Anytime you have the nutcase George Carlin speaking about religion, you have an extremely offensive piece of work. The third segment about the Federal Reserve is the only part worth considering, and it has been better done in other presentations.

Anytime you have the nutcase George Carlin speaking about religion, you have an extremely offensive piece of work. The third segment about the Federal Reserve is the only part worth considering, and it has been better done in other presentations.

Why is George Carlin a nutcase? It’s you that believe in skydady, not him.

Why is George Carlin a nutcase? It’s you that believe in skydady, not him.

I could live without the personal attack language calling him nutcase. That is difficult to prove unless we are talking about Brittney Spears or something. However, that language does seem to draw a reaction.

Let's just leave it on the point that "When George Carlin speaks about religion, it is extremely offensive." This zeitgeist thing loses a potential audience by being so offensive to those who might otherwise accept some of it.

I could live without the personal attack language calling him nutcase. That is difficult to prove unless we are talking about Brittney Spears or something. However, that language does seem to draw a reaction.

Let's just leave it on the point that "When George Carlin speaks about religion, it is extremely offensive." This zeitgeist thing loses a potential audience by being so offensive to those who might otherwise accept some of it.

It's been awhile since I watched it (several months ago). The first segment was very objectionable, especially when Carlin spoke. The 2nd and 3rd segments were more like typical conspiracy theory stuff. Entertaining, but not believable in the conclusions they try to draw the audience to believe. The third segment is really the only part that goes beyond a curiosity.

It's been awhile since I watched it (several months ago). The first segment was very objectionable, especially when Carlin spoke. The 2nd and 3rd segments were more like typical conspiracy theory stuff. Entertaining, but not believable in the conclusions they try to draw the audience to believe. The third segment is really the only part that goes beyond a curiosity.

there we go an answer.. thank you, the religion part bothers you.. i can see why
but do you ever wonder... just maybe that there is something else going on? i was born and raised in the catholic church been confirmed, first communion all that stuff... i just need more proof i gues but thats just IMO

Religious are used to NOT being questioned and mocked. Being a person of faith somehow gets you a free pass. I call BS.

We live in a physical, real world governed by the laws of the Universe that are best explained by science.

We record videos on our cell phones and sip champagne 8 miles above earth going twice the speed of sound.

Religious fundamentalist like scotty are offended when being mocked because deep down they know how bizarre their claim is. When debating a religious person I will eventually get a response that goes like this:

“You can call me stupid all you want, but you’ll have to answer to a higher power, and I’ll prey for your soul.”

I NEVER called anyone stupid. Well, maybe I have, but certainly not for being religious.

They feel stupid because they are indoctrinated to defend a ridiculous, morally outdated, cruel, make believe, fairy tale!!!

there we go an answer.. thank you, the religion part bothers you.. i can see why
but do you ever wonder... just maybe that there is something else going on? i was born and raised in the catholic church been confirmed, first communion all that stuff... i just need more proof i gues but thats just IMO

People like you deserve great admiration for overcoming childhood indoctrination.

It is not easy to give up something you hold dear in order to face the truth. Many scientists have fallen victim to this. Nursing their pet projects into bizarre-world, despite the contrary evidence.