Thursday, December 28, 2017

“Better to write for
yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly(1903 - 1974)

Can Trump Can Save
Western Civilization?

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for

‘THE
BOTTOM LINE’

Posted December 28, 2017

A new year’s resolution

Trump
can save Western civilization. Not necessarily because of his policies, but rather,
his unorthodox political style may have created a new political reality in
which old ideas are being re-examined or even thrown out. While new ideas are
being seriously considered, this may be vital to a successful and functional
country, and it may just mean the public is ready to have an honest conversation
about the effects of Islam on our society.

After
25 years of Middle Eastern studies and Islamic ideology, I have a single
mission in this and that is to educate the public about the dangers of Islam
and promote people and policies which are effective in working against
it.

Contrary
to public opinion, we are not at war with radical Islam or Terrorism. We are at
war with the fundamental ideology of Islam itself as taught in the Quran. I challenge
you to get one and read it.

While
I hold a wide range of political opinions and loyalties. I feel this
strengthens our country and helps us build the broadest possible coalition to
defeat Islamic Jihad and the agenda of the world Nation of Islam by
infiltration or by force and violence.

By
maintaining partisan neutrality, we Americans are in a unique position to nudge
the world one step closer to resolving the international problem of Islamic
Jihad that causes so much harm to so many all over the world.

Which
brings me back to Trump. The president’s style can be understood through the
context of the political philosophy called the “Overton Window.” Formulated
by Joe
Overtonin the 1990s, the theory
maintains that there is an acceptable range of politically viable ideas on any
given issue, framed by the range of ideas held by the public. For example,
discussions of taxes mostly focus on raising or lowering existing taxes and
essentially tinkering with the current system. Rarely do you hear a politician
proposing something genuinely fundamental, like abolishing the illegal and
unconstitutional income tax altogether and replacing it with something like a
flat sales tax of 15%. This is because the idea is too unusual, untested and
novel for most people to be willing to consider.

“So, if
a think tank’s research and the principles of sound policy suggest a particular
idea that lies outside the Overton window, what is to be done? “Shift the window,” Nathan
Russell wrote for the MacKinac Institute in an essay explaining the Overton
window. “Since commonly held ideas, attitudes and presumptions frame what is politically
possible and create the ‘window,’ a change in the opinions held by politicians
and the people in general will shift it. Move the window of what is politically
possible and those policies previously impractical can become the next great
popular and legislative rage.”

Trump has been a brick
through that window.

Among
other things, he has triggered a cultural moment where people are now
discussing issues like Islamic Jihad in an open candid way for the first time
in decades.

Trump
can save the West by reigniting that most important ingredient in a functional society:
THE ENGAGED
CITIZEN.

THE BOTTOM LINE:My new year’s resolution
is, among general truth and freedom: In 2018, I intend to use this opportunity
to keep speaking about the dangers of Islam, and tap into a public that is
ready to look at a new approach, and a real honest solution to this on-going global
challenge. One only needs to look at the effects of Islam on Europe to
understand that we as Americans certainly do not want that here.

What
about you???

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight
for truth and freedom. If you would like
to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com

-
de Andréa

Please
pass on this article to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for your friends to
hear the truth.

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

“Better to write for
yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly(1903 - 1974)

Reminiscent
Of The Grisly Nazi Era

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for

‘THE
BOTTOM LINE’

Posted December 27, 2017

Warning: This is graphically described.

Has the world returned to the caveman
barbarism of prehistoric epochs, or have we just exceeded the inhumanity of
Adolph Eichmann? Or maybe we have just gone MAD!

You can
now display the head of a human baby on your wall right next to your deer or
bears head. And that’s not all, you can
have a purse or a leather jacket made from the skin of murdered human babies. Is this really progress! If it is, then please
stop the world, I want to get off!

Big
business in the sale of human baby organ’s and other parts…

A biotech firm has been caught selling the heads of murdered
babies. Undercover agents on behalf of the Reuters news agency engaged in
transactions to purchase the heads of those babies. Officials find the
little bodies of four aborted babies in its warehouse.

A grisly case coming out of the Islamic state of Michigan is
once again putting the spotlight on the sale of murdered baby parts.

As part of the news agency’s examination of the industry, for
example, a Reuters reporter was able to purchase two human heads and a cervical
spine from Restore Life USA, a broker based in U.S. Representative Marsha Blackburn’s
home state of Tennessee. The deals were struck after just a few emails, at a
cost of $900 plus shipping.

Once officials were alerted, the biotech firm’s warehouse was
raided. There, officials found the intact bodies of four additional aborted
children.

Confidential photographs (that I will not show here) reviewed
by Reuters show that Federal agents discovered four preserved dead children in
the Detroit warehouse of a man who sold human body parts. The dead babies were
found during a December 2013 raid of businessman Arthur Rathburn’s warehouse.
The babies, which appear to have been in their second trimester, were submerged
in a liquid that included human brain tissue.

In four of the photos, a crime scene investigator in a hazmat
suit uses forceps to lift a different fetus from the brownish liquid. In three
other photos, a marker that includes a government evidence identification
number lies beside a fetus.

The firm is ironically known as ‘Restore Life’ and its website indicates that it works very
closely with universities to provide them with cadavers for research. But the
investigation by Reuters makes it clear that the biotech firm moved beyond
cadavers to engage in the mass sale of parts from children who may have been
purposely killed for body part trafficking.

The extensive Reuters news report brings to mind the
shocking discoveries of the sales of aborted baby parts by the ‘Planned
Parenthood Murder Incorporated’ and other mass murder companies. Although the
sale of body parts from aborted babies is technically illegal the law is very
convoluted and Planned Parenthood likely did its best to make its actions
appear as legal as possible — although the sales of aborted baby parts is
clearly unethical.

Members of Congress are very concerned about the
discoveries and their implications.

“This needs to be reviewed,” said U.S. Representative
Marsha Blackburn, a Republican from Tennessee who recently chaired a special
U.S. House committee on the use of human fetal tissue.

Blackburn recoiled when a Reuters reporter showed her some
of the photographs, taken by government officials involved in the raid.

“The actions depicted in these photos are an insult to human
dignity,” said
U.S. Representative Bob Goodlatte, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. A
Republican from Virginia, Goodlatte said that “if individuals violate federal
laws and traffic in body parts of unborn children for monetary gain, they
should be held accountable.”

Extremely discerning
clientele can now purchase their own one-of-a-kind ‘human leather’ products
such as wallets, belts, and shoes online but prices start at $14,000 USD,
according to the company which handcrafts the items out of the ‘finest leather
known.’

That’s right, you can now order your
very own wallet or belt made from a previously living human being despite the
fact that human leather, much like certain fur, is illegal. [emphasis added]

Welcome to ][umanLeather. We are specialists in producing
exquisite and exclusive products for an extremely discerning clientele.
All products are carefully hand-crafted by experienced master craftsmen, with
years of experience in handling the finest leather known - human leather.

We only craft the best and most beautiful products out of our
unique leather. We have produced bespoke items for some of our clients,
but due to the limited size of the lengths that we work with, we are limited to
what items we can fashion out of the leather.

We cater to a small but highly discerning clientele. They
are amongst those lucky few who have everything they could possibly
desire. Our supply is restricted and we prefer to keep it that way as we
are the only firm in the world that crafts these special products.

When
navigating around the site, errors are encountered when trying to view the
"home" page and the "About" page. The site is
registered to a Non-UK individual named Vatsyayana Kama. When this name
is searched, the results produced are strange, indicating this may not be a
real person. The results produce listings for "The Kama Sutra of
Vatsyayana," "Vatsyayana – an Indian philosopher who lived in the
second century AD, and books on "The Kama Sutra." This is very
telling indeed.

While they claim to have
individuals willing to "donate" material for their production, and
have turned some "donors" away citing "we can accept only the
highest quality human skin." How would that be
determined? Now, does anyone actually believe this "company"
gets their "material" from donors? It's hard to even
contemplate that anyone would "donate" their body to have their skin
made into "human" leather products. Wouldn’t the “highest
quality human skin” come only from babies???

Walking around decked out in
human leather shoes, belt and wallet since it brings with it the comparison of
the movies' portrayal of indigenous Amazon peoples walking around with shrunken
heads on their belts or the taxidermied heads of human babies like trophies on
a wall. Once that vision is placed on the back burner, one has to
question what kind of inhuman people are these, where is the investigation into
this company? The site was registered in 2008. With all the
surveillance of individuals worldwide and internet traffic, why hasn't any law
enforcement agency come forward with an announcement on an investigation?

In an article appearing in
October of 2013 on the site dailydot.com,
the author states, "Books bound in human skin are a staple of horror
movies, and there are even a few kicking around in real life.
One tends to assume that the practice has pretty much died out, but it hasn’t, at
least because it is (or should be) illegal."

THE BOTTOM LINE: It
is enough to throw one into a temporary cognitive dissonance when looking at
this site on the web. Is there anything anymore disgusting after
murdering innocent babies in or outside the womb than this? Yes there is, the merchandizing
of human baby body parts.

One has to face the pure
evil of this company producing this type of product. It shows there are
no moral boundaries when it comes to making money.

Some people of this world
have devolved and degenerated into something worse than animals, so far there is
no hope for them without Jesus Christ. To the people making this product,
and those who would even contemplate a purchase such as this, Shame on
you! Ask for salvation, forgiveness and repent of your sins. And, law
enforcement agencies, such as Scotland Yard and Interpol, needs to investigate
this company to determine if any crimes have been committed in addition to
dealing in an illegal product.

I would also like to suggest that you use the email address above and
also send a message to Scotland Yard asking them why they have aloud this kind
of insanity of HUMAN LEATHER to continue since 2008.

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight
for truth and freedom. If you would like
to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com

-
de Andréa

Please
pass on this article to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for your friends to
hear the truth.

Monday, December 25, 2017

“Better to write for
yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly(1903 - 1974)

A Real American Law
Abiding Hero

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for

‘THE
BOTTOM LINE’

Posted December 25, 2017

Once in a great while - we discover a real American. The kind of
American the Framers had in mind. A
Constitutional American, the kind that built this country of prosperity and
morality. The independent American capable of independent thought. The kind
that fought for our independence from European oppression in the 1770’s. How
many are left? Can you count them on your fingers and toes?

Well there is at
least one left, and he lives in Texas. Stephen Willeford a local man who shot the Texas
church shooter and then he chased after the gunman.

Stephen Willeford, a resident of
Sunderland Springs, was at home when his daughter came to his bedroom and told
him that she heard gunshots coming from the First Baptist Church nearby.

“I kept hearing the shots, one after
another, very rapid shots – just ‘pop pop pop pop’ and I knew every one of
those shots represented someone, that it was aimed at someone, that they
weren’t just random shots,” Willeford said.

A former NRA instructor,
Willeford decided to load his rifle while his daughter scouted the situation
outside. She told him that he saw a man in black tactical gear firing at the
church. So Willeford, without even putting on his shoes, grabbed his firearm
and ran across the street to the church to confront the shooter.

“I know I hit him,” Willeford said. “He got into his vehicle, and he
fired another couple rounds through his side window. When the window dropped, I
fired another round at him again.”

Although he shot the gunman, later
identified as 26-year-old Devin Kelley, he decided to flee the scene and speed
down the highway.

Willeford spotted his friend Johnnie
Langendorff in his pickup truck at a stop sign. He ran over and asked him for
help.

“That guy just shot up the Baptist church.
We need to stop him,”
Willeford told Johnnie.

“I was strictly just acting on what’s the
right thing to do,”
Langendorff told reporters earlier Monday, according to the Associated Press.

As they drove after the shooter the pair called 911 to give a description of
the assailant. Eventually, they caught up to Kelley’s truck, who had run into a
road sign and flipped his truck into a ditch.

Willeford cautiously exited his
truck and yelled, “get out of the truck, get out of the truck, but did not see any
movement”, he said. Police later arrived to the scene. Kelley opted to take
the cowards way out and committed suicide.

THE BOTTOM LINE:Willeford insists that he’s not a hero. “I
think my God, my Lord protected me and gave me the skills to do what needed to
be done,” he said.

When the dust had settled,
officials revealed that Kelley killed 26 people in the rampage, the largest
mass shooting in Texas history.

It’s too bad the church itself
was a GUN FREE ZONEor maybe so many wouldn’t have died. But it’s interesting what happens when at
least a neighbor obeys constitutional law and “keeps and bears arms.” I wonder when the State and Federal Governments
are going to begin obeying the law as well - and put a stop to all this defenseless
killing.

Did you know that all mass shootings
take place in GUN FREE ZONES?

Constitutional law requires that
we be an armed nation…It’s “Necessary for the security of a Free State.”
Read it for yourself and you too will see that the Government is in
violation of the law. “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary
to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
shall not be infringed.”

Well it’s been infringed my
friend. That’s why all the kids died at Sandy Hook. It too - was a GUN FREE ZONE.

So now go buy yourself a gun for
CHRISTMAS. Remember what Jesus said"But
now," he said, "take your money and a
traveler's bag. And if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one!”Luke 22:36.

And I’ say…”if you have a Bible look it up!” I didn’t make that up either…

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and
fight for truth and freedom. If you
would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me
at writedeandrae@hotmail.com

-
de Andréa

Please
pass on this article to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for your friends to
hear the truth.

Saturday, December 23, 2017

“Better to write for
yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly(1903 - 1974)

The
Unconstitutional BLM And the Tyranny of the Courts

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for

‘THE
BOTTOM LINE’

Posted December 23, 2017

A Federal court in
Nevada recently declared a mistrial in the Cliven Bundy Case. Did you read that
right? Not a dismissal but a mistrial! In other words the ‘Federal Kangaroo
Courts’ can try this trumped-up illegal case again! They likely won’t…but…

Since from nearly
the beginning of the 21 Century one of the many totally Illegal and
unconstitutional Federal Departments, called the Bureau of Land Management
(BLM) which also illegally has its own military, has attacked harassed and eventually incarcerated
members of the Nevada Bundy family just because they could.

The false
philosophy here - is that Government Officials seem to believe that the U.S.
Government is a separate ‘Jackbooted Gestapo Entity’ from the People. When in fact the ‘People’ are’ the
Government. The misguided philosophy of
the BLM is that they, and they alone, own more than 28 percent of the land in
the United States, not the ‘People’.

Note the map below:

The red is what the
BLM claims sovereign authority over. The truth is that they illegally stole most
of it from the people and the states. Take note that the earlier states in the east
and Midwest are only sparsely owned by the Federal Government, mostly because
as Clause
17 of Article I, Section 8 states it can only own land needed to run the
government. And Article
IV sec. 3 clearly states that it cannot own land within the borders of the many
states, except what Article I Section allows. This is why they own very little
of the eastern and Midwestern states. But as time passed and the country grew west,
the Government evolved into a power land grabbing entity.

Although the BLM
wasn’t created until 1946 by combining two
existing agencies: the General Land Office and the Grazing Service, the agency now illegally possess and manages the federal government's nearly
700 million acres of state land. The
Federal government began acquiring land from Spain France and other countries
as early as the 1780’s. And except for
the Homestead Act of 1862 (that is by the way still in effect but nearly
impossible to take advantage of) and the few sales of land to individuals by
the government, and as more and more of the acquired Territory in the West
became states the Federal Government illegally retained authority over much,
and is some cases, most of the land mass.

Note: That white spot at the most southern tip of Nevada…that’s Bundy Land.
And as you can see, except for a little
land along Interstate 80 in the north, nearly the entire state of Nevada is stolen
land by the government B-L-M military!

So, what is the law, first regarding the Federal Government
owning land and second, creating new unconstitutional departments and arbitrarily
expanding government power?

First Let us go to Article 1 sec. 8 clause 17 of the U.S.
Constitution which states:

“To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such
District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular
States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of
the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by
the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the
Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful
Buildings;”

Clause 17 of Article I, Section 8 deals with the issue that the Constitutional
Framers had agreed that the new nation’s capital should be located in a
district that was independent of any particular state government and subject
only to federal control. Thus the plan was to create a federal district no more
than ten miles square from land ceded by one or more states to house the U.S.
national capital, which was accomplished when the Compromise of 1790
ended with agreement to form the District of Columbia from landed ceded by
Maryland and Virginia. The national capital was temporarily relocated from New
York to Philadelphia while construction began on homes for the president and
Congress, and in 1800 the United States’ capital was moved again (for the final
time) to Washington, D.C., in December 1800.

“Clause 17” allows Congress to exercise exclusive control over that federal
district, and over any land and structures that are deemed necessary for
carrying on the business of the Federal Government (such as forts, arsenals, and post offices).

Then let’s go to article IV sec.
3 of the Constitution which states:

“The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or ‘*other Property’ belonging
to the United States ...”

This section of the Constitution
grants Congress the power to make needful rules and regulations while the land
is still a Territory (capital T) and grants Congress the power to dispose of
the land. It does not grant unto congress the power to retain
the land, only
to dispose of it. This means that the federal government does not
and cannot OWN land except what is a Territory and what is stated in (Article 1
Section 8 Clause 17.) They can make the rules while it is a Territory, but they
only have the obligation, duty and authority to dispose of it.In other
words, the people OWN the land and have charged the Federal government to be
administrators until
it can be disposed of.

*“The other property” mentionedin Article IV sec. 3 refers
to the property in Article 1 sec. 8 clause 17
which is the property in Washington DC and other property needed to run the
government such as federal buildings, arsenals, military bases, etc.

So how does Congress dispose of Territorial land? It can and has been done in several ways:
they can sell it, they can give it away (such as they did with the Homestead Act),
but the ultimate tool of disposal however, is Statehood. The land is no longer a Territory… By
accepting a State into the Union, Congress is
disposing (relinquishing its rights) of the land/Territory to the people of
that particular State.At the moment
of Statehood, The Federal Government no longer has the constituted authority to
administrate the land or resources within the borders of that State. The people of that state now have all authority over the land
in that state.

This is U.S. Constitutional Law ‘my
friend’ moreover it has evolved, been ignored and/or manipulated to suit those
in power nearly since its inception.
This is what the Oregon and the Nevada Bundy standoff was really about
my friend. It wasn’t about cattle, tortoises, unpaid rent or the environment,
it was about government tyranny plain and simple. Only the one who owns the land can rent it out
or have any kind of authority over it, and that is the people or the state in
which the land is located.

Then there is the little issue of illegal departments and powers of the
Federal government such as in this case the BLM that expanded the power of the
Department of the Interior and evolved into a Gestapo Military. There are over
7000 such unconstitutional departments now in the Federal Government.

I refer you to the 10th Amendment:

“The
powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited
by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

The 10th Amendment the
most violated amendment of all of the Bill of Rights, expresses the principle
of federalismand states' rights, which strictly supports the entire plan of the
original Constitution for the United States of America, by stating that the federal governmentpossesses only those powers delegated to it by the
United States Constitution. All remaining powers are reserved for the states or
the people.

THE BOTTOM LINE:Again I Challenge anyone to find in the U.S.
Constitution that the Federal Government has the power to establish a
department that is essentially a corporate entity that owns and controls land
and mineral rights in some cases up to 80 percent of state land.

If you want to read the details
of the latest development and a little background in the Bundy V.s. the BLM
case, in the ‘OREGONIAN’ you can click on this.

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight
for truth and freedom. If you would like
to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com

-
de Andréa

Please
pass on this article to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for your friends to
hear the truth.