DVDActive uses cookies to remember your actions, such as your answer in the poll. Cookies are
also used by third-parties for statistics, social media and advertising. By using this website, it is
assumed that you agree to this.

Death of a President (UK - DVD R2)

Our own Scott McKenzie takes a look at this recent and controversial docudrama

Feature

Death of a President is a docudrama set in the near future, telling a retrospective account of the assassination of President George W Bush on October 19th 2007. Bush is visiting Chicago to make a speech about the economy and North Korea when his motorcade runs into a group of 12,000 protestors. Members of the angry mob manage to break free of the police cordon and attempt to reach the presidential vehicle, which quickly takes a detour to reach its destination before the situation turns uglier.

Following his speech, the president meets a group of friendlier members of the public but just as he is about to leave the scene, he is shot twice in the chest. The secret service bundle him into his limousine and run him to hospital where, following surgery, he passes away. The focus of the film then turns to the investigation into the murder and the personal, economic, political and social impact of the death of the 43rd president of the USA.

It’s difficult to talk about Death of a President without addressing the controversy that has surrounded it. It has been accused of being anti-Bush and opportunistic, feeding on the growing fears of US activity in Iraq and Afghanistan to promote a political agenda. I do not subscribe to this opinion. This film is an attempt to tell a fictional story in a believable way and the documentary style works perfectly because the audience are presented with a format that is recognisable by conventions that are identifiable with non-fictional films.

Interviews, archive news footage and original footage are all edited together almost perfectly to place recognisable characters in situations created by the filmmakers. The only shots that take the viewer out of the film are when the actors are digitally integrated with archive footage. These shots don’t always look quite right but they are few and far between and are the only events that reflect the low budget of a film that is as expertly crafted as it is ambitious.

The biggest surprise I had while watching Death of a President was how compelling the story is. Once you know the title of the film, you know what’s coming but the filmmakers create an uneasy atmosphere and employ some techniques more akin to a thriller in the events leading up to Bush’s assassination. As the story progressed and I became increasingly gripped by the investigation, the political sentiment mattered less to me. The presence of George Bush was key to the film, but the fact that he was the president was almost incidental. Death of a President is a unique combination of genres: a thriller told in a documentary style with a structure that will be recognisable to anyone who has watched murder-mystery TV specials.

For this reason, Death of a President is similar in style to Errol Morris’ The Thin Blue Line. With no narrator to guide the viewer, we are forced to piece the pieces together ourselves with the evidence we are presented with and there are plenty of twists and turns to keep us guessing. Though certainly not made in a way that defends the policies of President Bush, Death of a President makes far less of an overt political statement than other recent documentaries such as Fahrenheit 9/11 and is all the more compelling and believable because of it.

Video

The piecemeal approach of constructing Death of a President is most obvious in the quality of the picture. Quickly cutting between different image sources, the video quality intentionally varies widely, even including original footage filmed on mobile phones to reflect the current trend in news reporting of broadcasting clips filmed by members of the public.

For this reason it is difficult to assess the overall standard because it is not clear how much of the pixilation, grain, edge enhancement and colour bleeding comes from the source material or is a product of post-production techniques. That said, these artefacts occur significantly less in the clips of scripted interviews and in general the 16x9 anamorphic picture does the job adequately.

Audio

For a film that imitates a style suited best to the small screen and not recognised for heavy use of directional sound, it is no surprise that the soundtrack of Death of a President is acceptable but, through not fault of its own, is never outstanding. The score sets the tone very well through the rear speakers but never drowns out the constant dialogue from the front. Given that this film is hot off press, it’s also no surprise that there is not noticeable interference on the audio track.

Extras

The commentary track with the filmmakers is filled with many interesting details about the film and the political fall-out from it. The director, Gabriel Range, comments that while some have accused Death of a President of being anti-Bush, others have accused it of not being anti-Bush enough. Along with the producers and editor, Range points out many of the points in the film where archive news footage was stitched together with the footage they filmed, in particular moments where extras were hired that were spitting images of real people who were shaking hands with the president.

The interviews with the filmmakers cover similar ground to their commentary and serves as a taster for the talk track. Finally, a short trailer for the US theatrical release is included to round out the extras.

Overall

I was expecting Death of a President to be a sober experience but I was very impressed by the filmmakers’ ability to create a wholly believable future-retrospective and the original story kept me gripped from beginning to end. The film is essential viewing and is complemented by a set of extras that provide good insight into the clever way it was put together.

Advertisements

Comments

Reply

Message

Enter the message here then press submit. The username, password and message are required. Please make the message constructive, you are fully responsible for the legality of anything you contribute. Terms & conditions apply.

Lincoln6Echo wrote: Well, I suppose I apologize for that statment, but he comes on and says that he hates my President. Shouldn't I get an apology for that?

I see where you're coming from and why you got annoyed. It irritates me when people make sweeping statements about how they hate Bush or Blair etc when we're only really fed fragments of information which (poorly) represents the labyrinth that people like Bush and Blair have to navigate every day.

But if I were to snap back at everyone who said they hate Bush, I'd probably find myself with a few sets of knuckles upside my face.

Anyhoo, at the end of the day, be grateful to Bush and Blair that at least we can legally express our views for or against them. Whatever good or bad they've done, we're still better off than countries where you and your family get shot for such comments.

Just because there might be a jihadist in Yemen, it doesn't mean everyone from there is. By that rationale it's OK to insinuate that everyone from the USA is a welfare-scrounging sister-fiddler seeing as that's a common stereotype.

It's basically racist to specifically single out someone who comes on this site to discuss DVDs with the rest of us and accuse them of terrorism, just because of where they come from. It's not what I come here for. I found it offensive and I personally feel an apology should be made.

Well, I suppose I apologize for that statment, but he comes on and says that he hates my President. Shouldn't I get an apology for that?

scottmck wrote: Lincoln6Echo wrote: Prejudice? Nah...you're right...there's no Jihadists in Yemen, how stupid of me. And 9/11 was an inside job too...

Just because there might be a jihadist in Yemen, it doesn't mean everyone from there is. By that rationale it's OK to insinuate that everyone from the USA is a welfare-scrounging sister-fiddler seeing as that's a common stereotype.

It's basically racist to specifically single out someone who comes on this site to discuss DVDs with the rest of us and accuse them of terrorism, just because of where they come from. It's not what I come here for. I found it offensive and I personally feel an apology should be made.

Lincoln6Echo wrote: Prejudice? Nah...you're right...there's no Jihadists in Yemen, how stupid of me. And 9/11 was an inside job too...

Just because there might be a jihadist in Yemen, it doesn't mean everyone from there is. By that rationale it's OK to insinuate that everyone from the USA is a welfare-scrounging sister-fiddler seeing as that's a common stereotype.

Sounds like a clever idea, and if it's genuinely not forcing an agenda down your throat (like a certain Mr Moore) then I'd be very interested in giving it a look sometime.

I'm not strongly for or against Bush myself. I've always maintained that since I don't know everything going on behind-the-scenes, any opinion I might have on his administration would probably be misinformed by an often-biased media. So it'd be nice to see a film that didn't present an agenda one way or the other. That was the part of the review that sold this DVD to me Scott.

I really applaud how they treated the whole thing like it was real. with the interviews with the guards, TV coverage and all but it still could have been a better movie

plus it wouldn't have hurt to use a president that wasn't alive. I hate Bush as much as the next sexually frustrated liberal but this is a little too much. still buy the dvd though, may move it up from 7.5 to an 8 after multiple viewings

I'm not Anti-Bush. I'm not Pro Bush either. I like the idea of this. I agree that this is a fictional story and should be treated as such. I realise it is a sensitive issue. I mean, the premise is horrible, the President of the USA being assassinated, it's happened before and could happen again (let's hope not though). I like the mockumentary way of making films, like Woody Allen's "Zelig". Good review, makes me want to see it now that I know about it a bit more (style and whatnot)