I had gotten out of bed shortly after 12:00 PM (the clock said 12:08 on this
21st Date of January, 2015), explicitly to look at the time in order to make a
reference of the moment I had become a committed Revolutionist; though I have been,
for some time, involved with the proposals being drawn up involving a Cenocratic
ideal, as an explicit model for restructuring a government in dire need of some
serious revision... which is widely known and agreed upon in many walks of life.
The problem has not been a lack of appreciating this need, but what design should
be projected as a viable candidate to replace the present form of governance, and
the avenue along which it must travel. Needless to say, like all Revolutionary
movements, be it science, art or religion, it is a work in progress. Sometimes such
efforts take one person to begin foraging the trail, at other times it takes the
efforts of several. Intervals of appearance and impact can be just as varied.

While I was tossing and turning, mulling over different considerations involving
the need for the establishment of a New Government, I came to the acknowledged
realization that I am not just a Revolutionist, but a Cenocratic Reform Revolutionist.
In the fullest explication of intimacy, I am now what may be called a "Public Supremacist"...
though I might alternatively be described as a "Publicly Cenocratic Supremacist".
Hail Cenocracy! Hail Government Reform! And it is with some conviction that I note
the existence of others who feel as I do, and are themselves "Public Supremacists",
though they have not as yet come to entitle themselves with such a moniker, nor
make the acknowledgment proudly and publicly portrayed on their personal web page.
When many singular voices speak in unison, it is a voice that shall echo into a
future exceeding the threshold of a thousand, million, billion, and trillions of
years. It is a voice reaching into forever! Forever shall be our reign! Hail our
Cenocracy!

With this in mind, and the consideration for committing these thoughts to a written
form, I lay in bed a while longer before deciding to get up and formerly proclaim, by
way of this documentation, that I have joined the growing ranks of those whom, from
their own vantage points, have come to a similar realization that they too are seeking
government reform for the whole of the public. And though our individual efforts
to date may have been differentially organized according to our personal interests
and experiences, we are nonetheless brethren focused on an overall singular objective.
Each in our own way, have stopped running with the herd mentality as given direction
by the prevailing governance. We have come to rear up our heads and say: Enough!
is Enough! is Enough! Decade after decade We The People have been corralled, chuted,
and made to suffer the ledges and pit-falls of various political round-up excursions
without adequate Representation on our own behalf. We want to head towards a greener
pasture called a Cenocratic formula by the route of a Cenocracy, or present authority,
no matter who or where you are positioned, will be faced with a stampede the likes
of which may well make the American Revolution and Civil War look like a Child's
Birthday party on a Saturday afternoon.

But, it should likewise be stated that the need for a Cenocracy is not about any
one person. It is about all of us. Neither is it about personal gain, though my
experiences in the Cenocratic enterprise has been personally rewarding because I
have always wanted to be involved with that which would lead to the benefit of humanity.
I am tearfully overjoyed by the prospect of finally having found a route into an
unexplored realm which will yield an abundance of resources to be equally shared
by all. I firmly believe that a Cenocracy, with a Cenocratic Formula, will do this.
It is a testimonial that I hope others will come to make in their own way in their
own time. We The People deserve such an opportunity.

Such are the times, such are the thoughts, such is the preparation for a Revolution.

But the character of this Revolutionist consciousness to which I speak, is one
in which I must emphatically state that I am not an Anarchist. I do not believe in
using Anarchy as the primary tool by which progressive government reform should or
must be undertaken. Anarchy is the last resort of desperation when all other efforts
have been exhausted. Indeed, a Revolutionist of sincere conscientiousness must accede to
the rationale of conducting one's intentions as forthrightly as possible. Hence,
I am a "Conservative Radicalist", or stated invertedly like an associative mathematical
algorithm a "Radical Conservatist". These intentions must be made public and
documented for purposes of historical definition and itemization which may later be
used as precedents. Every effort must be made to permit current political leadership
to assist us in our efforts. The beginning of such efforts must publicly state:

WE THE PEOPLEDemand a Cenocracy!

Both the profile and intimate scaffolding of this Cenocracy (New Government)
must be in the prescription of a Cenocratic Formula.

Let such a pronouncement be the preamble to our formal:

Declaration For Greater Independence!

It is an independence from the stultifying effects of a present design of Democracy
where the rights of individuals have become subservient to some supposed over-riding
value of established protocols, processes, procedures, rules, rituals and regulations...
giving rise to the predilection of (elected) officials to presume that they are likewise
anointed with a "Power of Attorney" precedent over our collective Will, to disassemble,
disfigure, or dismiss it according to their own. It is a Democracy that was, in former
years, predicated on the allusive promise of effecting laws which would reflect
the collective Will of the People, through a vicarious form of Representation, in
order to promote the highest ideals of fairness in Equality, Justice and Liberty...
but has now been relegated to the creation and support of interests that are
counter-productive to the public, because they are in fact implemented without our
say-so; like so many publics have had to suffer the consequences thereof.

Because there is no presently practiced or legalized way in which the people can
collectively give direct support of— redesign, or reject ideas or actions
promulgated by elected officials or their agents, let us bring the following points
to bear on this presented commentary:

It has for too long been misconstrued that silence on the part of the public
is meant to define an agreement therewith (to proposed, practiced or legislated ideas).

It has for too long been the accepted standard to constructively minimize
the means by which the collective Will of the people can reject, modify, or initiate
their own measures of legislation through self-Representation. Such a form of self-
Representation is practically nullified and made severely dependent on the Authoritative
Will who direct our Will to be relegated and regulated along a process and procedure
of Referendum that amounts to a gauntlet administered by and for the discretions
of various Authoritative directives, which, analogously stated, places the public
into the position of harnessed draught animals attached with blinders and a carrot
held out in front of it via an extended pole and line which metaphorically define
an increasing disconnection of like-mindedness effected by a telescoping pole.

Arguments which present the in-place government as the best formula of social
governance, adopted by way of a Constitutional practice, attempts to mitigate the
objectives of those wanting to establish a government and Constitution created and
enforced by the Will of the People; and not the objectives of those who would prefer
a retention of the present governance formula because they have learned how to navigate
its pre-established artificialized waterways to their own advantage— that,
explained by way of analogy, is used by them as a stacked (marked) deck of cards.
It is a deck of cards which has been so traditionalized into a sacerdotal-like practice,
those who support their usage, are not only unable to recognize themselves as relying
on the marks; but are equally unable to observe that We The People clearly recognize
their dependence on such a deck that they want to force us into fully accepting
without question, or to question without expectation of receiving a coherent response!

Once we have made the foregoing request, with its constituent Declaration...
which must be in the form of a demand as a means of describing a committed
resoluteness to formally assert the affirmative of a deep seriousness; we will have
begun the trek towards the establishment of a New Government. These initial steps
will be accompanied by the first notes of the long awaited horn, and the first heart
beats of a drum that those whose souls share in the Revolutionary spirit... will
know it is their time, it is their moment in history to come forth and be recognized
as the generation whose courage trespassed into the many unknowns of foraging a New
Government, a Cenocracy! Our assertions will be like that of a flame which will begin
to make the desired ideals of Democracy more ductile to being recast into the sculpted
image which better exemplifies the Will of the People. It is a Will that is consistently
denied and even abrogated by the usage of an electoral college... as yet another
anti-public process and procedure.

Necessarily so, in order that those of us yet desirous of insisting for a better
formula of government above and beyond the present governing practice and not a
worse one... it behooves us to acknowledge and prepare for the eventuality; that
the state of Democracy may become so vulnerable that those with different ideologies,
particularly those wanting to advance some prejudicial concern, will attempt to
impress their Will as the dominant frame upon which the social structure should be
etched. Thus in our assertiveness to remold Democracy into that which will better
serve the collective Will of the Populace, we will likewise have to stand as vanguards
against those whose design is anything but honorable because it is motivated by
self-inclined ulterior motives. With Democracy thrust into a vulnerable state, ideas
of old may be tossed into the fore-front concealed by the garments of modern terms
and practiced persuasion. We must be wary not to fall victim to such con-artistry
that may be backed by enormous resources which may have no qualms about using any
method whatsoever to esteem their point of view in the eyes of the public to render
support... such as freeing the public from some social ill that they have perpetrated
on the people.

And as has already been mentioned, let it nonetheless be explicitly noted that
the primary role of this Cenocratic Revolution is neither to advocate the removal
or election of any person to public office. First, because we have not publicly
made any request for assistance, and secondly, because no one running for political
office has formerly announced their desire and intent to promote and pursue the
adoption of a Cenocracy with a Cenocratic Formula. In the first circumstance, to
effect our jurisdiction over the employment of any and all elected officials as well
as their own selective appointments, including those chosen for the Supreme Court, we
must publicly and formerly ask them to:

Lead us!
into a functional Cenocracy effecting a Cenocratic formula of governance,

Follow us!
into a functional Cenocracy effecting a Cenocratic formula of governance,

or...

Vacate The Premises!

If an elected public official, or those they have selected, refuses to abdicate
their position at our request... so that we can replace them or have them replaced
with someone whose interests are oriented towards the establishment of a Cenocracy
with a Cenocratic Formula; only then may we choose whether or not to direct our
assertions along a course of more aggressive efforts. These efforts must first
entail an attempt to isolate the official from being able to conduct any official
business. A denial to resign from their position at our request will be duly noted
as an obstinate arrogance. The very temperament recurringly acknowledged by so many
in the public as a pervasive ambiance which precipitates a disconnection of like-
mindedness between the governed and those who govern. In simpler terms, it is an
authoritative chip placed on their shoulder which permeates an atmosphere of conflict
requiring the usage of protest that is often provoked into escalated forms. It is
a circumstance which we must assert a formal directive against. The attempted
creation of an authoritative citadel behind a facade of legality is the very door
upon which we will knock. When we are presented with such a chip, we will, if need
be, in succession:

Knock It Off (Affirmably request that you knock off your activities and resign.)

Knock You Down (Affirmatively state the public has no confidence in you.)

Knock You Out (Reaffirm that we will use any manner of any method to remove you.)

At each knock of this three-noted Pied Piper's travail, we will ask, if the
circumstances presents itself as a necessity, that all law enforcement or alternative
forms of supportive interventionist actors, to please stand down. We will assert
our Right to alter or abolish the government as We The People see fit as was outlined
in the Nation's initial Declaration of Independence. To deny us this Right might
well be an accelerant to precipitate the occasions of a rational posture being forced
into the propagation of a needless inflammabilityY— whose flames, sparks and
embers may be long enduring. We ask that cool heads prevail, and that would-be
antagonists accede to the rationale of our Just Cause.

Those officials who obstinately refuse to abdicate their presumed throne of
power, that they have forgotten is a publicly provisioned position; must be fully
cognizant that we will go to any lengths that are necessary to effect their removal.
If current laws are not in accord with the public's desires, such laws will be
exchanged for those which better serve the Will of the people. The observing and
quite possibly, advisory public, must be fully aware that we do not wish to engage
in destruction or violence that might lead towards the physical, mental, or emotional
harm of anyone. We are not without the compassion nor magnanimity so many citizens
have been subjected to when attempting to get the redress of a grievance because
of some government-centered exploitation. Nonetheless, We The People expect the
compliance of any and all elected officials, and/or their chosen placements, to
acquiesce to our requests. We will not permit the laws of the land to be used against
the people, when it is Of, By and For, and not Against the people that laws are
supposed to be put into effect. Stubbornness on the part of an elected official or
those they have personally selected to fill a position, who then attempts to use
some policy and procedure to act as a legal justification for interfering with our
intentions, will not be tolerated.

In the event that any law, process, procedure or mere claim based on an assumed
right to effect the arrest of the public's intent and attempts to engage in a Cenocracy,
with a Cenocratic Formula; then it will be the avowed Right of the people to abnegate
any such advertisement, promotion or manufacture. Such a denial of the Right of the
people to engage in a reformulation of their government as they see fit to do so,
may be used as a declaration of war by the people against those seeking to vilify,
detour, or compartmentalize that right into negligibility.

We want to be civil, we want to be polite, we want to be nice. We want to be
law abiding, courteous and respectful. We want a direct means of collecting, discussing,
and legislating our collective grievances into resolutions that the People themselves
Represent and vote on without being subjected to denials based on the spurious claims
of those claiming a preeminence of right to do so in our stead, based on an antiquated
notion of vicarious Representation. We will not be subjected to the dictates of those
whose interest in their elected position is formulated on a predisposition to use
processes, procedures, time constraints and other legal machinations, to pervert the
definitions and measurements of equality, justice and liberty, to fulfill ulterior
motives at the expense of the public.

Let it be stated plainly, that if we are pushed, we will try to move out of
harms way. We do not want anyone to get hurt or to cause any destruction. But if
the intent is to back us into a corner, or to isolate us in any manner deemed anti-thetical
to the intent of the public to create the government that it wants, or to provoke
us into provenances of disreputable infamy to instigate reactionary impulsiveness,
we will push back.

Present Democracy is formulated on an obsession with time-delineated processes
and procedures that are used to determine right, wrong, good, bad, legal and illegal.
If a process and procedure are valid, as is so often asserted and used as a means
to disqualify a public claim or complaint, there would be no need to lie about the
validity of such a usage to keep it intact. This obsession, this desire to profit
the retention of a practice as being more important than the people themselves,
is a supreme failure of the Democratic principles being presently observed and
preserved. Such a failure is not deserving of public support by way of continuing
a practice of present governing standards, but of a concerted effort to force it
into obsolescence. We need to make the usage of lying on behalf of a process and
procedure, which has become an expectation developed in a work-place culture of an
operational standard; a point of evidence that the present formula of Democracy is
abhorrently malfeasant to the best interests of the public. It is an antagonism
which must be forcefully and directly addressed by demanding its disusage and
replacement with a better ideal.

Obliging ourselves to the formulas effected by contrived processes and procedures
monitored by self-established time constraints, is the adopted deferment to that
which best serves those effecting the usage of such rules and regulations, and
not those it is supposed to serve best... namely, the public. Permitting ourselves
to agree with such processes and procedures, rules and regulations, serves only to
establish the compliance to and functionality of such formulas as being more
important than those who are subjected to such. Put simply, the game rules being
practiced by those claiming to exercise the foremost Democratic ideals, are faulty
and need to be revised according to the collective Will of The People, who are the
majority of players in the present social game. While the present social structure
is a game, the usage of the word "game" is not a disparagement, but a means to
simplify the characterization of complex social processes into an easily understood
and identifiable model so that everybody has an opportunity to invest their personal
opinion in the overall protestations being voiced; and not let the characterization
become isolated into a specialty of concern through the usage of a vernacular meant
to further isolate and disenfranchise the public, by way of using intellectualisms
and verbiage which enables a select few to take charge of a situation that the
whole of the public has a right to be involved in... as a fully vested player and
not as a mere approval rating cue-card effected audience or by-stander.

Elected officials like to segregate the public into a spectrum of minimization
through the usage of various tools at their disposal such as rules, regulations,
processes, procedures, and self-defined entitlement. A Cenocratic formula of governance
will re-establish the right of the public to voice individual opinions and collectively
decide upon an action to address concerns which are defined, discussed, and voted
on by the public without any interference from any individual or group who have no
other interest but to try to disengage the group. The usage of position, or resources
will not be permitted to be used as tools of intimidation, though testimonies by
some may well be more persuasive argumentation than others. In effect, the whole
of the public will become re-enfranchised... though realistically, it has never
been fully enfranchised in the first place, in many governing systems throughout
history.

Those elected officials who claim to represent the Will of the People will be
obligated to make every effort to effect the establishment of a Cenocracy. We
can not continue playing the same social game of governance that we are. The
desired adoption of a Cenocratic Formula to be the preeminent process of the
Cenocracy, will have to be formally and firmly asserted by its advocates. Once we
have begun the trek towards the demand for a Cenocracy, there will be no turning
back. The landscape of our social consciousness will be forever changed. More and
more people will be awakened to the realization that they too are a Cenocratic
Revolutionist. Those advocating the adoption of some formerly recognized social
governance structure such as Communism or Socialism, or a retention of that presently
in-use Democratic-named "Representative" model, will be viewed as those harboring
an archaic mentality (the mentality of a past we have grown out of).

It is a mentality that may very well react with obstinate defiance that provokes
an escalation of protests from which might erupt the desire by some to use types
of armament that can produce both wide-spread destruction and violence against
individuals. If such a mentality persists, and will not accede to the demands of
the public advocating a Cenocracy, and a Cenocracy with a Cenocratic governing
formula, then a civil war may break out. With this said, it is necessary for those
in public militias who will come to side with those of us calling for a Cenocracy
with a Cenocratic formula, to be placed on alert. It is necessary that they take
an inventory of their arsenal and prepare for the possibility of a protracted confrontation.
However, this confrontation is not to be interpreted a break down in the civil
order. Those in militias, if called upon or take it upon themselves to use militant
force, must be directed towards a determination to avoid all forms of collateral
damage. Such damage, against non-combatants can be viewed as an act of criminality.
The rules of lawless carnage in wartime do not apply in a protest situation where
war has not been declared. You can not take it upon yourselves to declare war if
those you represent do not likewise make such a formal and public declaration,
backed by the rationale of effecting an established propriety on behalf of the
public. A Cenocratic Movement does not advocate Terrorism. Acts of militarism in
an event that has not been publicly defined and supported as a necessary and needed
means... for effecting a solution with those who are obstinate in their resolve not
to accede to the demands of the public, are neither condoned and rightly should be
condemned as criminal acts.

While some might say there is need for reconciliation to iron-out differences,
there should be no need for such. If elected officials truly represent the people,
there should be no need of protest. We should simply be able to make a written
request and they should oblige the people accordingly. But, there is no public
controlled means to have the collective opinion of the public be heard. If officials
say that they are Representing the Will of the People based solely on being elected,
and that we are little more than a whining, anti-civil rabble, then let there be a
public vote that does not have to cater to the time-constrained processes and
procedures dictated by them as a means of both manipulating public opinion and
declaring some assumed legality to deny the Will of the People to differ from their
own presumptions, accusations, and interpretations.

The rules of the game of the presently practiced Democracy are not predicated
on fairness. Participation in the social game by an established set of observances
which permits certain individuals in different instances to be most advantaged,
is of paramount importance. Who, how and why one is participating is of most value.
We are taught to embody the philosophy that it is not whether you win or lose that
counts, but how you play the game. It is an advertisement used by those who make
or control the rules, or the game, and want you to participate, so long as you
make it possible for them to take advantage of you. Likewise, politicians want
some people to engage themselves in the game of protest, but they don't want everyone
to play. They only want enough to be used as an advertisement that they are advocating
a game called Democracy, which involves the rule that protesting is permitted...
so long as it does not effect an actual alteration in a government formula for which
they have a controlling advantage of.

Some want to provoke controversy in order to influence an act of protest as a
means of acquiring public attention that may be used as a staged bull horn to make
an announcement for some activity that might otherwise have been ignored. And others
participate in a protest not because they are truly interested in helping to bring
about a change, but because it is a social event much like participating in some
activity as others do while at a public park on a Saturday or Sunday afternoon. While
we are permitted the right to protest, public officials take it upon themselves
to practice the right to ignore a protest. In other words, they no longer work for
us, but we for them. Instead of being able to ignore or reject a protest, there
should be a public means of having a protest publicly addressed, if the protest
is directed towards that involving the public and is not merely focused on whether
someone is liked or not. Whereas a person should have the right to reject a protest
directed against a dislike for a given personal attribute, such is not the case
when the protest involves an issue involving the public. Disregarding a protest
using a formula of a public and formal request for redress, must be respected, but
not those protests utilizing a lynch mob mentality.

If We The People are sincere and serious about wanting to bring about changes
to the present form of governance, our request for a redress of grievance(s) must
involve a list thereof. You would not want to be confronted by those who are protesting
you with claims of participation in a corruption, and yet don't explicitly state what
they perceive to be corruption. However, people do become so over-whelmingly frustrated
from hearing about one or another multiple instances of some government mal-practice,
that they are at a loss for words. Each instance of some government-involved wrong-doing
becomes catalogued in some internalized file system which bulges one's emotions and
thoughts into a magnified sphere of unverbalized and largely unvented distrust. The
colloquial reference denoted as "Everyone knows" or "What else is new?" or "That's
a no brainer", along with a variety of other expressions, are used as acceptable
substitutes to itemize and justify the existence of a collectively public recognition
that the "government" is in need of change, and yet is unable to create the necessary
improvements because it entails the requirement for an architectural restructuring
involving the basic foundation.

A foundational restructuring on the level to which we speak, will dramatically
alter the political landscape of power. The wealthy will no longer have the means
to influence political decisions which exclude the citizenry. If companies want to
effect the usage of lobbyists, they will have to direct the bulk of their persuasive
talents to the Peoples Legislative Branch who will have no direct means of altering
the Will of the People; whose collective opinion will be by way of a National discussion
followed by a National Referendum. An elected Official will be confronted with a
significantly decreased ability to individuate their opinions and influences along
a tit -for- tat exchange in terms of received campaign contributions. Since the
Peoples Legislative Branch will be generated from self-appointed lists of randomly
chosen selections who do not need to use any manipulative resource, the ability to
sway the perspective of a PLB member by way of a bribe in the form of a campaign
contribution, will be of negligible, if any possibility. No doubt, those who like
their ability to bribe politicians, judges, and other public officials, will attempt
to exert their influence to keep a Cenocratic formula from ever taken effect. Such
an exercise on their part will help us to identify and selectively target for
expulsion from their respective office.

No doubt fantastic claims resembling some doomsday scenario may well be put into
effect to persuade the public, through bought and paid for media sources, that it
should reject the proposal for adopting a Cenocratic governance model. No doubt
some may try to exert their preference for retaining the present form of governance
by way of perpetrating some undesirable social privation. And no doubt, We The
People will prevail. We will also make note of and prepare for the possibility of
having to instill an interim government if those who can not influence a retention
of the present one which best suits their personal interests and objectives; decide
to act as a peevish and petulant child throwing a temper tantrum and wants to create
as much destruction, disharmony and disorder as they can, to retaliate against all
those who decide that a Cenocratic formula is the better governing ideal. As such,
it will be of need for those having an interest in playing a role in the reformulation
of the governing structure to step forward and make such an interest known.

And yet, in an attempt to make an inventory of how the previously noted "need
for change" in the government should come about, one might comes across few realistic
alternatives when various members of the public are asked. Without a visible alternative
in mind to suggest, they might well react by resigning themselves to some internalized
grumbling... and yet the desire for a better form of government is not diminished.
In fact, in many instances, such a desire is enhanced because people hate to think
that the present design of social governance is the best that human imagination,
ingenuity, compassion, sensitivity, intelligence and wisdom has to offer. They are
literally disgusted by such a consideration. To think that there is nothing but a
choice between two evils, and yet still having to live amongst both in a less-than
desirable social-governing environment... makes some consider they are either in
purgatory or hell.

A Cenocracy with a Cenocratic formula is a viable way out. But like all uncharted
trails into an unknown territory, we will have to contend, from time to time, with
those who come upon a personalized cross-road to give up, return from whence they
came, or desire to settle down at a given comfortable spot along the way, despite
the discussions of those wanting yet to go further into the unexplored horizon upon
which the dawn is yawning into wakefulness. It is time for get our affairs in order
and move on. I hope to meet with you along the road of the Peoples' Cenocracy, and
I hope we shall find that which generations throughout the centuries have sought
for, in a proposed and practice Cenocratic Governance Formula.