Comments

Ping^2
2011/1/26 Robert Millan <rmh@gnu.org>:
> Ping!>> 2011/1/18 Robert Millan <rmh@gnu.org>:>> 2011/1/14 Robert Millan <rmh@gnu.org>:>>> 2011/1/12 Robert Millan <rmh@gnu.org>:>>>>> * The headers config/kfreebsd-gnu.h etc. override>>>>> GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER. But the 64-bit configurations>>>>> x86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu and x86_64-*-knetbsd*-gnu do not appear to>>>>> use any header that would override GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER32 and>>>>> GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER64, which are what LINK_SPEC in linux64.h>>>>> actually uses. Thus those configurations would use Linux-specific>>>>> dynamic linker settings, which seems unlikely to be as intended.>>>>>>>> It's not as intended. On amd64 we use /lib/ld.so.1 and>>>> /lib/ld-kfreebsd-x86-64.so.1.>>>>>> It seems x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu has been broken for a while. I>>> just realized that I wrote a patch to fix this in 2006 [1], but>>> somehow it was never merged in GCC (actually I'm not even>>> sure I submitted it).>>>>>> In the meantime Debian GNU/kFreeBSD has been using this>>> patch to build GCC on their "kfreebsd-amd64" port.>>>>>> I can prepare an updated version of this patch (relative to>>> trunk + your linux.h overhaul [2]).>>>> Here is it.>>>> -->> Robert Millan>>>>>> --> Robert Millan>

I advise CC:ing the relevant target maintainers on such patch submissions.
Since there is no *-kfreebsd-gnu maintainer (you might wish to volunteer
to be such), and no *-linux* maintainer for the linux*.h changes, this
means the people listed as maintainers of the i386 port.