-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:29:30 -0400
> Von: Steven Toth <stoth at linuxtv.org>
> An: linux-dvb <linux-dvb at linuxtv.org>
> Betreff: [linux-dvb] DVB-S2 / Multiproto and future modulation support
> Regarding the multiproto situation:
>> A number of developers, maintainers and users are unhappy with the
> multiproto situation, actually they've been unhappy for a considerable
> amount of time. The linuxtv developer community (to some degree) is seen
> as a joke and a bunch in-fighting people. Multiproto is a great
> demonstration of this. [1] The multiproto project has gone too far, for
> too long and no longer has any credibility in the eyes of many people.
>> In response, a number developers have agreed that "enough is enough" and
> "it's time to take a new direction", for these developers the technical,
> political and personal cost of multiproto is too high. These developers
> have decided to make an announcement.
>> Mauro Chehab, Michael Krufky, Patrick Boettcher and myself are hereby
> announcing that we no longer support multiproto and are forming a
> smaller dedicated project group which is focusing on adding next
> generation S2/ISDB-T/DVB-H/DVB-T2/DVB-SH support to the kernel through a
> different and simpler API.
>> Basic patches and demo code for this API is currently available here.
>>http://www.steventoth.net/linux/s2>> Does it even work? Yes
> Is this new API complete? No
> Is it perfect? No, we've already had feedback on structural and
> namingspace changes that people would like to see.
> Does it have bugs? Of course, we have a list of things we already know
> we want to fix.
>> but ...
>> Is the new approach flexible? Yes, we're moving away from passing fixed
> modulation structures into the kernel.
> Can we add to it without breaking the future ABI when unforseen
> modulations types occur? Yes
> Does it preserve backwards compatibility? Yes
> Importantly, is the overall direction correct? Yes
> Does it impact existing frontend drivers? No.
> What's the impact to dvb-core? Small.
> What's the impact to application developers? None, unless an application
> developer wants to support the new standards - binary compatibility!
>> We want feedback and we want progress, we aim to achieve it.
>> Importantly, this project group seeks your support.
>> If you also feel frustrated by the multiproto situation and agree in
> principle with this new approach, and the overall direction of the API
> changes, then we welcome you and ask you to help us.
>> Growing the list of supporting names by 100%, and allowing us to publish
> your name on the public mailing list, would show the non-maintainer
> development community that we recognize the problem and we're taking
> steps to correct the problem. We want to make LinuxTV a perfect platform
> for S2, ISDB-T and other advanced modulation types, without using the
> multiproto patches.
>> We're not asking you for technical help, although we'd like that :) ,
> we're just asking for your encouragement to move away from multiproto.
>> If you feel that you want to support our movement then please help us by
> acking this email.
>> Regards - Steve, Mike, Patrick and Mauro.
>> Acked-by: Patrick Boettcher <pb at linuxtv.org>
> Acked-by: Michael Krufky <mkrufky at linuxtv.org>
> Acked-by: Steven Toth <stoth at linuxtv.org>
> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab at infradead.org>
>> * [1]. Rather than point out the issues with multiproto here, take a
> look at the patches and/or read the comments on the mailing lists.
>> _______________________________________________
> linux-dvb mailing list
>linux-dvb at linuxtv.org>http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
Dear Steve, Michael, Patrick and Mauro,
wow! Let me be the first to congratulate all of you on taking a bold, decisive step, which
I am sure with your combined talents can be successful. I agree that it is time to move on
from the multiproto era and work to create something to be proud of. Your alternative approach
sounds intriguing. I will take some time to try and understand your patch before commenting
any further.
Best regards,
Hans
Acked-by: Hans Werner <hwerner4 at gmx.de>
--
Release early, release often. Really, you should.
Psssst! Schon das coole Video vom GMX MultiMessenger gesehen?
Der Eine für Alle: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/messenger03