Primary Navigation

Re: [hackers-il] Offfftopic answer

Websphere, JBoss, etc. are J2EE containers -- that is they aspire to be a standards-complying (yeah right) implementations of the J2EE specifications designed

Message 1 of 18
, Nov 1, 2004

0 Attachment

Websphere, JBoss, etc. are J2EE containers -- that is they aspire to
be a standards-complying (yeah right) implementations of the J2EE
specifications designed to deploy and run Enterprise Java Beans and
web-applications (Servlets/JSP based).

So they are both application servers, middleware and a whatchamacallit :)

-Tal

On 01 Nov 2004 23:54:59 +0000, Oleg Goldshmidt <pub@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> omer mussaev <eomer_mussaev@...> writes:
>
> > J2EE takes the notion of OS further. No J2EE app lives by itself,
> > but rather is deployed in some kind of "application
> > server/container". The "server" provides all novel features, such as
> > load balancing, "hot-deploying", logging, transactions, centralized
> > configuration, falut-tolerance, ease of use and web framework. The
> > app itself uses all that features as a black box and contains
> > business logic only.
>
> Pardon my ignorance, but as long as we are having this (more on-topic
> than most) discussion, is all of the above a part of J2EE (i.e. Java
> the language) or a part of an "application server" or "middleware" or
> whatchamacallit, such as Websphere or Weblogic or Tomcat etc? I
> realize that the watchamacallit may be intended to run J2EE and may be
> written (completely or in part) in Java, but I would still like to
> understand what the case is.
>
> --
> Oleg Goldshmidt | pub@...
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>