who got cut?

Rossum or Spurlock. At this point I could care less which of those 2 just as long as it's one of those 2. They've both seemed fairy useless. Hill is a better gunner on ST than Spurlock is anyway. And Rossum hasn't done Jack in the return game either. Anybody else would be a travesty.

Originally posted by TDilvr:Rossum or Spurlock. At this point I could care less which of those 2 just as long as it's one of those 2. They've both seemed fairy useless. Hill is a better gunner on ST than Spurlock is anyway. And Rossum hasn't done Jack in the return game either. Anybody else would be a travesty.

Well in Rossum's defense, he did return that kick for a touchdown against Seattle if I'm not mistaken. It was called back by a personal foul on Nate Clements, which had nothing to do with the outcome of the play.

Originally posted by TDilvr:Rossum or Spurlock. At this point I could care less which of those 2 just as long as it's one of those 2. They've both seemed fairy useless. Hill is a better gunner on ST than Spurlock is anyway. And Rossum hasn't done Jack in the return game either. Anybody else would be a travesty.

Well in Rossum's defense, he did return that kick for a touchdown against Seattle if I'm not mistaken. It was called back by a personal foul on Nate Clements, which had nothing to do with the outcome of the play.

It was called back on an illegal block in the back on Glen Coffee, which possibly gave Rossum the room to get free on that play. The personal foul on Clements was another flag later on in the play.

Originally posted by TDilvr:Rossum or Spurlock. At this point I could care less which of those 2 just as long as it's one of those 2. They've both seemed fairy useless. Hill is a better gunner on ST than Spurlock is anyway. And Rossum hasn't done Jack in the return game either. Anybody else would be a travesty.

I personally hope its Spurlock. Even though Rossum has dropped off, no one appears to have shown the ball security or return ability to replace Rossum. Spurlock is just useless and shouldn't have made the team IMO and probably would not had Crabtree signed on time.

I say Spurlock. Keep Battle just for the veteran presence and he has been pretty clutch on third downs in recent years. I just think there is more upside to battle than spurlock at least for this year.

Originally posted by NINERFORLIFE12:I say Spurlock. Keep Battle just for the veteran presence and he has been pretty clutch on third downs in recent years. I just think there is more upside to battle than spurlock at least for this year.

It looks to me like the same. Spurlock will get cut (I believe he has practice squad eligibility) and Crabtree will take his spot as the sixth inactive receiver on the team.

This site is neither endorsed, nor sponsored by, nor affiliated with San Francisco 49ers or NFL Properties LLC. 49ers is a registered trademark of the San Francisco 49ers LLC. All teams and players mentioned are registered trademarks of the NFL and its respective teams. The use of any team names, words, trademarks, logos or photos have been used for descriptive purposes only. The content and information from other sites is the property of their respective owners. Player and team photos used with permission from USA TODAY Sports Images.