On 30 Aug 2005, at 2:02 pm, david coornaert wrote:
> Which of these PVFS2 Lustre GPFS have some level of redundancy ?
GPFS can be configured to store two copies of all the data (which
helps read performance too, since it gives an extra path to the data).
Lustre stores everything as RAID5, so I understand, and the metadata
servers are in pairs, so there's plenty of redundancy there. Don't
know about PVFS2, but the consensus in our group is that it has less
redundancy.
Tim
--
Dr Tim Cutts
Informatics Systems Group, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
GPG: 1024D/E3134233 FE3D 6C73 BBD6 726A A3F5 860B 3CDD 3F56 E313 4233
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://bioinformatics.org/pipermail/bioclusters/attachments/20050830/5da1ff06/attachment.html