Next year A2 students (current AS students) will have to take 4 A2 subjects. Thisi is something I, as well as others I’m sure, am reluctant to do. Mainly due to the fact that doing something I don’t enjoy with no apparent benefits and some possible disadvantages is moronic.

The supposed benefits are that universities are more likely to take students with 4 A2s than those with 3. Most universities only take 3 A levels. The idea that it will benefit your UCAS is not true in the slightest.

The only universities likely to take 4 are Oxbridge they make it clear that if your consistency isn’t up to standards then you will suffer. An AAA is a better mark for oxford than an AAAB (seriously). So only Oxbridge students who are likely to get 4 As will benefit. Why don’t the school allow those who are aiming for Oxbridge and feel they can achieve 4 As choose to take four A2s rather than forcing the whole year?

There are also possible disadvantages for the majority in that it is likely that the over all standard of grades will drop with the increased workload and this will lower the chances of achieving the marks necessary for entry to the course.

Even if I was wrong (which I’m not) and universities were lying in their prospectuses and we could maintain our marks we should still be allowed to choose whether we put ourselves at a disadvantage, after all we have already narrowed down our options for the future (we have been doing so from as young as the age of 13) and should be considering our exact university course. The school shouldn’t choose what’s best for us, especially when they’re so astoundingly wrong.
I’m almost certain the reason for this bizarre change in structure is that we’re more likely to rise in “The Times” top 100 comprehensive schools.

the start of the third paragraph looks like it needs punctuation somewhere.

I'd try and avoid calling them 'astoundingly wrong', they'll probably just get irritated by that. Also I'd suggest saying "I, along with many others I have talked to" because "as well as others I'm sure" sounds like you've not really asked anyone else about it and it's just what you think. Which I'm sure isn't the case.

But yeah. 4 A2s is pointless, even if you want to go to Oxbridge. I have friends who did 4, and I'm so glad I didn't bother.

'This' is spelt wrong: first line.
It's 'are reluctant to do', not 'am'.
Full stop after Oxbridge. Capital T on They.
No 's' on the end of standard.
Capitalise 'Oxford'.
Last line of para3 - should put word 'to' in front of word 'choose'.
'forcing the whole year' - wut? Word missing?
Overall is one word.
Full stop after 'disadvantage'. Capital 'A' on After.
Top 100 - capital T on top.

Run it though a spellchecker before you doing anything with it, ams instead of ares, etc.

Look around on the web, try and find some evidence of yuor claims, it is all very well talking about likelihoods and that, but if your teachers are as smug and aouthoritarian as you say they are, then the opinions of a few 16-17 year olds won't change their minds.

Take the (which I'm not) out as well as it sounds too petulant, in fact alter that entire paragraph if you're going to present it to teachers, as there may be a few in there that support your cause and if you come blazing in calliong the school 'astoundingly wrong', then they're just going to look down on you.