HILLARY AND BILL CLINTON'S SPEAKING FEES SINCE 2001

Hillary and Bill Clinton have taken in $154 million in speaking fees, averaging over $220,000 per speech from 2001 until Hillary started her campaign for president in 2015. They've made at least $1.8 million from banks alone. Hillary also demands over $200,000 from universities for a 90-minute speech. It's been reported elsewhere that Hillary also demands triple figures for ancillary expenses, including security and aides.

It is clear what banks receive for these huge fees, access and favored policy input, but what does a university gain? And, the Democrat Party, of which she is a part, decries the high cost of education. Intellectual dishonesty prevails in all she does. He as well!

Oh, by the way, this is only a part of their "take" since leaving office. There's the Clinton Foundations and Canadian operation that brings in huge money.

Oh yes. There was once an ex-president who pledged never to capitalize, in any way, on his service to the country. He followed through with integrity!! Harry Truman.

Get link

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Google+

Email

Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In
a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who
manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of
people who are put into management and supervisory positions for
which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have
progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this
is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In
all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time
have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation
applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is
put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also
valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often
played out. The
election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the
most significant example of this in my lifetime. I w…

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more. The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry …