29 July 2002
Source: http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/fr-cont.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register: July 29, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 145)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 48989-48993]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29jy02-4]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 15
[ET Docket No. 01-278; FCC 02-211]
Radar Detectors
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document requires radar detectors to comply with limits
on radiated emissions in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band to prevent interference
to satellite services. Radar detectors are required to be approved by
the Federal Communications Commission or another designated
organization before they can be marketed within the United States.
DATES: Effective August 28, 2002. See Sec. 15.37(k) for Applicability
Dates.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hugh Van Tuyl, Office of Engineering
and Technology, (202) 418-7506.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's First
Report and Order, ET Docket No. 01-278, FCC 02-211, adopted July 12,
2002, and released July 19, 2002. The full text of this document is
available for inspection and copying during regular business hours in
the FCC Reference Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this document also may be
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International,
445 12th Street, SW., Room, CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. The full
text may also be downloaded at: www.fcc.gov. Alternative formats are
available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at
(202) 418-7426 or TTY (202) 418-7365.
Summary of the First Report and Order
1. By this action, the Commission is requiring that radar detectors
comply with radiated emission limits in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band under
part 15 of the rules, and that all radar detectors be certified to
demonstrate compliance with the emission limits before they can be
marketed. The requirements will become effective thirty days from the
publication of the rules in the Federal Register for radar detectors
being manufactured and imported, and sixty days after publication of
the rules in the Federal Register for radar detectors being marketed.
This action will significantly reduce interference from radar detectors
to very small aperture satellite terminals (VSATs.)
2. Most receivers contain one or more oscillators that generate
radio frequency signals intended to be used internally within the
device in tuning the received signal. These generated signals can
radiate from the receiver and have the potential to interfere with
other nearby receivers. For this reason, part 15 of the Commission's
rules requires certain receivers to meet the radiated emission limits
for ``unintentional radiators'' to minimize the possibility of
interference. The current rules require only receivers that tune in the
range of 30-960 MHz and Citizen's Band receivers to comply with these
limits. Other receivers are not required to comply with the limits, but
the rules require that any receiver that causes interference must cease
operation. When these requirements were established, most consumer
receivers tuned only below 960 MHz. Because there was less probability
of receivers that tune above 960 MHz causing interference, the rules
did not require such receivers to meet emission limits or to receive an
equipment authorization. The emission limit that applies to
unintentional radiators other than receivers at frequencies above 960
MHz is a field strength limit of 500 V/m measured at a
distance of 3 meters.
3. Radar detectors that warn of the presence of police speed-
measuring radars are currently exempt from complying with the part 15
emission limits because they are receivers that tune only above 960
MHz. They are designed to monitor for the presence of police radar in
several frequency bands, including the 10.50-10.55 GHz, 24.05-24.25 GHz
and 33.4-36.0 GHz bands. Radar detectors contain a tuning oscillator
that operates above the 10.50-10.55 GHz band. In older models this
oscillator generally operated on frequencies below the 11.7-12.2 GHz
VSAT downlink band, and we have not received complaints of interference
to VSATs from such models. However, the potential for radar detectors
to interfere with VSATs has recently increased because radar detector
manufacturers have begun using oscillators at higher frequencies that
place swept frequency emissions within the VSAT downlink band. The
purpose of these changes was to enhance detection of police radar while
making it more difficult for police to detect the presence of radar
detectors in vehicles.
4. On October 15, 2001, the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed
Rule Making and Order (``NPRM'') 66 FR 59209, November 27, 2001, that
proposed to make a number of changes to part 15 and other parts of the
rules. The NPRM sought comment on whether there is a need to require
radar detectors to comply with radiated emission limits to minimize the
possibility of interference to authorized services including VSAT
operations, and if so, the appropriate limits that should be applied.
The NPRM also sought comments on whether there are other receivers that
tune above 960 MHz that should be required to comply with emission
limits, and if so, the appropriate limits and frequency bands where
they should apply. Further, the NPRM sought comment concerning the
timeframe for affected receivers that should be required to comply with
any new emission limits.
5. We have found that radar detectors being marketed emit high
level radio signals that can cause interference to VSATs. Accordingly,
we conclude that
[[Page 48990]]
there is a need for limits on the radiated emissions from radar
detectors to protect VSATs from interference. Tests on several radar
detectors at the Commission's laboratory found emission levels ranging
from 33,000 V/m to 231,000 V/m at 3 meters within the
VSAT band. The information in the record in this proceeding claims that
some radar detector emissions exceed 100,000 V/m at 3 meters
in the VSAT band, which is consistent with our measurements. These
levels are far greater than the satellite receive signal levels in the
11.7-12.2 GHz band. These levels are also greater than the levels part
15 permits for some transmitters operating in Industrial, Scientific
and Medical (ISM) bands, and are over 200 times greater than the part
15 limit for spurious emissions above 960 MHz. Such levels have a high
potential for causing interference to satellite operations, and the
information in the record does in fact document many instances of
harmful interference caused by radar detectors to satellite operations.
VSATs use relatively small receive antenna dishes, on the order of one
to two meters, which are less directional and less able to reject
signals outside the main receive axis than larger antenna dishes. Also,
VSATs are commonly used by small businesses such as stores and gas
stations, so they are typically located close to the ground and in
close proximity to automobiles. For these reasons, they can not
tolerate the levels of interfering signals being emitted by radar
detectors.
6. Part 15 requires the operator of an unlicensed device (in this
case, the user of a radar detector) to cease operation in the event the
device causes harmful interference, even if that device is not subject
to specific emission limits. However, identifying each individual
source of interference from radar detectors is not practical for a
satellite operator because these devices are mobile and therefore
interfere intermittently. Further, these interference sources are not
under the control of the satellite operator, so in most cases it is not
possible for the satellite operator to remedy the interference even if
the source could be identified. Under Section 302 of the Communications
Act, the Commission has authority to make reasonable regulations
governing the interference potential of devices which in their
operation are capable of emitting radio frequency radiation in
sufficient degree to cause harmful interference to radio
communications, and to require devices marketed to comply with these
regulations. We conclude that the only reasonable solution to this
interference situation is to require radar detectors to comply with
emission limits before they are marketed.
7. We will define a radar detector as a receiver designed to signal
the presence of radio signals used for determining the speed of motor
vehicles because that is the type of device that has caused
interference to VSATs and this definition best covers the general range
of these products. We do not intend for this definition to encompass
the receiver incorporated within a radar transceiver certified under
the Commission's rules such as a police radar gun or an anti-collision
radar because those devices have not been a source of interference to
VSATs.
8. We will require radar detectors to comply with the same limit in
the 11.7-12.2 GHz VSAT band that applies to other unintentional
radiators operating under part 15 of the rules. This limit is 500
V/m measured at a distance of 3 meters, and is based on the
use of measurement equipment with a 1 MHz measurement bandwidth and an
average detector function. As with other part 15 devices, the emission
levels measured with a peak detector function may not exceed the
average limit by more than 20 dB. This emission limit has a long and
successful history of controlling interference to authorized services
and will protect VSATs from harmful interference caused by radar
detectors in virtually all cases. In those rare cases where radar
detector emissions at that level cause harmful interference, the non-
interference requirement of Sec. 15.5 will continue to apply. We are
applying emission limits in only the VSAT downlink band because the
only complaints of interference that we have received are to VSAT
receivers in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band. We expect that adopting these
limits will result in manufacturers changing receiver local oscillators
to frequencies outside this band, so as a practical matter only
spurious emissions will fall within the VSAT downlink band. These
emissions will typically be far below the emission limit we are
adopting and are unlikely to result in harmful interference to VSATs.
9. As stated in part 15 of the rules, we expect manufacturers to
use good engineering practice in the design of their equipment and
suppress emissions as much as practicable. We will consider modifying
the emission limits we are adopting for radar detectors if a need is
shown for such changes, such as if interference to VSAT operations or
other authorized services occurs. We are also willing to consider, in
future proceedings, limiting radar detector primary oscillators to
particular frequencies, should that prove necessary to avoid harmful
interference.
10. Because many radar detectors being marketed today emit high
level signals that can cause interference to VSATs, we conclude that
the public interest is best served by requiring that all radar
detectors marketed within the United States meet the new emission
limits quickly. Accordingly, we are requiring that all radar detectors
marketed beginning sixty days after publication of this decision and
the associated rules in the Federal Register must comply with the new
rules. This plan will provide a reasonable amount of time for
manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers to be notified of the rule
changes so they can cease marketing non-compliant units. Furthermore,
we are requiring that radar detectors imported into the United States
or manufactured in this country for use within this country comply with
the new rules beginning thirty days after publication of this decision
and the associated rules in the Federal Register. In requiring that
manufacturing and importation of radar detectors meet the new
requirements before the marketing cut-off date, we are providing
manufacturers time to introduce compliant models before the sixty-day
marketing cutoff. This will also prevent the manufacture or importation
of large numbers of non-compliant devices prior to the marketing cutoff
date. The new rules will apply only to devices being imported,
manufactured and marketed after the specified effective dates. We are
not adopting specific rules concerning devices already sold, but such
devices will continue to be subject to the non-interference requirement
in Sec. 15.5 of the rules.
11. We will require that radar detectors be authorized under our
certification procedure because they have been found to emit spurious
RF energy at levels that can cause harmful interference to authorized
radio services. The certification procedure provides a higher level of
oversight of equipment compliance prior to marketing than either the
Declaration of Conformity (DoC) or the verification self-approval
procedures. As we noted previously, equipment with the potential to
create significant interference to communication services requires a
higher level of oversight than manufacturer's self-approval. In view of
the fact that the new rules we are establishing for radar detectors are
clear and the testing methods used to determine compliance with the
rules are straightforward, we will permit Telecommunication
Certification Bodies
[[Page 48991]]
(TCBs) to certify them. Allowing TCBs to certify radar detectors will
permit manufacturers to obtain an equipment approval in an expeditious
manner because manufacturers will have more than one approval body to
choose from. The tests that will be required for radar detectors are
field strength measurements over a single frequency band, which TCBs
accredited to make radiated measurements above 1 GHz are already
capable of performing. The staff of the Office of Engineering and
Technology will work with TCBs to promptly address any implementation
issues which may arise.
12. We recognize that requiring radar detectors to be certified
within thirty days after publication of the new rules in the Federal
Register may pose some logistical problems for manufacturers. Many
radar detectors may already comply with the new emission limits and
could thus be certified quickly. However, because many of these units
may already be in transit from the manufacturer to wholesalers and
retailers, it would be difficult for manufacturers to bring these
devices into compliance with the administrative requirements for
certified devices within this timeframe. Specifically, all equipment
authorized under the certification procedure is required to be labeled
with an FCC identification number. In addition, part 15 requires a
warning label stating that the device may not cause harmful
interference and must accept any interference received, and requires
the user's manual to contain a statement that unauthorized changes or
modifications could void the user's authority to operate the equipment.
It is unlikely that manufacturers could comply with these
administrative requirements within thirty days because the time needed
to make changes on the assembly line and ship products would generally
be greater than thirty days. We believe that the rules' intention to
notify customers can be satisfied by other means without causing delays
to manufacturers. We will therefore permit radar detectors manufactured
or imported within 180 days of the publication of the new rules in the
Federal Register to be labeled with the FCC identification number and
part 15 warning statement on the individual equipment carton rather
than on the device itself, so long as certification has been obtained
for those units. In addition, we will not require the statement about
unauthorized changes to be placed in the user's manual during this time
period. This approach will eliminate the need for manufacturers to
cease manufacturing and importing equipment to implement the new
labeling requirements, and will provide a practical means to label
products that comply with the technical requirements but that were
produced without labels.
13. Radar detector manufacturers have offered to provide the
Commission with lists of radar detector serial numbers to assist in
identifying products manufactured before and after the date on which
equipment authorization is required. We believe that such lists could
assist us in determining whether radar detectors being marketed were
legally manufactured and imported. Accordingly, we will require all
parties that manufacture or import radar detectors as of the
manufacturing and importation cutoff date we are adopting to supply
such lists. The Office of Engineering and Technology will issue a
public notice that will ask parties to supply this information once the
necessary Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval to collect
this information has been obtained.
14. We disagree with comments that a Further Notice of Proposed
Rule Making is needed before we can adopt emission limits for radar
detectors because the NPRM did not propose specific regulations. Under
the Administrative Procedure Act, it is not necessary for the NPRM to
propose specific regulations. Rather, it must include either the terms
or substance of the proposed rules, or a description of the subjects
and issues involved. The NPRM clearly described the subject and issues
involved, which is that we were considering adopting emission limits
for radar detectors, and sought comment on the appropriate limits. The
large number of comments received from both the satellite industry and
the radar detector industry show that parties had adequate notice of
potential rule changes, so a Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is
unnecessary.
15. We decline to adopt emission limits for other receivers
operating above 960 MHz. There is not sufficient information in the
record in this proceeding to justify emission limits for receivers
above 960 MHz other than radar detectors. We are adopting emission
limits for radar detectors because they have been found to emit high
level signals that can cause interference to VSATs. No information was
provided to show that similar circumstances exist with other receivers
operating above 960 MHz. Therefore, we find that requiring other
receivers operating above 960 MHz to comply with emission limits is not
necessary at this time. This does not preclude our ability to impose
such limits in the future if the need becomes apparent.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
16. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),\1\ an
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated in the
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, Review of Part 15 and other Parts of
the Commission's Rules (NPRM).\2\ The Commission sought written public
comments on the proposals in the Notice, including comment on the
IRFA.\3\ This present analysis conforms to the RFA.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., has
been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996,
Public Law 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the
CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (SBREFA).
\2\ See Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order in ET Docket
No. 01-278, 66 FR 59209 (November 27, 2001).
\3\ See id.
\4\ See generally 5 U.S.C. 604.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the First Report and Order
17. Section 11 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 require the
Commission (1) to review biennially its regulations pertaining to
telecommunications service providers and broadcast ownership; and (2)
to determine whether economic competition has made those regulations no
longer necessary in the public interest. The Commission is directed to
modify or repeal any such regulations that it finds are no longer in
the public interest.
18. As part of the biennial review for the year 2000, the
Commission reviewed its regulations pertaining to telecommunications
service providers and broadcast ownership and recommended a number of
changes to those rules. While not specifically required by statute, the
Commission also reviewed parts 2, 15 and 18 of the Commission's Rules
as part of this process.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 47 CFR parts 2, 15, 18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
19. The First Report and Order requires radar detectors, which have
been currently exempt from complying with emission limits, to meet the
part 15 limits in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band to avoid causing interference
to satellite services.
B. Summary of Significant Issues Raised by Public Comments in Response
to the IRFA
20. Comments on the IRFA were received from radar detector
manufacturers, who state they are small entities. RADAR Members, a
trade
[[Page 48992]]
association, argues that the adoption of limits across a wide band of
spectrum would eliminate radar detectors from the consumer market, and
that some companies would be unable to survive in the face of such a
regulation. It states that as an alternative, manufacturers will
voluntarily reduce emission in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band where
interference to satellite operations was actually reported. Cobra
Electronics Corporation states that it is a small entity that deserves
consideration under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. It states that
redesigning its product line, especially considering the very real
possibility that doing so would eliminate the market for this product,
obviously would be detrimental to small businesses such as Cobra. It
further states that there is evidence that the industry is already
addressing the satellite interference complaints.
C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which
the Proposed Rules Will Apply
21. The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be
affected by the proposed rules, if adopted.\6\ The RFA generally
defines the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the
terms ``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small
governmental jurisdiction.''\7\ In addition, the term ``small
business'' has the same meaning as the term ``small business concern''
under the Small Business Act.\8\ A small business concern is one which:
(1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its
field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the SBA.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 5 U.S.C. 604.
\7\ 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
\8\ 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition
of ``small business concern'' in 15 U.S.C. 632). Pursuant to the
RFA, the statutory definition of a small business applies ``unless
an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration and after opportunity for public
comment, establishes one or more definitions of such term which are
appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such
definition(s) in the Federal Register.'' 5 U.S.C. 601(3).
\9\ Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632 (1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
22. Our present action will affect some manufacturers of radio
frequency equipment (RF manufacturers). The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) has designated a small business size standard for
entities engaged in Radio and Television Broadcasting or Wireless
Communications Equipment Manufacturing.\10\ According to SBA, such a
manufacturer must have 750 or fewer employees in order to qualify as a
small business.\11\ According to Census Bureau data from 1992, there
were 858 such firms in the United States, and 778 had 750 or fewer
employees.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 13 CFR 121.201, North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) code 334220.
\11\ Id.
\12\ See U.S. Department of Commerce, 1992 Census of
Transportation, Communications and Utilities (issued May 1995).
These data have been updated for year 1997, but without the small
business breakout. See Summary, Economic Census, Subject Series:
Manufacturing at 1-19 (issued June 2001). By 1997, the census total
for firms in this category had increased to 1,096. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements
23. The First Report and Order requires radar detectors used on
vehicles to meet the part 15 emission limits in the 11.7-12.2 GHz band
to prevent interference to satellite services. It requires that radar
detectors be certified to show that they comply with these requirements
before they can be imported or marketed. Certification requires the
manufacturer to have the equipment tested for compliance with the
rules, and then file an application with the test data and information
on the product with the Commission or a designated Telecommunication
Certification Body (TCB). The manufacturer must wait until the
application is granted before the equipment can be imported or
marketed. Equipment that is certified must also be labeled with an FCC
identification number and warning label stating that operation of the
equipment must cease in the event it causes harmful interference to
authorized radio services.
24. As a result of the rule change, some manufacturers will be
required to redesign radar detectors to reduce emissions in the 11.7-
12.2 GHz band. This could be accomplished by a change in the internal
oscillator frequencies. Radar detector manufacturers state that 73
percent of units currently marketed can meet the emission limits in the
11.7-12.2 GHz band, and that the remainder will meet the limit by
January 2003.
25. Because many radar detectors being marketed today emit high
level signals that can cause interference to VSATs, the First Report
and Order requires that all radar detectors marketed within the United
States meet the new emission limits beginning sixty days after
publication of this decision and the associated rules in the Federal
Register must comply with the new rules. This plan will provide a
reasonable amount of time for manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers
to be notified of the rule changes so they can cease marketing non-
compliant units. The First Report and Order also requires that radar
detectors imported into the United States or manufactured within this
country comply with the new rules beginning thirty days after
publication of this decision and the associated rules in the Federal
Register. This will provide manufacturers time to introduce compliant
models before the sixty-day marketing cutoff. This will also avoid the
manufacture or importation of large numbers of non-compliant devices
prior to the marketing cutoff date. Manufacturers will be permitted to
label radar detectors on the individual carton, rather than on the
device itself, for a period of 180 days. In addition, manufacturers
will not be required to place a statement about ``unauthorized
changes'' in the instruction manuals until after this time period.
These new rules will apply only to devices being imported, manufactured
and marketed after the specified effective dates.
26. We are also requiring a one-time filing of radar detector
serial numbers to aid in our enforcement of the new rules.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See para. 13, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
27. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach,
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1)
The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities;
(3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an
exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small
entities.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 5 U.S.C. 603(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
28. The First Report and Order requires emission limits on radar
detectors, which will have an impact on small equipment manufacturers.
We find that emission limits on radar detectors are necessary because
manufacturers have been building them without any suppression on
radiated emissions, and the radiated signals have been found to cause
interference to satellite radio services. Because interference has been
reported only in the 11.7-12.2 GHz satellite band, and in light of
comments filed by small
[[Page 48993]]
businesses in this proceeding, we are requiring radiated emission
limits in only the one band. This will minimize the impact on small
manufacturers, because emission limits applied across a wide band would
require significant redesign of the equipment, which would
substantially increase its cost.
29. The effective dates for our actions are necessary for an
orderly transition to compliance. Alternative time frames might assist
small businesses to comply, yet would be inconsistent with the goal of
reducing interfering equipment. Because many radar detectors may
already comply with the new emission limits, the requirement to obtain
certification within 30 days is not expected to have a significant
impact on manufacturers. The impact on small manufacturers will be
further reduced by allowing labeling to appear on the individual
equipment carton rather than the device for a period of 180 days,
because that will permit manufacturers to obtain certification for, and
label equipment already in shipment.
30. Finally, we are requiring a one-time filing of serial numbers
to aid in our enforcement efforts, and believe that this is a minimal
compliance burden.
31. Report to Congress: The Commission will send a copy of the
First Report and Order, including this FRFA, in a report to be sent to
Congress pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A). In addition, the Commission will send a copy of the First
Report and Order, including FRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration. A copy of the First Report and Order
and FRFA (or summaries thereof) will also be published in the Federal
Register. See 5 U.S.C. 604(b).
32. Pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 301, 302,
303(e), 303(f), 303(r), 304 and 307 of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended, 47 USC Sections 154(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), 303(r),
304, and 307, part 15 of the Commission's Rules is amended.
33. The Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau,
Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of this Report and
Order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
34. When requested by Public Notice, all parties that manufactured
or imported radar detectors as of August 28, 2002 of these rules shall
supply a list of radar detector models and information on their serial
numbers which permits identification of their manufacturing date to the
Office of Engineering and Technology. This requirement is subject to
OMB review and approval and will become effective after such approval
is obtained.
List of subjects in 47 CFR Part 15
Communications equipment, Labeling, Radio, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
Rule Changes
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 15 to read as follows:
PART 15--RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 15 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302, 303, 304, 307, 336 and 544A.
2. Section 15.3 is amended by adding paragraph (ee) to read as
follows:
Sec. 15.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
(ee) Radar detector. A receiver designed to signal the presence of
radio signals used for determining the speed of motor vehicles. This
definition does not encompass the receiver incorporated within a radar
transceiver certified under the Commission's rules.
3. Section 15.37 is amended by adding paragraph (k) to read as
follows:
Sec. 15.37 Transition provisions for compliance with the rules.
* * * * *
(k) Radar detectors manufactured or imported after August 28, 2002
and marketed after September 27, 2002 shall comply with the regulations
specified in this part. Radar detectors manufactured or imported prior
to January 27, 2003 may be labeled with the information required by
Secs. 2.925 and 15.19(a) of this chapter on the individual equipment
carton rather than on the device, and are exempt from complying with
the requirements of Sec. 15.21.
4. Section 15.101, paragraph (a) is amended by adding a new entry
to the table following the entry for ``Scanning receiver'' and by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 15.101 Equipment authorization of unintentional radiators.
(a) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equipment authorization
Type of device required
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * *
* * *
Radar detector............................ Certification.
* * * *
* * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Only those receivers that operate (tune) within the frequency
range of 30-960 MHz, CB receivers and radar detectors are subject to
the authorizations shown in paragraph (a) of this section. However,
receivers indicated as being subject to Declaration of Conformity that
are contained within a transceiver, the transmitter portion of which is
subject to certification, shall be authorized under the verification
procedure. Receivers operating above 960 MHz or below 30 MHz, except
for radar detectors and CB receivers, are exempt from complying with
the technical provisions of this part but are subject to Sec. 15.5.
* * * * *
5. Section 15.109 is amended by adding paragraph (h) to read as
follows:
Sec. 15.109 Radiated emission limits.
* * * * *
(h) Radar detectors shall comply with the emission limits in
paragraph (a) of this section over the frequency range of 11.7-12.2
GHz.
[FR Doc. 02-19178 Filed 7-26-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P