Review My PDF

Generate My PDF

If you are generating a PDF of a journal article or book chapter, please feel free to enter the title and author information. The information you enter here will be stored in the downloaded file to assist you in managing your downloaded PDFs locally.

Thank you for your request. Please wait for an email containing a link to download the PDF.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

Join Our Mailing List

Sign up to receive the latest BHL news, content highlights, and promotions.

line 23underline "like ... a"lines 21—27scorelines 1—24annotationthis is like Waterhouses remark that low groups vary much, from End Slip 1annotationp. 181 Waterhouse — low in scale; from End Slip 2annotation181 do — animals on confines of groups present great differences

lines 29—34scorelines 29—51annotationaccording to this, if there were many Monotremes, they wd vary much.—

lines 21—25scorelines 33—37scorelines 1—35annotationassumes the series to be perfect & a tendency to higher development — from End Slip 2annotation197. Argument (Owen) against Transmutation — Resting on assumed rise in development — Grand discussion.—

Page198

lines 12—14scorelines 12—42annotationmust confess even on my view imperfection of record surprising —

lines 22—25score

lines 36—38score

⇑lines 8—2score

Page199

lines 3—5score

lines 7—9score

lines 18—30score

lines 32—44score

lines 49—54score

Page200

lines 1—8score

lines 29—33score

lines 45—51score

whole-marginannotationDo those geologists who tacitly think the record pretty perfect — think that there were only 3 Mammifers during Oolitic & only . — Reptiles during Carboniferous & so many in Permean & Triassic