Was WWII Worth It?

For Stalin, yes

by Patrick J. Buchanan

In the Bush vs. Putin debate on World War II,
Putin had far the more difficult assignment. Defending Russia's record in the
"Great Patriotic War," the Russian president declared, "Our people not only
defended their homeland, they liberated 11 European countries."

To ascertain whether Moscow truly liberated those lands, we might survey the
sons and daughters of the generation that survived liberation by a Red Army
that pillaged, raped, and murdered its way westward across Europe. As at Katyn
Forest, that army eradicated the real heroes who fought to retain the national
and Christian character of their countries.

To Bush, these nations were not liberated. "As we mark a victory of six decades
ago, we are mindful of a paradox," he said:

"For much of Eastern and Central Europe, victory brought the iron rule of
another empire. V-E day marked the end of fascism, but it did not end the oppression.
The agreement in Yalta followed in the unjust tradition of Munich and the Molotov-Ribbentrop
Pact. Once again, when powerful governments negotiated, the freedom of small
nations was somehow expendable. … The captivity of millions in Central and Eastern
Europe will be remembered as one of the greatest wrongs in history."

Bush told the awful truth about what really triumphed in World War II east
of the Elbe. And it was not freedom. It was Stalin, the most odious tyrant of
the century. Where Hitler killed his millions, Stalin, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, Pol
Pot, and Castro murdered their tens of millions.

Leninism was the Black Death of the 20th century.

The truths bravely declared by Bush at Riga, Latvia, raise questions that too
long remained hidden, buried, or ignored.

If Yalta was a betrayal of small nations as immoral as the Molotov-Ribbentrop
Pact, why do we venerate Churchill and FDR? At Yalta, this pair secretly ceded
those small nations to Stalin, co-signing a cynical "Declaration on Liberated
Europe" that was a monstrous lie.

As FDR and Churchill consigned these peoples to a Stalinist hell run by a monster
they alternately and affectionately called "Uncle Joe" and "Old Bear," why are
they not in the history books alongside Neville Chamberlain, who sold out the
Czechs at Munich by handing the Sudetenland over to Germany? At least the Sudeten
Germans wanted to be with Germany. No Christian peoples of Europe ever embraced
their Soviet captors or Stalinist quislings.

Other questions arise. If Britain endured six years of war and hundreds of
thousands of dead in a war she declared to defend Polish freedom, and Polish
freedom was lost to communism, how can we say Britain won the war?

If the West went to war to stop Hitler from dominating Eastern and Central
Europe, and Eastern and Central Europe ended up under a tyranny even more odious,
as Bush implies, did Western civilization win the war?

In 1938, Churchill wanted Britain to fight for Czechoslovakia. Chamberlain
refused. In 1939, Churchill wanted Britain to fight for Poland. Chamberlain
agreed. At the end of the war Churchill wanted and got, Czechoslovakia and Poland
were in Stalin's empire.

How, then, can men proclaim Churchill "Man of the Century"?

True, U.S. and British troops liberated France, Holland, and Belgium from Nazi
occupation. But before Britain declared war on Germany, France, Holland, and
Belgium did not need to be liberated. They were free. They were only invaded
and occupied after Britain and France declared war on Germany – on behalf of
Poland.

When one considers the losses suffered by Britain and France – hundreds of
thousands dead, destitution, bankruptcy, the end of the empires – was World
War II worth it, considering that Poland and all the other nations east of the
Elbe were lost anyway?

If the objective of the West was the destruction of Nazi Germany, it was a
"smashing" success. But why destroy Hitler? If to liberate Germans, it was not
worth it. After all, the Germans voted Hitler in.

If it was to keep Hitler out of Western Europe, why declare war on him and
draw him into Western Europe? If it was to keep Hitler out of Central and Eastern
Europe, then, inevitably, Stalin would inherit Central and Eastern Europe.

Was that worth fighting a world war – with 50 million dead?

The war Britain and France declared to defend Polish freedom ended up making
Poland and all of Eastern and Central Europe safe for Stalinism. And at the
festivities in Moscow, Americans and Russians were front and center, smiling
– not British and French. Understandably.

Patrick J. Buchanan was twice a candidate for the Republican presidential
nomination and the Reform Partys candidate in 2000. He is also
a founder and editor of the new magazine, The
American Conservative. Now a commentator and columnist, he
served three presidents in the White House, was a founding panelist
of three national television shows, and is the author of seven books.

Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
without written permission is strictly prohibited.
Copyright 2016 Antiwar.com