Newly obtained documents show Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney was informed more than once and long in advance that the RCMP was likely going to reclassify and ban a controversial semi-automatic rifle.

Even so, when the move was officially made to prohibit the Swiss Arms Classic Green and other PE90 model rifles, Blaney expressed outrage and said he was "troubled to learn" of the decision made by "unelected bureaucrats."

Documents obtained by CBC News under the Access to Information Act show the Mounties informed Blaney at least twice in writing about their investigation into a complaint the semi-automatic weapon could easily be converted into a fully automatic weapon.

Weapons similar to these guns were put on a prohibited list by the RCMP, but the government stepped in and granted amnesty to owners of Swiss Arms Classic Greens. (www.m4carbine.net)

"The actions of these bureaucrats are absolutely unacceptable," Blaney said in the statement, adding that the RCMP "has no idea how many of these rifles exist and they have not announced any plan on how to deal with those who purchased these firearms lawfully."

But the public safety ministry's records suggest otherwise.

Year-long review

Earlier this year, the RCMP wrapped up a year-long investigation into the Swiss Arms Classic Green after receiving a complaint the semi-automatic gun could be easily converted into a fully automatic weapon.

The RCMP issued its first written briefing to the government on the review on June 7, 2013. The briefing note prepared for Toews and signed by RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson explained the origins of the Mounties' reclassification exercise.

The memo also explored strategic considerations such as the fact that "302 restricted and prohibited PE90 firearm variants are currently registered to individuals and businesses."

In July 2013, the RCMP submitted a summary of the issue, its background and current status to Blaney in a briefing provided to him as the new public safety minister.

The Mounties submitted another briefing note for Blaney on Feb. 20, 2014, also signed by Paulson, that explained the Mounties' findings and decision.

The document discussed how automatic weapons are considered more lethal than other firearms because they can be reloaded faster and shoot a spray of bullets with one pull of the trigger.

The briefing note went on to say that while the the overall number of the now-prohibited weapons is unknown — due to the decision to scrap the long-gun registry — the Canada Border Services Agency might be able to provide an estimate of how many of those guns have been imported into Canada since 2001.

'Available to discuss'

"The RCMP is available to discuss how to best address the issue of the Classic Green rifle and its variants and develop options for the minister's consideration," Paulson told the minister, since measures would have to be taken to address that hundreds of Canadians may no longer be in compliance with the Firearms Act.

A spokesman for Blaney said the minister's office didn't get any options from the RCMP.

“The minister was not informed in advance that any decision had been reached regarding the reclassification of firearms," Jean-Christophe de la Rue said in an email to CBC News.

"Unfortunately, unelected bureaucrats proceeded with this reversal of their previous assessment of these firearms without consultation. As stated previously, we are working on a solution that will ensure that law-abiding firearms’ owners who acted in good faith will not be penalized as a result of this situation.”

Corrections

This story has been updated from an earlier version to correct that the amnesty is for two years.

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Note: The CBC does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that comments are moderated and published according to our submission guidelines.