Wednesday, April 29, 2009

911 Mysteries Discussed Without Political Bias - Part 5 (Postscript and Encore)

By Fred Marshall Jr.April 26, 2009

As mentioned earlier, I initially made the mistake against which I recurrently caution people - - to never assume anything or take anything for granted or take anyone’s word as gospel without seeing evidence. I stupidly assumed there WERE airplanes because, like everyone else, I genuinely [thought I] SAW airplanes. Throughout the four years of my research project, that flawed assumption tainted my thought processes in every aspect of the 9-11 arena. Even when I heard and read discussions by others who espoused the no-plane reality, I dismissed the notion out of hand as nothing more than an absurd, unfounded theory. Big mistake. Frame-by-frame analyses of a variety of videotape are abundant all over the Internet, and show the fakery with indelible clarity, though many that existed two years ago are now gone.

In initially dismissing the fakery as a bogus issue, I hindered my own understanding of several aspects of that day. First, the planes’ behavior when allegedly hitting the Twin Towers and the Pentagon defied not only the laws of physics, they defied common sense. In the real world, mere birds smash large holes in airplanes, yet these airplanes sliced through solid reinforced concrete and a massive netting of steel, which formed the outer facades of the buildings, like a knife through warm butter. Undamaged, undaunted, and un-slowed by virtually immovable resistance, they continued onward into the buildings and sliced through the even more massive box-steel girders which formed the indestructible cores of the towers. None of this is possible, not even remotely possible. Yet we were told it happened and we are reluctant to believe our government and the “independent” press deliberately lied to us.

Airplanes are much like flying beer cans - - thin, hollow and lightweight - - and would have flattened themselves against those outer walls, would have crumbled like a stepped-on saltine cracker and would have fallen in tiny pieces to the streets below. Only the two jet engines, each consisting of 12,000 pounds of iron, steel and titanium, measuring nine feet in diameter and 23 feet in length, would have stood any chance at all of penetrating those walls which, incidentally, were designed to move and absorb energy (from high winds and even jet aircraft impact). At the Pentagon, the [imaginary] engines did not even break windows at the locations the engines would have impacted had a Boeing 757 hit the building. Let’s see what the government had previously PROVEN - - in this 54-second video - - would happen when a jet aircraft hits a concrete wall at 500 mph.

Is this what you [think you] saw on 9-11? Granted, the concrete wall in the video above is much thicker than the walls of the Twin Towers and the Pentagon were, but it didn’t contain the heavy steel netting the Twin Towers walls contained, nor the rebar reinforcement the Pentagon walls contain. What’s important to understand in the video above is not the strength or performance of the concrete wall, but the behavior of the lightweight aircraft frame covered with thin aluminum. While airplanes simply cannot slice through buildings made of steel and concrete, computerized images can easily do it. The latter is what we saw on 9-11.

Then there is the problem of reflection. On the bright, sunshiny day that was September 11, 2001, sunlight reflected off of everything we saw in all the “original” videos - - buildings, the Hudson River, water craft, everything - - EXCEPT the dark silhouettes of the airplane images that were ADDED to the footage we were shown. Aluminum-covered airplanes reflect sunlight almost like mirrors.

In fact, in one piece of footage that was aired by NBC that morning, the camera shows the Twin Towers with the Hudson River in the background off to the right. The tower on the right has smoke billowing from it when, suddenly and without warning, there appears to be a huge explosion in the other tower. Here is what a close examination of this footage reveals: It’s a bit odd that both towers appear in the left half of the video frame. Any camera operator who would have been recording the fire in the first tower would have had the Twin Towers centered in the picture frame. But not this one. In this one, it’s pretty clear that a lot of space to the right of the buildings was filmed so as to allow for the adding of an airplane later.

What is seen in the footage discussed above is an unobstructed view of the Hudson River on a sunny day, with moving water craft clearly visible. Then there is the explosion in the second tower, the one on the camera’s left. But there is no airplane approaching across the Hudson River. The sky is blue and visibility is almost unlimited. When the early evening news is later broadcast, however, that very same video footage is aired again only, this time, the entire background has been eliminated and replaced with a haze (it appears to be a heavy overcast), and miraculously there is an approaching airplane image - - though it’s only a dark silhouette - - that appears to hit the left tower just as the explosion billows out the left wall of the left tower. Same footage, same camera angle, same shape of the smoke rolling out of the right-hand tower, same everything, EXCEPT the hazed-out background and the added image of an airplane. What is so striking is the relative positions of everything within the framed area selected for filming. It is perfect for showing one tower already burning and the approaching aircraft headed for the other tower. But no camera operator would have chosen that precise framing unless he expected something to be developing in the right half of the screen.

Another telltale giveaway is the sound. Over the video aired that morning - - presumably in real time - - the anchors’ voices tell all. As the explosion occurs in the left tower on the video, an anchor’s voice says “Oh, my God, there’s another one, there’s another explosion.” He’s watching his monitor and is seeing exactly what the viewing audience is seeing. The other anchor chimes in and says, “Folks, we’ve just had another explosion and it’s in the other tower.” Yes, one could have been looking elsewhere and not seen an approaching aircraft, but it just isn’t credible to surmise that both anchors missed a plane which absorbed several seconds of the videotape in its approach flight.

We needn’t have an advanced education in physics - - unfortunately, the majority of American adults can’t distinguish physics from paleontology anyway - - all we need is a little common sense. Perhaps Superman could throw a baseball into a concrete building and it would punch right through and sail out the other side unharmed. But the rest of us know that if we were to throw a baseball against the outer wall of a concrete building, it would hit the wall and bounce back in our direction. Such knowledge and common sense have to be set aside in order to believe the story we were told about the events of September 11, 2001. That so many of us were so gullible is astounding, embarrassing even. I’m certainly perplexed that I overlooked so much as I spent countless hours deliberately looking for inconsistencies and possible explanations.

Then there are the problems with regard to the myriad of alleged failures in the air defense system. I could - - because of the plane assumption - - find no explanation for the criminally negligent blunders we were told had occurred. My 20 years of military experiences kept subliminally telling me that the air defense systems I knew to be the best and most modern in the world had not failed on virtually every front - - as alleged - - but, instead, had worked to perfection as they always have, including the 64 times fighter jets had been scrambled in 2001 prior to September 11th. I knew that even if a tiny part of the system should fail - - and an errant aircraft or missile should penetrate the net and reach its destination - - heads would roll. Generals would be relieved, as would others right down the chain of command. Somebody would be court-martialed. The media would be all over the story like stink on cow manure. Yet none of this happened. No one was relieved. No one was disciplined or even reprimanded. The American people blindly accepted the ruse without question.

Yet I ignored the obvious for years, for which I became ashamed when the truth finally penetrated the dense fog I had allowed to surround my brain.

In my gut I knew the failures had not occurred, yet I subconsciously avoided venturing into that territory. I wasted a lot of valuable time pondering theories involving the takeover of the planes by remote control, or the substituting of specially-equipped unmanned drones. But, despite all the possibilities I considered, I was left with a long laundry list of pesky questions that just would not go away. When I finally realized that there was no plane, that indeed there could not have been a plane - - let alone four of them - - then 90% of the nagging inconsistencies I hadn’t been able to resolve….evaporated.

It was like a first experience of seeing bagworms. You can’t see them. They look so much like the cedar or juniper trees and shrubs they infest and soon devour. You can look directly and closely at the leaves and you won’t see the worms. Until one moves. Then you can see a thousand of them because then you know what to look for….and if there’s one, you can be sure there are a thousand. If you watch for a few minutes, you can see hundreds of them moving slightly as they feast on the greenery.

The air defense system did not work that day because nothing triggered it. It is activated by the discovery of errant or unidentified aircraft and other flying objects. There are three systems operational 24/7 to detect such irregularities, one each controlled by NORAD, FAA, and NSA. That day, there was no stray anything in the air.

The system can also be activated by order, but such is extremely rare (computerized imagery added to videotaped footage and broadcast nationwide does not activate the air defense system). The system works so well that a plane or missile headed for the Pentagon would have been automatically shot down by the missile batteries protecting the building, which would have AUTOMATICALLY launched missiles the minute any unauthorized flying object penetrated restricted air space without prior clearance. That would have occurred electronically even if every member of the firing battery were sound asleep. No plane hit the Pentagon. No plane COULD HAVE hit the Pentagon. It would have been shot down seconds after entering restricted airspace.

I mentioned “heads rolling.” We were later told that there were nine practice exercises in progress that morning, involving 22 mock hijackings, simulated by electronically placing fake blips on the radar screens manned by air traffic controllers and others. We were further told that the exercises had committed all but 14 of the available fighter aircraft in the entire United States inventory, and had them deployed to places such that protection for the entire continental United States was left to those 14 aircraft. We were led to believe it was merely bad planning that left the continental United States vulnerable. Nothing even close to such a bungled scenario is possible.

Nobody, of any rank or position at any level, would have - - could have - - scheduled multiple conflicting drills that would have crippled our defense. Superiors would not have approved such an idiotic proposal, and subordinate commanders would have screamed like castrated pigs that their ability to defend the nation would be compromised.

The military’s most proficient skill is “simulating.” They may have deployed one or two dozen aircraft in an actual exercise, and simulated deploying 150 others - - perhaps to test how things would function if the force were to be critically overtaxed. But they would not really deploy the 150 aircraft because it would degrade their combat readiness. Simulated aspects of operations always go off without a hitch precisely because they are imaginary.

The fighter aircraft that are on standby for scrambling - - across the nation and elsewhere - - are positioned near a designated runway so that no time is wasted on long taxiing that can be avoided. The maintenance crews are with the aircraft. The pilots are fully dressed and close by. When the alert horn sounds, designated maintenance crewmembers fire up the engines to each aircraft as the pilots run to their planes and the tower is clearing the needed runway (if necessary). The pilots buckle in and move to takeoff position and immediately bolt down the runway, lifting off as soon as takeoff speed is reached. Then they throttle up to max power and head for 10,000 feet. THEN they receive orders by radio as to where to go and what the mission is. From alert horn to 10,000 feet is about two minutes. That’s a standard that has been maintained dating back to the early days when SAC (Strategic Air Command) manned the DEW Line defense system (Distant Early Warning).

This is serious business for all the people involved in this system at any level and in any capacity. The survival of the nation could depend upon their proficiency and their speed. No aspect of it is taken lightly by anyone. Yet we have been fed phony tapes in which officials are heard to say things like “Well, I reckon someone ought to start thinking about scrambling some aircraft and get up there and investigate,” and “somebody’s going to have to make some decisions in the next ten minutes or so,” and “gosh, everybody just left the room.” Anyone with any military experience at operational levels of command knows those tapes are fakes. They are almost hilarious.

Since there was no plane, many things no longer need explaining. No need to ponder why not one of the alleged 19 hijackers appeared on any of the four alleged manifests. No need to question why none of the airport surveillance cameras recorded the presence of any of the 19. There was no hijacker, and there certainly were not 19 of them. No need to wonder why a bunch of able-bodied American airline passengers cowered at the threat of ridiculous “box cutters.”

No need to wonder what happened to 200-plus [imaginary] passengers. No need to question why none of the cell phone companies could produce any verification of the fabricated air-to-earth cell calls between nonexistent people. No need to raise an eyebrow when being told that a nonexistent passenger called his mother and said “Mom, this is Mark Bingham.”

There is no need to wonder why all the “witnesses” who claimed to have seen any of the planes were either employed by the news networks or were married to network employees. “Our producer’s wife is visiting her sister in Manhattan and is on the 28th floor of the such-and-such building, tell us Diane, what did you see?” Dozens of on-the-street interviews were broadcast much later in the day that were absolutely authentic, there was indeed a lot of carnage to report that day. Buildings fell and people died or were injured. Reports of all that were real, but not a single one of those people ever claimed to have seen an airplane hit a building. Many reports of rapid multiple explosions were edited out of the on-site interviews. The witnesses who described airplanes crashing into buildings were all affiliated with the networks. Without exception. It’s a good bet that some of the so-called “call-in” witnesses were calling from within the studio.

One fake caller described his view of the Pentagon from his office window, where he claims to have seen Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. Small technical problem. No office building exists in that area that would afford the view he described. A female caller said she was sure it was an American Airlines 757 because her boyfriend was “an airplane guy.” The three fake callers on that particular network, at that time, were named Don, Dawn, and Shawn. Yeah, right.

I went into the archives and reviewed all the footage that was broadcast that day by CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, FOXNews, and BBC. Everything aired came from only two [master] feeds. Yes, all the individual anchors were different, and each one had arranged its own callers-in, but the footage of the WTC and the Pentagon and the laughable “crash site” in Pennsylvania all came from only two feeds, most likely both in a studio “war room” somewhere.

With no plane, there is no need to explain why, prior to 9-11, there was no American Airlines Flight numbered 11 or 77, or why, prior to 9-11, United 93 had never flown on a Tuesday or why, based on reported tail numbers, records show two of the four imaginary airplanes were still in service with the airlines two years later. No reason to explain any of that. America - - and the world - - had taken the bait. Now all they have to do is keep up the illusion, just as they have done for 46 years with the JFK assassination, just as they have done with the assassinations of RFK, MLK, Malcolm X, and others, just like they have done with Ruby Ridge, Waco, Seattle, Oklahoma City, shoot-down of Flight 800, etc.

What about all those passengers, one might ask? Nonexistent airplanes carry nonexistent passengers, Silly. That’s like the old junior high school scenario where a plane crashes on the border between two states and the question asked is “In which state would you bury the survivors?” Survivors aren’t buried, they live on. You don’t think Americans are that gullible? Look at the crap they PURCHASE, the crap they WEAR, and the crap they EAT. They can be made to believe anything. ANYTHING!

Okay, let’s say that all the 200-plus names on the manifests we were shown WERE fabricated, how would the perpetrators get the airlines to prepare and release bogus manifests? That’s easy, folks, the federal government REGULATES the commercial airlines. They could put any one of them out of business in a week with some innocent-sounding rules changes. That’s the way they control everything - - the media, the schools, etc. - - by REGULATION and by threat of using them to choke out their survival. The government makes the rules by which all of them must live and operate. United and American Airlines released the manifests the government furnished to them. And all the names were fabricated by the government long in advance.

Go look at the archived television broadcast footage from that day. Notice how innocent all the news anchors were, including the biggies - - Dan Rather, Peter Jennings, etc. - - in the beginning, before they were TOLD what to report. They knew nothing of what was actually going on at the outset. Most of them clearly stated that the building collapses looked like controlled demolitions to them. Yet three hours later, they were very careful not to repeat any of that but, instead, kept explaining how the extreme heat from the fires, coupled with the devastating impact of the airplanes, caused the buildings to collapse. They all wanted to keep their jobs, and their networks are all regulated by the Federal Government. They reported what they were TOLD to report. Plain and simple. Here’s when and how the groundwork was laid for the “story.”

Well, Smarty-Pants, that still doesn’t explain Barbara Olson’s death on Flight 77.

I knew that one was coming. The facts prove Barbara Olson was not on Flight 77. Yes, she apparently vanished, but not on Flight 77. It was her name on that manifest, and everyone knowing who she was, that lent credence to the Flight 77 hoax. And it was that single element that created the opportunity to fabricate a cell phone call from her that opened the door for the fake cell calls from all the imaginary aircraft. But once you accept that there was no Flight 77, and it did not hit the Pentagon, then most all the questions about the explosions there just go away. If we aren’t trying to fit a Boeing 757 into a single 16-foot hole, then we can start asking some REAL questions and quit dwelling upon imaginary ones.

The mystery of the light poles goes away. Anyone with any sense knows that if any airplane - - ANY AIRPLANE - - were to strike just one well-anchored steel pole while traveling at a high rate of speed, that airplane would be immediately slammed to the ground and crashed. No airplane known to mankind, of any size, could continue flying at that low altitude and clip off four more poles. It simply is not possible. Even BIRDS cripple airplanes. Steel poles CRASH THEM. So, someone was assigned to knock those poles down and photograph them, or the photographs were doctored (it’s easy with PhotoShop).

Does anyone reading this personally KNOW anyone who perished on one of the four phantom flights? Has anyone here SEEN the light poles lying on the ground? The answer to each is “No.”

Back to Barbara Olson. She had written a New York Times bestseller titled “Hell to Pay,” a thoroughly researched and well-commented book exposing Hillary Clinton for the wicked, evil, vindictive, ruthless witch she truly is. Lots of people wanted Barbara dead - - possibly even her husband - - and somebody killed her. By adding her name to the phony Flight 77 passenger manifest, the worry about a missing persons report and homicide investigation vaporized. Case closed before it could even be opened. Prove it to yourself.

The “official” manifest for Flight 77 was released and published on September 12th. Olson’s name was not on it. A corrected copy was issued on September 13th and her name WAS on it. The explanation, that the public swallowed hook, line and sinker, was that she had been scheduled for another [later] flight and had changed at the last minute (which supposedly explained her name not being on the first one released). But that story won’t fly (pun intended) with people experienced in commercial flying. Everyone knows that flight manifests are finalized before any airplane is permitted to be pulled away from the gate. People make flights at the last minute all the time, but their names are on the manifest before the plane moves an inch.

No, somebody big was involved in her death, and that somebody big was big enough to also be involved in the 9-11 hoax. So, adding her name to the Flight 77 manifest achieved several things. It hid her disappearance, it covered a murder, and it lent credibility to the Flight 77 story.

Moreover, it left U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson without a wife (he may have wanted to be rid of) and with a handful of life insurance proceeds. Too, Barbara had been a federal prosecutor. Investigations were her stock in trade and she was apparently very good at it, judging from her book. Suppose her research in that endeavor had uncovered some other evidence that could bring down some pretty big names, and suppose it became known that she intended to pursue bringing them down. In that event, silencing her became “necessary.“ THEN, eliminating her was a simple matter of timing - - waiting for the already planned 9-11 scenario to unfold - - and putting her on a flight manifest that was to be “sold” to the nation.

Don’t forget, these sorts of people do stuff like this routinely. They killed Vince Foster, planted his body in Fort Marcy Park, controlled the crime scene and had the inept and inexperienced federal park police to handle the sham investigation, ruling it a suicide despite overwhelming evidence of murder. In some circles, crime indeed DOES pay.

Once an observer acknowledges (1) that the 9-11 operations were pulled off by a well-organized group of ruthless figures within the United States Government and (2) that there was no airplane involved, then 75% of the mysteries and unanswered questions dissolve right before our eyes. Many things suddenly make perfectly good common sense.

The only possible argument against the facts presented in my now-five-part analysis, is the lame “But our government would never do such a thing to its own people.” Just stop a moment and realize how truly laughable that argument is.

Kay Corleone: Michael, do you realize how naive you sound? Senators don’t have people killed.”

Michael Corleone: “Who’s being naïve now, Kay?”

How do they keep all these people quiet, you ask? Any military person or government employee with a security clearance - - at any level - - is forbidden by law from divulging or discussing any classified bit of information with anyone other than another person with a suitable clearance who has an immediate “need to know” in order to do his/her job. Divulging such information under any other circumstance carries penalties of up to 30 years in prison. Keeping those people quiet is not a problem at all. Most of the rest can be kept quiet with threats against one’s personal safety, one’s family, one’s financial security, one‘s business, etc. Hard cases are simply erased from the face of the earth, witness Barbara Olson., Vince Foster, Admiral Boorda, and the recent “suicide” of the Freddie Mac CFO.

Are you understanding how arrogant people have to be to drop three monster buildings with controlled demolitions and persuade an ignorant but trusting populace that 19 Muslim suicide fanatics hijacked four aircraft and flew three of them into buildings? People who will do that are simply telling us that they control everything they need to control and there is nothing we can do about it. They will do whatever they want to do and they don’t care whether we know or not. If you could ask one of them why, the answer would be “Because we CAN.”

The most ignorant thing a person can say (or think) is “It can’t happen here.” It happened in Germany, it happened in Russia, it happened in China, and it happened in many parts of the world. In every case, the people did not believe it could happen to them. It’s already happening here. These ruthless, despotic, godless creatures have Obama doing exactly what they want him to do. He’s moving at an accelerated pace and they are coming for our guns, they will vanquish us with vaccinations and poisons, and they will starve us the way Stalin starved 7 million Ukranians. The police state is already here and they have issued their warnings to us. Sadly, only a relative handful of us have heard. They CAN, and they WILL.

Copyright April 2009Fred Marshall Jr.May be reproduced anddistributed in its entiretyonly. All rights reserved.

Carefully pause the video at 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25 seconds and examine what you see. The plane goes into the building, punching through the vertical girders in the outer wall. Imagine what would have happened to the right wing tip in such a collision. Then notice that after the right wing tip has survived punching through all that steel and concrete, and traveling one-third of the way into the building, it punches through the outer steel girders on the near side and is still unscathed. Absolutely impossible.

Do you see a crash site? The people THERE didn't either. 9/11 Flight 93 Rare Footage - Shone once on TV and then not shown again - 2 minutes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc&mode=related&search=