By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our
Cookie Policy unless you have disabled them. You can change your Cookie Settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Can a motley crew of countries grouping climate champions Germany and France with oil giants Russia and Saudi Arabia muster a joint defence of the Paris Agreement against Donald Trump?

This is the question for observers as the G20 group of major economies gathers in Hamburg amid a storm of geopolitical crises threatening to push climate change down the agenda.

Since Trump announced last month he would pull the United States out of the 196-nation pact, fellow G20 members including India, China, France, Canada, Italy and bloc president Germany, have reaffirmed their commitment to its climate-rescue ambitions.

This will be the first opportunity, however, for the 19 to voice a collective condemnation.

"At this summit what the Germans and the rest of us want is basically to isolate the US so that the US doesn't contaminate any other countries," said Mohamed Adow of Christian Aid, an expert observer of the two-decade negotiation that culminated in the Paris Agreement in 2015.

In May, before Trump made his announcement, the other six in the G7 group of rich nations reaffirmed support for the hard-fought global pact.

The G20 includes the G7 as well as developing nations such as China, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, South Korea, and Indonesia.

It also counts as members the world's biggest oil producers -- Russia and Saudi Arabia -- and major emitters of planet-warming greenhouse gases, like India, which required much arm-twisting to greenlight the agreement in the first place.

Russia and Turkey have signed the agreement but not ratified it. Saudi Arabia, which was one of the last countries to hold out, has both signed and ratified.

Climate champions among the bloc's developing country members need to be vocal supporters of Germany's bid to emerge from the summit on Saturday with strong language on climate, observers say.

If not, "you could easily end up with Trump feeling that he can weaken the G20 outcome and... Build connections with these other countries," said Adow.

According to Alden Meyer of the Union of Concerned Scientists, there are "rumblings that Saudi Arabia has been pushing back on some elements of the text", possibly in "coordination" with Washington.

But the geopolitical turmoil surrounding the meeting may turn out to be a blessing in disguise.

Saudi Arabia and Russia, respectively involved in the crises in Qatar and Syria, may not wish to pick a new fight -- on climate -- at this point, observers say.

The summit is meant to come up with a closing "communique" that includes elements on climate change.

Countries have also been negotiating the text of an "action plan" on climate and energy.

The question is what the final text will look like.

Will 19 countries speak with one voice on climate? Or will they splinter, with some aligning themselves with the US?

Will accommodations be made to America that there is a joint 20-member statement but with watered-down climate language?

Whatever the outcome, observers say G20 summits are not the place for direction-changing decisions.

They are more a gauge of mood and a barometer of thinking on issues such as putting a price on carbon pollution, or ending fossil fuel subsidies.

Having said that, it "would be a concern if you saw some watering down of past language," in the G20 statement, Meyer added.

"Certainly anything that gave a signal that 'clean coal' is acceptable would not be good."

This is a term for technology that allows continued coal use by lessening its polluting effects. Critics say the focus should be on a wholesale move to non-polluting energy sources like the Sun and wind.

The G20 represents about 85 percent of global GDP and 80 percent of energy-related CO2 emissions.