Really need a NEW TRUMP CONNECTION to Jeffrey Epstein STAT, or else press will lose interest. Unfortunately there don't seem to be that many connections. Where is Left Twitter when you need it? @Emptywheel? @kurteichenwald@brianbeutler Anyone?

Again direct your attention to key bogus part of @Lessig essay: "[W]hen Joi was investigating …no one was suggesting that his enormous wealth was the product of blackmail or sex slavery. He was, the world assumed, a brilliant, savant-like investor…" Plenty of people were1/2

V-useful from Edward Jay Epstein on Jeffrey Epstein. JE comes off as full con-man-but piece ultimately doesn't explain how he went "from faking airplane upgrades and bouncing checks to amassing a half-billion-dollar fortune." Evidence of embezzlement/Ponzi https://t.co/9zwfNROcSJ

"The issue of the gifts given to institutions by donors at Jeffrey Epstein’s suggestion, is also one that has emerged in recent days, and we are looking into this as part of our ongoing review."– Harvard President's letter

I agree. Booker has Gary Hart '84 potential. If I were a Dem (wait, I am) I'd very carefully scrutinize his old fundraiser boasts about what he achieved in Newark–crime rate, etc. Some seemed potentially a little … Bidenesque. https://t.co/8KOflRaoRd