CASH BALANCE LEGISLATION: MYTH VERSUS FACT

Transcription

1 CASH BALANCE LEGISLATION: MYTH VERSUS FACT MYTH # 1: EMPLOYERS PROTECT OLDER WORKERS FROM THE ADVERSE IMPACTS OF CONVERSIONS TO CASH BALANCE PLANS FACT: While some employers have protected their employees from some of the worst adverse impacts of a conversion, even cash balance supporters have acknowledged that "it is not unusual in some cash balance conversions for the 40 to 50 year old employee to lose one-third to as much as one-half of his expected pension." 1 A study of actual cash balance conversions conducted by the actuarial firm Towers & Perrin determined that in over one-third of the conversions the employers provided no transition protections whatsoever. 2 In 2002, a General Accounting Office (GAO) report documented the dramatic reduction in benefits for older workers: a 45-year old worker at the time of conversion receives an annual annuity of about $18,500 at retirement from the cash balance plan instead of the $39,800 annuity the worker could have received from the defined benefit plan with a final average pay formula. Likewise, a worker 50 years old at conversion receives an annual annuity of about $17,800 from the cash balance plan rather than the $35,100 annuity the final average pay formula would have provided GAO Report 3 AGE BEFORE CONVERSION ANNUITY AFTER CONVERSION TO CASH BALANCE ANNUITY 45 $39,800 $18,500 (-$21,300) 55 $35,100 $17,800 (-$17,300) Source: 2002 GAO Report 1 Shapiro & Rachal, Litigation Issues in Cash Balance Plans, Benefits Link, (1999), 2 Arcady & Mellors, Cash Balance Conversions, JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY (February 2000) 3 General Accounting Office, PRIVATE PENSIONS Implications of Conversions to Cash Balance Plans, GAO/HEHS , at (Sept. 2000) (hereinafter 2002 GAO Report ) at 28.

2 2 To make matters worse, some employers structure their conversions so that older employees often work for months or years without accruing additional pension benefits while similarly situated younger employees continue to accrue benefits. During a typical conversion, many older workers experience what is referred to as wearaway, which means that they continue working without earning additional pension benefits until the amount in their cash balance plan reaches the amount they had already earned under their traditional defined benefit plan. The GAO found that the amount of wearaway any employee experiences is tied directly to age. 4 Older workers suffer the longest periods of wearaway, which may last many years. For example, a typical conversion scenario generated a 2-year lump sum wearaway for a 35-year old worker, a 4-year wearaway for a 45-year old worker, and an 11-year wearaway for a 55-year old worker at conversion. In such an instance, the 55-year old would earn no additional pension benefit before reaching normal retirement age, in effect working the last decade for no corresponding retirement benefit. MYTH #2: EMPLOYERS DID NOT REALIZE WHEN THEY CONVERTED TO CASH BALANCE PLANS THAT THE PLANS MIGHT VIOLATE AGE DISCRIMINATION LAWS. FACT: From the earliest days of cash balance plans, the employer community recognized the very serious legal issues posed by the age discriminatory aspects of hybrid plans. In fact, as early as the mid-1980s benefits consultants were writing articles... panning cash balance plans, that they are a flash in the pan, that they are a gimmick, that they can t satisfy any of the rules. 5 Significantly, following an early meeting of what later became known as the Cash Balance Practitioner s Group in 1990, attendees which included representatives from four large pension consulting firms and two major law firms--circulated a memorandum acknowledging that it is well known that a [cash balance] plan is at risk under a literal reading of the age discrimination laws. The Working Group Report noted that a number of practitioners believe that there is a very significant risk that the [Internal Revenue] Service will ultimately take the view that it cannot avoid a literal interpretation of the statute. The group concluded that in the absence of a legislative fix, the potential employer exposure is extremely high potentially increasing the plan liabilities four or five times. The concerns of the Working Group Report were subsequently confirmed in an Internal Revenue Service document indicating that Onan Corporation s cash balance plan was not in legal compliance: This plan does not satisfy the clear and straightforward requirement of section GAO Report at Lawrence J. Sher, 1999 Enrolled Actuaries Meeting (March 14-17, 1999). 2

3 3 411(b)(1)(H)(i) of the Code because the plan s benefit accrual rate decreases as a participant attains each additional year of age. 6 MYTH # 3: AUTHORIZING CASH BALANCE PLANS WON T INCREASE THE PBGC S LIABILITY EXPOSURE. FACT: Authorizing cash balance plans will create significant additional liability exposure for the PBGC at the very time Congress is acting to reduce that exposure. It is indeed ironic that cash balance advocates would suggest that provisions encouraging the use of cash balance plans would be added to legislation designed to reduce PBGC liability exposure and suggestions that cash balances plans are like 401(k) plans or defined contribution plans are grossly misleading as neither of those plans generate PBGC exposure. Cash balance plans generate significant additional liability exposure to the PBGC because the leverage inherent in a cash balance plan creates funding issues should all benefits come due immediately as would happen in the event of a bankruptcy. 7 This is because even though cash balance plans promise to pay participants a benefit at any point in time which is equal to the employee s account balance, the plans are funded by employers on the basis of actuarial liability. The result is that, even when the plan is considered fully funded for PBGC purposes, the actuarial liability used for funding purposes will often be as little as 70% of the plan s current account balance liability thereby creating additional potential liability exposure to the PBGC. In addition to increasing the liability exposure of the PBGC, authorizing cash balance plans leaves a myriad of issues unresolved in terms of what benefits the PBGC will provide to employees covered by cash balance plans in the event of bankruptcy. Employees should not be left to guess what their benefits would be in the event their company fails and they are forced to look to the PBGC to provide their hard earned retirement benefits. MYTH # 4: EMPLOYERS NEED CASH BALANCE PLANS TO APPEAL TO TODAY S MORE MOBILE WORKFORCE. FACT: It is a total fiction that today s work force is more mobile. As Eric Lofgren, an actuary at Watson Wyatt, explained to the Society of Actuaries: [B]aby boomers have had the same level of mobility as their parents and grandparents when you look at people at the same age.... So far the boomers have been staying on the job longer, actually, than their parents and their grandparents. 8 Mr. Lofgren s comments are consistent with a study conducted in 1998 by his 6 Letter from Andrew J. Fedders, IRS Employee Plan Specialist, to District Director of the Internal Revenue Service regarding the Onan Corporation Pension Plan, July 28, Actuarial Aspects of Cash Balance Plans for The Society of Actuaries by Bolton Offutt Donovan, Inc. (July 7, 2000) at 6, Eric P. Lofgren, Remarks to the New York Annual Meeting of the Society of Actuaries (October 18-21, 1998). 3

4 4 firm which concluded that this phenomenon applied as well to younger workers, age 25 to 34, who in 1996 spent a considerably longer time, on average, with one employer than did workers in that same age group in the 1950 s. 9 More recently, the authors in the largest research study to date of conversions to cash balance plans concluded that they had found no support for claims that CB conversions are a response to labor markets with more mobile employees. 10 MYTH # 5: BY CONVERTING TO CASH BALANCE PLANS EMPLOYERS MAKE PENSIONS EASIER FOR THEIR EMPLOYEES TO UNDERSTAND AND APPRECIATE. FACT: More frequently, employers use a conversion to cash balance plans to hide benefit cutbacks. In 1986, shortly after the adoption of the first cash balance plan, Eric Lofgren, an actuary with Watson Wyatt, outlined for a conference of actuaries that a primary objective of conversions to a cash balance plan was to "to camouflage a benefit cutback, or remove early retirement subsidies." 11 Mr Lofgren even noted how a company converting to a cash balance plan could use two very different announcements for the same new cash balance plan. The upbeat version most commonly used to announce a conversion optimistically touts the purported virtues of a cash balance plan, describing it as an exciting, modern, flexible new plan design with the advantages of both defined benefit and defined contribution. He also suggested what he described as an equally accurate, but more candid, definition: Dear Employee: We ve got for you a cash balance pension plan. It s our way to disguise the cutbacks in your benefits. First we re going to change it to career average. We ll express the benefits as lump sum so we can highlight the use of the CPI, a submarket interest rate. What money is left in the plan will be directed towards employees who leave after just a few years. Just to make sure, we ll reduce early retirement subsidies. This ability to use conversions to mask cutbacks was still being touted in 1998, when an actuary with PricewaterhouseCoopers noted to the annual meeting of the Society of Actuaries that "converting to a cash balance plan does have an advantage of it masks a lot of the changes." 12 As a practical matter, conversions to cash balance plans also have been used to achieve artificial accounting gains. Existing accounting rules have allowed publicly held corporations to use cash balance conversions to generate "pension income." The company s increased bottom line presents a more attractive financial picture to the investing public. As Mark Beilke, chairman of the Academy of Actuaries Pension Accounting Committee, recently observed, financial statement "gains [from cash balance conversions are] mostly derived from 'accounting 9 Workforce Management: The Cultural Shift, Watson Wyatt Insider, Vol. 8, Issue 8, (August 1998). 10 D Souza, Jacob & Lougee, Why do Firms Convert to Cash Balance Pension Plans? An Empirical Investigation (December 2004)( Empirical Investigation ). 11 Remarks of Eric Lofgren, Vol. 12. No 1 Report of the Society of Actuaries, at 419 (1986). 12 Remarks of William Torrie, 1998 Society of Actuaries Annual Meeting, quoted in Ward, Eating their Words, Plan Sponsor Magazine (March, 2000) 4

5 5 gimmicks.'" 13 Similarly, William Sweetnam, then a member of the Senate Finance Committee staff and later a Treasury Department Tax Benefits Counsel, acknowledged in 1998 that the "primary reason cash balance plans are financially advantageous is the accounting treatment of cash balance plans versus final average earnings plans... So the reason that cash balance plans are better is that they make the corporations [sic] financial statement look better since pension liabilities are less." 14 Warren Buffet has described the practice by some companies of creating "phantom" pension income to inflate reported income as a misrepresentation that "dwarfs the lies of Enron and WorldCom." 15 MYTH # 6: EMPLOYERS DO NOT ADOPT CASH BALANCE PLANS TO REDUCE THEIR COSTS AT THE EXPENSE OF OLDER WORKERS. FACT: Employers repeatedly have converted to cash balance plans as a way to reduce their costs at the expense of older workers retirement benefits. For example, Chief Judge Murphy held in IBM v. Cooper that IBM s actuaries projected that IBM s 1999 conversion to a cash balance plan would produce annual savings of almost $500 million by Consistent with the voluminous anecdotal evidence, a survey of cash balance plan sponsors found that 56 % of firms expected the long-term cost of their defined benefit plans to decrease after conversion. Similarly, the largest study of cash balance conversions documented that firms with employees who are closer to retirement are more likely to convert to the CB format. It also concluded that the workplace of firms that undertake conversion to CB plans has had a longer tenure with the firm, on average lending credence to the claims of CB conversion opponents that firms benefit from these conversions at the expense of older workers. Empirical Investigation at 26 MYTH # 7: IF LEGISLATION ALLOWING CONVERSIONS TO CASH BALANCE PLANS IS NOT RETROACTIVE SOME 1,600 LARGE PENSION PLANS WITH HYBRID PLANS ARE LIKELY TO EITHER FREEZE OR TERMINATE THEIR PLANS. FACT: It is first important to note that even if you define large employers as those as few as 1,000 employees, according to the PBGC there are only approximately 625 such employers with hybrid pension plans. Putting aside the question of how many large employers have hybrid plans, it is clear that some employers and certain employer groups, such as ERIC, have threatened and will continue to threaten massive terminations in an attempt to scare Congress into giving them immunity for 13 Comments posted as MGB on Discussion Forum, May 13, from Bill Sweetnam to Stan Fendley, et al., dated Buffet, Who Really Cooks the Books?, New York Times, Section A, page 19 (July 24, 2002). 16 (Memorandum Opinion and Order at 16 (July 31, 2003).) 5

6 6 their prior illegal age discrimination. But whatever exposure they have today for their prior age discrimination, they will have the same exposure following the adoption of legislation without regard to whether they terminate or freeze their plan. In other words, prospective cash balance legislation would stop the growth of their future exposure but their existing exposure remains the same without regard to whether they continue, freeze or terminate their plan. In short, while it is a threat that the employers have used in the past and will undoubtedly continue to use, it is a red herring. What most employers ignore is that all that retroactivity eliminates is the potential liability with respect to past conduct -- benefits that employees have already accrued. Employers and employer groups are also reluctant to admit that most employers did not provide the kind of transitional protections included in the Senate Finance Committee bill. In other words, they will also have to persuade Congress to eliminate transitional protections against wearaway and other abuses or they won't get any benefit from retroactivity language inserted in the bill. 6

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of Inspector General PWBA Needs to Improve Oversight of Cash Balance Plan Lump Sum Distributions U.S. Department of Labor Office of Inspector General Report No. 09-02-001-12-121

You Have a Choice New Cash Balance Pension You Have a Choice The important thing to understand is this: If you were hired through December 31, 2012 you don t have to change to the new cash balance pension

VII Cash Balance Plans in a Traditional Defined Benefit World by Daniel R. McMonagle 1. Introduction This paper is a big picture discussion of cash plans and how they fit into the regulatory environment

Important Information Legislation November 2006 Pension Protection Act of 2006 Makes Significant Changes to Single Employer Defined Benefit Plans This is one of a series of Pension Analyst publications

Order Code RL30631 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Retirement Benefits for Members of Congress Updated January 21, 2005 Patrick J. Purcell Specialist in Social Legislation Domestic

IRS Issues Final and Proposed Hybrid Plan Regulations October 2010 Date Aon Hewitt 2010 Hewitt Associates LLC Brief Description: On October 18, 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released final and

What is a Pension Equity Plan? by L. Bernard Green Originally Posted:October 29, 2003 To meet the needs of workers who hold a number of jobs throughout their lives, employers continue to seek new kinds

COMPENSATION & EMPLOYEE BENEFITS LAW BULLETIN A BIRDSEYE VIEW OF THE PENSION PROTECTION ACT OF 2006 The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the Act ) is arguably the most comprehensive pension reform legislation

Statement of Tom Roberts Chief Counsel, ING Insurance U.S. On Behalf Of The American Council of Life Insurers Before The Department of Labor/Department of the Treasury Lifetime Income Hearing September

Freezing Defined Benefit Pension Plans The Process & Post-Freeze Issues David N. Levine Lars C. Golumbic Groom Law Group, Chartered Anyone who picks up a paper or magazine these days can find a story or

VOL. 28, NO. 1 SPRING 2015 BENEFITS LAW JOURNAL Longevity Plans: An Answer to the Decline of the Defined Benefit Plan William Most and Zorast Wadia With people living longer and the undeniable shift from

May 28, 2015 Testimony of Craig Rosenthal on behalf of the American Benefits Council Before the ERISA Advisory Council on Model Notices and Disclosures for Pension Risk Transfers My name is Craig Rosenthal

POLICY BRIEF Visit us at: www.tiaa-crefinstitute.org. September 2004 The 2004 Report of the Social Security Trustees: Social Security Shortfalls, Social Security Reform and Higher Education The 2004 Social

INDIANA PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEM Understanding Indiana s Largest Pension System March 27, 2015 Funds Overview The Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) includes the two largest public retirement plans

Institutional Retirement and Trust Is a cash balance plan right for your organization? Since the first cash balance plan was established in 1985, many employers, both large and small, have adopted this

LGPS 2014 - FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS THE BACKGROUND TO LGPS 2014 Why is another new scheme being introduced? The Coalition government came to power with a clear agenda to change public sector pensions,

Statement of Andrew D. Pike * Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law American University, Washington College of Law before the Senate Finance Committee October 24, 2003 Mr. Chairman and

Actuarial Speak 101 Terms and Definitions Introduction and Caveat: It is intended that all definitions and explanations are accurate. However, for purposes of understanding and clarity of key points, the

Information Release August 2003 Section 412(i) Pension Plans An Old Plan or a New Gimmick? Section 412(i) pension plans are being marketed to sole proprietors and other small employers as an alternative

IPPR speech Pension reform in the public services 23 June 2011 Good morning everybody. Can I start by thanking the IPPR for giving me this opportunity to say a few words about pension reform in the public

An Integrated Approach to Pension Benefits by William J. Ruschau The search for the perfect pension system, like the search for the Holy Grail, continues to prove elusive. The economic collapse of 2008

Variable Annuity Pension Plans an Emerging Retirement Plan Design Variable annuity pension plans (VAPPs) are not new but may deserve a second look by plan sponsors seeking a more secure retirement plan

employee benefits update february/march 2013 It s time to reap the benefits of matching contributions Can you define compensation? A review of IRS definitions that affect qualified plans Offsetting stagnant

Pension plan terminations: Minimizing cost and risk Vanguard commentary May 2011 It is well understood and accepted these days that the nature of a pension plan s liability affects its investment strategy

WILL YOUR RETIREMENT PLAN RETIRE WITH YOU? UNDERSTANDING YOUR RETIREMENT PLAN OPTIONS Is Your Employer Retirement Plan Working for You? Whether you re changing jobs or retiring, knowing what to do with

Annual Funding Notice for Retirement Plan for Staff Employees Introduction This notice includes important funding information about your pension plan ( the Plan ). This notice also provides a summary of

CASH BALANCE PLAN PRIMER Cash balance plans: Have features of both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. Can be designed to be generous, reasonable or inadequate, but will be more costly if the

Social Security Disability Backlogs Statement of Sylvester J. Schieber, Chairman Social Security Advisory Board To the Subcommittee on Social Security of the Committee on Ways and Means U.S. House of Representatives

April 15, 2015 Senate Finance Committee Public Hearing Hearing Room 1, North Office Building, Capitol Complex, Harrisburg, PA Dear Members of the Committee, Thank you for the opportunity to provide testimony

Defending DROP: OP&F sets the record straight about a report from the Buckeye Institute: Dipped in Gold A report recently released by the Buckeye Institute attacks the Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP)

GUIDE TO RETIREMENT PLANNING Making the most of the new pension rules to enjoy freedom and choice in your retirement FINANCIAL GUIDE WELCOME Making the most of the new pension rules to enjoy freedom and

from Personal Financial Services IRAs, pensions and other retirement savings vehicles February 27, 2014 In brief Qualified plans and IRAs are an essential part of retirement and tax planning for many individuals.

U.S. Treasury Securities U.S. Treasury Securities 4.6 Nonmarketable To help finance its operations, the U.S. government from time to time borrows money by selling investors a variety of debt securities

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York NY 10003-0987 April 2015 Dear Consolidated Edison Retirement Plan Participant: The Consolidated Edison Retirement Plan is subject to

Defined Benefit Retirement Plan Summary Plan Description This booklet is not the Plan document, but only a summary of its main provisions and not every limitation or detail of the Plan is included. Every

Basics of Corporate Pension Plan Funding A White Paper by Manning & Napier www.manning-napier.com Unless otherwise noted, all figures are based in USD. 1 Introduction In general, a pension plan is a promise

Let s talk pension flexibility The current position 1 Let s talk pension flexibility the current position Change is coming. Budget 2014 heralded a shake-up of the pension system that will change how we

Understanding Actuarial Information By Richard H. Harris Annual required contributions for state and local government pension plans are based on plan data, plan provisions, and actuarial assumptions of

The American Council of Life Insurers Written Statement for the Record for Tax Reform and Tax-Favored Retirement Accounts Committee on Ways and Means United States House of Representatives April 17, 2012

TREASURY FACT SHEET: HELPING AMERICAN FAMILIES ACHIEVE RETIREMENT SECURITY BY EXPANDING LIFETIME INCOME CHOICES In September 2009, President Obama announced several new steps to make it easier for American

This Report is brought to you by... Other Companies Make Promises -- We Make Dreams Come True! We Offer QUALITY CONTENT in Every WAY, TYPE and FORM Exclusive WOW Private Label Releases Private Label Products

ANNUAL FUNDING NOTICE For THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PENSION PLAN FOR STAFF EMPLOYEES Introduction This notice includes important information about the funding status of your single employer pension plan

What Annuities Can (and Can t) Do for Retirees With proper handling and expectations, annuities are powerful retirement income tools Illustration by Enrico Varrasso A 65-year old American male has a 10%

Actuarial Speak 101 Terms and Definitions Introduction and Caveat: It is intended that all definitions and explanations are accurate. However, for purposes of understanding and clarity of key points, the

Welcome to NEST All the key information you need about being a member of NEST 2 Please write your NEST ID here: You ll find this number on the letter that came with this booklet. Welcome to NEST Building

Social Security and Financial Planning William Arnone Chair, Board of Directors National Academy of Social Insurance June, 2015 What Role Does Social Security Play in Financial Planning? 2 It s more than

GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate January 2008 STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT RETIREE BENEFITS Current Funded Status of Pension and Health Benefits

Planning a prosperous retirement Towry s Guide to Retirement Planning About Towry We are one of the UK s leading Wealth Advisers and specialise in providing high quality, expert financial advice to private

2014 Managing Financial Risk in Retirement and Benefits Programs Translating Awareness into Action A report prepared by CFO Research in collaboration with Prudential Financial, Inc. Contents Research Sponsor

STATEMENT of JOHN O'BRIEN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND POLICY ANALYSIS U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT before the THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

The path to retirement success How important are your investment and spending strategies? In this VIEW, Towers Watson Australia managing director ANDREW BOAL reports on investing for retirement success

Employee Costs and Risks in 401(k) Plans The rapid growth of employer-sponsored 401(k) plans has been facilitated, in part, by the many advantages offered to participants. However, employees also may encounter

Planning for the Stages of _ Retirement _ Retirement is being reinvented. It s no longer our parent s retirement. Social Security alone w o n t see us through retirement, especially for higher income earners.