On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:39:46 +0100 (BST)
Dominic Morris <dom at suborbital.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Dominic Evans wrote:
> > On 25 October 2011 14:27, Tony Houghton <h at realh.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:54:36 +0100 (BST)
> >> Dominic Morris <dom at suborbital.org.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Complete tables are here:
> >>>
> >>> http://rst38.org.uk/vdr/freesat_tables_complete.zip> >>
> >> Those are the ones with holes in aren't they? Stuart Morris said
> >> he had to "port" the tables from eepg.
> >
> > No, I believe EEPG took these exact tables from the same source(s)
> > as Dom got them. Its just the freesat.diff hadn't been updated to
> > contain the complete tables 'in-patch'.
>> That's correct. The ones in the patch are those deduced through
> observation, there's an updated version of those here:
>http://rst38.org.uk/vdr/freesat_tables_20081027.zip Those files are
> completely legitimate.
>> The "complete tables" were extracted from an OTA firmware upgrade and
> are complete. They may have dubious legality.
Which are newer, "complete" or "20081027"? I was using "complete" with
the patch before I switched to eepg and I'm pretty sure I did notice
holes very occasionally.