While last week the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rolled back net neutrality rules that allowed the internet to be regulated as a public utility, the United Kingdom announced Wednesday that by 2020, high-speed internet will be a legal right for all British households and businesses.

Rejecting an offer from the British communications company BT to voluntarily provide universal broadband access and improve speeds in rural regions on their own timeline, the U.K. Department of Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport has adopted a universal service obligation (USO) stipulating that by 2020, speeds of at least 10Mbps—or what’s “needed to meet the requirements of an average family”—must be available nationwide.

The department told the Guardian that officials felt BT’s proposal was not “strong enough for us to take the regulatory USO off the table, and have therefore decided not to pursue BT’s proposal, in favor of providing a legal right to broadband.”

“We are grateful to BT for their proposal but have decided that only a regulatory approach will make high speed broadband a reality for everyone in the U.K., regardless of where they live or work,” said Culture Secretary Karen Bradley. “We know how important broadband is to homes and businesses and we want everyone to benefit from a fast and reliable connection.”

In a statement, the department outlines the consumer benefits to a regulatory approach:

the minimum speed of connection can be increased over time as consumers’ connectivity requirements evolve;

it provides for greater enforcement to help ensure households and businesses do get connected;

the scheme will maximize the provision of fixed line connections in the hardest to reach areas;

[and it] places a legal requirement for high speed broadband to be provided to anyone requesting it, subject to a cost threshold (in the same way the universal service right to a landline telephone works).

Digital Minister Matt Hancock explained on BBC Radio 4 that the right to access high-speed internet does not mean it will be delivered automatically to all households, but rather that “it’s about having the right to demand it,” so “if you don’t go on the internet and aren’t interested then you won’t phone up and demand this.”

The decision comes less than a week after a report from Ofcom, the U.K.’s communications regulator, revealed that four percent of homes, or over a million households, do not have access to broadband speeds of at least 10Mbps. The report showed that speeds were notably worse in rural areas.

While the U.K. is now on a path to provide all residents with access to high-speed internet over the new few years, last week federal regulators in the United States voted to terminaterules that barred internet service providers (ISPs) from creating “fast lanes,” and slowing or blocking access to certain websites.

As news of the U.K. decision broke Wednesday, advocates for net neutrality started comparing the two governments’ priorities, with not only internet access, but also topics including healthcare and transportation:

France is banning fossil fuel production & the UK just announced it’s making high-speed internet a right.

It’s like the rest of the world is looking at the US & going, “Let’s do the exact opposite of THAT.”

After US kills net neutrality — UK decides high-speed internet is a legal right of all citizens https://t.co/CRzPz49lJd As we watch the US slide backwards into the land of corporate greed, the world walks by us without looking back.
Hi speed rail anyone? Wrong country for that

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Stories published in our Daily Digests section are chosen based on the interest of our readers. They are
republished from a number of sources, and are not produced by MintPress News. The views expressed in
these
articles are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect MintPress News editorial policy.

Meanwhile the UK openly records all internet communications and censors access and freedom of speech.

gmatch

Meanwhile the US does the same and charges much more for an already lame US Internet.

Beano

The U.K. literally blocks websites deemed inappropriate (not by age, nor via parental discretion advisory, complete universal blocking).
Say what you will about the US but none of the domestic ISPs nor the government has that kind of authority, even with the repeal of Net Neutrality.
Basically, you couldn’t be more wrong.

The recent devastating car bombing in Mogadishu has been blamed by Somali officials on the terrorist group al-Shabab. But the violence (and famine) that have beset Somalia have deeper roots — decades of imperialism and intervention, and use of Somalia as a staging grounds for the “war on terror.”

Buried among statistics on gun profits and lobbying efforts is the terrifying reality of just how unique America’s gun obsession and associated violence are. And the equally terrifying plan by the NRA to “normalize” gun possession in nearly every nook and cranny of American life.

U.S. campaigns for regime change characteristically focus on the “madness” of the “dictators” to be toppled. In the case of North Korea, the narrative is spiced by the country’s developing nuclear capabilities — which North Korea views as its main line of defense against . . . regime change.

Aung Su Kyi, the leader of Myanmar, has been accused of “legitimizing genocide” against the country’s Rohingya Muslims, despite being a Nobel Prize laureate. Her country’s military has massacred thousands of Rohingya, leading some to call for Kyi’s Nobel Prize to be revoked.