It's GOOD

If the USADA's claims are right, Armstrong lied, cheated, and further tainted the sport of cycling. But the victories that came from it, had an undeniably positive impact, dubbed the 'Lance Armstrong Effect' - does the good outweigh the bad?

The way I see it, people are complicated, and sometimes good people do bad things. I don't think Armstrong's good impact outweighs his bad actions, or vice versa. In my opinion, he's just an athlete who used his (ill-begotten) fame to promote a good cause.