Friday, August 24, 2012

The Fluked Up Narrative of BC

Why Now and Democrats Are WrongOn Abortion (Genocide)

From Democrats and NOWs perspective one could surmise that a
woman's brain is in her vagina and not her head. Give me a break ! I am a woman and there is far more to me than
my vagina. My vagina does not make my decisions, my vagina does not run my life.

Here is a question, if a woman cannot be responsible for her own body enough to avoid unprotected sex what can she be responsible for? There should be no sacrifice of an innocent
child because the 'host woman' was too irresponsible of being certain she was in charge of her own reproductive abilities. Moral relativism allows the genocide of humans and blames the result of a casual sexual Liasion instead of the male and female who engaged in unprotected sex. You don't have to be a prude to avoid
pregnancy. You just need to be responsible in preventing an unwanted outcome before that moment of passion.

Casual everything, no taboos, moral relativism says, "Hey, baby no consequences!" Democrats and NOW say women are the victims when they get pregnant after an unprotected casual encounter. Democrats and NOW say it is not your fault you forgot to take contraceptives you are a victim. Democrats and NOW say you are not responsible for your body because of your feelings,you should not be punished for passion, or held accountable for the repercussions of your choice to engage in unprotected sex. Democrats and NOW view you are incapable of being responsible for your baby factory. Democrats say we want your vote, we understand your are the victim of your choice to have unprotected sex. Democrats award irresponsible sexually casual encounters, and justify their moral relativism with their agenda. Democrats NOW and their cottage industry of abortion declare you a victim. What a complete crock of nonsense.

Democrats and NOW would have you believe that all women are airheads, incapable of being responsible enough to ensure they practice safe sex and somehow are completely unable to be in charge of their own reproductive body functions. HOGWASH It is obvious that Democrats and NOW see women as childish playthings incapable of knowing when to say no, or to say no when a woman knows she has no way of preventing pregnancy when that moment of passion overcomes her. Translation: Democrats and NOW promote
the idea that all women are airheads and sluts. No protection, not your fault,
have an abortion!

I am offended that Democrats and President Obama picked an attractive activist with an appearance of a conservatively dressed woman who is in fact a strident Democratic operative, Sandra Fluke. Ms. Fluke whined in her testimony before Congress about a woman's right to chose both abortion and birth control. Birth control is not an irrational choice. Asking taxpayers to fund what they can not abide in principle is wrong and an irrational demand. That demand fully discounts and excuses personal responsibility. Fluke did not disclose she had been the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice. Nor did she name the strawgirl (her friend) nor the fact the strawgirl was gay, nor why this woman needed birth control. Even if the strawgirl had a medical condition requiring birth control why should a tax payer foot the bill? These are a few easy observations with questions begging to be asked. Pelosi and the Obama team rolled out an attractive
conservatively dressed activist, who did not disclose that she is a Democratic operative with an agenda, who complained about the rights of a gay woman needing birth control. I
don't care what someones sexual preferences are, but let me say it is highly unlikely that a gay woman is going to become pregnant without use of sperm from a male contributor. Nor should my tax dollars subsidize her use of them even if it is for medicinal reasons. I do find it questionable the Fluke
argument that a lesbian should need BC and that taxpayers should pay for this 'need.' Really what are the chances of Fluke's 'friend' getting
pregnant without real intent? This is more of the 'it takes a village nonsense' of moral relativism that removes any parameters for personal responsibility.

With the morning after pill there is NO reason for elective Abortion based on a woman's choice to engage in unprotected sexual engagement. NOT ONE. Morning after pills are available in every state on demand with no prescription necessary. Planned Parenthood also sees to it that a woman can get the morning after pill. From the age of 17 morning after pills are available. We are in the 21st Century. To Pretend that a woman has no options other than an abortion is outrageous. Any male engaging in sex with a woman under 16 should be held accountable for statutory rape. If your daughter is in engaged in sex at this age you have serious parenting issues.

Democrats and misogynists (who also wish to escape responsibility for their 'little swimmers') support the false narrative that a woman should participate in the GENOCIDE of Abortion when nothing is stopping her from going to the Drug Store the very next day in a free market in which she pays with her own funds to purchase a morning after pill without a prescription. (I am aware there are those who argue that a child begins with the act of conception). Don't tell me that a woman DOES NOT know that the sex she is having is unprotected.

If a 21st Century woman cannot drag her lazy butt to the drug store after a night of unprotected sex she deserves the consequences of her actions. (I am not talking about women who have been raped or the victims of incest here.)

As a proponent of Women's Rights I
am opposed to abortion. If a woman is raped she should not be ravaged by our side if her choice is an abortion. If a young woman is victimized by incest she likewise should not be victimized by our side. Both were already victims of misogyny and a crime.

Anyone’s suggestion that a woman who engaged in unprotected sex in the 21st century be captive to the industry
of abortion is an outrage. Democrats and NOW use this activity as a fertile garden of victimization, once again excusing a lack of personal responsibility.

Women who are victims of rape and girls who are victims of incest deserve every avenue of choice available to them, and all the psychological help necessary to make them as whole as possible. The stance of the left would suggest that every unwanted pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, and that the mother’s life is in jeopardy and this is statistically not true.

I say balderdash to that argument. Most women seeking an abortion have engaged in casual sex and have failed to be personally responsible in protecting themselves from becoming pregnant.

The very idea that any 21st century woman would be engaged in unprotected sex is an
outrage.

The Democrats and NOWs policy position on abortion supports a system of population control and that perverse position holds women hostage to a decision that will forever haunt her life.

I have yet to meet a single woman who got pregnant as a result of unprotected
sex who experienced a happy outcome, or who was unaffected by her choices. If there are
any they are few.

A more rational approach would be to insure that all women are well educated
with all of the options available to them to avoid pregnancy.

The first principle should be starting with young women learning how to set boundaries
and treating their bodies and their young minds as special.

Take a look around you. Do you think it is a healthy role model to have six and
seven year olds acting flirtatiously? Do you believe that young girls behaving
suggestively in scantily clad outfits encouraged by advertisers to behave in provocative
manner is a sign of a healthy society?

No wonder so many young women have sex and love all tangled up in their psyches.

The left is hard pushed to provide examples of women who did not suffer from
unprotected sex when she (the woman) either opted to keep the child, married
someone who she did not love that did not love her, and how that impacted their
lives, and the life of the child. It is not uncommon for these marriages to be the
marriages filled with alcoholism and spousal abuse.

Or when she (the woman) gave the child up for adoption, only later in life to
be overwhelmed with guilt not to mention the abandonment issues that her child
will eventually experience.

Or that she might truly have been to a butcher claiming to be an abortion clinic
and is left sterile for the rest of her life.

This is not the dark ages.

This is all out assault from the the unethical brain trust of moral relativism and the efforts of the left to undermine the importance of the family
unit. Where else to start….but with a woman by victimizing her choice of unprotected sex and blaming the outcome for her choice. Facilitated by a curriculum that undermines the psychological model of sexually healthy behavorial maturity over inappropriate sex as a minor. It completely undermines the magnificent gift and responsibility of motherhood and
childbearing, and its foundation as the fabric of society. Listen to the argument Obama made as State Senator in Illinois about late term partial birth abortion and his debasement of human life

You, me, everyone of us is a former fetus. I ask you what gives anyone more
right to the life you have than that of an aborted child? When did your life
become more valuable? I would further say that you clearly do not understand the
lefts complete investment in the management of life from inception to death.

Democrats and NOW must not know much about Margaret Sanger and her politics either.

I am adamantly pro life.

When was the last time you looked at a sonogram...sorry
buddy that is a living breathing (through the exchange of oxygen to is tissue)
human child. Married couples thrilled with the sonogram picture or video proudly share this with their families. Panned Parenthood providers insist this picture/video is no different than a virus, some amoeba or undefinable goo in a petri dish.

And I ask again, when did your or my life or that of any
other former fetus become more important that the one still in the womb? Fetuses are now routinely viable at 20 weeks a result of advances of neo natal care and ICU centers and some even sooner.

To engage in a dialogue dismissing this reality or view this in any other fashion is barbaric.

It is past time to leave this argument to the moral relativist of the left. This is a woman's issue. Nancy Pelosi and her young protoge Sandra Fluke, Debbie Wasserman Shulz and every Democrat is seizing this topic once again as an agenda item for at the Democratic National Convention in a matter of weeks to gain

votes in the coming election

It is well past time for women on the Right to claim and own the narrative on Abortion. We are not our vaginas, our lives are not ruled by our vaginas. We take responsibility for our reproductive rights and abilities. To support the Democrats and NOWs view of abortion one must accept that modern woman does not have ownership of her body, her sexual behavior or her choices.

Democrats think women are nothing but active sex toys and incapable of responsibility or acting like an adult. This is because democrats shy from any personal responsibility because it is in their electoral interest to promote the victimization of the choice of unprotected sex and "VICTIMS ARE VOTERS"

4 comments:

Excellent commentary. The morning after pill should be embraced by all. It makes it impossible for the egg to be implanted in the womb. We have 2 extremes in this country. One extreme is to allow abortion for any reason at any time. The other is rigidly opposed to abortion for any reason and believes that even the morning after pill is abortion. Scientifically, it is not. There are also those whose beliefs fall between the two extremes. Perhaps if that rigid mindset that believes the morning after pill is abortion would bend to embracing its use, the other extreme could be brought to their senses as well and understand that a fetus does feel pain at about 20 weeks. The morning after pill needs to be easily available at little or no cost and women have to be educated about its use. The morning after pill should have revolutionized and changed the entire abortion issue in this country. Instead, the two sides are as polarized as ever. It's a shame that new technology is available and yet little is being done to use it as a way to solve an issue that has divided this nation for a very long time.

Using abortion as a form of birth control proves women have become lazy. They have a lack of self control. Society has made it easy by supporting the platform "women's choice". Most women who go to abortion clinics probably never tell the man involved that he has fathered a child. Many Democrats will shout from the rooftops they are "Pro-Choice" only to say in the shadows, "I don't want to pay taxes to support those kids". I look at morality from a Biblical standpoint, and our culture is deteriorating...

It is a sad world where our daughters grow up thinking it is ok to risk their lives by having unprotected sex and perhaps contracting a disease but not only that, that if they do get pregnant, the life growing in them means nothing and they can just kill it, so that their irresponsible lives not be ruined and they can continue to make irresponsible decision after decision. What is more sad is that those that stand as PRO life are deemed the enemies. Don't you DARE stand up for unborn lives that cannot speak for themselves! Or teach oir children responsibility!