We’ve no new Witcher 3 videos of late, but if you scroll through these really, really quickly, it’ll be just like watching a low frame rate, abysmally edited video. Make some sword-swooshing noises as you do it, for added effect. The genesis and/or novelty of these 65 1080p screenshots of CDP’s next massive roleplaying game is somewhat indeterminate at present, but I’m sure a good number of them will be fresh to your eyes. PCs with low memory should perhaps be wary of this doubtless RAM-hungry post.
Click on any screen to get a biggun. Unfortunately our image gallery navigation icons are borked at present, but if you either click on the left/right of an embiggened image or use cursor keys, you can browse through the full-size gallery at your leisure. Image quality varies somewhat, but you get the picture – this does appear to be a rather splendid-looking videogame.

And, since you ask, no we do not have an automated image gallery system, so yes, I entered 130 URLs by hand and yes, it was astonishingly tedious. But results are what matter, right?

my neighbor’s sister-in-law makes $65 every hour on the internet. She has been out of a job for six months but last month her payment was $12175 just working on the internet for a few hours. important link
-=-=-=-=-=-=-= http://goo.gl/G40gh3

Some of it was current gen tech, but Witcher 2’s taverns had more life on 360. Bethesda’s ancient and always terrible engine should take the majority of the blame. They couldn’t animate one person properly or dynamically, never mind a room of them.

Purportedly, it’s not actually that much of a ginormous step up from Witcher 2 on max video settings, which isn’t too surprising given that Witcher 2 is a ridiculously pretty game. Funny how game reviews on most sites very rarely talk about game visuals anymore, even when they’re an obvious stand out.

To be honest I just see better lighting and more details: an indicative of them implementing DX11, which is to be expected. There is very little one can do do look better than Witcher 2. It’s still the best looking game of all time and that’s including DX11 games like Crysis 3. Star Citizen looks like it aims to raise the plank a little bit by introducing high-poly models into real time rendering, which sounds interesting, but being a rich and lush Open World game, I doubt Witcher 3 can afford to dramatically increase polycounts.

Please be better than the unfinished mess The Witcher 2 was… At least let the core gameplay be good this time and the dialogues less obnoxious and badly acted and the first half of the game being more than an extended tutorial and, basically please let it be something more than a hyped disappointment…

What’s up with Geralt’s armor? He looks out of place like a cartoon super hero brought to real life in medieval spandex. I prefer the clothing of the NPCs in the screenshots, hopefully the rest differ.

Not essential maybe but definitely worth your time if you like a good yarn of an RPG. Though it’s worth mentioning how rough and slightly dated it is compared with The Witcher 2. As a sequel, it was an unbelievable leap in quality.

Both games have bad combat (and other) mechanics, though I’d say 2’s is clumsier. In that way the first is point and clicky, the second like a badly done unresponsive parody of games like Dark Souls. Worse combat than Skyrim, seriously, just with fancier animations. The world building and pacing is way better in the first game even with the more dated visuals. Most people seem to prefer 2 because it most resembles a straight console action game (with a few binary path choices here and there), even if it’s nowhere near as good as the best of those. Pick your poison I guess, and hope 3 is vastly improved in every way.

Up to you. If you’re a fan of nostalgia, and you don’t mind a massive downgrade in graphics/controls, then it’s a good idea as there are lots of interesting chunks of plot that make some parts of the Witcher 2 make just a little bit more sense. However, it’s not necessary as most of the Witcher 2’s main plot is entirely standalone and shows barely any links to the first game.