Democracy is often contrasted with tyranny. There are
many variants of tyranny, but whether the label is authoritarianism,
totalitarianism or dictatorship, the theme is that decisions are made by one
group of persons and imposed on the rest of the population. Tyranny is
objectionable when those decisions serve to enrich and protect the tyrants
against the interest of the collective whole. Then again, tyranny is
sometimes justified because democracy (or the rule of the mob) was proving to be
dysfunctional and an elite regime of national salvation was needed.

It is fine to sell democracy against the evil alternative of
tyranny. But how does democracy work in practice? Democracy is
usually sold in the ideal form of equality in which all citizens have a
voice. In practice, one cannot have 20 million eligible persons vote on
every decision, major or minor. That is why elections are held in which
candidates state their positions on various issues and the voters choose those
candidates whose positions that they like best. Inevitably, there are some
compromises in that no candidate may reflect one's preferences on all of the
issues and one will simply have to choose the best fit. The worst case
scenario is one in which none of the candidates are acceptable. As a
Buenos Aires taxi driver said, "Here we have two parties: the thieves and
the incompetents. They are eating up Argentina."

In a free market democracy, such large-scale discontent should
eventually lead to the emergence of new political parties and politicians who
can respond to those needs. Unfortunately, in today's world, democracy
does not work in a frictionless manner. Political campaigning nowadays
require huge amount of money and resources and therefore, the 'best' candidates
may be severely handicapped against the entrenched political machines who are
aided by special interest groups. In this atmosphere, it is no surprise
that people feel helpless.

We will now cite some data from the TGI Argentina study.
This is a survey of 5,946 persons between the ages of 12 to 75 years old
conducted during 2001. Within this survey, the respondents are shown a
statement "There is little that I can do to change my
life." In total, 34% of the respondents said that they either
'completely agree' or 'somewhat agree' with this statement. We note that
this statement contains many possible elements, from the personal (e.g.
marriage) to the public (e.g. economy), but at this moment in the history of
Argentina, political economy must be the grandest single issue.

The TGI Argentina survey was conducted during the early
part of the year 2001. The full political crisis of going through five
presidents in a brief period of just 13 days would occur at the end of the year, some months after this
survey was completed. Nevertheless, the signs of that crisis has been
evident for quite some time. An economic recession had been going on for
four years with no end in sight, unemployment was holding steady at around 20%
and a debt default seemed all but inevitable. All the remedies and fixes
did not inspire any confidence that the problem was going to be resolved.

In the next chart, we show the responses broken out by the
response to the consumer confidence question in the TGI Argentina
survey. It is no surprise to find that the sense of helplessness is
highest among those who have seen their economic condition deteriorate in the
past 12 months and those who expect that economic condition to deteriorate in
the future.

The sense of helplessness is also expected to be different
according to the life stage. When one is young, there is still the
possibility of pursuing a completely different course of life. In the case
of Argentina, anyone can see the long lines of visa applicants at foreign embassies
in Buenos Aires. For an elderly person, there are fewer degrees of freedom and
flexibility. Worse yet, at this moment, one's savings and pensions may be
erased as banks accounts are frozen while a devaluation is being contemplated.

In the next chart, we show how the responses vary by age and
gender. Just as we guessed, the response are lowest among persons 20-24
years old and highest among those who are 55 or more years older.

In the next chart, we show the responses broken out by
socio-economic level and education. The sense of helplessness is highest
among the less educated poor, who have the least amount of financial resources
and human capital.

But while some individuals and groups can be
oppressed and disfranchised by other individuals, groups, social institutions
and cultural contexts, they have the potential to empower themselves in order to
be liberated. There is no law of nature that dictates that some groups
must be subservient to others. The uncertain thing is the exact process by
which this happens (or does not happen). Karl Marx's third thesis on
Feuerbach was:

The materialist doctrine that men are
products of circumstances and upbringing, and that, therefore, changed men are
products of other circumstances and changed upbringing, forgets that it is men
who change circumstances and that it is essential to educate the educator
himself. Hence, this doctrine necessarily arrives at dividing society
into two parts, one of which is superior to society (in Robert Owen, for
example).

The coincidence of the changing of
circumstances and of human activity can be conceived and rationally understood
only as revolutionising practice.

The manner by which things change may be
surprising and unexpected. In the case of Argentina, there was no obvious
solution to the festering crisis. Nevertheless, in December 2001-January
2002, two presidents were ousted because a large portion of the population went
out into the streets, banging their pots and pans to voice their
displeasure. The chronology of events was:

December 20, 2001: President Fernando de la
Rua resigns after riots

December 23, 2001: Adolfo Rodriguez Saa was
sworn in

December 30, 2001: Adolfo Rodriguez Saa
resigns after more street protests, against the economic policies and now
also against the apparent composition of his cabinet, which included
politicians who are perceived to be corrupt. Under the constitution,
the presidency was passed to the Senate leader Ramos Puerta, who declined on
grounds of ill health. The presidency was then passed on to the
congressional leader Eduardo Camano, who did not have the votes to continue.

January 2, 2002: Eduardo Duhalde was
elected as President by the Congress in a special session.

The situation was very similar to the People
Power revolution in which Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos was ousted in a
matter of days by mass demonstrations in 1986. While it is by no means clear that the fifth
Argentine president Eduardo Duhalde would be the savior, there will always be the awareness
of the power of the people. As a sign written on the sidewalk across Casa
Rosada says, "We are going to keep on coming. Signed, The
People."