Should any bhikkhuni give full ordination to a maiden who is fully twenty years old without the training in the precepts, [this entails a] pacittiya.

If a bhikṣuṇī, without (first) granting a maiden who is a full twenty years of age (two years of) preparatory training in the disciplinary precepts, grants her the upasaṁpadā ordination, her act constitutes a pācattika offense.

99. Should any bhikkhuni give full ordination to one who has completed her training in the precepts without the [sangha] kamma, <[this entails a] pacittiya.

If a bhikṣuṇī grants the upasaṁpadā ordination (to a śikṣaṁāṇā) who has not made the karma (asking for recognition) of her completion of the preparatory training in the disciplinary precepts, her act constitutes a pācattika offense.

Should any bhikkhuni give full ordination to a married woman, who is fully twelve rainy seasons old and who has not trained in the precepts, [this entails a] pacittiya.

If a bhikṣuṇī grants the upasaṁpadā ordination to a married girl of twelve full (rainy seasons old), without first instructing her in the disciplinary training, her act constitutes a pācattika offense.

Should any bhikkhuni give full ordination to a married woman who has received the training in the precepts but has not completed her training, [this entails a] pacittiya.

If a bhikṣuṇī confers the upasaṁpadā ordination on a woman who had been married before, though she (the woman) has not completed her preliminary training in the disciplinary precepts, her act constitutes a pācattika offense.

103. Should any bhikkhuni give full ordination to a married woman who has completed her training n the precepts without the[sangha] kamma, <[this entails a] pacittiya.

If a bhikṣuṇī confers the upasaṁpadā ordination on a married woman, without the karma asking (the Order to certify her completion of the preparatory training in the disciplinary precepts), her act constitutes a pācattika offense.