thanks for the explanation, I'll have a look at it! :)
all the best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>> Does weaver enhances the class bytecode or even generate classes?
>
> You could do both. Currently the only 'plugin' for the weaver is Matts privilizer. This
one only 'enhances' an existing class. But there is no further restriction and I see no reason
why you could not generate classes. But please note that this classes are only available _after_
the compilation. So they cannot (sanely) be referenced by any java source code.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org>
>> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 1:16 PM
>> Subject: Re: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module
>>
>> Hi Mark!
>>
>> until v3.2 the Digester supported runtime annotations to generate the
>> XML parser - the idea was having a processor that generates the XML
>> parser at compile-time, but unfortunately I haven't had enough time to
>> continue working on it...
>> So, since it is even broken and still at the early stage, I propose to
>> drop it to cut soon a new release, and postpone it to new versions.
>>
>> Does weaver enhances the class bytecode or even generate classes?
>>
>> TIA,
>> -Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>> I have no clue what the annotation processing is for, but might that be a
>> candidate for the upcoming commons-weaver (formerly privilizer) ?
>>> It takes CLASS/RUNTIME annotations a modifies the bytecode in the class
>> directly.
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org>
>>>> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:48 PM
>>>> Subject: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module
>>>>
>>>> Hi all guys!
>>>>
>>>> the annotations-processor module in Digester has been in a prototypal
>>>> status for a looooong time and I haven't had time/chances to make
>> it
>>>> working, so, since it has never been released before and I am busy as
>>>> heel and won't have the opportunity to work on it, unless someone
>>>> submits a patch to DIGESTER-158, I would be for dropping it and make
>>>> the build work (and possibly cut a release).
>>>>
>>>> Any objection?
>>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
>>>> -Simo
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org