This watchdog blog, by journalist Norman Oder, offers analysis, commentary, and reportage about the $4.9 billion project to build the Barclays Center arena and 16 high-rise buildings at a crucial site in Brooklyn. Dubbed Atlantic Yards by developer Forest City Ratner in 2003, it was rebranded Pacific Park in 2014 after the Chinese government-owned Greenland Group bought a 70% stake in 15 towers. New York State still calls it Atlantic Yards. Contact: AtlanticYardsReport[at]hotmail.com

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Would you believe that David Stockman, the author and former White House Budget Director under President Ronald Reagan, has emerged as one of the prime critics of crony capitalism--and another sign that crony capitalism is less about right and left than insiders and outsiders.

DAVID STOCKMAN: Crony capitalism is about the aggressive and proactive use of political resources, lobbying, campaign contributions, influence-peddling of one type or another to gain something from the governmental process that wouldn't otherwise be achievable in the market. And as the time has progressed over the last two or three decades, I think it's gotten much worse. Money dominates politics.
And as a result, we have neither capitalism or democracy. We have some kind of --

BILL MOYERS: What do we have?

DAVID STOCKMAN: We have crony capitalism, which is the worst. It's not a free market. There isn't risk taking in the sense that if you succeed, you keep your rewards, if you fail, you accept the consequences. Look what the bailout was in 2008.
There was clearly reckless, speculative behavior going on for years on Wall Street. And then when the consequence finally came, the Treasury stepped in and the Fed stepped in. Everything was bailed out and the game was restarted. And I think that was a huge mistake.

...BILL MOYERS:
You name names in your writing. You identify several people as the
embodiment of crony capitalism. Tell me about Jeffrey Immelt.

DAVID STOCKMAN:
He is the poster boy for crony capitalism. Here is GE, one of the six
triple-A companies left in the United Sates, a massive, half-trillion
dollar company, massive market capitalization. I'm talking about the eve
of the crisis now, in September, 2008.
Suddenly, when the commercial paper market starts to destabilize and
short-term rates went up. He calls up the Treasury secretary with an
S.O.S., "I'm in trouble here. I need a lifeline." He had recklessly
funded a lot of assets at General Electric Capital in the overnight
commercial paper market. And suddenly needed a bailout from the
Treasury. Within days, that bailout was granted.
And therefore, General Electric was able to avoid the consequence of
its foolish lend long and borrow short policy. What they should have
been required to do when the commercial paper market dried up -- that
was the excuse. They should've been required to offer equity, sell
stock at a highly discounted rate, dilute their shareholders, and raise
the cash they need to pay off their commercial paper.
That would've been the capitalist way. That would've been the free
market way of doing things. And in the future they would've been less
likely to go back into this speculative mode of borrowing short and
lending long. But when we get to the point where the one triple-A, a
multi-hundred billion dollar company gets to call up the secretary,
issue the S.O.S. sign and get $60 billion worth of guaranteed Federal
Reserve and Treasury backup lines, then we are, you know, our system has
been totally transformed. It is not a free market system. It is a
system run by powerful, political and corporate forces.

DAVID STOCKMAN:
Well, I was in the middle of being very disgusted with what my own
Republican Party had done and what Bush had done and the Paulson
Treasury. And then when I saw this, I got the title for my book, “The
Triumph of Crony Capitalism.”

...BILL MOYERS:
Where is the shame? Shouldn't these people have been at least a little
ashamed of running the economy and the financial system into the ditch
and then saying, "Come lift me out?"

DAVID STOCKMAN:
Yes. You know, I think that's part of the problem. I started on Capitol
Hill in 1970s. And as I can vividly recall, corporate leaders then at
least were consistent. They might've complained
about big government, or they might've complained about the tax system.
But there wasn't an entitlement expectation that if financial turmoil
or upheaval came along, that the Treasury, or the Federal Reserve, or
the FDIC or someone would be there to back them up. That would've been
considered, you know, it would've been considered, as you say, shameful.
And somehow, over the last 30 years, the corporate leadership of America
has gotten so addicted to their stock price by the hour, by the day, by
the week, that they're willing to support anything that might keep the
game going and help the system in the short run avoid a hit to their
stock price and to the value of their options. That's the real problem
today. And as a result, there is no real political doctrine ideology
left in the corporate community. They are simply pragmatists who will
take anything they can find, and run with it.

...BILL MOYERS:
No one I know has a better understanding of the see-saw tension in our history between democracy and capitalism.
Capitalism, you accumulate wealth and make it available. Democracy
being a brake, B-R-A-K-E, on the unbridled greed of capitalists. It
seems to me that democracy has lost and that capitalism is triumphant --
crony capitalism in this case.

DAVID STOCKMAN:
And I think it's important to put the word crony capitalism on there.
Because free-market capitalism is a different thing. True free-market
capitalists never go to Washington with their hand out. True
free-market capitalists running a bank do not expect that every time
they make a foolish mistake or they get themselves too leveraged or they
end up with too many risky assets that don't work out, they don't
expect to go to the Federal Reserve and get some cheap or free money and
go on as before.
They expect consequences, maybe even failure of their firm, certainly
loss of their bonuses, maybe the loss of their jobs. So we don't have
free-market capitalism left in this country anymore. We have everyone
believing that if they can hire the right lobbyist, raise enough
political action committee money, spend enough time prowling the halls
of the Senate and the House and the office buildings, arguing for their
parochial narrow interest -- that that is the way that will work out.
And that is crony capitalism. It’s very dangerous and it seems to be
becoming more embedded in our system.

[HIS SOLUTION] Ban corporations from campaign contributions or attempting to
influence elections. Now, I know that runs into current free speech.
So the only way around it is a constitutional amendment to cleanse our
political system on a one-time basis from this enormously corrupting
influence that has built up. And I think nothing is really going to
change until we get money out of politics and do some radical things to
change the way elections are financed and the way the process is
influenced by organized money. If we don’t address that, then crony
capitalism is here for the duration.

...BILL MOYERS:
Since you've been covering capitalism, business and finance what's been the biggest change you've seen?

GRETCHEN MORGENSON:
Previously I believed that bankers that presided over this kind of a
train wreck would have wandered away from the scene, tail between their
legs, ashamed, or the regulators would have cleaned house, fired the
management, clawed back their compensation.
We've seen none of that in 2008. Did the U.S. government replace any
of these managements? No. Did the U.S. government claw back any of
the money that these people made when the boom was going on which we now
all know was a phony boom and so therefore that was phony money that
they earned during those years.
We also didn't have a penalty, there were no penalties paid except by
the innocent taxpayers. There were no penalties paid by the people who
created the crisis.