Alaska Chamber: “Public Won’t Support New Taxes”

The Alaska Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) sent out a press release this afternoon updating their position on the state fiscal crisis. Such releases from interest groups usually have the feel of naked self interest. This one is no different.

The Chamber wants to avoid costs to their members in the form of new taxes on business to pay for state government at the expense of state employees.

Curtis Thayer

Just because the positions of such groups are self interested doesn’t mean all their arguments are without merit.

This offering attributed to Chamber President and CEO Curtis Thayer is a powerful statement likely to resonate with lawmakers and voters alike:

“The public won’t support a host of new taxes,” Thayer said. “Not while the State is handing out double digit raises. How can they when their friends and family members are losing their jobs?”

Here is the Chamber’s full press release:

Alaska Chamber reinforces position on achieving sustainable state government

(Anchorage, AK) — On Friday, April 15, the Alaska Chamber spoke in opposition to House Bill 249; an omnibus bill proposing steep increases to taxes on motor fuel and the fishing and mining industries. The Chamber supports reductions to Unrestricted General Fund Spending to $4.5 billion, and Alaskan companies from Ketchikan to Barrow insist that spending be brought in line before the State burdens industry with new taxes.

Testifying in opposition to House Bill 249, Chamber President and CEO Curtis W. Thayer brought the Finance Committee’s focus back to sustainable State spending.

Thayer said, “House Finance held a hearing back in March where representatives expressed serious concern about the overwhelming size of automatic pay increases for public employees while Alaska companies are rapidly constricting.”

Public employee contracts promise pay increases ranging from 3.25 to 10.5 percent for 12,000 State employees. Thayer said, “They’re trying to fill a $4 billion dollar budget gap by hammering fishing and mining with $49 million in new taxes. Meanwhile, another $70 million in pay raises just widens the gap.”

Building a sustainable state government is a responsibility that must be shared by all Alaskans; public and private. Alaska’s principal industry has already lost more than 3,000 jobs this year. Juneau’s singular focus on increasing taxes is indicative of a continued unwillingness to participate in creating a government Alaska can afford.

Copies of Chamber testimony and advocacy positions are available online at alaskachamber.com. The Chamber believes spending must be brought in line while Alaska’s savings are still available as a resource. To that end, we support efforts to:

Reduce the State’s operating budget to a sustainable level;

Create an endowment model or similar framework to use Permanent Fund earnings to support essential services; and

Only then explore introductions of new, broad-based taxes, if needed. It is inappropriate for the State to burden a receding private sector with the yoke of spiraling public spending. Union contracts — like all State programs and services — should be subject to the full review and scrutiny of the public process.

Thayer said. “Not while the State is handing out double digit raises. How can they when their friends and family members are losing their jobs?

3 Commentson "Alaska Chamber: “Public Won’t Support New Taxes”"

” Juneauâ€™s singular focus on increasing taxes is indicative of a continued unwillingness to participate in creating a government Alaska can afford.”…..

That there pretty well sums it all up.
Our government thinks we’re under-taxed, while those of us out here in the real world believe our government is spending too much.
Government should shrink when revenues and the economy are on a downward trend, instead of continuing to grow and punishing with more taxes, those of us in the real world who are already struggling to earn enough to just get by.

The State Chamber of Commerce is being lead by the nose by political operatives dedicated to making a living from within the current paradigm. These Chamber leaders might testify at a bill hearing; however, that is of little consequence because they have the means to purchase the fate of legislation. “Sustained budget”? To the State Chamber that includes funding a maximum PFD that routes money to the members of the Chamber, that includes massive capital spending which routes money to the members of the Chamber, that includes State operational contracts which routes money to the members of the Chamber, and any other expenditure that routes money to the members. That is all the Chamber stands for is big state spending that gives an advantage for the members – and Alaskans be damned. The Legislators pine for these “contributions” from the State Chamber of Commerce. I used to feel self conscious about ordering from Amazon, not any longer……..

The public? The public with whom I speak say no raid on the Permanent Fund and dividends. Not as long as th State is handing out a nine digit, $700,000,000 credit to oil companies from the public treasury every year. How can they when their friends and family members are losing their jobs?