They say that if you want to catch fish, you gotta go where the fishermen ain't. My philosophy: You have to get your inspiration from places others don't or won't. Few things are worse than the parroting of wisdom received from folks who aren't all that wise. Also, this blog has a kind of cool acronym.

1 entry from April 2016

Tuesday, April 05, 2016

So, I suppose this was inevitable. The mainstream press, joined by the odd technology publication that really ought to know better, has been quick to chronicle the impending death of bitcoin with an odd level of told-ya-so triumphalism. With it, you have plenty of FUD around blockchain technology or even the distributed ledger concept itself.

Noting my longtime interest in blockchain technology and my public encouragement of the PR industry to take this overall trend seriously, the emails and IMs have already started coming in. I can only guess as to the motivations, but they include notes like “Now what do you have to say about this?” or, perhaps channeling Jeff Bezos, simply “?”

So, let me outline three important things you should know about the the relative impact of the recent coverage over the past month or so.

“Bitcoin” is not “blockchain.”

Bitcoin may deservedly be the pre-emptive metaphor for blockchain technology, but it is by no means its only use case. Whether you’re deploying on a public blockchain, a permissioned one, or a hybrid of the two (there’s room for all approaches), there are plenty of ways to apply this technology—bitcoin was merely the first. Personally, I’ve been a big fan of the potential for Ethereum for some time now (long before its recent rally) as well as the excitingprojectsthatitinspires.

This conflation is easy enough to do by accident, of course, but I also suspect that just as much of it is willful. There’s some media advantage to be had in reassuring people that fundamental changes in technology and society are just a fad and focusing on bitcoin’s issues is one way to try and dismiss blockchain concepts altogether. It’s an easy way to avoid addressing the issues at hand, while pretending to sound like “the adult in the room.” Hell, Paul Krugman has made a careerout of it.

True peer-to-peer is the real trend.

Underlying all of this energy around blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies is a move to a digital world that is either truly peer-to-peer or, in any event, lacking in hierarchies the way people are used to understanding them. Understanding how blockchain technology works is the most useful and practical way to keep abreast of this trend.

In the rush to amplify and exaggerate bitcoin’s problems, people are less able or willing to grok these changes. This will be unfortunate, because the move to true peer-to-peer will survive any cryptocurrency and will likely require a blockchain as part of its software stack. For his part, Ryan X. Charlescontinues to stand behind bitcoin as the foundation for his DATT project and has an excellent argument for doing so.

Most folks are seeing the open-source sausage get made for the first time.

None of the drama surrounding bitcoin should comeasasurprise to anyone who has paid even cursory attention to the open-source movement. If bitcoin’s troubles were your first introduction to how debates in this community take place, I apologize on behalf of open-source enthusiasts everywhere. I also say, “Welcome!”

You don’t have to follow open-source community closely to acknowledge that you rely on open-source software every day, from the supercomputer that crunched the aerodynamic profile of the car you drove to work to the smartphone you may be using to read this article. Given all of that, I wonder if minds would change if more people followed any of the mailings lists for, say, Linux kernel development. Such communities are infamous for their flamewars, rage-quits, code forks, and good ol’ take-my-ball-and-go-home pouting.

Say what you want about this reality of open-source, but take comfort that at least so much of it takes place out in the open. Part of the miracle of open-source is that it has every reason to fly itself apart yet still manages to produce some of the world’s most reliable and stable software.

In other words, all of this is fairly normal and routine. The big difference is that “The Internet of Ideas” and “The Internet of Commerce” is becoming “The Internet of Money.” That changes things.

Code Of Conduct

Comments here are unmoderated and are operated on a use-until-abused basis. I will adopt a moderation policy if I feel that my visitors abuse this privilege.

I will delete any comment that is lewd, crude, lascivious, racist, sexist, libelous, off-topic, or injurious to the privacy of a non-public individual. Such users will be forever banned from commenting on this site.

From time to time, certain comments will be investigated if they appear to be marketing spam. The offending company gets one free pass before public censure.