C 101/32 EN Official Journal of the European Union 26.4.

2003

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl, B. Weggenmann of 6 February 2003 and C. Røhl Søberg), the intervener before the Court of First Instance being Karlsberg Brauerei KG Weber, established inin Case T-7/01: Norman Pyres v Commission of the Homburg (Germany), represented by R. Lange: Action brought European Communities ( 1) against the decision of the Third Chamber Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade(Member of the temporary staff — Extension of contract — Marks and Designs) of 12 February 2001 (Case R 251/2000- Term) 3), concerning the registration of the sign MYSTERY as a Community trade mark, which was opposed by the national (2003/C 101/56) trade mark Mixery, the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of: R.M. Moura Ramos, President, J. Pir- (Language of the case: English) rung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges, Registrar: D. Christensen, Administrator, has given a judgment on 15 January 2003, in which it:In Case T-7/01, Norman Pyres, former member of thetemporary staff of the Commission of the European Communi- 1. Dismisses the application;ties, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by G. Vander-sanden and L. Levi, lawyers, with an address for service inLuxembourg, v Commission of the European Communities 2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.(Agent: J. Currall): Application for annulment of the Com-mission’s decision to extend the applicant’s temporary staffcontract for a term limited to six months, the Court of First (1 ) OJ C 227 of 11.8.2001.Instance (P. Mengozzi, Single Judge); J. Plingers, Administrator,for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 6 February 2003,in which it:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE( 1) OJ C 95 of 24.3.2001.

of 13 February 2003

in Case T-333/01: Karl L. Meyer v Commission of the

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE European Communities ( 1)

of 15 January 2003 (OCT — Action for damages — Duty of publication and

(Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Earlier

national trade mark Mixery — Application for Community (Language of the case: French)word mark MYSTERY — Proof of use of earlier mark —Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94) In Case T-333/01, Karl L. Meyer, residing at Uturoa (French (2003/C 101/57) Polynesia), represented by J.-D. des Arcis, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, v Commission of the (Language of the case: German) European Communities (Agents: M.-J. Jonczy and B. Mar- tenczuk): Application for compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant because of alleged maladministrationIn Case T-99/01, Mystery drinks GmbH, in judicial liquidation, by the Commission in the application of decisions on theestablished in Eppertshausen (Germany), represented by T. Je- association of the overseas countries and territories, the Courtstaedt, V. von Bomhard and A. Renck, lawyers, v Office for of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of: K. Lenaerts,