This post would be nearly perfect, except a little reproach : in the MSDN blogs page where the summary of this post is appearing , it is difficult to know that this post is related to the CodePlex site. It is a pity that Codeplex is not mentioned in this summary, i am fearing that many people are skipping of this article because they don't understand that it is related to the fixes about the Codeplex site.

Anyway, it is really useful and interesting. I hope you will go on this way

Thanks for the feedback, Papy. I'll make sure that the titles/first few sentences of our posts in the future mention CodePlex. I'll also pass your feedback along to the MSDN blogs team, as currently, the previews of the posts don't mention the blog titles.