In March 1989, the 'Exxon Valdez' spilled over 10 million gallons (ca 38 million I) of crude
oil into Prince William Sound, Alaska , USA. The spill was followed by massive clean-up using hot seawater
at high pressure as well as other mechanical and chemical techniques. We studied initial damage
and subsequent recovery in the upper margin of the Fucus gardneri assemblage on protected shores by
comparing sites that were unoiled, oiled and cleaned with hot water at high pressure, and oiled but less
intensely cleaned. F. gardneri cover averaged 80% on unoiled sites but< 1 % on all oiled and cleaned
sites 18 mo after the spill. The abundances of barnacles, littorine snails and limpets varied among sites
and species, and this variation was associated in part with differences in their life histories. F. gardneri
cover was still extremely low on oiled and cleaned sites 2.5 yr after the spill. Holdfasts that persisted
after cleaning did not resprout. F. gardneri recruitment was lowest at intensely cleaned sites, and most
recruits occurred in cracks near adults. Recruits were less abundant under adult canopies but placing
canopies over recruits did not decrease their survivorship over 5 mo. Natural weathering of tar was
rapid, with most marked patches gone in less than 1 yr. We conclude that intense mechanical cleaning
following this oil spill increased damage and slowed recovery. Such methods should be avoided if
reduction of environmental damage is the primary objective of post-spill management decisions. The
recovery of F. gardneri at its upper margin might be enhanced by devices that retain moisture and
increase substratum rugosity.