The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category

Year

Quartile

Archeology

2009

Q3

Archeology

2010

Q4

Archeology

2011

Q3

Archeology

2012

Q3

Archeology

2013

Q4

Archeology

2014

Q4

Archeology

2015

Q3

Archeology

2016

Q3

Archeology

2017

Q3

Archeology (arts and humanities)

2009

Q3

Archeology (arts and humanities)

2010

Q4

Archeology (arts and humanities)

2011

Q3

Archeology (arts and humanities)

2012

Q3

Archeology (arts and humanities)

2013

Q4

Archeology (arts and humanities)

2014

Q4

Archeology (arts and humanities)

2015

Q2

Archeology (arts and humanities)

2016

Q3

Archeology (arts and humanities)

2017

Q3

History

2009

Q3

History

2010

Q4

History

2011

Q3

History

2012

Q3

History

2013

Q4

History

2014

Q4

History

2015

Q2

History

2016

Q2

History

2017

Q3

Visual Arts and Performing Arts

2009

Q3

Visual Arts and Performing Arts

2010

Q3

Visual Arts and Performing Arts

2011

Q2

Visual Arts and Performing Arts

2012

Q2

Visual Arts and Performing Arts

2013

Q3

Visual Arts and Performing Arts

2014

Q3

Visual Arts and Performing Arts

2015

Q1

Visual Arts and Performing Arts

2016

Q2

Visual Arts and Performing Arts

2017

Q2

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from
It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Year

SJR

2009

0.103

2010

0.101

2011

0.111

2012

0.109

2013

0.101

2014

0.101

2015

0.148

2016

0.129

2017

0.112

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document

Year

Value

Cites / Doc. (4 years)

2008

0.000

Cites / Doc. (4 years)

2009

0.000

Cites / Doc. (4 years)

2010

0.067

Cites / Doc. (4 years)

2011

0.150

Cites / Doc. (4 years)

2012

0.156

Cites / Doc. (4 years)

2013

0.091

Cites / Doc. (4 years)

2014

0.147

Cites / Doc. (4 years)

2015

0.244

Cites / Doc. (4 years)

2016

0.302

Cites / Doc. (4 years)

2017

0.043

Cites / Doc. (3 years)

2008

0.000

Cites / Doc. (3 years)

2009

0.000

Cites / Doc. (3 years)

2010

0.067

Cites / Doc. (3 years)

2011

0.150

Cites / Doc. (3 years)

2012

0.208

Cites / Doc. (3 years)

2013

0.077

Cites / Doc. (3 years)

2014

0.138

Cites / Doc. (3 years)

2015

0.241

Cites / Doc. (3 years)

2016

0.382

Cites / Doc. (3 years)

2017

0.026

Cites / Doc. (2 years)

2008

0.000

Cites / Doc. (2 years)

2009

0.000

Cites / Doc. (2 years)

2010

0.067

Cites / Doc. (2 years)

2011

0.167

Cites / Doc. (2 years)

2012

0.235

Cites / Doc. (2 years)

2013

0.000

Cites / Doc. (2 years)

2014

0.059

Cites / Doc. (2 years)

2015

0.250

Cites / Doc. (2 years)

2016

0.192

Cites / Doc. (2 years)

2017

0.000

Total Cites

Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Cites

Year

Value

Self Cites

2008

0

Self Cites

2009

0

Self Cites

2010

0

Self Cites

2011

1

Self Cites

2012

2

Self Cites

2013

1

Self Cites

2014

2

Self Cites

2015

4

Self Cites

2016

7

Self Cites

2017

0

Total Cites

2008

0

Total Cites

2009

0

Total Cites

2010

1

Total Cites

2011

3

Total Cites

2012

5

Total Cites

2013

2

Total Cites

2014

4

Total Cites

2015

7

Total Cites

2016

13

Total Cites

2017

1

External Cites per Doc

Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years.
External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

Cites

Year

Value

External Cites per document

2008

0

External Cites per document

2009

0.000

External Cites per document

2010

0.067

External Cites per document

2011

0.100

External Cites per document

2012

0.125

External Cites per document

2013

0.038

External Cites per document

2014

0.069

External Cites per document

2015

0.103

External Cites per document

2016

0.176

External Cites per document

2017

0.026

Cites per document

2008

0.000

Cites per document

2009

0.000

Cites per document

2010

0.067

Cites per document

2011

0.150

Cites per document

2012

0.208

Cites per document

2013

0.077

Cites per document

2014

0.138

Cites per document

2015

0.241

Cites per document

2016

0.382

Cites per document

2017

0.026

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Year

International Collaboration

2008

0.00

2009

0.00

2010

0.00

2011

8.33

2012

0.00

2013

0.00

2014

16.67

2015

7.14

2016

0.00

2017

0

Citable documents

Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents

Year

Value

Non-citable documents

2008

0

Non-citable documents

2009

0

Non-citable documents

2010

0

Non-citable documents

2011

0

Non-citable documents

2012

0

Non-citable documents

2013

0

Non-citable documents

2014

0

Non-citable documents

2015

0

Non-citable documents

2016

0

Non-citable documents

2017

0

Citable documents

2008

0

Citable documents

2009

8

Citable documents

2010

15

Citable documents

2011

20

Citable documents

2012

24

Citable documents

2013

26

Citable documents

2014

29

Citable documents

2015

29

Citable documents

2016

34

Citable documents

2017

39

Cited documents

Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Documents

Year

Value

Uncited documents

2008

0

Uncited documents

2009

8

Uncited documents

2010

14

Uncited documents

2011

17

Uncited documents

2012

19

Uncited documents

2013

25

Uncited documents

2014

25

Uncited documents

2015

23

Uncited documents

2016

25

Uncited documents

2017

38

Cited documents

2008

0

Cited documents

2009

0

Cited documents

2010

1

Cited documents

2011

3

Cited documents

2012

5

Cited documents

2013

1

Cited documents

2014

4

Cited documents

2015

6

Cited documents

2016

9

Cited documents

2017

1

Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Loading comments...

Leave a comment

Name* Required

Email(will not be published)* Required

* Required

* Required

The users of Scimago Journal & Country Rank have the possibility to dialogue through comments linked to a specific journal. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved. For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor.