~~YV ~Q----b
g;:Y'd~ f~ /~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT COMMITMENTS .................................................................................................... i
I. TYPE OF ACTION ......................................................................................................... 1
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION .................................................................... 1
III. SELECTED ALTERNATIVE ......................................................................................... 1
IV. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ......................................................... 3
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION.......................................................................... 4
A. Distribution of the Environmental Assessment ................................................ 4
B. Comments on the Environmental Assessment .................................................. 4
C. Public Hearing ................................................................................................... 6
D. Agency Coordination ........................................................................................ 7
E. Local Coordination ............................................................................................ 7
VI. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ....................................... 8
A. Structures .......................................................................................................... 8
B. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities/Greenways/Public Facilities ........................ 8
C. Landscaping ...................................................................................................... 9
D. Avoidance, Minimization and Mitigation ......................................................... 9
E. Section 4(f)/6(f) Resources ............................................................................. 10
F. Relocation of Residences and Businesses ....................................................... 11
G. Minority/Low-Income Populations ................................................................. 11
H. Corrections to the Environmental Assessment ............................................... 11
I. Update to the Environmental Assessment ...................................................... 12
VII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT .................................... 13
MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure 1 Project Location Map
Figure 2 Proposed Improvements
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 – Project Cost Estimate.............................................................................................. 2
Table 2 – Summary of Environmental Effects……................................................................ 3
Table 3 – Correction to Table 12 of the EA Homes and Businesses to be Relocated…........ 11
APPENDICES
Appendix A – Agency Comments on the Environmental Assessment
Appendix B – Updated Relocation Report for Project
1
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
PREPARED BY THE
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IN CONSULTATION WITH THE
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
I. TYPE OF ACTION
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI).
The FHWA has determined this project will have no significant impact on the
human environment. This Finding of No Significant Impact is based upon comments
received on the November 22, 2011 Environmental Assessment (EA) and subsequent
public involvement, which has been independently evaluated by the FHWA and
determined to adequately and accurately discuss the need, environmental issues and
impacts of the proposed project and appropriate mitigation measures. The following
documentation provides sufficient evidence and analysis for determining that an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required. The FHWA takes full
responsibility for the accuracy, scope and content of the Environmental Assessment.
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
The proposed project involves the replacement of Bridge Number 116, which
carries NC 24-210 (Rowan Street) over the CSX Railroad, Norfolk Southern Railroad
and Hillsboro Street in downtown Fayetteville. The project also involves reconfiguring
the Rowan Street intersections with Bragg Boulevard and Murchison Road into a single
signalized intersection.
The proposed project is included in the approved 2012-2018 North Carolina State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The project is scheduled for right of way
acquisition and construction in federal fiscal years 2014 and 2016, respectively in the
draft 2014-2020 STIP.
III. SELECTED ALTERNATIVE
Several alternatives were considered for this project, including the no-build
alternative, a roundabout alternative and a signalized intersection alternative. In addition,
replacing only the bridge in place without making intersection improvements was also
considered (See Section III of the EA). One build alternative was selected for detailed
study in the Environmental Assessment and is the selected alternative for this project.
2
The build alternative consists of a six-lane typical section (three through lanes in
each direction separated by a median) and is proposed along NC 24-210 (Rowan Street)
from NC 24 (Bragg Boulevard) to Ray Avenue. Two twelve-foot lanes and an outside
fourteen-foot lane with curb and gutter will be provided. Existing five-foot sidewalks on
both sides of Rowan Street will be replaced. It is anticipated approximately 100 to 120
feet of right of way will be required. No control of access is proposed.
The latest cost estimate for the project is presented below.
Table 1. Project Cost Estimate
Right of Way Acquisition
(Including Utility Relocation)
$11,548,850
Construction $23,400,000
Total $34,948,850
The cost estimate for the project included in the draft 2014-2020 STIP is $36,385,000.
Of this total, $12,985,000 is estimated for right of way acquisition and utility relocation
and $23,400,000 is estimated for construction.
3
IV. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
Table 3 presents a summary of the anticipated environmental effects for the
project.
Table 2. Summary of Environmental Impacts
Project Length (miles) 0.6
Relocations Residential 0
Business 15
Total Relocations 15
Minority/Low Income Populations -
Disproportionate Impacts*
No
Historic Properties (adverse effect) No
Community Facilities Impacted** None
Section 4(f) Impacts No
Noise Impacts (impacted properties) 10
Wetlands (acres) 0
Streams (linear feet) 781
Floodplain (acres) 11.78
Forested Area (acres) 1.93
Federally Protected Species No effect
Cost Right of Way Cost $10,690,000
Utilities Cost $858,850
Construction Cost $23,400,000
Total Cost $34,948,850
* Impacts defined as disproportionate adverse impacts to
minority or low income populations.
**Impacts to schools, parks, churches, fire stations, cemeteries, etc.
4
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
A. Distribution of the Environmental Assessment
Copies of the environmental assessment were made available to the public and to
the following federal, state and local agencies:
*US Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
*US Environmental Protection Agency
US Fish and Wildlife Service – Raleigh
*NC Department of Administration – State Clearinghouse
NC Department of Cultural Resources – State Historic Preservation Office
*NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources – DENR
*DENR – NC Division of Water Quality
DENR – NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Cumberland County
City of Fayetteville
Asterisks (*) indicate agencies from which comments on the environmental
assessment were received. Copies of letters received are included in Appendix A of this
document.
B. Comments on the Environmental Assessment
Substantive comments on the environmental assessment are presented below.
US Army Corps of Engineers
COMMENT: “Please describe why the proposed intersection cannot be shifted
approximately 200-400 feet east of the proposed location. Shifting the
proposed roadways and intersection to the east would result in two
separate crossings over Cross Creek and would likely reduce the amount
of stream channel impacts, flood plain impacts and business relocations.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: As discussed in Section V-D of this document, shifting the
proposed intersection eastward to allow the construction of two shorter
culverts for Cross Creek would potentially affect the State Veterans Park
and would require a change in the grade of the realigned section of
Rowan Street between the proposed railroad grade separation and Cross
Creek. This would be within the 100-year floodplain and regulated
floodway, likely increasing the 100-year flood elevation and potentially
requiring the acquisition of additional properties. A field meeting was
held on August 15, 2012 between NCDOT, the Corps of Engineers and
the NC Division of Water Quality to review the proposed project and
discuss comments made on the environmental assessment regarding
5
shifting the alignment of the proposed intersection and bridging Cross
Creek. This meeting resolved agency concerns.
COMMENT: “The EA should describe a bridging scenario for crossing Cross Creek.
Constructing a bridge(s) would eliminate the need to fill approximately
800 feet of continuous stream channel and would avoid and/or minimize
impact to the Cross Creek and its associated floodplain.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Construction of a bridge over Cross Creek instead of the
proposed culvert would likely increase the 100-year flood elevation in the
Cross Creek floodplain, potentially requiring the acquisition of additional
properties further upstream (see Section V-D of this document).
COMMENT: “It appears that the project could potentially have disproportionately high
and adverse effects on minority and low income populations.
Environmental Justice issues should be adequately addressed with
Executive Order 12989 and mitigation measures should be described in
the FONSI or final NEPA document.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Additional coordination with minority business owners affected
by the project has been conducted; see Section V-G of this document.
This project has been implemented in accordance with Executive Order
12989.
US Environmental Protection Agency
COMMENT: “Cross Creek are class C; 303(d) waters of the State. Cross Creek is on
the 303(d) list for impaired use for aquatic life due to habitat degradation.
A recent description from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ) varies slightly from the EA information on Cross Creek
provided on page 18 [of the EA].”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Comment noted. NCDOT notes the NC DWQ description of
Cross Creek as class C; 303(d) waters of the State based on the 2012
Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list. See Section V-H.
COMMENT: “Table 7 of the EA does not describe Stream ‘SA’ which is also expected
to be impacted for 61 linear feet.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Table 7 of the EA merely presents impacts to streams. Stream
SA is an unnamed tributary to Cross Creek.
COMMENT: “The EA on page 19 does not describe any avoidance and minimization
measures to jurisdictional streams. EPA has environmental concerns that
the EA did not identify any avoidance and minimization measures to an
impaired stream.”
6
“…EPA requests that the transportation agencies identify relevant
avoidance and minimization measures to Cross Creek prior to the
issuance of the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and
incorporate these measures into preliminary hydraulic plans. EPA
requests that impacts to floodplain and riparian buffers to Cross Creek be
minimized to the greatest extent practicable.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: See Section V-D of this document.
NC Division of Water Quality
COMMENT: “Although this project is not being proposed to be placed in the
404/NEPA Merger Process. Given the potentially substantial impacts to
Cross Creek associated with the project, NCDWQ would like the
opportunity to review and comments on the project’s preliminary plans
typically provided at the 4B and 4C stage of the Merger Process.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Comment noted.
COMMENT: “Cross Creek are class C; 303(d) waters of the State. Cross Creek is on
the 303(d) list for impaired use for aquatic life due to habitat degradation.
DWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could
result from this project. DWQ recommends that the most protective
sediment and erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce the risk of
nutrient runoff to Cross Creek. DWQ requests that road design plans
provide treatment of the storm water runoff through best management
practices as detailed in the most recent version of NC DWQ Stormwater
Best Management Practices.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: As discussed in the environmental assessment, NCDOT’s Best
Management Practices for the protection of surface waters will be strictly
enforced to reduce impacts to Cross Creek during all construction phases.
COMMENT: “DWQ requests that all jurisdictional features identified within the study
area in Figure 5 (Environmental Features in Project Area) of this
document also be shown in Figure 2 (Current Study Alternative) to assist
in identifying minimization and avoidance within study alternative.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Figure 2 of this document depicts the jurisdictional features, as
requested.
C. Public Hearing
In accordance with 23 U.S.C. 128, the North Carolina Department of
Transportation certifies that a public hearing for the subject project has been held and the
social, economic, and environmental impacts, consistency with local community planning
goals and objectives, and comments from individuals have been considered in the
selection of the recommended alternative for the project.
7
A formal public hearing was held for the project on August 20, 2012 at the
Airborne and Special Operations Museum in downtown Fayetteville. A local officials
meeting was also held on August 6, 2012.
Approximately 61 citizens attended the hearing. Eight written comments were
received during the hearing comment period. Three comments focused on providing for
left turn movements onto and from SR 3147 (West Rowan Street) at Bragg Boulevard.
One comment was made at the hearing regarding safety of pedestrians using sidewalks
along the proposed project.
D. Agency Coordination
A field meeting was held on August 15, 2012 with NCDOT personnel, the Corps
of Engineers and the NC Division of Water Quality to review the proposed project and
discuss comments made on the environmental assessment regarding a bridging alternative
of Cross Creek and the possibility of shifting the alignment of the proposed relocated
intersection.
It was discussed that much of the proposed project lies within the 100-year
floodplain and regulated floodway for Cross Creek. Replacement of the existing culvert
with a bridge over Cross Creek would likely increase the 100-year flood water surface
elevation upstream and potentially require the acquisition of additional properties further
upstream.
It was also discussed that shifting the alignment of the proposed intersection to
the east to possibly create two separate crossings over Cross Creek and minimize impacts
would not be practical as it would require a change in the grade of the realigned section
of Rowan Street between the proposed railroad grade separation and Cross Creek. This
would be within the 100-year floodplain and regulated floodway, likely increasing the
100-year flood elevation and potentially requiring the acquisition of additional properties.
Due to the urban nature of the project area and discussions from this field
meeting, the project is not being considered for placement in the NEPA/404 Merger
Process at this time.
E. Local Coordination
Following completion of the environmental assessment, NCDOT reviewed and
responded to items the City requested be included as part of the project in their October
14, 2011 letter (see Appendix A of the environmental assessment).
It has been determined the following items can be included as part of the proposed
project through the execution of a municipal agreement. The City will be required to
fund the additional cost for the special requests listed below:
8
Brick colored stamped concrete where raised median is less than six feet wide.
Black powder-coated traffic signal poles at the proposed realigned intersection
of Bragg Boulevard, Murchison Road and Rowan Street.
Black powder-coated traffic signal poles and mast arms at the intersection of
Ray Avenue and Rowan Street.
Conduit for irrigation pipes.
Items that have been agreed to and will be included at no cost to the City of
Fayetteville are:
Grass medians where median width is greater than six feet, with the exception
of the median along Rowan Street between the proposed Murchison
Road/Bragg Boulevard/Rowan Street intersection and Ray Avenue, which
will be brick colored stamped concrete.
Electrical conduit on both sides of proposed bridges for future lighting
(lighting to be installed and maintained through encroachment by the City).
High visibility pavement markings at the intersections.
Eight-foot pedestrian refuge islands at the proposed intersection.
In addition, the City also requested an accelerated utility relocation schedule. As
the final plans are developed, NCDOT will coordinate with the City and Fayetteville’s
Public Works Commission (PWC) to enhance the utility relocation schedule and possibly
accelerate utility relocation funding.
VI. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
A. Structures
NCDOT, FAMPO and the City of Fayetteville had discussed constructing a
pedestrian culvert to carry the Little Cross Creek Trail under relocated Rowan Street as
part of this project (see Sections IV-I, IV-J and V-D-4 of the environmental assessment).
The culvert would have been funded by FAMPO. However, following completion of the
environmental assessment, FAMPO withdrew their request for a pedestrian culvert. No
pedestrian culvert is proposed for the project.
As discussed in Section IV-E of this document, electrical conduit will be provided
on both sides of proposed bridges for future lighting (lighting to be installed and
maintained through encroachment by the City).
B. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities/Greenways/Public Facilities
The Little Cross Creek Trail is a proposed multi-use trail that is expected to
connect existing greenway trails between Cross Creek in the project study area. The trail
is being developed by the Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
(FAMPO).
9
A portion of the proposed Little Cross Creek Trail will be constructed as a part of
this project, if FAMPO will agree in writing to participate in the cost and to accept
maintenance and liability for the trail. A ten-foot wide multi-use path will be constructed
on the west side of Murchison Road between the proposed Murchison Road/Rowan
Street/Bragg Boulevard intersection and the northern limits of the project. The trail will
cross Rowan Street at-grade utilizing the pedestrian crosswalk. Additional right of way
required for the trail and any additional cost of the path above the cost of a five-foot
sidewalk will be funded by FAMPO. A municipal agreement will be prepared regarding
the trail prior to construction.
As discussed in Section V-A of this document, a pedestrian culvert under
relocated Rowan Street is no longer proposed by FAMPO for the Little Cross Creek
Trail.
As discussed in Section IV-E of this document, eight-foot pedestrian refuge
islands will be provided at the proposed Murchison Road/Bragg Boulevard/Rowan Street
intersection.
C. Landscaping
At the request of the City of Fayetteville (see Section IV-E), proposed medians
and islands wider than six feet will be landscaped, with the exception of the median along
Rowan Street between the proposed Murchison Road/Rowan Street/Bragg Boulevard
intersection and Ray Avenue. The median on Rowan Street between the proposed
intersection and Ray Avenue will be brick colored stamped concrete. Appropriate
landscaping will also be provided at the proposed Murchison Road/Bragg
Boulevard/Rowan Street intersection. Following project construction, NCDOT can
provide landscaping appropriate for the design speed and median width on the project.
NCDOT can fund landscaping in an amount up to 0.5 percent of the project construction
cost. The City would be responsible for maintaining any landscaping. If the City prefers,
it may submit its own landscaping plan for review, provided the City agrees to fund and
maintain it. For islands less than six feet in width, stamped concrete can be used if the
City will agree to pay the additional estimated cost.
NCDOT will coordinate with the City to include conduit for irrigation pipes in the
project plans, provided the City will agree to fund and maintain the conduit.
A municipal agreement will be prepared for these items prior to project
construction.
D. Avoidance, Minimization and Mitigation
As presented on Table 2 of this document, the proposed project will affect a total
of 781 feet of jurisdictional streams. At Cross Creek, the project will require the
replacement of two existing approximately 70-foot and 100-foot long culverts with an
approximately 720-foot long culvert. The project will also require piping an additional
61 feet of Stream SA, which is an unnamed tributary to Cross Creek.
10
Due to their location, avoiding these streams is not possible. Existing Rowan
Street crosses both streams. Construction of a bridge over Cross Creek instead of the
proposed culvert would likely increase the 100-year flood elevation in the Cross Creek
floodplain, potentially requiring the acquisition of additional properties further upstream.
Alignment shifts to minimize stream impacts are not possible due to other
constraints, such as the railroads, the State Veterans Park, Festival Park and historic
properties. Shifting the proposed intersection eastward to allow the construction of two
shorter culverts for Cross Creek would potentially affect the State Veterans Park and
would require a change in the grade of the realigned section of Rowan Street between the
proposed railroad grade separation and Cross Creek. This would be within the 100-year
floodplain and regulated floodway and result in additional fill and further constriction of
the floodplain and regulated floodway, likely increasing the 100-year flood elevation and
potentially requiring the acquisition of additional properties.
As discussed in Section V-A-3-c of the environmental assessment, final decisions
regarding wetland and stream mitigation requirements will be made by the US Army
Corps of Engineers and the NC Division of Water Quality. On-site mitigation will be
used as much as possible. The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will be used for
remaining mitigation requirements beyond what can be satisfied by on-site mitigation.
E. Section 4(f)/6(f) Resources
As discussed in Section V-C of the environmental assessment, a temporary
construction easement is proposed within a portion of Festival Park, which is located
south of Rowan Street between the railroad tracks and Ray Avenue (see Figure 2). The
temporary construction easement involves a temporary occupancy of the park, a Section
4(f) resource. The temporary construction easement is needed due to a change in the
roadway grade adjacent to Festival Park. No change in ownership of the land will occur.
The City of Fayetteville’s Parks and Recreation Director has reviewed the project
and is in agreement with the proposed project. In an email dated October 21, 2011 and a
memorandum dated November 17, 2011, the Parks and Recreation Director and the
Interim Director for Engineering and Infrastructure agreed the proposed project will not
adversely affect any activities, features or attributes of Festival Park. A copy of the email
and memorandum were included in Appendix A of the environmental assessment. The
public was afforded an opportunity to review and comment on the project’s effects on
Festival Park at the August 20, 2012 public hearing held for this project (see Section IV-C)
and no comments were received.
FHWA has determined that the proposed temporary easement constitutes a
temporary occupancy of public park property based on the criteria contained in 23 CFR
774.13(d). A Section 4(f) evaluation is not required for obtaining temporary construction
easements for this project.
11
F. Relocation of Residences and Businesses
Since the completion of the environmental assessment, a minor change to the
preliminary design has resulted in two additional business relocations. Originally, it was
anticipated 13 businesses would be relocated. Table 4 below presents the anticipated
number of homes and businesses which would be relocated by the proposed project. A
copy of the revised relocation report can be found in Appendix B.
Table 3. Correction to Table 12 of EA
Homes and Businesses to be Relocated
Homes Businesses
0 15[10]
Numbers in bracket(s) [ ] indicate minority-owned
homes or businesses
G. Minority/Low-Income Populations
The majority of the businesses to be relocated by the project are minority-owned.
A commitment was included in the environmental assessment to hold a special meeting
for the minority-owned businesses expected to be relocated to allow them the opportunity
to review and comment on the project. NCDOT and FAMPO staff visited the businesses
on January 5, 2012 in order to obtain contact information for any businesses that might be
tenants and to inform them of the special meeting. Eight of fifteen business owners were
contacted during the site visit. The other businesses were either closed or the buildings
were vacant. Staff provided general information regarding the project, including
schedule and project impact to businesses. Most business owners were aware of the
project and that they would be impacted.
The special meeting was held on August 20, 2012 at the Airborne and Special
Operations Museum in Fayetteville. Three business owners attended the meeting. A
formal presentation was given and the proposed preliminary design was presented for
review and comment. No objections to the project were expressed at the meeting. No
other outstanding issues were noted.
The public has been kept informed of the proposed project through the public
involvement program, coordination with local officials, and accommodation of local
development plans. This project is being implemented in accordance with Executive
Order 12898.
H. Corrections to the Environmental Assessment
Other Highway Projects in the Area
Section II-B-1-g of the environmental assessment did not include a nearby project
in the list of other highway projects in the area. TIP Project R-5513 involves resurfacing
NC 24-87 (Bragg Boulevard) from Rowan Street to US 401 Bypass. This project is
12
scheduled for right of way acquisition and construction in fiscal years 2013 and 2014,
respectively.
Water Quality Monitoring Data
On Page 18 of the environmental assessment, an error in the classification status
for Cross Creek has been identified. The environmental assessment stated Cross Creek is
listed on the 2010 Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list as impaired waters for aquatic life,
due to the fair bio-classification it received in 2008. This statement is incorrect. Cross
Creek is listed on the 2012 Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list as impaired waters for
aquatic life, due to habitat degradation.
Stream Impacts
An error was discovered in the stream impact calculation for impacts to Cross
Creek in the environmental assessment. Table 7 of the EA presents the impact to Cross
Creek as 800 linear feet. Table 2 and section V-D of this document present the correct
stream impacts of 781 linear feet for the selected alternative presented in the
environmental assessment.
Project Effects on Historic Resources
A typographical error was discovered on Page 26 of the environmental
assessment. The date for concurrence of project effects on historic resources was August
9, 2011, not August 9, 2010.
I. Update to the Environmental Assessment
NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate as of January 24, 2012, Bridge
Number 116 has a sufficiency rating of 4 out of a possible 100. The bridge is considered
structurally deficient and therefore is still eligible for FHWA’s Highway Bridge
Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. On Page iii, 2 and 4 of the environmental
assessment the sufficiency rating was identified as 7 out of a possible 100. This rating
was from a previous inspection report dated May 25, 2010.
13
VII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon environmental studies and coordination with appropriate federal,
state, and local agencies and comments received from the public, it is the finding of the
Federal Highway Administration and the North Carolina Department of Transportation
that the proposed action will have no significant impact upon the quality of the human
environment. This action is based on public involvement and comments received on the
environmental assessment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement will not be
required.
The following persons may be contacted for additional information concerning
this proposal and statement:
John F. Sullivan, III
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Telephone: (919) 856-4346
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Telephone: (919) 707-6000
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
~
I~Y
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
´
Ε Ε
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
APPENDIX A
COMMENTS RECEIVED
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Si~9~t;ly" -~
(~hri~~;:"'er Militsch~
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
~-.
~ 0~'",--·
N~jmCarolina
12~0150
~o.
I)rojl~cl
B~4490
~
~
Wi(t·s~ ~le..
±2.~a=:
~
~
~
Thi~ ~;~
~
W~shington
\Yin~lon-Salcm
-~AYETTE'!:LlE
1an;l~er
appJic,"~::,
\\~
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Proj~INlMllllClJ'" ,~I(, ~,~
I~;t.W 3od1ol'I'JI'IOV'~ to~'Ply
I~ 'C~U1C u.r~_lionand
el~li~el(J ~se p~f\S
tuh~ical
disehar~1:
~IU
AJlPIi~riOQ
~IC'IIIaiU
~
-----..,.~---------- --I-------.....:.-------~-------+-------_
~tIlptdc
V~f",;1
Ajlpl~[jOl1
COftfCl~c:e
Pcd~1
AlIa\fIll~1
~ndfor
~r
~rlnlcticm
dl&lll~eru.& ir~nls
(2Q.Olll~
~lOJ I~
O~
~\Iru
FOIClII\~u,'tI
;IIJ*I~I SII'~y vari~
~lTeclCll r~
QRC'~
btfa~
req'lli,~
tb~ re~i~.,
BUlnj~g
~I 1lll;)D~
-"f--------------------'----~--------~-_I
~rosion ~ivf:l1l0
conYeYJl'~~ l)~tle\$.
~ --.------~---_il_-----------------~
p~'nil rcq~ircd.l\pplitllion
Ul~if,
.~ ~~1'pS
~il"
~oo.oo
~_ h,,"~
----~----~-------__._---f--------~-_i
~EllM1TS
e~1
AppJi~l~ <kl~iplioo,
I~ale
~ W.r~ ~1j(iulioJl
.if.roMtt4_m~!.bt ~C.Ot~O.
li~lioo
Ofll~
pe~ils
p(~r' .-:,(~l~,,·t;~
~ Lli(~
~-V
~'jCti Rli'~I~;h, 276~)S+·1601
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
~one
~
~
~
~
APPENDIX B
RELOCATION
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
WBS ELEMENT: 33727.1.1
TIP NO.: B-4490
COUNTY: Cumberland
DESCRIPTION: Replace Bridge No. 116 on NC 24 / 210.
ADDENDUM TO EIS RELOCATION REPORT (REVISED)
NAMES OF DISPLACED BUSINESSES:
1) Vick’s Drive In (Restaurant)
2) Trojan Labor (assumed to be a temporary employment agency)
3) Unknown (between Godwin’s Beauty Center & Illusions Night club in strip center on Rowan
behind Vick’s Drive In)
4) Illusions Night Club
5) Godwin Beauty Center / Barber Shop
6) Pedro’s Auto Body Repair
7) Chief’s 25 Plus (night club)
8) Aaron’s Tire & Auto
9) Creative Cabinet Solutions
10) American Printing & Embroidery
11) Planet Fresh Studios
12) Computer Repair (next to Planet fresh Studios)
13) Tires to Top Auto Detailing
14) Unique Image Auto Body
15) Bottom’s Up (Topless club)

Click tabs to swap between content that is broken into logical sections.

~~YV ~Q----b
g;:Y'd~ f~ /~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT COMMITMENTS .................................................................................................... i
I. TYPE OF ACTION ......................................................................................................... 1
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION .................................................................... 1
III. SELECTED ALTERNATIVE ......................................................................................... 1
IV. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ......................................................... 3
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION.......................................................................... 4
A. Distribution of the Environmental Assessment ................................................ 4
B. Comments on the Environmental Assessment .................................................. 4
C. Public Hearing ................................................................................................... 6
D. Agency Coordination ........................................................................................ 7
E. Local Coordination ............................................................................................ 7
VI. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ....................................... 8
A. Structures .......................................................................................................... 8
B. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities/Greenways/Public Facilities ........................ 8
C. Landscaping ...................................................................................................... 9
D. Avoidance, Minimization and Mitigation ......................................................... 9
E. Section 4(f)/6(f) Resources ............................................................................. 10
F. Relocation of Residences and Businesses ....................................................... 11
G. Minority/Low-Income Populations ................................................................. 11
H. Corrections to the Environmental Assessment ............................................... 11
I. Update to the Environmental Assessment ...................................................... 12
VII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT .................................... 13
MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure 1 Project Location Map
Figure 2 Proposed Improvements
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 – Project Cost Estimate.............................................................................................. 2
Table 2 – Summary of Environmental Effects……................................................................ 3
Table 3 – Correction to Table 12 of the EA Homes and Businesses to be Relocated…........ 11
APPENDICES
Appendix A – Agency Comments on the Environmental Assessment
Appendix B – Updated Relocation Report for Project
1
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
PREPARED BY THE
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IN CONSULTATION WITH THE
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
I. TYPE OF ACTION
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI).
The FHWA has determined this project will have no significant impact on the
human environment. This Finding of No Significant Impact is based upon comments
received on the November 22, 2011 Environmental Assessment (EA) and subsequent
public involvement, which has been independently evaluated by the FHWA and
determined to adequately and accurately discuss the need, environmental issues and
impacts of the proposed project and appropriate mitigation measures. The following
documentation provides sufficient evidence and analysis for determining that an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required. The FHWA takes full
responsibility for the accuracy, scope and content of the Environmental Assessment.
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
The proposed project involves the replacement of Bridge Number 116, which
carries NC 24-210 (Rowan Street) over the CSX Railroad, Norfolk Southern Railroad
and Hillsboro Street in downtown Fayetteville. The project also involves reconfiguring
the Rowan Street intersections with Bragg Boulevard and Murchison Road into a single
signalized intersection.
The proposed project is included in the approved 2012-2018 North Carolina State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The project is scheduled for right of way
acquisition and construction in federal fiscal years 2014 and 2016, respectively in the
draft 2014-2020 STIP.
III. SELECTED ALTERNATIVE
Several alternatives were considered for this project, including the no-build
alternative, a roundabout alternative and a signalized intersection alternative. In addition,
replacing only the bridge in place without making intersection improvements was also
considered (See Section III of the EA). One build alternative was selected for detailed
study in the Environmental Assessment and is the selected alternative for this project.
2
The build alternative consists of a six-lane typical section (three through lanes in
each direction separated by a median) and is proposed along NC 24-210 (Rowan Street)
from NC 24 (Bragg Boulevard) to Ray Avenue. Two twelve-foot lanes and an outside
fourteen-foot lane with curb and gutter will be provided. Existing five-foot sidewalks on
both sides of Rowan Street will be replaced. It is anticipated approximately 100 to 120
feet of right of way will be required. No control of access is proposed.
The latest cost estimate for the project is presented below.
Table 1. Project Cost Estimate
Right of Way Acquisition
(Including Utility Relocation)
$11,548,850
Construction $23,400,000
Total $34,948,850
The cost estimate for the project included in the draft 2014-2020 STIP is $36,385,000.
Of this total, $12,985,000 is estimated for right of way acquisition and utility relocation
and $23,400,000 is estimated for construction.
3
IV. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
Table 3 presents a summary of the anticipated environmental effects for the
project.
Table 2. Summary of Environmental Impacts
Project Length (miles) 0.6
Relocations Residential 0
Business 15
Total Relocations 15
Minority/Low Income Populations -
Disproportionate Impacts*
No
Historic Properties (adverse effect) No
Community Facilities Impacted** None
Section 4(f) Impacts No
Noise Impacts (impacted properties) 10
Wetlands (acres) 0
Streams (linear feet) 781
Floodplain (acres) 11.78
Forested Area (acres) 1.93
Federally Protected Species No effect
Cost Right of Way Cost $10,690,000
Utilities Cost $858,850
Construction Cost $23,400,000
Total Cost $34,948,850
* Impacts defined as disproportionate adverse impacts to
minority or low income populations.
**Impacts to schools, parks, churches, fire stations, cemeteries, etc.
4
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
A. Distribution of the Environmental Assessment
Copies of the environmental assessment were made available to the public and to
the following federal, state and local agencies:
*US Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
*US Environmental Protection Agency
US Fish and Wildlife Service – Raleigh
*NC Department of Administration – State Clearinghouse
NC Department of Cultural Resources – State Historic Preservation Office
*NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources – DENR
*DENR – NC Division of Water Quality
DENR – NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Cumberland County
City of Fayetteville
Asterisks (*) indicate agencies from which comments on the environmental
assessment were received. Copies of letters received are included in Appendix A of this
document.
B. Comments on the Environmental Assessment
Substantive comments on the environmental assessment are presented below.
US Army Corps of Engineers
COMMENT: “Please describe why the proposed intersection cannot be shifted
approximately 200-400 feet east of the proposed location. Shifting the
proposed roadways and intersection to the east would result in two
separate crossings over Cross Creek and would likely reduce the amount
of stream channel impacts, flood plain impacts and business relocations.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: As discussed in Section V-D of this document, shifting the
proposed intersection eastward to allow the construction of two shorter
culverts for Cross Creek would potentially affect the State Veterans Park
and would require a change in the grade of the realigned section of
Rowan Street between the proposed railroad grade separation and Cross
Creek. This would be within the 100-year floodplain and regulated
floodway, likely increasing the 100-year flood elevation and potentially
requiring the acquisition of additional properties. A field meeting was
held on August 15, 2012 between NCDOT, the Corps of Engineers and
the NC Division of Water Quality to review the proposed project and
discuss comments made on the environmental assessment regarding
5
shifting the alignment of the proposed intersection and bridging Cross
Creek. This meeting resolved agency concerns.
COMMENT: “The EA should describe a bridging scenario for crossing Cross Creek.
Constructing a bridge(s) would eliminate the need to fill approximately
800 feet of continuous stream channel and would avoid and/or minimize
impact to the Cross Creek and its associated floodplain.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Construction of a bridge over Cross Creek instead of the
proposed culvert would likely increase the 100-year flood elevation in the
Cross Creek floodplain, potentially requiring the acquisition of additional
properties further upstream (see Section V-D of this document).
COMMENT: “It appears that the project could potentially have disproportionately high
and adverse effects on minority and low income populations.
Environmental Justice issues should be adequately addressed with
Executive Order 12989 and mitigation measures should be described in
the FONSI or final NEPA document.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Additional coordination with minority business owners affected
by the project has been conducted; see Section V-G of this document.
This project has been implemented in accordance with Executive Order
12989.
US Environmental Protection Agency
COMMENT: “Cross Creek are class C; 303(d) waters of the State. Cross Creek is on
the 303(d) list for impaired use for aquatic life due to habitat degradation.
A recent description from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ) varies slightly from the EA information on Cross Creek
provided on page 18 [of the EA].”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Comment noted. NCDOT notes the NC DWQ description of
Cross Creek as class C; 303(d) waters of the State based on the 2012
Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list. See Section V-H.
COMMENT: “Table 7 of the EA does not describe Stream ‘SA’ which is also expected
to be impacted for 61 linear feet.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Table 7 of the EA merely presents impacts to streams. Stream
SA is an unnamed tributary to Cross Creek.
COMMENT: “The EA on page 19 does not describe any avoidance and minimization
measures to jurisdictional streams. EPA has environmental concerns that
the EA did not identify any avoidance and minimization measures to an
impaired stream.”
6
“…EPA requests that the transportation agencies identify relevant
avoidance and minimization measures to Cross Creek prior to the
issuance of the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and
incorporate these measures into preliminary hydraulic plans. EPA
requests that impacts to floodplain and riparian buffers to Cross Creek be
minimized to the greatest extent practicable.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: See Section V-D of this document.
NC Division of Water Quality
COMMENT: “Although this project is not being proposed to be placed in the
404/NEPA Merger Process. Given the potentially substantial impacts to
Cross Creek associated with the project, NCDWQ would like the
opportunity to review and comments on the project’s preliminary plans
typically provided at the 4B and 4C stage of the Merger Process.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Comment noted.
COMMENT: “Cross Creek are class C; 303(d) waters of the State. Cross Creek is on
the 303(d) list for impaired use for aquatic life due to habitat degradation.
DWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could
result from this project. DWQ recommends that the most protective
sediment and erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce the risk of
nutrient runoff to Cross Creek. DWQ requests that road design plans
provide treatment of the storm water runoff through best management
practices as detailed in the most recent version of NC DWQ Stormwater
Best Management Practices.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: As discussed in the environmental assessment, NCDOT’s Best
Management Practices for the protection of surface waters will be strictly
enforced to reduce impacts to Cross Creek during all construction phases.
COMMENT: “DWQ requests that all jurisdictional features identified within the study
area in Figure 5 (Environmental Features in Project Area) of this
document also be shown in Figure 2 (Current Study Alternative) to assist
in identifying minimization and avoidance within study alternative.”
NCDOT RESPONSE: Figure 2 of this document depicts the jurisdictional features, as
requested.
C. Public Hearing
In accordance with 23 U.S.C. 128, the North Carolina Department of
Transportation certifies that a public hearing for the subject project has been held and the
social, economic, and environmental impacts, consistency with local community planning
goals and objectives, and comments from individuals have been considered in the
selection of the recommended alternative for the project.
7
A formal public hearing was held for the project on August 20, 2012 at the
Airborne and Special Operations Museum in downtown Fayetteville. A local officials
meeting was also held on August 6, 2012.
Approximately 61 citizens attended the hearing. Eight written comments were
received during the hearing comment period. Three comments focused on providing for
left turn movements onto and from SR 3147 (West Rowan Street) at Bragg Boulevard.
One comment was made at the hearing regarding safety of pedestrians using sidewalks
along the proposed project.
D. Agency Coordination
A field meeting was held on August 15, 2012 with NCDOT personnel, the Corps
of Engineers and the NC Division of Water Quality to review the proposed project and
discuss comments made on the environmental assessment regarding a bridging alternative
of Cross Creek and the possibility of shifting the alignment of the proposed relocated
intersection.
It was discussed that much of the proposed project lies within the 100-year
floodplain and regulated floodway for Cross Creek. Replacement of the existing culvert
with a bridge over Cross Creek would likely increase the 100-year flood water surface
elevation upstream and potentially require the acquisition of additional properties further
upstream.
It was also discussed that shifting the alignment of the proposed intersection to
the east to possibly create two separate crossings over Cross Creek and minimize impacts
would not be practical as it would require a change in the grade of the realigned section
of Rowan Street between the proposed railroad grade separation and Cross Creek. This
would be within the 100-year floodplain and regulated floodway, likely increasing the
100-year flood elevation and potentially requiring the acquisition of additional properties.
Due to the urban nature of the project area and discussions from this field
meeting, the project is not being considered for placement in the NEPA/404 Merger
Process at this time.
E. Local Coordination
Following completion of the environmental assessment, NCDOT reviewed and
responded to items the City requested be included as part of the project in their October
14, 2011 letter (see Appendix A of the environmental assessment).
It has been determined the following items can be included as part of the proposed
project through the execution of a municipal agreement. The City will be required to
fund the additional cost for the special requests listed below:
8
Brick colored stamped concrete where raised median is less than six feet wide.
Black powder-coated traffic signal poles at the proposed realigned intersection
of Bragg Boulevard, Murchison Road and Rowan Street.
Black powder-coated traffic signal poles and mast arms at the intersection of
Ray Avenue and Rowan Street.
Conduit for irrigation pipes.
Items that have been agreed to and will be included at no cost to the City of
Fayetteville are:
Grass medians where median width is greater than six feet, with the exception
of the median along Rowan Street between the proposed Murchison
Road/Bragg Boulevard/Rowan Street intersection and Ray Avenue, which
will be brick colored stamped concrete.
Electrical conduit on both sides of proposed bridges for future lighting
(lighting to be installed and maintained through encroachment by the City).
High visibility pavement markings at the intersections.
Eight-foot pedestrian refuge islands at the proposed intersection.
In addition, the City also requested an accelerated utility relocation schedule. As
the final plans are developed, NCDOT will coordinate with the City and Fayetteville’s
Public Works Commission (PWC) to enhance the utility relocation schedule and possibly
accelerate utility relocation funding.
VI. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
A. Structures
NCDOT, FAMPO and the City of Fayetteville had discussed constructing a
pedestrian culvert to carry the Little Cross Creek Trail under relocated Rowan Street as
part of this project (see Sections IV-I, IV-J and V-D-4 of the environmental assessment).
The culvert would have been funded by FAMPO. However, following completion of the
environmental assessment, FAMPO withdrew their request for a pedestrian culvert. No
pedestrian culvert is proposed for the project.
As discussed in Section IV-E of this document, electrical conduit will be provided
on both sides of proposed bridges for future lighting (lighting to be installed and
maintained through encroachment by the City).
B. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities/Greenways/Public Facilities
The Little Cross Creek Trail is a proposed multi-use trail that is expected to
connect existing greenway trails between Cross Creek in the project study area. The trail
is being developed by the Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
(FAMPO).
9
A portion of the proposed Little Cross Creek Trail will be constructed as a part of
this project, if FAMPO will agree in writing to participate in the cost and to accept
maintenance and liability for the trail. A ten-foot wide multi-use path will be constructed
on the west side of Murchison Road between the proposed Murchison Road/Rowan
Street/Bragg Boulevard intersection and the northern limits of the project. The trail will
cross Rowan Street at-grade utilizing the pedestrian crosswalk. Additional right of way
required for the trail and any additional cost of the path above the cost of a five-foot
sidewalk will be funded by FAMPO. A municipal agreement will be prepared regarding
the trail prior to construction.
As discussed in Section V-A of this document, a pedestrian culvert under
relocated Rowan Street is no longer proposed by FAMPO for the Little Cross Creek
Trail.
As discussed in Section IV-E of this document, eight-foot pedestrian refuge
islands will be provided at the proposed Murchison Road/Bragg Boulevard/Rowan Street
intersection.
C. Landscaping
At the request of the City of Fayetteville (see Section IV-E), proposed medians
and islands wider than six feet will be landscaped, with the exception of the median along
Rowan Street between the proposed Murchison Road/Rowan Street/Bragg Boulevard
intersection and Ray Avenue. The median on Rowan Street between the proposed
intersection and Ray Avenue will be brick colored stamped concrete. Appropriate
landscaping will also be provided at the proposed Murchison Road/Bragg
Boulevard/Rowan Street intersection. Following project construction, NCDOT can
provide landscaping appropriate for the design speed and median width on the project.
NCDOT can fund landscaping in an amount up to 0.5 percent of the project construction
cost. The City would be responsible for maintaining any landscaping. If the City prefers,
it may submit its own landscaping plan for review, provided the City agrees to fund and
maintain it. For islands less than six feet in width, stamped concrete can be used if the
City will agree to pay the additional estimated cost.
NCDOT will coordinate with the City to include conduit for irrigation pipes in the
project plans, provided the City will agree to fund and maintain the conduit.
A municipal agreement will be prepared for these items prior to project
construction.
D. Avoidance, Minimization and Mitigation
As presented on Table 2 of this document, the proposed project will affect a total
of 781 feet of jurisdictional streams. At Cross Creek, the project will require the
replacement of two existing approximately 70-foot and 100-foot long culverts with an
approximately 720-foot long culvert. The project will also require piping an additional
61 feet of Stream SA, which is an unnamed tributary to Cross Creek.
10
Due to their location, avoiding these streams is not possible. Existing Rowan
Street crosses both streams. Construction of a bridge over Cross Creek instead of the
proposed culvert would likely increase the 100-year flood elevation in the Cross Creek
floodplain, potentially requiring the acquisition of additional properties further upstream.
Alignment shifts to minimize stream impacts are not possible due to other
constraints, such as the railroads, the State Veterans Park, Festival Park and historic
properties. Shifting the proposed intersection eastward to allow the construction of two
shorter culverts for Cross Creek would potentially affect the State Veterans Park and
would require a change in the grade of the realigned section of Rowan Street between the
proposed railroad grade separation and Cross Creek. This would be within the 100-year
floodplain and regulated floodway and result in additional fill and further constriction of
the floodplain and regulated floodway, likely increasing the 100-year flood elevation and
potentially requiring the acquisition of additional properties.
As discussed in Section V-A-3-c of the environmental assessment, final decisions
regarding wetland and stream mitigation requirements will be made by the US Army
Corps of Engineers and the NC Division of Water Quality. On-site mitigation will be
used as much as possible. The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will be used for
remaining mitigation requirements beyond what can be satisfied by on-site mitigation.
E. Section 4(f)/6(f) Resources
As discussed in Section V-C of the environmental assessment, a temporary
construction easement is proposed within a portion of Festival Park, which is located
south of Rowan Street between the railroad tracks and Ray Avenue (see Figure 2). The
temporary construction easement involves a temporary occupancy of the park, a Section
4(f) resource. The temporary construction easement is needed due to a change in the
roadway grade adjacent to Festival Park. No change in ownership of the land will occur.
The City of Fayetteville’s Parks and Recreation Director has reviewed the project
and is in agreement with the proposed project. In an email dated October 21, 2011 and a
memorandum dated November 17, 2011, the Parks and Recreation Director and the
Interim Director for Engineering and Infrastructure agreed the proposed project will not
adversely affect any activities, features or attributes of Festival Park. A copy of the email
and memorandum were included in Appendix A of the environmental assessment. The
public was afforded an opportunity to review and comment on the project’s effects on
Festival Park at the August 20, 2012 public hearing held for this project (see Section IV-C)
and no comments were received.
FHWA has determined that the proposed temporary easement constitutes a
temporary occupancy of public park property based on the criteria contained in 23 CFR
774.13(d). A Section 4(f) evaluation is not required for obtaining temporary construction
easements for this project.
11
F. Relocation of Residences and Businesses
Since the completion of the environmental assessment, a minor change to the
preliminary design has resulted in two additional business relocations. Originally, it was
anticipated 13 businesses would be relocated. Table 4 below presents the anticipated
number of homes and businesses which would be relocated by the proposed project. A
copy of the revised relocation report can be found in Appendix B.
Table 3. Correction to Table 12 of EA
Homes and Businesses to be Relocated
Homes Businesses
0 15[10]
Numbers in bracket(s) [ ] indicate minority-owned
homes or businesses
G. Minority/Low-Income Populations
The majority of the businesses to be relocated by the project are minority-owned.
A commitment was included in the environmental assessment to hold a special meeting
for the minority-owned businesses expected to be relocated to allow them the opportunity
to review and comment on the project. NCDOT and FAMPO staff visited the businesses
on January 5, 2012 in order to obtain contact information for any businesses that might be
tenants and to inform them of the special meeting. Eight of fifteen business owners were
contacted during the site visit. The other businesses were either closed or the buildings
were vacant. Staff provided general information regarding the project, including
schedule and project impact to businesses. Most business owners were aware of the
project and that they would be impacted.
The special meeting was held on August 20, 2012 at the Airborne and Special
Operations Museum in Fayetteville. Three business owners attended the meeting. A
formal presentation was given and the proposed preliminary design was presented for
review and comment. No objections to the project were expressed at the meeting. No
other outstanding issues were noted.
The public has been kept informed of the proposed project through the public
involvement program, coordination with local officials, and accommodation of local
development plans. This project is being implemented in accordance with Executive
Order 12898.
H. Corrections to the Environmental Assessment
Other Highway Projects in the Area
Section II-B-1-g of the environmental assessment did not include a nearby project
in the list of other highway projects in the area. TIP Project R-5513 involves resurfacing
NC 24-87 (Bragg Boulevard) from Rowan Street to US 401 Bypass. This project is
12
scheduled for right of way acquisition and construction in fiscal years 2013 and 2014,
respectively.
Water Quality Monitoring Data
On Page 18 of the environmental assessment, an error in the classification status
for Cross Creek has been identified. The environmental assessment stated Cross Creek is
listed on the 2010 Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list as impaired waters for aquatic life,
due to the fair bio-classification it received in 2008. This statement is incorrect. Cross
Creek is listed on the 2012 Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list as impaired waters for
aquatic life, due to habitat degradation.
Stream Impacts
An error was discovered in the stream impact calculation for impacts to Cross
Creek in the environmental assessment. Table 7 of the EA presents the impact to Cross
Creek as 800 linear feet. Table 2 and section V-D of this document present the correct
stream impacts of 781 linear feet for the selected alternative presented in the
environmental assessment.
Project Effects on Historic Resources
A typographical error was discovered on Page 26 of the environmental
assessment. The date for concurrence of project effects on historic resources was August
9, 2011, not August 9, 2010.
I. Update to the Environmental Assessment
NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate as of January 24, 2012, Bridge
Number 116 has a sufficiency rating of 4 out of a possible 100. The bridge is considered
structurally deficient and therefore is still eligible for FHWA’s Highway Bridge
Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. On Page iii, 2 and 4 of the environmental
assessment the sufficiency rating was identified as 7 out of a possible 100. This rating
was from a previous inspection report dated May 25, 2010.
13
VII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon environmental studies and coordination with appropriate federal,
state, and local agencies and comments received from the public, it is the finding of the
Federal Highway Administration and the North Carolina Department of Transportation
that the proposed action will have no significant impact upon the quality of the human
environment. This action is based on public involvement and comments received on the
environmental assessment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement will not be
required.
The following persons may be contacted for additional information concerning
this proposal and statement:
John F. Sullivan, III
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Telephone: (919) 856-4346
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Telephone: (919) 707-6000
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
~
I~Y
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
´
Ε Ε
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
APPENDIX A
COMMENTS RECEIVED
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Si~9~t;ly" -~
(~hri~~;:"'er Militsch~
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
~-.
~ 0~'",--·
N~jmCarolina
12~0150
~o.
I)rojl~cl
B~4490
~
~
Wi(t·s~ ~le..
±2.~a=:
~
~
~
Thi~ ~;~
~
W~shington
\Yin~lon-Salcm
-~AYETTE'!:LlE
1an;l~er
appJic,"~::,
\\~
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Proj~INlMllllClJ'" ,~I(, ~,~
I~;t.W 3od1ol'I'JI'IOV'~ to~'Ply
I~ 'C~U1C u.r~_lionand
el~li~el(J ~se p~f\S
tuh~ical
disehar~1:
~IU
AJlPIi~riOQ
~IC'IIIaiU
~
-----..,.~---------- --I-------.....:.-------~-------+-------_
~tIlptdc
V~f",;1
Ajlpl~[jOl1
COftfCl~c:e
Pcd~1
AlIa\fIll~1
~ndfor
~r
~rlnlcticm
dl&lll~eru.& ir~nls
(2Q.Olll~
~lOJ I~
O~
~\Iru
FOIClII\~u,'tI
;IIJ*I~I SII'~y vari~
~lTeclCll r~
QRC'~
btfa~
req'lli,~
tb~ re~i~.,
BUlnj~g
~I 1lll;)D~
-"f--------------------'----~--------~-_I
~rosion ~ivf:l1l0
conYeYJl'~~ l)~tle\$.
~ --.------~---_il_-----------------~
p~'nil rcq~ircd.l\pplitllion
Ul~if,
.~ ~~1'pS
~il"
~oo.oo
~_ h,,"~
----~----~-------__._---f--------~-_i
~EllM1TS
e~1
AppJi~l~