Sunday, November 30, 2008

What happened to the anti-imperialist anti-Zionist pro-Palestinian heritage of India? First, we might want to start with Gandhi. Towards the end of 1947, Gandhi made his statement, in response to a question by Doon Campbell of Reuters.

"It has become a problem which seems almost insoluble. If I were a Jew, I would tell them: 'Do not be so silly as to resort to terrorism...' The Jews should meet the Arabs, make friends with them and not depend on British aid or American aid, save what descends from Jehovah."It is interesting to note that Gandhi recognized the actions of the Zionists in the 1940s as "terrorism." On January 31, 1948 barely months later, a man by the name Nathuram Godse shot Gandhi.

The ruling elite's in India and Israel should be easily able to find common ground, since most of those elite seem to be racists and bigots.

From India's caste system, with its degrees of ritual purity and of social status, from the Brahmans to the Untouchables to the Apartheid Jews only State of Israel, with their Rabbis who help formulate law to their version of the untouchables, the indigenous Palestinians, these two countries seem like a good fit for one another.

To help maintain their grip on power, they need "terrorists" incidents and other brazen acts to keep the people in a state of fear, crying out to the same ones who were behind those acts for help.

Israeli agents seemed particulary interested in getting their tentacles into India, especially Kashmir the year prior to 9/11.

To help set up the MOSSAD/CIA false-flag of 9/11?(This is a lengthy article, so only part of it is copied here.)

Meanwhile, politically the BJP has embraced Israel and turned a cold shoulder to the Palestinians, betraying the bonds of friendship shared by the Palestinian and Indian people in this process. Hindutva ideologues are talking about Hindu-Yahudi unity and the need to fight against ‘terrorism,’ a euphemism for Palestine’s and India’s Muslims. Hindu extremist websites gloat about the need to work together with Israel to target Muslims in South Asia. Recently a virulent organization calling itself "hinduunity.org" had its website shut down. It came back without a problem when the virulent Jewish extremist Kahane organization (Haktiva) came to the rescue. Rabid extremists working together for a common cause: Muslims are the targets, but also most importantly, the entire peoples of the Arab and Iranian nations, and the great masses of people in South Asia are targets for these two running dogs of American imperialism. Hindutvadis are happy to see such cooperation, while Israel murders Palestinians with impunity, and India reels under the Hindutva onslaught.

Israel has also been suspected of involvement in the incitement of virulent anti-Muslim activities in India, as has been pointed out by Faisal Kutty, a writer from Kerala state who noted that a meeting took place, shrouded in secrecy between BJP high officials and Israeli officials preceding a completely uncharacteristic violent communal anti-Muslim riot in the normally peaceful and harmonious state of Kerala in 1992.

Kerala’s Muslims are the oldest Muslim community in India, tracing their roots to the early Arab Muslim traders who plied the Indian Ocean Arabian Sea trade route. They make up 20 percent of the population in Kerala while Hindus are 60 percent and Christians 20 percent. Kerala has the highest rate of literacy in the country, in no small part due to the work of the ruling Communist Party over the last several decades to build a literate and thriving, secular state. Comparatively, the other South Indian states under the heel of chauvinistic ethnocentric parties have no comparable achievements. Faisal Kutty also notes that the first serious communal clash between Sri Lankan Tamil Hindus and Muslims occurred shortly after the opening of an Israeli interests section in the U.S. Embassy in Colombo. The section was later closed by the Sri Lankan government.

These suspicions cannot be unfounded because of similar reports about Israeli agents wandering in Kashmir as well as the BJP government’s fascination with ‘security cooperation,’ a code word for ‘how to keep the natives in line,’ and the overt statements made by Hindutva ideologues about "Hindu-Yahudi" unity. Recently the BJP has built close security ties with the U.S. and Israel under the guise of "fighting terrorism." It is certain that this is a step towards turning India into a "security" state as both the U.S. and Israel will provide technological support in terms of arms, intelligence and who knows what else. This will most definitely be used in the BJP’s attack on India’s people, especially Muslims, Christians, Dalits, and anyone opposed to Hindutva, those they call with contempt, "pseudo-secularists." The people of Kashmir will no doubt also be targeted by these new alliances, as well as Andhra, Punjab, Assam and the North East where militant struggles for human rights and freedom have continued for most of the half century following the British exit.

Organizations like the Bajrang Dal, a Hindutva version of the Storm Troopers, the same group who last year burned to death an elderly Australian missionary and his children, also find inspiration and who knows what else in Zionist Israel. The Indian Express, June 30, 2000 had an article titled "Desi Mossad is getting ready at Bajrang Dal's Ayodhya camp." It begins: "I, as a member of Bajrang Dal, swear in the name of Lord Hanuman to always remain prepared to protect my country, religion and culture," 150 young men, between 15 and 21 years of age, recite in unison. On several occasions, the cadres and their leaders mention Israel and the Mossad as their inspiration.

‘Asked what he did at the camp, an activist whispers, "I am from the secret service of Bajrang Dal. Israel's Mossad is my inspiration. I can't tell you more.''

‘Dal leaders in their defence, cite example of Israel where all citizens have to undergo a mandatory training in physical fitness and arms handling. But, isn't Israel's geographical situation peculiar? "`India's even worse. Israel has threat only from outsiders while India faces threat from even those inhabiting it,'' Sharma replies.

These are words from people who frequently terrorize India’s Muslims and Christians. They are the paramilitary mobs of Hindutva, not boy scouts or martial artists.

In recent years Israeli "counter-terrorism" assistance is also being mobilized, most evidently in (though not restricted to) Jammu and Kashmir, where the government of India sees a political issue as a ‘security’ issue, in the age-old imperialistic tradition of ignoring the human, civil and political rights of the Kashmiri people while making every effort to suppress the voice of Kashmiris.

‘A high-level team of Israeli counter-terrorism experts is now touring Jammu and Kashmir and several other states in India at the invitation of Home Minister Lal Krishna Advani to make an assessment of New Delhi's security needs, high-level government sources said.’

‘The Israeli team, headed by Eli Katzir of the Counter-Terrorism Combat Unit of the Prime Minister's Office, includes a senior Israel Police commander and Israeli military intelligence officials. The team will prepare a "feasibility study" of Indian security needs and assess the areas in which Israel can offer assistance to New Delhi in tackling the activities of insurgent and terrorist groups.’

BJP’s corruption: money for nothing, and a few lousy Barak missiles, Hindutva Zionism in action.

In the short span of time that the BJP has been in power in Delhi, its claims of being patriotic and honest have been thrown in the dustbin. Earlier this year, a team of investigative journalists videotaped a series of bribe taking and bribe negotiating episodes involving people in the highest levels of government including the armed forces. Using a fictitious arms deal the team easily bribed its way into the offices of high-ranking Indian officials in the armed forces and the government. The ease with which it was possible to bribe these officials shocked the country. Imagine what levels of corruption might be possible when very efficient efforts at the same are carried out by international professional arms dealers, mercenaries and other organizations?

The most damaging episode in this was a videotaped recording of the leader of the BJP, yes, the party leader, taking a wad of money and also mentioning that he prefers dollars! Overnight, the BJP’s never ending charade of patriotism and honesty turned into outright guilt and defensive noises about ‘foreign conspiracy!’ As if the taking of bribes by the highest officials of the land especially for defense related deals, itself does not constitute treason and conspiracy of the highest order! These so-called ‘patriots’ of the BJP are willing to send Indian soldiers as cannon fodder to their stupid warmongering disasters, with equipment that is sub standard, and available only because the officials procuring them were bribed into doing so. Thus the so-called Barak missile found its way from Israel to India, while India’s own Trishul missile, which outperforms the Barak, got pushed out, perhaps because the Indian defense industries couldn’t match the Mossadis in bribery and intrigue!?

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Because of Rumpelstiltskin's odd name, magical powers involving gold and attempted theft of a human child, some critics have also interpreted the story in the context of medieval German anti-semitism.

Hell, what's next? Will the ADL swoop down ASPCA sites and accuse them of infringing on the Holocaust™ since these places use carbon monoxide gas to kill off unwanted pets?

Zionist front groups like the ADL are getting a bit edgy these days, since the wonders of the Internet have broken their monopoly over the news and people around the world are reading REAL news and not Zionist/Israeli filtered BS that always portrays Jews and Israel as being the perpetual underdog who is never at fault for whatever happens.

Most people, if they have been kicked out of various countries, states or nations repeatedly over the centuries, will do some soul searching to try and discover what makes them so universally reviled.

Maybe the concept of a soul is too deep or maybe an artifical concept for those "Masters of the Universe."

These legends reflect an anti-Jewish sentiment long exhibited by European Christians. These tales, like their witchcraft analogs, illustrate a tragic and lengthy chapter in ecclesiastical history. Archives, like microscopes, often reveal root causes of sickness and evil. Our best hope of correcting the errors of the past lies in exposing their root causes to the light ofday.

Friday, November 28, 2008

Some of the best--for adrenalin junkie firefighters-- fires we had at the ********* Fire Department were arson fires.

And the best of that bunch was when the arsonist was so skillful, he/she never left any evidence..yes, a full blown fire can leave evidence, if you know where to look.

And the best of the best arsonists would torch several structures in town, around the same time, so that the one fire he was getting paid for didn't stick out.

The business might be imploding or there might have been a theft, but that was all washed away with the skillfulness of the arsonist.

We'd know a torch had lit the place up, but could never prove it.

And that's what the Bush/Cheney Junta is doing: setting off arson fires all over the damned place to cover up their thefts of trillions and trillions of dollars.

The biggest of these fires was the inside job of 9/11. That arson allowed the Bush/Cheney Junta to go on a sanctioned rampage, invading countries for fun and proft... And for Empire and Israel.

The anthrax attacks was another of those arson jobs. Fear is a powerful motivator and the Bush/Cheney gang knew how to scare the crap out of people, all to divert attention from the crimes being committed.

Fear that was pushed non-stop by state sanctioned news outlets like FUX and CNN. Fear that was used to shred the Bill of Rights. Can't have no nambie-pambies getting in the way of the DC kleptocrats.

Another staged fire was the mortgage backed security implosion, which is allowing the Bush/Cheney mob to steal this country blind, all in an effort to douse the fire they started....But the fire won't be extinguished until the USA has been completely gutted.

We know they're stealing the money, but can't really prove it outright.

Besides, the wolf is baying at the door and right now, you've got other things to worry about.

What follows is intended to be used to "prevent" fires and should not be used in any other way!

P.S. When some people run into troubles, they "accidentally" light a fire in their house and let the insurance company buy the place.

Some of the more boneheaded amateurs start a fire in more than one place.

That's a BIG hint to the arson investigator that there's monkey business afoot, but you'd be surprised how many people try that.

Another way people get nabbed is to move out stereos, color tv's, pianos, guitars, etc. Things of value that the person wanted to save.

And that's how many an arsonist gets caught. The insurance company will know what you're claiming in the fire as a loss and you'd better believe that they have ways to find out whether or not that plasma TV was consumed by the fire.

The Average Joe, like the Bushies, tend to get greedy when their house "accidentally" catches fire.

Some will try and lie their way out of the fire that got "accidentally" started.

The FD arson investigators, the State Fire Marshal's office and the insurance company guys will see right thru the lies and hang your ass out to dry.

Some people are savvy and get caught up in everyday activity and that gets a fire "accidentally" started.

If say, a cigarette "accidentally" dropped into the sofa--one of those with cloth covering and foam rubber padding will burn like the dickens--and say that sofa hadn't been cleaned out for awhile and maybe even had some dryer lint behind the cushions where the cigarette "accidentally" dropped and say the sofa was surrounded by some newspapers you'd read, but hadn't moved, well if that happened, admit to smoking that cigarette and say, "Dammit, I was on the sofa, yes I was smoking and i was getting sleepy, so i went to bed. Next thing I know, the living room's on fire and I'm trying to save my life."

The smart ones own up to the fire as being some kinda dumbass, boneheaded move by the occupant. Hard for the insurance company to bust thru that, since it's technically not a lie.

And of course, you probably got some smoke alarms, battery powered, but you needed the battery for something and forgot to replace it. So the alarms didn't wake you up.

Or say you were working in the basement, with a propane torch and kinda got careless and started a fire down there close to some other combustibles and well, shit happened and you don't know what happened, but you were using the torch to do this or that and I'll be damned if I know. And yes, you do recycle and kept a bunch of cardboard and newspapers down there to recycle.

To make things even more interesting, say the fire started in a room that had several hundred rounds of rifle ammo--.22 caliber is good and shotgun shells.

When those fuckers start heating up and popping off, I'll guarantee you no firefighter in his right mind will enter that building. Which leaves more than a few that might try.

Another item that will explode when exposed to severe heat is spray paint, the kind in those hand held containers people use to brush up stuff or paint bikes, furniture, etc.They'll leave a loud enough BOOM to make a firefightng crew pull the hell out of that room.

Which means that no one will be attacking the base of the fire, which means the fire will grow and spread. Which means the FD will have to resort to exterior firefighting, which means that what the fire doesn't destroy, the water will.

Some use carbon based fuels like gasoline or diesel and get their ass nabbed every time. Some of the better pro's use on site combustibles. One caveat to this rule: If you have one of those kerosene heaters that are safe to use inside, you wouldn't believe what one guy did, poured gasoline into that fucker to burn.. It burned alright. Very, very dangerous.

Another curious thing is that around 3 am is when your circadian sleep cycle makes you the most vulnerable, including firefighters who tend to make more mistakes at that time.

Fires that "accidentally" start when the ground, especially the roof, are covered with snow... ice is better, are more difficult to extinguish.

And never have one of these "accidental" fires if you're behind on your mortgage or have been falling behind. That's a red flag to investigators who will really start crawling up your arse.

Remember, all of these scenarios are only offered to help you "prevent" fires.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Hmm, trillions and trillions of dollars of OUR money that is being given, with and will continue to be given to the Wall Street banksters, with no oversight in place, even though it was mandated by the same law that put the No Banker Left Behind Act into existence.

Huh, wonder why Congress is dragging its feet over this matter? Maybe they trust this same gang of rapacious thieves to do the right thing this time around, ya' think?

Gosh, you don't think some untoward activity is going on in and around Wall and Market Street, do you?

I'm shocked, shocked to find that corruption is going on in here." (Apologies to Claude Rains and the movie, "Casablanca.")

All those American flags Wall Street displays, flapping in the breeze, must mean they're true blue patriotic Americans and wouldn't think of stealing large sums of money, right.

By the time that bunch of pirates get thru scooting all of those trillions of dollars of OUR money offshore, into secretive tax free banking havens, we'll be lucky to have any clothes on our back, let alone two pockets to check and see if there's any change left.

Welcome to the holocaust, American style

The altar is located in Wall Street and what's being burnt is our future.

By the time this heist is thru, this holocaust will be protetcted by the Kabbalistic significant number 6, as in SIX TRILLION DOLLARS.

Gone. Forever. Sacrificed to Mammonism.

But not to worry, all the right sound bites are being offered up by the banksters cohorts in this massive swindle, the U.S. Congress

In the six weeks since lawmakers approved the Treasury's massive bailout of financial firms, the government has poured money into the country's largest banks, recruited smaller banks into the program and repeatedly widened its scope to cover yet other types of businesses, from insurers to consumer lenders.

Along the way, the Bush administration has committed $290 billion of the $700 billion rescue package.

Yet for all this activity, no formal action has been taken to fill the independent oversight posts established by Congress when it approved the bailout to prevent corruption and government waste. Nor has the first monitoring report required by lawmakers been completed, though the initial deadline has passed.

"It's a mess," said Eric M. Thorson, the Treasury Department's inspector general, who has been working to oversee the bailout program until the newly created position of special inspector general is filled. "I don't think anyone understands right now how we're going to do proper oversight of this thing."

In approving the rescue package, lawmakers trumpeted provisions in the legislation that established layers of independent scrutiny, including a special inspector general to be nominated by the White House and a congressional oversight panel to be named by lawmakers themselves.

Some lawmakers and their aides fear that political squabbling on Capitol Hill and bureaucratic logjams could delay their work for months. Meanwhile, the Congressional Budget Office, which also has some oversight responsibilities, is worried about the difficulty of hiring people who can understand the intensely complicated financial work involved.

Sen. Charles E. Grassley, the ranking member on the Finance Committee said “ Considering how taxpayers' money around Washington isn't respected, a day shouldn't go by without having an inspector general checking on it."....

Except that article is about Israeli homes foreclosed on YEARS ago, not now and didn't give any numbers.

Israeli homeowners don't appear to be the crosshairs of their financial institutions like millions are in America. Why is that?

Maybe Uncle Sam can stop those yearly welfare checks to Israel and in a show of appreciation for all the support America has given that racist and apartheid nation, Israel will now start repaying back some of those trillions of dollars we've gave them.

Besides, if an Israeli family did lose their home, they could always steal another residence from a hapless Palestinian family.

Actually, most of these new homes are NOT in Israel; they are for Israelis moving into settlements on Palestinian land under a land acquisition program considered illegal by every civilized western nation, except ours. So while your friend and neighbor is packing up, or while the little old couple’s house down the street sits vacant, I want you to know what your tax dollars are paying for. They’re paying for the eviction of a carpenter or a fisherman in Palestine. A family that has never raised a hand in anger toward us or Israel for that matter. Your tax dollars ultimately pay for the bulldozers that knock down their home and for the Israeli carpenters who build another on the land. Another home to hand over to a “settler” family for next to nothing so that Israel can get a deeper hold on another nation’s land. They build these illegal settlements on hillsides and they put up Israeli flags and they deem, under no rule of international law, that the land is then the sovereign soil of Israel. Even their outgoing Prime Minister has stated that this practice is wrong and must stop.

This national speaking tour will bring internationally recognized human rights advocates Rev. Eddie Makue and Diana Buttu to 11 U.S. cities between November 10th and 23rd, 2008.

Faith communities, the African-American community, and students will be the heart of this tour, as we work to educate Americans about the similarities between life under South Africa's apartheid regime and life for Israelis and Palestinians living under the Israeli government's ethnic separation policies.

The Internet is an effective way of getting information to people, but it is no substitute for local activism. To raise public awareness and bring pressure to bear to change US policy, people must meet together, strategize, and plan how to put that information to good use.

Step 1: Getting Started

Step 2: Forming Your Group

Step 3: Growing Your Group

Step 4: Actions Your Group Can Do

[For more information on how to start your own organization, please contact US Campaign's National Membership & Outreach Coordinator, Omar Masri, at office@endtheoccupation.org. ]

One of the speakers, Diania Buttu, is one face of Palestine that the Zionist controlled MSM hopes you never see. She is articulate, intelligent, speaks fluent English and comes across as highly knowledgeable about the Israeli Occupation of Palestine.

Who is Diana Buttu? She's caught the eye of CAMERA, a Zionist propaganda out fit, as the article below shows.

A Canadian of Palestinian descent, Buttu holds undergraduate, graduate, and law degrees from the University of Toronto, Ontario's Queen's University and California's Stanford University. In addition to serving in a legal capacity, Buttu is media advisor and spokesperson for the PA and is frequently interviewed and quoted in the Western media as an authority on international law and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

On Palestinian Refugees & Right of Return

Buttu alleges that Israel "ethnically cleansed" 75 percent of Palestinians in 1948 because of their religion. For instance, on CNN's "Q&A with Jim Clancy," she avered:

Let's remember that 75 percent of the Palestinian Christian and Muslim population were ethnically cleansed from their homelands back in 1948 and have never been allowed to return for one reason and only one reason, and that is because they are the wrong religion, they're not Jewish. If they were Jewish, they'd be allowed to return to their homes, but because they're not Jewish, Israel continues to bar them from returning to their homes... Palestinians will simply not acquiesce to being ethnically cleansed from their homes. (May 26, 2003)

FACTS: Buttu combines several fraudulent claims. The term "ethnic cleansing," which refers to the forcible expulsion of an ethnic group, is used by anti-Israel and anti-Jewish propagandists to suggest racism by the Jewish state.

But, by and large, the Palestinians refugees were not forcibly expelled, and certainly none were sent to concentration camps. They became refugees as they fled–often despite the counsel of their Jewish neighbors to stay–a war launched by their Arab brethren and leaders.

On May 14, 1948, the day the British Mandate expired, the Jewish People's Council approved a proclamation declaring the establishment of the State of Israel. The declaration included the following appeal to the non-Jews living there–something hardly suggestive of a nation planning to "ethnically cleanse" another population because of its religion:

We appeal–in the very midst of the onslaught launched against us now for months–to the Arab inhabitants of the State of Israel to preserve peace and participate in the upbuilding of the State on the basis of full and equal citizenship and due representation in all its provisional and permanent institutions.

But almost immediately, five neighboring Arab armies invaded and attacked the new country. Hundreds of thousands of local Arabs fled, many at the behest of their leaders. Only in very few cases, primarily due to military exigencies, were any of them forced out of their homes.

Estimates of the total number of Arab refugees vary from 472,000 (1948 Progress Report of the United Nations Mediator on Palestine) to 726,000 (1949 U.N. Economic Survey Mission), with the most reliable estimate, 550,000, obtained by comparing pre-and post-1948 census figures. (All estimates constitute a considerably lower percentage of the total non-Jewish population than the figure of 75 percent that Buttu alleges.)

Buttu's argument that Palestinian refugees cannot return to their homes because they are "the wrong religion" is similarly false. Israel offered to repatriate 100,000 Palestinian refugees during the 1949 Lausanne negotiations even prior to official discussion of the refugee question, but the Arab states rejected the offer because it would have implicitly recognized Israel's existence. Nevertheless, Israel allowed over 50,000 refugees to return to Israel under a family reunification program, and after 1967 allowed a further 165,000 to return to the West Bank and Gaza.

Buttu argues that the Palestinians' right to return to Israel's borders is guaranteed under international law and is in violation of U.N. Resolution 194 to which she claims Israel was bound. On USA Today's "Talk Today," she claimed:

All civilians who flee during war are entitled, under international humanitarian law, to return to their homes. Israel agreed to this in UN Resolution 194 but, of course, has NEVER allowed Palestinian refugees to return to their homes because they are the wrong religion. Anywhere else in the world, this would be considered intolerable discrimination. But, not in Israel. (May 2, 2002)

FACTS: The key document on which Buttu bases her claim, U.N. Resolution 194, was rejected by all the Arab states representing the Palestinians specifically because it did not establish a "right of return," and because it implicitly recognized Israel. It is therefore disingenuous and hypocritical for those same Arab states and Palestinian representatives to reverse their position now that it suits them.

Moreover, the Arab states continually violated the resolution's central provision, which called for the creation of a Conciliation Commission and:

... establishment of contact between the parties themselves and the Commission at the earliest possible date ... to seek agreement by negotiations [and thereby reach] a final settlement of all questions between them. (paragraphs 4 and 5)

The Arab states, however, consistently refused even to meet with Israel, much less try to reach a peaceful settlement. In fact, the only clause the Arab side ever acknowledged was paragraph 11, which suggested (it could not "require," since it was a General Assembly rather than a Security Council resolution) that:

refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date ... [R]epatriation, resettlement and economic and social rehabilitation of refugees and payment of compensation [should be facilitated]. (emphasis added)

This recommendation that refugees be "permitted" to return can hardly be characterized as creating a "right"–even more so, because returnees were required to first accept living "at peace with their neighbors," something very few were willing to do. Furthermore, the recommendation did not even hint at any return rights for descendants of refugees.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

The terrorists on this list have been indicted by sitting Federal Grand Juries in various jurisdictions in the United States for the crimes reflected on their wanted posters. Evidence was gathered and presented to the Grand Juries, which led to their being charged. The indictments currently listed on the posters allow them to be arrested and brought to justice. Future indictments may be handed down as various investigations proceed in connection to other terrorist incidents, for example, the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 and the pre-planned 9/11/2008 implosion of Wall Street and subsequent theft of nearly 10 TRILLION dollars from Americans.

These Bin Ladens have been spotted by the FBI and are armed with Mortgage Backed Securities, derivatives and the ability to pass laws to cover up their criminal activities.They are considered dangerous as they keep threatening to smash the world's economy.

Their ability to move vast sums of wealth offshore into secretive tax free banking institutions should not be underestimated.

The fiendish heads of this mob family are these three associates, who have been indicted for carrying on a continuing criminal enterprise under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970, or as its more commonly known by the initials RICCO.

Cheney Bin Killing

Bush Bin Stealing

Condi Bin Lying

Paulson Bin Conning

Along with these known conspirators they pal around with:

Bin Laden Greenberg

Bin Laden Fuld

Bin Laden Bernanke

Bin Laden Pelosi

Bin Laden Reid

DO NOT approach these dangerous felons on your own, get help.

Together, these native terrorists have managed to steal this nation blind and have brought the country to the brink of another Great Depression.

The FBI has credible intelligence that these Bin Laden's plan on setting off another 9/11 false-flag event inside America to disguise Wall Street and Washington, D.C. criminal activity and to scare Americans into focusing on some other event and not feel that hand in their pocket, rummaging around for any spare change we might have left.

Contact your local FBI office if you know the whereabouts of these wanted terrorists.

NOTICE: This bulletin will go into effect when the FBI changes from being a political club and shield of the real felons and into a an actual crime fighting organization. Until then, this will be considered satire.

How can RICCO be used?

Los Angeles Times Thursday January 21, 1999

WASHINGTON--The Supreme Court gave consumers a powerful legal weapon against fraud in the insurance industry Wednesday, ruling that the insurers can be sued for damages under the federal anti-racketeering law.

Until now, most courts had said that insurers are governed by state regulation and are immune from federal lawsuits.

However, in a unanimous decision, the justices cleared the way for 84,000 policyholders in Nevada to sue the giant health insurer Humana Inc. over allegations of a secret kickback scheme that allowed the company to reap huge profits.

One month after the inauguration of Abraham Lincoln, the first shots of the American Civil War were fired at Fort Sumter, South Carolina on April 12,1861. ...

Certainly slavery was a cause for the Civil War, but not the primary cause. Lincoln knew that the economy of the South depended upon slavery and so (before the Civil War) he had no intention of eliminating it. Lincoln had put it this way in his inaugural address only one month earlier:

"I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it now exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."

Even after the first shots were fired at Fort Sumter, Lincoln continued to insist that the Civil War was not about the issue of slavery:

"My paramount objective is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it."

So what was the Civil War all about? There were many factors at play. Northern industrialists had used protective tariffs to prevent their southern states from buying cheaper European goods. Europe retaliated by stopping cotton imports from the South. The Southern states were in a financial bind. They were forced to pay more for most of the necessities of life while their income from cotton exports plummeted. The South grew ncreasingly angry.

But there were other factors at work. ... The central bankers now saw an pportunity to use the North/South divisions to split the rich new nation - t divide and conquer by war. Was this just some sort of wild conspiracy theory? Well, let's look at what a well placed observer of the scene had to say at time.

This was Otto von Bismarck, Chancellor of Germany, the man who united the German states in 1871. A few years later, in 1876, he is quoted as saying:

"It is not to be doubted, I know of absolute certainty," Bismarck declared, "that the division of the United States into two federations of equal power was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained as one block and were to develop as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset the capitalist domination of Europe over the world."

Within months after the first shots were fired at Fort Sumter, the central bankers loaned Napoleon III of France (the nephew of the Waterloo Napoleon) 210 million francs to seize Mexico and station troops along the southern border of the U.S., taking advantage of the Civil War to violate the Monroe Doctrine and return Mexico to colonial rule.

No matter what the outcome of the Civil War, it was hoped that a war-weakened America, heavily indebted to the Money Changers, would open up Central and South America once again to European colonization and domination.

At the same time, Great Britain moved 11,000 troops into Canada and positioned them along America's northern border. The British fleet went on war alert should their quick intervention be called for.

Lincoln knew he was in a bind. He agonized over the fate of the Union. There was a lot more to it than just differences between the North and the South. That's why his emphasis was always on "Union" and not merely the defeat of the South. But Lincoln needed money to win.

In 1861, Lincoln and his Secretary of the Treasury, Salmon P. Chase, went to New York to apply for the necessary war loans. The Money Changers, anxious to maximize their war profits, only offered loans at 24-36% interest. Lincoln said thanks, but no thanks, and returned to Washington. He sent for an old friend, Colonel Dick Taylor of Chicago, and put him onto the problem off financing the War. At one particular meeting, Lincoln asked Taylor how else to finance the war. Taylor put it this way:

"Why, Lincoln, that is easy; just get Congress to pass a bill authorizing the printing of full legal tender treasury notes... pay your soldiers with them and go ahead and win your war with them also."

When Lincoln asked if the people of the United States would accept the notes, Taylor said:

"The people or anyone else will not have any choice in the matter, if you make them full legal tender. They will have the full sanction of the government and be just as good as any money ... the stamp of full legal tender by the Government is the thing that makes money good any time, and this will always be as good as any other money inside the borders of our country."

So that's exactly what Lincoln did. From 1862 to 1865, with Congressional authorization, he printed up $432,000,000 of the new bills.

In order to distinguish them from private bank notes in circulation, he had them printed with green ink on the back side. That's why the notes were called "Greenbacks." With this new money, Lincoln paid the troops, and bought their supplies. During the course of the war, nearly all of the 450 million dollars of Greenbacks authorized by Congress were printed at no interest to the federal government.

By now Lincoln realized who was really pulling the strings and what was at stake for the American people. ... This is how he explained his monetary views:

"The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers... The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity... By the adoption of these principles, the long-felt want for a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. The financing of all public enterprises, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity."

Meanwhile in Britain a truly incredible editorial in the London Times explained the Bank of England's attitude towards Lincoln's Greenbacks.

"If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become indurate down to a fixture, then the Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

Keep in mind, by this time the European monarchs were already chained to their private central banks, hence the bankers' concern to preserve their captive monarchs. Within four days of the passage of the law that allowed Greenbacks to be issued, bankers met in convention in Washington to discuss the situation. It was agreed that Greenbacks would surely be their ruin. Something had to be done. They devised a scheme gradually to undermine the value of the Greenbacks.

Seemingly unimportant limitations on the use of Greenbacks (printed on the green back), insisted on by the bankers, forbidding their use to pay import duties and interest on the public debt, were utilized by the banks to slap a surcharge on Greenbacks of up to 185%. This undermined the confidence of the people in Greenbacks and necessitated further concessions to the bankers to obtain more, discounted as the Greenbacks now were.

This scheme was effective - so effective that the next year, 1863, with Federal and Confederate troops beginning to mass for the decisive battle of the Civil War, and the Treasury in need of further Congressional authority at that time to issue more Greenbacks, Lincoln gave in to the pressure, which he described:

"They persist, they have argued me almost blind - I am worse off than St. Paul. He was in a strait between two. I am in a strait between twenty and they are bankers and financiers."

Lincoln allowed the bankers to push through the National Banking Act of 1863 in exchange for their support for the urgently needed additional Greenbacks. This act created "National Banks" (hence the N.A. still in use after National banks' names) and gave them a virtual tax-free status. The new banks also got the exclusive power to create the new form of money - National Bank Notes. Though Greenbacks continued to circulate, their quantity was limited and no more were authorized after the war.

The ones who REALLY pull the strings in politics are the ones who pull the PURSE strings. Sharon, Bush, Blair and their ilk are merely puppets. The REAL tyrants - the Mammonites, the Plutocrats, the gazillionaires – almost always remain nameless!

Monday, November 10, 2008

Channel 10 on Thursday released footage taken by Israel Defense Forces soldiers of themselves humiliating a bound and blindfolded Palestinian man at a West Bank checkpoint.The footage shows the Palestinian kneeling and repeating sentences given to him to say by the soldiers, who belong to the Golani infantry brigade.

One of the lines is: "Golani will bring you a log to stick up your ass."

As the detainee repeats the words, the soldiers are heard laughing raucously in the background.

Later Thursday, the army issued a harsh condemnation of the troops' actions.

"The IDF views this incident gravely and condemns it. Behavior of this kind goes against IDF values and its soldiers' expected norms of behavior," the IDF Spokesman's Unit said in a statement it released.

The IDF said it was unaware of the incident until it received the clip from Channel 10, after which it immediately began an investigation.

"With the emergence of all of the details, it will be decided whether to take steps and which [to take]. The IDF denunciates this behavior," the statement said.

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Whatever happened to "Feed the Hungry, Tend to the Sick, Shelter the Homeless?"

This topic might not deal directly with the Federal Reserve or Zionism, but it's entwined deeply with those two life stifling outfits.Without the mind numbing power of the Vatican brainwashing America's Catholics, the Fed and Zionism would be hard pressed to stay in existence.

The true story is about the Vatican and how that closed society of misogynist's and pedophiles rule with an iron fist over hundreds of millions of the world's poor, keeping them ignorant and poor, all in an effort to have a never ending supply of converts to their cult religion.

And a never ending supply of cannon fodder for wars for Empire.

Wars that the Vatican never seems to utter a peep about, not as long as those being butchered are Muslims.

I wasn't aware that one of the commandments had been changed from "Thou Shalt Not Kill," to "Thou Shalt not kill Christians and Jews."

The Sermons of Sister Jane

This is a story of love. The love of your fellow human beings. This is exemplified by one Sister Jane, former nun, who got booted out of her order after 58 years of service.

Towards the end of her 58 year long service as a nun to the Catholic Church, Sister Jane started asking questions about how she was raised as a Catholic.

About the same time, she discovered that the local priest was stealing money from the Church and raping young boys. She brought her concerns to the bishop, who ignored her, then to the pope, who ignored her.

Troubled by what was still going on, she turned to a local reporter and when he started investigating, the shit hit the fan, Turns out the priest was rapist and a thief and was having a torrid affair with the bishop Sister Jane had contacted.

For pointing out a viper in their midst, she gets the boot out of the Church, after 58 years of loyal service.

These days, Jane spends her time with a local Plowshares facility, where she "Feeds the hungry, tends to the sick and helps shelter the homeless."

And isn't that what it's supposed to be all about?

When Sister Jane discovered that a priest in her church was molesting young men and stealing from the congregation, and when the evidence was ignored by the church, she contacted the press, creating a scandal.

Throughout the film she shares her progressive views on issues such as birth control, homosexuality, and women priests. She impels the Catholic Church to return to egalitarian roots of community.

The scenes filmed at Plowshares, an organization she created to feed and serve the poor and homeless, demonstrate Sister Jane’s powerful ability to translate her faith into profoundly meaningful action.

This touching documentary, skillfully produced by these acclaimed filmmakers, reveals Sister Jane’s long struggle to speak out against what she believed was wrong, and how this ongoing battle ultimately has heart-breaking results.

Saturday, November 8, 2008

This battle to take back our republic isn't over, it's just barely begun.

If We the People are truly interested in saving our democratic republic from Wall Street con artists, grifters and thieves, then the same enthusiasm, vigor and outrage that was shown during the Congressional hearings on the No Banker Left Behind Act needs to be kept on full throttle.

Some of those congressional quislings that ignored the voter's flood of emails, calls and faxes saying in no uncertain terms they were AGAINST bailing out Wall Street got their walking papers November 4.

We need to keep reminding the rest that business as usual will NOT be tolerated.

We the People need to keep holding Washington's feet to the fire and not ask, but demand REAL change and not some empty slogan.

If we go back to being passive dullards that show more interest in Madonna or Britney or the latest TV reality show, then we might as well turn out the lights now.

Americans are supposed to be woefully lacking in historical knowledge.

Go back to sleep, America and we'll all get a real life history lesson on something called the "Great Depression."

Bailing Out Bankrupt Ideology By Arun GuptaOctober 27, 2008 issue

Don’t believe the financial press when it says the Department of the Treasury “quietly nationalized much of the U.S. banking system” on Oct. 14. And don’t believe anyone administered last rites to capitalism or neoliberalism.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s plan is not only highway robbery, it shows that capital is profiting off the disaster it helped create and government is still relying on the bankrupt ideology of self-regulating markets to solve the problem.

John Kanas, former CEO of North Fork Bancorp, summed up the plan as “a pretty good deal for the recipients and probably a pretty tough deal for taxpayers.” He added, “It seems quite explicit that there’s no strings attached to this money …. It seems like a gift.”

The Paulson plan offers little public ownership other than absorbing the banks’ losses. It may seem to be a nationalization because the Treasury is injecting capital in banks for equity stakes, instead of the original plan of buying only toxic mortgage backed securities. But don’t cry for the banks. The New York Times noted the first phase of the plan will “provide $125 billion to nine banks on terms that were more favorable than they would have received in the marketplace.”

When the chiefs of the nine banks met with the Treasury on Oct. 13 they were told they “would pay a relatively modest 5 percent in annual dividend payments” to the U.S. government. In contrast, on Sept. 23 Warren Buffet announced he would invest $5 billion investment in Goldman Sachs, for which he received a 10 percent dividend.

The Treasury will buy “preferred shares” that have no voting rights, so it will have no real say in the institutions. This is opposed to the British plan to partially nationalize their banks, which involves buying preferred and common shares. The Treasury’s decision not to demand common shares effectively protects shareholders by propping up the stock prices of financial firms, rather than making them take a hit, as happened to the shareholders of British banks.

Paulson was unabashed about this lopsided deal when he introduced the plan on Oct. 14, saying, “We’re not looking to come in and take meaningful ownership percentages.”

A different deal, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group’s $9 billion investment in Morgan Stanley, reveals how the plan was rigged from the start. The Mitsubishi buyin was being negotiated right before the unveiling of the Treasury plan, which included injecting $10 billion into Morgan Stanley. At that point Morgan Stanley’s stock was in a tailspin. Afraid that Mitsubishi would walk away, the venerable Wall Street bank renegotiated the deal after “federal officials assured Mitsubishi that its investment [in Morgan Stanley] would be protected.”

Thus, the bailout appears designed to protect large investors like Mitsubishi and Buffet. Or as the Wall Street Journal put it, “To make sure private investors aren’t scared away,” the Treasury structured “its investment on terms favorable to the banks.”

LACK OF CONTROL

While some sort of government intervention was necessary to revive the credit sector, the Paulson plan is of dubious value. From a lack of controls over how banks will use the bailout funds to ineffective limits on executive compensation to a scaling back of investigations of Wall Street fraud, the operating principle of the bailout is to let the markets self-regulate.

Moreover, the Paulson plan fits into the neoliberal practice of private profit at public expense. Financial firms will profit both from the bailout itself and by getting paid fees to manage the taxpayer funds used to bail out banks.

In another favor to U.S. banks, they can keep paying dividends while the British plan mandates that “banks can’t pay shareholder dividends until they repay the preferred shares they are issuing to the government,” according to the Journal. So U.S. banks could use taxpayer money to pay shareholders instead of shoring up credit markets.

This lack of control over the bailout money may be the plan’s fatal flaw: The government “has offered no written requirements about how or when the banks must use the money.”

Former North Fork Bancorp CEO Kanas, said, “Banks are likely to use the government capital to retire outstanding debt that pays a higher yield than the 5 percent on the government’s preferred shares.” This will boost their profits while doing little for the overall economy. The banks could also use the money “to acquire weaker competitors … avoid painful cost-cutting” or just “sit on the capital.”

In one of the greatest absurdities, the banks that spawned much of this economic disaster will profit from managing the $700 billion bailout fund. Take the Bank of New York Mellon. It has been named the “master custodian firm” to manage the inflow and outflow of the fund, which is described as a “potentially lucrative assignment.” The Bank of New York Mellon is one of the first recipients of the capital infusion, having received $3 billion. Presumably, then, it will make money by managing the money that’s being used to bail it out.

Other banks are lining up at the trough. With “$700 billion to disburse,” reported the New York Times, “the plan could still generate tens of billions of dollars in fees if the firms negotiate anywhere close to their standard fees.”

And never mind talk about cutting the cords off golden parachutes and pinching executive pay. Neel Kashkari, a former Goldman Sachs executive handpicked by Paulson to manage the $700 billion fund from the Treasury side, told the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association the night before the U.S. House of Representatives rejected the first bailout bill that the restrictions would be “a pretty modest hindrance.”

This was no idle comment. Of the four provisions to crimp lavish payouts for senior executives, the only one with teeth is a ban on new golden parachutes (already existing parachutes are unaffected); the other three provisions are meaningless.

And it appears criminal behavior is being rewarded. Not one Wall Street executive has been forced to resign. The FBI has opened criminal investigations into Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG and Lehman Brothers, but these are all failed firms. There is no indication any firm still standing is being probed. Even more troubling, the Times reported that FBI officials worry that the bailout “may itself become a problem because it contains inadequate controls to deter fraud.”

The lack of controls and constraints on executive compensation are part of a broader counterattack to undermine greater domestic regulation and global oversight of the hidden markets behind the financial implosion. Neoliberalism will not go gently into the night gently. Its proponents still run the show, and perhaps they have abandoned their free-market rhetoric, but it’s only to salvage the monied interests.

Congressional Democrats are considering modest Keynesian-style public works projects, bolstered with increased unemployment benefits, tax cuts and aid to states. As for their standard-bearer, Barack Obama, his latest speech calling for quick action was full of half-measures like bankruptcy court adjustments for home owners, which is far less effective in supporting house prices than a new Home Owner’s Loan Corporation; corporate welfare, such as loan guarantees for automakers; and conservative ideas like “eliminating all capital gains taxes on investments in small businesses and start-up companies.”

Change is not going to happen because voters install a Democratic majority in Washington. It is nearly as beholden to corporate overlords and their free-market apostles as the Republicans.

http://www.indypendent.org/2008/10/24/bailing-out-bankrupt-ideology/

Arun Gupta, investigative journalist who is an editor with the New York Indypendent newspaper of the New York Independent Media Center. He is a former editor at the Guardian weekly in New York and writes frequently for Z Magazine, Left Turn and The Indypendent.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Want to start that Revolution? Start here and start NOW by helping kill the Beast known as rampant consumerism.

This Christmas, show the ones you love that you DO love care for them thru other, more personal means than by going to the malls and saying Charge It! And take a scissors to that deadly weapon of the Beast, the Credit Card.

AMEN, BROTHER!!

Refuse to visit malls this holiday season and never ever visit them again.

Don't buy new clothes, get them from a second hand store.

Only buy the absolute minimum to exist on and the Beast will eventually die from lack of nutrition. Once that Beast starts to expire, the rest of the blocks that support the MIC in never ending wars for Empire and Israel will start imploding.

Listen to the Most WHOLLY Reverend Billy tell you about salvation thru the Church of STOP SHOPPING.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Another day in Iraq and more reports of car bombs and other types of explosives placed near civilians going off and murdering Iraqi's.

Don't even think that this has anything to do with Iraq refusing to sign the quisling Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the U.S. that will give American occupation troops and mercenaries a free hand to do anything to anyone anytime in Iraq, without repercussion, just like it is now.

Just because this latest string of bomb attacks are targeting Iraqi's and not American Occupation Troops has nothing to do with these crimes.

BAGHDAD – A string of bombings killed nine people and wounded at least 33 others on Monday, including a senior Oil Ministry official, authorities said.

Six people died when two bombs — one of them hidden in a trash can — exploded in Tahariyat square in central Baghdad during the morning rush hour. Police said 21 people were wounded, including 10 policemen and two women.

Most of the blasts appear to be directed at Iraqi police and soldiers rather than U.S. troops.

It's always those damned blood crazed "Muzzies" that are behind this slaughter, like this article pretends to show:

BAGHDAD – A string of bombings killed nine people and wounded at least 33 others on Monday, including a senior Oil Ministry official, authorities said.Six people died when two bombs — one of them hidden in a trash can — exploded in Tahariyat square in central Baghdad during the morning rush hour. Police said 21 people were wounded, including 10 policemen and two women.

The explosions caused extensive damage to shops lining the square in the predominantly Shiite eastern side of Baghdad.

Also on Monday, Abdul-Sahib Salman Qutub, one of three senior undersecretaries in the Oil Ministry, suffered minor injuries when a bomb went off at his house as he left for work, ministry spokesman Assem Jihad said. He said Qutub's driver was seriously injured.

Another bomb exploded around noon near a police patrol in west Baghdad, injuring one policeman and a civilian, police said.

And just because Dick Cheney instituted the "Salvadoran" option when we invaded Iraq doesn't mean that the ""DICK," Cheney, has turned his blood thirsty goon Zionist Goon Squads loose on an unsuspecting Iraq to convince the Iraqi's they'll need a massive American presence for years to come.

It’s called the Salvador option, named after the brutal repression that the U.S. government oversaw in that country in the 1980s, when the CIA financed, trained, and armed death squads that killed and tortured tens of thousands of people.

This should not come as a total surprise, as Cheney and Rumsfeld in the last several months have both held up El Salvador in the 1980s as a model for Iraq today. But it is astonishing to see government officials speaking openly about the desirability of death squads. (Also noteworthy is the confession, in the Newsweek story, that supporting death squads was part of a “still-secret strategy in the Reagan Administration’s battle against the leftist guerilla insurgency.”)

According to Newsweek, “one Pentagon proposal would send Special Forces teams to advise, support, and possibly train Iraqi squads . . . to target Sunni insurgents and their sympathizers, even across the border into Syria.” By going into Syria, the Pentagon would be regionalizing this war—shades of the Cambodia raids during the Vietnam War.

One military source involved in the Pentagon debate told Newsweek: “The Sunni population is paying no price for the support it is giving to the terrorists. From their point of view, it is cost-free. We have to change that equation.”

Who is behind this carnage?

Definitely not the Iraqi people, they've seen enough death and destruction, courtesy of the USA since 1991. They've seen relatives, friends, neighbors and spouses disappear in a cloud of high explosives dust for years and are sick of this never ending nightmare.

Could it be the CIA created, funded and managed aL Qaida?

No, these bombs are being set off by the same devious monsters behind 9/11 and we all know who that was.

The same monsters that have turned Iraq into a free for all killing zone, with the leaders and potential leaders being targeted by these Death Squads.

Right out of the Bolshevik playbook: Take out the intelligentsia, natural born leaders, religious leaders and pay special deadly attention to the media, who've had a Star of David target on their backs since we invaded Iraq in March 2003.

Keep the water and sewage plants out of service, ensuring many a death due to lack of potable water and epidemics like cholera breaking out.

Keep detonating these "suicide" bombs close to Iraqi civilians in market places, schools and local Iraqi governing councils, all in a design to make the Iraqi's feel and look helpless so they'll just have to have that psychotic "Big Brother," America, stationed in country for decades to come.

The same psychos who are now warning of another "9/11," only this one will be deadlier and more destructive. LIke a suitcase nuked detonated in a medium-size MidWest city to get Americans in the right frame of mind for the Iran War.

That's the ones behind this Iraq butchery, the ones that set off 9/11 and are planning an encore...... soon.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Halloween might be over, but there's still one in costume, running around scaring the hell out of voters, a MARGE TARTAGLIONE (D), Chairwoman, Philadelphia Voting Commission, who's featured in the video.

If you ever wondered what arrogance and condescension looked like in the flesh, Marge will show you an excellent example.

It involves shunting the data that comes from the website for the Secretary of State—I mean, the election returns—taking those election returns as they come to the website in real-time and shunting them to a computer somewhere else. What happened in 2004 was the election returns from Ken Blackwell’s website were shunted to a computer in a basement in Chattanooga, Tennessee, under the control of a very partisan private company to which Connell was connected. The data was shunted to this strange computer in Chattanooga and then directed back to the Secretary of State’s website. As Connell—I mean, sorry, as Spoonamore has said, the only purpose of doing this Man in the Middle thing is to commit crime.

Mark Crispin Miller is a professor of media culture and communication at New York University. He is the author of several books, most recently Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000–2008. His previous book, Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 Election & Why They’ll Steal the Next One Too.

Welcome to Democracy Now!

MARK CRISPIN MILLER: Thanks for having me back, Amy.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, let’s start where I haven’t seen much mention, and that is this man, Mike Connell, in Ohio, testifying. Who is he? What is his relevance to the big day, to Election Day tomorrow?

MARK CRISPIN MILLER: Yeah, this event in a courtroom in Columbus may be one of the most important things to happen in this whole election and may be one of the most important things to happen in American history. I mean, this sounds hyperbolic, I know, but it is true.

Mike Connell is—has been named as Karl Rove’s computer guru since 2000. The lawyers in the case refer to Connell as a high-IQ Forrest Gump, because he’s been on the scene of every dubious election we’ve had over the last eight years, starting with Florida 2000.

Now, he has been named by a man named Stephen Spoonamore, S-P-O-O-N-A-M-O-R-E, who’s a very unusual and particularly unimpeachable kind of whistleblower. He’s a conservative Republican; he’s a former McCain supporter. But above all, he is a renowned and highly successful expert at the detection of computer fraud. He works for big banks. He works for foreign governments, the Secret Service. His job is to figure out how computers are used to steal money or information or votes. Well, he’s named a lot of people in the Bush-Cheney election subversion conspiracy. He has worked with them. He knows them personally. And months ago, he named Mike Connell and his company GovTech Solutions as having played a crucial role in the—basically the electronic subversion of the vote in Ohio in 2004. And Spoonamore has actually described the computer architecture that was used to do this.

Now, on the strength of this testimony, the lawyers in the case had the judge issue a subpoena to Mike Connell last week. Connell defied the subpoena; he was in contempt. Late last week, the lawyers filed a motion to compel compliance, and to everyone’s surprise and delight, the judge ordered Connell to appear today and to be deposed for two hours about his role in this longstanding electronic plot, basically, to flip votes towards the Republicans.

Some of this deposition will be sealed, and I have to tell you the part that’ll be sealed. Apparently, Rove has threatened Connell. He told him that if Connell did not take the fall for this whole thing, the Department of Justice would start investigating Connell’s wife Heather for improper lobbying practices. Now, that part of the deposition we’re not going to know the answers to. But what’s astonishing to me—

AMY GOODMAN: Who does she lobby for?

MARK CRISPIN MILLER: Various politicians and so on. Whether she’s guilty or innocent is beside the point, because, as we know, the Department of Justice is a cudgel in the collective hands of the Bush administration. This would be more selective prosecution.

But what’s really astonishing here is that Karl Rove could make that threat with such impunity. This shut Connell up, and he was, you know, earlier inclined to talk about what was going on. Then he got himself three very expensive Republican attorneys who promised that they would make sure he could not be deposed before Election Day. Well, hallelujah, he’s being deposed before Election Day. And the reason why—

AMY GOODMAN: Today.

MARK CRISPIN MILLER: Today. The reason why this is so important and the strategy behind the early part of this case all along has been that if we can shine a spotlight on the perpetrators of this kind of fraud before Election Day, make them nervous, make them pull in their horns, distract them, there’s a good chance that they might not try to do what they’re clearly ready to do, because, let me just add, Connell is on the McCain payroll. He’s working for McCain right now, and he specializes in a particular kind of computer architecture whose only purpose, Spoonamore says, is to steal votes.

AMY GOODMAN: I want to go back to two issues. One, how do you know Karl Rove made these threats? That’s a very strong allegation.

MARK CRISPIN MILLER: Well, it is a very strong allegation that comes from the lawyers that the lawyers were evidently told by Connell or someone close to him. But this stuff has been on the website of Velvet Revolution. Raw Story has reported it. The media, however, has remained over-focused, of course, on ACORN, which is a nothing story. But let me make clear that the brouhaha over ACORN, right, this orchestrated propaganda drive about ACORN, has many distracting purposes, and one of them, I promise you, is to distract us from this case. This case is an Ohio RICO case. Well, lately, the Republicans filed an Ohio RICO case against ACORN. And I think the purpose—

AMY GOODMAN: RICO, meaning racketeering?

MARK CRISPIN MILLER: It’s a racketeering case. Ohio has the strongest racketeering statute in the country. This is one of the reasons why the lawyers decided to go there and do this.

AMY GOODMAN: What do you mean he specializes in the computer architecture, the internet architecture, that can steal elections?

MARK CRISPIN MILLER: Well, it’s a system—if people go to the website for Velvet Revolution, particularly www.rovecybergate.com, they’ll find the documents that Spoonamore has filed describing the setup that’s known as “Man in the Middle.” This happened in Ohio in 2004.

It involves shunting the data that comes from the website for the Secretary of State—I mean, the election returns—taking those election returns as they come to the website in real-time and shunting them to a computer somewhere else. What happened in 2004 was the election returns from Ken Blackwell’s website were shunted to a computer in a basement in Chattanooga, Tennessee, under the control of a very partisan private company to which Connell was connected. The data was shunted to this strange computer in Chattanooga and then directed back to the Secretary of State’s website. As Connell—I mean, sorry, as Spoonamore has said, the only purpose of doing this Man in the Middle thing is to commit crime.

Bev Harris of Black Box Voting has lately reported that there are similar Man in the Middle setups in Colorado, Illinois and Kentucky. So it’s very important that tomorrow, when we’re out there engaging in election protection and working to make the turnout as large as it possibly can be, because the larger the turnout, the harder the theft, people have to be paying very close attention to the numbers. They have to be watching the traffic at different precincts, and so on.

AMY GOODMAN: I want to go to the issue of voting all over the country. What have—you’re following it very closely. You’re going to be with us Tuesday night for our five-hour broadcast, to be monitoring what’s happening in all the states, especially the key swing battleground states. What have you learned? It’s estimated about a quarter of people have already voted.

MARK CRISPIN MILLER: Yes, an astonishing number of people have voted. And I take that as very good news, not because that necessarily ensures their votes will be safe; I take it as good news because it indicates to me that an awful lot of Americans understand that the voting apparatus that we have out there is untrustworthy, and they’re taking, you know, special steps to see to it that their votes count.

But what we’ve seen over the last couple of weeks is basically a replay, on steroids, if you will, of what we saw in 2004—vote flipping by machines in West Virginia, Texas, Tennessee and Missouri, that we know of. And let me make something clear, Amy. All the flips go in one direction. It’s all from Obama either to McCain or to Cynthia McKinney, as it happens.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Thanks to the false-flag of 9/11, Israel has managed to conflate it's terrorist campaign of ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians with our own hunt for those behind 9/11.

How convenient.

Except the ones behind 9/11 aren't 10,000 miles away, skulking in a cave. They're right here in Washington, DC and Tel Aviv.

LETTER AND PARCEL-POST BOMBS

The Jewish terrorists in Palestine under the command of Menahem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir invented a new method of international terrorism which had no precedent in history, namely sending parcel-post bombs and letter bombs to British officials in London. The first parcel bomb was sent on September 3, 1947. Yitzhak Shamir was the mastermind behind this barbaric method. It was addressed to a high official of British Military Intelligence whom the Zionist terrorist organizations suspected of collecting damaging information about them. i he parcel exploded in a post office in Howick Place, Victoria Street, London, seriously injuring two postrnen.(289

On May 3, 1948, a parcel bomb was addressed to Roy Farran in London. Farran was a member of the British Anti- Terrorist Squad in Palestine who returned to England. The parcel was opened by Rex Farran, his 25-year-old younger brother. Many of his organs were blown to pieces, and he died instantly.(29)

It was established that the Stern Gang was responsible for this crime. Yitzhak Shamir was one of the triumvirate leadership of the Stern Gang.

The Stern Gang under the leadership of Yitzhak Shamir intensified its campaign of sending letter bombs to British officials. Between 4 and 6 June, 1947,20 letter bombs were sent. The first shipments of eight letter bombs arrived in London on June 4, 1947. One was addressed to Sir Stafford Cripps, Minister of the Board of Trade, another to Mr. John Strachy, Minister of Food, neither of whom had any connection with the Palestine question. Both letters were intercepted by Scotland Yard and the bombs were defused.(30)

Three more letter bombs were intercepted by Scotland Yard on June 5, 1947. One was addressed to the Foreign Secretary, Ernest Bevin, who was abhorred by the Zionists for his balanced and fair stand on the Palestine question. Letter bombs were also addressed to Anthony Eden, former Foreign Secretary, and Arthur Greenwood, Minister without Portfolio.(31)

The following are examples of the barbaric methods of terrorism committed by the Jewish terrorist organizations from 1939-1945:

(f) Placing bombs in trucks and cars filled with explosives near buildings and exploding them, thereby killing and injuring many innocent people.

(g) Throwing bombs into passing cars and into Arab crowds, killing and injuring many civilians.

(h) Blowing up of Arab houses and hotels, killing hundreds of men, women and children.

In 1948 the Zionist leaders started to execute their premeditated plan to expel the Palestinians from Palestine and to usurp their homes, lands and all their worldly possessions. In implementing this plan they committed the following war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide as set out in Chapters 9 to 14 of this encyclopedia:

1. They committed hundreds of massacres throughout Palestine.

2. They erased 492 Arab small towns and villages and Bedouin localities from the map of Palestine and converted them into Jewish settlements.

3. They usurped Arab houses and apartments in twelve large towns and cities for settling Jews.

4. They committed looting, pillage, plunder and spoliation of the personal and real properties of Palestinians in twelve large towns and cities and 526 small towns and villages.

5. They destroyed, desecrated and usurped Muslim Holy Places in Palestine and violated the religious rights of Muslims.

6. They destroyed and desecrated Christian Holy Places in Palestine and violated the religious rights of Christians.

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Why does a part of me get cynical and wonder how convenient it was that a "Palestinian" shot and killed Robert Kennedy one year later, on the anniversary of the brutal Israeli attack on the Liberty, forever marking that week as the week RFK was assassinated?

Why do I suspect there were much darker forces at work?

On that infamous June 8, 1967 day, Israel bombed, strafed, dropped napalm, used torpedeos against the USS Liberty and machine gunned both the life rafts and the personnel trying to escape the carnage the Israeli's were inflicting on the Liberty during an attack which lasted over 75 minutes. While the American flag was waving over the ship, having to be hoisted several times, since the Israeli gunners took special aim at the flag.

Israel still proclaims the barbaric attack was "accidental." BS. Here's testimony from an Israeli pilot, who was ordered to attack the USS LIberty:

More proof has recently come to light from the Israeli side. A few years after Attack on the Liberty was originally published, Ennes got a call from Evan Toni, an Israeli pilot. Toni told Ennes that he had just read his book and wanted to tell him his story. Toni said that he was the pilot in the first Israeli Mirage fighter to reach the Liberty.He immediately recognized the ship to be a US Navy vessel. He radioed Israeli air command with this information and asked for instructions. Toni said he was ordered to "attack".

He refused and flew back to the air base at Ashdod. When he arrived he was summarily arrested for disobeying orders.

Israel can lie all it wants to about the unprovoked attack on the USS LIberty, but a lie is still a lie, 41 years later.

And Israel is supposed to be our only friend in the ME?

Funny, but I can't help but to think that before Israel came into existence, the U.S. had NO enemies in the ME.

For an excellent article in the Chicago Tribune that shows even MORE proof that Israel knew what it was doing, clickhere

Adding to his usual criticisms of the "corporate candidates" from the two major parties, independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader yesterday introduced a wrinkle, calling on John McCain to come clean about Israel's 1967 attack on the USS Liberty.

"He doesn't like to have his character impugned. I'm challenging his character on this point," Nader said in a news conference at the Statehouse.

McCain was not involved in the incident, which killed 34 American sailors amid the Six-Day War between Israel and several Arab nations. Israel said the attack was a case of mistaken identity, and McCain's father, Adm. John S. McCain Jr., approved an investigation that determined the incident was a tragic mistake.

Nader is among those who think the report was a cover-up. He's dragging McCain into it because the senator wrote a positive note on a 2002 book, The Liberty Incident, that also concluded the attack was an accident.

"He has been asked again and again by these sailors and their families to come clean," Nader said. "Instead, he endorses a propaganda book that says it was accidental. That reflects on his character."

The McCain campaign declined to respond.

John McCain, have you any decency left sir, any at all?

Or has being so close to so much power thoroughly corrupted your soul?

BTW, Johnny Boy, how much is a soul going for these days? Much more than 30 pieces of silver, I hope.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information.
Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.