The Fundamental Premise

Eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap. Every psychological dynamic you see playing out in mass societies liberated from artificial constraints on the sexual market flows from this premise. This means, as a systemic matter, women are coddled, men are upbraided. Women are victims, men are victimizers. Women need a leg up, men need to man up. Women have advocacy groups, men have equal opportunity violations. A woman subjected to the indignity of eavesdropping on a tame joke about dongles makes national news, while the chilling fact that 95% of all workplace deaths are suffered by men barely pings the media consciousness.

It is what it is, and it will never change so long as humans are a sexually reproducing species. All the laws in the world can at best only paper over the very primal compulsion of people to value the life of the average woman more than the life of the average man, and sympathize accordingly. Railing against it is akin to shaking a fist at sunspots and gamma rays. It’s therefore folly or self-serving disingenuousness to act like there’s some moral high ground to stake out by imparting culpable agency to an indifferent, organically emergent biomechanical phenomenon. Rationalizing favoritism toward women as some sort of payback for male privilege, or refusing to acknowledge this favoritism altogether, is an example of the cognitive calisthenics and evasive sophistry most people will indulge to avoid grappling with the cold, black void of an uncaring evolutionary replication machine.

If you are a man, know that the moment you were born the universe had it in for you. The deck was stacked. The deal was raw. Your expendability was programmed into your wet code before you gained self-awareness. The worldscape of genes can rebuild with the seed of one man should catastrophe strike, but each woman lost is a lethal blow to the repopulation project.

In sober moments free of maudlin introspection, you will understand there is no other game to play save this one. This is why to live as a man is to TAKE what you want. Not to wait for it to be given to you. Because it will never be given. Not to anticipate the empathy of the overseers. Because they will never empathize. Not to expect the coddling of the crowd. Because they will never coddle. Not to assume the wagon circling of kindreds. Because they will never circle for you. You got the short stick, now what? Do you contemplate it and hope for a longer one? No.

You sharpen it and jab it into the heart of every obstacle that sets itself in your way.

Like this:

Related

373 Responses

To be a man is to spin the genetic roulette wheel in a way that no woman ever will.

To wit: the Y chromosome lacks many of the regions found on the X, and is additionally more variable as a result of how it pairs with its counterpart during meiosis.

That said, some of you will win quite a bit of money; just remember that the house always wins in the end, and we shuffle off the mortal coil with empty pockets. Until then, there’s no excuse to not live large and sleep with beautiful women (consecutively or simultaneously).

Except women obey the hamster, not logic, so a collective ‘cutting down’ is unlikely. And even if it happened, there would be an equivalent male response. We’re not dumb.

Furthermore, most guys (and girls) who ‘know’ of game have it horribly twisted into some form of cheesy PUA pickup lines and other foolishness they believe is the be all end all get pussy quick shortcut – except it’s not.

There are no (lasting) shortcuts, but nevertheless it’s fun to watch the freshly confused take a swing.

Yes but game has reached the mainstream. It’s only a matter of time before women become hip to it and cut down male/female interaction to the basic pay-for-play.
———————————————————————-
Would it really change anything? Its possible the alpha ratio is a physical constant and does not change? 500, 10,000 years ago there may have been the same relative percentage of alphas vs betas… as today.

Women will (and do) refuse to believe game can work in the first place. ‘How could you possibly reduce something as special and spontaneous as love, attraction and desire down to something which equates to a “how to” manual?’ the hamster spins. Besides, men who practice game are creepy loses, they have nothing on “naturally alpha” guys who give them tingles.

And as long as there are single mothers there will be a steady supply of pedastal worshipping betas, over whom game will always give an advantage.

‘How could you possibly reduce something as special and spontaneous as love, attraction and desire down to something which equates to a “how to” manual?’

—ironically, these women will spend the most time reading relationship websites and books and magazine articles and talking with girlfriends on “how to give him the best sex ever” and “how to find a long term mate” and “how to make him commit.”

Well said. The sadomasochistic tendencies of the feminists are manifold. They verbally profess superiority over males. They internally desire subjugation. I’ve never met any who are counter to this. I never ever grace a feminist with the presence of my affection. I make it well known that this, a real man, is something they will never have because of their misguided bleating at the ordained order of the world.

When I take a “naive” and “non-liberated” woman as a wife, it will be a visible choice to all of them. This is the only type of woman a man will tolerate long term. I want a woman who does not seek to embody male qualities. I want a woman who does not seek to suppress my male qualities. I want somebody who can play by the Biblical/evolutionary rulebook. Feminists are an abomination to biology and religion. They will be spat out before the 21st century is done.

They will not be spat out unless civilization falls apart somewhat, and it may. Don’t underestimate the effects of things like the sea level rising 20′-40′, temperature hot as hell, unexpected nuclear bombs going off. I heard an interview with an extremely successful options trader at the end of his career – he was asked to what he attributed his wild success over the decades and he replied “Most people don’t understand how bad things can get” . That being said, it hopefully won’t happen. We may end up a maternalistic society (even more than now) like some African socieities where women basically run the show.

Don’t believe the hype on the African thing. Women do not run the show. They just have different departments in different cultures.

The women may run the market in some places, but they bring that money home to Daddy. They may be out working in the fields with the infants strapped to their back, but in literate families, Dad and older brothers are educating the kids.

One reason school attendance is so low in some places isn’t because the poor families can’t afford it, but because the kids are being home schooled. A relatively high proportion of African university students were home schooled or something close to that.

Feminists, churches, and many pseudo charities have an interest in painting Africa very differently from the way that it is. Some want to justify feminism by saying that cultures are matriarchal rather than matrilineal by necessity, or basing who has the authority on who is bringing currency rather than how the families are sustaining their lives overall.

Feminists are an abomination to biology and religion.
—————————————————–
abomination? sure, but a contradiction? I think not (at least for biology) SWPL want to “save the rain forest” because it has the cure for every disease. But they forget that it also has every disease too. Where do these feminists come from?

Which is why so much of the Cultural Marxist propaganda and programming targets women. They are the weak link to be targeted.

They are the weak link in two senses: women are the weaker link as agents, and thus are more easily lead astray by propaganda and programming, having less critical thinking ability to see through such propaganda; and women are the weaker link in a structural sense, being the foundation of the family and thus society, they are the natural target of those who want to destroy the family and society.

Some men resist, and some don’t. Targeting women does an end run around men, and most men will follow along.

Salesmen knew it. Marketers knew it. Women will buy anything so long as you play to their ear. They’re the naive sheep of the land. That’s why they doubled down on Obama after double digit real unemployment for 3.8 years.

The funny thing though is that the majority of white women voted for Romney, even though when you include minorities “women” voted for Obama…but that was heavily skewed by the 98% of black women and 83% of Latino women who voted for Obama. Either way the white/minority vote divergence is much greater than the man/woman divergence.

The story of Genesis was a warning for tribal men – keep your woman in line, or risk falling for her bullshit. It was a warning to all men to be strong in the face of female influence, not to be tricked by their beauty into doing things that fuck you over. It was a warning about the disruptive, destructive nature of woman. Adam chose hos before bros and look what it got him. Small wonder his ancestors thought it would also be a good idea to exile women to a separate hut when they were having their period.

I don’t think that’s right – at least in 20th century North America. I know the statistic is based on genetic research. Twice as many women have living descendants as men. So maybe it’s true in the long-run, but I think that for for a man or woman born in 1925, say, the odds were much more similar.

Spare us your intellectual fapping. Nietzsche grooved on meaninglessness, despite his silly moral relativism and his yammering about the will to power. He’s pretty much the patron antisaint of nihilism.

I won’t bother refuting your unsound assumptions about matters of truth, morality, and Christian faith here. This ain’t the place.

In sober moments free of maudlin introspection, you will understand there is no other game to play save this one. This is why to live as a man is to TAKE what you want. Not to wait for it to be given to you. Because it will never be given. Not to anticipate the empathy of the overseers. Because they will never empathize. Not to expect the coddling of the crowd. Because they will never coddle. Not to assume the wagon circling of kindreds. Because they will never circle for you. You got the short stick, now what? Do you contemplate it and hope for a longer one? No.

You sharpen it and jab it into the heart of every obstacle that sets itself in your way.

The students, the victims, at Columbine High School were big, tough high school students, and under ordinary circumstances they would not have had the time of day for a police officer. They were not bad kids; they just had nothing to say to a cop. When the school was under attack, however, and SWAT teams were clearing the rooms and hallways

Would that be the SWAT teams that showed up 45 minutes later because they had to properly organize in order to minimize the risks to themselves? When seconds count the police are only minutes away.

A sheepdog is a servile creature that forgoes his ancestral imperative for Master’s accolades and table scraps. That metaphor is always referenced as some kind of ideal straddling sheep and wolf, but I’ve always found the to be rather role demeaning and pathetic, as well as a bit of a cop out.

Of course, I can hardly claim to be wolf myself: rather a particularly ornery and indigestible sheep all too cognizant of his dismal place in the present order.

And he spake this parable unto certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others: 10 Two men went up into the temple to pray ; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican. 11 The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. 12 I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess . 13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying , God be merciful to me a sinner. 14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased ; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted .

Have you linked this before? Makes a compelling case – with reams of hard data – that elite colleges discriminate against non-Jewish whites and Asians. Also touches on the fact that USA is the only historically successful multicultural nation in history (towards the end). Long read but good.

Also touches on the fact that USA is the only historically successful multicultural nation in history

I don’t think “successful” means what they think it means.

And the US hasn’t been truly “multicultural” in any significant way until about the 1980s. Blacks were too small a portion of the overwhelmingly white population to matter other than as financial drains and pests, and were largely culturally acclimated to white culture even if often living on the disreputable fringes of it.

It’s the post-60s tsunami of Mestizos, Asians, Arabs, Africans that began hitting the tipping point in the 80s that has flipped the multicultural bird at the legacy white culture. The results of that experiment, while still technically “incomplete,” have every single indicator pointing to failure. Other than, you know, really good taco trucks.

Blacks were too small a portion of the overwhelmingly white population to matter other than as financial drains and pests,
———————————————————————-
What are you talking about? Without us, you couldn’t be white. We are the best thing that ever happened to you. Matter of fact, if we weren’t here, you would have designated some white people to be nigs, like these:

What a cow of a woman. She decided something is sexist and gets two blokes fired over her own indignation? Fuck, America must be one shitty place to live atm if the threat of sexual harrasment is hanging over you like this all the time

No representation of the manosphere on google plus. If you type in the name sendgrid you will see a lot of clueless manginas who assume from the feminist-biased Verge and BBC articles (from today) that “a woman was fired for complaining about sex harassment”. So they are saying the company CEO was a coward, etc.

Naturally, nobody cares about the programmer fired from Playhaven.

You need a gmail address to have an account on google plus. Create one and make it seem like you are a real person and do searches on such subjects and then politely set some of these clueless men straight about the facts in such cases.

I don’t have time. But someone here has an anonymous gmail account they could use. Let them know that the fembot tweeted a dirty joke minutes before she complained about men making one in the row behind her. Ask them if they would like to have a company suddenly represented by a radical feminist.

It is 100% mangina on google plus now. Readers there deserve better. Be polite however. It’s not a free for all like twitter. You are typing in the comments of posts like in facebook except that everything is public and searchable, unlike facebook.

People in Silicon Valley are afraid to use their real names to condemn feminism. The Sendgrid CEO even had to pretend he felt Adria was offended by the dongle reference whispered between two guys behind her that were far milder than the gross reference to a stuffed sock she just tweeted to ten thousand followers.

We need some good fake named men on google plus because bots consider posts there to be more important than on twittter. You can also say more there. You are not limited to 140 characters, which is why feminists are winning on twitter (they can get their simplistic points of view across in 140 characters easily).

BTW, CH does not understand that he should be directly posting about his new posts on a number of social media profiles, the least important of which would be twitter. CH believes that he doesn’t need to announce new posts on Twitter because his readers there will go to his blog. But that is not the purpose of referencing a link in a tweet. A reference is not to get new readers directly but almost entirely because google will consider his wordpress posts to be more important in the long run if it appears that he, or someone, cares enough to promote them more.

Feminists are better at marketing than CH and the other manosphere “heavies”.

The biggest mistake CH is making is the way he write esoteric headlines without trending terms.

The enemy does not make that mistake anymore. Not in the age of google.

The enemy yesterday made their headlines “Sendgrid fires Adria Richards for Complaining About Sexual Harassment”.

Guess where all the traffic went?

You can’t blame even the most ardent anti-feminists for having only read the fem-biased material about that subject yesterday. The Internet was alive yesterday with people who would have been on our side but they got all their information from that bogus Forbes article or Rachel Sklar’s dishonest Business Insider post.

The best post of all on that topic yesterday was, of course, this one. But its title is way too cool. Too cool for its own good. Nobody in Silicon Valley found it, especially the legions of newly disaffected programmers and more members of the Anonymous organization.

The headline “The Fundamental Premise” represents a past form of good literary practice. It is cool and I see why CH wrote that and kept it short and sweet. It was even “cooler” that CH did not bother to mention Adria Richards or Sendgrid in the post itself.

But that doomed the post to miss out on new readers and become more of the conversation yesterday at a moment when the situation was ripe for new readers of the manosphere.

The above could be edited to say “The Fundamental Premise or Why Sendgrid Will Catch Flak for Firing Feminist Adria Richards”.

Then it can be edited back to just “The Fundamental Premise” two months from now when the searches for Sendgrid and Adria Richards die down.

Another big mistake CH makes is that he fails to follow up on important stories. An example would be that he never followed up on the persecution of Assange by feminists and manginas on the right who wanted him charged with rape for not being willing to get a test for HIV.

By not following up, Assange followers never decided that this was a place for them to hang out and await further updates or comment discussion. It would have been so easy to post a few followups with trending terms in the headlines. But CH may have felt this would somehow be uncool along the lines of “Alphas keep thinking of new things to talk about and not regurgitate old subjects”. That may be true for seduction but not for getting new readers and securing new groups the way CH secured the respect of WNs by following up on immigration issue talk.

If CH wants Silicon Valley industrialists and programmers on his side, he will need to finally do more than one official post on the subjects and make his headlines include the terms people are actually looking for today.

Make this a place for disaffected Silicon Valley programmers to come to for their daily fix. To do that, make 5 or 6 posts clearly about the Adria Richards fiasco.

Ideally he should do several posts per week with headlines that aim for the trending terms of the day.

been like that for a long time
chicks fucking the boss
then a year later say sexual harassment then promotion for chick fired for dude
oh well dudes in management got fired for all kinds of other shit too it didn’t pay to be management traditional it did pay to be operations

One of the most disgusting things I ever saw and heard in my life was when one of Will Smith’s kids did a sort of remake of _Pumped Up Kicks_. It was rewritten to be about how popular he was and all the chicks wanted him.

Very few times in my life have I ever wanted to put a fist through my monitor…

I think it’s gone far beyond coddled and gotten well into utterly clueless.

What about greater betas like me that simply don’t have the heart to have a harem? I simply don’t have it in me to lie to girls.

I’m what you call a serial dater. I like to have my main woman, take care of each other with love. If things don’t work out I find me another. It doesn’t take me very long at all I have good game have always been good with women for the most part. I’m too big of a Jesus lover to bang multiple women I like my main woman.

I wish I could be like you but I don’t have the self control. I love my wife and kids but I can’t be monogamous. I just don’t have it in me. When I see a girl with a cute face I can’t help myself. I need to learn game to control my wife’s freak outs better. I don’t even know how she finds out about my indiscretions. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.

=The worldscape of genes can rebuild with the seed of one man should catastrophe strike, but each woman lost is a lethal blow to the repopulation project.=
This theory is feminist to the core. Its other way aroud. A tribe with 1 female and 10 males has a chance to survive while a tribe with only 1 male and 10 pregnant females will die out. Furthermore males have greater genetic variation than females.

Why is he a retard? The 10-male tribe will raid the 1-male tribe, cut your, er, his balls off and stuff them in your, um, his mouth before shoving a spear all the way up your, ah, his ass, and then take turns fucking the 10 women.

Lol, okay. And if the tribes don’t come into contact? If it’s just one big tribe? If we’re not talking about humans but just any of the tons of species where eggs are expensive and sperm cheap?

Calling this theory “feminist to the core” is retarded. It is a scientific fact that exists regardless of passing fads like feminism. You would know that if you had even a shallow understanding of biology.

Tell me how the fact that women have a much smaller reproductive potential than men supports any of the feminist bullshit? Tell me how it supports the notion that men and women are the same? Realities like this are why the blank-slatist are the liberal equivalent of Flat-Earth creationist. What could be more damning to the “gender roles are social constructs” tripe than facts like this?

That’s a bit excessively derogatory. Women aren’t “back ups,” but the finished product. That women are closer to the animal is I think not a terribly contentious assertion to make in these circles, but those traits are tenuous, experimental and recent. As such, their prevalence in men is no surprise. What’s worrisome is that if present idiocratic reproductive trends continue, these prototypical genes may fade into oblivion before they’re given time to fully cement themselves in the XX side of things.

Men are superior to women at man things. The problem, ironically, the problem that has been exasterbated by feminism, is that all success is now measured according to male metrics. So yes, men are stronger, more logical, handle pressure better, earn more etc.

Despite how masculine our society wants to make women, we will never be as masculine as men…hence our perceived inferiority, and hence the push to equalize the playing field by feminizing women.

However, men and women are not meant to be compared but to compliment each other. When a woman can embody her role as a woman and not a man, she is no longer inferior.

The point in the post is not a moral one, its a biological reality. We are wired to value the average woman more than the average man, and we became this way because in our primordial past this would increase the fitness of the tribe.

Here is an example with two tribes:

Both tribe A and tribe B have 50 women and 50 men.

Now imagine that 90% of the women in tribe A die and 90% of the men in tribe B die.

With only 5 women left tribe A is doomed to extinction. They can no longer refill their ranks as 5 women can only produce around 5 kids a year and even then most of the kids will die before reproductive age. Tribe B on the other hand can produce 50 children per year, meaning that their reproductive capabilities have not dimnished at all.

Women’s (reproductive) value is more like rotating batches of caviar on toast points that must be served and eaten within minutes before spoiling and losing all value in a parallel universe in which steel is made of the pleasure of a be-ing called Nature that eats said caviar on toast.

It’s good to hear this again, every so often. Knowing that you’re treated as expendable strips away the illusion of having something to lose – gives you more drive in life. While reading this I couldn’t help thinking of Lose Yourself http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4Uv_4jGgAM
You always have one opportunity/choice at any given point in time – it’s whether or not to push forward.

I guess if ya look at isreal they bout to take the ultra orthodox of welfare
like 10 percent of population and been sitting on majority cabinet seats
looks like about to change
apparently ya never see it coming eh
and your a minority not much you can do sometimes if nobody cares

Or we could just go back to the old traditional model that worked, the model of the traditional nuclear family. Have you ever met a fundamentalist mormon? They seem to be doing just fine. Not sure why people dream up these difficult technological solutions when the answer to society’s issues was solved by our ancestors years and years ago – keep women in subjection.

What a stupid statement. Gay men need surrogates. I can’t even wrap my head around what you are saying.

There will always be the male desire to have a lot of sex with many women. That IS the male desire to reproduce. The male desire to reproduce is NOT manifested in two gay cuckolds raising some African baby. That is the desire to status-whore.

Flavia
.What a stupid statement. Gay men need surrogates. I can’t even wrap my head around what you are saying.
———————————————————————
This is why females should be kept out of the room when men have discussions. They get all hysterical and hyper emotional…
Geezus christ..

It is the fact that it’s a perishable necessity that makes it precious.

Sperm is cheap partly because from the time a guy is about 14 until he dies, he can make it. Women have, at best only 30 years to reproduce safely, maybe 15 years to do it optimally. She only has 10 years of being the prettiest she’ll ever be, and having the best chance of getting the best quality sperm she’s likely ever to get.

Some exceptions exist, and love is madness, but since the vast majority of people are shit, nobody should bank on exceptions or anything like love that isn’t based on status for men or youth and beauty for women.

Aside of good genes, a natural diet, having kids on time, and breastfeeding them means later menopause and better aging looks-wise.

I was never a beauty queen, so I never thought I could afford to be stupid about my health or beauty. I had a stupid phase of believing the pharmaceutical reps passing themselves off as doctors nowadays, but I got over it…maybe not in time to prevent the weight gain, but in time to reverse that somewhat and keep from drying up like a prune.

Capri-suns are death in a vacuum pack. I recommend you switch to fruit waters.

They can serve a purpose. It’s just that since they became feminists, they’re not serving it, so they become irrelevant.

An older woman’s job is to raise her children or be helping someone else raise their children, and during the breaks, contribute to the household’s management and income. We’re supposed to be training and helping the next generation of women.

This made me think of my former tenant, who shacked up with his 27 year old girl, who has three children…..none of them his. Then I read the article over at the spearhead about the changes to common law relationships in Canada……cannon fodder indeed…..this guy has fucked his life away, all at the young age of 25.

what was the impact of the politicization of women following sufferage? if women were non-political animals, would they be much different than they are now? Can their moral decline be traced to politicization, like blacks post 1960. the premise of sufferage was female moral superiority? did the vote ruin women by making them targets of demagogues (like hitler) and manipulated by agitators (feminists)? In other words, the epic collapse of black and female morality (perhaps some of the most significant 20th century events) have the same underlying cause: politicization. Women hold these idiotic beliefs for a reason: they are being exploited Alinsky-style.

Their lack of morals was always there. Their politicization did not cause their morals to decrease, it merely was a yet another factor(or symptom?) in their release from the societal and cultural controls that kept them in line.

This view is incorrect within families particularly first-born sons. Sons were always given preferential treatment as the carriers on of the family. Girls are killed in China. The question is OUTSIDE of the family where your analysis is correct. The best advice for men.: stay in the good graces of your parents– mother and father. They are the only people who will ever give a shit.

Men are only one technology invention away from being able to bring an egg to full birth through an artificial uterus. Once available, feminists will be immediately exterminated and normal women will serve the male state long enough to supply eggs.

Or we could just go back to the old traditional model that worked, the model of the traditional nuclear family. Have you ever met a fundamentalist mormon? They seem to be doing just fine. Not sure why people dream up these difficult technological solutions when the answer to society’s issues was solved by our ancestors years and years ago – keep women in subjection.

Thing is, you’d still need a uterus, albeit an artificial one. Call it a gestation egg. It would also still require a certain level of infrastructure to support. Should that collapse, if there are no women around, that whole all male society ceases to exist.

You should also understand that without women, males still have a hierarchy, and usually the weakest men become the women. That often includes male children and teenagers. Basically you’d have to prove some other usefulness to not be used to serve the sexual needs of your superiors.

As is played out in many cultures today, if the majority of men do not have access to women, homosexual behavior is inevitable. When it is viewed as taboo despite its inevitability, the most vulnerable are targeted for sexual exploitation. When it isn’t viewed as taboo, things usually turn out better, but status becomes far more rigid. One wouldn’t become a leader, for instance, if it was known that for some time in his life he was someone’s boytoy. I only know of one culture in which there is upward mobility among the normal ranks of men for former catchers, and this is because everyone’s a catcher until they graduate to pitcher.

We used to have walking uteri who were compelled to serve man, and look what happened, man decided to serve the incubator instead. I could totally see some omega idiot devoting himself to a life of bond servitude to his hyper realistic fuck-bot incubator. The problem is men.

I’ve heard that the name of God (YHWH, Yahweh, Jehovah, whatever variation) has as its root meaning “He that is becoming”… to capture those beyond-Man’s-understanding qualities of not being bound by time, constant-yet-ever-developing, already perfect yet capable of even greater perfection, etc., etc., etc.

What does that have to do with anything on this blog and specifically with “Eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap”?

It was an elaboration upon Dan Fletcher’s comment that “Men must become” and how, men being created in God’s image, God Himself is the ultimate “One Who Is Becoming”.

I didn’t think this was so hard a connection to make… then again, I tend to overestimate the next guy’s ability to think.

The phrase “already perfect yet capable of even greater perfection” is patently illogical and utterly impossible.

Hence my (ahem) mentioning of to capture those beyond-Man’s-understanding qualities…..

Do try to keep up, if you must comment.

As far as the usual suspect voodoo babble, let me tell you folks with ears to hear how it truly stands.

The word “yahweh” is the third person form of “hayah” and means “he is” or “he will be”.

I mentioned in my original post I’ve heard (note the emphasis… sigh) that the name of God (YHWH, Yahweh, Jehovah, whatever variation) has as its root meaning “He that is becoming”. I think “He will be” pretty much fits that bill, hence I can see why some would expand it with the “becoming”.

Yahu was actually a war deity worshiped by a tribe in this region that eventually took over and absorbed convenient bits of the Canaanite religion. Words of deities from them both are still used for various things today.

The name Yahweh or Yahueh that it evolved to was a sort of convenient compromise to the people here that is basically “She-He” backwards. They knew the people would accept an androgynous Supreme Be-ing, but not an exclusively male one.

Sorry if that bursts any bubbles. It isn’t exactly a secret, but it’s one of those things historians know but don’t like to talk about. Things didn’t magically happen from nowhere. The culture developed naturally as cultures do, and a mythology was developed around how it did, to control the sheeple.

The ability to spin tales out of whole cloth is not the mark of intelligence… even Jefferson back in the day was forced to remark about the Negro’s propensity for rhetoric, even sublime at times…. but the bottom-line is, loving the sound of words rather than their actual meaning is not the mark of profound thinking.

Where’d you study hebrew? Are you fluent? Can you really read ancient hebrew? Note, you don’t have to have an academically sanctioned degree to read hebrew, just wondering if you can actually read hebrew, or if you are just parroting some BLT gobble. “The People Could Fly!!!”…..LOLOZLOLOZLOZLZ!!!

Santa, I live in Israel, and yes I do read Hebrew. If I don’t know something, I ask a Rabbi or one of the friends or contacts of mine who is an archaeologist, historian, or biblical scholar.

There are many theories afloat about the origin of Jews, but one thing everybody here is clear about is that the biblical account is pure mythology, and even the believers are clear on the spelling of the Hebrew words for “He” and “She”.

Actual Jews don’t have an issue with an androgynous Almighty. They also understand that Yahweh is not the literal name of God. It is a term for God that is somewhat special but general, like the word God.

But I’ve learned that some folks here would rather cling to their beliefs against all reality, and eat whatever some televangelist or preacher or the government tells them. With this, I’ve had my fill of beating my head against the impenetrable wall of American ignorance.

I truly wish that some of you would make the jump and spend some time on this side of the Atlantic.

Greg Eliot
but the bottom-line is, loving the sound of words rather than their actual meaning is not the mark of profound thinking.
———————————————————————–
just because you lack the processing power (or possibly the soul) to understand a message, doesn’t mean the sound is not the meaning; sometimes it is.

I would absolutely agree with you Nicole, the origins of the biblical jews is not the same origin as those who call themselves jews today, at least for the vast majority of modern jews’ ancestry. Also, modern judaism is a mystery religion, filled with oogah boogah and kabbalist mumbo jumbo. Not that there’s anything wrong with that… let’s just say it doesn’t appeal to logic.

They also understand that Yahweh is not the literal name of God. It is a term for God that is somewhat special but general, like the word God.

Usual suspect bullshit babble… His word is very explicit that YHWH is His personal name. Whether the latinization of Jehovah is less correct than Yahweh is, in my mind and that of others, somewhat immaterial, since it’s a respectful attempt by His believers to personalize what He says is His name.

There are many sources on the ‘net for those with true curiosity… I post one here that gives a reasonable breakdown:

“Where’d you study hebrew? Are you fluent? Can you really read ancient hebrew?”

She doesn’t know Hebrew and she is lying. I have many Jewish friends, some even religious, who have taught me much about Judaism, especially God’s name. That’s how I know everything Nicole says is pure fiction and lies. In addition, every observant Christian should consider what she says about God and Judaism blasphemy, since much of our religion is based on Judaism and its Monotheistic One and Only Creator.

“(YHWH, Yahweh, Jehovah, whatever variation) has as its root meaning “He that is becoming”. I think “He will be” pretty much fits that bill, hence I can see why some would expand it with the “becoming”.

@ Greg, you’re partially right, but not quite. First, these forms of God’s name is the English pronunciation of the Hebrew, and in the Hebrew it’s not a word, but an acronym of 3 words that mean Past, Present, and Future, to indicate God is eternal – He always was, He is, and always will be. He is the Master of time, which means that long after we cease to exist, he’ll still be here. Another one of his similar names is “I am that I am,” which he used during the Exodus of the Jews from Egypt, also denoting that He’s limitless and formless and not bound by time.

Anyway, God has 70 names in ancient Hebrew corresponding to different attributes of his Grandeur. However, the YHWH name, which is made up of the 3-word acronym meaning past, present, and future, correspond to the attribute of mercy, because if not for God’s mercy most of us would cease to exists as we’re all sinners on some level or another. That’s the reason this name is used most widely in the text to remind us that God uses much mercy when dealing with us, a lot more than we deserve from Him. Always remember, God is merciful and if he punishes it’s out of mercy, much like a parent punishes a beloved child to encourage him to mend his ways. Even the pain He inflicts is for his higher purpose, which we don’t know yet because we can’t see the complete picture, but in the end it’s always for the ultimate good.

“Usual suspect bullshit babble… His word is very explicit that YHWH is His personal name. Whether the latinization of Jehovah is less correct than Yahweh is, in my mind and that of others, somewhat immaterial, since it’s a respectful attempt by His believers to personalize what He says is His name.”

Well said and a good link you provided. Yes, YHWH is more correct since his name is derived from the 3-word acronym (I mentioned above ) and is not something that could be pronounced. In fact, it’s not pronounced in Hebrew, as it’s forbidden to do so, so saying Jehovah or Yahweh wouldn’t be right or correct. His name is an abbreviation of “I was, I am, I will be,” to express his limitlessness and infiniteness. It’s what God wants to be known as. Let’s respect His wishes and stick to what he tells us to do, not what idiots like Nicole says.
_____________________________________________________

@ Nicole

“Be careful when you repeat things evangelicals pull out of their butts about Jews. They’ll embarrass you.”

What??? Are you nuts? Who should he listen to, an idiot like you? Or should he listen to the experts. After orthodox Jews, evangelicals are the closest to understanding God, Judaism, The Bible, and the origins of Christianity. You need to shut up now and stop yapping and piling more of your stupidity.

Lily, many, many things have been said about the term “Yahweh”, and it can be rearranged and dissected even to mean something like, “Yuck, he’s what?”

The fact is that with or without nikkudot, it spells “hu” and “hee” backwards. Whatever else one chooses to believe, that is a fact of the Hebrew language.

As to Yahu, as much as it pains me to spoon feed literate people who are supposedly highly interested in a subject knowledge that anyone who truly wished to be educated in would have, I will give you one clue.

Did you read the Donovan article along the same lines? Women were built with a purpose. Our greatest purpose in life is to have an care for children. Men do not have such an intrinsic purpose so they must create their own meaning in life by building civilizations, conquering, etc. Very interesting, and I think it’s right on.

What do you think about the feminist push for state-funded daycare? Why should men who are childless or men who make sacrifices so that their own wives can stay at home and raise their own children also have to fund the childcare of the rest of the population? It is extremely tyrannical and it is state sanctioned cuckoldry.

Its another example of women not being held accountable for the consequences of their own actions. Women used to avoid single motherhood because of the negative consequences attached to it. When a society attempts to remove or soften those negative consequences with things like state-funded daycare, single mom welfare, and forced child support, it acts as an enabler encouraging bad behavior. When the burden of those consequences are forced and guilted onto everyone else it contributes to the overall death spiral of that society. Under the guise of “Women’s Rights,” the rights of those upon whom their burden is forcibly placed mean nothing.

General Turgidson: Doctor, you mentioned the ratio of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn’t that necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?
Dr. Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious… service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.

Twitter has an evil new policy that won’t let you mention a batch of manboobs in one tweet without your account being suspended and then they give you one more chance if you agree not to do that again.

What happens is the leftist little girly men hit block when someone tries to communicate with them whom they disagree with.

The ghetto is no more or less free than the suburbs so long as it’s in a country wherein you’ll lose your job or get shunned from business because the thought police didn’t appreciate your sense of humor.

You think you’re better. You think you’re free. You are neither. You are just the house nigger grasping for any silly, petty thing to feel superior to the field niggers.

Fatty wears a bikini and expects to be thought of as “brave” for it. Yawwwwn.

The one that ought to alarm you is the linked post below, about “Our Body Image Heroes.” Out of 13 women, only one of them is slim…and her quote is her apologizing for being slim and promising that she isn’t trying to tell other people they should be, too.

Personally, I don’t feel morally superior because I’ve worked to stay slim. I don’t do it for moral reasons. I do it to look good for men, to feel good about myself, and to help ensure that my old age is less pain-wracked and more mobile.

However, I don’t like the idea of being SHAMED for being slim. And that’s where this narrative is going, guys…

Thing is, it’s not unhealthy to be black, gay (well, if they can avoid getting the high-five, anyway), or a feminist. It’s unhealthy to be fat. Oh, there’s a scientific debate going back and forth about whether carrying a modest amount of extra weight will kill you…but there’s no doubt about what it does to your load-bearing joints as you age.

I know a guy, a young guy, we’re talking under 40, who’s already having mobility issues because the extra 150 lbs he’s carrying around have ruined his ankles, knees, hips, and lower back. He needs a bunch of joints replaced, but his doc won’t do it until he loses some weight. Problem is, exercising is agony for him due to all the damage. Horrible Catch-22.

These women who are packing 40 extra pounds will probably have a few more years before something similar happens to them, so they’ll get to live in denial a little longer, but when it does happen (and it WILL), they won’t even have youth on their side like my friend does.

Ha ha, actually I kind of dig fat guys.
There are some things that you can do with them that you can’t do with slimmer men. I won’t elaborate. Use your imagination.
However, if they choose to try to lose weight, I support them in that.

shiva1008
That’s exactly what the feminists want you to think. Chateau Heartiste unwittingly does an extremely good job of spreading feminist propaganda.
———————————————-
I agree that heartiste is wrong in assuming that all women are intrinsically more valuable than all men just because they can have kids. Is a woman who has an IQ of 70 who has children out of wedlock before age 16 intrinsically more valuable than all men? Herbert Spencer discussed this issue in Social Statics and daniel amneus referenced Herbert Spencer in garbage generation. Here is the relevant quote:
Surely none can fail to see that were the principle of family life to be adopted and fully carried out in social life – were reward always great in proportion as desert was small, fatal results to the society would quickly follow; and if so, then even a partial intrusion of the family regime into the regime of the State, will be slowly followed by fatal results.

The Yahoo piece is pro-male compared to the BBC and Verge and Atlantic pieces. But look at the GinaTrapani tweet shown at the bottom. What she’s saying is that feminists and manginas need to click “Block” on every account that tweets against Adria Richards. Twitter then punishes the “spam” accounts that are getting blocked by so many people at once.

So GinaTrapani is organizing an unfair holocaust against anti-feminist tweeters.

And it’s working. I know someone who got suspended today and then he had to promise not to break the twitter code of conduct again. Which was humiliating because he had done nothing wrong. So they restored the account but he was shamed by twitter not to mention anyone who might see his tweet, get offended and click “block” or “this is a spam mention”.

this theory also works on bitches getting out of jail time by wiring up men and putting them in jail
although the main dudes doing the bad shit never go to jail
just the non main players
men at the top not expendable
men below that are
it a fucked up world
I guess new chick and dude supposed to of stabbed a dude and robbed him
I got a call thinking it was me he he he
I could only be so lucky

Let me explain the survival of the fittest as explained by Herbert Spencer. What he was against was returning to an era where one’s social position was not related to whether or not someone produced something of value or not. An extreme example of this would be the Soviet Union where the politboro ran the country were at the top of the social hierarchy without having produced anything of value. This is what I mean when I discuss a regression from contract towards status – these are the “special ingredients” that Hanna Rosin fails to mention.

We’re all slaves to something, even the most wealthy and powerful. The biggest slaves are the ones who think they are free. Who are you a slave to? The only real freedom men have is picking their master.

Whore, you just described American women. The rest of the world views American women in general as fat, loudmouthed, over entitled, vulgar beasts who are good for nothing but a green card…maybe a shag if one is truly desperate.

Again, you’re projecting what is wrong with generic White American women and “whitewashed” women of color, and applying it to Black women as if they are uniquely atrocious. Few Black women in the world are anything close to fat. The ones who are fat are usually so on purpose for cultural reasons, over 40, or as is the case in the U.S. eating like generic White people.

If you’re part of the machine doing the corrupting, it’s kind of silly for you to be complaining about the results. If your culture was superior, others who adopted it should be improving, not degrading.

As it is, your culture, if you can call it that, is decadent and self destructive, and producing social movements such as feminism, which accelerate the descent into oblivion, and you’re condemning people for failing to thrive in it.

Now you figure I’m wrong because I don’t want to be like you.

I ask if you’re a serial killer because you seem awfully hell bent on presenting yourself as a psychopath who knows something must be wrong, but is literally incapable of learning anything from your past. You’re confused and have decided that a group who had fuck all to do with your crappy circumstances must be to blame, instead of looking for the head of the snake.

It is therefore inhumane for society to expect any one man to “settle down” with any one woman. Since a man is ‘expendable,’ his life is fleeting and he cannot be expected to be yoked with the dreams and aspirations of another. Polygamy is actually great for human genetics if you read up…monogamy is the ever-present “social construct” that the left loves to throw in rational people’s (read: men’s) faces.

Those facts are counterbalanced by healthy societies, which enforce paternal involvement. In the healthiest societies, paternal involvement is enforced through a trade off wherein the female offspring must be guaranteed to be the males, the female must be loyal, and the female is required to do household tasks.

In other words, there is a reason why men had to be PAID, in the form of dowries, to take women off of other men’s hands.

One day whorefinder is gonna be in a hospital bed and the nurse who walks through his door is gonna be a big fat black woman.
LOL

This is why I go easy on whorefinder. This world must be like hell for him; first he got a black president (that got reelected LOL). He can’t turn on the tee-vee without seeing some kind of subhuman…Then if he’s lucky, he hasta get old and toothless one day and be fed jello by Lawanda Page.

What a hellish existence… I should be a bigger man and leave him alone right?

Still, I suppose you’re right that he must live in hell. It is a hell of his own creation though, and I’d like to see him step out into the real world so he can stop wasting his energy on things that aren’t going to improve his life.

One day whorefinder is gonna be in a hospital bed and the nurse who walks through his door is gonna be a big fat black woman.
—-lol. Some affirmative action loud mouthed darkie who will do her job incorrectly and worse than everyone else. Happens all the time, boy.

This is why I go easy on whorefinder
—witness the african-american hamster on display.

he got a black president (that got reelected LOL).
–And is failing in every way. Demonstrating that you darkies really can’t run anything well.

It’s hilarious that you savages think that turning the country into a large version of Detroit is success. You forget so quickly that it was only 50 years ago you were back in line…where you belong. And history can turn on a dime, boy….

50 years ago, whore, your grandparents were raising a whore who’d sit her kid in front of a television and leave him there to stew in his dirty diapers.

Some people I know who are racists had mothers. They know the Egyptians were African and Asian. They just don’t like Africans or don’t want to mix with them.

You on the other hand, have to spin things so you can seem justified and superior because your mythological “race” is nicer.

Newsflash: you can’t stand shoulder to shoulder with the most pussy Russian I know, and the most gentle actual Caucasian I know would kill you and piss on your grave if you treated his sister the way you’re in the habit of treating so-called White women.

You’re a sorry excuse for “White”, as are most generic White Americans. Others feel some shame and some amusement that you think you’re as good as them.

They know the Egyptians were African and Asian. They just don’t like Africans or don’t want to mix with them.
—lmao. The Egyptians were not black, stupid.

You on the other hand, have to spin things so you can seem justified and superior because your mythological “race” is nicer.
—Correction: I correctly note that there is one race—-black—that by and large ruins everything, and is violent, stupid, and permanently uncivilized. I don’t think whites are superior to yellow or tan—but I do see that all the other races are superior to you dung-eating fools.

You’re a sorry excuse for “White”, as are most generic White Americans.
–An Aunti J? Pissing on whitey to cover her own savage ass? lol. Color me unsurprised.

Others feel…some amusement that you think you’re as good as them.
—I feel the same Cassandra-like amusement when people say that your “people” are equal to others.

The only ones in the position to ruin anything who aren’t educated or resourceful enough to join the real ruination (large corporations raping the Earth) are surviving poverty the same way everyone else does, just better at it and less happy being docile.

Are you saying that “your people” are superior because they’re statistically more docile?

Are you saying that your people are superior because they sit quietly in their not really but painted to be nicer ghettoes without making as much trouble?

That seems to be what you’re saying.

See, I don’t personally rely on statistics about people who aren’t even related to me to tell me whether or not I am worthy of something. I judge my worthiness for things by whether or not I have them. The way I prove myself worthy to have something is to get it.

Get it?

I don’t trust the statistics of agencies and governments who have proven time and again, that they don’t give a good god damn about any of us regardless of our color.

You’re the moron who does that. You decide what you are entitled to based on the likely doctored statistics about a mulitikult herd that you are assigned to so that the government and large corporations can convince you to sleep while they rape you.

So basically, this is our argument. You are a sheep in a herd arguing your superiority to me, and I am a human being who sees with her own eyes and does not feel compelled to bow to sheep who do as they’re told.

Like I said, you believe “your people” are entitled to more because you believe you are statistically nicer.

“We’re nice people. Make those other people slaves, and give us the profits,” which despite what some butt hurt Black nationalists may think, never happened ever in human history. Owners then like employers today, keep the profits and only pay even those they own or employ, the minimum they can get away with.

Whore, I do not live in the U.S. I am not on welfare. I own a business. I am not defending Black people. I do not know for certain that any of the government supplied statistics are true, so I do not rely on them to “prove” anything, especially not my worth as an individual.

You do use them to attempt to prove your superiority as an individual, and press the idea of the superiority of “your people”, most of whom you have nothing genetically in common with other than, perhaps, a gene that makes some in western Europe pale.

I’m assuming western Europe because eastern Europeans are generally less trusting of governments, and tend to pass that culturally to their children.

So you have nothing on me or any other African who has a job, owns a business, or simply does not live in a western country, which is most of us. All you have is what you’ve seen on television, and gleaned from statistics which may or may not be false or doctored or explained with falsehoods supplied by a government that wants to keep you dependent because of fear.

In the field of butt hurt and blame, you are equal to porch monkeys who sit on their ass complaining that the man is holding you down. The only difference is that your imaginary “the man” who is “ruining everything” is Black.

then the chicks who don’t fuck over dudes end up doing time
as the case with the chick who got the dude fired the system encourage woman to do whatever the fuck they want knowing they will get away with whatever it is
and if a woman doesn’t go along with the agenda of the system they get fucked
like chick getting k a week in child support and told the agency she didn’t need that much it was wrong to make dude pay that so they busted it down to 12 dollars a week

[CH: Proving me right is no accomplishment. Proving me wrong.. now there’s a test of one’s mettle.]

The MSM has basically lied to their readership about what really happened at the incident at PyCon, and now people (particularly feminists) are up in arms over something that didn’t even happen.

I guess it’s always this way though — any facts inconvenient to the leftist narrative are omitted and replaced by disinformation.

Usually though, we don’t get to see it all play out in real time.

[Yup . What we have all seen happen is a real time confirmation of the fundamental premise™. The way to fight the leftoids is to mock them so mercilessly and relentlessly that they never get the chance to reframe the media message to their advantage.]

I just posted a long comment, CH, that explains why you lost out on becoming part of the conversation yesterday. It isn’t only conspiracy but better marketing by the enemy in terms of trending terms. Your post was the best one on the topic but nobody and I mean nobody who wanted to read about the Adria Richards scandal yesterday decided to search for “Fundamental Premise”. You avoid using trending terms in order to be too cool by far. So you miss out on new readers.

Think about it. Even the post itself failed to use the words Sendgrid or Adria Richards when you should have known that those would be trending.

One good topic for a fresh post would be that, despite the MSM lying about what really happened with the Sendgrid and Playhaven firings, in the end it was the Anonymous organization that brought a corporation to its knees because they weren’t firing a feminist employee fast enough.

It means that Anonymous is on our side, for now at least.

That is good news because they would be more dangerous than the MSM if they were a bunch of manginas.

It seemed a few months ago like they were manginas. If you remember, Anonymous doxxed a Texas man who loved posting photos of teen girls on Reddit. One got the idea that Anonymous hated young anti-feminist Reddit types rather than incorporated that type.

The best way to influence the Anonymous organization is to make sure they become regular readers of this blog.

To do that, you will want to catch their interest and make them await new articles about themselves.

In a few days, a start-up in San Francisco will announce that they just hired Adria Richards as their company representative and they will stick a shiv in against Sendgrid and the “trolls” that got her fired. You know she’s also talking to lawyers like Gloria Alred also.

Do you want to react to or anticipate their unnecessary declaration of war?

I think this is what bothers me about some of the MRA websites that are out there. Men shouldn’t be vying with women to get in on the victimization train, nor whining about how it’s not fair that biology, and every aspect of human nature stemming from it, prioritizes women. Like, yeah? Does lowering yourself to the level of angry feminists make anything better?

All good solid points; but Im poolside with CH on this one. Its the virus that creates the antibody. You don’t hafta trade spit and grit on your enemy all the time… Their speech and actions, if truly unjust will generate the correct immune response in a HEALTHY host.

True. Many of those MRAs, while pursuing noble ends, attempt to copy the tactics of the victim groups in order to achieve their goals.

They fail to realize that those victim groups are dependent upon the idea of the boogy-man white male oppressor. The victim market is already saturated by women, gays, blacks, etc… all of whom rely on the trope of omnipresent white male oppression to fuel their victimization fantasies.

Thus any attempts of the white male to edge his way into victim-status are met with fierce resistance because it completely undermines the position of the perpetual victim classes.

One of the many reasons why CH’s strategy of relentless mockery is preferred to the victim grovelling that some MRAs practice.

The face of your oppressor that has been presented to you is a White male, and for quite some time, White Americans went along with it because it made them feel a part of a winning team. Despite it not adding a cent to any of their bank accounts, and even those who signed up to be enforcers for the system being grossly underpaid and usually undermanned for the task, they went along because it seemed like a good idea at the time. It gave them an illusion of privilege and status, and made them feel a little better about searching their sofas for pennies to get through the last couple of weeks of the month. They weren’t poor, they were “hardscrabble”.

But heavy hangs the crown, and even heavier when you aren’t wearing it but nearly the full weight of the people who are.

Except CH and GLPiggy helped lead the way in developing enough fury in the Adria Richards case that resulted in a corporation firing her for bringing their name into her ideological fight.

Her firing sends a message to feminists not to use their real names and company affiliations to advance a radical cause.

It also sent a warning across the bow that photo shaming is unacceptable.

And that can save a lot of men here in the future.

Any one of you could someday call a girl a bitch in public or just get on her bad side, either deliberately or accidentally.

Then she can just snap your photo with her smartphone or google glasses (you won’t even know she’s snapping your photo if she’s wearing those) and post it on twitter with the words “This tool was harassing me”.

Then her legions will doxx you and get you fired from wherever you work.

So a little organized MRA work is cool and CH is a leader in that.

The issue of Adria Richards is also not yet over. She can still sue Sendgrid and win. The enemy can still make a huge wave in the coming week where their goal will be to cow corporations into not ever firing another feminist again for any reason.

It does matter that Sendgrid’s actions are not universally condemned by a white knight and feminist Internet community.

Remember there are Alpha MRA’s and Beta MRA’s and Omega MRA’s.

And it is no small thing that the Anonymous Organization seemed to have been part of the MRA action this time and for the first time in history.

Anyhow, here is another reason why tech companies should not hire feminists in the first place. We all know by now that when the programmer who got fired cuz of Adria Richards said “I’d fork that guy’s repo” he was doing his job by referring to the desire to use the presenter’s source code to create a derivative product. The sexual connotation was entirely thought of by Adria’s dirty mind. He was totally innocent. I’m sure it was this, and not the fact that he chuckled sophomorically about big dongles, that caused her to stand up, smile, take his picture and destroy him.

Imagine Adria hanging around a company all day. All the programmers would be fired because she overheard them using terms like “continuous integration”, a “scrum pig”, a “burn down”, a “source repository”, a “daily standup.”

There’d be nobody left standing at the end of the day except Adria and the terrified CEO.

Which reminds me of the Twilight Zone episode “It’s a Good Life” with that kid who could destroy anyone for having not-nice thoughts.

Liam Nelsons latest flick was called “The Gray”. It is about an encounter between a pack of wolves and a small group of un-armed men deep in the wilderness of Alaska.
It is in many ways flawed. But I think that many who study here will effing get the point of it.

To those stating that women will “recognize” Game…that only happens when you use some hackneyed line that a million how-to manuals advise and is well known, or you awkwardly, oafishly blow yourself out with a BBB (Butthurt bitter beta) “neg” like “your hair is an ugly color. I could make it so much better,” sounding simultaneously mean and gay, and expect it to result in a number close.

Dolly R. Parton has always liked the Dick
She grew up in the deep Pentecostal-Holiness mileau. Which means she has always been aware of just how special and needfull a true Dick is.
The only thing better for a guy is to cross paths with is a strictly brought-up Catholic School Girl from maybe Pittsburg PA.. More than any other type of female, she will know just how nasty and forbidden and wanted is the right dick.

This Fundamental Premise is upheld by a plethora of venerable and ancient literary conventions. Start, for example, with Homers Iliad. You know, the story at the base of Western Civilization that explained how men would naturally kill and be killed just because there was a hot bitch somewhere in the picture.

Actually, I know Homer. He is a blind street crazyperson living down the street from me. He can easily be found, most nights, because there are only so many of those flamming, burning oil drum-stove-freak-magnets within my city limits.
He was also an early Internet Legend. His nym you will not hear from me.
Fights have happened. Once I went Postal Screaming — Do not Hit Him, He is Blind..
It worked. They let off.
That does not mean that he was not a complete asshole with smelly feet and a tendency to talk endlessly on about bullshit on many long distance cross-country trips in fast cars and pick-trucks with exotically loaded trailers to overseas racing events where everything was at stake and he never let me down. ..asshole.

The comparison of expendable sperm cells with valuable eggs cells ignores the rest of the cells produced and used in the entire reproductive system. While it’s true that men produce large quantities of sperm cells that are never used, so to do women produce large quantities of red blood cells that are never used: in the womb lining. And these red blood cells are shedded every month.

Now I haven’t done an economic analysis of ‘Male vs Female sex-cell production’ but I’d imagine that if you included the cells used in womb linings that are discharged every menstrual cycle, then the number of sex cells produced by men and women might be similar. And if that’s the case, then the analogy that women are more valuable than men because of scarcity is untrue, because it only focuses on sex cells and not ALL reproductive cells.

Here’s what I said:
‘The comparison of expendable sperm cells with valuable eggs cells ignores the rest of the cells produced and used in the entire reproductive system.’
You’re right that blood cells from a womb cannot be fertilised and grow into a child, but show me the child that gestated ‘without’ the aid of a womb and vagina and you might have a point.

Wombs, vaginas and penises are ALL required for insemination and fertilisation to take place. No womb, no penis = no child. That’s the premise. That’s what the basic argument ‘Lots of sperm = men are worthless & Few eggs = women are precious’ totally ignores.

All cells require nutrients and calories to exist (regardless of whether they are sex cells or reproductive organ cells), that’s what the focus should be on, not scarcity of a few selected cells.

The focus on sperm vs ovum ignores the environment which they work in, which is totally essential for fertilisation and gestation. The rest of the human body is not really an issue here. Meaning we can ignore it.. It’s reproduction that we’re concerned with. And if you want reproduction, then that means, vagina, penis, womb, urethra etc, all of which consume nutrients/calories. Whether the man is a 4’6” Tibetan monk who lives all his life in a cave (and consumes few calories), or the woman is a 6’6” Nordic athlete who spends all her time skiing (and hence consumes lots of calories) is neither here nor there. Reproductive cells are required for reproduction.

It is an issue because a healthy reproductive system requires a healthy body to live in that is at least a fully functioning torso and head. If you’re going to compare cells, then the whole animal must be taken into account. Men, from whom sperm come (pardon the pun), have more cells and most are not Tibetan monks, nor are most women Nordic skiiers. There are not enough of either to be relevant in this.

If you’re taking the whole body into account, then you shouldn’t stop there but take the whole ecosystem into account (all bodies need to live in an ecosystem); and if you’re going to include the ecosystem, then you need to include the planet; and if you’re going to include the planet, then you need the solar system; and ad infinitum. Which is of course ridiculous.

My only point is that reducing the entire male and female sense of worth down to very specific sex cells that can only function with the rest of the reproductive system (but the human is dependent on the reproductive system to live) is short-sighted because it igores rest of the cells that they need to fulfill their role.

Homer lost his sight gradually over time.
Like evertyhing else; a continuum is the main explanation of truth…
When he was an early Internet Legend he could stil see the fukin red screen screen …well
enough

And the freakes/volk will stil need somekind of flesh to burn, Nicht Var?

On twitter, it is clear the reason why it might seem that the pro Adria Richards forces are winning, is bcuz all you need to do to get a tweet top billing for any particular moderately trending term is to have it retweeted 4 times.

That is ridiculously easy to do. You just need 4 people mildly coordinating with each other with no need of even knowing each other personally.

A retweeted post is automatically twice as important as one that nobody felt was worth retweeting at all.

Just a couple men retweeting each other’s posts could put a pro Sendgrid tweet to the top. That would not be hard.

The feminists do that with ease and that is why it appears that “everyone on twitter is pro Adria Richards”

If you click on “All” instead of “Top” you will see the majority of tweets are against her feminist rantings, but those people are not favoriting and retweeting each other the way the feminists do. So the feminist tweets win “top” billing.

Heartiste and GLPiggy can retweet each others posts now and then and move what each other is saying to the top for trending terms. This would be ridiculously easy.

The feminists and their lackies understand marketing and programming algorithms better than their enemies, even though it is so easy to understand the concepts. That’s too bad because it would be only too easy for those of us with twitter accounts to just favorite and retweet some of the better ones we agree with.

This is like when the most ambitious girls in kindergarten learned to count to twenty faster than most boys did. It was not because of any intellectual superiority. They were just focussed more about something that seemed so unimportant to boys.

That’s fucking mint right there… You should have this set as the first thing that every beta boy reads when coming to this page. Followed by a few other key points that form the foundation of the Chateau.