How do you feel that your time as an administrator has contributed to becoming a super administrator: As a Admin i have experience almost everything, Such as Mass rdm+Ltap banning and recent limit bans. I am also an active on the TTT server and on teamspeak. During my time as admin i have learned a lot, dealing with punishment i have faced problems such as people who cheat this is one of the main reasons i have applied for super admin.

What makes you a good candidate for the super administrator team? ( in this part you can go as detailed as you want):

My Activity:
I am a very active player within the TTT server i mostly come on to play the game and have fun, But also i deal with reports during my play time. I believe there is a lack of lead team member's on this makes it easy for people to cheat/hack, But due to my activity i can crack down on players who decide to cheat when other lead team are offline.

Attitude/Behaviour:
I can be both serious and also can have a laugh with players, For example when dealing with report i am serious, I take both side of the story during reports and do not favour people who i like more, Then i punish the user fairly and accordingly if needed. I also try to be friendly with other staff members and players and provide help to others if needed.

Explain a situation as an administrator you encountered that was an obstacle that required the help of a lead team member but you had to work around it when no lead team member was available:
Sometime on the TTT server users use cheat/hack. One time a user came on and used aimbot to lock onto players head. But this player MASS RDMED and LTAP this gave me a reason to ban this user without banning them for aimbot although the user could of been punished quicker if i was a super admin because i would have access to the anti-cheat tools provided by the server.

Explain how you would review and handle an abuse report against another staff member:

If the report abuse was Accepted:

Warning: Spoiler![ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ]

Hello Player, I have looked over your report abuse request and have seen the evidence provided,
and i can conclude that this staff member was abusing, The staff member will be talked to make sure they dont do it again.If you see witness this staff member abusing again please create a report on forums with evidence. Thanks for making this report.

If the report abuse was Denied:

Warning: Spoiler![ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ]

Hello player,After looking over the evidence provided this staff member was not abusing, The staff member will not be talked to and not recieve a demotion.

Explain in detail how you would act in the following situation:A staff member bans a user for an excessive amount of time, how do you approach the staff member to ensure that everyone is treated fairly?

I would talk to the staff member using Teamspeak or steam private message and inform the staff member on how long the player should of been punished and ensure the staff member understands. For an example if the staff member bans the user for MASS RDM+LTAP for 30 days and the player has not recieved any bans before i would tell the staff member that the first ban should be between 1-3 days punishment, Then the users punishment will be reduced to 1-3 days ban.

Explain in detail how you would act in the following situation:A staff member is dealing with a user but is struggling to do so in an appropriate manner. How would you resolve the situation?
If a staff member is struggling with a player who finds it hard to understand a rule i would speak to the user and ensure they know and then i would speak to the staff member and tell them the appropriate way of telling a user who finds it hard to understand a rule.

Explain in detail how you would act in the following situation:A staff member accuses another staff member of breaking rules, how would you help resolve the situation?
I would ask the staff member who is accusing another staff member and ask to see proof of them breaking rules if the staff member has no proof then i will ask the staff member to gather proof and then if proof is provided action will be taken on the staff member who has been accused. Although if the person does not provide proof the player will not be punished.

Explain in detail how you would act in the following situation:A staff member acts in a disrespectful manner towards another staff member and or sparks an argument within the staff team. How do you resolve the situation?
I would Ask the disrespectful staff member on teamspeak. I would inform the Disrespectful staff member of the staff ETHOS and tell them to stop, If the staff member continues then they will be warned and spoken to again. if the continues to go on punishment will be taken on that staff member.

Explain in detail how you would act in the following situation:You spot a staff member breaking rules to the point of harming other users, how do you approach the staff member?
I would tell the staff member in game to stop using the admin chat. Then i will ask the user on to teamspeak and speak to the staff member on how they should act and if the staff member continues they will be given a last warning and if they continue after this they will be punished accordingly.

You don't have enough experience yet and you haven't shown any leadership skills , also your teamspeak activity is (from my knowledge) only when it's time for the meeting , and even then you don't show enough presence within the meetings , you seem to be shy to object when it comes down it

You don't have enough experience yet and you haven't shown any leadership skills , also your teamspeak activity is (from my knowledge) only when it's time for the meeting , and even then you don't show enough presence within the meetings , you seem to be shy to object when it comes down it

Being lead team requires interaction with the concurrent lead team; something that I’ve not seen you do, vocal communication is also key as well as the other standard factors in becoming LT

PERSONAL OPINION BLABLABLA BELOW

That's really shitty. I can understand teamwork and shit and thinking together but I feel as if Lead Team shouldn't be fucking best buds.

This makes opinions unified and basically similar to each other, spending a long amount of time, ESPECIALLY FOR SOMEONE who will try to apply. Because they will try to fit in, seem alike to them, etc. to get the role.

New opinions, UNBIAS OPINIONS are extremely needed.

There's fuck all reason to have 10 people saying the same shit, literally 0, and making users spend a big amount of time together (to get to know them or whatever) does exactly that.

As for the application, DrConor has improved IMMENSELY during his time as staff, I remember how bad he was at the begging but I stuck my neck out for him, for good reason. It's great to see him where he is now, being EXTREMELY consistent and super dedicated to the server, trying to better it day by day and never runs away from the server when he's the only staff member and there's 40+ people who most of which are rulebreaking.

Being lead team requires interaction with the concurrent lead team; something that I’ve not seen you do, vocal communication is also key as well as the other standard factors in becoming LT

i find it hard to interact with a inactive lead team.

Shots fired and yes, I am also an inactive piece of shit as of right now but, he's right. The only people I'd USUALLY see being active active (not just being on for 30-40 minutes) before my inactivity were Johnler, Cranky and Chien. That's kind of it. I'm not saying the rest might've been inactive all the time but since everyone's also complaining about it, I don't think I'm that wrong. Since SA+ are the ones doing the training I feel like activity is somewhat required especially when the new moderators are on because not every single detail can be explained on teamspeak properly - that is of course, leaving everything regarding LT powers aside. I don't want to branch out too much since it's Conor's application but so far since I joined ZARP I really feel like being staff on too many servers is negatively splitting people's dedication and activity given the desire to rise in rank on every server you're staffing. TTT-only active LT members is something the server is lacking and it's quite funny if you compare my previous points about the active active higher ups and badge collections there's something that clicks.

I get Cranky's point, what he's basically saying isn't that they have their own boyscout club as Svanzscape sort of made it to be, it's mostly about getting to know the candidate more than just ingame performance but if you read my point above we need active SA and Conor despite having a shitty start is someone the server currently needs. I'm almost certain he won't disappoint.

Being lead team requires interaction with the concurrent lead team; something that I’ve not seen you do, vocal communication is also key as well as the other standard factors in becoming LT

PERSONAL OPINION BLABLABLA BELOW

That's really shitty. I can understand teamwork and shit and thinking together but I feel as if Lead Team shouldn't be fucking best buds.

This makes opinions unified and basically similar to each other, spending a long amount of time, ESPECIALLY FOR SOMEONE who will try to apply. Because they will try to fit in, seem alike to them, etc. to get the role.

New opinions, UNBIAS OPINIONS are extremely needed.

There's fuck all reason to have 10 people saying the same shit, literally 0, and making users spend a big amount of time together (to get to know them or whatever) does exactly that.

You can't run a restaurant from your home. You have to work in it.

You misunderstood my point Svanz, I didn't exactly say to become LT you had to be best of buds, you just have to chat with Lead Team so we have a better understanding of the user applying, if someone doesn't interact with lead team, how can they become Lead Team? If they are meant to disclose information about staff TO THE LEAD TEAM but they don't, then who's at fault?

It's not about biased opinions, it's about how the Lead Team sees the user working and how they are with teamwork NOT ONLY on TTT but amongst each other LT member within TeamSpeak when trying to resolve situations.DrConor wrote:

i find it hard to interact with a inactive lead team.

the easiest way to do it is find a lead team member in a public spacer and just chat with them, if they are in a private one just poke the staff member asking permission to join and most of the time you'll be moved in. We're not isolated asshats.

Being lead team requires interaction with the concurrent lead team; something that I’ve not seen you do, vocal communication is also key as well as the other standard factors in becoming LT

PERSONAL OPINION BLABLABLA BELOW

That's really shitty. I can understand teamwork and shit and thinking together but I feel as if Lead Team shouldn't be fucking best buds.

This makes opinions unified and basically similar to each other, spending a long amount of time, ESPECIALLY FOR SOMEONE who will try to apply. Because they will try to fit in, seem alike to them, etc. to get the role.

New opinions, UNBIAS OPINIONS are extremely needed.

There's fuck all reason to have 10 people saying the same shit, literally 0, and making users spend a big amount of time together (to get to know them or whatever) does exactly that.

You can't run a restaurant from your home. You have to work in it.

You misunderstood my point Svanz, I didn't exactly say to become LT you had to be best of buds, you just have to chat with Lead Team so we have a better understanding of the user applying, if someone doesn't interact with lead team, how can they become Lead Team? If they are meant to disclose information about staff TO THE LEAD TEAM but they don't, then who's at fault?

It's not about biased opinions, it's about how the Lead Team sees the user working and how they are with teamwork NOT ONLY on TTT but amongst each other LT member within TeamSpeak when trying to resolve situations.DrConor wrote:

i find it hard to interact with a inactive lead team.

the easiest way to do it is find a lead team member in a public spacer and just chat with them, if they are in a private one just poke the staff member asking permission to join and most of the time you'll be moved in. We're not isolated asshats.

Even with my resignation, there are way too many LT members, imo it was a stretch to add Shadow last week even though i said yes. Now don't give the "more can't hurt" stuff to justify it. Thats just not how the system works HOWEVER you are a fantastic staff member from the few times I played with you, I would just make more of a presence at meeting s and you could be a great future LT member.

Even with my resignation, there are way too many LT members, imo it was a stretch to add Shadow last week even though i said yes. Now don't give the "more can't hurt" stuff to justify it. Thats just not how the system works HOWEVER you are a fantastic staff member from the few times I played with you, I would just make more of a presence at meeting s and you could be a great future LT member.

Even with my resignation, there are way too many LT members, imo it was a stretch to add Shadow last week even though i said yes. Now don't give the "more can't hurt" stuff to justify it. Thats just not how the system works HOWEVER you are a fantastic staff member from the few times I played with you, I would just make more of a presence at meeting s and you could be a great future LT member.

Even with my resignation, there are way too many LT members, imo it was a stretch to add Shadow last week even though i said yes. Now don't give the "more can't hurt" stuff to justify it. Thats just not how the system works HOWEVER you are a fantastic staff member from the few times I played with you, I would just make more of a presence at meeting s and you could be a great future LT member.