11
comments:

Bill Elder
said...

The delay is a theatrical ploy to make the rubes believe this trial wasn't fixed - why not a jury? because this mutt and his shyster know he has zero credibility with regular people and judges are easy to er, uh - "persuade".

I really don't think it matters what happens with the trial verdict - the trial was the punishment - a means to a result- ait is the stigma attached to the dirty laundry aired in public which has finished Ghomeshi - at best he was an arts community-CBC no talent parasite/predator, that avenue is closed to him, he hasn't the talent for anyone to take a risk on - he could try politics, but naw, the BDS&M community is too small to elect him locally

- so, mission accomplished for Mothercorpse - the CBC threw a trouble maker to the wolves, cleaned house and sent a message to other egomaniacal celebs and polis who threaten Corpse supremacy that no one is big enough not to be destroyed by strategically leaked innuendo/accusation. Fembos have their strawman to burn, the media can gnaw on the bones of a fallen comrade and those who hate hypocritical pretention in PC icons are warming themselves in the glow of Ghomeshi's fall from grace, cosmic justice has prevailed and the universe unfolds without interruption - even without a verdict.

i heard numerous interviews with various supposed spokes-burgers from the "bondage community" and they didn't seem to be impressed with sugar ray jian blindsiding his partners with choking & punching... and not getting explicit consent beforehand.

these people arrange safewords beforehand so as not to confuse "oh, gawd... no" from "stop right now, you're hurting me."

bondage these days, as i understand it, isn't about beating the snot out of unsuspecting victims.

I think the most ironic thing about this trial is that the very same tactics which Ghomeshi would have been the first to decry in that weepy, sentimentalist shamltzy Q essay of his are the precise tactics which are likely going to result in his being found not-guilty.

This is a tough one, because the left has expressed a desire to change sexual assault trials to a reverse onus models, and so Ghomeshi, if the left had an consistency anyway, should fall on his sword to protect the poowr defeneless strong independent wymxns. I'd like nothing more than to see Ghomeshi get an extended vacation in one of Correction's Canada's most exclusive resorts, since if it was anybody else, especially a semi-Conservative white guy, Ghomeshi would be the first calling for his blood, regardless of evidence.

But, this trial has also exposed the fact that strong independent wymxns are known to LIE about sexual assault, which disrupts the leftist narrative that wymxns never lie, and destroys the narrative that what we need to boost the rate of conviction is a reverse onus model. Rather, it shows that all of the rape alarmists have been lying all along.

Leftist pretzel logic in a nutshell has come full circle with Ghomeshi, to the point that the point of view of the right wing has triumphed regardless of the verdict. If all he did was to expose that the left is full of liars and hypocrites, then maybe we ought to thank him.

*"anon says... strong independent wymxns are known to LIE about sexual assault"

i'm gonna posit that "strong independent wymxns" would have fought back on the spot, or gone straight to a police station... but that just means these three ladies were not as strong & independent as they thought they were.

the only question that really matters here is... did ghomeshi choke and slap these women without prior explicit consent?

Anonymous Anonymous said..."the left has expressed a desire to change sexual assault trials to a reverse onus models"

Amen Bro, as with so much the left do, like choke-hold Ghomer there, hypocrisy is the underpinning of the social justice piety - a sick duality they spend a lifetime hiding/dodging.

It comes from the childish self-centered notion that it's different for them, "they" being so engaged in the "righteous crusade" that they are exempt from linear application of logic/law/justice/morals/ethical behaviour -t's for the cause you see - the greater end result - the socially just utopia to be built on dual standards - one for you and one for them.

And so we non justice warriors, must sit and watch this freak show and are censored for making objective observations of its toxic hypocrisy.