In his talk, Ryan was all substance, avoiding cheap campaign shots yet repeatedly bringing the audience to their feet by making clear, powerful points about energy independence, the need to deregulate, fiscal soundness, the difference between a culture of self-reliance and one of dependence, and the doctrines of Natural Law and the Declaration of Independence. That’s right, he spoke about Natural Law and the origin of rights to a campaign crowd, and they got it. In fact, along with his discussion of energy independence, it was one of the two high points of the event. I can’t remember when I’ve seen a candidate address a mass audience at such a high level and pull it off. But he did.

Previously, the support of many Colorado Republicans for Romney had been primarily based on the fact that he wasn’t Obama. With his speech today, Ryan did a lot to change that.

Dr. Robert Zubrin is president of Pioneer Astronautics, a Senior Fellow with the Center for Security Policy, and the author of "Energy Victory: Winning the War on Terror by Breaking Free of Oil". His newest book, "Merchants of Despair: Radical Environmentalists, Criminal Pseudo-Scientists, and the Fatal Cult of Antihumanism" has just been published by Encounter Books.

Click here to view the 81 legacy comments

Click here to hide legacy comments

81 Comments, 21 Threads

Have Teleprompter Will Travel reads the card of the man.
A cipher without a thought of his own in what he’s turning into a destroyed land.
His ah, oh, umm, loose mouth heeds the calling of a Mussolini wind.
A man without a clue of his own is the fascist cipher called Obamadin.
Obamadin, Obamadin, Where do you roam?
Obamadin, Obamadin, Just be sure to never leave your teleprompter at home.

He travels on to campaign and deceive whenever he feels he must
His insatiable yearning for power is his guiding lust
These are legends that themselves do spin
Of the Mussolini Ventriloquist’s dummy
Of the cipher called Obamadin
Obamadin, Obamadin, Where do you roam?
Obamadin, Obamadin, Just be sure to never leave your teleprompter at home

I’m with you on that one.That moron is a one-man singularity for democrats. I hope he comes on national TV as often as possible.
I can’t wait conservatives being accused of stealing his medications. God ALL MIGHTY!!!

Wow! Nice to know that Paul Ryan is the piece of wood that we need. Sweet to read the report from my hero, Robert Zubrin. Birds of a feather flock together

I have always thought that Romney is a very smart guy. I have followed his campaign during all the 6 years that I live in the USA. Romney is playing a very airtight game, against despicable Communist looter usurpers of this great republic.

Obama the Constitutional lecturer. What does he think of the Constitution? The Constitution is flawed because it does not allow Obama to enact reforms fast enough. I think the Constitution DOES allow Obama to enact reforms in a blink, if we all agree with the reform. What the Constitution does however, is prevent Borderline-Personality-Disorder people like his crowd from permanently usurping power and treating the rest of us as human livestock. Now, that’s frustrating if one thinks of oneself as the sharpest knife in the kitchen.

“You know, I don’t know about you, but when I was growing up, you know when I was flipping burgers at McDonalds, when I was standing in front of that big Hobart machine washing dishes or waiting tables, I never thought of myself as stuck in some station in life,” Ryan told at least two thousand fired up supporters at Lakewood High School in suburban Denver. “I thought to myself: I’m the American dream.”

I for one have rolled hamburgers at Arby’s in Michigan, have been homeless in Italy (how romantic is that?) and have worked in many other countries. Clandestine in two countries. Now I have a PhD in Mathematics, am a Math professor in America, studying for a second degree in Aerospace Engineering with a Chemistry minor. Have had job interviews at NASA Cape Canaveral, and they quite like me. How’s that after NASA has fired 7,000?

Who are you to put out rules that the others have to live by? A jobless psychiatrist? Obama is a sick narcissist because he has never accomplished anything in life, just has played the Affirmative Action like a violin, and is proud of it.

It is a healthy dose of narcissism to be proud of one’s own accomplishments.

Okay, Inspector. Ilia didn’t move this story forward, is that what you’re saying?

Ryan speaks about restoring American exceptionalism, though he may not have used those terms yesterday. Ilia is proof the American dream Ryan speaks to still exists.

I would rather listen to Ilia offer his life as proof in American exceptionalism by noting his accomplishments, than to listen to a race-baiting Affirmative Action baby who has accomplished nothing in life, yet tells me my last 25 years of worry and effort didn’t mean I built my business.

It’s time for American to get fired up again, and I welcome Ilia and Ryan to the revolution.

Ilia – you are a prime example of the American Dream! Congratulations on your degrees and for knowing that you were not ‘stuck’ with your lot in life. As a former math teacher (now software engineer), I love that you got a math degree (why do so many people think math is boring?, I personally love it) ! All the best to you in your future!

And my story is really rich. I managed to get the PhD in Mathematics in Italy, then was a postdoc in France in the moment that I came to USA to roll hamburgers. Why did I do that? Because I saw absolutely no chance of upward mobility in France. I saw France as a dim place too much involved with its own throes of Muslim ghettos and entitlement mentality. What was I going to do in France? Keep my lovely comfortable office job? I want to work. That’s why I’m getting the second degree in Aerospace Engineering. I want to work. I have plans for research, I want to accomplish. Yes, I know that social engineers want to abolish ambition, but I have it and do not intend to waste it.

ILIA, you sagacious one, you. This quote of yours, below, is one for the record books:

“Obama the Constitutional lecturer. What does he think of the Constitution? The Constitution is flawed because it does not allow Obama to enact reforms fast enough. I think the Constitution DOES allow Obama to enact reforms in a blink, if we all agree with the reform. What the Constitution does however, is prevent Borderline-Personality-Disorder people like his crowd from permanently usurping power and treating the rest of us as human livestock. Now, that’s frustrating if one thinks of oneself as the sharpest knife in the kitchen.”

I am emailing it to my friends and family, whom, I can assure you, will cheer wildly at your perceptiveness AND eloquence.

Jam on ILIA!
Darcy, that for the rereading and you are right! I read, agreed, then missed it was the blog-improving-as-he-goes ILIA. Beautiful and…yes, sagacious. Did ILIA say where he was born? Of course it doesn’t matter in a right-functioning America!

Voters in every state need to Google two things to find out who Obama really is, what his visions really are for our country, and what tactics he has been using to reach his goals. Those two things are Frank Marshall Davis and Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.

Obama’s mentor in Hawaii from when he was 10 years old to 18 years old was Frank Marshall Davis, a known communist/Marxist. Davis was a card-carrying communist and a community organizer in Chicago for several years. Then the party sent him to Hawaii to continue his communist activities. In Hawaii, Davis was a friend of Obama’s grandparents, and they had Frank Marshall Davis mentor him.

Obama spent 10 years being mentored by Davis. Davis was a community organizer in Chicago, using Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. Obama eventually went to Chicago specifically to be a community organizer and learned how to use Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.

Obama titled his book, Dreams From my Father. When Obama was 10 years old, his father went to Hawaii for about a month and then returned to Kenya. That was the only time Obama met him, so the title of his book makes no sense.

What makes sense is that Obama has been fulfilling Frank Marshall Davis’ dreams of communists taking over our country. This election isn’t a choice between Democrats and Republicans. It is a choice between a man who believes in communism and two men who believe in keeping our country free.

One more piece everyone should google: “Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis” by James Simpson. It explains the Cloward-Piven strategy. It was written in 2008 during the presidential campaign, in an effort to warn people about what Obama was really doing. Four years later, this article has proven accurate in every single respect.

“Borderline-Personality-Disorder people” – I actually know someone who has been diagnosed with this disorder and you are correct Obama fits the profile. Especially the outrageous lies, misrepresentations, blaming others etc.

And long-term, elaborated dishonest plotting. And disregard for human suffering. Remember what Obama did to Hillary?

I knew that senator Obama had a fair chance to become president since early 2008, when I saw the “Obama girl” video. I knew that it was not a random thing by a crazed fan. Indeed it revealed a well-planned move to propel Obama to national attention. Before that, nobody had heard of Obama. When the history of Affirmative Action is written, Obama and Fareed Zakaria will be mentioned by name as psychopaths that played us like a violin.

The damnation of people like Obama is the overconfidence errors that they pepper their path with. Look at Biden. God is pulling his hair off at watching that Biden has become vice-president. How did it happen? Obama wanted to show off to everybody that he didn’t really need a vice-president. Now Biden has become a liability. Will a distraction help Biden avoid a debate with Ryan? Poor Biden, will go down in history as the clown vice-president.

Even removing Biden now with whatever pretext (“voluntary retirement”) looks very bad for Obama.

As a professor teaching a chapter on Voting Systems, I asked my students one year ago “if you were in Obama Reelection Committee, what an advice would you give to him?” Here we are.

Order the candidates from left to right by voter perception, not by personal perception or by where do they really stand from Political Science viewpoint. After Obama, the leftmost seems to be… Romney. Let for the sake of the illustration the order be: (think of this graph horizontally rather than vertically. Dots represent voter distribution.)

Obama (leftmost)
.
.———— Line 1
.
Romney ——– Line 2
.
.
.
Gingrich (rightmost)
and so on.
If Obama manages to destroy Romney, he will receive all the votes left of Line 2. That is, Obama gets some more votes, that might be just the ones he needs. If Obama didn’t destroy Romney, he will receive votes left of Line 1. At least he has weakened Romney early on.
Thank God, Obama didn’t really work this way, and it’s too late to do anything about it.

When I see “address a mass audience at such a high level” and “Colorado” in the same article, I half-expect to see something like “9,300 feet above sea level” in the next sentence. Glad to see Ryan running the platitudes out of politicking.

As a Catholic in NY, with LDS relatives in CA, I don’t think Catholics care one way or another about Mormons (even if the Pope doesn’t honor Mormon baptisms). But churchgoing Catholics are very upset at how Obama has given their church the back of his hand. Outside CA and the SW, most Catholics are ethnic conservative to moderate Democrats, even Reagan Democrats. R&R should do very well with them.

ex-catholic, myself from nj.
I lack the mormon relatives, but share in your opinion that, for the most part, catholics don’t care.

we are talking almost 35 million voters in 2008, though.
and the shift from 2004 to 2008 is only a small portion…
per cnn demographics-
04, bush…17 million. kerry…15.36 million.
08, mccain…15.73 million. obama 18.88 million.

totally agree that obama has been puttting a stick in the eye of religion in general, and catholics-because of their direct role in healthcare-specifically.

very hard to seperate this from the fact that paul ryan WILL have an effect on the catholic vote.

I live in Wisconsin (not a native or in Ryan’s district) but have followed Ryan for some time. In my view, Romney’s selection of Ryan was a true stroke of genius. The man is extraordinarily knowledgeable, grounded and articulate. He will be a major positive asset to the Romney campaign and those Republicans in D.C. who doubt his ability to attract votes will learn something. Ryan has at least 10 I.Q. points on Obama and 20 on Biden. He is probably up a few on Romney, too, and I know about these matters.

Biden is dumber than a box of rocks. Not only did he get caught plagerizing in the 88 campaign, he got nailed for it at Syracuse Law School and had to beg not to be tossed out of school. Attribution and citation are basic fundamentals that get drilled into you in law school. Biden flunked application of those basics in a writing exercise. His recidivism in 1988 shows just how dense he really is. He graduated 63rd in a class of 65.

Biden is the Colonel Klink of American politics. Ryan has him by at least 35 points. Biden managed 3 gaffes in one speech yesterday in Virginia. He missidentified where he was and who his audience was, and he made a racially tinged comment in front of a heavily minority crowd about Republicans putting them back in chains. Hey, A$$ Hat! Republicans liberated the slaves, it was the Dems who ran the Jim Crow south and have consigned entire generations of Black Americans to welfare dependency.

It’s long since passed the time to stop letting these lefty bigots, personified by the dim bulb Joe Biden, have a pass for their own racism and stupidity.

Some people are too self conscious to brag about their own achievements. Another eg. HW Bush was called a “wimp” by the media when he was the youngest Navy flier who had flown numerous missions, yet a draft dodger was their hero for getting a blow job in the WH.

Good points. I have a very raw nerve about how Bush 41 was portrayed as a wimp by worthless scrubs like Garry Trudeau. Regardless of his faults vis-a-vis the philosophy of Hayek and Burke, no one who dives his plane down into the teeth of AA fire and gets shot down for his trouble is a wimp.

The truth will always electrify. And the truth teller will provide the energy. I thank whatever divine providence has placed this young man in this moment at this time when America is beginning to falter. God give him the strength to carry on.

It’s not all that long ago that politicians actually made arguments in their speeches. JFK, FDR, Goldwater. Go farther back and read Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address or Second Inaugural. Pols used to treat the voters as adults, then they stopped, maybe it was the electronic media needing 10-second soundbites, or the professional consultants telling the candidates to not risk actually saying anything–I don’t know the cause, but if the pols treat people with a litle respect it may go a long way to earning them respect (and votes) in return. Looks like this campaign will be a good experiment, one side (D) is all demagoguery and lies, supported and amplified by the media, the other side (R) will be trying to advance arguments (about which you may agree or disagree, but still, arguments) with the media trying to ignore them.

What gives me hope is Ryan’s vitality. His energy is formidable, steamroller-quality, and given his youth and fitness he’s likely to keep it for a couple of decades. A Ryan Administration would possess force and focus we haven’t seen since Reagan.

Ryan and Romeny will elevate the substance of this debate for sure. They do NEED however to coordinate their messages going forward because if they don’t the media will use this to confuse and confound the citizens. A good example is the differences between the Ryan Budget and Romney’s plans for medicare reform. Another is the “energy discussion” when Paul Ryan said he favors an “all of the above” approach. Sorry as taxpayers we are tired of flushing good money down the windmill and solar rat hole. These differences are not life threatening to the campaign at the moment but the differences need to be ironed out ASAP or the MSM will make their biased attempts to sow more seeds of discord within the RNC and their base. The good news is that conservatives and republicans are not running a timid and hide from your shadow campaign but rather are appealing to right thinking patriotic common sense Americans that it is time to step up and do the right thing. These problems can be solved but time IS running out!!

“Another is the “energy discussion” when Paul Ryan said he favors an “all of the above” approach”

I might be expounding on what youre already saying, but that quote is no liability or conflict between them….I dont mind an “all of the above” energy approach, as long as we dont have an F.B.F.T. (Federal Boondoggle Feed Trough) everywhere. If a candidate can make THAT distinction, and defuse the medias “the Republican guys aint even on the same page” meme, then its all good.

I’m OK with any supplementary power sources that are viable and cost-effective being, *ahem*, “encouraged”, perhaps with MODEST tax incentives for private manufacturers and technology developers. Like, maybe with a slight drop in the Capital Gains Rate on investments in “energy technology”? Like, maybe with a slight cut in the Corporate Tax Rate of such companies? You’re not handing out other peoples money that way, because the government never “pays” for a tax cut. They just let the owners of the money keep a little more than before….No one loses in that game, and we might actually get somewhere with real energy technology gains.

But the current system of straight up paying people to grow corn nobody otherwise wants, and mandating manufacture of expensive ethanol (at huge net loss) because there is NO MARKET for it, is total freaking nonsense. Never mind just dumping tons of money into a solar plant…Let THEM risk THEIR OWN money, just let the chance of keeping more of THEIR OWN PROFIT be the carrot.

Make sure Ryans energy policy is “all of the above…that make financial and engineering sense without bankrupting the taxpayers for no useful gain”

Then its never in conflict with “drill baby drill” or “stop all ethanol, wind, solar and bio subsidies”

I know, I know, its not a sound bite, it takes actual THINKING to digest that.

Wow . This US election is shaping up to be the entertainment highlight of the decade. I am going to have to stock up on popcorn. I do not have a horse in this race obviously but from my perch this Ryan fellow should be president not vice-president. However other than conservative blogs and Fox I do not see any positive coverage of the Republican side. My suspicion is that Obama (peace be upon him) will win since the majority of the populace will either not follow the issues and debates or will swallow the biased coverage. This is a concern to me as US issues have a lot of influence on events in Canada.

I think the news coverage is starting to shift. The first articles were probably already written when Ryan was chosen, and predictably held up the liberal narrative with wide-ranging attacks. However, now that the facts are starting to come out on Ryan, including the fact that most senior citizens SUPPORT his plan for Medicare and that he’s drawing record-breaking crowds, the reporting seems to be changing. It’s as if the media is actually taking time to evaluate him and he’s not the fiscal bogey man at all. Just a smart young guy with a plan.

WHOA! I’d only thought about A.B.O. until Ryan, but you bring up an excellent point. Elect a couple of adults, work hard on getting responsible adults in Congress, and we could be looking at a long term game change!

People KNOW Medicare, Social Security, the national deficit and debt are all creating a perilous future for every single one of us, yet Congress continues to fiddle away with petty infighting while Rome burns. Ryan has the guts to come up with a plan. That alone shows he’s serious and thoughtful and willing to put the needs of the country before his own instead of just being another congressman with an eye on re-election in a congress whose popularity has reached an all-time low with the American public.

And they are NOT ready to become Europe and are NOT ready to cede the American dream to China. Americans are still Americans after all, and regardless of color or socioeconomic class they want to prosper and (perhaps more importantly) see their children prosper, too. They realize that government, while necessary and important, is more of an impediment than a benefit at this point in time; and they see the incredible waste of their tax dollars at every turn.

Romney intuitively understands these things about the American people; Ryan gives him the ability to solidify that nebulous knowledge and turn it into a real product the people can get their hearts, heads and hands around. In these uncertain times when we all feel the ground shifting beneath our feet, it’s hard to underestimate the attraction of having a foundation.

I find a lot to like about Ryan, even though his budget proposal left defense spending untouched. In a time of annual trillion dollar federal deficits in D.C., the country can afford neither the massive entitlements we have nor a gold plated military.

For those outside of Colorado who think that this state will now automatically fall into the Republican column via Ryan’s selection……….like the old HBO show, “curb your enthusiasm.” Republicans have some down ticket issues here that may drag the entire ticket down.

A big problem is that the “bedroom police” are back with another try at passing a “personhood amendment” to the state constitution. Lost 73-27% in 2008 and 70-30% in 2010. Now we’re seeing Repub congressional candidates backing away from past support of personhood (Cory Gardner, HD 4; Mike Coffman, HD 6; Joe Coors, HD 7). Two sitting Republican congressmen (Coffman, and Tipton, HD 3) are in tight races due to re-districting and really don’t need this mill-stone to be hung around their necks.

One disturbing item about Ryan is that he was a co-sponsor for what has been called the mandatory ultrasound bill. If passed, would require that a woman seeking an abortion would have to get a mandatory ultrasound, regardless of whether the woman & her family want it or her doctor doesn’t think it’s needed. That sort of “big government in your face” doesn’t play well here in Colorado.

Colorado state House is likely to go back to the Dems; they need just one seat to re-take & will retain the state Senate; thanks to a civil unions bill that the House Repub leadership bungled & royally fouled up. In addition, several reasonable Repub state legislators lost in the primary to far right candidates, which now allows Dems to paint them as “too extreme for Colorado.”

All in all, I think Colorado; with 9 electoral votes; remains up for grabs in November despite Ryan being the Repub v-p candidate.

Moronic. Abortion, which appears to be the one and only thing liberals will go to the mattresses for, does not happen in the bedroom. It happens in an abortion mill. The notion that an innocent third party — an unborn baby — should be consigned to a macerator because two supposed adults were unwilling to take cheap, simple precautions is the quintessence of evil.

Just in case you’ve spent the last fifty years in a coma, we have quite a number of inexpensive, easy-to-use contraceptive methods available today. There’s absolutely no reason a sex act must eventuate in pregnancy. But liberals will trumpet that “bedroom police” nonsense at the drop of a feather.

Really, Francis? We’ve had this discussion before. You equate support for abortion rights as a “liberal” issue. I gave you a quote 1+ years ago from the acknowledged founder of the modern conservative movement, the late Senator Barry Goldwater……..”abortion is not a conservative issue; it’s a matter between a woman and her doctor.”

Your response was that Goldwater was wrong. I then visited your blog. Obviously, you feel strongly about abortion as a religious issue. Goldwater didn’t share your religious views and neither do I. As for availability of contraception, the Colorado personhood proposal, if passed, would ban certain forms of birth control. In addition, various religious right groups actively work to limit access to contraception. I wasn’t in a coma during the Republican primary season; but maybe you missed the thoughts on contraception from Rick Santorum.

My point remains the same: the Dems will inject Ryan’s religious views into the campaign (he’s also sponsored a national “personhood” bill). And given the history here in Colorado; we’re basically a “live and let live” type of state; those religious views may be a big drag on Republican candidates. Those views cost us Repubs a US Senate seat in 2010.

Its not (necessarily) a religious view, it’s simply a moral view…and true, a few Conservatives have fallen into the trap before, and will I’m sure again..

But everyone agrees it is PREDOMINANTLY a Liberal verses Conservative argument, and the basic immorality of Abortion a Liberal must defend is:

Why does one who arrived full term to enjoy their life as best they can, feel its appropriate to deny THE VERY SAME to their own child?

If you truly believe YOUR body is absolutely sacred and inviolable, 100% secure from the approach of any other entity or interference, then WHEN exactly did YOUR body became YOURS?

Its just a level of “me first” selfishness that’s unseemly and indefensible. Everyone knows where life begins, everyone knows a pregnancy is not a disease, its another human life evolving the same way all of us have.

Liberals are historically the “party of party” and not the party of Responsibility. They are the takers, not the producers. They typically will “serve the republic” as a Tenured Teachers Union Employee, working 180 days a year, seldom ever as a 24/7/365 Soldier or Marine in actual harms way

Drunken, drugged up and irresponsible recreational sex is their calling card, and ONE PARTY continuously promises them the ultimate antidote, and is now even getting others to pay for it.

No one with a straight face can say 99.999% of all abortions ARENT purely elective and unnecessary for any real medical reason. No one with a straight face can tell me live, full term children ARENT being routinely killed for the same convenience.

I’m in Philly… A nice, Liberal Democratic Stronghold of zero responsibility or discipline, fiscal, moral or otherwise….and filthy abortion mills that kill live, full term child are common enough to be chiche anymore…watch the local news when the next one is “discovered” with full term children, umbilicals attached, in garbage cans…thats what abortion is.

And it is, because liberals only go one way. Give me birth control, I want the fun but not the responsibility. You can pay for it now, too, I cant be bothered. My money is for fun, you can pay for my “responsibilities”

And if and when that “99% effective” contraceptives you provided me with fail (like, the 101st time I have sex?) then the baby will pay, with THEIR life, because mine is too fun and important to be interrupted by someone elses needs.

Oh, and “giving it up” for adoption wont work either….it just re-enforces the spectacle of my selfishness, me walking away from a child, so I cant do that. Just kill it so I can keep having fun, and wrap it up in some flowery language about “freedom” to assuage my guilt.

Call me a hero or something, because being SO FREAKING SELFISH otherwise wears me down and makes me sad.

SteveB, your arguments are not invalid. CO is certainly a battle ground State, one which leans Blue, no doubt. Romney will be lucky to carry it.

Yes, the personhood issue does hurt. Really bad timing. There are always those in either Party who go for the Holy Grail whenever they see a chance, or think they do.

However, I am not sure that an ultrasound requirement is a deal killer. It is simply requiring that the patient gets all the information about having an abortion. Certainly, the abortion places are not all that interested in costing themselves money by talking a woman out of it, right? Consider it to be consumer protection against conflict-of-interest doctors.

The only reason it is being proposed and opposed, is that it really works. When women see the ultrasound, oftentimes, it hits them, and they decide to keep the baby. Nothing wrong with that, either, right? No harm, there. She gets info she did not have to help with her decision. And it is info the doctors were not interested in providing her.

We have all kinds of standards for medicine, some required by government, and others required by the AMA. Shoot, I cannot even get a broken filling replaced without an X-ray, so why not a similar thing for a abortion?

“But, it’s invasive!” An abortion is far more invasive. That argument is ridiculous.

Really, nothing wrong in making sure the patient gets proper information and care. I mean, the goal is not really to promote abortion, right? It’s not “Choice”, if the woman does not have all the info necessary to make that choice, right? It does no harm, and the woman can still make the choice to have an abortion, right?

Yeah, I do not see this as hurting Ryan, unless, of course, it gets misrepresented.

Root: “everyone agrees it is predominantly a liberal vs. conservative argument…..” Really, who is “everyone?” How many millions of citizens have you personally talked to? “Liberals are historically the “party of party” and not the “party of responsibility…..” That’s a laugher. I certainly recall a lot of partying being done in my college Young Republicans group when I was in college. “No one with a straight face can say that 99.999% of all abortions aren’t purely elective and unnecessary……” And you’ve interviewed every woman, and her family, who has had an abortion over what time period???

“It’s a moral view, and liberals have no morals…..” You’re entitled to your religious opinions. See the link below for the religious background of the personhood movement.

Yes, Francis, I did read your link. Here’s one for you. Dr. Diana Hsieh is married to Dr. Paul Hsieh, an occasional blogger here on PJ Media. Both authors are from Colorado.

Marc Malone: “It is simply requiring that the patient gets all the information……” Meaning that a woman isn’t intelligent enough to make this type of decision on her own, with her family & her doctor. Big government must intervene?

Ryan’s positions are pretty clear; little chance of being mis-represented. Whether it hurts the ticket or not; Romney takes the same views now; remains to be seen.

Marc Malone: “It is simply requiring that the patient gets all the information……” Meaning that a woman isn’t intelligent enough to make this type of decision on her own, with her family & her doctor. Big government must intervene?

Ryan’s positions are pretty clear; little chance of being mis-represented. Whether it hurts the ticket or not; Romney takes the same views now; remains to be seen.

So? An ultrasound is a non-invasive, non-injurious procedure. Though I have qualms about mandating any medical procedure at any time, the law already does so in numerous other cases– e.g., juvenile vaccinations, blood tests a requirement for marriage licenses, various “public health” regulations — so I’m inclined to shrug.

On the other hand, I have strong qualms about a woman murdering her unborn baby without at least looking at his shadow first.
It strikes me that if you’re going to kill something, even a rightless animal, you ought to face it squarely first. Liberals, being wholly dedicated to the Pursuit Of The Orgasm At All Costs, will disagree.

And you still haven’t established a defensible argument for why opposition to abortion, and a desire to reduce its frequency, makes one a member of the “bedroom police.” My wife got quite a belly laugh out of that, by the way.

Ultrasounds are not necessarily non-invasive. The one proposed in the Virginia bill was invasive, and my understanding, same for Texas.

“Liberals, being wholly dedicated to the pursuit of the orgasm at all costs…..” Now, I’m getting a belly laugh; again remembering the antics of my fellow College Young Republicans way back when.

“Opposition to abortion and reducing its frequency……..” Hopefully you actively oppose efforts by religious right groups & the Catholic Church to reduce availability of contraception. Remember Rick Santorum during the primaries? It’s obvious that you don’t support Roe v. Wade. Do you support Griswold v. Connecticut?

“Defensible argument……” Actually, you have yet to establish one regarding why you oppose the right of women and their families to MAKE THEIR OWN REPRODUCTIVE DECISIONS without interference from big government. Using your argument about mandated government medical procedures, should men have to get government approval to have vasectomies? After all, the procedure interferes with a male’s ability to reproduce.

Amazing that a Durango couple made the 6-hour trek to hear a conservative in liberal outpost, Denver. Durango was once ranch-country conservative, but it’s filling up with year-round on-the-dole hippie skiers living in shelters and shopping in thrift stores. I’m hoping that Durango couple came home and spread the good news about our next VP.

The USA is going to need level headed, no nonsense leaders for the next 20 years to fix the mess that the skirt chasing, communist democrats caused. I think as always, it will take a generation to fix.