"RIP Osama Bin Laden. He might have had some bad ideas but he fought the soviets in the 80s. A war hero is still a war hero even if we disagree on some things"

"Death camp survivor fears Holocaust deniers are winning". Cartoon. "Is Israel’s Hidden Hand behind the Attacks on Jeremy Corbyn?" (Cook) (note the details on the Israeli PR scheme using its custom-drafted definition of 'anti-Semitism', which assumes, correctly, that the goyim are simply too stupid to see the trap). "Soros’ Role in Social Media Censorship Revealed in Leaked Document" (Davis) (Brock, Media Matters, Soros, and the entire de-platforming conspiracy set out). "Google shuts down YouTube channels in expansion of state-directed online censorship" (Reed). "The trust deficit tearing apart our societies" (Cook, very philosophical, on the big picture).

My eyes are failing, so when I saw the illustration on this article I thought they had her dressed as Pocahontas: "Warren’s New Goal: Actually Draining the Swamp" (Wexler). Contrast: "The Limits of Elizabeth Warren" (Husseini):

"What
are Warren’s real goals? If she really wants to enact legislation to
rein in corporations, why hasn’t she found a rogue Republican to work
with? Questioned at the press conference by a New York Post reporter, Warren couldn’t name a single Republican she could pair with.

If
her intent is to become the leading contender for the Democratic
nomination will she simply play the sheepdog role of keeping the public
on the “reservation” on behalf of the party’s elite?

“Inside
Washington, some of these proposals will be very unpopular, even with
some of my friends,” Warren said at the Press Club. “Outside Washington,
I expect that most people will see these ideas as no-brainers and be
shocked they’re not already the law.”

The
public would probably also be shocked to learn that funding perpetual
war, unauthorized by either Congress or the U.N., is already against the
law."

I certainly don't think the Israelis are 'out of the game'!!!: "The White Helmets are saddling up for another ride" (Lang). "‘Foreign specialists’ may stage chemical attack in Syria in 2 days to frame Assad: Russian MoD". "Trump and Corbyn" (Shamir) (containing the first righteous comments I've read about the sentimental ultra-Zionist Avnery):

"But why should we give a damn about Corbyn and/or Palestinians if we aren’t British voters? I’ll tell you.

In
the British establishment, pro-Jewish forces decided to side with the
Washington War Party to push us close to war. The recent visit of the
British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt (the man on the shortlist of Israel’s agents
within the British establishment) to Washington where Hunt delivered a
speech calling for full-out war on Russia, “has been read as an
intervention on the side of the anti-Russian faction in the split and
divided US administration”, said the Guardian.

The
speech is just an opening, missiles will follow soon. Today, I was
informed by my contacts, the Russians have delivered a demarche to the
State Department, warning the Americans to desist from their plans to
attack Syria. Russian intelligence learned that eight tanks containing
chlorine have been delivered to Halluz village of Idlib province where
the group of specially trained militants has already been deployed in
order to simulate the rescue of the victims of chemical attack. The
militants were trained by the British private military company Olive
(which had merged with the American Constellis Group.

The
operation, the Russians say, had been planned by the British
intelligence services to justify an impending airstrike directed against
Syrian military and civil infrastructure. For this strike, USS The
Sullivans guided missile destroyer with 56 cruise missiles onboard
arrived to the Persian Gulf, and the US Air Force bomber B-1B with 24
cruise Air-to-Surface Missiles had been flown to the Al-Udeid air base
in Qatar.

The
idea is Israeli, the operational plans are British, weapons and vessels
are American, and a possibility for confrontation grows stronger each
day. The success of Corbyn would put a stop to these plans of war. But
will he have a chance?

Ron Unz wrote
that the British establishment together with Organised Jewry were able
to push unwilling America into the world wars twice, and perhaps they
will be able to repeat this feat a third time. It seems that the
Question of Palestine, one of the reasons for America’s entry into the
world wars, is likely to unleash another war.

Who
is the master and who is the slave of the two, Organised Jewry or
English establishment? This is the-chicken-and-the-egg dilemma, and
there are conflicting answers."

"Back
in those late Cold War days, the death toll of innocent civilians from
the Bolshevik Revolution and the first two decades of the Soviet Regime
was generally reckoned at running well into the tens of millions when we
include the casualties of the Russian Civil War, the government-induced
famines, the Gulag, and the executions. I’ve heard that these numbers
have been substantially revised downwards to perhaps as little as twenty
million or so, but no matter. Although determined Soviet apologists
may dispute such very large figures, they have always been part of the
standard narrative history taught within the West.

Meanwhile,
all historians know perfectly well that the Bolshevik leaders were
overwhelmingly Jewish, with three of the five revolutionaries Lenin
named as his plausible successors coming from that background. Although
only around 4% of Russia’s population was Jewish, a few years ago
Vladimir Putin stated that Jews constituted perhaps 80-85% of the early Soviet government, an estimate fully consistent with the contemporaneous claims of Winston Churchill, Times of London correspondent Robert Wilton, and the officers of American Military Intelligence. Recent books by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Yuri Slezkine, and others
have all painted a very similar picture. And prior to World War II,
Jews remained enormously over-represented in the Communist leadership,
especially dominating the Gulag administration and the top ranks of the
dreaded NKVD.

Both
of these simple facts have been widely accepted in America throughout
my entire lifetime. But combine them together with the relatively tiny
size of worldwide Jewry, around 16 million prior to World War II, and
the inescapable conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were the
greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century, holding that
unfortunate distinction by an enormous margin and with no other
nationality coming even remotely close. And yet, by the astonishing
alchemy of Hollywood, the greatest killers of the last one hundred years
have somehow been transmuted into being seen as the greatest victims, a
transformation so seemingly implausible that future generations will
surely be left gasping in awe.

Today’s
American Neocons are just as heavily Jewish as were the Bolsheviks of a
hundred years ago, and they have greatly benefited from the political
immunity provided by this totally bizarre inversion of historical
reality. Partly as a consequence of their media-fabricated victimhood
status, they have managed to seize control over much of our political
system, especially our foreign policy, and have spent the last few years
doing their utmost to foment an absolutely insane war with
nuclear-armed Russia. If they do manage to achieve that unfortunate
goal, they will surely outdo the very impressive human body-count racked
up by their ethnic ancestors, perhaps even by an order-of-magnitude or
more."

"After The Failed Attempt at Syrian Regime Change, The Next Target is Hezbollah" (Magnier). The kleptomaniac Khazar need to steal that Lebanese water has never gone away.

"RIP Osama Bin Laden. He might have had some bad ideas but he fought the soviets in the 80s. A war hero is still a war hero even if we disagree on some things"

"Death camp survivor fears Holocaust deniers are winning". Cartoon. "Is Israel’s Hidden Hand behind the Attacks on Jeremy Corbyn?" (Cook) (note the details on the Israeli PR scheme using its custom-drafted definition of 'anti-Semitism', which assumes, correctly, that the goyim are simply too stupid to see the trap). "Soros’ Role in Social Media Censorship Revealed in Leaked Document" (Davis) (Brock, Media Matters, Soros, and the entire de-platforming conspiracy set out). "Google shuts down YouTube channels in expansion of state-directed online censorship" (Reed). "The trust deficit tearing apart our societies" (Cook, very philosophical, on the big picture).

My eyes are failing, so when I saw the illustration on this article I thought they had her dressed as Pocahontas: "Warren’s New Goal: Actually Draining the Swamp" (Wexler). Contrast: "The Limits of Elizabeth Warren" (Husseini):

"What
are Warren’s real goals? If she really wants to enact legislation to
rein in corporations, why hasn’t she found a rogue Republican to work
with? Questioned at the press conference by a New York Post reporter, Warren couldn’t name a single Republican she could pair with.

If
her intent is to become the leading contender for the Democratic
nomination will she simply play the sheepdog role of keeping the public
on the “reservation” on behalf of the party’s elite?

“Inside
Washington, some of these proposals will be very unpopular, even with
some of my friends,” Warren said at the Press Club. “Outside Washington,
I expect that most people will see these ideas as no-brainers and be
shocked they’re not already the law.”

The
public would probably also be shocked to learn that funding perpetual
war, unauthorized by either Congress or the U.N., is already against the
law."

I certainly don't think the Israelis are 'out of the game'!!!: "The White Helmets are saddling up for another ride" (Lang). "‘Foreign specialists’ may stage chemical attack in Syria in 2 days to frame Assad: Russian MoD". "Trump and Corbyn" (Shamir) (containing the first righteous comments I've read about the sentimental ultra-Zionist Avnery):

"But why should we give a damn about Corbyn and/or Palestinians if we aren’t British voters? I’ll tell you.

In
the British establishment, pro-Jewish forces decided to side with the
Washington War Party to push us close to war. The recent visit of the
British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt (the man on the shortlist of Israel’s agents
within the British establishment) to Washington where Hunt delivered a
speech calling for full-out war on Russia, “has been read as an
intervention on the side of the anti-Russian faction in the split and
divided US administration”, said the Guardian.

The
speech is just an opening, missiles will follow soon. Today, I was
informed by my contacts, the Russians have delivered a demarche to the
State Department, warning the Americans to desist from their plans to
attack Syria. Russian intelligence learned that eight tanks containing
chlorine have been delivered to Halluz village of Idlib province where
the group of specially trained militants has already been deployed in
order to simulate the rescue of the victims of chemical attack. The
militants were trained by the British private military company Olive
(which had merged with the American Constellis Group.

The
operation, the Russians say, had been planned by the British
intelligence services to justify an impending airstrike directed against
Syrian military and civil infrastructure. For this strike, USS The
Sullivans guided missile destroyer with 56 cruise missiles onboard
arrived to the Persian Gulf, and the US Air Force bomber B-1B with 24
cruise Air-to-Surface Missiles had been flown to the Al-Udeid air base
in Qatar.

The
idea is Israeli, the operational plans are British, weapons and vessels
are American, and a possibility for confrontation grows stronger each
day. The success of Corbyn would put a stop to these plans of war. But
will he have a chance?

Ron Unz wrote
that the British establishment together with Organised Jewry were able
to push unwilling America into the world wars twice, and perhaps they
will be able to repeat this feat a third time. It seems that the
Question of Palestine, one of the reasons for America’s entry into the
world wars, is likely to unleash another war.

Who
is the master and who is the slave of the two, Organised Jewry or
English establishment? This is the-chicken-and-the-egg dilemma, and
there are conflicting answers."

"Back
in those late Cold War days, the death toll of innocent civilians from
the Bolshevik Revolution and the first two decades of the Soviet Regime
was generally reckoned at running well into the tens of millions when we
include the casualties of the Russian Civil War, the government-induced
famines, the Gulag, and the executions. I’ve heard that these numbers
have been substantially revised downwards to perhaps as little as twenty
million or so, but no matter. Although determined Soviet apologists
may dispute such very large figures, they have always been part of the
standard narrative history taught within the West.

Meanwhile,
all historians know perfectly well that the Bolshevik leaders were
overwhelmingly Jewish, with three of the five revolutionaries Lenin
named as his plausible successors coming from that background. Although
only around 4% of Russia’s population was Jewish, a few years ago
Vladimir Putin stated that Jews constituted perhaps 80-85% of the early Soviet government, an estimate fully consistent with the contemporaneous claims of Winston Churchill, Times of London correspondent Robert Wilton, and the officers of American Military Intelligence. Recent books by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Yuri Slezkine, and others
have all painted a very similar picture. And prior to World War II,
Jews remained enormously over-represented in the Communist leadership,
especially dominating the Gulag administration and the top ranks of the
dreaded NKVD.

Both
of these simple facts have been widely accepted in America throughout
my entire lifetime. But combine them together with the relatively tiny
size of worldwide Jewry, around 16 million prior to World War II, and
the inescapable conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were the
greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century, holding that
unfortunate distinction by an enormous margin and with no other
nationality coming even remotely close. And yet, by the astonishing
alchemy of Hollywood, the greatest killers of the last one hundred years
have somehow been transmuted into being seen as the greatest victims, a
transformation so seemingly implausible that future generations will
surely be left gasping in awe.

Today’s
American Neocons are just as heavily Jewish as were the Bolsheviks of a
hundred years ago, and they have greatly benefited from the political
immunity provided by this totally bizarre inversion of historical
reality. Partly as a consequence of their media-fabricated victimhood
status, they have managed to seize control over much of our political
system, especially our foreign policy, and have spent the last few years
doing their utmost to foment an absolutely insane war with
nuclear-armed Russia. If they do manage to achieve that unfortunate
goal, they will surely outdo the very impressive human body-count racked
up by their ethnic ancestors, perhaps even by an order-of-magnitude or
more."

"After The Failed Attempt at Syrian Regime Change, The Next Target is Hezbollah" (Magnier). The kleptomaniac Khazar need to steal that Lebanese water has never gone away.