#40: Enforcing the code of conduct
-------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: duffy | Owner:
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: Legal | Keywords: coc, code of conduct
-------------------+---------------------------------
See this post from the outreach-list regarding the actual enforcement of
the code of conduct as currently written:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/outreach/2015-July/000067.html
Langdon asked that this be made a ticket for council discussion, with the
concern that an unenforceable / consequence without an SOP is a threat and
isn't the right way to go:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/outreach/2015-August/000073.html
For reference, the actual text is:
"FUDCon brings together contributors and users from all over the world and
this diversity is one of our greatest strengths. This diversity however
can also lead to communication issues and unhappiness. Attendees are
required to be considerate and respectful of each other. This includes,
but is not limited to:
- "Refraining from rude behaviour
- "Refraining from any sort of harassment or discrimination (based on
ethnic background, religion, gender, sexuality, body shape, disability,
geographic location, sports team, preferred operating system or anything
else)
- "Obeying local laws
"Attendees who are in violation of this policy may be subject to removal
and banning from FUDCon (and future Fedora events). Whether an attendee is
in violation is at the sole discretion of the conference organizers.
Anyone with a possible concern relating to the code of conduct is
encouraged to either email Rupali Talwatkar or talk directly to one of the
designated FUDCon volunteers. Designated FUDCon volunteers will have a
dark blue coloured VOLUNTEER badge."
The line of particular concern here is:
"Attendees who are in violation of this policy may be subject to removal
and
banning from FUDCon (and future Fedora events)."
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/40>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets

#43: Create the Fedora Public Budget Page
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: decause | Owner: decause
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: General | Keywords: budget, websites, FCL, transparency,
| community
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
As per the results of our council discussion here
(https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/council-
discuss/2015-October/013742.html) we are heretofore establishing a new
page (wiki or otherwise) that will track the timeline and particulars of
the Fedora Public Budget. It shall include:
Budgetary Components, Projected and Adjusted for each fiscal year:
- Regional Budget Allocations (APAC/EMEA/LATAM/NA)
- Fedora Premier Event Budgets (FLOCK, FUDCon)
- Central Discretionary Fund (approved by Council)
- FAD specific Budgets
Budgetary Milestones and Timelines:
- August: In person meeting at FLOCK
- September: Proposed budget components and metrics from each region
- October: Ratification of Proposed Budget by Council
- March: Confirmation of Received budget w/ Adjustment Meeting
- Quarterly Check-ins with Regional Treasurers
- Halfly approvals of Regional Funds, pending metrics and outcomes
reporting
If there are other details or resources that should be included on this
page, feel free to leave them in the comments below. I would propose that
this page eventually be made available at http://budget.fedoraproject.org
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/43>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets

#16: Periodic contributor survey
---------------------+-------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: General | Keywords:
---------------------+-------------------
This is a tracking ticket for establishing a process by which we get
regular feedback from the Fedora contributor base.
This is a companion to https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/1. The
desired goals, methodology, and basically everything else are really
different between users and contributors it will be better to track them
separately.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/16>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Project Board Public Tickets

#42: Schedule a FLOCK Budget Planning Session w/Council
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: decause | Owner: decause
Status: new | Priority: minor
Component: Board Meta | Keywords: FLOCK, session, budget, council,
| fiscal,
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
As per our discussion about Budget Planning here,
(https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/council-
discuss/2015-October/013742.html) one conclusion we came to was that
Budget Planning for the next fiscal year would begin during August at
FLOCK with a high-bandwidth in person meeting, that continued on maillists
and IRC through September, and was delivered to the FCL in October, to be
presented to Red Hat via OSAS.
This ticket is a reminder that we need to schedule a session at FLOCK for
the high-bandwidth in person session.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/42>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets

#50: Schedule a Flock Council Update & Town Hall for Krakow 2016
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: decause | Owner: decause
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: Board Meta | Keywords: Flock, Flock 2016, Council Update,
| council
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
This the is the traditional Flock session where members of the council
meet with community members and update folks on the status of Objectives,
as well as discuss issues and ideas for the future.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/50>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets

#49: Decision FUDCon APAC 2016
---------------------+-------------------
Reporter: gnokii | Owner:
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: General | Keywords:
---------------------+-------------------
following a conversation with Matthew I write this ticket:
The rules for choose a place to holding FUDCons says, that FAmSCo and
Board or now Council have to agree to the recommendation the local
Ambassadors do.
Until yet I only saw more questions which are answered and following that
a discussion, if we should keep FUDCon.
Please, keep in mind how that might look to the bidders, its already the
second time the cambodian community did a bid, when instead of a decision
a discussion comes up to wipe it out. It might look to this community that
we not want it there and we dont want cambodians in our community.
We already lost 2 months where a clear statement would have the local
community enabled to work on making a successful FUDCon 2016.
It is legitimate to discuss if FUDCon is still needed in the regions but
have an eye that the bid means there putting people work and effort into
it, especially in this case as there was a lot of requirements the indian
community wanted to see before agree to the bid.
So please go on and make a decision, to give the local community a chance
to work on it.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Bid_for_PhnomPenh_2016
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/49>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets

#38: Dopr
------------------------+-------------------
Reporter: msuchy | Owner:
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: Trademarks | Keywords:
------------------------+-------------------
Hi,
we (as Copr team) would like to introduce new service "DOPR".
It is very easy. It combine user Dockerfile and user's Copr and create new
docker image on DockerHub.
You can see staging instance at:
http://dopr-dev.cloud.fedoraproject.org/
We would like to start production instance. However some members of
fedora-infra would like to see this go through Council first.
There is some sense on this as this is kind of new way of distribution of
Fedora (beside Spins, Remixs...).
It creates all docker images directly on DockerHub so technically speaking
they are not created in Fedora infrastructure, but they are created under
Fedora account.
And we would like to market it as "Fedorea + Copr" or similar.
So my question: Does Fedora Council approve granting trademark usage on
resulting docker images?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/38>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets

I'm assuming Monday at the same timeslot.
Feb 22 -- Tickets and Ongoing
Feb 29 -- Open Floor (and Leap Day!)
Mar 7 -- Subproject Report (TBD)
Mar 14 -- Review of Council Objectives (University, Modularization)
Mar 21 -- Tickets and Ongoing
Mar 28 -- Open Floor
Apr 4 -- Subproject Report (TBD)
Apr 11 -- Open Floor
Apr 18 -- Tickets and Ongoing
Apr 25 -- Open Floor
May 2 -- Subproject Report (TBD)
(and probably on in an similar manner from there)
Note that March 14 is right after the US switch to Daylight Saving
Time. Should we move our meeting with it? But, since the composition of
the council changes, it may be that the answer is different every time.
And the topic I've penciled in for that day isn't necessarily something
to solve in a meeting, but I wanted to get it on the table -- let's
talk about before then. The University Involvement initiative was
slated for having results in the 2015-2016 academic year. And, you
know, best laid plans and all that. And, the modularization initiative
was specifically supposed to be in phases, and so that needs to be
refreshed too. AND, there might be other things we might want to add.
(Fedora Hubs, maybe?)
For the subproject reports, what would people like to see? I'd be kind
of interested in seeing a demo of the state o xdg-app in Workstation,
as I know there's talk of having a prototype ostree-based workstation
with xdg-app as a F25 feature. Possibly we could have a report from
FAMSCo/FOSCo as that does (or doesn't?) get back up off the ground.
What else?
Also note that we should have a budget session, some point after the
budget actually drops. Probably will take over one of the Open Floors
for that.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader

---Snip---
Hi Remy,
Please accept our apologies. Earlier today, you may have received a
notification of non-acceptance for a session we did actually intend to
accept.
To clarify, we look forward to hosting the following session(s) at Red Hat
Summit:
- SB44549: Fedora Friends!
Sincerely,
The Red Hat Summit team
---Snip---
Add this to the pile for Good News Leap Day Monday!
--RemyD.
--
Remy DeCausemaker
Fedora Community Lead & Council
<decause(a)redhat.com>
https://whatcanidoforfedora.org