San Francisco Hates Jews

At the risk of providing TMI, I’m clipped. Aside from my violent temper when I was a kid, and starting drinking and smoking at a young age, I have suffered no ill effects of circumcision.

Now the city that has a police task force that monitors minority renters, forbids you denying access to your trash from wild animals, hates everyone who drives a car (Priis don’t count as cars), hates children so much they ban their toys, and hates the military wants to ban the practice of circumcision.

Why?

They claim it’s to protect children, but I think it has more to do with the Torah’s stance on homosexuality. Then again, it could just be that San Francisco is plain nuts (no pun intended).

A ban on circumcision could end up on San Francisco’s November ballot.

A voter in the city says he will submit more than 12,000 valid signatures to the elections office today. That’s more than the 7,200 needed to get the measure on the ballot.

The proposed new law would make it a misdemeanor to circumcise a person before they are 18-years-old.

It’s usually right about now some simpleton tries to justify their position by illustrating another, equally moronic, position.

“We don’t come at this from a religious angle,” Lloyd Schofield told the San Francisco Examiner. “We feel this is a very harmful thing. Parents are guardians. They are not owners of children. It’s a felony to tattoo a child.”

Told you.

Tattooing a child doesn’t fit felonious behavior in my opinion, but it’s a lot worse than circumcision. A tattoo may adversely affect the child’s health, and future prospects. Not to mention it’s a prolonged ordeal. Circumcision does none of that, and it has been shown to help personal hygiene.

Let’s just call this what it is … racism. We always told our audience to yell something even more absurd at liberals than false allegations of racism. We told you all to ask them why they want to punch babies. Guess they upped the ante those smug bastards.