TH is very prideful person. He thrive for reputation of his intelligence. I think it is due to his degree of law he has.

I'm going to attempt to decipher that. I'll begin with noting that while meshak has no problem discussing me, she does so from behind a shield protecting her from hearing my answer. Where I come from that's cowardly.

Proud? I'm proud of my education. Sure. I earned it, paid for it and it has done a great deal of good for a large number of people. I don't understand "He thrive for"...and intelligence isn't established by a show of hands, so if I understand what she's shooting for there, she's mistaken. Lastly, I valued intelligence and its development long before I went to law school.

Quote:

I put him on ignore because of his never ending tactic to continue on with theology. Because I put him on ignore, he continually claiming I am defeated.

The last part simply isn't true. She put me on ignore because I differed with her interpretation of scripture and put questions to her that she either wasn't prepared or inclined to answer.

Quote:

His doctrine is out of context because he is dismissing Jesus' own word.

But she still wants to argue against me. She just doesn't want to have to actually argue.

Quote:

I am very suspicious of his degree because he is so unprofessional in his never ending whining when he does not win.

Rather, she's one of those people who, failing in argument, attempt to undermine what she perceives as the authority of the voice raised against her. The truth is that were I a brick layer my arguments would stand on their own merit and her silence and hiding would mark her regardless.

As to this peculiar doubts as to my credentials nonsense, started by Sod on one of his worse days, I've told anyone interested that my credentials have been confirmed by a member here who is known as an honest enough fellow. I've told anyone with that question to PM him.

Quote:

When he does not win he reports people whom he is holding grudge on, too, it seems.

Well, no. I've argued with alwight and AB and zip and any number of people, argued hard and fiercely on occasion and I've never reported a one of their posts. Because our differences, while strong, were rooted in a mutual respect. I reported Sod and SD and only a handful of others in my long stay here for serious and repeated rules violations. In Sod and SD's cases the violations were aimed at me. Beyond them I mostly take exception to blasphemy.

As to who "wins" an argument around here, that's a bit like beauty. Lastly, on this point, we both know how many times you've reported other members here meshak, don't we...

Quote:

This is my assessment of TH.

I think you're someone convicted in your beliefs and passionate about them. But they lead you into a cowardly and low practice too often, as it has in your above.

And, as between us, I'm at least willing to consider what you have to say.

I'm going to attempt to decipher that. I'll begin with noting that while meshak has no problem discussing me, she does so from behind a shield protecting her from hearing my answer. Where I come from that's cowardly.

Proud? I'm proud of my education. Sure. I earned it, paid for it and it has done a great deal of good for a large number of people. I don't understand "He thrive for"...and intelligence isn't established by a show of hands, so if I understand what she's shooting for there, she's mistaken. Lastly, I valued intelligence and its development long before I went to law school.

The last part simply isn't true. She put me on ignore because I differed with her interpretation of scripture and put questions to her that she either wasn't prepared or inclined to answer.

But she still wants to argue against me. She just doesn't want to have to actually argue.

Rather, she's one of those people who, failing in argument, attempt to undermine what she perceives as the authority of the voice raised against her. The truth is that were I a brick layer my arguments would stand on their own merit and her silence and hiding would mark her regardless.

As to this peculiar doubts as to my credentials nonsense, started by Sod on one of his worse days, I've told anyone interested that my credentials have been confirmed by a member here who is known as an honest enough fellow. I've told anyone with that question to PM him.

Well, no. I've argued with alwight and AB and zip and any number of people, argued hard and fiercely on occasion and I've never reported a one of their posts. Because our differences, while strong, were rooted in a mutual respect. I reported Sod and SD and only a handful of others in my long stay here for serious and repeated rules violations. In Sod and SD's cases the violations were aimed at me. Beyond them I mostly take exception to blasphemy.

As to who "wins" an argument around here, that's a bit like beauty. Lastly, on this point, we both know how many times you've reported other members here meshak, don't we...

I think you're someone convicted in your beliefs and passionate about them. But they lead you into a cowardly and low practice too often, as it has in your above.

And, as between us, I'm at least willing to consider what you have to say.

You see this is so childish comment, making fun of misspelling. My goodness.

I felt that, perhaps, a clarification was in order. Realizing, of course, that you are above reproach and beyond enlightenment.
Jesus did say, "Suffer the little children to come to me...".
So, jeepers! thanks for the compliment!

I am spreading Jesus' whole messages which you main streamers misrepresented grossly with half truth.

You have no credibility to assess anyone. You are bully and vicious when it comes to people whom you hate..

It would take a good deal more than your capacity for self-absorption to inspire hatred in me.
We are to hate that which is evil. You are not evil. You are ill-informed and lacking in charity and grace. You spread your interpretation of Scripture. That can be a good thing.