Hi Edsko
On 13 Feb 2009, at 09:14, Edsko de Vries wrote:
> Hey,
>> Thanks for all the suggestions. I was hoping that there was some
> uniform
> pattern that would extend to n arguments (rather than having to use
> liftM2, litM3, etc. or have different 'application' operators in
> between
> the different arguments); perhaps not. Oh well :)
Will this do?
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Idiom_brackets
You get to write
iI f a1 a2 a3 Ji
for
do x1 <- a1
x2 <- a2
x3 <- a3
f a1 a2 a3
amongst other things...
Cheers
Conor
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.