Milo we are trying to keep down the number of topics on the one hand and not be too restrictive on the other. Your "Russian Hacking" Thread seemed to be an extension of the conversation in the Propaganda thread. Therefore they were merged. We added the name of the new topic you created to the propaganda thread to address your objection. Which assumably was that you don't think the "Russian Hacking" is propaganda.

In our judgement it is two sides of the same coin no matter which side you are looking at. IE either it is really "propaganda" or it is really "Russian Hacking" or it is some combination of both.

Is it not better to have all arguments, both pro and con, in the same place?

Milo we are trying to keep down the number of topics on the one hand and not be too restrictive on the other. Your "Russian Hacking" Thread seemed to be an extension of the conversation in the Propaganda thread. Therefore they were merged. We added the name of the new topic you created to the propaganda thread to address your objection. Which assumably was that you don't think the "Russian Hacking" is propaganda.

In our judgement it is two sides of the same coin no matter which side you are looking at. IE either it is really "propaganda" or it is really "Russian Hacking" or it is some combination of both.

Is it not better to have all arguments, both pro and con, in the same place?