Ozuma – 05

After giving it some thought, I believe Ozuma can be best compared to a flag on a pole. Curiously random, yes. Madness, not quite.

Think about it for a moment. The series revolves around the Earth, so the ground can be considered representative of the story. You have Gido and Bainas, whose interactions bring each episode to heights it couldn’t have reached otherwise. Combined with the fact that each of the respective Captains fly under a different flag so to speak, the two are naturally representative of the flag portion of the analogy. Meanwhile, the pole itself is something that people don’t quite pay (or need to pay) attention to, but it’s still vital in that it serves as a structural feature that keeps the flag up by connecting it solidly to the ground. Sam is that pole. It can be argued that without him, we wouldn’t get all those great battle scenes between Gido and Bainas, as well as little plot movement. At the same time though, it can also be said that the things that Sam have done until this point haven’t been noteworthy, and in fact may have detracted a bit from the story. Thus, Sam the pole, is the vital aspect that connects the plot (the ground) and the exploits of the two Captains (the flag). Yet, his immature actions make him someone that gets left in the dust in the grand scheme of things and make him not worth paying much attention to. But hey, when was the last time you looked at a flagpole and said: “Wow, that’s such a cool pole!” (Don’t answer that.)

Not so crazy now am I!? Jokes and analogies aside, you have to say that some of the things I’ve said above aren’t quite farfetched. Gido and Bainas are indeed the highlight this episode once again, giving us Wild West standoffs, demonstrations of how negotiations should go, and some generally cool poses to top it all off. We also get the obligatory de-masking scene, which while expected, was still fun to watch and also served as an event that further developed Bainas’ character. It’s been nice seeing the build-up of her stoic armor these past few episodes and we always knew there was another side to her, but to actual see it was quite the treat.

On the other hand however, we have Sam, who seems content continuing his immature actions this episode. His failed Metal Gear style infiltration set up the plot development that followed, but it makes me wonder if the series wouldn’t be better if it focused on Bainas as a protagonist instead. In a way, it seems that even Maya might be a slightly better main than Sam. Her actions haven’t quite been noteworthy up until this point either, but it’s clear from this episode how crucial a role she plays in the overall story. Not to mention, she was the one who kicked started the story to begin with. How her interactions with Ozuma will save the world are still up in the air, but it’s no doubt that we’ll see how it happens in the culminating episode next week, and I know I’m definitely eager to see how everything wraps up. It hasn’t been quite the awesome ride a masterpiece might have been, but Ozuma’s still been worth watching every week, and has a few memorable characters to boot.

On a bit of a side note, I have to say that the Zone wasn’t quite what I thought it was at all. I suppose I should have expected this though, considering that I’m a science major and know that such a lake is a scientific possibility, even in a devastated world such as Ozuma’s. Regardless, the reveal was quite something, and some kudos have to be given to Gonzo for creating some pretty spectacular backdrops for most of the episode.

Regarding your Pole analog, I don’t suppose any flag pole are so visible as Sam in this episode. Maybe we could take Sam out and have Mimay fall for Maya, some quality Yuri hum?

Jokes aside, I was slightly disappointed that Bianas only recognise Dick after the mask off. But I suppose that wasn’t very important. Bianas’ emotional armour hasn’t come off completely this episode yet. Judging form the preview it will eventually next week.

I just hope they wouldn’t over do it so that her intellectual capability also drop a notch next episode. There is the danger of them pulling that so that Sam could shine through.

Yeah, I thought so too: these guys don’t seem to be trying too hard in making Sam a likable character. It just happens that we see the plot unfolding through his optic, which makes sense to a degree. Heck, Maya isn’t the most spectacular heroine either, but all the mystery surrounding her is definitely interesting.

I get that, but it’s still no excuse for how poorly they’ve executed things here; they’ve completely failed at creating a sympathetic dynamic protagonist for all the reasons that I mentioned last week. They also failed to realize that immature actions are doubly (significantly more) annoying in shows with more mature premises such as this one- you can get away with some blatant immaturity in a shounen jump series, but in a mature seinen show you really need to justify and minimize that immaturity because it sticks out like a sore thumb against the show’s dominant mature under/overtones…

So basically you’re saying that milquetoast sells?
I’m sorry but I just don’t buy this. From what little I can recall of my psychology classes, I’m pretty sure people do not like seeing mirror reflections of themselves (this is going by the anime studio’s assumption that every shounen viewer is a RL milquetoast) in stories. We could take it a level further with those shounen romance stories. I’m confident that any real life male, no matter how much of a loser, would never put himself through the level of public embarrassment most of the milquetoast’s jump into.

With regards to the show, I personally don’t think Sam’s that bad. Maybe it’s because he’s a kid surrounded by adults. His voice actor ain’t doing a great job, though (no offense if it’s someone well-respected). He’s nowhere near as annoying as that Occult Gakuen fellow, for starters.

DISCLAIMER: I re-emphasize that I actually like this show; my opinions as an impartial critic are pretty much in line with those of Zephyr, the author of this post. For the purposes of entertaining the discussion on this board that is skewed towards a certain negative aspect of the show, what I write here will also follow in that direction. But it is by no means representative of my opinions of Ozuma as a whole…

What I meant to say is that this is what they attempted to do; I meant that they attempted to front a shounen protagonist in Ozuma to give it some mainstream appeal, but couldn’t quite get a grasp on how to do it properly in a more mature, seinen context. (I qualify “mature” since there are immature seinen series too.)

Which is why I said that it was “no excuse for how poorly they’ve executed things here.” I meant exactly what I said; I meant that I understand why they chose to go with Sam as the protagonist in spite of the fact that clearly, other characters such as Bainas are far more interesting. They did it because they wanted to tap into the predominant anime-viewing demographic, that is, shounen. (I don’t think anyone can convincingly argue against the fact that the world of Japanese manga and anime in general is dominated by shounen series and shows; shows in the vein of One Piece and Naruto are by far the most popular, and the most abundant.)

Clearly they were trying to tap into a portion of this massive audience by going with shounen-archetype Sam as the main character. That in of itself isn’t a bad thing. It only becomes bad when you don’t have what it takes to pull it off.

With regards to the show, I personally don’t think Sam’s that bad. Maybe it’s because he’s a kid surrounded by adults.

It’s certainly arguable that he isn’t really all that bad. Sam’s childish, immature character is something of an alien in Ozuma’s intricate and grown-up world. He is essentially your traditional, impulsive, idealistic battle-shounen protagonist (Think Naruto) forcibly thrust into a premise that he has no business being a part of in his generic form. Ozuma’s team either didn’t know how, or didn’t put any effort into reconciling their dynamic young, idealized shounen protagonist with the world that they put him into. So what we get is Sam, a character whose impulsiveness and reckless idealism clashes irreconcilably with the sensible, realist/ic under/overtones that dominate Ozuma’s world, thereby incessantly annoying viewers. As to how one should go about reconciling a character like Sam with a world like Ozuma’s, please refer to what I wrote over in last week’s post…

So basically you’re saying that milquetoast sells?
I’m sorry but I just don’t buy this. From what little I can recall of my psychology classes, I’m pretty sure people do not like seeing mirror reflections of themselves (this is going by the anime studio’s assumption that every shounen viewer is a RL milquetoast) in stories. We could take it a level further with those shounen romance stories. I’m confident that any real life male, no matter how much of a loser, would never put himself through the level of public embarrassment most of the milquetoast’s jump into.

I never meant to say milquetoast sells. Clearly, self-reflection is not the reason why shounen shows are so successful; rather, shounen stories are successful because of the ideals that they exemplify- the actual personalities of the characters, milquetoast or not, are merely a precursor to this appeal. Shounen stories, and shounen protagonists are in no way an accurate representation of reality. Your typical battle-shounen protagonist smites evil with powers that draw from a mixture of self-righteous idealism, tenacity and friendship- simple values that everyone holds dear. And I can think of nothing that is more appealing to the masses than to have the things they believe in reaffirmed through an epic (if unrealistic) tale of evil being defeated by little more than these values + some pixie dust.

Of course, the real world is nothing like the universe of a battle-shounen manga. The tenacity of the poor often does very little in the face of oppression by tyrants, friendships are plagued by jealousy and betrayals, and idealism is very often the seed of evil itself, for the road to hell is indeed paved with good intentions. The worlds depicted by mature seinen shows like Ozuma, while by no means accurate depictions of reality, are far closer to it in comparison to the universes of shounen series like One Piece and Naruto. The worlds of mature seinen shows are so far removed from the idealistic shounen ones that in many cases, they might even be said to sit on opposite ends of the realism spectrum; so different that the kinds of characters that inhabit each world are not interchangeable without contextual adaptations. This is what Sam essentially is; he is a cookie-cutter shounen protagonist thrust into a mature seinen world with little to no contextual adaptations applied- which is why so many find him to be insufferable.

Ozuma’s writers/Leiji clearly chose to use Sam as the main character because they wanted to capture some of the battle-shounen protagonist’s idealistic, energetic, youthful appeal, which would hopefully translate into more sales for their little six-episode niche show. But what they failed to realize is that a shounen protagonist’s qualities, in of themselves, are not what makes shounen shows so appealing. (Which in turn explains why so many series with decidedly milquetoast protagonists are so popular.) Rather, the appeal of shounen lies in the interaction of such a character with an equally unreal, idealistic world that is in harmony with his nature; a perfect world where evil never triumphs, and morality is black and white. This interaction serves to reaffirm society’s morals, and its default sensibilities about things like good and evil- which is why it is so massively appealing.

A Naruto-like battle-shounen protagonist loses most or all of this appeal when he is placed into a mature and more realistic seinen world like that of Ozuma without contextual adaptation. A typical shounen protagonist in his traditional, cookie-cutter form is essentially an alien in a mature, (relatively) realistic world like Ozuma’s because the world-interaction from which he is supposed to derive his appeal is impossible to attain in such worlds; he is no longer in an idealized universe where he can solve every problem through nigh-literally doing nothing else but acting on his idealistic impulses. Reaffirmation does not occur; in fact here the youthful idealism of the shounen protagonist will tend to be contextually denounced; therefore, the shounen protagonist loses his appeal and devolves into a childish annoyance, an alien whose naïve ideals have no place in this realist/ic world of adults. Not that reconciling these kinds of characters with mature worlds is impossible, though- contextual adaptation through means such as sympathetic justification can actually make for very appealing young idealists at times, even in the most mature of settings.

I fully understand the kind of mass appeal that Ozuma’s writers were trying to capture by fronting Sam as the protagonist, but clearly they failed to realize that the appeal of shounen protagonists is not inherent to these kinds of characters; rather, it arises from the interaction of these idealized heroes with worlds that are equally idealistic; vacuums within which their black-and-white, absolute ideals about morality and right and wrong can thrive; worlds that they are at home in. Placing a shounen protagonist into a mature, (more) realistic world like Ozuma’s in his cookie-cutter form, with little to no contextual adaptation is pure folly; you are essentially making a maladapted alien the center of a world in which he is not equipped to thrive…

But I don’t think this kind of putting mass appeal into niche shows has any prospective of working at all. A niche show appeals simply because its niche, putting in mass appealing elements diminishes it.

But I don’t think this kind of putting mass appeal into niche shows has any prospective of working at all. A niche show appeals simply because its niche, putting in mass appealing elements diminishes it.

You can either be mass or niche, not both.

What is defined as “Niche” is a certain category of shows that are designed to appeal to a certain arbitrary category of audiences. Conversely, what is defined as “Massively appealing” is a certain category of shows which are designed to appeal to just about everybody in general. And then there is everything in between. The absolutes of “Niche” and “Massively Appealing” are merely human constructs used to enhance our understanding of this concept called “appeal” in general. The reality is that what we define as “Niche” and “Massively appealing” are simply extremes that exist at opposite ends of a wide and varied spectrum.

What makes a “Niche” show; what makes a “Massively appealing” show? We would tend to attribute qualities that are frequently present in the high extremes to “massively appealing” while qualities that are common in the low end of the spectrum are attributed to “niche” shows. While there are certain qualities might justifiably be considered as integral characteristics of both kinds of shows, no one can say with a straight face that any one of these elements is absolutely essential to make a “massively appealing” or “niche” show. Even things that may be important 99.999% of the time are not important 100% of the time; you will always be able to find rare, outlying instances where a show clearly belongs in a certain category, but does away with one or more of what is considered to be its group’s “core” elements.

And then we arrive at the squishy, amorphous middle of the normal distribution bell-curve (Assume, for the sake of argument that it is a bell curve since there have hardly been any studies on this matter; even if it is a skewed distribution like the income bell curve, it does not change the fact that it is a kind of spectrum of degrees) where most shows lie; the reality is that most shows are at neither extreme; they are neither “Massively appealing” nor “Niche.” Instead they contain elements of both categories, and as a result of this, their level of appeal never reaches the heights of shows on the extreme high end of the spectrum,- but neither does it ever fall to the abysmally low level of “Niche” either. In terms of general appeal, they are decidedly average.

You are right in saying that by contextually adapting Ozuma so that Sam fits in (Or, conversely, contextually adapting Sam so he fits into Ozuma, or by doing anything in between), we might fundamentally change the nature of the show so that it no longer falls into the low-extreme end of the appeal bell-curve, which essentially brings it out of the “Niche” category. But more likely than not, it isn’t going to bring an idea that was originally so very “niche” all the way to the other high, “massively appealing” end of the spectrum. In most scenarios it will instead move Ozuma closer to the middle, into a position where it is neither “Massively appealing” nor “Niche,” a point on the disproportionately large camel’s hump where most shows inevitably lie, whether by the intention of their creators, or not. And moving the show out of the low-end of the appeal spectrum successfully will inevitably translate into a (relatively) larger audience, which will in turn produce more sales for a show that was deemed to be so risky that they wouldn’t even give it a full cour…if it works, that is, which clearly, it did not…

Really been enjoying this show and love the visuals and the soundtrack, it’s so good seeing Matsumoto’s character designs again in a new science fiction anime.

As already mentioned, Bainas is pretty awesome.

Also, on the subject of Gonzo, I have to hand it them, this show once again demonstrates why they’ve been one of my favorite studios; when they get involved in science fiction you can really feel their passion in the distinctive visuals and backdrops they always at least try to be ambitious with the project whether it’s an adaptation or an original with bringing the setting to life.

Dune meets Hunt for the Red October, in great way… with a slight touch of Miyazaki?
Sam, while not very strong nor skilled, provides the “purity of heart” with his relentless dedication to freeing Maya. Mimay acts a bit as a reality anchor to him, although sometimes she just isnt enough. Bainas provides the tactical acumen and leadership of “the Captain”. And Gido makes for “worthy opponent” while the general seems more of a prejudiced racist type. And Ozma itself provides “the great mystery/force of nature”.