It was well said by the editor of a Collection of Treaties published in 17/2 that to a statesman a Collection of Treaties is a code or body of Law, and to him is of the same use as is a Collection of the Statutes to the lawyer. 2 But their historical place and value must never be lost to sight. They are to be viewed as marking points in the movement of thought. 8

The relation of a Treaty to ' the Law ' may well give rise to doubt. On this thorny subject the conclusions of Madison, 4 the American statesman and one of the three contributors to The Federalist, had the approval of Sir Travers Twiss. 5 Treaties, said Madison, may be considered in several relations

2 A Collection of all the Treaties of Peace, Alliance, and Commerce, between Great Britain and other Powers, from the Revolution in 1688, to the Present Time. 2 vols. (1772).

W. E. Hall, cited above, p. 113.

4 Examination of the British Doctrine, 1806, p. 39.

The Law of Nations ... I'M Time of Peace, 2nd ed. (1884), pp. 164-5.

Treaties 143

to the Law of Nations according to the several questions that are to be decided.

' They may be considered as simply repeating or affirming the General Law : they may be considered as making exceptions to the General Law, which are to be a particular Law to the parties themselves : they may be considered as explanatory of the Law of Nations on points where its meaning is other- wise obscure or unsettled, in which case they are first a Law between the parties themselves, and next a sanction to the General Law, according to the reasonableness of the explana- tion, and the number and character of the parties to it : lastly, treaties may be regarded as forming a voluntary or positive Law of Nations. Whether the stipulations of a treaty are to be considered as an affirmance, or an exception or an explanation, may sometimes appear upon the face of the treaty ; sometimes, being naked stipulations, their character must be determined by resorting to other evidences of the Law of Nations. In other words, the question concerning the Treaty must be decided by the Law, not the question concerning the Law by the Treaty.'

Collection of Treaties

There are many collections 1 of treaties, and of treaty- documents, both general and national. Only a few need be mentioned here.

(a) General :

Dumont, Corps Universel Diplomatique ; 2

Koch et Scholl, Histoire abregee des Traites from 1648 to i8i5, 3 with full text of some and a connecting narrative, and the revival and continuation of the workbyleComte de Garden;

1 A considerable impetus to the study of treaties was given by Leibnitz towards the beginning of the eighteenth century. On the unfavouring eyes with which the Cabinets of Europe viewed the publication of their treaties in a collection, see Travers Twiss, op. cit., pp. xxix-xxx.

Rymer, Foedera* and Syllabus to the work by Sir T. D. Hardy, issued for the Record Commission ; 7

C. Jenkinson (later, Earl of Liverpool), A Collection of all the Treaties of Peace . . . between Great Britain and other Powers from 1648 to I783; 8

1 8 vols., 1791-1808.

2 Nouveau Recueil, 16 vols., Nouveau Recueil General, &c.

8 A periodical publication since 1861. It is the chief collection for European States as a whole, and is especially designed as a collection of diplomatic documents.

4 First and second series, 1861-1900 ; continued thereafter, four volumes being published yearly.

1910. See also The Great European Treaties oj the Ninetetntb Century,

1 91 8 (Clarendon Press).

6 Arcbiva regia reserata, sive foedera . . . inter reges Angliae et alias quosvis ab ineunte saeculo Xll mo . The work began with the reign of Henry I and came down to 1654. There were subsequent editions which need to be distinguished. Rymcr's work was a Government publication, suggested by that of Leibnitz. He was Historiographer Royal from 1692 to 1714.

7 2 vols., 1869-72 (vol. i, to 1377; vol. ii, 1377-1654).

3 vols., 1785. This is the second edition of the work published in 2 vols.

in 1772. In the Advertisement (pp. v-vi) to this earlier work it was said : ' A Collection of Treaties was published in the Year 1732 ; and is now very scarce. The Treaties contained in that Work are not only very irregularly arranged, but upon comparing them with the detached copies published by Authority, were found to be very inaccurately printed ; and some Treaties were wholly omitted.' The work'of 1732 was in 4 vols.

Treaties 145

Chalmers, A Collection of Maritime Treaties of Great Britain and other Powers ; *

Hertslet, A Complete Collection of the Treaties and Conventions at present subsisting between Great Britain & Foreign Powers ; so far as they relate to Commerce ff Navigation ; to the Repression and Abolition of the Slave Trade ; and to the Privileges C5? Interests of the Subjects of the High Contracting Parties. The Whole in English, W the Modern Treaties y most important Documents, also in the Foreign Languages in which they were signed?

Treaty Series?

Originals of British Treaties are in the Public Record Office ; also Treaty Papers and State Papers, Foreign. The British Museum Catalogues (MSS.) should also be consulted.

1 2 Vols., 1/90.

2 By Lewis Hertslet, Esq., Librarian and Keeper of the Papers, Foreign Office. The work was published in 2 vols., 1820. It has been continued to date. The Treaties with Austria go back to the Treaty of Alliance signed at Toplitz, October 3, 1813 ; with Denmark, to the Treaty signed at White- hall, February 13, 1660-1661 ; with France, to the Treaty of Utrecht, March 31 -April 11, 1713 ; with Portugal, to the Treaty signed at London, January 29, 1642 ; with Spain, to the Treaty signed at Madrid, May 13-23, 1667; with Sweden, to the Treaty signed at Upsal, April u, 1654 ; with Turkey, to the Capitulation and Articles of Peace of 1675; with the United States of America, to the Treaty of Peace signed at Ghent, Decem- ber 24, 1814. For Treaties, Acts, and Declarations on the Slave Trade, and on trade with the Colonies, see especially vol. iii (1827).