Now that you bring up Winston Shrout, let's have a look at what this man has to say about this...

The OPPT has said they havefiled a national UCC1 Financial Statement that will lead to foreclose on several banks.

- There is a big difference between filing a UCC1 Financial Statement & recording a UCC1 Financial Statement. - There is a big difference between a National UCC1 form & a State UCC1 form - There is a big difference in a Lien & a Notice of Lien -Filing a national UCC1 Form does not create a lien, it does not create a liability, it cannot be used to make a foreclosure on something. It cannot be used to arrest the accounts of banks, i.e. Federal Reserve, IMF, BIS. -The filing of a National UCC1 Form (which the OPPT people say they have done) is strictly a Notice. It is not a lien, hence, cannot be used to foreclose on anything. -a Lien vs a Levy -a Lien goes after the title of the thing. -a Levy goes after the thing itself. -Its not possible to foreclose on anything by filing a UCC1 Financial Statement! It is simply a Notice.

The reason I am writing and speaking about trusts is that over the past weeks a number of you raised the issue with me given that the word ‘trust’ is now so prominent (with a number of major movements at the moment)...

From the very beginning to the present day a lawful trust can only be formed where the one who creates it has the authority and the rights to convey the form and property in the first place. Go back to the analogy we spoke of about the use of the car and say that you have two children, a son and a daughter. Let’s say that the son wants to borrow the car and the son goes to the daughter and says he wants to borrow the car. The daughter says, “Here are the keys, don’t smash it or get in trouble and bring the car back by 9 o’clock. She may have said every single thing that parent would have said, but that would have been an unlawful conveyance because the daughter did not have the right to grant that property to her brother.

Let’s say that we live in a neighborhood in a home and if someone who arrives in our neighborhood went to your neighbor and said, “I want to live in the house next door which happens to be YOUR house.” If your neighbor happens to have a spare key to your house and said that would be fine, they could live there, but don’t make a mess of it, and you have to be out of there at the end of two weeks because the owners are coming back home. That would be an unlawful conveyance and unlawful creation of a trust because they did not have the right to let people into your home while you were away and use the spare bedroom.

Let’s take the same analogy again and before you went away on a trip you went to your neighbor who said that their son and daughter were going to baby-sit the home and make sure everything is fine, the lights and the alarm are on, and they will make sure that the pets are fed, and you say that is great. So the parents next door say that everything will be fine and there is an understanding that the house will be treated well and there is respect. If your neighbor gave the key to their children to go to your home and live there and care for it properly, that would be a lawful conveyance because you granted the neighbor the right as your agent to do so and to create that form of trust; that would be lawful.

Let’s take another analogy. Let’s say someone comes to you and says they have formed a trust for the planet and they call it “ABC Trust” or “People’s Trust” or whatever name you like. They have created a trust for the planet, you are a beneficiary and they are the trustees and all your property has now been conveyed into that trust. That would be an absolutely unlawful, fraudulent, immoral, deceitful trust. It would not be a lawful trust. Why? It wouldn’t be a lawful trust because it is not clear what or who the grantor of the trust is the one who owns the property and has rights to do convey. Under the Roman Cult version of the world, it is the Roman Cult that claims that it is the trustees of all property and that the Divine Creator as the owner grants the Roman Cult the right to administer the property.

So, if the Roman Cult was behind this trust and it has created many global trusts, would that make it legitimate? It would certainly give strength to the claim that the Roman Cult can claim and rely on such instruments as the Bible, the papal bulls, theological works, historical instruments such as libraries full of hundreds of thousands of texts over hundreds of years that reinforce their primacy. But, all that is, is an elaborate claim. Is it legitimate? Is it valid? That is the key question and we address that when you look at sites such as www.one-evil.org and we address that with the Covenant of One Heaven on www.one-heaven.org.

If someone came to you and they had no theological work of hundreds and hundreds of pages, no library of hundreds of thousands specifically designed works reinforcing that specific claim and all those people did was to claim to be the trustees and give no indication of the rights of the grantor of the trust, of the argument of the grantor, then even with one breach it would not be a valid trust. It would be an unlawful trust. If they claimed it to be legitimate, then they would be deliberately committing fraud and every single person involved would be placing themselves in grave danger through such naiveté. One cannot convey property into a trust without the right permission. It is that simple from the outset.

There will be more to speak about concerning www.one-heaven.org and the covenant of One Heaven regarding trusts before we end the call. What we have said with trusts is that there needs to be some instrument if it is a formal conveyance. And, there must be a trust deed. If there is no trust deed then there is no legitimate trust.When it comes to the conveyance even if there is a trust deed, the one who is conveying the property, the grantor, or the claimed owner of the property, must have permission and authority. If they don’t, it is not a lawful conveyance. It cannot be. There needs to be a collection of property defined within the trust. It can’t be aerie fairie and it cannot be everything that everything that walks, lives and breathes, it needs to be specific. If it is not specific and you cannot define the property then clearly there is no trust.

In terms of the administration there may be an executor, a trustor, who are the highest fiduciary or there may be trustees involved. There will be accounts to that that trust in its administration. And there will be some creation or extract of title which is one of the primary benefits of the trust which is then given to the beneficiary in terms of the benefits and fruits of what that trust are. It won’t be the legal title, but the beneficial title. When a trust has those elements then it is a legitimate trust. If it doesn’t have those elements then it cannot be regarded as a legitimate trust.

...Sadly the world and sadly in more recent years, the world is full of disinformation, greed, ego, false hope and false representation and I physically don’t have the time or energy to point out each and every false trail. That is something that you as a test of your own competence need to consider for yourself. I have shown plenty of examples that ordinarily if people were thinking objectively should give cause for pause. I gave an example some weeks ago in regard to the private law form and I repeat it: the private law form of the American Legal Institute in the creation of the system known as the Uniform Commercial Code (the UCC). If anyone was to come to you and say that they had used that system to foreclose anything in their system then you are dealing with fraudsters, criminals, and imposters. I assure you that is there and whatever has been put in place will be rejected ultimately. More so, the existing system will come after them and maybe not for a month or year, but it will come after them and it will come after every single one of you who ignore common sense and refuse to listen to what is abundantly clear: the UCC is used when it is promoted in the truth movement as a honey trap to increase the amount of money that can be made from people who stupidly use it. It is a private form of law and it can never be used against itself.

...we have hammered home the argument that unless you have permission to convey something into a trust then you cannot convey it, no matter how grand your claim is. Three, four or five people coming up and saying they are foreclosing on the world—it’s a nice, arrogant idea. It’s not true. If you want to keep hammering that home, then clearly you are doing it for something else. It is not true; it is a lie. It is falsity. (Emphasis mine.) (Full article or listen to the full audio mp3 file - link(s) below)

Thanks Turyia. It sounds to me like Heather is claiming to have accomplished for everyone, what Frank O Collins has been working on for many years, and teaching everyone to do for themselves.... In the Ucadia Talkshoe recordings I've heard him say several times that if one person is ever freed, then we are all free, or something to that effect.

Now Heather keeps saying that we are all free under the OPPT. Meanwhile I don't like her seal as much as the once I have been working on for myself, and I keep wondering how much of her work has been influenced by Ucadia. This may be rather trite, but the tone of her voice doesn't have that certain credible quality to it, like Frank's does, either. She sounds nervous and unsure of herself, to me. But she is apparently having some success in court.

Lisa Harrison is one of the people on that OPPT roundtable discussion youtube video, along with Max Igan, Heather & another man (can't remember his name). Lisa Harrison has been getting more & more immersed into promoting this OPPT thing.

Although Chis Thomas is not known for his being an expert on the various law forms, he does have a connection with Lisa from a time before. Lisa Harrison did have an interview with Chris Thomas (as well as with Frank O'Collins) on a previous occasion. It was obvious during that interview that Lisa values Chris Thomas' insight on matters. And, I think it is because of that previous connection is the reason why Chris Thomas has come out with his strongly opinionated article against the OPPT - cuz no doubt Lisa would come to find it out sooner or later.

I had listened to that roundtable discussion video before, but discarded it as something that I had heard before by other people that were trying to promote their particular scheme to debunk the jurisdiction that the court system claims it has over 'we the people'.

After reading the Chris Thomas article, I went to see if I could find what Frank O'Collins has to say about all of this. As, no doubt there would be a number of people asking what he thought about it in particular. That's when I came across Frank's article from his Ucadia blogspot. Frank avoids naming names, but does make it rather clear, imo, that he is referring to the OPPT.

I also did a little research from another interview of Heather, and posted what I had found & what I felt about it:

Just an added note:

Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf, the spokesperson for the OPPT, tags St. Germaine as one of the search terms for locating the UCC filed documents. Also, she lists those of the "Angelic Realm", St. Germaine,The Immortals & The Elders as being those that are "The Divines" as she calls them.

I had previously posted here some of what Chris Thomas has found through his research of the Akashic... from his book Project HUMAN EXTINCTION: The Ultimate Conspiracy, he states that St. Germaine & the hundreds of Angels & Arch-Angels, that channel messages to various human beings, as being also Velon entities - out to exploit gullible humans that are more than willing to be deceived by channeled messages.

From an American Kabuki Blogspot interview, Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf says she was raised a Jesuit Catholic, was an attorney for international banking, worked overseas in high levels of banking trade, finance and international law, was offered a job as a bank director by a Rothschild client & worked with the Rothschild family to help resolve some issues. In that interview she also brings up the names of Fulford & Wilcock's Financial Tyranny.http://americankabuki.blogspot.com/2...tion-with.html

Well, it was at this point, as I hadn't yet got all the way through the entire interview, that I got the distinct feeling that this was just another twist to all the other scams to distract people that are sincerely trying to find out the truth. IMO, this OPPT thing is just another BS agenda, a Drake/Casper dupe, talk of prosperity funds, the packets are on the way, Iraqi Dinar, NESARA, the St Germaine Trust and a Leo Wanta Funds thingy.

At the beginning of the Drake thing, people didn't like it when people doubted that it was real. Just more "fear mongering" as one was labeled. Well, the same thing can be expected from this. Because I think its total BS! As I had said before about Drake... Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf may have her heart in the right place, but I think she is being encouraged to proceed with this, yet she is unknowingly being used like tool.

I'm just a bit surprised that Max Igan & Lisa Harrison have fallen head-over-heels about this stuff. Lisa has interviewed both Chris Thomas & Frank O'Collins in the past. Perhaps, she should consider getting them back on to specifically get their take on the OPPT thing. I suspect that Chris Thomas has expressed his opinion on this OPPT thing because of the interview he had previously with Lisa Harrison.

Even if the OPPT people got it wrong on this, its not a bad thing, because they are part of bringing the idea of one getting back their individual sovereignty to the forefront. With experts on UCC & other law forms, people like Winston Shrout & Frank O'Collins, how to actually find our way through this labyrinth of law forms will eventually be accomplished. The masses are, indeed, waking up.