Through his TED talks, articles and artful trolling, Hanauer has become famous as a double agent for the 99 percent embedded in the richest .01 percent of America that has sucked up nearly all the gains of recovery. And in recent months, he’s championed raising the overtime threshold, a little-known protection for salaried workers that he says is as important to the middle class as the minimum wage is to the working poor. And just like the minimum wage, this standard has fallen to historically low levels.

In 1975, more than 65 percent of salaried American workers earned time-and-a-half pay for every hour worked over 40 hours a week. Not because capitalists back then were more generous, but because it was the law. It still is the law, except that the value of the threshold for overtime pay—the salary level at which employers are required to pay overtime—has been allowed to erode to less than the poverty line for a family of four today. Only workers earning an annual income of under $23,660 qualify for mandatory overtime. You know many people like that? Probably not. By 2013, just 11 percent of salaried workers qualified for overtime pay, according to a report published by the Economic Policy Institute. And so business owners like me have been able to make the other 89 percent of you work unlimited overtime hours for no additional pay at all.

The ruling from the Obama Labor department revising the cap, hopefully doubling it at least, is expected to come this week, which is why Hanauer is thrilled. (UPDATE: The new rule was announced by the president Monday. It will cover all workers who earn up to $50,400 a year.)

There are no silver bullets in an economy that has seen growth slow and inequality skyrocket for four decades. But this policy takes on the greatest weaknesses in our economy — wage growth and a soft labor market. Millions will get a raise and employers will no longer be able to rope two people into doing the job of three for unconscionably low wages.

Hanauer means to do good. But his arguments are even more compelling because he also cares about making money. This makes him eminently relatable — not only to his fellow plutocrats but most Americans.

There’s a reason that America would rather have a discussion about “mobility” rather than our actual problem — inequality caused by runaway accumulation of wealth by the the richest. And that reason is simple: most of us need more money and want more money. And we’ve been trained by decades of expert conservative propaganda that any attempt to stop distortions in our economy will make us poorer and prove that we are lazy. So instead of reverting to the sort of smart decisions that built an economy that for decades saw most of the gains go to workers, we’re drowning in the chimera of “personal responsibility,” a ruse to sell us into corporate servitude and massive transfers of wealth to the people who need it least.

You’ll hear Hanauer, the unabashed venture capitalist eagerly explaining how he built on his family’s business with a series of huge successes including becoming the first outside investor in Amazon. And you’ll hear Hanauer, the billionaire who thinks the Obama is too far to the right on labor protections, the billionaire who is warning his fellow plutocrats that the pitchforks are coming for them.

At around 23:00, Hanauer gives a distilled explanation of why inequality isn’t just immoral, it’s stupid. He has a great mastery of all the statistics that illuminate how dire the situation is, but he puts them in terms that speak to the people who sign our paychecks.

Here the five key insights that I hope every billionaire hears before it’s too late:

1. “Being rapacious doesn’t make you a capitalist. It makes you a sociopath and a jerk.”
Republicans have sold the lie that what’s good for the richest is good for America. But Hanauer points out that it isn’t even good for the richest.

2. Inequality is systematically starving the richest customer base and threatens capitalism itself.
Concentrating all the wealth at the top creates “a crappy business environment” for a simple reason: “When workers have more money, businesspeople like me have more customers.”

If current trends continue, customers will be as rare as moderate Republicans.

“In 1980, the top 1 percent had about 8 percent of national income. Today it’s closing in 24 percent. The bottom 50 percent of Americans in 1980 shared about 18 percent of national income. Today it’s down to 11 percent, down a third… So here’s thing. All you have to do is put that data in an Excel spreadsheet and just run the extrapolation out 30 years. The numbers are scary, right? Because the top 1 percent will control in the mid 30s — 35, 36, 37 percent of national income — and the bottom 50 percent of Americans will share 5 or 6 percent of national income. At that point you don’t have a capitalist democracy anymore. You have some kind of feudal system.”

3. Not every rich person is responsible for our problems — but they all could be screwed if they don’t do something about it.
“My very strong feeling is that concentrating all of the wealth and power in the hands of a tiny minority at the top is not going to end well, particularly for the people at the top,” Hanauer said. “No exceptions to that rule.”

A tiny bit of moderation is all that’s needed to avoid this, he says. But the conservative movement’s anti-tax absolutism makes even that tiny bit of moderation nearly impossible to achieve.

This isn’t the fault of every billionaire but if it doesn’t change, the consequences for the rich will be as indiscriminate as they’ve been for the other 98 percent for a very simple reason…

4. The economy is an ecosystem and government policies have helped to create this mess.
The conservative focus on the individual furthers the myth that government — with all its bridges, schools and tax deductions — doesn’t help you unless you specifically get a check stamped “WELFARE” on it. And it also alienates people from realizing that the great crises of our time — runaway wealth inequality and climate change — are systemic problems that can only be solved by systemic solutions.

It’s no coincidence that the trend toward inequality began in the early 1970s with the birth of corporate-dominated Winner-Take-All Politics. But conservatives have a vested interest in pretending this slow-motion disaster is a natural consequences of free markets. Then they won’t have to fix it.

But these problems are extremely fixable and to illustrate that Hanauer explains how policy feeds inequality, literally.

5. We shouldn’t be subsidizing billion-dollar companies.Conservatives claim to hate wealth transfers. But our economy explicitly promotes exploitative wages that transfer wealth from the middle class to the working poor.

This pisses Hanauer off for a pretty basic reason: He needs customers and he’s sick of his employees subsidizing McDonald’s employees.

“You’ve got this giant industry of free riders,” he said. “McDonald’s pays their workers poverty wages and not one of the people in McDonald’s can buy the products [of the companies I start]. All of my employees can afford to go to McDonald’s every day, right, but not vice versa. All of my employees pay taxes. All of the McDonald’s employees, they don’t pay taxes. In fact, they need public services like food stamps and Medicaid that my employees pay [into]. And none of this makes any sense.”

Help support nearly ad-free blogging at Eclectablog

With YOUR support, all regular contributors at Eclectablog are paid for their work. If you would like to send a check to avoid fees being taken out, send it to: Chris Savage, P.O. Box 32, Dexter, MI 48130. Otherwise, you can use this Paypal form:

Other Amount:

Want to make a recurring monthly donation? Enter the amount you want to pay each month:

Michigan Governor Rick Snyder has admitted to knowing about the poisoning of Flint's drinking water with lead. Despite this, there are STILL Flint residents who cannot drink their tap water without the use of a water filter.

LOLGOP on Twitter

Subscribe to FREE email notifications!

Subscribe to or unsubscribe from free email notifications when new posts are posted.Leave This Blank:Leave This Blank Too:Do Not Change This:

Your email:

Subscribe to a free email daily digest

If you'd like to receive one email per day with a list of all the previous day's posts, click HERE. NOTE: If you were subscribed prior to October 2016, you will need to resubscribe. This service is free.

Mitchell Robinson is associate professor and chair of music education at Michigan State University. His research is focused on music education and education policy. Follow him on Facebook HERE and Twitter at @mrobmsu. His own blog is at MitchellRobinson.net.

Susan J. Demas is a Democratic strategist, serving as vice president at Farough & Associates. She is a 17-year veteran of journalism and a syndicated political columnist for 12 years. She was most recently the editor and publisher of Inside Michigan Politics. Follow her on Twitter @sjdemas.

Tawana “Honeycomb” Petty is a mother, social justice organizer, youth advocate, poet and author. She was born and raised in Detroit, Michigan and is intricately involved in water rights, digital justice and visionary organizing work in Detroit. You can learn more about Tawana "Honeycomb" Petty by visiting honeycombthepoet.com. Follow her on Twitter at @CombsThePoet.

Ammara Ansari is a Masters in Public Policy student at University of Michigan. She is a board member of the Canton Democratic Club and Finance Director for Megan Cavanagh for Supreme Court. Find her on twitter at @AmmaraAnsari16