We would lose so much if we were to force all cultures to let go of their uniqueness and conform to one society.

I suspect only the bad parts of our cultures to be lost - dogma, tribalism, ignorance.

I'm not advocating coercion of any kind, unless you equate education with force. Society doesn't owe you any more than you contribute. Society's benefits are a result of knowledge. To be willfully ignorant is to remove one's self from society.

Quote:

We are doomed if we cannot produce intelligent free thinking people.

I couldn't agree more.

Quote:

I don't think I would feel safe risking a face-to-face encounter with someone who supports killing my race.

I certainly don't support killing anyone. With regard to the subtext - I want to ensure the survival of all the beneficial/benign aspects of every culture. There may be negative or detrimental aspects of your culture that you wish to see preserved. I can't abide this.

The murderer objects to the others' desires to see his actions stopped, but screw what he wants. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.

Quote:

I would just order my coffee, pay, and leave.

Ugh, coffee. Are you insinuating that I work at a coffee shop? What makes you think that? Coffee's bad for you by the way.

I hate being cynical and facetious, but you're not engaged in legitimate discussion.

I would say to you to prove that you practice what you preach! Move to Africa and live with the Bushman!

You know, race doesn't exist, culture doesn't exist, the only thing that matters is to be nice. I guarantee to you that the Bushman are very nice people. No racism, no violence, only niceness. Must be a paradise for you.

My response doesn't change just because there's a computer connection.

My response is: I don't want it.

It's possible you give a negative reading to the Ninth Amendment. You may not think there's a freedom of association. You seem to apply a proscriptive "freedom from discrimination" instead. Nevermind that that sort of limitation was used in the Constitution to restrict government encroachment rather than to curtail the rights of man (since all rights were given by God, only He could take them away).

It's not possible to have freedom of association without freedom to discriminate. One principle of logic is that preference is exclusion. If I prefer to live among whites, I exclude nonwhites. However, your way also is a preference, and it excludes my way. If you force nonwhites into my presence -- such as by denying me the ability to accomplish discrimination -- you exclude the possibility of me living in an all-white community, region, nation, or continent. You didn't ask me whether I want that. You simply assume for yourself the right to make decisions for me.

I'm not a felon. I don't live in prison. I would not willingly choose to live surrounded by wood-and-stucco cages of 50-IQ drug addicts and dealers, pimps and prostitutes, juvenile delinquents, homosexuals and child molesters, foreigners with foreign tongues with whom I cannot converse, and above all else, people who are not white, hate whites, and have their eyes out for opportunities to make trouble for me. Yet that is what the Government and property speculators decided for me with their Section 8 social engineering. I'm not happy with their choice. I moved here to stay away from all that. I don't want everything that's good and honorable and desirable about my neighborhood to be melted down in a cauldron of despair. Yet this place became another melting pot from which I will soon flee. That is the choice imposed upon me: "go away, go away forever, you and everyone who looks like you, no place will be free of us."

In the end, the only freedom you offer is the freedom for my people to disappear from the face of the Earth. And that is no freedom at all.

BarkleyD, I would like for you to do a Google search using the words "feeble roar of the hybrid lions", it is a BBC news article showing the dangers of hybridizing. Honestly, human survival as a species is greater if we continue to have different subspecies aka races. Different races are more immune to different diseases. A good example would be how the mongoloids who peopled the Americas were susceptible to small pox yet immune to syphulus, while Europeans are the opposite. There have also been studies that those of us who's ancestors survived the plague that hit Europe have a resistance to HIV and that is greater when it was both of our parents. If we all mix the races and become the same, not only will we kill most antis dream of multiculturalism, we put all of our eggs in one basket when it comes to diseases and such. Also, strife and war are the way that we as collective humans get stronger and control population.

Oh look, a female African is walking down the street carrying a basket of bananas on her head, and a naked African male is carrying a spear to go hunt in the wood. Oh wait, this is America, so that doesn't happen, because multiculturalism has eradicated black's African culture which they lived with for thousands of years, and instead they are walking to Walmart to buy liquor (which will most likely lead to some sort of domestic abuse).

I'm sure you won't understand this analogy, but for the sake of the world, please try.

In Europe, the homeland of the white race (where I live) third world foreigners move in by the MILLIONS, start off immigrants, and when their children are born, this generation of black and brown people are no longer African, or Asian etc, They are black and brown 'Europeans'?...NO!

Europe belongs to the white race, not third worlders, regardless of whether they are born in Europe or not.