President Donald Trump answers questions from the press as he leaves the White House on Nov. 17, 2018, en route to see fire damage in California. On Monday, he took to social media to walk back comments a day earlier that seemed to blame military commanders for taking too long to capture Osama bin Laden. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump took to social media on Monday to defend his earlier comments that the military should have killed Osama bin Laden sooner than it did, reframing the issue as an attack on former President Bill Clinton.

On Sunday, during a Fox News interview, Trump responded to criticism from retired Adm. William McRaven — who oversaw the special operations raid that killed bin Laden in 2011 — by dismissing him as a “Hillary Clinton fan” and adding that “wouldn’t it have been nice if we got Osama bin Laden a lot sooner than that?”

When pressed as to whether he was denigrating McRaven’s service, Trump said that “everybody in Pakistan knew (bin Laden) was there” and said he took the step of ending foreign aid to that country when he came into office.

The president had some choice words in response to a retired Navy SEAL’s criticism during an interview on “Fox News Sunday.”

By: J.D. Simkins

The comments drew more criticism for the commander in chief. Senate Armed Services Committee ranking member Jack Reed, D-R.I., said they show that Trump “continues to ignore basic facts and demonstrate a lack of knowledge about our military and national security.”

“When the final operation which killed bin Laden took place, it was a great victory for our country,” he added. “Admiral McRaven was one of many brave leaders who took risks and contributed to the mission’s success.”

Roughly 24 hours after the interview aired, Trump wrote on Twitter that “Of course we should have captured Osama Bin Laden long before we did. I pointed him out in my book just BEFORE the attack on the World Trade Center. President Clinton famously missed his shot.”

....We no longer pay Pakistan the $Billions because they would take our money and do nothing for us, Bin Laden being a prime example, Afghanistan being another. They were just one of many countries that take from the United States without giving anything in return. That’s ENDING!

Fear of missing out?

Sign up for the Early Bird Brief - a daily roundup of military and defense news stories from around the globe.

Thanks for signing up.

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the Early Bird Brief.

He added that his administration was ending the practice of giving billions in international assistance to countries who “do nothing for us.”

McRaven has criticized Trump multiple times in the past, including in August, when he wrote an op-ed following Trump’s decision to revoke the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan. McRaven said it would be an honor to have his clearance revoked too, “so I can add my name to the list of men and women who have spoken up against your presidency.”

A new Military Times poll shows that troops today are evenly split in their views about President Trump.

By: Leo Shane III

After Sunday’s interview, McRaven told CNN that he did not back Hillary Clinton or anyone else in the 2016 election.

“I am a fan of President Obama and President George W. Bush, both of whom I worked for,” he said in a statement. “I admire all presidents, regardless of their political party, who uphold the dignity of the office and who use that office to bring the nation together in challenging times."

Trump’s Sunday comments struck a nerve with Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan, who also used Twitter to criticize the American president.

Record needs to be put straight on Mr Trump's tirade against Pakistan: 1. No Pakistani was involved in 9/11 but Pak decided to participate in US War on Terror. 2. Pakistan suffered 75,000 casualties in this war & over $123 bn was lost to economy. US "aid" was a miniscule $20 bn.

"Instead of making Pakistan a scapegoat for their failures, the US should do a serious assessment of why, despite 140,000 NATO troops plus 250,000 Afghan troops & reportedly $1 trillion spent on war in Afghanistan, the Taliban today are stronger than before,” he wrote in a series of tweets Monday morning.

You May Also Like

Leo covers Congress, Veterans Affairs and the White House for Military Times. He has covered Washington, D.C. since 2004, focusing on military personnel and veterans policies. His work has earned numerous honors, including a 2009 Polk award, a 2010 National Headliner Award, the IAVA Leadership in Journalism award and the VFW News Media award.