Monthly Archives: March 2017

Updated: July 16th 2017

Throughout the offseason, I will be preparing a collection of articles that will focus on free agents and trade candidates. The articles will discuss the player in question, and what the move does to their value, as well as what their landing spot means for their new and old teams.

Brandin Cooks – WR, New England Patriots

The talk so far of free agency didn’t come from a free agent but rather a trade that sent Brandin Cooks from the New Orleans Saints to the New England Patriots. Many people have been touting this as the greatest move the Pats have made since acquiring Randy Moss in 2007. Fantasy fanatics need little reminder of the 23 touchdowns Moss put up in his first year with the team. But should owners expect the same level of production from Cooks in 2017 and beyond?

Those who speak against Cooks have quickly pointed out that he played eight of his games in the dome with New Orleans along with three more games in Tampa, Charlotte, and Atlanta each of the last three seasons. The AFC East, save for sunny Miami, is not a forgiving environment to play in weather wise and people question how Cooks’ blazing speed will translate into the cold and snowy region of Foxborough. Even Michael Fabiano posted a tweet showcasing the split between Cooks’ games indoors and out over the last two seasons.

This is a classic case of throwing out a fact without much context. Yes, the points per game are lower but there’s no understanding as to who the opponents were or who Cooks was matched up against. Cooks actually average more catches outdoors based on this infographic. Needless to say, people are asking the wrong questions about what Cooks means to the Patriots.

So what does Cooks mean to Patriot players?

The Patriots needed a player who could stretch the defense on the outside away from Edelman in the slot and running backs out of the backfield. Having said that I don’t see him being a DeSean Jackson, lid popping, type receiver in the scheme on a frequent basis. Go routes will always be a part of his route tree but I see Josh McDaniels moving him around more to be the intermediate/crossing route receiver; especially on 2nd and mid or 3rd and short downs to pull the safeties away from the middle of the field opening up the underneath for other receivers and backs. Other than Gronk this definitely deflates the number of targets available for other pass catchers. I don’t see Edelman being forgotten this year and he should still put up low WR2/high WR3 points but he could be let go after this season similar to his predecessor Wes Welker. The big hit goes to Malcolm Mitchell owners who are disappointed that they didn’t get a chance to see what he could produce in his second year. Barring a long injury next season to one of the other receivers it will be hard to have Mitchell be anything more than a bye week/flex play.

So what is Cooks’ value?

As painful as it would sound based on what he produced for fantasy purposes last year I see Cooks being in 2017 a slightly better upgrade at what Hogan was in 2016, but with 4.3 speed. The Patriots and specifically Bill Belichick don’t care about your fantasy teams and will use whatever players they think will help them one game at a time. What that means is that there will be games where Cooks will push double digit catch and have multiple touchdowns and then he will be less than stellar for the next two games. The one difference that will save Cooks owners will be that based on the capital the Patriots invested in him his floor will be higher than Hogan’s was on a week-to-week basis with the hope that he replaces Edelman after 2017. If he’s on a decent contract for multiple seasons and is available for a mid-1st or a package for lower picks and players he would be an interesting buy.

So what does it mean for Saints players?

One person leaves so that means more food at the buffet for the rest right? Not exactly. While Cooks did account for 117 targets last season Michael Thomas was actually targeted more with 121 (even Willie Snead got 104). While it is possible that Thomas pushes into the Mike Evans, Odell Beckham and Antonio Brown range of 180 targets it’s more likely that Thomas has a mild increase in 2017 while a new receiver is integrated into the offense with 70-80 targets. Based on this expectation it is probably not worth trying to acquire Thomas who will be at his peak price right now. Instead, scribble in your auction journals to try and acquire Willie Snead on a savvy 2 or 3-year deal. He’s already an early sleeper to push WR2 numbers next season and should have a good couple of years left with Drew Brees. I was lucky to grab Snead in a few of my leagues last year on multi-year deals that would likely cost double this season. As well, keep an eye on any receiver that is brought in either late in free agency or through the draft. Drew Brees loves to spread the ball around and any day two or three drafted receivers that the Saints add could be fed the 70-80 targets previously mentioned. That would be tremendous opportunity value for a player that could be a 3rd round rookie pick this season.

Make sure to continue to read more Free Agency Expectancy articles throughout the offseason to be prepared for your summer Auctions. Have a player that you want me to evaluate? Send me a message on Twitter @naandrews19.

Updated: July 16th 2017

The NFL recently finished the first phase of free agency and with it came large contract dollars that make agents, and the players they represent, feel good about the deals that were doled out. And like other years, the initial contract numbers presented to the public largely distort the actual contract implications. This article takes a more in-depth look into a few selected multi-year contracts of offensive players, examining short and long term NFL impacts plus consequences for RSO leagues.

Mike Glennon, QB, Chicago Bears

Published Contract: 3 years / $45 Million, $18.5M guaranteed

Real Contract: 1 year with two team option years

What it means: The contract likely paid Glennon more than was warranted or necessary for his services. However, the Bears commit to the former Buccaneer for only one year with just $4.5 million owed after 2017. Chicago’s overpay is tempered by cheap contract years in 2017 ($16M) and 2018 ($15M) with cap hits which project toward the low end of the spectrum for non-rookie deal starting quarterbacks if Glennon proves to be a good quarterback for the Bears. The one-year commitment also does not prevent the Bears using a high draft pick on a quarterback this season.

RSO league consequences: You should only consider Glennon useful in 2QB/Superflex leagues as a low-end starter or bye week/injury reserve. There is very little upside on a Chicago team with lots of unknowns at receiver, who just lost its top receiving threat, Alshon Jeffery, to the Eagles, and figures to be run-heavy in the near future led by a strong offensive line and rookie-sensation Jordan Howard. Glennon is not a player I would invest in for the long haul at the moment. We will have more information about the Chicago’s future quarterback plan following the NFL draft.

Tyrod Taylor, QB, Buffalo Bills

Published Contract: 2 years / $30.5 Million, $15.5M guaranteed

Real Contract: 1 year with one team option year

What it means: Taylor remains in Buffalo on another team-friendly contract. This contract and teams’ lack of interest in Colin Kaepernick (although there are other issues at play for Kaepernick) says a lot about the market for “running” quarterbacks with limited passing skills. This situation could go in a lot of directions in 2018 depending on how he meshes with the new coaching staff. The contract contains $8.6M in dead cap after 2017 (of which $5.6M is locked in through 3 voided years at the end of contract). Taylor’s $18M cap hit is not outrageous if he is retained in 2018.

RSO league consequences: Taylor is a great one year option for those looking to go cheaper at quarterback. He does not have the passing skills to challenge the top performers but his rushing abilities give him a nice weekly floor which resulted in QB1 numbers on a PPG basis for 2015 and 2016. Those running skills also help open lanes on the ground for LeSean McCoy and the rest of the Bills rushing attack. The lack of pocket passing traits, on the other hand, severely limits Buffalo receivers’ upside including Sammy Watkins. While I like Taylor in 2017, I am not looking for a longer contract. There was not much of a market for Taylor during pre-free agency talks which resulting in Taylor taking a reduced contract to stay in Buffalo. The Bills have now passed on the chance to commit to Taylor twice. If teams will not commit, neither should you.

DeSean Jackson, WR, Tampa Bay Bucaneers

Published Contract: 3 years / $33.5 Million, $18.5M guaranteed

Real Contract: 2 years with one team option year

What it means: Jackson solves massive offensive speed issues in the receiver group for Tampa Bay. He can help a young Jameis Winston who enjoys throwing the football deep but has not been particularly effective at it. Jackson creates far more separation than other receivers Winston throws to however. The Bucs could conceivably cut Jackson in year two, but that option is highly unlikely with only $3.5 Million out of $11M not guaranteed and probably occurs only in the case of catastrophic injury or other major issue. This is one of my favorite deals so far in free agency filling a major team need with reasonable contract terms.

RSO league consequences: Jackson remains a high-volatile WR3 in Tampa Bay, although one with higher upside than many receivers in this range. Tampa Bay’s passing targets concentrated heavily on Mike Evans in 2016. The next two targets, Cameron Brate and Adam Humphries, together totaled fewer targets than Evans alone. With only Brate and Humphries challenging for secondary targets to Evans, Jackson could easily see more targets than in his time in Washington. I am very comfortable giving Jackson a 2 or 3 year deal as his weekly volatility generally results in cheaper RSO contracts.

Robert Woods, WR, Los Angeles Rams

Published Contract: 5 years / $34 Million, $15M guaranteed

Real Contract: 1 year with four team option years

What it means: This contract is a great example of how misleading the generic contract terms can be. The Rams are only locked in for the first season of the five year contract. Even the guarantees are not guaranteed. $8M of the $15M in guarantees lock in for injury only. Woods will be a year to year rental for Los Angeles.

RSO league consequences: Nothing to see here. Woods theoretically slots in as a starting receiver for Sean McVay’s offense. This is a Rams team that likely adds major receiving weapons over the next couple of years, however. Woods could garner enough targets in 2017 to be useful in deeper leagues but should not be considered as more than a depth player on a one year contract.

Latavius Murray, RB, Minnesota Vikings

Published Contract: 3 years / $15 Million, $8.55M guaranteed

Real Contract: 1 year with two team option years

What it means: Oh how the mighty have fallen. The fact that this is the premier contract given to a running back in free agency says all you need to know about the running back market. Former heavyweights at the position including Adrian Peterson, Jamaal Charles, and Eddie Lacy have gathered only marginal interest (Editor’s Note: Lacy signed a 1-year deal with Seattle that guaranties him $2.865M and could earn him up to $5.55M depending on his performance and his weight). A number of factors including a deep running back draft class plus analytics research detailing the minimal effect of the run game generally and the running back specifically have suppressed the demand for running backs. Only $2.7M of Murray’s contract is fully guaranteed. The cap number balloons from a small sub-$3M number in 2017 to well over $6M in 2018 with only $1.2M in dead money left. The contract is tailor-made for Murray’s release or contract restructure in 2018.

RSO league consequences: Murray moves in as the top back in Minnesota, splitting time with incumbent Jerick McKinnon. This is likely more of a timeshare rather than players with separate, strict roles in the offense. McKinnon is competent catching flares and screens out of the backfield but is not a particularly good receiver or route runner. Murray is better in pass protection and likely takes most goal line work based on Minnesota’s previous use of the departed Matt Asiata. The offensive line was a mess in 2016, but Minnesota spent a lot of money shoring up the position in free agency. The Vikings are also prime candidates to add offensive line talent in the draft. Minnesota could also look at running back in the draft. Overall, consider Murray a low upside borderline RB2/3 in RSO leagues. Murray has not demonstrated special talent so far in the league and given his NFL contract, I would not sign Murray to more than a 1-year RSO contract.

Bio: Bernard Faller has degrees in engineering and economics. He currently lives in Las Vegas and enjoys athletics, poker, and fantasy football in his free time. Send your questions and comments (both good and bad) on Twitter @BernardFaller1.

Connect with RSO

Updated: July 23rd 2017

Here it is folks, the much anticipated rookie mock draft you’ve been waiting for. Let’s put a few things in context before we move on… Remember that it’s still March and players are liable to get hurt (or healthy) and that the value of the below players will inevitably shift once we know who they are drafted by. Also, keep in mind that this is how I would draft for a “neutral” RSO team – your team’s positional needs and salary cap situation should greatly influence your own thinking. For example, if you lucked into David Johnson two years ago but still finished last and grabbed Zeke in 2016, maybe Fournette isn’t the way to go at 1.01. For the purposes of a narrative structure, I have grouped some of the players into similar talking points, their grouping is not necessarily reflective of a “tier” or anything else.

1.03 – Joe Mixon, RB, Oklahoma

1.04 – Mike Williams, WR, Clemson

1.05 – Dalvin Cook, RB, Florida State

As sure as I am about Fournette and Davis not falling, these three are all neck and neck for me and will continue to fluctuate. I did not include Mixon in my RB Film Study piece and am regretting it now. Putting Mixon at 1.03 is a crapshoot but because he has the widest range of potential outcomes is exactly why I put him in that spot. Because of his off the field issues, Mixon will not be drafted very high so there is a better chance that he lands on a good team who decides they are willing to take the chance. There’s also a non-zero chance he isn’t drafted at all. Who knows. If it weren’t for his baggage, I don’t think anybody would question him this high. As I discussed in my WR Film Study piece, Williams’ tape just does not impress me and I am worried about his 2015 neck injury. Cook’s stock has fallen after his brutal combine performance despite his spectacular tape.

1.06 – Christian McCaffery, RB, Stanford

1.07 – John Ross, WR, Washington

1.08 – Alvin Kamara, RB, Tennessee

1.09 – JuJu Smith-Schuster, WR, USC

These four just miss out on being considered at the top of the draft. I think McCaffery’s immediate impact in the NFL will be as a third down back whose pass protection will keep him on the field unlike many rookie RBs; I don’t think he has enough Year One upside to draft any higher though. Ross is obviously a burner but he has a long injury history and his value will heavily rely on who drafts him. Kamara is a little under sized (5’10” and 214lb, very similar to Cook) and only had 210 career carries at Tennessee (a whopping fourteen games with single digit carries; for comparison McCaffery had 253 carries in 2016 alone). Kamara did show out at the Combine in the vertical and broad jumps, unlike Cook, and could ultimately move up this list. Smith-Schuster put up back-to-back 10 TD seasons at USC but is about 2 inches shorter than he should be to garner more draft attention. Smith-Schuster compares well to DeAndre Hopkins at the 2013 Combine so while I’m cautious, I have some hope.

1.10 – OJ Howard, TE, Alabama

2.01 – Evan Engram, TE, Ole Miss

2.02 – David Njoku, TE, Miami

In one of my early offseason articles, I mentioned that 2017 could be the year of the running back in the NFL Draft. 2017 very well may go down as the year of the tight end in your RSO draft. I grouped these three TEs here right at end of the 1st, start of the 2nd because honestly I don’t know where else to put them. It’s hard to imagine three TEs being drafted by the time you hit 2.02 but these guys could arguably make an earlier impact for your RSO team than Kamara or Smith-Schuster. I’m not quite ready to put them above those two though since they play more in-demand positions. Engram ran a faster 40 yard dash than both Corey Davis and Mike Williams while Howard beat out Smith-Schuster. Both Engram and Howard beat out Curtis Samuel in the 3 cone drill and the shuttle even though he he’s been lauded as a a versatile athlete by many. Njoku does not quite measure up to Howard’s and Engram’s athleticism, although he was a state champion high jumper in high school, but the unknown about him (only 64 career receptions, only started playing football in middle school) has scouts salivating about his potential.

2.03 – Samaje Perine, RB, Oklahoma

2.04 – D’Onta Foreman, RB, Texas

2.05 – Curtis Samuel, RB/WR, Ohio State

Perine and Foreman are both two big backs (both weigh 233lb, Perine is 5’11” while Foreman is 6’0″). The biggest differnece between the two comes down to experience for me. Foreman bounded into the spotlight in 2016 with a 323 carry, 2,028 yards and 15 TD season (enough yards to be 23rd on the all-time single season list) but he was only a contributor in 2015. Perine on the other hand, was a three year starter with three 1,000 yard seasons and 51 total TDs in his career. I thought it was interesting too that Perine so handily outperformed Foreman in the bench press at the Combine, 30 reps to 18, despite their similar size. Ultimately, I’ll go with Perine and what I deem to be a surer thing. To highlight the trouble with Curtis Samuel, I have grouped him here with Foreman and Perine even though that is a horrible fit for his skill set. Samuel could run into the same issue in the NFL where his versatility could end up being his downfall. Samuel totaled 172 carries and 107 receptions in his Buckeye career. He is the same height as McCaffery and Ross and falls between the two weight-wise which feels about right. Ultimately his speed (4.31 40-yard dash) will make him desirable but I worry he will struggle to fit into every offense and could become a gadget player.

2.06 – Zay Jones, WR, East Carolina

2.07 – Malachi Dupre, WR, LSU

2.08 – KD Cannon, WR, Baylor

I’m torn on how to sort these three WRs but ended up going for the size and production of Zay Jones despite playing at a lesser school in East Carolina. I also considered Carlos Henderson and Dede Westbrook but decided to leave them off. Jones came in at 6’2″ and 201lb at the Combine and ran a solid 4.45 40-yard dash. His production jumps off the page more than anything else though… 158 receptions, 1,746 yards and 8 TDs in 2016. That wasn’t a one-time thing either – he totaled 399 receptions, 4,279 yards and 23 TDs in a four year career. Much like Perine feels like a sure thing, so does Jones at this point in your rookie draft. Dupre is of a similar size but just did not produce at LSU, likely due to ongoing quarterback issues. Dupre has thirteen career games with 1 or 2 receptions while Cannon and Jones have twelve combined, most of which came in their freshman seasons. Meanwhile, Cannon has the production, Baylor is a high volume air raid offense, but lacks size. Cannon isn’t quite the same athlete as Corey Coleman who came out of this same offense last year but he’s close enough to warrant a chance.

2.09 – Wayne Gallman, RB, Clemson

2.10 – Pat Mahomes, QB, Texas Tech

We’ve reached the point in the mock draft where I will call a few “shots.” I fell in love with Gallman while I did research for my championship game preview back in January and I wish he was getting more love. He had a bad Combine but I’m going to go against all logic and still hold out hope. Gallman is a slasher who would be a great fit for a zone read scheme in the NFL. His production was off the charts at Clemson despite having star QB Deshaun Watson hogging the spotlight (675 carries, 3,475 yards, 36 total TDs in three seasons as the primary running back). I’m not ready to write Gallman off yet and want to be able to claim I was right when he inevitably blossoms on the right NFL team. Similarly for Mahomes, I am doubling down on my previous love. I don’t think he is the best QB coming out and he definitely won’t be the highest drafted but he’s the one I want on my RSO team provided I don’t need an immediate starter. I predict Mahomes will be nabbed late in the first round, either by a playoff team or a team trading back into the first because they want him. He needs help with his footwork and making full field reads but he has great arm strength and athleticism. When watching tape, I saw him catch defenses making late substitutions for free plays (one of which turned into a touchdown), a la Aaron Rodgers. College quarterbacks just don’t do that. If I was an NFL GM, and I’m not so take all my suggestions with a big grain of salt, I would be getting Mahomes for my team.

Updated: July 23rd 2017

I’ve wavered on my opinion of the top WRs in this class since January when we saw Corey Davis, John Ross and Mike Williams playing in their post New Year bowl games. In fact, I ended up putting Ross ahead of Williams halfway through writing this piece but decided to flip-flop them again before publishing. I’m not sure if the fact that the three of them played on very good teams (combined 39-4 in 2016) is correlation or causation but the reality is that they will each be drafted in the first round and will be difference makers in 2017. It would be cliche to say that you can’t go wrong with any of them, so I won’t, but I will definitely revisit their order after the draft based on the fit with their NFL team because that will help provide some separation between them.

Corey Davis, Western Michigan

The production put up by Corey Davis at Western Michigan is astounding. The counter-argument regarding his numbers is typically about the quality of his opponents. That’s fair, but also keep in mind he’s not having passes thrown to him by a future NFL quarterback like Deshaun Watson. In addition to his production, Davis has good size (6’3″ 209lb; same measurements as Devante Parker last year) and because of that, I’m not scared away by Davis’ “mid-major” resume.

I watched film of Davis playing against Buffalo and Wisconsin. Time and again throughout both games, I was impressed by his field awareness and how he turns that into perfect routes. Whether it is knowing exactly where the first down marker is or knowing when to drag a route versus turning up field. He’s very physical and uses his body well, which was highlighted by a 2nd Quarter touchdown against Wisconsin when he basically boxed the defender out and made the catch look easy. He did something similar against Buffalo where he ran a great route near the goal line which caused the defender to hold him as he cut towards the pylon, he fought through the hold and by sheer strength turned the play into a touchdown rather than an accepted penalty. In addition to his physicality, he has quick feet which help him after the catch – specifically two spin moves he pulled against Buffalo, one of which went for a score.

I think Davis himself would admit that he’s not very fast, but he looks slow coming off the line in the tape I watched. Probably for this reason, he often lines up in the slot where he can gain some momentum before making contact with the defender. He’s the target of the occasional quick or bubble screen and even some jet sweeps to get him in open space where he can try to make tacklers miss but his lack of elite speed prevents either from being a true weapon in the playbook. Davis was not called on often to block but when he did I would say he was below average, there was not a single time where I noted that he really helped a teammate gain extra yardage. Against Buffalo, Davis did have a number of drops but that could have been caused by the intermittent snow that fell early in that game.

Finally, let’s take a closer look at Davis’ aforementioned record-setting stats. He is 1st ALL-TIME in career receiving yards in the FBS. He is 2nd all-time in career receiving touchdowns. He is 4th all-time in career receptions. When compared to fellow rookie Mike Williams, Davis nearly doubles Williams in the main counting stats (Williams did miss all but one game in 2015, but I was still surprised to see such a difference). Corey Davis haters will point out that the top of those all-time stats are full of unrecognizable names but it’s still an impressive resume and if he performs well enough at his pro day (if he is healthy enough) it should cement his place atop my rankings.

Mike Williams, Clemson

The most important film you can watch of Mike Williams is of this play from 2015. That neck injury forced him to miss essentially the entire 2015 season. It was a scary injury that thankfully was not worse. If I was drafting for my NFL team, that would most definitely be on my mind as it is for my RSO team.

In my notes from the Clemson vs Ohio State semi-final game, I wrote “Mike Williams is a man. If he were 2 inches taller he would be a Top 3 pick in the NFL Draft.” I still agree with that sentiment, but he isn’t taller and after watching film I’ve learned to love Corey Davis more. Against Florida State, Williams faded into the background a bit, only catching 7 balls for 70 yards (he did catch a key 2pt conversion late). What stood out most against FSU wasn’t Williams’ size or ability to catch the ball, it was actually his blocking. On three occasions, one with Watson rushing and Gallman the other, Williams’ blocking on the edge allowed the team to get a first down and advance down the field. I was similarly nonplussed by Williams’ performance against Louisville even though he was the victim of a few bad throws from Watson. His best play against Louisville was a short catch where he fought back through the defender to catch the ball.

Like Davis, Williams has the physical size (6’4″ 218lb) to be a great NFL wide receiver, but after reviewing his combine results I am starting to question his athleticism. Williams’ vertical jump of 32.5″ was 30th best and his broad jump of 121″ was 24th best. I do have to admit that for his size, Williams ran a good 4.50 40-yard dash at his pro day.

Ultimately, I am too hesitant to take Williams ahead of Davis. At this point, I’d rather be the guy who misses on Williams but gets solid production from Davis than the guy who takes him despite the neck injury, some lackluster tape and concerns about his athleticism and is stuck with a bad contract.

John Ross, Washington

John Ross is fast, no doubt about it. My concern though is how does that fit into his NFL team’s offense. I’m not willing to bump Ross above Williams or Davis at this point because his best trait could easily be wasted if he is not drafted by a team/coach with a good track record who would be willing to utilize him properly. Imagine if Ross was on the Chiefs offense instead of Tyreek Hill last year. Hill is a former high school track athlete who showcased his speed on his way to a 12 TD rookie season. Now, think about the fact that Hill ran a 4.29 40-yard dash at his pro day (which is typically a more favorable environment than the Combine) while Ross ran a record 4.22 last week. That .07 may not sound like a lot but it is and it shows just how Ross could make the most explosive NFL players look pedestrian.

What makes Ross’ speed more impressive is that he is doing it after knee injuries to both knees. Like Williams, he missed the entire 2015 season. Ross is also now dealing with a shoulder injury. If I’m being fair, I have to knock Ross significantly for his injury history like I did for Williams.

It should come as no surprise given his raw speed, but Ross has great release off the line of scrimmage. He easily gets past defenders and can then accelerate downfield. Against Rutgers, he had two of these plays in the 1st Quarter that resulted in touchdowns (38 and 50 yards) and he also had one in the 3rd Quarter against USC (70 yards). Once he got past the defender at the line of scrimmage there was really nothing the defense could do. Even with safety help, Ross is at full speed in an instant and by the time the safety flips his hips and pursues it is too late. Ross did not run as many screens as I expected, but I do imagine this being a bigger part of his game in the NFL where corners will be bigger and more adept at keeping him in front of them. Not surprisingly, Ross did not block much; his contribution to the running game was often running a pattern in the opposite direction of the play to draw defensive attention. He did add a kick return touchdown against Rutgers (and had 4 on his career) which could help Ross contribute right away on whatever team drafts him.

Honestly, I was expecting Ross to be smaller than what I saw when I started watching film. I had not seen much of him (yeah, yeah East Coast Bias) prior to my research and based off what I had heard on talk radio I assumed he was in the 5’8″ or 5’9″ range. He measured in at 5’11” 188lb at the combine which puts him in the same vein as guys like Odell Beckham, Markus Wheaton and Corey Coleman; none would be considered tall receivers but they aren’t Dri Archer which is more like what I was expecting. That bodes well for his ability to stick as a featured receiver in the league.

**Note: When watching film for a player, I typically pick two games at random to watch. I do not necessarily want to watch games where they did very well or very poorly as that may not be a great illustration of their true ability. If possible, when comparing players at the same position I also like to watch film against common opponents. Full disclosure, I am not watching film of every single game any player plays, instead I am looking for a representative sample. When researching college players I use a number of resources, I would recommend bookmarking the below sites…

Robert F. Cowper is a freelance writer who lives in New Jersey. Robert works as a recreation professional, specializing in youth sports, when he isn’t acting as commissioner for his many fantasy sports leagues.

Connect with RSO

Updated: July 23rd 2017

We take a look at some of the top offensive skill position rookies this week following the NFL combine. The article focuses on how individuals and position groups as a whole performed relative to perceptions prior to the combine and what that could mean for draft status.

Running Backs

PLAYER

HGT

WGT

ARMS

HANDS

40

225

VJ

BJ

20S

60S

3C

Cook, Dalvin

5′-10″

210

32.375

9.25

4.49

22

30.5

9′-8″

4.53

DNP

7.27

Foreman, D’Onta

6′-0″

233

31.375

10.125

DNP

18

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

Fournette, Leonard

6′-0″

240

31.625

9.25

4.51

DNP

28.5

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

Hunt, Kareem

5′-11″

216

31.375

9.625

4.62

18

36.5

9′-11″

DNP

DNP

DNP

Kamara, Alvin

5′-10″

214

32.75

9.25

4.56

15

39.5

10′-11″

DNP

DNP

DNP

Mccaffrey, Christian

5′-11″

202

30

9

4.48

10

37.5

10′-1″

4.22

11.03

6.57

Perine, Samaje

5′-11″

233

30.375

10

4.65

30

33

9′-8″

4.37

11.71

7.26

Mixon, Joe *

6′-1″

228

10.25

4.50

21

35

9′-10″

4.25

7.00

Table 1: Selected Running Back Performances from 2017 Combine

* Pro Day Results

Leonard Fournette confirmed his freakish size-speed status running the forty yard dash in 4.51s at 240lbs. Other consensus top pick, Dalvin Cook, disappointed in most drills compared to pre-combine expectations spotlighted by agility and explosion drills near the bottom of the class. Players with this type of athletic profile rarely get drafted early and do not often succeed at the NFL level. It was the type of performance that will have evaluators reviewing film and watching his pro day carefully. Christian McCaffrey shined throughout the combine process highlighted by exceptional agility marks and ultra-smooth receiving drills. The question remains what fit the Stanford Cardinal will play at the NFL level. McCaffrey’s traits profile more as a slot receiver but his diverse skill-set should ensure a significant role wherever he lands. Joe Mixon’s off the field issues are well documented but he has the least on-field questions of any running back in this class. The Sooner possesses prototypical size, breakaway speed, strong athleticism, and superb receiving skills.

Most analysts predicted the running back group as the strength of the 2017 rookie class coming into the season. We seem to have more questions than answers after an underwhelming combine for the group. There are few complete top end prospects without question marks and no one from the lower tier of backs really emerged from the combine as someone challenging the top-tier prospects. The group is very deep with individuals of varying skills who should contribute to NFL teams immediately.

Wide Receivers

PLAYER

HGT

WGT

ARMS

HANDS

40

225

VJ

BJ

20S

60S

3C

Davis, Corey

6′-3″

209

33

9.125

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

Dupre, Malachi

6′-3″

196

31.5

9

4.52

11

39.5

11′-3″

4.26

11.88

7.19

Jones, Zay

6′-2″

201

32.5

9

4.45

15

36.5

11′-1″

4.01

11.17

6.79

Kupp, Cooper

6′-2″

204

31.5

9.5

4.62

DNP

31

9′-8″

4.08

DNP

6.75

Ross, John

5′-11″

188

31.5

8.75

4.22

DNP

37

11′-1″

DNP

DNP

DNP

Samuel, Curtis

5′-11″

196

31.25

9.5

4.31

18

37

9′-11″

4.33

DNP

7.09

Smith-Schuster, Juju

6′-1″

215

32.875

10.5

4.54

15

32.5

10′-0″

DNP

DNP

DNP

Williams, Mike

6′-4″

218

33.375

9.375

DNP

15

32.5

10′-1″

DNP

DNP

DNP

Table 2: Selected Wide Receiver Performances from 2017 Combine

Two top receivers, Corey Davis and Mike Williams, provided very little information at the combine. Davis did not perform due to an injury and Williams did not perform in any running drills. John Ross and Curtis Samuel both blazed incredible forty times highlighted by Ross’ combine record-setting performance. These are completely different players, however. Ross will be utilized primarily as a lid-lifting deep threat whereas Samuel is more of a do-it-all player in the mold of Tyreek Hill and Percy Harvin with value in the receiving, rushing, and return game. Zay Jones turned in one of the more impressive all-around performances of any receiver, excelling across the board in every drill.

This class is shallow at the top of with very few players possessing the ideal size and athleticism of traditional high end receiving options from previous years. This group is in no way without talent, however. The combine brought far more depth into view than many realized coming into the combine and should provide a large number of NFL contributors. Many small school receivers including Jones, Taywan Taylor, and Carlos Henderson displayed NFL-caliber athleticism confirming their college production was more than just scheme-based against inferior competition.

Tight Ends

PLAYER

HGT

WGT

ARMS

HANDS

40

225

VJ

BJ

20S

60S

3C

Butt, Jake

6′-6″

246

32

10

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

DNP

Engram, Evan

6′-3″

234

33.5

10

4.42

19

36

10′-5″

4.23

DNP

6.92

Hodges, Bucky

6′-6″

257

32.5

10.125

4.57

18

39

11′-2″

4.45

12.08

DNP

Howard, O.J.

6′-6″

251

33.75

10

4.51

22

30

10′-1″

4.16

11.46

6.85

Leggett, Jordan

6′-6″

258

33.5

10.375

DNP

18

33

9′-6″

4.33

12.06

7.12

Njoku, David

6′-4″

246

35.25

10

4.64

21

37.5

11′-1″

4.34

DNP

6.97

Table 3: Selected Tight End Performances from 2017 Combine

O.J. Howard cemented his place among the top tight end prospects. He possesses NFL size, great speed (he matched Leonard Fournette’s forty-time weighing 11 more lbs), and he scored highest among tight ends in agility drills. Evan Engram produced a workout which would make most wide receivers jealous highlighted by a jaw-dropping 4.42 forty time. Engram is the premier split tight end in this class and a matchup nightmare with comparisons to Washington star Jordan Reed common. David Njoku was considered the best raw athlete among tight ends pre-combine and his performance impressed. The former youth high jump champion from Miami excelled in explosion and agility drills. Only 20 years old, Njoku has room to grow both physically and learning the position. Bucky Hodges possibly raised his status more than any tight end with a great all around performance. He routinely beat college defenders on jump balls and that explosiveness was demonstrated at the combine with tremendous best-in-position numbers in the vertical and broad jumps.

Overall, the combine boosted the tight end position to extraordinary heights. Already considered one of the strengths of the rookie class, many now think the position group is among the best in recent memory. While the top tier of prospects certainly excited, there are intriguing prospects littered throughout the class. 6’-7” 278 lb behemoth Adam Shaheen from Division II Ashland played basketball in college and displays rare receiving skills for someone of his size. Another example from a small school athlete, Gerald Everett out of South Alabama displayed dynamic hybrid tight end/ wide receiver skills throughout the year and at the combine.

Quarterbacks

PLAYER

HGT

WGT

ARMS

HANDS

40

225

VJ

BJ

20S

60S

3C

Kizer, Deshone

6′-4″

233

33.125

9.875

4.83

30.5

8”11″

4.53

DNP

7.4

Mahomes, Patrick

6′-2″

225

33.25

9.25

4.8

30

9′-6″

4.08

DNP

6.88

Trubisky, Mitchell

6′-2″

222

32

9.5

4.67

27.5

9′-8″

4.25

DNP

6.87

Watson, Deshaun

6′-2″

221

33

9.75

4.66

32.5

9′-11″

4.31

DNP

6.95

Table 4: Selected Quarterback Performances from 2017 Combine

I questioned myself about adding athletic results for quarterbacks from the combine. The information provides limited useful data concerning quarterback evaluation except for those QBs who rely on rushing as a major component of their value (think Michael Vick and Tyrod Taylor). The combine results tended to reinforce much of what was already known about the prospects. Deshone Kizer checks the physical boxes for a limited-mobility, prototypical-sized quarterback while Patrick Mahomes, Mitchell Trubisky, and Deshaun Watson displayed very good agility in a somewhat undersized frame. The velocity data featured Mahomes’ (60 MPH) big arm with Kizer (56) and Trubisky (55) displaying solid NFL speed. Watson’s (49) velocity is at the very low end ever recorded at the combine and the results of similarly measured prospects do not provide much hope for Watson at the NFL level. Velocity is certainly not the primary trait concerning quarterback success but the lack of velocity will require a degree of decision-making, anticipation, and accuracy which has, at best, been inconsistent in Watson’s college career.

Overall, the combine did not really change the perception of the quarterback class. This is not a good year for NFL teams in need of a franchise quarterback. In addition to Watson’s issues; Kizer (accuracy), Mahomes (mechanics, decision-making), and Trubisky (experience) possess at least one major red flag that makes each more of a project than an NFL player ready to lead a franchise.

Overview

2017 is a far deeper class for offensive skill position players when compared with the 2016 class. Just three rookie running backs from 2016 received 150 touches and only 2 wide receivers garnered 100 targets. Do not expect two rookies to lead the league in rushing again or any wide receiver to see the kind of production of the Saints Michael Thomas, but the talent is available in 2017 to double the number of rookies with the afore-mentioned volume numbers. This class also contains the tight end talent to impact games in a way we rarely see from rookies at the position.

Bio: Bernard Faller has degrees in engineering and economics. He currently lives in Las Vegas and enjoys athletics, poker, and fantasy football in his free time. Send your questions and comments (both good and bad) on Twitter @BernardFaller1.

Connect with RSO

Updated: July 23rd 2017

Last week in this space, I reviewed film on the top quarterback prospects of the 2017 class and shared my notes with you. Today, we are going to look at the top three RBs – all of which are likely to be drafted in the 1st Round. In my first batch of mock draft analysis, I supposed that we might even see a fourth RB taken in the 1st Round – Joe Mixon and Wayne Gallman will have to wait for their film review but keep them on the radar.

Leonard Fournette, LSU

Before the combine, I only came across one mock draft with Dalvin Cook placed above Fournette. I’m not sure if that was a publicity stunt or a true belief at the time but it seems to be the vogue opinion now. I’m not there yet, but it is getting very close the more tape I watch. I decided to cherry pick the film I watched of Fournette because I wanted to see him against good competition. I chose to watch him play against Wisconsin (#4 rushing defense in the nation) and against Ole Miss (#22 and one of only four teams to give up single digit rushing TDs, 3 of which came from Fournette himself). In my opinion, Fournette reminds me of Adrian Peterson. He is big but still possesses enough breakaway speed if he hits the hole and can rip off some huge runs. On the downside though, he has a lot of carries for little to no gain that can keep the offense behind the chains. I think he is an underrated receiver out of the backfield (as evidenced by a beautiful wheel route catch he made against Wisconsin). He is also decent in pass protection which I was not expecting (in the two games he was actively engaged in pass protection 18 times by my count – he blew 4 of them that led to a sack/pressure/hurry).

Let’s look closer at his boom or bust potential. In those two games I watched, Fournette had 38 carries. On 16 of those 38 carries he earned 3 yards or less – that’s a whopping 42%. You may be able to find similar stats for any running back but it’s a bit worrisome for somebody who is likely going to be drafted in the Top 5 of the NFL Draft. At that rate, of 3 yards or less, he is putting his offense in 3rd and Medium or 3rd and Long situations too often. Throughout the film I watched, I was struck by how infrequently Fournette actually breaks tackles. On his three TD runs against Ole Miss he was essentially untouched for the combined 200+ yards of those plays. If he hits the hole just right, he has a combination of vision and speed to kill the defense but he does not often gain extra yards by breaking tackles. If I am going to harp on his bad runs, I do also need to give credit for his great runs. In addition to all of those short runs he also had runs of 19, 24, 30, 59, 76 and 78. Remember, that is just in two games against good defenses and ultimately that is why he will be the first RB drafted.

At the combine, Fournette weighed in as the heaviest RB at 240lb (the next heaviest was 233lb). It should not be surprising then that his 40 yard dash time was far from elite (4.51 seconds, 20th out of 31) and his vertical jump was horrendous (dead last). I hate to use the cliche, but he very well may be the guy who runs better in pads. Honestly, I was disappointed by his two drills and I would have liked to see him complete the others to have more points of comparison. I still have Fournette as RB1, but it is much closer than when I started my research two weeks ago.

Dalvin Cook, FSU

In my notes, I wrote that if Dalvin Cook showed up at the combine and weighed in at 215lb, he would automatically be my RB1 and overtake Leonard Fournette. His game tape is that explosive. He weighed in just short of my hope, at 210lb. My biggest knock on Cook right now is the diminutive size. In 2016, 29 RBs were measured at the combine and just 2 of them weighed in under 200lb. I have seen him listed anywhere between 202-213lb; for comparison, ESPN lists him at 213, CBS has him at 206 and DraftBreakdown has him at 202. I’m going to assume that he purposefully bulked up for the combine and I expect to see his playing weight fall closer to 202 than 213 come September. There’s one other thing that concerns me about Cook: his pass protection. In the two games I watched, he was in protection only a handful of times – most times he was out in the pattern. I think he has the desire to block, he ended up being the de factor lead blocker on QB scrambles a few times, but he doesn’t have the size.

When watching Cook play, it is clear immediately how explosive he is, especially his cuts. What is also evident is how patient he is, allowing his blocks to set up. He rarely takes the hole running straight, but that explosiveness and patience combine for some great runs. He dominated Florida in the first half but slowed in the second when they were trying to milk the clock. Against Michigan’s dominant defense he played well too. In my opinion, two plays against Michigan will best sum up Cook’s potential. In the 1st Quarter, there was a play where he set out wide as a WR, ran a simple go route, beat the defender and caught the ball over his shoulder for a gain of 45 yards. It was perfectly executed and could be the piece of tape that showcases his receiving skills to NFL scouts. Later in that game, in the 4th Quarter, Cook took a 3rd & 22 counter handoff, that was meant to set up better punting field position, and scampered 71 yards after breaking two tackles and turning on his breakaway speed. A last second push out of bounds was the only thing that kept him from the endzone. That play showed his patience as his blocks set up and then he exploded up field. Another positive that caught my eye was the varied sets that FSU’s offense ran. In the two games I watched, they ran multiple plays out of shotgun, pistol, single back and I formation – that’s good for his transition to the NFL.

If you look at the results of Cook’s combine performance, it throws a bit of cold water on the film. That’s why I still have him behind Fournette even though I was close to flip-flopping after watching the Michigan tape. Cook was near the worst RBs in the 3 cone drill, the shuttle drill, the broad jump and the vertical jump. His 40 yard dash time was good but not great: 4.49 which was tied for sixth fastest. The only place he really surprised me was his 22 bench press reps which was tied for third most.

Christian McCaffrey, Stanford

Christian McCaffrey is a better football player than he is a running back. That was the conclusion that I kept returning to while taking notes as I watched film and researched his game logs and career stats. He will be drafted by a good team in the late 1st Round and will slot in immediately as a prototypical third down back. He’s good at a lot of things, but not great at any. Ultimately, I think that will limit his RSO upside in Year One but at least it will get him on the field right away.

I watched McCaffrey play against UCLA and Washington and in both games, I was impressed with his pass protection skills. He routinely picked up the blitz and frequently chipped a rusher before going out for a pass. He is a great safety valve for his quarterback and because of his blocking ability, he is a great threat to catch screen passes; he can feign blocking without the defense thinking “yeah right, he’s not blocking” and then sneak out of the backfield. His middle name very well may be Versatile because in just two games, he took three snaps at WR and five at QB (in the Wildcat, no passes). He will likely be the only player I profile this offseason that has passing, rushing, receiving and returning TDs in his career (2/21/10/2 for the record).

McCaffrey is a very patient runner at the line of scrimmage. Honestly, he was too patient at times against Washington and I think it cost him additional yardage as he let plays develop too long against Washington’s strong defense. He is rarely stopped for a loss of yardage. In fact, I noted it midway through one of the games I watched and went back to review the play-by-play: in over 38 carries in those games he had just one negative yardage run.

McCaffrey, in my opinion, is quicker than he is fast. That showed itself at the combine where he tied for the fifth fastest 40 yard dash (4.48) but did very well in the 3 cone drill (fastest) and shuttle drill (fourth fastest). His jumping stats were also above average. No surprise given his size, he was only able to do 10 bench press reps which was the second fewest.

Note: When watching film for a player, I typically pick two games at random to watch. I do not necessarily want to watch games where they did very well or very poorly as that may not be a great illustration of their true ability. If possible, when comparing players at the same position I also like to watch film against common opponents. Full disclosure, I am not watching film of every single game any player plays, instead I am looking for a representative sample. When researching college players I use a number of resources, I would recommend bookmarking the below sites…

Robert F. Cowper is a freelance writer who lives in New Jersey. Robert works as a recreation professional, specializing in youth sports, when he isn’t acting as commissioner for his many fantasy sports leagues.