Fifty one percent of voters with children in public school believe in Gov. Andrew Cuomo — compared to 38 percent of them who have faith in the union.

In labor-leaning households, 47 percent back Cuomo.

Slightly more New Yorkers like the way Cuomo handles education. They “overwhelmingly” support his proposed education reforms.

Sixty-four percent like Cuomo’s call for merit pay for good profs; 67 percent want it to be easier to fire bad teachers; and 87 percent like basing educator layoffs on performance and not seniority.

New Yorkers generally think that public school teachers are doing a good job — 49-23 percent — and parents with sons and daughters in public schools like them even more (54-23 percent.)

Many, however, think the union hurts kids more than helps them — 50-37 felt that the United Federation of Teachers plays a negative rather than a positive role when it comes to fixing New York’s education system.

“They trust [Cuomo] more than the teachers’ union to look out for the kids and they support [him] by margins of 2-1, up to 9-1 proposals to reform the schools,” Maurice Carroll, director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, says.

“New York City voters did not provide that level of trust for Mayor Michael Bloomberg when they told us they trusted the teachers’ union more than the mayor to look out for the kids. The teachers union is a political punching bag these days, and New York voters share that negative view. Does the union play a positive role? New Yorkers say no. Support for the union isn’t high even in union households,” he says.

New Yorkers also don’t want to ban churches from renting space in public school buildings — 54-34 percent say that it’s a “bad idea.”

Voters also don’t appear to have any clue whatsoever about gerrymandering — 67 percent don’t know anything about redistricting and 71 percent don’t know whether they’re OK with it or not.

‘The World Trade Center was conceived by vested interests, promoted by pressure groups, brought into being by a handful of powerful men for reasons of monetary gain or personal pressure, and indirectly subsidized by the taxpayer’