THE FACTS OF LIFE EXPLAINED AND UGLY TRUTHS TOLD
The Scream by Edvard Munch graphically expresses what liberals feel when they hear The Voice of Reason - and that is why I am so hated and feared by the liberal establishment whose ideology is maintained by the propagation of Liberal Lies and the ruthless suppression of the Illiberal Truth. They *scream* and then cover their ears to drown out the truth before fleeing from me ....

Translate

Thursday, 18 May 2017

Female academic awarded £233,574 to research "masculinity norms"

Dr Bonny Hartley

Bonny Hartley:

"I was awarded £233,574 in 2016 for a three-year British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship to explore whether and how masculinity norms contribute to boys’ underachievement at school, and the effectiveness of intervening on these norms to improve boys’ achievement."

A warning to men who are BMVOF*: things will get much worse very quickly if you continue to ignore the problem of feminism

Our
matriarchy does not care about BMVOF. Being a matriarchy, they will
always prioritise the concerns of female voters whose support is crucial
to winning any election.

The more men become BMVOF,
the more feminists will use these men as evidence that men are inferior
to women, and claim more privileges against men, creating even more
BMVOF creating more evidence men are inferior to women, increasing the
female demand for more privileges against men etc etc. Feminists don't
care about male mental health. The more neurotic he is, the more
vulnerable to feminine manipulation he is. Eventually the few men
allowed to live will be drones for the purpose of mating with the queen
and the only female allowed to mate is the queen. Male chicks and bulls
are routinely destroyed, for obvious reasons.

Points to bear in mind about the imperative of defeating feminism:

1. Men who want legitimate male offspring should campaign ruthlessly
to abolish no fault divorce to clear the decks for themselves, or else
be financially ruined by the rules of no fault divorce which will in addition deprive of them of access to their children in practice.

2. Men who want to defeat feminism must not put the cart of sexual access before the horse of re-establishing the patriarchy.

3. Men who want to defeat feminism must not put the cart of marriage before the horse of abolishing no fault divorce.

4.
Men unprepared to defend marriage who do not send the vile baggage of
feminism packing really do not deserve to have offspring.

5.
A nation whose men cannot acknowledge the need to re-establish
patriarchy through uncompromisingly supporting marriage does not deserve
to survive.

6. A nation whose senior male politicians
are too morally degenerate and intellectually dishonest they cannot
acknowledge that marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy
does not deserve to survive.

7. A nation in which no
men of talent or political ambition can acknowledge that marriage is the
indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

8.
A nation in which no men of talent or political ambition can
acknowledge that nationhood cannot exist without the indispensable
ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

9.
A nation in which no men of talent, leadership or political ambition
can be bestir themselves to challenge and defeat the matriarchy because
they are atheists and do not care what happens to their country after
they are dead does not deserve to survive.

24 comments:

CR
said...

There's SO much evidence that girls' school work is marked down when it's got a boy's name on it. Boy's work is marked up when the names aren't included. The whole school system has been set up to meet girl's needs, and it's only since that program came in that boy's performance plummeted. But that's somehow due to boys themselves?

I always thought it was that teachers, male and female alike tend to grade the female students higher than the boys. I literally copied a girls work through my first year of highschool and still got worse grades than her, despite not ever getting caught cheating.

Later found out she had been cheating of some other guy who was getting worse grades than her as well.

She lost me about here ..... £78k per year to do a study and then pulls out the feminist line at the start of paragraph 2. I read the rest, it's a lot of what was already anecdotally known anyway. Great way to spend the taxpayers money.

Single sex education at secondary school is obviously the most sensible way of doing things.

I really think it is important for the sexes to bond with each other before they think of bonding with members of the opposite sex.

It is also confusing and stressful at adolescence to find yourself suddenly having to compete with your classmates to have admirers of the opposite sex. Distracting too.

I suspect the matriarchy will be most reluctant to give a safe space to boys and wants them to continue to be feminised by competing for the sexual favours of their female classmates and having underaged sex. That is how disgustingly corrupt the educational establishment - female dominated, of course - is.

"Although boys and men still enjoy many social and economic advantages relative to girls and women, they lag behind throughout their schooling across many developed countries. My research explores how boys may fall foul of ‘masculinity norms’ which construct boys as potentially competent, but boisterous and troublesome. Since masculinity norms are motivated to protect male dominance, boys who are conscientious about school work and comply with teachers may represent a threat to the appearance of male superiority if their academic success appears to be an outcome of their effort, rather than raw talent. Further, boys who work hard but do not achieve, actively disconfirm stereotypes of inherent male competence. I am currently examining the age at which these masculinity norms surrounding effort and achievement develop, and will then assess their quantitative impact on boys’ achievement and develop new ways to counteract their adverse effects."

Claire, clearly you have your ideas on this subject, I have mine. It is pointless me pointing you to the literature that you have possibly seen and dismissed. In my world it is not only a myth but farcical to assume it ever existed beyond 1960. In my world the gender disparity in workplaces is being addressed by legislation and female ratios, not by having the best person for the job. If you think being a male in 2017 has advantages then you don't live in my world.

The school system has been modified around the western world to actively advantage girls over boys over the last half century or so and the result has been the inevitable decline in boys academic success as girls surge ahead.

This has been shown on many occasions to be a success (for the girls) and hailed as a wonderful thing.

Now the fact that boys are underachieving in a system actively rigged against them is because of 'masculinity norms'?