Not that this comes as a shock, but recently Emperor, or excuse me
President Obama has decided to ignore the Constitution once more by
passing a series of gun laws through Executive Orders. These laws
include extending background checks and requiring any private gun
seller to obtain a Federal Firearms License, even if he is just a
onetime seller. Then of course he made sure that the orders included
an expansion of BATFE agents so that these laws will be enforced.

Apparently Mr. Constitutional Scholar didn't read the part of the
Constitution that said that Congress is the only branch who is allowed
to make law. He also missed the part about how Executive Orders only
apply to those employed by the Federal Government. Of course Barry has
never let that pesky document get in the way in the past, so why start
now?

As usual we have our share of celebrities who support Obama's illegal
orders. Some have even thanked Obama and have encouraged him to go
further. I am not going to mention the names of these celebrities,
since they have way too much exposure as it is, but they constantly
mistake the size of their incomes with the size of their intellects.
They are certainly entitled to their misinformed opinions, just as
long as they know that they are speaking for themselves and not "The
Little Guy."

The picture wouldn't be complete without the left-wing sock puppets,
oh excuse me commentators who pretty much repeat Obama's nonsense
verbatim. Usually they say, "Obama had to pass the order, since
Congress wouldn't." Apparently they took the same Constitutional Law
class that Barry took, which failed to explain the concept of the
separation of powers. "Well he was doing it for the will of the
people." Says who? "The polls say that Americans support extended
back ground checks."

First of all, I have never been impressed with polls in the first
place. I managed to become even less impressed when I had to conduct
them for a research company during the 2012 elections. Many of the
questions that I had to ask were twisted in such a way that it would
be almost impossible for the results not to be skewed. The polls on
the extended background checks are no exception. The problem is that
many of these polls don't differentiate between the background checks
that we have now or the so-called extended checks.

Here is something else to ponder. If anti-gun legislation is so well
supported by the people, then why is it such a political loser? Hell,
even when the Democrats had both houses of Congress they were still
afraid to touch this issue. Let my guess, it is the evil NRA and the
satanic powers that they have over congress. Seriously, do these
idiots believe that the NRA has pictures of every member of congress
having an orgy in hell? I also find it somewhat telling that whenever
an anti-gun article appears on the net, the overwhelming majority of
those who post in the comment section are Pro-Second Amendment
supporters who refute the junk that masquerades as real journalism. I
remember this one Rolling Stone article about the most dangerous guns
of America that had nothing but pages and pages of comments slamming
its bias and downright ignorance of firearms. Despite all this, the
anti-gun side still claims that they represent the will of the people.

I also love the Townhall questions, where Obama was asked by a rape
victim why he was trying to make it harder for people to obtain
firearms to protect themselves from sexual predators. He responded by
denying that his new regulations would make it harder for anybody to
obtain a firearm and that it was actually better for a rape victim not
to have a gun, since it could be taken away and used against her. I
will say that Obama's response was slightly better than the one given
by a democratic legislator in Colorado, when a co-ed advocating
concealed carry on college campuses asked what she was supposed to do
against a rapist. The co-ed was told to just vomit and defecate on
herself as a form of rape prevention. Obama's response was still
insulting, since it seems as if he was implying that women aren't
competent enough to defend themselves. Sounds a little sexist if you
ask me. Yet not a single feminist is around to give him the verbal
smack down that he deserves. I guess they are just too busy
complaining about the non-existent pay gap.

The few upsides to Obama's Executive Orders is that they expire once
he leaves office for good. That is assuming that the order doesn't
get struck down in the courts, which as Judge Andrew Napolitano has
pointed out, is a strong possibility. Another upside to all this, is
that it shows how desperate the anti-gun side is becoming every day.
They can't just ram legislation through Congress like they used to and
contrary to their state of denial, public sentiment isn't on their
side like it used to be. The only play they have left is to have the
president issue a temporary order. Pretty soon they will be out of
cards to play.

Was that worth reading?Then why not:

Just click the red box (it's a button!) to pay the author

This site may receive compensation if a product is purchasedthrough one of our partner or affiliate referral links. Youalready know that, of course, but this is part of the FTC DisclosurePolicy found here. (Warning: this is a 2,359,896-byte 53-page PDF file!)TLE AFFILIATE