冒犯being offensive

比較compare this:「沒理由故意找或買兒童色情品。」兒童慈善事業互聯網聯盟的約翰•卡爾堅持認為湯森先生犯刑事罪，無論意圖。「犯這些罪者，被捕被定罪的多自稱在做反色情運動或研究。英國法院尚未接受此等辯護。」"There is no excuse for buying child porn or looking at it deliberately," said John Carr, of the Children's Charities Internet Coalition, who insisted that whatever his intention, Mr. Townshend had committed a criminal offense. "A significant proportion of people arrested and convicted of these offenses say they are doing it as part of an anti-porn crusade or for research. No English court has yet accepted that defense."(引自from bottom of
http://www.orwelltoday.com/movietommy.shtml)

以及with this:

1996年的兒童色情防治法之中禁止虛擬兒童色情品的規定，於2002由美國最高法院審為違憲，理由是限制言論沒有逼切理由（如政府要保護活生生的兒童）。Provisions against virtual child pornography in the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 were ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2002 on the grounds that the restrictions on speech were not justified by a compelling government interest (such as protecting real children).(引自from bottom of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childpornography#UnitedStates)

背後的after this:

《湯米》的創作人，彼得湯森，懷疑色情互聯網刺激性虐兒童的傳染。求證中，他訪問兒童色情網站，隨後當警察搜查觀眾時給逮捕了。儘管事實上，他行動前經報知當局他在做什麼。 Tommy's creator, Peter Townshend, suspects that internet pornography is fueling an epidemic of sexual abuse of children. In his quest for proof he visited child-porn websites and then subsequently got arrested when the police raided the viewers. This in spite of the fact that he'd alerted the authorities as to what he was doing.(引自from top of
http://www.orwelltoday.com/movietommy.shtml)