Dedicated to the advancement of the State of Indiana by re-affirming our state's constitutional principles that: all people are created equal; no religious test shall be imposed on our public officials and offices of trust; and no special privileges or immunities shall be granted to any class of citizens which are not granted on the same terms to all citizens.
Advance Indiana, LLC. Copyright 2005-16. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

State Representative Jon Elrod

Unofficially, AI has learned that Republicans and Democrats are in agreement that Jon Elrod (R) has ousted long-time State Rep. Ed Mahern (D) in Indianapolis' District 97. While the clerk's office has yet to track down those missing memory cards from about 66 precincts, party workers were able to provide printouts of vote results in those missing races. In the case of the 97th District, the unofficial results put Elrod up about 60 votes, a large enough lead to survive any recount. There is a bit of irony in Elrod's victory. Mahern was the person who master-minded the House Democrats legislative map which gerrymandered the districts to heavily favor Democrats. Apparently, he didn't do a good enough job drawing the boundaries of his own district.

Of the 66 missing precinct vote totals, 27 were from precincts involving close election contests. The missing precincts could affect close township outcomes in Wayne, Warren and Lawrence townships. The missing precincts may account for as much as 12% of Marion County's total vote in yesterday's election. The prosecutor's race turned out to be much closer than many had anticipated with Brizzi edging Kennedy by a 52-48% margin. Some Republicans believe that the missing precincts are holding down the Republican vote. It could also mean that the race for 7th District Congress between Rep. Julia Carson (D) and Eric Dickerson (R) was actually closer than the 54-46% margin reported, though the ultimate outcome probably wouldn't have changed. Unless you know the total number of votes cast in each of those precincts, however, it is difficult to say. Theoretically, there are tens of thousands of votes yet to be counted.

The person who must bear responsiblity for this mix-up is County Clerk Doris Ann Sadler (R). AI has been told that in past elections the clerk's office had a checklist of items poll workers were required to turn in when they delivered their materials to the election center after the polls closed. If those procedures had been followed, it would have been apparent that the memory cards for these 66 precincts were missing. Why did Sadler not require this simple procedure to be followed when poll workers arrived at the election center? I don't agree with Ed Treacy on much, but he's correct to say it represents "malfeasance in office" at a minimum. Sadly, Sadler tells WTHR that this happens every election; it just isn't noticed unless there's a close election. I don't believe this happened during Sarah Taylor's tenure, but a lot changed in that office after Sadler took over from her, and that's generally not been for the good.

31 comments:

Anonymous
said...

AI-

Just an FYI, it appears that many of the "missing" cards are from D-leaning precincts, so, the argument that they are holding now Republican turnout doesn't hold water. Many are in center township. Look for a D-swing, a narrowing (although not a change in result) in the MCPO race, as well as a slight widening in the down-ticket races.

Maybe after the last vote is finally counted, Eric Dickerson will graciously concede. Actually, the Indiana Secretary of State will issue the Certificate of Election to Julia Carson and the U.S. House without regard to ED's opinion on the matter.

Wilson, the Elrod campaign owes you a big thanks. You running off your mouth about how you and the Maherns were plotting to knock off Scott Keller with another Mahern family member in next year's city council race helped some members of the community who like Keller a lot make up their minds in this race. Loose lips sink ships.

All the above aside, you really need to give credit to Jon Elrod. The effort he put forth in getting out in the neighborhoods was pretty remarkable--knocking on doors, sending multiple, personalized, handwritten thank-you notes, getting signs up in yards. He did an excellent job of getting his name out. I definitely tend D, but I was certainly impressed.

As I said: AI specializes in attacking Democratic gay-friendly officeholders. Keller is the only gay-friendly and supportive Republican on the Council or Legislature. Are any other GOP officials ever at Gay Pride? All the elected allies of LGBT people locally are Democrats both in the Legislature and the Council -- these are the people AI gleefullly and wantonly attacks. Like I said: AI and Eric Miller make a great GOP tag team!

Wrong again Wilson. There's a long list of Rs that David Wene has posted at various times which completely contradicts your assertion. I don't have the time or desire to argue with you further about it, except to state the obvious: You are such a hypocrite.

I really like Mahern and I hope he can still pull this one out but he took his district for granted and got lazy. He didn't start campaigning until Elrod had him against the wall.

I was constantly bombarded with Elrod ads, including attack ads on Mahern (and if attack ads didn't work, politicians wouldn't use them) Also, Elrod reached out to the GLBT and went on record as opposing the marriage amendment.

Mahern's record on GLBT rights speaks for itself and thats why I voted for him but he was simply out campaigned this time.

Where is he on gay marriage amendment? Is the anonymous poster correct that he is on record against the gay marriage amendment? Here's hoping as looks like he's my new Rep. How's about he and Brizzi get together (wait, I'm getting distracted. . . .) on that hate crimes law Carl was supposed to help out on, now that Bosma has been dethroned. That might be a good first step for Jon toward reelection in this community. It's never too early!

The Election Board, by a 2-1 Republican party line vote, decided to alter the ballot for the 03 municipals. It was blatantly illegal and improper, designed to give Republicans a distinct advantage. Dems sued and won. If Doris Ann had any legal sense, she'd have known this was a loser in court. But the Election Board insisted. Dems would've settled if the offensive ballot design were altered.

The other lawsuit involved council district lines, and it took a state court to overrule the ridiculous findings of Judge Bradford (which they did, handily, with a scolding for him being volved when his brother was on the ballot, AND involved on the wrong side).

In each case, the 2-1 Republican Election Board could easily have given in, but it took the Dems taking her to court to get the right thing done.

And the machine contract was let after she took office, altho her predecessor wrote the specs and Doris Ann was heavily-involved.

Democrats may have won some offices on Tuesday, we will see how well they can handle the concerns of the people over the next four years in Indiana and Washington. The shoe is on the other foot now. No excuses will be accepted in 2008,2010 elections.

Voters made the right choice with Rokita and Brizzi's re-election, two of my choices.

Voters were smart enough to re-elect a Republican prosecutor and Secretary of State who will keep the Democrats honest and in line.

8:41, The ballot layout was not altered in 2003. Marion County used that layout on all paper ballots for the last 50 years. (Paper ballots were created for every election for use when the lever machines broke down.) It was also the same ballot layout that was used for the 2003 election in the other counties that used optical scanning technology that year. If the layout was so offensive, why did the Democratic memeber of the Election Board vote to change back to that style in the 2004 General Election?

Your beef with the council district lines is with Bradford not Sadler.

The voting machinces were selected by a bipartisian panel created by Sarah Taylor. You cannot blame Doris Anne for selection of the voting machines. Get a copy of the contract. Doris Anne's name doesn't appear anywhere on it. Mayor Peterson signed it. Hmmm maybe he is to blame?

We have a municipal primary in six months. Can we be sure it will be well-run?

No. It'll be like all the other elections.

The process is complicated by procedures for working with spoiled and provisional ballots, combined with people who can't read simple instructions .. "fill in the oval". Even a elementary school student taking ISTEP knows how to fill in ovals. Apparently the excuse for a Congressperson isn't quite up on that concept.

Bob, obviously they aren't certified yet. None of the election results will be certified until next week. That didn't stop candidates from declaring victory based on announced results here, Virginia, Montana, etc.

Each one of the candidates should be commended for being brave enough to sacriface their time and energy to come before the public and be raked over to get a vote.

Some voters need to learn that losing an election for public office is not the end of the world. It is an opportunity to actively participate in the decison-making process of our government.

Each candidate who dares to run is a winner. Candidates meet interesting people, make new friends and have so many rewarding experiences on the campaign trial. There can be only one winner per race.

Ignorance prevails when outside observers like Wilson Allen attempt to brand and label people for trying. Cowards sit on the sideline and criticize the ones who do try. Some of them will win a second time around.

SUPPORT ADVANCE INDIANA

It takes many hours of time to publish content for Advance Indiana. If you enjoy reading the content of this blog, please help out by contributing. You can click on the "Make A Donation" button below to support Advance Indiana by using PayPal. Thanks to all of those readers who have made contributions in the past and continue to support this blog with your contributions. If you would rather support the blog using an alternative source of payment or would like to advertise on this blog, e-mail me at gwelsh@indy.rr.com for more information.

Blogflux

Subscribe To

Comment Policy

Advance Indiana allows you to post comments via this blog subject to the guidelines set forth herein. You understand that any comments you post are your own and are not those of Advance Indiana. You further understand that Advance Indiana is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced in your comments. Unlawful, harassing, defamatory, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, racially offensive, or otherwise objectionable comments are not acceptable. If you think any content posted or otherwise included in Advance Indiana violates the guidelines set forth herein, then please alert Advance Indiana.
Advance Indiana reserves the right to pre-screen, edit, and remove any post as it deems appropriate. You specifically acknowledge that Advance Indiana has no obligation to display any post submitted or otherwise provided via Advance Indiana.