Nikita Dzhigurda got into an altercation with the YouTube Koschevnikovi

The flamboyant artist was strongly disagree with the host of the show “live”. Throughout the program, Nikita Dzhigurda periodically engage in polemics with Boris by Koschevnikovi, and that, in turn, had to taste the outrageous behavior of celebrities.

The scandals around the name of Nikita Dzhigurda continues. Edition of the program “live” and host Boris korchevnikov closely watching events in the life of a showman. On Tuesday, April 18, broadcast transmission again raised the subject of a scandalous divorce of the actor and figure skater Marina Anisina those, as well as the wills of the deceased girlfriend of celebrities Ludmila Bratash.

Tantric mistress Dzhigurda said about their secret relationship

Throughout the transfer of Nikita Dzhigurda is trying to prove his innocence, which caused conflicting emotions among the guests in the Studio. They did not understand why Marina Anisina have granted his face. According to the document, which the chair demonstrated on a talk show, he has the right to represent the interests of the skater, to enter into agreements and transactions, and to dispose of property in her name. The sportswoman has not been in contact with program staff.

The former Director of the showman Antonina Savrasov-Abramova believes that he forged the will of Ludmila Bratash because of problems with money. Nikita himself her words are not confirmed. The artist has a notarized copy of the original document. Experts and guests on skeptical and even aggressive took the statements of the stars, what made him stand in a defensive position.

The appearance of Antonina had caused Nikita negative reaction. The artist believes that Savrasov-Abramova deceiving the public. To counter the hum of voices that arose in the Studio, the showman began to use profanity. “You do not honor what you speak here now,” said the leader of the program.

Throughout the broadcast of Nikita Dzhigurda periodically engage in polemics with Boris by Koschevnikovi. Sometimes a man got up from his seat, to personally contact was present in the Studio. In addition, the artist came to Korchevnikov to spill a few words. In a rush of emotion out of the chair was also starting to focus on those points that seemed important to him, taking on the responsibilities of the leader.

“Let me decide who should speak and who is not… You’ve already gagged me, and it ended badly. Let’s just do this. Problems? I’m not afraid of problems” – these words Boris retorted saying outrageous star.

Nevertheless, the army continued to stick to their line, expressing disagreement with the statements Savrasova-Abramova. The woman continues to categorically disagree with the celebrity. “The original will was allegedly stolen. So under what circumstances stolen? I don’t believe it,” she said.

“Specifically she dyes her hair in red color, it is an imitation Anisina those. She’s waiting for the Chair… It’s a woman’s revenge” – these words explain the behavior of Savrasova-Abramova a new Director of the artist Ivan Makarov.

Apparently, Nikita Dzhigurda did not quite like the turnover has taken the debate on the air. In turn, host periodically “pin up” star and the other guests, sometimes too fiercely defended his point of view. At some point, one of the experts started too closely to communicate with the artist. “What are you doing? Are you flirting Morrice?” – asked the presenter and expressed the assumption that the flamboyant entertainer was not at that age to flirt with everyone. In response, Nikita decided to show others what great physical shape he is in, and stripped to the waist, much to the delight of some members of the fairer sex.

In the final show of confrontation between Nikita Dzhigurda and the leading program took an unexpected turn. The showman was not happy with the statements of the guests who have accused him of the forgery of the will for selfish purposes. “You work for the Antichrist, kid,” said the man Korchevnikov, paronomasia in his words, “I work for the truth.” After a few minutes of the chair even cross over the opponent.

However, in the end, the men decided to embrace in a sign of reconciliation, showing that their debate arose not because of personal enmity, and as a result of disagreements on a number of points.