Make first settlement offer or not?Posted by CharleyLake on 1/27/13 at 4:03 pm

00

Recently I,the plaintiff, had a meeting with the attorney that represents several people in a non-insurance related civil matter. The defendant wished to settle the matter and wanted me to make an offer to avoid litigation. I have no sense real value of a settlement and there are some non-monetary issues so I asked that the attorney request the defendant make the initial offer. Is there pros and cons of a first offer of a negotiation to settle an out of court issue?

I was told after the meeting that the plaintiff typically makes the first demand. I did not wish to set the standard unreasonably low and I did not make the suggestion of a settlement therefore at the time I thought the defendant should make an initial offer.

Ric, It is and I will follow your guidance unless thier initial offer if they opt to make one is so low it will be considered bad faith. Some of joint owners would seemingly prefer to forego some monetary consideration for being treated unfairly and would welcome litigation. I was asked to participate because I am local. My share is not that great and I simply wish to contribute. Appreciate your comment.

re: Make first settlement offer or not?Posted by Mung on 1/29/13 at 5:18 am to CharleyLake

For a pipeline servitude, seems like full value for the land used, plus loss in value to the remainder would be fair. If you don't want to get an appraiser, just ask full value for the entire tract. Ultimately you have to consider what you could get at trial, and the cost it would take to get there.

re: Make first settlement offer or not?Posted by Mung on 1/29/13 at 9:11 am to CharleyLake

guessing you mean without a ROW agreement? They just built in the wrong place? Or thought they had the correct landowner's permission and didn't?

I see the extortionate value, the cost to force them to move it, but ultimately the land is only worth what it is worth. How did the "bad faith trespass" harm you? If it's outdoor property used for hunting, they created a nice shooting lane for you. Then again, I do insurance defense work, so I'm more conservative than your creative plaintiff lawyer types. Let them get an appraiser and he can give you a value. If you do not like it, hire your own appraiser. The legal profession needs the work.

2 key things IMO to point out: 1. If you get an appraisal,it needs to be sales comps of pipeline ROWs, not price per acre of the land. There is a recent case where this very issue was argued. 2.

quote:The weakness of our situation is that it can be expropriated

This is true. However, there is a statute that states if the landowner's eventual award from judge/jury is more than the highest offer by the expropriator, you can receive all atty fees and costs of bringing it to trial. So its not quite as big of a deal to go to court if you feel confident about your demand compared to their offer.

re: Make first settlement offer or not?Posted by matthew25 on 1/29/13 at 10:51 am to Motorboat

"Seven Strategies for Negotiating Success" by Max Messmer (Journal of Accountancy, 2006) states that you want the other side to give the first number. Principle applies to buying a car, house, job offer, any type of negotiation.

re: Make first settlement offer or not?Posted by CharleyLake on 1/29/13 at 2:31 pm to Mung

Mung, yes I did men no agreement. The defendant has not admitted error as of yet but I suspect faulty title work. We think that it was constructed about five or six years ago and the company has received and retained profits from the chemical that it transports. Other pipelines are in that corridor so we know roddage value. The only possible use for that land is for a billboard because it is Interste 10.

re: Make first settlement offer or not?Posted by Mung on 1/29/13 at 3:34 pm to CharleyLake

Gotcha, when lots of Oil & Gas or pipeline work is going on, sometimes they hire some sketchy abstracters. More than the established guys can handle sometimes.

My dad has some similar property near the Gonzales exit, behind the outlet mall. It is pretty worthless, other than for timber and the Lamar Billboard on it. I scouted it for hunting and gave up after walking in about 50 yds. You might look into an realtor/appraiser, as those guys can come up with super high valuations based upon the commercial value. Who knows, that may be the site of the next Super-Walmarks?

No insult intended, but if you didn't notice it for 5-6 years, it doesn't sound like it greatly damaged you. As the plaintiff, you are suing them for recompense for your loss. It is thus appropriate for you to make an offer, regardless of what some of these super-negotiators may say.

re: Make first settlement offer or not?Posted by CharleyLake on 1/29/13 at 4:49 pm to Mung

Good points. It is a narrow linear tract that arguably could have been used for another pipeline. A Circle K would be a stretch. Damages could be recompensed for ill-gotten gains. I may get enough out of it to afford a duck and goose lease or keep up my TAF fees. Thanks for your comments.