CIA leak suspicion centers on Lewis Libby, Cheney's chief of staff

By Eric Boehlert

Criminal leak investigations are notoriously futile, and the identity of the administration
officials who illegally blew the cover of CIA operative Valerie Plame may never be known. But one name keeps coming up, and
so far it hasn't provoked a specific, emphatic White House denial: Lewis "Scooter" Libby, assistant to the president and Vice
President Dick Cheney's powerful chief of staff.

On Wednesday the New York Daily News reported that "Democratic congressional sources said they
would like to hear from Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis Libby." On MSNBC's "Buchanan and Press" on Wednesday,
Pat Buchanan asked an administration critic who claims to know the leaker's name point blank if "Scooter Libby" was the culprit
(the critic wouldn't answer). And Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska made a veiled reference on CNBC this week, suggesting
that President Bush could better manage the current crisis by "sitting down with [his] vice president and asking what he knows
about it."

But below the surface there's even more chatter. Says one former senior CIA officer who served
under President Bush's father, "Libby is certainly suspect No. 1."

Libby might feel more secure if the White House would issue a blanket denial about his involvement,
the way it did for Bush's top political aide, Karl Rove, who was the focus of attention early in the week as the possible
source. At a press briefing this week, White House spokesman Scott McClellan was adamant: "The president knows [Rove] wasn't
involved ... It's simply not true."

And later, McClellan dismissed as "ridiculous" any suggestions that Rove may have played a
role, adding, "There is simply no truth to that suggestion. And I have spoken with Karl about it."

But when a reporter asked about Libby, McClellan cut him off with a non-response.

"Does [Bush] know whether or not the vice president's chief of staff, Lewis Libby ..." the
reporter began. McClellan interrupted: "Do you have any specific information to bring to my attention? Like I said, there
has been nothing that's been brought to our attention."

Asked for a comment about speculation surrounding Libby, Cheney's spokeswoman Cathie Martin
tells Salon, "This is a serious matter and we shouldn't be speculating in light of an ongoing investigation."

By all accounts, Libby was certainly at the heart of the administration's high-level arm-twisting
in the intelligence community, trying to massage evidence to make the case that Iraq was an imminent danger to the world.
He and his boss Cheney, along with a cadre of administration hawks, took the lead in trying to sell a number of bogus claims,
from the notion that Saddam Hussein tried to buy uranium from Niger to the false assertion that hijacker Mohammed Atta met
with an Iraqi spy before 9/11.

The Plame controversy, of course, stems from a New York Times opinion piece written by former
U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, Plame's husband, in July. In it, he revealed that in 2002 he traveled to Niger on an assignment
for the CIA to investigate allegations that Saddam Hussein was trying to buy uranium from the African nation. Wilson wrote
that he reported back that the claims were likely bogus, yet President Bush still included mention of the uranium plot in
this year's State of the Union address.

One week after Wilson's Op-Ed, conservative columnist Robert Novak wrote a piece defending the White House, arguing that Wilson's trip to Niger was arranged by
his wife, Valerie Plame, "an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction."

Novak wasn't the only journalist who received such a briefing back in July (five others reportedly
got the same tip), but he was the only one who went public with the information. The leak was in violation of a 1982 federal
law that prohibits the unauthorized disclosure of the identity of a clandestine intelligence officer. And the guessing game
has become heated.

Many of the clues pointing toward Libby come from Novak himself, who's provided a number of
details about his source. (Yes, there were two Novak sources, but according to the columnist, after a senior administration
source gave him Plame's identity, the second source merely confirmed that when Novak told him he knew.)

For instance, the source "is no partisan gunslinger," according to Novak's Wednesday column.
That description would certainly rule out the hyper-political Rove. The "no partisan gunslinger" tag fits Libby better. A
consummate Washington Republican insider, Libby rarely throws bombs in the press, or parades in front of the talking-head
cameras. Instead, he's considered a behind-the-scenes power broker who bounces back and forth between senior government jobs
and his lucrative Beltway law practice. Between 1995 and 2000 Libby served as fugitive billionaire Marc Rich's attorney.

And yes, Condi Rice seems to be off the hook; on TV Novak has referred to his source as "he."

But more significantly, it's important to remember what Novak was looking for when he dialed
up his "senior administration source" last July. According to his accounts, Novak wasn't fishing for Plame's identity. Instead
he was looking for an answer to the question: Why was Wilson chosen to go to Africa?

Novak told CNN he thought Wilson was a strange choice, since he'd donated to Democratic campaigns
and had no experience with weapons of mass destruction.

Wilson's July Op-Ed appeared on a Sunday. "On Monday, I began to report on something that I
thought was very curious," Novak told CNN. As he explained in his Wednesday column, "During a long conversation with a senior
administration official, I asked why Wilson was assigned the mission to Niger."

The question is, where would have been the logical place for Novak to start his inquiry about
Wilson's trip? One obvious answer is in Cheney's office. As Wilson had explained in his column, it was because of Cheney that
he was sent to Niger: "In February 2002, I was informed by officials at the Central Intelligence Agency that Vice President
Dick Cheney's office had questions about a particular intelligence report. The agency officials asked if I would travel to
Niger to check out the story so they could provide a response to the vice president's office."

We don't know whether Libby served as an anonymous contact for Novak inside the VP's office.
But courtesy of Time.com, we do know Libby was talking to reporters about Wilson at around the time Novak's column ran.

Headlined "At War on Wilson?" and posted online in July, the Time.com article detailed how
since the publication of the New York Times Op-ed, "Administration officials have taken public and private whacks at Wilson."
It also noted, "Some government officials have noted [in private] to TIME in interviews, (as well as to syndicated columnist
Robert Novak) that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, is a CIA official."

In other words, Time.com was getting anonymous administration tips about the same information
Novak received. But from whom?

Dissecting the piece, it's interesting to note the three administration officials who were
quoted. The first two were then-spokesman Ari Fleischer and CIA director George Tenet. But their quotes about Wilson and his
trip were made in front of a group of reporters. The third administration source, whose quote came during "an exclusive interview"
with Time, was Libby. He denied Cheney had anything to do with requesting Wilson's trip or that he knew about the former ambassador's
subsequent report.

One of the simplest shortcuts in journalism when trying to identify an anonymous quote or source
of information is to see who is quoted on the record within in the same story, since often during an interview with reporters,
sources will interrupt and suggest a specific fact or quote be on background or off the record. So it's hard not to wonder:
During his "exclusive interview" with Time, did Libby, as an aside, pass along the information about Plame, and ask that it
not be attributed to him? Or did Time independently confirm the CIA operative's identity from other administration sources,
and then talk to Libby? We aren't likely to ever get an answer, but the questions are intriguing.

And there are other small clues. According to a Wednesday USA Today article, "Vice President
Cheney and his chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, met with officials at the [CIA's] Non-Proliferation Center before the
invasion of Iraq to discuss reports that Iraq was seeking to buy uranium in Africa."

Plame works at the Non-Proliferation Center. The paper noted that she did not attend the meetings
with Libby, but it's plausible that he found out about her employment while he was there.

Libby and Cheney, in highly unusual moves, visited the CIA several times before the war, in
what many observers saw as an attempt to pressure analysts to produce more damaging assessments about Saddam Hussein's arsenal
or any connection with al-Qaida.

According to a Washington Post report on Monday, Cheney and Libby continued to press the story
about 9/11 hijacker Mohammad Atta's meeting with an Iraqi spy in Prague long after the intelligence community had dismissed
it. The two even insisted, on the eve of Secretary of State Colin Powell's presentation to the United Nations Security Council
last February, that the charge be included in Powell's indictment of Iraq defying the council's resolutions.

Someone so steeped in CIA intelligence could have been a helpful source on the Plame story.

Several more telling clues about Libby came Wednesday during an MSNBC appearance by Larry Johnson,
a former counterterrorism official at the CIA and the State Department.

Earlier in the week Johnson, who calls himself a registered Republican who donated to the Bush
campaign, made a media splash with his appearance on PBS's "Newshour" by confirming that Plame did indeed work undercover
for the CIA. It was a key assertion because since Novak's column first ran, the columnist had tried to back off the claim
he made in July that she was an operative. Instead, claimed Novak, she was simply an analyst -- the implication being, making
her identity known was not that big a deal. Johnson shot that theory down, and to date nobody from the CIA, or any other reporter,
has come forward to question his veracity (though several critics have noted that his claim that Plame was an operative "for
three decades" was implausible since Plame is only 40.)

Appearing on Wednesday's "Buchanan & Press," Johnson told the hosts, "I know the name of
the person that spoke with Bob Novak," and that the person worked "at the White House," and more specifically, "in the Old
Executive Office Buildings." The vice president's office is located inside the Old Executive Office Building.

And when Buchanan asked Johnson point-blank, "Scooter Libby. Now, is Scooter Libby the name
you heard?" Johnson said simply, "I'm not going to comment on that."

This site contains copyrighted
material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

YodasWorld.org is updated each Monday. Some of
the items from the previous week are added to the various topic links on the left side of the main page. Links embedded
should be good for at least the date posted. After the posting date, link reliability depends on the policy of the linked
sites. Some sites require visitors to register before allowing access to articles. Material presented on this page represent
the opinion's of YodasWorld.org.

Copyright 2000-2011 YodasWorld.org. All rights
reserved on original works. Material copyrighted by others is used either with permission or under a claim of "fair use."