In Mill's Utilitarianism, he moves away from the traditional Benthamite argument which measures all types of pleasure in the same way, to stating that some pleasures are of higher value and therefore should be preferred over the so-called 'lower' pleasures when making ethical decisions. The main criticism to this idea is the question of whether can still remain a true hedonist and utilitarian, and if his ideas actually hold any weight.

One of the obvious strengths of Mill's argument is that it addresses Bentham's problem in being able to compare certain experiences. If all pleasures are of equal quality it could be hard to decide the right course of action if they had a similar effect on similar amounts of people. Mill answers this incomparability problem by arguing that some pleasures, i.e. intellect over animal pleasures, or mental over bodily pleasures, are higher in value, and should be preferred in moral choices, as the amount of enjoyment from those who experience these pleasures will far outweigh any number of people enjoying the lower pleasures.

Mill Street, Warwick

From http://hypernews.ngdc.noaa.gov

Jeremy Bentham, by Henry William Pickersgill (died...

However, from this a new problem arises of how to decide and distinguish between types of pleasure.

Mill states that to know what the different kinds of pleasure are you need to have experienced both (known as the informed preference test). However, how can someone who has experienced both know whether it is more pleasurable to just have experienced the pleasures of the senses, and vice versa? This brings great difficulty in the principle of higher/lower pleasures and also in choosing the right course of action. Not only this, but there is no clear standard to which something could be considered either a higher or a lower pleasure. Mill is vague in the use of these terms, and they here are not mutually exclusive. One...

Citation styles:

Are you convinced by Mill's attempt to draw a qualitative distinction between pleasures?. (2006, January 25). In WriteWork.com. Retrieved 02:27, March 20, 2018, from http://www.writework.com/essay/you-convinced-mill-s-attempt-draw-qualitative-distinction

More Modern Philosophy essays:

... have a word for such a dichotomy. The point is that 'natural' distinctions are still artificially applied by the human intellect upon the world which has no such distinctions inherently, but those distinctions seem natural because they helped humans survive and ...

Genocide After Rodney King was beaten, and the white police officers were aquitted, he said 'Why can't we all just get along?' A question asked by many people. Rascist and Genocidal acts such as this have been going on for many years, and should not be tolerated. In international law, the crime of ...

... such as, the individuals need for "excitement" and "wonder" arising from miracles. Even the individual who can not enjoy the pleasure immediately will still believe in a miracle, regardless of the possible validity of the miracle. With this, it leads the ...

... an extremely arrogant and proud view, but it is the only one I can think of. I believe that the strength of dualism's positive arguments outweighs is detractions. Works Cited Churchland, Paul M. Matter and Consciousness. Massachusetts: The MIT Press ...

... , all positions of power or authority, and power that representative bodies such as the parliament have are held at the pleasure of, and are revocable by, the monarch. In a similar vein there is no justification for complaining to the monarchy ...

8 pages3105Mar/20024.3

Students & Profs. say about us:

"Good news: you can turn to other's writing help. WriteWork has over 100,000 sample papers"