It developed independently of other writing systems. Simple and crude in comparison to other early written systems, it still was writing and it was done devoid of external influences from non-negros.

However, like many things, it failed to ignite the negro mind as writing did for Semitic, Caucasian, or Asian peoples. It was born and died in southeastern Nigeria and Cameroon without spreading beyond.

I am a historian, first, foremost, and always. It is my duty to report the past accurately and free from personal interpretation. And, while that be an impossible goal, it is the goal that I, and others like me, strive for nonetheless.

Very true. I've learned many things in my 5+ decades of historical studies.
Whites build, explore, and discover more than any of the ethnicities combined.

There is no hiding it, no cloaking it, no way to excuse it, but whites explored the globe, walked on the moon, discovered cures for diseases, invented nearly everything you can touch. ALL while the other races wallowed in the mud.

EVEN today, right now, white nations excel and when the white population is replaced, when there is no white population, the nation regresses to near neolithic levels.

As in Orwell's book, negroes and their adherents seek to alter the past to make the present more palatable. These knowing and unknowing students of the Frankfurt group claim negroes were a great people in the past but were brought down by whites, so whites OWE it to bring them back up.

NOTHING could be further from the truth.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minor Mishap

White Nationalist scholar.

I am a historian, first, foremost and always. I will not alter, hide, shirk, dodge, avoid, retreat from historical fact. I fight to my dying breath those that do on the auspice of social justice or racial supremacy--be they Negro, Caucasian or Asian.

The facts just show that Caucasian life-ways are more conducive to the social construct known as civilization.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minor Mishap

Like many other members here, he wants nothing to do with Negroids.

Very true. History and personal experiences have proven beyond all doubt in my mind they are brutal, savage, violent and indulgent creatures worthy of my disdain and avoidance.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minor Mishap

BTW, an african scholar is an oxymoron.

I disagree.

One can be a linguistic scholar, a forensic scholar, a medical scholar, or any other of a number of fields. So I see nothing wrong in being a scholar of Africa. It is a huge continent, with a fascinating history. It is the birthplace of modern humans (no offense to our creationist readers). Egypt alone is more than the worth of study.

However, a scholar who is a negro is a bit of an oxymoron as negroes have no scholarly traditions. Their global racial average IQ of 78 only furthers this opinion. A negro scholar would be a bit of shallow field as there isn't much to them, historically speaking. A 100,000-year history and little to show for it except hunter-gatherer life-ways. Their lack of development is why I claim they aren't human, not fully modern humans.

However, a scholar who is a negro is a bit of an oxymoron as negroes have no scholarly traditions. Their global racial average IQ of 78 only furthers this opinion. A negro scholar would be a bit of shallow field as there isn't much to them, historically speaking. A 100,000-year history and little to show for it except hunter-gatherer life-ways. Their lack of development is why I claim they aren't human, not fully modern humans.

Hey, you pasty devils! I'll have you know that Africans had the first (menstrual) calendars! They made them out of baboon legs and called Ishango Bones:

Quote:

Some say that the Ishango Bone is the oldest table of prime numbers. Marshack later concluded, on the basis of his microscopic examination, that it represented a six-month lunar calendar.an old Mathematical Object

This relic is so old and so sacred, the Royal Institute for Natural Sciences in Belgium. Royal Institute. So the king of Belgium can keep track of time, you bigots!

This bone is so old and so famous, they erected an oversized replica of it someplace where black people go.

Hi everyone. I have never posted on these forums before. I am white, though not a white nationalist. I am very much anti-Zionist (well I am not opposed to the idea of Jews making a Jewish state but very much opposed to doing it on top of another people and committing genocide and mass expulsion to achieve that). Anyway I thought that I would have a read through these forums out of curiosity to see the points of views of others in the world which are different to my own.

The concept of "white genocide" is something I don't agree with. Also the idea that the "white race" must be preserved. Also the idea that the "white race" is superior in some or all ways to others. Also the idea there should be a white nation for only white people.

My disagreements are not for emotional or ethical reasons, but mainly for scientific reasons.

Here are some reasons.

Monologue of biased speculation skipped.

Quote:

So the ancestors of every white person are black,

The ancestors of every human was covered with fur.
The body tends to preserve itself by using only what it needs to survive.
Why would the body produce melanin to protect the skin from UV light if it was already protected by a layer of fur?
In that respect, Caucasians must have come before Negros or they are an entirely separate species from them.

My turn,
If preserving race is so pointless, why do we send so much aid to the non- White countries?
Why do we waste so much money looking for cures for deadly diseases if we are all going die anyway?
Your whole argument has gone the way of every leftist argument, down in flames because you always neglect the human equation.