Continental Introduction

Looking at a map (Figures 1.1, 1.2, 2.1), South America hangs heavily from the narrow, funnel-like Isthmus of Panama, which thus serves to delimit the continent on the north. Indeed, it was through Panama’s densely vegetated tropical environment that the first settlers of the vacant (in human terms) continent had to pass, and adapt, more than ten thousand years ago (Ranere and Cooke 2003); maritime movement hugging the coastline was also a possibility (Fladmark 1979). Oceans border South America on all sides, further defining and, until the age of European exploration, largely isolating it from the rest of the world, save for intrepid indigenous navigators who trafficked luxury goods, including Spondylus shell, between Ecuador and the west coast of Mexico (Marcos 1977–78) and Panamanian chiefs who pursued esoteric knowledge in the more complex chiefdom societies of northern Colombia (Helms 1976). But this hyper-geographical continental essence—or South America as a natural unit—is belied by what may have been the world’s greatest linguistic, cultural, and botanical diversity. This extraordinary heterogeneity is the challenge that faced Julian H. Steward (Figure 1.3) in the early 1940s as he sought to devise a framework with which to organize the approximately two hundred chapters commissioned for the six-volume Handbook of South American Indians (HSAI; the seventh volume is the index) from an international cast of more than ninety leading ethnographers, archaeologists, physical anthropologists, ethnologists, linguists, cultural geographers and art historians.

In this introduction to the Handbook of South American Archaeology (HSAA), I consider Steward’s organization of the HSAI and some of the continental schemes that followed it. I do not discuss exclusively ethnographic volumes (e.g., Gross 1973; Lyons 1974). I conclude with comments on a new critical scholarship for supra-area archaeology.

Keywords

Culture Area Smithsonian Institution American Archaeology World Archaeological Social Science Research Council

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Dillehay, Tom D., 2001, Town and country in late Moche times: a view from two northern valleys. In Moche Art and Archaeology in Ancient Peru, edited by Joanne Pillsbury, pp. 259–283. National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Hamilakis, Yannis, 2005, Whose world and whose archaeology: the colonial present and the return of the political. Archaeologies. Journal of the World Archaeological Congress 1 (2): 94–101.Google Scholar

Johnson, Allen W. and Timothy Earle, 1987, The Evolution of Human Societies. From Foraging Group to Agrarian State. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar

Joyce, Thomas A., 1912, South American Archaeology. An Introduction to the Archaeology of the South American Continent With Special Reference to the Early History of Peru. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York.Google Scholar

Lathrap, Donald W., 1973, The antiquity and importance of long-distance trade relationships in the moist tropics of pre-Columbian South America. World Archaeology 5 (2): 170–186.Google Scholar

Lathrap, Donald W., 1974, The moist tropics, the arid lands, and the appearance of great art styles in the New World. In Art and Environment in Native America, edited by Mary Elizabeth King and Idris B. Traylor, pp. 115–158. Special Publications, No. 7. Museum of Texas Tech University, Lubbock.Google Scholar

Lathrap, Donald W., 1985, Jaws: the control of power in the early Nuclear American ceremonial center. In Early Ceremonial Architecture in the Andes, edited by Christopher B. Donnan, pp. 241–267. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Lekson, Stephen H. and Peter N. Peregrine, 2004, A continental perspective for North American archaeology. The SAA Archaeological Record 4 (1): 15–19. Society for American Archaeology.Google Scholar

López Mazz, José M., 1999, Some aspects of the French influence upon Uruguayan and Brazilian archaeology. In Archaeology in Latin America, edited by Gustavo G. Politis and Benjamin Alberti, pp. 38–58. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar

Lowenthal, David, 1994, Conclusion: archaeologists and others. In The Politics of the Past, edited by Peter Gathercole and David Lowenthal, pp. 302–314. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar

Mamani Condori, Carlos, 1989, History and prehistory in Bolivia: what about the Indians? In Conflict in the Archaeology of Living Traditions, edited by Robert Layton, pp. 46–59. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar

Marcos, Jorge, 1977–78, Cruising to Acapulco and back with the Thorny Oyster set: a model for lineal exchange systems. Journal of the Steward Anthropological Society 9 (1–2): 99–132.Google Scholar

Patterson, Thomas C., 1989, Political economy and a discourse called ‘Peruvian archaeology’. Culture and History 4: 35–64.Google Scholar

Patterson, Thomas C., 1995, Archaeology, history, indigenismo, and the state in Peru and Mexico. In Making Alternative Histories. The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings, edited by Peter R. Schmidt and Thomas C. Patterson, pp. 69–85. School of American Research, Santa Fe.Google Scholar

Ranere, Anthony J. and Richard G. Cooke, 2003, Late Glacial and Early Holocene occupation of Central American tropical forests. In Under the Canopy. The Archaeology of Tropical Rain Forests, edited by Julio Mercader, pp. 219–248. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.Google Scholar

Steward, Julian H., 1948d, A functional-developmental classification of American high cultures. In A Reappraisal of Peruvian Archaeology, edited by Wendell C. Bennett, pp. 103–104. Memoir 4. Society for American Archaeology, Menasha.Google Scholar

Steward, Julian H., 1949a, South American cultures: an interpretative summary. In Handbook of South American Indians, Vol. V, The Comparative Anthropology of South American Indians, edited by Julian H. Steward, pp. 669–772. Bulletin 143. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Steward, Julian H., 1949b, Development of complex societies: cultural causality and law: a trial formulation of the development of early civilizations. American Anthropologist 51 (1): 1–27. (reprinted in 1955 in Theory of Culture Change. The Methodology of Multilinear Evolution by Julian H. Steward, pp. 178–209. University of Illinois Press, Urbana) [Steward 1955a]Google Scholar

Steward, Julian H., 1950, Area Research. Social Science Research Council, New York.Google Scholar

Steward, Julian H., 1960b, Some implications of the symposium. In The Irrigation Civilizations: A Symposium on Method and Result in Cross-Cultural Regularities, by Julian H. Steward et al., pp. 58–78. Pan American Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Thomas, Brian W., 2001, African-American tradition and community in the Antebellum South. In The Archaeology of Tradition. Agency and History Before and After Columbus, edited by Timothy R. Pauketat, pp. 16–33. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar

Vargas Arena, Iraida and Mario Sanoja, 1999, Archaeology as a social science. Its expression in Latin America. In Archaeology in Latin America, edited by Gustavo G. Politis and Benjamin Alberti, pp. 59–75. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar

Webbink, Paul, 1950, Foreword. In Area Research by Julian Steward, pp. vii–ix. Social Science Research Council, New York.Google Scholar