Cisco Firewall :: Configuring QOS On ASA 5520 Release 8.0(2)?

Jun 20, 2011

I present wish to develop a policy and template for QOS on our ASA 5520 release 8.0(2) we presently have wish to do server hosting in our network for other organization,which the they will be able to access their servers they have both public and private addresses. we do have our one servers also already in production all behind the ASA And therefore we wish to apply qos on the servers to be hosted and we wish to do this on the ASA. how to go about this to apply qos on the ASA?

I configure the virtual MAC address for a interface on ASA 5520, will enter the following command on the active unit:

failover mac address Inside 0012.3456.789a 0023.4567.89ab

The active MAC address is of the same as the Inside's burned-in MAC address of the active unit.Similarly, the standby MAC address is of the same as the Inside's burned-in MAC address of the standby unit.Do I get the effect of failover mac address command?

I have successfully been able to allow outbound access from inbound hosts on the appliance; however, I have only one outbound IP address and had to configure outbound access using static PAT. What I need to do is to configure access to certain inbound hosts from outside. What's wrong with my running config? Below are the commands that I believe need to be changed from the configuration. [code]

I am new to Cisco firewalls. We are moving from a different vendor to Cisco ASA 5520s.I have two ASA 5520s running ASA 8.2(5). I am managing them with ASDM 6.4(5).I am trying to setup Active/Standby using the High Availability Wizard. I have interfaces on each device setup with just an IP address and subnet mask. Primary is 10.1.70.1/24 and secondary is 10.1.70.2/24. The interfaces are connected to a switch and these interfaces are the only nodes on this switch. When I run the Wizard on the primary, configure for Active/Standby, enter the peer IP of 10.1.70.2 and I get an error message saying that the peer test failed, followed by an error saying ASDM is temporarily unable to connect to the firewall.

We have an IAS (Internet Authentication Server) to authenticate all our network devices. This server is integrated with our local AD server so that we can use our domain credentials to login into the netwoerk devices. i have successfully configured all our L2 & L3 switches with IAS but facing issue with ASA 5520. Below is the config i have applied on ASA. When i am testing the authentication with IAS server, i am getting "Authentication Successful" message.

I have a SSL certificate from a third party that is showing under the Identity in ADSM, howerver the audit scan of the firewall shows that the SSL Certificate Signed with an unknown certification Authority. I have installed the Intermediate Primary and Secondary Certificate from the third party under the CA Certificate of the ADSM however when I verify the SSL certificate it still shows as self-signed. What other steps do I miss. I have attached some screenshots.

I have some troubles configuring split-tunneling on ASA 5520.Number of remote users establish ipsec connection with ASA 5520 (in central office) using ubuntu vpnc-client.Split-tunneling is in use, to allow remote users to surf Internet using their ISP.The goal is to remove the possibility to ssh/telnet servers inside corporate LAN for remote users. [code]

There is nat enabled on interface, but there is special statement in nat0 ACL for 192.168.100.0 subnetwork access-list INSIDE_LAN_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0.The problem is that remote users can easely ssh and telnet servers in INSIDE_LAN network. Whatever i put in INSIDE_LAN_in ACL, remote users still have full access to this network. Restrictions in REMOTE_split ACL don't work either.

I'm looking for documentation on the Enterprise mesh solution based on 7.0 MR1...In this release e.g 802.11n APs are supported and clean air for the client radio etc...The current Cisco Mesh Access Points, Design and Deployment Guide is based on the previous 7.0 release.Apart from the configuration guide I can't find any additional guides.

I've got a question about the support of AP's in the latest 7.2.x code [URL] We have a couple of AP's that are not referenced in this matrix, does that mean that they are not supported or just that they're forgotten, because we have them running on 7.0.x code.

AIR-LAP1120B (nothing mentioned about those)AIR-LAP1121G (maybe the fall under AIR-LAP1121 ?)AIR-LAP1230A (only AIR-AP1230A is referenced.. typo ? or are the LWAPped once not supported ?)

I am configuring a Cisco ASA 5505 firewall.In the office there is 1 x SBS 2008 server and 5 x PCs, all sat behind a Netgear DGN1000 ADSL router.We want to implement a ASA 5505 for added security.I have configured the internal interface of the Cisco ASA 5505 to be 192.168.0.1 - this is connected to local switch. The client PCs use 192.168.0.1 as their default gateway.I have configured the external ASA 5505 interface to be x.x.x.217. [code]Change the current router status from Router/Firewall/Modem to Modem only (Bridge mode). The ASA 5505 has its outside interface connected into one of the LAN ports of the netgear. The lan port has an IP of 192.168.0.254.

I have a SF300-24P switch running version 1.1.2.0 firmware. I want to get to the latest release (1.2.9.44) - can I upgrade directly to the latest code or do I need to step through all the versions in between?

Im testing ASA 9.0, that according to the release notes should support SharePoint 2010.But I still get the same problems I had with previous versions: the ribbon does not show up (just a loading spinner) and javascript popups do not show as well.

i created the 10 V LAN in my Cisco 3750 switch.All other V LAN DHCP IP's (192.168.2.X - 192.168.10.X) will be release from the DHCP server except VLAN1 . In my 3750 switch i created DHCP pool(192.168.14.X).... and i assigned to VLAN10.... but one of the client is assigned to V LAN 2(192.168.2.X) configuration. but its getting IP from the Cisco DHCP instead of DHCP server.

I've heard mixed things about the use of DHCP release messages. I've heard that some operating systems don't bother with them at all, which makes sense because many users disconnect the network media without shutting down the workstation. Which operating systems actually send out release messages as part of their shutdown sequence?

We have a requirement where we need to enable a dynamic NAT from DMZ-1 to Inside, I gave the command below, but for some reason it does not work.nat (DMZ-2,Inside) source dynamic any interface,NOTE: The access-list is permitting all the traffic from DMZ-1 and Inside (for test)

I've had my WRT110 for about 3 years or so, and it has worked fine for a long time. Today my computers were connecting to the router, but weren't getting internet access so I did the following:

checked lights on router and modem, they all indicated everything was working and normal Reset Modem,Reset Router,Still nothing. Called Comcast, they said everything was working fine from their end.Plugged my laptop into the ethernet connection on router.Plugged laptop directly into modem and it works fine.I saw the link on here to setup the router, and I have 0s on the internet ip, like it suggests at the end. When I click on the "release" and "renew" buttons nothing changes.

I'm having an issue configuring NAT on an ASA running 8.3. 've managed to configure NAT from the Inside interface to the DMZ, using PAT, so that the traffic is hidden behind the IP of the DMZ interface. This seems to work ok.

The problem I have is when I try to configure a rule for traffic that originates in the DMZ back to the Inside. I can't seem to get any traffic to flow from the DMZ to the Inside, and sometimes I manage to stop traffic flowing in both directions!

What would be the best way to configure the return traffic from the DMZ to the Inside.

I'd like to see some REAL LIFE comparisons of ASA firewall throughput (a bit like this one for ISR G2 Routers - [URL].

The reason I ask is that I recently upgraded a firewall from an ASA5505 to an ASA5520 on a small network where the only outside connectivity was a single 10meg Internet circuit with an IPSEC VPN (not landed on the firewall but on a router) to another site.

When I swapped out the firewall the users noticed a big improvement. The firewall is not doing anything out of the ordinary - no IPS or VPN, just standard state full inspection.

We are using the newest release of AD Agent (1.0.0.32.1, built 598). The ASA Firewalls 5520 are having the software release 8.4(3)8 installed.When somebody tries to connect thru the Identity based firewalls from a citrix published desktop environment (PDI) the connection is not possible. Checking the ip-of-user mapping on the firewalls (show user-identity ip-of-user USERNAME) mostly doesn't show the mapping of the USERNAME and the PDI the user is logged in. The user-of-ip mapping of the PDIs IP-address shows mostly other users, which then are used to authenticate the acces thru the firewalls.

What is interesting, that on the AD Agent using "adacfg.exe cache list | find /i "USERNAME"" i can't see the PDIs IP-address neither because it is mapped to another user.Is Citrix Published Desktop environment supported to connect thru Identity based Firewalls? How AD Agent, Domain Controllers and Firewalls are working together? On the firewalls with "show user-identity ad-agent we see, the following:

I try to launch a LAND Attack against my firewall ASA 5520. Everything will work fine. But why, I think it should not work. I use a little tool where I can user a spoofed address, with a cluster shell and attack the firewall interface with the source of 127.0.0.1 ore the ip address of the interface as the source and destination. Then I get a cpu load of 89% with only two host. With IP tables I can use kernel processes to prevent this. But I don´t find anything for ASA.

Two different WAN links get connected to the firewall via two routers.(Different ip subnets).I need to get this two wan streams seperatly to the core switches.Core switches sits.Active/Stanby senario. If the Active core goes down Stndby Core will have take over the traffic. My design is correct ,if not what do i need to change. ASA is 5520.