By James Vicini
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - For the first time in U.S. history, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that individual Americans have the right to own guns for personal use, and struck down a strict gun control law in the U.S. capital.
The landmark 5-4 ruling marked the first time in nearly 70 years the country's high court has addressed whether the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects an individual right to keep and bear arms, rather than a right tied to service in a state militia.
In the majority opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia said the Second Amendment protected an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
Although an individual now has a constitutional right to own guns, that new right is not unlimited, wrote Scalia, a hunter.
He said the ruling should not be taken to cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill or on laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in places like schools and government buildings or laws imposing conditions on gun sales.
The Supreme Court's last review of the Second Amendment came in a five-page discussion in an opinion issued in 1939 that failed to definitively resolve the constitutional issue.
In Thursday's opinion, the court struck down the country's strictest gun control law adopted in Washington, D.C., 32 years ago. It bans private possession of handguns and requires that any rifles or shotguns kept at home be unloaded and dissembled or bound by a trigger lock.
FIRST TIME GUN CONTROL LAW STRUCK DOWN
The ruling marked the first time that the Supreme Court has struck down a gun control law for violating the Second Amendment. The ruling could be the beginning of an era in which anti-gun regulations are subject to legal challenges.
The justices split along conservative-liberal lines in the ruling, one of the most important of the court's current term, in deciding a legal battle over gun rights in America. The ruling came on the last day of the court's 2007-08 term.
In dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer wrote, "The decision threatens to throw into doubt the constitutionality of gun laws throughout the United States."
President George W. Bush's two appointees on the court, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, both voted with the majority in finding an individual right to keep firearms.
The court adopted the gun rights position advocated by the Bush administration. White House spokesman Tony Fratto said,
"We're pleased that the Supreme Court affirmed that the Second Amendment protects the right of Americans to keep and bear arms."
Republican presidential candidate John McCain applauded the ruling and criticized his likely Democratic opponent Barack Obama for comments he had made.
"Unlike the elitist view that believes Americans cling to guns out of bitterness, today's ruling recognizes that gun ownership is a fundamental right -- sacred, just as the right to free speech and assembly," McCain said.
The ruling came the day after a worker at a plastics plant in Henderson, Kentucky, used a handgun to shoot and kill five people inside the factory before killing himself, the latest in a series of deadly shooting sprees across the country.
The United States is estimated to have the world's highest civilian gun ownership rate. Gun deaths average 80 a day in the United States, 34 of them homicides, according to Centers for Disease Control data.
The ruling was a victory for Dick Anthony Heller, a security guard who lives in a high-crime neighborhood and who wants to keep a handgun in his home for self-defense.
For decades, the meaning of the Second Amendment has been at the heart of a political and legal debate over gun control. People have argued whether the amendment guarantees the right to bear arms to individuals or to citizens in a militia.
Written more than 200 years ago, the amendment says, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Gun control advocates had feared that a ruling finding an unfettered individual right to own guns could place in jeopardy laws around the country regulating private possession of firearms -- a view taken by the liberal dissenting justices.
The justices upheld a precedent-setting U.S. appeals court ruling that individuals have a right to bear arms and that struck down the Washington, D.C., law for violating those rights.
(Additional reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky; Editing by Deborah Charles and David Wiessler)

In Canada they've taken to banning ammo since an attempt to get Canadians to register their guns failed. (registration is the first step toward banning) Your Government has probably realized that a frontal attack won't work in Amerikwa, so they'll adopt the Canuckistan plan. Either way, your gun totting days are numbered. You'll always be allowed to keep your guns. But without ammo, they'll just be shiny paper weights.

In Canada they've taken to banning ammo since an attempt to get Canadians to register their guns failed. (registration is the first step toward banning) Your Government has probably realized that a frontal attack won't work in Amerikwa, so they'll adopt the Canuckistan plan. Either way, your gun totting days are numbered. You'll always be allowed to keep your guns. But without ammo, they'll just be shiny paper weights.

They have already done that here in a more insidious way.

have you tried to buy ammo? The price has tripled, the ammo is hard to find. The government is not only buying it up but reselling OUR ammo to foreign governments which by design has caused a huge shortage and skyrocketing prices. At the rate this is going .223/5.56 will be $1 a round in the next 2 years or higher. The ATF is restricting the manufacture of civilian ammo by trickery and causing undue costs to new manufacturing facilities. With license fees up to $3000 for manufacturing this has gotten insane.

If I had the seed money I would start a ammo company but it's expensive in the least to get started. In the past I have loaded and reloaded ammo for over 30 years and considered doing this on a full scale basis. Add in the speculators on wall street driving metals prices through the roof and now brass is more than twice the price and lead has gone up as well.

If anyone thinks this stuff happens in a vacuum they are wrong.
They Jews will make ammo impossible to get and win that way..

Actually, I'm a little disappointed.
I'm one of those "worse is better" guys. Since 1968, or maybe even 1933, the Second Amendment has been suffering "Death By A Thousand Cuts".
Even though it's taking generations, the final result must be a totally disarmed American public, just like the rest of the world.
The elites who run things understand this. They are patient.
I was hoping the worst-case scenario would come into play. I wanted to see your average Joe Sixpack face the stark choice of turning in his firearms, or having a Randy Weaver style seige on his hands.
I want to fish or cut bait. I want to see White gun owners, and Whites in general, to feel extremely threatened. However, our enemies pretty much have the market cornered on patience. We can't seem to understand that the Jews are among the most patient people on earth. They have been pursuing their agenda for generations.
So, today's Supreme Court decision will put everyone to sleep for another generation or two.
The beat goes on.