Him bursting into flames was okay, what was a major "WTF?!" moment for me is the way he ran madly allll the way from Rath Dínen to the "prow of the ship" cliff and jumped off. That was just ridiculous.

Him bursting into flames was okay, what was a major "WTF?!" moment for me is the way he ran madly allll the way from Rath Dínen to the "prow of the ship" cliff and jumped off. That was just ridiculous.

Not really, burning to death is the worst way to die so he jumped off the cliff to quickly make his death painless

Previous interviews said that it would be the same length or shorter than AUJ, but they probably still cutting the movie, we should probably know something by the time of the premieres (end of November)

I have to admit I sometimes baffled by the CGI hate. I mean "you can't use pretty CGI to cover up for a bad story" I can understand (if not necessarily agree with - I can enjoy a painting without a story, so why can't I appreciate CGI artwork regardless of story), but people seem to be saying that having CGI all makes a movie suck.

I have to admit I sometimes baffled by the CGI hate. I mean "you can't use pretty CGI to cover up for a bad story" I can understand (if not necessarily agree with - I can enjoy a painting without a story, so why can't I appreciate CGI artwork regardless of story), but people seem to be saying that having CGI all makes a movie suck.

Who is saying that?

Gravity is practically nothing but the actors' faces composited into a vast digital landscape. Yet it is the greatest achievement in the history of cinema.

I have to admit I sometimes baffled by the CGI hate. I mean "you can't use pretty CGI to cover up for a bad story" I can understand (if not necessarily agree with - I can enjoy a painting without a story, so why can't I appreciate CGI artwork regardless of story), but people seem to be saying that having CGI all makes a movie suck.

I saw a 3D trailer attached to Gravity, and oh my God did it look *****ing awful. The image appeared as though there were cardboard cutouts set at various distances from the camera. I can't believe it was actually filmed with 3D cameras. Looks like one of those post-production hack jobs. Definitely seeing 2D.

Ever hopeful, I'll once again be trying it in 48 fps 3D. It didn't work at all for me and in fact pissed me off to watch it that way the last time, but I've got to give it a try just for the outside chance that I will see an improvement.