AND unless some Americans are “worth” more than others, why exactly did the Traitor-in-Chief ignore pleas from the Foley and Satloff families, when they begged his admin to negotiate over the release of their sons? In stark juxtaposition, he paid (out of taxpayer monies, no less) a huge monetary ransom, and released stone cold Islamic killers (to kill again) for a deserter’s release! On the other hand, his surrogates threatened the Foley’s and Satloff’s: don’t dare pay any ransom! What’s going on?

NOW, just for the record, this investigative journalist is against paying any ransom for hostages, “negotiating”, but at least this position is consistent. No exceptions. Okay?

STILL, before you review the additional evidence cited below, let’s cut to the chase: if Bergdahl – through his own desertion and attendant Taliban affinity/sympathy – as well as his papa are not Muslims, in league with the Islamic enemy, well, this investigative journalist is not an American Conservative patriot, nor a right wing, nationalist Zionist, revealed by countless actions, words, and deeds. Ridiculous.

The Obama administration of course has vigorously pushed back, saying there has been no decision to prosecute Bergdahl and that reports are way off base.

But how could Obama’s testimony that “reports are off base” be more credible than members of Bergdahl’s unit who served beside him came forward and told their version of Bergdahl’s military exploits said that not only he deserted his unit but took up with enemy forces. In fact, some of these voices came out right after the deal but were ignored.

For one thing, the Government Accountability Office says that if he really is a deserter, the trade to return him was illegal. For another, we know from the Army brass’ response to the Fort Hood massacre by Maj. Nidal Hasan — which is still classified as “workplace violence” — the Army’s own credibility is also under a cloud. But the question is, who is behind all this twisting if not for Obama? It was the White House who termed the Taliban as “Armed Insurgents” instead of “Terrorists,” a term that does not hold water.

While many think that the Obama was simply touting how he was able to free an American soldier who was captured by the Taliban, but why release top 5 terrorist leaders instead of one?Why smile as soon as he heard the most famous war cry of Islam, “bismillah al-rahman al-rahim,” Arabic for “in the name of Allah the most gracious, the most merciful.”

The “basmallah” is another Islamic expression for victory and only indicates that Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s father is a Muslim.

And why would the man be simply acting as “Muslim” for a stealth operation to rescue his son who was already in good hands in Germany at that time? And what is with the long beard and trimmed mustache?
Such practice fits with the profile of a Muslim Jihadist.

When father and son trim their mustache and gives the basmallah and elongate their beards, the chances go higher that these were converts to Islam, just as that an ex-Muslim putting on a cross and saying, “In the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit,” is evidence enough of conversion to Christianity.

But is it the speech with the Basmallah, the beard and the trimmed mustache, the testimonies from his colleagues on his desertion, that confirm our suspicion that these men are Jihadi converts?

Well, it’s a start, but the relationship of father and son in mimicking the same traits as Taliban should be cause of some red flags. Perhaps Robert Bowe Bergdahl should tell us under oath why his favorites on his Youtube account reveal a dark mind, a collector of a litany of ‘terrorist favorites’, videos from training on how to become Muslim Jihadist to urging American troops to desert and even favorite speeches by confirmed terrorists like Shaykh Anwar al-Awlaki, condemning America as a terrorist state:

On one of the videos Bergdahl subscribes to a Jihadi message titled, “Duaa (prayer).”

But prayer for what? His son’s release only? Hardly, it’s for the release of the terrorists in American captivity. The prayer begins in Arabic, as Shoebat.com translates:

O Allah, release our prisoners, the Muslim prisoners, and send them back to our families in peace!

“Al-Hamdu Lillah, Ameen, Ameen May the duas of the ummah be heard and may Allah free my son from captivity! بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ إِيَّاكَ نَعْبُدُ وَإِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِينُ”

English:

Praise be to Allah, Amen, Amen, my prayers for all the Muslim Nation (ummah) be heard and may Allah free my son from captivity. In the name of Allah most merciful most beneficient, it is thee whom I worship, it is thee whom I seek refuge.

He types perfect Arabic and announces he is Muslim, “thee [Allah] I worship …”

Another favorite is a lecture from Mufti Ismail Menk, who identifies himself as a Muslim scholar titled “Qualities Of A True Worshipper”. Menk was also a favorite of Boston bombing suspect Dzhokar Tsarnaev.

Another video favorited by Bergdahl, is a Muslim jihadist terrorist video uploaded by the Afghan Islamic Emirate (the same group the 5 terrorists, who Obama helped released and who Bergdahl praisingly communicated with, were a part of) on August 5, 2013, in which a verse from the Koran is chanted:

Fight them, so that there will be no mischief, and the religion will be all Allah’s (Surah 39)

Were the Bergdahl’s quotes from the Quran used for their personal uplifting to fight the Taliban?

The rest of the video is in Pharsi:

It appears that Bergdahl speaks Pharsi, since the video is in Pharsi, and he speaks to his son in Pharsi. The video also shows the logo of the Afghan Islamic Emirate. The video also shows dead American soldiers and praises the killing of them.

Indeed, while the Bismillah is not evidence to terrorism, but when Bergdahl learned such slogans by watching jihadist instructional videos on how to praise Allah, it adds to our reasons. He was learning these slogans from this video right here:

One of his favorite videos is Ayat Al-Kursi, a Quranic prayer Muslims use to personally invoke Allah’s protection. It is recited personally when one travels or is in need of divine protection.

The fact that he favorited this video explaining a private Muslim prayer, shows that Bergdahl was not interested in just having the appearance of a Muslim, but is truly Muslim with great inner conviction.

In another video, titled: Beautiful verses from Noble Quran PART 2, he comments:

Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds (this world and the underworld), the owner of the day of judgment.

Perhaps the Bergdahls would tell us why they subscribe to Al-Ghurabaa Media, a virulent Jihadi youtube media that features Usama bin Laden. Another subscription to Dawar Lodin learning Pashtun military terms:

He alsosubscribes to one Sheikh Raed
to learn Islamic prayers in Arabic.

The Taliban even said that Robert Bowe Bergdahl’s son, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, converted to Islam, changed his name to Abdullah, and even trained the Taliban in bomb making techniques.

And why did Bob. Sgt. Bergdahl’s father have direct communications with one of the top three Taliban spokespersons named Abdulqader Balkhi. Was he planning to smoke a Hukkah? Drink Afghan tea?

No

He had messaged this top Taliban spokesperson a message for future victories:

I am still working to free all Guantanamo prisoners. God will repay for the death of every afghan child, amen!

Even on Intelius, it shows Robert Bowe Bergdahl worked for the Taliban:

This makes the entire story very suspicious, not only of the Bargdahls, but of Obama himself who trades five Muslims who are part of a terrorist group, for a man whose father is associated with the same terrorist group. Balkhi is also a spokesperson for the Taliban. Balkhi was the main spokesperson for Taliban when the U.S. Embassey was attacked in Kabul.

And why would Obama, a convert from Islam to Christianity gain for Christianity doing this deal? Better yet, what was he gaining for Islam in this deal instead of Christianity? Why would Obama release Muhammad Fadel, one of the Taliban’s senior military commanders and the Taliban army Chief of staff of the tenth Division Commander, and the Deputy Secretary of Defense? Why release Khairullah Khairkhwa, was the interior minister in the Taliban regime? He is also one of the most prominent Taliban officials since its inception in 1994, so he is considered one of the most respected and most influential in the movement. He was detained by Pakistani authorities in 2002 and handed over to the United States , according to the same source.

Why release Mullah Norullah Noori who was responsible for Balkh province (north) in the Taliban regime? Why release Abdul Haq Wasiq, deputy director of intelligence in the Taliban regime, one of the founders of the movement?

Why not some low-level operatives?

Bergdahl hated America. In one email he wrote:

I am sorry for everything. The horror that is America is disgusting.

It is obvious that Obama, in his last term, is becoming blatant with his Islamic sympathies.

TO wit, if past and present behavior patterns – of both Gitmo terrorists and the Jihadi-in-Chief – are predictors of future behavior, it goes without saying that HUSSEIN Obama will predictably release the remainder of the TOP Gitmo terrorists. Absolutely, his surrogates are working towards this end, even though many already set free have re-joined Islamic jihad!

BUT never mind, let’s not quibble. Besides, keeping jihadis behind bars is a far cry from what “Allah’s (White House) Muslim Terrorist” has on tap. Not at all.

THEREBY, what do patriots think about their renegade Commander-in-Chief providing the likes of top al Qaeda terrorists, Abu Faraj al Libi and Abd al Rahim al Nashiri, with SKYPE video conferences with their families, for starters? They are hardly the only Gitmo beneficiaries of HUSSEIN Obama’s (taxpayer-funded) bounty. Moreover, what about this treacherous act from the Jihadi-in-Chief:

IN the main, future generations will hand down the harshest condemnation, as they should, against those who sat still. Assuredly, such outright, out-sized, clear-cut treason requires appropriate remedies to save the nation. Yes, if the above does not qualify as actionable, pray tell, what will?