"Evapotranspiration alone does not
guarantee that the hydrological cycle is getting faster. It is well known
(e.g., Brutsaert-Parlange 1998) that the evaporation has decreased in the last
50 years in many parts of the world while the clouds and the precipitation have
increased in the same period. And the evaporation from free water surfaces is
much higher than the evapotranspiration from plants and soils.

Because the world was aware only
on the knowledge of the conventional or natural water cycle, this decreased
evaporation-increased clouds and precipitation led to the incomprehension
called “evaporation paradox”, which is now correctly solved in the article “The
Physical Principles Elucidate Numerous Atmospheric Behaviors and Human-Induced
Climatic Consequences” through the true physical principles, in contrast to the
nonsense empirical “solutions” by Brutsaert-Parlange 1998 and by
Roderick-Farquhar 2002, for example.

Furthermore, the natural
hydrological cycle is not only getting faster (due to other reasons), but it is
changed, and changed according to the New Hydrological Cycle discovered by
Sartori. The empirical science on global warming is able to think only about
the CO2 and thus does not see the correct human influence and the relevant
atmospheric behaviors with their consequences that affect the air
directly.

The conventional water cycle says
that Precipitation = Evaporation. However, if I throw one drop of water to the
air this equation must be modified to

Precipitation = Evaporation + One
drop.

This is what the New
Hydrological Cycle establishes. Of course, one drop doesn’t matter but only one fossil fuel
power plant of 600 MW can throw to the air more than 2,400,000 kg/h =
57,600,000 kg/day of water. If we concentrate such emissions in one square
meter, this figure will become equal to 21,024,000,000 kg/yr m2. Remember, this
is only for one power plant of 600 MW! Meanwhile, one millimeter in a square
meter corresponds to one liter or to one kilogram. Thus, 1.18 mm/year
corresponds to 1.18 kg/yr m2. It seems that the water emissions by only one
power plant are much higher than 1.18 kg/yr m2 and cause much more clouds and
precipitation than the evapotranspiration…

Moreover, considering the
corresponding latent heat for this power plant we obtain 1,507,266,667 W/m2.
This is equal to 2,153,238 times (!!) the very good solar radiation of 700
W/m2, which also means that the sun is not the only heat source for the
atmosphere. These enormous mass and heat added constantly and directly to the
atmosphere by certain human activities cause much more damage to the climate
than the indirect and supposed high consequences by the CO2 and its radiation.
By the way, the air temperature does not depend only on the radiation heat
transfer and thus the “hockey stick” and everything that comes from such
understanding and application is invalid, ingenuous and erroneous.

You can learn much more through
the paper mentioned above as well as through the other one titled “Climate
Changes: How the Atmosphere Really Works”.

You want to hide the New Hydrological Cycle and other correct and relevant discoveries but you cannot run from them! OK, continue thinking empirically and dedicating all of your efforts on the irrelevant and erroneous CO2 and on its radiation and giving importance only to your mafia journals and then you will lead the world to the hole, not to the proper solutions for the humanity".