He argues that being married is the best way to bring up children, implying
that unmarried parents are inferior. Certainly being gay does not make you
a better parent, as he argues. Hence, I do not support his motion. And..he
can’t have children, only adopt. I would not support such an arrogant
fellow to have children. And..what does ,black have to do with anything in
this debate?

I totally agree that all couples should be able to have children no matter
the sexuality. However, I think it is futile to point out that heterosexual
couples are less likely to be good parents that homosexual parents. I
thought the point is that ability to be a parent is not dependant upon
sexuality?

Making the assumption that you’re straight. Did you choose to like blonds
instead of brunettes? Or chubby girls instead of thin girls? Does this
imply you were born with these preferences? The “being born that way”
argument is in fact weak because if pedos were proven to be born like that.
We would never find them socially acceptable. The strongest argument for
gay relationships is that it is a loving relationship between consenting
adults that share the morals of society as a whole.

I don’t think the gender of the parents affects anything that much, I
believe a same-sex couple has to go through a lot more struggle to get a
child (via adopting or surrogacy) so they may be more determined parents
who definitely wanted the child if you catch my drift.

Two possibilities, although the speech is garbled and not clearly
understood even for fluent speakers. One would be a moderator gets up to
advise of time constraints; but number two that what he said about gay
parents being better parents than straight parents caused one of the
parents in the audience, namely his boyfriend´s father or his own, to get
up and object with levity.

Anthony’s uncomfortable nature during this speech was almost laughable, I
find it fascinating how close minded people can be (Not in a bad way, I’m
just curious to how it becomes so hard to convince some that: love is love,
people are people and equal rights should be for everyone. Not just people
who are ‘deemed fit’)

+Lu Honeychurch The opposition wanted to provide their points of
information or sometimes known as POI that helps reaffirm their stand in
the debate. POIs are short interjections and are allowed in debates if it
happens to coincide with something the speaker says at that moment.﻿