歡迎光臨clarkf0e在痞客邦的小天地

One of the remarkable interior battles at any thriving group is the would like to build up versus the crave to arm out into new areas. After all, if an concern is profusely delighted at one thing, shouldn't they be victorious at anything?

That queue of reasoning is expressly echt at Yahoo, Google, and MSN, today's iii largest search engines. All 3 companies are frequently expanding, and a privileged executive at Yahoo not long conveyed an central message that in essence aforementioned Yahoo is wide-spreading itself too sheer. Nothing unexpected there, since it's common for executives at rapidly-expanding companies to attendant opposed to such as belongings - but the comparison the exec used to gully this decision was instead unusual.

According to the November 18/19, 2006 impression of The Wall Street Journal, a narrative by Kevin J. Delaney report that this note is now far-famed as "The Peanut Butter Manifesto". It's named that because the memo's author, Yahoo Sr. VP Brad Garlinghouse, feels that Yahoo is absorbed its instance and assets as you or I would daub minor food - equally. Basically, Mr. Garlinghouse feels that Yahoo requirements to dedicate yourself to its resource use on a smaller amount tasks, allowing Yahoo to do a advanced job on those individual projects. (I will not reprint the entire state of affairs here, but if you do a prod on "peanut butter manifesto", you'll see various matches that have a replica of the full memorandum.)

While the note didn't name specific areas that would be hit by such as a headcount, it's a fitting bet that the job cuts won't be equally circulate. After all, that would be way too a great deal look-alike peanut butter.