Policy On Sex

Sexuality has three parts, the male, female and child. Social Positivists believe in science and science-based thinking this includes forming policy on sex.

Positivists subscribe to sexual dimorphism because any other policy cannot be substantiated or advanced in anything like a rational manner.

The Positivists social policy is based on science and scripture. We believe both are needed to give us a clear picture of the right course to pursue.

The male is the head of the family not just because this is scripturally mandated but because it fits into what can be supported from an objective perspective. Regardless of what allowances are made it is the male who is most able to work, earn a living and protect the family. Nor is he able to replace the female in her role.

In the simplest of terms, the male cannot bear children, nor is he naturally inclined at the level of nurturing a female is inclined to.

In the most extreme circumstances the male is both more expendable and the deadliest; that is the most able to eliminate any threat to the family and least missed if he fails this role. Thus, the format laid out in Scripture makes logical sense.

The child is demonstratable the product of a male and female and so this naturally becomes the preferred family structure for a child to remain in.

Positivists prefer social policy as regards the family remain as close to nature and biology as is possible. Social Positivists will work to support the ability of the conventional family and the roles of its members. This includes block attempts to marginalize or minimalize the family and the role of its members. Social Positivists will institute such barriers and policy as this normal biological structure requires to ensure its smooth and continued function.

We have established social policy on sex education in schools. This can be accessed here.