Abstract

This paper explores a perceived social problem in the UK from a critical discourse analysis perspective. The problem is that of divorced fathers’ lack of access to a family relationship with their children. To explore it, I examine one of the legal forms used to determine child residence after divorce. I first analyse the ways in which this text represents mothers’ and fathers’ relationships with their children. I then go on to analyse the form as part of a legal exchange between individuals and official bureaucracy. I conclude not only that the form fails to facilitate equal legal rights for all parties concerned, but also that it fails to serve children’s best interests due to its perpetration of gender stereotypes.