We could of freaking had Drummond here if it wasn't for this doofus. No competent, even bottom tier GM would make their pick based on Nash. Just a failure. This is embarrassing for BC.

Us picking Ross over Drummond was actually received pretty well. Drummond has issues. Which is why he fell so low. He dropped like a stone after being talked about as the possible #1 pick not that long ago.

Us picking Ross over Drummond was actually received pretty well. Drummond has issues. Which is why he fell so low. He dropped like a stone after being talked about as the possible #1 pick not that long ago.

When your a bottom tier team in the league, I'm sorry you don't have the luxury for drafting based on needs and fit. You draft best talent available. 0 excuses.

wait, so you are saying ross, bayless and ed for lowry? now that is way too much

Is it now? They have a similar player to ED in Patterson already. Ross was projected to be drafted 12th or later (Houston had the 12th pick by the way). Houston will need a PG in some form/capacity as they'll deal their PG who is solid overall and Goran is a UFA. Let's put this into perspective, houston got the 18th pick for Budinger, who is a prospect that is on a similar level to ED. Lowry, much like Bargs early in the season, was looking like an all star.

Is it now? They have a similar player to ED in Patterson already. Ross was projected to be drafted 12th or later (Houston had the 12th pick by the way). Houston will need a PG in some form/capacity as they'll deal their PG who is solid overall and Goran is a UFA. Let's put this into perspective, houston got the 18th pick for Budinger, who is a prospect that is on a similar level to ED. Lowry, much like Bargs early in the season, was looking like an all star.

personally I would rather give a top 3 protected pick for next year, that all those assets that we have. If they have so many PF what is the point of trading them Ed as well then? might as well make it JJ and Bayless and a second rounder or something

ED has more value though than JJ. JJ + JB + 2nd rounder for Lowry? Are you a Lakers or Knicks fan?

Also, from another board I'm on:

"Worst of all is that good chunk of our insecure and stupid fanbase will likely boo Nash and disown him if he doesn't sign with us. Like he owed something. He's done enough and is still the GM of our national team. He's still a smart guy, and understands that being Canadian isn't very relevant at all to wins, especially with our flawed roster. "

ED has more value though than JJ. JJ + JB + 2nd rounder for Lowry? Are you a Lakers or Knicks fan?

Also, from another board I'm on:

"Worst of all is that good chunk of our insecure and stupid fanbase will likely boo Nash and disown him if he doesn't sign with us. Like he owed something. He's done enough and is still the GM of our national team. He's still a smart guy, and understands that being Canadian isn't very relevant at all to wins, especially with our flawed roster. "

alright then make it ed and and JB, or w.e it is, or make it a future first, I would prefer if we jstu did a top 3 protected first for lowry, throw in a player, on of ed, jj, or jb if needed. I am confident we will make playoffs next year, so the pick wont be worth as much. And to me nash never really made a difference, if he signed, great, if he didnt it didnt realy matter