Counter

Thursday, April 7, 2016

What happens when you help

CrimsonRose gave us links to newspaper articles. This led to a re-write of part of the chapter entitled "Out of Babylon."

Called by His Name

Two issues attached to the
earliest congregations and small fellowships: Their self- identity, and how
outsiders identified them. Russell and many of his earliest associates came
from traditions that rejected any name but Christian or some version of a
Bible-based name.[1] They saw sectarianism as
of the Devil. That left them nameless. Augustus Bergner told The New York
Sun that he belonged “to a company of Christians who have no common name.
We are not Second Adventists, and we are not the ‘Holiness’ or ‘Higher Life’
sect.”[2]

Maria Russell said that most if not all early
fellowships met in homes. She spoke of the true church as “scattered all over
the world, many of them standing alone, and some in little companies, often
numbering only two or three, and meeting from house to house.”[3]When Frank Draper, an early-days evangelist
spoke at Glens Falls, New York, it was in the home of W. H. Gildersleeve, who
was willing to invite the public into his home.[4]
Somewhat later the Glens Falls meetings moved to the home of Mrs. C. W. Long,
but within two years they returned to the Gildersleve home on Birch Avenue.[5] H.
Samson, for a while a Watch Tower evangelist, seldom spoke in a public
facility. A newspaper noted that “most of his meetings … have been held in the
parlor of some member of the church.”[6]
There are many other examples of home-churches, but most of that history is
more suitable for the third book in this series.

Individual congregations
experimented with names. Most of the congregational names that have come down
to us are from outside the period we cover in these two volumes, but we should
note some examples. The congregation in St. Louis, Missouri, styled itself
“Seekers After Truth.”[7] The
newly-formed congregation at Salem, Oregon, called itself “The Church of the
Living God,” a Biblical phrase. They met in the Women’s Christian Temperance
Hall.[8]
Believers in Akron, Ohio, organized regular meetings in late 1902. A
representative told a reporter that they “may be called Dawn Students, or
members of the Church of the Living God.” Their meetings were held in the homes
of members.[9] The Watch Tower
congregation in Grants Pass, Oregon, also used the name.[10]
The Cedar Rapids congregation used it too, as did the congregation in Saratoga,
New York. W. Hope Hay, a Watch Tower representative, used it as well.[11]
In Cortland, New York, they called themselves the “Church of the Living God and
Church of the Little Flock.” Occasionally, gatherings were described as “a
meeting of the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society.”[12] Though
Church of the Living God was appealing because it is derived from scripture, it
was also used by a politically radical Black church, and Watch Tower
congregations distanced themselves from the name.

[illustration]

Advertisement:
Scranton Tribune¸ July 26, 1902.

Church of the Little Flock
designated the congregation in Cortland, New York. When R. E. Streeter spoke
there in December 1902, it was on the well used topics of “The Coming Kingdom,”
and “Restitution of all Things.” An advertisement for his sermons used the
Little Flock designator. He spoke in the Women’s Christian Temperance Union
hall, and the congregation was still meeting there in 1904 and still using the
name. Work of the North Carolina evangelists, many of whom were former clergy,
bore fruit, and a small congregation formed in Nicolas County near Elizabeth
City. The local paper reported: A new religious sect has been started in the
wilds of Nicholas county. [sic] The New sect is called the “New Lights.” The
sect is said to have arisen from the influence of Rev. Russell, of Allegheny
City, where he conducts a newspaper called Zion’s Watch Tower. The
members of the New Light sect profess to believe there is no hell.”[13]
The New Light name was reused in West Virginia.

illustration here

As noted, when the Scranton,
Pennsylvania, congregation was formed they used the name The Watch Tower Bible
Class.[14]
When Russell spoke there, the press release used adjective laden phrasing: “Readers
and students of the ‘Millennial Dawn’ series and all others who are interest in
the subject of the pre-millennial advent.” When the Richmond, Indiana,
congregation was organized by J. G. Wright, a Watch Tower “pilgrim,” it was
called The Millennial Dawn Society.[15] A
meeting-time announcement for the Richmond, Virginia, congregation called them
Believers in the Dawning Millennium. They met Sundays in Marshal Hall on East
Broad Street.[16] The announcement did not
capitalize as we have, and the name seems more of a description of belief than
a title. Using some form of “Millennial Dawn” in advertisements resulted in
some calling them “Millennial Dawners.”[17] In
Elmira, New York, they were the Millennial Dawn Bible Class.[18] In
Flushing, New York, they were “the Millennial Dawn Society.”[19] In
December 1900, Russell spoke to the congregation in Washington, D. C. The
newspaper ad described them as “Millennial Dawn and Zion’s Watch Tower friends.”

illustration

The Washington, D.C., Evening Times, December 1, 1900.

When a Watch Tower convention
was held in Philadelphia in June 1900, they described themselves as Believers
in the Atonement through the Blood of Christ.[20] A
convention held in Denver, Colorado, in 1903 was of “Believers in the Second
Coming.”[21] When Russell addressed a
convention in Omaha, Nebraska, in 1898, they were simply called the “Believers.”
The abbreviation “Believers” was used again the next year in Boston.[22]

illustration

The Courtland, New York,
Standard

November 29, 1902.

In
Albany, New York, Believers in the Restitution met in Fredrick J. Clapham’s
home at 288 First Street. Earlier, at least one meeting was held in a “Bro.
Fletcher’s home.”[23] Elsewhere
the name Millennial Dawn Readers was used.[24]
In Omaha, Nebraska, a newspaper called them Believers, without saying what they
believed.[25] When a one-day convention
featuring C. T. Russell and C. A. Owen, “the local minister,” was announced for
Indianapolis, Indiana, they use a long descriptor instead of a pithy name,
calling themselves “believers on the lines of Millennial dawn [sic], and of the
ransom of the whole human race by the blood of Jesus Christ.”[26]

The
Cincinnati, Ohio, congregation advertised meetings as The Church of Believers.
In 1891 they met at 170 Walnut Street, Room 8, for “instruction and
fellowship.”[27] In late 1891, J. B.
Adamson held weekly meetings there. Russell reported that Adamson had
circulated “about 4000 Millennial Dawns,” adding that Adamson and wife “have
done and are doing a good work –gathering ripe wheat and witnessing to others.
Sunday Meetings held by Brother A. help to water the good word of present truth
which he scatters during the week by circulating MILLENNIAL DAWN.”[28] By
May 1892 the Cincinnati Believers were meeting at 227 Main Street, and inviting
people to “free lectures on present truths, in accord with the Bible, explained
by Millennial Dawn.” The Believer’s advertisement said that “these lectures
show the grand harmony of our Creator’s plan of the ages, the high calling and
the restitution of all.”[29]

Adamson
found interest in a “Dr. A _____.”[30]
While we can’t identify him more specifically, he testified to others in the
Cincinnati medical community. An advertisement in the December 27, 1894, Enquirer
placed by a W. Val Stark read: “I should like to meet a young man familiar with
the ‘Millennial Dawns’ who desires to actively further their notice on the
churches.”[31] Stark gave his address as
44 West 9th Street, the address of the Cincinnati Sanitarium, a private
hospital treating insanity and addiction. Despite a fairly large circulation of
Millennial Dawn volumes, the congregation remained small. Thirty-seven were
present for the annual communion celebration; eleven of these were newly
interested.[32]

At
Los Angeles, California, in 1899 they advertised themselves as The Gospel
Church (Millennial Dawn). By 1902 they were using Millennial Dawn Readers, and
in 1903 they were Millennial Dawn Friends. There are several examples of
Russell suggesting that they were The Christians. For instance, when he spoke
for an extended period on Boston Commons in 1897, The Cato, New York,
Citizen described him as “the leader of a new sect called simply ‘The
Christians.’”[33] An invitation for a Watch
Tower meeting late in 1901, described it as “a convention of believers in the
great redemption sacrifice of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.”[34]
When the Flint, Michigan, congregation listed itself in the newspaper church
directory it was as “Zion’s Watchtower People.”[35]
In Warfdale, England, they called themselves The Church of Christ. The
London Daily News said they were more commonly known as “Millennial Dawn.”[36]

illustration

The Los Angeles Herald, December 31, 1899.

illustration

The Los Angeles Herald, July 4, 1902.

illustration

The Los Angeles Herald, May 10, 1903

illustration

The Los Angeles Herald, November 8, 1903

Outsiders were pressed to find
descriptors. When Sam Williams, one of the organizers of the Huston, Texas, congregation
preached there in 1903, The Huston Daily Post described the movement as “those
of Mr. Williams’ faith,” attaching no other name. Earlier The Post
described it as Millennial Dawn faith.[37]
The 1912 Morrison and Fourmy Directory of Houston listed them as
Millennial Dawn Church. This difficulty continued for some years.

illustrations

Convention Ribbon -
1899 and Convention Program - 1898.

illustration

Indianapolis
News,
February 20, 1897

Identity confusion followed Watch Tower publications
and evangelists. A Watch Tower evangelist speaking at Poole’s Hall in
Indianapolis, Indiana, included in the newspaper announcement that his meeting
was not “Catholic Apostolic.” Another example comes from a period somewhat
later than we consider in this book. At the request of a Mrs. A. Axtell, ThePerry, New
York,
Record ran a brief article correcting
rumors about a “Millennial Dawn” meeting held in a private home:

Will you kindly give space in your paper for the
correction of the rumor to the effect that the meetings recently held at the
home of Mr. and Mrs. A. Axtell, were in the interest of Mormon belief?

And let it be known, that instead they were Bible
instructions along the line taught by “The Millennial Dawn Series.”

Further, as a correction to one other rumor, let it be
suggested that all lovers of the truth read carefully, with an open Bible, Vol.
V of “Millennial Dawn,” before coming to hastily to the conclusion that the
author does not worship the Lord Jesus Christ.[38]

In 1909 someone asked Russell: “By what name would you
suggest that the local classes advertise their meetings, so as to avoid the
confusion of a multiplicity of titles, such as: “Millennial Dawn,” “Believers
in the Atonement,” “Believers in the Precious Blood,” “Bible Students,” etc.”
Russell’s answer is illuminating:

It
is a difficult matter to know how to advertise, not for ourselves, but
difficult to keep from being misunderstood by the people. “Church of God”; “Church
of the Living God”; “Church of Christ.” Any of those names would suit us very well,
and we would have no objections to them, but we find that there are various
denominations who have appropriated those titles, not that we think they have a
right to apply them to themselves, but we would like to live in peace. It is a
difficult matter to decide, and each class will have to do that for themselves.[39]

In his view they were to body
of Christ, and while true sheep may be found within other churches, the various
denominations were not of the Body of Christ. They were false religions. In the
earliest period, Watch Tower evangelists never identified themselves with a
church. They presented themselves as connected to Zion’s Watch Tower or
to the Tower Publishing Company. Or they lectured without suggesting any
affiliation, mentioning only the location of their speech. As congregations
were formed, an organizational name became more pressing. James A. West, once a
Methodist clergyman, lectured in Brooklyn, delivering the first of an eight
part series on “the plan of the ages.” A reporter asked him the name of the new
church. There was none:

A new church, which puts forth the claim of being The
Church, was opened yesterday afternoon in Co-operative hall, Howard avenue and
Madison street, up on the fourth floor, in a comfortably and rather prettily appointed
lodge room. The minister was James A. West, who was once, it is understood, a
Methodist minister in the West. He had an audience of probably sixty people.
His discourse was the first of eight lectures on “God’s Plan of the Ages,”
taking into consideration the “Millennial Dawn.” A large chart back of the
platform depicted the different ages of the world, the birth of the world, its
growth, the flood age, the present age, etc. Mr. West makes a decided claim for
undenominationalism, saying there is but one head of a church, who is Christ.
All churches are wrong in maintaining their different grades and conditions of
doctrine, and in this way Mr. West claims for his followers that they are the
church.[40]

Russell
continued to iterate this concept, and we find it expressed in a September
1901, lecture at Rochester, New York:

We are not a denomination, not a sect. I don’t know
how many belong to our church. It is a church where no names are written. Our
church consists of those who believe in Jesus Christ as Redeemer and make a
full consecration to Him. We are trying to find them. All of our effort is to
find who are His. We are not in any list of churches or sects. The true church
has never been known by a name. We are satisfied to be known unto the Lord.[41]

[1]This is true of Russell for the decade he associated
with Age-to-Come believers.

[4]Extracts
from the Bible, The Glens Falls, New York, Morning Star¸ November 11,
1897. According to the 1870
Census, William H. Gildersleeve was born in New York about 1842, or according
to the 1892 New York State Census he was born near 1837. [Census record birth
dates often conflict.] He seems to have been related to H. H. Gildersleeve, a
cigar manufacturer in Glens Falls. In April 1884, a devastating fire broke out
in rental space in a building he owned. [New York Times, April 29,
1884.] A newspaper article [Glens Falls Morning Star¸ January 22, 1895]
notes him as prominent in the Methodist Episcopal Church.

[5]Untitled notices, The Glens Falls, New York, Morning
Star, June 26, 1899 and October 21, 1901.

[14]Hessler was born about 1848. The 1880 Census tells us
that he was widowed. He subsequently remarried. He was a cabinet maker, and
later a contractor. Advertisements for his remodeling and cabinet and flooring business
appear in the Scranton Tribune [eg. October 7, 1898, and June 5, 1899 issues].

[15]End of the World in 1914, The Brazil,
Indiana, Weekly
Democrat, October 17, 1912.

[19]Consigned to a Private Hospital, The Cincinnati, Ohio,
Enquirer, June 13, 1904.

[20]Believers in Atonement Services, The Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, Inquirer¸ June 18, 1900. This name was used for
several conventions. Another example is, also from Philadelphia, is mentioned
in The Fort Wayne, Indiana, Sentinal, December 30, 1902.

[21]Millennium in Sight, The Brooklyn,
New York, Daily
Eagle, July 12, 1903.

[23]His Second Coming, The Albany,
New York, Evening Journal,
May 28, 1900. Various New
York State Census records tell us Clapham was born in England between 1833 and
1834. He was a shoemaker. We do not know to what degree Clapham was interested
in the Watch Tower message. A newspaper report from 1906 noted that he
faithfully attended the Tabernacle Baptist Church “every Sunday but one in
seven years.” [Albany Evening Journal, June 11, 1906.] We cannot
identify Fletcher.