The WikiLeaks Climate Cables

Dec 6, 2010

RUSH: Hey, Snerdley, can you remember the first time I said on this program that environmentalism had nothing to do with the climate? When was the first time that I said militant environmentalism was the new home for displaced communists? It had to be back during the fall of the Berlin Wall. It had to be around 1990 or ’91. So we’ll figure 20 years ago. Now, this is what being on the cutting edge — (interruption) What? Well, that’s right, ’90, ’91, the Berlin Wall came down right after Gorbachev — when I said that militant environmentalism has nothing to do with the climate, has nothing to do with green trees and all this clean water garbage, it’s the new home of displaced communists, right? Well, there’s a website out there called Watts Up With That? Watts Up With That, more on the WikiLeaks climate cables. It turns out that there are a bunch of cables that have to do with climate change in the WikiLeaks dump, and a number of them prove my point.

‘Reading through the few Wikileaks cables related to climate, the tip of the iceberg becomes visible. The most interesting seems to involve the usual pressures related to top level nominations: in this case, the nomination for the IPCC Group II organization comes to light,’ for their Nobel Prize nomination, and Algore’s nomination. ‘The original cable is still not known, but it is said to state that Christopher Field had no opposition; the other proposed position for co-chair, Mostafa Jafari, an Iran scientist, was not acceptable, although a qualified scientist. The cable apparently states that Rajendra Pachauri, head of the IPCC, promised background collaboration, and non-identification of the US pressures. The Austrian delegate, which lead the selection process, also agreed on the veto on Jafari. In other cables, we can see the unreal demands being made by some countries in the World. The developed countries, pressured by alarmists, are ‘falling all over itself to browbeat them into taking money to go along with a plan to give them more money.”

This is all about climate change. It’s all about Copenhagen; it’s all about Cancun, all of these various seminars and meetings around the world that they’ve had. And the last paragraph of this post: ‘What really strikes us is the fact that all this Copenhagen/Cancun stuff has nothing to do with the Climate, or saving the World. It’s about political positioning, money, and plain old fascism cult promotion. But as referred before, this is only the tip of the iceberg. More is to come, and I wouldn’t be surprised if we’re going to be answered about who is behind Climategate, or Al Gore’s Nobel nomination, or the facts behind all the IPCC mess. Stay tuned…’

The UK Guardian has a piece: ‘WikiLeaks Cables Reveal How US Manipulated Climate Accord.’ Now, I think these guys at The Guardian totally misunderstand what they’re reading. It’s written by Damian Carrington. ‘Hidden behind the save-the-world rhetoric of the global climate change negotiations lies the mucky realpolitik: money and threats buy political support; spying and cyberwarfare are used to seek out leverage. The US diplomatic cables reveal how the US seeks dirt on nations opposed to its approach to tackling global warming; how financial and other aid is used by countries to gain political backing; how distrust, broken promises and creative accounting dog negotiations; and how the US mounted a secret global diplomatic offensive to overwhelm opposition to the controversial ‘Copenhagen accord’, the unofficial document that emerged from the ruins of the Copenhagen climate change summit in 2009.’ Now, The Guardian, if you read this — and they’re a bunch of leftists — The Guardian seems to believe that Obama and the regime was trying to limit the Copenhagen accord and thereby hurt the global warming movement. But the evidence is just the opposite in these cables.

Now, what is the Obama position on global warming? What is it? They believe that we are destroying the climate, that America is playing the lead role in this with all of our industrialization and our bigness, our superpower status, that we alone among nations are contributing greater to the destruction of the climate, and so these cables talk about how the US is browbeating other nations into going along with our view of things. The Guardian thinks our view of things is to downplay Copenhagen. Now, that was Bush. But Bush didn’t go to Copenhagen. Copenhagen happened with Obama. So once again, folks, the cutting edge of societal evolution and I had no evidence. I had no evidence. All I had was full knowledge of liberals, how they operate, what they think, and how they go about implementing their beliefs, and I know for a fact that global warming, climate change, whatever term they attach to it, is nothing more than an attempt to create socialist nations as far around the world as they can and to separate us from our money. That’s all it is and now the whole thing’s been exposed as a full-fledged, 100% fraud.