Craig Faunch and Ian Wathey of Wakefield, England were one of the first gay couples to be approved to serve as foster parents in the U.K., taking in 18 children in only 15 months. And right away, there were problems:

With no previous convictions, they came across as respectable men who simply wanted to help boys with a variety of problems.

In reality, they were paedophiles, who repeatedly abused the children in their care.

Even when the mother of two of the children reported her suspicions to the council, officials accepted the men’s explanations and did nothing.

Instead of banning children from staying with Faunch and Wathey, they sent youngsters with more serious problems to them. Between them, the couple abused four boys aged between eight and 14.

In a scathing report published yesterday, Wakefield Metropolitan District Council was condemned for treating the men as “trophy carers”.

…

“It was clear that a number of staff were afraid of being thought homophobic.

“The fear of being discriminatory led them to fail to discriminate between the appropriate and the abusive.”

Good Lord, where to begin? There are scumbags in every walk of life; gays aren’t immune to that phenomenon. I’ve said many times that there is no connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse. But that certainly doesn’t mean that there aren’t pedophiles who are also gay. It happens, proportionally aboutasoftenasstraightsabusekids.

That’s why investigating credible allegations of inappropriate behavior with underage children is not homophobic; it’s exercising proper responsibility. The idea that conducting an investigation might be “homophobic” is ludicrous, whether we’re talking about foster parents or Senators.

Sure, we’ve seen where anti-gay hysteria has led to wrongful convictions, and yes, those investigations and prosecutions were driven by homophobia. But it’s pretty easy to avoid that: conduct a proper investigation which doesn’t make assumptions based on the alleged perpetrator’s sexuality. That’s really not difficult to do.

Investigators should not let personal assumptions convict someone without sufficient evidence, nor should fear of being branded “homophobic” deter an investigation and risk leaving vulnerable children exposed. It’s no more homophobic to investigate credible claims of sexual abuse by gays than it is heterophobic to investigate straights. But refusing to investigate out of fear of being labeled homophobic is both patronizing and cowardly, and it implies that they are afraid that if they look too closely they may provide evidence that there is something to the stereotype.

But guess what? Just because it’s a stereotype doesn’t mean it can’t be true in particular instances. There really are Whites who can’t jump and Appalachians who can’t read. And in this case, trying to avoid a stereotype ended up being criminally negligent. Just ask the kids who were put into Faunch’s and Wathey’s care after the first complaints surfaced.

Let’s be clear: It is not gay bashing or homophobic to investigate allegations of child sexual abuse — or any other serious claims of wrongdoing for that matter. So let’s put an end to that excuse, shall we?

Also, there is a huge difference between protecting children, which is not homophobic, and harassing gay people adopting children, which is homophobic. If you get a report or suspect that someone or some couple is molesting their charges then they ought to be investigated. If, on the other hand, you keep launching investigations against someone even though you never find anything suspicious you might have a case of harassment. Again, there is a big difference between the two and the social workers didn’t even come close.

At least they could have had a gay or lesbian social worker do the investigation if they thought that their being gay would bias the investigation or seem homophobic. I’m sure that the agency had to have some gay or lesbian social workers!

I have to wonder in this case if part of the problem may have come from the anti-gay orgs crying wolf so much about gay people all being child molesters. If one hears that often enough and recognizes it as just more anti-gay bs, that might set up a slight automatic bias against taking real complaints as seriously as one otherwise would have.

Absolutely none of which absolves the social workers in this case from failing to do their jobs and allowing more kids to be hurt.

What a tragedy for all people involved, and all walks of life involved: social workers, gays, children, and foster parents.

Not only will people like Regina Griggs (recent recipient of the LaBabs Award) point to this as proof that Homosexuals have “special rights” or “super rights” and protection – it has possibly pushed back adoption rights for gays and lesbians for another 10 years. This might be my over-reaction, and nothing would make me happier than to know it is. But this will be THE KEY CASE people like Paul Cameron, James Dobson, and “Dubya” will point to in order to deny equal rights to us. They will say: “see how the floodgates opened? THE FIRST gay couple to get foster parent rights ended up being ABUSERS just like we SAID they would!!!”

I’ve said this before: Being in a minority means you’ll automatically be judged by the worst of us. It will take a thousand positive gay foster parent occurances to counteract this one negative one.

Care to bet on whether or not Paul Cameron comes out with an article stating that 100% of gay foster parents have molested their charges in Britian?

I’ve seen this happen before.

When six gay teenage boys alleged they had engaged in sexual activities with three staff members of the Gay and Lesbian Adolescent Social Services in 1996, Judith Reisman – the “erotoxons” lady – stated, with no basis, that 100% of the gay youth serviced by GLASS have been harassed, in contrast to “only” 15% of high school students across the US who report they have been sexually harassed by teachers or other school staff members. However, 6 is not even 4% of the more than 175 adolescents serviced by GLASS at that time. The teens’ allegations couldn’t even be verified, and some therapists who treated them earlier and other youth who lived with them in the agency’s facilities stated they were most probably lying, and the accused men couldn’t even be prosecuted because of lack of evidence. However, there was Judith Reisman, saying that for sure 100% of the adolescents were molested.

I think the reason people like Judith Reisman and, to a lesser extent, Paul Cameron feel so confident making such wildly false allegations is that they don’t write for the general public, they write to people who a priori believe what they’re going to say.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.