It seems a group of researchers have discovered One of the crash sites from a fragment from a comet.

102 years after the fall of the famous celestial body in Tunguska taiga, scientists finally managed to identify the crash site of one of its fragments
and examine the unusual composition of the substance of this space creature. The study was conducted using a unique instrument - GPR. As a result, it
was proved that it was not a meteorite, but a comet.

Also note that there where eyewitnesses to this account.

"I was swinging my ax when the sky in the north has divided into two parts and a fire appeared in it above the forest, which covered the entire
northern part of the sky. At that moment I felt so hot, as if my shirt was on fire. I wanted to tear and throw off my shirt, but the sky slammed shut
and there was a strong blow. I was dropped off the porch and blown away.

It could very well be true though. But I'll believe it more readily when I read it elsewhere.

edit on 19-11-2010 by FalselyFlagged because:
(no reason given)

Im sorry i didnt know anything about pravda being unreliable. I know i have been a member since 2007 but i didnt log on for 2 years until october of
this year. So knowing this i can see now how this is just more bull most likely. I just looked up more on this to see if i could find it anywhere
else, And i see it is not fact.

But i did find something even more spectacular. I didnt know that this object had changed direction before it exploded. Here are many pages of detail
on the subject.

So can anyone tell me how to change the title to this? I want to update it and put the source in the title so people wont waist there time.I am not
one to try to gain stars and flags by posting bunk info.

Well i still want to change the title. I saw a post earlier that had a source provided by beforethenews and just learned about that site to. B.T.W
they are the only other source of this story. I seen that after you guys told me about pravda.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.