Does age limit law career options?

Is anyone aware of any limiting conditions imposed on older-than normal law school graduates because of their age? For example, if one graduates from law school at age 29, do you know if one's age would in any way limit one's professional options (i.e. private practice, professorship, clerkship, public interest law)?

Is anyone aware of any limiting conditions imposed on older-than normal law school graduates because of their age? For example, if one graduates from law school at age 29, do you know if one's age would in any way limit one's professional options (i.e. private practice, professorship, clerkship, public interest law)?

I'll graduate at 30 and I asked this same question in the judicial clerkship context. The people I talked to - who were all former clerks themselves - said it could only be beneficial, from a maturity and experience perspective. Not sure how firms feel about hiring us old people as new associates. There's probably some perception that we're less willing to work in sweatshop conditions for 5 years. And I suspect there are some firms that want that - as many mindless drones with as much "productivity" as they can milk out of them, and other firms that actually want first year associates with the potential to take on more responsiblity sooner.

They probably already have a steady career and a JD likely only acts as a supplement or increases their job responsibilities in an active career. I doubt many at that age participate in the rat race of finding their first law job or at least finding a position with a large amount of responsibility. Otherwise I'm sure there is some fine small firm out there that doesn't care how old you are.

Age can only help. Two of the offers I have for a summer associate position are from firms who ONLY interview candidates with work experience prior to law school. Apparently more and more firms are doing this. Most of my 2L classmates who don't have offers at the moment went straight through undergrad to law school and are quite young. Age and experience are a definite plus.

Age can only help. Two of the offers I have for a summer associate position are from firms who ONLY interview candidates with work experience prior to law school. Apparently more and more firms are doing this. Most of my 2L classmates who don't have offers at the moment went straight through undergrad to law school and are quite young. Age and experience are a definite plus.

Are you high? Of course age can hurt. Some of these places don't give a @#!* about your work experience, they just want young strong-backed workers, preferably white and male (once they've filled their quotas). Who do you think a firm can squeeze more blood out of? A 25 year old, or a 33 year old? Who on average is going to have more health problems? Who might start being more concerned about his or her children or spouse? It's rotten and illegal, but some of these firms do it anyhow!