Until recently, the Eritrean Air Force had a single luxury airplane, an 1970s-era American corporate turboprop. Thanks to a brazen act of defiance, the plane is now in Saudi Arabia. And its pilots, two high-ranking Air Force officers, are attempting to defect from a government that few people seem to want to live under -- even, apparently, among the upper-echelons of its military.

Isaias Afewerki, the country's longtime dictator and the architect of one of
the most oppressive states on earth, might have to fly commercial the next time
he has to negotiate with his rivals in neighboring Ethiopia, or to convince
foreign leaders that his government isn't aiding al Shabaab, the al Qeada
franchise that once ruled much of Somalia.

On October 2,
the pilots, who belong to an
air force with only 350 personnel (down from 850 in 2002, according to the
International Institute for Security Studies), flew the plane to Saudi Arabia, where they were met with an F-15
escort before landing outside Jizan. Within the week, an Eritrean
delegation, which -- according to both translated Arabic media sources and Meron Estefanos, a prominent Eritrean exile activist and journalist -- included pilots and a Major General
in the Eritrean military, landed in Jeddah and attempted to get their plane and
pilots back -- unsuccessfully, it would turn out, as the the Saudis have already refused
to relinquish the asylum seekers. Their defection is a
hard-to-ignore demonstration of how deeply dysfunctional and unpopular Afewerki's
regime has become. "These are people considered loyal by
the regime and they have planned this and executed it right under the noses of
their commanders," Estefanos told me. "Eritreans never used to say anything against
their government, even only a few years ago."

This incident could also tank the Afewerki
regime's already suffering reputation in the international community. This is a
particularly inconvenient time for two high-level officers to make off with the
presidential plane. In June, the UN's Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea found that
Afewerki's government was violating an
arms embargo on Somalia by "maintaining relations with known
arms dealers in Somalia," and through "its support for Ethiopian armed
opposition groups passing through Somali territory." But the report added that
there was no evidence to suggest that his government was still supporting al
Shabaab, the primary rationale behind UN sanctions that have been in place
since 2009. Even if Afewerki is still facilitating arms flows to groups
fighting the Ethiopian government -- the Afewerki regime's bitterest geopolitical
enemy -- he is now confident enough in his country's possible rehabilitation
to argue
that the UN should drop its sanctions regime. (The chances of success are
minimal: Over the summer, the U.S. actually tightened its sanctions
on Eritrean officials linked to al Shabaab.)

It
is entirely possible that two Air Force officers -- pilots who had
flown Afewerki on several occasions, according to Saleh Gadi, a dissident
journalist and founder of Awate.com -- would know
something of the country's continued meddling in Somalia, including the scope
of its support for al Shabaab. Somalia, which sits at the mouth of the Red Sea
and has been a haven for pirates and militant Islamists, is an area of intense
focus and cooperation for the international community. The pilots have dramatically
exposed a government that Freedom House included on its 2012 list of the "Worst
of the Worst" states in terms of political oppression. And they've created a possible crisis for
their now-former bosses.

Even
so, the pilots probably didn't defect because they want to rat out Afewerki's
regime, but because Eritrea is not an easy place to live, even for people towards
the top of the state structure. Gadi is hardly surprised that two
high-ranking pilots would take any opportunity to defect -- even if it meant
commandeering the presidential
airplane. "In general, everybody who gets the chance will escape," he says. "The
elite of the regime ... are used to a lavish lifestyle they cannot maintain
anymore. Even the officers are suffering." The pilots aren't the year's only
high-profile Eritrean defectors: In August, the flag-carrier for the Eritrean team
defected
during the Summer Olympics in London.

Estefanos echoes
Gadi in saying that escape is a popular notion among Eritreans. "Any Eritrean will use any opportunity he gets to flee," she says. It is not hard to see
why. According to Human Rights Watch, Afewerki has imprisoned
somewhere between 5,000 and 10,000 of his opponents and perceived opponents,
including "government officials, business leaders [and] journalists." The government
heavily fines the families of those who evade military service, which perhaps
explains why a badly
impoverished country of less than 6 million is able to maintain a standing
military of over 201,000, in addition to over 120,000 reservists. Estefanos likened
Afewerki's government to the Kim regime in North Korea, which is less of a
stretch than it might seem. Both countries made it into Freedom House's Worst
of the Worst report in 2012, along
with such elite company as Sudan, Syria, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Equatorial
Guinea -- and Saudi Arabia.

An absolute monarchy
with tight political controls and laws that forbid its female population from
driving, Saudi Arabia seems like a counter-intuitive place for two would-be political
asylees to flee. The notion of Saudi Arabia serving as a beacon of freedom for
anyone became all the more absurd in March of 2011, when the Saudi government contributed
troops to the Gulf States' mission to pacify
the anti-regime uprising in Bahrain. Accepting political refugees even comes
with a potentially-dangerous layer of irony for the Saudi monarchy: in sheltering
politically-sensitive asylum seekers like the Eritrean pilots, Saudi Arabia would
only create a precedent for other countries to shelter their own dissidents,
while tacitly endorsing attempts to undermine the region's most oppressive
governments.

Yet in this case, self-interest
outweighs any of the more abstract reasons for Saudi Arabia's presumed-hostility
toward political asylees. According to Frederic Wehry of the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace, Saudi Arabia is concerned about blowback from the conflicts in the
Horn of Africa that Afewerki has helped stoke. For instance, Saudi Arabia has a
tense relationship with neighboring Yemen, a chronically unstable country that
is home to 250,000 Somali
refugees -- as well as al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). "This is a
major security threat right at their back door," says Wehry. "They see al Shabaab
as a potential feeder for AQAP." Wehry also notes that Saudi Arabia supported UN
sanctions against Eritrea.

So as improbable as it seems that Saudi Arabia would remain a haven for two very public escapees from one of the world's most tyrannical states, it's likely that the pilots aren't going anywhere. Afewerki, meanwhile, will probably get his plane back, but he'll want to think about how to keep more pilots from stealing it in the future.

About the Author

Most Popular

Writing used to be a solitary profession. How did it become so interminably social?

Whether we’re behind the podium or awaiting our turn, numbing our bottoms on the chill of metal foldout chairs or trying to work some life into our terror-stricken tongues, we introverts feel the pain of the public performance. This is because there are requirements to being a writer. Other than being a writer, I mean. Firstly, there’s the need to become part of the writing “community”, which compels every writer who craves self respect and success to attend community events, help to organize them, buzz over them, and—despite blitzed nerves and staggering bowels—present and perform at them. We get through it. We bully ourselves into it. We dose ourselves with beta blockers. We drink. We become our own worst enemies for a night of validation and participation.

Even when a dentist kills an adored lion, and everyone is furious, there’s loftier righteousness to be had.

Now is the point in the story of Cecil the lion—amid non-stop news coverage and passionate social-media advocacy—when people get tired of hearing about Cecil the lion. Even if they hesitate to say it.

But Cecil fatigue is only going to get worse. On Friday morning, Zimbabwe’s environment minister, Oppah Muchinguri, called for the extradition of the man who killed him, the Minnesota dentist Walter Palmer. Muchinguri would like Palmer to be “held accountable for his illegal action”—paying a reported $50,000 to kill Cecil with an arrow after luring him away from protected land. And she’s far from alone in demanding accountability. This week, the Internet has served as a bastion of judgment and vigilante justice—just like usual, except that this was a perfect storm directed at a single person. It might be called an outrage singularity.

Forget credit hours—in a quest to cut costs, universities are simply asking students to prove their mastery of a subject.

MANCHESTER, Mich.—Had Daniella Kippnick followed in the footsteps of the hundreds of millions of students who have earned university degrees in the past millennium, she might be slumping in a lecture hall somewhere while a professor droned. But Kippnick has no course lectures. She has no courses to attend at all. No classroom, no college quad, no grades. Her university has no deadlines or tenure-track professors.

Instead, Kippnick makes her way through different subject matters on the way to a bachelor’s in accounting. When she feels she’s mastered a certain subject, she takes a test at home, where a proctor watches her from afar by monitoring her computer and watching her over a video feed. If she proves she’s competent—by getting the equivalent of a B—she passes and moves on to the next subject.

There’s no way this man could be president, right? Just look at him: rumpled and scowling, bald pate topped by an entropic nimbus of white hair. Just listen to him: ranting, in his gravelly Brooklyn accent, about socialism. Socialism!

And yet here we are: In the biggest surprise of the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, this thoroughly implausible man, Bernie Sanders, is a sensation.

He is drawing enormous crowds—11,000 in Phoenix, 8,000 in Dallas, 2,500 in Council Bluffs, Iowa—the largest turnout of any candidate from any party in the first-to-vote primary state. He has raised $15 million in mostly small donations, to Hillary Clinton’s $45 million—and unlike her, he did it without holding a single fundraiser. Shocking the political establishment, it is Sanders—not Martin O’Malley, the fresh-faced former two-term governor of Maryland; not Joe Biden, the sitting vice president—to whom discontented Democratic voters looking for an alternative to Clinton have turned.

The Islamic State is no mere collection of psychopaths. It is a religious group with carefully considered beliefs, among them that it is a key agent of the coming apocalypse. Here’s what that means for its strategy—and for how to stop it.

What is the Islamic State?

Where did it come from, and what are its intentions? The simplicity of these questions can be deceiving, and few Western leaders seem to know the answers. In December, The New York Times published confidential comments by Major General Michael K. Nagata, the Special Operations commander for the United States in the Middle East, admitting that he had hardly begun figuring out the Islamic State’s appeal. “We have not defeated the idea,” he said. “We do not even understand the idea.” In the past year, President Obama has referred to the Islamic State, variously, as “not Islamic” and as al-Qaeda’s “jayvee team,” statements that reflected confusion about the group, and may have contributed to significant strategic errors.

During the multi-country press tour for Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation, not even Jon Stewart has dared ask Tom Cruise about Scientology.

During the media blitz for Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation over the past two weeks, Tom Cruise has seemingly been everywhere. In London, he participated in a live interview at the British Film Institute with the presenter Alex Zane, the movie’s director, Christopher McQuarrie, and a handful of his fellow cast members. In New York, he faced off with Jimmy Fallon in a lip-sync battle on The Tonight Show and attended the Monday night premiere in Times Square. And, on Tuesday afternoon, the actor recorded an appearance on The Daily Show With Jon Stewart, where he discussed his exercise regimen, the importance of a healthy diet, and how he still has all his own hair at 53.

Stewart, who during his career has won two Peabody Awards for public service and the Orwell Award for “distinguished contribution to honesty and clarity in public language,” represented the most challenging interviewer Cruise has faced on the tour, during a challenging year for the actor. In April, HBO broadcast Alex Gibney’s documentary Going Clear, a film based on the book of the same title by Lawrence Wright exploring the Church of Scientology, of which Cruise is a high-profile member. The movie alleges, among other things, that the actor personally profited from slave labor (church members who were paid 40 cents an hour to outfit the star’s airplane hangar and motorcycle), and that his former girlfriend, the actress Nazanin Boniadi, was punished by the Church by being forced to do menial work after telling a friend about her relationship troubles with Cruise. For Cruise “not to address the allegations of abuse,” Gibney said in January, “seems to me palpably irresponsible.” But in The Daily Show interview, as with all of Cruise’s other appearances, Scientology wasn’t mentioned.

The new version of Apple’s signature media software is a mess. What are people with large MP3 libraries to do?

When the developer Erik Kemp designed the first metadata system for MP3s in 1996, he provided only three options for attaching text to the music. Every audio file could be labeled with only an artist, song name, and album title.

Kemp’s system has since been augmented and improved upon, but never replaced. Which makes sense: Like the web itself, his schema was shipped, good enough,and an improvement on the vacuum which preceded it. Those three big tags, as they’re called, work well with pop and rock written between 1960 and 1995. This didn’t prevent rampant mislabeling in the early days of the web, though, as anyone who remembers Napster can tell you. His system stumbles even more, though, when it needs to capture hip hop’s tradition of guest MCs or jazz’s vibrant culture of studio musicianship.

Some say the so-called sharing economy has gotten away from its central premise—sharing.

This past March, in an up-and-coming neighborhood of Portland, Maine, a group of residents rented a warehouse and opened a tool-lending library. The idea was to give locals access to everyday but expensive garage, kitchen, and landscaping tools—such as chainsaws, lawnmowers, wheelbarrows, a giant cider press, and soap molds—to save unnecessary expense as well as clutter in closets and tool sheds.

The residents had been inspired by similar tool-lending libraries across the country—in Columbus, Ohio; in Seattle, Washington; in Portland, Oregon. The ethos made sense to the Mainers. “We all have day jobs working to make a more sustainable world,” says Hazel Onsrud, one of the Maine Tool Library’s founders, who works in renewable energy. “I do not want to buy all of that stuff.”

A leading neuroscientist who has spent decades studying creativity shares her research on where genius comes from, whether it is dependent on high IQ—and why it is so often accompanied by mental illness.

As a psychiatrist and neuroscientist who studies creativity, I’ve had the pleasure of working with many gifted and high-profile subjects over the years, but Kurt Vonnegut—dear, funny, eccentric, lovable, tormented Kurt Vonnegut—will always be one of my favorites. Kurt was a faculty member at the Iowa Writers’ Workshop in the 1960s, and participated in the first big study I did as a member of the university’s psychiatry department. I was examining the anecdotal link between creativity and mental illness, and Kurt was an excellent case study.

He was intermittently depressed, but that was only the beginning. His mother had suffered from depression and committed suicide on Mother’s Day, when Kurt was 21 and home on military leave during World War II. His son, Mark, was originally diagnosed with schizophrenia but may actually have bipolar disorder. (Mark, who is a practicing physician, recounts his experiences in two books, The Eden Express and Just Like Someone Without Mental Illness Only More So, in which he reveals that many family members struggled with psychiatric problems. “My mother, my cousins, and my sisters weren’t doing so great,” he writes. “We had eating disorders, co-dependency, outstanding warrants, drug and alcohol problems, dating and employment problems, and other ‘issues.’ ”)

An attack on an American-funded military group epitomizes the Obama Administration’s logistical and strategic failures in the war-torn country.

Last week, the U.S. finally received some good news in Syria:.After months of prevarication, Turkey announced that the American military could launch airstrikes against Islamic State positions in Syria from its base in Incirlik. The development signaled that Turkey, a regional power, had at last agreed to join the fight against ISIS.

The announcement provided a dose of optimism in a conflict that has, in the last four years, killed over 200,000 and displaced millions more. Days later, however, the positive momentum screeched to a halt. Earlier this week, fighters from the al-Nusra Front, an Islamist group aligned with al-Qaeda, reportedly captured the commander of Division 30, a Syrian militia that receives U.S. funding and logistical support, in the countryside north of Aleppo. On Friday, the offensive escalated: Al-Nusra fighters attacked Division 30 headquarters, killing five and capturing others. According to Agence France Presse, the purpose of the attack was to obtain sophisticated weapons provided by the Americans.