On 5/05/2009 drdeviousii wrote:>On 4/05/2009 orwell wrote:>>A typical Chockstone expert: has an opinion about everything yet knows>>nothing specific about the matter at hand.>>>since you know so much Orwell why don't you enlighten us with the specifics?

Let me think? Should I indulge the Chockstone kangaroo court which has already established the "facts" of the case, tried one of the parties in absentia and condemned them or should I just wait for the real authorities to do their job?

Most posters on this forum have shown themselves to be completely unwilling to take an impartial stance on a serious matter.

I joined Chockstone for the chance to have robust discussions about climbing matters but when it comes to something like this the usual wankers are treating it as if I'd ask some supeficial troll quesion such as "are hexes better than cams" (insert standard knee-jerk "Chocky" shit here).

I'm not interested in being part of a cyber villlage whose population of village idiots outnumbers its opened-minded citizens.