Are 50 BMG rifles considered Registered Assault Weapons, or some other class?

If 50 BMG is just another attribute that makes a RAW it would seem that if you already had a registered assault weapon in 2000 that nothing changes if you add a 50 BMG upper. Which is what I think Sniper3142 is getting at.

To keep it as simple as possible I'm only asking about RAWs from 2000, not the new round of registration.

Your understanding of the law has clout to it( not being a smart *** at all here by the way).A simply nope just leaves questions. My logic and I know logic and doj don't go hand in hand is that if previously RAW's are able to run 50's on them then the new ones should be able to also. A RAW is a RAW. If the 50 ban is in fact it's own registration then neither 2000 or 2017 RAW's should be able run 50's.

The only way I can see doj serving up a big bowl of dicks to the 2017 registers is that ban happened after the 50 ban and that will be their dumb *** reasoning.