Sunday, March 5, 2017

State: Nursing home’s failure to ‘provide adequate care’ led to beating death

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — The New York State Department
of Health cited Emerald South Nursing and Rehabilitation Center for
failing to provide adequate care to its residents, specifically, the
84-year-old dementia patient who beat Ruth Murray to death last August.

Those are regulations are in place to keep residents, like the 82-year-old Murray safe.

Instead, the department of health says the nursing home’s negligence
is the reason Murray was attacked after wandering into the man’s room on
Aug. 26.

As a result of its investigation, the state leveled its stiffest fine — $10,000 — against the facility.

News 4 is not naming Murray’s attacker because he was never charged with a crime.

Mike Scinta, of the Brown Chiari law firm, represents the Murray family.

“What we see here is they failed both residents,” Scinta said. “They
failed not only Ms. Murray, who suffered the fatal injuries, but they
also failed the attacker because he was supposed to be watched as well
every 15 minutes, which clearly did not happen.”

A News 4 investigation into Murray’s death found Emerald South
repeatedly violated state and federal regulations, which led to the
facility’s one-star rating.

But the vast majority of residents at the home on Delaware Avenue
receive Medicaid or Medicare, and former employees say the facility has a
heads-in-beds approach — keep the rooms full and the money flowing.

An investigation into the beating death of Murray by the department of health found multiple deficiencies.

“This family has been devastated by the manner in which their mother
died,” Scinta said. “And to see a report like this, and to know that
there’s ongoing systemic problems in the facility, it makes them very
angry and very frustrated with the fact that this facility can do this
time and time again.”

The department of health found Emerald South did not ensure each
resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. As one
example, they failed to check on Murray’s attacker every 15 minutes,
which was part of his care plan.

The department’s investigation found the CNA (Certified Nurse
Assistant) who was assigned to Murray’s attacker on the day of the
beating was out of the building running an errand for her team leader,
and the next time she laid eyes on the man was after the incident.

“The facility chooses to under staff itself,” Scinta said. “They
don’t have enough hands on deck to take care of the residents, and in
turn what happens is things get missed or ignored, and simply not done.
And people aren’t protected. Because of their failures, Ms. Murray is
now dead.”

When it came to reporting the fatal beating to authorities, Emerald South failed three as well, the state report showed.

The department of health wasn’t notified about the incident until
Aug. 28th, two days after it happened — when the report said they should
have been notified within 24 hours.

Buffalo attorney Richard Sullivan represents Emerald South, but has
not returned repeated calls for comment about the state’s investigation
or the impending lawsuit by attorneys representing Murray’s family.

Willie Faulkner lived across the street from the 84-year-old man.

Faulkner cared for his neighbor, and was ultimately one of the
reasons why he was sent to Emerald South after he could no longer care
for himself.

“That’s not the type of facility that I would go to if I had to go to
one,” said Faulkner, who visited his neighbor and other residents at
Emerald South.

It’s a place Faulkner says he remembered all too well for all the wrong reasons.

“The day that I went in, he was in the room with nothing,” Faulkner
said of his visit with his neighbor. “He didn’t have anything. There was
nothing on the bed. He may have had a pillow behind him, but it didn’t
have a pillow case on it. It didn’t have no sheets on the bed, no
nothing on the bed. No dresser.

“There was nothing. Bare walls and a bed. And his robe from the hospital,” he added.

There were other deficiencies about the facility’s care of Murray and
her attacker, some of which were not connected with the violent
incident.

The state found Emerald South had no documented evidence of an
admission agreement for Murray’s attacker, which is a state requirement.

The department’s investigation led them to the nursing home’s
business office, where a female employee told the investigator Murray’s
attacker’s agreement “fell to the wayside,” and that she was “very busy
because she was working for both buildings.”

“We know that this is pervasive throughout the facility because of
their failure to staff the facility and their failure to follow the care
plans, other residents are affected, and other residents in that
building are at risk,” Scinta said.

“They want heads in beds, and they want to keep their facilities
full, and that’s the way they operate their business,” he said. “But in
doing that, in exchange of that, they have to have enough people there
to properly care for these individuals.”

Follow NASGA's Facebook Page

Twitter Updates

Twitter Updates

Follow NASGA on Linked-in

Google+ Followers

Help Support NASGA!

Another great way to donate to NASGA is by doing your online shopping with Goodshop!
They will donate up to 20% of your purchases back to us and offer great savings at places like Neiman Marcus, Adidas, and Sundance Catalog.
So, you can save money and help us stop guardian abuse too!

Follow by Email

NASGA supports

Disclaimer

Victim stories are written and submitted by individual victims. NASGA has no knowledge or responsibility as to the accuracy or validity of their statements. Use of any such story or information contained therein in any manner is not authorized without prior written consent from NASGA or the individual author.

Comments on this site are moderated. NASGA reserves the right to accept, reject or delete any comments posted. Comments are the sole responsibility of the sender.

This site contains links to web sites controlled or offered by third parties (non-affiliates of NASGA).

NASGA hereby disclaims liability for any information, material, products, services, or any other, posted or offered at any of the third-party sites. By creating a link to a third-party site, NASGA does not endorse or recommend any products or services offered. NASGA further disclaims liability for the content, security, validity or accuracy contained in said third-party sites.

NASGA Followers

NASGA

NASGA (National Association to STOP Guardian Abuse, Inc.) is a 501(c)(3) public-interest, civil rights organization formed by victims of unlawful and abusive guardianships and conservatorships. We seek legislative reform of existing law and upgrading of criminal penalties for court-appointed fiduciaries misusing protective proceedings for unjust enrichment and engaging in elder and family abuse.

Our mission is to promote the safety and well being of vulnerable persons subject to injury and damage in their person and property through unlawful and abusive guardianship and/or conservatorship proceedings; to end the growing violations of due process, civil and human rights; to work towards ultimate legislative reform of guardianship as presently practiced; upgrading of criminal penalties for court-appointed fiduciaries misusing protective proceedings for unjust enrichment; and to be a support organization for victims and their families. We carry out our mission through research, outreach, education and advocacy; and going forward, by alliance with community interest, law reform, civil rights and other advocacy organizations.

Any copyrighted material included herein is distributed in accordance with the Fair Use section of 17 U.S.C. 107, in the interest of public research and education, without profit.

NASGA claims no credit for any images posted on this site. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it to appear here, please E-mail at Info@StopGuardianAbuse.org with a link to the image and we will promptly remove it.

Comments and opinions posted to our Blog are our readers - not NASGA. We do not censor comments, and we welcome opposing views. We do reserve the right, however, to delete any submitted comment which contains foul or obscene language.

Please visit our website by clicking the link below for more information on how you can help stop guardianship / conservatorship abuse.