Reading Nelson Montana's book - Bodybuilding Truth

glad I didn't buy it... he is the most sarcastic, bitter and negative person I have ever seen. His theories are interesting but are backed with nothing but threats, scare tactics and more sarcasm.

here are a few:
* Clomid does not work to restore testicular function and actually has a reverse effect.
* No pro uses Clomid.
* Anavar is worse on the lipid profile than DBol or Anadrol.
* 3 weeks is the absolute magic number for cycles.
* Deca will cause infertility.
* HCG is unneccessary during or after any cycle - because all cycles should be 3 weeks.
(that's among the first 35pages)

Is that really all the evidence proof this guy gives? Thats ridiculous. I have though spoken to guys that compete at the national level that say to stay away from nolva clomid and hcg. Of course I haven't ever recieved any reason why except "because you don't need that ****"

yeah well one of they guys told me instead of nolva clomid hcg he uses cytadrin for everything and after a little research it turns out the side and cost for that **** is ridiculous letro is the better alternative.

Back to the main topic though, what does this guy suggest to use during competition time then? I can understand dnp but t3 and clen? Don't tell me this guy says superior diet is how some of these guys shed massive amounts of fat/water in 10-12 weeks

but does/could that happen at a responsible dose of clen not exceeding 2 weeks?

I mean we hear the same things about all steroids: rot your liver, kill your kidneys, blow out your heart, ruin relationships... I know clen is a different kind of drug but aren't the side effects exaggerated when used responsibily

I will be happy to write a book and sell it to all of you as long as you do not care that I have no references and no proof other than my word.

While I have not read the book(I have read some of his posts), bbing and aas usage has grown in recent years to more of a scientific level rather than gym lure. One can present ideas but to claim others are wrong without evidence is wrong. With blood results, scientific data/research, real world experience, and logic, then there is room for debate. With only real world experience, then there is nothing more than opinions.