The peers are presumably the "different co-bodies" in section 2. However, I think a further credit/acknowledgment of these co-bodies in the Acknowledgment section would be appropriate. Section 3 clearly indicates that the study was successful and the hypothesis correct. I qualify as a neutral peer and I believe this document is worthy of publication -- so take an upvote from me. I invite OP to provide an additional paper for consideration after the permanent full joining of the two initial bodies. It should include the details of the joining ceremony and the reactions of familiar co-bodies. Further, this reviewer would like a brief summary of the location and increase in happiness provided by the post-joining vacation.

This redditor wishes both 'bodies' many decades of continued attraction and increasing happiness in your study. Study well and often.

If I understand the process correctly, the results will be formally vetted in a ceremony where a group of interested parties will be invited to expound on whether there is any reason why these two should not be "wed", or else forfeit any future right to lodge complaints regarding same.

Yah. Bonus points, my spine was circumcised. I suffered from tethered cord syndrome which is when a piece of connective tissue (the filum terminale, which connects the bottom of the spinal cord to the base of the spine) is too tight and puts tension on the spinal cord. This caused a barrel of problems rather from weakness and pain in the legs to urinary dysfunction (I had to catheterize every time I wazzed). So a neurosurgery team removed part of my vertebrae to expose the inside and then identified the filum terminale amidst the fan of nerves and sliced it. It was under so much tension in my case that it snapped apart like a rubber band (that's a Bad ThingTM).

My brain is also excessively well hung.... which is how I jokingly refer to having Chiari Malformation. Basically, the bottom of the cerebellum (the lower rear lobes of the brain), called the cerebellar tonsils, were being pressed through the opening at the bottom of the skull. This screws a fuckton of things up. So I had part of my skull and first vertebrae removed to create an opening to the cerebellar tonsils and then the neurosurgeons removed a portion of the cerebellar tonsils. Fun surgery. Here's a picture of my neck vagina (the wound after the surgery).

Agreed and as I am reading this from the medical field the lack of statistics on any real measurable data apart from observation leads me to be very skeptical of the conclusions. Plus the data sample was too small.

So you're saying she dies for rejecting me and I should feel bad? That doesn't make any sense. It'd be taking a huge load off my shoulders not to have to go through the whole axemurder/feeding her to my dogs shebang again.

Think carefully before upgrading to OFP. It's reported by some to buggy, expensive and prone to frying the motherboard. And the fatherboard. Manufacturer recommends you occasionally offload those files to external drives or a partitioned virtual disk found at root/grandparents so you and your p2p network assets can defrag and confirm hardware compatibility.

Since you're new to LaTeX you might want to have a look at XeTeX. It offers (among some other things) Unicode support and support for newer font technologies. Plus with fontspec you can use your system fonts in XeLaTeX!

Note that the microtype package is barely supported by XeTeX, only protrusion is working at the moment, unfortunately :(

Reminds me of lower school years when we saw differentiation/integration symbols on the whiteboard leftover from higher classes, and were amazed at how advanced and difficult it looked. Everything is learnable.

Although for me personally there is one exception to this. Permutations and combinations. Fuck them, I just cannot do them, no matter how much I try to learn.

Exactly. I spent a lot of my years as a physics undergrad feeling stupid.

For perms and combs, try a different textbook or try Khan academy. Again, from my undergrad years, I learned that sometimes the problem isn't the source material but rather the way I was trying to learn.

I find this reply to be contaminated by condescension, as the stated "analytical methods" employed in said paper are rudimentary, intuitive concepts fluffed up with lexicon that alternates from that of the contemporary societal standard.

I disagree. If you are starting out, don't get distracted by holding Lyx's hand. You should jump right into LaTeX to familiarize yourself with its nuances. I find forcing myself to do homework assignments works really well.

I remain concerned about the lack of elucidation on the nature of the multi-body interactions occurring on an apparently frequent basis. While it does not appear to have perturbed the main studied system, the likely frequency of these interactions does not appear to be represented in the results other than the substantial presence of error bars. Could the author please elaborate on the effect of these perturbations.

The use of the non-standard unit "year" is frowned upon. Please change to SI units (for reference: given the long time span of this potential study, sidereal days would be acceptable). Happiness is of course measured in kilopuppies.

The suggestion is that the fitted data will continue on an exponential fit. Would the author care to elucidate on whether he expects this relationship to continue despite the more closely bound state and what evidence he has to suggest this. What method has he used to produce projected data. Are his projections representative of similar studies of similar multi body couplings and do they account for the possibility of external interactions causing potential perturbations.

The use of a check box for soliciting feed back is most unconventional. Please refrain from using such in the future.

Journal entry 9.1.063: Yet another failure last night trying to achieve the elusive 3-body MFF excitement state. It appears frequently in the literature but so far actual lab results have not been successful. I am starting to suspect that fellow researchers reporting successful actuation have intentionally misreported their results. Alcohol does seem to be a common catalyst, but even after years of tests I still cannot predict the reaction chain that leads to a stable end state.

I vow to continue my research as long as funding holds out and lab time is available on Saturday nights. For now I will reexamine the online video research archives for any hints toward replicating results. I do find this line of inquiry most enjoyable. I will be successful. I must...For science!

(Edit: Reddit pervs, stop messaging me. I'm a guy, not a girl. Unless you are a girl and want to play in the lab).