The trouble is that the consumer of porn does not or does not want to see beyond that smile because they enjoy it, for if they saw tears and screams instead, most could not derive pleasure from it. They don't see the women who are forced into this abhorrent industry through trafficking by pimps who own these valuable commodities, these submissive, yielding, worthless sexual objects. They don't see the absolute power and terror held over them by means of rape, torture, beatings, drugs, and death threats. They don't see the gun pointing at their heads that produces that pleasurable smile, because the pornographers know that if there was no smile—no detection of enjoyment—their profitable empires would more or less collapse.

So, as long as they can manipulate consumers into believing that these women "enjoy" being degraded, debased, and humiliated, they need not worry that their audience would object and reject such a heinous violation of a human being.

The other women (an estimated 70%) that smile are those who have been pimped since childhood, sexually abused since childhood. Be it personal, pornography, or prostitution, these atrocities all develop serious detrimental and external consequences such as drug dependency, alcoholism, self-harm/hatred, and abuse.

The myth that women enjoy pleasurable acts such as fisting, deep throat, and anal penetration comes from the pornographers themselves; they feed these artful lies to the porn consumers. What they fail to say is just how many of these women end up in emergency rooms. No women outside the realms of pornography would find these degrading and seriously damaging acts "sexually enjoyable."

The human right act states ...

that no human being should have to endure abuse/slavery/torture and degradation ... in the political sense of the word, but that obviously does not apply to pornography, prostitution, and slave trafficking.

In the US, the courts uphold rights for consumers to possess pornography because it violates the "freedom of speech" protections of the first amendment.

What about the freedom of speech of these violated women? Do they not have "freedom of speech" because they are deemed subhuman? Or is it because ...

they are silenced by a large, raping penis, ramming their throats against a wall for the billion dollar profits and entertainment enjoyed by millions of colluders (conscious or subconscious) who are totally responsible for these odious acts of sexual crimes against women ...