Good
I would include a note however that says this does NOT apply to a situation where there are multiple speakers and the speakers are identified on screen with visual text as they speak.
Gregg
--------------------------------------------------------
Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Director Trace R&D Center
Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering
and Biomedical Engineering
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International
and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project
http://Raisingthefloor.org --- http://GPII.net
On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:30 AM, David MacDonald wrote:
> Sounds like a good sufficient technique suggestion,
>
> How about a general technique which I'll submit... something like this:
>
>
> Gxx: Using a static text alternative to describe a "talking head" video.
>
> Description:
>
> The purpose of this technique is to provide an alternative to synchronized
> media that has no time based important information contained in the video
> portion of the media. Such is the case in a "talking head" video where a
> person is talking in front of an unchanging background, such as a press
> conference, company or Government announcement, etc... In this case there
> are no "important visual details" which require Audio Description. A static
> text alternative giving a general description of the context of the
> environment and any opening/closing credits, and perhaps text at the bottom
> of the video with the name of the speaker, that is not be heard in the
> audio, but seen on the screen.
>
> Audio Descriptions are not necessary when there is one person speaking
> against a static background, because there is no timed based visual
> information in the video that is "important" to the understanding of the
> content. The environment is static and therefore can be described in a non
> multimedia static format such as alternative text that is programmatically
> associated with the video.
>
> Example 1
>
> A video of a CEO speaking to shareholders from his office has a title page
> opening the video giving the date, and when the speaker begins, there is a
> strip of text at the bottom of the video saying "John Doe, President of XYZ
> Cooperation". There is a paragraph below the video which is associated with
> the video file using aria-describedby which says: "July 22, 2011, John Doe,
> President of XYZ cooperation, speaking from his office"
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
> Of Bailey, Bruce
> Sent: June-24-11 9:41 AM
> To: David MacDonald
> Cc: Scott Hollier; WCAG
> Subject: RE: Audio Descriptions for Talking Heads
>
>> So you are requiring Audio Description of a talking head... the
> opening/closing credits, and the name and title of the person speaking?
>
> First, just to be pedantic, I would recommend fastidiously avoiding
> capitalizing the term "audio description" unless you are purposely
> referring to DVDs and broadcast television where the descriptive
> narration is on a secondary audio track. Second, the "you are
> requiring" phrasing of your question also makes me anxious as the Access
> Board does not enforce 508. Now that I have my disclaimers out of the
> way, let me respond substantively!
>
> Typically, a person sends me a URL and asks if I think the video
> conforms to 508. For talking head videos, often the only thing missing
> is narration at the beginning and end.
>
>> Why can't those be put in static text alternatives, given that they
> are not time based (unless the speaker changes)? ... but I think a
> static alternative should be sufficient, no?
>
> Yes, some agencies will choose to remediate existing content by adding
> content to "a static alternative" (as you call it), usually a paragraph
> which is already associated with the video. I think one could make a
> very credible case that this practice conforms to WCAG 2.0. If so, we
> probably need a Sufficient Technique to this effect.
>
>> The problem is not the *amount* of AD required, if even one word is
> required it's almost as hard as if there is a lot of it.
>
> Understood. Most often my advice is in the context of advising
> government 508 coordinators what they should be telling their media
> folks. The media folks have no idea how to add Audio Descriptions (big
> AD) but adding a voice over for the opening title they easily
> understand.
>
>> it is getting into a studio (or buying an expensive software package
> that's the big investment)... even if it's just to announce a title...
> it might be easier in the future
>
> As is often the case, accessibility can be trivial when considered early
> in the process, but difficult and expensive after the fact!
>
>
>