So if the Axis isn't good in the wind, what other neutral or slightly stable mid are you throwing to get a straight point-and-shoot flight that can also take a little wind? Is the Buzzz a good partner? I know the MD2 is. Any other options?

So if the Axis isn't good in the wind, what other neutral or slightly stable mid are you throwing to get a straight point-and-shoot flight that can also take a little wind? Is the Buzzz a good partner? I know the MD2 is. Any other options?

Actually i use the Z Buzzz for that straight duty and Glo Z Buzzz if needed in the wind or going up to the Gator.

Flat shots need running on the center line of the tee and planting each step on the center line. Anhyzer needs running from rear right to front left with the plant step hitting the ground to the left of the line you're running on. Hyzer is the mirror of that.

JR wrote:Actually i use the Z Buzzz for that straight duty and Glo Z Buzzz if needed in the wind or going up to the Gator.

This.

Buzzz and Gator are both great for straight shots depending on the wind. it can get windy here in iowa especially with a lot of the courses having holes in open areas with nothing to block it.i have been working with the vector instead of the buzzz lately which also does well in the wind if released with hyzer.on really windy days or when whenever i get second thoughts after feeling a gust or two at the teepad i will use the gator. its distance is weak compared to vector/buzz but if its windy enough to set those discs aside, im usually more worried about accuracy than distance.

Axis = suuuper straight money touch shots. It parked a shot from the fairway that I have never parked before (100' shot through a tunnel and over a set of trees that are 10' high, all while going up a hill that is 30' high), hit gaps I have trouble hitting (uphill and downhill), and dropped my score by a few strokes today and I shot a 961 rated round.

I wish I got this disc the day it came out. No time for a long review...and I don't feel like saying what others have already said. This disc literally holds the line you put it on, all the way to the ground - more-so than any other disc I have ever thrown.

@cmrichar: What happened between accepting the Axis and the actual production runs? It's approved with a diameter of 21.8cm, same as the Comet, but they're definitely several millimeters smaller than any of my Z or ESP Comets.

Parks wrote:If the posts on this forum are any indication, the PD is like a Teebird with sunshine coming out of its butthole so hard that it flies faster.

jubuttib wrote:@cmrichar: What happened between accepting the Axis and the actual production runs? It's approved with a diameter of 21.8cm, same as the Comet, but they're definitely several millimeters smaller than any of my Z or ESP Comets.

You've got to kind of wonder what's going on with a lot of recent measurements (ie. Sword's rim width). It will be great when the PDGA has the resources to actually send someone to measure the MOLDs rather than measuring prototype discs. The specs will never be correct with the current system as plastic is too variable, which basically makes the numbers meaningless as protos/first runs are rarely very representative of what the disc ends up being plastic-wise. Hopefully Chuck Kennedy is reading because I'd like to know his thoughts on this subject. What if the PDGA required companies to send a production disc to get remeasured after approval? At least this would be better data than a prototype. Or maybe some of our friends here with calipers could provide some independent measurements that could factor in to the tech specs somehow. I just would like to see better data.

discspeed wrote:You've got to kind of wonder what's going on with a lot of recent measurements (ie. Sword's rim width). It will be great when the PDGA has the resources to actually send someone to measure the MOLDs rather than measuring prototype discs. The specs will never be correct with the current system as plastic is too variable, which basically makes the numbers meaningless as protos/first runs are rarely very representative of what the disc ends up being plastic-wise.

I get your point but still, that difference is HUGE. One thing I did notice though, is that the Vector is 21.7cm, and indeed looks to be a bit (a millimeter or so, like it should be) smaller diameter than the Axis. I compared it to a DX Roc (also 21.7cm), and it's a bit bigger in diameter, but I'd expect a premium plastic Roc to be more or less equal. All of this suggests that it's the Comets that are way too big for the size given in the specs.

Parks wrote:If the posts on this forum are any indication, the PD is like a Teebird with sunshine coming out of its butthole so hard that it flies faster.

jubuttib wrote:All of this suggests that it's the Comets that are way too big for the size given in the specs.

I think this is the true culprit. Older Discraft plastic used to shrink a lot more...I remember throwing older Comets and they definitely felt smaller than the newer ones. Even X Comets are noticeably smaller than Z Comets.

Interesting. I've always thought comet as a 22cm+ disc, and judging by the pictures it is.

Took a measure of a max weight Z-comet, a fraction over 221mm, this year's max weight ESP matches that exactly. My X is 218mm, but that's most likely just because it's pretty beat and bent because of that.

I wouldn't put it past that PDGA has just failed the measuring, since the ESP and Z are the exact same size, and I suspect the X would be as well if not for the tacoing.