Daniel Poole | They are 15 words which will live in infamy. On July 4, 2012, black actor and comedian Chris Rock made the following tweet: “Happy white peoples independence day the slaves weren’t free but I’m sure they enjoyed fireworks.”

Not surprisingly, there has been much outrage across the nation over Rock’s tweet. Conservatives and libertarians are shaking their heads wondering, “How can any person spew such disgusting rhetoric?” But then they remind themselves that the left hates the United States and everything it stands for.

In her coverage of Rock’s tweet, ‘Net Buzz Examiner Marci Stone provided this quote from a black nationalist with a most ironic last name – Elon James White. What White said provides an excellent glimpse into what the left truly thinks of this country and its traditional (ahem) white majority:

But part of being American, to me, is that I have to acknowledge all the bulls*** that comes with it. Basically some folks came over, stole other people’s land, killed them, then started a country on the backs of my people, while killing them, and then at some point they freed the slaves but then oppressed them and killed them some more.

I have a couple questions: Is there any way to compromise with an enemy who thinks we are genocidal monsters that murdered, raped, and enslaved blacks and other non-whites?

Is there any compromise with an enemy that hates white people just because of who we are?

Is there any compromise with an enemy that preaches the mantra of equality but in fact desires supremacy and despotism?

Chris Rock was not joking no matter how much he cowers in a corner. His tweet is symbolic of the mindset of the far majority of non-whites in this country, especially in once-thriving urban cities like Detroit.

For example, Barack Obama has an excellent chance of getting reelected because he is going to crush Mitt Romney among non-white voters, and thanks to the darkening of America, there are now enough non-white citizens for Obama’s election strategy to be a slam-dunk success.

But this isn’t about Obama or Romney. This is about a war between the traditional American majority and the non-whites who hate them and seek to displace them.

Rest assured, when non-whites become the majority, the Fourth of July will be eliminated as an American Holiday. If anything the Fourth of July will be treated like a day of mourning.

Because if Rock’s tweet is indicative of how non-whites think now, then they have every reason to abolish the Fourth of July once they control the “country,” such as it will be.

“Poole, why are you fanning the flames of a race war?” I’m not. It is white conservatives and libertarians who have offered the olive branch of colorblindness for 50 years. Non-whites like Chris Rock, Al Sharpton, and pretty much all the others refuse to reciprocate.

The few non-whites who have reciprocated have explicitly called out non-whites for their despicable anti-white hatred.

Real Americans know that there is no compromising with Muslim terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda. Likewise, they shouldn’t compromise with Marxists like Rock.

Real Americans also shouldn’t have any fear of confronting the left’s anti-white rhetoric head on and without apologies. Some, like Merlin Miller and the American Third Position party, are already doing so.

In regards to Rock’s tweet, the response from real Americans should go something like this:

People of white European stock founded this nation, built it, and maintained it from one generation to the next. This is our homeland! If you don’t like it, then you are free to get the hell out and go back to Africa! We don’t want you poisoning our nation anyway!

“But Poole, you are just feeding into the left’s claim that we are all a bunch of racists!” Oh yeah? So what!

Dan Poole is a 2012 graduate of Oakland University, with a BA in Political Science and a Minor in History. A former intern for the Milford Times with dozens of published articles, Dan has a passion for politics and ideology that he loves to express in writing.

Part I: Re: "The response from real Americans should go something like this:" People of white European stock founded this nation, built it, and maintained it from one generation to the next. This is our homeland! If you don’t like it, then you are free to get the hell out and go back to Africa, [the mideast], or wherever you are from! We don’t want you poisoning our nation anyway!

I agree with the first part of this statement, but disagree where it begins with "If you don't like it", etc. This mindset and comments similar to it have been expressed for decades to no avail. Everyone is free to leave America if they so choose, but what good is it to "real Americans" to continue to make such comments? Over the past 40 years we have gone from having 20 million non-Whites in America to having 100 million now. Not only are they are not getting out and going back to anywhere, they are in fact coming here in ever greater numbers; Telling those that are already here to leave has proven to be an unsuccessful plan of action.

Whose land was this? Who was here first? The dinosaurs? It was Europeans who explored and colonized North American FIRST! Confer: "Ice Age Columbus" and "The Solutrean Hypothesis".

Also, if humanity began in Africa, then there were no inhabitants here until the first explorers who crossed over the Bering land bridge.

The Solutrean hypothesis is an alternative theory about the Settlement of the Americas, according to which peoples from Europe may have been among the earliest settlers of the American continent. The theory that is currently most widely accepted, and which is supported by genetic, linguistic and archaeological evidence, considers the American continent to have been populated from Asia either via the Bering land bridge or by sea. The solutrean theory is based mainly on proposed similarities in stone tool technology of the Solutrean culture from prehistoric Europe to that of the later Clovis tool-making culture found in the Americas. It was first proposed in 1998. Its key proponents include Dennis Stanford, of the Smithsonian Institution, and Bruce Bradley, of the University of Exeter.

According to this hypothesis, people associated with the Solutrean culture migrated from Ice Age Europe to North America, bringing their methods of making stone tools with them and providing the basis for later Clovis technology found throughout North America. The hypothesis rests upon particular similarities in Solutrean and Clovis technology that have no known counterparts in Eastern Asia, Siberia or Beringia, areas from which or through which early Americans are known to have migrated. Some archaeologists have criticized the proposed similarities as too insignificant and just as likely to be due to chance as to shared origins.

Any other explanation for the origin of original inhabitants is not sensible.

Sir. The "Native Americans" were European. Europeans colonized the Americas first. Confer: Ice Age Columbus and The Solutrean Hypothesis. The people associated with the Solutrean culture migrated from Ice Age Europe to North America, bringing their methods of making stone tools with them and providing the basis for later Clovis technology found throughout North America. Asians migrated from the Bering land bridge.

You would have to ask yourself, if the "out of Africa" theory is correct then where exactly did the "Native Americans" you mention come from?

There is no greater historical record of exploration than that exploration undertaken by Europeans. Therefore, I tend to believe the current Solutrean Hypothesis theory that is presently most widely accepted, and which is supported by genetic, linguistic and archaeological evidence.

You are stuck in a constructed history that was made up.

Yes Chris Rock is a comedian. But you don't know if his statement was a 'joke' or if he was actually serious. I did not see it as funny. I saw it as a stereotypical statement.

Part II: In any case, I would say that telling Blacks to go back to Africa while not making the similar comment to Asians, Hispanics, or any other non-White group, is to be inconsistent at the least. Besides, to which area in Africa would the 40 million Americanized-Blacks return? They don't speak the language and are no longer true members of any African ethnogroup. Keeping in mind that 100 years from now the non-White majority of North America may be asking the simiilar question of where in Europe to return the remaining Whites in the Americas, I just don't see where telling people to get out is a viable solution to any race-based concern. Besides, even if every non-White currently in the U.S. loved our nation, that is no guarantee that many in the next generation wouldn't come to hate America based upon biased teachings of history. I believe that the continuing anti-White rhetoric we see in all forms of media and within our institutions of learning, are actually making the case for an eventual ethnic-based division of the North American land mass, and would be interested to see such a discussion brought about within a political forum. Thank you.

I believe that black people who feel such hatred towards my people and the country that we created should purchase a one-way ticket to the African country of their choice. But they won't because they KNOW that they have it good here and that they would not have it good in the countries that their people run.

For example, does anyone really believe that Chris Rock would be well-known and a millionaire if he lived in Nigeria? More than likely he would be lucky if he had sandals to wear because of the type of country that Nigerians create.

Notice how they blame White people today for something that happened 200-300 years ago, yet they never give our people credit for the good that we have done throughout the years. This is because they are anti-white.

BannerBRW: I was thinking the same thing. The second part of that statement: If you don't like it….. It gives the haters legitmacy that Whitey stole someone's land. That part needs clarfication and correction. Let me state the facts WHite people fought their own government at the time (The British Empire) to break free from tyranny in which they really did not want to go to war with their brothers and sisters. But they did becasue of King George III.

And history has proven through many sources that "Indians" did NOT occupy American land first. White people did.

Lastley 600,000 White people killed each other to "set black people free." And as of today in the mordern world slavery is still an issue in non-white countries and is totally ignored by the LEFT and frankly by the so called conservatives for not making it an issue.

Do you really think the Jewish community is excluded as somehow not white in the eyes of people who agree with Mr Rock's tweet? If yes please alter your thinking. My point in bringing up the Jewish community is that in the national conversation on race and ethnicity we dare not tell the Jewish community to "get over" the Holocaust. But in a heartbeat will tell black people to get over centuries of slavery, and the subsequent century of legalized subhuman treatment.

Sir, slavery is universal. I don't hear one peep from the Irish population about their slavery and subhuman treatment. The transatlantic slave trade was a Jewish enterprise and dominated by Jewish merchants. In any event, I'm convinced that Chris Rock's tweet is not about "white Jews." It is about European-American whites. Chris Rock does not see ethnicity. All he sees is "color".

In Britain the BNP has a Plan of Actions and Milestones (POA&M) in writing for what to do with immigrants to attract members and provided they gain enough seats in parliament. For instance, paying the legal immigrants to go home peacefully. If not face deportations by force. However, they want to be diplomatic to start, which is really great. As far as illegal aliens are concerned start rounding them up and shipping them back whence they came. The third part to the POAM is a sensible immigration system that works well for Britain. How many to import each year and from what countries. Basically they would like to import immigrants that are not a drain on society, preferable of Christian faith and White in the majority. However in the beginning they seek I think it was a 10-year moratorium on all immigration. They factored in possibly importing immigrants if it were the type of high tech or medicine type of jobs if they could NOT find a native Britain to do that type of work.

The only part I think they are lacking is to promote through means of government/schooling/industry the traditional family and to have more White babies. With some incentives to do so provided by the government of course.

Well we know that. But the average Joe Six Pack does not however they do realize something is wrong and very unsure how to fix the issue becasue they don't what and who started it. So point it out without apology.

Part 2: I think it would be greatly beneficial for A3P to get the POA&M, read it and tailor it for America. It would be a much needed addition and I do think your membership would grow considerably and let our people know that A3P is planning for a much needed and better FUTURE for White Americans while respecting non-whites in the process but taking no crap and not backing down either from the haters of our race, history and country. A3P would earn much respect with our White folk. That is badly needed.

"People of white European stock founded this nation, built it, and maintained it from one generation to the next. This is our homeland! If you don’t like it, then you are free to get the hell out and go back to Africa! We don’t want you poisoning our nation anyway!"

By one definition of homeland, it's simply not true. By the other, it is irrelevant as this is their homeland as well. Chris Rock has as much a right to be here as I do or yourself.

"It is white conservatives and libertarians who have offered the olive branch of colorblindness for 50 years. "

Plain and simply wrong, as anyone even mildly familiar with modern history should be aware. White conservatives have not taken a single action in the last 50 years that could be considered an olive branch.

"“But Poole, you are just feeding into the left’s claim that we are all a bunch of racists!” Oh yeah? So what!"

2. A state or area set aside to be a state for a people of a particular national, cultural, or racial origin

In regards to the first definition, an argument can be made that no one is native to the land that now makes up the United States because at some point, people migrated there. As the A3P administrator explained 4 days ago:

"It was Europeans who explored and colonized North American FIRST! Confer: 'Ice Age Columbus' and 'The Solutrean Hypothesis.'"

The Europeans were wiped out by the Mongoloid peoples who crossed from Asia. The Mongoloids then inhabited North and South America for thousands of years. Then the Europeans came back starting in the 1500s, and this time they won. Your response might be, 'does might make right?' To which I reply, 'that's besides the point, which is that if whites are not native to America, then neither are the Indians.'

"By the other, it is irrelevant as this is their homeland as well."

Let's again go by the second definition from Merriam Webster. If the USA is an area set aside to be a state for a people of a particular national, cultural, or racial origin, then by definition the USA can't be a homeland for multiple racial origins, which is the issue at hand here. If whites, blacks, and all the other races of the earth have an equal claim to the USA, then the USA isn't a homeland. Instead, it's just a contemporary version of the Tower of Babel. (Even if you're not a Christian, the Tower of Babel is a terrific parable for what happens when you try to mix all of humanity together). So either the USA is a homeland for white Europeans, or its a homeland for some other specific race, or its not anyone's homeland. The USA is not and cannot by definition be a homeland for both whites and blacks, or any other combination of races.

"Chris Rock has as much a right to be here as I do or yourself."

Let me ask you something: Do you and I have the right to determine who can and cannot live in our house? And if we do, then does that right also apply to our entire nation? I know your answer. You would say that individuals and families have the right to determine who can and cannot live in their homes, but the national community of individuals and families do not have the right to determine who can and cannot live in their nation.

I'd like you to explain and justify that contradiction.

"Plain and simply wrong, as anyone even mildly familiar with modern history should be aware"

As the link demonstrates, white conservatives have taken plenty of actions over the last 50 years that could be considered an olive branch. Colorblindness is the biggest one. Just look at how conservatives at CPAC treated Jamie Kelso in this video. Kelso didn't say ANYTHING that could be considered remotely radical:http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/02/jami…

"Yeah, nice olive branch there."

My point went right over your head. What I was arguing was that conservatives should STOP acting colorblind because non-whites aren't reciprocating. What I was arguing was that conservatives should rescind the olive branch and fight fire with fire. What I was arguing was that conservatives must fight the smears of "racism" head on instead of fruitlessly explaining how they are not racist.

The message that Chris Rock tweeted should give serious pause to every well meaning White individual in this country who ever gave support to the Civil Rights Movement and to non-Whites in general. Whites, who thought that doing so could bring about the noble and yet unrealistic and rather naive desire that different races can live in harmony together. Chris Rock, a Black man, who exemplifies a success story in the eyes of many, but who appreciates nothing that White Americans have contributed to this country, Rock, like the vast majority of Blacks in this country, who will judge White Americans ultimately by the color of their skin regardless of how liberal they may consider themselves. Remember this fact when we're the minority in this nation and it's people like Chris Rock who's calling the shots!

For starters, it was the Solutreans of Europe who were the first North Americans not the Amerindians. [Scientists agree that North America was unpopulated until Europeans crossed over the Bering land bridge. See 'Ice Age Columbus'. No other populace other than Asians and Europeans have historically explored the unknown.]

It was the Ashkenazim who started the Atlantic Slave Trade not White Europeans. [Jews dominated the Transatlantic Slave Trade, Aaron Lopez was the most successful slave merchant in the New World. Brazil had the largest population of African slaves.]

It was White Europeans who abolished the slave trade and sought to return the Negro back to his ancestral homeland, but unfortunately never quite finished the job. Maybe one day, the task will be resumed and completed by one or more of the non-Negro invader races also currently colonising North America.

About AFP

The American Freedom Party (AFP) is both a political party and activist organization dedicated to the interests vital to the preservation and continuity of ethnic European communities within the United States of America.