Friday, December 12, 2014

Summer, Swimming, and Brain-Eating Amoeba

By AB

Imagine
for a moment that you’re a parent. It’s a hot summer day and you’ve brought
your child to the beach. The water is warm and shallow and your child swims for
a few hours before you return home, tired and satisfied.

After
a few days, your child begins to complain of a fever and headache. You aren’t
worried – it’s probably a cold. Yet, the symptoms continue and your child now
complains of abdominal and neck pain. You give them ibuprofen and send them to
bed, confident that they will soon break the fever and feel better.

This,
however, doesn’t happen. During lunch the next day your otherwise healthy child
experiences a seizure – a first. Panicked, you bring your child to the hospital
where they are subjected to many tests. They, like you, are scared, but you try
to hide your fear as you await diagnosis.

The
doctor returns stating that he believes your child has bacterial meningitis.
Your child is given antibiotics and taken to get a CT scan, but there does not
appear to be any brain abnormalities as expected.

Over
the next couple of days your child seizures get more severe and more frequent
as their condition worsens. Suddenly, they are struggling to breathe and
doctors rush to force a tube down your child’s throat. You fear the worst, and
your expectations are soon met as your child slips into a coma.

You wonder how just over a week ago your child
was healthy and happy. After all, they’d been swimming a few days prior! You
wonder what happened and how their condition progressed so quickly.

Still
desperate for answers, the doctors take your child for yet another CT scan.
However, this time they see something and the doctors tell you what you fear.
Your child is dying. Their brain is dying. And nothing can be done. Your child
is taken off life support and you ask that an autopsy be performed.

Over
a week too late, your child is finally diagnosed with primary amoebic meningoencephalitis,
or PAM. The doctor says that, while swimming, a brain-eating amoeba swam into
your child’s nose and made its way to their brain. Once it got there… Well, you
can imagine. You blame yourself. Why did you let your child swim at that beach?
Why weren’t you warned about the beach’s condition? And why couldn’t your child
have been saved?

Unfortunately,
detection of Naegleria fowleri, the
causative agent of PAM, is a difficult task – both in environmental and
clinical settings. N. fowleri, also
called “brain-eating amoeba,” is ubiquitous in warm aquatic environments,
ranging from lakes and ponds to puddles and hot springs around the world.
Further, N. fowleri concentrations
fluctuate greatly in response to changes in both temperature and weather, as well
as changes in bacterial populations, which serve as a food source for the
amoeba. N. fowleri levels even vary
at different locations within one water source (1). The combination of these
factors make it difficult to monitor amoeba levels environmentally because
testing would have to be frequent, causing a drain of both time and money.

Clinical
detection of N. fowleri is also a
difficult task, mostly due to the rapid progression of PAM. The amoeba enters
the host’s nose via contaminated water, after which it begins to make its way
across the nasal mucosal tissues and to its final destination – the brain (3).
Phase I symptoms, usually occurring within two weeks of infection by N. fowleri, include fever, headache,
sore neck, nausea, and vomiting (1). These symptoms are common and as such are
often assumed to be the result of something far less deadly, such as a cold or
flu.

PAM then progresses rapidly to
Phase II, at which point the amoeba have entered the brain and cause tissue
damage via hemorrhaging, inflammation, and necrosis or tissue death (3). Symptoms
are more severe at this point, including altered brain function, seizures, and
hallucination. It is during Phase II that most patients are brought to the
hospital (1). However, when presenting these symptoms patients are often
misdiagnosed with bacterial or viral meningitis and, as a result, go untreated.
The lack of early, adequate treatment ultimately results in coma and death
within a week following the onset of symptoms (1).

Diagnosis of PAM is accomplished
via observation of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) or brain tissue resulting in the
detection of amoeba or by CT scan of the brain. However, microscopic
observation of CSF and tissues takes a long time, so amoeba are usually not
detected until the patient has reached the late stages of PAM (2). CT scan is
usually able to detect physical changes to the brain, but these neurological
effects are usually not visible until the later stages as well (2). Either way,
diagnosis of PAM usually progresses far too slowly to allow for treatment,
resulting in a fatality rate of over 99% (1). Even so, a couple of cases in the
U.S. have been successfully treated due to early diagnosis (2).

Clearly
the clinical outcome of PAM is very grim, but how common is this disease? The U.S.
sees fewer than 10 cases of PAM each year. In fact from 1962-2008, a period of 46
years, there were only 111 confirmed cases of PAM in the U.S., all of which
occurred in southern states (1). Of these cases, 62.2% involved children
younger than 13 years old and just fewer than 80% of the cases occurred in
males (1). Distributing the 111 PAM cases equally throughout the 46 years, the
U.S. would see about two cases every year. However the distribution of these
cases is not evenly distributed, but rather has been shown to be increasing during
recent years (1).

Interestingly, this increase has
been attributed to global warming, which plays a role in increased prevalence
because climate is an important risk factor for N. fowleri infection. N. fowleri
is a thermophile, and thus prefers warm climates. This explains why all
previously known cases of PAM in the U.S. were isolated to southern states,
only reaching as far north as Missouri (1). However, recent confirmed cases of
PAM in Minnesota suggest that the warm temperatures during the summer months
are sufficient for N. fowleri growth,
even in colder northern U.S. climates (2). As the effects of global warming
intensify and northern summers continue to increase in temperature, there is no
doubt that the expansion of N. fowleri
and PAM to other cooler climates throughout the world will continue (2).

Aside from climate, other important
risk factors for N. fowleri infection
include the increased use of recreational water sources and the disruption of sediment
while taking part in water-related activities (1). As recreational water
sources are utilized more and more in the U.S., particularly during the summer
months when N. fowleri levels are
highest and swimming and boating become common pastimes, humans enter the
natural environment in which the amoeba are found (1). As a result of increased
interaction between human hosts and amoeba, there is also an increase in PAM
prevalence (1). Disruption of sediment occurs with the disruption of water,
resulting indirectly via splashing and diving or directly by digging or the
dragging of feet (1). Such behaviors cause sediment, and amoeba within, to be
dispersed. This ultimately increases the likelihood of amoeba entering the
nasal cavity (1).

Unfortunately,
the prevention of N. fowleri infection
and subsequent progression of PAM has been difficult to address. However the
amoeba’s life cycle and its ability to survive in the environment allow many
points of intervention. First, the environmental levels of N. fowleri must be controlled. As previously discussed,
environmental monitoring of this pathogen is not likely to be an effective
control method (2). However, by studying ways in which the amoeba interacts
within this aquatic niche, we may be able to develop strategies to reduce N. fowleri levels with minimal effects
on the rest of the aquatic ecosystem.

Following
the amoeba’s interaction with aquatic environments is its interaction with the
human host. Many strategies can be used to prevent this interaction. We could
use recreational water sources less during summer months, or refrain from
activities that promote the disruption of sediment (2). These behaviors would
prevent interaction between the human host and amoeba when the N. fowleri levels and risk of infection
are greatest. However, activities such as swimming and boating have become
greatly anticipated summer activities, and as such it is unlikely that people
will give them up. This is particularly true because, as it is difficult to recognize
the presence of N. fowleri unless
recreational water source users bring their own microscopes, and as the optimal
concentration of N. fowleri for
promoting infection is not currently known, most people will not be willing to
give up these activities when their own risk of N. fowleri infection may already be slim. Even so, an easy way to
prevent N. fowleri infection on an
individual level is through the use of nose clips or plugging one’s nose while
swimming (2). Although these behaviors would also reduce risk, nose plugs are
uncomfortable, and children, who are most at risk, would not be likely to want
to wear them.

This leads
us to the greatest paradox related to the issue: Why is it that N. fowleri, an amoeba that is so common
in the environment, causes PAM, a disease that seems to be so rare? Much of the
answer to this question is not known at this time, likely lying within complex
host-pathogen interactions. Since little research has been done in this area to
date, perhaps the best way to address N.
fowleri infection is through a call to scientists to get involved in
answering this question.

However,
the answer is not simply scientific research. Much of the U.S. population has
never heard of N. fowleri or PAM, and
education will also play an integral role in tackling this disease. By better
educating parents and doctors on the symptoms and risk factors of PAM, perhaps
those afflicted by this disease can be diagnosed and treated earlier. Although
quick diagnosis is important, there is also a need for better treatment
methods, and together, these two solutions could help drastically reduce the
fatality rate of PAM.

Although
better clinical methods are necessary for overcoming PAM, there is also a need
for better epidemiological data, both within the U.S. and around the world.
Although the public health burden of PAM is not huge at this time, it is
clearly increasing (1). Internationally, little data has been compiled
regarding PAM, particularly in the developing world where due to inadequate
sanitation and lack of secure water sources the disease is very likely to have
a much greater burden (5). By compiling better data, we would be able to, not
only get a better grasp on the real public health burden of N. fowleri and PAM, but we would also be
able to make much needed headway on discovering other risk factors of infection
and disease progression.

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Us

This blog represents the work of students from one of the few courses devoted to Eukaryotic Microbiology as a whole. This is a new experiment for this course that we hope will be a successful fusion of student learning and science communication. Enjoy, but play nice, comments are welcome but mean-spirited comments will be deleted.