Tuesday, December 11, 2018

Katowice, Poland ... I’ve been at COP21 for nearly two weeks and will be heading
home soon. I’ve been asked by friends
back in California what it’s like and why I’m spending so much time here. COP24 is my fourth COP climate summit. My first was the landmark COP21 in Paris in
2015.

The setting is Polish coal country.The host town of Katowice was a major coal
producer until their mine closed down around 2001.All that’s left of the mine is a museum where
you can descend into the old shaft and see what it was like for the miners who
supplied the energy source that made modern Poland possible.

The Spodek Arena, Cop24 Venue

The COP24 meeting site is centered around a futuristic arena
with a look somewhat like the Starship Enterprise on top of the reclaimed coal
mine.Though this locality is making the
transition away from coal and is proud of their newer tourism and service
industries, the greater region still relies on coal.On the way from my AirBNB to the venue every
day, I pass over a railroad track where I can see a line-up of coal-laden
railway cars heading to a nearby powerplant.

Poland gets a significant portion (about 80%) of their power
from coal and their government, despite hosting the climate summit, expects a
much-too-slow transition to other power sources. Poland plans to reduce their
coal power generation to around 60% by 2030.

Over 22,000 participants from governments, research
institutions, media, non-governmental organizations and many others have
travelled to southern Poland for many climate reasons.The statistics below show nearly 14,000
representatives of 198 governments are here.This is somewhat deceiving as country delegations have many guests.

COP24 Participant Statistics

Participants have many reasons for coming to a COP.Government ministers and their staff
negotiate the minute details of the climate agreements and implementation
documents.Scientist present their
latest findings.Governments and some
organizations showcase their climate work and hold seminars in their
“pavilions.”Non-governmental
organizations try to influence the proceedings, connect with partners around
the world, hold media events, or otherwise try to impact global climate
efforts.

At the COP, there are large meetings of country
representatives to review and approve the latest agreements and documents that
govern the implementation of the Paris Agreement and related agreements.These aren’t developed in a vacuum.Rather, they are discussed, reviewed and
dissected at seemingly endless meetings of “subsidiary bodies” and other groups
of government representatives.Most of
these are open and many of the non-government participants monitor and attempt
to influence these proceedings.

Single words can cause great debate.An extreme example occurred when the US (i.e.
Trump Administration) aligned itself with Russia, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait to
object to the submission of a scientific report.At COP21, governments asked their scientific
advisory body to work with the leading scientists of the world to report back
on the potential and implications of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees
centigrade.

Meeting Tom Steyer at COP24

That report was submitted in time for COP24 and it paints a
stark picture of carbon emissions, calling for a very quick reduction and
ultimately net-zero level of carbon emissions.An innocuous resolution to “welcome” the findings of this report was
objected to by the four countries, including the US.They would rather just acknowledge that the
report exists than give credence to the findings.They are pushing for language to “take note” of the
work of the scientists rather than welcome the findings. In a

statement, the US said, “the United States was willing to note the report and express appreciation to the scientists who developed it, but not to welcome it, as that would denote endorsement of the report." The US isn’t winning any friends here as it as it moves towards the Trump-imposed withdrawal from the COP proceedings in 2020. A side note on all of this … there are two groups of US representatives at the COP, the policy and political folks from the Department of Energy, State Department and elsewhere. There are also career State Department employees who know how to professionally handle international relations. I am told the career folks are handling their tasks honorably and should the US re-engage on climate issues, will be welcomed back into the process.

For many of us the discussions among the country
representatives are a small portion of what’s going on.At any time, there are several dozen “side
events.”There are so many side events,
that it can be a major challenge discovering which ones may be of
interest.I attend these side events for
several reasons, including connecting with new and old acquaintances, learning
the latest in areas of interest, and supporting people I know who have
organized or are speaking at the events.There are also regular press conferences and some of the groups I’m
involved with use these to convey information about the COP process or broader
climate related information.The UN
makes footage of these press conferences available online.An example of one I assisted with is here.

Hallway in Country Pavillion Area, COP24

Acronyms abound at the COP, starting with “COP” itself (Conference
of the Parties of the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change). LGMA is a Local Government and Municipal
Authority.Youth participate as YOUNGOs(Youth Non-Governmental Organizations).Academic and other research entities are
RINGOs (Research and Independent Non-Governmental Organizations).Business groups are part of the BINGO group
(Business and Industry Non-Governmental Organizations).

The list goes on and on for both participants and what
they’re talking about.In the COP
context, NAPA is not a wine growing region .. it is a “National Adaptation
Program of Action.”A LEG is not a body
part.Rather, it is the “Least Developed
Countries Expert Group.”The UNFCCC has
a long glossary of acronyms and terms for the acronym-confused (here)
like me.The list even includes “NN” for
“Not Named.”No further explanation of
NN is given.

I’m here with a few organizations.

I’ve been a long-time Board Member of the InterEnvironment
Institute, a California based public policy center that works on a
variety of internationally important environmental issues, including natural
areas within or contiguous to urban centers, connecting conservation areas and
environmental programs to museums and other partners, and collaborative problem
solving.Thanks to the accreditation the
Institute enjoys with the Unite Nations, I am able to obtain the necessary
credentials to enter the main venue of the COP.

I’m also on the Board of Solar Cookers International
(SCI), an organization that promotes human and environmental health through support
of carbon-free solar cooking.Last year,
I helped introduce SCI to COP and it has turned out to be a very useful venue to
promote solar cooking.We analyzed all
of the country-specific climate plans and found that few mention cooking as an
issue and even fewer mention solar cooking (see analysis here).

Because SCI has an affiliate in England, the UK government
allowed us to display a solar cooker and use their pavilion space to meet with
interested people for the first week of the COP (it lasts two weeks).Our display was in one of the busiest areas
of the facility and were in constant conversation with country representatives
and others interested in deploying more solar cookers in their region,
especially in Africa and south Asia.For
the second week, SCI has booth space for similar interactions with
participants.The connections are
significant.As I write this, SCI staff
is preparing to attend a dinner with Nepal government representatives, have
their third press conference and consider invitations to consult with several
African and south Asian countries on improving solar cooker deployment.

Michael Paparian and Climate Bonds Initiative Head Sean Kidney

The other organization I work with is the Climate Bonds
Initiative (CBI).CBI
promotes the use of green bonds for infrastructure and other projects.I worked on green bonds when I was with the
California Treasurer and I continue to believe they offer a necessary framework
for funding infrastructure and other projects. The specific effort I’m working on is to
promote the Green
Bond Pledge.At COP24, I’m participating
in finance related side events about green bonds and meeting local government
officials and others to promote the pledge and other green bond work.I even met with two California legislators at
COP24 to brief them on how the green bond market could expand with California
leadership.

I attended several sessions with the scientists working on
climate issues.I’ve done this at every
COP to improve my understanding of what we truly know about climate change.The mood of the scientists feels much different
than prior COPs.They are more direct,
more specific and seem much more scared about what they are conveying.They know sea level is rising, temperatures
are rising and extreme weather events are getting worse.They’re telling us that we have 12 years to
dramatically reduce carbon emissions ratcheting up quickly to get to a 50%
reduction in emissions.We then have until
2050 to get to net-zero carbon emissions.In 2018, worldwide carbon emissions actually INCREASED.There’s even quiet talk of a “runaway climate
change” scenario if we don’t get emissions under control soon.

US States, Local Governments and others
proclaim "We Are Still In" the Paris Climate Agreement
Even if the US is pulling out

As I walk the halls of COP24, I proudly wear my California
flag pin.I don’t agree with the climate
policies of our national government (an understatement!!) and the world is
moving much too slowly on this existential threat.But I’m happy to be among those from US state
and national governments that are “still in” and showing how to move forward with policies that take us towards climate solutions. As California Air Resources Board Chair Mary Nichols told those gathered here, when we’ve set ambitious clean energy and clean air goals we’ve met them faster cheaper and less painfully than expected.

So, why am I here?To
connect, to learn, to assist and hopefully to make a little contribution to the
efforts to slow climate change.

Thursday, December 6, 2018

Katowice, Poland – Scientists have spent the three years
since COP21 refining and reviewing data, observations and studies. And since COP21 in Paris, they’ve learned to
convey their findings in the clear language policymakers can understand, even
preparing a special report directed at policymakers (copy here).

This is the fourth COP I’ve attended.The sense of urgency the scientists are
conveying cannot be understated.They know
what’s happening, they’re scared, and the want policymakers to take steps now
to stop the worst effects of climate change.

Dr. Hoesung Lee heads the vast group of science advisors to
United Nations climate efforts.“Achieving net-zero emissions of greenhouse gases is necessary,” he told
those gathered at COP24. He also said
that we need to start this rapid reduction quickly. “Every bit of warming
matter.Every year matters.Every choice matters.”

Dr. Elena Manaenkova of the World Meteorological
Organization also advises the climate policymakers. She said the latest findings show that the
hottest four years on record are the past four years (including 2018). She also said that the current average global
warming of about 1 degree centigrade is not uniform throughout the world. The Arctic is warming at a rate of about five
times faster than the rest of the earth and many land areas are also warming
faster than the average.

Dr. Elena Manaenkova of the World Meteorlogical Association
(photo by Michael Paparian)

Those of us from California know first hand the impacts that
are already here.Our recent fires
destroyed lives, displaces thousands of people from their homes and caused
smoke-related health impacts throughout the state. Last month, my family wore uncomfortable
breathing masks for a time in order to safely go outdoors.

California is clearly not alone.Island nations face special concerns from
sea level rise.Other areas are facing
increased hurricane and storm risk.The
heat, drought, water supply and other impacts California faces are similar to
those faces by similar Mediterranean type climate zones.

There are five Mediterranean climate zones in the world,
including California/northern Baha, Central Peru, southern & southwest
Australia, South Africa Western Cape and the Mediterranean Basin area.

One of the COP24 workshops I attended focused on how to
adjust within these climate zones.

Laurel Hunt of the Los Angeles Regional Collaborative
described how her team is working with the policymakers in her region to
develop a sustainability plan to address the direct and indirect impacts of
climate change, including energy, transportation, public health, water and housing.Los Angeles is embarking on an unprecedented
public collaboration process to engage the citizenry in understanding and
developing solutions.

Tropical and other vector-borne diseases are on the increase
in Mediterranean climate regions.West
Nile Virus is on the increase in these areas.Dr. Orna Matzner, a science advisor to the government of Israel
described how a recent outbreak of Leptospirosis could be traced back to public
exposure in rivers and streams.Those
water bodies had an increase in stagnant areas caused by lower water flows and
drought conditions.

Dr. Olna Matzner, Israel Science Advisor
(photo by Michael Paparian)

Alon Zask of the Israel Ministry for Environmental
Protection described how a future water strategy should rely on a combination
of steps, including pollution prevention, wastewater treatment and
desalination. He said that “In Israel,
sewage is a water source.” He also said
that more than 50% of water used in Israel is now “manufactured” from
desalination facilities. “If we’re
talking about adaptation, this is adaptation.

Alon Zask of the Israel Ministry for Environmental Protection
(photo by Michael Paparian)

Geoffrey Danker of Sempra Utilities in California described
how they are now addressing both the transition to renewable energy and
adaptation of their infrastructure to current and future climate impacts.They are already protecting low-lying
facilities from sea level rise, addressing fire impacts, and taking other
steps.Together with other utilities,
they evaluate and learn lessons from every extreme weather or fire
disaster.“The really depressing thing
is that every time we get together to evaluate one disaster,” he said, another
new disaster that has come along in the meantime.

Geoffrey Danker of Sempra Utilities
(photo by Michael Paparian)

Dr. Jordan Harris of Adapt Chile said his country
has faced severe fires and droughts as have other similar Mediterranean
regions.He summed up the situation for
these regions, saying they have become a “climate laboratory” as more and more
climate events affect their country.

Tuesday, December 4, 2018

COP24, Katowice, Poland – This is my fourth COP. My first was COP21 in Paris where the
international agreements to address climate change finally formalized.People came away energized and feeling that
as countries submitted their plans for climate solutions, we’d truly be on a
right path to resolving the climate crisis.

By my third COP in Bonn, Germany last year, there was a wide
recognition that all the country commitments were not enough to avoid
catastrophic climate change, but there was hope that countries would start to
move more aggressively to curtail fossil fuel use and other greenhouse gas
contributors.

The scientists are telling us that we should limit earth
temperature increases to 1.5 degrees centigrade and that if it goes above 2
degrees, our troubles will escalate rapidly.Even if we limit our temperature increases, we’ll still see many
impacts, including sea level rise, more extreme weather events, drought and
health impacts.At higher levels, the habitability
of large areas of our planet will come into question.

The sense of urgency is clearly prevalent at COP24, but so
is a sense that many governments are saying the right things at these sessions,
then failing to make the changes necessary to curtail fossil fuels quickly
enough.

Most countries agree there is a problem and are increasing
renewable energy.But many countries
arethen continuing to use or even
expand the use of coal and other fossil fuels.Not enough governments are providing the needed climate leadership and
some such as the US national government are overtly backsliding in climate
commitments.

Sir David Attenborough, still strong in his environmental
voice at 92 years, told the gathered heads of governments and others, “Leaders of the world you must lead. If we don’t take
action the collapse of our civilizations and the extinction of much of the
natural world is on the horizon.”

Leading means more than talking, said Dr. Gale Tracy Christiane Rigobert, Saint Lucian Minister for Education, Innovation, Gender Relations and Sustainable Development at an event I attended today. We need to be sure these “events as ‘talkshops’ will end with COP24,” she said.

Michael Paparian with St. Lucia Minister Rigobert

Though Poland is hosting COP24, the government is among those that cling to archaic energy sources. New coal projects are still proposed, even though many workers in the coal industry are pushing for a faster transition to clean energy jobs.

To most observers, the issue of coal is clear and immediate. “We must phase out coal,” said Manuel Pulgar-Vidal, former President of COP20, Peru Environmental Minister and current leader of World Wildlife Fund’s global climate and energy practice. “There is no Plan B for coal.”

What should come out of this COP to get us on the right path?

Michael Paparian with Manuel Pulgar-Vidal

Mr. Pulgar-Vidal, along with many others, are saying that the
existing system of country promises isn’t enough and that there needs to be a
clearer set of rules for how countries evaluate their emissions and commit to
solutions. There is some hope that a
framework for these rules will emerge during COP24, to be finalized in time for
renewed country commitments and actions by 2020.

We’ll see in the next few days if an action path is agreed to by
the gathered governments (absent the commitment of the current US national
government, of course).

Arnold Schwarzenegger at COP24
(photo by Michael Paparian)

One individual offered himself as an action example.Former California Governer Arnold
Schwarzenegger said, “Nobody is better at action than I am because I make
action movies .. but this is the real world.”

Let’s hope that the real world and real leaders take the real
action steps we need.

Friday, December 9, 2016

Is 21 the Magic Climate Number?

August 14, 2017 update: Plaintiff Sophie Kivlehan and her grandfather James Hansen penned an excellent op-ed about the case in the Boston Globe ... a copy of "OK US Government -- See You In Court" is here.

21 is a number that's come up a lot in recent climate discussions.

It took world leaders 21 years to reach the agreement on climate change announced in Paris last year at COP21.

It took 21 young plaintiffs, all under 21 years old just a few months to get the green light to proceed with a lawsuit against the United States Government asserting that inaction on climate deprives them of life, liberty and "a climate system capable of sustaining human life."

The case could have interesting implications for the Donald Trump administration when the case goes to trial in 2017.

The youth, ages 9 to 20, are asking the courts to order the U.S. Government, among other things:

"to prepare and implement an enforceable national remedial plan to phase out fossil fuel emissions and draw down excess atmospheric CO2 so as to stabilize the climate system and protect the vital resources on which Plaintiffs now and in the future will depend." (First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, filed 9/10/15, copy here)

Plaintiffs and attorneys hold hold a press conference on the steps of the Federal Courthouse in Eugene.
Twenty-one youth plaintiffs are suing the federal government in an attempt to force
science based action on climate change change.
(Robin Loznak/ZUMAPRESS.com reprinted with permission)

Fossil fuel interests and the U.S. Government tried to get U.S. District Court Judge Ann Aiken to toss the lawsuit. But in a ruling in early November, Judge Aiken ruled the case can proceed, saying (on page 21!!):

Judge Aiken's ruling (copy here) also discusses the relation of the relief sought in the lawsuit to U.S. climate commitments:

“Although the United States has made international commitments regarding climate change, granting the relief requested here would be fully consistent with those commitments. There is no contradiction between promising other nations the United States will reduce CO2 emissions and a judicial order directing the United States to go beyond its international commitments to more aggressively reduce CO2 emissions.”

This federal case is one of many related legal actions brought by youth in several states and countries, all supported by Our Children’s Trust, seeking science-based action by governments to stabilize the climate system. The case also follows a similar case decided in the Netherlands in 2015. In the Dutch case, the courts ruled on behalf of youth that the government must more quickly reduce fossil fuel emissions (see Guardian story here).

News of the action in the Our Children's Trust case came to delegates at the COP22 event in Marrakech, Morocco just as they were learning that Donald Trump had won the U.S. election. The possibility of U.S. courts stepping in on behalf of future generations was well received by those worried about the direction the U.S. might take under the new administration.

"Judge Aiken recognized the inherent sovereign duty of the U.S. government to protect the fundamental rights of young people and future generations to life, liberty, and a climate system capable of sustaining human life," said Elizabeth Brown, staff attorney for Our Children's Trust at a press conference during COP22 on November 11.

"These youth plaintiffs now have the opportunity to prove in court that the U.S. has knowingly put them and their generation in grave danger, trading their futures for the short-term profits for a few, in violation of their constitutional and public trust rights," said attorney Borwn. "Plaintiffs will ask this court to order the federal defendants to put the United States on a science-based path to climate stabilization."

"We as young people have a right to life on this planet," said Daniel Jubelirer, a youth organizer and activist working with plaintiff organization Earth Guardians. This case going to trial proves that our futures matter .. we'll see President Elect Trump in court."

"It's clear Judge Aiken gets what's at stake for us," said 17-year-old plaintiff Victoria Barrett, from White Plains, New York. "Our planet and our generation don't have time to waste. We are moving to trial and I'm looking forward to having the world see the incredible power my generation holds."

At the Marrakech press conference, Columbia University Professor Jeffrey Sachs (recognized by Economist magazine as one of the three most influential living economists) discussed the importance of this precedent-setting lawsuit to resolving climate issues and protecting future generations. "The judiciary," he said, "is the final place where citizens have their redress for rights denied."

Assisting with the court case is climate scientist Dr. James Hansen, who brought the climate crisis to the attention of the U.S. Congress in the 1980s and has been advising world leaders ever since. His 30 page declaration for the plaintiffs is also an excellent primer on the climate issue (copy here). Hansen's granddaughter, Sofie Kivlehan, is one of the plaintiffs. According to Dr. Hansen,

"Simply put: Our government’s persistent permitting and underwriting of fossil fuel projects serves now to further disrupt the favorable climate system that to date enabled human civilization to develop. In order to preserve a viable climate system, our use of fossil fuels must be phased out as rapidly as is feasible. ... Our government’s permitting of additional, new, or renewed fossil fuel projects is entirely antithetical to its fundamental responsibility to our children and their posterity. Their fundamental rights now hang in the balance." Declaration of Dr. James E. Hansen, page 31.

Climate Scientist Dr. Jame E. Hansen at COP21 in Paris
Grandfather of one of the plaintiffs
(photo by Michael Paparian)

In late November, the court said they expect the case to go to trial in the summer or fall of 2017, even though the defendants argued that it could take five years to go through procedural matters and discovery. Attorneys for the youth said they want to proceed. “We will push quickly to trial. The urgency of the climate emergency demands it,” said Julia Olson, counsel for Plaintiffs.

If these 21 youth are successful at trial, their case will contribute to needed and rapid solutions to the climate crisis, making the 21st and future centuries more livable century than they would otherwise be. 21 may indeed be an interesting climate number.

Photos of the youth plaintiffs and statements from each can be found here. This case is also starting to get attention in national media, including a Washington Post story here and New Yorker story here.

Friday, October 7, 2016

Electric cars, buses, trucks and trains. They're coming faster than you may think. Transportation electrification is one of the keys to meeting California, U.S. and international climate goals,

Without plug-in transportation, we won't meet targets of a 40% reduction in fossil fuel use by 2030 and 80% by 2050. All of those plug-in vehicle will need infrastructure on the other end of the plug ranging from charging stations to storage to renewable energy power generating facilities.

California continues to show leadership in providing incentives for all aspects electric vehicle (EV) deployment from vehicle manufacturing and ownership (see, for example, CalGreenFinance post on manufacturing incentives here) to charging infrastructure. The state is now looking further into how to assure there will be adequate infrastructure for the increasing number of electric vehicles. This is part of a larger strategy to address greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector (see prior Climate Dispatch post on California transportation strategies here).

The California EV market is the largest in the nation. The California Plug-In Vehicle Collaborative recently released the latest sales data for California and the nation, showing there are now over 500,000 plug-in electric vehicles nationwide, with nearly half in California:

California expects the number of plug-in vehicles to reach one million by 2020 and 1.5 million by 2025. California utilities are preparing for this surge of electric vehicles, including how to provide enough electricity at the right times of day and deciding what role they should play in delivering that electricity to cars.

To give a sense of the magnitude of the electric vehicle deployment, estimates in the Sacramento Municipal Utility District area suggest that we will need to move from 4300 plug in vehicles on the road today in the area to 240,000 by 2030. SMUD serves 1.4 million residents. Similar electric vehicle increases are expected throughout the state.

The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power estimates that 145,000 plug in electric vehicles will be needed in their area in five years and 580,000 by 2030 to meet climate goals.

The California Energy Commission recently held a workshop to explore how electric utilities are responding to the challenges. As background, they provided a good listing of the various laws, Executive Orders, incentive programs and regulations affecting electric vehicles within their workshop notice (here), including:

Governor Brown established the zero emission vehicle (ZEV) Executive Order directing California government to ensure electric charging infrastructure is available to support one million ZEVs by 2020 and 1.5 million by 2025

CARB’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard requires a 10 percent carbon intensity reduction in gasoline and diesel fuel sold in California by 2020 and electric transportation is one option to displace petroleum fuels and help fulfill that objective.

CARB also provides incentive rebates and vouchers in conjunction with federal tax credits to reduce the purchase price of ZEVs and the Energy Commission complements these efforts with its support through its own program to plan and deploy electric vehicle charging infrastructure 3 throughout California as part of the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program (ARFVTP).

SB350 of 2015 requires utilities, in conjunction with the requirements/processes of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and Energy Commission, to plan for electric vehicle deployment and infrastructure.

Investor Owned Utilities: Pilots & Programs

The investor-owned utilities (i.e. those regulated by the Public Utilities Commission) are evaluating how to assist electric vehicle infrastructure and electric vehicle deployment. The utilities are seen as a major source of know-how and capital to improve the infrastructure, but there are concerns from those who worry about the utilities competing with others who want to deploy electric vehicle chargers.

The investor-owned utilities have been told to present transportation electrification plans by January, 2017 (larger utilities: PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) or July 2017 (smaller utilities: Liberty Utilities, Bear Valley Electric, PacifiCorp). According to PUC Analyst Amy Mesrobian, it is possible for utilities to collaborate with each other on joint projects or to even work with nearby publicly owned utilities. The utilities regulated by the PUC will also be able to fast-track approval of smaller (less than $4 million) non-controversial projects.

More information on the PUC and investor owned utility programs can be found here.

Publicly Owned Utilities: New Planning Mandates & Challenges

The publicly owned utilities in California are grappling with how to develop infrastructure in their communities. The 16 largest public utilities, including SMUD, LADWP and others (see chart below) are required under SB350 to develop specific "Integrated Resource Plans" addressing renewable energy, greenhouse gas reduction and transportation electrification issues by 2019.

The Energy Commission workshop included presentations from several of the publicly owned utilities and other experts.

Some common themes, included:

There are not enough charging locations in place or planned to meet anticipated growth. In The electric grid is getting cleaner as more renewable projects come online. As a result the benefits of electric cars are increasing.

Customer choice is helping to propel more interest in electric vehicles. 43 new models are expected in the next four years.

Increased range is also helping drive interest. Upcoming models will get more than 200 miles and that may soon become the expected range.

Solar electric generation has caused an oversupply of energy mid-day in California. There may be ways to use the electric fleet as part of the solution to store electricity or charge during times of abundance. Fuel-cell vehicles could also be part of the solution if hydrogen is produced with excess power.

Time of use rates are an effective way to match electric production peaks with consumer demand. Electric vehicle charging at the right time can help significantly.

Providing charging in multi-family and rental housing is challenging and must be addressed in order to meet the electric vehicle targets.

The fast-charger network must continue to expand to keep up with electric vehicle fleet expansion. The demand for use of existing fast chargers is very high.

Fast chargers will be be even faster in the future as new ones are able to deliver increasing amounts of electricity.

Faster fast chargers may cost more and have a greater impact on electric loads. It is possible that there may be variable pricing among chargers depending on their throughput. This is likened to paying more for premium (faster EV charging) vs. regular (slower EV charging)

Consumer incentives, including incentives for chargers, are important to EV adoption

There is not yet a good business case for chargers. They generally cost more to install/maintain than the revenue they generate.

Building code changes to require chargers in new construction or renovations can be helpful.

Copies of presentations from the workshop are online here and some highlights are included below.

Los Angeles Seeks to Meet Challenge

The City of Los Angeles is implementing plans for scaling up electric vehicle infrastructure. They hope to go from about 23,000 plug-in electric vehicles today to 145,000 within 5 years and 580,000 by 2030. To do this, new car sales in the region will need to be about 15% plug-in by 2020.

Marvin Moon of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
Describes electric vehicle programs 10/5/2016

The Los Angeles City Council is engaged in pushing for better electric vehicle infrastructure. They are changing codes to require electric vehicle chargers in new construction. City fleets, including the police department, will increase their plug-in fleets to 1,600 vehicles. The city plans to install over 3,000 chargers and encourage at least 10,000 or more public charging stations in the next five years. The city chargers will include 1,000 curbside chargers.

The Los Angeles Police Department is purchasing many electric vehicles

More on Los Angeles electric vehicle plans in their presentation here.

Sacramento Pushing Fast Chargers

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) has several programs to encourage electric vehicle use and plans to expand these in 2017.

SMUD is deploying six DC fast chargers in the community, including chargers at the Sacramento Airport, the Sacramento Valley Train Station, Nugget Market in Elk Grove and elsewhere. They have a "charge free for a year" program to provide a rebate on electricity costs for electric vehicle users. They are expanding efforts to deploy chargers in multi-family dwellings and low income communities.

For 2017, SMUD is planning to expand their initiatives, including doubling their residential incentive from $300 to $600, providing incentives for multi-family and workplace charging and expanding the DC fast charger network.

Nissan: Charging, Charging, Charging

Nissan representative John Tillman emphasized the need for expanding charging infrastructure. He pointed out that California has slightly more than 10,000 level-2 public charging locations, but could use 100,000 or more to meet the rapid pace of electric vehicle adoption.

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

(April 10, 2016 update: A summary of the EcoBlocks proposal with contacts has been posted here. On March 25, the California Energy Commission announced plans to fund $1.5 million of the project costs, contingent on approval by the full Commission.)

Achieving much greater energy efficiency in existing buildings is one of the keys to the California 2030 goal of an overall reduction of 40% in greenhouse gas emissions. (See Climate Dispatch post: California 2030 Climate Goals: Energy Efficiency)

California is now working on measures to reach roughly a 17% reduction in existing building energy use. This is double the expected energy savings of just a few months ago. Since many buildings already have efficiency measures and many building owners will not want to retrofit their structures, the savings from buildings that are retrofitted will have to noticeable exceed 17% in order for the state to reach an overall 17% reduction

Getting existing building owners to adopt efficiency measures has been a major challenge. As the California Energy Commission pointed out in their recent Existing Buildings Energy Efficiency Action Plan, "Breaking through background noise to achieve actual
engagement and resulting action is difficult." (p. 84)

One concern raised by the Energy Commission is that building owners are faced with many overlapping messages and the resulting confusion may result in inaction.

A team from U.C. Berkeley and Stanford is working on a novel approach to induce homeowners to install a range of climate-friendly energy, water and transportation retrofits. Rather than look at retrofits on a single home, they are concentrating on an entire square block of homes. By retrofitting many adjacent homes at once, a number of measures that aren't practical for a single home suddenly make sense for the collection of homes. And, all homeowners on the square block should see savings in utility bills.

The innovative "EcoBlock" project was described by Energy and Resources Group Chair Harrison Fraker at the recent Philomathia Forum in Berkeley.. According to Professor Fraker, as much as 45% of California homes are in in old-style cities and suburbs filled with square (or rectangular) blocks. If we’re going to reach emissions mandates, says Fraker, “we really have
to figure out how to decarbonize existing housing stock .. the existing
building stock is a major generator of carbon emissions.”

U C Berkeley Energy and Resources Group Chiar Harrison Fraker

Professor Fraker and his colleagues have proposed an EcoBlock pilot project in Oakland to decarbonize a group of 28 homes and a few businesses. They are hopeful the project will receive initial funding in the next few months. If successful, the project could be replicated on blocks throughout the state and country.

The goals are impressive. The EcoBlock pilot project will:

use net zero energy

be greenhouse gas neutral or better

have very low water usage

promote electric vehicle usage

incorporate energy storage

be rapidly deployable

This will be accomplished through a series of inter-related systems. Solar panels will be the basic energy source, backed up by a storage in batteries, flywheels and shared electric cars. The batteries, including car batteries, will help manage the electric load of the dwellings. The homes will be retrofitted to achieve "deep energy" savings through lighting, window replacements and appliances. All gas-fired appliances will be replaced with super efficient electric units.

Part of the team is a group from Sanford working on the water system. Rainwater and greywater will be captured for reuse. Wastewater will be treated and used for irrigation of trees and gardens.

Professor Fraker says they will be able to reduce total home energy use from 690 megawatt hours per year to 280 megawatt hours with the energy retrofits. The solar is expected to produce 350 megawatt hours, with the net surplus powering the vehicle batteries. The utility and transportation savings from will be used, in part, to cover the cost of many of the efficiency improvements.

If successful, the EcoBlock could either be disruptive to the current utility structure, or could give utilities a new mission. Creative entrepreneurs could retrofit large areas of California while minimizing or eliminating the need for traditional utility customer relationships. Alternatively, the installation and maintenance of EcoBlocks could be a new business paradigm for utilities as they evolve into energy and environmental servicers.

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

I was pleasantly surprised by the youth presence at COP21. There is a new generation eager and ready to address the climate problem.

A substantial portion of the 10,000 non-governmental accredited "observers" at the event were born after the international community took notice of the climate problem in the late 1980s. At COP21, they weren't just observing. They were engaged, energetic, articulate and effective.

Youth gathering for updates, strategizing at COP21

More Than Observers

Timothy Damon of SustainUS made the point that was echoed by many youth. They will be living in the world impacted by climate change and they want their voice to be heard.

Hearing the Voice of Youth

The voice of youth was heard in many ways. Some button-holed diplomats, some had a presence with the media, some demonstrated and some were actually embedded within country delegations.

Yann Lesestre and Leslie Tourneville of French youth group CliMates display the message of zero carbon by 2050

Scientifically Necessary and Morally Just

Dyanna Jaye of SustainUS summed up the passion and effectiveness of youth, saying they move beyond what is perceived as possible to what is "scientifically necessary and morally just::

We Can Change the World

With over 190 countries and 20,000 government delegates, effectiveness of outside constituencies was hard to measure at COP21. But the successful outcome reflected the hard work of many. Jessica Olson of the Sierra Student Coalition recognized that change is possible through collaborative action.

The Road Doesn't End in Paris

Finally, Caroline Engle of the Sierra Student Coalition echoed the sentiment of many .. that COP21 is just the beginning. Much more work lies ahead if we are going to decarbonize our future. The youth at COP21 are ready to rise to the challenge.

Search This Blog

Translate

Follow by Email

About Me

Michael Paparian has over 35 years experience working on environmental finance and environmental policy issues. He has held a variety of positions inside and outside state government, including Deputy State Treasurer, Executive Director of the California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Special Consultant to the California Environmental Protection Agency, Board Member of the Integrated Waste Management Board and Sierra Club California State Director.