Blind Item #5

This former A list mostly movie actress from some of the biggest movies of all-time, who has rarely worked as of late says she doesn't want to work or go on dates because of what happened about a year ago when she went on a date. Her friend says the actress was sexually assaulted and hasn't been the same since.

Ok not usually one to bitch about the blinds, I guess his blog, he posts what he wants. But I, like everyone else here, am not going to try to guess a rape victim. I guess we all have lines we won't cross at some point.

@Harlow, there's gossip and then there's talking about sexual assault victims. Most of the visitors to sites like these are women. So if women – who represent the greatest numbers of sexual assault victims – don't want to read "blind items"/gossip about sexual assault victims, that makes them "self righteous"?

About Victims

44% of victims are under age 1880% are under age 30Learn more victim statistics

Sexual Assault Numbers

Every 2 minutes, another American is sexually assaultedThere is an average of 237,868 victims (age 12 or older) of sexual assault each yearRead more sexual assault numbers

Reporting to Police

60% of sexual assaults are not reported to the police97% of rapists will never spend a day in jailLearn more reporting statistics

About Rapists

Approximately 2/3 of assaults are committed by someone known to the victim38% of rapists are a friend or acquaintance

Read the blinds. Comment if you like , but enough of trying to set the tone of the comments section and vilifying anyone who has an opinion different from yours. Too many people are always looking for a fight, as long as they have back up.

One unintended consequence of gossip sites is that they will be eventually read by wrong kind of people. It's a miracle that Hollywood has never been a target for major terrorist attacks. I wonder why.

Oh big deal, 1/2 the broads at a club on a Friday night get sexually assaulted. Gimme a ring when you get some rape up in here, Fugazi Enty. I'm starting to get sick of that Benson broad. The promotion to Sgt has done nothing to bring her to reality. "You are a bad ADA, because you won't go to trial with this half a shred of kinda evidence." After 15 yrs on the job you would think she'd have a clue.

I love all the commenters here who are shocked — shocked! — every time there's one of these blinds, and disgusted —disgusted — by how loathsome Enty is every single time there's one of these blinds, demand that Enty call the police (as if "Someone's friend told someone who told someone who told me…" had somehow, since the last such blind, become legally-admissible evidence) every single time there's one of these blinds…

And yet, despite how horrified and disgusted you all are by what a scumbag Enty is, you're all going to be here commenting again tomorrow, helping him get ad revenues from page views.

Jonathan Andrew Sheen, I was genuinely asking. I'm new and I wasn't sure about what happens if someone like the lawyer gets this information, and duty of care. I actually don't enjoy reading things like this at all.

Thanks Seven of Eleven! Does this mean I need to be careful what I say on here? I'm a social worker, so here we have mandated reporting in Australia, so I was wondering, if this us being put on the internet, it must have some truth, and therefore, duty of care May factor into it. It's all pretty horrible in reality, whether famous or not.

Bee Haven: I wasn't talking to you specifically. I don't know if I even specifically noticed your post. But stick around, and you'll see the same people posting the sames things over and over again, complaining bitterly about various things — the same various things — done by the writer of this blog, who goes by the name "Entertainment Lawyer" ("Enty" for short,) as if he is the lowest form of life on earth, and entirely beneath contempt. Again. And again. And again.

You'll see complaints about not calling the police about blinds regarding criminal behavior, be it assault on an adult or child abuse. You'll see complaints about outing. You'll see complaints about blinds that portray or imply mental illness. You'll see complaints about spelling, grammar and diction. And you'll see complaints that Enty is a ringer, that there was once an original Enty, and he is no longer in control, and blinds are now written by one or more fake Enties, like the complaints of "Brady Bunch" fans about the episodes of the "Brady Bunch Variety Hour" for which Eve Plumb refused to return, leaving fans to heap scorn upon "Fake Jan."

To listen to the large swathe of commenters here, you'll see that they hate Enty, that they have nothing but loathing and contempt for him (or her or them) that they consider him the worst sort of lowlife.

And you'll see them show up day after day after day after day to repeat the same litany of complaints and outrages.

You may find it clever or superior or amusing, and if so, more power to you, but I find it tiresome enough to call out on occasion.

And, by the way, as Seven of Eleven points out, when I post to a specific commenter, I link their name to their Blogger profile, exactly as the site does automatically when someone posts a comment. I do so only because it pleases me to see usernames treated the same way in the bodies of comments as in headers, but those with too little to concern them seem to find it risible.

I don't understand that if this is an open forum, why I can't state that I think Enty is a dick for posting this as a blind? I did erase my other post earlier, because it was uncalled for and rude and for that I do apologize.

However, I am not sorry to call Enty out on this, I find a blind item making us guess who the victim of sexual assault was to be extremely crude. Most items that are posted on this site aren't offensive to me, therefore I come back. This particular subject always has and always will bother me. I find it be extremely offensive to be used as gossip.

Now I am off to read some more, and perhaps comment some more, on other posts here at CDaN. Or maybe, I'll just keep quite for a while since I am quite bitchy today. Rarh!

Uh oh Jonathan; I just started my google account and Facebook this year as a resolution not to live in the dark ages! I am not sure what's going on. And I did read your statement carefully. One thing I'm concerned about : there are stories discussed on here about child abuse? That would concern me no end. As I said, mandatory reporting, duty of care. I might be in the wrong place?I'm on holidays for over two glorious weeks and I found this from googling old Hollywoid gossip, which led to Blind items, then here. I'll see how I go!

Also, Seven of Eleven: thank you for stating those statistics. I've worked with victims and perpetrators of sexual abuse and rape, and regardless of position in society, it's a real and alarming issue.Thanks for being nice to a dumby!

To answer your question, Bee Haven, a fair number of the Blind Items on this site concern tales of sexual encounters involving people who are under-age.

Not infrequently, there's discussion of a producer of "tweener" programming for free cable-TV networks catering to the pre-teen-to-early-teen audience who is said to have a viciously rapacious appetite for sexually abusing the casts of his shows. These blinds often imply that the network and/or studio pays money to hush up the crimes but leaves the abuser in a position to abuse more, because his shows bring in big money.

There's a popular consensus as to the identity of this abuser, but I'll leave it to someone else to name him if they wish: I prefer not to make myself liable for a lawsuit.

Thanks everyone. It's a case of, time off work, posting too many vegan/humanitarian/greens party/political stuff on Facebook so I took a break! I think this will be fun! I got my house clean and sorted the first two days, and now, I've got too much time on my hands!

Seven of Eleven, was that who named him? Yeah, that guy, who, for a long while, was named again here any time there was a blind about a current tweener being the target/victim of such abuse.

Guy who was an actor in a school-based network sitcom in the '80s.

I have no opinion on the accuracy of the gossip naming him, so I'm just saying that I'm referring to comments and blinds on this site making the allegations. I'm not endorsing — nor am I refuting — those claims.

@Eros: Interesting theory. Do you think the men of the 1860s had opinions about the respectfulness of revealing the rape and/or sexual assault of any of the women in their lives? Of course if they did, there's always the option to leave the room. There's always that option.

Seven of Eleven, what about complaining about the same thing over and over again, and still coming back for more? Is that like anything?

Even if, say, the demands that Enty call the cops were appropriate — and, as Red points out, they're not — if he was going to, he'd have done in yonks ago. It's not like commenters here haven't been scolding him to do so for years. It's not like many of the very same commenters haven't done the very same thing every time such a blind comes up for years.

What's it called when you do the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result?

You are still conversing with me, though. Failure that I apparently am… I don't understand your command to ignore people who aren't conversing with me when you are conversing with me. 😕

And why the anger? I simply pointed out an argument that you've previously stated. I never said it was wrong or right or anything in between, so why should I go "go play in traffic" for asking about your policies on women and their respectability?

@JAS, I don't think the demands to call the cops are necessarily appropriate (or reasonable), they're just the reaction of people who see that the victimization and subsequent exploitation of (pick a victim) are not OK.

Why do they (we) come back? I guess for the same reasons you watch a show you like hoping it will get better, hoping the comments you sent in, the email blast, the FB comments, all convinced The Powers That Be to make it a better show rather than just trash the whole thing all together.

So when we come here, , Seven of Eleven, we know we're going to get blinds about rape/sexual assault, both against adults and against children. Enty's been posting them for years.

Maybe he thinks that giving as much information as can be given publicly without legal liability is the best he can do to get justice done. Maybe he thinks it's vastly entertaining. Maybe he is indeed only interested in the clicks, and doesn't care about the misery.

In any case, he's been doing it for years, and there's no reason for anyone to think he's going to stop.

Likewise, his blinds about people with mental health issues, illnesses, sexual-identity issues, and people in various sorts of closets show no sign of abating, and his writing style has shown no sign of being amenable to correction.

If there's been a change of Enties, if it's the same person it always was, or if it's a committee or the Borg Collective, none of that will ever be acknowledged, any more than it ever has.

So why wouldn't I snark a bit about the usual suspects chewing over those wads of cud again and again and again and again.

Maybe I am taking offense to this when I shouldn't be, but I must state I think this is the 2nd time I have ever made a comment on these types of posts. Usually I just vomit on this side of the screen and move along. Just needed to point out I am not a repeat offender of calling Enty out.

However, I may now start to be a repeat offender just to piss certain people off!!!!!

Gee, I think this needs to be seen as a place to say things without fear of personal attack! Seven of Eleven has been both eloquent, relevant, and nice to me. Not to pick sides, but it is just the internet & we can all be nice?

And warehouse alleycat you get a pass because I know they don't teach trailer trash alley cats like yourself common sense philosophies like how to refrain from engaging people who don't like to converse with common trash. You really are a simple bitch. So again Im going to be the bigger person and make this my last comment. Stupid cunt

"Maybe he thinks it's vastly entertaining" – this right here is why I personally have no problem with people kvetching about the contents of the blinds. If no one says anything, how does the Entern know it's not wanted? At what point does E say, it is what is, suck it up, Buttercup? Because at that point, people will leave.

I've seen my innocuous comments deleted while pieces of crap from Massive G stand and frankly, I've found myself not as patient anymore. (Eros: PARTY TIME!) I think you're not a dumb fellow and I wonder if you looked at it from a different set of lenses (non randoms hipster black frames julia glasses), we'd agree on a different level – you're snarking commenters chewing the wads of cud, and the commenters are snarking enty chewing/rechewing the cud. (Don't google this, people. Seriously. It's gross.)

Beehavin you seem like a very sweet girl. So I will clue you into some of how this place rolls. You have a group of very nasty unpleasnt people who basically have entys site held hostage. If you agree with everything said and don't make waves then you're good to go but if your opinion differs they will gang up on you. They recently did that to a new poster- shailene and they do that to most if the opinion isn't in the consensus. Very very nasty cult like people. Just wanted to make you aware.

As long as they ignore me I will do the same but I am not the one to cross. Thats about it. Peace

@ Ray Nicolet Your surmisal of me being a bitter betty is based on what? Because I actually defend myself when verbally accosted? I was actually replying to jas when those 2 stupid slags had a go at me. Sorry I can't be a wet nosed puff like yourself abetting stupidity on a daily basis in the form of alleytrash but I actually have standards. Lol cheerio…

Eros: I don't want to cross anyone! Not into confrontation, but if it concerns the rights of others, which I'm not sure if this site is truthful or not (such as abuse of children) I will say something, even if it's disregarded.

Jessi, I'm not singling anyone out. If what I'm describing doesn't match what you're doing, you can safely assume I'm not talking about you, so where's the beef? Since you asked why people shouldn't be able to do something, I answered you directly, and I stand by my answer. It isn't rude or nasty to say that, just as you have a right to comment on what you want to, so do I.

Bee Haven: You'll note that I haven't personally attacked anyone. The same can't be said vice-versa. You'll also note that you don't seem to extend the courtesy of being able to say what one has to say without fear of personal attack to Enty — and this is, after all, his blog! If he can't, who can? But, as I mentioned to Jessi above, I think I'm entitled to comment on things I think deserve calling out, too. So why isn't this a place for me to say things without fear of personal attack?

Seven of Eleven, you say, If no one says anything, how does the Entern know it's not wanted?

Didn't we pass that point back when 14,400 Baud modems were the fastest things on the Internet? If Enty didn't pick up on that in my first three weeks reading this blog, he never will.

Likewise, there's the "Enty can't write" routine, the "Enty misuses words" routine, the "Enty dies in 2010, and the site is now written by a team of imposters" routine, and all the various other versions of "Enty sucks, this site sucks." I have no problem with anybody feeling that way, and I have very little problem with anybody saying so… But the same people saying it day after week after month after year make me want to say, "You knew what was here before you clicked the bookmark, you have nobody to blame but yourself."

(The folks who are only now making the discovery that they hate this site and/or Enty are not the objects of that particular scorn. They will be if they keep saying how much Enty and CDaN suck while they keep returning and returning. I don't think that's really unfair.)

Bee Haven, you have the right to say whatever you want. That's the beauty of opinion s. I don't bother attacking people based on difference of opinion.

I know you're new but there is history and those 2 dumb bunny girls. That is why I responded the way I did. They both know I dont care for them, yet they started yet another conflict with me. DDoesn't make logical sense to me to be honest. If I dislike someone online or otherwise, I avoid them like the plague. Prepubescent children behave that way- instigating fights. And warehousealley called me a troll but again I didn't instigate anything with her or that other tard.

Anyways I digress… my point is that you have every right to verbalize my opinion as do I. They are the ones who can notfunction if it is a dissenting opinion.

RME @ Sheen!!! I wasn't personally attacking you!! If saying I am going to comment every time on future sexual posts like this is a "personal attack" on you, well then wow!!

And WTF ever, I am not ever one to "personally attack" someone here in the threads. As stated earlier, I am a bitch today and regret anything said prior. I am not a malicious attacking poster, unless of course you poke the bear in a zoo, which you have done.

Seven asked u a question & u refused to answer & basically told her to fuck off & die, but yet she attacked u.Seven has never had issues w/ ne commenter. Ever.Did u completely forget the thread where not ONE person agreed w/ the bs u were trying to shove down our throats???U got all hostile on EVERY ONE, told many of us to get fucked, but then tryed to say we attacked u.U called many of us horrible names & we're all supposed to sit there & take it?U never interact w/ ne one & when u do, its just nasty.I dn't think us 2 dumb bunnies r the problem. It's u.

JAS I hate to say it but you are the one everyone loves to hate around here. I don't get it and I don't like it and I'm not sure why thou ate the chosen one. I typically agree with most of what you say with a few exceptions and I'm sure most others do to but rallying with you is like siding with the devil for some reason. Like I said, I don't like it and I'm impressed you continue to frequent the site despite your every word being constantly criticized. Most of the people who criticize are really cool and great people but not everyone likes or agrees with everyone, I just don't get why every single thing you say gets torn apart. Been wanting to say that for a while, just haven't had a chance really.

It's usually best to read the blind items on this site for fun and not comment or respond to comments. If you do want to comment then it's best not to engage with the cliques. There is a weird and dysfunctional Mean Girls thing that goes on in this blog.

Christ! Sexual abuse is a fact of human behavior that sucks and is depressing. But hysterical shaming of the mere mention of a victim suggests that the topic should be unspoken and stigmatizes the subject as filthy and off limits. Grow the fuck up and stop hanging your shit on everybody else! Adults can handle the topic in all forms: statistics, documentary, comedy and gossip! It isn't going away and your attitude is juvenile and encourages victims to be silent since they don't want to bring other's down with such a heavy topic. Stop faking being a real person of substance with these elaborate and annoying tactics of forced sanctimony and try helping the world by speaking up, loud and being active and unflinching in the face of humanity's evils!

Truer words were never spoken. That is what I usually do on here: Share my opinion and keep to myself unless provoked. I need to work on that not rrsponding thinga little better but Im a bit of a rebel. Lol.. 😉

Recent Comments

DISCLAIMER

CRAZY DAYS AND NIGHTS IS A GOSSIP SITE. THE SITE PUBLISHES RUMORS, CONJECTURE, AND FICTION. IN ADDITION TO ACCURATELY REPORTED INFORMATION, CERTAIN SITUATIONS, CHARACTERS AND EVENTS PORTRAYED IN THE BLOG ARE EITHER PRODUCTS OF THE AUTHOR'S IMAGINATION OR ARE USED FICTITIOUSLY. INFORMATION ON THIS SITE MAY CONTAIN ERRORS OR INACCURACIES; THE BLOG'S PROPRIETOR DOES NOT MAKE WARRANTY AS TO THE CORRECTNESS OR RELIABILITY OF THE SITE'S CONTENT. LINKS TO CONTENT ON AND QUOTATION OF MATERIAL FROM OTHER SITES ARE NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CRAZY DAYS AND NIGHTS.