The Sandy Hook School Tragedy: Was There A Second Shooter?

Beginning and End has covered the tragedy and devastation of the shooting murders at Sandy Hook Elementary school in Connecticut, one of the worst mass murders in American history. Adam Lanza, the alleged shooter who committed suicide in the school building has become the face of the entire attack. However, lost in the mainstream media coverage were the initial reports of a second shooter at the scene of the crime. And thus the question remains: was there possibly a second shooter involved in this crime?

In the wake of an attack, shooting or large scale tragedy, the initial media reports, often carry a great deal of information that is later filtered out as the media generally adopts a single narrative to explain a story. In the case of the Sandy Hook shooting, media coverage was all over the place in reporting accurate and inaccurate information. However, what seems to be clear is that at least initially there were many clear and credible reports of a second shooting suspect, who fled the scene and was apprehended by authorities. Here are some examples:

Here is a CBS news anchor and a correspondent on the morning of Friday, December 14th, openly talking about the second suspect:

Notice that not only was there a second suspect but they report that he was in custody.

Here is CBS News again reporting, from the scene of the crime, referencing the second shooting suspect.

The CBS local affiliate’s news website also reported on the second suspect being apprehended and added the details that his home was being searched:

CBS News reports that a potential second suspect was in custody and that SWAT was investigating the home of the suspect. It was not known if that alleged second suspect fired any of the shots in the massacre.

A witness tells WFSB-TV that a second man was taken out of the woods in handcuffs wearing a black jacket and camouflage pants and telling parents on the scene, “I did not do it.” (source).

The Sky Valley Chronicle then reported that a man fitting the description provided by the eye witness of the second shooter, was in the building:

Broadcast reports from the scene say the gunman reportedly walked into the school wearing camouflage pants and opened fire in one room killing the principal and an unknown number of other adults and then moved into to classrooms shooting at students and teachers in those rooms. (source)

The UK Telegraph, reported on Adam Lanza, who was wearing black fatigues and the second gunman who also wore camouflage pants as two different people:

The gunman, wearing black fatigues and a military-style vest, was found dead in a classroom, but it was not clear whether he took his own life or was shot by police. A second man wearing camouflage trousers was seen being handcuffed. One witness described him shouting: “I didn’t do it.” (source)

It is interesting to note that this second suspect happened to not only be right in the direct vicinity of the school at the time the shooting happened, he was also aware of the shooting, since as he was being walked to the police car, he knew enough information to tell parents “I didn’t do it.” Here is another witness, a student at Sandy Hook who was in the building during the shooting, who also reports seeing a second suspect in handcuffs.

Again, it is possible that this person who was apprehended had no involvement in the shooting. But for the amount of media coverage and global attention this case has received, why is that not one police press conference or official report has mentioned just who this second man was?

Here is a local news team, in the very early moments after the shooting ended, reporting live from the school and again make reference to the second shooter and the very odd coincidence that the second suspect and Adam Lanza were both wearing camouflage pants:

While there can be no definite conclusions drawn from these reports, it certainly raises the question of why no mainstream media outlet has picked up on this story or just raised the question to authorities. The Bible is clear though that as the world approaches the end times and the coming New World Order that will come along with it, a major sign will be unparalleled deception: “ But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.”– (2 Timothy 3:13). In times of extreme tragedy, emotions run very high and it is thus even easier to accept any version of “the facts” that is being given. And the Sandy Hook tragedy is a perfect example as the media has gotten numerous details of this case wrong – whether the shooter was Adam Lanza or his brother Ryan. Reporting that Nancy Lanza, Adam’s mother, worked at the school. Reporting that , Peter Lanza , Adam Lanza’s father was murdered in his New Jersey home.

How so many basic details were incorrect in a contained story of a set event is unknown. But the discerning reader should know to use proper wisdom and understand that even the media can make glaring errors or promote a specific agenda in their reporting. Do not be deceived. This is possible one reason when it comes to incidents like these that people feel like it is in the best interst of the public to know what’s going on. By investing in devices like a police scanner and choosing to learn more, it may help put your mind at ease when it comes to knowing what’s going on in your community and hearing accurate information.

Continue in prayer for the victims of this tragedy and for the public to receive the accurate truth. But most importantly, that regardless of what further information come out about the story that people will look to the real truth, that never changes: and that is the truth of Jesus Christ, God in the flesh, who came to this world to give His life for all of the sins, lies, murders, attacks, hatred and all manner of evil that all people have committed. And in believing in His sacrifice as the payment to God for one’s sins, there is forgiveness and eternal life.

Below is an Infowars report on the possibility of a second shooter that also plays some of the police scanner audio and video footage in which officers on the scene reference more than one shooter.

Reader Interactions

Comments

I couldn’t agree more, Adam Lanza was just a patsy basically. Yet another false flag by the elites to strip us of our firearms and institute world domination against righteous and freedom loving people. IMPEACH OBAMA wh.gov/PXF3 God bless.

You dont need 30 guns in your house to protect yourself, just one. However all the dumb tree huggin hippy liberals like yourself think nobody except our gov. should have guns. Which governments around the world the past 60 years are responsible for about 400 million deaths with the american gov. claiming close to 300 million of those deaths. Honestly, im not really anti-obama, if it was Mitt Romney doing this I would ask him to be impeached as well. The constitution was made by our forefathers to keep things like this from happening, as they said, these rights were not given to men by men, but these were God given rights, rights that cannot be taken away,not even from a dictator or tyrant or king etc… And if i wanted 30 guns in my house I have that right and nobody can tell me otherwise.

I’m 31 years old and literally have never held a real gun in my life yet by some act of God I am still alive.. I will never understand the need of you Americans to have to be “strapped” at all times..

If there are less guns on the street then there will be less deaths by guns.. it’s not that difficult to figure out.. You thin you owning guns is going to affect decision making by Obama or any other president? Really?? Give me a break..

As for the questions brought up regarding this second shooter at Sandy Hook, this is something I would like to know more about. There were similar questions at Columbine and 9/11.

Whatever the truth is, I really don’t think your own gov’t would have children murdered so they can try to ban guns. Just like I don’t think the gov’t was involved with 9/11 so Bush’s buddies would make more money off the search for Bin Laden..

First of all you are widley misinformed. It doesn’t matter to a crazy person whether or not guns are legal, criminals will still get guns, and if someone wants to kill somebody, you dont need a gun, in fact statistics show that more people die a year from f***ing rock attacks than gun attacks. Even if you have less gun violence that doesnt stop all violence. Guns are meant to protect us from tyrants like obama and every one in his legislation. When are people like you going to realize that the only way to stop a bad person with a gun is a good person with a gun. And governments have been doing false flags since the beginning of time to get what they want. And no not the bush admin. but criminal elements of the military industrial complex. The last three dictators i can think of that stripped citizens of their arms are, Stalin, Hitler, and Mao. Look how many of their own people they ended up slaughtering.THINK ABOUT IT!

This obviously a waste of time. Less guns means less violence.. Its common sense. Is it going to eliminate crime? Of course not, but its not going to add to it. You sound like one of the NRA lunatics who actually think the answer is to have all the teachers have guns in their desk drawers.. I’m sure Obama wants to strip you of guns so he can slaughter you lmao.. But of course Bush did no wrong.. The guy can’t even spell his name. I’ll let you get back to sitting in your lazy boy sucking back Budweiser watching NASCAR while draped in a confederate flag waiting for the day when white power will rule again!

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed with blood of tyrants and patriots alike from time to time.” Thomas Jefferson “What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? ” Thomas Jefferson “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. ” Thomas Jefferson “The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. ” Thomas Jefferson “They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.” Benjamin Franklin “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!” Benjamin Franklin “Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of God and nature.” Benjamin Franklin “The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home.” James Madison “It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government.” Thomas Paine “Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.” William Penn “Firearms are second only to the constitution in importance; they are the peoples’ liberty’s teeth” George Washington We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Declaration of Independence IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776 Look man, our forefathers knew this was going to happen, and if they thought like you do, then we would still be under control of Great Britain, or even the Nazis because they would of over taken Britain.But thats besides the point, armed citizens are the one thing that has protected people in the past from suppressive gov”s. Whether its bow and arrows, swords, muskets or semi-auto assualt rifles, we need to stop arguing and fighting each other and go after the real suppressor here, know what im saying.

aaaahhhhhhh, cat got your tounge. Its great when you throw founding fathers quotes out there about the second ammendment and tyranny in government, all the stupid liberals have nothing to argue or say.HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Freedom will prevail. GOD BLESS

as i said before, its a waste of time arguing with you. You’d rather see countless Americans die needlessly as long as you get to shine up your rifle. throw your white hood on, I think you’re late for the meeting.

Why do you always revert back to racism, its ridiculous. What, because i reserve my 2nd amendment right and own a gun that makes me a racist? You talk about saving lives and saving the lives of children, however im sure you support planned parenthood who has murdered 55 plus million babies in the past like 40 years. Can you spell hypocrite.This is a prime example of exactly whats wrong with this country, too many people worried about what everybody else is doing, my gun has never hurt anybody, it stays safely locked up in my closet until I take it to the range. People like you have already ruined states like California, and New York and ill be damned if you think you can ruin mine with your stupid liberal views. And if someone really wants to kill somebody, YOU DONT NEED A GUN, they will just use a knife or a sword or whatever else is around. Criminals are still going to have guns, but with law -abiding responsible citizens like my self, we have the ability to stop armed criminals.

These dictators promoted GUN CONTROL. “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.” – Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942 Nazi Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated. “If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves.” – Joseph Stalin In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. By 1987 that figure had risen to 61,911,000. “All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.” – Mao Tze Tung, Nov 6 1938 China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952 10,076,000 political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated in Kuomintang China, and by 1987 another 35,236,000 exterminations were carried out under the Communists. “I did not join the resistance movement to kill people, to kill the nation. Look at me now. Am I a savage person? My conscience is clear.” – Pol Pot Cambodia established gun control in 1956. Between 1975 and 1979, 2,035,000 “educated” people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Lovers of freedom promote GUN RIGHTS. “A free people ought to be armed.” – George Washington “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government” – Thomas Jefferson “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry “Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self defense.” – John Adams “To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason “Americans have the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the people of other countries, whose leaders are afraid to trust them with arms.” – James Madison “Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt “The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster “If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun.” – The Dalai Lama “Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest. If we want the Arms Act to be repealed, if we want to learn the use of arms, here is a golden opportunity. If the middle classes render voluntary help to Government in the hour of its trial, distrust will disappear, and the ban on possessing arms will be withdrawn.” – Mohandas K. Gandhi “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, Initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights

Hoorah, Collin, you tell it like it is! Enjoyed reading your aggressive, “bulldog” attack against the flimsy arguments of a bleeding heart liberal. When Bill O’Reilly retires, I nominate you to fill his his spot 🙂

Well thank you sir, I appreciate that very much. I swear sometimes its like arguing with a two year old. They revert to name calling because they have no facts to argue. Patriots like you and me sir will keep this country going, if God is willing of course. Notice he hasnt responded to any of the facts I have put up recently, and chances are if he does, again he will accuse me of being a racist or something of that matter, its ridiculous.

Thank you Candace very much, I dont like calling people dumb liberals or whatever but sometimes I just get so angry at the non existence of moral value that some of them have. As I said before Patriots like you I and Dave can hopefully keep this country going. God Bless you Candace, Dave and everybody at B&E.

I just had a thought about this. Since this is FAKE, there would be no reason to hide a potential second shooter because there wasn’t even a first shooter. So, would it be more likely that this guy was a Witness that the whole thing was FAKE? Did they threaten him of future imprisonment, “letting him off with a warning” and thus hushing him up (but maybe later giving him a “mysterious accident”) so he couldn’t tell what he saw?

The obituaries, funeral arrangements and gravestones disagree with you. Don’t believe me? I was challenged to look into it myself. I found not only the lists of dead children, but their gravestones, their funerals and a lot of other hard facts to ignore. But go ahead, please tell me why it’s fake…

For someone so intent on declaring the “insubstantial” evidence supporting the event at Sandy Hook, you fail to remember that in a court of law, it is the one who has an accusation who MUST submit substantial evidence supporting his claim. If no substantial evidence is found, the charges are dropped and nothing further continues. However, if substantial evidence is brought to the table, THAT is when the defendant is required to provide evidence to the contrary. Seeing that you are the accuser, you must provide evidence to your claim before I had to provide evidence to support mine. Now, since you have decided to reverse the order, I do believe that you failed to follow proper legal and logical procedures in following through on an accusation. Would you like to continue saying that I lack real thinking skills?

While it is obvious that the liberal progressive movement has patronized this unfortunate event as a “soapbox” to further their agenda of totally disarming law abiding American citizens, I also think that one who tries to deny the reality of this tragedy is submitting to a very conspiracy theory agenda . To me, that ranks in the same category as denying the validity of the Holocaust, the lunar space missions, or the World Trade Center/Pentagon terrorist attacks of 9-11-2001!

I’m still waiting for you to come up with evidence that actually substantiates your argument and doesn’t include “faulty search engine” among the claims. Sorry the site isn’t perfect. I’ve searched for graves that I know exist and had to really work around the system and not with it in order to find people I know and where I know they are.

David,

I completely agree. The whole thing went too far as soon as it was used as a political tool.

Go to YouTube and look up “sandy hook hoax” and there’s PLENTY to show that Sandy Hook was a LIE. For one, look at the video of Emilie Parker’s dad all happy and then psyching up before the TV cameras start to roll. For 2, why were the “victims” ILLEGALLY pronounced dead on the spot when the law says a coroner is the only one able to declare them dead? For 3, look at all the videos of the colored triage tarps on the ground and explain why NONE of them ever had any victim on them.

If you bother to educate yourself about the matter and still say it was real, I say you’re part of the cover-up.

Well, if you think that telling you to EDUCATE yourself, when you obviously are UNEDUCATED, that’s your problem. I think it’s “insulting” that you continue to promote this FRAUD as real! Yeah, “verifying the living status of those who were proclaimed dead?” I guess you’re (again) uneducated in knowing about “witness protection” and other sort of things.

I only bother to write to those others who might be reading this. It’s obvious to me you’re here to obfuscate the truth and to get people to not want to EDUCATE themselves!

It’s very interesting that you consider yourself an educated person, yet the furthest research you’ve done are Youtube videos. If all it takes to become an educated person is to watch a few videos on Youtube, then I suppose I could call myself a cryptozooligist, paranormal forensic, demonologist, theologian and countless other professions simply because I’ve spent countless hours watching Youtube videos on the topic.

Stevor, if you fail to provide something more than a video on Youtube, then I fail to see how your stance is substantial. If the videos had any ground towards truth, perhaps you can explain why they haven’t been removed?

Geez, you’re funny (though it’s not nice to laugh at the mentally handicapped). You try to denigrate that my “research” is just YouTube where yours is WHAT? Were you there? Do you have insider info? I consider looking at actual videos of the event to what some clown (you) claims.

Anyhow, you still haven’t addressed those 3 points I said are fake: Daddy Parker laughing before psyching up to the TV camera. Nobody on the triage tarps. Bodies ILLEGALLY declared dead by somebody other than the coroner. (did the coroner even go or did he know it was ALL FAKE and his services wouldn’t be needed?)

Though my previous comments (and replies) have addressed how the whole event was fake, but I guess I ought to address the actual question. Was there a second shooter?

Well, as I said there wasn’t a second because there wasn’t a first. But what of that guy? Here’s a theory that I just came up with today. That guy was not part of the SHAM (FEMA drill) and those who were running the sham didn’t want an outsider. So, they caught him, scared him into thinking they suspected him, and got him to just be quiet (Or he’d end up six feet under if he talked about what he saw – witness to the sham).