Babies’ gut bacteria affected by delivery method

Babies born via caesarean have more bacteria that are acquired in hospitals and are more likely to have antimicrobial resistance

Research has shown babies born vaginally have different gut bacteria (microbiome) than those delivered by caesarean.

Scientists from the Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hudson Institute of Medical Research (Melbourne), the University of Birmingham and their collaborators discovered that vaginally born babies got most of their gut bacteria from their mother, whereas babies born via caesarean had more bacteria associated with hospital environments in their guts.

The exact role of the baby’s gut bacteria is unclear and it isn’t known if these differences at birth will have any effect on later health.

The researchers found the differences in gut bacteria between vaginally born and caesarean delivered babies largely evened out by the time the baby reached one year old, but large follow-up studies are needed to determine if the early differences influence health outcomes.

Published in Nature, this largest ever study of neonatal microbiomes also revealed that the microbiome of vaginally delivered newborns did not come from the mother’s vaginal bacteria, but from the mother’s gut.

The gut microbiome is a complex ecosystem of millions of microbes, and is thought to be important for the development of the immune system. Lack of exposure to the right microbes in early childhood has been implicated in autoimmune diseases such as asthma, allergies and diabetes.

However, it is not fully understood how important the initial gut microbiome is to the baby’s immune system development and health, how a baby’s microbiome develops, or what happens to it with different modes of birth.

To understand more about the development of the microbiome, and if the delivery method affected this, researchers studied 1679 samples of gut bacteria from nearly 600 healthy babies and 175 mothers. The babies, aged four, seven or 21 days old had all been born in UK hospitals by vaginal delivery or caesarean, and some were also followed up later, up to one year of age.

Using DNA sequencing and genomics analysis, the researchers could see which bacteria were present and found there was a significant difference between the two delivery methods. They discovered that vaginally delivered babies had many more helpful (commensal) bacteria from their mothers than babies who were born by caesarean.

Dr Samuel Forster Hudson Institute’s Microbiota and Systems Biology Research Group Head, said: “Method of birth plays a major role in determining our microbiome; however, more research is essential to understand how this contributes to our lifelong health.

Dr Sam Forster

“If we understand the impact of this early bacterial exposure, it may help us to find out if developing bacterial therapeutics with helpful bacteria could result in positive outcomes for population health,” he said.

Dr Trevor Lawley, a senior author on the paper from the Wellcome Sanger Institute, said: “This is the largest genomic investigation of newborn babies’ microbiomes to date. We discovered that the mode of delivery had a great impact on the gut bacteria of newborn babies, with transmission of bacteria from mother to baby occurring during vaginal birth. Further understanding of which species of bacteria help create a healthy baby microbiome could enable us to create bacterial therapies.”

Previous limited studies had suggested that vaginal bacteria were swallowed by the baby on its way down the birth canal. However, this large-scale study found babies had very few of their mother’s vaginal bacteria in their guts, with no difference between babies born vaginally or by caesarean.

During birth, the baby will come into contact with bacteria from the mother’s faeces. The study discovered it was the mother’s gut bacteria that made up much of the microbiome in the vaginally delivered babies. Babies born via caesarean had many fewer of these bacteria. This study therefore found no evidence to support risky controversial ‘vaginal swabbing’ practices, which could transfer dangerous bacteria to the baby.

In place of some of the mother’s bacteria, the babies born via caesarean had more bacteria that are typically acquired in hospitals, and were more likely to have antimicrobial resistance.

The researchers isolated, grew and sequenced the genomes of more than 800 of these potentially pathogenic bacteria, confirming that they were the same as strains causing bloodstream infections in UK hospitals. Although these bacteria don’t usually cause disease while in the gut, they can cause infections if they get into the wrong place or if the immune system fails.

Dr Nigel Field, a senior author on the paper from UCL, said: “Our study showed that as the babies grow and take in bacteria from milk and everything around them, their gut microbiomes become more similar to each other. After they have been weaned, the microbiome differences between babies born via caesarean and delivered vaginally have mainly evened out. We don’t yet know whether the initial differences we found will have any health implications.”

Dr Alison Wright, Consultant Obstetrician and Vice President of The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said: “In many cases, a caesarean is a life-saving procedure, and can be the right choice for a woman and her baby. The exact role of the microbiome in the newborn and what factors can change it are still uncertain, so we don’t think this study should deter women from having a caesarean. This study shows that more research is required to improve our understanding of this important area.”

All women who have had a caesarean are now offered antibiotics before the delivery to help prevent the mother developing a wound infection, meaning that the baby also receives a dose of antibiotics via the placenta. This could also cause some of the microbiome differences seen between the two birth methods.

Principal Investigator of the Baby Biome Study, Professor Peter Brocklehurst, of the University of Birmingham, said: “The first weeks of life are a critical window of development of the baby’s immune system, but we know very little about it. We urgently need to follow up this study, looking at these babies as they grow to see if early differences in the microbiome lead to any health issues. Further studies will help us understand the role of gut bacteria in early life and could help us develop therapeutics to create a healthy microbiome.”

Well, unlike many news organisations, we have no sponsors, no corporate or ideological interests. We don't put up a paywall – we believe in free access to information of public interest. Media ownership in Australia is one of the most concentrated in the world (Learn more). Since the trend of consolidation is and has historically been upward, fewer and fewer individuals or organizations control increasing shares of the mass media in our country. According to independent assessment, about 98% of the media sector is held by three conglomerates. This tendency is not only totally unacceptable, but also to a degree frightening). Learn more hereWe endeavour to provide the community with real-time access to true unfiltered news firsthand from primary sources.
It is a bumpy road with all sorties of difficulties. We can only achieve this goal together. Our website is open to any citizen journalists and organizations who want to contribute, publish high-quality insights or send media releases to improve public access to impartial information. You and we have the right to know, learn, read, hear what and how we deem appropriate.Your support is greatly appreciated. All donations are kept completely private and confidential.Thank you in advance!

Mirage News . All timestamps on this site are AEST/AEDT and all times in the articles are local times unless indicated otherwise.

All trademarks and rights are owned by their respective owners. All content is used for news reporting purposes.
For news reporting purposes, we rely on fair use (fair dealing) [1] [2]for textual and media content to keep the public informed on the developments. If you are a person mentioned in the story or you are a copyright holder and believe that any content should be removed, revised or taken down, please contact us. View the disclaimer page here