Discussing the most relevant "sequels" or "reminders" of 9/11. The so-called "War On Terror" is a global scam finalized to manipulate this world's population with crass fear-mongering tactics designed to scare you shitless.

The British Prime Minister Theresa May will chair an emergency Cobra committee meeting in the wake of the Manchester explosion which killed nearly twenty people. She also suspended her campaigning ahead of June’s general election.

In concerts thousands of people film the performer with their mobile phones. They must have instantly turned their phones towards the explosion. Hundreds more will have been outside in a big city and will have started filming when they heard the explosion. Literally thousands of videos of the catastrophe will appear on YouTube.

As usual, the footage is a joke. You see nothing. The people are jogging their way out. You see no evidence of carnage. There would have been more crowd surge if they'd announced free hot dogs in the foyer.

People, I have a question. This new way of showing mobile phone camera footage, with the portrait image in the middle and on either side a fuzzy version of the main image. The 'triptych'. I have tried to search for an explanation of this aspect to no avail, to find people somewhere talking about its ubiquity in these psy-ops. Maybe I missed it here on the forum. Maybe someone here has further information, other than the obvious fact that it's another way of funnelling the sheeple down a stupid narrow tube of (dis)info. Much appreciated. Cheers.

People, I have a question. This new way of showing mobile phone camera footage, with the portrait image in the middle and on either side a fuzzy version of the main image. The 'triptych'. I have tried to search for an explanation of this aspect to no avail, to find people somewhere talking about its ubiquity in these psy-ops. Maybe I missed it here on the forum. Maybe someone here has further information, other than the obvious fact that it's another way of funnelling the sheeple down a stupid narrow tube of (dis)info. Much appreciated. Cheers.

Yes, I spotted that a few psyops back, I ask the same question. Perhaps it's somebody's idea of "less fake looking".

Governments allegedly spend 50% of their time ensuring that they are the "Government" and that the con known as "Government" continues. They have nothing but lies and fear to offer. Terror Central Inc.

Meanwhile, we are told this is supposed to be the symbol of the terror attack:which is inspired by thisand this

...of course nobody is to mention the sexual undertone and Playboy allure of such attire, especially in relation to little girls, nor the fact that they also look like donkey's ears.

But why o why a terror event should even have a "symbol"? Why this revolting death cult pervading everything?

Talking about Ariana Grande and her album "Dangerous woman", of which this was part of the tour:

The album's lead single and title track, "Dangerous Woman", was released on March 11, 2016, along with the pre-order of the album on the iTunes Store. The track earned 118,000 digital downloads in its opening week

This picture allegedly portraits one of the victims, "Georgina Callander", posing with none other than Adriana Grande herself.

Also an eight years old girl "Saffie Rose Roussos" (assonant name again) allegedly diedand these are words from her teacher:

“Saffie was simply a beautiful little girl in every aspect of the word. She was loved by everyone and her warmth and kindness will be remembered fondly. Saffie was quiet and unassuming with a creative flair.

These words sound totally computer-generated and copy pasted, let alone completely impossible in the mouth of a real human being with human empathy.

Funny this. We are told by Google that "Georgina Callander" existed before on the internet, also in the role of celebrity-hugger:

A Midsummer Night's Dream by William ShakespeareCharacter AnalysisBottom is a weaver and one of the Athenian craftsmen who are referred to as "the Mechanicals." (These are the working-class guys slated to perform the play Pyramus and Thisbe for Theseus's wedding entertainment.)

Bottom's TransformationDuring play rehearsal, Bottom's head is transformed (by Puck) into that of an "ass" (donkey), making him the butt of the play's biggest joke. Clueless that he's been transformed, Puck declares that his friends have run away from him in fear because they're trying to "make an ass" out of him (3.1.122). (Yep, that's a case of dramatic irony, all right. We talk more about this in "Symbolism, Imagery, Allegory.") Shakespeare probably got the idea from Apuleius's Golden Ass, a hilarious ancient Roman story about a guy who's turned into a donkey. Bottom's conversion is also key to the play's theme of transformation, a concept Shakespeare borrowed from Ovid's Metamorphoses.