If you live in one of the communities listed in this alert, please attend the village/city meeting and voice your opposition to any ordinance banning firearms, firearm accessories, and/or magazines in your community!

Let's stop these bans in their tracks! Attend your city council meeting. Remember to keep your statements short and to the point. Be respectful but firm in your resolve. Remember to ask the council these two important questions:

1. What are the current statistics of these particular firearms being used in crimes in your community?

2. Does your community have the financial resources to set aside for funding a legal defense of the ban in a court challenge?

The meetings are open to the public, plan to arrive early to be sure you get a seat. If you cannot attend, please contact your council members and let them know the people in your community do not want any further infringements on their right to keep and bear arms!

Please contact your city council members and urge them to vote NO on any ordinance that would ban firearms or otherwise infringe on your Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Park Ridge will consider an "assault" weapons ban during a Procedures and Regulations Committee meeting on June 24. If you live/work in the Park Ridge area, please attend this important meeting. In the meantime, please contact the city council members and voice your opposition to any ordinance that infringes on the right to keep and bear arms. Please be polite but firm when communicating with council members.

All it will take is one community getting this struck down in the courts, and he rest will fall like dominos. Just a matter of time, and a matter of which community it will be. Many are much 'softer' targets for litigation than Cook/Chicago, due to having less litigation defense money and being in a different court district, for the most part.

Hopefully, there is a lawsuit ready to go - asking for an injunction to prevent the law going into effect.

I had to look up "Zerg Rush". Nice reference. And I think it fits. They're trying to do as much as possible all at once, without any though to it. The goal is to get all these AWB's passed before anyone can respond. When people notice, they don't like such bans.