Edward there has been exactly zero instances of refugee terrorism despite the 750,000+ refugees immigrating to North America since 9/11.

We’re not even accepting single males. We’re only accepting women, children and families. The argument that these people are dangerous is ridiculous. Also we have gone far enough to determine suitability of the refugees coming here. So far the only ones that have even been admitted, are privately sponsored ones (ones that have family or ties to third party organizations).

Also the comments about the Qu’ran and hostility are totally taken out of context. Do you even care what the actual context is? Every instance of “jihad”, killing etc is when someone else invades their lands and is what you do to the person trying to kill you and your family in your house/country. But who cares about context right? It’s way easier to make millions of people afraid of a group of people if we take their religion, then take pieces out of context, then mis-translate them and spread them via social media to make it sound actually scary.

I could do exactly the same thing with the Bible. I could make it sound like Christians are all terrible people who want everyone who wears polyester clothing killed, or that it’s okay to kill children who don’t listen to you unapologetically 100% of the time. And those example are more in context than the ones you all spout from the Qu’ran. Just for reference.

Kevin C: You once suggested that Isis is wanting a strong reaction against Muslims to drive them int their waiting arms. How much more reason that we get our immigration fixed before we bring in someone who is more apt to accomplish this if they successfully pull off a terrorist attack because our screening policy failed to weed out the bad apples no one denies exist.

Over the weekend Trump was engaged i a war of wards with Prince Alaweed of Saudi Arabia over the immigration issue. What a joke. How many non-Muslims is his country allowing to enter and start their own churches or places of worship? Until that changes their opinion is irrelevant . I did like that Trump called him out on wanting to use Daddy’s money to control U.S. politicians.

Kevin C: we have already had people come from Muslim countries who were not screened out. It only took 14 people to bring down the trade towers and cost an estimated 3.3 trillion dollars. We cannot afford to make these kinds of mistakes too often. How many more of these epic scale attacks do we need to endure before we figure out our economy cannot sustain it? You do realize that was one of their goals don’t you? To collapse or economy? I hope all the refugees are legitimiate refugees and we don’t have any problem but the empty headed open door policies being brought forward by the Trudeau government offers no reassurance. All we get is vague empty assurances from a government that lives in a dream land and hopes to capitalize on the votes. The immigrants we have seen on TV so far have been the results of Harper’s screening. Wait until the door swings wide open and we get Trudeau’s flood. The fact that they have no rejections so far is very telling of how serious the are looking into the issue.

I’ve noticed a repeated pattern in Liberal arguments. “Terrorists would never try to enter the country this way”
Likewise I recall Sun Tzu’s book “The Art of War” Suggesting you should hit an enemy where they think they’re safe.
Do I really need to add the historical quote from Pearl Harbor to drive my point across…?

Kevin C We should go as far as we need to go if we truly value the safety of our citizens. I am happy that Canada has helped many countries over the decades when we can but there is a huge difference in this case. These other immigrants were not coming from countries who declared war on Canada or consider us the great Satan and chant death to America at any given opportunity. I would love to get along with everybody however we have to exercise due diligence before we get ourselves into a mess we can’t easily fix. We did not declare war on Islam but many Islamists have declared war on us. Finding out who is our friend and who is not is not an easy task. If you do not value your own safety that is fine but you owe it to the rest of your countrymen to take their safety seriously. We also do not owe it to anyone to take in their refugees, We do it because we want to when we can. They owe it to us to come in with the same good will we are extending. The very face Isis has now using a passport making machine demonstrates there are those hoping to get past our security. This is the time we should be slowing down not speeding up immigration.

Nathan – ‘Welfare bums live on $600/mon’
That is not one the smartest things that I have ever read. . It is easy for a Muslim welfare bum with 4 kids to leave a large carbon foot print . Everything is free so they just crank the heat to the max and if gets too hot -then they just open a window and warm up the Planet.

Wow, not one person thought i had the right idea, that fact alone says Islam will have no problem taking
this country. It’s actually laughable. At this point i have to say Canada is worse off that the Us.
Because they at least acknowledge that they have a problem, Anne Coulter, Rush limbaugh, Hannity,
Donald J Trump.(SUPERHERO ) Hope he helps clean this mess up.
Canada, when you have no serious comments against EVIL islam. Liberals have officially taken
the country and you can be sure Turdo will bring in as many Mooslims as he can to make
a new voting block to ENSURELIBERALDOMINANCE for the next 50 to 100 years.KISSCANADA Gooodbye.

Yes. Kevin C—-If you really care about sustaining the Planet—- then you must also realize that if Canada is help save the Planet then we must be harsh and suspend ALL Immigration , especially , for people that have a small Carbon footprint.
It is cold up here in Canada. People that live on welfare tend to leave a really BIG carbon footprint.

The wedge between Muslims and non-Muslims is called the Koran. The prophet Mohammed put it there. It has been there since the creation of Islam. Among other things, it prohibits Muslims from having true friendships with non-Muslims. Slavery is acceptable in Islam. Every Muslim has the right to own slaves. Islam is intolerant of all other religions. The wedge between Muslims and non-Muslims has been in place for 1400 years before the creation of ISIS. The war between Muslims and non-Muslims has been going on since the creation of Islam.

Edward Jobin, how far should we go to put the safety of our citizens first? What’s the line? If we want to go to the extreme then we will ban all immigration from every country, because one of those immigrants, someday, might break the law. Maybe we should build a wall (and make someone else pay for it). There is a risk benefit analysis involved and I believe that the benefits outweigh the risks when bringing refugees into out country. I’m done for tonight, goodnight and well wishes.

Kevin C I have no problem helping legitimate refugees but this requires making intelligent choices putting the safety of our citizens first. We also need to make an honest assessment about how well immigration is working in other countries and what our capabilities are and are not. If we rush to make the wrong decision we will have no recourse. What I am disturbed by is the media not wanting to address the real problems occurring in Europe, the denial of Muslim ghettos or as it has been referred to and angrily denied “no go zones” or rape gangs. I am not very encouraged to see our government making the same mistakes by having Muslim only buildings paid for by the tax payer but also the preferential treatment being given to immigrants. These bad decisions can be the very catalyst for not only a back lash against Muslims but the beginning our own Muslim ghettos. This is one social experiment we cannot afford to get wrong. Again these determinations we must make free from outside pressure or fear of being called bigots. When Germany waged war against us we did not allow them to dictate what our immigration policy should be. I am not suggesting all Muslims are at war with us or that we are at war with all Muslims however if we need to pause and figure out “what the Hell is going on” to quote Trump that is our prerogative. It is an uncomfortable position no doubt but the alternative could be much more uncomfortable

Edward Jobin: I don’t feel, and many people don’t feel that there is a need to take protective measures against Muslims. ISIS wants us to ban Muslims! You hear what i’m saying about ISIS wanting to use anything to create a wedge issue between Muslims and non-Muslims, that’s good. I don’t pretend to have all the answers, but helping the refugees, in my opinion, is a step toward winning the fight against terrorism. We all want the same thing, we want to stop terrorism. Turning our back to refugees will not do anything to help solve the problem, it will make the problem bigger.

Charleton G: “Kevin C in my B. com I studied statistics so tell me something I don’t understand moron!
What scares me is his illiterate people are when Trump made that statement. That includes several Republicans. A TEMPORARY suspension from Muslin countries is not racist and in fact would meet a conditional challenge. Religion can be a factor in the ban.”

LOL if you studied statistics then you would be laughing at the poll that Trump and Levant are citing. Either that or you studied statistics and failed miserably. Here’s a statistic for you…if you compare the rate of ice cream sales to the rate of drowning deaths in North America you will find that as Ice Cream sales go up, so does drowning deaths. Is it ice creams fault that people drown? Should we ban ice cream? How many people die every year from drowning? Children die!!! It’s absolutely infuriating. Let me tell you, if I see any ice cream i’m going to f%^king burn it!

Kevin C: I hear what you are saying about Isis wanting to use anything to create a wedge issue between Muslims and non-Muslims however we cannot allow them to determine what our immigration and foreign policies are. If we feel the need to take protective measures for a period of time that is our decision to make and we cannot allow others to manipulate us because we are afraid someone will try to use our decisions to make us look a certain way. During the world wars we stopped immigration from Germany and it wasn’t until 1950 that we started receiving German immigrants again. Does that mean everyone who wanted to come to Canada meant us harm? Not at all but until we defeated the enemy this was the prudent action to take.

CHARLETON G the imbecile commented 3 hours ago: Ezra it is amazing how well you read. You are dead on the money. I’m embarrassed for people in Canada and the US who can’t understand English. Thank you for your cleat voice. What exactly is a cleat voice?

If a ban had been placed on Muslims after the WTC bombing in 1993, as it should have been, 9/11 would have been prevented and all the suffering and expense over the last 14 years would not have occurred. There have been 75 Muslim terrorist plots in the U.S. since 9/11 the vast majority of which have been foiled. The FBI is now tracking 900 potential terrorists inside the United States and has investigations in all 50 States. There is no justification for Muslim immigration. At worst you are getting a terrorist. At best you are getting a Sharia loving enabler. Yes an enabler. Every Muslim is or should be aware of the many calls to Jihad contained in the Koran. It is these commands which cause Muslims to engage in Jihad. Every Muslim is an enabler.