Shadow Tongue.

Tom Birkett’s TLS review of Paul Kingsnorth’s novel The Wake, “set in the aftermath of 1066, during the period of resistance to the Norman invasion,” makes it sound quirkily interesting in a linguistic way:

As the author explains, this account of invasion and insurgency is written in a “shadow tongue”, a curious imitation of Old English “intended to project a ghost image of the speech patterns of a long-dead land”. This involves limiting the protagonist’s vocabulary to words with Germanic roots for the most part, as well as reviving several Old English terms including “smearcian”, a verb meaning both “to smirk” and “to smile”, whose duality is exploited effectively to heighten the paranoia that plagues the narrator. The noun “stenc”, meaning “smell”, but surviving as “stench” is another word deployed with unsettling effect, and other less-familiar words such as “scucca”, “gebur” and “esol” are used so frequently that they present few barriers to fluent reading. This shadow language underscores our distance from the world Buccmaster describes, while recalling what Geoffrey Hill refers to as the “strange likeness” of this culture.

Since the Old English words that survive into the modern language tend to refer to the natural world and everyday objects and actions, our continuing relationship to the landscape is reinforced at a linguistic level. The limited vocabulary also gives the novel a feeling of constriction that adds enormously to the protagonist’s progressive isolation. Reading this imitative language as an Anglo-Saxonist, there were a few places where I felt the rich Old English word-hoard was done a disservice – particularly in the liberal use of “Anglo-Saxon” language of another kind – and there are other moments where the idiom is more “Merrie Olde England” than pseudo-Old English, but the “shadow tongue” is nonetheless an impressive simulation.

The review ends, “the message of this extraordinary novel is as honest and timely as it is discomforting: being waecend to the grim fate of your society doesn’t mean you can do anything to prevent it happening. Ultimately, The Wake highlights the difficulty of finding triewth in a world where comfortable certainties have been eroded and words no longer mean what you expect them to mean.” Thanks, jamessal!

“my father Galiaudo always use to say I must have a gift of Santa maria of Roboreto because since I was a little pup if somebody say just quinkue five V words I could do their talk right off whether they came from Terdona or from Gavi and even from Mediolanum where they talk stranger than dogs, anyway even when I met the first Alamanni in my life who were laing siege seige seege to Terdona, all Toische and nasty and they say rousz and Myn got, before the day was over I was saying rousz and Myn got too and they woiud wwould say to me Kint go find us a pretty Frouwe and we’ll do fiki fiki even is she doesn’t wan to just tell us where she is and we’ll grab her fast”

Belatedly: Having just read this book because the description here made me curious, I suspect knowledge of (current? historic?) Midlands/Lincolnshire dialects would help contextualize some of the author’s grammatical and phonetic choices regarding the simplification that led to his shadow language. At least, I hope that’s what was going on.

Still, it’s a fun read for the language if you can handle the protagonist. Or a fun read for the psychology if you can handle the language, whichever your preference.

Oh, actually… now that I remember northern German weirdness, you may be right. I’m thinking of:
1) -’sch adjectives formed from personal names, clearly shortened from -isch. They correspond to English adjectives like Darwinian, but also to plain genitives: Newton’s laws are die Newton’schen/newtonschen Gesetze. Not only haven’t I encountered this shortening anywhere except in adjectives formed from place names in northwestern Germany (hannoversch, hannöversch, bönnsch, kölsch), I’ve always found it thoroughly weird to form such adjectives in the first way. The expected Standard German solution would be to use the genitive or to resort to compounding. Indeed, I just found a case where the German Wikipedia even prefers resorting to “of” over a -’sch adjective.
2) Französische Straße in Berlin heavily implies to me there’s something French about that street. There isn’t, it’s named after the French and would be Franzosenstraße farther south.

David: I’ve always found it thoroughly weird to form such adjectives in the first way. The expected Standard German solution would be to use the genitive or to resort to compounding.

What about Kölnisch Wasser, known to the rest of mankind as Eau de Cologne? I’m not a native but I believe it to have the prosody of a compund, like blueberries vs blue berries. And Köln (Cologne) isn’t that far north. Do you find Kölnisch Wasser weird?

There’s a second reason, too: the lack of declension on the neuter adjective (instead of *Kölnisches Wasser). Nowadays that’s another vaguely northern feature, though it was more widespread in Early New High German some 500 years ago.

And you can support my book habit without even spending money on me by following my Amazon links to do your shopping (if, of course, you like shopping on Amazon); I get a small percentage of every dollar spent while someone is following my referral links, and every month I get a gift certificate that allows me to buy a few books (or, if someone has bought a big-ticket item, even more). You will not only get your purchases, you will get my blessings and a karmic boost!

Favorite rave review, by Teju Cole:
"Evidence that the internet is not as idiotic as it often looks. This site is called Language Hat and it deals with many issues of a linguistic flavor. It's a beacon of attentiveness and crisp thinking, and an excellent substitute for the daily news."

From "commonbeauty"

(Cole's blog circa 2003)

All comments are copyright their original posters. Only messages signed "languagehat" are property of and attributable to languagehat.com. All other messages and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily state or reflect those of languagehat.com. Languagehat.com does not endorse any potential defamatory opinions of readers, and readers should post opinions regarding third parties at their own risk. Languagehat.com reserves the right to alter or delete any questionable material posted on this site.