Italy’s Election Shows Europe’s Anti-Migrant Populism Not in Decline

While some observers argue that Europe’s ‘populist right’ is now in retreat, James Dennison, Andrew Geddes and Matthew Goodwin explain the rising appeal of anti-immigration parties in Italy ahead of the forthcoming elections.

Supporters of the Northern League (Lega Nord) party hold a sign saying “Italy for Italians” at a demonstration in Rome, December 10, 2017.Andrea Ronchini/NurPhoto via Getty Images

On March 4, Italy will head to the polls to elect a new parliament. For the European Union, the election will be the latest test of whether “populists” really are in retreat.

Last year was a mixed bag for the populist right. While Marine Le Pen and Geert Wilders failed to cause an upset, Alternative for Germany broke through while the Freedom Party of Austria returned to a governing coalition. Across western Europe, populist right parties dipped slightly in the polls as concern over the migrant crisis and immigration waned. Italy, however, was – and still is – the one exception.

In the five years since the last general election, immigration has gone from a non-issue in Italian politics to the second most important.

As shown in Figure 1, in the five years since the last general election, immigration has gone from a non-issue in Italian politics to the second most important. In May 2013, a mere 4 percent of Italians saw immigration as one of the two most important issues affecting their country; by November 2017, the figure was 33 percent. Similarly, fewer than 1 percent saw terrorism as an important issue at the time of the last election – today, it is the joint third most important issue to Italians.

Simultaneously, the home soil issues for the mainstream parties – economics and employment – are in decline in perceived importance. Incredibly, no social issues – such as education, health, social security or housing – currently make the top eight. This is bad news for the social democrats – the incumbent Partito Democratico (PD).

Figure 1: What do you think are the two most important issues facing Italy at the moment?

Eurobarometer, May 2013 and November 2017, top 8 issues only

Figure 2 shows that the governing PD have been in continuous decline since their barnstorming performance at the 2014 European Parliament election. Previous prime minister, Matteo Renzi, placed all of his bets on economic and constitutional reform and the party now has little to show for either, alienating its left wing, who have gone on to form Liberi e Uguali (LeU), and losing Renzi himself as prime minister, replaced by the incumbent Paolo Gentiloni. The PD’s offer to voters is far more limited than in its 2014 heyday.

Figure 2: Party opinion polling in Italy since the 2013 general election

Elezioni.interno.it

The last six months have seen the steady rise of the increasingly anti-immigration and Berlusconi-led conservatives, Forza Italia, and the populist right Lega Nord. The latter, led by Matteo Salvini, have thrown off their erstwhile regionalist trappings for a textbook and nationwide anti-immigration platform. It is these two parties that, alongside the far-right Fratelli d’Italia and some minor centrists, together have formed the largest electoral coalition (pacts to optimize first-past-the-post seats), as shown in Figure 3. By contrast, the PD have found themselves stranded alone on the left.

Figure 3: Electoral list polling for the next general election

Elezioni.interno.it

How can we explain the growth and strength of this coalition of right-wing populists? One factor is immigration. Lega Nord were polling at just 4 percent in 2014. Since then, Italy has witnessed a sharp rise in the numbers of migrants and refugees. In 2016, around 170,000 migrants and refugees arrived in Italy by sea while last year just over 117,000 did so, following a deal with Libya to intercept and return migrants. While this deal initially was successful in stemming flows, in recent months arrivals have returned to their previous levels and the deal was said to be on the verge of collapse.

Lega have sought to capitalize on concern about irregular migration by turning away from northern regionalism – dropping the “Nord” in campaign literature – and focusing solely on anti-immigration rhetoric. Their Euroskepticism, at one time aimed squarely at opposition to the euro, has been reframed in terms of migration, both as a way to play to their strengths and to allay voters’ fears of economic mismanagement.

Salvini’s Euroskepticism is increasingly in the abstract rather than in policy terms (see Figure 4). This is a similar move to that made by Le Pen and one designed to keep all eyes on the divisive immigration issue and, as in the recent Austrian election, the perceived threat of Islam.

Figure 4: Lega poster: ‘Slaves of Europe? No, thanks!’

leganord.org

Anti-European rhetoric plays better with Italians than at any point in the past and the reason is again partly immigration. Nearly 80 percent of Italians reject the suggestion that the E.U. has handled the migration crisis well. This leaves Italians as the most negative of the nine European countries in our data, behind even the Hungarians.

Italians are also the only country in which sentiment toward the E.U.’s handling of the crisis worsened throughout 2017. They are more sympathetic to their own government’s management of the situation: A majority of voters from all four major parties think the government’s deal with Libya was right.

Figure 5: Lega Nord polling and immigration’s issue salience

Ipsos Italia

However, as concern over immigration went up, Lega were the primary beneficiaries, as shown in Figure 5. Indeed, last month, our data revealed that 63 percent of Lega voters see immigration as one of the two most important issues facing Italy – compared to 26 percent of those who plan to vote for the PD, 28 percent of M5S voters, 46 percent of FI voters, and 48 percent of those supporting the smaller, far-right Fratelli d’Italia party.

Younger Italians are far more concerned by immigration than their older counterparts.

Interestingly, younger Italians are far more concerned by immigration than their older counterparts – 37 percent of the under-50s see immigration as a top issue compared to just 31 percent of Italian pensioners. This should be seen alongside Marine Le Pen’s appeal to the under-40s last year and Alternative for Germany’s strong support among 30–59 year olds as evidence that the populist right in Europe has more gas in the tank than might be assumed.

The alliance of Lega and Forza Italia appears shrewd in light of the new, more majoritarian electoral system. Electorally, Lega can concentrate in the north while FI concentrates elsewhere. Ideologically, hesitant voters of either can turn for reassurance to their likely electoral partners, respectively, for a hard line on immigration or relative economic competence, a scenario akin to Leave’s twin campaigning in the U.K.’s 2016 E.U. referendum. However, the right-wing electoral list is still unlikely to gain a majority in either chamber of the Italian Parliament, nor would its constituent parties necessarily enter into government together.

Figure 6: Trust in political institutions

Demos

The right’s most obvious governing partners, in terms of attitudes to immigration, are the Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S), who have led in the last 30 consecutive polls. The ideologically ambiguous populists rose to prominence during the Eurozone debt crisis, as Italians’ trust in their political institutions crumbled (see Figure 6). Their prime ministerial candidate, Luigi Di Maio, (founder Beppe Grillo, like Berlusconi, is banned from running for office) has called for an “immediate stop to the sea-taxi service” in reference to the role of NGOs in Mediterranean “search and rescue” missions for migrants at sea. However, a governing coalition, increasingly mooted by the M5S leadership, would risk either alienating their left-wing base or getting into bed with the establishment, incumbent PD.

Despite a bewildering party system and in the shadow of a center-left government proactively clamping down on irregular migration, it seems safe to say that those hoping for 2018 to bring an end to anti-immigration populism in the West should turn away on March 4.

About the Authors

Professor of Politics, University of Kent

Matthew Goodwin is professor of politics at the University of Kent and associate fellow at Chatham House. He is also a senior fellow in the U.K. on a Changing Europe project. His most recent publications include “Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain” (Routledge, 2014) and “Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union” (Cambridge University Press, 2017). He tweets as @GoodwinMJ.

Director, Migration Policy Centre at the European University Institute

Andrew Geddes is director of the Migration Policy Centre at the European University Institute and coauthor (with Peter Scholten) of “The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe” (Sage, 2016). He tweets @AndrewPGeddes.

Research Fellow, Migration Policy Centre at the European University Institute

James Dennison is a research fellow at the European University Institute in Florence. He leads the Observatory of Public Attitudes to Migration within the Migration Policy Centre. His interests include attitudinal formation and electoral behavior. He has published in a number of academic journals and is the author of “The Greens in British Politics” (Palgrave, 2016). He tweets as @JamesRDennison.

Republish this article

Our mission is to empower stakeholders and the wider public with high quality information, insights, and analysis on critical global issues. To help achieve this, we encourage you to republish the text of any article that contains a Republish button on your own news outlet.

By copying the HTML below, you agree to adhere to our republishing guidelines.

By copying the HTML below, you agree to adhere to our republishing guidelines. Click to expand

In republishing any of our articles:

Ensure that you include a line of our HTML tracking code on every article you republish. This is a lightweight, efficient way for us to see the number of page views of each specific article published on our partners’ websites. This does not affect page layout, nor does it provide any information about your users, other web pages on your site, or any further data. By copying and pasting the HTML code in the box below, the tracking code is automatically included.

If, for any reason, you do not copy the code prepared for you, you must paste this code snippet into the end of the article in your CMS:

Note at the top and/or bottom of the story that it originally appeared on Refugees Deeply. This note should include a direct link to the original article and a sentence that offers the reader the opportunity to join the Refugees’s mailing list. Our recommended example is:

This should read : “This article originally appeared on Refugees Deeply. You can find the original here. For important news about the global migration crisis, you can sign up to the Refugees email list.”

Do not republish a photo without our written permission. Some sources don't allow their images to be republished without permission.

Do not translate a story into another language without our written permission.

We often republish pieces from our partners. If you want to republish a partner’s story, you must credit the original partner and include a “via News Deeply” link.

Note that News Deeply considers the publication date to be the date marked on the story, and is not responsible for any content that you choose to repost.

After republication on the partner website, if you make an accompanying post on social media referencing the republished article, you must include the relevant Deeply social media handle in such post. For example, (i) for Twitter posts this means adding the appropriate @Deeply tag such as @SyriaDeeply, @WaterDeeply, or @WomensGirlsHub and (ii) for Facebook this means tagging the appropriate Deeply page in your Facebook post.

News Deeply material may not to be provided, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, to third parties or affiliates for redistribution through those entities, unless you have received prior written approval from News Deeply.

You may not automatically or systematically republish any material from our sites; all stories must be chosen individually for republishing.

You may not sell our content or republish it for commercial purposes without our prior written consent.

We reserve the right to request that any partner ceases republication of our content, including but not limited to if the guidelines listed above not being followed.

If you have any questions or concerns please contact community@newsdeeply.com

We have updated our Privacy Policy with a few important changes specific to General Data Protection
Regulations
(GDPR) and our use of cookies. If you continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies. Read our
full Privacy Policy here.