Hi and thanks for visiting the best Ravens forum on the planet. You do not have to be a member to browse the various forums, but in order to post and interact with your purple brethren, you will have to **register**. It only takes a couple of minutes. You can also use your Facebook account to log in....just click on the blue 'FConnect' link at the very top of the page.

Re: conspiracy?

Re: conspiracy?

Conspiracy or not, neither team was able to sneak in touchdowns during the darkness. They were equally disadvantaged.

The Steelers year-end fade has a lot more to due with the age of its players than the San Francisco lighting. I won't be shocked to see them lose to the Browns next week; hopefully, that won't be necessary, but the Ravens at Bengals is scary.

In a 2003 BBC poll that asked Brits to name the "Greatest American Ever", Mr. T came in fourth, behind ML King (3rd), Abe Lincoln (2nd) and Homer Simpson (1st).

Re: conspiracy?

Originally Posted by Mista T

Conspiracy or not, neither team was able to sneak in touchdowns during the darkness. They were equally disadvantaged.

The Steelers year-end fade has a lot more to due with the age of its players than the San Francisco lighting. I won't be shocked to see them lose to the Browns next week; hopefully, that won't be necessary, but the Ravens at Bengals is scary.

Re: conspiracy?

I don't think he ever stated it "hurt the Steelers." I pretty much knew somebody would state that. He never said it is why they lost, or that if it was done intentionally, that it was to benefit the 49's, sheesh.

Please read before reacting.

Originally Posted by RavensRock

But Steve Young and the rest of the ESPN "experts" said the outages would hurt the 49ers more. Who more of an idiot? The ESPN "experts" or Ryan Clark?

Re: conspiracy?

Clearly no one actually read the article. Clark wasn't talking about it being a disadvantage for the Steelers, he was accusing the San Fran government of using it as a way to showcase to the NFL that they need a new stadium.