As you look at this exciting 14-minute segment of
Volume II, "Riddles In Stone",
please understand that over one-half of the footage was shot during
Mr. Pinto's November 15-19 trip to Washington, D.C. If you remember
that trip, it was undertaken after a Capitol City security officer
called Cutting Edge in the first of November to offer to get us
into any government building with his Security Clearance. That offer
was a direct answer to prayer, because we had been completely unable
to gain clearance to take our camera into any building, so we were
prepared to create our documentary solely on the outside of buildings,
monuments, and street layouts.

When we photographed the inside of key buildings in
Government Mall, our premise was greatly strenghtened. We praise
God for this answer to prayer!! Our original premise has been monumentally
strenghtened by having this security officer taking us into selected
buildings and showing us things of which he was aware only because
he "walked this beat" daily; most importantly, he showed
us the monumnent of the god Baal "resurrecting" out of
his grave, a site unknown to most people because it is truly "off
the beaten path" in Government Center. Yet, the concept of
Baal being resurrected completes the proof we needed that all of
Government Center has been created to tell ONE
monumentally important story!

When Mr. Pinto arrived back at his studio in Los Angeles,
he faced a daunting task. The script had been completed before we
received this phone call, and much the footage set in place, as
he had been pressing for a late November completion. With this new
material, the script had to be rewritten. Therefore, we are now
pressing toward a very late December finish, with shipping to begin
mid-January.

We apologize for this new delay, but please stick
with us, for we believe God is directing us to produce the "story
of the ages", as we reveal the true occult plan for Washington,
D.C., and the nation of America. Once you understand what we are
going to teach you in this video, you will never look at current
news the same way again!

NOTE: This trailer is darker and far less distinct
than it will be on the actual video - DVD/VHS. We apologize, but
rest assurred, the quality of the video will be as superior as it
was in Volume I, "The New Atlantis".

---------
Inspiration For the Week-------"Call
thy labourers, and give them their hire." Matthew
20:8

God is a good paymaster; He pays His servants while
at work as well as when they have done it; and one of His payments
is this: an easy conscience. If you have spoken faithfully of Jesus
to one person, when you go to bed at night you feel happy in thinking,
"I have this day discharged my conscience of that man's blood."

There is a great comfort in doing something for Jesus.
Oh, what a happiness to place jewels in His crown, and give Him
to see of the travail of His soul! There is also very great reward
in watching the first buddings of conviction in a soul! To say of
that girl in the class, "She is tender of heart, I do hope
that there is the Lord's work within." To go home and pray
over that boy, who said something in the afternoon which made you
think he must know more of divine truth than you had feared! Oh,
the joy of hope! But as for the joy of success! it is unspeakable.
This joy, overwhelming as it is, is a hungry thing--you pine for
more of it. To be a soul-winner is the happiest thing in the world.
With every soul you bring to Christ, you get a new heaven upon earth.

But who can conceive the bliss which awaits us above!
Oh, how sweet is that sentence, "Enter thou into the joy of
thy Lord!" Do you know what the joy of Christ is over a saved
sinner? This is the very joy which we are to possess in heaven.
Yes, when He mounts the throne, you shall mount with Him. When the
heavens ring with "Well done, well done," you shall partake
in the reward; you have toiled with Him, you have suffered with
Him, you shall now reign with Him; you have sown with Him, you shall
reap with Him; your face was covered with sweat like His, and your
soul was grieved for the sins of men as His soul was, now shall
your face be bright with heaven's splendour as is His countenance,
and now shall your soul be filled with beatific joys even as His
soul is. (C.H. Spurgeon, "Morning
and Evening Devotions"

---------- This Weeks
Hot News ----------

I.
The truth about the 9/11 attacks may be closer to coming to the
forefront now that a Boston Traffic Controller has gone public,
telling the world that the attacks were an "inside job".

NEWS BRIEF: "A former Boston Center air traffic
controller has gone public on his assertion that 9/11 was an inside
job and that Donald Rumsfeld and the Pentagon tracked three of the
four flights from the point of their hijacking to hitting their
targets. In an astounding telephone interview, Robin Hordon claims
air traffic controllers have been ignored or silenced to protect
the true perpetrators of 9/11."

I had always wondered why air traffic controllers
had not come forward to report the strange situaiton they had to
have witnessed during the long moments the airliners were tracked
into their targets in New York City and Washington, D.C. I figured
they were either part of the plan, or had been coerced into silence.
After reading this testimony from a former Boston air traffic controller,
I believe the latter reason is the truth: they were frightened into
silence.

Now, let us return to his terrific story.

"After having acquired a background in aviation,
Hordon underwent rigorous FAA training to become an air traffic
controller and was posted to Boston Center where he worked for eleven
years. He did not work at Boston Center when 9/11 occurred but still
knows people that did who concur with his conclusions. In comparing
the stand down of air defense on 9/11 and what should have occurred
according to standard operating procedure, he quickly concluded
on the very afternoon of the attacks that they could represent nothing
other than an inside job."

"... 'I knew that it was an inside job I think
within about four or five o'clock that afternoon and the reason
that I knew is because when those aircraft did collide and then
we got the news and information on where the aircraft were and where
they went....if they knew where the aircraft were and were talking
to them at a certain time then normal protocol is to get fighter
jet aircraft up to assist', said Hordon."

"Hordon said that from personal experience he
knew the system was always ready to immediately scramble intercepting
fighters and that any reversal of that procedure would have been
unprecedented and abnormal ... the debate has deliberately been
channeled by NORAD and the government to focus on reactions to hijackings,
when the real issue is the emergency condition of the aircraft well
before a hijacking is even confirmed."

"...as soon as the hijacking of Flight 11 was
confirmed at around 8:24am, the entire system, from every FAA center
coast to coast, to the Pentagon, to the President were informed
and knew of the hijacking. 'The system now had to make some phone
calls and call up Rummy's Pentagon and Rummy's Pentagon is the one
that would then make the decision' ... Rummy's Pentagon on American
11 didn't answer the phone ... the real focus is what the air traffic
controller did immediately upon seeing that American 11 was in trouble
and what we do as air traffic controllers is we get eyes and ears
on this flight."

"Hordon underscored the fact that after the confirmed
hijacking of Flight 11, the entire FAA system would have been on
full alert and obsessively watching the skies for any unusual activity,
and that such activity as the hijacking of Flight 77 would have
been immediately reported to supervisors instantaneously, as well
as being continually tracked .. It's very clear now through testimony
and documents given to us by the federal government that indeed....the
Boston Center actually tracked American 11 as a primary target after
it lost its radar, after it lost its transponder, all the way to
World Trade Center."

"Further information indicates later the NORAD
radars had it tracked....the bottom line of the story is that all
of those aircraft were always tracked all the time by the FAA air
traffic control centers," said Hordon, pointing out that information
showing air traffic controllers tried insistently to alert military
command structures is being locked down because it points to finger
of responsibility to Donald Rumsfeld and the Pentagon, who were
also tracking all the aircraft from the point of hijacking to the
impact on their targets."

This personal report shows that air traffic controllers
routinely reacted "according to protocol", i.e., as they
had been trained to react, once they realized American Flight 11
was in trouble. The Pentagon was called, but incredibly, refused
to pick up the phone. Protocol demands that the entire "chain
of command" be informed by the FAA, right up to the President
of the United States.

The more sensitive proof of a deliberate lack of response
from the military had to be confiscated and destroyed.

"... a conversation
between six New York Air Route Traffic Control Center controllers
was ordered to be shredded, because if studies of that
evidence were undertaken it would become very clear as to who was
really behind the attack. 'What they did is they cherry picked transmissions,
communications and statements made all on these four flights that
were able to paint and write a story that the public would look
at and so ooh wow, this really happened - but it wasn't factual,
it was a story and it tell not tell anything other than what the
high perps wanted the public to hear - they cherry picked this information',
said Hordon."

Clearly, the entire group of FAA and NORAD personnel
should have been dismissed as incompetent and tried for treason,
as those planes were tracked, but yet no fighter planes were ever
scrambled to intercept. For the attacks to have occurred as the
1995 Illuminati
Card Gameclearly predicted, the military lines of
protection in place around American cities had to be rendered impotent
as the planes were roaring in upon New York City and The Pentagon.
The protection system was well thought out and the planes in position;
yet, they never were scrambled.

Study the two most revealing cards from the Illuminati
Card Game, pictured below. Remember, the date on which this role-playing
card game was introduced to the gaming public -- early 1995! Since
the Steve Jackson Game Company began planning this card game in
1990, that means that members of the occult community knew of this
Illuminati Plan to attack the World Trade Centers with a "Terrorist
Nuke" and to attack The Pentagon 11 full years before the attacks
occurred.

Then, remember that the purpose of each card in the
original 1995 deck was to show an action the ILLUMINATI intended
to take in order to overthrow the Old Order so the New World Order
could come into reality.

These two facts mean that agents of the Illuminati
carried out the attacks on 9/11! That is the reason no one in The
Pentagon even answered the phone when the FAA tried to call! Of
course, Donald Rumsfeld was complicit, and so was Skull & Bones
President Bush. Any inquiry into the attacks of 9/11 which does
not start with the understanding that the global Illuminati was
behind the attacks is flawed to the core -- and should be ignored.

No official within the Bush Administration was incompetent
that day; most Americans are confused because they just do not understand
what agenda our military and civilian leadership was following.
Rather than protecting American cities and American lives, their
job that day was to allow the attackers to be carried out as the
Illuminati had planned!

Carefully consider the impact of these two "Illuminati
Card Games", pictured below. Remember, they were out on the
marketplace in Spring, 1995.

DVD - Record of Government-Created
Terrorism In Order To Further The Illuminati Agenda

II.
Illinois Senator Obama -- coming out of nowhere to contend for the
Presidency

I learned a valuable lesson from Jimmy Carter. Just
about one year before he won the Presidential nomination from the
Democrat Party, Carter was virtually unknown to the America public
at large. Yet, he had Illuminati muscle and money behind him, plus
professional media savvy, and he received all the news play he needed
-- on TV, newspapers, magazines, and interviews -- in order to jump
to the head of the pack.

The lesson I learned from Jimmy Carter is simple:
whenever you see an unknown person coming out of nowhere to receive
huge press, and start winning elections, you may know for certain
he or she is backed amply by the Illuminati. Additonally, you may
know that this person has a most important role to play in the future
plan.

Barack Obama is just that kind of "coming out
of nowhere" type of person! Elected as Senator from the state
of Illinois in November, 2004, Obama is now the fifth African American
Senator in U.S. history and the only African American presently
serving in the U.S. Senate.[Wikipedia Encyclopedia]

During the 2004 campaign, Obama delivered the keynote
speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention (Ibid.)

Now, immediately after the 2006 elections had passed,
Barack Obama is now being touted as a serious candidate for President!

"In the wake of Barack Obama's high-energy and
much-publicized debut in the Granite State, the first "Barack
Obama for President" ad will begin airing early next week air
on WMUR and some cable news outlets. The ad was first made public
on UnionLeader.com yesterday afternoon. To view the ad, click
here ... The ad begins with the written words, "We can
replace fear," superimposed over a photo of President George
W. Bush, 'with hope'. It ends with the written words, 'Believe again'."

"RUSH: Here we go with Barack Obama. As you know,
he was up in New Hampshire -- do you know, by the way, TV ads for
Barack Obama are going to start airing this weekend ... Hillary,
I think, is starting to get panicked ... Anyway, Obama up in New
Hampshire being treated like a god making a speech."

That just about says it all about the way in which
Barack Obama is bring treated right now by the Mass Media -- like
a god.

However, Fundamental Christians have reason to be
concerned, for Obama is simply Bill Clinton in disguise.

"A pro-family leader says one of his U.S. senators
-- Illinois Democrat Barack Obama -- is becoming 'the poster boy
for the liberal redefinition of Christianity' ... Senator Obama
is in the midst of a nationwide tour to generate support for a possible
2008 presidential run and to promote his book, The Audacity of Hope.
In his memoir, Obama writes: "I was reminded that it is my
obligation not only as an elected official in a pluralistic society,
but also as a Christian, to remain open to the possibility that
my unwillingness to support gay marriage is misguided."

Now you know that Obama claims to be a Christian --
but who hasn't made that claim? President Bill Clinton carried a
huge old Bible with him when he went to church, holding up over
his head as he walked out of the sanctuary. President Bush has made
a firm claim to be a Bible-believing Christian, as did his dad,
as did Ronald Reagan.

What is new about Obama's claim is this strange statement
that he is willing to consider that he should not be opposed to
gay marriage!

Returning back to our featured article, we read:

"Peter LaBarbera is president of Americans for
Truth and the former head of the Illinois Family Institute. The
first-term senator can say he is talking religious values to the
public and continue portraying himself as a traditional-values Christian,
says LaBarbera, but Obama is actually advancing policies that attack
those values."

Can you imagine that? Obama is actually "advancing
policies that attack" Fundamental Christianity? It looks like
the old Army Intelligence adage that the truth is often discovered
in exactly the opposite direction of the public rhetoric (NEWS1558,
"BREAKING OUT OF THE MENTAL BOX -- LEARNING TO
THINK IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF PROPAGANDA TO FIND THE TRUTH")
is true in this case, as well.

Prepare yourself, for the shock of the truth behind
Obama is about to get worse.

"...for Obama to say that, in order to be a good
Christian, he has to consider 'something that's anti-Christian is
just wrong', says the Christian activist. He describes Obama as
'as pro-abortion as they come, and very pro-homosexual'."

This last segment tells us from whence Obama got his
very Liberal christian views:

"Obama is a member of the United Church of Christ
(UCC) denomination and attends Trinity United Church of Christ in
Chicago ... "The United Church of Christ has now merged with
the largest gay church in the world, called the Cathedral of Hope,
in Texas," LaBarbera notes. "And so they're welcoming
in churches that are embracing homosexuality, so they've become
one of the most liberal denominations in the country."

"At its General Synod last year, the UCC adopted
a resolution calling for "equal marriage rights for all"
-- regardless of gender. Obama has been quoted as saying that the
denomination's "spirit of inclusiveness" has served as
a model for him during his time in the Senate."

The word, "inclusiveness" is on the lips
of gay activists more than any other word these days. The matter
is clear: Barack Obama is just as Liberal as either Bill or Hillary
Clinton. And, he may just be planned as a Vice-Presidential candidate
running with Hillary. Remember this: even though the "race"
is going to be interesting, the plan is already fixed - "the
fix is in", and Obama has a role to play.

III. The deliberate disaster
called Iraq took a bizarre turn this week.

Would you have ever believed that a top general who
is serving at the "pleasure of the President" would actually
say that this Iraq War could "break the Army"? I thought
President Bush has been telling us all along that everything is
just fine, as long as we "stayed the course"!

"WASHINGTON — The Army's top general said
Thursday that the mission in Iraq 'will break' the Army without
an expansion of the size of the active-duty force or the remobilization
of the National Guard and reserves. Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, the
Army chief of staff, said the all-volunteer Army was being tested
by a schedule that allowed less than a year at home for active-duty
units between deployments to Iraq."

I guess no one told the general that Uncle Sam is
kind of broke right now, and might not be able to afford such an
increase in new manpower.

"... the high operational demand placed on the
Army is unlikely to end soon, Schoomaker said. And without sending
reservists to Iraq for additional tours or expanding the size of
the active-duty Army, it would be difficult ... Schoomaker did not
say precisely how much he wanted the Army to grow. But he said 'current
demand' made an increase 'wise and prudent'. His remarks left open
the possibility that the Army would seek an increase beyond its
current limit of 512,000 ... "

As it turns out, General Schoomaker is not the only
top general talking about an increase in the number of forces.

"Last month, Marine Gen. James T. Conway said
that an increase in his force was under consideration and that funding
for a temporary boost in the size of the Corps could be included
in next year's supplemental budget request."

As usual, the National Guard and Reservist units are
taking the brunt of the load. Remember this truth the next time
you see a "Weekend Warrior" advertisement.

"Army officials have been talking privately for
months about the need to send guard and reserve units for second
tours. But Schoomaker's remarks were the most forceful public presentation
yet about the need to tap the reserves further ... Under current
practice, the National Guard and reserves can be mobilized for only
a single tour in Iraq ... Army officials believe under the law they
are allowed to remobilize reservists for a second tour.Top Pentagon
officials have not yet allowed such involuntary remobilizations,
but the policy is being examined by the Commission on the National
Guard and Reserves."

Imagine that! President Bush's Iraq war is stretching
the Army so thin that top generals are now talking openly about
"breaking the Army"! Does anyone really believe the tale
that we can take on Iran for any reason whatsoever?

Remember in the last newsletter, we said that the
reason President Bush is suddenly talking about 20,000 or so additional
troops was that the military needed additional troops to cover a
retreat into the cities, especially Baghdad? This week saw three
important Senators speak to this subject again.

"BAGHDAD, Iraq -- The issue of U.S. troop levels
echoed from Baghdad to Washington on Thursday, with Sen. John McCain
calling for the deployment of 15,000 to 30,000 more troops to Iraq,
and the Army's top general warning that his force "will break"
without thousands more active-duty soldiers and greater use of the
reserves. McCain, who was visiting Baghdad with five other senators,
said he realizes that few Americans favor deploying more U.S. troops
to Iraq ... But he said if U.S. troops leave Iraq in chaos, groups
such as al-Qaida 'will follow us home and that we will have a large
conflict and greater challenges than those that we now face here
in Iraq'."

You can always spot an Establishment politician these
days, for they raise the specter of "Al-Qaeda" -- that
terror group the CIA created out of thin air during the Russian
invasion of Afghanistan. Al-Qaeda is the "bogeyman" which
the Bush Administration needs to invoke in order to justify continued
war in Iraq. When people believe that our rapid withdrawal from
Iraq might result in more World Trade Center type buildings getting
blown down by "Al Qaeda", they can more easily support
the President's position.

It seems as though the die is set: more troops are
needed in order to carry out the re-direction of priorities called
for in the Baker Iraq Study Group Report, i.e., shifting American
forces from active combat roles throughout Iraq to a more training
role within the city environs. This theme is going to be repeated
again and again over the coming months.

Already, I am seeing stories that American forces
are transferring combat responsibility to the Iraqis.

"PHILADELPHIA - Several weeks ago, I wrote about
an Iraqi Christian friend who fled his home for neighboring Jordan.
He and his family feared for their lives in a civil war atmosphere
in which civilians were being pulled out of cars and shot on neighborhood
streets. My friend George is part of an Iraqi refugee crisis that
has attracted little attention as Americans debate whether to draw
down U.S. troops. The U.N. high commissioner for refugees said in
November that up to 2,000 Iraqis a day were leaving Iraq for nearby
Syria, and an additional 1,000 a day for Jordan. U.N. agencies and
nongovernmental organizations estimate that more than 1 million
Iraqis have fled the country since 2003."

"The pace has accelerated as Iraq has sunk into
a vicious cycle of sectarian killing ... In neighborhoods throughout
Baghdad, and in mixed cities around Iraq, sectarian militias are
driving out members of minorities in their area. Sunnis or Shiites
are given a few hours' notice to leave on pain of death, or are
simply murdered. Families that lived next to each other for decades
are forced out. Almost everyone I know in Iraq has relatives who
have fled."

What parts of the Iraqi national infrastructure not
destroyed outright is being destroyed in other ways, like forcing
Iraqis to flee the country. Truly, the situation seems completely
broken, with no end in sight, and no pleasing goal in sight.

IV.
Just as the "fix was in" for America to invade Iraq, so
the "fix is in" regarding the tactics the Americans would
use in this useless war. Even the much-hyped Baker Iraq Study Group
Report was "fixed ahead of time".

None of this information is a surprise to those discerning
people who understand how events occur in this time period immediately
preceding the New World Order. For the rest, however, this news
must be shattering.

The first two-thirds of this article tells about the
war games which the United States military conducted in Summer 2002,
in which the decidedly inferior "Red Team" representing
the insurgent enemy defeated the official "Blue Team"
representing United States forces. In fact, "defeated"
is not the right term, for it is far too mild. What was the wording
used by one journalist to describe the Blue Team loss in this war
games?

"The Worst US Naval Disaster Since Pearl Harbor".

Cutting Edge posted an indepth report on this horrific
war games in NEWS2026,
entitled, "16 U.S. NAVAL SHIPS AT THE BOTTOM OF
THE PERSIAN GULF! INCLUDES ONE AIRCRAFT CARRIER DESTROYED --
Recent War Games Disaster"

This article shows colored maps to illustrate our
point, so we encourage you to read about this most important --
and most ignored -- war games conducted almost one year prior to
America's invasion.

Now, let us return to the L.A. Times article to see
the author's conclusions about this war games. After discussing
how embarrassing the results were to the official Pentagon image,
Tom Engelhardt noted how the Pentagon "fixed" the problem.
Did they change the tactics they planned to use in the Iraq War?
You have got to be kidding. Instead of that, the Pentagon acted
in its normal government fashion:

"So they 'fixed' the intelligence and, Van Riper's
experience shows, they also 'fixed' the plans for the war itself.
And in the months and years since then, there isn't much that hasn't
been fixed in a similar manner. Only recently, James A. Baker III's
Iraq Study Group report described gross underreporting of violence
in Iraq by U.S. intelligence officials .... And even the Iraq Study
Group was fixed. Before they began, Baker and his cohorts ensured
that while the group would be filled with notable movers and shakers
from numerous previous administrations, there would be no outspoken
representatives of the point of view that a majority of Americans
have by now come to believe — that there should be an actual
withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Iraq on a set timeline."

"When you control both sides of a war game or
the range of opinion on a panel, you can generally rest assured
of the results you're going to get. Unfortunately, you can't always
fix reality itself, which has a tendency to remain obdurately, passionately,
irascibly unconquerable."

We have been saying for a very long time now that
the Iraq War was like Vietnam in that it was a war planned to not
win. Truly, the "fix has been in" from the very beginning.

V. A new Secretary General
of the United Nations is now in place -- South Korean Ban Ki-Moon.

The really big news is that, at this most important
time in world history, Ban Ki-Moon might be a follower of the Rev.
Sun Myung Moon, the founder of the Unification Church - the man
who claims to be Messiah.

"UNITED NATIONS – South Korea's Ban Ki-moon
took the oath of office as the next secretary-general of the United
Nations on Thursday, promising to restore the organization's tarnished
reputation and push for peace in the Middle East and Darfur. In
his sharpest comments, he said Iran's call for Israel's destruction
and its dismissal of the Nazi Holocaust were “unacceptable,”
and he expressed concern about the regional and global implications
of Tehran's nuclear program."

"Calling himself 'a harmonizer and bridge-builder',
Ban said his first priority when he takes the reins of the U.N.
on Jan. 1 will be 'to restore trust', in the organization. The United
Nations has been criticized for corruption and mismanagement. He
also pledged to try to rebuild trust among member states who have
been deeply divided over U.N. reforms."

Ban Ki-Moon certainly is speaking all the right words
in his introductory remarks. Whether he can actually deliver on
these wonderful words remains to be seen. The time is certainly
coming when the United Nations needs to be well enough thought of
so that, when Antichrist actually does arrive on the world scene,
the United Nations will be seen as credible enough for him to be
able to lead it.

Most people agreed that Kofi Annan was too "light-weight"
to lead the UN to the new heights it clearly must go -- especially
with the Masonic Christ coming to the world scene. The question
of the hour is: Will Ban Ki-moon be that right man? If the stories
are true that he is a "Moonie", his religion might be
one of the very large reasons he was selected to this post at this
critical moment in world history.

"WMR was the first to report on UN Secretary
General-designate Ban Ki-moon's possible connections to the Unification
Church of Sun Myung Moon, an enigmatic South Korean power broker
and billionaire whose funding originally came from the Korean Central
Intelligence Agency (KCIA)."

Cutting Edge posted an article some years ago, reporting
the almost unbelievable story that many top-line American religious
leaders have been caught taking money from the Rev. Sun Myung Moon
(NEWS1818).
If you have not yet heard that the Rev. Moon has helped bankroll
some of America's biggest names in Protestant circles, please take
the time to read this information now.

Returning to this Wayne Madsen report:

"Based on Ban's Friday press conference, his
answers about his views of religion appear quite 'Moonie-like' ...
Ban would not even answer a pointed question from the Financial
Times whether or not he believed in God. Ban, who states in his
biography that he is a member of a 'non-denominational Korean Christian'
sect, had an answer one might expect from a Moonie."

As we learn more about Ban Ki-Moon, we can see why
he might be just the man the United Nations needs in this position
at this time.

"The fact that the UN Secretary General feels
it is the place of the UN to hold conferences of interfaith dialogue
at the same time he refuses to say whether he believes in God is
a worrisome sign. Interfaith dialogue has usually been the purview
of the Organization of Islamic Conference, the Holy See, the World
Council of Churches, and other international religious organizations.
Unification Church adherents believe Sun Myung Moon is their 'god',
and Sun Myung Moon has been working over the years to infiltrate
the UN .... he has already been successful in receiving UN non-governmental
organization (NGO) recognition and consultative status for his front
organizations: the Women's Federation for World Peace (Economic
and Social Council - ECOSOC - recognition), the Family Federation
for World Peace, and World Association of Non-Governmental Organizations
(WANGO). In 2001, Moon held a mass wedding in a UN conference room
and he is on record as stating that 'our movement and the UN are
completely connected'." (Wayne Madsen, Online Journal, October
17, 2006)

Finally, the Rev. Sun Myung Moon has tight connections
with the American political and religious hierarchy.

"Sun Myung Moon has close connections to the
right wing of the Republican Party, Jerry Falwell, and the Bush
family. He has also infiltrated a number of UN missions, including
those of Indonesia, Gambia, Bangladesh, Mongolia, Uzbekistan, Comoros,
Iran, Mozambique, Tajikistan, the Arab League, and the Organization
of Islamic Conference. Although Sun Myung Moon has established many
footholds inside the UN, the election of Ban Ki-moon as Secretary
General may be his greatest prize." (Ibid.)

If the Rev. Sun Myung Moon has his man leading the
United Nations at this moment in world history, the appearance of
the Messiah might be very close! After all, it was not too long
ago when Rev. Moon was declared "Messiah" in a ceremony
at the United States Capitol! We covered this story in our article,
below.

"TRENTON, New Jersey (Reuters) - New Jersey lawmakers
approved same-sex civil unions on Thursday, giving gay and lesbian
couples the same rights as married partners without allowing such
relationships to be called 'marriage'. With the expected signature
of Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine in coming days, New Jersey will become
the third U.S. state after Vermont and Connecticut to legalize civil
unions. The New Jersey measure follows an October 25 state Supreme
Court ruling that affirmed equal rights for same-sex couples but
left it to lawmakers to decide whether to use the term "marriage."

"Stephen Goldstein, chairman of gay rights group
Garden State Equality, said civil unions represent 'tremendous progress'.
But he said he was disappointed legislators did not legalize gay
marriage ... poll by the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute
in Hamden, Connecticut, showed last week that 60 percent of New
Jersey voters supported a law allowing civil unions ... The measure
passed the state Senate with a vote of 23-12 after the Assembly
approved the measure 56-19 with five abstentions. Both houses are
controlled by Democrats."

We are sure that Liberal Democrats and gay advocates
are greatly pleased by this ruling, but how about President Bush?
Surely, he is opposed vehemently to "Civil Unions", right?
Wrong!

In mid-2005, Cutting Edge boldly reported that President
Bush was trying to play both sides of this issue, by assuring his
Conservatve and/or Christian base that he was opposed to "gay
marriage" and that he wanted marriage defined as between "one
man, one woman"; however, on the other hand, Bush was on public
record as approving of "civil union", a gay marriage by
just another name.

Take a few moments to read our article: "President
Bush Undertaking A Major Deception Campaign To Win Back Conservative
Voters -- Especially Christians", NEWS2136)

America is heading straight into the eternal ditch
called "The Abyss", and both Republican and Democrat leaders
are "cheerleading" this nation straight into that mighty
pit of judgment. Skull & Bones Bush has done his nefarious part.

VII. A new book just now
coming out tells us what many of us already knew: President Bush
is just using Christians for political gain!

NEWS BRIEF: "Book
says Bush just using Christians: ‘Tempting Faith’
author David Kuo worked for Bush from 2001 to 2003", By
Jonathan Larsen, "Countdown" producer, MSNBC, December
13, 2006

"More than five years after President Bush created
the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives, the former second-in-command
of that office is going public with an insider’s tell-all
account that portrays an office used almost exclusively to win political
points with both evangelical Christians and traditionally Democratic
minorities."

"The office’s primary mission, providing
financial support to charities that serve the poor, never got the
presidential support it needed to succeed, according to the book
... He says some of the nation’s most prominent evangelical
leaders were known in the office of presidential political strategist
Karl Rove as “the nuts.”

“ 'National Christian leaders received hugs
and smiles in person and then were dismissed behind their backs
and described as ‘ridiculous,’ ‘out of control,’
and just plain ‘goofy,’” Kuo writes."

Then, David Kuo showed how the "sons of this
world are wiser than the children of light".

"More seriously, Kuo alleges that then-White
House political affairs director Ken Mehlman knowingly participated
in a scheme to use the office, and taxpayer funds, to mount ostensibly
“nonpartisan” events that were, in reality, designed
with the intent of mobilizing religious voters in 20 targeted races.
Nineteen out of the 20 targeted races were won by Republicans, Kuo
reports. The outreach was so extensive and so powerful in motivating
not just conservative evangelicals, but also traditionally Democratic
minorities, that Kuo attributes Bush’s 2004 Ohio victory “at
least partially … to the conferences we had launched two years
before.”

President Bush's much-publicized program was a serious
bust as a means by which to help Christian ministries, but was a
wonderful political machine, as the next figures show.

"In fact, when Bush asks Kuo how much money was
being spent on 'compassion' social programs, Kuo claims he discovered
the amount was $20 million a year less than during the Clinton Administration.
The money that was appropriated and disbursed, however, often served
a political agenda, Kuo claims, with organizations friendly to the
administration often winning grants."

Cutting Edge posted an article in early 2001, shortly
after President Bush announced his "Faith-Based Initiative".
That article is NEWS1465,
"PRESIDENT BUSH'S PLAN TO DOLE OUT FEDERAL MONEY
TO FAITH-BASED MINISTRIES IS A TROJAN HORSE THREAT TO WEAKEN AND
DESTROY TRUE CHURCHES!"

Please take the time to read this 2001 article, for
our warnings were right on the money.

"After US secretary of defense, it was Prime
Minister Ehud Olmert 's turn to break Israel's nuclear ambiguousness.
In an interview with German TV station N24, Sat1, broadcast Monday
ahead of his first visit to Germany as prime minister, Olmert said
that 'Israel is a democracy and does not threaten anyone. The only
thing we have tried to do is to live without terror, but we have
never threatened anyone with annihilation. Iran explicitly, openly
and publicly threatens to wipe Israel off the map'."

So far, so good, for Prime Minister Olmert. But, then
the Prime Minister uttered a sentence which blew the lid off Israel's
deliberate policy of official ambiguity about whether Israel really
possesses nuclear weapons. All Israel's leaders since the 1960's
have refused to publicly, officially, admit that Israel possessed
nuclear weapons, holding to the policy of "refusing to confirm
or deny".

This segment of this news story reports the truth
about Israel's official position as to whether or not she possessed
nuclear weapons. Israel is widely believed to possess several hundred
nuclear warheads, but it has consistently stuck to a policy of ambiguity,
insisting it will not be the "first to introduce nuclear weapons
into the Middle East."

Listen to Olmert's next words.

"Can you see that is the same level when you
are aspiring to have a nuclear weapon as America, France, Israel
and Russia?" he asked."

Listen to the condensed version: "Can you see
that is the same level when you are aspiring to have a nuclear weapon
as ... Israel"?

"Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's visit to Berlin
Tuesday - at least in the eyes of the Israeli press - was overshadowed
by one sentence he said in a German television interview on Monday
regarding Israel's alleged nuclear capabilities ... Whether this
sentence amounted to Israel's formal acknowledgement that it has
joined the elite club of nations with nuclear arms is open to debate.
But one thing is certain: for the second time in a month, Olmert
and his advisers were forced to scramble and explain that he was
not understood correctly..."

"But still, the tempest Olmert's comments caused
in Israel - a tempest not echoed in the German or international
media - seemed due less to the content of what he said, and more
that he actually said anything at all. Coupled with his comments
about the (captured) soldiers, Olmert's remarks about the nukes
didn't reveal as much about Israel's nuclear potential as they uncovered
a subliminal fear among certain segments of the public that if this
was the type of remark Olmert let slip today, then what might tomorrow
bring?"

Since Israel's debacle during the 33-day Lebanon War,
Olmert's popularity has sunk quickly, probably never to recover.
This latest gaffe is stimulating the debate as to whether Olmert
has what it takes to be Prime Minister of a modern, major country.
But, more importantly, the most important concern is that Israel
is a country so small that its existence can be ended by just one
major mistake.

Many Jews are wondering if Olmert is too dangerous
to Israel's existence to continue in office.

"Foreign Ministry spokesman
Mohammad-Ali Hosseini said here Tuesday that the confession of the
Zionist regime's prime minister that Israel has nuclear military
potential shows real threat to the Middle East security and stability
... such a confession reveals the vicious goals and plots of the
Zionist regime to materialized the strategy of terror and continued
occupation of the regional territories'."

"... he stated that the
official admission of the Zionist regime's prime minister is a clear
sign of the extraordinary conditions stemming from military and
security threat against regional Islamic countries. 'Therefore,
quick and efficient decisions need to be taken by the United Nations
Security Council (UNSC), the Organization of Islamic Conference
(OIC) and other regional bodies to confront such evident threats',
he added."

IX. Israel is continuing
to construct the Security Barrier which will separate the populations
but now, construction will not be completed until the end of 2008
-- two full years from now.

"Construction of the West Bank security barrier
will be completed by the end of 2008, a senior defense official
involved in the project told The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday. The
Defense Ministry has completed 402 kilometers of the barrier, and
106 kilometers are currently under construction ... another 240
kilometers is currently tied up in court by some 40 petitions and
also by the Justice Ministry, which is currently examining every
stretch of the barrier which is before the court. The final route
of the barrier has been approved by the cabinet, including two finger-shaped
enclaves surrounding the settlements of Ariel and Karnei Shomron.
Among the most complicated sections are the ones slated to surround
the Gush Etzion settlement bloc and Ma'ale Adumim..."

"... 115 petitions against the route of the barrier
or related issues have been submitted to the High Court of Justice.
The court has finished dealing with 69 of them, including 41 that
ended with rulings and 28 that ended in compromise arrangements
between the sides. The court still has to deal with 46 petitions
.."

In October, 2000, Cutting Edge posted
a most controversial article in which we postulated
that Israel had originally designed the Oslo Peace Accords to serve
simply as a means by which to encourage the Palestinians to live
in their own state, congregating in one geographical location.

Then, after the Palestinians had gathered into one
area, the Israelis could annihilate them man, woman, and child,
in fulfillment of Obadiah 15-18.

However, getting the Palestinians to congregate in
one spot is only one part of the equation; the other part is that
even this corrupt Israeli leadership would not want to slaughter
300,000 of its own citizens who are living in close proximity to
the Palestinians.

What is the answer? To separate the Jewish population
from the Palestinian. We felt, in October 2000, that the only two
ways to carry out such a separation of populations would be:

1) A physical barrier;

2) Physically remove Jewish settlers from The Gaza
Strip and the West Bank.

Once these two steps had been taken, Israel could
move to fulfill the fiery prophecy in Obadiah 15-18.

Please take a few moments to read our articles: NEWS2095
is the key article, as it references all previous articles.

A key prophecy is being gradually fulfilled in your
midst. Have you noticed?

X. Palestinian
Civil War may be at hand.

NEWS BRIEF: "Palestinian
forces deploy across Gaza: After The three children
of a senior intelligence chief were yesterday shot dead by unidentified
gunmen as they arrived at school", ABC News Online, December
13, 2006

"Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has ordered
security forces to deploy across Gaza after three young sons of
one of his Fatah faction loyalists were murdered. The three children
of a senior intelligence chief were yesterday shot dead by unidentified
gunmen as they arrived at school . The deaths have shocked Palestinians
and stoked fears of further internal strife. Political tension has
been rising over the failure of the ruling Hamas movement and Fatah
to form a unity government. That has soared after yesterday's killings."

"Unidentified gunmen have shot dead a judge from
the governing Palestinian movement Hamas near his courthouse in
Gaza, increasing fears of civil war. Hamas officials said Bassam
al-Fara, 28, was a judge in a civil court but also a member of the
faction's armed wing. Mr Fara was on his way to work in the southern
Gaza town of Khan Younis when he was shot by four gunmen, the officials
said. Tensions and violence have spiralled in Gaza and the occupied
West Bank between Hamas and the rival Fatah faction of President
Mahmoud Abbas after attempts to form a national unity government
failed."

But, then, Fatah attempted to really raise the level
of the probably civil war by attempting to assassinate a top-level
Hamas official.

"RAFAH, Gaza Strip -- Hamas gunmen seized control
of the Gaza Strip's border crossing with Egypt on Thursday in a
ferocious gunbattle with Fatah-allied border guards after Israel
blocked the Hamas prime minister from crossing with tens of millions
of dollars in aid. Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh was eventually
allowed to cross without the estimated $35 million cash but on the
Gaza side of the border, his convoy came under intense fire from
Fatah gunmen and one of his bodyguards was killed. Hamas said the
gunmen had been aiming to kill the prime minister. More than two
dozen people were wounded in the fighting, deepening factional violence
that has pushed the rivals closer to civil war

"Rising tensions in the Palestinian Authority:
At least 10 Palestinians were wounded in confrontations between
gunmen loyal to Hamas and Fatah, one of the men was reportedly in
critical condition. Witnesses told Ynet that some of the wounded
are bystanders and protestors who were beaten by Palestinian security
forces seeking to clear the streets, primarily from the center of
town which was declared a closed military zone. Witnesses added
that PA security forces have begun covering their faces with masks
as they try to overpower protestors and gunmen from both factions,
mostly against Hamas. The atmosphere in the city is reminiscent
of a battlefield say residents against the soundtrack of massive
gunfire."

"Tensions between the warring factions escalated
after an attempt on the life of Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh in
Gaza on Thursday raised the already considerable tensions in Gaza."

"RAMALLAH, West Bank - Palestinian president
Mahmud Abbas said Friday he “regretted” an attack on
prime minister Ismail Haniya’s convoy in Gaza in which one
person was killed ... Hamas accused Abbas’s own presidential
guard of firing on the convoy in a bid to assassinate the Islamist
premier, a charge categorically denied by the presidential guard.
Haniya’s son was injured and a bodyguard killed in the shootout
that is likely to exacerbate tensions between Hamas and Abbas’s
Fatah party.

"Israel had closed the border in a bid prevent
Haniya entering Gaza with 'tens of millions of dollars' after a
regional fund-raising trip."

Watch this civil war closely, for it could precipitate
the coming Middle East War.

Never have I seen evidence so striking, so
powerful, of the prophesied Apostasy of the Church (2 Thess 2:3)
which was to herald the actual arrival of the End of the Age. Never
would have I ever seen such incredible images of Satan inside a
Protestant Church!

--------Concluding
Inspiration ---------------"But their eyes were holden that
they should not know Him." Luke
24:16

The disciples ought to have known Jesus, they had
heard His voice so often, and gazed upon that marred face so frequently,
that it is wonderful they did not discover Him. Yet is it not so
with you also? You have not seen Jesus lately. You have been to
His table, and you have not met Him there. You are in a dark trouble
this evening, and though He plainly says, "It is I, be not
afraid," yet you cannot discern Him.

Alas! our eyes are held. We know His voice; we have
looked into His face; we have leaned our head upon His bosom, and
yet, though Christ is very near us, we are saying "O that I
knew where I might find Him!" We should know Jesus, for we
have the Scriptures to reflect His image, and yet how possible it
is for us to open that precious book and have no glimpse of the
Wellbeloved!

Dear child of God, are you in that state? Jesus feedeth
among the lilies of the word, and you walk among those lilies, and
yet you behold Him not. He is accustomed to walk through the glades
of Scripture, and to commune with His people, as the Father did
with Adam in the cool of the day, and yet you are in the garden
of Scripture, but cannot see Him, though He is always there. And
why do we not see Him? It must be ascribed in our case, as in the
disciples', to unbelief. They evidently did not expect to see Jesus,
and therefore they did not know Him. To a great extent in spiritual
things we get what we expect of the Lord. Faith alone can bring
us to see Jesus. Make it your prayer, "Lord, open Thou mine
eyes, that I may see my Saviour present with me."

It is a blessed thing to want to see Him; but oh!
it is better far to gaze upon Him. To those who seek Him He is kind;
but to those who find Him, beyond expression is He dear! (C.H. Spurgeon,
"Morning
and Evening Devotions")