AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2006, upon consideration of pro se plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 104) of the order of court dated August 15, 2006 (Doc. 103), in which the court denied plaintiff's motion for leave to file an interlocutory appeal (Doc. 100), and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order,*fn1 see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 104) is DENIED.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.