It started with fraud in falsifying decisions documents, then fraud in claiming that the court file was "shredded", now continued with refusal to provide the documentation, prescribed by law, of the "shredding"...

Figures: The Supreme Court engaged in fraud relative to request to inspect the Franco-Sidi court file - claiming that the file had been "shredded". The court file most likely includes direct evidence of the perversion of IT system of the Supreme Court starting in 2002. Now, Presiding Justice Miriam Noar and Chief State Archivist refuse to answer on repeat request to present the documentation, prescribed by law, of the purported shredding... In the latest episode, the State Archives provide a nonsensical response by the Supreme Court's "Chief Clerk" (Ms Idit Melul - an impostor with no lawful appointment).

On March 23, 2016, I first inquired with you regarding the physical state of the court file in reference, pursuant to the Regulations of the Archives - Maintenance and Shredding of Court Files (1986): [1]

a) Is the court file in reference maintained in the State Archive, or was it shredded?

b) In case it was shredded: Was a notice published in the State Registry (Reshumot) regarding this court file? Is there a protocol of the shredding of this court file?

2. March 24, 2016 email notice from Mr Eli Ashash at Administration of Courts, saying that the matter was forwarded for his handling. In my March 24, 2016 response, [2] I clarified that the matter is not under the authority of the Administration of Courts, and again asked for your response on my questions a) and b), above.

3) March 27, 2016 email notice from Ms Helena Vilenski, Archivist and Reading Room Supervisor at State Archive (copied above), saying: 'Enclosed is response by Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court: “Matter pertains to civil appeal court file, since the inquirer is not a party in the court file, he is not permitted to inspect the court file”.'

The “Chief Clerk” was not named in this message, and the “Chief Clerk's” message was not attached to the message either. On the matter itself: My questions pertain to upholding the Regulations of the Archives by the State Archivist. The “Chief Clerk”'s response fails to address my questions at all.

Therefore, I again request your response, as State Archivist, on questions a) and b), above.

English abstract:
In the Sidi-Franco court file (pertaining to holocaust survivors) evidence exists for falsification and perversion of records and process in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court unlawfully denies access to inspect the file, claiming that it was "shredded". Now, a source in the State Archive confirms what was clear all along: The files of the Supreme Court are not shredded at all... The fraud and misprision of felonies in this case directly involves Supreme Court Presiding Justice Miriam Naor.
See previous post on this subject: http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/03/2016-03-24-what-is-israeli-supreme.html

11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http:// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...

What did the experts say?

* דוח סייג לזכויות האדם נכלל בדוח התקופתי של האו"ם לגבי זכויות האדם בישראל (2013), בלוויית ההערה: "חוסר יושרה בכתבים האלקטרוניים של בית המשפט העליון, בתי המשפט המחוזיים, ובתי הדין למוחזקי משמורת בישראל".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in the United States, with the note: "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in Israel, with the note: "lack of integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel."

The United States

* "...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* Los Angeles County is"the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."FBI (2004)

* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)

* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/239647129/The HRA submission was incorporated into the 2015 HRC Professional Staff Report on the United States with the note: :“HRA NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.”

[2] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2013 UPR of the State of Israel was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees' courts in Israel".

2012-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the

[3] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."

2010-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the

2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:

[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/http://www.scribd.com/doc/108663259/