Re: Spelling correction

To: common-lisp@su-ai.arpa

Subject: Re: Spelling correction

From: shebs%utah-orion@utah-cs.arpa (Stanley Shebs)

Date: Wed, 22 Jan 86 21:49:06 MST

I can't get really enthused about spelling correction, even if it's
just a pair of relatively innocuous functions. Common Lisp is already
pretty fat ("pleasingly plump"?), and spelling correction really
falls into a gray area, if one applies the agreed-upon inclusion criteria.
Yellow pages seems appropriate, unless someone wants to argue that
implementors can make it significantly better by doing implementation
dependent hacks?
stan