Libeskind's dramatic Dresden shard offers space for reflection

Military History Museum, Dresden – Daniel Libeskind's redesign for the Military History Museum in Dresden is his favorite work.

Hide Caption

1 of 10

10 photos

A concrete and steel wedge profoundly changes the museum's purpose, interrupting its historic role as an armory and forcing questions about history and humanity.

Hide Caption

2 of 10

10 photos

"It's not just about weapons and rockets and tanks," he says of the redesigned museum, "it's about people's decisions."

Hide Caption

3 of 10

10 photos

During the redesign, the buildings original features were also restored.

Hide Caption

4 of 10

10 photos

Libeskind says architecture is "a story-telling profession" and a great building is "not just something to think about. It has to be experienced with your feet, eyes, with your ears."

Hide Caption

5 of 10

10 photos

The Eiffel Tower, Paris – The building Libeskind most wishes he had designed is the Eiffel Tower, in Paris.

Hide Caption

6 of 10

10 photos

Constructed in 1888, Libeskind admires the boldness of its design and its technological daring.

Hide Caption

7 of 10

10 photos

"The technology had never really been used," Libeskind says. "There was no guarantee it would work."

Hide Caption

8 of 10

10 photos

Denounced as "monstrous" and "barbaric" when it was first proposed, the Eiffel Tower is now a cherished landmark in the French capital. Libeskind says a great building can change how people see their city.

Hide Caption

9 of 10

10 photos

"Some people think that architecture is like a butterfly -- it can just fly around, it's lightweight, it can do whatever it wants. I think it's more like an elephant: You can dress an elephant in funny clothing and make funny gestures but it's a serious enterprise. It's not something you can fool around with," says Libeskind.

Hide Caption

10 of 10

Story highlights

Daniel Libeskind's redesign of the Military History Museum in Dresden is his favorite work to date

"It's not just about weapons and rockets ... it's about people's decisions and how people view the world," Libeskind says

Polish-born architect wishes he had designed the Eiffel Tower, in Paris

"It's completely uncharacteristic of Paris, and yet it's such a fantastic building," he says

Daniel Libeskind, the Polish-American architect responsible for the World Trade Center site's redevelopment, says his favorite building is the Military History Museum in Dresden, Germany.

Originally an armory for Kaiser Wilhelm I and subsequently under Nazi and Soviet control, the Bundeswehr's main military museum survived the 1945 bombing of Dresden due to its location on the city's outskirts.

"It is an interesting project for me," says Libeskind, "because now it is a museum of modern democratic Germany. How to transform it? How to create a new sense of what it means to have a military in a democracy which is controlled by the citizens?"

In Libeskind's $85 million redesign, completed in 2011, a huge wedge of concrete and steel scythes through the stone, columned building, to create something he describes as "both disruptive of the old, but [that] also gives you a sense of how we have changed our thinking."

"This space is not for weapons. It's to navigate between the horizontal world of history and the vertical world of human aspiration and understanding."

"I wanted people to feel that sense of displacement, that space of catastrophe," he says. "It's not just about weapons and rockets and tanks, it's about people's decisions, and how people view the world."

The building Libeskind most wishes he'd designed is one completely at odds with its surrounds -- the Eiffel Tower, which looms over Paris' uniformly mid-rise cityscape.

"It's a building with no function, that has no program," Libeskind says. "It's completely uncharacteristic of Paris, and yet it's such a fantastic building.

Today it's one of the world's most recognizable and most-visited monuments but in its day, the tower, erected for the 1889 World's Fair, was a controversial emblem of industrialization.

Libeskind admires the daring of its design, which was innovative for its time, and the risks its engineers took -- "the technology had never really been used. There is no guarantee how it would work," he notes -- but he also admires its poetry.

"It doesn't mimic anything. It's original. It has a spirit to it, a spirit of the unknown. And when you go see it, you still wonder, what the hell is this thing? How was it built?"

"That defines for me what good architecture is: It's not a formula. It's not the pretty facade of the building. It's how the building transforms the city. It's changed how people view Paris."

"All the great artists, composers and politicians hated that building. They wanted to tear it down. They thought it was the ugliest, stupidest thing. But, in the long run, it became the most beloved and most symbolic building of France, of Paris, of Europe."

Libeskind's Dresden museum was also criticized but, he says, he never doubted it.

"Once you hit on the right idea, it's not a matter of compromising. Of course, you have to be flexible to work it out, but the big idea has to be so strong, it has to go through fire and still emerge exactly how you wanted it to be."

"If people enjoy it, the building becomes part of the city, and then people have a different idea of the city. It can have a big role in changing what the world looks like to us."