Reason for Serving: I would like to be a liason between GPUS and GRP on issues with an international scope, and help to contribute my knowledge and perspective on such issues. I also currently reside in Switzerland, having moved here from MA in 2013.

Qualifications: Since about 2010 I have become more and more drawn to deepening my understanding of global issues, their geopolitical, historical, and financial underpinnings, the agenda and mechanisms of control by the global elites, and possible ways to advance the interests of the masses. I have been researching relentlessly on many aspects of these and other global issues for the past 7 years. I currently reside in Switzerland, having moved here from MA in 2013, so I also have a more international social environment. I have also met in person with some of the global Greens in Paris, during the 2015 Paris climate conference, while I assisted Dr. Jill Stein with her activities and interactions with global Green leaders there.

Short Biography:

Born and educated through university (Fudan University, Shanghai) in China, I went to graduate school in the biology program in Georgetown University briefly, then completed my Ph.D. in the genetics program in University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1997. I worked for Millennium Pharmaceuticals (later bought by Takeda) in Cambridge, MA as a computational biologist for 5 years.

After taking time off to raise a child, I became very concerned about the threat of climate change, did extensive reading into the scientific literature in climate science and related disciplines, and started my activism with the non-profit organization that was founded by Jill Stein and John Andrews, Massachusetts Coalition for Healthy Communities. Later they introduced me to the GRP, and I became a statecom member. I soon realized that the obstacle to any meaningful action on climate change resides entirely in the political system, which only allowed false "climate solutions" to be even discussed. I became part of a small group of highly motivated grassroots activists based in the US and Canada, calling our group "Climate SOS". I went to the climate conference in Copenhagen in 2009 representing these two organizations, and participated in the people's mobilization and discussions space there. From there I became part of the international climate justice network called "Climate Justice Now!", and have been contributing my knowledge through that network.

Starting in 2010 I became more and more involved with the antiwar movement, and gave a number of presentations/workshops at antiwar conferences on topics of climate and war, in MA, New England area, and internationally via web link. I lead a Climate SOS initiative to bring a petition from many hundreds of organizations around the world to the Cancun climate conference (COP16) in 2010, asking delegates from all member states to bring the issue of war, militarism and imperialism into the climate negotiations, as the issues are inevitably linked. But the more I researched into these topics, the more I realized there're far deeper layers to be recognized, so I continued to dig deeper. This is why I feel I could contribute meaningfully to the International Committee.

Reason for Serving: After canvassing for the DNC since kindergarten, managing a DNC legislative campaign, and attending the 2016 DNC National Convention in Philadelphia, I Demexited once and for all. The Green Party has always been what I identified with most politically, but like many Americans, I didn’t think it viable enough not to be stuck in the corporate plutocracy. After watching the surge of support for my friend Bernie Sanders, I now think it’s possible for progressive candidates to take office and make our country what it should be. I’d like to assist in that effort.

Qualifications: Perfect CAT and SAT scores at age 12 with Johns Hopkins University Search for Gifted and Talented Youth. 99th percentile Stanford Binet IQ score. Lifelong student government member. Attended Wells College on full academic scholarship. Held management positions with five companies. Read the law in Vermont under an Attorney whose legislative campaign I managed. Founder of Women’s Crisis Center weekly support groups at BUHS. Moot court and debate team. Literary awards for excellence in journalism from Linda Ellerbee. Two published anthologies of short stories. Marketing consultant for various think tanks and companies with a wide array of products and ideas. Graduate student at Harvard Extension. ABCD leadership training certificate holder. Founder of two companies. CEO of Contemporary Conservatory Company. Enthusiastic team builder and persuasive advocate.

Short Biography: I grew up in a small town of 12,000 people in Vermont. From a very early age I was politically active in my community and with the DNC. After testing into gifted programs and winning an academic scholarship for news writing, I attended Wells College, Cornell’s sister school. During my time at Wells I accepted a teaching position at Bapagrama Education Center in Bangalore, India. After living with no electricity or running water for a year teaching at the free anti-caste school for Untouchable children, I realized how vitally important activism is in the world. I studied for the bar exam in Vermont after graduation hoping to make the world a better place legally, and was inspired to seek legislative office for the Attorney I worked for from a retiring legislator. After a successful campaign, I was recruited by a national think tank to work as an advertising creative. I designed national campaigns and saved every penny for grad school. On my 30th birthday, a lifelong dream came true when I enrolled at Harvard University, and wrote my tuition check in full from years of hard work. I continue my studies here around my consulting career. I am additionally CEO of Contemporary Conservatory Company, and run a small petcare business because I love animals.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

3. Request from John Andrews for Appointment to Presidential Campaign Support Committee

17 March 2017

Dear State Committee,

At the April 2 StateCom meeting, I would like to request that the State Committee approve my joining the GPUS Presidential Campaign Support Committee (PCSC).

As you may recall, I was a member of the PCSC until late 2015 when I resigned to avoid the possible conflict of interest resulting from my holding a position in the Jill Stein campaign. I remained as an observer. Now that I am no longer associated with any campaign, I am able to rejoin the PCSC. I feel that my experience in both the 2012 and 2016 presidential races gives me background that can be very valuable to that committee. I will also be able to keep the GRP well-informed about things within the PCSC sphere of interest, such as candidate recruitment, the nomination process, presidential debates, etc.

The GRP is allowed to have as many PCSC members as it has delegates to the National Committee. Thus we could appoint as many as 4 people. Generally the membership of the PCSC has not been more than about 14 people, which means that most states do not appoint anyone. This year is rather a quite time for the PCSC, but as 2020 approaches, it will become more active and every member it can recruit will be needed.

The attachment below is taken from the Procedures of the PCSC.

Thank you.

- John Andrews

- - - - - - - - - - -

ATTACHMENT

Text Excerpted from the Procedures of the Presidential Campaign Support Committee:

. . . The voting membership of the committee shall consist of Green Party members from the various state parties and caucuses who have been approved to serve by their state party or caucus. Each state party and caucus may have as many voting members on the committee as they have delegates to the National Committee, or may have as many as three voting members on the committee, whichever number is greater. Each member is entitled to one vote (as opposed to only one vote per state/caucus). . . .

Darlene welcomed StateCom members to the meeting. She noted that she is still learning about GRP and appreciates everyone’s support. Darlene provided an overview of Jill Stein campaign. She attended the NY briefing on Stein campaign and was appointed national co-chair. She expressed her vision for state party and about a new direction to move forward. Darlene attended the Women’s March in DC which she described as inspirational to have so many people come together.

Darlene noted that it is time to come together and build as a Party. We are only Party that takes a stance on social justice and the environment. There isn’t any clear action with other political parties. These are tenuous times. The question is how do we come together to be effective and align with other social groups. We face challenges – lack of resources to build capacity within the party. We need to go throughout Massachusetts and expose GRP to attract people to take action in the state and national front. Our task is to build our numbers in the party, recruit and be activists.

Four things are optimal: fundraising to pay staff, political organizer/party director, a fundraiser director, and communications person with staff person. We need to implement succession planning for treasurer. Increasing party donations is our number one project. The Green Party has been noted on the national level, it is time to hire staff on national level and a political organizer. There is a surplus of $200K in the national account for outreach. As a committee, we need to prioritize what StateCom will do to identify and bring a fundraiser and a communications person on board. As money comes in we can hire a staff person. We hired Jamie who was dedicated to building the Party with $5,000 from the Stein campaign. Fundraising can help with recruiting people from the Stein campaign. In order to build an infrastructure, it will take money to rent venues and provide food. Differentiate what is going on with the party and bring people in and provide outlet for their ideas. It takes a Green Party training course to interface with the Party. How we recruit and engage new people.

Jill elevated the party to higher degree, raised several million dollars. The recount effort raised even more funds. Successes such as gaining ballot across country, fundraising capacity, social-media vital and promoted the Stein campaign. The recount effort took the party to another level. There has been fragmentation between Jill and Green Party. Jill agreed to help with fundraising for GRP with letters for support. Our first priority is fundraising and outreach, build capacity, and be action oriented in the community. The next step is returning recount donations and request donations for the Green-Rainbow Party.

Darlene reported that she is an action oriented person. She was nominated to the GPUS International Committee yesterday. Her vision is to be out there. She noted that Thomas Peak was guest speaker at Pioneer Valley chapter meeting. Adam Friedman talked about Rank Choice Voting (RCV). Western MA brings manpower to the RCV effort. Rank choice voting is a collaborative effort.

Danny noted some members will leave the meeting early and we need quorum for the afternoon session. Four members plan to leave early. Roni verified nine members must be present for quorum. Minor adjustments were made to the agenda. Due to lack of quorum at the October 1, 2016 StateCom meeting, Charlene noted the minutes were notes. Strategy go-around and legislative proposal will be addressed before lunch break. Danny asked to present the Assabet chapter report before leaving at noon. There was a brief discussion about rearranging agenda for allow time for John’s presentation.

Set Date and Location for Spring 2017 StateCom Meeting:

Date: April 1 or 22, 2017

Location: Eastern part of the state - Ralph and Brian will search for a venue.

Co-facilitators: Nancy Slator & John Andrews

Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes:

July 17, 2016 and October 1, 2016 minutes approved by consensus.

Fundraiser Director Steps Down:

Ian reported an issue with appointing an inexperienced person to the fundraiser director position. He explained why complaints about remarks by the fundraiser were reported late to AdCom. Ian read the complaints to StateCom members. Ian noted that the fundraiser did not deny making remarks. Ian explained the problem with making a complaint as an officer is that he or she represents the Party. Charlene noted that it is critical to protect the Party, and that harassing remarks both internally and externally are unacceptable. John agreed that StateCom must take action because it is an ethical issue to use media for harassing remarks. The fundraiser director was elected by the convention. He was given an opportunity to step down. Charlene referred to bylaw 4.3 concerning membership and removing members. Adcom acted as a fact finding committee and followed the correct process in this case. Ian referred to bylaw 9.11 that states a vote of StateCom is required for recall. Ian suggested a request be made for a set of standards about communications and then build a structure we can live with.

Danny explained that AdCom could not make a permanent decision, and made a provisional decision. Steps were taken to remove the Fundraiser Director from all GRP list services and Facebook. Elie asked if the Fundraiser Director was invited to step down. Roni reported that an email and letter were sent to inform the Fundraiser Director of AdCom’s decision and his rights. Darlene reported that since notifying the Fundraiser Director, he has not taken steps to keep his position.

Charlene called for a vote on whether to remove the current fundraiser as Fundraising Director.

Vote to remove the Manny Pintado as Fundraising Director:

Vote

12 yes votes

0 no votes

0 opposed

Vote to remove the Fundraiser from StateCom:

Joyce recommended that the former Manny remain as a StateCom member. This item was tabled to be addressed later. Ian noted that chapter listservs are not managed by GRP. Local chapters need local autonomy. If there is a problem, contact AdCom. Closed session adjourned.

Danny Factor – Assabet River Valley report – the chapter is working on a project to promote Acton as a sanctuary city.

Diversity reps – no action

Appointing a member to GPUS – Darlene Elias was appointed to GPUS International Committee at the January 27, 2017 Special StateCom telecon.

Darlene Elias and David Gerry spoke with David Rolde regarding his concerns about not appointing Maggie Zhou to GPUS IC. Maggie does not meet the requirements to be a Green-Rainbow Party GPUS representative. Darlene reported that Maggie approached Bahram Zandi about being appointed provisionally until StateCom could vote her in. The National Committee has turned over the decision making process to StateCom. Charlene recommended tabling this item until StateCom members have more information to make an educated decision at the April meeting. Charlene asked if there were any concerns about tabling the approval process. John noted that Maggie asked StateCom to make a decision. Angel commented that there is an issue of residency in question. John noted that she would have to be a member of GRP, but we have experience with Maggie. She is not a member of GRP, but we can recommend she is an experienced representative. Darlene reported reading Maggie’s email. She is a MA voter, but she does not list a specific town in MA. She may vote Absentee. She may vote as a Swiss Green. Danny added that Maggie’s admits she does not reside in MA. Danny noted that he is in favor of change in the bylaw at another time. The current bylaw states that we should not approve her request. Danny added that he has a few concerns about some of her postings endorsing conspiracy theories. Danny supports tabling this item. He requested that bylaw amendments be referred to AdCom agenda.

Vote was called to table item to April.

John will stand aside.

Elie will stand aside. He noted that a large number of members to National would be eliminated with current bylaw.

There was a consensus to table Maggie’s appointment to GPUS IC until April StateCom meeting.

Officer Reports:

Ian will wait to present treasurer report under budget item.

Co-chair and secretary reports moved to afternoon session.

Strategy Discussion:

Danny noted that Darlene’s report was on target with current needs. A Planning Committee is needed to help AdCom with short and long terms status of party. He would support a proposal at April StateCom to create a Planning Committee. Darlene agreed that a Planning group is a good idea, but questioned who would do the work. We should start by looking at working groups as action groups with deliverables. Darlene noted that she often takes on projects herself. The question is, what can we do collectively to help with fundraising until someone has been appointed to the position of Fundraiser Director.

A recommendation was made to recruit someone to fill the Communications position and to make sure people who help use good judgment. Darlene noted that it takes a long time to send correspondence out. It takes 24 to 48 hours to email messages. John inquired about our capacity, public dialog to make progress with political power. We need working committees working on projects. In regard to Communications, we must use volunteers until position is filled. Ian noted that we have to decide what political structures we want to set up. A decision must be made if we want to play in the legislative process or build strength. Focus. If we had more Communication volunteers, we could devise a system that does not rely on Joyce, Brian, and Ian to do all the work. Angel suggested organizing come-meet-the-greens activities, make presentations, provide literature, and a video presentation to attract to new people for capacity building.

New stacker – Ian (Angel and Darlene left the meeting)

David Rolde arrived around 11:45 am

Charlene commented that good ideas were presented. She pointed out that it is important to remember that it is all about money and control. Attacks on women, Muslims and agencies that provide services are all a screen for massively collecting public dollars for private concerns. The Green-Rainbow Party runs candidates and is not controlled by “dark money” (reference to Jane Meyer’s book Dark Money).

David Rolde commented that he feels radical activism has left the party. It is difficult to raise an issue that progressive Democrats have not already addressed. We should be attracting marginalized people to the party. He is opposed to the Planning Committee idea, which will most likely languish.

Roger commented that he likes the idea of hiring a staff because answers will come quickly. It is a step in a positive direction. Our successes in marginalized communities are still uncertain. This should be an objective for GRP.

Nancy agrees that fundraising is a key component. Having a GRP serving on the state level is a good strategy.

Elie commented that if we do not rely on big money, we must rely on people to work on public issues. Our local structures are inferior to the Democratic Party. He wants the same rights he had before and he does not want a higher structure to report to. He wants to be open to others, attend meetings and participate. He commented that it is easy to talk and that it has to be easier to obtain information. We need 40 local chapters in the state with 20 people in each local chapter.

The current voting system does not take in to account the actual will of the people.

Adam Friedman worked with John Andrews in Stein campaign. Greg and Adam work together with RCV effort. Greg was a Nader supporter. More voices, more choices in the race. The system fails to guarantee majority winners. The current system discourages candidates from running for office. RCV means one trip to the voting booth. There is a series of runoffs in one election – three rounds. The first voting round are first choices. No first choices, these are eliminated right away. Voting is done on paper and ballots are scanned. There is a cost associated with upgrading voting machines, scan machines, some other additional costs, but it also can save money. IRV and RCV are top choices of voting systems. RCV has been enacted in Maine. Portland was the first city to use RCV. Maine has long history of governors winning with majority of votes.

Elie added that MA would be a problem because of established Democratic Party system. Fifty percent of winners do not get majority of the vote in MA. There are benefits to third parties that cover more issues, hold more debates, have more candidates, growth, etc. RCV can eliminate the primary race which is a cost savings.

Adam Friedman presented:

RCV eliminates friction between people running and focuses on issues. Democrats make up 80% of the statehouse representatives. RCV will show Democrats they are voting for weaker candidates. When a Green runs, Democrats are not threatened. Democrats can capture the GRP vote as 2nd or 3rd vote.

Charlene commented that RCV offers more choice, but there is no guarantee a Green would vote for a Democrat. John noted that a favorite candidate endorsed by political establishment discourages stronger candidates from running or to be endorsed.

Adam reported that the recent election and results created a dark cloud. There is a kickoff strategy movement with action teams. The list has grown with calls every day. The movement has grown to over 1k people. There were over 400 sign-ups at the Women’s march in Boston. Collect data on an issue and do a poll. Need data. The goal is to raise $30k. They have raised $10k so toward a professional poll. Represent Us is a new group seeking the next big campaign. (Represent Us is located in Florence, MA). They want to hire a campaign manager. There is potential growth with local campaigns. They want to promote IRC with GRP to form a partnership and do fundraising at same time.

Elie requested a form letter from RCI to send to politicians. Polling is first, then send an RFP to pollsters. Ian commented that we can decide before April 1 whether to support this movement. He asked that StateCom allow AdCom to call a Special meeting about RCI.

Urgent or Old Business:

StateCom was asked to formerly dismiss four StateCom members who have missed three or more consecutive quarterly meetings. Roni notified Pioneer Valley and Greater Boston Chapter in writing of member status, per bylaws 8.7.2; 8.7.3; and 8.8.4.

Result:

Rick Purcell and Dawn Bennett of Pioneer Valley chapter were removed by consensus vote. Both Rick and Dawn expressed no interest in serving on StateCom.

The remaining two Alternates will be contacted about their interest in serving on StateCom.

David Rolde will contact Arthur Conquest III and follow-up at April StateCom meeting.

Nancy Slator will contact Alan Alcombright and follow-up at April StateCom meeting.

Proposals:

Downgrade Active Working Committee

The proposal recommends changing the status of certain committees from working to adhoc. Action, fundraising/finance, platform, and technical committees will be called on for specific projects. Charlene asked for concerns. Brian asked for a straw poll vote to identify concerns. Elie objects because he did not read the proposal. He inquired about volunteers serving on committees. David Rolde inquired what it means that a working committee cannot report to StateCom. John supports the proposal to focus on active working committee. Active committees should have co-chairs, a note taker and membership.

David Rolde expressed concern that it is not right to amend that StateCom members must serve on two of the remaining committees. Other members should serve on committees in addition to StateCom members. Charlene explained that each StateCom member is required to serve or two current committees or serve on one working committee or one adhoc committee with assigned tasks. Elie noted that his main concern is that inclusion of new people who have little experience with the party are assigned tasks. There were no other changes to the bylaw. Refer to bylaw 10.1 for interpretation of an adhoc bylaw.

Amendment:

Charlene offered an amendment that StateCom members choose one working committee and be encouraged to join a second committee or an adhoc committee.

David Rolde objects to the amendment requiring StateCom members serve on a committee. Elie commented that focus should be to bring in new young people to the party.

Charlene asked if there were any concerns to proposal with amendment.

Vote for amendment

5 yes

4 opposed

The proposal will be tabled until April meeting for revisions. Bylaw 8.4 states that StateCom members will: Serve on either the Administrative Committee, the National Committee, or a Working Committee, unless running as a candidate or chairing a GRP chapter.

Ian withdrew his proposal because StateCom must be advised of recount effort from the Green Party perspective. David Rolde did not review proposals and Elie had a problem obtaining the proposals on GRP website. As an aside, Ian reported that his son, Frank is moving back to MA and plans to work on the Elections Action Working Group (EAWG).

Vote

Brian called for a straw poll vote to table action plan for 2018

Majority votes to table proposals to April 2017 meeting.

Budget:

Ian reported that the budget consists of two parts: Budget and Recount. He explained that Dr. Stein called the co-chairs and treasurer to raise funds for the recount effort. The fundraiser was an overwhelming success that included some large donations. One donation from a former chair of Goldman Sachs who declared self employed. This donation was quickly returned. On the Friday after Thanksgiving, the Stein campaign declared the recount fundraiser a great success and asked GRP to stop requesting donations. There is over $44K in the account. Dr. Stein requested that all remaining money be returned to donors. AdCom recommended GRP return money and this was an emergency situation and it is in the best interest of the party to return funds. Ian asked if there were any concerns with returning the money.

John suggested writing a letter to donors and request how money should be handled using Rank Choice Voting. Excess money could be used in other projects. Ian reported that Jill was emphatic that money be returned. David Rolde commented that Adcom overstepped its bounds by accepting money for the recount. David pointed out that many Green Party members did not approve of the recount.

Ian reported that the treasurer has right by law to accept or reject donations. He opened a bank account for recount donations. He reported that Detroit voting machines are held together by duct tape. There was a link from Jill’s website to GRP and Ohio sites. Donations up to $10k were accepted. The decision to accept donations had to be made urgently.

Charlene asked “whose money is it?” Ian responded that theoretically GRP could spend money. Ian explained that FEC rules state that money can only be used for a federal election. The recount money is in a separate account. Over time, there have been very few recounts and lawyers have managed to use up all the money. He did ask the FEC if the money can be transferred to regular GRP account. Ian also checked with FEC about returning the money. The FEC says we can transfer unlimited funds into GRP account. The question is do we think we should keep this money. What fits the GRP values. Could we find a legal loophole to keep this money.

Elie commented that MA is a state, because of one-party-rule, it is easily studied for wrong doing. Perception is not one to be ignored. He suggested checking with Chuck Turner for his opinion. He also suggested that John be consulted about returning the money. It could represent an opportunity to ask donors what to do with money. John suggested sending a letter to donors explaining that we have not spent all money and will refund money to you or apply to other projects. David Rolde objected to John’s suggestion of writing a letter and returning money to donors. He is okay with asking if GRP can keep money.

Ian will call Mel King for advice; from there he knows what to do. A vote by donors on what GRP should do with money is not advisable. A better plan is to advise donors what GRP plans to do with the money.

Budget

Ian provided a brief overview of the budget.

$600 has been designated for CDLC. The state convention is the biggest event of the year. Other expenses are internet services. State candidate expenses are paid from the state fund as well as IRV. Jill has been the only federal candidate.

Ian asked if there was any feedback for the treasurer. David Rolde commented on NationBuilder corporation collecting private data. Ian explained that NationBuilder is a conglomeration website for email lists, tracking system for who donates on a certain page. For example, contributions made to the convention or to regular donation page. NationBuilder is used by many campaigns. The Democrats have their own database. Nat Fortune selected NationBuilder. We have to decide where our resources are used. He asked that additional comments about budget be sent directly to him.

Round Robin:

Ian – meeting multi headed, need more focus so people can do their homework.

Elie – in the past, Greens in Ma had its own staff of website designers at no cost.

Nancy – need more structure. She has difficult time navigating website.

Roger – came to meeting with zero preparation.

David R. – will try to prepare better for next meeting. He suggested providing proposals via email. He added that presentation on RCV was a waste of time and not StateCom business.

Brian – meeting was frustrating.

Charlene – difficult to prepare for StateCom this meeting. We can only accomplish so much in allotted time. She thought the RCV presentation was educational. Great to host StateCom meeting. She was pleased with separate StateCom meeting held for new Greens. Nashua River annual report and CDLC report will be posted.

Roni – agreed with Brian that the meeting was somewhat frustrating. She suggested that StateCom meet more often. There is too much business to conduct in four meetings a year. She asked StateCom members to think about serving on AdCom. Roni reported that AdCom met 12 times since October 1 and that as secretary she responded to 33 voice mail and email messages.

John – suggested that StateCom conduct some business via telecon. He thought the presentation on RCV was timely and he was disappointed an action decision was made. He asked Ben to contact AdCom about RCV and take action.

Meeting adjourned 4:10 pm

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

6. GRP Support of Ranked Choice Voting

[The following text should be added to your reading package for Sunday's StateCom meeting. It was developed by Voter Choice Massachusetts to provide a specific example of the kind of commitments they feel would help the GRP show leadership in support of the Massachusetts ranked choice voting initiative. Adam Friedman of VCMA is on the agenda to report on the progress of the initiative and answer questions.]

1. The GRP adopts the following statement "The Green-Rainbow Party endorses efforts to implement a ranked-choice voting (RCV) system in Massachusetts through pursuit of the ballot referendum effort being organized by Voter Choice Massachusetts.

[Note: GRP has already adopted RCV as a general policy. But a statement is needed to say that we specifically support the Voter Choice referendum effort. AdCom can join coalitions for the Party as long as the coalition promotes approved policies. So the final approval could come from AdCom if StateCom is not ready to act. ]

2. GRP shall send one email blast per month for the next six months informing their members of the progress of the Voter Choice Massachusetts campaign along with one or more calls to action for members to get involved -- including volunteering, donating, or signing up for updates. VCMA shall assist in drafting email blast contents.

3. GRP shall share their phone list with Voter Choice Massachusetts to allow VCMA organizers to recruit volunteers and raise funds from GRP members, subject to GRP approval of all phone scripts and with the understanding that VCMA will return all notes and data about successful contacts.

4. GRP State Committee shall encourage, when applicable, their members to participate in local VCMA campaign opportunities; including but not limited to tabling at events, hosting house parties, participating in phone banking, and signature collecting.

Budget Impact: 2018 impact will be discussed at a later time. For 2017, the Candidate/Movement schools will be funded in part by donations from participants with means, Stein Campaign, Green Party US. The hope would be that the schools would except for scholarships for participants from disadvantaged communities would fund most of the cost. Additionally, shared office space (virtual office) and subscription services will be considered.

Vetting Committees: CDLC, Membership, and AdCom

We are an electoral Party. The energy from the Northampton and Boston Rallies for our Presidential Candidate, Jill Stein showed that electoral action may be for the Party.

CDLC will continue to make the races for the municipal elections in 2017 and State House of Representatives and State Senate in 2018, its top priority.

Membership will explore methods to increase our enrollment which may increase our influence on GPUS committees and conventions.

The 2018 Electoral Action Working Group will:

Recruit a diverse slate of candidates for the 2018 statewide elections. This Committee will report to the CDLC, StateCom and AdCom.

Initial focus of the effort will be on the positions that require 5,000 signatures (rather than 10,000). These positions are Secretary, Treasurer, and Auditor

Because of the 10,000 signature requirements for Attorney General, Governor, and Senator, approval from AdCom (with consultation with CDLC) will be required before searching for candidates for these positions.

The members slate will be approved by State Com

Research a method query (poll) members (and not members) on issues.

Strive to assemble a team of shared campaign managers, treasurers, volunteer coordinators, and media coordinators ready and willing to support candidates should they agree to run. Willing potential candidates may have invest time in

Work with CDLC, GPUS Coordinated Campaign Committee (limited funds are available) , Stein Campaign, and Maine Green Independent Party (possibly other state parties) to have one or more Candidate/Movement schools in the area.

Consider based on funds a Party shared office space (virtual office) for phone banking and to receive inquiries about the Party for the fall of 2017 through the end of the campaign 2018.

Or sign in with email

Create an account

6. GRP Support of Ranked Choice Voting
3, as a member of the Party I would feel better if the phone calls were done under the supervision of GRP members as ears to the phones.
What is the the purpose of six months? This doesn’t fix with the initiative process [http://www.mass.gov/ago/government-resources/initiatives-and-other-ballot-questions/]. 10 people file a petition on August 2 with the text. The AG’s review is completed by September 2.
If a petition is files does the GRP have a choice of some number of members of petitioners?
What is the GRP going to do to be ready for input into the AG review?

Powered by people like you

The Green-Rainbow Party is the Massachusetts affiliate of the Green Party of the United States (MA political designation "J"). It was founded in 2002 through the union of the Massachusetts Green Party and the Rainbow Coalition Party.