Sunday, May 17, 2015

PBROTRIB SUGGESTION TO GIFT £1.5m TAKEN UP BY THOMAS COOK CEO Peter Fankhauser. Family: ‘Our compensation was accepted before the inquest in which [Peterborough based] Thomas Cook were found to have breached their duty of care...'

The children’s parents have only received a fraction of the £3.5million compensation they had been expecting (Picture: PA)

Latest: Thomas Cook has today [Monday] taken up the PBROTRIB suggestion issued yesterday to gift £1,500,000 (what has been termed 'blood money') to the UN childrens charity Unicef.

This is how BBC NEWS reported the development earlier today:Thomas Cook said its insurers had taken half of the payout for legal costs. It said donating the remainder to Unicef was "the right thing to do".

Group chief executive officer Peter Fankhauser said: "Thomas Cook has not in any way profited from our claim against the hotel owner. "In late 2012, we brought a claim against the hotelier for breaching their contract to provide safe accommodation to our customers and to comply with all applicable laws, which was decided in our favour."Today I have made arrangements for the full amount - £1.5m - to be donated in full to Unicef, the world's leading children's organisation."I believe this is the right thing to do and I apologise to the family for all they have gone through."

This is what the family said earlier yesterday, Sunday:

‘Our compensation was accepted before the inquest in which [Peterborough based] Thomas Cook were found to have breached their duty of care.

‘We accepted the offer from the Louis Group Hotel chain because we were in financial ruin with the enormous cost of attending court hearings in Corfu and the subsequent impact on our businesses which have since ceased trading.’

Julian Bray writes: This is nothing less than a major international PR disaster for the Peterborough based travel firm Thomas Cook.

Where is the Chief Executive Peter Fankhauser (not a British national)? Why is CEO Fankhauser not immediately hosting a an all media news conference to reassure future Thomas Cook holidaymakers, they will not be put at risk?

Where is the statement that properly explains the basis of the legal award (clearly not 'compensation' as the unnamed Thomas Cook seemingly poorly briefed spokesperson stated) and that it was for legal costs incurred?

Who made the claim was it Thomas Cooks insurance company and if so why are they not named?

Where is the offer to additionally compensate the family ( this matter has dragged on for a full 10 years ) for all their subsequent travel and other expenses.

Its reported the family earlier accepted £350,000:00 or 10 percent of the Thomas Cook payout. They claim they were in danger of being declared bankrupt and were forced to accept the payment.

Where is the full legal apology and a detailed account of the lessons learned from this tragic event?

The newspapers have branded it 'blood money' perhaps half of the £3.5million should be paid over to the family and the other half to a charity of the parents choice?

She said her frustration is not about money, but the family is ‘incensed’ that the travel firm sought to claim back costs after a 2010 criminal trial in Greece during which three employees from the Louis Corcyra Beach hotel were found guilty of manslaughter.

Asked about the compensation the firm received, a spokesman for Thomas Cook said: ‘After it was clear that the hotel was responsible for the tragedy all parties affected were compensated and Thomas Cook received a compensation that partly compensated for the costs related to the incident.’

He said the compensation covered ‘some of the costs incurred up to and during the trial in Corfu in 2010′.

On Wednesday a jury at an inquest almost 10 years after the deaths of the children from Horbury, near Wakefield gave a conclusion of unlawful killing, and said Thomas Cook had ‘breached their duty of care’.

The foreman also read out a series of conclusions which included how Thomas Cook had been misled by the hotel about its gas supply, but also how the holiday giant’s health and safety audit of the complex was inadequate.

Speaking after the inquest Mrs Wood said she would always hold the travel firm responsible for the deaths, saying they ‘could and should have identified that lethal boiler.’

The children’s father Neil Shepherd claimed the firm had ‘hidden behind a wall of silence and they have refused to answer any questions for almost nine years.’

Responding to criticism from the family over an apparent failure to apologise over the deaths the spokesman said a letter saying ‘sorry’ had been sent from Thomas Cook chief executive Peter Fankhauser.

Mrs Wood told the Mail on Sunday the firm should have apologised at the inquest.

The coroner said he would deliver recommendations later this year to relevant organisations which he hoped would influence British and European law and practices in the holiday industry.

P'BORO TRIB. SEARCH ENGINE

LONDON EVENING STANDARD NEWSREEL

JULIAN BRAY AVIATION SECURITY NEWS 01733 345581 UK ISDN 01733 345020

UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.

Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens.

We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independently resourced Neighbourhood Watch Scheme. A scheme operated following written guidelines to us directly from the Home Office.

We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.

OUR HUMAN RIGHT TO LAMPOON AND CRITICISE POLITICIANS

THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled. We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. lampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object]publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.

Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).

NUJ CODE OF CONDUCT

NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.

Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)

PBROTRIB CHARTER

Rights Holder CharterVersion: January 2009 v.3IntroductionThis Rights Holder Charter (“Charter”) sets out the terms and conditions governing the relationship between Julian Bray, Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch blog entitled Peterborough Tribune (PBROTRIB) on the Blogger and other platforms, and an individual or company making a Contribution to PBROTRIB (“Rights Holder”). The purpose of this document is to ensure that the Charter terms areincorporated into to all Contracts with each Rights Holder, so both parties areclear as to how PBROTRIB may use content. This Charter does not apply to content submitted:· using a feature or interactive service that allowsthe individual to upload to and display content on any of PBROTRIB websites(including social sites), apps, WAP sites or any web address owned or operatedby PBROTRIB as may link to the terms accessible at(User-Generated Content (“UGC”)); or· This Charter applies to all Rights Holder Contributions, except where the Rights Holder is already subject to a separatewritten agreement with PBROTRIB in relation to Contributions, or where PBROTRIBhas agreed in writing to vary or amend the Charter due to exceptional circumstances. Formation of the Contract

We will not be able to provide Credits where aRights Holder has not provided the relevant information.

Material You Send Us

Material You Send Us is a Contribution that isreceived by PBROTRIB from a Rights Holder. The Contribution may be solicited or unsolicited. The following are examples of Material You Send Us: PBROTRIB has seen the Rights Holders’ photograph on a third party website. PBROTRIB contacts theRights Holder and asks to use the photograph. (Solicited). A Rights Holder speculatively submits a range of photographs to and for PBROTRIB’s use. The Editor may or may not decide to use one or more of the photographs. (Unsolicited) Material You Send Us does not include UGC, Material We Request You To Send Us or material that is governed under anyother relationship between the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to accept any Material You Send Us for review and if accepted for review is under no obligation to offer a Contract. Should PBROTRIB decide that it wishes to use the Contribution, it will be governed by the terms of this Charter. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to use the Contribution. If you wish to submit a speculative Contribution to us, pleasecontact the appropriate PBROTRIB title. Please note that PBROTRIB will not be able to acknowledge receipt of your Contribution and any submission is at the Rights Holder’s own risk.Material You Send Us – Licence TermsPBROTRIB believes that Material You Send Us is theRights Holder’s property and that the Rights Holder should not need to give up all its rights for the Contribution to be used by PBROTRIB. Therefore, bysending us a Contribution, the Rights Holder grants the following irrevocable licence in perpetuity to PBROTRIB: The right to publish, reproduce, licence and sell the Contribution as part of the Publication throughout the world in the following formats:-- the physical printed Publication;-- in a replica layout in any electronic format ofthe Publication;-- on the website version of the Publication;-- in any PBROTRIB apps delivering the Publicationto a reader; and-- on any PBROTRIB social media pages.-- The right to publish extracts or the whole ofthe Publication (which may or may not include the Contribution) when promoting PBROTRIB’s business or subscriptions in media advertisement, show cards and other promotional aids. The Right to authorise The Newspaper Licensing Agency and similar reprographic rights organisations in other jurisdictions (“RROs”) to distribute or license the distribution of your Contribution throughout the world in any language(s) for RROs’ licensed acts and purposes as amended from time to time, and to keep available your Contribution through such RROs. The unlimited right to amend, edit, select, crop, retouch, add to or delete any part of the Contribution, in any format, whether electronic or otherwise, including the right to remove or amend any meta data associated with the Contribution.

POLICE NON EMERGENCY NUMBER

Peterborough Telegraph - News Feed

UPDATE:Following a tip off from Animalsearch. We recovered a cat from Kings Lynn yesterday 21/01/2017 too early to say if it is our missing cat as Vet Anna at Oakdale needs te sedate the poor creature who has been living rough, but fed by local householders.Sad to report, the stray is Not our missing cat, but the rescue cat will be rehomed once his feral demeanour can be muted +++++ Update on the feral. He's now had an operation to remove a few teeth and castrated. Still a bit frisky but Dphne of Peterborough Cats Rescue is working with him...Manwhile Wiggle is still missing... A small Grey Persian style rescue cat has gone missing, Small but fast, very trusting, likes to climb, enter cat flaps, climb fences also enters open windows. No collar, takes them off within hours.. He is identity chipped, very affectionate and likes a cuddle. Might have jumped into a car or van so could NOW be anywhere! Has small curley tail. Any information welcome.