The British Intelligence then offered the Beatles a deal that they should have refused. It was one that they would soon regret and that they would regret for the rest of their lives. It was an offer to take Phil Ackril and, through the magic of massive plastic surgery, they would change him into Paul McCartney. However, they must do one thing: Never tell--and if they do tell, they would be under penalty of death, meaning that they would promptly be killed.

They were also offered to have a replacement for Brian Epstein, but one who was not a Jew, but they refused that offer. Instead, they opted to fake his death (meaning to fake the METHOD of his death), by announcing that because John had announced that the Beatles would no longer be touring, he committed suicide.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1069180

I wonder why British Intelligence would be interested in the continuity of the Beatles.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27370797

The social engineers are very interested in the music kids listen to. I'm not sure why, but they are.

The British Intelligence then offered the Beatles a deal that they should have refused. It was one that they would soon regret and that they would regret for the rest of their lives. It was an offer to take Phil Ackril and, through the magic of massive plastic surgery, they would change him into Paul McCartney. However, they must do one thing: Never tell--and if they do tell, they would be under penalty of death, meaning that they would promptly be killed.

They were also offered to have a replacement for Brian Epstein, but one who was not a Jew, but they refused that offer. Instead, they opted to fake his death (meaning to fake the METHOD of his death), by announcing that because John had announced that the Beatles would no longer be touring, he committed suicide.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1069180

I wonder why British Intelligence would be interested in the continuity of the Beatles.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27370797

The social engineers are very interested in the music kids listen to. I'm not sure why, but they are.

Nah..I can tell by the way he plays and sings.. body movements.I was 10 years old in '66 and a working musician..Also, as a bassist/guitarist.. I studied his playing, closely..Same dude I watched live on Ed Sullivan..

First of all: the current day Paul McCartney is the same as the one that has always been in the Beatles, and the guy that was born with that name. Simple.

But second: A weak aspect of almost all conspiracy-theories on GLP. The 'why' question. A question most people who believe in these kind of conspiracies ain't able to answer.

Too put it simple: WHY would the beatles continue with a fake-Paul when the 'first' had died? Shouldn't it be ore easy and logical to tell that Paul had died, and that the Beatles would disband or go on without him?

WHY would the Beatles continue with a 'fake Paul'? whats the use? why lie about it? what's the bigger / satanic / illuminati scheme around it?

As long as you aint able to answer those logical questions, and use your common sense, any debate about 'fake paul' is simply illogical and farfetched.

That 'why'-question / the lack of logical / rational motive, is the major downfall of most conspiracy-theories, and the reason why I can't take people defending these kind of theories seriously.

Call me sheeple, call me a shill...but as long as many of you keep reasoning in such a twisted way, the majority of the people you call 'sheeple' have more insight and common sense then many of you.

Nah..I can tell by the way he plays and sings.. body movements.I was 10 years old in '66 and a working musician..Also, as a bassist/guitarist.. I studied his playing, closely..Same dude I watched live on Ed Sullivan..

First of all: the current day Paul McCartney is the same as the one that has always been in the Beatles, and the guy that was born with that name. Simple.

But second: A weak aspect of almost all conspiracy-theories on GLP. The 'why' question. A question most people who believe in these kind of conspiracies ain't able to answer.

Too put it simple: WHY would the beatles continue with a fake-Paul when the 'first' had died? Shouldn't it be ore easy and logical to tell that Paul had died, and that the Beatles would disband or go on without him?

WHY would the Beatles continue with a 'fake Paul'? whats the use? why lie about it? what's the bigger / satanic / illuminati scheme around it?

As long as you aint able to answer those logical questions, and use your common sense, any debate about 'fake paul' is simply illogical and farfetched.

That 'why'-question / the lack of logical / rational motive, is the major downfall of most conspiracy-theories, and the reason why I can't take people defending these kind of theories seriously.

Call me sheeple, call me a shill...but as long as many of you keep reasoning in such a twisted way, the majority of the people you call 'sheeple' have more insight and common sense then many of you.

Quoting: Riverman 1487773

To find out 'WHY' - as with everything....especially 'conspiracies'....follow the money!!

No OTHER BAND EVER would stop touring after just 4 years - especially as they had just gained HUGE WORLDWIDE RECOGNITION....(Normally bands continue touring for decades after gaining global notoriety after a mere year!)

Now THAT certainly makes me question WHY!

Only logical reasoning points to something happening that seriously impeded continuing with live performances...like ...perhaps...one of them died!

Learn about body languange...i mean seriously research it and then re-watch the documentary and you'll see it with new eyes.

After 30 odd yrs of thinking paul was paul....i now realise the truth. It's glaringly obvious!

I didn't read all 20 pages, but I have a question I hope someone could ancwer. If Paul was replaced, wouldn't his wife Linda Eastman have noticed, and objected?

I always thought his choice of second wife was odd, that strange amputee woman.

Quoting: Let Freedom Ring

When Paul "died" in 1966 he was dating actress Jane Asher, and I believe they may have even been engaged. They were quite the celebrity couple. Shortly after the introduction of "Faul" [if you believe it, that is] they broke up and "Faul" was dating Linda Eastman [who is Jewish].

The first is it could be true that due to the huge amounts of money being generated by the Beatlemania wave sweeping the western world that Paul died and was replaced. If only to keep the cash flowing. Yet, look at the Elvis industry.

The Beatles were huge, so yeah it is possible??? But think Elvis.

Secondly, to find a gifted left hander who has a similar voice, manerisms and looks, irrespective of plastic surgery, hair transplanting etc is really stretching it.

I've known many people to change abruptly after serious accidents and think this is more than likely then case.

Not to get in the way of a juicy web urban legend conspiracy, of course!