“When
the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head the crown offered him by Europe he
will become patriarch of the world...
The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of the Universe, the Patriarch of the
International Church.” (Protocols 15.23; 17.4)

In his book, Practical
Idealism, Count
Richard
Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder of the International Pan European Union, wrote that
the Jews were predestined to be a “future leader-nation” and a “new race of
spiritual nobility.”

“The main representatives of the corrupt as well as the upright brain
aristocracy: of capitalism, journalism and the literate are Jews. The
superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of
the future nobility. One look at the history of the Jewish people explains its
lead in the struggle over the governance of humanity. For two thousand years
Jewry was a religious community, made up of ethical and religious predisposed
individuals from all nations of the classical cultural area, with a national
Hebrew centre in Palestine.

“Instead of destroying Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated
this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection
process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into
a spiritual nobility of Europe.

A new Noble Race by the Grace of the Spirit

“Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility
through spiritual grace... The prominent position held by Jewry these days is
owed to its spiritual supremacy which enables it to win the spiritual battle
over enormous superior numbers of favored, hateful, jealous rivals.” (Practical
Idealism, Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, 1925)

Coudenhove-Kalergi’s words echoed the Protocols of Zion, which were signed by “the Representatives
of Sion of the 33rd degree.”

“PER ME REGES REGNANT.
‘It is through me that Kings reign.’
And it was said by the prophets that we were chosen by God Himself to rule over
the whole earth. God has endowed us with genius that we may be equal to our
task.”
(Protocol 5.6)

“God
has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of the dispersion, and in this
which appears in all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength,
which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world.”
(Protocol 11.8)

“In
this difference in capacity for thought between the GOYIM and ourselves may be
clearly discerned the seal of our position as the Chosen People and of our
higher quality of humanness, in contradistinction to the brute mind of the
GOYIM. Their eyes are open, but see nothing before them and do not invent
(unless perhaps, material things). From this it is plain that nature herself has
destined us to guide and rule the world.”
(Protocol 15.11)

The
reader will notice in the Protocols the reference to “Goyim,” which is a derogatory Yiddish term for “non-Jews.”

“n. Offensive., pl. goy·im (goi’ĭm) or goys.
Used as a disparaging term for one who is not a Jew
Yiddish, from Hebrew gôy, Jew ignorant of the Jewish religion, non-Jew.” (Answers.com)

The above quoted Protocol 15, Section 11 reveals the ‘Learned
Elders’
contempt for non-Jews. In their view, Jews have a
“higher
quality of humanness, in contradistinction to the brute mind of the GOYIM. Their
eyes are open, but see nothing before them...” Why
do the Jews have a higher quality of human life than the Gentiles?
The Goyim “eyes
are open, but see nothing before them.”
The expression is an allusion to
“second
sight” or
“clairvoyance,”
which is the supernatural
power of seeing objects or actions removed in space or time from natural
viewing.”
(“Clairvoyance”) Those
who are enlightened or illuminated also receive instructions from “spirit entities,”
i.e., fallen angels (Lucifer and his demons), who, in exchange for their souls, confer
upon them supernatural power to perform magic.

To prepare the Jews for their destiny as rulers of the world, the Learned Elders
have mainstreamed the Kabbalah, the sourcebook of their occult doctrine,
throughout Jewry. Kabbalah
has made great inroads into North American Jewry where interest in Jewish occultism has risen
dramatically.

“…A more traditional
American Orthodox rabbi, Aryeh Kaplan, spent the seventies and early eighties
reconstructing the forgotten Jewish meditative tradition by researching
long-neglected kabbalistic texts, many only extant in manuscript. He boldly
disregarded the centuries-old rabbinic ban on the dissemination of kabbalistic
practices among those under forty and unschooled in Bible and Talmud—a
result of the
Shabbetai Tzvi
tragedy—by
teaching Jewish meditation classes and publishing practical manuals and source
readers on the subject. Thanks largely to Kaplan’s efforts, many Orthodox rabbis
and lay people have taught and written about Kabbalah, recognizing its appeal to
non-practicing Jews searching for spiritual guidance.”
(Michael Sidlofsky, “Kabbalah—A
Brief History”)

Since the
unenlightened Gentiles are unfit to govern their own lands, the Learned
Elders must consolidate and rule over the nations of the world. Their
megalomaniacal plan was obstructed when the ‘anti-Semitic’
Vichy regime banned Masonic societies, and so they renamed their program the
Synarchist Movement of Empire (S.M.E.) after the 19th century Synarchist
movement founded by Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves
d’Alveydre
(1842-1909)
who had been the Grand Master of the Martinist Order.

“The
Vichy regime legislated against Freemasonry, and co-operated with the Germans in
identifying and acting against Masons. But, even within the regime itself,
people were very doubtful that Freemasonry had genuinely been banished. In the
so-called ‘Chavin
Report’,
which seems to have originated from within or near government circles,
allegations were made that large number of people in responsible positions
belonged to Masonic political groups called ‘synarchist’
which had been in existence since the 1920s. These synarchists were supposed to
have been inspired in part by the doctrine of Saint-Yves d’Alveydre.
They were represented as a group of influential politicians, businessmen, and
so-called ‘technocrats’
who had been plotting to seize power ever since a reputed ‘Synarchist
Revolutionary Pact’
of 1922.’”—Peter
Partner, The Murdered Magicians (Secrets
of the Knights Templar: The Modern Merovingian Connection: Vichy France)

And so, it
was
“under a
sophisticated Catholic disguise they called Synarchy,”
that the Judeo-Masonic societies banned by the Vichy regime launched the Pan
European movement.

“The new book
‘The
Sion Revelation: The truth about the guardians of Christ’s Sacred Bloodline’
by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince states in the conclusion: ‘Yet
as we have seen from dozens of checkable associations and links, it seems that
at least the concept of the European Union is the product of an occult
conspiracy, inspired by individuals who believed they were in contact with
spirit entities, with the ultimate aim of establishing a full-blown United
States of Europe in line with Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre’s original
vision.’

“The
heart of the book zeroes in on ‘The
Rectified Scottish Rite’ —
not the Scottish system of the U.S. but a different, highly esoteric
system. This
makes sense according to professor Hugh B. Urban’s article on French Freemasonry
and full-lotus yoga meditation. The leaders of this order depend on channeling higher spirits.”(“Synarchy:
Beyond Left and Right”)

According to Masonic authors, Lynn Picknett and
Clive Prince, Synarchy is a
theocracy ruled by secret societies whose enlightened initiates receive
their instructions from spiritual intelligences.

“[Schwaller
de Lubicz] also always concealed the influences that shaped his own philosophy,
but an examination of his ideology places him firmly in the context of a
specific politico-esoteric system, a movement known as Synarchy. This is ‘government
by secret societies’,
or by a group of initiates who operate from behind the scenes. It is an analogue
of ‘theocracy’,
or rule by a priesthood. Schwaller de Lubicz was a fervent Synarchist which is
why he admired ancient Egypt so much, ruled as it was by divine kings and
priesthoods...”
(The
Stargate Conspiracy, p. 263)

The
Pan European Union was a front for Synarchy, whose larger objective was world
government. The
Synarchists claim that Agarttha is
“the underground
headquarters of the King of the World.”
According to one source “...there are
Aghartans who have reincarnated on earth in our day in order to bring us their
science, their organization and their form of government: government by
Initiates.”
(On
Synarchy)

From Foucault’s Pendulum:

“Because if the Masters of
the World exist, they can only be underground; this is a truth that all sense
but few dare utter. Perhaps the only man bold enough to say it in print was
Saint-Yves d’Alveydre. You know him?”

“He is the one who told us about Agartha, the underground headquarters of the
King of the World, the occult center of the Synarchy,” the taxidermist said. “He
had no fear; he felt sure of himself. But all those who spoke out after him were
eliminated, because they knew too much.” (On
Synarchy)

The writings of Saint-Yves d’Alveydre
revealed Agarttha to be, not an underground location, but “a
Trinitarian unity and Synarchy of Judeo-Christians”
with its roots in the “Jewish School of Alexandria, seeking by means of
unification, through many Judœo-Christian sects, to dominate and secretly rule
the Western World.” In other words, Synarchy, which according to Webster,
means “joint rule or sovereignty,”
is a Judeo-Christian theocracy ruled by Jewish Elders:

“Having read Mission de
l’Inde en Europe, Mission de l’Europe en Asia, written in 1886 by Saint-Yves
d’Alveydre, we are led to conclude that is more or less symbolic, that Agarttha is of no one country, of no one nation, but universal; that the
hierarchy is, apparently, a group of cabalistic and gnostic magi and initiates,
having links with the Jewish School of Alexandria, seeking by means of
unification, through many Judœo-Christian sects, to dominate and secretly rule
the Western World and eventually unite the East with the West; that in all
probability the mysterious subterranean libraries merely consist of what is
known as the ‘Akashic
Records’—akasa
meaning ether, which according to these initiates has imprinted upon it all
past, present, and future world happenings...

“In support of our opinion
of the nature of Agarttha we quote from the above book by Saint-Yves d’Alveydre.
He explains that ‘the
name of Agarttha signifies impossible to be taken by violence and inaccessible
to anarchy.’In itself he says it is a Trinitarian unity and Synarchy of Judeo-Christians, as
opposed to ‘general
government by brute force, that is, military conquest, political tyranny,
sectarian intolerance, and colonial rapacity.’Everywhere to-day it looks as if an attempt were being made to rule the world by
some such Synarchic hierarchy of men, politically, religiously, and economically.

“It was Agarttha too ‘who, at the beginning of modern times, everywhere renewed, through the
Judeo-Christians, the thousands of associations developed today under the name
of Freemasonry. As Schuré wrote: ‘The
tradition of esoteric Christianity, properly speaking, is directly and
uninterruptedly attached to the famous and mysterious Manes, founder of
Manichœism, who lived in Persia in the fourth century.’ This sect arose out of
the Jewish School of Alexandria.

“‘Synarchy!
Synarchy! Synarchy! thus save your tiaras, your universities, your crowns, your
republics, all that is yours, all, including what was legitimate in the
Revolution of 1789 in its social promises, that the Synarchy Judœo-Christian
alone can maintain and accomplish. Unite in that Law, teaching bodies,
ecclesiastic or laie; juridical bodies; economic bodies.’”
(The
Trail of the Serpent, pp. 313-315)

Saint-Yves d’Alveydre,
who was a Kabbalist, owed his concept of Synarchy to the Kabbalistic Order of the Rose
Cross, whose leaders were in communication with the “Masters
of the Occident,”
— the
Ascended Masters of the Hierarchy channeled by Alice Bailey.

“Papus,
as a witness and participant in the birth of other British Rose+Croix currents
of origin...wrote this about the Kabbalistic Order of the Rose-Cross :

“‘The
Rose+Cross movement would have continued in silence, and been isolated from
other initiatory organizations, if foreign occultists had not claimed to bring
it out of France which was a the place of birth of the Western traditions—at
its origins, to involve it in a movement which was to change the axis of
gravitation of esotericism; to place the center of gravity of the movement
outside of Paris [...] It would have been a sacrilege to allow the work of the
Masters of the Occident to be destroyed. Thus, it was decided (high up in the
organization) that a movement of diffusion would be undertaken, which was
intended to select by work and by examination those initiates who would be able
to adapt the esoteric tradition to the century that lay before them.”...

“The
following generations of French and European occultists perpetuating the
initiatory traditions and of the mysteries of Occident were largely influenced
by this unique school. Such was also the case...for Saint-Yves d’Alveydre
[1842-1909] and his concept of ‘Synarchy’
and for Rudolph Steiner.”
(Ordre
Kabbalistique de la Rose-Croix)

The legendary
founder of the Rose Croix, “Christian
Rosenkreutz,” was the main character of the Rosicrucian manifestos. The
third manifesto, The Chymical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz, is an
allegorical romance depicting the spiritual marriage of Christianity and Jewish
Cabalism—called
by the oxymoron “Christian Cabalism” in the Middle Ages. The Rosicrucian
manifestos heralded the restoration of the “true Christianity” based on a right
understanding of the Holy Scripture which could be attained by means of the
Jewish Cabala. The envisioned Synarchy would be a Judeo-Christian theocracy
based on Cabala/Kabbalah, as depicted also in Francis Bacon’s
Atlantis. (See: “Christian
Cabala”)

What Christians are not told is
that the
Synarchist theocracy calls for a highly organized state with a rigid two-caste system
governed by a predestined “enlightened
elite,”
the Jewish priest-kings, whose claim to authority is that it “is in direct
contact with, and receives its instructions from, the spiritual intelligences
that rule the universe—rather
like the theocratic pharaohs of ancient Egypt, who were both secular rulers and
intermediaries between the gods and the people.”

“Saint-Yves’s concept of synarchy was essentially a reaction to the rise of
anarchy and therefore the opposite—a highly ordered method of government based
on what he believed were universal laws and principles. Everything and
everybody had its place and purpose; harmony is achieved by keeping to that
place and fulfilling that purpose, whereas any circumvention of those natural
laws leads to disaster. Everyone has to remain in his or her allotted station in
life. (Papus likened the individual’s relationship to a nation or race to the
cell’s relationship to the body. As each was preordained to fulfill a specific
function, attempting to do anything else would only cause problems for both the
individual and the organism as a whole.)

“His
works outlined an ambitious, visionary program for establishing synarchy in
France and beyond. Each state must be highly organized at every level, with
everyone in his or her own specific place; otherwise anarchy would triumph.
Challenging one’s status would not be tolerated.

“However, the concept that everyone has a preordained place and role means that
some people are naturally intended to lead: in other words, Saint-Yves
advocated government by a predestined elite. And although much of his work is
about the practicality of applying synarchy to the government of society, at its
core it is an essentially spiritual or mystical philosophy. The elite is
spiritually attuned to the universal laws—effectively a priesthood. Synarchy is
therefore a form of theocracy, rule by priests or priest-kings.

“Synarchy even suggests that this enlightened elite is
in direct contact with, and receives its instructions from, the spiritual
intelligences that rule the universe—rather
like the theocratic pharaohs of ancient Egypt, who were both secular rulers and
intermediaries between the gods and the people. Saint-Yves himself believed he
was in contact with invisible forces. But as Andre Ulmann and Henri Azeau point
out in their 1968 Synarchy and Power (Synarchie et pouvoir),
ultimately such elites are always self-selected.” (The Sion Revelation,
pp. 338-339)

In the Synarchist theocracy of enlightened Jews ruling unenlightened Gentiles,
social mobility will be nonexistent.

“The
Goyim...do not see the urgent necessity of what we, when our kingdom comes,
shall adopt at once, namely this, that it is essential to teach in national
schools one simple, true piece of knowledge, the basis of all knowledge of the
structure of human life, of social existence, which requires division of
labor, and, consequently, the division of men into classes and conditions.
It is essential for all to know that owing to difference in the objects of human
activity there cannot be any equality... After a thorough study of this
knowledge, the peoples will voluntarily submit to authority and accept such
position as is appointed them in the State.”
(Protocol 3.10)

Behind the Synarchist conspiracy was the high cabal, the Prieuré de Sion, and
its front, Alpha Galates, whose enlightened initiates directed the political
movement for the Pan European Union.

“The
‘Knight Beneficent of the Holy City’ is the highest grade and is another name
for the Templars.

“‘We
were utterly astounded to discover that Schwaller de Lubicz and synarchy
led us right back to the same groups — including the Martinist Order and the
Knights Beneficient — which we had already identified as being behind the Priory of Sion.
So we were intrigued to find that not only had Jean Cocteau and Schwaller
de Lubicz corresponded for many years but Cocteau had stayed with the Lubiczes
at Luxor during a tour of Egypt in 1949.’*

“It’s
well documented in the book that the Synarchist Conspiracy of the 1940s in
Europe was also the main force for a United States of Europe.
‘Here we have two politicians, instrumental in creating the first step
toward the EU, one of whom (Schuman) had belonged to a think tank organized by
Louis Le Fue [sic]of Alpha Galates,
and the other (Monnet) who had been involved in the preward synarchist
milieu.’ Mitterand is considered a protégé of Monnet.” (“Synarchy:
Beyond Left and Right”)

*Prieuré de Sion Grand Master from 1918-1963,
Jean
Cocteau, and French Freemason and Egyptologist, Schwaller de Lubicz,
a protofascist who influenced the Nazi Party.

Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves
d’Alveydre,
who founded the Synarchist movement in the 19th century and was Grand Master of
the Martinist Order, was a
friend of Victor Hugo, who was Grand Master of the Prieuré de Sion from 1844 to
1885.
The membership of
the Martinist Order were from “High
Industry, the High Finance, and the Aristocracy”
Strategically placed, the Synarchists were “in
positions of power to take over the three key institutions of social control:
political, religious and economic.”

“The
founder of Synarchy, a Frenchman named Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre
(1824-1909), explained that the term was the opposite of anarchy. Whereas
anarchy is based on the principle that the state should have no control over
individuals, Synarchy proposes that it should have complete control. He proposed
that Synarchists achieve power by taking over the three key institutions of
social control: political, religious and economic. With its own members in
positions of power, the Synarchists would, in effect, secretly govern entire
states. And why stop there? One of the aims of Synarchy, from its very
inception, was—from
the words of a Synarchist document—the
creation of a ‘federal
European Union’.
Is it any coincidence that we are now moving rapidly towards such a European
state.”(The Stargate Conspiracy, p. 263)

Part II: Financial Vampires documented
that the goal of British Intelligence MI6 operations was to establish a European
Union controlled by multinational corporations. Also that MI6 collaborated with
First National Bank of Chicago whose President was Gaylord Freeman, the
President of First National Bank of Chicago and Grand Master of the Prieuré de Sion from 1963 to
1981.
The Synarchists were not only high initiates of the Synagogue of Satan, their
occupations were heads of industry, financiers and bankers. They were/are the
modern Knights Templars who were the Jewish bankers of medieval Europe.

“The Synarchist
movement is an international movement born after the Versailles Treaty, which
was financed and directed by certain financial groups belonging to the top
international banking community. Its aim is essentially to overthrow in every
country, where they exist, the parliamentary regimes which are considered
insufficiently devoted to the interests of these groups and therefore, too
difficult to control because of the number of persons required to control them.

“S.M.E. proposes
therefore to substitute them by authoritarian regimes more docile and more
easily maneuverable. Power would be concentrated in the hands of the CEO’s of industry and in designated
representatives of chosen banking groups for each
country.” (“Synarchy
Movement of Empire”)

The existence of the Synarchist conspiracy
is documented in mainstream sources.

“In his new popular
history, The Collapse of the Third Republic (New York, 1969, pp. 237-38),
William L. Shirer credulously assigns the Synarchy a ‘considerable’
role in undermining the [French] Republic.” (“The Legend of the Vichy Synarchy,”Richard F. Kuisel,
French Historical Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3 (Spring, 1970), pp. 365-398)

“...the
following statement by one of the leading globalist strategists, Mr David
Rockefeller, published in 2002... As will be seen, David Rockefeller
acknowledges that he is part of a secret cabal (synarchy) which works against
the best interests of the United States:

“‘For
more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political
spectrum have seized upon well-publicised incidents such as my encounter with
Castro, to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim
we wield over the American political and economic institutions. Some even
believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the
United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’
and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global
political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge,
I stand guilty, and I am proud of it’. (David Rockefeller, ‘Memoirs’, Random
House, New York, 2002, page 405.)”
(“Banksters
and Officials Tightening Own Noose”)

AYN RAND
/ “THE
TRUST”

Alexandre Kojève
(1902-1968) was
born in Russia and emigrated to France. He was
a leading figure in the Synarchist conspiracy and in the creation of the
European Union. In
the 1920s, Kojève was
the leader of a group of Russian emigrés in Berlin and Paris
who supported the Bolshevik Revolution, which was financed by the Warburg
banking family which also funded Count Coudenhove-Kalergi who co-founded the Pan
European Union. The Synarchist, Alexandre Kojève, spent most of his life in France where he “worked
in the French Ministry of Economic Affairs as one of the chief planners of the
European Common Market.”

“Kojeve...secured
a job in the Direction des relations economiques exterieures, and for the next
twenty years, he was according to everyone who worked with him the
eminence grise of French economic policy. He was involved in diplomatic
events and treaties whose significance continues to define our century. After
helping to implement the Marshall Plan, he was involved in promoting the
European Economic Community (now the European Union).”
(Gallery
of Russian Thinkers)

Alexandre Kojève was “an
eminence grise (French for ‘grey
eminence’)—a powerful advisor or decision-maker who operates secretly or unofficially.”
He was also a
Russian spy for the “Soviet
secret service project called ‘the
Trust.’”

“Saint-Yves’ successor, Gerard Vincent Encausse (‘Papus’),...

“Both
Saint-Yves and Papus envisioned a global Synarchist empire, divided into five
geographic areas: 1. the British Empire; 2. Euro-Africa; 3. Eurasia; 4.
Pan-America; 5. Asia. Indeed, Alexandre Kojève is identified in Russian sources
as a leader of the so-called ‘Eurasians,’
a group of Russian emigrés in the 1920s Berlin and Paris, led by Sir Samuel
Hoare’s
Guchkov and tied into the Soviet secret service project called ‘the
Trust.’
The ‘Eurasians’
welcomed the Russian Revolution as a purgative force to wipe out corrupt Western
civilization. Kojève’s own cosmology of great tyrants counted Josef Stalin and
Adolf Hitler as second only to Napoleon, in achieving the ‘end
of history’
goal of a true global tyranny.” (“Synarchism: The
Fascist
Roots of the Wolfowitz Cabal”)

According to a CIA file, “The Trust”
was a controlled opposition stealth
operation whose purpose was “penetration
and manipulation of anti-communist Russian groups in exile, from 1922 to 1927.”
(United
States. Central Intelligence Agency typescript: The Trust)
The modus operandi of the Jewish Elders of Sion is to preempt their opponents by
neutralizing any and all opposition to their schemes. For example, they
neutralize opposition to Communism by posing as anti-Communists and through the
creation of front organizations achieve control over genuine anti-Communists
who might organize against them. A good example of this a controlled-opposition
front is the John Birch Society, which was founded by
Communists.

The tentacles of “The
Trust”
extended far beyond Europe, even to the United States. Another Russian emigré
was Ayn Rand, the Jewish atheist who arrived in the United States in 1926, the
same period that the Russian agent,
Alexandre Kojève,
emigrated to France.

“‘Rand’
was born Alisa Zinov’yevna Rosenbaum in St. Petersburg, Russia, in 1905...
‘Ayn
Rand’
came to America from Russia presenting herself as if a radical anti-Communist.
Hers was the typical modus operandi of Bolshevik operatives working for an
official Soviet organization known as
‘The
Trust’.
These agents, many of them crypto-Jews, came to the West in search of
anti-Communists and infiltrated anti-Communist organizations and Western
intelligence agencies. Their objective was to forward the interests of Communism
by creating a controlled opposition to Communism which would serve the interests
of the Communists while pretending to fight them. They also subverted all
authentic anti-Communist movements.

“Rand
promoted negative stereotypes of women, attacked homosexuals, advocated laissez
faire Capitalism, and taught selfishness and disregard for humanity. She opposed
charity and objected to any governmental assistance for those without means. She
wanted to place America on the ruinous Gold Standard.

“Rosenbaum’s
‘good
advice’
to the blacks only held them back by preventing them from using the political
process to forward their interests. Her good advice to the Goyim only held the
Gentiles back, by making them selfish and irresponsible, and also by preventing
them from using their government to better themselves and their neighbors. She
taught the Gentiles to hate the poor, undermine the middle class and concentrate
wealth in the hands of the wealthiest Jews, all in the name of ‘fighting
Communism’.
Her ‘good
advice’
pitted Goys against one another at the time when they should have been helping
one another to become successful. She taught Gentiles to shun any efforts to
cooperate in their communities and improve the lot of one another.

“While
Jews famously provided communal support and charitable assistance for their own,
Rosenbaum helped to create the destructive ‘me
generation’
attitudes in Americans, which undermined the good nature of Christianity,
weakened communities and inhibited the advancement of the poor and middle class.
Her beliefs also fostered the drug culture, pornography and the destruction of
public education. While Jews promoted strong community ties, Rosenbaum taught
the Goyim to be selfish and ‘independent’,
meaning without any sense of social responsibility or communal cohesion.

“While
Jews wisely took from the public schools all they could, Frederick T. Gates, an
agent of World Jewry, used Rockefeller/ Rothschild money to finance institutions
of higher learning which benefited Jews, while promoting the idea that Gentile
students should be readied for factory work and work as field hands and farmers.
While World Jewry took the monies they stole from Gentiles and distributed them
charitably to their own, Rosenbaum taught Gentiles to abandon all social
responsibility, obsessively focus on themselves, and destroy all government
institutions which better the lot of the American middle class and poor.

Ayn Rand authored the popular books, The
Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Readers unfamiliar with these tomes
can listen to
Rand’s
1959 interview with Mike Wallace
in which she expounds her philosophy of “Objectivism”
and
“rational self-interest.”
Before an American audience, Rand disparaged God and Christianity, promoted
Marxist atheism and unbridled capitalism wherein the pursuit of self-interest is
the highest virtue. Rand redefined morality as the individual’s
pursuit of his own happiness to the exclusion of others’
needs, while condemning altruism and charity as immoral because the recipients
are unworthy, or they would help themselves and refuse help from others. One
only need to listen to Ayn Rand to recognize that her philosophy is the
fountainhead of the
self-absorbed and atheistic “Me
Generation,”
as well as the uncharitable self-interest that defines much of the Conservative
movement.

“This
know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be
lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient
to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false
accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors,
heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of
godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.” (2 Timothy
3:1-5)

A byproduct of Ayn Rand’s
philosophy of rational self-interest is class warfare, a major theme of Communist
agitators. Today, the strident rhetoric of Conservative TV and radio hosts who
daily vilify Liberals and pander to the self-interest of their Conservative
viewers only serves to widen the economic and social chasm between the rich and
the poor. Ayn Rand was a Synarchist, in the mold of Saint-Yves d’Alveydre,
whose paradoxical ideology proposed to eliminate class struggle by reducing
mankind to slavery under a ruling elite.

“Saint
Yves d’Alveydre...was determined to find a political formula that could lead to
a more harmonious society. Synarchy in opposition to Anarchy. A European society
ruled by three councils representing the economical power, the executive power
and the spiritual power, that is, the churches and the scientists. An
enlightened oligarchy through which class struggle could be eliminated.”
(Umberto Ecco, “The
Pendulum of Foucault”)

Ayn Rand framed her thesis as a false dichotomy
between socialism and capitalism, liberal and conservative, a dialectic which
has been perpetuated by the mainstream media. This left-right dialectic has
obfuscated the reality of a criminal Jewish cabal that conspires to destroy
mankind.

Within Ayn
Rand’s inner-circle named
“The
Collective” was Alan Greenspan, the future Chairman of the Federal Reserve
Board.
Greenspan studied economics under the tutelage of future Federal Reserve chairman
Arthur Burns, who was instructed by Ludwig von Mises at the Rockefeller-funded
New York University. While Alan Greenspan belonged to
“The
Collective” he was also the Chair of President Gerald Ford’s Council of Economic
Advisors.

“Rand’s
magnum opus, the 1,100-page Atlas Shrugged, was published in 1957... The
theme of Atlas Shrugged is ‘the role of the mind in man’s
existence—and, as a corollary, the demonstration of a new moral philosophy: the
morality of rational self-interest... she formed a group (jokingly designated
‘The Collective’)
which included future Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan... [O]n March 6, 1982,...Rand’s funeral was attended by some of her prominent followers,
including Alan Greenspan.” (“Ayn
Rand”)

“The Collective” was no joke. Ayn Rand, who launched the anti-communist
propaganda campaign in the U.S., was, in reality, a Communist agent commissioned
to destroy the moral values and the economy of the United States.

The von Misians who are her disciples are also controlled opposition agents.
Ayn Rand’s teachings on
laissez faire capitalism were the teachings of Ludwig von Mises and
the Austrian School, the Mont Pelerin Society, the Eugenics Societies, and the Chicago
School, as well as the Republican and Libertarian Parties.

“The New York Times journalist Henry Hazlitt and his wife had been friends of
Rand and her husband even before her success with The Fountainhead, and
in the 1940s Hazlitt introduced her to the Austrian School economist Ludwig
von Mises. Both men expressed an admiration for Rand, and, despite her
philosophical differences with them, Rand strongly endorsed the writings of both
men throughout her career.

“She has also had an influence on a number of notable people in different
fields. Examples include philosophers such as John Hospers, George H. Smith,
Allan Gotthelf, Robert Mayhew and Tara Smith, economists such as George Reisman
and Murray Rothbard, psychologists such as Edwin A. Locke, historians
such as Robert Hessen, and political writers such as Charles Murray.
United States Congressmen Ron
Pauland Bob Barr, and Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United
States Clarence Thomas have acknowledged her influence on their lives, and
former United States President Ronald Reagan described himself as an
‘admirer’ of Rand in private correspondence in the 1960s.” (“Ayn
Rand”)

“The founding members [of the
Mont Pelerin Society] included [Friedrich von Hayek’s] teacher von Mises, his
close friend and colleague at the LSE, the philosopher Karl Popper, and
some famous economists of what came to be known as the Chicago School,
including Frank H. Knight, and the Nobel Laureates Milton Friedman and George
Stigler.” (F.A.
Hayek)

“The
Objectivist philosophy of Ayn Rand was referred to earlier. Although as
unacademic as Popper was academic, Rand did share with him a number of
philosophic premises; such as dedication to metaphysical realism, opposition to
conceptual realism, and rejection of determinism and subjectivism. Indeed
Wallace Matson has suggested that Rand and Popper had ‘much in common.’ His view
has been partially endorsed by Robert Hollinger, who has written of ‘parallels’
between the two thinkers.” (R.
Hollinger, ‘Ayn Rand’s Epistemology in Historical Perspective,’ in The
Philosophic Thought of Ayn Rand, D. Den Uyl & D. Rasmussen Eds. (Urbana,
Ill: University of Illinois Press, 1984), p. 56.) (“A
Critique of Karl Popper’s Critical Rationalism”)