Thought-controlled classroom: orgy of the group

“In the middle of all the brain-research going on, from one end of the planet to the other, there is the assumption that the individual doesn’t really exist. He’s a fiction. There is only the motion of particles in the brain. Therefore, nothing is inviolate, nothing is protected. Make the brain do A, make it do B; it doesn’t matter. What matters is harmonizing these tiny particles, in order to build a collective consensus, in order to force a science of behavior.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Individual power. Your power.

It stands as the essence of what the founding documents of the American Republic are all about, once you scratch below the surface a millimeter or so.

Therefore, it stands to reason that colleges and universities would be teaching courses in INDIVIDUAL POWER.

As soon as I write that, though, we all fall down laughing, because we understand the absurdity of such a proposition. Can you imagine Harvard endowing a chair in Individual Power?

Students would tear down the building in which such courses were taught. They’ve been carefully instructed that the individual is the greatest living threat to the planet.

If you can’t see that as mind control, visit your local optometrist and get a prescription for glasses.

So we have this astonishing situation: the very basis of freedom has no reflection in the educational system.

You can say “individual” within certain limited contexts. You can say “power,” if you’re talking about nuclear plants, or if you’re accusing someone of a crime, but if you put “individual” and “power” together and attribute a positive quality to the combination, you’re way, way outside the consensus. You’re crazy.

In order to spot the deepest versions of educational brainwashing, YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOME STANDARD AGAINST WHICH YOU CAN COMPARE WHAT IS COMING DOWN THE PIPELINE INTO THE MINDS OF STUDENTS.

If you lack that standard, you miss most of the action.

If you lack that standard, you have already been worked over by the system.

Then you’ll see some Grade-A prime mind control. Everywhere. Because schools either don’t mention it, or they discredit it.

Back in the days when I was writing on assignment for newspapers and magazines, I pitched a story about individual power to an editor. I wanted to trace its history as an idea over the past ten years.

He looked at me for a few seconds. He looked at me as if I’d just dropped some cow flop on his desk. He knew I wasn’t kidding and I had something I could write and turn in to him, but that made it worse. He began to squirm in his chair.

He laughed nervously.

Then he stopped laughing

He said, “This isn’t what we do.”

He really meant: “If you want to get back in my good graces, you’ll go away and come back with a story we can print. You do that four or five times, and then MAYBE I’ll trust you again.”

For him, I was suddenly radioactive. I was dangerous.

It was one of those, “Jon, I thought I knew you. Obviously, I was mistaken.”

I had a similar experience with a high-school history teacher in California. We were having lunch in a cafe in Santa Monica, and I said, “You should teach a course in individual power. The positive aspects. No group stuff. Just the individual.”

He frowned a deep intellectual frown, as if I’d just opened my jacket and exposed a few sticks of dynamite strapped to my chest. As if he was thinking about which agency of the government to report me to.

He launched a lecture, the essence of which was I should consider seeing a mental-health professional.

Now, for the schizoid part. The movies. Television. Video games. Comics. Graphic novels. They are filled to the brim, they are overflowing with individual heroes who have considerable power. These entertainment businesses bank billions of dollars, because people want to immerse themselves in that universe where individual power is supreme. They want it badly.

But when it comes to “real” life, power stops at the front door and no one answers the bell.

Suddenly, the hero, the person with power is anathema. He’s left holding the bag. So he adjusts. He waits. He wonders. He settles for less, far less. He learns how the game is played. He stifles his hopes. He shrinks. He forgets. He develops “problems” and tries to solve them within an impossibly narrow context. He redefines success and victory down to meet limited expectations. He strives for the normal and the average. For his efforts, he receives tidbits, like a dog looking up at his master.

If that isn’t mind control, nothing is.

From another discipline, medicine, here is an illustration of power-reduction, standardized and uniform treatment of every individual, avoidance of the unique elements of each person, and a chilling approach to surveillance, all wrapped up in one package:

Several years ago, the Business Insider printed a story:

“DARPA is at it again. This time, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [the technical-research wing of the Pentagon] has announced plans to create nanochips for monitoring troops’ health on the battlefield.”

Those who criticize the plan point out that gradually accustoming people to the insertion of chips will eventually lead to the mass chipping of society.

Yes, true. But there is another op, too.

Further down in the Business Insider, we have this official explanation: “…the sensors [nanochips] are targeted at preventing illness and disease, the two causes of most troops’ medical evacuation.”

Did you catch that? Apparently, the implanted nanochips are going to relay soldiers’ physical symptoms back to base in real time.

Now we are talking about something quite ominous: the capacity to use chips to relay hard data to authorities, who can then make off-the-shelf diagnoses of particular illnesses.

The troops are a test run. The actual op, up the line a few years, is to outfit private citizens with those nanochips, so medical analysts (or their computers) can present patients with rapid-fire and peremptory diagnoses, leading to drug treatments. (Recent press reports indicate computerized medical care is, in fact, gaining ground.)

Should I draw a picture? A person is walking down the street on his way to work, with his nanochip(s) in his arm. The tiny computer is silently running, recording metabolic changes. Suddenly, it pings. The man on the street doesn’t hear that sound from his arm, but a computer located in a facility ten miles (or 6000 miles) away does.

The data from the chip are flagged and shunted to another automatic processor which, depending on the severity of the diagnosis, electronically issues an appointment slip to the walking patient. For the clinic.

He receives a nudge from his cell phone, reads the appointment info, and confirms.

He will see a doctor, he will be handed a diagnosis, and he will take a drug. He’s in the system.

Eventually, the doctor in most cases won’t be necessary. The electronic message will spell out the diagnosis, direct the patient to the nearest pharmacy, where the prescription will be filled.

Of course, the fact that the diagnosis may be shortsighted or completely off-base is irrelevant. It’s ironclad: symptoms A,B,C, and D add up to diagnosis X, which means take drug Y. End of story.

Toxic effects from the drug? Never discussed. Irrelevant.

The published studies reporting the clinical trials of the drug were altered, on behalf of the drug company? The drug was actually ineffective and grossly dangerous? Who cares? It’s in the book. It’s official.

Welcome to tomorrow.

For those of you who want to probe a little deeper (and you should want to), here is a brief example of something that can go terribly wrong in this chipped version of healthcare. I spell it out at great length in my book, AIDS INC.

Antibody tests. These are widely used assays to determine what disease a person may have contracted. When the test reads positive, the patient is said to have the disease for which the antibody test is custom-designed. And from that flows the diagnosis and drug treatment.

Why? Because, starting in the early 1980s, something astonishing happened to antibody tests. The analysis of their results was turned upside down. Before then, the presence of antibodies to a particular germ was generally taken as a good sign. It meant the immune system had reacted well and forcefully to the germ-intrusion. But with the new interpretation, a positive test was taken to be a bad sign. The patient was at risk. In fact, he might already be ill.

So there you are with a nanochip in your arm, and you’re sitting in your backyard with your family, and the chip, every so often, is running routine antibody scans through access to your blood indicators.

Ping. At four in the afternoon, it suddenly develops that you have Hepatitis. You receive an appointment slip on your cell phone.

BUT you have no disease. Not even close. You’re actually suffering from a piece of medical-research insanity that has turned antibody tests on their heads.

However, there is no court of first or last resort. You’re going to the doctor, and he’s going to give you a powerful and toxic drug, and you’re going to take it. If you don’t, your chip will report the non-compliance to authorities.

You may doubt that computers and nanochips can carry out far-reaching analyses of various body indicators. Direct analysis isn’t necessary. In the same way that computer models built on a foundation of sand can assert manmade warming will destroy the planet in five years, medical models based on all sorts of indirect and abstract computations can deliver instant assessments of “physical aberrations from the norm.”

Again, welcome to tomorrow. Welcome to one-size-fits-all. Welcome to the diminishment of individual differences.

Yes, it sounds like science fiction. Now. But many technologies we presently have sounded like science fiction 50 years ago.

Once we enter a world where the individual no longer has credibility, a world where “greatest good for the greatest number” is the overriding principle, and where that principle is defined by the elite few, the term “mind control” will have a positive connotation. It will be accepted as the obvious strategy for achieving “peace in our time.”

At a job interview, a candidate will say, “Yes, I received my PhD in Mind Control at Yale, and then I did three years of post-doc work in Cooperative Learning Studies at MIT. My PhD thesis? It was titled, ‘Coordination Strategies in the Classroom for Eliminating the Concept of the Individual.’”

“Students must work in groups to complete tasks collectively toward academic goals. Unlike individual learning, which can be competitive in nature, students learning cooperatively can capitalize on one another’s resources and skills…Furthermore, the teacher’s role changes from giving information to facilitating students’ learning. Everyone succeeds when the group succeeds.” (Wikipedia, “Cooperative Learning”)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

Post navigation

15 comments on “Thought-controlled classroom: orgy of the group”

Great Article. Something that has been on my mind the last couple years. Our daughter has some complex health issues (which now I realize are likely toxin based) and for years we went Dr. to Dr.

From straight out denial to insane reasons (she has nephrotic protein because she needs to poo more- no joke) we have been frustrated beyond belief. I began reading medical articles a few years ago, hoping to find answers.

Every time I read one that conflicted with what the Drs. have told us I was convinced I must not be reading the article correctly, after all I did not go to medical school. I thought I had to be wrong, that what I had thought I had read was wrong — because clearly the Dr. did not get the same information from the same article. I wasn’t a Dr, right?

After a couple years I finally started to have some confidence that I was capable of understanding what I was reading. I realize I had been taught to not trust myself. That I needed to defer to those with greater “attainment” then I. It was a real eye opener for me to realize that I had been taught not to think… and I was witnessing it in myself first hand.

I have a 22 year old severely autistic stepson and his mother tells me of all of the horrors she went through with getting him help in the early years. Stick to your own intuition regarding your child and let the “educated doctors” rot in hell where they belong. He was at the beginning of the autistic trends we are seeing today, and there were very limited insights as to how to handle “challenged” children at that time. A mother always knows best. The doctors are “educated” on how to read the medical texts in the same way that priests are “educated” in how to read the Bible- and we “plebes” are not to attempt to tread on their territory.

You paint a none too pretty picture of where we are headed, but alas, you are 100% correct. If we do not learn the value and power of the individual, and the correct method of analytical critical thought processing (the Trivium), then we loose and the picture you paint becomes reality. Keep up the great work of trying to wake the masses. We can only hope that many more wake up and stop this insanity.

Right now, it seems as the vast majority is really insane and will go along with whatever mind control, physical controls, and mental manipulations those insane people at the top are quickly putting into place, and they will cheerfully accept the shackles on their ankles (accept the chip) and will show up at the doctor’s appointments that their cell phone dictates.

I believe that your are right and eventually even the doctor will be eliminated and they will be directed to the nearest pHARMacy (see the HARM?) and cheerfully take whatever poison they are directed to by their cell phone and chip.

i have seen “Harmaceutical” used and “allopathic medicine” used, and, most recently “Rockefeller pharmaceutical (allophathic) medicine” used (which it true,… the Rockefellers were a key funder of this new type of “reductionist” medical model).

Note: This type of medicine (Rockefeller medicine) IS good for somethings.. like removing a “gun shot wound from your leg (for example)”,… but NOT for “chronic disease caused by toxins and lack of trace minerals” in the body.

AND THEN THEY FULLY FUNDED IT TO TURN IT INTO A FULL BLOWN MONOPOLY! DAMN PSYCHOPATHS AND THE WEAK QUISLING AND/OR IGNORANT LAW MAKERS OF THE YEAR 1912!!!!

I know so many people that are on more than 10 pills a day and who take their vaccine flue shot every year. You can not tell them that this is harming their health. They firmly believe that it’s the main reason why they are still alive. Don’t insist or bring them solid verified information… they will avoid you in the future.

What can you do against such powerful brainwashing? Not much.

It is so sad. Nature had everything we ever needed to stay healthy.
Big Pharma knows that and this is why they are polluting our water, food and air.

What are we left with? Organic foods? But not for very long, the winds will blow their toxic chemicals all over the world.

Water distillers or water filtration units? When will they confiscate these tools? When will you be put on a terrorist list if you own one of these?

We are fighting giants here. Too bad we slept too long and didn’t notice of their wrong doing. It would have been much easier to stop them at the very beginning.

One thing that I have learned by studying the Trivium, is to learn the definitions and etymology of the words we use to define a basis for critical thought. This is basic Grammar and the first step of the Trivium. Lets look at that word “government.” It is a compound Latin based word- “govern” means to control; and “mente” meaning mind (“mentis” = singular and “mente” = plural) so “government means what it says- “control the mass mind.” In Old English that ending “e” was used but this was dropped in the New World. When I use the word “government” I mentally put the “e” on the end and keep the exact context in mind. This is an exercise everyone should do, and it reinforces the fact that I do not need anyone to “control” my mind- for I am in full control of it on my own- thank you very much!

The problem is inaction and the tendency to blame balanced by an incessant chorus of “toothless” protesters. It is no wonder that “vested interests” and no valour ALWAYS win the day.

Notes for my unpublished “A Brief History of Human Consciousness” cover our formative years (psychologist say is age 5-7, though I differ and start the process at around age 2). At this time we are broken by our parents and other peers. Given the discrepancy between what we “want” and what we “are allowed”, we learn to break the truth code to avoid punishment. Our options are outright lies or deflection (blame).

I was lucky and actually had no idea at the time, of the luck I had. I attended a public high school that had a specific program in place that actually encouraged critical, analytical thinking. I remember the teachers encouraging us to go and find information about all sorts of things and told us where and how to begin looking. Frankly nothing was off limits, we were encouraged to explore the world and understand it from the classroom and beyond through all kinds of field trips. I thought everyone had this experience but in talking to kids at other high schools I learned they did not. Later just before I graduated I asked and was I told by a teacher that we were the first year of a special program that would last no more than 5 years. He further stated that unique programs are often limited to as little as 5 or no more than 10 years. I found that strange because if a program works one would think you would stick with it. The program was very much about the individual and educating for oneself to make their way in a large and interesting world.

Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is a natural reaction for a child or teen (especially an intelligent and/or talented child or teen) to what Jon is talking about here – that he/she, through education, has been “carefully instructed that the individual is the greatest living threat to the planet”.

Most disturbing to me, from an educational standpoint, are the following facts as I have experience or understanding as they exist: 1) Phonics as the basis for learning language has been done away with in favor of visual-spatial (perhaps pre-“matrix”) programmatic “whole language”/picture, or, icon-clicking un-learning, 2) Cursive handwriting is no longer taught to children in primary school {ENTER Microsoft, HP, etc., . . . }, (3) Not only are chalkboards and black boards no longer utilized, but the white board/marker (pardone moi, I meant to say, “EXPO”) incremental step to “digitized plantations” (quoting Dale Carson, former federal law enforcement officer and son of a judge turned constitutional lawyer in Florida) has been replaced with computers, 4) the oxymoronic and highly problematic, as a lover of the written Word, “E- . . . Books”?????, 5) the generation only one year younger than I does not know that ZZ Top and Peter Frampton are musicians, 6) DRAMATIC PAUSE HERE FOR SHELL SHOCK AND A NERVOUS TIC “LEARNING” . . . WITHOUT BOOKS WITH REAL PAGES TO HOLD, TOUCH, AND WITH WHICH TO TRULY INTERACT WITH, AND THUS, TO INTERNALIZE THE MESSAGE THROUGH THE WORD (NOTICE I DID NOT WRITE “TEXT” IN PLACE OF “WORD” ????????) AND LIFE IN THE SURREAL WORLD JUST KEEPS GETTING MORE UNREAL.

THE LIONESS WHO WATCHES THE HAWK, WHO WATCHES “THE MONGOOSE” WHO WATCHES THE “BROOD OF VIPERS” IN THE FAMILY COURTS AND THOSE INITIATED “COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDERS”–JULIAN’S REAL MUMMY (DEDICATED TO THE REAL MOMMIES AND DADDIES OF THE REAL AMERICA, TO THEIR CHILDREN WHO WANT TO COME HOME, AND ESPECIALLY TO MY LITTLE JEWEL, MOST PRECIOUS, JULIAN JACOB WORRELL OF GENEALOGY SALOOM OF WHOM I HAVE, AS HAS HE, BEEN DEPRIVED OF ALL MEANINGFUL CONTACT WITH ONE ANOTHER SINCE MAY 08, 2012). VERITATEM DILEXI–THROUGH TRUTH, KNOWLEDGE! “TAKE HEART AND HAVE COURAGE” (THE HOLY BIBLE, REPEATED THROUGHOUT, ALL REAL VERSIONS).

I always thought I was in control of my own mind. After all, if you don’t have control over your own actions or brain, then what do you have? Learning the truth is a true shock and not a lot of people are ready for it.