A Kentucky teenager frustrated by light punishment for two boys who pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting her was spared Monday from having to face a contempt charge for naming them on Twitter in violation of a court order.

"He said the purpose of the motion had been to enforce the law that protects juveniles and their actions from disclosure."

Subject of a different discussion, but it is the offenders who are protected and future potential victims who are denied disclosure. Something seems backwards there. Justice prevailed because they didn't follow the law.

Actually the matter seems reasonably well handled to me. There are reasonable reasons for the non-disclosure of juvenile names but in this case justice would not have been served if punishment had been meted out. The rules SHOULD have some flex in their application.

My girlfriend is 5'1" and slender. We have the devil's own time finding concealed carry methods that work for her. Most standard belt holsters, either IWB or OWB, would have her arm almost in a chicken wing position. What she has had good results with is going for a more formal appearance and wearing a shoulder holster beneath a blazer as part of a pantsuit ensemble.