"Roundtable on the Palestinian solidarity movement and Alison Weir" See the comments to: "Mondoweiss Breaks Silence Over The Alison Weir/JVP Controversy – Or Do They?" The lites go batshit about two undeniable truths, the power and malign influence of the Lobby, and the illegal Israeli organ harvesting. The upshot is that more people have heard about Weir, important as her main problem is censorship by the Jew-controlled media.

"The
Democratic Senate staffer suggested, however, that planting a hawkish
pro-Israel flag may be exactly what Schumer has in mind. “He’s basically
come out very early and said to the entire Democratic caucus, ‘Israel
issues are just off the table,’” the staffer said. “He’s saying, ‘Any
time anything like this comes up, you can count on me to be in the
extreme pro-Israel position.’ That’s a tell for the future.”
Laying down that marker, though, doesn’t necessarily mean killing
Obama’s Iran deal. The staffer told me Schumer knows that, according to
the procedure laid out in the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act,
if either chamber passes a resolution disapproving of the deal and
Obama, as he has promised to, vetoes it, the bill would then go back to
Congress, where only one chamber would need to sustain the veto for the
deal to stand. If that vote goes to the House—where Democratic leader
Nancy Pelosi (CA) has argued forcefully in support of the deal—first, then the Senate may never see the agreement again.
A Schumer bundler who supports diplomacy told me he suspected the
New York Senator was counting on it. “I would hope that someone who
aspires to be majority leader in the next round would not knowingly
undermine his own party’s president if he thought the deal was at risk,”
said the donor, who asked not to be named to preserve his access to
Schumer. Despite that likely calculation, the donor added, “I’m
disappointed with his decision to stand against a deal.”
With Pelosi marshaling support for the Iran accord in the House,
then, it seems unlikely to me that the deal will be upended by Schumer’s
opposition. But his position might yet become kindling that fuels
discontent among Democratic Senators on his future leadership role. “The
other thing that might be his undoing,” the Senate staffer told me of
Schumer’s leadership prospects, “is the government funding fight that
we’re going to have after the Iran debate. Schumer is positioned,
because he’s a deal-cutter, right in the center of it as a guy who wants
to triangulate out of this.” Bucking the White House and his fellow
Democrats for the second time in a row, only to side with Republicans,
on a major issue would be a “dangerous path,” the staffer said. “Then,
if that comes on the heels of Iran, you’ve got a situation where it’s
like, What the hell is Schumer up to?”"

"If I Were an Israeli Looking at the Iran Deal" There is not even a piece of punctuation in this that isn't a lie. We live in very educational times.

The American white supremacists, no doubt under the influence of Christian Zionism and also no doubt under the influence of bribes, never mention Jews as a problem. It is quite striking considering the virulent anti-Semitism of white supremacists in, say, the 60s and 70s. Suddenly, under the onslaught of the current education, I am reading express criticism of the Jews. See: "Obama Surprisingly Good – Opposes Foreign Wars for Foreign Interests" Remember that the election and reelection of Obama is the Holocaust for these people.

"Roundtable on the Palestinian solidarity movement and Alison Weir" See the comments to: "Mondoweiss Breaks Silence Over The Alison Weir/JVP Controversy – Or Do They?" The lites go batshit about two undeniable truths, the power and malign influence of the Lobby, and the illegal Israeli organ harvesting. The upshot is that more people have heard about Weir, important as her main problem is censorship by the Jew-controlled media.

"The
Democratic Senate staffer suggested, however, that planting a hawkish
pro-Israel flag may be exactly what Schumer has in mind. “He’s basically
come out very early and said to the entire Democratic caucus, ‘Israel
issues are just off the table,’” the staffer said. “He’s saying, ‘Any
time anything like this comes up, you can count on me to be in the
extreme pro-Israel position.’ That’s a tell for the future.”
Laying down that marker, though, doesn’t necessarily mean killing
Obama’s Iran deal. The staffer told me Schumer knows that, according to
the procedure laid out in the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act,
if either chamber passes a resolution disapproving of the deal and
Obama, as he has promised to, vetoes it, the bill would then go back to
Congress, where only one chamber would need to sustain the veto for the
deal to stand. If that vote goes to the House—where Democratic leader
Nancy Pelosi (CA) has argued forcefully in support of the deal—first, then the Senate may never see the agreement again.
A Schumer bundler who supports diplomacy told me he suspected the
New York Senator was counting on it. “I would hope that someone who
aspires to be majority leader in the next round would not knowingly
undermine his own party’s president if he thought the deal was at risk,”
said the donor, who asked not to be named to preserve his access to
Schumer. Despite that likely calculation, the donor added, “I’m
disappointed with his decision to stand against a deal.”
With Pelosi marshaling support for the Iran accord in the House,
then, it seems unlikely to me that the deal will be upended by Schumer’s
opposition. But his position might yet become kindling that fuels
discontent among Democratic Senators on his future leadership role. “The
other thing that might be his undoing,” the Senate staffer told me of
Schumer’s leadership prospects, “is the government funding fight that
we’re going to have after the Iran debate. Schumer is positioned,
because he’s a deal-cutter, right in the center of it as a guy who wants
to triangulate out of this.” Bucking the White House and his fellow
Democrats for the second time in a row, only to side with Republicans,
on a major issue would be a “dangerous path,” the staffer said. “Then,
if that comes on the heels of Iran, you’ve got a situation where it’s
like, What the hell is Schumer up to?”"

"If I Were an Israeli Looking at the Iran Deal" There is not even a piece of punctuation in this that isn't a lie. We live in very educational times.

The American white supremacists, no doubt under the influence of Christian Zionism and also no doubt under the influence of bribes, never mention Jews as a problem. It is quite striking considering the virulent anti-Semitism of white supremacists in, say, the 60s and 70s. Suddenly, under the onslaught of the current education, I am reading express criticism of the Jews. See: "Obama Surprisingly Good – Opposes Foreign Wars for Foreign Interests" Remember that the election and reelection of Obama is the Holocaust for these people.