Saying PU to the EU

Choosing liberty over socialism

n the end, after all the brave
and bright words, they did nothing. This is fortunate for Western
Civilization.

European politicians had promised that they would revolutionize the
European Union at their recent meeting in Nice. Luckily, they didn't —
or, better, they couldn't. Americans tend to think of European
unification as a harmless cause — something to reduce tariffs and to
keep France and Germany from starting wars with each other. But far
from creating a true free-trade zone, the EU has become a very serious
aggressor against civil liberty in Europe.

Most European politicians today tell their constituents that Europeans
need yet another level of government — the EU superstate — in order to
improve their wealth and unleash their human potential. On the other
hand, the great German economist Wilhelm Roepke stated that the
European tradition has always followed the path of liberty and
decentralization. Central planning, big government, and domestic and
foreign interventionism would be contrary to the truest and deepest
spirit of Europe. One of the most important reasons that Europe was
able to leap ahead of the rest of the world in the Renaissance and
after was because many European governments were less intrusive and
rapacious than their counterparts in other areas of the world, and
were less threatened by technological and social change.

In
the past, Europe was a patchwork of thousands of colors. After the
birth of the nation-states, the colors mostly vanished and only a few
could be distinguished. The Euro-enthusiasts are now willing to have
one gray hue that hides the infinite differences between both
individuals and peoples on the continent.

Those who oppose the European Union — the Euroskeptics — have said all
of these things for a long time. Finally, even the mainstream press
has begun to recognize they were right.

Right now, the European Union Commission requires the unanimous
consent of all its member states to take action. The Nice meeting was
supposed to replace unanimous consent with majority rule. France,
Germany, and Italy pushed for majority control, but the smaller
nations refused to submit.

The European Union Parliament is elected by the people, but the real
power resides in the European Commission, whose members are nominated
by national governments. The Commission's regulatory bureaucracy is
already imposing its will, and increasing the burden of government, on
people all over Europe. Majority rule for the EU Commission would have
worsened the problem; in practice, it would have been even easier to
force the Franco-German vision (not exactly a formula for limited
government) on the whole continent.

If
majority rule had been adopted, it would have soon led to something
very close to a dictatorship. The bureaucracy would virtually be a
tyrant, with intrusive regulation its most powerful weapon. Moreover,
when government and decision-making processes are centralized,
corruption costs are at their lowest and there is no respect for local
diversity.

If
the aggressive promoters of European integration were to gain the
majority, Europe would become even more socialistic than it already
is. This is the real reason why European libertarians and most
conservatives have been so happy with the failure of the Nice meeting.
Of course this hasn't stopped European politicians' hunger, and nobody
believes that the EU has taken a knock-out punch. But the politicians
will be forced to run a little more slowly than before, and may begin
to understand that, although people don't love national sovereignty,
free individuals hate any kind of supra-national sovereignty even
more. They will fight any attempt to establish it above their
shoulders and without their consent.

The defense of national sovereignty against the European Union is not
a sign of chauvinism. It is the only path Europe can follow in order
to avoid socialism. While the European Union is growing socialist,
many individuals and the communities on the continent have chosen the
path of liberty. They will fight the Leviathan with every means, in
defense of their own lives, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

Make a donation to support Dave Kopel's work in defense of constitutional
rights and public safety.

Nothing written here is to be construed as
necessarily representing the views of the Independence Institute or as an
attempt to influence any election or legislative action. Please send
comments to Independence Institute, 727 East 16th Ave., Colorado 80203. Phone 303-279-6536. (email) webmngr @ i2i.org