Introduction chapter

Jon: I moved some language from the Substitution chapter into a new section here because there are multiple places where software needs to take into account and avoid XSS problems, not just Substitution. A couple of wording tweaks, but it's basically the same text.

Jon: I added this section because I realized that people reading the spec might not figure out what those schema snippet sections were about. This new section is similar to previous section explaining our use of JSDoc. Any problems?

Kin: JSDoc write-up walks through the example. Do we need something like that?

Jon: Would be helpful to add a couple of bullet points.

Kin: Explain how we should mentally parse that.

Jon: Yes, that makes sense. I'll do it and send email for people to review.

RESOLUTION: New section on RNC is OK, except Jon needs to add text that walks through example. Send email when completed.

==> A couple of notes where Lori says she will do some editorial cleanups

Jon: I updated the 'format' attribute descriptions for the date, time and timestamp to match the latest proposals worked out in discussion with OpenSocial Foundation so that both specs would match. In particular, the raw datatypes have changed from "Date" to "String". Also, changed references to whatever RFC we were using to ECMA5 because ECMA5 was approved in December.

Kin: My one problem with the link is that it is a PDF. Hard to find the reference.

Jon: I could include a section name within the PDF.

Kin: That would be good.

Jon: There isn't an HTML version of the spec.

Kin: OK

Jon: Other comments on the format table?

Bertand: Just for serialization as JSON?

Jon: Right

Bertrand: OK

<options>

Lori: I have no idea how to rewrite these sections. Just take out the red comments. My brain isn't in that space any more.

Jon: Fine with me.

Kin: Isn't it just about being able to supply multiple values

Lori: The MUSTs were confusing

Jon: I'll take a look at it and see if there is a better way to express the ideas

<require> 'target' examples

Kin: I will have to take a look offline. Would be good for others to look as a sanity check