RE: Plenum Volume vs runner length vs RPM /torque ranch

Would the KopCoat and Devcon 2-Ton be suitable to raise the floor of an exhaust port as in the 351C 4bbl head? If I did this would I realize any power gains over port plates that have tonques that block the lower portion of the port? These heads will be used on a street car with 4spd and 4.11+ gears. If you need more engine details I could give them.

RE: Plenum Volume vs runner length vs RPM /torque ranch

Thanks, Let's move over to the intake port. Ford's have allways been weak on the exhaust so let's just use the port plates on the exhaust. On the intake how about using a two barrel intake and use the epoxy on the intake side of the head to match the intake manifold. I'm sure you realize I'm trying to increase the velocity and decrease the volumn of the 351C 4bbl head's intake runner. I'm trying to increase port flow for low end torque and streetability.

RE: Plenum Volume vs runner length vs RPM /torque ranch

I feel comfortable using the epoxy. What are the limits of the build up per application using the product you spoke of. More important do you feel it would be a worthy endeavor on these heads modifying the intake port. I would think it would have to help.