> Linux is a good Unix. if adding "enterpriseness" means violating its > Unixness, then yes, the goals are bullshit. in particular, the kind> of extensive, kernel-based auditing and accounting some people talk about, > as well as the complete evisceration of the Unix design for security, > would make Linux no Unix at all. that would be very bad, and indeed Multics> is a fine example of the kind of history we should not repeat.

Are you one of those people who say X11 sucks? And whole idea of aneworked gui sucks? Like ones who threaten to rewrite entire gui withoutplanning, in OpenGL and use the rest of the energy tarishing X?Well, if it is done, probably you won't have to compile those extensionsin anyway, so what's the whining about? Enterprise level features willlet linux run on Mainframes not in pitiful x86 emulation mode, with hotswappable hardware. Just like raid. Would you say RAID sucks a** andweighs down linux, because it is an enterprise feature? By the tone ofyour voice it seems so.I am for a concious featurism, add features as long as others are stableand fixed(not in MS way)

pavel

-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" inthe body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.orgPlease read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/