Gronk is probably just tired of the BB thing and being part of an organization whos corporate model is to CHEAT!!
—————————————————————————
All 32 teams are part of that organization.

So unless Gronk wants to go play in the CFL or retire he has to be a part of that organization. The same organization that still hasn’t released the PSI information that was collected during the 2015 NFLS season.

The same organization that duped so many gullible dimwits into believing that someone deflated the Colts footballs AND the Patriots footballs in order to give the Patriots an advantage.

‘Where’s the restructure of his contract?’” an unnamed AFC personnel executive told Bedard. “Until that’s done, I think he’s still available. I wouldn’t be surprised if [Bill] Belichick is going to test Gronk’s buy-in with the contract.’”

Unnamed official from another team who has no vested interest in Gronk’s status.
“Thinks” he’s still available.
“Wouldn’t be surprised”…

Outstanding information.

]]>
By: tylawspick6 https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283537
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:23:44 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283537mzew233 says:
July 9, 2018 at 10:09 pm
Who cares really. But no — Brady made it clear if Gronk doesnt play hes out. Also GRONK would flat out retire and move into the Rock’s basement if he were traded. Kraft knows this, Belichick knows this, everyone knows this.

Stop putting ideas out there.

4 2 Rate This

——————————

Who are you, Giselle? Brady “made it clear”? He did? When? Where?

]]>
By: tylawspick6 https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283535
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:22:25 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283535binkystevens says:
July 10, 2018 at 10:06 am
I must be missing something fairly obvious, but why would anyone want to trade for a guy who seriously considered retirement this offseason? Way too much risk that he decides to throw in the towel and you never reap the reward for the draft picks you sent.

1 0 Rate This

————————

He wasn’t considering retirement. Even the mere threat of dealing Gronk around the draft scared him straight.

He’s looking for money. He’s been quietly and passive-aggressively been whining about it for the last 3 offseasons.

5-7 owners will then demand another framejob from Goodell to then steal those picks as punishment.

lmao

]]>
By: binkystevens https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283520
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:06:03 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283520I must be missing something fairly obvious, but why would anyone want to trade for a guy who seriously considered retirement this offseason? Way too much risk that he decides to throw in the towel and you never reap the reward for the draft picks you sent.
]]>
By: crush22 https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283508
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:56:20 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283508Glasskowski*
]]>
By: pats777 https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283505
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:54:01 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283505Is Jerry Jones still senile? Is Mark Davis still trying to bring back the bowl cut? So. Many. Questions.
]]>
By: ibillwt https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283494
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:46:00 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283494don’t care. as long as belichick is coaching i’m interested in the nfl and he can pick his players.
]]>
By: silvernblacksabbath https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283479
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:24:12 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283479It depends on how much longer Belichick will coach. If he plans on retiring after this year or next year (they’ll win one at least), they’ll keep Gronk.
]]>
By: PAUL SOUSA https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283468
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:15:11 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283468If Greg Bedard said it then it is a 100% fabricated story. He just quotes ‘Unnamed Executives’ or ‘Sources’. He knows he won’t be called out on it.

He will keep doing this in hope the payoff is it brings attention to his pay for content site.

]]>
By: 49erfan44 https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283269
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:19:14 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283269Niners for a 2nd
]]>
By: patsfan1820 https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283259
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 05:33:44 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283259I doubt Gronk will be traded this year unless they get multiple picks or a 1st for him. The only teams I see trying to offer that are San Fran, Cleveland, and San Diego and I highly doubt any of them will do that.
]]>
By: biggs13 https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283215
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 03:36:10 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283215If he gets moved Brady will ask for a trade next season or retire.
]]>
By: belichickdominatedjoemontana https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/07/09/is-gronkowski-still-available-in-trade/#comment-6283190
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 03:18:38 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2538572#comment-6283190If a trade ever happens, it won’t happen until at least March.

They are going for one more Supee Bowl with Gronk. Plus, Gronk has 2 years left on ha deal.