Checkbook Evidence Suggests Paul Ceglia's "Contract" For 84% Of Facebook Is Almost Certainly A Forgeryhttp://www.businessinsider.com/canceled-check-suggests-paul-ceglias-contract-for-84-of-facebook-is-almost-certainly-a-forgery-2010-8/comments
en-usWed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 -0500Tue, 03 Mar 2015 16:10:59 -0500Henry Blodgethttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c73f9197f8b9ade55050300JonesyTue, 24 Aug 2010 12:53:44 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c73f9197f8b9ade55050300
Ceglia is as crooked as they come. Anyone who knows him joins me in having no doubt that this is just another in a long line of scams. I hope Zuckerburg's attorneys take him to the cleaners for his attempt.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c5df9ec7f8b9abb1c500f00newbedaveSat, 07 Aug 2010 20:27:24 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c5df9ec7f8b9abb1c500f00
Yes you did sign a contract zuckerberg In a email zuckerberg called paul ceglia a dum fuck sucker in 2003 i dave posted a copy to the crimsin post and the rumour spread that zuckerberg sign the contract so thank you for that
dave made contact to..THE FBI .there was a FAKE CONNECT 2U account filled with FAKE information dave log a complaint to the FBI in 2004 on mark zucerberg the fbi got sent all the email dave had on mark and about the fake ConnectU's servers
and there was a vid where zuckerberg said that dave gave him the idea facebook there were 2 disc one with a reporter and one to the FBI
lisa simpson got a cout order to get the 2 discs but on returning the disc had defile the sound of the disc to cover up that zucerberg had stolen the idea facebookhttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c58bde07f8b9af405db0000Getting Bored with AmateursTue, 03 Aug 2010 21:09:52 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c58bde07f8b9af405db0000
Federal Reserve regulations require that banks retain microfilm or other copies of transaction documents such as checks, deposits and the like.
It is an easy matter to issue recordkeeper subpoenas to get these documents in hand if they exist, given that the dates and other details about the checks are known. Recordkeeper subpoenas should be issued to both parties' banks for all transactions in the time frame of the claimed dealings between the parties.
Simple process. Should nail the issue completely.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c56d1837f8b9a52740d0400S.F. ChronicleMon, 02 Aug 2010 10:09:07 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c56d1837f8b9a52740d0400
Blodget you need to go to the S.F. Chronicle because they look like idiots when you provide them a story, they don't even read it, and they still have the false headline:
Canceled Check Suggests Paul Ceglia's "Contract" For 84% Of Facebook Is Almost Certainly A Forgery
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2010/08/02/businessinsider-canceled-check-suggests-paul-ceglias-contract-for-84-of-facebook-is-almost-certainly-a-forgery-2010-8.DTL#ixzz0vSQXroPbhttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c56b9507f8b9a1c66ee0d00Henry BlodgetMon, 02 Aug 2010 08:25:52 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c56b9507f8b9a1c66ee0d00
Good point on canceled check. Will fix. But this is the evidence he gave a judge, not the media.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c56aebb7f8b9a4c67370000Joshua AuerbachMon, 02 Aug 2010 07:40:43 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c56aebb7f8b9a4c67370000
Not that it much matters (given that the "check" is for the contract work), but this is an image of check duplicate from the checkbook itself, not a canceled check. A canceled check image would provide evidence that the check was deposited by the recipient; this image simply indicates that a check was written.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c56adc97f8b9a476f540200dbsmithMon, 02 Aug 2010 07:36:41 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/4c56adc97f8b9a476f540200
Jeez, Henry...
What you've pictured isn't a 'cancelled check' at all so, if that's the basis of your legal analysis (or 30% of it), you fail.
As well, I find it annoying that you rush to judgement in favor of Zuckerberg primarily because Ceglia hasn't produced original documents sufficient to satisfy YOU! Excuuuuse me! Why should Ceglia (or anyone else in his position) publish his evidence in the MSM?
Chances are that this is a scam. But nothing you've written proves it and your 'analysis' is really lame and obviously biased.
Maybe you should stick to touting Apple.