&quot;Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster&quot; (AJP Taylor) - Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to G to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Target: Main target - evaluation of sources for their sufficiency, drawing conclusions from evidence (AO 6.2 and 6.3 and 6.1) "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster." (AJP Taylor). Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to G to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. From knowledge, sources A to G, and from other sources, I know that Dunkirk could be seen as both a disaster and deliverance. I am going to go through the facts and sources and then decide whether or not there is enough evidence to support AJP Taylor's quote. Source A, is a contemporary painting of troops being rescued from the beaches, by Charles Cundall, from which we can see German bomber planes bombing the British troops. This shows Dunkirk to be a disaster. ...read more.

Middle

This was that "everything was perfect" and that the British troops were all safe and that the Germans would not defeat Britain. In Source A, this image of "everything being perfect" is portrayed, as overall, there is an image of a British Victory being exposed. This is the point where I can comment on the insufficiency of this source, because it only shows you what the British Government wanted you to see. Source B, is a photograph of the Dunkirk beaches. Firstly, from the photograph we can see that there is no German bombing of any kind. The British troops seem to be patiently waiting on the beach, and we do not even in fact know from this source whether or not this evacuation at Dunkirk actually even took place and even if this is a Dunkirk beach, as we are having to take the sources at face value. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source D, is an extract from a speech by Anthony Eden, Minister of War, June 1940. Firstly, I am going to state the fact that this source is biased, as it is a speech by the Minister of War, whose job is to keep British spirits high, and so therefore, obviously he would not mention any major aspects of failure and defeat. In the Source, the Minister of War praises the British Soldiers, saying that they did not just give up, but they remained a "body of seasoned veterans". He calls them this as they have had an experience of war already. This makes the Battle of Dunkirk a deliverance as the soldiers have been said to have carried on fighting instead of giving up and this shows us that there morale was high. Anthony Eden admits to "great losses in equipment", this is a disaster as they have lost armament and expensive equipment. This source is also a form of propaganda as the speech is aimed at keeping the British spirit and morale high. ...read more.

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

Source J is another photograph, showing an anti-war demonstration at Kent State University in America. Demonstrations such as this one occurred worldwide, and they gave citizens a chance to display their views regarding the war. People may have changed their attitudes because of these demonstrations, and even if they did

The first was published in August 1986 and effectively placed the blame solely on the power plant operators. The second theory, proposed by Valeri Legasov and published in 1991, attributed the accident to flaws in the RBMK reactor design, specifically the control rods.

There were many reasons for people to be against military action. Many people were simply fed up with war, having had to endure the First and Second World Wars, and more recently the Korean War. Accordingly people would shudder at the prospect of yet another war.

Nixon was already in power, deciding whether to end the war. The picture was so controversial that newspapers were at first reluctant to print the picture, they claimed it was full frontal nudity. The purpose of the picture was to shock Americans, and was motivation for a peace movement.

Oleg Khlevnyuk, in particular, has outlined the different stages of the terror in terms of the targets of the purges, and has offered a more refined periodisation of the actual beginnings of mass repression. He has pointed out that 'up until the middle of 1937, the main blow of repression

The same artist drew both these cartoons at the time the Gallipoli campaign occurred and were published in 'The Anzac Book'. This artist is Australian and so it may mean that the source is biased to make the Anzacs look better.

Although this source is very effective for its purpose, it has no hatred for the Germans. The second part of the source is another poster using women to persuade men to enlist to the war. The picture shows two women and a child looking on, as soldiers get ready to leave for war.