The Toledo Blade's reports on Coingate - the unfolding tale of how Ohio's Bureau of
Workers' Compensation misused funds - deserve much more national
attention than they have received so far. For one thing, it's an
entertaining story that seems to get weirder by the week. More
important, it's an object lesson in what happens when you have
one-party rule untrammeled by any quaint notions of independent
oversight.

In April, The Blade reported that the bureau, which provides financial
support for workers injured on the job, had invested $50 million in
Capital Coin, a rare-coin trading operation run by Tom Noe, an
influential Republican fund-raiser.

...Meanwhile, The Blade uncovered an even bigger story:
the Bureau of Workers' Compensation invested $225 million in a hedge
fund managed by MDL Capital, whose chairman had strong political
connections. When this investment started to go sour, the bureau's
chief financial officer told another top agency official that he had
been told to "give MDL a break."

By October 2004, state officials knew that MDL had lost almost the
entire investment, but they kept the loss hidden until this month.

How could such things happen? The answer, it has become clear, lies
in a web of financial connections between state officials and the
businessmen who got to play with state funds.

Oh, boy, politicos and businessman in bed together - wake me up if the subject turns to cattle futures, real estate, and balked S&L investigations.

Krugman presents the Big Picture:

Now, politicians and businessmen are always in a position to do each
other lucrative favors. Government is relatively clean when politicians
are sufficiently afraid of scandal to resist temptation. But when a
political machine controls all branches of government, and those
officials charged with oversight are also reliably partisan,
politicians feel safe from investigation. Their inhibitions dissolve,
and they take full advantage of their position, until the scandals
become too big to hide.

In other words, Ohio's state government today is a lot like Boss
Tweed's New York. Unfortunately, a lot of other state governments look
similar - and so does Washington.

...The message from Ohio is that long-term dominance by a political
machine leads to corruption, regardless of the policies that machine
follows or the ideology it claims to represent.

And he concludes with some ritualistic Rep-bashing (I can almost smell the incense, but that might be this especially aromatic blend I am sipping). [UPDATE: Somehow Krugman misses all these Dems and independents with union ties found by RedState - a majority of the oversight board, actually.]

So what does it mean? Surely the Earnest Prof does not expect his metropolitan readers to give a rat's rear area about financial shenanigans in Ohio. We have Eliot Spitzer to keep an eye on - NYC is the Big Leagues of financial scandal, and all we want or need to know about Ohio is that Columbus is where the Yankees have a farm team.

So here is the Bold, Caffeine Enhanced Theory (and do not attempt this at home!) - this column can only be read as a subtly disguised Hillary-basher. The ominous warnings about the perils of one party rule, the cozy financial dealings - he is taking us to Arkansas.

And why might the Earnest Prof be so reluctant to board the Hillary bus? Well, he was passed over for a spot in Clinton I, and showed his characteristic warmth and good humor after his rejection, so he may be on the outs with the future Ins. Or he may be heeding the guidance of his colleague Brad DeLong, who parked himself in the "Anybody But HER!" camp two years ago.

Time will tell. But if the next three years bring more of these disguised Hillary hit pieces, I will stand ready to decode them!

Meanwhile, this column also embeds a deeper riddle, with a funnier answer. Krugman identifies by name the chairman of the coin dealing company, but skips right past the chairman of MDL Capital. Why?

Why indeed, when a bit of research tells us that MDL Capital was founded by Mark D. Lay? How often does heaven rain these delightful coincidences down upon the Earnest Prof? Here is a name that evokes both Ken Lay *and* Tom DeLay in a column bashing Evil Reps for financial scandals - can it get any better, and how did Krugman miss this?

I'm only guessing here, but what may have given the Professor pause is this:

Mark D. Lay, an Aliquippa native who built his MDL Capital Management into the fourth-largest minority owned asset management firm in the country, appeared to be riding high in 2003.

In June of that year, the politically connected and civic-minded Lay
was named Ernst & Young's Western Pennsylvania Entrepreneur of the
Year for financial services. Four months later, Gov. Ed Rendell and the
deputy premier of Bermuda joined Lay as he opened his firm's new
headquarters on Smithfield Street.

Not so evident at the time was the mounting pressure some investors
were putting on Lay and MDL, whose list of public and private clients
ranged from the National Basketball Association to Allegheny County.
Even as Lay offered in September 2003 to help the $14 billion Ohio
Bureau of Workers' Compensation fund reduce its exposure to an
anticipated rise in long-term interest rates, other clients were
dropping him for subpar performances.

...

Lay, named one of the Top 50 African Americans on Wall Street by Black
Enterprise Magazine, still lives in Aliquippa and teaches Sunday school
at Tried Stone Baptist Church.

His higher profile engagements include serving as a director of the
Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation, the Manchester Youth
Development Center, Howard University's School of Business, Beaver
County Head Start, and the Negro Educational Emergency Drive.

In the pension fund business where political ties frequently open doors to business, Lay had his share.

In Ohio, eyebrows were raised by the fact that MDL Capital's chief
compliance officer is Mildred O. Forbes, daughter of Cleveland NAACP
President George Forbes. The elder Forbes is also a member of the Ohio
Bureau of Workers' Compensation oversight board. George Forbes said
yesterday he will step down.

We're talking about personal payoffs: bargain vacations for the
governor's chief of staff at Mr. Noe's Florida home, the fact that MDL
Capital employs the daughter of one of the members of the workers'
compensation oversight board, and more.

I have not yet verified that Cleveland NAACP President George Forbes is a Democrat, but I'll go on a limb here and bet he is. In fact, as some Dems bitterly recall, there are almost as many Dems as Reps in Ohio (Almost!). I'm guessing this little fact, if disclosed, might have jarred Krugman's moralistic tale.

[UPDATE: RedState thumps this point - of the five commission members, two were Dems and one was an independent with strong union ties. Oh, those evil Republicans!]

I wish I were done, since it has been delightful so far, but Mark D. Lay sounds like a good man with an interesting defense, and one might have hoped that an economist such as Paul Krugman would weigh in on it.

All of MDL's fixed income products have made money and returned positive financial gains to its clients and investors consistently. In fact, with the exception of the MDL Active
Duration Fund. Ltd. in the State of Ohio, no fixed income client of MDL
has lost money since our founding in 1992. With regard to a
portion of our work with the Ohio Bureau of Worker's Compensation
("BWC"), MDL assumed a very specific and narrowly defined role to
deploy what is known as an "overlay strategy." That strategy is
designed to protect the overall fund against interest rate increases
that could diminish the value of the overall fund. A strategy of this
nature is a commonly accepted practice.

It must be maintained and understood
that an overlay strategy of this nature and magnitude is prudent when
protecting an overall fund valued at over $10 billion dollars."

More details are in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, and the Daily Kos. The gist - Mark D. Lay claims that his firm was running a hedge of Ohio's $10 billion bond portfolio. In Sept 2003, with the ten year Treasury ranging from 4.50% to 4.16%, Ohio was worried about rising interest rates (they were catching up to Krugman!). Last fall when the fund blew up, the ten year was around 4.20% to 4.03%. Using Fed Funds as a proxy for the repo rate, and seeing a range from 1% to 1.5% over the year in question, we will note that funding costs alone on a short position could exceed 2.5%.

So. might MDL Capital have lost $215 million by mimicking a short position in $10 billion of Treasuries? Yes. Was that what they contracted to do? Evidently, the state is saying no, MDL Capital is saying yes, and Paul Krugman is punting.

Too bad - throwing the Sinister Wall Streeters under the bus when deals go sour is a time honored tactic for municipal financiers across America, and that may be exactly what is happening in Ohio. If The Earnest Prof had made it to Update 2 when he read the Daily Kos, he might have delivered something stronger than his silly side-step.

MORE: More on Orange County and how County Treasurer Robert Citron was a genius until it all blew up, at which point he retroactively became a passive and compliant sheep led by unscrupulous Wall Streeters.

So Krugman writes: "Now, politicians and businessmen are always in a position to do each other lucrative favors."

And in todays paper I see: WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Halliburton Co. unit will build a new $30 million detention facility and security fence at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where the United States is holding about 520 foreign terrorism suspects, the Defense Department announced on Thursday.

So the Capitol Coin investment returned more than most of the rest of the portfolio and the owner profited as well? When has anyone involved with government investments not been a political player? The state invested and the agent did as he saw fit with the investment and this is different from other fund management how? One difference is the high rate of return. Would you rather have an investment that returned twentyfive percent with a fifth of the profits going to overhead or an investment that returned two percent with half going to overhead?
The other article smacks of racism by implying that minorities get political cover for misdeeds until they are too visible; then they are tossed out with the bathwater in order to obfuscate the real culprits. The fact that politics in our country corrupts those who indulge is not precipitated by one party control or ideology. It is a universal factor and abused best when citizens turn their heads and cough when the corruption is exposed because it's "Their Guys".

Irish - re Halliburton and Gitmo, at least the Administration has someone working there who has kept his sense of humor.

Now, if only Ken Lay can fly down for the ceremonial groundbreaking...

The other article smacks of racism by implying that minorities get political cover for misdeeds until they are too visible; then they are tossed out with the bathwater in order to obfuscate the real culprits.

So, will The Krug throw his support behind Gov. Schwarzenegger's push in another famously one-party state to wrest control of those big fat pension funds away from the political appointees and give them to the people?

Do you guys really think that prolonged one-party power is not going to lead to increased corruption? Does anyone honestly believe that? Given how in-line the whitehouse has the republicans in the senate and house, I mean, lets get real. One party-complete rule is bad whether its democratic or republican. You guys remeber "checks and balances", right?

George Forbes is a Democrat -- BIG TIME. He was president of Cleveland City Council for a number of years and effectively ran the city like, well, like Boss Tweed. Ironic, huh? Of course, such irony eludes Messr. Krugman.

Right. It specifically refers to the checks and balances established by the Constitution regarding the various powers granted the different branches of the federal government and state governments.

It doesn't mean, even slightly, checks and balances between political parties, which, some of us REMEMBER (catch the spelling), are not even mentioned in the Constitution, at all.

So, while you might have a debatable point regarding the potential for corruption in de-facto one-party states, your citation of Constitutional checks and balances as authority for your complaint is completely off point.

Tim, I'm not talking about specific checks and balances -- but the idea of "checks and balances". People didn't always believe that government, or people in charge, needed any form of check or balance. God was directing them personally, and they could do no wrong.

Why isn't Krugman worried about New Jersey?
I am from Pittsbugh, PA - a stronghold of
the Dems - city is bankrupt. Enought said.
He,who is sadly tenured at Princeton, should
be asked:
What's the Matter With New Jersey?

"The message from Ohio is that long-term dominance by a political machine leads to corruption."....Paul Krugman

I think I have decoded his Nobel Prize. Remember the boys from MIT that programed a computer to write scientific papers using proper jargon, equations, charts and graphs combined into nonsensical and totally incomprehensible jibberish? Two of these very "professional looking and sounding" papers were selected for publication.
No one understood them but they were accepted by scientific journals. Think that is how Krugman won the prize. Problem is that now that he must use the vocabulary of
the laity, his insanity is exposed.
Note: I realize that Nobel Prize committee
is composed of socialists, which would
give anything Krugman proclaimed an edge.

I think it says something that Ohio is undoubtedly the only state with a statue of a man with a briefcase in its capital. It was probably full of money.

However, having said that, Illinois has been a very corrupt state for a century or so, and it didn't have one-party rule very often. In Illinois we have always had equal opportunity crooks. Now, Chicago, that's different, but it was crooked when it was run by Republicans, too.

And the state of New York is corrupt. New Jersey is incredibly corrupt. I seem to remember Connecticutt has had its problems.

"And I will blog anonymously at my own site under the new title 'Just One Waffler' in order to steal typo-traffic from you."

If I ever do start a blog, JOW would be almost perfect name - waffling is the core of my political philosophy. And I'm sure the traffic would be there to steal - everyone loves hard-to-follow prose and arguments that come to no conclusion.

Anyway to add to the hard-to-follow (and clueless)comments I've made here, let me suggest that the "cryptic" quality of this Krugman column disappears instantly when you take into consideration "style."

Read the first paragraph carefully:

"For one thing, it's an entertaining story that seems to get weirder by the week. More important, it's an object lesson in what happens when you have one-party rule untrammeled by any quaint notions of independent oversight."

For those who have argued for the "two Krugmans" theory, it's clear that the first sentence was written by Dr. Paul, the economist, but the second sentence was written by alter ego Mr. Krugman. What can one say to the idea that object lessons are more important than weird, entertaining stories? A muffled scream, perhaps.

And once it turns out that the object lesson has the upper hand over the weird story, the column is basically over. It's no use protesting that all sorts of relevant details are being left out - these elisions are necessary to the effective expression of Mr. Krugman's style.

Hmm, is there anyway we can differentiate between Redstate.org and this Red-state.com when referencing them? It's certainly not a big deal by any means, it just bothered this caffiene enhanced mind. BTW, good post :D
-bro