This movie is sort of like X-Men: Apocalypse. Sure you can take it apart from all the plot holes, but you can't deny that it's just a damn fun film and that's what superhero movies should strive to be.

"Up until the climax where everything becomes a clusterfuck, this is something that plagues Spider-Man 3 throughout its overlong runtime. It just keeps going in a tedious and repetitive formula. A cohesive narrative is nonexistent here. Sony made Sam & Ivan Raimi and Alvin Sargent cram all of this ****, which could easily cover at least three more sequels, into the script, and it really shows."

"Up until the climax where everything becomes a clusterfuck, this is something that plagues Spider-Man 3 throughout its overlong runtime. It just keeps going in a tedious and repetitive formula. A cohesive narrative is nonexistent here. Sony made Sam & Ivan Raimi and Alvin Sargent cram all of this ****, which could easily cover at least three more sequels, into the script, and it really shows."

What do you feel is wrong with it? I don't see any grammar errors or misspelled words.

"Up until the climax where everything becomes a clusterfuck, this is something that plagues Spider-Man 3 throughout its overlong runtime. It just keeps going in a tedious and repetitive formula. A cohesive narrative is nonexistent here. Sony made Sam & Ivan Raimi and Alvin Sargent cram all of this ****, which could easily cover at least three more sequels, into the script, and it really shows."

What do you feel is wrong with it? I don't see any grammar errors or misspelled words.

How can you fault a film for being too long while simultaneously complaining that the material in said movie could be used to make 3 more films?

"Up until the climax where everything becomes a clusterfuck, this is something that plagues Spider-Man 3 throughout its overlong runtime. It just keeps going in a tedious and repetitive formula. A cohesive narrative is nonexistent here. Sony made Sam & Ivan Raimi and Alvin Sargent cram all of this ****, which could easily cover at least three more sequels, into the script, and it really shows."

What do you feel is wrong with it? I don't see any grammar errors or misspelled words.

How can you fault a film for being too long while simultaneously complaining that the material in said movie could be used to make 3 more films?

"Up until the climax where everything becomes a clusterfuck, this is something that plagues Spider-Man 3 throughout its overlong runtime. It just keeps going in a tedious and repetitive formula. A cohesive narrative is nonexistent here. Sony made Sam & Ivan Raimi and Alvin Sargent cram all of this ****, which could easily cover at least three more sequels, into the script, and it really shows."

What do you feel is wrong with it? I don't see any grammar errors or misspelled words.

How can you fault a film for being too long while simultaneously complaining that the material in said movie could be used to make 3 more films?