I was disappointed to discover(but should have known based on the Thailand origin) that this camera has the inferior rectangular finder attachment. The last camera I possessed with this feature was my D200, and it also had a plastic outer finder lens which scratched easily.

I do not need MA now. My 5D II was calibrated by Canon. 70-200 2.8 L, 70-200 4.0 L, 24-105 4.0 L and 100 2.8 work perfect without MA. And my Sigma 50mm 1.4 does very fine after the frontfokus was calibrated by Sigma. Of course I do not know, how they will perform with a new body.

Ralph Conway wrote:
I do not need MA now. My 5D II was calibrated by Canon. 70-200 2.8 L, 70-200 4.0 L, 24-105 4.0 L and 100 2.8 work perfect without MA. And my Sigma 50mm 1.4 does very fine after the frontfokus was calibrated by Sigma. Of course I do not know, how they will perform with a new body.

Ralph

How do you calibrate your camera if every lens need different amount of MA? Do I need to send my lens collection for calibration? Knowing the current state of Nikon QC I doubt every D600 is precisely identical, having dual D600 can take some challenge if their calibrations don't match.

Sami Ruusunen wrote:
How do you calibrate your camera if every lens need different amount of MA? Do I need to send my lens collection for calibration? Knowing the current state of Nikon QC I doubt every D600 is precisely identical, having dual D600 can take some challenge if their calibrations don't match.

I do not know how it works for Nikons. With Canon (for me) it worked this way: New camera is checked an calibrated (if necessary) for free (warranty) at a CPS Partner. After you check a new lens and let it calibrate (if necessary) if you purchhase one.
Of course this is not working well for rented lenses. And yes, it might generate big problems with any additional body.