Episodes

Article Info

Tagged as:

Can You Honor The Truth of Another?

Can you honor the truth of another? Can you sit with and have a conversation that tries to understand why someone believes differently than you? I was asked, “Bill, Do you spend equal time reading the positive sources as you do the critical?” here is my answer.

I need you to not only hear my answer but feel it? I have read the Book of Mormon over a dozen times all the way through and have read from its pages thousands and thousands of times. I have read the new testament and old testament deeply as well. I had read and thought about the teachings on those pages so deeply and was one who pondered the scriptures continuously. I read all the correlated materials. manuals, periodicals, LDS.org. I read and studied the institute manuals. I read “Our Heritage and “truth restored”, all of talmadge, Mcconkie, JFS, I read everything. I read the motivational guys like Wilcox, Millet, and so many others. Have you seen my LDS library. No doubt what so ever, I have read more faithful material than 99.9% of members as well as critical material in order to understand both sides. Are there folks who have read more. Sure but not many.

We like to point to critics as inaccurate. We like to say they intentionally deceive and share things out of context. But the fact of the matter is the institutional church is who is the most inaccurate about its story. It is the Church that witholds info most deeply, tells false faith promoting stories in more plenty, and whitewashes at every turn. Such is demonstrable. It is not even close. But because you know I am wrong and you are confident that you are right, you likely will avoid diving as deeply as I have. But to show just how inaccurate the Church has been take time to read a few books

Richard Bushman “Rough Stone rolling” – Bushman is a well respected faithful scholar. He is sought out by GA’s when they have historical questions and his book is as well a written book about Joseph Smith.

D. Michael Quinn – “Early Mormonism and the Magic World View” – Take a few hours to soak in just how much folk magic was involved in Joseph Smith and his family. Try to see how much our early church history is tied in knots with the Smith family practice of folk magic. When Quinn wrote these books he was a church historian working with Leonard Arrington. He was a professor at BYU. The guy knows his stuff.

D. Michael Quinn “Origins of Power” & “Extensions of Power” These two books will help you invariably see behind the curtain into the day to day behind the scenes operations of LDS Church leaders.

Grant Palmer “An Insider’s View of Mormon Origins” – This book will help you see what went into creating the Book of Mormon. it is a must read.

Start with those. If your serious about your faith, then take a few hours and set aside the story your church told you about itself and really get to know what our history really looks like.

The Church and its speakers have painted a picture that doubts can be resolved.

For every thousand members who have a faith crisis in the way I have, very very few put it back together. The problem is this. If the evidence was 50/50 (in favor of the Church being what it claims versus not) then most people could continue in faith. In fact what we want to be true often has more power in our thinking then what is actually true (psychological ideas like confirmation bias, belief persistance, and the backfire effect play deeply into how willing our brains are to let go of comfortable but false notions). In other words if the evidence were 50/50, people in the church want so bad for it to be true that the far majority would be able to continue in belief having faith, But the evidence is not 50/50. By the way this works the same way for members of other false religions as well. It is overwhelmingly against the Church’s narrative. So for every thousand people who dive deep into these issues, 95% of them or more lose confidence in the LDS faith. You don’t know these issues yet. And to be honest, it is pretty apparent that deep down you really don’t want to know these issues.

These issues are so messy and they take hours and hours to deconstruct the story the Church told you versus the truth, that one has to be serious about whether they really want to know and if they are willing to put the time in. It will take you years if you are voracious and decades if you do this in your spare time

Would you even do that with one issue among 5000 ? Let’s see

=====The Book of Abraham problem=====

Can you take the time to try to understand the issue.

Start with the Book of Abraham Gospel Topic essay.

Please openly acknowledge before you begin what the story was that the Church told you about this scriptural text. then see if you can see a shift in the essay

now there are 50 more articles to read but this will give you a start. Do you sense that the story is not what the Church originally claimed and now as the Church has retreated and concedes points that Joseph assuredly was not translating accurately the Egyptian and that the document is not what he claimed? Now take the solutions they give such as a missing scroll or a catalyst theory and try to be rational. Do you see the problems those have too? What is the most reasonable conclusion?

And now recognize there are 5000 other issues with just as much to read and understand and know the evidence is just as problematic on those. And yes I have read it. Have You? Can you see why folks like me who have read literally everything throw in the towel? The Church makes a whole lot more sense through the lens of being a fictional creation from a brilliant mind and all leaders after being old men who are thirty to forty years behind their time on social issues who have zero access to God magic. Once you try that lens on, it all makes more sense. We can all choose belief in it but can you sense such a choice becomes irrational and illogical for most who go down the rabbit hole.

If you want the other issues, read the Mormon Primer or CES Letter

But do you really want to know?
now sense that I have read every positive article and book on the Book of abaraham issue and I have read the critical argument on those 50 more that I mention. The critic has the more rational reasonable explanation and the problems are too big for my brain to overcome if I choose to be logical and rational. The Church does not have a satisfactory answer beyond “have faith” which if you can grasp that is that “have faith” is another way to tell someone to make space for the irrational answer rather than too accept the most logical rational conclusion. “Have faith” is irrational thinking knowing the evidence is against you.

now sense how much more there is to read that I have read and you and everyone saying “have faith” havent read. plus I read the footnotes and I chase sources down. I am always looking for the rational and logical explanation and I read everything, pro and con. I know these issues inside and out but as a believing member, you and others dismiss my knowledge because you have comfortable beliefs you want to maintain and you sense deep down just how much is at risk and the deep need to maintain belief even if the evidence is against your view.

I dare you to dive into this deeply. But please don’t do that if you sense the risk is too great or too uncomfortable. The truth is all that ever mattered to me. To anyone who says otherwise, they simply dont know me.

The Church would like you to think that most people who go down this rabbit hole, find a way to reconcile it. Thats not true. the far and wide majority who dive into this – step away. First they keep going trying to make it better and having the bare minimum as far as faith and belief. They try to gently move the church towards being better. But little by little it falls apart and the majority of them within 5 years leave. NOW are there a handful (percentage wise) who make it work and know the problems and maintain faith? SURE but also grant in the same breath, that every religion has such and having such does is not evidence nor should it be something one places confidence in. Lastly I share that most of these folks acknowledge more problems privately than they maintain publicly.

Let me know if you want another issue to study out. But trust me, not one facet of our story is the way the church taught it. But don’t take my word for it.

4 thoughts on “Can You Honor The Truth of Another?”

Bill, I love and appreciate your work. Unfortunately too many of all of us still believe everything from the Brighamite versions of history. If you can’t trust their answers and traditions passed down today then how can you trust their answers and journals in the past? As a seeker of truth I would recommend you and all reading this. Not only regarding the Carthage Conspiracy but everything about the secret chamber and spiritual wifery.

“123:6: The main spring of all corruption are the false traditions of the fathers who pass those false traditions on to their children.

In 1831 the LORD prophesied that a secret combination would rise up among the Saints. He called it “the secret chamber” (D&C 38:13 & 28). Its focus was spiritual wifery. It has led to the awful situation among the Latter-day Saints today, one described two times in the Book of Mormon (Mosiah 2:36-41; Ether 8:24). Besides addressing this darkness in D&C 38, God also provided a way to uncover it there. He called it an “endowment of power from on high,” one poured out upon the humble, prepared Saints at the dedication of the House of the LORD at Kirtland in 1836. It was the Holy Ghost, or having access to the unified mind of the Father and the Son (Lecture on Faith 5 ). Many of those with this important gift chose to not follow Brigham Young west. They included the remaining members of the Smith family. The reason was polygamy and the control and fear tied to “the new order of things” Brigham Young was putting in place. This book addresses how polygamy rose up among the Brighamite Saints of Utah, and how it led to suppression of the fuller portion of “the doctrine of Christ” in Mormonism. Because of the early focus on polygamy, too few Latter-day Saints make Christ the LORD their focus, instead inserting the church and its leaders as substitutes for Him. It has resulted in idolatry, ignorance of how to be saved, and widespread deception. One of the most significant lies is that the Prophet Joseph Smith practiced polygamy, instituting it among the Saints. It is a lie, put forth by Brigham Young and those following him, all to justify their practice of it early on. Many are leaving the church today because of this lie and other deceptions, all a part of a false history and narrative, which the Saints have been fed. Some of this is simply ignorance. Some of it reflects greater darkness. The result, however, is many problems among us as a people. It need not be so. Seeing our awful situation today, Moroni saw that we would be surrounded by secret combinations that control us, keeping us in ignorance and deception for the sake of “gain” (Ether 8:24). They control our government, corporations, schools, and churches. This control has led to a second “awful situation,” the one described by King Benjamin. He wisely brought his people out from under the lies, deception, and control of “false Christs,” “false prophets,” and “false preachers and teachers” (Words of Mormon 1:15). They used the people for gain (1 Ne. 22:23). The “awful situation” among King Benjamin’s people was remaining in sin and ignorance without redemption (Mosiah 2:36-41). This is exactly where too many Latter-day Saints find themselves today. Many believe they are “saved” because of their works and our temples, when they are not. Few know what redemption is, or how to obtain it. Thus, many are unprepared for the great last-days harvest of souls that is nearly upon us (D&C 45:2, 56:16; Jer. 17:11). The Prophet Joseph taught that we cannot be saved in ignorance (D&C 131:6). We must “awake” from our slumber, our “awful situation” and “arise,” that we might go forth to meet the Bridegroom.” He Christ the LORD. He is coming soon.”

What a pleasure to hear truth. Truth led me out. Knowing the real Jesus exposed the counterfeit mormon Jesus and from there learning about Joseph Smith and how wicked he was made the rest collapse quickly,like 2 weeks. Since truth is more important than tradition, I felt free of a hurtful dogma that had caused me pain since I learned of polygamy. Joseph had it on his mind the whole time, since he left a loop hole for it in the chapter he wrote in ‘Jacob’. Like you somewhat, I was hoping to help or change things from the inside. Not possible. I wish I could help those like me who feel drawn to Christ. But fortunately there are people like you and your line up of great podcasts.

Great episode, Bill. I have to disagree with you on one minor point. You said that Early Mormonism and the Magic World View was a “quick read.” It is a great book, but it took me some time to get through it. Probably because I kept going back and forth between the text and the sources, in the back half of the book. 🙂

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your Message:

Your Name*

Your Email*

Testimonial

I think Bill’s podcasts must have some magic spell on them because my husband listened to a few today and said he agreed with “pretty much everything”. His response was like getting what I wanted on Christmas morning. Thanks Bill.

Angela R.

Contact Mormon Discussions

To contact a specific podcast host or to contact the podcast generally please email MormonDiscussionsPodcasts AT gmail DOT com
Thank you for reaching out!!!

Helpful Resources

Find us On Facebook and Twitter

Support the Podcast and Donate Today

At Mormon Discussions we look to help you navigate Mormonism. Please consider donating today to support our effort to provide Latter-day Saints the tools and resources and the safe space for conversations to navigate a difficult and often lonely faith transition. Donate today to a good cause while supporting Latter Day Saints like you! Your Donation is 100% tax deductible.

Support the Podcast through your Amazon purchases

Please consider making your Amazon purchases through their charity site https://smile.amazon.com and designating Mormon Discussion as your charity of choice. Please click below to get started.

Featured Links

Requested Legal Disclaimer by the LDS Church

Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.

The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.

Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:

Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.

News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.

Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.

Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.

Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.