Daniel Diniz <ajaksu at gmail.com> added the comment:
R. David Murray wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 at 19:49, Daniel Diniz wrote:
>>>> Daniel Diniz <ajaksu at gmail.com> added the comment:
>>>> Same patch as before, with a new feature I'm not sure would be so useful:
>> on
>> close, set stage to 'committed/rejected'; on 'committed/rejected', close
>> the issue.
>> The latter I would recommend against. I often set stage to
> 'committed/rejected' when I set a ticket to pending, and I think that
> provides useful information since it differentiates it from a ticket set
> to pending because the submitter hasn't provided a reproducible test case.
Yeah, felt a bit too restrictive to me too. It's not a major issue
nor a RFE I'd argue about, so much so I already submitted a patch
without this part :)
> But that's IMO, of course :), especially considering that I have
> at least once set the stage and forgotten to set close.
I usually do opposite, forgetting to set stage on closing. But it
causes no real issues, so let's drop the auto-thing.
_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue256>
_______________________________________________________