3 THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. After a jury trial, the Defendant, Charles Gregory Andrus (Andrus), was convicted of five counts of aggravated rape. On May 4, 2006, Andrus received five consecutive life sentences at hard labor. Andrus appeals, claiming he was denied the right to confront and cross examine his accusers. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS Andrus raped five women over a period of about ten years between 1987 and Rape kits were performed on all the victims, revealing the presence of semen in each. Fingerprints were lifted from two of the rape scenes but produced no match at the time, leaving these crimes unsolved. The cases were reopened about ten years later, and the Acadiana Criminalistics Laboratory, which uses various laboratories located within and without the State of Louisiana, linked the five rapes to the same male. The Automated Fingerprint Identification System matched the fingerprints lifted from the two crime scenes with Andrus s fingerprints. Andrus was then arrested and his fingerprints and biological samples were taken. Andrus s DNA matched exactly with the DNA obtained from the semen samples in the five rape cases. The fingerprint analysis also produced an exact match. ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR In his sole assignment of error, the Defendant argues that La.R.S. 1 15:499 does not permit the introduction of evidence generated in private laboratories 1 Louisiana Revised Statutes 15:499 states in pertinent part: 499. Certificates of analysis A. All criminalistics laboratories established by laws of this state or by laws

4 outside the State of Louisiana because to do so would deny him the right of confrontation guaranteed by the United States and Louisiana Constitutions. As noted above, the Acadiana Criminalistics Laboratory used labs located in other states to perform the DNA testing. Defense counsel did not object to the Acadiana Crime Laboratory reports when they were offered and introduced into evidence at trial. Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 841 provides, in pertinent part, [a]n irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence. Both parties refer this court to State v. Cunningham, (La. 6/13/05), 903 So.2d 1110, where the supreme court considered the constitutionality of La.R.S. 15: There, the supreme court held that a certificate of analysis of laboratory results was admissible as prima facie proof of the substance tested, provided that the statutory procedural requirements were satisfied. Contrary to Andrus s claims, the question here is not whether Andrus was denied a right to confront his accusers because the lab used to analyze DNA was located outside of Louisiana. This issue cannot be reached because Andrus did not object to the admission of the lab reports at trial. Andrus is not claiming that La.R.S. 15:499 is unconstitutional. Thus, Cunningham, 903 So.2d 1110, is inapposite. It appears that he claims that the reports in question were admitted in violation of La.R.S. 15:499. Andrus, however, did not object to the reports admission at trial. He, therefore, waived that objection. La.Code Crim.P. art. 841; State v. Howard, 04- of the United States, and all coroners, forensic pathologists, and other persons, partnerships, corporations, and other legal entities practicing in fields of knowledge and expertise in the gathering, examination, and analysis of evidence by scientific means are authorized to make proof of examination and analysis of physical evidence by the certificate of the person in charge of the facility in which such examination and analysis is made. 2

5 499 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/17/04), 888 So.2d 375, writ denied, (La. 4/8/05), 899 So.2d 13. Moreover, Andrus s right to confront was not infringed upon because the witness representing Acadiana Criminalistics Laboratory testified at trial and was cross examined. Accordingly, this alleged error is without merit. ERRORS PATENT In accordance with La.Code Crim.P. art. 920, all appeals are reviewed for errors patent on the face of the record. After reviewing the record, there are no errors patent. CONCLUSION The Defendant s convictions are affirmed. AFFIRMED. THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Rule , Uniform Rules Courts of Appeal. 3

STEVENSON, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2010 MICHAEL A. WOLFE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D07-4555 [May 12, 2010] A jury convicted

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JOHN MOSLEY Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL NO. C-150627 TRIAL NO. 15CRB-25900 JUDGMENT

The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 1, 2006 98719 ERNEST L. et al., Individually and as Parents and Guardians of NATASHA L., an Infant,

The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

TAYLOR, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006 ANDRE LEON LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D05-1958 [ June 21, 2006 ] Andre Lewis appeals

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DONALD DALE SMITH, JR., Appellant, CASE NO.: 2015-AP-00006-A-O Lower Court Case: 2014-MM-012298-A-O v. STATE OF FLORIDA,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00457-CR Bernard Malli, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 3013458,

05 KASSIN 9/23/2010 6:50 PM FALSE CONFESSIONS Saul M. Kassin* This is an important symposium on an important topic, and nobody has made mention yet of the fact that when a wrongful conviction occurs the

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-06-00242-CR BYRON TRENT BAYER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court Hunt

The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

Application for Local License Local Revised 2017 UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH INTERNATIONAL 36 Research Park Court / Weldon Spring, Missouri 63304 Answer every uestion. Omission or unanswered uestions will

No. 14-354 In The Supreme Court of the United States BRONX HOUSEHOLD OF FAITH, ET AL., v. Petitioners, THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ALEX CARLOS BAEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-2905 )

The Supreme Court of Heaven Cases Argued and Adjudged Volume One MCEBO MICHAEL METFULA www.supremecourtofheaven.com Copyright 2012 by Mcebo Michael Metfula. All rights reserved worldwide. No part of this

KGB FILES NOW OPEN by Donald N. Miller You can now find out what happened to your loved ones who were arrested by the KGB (technically GPU and NKVD, Secret Service) in the 1930s For many years my cousin,

>> HEAR YE HEAR YE HEAR YE, THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. ALL WHO HAVE CAUSE TO PLEA, DRAW NEAR. GIVE ATTENTION, YOU SHALL BE HEARD. GOD SAVE THESE UNITED STATES, THE GREAT STATE OF FLORIDA

Case 1:09-cv-00774-SS Document 45 Filed 01/31/12 Page 1 of 148 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION SCOTT LOUIS PANETTI, Petitioner, -vs- Case No. A-09-CA-774-SS

COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD Sheriff of Cook County vs. Jacquelyn G. Anderson Cook County Deputy Sheriff Docket # 1850 DECISION THIS MATTER COMING ON to be heard pursuant to notice, the Cook County

/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Plaintiff, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, et al., Defendant. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE) APPLICATION XXII OF THE

Engel v. Vitale 1962 Petitioner: Steven L. Engel, et al. Respondent: William J. Vitale, et al. Petitioner s Claim: That a New York school district violated the First Amendment by requiring a short prayer

The Rights of the Accused Abeer Shahid Doctor Terrance Freeman Pre-AP English II 20 January 2016 Shahid-1 On a warm, sunny afternoon in 2015, my parents gathered around the television in our family room

MEMORANDUM These issue summaries provide an overview of the law as of the date they were written and are for educational purposes only. These summaries may become outdated and may not represent the current

The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O clock M CLERK, DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI STATE OF

MADHUSUDAN LAW COLLEGE, CUTTACK, ODISHA ARMONIA 2015 MOOT COURT PROPOSITION 1. Himtal is a small underdeveloped town in north-west Odisha with a very thin population. This town is one of the coldest places

The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

The purpose of Child Evangelism Fellowship is to evangelize boys and girls with the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ and to establish (disciple) them in the Word of God and in a local church for Christian

Joseph Fitzharris One of the Vatican 400 Sent back to Chicago parishes after a 1987 conviction for abuse When he admits abuse to the Archdiocese Review Board in 2005, they don t report to the police Joseph

City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Capstones CUNY Graduate School of Journalism Winter 12-18-2015 Flaws in the Justice System: Examining the Angel Cordero Case Rose C. Itzcovitz CUNY

Model Policies and Procedures for Response to Allegations of Sexual Abuse 1 General Statement of Guidelines 2 The [name of diocese, religious community/institute, or organization] will manage the issue

Powell v. Portland School District Chronology October 15, 1996 During school hours, a Boy Scout troop leader is allowed to speak to Harvey Scott Elementary school students, encouraging them to join the

Kansas Historical Society Oral History Project Brown v Board of Education Interview being conducted by Jean VanDelinder with Judge Robert Carter in his chambers on Monday, October 5, 1992. J: I want to

1 EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE In this paper, we study something called corroborative evidence. A typical example would be a case where a witness saw the accused leaving a crime scene, and physical

The Each One Reach One mentoring program is a Christ- centered program. The main goals of each mentoring relationship are to help the mentee in the following areas: *Develop and grow a relationship with

Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Faculty Scholarship 2004 George Bundy Smith - A Good Lawyer John D. Feerick Fordham University School of Law, JFEERICK@law.fordham.edu