Pages

Friday, 27 March 2015

I'm doing a bit of research on light boxes - the piece currently showing at the Cupola would, I think, look good on an optional light box. Not sure if I can put 2 sheets of duratrans/ acetate in it but I've ordered an A3 magnetic one for testing. It may be possible to have the duratrans in the light box and then tape the acetate on top? (a bit like an x-ray box). Or even just tape both on top? Liked the one above as it reminds me of a tablet/ computer monitor with the black rim - digital drawing and all that... and I also like the slim profile. The A0 size is quite expensive - but I don't think it's any more than a traditional frame of the same size. I do have a light panel somewhere which fits inside a frame (can be cut to size) which I got ages ago for my shadow drawings - must try to find it - but I think they are only available in smaller sizes and so no good for my large drawings.

Wednesday, 18 March 2015

I had a really interesting conversation last week about ‘themed’
shows. I tend to avoid them as I usually can’t make my work ‘fit’ or at least I
don’t think I can. My work is very slow to change – partly because it is so
time consuming and partly because I have limited time to spend on it (paying
the bills and all that) and so I wouldn't, for example, make new work in
response to an opportunity. This is not a criticism of those that do – just not
something that fits with the way I work. (I think it also ties in with feeling I
would have to justify how my work fits in - which is a whole other dialogue).

The gallery owner I was talking to said she set themes to
engage with the audience/ customer not necessarily the artist – that she
preferred a really broad interpretation by artists as this widened the
engagement. I have been thinking a lot
about this. It makes sense that a wide interpretation of a theme gives the ‘theme
setter’ a much broader field to engage, discuss, explore with the audience –
and also gives the ‘consumer’ access to a wide range of work which they may not
normally encounter. I still can’t see myself
making work to fit a theme but I think I will be giving a lot more thought to its potential.

Saturday, 14 March 2015

So is originality under-rated in the art world? I know many
will say there is nothing new – but I don’t think that is true. Whilst many
ideas and formats are revisited – the end result must surely add a new or unique
dimension – otherwise it is just a copy? As artists we should surely strive to bring
something new to the arena however small? Many artists reference other artist's work - the National Galleries Residency for example encourages responses to works in their collection. Should we expect some sort of space between when the original work was produced and when the new work is made? Or at the other extreme - is it as case of anything goes and copyright/ intellectual property rights are redundant and pointless?

Derby is currently in the throes of FORMAT festival and one
of the pieces of work shown has bought this issue to the forefront for me.
Joanna Geldard - an artist whose work I have a lot of respect for - produced a
fantastic piece of work shown in 2014. An internally lit greenhouse with etched
panels:

I had seen some publicity for FORMAT and one piece in
particular caught my eye – an internally lit greenhouse with etched panels. I was
really pleased to think Joanna had produced some work for the festival - that
she had got some recognition and representation in what is becoming an
increasingly high profile international event.

However, it turns out that this is a recent piece by a
totally different local artist. The FORMAT piece does look great – and for
those unfamiliar with Joanna’s work it no doubt appears a very interesting and original
work. Google ‘greenhouse art’ and whilst it is clear that quite a few artists
use a greenhouse to present work there are no immediately obvious ones using etched panels. It is of course possible
that two artists can have the same/ a similar idea and not be aware of each other’s work -
this seems unlikely in this case due to the fact that both artists live in the
same area and Joanna’s work got a lot of social media exposure as it was
being developed.

So where does ‘influence’ end and plagiarism begin? Is it OK
to create something so similar to someone else’s work that it is assumed to be their piece? Should an influence be
referenced – or at least acknowledged in some way? My personal opinion is that originality is really important and I have always felt that way. I can remember being really upset
as a teenager when a friend would copy everything I wore (even then the idea
of being a clone didn't appeal). My Mum said ‘imitation is the
sincerest form of flattery’ to try to make me feel better. It didn’t help…..

For the Cupola Gallery Exhibition I will be showing digital drawings - 'Hold' for the first time and'Gather'. I intended 'Hold' to be a layered drawing all along and it is very exciting to have just received the final prints for the show (original files = 1016 x 1372 mm, printed at 841 x 1189 mm (AO)). It has been a bit of a nightmare - but ended up as 1 drawing on duratrans and 1 drawing on acetate. This has the added advantage that it can be displayed as a lightbox in the future if required but also gave the lower layer a bit more 'weight' which looked better when shown pinned to the wall. Above is one version - because the top layer is acetate there are a number of possible options depending on which way the acetate is hung. I quite like the idea that whoever hangs the show will make that decision so I will not be specifying 'top'. Very difficult to photograph in my studio as expected (I thought large drawings on paper were hard!) but below gives an idea of what it looks like close up.