelations might lead to the indictment of Hillary Clinton for her
many crimes and that she is unelectable.Here is one example, just from today -

I
do not share that optimism.

The
revelations have been so damning and coming thick-and-fast that had
America still got a functioning democracy and electorial system
Killary would be totally unelectable and America would have the Donald as president.

However,
I have a cautionary tale for Americans.

At
the end of 2014 we in New Zealand had an election that was also
marred revelations of dirty politics,and also featured some of New
Zealand’s first examples of electoral fraud.

Kim Dotcom, who has fallen victim to the Empire organised a Moment of Truth which featured among others, Glenn Greenwald,Edward Snowden and
Julian Assange – all brought together to expose the worst excesses
of a government under PM John Key.

It
was a time of great hope and excitement for those of us determined to
rid the country of a fascist government – not least because we had
so many great figures all centred on this small country.

However,
the result was very different from what many thought.

Kim
Dotcom,the Internet Party, Dirty Politics – all this, had the
combined effect of increasing John Key’s vote as New
Zealanders essentially voted for fascism.

And I am sure they will do it again next year

The
lies of John Key worked very well.

My thoughts on this were reflected in this article from October, 2014.

I
am far from America and American politics but I have severe
misgivings and feel that November 8 “election” will go down as
the date when the shit hits the fan and America has Hillary Clinton
installed as its first dictator and the world moves to war (and I
don’t mean what we are seeing now – I mean hot war).

The
New Zealand elite (and its compliant media) had a very similar
response to events in New Zealand as the following article

Have a look at my article, New Zealanders sleepwalk into fascism and Kim Dotcom’s Moment of Truth along with the following article and then ask yourself if this is not likely to happen in the United States.

WikiLeaks
bombshells about Hillary Clinton fail to detonate - or even rattle
campaign

Washington:
What's up with Mr Assange? He used to drop bunker busters that would
have them quaking in Washington and other world capitals. But this
go-round, he's firing penny crackers that don't quite live up to the
portentous billing he gave them in October – "significant to
the US election."

And
unless the WikiLeaks founder who is holed up in Ecuador's London
embassy, is hanging on to some doozies that he intends to publish in
the last days of a campaign that polls suggest Hillary Clinton has
all but won, it appears that his single-minded campaign to derail the
Democratic candidate might have hit a brick wall.

Assange's
problem is two-fold.

The
content of thousands of emails hacked from the accounts of the
Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign manager John
Podesta certainly have some "inside the beltway" intrigue.
But in the midst of such a divisive and bitterly fought election,
they have, at best, mediocre news value.

Just
as importantly, a desperate-in-defeat GOP candidate, Donald Trump,
continues to suck up most of the media oxygen, thereby taking up the
airtime and print space that might be devoted to stories on the
emails.

Monday
was a case in point. Speaking to farmers at Boynton Beach, Florida,
Trump devoted almost half of his speech to embelishing his grand
conspiracy theory on why his campaign is in free fall – previously,
the media's role in the conspiracy was publication of "untrue"
stories about him sexually assaulting women; now they are publishing
"phony" polls that show Clinton in the lead when in fact,
Trump claims, he is in the lead.

Trump's
claim on Monday that "we're actually winning" will be news
to his campaign manager Kelly Anne Conway who on Sunday, told CNN
that Trump was behind.

Assange
uses strident language to denounce Clinton as a presidential
candidate. By contrast, Trump adviser and confidant Roger Stone has
told reporters that he has a "back channel" to Assange and
on the eve of the most recent WikiLeaks dumps, Stone alluded to
WikiLeaks in a tweet in which he claimed that Clinton "is done."

And
even if it was pure happenstance, the timing of WikiLeaks' first dump
of the latest series of emails, just minutes after Trump's campaign
was engulfed by the release of the "grab-them- by-the-pussy"
video, allows the DNC to claim that Assange was engaged in an attempt
to deflect media attention from Trump's crisis by hoping to create a
crisis for Clinton.

Earlier
in the year, amidst the drama of the GOP primaries contest, Assange
told reporters that he had material on Trump but it was hard for an
"investigative journalist organisation like WikiLeaks" to
publish much more controversial material "than what was coming
out of Donald Trump's mouth every second day."

Hmmmm
– that didn't stop The New York Times lifting the lid on Trump's
non-payment of income tax; or The Washington Post from exposing the
shabby interior of Trump's charitable foundation.

The
leaked emails contain the minutiae of Clinton's campaign preparation
and what are said to be excerpts from some of her controversial
million-dollar speeches to Wall Street bankers – far from revealing
a smoking gun, they hardly amount to a gun.

Rather
than report their tedious detail here, it might be more effective to
report some of the US media reaction to them.

Columnist
Jim Rutenberg: "They have not brought a major scandal to the
surface, at least not yet... they have shown cynical approaches by
Clinton and her team to fund-raising; a penchant for secrecy; a
coziness with reporters that is too often the case with both parties
in Washington; and a calculated approach to environmental issues,
free trade and banking."

A
Washington Post editorial on the speech excerpts was headlined
"Scandal! WikiLeaks reveals Hillary Clinton to be …
reasonable."

In
The New York Times, a Thomas Friedman column began: "Thank God
for WikiLeaks. I confess, I was starting to wonder about what the
real Hillary Clinton - the one you never get to see behind closed
doors - really stood for. But now that, thanks to WikiLeaks, I've had
a chance to peruse her speeches to Goldman Sachs and other banks, I
am more convinced than ever she can be the president America needs
today."

Coupled
with all that and despite her polls lead, Clinton is the second-most
disliked candidate to seek the White House because of her poor
ratings on honesty and trustworthiness – so stories on the detail
of the emails lack stickiness.

More
importantly, unlike Trump who seizes on every piece of bait like a
pit bull, the Clinton campaign simply refuses to engage – instead
[1] it refuses to verify the documents and [2] makes the point that
the role of Russian hackers in passing the documents to WikiLeaks
makes them suspect.

He
writes: "In failing to turn unvarnished internal political
machinations into a paralysing scandal, WikiLeaks may have
inadvertently raised the bar on what constitutes a successful act of
political cyberwar. If all an email hacking accomplishes is the
temporary embarrassment of some political aides and super-sized
servings of gossip for Washington cocktail parties, then the hack is
hardly potent ammo."