You can reset your password by going here. Be sure to try your current email and any email addresses you may have had in the past.
Otherwise please use the Contact Us link at the bottom of the forums. In order to help you, please provide the following info:
Your Display Name from the old forum and any possible email addresses you would have used before. Without that info we cannot locate your account.

“In any grade where a March contest is run as a separate event from a Strathspey and Reel contest, the two separate events may not be run simultaneously. "Simultaneously" is defined as requiring a competitor to play the march and then requiring the strathspey & reel event to be played immediately thereafter before the same judge.”

“In any grade where a March contest is run as a separate event from a Strathspey and Reel contest, the two separate events may not be run simultaneously. "Simultaneously" is defined as requiring a competitor to play the march and then requiring the strathspey & reel event to be played immediately thereafter before the same judge.”

I don't know, the text seems to clearly state it can't be the same judge. So you would stop after the march, go to another tent and play the S&R for another judge.

I've even seen cases in which a competitor will break down in the March portion, touch up the drones, recompose himself, and then play the strathspey and reel. Just a different way of staging the contest than what's commonly done in North America.

Interesting thread,
When I competed at the Perth games a few years ago, there were I believe 48 in the light music events. It was a March, Strathspey & Reel, and Jig contest. The March was played, re-tuning allowed and then the S&R, more re-tuning if required, then the jig was played. An efficient way to conduct the contest, especially with 48 competitors too