Measure twice – you only get to cut once

In my column in March, I described how I was encouraged by the industry’s dialogue with government and observed that, despite most people’s views that Brexit was bad for the UK, it appeared we were looking to the future and trying to make the best of a challenging situation.

However, despite evidence that ‘Project Fear’ was starting to look like ‘Project Reality’, the government, and particularly Theresa May, adopted an increasingly uncompromising belief that a hard Brexit was in the best interests of the country, without any knowledge of what the terms of the deal might be.

The PM’s all-too-well-known “Brexit means Brexit” was cited as the only option for the government’s mandate based on the referendum result. The FTSE index responded positively, largely on the back of a fall in the pound that made those companies relatively cheaper and those of us in the UK all relatively poorer.

When I was growing up in Canada, my father and I used to do a lot of carpentry. He was meticulous about making sure we got out the tape measure and marked with a pencil exactly where the cut was to be made.

I have never forgotten that as an eager teenager I would be anxious to start cutting and he would always stop me and say: “Son, it is very important that you measure twice as you only get to cut once.”

This is the perfect analogy for what the government should have done before exercising Article 50. Whether one agrees with leave or remain, it had the responsibility to ask one last time - are we sure?

For six weeks, we watched a campaign in which the government was certain the nation would get behind the notion that this was good for the country, return it to power with a huge majority and allow it to show those Europeans we mean business.

Sending a message

Research undertaken by ComRes on behalf of the BPF showed that 71% of sitting MPs believed Brexit would adversely affect the UK’s economic growth, but the government still campaigned on a hard Brexit platform.

I buy the argument that a large majority would have potentially given the government more strength to negotiate a better deal with Europe. However, I had no confidence that the PM was interested in, or capable of, negotiating a deal that was going to preserve the strength of the UK and address the issues of economic stability, infrastructure investment, regulation, skills and housing that the real estate industry had made clear were critical to our future success.

My hope is that the government has heard the word of the people and will take a collaborative approach to find a compromise that sets the UK up for success. Although I wish we had “measured twice and cut once”, there may be an opportunity to get this right. Hopefully it is not too late.

Topics

Related articles

While the weather at this year’s Mipim conference in the south of France was lovely, particularly when compared with the cold and rain of a year ago, this year there appeared to be a heightened level of focus and seriousness.

With no party winning an outright majority at the election and the process for Britain leaving the EU to be initiated with key meetings shortly, the country still dealing with the aftermath of its third terror attack in three months and Trump ruling the US via a series of erratic ...

No comments yet

Have your say

You're not signed in.

Only registered users can comment on this article.

More Comment

It has been a year of increased scrutiny for the way companies conduct themselves and their impact on wider society, environmentally and socially. The European Parliament has taken a historic stand against single-use plastic pollution, while calls for action on global warming have never been

In these uncertain times, modern commercial real estate landlords and operators have turned to technology and data to weather the storm and gain a competitive advantage. Those that do so are arming their companies with an ability to quickly pivot operating models, reallocate investment to counter