Please help us continue to provide you with free, quality journalism by turning off your ad blocker on our site.

Thank you for signing in.

If this is your first time registering, please check your inbox for more information about the benefits of your Forbes account and what you can do next!

I agree to receive occasional updates and announcements about Forbes products and services. You may opt out at any time.

I'd like to receive the Forbes Daily Dozen newsletter to get the top 12 headlines every morning.

Forbes takes privacy seriously and is committed to transparency. We will never share your email address with third parties without your permission. By signing in, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Statement.

Artist’s Rendering of Holtec’s HI-STORE CIS Storage Facility for spent nuclear fuel. It will be the... [+] first centralized interim storage in the United States and can hold all of our commercial nuclear waste for as long as we need to find a permanent deep geologic disposal site, or burn it in future reactors.

Reactor fuel usually spends five years in the reactor, after which about 5% of the energy in the fuel is used, but fission products of the reactions have built-up to the point where the fuel must be replaced. After leaving the reactor, the spent fuel usually spends about 5 years in spent fuel pools of water, until heat and radiation have decreased sufficiently to allow the fuel to be passively cooled in a dry cask (see 1,2,3).

Commercial nuclear reactor fuel usually spends five years in the reactor. After leaving the reactor,... [+] the spent fuel usually spends about 5 years in spent fuel pools of water, until heat and radiation have decreased sufficiently to allow the fuel to be passively cooled in a dry cask, shown here.

Energy Northwest

At this point the dry casks can stay where they are for over a century, or be moved to a centralized storage facility like Holtec is proposing. This would make the logistics and costs of storage easier and lower than having dozens of sites around the country, especially at those sites where the reactors themselves are gone.

Conca and Wright (2012) provide background on nuclear waste and interpretation of the three BRC recommendations pertaining to nuclear waste disposal that has led to some of these changes.

Interim storage of spent nuclear fuel is nothing new. It’s been going on in the United States for decades at existing nuclear plant sites. Much of our used fuel, over 70,000 tons, is in interim storage in pools and casks at operating nuclear power plants, and several that have been shut down and decommissioned, throughout the country.

Dry casks are typically constructed of one or more shells of steel, cast iron, and reinforced concrete to provide leak containment and radiation shielding. Casts typically hold 10 tons of spent fuel. At present, dry cask storage is licensed at 35 nuclear plant sites in 24 states. There are 65 sites with operating reactors in the United States.

Now that Holtec’s application has been accepted for review, it will take several years to license and construct such a consolidated interim storage facility.

HI-STORE CIS is a subterranean used nuclear fuel storage system (see figure) with a maximum storage capacity of 10,000 canisters that can each hold about 12 tons of spent fuel. The first phase of the project is an initial 40-year license application for 500 storage cavities which can hold over 8,500 metric tons of uranium. Uranium makes up over 95% of the fuel.

John Heaton, Chair of the Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance, estimates that the entire facility would take ten years to construct, and employ about 300 local workers.

The NRC has projected the cost of the regulatory review of Holtec’s application at approximately $7.5 million. At this writing, HI-STORE CIS is the only ongoing licensing effort in the country that seeks to fulfill DOE’s desire for a consolidated interim storage facility.

Critics of the project cite the danger of transporting what could be volatile nuclear waste, and are worried about the environmental impact of burying spent nuclear fuel in New Mexico. Both are not serious risks since none of the waste is volatile, there are no free liquids to leak, we’ve been disposing of nuclear waste in New Mexico since 1999 (some of it very high activity) and we have transported many thousands of tons of nuclear waste, nuclear weapons and spent nuclear fuel over millions of miles of roadways - with no problems.

Critics always say any ideas about handling nuclear waste are bad but leaving them where they are is not acceptable, then never suggest any scientifically-credible solutions.

Our nuclear waste containers have been tested over the last 30 years by running into concrete bunkers at 80 mph, being dropped onto huge steel spikes, burned in jet fuel fires at thousands of degrees, and sunk deep in water for weeks. These things are as strong as humans can make them.

And Holtec has already done this kind of thing before very successfully. Holtec’s HI-STORM UMAX was certified and licensed by the NRC in 2015 and is already deployed at many nuclear power plants around the United States (see figure). It was engineered to store all of our used nuclear fuel that has been produced.

It will take several years to license and construct such a consolidated interim storage facility.... [+] But Holtec has already built similar facilities, like their HI-STORM UMAX photographed here, which was certified and licensed by the NRC in 2015.

Holtec

The HI-STORM UMAX stores the canister entirely below-ground allowing unobstructed views of the entire facility from any direction. HI-STORE CIS is designed to unify the storage of all different storage canisters (both vertically and horizontally stored) in one standardized HI-STORM UMAX system simplifying operations and moving beyond our older management activities.

These systems are indeed a temporary interim measure. The stainless-steel canisters are easily retrievable and ready for transport to whatever permanent solution is chosen, such as deep geologic disposal or burning in fast reactors. The canisters are designed, qualified, and tested to survive for centuries and prevent the release of radioactive material under the most adverse accident scenarios postulated by NRC regulations for both storage and transportation.

As an add-on, Holtec is also seeking approval from NRC to use the heat generated by the waste, from just sitting on the pad, to make clean drinking water from dirty water from industrial processes like drilling. New Mexico generates a lot of water contaminated with organics and salts, especially in the region where the interim storage facility will be located, and using their patented process-heat design would be quite a boon to this arid region.

Using waste heat for industrial processes, even just heating homes and buildings, is just what Sweden and other Scandinavian countries do with much of their waste heat, from all generation sources, not just nuclear. It’s about time we employed this type of energy efficiency in all process or waste heat, from industry and energy.. Venting so much heat to the atmosphere is wasteful and counter-productive if one cares about global warming.

Holtec International is a diverse energy company headquartered in Jupiter, Florida that hopes to use this system for its own future nuclear waste. Holtec is developing and testing a small modular reactor, the SMR-160 in its new Singh Technology Campus on the Delaware River in Camden, New Jersey. Like almost all SMRs, it will be walk-away safe, unable to melt-down.

Dealing with the waste is really the last hurdle in a bright and clean nuclear future.

I have been a scientist in the field of the earth and environmental sciences for 33 years, specializing in geologic disposal of nuclear waste, energy-related research,

…

I have been a scientist in the field of the earth and environmental sciences for 33 years, specializing in geologic disposal of nuclear waste, energy-related research, planetary surface processes, radiobiology and shielding for space colonies, subsurface transport and environmental clean-up of heavy metals. I am a Trustee of the Herbert M. Parker Foundation, Adjunct at WSU, an Affiliate Scientist at LANL and consult on strategic planning for the DOE, EPA/State environmental agencies, and industry including companies that own nuclear, hydro, wind farms, large solar arrays, coal and gas plants. I also consult for EPA/State environmental agencies and industry on clean-up of heavy metals from soil and water. For over 25 years I have been a member of Sierra Club, Greenpeace, the NRDC, the Environmental Defense Fund and many others, as well as professional societies including the America Nuclear Society, the American Chemical Society, the Geological Society of America and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.