Saturday, 18 March 2017

Good morning, Maria Grazia, and thank you for welcoming me
to your wonderful blog. I am thrilled to launch the blog tour for my latest
release, Mistress, here at My Jane Austen Book Club. Today I
wanted to share with you and your readers a post about one of my favorite
Austen heroes, Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy. Like quite a few women, I was mildly
horrified by the New York Times article that envisioned Mr. Darcy as a pale,
rather thin man with powdered hair. Horrified, and a little perplexed.

Darcy from the study
mentioned in the article, vs., of course, Colin Firth’s portrayal

Assuming the 1811 timeline of Pride and Prejudice, Darcy was
better than 15 years past when hair powder was common. Following a tax on hair
powder in 1795, use fell off rapidly. It’s pretty possible that Darcy might
never have used hair powder at all, and I can see no way that an 1811 Darcy
would have had powdered hair.

The entire look of this sketch Darcy seems to ignore,
well, Beau Brummel

Brummel, well before 1811, had ushered in a revolution in
men’s fashion. It is known today as dandyism, but what Brummel created was, in
its fundamentals, the suit. Gone were the elaborate colors and embroidered
coats of the fops,and in their place, a dark coat and tan trousers (trousers!),
exquisitely tailored. Gone too was long hair, in its place short haircuts such
as the Brutus. And Brummel also ushered in a greater emphasis on hygiene, as a
proponent of a daily hot bath. Personally, I think it almost certain that Darcy,
as a young man of the ton, would have followed Brummellian fashion.

I don’t know enough about the argument for a narrow,
decidedly un-Firthian jaw to comment, but the sloping shoulders and
underdeveloped torso I’m also a pretty dubious of. The article argues that
powerful thighs were the ideal for a gentleman, borne of frequent horse riding,
and as someone who rode for many years myself, I can definitely say that it
builds a lot of strength in one’s thighs. But there is also a certain amount of
core strength required, and riding was not the only pastime for a gentleman –
boxing and fencing were also popular and would have certainly built upper-body
strength. The combo of tan trousers and dark coat did emphasize the thighs more, but that doesn’t mean men were
emaciated up top. I think the degree of, well, musculature that Darcy had in
various areas of his body would have been entirely related to what sports he
participated in, and is therefore open to interpretation. As well, some of
those sports would have seen him out of doors a great deal, and therefore not
the pale fellow seen in the sketch.

Brummel redefined what it was to look masculine, during the
Regency, and I think this is part of the allure of that era still holds for
modern readers. Personally, I find it difficult to see a man in a wig and a
pastel, embroidered coat as sexy. But a man wearing the clothes below?
Absolutely sexy.

A great example of Regency sporting clothes

Mistress was the
first time I’ve written more detailed intimate scenes between our dear couple,
and it was important to me that both Elizabeth and modern readers see that
Darcy is physically attractive. Taking a bit of inspiration from Georgette
Heyer’s Regency Buck, where Judith
Taverner mistakes a man in a spangled coat for Brummell, I had Elizabeth
compare the rather over-dandied Mr. Althorpe to Mr. Darcy. The latter, of
course, is actually nearer Brummell’s ideal:

Elizabeth looked up,
then, and found the object of her thoughts entering the drawing-room, and
looking very well that evening. While Mr. Althorpe could rightly be described
as a dandy, everything about Mr. Darcy’s dress was exceedingly understated, and
yet clearly of the highest quality. She chastised herself, then, for the last
thing she should be doing after her conversations with Jane and Mr. Althorpe
was contemplating Mr. Darcy’s manner of dressing. Still, when he gave her what
seemed a particular glance and smiled, Elizabeth could not help but return his
smile fully.

Elizabeth can see what’s attractive about such a man, and
hopefully so can readers, in their imaginations. Perhaps that’s why I reacted
rather strongly to the sketched Darcy in the NYT article. I still think it’s
more likely that he’s nearer Colin Firth than the man in the sketch. If there’s
anything I’d criticize, it’s that there’s a bit too much color happening in his
coats and waistcoats in the miniseries, something This Charming Man, a dramatization of
Brummell's life, gets right.

The whole movie is worth a view (although it gets a bit
weird at the end) for those readers interested in all that Brummell did for
Regency fashion. But those looking for a shortcut (or a lovely, if X-rated
preview), can start with this YouTube video.

Book Description

One
night, to decide his entire life's happiness.

Chastened
by Charles Bingley following Mr. Bennet’s untimely death, Fitzwilliam Darcy
determines he will offer marriage to Elizabeth Bennet, but she marries another.

Years
later, a widowed Elizabeth is mistress of Longbourn, and has vowed she will
never marry again. A house party at Netherfield brings them back together, but
Darcy will have to win more than her heart if he is to have any chance at
making her mistress of Pemberley.

Readers
of Sophie Turner's more chaste Constant Love series should be aware that this
novel contains decidedly adult content at certain parts of the story.

Sophie
Turner worked as an online editor before delving even more fully into the tech
world. Writing, researching the Regency era, and occasionally dreaming about
living in Britain are her escapes from her day job.

She
was afraid of long series until she ventured upon Patrick O’Brian’s 20-book
Aubrey-Maturin masterpiece, something she might have repeated five times
through.

Alas,
her Constant Love series is only
planned to be seven books right now, and consists of A Constant Love, A Change of Legacies, and the in-progress A Season Lost.

She
blogs about her writing endeavours at sophie-turner-acl.blogspot.com, where readers can find direction
for the various social drawing-rooms across the Internet where she may be
called upon.

Vesper, yes, I think the adaptations have left most people thinking of actors when they think of Darcy. But since it's fiction to begin with, I think whatever each reader has in her or his mind as Darcy can be their Darcy.

darcybennett, haha, agreed! Before the fashion revolution that was the Regency, I think people must have had to judge other people based on entirely different aesthetics.

Enjoyable post and congrats on the new book! My Darcy is more what you describe- with the powerful thighs :) Not the effeminate featured Brommel. I'm looking forward to reading this book. I'll be honest, Elizabeth-Collins parings make me want to cringe sometimes but I was happy to see that he does not make it very far into the book. But I love the stories where Elizabeth retains her strong character despite past horrible backstories and Darcy has to charm out her loving personality again. Love that there is a Spotify playlist to go along with the book! Thanks for the giveaway chance too.

Colleen, I definitely hear you on Elizabeth-Collins pairings, and I'll assure you that he doesn't survive the prologue. Her first marriage certainly affects Elizabeth, though, and I love the way you described Darcy having to charm out her loving personality again. :-)

bn100, glad to hear you enjoyed them!

Julia, yeah, that was my reaction on first seeing the article. Glad you saw the refutal first in case you encounter it elsewhere!

My first visualisation of Darcy was Laurence Olivier, as my introduction to the works of Jane Austen was via the 1940 film of P&P. Later, he evolved into someone slightly younger looking (Darcy's late 20s as opposed to Olivier's mid 30s) but not really like anyone in particular from real life, and I include Colin Firth in that. I sometimes hear Colin's voice when I'm reading but that's as far as it goes. My Darcy is tall, dark and drop-dead gorgeous but nothing more. He certainly doesn't have powdered hair!

My problem with that drawing is that the Powder Tax was brought in during 1795. Jane Austen wrote her first draft of First Impressions a year or two AFTER that and it wasn't published, as Pride and Prejudice, until some 16-17 years later after major revisions. So when did her visualistion of Darcy date from? The days of the first draft, when a gentleman of his status might have paid for a certificate to carry on using hair powder, or the later draft, when he almost certainly wouldn't have? We'll never know and in the end, he's a fictional character (shock horror!) so we can imagine him any way we choose and not be bound by dramatic portrayals or historians" drawings.

Anji, I'm with you. Darcy in my head sometimes veers into Firth territory (I do think he did an excellent job playing him), but more often he's a more nebulous handsome, dark-haired man. Definitely tall. And yeah the Powder Tax was definitely my issue with it, too. Regardless of who Austen had visualized as Darcy, I think by the time it was published her expectation would have been that people envisioned Darcy and Elizabeth as "modern" people. If I recall, there was even some concern over references to places in Bath seeming outdated in Northanger Abbey, because that was written so much earlier. It might have been her family, though, and not her, since it was published posthumously. Although she did revise it before her death. I need to dig into this more.

What an interesting post-informative, interesting and one that definitely provided good for thought!

I know I'm not alone in having the '95 P&P characters in my head whenever I read JAFF. To me,Colin is Mr Darcy,Jennifer, Elizabeth while Benjamin is our dear Mr B!

I finished this wonderful book last night and I can honestly say it was one of the most compelling,beautifully written books that ive ever read. Delightful,heart wrenching, deeply moving and of course,highly recommended!

Mary, thank you so much for your kind words about the book. I'm a reader first and a writer second -- I write because I want to create these experiences for others. So to hear this book resonated with you is absolutely wonderful to hear.

Thank you, Sophie, for justified rebuttal of that new York Times vision of how Mr.Darcy could have looked in their opinion. I was stressed a lot by the powdered hair blue coat picture, and so I heartily welcome your counter arguments:) And look forward to enjoying your blog tour and trying my luck in one of the wonderful giveaways.

Thanks Maria for making these wonderful observations about masculinity. Darcy should make an understated, elegant figure. No wigs. :)Thanks for the giveaway. Congratulations on the book release, Sophie.

About Me

I've been an English teacher for a long time now and a blogger for more than 5 years. I love classic literature, reading, theatre, period drama, art and that is what I usually write about on FLY HIGH and My Jane Austen Book Club. I'd love to hear from you! Leave your comments to my posts or send e-mail messages to learnonline.mgs@gmail.com.