AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVEAnd They Call It 'Women's Liberation'How Women Were Lured Out of the Home in the USA by AREEBA bint KHALIDFrom the 1800s to the present day, family life in the West has remarkably changed. While the West calls this change part of the women's freedom movement, a look at history may show otherwise.

America before the 1800s was a farming country and ninety percent of the population lived and worked on private farms. Households were mainly self-sufficient ? nearly everything needed was produced in thehouse. The few things that could not be produced at home were boughtfrom local craftsmen.

Some other things, especially imports from Europe, were bought from stores. Males would take care of the fields and females would take care of the home. In addition, they would engage in spinning, knitting, weaving, and taking care of the farm animals.

Industrial Revolution

The Industrial Revolution, which began around the early 1800s, brought a major change to this way of life. In 1807, in the wake of the war between Great Britain and France, President Jefferson signed the Embargo Act, which stopped all trade between Europe and America.

The act meant that European goods would no longer be available in the US and Americans would have to produce them. One major European import to America was cloth, and so merchants used this opportunity to create a cloth industry in America.

In 1814, Francis Cabot Lowell, a man from Boston opened the first modern factory. Work here was to be done way faster than before. Instead of manually making things in houses, things were to be made at higher speeds in a factory, and all stages of the work were to be completed under the same roof.

Now what Lowell needed were workers. He found out that women, especially unmarried daughters of the farmers, were more economical to use in labor than men. They were also more willing to work as hired people in factories.

But Lowell had to make working outside of the home acceptable in a society which was not used to it. He assured parents that their daughters would be taken care of and kept under discipline. And he built a boarding community where the women workers lived and worked together.

Soon after, more and more factories emerged across America. Factory owners followed Lowell's example of hiring unmarried women. By 1850most of the country's goods were made in factories. As the production of goods moved from the country to the city, people too moved from the country to the city.

For money to be earned, people had to leave their homes. When womenworked on the farm, it was always possible to combine work and family. When work for women moved outside the home, however, the only women who could follow it were those without family responsibilities or those who had no husband or income. Likewise, the only women who could take care of their families were the ones who didn't have work.

This working out of the home became a part of life for unmarried women.They would work until their marriage. But as time passed, women found family life interfering with their work life, and instead of viewing working out of the home as optional, they viewed family life as such. Many women started delaying marriage even more, and some decided to stay single.

Married women, however, stayed home and dedicated their time to theirchildren. Now that there wasn't any farm work to do, women had evenmore time to spend with the children. In 1900 less than about 5.6% of married women worked outside. If a married woman were to work, itwould be considered that her husband was invalid or that she was poor.

World War I

The first major entry of married women into the workforce came duringWorld War I in 1914. Men went to fight the war and the country needed workers to take over the jobs they left behind.

Unmarried women were not sufficient for the labor needs, so employers started to invite married women, too, to work. By 1919, 25% of the women in the workforce were married. But this was only the beginning.

Another change World War I brought was the entry of women into thearmy. About 13,000 women enlisted in the US Navy, mostly doing clerical work ? the first women in US history to be admitted to full military rank.

The Great Depression

The Great Depression came in the 1930s. The unemployment rate climbed from 3.2% in 1929 to 23.6% in 1932. Jobs became scarce for skilled people and men. Fathers went to search for jobs. Some, in despair, deserted their families. The responsibility of earning fell on mothers in many families.

Most women and children, however, found jobs more easily than men,because of the segregation of work categories for men and women.Although 80% of men during the Great Depression opposed their wives'entering the workforce under any circumstances, economic factors made it necessary for the women to work.

Hours were long and pay was low. Twenty percent of white women were in the workforce.

World War II

World War II came in the early 1940s. Men were drafted to fight, and America needed workers and supplies. Again, employers looked towards women for labor. Unmarried and married women were invited to work, as had been done during World War I.

But still, public opinion was generally against the working of married women. The media and the government started a fierce propaganda campaign to change this opinion. The federal government told women that victory could not be achieved without their entry into the workforce. Working was considered part of being a good citizen, a working wife was a patriotic person.

The government founded the Magazine Bureau in 1942. The Bureaupublished Magazine War Guide, a guide which told magazines whichthemes stories they should cover each month to aid war propaganda.For September 1943, the theme was "Women at Work." The slogan for this was "The More Women at Work the Sooner We Win."

Magazines developed stories that glorified and promoted the placement of women in untraditional jobs where workers were needed. The idea was that if smaller, unexciting jobs were portrayed as attractive and noble, more women would join the workforce.

The media created "Rosie the Riveter," a mythical character to encourage women into the workforce. Rosie was portrayed as a patriotic woman, a hero for all American women. "All the day long, Whether rain or shine, She's a part of the assembly line. She's making history, Working for victory, Rosie the Riveter ? There's something true about, Red, white, and blue about, Rosie the Riveter."

The propaganda efforts worked. More than six million women joined the workforce during the war, the majority of them married women. In 1940, before the war, only 36% of women workers were married. By 1945, after the war, 50% of women workers were married. The middle-class taboo against a working wife had been repealed.

Post-World War II

The 1950s marked an era of prosperity in the lives of American families. Men returned from the war and needed jobs. Once again, the government and media got together to steer the opinion of the public. This time, however, they encouraged women to return home, which shows that women were brought out not for their freedom but because workers were needed.

But this effort was not as successful and was abandoned quickly. First, women from lower economic ranks had to remain in the workforce because of economic necessity. And second, there came the rise of aconsumer culture.

The baby boom took place during the 1950s as well. Women who returned home dedicated their lives once again to their children.

But around the same time an important change had come in the American life. This was the spread of television. By 1960, 90% of the population owned at least one set. Families would gather around the screen for entertainment. In the early days, everything including commercials was watched with great interest.

Most middle-class families could not afford the goods that televisiondeclared necessary to maintain or enhance the quality of life with onepaycheck alone. Many women returned to work in order to live according to "the American standard of living," whatever that meantto them.

The number of American women in the workforce from 1940 to 1950increased by nine percent. From 1930 to 1940 there had only been athree-percent increase.

The Effects

As mothers returned to work, television became the most important caretaker of a child. Children in the 1950s spent most of their non-sleeping hours in front of the television screen.

In 1940, less than 8.6% of mothers with children under eighteen worked. By 1987, 60.2% of women with children under eighteen were working.

As wives assumed larger roles in their family's financial support, they felt justified in demanding that husbands perform more child care and housework.

Across the years, divorce rates doubled reaching a level where at least one out of two marriages was expected to end in divorce. Marriage rates and birthrates declined. The number of single parent families rapidly increased. People grew unhappy with their lives, when compared to the lives of people before television.

Women working affected society in many different ways. The first and most important of these was that children with working mothers were left alone without the care of a mother. As the number of working women increased, the number of children growing up unsupervised increased and with this, increased crime among teens.

Since most women placed their career ahead of family life, family life was greatly affected since unmarried women were generally able to make more money than married ones. For example, according to a study by a Harvard economist, women physicians who were unmarried and had no children earned thirteen percent more per year than those who were married and fifteen percent more than those with children.

Today

The majority of women still work at the lower levels of the economicpyramid. Most are employed in clerical positions, factory work, retail sales, or service jobs. Around 50% of the workforce is female. While about 78% of all cashiers and 99% of all secretaries today are female, only 31% of managers and administrators are female. Equality in the workplace has been a mirage but it has conned millions of women into leaving their homes and destroying the family structure.

It was only when economic or political factors made it necessary to get more workers that women were called to work. The Industrial Revolution, the Great Depression, and the World Wars, all the major events which increased the proportion of women workers, were times when the capitalists required more workers in order to be successful in their plans and so they used women.

The move of women from home to the public workforce has been gradual. First poor women went. Then unmarried women. Then married women without children. Then married women without young children. And then, all women.

The same thing can be seen to be happening in developing countries around the world, as the West spreads its propaganda of freedom for women to work. The results of this move will probably be the same, too.

Maltese society is seeing a low fertility rate and a sharp rise in the number of women who are working, a parliamentary committee has been told.The subject was discussed at a meeting of the Family Affairs Committee in the context of a discussion on priorities in the work-life balance.

The Director of the University Centre for Family Studies, Prof. Angela Abela, said that a silent revolution is taking place in Malta. Although only 40 per cent of women in Malta are in employment, the pattern is changing radically according to different age groups. The female work participation rate for the 25 to 29 years group had increased by 14 per cent from 56 per cent of the female working population in 2001 to 70 per cent in 2010. This increase was the steepest in all EU member states over the same period, meaning that the country was shifting from a traditional society to one of working couples.The increase in female work participation was also much in evidence in the 30 to 34 year groups from 49 to 60 per cent and among the 35 to 39 year group from 27 to 50 per cent. The statistics, she said, were the result of research made by 39 members of diverse professions. The research also showed that Labour MP Justyne Caruana said that studies showed that if the working female participation rate in Malta increased to 100 per cent, this would lead to a 50 per cent increase in the GDP.Continuing, Prof Abela said that part-time employment among men in Malta increased from 4.4 per cent in 2000 to five per cent in 2010 when the EU average decreased by 1.5 per cent. Another study found that 52 per cent of the Maltese work more than nine hours daily with 13 per cent of them working over 11 hours. Some 65 percent continued working at home. Prof. Abela said that this showed that striking a work-life balance was an area of concern.She also referred to low fertility rates in Malta at 1.4 per cent, adding that maternity leave was a need and had to be even longer.NSO statistics showed 27 per cent of births in Malta were outside marriageresearch showed that many parents did not have a second child because of stress they suffered in coping with their family responsibilities. Committee chairman Jean-Pierre Farrugia said that there was the need to increase the birth rate. Prof. Abela said this demographic and economic challenge had to be addressed urgently because the country was already late on such an issue. The low birth rate did not only concern women but also the economy.Prof. Abela underlined that family policies should target all types of family in Malta and should give priority to issues of poverty, mental health, disability and low-educated couplesIt is the low IQ women that are breeding most in Malta.High IQs prefer their profession to bearing even one child.This is a dysgenic disaster in the making - low breeding.

And meanwhile, primitive Africans breed like chimps at our hospital - at our expense.They breed because We pay for their feckless fecundity.We do this through the morbidity of our Christian disease of the mind.

Not only that: but stupid Maltese women actually adopt Africans!They even baby sit Africans, while their mothers work: and rob Maltese of scarce jobs.This is the lunacy of present day society.

Sunday, December 20, 2015, 00:21Cameron: I want women troops front line ready in a year

Women could be allowed to fight on the front line within the year as part of the greatest shake-up of the British military in its recent history.

David Cameron has asked the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to be ready to welcome women into close combat roles by the end of 2016.

The long-mooted move would speed up the implementation of a review into the policy when it concludes before the summer.

The Prime Minister said: "The Defence Secretary (Michael Fallon) and I are united in wanting to see all roles in our Armed Forces opened up to women in 2016. We've already lifted a number of barriers in our Armed Forces with the introduction of female submariners and women reaching the highest ranks in all services.

"We should finish the job next year and open up ground combat roles to women."

A review paper was published in December 2014 and as a result, further research is under way looking at the physiological demands on those carrying out ground combat roles.

The current research programme is expected to deliver an initial report in mid-2016.

A decision to open up all roles to women would put the UK alongside other nations such as Australia - which has legislated for this - and the US, which earlier this month announced it would open all jobs in combat roles to women, following three years of research.

The Prime Minister's intervention would see women begin training for these roles as early as autumn next year.

The government is already putting in place procedures to ensure women are aware and able to take up the new opportunities, including working with recruitment offices organisations.

Currently more than 80% of jobs across the Armed Forces are open to women, who make up more than 10% of the military's manpower.

Jobs on the front line were opened to women two decades ago, notably in the artillery, engineers and for combat medics. The new changes would predominantly apply to those roles in the Infantry, Royal Marines, and Royal Armoured Corps and The Royal Air Force Regiment.

----------------

Diabolically Jewish!Another attack on the White Race: placing the Bearers of The Race in grave peril.Diminishing our White population further.

Exactly! We have an Effeminate Culture.Our Politics are Feminine and we Europeans get elbowed aside by decidedly Masculine invaders.They hold us in contempt for our weakness.

We of Imperium Europa will again instill Masculine Values, Virtues into the White Man.We will be merciless and stamp out the Invaders without pity.And We will root out those Cultural Traitors who have feminized us, disarmed us: placed our children as sacrificial animals to the Lie of Equality.

What a difference this woman journalist, Iben Thranholm to our pathetic, Jesus Poisoned Qormijja: with her Equality, pity, altruism and Love for Everyone, oozing out of her - a National Embarrassment. We need honest women, strong Women who encourage our Menfolk to FIGHT!

And WHO has feminized our Culture, destroyed Manhood since WW2?It's the JEWS, stupid - Them controlling the Media, Hollywood, Newspapers and TV...Them injecting us with The Jesus Poison, that has drowned Kristos within 50 years.

We of Imperium Europa are determined to change this Judaized, Feminized EU, led by Schultz and his Tribe of Rodents in Human Form.We will again Inspire the Europid to take up arms and stand his ground.And within a short time: We will clean up Europe of All Illegal Invaders and the Traitors within.

The fertility rate in Malta is slightly below the EU average and continuing to decline, according to data issued today by Eurostat.It shows that the fertility rate in Malta in 2014 was 1.42, compared to 1.48 in 2001. The EU average in 2014 was 1.58.A fertility rate of around 2.1 live births per woman is considered to be the replacement level in developed countries, Eurostat said. In other words, that is the average number of live births per woman required to keep the population size constant in the absence of inward or outward migration.The highest fertility rate was recorded in France and the lowest in Portugal....

----------------

So, Maltese fertility rate keeps falling - while Malta's population increases, year after year.Why? Because the Muslims and the trousered apes (Illegal African Immigrants) breed like rabbits.Just like France and Sweden: they breed, we abort.

A Dysgenic Disaster planned by the Jews, those Rodents in Human Form.They want to wipe us off the face of the planet - an implacable Hatred towards us, primarily.They, Them know that only We stand between Them and global rule.

And the same with millions of Mexicans flooding America, with Whites a minority in just a few years. And the same with Canada, a White country just 50 years ago - betrayed by Trudeau. And Australia betrayed by Bob Hawke - and now even New Zealand is turning Multicultural.

Every White Country is being invaded, flooded, taken over - suffering this Racial onslought.Not Japan or China, or India or Indonesia or Nigeria or Tanzania - only THE WHITE RACE IS FACING EXTINCTION.

And behind it all: THEM!And We can never find ourselves, regain our courage to boot All Invaders out of our Territories: unless We extirpate this malevolent Tribe of Rodents in Human Form.

I refer to the comments made by Polish parliamentarian Janusz Korwin-Mikke in the European Parliament (March 2). My initial reaction was one of utter amazement. However, on reflection I am not surprised. Having lived on this earth for decades and rubbed shoulders with men in a wide range of career situations, in a number of countries, I claim some insight into what constitutes a male mentality.Indeed, having researched over several years the career of one of the most reported on men in history, namely, the Prophet Muhammed, I can look into the mental framework of Korwin-Mikke.I find such striking similarity between the words of Korwin-Mikke and the words of Prophet Muhammed, that the situation is uncanny. Yet, these two men are separated by 1,400 years. They are products of two very different cultures: Muhammed, in the deserts of Arabia and Korwin-Mikke a politician in Poland. Two men, products of two different environments expressing the same thoughts on women. That must be indicative of something specific.Korwin-Mikke said “Women are weaker, smaller and less intelligent”. As for Prophet Muhammed, as narrated by Abu Said Al-Khudri: “Once Allah’s Messenger [Muhammad] went out to the Musalla [place of prayer] (to offer the prayer) of `Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, “O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women).”They asked, “Why is it so, O Allah’s Messenger?” He replied, “You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.”By keeping women ignorant, dependent and subjugated, men are better able to extract that which they desperately need, when and as they want it, namely sexThe women asked, “O Allah’s Messenger! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?” He said, “Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?” They replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?” The women replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her religion.”Also as narrated by Abu Said Al-Khudri, the Prophet said: “Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half that of a man?” The women said, “Yes.” He said, “This is because of the deficiency of a woman’s mind.”An answer might be found in a lecture delivered by Saudi cleric Abd Al-Aziz Al-Fawzan, aired on Al-Majd TV (June 11, 2007), in which he said: it has been shown that the twisted nature of women stems from their very creation.This is how Allah wanted them to be.He explained further that, he (the husband) should tolerate her slips and errors, and put up with all the silly ignorant things she might say, because this constitutes part of the nature of her creation and that “When a man calls his wife to fulfil his needs, she must go to him, even if she is busy with the oven”, that is, work that cannot be neglected, she must leave the oven and go to her husband. Another Hadith says she must go to him even on the back of a camel.My conclusion is that by keeping women ignorant, dependent and subjugated, men are better able to extract that which they desperately need, when and as they want it, namely sex.Does this demonstrate that sex, not intelligence rules the male mentality? For it is well known that women hold intelligence-demanding careers such as scientists, medical doctors, lawyers, engineers and business entrepreneurs, and that equal pay for work of equal value is a policy that is undisputed in a democratic society.This requires acknowledgement of rational argument as a tool and a rejection of female bondage, both fundamental to democracy. Yet both of which are rejected by Korwin-Mikke since he rates European culture as a lower civilisation than that in Muslim countries.

Write a letter of protest to the Petitions Committee of the European Parliament asking for the highest reprimand against Korwin-Mikke, at: The Chairman, European Parliament, Petitions Committee, Rue Wiertz, B-1047 Brussels, Belgium.Joan Ribi is an international environmental scientist and member of the Political Studies Association, UK.

https://www.facebook.com/joan.ribiNo info, no photos - just moaning about Jewish treasures that were lost in Iraq - (through a Jewish instigated senseless war on behalf of Israhell).

--------------

There's a woman for you - pressing for "the highest reprimand" - meaning expulsion from the European Parliament. Only a woman, or a feminised Christian Cleric, or the Hypocritical Humanists and the Greens, could come up with this. This (((J))) proves Korwin-Mikke right!

MEP who said women are 'weaker, less intelligent' suspendedPolish politician had causes uproar in parliament

The European Parliament has suspended a Polish politician for 10 days after he said during a debate that women should earn less than men because they are weaker, smaller and less intelligent.Janusz Korwin-Mikke will be suspended from parliamentary activities for 10 days, forfeit politicians' daily subsistence allowance for 30 days and be banned from representing the legislature for a year, parliament president Antonio Tajani said.

During a March 1 debate on the gender pay gap, Mr Korwin-Mikke, a radical right-winger who leads a marginal party, said: "Of course women must earn less than men because they are weaker, they are smaller, they are less intelligent."

Mr Tajani said he "will not tolerate such behaviour" and added that "by offending all women, (Mr Korwin-Mikke) displayed contempt for our most fundamental values".

------------

This is the Jewish, tyrannical EU Parliament, displaying utter disregard and contempt for Freedom of Expression. Quashing the right of Korwin-Mikke to express a perfectly respectable opinion, supported by facts. This is the EU that We are determined to wrest from Jewish control and turn into Nova Europa.

Read posts 1 & 4

Antonio Taljani is an opportunist Christian Cretin, changing parties like musical chairs. He started his political career with the Italian Monarchist Movement - ie believing in absolute Monarchy, and La Legge Sabauda that excludes women to become Queens and rule alone (unlike Britain).

Our women, whom We hold in awe as child bearers of the Race. Our women, who the Jews want to defile through miscegenation with primitive Blacks. Our women: Anglo Saxons, Teutons, Slavs and Latins - the four cousin sub-species of the White Race.