Friday, May 26, 2017

Beyonce Accused of Fraud

Beyoncé battle to secure the rights to her daughter's name, Blue Ivy, is heating up as the singer's manager is being asked to provide key evidence in the case that could prove the singer committed trademark fraud.

Jonathan Schwartz, the executive vice president of the Lemonade singer's company BGK Trademark Holdings, filed an application in February to trademark the power couple's five-year-old daughter's name to launch a series of products including mobile devices, hair care, a clothing line, and even video games.

But earlier this month, Veronica Morales, the owner of a Los Angeles company specializing in event-planning and entertainment services called Blue Ivy, challenged the request.

Morales claimed the famous pair have no intention of actually selling any products, and instead are just trying to trademark the name 'merely so that nobody else could.'

30 comments:

I hope they aren't about to pimp Blue out! Not the richest couple in the whole wide world.

Seriously Bey, BIC is like 5 years old if nobody has tried to profit off her name they probably never will. It's pretty arrogant to think that you are so grandeous that people are clamoring to use your daughter's name to make a profit.

Ur exactly right what's in a name. If the ppl request BIC bit h record, the world will know Beyondsay's real age. She's in her 40's like Gabby Union and her M. Knowles said. She's so vain, that static will force her to lose her wig n drop suit.

I know some of her fam...like first cousins. They have always said that B is much older than she claims but who the fuck cares. It's the biz, many do it and are encouraged to do it, so what.What concerns me is, this woman started her business before BIC was born and now you want this woman to change the name of her company that she spent years building because you decided to name you daughter the same name? That's just straight up shady as f*kc. No respect for anyone else let alone self. As much as I love me some Beyonce, this kind of thing makes not want to support her any longer.

Well I went to the same middle school as Bey Kelly and LeToya and I have seen the yearbook photos. She is NOT lying about her age. Her cousins (who i doubt you talked to) are most likely jealous losers. Like someone already posted a video of her on Star Search in 1993 and yall still have your doubts? *in my Remy Ma voice* "Like are you dumb?"

@1:06 Not lying, not losers, went to HU. I don't know why they would lie. They do well in their own right. If you went to the same jh as her, like you claim cuz you could be lying, then great. I really don't care how old she is. If you read the whole comment, you would know that I think her age is irrelevant. But your simple self just had to come on here with unnecessary insults. Those are loser qualities to me. Why not just speak your truth and be done? This wasn't even the topic of the post.

I can't take any of this seriously. Beyonce is fighting a business woman over Blue's name yet she and Jay took no action when that nasty Blue/RKelly joke was aired on Difficult People. Hell, the beehive made more of a fuss over the joke than her own damn parents. I'm not a parent but if I were, protecting the dignity of my innocent child would be far more important than trademarking and licensing her name.

Well Beyonce's dad Mathew said on The Breakfast Club that Beyonce is the same age as Usher. Usher is 38 years old. He will be 39 in October. So I will believe what her dad says out of his own mouth before anyone else. That's why the Star Search video is believable, because she only lied about being 2 years younger. The age difference of the industry age and real age isn't that dramatic. I think all of the DC members lied. They said that they were 16 when the group blew up but they really 18. A DJ named Theo revealed this back in the day, then he was quickly fired. Also LeToya said that she was 18 when the group blew up in an old S2S magazine interview. I guess their management didn't have faith that they could get the same opportunities if they had revealed that they were 19 going on 20.

I wouldnt want people profiting off my childs name either... Does anybody ever comprehend what the issue is, or do they just see "Beyonce,fraud" and just write a comment. Who was really trying to trade mark that name before she was born. They are billionaires. .. You cant really say whether they might make those businesses or now. They actually might!

I saw that Breakfast Club interview and Papa Knowles clearly said she is AROUND Usher's age. And being born in 81 would still be considered AROUND his age. And WTF is "lip singing" LMAOOOO Snitch why are your readers so moronic? I'm done. I can't argue with someone who spells inauguration "innaguration". BYE dumbass!

So because her father says something that makes it true? He didn't even keep his promise to God at the altar when he married Tina. Talkin about Beyonce's age, does he know how old his out of wedlock children are? *mic drop*

Sometimes I wonder if yall read. The owner of the entertainment company is challenging Beyonce's trademark request. She is challenging it on the grounds that Blue Ivy'sname has not and likely will not be used in commerce....while her Business name is.

Basically Morales must either have an existing or pending trademark for Blue Ivy otherwise she probably wouldnt have even known...unless she has lawyers or other folks looking out for a name she didnt (or attempt to) trademark herself. If she doesnt have an application pending or an existing trademark, Beyonce has a good chance at getting the trademark.

Furthermore, this can be easily settled by proving she was actually using the name Blue Ivy in business prior to Beyonce filing her application.

In fact, if she is stating that the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) are involved in fraud, she's really stating that the office didn't do due diligence in researching existing trademarked names and applications for BLUE IVY which would result in the PTO putting a HOLD on Beyonce's application for further investigation.

If they didnt do that...somebody is gonna have to pay that lady and it might not be Beyonce.

Beyonce can however, offer her money to drop her existing trademark and rename her business.

The only reason why this woman is always wrapped up in lies and law suits is because right or wrong her worshipers make her feel like she can do whatever she pleases, no matter who it hurts. I can't tell you how many time her brainless beybots cosign her fuk shat and expected her victims to be grateful it was their queen who thought enough of them to fuk them over. Beyonce could snatch bread away from a homeless, starving third world child and her Beybots would not only approve that shit, but dare the child to cry about it. These are the kind of Beybot idiots who say shit like..."In my eyes, Queen Beyonce can do no wrong." So now this woman's selfish head is not only void of right or wrong, good or bad, true or false, or even being fair... but it's huge AF.The original Blue Ivy business owners should sue these fools for all their worth and make them pay their legal fees, missed money and wasted time, too. It looks like her Beybot stans who are responsible for hyping her up and making her believe she is Christ and can do no wrong... are going to make her lose millions. She is going to make history once again, but this time as the queen whose billionaire status being short lived and back to being a millionaire. In other words...Literally here today...gone tomorrow.