If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Hybrid View

First flaw of SRT - Einstein's motivation axle

First flaw of SRT - Einstein's motivation axle

The theory of special relativity had been began by accepting Maxwell's definition about light's propagation, but its analysis was ended by verifing FitzGerald contraction. Asknown, FitzGerald contraction is a prophecy to revive/retain aether concept/claim and it has not any evidence. It is an ad-hoc hypothesis.

In Einstein's time, young scientists were saying that a person (who can generate an experimental evidence for Fitzgerald contraction) will get Nobel prize. In my opinion this phrase was Einstein's motivation axle; Einstein's aim was not to improve "Light Kinematics". He had has passion mystic/romantic in science area; he was looking for new amazing compass events.

However I generated an experimental evidence that can confuted/veto the contraction:

If length contraction is real, the electrical resistance value of a conductive cable must be changed in accordance with its different directions because of its universal motion. Our electrical resistance based experiment did not indicate an evidence for the length contraction; all measured values are isotropic and same.

Einstein had used inconvenient parameters (that have not equivalent) in formulas of SR. because the parameter ' v ' is a local value of the "moving body" according to Earth or rails; and the 'c' is a universal value * (according to macro reference system : Space or LCS). The parameters have not scientific integrity.

Human mind generally prefers easiness and short ways; it has ability of complementariness (*). For example, he/she measures the value of a speed and he/she may directly label it as a relative value or escaping speed according to local place; because his mechanical/local habits are dominant.

Einstein and others (almost everyone) had this attitude.They had accepted/labeled the all measured value of any speed as escaping speed from local place.

(*) Besides, experimentalist always interprets the results according to his initial intention.

If we intent to measure universal velocity of the light, we would use same measuring experiment (double paths, uninterrupted light, mirrors...) and at this time we would label/call the result by coding "universal velocity of light. And this option would be correct according to absolute reality.

Intrinsically, we can measure merely universal velocity of the light (according to most external frame/ space/LCS: light coordinate system).

Experimental evidence of this determination: The measured light's velocity values are isotropic (the same for every directions)

Last edited by Ersanozgen; 01-30-2018 at 10:33 AM.

My submissions are from my book (Pseudo Science/Sahte Bilim) and my published articles. Please indicate for citation.

Mr. Rybczyk has internalized about flaws of the theory SR and shared serious/scientific arguments. Also me and some ones has worked about same subject by some different arguments. It can be indicated that this theory is wrong to Z from A.

Intrinsically, If a student has cognitive innocence, he can find a flaw of SR at first reading:

The theory claims that time dilation (deformation of dimention) will be realized because of the fixity of light's velocity according to a moving body. The same theory says that a deformation is not realized because of perpendicular light's projection/drop line.

Now, how do two tempos work at a/same clock simultaneously? And infinite number of tempos for other directions ?

Last edited by Ersanozgen; 01-31-2018 at 04:19 AM.

My submissions are from my book (Pseudo Science/Sahte Bilim) and my published articles. Please indicate for citation.

As known Copernicus had discovered that the World turns around the Sun. This turning is orbital rotation. Whereas, Galilei's claim was axial rotation. People had an opinion/determination that the Sun turns around the World (this dogma was experimental based; the reason of this dogma is Earth's axial rotation). Galilei had canceled this dogma.

The essence of Galilei event (or this dogma) is to give reference role to a relative object. We don't mistake for the relation the World and Moon; because the reference and relative roles are fitted/correct.

If a relativity relation will set between two objects, reference role must be give to the object that has higher capacity (If a co-reference frame is possible, this option must be preferred). To assign a local or a sub object (according to hierarcical ranking) as reference frame can cause wrong perception.

Here, the reason of SR's failure (to assign a weakest object/candidate as a reference frame) . We must consider most external frame for light kinematics's analyses.

Energy and light have highest universal qualities and coverage capacity.Everything can be explained by energy concept.

If a relation is wanted to set for the light and a moving body/source. The light deserves the reference role. Naturally, to use the light as a reference frame seems a difficulty. Nature never care this difficulty.

However, we can assign the outer space or Light Coordinate System (LCS) as co-reference frame. Practically, in theoretical analyses we can use a sheet of paper instead of LCS.

Last edited by Ersanozgen; 02-01-2018 at 03:24 AM.

My submissions are from my book (Pseudo Science/Sahte Bilim) and my published articles. Please indicate for citation.

If a relativity relation will set between two objects, reference role must be give to the object that has higher capacity (If a co-reference frame is possible, this option must be preferred). To assign a local or a sub object (according to hierarcical ranking) as reference frame can cause wrong perception.

Here, the reason of SR's failure (to assign a weakest object/candidate as a reference frame) . We must consider most external frame for light kinematics's analyses.(*)

However, we can assign the outer space or Light Coordinate System (LCS) as co-reference frame. Practically, for theoretical analyses we can use a sheet of paper as LCS.

(*)This is a methodological principle or fifth dimension for light kinematics. Probably, Einstein and others had ignored this requirement.

My submissions are from my book (Pseudo Science/Sahte Bilim) and my published articles. Please indicate for citation.