Several people pointed me to a new update from CCTV containing a full 360-degree panorama around the Chang'e 3 lander. This is very cool, but my interest in it is tempered by the poor quality of the images being shared. We're looking at a video camera's recording of the panorama being projected on a wall screen. The video camera is in nearly constant motion, introducing motion blur. The resulting recording has then been uploaded onto a video sharing service. This sad panorama has been compressed and recompressed and blurred and distorted so many times that I'm sure that what you can see by playing the video below does no justice to the original data. That's too bad, because it looks like such a cool landscape, with bright blocks of rock sticking out of darker lunar regolith, made even more cool by the presence of a rover in it! I waited all day to post this in the hopes that a better version would come out somewhere, but it hasn't, so here's the video. (This version has been encoded one more time by being uploaded to Youtube; the original is marginally better.)

In other Chang'e 3 news, Xinhua reports that the rover roused today from its noontime "siesta," a few days earlier than originally planned. The rover hibernates over the high temperatures of lunar noon and cold temperatures of lunar night.

Finally, an interesting update from the LADEE mission. They are very surprised to report no detection at all of any signal in any of their instruments from the Chang'e 3 landing. Project Scientist Rick Elphic does a great job of explaining the non-detection, so I'm just going to repost it below.

Much of the world was watching the Chang'e 3 landing in northern Mare Imbrium at 13:10 UTC Dec. 14, 2013. NASA’s Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) was watching too.

In the evening of Friday, Dec. 13, Pacific Time, LADEE controllers uploaded a command sequence that scheduled the science instruments for operations during the Chang'e 3 landing period. LADEE's science instruments gathered data on the dust and gas species before and after the landing to provide the science team with a comparison.

The Neutral Mass Spectrometer (NMS) was running in a mode that would allow it to monitor native lunar atmospheric species, as well as those resulting from Chang'e 3's propulsion system. These combustion products were known to include diatomic nitrogen, water, diatomic hydrogen and several other species. The two other LADEE science instruments, the Lunar Dust Experiment (LDEX) and the Ultraviolet-Visible Spectrometer (UVS), ran in their normal configurations. Together they are able to detect ejected dust and gas species from a propulsion system, provided these products could make the long trek to LADEE's position, which was far from the Chang’e-3 landing site.

LADEE's retrograde, near-equatorial orbit never goes beyond approximately 22.5 degrees north and south latitude. Chang'e 3's landing site was far to the north of LADEE’s path, at 44.12 degrees north and 19.51 degrees west. At the time of landing, LADEE was orbiting over a different part of the moon east of the Chang'e 3 path, at 21.77 degrees south latitude and 82.17 degrees east longitude - more than 3,400 km (2,100 miles) away.

At 13:41 UTC, about 30 minutes after the Chang’e 3 landing, LADEE flew over 19.51 degrees west longitude. At this time, LADEE was still more than 1,300 km (800 miles) to the south of the landing site. The NMS had started exosphere observations at 13:22 UTC and would continue for 55 minutes as LADEE sped across the lunar sunrise terminator and into lunar night. The UVS had performed atmospheric scans one orbit previous (LADEE's orbit period is about 2 hours), around 12:15 UTC, and would do so again later. The LDEX was operating normally, recording dust impacts prior to, during and after the Chang'e 3 descent.

Surprisingly, the LADEE science teams' preliminary evaluation of the data has not revealed any effects that can be attributed to Chang'e 3. No increase in dust was observed by LDEX, no change was seen by UVS, no propulsion products were measured by NMS. Evidently, the normal native lunar atmospheric species seen by UVS and NMS were unaffected as well. It is actually an important and useful result for LADEE not to have detected the descent and landing. It indicates that exhaust products from a large robotic lander do not overwhelm the native lunar exosphere. As the descent video shows, the interval of time that dust was launched by the lander is very short, perhaps less than 15 seconds. LADEE would probably have had to be in just the right place at the right time to intercept it. Also, significant amounts exhaust products apparently cannot migrate to large distances (hundreds and thousands of miles) and linger with sufficient density to be measured. We can compare these results to theoretical predictions of gas and exhaust plume particle ejecta, and update our understanding of the interaction of lander propulsion systems with surface materials. In many ways, this has been a very useful experiment!

Comments & Sharing

3

Comments

R: 2013/12/20 06:45 CST

Important to note that on December 13 and 14 - the Sun had a large coronal hole which was geoeffective and produced a solar wind which created auroras at high latitudes here on Earth. That solar wind should have been sweeping the Moon's surface at the same time Chang'e3 was landing. Did LADEE's analysis team correct for solar wind contribution to their instrument readings?

yimingleon: 2013/12/21 05:35 CST

After I saw the news that Chane'e 3 'released' the panorama picture of the landing site, I've been trying to search for the original data, both in English and in Chinese, neither succeed. My guess here include an interesting story (purely my personal guess, no guarantee to be true): several years ago, when Chang'e 1 really released its picture over the lunar surface, some amateur compared it with the NASA archive, and pointed out there's a misplacement in splice, this became a quite big news and some embarrassing (I was among the first to witness that guy revealing the mistake, since that's done on my favourite astronomy forum). The result is, although Chang'e 1 was generally regarded as a success, but the PI was criticised and haven't been interviewed for a quite long period. He's still the PI for the following Chang'e series, and now he's back to public, a good news for him. And I guess the one thing they learned from that embarrassing experience is: never release the original data, and if you release a data, release a blur one so that no geek can point out any mis-splice.