As detailed in The Culture of Critique, Freud and his followers regarded anti-Semitism was a universal pathology which had its roots in sexual repression. The theoretical basis for this can be found in Freud’s Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality where he linked aggression to the frustration of human drives — especially the sex drive. Kevin MacDonald notes that: “Although Freud himself later developed the idea of a death instinct to explain aggression, a consistent theme of the Freudian critique of Western culture, as exemplified for example by Norman O. Brown, Herbert Marcuse, and Wilhelm Reich, has been that the liberation of sexual repressions would lead to lowered aggression and usher in an era of universal love.”[1]

According to this view, anti-Semitism, regarded as a form of aggression, results from the denial of sexuality, and the role of the Jewish mission of psychoanalysis was to end anti-Semitism by freeing humanity of its sexual repressions. Individuals preoccupied with sex were considered unlikely to concern themselves with the activities of Jews, much less to organize politically against them. People who spend most of their time in search of sexual stimulation are unlikely to organize pogroms or threaten the rich and powerful Jewish establishment. In his jewishquarterly.org /issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38 [now a hijacked site] widely cited 2004 essay from the Jewish Quarterly Nathan Abrams observed that:

Jews in America have been sexual revolutionaries. A large amount of the material on sexual liberation was written by Jews. Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish. Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Reich’s central preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction. Goodman wrote of the “beautiful cultural consequences” that would follow from legalizing pornography: it would “ennoble all our art” and “humanize sexuality.”

The hyper-sexualization of Western culture (the most conspicuous result of the Jewish takeover and virtual monopolization of the Western media and entertainment industries) can, therefore, be viewed as the practical ethno-political application of psychoanalytic theory to a traditional Western culture regarded as inherently authoritarian, fascistic and anti-Semitic due to its “repressive” sexual morality. MacDonald points out that “psychoanalysis has been a veritable treasure trove of ideas for those intent on developing radical critiques of Western culture” with these ideas influencing thought in a wide range of areas, “including sociology, child rearing, criminology, anthropology, literary criticism, art, literature, and the popular media.”[2]
Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

I recently noted how Daniel Jonah Goldhagen claims to be bewildered by Billy Graham’s “nutty” comment in his secretly recorded conversation with President Nixon in 1972 that Jews were “the ones putting out the pornographic stuff,” and that so severe was the danger that Jews pose that their “stranglehold has got to be broken or this country’s going down the drain.”[3] Of course Goldhagen is uninterested in whether Graham’s assertion has any grounding in empirical reality — whether Jews actually are the ones mainly responsible for “putting out the pornographic stuff,” and are thereby undermining the cultural foundations and supports for high-investment parenting and sending the country “down the drain.” A quick look at the output of Hollywood, and the individuals responsible for it, is, however, enough to confirm that Graham’s assertion is absolutely correct. Not only have Jews long (jewishquarterly.org /issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38 [now a hijacked site]) dominated the pornography industry, they have also been pivotal in “mainstreaming” pornographic themes and images through the movies and TV programs they produce.

Jenji Kohan — From Weeds to Orange is the New Black

To take just one of countless possible examples, consider the enormously popular program Orange is the New Black (hereafter OItNB). This show is the brainchild of screenwriter and executive producer Jenji Kohan who comes from a prominent Jewish show business family. Her father, Buz Kohan, a frequent writer for the Academy Awards, is the recipient of 11 Emmy Awards in a career that spans five decades. Her mother, Rhea Kohan, is a novelist, while her eldest brother, David, is the co-creator and producer of the gay-themed NBC sitcom Will & Grace. According to Danielle Berrin, writing for the “Hollywood Jew” section of The Jewish Journal:

Kohan could be the Jewish girl next door. But there is edginess to her — her hair perpetually tousled, and she always wears those signature eyeglasses with the art-deco glamour. … Her earliest fantasy was to be a famous actress-singer named Rainbow Star. But she couldn’t act. Or sing. Years later, after some time working in television, Kohan considered rabbinical school. But none of those whims proved as powerful as her (very Jewish) birthright, which has catapulted Kohan to many a writer’s highest aspiration, helming her own TV show.

Kohan worked for her brother David on Will & Grace during her early years, but decided his brand of humor was too tame. “David took the big, commercial, funny route; I was always a little darker personally,” she explains, “and not terrific within the system. I had to make my own way.” It was with specific reference to her brother David and the plethora of activist Hollywood Jews like him, that Vice President Joe Biden noted in 2013 how Jewish influence on American culture had been “immense.” Speaking of the prominent roles Jews had played in transforming American attitudes toward civil rights, feminism, and homosexual rights, he noted that:

What affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else. … It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace [gay marriage]. Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense.

In a similar vein, the Jewish writer and intellectual Chaim Bermant observed that “the Jews that came to dominate Hollywood” between them “did more to determine American attitudes and tastes than the churches or even the schools.”[4] This is hardly surprising given that, as cultivation theory and social learning theory postulate, exposure to media content leads to increased sympathy for the values embedded in the content, as well as an increased propensity to regard the fictional portrayals as representations of reality.

Noting how right from Hollywood’s founding Jewish ethnic networking and nepotism quickly led to an industry completely dominated by Jews, Bermant wryly observed that “Hollywood, the place, as it was said, where ‘the son-in-law also rises’ was the last redoubt of nepotism, but nepotism was perhaps one of its saving virtues, for it indicated, if only at a crude level, that it was not wholly devoid of charity.”[5] Jewish family and ethnic networking played an inevitable role in Kohen’s ascent to eventually “helming” her own show. She recounts how:

I started writing. … I quit all of my crappy odd jobs, and I moved in with [a friend who] was living in Santa Cruz. And every day we would go to these little cafes in Santa Cruz, and I would work on spec scripts and study these videotapes I had recorded off television of Roseanne and Seinfeld and The Simpsons. … What ended up happening was, my sister-in-law’s father worked in a building with an agent and gave him my scripts in an elevator. And he read them, and I was on a show by spring. And it took off from there, and I never stopped working.

In 2005 she was given the opportunity to write and produce her own show, which led to the dark comic satire Weeds — a show about the “peculiar nature of American domesticity.” Originally set in the fictional suburb of Agrestic (later Majestic), the show follows the widowed, single mother Nancy Botwin (Mary-Louise Parker), who becomes a drug dealer in order to maintain her middle class lifestyle. With the help of various disreputable characters and her useless and immature brother-in-law Andy (who is representative of Hollywood’s routinely unflattering depictions of White men), she raises her two sons, Silas and Shane.

The Jewish Journal notes how Weeds “routinely deals with many of the most provocative, controversial themes on television. Any given season has its share of lawlessness, illicit relationships and an astonishing Freudian subtext (in one episode, Nancy catches her youngest son masturbating to a nude photograph of her).” Freudian themes continue to exert an enduring influence over the Jewish shapers of Western minds, like Kohan, despite that fact that these ideas have long ceased to play any role whatever in mainstream developmental psychology.

According to the Jewish Journal, Kohan’s “refusal to limit herself in her show’s creative content has made moral ambiguity a Weeds trademark. No topic is too grim, no character too depraved.” In giving her the scope to explore these depraved characters, and to mine them for humor and ask questions, Kohan claimed that Weeds allowed her to get in touch with her Jewish identity, noting that, “For me, the essence of my Judaism is to ask questions — ask why, ask more. And in a way, the show allows me to follow that path of Judaism.”

After the critically-acclaimed Weeds, which ended in 2012, Kohan adapted the (half-Jewish) author Piper Kerman‘s memoir Orange is the New Black about her experiences in a minimum-security women’s prison. This series revolves around the “clueless bisexual blonde” Piper Chapman (played by Taylor Schilling) who is sentenced to 15 months in prison for transporting drug money for her drug trafficking former girlfriend Alex Vause (Laura Prepon). This offense occurred ten years before the start of the series, and Piper has since moved on to enjoying a quiet, law-abiding life among New York’s upper middle class. Her sudden and unexpected arrest completely disrupts her relationships with her fiancé and family. In prison, Piper is reunited with Alex (who named Piper in her trial, resulting in her ex-girlfriend’s arrest and imprisonment), and they re-examine their relationship and deal with their fellow prisoners. OItNB often uses flashbacks of significant events from the various inmates’ backgrounds to explain how they came to be in prison and to fill in their backstories.

OItNB is an incredibly degenerate show that inverts traditional Western morality and glamorizes homosexuality. The main themes of the show are that committed heterosexual relationships are abnormal and that Christianity is an evil creed, which, owing to its stifling sexual morality, leads its practitioners to become hypocritical bigots with twisted, neurotic personalities. The Christian “villain” in the show was sent to prison for killing a group of abortionists after receiving an abortion herself. Every woman in the prison, with the exception of the Christian villain, is in a lesbian relationship with one of their fellow inmates — even a nun.

Hollywood’s Jewish movers and shakers love to debase Christianity and Catholicism by depicting nuns in sexual roles. Notoriously, the opening scene of the pilot of Californication, a program starring and produced by the Jewish actor David Duchovny (whose father was a publicist for the American Jewish Committee), depicts a nun performing oral sex on Duchovny’s character Hank Moody in a church. This pornographic debasement of Christian symbols by Jews is a blatant way of defiling Christian culture. Kohan certainly has no qualms about such depictions, noting that: “When people have these sacred cows, my urge is to tip them.” Of course anyone attempting to “tip” a Jewish sacred cow will quickly find himself on an ADL and SPLC hit list, will likely lose his job, and if a public figure, will be relentlessly attacked by the Jewish-controlled media.

Labelling Kohan a “force of nature” Time Magazine notes how her “characters are a breathtaking riot of color and sexual orientation onscreen. Jenji shows a passion for diversity by creating characters of all backgrounds who are three-dimensional, flawed and sometimes unpleasant, but always human.” The perennial Hollywood themes of the nobility of sexual liberation and race mixing are particularly salient in OItNB. Asked in an interview why she included so much gratuitous sex in her show, Kohan responded by declaring that:

I want more fucking, everywhere. That’s one of my things. It expresses everything. It’s comfort, it’s release, it’s brutality, it’s companionship. It’s so many things. We’re all doing it. We’re all thinking about it. We don’t see it enough. Part of it is a dance with the [mostly non-Jewish] actors because it’s very vulnerable for them to do it. But if I had my way, there would be so much more, in everything. It’s so vital and integral in life, and it should be reflected in what we’re watching, if we’re reflecting our experiences. And it’s hot. I love the sex stuff, and I want more.

Kohan likewise told The Hollywood Reporter: “I love graphic sex, the more sex the better. Very often it’s convincing the actors to get naked. … You hope everyone will just be cool about it, and then they’re not. There’s a lot of convincing and making people feel comfortable.” Hollywood’s Jewish bigwigs have long used their power to make or break careers as a golden opportunity to gain access to, and sexually exploit, non-Jewish actresses and actors (and children). Bermant acknowledges that “the Jewish businessman has never turned a blind eye (a furtive eye sometimes, but never a blind one) to such attractions. The Rabbis have always been aware of a lascivious streak in the Jewish character.”[6]

Netflix, which airs OItNB, has been fully supportive of the sexually explicit content of OItNB, only intervening once according to Kohan. “We have some male frontal nudity this season, but I don’t think it’s going to be erect.” For comparison, Kohan noted the comparatively strict guidelines that Showtime (a wholly owned subsidiary of Sumner Redstone’s CBS) set for a scene in Weeds, in which “a dildo and lube were allowed to be shown on screen, but the character was not allowed to be seen applying the lube to the dildo.”

Elsewhere Kohan has opined that: “I think people need to accept their sexuality no matter what environment they’re in,” and observed how she is “a great subscriber to the Kinsey scale, where 10% is absolutely straight and 10% is absolutely gay and everyone sort of floats in the middle, everyone else.” Here Kohan echoes the Freudian “argument” that “a disposition to perversions is an original and universal disposition of the human sexual instinct.”

An article in Rolling Stone notes that OItNB has been at the forefront of TV shows challenging viewers’ perceptions of sexuality and gender identity, specifically thanks to the performance of “trans actress” Laverne Cox, who plays Sophia Burset, and openly gay actress Lea DeLaria, who plays Carrie “Big Boo” Black. Kohan points out that in her show “transgenderism” is “not confronted,” but is “seamlessly woven” into the tale of protagonist Piper Chapman’s time in a minimum security federal prison. “It’s not ‘The Very Special Episode about the trans character,’” she notes, “It’s normalized in this conversation.” One source, noting how OItNB has succeeded in normalizing sexual perversion and the idea of the “fluid” nature of gender identity, observed that:

This is the show, after all, that made Laverne Cox a household name as much for her sophisticated intersectional politics as for her laugh-out-loud beauty. A trans woman of color and the first trans actor to be nominated for an Emmy, Cox has consistently questioned the popular notion that visibility in itself is enough to bring about social change, instead using her position to publicize LGBTQ activism and to call attention to issues of inequality and injustice. Orange is the New Black makes its feminist points in a slyly subversive way: its radical themes combine with compelling storytelling as we are plunged, cellmate-like, into intimacy with the characters.

In response to news that one of the female staff writers on OItNB had divorced her husband and is now dating a star of the show after she said writing the show made her realize she was a lesbian, Kohan quipped: “I turned her gay. I made her gay. I felt like there wasn’t enough balance in the room, so I have a magic wand and I make people gay.”

Despite these flippant remarks, there is sound evidence that sexual orientation is, to a significant extent, environmentally determined. A 2006 Danish study found that, based on an analysis of two million men and women, social and family factors played a significant role in determining sexual orientation. In an interview, one of the study’s authors stressed that: “Prenatal factors cannot account for the variation in human sexual orientations,” and that “whatever ingredients determine a person’s sexual preferences and marital choices, our population-based study shows that environmental factors are important.” Culture likely mediates human sexuality through exerting an inhibitory or disinhibitory influence on certain sexual behaviors. Through its positive portrayal of homosexuality and “transgenderism,” OItNB clearly encourages marginal or confused individuals, such as the staff writer on the show, to identity as homosexual.

in one of the new episodes, there is protracted debate about the location of the urethra in relation to the vagina — a matter definitively settled by Burset, a transgender inmate (played by Laverne Cox) — and a competition between two lesbian inmates, Big Boo and Nichols (Lea DeLaria and Natasha Lyonne) to see who can seduce the largest number of inmates, with a special emphasis on orgasm.

Observations like these seemingly pass for serious cultural commentary in one of America’s most prominent and influential media outlets these days.

Sexual Liberation — Great for Goyim, But Not for Jews

As this critic’s remarks indicate, anything goes on OItNB — except anything deemed racist, pro-Christian, or anti-LGBT. Kohan’s own life, however, conforms to more traditional Jewish standards. She is married to freelance journalist Christopher Noxon, with whom she has three children. Kohan claims that it is her conventional domestic life that propels her into the darker corners of storytelling. She’s attracted to seedier material because, as she puts it, “This is my rebellion, this is my fun.” In an interview with Israeli newspaper Haaretz, she recalled how her desire to include a character named Yael character in Weeds was borne of the Jewish milieu within which she raised her children. “My children attend a Jewish school,” she said at the time. “I met a lot of Israeli mothers there, and the character of Yael is a tribute to those mothers. They’re so terrific. All the Israeli mothers I’ve met are terrific, and so is Meital. Yael is a character I constructed from all the mothers in our school. I always check where people are in relation to their Judaism.”

The tendency of Jewish subverters of Western culture (like Kohan) to not personally practice what they promote for their intended audience is striking. Another noteworthy exemplar of this tendency is the Jewish entrepreneur and “King of Infidelity” Noel Biderman, the founder and CEO of the company that operates a dating website named Ashley Madison which is designed to make it easy for married people to arrange adulterous affairs. The slogan of the company (which Biderman himself came up with) is: “Life is short. Have an affair.” While promoting infidelity (and profiting handsomely from it), Biderman himself says he is a happily married father of two and does not cheat. In an interview with the “A Current Affair” program in Australia, he admitted that if he found out his own wife was accessing his cheater’s site, “I would be devastated.”

Former Chief British Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, writing in the Encyclopaedia of Modern Jewish Culture, observes that while “the sexual revolution of the 1960s found some Jewish protagonists,” within Jewish communities “the primary response was a strong defence of tradition.” Within diaspora Jewish communities, sexual liberation was regarded as a direct threat to Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy, where “not only ethical values were at stake.” Noting that “Images of marriage and family pervade Jewish theological language about the covenantal relationship between God and Israel,” Sacks observes that, “the stability and fertility of families is crucial to the demographics of Jewish survival.”[7] As these comments indicate, healthy, functional societies coalesce around the propagation and protection of children. While Jews have endeavoured to sustain this coalescence within Jewish communities, they have actively sought to sabotage it within non-Jewish communities.

An egregious recent manifestation of this cultural sabotage concerns the one time child star Miley Cyrus who recently declared: “I am literally [sexually] open to every single thing that is consenting and doesn’t involve an animal and everyone is of age. Everything that’s legal, I’m down with. … I don’t relate to being boy or girl, and I don’t have to have my partner relate to boy or girl.” Cyrus’s transition from innocent child star to leading sluttish propagandist for complete sexual liberation and “gender fluidity” can be directly ascribed to the malign influence exerted by her Jewish manager Larry Rudolph. As Britain’s Daily Mirror reported:

Take a pretty young girl with a clean ­image, turn her into a showbiz sex ­goddess and watch the money roll in. That is what has happened to Miley Cyrus. And her steamy interviews plus semi-naked “twerking” routine are looking like a deliberate career switch under the guidance of a calculating manager, reports the Sunday People.

Step forward Larry Rudolph. For Miley, the former Hannah Montana child actress turned queen of sleaze, is just the latest in a string of raunchy products from his stable. Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera and Jessica Simpson are all his creations as well. The multi-millionaire businessman and former lawyer specializes in helping performers make the transition from child star to adult entertainer.

Middle America was outraged by the sight of former Disney princess Miley, 21, wearing a flesh-colored latex bikini and gyrating suggestively against singer Robin Thicke at the MTV Video Music Awards in August. How could the sweet little thing who played children’s TV favorite Hannah for eight years sink so low, asked disgusted parents’ groups. But her televised performance was seen by 50 million people. And cheering her on were Rudolph and her mum and co-manager, Tish Finley.

Rudolph, 50, a talent manager for 15 years, has been working with the singer since last spring. And he told the Hollywood Reporter magazine he thought that Miley’s performance at the VMAs was an absolute corker. He declared: “We were all cheering from the side of the stage. It could not have gone better. The fans got it. The rest eventually will.” Rudolph’s skills have made him worth an ­estimated £13 million but he came from humble beginnings in the Bronx area of New York.

Catholic intellectual E. Michael Jones has posited that the Jewish promotion of sexual license (and the increasingly full gamut of sexual perversions and gender-identity dysfunctions) is, effectively, a way of exercising political control over non-Jewish populations — a way of rendering them politically tractable by making them slaves to their passions. An example that Jones frequently cites of Jews deliberately using the sexualization of culture to destabilize an enemy is the actions of Israeli soldiers after they took over Palestinian TV stations in 2002, where they immediately started broadcasting an endless stream pornography over the airwaves. Jones notes that:

The Israelis have recently shown themselves well-versed in what one could call the military use of pornography. At 4:30 PM on March 30, 2002, Israeli military forces took over Palestinian TV stations when they occupied Ramallah in the West Bank, immediately shutting them down. What followed was a little more unusual. Shortly after occupying the Al-Watan TV station, the Israeli forces began broadcasting pornography over its transmitter. Eventually, according to a report from The Advertiser, an Australian newspaper, the Israelis expanded their cultural offensive against the Palestinian people by broadcasting pornography over two other Palestinian stations, the Ammwaj and Al-Sharaq channels. One 52-year-old Palestinian mother of three children, according to the report in The Advertiser, complained about “the deliberate psychological damage caused by these broadcasts.”

Whether one accepts Jones’ thesis or not, the Jewish hyper-sexualization of Western culture and assault on White heterosexual normativity is too ubiquitous and longstanding a phenomenon to not to have a firm ethno-political basis. Regarding the overwhelming political support of Jews for sexual minorities, the late Jewish author Charles Silberman pointed out that, “American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief—one firmly rooted in history—that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of U.S. Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.”[8] The Jewish professor of English at the University of Massachusetts, Josh Lambert, likewise noted that Jewish lawyers “believe that minority discourse deserves protection” on the basis that “the Holocaust was the ultimate suppression of minorities” and, consequently, for Jews, “the right for free speech became a fight for minority rights.”

The Consequences of the Jewish Hyper-Sexualization of Western Culture

The consequences of the erosion of traditional Western shaming code which enforced constraints on sexuality (the result of the triumph of the psychoanalytic and radical critiques of Western culture since the 1960s when the controls on Hollywood’s depiction of sexuality that originated in the 1920s effectively collapsed) have been far more deleterious to those lower IQ groups that are genetically predisposed to precocious sexuality than to diaspora Jews (higher intelligence being correlated with later age of marriage, lower levels of illegitimacy, single parenting, and divorce). A 2006 study in the Journal of Adolescent Healthfound that: “The strong relationship between media and adolescents’ sexual expression” is due to “the media’s role as an important source of sexual socialization for teenagers.” According to psychologists Richard Jackson Harris and Fred W. Sandborn in their book A Cognitive Psychology of Mass Communication: “Teenagers who watch heavy diet of television with sexual content were twice as likely to engage in sexual intercourse over the following year as teens who were light viewers of sexual content, even after controlling for other possible factors”[9] (see also “Research on Pornography and the Sexualization of Culture”).

The hyper-sexualization of Western culture has led to soaring rates of sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents. There has been an alarming rise in gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis across the United States. There has also been a surge in child-on-child sexual abuse throughout the Western world. Joe Tucci, chief executive of the Australian Childhood Foundation attributes this dramatic upsurge to the fact that nowadays children “have this diet of easily accessible porn, sexual imagery and distorted values around relationships and they put those things together and they start engaging in sexual behavior.” Social commentator Melinda Tankard Reist plaintively asks, “How much worse does it have to get? How many more five-year-olds do we want to have in treatment programs until we say that maybe it shouldn’t be a free-for-all where kids can access torture porn and rape porn and incest porn? Children are being groomed to think this stuff is normal.” It hardly needs saying that, as a result of programs like Jenji Kohan’s OItNB, the division between pornography and popular entertainment is rapidly dissolving.

The “pornification” of popular culture proceeds apace

Kevin MacDonald notes that “the most basic mistake Freud made was the systematic conflation of sex and love. This was also his most subversive mistake, and one cannot emphasize the absolutely disastrous consequences of accepting the Freudian view that sexual liberation would have salutary effects on society.” The psychoanalytic emphasis on the benefits of sexual liberation is “fundamentally a program that promotes low investment parenting styles.”[10] By contrast, traditional Western religious and secular institutions resulted in a “highly egalitarian mating system that is associated with high-investment parenting. These institutions provided a central role for pair bonding, conjugality, and companionship as the basis for marriage. However, when these institutions were subjected to the radical critique presented by psychoanalysis, they came to be seen as engendering neurosis, and Western society itself was viewed as pathogenic.[11]

The net result of the Jewish engineered sexual revolution has, as Kevin MacDonald has noted, been the establishment of a society controlled by a Jewish “cognitive elite” who politically, economically and socially dominate “a growing mass of individuals who are intellectually incompetent, irresponsible as parents, prone to requiring public assistance, and prone to criminal behavior, psychiatric disorders, and substance abuse.”[12] Meanwhile, at the other end of the social spectrum, Jewish activists have recruited the most intellectually capable elements from within White populations and used them (through a Jewish-sanctioned public school curriculum and a perverted system of financial incentives) to harm communities of their own biological origin.

The Jewish hyper-sexualization of Western culture seems to only intensify with each passing year, as the line between pornography and popular entertainment blurs. To protect White communities from the insidious influence of Hollywood we clearly need, in addition to exposing the ethnic agenda behind its output, develop an alternative and widely accessible media of our own that reinforces the cultural supports for healthy White families. While significant progress can doubtless be made towards developing an alternative media infrastructure through using new communications technologies, breaking the Jewish mass media and entertainment monopoly will ultimately require the acquisition and deployment of very considerable financial resources.

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Dear friends - I am pleased to announce the release of my latest work entitled Human Sexuality, Pornography and the Attack on Human Love, which is now available on DVD as a two-part DVD set. Each DVD is approximately 1.25 hours long and contains eye-opening and potentially life-changing information regarding the manipulation of human sexuality and its impact on our world. Beginning with the Rockefeller-funded "research" of Professor Alfred Kinsey, a well known sadomasochist and pedophile, and continuing on with the introduction of pornography which now saturates our world and has been moved into kindergarten classrooms, our children, our relationships, and even our ability to love is under direct assault. In less than one hundred years, the Luciferian forces have succeeded in manipulating us to such an extent, that our sexual behavior and attitudes have been radically altered, as well as our ability to create happy families and enduring human love. It is imperative for us to understand the mechanisms by which we and our children are being targeted so that we can put a stop to this madness and throw a kink in the control system that seeks to destroy our lives.

The information presented in this two-part series is brand new and is not available anywhere else. Although a portion of this material was shared at the most recent Free Your Mind Conference in Philadelphia on April 17, 2016, the majority of information contained in this DVD set has not been made available anywhere before. It is revolutionary in content and transformative in its ability to change our world.

Please share this link widely so that others will have access to this information. If you would like to receive a personal copy of this DVD set, just click on the appropriate link below and the set will be sent to the address you provide via priority mail (if you live in the U.S., or regular postal service for those who live outside of the U.S.).

U.S. Residents Click Here:

Canadian Residents Click Here:

European and Australian Residents Click Here:

Below is a glimpse of the material in the presentation.

UPDATE:

Tonight I came across an article stating that 40% of U.S. babies are born to unmarried women. This article was rather shocking in its content and reminded me of how important it is for people to understand the forces that have driven the concept of "family" into the gutter and used us to create a world that is filled with single parents, fatherless children and endless suffering from the wounds of abandonment and rejection.

In my double DVD set on pornography and the deliberate manipulation of human sexuality, I show how the Luciferian bloodlines have orchestrated the mind control of the American people and totally altered our beliefs and behavior in the realm of sex and relationships. The dark forces did this with the help of Professor Alfred Kinsey (pedophile and sadomasochist) who, through his child raping "research," claimed that children are "sexual from birth," and can benefit from having sex with adults. Kinsey also claimed that women are like cats in heat -- although the difference between human females and felines is that cats "have sex" in order to reproduce, whereas, according to Kinsey, human women just want to get off -- all the time, as much as possible, and without restraint. According to Kinsey, what women really want is unrestrained physical pleasure and to hell with the spiritual and psychic consequences of their carnal activity (which consequences include the murder of infants while they are still in the womb as well as the birth of billions of haphazardly conceived children who are gestated in wombs where they are not wanted and who are imprinted for life with the idea that they are not loved and not lovable and will never be loved or wanted).

Kinsey's "research" was cited by Hugh Hefner in the first publication of Playboy, which was released the very same year Kinsey's book about female sexuality was released (1953). All of this was orchestrated and paid for by the Rockefeller Foundation (i.e., the Rockenfelders who are Luciferian Jews). This was also the basis of the "sexual revolution" and the "women's liberation" movement, which led to the legalization of abortion and the creation of the highly satanic and evil organization known as Planned Parenthood.

In just 50 years after the publication of Kinsey's research (along with the mainstreaming of pornography into American culture by Luciferian Jews), the number of women giving birth to children who will likely be fatherless jumped from 3.8% to more than 40%. This is because women have bought into the lies about so-called "female sexuality" and "women's lib" and have come to believe their carnal activity is good for them and the way the Creator wanted it. Nothing could be further from the Truth. And American children (as well as children worldwide) are suffering.

To learn more about what I have just shared, I encourage you to check out my double DVD set and share the information widely. People need to understand what is being done to us -- and the fact that these same Luciferian forces have now moved pornography into kindergarten classrooms (with the help of Planned Parenthood's "Comprehensive Sexual Education Program," of course) should concern us greatly. This "curriculum" is preparing children for pedophilia -- which is exactly what Kinsey and the Rockefellers were after all along.

Here is a link to check out the DVD set. Thank you for taking the time to check it out.

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Jeanice Barcelo interviewed on Truth Hertz Radio with Charles Giuilani speaking about satanism and mind control in the medical system -- and especially during hospital birth.

Hospitals are Luciferian temples of the occult and the drugs they are giving women, along with every single hospital birth ritual, should be considered sorcery. The evil entities in control of the medical system (Luciferian Jews) are DELIBERATELY inflicting brain-damaging trauma on infants and the repressed memories of this trauma drive human behavior.

Sunday, May 15, 2016

This is one of the most outrageous pieces of Luciferian Jew FILTH that I have ever read. If, for every time this lying, deceiving professor said the words "white men" we replaced them with the word "JEWS," then we could say he has made an accurate statement. However, in true Luciferian form, everything in this piece of hateful, racist, propaganda is a Luciferian reversal and I am willing to put money on the idea that both the author of the article and the piece of shit professor are both Jews who changed their names to hide their identity. Jews have an agenda to destroy "the white race" and especially white men. And this cowardly piece of filth waited until the last day of his teaching career to expose his racist hatred. Check out this excerpt. Full article below.

“If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the holocaust, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others!” Professor Noel Ignatiev, a tenured professor at Massachusetts College loudly proclaimed to his class last Monday, his final teaching day before retirement."

“If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the holocaust, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others!” Professor Noel Ignatiev, a tenured professor at Massachusetts College loudly proclaimed to his class last Monday, his final teaching day before retirement.

The good Professor’s sound and reasonable words resonate with every enlightened and progressive mind. They are indisputable and no one can debate them. They should not be controversial in the slightest, yet remarkably a few far-right extremists object to Prof. Ignatiev’s advice. The Professor however, reported receiving “a standing ovation” from his “largely white and middle class students.” Prof. Ignatiev’s critics say that openly calling for students, even if they are white males, to kill themselves was inappropriate and perhaps excessive. In this article, we will look at the other side of the issue.

Fortunately, I was able to arrange a telephone interview with the professor. I felt he deserved a chance to tell his side of the story. A side that our radical and racist far-right media refuse to report. The transcript of our dialogue follows below:

Ivan Fernando: I want to thank you for agreeing to this interview. It’s a pleasure to be able to talk to an esteemed academic of your calibre and impressive credentials.

Prof. Ignatiev: Thank you. I am happy to talk with you today.

Ivan Fernando: I understand that a few people objected to your advice to your white male students on your last day of teaching. Why do you think that is?

Prof. Ignatiev: I chalk it all up to white supremacist attitudes. The goal of destroying the white race is simply so desirable, it boggles the mind trying to understand how anyone could possibly object to it. Those who object to my advice, knowingly or perhaps unknowingly, are themselves white supremacists. They wish to go on oppressing and exploiting other races and maintaining their own privileged positions of power. That is the conscious and sometimes subconscious motivation of all of my critics. That is why they object to destroying the cancer of humanity known as the white race. That ugly disease, which dares to call itself a people and a culture.

Ivan Fernando: All whites, or just white males should commit suicide?

Prof. Ignatiev: Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They are behind most of history’s greatest atrocities. Besides, some of the brothers like to bang white women. Eventually white women can breed out, but my feeling is that if you are a white male, you should kill yourself now. If you are a thoughtful person, with a social consciousness who considers himself white, you will consider suicide. It’s the right thing to do. Let me read you an e-mail that I received today from a xenophobic white-supremacist.

“I’m not a racist, in fact I am an avowed anti-racist, I just think calling for all white males to kill themselves is extreme. When you say that every white person is bad or advocate violence against them, it sounds almost as though you are becoming a kind of racist yourself. You say it is good for everyone to be proud of their culture. Blacks, Mexicans and everyone else. Why should whites be the only exception? For the sake of argument, supposing whites have wronged many other races historically. Should we punish people today for their ancestor’s sins? Today minorities have affirmative action and generous social welfare programs to protect them. Can we really say that most whites are racist now or that the government is? Should Blacks who descend from Blacks who owned or sold slaves feel guilty and be punished for ancestral wrongs?”

Ivan Fernando: Wow. (laughter)

Prof. Ignatiev: I know, mind boggling. What an absurd and irrational line of reasoning. They just throw logic out the window entirely. It’s impossible to dialogue with these people. Notice the blind and irrational hatred behind every word! No one has committed violence, genocide and dispossession on the level of white males. The whole purpose of white male culture is to perpetuate their privileged status and continue their oppression of non-whites. Whites don’t have a culture like other races in which traditions and customs are preserved as an expression of a common identity. White culture is an entirely economic and social culture which is about shutting out other people deemed “non-white” as a means of preventing their social and economic advancement! In other words all of ‘white culture’ so-called, stems from hatred of the other, unlike other ethnicities which do have cultures. White people are a disease, they are parasites! They don’t deserve to live!

Ivan Fernando: Yes, Absolutely, could you give us some examples though for our readers, regarding the racist nature of white culture.

Prof. Ignatiev: Columbus Day, whites literally celebrate the genocide of non-whites, delighting in it. Thanksgiving Day. Whites honour the Pilgrims who gave Native Americans blankets deliberately infected with small pox to kill their babies. Yeah, it is about being thankful, thankful that whites butchered most Native Americans so they could steal their land and establish a racist society based on white male privilege! Christmas is also racist. Should I go on?

Ivan Fernando: Please do.

Prof. Ignatiev: The idea of celebrating the birth of a middle eastern Semite, yet portraying him as a Nordic white person in visual art is not only racist, but obscene and Anti-Semitic! Of course there is Santa Claus as well. Who is he? A bearded old white man! He lives at the North Pole, it doesn’t get whiter than that! Who works for Santa? Of course elves, diminutive, perhaps slightly brown people, with pointed ears who have been enslaved by a privileged white male. Christmas and white culture disgust me. I hate this time of year so much. I hate going outside and seeing Christmas trees or Christmas lights. They should be banned! A Christmas tree is just one notch above a burning cross in my opinion!

Ivan Fernando: What do you suggest that people do for the holidays. Especially, minority families who may feel pressured to celebrate Christmas, or other European racist holidays? Is there an alternative?

Prof Ignatiev: A great Black Professor in the 60’s came up with Kwanza, a way to celebrate African heritage. Hopefully a Mexican-American equivalent will soon be developed as another Christmas alternative.

Ivan Fernando: I am sorry, but we are starting to run low on time. Let me ask you, have you suffered any attacks personally, or received any threats for your advice to your students during your final class?

Prof. Ignatiev: (laughter) No. I haven’t. In fact all the responses I have received, except for a few e-mails have been positive. I feel vindicated. Perhaps we are finally coming to an awareness in this country that the cancer known as the white race must be obliterated. Especially in the form of white males. Obama is president, and I think there is an excellent chance that we will never have a white male president again. I think we are witnessing the breaking of the back of the white male power structure. We will still have residual white males that must be dealt with, but I am confident that we’ve won. Eventually, I would like to put white males in concentration camps and work them to death just like they’ve done to everyone else. When they are all dead we can throw a party and dance around their corpses!

Ivan Fernando: I certainly hope so. I hope you are right. If so it is the dawning of a new era of peace and progress. I apologize Professor, but we are out of time now. Thank you again, and it was a pleasure speaking with you.

Prof Ignatiev. The pleasure was mine. Thank you Ivan. I love Diversity Chronicle by the way, I recommended it to all my students. Keep up the good work!

Ivan Fernando: You are very kind Prof. Ignatiev. Thank you again and Good night.

"If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world!"

On his last day of teaching at the Massachusetts College of Art and Design, Professor Noel Ignatiev reportedly received a standing ovation when he told his class that white males are a cancer and they should kill themselves, Jim Hoft reported at the Gateway Pundit, citing an interview posted at the Diversity Report.

“If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the holocaust, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others," he said, according to Ivan Fernando.

Fernando, who wrote the piece at the Diversity Report, called Ignatiev's comments "sound and reasonable" words that "resonate with every enlightened and progressive mind."

"They are indisputable and no one can debate them," he added, calling those who object to Ignatiev's outrageous call "far-right extremists."

Fernando said he spoke to Ignatiev about his statement in a phone interview.

According to Fernando's account, Ignatiev doubled down on his comments, attributing criticism to "white supremacist attitudes."

"The goal of destroying the white race is simply so desirable, it boggles the mind trying to understand how anyone could possibly object to it," he said.

He went on to explain that those who object to his call for genocide "are themselves white supremacists."

"They wish to go on oppressing and exploiting other races and maintaining their own privileged positions of power. That is the conscious and sometimes subconscious motivation of all of my critics. That is why they object to destroying the cancer of humanity known as the white race. That ugly disease, which dares to call itself a people and a culture," he explained.

When asked if only white males need to be exterminated, Ignatiev said that the entire race needs to be wiped off the face of the earth.

"Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They are behind most of history’s greatest atrocities," he said, while acknowledging in rather colorful terms that black men like to have sex with white women.

"Eventually white women can breed out, but my feeling is that if you are a white male, you should kill yourself now. If you are a thoughtful person, with a social consciousness who considers himself white, you will consider suicide. It’s the right thing to do," he added.

In the interview, he read an email he supposedly received from someone who took offense at his suggestion and called it "absurd and irrational." Fernando apparently agreed with Ignatiev's assessment.

Ignatiev also slammed Christianity, Jesus Christ and the celebration of Christmas.

"Christmas and white culture disgust me," he said. "I hate this time of year so much. I hate going outside and seeing Christmas trees or Christmas lights. They should be banned! A Christmas tree is just one notch above a burning cross in my opinion!"

Not only is Ignatiev white, he has a long history of controversial remarks.

The Washington Times reported in 2002 that Ignatiev, a fellow at Harvard's W.E.B. DuBois Institute and a man described as a "one-time steelworker and Marxist activist," expressed a desire to abolish the white race, echoing the statements he allegedly made in his class.

Ignatiev, who did not appear willing to lead by example, told Fernando that reaction to his screed has been largely positive.

"Perhaps we are finally coming to an awareness in this country that the cancer known as the white race must be obliterated. Especially in the form of white males," he said.

He then went into full "Stalin" mode, suggesting death camps for white people. "Eventually, I would like to put white males in concentration camps and work them to death just like they’ve done to everyone else. When they are all dead we can throw a party and dance around their corpses," he said.

"I certainly hope so," Fernando said in agreement. "I hope you are right. If so it is the dawning of a new era of peace and progress."

Sunday, May 8, 2016

In addition to the obvious gender-bending going on in this article, it is also a mind-bender. In fact, that is what the entire transgender movement is about -- bending and shaping the minds of young people, distorting their understanding of themselves and Creation, breaking down their natural inclinations and identity, and tearing asunder God's natural laws.

Luciferian Jews are attempting to mainstream this filth and perversion, but I'm willing to bet they will not succeed. Rather, what they are doing will cause a backlash against all Jews, including those who are innocent, and instigate another expulsion from yet another country.

ED Noor: After reading the following, please see: Radical Homosexual Movement Run by Jews . Basically this piece explores deviancy, as dealt with in the Talmud. Of course the “bragging” regarding inclusion from the Times of Israel has left yours truly with a roiling tummy; this material is just that deranged. The rabbinical portion is informational, not that it makes the topic any easier to digest. I am also going to ad that recently Israel partnered with an American PR firm to infiltrate and work with, among others, trans youth considered to be a fragile and impressionable segment of society. Apparently these young are beginning to openly relate to the suffering and isolation of the Palestinians and this does bother Israel…..

So here we have two Israeli men who are officially a child’s biological fathers, a male rabbi born a woman, and a genderqueer rocker talk about life as they know it. Personally, I am prone to go with DNA having the final word on one’s gender but then, what does a mere Western gentile know about these matters when up against those great rabbinical minds who can even defeat God in a discussion?

By Orli Santo
Source: Times of Israel, Originally posted September 25, 2013

NOTE by Chris Rossetti: Just as Jews tend to remake the societies they invade into mirrors of the multiracial, multicultural cesspools in which they evolved, so also they instinctively attempt to mold their host societies to match the high levels of sex perversion naturally present among Jews. Jews are far more likely to be homosexual than non-Jews, for but one example among many. As the two articles ~ from Jewish sources ~ excerpted below show, Jews have historically recognized and tolerated a number of bizarre sexual categories.

They are clearly infecting us with their own long-term psychosexual illnesses, which are today illustrated by such repulsive manifestations as Yuval Topper ~“born female [and who] underwent a sex reassignment surgery to become male, discovered that he’s gay, married a gay man, and …became the first Israeli transgender man to conceive and give birth to a baby” ~ and the “the all-transgender, all-Jewish, folk punk band called Schmekel.”

In the second article quoted below, from the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College, the Jewish author justifies what I believe is biological, instinctive behavior in “scriptural” terms.

What we are witnessing here is a type of evolutionary competition in which a species or subspecies (in this case, Jews) modifies its current environment to more closely resemble one in which it has thrived (multiculturalism, multiracialism, pervasive sex perversion) but in which its competitors (Whites) cannot thrive and are weakened. Jews do not all necessarily do this consciously (though many are intelligent enough to see this pattern in themselves, I am sure). But that they are doing it is, in my view, indisputable.

* * *

Transgender? Judaism’s got a blessing for you

This is an era of gender revolutions, and the Jewish community is racing to keep up. Enter Yuval Topper. Topper, who comes from an Orthodox family, was born female, underwent a sex reassignment surgery to become male, discovered that he’s gay, married a gay man, and in 2011 became the first Israeli transgender man to conceive and give birth to a baby.
Last week, following nearly two years of struggles, Israel’s Interior Ministry begrudgingly recognized both men as the child’s biological parents ~ another big first.

Granted, it’s a lot to take in. But Rabbi Elliot Kukla, above, a leading Jewish educator on LGBT rights, says this is nothing new. Rabbi Elliot Kukla, is a female Jew who lives as a male.

“There’s a growing number of trans-male Jews who are getting pregnant and having babies. Finding ways to sanctify and welcome men who are having babies into the community, which is something previous generations of Jews could never dream of, is increasingly becoming part of modern Jewish life,” Kukla tells the Times of Israel.

The past decade has been hugely transformative for LGBT Jews. But while lesbian, gay, and bisexual people have become fairly well-integrated into most aspects of non-Orthodox Jewish life, inclusion of transgender Jews is still in its early stages.

The Reform and Reconstructionist movements have begun programs for transgender inclusion, the Conservative Movement is discussing creating more open policies, but transgender Jews are still struggling for acceptance and understanding.

‘Finding ways to sanctify and welcome men who are having babies into the community is increasingly becoming part of modern Jewish life’

“People tend to like having things in nice, tidy boxes, of men do this, and women do that, and challenging these notions can create anxieties,” explains Kukla. “To make room for transgender Jews round the table, we have to expand some of our notions around gender and sexuality. For starters, normalizing the fact that people can have different life-cycles and choices, ones that don’t necessarily conform to the binary reality of male/female, mother/father… to my understanding, gender is a lot more complex than that.”

In 2006, Kukla became the first openly transgender man to be ordained by the Reform movement. In 2007, he wrote the first blessing sanctifying the sex-change process to be included in Kulanu, the manual for LGBT inclusion. He is also the co-creator of Trans-Torah, a body of existing and new Jewish sources that speak to the experience of being a Trans-Jew, which includes texts for a Pre-Surgery Mikveh Ritual, Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Wedding Services, A Blessing for Chest Binding, and more.

As awareness grows, the rituals are being adopted by mainstream synagogues as well: Kukla says he was recently contacted by large temple in Los Angeles that wanted to hold a re-naming ceremony for a teenager coming out as a transgender man, two years after celebrating his bat mitzvah.

…Judaism remained a constant in Itai Gal’s life, even as nearly everything else changed. Gal, 28, a transgender man, was born in Israel and grew up in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, in a Modern Orthodox community. He underwent sex reassignment therapy in his early twenties, and during his transformation congregations such as Bet Simchat Torah (New York’s LGBT synagogue) provided a welcoming space.

Gal, currently studying for a masters degree in Jewish education, is observant “but in a way that gives me freedom to make decisions based on my own life experience.”

Gal ~ whose stage name is Ricky Riot ~ is also a member of the all-transgender, all-Jewish, folk punk band called Schmekel.

“Mixing traditional klezmer scales with punk sensibilities, Schmekel [which means “little penis” in Yiddish] challenges listeners to think critically about Judaism, queerness, and the sounds that accompany both,” states the band on its homepage.

The band’s four members were born female but now identify themselves on the masculine side of the gender spectrum: the band’s drummer, Simcha Halpert-Hanson, identifies as genderqueer and thus outside of a recognizable gender.
Instead of “he” or “she” Halpert-Hanson is referred to as “they.”

Though Schmekel’s lyrics often relate to the painful and difficult experiences of transition, they keep their sense of humor.

Noor: These four “artistes” expressing their Distinctly Jewish “sense of humour”. Note the Haman’s Ears. The titles of some of their extremely deviant songs are too obscene for me to repeat here.

If they find out that I’m trans/ They don’t recognize me with tzitzis and pants / Even though I have a beard and spectacles / They won’t hold my hand if I don’t have a schmekticle,” goes a song from Schmekel’s new album, “The Whale That Ate Jonah,” to be released this October.

While there’s growing awareness and understanding of transgender and gender variants on the liberal end of Judaism, says Gal, Orthodoxy remains a problem.

“Not everybody is privileged enough to be in this liberal Jewish community, where they have to worry about things like people using the right pronouns. There are still young people whose families disown them, or tell them they are not who they say they are, and send them to correctional programs,” says Gal.

For Topper, born as the only daughter to an Orthodox family of six in Jerusalem, Orthodoxy’s strict gender roles proved impossible.

“From early on, he was always unhappy,” his mother recalls in a TV interview with the Israeli channel Keshet.
Feeling chronically misplaced, at age 12 Topper convinced his parents to transfer him to a secular school ~ it was a relief, but something still felt wrong, he said. This nagging feeling persisted even after he came out of the closet as a lesbian at age 16.

“This was hard to accept,” continues his mother. “Being a religious family, we were worried about the community’s response; also, when a parent is happy with his own way of life, he wants the same for his kid.”

At age 18, Topper realized that what he wanted was to be a man. With his parents’ insistence, he began seeing a therapist, who explained the essentials of transgenderism. At the age of 20 he began hormonal treatment, and a few months later, in 2008, followed up with breast removal surgery.

“When they took off the bandages… I saw my chest was entirely flat: it was one of the most amazing moments of my life. The first days I just wanted to jump for joy, that I really did it, that it was really over,” he wrote in his blog.
With hormones, his sexual orientation changed, and he began taking an interest in men. The year of his operation he met Matan Topper-Erez, his future husband. In 2010, they married, twice — first in a private ceremony for the family and again in a civil ceremony in Toronto. Neither was acknowledged by the State of Israel.

Topper’s decision to get pregnant was one of simple practicality: In line with the rabbinical courts, the State of Israel does not officially allow same-sex couples to adopt….

Yuval Topper-Erez (left), husband Matan and their son. (photo credit: courtesy)
On December 28, 2011, Topper gave birth to his first-born son, Liri.

But that was just the beginning of the couple’s struggles: Israel’s Interior Ministry refused to register Matan as Liri’s biological father so long as Yuval Topper was also registered as a man.

Only last week, with the direct intervention of Interior Minister Gideon Sa’ar and chairman of the Knesset Interior Committee MK Miri Regev, did the Ministry give in.

Though the decision to recognize both men as the biological parents is largely touted by the media as a groundbreaking precedent, the couple clarifies that it was more a bureaucratic sleight of hand.

“Yuval has not been recognized simply as a second father as the [news] publications mentioned. Rather, his sex had been changed back to female, he was registered in the baby’s birth certificate as the mother, and then his sex was changed back to male,” Matan Topper-Erez tells the Times of Israel. “This complex process was not what we would have wanted… We accepted that solution, however, because the baby was already over one and a half years-old, and I was not registered as a parent.”

* * *

Understanding Transgender Issues in Jewish Ethics

The dominant approach to gender in Western society has its origin in Christian thought that understands both sex and gender as binary. In that understanding, everyone is either male or female, and gender and sex are identical. While Jews gradually absorbed that perspective, classical rabbinic Judaism had a much more sophisticated understanding.
The Talmud contains hundreds of references to other categories. These include, for example, the androgynos (a hermaphrodite with male and female organs), the tumtum (someone with hidden or underdeveloped genitalia), the eylonit (a masculine woman) and the saris (a feminine man). It is clear from even this short list that the Talmud recognizes that sex organs do not necessarily make people purely male or purely female. The Talmud also recognizes that an individual’s gender orientation does not necessarily match his or her sex organs.

And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them. (Genesis 1;27)

This perspective is underlined by the Mishna: “The androgynos is like a man in some ways and like a woman in some ways, like both a man and a woman in some ways, and like neither a man nor a woman in some ways.” (Bikurim 4.1) While the talmudic rabbis did not know about chromosomes or hormones, they certainly understood that sex and gender are independent variables, and they made it licit for people to be true to themselves in regard to gender expression.

In reaching this stance, the rabbis had to deal with several aspects of the Torah’s teaching that seem to dictate a different position. One of these aspects is the Torah’s prohibition of cross-dressing (Deuteronomy 22:5). The Talmud says that what is prohibited is falsifying identity for the purpose of spying on the other sex. The great medieval commentator Rashi says that the prohibition is limited to concealing identity for the purpose of adultery. The Shulhan Arukh notes that cross-dressing is permitted on Purim because its purpose is simha (celebration, joy) and that it is forbidden if it is for the purpose of fraud. In limiting the prohibition to situations of fraud and deception, the talmudic and medieval rabbis indicated that cross-dressing in a way that is true to the cross-dresser’s identity is permitted.

The other biblical prohibition is of castration. Of course, this is irrelevant for female-to-male transgender people. Most male-to-female transgender people do not have “bottom surgery,” in which case it is not an issue for them either. Contemporary Jewish bioethicists treat vasectomy as an equivalent of castration, so for those who would allow vasectomy, voluntary castration should be treated similarly.

In terms of contemporary Jewish ethics, several key values are relevant to this issue ~ inclusion, tzedek (justice), and briyut (health). People who wish to be included in our Jewish community should be warmly welcomed. In the spirit of every person being b’tzelem Elohim (in the image of God), their diversity should be understood as adding to the divine presence among us.

In a world where tzedek is often withheld from people for reasons of class, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation and family structure, among other reasons, it is incumbent upon Jews to fight injustice in all its forms. “We were slaves in Egypt.” Transgender people, subject to many kinds of injustice, deserve our support.

Briyut is concerned with both physical and emotional health. Preventing individuals from expressing who they are clearly leads to psychological problems. The mitzvah of healing is not limited to health professionals; it is incumbent upon every Jew. Supporting transgender people in who they are is part of that mitzvah.

…Our current understanding differentiates among sex, sexual orientation and gender as three independent variables that can appear in individuals in any combination. Given that reality, it is important to allow individuals to name and describe themselves.

There are several basic measures that Jewish communities should take. They should include transgender people in their nondiscrimination policies, including employment policies. To avoid embarrassment for transgender people, buildings should have at least one single-stall restroom and notices near other restrooms giving the location of the single-stall restroom. Programming to help people come to terms with the issues raised above should be a regular part of Jewish communal life.

The mitzvah that takes precedence over virtually all others is saving a life. In a world where sexual minorities are subject to ridicule and suicide, we all need to stand up for the full diversity in our communities.

Some would argue that this is not about the pollution of minds. They would maintain that there is no deliberate attempt to undermine the morals of a virtuous nation, still less the morals of its innocent minors. It’s more fundamental than that.

This is simply a question, they would point out, of a bunch of dirty-minded writers and degenerate TV executives getting together to produce buckets of sleaze for an increasingly debased public. Depravity, they would tell us, is not being systematically manufactured: it is the natural flatulence of filthy minds. It is the foul atmosphere around us, the very air we breathe. We are filthy, stewed and marinated in filth like dung flies, and filth is what we naturally produce.
Let’s examine this interesting thesis.

Jenji Kohan (b. 1969), a radical feminist and devout follower of Judaism, is a popular American TV scriptwriter. What I find truly astonishing about this Jewish lady, who enjoys eating Shabbat dinner with her extended family every Friday at her house and attends two different synagogues, is that she has managed to combine religious piety with the promotion of sexual perversion.

She has openly stated on more than one occasion that sexual perversion is normal and healthy. Hence she has no problem promoting it on American TV. After all, if sexual perversion is “good clean fun”, why not spread the happiness around and help nice American families savor the joys of incest, bestiality and other assorted paraphilias?

In a riveting article for the Occidental Observer, Brenton Sanderson explains that Kohan echoes the Freudian argument that “a disposition to perversions is an original and universal disposition of the human sexual instinct.”

Translated into the simplest English: we’re all pervs. Au fond: at bottom, when you strip away all the frills and get down to the nitty-gritty. As for chastity, female modesty, sexual decency, these are all later accretions or artificial developments that violate our essential natures or primitive instincts. A million years ago—when Stone Age humans were grappling with saber-toothed tigers and committing arson by rubbing dry sticks together, and life, according to Thomas Hobbes, was “nasty, brutish and short”—in those long ago times, rape and murder, bestiality and incest, were thrilling everyday events. Ever since then alas, it’s been steadily downhill all the way, until now we have —horror of horrors!— Western civilization.

Thus, in a nutshell, the philosophy of Freud and his kinky commissars.

In her scripts for American TV, Kohan has no inhibitions about dishing up generous portions of sexual perversion. Incest, for example, is openly (though subtly) promoted by the use of humor. In one episode of her show Weeds, the main character Nancy is shown tearing up nude photos of herself and flushing them down the toilet. This is because she has caught her son Shane masturbating over them. In a prurient 3-minute scene, Nancy is shown lecturing her son on the inadvisability of masturbating over her.

“It’s a little quirky to masturbate over pictures of your mother,” she chides him gently, her voice oozing with sanctimonious concern for his moral welfare. She suggests that it is “possibly” wrong that he should masturbate over his mother’s image, throwing in a trendy reference to the omniscient Freud.

Yes, Papa Sigmund would have understood and offered absolution for her son’s incestuous feelings that are (allegedly) universal. All part of the growing up process, you understand.

Nancy advises her son to continue masturbating by all means but to seek out a more appropriate object for his sexual ardor. Like the girl next door. Or a Playboy model. “It’s nothing terrible or unnatural! Sex is good, Freud said. Or Annie Sprinkle maybe” (re Sprinkle, see my “Sex and the Jews“). But hey, jerking off over his mom, that’s a bit “quirky”, isn’t it? Mothers, after all, are “possibly” unsuitable objects for filial passion. This all too obvious tongue-in-cheek prurience tries to pass itself off as cutting-edge sociological comment. If you object, you are obviously a Victorian prude.

Hey, lighten up man!—where’s your goddamn sense of humor?

Right. So this is the point we’ve reached. Sons being given pep talks on incestuous masturbation by their mothers is now, on American TV at any rate, a normal, everyday episode in a healthy mother-son relationship. This is something that would have been inconceivable to our Christian ancestors only fifty years ago; and it is still inconceivable in many parts of the world where moral standards have managed to survive and sexual decency is still valued. The scene is played for laughs, and the actress playing Nancy sounds pretty much like Jewish comedienne Sarah Silverman trying her best to keep a straight face as she does a comic skit involving “sexual abuse” of her pet dog, apparently licking her dog’s anus—much to the horror of some passer-by who witnesses the “hilarious scene” and reports it to the cops.

We are clearly expected to view the mother-son incest scene in Kohan’s Weeds in a similarly tolerant, laid-back light. This is meant to be seen as as a touchingly amusing vignette of family life in the early 21st century: an example of quirky, cutting-edge “Jewish humor” at its ribald, irreverent, life-enhancing best.

You don’t have to be a genius to know what is going on here. Sexual perversion is being normalized. And humor is being used as a corrupting agent to make it all seem palatable, trendy and cool. You are made to feel guilty if you don’t find incest funny. And if do find it funny and give way to mirth, you have taken the first step down the slippery slope into degeneracy by trivializing sexual deviance and minimizing its moral turpitude.

Maybe you found that little scene amusing? Maybe you’re wondering why I’m kicking up such a fuss about what tens of thousands of Americans are likely to find perfectly innocuous.

If so, you are part of the problem. You are not using your imagination. Ask yourself: is this sort of thing fit for family viewing? Imagine a nice American family—father, mother, son, daughter—watching this incest scene after dinner. How do you think the teenage son is going to feel about his mother? I’m willing to bet the entire family will be squirming with embarrassment in their seats, doing their best to hide their blushes.

Two things I can tell you for sure. Firstly, if that family are not acutely embarrassed, they’re abnormal. They’ve already lost the plot. Secondly, if they continue to watch this disgusting filth and chuckle over it like morons, pretending it’s hilarious and groovy. they are past redemption. Hopeless cases. They might as well hang themselves.

As for the guys who run American TV and manufacture this moral halitosis for the masses, they already are dead. They are the Walking Dead. How these people ever got into the topmost echelons of the entertainment industry is a mystery to me.

I guess the devil rules the world and looks after his own.

In the estimation of the Jewish Journal, Kohan is a “provocative, controversial” writer who has the guts to tackle dark themes and paddle bravely in foul waters. “No topic is too grim,” the Jewish Journal notes matter-of-factly, “no character too depraved.”

Time magazine is equally complimentary, calling Kohan a “force of nature” and lauding her for her genius in being able to depict shady characters who are “a breathtaking riot of color and [diverse] sexual orientation … characters of all backgrounds who are three-dimensional, flawed and sometimes unpleasant, but always human.” The fact that these breathtakingly colorful characters are also twisted and perverted, infecting the minds of millions with the virus of their depraved values, does not appear to trouble the Time magazine reviewer. He is probably a fellow club member, supping at the same table of tainted meats.

Kohan’s malign influence on American TV can hardly be exaggerated. She is all over the place. She has written numerous TV dramas and comedies, including Sex and the City, Gilmore Girls, Mad About You, and The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air. Every show mentioned above is a product of the Jewish imagination: Jewish writers, Jewish directors, Jewish producers, Jewish actors. For example, Sex and the City was created by Jewish writer, director and producer Darren Star; Gilmore Girls by Jewish writer, director and producer Andy Sherman; Mad About You by Jewish writer and actor Paul Reiser and Jewish writer and producer Danny Jacobson; and, finally, The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air by Jewish writer and actor Andy Borowitz and his wife Susan Borowitz. (See here.)

If this isn’t Jewish over-representation, what is it? Non-Jewish America is having Jewish values thrust down its collective throat, willy-nilly. It is being permeated, whether it likes it or not, by jüdischer Geist (the “Jewish spirit”).

Not all the shows mentioned above are as subversively kinky as the shows in which Jenji Kohan is personally involved, such as Weeds and Orange is the New Black. It is to be noted, however, that Kohan’s eldest brother David—whom she considers, incidentally, as rather “tame” compared to herself (see below)—has been the single most important influence in America for the promotion of homosexuality on TV. David Kohan was the co-creator and producer of the hugely influential gay-themed sitcom Will & Grace. It was none other than Vice President Joe Biden who in 2013 openly acknowledged David Kohan’s seminal influence in casting a veil of glamor over homosexuality:

It wasn’t anything we legislatively did,” Biden said. “It was Will & Grace. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. I bet you 85 percent of those changes are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense.

Commenting on the point made by Biden, liberal Jewish columnist Jonathan Chait alludes mysteriously to a “vast left-wing conspiracy on your screen,” without bothering to clarify what ethnic group is in the forefront of activating and promoting this “vast left-wing conspiracy.” Agreeing with Biden that Will & Grace was “the single most important driving force in transforming public opinion on the subject [of homosexual relationships]”, Chait adds significantly, driving home the point I am trying to make here:

“Think of it from the conservative point of view. Imagine that large chunks of your entertainment mocked your values and even transformed once-uncontroversial beliefs of yours into a kind of bigotry that might be greeted with revulsion. You’d probably be angry, too.”

Yes, so don’t blame me if I’m angry. Anger is the only possible reaction to this outrageous onslaught on the traditional values of my Christian ancestors, the values I cherish. For the concerted Jewish attempt to normalize homosexuality, turning what was once widely seen as a mental sickness into a trendy alternative lifestyle, see this excellent article by Brenton Sanderson: “The Indoctrination Game, Part 2: Jewish media influence as decisive in creating a positive culture of homosexuality.”

The ubiquity of Jews in the entertainment industry, as well as their “debauching” influence on the American psyche, has been freely admitted even by Jewish writers. Thus Adam Garfinkle, Jewish author and founding editor of The American Interest, points out in his 1990 book Jewcentricity:

“It is striking, one has to admit, that the cultural influence of Jews and Jewishness is what it is, considering that fewer than 5 million American Jews are influencing more than 296 million other Americans.” Noting the “increasingly salacious content of mass media”, he adds significantly,“There are Jews at every turn, in marketing, in media, and, of course, in the entertainment business itself. It does not take a rocket scientist to connect the dots: liberals are responsible for the dangerous debauching of our society, not least through vapid entertainment-culture garbage, and a disproportionate number of liberals who are doing precisely that are Jews. (Emphasis added, quoted here)

It seems nonsensical to assert, in the context of this candid admission by a prominent American Jew that Jews are largely to blame for the corruption of America, that what America needs right now is a greater infusion of “Jewish values”—whatever that’s supposed to mean. And yet this is precisely what Rabbi Shmuley Boteach preaches: that what non-Jewish Americans badly need right now is to be “healed” by the adoption of “Jewish values.”

The rabbi, renowned for his bestselling sex books with flashy titles like The Jewish Guide to Adultery and Kosher Lust: Love Is Not the Answer is precisely the type of rabbi whom Jenji Kohan would enthusiastically endorse. But how their shared “Jewish values” would benefit the rest of non-Jewish America is not altogether clear.

“Lust is the pinnacle of holiness,” Rabbi Shmuley pontificates absurdly in one of his popular sex manuals. “If you put love and lust together, love stands no chance.”

SEX-MAD RABBI SHMULEY BOTEACH“Lust is the pinnacle of holiness.”

I am not aware that even the Talmud says that lust is the pinnacle of holiness. The Old Testament certainly does not. This “philosophy of lust”, if we can call it that, so familiar to readers of the Marquis de Sade, is Kohan’s philosophy too and informs all her thought. Lust runs rampant through her scripts, rearing its head everywhere—even in Christian churches where nuns achieve “the pinnacle of holiness” through fellatio.

In Kohan’s bizarro fantasy world, almost every female in American female prisons—as in Orange is the New Black — is involved in steamy lesbian affairs with other female inmates. Characters take bets to see which of them can seduce the largest number of non-lesbian inmates. Let the camera enter a Christian church, as in Californication, and pan to a nun in her modest clerical robes. In no time at all, this demure devotee of Jesus Christ is shown going down on her knees—not to pray as you might expect—but to dispense oral sex to a stranger who has just dropped into the church to seek help for his sex problems.

The good sister advises him that what he needs is a blowjob. That will cheer him up a bit.

The whole scene is apparently a “fantasy”—which is supposed to make it more acceptable, because it’s not really happening except in the writer’s mind. But why do Jewish writers insist on locating their sexual fantasies—or the sexual fantasies of their characters — in Christian churches rather than in synagogues? I am asking, basically: if you are a Jewish writer, why pick on a Catholic church for a blowjob scene? Why not locate your fantasy in a synagogue? Are we expected to believe that blowjob scenes never take place in synagogues, only in wicked Catholic churches?

This 3-minute video, “A Blowjob in Church”, will show you what is being done to Christian America and its culture by sexually perverted Jewish writers whose fame is out of all proportions to their talents.

Ask yourself: how many sons masturbate over their mother’s nude photos? How many nuns fellate men in Catholic churches? The fact that these images are allowed to fester like poisonous weeds in the rich soil of the mass mind must give us cause for concern. This is mind pollution on a staggering scale.

Here is the illiterate YouTube introduction to this nasty little scene set in a Catholic church: “Church is a holy place for christians (sic) when they confess of sin (sic) not commit sin but in this video you see how the christian actor and actress is (sic) making fun of their own religion. So first look at your own self then blame others ok.”

Beautiful. Talk about sly and sneaky disinformation! The fact that the actor playing the “sinful” Christian in the scene is in fact a Jew, a debauched looking specimen called David Duchovny (pictured here), is conveniently concealed—apart from the fact that the entire series is a product of the sleazy Jewish imagination: Jewish directors, Jewish producers, Jewish actors, Jewish scriptwriters.

— § —

“I want fucking all the time,” Kohan gushes in an interview. “That’s one of my things. We’re all doing it. We’re all thinking about it. We don’t see it enough. It’s hot. I love the sex stuff, and I want more. I love graphic sex, the more sex the better.” (For more details, see here)

Brenton Sanderson notes:

‘Orange is the New Black’ is an incredibly degenerate show that inverts traditional Western morality and glamorizes homosexuality. The main themes of the show are that committed heterosexual relationships are abnormal and that Christianity is an evil creed….Every woman in the prison, with the exception of the Christian villain, is in a lesbian relationship with one of their fellow inmates — even a nun. Hollywood’s Jewish movers and shakers love to debase Christianity and Catholicism by depicting nuns in sexual roles…. This pornographic debasement of Christian symbols by Jews is a blatant way of defiling Christian culture. (Emphasis added)

Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein, deceased publisher of Screw magazine, uses almost identical words — see here — so Brenton Sanderson is not saying anything outrageously controversial. He is merely stating the facts. According to one source, Kohan has succeeded in normalizing sexual perversion.

For my part, I find all this kinky sex incomprehensible, given that Kohan claims to be a devout follower of Judaism.

We are told that she had toyed with the idea of becoming a rabbi at one time and now attends two separate synagogues, as I have already noted above. Every Friday Kohan and her extended family have Shabbat dinner together. Her elder brother David, co-creator and producer of the gay-themed NBC sitcom Will & Grace, often attends these semi-religious meals at her house. Kohan dismisses his brand of homosexual humor as too tame for her, explaining, “I was always a little darker.”

She says her pornographic scripts help her to get in touch with her Jewish identity. “For me, the essence of my Judaism is to ask questions. In a way, the show allows me to follow the path of Judaism.”

JEWISH TV WRITER JENJI KOHAN: “I want fucking all the time.”

I confess I am at a complete loss to understand any of this. It is totally beyond my comprehension to understand how two allegedly pious Jews, brother and sister, are both regular synagogue attendees and yet earn their respective livings by writing salacious TV scripts that openly promote and seek to normalize sexual perversion.

I can’t help wondering if all this ostensible piety is genuine or just camouflage. Do we really have a nice, synagogue-going lady here, doing her best to access deeper levels of spirituality that allow her “to follow the path of Judaism”, or is all this just cant and sanctimonious twaddle put on for our benefit by a lady who wants “fucking all the time” — a rather pathetic, unattractive, sex-crazed sleazebucket?

It is not for me to judge.

Jenji Kohan and her kind are just the tip of a giant iceberg. They are a small part of a vast underground sewer of filth that befouls the air of American TV — a media empire that now exports its unsavory products to all other parts of the world, infecting the minds of millions in many lands.