Well, he’s done it. Voreqe Bainimarama has seized his place in history by blitzing his opponents and scoring a decisive win in the first genuinely democratic election in Fiji since Independence 44 years ago. By any standard, it is a remarkable achievement. Because this is no run-of-the-mill election win of the kind the world routinely witnesses, a changing of the political guard under a tried and tested order. Bainimarama not only upended the status quo in Fiji when he seized power eight years ago. He took a sledgehammer to the entire political edifice, smashed it to smithereens and then set about rebuilding Fiji into a modern nation-state that has been transformed at almost every level. And transformed it for the better in the eyes of most Fijian voters, who’ve given the PM an overwhelming mandate to continue his reform program.

In the process, Bainimarama himself has changed – the impatient, sometimes fiery authoritarian figure giving way to a softer, more genial presence who has come to relish his encounters with ordinary people and has taken to being a politician in a way that few would have expected. Watching the Internet feed of the PM’s debate on radio with his principal opponent, Ro Teimumu Kepa, many Fijians would have been surprised to see that it was Bainimarama who was most at ease, smiling as she launched a barrage of provocations in his direction, including “you will soon get your just deserts”. Well yes he has, though not quite in the way the GMBRTD – as some people refer to her by the acronym of her chiefly title – would have expected.

SODELPA LIUMURI-ED

There are many dimensions to this extraordinary saga but none more notable than the way in which Bainimarama has carried indigenous opinion with him and rewritten the political rules in Fiji. For the first time, i’Taukei voters have failed to be swayed by the traditional political weapon of crudely exploiting their fears – fears for their land, their religion, their culture and their way of life. SODELPA tried to wield that weapon with a campaign characterised by some of the worst lies ever told in a Fijian election. They included the former Prime Minister, Laisenia Qarase, openly telling i’Taukei that they would not be able to worship Jesus if FijiFirst won the election. It didn’t work. In fact, there’s ample evidence that it backfired, driving voters into the arms of the PM, who patiently explained that these lies were being told to manipulate i’Taukei opinion while he laid out an alternative vision of inclusiveness and hope.

When the polls over the past few weeks gave Bainimarama a commanding lead, the word from SODELPA was that Frank would be luimuri-ed (betrayed) by his ostensible supporters, who were telling him to his face that they supported him but would vote SODELPA in the privacy of the voting booth. In fact, the reverse happened on Election Day. SODELPA was liumuri-ed by many of those who’d pledged allegiance to it publicly but privately voted for Frank. It is arguably the end of the indigenous scare campaign in Fijian politics. The days of i’Taukei leaders treating their own people as fools are over. And not a moment too soon.

A DIPLOMATIC BLUNDER

The extent of the Bainimarama victory has floored his opponents and much of the diplomatic community, which has never believed the opinion polls showing him with a commanding lead all year. Australia and New Zealand, in particular, have peddled the notion that Bainimarama would be forced into a coalition even if he managed to garner the most votes. It has been yet another in a long line of miscalculations by our bigger neighbours since 2006, most of them based on being captive to the views of the wrong people. The reason why few diplomats saw this result coming is that the local diplomatic community continues to place far too much store on the views of partisan participants in the process and certain local NGOs, who have been overwhelmingly opposed to Bainimarama. One ambassador confided to me that as recently as a few months ago, a senior Australian diplomat was still trying to persuade his diplomatic colleagues of the need to “destroy” the PM. The encounter left this ambassador shaking his head. “You cannot have a democracy without racial equality and only Bainimarama can unite Fiji”, he said.

In the election aftermath, Australia and New Zealand will be hoping to step up their recent attempts to ingratiate themselves with a democratically-elected Bainimarama Government. It isn’t going to be easy. There’s a strong feeling in certain circles that they should be brought to account for their overt attempts to damage Fiji for having the impertinence to chart its own course. Overall relations will remain standoffish, the charm offensive by Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop notwithstanding. Or the positive contribution that Australia has made co-leading the Multinational Observers Group and at the Elections Office, where Michael Clancy has been a valued deputy to Mohammed Saneem, together with a number of others who have played an integral role in the success of this election.

New Zealand, in particular, continues to sorely offend the Fijian establishment with the content of its travel warnings. The latest – updated after the election – urges New Zealanders to be cautious when visiting Fiji and refers to “some risk to your security because of underlying political tensions”. Really? The visiting TV3 correspondent, Amanda Gillies, might have put herself at risk by “door-stopping” the Prime Minister and gratuitously asking him whether he planned another coup (he didn’t hit her, whatever the blogs say). But it would be difficult for any other visiting New Zealander to detect “underlying political tensions”. Yes, the Government’s opponents are decidedly unhappy but the police and military are ready to step in at the first sign of restiveness, let alone civil disturbances. A SODELPA attempt to stage a march through the streets of Suva on Friday afternoon was firmly rejected. Such marches have been the prelude to disturbances in the past and will not be tolerated again.

A SMEAR ON THE JUDICIARY

The latest NZ Travel Warning goes on to make the outrageous claim that “the government has a degree of influence over the judiciary”. Where is the evidence for the truth of this statement? None is given in the advisory. Given the gravity of the charge and its potential impact on public confidence in the judiciary, isn’t it incumbent on the NZ Government to provide the details on which it bases its claim? Because the truth is that no credible evidence has ever been advanced that the executive branch of the Fijian Government influences the judiciary, nor that the judiciary does the Government’s bidding. Indeed the Chief Justice, Anthony Gates, and his fellow judges pride themselves on being fiercely independent, as does Christopher Pryde, the NZ-born Director of Public Prosecutions. Yes, some political figures have been convicted of a range of offences, including former Prime Ministers Laisenia Qarase and Mahendra Chaudry. But they have been convicted solely on the evidence before the courts and there have been no serious legal challenges to the validity of the charges against them.

The CJ and the DPP are highly aggrieved by the NZ accusations and understandably so because of their potential to damage public confidence in the system. Is it that the Kiwis continue to be irritated that Fiji has maintained a functioning judiciary despite all the attempts by Australia and NZ to deter their citizens from taking up posts in Fiji? If NZ wants to have friendly relations with a democratic Fiji, it must stop trying to denigrate and degrade our institutions.

FREE EDUCATION: THE GAME CHANGER

While the diplomatic miscalculations have been monumental, it has been a correspondingly monumental era in the nation’s development, whether it is the many thousands of households who now have electricity and clean water for the first time, the dramatic improvement in the nation’s roads, the completion of projects such as the Grand Pacific Hotel or the clock tower atop Government Buildings chiming in the hours again for the first time in a generation.

Fiji is patently not the same country in the same arrested state of development that it was when Bainimarama herded the old political order aside at gunpoint in 2006. And while that intervention may have earned him pariah status among Fiji’s bigger neighbours – who fulminated about Bainimarama perpetuating a coup culture – they missed a wider truth. That far from being regarded as a tyrant by the majority of his own people, they came to regard him as a hero, someone who identified with them, empathised with their needs and had their best interests at heart. Nothing exemplifies this more than the Government’s free schooling policy, truly the game changer that has transformed many lives for the better and set Fiji on a path towards being a smarter country.

I was in a taxi on Friday with a driver who said he wished he’d been born in the new Fiji because his widowed mother had been too poor to pay for his school fees. He’d been dragged in front of the class in primary school and humiliated as the principal demanded payment before eventually throwing him out of the school. Heartbreaking stories like this are legion in Fiji. Bainimarama put an end to the suffering of countless parents and students alike this year with his free schooling initiative. So it is only a mystery to outsiders – and the PM’s band of unyielding domestic opponents – that while he may have begun his journey as a coup maker, he ends it having morphed triumphantly into a democrat with the biggest popular vote ever secured by a politician in Fiji.

THUMBS UP FOR THE BAINIMARAMA AGENDA

How it must gall these opponents that the “illegal dictator” is about to become the legally elected Prime Minister, that the “Pariah” is now an important player on both the regional and international stages and that the Fijian people – in an election dubbed credible by the Multinational Observer Group – have put their trust in him to take the nation forward. Not only has Bainimarama emerged triumphant at the polls, his program has now been overwhelmingly endorsed in what has unquestionably been a referendum on every aspect of his program. Every citizen is now a Fijian by popular acclamation. Every Fijian enjoys equal status and equal opportunity by popular acclamation. The Secular State is endorsed by popular acclamation. The Qoliqoli Bill is rejected by popular acclamation.

The point is that Voreqe Bainimarama now has a democratic mandate for the 2013 Constitution, which his opponents say was foisted on the nation, but that the nation has now embraced. And he has a decisive mandate to implement the Manifesto he took to the election. It is inarguable. It is unambiguous. And it is a momentous achievement, an unparalleled triumph of leadership in the Fijian context.

Far from pandering to their prejudices and fears, Bainimarama has convinced the Fijian people – and especially the i’Taukei – to turn their backs on division and embrace a united and inclusive future. He has created Year Zero in the country’s tumultuous history to finally begin the task of nation building that should have begun at Independence in 1970 but was derailed by sectional interests, the elite and a culture of self entitlement and outright selfishness. Instead of working together as one nation, Fijians have spent much of the last 44 years in the thrall of those around them who preach division and hatred. But now – thanks largely to Bainimarama – they have been jolted into the realisation that they have been perpetually manipulated, not for their own benefit, but to suit the base ambitions of others.

In the election coverage on television, I was struck by the number of people – notably i’Taukei – who said they voted for Bainimarama not so much for his service delivery – impressive as that may be – but because he was “the best person to take the nation forward”. This is a hugely positive phenomenon. Because it suggests that ordinary people have rejected the politics of division. They are sick of living in the past. They are tired of the old arguments. They want to embrace a united future in which every Fijian has a stake. And they regard Voreqe Bainimarama as the best person to deliver that future. To offer a vision of progress and hope.

A SUCCESSFUL DOUBLE ACT.

I recall a conversation I once had with the Attorney General, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, in which he opined that the PM’s moral clarity and force of will had provided Fiji with a unique and perhaps unrepeatable opportunity. ” No other leader has ever had the vision to tackle the divisions between us or the courage to take on the forces holding us back”, he said. The AG’s unwavering loyalty to the PM is based on this fundamental premise and this loyalty has been returned in equal measure. When certain figures came to the PM complaining about the AG and seeking his removal, Bainimarama sent them packing with the savage admonition to come back to him when they did a fraction of the work the AG was doing for the betterment of the country. The term workaholic could have been invented for him.

It has been a unique partnership that now goes into the new Parliament. One of the great shibboleths in Fiji is that the AG is unpopular, even hated, and would lead the PM to defeat unless he cut him loose. The raw figures have proved this wrong. How did it happen? The electorate has undoubtedly recognised his hard work to reform the country. But it’s also a little known fact that the AG gives his personal mobile number to many ordinary people, answers their calls when they ring him and tries to help them navigate a way through the tangled web of Government to solve their problems. He emerges from this election as a political figure of consequence in his own right, having garnered more votes for FijiFirst than any other candidate after Bainimarama and being beaten only by Ro Teimumu Kepa in the overall tally. He is the third most important politician in Fiji in terms of his ability to secure votes and has the political mana to be Deputy Prime Minister, if indeed, that is what is decided.

The duo at the top is supplemented with a range of capable individuals, some of whom were proven performers in the last Government, such as Ratu Inoke Kubuabola, Inia Seruiratu, Dr Neil Sharma and Dr Jiko Luveni,. They’re joined by new additions in the Parliament such as Dr Mahendra Reddy and Pio Tikoduadua, who have been star performers as vote getters in this election. Both these figures are widely respected, Dr Reddy as Head of the Commerce Commission and Tikoduadua as former Permanent Secretary in the PM’s Office, a man with a reputation as a “Mr Fixit” who carried the election fight to Ro Teimumu’s doorstep in Rewa and Tailevu and did her significant electoral damage. These, along with many others, will form the nucleus of a fresh administration that Bainimarama says will redouble its efforts to improve the circumstances of Fijians across the nation.

THE CHURCH OF DIVISION

With his comfortable majority, the PM enjoys both a mandate to implement his program and a cushion in the Parliament to keep him secure on the floor of the House. One of his biggest fears – aside, of course, from defeat – was either the slimmest of winning margins that would shackle his reform program or a coalition that he always ruled out but might have embraced if it meant keeping SODELPA at bay. Yet a solid margin in the Parliament is no insurance against continuing problems in the wider community. And there are ominous signs that while the majority may have embraced him at the ballot box, some of Bainimarama’s opponents – political and religious – remain a brooding, malignant presence. Among these, regrettably, are Bainimarama’s old detractors in the Methodist Church, the biggest religious organisation in Fiji and still a bastion of indigenous supremacy, whatever its protestations to the contrary.

The Methodist Church claims that it has turned its back on partisan politics and has conducted a very public campaign to “heal” what it says are the divisions of the past. Yet last week it made the extraordinary decision to boycott the National Day of Thanksgiving for the release of the 45 Fijian Peacekeepers in Syria. In doing so, the Church has ripped the scab off its slowly healing relationship with the Government and restored its pariah status in the eyes of the Prime Minister, who has now been elected democratically by a huge margin and commands unprecedented authority in the country.

The Methodists were to play a major role in the Service of Thanksgiving at the ANZ National Stadium on election eve. But that morning came the news that its leadership would not be taking part because it regarded the event as “political”. This was a State Event at which the President gave the main address, the Prime Minister had no role and to which the leaders of all political parties were formally invited. It was to give thanks to God for protecting our men and sustaining their families during a terrible personal ordeal. Yet the biggest Christian denomination in Fiji chose to boycott the event. The news didn’t get out and has yet to be reported. Why? Partly because nobody seems to have noticed on the day due to the impressive turnout. And partly because after the scale of Wednesday’s election win, the Methodists are hardly anxious for their partisanship and insensitivity to be exposed.

In the event, the Service proceeded without the Methodist leadership, without the Centenary Church Choir but with many Methodists present who were totally unaware of the boycott. The media didn’t notice and neither, it seems, did the aspiring politicians present – Biman Prasad, Mahendra Chaudhry, Roshika Deo and several others. But guess who else wasn’t there? Yes, SODELPA leader Ro Teimumu Kepa, who sent someone else in her place but whose absence confirms what many suspect – that the Methodist Church is SODELPA at prayer. A church so totally politicised that it was willing to turn its back on a service organised by the State, the Nation – not a political party – to give thanks to God for the release of 45 Fijian hostages held by a terrorist group that routinely beheads its victims. To give thanks for the comfort he gave their families and the whole nation.

There has been no public explanation of the boycott and no comment from the Methodist Church leadership. But it is time for all Fijians – and especially Methodists – to demand that the Church hierarchy explain itself. To explain why it turned its back on the hostages and their families. To explain its gross insult to the Nation. The fury in official ranks is palpable. Because it was not the service that was “political” but the actions of the Methodist Church leadership. Why did they really do it? Was it because it was an interfaith service and the Methodist hierarchy was not prepared to share a stage with Hindus or Muslims? Was it because of the failure of the Church’s campaign for the imposition of a Christian State? Was it because the Methodists became convinced that their own star candidate, Ro Teimumu Kepa, would win the election and there would be no consequences? Answers please.

It is deeply troubling that the hierarchy of the largest Church in Fiji is so out of kilter with the public mood that it would engage in such a blatantly partisan stance. Many Methodists will have voted for Bainimarama. And like other Fijians, they have voted overwhelmingly for religious tolerance, not bigotry. They have voted overwhelmingly for equality, not racially-weighted advantages for some. They have voted overwhelmingly for a just and fair society and everyone joining hands to work together to build a better Fiji. They have turned their backs on the division embodied by SODELPA and its acolytes in the Methodist Church and embraced a better future.

It is a wonderful moment in the life of the nation and a historical watershed – the birth of our first real democracy. Voreqe Bainimarama enters the history books as the man, who through sheer force of will, reset the national compass and led Fiji to a more united future. As the PM says: “There has never been a better time to be Fijian”. And most citizens – no matter what their backgrounds and beliefs – will say a collective Amen to that.

Well done sir. They tried everything from trying to kill you in that mutiny and the failed assanisation plot. They knew that you were well protected and they took it to the social media thinking people will read and believe all the lies. It backfired and the rest is history.

Congratulations Fiji, what a great outcome, and thank you God Almighty, whose hand of favour reached to the Islands of Fiji in the early 1800’s. I have followed events from Australia, visiting Fiji once or twice a year, since 1999. I started a letter-writing campaign to Australian politicians to change the view held by political and government leaders – to no avail. I had the opportunity to speak ever so briefly with VB at a breakfast in Lautoka a few years ago. There was no hiding the contempt for Australia – understandable! I’m reading a great book at the moment, When Character Was King, a story of Ronald Reagan who in a CNN/USA/Gallup poll in 2001 was considered to have been the greatest American president ever. My prayer: that VB will follow in the same footsteps, except of course for Fiji. Go Fiji! And thank you Graham for your postings over the years. I appreciated them, as I do those by Crosbie Walsh who I believe brought a balanced view to all that has been reported over the years since VB’s fortuitous intervention. God bless Fiji!

Graham, say what?? ‘The truth is that no credible evidence has ever been advanced that the executive branch of the Fijian Government influences the judiciary, nor that the judiciary does the Government’s bidding’.

I could give you chapter and verse about the strange case of Imrana Jalal, her husband and their upmarket fish and chip shop that somehow merited the attention of FICAC, who shoe-horned 7 Suva City Council misdemeanour allegations (maximum fine: $20 plus $4 a day) into charges under the Bribery Promulgation Act 2007, which the FICAC prosecutor who handled the case later admitted was part of a deliberate government conspiracy.

Or the fates of magistrates Elsie Hudson, Mary Muir and Eparama Rokoika, (chief magistrate) Ajmal Khan and Maika Nakora who all have one fact in common: they found that questioning the credibility or appropriateness of certain prosecutions was a career-ending moment.

But instead I will point you in the direction of the petition of William Marshall QC SC (the same legal status as the government’s heavyweight counsel of choice, Clive Grossman). To the best of my knowledge, his very detailed allegations are yet to be properly examined let alone rebutted. (Except for the government’s favoured misdirection on these occasions, the rather shrill and self-serving insistence this can all be explained away, these allegations, those of FICAC’s Madhwa Tenakoon and others, as the spiteful actions of embittered ex-employees).

Oh, I forgot. Croz also added into his smear a suggestion that Marshall liked gin and was perhaps suffering post-Colonial blues. Or something like that.

Then lay out the evidence, Charlie. Provide a specific instance with proper documentation or a sworn statement that proves conclusively the NZ contention that “the Government has a degree of influence over the judiciary”. These are allegations, not proof. And in the case of Marshall, allegations from someone with an axe to grind.

I am including a link to the website that Justice Marshall maintains. On this you can navigate to his affidavit (aka evidence) to the allegations made. As you will know when someone swears an affidavit they are swearing that their testimony is true and accurate. I am not saying that lawyers never bear false witness but an internet search fails to reveal any QC SC who has been shown to have sworn an untrue affidavit.

I am sure you are ready to say these are only allegations, and not evidence. The affidavit of any acccuser or plaintiff would be admissable in court as evidence. It could be tested by anybody commissioned to investigate (Shaista Shameem is listed as Marshall’s ‘representative’). No such investigation has been ordered but the affidavit remains. Looking at Croz’s blog on the subject, he references the AG in the first paragraph as saying that Marshall was not renewed because of his corruption (not alleged, but proven).

Again no information as to what corrupt act or acts Mashall committed, when, why, who benefitted or how.

Presumably – by the law of gooses and ganders – if the AG can pass a verdict of corruption on the Resident Justice of Appeal without any obvious allegation let alone evidence, by that same standard Marshall’s affidavit demands a thorough investigation if only to silence the critics in NZ.

Charlie, these are allegations are from someone who was aggrieved that his contract in Fiji wasn’t renewed and who had not raised any of his concerns prior to being terminated. Whatever his exalted status, there exists motive and in the absence of documentary evidence or another judge alleging the same thing, his allegations cannot be construed as fact or proven. If the Marshall case is what the NZ Government is relying on to make it’s bald assertion, it could have at least said “it has been alleged by a former judge in Fiji that the Government has a degree of influence over the judiciary”. Instead it is portrayed as absolute fact.

Given your own family background, the comments on SODELPA and Methodist Church hierarchy requires my response, as an ex-Nadi born(1938) native son who was forced to emigrate (1974).

Of all the ills you’ve identified with existing BLV and itaukei history, religion and individual identity appears to me of highest priority – if native culture can ultimately be modernized in this 21st century – under 2013 constitution. Because if you’ve lived close to a Koro, as I did, in Nacavu/Saunaka, you know how tolerant the commoner is in his dealing with Indo-Fijians. My Granny fed them from the same plate. And the elders loved it because (like Frank) she was building our family Tree in Fiji.

I’ve separately sent you my comments on Ratu Joni’s defense of BLV and Itaukei and consider it a blessing, at my advanced age, to witness the birth of real freedom and democracy in Fiji.

Mary, which bits are wrong? I guess you think the Fijian people got it wrong too. It was a landslide in favour of Bainimarama and a crushing, humiliating defeat for his opponents. So it is people like you who are having to eat your words, not me.

Good to see you back & for Frank job well done. The race based elections is over & out we can count ourselves a far better democracy than some around the word. Australia & NZ will continue to thwart Franks Govt in anyway they can-but Frank isn’t going to be fooled by the Grants, Aids and whatever trinkets will come Fijis way. Behind all of that will be a dagger dipped in poisonous puffer fish “blood”. Problem is those fallows from Kiuva love to eat the puffer fish! The truth is Frank won & for those that were thinking Frank was in for a “hiding” you must surely have a painful arse right now. Trying to comprehend how this guy outwitted you’s all -“isa sa mosi saraga na cici”. The best is yet to come- this is Chapter 1 of 101.Good job Graham!

Thanks for excellent article. Bainimarama managed to reset the national compass. Never before in my family did anyone ever discussed whom to vote for. We always voted for the same party – have always voted for this party since its inception.

This time all of us discussed and debated and voted our own ways. Only my mum voted for the same party while the rest of us voted fiji first. For the first time in my life I actually voted for somebody other than that of my own race. And I feel good about it.

We have great expectations will will continue to support fiji first as we try and build a new fiji.

I think your enthusiasm for the regime has you blinded to the significance of these allegations and the credibility of the accuser (but see also Madhwa Tennekoon, for corroboration). If these charges had been made by the equivalent judicial figure with the equivalent standing in the federal system in Australia about the attorney general, the registrar general, the solicitor general and ICAC (as an alleged tool of a malevolent executive branch) or any combination of the above, you and the late Frykers would have been all over it. And you know it!

As you swat away his petition, you also offer no evidence that Marshall was aggrieved or embittered (in fact, in his petition, he says he was offered a six-month extension while the Chief Justice worked behind the scenes to try to roll over his contract, and rejected this.)

There is also no evidence presented (as reported by Croz) of Marshall’s corruption which the then-AG said was the reason for his non-renewal. Nor any evidence that the fact of this ‘corruption’ was reported to FICAC (as the then AG was duty bound to do) or any professional body.

Plus, the idea that Marshall never raised his concerns while employed is laughable. From midway through Marshall’s term, his direct report, the Chief Justice, would have needed to be in a permanent coma to have not known what was being done as dark forces close to the former Attorney-General tried to frame his Resident Justice of Appeal and impugn his reputation.

The saga of the ‘Holiday Inn Handshake’ started in May 2011 but took more than five months to play itself out, both in court and the media. Finally in a September 11 2011 judgement on a FICAC petition that Marshall be recused from hearing the Patel/Mau appeal three judges found that the-then Attorney-General’s own bodyguard ‘has stated a falsehood … the statement appears to be factually incorrect.’

Kolinio Waqa had sworn an affidavit that he had seen Marshall ‘glad hand’ a family member or friend of Mr Mahendra Patel and talk with Mrs Patel while at the Holiday Inn. [Waqa’s initial statement had said that both Patel and Mau were also present but that was shown to be not possible as they were already in jail]. In the face of this smear, which one could fairly presume may have been directed by a higher force, Marshall, his wife and Mrs Patel all swore affidavits that they had never met.

In the final court ruling not only was Waqa found to be not telling the truth but three judges found that the bodyguard made his sworn statement despite the clear evidentiary issue that he ‘has not seen Justice Marshall before’.

Waqa was saved the embarrassment of explaining himself in court. But this boils down to the bodyguard of the-then attorney-general bearing sworn, false witness against one of the most senior judges in the country, alleging bias and favouritism, and in order to confound said judge’s appearance in perhaps the most high-profile corruption case arising from the 2006 [the convictions for which Marshall would subsequently uphold on appeal].

And you seriously think the Chief Justice needed a memo or workplace feedback from Marshall to alert him to what was going on, and how the independence of the CJ’s judges and the credibility of the judiciary was being undermined by someone in the employ of the-then attorney-general?

After the glories of election day, this might seem like a small point from a distant part of Fiji’s history but it is part of an alarming pattern that continues to this day.

Whatever is the truth behind the hospitalisation of Joseva Bilitaki we already know that the Commissioner of Police was infuriated by the use of the military acting outside the law, arresting someone on an allegation that only rises to ‘annoyance’ and using police facilities for the ‘interrogation’.

Does the military’s continued extra-judicial actions (whatever the explanation and hospital issues arising) in your new democracy really represent ‘the impatient, sometimes fiery authoritarian figure giving way to a softer, more genial presence’ as you so movingly opined?

BTW, Charlie. Re the “annoyance” arrest: My understanding is that certain members of the Police acted on a complaint from a relatively junior officer in the military without referring it upwards. Hence the Police Commissioner’s discombobulation. You don’t have an argument with me about the absurdity of the charge. As I have pointed out elsewhere, I have been guilty of being an annoyance since birth. In short, it was a cock-up, not a conspiracy.

Charlie recently the Aussie Magistrate in Nauru was booted out not a word form the Government of the day? Why- off shore processing.
How many Aboriginal Death in Custody cases have seen the light of day in court??? How many convictions? Need i carry on?
Fiji will find its own way to the path of democracy just as England did thru murder and slaughter, do need to go down the same path- not really but no ones going to tell Fijians when and how they will governed – if we have erred so be it. Lest you forget our fore-fathers have just stopped eating one another about 5 generations ago- so stop your bullshit comparisons.

Charlie, bless you for the elaborate plot but this reads more like the first draft of your latest thriller than a definitive factual account. I just don’t buy the story line, which you sell with such utter conviction but which simply doesn’t ring true on the basis of the available evidence. I have heard the other side of this saga, which is of an embittered man in whom the principal players had simply given up hope because he was a square peg in a round hole. He went on to wage a personal vendetta, which is his right, but which doesn’t give him a monopoly on the historical record. If he really wants his own narrative to be the dominant one – or to assert his rights in law – the usual options are open to him. I suspect that everyone except him has moved on.

You know as well as I do that the Fijian system has been compromised by a weak and ineffective judiciary that has it’s origins in the resignation of the high court judges back in 1987 and further compromised by the actions of Fatiaki, Tuivaga & Scott back in 2000. In between and subsequent we had 2 or was it 3 new constitutions that further embedded racism and therefore disenfranchisement.

The only people who kept the judicial function hanging by the barest thread were Gates, Byrnes, Mishra for a while and Rooney. That they had to deal with such insititutional weaknesses and almost systemic failure is incredible. One day somebody will write a proper account of the valiant attempts in keeping justice associated with the judicial process because in similiar situations in other places such as west africa it been the beginning of the end for progress as we know it.

It’s my sincere hope that we now have a better system in place and that will hopefully lead to an improvement in the availability of intellectual capital for the judicial system.

At the tail end of this road is the story of a rather sad and sorry individual brought before the magistrate on a charge of drunken and disorderly conduct after a big night out at the golden dragon.

After the charge was read out in court the accused was asked to respond with a guilty or not guilty verdict. Still feeling the effects of the previous nights exuberance the accused responded “Man, I don’t know.”

FOLLOW GRUBSHEET ON FACEBOOK

REGISTER FOR EMAIL UPDATES

ABOUT GRUBSHEET

Grubsheet Feejee is the blogsite of Graham Davis, a dual Fijian-Australian national working as a media and communications specialist in both countries and in other parts of the Asia Pacific.

Graham has had a four decade-long career in the mainstream media in Britain, Australia and Fiji. He has reported for the BBC, ABC, SBS and the Nine and Seven Networks and has written for a range of newspapers and magazines in Australia, New Zealand and Fiji. His multiple awards include Walkley and Logie Awards in Australia and a New York Festivals Medal in the United States.

More recently, Graham has been a consultant to the GeoPolitical Solutions division of the global communications company, Qorvis-MSLGROUP, which represents a range of sovereign clients around the world. Part of his brief is to assist the Fijian Government with its program to introduce the first genuine democracy in the nation’s history in 2014.

Graham is broadly supportive of the Bainimarama Government's reform agenda but invites comments from people of all political persuasions. Please don't label your return volley "anonymous". Give yourself a name or pseudonym so that readers can track your progress over time.

Many of these postings have appeared in mainstream newspapers such as The Australian and the Fiji Sun – where Graham has been a columnist - and on other websites, including newmatilda.com and Pacific Scoop NZ.

Feejee is the original name for Fiji - a derivative of the indigenous Viti and the Tongan Fisi - and was widely used until the late 19th century.