Trump takes it in a completely different direction and frames the western hemisphere largely in terms of pushing back against Chinese and Russian influence.

Competitors have found
operating space in the hemisphere.
China seeks to pull the region into its orbit through
state-led investments and loans. Russia continues
its failed politics of the Cold War by bolstering
its radical Cuban allies as Cuba continues to
repress its citizens. Both China and Russia support
the dictatorship in Venezuela and are seeking
to expand military linkages and arms sales
across the region. The hemisphere’s democratic
states have a shared interest in confronting threats
to their sovereignty.

It argues that "We will catalyze regional efforts to build
security and prosperity through strong diplomatic
engagement." This is boilerplate stuff that directly contradicts what the administration is currently doing, most notably its failure to nominate key appointees plus inaction and lack of public statements on the election crisis in Honduras. The same goes for "U.S. trade in the region is thriving," even while the administration tries to torpedo NAFTA and has prompted Latin American countries to look precisely toward countries like China for economic partnerships. It does not mention Brazil at all.

Perhaps the main consistent message is restrictionist sentiment, but that's to be expected. Maybe that's also why Mexico isn't mentioned at all. The border and trade discussions are made with no reference to our contiguous neighbor. It mentions Venezuela and Cuba several times but no other country is criticized.

What should we take from this? The short answer is more bad policy. There is no vision for U.S. leadership in the region, no acknowledgment of key players, no recognition of important allies, and no realistic strategy to counter Russian and Chinese influence. If anything, the administration is pursuing policies that will almost achieve almost the opposite of what it claims to want.