JCPS attorney Byron Leet wants the current plan to stay in place, saying it would be logistically impossible to change to a neighborhood schools system.

“However you determine it, it can't happen because of serious overcrowding that would happen in certain areas of the county. That would then present the question, what are you going to do about the people who get bumped out of their nearest school?” Leet said.

On the other side of the case, attorney Teddy Gordon argued the current JCPS student assignment plan is a violation of state law and should be completely gutted.

The current law was created by the Kentucky legislature in 1990. It says, "children are to be enrolled in the school nearest their home … "

The core of the debate is the word "enroll" versus the role "attend.” Gordon said the two words mean different things.

“When I enrolled in the University of Kentucky, no one ever imagined I'd be sent to attend UofL or Transylvania. I digress, but that is the interpretation JCPS wants to give you,” Gordon said.

The attorney representing the other side said that the current busing plan creates nothing but problems.

The court did not set a time frame on when it will come back with a final decision.

The Supreme Court has a few option on what it can do, it can side with JCPS and dismiss the entire case or portions of it, or they can uphold an appellate court ruling that the district must institute a neighborhood assignment plan.