Confessions of a College Professor

Monday, February 19, 2018

It’s no secret many of our institutions of
higher education have a real problem with rabid, vicious, White-Hating Social
Justice Warriors (or SJWs, or Leftists, if you prefer) overrunning campuses
across the county.

For “converged” institutions, that is,
institutions where the takeover is complete, I see no solution beyond
bulldozers. These guys have no tolerance for opposing views, and converged
campuses can only seal themselves off into a bubble of hatred of everything
else, ending in their eventual self-destruction as the hatred turns inward.

Luckily, these guys have overplayed their
hand, and many of them speak out, revealing their institutions as corrupted. A recent article on Inside Higher Ed contains the rant of a SJW. Lest the
reader think I’m being unfair in the characterization, allow me to begin with a
short bio of the author:

Nicole
Truesdell is the senior director of the office of academic diversity and
inclusiveness, and affiliated faculty in critical identity studies at Beloit
College. Her general interests are in radical pedagogy, academic hustling and
social justice.

--when
did “academic hustling” become a hobby or personal interest?

It wasn’t that long ago that no campus in
the country had an “office of academic diversity” filled with commissars making
$150k a year, like this “senior director.” The interested reader should consider the list of office staff for this fiefdom, to get even a
slight idea of how much money is wasted in these places.

Anyway, it wasn’t that long ago that no
institution had diversity fiefdoms. By no coincidence, it wasn’t that long ago
race riots were nonexistent on campus, as well.

The thing is, these Offices of Diversity
wield scary power on campus, as faculty are forced to go to re-education
meetings to have large volumes of ideological dogma crammed down their throats.
Refusing to go participate in the brainwashing can lead to repercussions, as the Duke Divinity crisis highlighted
in detail. Faculty
are terrified of speaking out, as we know the consequences are dire.

So let’s read what this self-admitted
Social Justice Warrior has to say, as it very much highlights what’s going on
in higher education today:

Recent events in Charlottesville, Va.,
and Shelbyville, Tenn., show
us the modern face of American white supremacy. Rather than marching under
sheets or lurking in the backwoods, today’s white supremacists stand proud in
their tan khakis and white polos with tiki torches in hand.

Of the thousands of the participants in Charlottesville, only a few
dozen at most were arguably “white supremacists,” with the
largest group there being Antifa terrorists. Our commissar above doesn’t
care about such data, and instead simply repeats the narrative.

…we can also look to colleges and universities as sites that
help both disseminate and normalize racist hate speech.

Again, the commissar does not care about facts and reason, only pushing
the narrative.

Alt-right/white supremacist speakers and organizations are
choosing to use and abuse colleges and universities as locations at which to
speak and recruit. Speakers like Richard Spencer, Milo Yiannopoulos and Ann
Coulter…

More pushing of the narrative. I assure the gentle reader, re-education
seminars are much like this. Lies, and lies, and lies, are crammed down faculty
throats. I would like to point out that Milo is a homosexual with a black
boyfriend…and yet the narrative here is Milo is a “white supremacist.” I don’t
claim to be an expert, but I’m pretty sure white supremacists are against
homosexuality, and very confident they’re against people of different races
having sex with each other. But the narrative must be pushed no matter how
ridiculous it is.

The author then slathers that label on Coulter and Spencer, but this is
silly stuff.

Ann Coulter was one of the very few to identify Donald Trump as not only
legitimate, but as the winner of the presidential election long before he was
even nominated as a candidate. She did so confidently and repeatedly, never
backing down…I’m completely unaware of any “white supremacist” views she’s
uttered, but with such a demonstrated track record of political insight, it’s
clear what she has to say should be heeded.

(I’ve never heard Richard Spencer speak, and so cannot comment on this
other charge by the commissar, though I have little optimism it is accurate.)

It’s so…infuriating that the commissars engage in this baseless name-calling.
Why do the commissars get to define what “white supremacist” means, and why is
their definition so vague as to include people like Milo who are the very
opposite of any definition of white supremacist a sane person would use?

Why are colleges and universities prime and targeted sites
for white supremacist speakers and their allies?

It’s so tiresome listening to this idiocy. Speakers come to campus
because they are invited. There’s no “targeting here,” certainly not by white
supremacist speakers, assuming any exist who legitimately can even be called
that.

Rather than address systemic and structural oppression and
discrimination, faculty are being asked to take “neutral” stances and just
teach our disciplines…Yet for many scholars, this is our work.

Uh, no? This is one of the many things that makes ideologues so
tiresome: belief that ideology is everything. A few years ago, our leaders in
higher ed could only grunt how “leadership” was the purpose of higher ed, but
on campuses where commissars have taken over, higher education is now about
ideology.

Honest, higher education is supposed to be about education, either of people
or humanity. To assert higher education is all about looking for oppression, looking
for ways to be offended, is even more inaccurate than thinking higher education
is about leadership.

. I have been trained specifically to see and call out
institutional racism through an intersectional lens.

I bet not one reader in 10,000 knows what the author is talking about
here. You’re missing nothing, I promise you, it’s just irrelevant navel-gazing,
the training mentioned can be mastered and emulated quickly: just call anything
you don’t like “RACIST.” Simply practice shouting that word until you can
reliably spew spittle with every utterance, and you too can become a commissar.

It is on college and university campuses, and within our
classrooms and through our programming, where resistance to this encroaching
normalized white supremacist ideology must be challenged.

Wait…what? Again. “Normalized white supremacist ideology”? Imagine
listening to this stuff for hours on end, to get some idea of what a
re-education seminar for faculty is like. We’ve established the SJWs honestly
believe everything is RACIST
now…there’s no point in trying to please them by trying to remove whatever they
consider racist, as this wouldn’t leave a square foot of ground to stand on.

I’ve only touched on the highlights of the rant, above. As is so often
the case, scholars roast this idiocy in the comments section. They do so anonymously,
of course, since if any scholar openly challenged the above narrative, well, it’s
off to the re-education seminar again.

One comment points out the ultimate issue here:

I've
read this article and the links provided, yet nowhere here or in those links is
"white supremacy" clearly defined. As far as I can tell, what this
author and those she links to call "white supremacy" is in reality
simple white culture.

With no
definition, “white supremacy” does indeed mean whatever the SJW wants it to
mean, and any look at their words and behavior make it clear: the SJW hates
white people, hates white culture, and anything associated with either is
“white supremacy.”

It’s good that
they’ve revealed their ultimate goal of killing everything white. But now that
we know what they want, will anything be done about it?

But, sure, if you want to believe I'm wrong, and admin somehow accidentally typed up and posted such a want ad, well, you can believe what you want to believe. Thing is, I knew this type of ad would get posted again; these people live in such a bubble they don't have a clue what they do is wrong. Racist/sexist hiring policies have been so standardized that they really are starting to forget that it's supposed to be done with a wink and a nod...and not in writing. These policies are not restricted to the US, as even Canada, apparently, also believes the ethnicity of the applicant is important for scholarly positions. Consider this from a want ad for a vice provost (a position that could pay a few hundred thousand a year):

In keeping with the principles of employment equity and with an aim to address underrepresentation at Dalhousie, only applications from candidates who self-identify as racially visible and/or as Aboriginal peoples will be considered at this time. Now, I don't know what, exactly, "racially visible" means but it's reasonable to suspect this is another (wink, wink) situation put into writing. Isn't it fascinating that "principles of employment equity" are being used to justify this inequitable hiring?

I grant that there can be some positions where skin color/gender/ethnicity might be relevant (for example, I have no problem with Hooters only hiring female waitresses that can wear the uniform), but nothing in the extensive job description makes skin color relevant. Besides, this position is so far up in the hierarchy that she would never actually deal with a student (this position, if I worked at this university, would be my boss' boss' boss' boss' boss...perhaps only 3 more layers of bureaucracy until the Poo Bah is reached!)...it's nuts. Yes, I used the pronoun "she" in the previous paragraph, even though it's clear the job description doesn't specify female.Nominations and/or applications should be submitted, in confidence, to Jane Griffith or Dania Zargaran...

Perhaps it's just a paranoid delusion on my part, so I won't go there but...we really, really, need to start asking hard questions about what's going on in our institutions of higher education, because it's very clear that they're being taken over by racists. (I know I'm posting a bit early here, but I wanted to get this up before they take down that racist job advertisement.)www.professorconfess.blogspot.com

Now, I’m citing
Fox News above, a widely reviled news source. As per Wikileaks, it is one of
the very few large audience news outlets that shouldn’t be viewed as completely
fraudulent. I concede they’re not very good but they do look good on the curve,
at least. They manage to screw up the news here right away:

Before coming to teach in Brooklyn College's
mathematics education program…

She’s a teacher of math
education. Her Ph.D. is also in Math Education. She publishes in Math
Education. It really, really, drives me nuts that we have these people, these
Educationists, posing as scholars in different fields. I’ve written extensively
of the fraud, and it simply drives me nuts that time and again these people
continue to represent themselves as something they are, most definitely, not.
It’s infuriating.

Ok, just because
she’s been misrepresented here, it may not be her fault (it’s Fox News, after all), and even though her Ph.D.
isn’t in mathematics, I’m still quite willing to hear what she has to say about
mathematics. Of course, she’s not talking about mathematics, she’s talking
about identity politics.

Rubel reportedly recommended that math teachers
use more social justice issues during lessons. Rubel, however, warned that
teaching “social justice” can also be a tool of whiteness if teachers are
ignorant to the experiences of their minority students...

I should point out that this professor has
won some pretty hefty awards for believing in these things. I tend to disagree
with such beliefs, of course, and I want to point out a big difference between
disagreement here as opposed to disagreement in an academic field. It’s always
puzzling when I hear Educationists make these kinds of statements to explain
why “minorities” don’t do well in math class, as though Whiteness is the
problem. China has plenty of people who are not white, and yet do fine in
mathematics, after all.

Anyway, the difference between academics
and Education is I can actually formulate an argument explaining why the
professor is wrong, whereas the Educationist simply just says stuff without
justification. Let’s take an example:

Rubel wrote that math teachers who claim to be
color-blind are not doing the minority students any favors.

I’m pretty color blind about “2 + 2 = 4”
and other basic mathematical ideas because none of the mathematics makes an
assumption about the color of the skin of the person making the calculation.
The burden is on her to show me in the definitions where such assumptions
exist, because I know no skin-color-related definitions are in mathematics.

As far as “doing the minority students
any favors” goes, I maintain that mathematics is not under any obligation to do
any students, minority or otherwise, any favors under any circumstances. I
again put the burden on her to show where mathematics makes any such claim.

Now, I grant a Fox News article isn’t
going to show her full arguments, just her (odd) conclusions but as luck would
have it, her whole research paper is online.

This research is published in the Journal
of Urban Mathematics. I’m still scratching my head over the title of this
journal; I know I don’t know all mathematics, but can’t hazard a guess what “urban”
mathematics could be. To the best of my understanding, mathematics is the same
whether you’re in a rural or urban or cosmopolitan setting…even in outer space,
mathematics doesn’t change.

One of my many issues with Education as a
field is how they’ve isolated themselves from academia. Their students don’t
take math courses taught by mathematicians, instead Education students take
Math for Education courses, taught by Education professors. Similarly, they
take Art for Education majors, Chemistry for Education majors, and so on. It’s
bizarre that what are general academic topics for the rest of humanity are
“specialized” for Educationists. Perhaps this weird education is why these
people never consider China in their thinking, since they’re unaware it even
exists?

Oh no, “teaching mathematics for social
justice”? If there was even remote doubt that we’re dealing with a Social
Justice Warrior here, it’s gone in the first sentence.

I
foreground “race” in this literature review because of the significance of
whiteness in the United States in reproducing subordination and widening
society’s opportunity gaps in and through mathematics education…

While the professor does cite her sources
for the above, I’m still puzzled at why the research always forgets about
Asians; many Asian groups have come to this country and done quite well. Again,
this mountain of empirical evidence destroys the “it’s white people’s fault”
narrative, and so is simply ignored. (But if anyone knows an argument or
research explaining it, feel free to comment below.)

More
generally, whiteness tacitly positions White people, their experiences, and
their behaviors as superior…

There are many statements like the above,
and while it is cited, it’s not at all clear what any of this has to do with
mathematics, or student success. In any event, there is extensive discussion
and review of literature before getting to the research, which is statistics
based. I note her sample size is 12 (or “N = 12,” as they say in statistics).

Hey, anyone else remember that “horrible”
Wakefield study relating vaccines and autism? It was considered complete
garbage because of the small sample size. Guess what it was? That’s right, 12.
Such a small sample doesn’t actually destroy a study, it just means it should
be viewed as preliminary. But I digress.

In any event, the vast results of the
statistics here are based on qualitative interpretations of what’s going on in
the classroom. There are, of course, no controls, either.As such, there’s no way to put any stock in
any of the results. You can pretty much get any result you want from this kind
of study, which is little more than a collection of case studies; I’m more than
a little puzzled at the long preamble at the beginning of this research. I
honestly thought something was going to be shown here, but…no dice.

Whiteness
as blinding. Mary and Molly avoided addressing issues of power and social
justice in the content of their mathematics lessons, even though…

Even in the case studies, there’s a theme
here that is unpleasant. Instead of commending teachers for sticking to
mathematics in their mathematics classes, there’s chastisement for not spending
time on social justice. What’s up with that?

Getting back to the point: we as a nation
are pouring huge sums of money into this “research,” and calling it
“mathematical research.” We really need to stop doing that, and seeing as the
main source of that money is the student loan scam, shutting that down would be
a fine place to start.

Monday, February 12, 2018

In earlier essays
I mentioned how once a Social Justice Warrior gets control of hiring, it’s a
lockdown: all further hires are SJWs, or Progressives, or Leftists, or whatever
you want to call them.

Now, as evidence
for my claim I could simply point to the strong Leftist leanings of the
admin/faculty/staff on our campuses: seeing as about half the country (as per
the last election) doesn’t subscribe to this ideology, the best explanation for
90% or more of our campus professionals being adherents is a chokehold on
hiring.

But a specific
example is really worthwhile.

Rumors have been going around ever since her
appointment to the Provost office of her playing favorites when it came to
hiring or promotion of employees under her department. A complete investigation
needs to be done and she and her wife need to be placed on leave without pay
until such time as it is complete.

The article
I’m quoting from is a news article about a Provost caught in a
corruption scandal, and as per the reference to “she and her wife” above, we’re
talking about a married lesbian couple. The news piece does the best it can to
tiptoe what a mess she was caught in, and I assure the gentle reader what was
going on here was far more than what’s presented as news.

Texas
A&M’s outgoing Provost and Executive Vice President Karan Watson has been
removed from her position after an internal audit found significant conflict of
interest issues tied to business dealings her spouse had with the university,

Once again I see
we have a title well past twice as long as the holder’s name, and I remind the
gentle reader of my easy guideline for restoring sanity to our campuses: simply
eliminate all positions whose titles are more than twice as long as the holder’s
name.

Once you get high
up in the admin, you start to have control over the vast loot from the student
loan scam. Now, there are rules about spending this loot, and one of those
rules is “Thou Shalt Not Do Business With Family.” I’ve seen plenty of
institutions violate this rule, which naturally includes one’s spouse. Thing
is, as this was a lesbian marriage, the safeguards against violating the rules
in this manner weren’t really in place, which is why it took years before the
conflict of interest was unearthed.

Over
the last seven years since Karan Watson took over as provost, Nancy Watson —
owner of a conflict resolution company in Bryan-College Station — was paid
$438,733 by the university for training services….

At least, that’s
one explanation for why it took years, although it seems whenever I cover a
scandal, it’s something that had been going on for quite some time. That said,
7 years is a long time to get away with this, even as I acknowledge by the
standards of our Poo Bahs, looting not even half a million bucks is hardly
noticeable.

A “conflict
resolution company”? How is it that this was not obvious fraud on the face of
it. I’m sure this campus has many Psychology professionals in their Psychology
department, could they have not helped? This is a campus, not the Middle East,
how could you possibly justify spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on
conflict resolution training?

…a
whistleblower’s complaint made in May, marking the third grievance accusing the
Watsons of similar possible ethics violations connected to Nancy Watson’s
business…

Another thing
that’s striking about scandals, despite it seeming to occur every time, is how
everyone knew about it. This was the third complaint regarding an obvious
conflict of interest. When I was at a fake community college, we all knew of the frauds going on, though only a handful of us complained...not that anything was ever done, of course.

Much like the
horrific sex scandal at Penn State, the clear academic fraud at UNC, and, well,
every other time I examine a scandal, it’s very clear that people knew
something quite wrong was going on. It’s well documented that people made formal
complaints regarding the obviously foul activity…and nothing happens. Only
after repeated complaints about obvious issues does anything finally get done,
and it takes years.

I grant that our
higher education system is very slow to change, slow to respond, and to some
extent it’s designed to be that way and I’m fine with it. But far too often are
we finding frauds or “whatnot” going on for nearly a decade before something is
finally done about it.

For those who are wondering why
it took so long (after 2 other complaints and many years) to come to this
point, I can tell you that Watson was the consummate bully. You did not cross
her. There are bullies everywhere but what do you do when the #2 person at the
university is a bully. Just put up with it. Watson didn't have to ask folks to
use her spouse’s services - they were afraid not to.

I’m quoting from
the comments section here, because these people are often quite nasty. I
certainly have known fear when dealing with admin, as they wield too much
undeserved power, which they commonly use to pour money on themselves and their
cronies, leading to more power.

Not just a bully. A
bullet-proof bully. Nobody dared expose her for fear of being called an
intolerant homophobe or worse. She knew what she was doing and did not care if
it was a clear conflict. She dared anyone to stop her. Only when she had
decided to retire did anyone say something. Now, she feigns surprise and
concern for her reputation. Give us a break. This scandal must be fully aired
and exposed.

Another comment worth
consideration. Part of the SJW takeover of our campuses is that whenever anyone
complained about the actions of an SJW admin, that person was labeled RACIST
and ostracized. In this case, the label was doubtless more along the lines of
HOMOPHOBE…it’s a tough, tough, battle to fight, and one of many reasons why we
need to escort identity politics off campus (and over a cliff, truth be told).

Even in light of
this scandal, the provost is playing the gay card (how’d that work for Spacey?),
and perhaps she’s right. Bottom line though, every aspect of this story rings
true to me, from the repeated complaints, the clear conflicts of interest, the
bullying, and everything else. It’s all stuff along the lines of what I’ve seen
with my own eyes, elsewhere.

Would be worth looking at several departments
where faculty spouses report to department heads.

The provost maintains she and her
wife did nothing wrong, and I’m certain from her point of view, it’s true. It
might even be true, legally. And, absolutely, I’m sure there are husband/wife
conflicts of interest to be found in quantity on our campuses…but the point I
wanted to make here is that it’s not tough to find evidence of my claims
regarding how these people operate.

This is
the second Glee actor to commit suicide. This particular guy was under
investigation for pedophilia, and was mere days away from providing a list of
names regarding how he got his pictures and stuff. Man, what a lucky break for
those other pedophiles. In following these types of stories, I see these kinds
of lucky breaks where people commit suicide right before testifying against the
bad guys happen often.

It had earlier been
revealed that the man's corpse had been found in a riverbed.

Wait…what? Apparently, after hanging himself, he decided to take a walk,
eventually coming to a riverbed where, realizing he was dead, he stopped. And,
yet, this is a suicide. I’m not a doctor, but my understanding of how death
works is you generally don’t go for walks after you die. But since it’s ruled a
suicide, there won’t be much of a murder investigation.

The site
I’m quoting from doesn’t allow comments, so I can’t get a feel for how other
readers are buying this story, but I do find myself wondering just how many
times the public will get the “we’re calling this a suicide and there’s nothing
you can do it about because we’re the law…IN YOUR FACE!” line before a large
segment of the public outright riots at the insult to their collective intelligence.

I have a different sausage to fry today, if
you’ll forgive the mangled metaphor.

He was arrested in December 2015 and was
found to have downloaded more than 50,000 images and videos of child abuse to
his computer and another 4,000 on his flash drive.

The gentle
reader should understand that this “suicide right before turning state’s
evidence” is very common, so common that it’s very difficult to understand why
these important witnesses to horrific crimes are not provided some measure of
protection…almost as though those who should be providing that protection are
the same as those who keep deciding these are suicides are the same as those
who are involved in the crimes, somehow.

Ok,
that’s a little conspiratorial and it’s considered bad form to do much beyond
worship law enforcement, so let’s just call the consistently strange suicides and
consistent lack of prudent protection coincidental.

So,
enough theorizing, let’s consider a quantitative detail:

…50,000 images…

The above
is the part that I want to address. In many pedo cases, the suspect is found to
have tens of thousands of pedophilic pictures and videos on his computer.

Tens of
thousands. Even the most famous porn stars with long careers only have hundreds of videos, and one would suspect the career of a child in this situation to be very brief.

This
suicide had a typical stash compared to other, similar arrests, and it’s a safe
bet that he didn’t have a complete collection of every single pedo pic/video in
existence.

Maybe it’s
just a wild conspiracy theory about the suicides, but you don’t produce tens of thousands of videos from
some guy with a Polaroid camera molesting his kid in a garage. You don’t distribute tens of thousands of videos
by word of mouth, selling one copy at a time in the alley behind the adult
bookstore.

It’s
very, very clear that there must be an infrastructure, a large and professional
industry, manufacturing and distributing these. Now, in order for tens of
thousands of these things to be manufactured and distributed, you must get a
large supply of child victims. Where are they getting the kids?

According to the FBI, in
2016 there were 465,676 NCIC entries for missing children.
Similarly, in 2015, the total number of missing children entries into NCIC
was 460,699.

Now, only
a fool takes government numbers at face value. The above numbers are almost
certainly inflated—a kid runs away twice in the same year, and you have two
reports, for example. Many of the above are likely “kidnapped” by family
members in court disputes…there are many reasons for a missing person report
that don’t have anything to do with the sex industry. Let’s get a better feel
for what’s going on:

Of the nearly 25,000 runaways
reported to NCMEC in 2017, one in seven were likely victims of
child sex trafficking. Of those, 88 percent were in the care
of social services when they went missing.

--hmm, 88% of child trafficking sex victims are
provided by the same government that determines the suicides of people about to
turn state’s evidence. A coincidence, I’m sure.

So here
was have a “small” sample of about 25,000 runaways, and over 3,000 of them were
likely involved in sex trafficking, and that’s just in one year. So, absolutely
we have enough kids right here in this country.

These
pics and videos were on the computer so almost certainly relatively recent.
That said, for there to be tens of thousands of such videos, it’s safe to
assume it’s been going on for years.

I think it
likely many of these sorts of pics and videos were created in the last 5 years,
or at least have been around for 5 years, and with thousands of kids involved,
we should have loads of witnesses, victims of this sick sex industry, who have
aged into adulthood, or at least too old to be of much value to the
pedo-industry.

But we
don’t have nearly so many survivors. Oh, there are a few people saying they
were victimized by a system when they were children…but I could find only a
handful when poking around online. There should be thousands. I don’t reckon
they all commit suicide, but I’ve been to enough rodeos to guess the physical
status of these victims who are telling no tales.

Where
might the bodies go? We’re talking thousands of victims here, I just don’t
accept someone’s digging many graves or burning them all. Simply dumping them
randomly in the countryside or ocean just wouldn’t work, as those bodies would
turn up eventually (we already regularly find bodies in the woods, and body parts washing ashore)…and we’re
talking thousands here, with no reports of a bunch of kid’s bodies found in the
woods or at low tide.

Let’s
summarize:

First, it’s absolute fact that pedos are being
caught with large quantities of pedophilic material, so large that there must
be industrial level production of that material.

Second, we’re missing so many kids that it’s quite
reasonable, and supported by data, to assume that thousands of them are
involved in the industrial level production of that material.

Third, this has been going on long enough, with
enough kids involved, that we should have hundreds, more likely thousands, of
victims, if they were alive, coming forward to say they were victimized.

Fourth, we don’t even have dozens of victims coming
forward.

We
definitely have an industry, we definitely have thousands of victims. The most
straightforward explanation for the lack of living witness is they aren’t
living any more so, again, where might the bodies be?

The above
report made the rounds a few years ago, and the evidence was passed off as
“skin flakes.” Yeah, maybe. If this explanation held true, then we’d have
similar studies for chicken and beef.

We don’t.
And the bodies are disappearing somehow.

Now, hot
dogs and sausages are ground up meat, typically pig meat, so it’s possible that
the meat packing plants are part of a big conspiracy here—the workers would
absolutely notice a shipment of dead kids coming in to be made into sausages.
Besides, the percentages found were pretty low…I don’t buy this.

But the
bodies are disappearing somehow. How else might human DNA be getting into our
sausages and hot dogs? Cows and chickens have no real chance of eating human
beings, but pigs might…maybe it’s just coincidence that we’re only finding
human DNA in pig meat products.

Most people think
of pigs as cute little pink things waddling around, but they can easily grow
quite large. They’re quite capable of eating vulnerable humans, and there are a
number of criminal examples of bodies being fed to pigs.

Now, absolutely,
it’s possible that mainstream media is right about Pizzagate just being a huge
hoax—considering how many things they’ve been dead wrong about, I concede
they’ve got to be right about something, at some point.

But I again want
to look at the big picture. There must be a huge industry, there must be
thousands of victims, these victims are disappearing. It’s clearly possible to
check to see if a pig has been eating humans, and it’s clearly possible that
one way to get rid of a human corpse is to feed it to pigs. It seems prudent to
check the pigs.

We have hundreds
of millions of dollars to spend on the Trump-Russia collusion investigation.
Mainstream media assures me repeatedly this collusion is not a hoax, despite
the lack of evidence or even coherent arguments explaining why this collusion
must exist.

On the other
hand, we have evidence and a reasonable argument to lead us to believe that a
huge industry exists which kills off large numbers of children…why is there no
money to investigate the pig farms and see if anything can be found?

Something worries
me even more. I’m not particularly bright, I managed to connect the dots of
“40,000 pics/videos,” “thousands of victims,” and “insufficient living
witnesses” to arrive at “where are the bodies?”…and yet we have police
detectives and Federal investigators by the tens of thousands across this
country.

Why have none of
them been able to see that there’s something wrong on a large scale here? Are they
the same ones that keep telling us a man can hang himself and then go for a
walk?