So why did MT have to shuffle ALL the D pairings? I really liked Brooksie and Tangers together... and now we're back to Brooksie and Scuds. I mean, I really think that both Brooks and Scuds have vastly improved their games since they were last paired together, but if it ain't broke, why fix it?

IrishEyes wrote:So why did MT have to shuffle ALL the D pairings? I really liked Brooksie and Tangers together... and now we're back to Brooksie and Scuds. I mean, I really think that both Brooks and Scuds have vastly improved their games since they were last paired together, but if it ain't broke, why fix it?

Well to fair, we haven't exactly been limiting opponents to good scoring chances. Most of our accumulated points can be attributed to spectacular goaltending. I don't even know how many games (if any) we've outshot our opponents.

IrishEyes wrote:So why did MT have to shuffle ALL the D pairings? I really liked Brooksie and Tangers together... and now we're back to Brooksie and Scuds. I mean, I really think that both Brooks and Scuds have vastly improved their games since they were last paired together, but if it ain't broke, why fix it?

Well to fair, we haven't exactly been limiting opponents to good scoring chances. Most of our accumulated points can be attributed to spectacular goaltending. I don't even know how many games (if any) we've outshot our opponents.

True, I guess. I just want the D to work on getting decent passes out of the zone. That's all I ask for.