"Mr Archer refers to Mr Fred Leuchter's
findings, but it was not Mr Leuchter's findings that
impressed me , it was (and still is) the findings of the
forensic laboratory in New England which tested the
samples he retrieved from Auschwitz. Nobody has
challenged their competence or integrity."

In case you haven't heard, Dr. James Roth, the
laboratory manager of Alpha Analytical Laboratories, has
stated categorically that the samples given to him by
Leuchter were completely worthless, as
were the results.

What Roth clearly stated in Mr. Death, in which
you yourself also appear, is that cyanide is a
SURFACE contaminant, and only
permeates about 10 microns. A human hair is 100 microns. By
testing a big chunk of brick or cement, Roth stated that the
sample was diluted thousands of times. Since Leuchter did
not explain what he wanted to have tested, Roth's lab
couldn't possibly have created valid results.

The man who performed the tests. He has challenged
their integrity. He says the results were
worthless.

You, of course, continue to hang your hat on this
worthless data, and publicly brag about it. What a piece of
work you are.

AH YES, the malleable Dr James
Roth. I have no idea what is his worth as a human being,
or his religion either for that matter, but to have risen to
head a forensic laboratory his pronunciations might be
thought to have scientific weight, particularly his original
ones, untroubled by concerns for political
correctness.

As the Leuchter Report
showed, his staff carried out tests on forty-eight (I think)
samples of cement and mortar taken from inside the so-called
homidical gas chamber at Auschwitz,
and from inside and outside the fumigation chamber (where
cyanide definitely was used as a pesticide to
fumigate the slave-laborers' lice-infested clothing).

What embarrassed the Holocaust
Industry, and why they decided effectively to kill off
Fred Leuchter for enabling the tests, was that Roth's
laboratory tests showed no significant trace of
cyanide compounds in the "gas chamber" where allegedly
millions were gassed with cyanide 1942-1944, but substantial
quantities in the brickwork of the fumigation chamber (141
mg. of Ferric Ferro-Cyanide per Kg, if my memory serves, a
particularly weather-durable and hardy cyanide compound,
better known as the Prussian Blue dyestuff).

Alas, Roth belatedly learned that
the anonymous samples he had tested came from Auschwitz.
Suddenly this outraged executive hung a yoo-ey, i.e. he went
through what precision scientists might call a 180-degree
turn. In other words he pinned his reddened face on the back
of his head, went into reverse, and he even declared (on
film) that had he known the samples came from the gas
chamber at Auschwitz he would have reached a totally
different conclusion.

His alleged statement that cyanide
compounds penetrate only 10 micron into brickwork, in the
fabric of a building, or one-tenth the thickness of Sara
Salzman's hair, is ludicrous.

The blue stain permeates right
through the brickwork of the fumigation chamber at
Auschwitz, and is visible even now sixty years later, on the
outside of the building, and the stains have tested positive
for cyanide. We have good photographs of this. Perhaps Dr
Roth should abandon analytical chemistry and take up
knitting in future. He makes a bad liar -- and a very bad
witness for the Holocaust Industry.

For the record: The standard
explanation of the Industry for the absence of significant
cyanide traces inside the homical gas chamber is that it
takes less cyanide to kill a human being than to kill a
louse. One human being perhaps: but a million, and still no
significant trace? Stuff that in your pipe and smoke it,
Sara.

WE do not need permission to include somebody's email
address. It is at our discretion. Yours is catamont@comcast.net.
Mine is at the foot of every page on
this website, and it has been since we launched it seven
years ago.