THE RELATIVITY OF TIME AND ENERGY --- THE MICROSCOPIC EXPLOSIONS OF "EMPTY" SPACE

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

c =2,997924
x108 m/s

h = 6,62606 x
10-34 kg m2 / sec

π = 3,141592...

2π =
6,283185

c2
=8,98755 x1016

μο = 4π x 10-7
H/m

εο=1/36π 109F/m

√
μο/εο =zo =μο
c

c = 1 /
√ μο εο

c2
= 1 / μο εο

Ε = h f = hc /
λ

Εo =
m c2 = F λ

Fη
= k q1 q2 / r2

c=120π
/4π x10-7

zo=120π

c / h =fmax

c = fmax
λmin

c = amax tmin

c = zo /
μo

fmax=Vmax /λmin

Fmax=Emax /λmin

λmin = c2
/amax

amax = c2
/ λmin

amax=λmin
fmax2

Emax=Fmax
λmin

Emax = fmax h

Henry Farad
=sec2

e=1,602176 x10-19

√2 = 1,4142135

0,452444 x1042

1,35639 x1050

1,23559 x1020

2,26873 x1023

h / c λmin
= Mmax

Vmax = Mmax V
/ M

h c
/ λ = Mpl G / λ

λe
/ re 2π = c / Vκ

1rad / s
~ 0,1591 Hz

.

Relativity of time or energy?
- The big traps of experience - the small explosions of indivisible
space…

THE BIG EXPLOSION IN THE FIELD OF SCIENCE

The physical laws, which
regulate the existence and the structure of material elements are not messages that come from
their
outside, from far and insubstantial way. These laws begin from the common " contact " that
the all structural elements have with one and the same " empty " space, with one and common completed
reality, with the same " communal " quantity of energy, finally from the common (invisible) their
substance. The total quantity of energy is the same for
the all things and the all structural elements takes shape with the same
fluctuations of energy in one and same dynamic space.

The first publication in the world

.

BIG QUESTIONS - SHORT ANSWERS !

THE MATHEMATIC MEETING OF PHILOSOPHY WITH THE PHYSICS AND THE SCIENCE
FOREVER

<•> The question
about the limits and unity of world, in brevity

~ Many years ago:
Do you said that don't exist eternal truths for the nature? The first universal relations constitute world axioms, certain clauses with
mathematic consequence, that predetermine the undeniably foundations not only of cosmology* but for each science. They exist universal
limits and traits for all things and if we ignore them, then our knowledge for the different things reveals these things more different and
with possibilities that don't have. If we know the common traits of things and the physical laws, thus disappear cer­tain foolish queries,
even some theories that have bet in the precision of certain mathematic calculations. Certain of these relations have extracted and
enumerated with a priori­ty afterwards (without care here, in order to they are corrected or supplemented and without comments).

• " Each part of the Universe isn't the total from the all moments (of time) and
with this definition, the part exists always (perforce) in a partial moment and not in an other (moment of time) " .1

• " The things are direct parts of the same reality and constitute a common Total "
.2

• " The things have relations each one with the other, that is to say they interact
and are influenced between them " .3

• " The things interact immediately and indirectly, in different and in the same
moments, with a lot of different ways " .4

• " The causes and results are themselves the things and their behavior. (...) 5
Each part of reality is a cause not common for all results and simultaneously a result not common for the all causes and interact with residual
parts " .6

• " The relation or connection of the part with the total reality is not only
indirect and external " .7

• " Each part of reality always differs immediately from its totality… " .8

• " Two things without nothing common (element) in their quality or in their
relations with the other things, would be utterly extraneous, utterly irrelevant and without some possibility for direct or indirect influence "
.9

• " When we say that the things are dependent between them, we mean, that they are
influenced permanently what and how are, from what are and from the ways, that are the remainder things or some of these " .10

• " There that exists an interaction, they exist always the common traits of the
cause and result " .11

• " The results of a cause are not these of an other cause and we find some causes,
that are irrelevant from certain results or they have a faraway indirect relation, which they could to not have. So as we say, they exist
combined a lot of causality chains " .12

• " The same cause on different things cannot has precisely or all same
consequences, while in direct or indirect relation with some other causes is possible to determine differently or opposite results. The same
cause can to determines a different result and the same result to is determined by a different cause… " .13

• " In reality, each part influences and modifies the rests, however not everything
(all parts), in the same moment " .14

• " The influences are continued with some ways that are not stable determined
(immutably), causing changes in the quality, activity and interaction of the intermediate things and thus they exist results, which are not
determined regularly by one and the same cause. In other words, they are materialized or exist results, for which certain of the causes have
ceased exist or to determine them and reversely: They exist causes that don't constitute the alone or first beginning for the existence of
certain results and however, these contribute or are useful for the existence of these results, even when these causes are not exist" .15

• "The so-called indetermination or the luck, in reality is the unstable
determination, (a changing determination), which is explained from the indirect (and relative) contribution that have each other the connected
parts of reality " .16

• " No one thing, which isn't the sufficient cause to itself, can not be the alone
cause for the existence or quality of another (...) However, it can't to be not a cause or to be not produces result… " .17

• " The alone (or sufficient) cause (...) which does not have an other cause except
itself, contrary to the partly causes, it is the perfect total of them (consequently, it is also these things together) ".18

• " The same things are certain causes for themselves, because their existence is a
part of one and same selfed-determine quality and not only an external part and for this reason, they are specified not only indirectly -
externally. Their sufficient cause is not an external fundamental nor an external final cause, it is their direct total, in which are parts
immediately (without any mediation)" .19

• " In order to exists interaction (or difference in the time), it should exist
things, which aren't the sufficient cause for self " .20

• " Each thing, externally unto other things and independently from the moment in
which it exists, it can be considered as a partial result, in the realization of which they have contributed indirectly (without a beginning)
all remainder things as certain causes " .21

• " Independently from the moment in which each thing begins to exists, it has been
influenced more indirectly by each other thing and this has affected (influence) indirectly every other " .22

• " The all things constitute a constant Total inside in limits of a time, they
aren't numberless, they do not interact with unlimited ways and the most indirect way with which each thing influences the other isn't infinite
" .23

• " The most indirect ways of interaction are these that have become since always
(without a beginning). (...) What are these more indirect results, which always are specified in the quality of each thing? As it will be
proved, these common elements are the common ways of interaction, which are named "matter" " .24

• " The results from most indirect interaction of the things, they are the things
with less interactions (...) 25 they constitute the stabilised ways of influence, that we name matter. (...) 26 The material elements are the
stabilised ways, with which the Universe always has become in its minimal moment and, in the abstract reality, these material constitute the
most simple qualities (of things) " .27

• "The most indirect way, with which a thing influences each other after a time
interval and through the all other parts, it should be common way and constantly the same way, and never to exists an other way more indirect
always" .28

• " The reality in its entirety of Time is finished (before the relative moment in
which its parts are exist as externally) and for this reason, they aren't only the things of previous moments, that influence the things in the
next moments, but also reversely… " .29

• " The substance is the fixed and uncreated beginning for relative things and this
does not mean, that the substance is the rest from the abstraction of each change and action. From a such substance would be absent the quality
and complexness. Not only without the substance they can't exist relations, changes, possibilities, but also without the last ones it can not
exists the substance as the first - common source " .30

• " The material elements are the ways, with which the Universal Quality begins
relatively to becomes indirectly in its minimal moment " .31

• " The different composite qualities can not be explained only from certain common
and external substances for the same reason, that could not be explained the existence of differences in initial common (and simple)
entities/substances " .32

• " The part, so theoretical and abstract is always this itself, it is always a
part, but its ceaseless change means that it is not precisely this same and without quality (nowise). The concept of change and time presuppose,
that this part is changing partly and isn't only one or simple " .33

• " The things are exist as limited, they are such as are in reference to others.
They have their existence with mediatory existence of many other things and with their connection in a environment, necessarily of the physical
laws. With this concept was used the phrase "in­direct existence or things". The indirect and separate their existence presup­poses a lack of
directness, time and a lack of substance. (...) All things are direct the same common substance and with this are connected immediately,
simultaneously (...) If the total of things wasn't a direct cause for its self, if it wasn't with a stabilised quality (like a total Time), then
the said things would not constitute some ways of a common sub­stance (...) and they couldn't be with a relatively constant and unified quality,
neither to have some common traits " .34* ".

In the fundamental thoughts that are enumerated with a selected sequence (thread), are
expressed with some vagueness (no however ambiguously) the most abstract concepts (nearby in Aristotle's categories), such as particularly
is the concept about the part, total and rela­tion. The description for the cosmos as a totality and as a part imposes the concept
(sig­nificance) about the relation and quantity. The union of concept of a totality with the con­cept of the time imposes the concept about
the change and dynamic relation between the parts. Then it is imposed to are determined the relations of resemblance, identity and
dif­ference between the part and totality. These first relations as were worded have mathe­matic prospect, such as in the mathematics is the
relation of the unit with itself unit and such as the division or multiplication of the unit imposes the concept about the quantity and
proportion. The vagueness is a exchange for the generalisation. However, it does not cancels the manifold importance of the universal
concepts, when undeniably they are ad­dressed in an unspecified multitude of things and phenomena and not in our fantasies.

In those years, in order to I avoid the rejection of dogmatic thinking and every thoughtless
people, who believe that can beforehand to appreciate, without need to hear or read, it was written the following footnote with the first
general thoughts: " The abstract concepts about thing and part are used with the unspecified broadness of an unknown x, which
corresponds in a limit of possible solutions, by which a big part is considered known and real. Through the interconnection of their
concepts in the develop­ment of the cogitation, then will clarified their limits and importance ".

• If we meet so much thoughtlessness, lack of ideas, unconcern for the clues, long-lasting
tolerance in the biases, cowardice for our expression, discriminatory application of knowledge with psychological and economically motives and
bureaucratic mentality, if we meet all these in persons that teach the sciences and in researchers: Then, we should think more beyond limits of this
question (about the role and reliability in the Science), how many more ineffectual and unreliable is the human thought for the problems in life
and society!

If an opinion of a madman is cor­rect, then it is correct. Don't downgraded and inva­lidated it, in
order to we select to hears the same view from a celebrat­ed per­son and with some ceremo­nious preparation, or becau­se we want a frame with
narra­tions for the curi­ous people and some his­torical remembrance

WHY THE CENTRAL IDEA OF THE "BIG BANG" THEORY, IT IS THE BIGGEST
FOOLISHNESS IN THE SCIENCE ! READ HERE