tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post9107583118875178418..comments2018-02-17T19:45:49.280-05:00Comments on <center>Sandwalk</center>: Happy Darwin Day 2018!Laurence A. Moranhttps://plus.google.com/116237327501105508655noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-67571525894405187522018-02-13T00:33:54.198-05:002018-02-13T00:33:54.198-05:00Darwin was greatest? I don&#39;t agree there is a ...Darwin was greatest? I don&#39;t agree there is a greatest scientist, or even scientist!<br />If people intellectually do something , then it would be in creating things as opposed top figuring things out ALREADY created.<br />I think inventors are better &#39;scientists&quot;.Not newton/Einstein. not even close is dArwin as a creationist would say.<br /><br />Darwin is famous for evolutionary biology.<br />Documenting evolution/common descent is only a hypothesis of his. its not documented but only a interpretation of data.<br />I don&#39;t see natural selection as plausible as in fact its trivial. its mutationism that is the origin of biology complexity/diversity according to evolutionism.<br />It should be tauight that its mutations that turn fish into rhinos. Selection is not the important thing for change. <br />Selection working on tiny changes to change populations will not do the glory.<br />The mutation is the mechanism mostly.<br />Anyways in the English speaking world evolution is rejection in whole or part by hundreds of millions. Even if accepted by the hundreds of millions of others.<br />It still is not persuasive and declining in our time.<br /><br />Robert Byershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05631863870635096770noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-69127322674616481222018-02-12T21:02:59.631-05:002018-02-12T21:02:59.631-05:00Re William Spearshake
Actually it would be more a...Re William Spearshake<br /><br />Actually it would be more accurate to describe Newton as an Arian as he rejected the Trinity and was dubious as to the divinity of Yeshua ben Yusef of Nazareth.colnago80https://www.blogger.com/profile/02640567775340860582noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-26189024037087201172018-02-12T18:11:28.644-05:002018-02-12T18:11:28.644-05:00“Darwin was one of the three most important scient...“<i>Darwin was one of the three most important scientists who have thus far live, the others being <br />Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein.”</i><br /><br />Agreed. But Newton was an a**hole as a person. Yet the IDists keep dragging him out as a great scientist (which he was) because he was Christian. Why don’t they also own the fact that he was a terrible human being because he was Christian. You can’t take credit for one without taking credit for the other. William Spearshakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09354659259971103985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-875332593117588532018-02-12T17:13:44.069-05:002018-02-12T17:13:44.069-05:00Darwin was one of the three most important scienti...Darwin was one of the three most important scientists who have thus far live, the others being <br />Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein..colnago80https://www.blogger.com/profile/02640567775340860582noreply@blogger.com