the nature of women is they need to be dominated , doesnt matter how dominate they are its all about finding a more dominate male case of Aileen Wuornos was she couldnt find a man dominate enough and so adopted the 'male' role herself , she wasnt strictly lesbian and shes one of the few cases of a woman being able to shot someone in the face....

trouble is that they can still use it against you when they get upset or pissed off.

They can as you say "use it against you". This is still no excuse to hit a woman over a playstation. Its not about dominating the female partner, as physical force is never the answer. But hey, that vacuum is looking very unused....

thing with this video is it appears that the recording was for his benefit , like he needed proof or something... big mistake. therefore i go back to my earlier comment and say he would have been better off walking out. it was clearly upsetting his children and that never looks good. the place to 'dominate women is in the bedroom.... hit the bitches plenty there , they love it

on the one hand... this guy sucks... on the other its not like she can beat him up. shes all of like 105lbs your kids are there and her hits probably do no damage. now if she was bigger than you then you can fight her like a man outside.

I'm sorry, but if a woman wants to hit me for any stupid fucking reason then I have every right to hit her back... Just because she is weaker doesn't mean that she should be able to attack me and not expect a retaliation.

only douchebags say that bullshit. morph is right on, shes 5" nothing and 98 lbs. should she have done it? no, but still, he has a right as a Man not to hit her back. would you hit a 6 year old in the same instance?

im not saying if a woman hits me i wont hit her back but you also have to put it in perspective.. if she hits me and it does nothing to me then maybe ill just shake her basically use the same force she used on you. it makes sense if her hits dont hurt then hit her back on that same level atleast. or just hold her down you can lay on that little woman and she wouldnt be able to move. no need to punch her in the face. unless she kicked me in the balls then its on like donkey kong

i agree she is way too tiny to have really done damage to him. i dont think he needed to use that kind of force on her. now if i hit a guy i would expect to get hit back as if i were a guy. also why the fuck was she defending a god damn tv... just let him take it and leave. it is only a fucking tv.

there are probably more issues here then whats shown. I'm sure he did something pretty fucked for her to just kick him out, especially since they have two kids. And the kind of guy that punches a woman in retaliation is probably not a decent guy.

Okay, say she didn't vacuum good enough, or the dishes weren't clean enough and he decided to smack her around, FUCK THAT, same goes for women, Just because his penis is unsatisfying and small that is no reason to smack him. But, in this situation, she's asking for it, she should at least expect to get pummeled-

lol, don't get me wrong I don't think she deserved to get hit. But if someone's hitting you, your knee-jerk reaction is to hit back. Giving someone some right to not have violence directed towards them despite their own violent behaviour is nonsensical.

Well facts are she hit him, he hit back. Other side of that he got in her face. I but you NEVER throw at someone you can't take one back from. In medieval times to settle it "in court" they would have the guy sit in a hole up to his waist and he could get a club or whip-like thing and she would get a bag with a rock in it and they would dook it out that way. The guy would try and drag her into the hole or hit her while she came at him till she quit, and the girl would try and nock the guy out. Wouldn't that be way more entertaining then a court case? I put my money on this guy pulling her in, he has a good hook. Looks like she was never hit b4 she didn't take it well at all.