Instagram

Our lost brother

This morning I was called by one of my best friends from Belgium. He wanted to share his thought with me: the East, he had concluded, is not geographical place, but it is rather the symbolic representation of our desire for the mystical. When I was in China this summer, I was wondering wether it would be possible to come to a fundamental difference between the people who are living on the Western side of the Eurasian continent and the people at the Eastern side.

To answer this question I believe we have to find recurse in transcendental history. Transcendental history is not the description of history as we know it has actually happened, but it is the history of everything which must necessarily have happened, although we have no archeological or scriptural sources to prove it. For example, 50.000 years ago, women must have given birth to children now and then. We have neither the material nor the scriptural sources to warrant such a claim, but nevertheless, we know if must have happened.

Another one of this transcendental historical moments is the moment when the human population wondered off into two distinct directions. If we follow on the assumption that the human species “came out of Africa”, their migrations must have come to a decisive point somewhere around Mesopotamia. You could imagine a tribe with two visionary brothers – or sisters, or a brother and a sister – who argued about the best way to proceed. This must have truly been the hyperintelligent, learned and powerful members of the human tribe. Their debate necessarily concerned the following: what should we do: should we continue our movement in the direction of the sun, or will we move away from the sun?

It is very inspiring to consider people from the West as “abendlandische” people, while the people of the East are the people of the countries where the sun is born. It must have been phenomenologically intimidating and existentially disturbing to watch this ball of fire take its course through the blue sky every day. Is this sun something we desire for, or something we are afraid of? The answer to that question most essentially defines the difference between the people of West and East.

Today, I have the opportunity to meet my lost brother or sister. Though our bodies are new bodies and did not take part in this crucial decision for mankind, our genes are still the same. Therefore, I can now ask my lost brother or sister: why did we fight? Why did you decide to go the other way? What was it that attracted you towards the sun? And do you maybe also remember why I was so scared of the sun? The answer to those questions need to be found in the distant past, so a regression through my body is necessary. But there must be a trace left and it must be possible to find this trace. Through this inquiry, we will be able to find the necessary conditions for a reconciliatory embrace.

If a group divides in one part directing Sunrise and one part Sunset, both groups do carry their DNA configuration. If the group is divided in equal numbers and the DNA is well mixed, they could share the same configuration. But if the split is not in the same numbers, the same configuration, the same moment one can doubt about that.
Besides that these groups are split for many centuries. Do have different experiences in time, food, climate. Their epigenetic response will be different. And they will encounter other types of the Homo branch. Denisova’s, Neanderthals, Erectus maybe. For the last one see the article in Guardian on 18th dec. See also the Homo from Flores, the Homo of Eugene Dubois. Svante Swaabo makes a clear suggestion of possible interbreeding of all these forms. Occuring at different moments, and different places. So europeans are carrying more DNA from Neanderthal, Asians do have more Denisovan information. So also in time our DNA experience will not be the same and the outcome a little bit distinctive.
Some people suggest if you want to face the most original Homo sapiens, look for the aboriginals. And their ways of expression.