Fact is a few hundred AQ jihadis could easily kill a couple of thousand people each in simple acts of terror that require minimal preparation training
or equipment.

For a start I predict that they will go for trains as one facet of their next strike - a lot of them all at once, probably morning rush hour hi-speed
packed commuter trains derailed and synchronised all over the country.

Mumbai style attacks are another obvious one - I won't mention what else they could do, the point is they could do stuff like this with ease and
there is no way to stop them, until the US has the balls to face upto the fact that they are not at war with a tactic but an idiology just as nasty as
Communism or Nazism.

Originally posted by jude11
We all know that the US needs a new Bogey man to replace Osama and I think Nasir al-Wahishi is it.

How else can the "War on Terror" be justified?

There are a lot of people asking why the US is continuing to reign in the freedoms of its citizens if the Monster is gone? Why haven't they relaxed
the TSA Grope Fests? Why is the DHS still inventing more ways to spy on its own citizens? All sorts of questions.

Can't have people demanding their freedoms be returned to them. Nope, Ain't gonna happen.

Interesting Quotes:

Arnold Toynbee (1889-1975) said, "The nations are ready to give the kingdoms of the world to any one man who will offer us a solution to our world's
problems." The first president of the United Nations General Assembly, Paul-Henri Spaak, who was also a prime minister of Belgium and one of the
early planners of the European Common Market, as well as a secretary-general of NATO, affirmed, "We do not want another committee, we have too many
already. What we want is a man of sufficient stature to hold the allegiance of all the people and to lift us up out of the economic morass into which
we are sinking. Send us such a man, and whether he be God or devil, we will receive him."

President George Bush said in a speech before the U.S. Congress during the Gulf War, "We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. Out of
these troubled times a New World Order can emerge. Today that New World Order is struggling to be born." (What George was really struggling to say
was ' I want it my way and only my way and i'll kill everyone on the planet to Win') Silly really ...

Originally posted by bekod
yes that is right you asked for it now you got it abcnews.go.com... you
think the mid east is bad with EID's and home made rockets that fail in Israel, you have seen nothing yet, yes this is prediction that within in the
next few weeks if not sooner, we in the US and western country's will get a taste of what life is like in the mid east, we have come close but with
this and his words it sent chills down my back and made my hair stand up for this is the days of judgment and WMD's bio chem and dirty nukes, if one
can kill 100 then that is there goal, and that is just the start , marshal law is one,yes they will be no safe place, you have been warned that this
will happen when do not know nor where if i did i would try to tell where and where i thinking indy 500 , but that is to my thinking too soon unless
this is a 9/11 all over again, false flag, or is this for real. i will wait for the "slams" and the "how could you know." this is a heads up i do
not know how to put it any plainer or simpler.

edit on 11-5-2011 by bekod because: text correction

edit on 11-5-2011 by
bekod because: text correction

Paragraph structure would be extremely helpful in deciphering this.
2nd.

so you would kill any that looked like a person from the mid east or ????? does that include one that has a back pack a big box or a suite
case??? just asking for this is what it is coming to. this is they war they know how to fight it and die for it we can only guess.

You are reaching and taking it out of context. NO!! I would not attack anyone that "looks" like a terrorist. Only those that deem themselves as one.

no just getting you use to the thought, how often do you hear that a package was left and the bomb squad was called? It is a game to see how
long it take's them to get to the seen

I'm with "Letsbringit" on this on.... you are fear mongering, we are used to the thought, we're conspiracy theorists, we (believe or not) can
imagine much worse things than this. However, I get the impression you're just coming to terms with this and are projecting your thoughts and
feelings on the matter like it's some sort of new realisation for you... then again I could be wrong.

They won't even have the man power to fight a true war because they blow themselves up. They have nothing to even fight a war. All they are to us is
a thorn in our side. Terrorism isn't affecting that much. The reason we're over there is to send a message to anyone that wants to be a terrorist
that they're gonna die. Whether it's by their own hands or by ours it's inevitable. And to assume any Muslim looking person with a back pack or
anything else is a terrorist is racist and that will not be tolerated in the new world that's in the process of being built. So go ahead and stay in
your house 24/7 because I'm going to be out having fun and living a life. No WW3 is starting at their hands. It's coming but not yet so enjoy the
life you have while you can. They have nothing to start WW3.

Will someone tell these guys it is not the regular everyday people who are behind this. Tell them if they wish to go after the traitors, in DC, be our
guest, might help us get things fixed. But for the citizens, we did nothing to promote this, we want the real truth of 9/11.

so how would you know???? by the time the shout there death yell and they will it is to late, for they can not revive there "72" if they do
not. just asking how on earth do you pick out a person the has the thought, the will to kill, from the many that do not want to kill die nor do harm.
if you know how call the feds they would like to know as well remember no racial profiling is allowed it could

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.