mardi 29 juin 2010

In
2005 New York magazine noted Edgar Bronfman “belongs to one of the
world’s most exclusive clubs, an impossibly elite gathering known as the
‘Mega Group.’ It consists of about a dozen inconceivably rich Jews who
get together several times a year, often in either Bronfman’s or [CBS
owner] Larry Tisch’s apartment. . . .”

In 1990, an unexpected source advised Andrew St. George—chief correspondent for The Spotlight
(forerunner of AFP)—there had been a high-level meeting at Bronfman’s
New York apartment attended by top financial patrons and leaders of the
Zionist movement. (This was the “Mega Group” although its name was not
then known.) Devoted to combating the purported “rise of anti-Semitism,”
the meeting’s participants included financier Felix Rohatyn and Jacques
Torczyner, president of the Zionist Organization of America.

Andrew’s
source told him Torczyner said, in words to these effect: “It’s time
that we put a stop to Willis Carto and his newspaper, The Spotlight.” Torczyner said specifically that Carto and his associates should be “hunted and shot like quail.”

Torczyner’s candor disturbed at least some of his fellow power brokers who responded, “We can’t use the tactics of our enemies.”

In
fact, it was the aforementioned Rohatyn who told St. George about the
meeting. A longtime newsman, St. George knew many people, Rohatyn among
them.

St. George took the story to Carto and Mark Lane, The Spotlight’s
anti-Zionist Jewish attorney, who wrote a letter to Torczyner warning
him against making further threats. Still, a continuing campaign to
destroy The Spotlight culminated with the populist weekly driven out of business in 2001. Thank goodness, AFP picked up The Spotlight’s fallen torch.

Carto
had reason to be concerned: Bronfman fingerprints were all over the JFK
assassination conspiracy. For the tip of that iceberg, see the Dec.
9&16, 2013 issue of AFP.

JACQUES TORCZYNER, born in Belgium, came to the United States in 1940 where he became active in the Zionist Organization of America, of which he served five consecutive terms as president.He has also been chairman of the American section of theWorld Jewish Congress. He was among the “Americans” who—in 1945—attended a special meeting called by Israel’s Founding Father, David Ben-Gurion, which organized support for Jewish terror groups in Palestine.
In 1990, Andrew St. George—chief diplomatic correspondent for the Washington, D.C.-based Spotlight newspaper—was quietly advised that there had been a high-level meeting in NewYork among some top financial patrons and organizational leaders of the global Zionist movement. The meeting was held at the NewYork apartment of Edgar Bronfman,head of the World Jewish Congress.

The meeting was devoted to planning for an energetic assault on the purported “rise of anti-Semitism in America.” In attendance with Bronfman were such Jewish money kings as Michael Milken and Ivan Boesky as well as Wall Street financier (and later US Ambassador to France) Felix Rohatyn, and Jacques Torczyner (then ZOA President), among others.
St. George’s source told him that during that meeting, the aforementioned Torczyner said, in words to this effect:“It’s time that we put a stop to Willis Carto and Liberty Lobby [the publisher of The Spotlight].We’ve been too patient in dealing with this man. He needs to be killed.”
Torczyner said specifically that Carto and his associates at Liberty Lobby were “not bourgeois”—that is, not simple folk without influence—and that they should be “hunted and shot like quail.”
Evidently Torczyner’s candor caused a stir with at least some of those Jewish power barons saying,“We can’t use the kind of tactics on our enemies that the Nazis used on us,” (or words to that effect).
It was Felix Rohatyn who told St. George about this meeting. Having been an international correspondent for Time-Life, St. George knew quite a host of colorful and influential people over the years, from Cuban dictator Fidel Castro to gangster Frank Costello to many others, including Rohatyn.
In any event, St. George took the story to Carto and Mark Lane, Liberty Lobby’s audacious and no-nonsense anti-Zionist Jewish attorney, who then wrote a letter to Torczyner essentially saying:“We know what you said and we take your threats seriously.You have been warned.”
Needless to say, Lane’s letter had its intended effect and as the record demonstrates, Liberty Lobby continued to wage war against Zionism until it was driven into bankruptcy and then out of business in 2001 after a long, drawn-out eight year campaign of legal harassment in courtrooms from California to Washington, DC and on to Switzerland, a series of circumstances which demonstrated, conclusively, that Zionist elements were behind the affair.
Fortunately, in the wake of the destruction of Liberty Lobby,Willis Carto and his associates—including this author, Michael Collins Piper—regrouped and established American Free Press, based in Washington, D.C.

Suffice it to say that Jacques Torczyner represents the most vile, violent and hateful elements of the Rothschild Empire.

(...)In the meantime, you might also find out why certain New York-based revisionists, who are some of the more productive revisionists, at least in terms of hyping revisionism vis a vis e-mail, are so caught up in the Mark Weber cult.

There is one New York-based revisionist who actually accomplishes something, yet, for some reason he seems to be caught up in the Weber mystique, which is largely fictitious, considering the fact that Weber himself did not even come on board at the IHR until one year before the actual take-over in 1993, meaning that Weber had little, if anything, to contribute to the IHR prior to 1993.

Then, given Weber's "contribution" -- after 1993 -- it all raises some questions as to why any serious revisionist would support him. The one New York revisionist that I am thinking of has contributed, in his own fashion, much more to revisionism than Weber, yet he still seems to be captivated by Weber.

What gives?

Since I am a known public critic of Willis Carto (with my very harsh criticisms of Willis having been widely published on the Internet) I am free to say publicly what many would not otherwise might say.

And yet, at the same time, I have been a defender of Willis Carto's role in the IHR affair and a very harsh critic, likewise, of Mark Weber's antics in the IHR affair, precisely because he deserves criticism.

Hell, I wish I was sitting on the $2 million bucks that Weber now controls, having assumed management of two estates --- originally earmarked for Liberty Lobby -- that have come under Weber's control (through the IHR).

If I had $2 million at my disposal I would spend part of it in a very simple way . . .

And if anyone who has any SERIOUS interest in revisionism-other than promoting Mark Weber (who is run by Andrew Allen, the CIA fink -- apparently related to the the Straus family if private detectives are correct -- I will be very interested in telling you how serous revisionists could effectively spend all the money that Mark Weber is sitting on.

Considering the fact that, for the last 20 years, I have been a primary writer of fundraising letters for The Barnes Review (which has 9,000 subscribers---9,000 more than Mark Weber has for the IHR---and for Liberty Lobby and then for American Free Press, it seems to me that---perhaps--- my input might mean something.

Listen folks: serious revisionists need to get control of the $2 million --- give or take a few hundred thousand -- that are in the hands of Mark Weber.

Serious revisionists need to rally key supporters of the IHR and demand that they put pressure on the IHR board of directors to redistribute the IHR wealth to REAL revisionists such as Fredrick Toben, Germar Rudolf, Mike Santomauro, Bradley Smith, and a host of other folks!

A lot of revisionists don't like Willis Carto, but the question is whether the revisionist movement is going to put its faith in Mark Weber, with all of the millions at his disposal, who is not contributing anything to revisionism, other than his constant war against Carto, rehashing age-old conflicts.

Any revisionist who is a promoter of Mark Weber should be immediately suspect. Dare I mention the names of those who continue to promote him?

What Hath Carto Wrought?Going through my files, I came across this list of all of the newspapers, magazines, books and pamphlets that Willis Carto has printed or reprinted over the years.

Quite a remarkable list.

I thought this might be of interest to Revisionists who have only heard negative things about Willis that have emanated from those who are obviously unable to achieve the same stellar publishing record themselves -----MICHAEL COLLINS PIPERThe List follows:

The Spotlight Newspaper - Weekly issues from 1975 through summer 2001The Barnes Review magazine - Monthly and then bi-monthly from 1994 to present

American Free Press newspaper - Weekly beginning in the fall of 2001
Sixty issues of RIGHT newsletter, October 1955 to September 1960.

Seven Volumes of The American Mercury, published MONTHLY by WAC from 1968 to 1980.

Forty six volumes of the Journal of Historical Review, quarterly, Spring of 1980 through Winter 1992-1993.

Five volumes (8.5 x 11 format) of the JHR - Published in 1993 by IHR. NOTE: The "new" management of the IHR seem to have failed miserably and have been unable to churn out more than a handful of issues of the IHR's journal. Contrast this to the amazing output of Willis Carto and, for that matter, of Germar Rudolf.

Washington Observer Newsletter, approximately 200 issues, possibly more. Published beginning in 1965 up through approximately September 1976.

Western Destiny, multiple issues.

The First National Directory of Rightist Groups, Publications, and Some Individuals in the United States and Some Foreign Countries.The Job Can Be Done, by Aldrich Blake (1954) - on the civil rights decisions.

White America, by Earnest Sevier Cox

Teutonic Unity, by Earnest Sevier Cox

Lincoln's Negro Policy, by Earnest Sevier Cox

Sex vs. Civilization, by Elmer Pendell

The Federal Reserve Bank, by H. S. Kenan

Dr, Strangebob: The Story of Robert Strange McNamara

The Moscow Treaty IQ and Racial Differences, by Henry Garrett

This is a Republic-Not a Democracy

The Occult Technology of PowerThe Myth of the Six Million, by David Hoggan

Debunking the Genocide Myth, by Paul Rassinier

The Holocaust Story and the Lies of Ulysses, by Paul Rassinier

The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, by H. L. Mencken

Facts Are Facts, by Benjamin Freedman

The Anti-Christ, by Friedrich Nietzsche Martin Larson's Best

The Case of Tyler Kent, by John Howland Snow

The Hybrid Race Doctrine, by Dr. Bela Hubbard

The Inequality of the Races, by Count Arthur DeGobineau

Timothy McVeigh: Mastermind or Patsy? Money Made Mysterious, essays on money that appeared in THE AMERICAN MERCURY

Our Nordic Race, by Richard Kelly Hoskins

Tax Rebellion USA, by Dr. Martin A. Larson

Tax Revolt USA, by Dr. Martin A. Larson

The Great Tax Fraud, by Dr. Martin A. Larson

The Essene Christian Faith, by Dr. Martin A. Larson

The Hoax of the 20th Century, by Dr. Arthur Butz, originally Noontide Press, 1977

Advancement to Barbarism, The Development of Total Warfare, by A. J. P. Veale

The Veale File: War Crimes Discreetly Veiled

55 Men: The Story of the Constitution, by Fred Rodell, Noontide.

The Constitution of the United States: Its Sources and Applications, by Thomas J. Norton, Noontide.

The Secret Team, by L. Fletcher Prouty

Lindbergh on the Federal Reserve Failure at Nuremberg

No Time for Silence, by Dr. Arthur App

Report From Iron Mountain, by Leonard Lewin

Pearl Harbor: The Story of the Secret War, by George Morgenstern

The Empire of the City, by H. C. Knuth

Communism in Germany

Waters Flowing Eastward

The Dynamics of War & Revolution, by Lawrence Dennis

The Coming American Fascism, by Lawrence Dennis

A Trial on Trial: The Great Sedition Trial of 1944, by Lawrence Dennis

Onward Christian Soldiers, by Donald Day

Gruesome Harvest, by Ralph Franklin Keeling

The Burden of Empire, by Garet Garrett

The Malmedy Trial

Worldwide Growth and Impact of Holocaust Revisionism, by Keith Stimeley

Behind the Balfour Declaration, by Dr. Robert John

Man & Technics, by Oswald Spengler

Sketches from Roman History, by Senator Tom Watson

FDR: The Other Side of the Coin, by Hamilton Fish

The Holocaust: 120 Questions & Answers, by Charles Weber

JFK: The Mystery Unraveled

Is Anne Frank's Diary a Hoax?, by Dietlieb Felderer

The Great Holocaust Trial, by Michael A. Hoffman II

The Dartmoor Massacre, by Vivian Bird

The Brainwashing of the German Nation, by Udo Walendy

The Lehrplan, translated by Carl Hottelet

Final Judgment, by Michael Collins Piper (multiple editions)

Best Witness: The Mel Mermelstein Affair and the Triumph of Historical Revisionism, by Michael Collins Piper

The New Jerusalem, by Michael Collins Piper

The High Priests of War, by Michael Collins Piper

Ways That Are Dark, by Ralph Townsend

Why I Survived the H Bomb, by Akira Kohchi

The Philosophy of Alfred Rosenberg, by James Whisker

The Myths of the 20th Century, by Alfred Rosenberg, translated by Vivian Bird; the only English edition at that time.

Eugenics & Race, by Dr. Roger Pearson, 1966 by Noontide Press

War Is A Racket, by Smedley Darlington Butler

Anti-Zion, by William Grimstad

The Liberty Lobby Congressional Handbook

Defend America First, America First Committee speeches

America First: The Middle East Problem in the Light of America's Traditional Policy of Non-Intervention, both booklet and tabloid editions.

White Paper on the Constitutional Convention

White Paper on the ADL

White Paper on the Genocide Convention

The Sovereignty Resolution

Free Trade & The Constitution, by Gus Stelzer The Citizens Rule Book

Innocent at Dachau, by Joseph Hallow

The Garbage Man: The Strange World of (ADL Spy) Roy Edward Bullock

The Deposition of ADL Official Alan Schwartz

Survival and Leaderless Resistance

Is the Diary of Anne Frank Genuine?, by Robert Faurisson

Flashpoint, by Ingrid Weckert

This Age of Conflict, by Ivor Benson

The Source and Technology of Illegitimate Power

The Zionist Factor, by Ivor Benson

The French Revolution, by Nesta Webster

The Strength of Samson, by Michael H. Brown

The Secret of Life, by Georges Lakowsky

The Impeachment of Man, by Savitri Devi

The Life of An American Jew in Racist, Marxist Israel, by Jack Bernstein

The War & Warriors Series:--The Red Knight of Germany, by Floyd Gibbons
--The Cruise of the Raider, by Roy Alexander
--With Rommel in the Desert, by Heinz Schmidt
--The Life & Death of the Luftwaffe, by Werner Bomback
--The Cross of Iron, by Heinrich
--Stuka Pilot, by Hans Rudel

--Panzer Leader, by General Guderian

From Moscow to Berlin, by General Zhukov Commander Extraordinaire, (Otto Skorzeny), by Charles Foley

The Forced War, by David Hoggan

The Myth of the New History, by David Hoggan

Campaign in Russia, by Leon Degrelle

Epic: The Story of the Waffen SS, by Leon Degrelle

Hitler: Born at Versailles, by Leon Degrelle - volumes two and three were translated and supposed to be in production before the destruction of the Institute for Historical Review

A Primer on Money, by Wright Patman

The Last Days of the Romanovs, by Robert Wilton

Behind Jonestown, by Ed Dieckmann

The Confessions of Kurt Gerstein, by Henri Rocques

Germany Reborn, by Herman Goering

Senator Joe McCarthy: The Story of A Great Patriot, by Larry Lent

Profiles in Populism, by Willis A. CartoPopulism vs Plutocracy, by Willis A. Carto - expanded version of Profiles in Populism

Conspiracy Against Freedom A Populist Bibliography, by Robert Hilton Weems

In 1994, Ginsburgh received much publicity on account of an article "Baruch Hagever"[3] in which he praised Baruch Goldstein who had massacred 29 Arab worshippers at the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron.[4][5] Rabbi Ginsburgh wrote that it is possible to view Baruch Goldstein's act as following five Halachic principles, namely "sanctification of God's name", "saving life" (referring to testimonies that he had allegedly received regarding a planned Arab massacre of Jews[6]), "revenge", "eradication of the seed of Amalek" and "war".[7] Motti Inbari commented on this:

In his writings, Ginzburg gives prominence to Halachic and kabbalistic approaches that emphasize the distinction between Jew and non-Jew (Gentile), imposing a clear separation and hierarchy in this respect. He claims that while the Jews are the Chosen People and were created in God's image, the Gentiles do not have this status, and are effectively considered subhuman. Accordingly, for example, the commandment "Thou shall not murder does not apply to the killing of a Gentile, since "You shall not murder" relates to the murder of a human, while for him the Gentiles do not constitute humans. Similarly, Ginzburg stated that, on the theoretical level, if a Jew requires a liver transplant to survive, it would be permissible to seize a Gentile and take their liver forcefully. From this point only a small further step is required to actively encourage and support the killing of non-Jews, as Ginzburg did in the case of Goldstein.[8]

Controversy
In a statement to Moment Magazine Friedman was quoted as saying:

"I don’t believe in western morality, i.e. don’t kill civilians or children, don’t destroy holy sites, don’t fight during holiday seasons, don’t bomb cemeteries, don’t shoot until they shoot first because it is immoral. The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle In response to the offense that Jews, Muslims, and others took to the statement Friedman responded:

"It is obvious, I thought, that any neighbor of the Jewish people should be treated, as the Torah commands us, with respect and compassion. Fundamental to the Jewish faith is the concept that every human being was created in the image of G-d, and our sages instruct us to support the non-Jewish poor along with the poor of our own brethren.

The sub-question I chose to address instead is: how should we act in time of war, when our neighbors attack us, using their women, children and religious holy places as shields. I attempted to briefly address some of the ethical issues related to forcing the military to withhold fire from certain people and places, at the unbearable cost of widespread bloodshed (on both sides!) -- when one’s own family and nation is mercilessly targeted from those very people and places."[6]

Just weeks after the arrest of alleged Jewish terrorist, Yaakov
Teitel, a West Bank rabbi on Monday released a book giving Jews
permission to kill Gentiles who threaten Israel.

Rabbi
Yitzhak Shapiro, who heads the Od Yosef Chai Yeshiva in the Yitzhar
settlement, wrote in his book "The King's Torah" that even babies and
children can be killed if they pose a threat to the nation.

Shapiro based the majority of his teachings on passages quoted from the Bible, to which he adds his opinions and beliefs.

"It
is permissable to kill the Righteous among Nations even if they are not
responsible for the threatening situation," he wrote, adding: "If we
kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven
commandments - because we care about the commandments - there is nothing
wrong with the murder."

Several
prominent rabbis, including Rabbi Yithak Ginzburg and Rabbi Yaakov
Yosef, have recommended the book to their students and followers.

Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y) told a group of Orthodox Jews in Washington, D.C. on June 9 that the West must “strangle” the Palestinians “economically” to force them to not only accept Israel’s dominance in the region, but also Jewish religious beliefs. Here is what this top U.S. legislator had to say:

The Palestinian people still don’t believe in the Jewish state, in a two-state solution. More do than before, but a majority still do not. Their fundamental view is the Europeans treated the Jews badly and gave them our [i.e., Palestinian] land—this is Palestinian thinking. . . . They don’t believe in the Torah, in David. . . . You have to force them to say Israel is here to stay. The boycott of Gaza to me has another purpose—obviously the first purpose is to prevent Hamas from getting weapons by which they will use to hurt Israel—but the second is actually to show the Palestinians that when there’s some moderation and cooperation, they can have an economic advancement. When there’s total war against Israel, which Hamas wages, they’re going to get nowhere. And to me, since the Palestinians in Gaza elected Hamas, while certainly there should be humanitarian aid and people not starving to death, to strangle them economically until they see that’s not the way to go, makes sense.

Frightened that one of its Mossad hit men could be extradited from Poland to Germany, or sent to Dubai to be put on trial for planning the murder of a Hamas leader, Israel is demanding he be sent back to Israel immediately. So far, European authorities are standing firm in spite of pressure from Israel, the United States and powerful global Jewish groups.

Behind the scenes, Israeli diplomats have put pressure on Germany to drop its demand that Polish authorities hand over a Mossad agent using the name “Uri Brodsky.” It appears Brodsky, an Israeli citizen, helped acquire a German passport for a Michael Bodenheimer, who was a member of the 25-person assassination team that murdered Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in a Dubai hotel on Jan. 19, 2010.

According to German federal authorities, even though Brodsky was not on the killing team in Dubai, he was a central player in a Mossad squad that planned the assassination from Europe. The Germans have evidence he went with Bodenheimer to a passport office in Cologne a year before the killing and helped him fraudulently acquire a German passport.

Since January 2010, Interpol has worked tirelessly with intelligence agencies from Australia, Ireland, Britain, France and Germany to track down the Mossad assassins. For reasons not yet clear, Brodsky—and that may not be his real name—tried to enter Poland through Warsaw’s international airport several weeks ago, using an Israeli passport. Little did he know Interpol was already on his trail, having been supplied with photos of him and other personal details by the BND, Germany’s foreign intelligence agency.

His arrest has generated panic in Tel Aviv, and ever since there has been mounting pressure from the Israeli government on Washington to intervene with Poland and Germany to have Brodsky sent home.

In the meantime, the police chief in Dubai, who has led a thorough investigation of the assassination and who is sitting on compelling DNA and fingerprint evidence that could identify the killers, is considering seeking the Mossad agent’s extradition. He told reporters if the Germans could demonstrate Brodsky was a player in the logistical planning leading to the assassination he should be tried in Dubai.

According to high-level diplomatic sources in Europe, this extradition could just be the beginning of a spate of others as Interpol follows credible leads. British intelligence is reported to be pursuing tip-offs in its search for a Scot who was part of the killing team. Interpol is convinced many of the assassins were unable to make it back to Israel and some may even be hiding out in the United States.

There is also growing anger in European capitals at the FBI’s failure to respond to information supplied by Interpol and police in Dubai. In particular, Dubai police chief Lt. Gen. Dahi Khalfan Tamim has wondered why the FBI has not thoroughly investigated how the assassins were able to acquire and use prepaid MasterCards issued by a New York-based company, Payoneer Inc., with offices in Tel Aviv.

The company was founded in 2005 by Yuval Tal, a former Israeli special forces commando used by Fox News as an expert during Israel’s war with Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2006.

The way Payoneer works is that it is a middleman, issuing prepaid credit cards backed by its partner, Metabank, which has offices in Iowa. The latter says no suspicious flags were raised about cards later used by the Dubai assassins. Prepaid cards are not deemed currency under U.S. law and are therefore poorly regulated. For example, Payoneer is not required by law to list suspicious activity reports with the Treasury Department or to be a member of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes EnforcementNetwork.

After the assassination, Interpol and the Dubai police expected the FBI to use its statutory powers to examine all Payoneer and Metabank transactions, but that does not appear to have happened.

Meanwhile, it would be hard for Washington to publicly oppose the extradition of Brodsky from one NATO nation to another or even to the United Arab Emirates, which has supported Washington’s Iran policy. Washington has supported the extradition of historians and scholars who have been prosecuted for thought crimes such as questioning the “Holocaust” of World War II. #

Meet the Worst Anti-Zionist of Them All
(...) The new Likudniks have not only transformed the Likud party
from a right wing, but basically liberal-democratic party into a one
with totalitarian and racist leanings. They have also contributed much
to the flourishing racism of their constituency ranging from the chants
of “death to Arabs” by Beitar Jerusalem fans to Amir Benayoun’s latest
song about the Arab student who is reveling in Israel’s delights only
waiting to kill Jews at some point. But they have not yet purged Israel
of old conceptions of Zionism as befits the genuinely totalitarian
country they are envisaging, and parties like Labor, Yesh Atid and even
Meretz, God forbid, still dare to call themselves Zionist. It’s time for
the new Likudniks to leave a genuine mark on Israel, and I have the
perfect plan for them. They should address a terrible scandal that
taints Israel’s cities: all of them have one of their main streets named
after a bearded Viennese self-hating Jew called Theodor Herzl. This man
wrote a despicable book called Altneuland, containing absolutely horrid
anti-Zionist propaganda. He promoted a country in which Jewish
religion has no formal standing at all. Herzl believed that the
Temple-Mount should be avoided, and any reconstruction of the temple
should just be another synagogue. Worst of all: Herzl’s horrible work
takes pride in the treacherous notion that the Nation-state of the Jews
gives completely equal rights to all citizens, including Arabs, and is
cosmopolitan in nature. (...)

The extensive research of the late Pacquitta DeShishmaraff, an American-born woman married into the Russian aristocracy, confirms Ginsberg's central role in formulating what we know today as the Protocols and the rise of its influence as a philosophical work underlying the nature of the Zionist movement. Her seminal work, Waters Flowing Eastward (written under the pen name "L. Fry") remains the first-and last-word on the history of the Protocols.We learn that, in 1889, Ginsberg formulated a small group known as the Sons of Moses and it was before this group that Ginsberg first introduced the Protocols. While he may have indeed borrowed from previously published geopolitical works-lending to the oft-stated claim that the Protocols were forgeries" that were lifted from other volumes-what we do know as the Protocols were Ginsberg's product, reflecting his global Jewish agenda. During the years that followed, Hebrew-language translations of the Protocols were circulated within the Zionist movement by Ginsberg and his followers, now banded together as the Sons of Zion (or "B'nai Zion").And in 1897, when the Zionist Congress met in Switzerland, Zionism emerged as an official movement, the Protocols were effectively incorporated into the Zionist (that is, Jewish) agenda.While the non-Jewish world perceived Zionism to be strictly devoted to the establishment of a Jewish state, Ginsberg's so-called "secret Zionism" was very much recognized, within elite Jewish circles, as the real agenda, an international agenda, in effect masked in a strictly nationalist agenda focused on a single Jewish state in Palestine.So it was no mistake when Jewish writer Bernard Lazare, writing in his famous 1894 book, Anti-Semitism, candidly spoke of Jewish "economic conquest" but said that along with economic domination by the Jews came “spiritual domination" as well. He understood the distinctions.As early as 1924, Polish nationalist Roman Dmowski recognized these distinctions, which still remain a mystery to many--particularly certain American "patriots"--who attempt to make a distinction between Zionism and Judaism and who tend to believe that certain sects of "anti-Zionist Jews" are somehow standing in opposition to the New World Order.Although, as we noted earlier, there are anti-Zionist Jews who --for a variety of reasons--do oppose Zionism, there are those anti-Zionist Jews who are actually advocates of the establishment of The Jewish Utopia, that New World Order about which we hear so much.

(...) Waters Flowing Eastward makes the point that the Protocols are consistent in mentality with other earlier known Jewish writings, to include portions of the Talmud and Pentateuch. Chapter 2.1 “How the Protocols Came to Russia” cites the following:

In 1492, Chemor, chief Rabbi of Spain, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice, when a Spanish law threatened expulsion.2 This was the reply:

" Beloved brethren in Moses, we have received your letter in which you tell us of the anxieties and misfortunes which you are enduring. We are pierced by as great pain to hear it as yourselves. The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the following:

As for what you say that the King of Spain obliges you to become Christians: do it, since you cannot do otherwise.

As for what you say about the command to despoil you of your property: make your sons merchants that they may despoil, little by little, the Christians of theirs.

As for what you say about making attempts on your lives: make your sons doctors and apothecaries, that they may take away Christians' lives.

As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues: make your sons canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their churches.

As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always mix in affairs of State, that by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them.

Do not swerve from this order that we give you, because you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power.

(Signed) PRINCE OF THE JEWS OF CONSTANTINOPLE."

Michael Collins Piper underscores this point more deeply in The New Babylon, in his chapter “The Talmudic Origins of the New World Order,” pages 60-61. The Talmud is the primary scripture of Jews:

Dr. Auguste Rohling, a professor at the University of Prague in the late 19th Century was a student of Hebrew and assembled a translation of the Talmud. This is what Rohling described as the basis of the Talmud:

The soul of the Jew is part of God Himself; the souls of the other peoples come from the Devil and resemble those of brutes;

Domination over other peoples is the right of Jews alone;

Awaiting the coming of the Messiah, the Jews live in a continual state of war with other peoples;

When the victory of the Jews is won, other peoples will accept the Jewish religion; however the Christians will not be given this privilege, but will be exterminated because they belong to the Devil.

The Jew is the substance of God; a Gentile who strikes him deserves death;

Non-Jews are created to serve Jews

A Jew is forbidden to show mercy to his enemies;

A Jew may be a hypocrite to a non-Jew;

To despoil a non-Jew is permitted;

If anyone returns to a Christian something he has lost, God will not pardon him;

God has ordained that the Jew shall take usury from the non-Jew in order to injure him;

The best of the non-Jews should be exterminated; the honest life of a Gentile should be the object of hate;

If a Jew can deceive a Gentile by pretending to be a non-Jew, he is permitted to do so.

(...)

As another important point, when Jewish groups denounce the Protocols as a forgery or false reproduction, they can do so with sly prevarication.

Rather than meaning something false, the word “forgery” can also mean a replication of something authentic, as in a forged signature on a check that is intended to be an identical reproduction by an imposter of the signature of an actual person.(...)

If anything, it is possible that the Protocols available to the public today pulls its punches and does not go far enough in terms of reflecting the subversive, psychopathic, and perverse side of Jews Consider, for example, on page 100 of The New Babylon where Michael Collins Piper writes:

A perceptive Russian writer, Vladimir Begun, in 1977, in a his book, Invasion Without Arms, compared Ginsberg with the fascists of the 1930s and 1940s. Referring to an 1898 article by Ginsberg entitled "Nietzcheanism and Judaism," in which Ginsberg expressed what we might call Ginsberg's "Judeo-Zionist chauvinist" outlook, Begun said:

It is not difficult for the reader to reach the logical conclusion: insofar as there is a "super nation" then like [Nietzsche's Superman] it must march toward its goal over the corpses of others. It must show no consideration toward anyone or anything in order to achieve the domination of "the chosen" over "the heathen."One can trace the links of a single chain, the Torah-the ideological basis of the Zionist "theoreticians" -aggression in the Middle East-and the corruption of minds in Israel (openly) and in other countries (secretly).

The extensive research of the late Pacquitta DeShishmareff, an American-born woman married into the Russian aristocracy, refutes the hackneyed old saw (heard and seen in one form or another almost daily in the mainstream media) that what we know today as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion were some sort of "forgery." Nothing could be further from the truth.

DeShishmareffs seminal work, Waters Flowing Eastward (written under the pen name "L. Fry") remains the first -- and last -- word on the history of the Protocols. She firmly identified a Jew born in Russia, Asher Ginsberg (1856 to 1926), as the philosophical godfather of the infamous "Protocols."

Ginsberg -- best known as "Ahad Ha'am" (which means "One of the People") -- held the view that Jews needed to come together to make agricultural settlements in Palestine which would serve as what has been described as "a Hebrew-speaking cultural center for world Jewry -- an elite cultural center for world Jewry."

An Orthodox Jew, educated in rabbinical studies, Ginsberg said Jews were a "super nation" whose "ethnic genius must guarantee their right to world domination." He said, "the Land of Israel must encompass all the countries of the earth in order to improve the world through God's Kingdom."

In the view of Jewish writer Moshe Menuhin, Ginsberg's Zionist philosophy was "a spiritual Zionism -- an aspiration for the fulfillment of Judaism and not political Zionism" -- that is, the gathering of the entirety of the Jewish people in a single state, isolated from the rest of the planet, thriving only among their own people therein.

Ginsberg took issue with what he considered preeminent Zionist leader Theodore Herzl's concept that Zionism was economic in nature and should be directed toward the establishment of a political and geographic state. In the view of Menuhin, Ginsberg regarded the Jews as "a unique sort of nation, a homogeneous body apart from the other nations" and that "a Jewish spiritual center in Palestine" would become "a light to the Diaspora" (the scattered Jews around the Earth) and eventually enable the Jewish people to become "a light to the nations." This so-called "spiritual Zionism" of Ginsberg was thus synonymous with classical, prophetic Judaism, no different from the teachings of the Talmud that guided Judaism down through the centuries.

In short, the commonly-held theory advanced by many people today that "Zionism is not Judaism and Judaism is not Zionism" is wrong-simply wrong.

We learn that, in 1889, Ginsberg formulated a small group known as the Sons of Moses and it was before this group that Ginsberg first introduced the Protocols. While he may have indeed borrowed from previously published geopolitical works -- lending to the oft-stated claim that the Protocols were "forgeries" that were lifted from other volumes -- what we do know as the Protocols were Ginsberg's product, reflecting his global Jewish agenda.

During the years that followed, Hebrew-language translations of the Protocols were circulated within the Zionist movement by Ginsberg and his followers, now banded together as the Sons of Zion (or "B'nai Zion").

And in 1897, when the Zionist Congress met in Switzerland, Zionism emerged as an official movement, the Protocols were effectively incorporated into the Zionist (that is, Jewish) agenda.

While the non-Jewish world perceived Zionism to be strictly devoted to the establishment of a Jewish state, Ginsberg's so-called "secret Zionism" was very much recognized, within elite Jewish circles, as the real agenda, an international agenda, in effect masked in a strictly nationalist agenda focused on a single Jewish state in Palestine.

Although there are anti-Zionist Jews who -- for a variety of reasons -- do oppose Zionism, there are also those anti-Zionist Jews who are actually advocates of the establishment of the Jewish Utopia, which is, in fact, the New World Order about which we hear so much. (See article beginning on page 41 of this issue of TBR [Editor's Note: "Utopia...for Some"].)