LZeitgeist:Did the school's lawyers have the daughter sign the confidentiality agreement? Since she was being directly affected by the events and outcome, they should have had her sign as well, but they didn't.

Tillmaster:LZeitgeist: Did the school's lawyers have the daughter sign the confidentiality agreement? Since she was being directly affected by the events and outcome, they should have had her sign as well, but they didn't.

LZeitgeist:Did the school's lawyers have the daughter sign the confidentiality agreement? Since she was being directly affected by the events and outcome, they should have had her sign as well, but they didn't.

The daughter learned of the confidential agreement because he told her. He blew it.

LZeitgeist:Did the school's lawyers have the daughter sign the confidentiality agreement? Since she was being directly affected by the events and outcome, they should have had her sign as well, but they didn't.

Tillmaster:LZeitgeist: Did the school's lawyers have the daughter sign the confidentiality agreement? Since she was being directly affected by the events and outcome, they should have had her sign as well, but they didn't.

Suck it, school - pay up!

Nice try, but her father broke the agreement by telling her.

TFA says that the daughter was being directly affected by the events at school since she attended there - how could they legally be forced *not* to tell her?

I still think the school's lawyers farked up by not getting the daughter to sign, but then I'm not presiding over it, so none of this matters anyway.

sheep snorter:"Daddy? Where did you get all this money from for my European vacation?"

Try reading TFA again:

FTFA:Alone, it's unlikely confiding in Dana Snay would have jeopardized the settlement. But having just graduated from Gulliver, she took to social media to crow - the European vacation was just a joke, apparently - and in doing so broadcast to current and former students of the school that Gulliver had just lost its case with its former headmaster.

There was no vacation in the first place, the dipstick literally made the whole vacation thing up just as an excuse to intentionally violate the confidentiality agreement.

the ha ha guy:sheep snorter: "Daddy? Where did you get all this money from for my European vacation?"Try reading TFA again:

FTFA: Alone, it's unlikely confiding in Dana Snay would have jeopardized the settlement. But having just graduated from Gulliver, she took to social media to crow - the European vacation was just a joke, apparently - and in doing so broadcast to current and former students of the school that Gulliver had just lost its case with its former headmaster.

There was no vacation in the first place, the dipstick literally made the whole vacation thing up just as an excuse to intentionally violate the confidentiality agreement.

says on the yahoo page quoting this she wrote:However, Snay's daughter, Dana, now at Boston College and a part-time Starbucks barista, couldn't resist bragging about the case on Facebook. "Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver," she wrote. "Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT."

Perhaps if the school did't want people to know they discriminated based on age, then instead of trying to silence people they should perhaps not discriminate by age.

I'm not cheering for the school, what they did was wrong. What I'm trying to say is that some NDAs are pure BS but they are legal. Come on, If you were in that situation, would you sign, keep your mouth shut and get $80,000 or tell everyone and get $0?

God-is-a-Taco:Oh and for the record, if I had a daughter in that situation I would have told her

I wouldn't personally. Heck, me and my wife keep certain work stuff from each other because its just not right for me or her to know. And neither of us do anything remotely important from a legal standpoint. She does payroll and accounting for a small business. I know most of the people that work there. Its not my business to know what they make... who makes more... etc.

BTW... I bet both parties were allowed to say "we've settled for an undisclosed sum". He should have told his daughter that... told her it would be foolish to tell anyone anything... and here's some money for your vacation.

downstairs:I bet both parties were allowed to say "we've settled for an undisclosed sum". He should have told his daughter that...

According to TFA he told her even less than that.

Context matters, though. If he said "we're happy with the outcome WINK WINK" to her while drinking champagne and gesturing towards a stack of hundred dollar bills, that sounds like a legitimate NDA violation.