Prof Alan McHughen of the University of Saskatchewan is the author of
'Pandora's Picnic Basket, the Potential and Hazards of Genetically Modified
Foods'.

McHughen claims to expose myths and misunderstandings about GE and its
applications. While complaining of the low level of debate on this issue
in the UK, McHugen praises the Canadian regulatory system - a system which
has been rocked by a series of scandals over its manner of approval of
GE products. (see for example:
http://members.tripod.com/~ngin/fsa.htm)

McHughen calls on us not to be distracted by "sensational scare stories"
but to make sure that we are "aware of the real hazards". As the article
below makes plain, however, even when dealing wih his own pet subject,
McHughen himself seems aware, at best, of only part of the story.

That's assuming, of course, that one regards plant material containing
plastics and/or pharmaceuticals going into animal feed as a problem.

***

http://www.agbios.com/_NewsItem.asp?parm=neIDXCode&data=2409

Flax growers reject GM proposal

The Western Producer
Sean Pratt
Thursday November 1, 2001

Imagine the hullabaloo if the genetically modified canola that has cropped
up in conventional fields in recent years was a variety designed to make
plastics or pharmaceuticals.

That`s a scenario one GM expert is trying to prevent.

University of Saskatchewan professor Alan McHughen wants research into
GM crops that produce high-value industrial products shifted from canola
to another oilseed.

"I'd like to encourage more people to look at flax as the host for some
of these things," said McHughen, who has written a book about the potential
and hazards of GM food.

He said flax is a better fit for these kinds of applications because
it is already primarily used for industrial purposes rather than human
consumption.

"One could envisage all sorts of damage being wrought if by mistake
a genetically engineered pharmaceutical-producing canola seed got into
the regular oilseed type canola."

But it wouldn't be as big a problem, he added, if flaxseed genetically
modified to be made into plastic or drugs was mistakenly introduced into
commercial flax lines. Instead of landing on someone's dinner plate, it
would end up in a can of paint or a sheet of linoleum.

Chris Hale, president of Flax Growers Western Canada, said that line
of thinking shows a "clear misunderstanding" of flax markets.

He said Europe, which is "far and away" the biggest importer of Canadian
flax, requires an assurance from the Canadian Grain Commission that no
GM flax is grown here.

Hale said flax exported to Europe is used for industrial purposes, but
the residue is fed to livestock.

"If you don't think Europeans are super sensitive about what they're
feeding their livestock, I guess a little more research needs to be done."

The flax industry has fought the introduction of GM crops. It managed
to get CDC Triffid, a chemical-resistant variety developed by McHughen,
banned from commercial production. They don`t want to see more research
on GM flax in the near future.

"We would not support and very likely actively resist or lobby against
that sort of work being done in the short term," Hale said.

McHughen said a line of flax that could produce plastics or drugs would
be a high-value crop. Manufacturers would pay big money for biodegradable
plastic or pharmaceuticals that could be produced without having to harvest
plants from South America's Amazon Basin.

One of the reasons he is convinced that flax is a better candidate than
canola for this type of research is that pollen drift isn't a problem with
flax.

"It doesn't have that outcrossing problem, so you have a much greater
degree of confidence that when you grow the specialty crop in a particular
area, it`s going to stay there."

Perhaps more importantly, introducing a new kind of flax to be used
for industrial purposes doesn`t take a food crop out of production. The
same can't be said for canola, he said.