The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society. JFK

Last updated – 19th Nov. 2018WE WISH TO THANK OUR LOYAL SUPPORTERS WORLD WIDE.The pictures hanging in our ‘ROGUES GALLERY’ are only SOME ofthose who promoted artificial water fluoridation in the knowledge that it was an expensive and dangerous fraud.

OUR HALL OF SHAME is NOT comprehensive.The continued promotion of artificial water fluoridation in the faceof mounting adverse evidence and criticism requires some evaluation:

It seems that the proponents hit upon an idea years ago which appealed to them, and which they felt was sound. However, as their claims for safety are progressively discredited, rather than acknowledge this, they persist in condoning the original evidence. At the same time they are still lending their prestige to such equivocation. Certainly the proponents of fluoridation are not intent upon poisoning or harming anyone, however, the dilemma of prestige is still a very difficult matter for them to resolve. Most Doctors are victims of this system too.
The problem with questioning anything at all about fluoridation, is that you’re immediately labeled ‘anti-science’ and a ‘conspirator theorist’, however we are not so easily dismissed. We have science and time on our side. Water fluoridation has run out of credibility and one day will be just a very bad memory…

Rochester Uni. infamous for research at the time of the Manhattan Project secretly injected people with plutonium without their knowledge, – using them as experimental guinea pigs. It still promotes fluoridation – which is also experimental.

A CAREER OF CONCEALING THE TRUTH: The author of the 1944 CNS research proposal wasHarold C. Hodge,chief of fluoride toxicology studies for the University of Rochester’s division of the Manhattan Project.

Edward Bernays” Engineering of Consent ” He was an Austrian-American pioneer in the field of public relations and propaganda, named one of the 100 most influential Americans of the 20th century by Life magazine. He believed in a sort of “Enlightened Despotism” ideology. Bernays also pioneered thePR industry’s use of psychology and other social sciences to design his public persuasion campaigns.He played a key role in selling fluoridation to New Yorkers in the 1960′s.❝ If New Yorkers will accept fluoride, other cities will follow. ❞

And still are !

QUAESTUARY

Dr. Dilip Dhupelia AMA Queensland calls

Sir Richard Doll by (ICFI)Expert for Hire – He lied under oath on fluoridation and cancer. Sir Richard Doll, received millions of dollars in consulting fees from chemical companies, asbestos companies, and other industries whichcreate carcinogenic materials.

Yet in scientific publications, as an expert witness and before government authorities he often defended these chemicals against evidence they caused cancer.

According to the UK based group injurywatch.co.uk in a sidebar entitled – “Sir Richard Doll: The Industry man?” They note: In 1976, in spite of well-documented concerns on the risks of fluoridation of drinking water with industrial wastes, Doll declared that it was “unethical” not to do so.” Thus fluoride may have been the first suspected carcinogen that Doll protected. He defended water fluoridation in $cientific papers, public statements, and courttestimony.
See also → The Case Of Sir Richard Doll.

While addressing the chamber on the benefits of fluoridation, the NSW chief medical officer Dr Kerry Chant was heckled by the gallery packed with anti-fluoride residents and protestors, prompting the Mayor to interject and call for order. “There are no harms proven,” Dr. Chant said as the gallery shouted ‘not true, not true’.You can fool some of the people only some of the time.The peasants are revolting…

.

Former president of the International Association for Dental Research,
University of Rochester Rockefeller Dental Fellow 1930
Dean Tufts University School of Dental Medicine.

Director Eastman Dental Centre 1947-1970. He is credited with demonstrating fluoride would prevent caries.To his credit he researched the use of adhesive plastics for restorative dentistry. HE PROMOTED FLUORIDATION TO NHMRC (Aust.) He is therefore the main link between the US nuclear weapons industry and the Fluoridation of Australia. FLUORIDATION BECAME AN AUSTRALIAN POLICY AT THIS POINT.

Sorry Prof. Wendell Evans we are unimpressed.Modern science is a challenge to you, and history will be unkind to you:

The processing of phosphate fertilizer results in smoke stack emissions of silicofluorides and other contaminants, which are significant environmental pollutants? The US EPA and other governmental agencies require these pollutants to be “scrubbed” from the chimneys to protect the environment, people, flora, fauna, farm animals and crops from damage. However, this unprocessed liquid scrubbing mixture, called hydrofluorosilicic acid, is sold to municipalities as a sauce of fluoride to be added to otherwise clean safe drinking water. — WHO not supportive.

“Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an
individual or a community to articulate their opinions and
ideas without fear of government retaliation,censorship, or sanction…”

Key Knowledge Gaps ↓

“The Fight For fluoridation In Oberon Continues!

ADA NSW Advocacy and Policy Advisor and Specialist Paediatric Dentist Dr Sarah Raphael was interviewed on Ten’s ‘The Project’ last night (Tuesday, 5 June 2018) promoting the safety and effectiveness of water fluoridation for oral health and the prevalence of misinformation online. -Were you referring to us? We hope so. Please give out our web address, we need more readers and they need us.

The sooner you stop promoting fluoridation the healthier Australians will be.

Your sincerity is not being questioned – only your training.

… A study of dentist and dental assistants in the Netherlandsfound 50% higher rates of spontaneous abortions, stillbirths,and congenital defects than for the control group,with unusually high occurrence of spina bifida.

Fluoride promoters are more concerned about saving face than making corrections.History will not forgive them, but those who changed their minds along withwhistleblowers will be viewed as heroes rather than troublemakers.

Water Fluoridation Is Paralogism.

ARTICLE 6 – CONSENT:

1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. This consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice. 21… ❞

An affirmation by Jeannette Young 15 January 2013:“Fluoride is essential for dental health” according to the Chief Health Officer:

“Implementing fluoridisation in water is the most important way local governments can improve the dental health of their communities” according to Queensland’s Chief Health Officer Dr Jeannette Young. The Department of Health has written to every local government in Queensland, offering to meet and discuss the health benefits of fluoridation. Several local governments have taken up the offer and Dr Young is hopeful others will follow. – HOWEVER: -

Recent changes to Queensland’s legislation means local governments now have the decision making power to determine if it is in the best interests of their communities to implement, continue or cease water fluoridation. Dr Young said World Health Organisation studies showed adding fluoride to water supplies was a safe and effective - LD 50 / ED50 way of reducing tooth decay. She said fluoride was not harmful to people’s health, despite the widespread scaremongering on the issue. “In the small amounts that are used in water supplies, fluoride is not harmful,” Dr Young said. “There is no evidence to show fluoride, in the amounts used in water supplies, has any detrimental health effects. “In fact, studies have shown that people with good dental health have better overall health. “Townsville has been using fluoride in its water supplies since 1964 and it has not resulted in any health problems there. “There is no reliable evidence of any adverse health effects to communities which have already implemented fluoride in their water supplies.” Queensland’s Chief Dental Officer Dr Rhys Thomas said fluoride was proven to strengthen teeth and prevent tooth decay. “Ultimately it is up to local authorities to implement and continue fluoridation. But we hope that they are making decisions armed with all the facts,” Dr Thomas said. “Studies have shown that the use of fluoride benefits everyone regardless of their age or access to dental care. “Australian Child Dental Health surveys consistently show that Queensland children have levels of tooth decay well above the national average. https://twitter.com/qldhealthnews or https://www.facebook.com/QLDHealth “ The use of fluoride is one way of turning this around.” Dr Jeannette Young, recently stated words to the effect:

In medicine not many things are BLACK and WHITE,
but waterfluoridation is one of those things .”

Forced-Fluoridation Is Medical Malpractice – On An Industrial Scale.

BOVARISM

He has enough letters after his name to make a good serve of alphabet soup,
however his constant defence of fluoridation casts a shadow over his knowledge,
training, sincerity and ethics.Just following orders didn’t work as a defense
for the Nazis and it shouldn’t work for those who poison our water !

PARALOGISM

Dr. Rachael Dunlop is the Vice-President of the Australian Skeptics Inc.by association supports water fluoridation – not good for her image.The time has come for the “Australian Skeptics”to be skeptical about fluoridation. -Most of the world has!

No army can withstand the strength of an idea whose time has come.- Victor Hugo

A Zealous Fluoridation Promoter

Michael Foley:… Try to avoid debates in public or on the radio or TV in which anti-fluoridationists also appear. Disproving anti-fluoridationists claims takes considerably longer than making claims in the first place, and some degree of doubt from the original claim will often still be left. Simply holding a debate reinforces the perception that both sides have equally valid viewpoints. Don’t give them that respectability… ”

FARRAGINOUS EXPLANATIONS

Queensland Health Water Program Director Dr. Greg Jackson,Brisbane Dental Hospital director, Dr. Michael Foley andTownsville public health physician Dr. Steven Donohue.The three pro-fluoride speakers said ” fluoridewas not a medication or a waste productand that fluoridation was simplyabout topping up the naturallevels of fluoride in water,for optimum dentalhealth.”Extracts from:‘ Science & Survival ‘ by Barry Commoner 1963❝… Like the sorcerer’s apprentice,♦ we are actingupon dangerously incomplete knowledge. We are, in effect,conducting a huge experiment on ourselves. A generation hence-too late to help-public health statistics may reveal whathazards are associated with these pollutants … ❞♦ 1940 Disney film Fantasia

Arsenic also occurs “naturally” in some waters – should we be ‘topping it up’ ?

We hope to see you on This Post one day.Happiness is when what you think,
what you say, and what you do are in harmony – Mahatma Gandhi

“ My goal is to represent and serve the members of our association and continue
building a strong membership and financial base that provides
us with a powerful lobbying platform.”Your push for fluoridation seems to be more of a priority than the health of the State!See someF. info from PubMed

With possible legal implications as per recent declaration by

Rockhampton is the State’s 24th council to get rid of fluoridation.

Anna Bligh Ex-Premier of Queensland Forced Fluoridation
On Four Million Queenslanders Letters sent to her by us and others:→HERE←

ADA / Qld. Labour Party Collusion:

The Queensland Health Department, under Anna Bligh funded The Australian Dental
Association Queensland Branch, $220,000 as a CON-tribution to its pro-fluoridation
campaign.The request for this funding was directed to the Hon. Stephen Robertson MP.
The Minister for Health at the time, – Feb. 2006.

The ‘Brisbane Anti-fluoridation Association’ placed leaflets in
every mailbox in his electorate prior to this state election.A great man with a foolish fluoride policy…

Dr. M. Brown (Chief Dental Officer, Dept. of Health, Queensland),“Fluoridation resulted in reduced tooth decay, with Townsvillechildren having the lowest prevalence of dental rot among all four regions. “

— Previous Australian Federal Health Minister — Tanya Plibersek. — You made it to this gallery not because you were the Minister for Health, but because of your pro- fluoride outburst on ‘Q & A’ (TV) 18 Feb. 2013 (A departure from the calm poise and patience you are noted for.) Tania please have a chat to one of your predecessors .Former Federal Health Minister

In 1979 McBride carried the fluoridation torch for the NSW Health Dept., the AMA, ADA

and the Sydney University Dental Health Education & Research Foundation.

For some inexplicable reason Dr Carnie and other fluoridation promoters appear more intent on
protecting this outdated practice than protecting the health of the Australian people.→We are not amused←
“ Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go.” – Oscar Wilde

“It is one thing to use fluorides on the enemy in times of war, ♦ but it is quite another to use it on your own population after the war is over in the form of fluoridation. Is that what our soldiers went to war and died for?” – Glen Walker –♦ SARIN= Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl-Fluoride (nerve gas)Sarin also known as GB. SOMAN = Picacolyl-Methyl-Phosphonos-Fluoride

“Forced-fluoridation is an act of indiscriminate and ongoing violence againsteveryone who is subjected to it, so Michael Gannon is the worst kind of hypocrite.New forces are at work in WA to rid it of fluoridation.

John Day MLA

DANGEROUS, DYSMORPHIC AND INDEFENSIBLE

Listen ↓

↑ listen

This sound track available AGAIN!Dr. Hambleton is talking to John Laws about fluoridation… He says: Fluoride is safe and has not been shown to cause any of the healthconcerns that people try to ascribe to it.

Editor’s comment: If the AMA can not get this right, it is no surprise that the public is losing confidence in this once prestigious organization… See extract from an e-letter below sent to us from one of our readers after hearing Dr. Hambleton talking to John Laws:

❝ … I was recently forwarded an audio file of a radio interview you did with John Laws in July, [2012] and I am shocked by the misleading, inaccurate and downright untrue statements you made in that interview on the subject of water fluoridation…”

John-Paul Langbrock

.

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS (HANSARD)

“…As a dentist by profession, I want to make this point:
fluoride is not a poison or pesticide. Fluoride is
not a form of mass medication or chemical terrorism.
There is no credible scientific evidence to suggest that
fluoride has any adverse effect on health…”

[ Well it is a relief to have that confirmed! ]

FLAGITIOUS

❝…However, public support for water fluoridation decreases during campaigns involving plebiscites/referendums because of the myriad of tactics and propaganda used by anti-fluoridationists’, which run the gamut of conspiracy theories to scare mongering. One such tactic is to call upon “experts”, some of whom might even have legitimate scientific or academic credentials, to lend credence to their claims, as was in this case. As a result, voters would often choose the safer option of not fluoridating because of the difficulty in sorting fact from fiction or to judge which “authorities” to believe (4,6)…❞

“Ridicule is not a part of the scientific method and the public should not be taught that it is.”
– Dr. A. Hynek

He said all water had some naturally occurring fluoride in it, but most had less than what was regarded as optimal for health.

Chief Executive Officer, Extract From:Submission From The Public Health Association of Australia. On – The Transparency Of The TGA –❝… All complaints about the promotion of therapeutic goods referred to the TGA by [The] Complaint Resolution Committee (CRP), of the Complementary Health Care Council, or handled direct should be made publicly available as should the action taken, the time line and the outcome. The TGA’s ‘new’ policy on complaint investigations only concerns publishing the outcome of ‘certain’ investigations into complaints about advertising which have been referred by the CRP. …

❝ The PHAA believes that ALL complaints referred to the TGA should be dealt with expeditiously and transparently.Alternatively, the CRP should handle all complaints and be given the power to enforce sanctions… ❞ Editor’s note:Well said sir, we can only hope that all complaints about fluoridation receive your PROMPT attention in the near future. This web site and many others can provide you with all the science to show that fluoridation is not “complementary” to human, animal or plant health— therefore please consider this web site as a complaint, and have it dealt with expeditiously… We are all waiting expectantly..!

Dr. Karin Alexander was the previous Federal President of the Australian Dental Association. She spoke on Brisbane Radio 4BC (Feb. 2013) She attempted to put a good spin on fluoridation– no science quoted, but some nonsense e.g.Fluoride is only a mineral supplement-it occurs naturally, and breaks down naturally. [?] And dismissed the interviewer’s concernsabout medicating the community without their permission.“ The ADA continues to be dismayed with the scare mongering from fringe groups…“

The ADA have been repeating triceratillion times the same old fossilised message for 50 + years:

So much cleverness, $kill and $cience, contaminated by commerce.

CRIMINAL ACCOMPLICES:

One who knowingly, voluntarily, and with common intent unites with the principal offender in the commission of a crime. One who is in some way concerned or associated in commission of crime; partaker of guilt; one who aids or assists, or is anAccessory. One who is guilty of complicity in crime charged, either by being present and aiding or abetting in it, or having advised and encouraged it, though absent from place when it was committed, though mere presence, Acquiescence, or silence, in the absence of a duty to act, is not enough, no matter how reprehensible it may be, to constitute one an accomplice. One is liable as an accomplice to the crime of another if he or she gave assistance or encouragement or failed to perform a legal duty to prevent it with the intent thereby to promote or facilitate commission of the crime. Just following orders didn’t work as a defence for the Nazis andit shouldn’t work for those who poison our water supply either!

“This Public Health Service, unfortunately, has locked itself into a position where it has made this statement on the record that there is absolutely no hazard to fluoridating public water supplies and the matter is closed.Now, that, of course, is immedately a unscientific approach.”

- Fluoridation reduces the consumer’s Choice -

Award for ‘Choice’ & ‘Snopes’

Yaakov Litzman“Yaakov Litzman. I don’t care how big his kippah or black his hat (or how much all my fellow charedim insist he is a tzaddik). He wants to undo the one genuinely good thing his predecessor Yael Germain did as health minister,* which is reintroduce the poison fluoride to the water supply.” Fluoridation is his religion - that is why he is on this web post!

Truth, like gold, is to be obtained not by its growth,but by washing away from it all that is not gold. – Leo Tolstoy

Copying and distributing any of this information is encouraged by us in the interest of transparency and accountability. Off-line copies are maintained by us to insure documents are never ‘lost’.

Issues involving lead, mercury, other dangerous chemicals and radioactive isotopes are relative and seriously associated, as they are made more dangerous with added fluorides. Fluorides used for the water supplies, war gases, medications, industrial processes and agriculture need to be understood and recognised.

Those who promote fluoridation will hang their heads in shame as the truth is made more public. History will turn on them. They will be vilified and hated. The citizens will be unforgiving, as their trust has been breached. “The evil that men do lives on after them; the good is oft interred with their bones”Mark Antony-↓
We are therefor pleased to present the links below.↓

If you do not support us it is because you are:Misinformed orUniformed…

” Dr Michael Foley again went quiet when theissue of daily fluoride dosage came up.”

“ Dr Foley would do well to do a little research and read comments made by councillors themselves before he makes public statements about the reason why councillors – after considering both sides of the argument – voted against fluoride in the water,” Cr Strelow said.

“His ill-informed reactionary comments are an example of the type of behaviour which has contributed to this issue being such an emotive one within the broader community. I would have expected better from a man in his position.”

Pro-fluoridationist Dr. Foley is blinded by a diabolical ideology, which does not allow him to draw rational conclusions. (Recent debate Mackay – (Sept. 2016)His ideology is hostile to science, logic and history. His recent claim that fluoride does no harm to the thyroid gland is a typical response when he is out of his depth in fluoridated water. - See below ↓

Iodine is a halogen.
The halogens are a series of non-metal elemants: Fluorine, F Chlorine, Cl Bromine, Br Iodine, I Astatine, At

The problem is that fluoride is a ‘bully‘. Any time an atom of fluorideand an atom of any other halogen are in the same vicinity, thefluoride will displace the other halogen and take its place.- Dr. Terry Tennant, MD, MD(H), PSc.,D

This is universal, probably throughout time and most likely
throughout the cosmos. We realise that dentists will see
this as yet another threat to their constant claims of
fluoridation’s safety, but to claim otherwise
is to fly in the face of true science.

Sorry Mr. Foley, fluorides DO cause delayed
eruption of teeth in animals and humans.See extract below – page 129. If you do not know this basic,we think you should consider dropping your title of doctor.

“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser”.
–Socrates

You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Merilyn Haines is absolutely correct when she says that most Australian doctors know very little about the adverse health effects of fluoride. I have skeletal fluorosis, and am fluoride sensitive, with many symptoms. For years I tried to find a doctor who could help me, but they couldn’t help. Eventually I figured out for myself that the problem was fluoride, mainly from fluoridated water. By that stage I had such severe joint problems that I could barely do the most basic things required to look after myself, and I am not old. Eight years later, most of my symptoms have disappeared or greatly improved, but even though there has been great improvement with my joints my activity is still severely restricted. Skeletal fluorosis can be permanent if it progresses too far. Michael Foley is a shameless hypocrite and liar, who should be in jail. If he wants to see poor quality research, he need only look at that which he and his fellow fluoridationists rely on. If anyone wants more information, they could start with the Fluoride Action Network website, Declan Waugh’s work, the journal Fluoride, and the 2006 US National Research Council report on fluoride in drinking water. There are also some good Australian websites.

If in doubt leave it out! Good on you Merylin Hines, I’m with you 100%. I was always made to believe that cavaties where caused by sugary foods? Let’s ban companys like Coca cola from destroying our communities teeth? But typical of todays model of medicine we deny food and nutrition and run around looking for the next magical elixer to market and sell. I don’t want chemicals added to my water thankyou, yet I am denied this simple human right as long as I live in a flurodated region.

The Australian Constitution is there to limit the powers the re-representatives (not nannies) excise over we the people. We’ve never at Referendum approved of this industrial waste mass medication. I’m a big boy now and my children know how to use a tooth brush. Take that waste product out of the municipal drinking water until such a time as we the people in the majority ask for it via Referendum.

Dr Michael Foley again went quiet when the issue of daily fluoride dosage came up. Thing is, the whole topic should be mute as Dr Michael Foley is not my doctor. ABC, when did it become legal for governments and dentists to force dosages on Australians? Permission has never been given thus why the medical indemnity protection is in place to protect those like Dr Michael Foley. Why do they need protection from something they say is safe? Doctors used to indorse smoking as well. Dr Michael Foley, you are not my doctor. Dr Michael Foley, you are not my nanny. 95% of world agree with me.

I don’t want fluoride in my water – that should be enough!

Why should I have it when I don’t want it and don’t need it – or
is Queensland Health the new unelected dictatorship of Queensland?

No I do not want fluoride in the water…natural water full of healthy minerals, flows constantly beneathe the ground, for us all to drink.

However, if we keep polluting the natural water, via coal seam gas and chemicals, then heaven help us….but then again, maybe it is already helping us, with all the floods that Queensland has recently experienced….maybe these floods are flushing out these toxic chemicals from our water supplies. I guess we humans had better get over and on with the fact, that nature overides nurture, every time, regards.

Well Foley should have asked to provide the study done by the NHMRC and TGA CDC and the FDA ….NONE done and their push to fluoridate is flawed. The enviromental problems:

As for litigation one needs to look back at Germany and damage done 100 rears ago. Approximately 17 million Litres of poison water is released into the environment annually. This run off also effects the Great Barrier Reef via rivers.

*Economically wasteful..

100% water is fluoridated .. 40% lost in leaks before you get it. 40% into the environment where it is not supposed to go of the 60% left 7/8 used by industry and farmers the 1/8 left that comes in to your house you drink less than 1% of it. You water the lawn, flush the toilet, take baths you do all sorts of things
with but you are not drinking it.. Your drinking less than 1% of the 1% and if you look at the number of children with a so called tooth problems it is about 3% of the population. We now have 3% of population drinking of the 3% of 1% of 1/8 of 60% of all the water you bothered to fluoridate, so is this the way to deliver an illegal medication to those who don’t drink the water supply in the first place ???.

It’s pretty rich of Merilyn Haines to say that calling fluoride natural is “misleading”.
I can count a number of times she can be considered misleading;

- “industrial waste”: table salt is always table salt no matter if it’s from a salt lake or urea.

– “600 mg of lead”: that is 0.6% of the fluoride mix. When diluted down to 1 part per million, this lead is 6 parts per billion!- pointing to these trace chemicals is in itself misleading, when the argument is about fluoride. – She focuses on the results of adult tooth decay in children (teeth without much time to have developed tooth decay) as opposed to baby teeth.- She misrepresents the 2007 NSW Dental Health Survey, which concluded far less fluorosis and a noted difference in tooth decay between fluoridated and non-fluoridated regions. – She doesn’t name the study, but previously when she talks about osteosarcoma, she has been referring to Bassin et al (2006). The researchers behind this study couldn’t replicate the appearance of osteosarcoma and stressed caution in drawing the relationship.

Dr Foley did a great job, but it made no difference to her position regardless how often he corrected her.

I’ve been following this fluoridation matter for a few months now and I am amazing by how they interact with the science. For instance the 2007 NSW survey or the Bassin paper; neither support their position and yet, even when this is brought to their attention, they continue to use them as though the papers do.

Wow this is a great debate from ABC regarding Fluoride in drinking water. It provides views from both sides of the argument and clearly highlights the major difference, one side is based on ideology, the other on research and facts.

If you have any doubts or questions regarding the Fluoride debate, take the time and listen.

It is really worth it.

Marilyn Haines, made very valid points. Take fluoride out of the water supply. The best way is to prevent tooth decay is to apply it directly to the teeth. Michael Foley tried to discredit her but what he did not say that no amount of water will save baby teeth from the affect of dinking sugar laden juice etc. and being too young to clean their teeth before they go to sleep.

Fluorosis is caused by an intake of too much fluoride over a period of time, from a various of sources including tap water. Duhh?? Great debate Merilyn Haines… Too bad I couldn’t listen to it all, it was cut and inaccessible just after you mentioned your sister.. Shame.

Dr Michael Foley is just another classic example of why we, as a Nation, are in such a poor state of Health ..

What a great debate.

Foley is yet another blind, myopic, ignorant and myopic ego bound “professional” who as a dentist would use DISTILLED WATER to clean his dental equipment (search [ autoclave ].

In hearing this recording, now many times, I personally can see at least 20 mistakes that Foley makes. He would not debate me as he would lose. I would really like to see a record of where Dr. Foley has received his income over time, if or not he has accepted directly or indirectly any payments, inducements or ‘favors’ in any form from any associated with the HUGE fluoride proponents. This is simple:
Do not fluoridate drinking water – let people decide. This arrogance of nanny state forced medication is a simple debate.