Are you "mainstream" according
to Liberals, Media, & Hollywood?
"Mainstream American" or "Mainstream Democrat?"

"Liberty is a word which, according as it is
used, comprehends the most good and the most evil of any in the world. Justly
understood it is sacred next to those which we appropriate in divine adoration;
but in the mouths of some it means anything,
which enervate a necessary government; excite a jealousy of the rulers who are
our own choice, and keep society in confusion for want of a power sufficiently
concentered to promote good."Oliver Ellsworth (A Landholder, No.
III, 19 November 1787) Reference: Essays on the Constitution of the United
States, Ford, ed. (146); original The Connecticut Courant [Sheehan (4:4)]

Thomas Sowell - �Journalists cannot serve two masters. To the
extent that they take on the task of suppressing information or biting
their tongue for the sake of some political agenda, they are betraying the
trust of the public and corrupting their own profession. It is bad enough
that politicians betray their followers as a matter of expediency. It is
real chutzpah when they demand that journalists betray the public trust as
a matter of principle, for the benefit of politicians. Some
journalists�too many, in fact�do jump on the bandwagon of particular
candidates or particular political agendas, and end up filtering and
spinning the news as a result. Those who are on the �global warming�
bandwagon, for example, endlessly repeat that the polar ice cap in the
arctic is shrinking�while filtering out the fact that the polar ice cap in
the Antarctic is growing... Whether one is for or against the �global
warming� crusade or for or against Democrats or Republicans in the White
House, the truth is the truth�and filtering out facts is betraying the
public that has turned to the media for information. It is legitimate to
argue for or against those who believe that global warming justifies one
policy or another. That is an honest expression of opinion. But filtering
the facts is not. Some in the media seem to think that a noble cause
justifies withholding facts on the other side.�

Do you blame America first in regards to
terrorism, as many liberal media outlets and "higher-education professors" do?

Just to keep the
Bush-hatred rhetoric flowing, do you conveniently overlook the fact that
most of the world in early 2003, including liberals, believed Saddam had WMD
capabilities?

Do you believe the Gitmo detainees captured
as enemy combatants should be released? Yet at the same time ignore what
happens in
Castro's Cuban prisons?

Do you believe it is ok that abortion
on demand and
partial-birth abortion is funded by taxpayers?

Do you believe it is ok to continue funding liberal
media outlets such as NPR and PBS with tax dollars?

Legalizing gay marriages and/or civil unions
which will promote further sodomy and its dire consequences is ok with you and the
impact it will have on our descendents?

Is it ok to teach students in government run
schools that homosexuality is "normal" even though it violates "the Laws of
Nature and of Nature's God?" (Have you read
the Declaration of Independence?)

Do you support ACLU law suits bent on
deporting Christ, eliminating all public prayer, disallowing Christmas
celebrations, outlawing the Ten Commandments, and redefining the natural family?

Instead of defining morals and values from a
faith-based foundation, define them according
to whatever the ACLU, Ted Kennedy, Howard Dean, Hillary Clinton, Chuck
Schumer, Robert Reich, Bill Maher, Hollywood Elites, and George Soros dictate
as being "politically correct" with no specified boundaries as "the Laws of
Nature and of Nature's God" does?

Is it ok to use selective diversity and
selective tolerance in calling faith-based parents bigots for standing firm in
defining and defending morality and values as Biblically-based when raising
their children?

Does the "Establishment Clause" really mean
freedom from religion, and not what the First Amendment actually states,
"freedom of religion?"

Do you believe "Separation of Church and
State" is a law and not a "Big Lie?"

Do you believe religion is only for Sunday's
and not for Catholic politicians? Who is their Lord? And should Catholic
Politicians ignore their Lord's appeal to "shine their Light" instead of
"hiding it under a bushel?" Shouldn't Catholic politicians also be "the salt
of the world." And ignore what Jesus said: "...if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it
be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be
trodden under foot of men?" Isn't this in direct opposition to how the
Founders called upon the same Lord in establishing this great nation?

Is it ok to indoctrinate our children as
"world citizens" and eliminate America's Christian Heritage from history
lessons, while using the UN sponsored International Baccalaureate (IB) program
which for ages 3 through grade 12 promotes socialism, disarmament, radical
environmentalism and moral relativism, while attempting to undermine Christian
religious values and national sovereignty?

Are you afraid of school vouchers because
government-run schools may collapse because all faith-based parents will
remove their children from the secular indoctrination and GLSEN directed
lessons?

Are you concerned about the growth in home
schooling, especially among faith-based parents for the same reason?

Do you side with the ACLU in their assaults
against organizations like the Boy Scouts and Salvation Army? Do you also hope
in the name of liberally defined selective diversity and selective
tolerance, quoting Scripture when reproving sin, will be outlawed as a "hate
crime" leading to arrest and prison?

Do you believe all gun rights, even for law
abiding citizens, must be repealed?

Do you believe Labor Union bosses should be
able to continue using forced union dues to fund campaigns of liberal
candidates and liberal/socialistic causes?

Are you against eliminating taxes that
penalizes being married?

Are you against eliminating the inheritance
(death) tax, wealth that has already been taxed?

Are you in favor of using the filibuster
limiting judicial nominees to only those that will further the transforming of
the judicial branch into an extended arm of the liberal dictate.

Are you ok with judicial decisions which are
based on international rulings and not the Constitution?

Are you in favor of looking to the corrupt
United Nations for permission to defend America's sovereignty and also believe
it is in America's best interest to sign any and all UN Treaties regardless if
they violate individual and/or property rights?

Are you willing to overlook anything and
everything as long as liberals can regain control of the White House and
Congress and at ANY cost, including the threat of terrorism?

Do you welcome DNC support and direction
from groups such as NARAL, NOW, Planned Parenthood, GLSEN, Labor Union Bosses,
Hollywood liberals, George Soros, Michael Moore, Michael Newdow, and Move-On.org?

Do you favor a cradle-to-grave nanny state
of socialism with government-run schools, government-run retirement,
government-run healthcare, and UN-run "sustainable development" mandates? Do
you prefer your life and "liberty" to be controlled and directed according
to the Marxist and Hillary ideology of the "common-good?" And you disagree
with this Albert Einstein's observation?: "He who joyfully marches to music in
rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain
by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would fully suffice." And you also
disagree with this Thomas Jefferson's observation?: "Were we directed from
Washington when to sow, and when to reap, we should soon want bread."
(Hillary's Village or Rick's Family? Is this the real reason liberals are
attacking Rick?)

Do you believe you are more compassionate
and smarter then conservatives, except when it comes to donating within red
and blue states, as revealed from The Catalogue of Philanthropy which ranked
the 50 states, adjusting for gross income, on their collective donations to
charity? Do you care that the Democrats are
offering no plans of their own, except the plan to attack conservatives at
every turn?

You have no qualms misusing words such as
"tolerance, diversity, safety, hate crimes, and mainstream" in deceiving the
public?

Have you decided? If you are a "mainstream American" will you continue to
vote for "mainstream Democrats?"

Whether you agree or disagree with any of liberal views, have you let your
elected officials know what "mainstream" means to you?
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/ Otherwise
a judge may decide for you.