by acknowledging more than one point of view. Not all Christians believe a specific interpretation of what the book of Genesis reads.

But you seem to be under the impression that your interpretation of Genesis (and the Bible) is the only possible valid interpretation. You discount any other interpretation with an elitist attitude, thank quite frankly, comes off as abrasive.

__________________
I'm here to kick butt and chew bubble gum... and I'm all out of bubble gum!

But you seem to be under the impression that your interpretation of Genesis (and the Bible) is the only possible valid interpretation. You discount any other interpretation with an elitist attitude, thank quite frankly, comes off as abrasive.

I apologize if that's how you understood it. that is not how I meant it. the point I was making is that there are more than one interpretation, and that not all believe in an interpretation that excludes science.

__________________Brent "RamboPreacher" Hoefling
Founder of the CPPA - Christian Paintball Players Association
Member of: † Christ † Krew † #82"I believe, in order to understand" or "I understand in order to believe": Augustine/Anselm (paraphrase)
"Science, and especially physics is not about 'truths' - It's about forming beliefs that are less false"; Dr. S. James Gates, Jr.

Lol, if "everyone's talking about it" it's already a story. I'm just saying that the majority of the media are very unprofessional in their research (or lack thereof) as well as being more interested in ratings than truth.

I do like Lou Dobbs though. He tells it like it is, he doesn't put a conservative or liberal tint on anything. He's a true independent.

What I meant to say was, I think the media creates stories, and pushes things people don't really care about, and makes them stories.

What I meant to say was, I think the media creates stories, and pushes things people don't really care about, and makes them stories.

You don't understand. Here are your three posts in chronological order. It's not an opinion; it's undeniable logical fact.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pimpinsaylor

Either it recreates the big bang, or it has failed.

So this first trial has failed, and they're going to try the other two options now?

Quote:

Originally Posted by pimpinsaylor

Oh I see. The way the news was making it out is that they had already tried it to the full extent.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pimpinsaylor

I agree completely.

I think they create stories "everyone is talking about", and that in turn makes the view seem popular.

As you can clearly see, you first tout specific knowledge of what the experiment is supposed to accomplish. Information you obviously gleaned from the news media you so categorically renounce as attempting to influence the populace.

Guess what? You just identified yourself as the sheep in that equation. Get a clue?

ssgaR:I genuinely dislike this derr guy. •• GE: Derr gets laid more often than you masturbate. *Nevar Forget*TheMahone2491: Dont worry no matter what you say almighty Derr knows what YOU are thinking when you write your posts.corporationpaintball: Derr has high standards, but to meet those standards should be a goal that you move towards because it will not only better your life in the long run, but the lives of those you are in contact with on an intellectual level.

And there's no use in fearing it. If that black hole were to be created, I would do a ****ing cannonball into it. There is no ****ing cooler way to die than doing a cannon ball into a ****ing black hole

A black hole would suck in everything before we even knew anything went wrong

I got some sciency questions maybe you guys can answer. 1, If light has no mass, how is it affected by the gravity of a black hole? 2, They say the micro black holes would be short lived. How exactly does a black hole end? Ihe particles become so dense that nothing can escape its reach, what exactly would pull them apart?

A black hole would suck in everything before we even knew anything went wrong

we have already made black holes in other particle excelerators. and even if we created another black hole and it had taken up as much energy as the earth it would still only be big enough to have a few pulling power to atract things a few inches away from the core, with the size somewhere around the size of a pea. so now, if they creat a black hole with only particals, it wouldn't have enough energy to do much of anything.

__________________
The list of epic, I was there
7-11-09 Can I tap that?
9-11-08 My Thoughts on People
7-27-07 we witnessed /b/ fall
6-21-06 10pm real radio hide out
1-16-05 Parent PORNO
ST; S Snowboard Thread - Just leave, we don't want you. Go talk about snowboard in some other fourm.

I got some sciency questions maybe you guys can answer. 1, If light has no mass, how is it affected by the gravity of a black hole? 2, They say the micro black holes would be short lived. How exactly does a black hole end? Ihe particles become so dense that nothing can escape its reach, what exactly would pull them apart?

1. General Relativity.

2. Black holes convert mass into radiation. The rate of radiation increases as mass decreases. As time passes, the mass of the black hole decreases to zero and it effectively evaporates.

ssgaR:I genuinely dislike this derr guy. •• GE: Derr gets laid more often than you masturbate. *Nevar Forget*TheMahone2491: Dont worry no matter what you say almighty Derr knows what YOU are thinking when you write your posts.corporationpaintball: Derr has high standards, but to meet those standards should be a goal that you move towards because it will not only better your life in the long run, but the lives of those you are in contact with on an intellectual level.

You don't understand. Here are your three posts in chronological order. It's not an opinion; it's undeniable logical fact.

As you can clearly see, you first tout specific knowledge of what the experiment is supposed to accomplish. Information you obviously gleaned from the news media you so categorically renounce as attempting to influence the populace.

Guess what? You just identified yourself as the sheep in that equation. Get a clue?

I argued that the media twists things to seem as they are something they are not, or as something the general populace does not know or care about.

I made statement one based on the knowledge from the media, since I haven't been paying attention to the project since sometime last year.

ssgaR:I genuinely dislike this derr guy. •• GE: Derr gets laid more often than you masturbate. *Nevar Forget*TheMahone2491: Dont worry no matter what you say almighty Derr knows what YOU are thinking when you write your posts.corporationpaintball: Derr has high standards, but to meet those standards should be a goal that you move towards because it will not only better your life in the long run, but the lives of those you are in contact with on an intellectual level.

__________________
Originally posted by Frank112916: "what makes an initiation of force 'illegitimate'? Why can we not initiate force is some ways but not in others if it makes us better off?"

"Unless we can make the philosophic foundations of a free society once more a living intellectual issue, and its implementation a task which challenges the ingenuity and imagination of our liveliest minds, the prospects of freedom are indeed dark. But if we can regain that belief in power of ideas which was the mark of liberalism at its best, the battle is not lost." - F. A. Hayek

USNavyBallerUL'd 07 PMR F/S, PM me if interested!#12ItalianBaller“The real test of a man is not how well he plays the role he has invented for himself, but how well he plays the role that destiny assigned to him.”
-Václav Havel