Defining Discrimination in the Personal/Group Discrimination Discrepancy
Fuegen, Kathleen; Biernat, Monica
2004-10-16 00:00:00
Members of low-status groups typically report that their group experiences more discrimination than they do personally, a phenomenon referred to as the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. It is hypothesized that manipulating the meaning of discrimination affects the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. In three studies, 301 female undergraduates (259 Whites; 42 non-Whites) from a large midwestern university read vignettes depicting discriminatory events that varied according to severity and frequency. Participants in high-frequency conditions perceived both more personal and group discrimination than low-frequency participants, and they showed smaller personal/group discrepancies. This effect was found for work-related discrimination and social sexism. Results indicate that severe and infrequent events are what people typically think of as discrimination and that using the term “discrimination” affects personal and group judgments. The importance of defining discrimination when investigating the personal/group discrimination discrepancy is discussed.
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pngSex RolesSpringer Journalshttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/defining-discrimination-in-the-personal-group-discrimination-ttRHNyKkkZ

Abstract

Members of low-status groups typically report that their group experiences more discrimination than they do personally, a phenomenon referred to as the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. It is hypothesized that manipulating the meaning of discrimination affects the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. In three studies, 301 female undergraduates (259 Whites; 42 non-Whites) from a large midwestern university read vignettes depicting discriminatory events that varied according to severity and frequency. Participants in high-frequency conditions perceived both more personal and group discrimination than low-frequency participants, and they showed smaller personal/group discrepancies. This effect was found for work-related discrimination and social sexism. Results indicate that severe and infrequent events are what people typically think of as discrimination and that using the term “discrimination” affects personal and group judgments. The importance of defining discrimination when investigating the personal/group discrimination discrepancy is discussed.

Journal

Sex Roles
– Springer Journals

Published: Oct 16, 2004

Recommended Articles

Loading...

References

Using surveys to assess the prevalence of sexual harassment: Some methodological problems

Arvey, R. D.; Cavanaugh, M. A.

Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma

Crocker, J.; Major, B.

The denial of personal discrimination

Crosby, F.

Cognitive biases in the perception of discrimination: The importance of format

Crosby, F.; Clayton, S.; Alksnis, O.; Hemker, K.

Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives

Crosby, F. J.; Pufall, A.; Snyder, R. C.; O'Connell, M.; Whalen, P.

Ethnicity and perceived discrimination in Toronto: Another look at the personal/group discrimination discrepancy

Dion, K. L.; Kawakami, K.

From rarity to evaluative extremity: Effects of prevalence information on evaluations of positive and negative characteristics