Post navigation

Statistics show bank robberies on the decline

LOS ANGELES COUNTY — Bank robberies in Los Angeles County and across the state have hit a 10-year low, according to the FBI.

Annual bank robbery statistics released by the FBI Wednesday indicate that officials investigated 122 bank robberies in the county in 2011, compared with 168 in 2010.

With the exception of a moderate uptick in bank heists in 2008 and 2009, bank robberies in Los Angeles county have been steadily waning since 2002, when 401 such crimes were reported.

A similar trend was seen statewide, where 677 bank robberies took place in 2011, down from 779 in 2010 and 1,405 in 2002, according to the FBI report.

“The decrease in overall robberies is attributable in part to closer cooperation among law enforcement agencies, successful prosecution by the United States Attorney’s Office and its counterparts at the district attorney’s offices, as well as a more proactive approach by the banking community in the implementation of additional security measures,” FBI officials said in a written statement.

“In addition, media coverage of increasingly clear bank surveillance photographs, and rewards offered by banks and law enforcement (have) contributed to the community’s awareness and has generated valuable assistance from the public in the identification of unknown subjects,” the statement said.

According to the data, California saw about twice the number of bank robberies as any other state. New York comes in second with 339 bank robberies reported in 2011.

Bank heists have been on a steady decline since the early 1990s, officials added.

Though yearly numbers show bank robberies declining, “In January 2012, the pace of bank robberies has increased and so far this year, 40 bank robberies have been reported in the seven-county area, primarily in Los Angeles and Orange counties, followed by Riverside County.

About 12 percent of the heists reported to the Los Angeles Field Office of the FBI were “takeovers” — in which employees or customers are held hostage during the crime.

Along with the updated statistics, the FBI Wednesday issued a list of the region’s top ten wanted serial bank robbers.

They include the “Explosive Threat Bandit,” tied to six L.A. County bank robberies since November — the first of which took place at a West Covina Bank of America Branch; as well as the “Lift and Show Bandit,” linked to three bank robberies in La Puente, West Covina and Pico Rivera since December.

Seven suspected serial bank robbers who have been operating in the Los Angeles area have been arrested this month, including the prolific “Market Duo,” “Bubble Wrap” and “Puffy Coat” bandits.

Anyone with information about a bank robber at-large is asked to call the FBI’s 24-hour tip line in Los Angeles at 310-477-6565.

PHOTOS of the “Explosive Threat Bandit” (top) and the “Lift and Show Bandit,” (below) courtesy of the FBI.

Would you get your
money back if every body decided to withdraw all their accounts –
NO WAY.

Economic Experts
say that there would only enough money to repay 50% of their clients.

Are you going to be
in the 50% — that loose your money.– Get it out NOW.

2012 — – June.
– Published in Anglo INFO .Geneva.— USA Trust Fund Investors were
sent false and fraudulent documents by Pictet Bank.Switzerland. in
order to collect large fees. ( Like MADOFF) —Even after the SEC in
the USA uncovered the fraud Pictet continued to charge fees and drain
whatever was left in these accounts. Estimated that $90,000,000
million lost in this Pictet Ponzi scheme.

All
the fines that crooked Swiss banks have incurred in the last few
years exceeds £75.Billion.

It
is also calculated that the secrecy ” agreements” with
regards to tax evation by their clients will cost the banks another
£450 Billion.( paid out of your monies.).

The
banks are panicking — the are quickly restructuring their banks
—- from partnerships –

to
” LIMITED COMPANIES.” —– this will probably mean that
in the future — they could

pay
you only 10% of your monies ” if you are one of the lucky ones”
—- and it be legal.

Google
—- The Crimes of —- Pictet & Cie Bank.

jack loach

Sods —–
Law.

March.—-
2015.

For almost two
decades we have strived to get justice for the injustice we have
suffered at the hands of a world renowned bank— PICTET & CIE.
BANK.

Two yorkshiremen
both running their own small family businesses trying to resolve the
problem by taking all the correct legal procedures to recover their
monies.

The matter was
raised in Parliament – twice– the FSA investigated the matter
concluding that PICTET had rogues operating in their London Bank —
but the rogues had left —saying no one left to prosecute.??? —–
so there.

We then
approached the Financial Ombudsman Service. (FOS) — our case was
dealt with by seven different people —- then our numerous E-Mails
were ignored — nobody would speak to us ——-so there.

We then asked the
SFO ( Serious Fraud Office.) to investigate our case —- the
criteria of our case ticked all their boxes. — we were instructed
not to send them

any
documents/evidence.—— in fact they wrote to us advising us to go
to the Citizen’s Advice Bureau.(CAB.)

Richard Alderman
the SFO boss —- who responded to our letter was the same man who
would not investigate the “ Madoff” scandal or the “Libor”
fiasco.

The MP’s
committee —- said he was sloppy— and the SFO was run like “
Fred Karno’s Circus” —– it was an office of fraud.—– so
there.

Our M.P.
approached our local Chief Constable to investigate—– he was
called—- Sir Norman Bettison— Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
Police —- a force that made “ Dad’s Army” look like the S.A.S.
They were inept – corrupt —malicious — from top to bottom. We
were criminally dealt with by the Forces Solicitor—- the Head of
the Economic Crime Unit —-and the Chief Constable —– so there.

We were then
advised to pass our complaint against West Yorkshire Police to the
I.P.C.C. – which we did — they advised us to make our complaint
to —- the West Yorkshire Police — we did with reluctance — all
we got was abuse and obfuscation. —– so there.

Sir Norman
Bettison —- The Forces solicitor— and the Head of the Economic
Crime —- have all been removed from their posts and facing criminal
allegations.

—— so there.

We even sought
justice through the Courts — culminating in a visit to the Court of
Appeal-London.— On leaving the Courts of Appeal that day our
barrister a “rising star” informed us — that if that was
British Justice then you can keep it. He quit the law and moved to
Canada —– so there.

A few years later
we learned that one of the judges ( Lord Justice.) in our case at the
Court of Appeal was related to a senior executive of the Pictet Bank
—–so there.

The Ministry of
Justice passed our case to Lord Myners to investigate — we would
rather have had Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck do it. — to this day we
don’t know

—whether he did
anything or not —- probably not — seeing that his wife was on the
Pictet Prix Board.

Pictet & Cie
.Bank — voted private bank of the year 2013.

Ivan Pictet —-
Voted banker of the year 2012. —- the senior partner — lied on
numerous occasions and had documents destroyed — also said genuine
documents were forgeries. —– so there.

Ivan Pictet in
Oct. 2013 —- Given the Legion of Honour — but saying that —-
honours were given to Hitler — Eichmann — Mussolini —Franco
— he’s in fitting company. —-so there.

Monty
Raphael.Q.C. along with Ivan Pictet withheld crucial documents
requested by the High Court —- the FSA —- and the police Fraud
Squad. —-so there.

Monty
Raphael.Q.C. became an Honorary Queens Counsellor in March. 2012.

Monty
Raphael.Q.C. became a Master of the Bench in Nov.2012.

An expert in
Fraud —the Doyen of Fraud Lawyers. —– so there.

This says a lot
about Banks — and their lawyers –the consensus of opinion is that
they are highly paid “crooks” —- no wonder they voted Ivan
Pictet banker of the year. — and Monty Raphael a Queens Counsellor
– “crime does pay”?

It appears that
crimes in the “establishment.” are honoured by their peers.

Comments Policy

We invite you to use our commenting platform to engage in insightful conversations about issues in our community. Although we do not pre-screen comments, we reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. We might permanently block any user who abuses these conditions.

If you see comments that you find offensive, please use the “Flag as Inappropriate” feature by hovering over the right side of the post, and pulling down on the arrow that appears. Or, contact our editors by emailing moderator@langnews.com.