From ooo-dev-return-18111-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue May 8 01:44:33 2012
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEA7A979E
for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 01:44:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 20710 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2012 01:44:33 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 20462 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2012 01:44:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Post:
List-Id:
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 20256 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2012 01:44:27 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 May 2012 01:44:27 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0
tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevingrignon.oo@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 May 2012 01:44:19 +0000
Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so6195826pbb.6
for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 18:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
:content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to;
bh=i/j5T26wu1IycSQFa1xHAtKWQyABza79ciEIGsUtV/g=;
b=mUhy/FsTew34+m6XvH3DfSsDKPl5Ak750OaFJmkkr8fHgpi07qZ/Z0QArmxUikIM2E
3XTbN463Z/2xcScsU6QuR/oZsUj1VmsKT17IwrDLOQsySLhWYW0haZhSxQDNUm5v87kd
AX97F+BiKu35p85FRSPht3L5MiVED39n3TwLJ5Rpuok1UUPfWm1cJsgbTQ+szKBsy2ii
aubRDVco8XRWm505+tNkQHHMRrvAEp2JjlNtewpdGxmPapj56C/H/486Xhxb7fYcQHv9
++7R7faUZg1kJj59eDKAAZkDOj6TUM0+n8B4xZekc/gsZdUj/4RegNtdtq9zNroenp4O
Qeug==
Received: by 10.68.200.68 with SMTP id jq4mr402509pbc.42.1336441439317;
Mon, 07 May 2012 18:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.31.157.170] ([112.64.189.104])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u5sm562203pbu.76.2012.05.07.18.43.56
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Mon, 07 May 2012 18:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
References: <4F9D4D2B.2010000@wtnet.de> <4F9D6595.4070007@gmail.com> <4FA84827.8050206@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Message-Id: <4D19CE7F-ED29-4300-A0BD-925CF23FD38D@gmail.com>
Cc: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org"
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B176)
From: Kevin Grignon
Subject: Re: After AOO 3.4?
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 09:40:09 +0800
To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
Understanding who does what with our product is very important to defining a=
product direction that resonates with our users.=20
The user experience team is about to refresh the UX work products on the wik=
i. An updated set of user roles/personas is our first step. Existing data ca=
n get us started, then we need to incorporate recent behavior shifts, includ=
ing integrated social and mobile.=20
Albino, Louis, Ricardo, would you like to contribute to these user definitio=
ns.=20
Regards,
Kevin
On May 8, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Louis Su=C3=A1rez-Potts wrote=
:
> Hi
>=20
> On Monday, 7 May 2012, RGB ES wrote:
>=20
>> 2012/5/8 Louis Su=C3=A1rez-Potts >:
>>> Hi,
>>>=20
>>> RGB ES wrote:
>>>> 2012/5/5 Albino Biasutti Neto >:
>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> We have to focus on end users, and seek feedback to research, created
>>>>> polls, and others.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> We need to get statistics AOO.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Albino
>>>>=20
>>>> Before that, we need to define who our end users are. We need a set of
>>>> "ideal users" with clear needs: students who do their homework,
>>>> independent writers that use on-line publishing systems, small
>>>> companies that need to create an invoice or maintain a database of
>>>> supplies...
>>>=20
>>> I'm curious... are you dismissing the vast numbers who were using OOo?
>> Briefly, more than 95 percent of downloads from the mirrors were Windows
>> users. But major deployments were almost entirely in the public sector.
>> Some of the more obvious were listed here [0], but the page is out of dat=
e.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>> All those groups have different needs, and the right answer for one
>>>> group could be a problem for the others.
>>>=20
>>> I think that, as was suggested, an effective modus operandi is to work
>> with the NL groups. For instance, there might be public sector or private=
>> needs for accessibility features. We here may not have the people to do
>> that but we (an extended we at this point) can work with those wanting it=
>> to find the developers....
>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> louis
>>>=20
>>> [0]
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Major_OpenOffice.org_Deployments=
>>>>=20
>>>> Regards
>>>> Ricardo
>>=20
>> Sorry, but I cannot understand your question. I'm not dismissing
>> anything. I just commented that a home user is not the same than a
>> professional writer, and that both groups have different needs that
>> ask for different solutions. Building usage statistics without
>> considering the differences between users can lead to wrong
>> conclusions: that's all.
>>=20
>> Maybe is for my professional background, but as physicists I know that
>> before doing research (and analysing user statistics is research) you
>> need a "model" of what you are looking for: on this case, a set of
>> "ideal users" with a lists of needs and problems. Only then you will
>> be able to find solutions.
>>=20
>> Regards
>> Ricardo
>>=20
> Well, as a historian I quite agree with you. My point was that we already
> have a lot of data, as that URL hints.
> Louis
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Sent from Gmail Mobile