Welcome to the home of The Question Evolution Project. Presenting information demonstrating that there is no truth in minerals-to-man evolution, and presenting evidence for special creation. —Established by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

Thursday, January 3, 2019

Landforms Indicate Thin Ice Sheets

Secular geologists not only believe that the earth is billions of
years old, but that it had dozens of ice ages. Those are easy to invoke
since a later ice age effectively obliterates whatever happened
previously. Biblical creationists postulate only one Ice Age which was
caused by the global Genesis Flood. Landforms in Scandinavia and Britain
indicate thin ice sheets, contrary to secular views.

I wanted to check out the landforms in Norway but needed to rent a car. My preference was a Fjord Mustang —"That's dreadful, Cowboy Bob!"Oh, I thought you'd take a viking to that one. Moving on...Geologists
have ideas about ice sheets in Scandinavia and Britain, but their views and numerous assumptions
are not supported by observed evidence. In addition, they rely on the
Milankovitch (or astronomical) theory of ice ages and for scare tactics of climate change proponents. They still saddle up
those faulty ideas because their impetus is the narrative, not the
facts; the Milankovitch idea has been fundamentally flawed for decades,
and its supporting Pacemaker idea has been refuted. Creation science views potentially explain much of what has been found, including why fjords are deeper closer to the mountains than they are toward the sea.

Just
like the Laurentide Ice Sheet, the Scandinavian and British-Irish Ice
Sheets were much thinner than the Antarctic Ice Sheet, which is used as
an analogue for ice sheet thickness by uniformitarian scientists. This
supports a higher sea level minimum in the creation science Ice Age
model. The evidence for much thinner ice sheets in Europe includes tors,
relatively thick soils, saprolite, blockfields, and slightly modified
drainage features within the area covered by the ice sheets. These
non-glacial landforms are even found at the proposed centre of the
Scandinavian Ice Sheet over north-east Sweden that extends into northern
Finland. To preserve such landforms, the ice sheet in these areas must
have eroded the substrate very little over a few million years. Secular
scientists are convinced the Scandinavian Ice Sheet was up to 3–4 km
thick, and are forced to conclude these areas had been covered by
cold-based ice, which causes little erosion. Nunataks are supposed to
have protruded above the ice sheets, but uniformitarian scientists are
forced to claim that the trimlines on nunataks are the boundary between
warm ice below and cold ice above, instead of the boundary between ice
below and no ice above. Some of the delicate pre-glacial features can
potentially be explained by late Flood events and the unique post-Flood
Ice Age.