ROTFLMAO, you sound like Trump,he claims that he watches very little TV, which we know is a blatant lie and furthermore, it's proven that his reading skills are minimal to say the least.

So says a troll on the internet.

Like most Trump supporters, they possess very little cranial matter, so learning from one's mistakes is totally out of the question, even a trained seal can do better.

Quote:

even a trained seal can do better.

Better than What?

Answer, a trained seal memorizes the commands given it and is rewarded a nice treat, you on the other hand have increasingly become more and more antagonistic and downright acting like a spoiled petulant child ......the Moderators warned you several times about such behavior or are you unlike the trained seal? :D

_________________________
I know how to bring out the buffoonery of A Trump supporter.State Fact

The frequent talking point is Democrats can't get over the fact that Trump won yet over the last three years it's been surmise that he won by intervention of Russian involvement. Amazingly over this period every effort to exonerate him self has been met with resistance and their response of hatred is their only submission. Over the last three years, we've witnesses lies and obstruction on the part of the party. I find it so hypocritical on behalf of the Republicans that Obama was met with the same resistance for the sole reason(s)) he had one wife, a very attractive and educated wife, two beautiful children, he himself was very articulate and educate and never had a scandal levied toward him in regard to buddying up with foreign dictators etc. So I guess that Conservatives hated his policies and all the resistance had nothing to do with color etc. How soon hypocrites forget.

On Dec. 11, Gun Owners of America argued before the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals that the government’s recently enacted ban on bump stocks is illegal.

The organization's argument is by no means controversial. The government bureau that made them illegal, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, even admitted in a court filing that it lacks authority under the Gun Control Act and National Firearms Act to issue the rule. In short, it violated the Second Amendment as a way of reaping more power for itself, and that should not be tolerated.

The GOA can and will continue fighting the illicit actions of gun regulators as they arise in court, and they will be penalized; however, this piecemeal approach can only go so far. It is high time for Second Amendment advocates in Congress and the White House to begin taking action to reform the rogue bureau.

After all, this isn’t the first time the ATF has disregarded the law. Just recently, a federal judge similarly found the bureau to have been enforcing laws that don’t exist against gun owners. The bureau has been pretending that receivers are bound by the same draconian D.C. regulations as entire put-together firearms and have been threatening their manufacturers with prosecution for not going through the full regulatory process.

The methods the bureau has used to generate firearm cases against the American people have always been questionable. In the 1970s and 1980s, Congress studied the issue closely, with a Senate subcommittee report ultimately concluding that “it is apparent that ATF enforcement tactics made possible by current federal firearms laws are constitutionally, legally, and practically reprehensible."

Its cousin organization, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, is no better. The tax bureau used to be a part of the ATF, but in 2002, the Homeland Security Act divided the organization into two. The tax bureau’s half is now responsible for tax collection, labeling regulations, and trade oversight, and it remains just as reckless as the ATF.

The tax bureau pointedly refuses to provide clarity to its obscure, complex mandates. As former Treasurer Bay Buchanan pointed out, “Ever since its foundation, TTB has seemingly gone out of its way to ensure that firearms and ammo merchants remain out of compliance with the law.”

Like the ATF, the tax bureau also has no problem violating the law. For example, it recently proposed Notice No. 176, a rule that it alleges will "eliminate unnecessary regulatory requirements and provide consumers broader purchasing options." Over a dozen conservative organizations have called out the illegality of this proposed rule, which they say will cost hundreds of millions of dollars. In a letter to the administration, they said it violates President Trump’s Executive Order 13771, which calls for the elimination of two regulations for every new one proposed, as well as Executive Order 12866 from the Clinton years, which mandates the Office of Management and Budget review any regulatory action that will cost the economy $100 million or more.

Unelected government bureaucrats should not be allowed to continue increasing the size of the regulatory state and infringing on the people’s Second Amendment rights, not when Republicans control the Senate and the White House.

With the ATF’s abuses are still being reported in the news and are fresh on the public’s mind, now is the time for the Senate to begin holding hearings and getting to the bottom of the exploitation.

The Senate Judiciary Committee should call in ATF head Regina Lombardo to discuss the bureau's legal violations and what steps, if any, are being taken to correct them.

Meanwhile, Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy’s Senate appropriations subcommittee should call the tax bureau’s leaders, Mary J. Ryan and Daniel Riordan, in to see if they accept the deregulatory and transparency orders currently on the books and what action, if any, they are taking to ensure compliance.

If the ATF's or the tax bureau's leaders refuse to come before Congress or give lackluster answers to congressional questioning, the Trump administration can and should replace both. As luck would have it, Lombardo, Ryan, and Riordan are only serving in acting roles, so the White House has every right to replace them with permanent leadership officials at any time. In the case of the tax bureau, this would not even require Senate confirmation.

Gun Owners of America will continue to monitor the behavior of both bureaus and fight their illegal activity in court, but substantive change will never occur if we do not receive a helping hand from our friends in Congress and the White House.

One huge weakness to your premise, tell us what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution allowed for bump stock, hollowed tip bullets, and military type weapons. A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts...watch

_________________________
I know how to bring out the buffoonery of A Trump supporter.State Fact

One huge weakness to your premise, tell us what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution allowed for bump stock, hollowed tip bullets, and military type weapons. A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts...watch

Quote:

what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution

Who do you think you are to tell anyone to answer your stupid questions!

Quote:

A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts

Best part is, he doesn't have to submit Jack to you!

_________________________
I don't care what your race is, you're a stupid person, and a Liar.17=Q

One huge weakness to your premise, tell us what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution allowed for bump stock, hollowed tip bullets, and military type weapons. A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts...watch

Quote:

what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution

Who do you think you are to tell anyone to answer your stupid questions!

Quote:

A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts

Best part is, he doesn't have to submit Jack to you!

You're exactly right my son but he has to answer to God and the American citizens who understand full well when lies and misinformation are submitted. HMMMMMM the same premise hold true for our lying president who has contribute 15000 times toward his ticket to Hell unless he apologize to the American people and God. BTW son, a big talking point of Republicans is that 63 million people voted for Trump and the Democrat are defying the will of those voters, may I refresh your memory by reminding you that 66 million people voted for Hillary, so by popular consensus, guess who still have a say? Lastly my boy, so many million of Clinton and Trump would be voters construe that Trump was the underdog and elected to stay home,so by the popular outcome Trump can't emphatically state that he WAS THE CHOSEN ONE can he? So in essence, any question pose by me or any other can be fairly submitted and as usual, you may hypocritically negate to respond due to your endeavor to at least spare yourself and the observer a few more lies.

One huge weakness to your premise, tell us what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution allowed for bump stock, hollowed tip bullets, and military type weapons. A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts...watch

Quote:

what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution

Who do you think you are to tell anyone to answer your stupid questions!

Quote:

A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts

Best part is, he doesn't have to submit Jack to you!

The answer is military-style weapons. Not an answer that the left likes to hear. Of course, it is illegal to own a military-style rifle today unless it was manufacture before 1986 and you have federal firearms permit.

After three years in office, President Trump has thus far installed 187 judges to the federal bench, as he continues to stack the federal judiciary with conservatives.

Last week, as House Democrats voted to impeach the president, the Senate confirmed 13 more district court judges.

As 2019 comes to a close, a full one in four circuit court judges — second in power only to Supreme Court justices — have been appointed by the 45th president. For comparison: Barack Obama, at the same point in his presidency, had confirmed 25 circuit court judges; Trump has confirmed 50.

Trump's 50 circuit court judges through three years are just five shy of the 55 Obama confirmed in his entire eight-year tenure.

As the Washington Post describes:

After three years in office, President Donald Trump has remade the federal judiciary, ensuring a conservative tilt for decades and cementing his legacy no matter the outcome of November's election.

One huge weakness to your premise, tell us what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution allowed for bump stock, hollowed tip bullets, and military type weapons. A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts...watch

Quote:

what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution

Who do you think you are to tell anyone to answer your stupid questions!

Quote:

A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts

Best part is, he doesn't have to submit Jack to you!

The answer is military-style weapons. Not an answer that the left likes to hear. Of course, it is illegal to own a military-style rifle today unless it was manufacture before 1986 and you have federal firearms permit.

I love when a fool makes a further fool of themselves, you've failed to submit the article in the Constitution that allowed a citizen to own the same weapon that our military units utilize. Furthermore, if we as a country allow citizen to carry weapons for military use, why have a military in the first place. Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines, you may all go home because the common citizen has it all covered....you sound so foolish to say the least

_________________________
I know how to bring out the buffoonery of A Trump supporter.State Fact

After three years in office, President Trump has thus far installed 187 judges to the federal bench, as he continues to stack the federal judiciary with conservatives.

Last week, as House Democrats voted to impeach the president, the Senate confirmed 13 more district court judges.

As 2019 comes to a close, a full one in four circuit court judges — second in power only to Supreme Court justices — have been appointed by the 45th president. For comparison: Barack Obama, at the same point in his presidency, had confirmed 25 circuit court judges; Trump has confirmed 50.

Trump's 50 circuit court judges through three years are just five shy of the 55 Obama confirmed in his entire eight-year tenure.

As the Washington Post describes:

After three years in office, President Donald Trump has remade the federal judiciary, ensuring a conservative tilt for decades and cementing his legacy no matter the outcome of November's election.

I love when a Trumpster does a full 180 degree turn when cornered on a question, change the topic.

_________________________
I know how to bring out the buffoonery of A Trump supporter.State Fact

One huge weakness to your premise, tell us what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution allowed for bump stock, hollowed tip bullets, and military type weapons. A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts...watch

Quote:

what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution

Who do you think you are to tell anyone to answer your stupid questions!

Quote:

A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts

Best part is, he doesn't have to submit Jack to you!

The answer is military-style weapons. Not an answer that the left likes to hear. Of course, it is illegal to own a military-style rifle today unless it was manufacture before 1986 and you have federal firearms permit.

Maybe the Brit understood the premise of allowing ordinary citizens the right to bear arms outside the purpose of hunting for food. Here we are 240 years later and guess who has 50 time less gun fatalities than United States?

_________________________
I know how to bring out the buffoonery of A Trump supporter.State Fact

One huge weakness to your premise, tell us what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution allowed for bump stock, hollowed tip bullets, and military type weapons. A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts...watch

Quote:

what guns existed when the second amendment was written and tell us exactly what article in said Constitution

Who do you think you are to tell anyone to answer your stupid questions!

Quote:

A hundred to one you'll fail to submit such facts

Best part is, he doesn't have to submit Jack to you!

The answer is military-style weapons. Not an answer that the left likes to hear. Of course, it is illegal to own a military-style rifle today unless it was manufacture before 1986 and you have federal firearms permit.

Maybe the Brit understood the premise of allowing ordinary citizens the right to bear arms outside the purpose of hunting for food. Here we are 240 years later and guess who has 50 time less gun fatalities than United States?

What you think, and or your opinion, is meaningless to me! font size 17= Q+

_________________________
I don't care what your race is, you're a stupid person, and a Liar.17=Q

You poor pathetic soul, I just got back from Christmas shopping and preparing for a huge family get together tomorrow, here it is Christmas eve and you can't even conjure up a little holiday cheer. God Bless you Sir, I'll get back to you later in the week after enjoying friends and family.

_________________________
I know how to bring out the buffoonery of A Trump supporter.State Fact

You poor pathetic soul, I just got back from Christmas shopping and preparing for a huge family get together tomorrow, here it is Christmas eve and you can't even conjure up a little holiday cheer. God Bless you Sir, I'll get back to you later in the week after enjoying friends and family.

_________________________
I don't care what your race is, you're a stupid person, and a Liar.17=Q

You poor pathetic soul, I just got back from Christmas shopping and preparing for a huge family get together tomorrow, here it is Christmas eve and you can't even conjure up a little holiday cheer. God Bless you Sir, I'll get back to you later in the week after enjoying friends and family.

You poor pathetic soul, I just got back from Christmas shopping and preparing for a huge family get together tomorrow, here it is Christmas eve and you can't even conjure up a little holiday cheer. God Bless you Sir, I'll get back to you later in the week after enjoying friends and family.

That sounds like it fits Trump to a t!

Fits you Ben44.

_________________________
I don't care what your race is, you're a stupid person, and a Liar.17=Q