Generally speaking, however, Aerial Trams are (relative to Gondolas) an out-dated mode of Cable-Propelled Transit. Compared with Gondola technology, Aerial Trams exhibit longer wait times between vehicles; lower line capacity; an inability to turn corners; and little potential for intermediary stations.

Ironically, Aerial Trams are on average more expensive than Gondola technology despite their numerous short-comings. They are a high-cost, low-value technology.

Aerial Tram

Funiculars, on the other hand, are very similar to Cable Cars except Funiculars are used almost exclusively to ascend steep inclines. In fact, you’ll often find Funiculars referred to as Inclined Rails.

The incline of the vehicle is equivalent to the incline of the bottom-supporting guideway while standing and seating areas are at a flat incline relative to the horizon.

hi! Nice updates. I was thinking if it was possible to give more insights on the cost variations , advantages and disadvantages between different technologies used in hill/mountain cities. I'm a student currently pursuing a study on various technologies applicable for these special terrain cities(thesis) Would be really grateful if you could give me more details :)