50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:

16%

State average from 734 schools:

57%

Minority Rate

Here:

33%

State average from 735 schools:

46%

Region: 5

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTALNumber of Students Tested in Reading: 472 (100%)Number of Students Tested in Math: 472 (100%)Writing Performance Number with Scores: 154Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:

93%

State average from 27 schools:

59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 459Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 443

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITENumber of Students Tested in Reading: 333 (100%)Number of Students Tested in Math: 333 (100%)Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: YesReading Proficiency Number with Scores: 326Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERSNumber of Students Tested in Reading: 16Number of Students Tested in Math: 16Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: ASchool-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESNumber of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: ASchool-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:

96%

State average from 735 schools:

74%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:

94%

State average from 734 schools:

76%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:

95%

State average from 734 schools:

88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:

89%

State average from 734 schools:

51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:

74%

State average from 734 schools:

67%

Making Math Gains

Here:

67%

State average from 735 schools:

68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:

81%

State average from 735 schools:

65%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:

75%

State average from 734 schools:

67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:

671

State average from 734 schools:

557

Percent Tested

Here:

100%

State average from 734 schools:

100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

WYNDHAM LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12%

State average from 734 schools:

53%

Minority Rate

Here:

29%

State average from 734 schools:

45%

Region: 5

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTALNumber of Students Tested in Reading: 455 (100%)Number of Students Tested in Math: 455 (100%)Writing Performance Number with Scores: 160Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:

92%

State average from 27 schools:

59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 447Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 425

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITENumber of Students Tested in Reading: 332 (100%)Number of Students Tested in Math: 332 (100%)Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:

93%

State average from 27 schools:

59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 331Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITENumber of Students Tested in Reading: 345 (100%)Number of Students Tested in Math: 344 (100%)Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: YesReading Proficiency Number with Scores: 342Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 333

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESNumber of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (95%)Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (95%)Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: CSchool-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO