The syntax is $(MAKE).
Sorry I missed this. And I still see no discussion of removing the module,
perhaps you have a pointer to the archives? And what error were you seeing?
All for supporting VisualStudio 2005, but this isn't the end of the headaches.
Bill
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> I'm not near my windows box, and the universal inability of any search
> engine to allow me to search for the literal string "$MAKE" is geting to
> me.
>
> Does anyone know exactly which is correct;
>
> "$MAKE"
> or
> "($MAKE)"
>
> I can reverse engineer the answer tomorrow, but it's still annoying me
> now. It looks to me, and some others, like the latter would evaluate to
> "(NMAKE)" and yet when I made the change it got rid of the syntax error,
> and it looked like a compile with /nologo. Is nmake syntax really that
> broken?
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:37:06PM -0000, colm@apache.org wrote:
>
>>Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win
>>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win?rev=349713&r1=349712&r2=349713&view=diff
>>==============================================================================
>>--- httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win (original)
>>+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win Tue Nov 29 04:37:03 2005
>>@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
>>
>> !IFNDEF MAKEOPT
>> # Only default the behavior if MAKEOPT= is omitted
>>-!IF "$(MAKE)" == "NMAKE"
>>+!IF "($MAKE)" == "NMAKE"
>> # Microsoft NMake options
>> MAKEOPT=-nologo
>> !ELSEIF "($MAKE)" == "make"
>>