even so or some reason this seems like the strangest way a thread has moved from its original intend.GASP! we actually made serious remarks

and:

Muffingirl wrote:IVhorseman wrote:then you'd get 0. 0/0 is a mathematical possibility, since it's just zero things divided into zero parts.

I my have errored something their.The 0 is also a double player in the fact we where doing parabola graphs, so it's impossible to have a y-intercept, which would involve devideing by zero, (y=1/x, if x=0 then it's y=1/0)

how did this escape me? hyperbola, not parabola, HYPERbola

Act first, then think, then try to find a way to cover up the horrible mess you made.
Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes

Muffineater wrote:IVhorseman wrote:then you'd get 0. 0/0 is a mathematical possibility, since it's just zero things divided into zero parts.

I my have errored something their.The 0 is also a double player in the fact we where doing parabola graphs, so it's impossible to have a y-intercept, which would involve devideing by zero, (y=1/x, if x=0 then it's y=1/0)

This conversation is irrelevant anyway- I just snagged his Touch and mucked around with it for five minutes. He was taking the logarithm of zero to get that, not dividing. (you can flip the ipod on it's side to get a scientific calculator)

Ross_Varn wrote:This conversation is irrelevant anyway- I just snagged his Touch and mucked around with it for five minutes. He was taking the logarithm of zero to get that, not dividing. (you can flip the ipod on it's side to get a scientific calculator)