I believe my opponent does not know what an algorithm is. He has shown over a period of time to make his arguments based off of semantics and trollery. He appears in no way to be serious or to have any true desire to be on this site, so why would he bother to research algorithms or what they are. I can guarantee with 100% certainty his next response will be a bunch of nonsensical garbled language and will in no way offer any arguments or rebuttals that remotely relate to the topic at hand.

Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to prove that he knew what an algorithm is, point goes to con for convincing arguments. Pro refused to take the debate seriously, conduct goes to con. Pro can't seem to spell and use proper grammar, point goes to con.

Reasons for voting decision: The pro did not provide any valid argument in the first round. And in the second round either. The pro's debates are just like said by con are a garbled language. And makes no sense and the Con had a bit of sense in his argument.

Reasons for voting decision: Pro has the burden of proof to show that he knows what an algorithm is. Granted that he cannot spell it correctly, nor did he do anything to demonstrate that he knows what it is, the vote goes to con.

You are not eligible to vote on this debate

This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.