Britain has Become a Dangerous Nation

America was right to free itself from British rule in the Revolution of 1775 to 1781. Britain was a corrupt place ruled by a king who barred citizens from having real freedoms. The new America then started down the path to becoming the freest nation on earth.

American military power saved Britain from Hitler’s advance in World War II (1941 to 1945) since we considered Britain to be an advanced Western nation that deserved to live free from tyranny.

Unfortunately today Britain looks more like the Bad Old Place that it was for centuries. Britain has become perhaps the most significant European outpost for radical islam. This comes after left-wing British politicians, allied with islamic pressure groups, have done everything in their power to censor bad news about muslim terrorism and terrorists within Britain, including obstructing deportations of imams (priests) who preach hatred of the West.

London today has a muslim mayor and a skyrocketing crime and terror rate, which is to be expected since modern-day islam is equated with extremism and violence including muslim ‘rape gangs’ that target white British children through a process called “grooming”. Fox News reports:

U.K. right-wing activist and journalist Tommy Robinson was arrested and reportedly jailed Friday after he filmed members of an alleged child grooming gang entering a court for trial — but the details of his purported sentence remain murky after the judge ordered the press not to report on the case.

Robinson, the former head of the English Defense League and a longtime activist against Islam and Islamic migration, was arrested after he was filming men accused of being part of a gang that groomed children. Britain has been rocked by a series of child sex scandals perpetuated by gangs of predominantly Muslim men.

Video shows Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Lennon, being surrounded by as many as seven police officers as he livestreamed the incident on his phone. The police informed him he was being arrested for “breach of the peace.”

This is frightening Soviet-style stuff. And Tommy Robinson is not a “right wing activist”. Robinson is a British citizen seeking to expose migrant muslim terrorism, corruption and crime in his country. That means that he is a sensible and honorable citizen of a nation that he was born in, not that he migrated into.

On the other hand it is radical left-wing elements of the British government, judiciary and media that are seeking to cover up this corruption and crime and who are the real threats to Britain, along with the terrorists.

In a genuinely free nation like the United States criminal trials are covered openly. Names of the accused are broadcast in the US media.

Britain is not a free nation. It rarely has been and today with its influx of muslims it is getting worse and worse. The muslims are importing their system of lawlessness and are teaming up with the British socialists and communists to imprint their system on that nation and turn Britain away from any constitutional freedoms that it may have enjoyed like freedom of speech or freedom of the press.

When president Trump visits Britain this Summer Nikitas3.com is calling for him to publicly criticize the British government over its treatment of Tommy Robinson. Trump should also denounce the onslaught of crime, murder and terrorism in London under its muslim mayor Sadiq Khan, who has associated with and defended islamic terrorists and other extremists. Breitbart News reports about Khan:

In 2001 he was the lawyer for the Nation of Islam in its successful High Court bid to overturn the 15-year-ban on its leader, Louis Farrakhan.

In 2005 and 2006 he visited terror-charged Babar Ahmed in Woodhill Prison. Mr. Ahmed was extradited to the U.S. in 2012, serving time in prison before being returned to the UK in 2015. Mr. Ahmed pleaded guilty to the terrorist offences of conspiracy, and providing material support to the Taliban.

And Mr. Khan also campaigned for the release and repatriation of Shaker Aamer, Britain’s last Guantanamo detainee, who was returned to the UK in November.

Both Messrs Aamer and Ahmed provided Mr. Khan with links to the advocacy group CAGE, which described the Islamic State executioner Mohammed Emwazi as a “beautiful young man”, and which has campaigned on behalf of both men. Mr. Khan is reported to have shred a stage with five Islamic extremists, including at sex-segregated events.

This is scary. Fox News reports about Tommy Robinson:

The judge in the (Robinson) case on Friday slapped a reporting ban on the case. The order bans reporters from reporting on a case if there is reason to believe the reporting could prejudice a trial. The order prevents reporting until the conclusion of the trial Robinson was reporting on.

This would be like an American judge telling reporters that they can’t report on the Harvey Weinstein case. But in America, with freedom of the press and freedom of speech, it is legal to announce that someone has been arrested or indicted for a crime, or even is suspected. Their photo can be printed in the media.

Why? Because we are confident enough in our justice system to believe that a free and fair court will find the truth. Fox News reported:

Sources with knowledge of Robinson’s case spoke on condition of anonymity in part because of fear they would be arrested for contempt. One told Fox that Robinson’s lawyer warned that, considering the presence of Muslim gang members in prison, a 13-month sentence was tantamount to a death sentence.

Yes, you can expect this to possibly happen since the left-wing activists who control much of the British legal system and media want to destroy or kill anyone who reports on muslim terrorism and crime, like Tommy Robinson.

Much of Britain is ruled by an essentially pro-terrorist government and media just like tens of millions in the Democrat party and media in America are pro-terrorist who claim that anyone who questions islam is a bigot or a racist. They also blame America for islamic terrorism and for 9/11.

Britain has even allowed muslim jihadists who have gone to fight in the Middle East to return to Britain. Here is The Daily Mail reporting in 2017 after president Trump smashed the terrorists throughout Iraq and Syria:

Around 350 ISIS fighters have returned to the UK from Syria, creating a nightmare for security services, it emerged today.

MI5 has previously said around 850 extremists from Britain travelled to the Middle East as the terror group took control of Syria and parts of Iraq.

But with ISIS now being pushed out, jihadists with British passports are fleeing back to the UK, where authorities fear they may unleash a new wave of attacks.

Gee, Perhaps Britain should apply the same scrutiny to returning jihadists as they are applying to Tommy Robinson. But no, that would be “racist” to the left and British media like the BBC.

By the way, BBC was the employer for decades of the infamous child molester Jimmy Savile. Certainly many people at BBC knew about Savile and so we can expect that BBC would want to cover up for child rape gangs, muslim or otherwise.

Fox News reports:

Reaction to Robinson’s sentencing from commentators and right-wing politicians was fierce, particularly as it is the latest in a series of commentators — particularly those who are critical of Islam and mass Islamic migration into the U.K. — being locked up by British authorities.

“What kind of police state have we become?” tweeted U.K. Independence Party leader and European MP Gerard Batten.

… Robinson has long been a polarizing figure in the U.K., with supporters saying that he speaks out against political correctness and the growing influence of Islamic extremism, while opponents claim he is a racist who stokes fear and division.

Again, we know this tale. Anyone in the US who speaks out against islamic terrorism is smeared as a racist. Meanwhile here is another way that Britain is covering up for terrorists by comparing two events:

*The accidental Greenfell Tower fire in London of June 14, 2017 killed mostly poor muslim migrants and is still a major story in Britain and has been over the last year.

*The May 2017 islamic terror bombing in the city of Manchester, which was an intentional attack directed at Britain’s young white native-born girls at a pop music concert, has disappeared from the British media and from the American media too.

Here is an analysis from Breitbart News on May 22, 2018:

Today marks the first anniversary of the worst atrocity committed on British soil in living memory: the murder of 22 innocents, most of them young girls, and the wounding or maiming of dozens more by a Muslim suicide bomber at a pop concert in Manchester.

… When Salman Abedi blew himself up at the Manchester Arena, he knew was going to hit Western Civilisation at its most tender and vulnerable spot: that’s why he chose a concert by Ariana Grande rather than, say, another comeback tour by the Rolling Stones or the Grateful Dead.

Those girls – the youngest victim, Saffie Rose Roussos, was aged just eight – died for the crime of being carefree young females in a culture which chooses not to hide its womenfolk behind veils or hack off bits of their genitalia at puberty so that they are less likely to enjoy sexual pleasure when they reach adulthood.

Their massacre, let it be stressed, was not just one of those random events that happens from time to time whose explanation remains an utter mystery. Like 9/11 and 7/7, like the destruction of Palmyra and the Buddhas of Bamiyan, like the killing and near-beheading on the London streets of the soldier Lee Rigby (today is the anniversary of that too), it was a calculated act of war by Islamic fundamentalists who are perfectly open about their plans for the world: they want us all to submit to the will of Allah, following the example of such paradises on earth as Islamic-state controlled-Syria and Taliban-ruled Afghanistan.

So, a pretty big deal then, for Western Civilisation, you might think: a watershed moment in which radical Islam upped the ante to a hideous new pitch of awfulness.

… Compare and contrast the coverage in the UK media afforded the Grenfell Tower disaster (where a London tower block burned down killing many of its occupants) and the Manchester Arena bombing.
Since Grenfell, not one day has gone by without some breastbeating lament for the victims or excoriating diatribe against the people allegedly responsible (invariably ‘heartless Tories’) (conservatives).

Sure the Grenfell stuff is canting and political – whipped up by Jeremy Corbyn’s hard left mob in order to make their opponents, who in fact bear little direct responsibility for the disaster, look uncaring and incompetent – but that hasn’t stopped the media cheerfully regurgitating it (not just the left wing media but conservative imprints too), nor the government from making out like Grenfell was one of the defining tragedies of our era.

… The Manchester Arena, by contrast, was not a freak accident. It was part of a very recognisable pattern. It was deliberate. And if the security services (who, admittedly, have an impossible job trying to keep tabs on every jihadist bent on mischief) had been more thorough it could probably have been avoided.

So why has there been so little discussion of (Manchester)?

Quite simply because Britain’s spineless liberal Establishment – which currently includes the government, local government, the civil authorities and large swathes of the media, most especially the BBC – has decided it would be better if we looked the other way.

This sounds like it ought to be a conspiracy theory. If only it were. But the evidence to the contrary is hard to refute. As Brendan O’Neill argues in an excellent comment piece for the Sun, the “political establishment seems hell-bent on gagging public discussion about ¬Islamist extremism.”

… Things got so bad that in June (2017), a month after the bombing, then Ukip leader Paul Nuttall was booed in a General Election TV debate simply for saying that the problem is “Islamist extremism”. You can’t utter the I-word, it seems.

… As Douglas Murray argued in the Spectator at the time, there are serious problems with such concerted attempts to airbrush terrorist events out of history by recasting them as vital learning lessons on the importance of peace and love:

But what we seem most likely to dodge yet again is the possibility of learning any proper lessons at all from this.

Finally here is more on the Euro-hating globalist left from Reuters about another nation, South Africa, which is controlled by the communist African National Congress:

More than 200 farmers from South Africa have applied for humanitarian visas in Australia after allegedly suffering attacks for being white, according to the Australian Home Affairs Ministry.

“The type of criteria they of course have to meet – or the key one – is evidence of persecution, so that’s exactly what we will be looking at,” Home Affairs Deputy Secretary Malisa Golightly said. Home Affairs said 89 refugee visa applications relating to 213 people had been received, although they did not specify their ethnicity or any other details.

News reports emerged earlier this year revealing that white farmers in South Africa had faced persecution after the country’s government approved a new law allowing for the confiscation of their lands, which would be transferred to black citizens.

Following the reports, Australian Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton announced his willingness to start fast-tracking humanitarian visas for South Africans who had endured violent rural crime at home and wished to move Down Under. The step was slammed by the South African opposition, which called Australia, and those willing to escape there, ‘racist.’

So there you go. This situation is so extreme that anyone who defends white people against being murdered is called a “racist”. Sound familiar? Sound radical? It sure is and we see it every day in America. Reuters continued:

The controversial (confiscation) legislation was endorsed by South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, who pledged to hand the lands owned by white farmers since the 1600s to black citizens of the country without compensation for the owners. South Africa’s 50 million citizens are predominantly black, but 72 percent of farmland reportedly belongs to whites.

The legislation evoked strong disapproval both in the country and internationally, with a reported upsurge in violence against white farmers. Last year, some 82 people were killed in a record 423 farm attacks, and there have been 109 attacks and more than 15 murders in 2018, Afriforum, a South African civil rights group reported in March.

If this kind of stuff happened in the US – for instance if blacks were targeted by whites for confiscation and murder as a direct result of a government policy – then the United Nations would seek to intervene. But since it is targeted at white people by blacks in Africa it is overlooked.

(Please bookmark this website and send this article by e-mail to your friends. Please recommend this site to all of your friends via Facebook and any other means. Let’s make Nikitas3.com the #1 conservative site by word of mouth. And if you would like to contribute to Nikitas3.com, please click the link at the upper right where it says “support this site”. Thank you, Nikitas)