On information and belief, Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction

21

in the Central District

of

California (the District ), consistent with the

22

principles

of

due process and the California Long Arm Statute, because

23

Defendants offer their products for sale in this District, have transacted 24 business in this District, have committed and/or induced acts

of

patent

25

infringement in this District, and/or have placed infringing products into

26

JAT

WHEELS

INC. S COMPLAINT

2

1 the stream

of

commerce through established distribution channels with the 2 expectation that such products will be purchased by residents

of

this 3 District. 4

5

Further, this Court has jurisdiction over

laintiffs

California state 5 statutory and common law claims pursuant to

28

U.S.C. § 1367. 6

6

Supplemental jurisdiction exists over Defendant because on information 7 and belief, Defendant conducts business in California and in this judicial 8 district, has purposefully availed itself to California and in this judicial 9 district, or has otherwise availed itself

of

the privileges and protections

of

10

the law

of

the State

of

California, such that this Court's assertion

of

11

jurisdiction over Defendant does not offend traditional notions

of

fair play

12

and due process.

13

7

Venue is proper within the Central District

of

California pursuant to

28 14

U.S.C.

§§

1391(b) and 1400(a) because on information and belief, a

15

substantial part

of

the events or omissions giving rise to the claim

16

occurred in this judicial district, and has caused damages to Plaintiff in