Categories

Miners in the post-COVID-19 world

Given the aggravating COVID-19 disruption, the AlphaValue mining universe has witnessed a major sell-off. However, the base metal pricing correction continues to be less severe. One reason could be markets’ preference to hold on to physical assets – with relatively better (demand) visibility. Moreover, unlike the previous crises, many miners are better-positioned to withstand market uncertainty. Hence, there could be selective plays within the sector.

This note is a continuation of our Latest titled ‘Are there opportunities in a COVID-19-infected mining sector?’ published on 11 March 2020. Some of the key strengths/USPs of the sector and/or companies have been reiterated. Moreover, in this piece we also delve into some sector-specific aspects vs. the previous crises, and why some companies (despite their might) could still be laggards, while the smaller and more-agile firms may do better.

Over the past one month, while China has done exceedingly well to contain the COVID-19 outbreak, the developed world – primarily the US and EU – has been caught on the wrong foot, with their COVID-19 infections and mortality increasing exponentially. Hence, the possibility of a global recession is now imminent. As a result, massive stimulus packages have been announced by various countries. Below is a snippet of how miners (diversified + non-ferrous) and key base metals have fared since the beginning of 2020.

Miners vs. Base Metals vs. STOXX600

Given miners’ deep-cyclicality, it isn’t surprising that their fall exceeds the broader markets. However, the relative resilience of base metals – particularly iron ore (+2.2% ytd) and aluminium (-2.1%) – is intriguing. So what is the explanation for this sustained out-performance?

While earnings growth expectations have been hammered across the board – including for defensives like pharmas, and more severely for macro-sensitive miners, the market’s flight to metals can possibly be explained by the following:1/ safety of holding physical assets, unlike ‘uberised’ business models – where cash flows are backed by intangibles, whose value may vanish rapidly during acute economic stress;2/ better long-term demand visibility, unlike oil – where environmental factors shall sooner or later precipitate a material switch to cleaner alternatives;3/ relatively fragmented global production and, hence, lower risk of price wars, unlike oil – where Saudis have a vested interest in maintaining their production dominance; and4/ China – consuming >40% of major base metals – so far doing better to contain the COVID-19 outbreak, along with the massive stimulus already underway, supports the case for a relatively-quicker revival of metals as an asset class.

Unlike the last crises of 2008-09 and 2014-15, AV universe miners are better-positioned to withstand prolonged market difficulties due to the following factors:

1/ balance sheets are healthier; 2019-end gearing of 29% vs. 57% and 54% in 2008-09 and 2014-15, respectively;2/ progressive dividends and hefty share buy-backs were dumped in the last downturn; hence, any dividend rationalisation / suspension in line with profitability erosion may not be very surprising; and3/ capital spend has been well-under control, with not many (greenfield) projects under development; moreover, biggish acquisitions have been avoided, thereby lowering the risk of impairments.

Below is a quick summary of the respective miners in AV coverage:

BHP GroupIts iron ore exposure is the sole near-term benefit; the new CEO has the challenging task of dealing with coal and oil assets – with divestment / turnaround plans possibly hitting a roadblock; restoration of healthy / stable copper operations should be a key priority.

Rio TintoMaterial iron ore dependence is a blessing in disguise; better-positioned to maintain attractive dividends and scout for attractively-priced growth opportunities; backing of Chinese state-owned Chalco (largest shareholder) could be a tactical advantage vs. other Australian iron ore exporters.

GlencoreCOVID-19 macro mess may possibly moderate the extent of on-going regulatory scrutiny; given the market volatility, trading could yet again be a saving grace; however, management needs to figure out a way of dealing with the mess in coal and oil markets, and Copper Africa; current scenario could result in a delayed departure of Ivan Glasenberg.

Anglo AmericanResurfacing coal market headwinds, operational difficulties in PGM South Africa and COVID-19 induced further weakness in diamonds are pertinent concerns; while the balance sheet is in a much-better shape vs. the last crisis, ownership of relatively less-cost competent assets may force strategic uncertainty; reconsideration of abandoned disposal plans cannot be ruled out.

Norsk HydroFurther material performance weakness is inevitable; however, dominance across the value chain supports the long-term green aluminium proposition; oil weakness-induced NOK tailwinds should render some cost comfort; despite operational mayhem, Norsk has one of the strongest balance sheets; presence of the Norwegian State as the largest shareholder is a critical support.

RusalSimilar to Norsk, further material near-term performance weakness is inevitable; however, an integrated (and greener) business structure – with a big focus on value-added products – is an important long-term USP; oil weakness-induced rouble tailwinds should render cost support; stake in Norilsk Nickel is a prized investment – especially given its healthy dividends, partly compensating for cash flow weakness in core aluminium operations.

AntofagastaUnlike many large-cap diversified miners, Antofagasta has done well both on the production and (unit) cost front; given copper’s (relatively) controlled supplies, also due to frequent outages and lack of new major growth projects, any sustained sell-off seems difficult; with major growth projects already completed, the group has the flexibility to defer expansions – which may help maintain balance sheet strength, also supported by liquid investments worth >$1.5bn.

BolidenStrong balance sheet, which is a function of high-quality (and diverse) mining plus smelting assets – no major impairments in more than a decade, and a gearing cushion; while the group’s acute European business dependence has now become a cause for concern – with COVID-19 causing major disruption in the region, simultaneously a weaker Swedish krona (SEK10/USD) and moderate inflation should render an ample near-term cushion.

ErametWhile a degree of recovery is expected in China, nickel prices are expected to stay under pressure; manganese too could face headwinds with steel production curtailments in Europe and the US; the group’s balance sheet is worrisome – forcing us to factor in a c. €300m capital increase; the lithium project in Argentina could (at least) be postponed in our view.Out of all the stocks discussed above, Rio Tinto, Boliden and Antofagasta are still better-positioned in the current macro environment. The aluminium majors Norsk Hydro and Rusal are also pretty compelling at current levels, however, their re-rating should be a function of when a market balance is restored – a scenario which cannot be averted for very long.

While the risk of more earnings rationalisation remains pertinent, miners are perhaps not as bad an investment proposition – given that the world should sooner or later continue consuming base metals, with a lower risk of substitution, for varied economic activities.

About Us

Founded in 2007, AlphaValue is the world’s leading provider of Independent European Equity and Credit Research. We provide comprehensive, unconflicted research-only (no execution, no corporate finance) coverage of c. 480 European mid and large cap stocks. We have an average of 46% of negative recommendations at any one time. Learn more at www.alphavalue.com