Translate

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

The Government are reeling under the constant pressure as their
neat cover-up involving Lord McAlpine and their Tory cronies dissolves into
chaos.

Victims and whistle blowers tweet that they will not be
intimidated or silenced this time. The Cover-up supported by the criminal
organisation existing within Parliament, the Courts, the Crown Prosecution
Service and the Police is starting to unravel.

Children abused over decades, laughed at,
intimidated, thrown into jail and threatened, are raising their voices and
saying NO MORE COVER-UP!

The public no-longer fooled by the fiction of democracy
and accountability and leadership are taking a new look at the alternative
media. People are seeing through the veils of delusion, seeing through the web of
hypocrisy and deceit woven by criminals who want to remain in power.

David Icke was right Jimmy Savile was a prolific
paedophile David Icke is right about a whole heap of things. Many other
people who know the truth are speaking out. Tom Watson
MP would not be silenced by a system designed to silence troublesome MP's

This time the
paedophiles will be removed from their privileged positions of power. Positions which allows then to rape and torture thousands of innocent
children. Positions which allow them to jail anyone who dare to expose their criminals activities.

Sonia Poulton wrote a great article 12 months ago following Tom Watsons revelations to Parliament. Since then the Government cover-up machine has been in full swing. But this time victims, whistle-blowers and concerned citizens who like children will not be brow beaten into submission.

In The weeks that have ­followed Jimmy Savile ­being
revealed as a paedophile his carefully crafted charitable reputation has been
obliterated. The ­national treasure decorated by the Queen and given keys to ­hospitals
has been laid bare and described by one investigating ­officer as “the most
prolific serial sex abuser in history”.

Labour MP Tom
Watson raised the issue of a paedophile ring in Parliament []Increasingly, though, rather than being the solitary
pervert operating with impunity, Savile may be the tip of a large iceberg.As more victims reveal abuse at the hands of Savile, or his
­extensive circle of friends, it ­appears the silence that ­surrounded him may
say less about his celebrity status and more about whom he may have implicated
had his crimes been exposed. Certainly we know that Savile was subject to at
least five police probes over five decades. All were quashed. Why? We have yet
to be told.For many it reeks of an establishment cover-up, though for
years detractors referred to it as “conspiracy theory”.Savile’s BBC colleague David Icke, who went from respected
broadcaster to laughing stock, was at the forefront of such claims in the
Nineties when he named Savile and others as paedophiles.Icke claimed Savile supplied children from Jersey’s
infamous Haut de la Garenne care home to a senior British MP. Savile denied
knowing the home, the scene of a police investigation in 2008 that uncovered
widespread child abuse. He lied. There is pictorial evidence of him there.

Savile may be the tip of a large iceberg

Last week, during Prime Minister’s Questions, Labour MP Tom
Watson raised the issue of a paedophile ring in Parliament and alluded to a
former PM. David Cameron, all perplexed, said he would look into it. Minutes
after PMQs, Tory MP Rob Wilson was on Sky News appearing to laugh off Watson’s
claims.This cannot go on. It was these sorts of hasty dismissals
that helped Savile get away with it. People laughed it off and claimed
“nutters” were saying it.Well I can tell Mr Cameron that this claim is not
sensational, anything but. In fact Tom Watson has barely scratched the surface.I have compiled a list of 132 ­utterly shameless
establishment child abusers. These include MPs, lords and local councillors. A ­similar
list for members of Her Majesty’s Constabulary exists.I don’t believe these lists are complete. This is not
conjecture or media gossip but people, ­primarily men, who have been prosecuted
for child sex offences throughout the UK.Many of these abusers still ­represent constituents and are
“serving the public”. At the very least we should know who they are, where they
are and if their public decisions are influenced by the greater good or their
own twisted perversions.As a journalist, and in light of the Savile revelations,
people have contacted me desperate to share their abuse stories.Some accuse powerful members of the establishment. Several
household-name MPs are said to have committed acts of degradation against
children as young as six.Yes, some of these callers may be jumping on the bandwagon
but not many are, as independent ­corroboration of their stories has already
confirmed.So let’s not be under any ­ illusion that this is only
about Savile. I fear it is far from it.The Government must immediately announce an independent
inquiry. It must be public and transparent and it must leave no stone unturned.
The credibility of Parliament is at an all-time low and serious questions must
be answered.Why did Ken Clarke, as justice minister, halve sentences of ­paedophiles
last year in a controversial announcement?Why did the Cabinet Office ­issue threatening letters last
week to internet bloggers ­ warning that they must not repeat allegations of a
child actor ­claiming to have been touched by a member of the Coalition?Then there is the question that overshadows the whole
Savile ­inquiry: why was he allowed to ­become so close to royalty and
government? Surely it is the job of the security services to investigate the
lifestyle of those who have access to our figureheads?Yes, this is a dark time in our nation’s history but we
must face it head on and keep going until we know the full, unexpurgated truth,
no matter how unedifying future revelations may be.Judging by some of the testi­monies I have heard it is
likely to be very shocking indeed. There is no alternative. The ­victims need
the truth to be told, no matter how powerful or con­nected their ­abusers may
prove to be.Sonia has said it all source Express Newspaper October 2012

Monday, 28 October 2013

It's five months since The Guardian first reported on just how
invasive the British intelligence agencies' internet and phone
surveillance is. [1] Politicians across Europe and America have been debating this ever since. But in the UK, our MPs have been mostly silent.

This Thursday, MPs have the chance to hold a substantial debate about the intelligence and security service, for the first time since Edward Snowden's whistleblowing hit the headlines. But for the debate to be really hard-hitting, and genuinely useful, lots of MPs need to turn up. [2]

Liberal Democrat MP Julian Huppert, Conservative MP Dominic Raab, and
Labour’s Tom Watson MP have secured the debate to raise concerns about
the need to make sure surveillance in this country is necessary,
proportionate and accountable.

But there’s a real risk that not many MPs will turn up. If enough of us
get in touch with our MPs now and ask them to attend the debate,
together we can prove that British citizens care about their civil
liberties and privacy.

"If MPs know that enough of their constituents care about a debate like this, they're usually much more likely to attend."
Julian Huppert, MP for Cambridge

When it was exposed that UK spy agencies have been intercepting our
private phone calls and internet traffic - and sharing it with the USA’s
security services - many people, including MPs and ministers, had no
idea that UK surveillance was so wide reaching. [3] But so far MPs
haven't had a chance to debate it.

Saturday, 26 October 2013

This is the story of Irene Brown an ordinary woman who believed in British Justice and the police all her life. She believed in British Law so much she even worked for the Police.

Then one day she found out the Police as a body are there not to protect the public but to protect themselves and corrupt officials. She also discovered that whistle-blowers will be set-up, have their valuables removed, thrown in jail and prosecuted by a corrupt system that is designed to punish whistle-blowers and protect corrupt officials and police involved in organised crime.Had Irene not been a union official and had her case not been taken up by an MP and raised in Parliament Irene and her husband would have gone to jail for a long time. The police are totally out of control and the CPS and the Courts are used to protect corrupt criminals.

This is the story:-

Until recently, Irene Brown enjoyed
the simple pleasures of comfortable middle-age: walking in the hills
around her home in a pretty Cumbrian village, listening to Classic FM
and making a valuable contribution to her community as a civilian police
worker.

Irene,
51, and her husband Steve, 54, were regarded as respectable,
law-abiding citizens who were always keen to help out friends and
neighbours, and spent many hours tending their vegetable patch.

They
were, in every sense, pillars of society. Why, then, did five police
officers knock on the door of their three-bedroom semi at 9am one day in
April this year, demanding to search the house?

Conscience: Irene Brown and her husband Steve
were held in cells after exposing her boss Cumbria's Police and Crime
Commissioner Richard Rhodes for swindling the taxpayer

The couple had just got up:
Irene was still in her pyjamas and Steve was vacuuming. Minutes later,
startled neighbours watched in disbelief as the police removed £2,000
worth of electrical equipment from the Browns’ house in evidence bags,
including a new computer, Irene’s iPad and her iPhone which contained
all her treasured photos.

So what terrible crime had the Browns committed to warrant such a heavy-handed invasion of their home?

The simple truth is: no crime
at all. Irene had done what many of us ought to do but dare not — she
spoke out against wrongdoing and turned whistleblower on her employer,
Cumbria Police.Speaking
exclusively to the Mail this week, a clearly angry and distraught Irene
throws a chilling light on how the public sector turned on a member of
its staff who dared to expose wrongdoing.

‘It’s
human decency to speak out if you see something wrong,’ says Irene.
‘It’s a moral duty. If you don’t do something about it, you’re almost as
bad as the perpetrators.

‘What
happened to me put me in a blind panic. When you work for the police,
you never picture a situation where you’re going to be locked in a
police cell. It was unbelievable.’Irene began her career with the
police in 2000, first in administration and later in project management.
In January this year, she was voted branch secretary for the Unison
union — a full-time position paid for by the police.

Two
months later she received an email from a colleague who had seen an
expenses claim made by Richard Rhodes, Cumbria’s Police and Crime
Commissioner (PCC).

The
person who sent her the email, an administrative worker, said Mr Rhodes
had billed the taxpayer £700 for two chauffeur-driven Mercedes trips to
dinner engagements.

Expenses and kiddy fiddler: Cumbria Police and Crime Commissioner Richard Rhodes He has not been arrested for stealing from the tax payer. he has not been thrown in a cell, he has not lost his valuables in a police raid. This corrupt and evil man is still Cumbria Police and Crime Commissioner. Is it also claimed that he is a paedophile? Well nothing new there

Mr
Rhodes was elected PCC in November 2012, and his job overseeing local
policing was supposed to make the constabulary more accountable to the
public. Irene was outraged the taxpayer was footing such a frivolous
bill, especially when the force had suffered large spending cuts.

Making
such documents public would be against constabulary rules — but Irene
felt she was duty-bound to act. After all, Mr Rhodes was officially
supposed to publish these expenses on his website, but had failed to do
so in the two months since he took the trips.

Irene
asked her colleague to give her hard copies of the invoices, then sent
them, anonymously, by post to her local newspaper, the Cumberland and
Westmorland Herald.

‘I
could have gone through the official whistleblowing procedure but I
feared it would have just been buried,’ she says. When the story was
published on April 5, local people reacted angrily and accused the
commissioner of squandering taxpayers’ money. But Irene was about to pay
a heavy price for exposing him.

She
had just left work one evening, five days later, when her mobile rang.
‘It was the police’s Professional Standards Department,’ she recalls.
‘They said I had to go back into the station and, if I didn’t, they were
coming to arrest me.

‘I
immediately realised what it must be about and started shaking. I felt
my life unravelling. I was overwhelmed by sheer panic.’

She
believes the police traced her as the source after searching the email
system. When Irene arrived at police headquarters in Penrith, she was
arrested and taken to the northern HQ at Carlisle.

There
she was searched before officers took her fingerprints, photograph and a
DNA swab. They also took away her handbag, phone, wallet and jewellery,
before locking her in a cell for an hour.

‘It
was humiliating and embarrassing — a nightmare. These were people who
had seen me as a colleague, and here was I in a cell, bare save for a
mattress and a steel toilet.

‘I remember just sitting there staring at my feet. I was in shock and felt as if my brain was shutting down.’

Later,
Irene was questioned for five hours by three officers, one of whom she
had enjoyed a good working relationship with. Terrified she would lose
her job and go to prison, she felt she had no choice but to deny
everything.

‘One
of the police officers, who I didn’t know as well, looked as though he
was enjoying interrogating me,’ she explains. ‘He was very persistent,
asking the same question over and over. If I didn’t give him the answer
he wanted, he kept on and on.’

Irene
was eventually allowed home at 11.30pm. ‘The only thing I regret is not
telling the truth in my first police interview,’ she says. ‘I knew I
had nothing to be ashamed of because I’d done the right thing. But I was
really panicking so I just denied everything.’

Irene
was bailed and suspended from work. That same day, the colleague who
had passed her the documents was arrested, and a second person was
suspended.

Ordeal: Irene was arrested and searched before officers took her fingerprints, photograph and a DNA swab

Police officers also descended
on the Cumberland and Westmorland Herald, demanding the invoices Irene
had sent them be handed over, and that the editor reveal the source of
the information.

Irene
says that if it weren’t for Steve, her husband of 27 years, she
couldn’t have coped with the ordeal — which was only just beginning.

Steve,
a former security device expert turned full-time carer for his elderly
mother, was about to feel the hand of the law himself. A week after
Irene had been bailed, the team of five officers turned up to search the
home in Penruddock.

Steve mentioned that he and Irene had recently replaced their old laptop and taken it to the refuse tip.

He
recalls: ‘When I told them about the old computer, they said they were
arresting me because I may have destroyed key evidence.

‘I
went to stand up but one of the officers put his hand on my shoulder
and pushed me back down — I couldn’t believe what was happening. I’m a
law-abiding person. The most horrible thing was being marched out to the
car afterwards. I thought anyone seeing it must think I was a
paedophile. It was a dreadful experience.’

Despite
having nothing to do with the leak to the Press, Steve was held in a
cell for 30 minutes before being questioned for an hour. He
says: ‘It was terrifying. The duty solicitor told me that what I was
accused of was very serious, and I could get life in jail for it. I
couldn’t believe what I was hearing.’Steve was bailed but the weeks that followed proved appallingly stressful for the Browns.Irene
was accused of breaching the Data Protection Act and misconduct in
public office — the second offence carries a sentence ranging from a
year to life in prison. Steve faced a charge of perverting the course of
justice, which can also result in a life sentence.

The
shadow hanging over them took its toll on their health, and both Irene
and Steve started taking anti-depressants to help them cope. Irene also
had to increase her medication for angina: since her arrest she’d been
having two to three attacks every day.

‘What
we were going through had a terrible impact on our health,’ says Irene.
‘We were paranoid, and started worrying that the police had bugged our
house.’

Irene
and Steve would make unlikely convicts. Irene is the daughter of
respectable, working-class parents, and has worked her way up from a
council house in Cheshire to owning her £200,000 three-bedroom home in
Cumbria.

She and Steve have just paid off their mortgage and have no debts, claim no benefits and share one car — a Nissan Note.

While
working long hours for the police, she obtained a first-class Open
University degree, then a Masters in politics. Her successful career
meant Steve was able to give up his job fitting burglar alarms four
years ago to look after his 83-year-old mother Iris, who has arthritis
and emphysema. He is studying for a degree in maths.

The
possibility that all their hard work could end with them being
imprisoned just as they were looking forward to retirement was a
terrifying prospect.

The investigation was slow to progress, and the couple’s bail dates were delayed several times.In May, Irene was questioned again for five hours after police officers reviewed her emails and internet history.

She said: ‘It was absolute nonsense, and I just answered “no comment” to every question.‘We
have a friend whose last name is Savile, and the police asked why I was
searching that name on Skype, asking me if I knew how bad that looked. I
realised afterwards it was a reference to Jimmy Savile — absolutely
ridiculous.’

But
there were glimmers of hope, too. Irene began receiving messages of
support from her former colleagues, and supporters approached her in the
street to console her. Cumbria
Police had recently shed 100 officers to meet new spending targets, and
there had been redundancies and pay freezes. Many constabulary
employees were enraged about the Commissioner’s expenses but had been
too afraid to speak out.

Support
for Irene’s cause seemed to gather pace and the story of her arrest
made stories in all the national newspapers, although she was not named.

Some
people reading her story might ask, was this not a case of union
official using underhanded tactics to destabilise her boss?

Irene insists not. She said that, although she was in the union she would not consider herself an extremist or trouble-maker.

Meanwhile,
Richard Rhodes, a veteran local magistrate, claimed he did not realise
how much the chauffeur-driven trips had cost, but publicly apologised
for his expenses bill and said he would be paying the money back.

He
assured the public that in future he would be relying on his £23,000
Hyundai car — another taxpayer-funded perk of his job as PCC.

Soon
afterwards, he raised eyebrows by recruiting a £30,000-a-year spin
doctor whose brief was to ‘raise the perception of him’ among the
public.

Then,
Irene switched on the television one day to see her case being raised
in Parliament during Prime Minister’s Questions. MPs across all parties
were astonished that a whistleblower could be arrested and were
demanding action.

Tory
MP Tracey Crouch said Irene’s case was an inevitable consequence of the
Leveson Report on the culture, ethics and practices of the Press. It is
feared many are now using the Report as an excuse to suppress those who
wish to leak sensitive information, despite it being in the public
interest.

Irene
says: ‘A fair society has a strong Press. One of the most important
roles of newspapers is to be that watchdog exposing hypocrisy.

‘If
people don’t have the courage to tell them about it, then it’s
naturally silencing journalists too.’ On May 23, a second civilian
police worker who was accused of helping Irene was told no charges would
be brought. Another, who had been suspended, was also cleared.

Charges
against Steve were dropped in August because of a lack of evidence but,
despite mounting public pressure, Cumbria Police persisted with their
investigation against Irene.It was only this week, after the police passed the file to the Crown Prosecution Service, that the threat of jail was lifted.

Prosecutors
agreed with MPs that any leak would have been in the public interest,
and therefore not subject to criminal prosecution.

‘I’m
relieved,’ Irene says. ‘But I’m only just coming to terms with the fact
that I won’t be going to prison. I’m just a normal person, and I
thought I’d just get my wrist slapped for what I did.

‘The response was absolutely disproportionate — I couldn’t believe they’d be so stupid.’

A
Cumbria Police spokesman said: ‘Staff have a duty to protect and manage
information they have privileged access to. Any allegations relating to
a breach of this position need to be investigated.’

Whistleblowing
put everything Irene holds dear at risk, but she says she would do it
all again, if only she could have avoided bringing her husband into it.

‘The
public had a right to know about those expenses,’ she says. ‘How are
the public supposed to hold the Police and Crime Commissioner
accountable if they don’t know what he’s doing?’Irene still faces losing her job at disciplinary proceedings which are due to take place in the next six months.

‘I
have months of uncertainty facing me where my job is concerned,’ she
says. ‘Surely integrity should be a celebrated quality in anyone working
for the police?

‘I hope something happens to give whistleblowers more protection. I don’t want anybody else to end up where I’ve ended up.’

Friday, 25 October 2013

Accused:
Jimmy Savile's former flatmate and chauffeur Ray Teret has been charged
with a series of serious sex offences against young girls

Jimmy Savile's former flatmate and chauffeur has been charged with a
series of serious sex offences against young girls, it has emerged.
Ray
Teret, 72, is charged with a total of 32 offences involving 15
different victims who accuse him of sexual abuse between 1962 and 1996.
The alleged offences were committed primarily in the Greater Manchester area.
Teret,
of Altrincham, Greater Manchester was charged with 15 counts of rape of
a female under 16, one count of rape, one count of attempted rape of a
female under 16, six counts of indecent assault of a female under 16,
three counts of indecent assault of a female under 14 and one count of
gross indecency with a child under 13.
He also faces two counts of
conspiracy to rape a girl under 16, one count of possession of extreme
pornography, one count of possession of prohibited images and one count
of possession of an indecent image of a child.
He is due to appear at Manchester City Magistrates Court on Saturday morning.
A
spokesman for Greater Manchester Police said: "A 71 year-old-man was
re-arrested in connection with historic sexual offences against children
when he answered his bail on Wednesday October 23.
"He was also further arrested in connection with a number of other historic sex offences against children.
"He remains in police custody for questioning."
DCI
Graham Brock of Greater Manchester Police said: “This has been a
complex investigation that was originally launched in October 2012 when
an initial complaint was made to Greater Manchester Police.
“Since
that time, we have carried out extensive and wide-ranging inquiries and
interviewed a number of people as part of that investigation.
“It
has been important those inquiries were carried out thoroughly so that,
in consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service, we have been able
to secure a number of charges.
“We will continue to support all
those women who have come forward and offer them whatever welfare they
need through the use of specially-trained officers.”
As part of
the investigation into Teret, William Harper, 65, of Stretford, Greater
Manchester was charged with conspiracy to rape a girl under 16 and
attempt rape of a female under the age of 16 and Alan Ledger, 62, of of
Altrincham was charged with indecent assault of a female under 16 and
aiding and abetting the rape of a female under 16.
Both Harper and Ledger are due to appear before Manchester City Magistrates' Court on 30 October.
Teret
was arrested and bailed in November last year with another man on
suspicion of historic rape following an investigation into three
separate claims of sexual abuse.
Police emphasised that the
accusations were not linked to the national inquiry into abuse by
disgraced TV presenter Savile, with whom Teret worked and once shared a
flat.

England's most senior family court judge is re-examining guidance
covering cases in which people face jail for being in contempt, after a
woman was imprisoned at a High Court hearing which did not feature on
any publicised lists of cases.

Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming
said the woman - jailed for 28 days by High Court judge Mrs Justice
Theis at the Royal Courts of Justice in London earlier this month - was a
victim of "secret" justice.
And Mr Hemming, who campaigns for
improvements to the family justice system, said the hearing was staged
in breach of recent guidance warning family court judges not to jail
people behind closed doors.
But officials at the Judicial Office -
set up by ministers to support judges - have defended Mrs Justice
Theis, who sits in the Family Division of the High Court.
A
Judicial Office spokesman said the hearing had arisen at "short notice"
and had not featured on lists posted in the Royal Courts of Justice and
on the internet.
Nevertheless, he said it had been held in open court.
And he said practice guidance issued in May about hearings relating to contempt of court had not been breached.
But
the spokesman said Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division of
the High Court and the most senior family judge in England and Wales,
would "consider widening the scope of the cases covered by his latest
guidelines".
And he said Sir James would explore if there was a
way to "alert the media to hearings such as this one which arise at
short notice late in the day".
On May 3, Sir James and Lord Judge -
then the Lord Chief Justice and the most senior judge in England and
Wales, published guidelines headed "Committal for Contempt of Court -
Practice Guidance".
The guidance was issued in the wake of newspaper coverage of a woman who had been jailed for being in contempt of court.
"It
is a fundamental principle of the administration of justice in England
and Wales that applications for committal for contempt should be heard
and decided in public, that is, open court," the guidance stated.
"Committal applications in the... Family Division should at the outset be listed and heard in public."
The woman was jailed by Mrs Justice Theis in a hearing held at 9.30am on October 11.
There
was no reference to the case on any public court lists - not by name or
case number - and Mrs Justice Theis was not listed as sitting at all on
that day.
A journalist was alerted to the hearing four days later by a member of the public.
Mr Hemming, who represents Birmingham Yardley, said Mrs Justice Theis had jailed the woman in breach of the guidance.
"She should have listed it with the names of the parties involved," said Mr Hemming.
"It is clearly in breach.
"It drives a coach and horses through the guidance.
"The principle is plain.
"People
should not be jailed without their fellow citizens having the
opportunity to attend so that they can see justice is done."
He added: "How can it be a public hearing if it isn't listed?
"How can anyone - journalists or members of the public - know that it's taking place if it isn't listed?
"No-one would know about it now if a reporter hadn't found out and asked questions.
"It was secret justice.
"If this had happened to a British citizen in a foreign country, people would be up in arms."
But the Judicial Office disagreed.
The spokesman said the case had been staged at short notice and had not been featured on public court lists.
But he said it had been held in open court.
He gave some detail of the case but did not name the woman or any other party involved.
"Mrs
Justice Theis did jail a woman for contempt of court for 28 days at a
hearing in open court at the Royal Courts of Justice at 9.30am on
October 11.
"The woman was represented by a solicitor and a barrister," he said.
"The
woman had refused - and continued to refuse - to reveal the whereabouts
of two children who are the subject of interim care orders.
"Recently
published practice guidelines cover applications to commit to prison
for contempt of court by one party against the other.
"This was a
different type of case at short notice, where the judge made the
decision to list the matter on October 11 at the end of a hearing the
day before.
"The woman was given until the following day to give
the information and, when she declined, she was found to be in contempt
of court and, after hearing mitigation from her barrister, she was
jailed.
"Mrs Justice Theis had not been due to sit on October 11.
"The case the previous day ended too late for it to be added to the public listings at the Royal Courts of Justice."
He added: "The President of the Family Division will consider widening the scope of the cases covered by his latest guidelines.
"He
will also explore if there is a way to alert the media to hearings such
as this one which arise at short notice late in the day."
In a
circular to judges sent in August, Sir James also said judgments must
also be made publicly available on the British and Irish Legal
Information Institute website following contempt hearings.
"The
principle is very clear and must be rigorously followed, no one is ever
to be committed for contempt of court by a family court... without the
name of the contemnor, proper details of the contempts and the reasons
for the committal being made publicly available in a judgment published
on the British and Irish Legal Information Institute website."
He
added: "We shall be subject to strong and entirely justifiable criticism
if it emerges that anyone has been committed since 3 May 2013 without
the name of the contemnor, proper details of the contempt(s) and the
reasons for the committal appearing on the British and Irish Legal
Information Institute website... I very much hope that there are no such
cases."
Mr Hemming said no judgment from the Theis case had appeared on the website.
"What
Sir James said about judgments seemed very clear," he added. "No
judgment from this case has appeared on the British and Irish Legal
Information Institute website. We don't even know this woman's name. I
strongly criticise Mrs Justice Theis."

It is not hard to see why many believe that the outrageous behaviours and cover-ups that were common in the past continue today.
Just consider these three examples:

The late (Sir) Jimmy Savile
The late (Sir) Peter Morrison
The late (Sir) Cyril Smith

Will Police Operations Fairbank, Fernbridge, and its sibling investigations into abuse dating back over 40 years
be ‘different this time?’
One could be forgiven for thinking that it will be more of the same
and ‘business as usual’. It seems that little, if any, real investment
has been made to resolve these crimes and eradicate child sexual abuse:

The fact that only 25 police in total
are working in the Met Police’s paedophile unit, despite an increase in
victims coming forward over the past year.
The fact that only 8 officers (from the 25 above) are working on Operation Fairbank.
The fact that many witnesses are being screened by charity-based organisations which are now at breaking point.

Where are the signs of real care and concern from our government and authorities? Where is the determination and most importantly, where is the investment?
Will it really be ‘different this time?’

The definition of a fool is said to be someone who
expects that doing the same thing over and over again will produce a
different result.

For it to be ‘different this time’, something major needs to have changed.
That major change could lie in this paradigm shift: Historically,
the Main Stream Media (MSM) has been quite compliant to government
requests. For example, although ‘D’ (and now ‘DA’) notices are only
advisory, it is usual for MSM to comply with them. But this compliance
also seems to extend beyond the formal notices, and into the realms of
the Gentleman’s Club. Such cosiness is a tradition that spans many
decades. The reward for loyalty might even be some gong or other awarded
to the higher echelons in the press organisations.
Today, Alternative Media don’t necessarily share those aspirations.
Many thousands of bloggers are very alert to what is really happening
and their sites are already serious competition for MSM. It’s not just
the blogs, of course, there are the social media sites such as Twitter
and Facebook, and the Internet Chatrooms and Forums.
Out there is a whole new world of social media and alternative news
that the establishment is only now trying to gets to grips with.
Wikileaks illustrates the changing of this paradigm.So how successful would a ‘cover-up’ be today?
Survivors and witnesses would have ready mouthpieces for their
stories on the alternative news sites, as would the police or other
officials and would-be whistleblowers who knew the truth. Blogs would be
scrambling to tell the full story and places like Twitter and Internet
Forums would be on fire.
Assuming that MSM played their traditional role there’d be no leakage there. But, would they continue to play by the old rules?
MSM’s life blood is being threatened by these internet upstarts (in fact
some journalists have already jumped ship into these alternative news
channels).
How long would it be before the first MSM caved and broke ranks with the old guard? Maybe it’s happening already?So, is a cover-up possible?
Yes, of course it is, but is it as likely to stick? I doubt it.
Remember that there are thousands upon thousands of ordinary people
who are utterly revolted by the crimes of abuse against children
committed both in the past and the present. Included in these many
thousands of people are serving police officers, judges, barristers,
care workers and journalists, to name a few, and they also want to see
these evil creatures brought to justice.
There is a ground swell of feeling that has been thoroughly misjudged
by people who should know better. Throwing out another dead paedophile
for the public to feast on isn’t going to wash anymore.

‘It may be that you are a vital witness or that you
possess crucial evidence, or that you have information that Operation
Fairbank need to complete the picture. To these people I want to say,
please do not assume that someone else is going to provide that
information. Please step forward and help.’The Operation Fairbank telephone number- 0207 1610500

A FORMER child protection officer claimed last night a
Special Branch detective held a gun to his head to stop him
investigating a VIP paedophile ring.

Chris Fay accused the Metropolitan Police of acting like “gangsters” [GETTY]Chris Fay said he was pinned to a
wall and throttled before being given a chilling warning to “back away”
from allegations surrounding the notorious Elm Guest House in Barnes,
south-west London.

Young boys in care were allegedly taken there
in the Eighties to be abused by high-profile MPs and other powerful
establishment figures.

Mr Fay, who worked for the now-defunct
National Association of Young People In Care, accused the Metropolitan
Police of acting like “gangsters” when news of the scandal broke in
1990. He revealed how some Special Branch members routinely threatened
him and his colleagues and even victims over a three-month period of
intimidation.

People seem to forget that Special Branch could do what they liked, they were a law unto themselves

Chris Fay

Mr Fay, 67, of south London, said:
“It became very dangerous. People seem to forget that Special Branch
could do what they liked, they were a law unto themselves.

“At
one point they had me up against a wall by my throat with a gun at my
head telling me in no uncertain terms that I was to back away if I knew
what was good for me.

“A colleague of mine had the same
treatment, as did a number of the volunteers. Victims who were actually
abused at Elm House were also physically stopped from coming to speak to
us at the NAYPIC office in north London.

“I witnessed Special
Branch officers manhandling them and turning them away with a warning to
keep their mouths shut. It was blatant, it was open, they were acting
like gangsters.In 1982 Elm Guest House was raided by the vice squad “In
the end we had to meet victims at a local community centre without the
knowledge of the police to hear what they had to say.” NAYPIC was given
the identities of senior politicians who formed part of an alleged
paedophile ring at the heart of government.

However, Mr Fay said: “I was told by the police implicitly, ‘We do not want you to come to us with big names’.”

In
a sinister twist, he said his kitchen window was shot at, leaving three
bullet holes in the glass, although he never found out who was
responsible.

In 1982 Elm Guest House was raided by the vice squad but allegations of child abuse were never followed up.

Operation Fernbridge is now investigating the claims and two men have been charged with sexual offences.

Police confirmed that Liberal Democrat MP Sir Cyril Smith, who died three years ago, visited the premises.

Last
night campaigner Bill Maloney, of Pie & Mash Films, who has helped
raise awareness of abuse survivors and corruption, said: “These police
cover-ups to protect the wealthy and the powerful need to stop now.

POINT 25 on the Illuminati Agenda: create and use national and international laws to Destroy Civilisation and destabilise society.

Instead of ‘conspiracy theory’, we’ve been talking for some time about ‘conspiracy realism‘. For the Illuminati who are pulling the strings of national governments by manipulating their central banks are very real indeed. So are the Bilderbergers as one of their key organisations. Equally the Freemasons who are so often blamed for what’s going on against all common sense.
However, only when I read the 25-point agenda
that was outlined on 01 May 1776 I realised that and how the world has
been duped by the originator of the Rothschild banking empire and a
smart Jesuit who planned a world government – by creating and using national and international laws to destroy civilisation. That’s what the last agenda point no 25 says.
The history of the Illuminati covers all major world events and is laid out beautifully here in 2 pages – in a journal that advocates economic democracy (!!!).
As victims of white collar crimes in the UK, we are but victims of
everybody who pays governments who pay ‘public servants’ with salaries
and pensions. Too bad that these tend to be soo greedy that often enough
they act as criminals. And they are immune from prosecution thanks to Royal Charters.
And judges are not weighing up the sins of the victim against the sins
of the culprit to find justice. No, they are the umpire between players
of ‘ping pong’, where the balls are ‘points in law’. No wonder Litigants
in Person don’t stand a chance. No wonder that those who do try, often
enough are labelled as ‘vexatious’: for they vex the judge. 191 of them since 1950. How many have given up before being given that label???
No wonder Evan Whitton published Our Corrupt Legal System – Why we are All Victims – except rich criminals…
The Illuminati began as a pan-European conspiracy that spread to the
USA and set up the Bank of Japan in 1882 – before the Federal Reserve in
1913. What is soo disgusting to me is the utter perversion of knowledge and the kind of enlightenment that had spread in the 14th – 17th century in Europe as ‘renaissance’. The Illuminati objectives and agenda are here.
But just as any tool, so can any mind be used for good or for evil.
Let’s make sure we remain on the right side! And do click a few times,
if this topic is new to you!
For me, the ‘shock therapy’ developed along these ‘milestones of disillusionment‘:

Thursday, 17 October 2013

Jimmy Savile told a cop to “p*** off” when he was caught trying to seduce an under-age girl in his Rolls-Royce.
Ex-PC
Paul Leonard says the twisted DJ, who was parked in a lay-by, said:
“I’m waiting for midnight when she turns 16… so p**s off if you want to
keep your job.”
Mr Leonard, 68, claimed yesterday: “There wasn’t a copper in Leeds who didn’t know Savile was a pervert.”
Speaking
exclusively to the Mirror, Mr Leonard claimed it was common knowledge
in the old Leeds City force that Savile “liked them young” – but his
influence meant officers were too scared to confront him.
It was
in 1965 when police could have trapped Britain’s most prolific sexual
predator – before he went on to sexually abuse hundreds of women and
girls.
Mr Leonard, 68, whose name we have changed at his request,
was then a young constable as he patrolled the area near Roundhay Golf
Club in Leeds.Public image: Savile with his Rolls

Mirrorpix

He said: “We used to use the old fashioned Noddy bikes, like
on the TV show Heartbeat, and I was on patrol near where Savile used to
live when I came across his Rolls-Royce parked in a lay-by in a very
secluded spot.
“At first I remember thinking ‘has his car been stolen?’
“I approached the vehicle and could see the lights were on. He was in the driver’s seat and next to him was a very young female.
“He was a famous local figure at the time but it was before his Radio 1 days with the BBC.
“When the window wound down I was quite impressed it was him.
“He had this tartan coloured hair. He was blond but had died it red and green in patches.
“I said, ‘What are you doing, Jimmy? What’s the matter?’
"He replied, ‘I’m waiting for midnight. It’s her 16th birthday tomorrow’.
“I didn’t know what he was talking about at first, then he gave me this wink, and I realised what he was talking about.
"I checked my watch and saw it was 11.45pm. There was just 15 minutes to go and he seemed quite anxious.
“I looked over to her and asked her if she was OK, and she just smiled at me but didn’t say anything.
"She
was definitely young. She looked around 15, and dressed herself like
the model Twiggy. She was skinny and wearing fashionable clothes.
“Savile
looked at me and told me to ‘piss off’. Then he said, ‘If you want to
keep your job I suggest you get on your bike and f-off’.
"He wasn’t angry. It was more like bragging. I was only young and worried about keeping my job so I left them.”Monster: Savile working as a hospital porter at Leeds General Infirmary

Mirrorpix

He admits: “Looking back I feel bad about it, but he had so much influence. I would definitely have lost my job.”
Later,
at the end of his shift, he recounted the incident to his sergeant who
cut him off, saying: “Shut up, son, he’s got friends in high places. If
you know what’s good for you, you’ll leave it there.”
Mr Leonard added: “There wasn’t a copper in Leeds who didn’t know Savile was a pervert.
“But he was so well-connected. He was like a superstar.
“Even mentioning his name on the door of a nightclub would get you inside for free. The police were in the palm of his hand.”
The
former cop, who originally contacted the Jeremy Vine show on BBC Radio 2
yesterday, stayed on for three years in what later became West
Yorkshire Police.
Savile, who died in 2011 aged 84, is suspected
of raping 34 women and girls, and sexually assaulting 450 more,
including children as young as eight. It is claimed he used his
celebrity status to hide his dark secrets.
Yesterday it was revealed a former West Yorkshire inspector is being investigated over claims he intervened on behalf of Savile.

The IPCC is looking into claims that he inappropriately contacted Surrey Police before the force interviewed Savile in 2009.
Pressure is now mounting on senior officers after a shocking transcript of the police interview was released.
Arrogant
Savile repeatedly reminded Surrey Police detectives of his charity work
as he fobbed them off with lies, bluster and legal threats.
And he boasted that he brushed off young girls “like midges”.
West Yorkshire police declined to comment last night.
Britain’s
top prosecutor today publishes new guidelines on tackling child sex
abuse after the Savile scandal highlighted huge failings in the system.
CPS
chief Keir Starmer said the vulnerability of victims should not longer
be a barrier to justice – and investigations should be far more
rigorous.

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

4 days ago we were told that Operation Fernbridge has produced some new activity
according to Exaro Police are investigating claims that an ex cabinet
minister., wildly assumed to be Leon Brittan sexually abused a boy. So what is happening now?

The Minister is one of a clutch of six conservative MP’s who
frequented gay brothels and abused
boys in Amsterdam about 30 years ago. After that they must have stopped of course and have never
been interested in paedophilia since I don’t think.But lets see what happens!

They are also investigating a boy from a London children's
homes was taken from the home and abused by the same ex minister. What about Dolphin Square and Brighton?

The Policewere
earlier secretly told by the Crown
Prosecution Service to drop the caseagainst the same ex minister for the rape of a young woman. Told to drop the Case bythe
Crown WHY?

A complaint dating from the 1960s by a young woman alleging rape by the
ex-minister is not being pursued after the Crown Prosecution Service
advised that the guidelines and law at the time could not justify the
charge.

The lady said that at the time she was very young but looked
even younger than her actually age and she was raped by the ex minister in his
home.

But the CPS have come up with somerubbishthat at the time the rape took place rape was not possible unless the
girl made it explicit she was refusing sex .Err what the Fxxx does that mean.

She should have made it clear to Leon Brittan “Although I am screaming stop and you are raping me and I am very youngbut just over the age of consent I have to
adviseyou that I explicitly refuse to
have sex with you. I do this in the event that 30 years later the authorities
may listen to my complaint against you.”

The Criminal justice system in the UK iscomplete and utter propaganda. The CPS
prosecute whisltblowers and victims of child abuse but never the elite perpetrators! One interesting comment said:-

Things are never that simple, my father who died last year was a police constable all his life and never wanted promotion.
He told us that London care homes were sending boys in taxis to parties in
several places but mainly Brighton to be used in sex games. He said they
were protected by AIPAC which is some jewish group witha lot of clout,
he said many policemen were angry at this but could do nothing