-MIARE: Kindly requesting FBI Field Offices to conduct ASAP Peace and Welfare procedures on FBI & U.S. Attorney Office, Los Angeles - are they still alive and well?-Dear Director Mueller, FBI Dallas, and FBI Field Offices across the U.S.:-Thanks to the Dallas and other field offices for the expedient acknowledgments. Acknowledgements are routinely received from FBI Field Offices across the country, with the conspicuous exception of FBI & U.S. Attorney Office, Los Angeles. MIA (Missing In Action) status suspected. Please accept this notice as a kindly request to conduct on FBI & U.S. Attorney Office, Los Angeles, Peace & Welfare procedures ASAP, and let me know:

Are FBI and U.S. Attorney Office, Los Angeles, still live and well?

Are FBI and U.S. Attorney Office, Los Angeles, still functional?

Any chance that FBI would take action on the matters of Jacqueline Connor, David Yaffe and Widespread Judicial Corruption in Los Angeles?

It was a disgrace for the U.S. justice system in general, and FBI in particular... The sight of a judge, doubling as central organized crime figure, presiding in the First Rampart Trial (2000), then deliberately derailing it by reversing jury verdict...Thousands of innocent citizens - the Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - were left imprisoned for a full decade in the aftermath. It was, and it is, a Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions.

Please take expedient action to free the thousands RAMPART-FIPs.

What we see in Los Angeles today - the false imprisonment of Richard Fine by corrupt Judge David Yaffe, is the direct extension of the Rampart scandal...

Please take expedient action to free RICHARD FINE,

NO LAPD - ONLY FBI AND U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE TO BLAME THIS TIME AROUND...FOR FAILING TO PERFORM THEIR DUTIES!____________

· UC IRVINE LAW SCHOOL FOUNDING DEAN: Best short review of the Rampart scandal (1998-2000) massive probe (2-year, 200 investigators) - How the Rampart-FIPs where falsely convicted and falsely sentenced - Why the justice system in LA County is fit for "the most repressive dictators and police states" - By renowned constitutional scholar -The Rampart Scandal and the criminal justice system of Los Angeles County (2000) - Prof Erwin Chemerinsky - Guild Practitioner 57:121 http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-reports-00-09-01-chemerinsky-57_guild_prac_121_2000.pdf

· LAPD BLUE RIBBON REVIEW PANEL: Best reference on why the Rampart-FIPs are still imprisoned - by an official panel of experts, commissioned by the LAPD itself, led by civil rights activist, Atty Connie Rice - established LA County justice system as corrupt, and called for "External Investigation" - which was never instituted - Rampart reconsidered (2006) - LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-blue-ribbon-review-panel-2006-report.pdf

Dear All:I fully agreed with the messages below. "The Light of Publicity" and "Voting Them Out" could obviously be parts of the same in many instances. As far as "picking ONE really good example of BAD judicial behavior" - my favorite was Alex Kozinski. As noted in the example from Colorado, it simply did not make sense to deal with small fish. You had to start from the top.Alex Kozinski provided an example that was second to none, and as close to perfection in "BAD judicial behavior" as you could get:

The offending conduct was simple, easy to explain to any person.

It did not involve any complicated concepts such as Judicial Activism, Disqualification, Conflicts of Interest, Bias, etc.

It could be summed up in a sound-bite of 10-15 seconds in lay parlance: "Alex Kozinski was Chief Judge of a Court that was second only to the U.S. Supreme Court in authority. Alex Kozinski issued a fake order that looked like a true court order. Alex Kozinski did so to keep in jail a 70 yo guy who was fighting against corrupt judges in Los Angeles. The guy was kept in jail with no papers at all - not even a warrant - by now for 7 months."

It could be even more simply explained in lay parlance, covering only the implied guarantee of honest services as follows: Let's say you owed a guy $10,000, but you knew he was in jail, and could not do anything about it. So you just sent him a check for $10,000 - unsigned.

The visuals are second to none - Twin Towers Jail, etc, we even have videos of various aspects of the case.

It involved the deprivation of Liberty itself.

The true subject matter was cover-up of Judicial Corruption - it kept the whole matter in focus, by bringing you back to the subject itself.

The criminality alleged in the conduct of Alex Kozinski in this case was likely not to be covered by any immunity whatsoever, It was part of extrajudicial conduct that was fraudulently represented as judicial conduct.

The evidence consisted of total of one (1) document and two (2) pages (below).

Almost nothing else was required for evidence (The docket would also be required - a fraud court record in and of itself).

Whatever Richard Fine wrote or did not write in his petition did not even matter here.

The case in full could be argued in one page, or one paragraph.

I do not think that any PR person or media consultant could ask for any better case than this.

Joseph ZernikCC:Richard PosnerRichard Posner, ProfessorUniversity of Chicago Law SchoolLaw Faculty of various schoolsBy email and by fax, as a kindly request that Prof Posner initiate corrective actions pursuant to the Code of Conduct of U.S. Judges.______________Alex KozinskiALEX KOZINSKIChief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th CircuitAlleged criminal conduct from the bench, fraud that was not covered by any immunity whatsoever.Chief Judge Alex Kozinski issued on June 30, 2009 an unsigned, unauthenticated, false and deliberately misleading, purported Order (Dkt #4) in Fine v Sheriff (09-71692) ("Order" -Exh #1). Such alleged fraud in the issuance and misrepresentation of False Court Records was compounded by alleged Mail Fraud. The alleged fraudulent Order was purported to be served through alleged Mail Fraud on Richard Fine in jail, and on Joseph Zernik at his home address.The alleged fraud in the subject matter of the Order involved the purported denial of the Emergency Petition of Richard Fine to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The Emergency Petition originated from a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914), at the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.In such conduct, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, affected the alleged Denial of Access to the Courts, Denial of Fair and Impartial Hearing, violation of Implied Guarantee of Honest Services, continued False Imprisonment, by now - for over 7 months, with no warrant, no judgment, no sentencing, of anti-judicial corruption activist Atty Richard Fine.Chief Judge Alex Kozinski allegedly denied Richard Fine Liberty itself.Chief Judge Alex Kozinski set an example permitting conduct that was common practice in courts throughout the U.S. today - issuing invalid, ineffectual, unauthenticated, and at times also unsigned, orders and judgments that were contrary to the law in their subject matter, but were deemed inconsequential by the issuers, since they such orders unauthenticated, and/or unsigned. It was alleged that such perversion of justice was the most common, serious abuse of Human Rights in the U.S. today. It was routinely practiced on habeas corpus petitioners, who were unlikely to be able to tell whether court papers were or were not authenticated, valid, and effectual.Such conduct must not be tolerated. Chief Judge Alex Kozinski must initiate corrective actions in compliance with the Code of Conduct of U.S. Judges - by immediately resigning from his position as U.S. Judge.______________Richard Fine______________Imaged Records - Exh #1

_______________Text

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUITRICHARD I. FINE,Petitioner,v.SHERIFF OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,Respondent.No. 09-71692D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01914-JFWCentral District of California, Los Angeles

ORDER

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, PAEZ and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.The court is in receipt of petitioners original petition for a writ of habeascorpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. An application for a writ of habeascorpus must be made to the district court. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(a); see also 28U.S.C. 2241(b). Petitioner has an application for a writ of habeas corpus pendingin the United States District Court for the Central District of California, case No.09-1914.To the extent petitioner requests that this court order the district court to acton or grant his petition for writ of habeas corpus, petitioners filing is construed asa petition for writ of mandamus. We note that on June 12, 2009, the district courtissued its findings and recommendations in petitioners case. Accordingly, petitionerhas not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by meansof the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court,557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). The petition is denied.______________167 words were counted from "The court" to "denied"._____________________________At 17:18 28/11/2009, CTBC Director wrote:

The REAL real way to bring justice to judges: Get them OFF THE BENCH!

The means will vary - some instances will require complaints to be brought, others may require the light of publicity.

One remedy available in many states is quite simple: VOTE THEM OUT!

Whether in contested elections or "retention" votes, it is a simple, constitutional remedy that does not require a great deal of institutional change, convoluted legal procedure, or even (in many cases) huge expenditure of effort.

This opportunity is clearly important not just for Colorado, but has the potential to send a very strong message on a truly national scale that judges CAN be held accountable to the law - to the Constitution, and their oath to support the same.

This represents a tremendous opportunity to educate the populace at large as to the importance of holding judges accountable (in particular) and the importance of the judicial branch and need to uphold the rule of law (in general).

Clear The Bench Colorado (http://www.clearthebenchcolorado.org) is the organization I founded to research, analyze, communicate, and popularize the issue and remove FOUR "unjust justices" from office.

I would welcome and appreciate the support of anyone on this list (and beyond) interested in actually having a concrete, measurable impact in effecting judicial accountability and reform. Yes, it's one state - and not a terribly prominent or populated one at that - but the opportunity to remove a majority on a state Supreme Court on the basis of failure to adhere to the standards and adherence to the Constitution we should have a right to expect of judges IS very important.

You've heard the old saying there is strength in number. The obvious way to get the attention of the Judicial Performance Commission is for ALL OF YOU to pick ONE really good example of BAD judicial behavior, then ALL of you make a complaint and get others to make a complaint as well. THEN if the matter is denied to seek judicial review to the Calif Supreme Court. - Brad

HENSCHEL NOTICE OF PRIVACY & CONFIDENTIALITY:

This message is private and confidential. It contains confidential and privileged information which is both privileged & confidential under state and federal law and/or exempt from disclosure under law, including but not limited to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510-2521. NO reader may disclose, distribute or copy this email. If you get this e-mail in error, notify me immediately by electronic-mail reply and delete this original message. No recording, printing or sharing of this email, which has been sent over telephone lines, is allowed, and recording it is illegal. Cal. Penal Code 632.

From:

To:

Cc:

Sent: Sat, November 28, 2009 2:16:37 PM

Subject: RE: How to bring justice to judges

While I really do appreciate your exhaustive analysis of whether judges should be liable and how to enforce liability, if you should, Bob, and I'll keep it for future reference, the issue is not all that complicated. Judges should be held liable for breach of duty causing injury, the same as any of us. If the state wants to immunize judges, then it must stand in the judges liability shoes, just as any employer must do ... the doctrine of respondeat superior.

Judges won't be liable for wrong decisions, only wrong decisions negligently or wantonly arrived at, or in conspiracy cases with the prosecutor, for wrongs done in furtherance of the conspiracy.

But I do appreciate your exhausting statement of possible remedies.

Wolf

From:

To:

CC:

Subject: How to bring justice to judges

Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:51:01 -0500

How to Bring Justice to Judges

Suing Judges

I just read Suing Judges, A Study of Judicial Immunity, by Abimbola Olowofoyeku. Yeah, I broke my mouth trying to say the authors name.

The book gives a few hints but pathetically little hope to people seeking evidence of true judicial integrity throughout America. The author spends most of the pages describing the immunity of the judges and quasi-judicial actors like clerks (Not my fault. I just obeying orders.). But it differentiates between judicial and administrative functions. It alleges that a judge must have immunity for defaming people in court because we give him that authority as one who judges and expresses that judgment. Maybe we shouldnt split hairs. If a judge can sentence a perp to death, why shouldnt the judge simply pull out a gun and kill the perp, or smack him on the nose for good measure? Lots of perps deserve both death and a smack on the nose, right?

We Must Identify ideals

No. We must settle this issue: Can and should a judge get away with abusive behavior that falls outside the scope of a purely judicial act? Should we forgive a judge for calling a defense counsel a slut in court, or for any other torts, except punishment meted out to the defendant? Must or should the law must punish malicious acts committed outside self-defense, regardless of who does them?

We must ask ourselves how justice regarding judges evolves. I believe it evolves with the general ethics of the society. We tend to permit behavior of judges that we generally find acceptable because they are only human. But if we look around at the impact of political correctness, we see people expressing disdain for use of the N word, gender-specific pronouns in gender neutral sentences, and almost anything people might find embarrassing or demeaning. On the other end of the spectrum, we witness all manner of defiantly ignominious expressions, and we tolerate most of them as protected under the First Amendment. Which of those standards should we apply to judges?

Maybe its too late for that question. Attorneys have tolerated and condoned bad judicial behavior as a matter of group policy. The bar refuses to act to discipline judges (such as by canceling bar membership). And now judges even get away with murder.

The Meaning of Immunity

Immunity is a right of the public to have their judges speak and act honestly, no matter how ignominious it might seem to any given observer. Political correctness has no place in court. In a sense, judges are the mommies and daddies of society, and until we flat outlaw all forms spanking, cursing, malnourshing, neglecting, and abusing of children by parents, we will get similar behavior from judges. AS a matter of public right and public policy and practical operation and practice. Those of us who dont like this can move to Louisiana or South Africa where judges enjoy less liberal immunity for malicious acts. Everywhere else in the USA judges may publish defamatory remarks in the context of the case, with absolute immunity.

How to Go After a Judge

In any case, some remedies do exist against judicial excess and abuse (we should never think punishment of the judge constitutes redress, for it doesnt):

2. Lodge with a U.S. military or other officer (18 USC 4) a criminal complaint against the judge and all who obstruct prosecution of the judge for the associated crime consider criminal RICO, Wire or Mail Fraud (including Honest Services Fraud)

3. Public outcry inform the news media of the facts and get all friends and family and associates to do the same, demanding an investigation

4. File an Ethics complaint, if relevant, with the Judicial Qualifications Commission or equivalent

5. File a complaint against the judge with the bar

6. Dig up the judges bond or insurance policy and file a claim against it for damages, sending copies to the news media, House Judiciary Committee, bar, JQC, and Chief Judge

7. File a complaint with the State/Federal House Committee on the Judiciary and demand impeachment.

8. Send a copy of every complaint to the news media, military officer (preferably JAG), JQC, House Judiciary Committee, chief Judge, bar, bars insurer, judges bonding/insurance company, CFOs risk management department, your state and US senators and representatives, area lawmakers, and a huge BCC list of attorneys, law makers, the targets friends and family, mailing list owners, etc. (always show the number of BCC recipients). You could put others on the CC list. That tends to subject them to real spam, but it also encourages them to comm with one another.

9. Attack the judges credentials campaign contribution violations, financial entanglements with enterprises that create a conflict of interest, missing loyalty oath, dummied bar exam, law college not accredited, improper or missing loyalty oath (see CUSA Article IV Section 4, 4 USC 101 & 102, 5 USC 3331, state oath laws), improper or missing voter registration and electors oath, improper or missing bar oath, improper or missing public officers oath of office. Look for forged signatures on the oath document (I saw Jeb Bushs 1998 oath of office he signed in the proper place and in the jurat so he did not lawfully hold his first term of office, and in the second term, his Secretary of State Harris had removed the jurat from the election forms, so he did not lawfully hold office in the second term either).

10. If you dig up irregularities that make the judge an imposter, file a Qui Tam lawsuit, for the judge made fale claims to the CFO for an unwarranted paycheck. State law might give you up to 15% as a reward for recovery of the money.

11. In the event of those irregularities, file a Quo Warranto lawsuit and makethe judge prove the irregularities dont exist. Appeal any ruling in the judges favor.

12. Encourage courtwatchers to attend the judges proceedings and file into the casess and with the JQC, news media, bar, and House Judiciary Committee, affidavits of probable cause showing the judge abused the constitutional rights of litigants, witnesses, or observers (crooked judges seem to favor jury tampering).

13. Hire a private investigator to dig into his family, finances, and personal habits if hes dirty on the bench, hes dirty elsewhere, and you can and should expose him, regardless of the problems he suffers as a consequence. Tough titty. Cant stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Be sure to look into finances very hard. Crooked judges win bets (the kind they didnt really win) at the poker table, golf links, etc. In California, many judges have recently received mortgage loans which mysteriously got fully paid off a few months later. Journalist Janet Phelan (in hiding in Switzerland) has reported on a number of them in the San Bernardino paper. And lets not even get into the incredible retirement benefits judges obtain. However, do look for investments into seriously conflicting enterprises that own or benefit from owning jails, prisons, and related properties or industries, or companies selling products manufactured with prison labor. Look hard for evidence of pornograpy, child abuse, and sexual indiscretions, and get them splattered on page 1 of the newspaper. Take all of the judges family and friends to task for their peccadilloes, misdemeanors, crimes, and indiscretions. Expose their wrongs to public scrutiny and let them know the judge stands at the root of their problems. Then they too will hammer the judge into line. Use every possible lawful pressure to convince the judge to behave, then put his figurative head on a figurative pike for other judges to observe and ponder lest they end up in a similar fix. In this very guerilla war, the wicked shall have no rest.

14. Send the judge notice and demand estoppel letters and assign a value to your work (time, expenses) for administering it. This does tend to perfect evidence of exhausting administrative remedy and building up a obligation to you for your expenditure of time and resources protecting your rights from the judges abuse.

15. Hire a ghost writer and PR firm to send out announcements and releases challenging everything about the judge and making him look bad without actually libeling him. Start numerous anonymous blogs to expose the perp. Hire a marketing company to distribute the links via email (lawfully) to everybody possible. Get Web Position Pro (software) and use it to enhance the ranking of your web site/blog in the search engines. Read the stuff at http://thegaryhalbertletter.com and become an expert at direct marketing so that you can make your messages and web pages effective. Example, create your expose on paper. On the letter, put a call to action (join the protest group, write to the judge and House judiciary committee and local editors of news media, etc), and a web site to get more info. Stick two shiny new pennies to the top. Boldly headline it with Shameless bribe to read this letter. Stuff it in an odd-sized colored envelope. Get it hand-addressed in a womans lovely handwriting, drop a dot of perfume on it. Take a pile of them to Tijuana, and mail them to the USA recipient with a huge obviously Mexican lick-and-stick stamp on it. Beyond all doubt, every recipient will tear into the letter and read it. Many will take action if you do the letter properly.

16. Campaign against the judge at the next election, and get all the attorneys you know to do the same.

17. Support the bad judges opponent at the next election.

18. Run for office to replace the judge with yourself.

19. Last resort file a tort lawsuit against the judge and seek remedy that will not interfere with judges judicial functions. See Slavin v. Curry, 574 F.2d. 1256 (5th Cir., 1978) Ask for equitable relief through a declaratory judgment under 42 USC 1983, 1988 that the judge and fellow conspirators violated your constitutional rights. See Jacobson v. Schaefer, 441 F.2d. 768 (7th Cir., 1971). Also, respecting jail for non-jailable offenses, see US Supreme Courts 5-to-4 Blackmun ruling awarding injunction and attorney fees in Pulliam v. Allen, 80 L. ed. 2d. 565 (1984). Blackmun analyzed the Kings Bench use of the Great Writs (habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus) to control inferior courts. American common law does support collateral relief from judicial abuse, even if you cannot collect a damages award.

20. Ultimate resort file a tort lawsuit against the government for injuries caused by improper control of its rogue judges. The state has vicarious liability (rejected in the 1980 Owen v City of Independence ruling, but see the Federal Tort Claims Act 1988 amendment in 28 USC 2674) because of the judges status as a servant of the state, and therefore of the people from whom all state sovereignty flows. In the alternative, the state has primary liability for wrongful exercise of sovereign powers by its jjudiciary, of which the judge operates as a component, and which is an element of government, the representative of the state (you might want to block-diagram this). Remember that under 28 USC 2680(a) you might file a claim for failure of the judge to perform some non-discretionary function (see Cromelin v. U.S.). You might see a non-discretionary function as administrative, not judicial. 42 USC 1983 subjects EVERY PERSON acting under color of state law to liability for depriving any person in the US of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws. Of course this does not abolish common law immunities (meaning judges can rule so as to protect themselves).

21. Whimzy file a RICO lawsuit against all the bar members of the state, and actually target the 10 or 20 most egregious (jurists and attorneys, state and federal) central to the cause of complaint. After all, they ARE racketeers. The Florida Supremes integrated (absorbed) the state bar association into the Supreme Court in 1949. This violated Article II Section 3 of the State Constitution (separation of powers bar members infest/infect every branch of government, some constitutionally, but most not), and CUSA Article VI clause 3 (guarantee of a republican form of Government). Florida (and I imagine California) operates under a Judicial Oligarchy which prevents the People from knowing all of the relevant common law (by sealing or not publishing salient cases, under the Supremes Rules of Judicial Administration rule 2.420, for such spurious and fallacious reasons as public policy and government interest) . This warrants a lawsuit for judicial correction, if not outright violent rebellion against the judiciarys rulers.

Relying upon the Constitutions

Bottom line, the Constitution must mean what it says. You do have constitutional rights which the state, government, judiciary, and judge MUST respect and protect. In point of fact a real conflict exists between the Bill of Rights (and State equivalents) and the concept of judicial immunity, and rights advocates simply must use every possible tool to hammer the judiciary into compliance with the Constitution, regardless of the cost. Judges wrote the common law, and it constitutes a conflict of interest for them to use that to establish immunity doctrines that protect them from all damage claims for their violations of rights, procedures, rules, laws, and other guarantees of due process, access to the courts, and timely justice.

Common law immunities have no constitutional foundation. In fact, the Declaration of Independence specifically railed against immunities enjoyed by the King and his agents and military in the Colonies. Circumventing those immunities constituted a major reason for the War of Independence from English Rule.

All men have the right to redress of grievance in the courts, to due process of law, and to constitutional protection of privileges and immunities. And the contravening judicial immunity doctrine is fundamentally and unconstitutionally arbitrary and capricious, in spite of Chief Justice Finesilvers opinion in Chrietensen v. Ward, BECAUSE the Constitution does not authorize it as a technique for undermining the rights guaranteed in the Constitution. It falls in the same class as whimsical imprisonments for contempt of court without a trial by jury, also unconstitutional. If an act by any person would violate constitutional rights, then the same act by a judge also unconstitutionally violates those rights.

Nothing Constitutional about Immunity

In Mason v. Melendez, 525 F. Supp. 270 at 275 (USDC Wisconsin, 1981), Judge Doyle opined Immunity from damages, whether absolute or qualified, represents a sharp departure from the principle that persons are responsible for the harm they inflict upon one another, and that the victims may seek compensation from the perpetrators.

Even when some means exists to discipline a rogue judge, that does not provide a real remedy unless some power forces the judge or chain of command to compensate the victims of that rogue behavior, including monetary damages for the infringements of constitutional or common law rights. If the judge does not have to pay, then the State must pay, or justice remains undone, and God will have to exact penalty in the hereafter (or the Mob in this lifetime). Take heed lest God exacts penalty from us for doing NOTHING EFFECTIVE to put the judiciary back in its box.Good for one, Good for all

In principle, the law provides a mechanism for the group (nation of states and people) to punish a perp criminally (jail, fine) who hurts someone, and to compensate (monetary damages) a victim directly from the labor of the perp. If for some reason the group has fallen asleep on that obligatory mechanism and allowed some custom (common law) to emasculate it (such as with judicial immunity), then a smaller group (vigilante, mob) has incumbent responsibility to provide remedy. This happened by, with, and through the Declaration of Independence, all but two of the signatories of which suffered dire consequences for signing it. It can, and perhaps should, happen through the Mafia, community action groups, lynch mobs today, or violent general rebellion. Jucial independence cannot and should not be bought at the price of tolerating judicial abuse in the name of immunity or amnesty for rogue behavior. Otherwise all judges will become rogues, and, taking their cue, all attorneys will become rogues along with them. Birds of a feather DO, after all, flock together.Gratifying Our Quest for Balance

In the final analysis, we must seek balance in th judicial integrity equation.

First and foremost we need to know what each judge does. A civilian courtwatcher group becomes indispensible to this effort. Courtrooms need to provide critique forms to observers, and they should rate the judge, attorney, and bailiff performance, but most credence should go to professional courtwather analyses and reports, and all reports should go into a free, publicly accessible database which people can access at election time.

1. Judges must have immunity from liability for honest mistakes, but EVERY mistake should incur a penalty of enhanced training and correction, at the judges personal expense, so the judge wont make it again. Every error needs to go on the judges public score card.

2. Judges must receive punishment for malicious errors and incompetence (repeating an error, or making a case go to appeal out of malice, fear, sloth, or political expedience), and they must compensate the people they injure from their own pockets, and get thrown off the bench.

3. We must insist upon laws that punish violations of loyalty oaths.

4. All judges must have bonds in the amount of $1,000,000 minimum, and they must pay the bonding fee out of their salaries, not out of public money.

5. A special grand jury (SGJ) drawn from the pool of jurors with bachelor degrees and no bar membership should receive all complaints against judges for malicious abuse or rights violations, and rule as to the guilt or innocence of the judge. They should approve or deny damage awards from the judges bond/insurance policy, and have the power to order a non-reviewable revocation of the bond or elevation of the bonding fee. No government attorney would have the right to attend or advise in this process, but the SGJ could hire consulting attorneys, ex-attorneys, law professors, judges, ex-judges, and other experts for help sorting through issues.

6. We need to undo hundreds of years of this is how weve done it for centuries tradition by eliminating the bulk of common law through codifying it in statute. This of course will eliminate the vast majority of judicial rulings as precedents. The legislature would review all panel court rulings, and add it to the list of rulings in support of the meaning of the statutory law, or enact an amendment or replacement to the respective law and cite the ruling (if any) that led to it. The law could require the legislature not to get more than a year behind on any case. At first this would create a huge expense. But in time it would settle down so some minimum. All statutory law and supporting case law would go in a nationwide government-operated free, on-line database that would also include the statutory and common law of England that provides the basis for American law. This would break the monopoly on law databases maintained by the ALI, Westlaw, and Lexus Nexis and reduce the legal services monopoly enjoyed by lawyers. It would finally make the law easily knowable by the people. And it would break the hegemony enjoyed by the judiciary over Americans. Judges should not have the power to make law at their whim.

7. We must replace all public policy and government interests with statutory law. They amount to nothing more than whim, CYA, and political expediency. They have no rightful place in jurisprudence.Summary Judges Cannot and Will Not Control Judges

Until our world and its people become much more spiritually oriented, self-interest (money, job, fame, ego) will always provide the highest motivation for the decisions judges make. Next to that comes family well-being. Then comes the legal profession (cronyism). Then government obligation. Then, maybe, finally, the litigants rights. If we expect something better from that in the next 500 years, we expect way too much.

I had spoken with Elena on the phone some time ago regarding her "Critique" of the Breyer Report and related materials. My private criticism, which Elena insisted that I render, was that her critique and memoranda contained too much scathing invective to be taken seriously as a scholarly work. As I have conveyed to certain other persons I hold in high regard, it has been my experience that writing a brief (or a manifesto) to the judiciary saying --in effect-- "Y'all are a bunch of corrupt thugs. Now grant me the relief applied for herein" is arrantly ineffective. (Yes, I know the difference between arrant and errant, and I intended the word as written).

In my phone conversation with Elena, I then mentioned a few professors who have published works in this area, who are taken seriously. Elena was annoyed by my comments, pointing out that one or more of the purported judicial misconduct experts (e.g., Prakash & Smith, Martin Redish, Charles Geyh, Stephen Lubet, Arthur Hellman, to name a few) declined to reply to her numerous letters and inquiries and, therefore, she presumptively contended that I/we should discount their scholarship and question their motives. Although I am aware that some of these fellows may have certain interests to protect, I try very hard not to view our world in black and white.

Now, Elena is doubly angry concerning my "fair question" from a few days ago, and has made an issue out of the perceived attack on her scholarship.

If anyone else here has spent more time than I did skimming Elena's "critique" and disagrees with me and found that it had persuasive qualities to send to the U.S. Judicial Conference and House & Senate Judiciary Committees, then please speak up and disabuse me of my foolish notions.

RE: Happy Holidays, and a little gift for you and yoursPlease accept this note as my little Holidays gift to you and yours...
Joseph Zernik__________________

Bethlehem - end of 19th century.__________________Among other endeavors, I was named Editor, by commission, on a volume of early middle-eastern modern fiction, published by the official Press of the Calvinist Church of Switzerland, Labor et Fides:

- - -Nouvelles d'Hebron by Yitzhaq Shami (1888-1949)- - -Edited by Joseph Zernik. with Introduction by Arnold Band- - -Labor et Fides, Geneve, Switzerland, 2006The English version of the work, original edition, became a collector's item, available at scalping prices as used books on Amazon and elsewhere:- - -Hebron StoriesbyYitzhaq Shami (1988-1949),- - -Edited by Moshe Lazar and Joseph Zernik, with Introduction by Arnold Band, 2000.This volume was recognized by the Palestinian Academic Society as one of the important Palestinian literary works of the 20th Century. With that it held a unique place in the Israeli-Palestinian landscape - as a shared cultural treasure.
In 2004 I was invited and visited the Palestinian Authority, in relationship to efforts to produce a high-quality Arabic translation of the volume. Copied below is an English version of the Epilogue for the French Edition.

Hebron - end of 19th century______________________

Yitzhaq Shami (1888-1949)Yitzhaq Shami, born in Hebron and a native Arabic speaker, was an early Modern Hebrew writer and an
early Middle Eastern Enlightenment figure. He studied in Hebron under one of the prominent rabbinical
authorities of his generation, Rabbi Medini a teacher of law, ethics, and Kabala. However, in his teens
Shami was caught by the ideals of the Enlightenment, and by seventeen he left the religious academy and
joined a secular teachers seminary in Jerusalem, committing himself to the revival of the Hebrew language.
In his youth Shami was deeply impacted by the writing of Jirji Zaidan (1861-1914) leader of the Arab
Awakening (Nahdah). Shami advocated Zaidans call for unity of the Moslem world and for unity of
Religion and Enlightenment. But Zaidans most important contribution, according to Shami, was the call
for examination of the historic variations in the relationships between Islam and the State. A century later,
these calls still need to be heeded.

Shamis position regarding organized religion both Jewish and Moslem - was complex and multi-faceted.
His first story, The Barren Wife, published while he was still in his teens, decried the treatment of Jewish
women by Halachic law. Protest of the treatment of women in both Moslem and Jewish traditional
communities was a recurring theme in his works. But Kabalistic and Sufi motives appeared in Shamis
writing and personal correspondence throughout his life.

The pilgrimage from the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron to the Tomb of Moses in the Judean desert near
Jericho provides the backdrop for Vengeance of the Fathers. Abraham and Moses are the two central
prophets of the Jewish religion, and the revelations to Ibrahim Khalil Allah (Gods Beloved) and Musa
Kalim Allah (Gods Interlocutor) are likewise central in the Quran forming the basis for the revelation to
the Prophet Muhammad. These two holy tombs, with Jerusalem-al-Quds in between, also formed the axis
of Moslem devotion in Palestine.

The revelation to Moses is the theme of the Sufi hymn included Vengeance of the Fathers. And the
manifestations revealed to Abraham are associated with the vengeful, jealous Almighty alluded in the
novellas title and ending. Therefore, this novella and Shamis work as a whole artfully preserved voices
and images of Moslem and Jewish way of life and local religious rites in Ottoman Palestine long since
vanished with the advent of Modern times. But Shamis writing showed no nostalgia he was a self proclaimed
anti-Orientalist, coining the Hebrew term for Orientalists in 1912.

Instead, Shamis stories sounded a doomsday prophecy and opposition to zealous veneration of holy tombs
and holy sites, foretold the violence and bloodshed that soon enveloped his homeland, and called for social
justice. In all of these Shami echoed biblical prophets from neighboring towns in Judea, like Amos and
Micah.

Implied in the title of Vengeance of the Fathers was also a macabre variation on the Blessing of the Fathers
one of the oldest and most central blessings in the Jewish prayer book. Rather than a source of blessing,
the Patriarch Abraham through religious zealotry could become a source of perpetual violence and
bloodshed to his descendents and followers Christians, Moslems, and Jews.

Vengeance of the Fathers was signed in Hebron, when Shami and his family lived outside the Jewish
quarter, in a house leased from a local Effendi who, with his family, were also close friends. Shami was
concomitantly teaching in a Jewish school and in a Moslem school, while also serving as Secretary of the
local Jewish community. In the 1920s he was among the founders of an Arab-Jewish friendship
association in Hebron in an attempt to dissipate the growing tension. Shamis position left him outside the
mainstream of either Israeli or Palestinian literature. After leaving Hebron for Tiberias in 1928 he lamented
I feel that the Arabs are missing here, and expressed the impossible position of his writing
Sometimes I think that during this period, full of violence and atrocities between us and our neighbors, it
may not be appropriate to show interest in them [the Arabs].... Indeed, Shamis writing, recently
recognized by the Palestinian Academic Society as an important part of Palestinian literature, belongs to the
long tradition of Arab literature, where in Shamis words the desert winds blow from between the lines.
Joint efforts are under way in recent years to introduce Shamis work to a new generation of young readers
in Palestine and Israel as part of their common cultural landscape. At a time of growing peace prospects, let
Shamis work, emanating from Hevron al-Khalil, become the source of the blessing of Ibrahim
Avraham.

Joseph Zernik
February 2005
On Behalf of the Literary Estate of Yitzhaq Shami

11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http:// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...

What did the experts say?

* דוח סייג לזכויות האדם נכלל בדוח התקופתי של האו"ם לגבי זכויות האדם בישראל (2013), בלוויית ההערה: "חוסר יושרה בכתבים האלקטרוניים של בית המשפט העליון, בתי המשפט המחוזיים, ובתי הדין למוחזקי משמורת בישראל".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in the United States, with the note: "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in Israel, with the note: "lack of integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel."

The United States

* "...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* Los Angeles County is"the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."FBI (2004)

* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)

* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/239647129/The HRA submission was incorporated into the 2015 HRC Professional Staff Report on the United States with the note: :“HRA NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.”

[2] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2013 UPR of the State of Israel was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees' courts in Israel".

2012-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the

[3] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."

2010-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the

2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:

[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/http://www.scribd.com/doc/108663259/