You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum. This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.

It's a blog, not a new report. I thought it was opinionated too, but I researched the whole situation a bit more and the facts are out there. I didn't know half of that stuff and was skeptical because I had never heard those details, but I couldn't find anything to prove any of that wrong._________________

[quote="SFPatsFan"]

Flaccomania is a genius who is an expert on literally everything he talks about so you should trust him. [/quote]

It's a blog, not a new report. I thought it was opinionated too, but I researched the whole situation a bit more and the facts are out there. I didn't know half of that stuff and was skeptical because I had never heard those details, but I couldn't find anything to prove any of that wrong.

LOL at the comments on the blog. Some people are so consumed by being a "hater" that they just can't let rational discussion on a subject occur. LOL especially at the guy using Wikipedia.

Two things...
1.) Just so we're clear, you are indeed welching on the sig bet. You see, the sig calls for one to wear a SIG until the draft. Your signature combines two different sigs in the same way that imani does with his avatar. This therefore gives you plural properties on your sig... and is therefore a welch on the terms that call for ONLY a singular sig of which the other person crafts to be worn until the draft.

To expand, he provided you a link to the sig that you're supposed to wear. To even combine the sigs in the way that you are requires one to post that link into a web generator that then combines up to three potential sigs into one link. Now what your particular link does is that it generates multiple sigs. So with each page generation, the link code that you post into your signature will thus choose to generate one of the three links from the alternate website storage location. For as long as it chooses the link that DTMB had supplied to you, there isn't a welch on terms. But you see, if just once it decides to generate the OTHER link... it has indeed broken the terms of your signature bet. You see, it's simple web code understanding. And you've failed at it. Your logic is flawed.

2. Also while my mod powers cannot discipline against sig bet welching, it does however force me to provide a civil warning for the use of a signature that does not meet this forums standards. Your second generated sig exceeds the size limits of this forum. If in a couple of days when I reload this page and it exceed the size requirements, I will formally push this along to the Webmaster to deal with._________________