Montana Wildlands needs protection

Wilderness and wildlife define the character of Montana. If you were to ask people what comes to mind when you mention Montana, they are likely to say Glacier, Yellowstone, Bob Marshall Wilderness, Absaroka Beartooth Wilderness, charismatic wildlife like grizzlies and wolves, and trout streams like the Upper Yellowstone or Madison Rivers.

It is beyond comprehension why Senator Daines and Rep. Gianforte would seek to strip Wilderness Study Area (WSA) status from nearly 800,000 acres of Montana’s most enchanting landscapes. Not only is this going to harm Montana’s economy, but it will reduce the special features that make Montana unique: it’s wild country.

These lands are the heart and soul of Montana. Places like the Big Snowies WSA by Lewistown, Blue Joint WSA by Darby, Sapphire Mountains WSA near Missoula, Middle Fork of the Judith WSA by Great Falls, Terry Badlands WSA by Terry, Pryor Mountains WSA south of Billings, Bitter Creek WSA by Glasgow, Cow Creek WSA by Fort Benton, Ruby Mountains WSA by Dillon, Humbug Spires WSA by Butte, among others.

Indeed, nearly every Montana community has a WSA in the neighborhood.

These places represent the best features of Montana and if you live near any of these places, you understand how fortunate you are.

Numerous studies have documented that counties with protected landscapes tend to have higher employment, higher wages, and overall better infrastructure than similar counties without such landscapes.

It’s well established that people choose to live in places with opportunities to visit protected areas. Footloose individuals move to communities near protected landscapes, bringing with them income earned elsewhere but spending it locally.

But it goes beyond economics or whether someone uses these places. These wildlands become part of the local identity. People like to know such untrammeled place exist even if they only go to the edge and gaze upon the beautiful landscapes. They are places where we look out on an expanse of undeveloped land and breathe in the spaciousness.

Protecting Wilderness is one of the “best” attributes of humanity. It demonstrates a respect for all life, and a willingness to share the Earth with others.

Now Montanans have a chance to demonstrate our own best character defined by restraint and humility by supporting the continued protection of these lands as wild places.

2 Responses to Montana Wildlands needs protection

Ever since the Reagan/Watt administration the republican goal has been to make public lands available for resource extraction. The republicans decided to attempt to coerce their own scientists into going along and if that didn’t work they simply ignored the science and went ahead anyway. The Trump administration was even bolder in publicizing its disdain for science. The republican machine is feeding on campaign contributions from corporate resource users so any designation on public lands that stands in the way will be eliminated.

This is a very bad time for public land because tremendous damage is being done and it will take a very long time for the various ecosystems to mend if they ever get the chance. The only way left to rejuvenate some of the habitat is to eliminate livestock use and commercial logging and mineral extraction. Corporate resource users and livestock lessees have gotten a free ride at the expense of the tax payer and the land for too long.

There is a kind of hypocrisy imbedded in the republican ranks that is leading the U.S. into bankruptcy -both politically, socially, economically and environmentally.

Calendar

Quote

‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."