Facts speak louder than statistics

Thursday, 28 January 2016

Mal Turnbull, his UN backed friends and the
Red Bandana Man are yet again advocating an Australian Republic. However,
before the republic pro-politicians should even think about an Australian
republic, they need to get on with the job of running the country - running the
country well on behalf of the people - and bringing our debt back into line.

The budget must be in the black before we
consider any idea that is costly to the taxpayer and the Australian public generally.
The last thing we need is politicians wasting their time, and our money, on
something that is completely unnecessary in the overall scheme. Should our
United Nations controlled puppet politicians decide they wish to proceed with
this unnecessary expense, they must firstly ask the people.

They must first establish a referendum, again
at great cost to the taxpayer. And, again, they must get the debt fixed before
they should consider spending on such waste. Given Australian voters are fed up
with 'career politicians' and changes to Prime Ministers as they feel fit, the
decline in representation of the people in our governments today, and their deliberate
fiscal mismanagement, it is more than likely that a referendum for a Republic
may just win the "Yes" vote. People are screaming for change -
particularly change of politicians doing as they please and being unanswerable
to those they represent.

We need change, but how do we do it? Our vote
has meant nothing for some many years now, nor has our voting worked by way of
changing government in 2013 and then another change of Prime Minister in 2015.
We continue to be dealt a blow with politicians who care not for the Australian
public.

Politicians are very good at fooling the
general public. People call them "fools", but we, the people, are the
fools. Change to our political scene is absolutely necessary. We, the people,
are the only ones that can do it. With the right Constitution, or alterations
to our existing Constitution, and the right way forward, we can do it.

It's time for a change, the right change
though. It must be change that serves the Australian people, not the
politicians and other parasites leeching off the Australian people and
particularly, the Australian taxpayers.

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

One thing people need
to ask in relation to this latest push for a republic is will there be a bill
of rights? If there is no bill of rights then the proposal is not even worth
considering. The current constitution implies certain rights such as freedom of
political speech because when it was written certain things were taken for
granted as just being part of people’s lives at the time and also enshrined as part
of the British Magna Carta. If something was mentioned there it didn’t
need to be mentioned again anywhere else. Any new constitution will not be
guided by such historical documents, if something isn’t specifically mentioned
then it’s simply not there to be considered or implied.

In other words we
would find ourselves completely at the mercy of unscrupulous politicians who
already have some restrictions on free speech in place and even wanted to take
it a step further with laws that said if you simply offend someone you’re committing
a crime. The proposed laws would have encouraged silence because it’s arbitrary
in its application since what offends some will not offend others except the
left who are offended by anything that doesn’t agree with their treacherous
philosophy.

So if a vote for a
republic does come up the message we will need to get out there is that people
should vote with their heads, not their hearts because all the gushing over so
called good points of ‘our own head of state’ and ‘being independent’ (which we
were until the UN got their claws into us!) are worthless if we find ourselves
in a position where we cannot speak freely and will have to obey without
question.

And to all those who
believe it can’t happen here guess again, it can. There is no special magic
that’s been keeping us free, no kind of real mechanism that controls
politicians and stops them going too far, if people would look closely they’d
realise the system is slanted in their favour. The reality is once we give up
any rights we will be hard pressed to get them back.If we are to become a
republic let’s get it right from the beginning and not vote in something that
will take years and a major uphill battle to fix. A republic is not worth
losing anything for, it’s not worth one single sacrifice whatsoever.

Monday, 25 January 2016

New South Wales Premier Michael Baird is jumping on the ‘drop our
borders’ bandwagon so let’s look at some of his dialogue.

Baird warned of the dangers of what he called
anti-immigration politics in Australia and around the world.”

Baird is speaking out against patriotism. Last thing any
politician wants is national pride and people thinking for themselves.

He said the country owed much of its success to migrants,
and he feared what would happen if refugees were turned away.

We owe them you hear me, we owe them! We must pay them all
back! Drop the borders and more success will come our way! Notice he’s using
‘migrant’ and ‘refugee’ interchangeably?

"We are one of the most successful and multicultural
nations in the world".

Yep, mostly because the pre-multicultural and general
Western values are still the ones in place, that’s changing though as we all
know so wave bye bye to success.

"But I believe we are potentially at risk of losing
what makes Australia the best place in the world to live, because some want to
shut our doors and avert their eyes."

If we drop our borders we will lose what makes Australia one
of the best places in the world to live. What will happen is they will open our
doors then avert their eyes to the vile cultures and terrorism they bring in.

Baird spoke of Deng Thiak Adut, a former child soldier in
Sudan who is now a refugee lawyer in Australia. “"Because we welcomed
Deng, we sheltered him, we gave him clothes, food and a chance to learn, and he
seized that opportunity, and now he is working in his community giving back to
those who, like him, once had no voice."

Where Baird says ‘we’ he means the taxpayers funded it
whether they liked it or not and the politicians will take the credit for it.
And if Deng is a refugee lawyer how is he giving back to Australia? Wouldn’t
being a legal aid lawyer for Australian citizens be more of an act of giving
back to Australia? Still, well done Deng, becoming a lawyer is an achievement.
Many refugees just end up on welfare.

The Premier said Australia owed a large part of its
character to the success of people like Mr Adut.

We owe them! (Again!). Actually Mike, Australia was covered
with success and character a long time ago and because of the people born here
and the immigrants who came here legally.

"And to our kindness, compassion in sharing our luck
and giving them a chance," he said.

We just happen to be lucky, nothing to do with having a
superior way of life that allows people opportunities and a chance at success,
no it’s all luck only that just happened because some magical elves sprinkled
their magic dust here and not in the third world holes that many want to leave.

"Deng is what happens when generosity meets
opportunity".

His success is an example of what can happen, doesn’t always
work out that way though.

The Premier said Australia must face threats and arm its
security forces to protect the borders appropriately.

Baird wants to drop our borders though so we can’t take him
seriously there.

"To shut our doors to refugees, as many here and around
the world are calling for, is to deny our history, to deny our character".

More spin there. Most aren’t talking of shutting our doors
but the reality is we can’t just drop our borders and let everyone in just to give
certain groups their warm fuzzy feelings.

"In a quest for personal comfort let us not sacrifice
who we are above all, which is welcoming, compassionate and inclusive."

Let us not sacrifice our country and ourselves on the altar
of multiculturalism with its false promise of a warm fuzzy world just because someone wants some votes or for any other reason. We’re seeing
what’s happening to Europe with large numbers of so called refugees and the
acts of terrorism and rape that are occurring. Astonishingly many are still not getting the message that the problem is not where people live but how they
live.

And we aren't immune, the same things have happened here on a smaller scale,
trouble is when you try and bring everything into the open for an open and
honest discussion the left automatically cry ‘racist’. They have to stifle
discussion. But before anyone wants to mindlessly squawk ‘racist’, just
remember race and culture are separate things.

Baird should just stick to being the premier of NSW and leave immigration to people who know about such things. NSW has
been trashed by the Liberals and he’s not exactly distinguishing himself in
fixing it so we don’t really need his input on this matter, especially
when it’s nothing but an exercise in sucking up for votes.

Nothing in what Baird says obliges us to drop our borders
and with terrorism on the increase around the world we’d be fools to do so. It’s
a very real threat and no amount of starry eyed pro open borders rhetoric is
going to change that.

Friday, 8 January 2016

While there are those who criticise the aspects of sharia law that treats women as fifth rate there are others who embrace aspects of it and play blame the victim. ‘She shouldn’t have been drinking’, ‘she shouldn’t have gone where she did’, ‘she shouldn’t have dressed like she did’, ‘she shouldn’t have gone there alone’, she shouldn’t have been out alone at night’ etc. is what we sometimes hear when a woman is attacked. In other words she’s to blame, her attacker was not obliged to have any self-control and can do whatever he wants. The fact is though no one has the right to attack anyone, that’s an illegal act and that’s where the condemnation should be directed, not at someone who was engaged in lawful activities regardless of how foolish they may seem to be. Leave the culture of victim blaming to the dregs of the third world and keep it out of the free world. To blame the victim is to stand on the same side of the attacker and their criminal actions.

About This Page

Welcome to World Central, an independent page presenting straightforward news, views and attitudes. Looking for what's right as opposed to just looking right and presenting the facts, not the fantasy and certainly not the ideology. This page is not designed to offend, the intent is to find the facts and present them to the world.The opinions expressed here are the editor’s and do not represent any other persons, company, organisation etc. The opinions posted in the comments section are the opinion of the person posting them.