Possibly Donald is the greater bowler because he helped make South Africa great again during their period of transition. As for the better bowler, well that's anyone's guess.

However, bowlers bowl as part of a team so a lot depends on who is helping them at the other end. Would Donald and Garner have their superb records without the help of Pollock and Marshall? The same idea goes for McGrath and Warne, Lillee and Thomson, Lindwall and Miller, Trueman and Statham, and so on.

When I look at someones ATG team I look at the combination of bowlers and try to work out whether they would succeed as a coordinated team, rather than just look at each bowler individually.

Yeh, Garner just. The combo of him and McGrath would put so much pressure on the opposition batsmen.

I'd rate Donald as the third best ODI paceman ever, but I take Imran and Kapil in my team as two bowling all rounders ahead of him as I like 5 genuine bowling options without weakening the batting at 6, 7 and 8.

As a test bowler, hard to call. Donald just I think, but it's bloody hard to argue with Garner's stats. The guy was a beast.

tbh, I'm a bit puzzled by this idea that Garner was a support bowler or McGrath-like. Always thought he was incredibly attacking and kept his average and economy rate in check by just taking the **** out then laying the pressure on the new ****.

Also said he used to fart a lot which sorta explains why, with Hookesy's spot being in slips, Garner was on the fence most days instead of gully where he was a beast for the WI[/B].

No wonder he was known as the black wind

And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW

Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta