Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by lupus at ximian.com.http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=80508
--- shadow/80508 2007-01-12 17:13:29.000000000 -0500
+++ shadow/80508.tmp.7257 2007-01-12 18:04:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -25,6 +25,13 @@
I think it is not a regression. I have made this change couple of
months ago after some performance measurements.
See expression.cs and
const int max_automatic_initializers
+
+------- Additional Comments From lupus at ximian.com 2007-01-12 18:04 -------
+It is a bad change. Instead of filing a whishlist bug for the jit to
+optimize this case you cause bloat both in the assembly and in the
+runtime generated code, making the code unoptimizable. Your limit can
+cause 4-5 KB of generated code just to initialize an array. Please
+revert to more sane values, like 10 or 20 instead of 200.