but some propositions, for example Chicago is between New York and Los Angeles don't fit naturally in either of those forms. However, NaryRelations can be reduced to binary using various patterns: ArgumentList, CurriedFunction, RecordDescription.

Another list-oriented style is equivalent to an Nary relation:

(:Chicago :NewYork :LosAngeles) a :Between.

Not particilarly self-documenting but some may be
more used to the syntax.

By way of comparing RDF and TopicMaps, associations
in topicmaps (CheckSpecAndCite)
are naturally n-ary, though the 2-ary
case seems to be quite common. (and associations
are sorta molecular, built of atomic 2-ary
arcs? again CheckSpecAndCite).

Another use case - wanting to refer to a group of FOAF:Persons as a set, for the purpose of saying, 'this group of people P was at point S in space at time T in time, then at point S1 in space at time T1 in time'; without too much verbosity; then optionally stating things about the reason for existence of that group.
for context, cf
a discussion of modelling groups of N people, and a fuller description of the use case.