PBS'
Evolution generates a debate

The PBS documentary Evolution has generated a cultural
debate that its producers expected.

Critics of the eight-hour production issued a poll to try to
prove the public disagreed with the program, which was the fall's top
opener Monday on public television.

The Discovery Institute, a public policy organization in Seattle,
commissioned a public poll finding that eight in 10 Americans said a public
television program on evolution should present scientific arguments for it,
"but also the scientific evidence against it."

The Institute has argued that the Evolution series does
not cover scientific criticism of Darwinian theory, which holds that random
mutation and natural selection produced nature's complexity.

"Public television producers are clearly at odds with overwhelming
public sentiment in favor of hearing all scientific sides of the debate,"
said institute President Bruce Chapman.

The series' executive producer, Richard Hutton, who heads
the science unit at WGBH Boston, said yesterday that viewer numbers are not
yet in, but reviews have "been largely wonderful."

"We're getting a lot of questions from viewers,"
he said of the series, which ends tonight. "I hope this series helps people
understand what evolution is."

The series has an interactive Web site that offers, among
other things, advice to educators on dealing with student "misconceptions"
about evolution and on how teachers and administrators can respond effectively
to disputes on the issue.

The Zogby International poll commissioned by the Discovery
Institute found that 71 percent of those surveyed agree that biology teachers
should include "scientific evidence against" Darwin's theory.
The survey of 1,202 adults in late August has a three-point margin of error.

Other organizations are opposing the Evolution series.
The creationist group Answers in Genesis has dedicated its Web site to discussing
the "evolution assault" by PBS. Hugh Ross, an astronomer and founder
of the science ministry group Reasons to Believe, has been on talk-radio shows
this week responding to each episode.

Mr. Chapman believes the producers of the documentary "want
people to think that the only criticism of Darwin's theory today is from
religious fundamentalists," he said. "They routinely try to stigmatize
scientists who question Darwin as 'creationists.'"

The producers of Evolution had asked Discovery Institute
scientists to appear on the last segment, "What About God?" But Mr.
Chapman said they would only cooperate if their scientists could dissent on
camera during the scientific episodes.

The Discovery Institute also circulated a list of 100 scientists
who are "skeptical" of the Darwinian theory of evolution. "Careful
examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged,"
said the statement.

One signer, chemist Henry Schaefer, a five-time Nobel nominee,
said, "Some defenders of Darwinism embrace standards of evidence for evolution
that as scientists they would never accept in other circumstances."

The Evolution series is based on cases of scientists
producing evidence for Darwin's theory. The disagreements among the scientists
are over such questions as when reptiles got fingers, whether a group of genes
dictates animal shapes and whether cooperation can drive evolution.

PBS' Evolution Web site (www.pbs.org/evolution),
which features audio and visual lessons, games and animation, will remain
online after the series ends.

The Discovery Institute's Web site (www.discovery.org)
also has information on the documentary, posting a "viewer's guide"
on the PBS episodes.