<quoted text>No, you are clearly bigoted. why all the talk of pansy and that rot?Every serious medical person would disagree with your amatuer assesment of homosexuality.

Show me! It's that simple!

No. What I see is another demographic of aristocrats who don't enslave the sheep because age and poor health will enslave them anyway. In a sense, we all are bigots to our politics, but the medical profession is held to a higher standard, just not one that they let interfere with their politics.

As previously stated, the issue is politics. Politics is about money and power. You find a few of the educated coming out in favor of homosexuality, even though the concept of Evolution is against it. You don't find any doctors coming out against homosexuality because nobody, and I mean NOBODY, is going to pay them to take the political heat. That's all there is to it.

So anyway, show me a doctor with scientific research on the topic, and show us the research. What do you have? You have the EXACTLY same argument that the fundamentalists use. "Prove us wrong!!"

You're wasting our time. You don't have a "gay" gene, therefore the subject is politics, therefore it's about money and a hypocritical liberal elite who are raking in BIG BUCKAZOIDS right now on higher education, law and medicine, while our standards of service are plummeting in the modern world....JUST like the products of our conservative run corporations are.

<quoted text>yeah, those are provable..we can prove that the god of the christian bible doesn't exist. many times over.so what god is it that is out there? why would anyone ever think there is even one out there?

Knocking over tin soldiers again, eh? Just can't resist.

My point to Charles when I bought up the analogy of homosexuality to pedophilia was that literal interpretations of the bible are useless.

....but you had to knock over your tin soldier. It's what you came here to do. You still serve your master.

<quoted text>No, you are clearly bigoted. why all the talk of pansy and that rot?Every serious medical person would disagree with your amatuer assesment of homosexuality.

Oh, and by the way. Let's consider an object lesson on the medical profession. Unless you think that ONLY DOCTORS ARE WORTHY OF JUDGING OTHER DOCTORS!!! Yeah. No elitism there!

Autism is labelled a disease by the medical profession, even though they really don't have a clue as to what causes it. In some cases, drugs, in others it's genetic. It's a symptom of brain damage, not a disease, yet doctors REGULARLY prescribe medicines to treat the symptoms, not cure them.

Here's your new ethical problem, since you ABHOR the linking of pedophilia to homosexuality!!! Why is Autism called a disease and NOT a form of free expression? What right does a doctor have to sedate one's natural (possibly evolved!) instincts to express a type of behavior that we CLEARLY are professionally stereotyping and NOT doing so in a bigoted manner?

Two ethical problems for the price of one! What makes one person a "professional" and another a bigot? What right does any individual have to restrain ANY behavior of another? By golly, THAT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL!! Except then, so is every law.

<quoted text> And i have corrected your errors several times before now.Humans can not use equations, formulae or what so ever to disprove God.Human's knowledge is just limited. Don't venture a battle you can never win.

No you haven’t, you have made proclamation without evidence and straw man arguments.

You don’t appear to be educated enough to know the meaning of evidence

<quoted text>If the universe was already here, then life did not appear out of nothing, did it?As it now stands, the current hypothesis revolves around biochemistry.However this is irrelevant to the validity of evolution. Evolution specifically deals with the diversification of life on Earth. That's it. And all it needs is for life to be here.Life IS here. Life evolves. Facts. It doesn't matter if you think chemical abiogenesis started life off or if you think Goddidit with magic, life is here. In order for evolution not to occur, one has to demonstrate that life is in fact NOT here.I wish 'Professor X' luck...

It is obvious that evolution is a fact -particulars and pathways will always be debated.

And Professor - God and evolution can co-exist - there is no need for psuedo scientific theories.

How is it that you can claim all these stories from different civilizations are "proof of Noah's flood" when the story of Noah claims everyone was destroyed except for Noah and his family on the Ark? Who was around to write those stories if everyone that was not on the Ark died?

Did you even think about that "line of reasoning" before actually presenting it?

<quoted text> And i am again asking you that same question, why did you came into this forum?You can never disprove the Almighty. You can only asserts, but that again does and will never change who the Almighty is.

<quoted text>Show me! It's that simple!No. What I see is another demographic of aristocrats who don't enslave the sheep because age and poor health will enslave them anyway. In a sense, we all are bigots to our politics, but the medical profession is held to a higher standard, just not one that they let interfere with their politics.As previously stated, the issue is politics. Politics is about money and power. You find a few of the educated coming out in favor of homosexuality, even though the concept of Evolution is against it. You don't find any doctors coming out against homosexuality because nobody, and I mean NOBODY, is going to pay them to take the political heat. That's all there is to it.So anyway, show me a doctor with scientific research on the topic, and show us the research. What do you have? You have the EXACTLY same argument that the fundamentalists use. "Prove us wrong!!"You're wasting our time. You don't have a "gay" gene, therefore the subject is politics, therefore it's about money and a hypocritical liberal elite who are raking in BIG BUCKAZOIDS right now on higher education, law and medicine, while our standards of service are plummeting in the modern world....JUST like the products of our conservative run corporations are.D - E - N - I - A - L !!!!!!!!!!

<quoted text>And that's why we're all dead and no-one's here to talk about it.At the very least Noah needed an impulse drive system to survive. Warp drive would have been handy.

What kind of system would he have needed to keep all the species of living things? Could it have been some sort of compartmental system that kept seeds and eggs alive until the birds could carry them about and reseed the earth?

<quoted text>No, there is no issue over time lines. We know how long ago it happened. The opinion of illiterates does not matter when we are discussing science. Ignorance is not a legitimate scientific position.

I have no problem with legitimate science, it is when certain people want ignorance as to what is really out there that bothers me. Let the real truth speak.

<quoted text>I have no problem with legitimate science, it is when certain people want ignorance as to what is really out there that bothers me. Let the real truth speak.

Then why do you continually argue from ignorance?

We know how old the Earth is. There are many sources that show the Earth is old and only misinterpretation of events that show that the Earth is young. Once the error is shown in a claim it is no longer a valid claim. There are no valid claims for a Young Earth.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.