Pages

Dec 7, 2015

Christmas Land Is Our Nation

So let us state what is true. God
reveals Himself to us through the intimate, mysterious human
relationships we form with our kith and kin. The moral beauty of the
European hearth, where our kith and kin dwell, points us to the Star of
Bethlehem. The moral depravity of the syncretic religion of rationalism
and diversity points us toward the kingdom of Satan. The most
counter-revolutionary thing that a European man can do is to refuse to
bend his knee to the new diversity of races and faiths. Such a refusal
will make the European man a sign of contradiction to Satan and his
minions. And such is the European man’s destiny. He was born to bear
witness, through his fidelity to the European hearth, to the Lamb of God
who taketh away the sin of the world. – CWNY

Robert Lewis Dear certainly does not look like a hero of a romance.
And I can’t, with complete certainty, assert that he is one, because I
know nothing about his motivation for shooting the two Planned
Parenthood employees and the police officer. But if his intent was to
strike a blow for the slaughtered innocents of our nation by striking
home against the butchers of Planned Parenthood, then I heartily support
him. The Planned Parenthood organization is one of the great satanic
bastions of liberalism, and whoever attacks that organization should be
lauded by all Christian Europeans. True romance often seems rather
uncouth and gritty at its inception:

Dickson groaned. What had become of his dream of
idylls, his gentle bookish romance? Vanished before a reality which
smacked horribly of crude melodrama and possibly of sordid crime. His
gorge rose at the picture, but a thought troubled him. Perhaps all
romance in its hour of happening was rough and ugly like this, and only
shone rosy in the retrospect. Was he being false to his deepest faith? –
Buchan (1)

You don’t want to be (at least I hope you don’t) like the Fox News
people who worship the fighting man simply because he is a fighting man.
A soldier or a policemen is not absolved from the responsibility of
making sure that what he fights for is something worthy of fighting for.
It’s a tragedy that the police officer had to die, but his death cannot
be laid at the doorstep of Robert Lewis Dear. The police officer did
not have to – indeed, he should not have – come to the aid of the baby
killers. No white man should sign up to protect and serve the butchers
who work for Planned Parenthood, whose mantra is, “First we kill the
babies, then we dissect them and sell their body parts.”

Any attempt to actually fight, in the fullest sense of the word, the
forces of Liberaldom – whether the fight is against the abortionists,
the Aztecs and black barbarians who rape and murder whites, or the
Moslem invaders – always leads to the liberals joining with their
clerical allies to condemn violence. It is un-Christian, they tell us.
Shouldn’t that give a man who calls himself a Christian reason to pause
and question the rightness of a fighting faith? How can he be right when
the vast majority of professed Christians are against him? No, it
should not give him pause. First, the right or wrong of any action
cannot be determined by majority vote. And secondly, the white Christian
who wants to fight back against the forces of Liberaldom is not in the
minority if you allow our honored dead a voice. Do you think our
European ancestors would have permitted the slaughter of babies in the
womb, the murderous onslaught of the colored barbarians, or the
Islamization of Christian Europe? No, they would not, so you must
condemn your Christian European progenitors if you want to condemn the
contemporary European who wants to follow the path of his fighting
ancestors. But of course the modern church men do condemn their violent,
racist, moribund, Christian ancestors. Imagine being so simple that you
see an evil and immediately want to strike out against that evil. The
condemnation of the “simple-minded” faith of the evil whites of old
Europe has resulted in the slaughter of the innocents, the unrelenting
murder of whites by colored barbarians, and the surrender of the
European people to Islam.

Let us never forget when the liberals condemn any violence directed
against them or their colored gods that the liberals are the most
violent people on the face of the earth. They hire state executioners to
kill babies, and they systematically disarm white people while
encouraging the colored tribesmen and the Moslems to slaughter whites.
The liberals are like the head gangster in the old movies, who
fastidiously leaves the room before his mugs begin to torture the hero,
because he claims his nonviolent principles forbid him to watch the
torture he has just ordered to be done. The liberals have ordered the
death of whites and the slaughter of the innocents, but they reserve the
right to wear the cloak of sanctity while their henchmen do the actual
killings and torture.

Such thoughts are not very Christmas-y, are they? (2)
I wonder. Every single blessing in this world, and all our hopes for a
blessing in the next, have come about because of the incarnation of
Jesus Christ. So maybe it is quite in keeping with the
Christmas spirit to attack the great haters of the blessed event in
Bethlehem – those who hate so much that they must arrogate for
themselves the power to destroy the life of the babe in the womb and the
power to eradicate the Christ-bearing race from the face of the earth.

In the 1820’s Washington Irving wrote down his impressions of a
Christmas celebration that he witnessed as a guest in an English manor
house. Irving, like P. G. Wodehouse after him, never professed to be a
Shakespearean diver into the depths of the human heart. He was a
humorist with modest goals:

What, after all, is the mite of wisdom that I could
throw into the mass of knowledge; or how am I sure that my sagest
deductions may be safe guides for the opinions of others? But in writing
to amuse, if I fail, the only evil is my own disappointment. If,
however, I can by any lucky chance, in these days of evil, rub out one
wrinkle from the brow of care, or beguile the heavy heart of one moment
of sorrow; if I can now and then penetrate through the gathering film of
misanthropy, prompt a benevolent view of human nature, and make my
reader more in good humour with his fellow beings and himself, surely,
surely, I shall not then have written entirely in vain. – Old Christmas

But in seeking to amuse Irving does reveal to us something quite
profound. The old Baron and his family, the poor relations, the workers
on the Baron’s estate, and the community at large are all united in one
common goal – to celebrate the birth of Christ, their common hope. They
are not a racially diverse group, which might account for the fact that
their faith and their joy is not feigned, it is something in the blood,
which our modern Europeans who are bloodless shadows of men and women
can never feel. This is more than a pity, it is a tragedy that the
Europeans have traded their provincial “racist” faith in our Blessed
Savior for a cosmic faith in nature and nature’s god, the negro.
Sometimes, late at night, they look back and feel a twinge of remorse.
That is one of the reasons the liberals dare not look with a sympathetic
eye at their European past. When they do, they feel like outsiders at a
great celebration they cannot enter into, because they can’t understand
why the celebrants are celebrating.

As the Moslems invade Europe, as the colored barbarians grow
increasingly violent and hostile to all things white and Christian, and
as the liberals prepare for the final satanic assault on the white race,
it is hard to celebrate Christmas, because the Christian community, the
European Christian community, has dwindled down to a precious few. If
you go to church you will be told of the greatness of the negro and the
evil of the white man. If you go out into the community at large you
will find diversity of races and diversity of faiths. I take heart in
Burke’s affirmation that a nation is a moral essence. We want the
European lands to be one, white, and Christian, but if they are not, if
they remain the home of heathens, colored barbarians, and liberals, they
are not our nations. Europe is Christmas land; I can’t think of any
European nation apart from that nation’s Christian past. If England,
France, or any other European nation ceases to be one, Christian, and
white, they will cease to be England, France, etc. Those nations will
only exist where men are white and Christian. Burke likens Jacobin
France to a house where robbers have broken in and dispossessed the
homeowners. The real home exists wherever the former homeowners go,
because robbers cannot be homeowners anymore than a coalition of
Moslems, liberals, and colored barbarians can be a nation just because
they occupy a geographic land mass in Europe. The moral essence of every
European country will always remain white and Christian. Wherever that
moral essence is, there are the nations of Europe.

In the early 20th century it became commonplace amongst
European scholars to look down on the European people from their
Olympian height and condemn all of the Europeans’ history as one
colossal pageant of war and depravity. But is that how God, who is not
an Olympian, sees our history? Doesn’t He who sees quite through the
deeds of men see something else, something besides war and depravity? I
think He does. He sees that the Europeans, responding to God’s grace,
built another land within the land of sin, which the Olympian scholars,
incorrectly, saw as Europe in its entirety. The antique Europeans built
what the little children in the movie The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm called
“Christmas Land.” Such a land cannot be seen with the outer eye of the
Christian utopians. It can only be seen by the inner eye of love. Could
any marriage survive if the wife saw only the faults of her husband but
none of his virtues? I know mine couldn’t. The Christian scholars who
tell us that there never has been a Christian Europe because the
Christian Europeans were such incredible sinners, have no eyes to see
with; they have separated their heart from their head and see only with
the mind’s eye, not the heart’s eye. “Verily I say unto you, Except ye
be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter the
kingdom of heaven.”

My heart and my sword as well is with those inhabitants of that old
English manor house – those Europeans who still believe in Christmas
land. That is the white man’s homeland.

Notes:(1) No doubt Robert Lewis Dear is
insane, but is not his insanity a type of divine insanity that is
necessary to counter the liberals’ satanic insanity? God forbid that we
should, even for one moment, forget that the liberals are the devil’s
own, driven by a satanic desire to destroy the image of God in man.

(2) In old Europe when the European
nations were fighting (alas) with each other, there were Christmas
truces. But there is no Christmas truce in Liberaldom. In fact the
liberals step up their assault on the European people during Christmas.
They launch a series of propaganda attacks, in film and print, the theme
of which is, in the main, that our incarnate Lord was not the Son of
God, He was only a forerunner of the Atticus Finch liberal. So long as
Liberaldom stands, the Christmas season must always be a time of war as
well as a time of peace for the reason that the enemy is attacking
whites precisely because they are the Christmas people.

In the massacre in California that
took place several days ago, the Jihadists chose a Christmas party as
the setting for their massacre. And please note the difference between
the justified assault on Planned Parenthood and the unjustified assault
on the Christmas people. The former attack was condemned and used as an
occasion to demand that whites disarm themselves. The latter attack was
an occasion to scold whites about the dangers of blaming all Moslems for
the bad actions of a few Moslems.

Every time Moslems strike, a host of
terrorist “experts” come on the news and tell us what must be done. One
expert’s advice was to “look people in the eye as you go about your
daily business.” By looking people in the eye, the expert claimed, you
can tell if they are terrorists. Well, even if such a process worked,
what could you do if you ascertained they were terrorists, since our
government has made it illegal to carry firearms in the areas where
terrorists strike the most? The really practical and moral policy to
prevent street and terrorist crimes would be to evict all Moslems,
blacks, and Mexicans from the European nations. But if you are not going
to do that, the next best policy would be to arm every white, not to
disarm them. If whites are to be ducks in a shooting gallery, shouldn’t
the ducks have the right to shoot back? Of course such a sane policy
will never be adopted, because liberals are not about to arm their
enemies. Which brings us back to the main point – the liberals hate the
white, Christ-bearing race. They only want the military and the police
to be armed, because the police and the military work for them. The
reason they come down so hard on police officers who shoot black
barbarians is because they want to send a message to the rest of the
white police officers: There are no black, Mexican, or Moslem criminals,
there are only white criminals. When liberals achieve their perfect
world, only whites will be subject to punishment, for the crime of being
white, which is the ultimate crime in Liberaldom.