Do you think the agreement reached with Iran over its nuclear program is appropriate?

Comments

bobcrane

IF YOU THINK FOR A SECOND they will not be workin on a NUKE you are a FOOL................they have lied to us for 25 years.......go ahead a release the BILLIONS of $$$$$$......this just shows how STUPID (OBAMA) IS .....he said it himself..........and YES I think he is STUPID........period. YOU CAN START THE IMPEACHMENT process NOW if you want.....i will not be a sheddin a tear there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(:)(:)

TiredOfTax

I do believe that the US government is misguided in this quest for an agreement. The Obama administration is hard pressed to get agreement from anyone on any topic at all. But this one is not going to help anything at all, it weakens the US and the worlds resolve and is a morale booster to Iran. A lose lose situation.

FedUp0416

This is what you get when you send a Community Organizer to do a Commander in Chief's job. The agreement does nothing for anyone but the Iranians. At least it took attention away from the Obamacare lies and faliures, Benhazi Cover Up, IRS targeting, AP spying, James Rosen spying, NSA tracking and spying, Fast and Furious gun running scandals. What a wonderful president we have. The only thing to be thankful this holiday season is that we are one year closer to getting rid of another Jimmy Carter.

SashaTia

Fed Up is absolutely correct, and That was the whole idea, take attention away from the Obama Care debacale. What will the next "trick" or I didn't know, they never told me I was not informed be. Must be "nice"? to have all those staffers and policy people who don't have a clue.

Insane

The agreement does not stop the inspectors. If Iran renigs then the sactions can be put back into place. I don't trust them as far as I can throw them but we must start someplace and this is good place to start. So put it in place and we need to be ready if it doesn't work. But to do nothing will get us just that nothing.

laker88

Yes Bob, I've thought about that also, but Neville was so mistakenly confident he didn't even have any back up plan...I think he trusted the Germans far more than we trust Iran. I guess everyone has to decide if we should try the diplomatic route first, or is it too much of a gamble? I lean toward trying it, while monitoring the whole thing with watchful eyes. And off topic, Happy Thanksgiving to you and all posters on this site.

MrBoB51

Yes, we should keep one eye on this and one eye on Isreal, the canary in the coal mine. Iran is Isreals biggest threat and there is no uncertainty in their thinking, no agreements the US or other Countries may have with Iran will stop them from dealing with Iran as they see fit.

MrBoB51

While we may want peace, the cult of islam demands submission. Saudi's want submission from those pesky Iranian mullahs, Iran wants the US to submit to their 'rights' and on and on...everybody in that sandbox is at each others throats to submit to something or other. What we have negotiating for America is an effete representation of the European propensity of bowing before any barbarian that comes over the hill. We need leaders and hero's not limp biscuits like Kerry.

ktjrws

Hey Laker 88, you say Liveshot Kerry was respected in the Senate. Please he was laughed at for being such a pompous a--. The only thing he has ever been a success at is marrying someone else's money. Hence his nickname "The Gigilo'. And while Bush and company were awful if Thurston Howell Kerry had been elected the only positive would be that the current President would not have been elected.

ktjrws

One more thing laker 88. I remember when he was running for Pesident. He did a photo op at a Wendy's took the food on the bus and 3 miles away stopped to pick up dinner at an expensive French joint. A complete fraud through and through. Oh yes and 'John Edwards". Real smart decision there.