I voted "don't allow".Because i could just change all maps and reenter my game. Well it wouldn't get 1th again, but still would be unfair. But what would be if i would reuse that engine to make a multiplayer online game?It would then be a new version of the engine, but a completly new game.

Maybe you could make a poll for each "old" entry that comes up next compo, to decide if it can enter or not. That's my opinion.

While I agree in theory that it should be okay to re-enter a game or app if major changes have been made, I think the fact is there's abound to be disagreements over what constitutes "major changes." The coder may say, "No, there's major changes here, I worked for months improving the code," but someone else might not think the changes are enough to be considered "major." So it's better to simply not allow the same work to be entered twice. This makes the contest more interesting anyway, it's always nice to see all new works entered than just the same things.

At the very least, entries that placed in the top three should not be accepted as re-entries.

Personally, I think it would be nice if only games or apps that have never before been released at all were allowed in the contest, but I guess that would probably limit the number of entries too much.

Ye, it would be sweet to have fresh homebrew delivered to your doorstep at the next compo but that would most likely limit the amount of apps/games presented. I don't mind seeing the same entry if improvements are rather visible, more than a word of author that 'there is something in there..something new and improved".

It would also be very easy to distinguish what has been added/improved really. Here's the example~DukeDS came to this compo, Ok. What's missing is sfx/music and speed optimization so that's very obvious. Comes next compo, these three things solved/improved/added~voila..the whole new entry. No reason not to include it for the compo. The same goes for apps, developers submit the changelog, neoflash mods compare it to the previous versions and hopefully test it out as well and if the change /improvement is there..no problem, enter 200 compos if you will and win all of them!

While we're at it.. <<ok, this is pigeon smoking weed, I'm telling you.

No, Dr Neo, I don't think it is a good choice.You must stop to accept entries a second time.Only new entries are good for a compo. If a game/app seems to be not finished and we use it for the compo, it is our pb if we will have a bad score.

I voted against reentering with the same game/app, but I think in CERTAIN CASES it COULD EVENTUALLY be allowed... That is, if the homebrew was more or less in preview state (ie not finished) when it first entered, and has MAJOR changes in the new one...

But, all in all, we could just think that not allowing to reenter will prevent people from submitting unfinished stuff

I think an APP or a GAME can continue Neocompo.Why?Because I want to finish my game and do a full playable version.Neocompo is for me motivation to continue my game.But if new functions aren't very important, Jury can refuse the game.

hum... maybe we can give more high "original score" to the original new project, like give it more +2 even +3 , then in this way we can keep to give the chance to the "old" entry to make a big improvement to let their entries to win, because even 1 score will affect the result.

In this way, the very promising project have chance to grow still for the second life, and compo have given more support to the "original" project try to enter compo. this way whould be a nice soluton,both for "original" and "old" project, it make the compo balancing ?