Hamas Leader: We'll Accept Israel Within 1967 Borders

An interview with Khaled Meshaal

by Rainer Rupp

Khaled Meshaal is the political leader of the
Palestinian Hamas movement, which earlier this year came to power with a large
majority in the free and democratic election in Palestine. In summer 2006, Israeli
Minister of Justice Haim Ramon publicly confirmed his government's order to
kill Khaled Meshaal. In 1997 in Amman, Jordan, Meshaal survived a assassination
attempt by Israel's secret service Mossad by a narrow margin. Currently, the
Hamas leader lives in Syrian asylum in Damascus under strong security. Khaled,
a physicist, is married and has three daughters and four sons. He was interviewed
by Rainer Rupp (RR), a German journalist for the daily Junge Welt, published
in Berlin with nationwide distribution.

RR: Mr. Khaled Meshaal, as a leading politician of Hamas you are on the
assassination list of the Israeli intelligence service. How did you become a
member of the Islamic resistance movement against Israeli occupation?

KM: Actually, I am one of the founders of the Hamas movement. Inside Hamas,
the most prominent figure was the late Sheik Ahmed Yassin. When the Hamas movement
was established in the year 1987, I was 31 years old. I was among the people
who had built up branches inside and outside Palestine. But the very idea of
Hamas started already at the end of the Seventies. The internal dialogue and
deliberation lasted for more than 10 years in order to establish a movement
against Israeli occupation. But the very project of the movement had already
been in my heart and in my mind when I was still at Kuwait University. At the
age of 21, I represented the Islamic movement in the students' general union
at university.

RR: For many years there has been the suggestion in the Western media that
Israeli intelligence was instrumental in the creation of Hamas. I suppose you
know about this story?

KM: Unfortunately this tale is told by some Arabs, Palestinian Arabs. It is
an attempt to distort the image of our movement. We consider this charge as
something so ridiculous, that we don't even bother to deny it. It is so illogical.
How come, that Israel should establish an organization that will combat Israel,
how is that possible?

RR: The argument is, the Israelis helped to create Hamas in order to divide
the Palestinian resistance and weaken the Fatah movement.

KM: Indeed, during the Seventies, the main Palestinian force that was combating
Israel was the Fatah movement. Consequently, Israel concentrated its fighting
against Fatah and the other, smaller groups of Palestinian resistance, which
existed in this period. At that time, however, Hamas was not yet properly established.
We were only starting to build our social base in Palestinian society, by focusing
entirely on social affairs, organizing help, building hospitals and schools,
looking after the sick and deprived. In that era, we were only involved in peaceful
actions. This is why Israel did not do anything against us.

Because they did not know at the time what was going on in our minds. But,
while we were focussing outwardly only on social and educational work, at the
same time we were secretly already training and preparing for our future resistance
projects. Because the Israelis did not see this danger, they concentrated their
actions against other brigades, not against us. And it is this Israeli inaction
against us which some Palestinian Arab elements unfriendly towards Hamas present
as "proof" that Israel was supporting the creation of Hamas.

RR:Recently, Hamas' relations with the Fatah movement have been
very strained. Is there still a chance for a national unity government?

KM: There is a positive atmosphere between the movement of Hamas and Fatah
to create a unity government. Since month one we have agreed in principle on
the creation of such a unity government. Recently, however, some obstacles have
started to appear. The first obstacle was that there were efforts to bring us
back to a "government of technocrats," not forward to the national
unity government. This is how they want to remove Hamas from the government.
And the second obstacle is that the guarantees for lifting the blockade are
still not sufficient.

RR:Guarantees? Guarantees from the West?

KM: Yes, from America.

We made an agreement, that once we have formed a government of national unity,
the siege shall be lifted. Hamas is very serious about this. We are keen to
end the suffering of the Palestinian people. But as our movement got the majority
of votes and has the most seats in parliament, we also have the right to have
the major influence in this government. The main dilemma now is that there are
forces which deny us this right.

RR: One of the key issues is the so-called recognition of "Israel's
right to exist." Is Hamas prepared to change its position on this matter?
Especially as the West has made this issue a condition sine qua non for
the lifting of the blockade against a Hamas-led Palestinian government.

KM: I think the Western world has understood by now that Hamas will never recognize
Israel. How can I recognize the one who occupies my land? It is illogical that
it is demanded of Hamas to recognize Israel. I am the victim. I am the man who
is not free. I am the man living in the Diaspora away from my land. Israel has
got a kind of a nation that was imposed as a fait accompli by the United
Nations. We don't have a nation. More than half of the Palestinian people are
living in the Diaspora, mostly in camps, and they can't go home. Because of
Israel they can't go home – and we should recognize Israel? Who is actually
in the wrong, us or Israel?

RR: But the two-state theory which the Americans are promoting envisages
a Palestinian state next to an Israeli state. Is this also absolutely unacceptable
for Hamas?

KM: No. No. Let me say that the Hamas movement will only establish a Palestinian
state within the borders of 1967; that includes East Jerusalem and the West
Bank. Up till now, Israel does not recognize this right for us. All the Palestinians
are demanding is this right. But Israel keeps violating Palestinian rights,
and the West is unwilling to force Israel to recognize the Palestinian rights.

Even when President Bush talked about a Palestinian state, it was not clear
cut. And Ariel Sharon and recently Ehud Olmert have made a lot of reservations
about Bush's proposal. They are rejecting the idea of an Israeli state within
its 1967 borders. They want an Israeli state, which includes parts of the West
Bank. Actually, President Bush had even agreed to Sharon's proposal for Israel
to keep all of Jerusalem. And he agreed with Sharon to choose the right Palestinian
leader who would accept all this.

RR: Have I understood you correctly that you would be prepared to negotiate
with Israel and accept it within its borders of 1967, before it started its
wars of aggression, stealing Palestinian land?

KM: Good, that has been made clear.

RR:In the West, Hamas is generally depicted as being absolutely
against talks with Israel and [it's believed] that Hamas only wants to drive
the Israeli Jews into the sea.

KM: This is not correct. Killing Jews is not our aim. For centuries we have
lived in Palestine peacefully with Jews and Christians of all kinds. We are
fighting Israel because it occupies our land and oppresses our people. We are
fighting Israel to finish this occupation. We want to live freely on our land
just as other nations. We want to have our own country just like other people.
But the Zionist movement came from all over the world to occupy our land. And
the real owner of the land has been kicked out. This is the root of the problem.

Because of many factors, we now accept to build a Palestinian state within
the borders of 1967. But that doesn't mean that we recognize Israel. But we
are prepared to make a long-term truce with Israel. Accepting the status of
Israel without recognizing it.

RR:But no recognition? Doesn't that mean continued tensions and
war?

KM: No. There are plenty of examples where no recognition does not mean war.
China and Taiwan, for example, have not recognized each other, but they trade
and cooperate with each other. By withholding a formal recognition, we just
don't want to give Israel the legitimacy for having taken our land in the first
place.

RR: It is no secret that for many years under the Fatah government the Palestine
security services have been trained and equipped by the Americans, namely the
CIA. Is it therefore not reasonable to assume that a whole lot of people in
the movement of the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas are secretly working
for the Americans and Israelis, some possibly in top positions? How far could
you trust Fatah if you were to build a national unity government together?

KM: This problem is well-known for us and for the rest of the Palestinians.
But not all of the people of Fatah are of this kind. There is a huge motivation
within Fatah, which is "nationality." They are our partners in the
resistance. But there are others, the people you spoke about. That is a fact.
We know the problem quite well and we are dealing with it. Moreover, the relationship
is not, by necessity, always based upon trust.

RR:Do you think that this problem is also at the root of the difficulties
you are having right now with Fatah in creating a unity government?

KM: Yes, that's right. This is one of the problems. Unfortunately, there are
these factors and pressures which are following foreign agendas that influence
negatively the Palestinian arena. But the patriotic forces are the ones that
are going to win. The Palestinian people have confirmed this in the latest democratic
elections.

RR: Is Hamas a movement of religious fanatics, as it is portrayed in the
West? A movement with which one cannot deal? Yet Hamas has been accepted and
invited to Moscow by the Russian government and here (in Syria) you are guests
of a secular state. Is this all a disguise? Which is the true Hamas?

KM: Well, let me give you an example. We have, for instance, good relations
with Christians

RR:Are you actually working together with the Christians in Palestine?

KM: Yes, with some of them.

This image of religious fanaticism has been fabricated by Israel and the American
administration. It is an image that does not reflect the facts. You know that
the American administration gives itself the right to classify people just the
way they like. But how can respectable states in Europe, like Britain, Germany,
or France, be influenced by this propaganda? Should they not search for the
truth themselves? Should they not form their views on the basis of reason instead
of rumors and hearsay?

But how should the West discover the truth about Palestine and Hamas? First,
the Western journalists should come here to meet the people and see the facts
with their own eyes. Go to Palestine and see how the people live. Listen to
what the people have to say. Listen to leaders of Hamas and other Palestinian
movements. You should learn the truth through direct contacts and not through
others. And if you want to know about Hamas, then go and meet the people from
Hamas. We are ready for dialogue.

If you are looking for reasons why Hamas won the election, then it is because
the Palestinian people trust us and because Hamas reflects the feelings and
the aspirations of the Palestinian people. And if you scrutinize Hamas closely,
then you will not find any corruption whatsoever. But you will find that Hamas
is very close to the people, that it is really serving the needs of the people.
And if the people of Palestine elected Hamas, then the will of the people should
be respected also by the West.

RR:But what about the reproach of religious fanaticism?

KM: That is easy to refute. If Hamas was a movement of religious fanatics,
it wouldn't have been elected by the Palestinian people, because in Palestine
there are many groups. And there are also Christians, who work together with
us. For instance, one of the members of parliament in Gaza who was elected on
the Hamas list is a Christian doctor. And the majority of Muslims and Christians
gave him their vote. The fact is that the ideas of Hamas are moderate. We practice
tolerance with everybody. And we deal with Muslims and Christians at the same
level. And on this level we deal with everybody, either religious, liberal,
or secular, either inside or outside of Palestine. And we have relations within
the Middle East but also in Europe and Africa. Hamas is an open movement. We
do not combat Israel because they are Jews but because they are occupying our
land.

RR: The West is reproaching you that in this fight against Israel you are
committing acts of terrorism.

KM: No. There is a major difference between terrorism and resistance. We are
against terrorism. Resistance is not terrorism. What Israel is doing is terrorism.
What we are doing is resistance. Because it is a reaction against the Israeli
aggression and a reaction against the Israeli occupation of our land. The resistance
is the legal right to defend ourselves.