Sharks Director of Rugby Gary Gold had some interesting things to say about the new Super Rugby format in an interview he gave earlier in the week.

Speaking to Warren Fortune of Rugby365, Gold said: “The only thing I will say about it is that when you play sports at the highest level, all you really want is a level playing field and this competition does not provide you with that.”

Gold is, of course, referring to the several imbalances in the competition structure, where certain teams enjoy an extra home game in a particular year. There is also the small matter of whether you play against the stronger Kiwi, or somewhat weaker Australian teams in cross-conference fixtures. The Sharks have the short end of both sticks this year, with 8 away games and matches against all five New Zealand franchises to contend with.

Another point that irks the coach is a frankly “absurd” schedule that sees the Sharks play three games in three vastly different places within the space of just over a fortnight. A tough three-game tour to New Zealand is followed immediately by a home-game against last season’s runners-up (the Hurricanes), with an away game against los Jaguares in Argentina a week later. “I don’t think you understand the toll it has on the bodies when you fly east to west, recover from jetlag, play a game and then fly east to west again for another game,” says Gold of the scheduling disaster. “We have to plan for that and we are going to plan for that. It’s a big challenge, but next year will be a different kettle of fish.”

The Sharks have a big squad, with significant depth in the high-attrition areas like the front row and loose trio. Gold and his fellow coaches will need to look at a fair bit of rotation and would hopefully be able to take a squad to Argentina that contains a fair bit of fresh blood, after others in the group have been thoroughly tested (and exhausted) by their trip to New Zealand.

244 Comments

Does not help that we are a new team… eish.. however next year another team should get that draw and we should have an easier ride with more experience. That is the positive. The negative is… no point complaining pre-season. We want positives coming from the camp and if that is the only comments so far from Gary Gold then…. well then we in deep trouble

Comment 1, posted at 15.01.16 10:08:55 by ebenp

ja must say I totally agree with him!!!!!!! I must say I did not read the whole article but from what I heard I do not see to much wrong with what Gold said. It’s going to be tuff and I would like to see the NZ or OZ teams do something like that without commenting on it!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment 2, posted at 15.01.16 10:10:36 by JD

As I stated in the other thread, I just hope more people in the SA rugby scene follow suit and speak out against this daft format.

Comment 3, posted at 15.01.16 10:15:18 by vanmartin

I really dont see anything wrong with what he said as its what we have all thought for ages. Im also glad he hasnt come out (yet) and said the Sharks are going to this and that this year in terms of attacking play etc. Let the play speak for itself on the field. He of course will in time have to answer questions posed to him by the media, which as a job requirement he has to answer.Hence you often see the cliches dished out by coaches as they really dont want to lay it all out by they are required to answer questions. I just dont tend to read too much into news articles…sensible doesnt sell only sensational does. Something to keep in mind

Comment 4, posted at 15.01.16 10:29:02 by SheldonK

Gold is right, even if a bit late with the criticism.
I remember commenting on that crazy travelling schedule which totally slants the playing field away from the unfortunate team that has to contend with it. Its enough to derail a team having a good season and its enough to bury a team struggling to find its feet.

Comment 5, posted at 15.01.16 10:29:54 by Salmonoid the Subtle

Let’s be honest, if the All blacks had that itinerary, do you think they would be moaning? We have already lost an important battle without even starting the campaign.

That said yes it’s not ideal, and yes the new format sux (big time), and yes I won’t be connecting my DSTV to watch this obsured competition.

Indeed, and the bar is not set very high to start out with. I’ve just recently seen on twitter how Rob had to point out mistakes in both a Sharks tweet and SA Rugby Mag article.

Comment 7, posted at 15.01.16 10:40:54 by vanmartin

No one is saying the format is fine but to raise this at this stage is just poor from Gold. Just pathetic. He could have said something like: the fact that we have to play all the NZ teams has given us more motivation than we had. It has pulled the team together and made things easier at training as everyone knows exactly what we are up against. We are also using this as an advantage as we can spend the bulk of our training preparing against one playing style. The plans we have put together to counter the travelling are A, B and C. This statement would have inspired much confidence from fans like me. For 2016 Sharks season, what benefit will his statement bring?? Nothing. Just shut up and be a professional Gold.

Comment 8, posted at 15.01.16 10:40:58 by GreatSharksays

@Uli Boelie (Comment 6) : Difficult to make that call as the All Blacks don’t play Super Rugby but if the New Zealand unions started getting raw deals in Super Rugby (which they never have in my recollection), I’d imagine they’d eventually make their grievances known seeing as they are a competent lot in general. They’d be negligent not to do so.

@vanmartin (Comment 9) : My point is professionalism, confidence and being positive. The Crusaders had a terrible schedule the same year their stadium got whacked by that earth quake. Did they moan before each match? NO.

Comment 11, posted at 15.01.16 10:47:42 by Uli Boelie

@Uli Boelie (Comment 11) : Well it’s kind of pointless complaining about the shifting of tectonic plates, isn’t it? We can lay a lot of blame at SANZAR’s door but I’m about 80% certain they had nothing to do with that one.

As pointed out in the other thread, if professionalism (ie not complaining about the new format) brought us this format, then professionalism be damned.

Comment 12, posted at 15.01.16 10:54:04 by vanmartin

@vanmartin (Comment 9) : Operative word – eventually. My understanding of that is they would put plans in place, give it their all and then after the competition raise it. Not before even one ball has been kicked and when nothing can be done about. He is feeling the pressure and is therefore trying to condition us. Simple as that.

@Uli Boelie (Comment 11) : Agree. NZ teams dont need to complaint because they play the game to end 1st or 2nd on log. Then logistics are not an issue. Anyway hope its just a smoke screen by Gold….

Comment 16, posted at 15.01.16 11:02:44 by ebenp

@vanmartin (Comment 12) : Fact is we sitting in this format, and we playing it, nothing is going to chance it unless there is a club strike similar to what the French did to the Heineken Cup.

Comment 17, posted at 15.01.16 11:06:59 by Uli Boelie

I really fail to see the big issue here? Next thing we will complain about Gold’s haircut and how it negatively affects the team. I mean seriously! He was asked a question and he answered it honestly. If you honestly think that his answer affects team morale that much then the team is a bunch of wimps that were gonna get beat anyway! I do not understand how answering a question posed by the media is not professional? Not being professional would be just walking out and not answering. Are we that bored and negative that we blowing this so much out of proportion…

Comment 18, posted at 15.01.16 11:10:31 by SheldonK

@Uli Boelie (Comment 17) : You are right, but change has to start somewhere.

Comment 19, posted at 15.01.16 11:11:27 by Southern_Shark

@GreatSharksays (Comment 13) : So your issue is the timing of the announcement. This is where we differ then. I don’t mind it – the sooner it’s said, the better. Wish he’d said during the preseason already.

@Uli Boelie (Comment 17) : No argument there. We now have to play the hand we’ve been dealt but that doesn’t mean the Sharks need to accept it without making their feelings heard on the matter. Get the grievances out there so it can have an effect on the future of the tournament.

This idea that it’s impolite or even weak to speak out against maladministration (which seems to be a running theme in rugby) seems to be pervasive in South Africa.

All ready posted this on another article but it actually should be on this one.
In 23 days the Sharks will play 4 games on 3 Continents without playing two consecutive games on the same continent NZ – SA – Arg – SA!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No other team in the competition (that I could see) has something similar but please tell me if another team in SA travels to NZ/OZ plays 3 games then travels back to SA play one game, then travel to Arg. to play one game and then return to SA (again) to play.
Also like was said in comment 4 “sensible doesnt sell only sensational does. Something to keep in mind”. Just saw it again when Amla resigned as captain of the Protea test team. Heading of newspaper posters on street corners was “Amla vat sy goed en loop” (translated to “Amla takes his things and walk”) and not just simply Amla resigns as test captain.

Comment 22, posted at 15.01.16 11:23:29 by JD

@SheldonK (Comment 18) : lots of people complaining what he said to Rugby365 I’m personally more worried about what he’s saying to the players and the fact is non of us know (or those who do is not telling)!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment 23, posted at 15.01.16 11:27:09 by JD

@JD (Comment 23) : Its really not rocket science what will be said to players. Remember these players are adults, some young adults, but all can read and write and all have smart phones etc so are fully aware of the situation. Talk will just be that is it what it is and focus will be 1 game at a time. Thats why its good to have senior players in the squad to help the younger guys with their doubt and concerns. So yes players will also be questioned about the comp format and tough travel schedule and being professionals they will need to answer. And the best answer is normally the honest one.

Comment 24, posted at 15.01.16 11:35:01 by SheldonK

So the concencus of opinion is Gold is right,we haven’t a snow balls chance in the competition,lets lie on our backs and take it like men.
Wish that he told me that before I shelled out 6 and a half K for season tickets.
If the competition is so skewed why did we agree to take part.
Funny that the golfers playing all around the world,playing four day tournaments ,are able to adapt to different time zones weekly

Comment 25, posted at 15.01.16 11:41:51 by The hound

@The hound (Comment 25) : I think i must have a computer virus as the part where Gold says we dont have a snowballs chance didnt show on my side. Maybe i should restart the thing and see. U reading waaay to much into this

Comment 26, posted at 15.01.16 11:51:05 by SheldonK

@The hound (Comment 25) : two things
1 Gold said it’s going to be tough he did not say the season is over and they will not be trying to win the competition
2 ja and golf is a contact sport where the players tackle the living snot out of each other?!?! Don’t think even a golfer will be traveling like the Sharks will this year.
Must say this schedule reminds me a lot of the play offs when the Sharks played in OZ then against the Stromers in SA and back to NZ to play against the Chiefs in the final.

@The hound (Comment 25) : must say great to hear you got season tickets. Very jealous!!!!!! Hope it’s a good season and you see some great Sharks rugby!!!!

Comment 29, posted at 15.01.16 11:56:26 by JD

@SheldonK (Comment 26) : I think the point you are missing is that Gary just read the schedule this week,or thats how it comes across .Hell he should have spoken up when the rooster first came out.
He seriously needs to work on his P.R.,his job is to get the people of Durban fired up about this team and attending in the numbers we used to enjoy.
He basically trotted out the old Province line,we stuffed this year but boy watch us next year.

Comment 30, posted at 15.01.16 11:58:25 by The hound

@Southern_Shark (Comment 15) : Nope. Not all. This talks directly to what Mitchell said about our lack of preparedness and dropping of standards. I’m very sure that the team is preparing accordingly and is highly motivated by their tough schedule. So Gold should have said just that. What he said and the timing of it leaves so many questions in my mind. Is he already making excuses? Does he not have faith in the squad? Does he have no faith in his coaching and medical team, or in his ability? In his position he has to send the correct message to the public. We have dwindling crowds and had the worst season last year. What will happen is if the team starts to lose a few games in a row? The fans will go back to that interview and say: Gold gave up back in Jan so why bother going to the stadium when the coach has told the world that we should rather focus on next year??? Why would I renew my season ticket after such a comment from the head coach? The expectations from fans is at an all time low….this simply drops that expectation even further. Get John Smit to handle the interviews from now on. Hence Jake made sure that he only speaks to the media in pre-season. Can’t be sending mixed messages and leaving fans confused. Gary has just given the players a reason to accept poor results therefore the dropping of standards. Good preparation should mitigate this rough schedule to a certain extent.

Comment 31, posted at 15.01.16 12:02:33 by GreatSharksays

@GreatSharksays (Comment 31) : Very well put,I’d say Q.E.D to this argument.

Comment 32, posted at 15.01.16 12:07:36 by The hound

@GreatSharksays (Comment 31) : So if John Smit, or anyone else besides GG does press conferences, you and the other pessimists are not going to say that he’s hiding from his responsibility? Pfft!

Comment 33, posted at 15.01.16 12:15:04 by the ko

@The hound (Comment 30) : Im sure he has probably been getting pissed on expensive champagne in the boardroom with Smit and only came out now…he isnt sure who this Robert fellow is with the whistle either. Lets not forget he was asked the question about the competition and he answered. its not like he organised a press conference to state his views. Im glad he was honest rather than spilling out some sugar coating rubbish that anyone can see right through.

Comment 34, posted at 15.01.16 12:16:57 by SheldonK

@the ko (Comment 33) : I can’t help you with comprehension. I said the team is probably preparing adequately for this rough schedule. So GG should have stated just that. It sends the right message. The fact that we are having this debate means he sent a confusing message which can be interpreted as an excuse. John knows how to convey the message without sending mixed messages to shareholders (us). Clear or are you still lost?

Comment 35, posted at 15.01.16 12:24:25 by GreatSharksays

@the ko (Comment 33) : probably!!!!!!!!! I’m very close to a point of stopping to comment on any discussions on Gold as some people seems to have decided he’s dammed if he does and dammed if he doesn’t and will never change there mind until he leaves!!!!!!!!!!

Comment 36, posted at 15.01.16 12:28:32 by JD

I’m going to break ranks here and not focus on Golds comments, but agree that this is a stupidpid system and something must be done about it.

My fear is that something will only be done when supersport (dstv) subscriptions and season ticket holder numbers fall drastically. Currently I’m quilty of both.

Comment 37, posted at 15.01.16 12:29:32 by stevovo

@JD (Comment 36) : Correct Sir. The theme is he is wrong no matter what. Only Mitchell is right.

Comment 38, posted at 15.01.16 12:30:14 by SheldonK

@GreatSharksays (Comment 35) : How is the message confusing? Gary doesn’t like the format. Neither do most of us.

Comment 39, posted at 15.01.16 12:30:47 by vanmartin

@SheldonK (Comment 38) : What a difference a month makes,seems you are finally over your Heinke Meyer crush and have moved onto to another hero with clay feet.

Comment 40, posted at 15.01.16 12:37:27 by The hound

@The hound (Comment 40) : Yeh i must be. What other reason would there be for me thinking there is nothing wrong Gold giving an honest answer (the same one we all agree with) to a question he was asked. Seems i missed the hidden meaning and agenda

@SheldonK (Comment 41) : maybe if you read it backwards the hidden meaning and agenda will be revealed !!!!!!!!!!

Comment 43, posted at 15.01.16 12:50:45 by JD

@JD (Comment 43) : Dammit. They really should tell u these things up front before we read an article. In other news the Stormers havnt unveiled their captain yet…seems the coach doesnt trust anyone in the team. But maybe im reading too much into it

Comment 44, posted at 15.01.16 12:59:55 by SheldonK

@SheldonK (Comment 44) : It’s not a train smash. Believe me. Eddie Jones and England,, they are playing in 3 weeks time and no captain revealed.

Comment 45, posted at 15.01.16 13:06:00 by GreatSharksays

@GreatSharksays (Comment 45) : I was saying it in jest and trying to show how u can read too much into something. Absolutely no reason why a captain cant be announced when the match day side is announced.

Comment 46, posted at 15.01.16 13:08:38 by SheldonK

@GreatSharksays (Comment 31) : You are taking what he said out of context and blowing it out of proportion, fueled by your own personal dislike of him.

Copy, paste to the Hound.

Comment 47, posted at 15.01.16 13:55:09 by Southern_Shark

Whilst talking about coaching staff…anyone know who will look after the Sharks in the beginning stages of the CC? And when does that portion actually start?

Comment 48, posted at 15.01.16 13:55:33 by SheldonK

@SheldonK (Comment 41) : Thats where you are confused,an honest answer is Nick Mallett complaining that the test ticket prices were too high,a negative answer is Gold whinging that he has been shafted before a ball has been kicked.
Look what Mallett’s honesty did for him.
Simple story if you don’t want to be judged for what you say in the press,then don’t say it.
The corridors of rugby are littered with arrogant,mis informed and moronic quotes from coaches.
Jake White,”not one Irish player would make the Bok Team” and we get shafted by the Irish the next day.

Comment 49, posted at 15.01.16 13:59:42 by The hound

@SheldonK (Comment 48) : it starts in April and Michael Horak will be the head coach.

Comment 50, posted at 15.01.16 14:07:22 by robdylan

@robdylan (Comment 50) : Ah cool. Thanks Rob…should be an interesting team the Sharks field

Comment 51, posted at 15.01.16 14:16:28 by SheldonK

@SheldonK (Comment 44) : @robdylan (Comment 50) : oh hell no!!!!!!!!! Now the bitching will be starting all over again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment 52, posted at 15.01.16 14:16:49 by JD

Guys – not to make a big thing about this, but I think some of you are really going overboard and giving Gold a pretty hard time – unfairly so.

He was asked a question about the competition format and he gave an honest answer. He thinks the format is absurd – and guess what? So do the rest of us. Any format that’s so complicated that the broadcaster is forced to release videos attempting to explain it is by definition a stupid one. Now why are we allowed to say this about the format, but when Gold does, he’s accused of complaining?

He points out in the interview that while the Sharks have a bad draw this year, they will have a good one next year. I don’t read this as him complaining about the Sharks’ lot, but more pointing out that the draw is very likely to skew the results and final standings in a particular year. In fact, I spoke to him briefly this morning and he says he views this year’s tough draw as a good thing – a challenge and a way to motivate his team. He’s telling the guys they need to “man up and face” what they’ve been given, which i think is a very good message.

So give him a break. Let’s see how the boys go on the field and if the rugby is shit, by all means blame the coach. But right now, a lot of this criticism is petty and more than a little mean-spirited.

Get behind the Sharks already.

Comment 53, posted at 15.01.16 14:19:27 by robdylan

@The hound (Comment 49) : Not sure how Gold’s answer wasnt honest? And how it differs from exactly what has been said on this blog many many times. I get your hate for the guy, and thats your opinion but you are seriously blowing this way out of proportion.

@robdylan (Comment 55) : There could be quite an overflow from super rugby squad guys though as well. They could use it to stay match fit and compete for starting spots

Comment 56, posted at 15.01.16 14:36:16 by SheldonK

@SheldonK (Comment 51) : it could be a very young team as the end of April beginning of May traveling might just deplete the reserves a bit!!!!!!!

Comment 57, posted at 15.01.16 14:36:42 by JD

@JD (Comment 57) : Thats a good point too. Hoping they do also look at a few youngsters to supplement those travel squads though

Comment 58, posted at 15.01.16 14:52:39 by SheldonK

@robdylan (Comment 53) : Why couldn’t he have given that answer to Rugby365? A website with a much bugger reach than Sharksworld. Cheers guys.

Comment 59, posted at 15.01.16 14:59:06 by GreatSharksays

@SheldonK (Comment 54) : Hate is a strong word,rather see it as disdain.
I never thought this guy was Sharks material,and each day he seems to confirm it.
I sincerely hope he proves me wrong,and if he does I will be the first to acknowledge it.
Till he does though I am not going to give him any credit till he actually earns it.

Comment 60, posted at 15.01.16 15:02:40 by The hound

@robdylan (Comment 53) : thanks Rob and now we also know the message the players are getting and ja it will not be easy but I really hope the Sharks will do well and win Super rugby this year!!!!!!!!!

Comment 61, posted at 15.01.16 15:09:18 by JD

@The hound (Comment 60) : I still think its hate but anyway. Its your call not to give the guy a chance but u must then also be appreciative that some people are willing to give him a chance and would rather judge after than before. I also think its only fair to judge a guy on facts not made up assumptions and on things he cannot control. So yes I too will judge his coaching after the fact. But i can have some perspective. Im not going to blame Gold for the fact that it may rain on match day

Comment 62, posted at 15.01.16 15:16:33 by SheldonK

@GreatSharksays (Comment 59) : maybe he did and they just decided not tot use it we just don’t know!!!!!!!! I personally take anything I read on internet and news papers with a pinch of salt except for Sharksworld as I know articles is not written for ratings but for truth!!!!!!!!!

Comment 63, posted at 15.01.16 15:19:22 by JD

@SheldonK (Comment 62) : Sure I judge him soley on his performance since he arrived at the Sharks.
Worst Super rugby performance in years and the first time in ages that we failed to reach the Currie Cup semis.
You feel thats O.K. fine,but my expectations and standards are a little higher than that.

Comment 64, posted at 15.01.16 15:22:24 by The hound

@The hound (Comment 64) : And the actual players performances had nothing to do with it? Im definitely not saying he is blameless but as i said perspective. He seems to have brought in some exciting players and coaching staff to aide him in 2016 so yes im willing to let him have a go and see. Remember last year there was only 1 super rugby winning coach- the rest all lost. Doesnt mean they are all shite

Comment 65, posted at 15.01.16 15:27:04 by SheldonK

@GreatSharksays (Comment 59) : Maybe he did and Rugby 365 did not choose to include that part of his answer in the article. You do realize they don’t include every word he says in an interview in the final article?

If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a thousand times: This competition structure is simply and ludicrously daft!

Comment 68, posted at 15.01.16 16:05:44 by pastorshark

@ebenp (Comment 1) : To be fair to Gary Gold, it is certainly not the only thing he has said in interviews…however, this sort of comments obviously gets impressive voyager miles because it is a little bit controversial. Well, I don’t see it as controversial, I see it as entirely accurate, but you get the point…

Guys, surely you must realise that geography alone makes it far easier for New Zealand and more difficult for South African sides in this competition. If you then add a competition structure that makes that difference even bigger, then obviously no New Zealand side is EVER going to complain about that…and in my view more South African sides should. If you think New Zealand sides would not complain about this if the shoe was on the other foot, then:
a) You don’t know human nature very well…
b) You just don’t remember how much New Zealand sides whinge whenever anything doesn’t go their way…I know that doesn’t often happen, but when it does there are hardly bigger whingers in the game…just revisit some press conferences after they have been knocked out of world cups to refresh your memories…

@SheldonK (Comment 56) : they want to minimse that. They are serious about developing the youngsters, so I wouldn’t expect to see too many Super Rugby fringe players in Currie Cup first round.

Bear in mind that for franchise teams, it’s a meaningless competition, so there is absolutely zero benefit to fielding your strongest team. They will occasionally let a senior play there if he needs game time after rehab, but for the most part, it’s a comp for the 21 year olds.

I just had a good look at the other draws…my word, the Stormers have – using a translation of a German turn of phrase – fallen with their arses right in the butter. Ideal draw for them. I know I’ve said this before, but jeepers this tournament structure is daft!!

@robdylan (Comment 86) : ja listening to the interview for me it’s clear they know it will be difficult but they’re going to prepare for it and will give it their all.
Also the order of the interview in the sound piece is not the same as in the article. He started off saying it will be hard and the draw is stupid but in the end he said they will be preparing for it with is positive!!!!

@GreatSharksays (Comment 8) : yeah I agree. This serves nothing for the Sharks. But it does get an excuse in early and that’s why I think Gold has said it. Not good.

Comment 91, posted at 16.01.16 00:04:47 by Gold_Must_Fall

the margins are sometimes so small.had an opportunity to beat the cheetahs in opening game of ’15 sr,but ball was lost forward/grounded short(?).had an opportunity to beat the lions in jhb,but the the penalty kick was missed.and remember the debacle re: the refereeing in the waratahs vs sharks game?the sharks were by no means perfect or on the receiving end of contentious refereeing in every game.sometimes the kick goes over and the ball sticks.and the ref (and tmo) get the decisions right. that can make all the difference.

Comment 92, posted at 16.01.16 09:33:00 by 50shadesofshark

The brutal truth here is that Gold patently obviously never understood the new format till now
Although this is unforgivable coming from a man in his position,it is fairly indicative of the level of contempt and arrogance the owners and managers of this tournament hold for all its stakeholders.
This holds true for the broadcasters and in fact the unions themselves.
How can you just disseminate a currently successful tournament and go into the new season without having the courtesy of explaining the changes to the paying public.
If it was ever done,it missed me,Supersport missed me,The Sharks missed me,Saru missed me,Sanzar missed me.
I still don’t understand it and we are weeks away from kick off.
If I was a sponsor anyway involved in this tournament,I’d be seriously thinking about new ways to spend my money.

Comment 93, posted at 16.01.16 10:00:52 by The hound

This used to be a simple tournament even though it was always a mutation.
Every one plays everyone once on a league basis,one year we play at home next year we play away.
The difference was the top four initially then the top six went into a knockout competition.
Imagine the Premier League agreeing to that.
The winner should have been the team that topped the league.
But greed has always been the driving force in this competition.

Comment 94, posted at 16.01.16 10:07:06 by The hound

@The hound (Comment 94): no local derbies.superrugby should be about playing against the provincial teams of the other participating countries.top 4 go into semi’s.

Comment 95, posted at 16.01.16 10:38:30 by 50shadesofshark

Whoever was the bright spark who decided we all wanted to see more local derbies was patently wrong. I get way more excited when the Sharks play foreign teams. That is the true litmus test of my team’s strength. That is what used to make the old competition “super”. Now this year we skip all Aussie teams? The mind boggles.

Comment 96, posted at 16.01.16 10:43:50 by Gold_Must_Fall

@50shadesofshark (Comment 95) : Why even have semis and a final thats the way you play a knockout competition.not a league competition.

@The hound (Comment 93) : I think your conclusion that Gold obviously only understood the format now is a little bit of a stretch. I reckon the more obvious conclusion is that he (and others) has (have) always thought so, but did not say anything about it until a reporter asked. When he was asked he gave an honest answer. Does that not make more sense? I do agree with your criticism of the tournament…and I agree with Gary’s criticism of the tournament. I also don’t think the criticism by Gold was in any way the main point of the interview with him…I think the reporter turned it into a main point…

Comment 99, posted at 16.01.16 11:45:53 by pastorshark

Does this mean the Sharks already have their “backs to the wall”? Hahahaha

Comment 100, posted at 16.01.16 11:57:14 by Gold_Must_Fall

Totally of topic I see Andries Bekker played 7 for Kobe against Panasonic. Must say he’s taking a lot of contact and not looking bad.

Comment 101, posted at 16.01.16 12:24:46 by JD

@pastorshark (Comment 99) : Have the Sharks at any point attempted to explain the tournament to the faithful,if so please tell me where.
Did they at any stage try to assure us of why they agreed to the changes,which I hope to hell they were consulted on before they agreed to take part.
Or do we still operate on the old Louis Luyt paternalism type of system where SARU dictates and we all jump to do their bidding

Comment 102, posted at 16.01.16 12:35:54 by The hound

en Bakker is af beseer!!!!

Comment 103, posted at 16.01.16 12:37:06 by JD

@vanmartin (Comment 9) : And there you get to the heart of things. NZ have always run sanzar and will never get a raw deal. In fact most decisions always seem to benefit them in the end. Our beloved saru are just passengers and can be kept happy with a few extra Rands in the pocket. It’s long been time for a revolution. Hoskins and his friends need to fall.

Comment 104, posted at 16.01.16 13:37:32 by coolfusion

@The hound (Comment 102) : I am not sitting on any of these boards, but I am very sure that each change in the competition does not have to be approved by the boards of all 15 (now 18) unions that participate in the tournament. SANZAAR does that all on their own. So if you want someone to blame for this daft concept I think you need to focus on SARU rather than the Sharks…

Comment 105, posted at 16.01.16 14:55:44 by pastorshark

@The hound (Comment 102) : There are constant explanations of the competition on supersport and all over the web! You must have missed those. The Sharks have had an explanation on their website, complete with a link to a video clip using the Sharks as an example. Here is the article:http://sharksrugby.co.za/super-rugby-2016/
If you want to keep saying negative things about the Sharks, you’re more than welcome to…I suggest, though, that you pick other topics – the rants in your last comment seem a bit misdirected…

Comment 106, posted at 16.01.16 15:04:32 by pastorshark

@The hound (Comment 102) : Sorry, I got out of the wrong side of bed this morning…

Comment 107, posted at 16.01.16 15:07:21 by pastorshark

@pastorshark (Comment 107) : So you understand the competition,well you probably have divine inspiration on your side,so you one up on me.

Comment 108, posted at 16.01.16 15:10:56 by The hound

@The hound (Comment 108) : Understanding the competition is not really that difficult…understanding how anyone thought it was a good idea is faaaar more difficult and beyond my meagre abilities, divine inspiration or not…

Comment 109, posted at 16.01.16 15:18:58 by pastorshark

@The hound (Comment 108) : You point about who exactly approved this nonsense has intrigued me and I’m busy google-ing it. From what I can find so far I can see the Aussies and New Zealanders talk a lot about workshops with all their unions to discuss it. I see none of that from SARU…only that SARU says it was the only option up for debate that met their main aim of adding a sixth team. At the end of the day that is probably the root of this whole affair. Does anyone know how this decision was run past our unions? Does anyone know if any of our unions objected? Did SARU give them that possibility? I reckon if SARU approves it, it is not really realistic (and probably not even possible) for individual to withdraw from the comp in objection…

Comment 110, posted at 16.01.16 15:23:52 by pastorshark

In other news: Damn, Proteas, that was embarrassing…

Comment 111, posted at 16.01.16 16:04:50 by pastorshark

Saru are passengers on that board. They wouldn’t fight for our best interests even if they could.

@coolfusion (Comment 112) : I’m not so sure that SARU are passengers in SANZAAR…Aus and NZ wanted the format to stay as it was but SARU managed to convince them otherwise. I’m just not convinced that what SARU has as its main priorities is necessarily what is best for SA rugby…anyway, what can we do?

To win the thing, you have to get into the play-offs and win every game from there on.

Pretty simple really.

So what, if all paths to the play-offs are not equal. Teams who didn’t make it due to a more difficult path were obviously not good enough and teams who made it because of an easy path won’t get much further anyway.

The format only becomes an issue if one is concerned about the legitimacy log positions 7 through 18 and if that is your main concern, then you are perhaps the daft one.

Comment 118, posted at 16.01.16 19:22:57 by fyndraai

On a different note. Any one have an idea what the preseason will look like and dates?

Comment 119, posted at 16.01.16 21:33:17 by coolfusion

@fyndraai (Comment 118) : I can see how that can be a silver lining for a team in rebuild to take on the better teams and temper their steel. As Rob said this is a rebuild year so I’m not expecting spectacular winning records I am eager to see how we improve aspects of our game and local teams just don’t offer the kind of intense and diverse play we need for that kind of test. To be honest even our struggling sharks last year managed to beat local contenders or come very close. We need a proper barometer of our progress.

Comment 120, posted at 16.01.16 21:39:14 by coolfusion

@50shadesofshark (Comment 116) : They will probably only participate from a team perspective not a governing body perspective?

Comment 121, posted at 16.01.16 21:43:09 by coolfusion

@coolfusion (Comment 119) : toulon on the 5th of feb amd toulouse on the 11th of feb.

@pastorshark (Comment 85) : so this nonsense of a disgrace continues,I just have a question-what happems after say three rounds and the Kings can’t field a team,then what?this could still blow up in SARU face

Comment 130, posted at 17.01.16 20:07:15 by benji

@benji (Comment 130) : ja it’s a sad situation!!!! Just hope SARU has the balls to act against the people that caused this to happen!!!!

Comment 131, posted at 17.01.16 22:06:41 by JD

Of topic again was watching the Toulon vs Wasps game today. Just after Toulon scored the winning try commentators had a very nice saying: “bring your game not your name” and must say I hope that’s what the senior players do!!!!!!

Comment 132, posted at 17.01.16 22:16:02 by JD

@JD (Comment 131) : But aren’t SARU the people that did cause this to happen?

Comment 133, posted at 17.01.16 22:21:27 by pastorshark

@pastorshark (Comment 133) : EP rugby had time to get sponsors and players in place but ran into financial trouble. SARU must do a full audit/investigation to see how and why things went wrong and then must act against the guilty parties in either EP rugby and/or SARU!!!

Comment 134, posted at 17.01.16 22:37:44 by JD

@JD (Comment 134) : Yes surely the problems need to be fixed and a proper foundation for franchise rugby be installed before a dysfunctional provincial side gets thrust into the top level of rugby such as SR,clueless incopetents the lot

Comment 135, posted at 17.01.16 22:53:20 by benji

@benji (Comment 135) : ja we can discuss this whole saga for months on end but it would not change what is wrong now. That’s why I just hope for a full investigation to why the Kings ran into problems to pay players as they had lots of time to get their things sorted before this years Super rugby!!!

@JD (Comment 131) : This is like the drunk driver that walks away from the accident and the innocent family in the other car that die. Guys like Cheeky will be sheltered by friends. Don’t hold your breath…

Comment 138, posted at 18.01.16 07:07:01 by coolfusion

@JD (Comment 134) : Pastor has a point. Would be better for an independent body to do the audit and investigation. May even show some involvement from saru side.

Comment 139, posted at 18.01.16 07:10:21 by coolfusion

@JD (Comment 134) : I think its a case of 2 things there to be honest. On the one hand i dont think anyone was interested in stepping up to sponsor the Kings. And then the little money they did have was not used correctly by those in charge.

Comment 140, posted at 18.01.16 07:52:01 by SheldonK

@coolfusion (Comment 138) : valid point you make but one can hope that justice will be done!!!!!!!!!!

Comment 141, posted at 18.01.16 08:07:49 by JD

@SheldonK (Comment 140) : they had two years to get a sponsor and anyway if they did not get a sponsor they should have warned the players and staff that they had money problems and could not pay their salaries.

Comment 142, posted at 18.01.16 08:12:34 by JD

@JD (Comment 142) : Yeh look as i said i think they mismanaged the money they did have. But it is also tough if nobody wants to sponsor you…its not like you can force them to. SARu fought to have the Kings included but i just wonder how much of a fight they gave in helping get a sponsor

Comment 143, posted at 18.01.16 08:39:20 by SheldonK

@SheldonK (Comment 143) : yes that’s true SARU should have helped. What we do not know is what the original agreement was and if SARU agreed to help them or not. Fact is now it’s a big mess and for SA rugby’s sake I really hope they can sort it out before the tournament starts!!!!!!!!

Comment 144, posted at 18.01.16 09:07:52 by JD

@JD (Comment 144) : I very much doubt there was any formal agreement for SARU to help in any financial way. So yes now there is a big mess. And only way to fix it for long term sustainability is to secure 1 or 2 big sponsors- which even now under SARU control doesnt seem likely

Comment 145, posted at 18.01.16 09:42:05 by SheldonK

frans steyn looking in good condition (108kg).watching the japanese league 1st semi.playing at fullback.would like to have had him still involved at the sharks.

Comment 146, posted at 18.01.16 11:00:30 by 50shadesofshark

2 excellent back-of-the-hand passes in the tackle for the thoshiba try.first by frans steyn to kahui and then kahiu to the try scorer.

Comment 147, posted at 18.01.16 11:06:12 by 50shadesofshark

@50shadesofshark (Comment 147) : Interesting you say FB. He has said he prefers centre and the Sharks and SA rugby are often heavily criticised for moving players around and ‘ruining’ their careers. Yet here he is at 15 and excelling. I do like him at 15 just by the way.

Comment 148, posted at 18.01.16 11:17:22 by SheldonK

@SheldonK (Comment 148) : tend to agree re: fullback.andre joubert said he thinks frans steryn should play at fullback.think that was the consensus after he spent some time at murray mexted’s rugby academy in nz ,too.came back to the sharks and made his debut at fullback vs cheetahs.

Comment 149, posted at 18.01.16 11:27:14 by 50shadesofshark

@SheldonK (Comment 148) : frans steyn played flyhalf at grey college (if not mistaken),but inside centre for sa u19s?played for the sa u19s for 2 years whilst still at school.

Comment 150, posted at 18.01.16 11:30:04 by 50shadesofshark

@50shadesofshark (Comment 150) : Im really not sure where he played his school rugby to be honest. Think he spent time at both 10 and 15. I just like the way he plays at 15…think because of his size he too often gets told to just bash it up from 12. I think while he is a capable 10 he often gets shut down there but if can attack from out wide he is dangerous. But he seems lost to Sharks rugby and SA rugby

Comment 151, posted at 18.01.16 11:37:34 by SheldonK

@SheldonK (Comment 151) : which is a shame,because the younger frans steyn had stepping skills.until he was told to change his game (and physique)?

Comment 152, posted at 18.01.16 11:40:07 by 50shadesofshark

@50shadesofshark (Comment 152) : I think the physique became a problem in France…and then instead of slimming down he was asked to bulk up for that role. So he seems to have slimmed down again to cope with the quick pace of that rugby. Will be interesting to see how he goes at Montpelier and where he plays

Comment 153, posted at 18.01.16 11:44:04 by SheldonK

@SheldonK (Comment 153) : richard kahui is all action!scored a hat-trick.still dangerous on attack and smashed gomouro in defence.

Comment 154, posted at 18.01.16 11:50:20 by 50shadesofshark

@50shadesofshark (Comment 154) : He is a very good player. only picked late in his career for the All Blacks but a very very useful guy to have

@50shadesofshark (Comment 156) : he is not over the hill by any means but he was always going to go overseas after the 2011 RWC and was only picked just before that. Thats what i meant by late in career

Comment 157, posted at 18.01.16 12:15:49 by SheldonK

@JD (Comment 134) : @benji (Comment 135) : Is anyone convinced that this will really happen? I’m not. My point is that SARU itself is ultimately responsible for the current situation by their own deliberate action and/or inaction. In what world will SARU ever then investigate that? Not in mine…

Comment 158, posted at 18.01.16 12:18:15 by pastorshark

@pastorshark (Comment 158) : Whether the investigation happens or not im not really bothered as it wont fix the past. What im interested to see is what is put in place so that the same is not repeated in 2017…and well for the remainder of 2016

Comment 159, posted at 18.01.16 12:21:51 by SheldonK

@SheldonK (Comment 159) : Yup…though, based on the rule of thumb that the best predictor for future behaviour is past behaviour, I am in no way filled with any confidence that even that will happen…

Comment 160, posted at 18.01.16 12:32:59 by pastorshark

@pastorshark (Comment 160) : Yeh look evidence does point to that. Im just hoping for the sake of SA rugby effective plans etc are put in place. At the end of the day the Kings are here and not going anywhere…so lets get them functioning rather than being a pit where players careers die

All I can say the lot at SARU who negotiated on behalf of the SA unions must be the biggest pushovers ever. Not a fan of Gold, but I fully agree with him – this Super Rubbish sucks.

Comment 163, posted at 18.01.16 13:00:05 by Bokhoring

@Bokhoring (Comment 163) : I agree, but what goes on at SARU means F-all to me,my question still is who represented the Sharks in all this,somebody must have,at some stage a piece of paper had to be signed.
Who was the turkey who led the Sharks into this slaughter,and I don’t buy that the Unions have no say,and are expected to do exactly what they are todd to do.
Somebody accepted that we play 7 at home and 8 away.
Who ever it was is a rank amateur and should be called out to explain this to,the season ticket holders,the sponsors and the fans.

Comment 164, posted at 18.01.16 13:27:39 by The hound

@SheldonK (Comment 145) : ja can’t see any sponsor willing to have their name linked to the mess that’s currently going on there!!!!!!!!!

@The hound (Comment 164) : oh come on boet get real!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! whenever a draw for a competition is made no team will ever sign for playing more away games than how games that’s way teams have no say in the determining of the draw. It is done on a rotation base this year you will play 8 home and 7 away and next year you will play 7 home and 8 away.
Sharks had as much input in the draw as they had in deciding which two teams would join the competition!!!!!!!!!!

@SheldonK (Comment 159) : @pastorshark (Comment 160) : sorry to say but as long as the current management stays in PE I can’t see anything changing!!!!!!!!!!! Maybe time to privatise the teams as they did in Europe!!!!!!!!!

Comment 169, posted at 18.01.16 14:57:27 by JD

@JD (Comment 168) : kahui would be some coup for the sharks!maybe the japanese sr side will sign him?

Comment 170, posted at 18.01.16 15:00:32 by 50shadesofshark

@JD (Comment 169) : Only way to privitise Unions is for the Union presidents to vote for that and well im sure we know how that will go down…

Comment 171, posted at 18.01.16 15:27:20 by SheldonK

@50shadesofshark (Comment 170) : don’t think they did, maybe he’s going to play for a NZ team? Shit just checked Wiki seems his out of contract at the end of the current Japanese season!!!!!!!!!! Please hope they sign him he’s available!!!!!!!!!!

Comment 172, posted at 18.01.16 15:45:24 by JD

@SheldonK (Comment 171) : ja I know it will never happen! Just wish our management could be as professional as they should be and by our management I’m talking about Sharks and SA rugby!!

Comment 173, posted at 18.01.16 15:48:38 by JD

@JD (Comment 172) : pass the info on to the sharks asap!! I’m serious.they asked for fans feedback.that would be a crazy signing to pull-off.perhaps if all of us on sharksworld do that,they might consider it.

Comment 174, posted at 18.01.16 15:49:29 by 50shadesofshark

@JD (Comment 173) : I genuinely think a lot of people would like it to be a lot more professional but the way the structures are set up is like hitting your head against a brick wall. Nobody wants to give up their piece of the pie.

Comment 175, posted at 18.01.16 15:58:29 by SheldonK

@robdylan (Comment 50) : hey Rob does the Sharks know Richard Kahui is out of contract at his Japanese club as soon as the season ends!!!!!!!!!! Just saying!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment 176, posted at 18.01.16 16:04:55 by JD

@SheldonK (Comment 175) : ja I know the feeling so I don’t blame them (to much)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment 177, posted at 18.01.16 16:05:40 by JD

@50shadesofshark (Comment 174) : I just told Rob maybe he knows someone that lives in and works in Durbs!?!?!?!

Comment 178, posted at 18.01.16 16:07:03 by JD

@JD (Comment 177) : It may sound extreme but it appears only way around it is through bribery or guarantees of employment within the bigger franchise in order to change minds

Comment 179, posted at 18.01.16 16:09:34 by SheldonK

@JD (Comment 168) : Get real ”boet ”at R23 to the pound,R16 to the dollar and you think we can sign Kahui,what planet you living on,”Boet”
Shit we don’t have enough money to keep J.P and Steyn with added Bok contracts.
As to your other statement” Sharks had as much input in the draw as they had in deciding which two teams would join the competition!!!!!!!!!!”
What you moaning about then you and Gold,we obviously have absolutely no say in the matter,and we will do as Saru says does.
How many home games did we play last year. answer 8 and 8.
So we have a bigger tournament and yet we have one fewer home game.
It probably means nothing to you ”Boet” because you never attend a home game but to me as a season ticket holder it seriously pisses me off.
Should seriously piss off everyone at the Sharks too thats their life blood.

@the hound: yes the system is flawed.was the same with the super 12 and super 14 re: balance of home and away games.

Comment 182, posted at 18.01.16 16:27:27 by 50shadesofshark

@The hound (Comment 180) : yes,signing kahui might be a bit of a stretch -especially stretching the finances i suppose.but the union asked the fans who would they like to see play for the sharks.it mis a stretch,but it is worth trying imo.

Comment 183, posted at 18.01.16 16:34:28 by 50shadesofshark

@The hound (Comment 180) : it is a different format and although there’s more teams each team will play less games!!! Sharks will only play 15 games as opposed to 16 last year, so this wil result in alternating of 7 home 8 away games and the next year 8 home and 7 away games. During a two year cycle each team will play 15 home and 15 away games!!!
This whole Super 18 is an idiotic idea and I never said anything else about it. However bitching about it will not change anything as this is how it will be.
Only reason I’m not a season ticket holder is because we live 500km away, but trust me I understand the importance of home games for the union and for all the season ticket holders.
As for Kahui I know we have no chance of signing him but we can dream of signing superstars!!!!!

Comment 184, posted at 18.01.16 17:08:14 by JD

@50shadesofshark (Comment 181) : hell no just now they sign him then some people will blame me if ticket and beer prices increase!!!!

@50shadesofshark (Comment 186) : don’t know if they tried but somehow I don’t think they will try.

Comment 187, posted at 18.01.16 17:15:14 by JD

@JD (Comment 184) : quality player out of contract as of the 1st of february in a position the sharks are thin.can we get him involved in a coaching capacity (if he can add value to the coaching team)?how long does he still want to play first-class rugby?

Comment 188, posted at 18.01.16 17:19:10 by 50shadesofshark

@JD (Comment 187) : sign kahui and let the marketing team get more fans to buy season tickets .that is a sign of intent to play attacking rugby.that is a sign of a team wanting to be real title contenders.

Comment 189, posted at 18.01.16 17:23:39 by 50shadesofshark

@50shadesofshark (Comment 188) : think he’s only 30 so can play at least another 3 years or so!!!

Comment 190, posted at 18.01.16 17:27:44 by JD

@JD (Comment 190) : don’t want to lose jordaan or any of the other centres either.one season?2 seasons?would like to have jordaan -and sithole- learn from kahui.

@JD (Comment 165) : It might just be some good PR though, if a sponsor can come in with some money and save the day, no?

Comment 195, posted at 18.01.16 22:08:16 by the ko

@the ko (Comment 195) : yes that’s one way of looking at it but to my knowledge most sponsors want to sponsor a winning team without to many dramas attached but hope they can get a sponsor soon otherwise this whole thing can sink SARU financially.

@50shadesofshark (Comment 192) : how confident are you with those choices that the Sharks are sorted at 12 and 13?

Comment 200, posted at 19.01.16 10:38:38 by benji

@50shadesofshark (Comment 192) : considering Sharks play all NZ franchises this time round?

Comment 201, posted at 19.01.16 10:41:12 by benji

@benji (Comment 201) : there is a lot more options at 12 than at 13-unless sithole and/or jpp will play at 13.

Comment 202, posted at 19.01.16 11:07:32 by 50shadesofshark

@50shadesofshark (Comment 202) : Yes 13 has been a problem position for a long time now,no real proper 13,as for JPP I think the Shaks need him on wing as we play all NZ teams and they opting for big hardcore units

@benji (Comment 200) : @50shadesofshark (Comment 202) : I think the Sharks are ok at 12 but 13 is a bit of a problem. But must say not as a problem as hooker and tight head prop!!

Comment 205, posted at 19.01.16 11:51:49 by JD

@JD (Comment 205) : Chilli will own 2,,he has always been an excellent player just badly managed and misguided,and either Thomas or Connie are going to come through at tight head.
a motivated fit hungry Chilli,with Beast and Coennie/Thomas,excellent front row.

Comment 206, posted at 19.01.16 11:57:36 by The hound

@JD (Comment 206) :
If adriaanse can regain form and stay fit,and coenie stay fit,we should be ok at 3.don’t want thomas to play 3.think he can add much more value at 1.that said,there is quite a few loosehead props at the sharks:beast,chadwick,juan schoeman,thomas.and 2 of the u21s ,potgieter and majola.

@50shadesofshark (Comment 208) : no Beast/thomas/coennie,chilli,thomas/coennie
Show men better in South Africa at least,all very strong ,athletic,agile and hopefully motivated

Comment 209, posted at 19.01.16 12:19:10 by The hound

@The hound (Comment 206) : problem is Chilli is not available going to be available until somewhere near April so until then who is going to step up and perform?!?!?!

Comment 210, posted at 19.01.16 12:23:22 by JD

@50shadesofshark (Comment 207) : ja hope Adriaanse can regain form but Coenie and Thomas did not look really convincing at 3 so don’t think either is the answer to the problem! As for Chadwick I personally think if he does not step up this season it’s time for him to go!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment 211, posted at 19.01.16 12:26:15 by JD

@The hound (Comment 209) : really hope you’re correct and that Coenie and or Thomas can make it at 3!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment 212, posted at 19.01.16 12:27:26 by JD

@The hound (Comment 210) : a fit and in-form adriaanse in the mix at 3,and the frontrow should be solid.

@JD (Comment 206) : can’t see the sharks adding anyone new at tighthead prop ,hooker,but at outside centre there is suddenly an opportunity.don’t know how big,but feel there is.with chili at the sharks,cooper must regain form.sharks were fine when it was bismarck and an in-form cooper as main options at hooker.let’s see how marais goes.tighthead is worrisome.imo it is not about coenie and thomas but adriaanse performing at tighthead prop.

@50shadesofshark (Comment 214) : I would not move Thomas to 3 as he’s a very good loose head and would be second choice to Beast!!! Anyway with Malherbe and Koch I can’t see him being the Bok tight head any time soon.

Comment 220, posted at 19.01.16 14:13:05 by JD

@50shadesofshark (Comment 215) : that makes it 5-6 rounds before he can start practicing with the Sharks, then he must still get use to the players and setup. Really can’t see him starting before end April!

Comment 221, posted at 19.01.16 14:14:53 by JD

@50shadesofshark (Comment 218) : yes must agree if Adriaanse does not step up then maybe it’s time to go!!!!!!!! Sad to say but he has been struggling since joining the Sharks.

Comment 222, posted at 19.01.16 14:17:01 by JD

@JD (Comment 222) : think the rest of the contracted tight five might be frequent visitors at his residence!will be difficult once the season proper starts.but there will always be players from the u21s tight five that can keep him company.

Comment 223, posted at 19.01.16 14:59:52 by 50shadesofshark

@50shadesofshark (Comment 223) : yes if it was for me to decide a couple of these guys will be on very thin ice!!!

So it seems that Lambie has also questioned the new Super Rugby format. #SANZAARmustfall anyone?

Comment 231, posted at 20.01.16 12:20:23 by vanmartin

@vanmartin (Comment 231) : first the coach now the captain!!!!!!!!!! our season is over!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment 232, posted at 20.01.16 13:08:36 by JD

@vanmartin (Comment 231) : Read the article…the published points he makes are all pretty valid. Seems the journalists like asking the Sharks personnel this question…whats wrong with asking the other teams? English no so good?

Comment 233, posted at 20.01.16 13:11:26 by SheldonK

#LambieMustFall!!

Comment 234, posted at 20.01.16 13:12:06 by Southern_Shark

@SheldonK (Comment 233) : The points are very valid but in direct opposition to what SANZAAR wants from the format – more local derbies. I still find it hard to believe that local derbies draw bigger television audiences. The reason I started watching Super Rugby was to see my team face off against non SA sides. Are we in the minority concerning this?

Comment 235, posted at 20.01.16 14:10:10 by vanmartin

@vanmartin (Comment 235) : No im with you on that. I think during a time when the NZ Local comp was fading and Aussie one non existent then perhaps there was more interest in the local derby. Commentators also try to drum up the feisty local derby. But yeh as Lambie said the players want to play all the teams in the comp and if that means playing your local teams too then so be it.

Comment 236, posted at 20.01.16 14:34:28 by SheldonK

@vanmartin (Comment 236) : that is what made me excited about superrugby,beginning with the super 10.was supporting every sa provincial side that played an overseas team.

Comment 237, posted at 20.01.16 14:40:54 by 50shadesofshark

@50shadesofshark (Comment 237) : Id be happy to go back to Super 12. The top 3 sides from SA, NZ and OZ…then 3 invitational sides from the likes of Arg, Japan, Pacific Islanders, Namibia/Zimbabwe etc. So 12 sides. you play 11 games. Team top of the log wins

@pastorshark (Comment 239) : If this is true Jurie deserves a bloody hiding!

Comment 240, posted at 27.01.16 21:26:14 by pastorshark

@pastorshark (Comment 239) : if it’s true then all involved should answer and not just Mr. Roux. Just another question, if the other guy that was also implicated in the matter was fired in 2012 why is Mr. Roux’s part in this only coming to light now 4 years later?

Comment 241, posted at 28.01.16 07:38:24 by JD

@JD (Comment 241) : Yeh seems to be a very interesting story developing. Perhaps this also is a factor why Bok coach not appointed yet. Dont think its too appealing to candidates when the CEO is up on fraud charges

Comment 242, posted at 28.01.16 08:38:18 by SheldonK

@SheldonK (Comment 242) : yes always a reason for thing happening the way they do, it’s just sometimes people don’t know the reason (or don’t want to understand the reason). Interesting times ahead but once again a very big WELL DONE to SARU!!!!!!!!

Comment 243, posted at 28.01.16 08:43:20 by JD

@JD (Comment 243) : Well if this thing blows up i can see a very hastily appointed Bok coach before the first Ireland test