DNA DAY 2010: What, me worry about my DNA?

Of course, everyone asks me what I think about National DNA Day, to which I usually reply, “Every day is DNA Day at the DNA Learning Center.”

DNA is business as usual for me and legions of genetic researchers and counselors, but its also becoming business as usual for a lot of average people who are interested in their health or genealogy.

People also often ask me how I feel about all the personal DNA data that is becoming available. To which I usually reply, “I’d be a lot more concerned about losing a credit card or my social security number than having someone look at my DNA.”

An amazing amount of personal DNA information is becoming affordable to the interested person willing to provide a saliva sample by mail. With the tag line “genetics just got personal,” the company called 23 and Me will provide a sophisticated scan of DNA extracted from saliva for less than $500. The company uses research-grade methods to scan more than 600,000 DNA variations to provide risk information about 150 diseases and health-related traits – as well as genetic ancestry. Several other companies will do a similar analysis at a competitive price. So far, only several tens of thousands of people have actually taken these companies up on their offer of a (relatively) cheap gene scan, messing up their business plans.

It may be that people are holding out to get the whole ball of wax. DNA sequencing is becoming so inexpensive – forget the gene scan – it is becoming trivial to determine a person’s entire DNA code, or genome. To date, whole genome sequences have been published for only about 20 humans, but the 1,000 Genomes Project will increase that number 50-fold. We are only a year or two away from the day when an entire human genome sequence can be generated a cost of $1,000 – the price of a middling refrigerator.

Ethicists, who tend to be people who worry a lot, have done a lot of worrying about the consequences of such genetic knowledge. On a personal level, will a gene scan take on the aspect of genetic tarot, predicting the future course of our lives? What will it be like when we have a precise catalog of all the good, bad, and middling genes—and the wherewithal to determine who has which? In the face of such knowledge, will society continue to acquiesce to those who prefer to let nature take its course or will we gravitate toward a prescribed definition of the “right” genetic stuff? Heavy stuff for sure if you or your family is facing a life-threatening disease or if you think hard about the sort of genetically stratified world envisioned in Brave New World, GATTACA, or The Island.

These scenarios aside, the truth is that, for most people, all this DNA data may be more banal than anyone could ever have imagined. (What, no ethical dilemma?) The original human genome sequence was a composite from several anonymous individuals, for which an extensive informed consent protocol had been followed. However, on becoming the first known individual to have his entire genome sequenced, Nobel Laureate James D. Watson promptly released it all online – with the exception of the ApoE gene that estimates his risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Watson’s sequence has been available for public examination since 2007, with no ill effect to him.

About 400 letters of my genetic code has been in an anonymous online database for several years now, and it hasn’t caused me any grief either. We have the same DNA sequences from about 50,000 students stored in the same anonymous database, and they haven’t caused any alarm. At least I haven’t gotten a single phone call from an irate parent in the 10 years since we started putting the sequences online.

That doesn’t mean we should be cavalier about what we do with our personal health information, including certain DNA data. But I think we’re pretty well covered by the Genetic Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, which prohibits insurance companies or employers from using personal genetic information against us. Besides, there’s just so much DNA data becoming available, no one has time to look at it all – any more than anyone has enough time to keep up with their emails. There’s just too much stuff in cyberspace.

So, I’m not being flippant when I say that I’m not very worried about the proliferation of DNA data. It’s only that there are plenty of other types of data that are more readily available and can hurt us more directly.

This entry was posted by Susan Lauter on April 29, 2010 at 10:10 am, and is filed under Eugenics Archive. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

For a very long time I have been using Diabetes as an example of a disorder that is caused by a mutation in the insulin gene. This mutation would stop the cells from making insulin, and a diabetic might need daily insulin injections to regulate their sugar levels properly. I don’t know what took me…

After asking students during a lesson on mutations if it is possible that a mutation in DNA could be good, most students will nod yes without much understanding. Recently, I finally had one student raise his hand immediately and answer the question (with extreme surprise that no other students were blurting out the answer)…”evolution!” He…

Gene therapy is a technique that offers the potential to replace defective copies of genes in any genetic disease with an intact version. While the idea of this treatment sounds alluring, the actual practice of it is a whole other story. There are a few drawbacks to this technique that must be considered, including the…

I asked a group of 5th graders the other day whether or not we can learn anything from studying other living things. For example, if we mutate or change the DNA of another organism, like fruit flies (D. melanogaster), can we learn anything about what can happen when human DNA changes? For this particular class,…

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a technique that allows scientists to screen embryos after fertilization through In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), to prevent the transmission of serious genetic diseases for couples who are at risk. It also can be used to screen the egg and sperm before fertilization occurs. Only unaffected embryos will be transferred to…

Having an addiction can be devastating, to those that have it and to those that are exposed to it. The addiction can be to a variety of different things such as alcohol, drugs, gambling, internet shopping, video games or even work. But what causes these addictions? Why do some people have the ability to enjoy…

The initial goal of the Human Genome Project was to find, map and sequence all of the genes within the human genome. Since the completion of the initial draft back in 2000, the White House predicted that this would lead to a new era of molecular medicine, bringing new ways to prevent, diagnose, treat and…

With the completion of the Neandertal genome by the team of Dr. Svante Paabo and a closer look at their proteins by Gregory Hannon’s team at CSHL, scientists reveal incredible similarities between Neandertals and humans. Neandertals, the extinct species of what are most likely our closest relatives, lived on earth at the same time as…

Eugenics aimed to eliminate undesirable traits. But how do you define “undesirable”? There is anecdotal evidence that the incidence of some disorders has decreased due to genetic testing (see “Testing Curbs Some Genetic Diseases,” by Marilyn Marchione). In and of itself, this is a good thing, but is this eugenics? It would be hard to…

“Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and claims more than 7 million lives each year according to the World Health Organization.” Cancer cells have mutations in their genes that render them unable to respond to signals that regulate cell division. These cells grow uncontrollably and can invade normal tissue in other locations of…