Meet The New Boss, Same As The Old
BossWill
Democrats repeal and impeach or salute and follow?
Mobbed-up establishment sycophant Nancy Pelosi is nobody's savior,
as sacrificial lamb Rumsfeld steps down

Supporter of Endless U.S. Occupation in Iraq

Supporter of Brutal Israeli Occupation of Palestine

The embarrassing debacle of our sell-out
political leaders and 2008 presidential hopefuls falling over themselves and
elbowing each other to the podium of the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee meeting held in Washington, DC between March 11th and 13th
demonstrated clearly that our leaders put Israel first and America last.
Fittingly, the hate conference was launched on Sunday, the Christian Sabbath.

AIPAC has been exposed. Its role in
putting America and its military needlessly in harm's way in Iraq, and now their
smashing success in terrifying Nancy Pelosi into removing any and all
restrictions formerly placed on the criminal Bush regime, ensures that an attack
on Iran is imminent and no longer avoidable. Bush is a mass murdering criminal
maniac, and also totally anti-American. His imprisoning two Border Patrol
officers for doing their duty in protecting America and trying to keep a
dangerous drug smuggler from delivering huge quantities of narcotics into this
country from Mexico, not only confirms Bush's contempt and hatred for US, but
our rules and laws as well. And considering Bush's love for Mexico and his
addiction to criminal intrigue, it wouldn't surprise me in the least if Bush is
part and parcel of the illegal drug traffic operation originating in Mexico.

And as the Bush regime abolishes our
borders in the Southwest, his airport Gestapo keep wanding and x-raying US,
purportedly to keep US safe from our enemies. If we no longer have a safe border
in the southern part of our country, why do we need the Department of Homeland
Security and its TSA? It's clear that Bush's geopolitical philosophy coincides
totally with that of the global one-world communist government philosophy so
crucial to the geopolitical objectives of the Zionist international bankers and
their New World Order.

Bush is perfect for the role of the
American "transitionor," a lawless tyrant postured to negate both our laws and
national purpose, and the one selected by the bankers to impose police state
tactics against US thereby converting Zionist mass media-imposed "political
correctness" into law. A perfect example of this legislative conversion and
initiative is the current drive in Congress for "hate crimes" legislation.
Partisan affiliation is, understandably, again a mere distraction to facilitate
the Zionist divide-and-conquer strategy to render resistance to thought crimes
legislation totally ineffectual.

That AIPAC totally controls American
foreign policy in the Middle East is now completely unchallengeable considering
the disgusting humbling of American political notables at AIPAC's 2007 Policy
Conference. Vice President Dick Cheney chose the AIPAC conference as the
legitimate venue to lambaste and attack the United States Congress for their
"disloyalty" to America and its military by showing signs of balking as regards
the continued funding for our illegal, unjust, unconstitutional and unnecessary
invasion of Iraq that has cost our military so dearly, and which continues to
dangerously threaten the stability of our economy.

And any and all attempts to terminate
the slaughter of innocent Iraqi citizens, and/or any attempt to stop the AIPAC-ordered
invasion of Iran, will invoke the smear of "anti-Semitism." But if trying to
deal justly and honorably with Jews, Muslims and Arabs in the Middle East is
marginalized with the epitaph of "anti-Semitism," can we then assume that
torture, the mass murders of defenseless women and schoolchildren in Palestine,
the torture of defenseless prisoners, and the violations of the Geneva
Conventions and United Nations' Resolutions are pro-Semitic and therefore
pro-Jewish? Are the world's greatest atrocities now attributable to all Jews?

Wasn't that the gross and inappropriate
generalization that brought down Henry Ford's arguments in 1921 in his
now-Fahrenheit 451-banned book, "The International Jew?" Isn't this what also
negated Adolf Hitler's complaints against the "Jewish bankers" in his "Mein
Kampf" of 1926? Isn't this the kind of generalization that both Christian and
Jewish Zionists have always hidden behind, that of smearing anyone who disagrees
with the horrors and terrorism of Zionism as simply being anti-Jewish? Isn't
this the trap that Charles Lindbergh and Mel Gibson fell into? Isn't that why
these truth tellers are always stopped even before they can initiate an
intelligent debate on this extremely vital subject?

Every responsible American patriot, even
those who take extra precautions separating Zionists from Jews, is smeared all
the same by the evildoers. The so-called "Reverend" John Hagee addressed the
AIPAC hate cabal reversing once again the roles of those actually being
discriminated against, and persecuted, and tortured, and mass murdered in their
own land, and identified as victims of Zionist horror. It is they, the victims,
who are now being called the real threat as was the objective of the role
reversal propaganda of Hitler's Nazis in 1938 Germany. But it is Hagee, and
AIPAC, and Israel, and Bush, and Cheney who are the 2007 carbon copies of 1938
Nazi Germany! The world fears and hates US and Israel.

The alternate media, America's real free
and independent press and voice of the people, has now once and for all exposed
AIPAC for what it is: America's one and only political party. AIPAC is the
astonishingly rich and powerful party/lobby that controls ALL politicians in
America. Even a now-retired former president, Jimmy Carter, winner of the Nobel
Peace Prize, cannot stand up to the unlimited American political power of AIPAC.
Congressional representatives Paul Findlay and Cynthia McKinney can testify to
the all encompassing power and terror of AIPAC.

After Speaker Nancy Pelosi pointed out
in her address at the AIPAC 2007 Policy Conference that the war in Iraq had
"failed on all three accounts," specifically that it failed to make US safer,
failed to make our military stronger, and failed to make the Middle East more
stable, her honest and truthful observations were received by the "America last"
traitors and agents of a foreign power with boos and hisses and a mild "polite"
applause. Who the hell are these traitors and enemies of America to criticize
our leaders and representatives for correctly assessing our losses in the insane
and unjust invasion they helped initiate? And why do our representatives and
leaders fawn over them in hopes of winning their favor? We all know the answer:
money!

George Soros is a world renowned
billionaire and financial wizard. Soros is Jewish. His concern for the wrong
direction that AIPAC is leading US in supports the concerns of Jewish professor
and intellectual Anthony Judt, as well as the analytical criticism of AIPAC
voiced in the now-famous Harvard paper prepared by Professors Stephen Walt and
John Mearsheimer. Writing in the New York Review of Books, Soros in his piece
published in the April 12th edition entitled, "On Israel, America and AIPAC"
offers: "The current policy is not even questioned in the United States. While
other problem areas of the Middle East are freely discussed, criticism of our
policies toward Israel is very muted indeed. The debate in Israel about Israeli
policy is much more open and vigorous than in the United States. This is all the
more remarkable because Palestine is the issue that more than any other
currently divides the United States fromEurope. Some European governments,
according to reports, would like to end the economic boycott of Hamas once a
unity government is successfully established. But the US has said it would not."

Soros continues: "One explanation is to
be found in the pervasive influence of the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC), which strongly affects both the Democratic and the Republican
parties. AIPAC's mission is to ensure American support for Israel but in recent
years it has overreached itself. It became closely allied with the neocons and
was an enthusiastic supporter of the invasion of Iraq. It actively lobbied for
the confirmation of John Bolton as USambassador to the United Nations. It
continues to oppose any dialogue with a Palestinian government that includes
Hamas. More recently, it was among the pressure groups that prevailed upon the
Democratic House leadership to drop the requirement that the President obtain
congressional approval before taking military action against Iran. AIPAC under
its current leadership has clearly exceeded its mission, and far from
guaranteeing Israel's existence, has endangered it."

The latter observation is right on the
money. It can be shown that the majority of the Jews who are native to the
nation-state of Israel are vehemently opposed to the right-wing fascist police
state tactics of the Likud Party-controlled ruthless government of Israel. It
can also be shown that the majority of Jews residing in the United States not
only oppose the Likudniks in Israel, but are also strongly opposed to George
Bush and his regime. AIPAC does not represent the majority of Jews in EITHER
country!

Soros observes: "Supporters of Israel
have good reason to question AIPAC's advocacy and they have begun to do so. But
instead of engaging in critical self-examination, AIPAC remains intransigent.
Recently, the pro-Israel lobby has gone on the offensive, accusing the so-called
progressive critics of Israel's policies of fomenting anti-Semitism and
endangering the very existence of the Jewish state."

Soros laments the attacks against him by
fellow Jews and doesn't hesitate to quote and itemize their charges against him.
It documents and reveals that which any alert observer has already surmised.
Soros reveals his feelings, both as a Jew, and as an American: "I am not
insensitive to this argument. It has held me back from criticizing Israeli
policies in the past. I am not a Zionist, nor am I am a practicing Jew, but I
have a great deal of sympathy for my fellow Jews and a deep concern for the
survival of Israel. I did not want to provide fodder to the enemies of Israel. I
rationalized my position by saying that if I wanted to voice critical views, I
ought to move to Israel. But since there were many Israelis who held such views
my voice was not needed, and I had many other battles to fight."

That succinctly articulates not only
Soros' views as a Jew, but the views of many Americans as well, including my
own. I am not pleased with the way the Jewish nation-state of Israel came into
being. I am not at all comfortable with the way the modern state of Israel came
into being, that being with acts of terrorism against the former peaceful
Palestinian inhabitants of what is now Israeli territory. I abhor the
ruthlessness and inhuman brutality of Israel, which is most definitely on a par
with that of Hitler and his Nazis. A peaceful coexistence is not only possible,
but was demonstrated as viable by former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin.
As Soros points out, AIPAC has so far overstepped its mission of protecting
Israel that its posture now threatens both Israel and theUnited States.

Soros summarizes his observations in his
outstanding and well-written piece: "I am not sufficiently engaged in Jewish
affairs to be involved in the reform of AIPAC; but I must speak out in favor of
the critical process that is at the heart of our open society. I believe that a
much-needed self-examination of American policy in the Middle East has started
in this country; but it can't make much headway as long as AIPAC retains
powerful influence in both the Democratic and Republican parties. Some leaders
of the Democratic Party have promised to bring about a change of direction but
they cannot deliver on that promise until they are able to resist the dictates
of AIPAC. Palestine is a place of critical importance where positive change is
still possible. Iraq is largely beyond our control; but if we succeeded in
settling the Palestinian problem we would be in a much better position to engage
in negotiations with Iran and extricate ourselves from Iraq. The need for a
peace settlement in Palestine is greater than ever. Both for the sake of Israel
and the United States, it is highly desirable that the Saudi peace initiative
should succeed; but AIPAC stands in the way. It continues to oppose dealing with
a Palestinian government that includes Hamas."

It is important to remember that Hamas
was assisted in its establishment by funding provided by the state of Israel.
Israel had hoped to create an Arab/Muslim opposition movement that would
challenge the authority of Yasser Arafat's Palestinian Liberation Organization.
The original Bush/Israel-sanctioned election supported a Hamas government, and
as Soros points out, requires Israel and the United States to deal with that
popular movement to at least bring the belligerents to the peace table. The
obvious answer to peace in the Middle East is to capitalize on a "bottoms up"
pressure of the people of both the Palestinian territories and Israel to
pressure governments and societal and political organizations for peace.

But the suicidal tendency of AIPAC,
representing the minority fascist governments of both Israel and the United
States, is blocking any and all such peace initiatives. Additionally, AIPAC's
pressure for US to attack Iran has been supported by the treasonous actions of
so-called Speaker of the House of Representatives, Madam Nancy Pelosi. If one
individual can be identified by her treasonous actions and as an anti-American
traitor, it is Pelosi. She alone will bear full responsibility for the coming
conflagration that will be launched by the criminal Bush regime's attacking
Iran.

And this invasion and attack will serve
neither Israel nor America. In fact, tiny Israel will now be at greater risk
than anytime during its entire existence. The resistance demonstrated by
Hezbollah when Israel launched an unjust attack against Lebanon's infrastructure
has already demonstrated this. Retaliation againstIsrael need not be nuclear nor
immediate; but it will be massive and total. AIPAC is America's greatest enemy,
and may eventually prove to be Israel's as well.

If George W. Bush launches a
pre-emptive war on Iran, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will bear full moral
responsibility for that war.

For it was Pelosi who quietly agreed
to strip out of the $100 billion funding bill for Iraq a provision that
would have required President Bush to seek congressional approval before
launching any new war on Iran.

Pelosi's capitulation came in the
Appropriations Committee.

What went down, and why?

"Conservative Democrats as well as
lawmakers concerned about the possible impact on Israel had argued for the
change in strategy," wrote ghe Associated Press' David Espo and Matthew
Lead.

"Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., said
in an interview there is a widespread fear in Israel about Iran, which ...
has expressed unremitting hostility to the Jewish state.

"'It would take away perhaps the
most important tool the U.S. has when it comes to Iran,' she said of the
now-abandoned provision.

"'I don't think it was a very wise
idea to take things off the table if you're trying to get people to modify
their behavior and normalize in a civilized way,' said Gary Ackerman of New
York."

According to John Nichols of The
Nation, Pelosi's decision to strip the provision barring Bush from attacking
Iran without Congress' approval "sends the worst possible signal to the
White House."

"The speaker has erred dangerously
and dramatically," writes Nichols. Her "disastrous misstep could haunt her
and the Congress for years to come."

Nichols does not exaggerate.

If Bush now launches war on Iran, he
can credibly say Congress and the Democrats gave him a green light. For
Pelosi, by removing a provision saying Bush does not have the authority, de
facto concedes he does have the authority.

Bush and Cheney need now not worry
about Congress.

They have been flashed the go sign
for war on Iran.

Pelosi & Co. thus aborted a
bipartisan effort to ensure that if we do go to war again, we do it the
constitutional way, and we do it together.

Nothing in the provision would have
prevented Bush, as commander in chief, from responding to an Iranian attack
or engaging in hot pursuit of an enemy found in Iraq. Nor would the
provision have prevented Bush from threatening Iran. It would simply have
required him to come to Congress ­ before launching all-out war.

Now Pelosi has, in effect, ceded
Bush carte blanche to take out Iran's nuclear facilities. It's all up to him
and Cheney.

For this the nation elected a
Democratic Congress?

Why did Pelosi capitulate? Answer:
She was "under pressure from some conservative members of her caucus, and
from lobbyists associated with neoconservative groups that want war with
Iran and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)," writes
Nichols.

The Washington Times agrees as to
who bully-ragged Nancy into scuttling any requirement that Bush come to the
Hill before unleashing the B-2s on Arak, Natanz and Bushehr:

"Last week, House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi received a smattering of boos when she bad-mouthed the war effort
during a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and the
Democratic leadership, responding to concerns from pro-Israel lawmakers, was
forced to strip from a military appropriations measure a provision meant to
weaken President Bush's ability to respond to threats from Iran."

This episode, wherein liberal
Democrats scuttled a bipartisan effort to require Bush to abide by the
Constitution before taking us into a third war in the Middle East, speaks
volumes about who has the whip hand on Capitol Hill when it comes to the
Middle East.

Pelosi gets booed by the Israeli
lobby, then runs back to the Hill and gives Bush a blank check for war on
Iran, because that is what the lobby demands. A real candidate for Profiles
in Courage.

As for the presidential candidates,
it is hard to find a single one willing to stand up and say: If Bush plans
to take us into another war in the Mideast, he must first come to Congress
for authorization. And if he goes to war without authorization, that will be
impeachable.

All retreat into the
"all-options-are-on-the-table" mantra, which is another way of saying, "It's
Bush's call."

The corruption of both parties is
astonishing. Republicans used to be the party of the Constitution: "No more
undeclared wars! No more presidential wars!"

Democrats used to be the party of
the people. The people don't want this war. They don't want another. The
Jewish community voted 88 percent for Democrats in November, and 77 percent
oppose Iraq.

So says Gallup. Yet, just because
the Israeli lobby jerked her chain, the leader of the Peoples' House has
decided she and her party will leave the next war up to Bush.

Sam Rayburn must be turning over in
his grave.

c. 2007 Creators Syndicate

Comment Mary Sparrowdancer

The one and only one way for anyone
in political office to remove themselves from AIPAC, or from any other
political pressure is to simply remember their oath of office to defend and
uphold the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution takes the
subject of war seriously, and calls for not just one voice when it comes to
a declaration of war. We need to rid ourselves of all of these persons who
are supposed to be representing The People of the US but are not doing so.
If those in the three branches of the government cannot uphold the
Constitution as they are sworn to do, then they should be removed from
office because they are a disgrace to America.

Members of the main
pro-Israel lobbying group offered scattered boos to a statement by House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that the Iraq war has been a failure on several scores.

The boos, mixed with
some polite applause, stood in stark contrast to the reception House Minority
Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) received minutes earlier. Most of the crowd of
5,000 to 6,000 stood and loudly applauded Boehner when he said the U.S. had no
choice but to win in Iraq.

Pelosi and Boehner
were speaking at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) annual
meeting. AIPAC has not taken a position on the war in Iraq or the supplemental
spending bill to be considered this week by the House Appropriations Committee,
but much of Boehner’s speech was about the future of the Iraq conflict.

Boehner sought to link
the fight in Iraq to the future of Israel, as he said a failure in Iraq would
pose a direct threat to Israel.

Pelosi said the U.S.
military campaign in Iraq had to be judged on three accounts: whether it makes
the U.S. safer, the U.S. military stronger and the region more stable.

“The war in Iraq fails
on all three counts,” Pelosi said. Some of the crowd applauded before catcalls
and boos could be heard. A spokesman for AIPAC argued the boos were in response
to those clapping for Pelosi.

AIPAC leaders have
said about 6,000 of their members are in town for this week’s annual meeting,
which ends today. Members are set to lobby individual lawmakers on the Hill for
the rest of today. A priority for the group is to convince Congress to approve
tougher sanctions on Iran, which is seen as a growing threat to Israel.

Open Letter To:
US House Of Representatives
Leader Nancy PelosiAnd The US
House
Of RepresentativesFrom Jim Kirwan

9-24-6

RE: Your recent comments on
Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez,

Because you are unreachable as my
US representative, I'm writing this open and illustrated letter to be
certain that you have the opportunity to read this for yourself. I'm just
one of your constituents, but there are millions just like me.

You said, "Hugo Chavez fancies
himself a modern-day Simon Bolivar, but all he is, is an everyday thug." And
you charged that Chavez "has abused the privilege of speaking at the United
Nations." You could learn a lot from this man, Nancy, because he actually
represents not only his people, but the vast majority of people in the
world. Part of the reason for the United Nations is to provide people from
other nations with a forum to do exactly what Chavez did-which was to simply
rebut the policies and practices of what has become the
military-dictatorship of the USA-Israeli cabal. You have only to note the
length of the applause that greeted Chavez's remarks to understand how far
from reality your own uninformed positions really are.

You are the supposed 'leader' of
the Democratic side of the US House of Representatives, which has to be one
of the most criminally-flawed and out-of-touch organizations in the world
today. For the last five years you and the vast majority of 'your members'
have consistently voted in favor of the junta that has taken over this
nation. You of course went along with the attack on Afghanistan, despite the
fact that no facts were presented to you or to the Congress, regarding the
'proofs necessary' to warrant such an attack. You voted for the USA Patriot
Act, without even reading it and then you voted for the illegal and
completely unfounded War-on-Iraq. You personally went ballistic over any
attempt to separate US support for Israel from continuing US policy ­ and
that's just the barest outline of your failures to represent the people of
your district in California, and California in the nation. If Chavez is "a
thug"-then what does that make you and the biggest-little
corrupted-corporate club in the United States?

You and your colleges are part of
the privileged class in this country, and as such should be disqualified
from "representing" anyone but the filthy rich ­ that's the job of the US
Senate. Together you are referred to as "the Congress" and your popularity
is well below that of the creature you created when you failed in your sworn
duty to prevent the US Supreme Court from appointing Bush back in 2000. That
election should have been handled by the Congress, but you and yours shirked
your duties (again) to the people you are supposed to represent-and sat
silently by while the United States was handed over to a certified
"political thug." Then in 2004 you had another chance in yet another rigged
election, and again you failed to stop a second stolen election: However 'we
the people' let you get away with it, so it appears that "we" are equally
culpable in this series of crimes against what used to be our country.

My point here is that before you or
representative Rangel, decide to spit on the president of another nation,
you might want to remember that the United States of America was founded
around the privilege of Freedom of Speech. One of the reasons that the UN
was built here was supposedly so that people would not fear to speak their
minds; because after all the place was located in the USA, where such things
were always possible-at least they were before Bush & the Bandits (that
includes most of the 535 members of the congress) transformed 'us' into the
world's most recently-corrupted Empire.

Bush deserved everything that
Chavez said about him. That's what the truth does Nancy, it stings whenever
it is spoken aloud. Bush may be the titular head of state but he's not 'my
president'-because in my country presidents' have to be elected legally,
they cannot be appointed by the courts. And as far as manners go, when a
corrupt leader attempts to own the entire world, then the potentially
affected world has every right to call him on it! Just as when Cheney-Bush
and his cabinet finally go down for this: the congress and the courts will
each have their share in that assessment as well, right along with major
media and their psy-ops propaganda coupled with the misinformation and the
crimes of omission that goaded so many into many of the illegal things this
nation continues to do.

Think of it this way Nancy-if the
USA were just a mega-corporation, you would all be members of the Board of
Directors, and the Courts would be serving as your legal advisors. The
foreign policies of this nation would be seen as the corporate business plan
for unending growth, and Homeland security would be seen as the privatized
hired guns that they are-to eventually become the prison guards in what is
about to become the National Security State that used to be called the
United States of America. But, if this were a corporation then you would all
have been fired, years ago, because not one single policy that you have all
underwritten has worked. Nothing, Nada, Zip!

Under your 'leadership' the titles
of all the agencies designed to protect the nation or its people have all
been turned on their heads EPA destroys the environment, Health and Human
Services destroys those who need help, rather than assisting them. Education
has become the corral that holds the sheep, for shipment to the lowest
possibilities while they await the export of what remains of all their jobs.
Look at Katrina, and see how you failed to hold Bush's feet to the fire on
that one ­ you ought to have to try to live without water or electricity
for a month ­ before you go to jail for allowing the government to

destroy five thousand perfectly
good homes, because they're on "valuable" land. New Orleans is in the USA
and yet the congress and you personally Mrs. Pelosi did nothing to assist
those refugees and the displacements which that storm crated over a year
ago. Just who is it that you do represent 'Leader' Pelosi?

The administration has gutted
international agreements, treaties, and conventions­ and as the congress-you
and yours have been right there holding your tongues and voting for
everything the dictator demands of you, without a whimper. If this had
happened in most counties, Bush and his cabinet would have been lynched in
the streets ­ but not here ­ no here we are AFRAID: very afraid of what
might happen to us-if we dare to speak out against the likes of you and
Cheney-Bush, or the courts-all of which comprise the despicable and illegal
government of the USA today! Just look at this latest little piece of
bullshit that congress is going to play word games with ­ the Geneva
Conventions: You held a dog-&-pony-show about how not to change the Charter,
or the touchy parts that directly affect the entire point of the agreement
itself. Then you announced a compromise that did exactly what you said it
would not do ­ but in the process you found yet another way to cave in to
the junta that calls itself the USA's world government. This will not 'fool'
anyone, especially not in the wider world

.

As a 'mega-corporation' in charge
of administering one of the world's most bountiful nations, you have instead
run this place from a national surplus into the most despicably bankrupt
country imaginable. You have allowed our interstate freeway system to be
divided up and sold off to foreign nations that are converting them to
privatized toll-roads, just like you're allowing the national parks to be
invaded by the oil companies, while you are not-demanding that the
automotive companies come up with a carburetor that could get at least 90
miles to the gallon. In every area of national interest you have opted for
the destruction of irreplaceable natural resources to maximize short term
corporate gains. You have defended Capitalism at the expense of the millions
of lives of those who have made those corporations possible-and you've
chosen to do it all under a filthy blanket of secret government activities
that was unthinkable before you and your fellow creeps took over. There is
virtually no chance that any of you on the Board of Directors will suddenly
awaken anytime soon. Meanwhile you have presided over the destruction of one
of the most lucrative and 'possibility-filled' nations on earth. And on your
watch you have been driving this entire nation into literal chaos at a
thousand miles an hour-and then you claim that this is the best that can be
done-given all the wars that you ensured could be created under Cheney-Bush
(including the two more with Iran and Syria still pending). What's truly
incredible is that you haven't all been lynched already!

Just as a point of interest what do
you say to all those who have lost people in your wars? How do you sleep at
night? Have you thought about what will happen when all that DU contaminated
brass from all our shells gets reprocessed into 'goodies' for the yuppies to
use in their 'new' homes that are being built to accommodate so many new
foreigners, who can come here and buy property with their money: while you
disallow Americans to travel with more than $10,000 in cash? You are
spreading death and continued destruction with every stroke of the pen you
make, with your so-called 'position' in this government.

You and Cheney-Bush have blood on
your hands; in fact you are all so drenched in the contaminated blood from
so many innocent people the world over, (from Palestine, to Bosnia, to
Afghanistan, and Iraq) that it would be difficult for even Solomon to figure
out how to deal with all your crimes against humanity: not to mention all
the secret money wasted or given to Cheney & his friends. And you dare to
criticize a man who has been a leader for all those things that you
specifically claim to represent 'us' in! Nature will find a way to deal with
you-and you will pay for what you've collectively tried to do to the world.
The arrogance of this government is so far beyond the pale, that when the
world begins to stand up, as it is doing now: Your bought and paid-for
co-conspirators (maybe a million strong) will be swept away like the
sand-castles they are trying to build-before that oncoming Hurricane of the
other Five Billion, Nine-Hundred Million of us that you tried to enslave. .
.

Nancy - When you first 'ran for
office' I was one of those that helped; guess I'm still a constituent. You
were just a woman with five kids and a bright smile that wanted to do
something to change the world. Well you've "done something" alright-and
because you have so completely abused your office and this nation's
people-it's way past time for you to go. However; because you are a person
completely without honor, I don't expect you to resign, but I will look
forward to adding the leadership of Congress, to the pending impeachment
proceedings, that will soon begin the process of taking back this nation!

You have chosen to overlook the
responsibilities that go with your office, and the obligations that go with your
title. The constitution gave the House of Representatives the sole power to
bring impeachment charges against any officer of the federal government-yet you
have chosen to deny the people of the United States the right to bring
impeachment charges against the highest officers of this government. You do not
have the right to come between the people and their government.

The constitution also gave the power
over the purse strings for the federal government to the congress; again-neither
you nor the congress had the right to "give away that right" to the
administrative branch of government; which you did when the congress (of which
you were a part), granted The Decider his License-to-Kill, immediately after
911. "What must now be done IMMEDIATELY, is that congress must tear up that
license and take back your powers to check the administration-which would bring
control back over the wars, to the congress and to the people of the United
States: which would put an end to the Dictatorship-of-the-Decider." This is the
only way to begin to end this nightmare that has cost us over 500 billion
dollars, and only god knows how many lives-so far!

You have said that you will not cut the
funding for the war because that would mean the congress would "not be
supporting the troops." That is a conceit meant to justify continuing with
business as usual-and for the record that's a lie! If congress supported the
troops they would remove The Decider and his failed cabinet for not only
non-performance, but for incompetence as well as the tyranny under which he led
this nation into both those wars in the first place. Nine-Eleven was a crime,
not an act of war, and everything that flowed from that almost immediate
decision by the Bandits has enabled virtually every crime that has come directly
from that first mega-lie. Virtually all these events have contributed to the
bankruptcy of the nation and the destabilization of the planet ­ and this comes
down to the failure of congress to check the colonial and dictatorial passions
of the Gang-in-Power now.

It was the job of congress to protect
this nation from internal enemies, as much as it was your responsibility to
protect Americans from foreign powers and you failed by refusing to
differentiate between the commission of a civil crime of greed and power from an
outright international act of war. No discussions took place, no debates were
held: The Decider told us what to think, and congress followed lock-step-in near
unanimity. Now you're the Speaker-and if you do not act to bring about
corrections for these crimes in which you participated-then there will be hell
to pay!

For your information you should also
re-review the record of exactly what has happened since 911. The election of
2000 was stolen, and between the inauguration and nine-eleven, The Decider had
already begun to re-write all the agreements and compacts which the US had been
a signatory to. This included everything from Global Warming to the Geneva
Conventions. After that black September day you granted the presidency an open
ended agreement for total and unlimited warfare, not on an enemy but upon an
idea!

How did he manage the wars or the
policies of the United States in the six years since he's been The Decider-in
effect the CEO in charge of everything that could be called part of "the
interests" of the United States? George W. Bush has failed repeatedly in each
and every aspect of every single thing he has undertaken-again & again-yet
congress has continued to go along and has yet to question anything that The
Decider has done. No hearings, no serious investigations were ever held:
Katrina, Abu Ghraib, the never-ending SECRECY, the paranoia, the spying by this
government that now includes White House claims of privacy over the visitor's
logs maintained by the Secret Service over those who visit the White House. The
White House is the People's House, and those documents belong to the people of
the United States-those records are not now and have never been the private
property of any of our government's servants. The White House is ours the
Decider is just a renter, passing through (1).

Look at what has happened to the world's
most-super power. The Decider and his advisors took the most expensive armed
force in history and systematically destroyed it. We lost a full third of our
mechanized vehicles in the full speed rush (through a massive desert sand-storm)
to topple Baghdad. And we continue to lose weaponry and vehicles to the
hopelessly inept military policies of people who have no knowledge of anything
military-because they each dodged their military responsibilities when their
time came. In fact the only thing the administration's personnel have in common
is that they all lie and attempt to avoid all responsibility for anything. The
other massive costs associated with the wars have been the massive frauds
created by Cheney and his companies in their bogus 'secret-no-bid contracts'
with the government for everything from the delivery of mail, to food service
and recreation. On the civilian side there was the re-construction of electrical
facilities, drinkable water, sanitation, hospitals, schools, or even general
security to allow protection of the conquered to leave their houses-none of
which happened-hell it's no wonder we cannot win in this situation. These things
didn't happened just here and there, it was policy that the contractor's
couldn't be forced to produce in combat situations, yet they were to be paid
anyhow. Had any of this been investigated at all-Cheney would in jail on charges
of corruption, theft, war-profiteering and a huge list of other crimes

While Cheney wasn't alone in this theft
of multi-billions, he is the highest ranking official who is visibly culpable,
and criminally liable. Yet no one has even suggested that he could be
questioned, much less charged with any crimes. And you say that impeachments are
out-of-the-question: or "off the table" as you put it? Explain that to the
American public!

One thing has become crystal clear from
all of these crimes of greed and arrogance: No one who has a million dollars
should be allowed to hold any government office in the United States of America.
Of course this won't be allowed to become law, because the same people who would
have to approve this are the same people who are the millionaires in question:
most of them members of congress! But -in Central and South America, that is
exactly the kind of grass-roots thing that has begun to take root. After a
hundred years of invasions and colonial rule, the people there figured it out:
the rich do NOT make good leaders because all they care about is more money and
more power-purchased at the expense of the public they were supposed to
represent against those foreign powers that routinely come to steal their
countries and their lives. The primary offender therein is and was the USA.

This "thought-form" may not be possible
at this time, but the idea will grow, and with it the time frame for leadership
by the filthy-rich will continue to shrink. It's way past time for you and your
fellow congressional people to get to work and begin to do what you were elected
to do-which is to rid this country, and the world, of the Dictatorship that now
owns everything we used to call our own!

One more thing Madame Speaker, please
spare us all the embarrassment of everything that has to do with political
parties because that is another failed fiction. Neither political party in the
US allows freedom of speech or public gatherings that disagree with what the
formal party gatherings want the world to see. There is no opposition coming
from any elected group, because almost all politicians are owned by the same
financial backers. That favorite theme of 'the Party Platform' has no teeth, and
becomes obsolete the second 'the selection' is over. But the most outrageous
thing about politics in America is that Americans are not allowed to hold
political opinions that disagree with those currently in-charge: and it matters
not at all which "party" is in office. The insult that adds to this injury comes
when you introduce terms like "bi-partisanship" or that's "playing politics":
for the record: Even the act of breathing is political!

The money that supports all of you-is
the same money that sends our jobs offshore, cuts our retirement, slashed our
social benefits, destroyed education, paved, drilled and polluted the
environment into borderline conditions that now threaten the entire planet, and
is murdering all life in the waters of the world. That money is the same money
that supports the censorship of anything that is not in agreement about
entertainment content, books, radio or television, that might attempt to throw
any light on what's really going on. The media under the FCC must be
reconfigured so that there is an actual public guardian involved in keeping the
airwaves of America open to more than one thought or one opinion, especially
"during a time of war." 'Everybody Knows' this is true-but until you and your
people begin to do their jobs, this totally censored and nearly fascistic
dictatorship will only get worse.

One footnote: The flaw in the ointment
of Absolute Power-ruling absolutely is that all people will be affected by the
results of the global designs of the New World Order-because these criminal
policies will decimate the filthy rich as well. It's happened hundreds of times
in history when the rich thought they could control everything only to be killed
by their own house servants, or destroyed by the complete collapse of the
economies they destroyed because, in their lust for power, they killed off too
many of the talented people who kept things working.

Listening to your public pronouncements
is painful because in many ways you are so clueless. The handwriting is on every
wall in blood, yet you proceed as though this was Norman Rockwell's 1957 instead
of The Decider's 2007. The Decider has had hundreds of chances to 'get-it-right'
in Iraq but all he has succeeded in doing is to have wrung the worst possible
outcome from every opportunity that he's been given: having produced in that
process the very things he said we were going to war to prevent! If this were a
company and he was CEO-you'd be a major member of the Board of Directors. Name
one company that has ever existed in which a total failure was allowed to stay
in office after six full years of total and utter FAILURE! That's six years of
near total monetary collapse, (the largest public debt ever in history) a
country that outsources all its best jobs while entering into contracts to
destroys what remains of its own work force, and at the same time tries to drive
away the few people who manage to survive that onslaughts created to steal
whatever might be possibly be left to steal.

This same fictitious company has
completely perverted the so-called 'justice' system along with the courts, not
to mention the completely sold-out congress of the United States. Congress
approved each and every criminal now in office: ironically the criminals
probably outnumber the non-criminals, in the upper levels of this
administration-yet no questions are ever asked.

You have a huge job to do Nancy and
half-measures won't make the grade. So far you've been too cute by half, and not
nearly tough enough to matter to anyone very much. You want to go down in
history-then be prepared to get dirty and lose a few of those overly involved
and financially interested "advisors" that brought you to this point. This is
not a corporation, this is a flesh and blood nation on the edge of real and
lasting anger over what has happened to this country. Changes are needed, and
you're the Woman-of-the-Hour. The public has been waiting and waiting and
waiting and waiting and waiting for The Decider to decide to decide what to do.
Pre-empt him, tear up his License ­to-Kill, cut off all his supplemental
spending, charge his Vice President with the crimes he's involved in, and since
his incompetent commanders will not have the money: the troops will have to come
home. That would be how this government should "Support the Troops"! Do it now
because we've all waited overlong to end this nightmare NOW!

The daughter of
Thomas D’Alesandro Jr., a former mayor of Baltimore, Pelosi
grew up in a Democratic family with Jewish neighbors and
friends.

“She likes to say
that, growing up in Baltimore, she went to a bar or bat
mitzvah every Saturday,” Amy Friedkin, a former president of
AIPAC and a friend of Pelosi’s for 25 years, wrote in an
e-mail message to JTA.

Friedkin noted that
there’s even a soccer field in the Haifa area of
Israel named after the lawmaker’s family.

Really??? Wow.
Impressive.

How many Catholic
Americans do you think have israeli land dedicated to their
families?

Well, now you know one.

While the
Republicans had campaigned partly on the premise that
support for Israel among Democrats has waned, exit polls
from Tuesday’s voting show that Democrats won an
overwhelming majority of the Jewish vote.

With Pelosi as
speaker, Jewish activists and officials are confident that
the U.S. Congress will remain strongly pro-Israel.

“I’ve heard
her say numerous times that the single greatest
achievement of the 20th century” was the founding of the
modern state of Israel, Friedkin wrote.

“She has
been a great friend of the U.S.-Israel relationship during
her entire time in Congress and is deeply committed to
strengthening that relationship.”

Sam Lauter, a
pro-Israel activist in San Francisco, has known Pelosi for
nearly 40 years. He was 5 years old when the Pelosis moved
into his San Francisco neighborhood, he recalls. The two
families lived on the same street.

“She’s one of the
classiest,” most “straightforward people you could ever
meet,” Lauter said. “She’s incredibly loyal.”

I'm sure she is - the
question is TO WHOM?

Lauter said the
Pelosis used to attend the first night of the Passover seder
at his parents’ house.

“As far as
the Jewish community is concerned, she feels our issues in
her soul,” he said.

To illustrate his
point, Lauter told a Pelosi story that has become
almost legendary in the Jewish community.

At an AIPAC members
luncheon in San Francisco right after the Sept. 11 terror
attacks, Pelosi was speaking when an alarm sounded.

This “wasn’t
something done purposefully to show everyone that Nancy
Pelosi supports the Jewish community,” he said. It
“actually came from inside her.”

You would think that
being an American congresswoman in America, that if any anthem
'came from inside' this woman's heart, it would be an AMERICAN
one.

But, according to AIPAC
and clan, putting America first would be anti-semitic.

Rabbi Doug Kahn,
director of the Jewish Community Relations Council in San
Francisco [is] confident that Pelosi, as speaker,
will be effective in persuading people with a broad range of
views on the Middle East, the importance of maintaining
bipartisan support for Israel.

hen it comes
to Israel, “she truly gets it,” said Matt Dorf, a
consultant to the Democratic National Committee. he
gets “Israel’s value and asset to U.S. security” and its
“importance as the only democracy in the Middle East.”

William Daroff, vice
president for public policy for the United Jewish
Communities, the federation system’s umbrella group and a
Republican himself, said the lawmaker has helped
ensure federal funding of Jewish family service agencies and
Jewish hospitals and has supported government programs and
policies that Jewish organizations value, such as Medicare
and Medicaid.

He also noted that
Reva Price, Pelosi’s liaison to the Jewish community for a
year and a half, came from the Jewish Council for Public
Affairs, the umbrella group of local community relations
councils.

Bringing on
board such an insider was “really a masterful stroke,”Daroff
said.

Price, he added, has
done a wonderful job of playing “traffic cop” with Jewish
organizations and in making sure that Pelosi’s
agenda is in tune with that of the Jewish community.

She’s been
"a real champion of making sure the Jewish community is well
served,”Daroff said of the lawmaker. "I’m
sure she’ll continue to be a champion.”

Forgive me if what I'm
about to say sounds a tad insensitive to the Jewish cause, but
WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF US?!!

WHO WILL BE OUR
CHAMPION IN FIGHTING FOR OUR RIGHTS TO SPEND OUR
TAX MONEY AS IT BEST SERVES OUR INTERESTS???

HUH?? HUH??

DO TELL ME, please.

However, I should give
credit where credit is due.

Pelosi isn't completely
controlled by zionists. Occasionally, a sliver of inner
conscience peers through the thick zionist exterior to catch a
glimmer of daylight.

Some Republicans, in
fact, questioned Pelosi’s support for Israel this
summer.

The congresswoman
ended up removing her name as a co-sponsor from a House
resolution supporting the Jewish state during its war with
Hezbollah because it did not address the
protection of civilians.

So, there is some hope,
albeit very little.

God knows, I didn't hear
her cry foul yesterday when 17 women and children were murdered
in their sleep by israeli shells.

"If evidence of participation by
other nations in Iran's nuclear program is discovered, I will insist that
the Administration use, rather than ignore, the evidence in determining how
the US deals with that nation or nations on other issues," she said.

The Pelosi family has a net worth
of over $90 million, mainly from Paul's investments. Paul Pelosi,
Italian/Catholic/Crypto, was a New York investment banker turned San
Francisco real estate developer. He is president of Financial Leasing
Services, a venture-capital company in San Francisco. He is a stock trader
with millions in Microsoft, Amazon.com and AT&T.

Relationship to Nancy Pelosi:
Husband of nearly 40 years.

Occupation: President of Financial
Leasing Services Inc. of San Francisco, specializing in real estate and
venture capital investments.

How they met: While a student at
Trinity College in Washington, D.C., Nancy D'Alesandro took a class at
Georgetown University and met undergraduate Paul Pelosi, a San Francisco
native. After they married, Paul and Nancy Pelosi in the mid-1960s returned
to San Francisco, where they raised five children.

The role he plays: While Nancy
Pelosi has pursued a political life, Paul Pelosi has helped maintain her
financial independence, in addition to being what many consider the model
political spouse, providing emotional and practical support that has freed
his wife to pursue her political interests.

"You cannot have a career in
politics as a married woman unless you have incredible support from your
mate,'' said Roz Wyman, a long-active Democrat and close friend of the
Pelosi family. "Paul's support is immeasurable.''

Quote: "I've made a conscious
effort to not be involved or give the appearance of being involved in her
political career. People should realize that she's the one.''

Pelosi Gives A Pep Talk To AIPAC
The Democratic leader in her own words

By Mark Gaffney 11-11-6

Rep. Nancy Pelosi's recent speech to the
Israeli-American lobby (AIPAC) ought to be a clarion call for peace activists.
Her address did not contain any big surprises. But it is, nonetheless,
remarkable for its transparency. The speech (see below for the text) affords a
up-close look at what Pelosi thinks about Israel, the Palestinians, the Mideast,
and nukes.

It's worth a look too because Pelosi's
beliefs on these matters are not a departure. Most of the Democratic Party
leadership espouse similar ideas. The bipartisan voting record of Congress in
recent years on Mideast issues proves this to be the case. Remember, this is the
party that's supposed to represent the grassroots, i.e., we the people. So what
is the Democratic leader of the House doing, anyway, giving a pep talk to the
second largest lobby in Washington? Indeed, to the lobby of a foreign power?
It's a question more Americans ought to be asking.

Most of the speech is the same old
stuff. I draw your attention only to several points:

Pelosi denies that the key issue is
Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza --- at a stroke repudiating
numerous UN Security Council Resolutions that the US voted for and supposedly
still supports. But clearly, that's no longer the case, and hasn't been for many
years.

The real issue, she states, is the
survival of Israel. This is the familiar mantra by which anything and everything
becomes possible. Only, there's a minor catch: The statement isn't true and
hasn't been since probably 1949.

If nothing else, Pelosi is well-versed.
She recites another familiar line, the one about how there was no partner for
peace until Arafat expired, when light suddenly came flooding in. Pelosi makes
it clear that in her view the Palestinian leader Abbas' real job is to serve as
policeman for Israel. Evidently, his legitimacy largely depends on this. Looking
after the best interests of his own people comes in a distant second.

But her most revealing statements
concern nuclear proliferation, and they show why the Democrats (who don't get
it) are no improvement over the Republicans (who always get it wrong). In fact,
the Democrats may be even more dangerous, precisely because there is still the
perception in the land, however mistaken, that the Democrats are the party of
enlightened ideas. I would be willing to bet that most registered democrats are
not aware of how extreme their elected Democratic representatives are on these
key issues. Nor can most thus have a true sense of how dire the situation is.

According to Pelosi, the biggest danger
to Israel today comes from Iran, whose nuclear ambitions, though still unproved,
also threaten the US. Her perspective contains the seed of ominous things to
come, because, after all, something will have to be done about Iran, right? Yes,
and soon.

Meanwhile, Pelosi manages to overlook
Israel's brutal treatment of the Palestinians, which undoubtedly is the greatest
danger to Israel, by far, and comes from within. Nor does she mention Israel's
massive nuclear, chemical and biological weapons arsenal. But her statements
additionally contain the tacit and troublesome assumption that the only people
in the region who matter are Israelis and Americans. Everyone else, virtually
the entire population of numerous countries, though no less imperiled by nuclear
weapons (arguably even more so), simply don't count in this calculus. In fact,
Pelosi's remarks are implicitly racist for this reason.

The shocker, though, also near the end,
is where Pelosi takes the US and Israeli nuclear monopoly in the region for
granted, as if this were a good and necessary thing. The purpose of the NPT in
her view is to shut down the rogue proliferators, who by definition are always
those other guys, never us. It's the stuff of which nuclear nightmares are made.
I would also bet that the vast majority of people who live in the Mideast take
sharp issue with Pelosi's thinking, and probably have a bone to pick with her
about where the actual threat lies.

George Washington, our founding father,
who warned against entangling alliances, must be turning over, about now. But
don't take my word for it. Read Pelosi's speech (which follows) and draw your
own conclusions.

Mark Gaffney is the author of Dimona:
the Third Temple?, a pioneering 1989 book about Mordechai Vanunu and the Israeli
nuke program. Mark's latest book is Gnostic Secrets of the Naassenes. Mark can
be reached for comment at mhgaffney@sbcglobal.net

After Waco and other crimes, the people
voted Democrats out of Congress -- but what they got was a new crop of
Republican congressmen led by Newt Gingrich who backed Clinton on every major
policy of the money-power agenda -- he called it the "Contract with America" --
it as a fake set of reforms that no one wanted and no one asked for (but which
made certain plutocrats evern richer)

And now Madame Chairman is serving up
the same crap -- the people voted Democrat in reaction against the things Bush
is doing for the money-power elite -- but when they are voted back in power, the
Democrats pull a Gingrich -- the bait and switch -- they feed people a different
agenda other than the agenda the people wanted and voted for!

Why did you vote for the Democrats?

1) Will they repeal the Patriot Act?

2) Will they reinstitute the Writ of
Habeus Corpus and Posse Comitatus?

3) Will they eliminate Bush's 2007
Military Commissions Act?

4) Will they seek to impeach Bush &
Cheney?

5) Will they withdraw from Iraq?

6) Will they reopen and conduct a
legitimate 9/11 investigation?

7) Will they roll back globalization to
restore the middle classes?

No chance.

Here is Nancy Pelosi stating her
"agenda" (and asking for money)

"Together, we can set a new course for
America. Nowhere did the American people make it clearer that we need a new
direction than in the war in Iraq. We are committed to finding a new solution to
Iraq, but we know that actions speak louder than words.

"That's why we will go forward with our
"Six for '06" agenda:

* To make our country safer by
implementing the 9/11 commission recommendations

* To make our economy fairer

* To make college and health care more
affordable

* To move toward energy independence

* To guarantee a dignified retirement

* To do this in a fiscally sound way
with civility, integrity, and bipartisanship.

--------------

Well, ladies and gentlemen, not only is
"Six for 6" NOT what we voted for -- it itself is also code for very bad
legislation, rife with all kinds of corruption and pork are behind each of her
platitude goals.

'Implementing the 9-11 Commission
recommendations' means accepting the Commission's UTTER WHITEWASH and going
ahead with more police state measures.

'Making the economy fairer' means taxing
the middle class and further crushing small business -- without touching the
multi-national economy, big corporations and big finance and anarcho-criminal
laissez-faire.

'Making college and health care more
affordable' means regulation and loss of freedom and rationing according to
political formula

'More towards energy independence' means
not implementing new energy forms to compete with oil -- but new taxes and costs
placed on oil use to further exploit/strangle families and small business

A 'dignified retirement' means this is
where the votes are. We have a very aged population -- but what does this mean
and who will pay for it? (certainly not the richest)

Do this 'in a fiscally sound way' means
taxing the middle class, taxing the small business while letting the
billioniares off free -- the Democrats are owned by the corporations, by the
Zionist billionaires

Note carefully the following: Ruppert
Murdoch -- who brings you Hannity, etc. -- is for Hillary Clinton in 2008.
Pelosi is in the Hillary Clinton circle (with Diane Feinstein, etc.) We are in
for more crime -- and lots of pretend "opposition" that really isn't opposition
at all. They will debate losts of phony issues and the media will help them --
while what really matters stays stolen and the world continues its course of
death and rot.

Supporter of Endless U.S. Occupation in Iraq

Supporter of Brutal Israeli Occupation of Palestine

Congresswoman
Nancy Pelosi, House Democratic Leader, has a reputation of being a "liberal".
She has been elected to represent San Francisco, a city known for its
progressive history in supporting labor, civil liberties, and the cause of
peace. Yet while giving lip-service to some of these causes, she has often been
the spokesperson of an unjust status quo. Pelosi may be called a "liberal", but
she is very much opposed to liberation.

Pelosi's history of support for the military occupation of
Palestine, her unqualified support for Sharon's policies, exposes Pelosi not as
a woman of principle, but is just one example of Pelosi's dedication to
the politics of ruthless expediency. By not questioning U.S. policy,
and supporting the policy of special interests (like AIPAC, an
organization that seeks to keep U.S. policy in line with the needs of Israel),
she has gained great power, and may very possibly be the next Speaker of the
House. Yet, her subservience to the militaristic approach in regards to
Israeli/Palestinian conflict has come at great cost to the people of the region,
especially the Palestinians who suffer from military occupation, and also to
those Israelis who work tirelessly to stop the violence done in their name.
It is also an affront to the people of Bay Area who have a very different set of
values, who believe in co-existence based on justice instead of military
occupation extended through brute force.

Pelosi & Iraq

Pelosi has again shown herself to be
completely out of touch with her constituents after she voted against a
modest proposal offered by Congresswoman Woolsey that would
eventually remove the U.S. military from Iraq.

Pelosi has "requested" to President Bush
that he produce a give a report to Congress on what conditions he plans to
remove the troops from Iraq. A careful reading of what Pelosi proposes
and you will see this:

“Specifically,
my amendment would require that the President, within 30 days of the enactment
of the defense appropriations bill, submit to Congress a report identifying the
criteria that will be used to determine when it is appropriate to begin to bring
our troops home from Iraq.
It does not require the troops to be brought home by a particular date; it
requires only that the means for judging when they can be brought home be shared
with the Congress. " - Nancy Pelosi Press Release

Pelosi is responding to pressure from those who want an end to the nightmare in
Iraq, and we can see she is already feeling the heat.

Update! Pelosi supports Murtha Resolution. Previously had not called for
immediate withdrawal, Pelosi changes her tune.

In late November, Nancy Pelosi offered support
for the Murtha resolution. This resolution is one of the best offered in
Congress so far, despite some serious shortcomings. On the plus side, it says
that the US should withdraw, without qualifications about what the political
situation in Iraq. On the negative side, it asks for redeployment "over the
horizon", meaning Kuwait or some such place, leaving US troops and military
bases in the Middle East. See Here
for a good and brief analysis of the proposal. Beyond the shortcomings of the
resolution, Nancy still insists on funding the war. She also continues to
support the most extreme policy positions of the Israeli government.

There is no doubt that our work has made a difference in Pelosi's position on
the war. Now let us continue to demand that she take a fair position on the
question of Palestine, and cut off all funding for this illegal, immoral war in
Iraq.

2 days left until we protest the pro-war policies of Nancy Pelosi!

See Pelosi's Voting record, as
compared to other Bay Area Congresspeople. Go Here.

Other Voices on the Extremism of Pelosi, and in
Her Own Words and Deeds

"Pelosi Win Not a Progressive Victory"

Zunes clearly delineates
howPelosi's assent to a leadership position is not a progressive
victory.

Excerpts:

When Amnesty International
released a report harshly critical of Israel's brutal re-invasion of the
Occupied Territories in October 2002, Pelosi, a member of the so-called Human
Rights Caucus in Congress, rushed to the side of fundamentalist right-winger
Congressman Tom Delay, Republican from Texas, supporting his resolution in
support of Israeli military actions, and effectively attacking the credibility
of Amnesty International.

She then went on to support a
resolution for increasing military aid to Israel.

Pelosi voices support for
Apartheid Wall in West Bank.

The 400 mile apartheid
wall (see more on Wall here)
being built by Israel mostly inside the West Bank, is prompting much criticism
from normally quiet, acquiescent governments, including even (muted) protests
from the Bush administration (Bush describes it as a "problem", because it
"snakes through the West Bank", and has even threatened to decrease loan
guarantees because of the Wall). Currently the International Court of Justice,
better known as the World Court, is considering a case regarding its legality.

Yet here again Pelosi leaps to the side of
Sharon. She has signed a letter that says that there should be no pressure on
Israel to conform to International Law. The letter puts it more deceptively, of
course, and it says "the U.S. must never pressure Israel to take a position or
action which would jeopardize the security of its citizens." See the full
letter here.We see here another example of Pelosi positioning herself to the political
right of Bush.

Pelosi Defends Assassination as a Political Tool.

In a move many see as encouraging ever-escalating violence
in the Middle East, Nancy Pelosi has endorsed the targeted killing of
Palestinian resistance leaders. She chastised President's Bush mild (and
qualified) rebuke of the Sharon regimes use of U.S. Apache Helicopters in
"targeted killing" (actually, missile strikes in densely populated
neighborhoods, that usually result in the death of many bystanders) of leaders
of resistance groups, where Bush said he was "troubled" and said that they may
impede progress towards peace.

See the San Francisco Chronicle report on Pelosi's
extremist stand here.

Pelosi speaks before the
American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)

In April of 2003, Pelosi spoke to AIPAC, the
self-described "most important organization affecting America's relationship
with Israel". In this speech, she again reiterated her commitment to Israel's
security: "America's commitment to the safety and security of the State of
Israel is unwavering." Left out was any mentioning of the security of the
Palestinian people whose land Israel Occupies.

More Excerpts and some questions:

Pelosi says: "No injustice, real or imagined, can ever
justify, and no future can ever be built upon, the calculated slaughter of
innocents."

To which I would respond with these simple questions, does
that include the calculated destruction of homes and farms of innocents by
U.S.-supplied bulldozers by the Israeli military? Does that mean she is saying
no to the use of a U.S. helicopter gunship on the children protesting the
destruction of their homes in Rafah, Gaza? (See
Here)

And when Pelosi says this:

"The world must never accept in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, or
Haifa what the world would not tolerate in London, Washington, New York or San
Francisco."

I ask this:

Pelosi, why do you accept, indeed, endorse, the
kinds of disregard for human rights by the Israeli military in Rafah, Nablus,
Jenin, Palestine what the world would not accept elsewhere? Could this not be
the root of the violence and insecurity you supposedly deplore?

Call Pelosi's San Francisco office and demand an
end to our tax dollars being used for the Israeli military occupation of
Palestine. Pelosi's office phone number is (415)556-4862

Download and Distribute flyer on Pelosi's support
for war on Iraq and US support for Israel's policy of continued occupation and
dispossession of Palestinian land. This flyer also includes a call to protest
at her San Francisco office on September 26, 2005

House minority leader Nancy Pelosi
(D-CA), in an interview with Lesley Stahl of CBS News, said impeachment would be
"off the table" if Democrats take over the House of Representatives in November,
calling it a "waste of time." She couldn't be more wrong, and most Americans
know it.

While Pelosi was responding to a loaded
question from Stahl, who couched impeachment in terms of Democrats' supposed
desire to seek revenge if they retake Congress, Pelosi, who would become
majority leader in a Democratic House, bought into Stahl's argument, saying that
she'd be "satisfied" to see the president and vice president spending the
remaining two years of their second term as "lame ducks."

What Stahl should have asked Pelosi was
whether she thought that President Bush had violated the law and the
Constitution, and whether she believed he has committed impeachable offenses.

The answer to that is clearly yes.

Rep. Pelosi must know most of the
president's crimes are not partisan at all. They are crimes against Americans of
all stripes, and against liberty and the Constitution.

Just take the president's order to the
National Security Administration to spy on Americans without first seeking a
warrant. A federal judge in Detroit has already found that the president
violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act--a felony--and the Fourth
Amendment. That is an impeachable act, and one which Democrats and Republicans
alike would punish if they understood the the implications of what the president
has done. Given that the secret FISA court has only rejected a handful of
warrant requests out of over 70,000 made since 1978, the only reason Bush could
have decided to violate the law is that he is doing something so outrageous he
knew the hand-picked, top-security-cleared FISA judges would have rejected it
out of hand.

Or take the signing statements. This
president has used so-called "signing statements" to render inoperative over 800
laws or parts of laws passed by Congress, claiming that he has the authority to
do so because he is a commander in chief in time of war (the so-called "War" on
Terror). Rep. Pelosi claims that if she becomes House leader, Democrats will
want to pursue a positive, progressive political agenda, yet this will be
clearly impossible if the president is allowed to simply continue issuing
signing statements invalidating any laws passed by a Democratic Congress.
Signing statements cannot be overridden, and if Democrats were to attempt to
pass legislation outlawing them, Bush could veto that legislation--or render it
inoperative with another signing statement. The only way to stop this
unconstitutional usurpation of the founding principle of tripartite government
is to impeach the president for blatant abuse of power.

This too, is an issue that Republicans
and Democrats should agree on, for if this president is permitted to ignore laws
passed by the Congress, then subsequent presidents (perhaps a President Hillary
Clinton or Barak Obama?) could also do it, citing the continuing "War" on
Terror, and the Bush precedent.

Does Nancy Pelosi believe that the
president's lies and deceptions and the conspiracy by his administration to
trick the nation into a disastrous invasion of Iraq is not grounds for
impeachment? Nearly 3000 Americans have died as a result of that deceit, and
nearly 40,000 have suffered grievous wounds, while the US military has been
stretched to the breaking point, leaving the country unable to respond to
genuine threats. Surely the author of this ongoing national nightmare must be
punished, so that future presidents will not attempt to do the same thing.

These are only some of this
administration's crimes. Others include:

Bush's role in attacking, and then
covering up the attack on former ambassador Joseph Wilson and his CIA agent
wife, Valerie Plame--a crime that was committed to discredit Wilson and
discourage reporters from probing more deeply into his revelation that the
documents used to claim Iraq was trying to buy uranium ore from Niger were
obvious forgeries, and into who was behind those forgeries in the first place.

Bush's authorization of torture as a
policy for captives in Afghanistan, Iraq and in the nebulous, endless and
borderless "War" on Terror. The president, in an act of desperation, has gotten
the currently Republican Congress to ram through a bill granting retroactive
immunity to all those, including himself, who authorized or engaged in torture,
but this should not deter a Democratic Congress from seeking impeachment for an
action that remains a violation of international law, that places American
troops at greater risk, and that has destroyed America's image around the globe.

Bush's criminally negligent handling of
the Katrina disaster in New Orleans.

The rot of corruption in the
administration, highlighted by the Abramoff lobbying scandals, which clearly
reach right into the Oval Office, despite the president's initial lie that he
didn't know Jack Abramoff.

Bush's refusal to testify under oath and
on the record before the 9-11 Commission, and his refusal to provide officials
and documents demanded by the commission regarding what the administration knew
before the attacks and how it responded to what it knew. This obstructionism by
the White House has been called close to an act of treason by former Sen. Bob
Graham, who until the end of 2002 was the chair of the Senate Intelligence
Committee, and who has said if he were currently in the House would be the
subject of a bill of impeachment.

Rep. Pelosi may think Americans don't
want impeachment, but, like many Democratic leaders, ' simply out of touch.
Indeed, the congresswoman will find a resolution on impeachment on her own
ballot when she goes home to San Francisco to vote this November (a resolution
that is likely to pass handily). Meanwhile, a new Newsweek magazine poll finds
that fully 51 percent of all Americans believe that the president should be
impeached--more than half of them saying this should be a priority. That same
poll finds that 20 percent of Republicans think the president should be
impeached, with one in four of those saying it should be a priority for the next
Congress. These are astonishing figures when you consider that support for
impeachment of President Bill Clinton never got higher than 36 percent, even at
the height of his impeachment process.

Maybe Rep. Pelosi should start listening
to the voters, instead of to her campaign strategists.

More importantly, she and other
Democratic-and Republican--members of the House should recall that oath they
took when they assumed office, which commits them to "support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

The Constitution these days is under
relentless assault by an enemy in the White House. Defending it is not a "waste
of time" Ms. Pelosi; it is your sworn duty.

Dave Lindorff is the author of Killing
Time: an Investigation into the Death Row Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal. His new book
of CounterPunch columns, titled This Can't be Happening!, is published by Common
Courage Press. Lindorff's latest book is The Case for Impeachment, co-authored
by Barbara Olshansky. Visit his website for more information. Lindorff may be
reached at dlindorff@yahoo.com. This story is published in the Baltimore
Chronicle with permission of the author.

"I think it is finally time we
stood up and thanked Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the darling Democrat from the Bay
Area who leads her party in the House. Pelosi's recent speech to the
Israel-American lobby AIPAC, the second largest lobby in Washington, was
monumental ­ truly unparalleled in its candor.

Despite the fact that AIPAC was
recently busted for spying on the United States, Pelosi, along with many
other top bureaucrats from Washington, gushed effusions of praise on the
foreign power. "There are those who contend that the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict is all about Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza," Pelosi
said as she rallied AIPAC loyalists. "This is absolute nonsense. In truth,
the history of the conflict is not over occupation, and never has been: it
is over the fundamental right of Israel to exist.""

(1)

So long as there is this deeply
rooted conflict of interest in Nancy Pelosi's heart, she is not fit to serve
American government or American values: because what is good for Israel has
not been good for the USA. Iraq is Israel's war, not ours! Nor is this the
first time that Americans have died to promote an Israeli agenda-but it
should absolutely be the last time that this is allowed to happen. Remember
the USS Liberty? (2)

Bush continues to say that he will
stay in Iraq until 'the mission is completed'. So what is this super-sacred
mission which no one in this government wants to spell out for the public?
First it was a Regime-Change, modified to include the WMD that this
government maintained was everywhere in Iraq. That was proven to be nothing
but a pack of lies. Then there was 'Freedom & Democracy' ­ the same freedom
and democracy that the Bushwhacker's have been methodically demolishing for
the last five years in this country. Yet the Decider is trying to give some
form of it to Iraq, while denying every aspect of those founding principles
to all Americans!

Our reason for remaining in Iraq is
that 'the Decider' can't stand the thought of the scale of his failures that
all this effort has become. Iraq is not Palestine, and we are not Israel-nor
will America spend the next half century in Iraq-especially since we're
still paying for the fifty-eight years of Israel's murderous wars of
conquest.! So much blood and treasure expended, just to appease the
extravagant plans of such a tiny nation that harbors so much hate and envy
for that which is not theirs. So-Representative Pelosi, until you make your
loyalties clear and on the record: you should not speak for this country. No
member of this government should be supposedly serving the United States
when their loyalties are so freely given to any other government, besides
the one you swore an oath to protect and defend: against all others, whether
foreign or domestic.

What happened on November seventh
was a victory for "republican-light" But that does not expunge the previous
nearly six years of "no questions" coupled with total submission to whatever
'the Decider chose to do-regardless of how deeply those decisions might cut
into the fabric of our laws and the muscle of our way of life. These long
years of this frontal assault has been relentlessly carried out against
every facet of this nation. This cannot be so easily forgotten in one night
of mid-term 'adjustments' in the Bush- War-upon-the people of the United
States.

"The Democrats" want to throw more
crumbs to the disillusioned, with you at the helm to guide these minor
adjustments. But what is this nation without its constitution, without the
freedoms that others earned? Will you see to it that those questions are
finally investigated-fully? The list is long and damning; do you or your
congress have the stomach for that? 'The Decider' said today that he would
not be swayed by "politics' in what he chooses to do about 'the mission in
Iraq.' Yet 'politics' is precisely what all wars are all about, and the
specifics of those 'politics' matter greatly, especially when they are basic
to any free republic: Hence Bush cannot simply 'leave politics out of his
decisions,' no matter how much he'd like to.

You and Congress and the Cabal have
been responsible for melting the moral compass of this nation in the
vanquished flames of an Empire that cannot be achieved. The course that Bush
set this nation on, with the nearly total acquiescence of the congress, was
a path that attempted to exempt USA incorporated from the global guidelines
for all modern warfare. The goal was for the world see the USA as a law unto
itself. Iraq was to showcase a display of American Imperial Power-a power
that could never be militarily resisted. By our actions we wanted to
intimidate the world into believing that we can do whatever we want, without
allies, anywhere, anytime-because any resistance to the American-Israeli
Empire would always be futile. Instead what has happened clearly
demonstrates, to anyone with eyes that we have invested all this time and
treasure into nothing but death, destruction and a level of
national-disillusionment that surpasses even the blood-drenched failures in
Viet Nam. See the results of the Israeli war on Lebanon for details of their
variation on this same theme of Imperial immunity to all resistance. In this
case Hezbollah proved that resistance is not futile! (3)

The attacks on America have
continued non-stop since 911, they just haven't yet begun to use bullets and
bombs on the population: except for the psy-ops manipulation and the
non-stop swirl of government propaganda that haunts every waking moment. But
thanks to your utter failures in directing these wars: the psychology of our
"superiority" has effectively been shattered (for the outside world) by the
hourly failures in all we've undertaken to accomplish, since 'the Decider'
was appointed by the court. And speaking of courts - Cheney has announced in
advance that if he is called before congress he will not testify-will you
insure that in any investigation all those directly involved will be subject
to the rule of law?

What is the Mission Pelosi ­ Bush
can't answer that simple question, can you? One thing it did not accomplish,
contrary to the Decider's beliefs: We have not taken the attack "to the
enemy," as promised. Another thing that we have accomplished is that we have
insured that the 'enemy' we went to fight is now vastly larger and more
powerful than it was before we unilaterally invaded either Iraq or
Afghanistan. The results of 'the Decider's' actions, coupled with the
spineless 109th congress, in which you played your part, has created the
very kind of powers these wars were supposedly launched to prevent.

Welcome to the upper-echelons of
power Nancy, but know this: there is very little time left to correct this
barbaric course that has been brutally shaped over the last nearly six
years-and if you fail, there will be no second chance to have a
constitutional Republic worthy of the name - because (thanks to a dual set
of books) - all that damage done to the financial structures on which this
nation actually depends, is approaching bankruptcy at an incredible rate of
speed. But then maybe that's the only thing that will be able to interrupt
the Decider's plans for what was once a viable and promising nation.

One more thing: what about all the
thousand illegal 'signing statements" that the Decider made to render
congress toothless? Will they be 'negotiated-away' as proof of good faith-or
will he simply keep adding new ones to everything that you and congress work
out together? Make no mistake-the secret's out! There is only one party in
this country, and it doesn't represent the people who work here, just those
who profit from the labor of the victims of your criminal leadership. The
best way to prove that I'm wrong Nancy is just as simple as something Bush
also said today ­"just perform!"

We missed the boat when voters
insisted on playing the two party system scam again.

The citizens say they want to keep
more of their hard-earned money in their pockets, they want health care
reform, they want their jobs to stop pouring out of the country. But that
can't and won't happen until we settle the Israel/Palestinian problem. 14 in
one family were killed today by the Israeli army. It won't happen until we
stop the tens of billions of dollars going into the Bush fraud 'war on
terror.' We need complete electorial reform and there needs to be a criminal
investigation for fraud and treason while the Bush junta is still in power.

Remember how Pelosi said she would
have supoena power...and then did a complete turn around and said: "there
will be no impeachment under her rule"? Remember?

So, what makes you think it will be
easy and honest now with the Democrats in control of the House? Did you
forget how they have voted FOR the Bush/Cheney illegal, outrageous,
treasonous anti-Constitution, anti-Bill Of Rights 'Patriot Act'
legislation...and how they support Bush's butcherous, hideous Iraq war? And
how most of them continue to give the most racist, dangerous nation on Earth
billions and billions of our tax dollars to continue building its
thermonuclear arsenal while carrying out the genocide of the Palestinian
people...not to mention paying for the recent slaughter in Southern Lebanon?

What tiny piece of the pie of
change will you be satisfied to eat...at the expense of the meat and
potatoes we'll all starve for?

Labor law reform? Unions leaders
need to get busy getting their act together, too. Remember the last time we
had 'Democratic control' in power and how we were promised labor reform?
They didn't deliver that either.

Insiders and power brokers,
blackmailers, AIPAC, JINSA, ADL and mega corporate money and incfluence run
BOTH parties. When will Americans get a grip on that reality? Pelosi is a
LIAR. End of story. She will continue to sit down with the village idiot at
luncheons and dinners and decide whether she'll have chicken or poached
salmon.

She said in her election day speech
that the Democrats must get the PAC money and the corporate interest out of
politics. Same old rhetoric. Same old BS. And don't forget how she has
virtually pledged her soul as an Israeli First Lady. So, you can count on
our tax dollars continuing to pour into that festering pocket of deceit and
anguish-causing country non-stop. The 'Democrats' will vote to continue to
kill for Israel directly and indirectly every step of the way. Nothing will
change.

Next, the dumb Dems will begin to
push the Hillary ticket for 2008, claiming it will make all the difference
in the world when the Democrats take complete control of Washington. Hillary
is not a labor friendly candidate, either. Her prodigiuos, egregious record
of gross hypocrisy and opportunism speaks for itself. And yet she may well
end up being the next democrat Presidential choice.

And one more time: the Pro Patriot
Act/Pro War Dems are supported by their own group of corrupt corporate lords
and masters, and scores of special interest groups?

If you rejoice in this
insignificant amount of change in Washington, then you, my friends, are very
easy to please (read: deceive), indeed.

What a frigging joke.

Is there hope? Gee...three
independents were voted in.

Good luck.

Meet The New
Boss, Same As The Old Boss

Will Democrats repeal and impeach or salute and
follow? Mobbed-up establishment sycophant Nancy Pelosi is nobody's savior,
as sacrificial lamb Rumsfeld steps down

The Democrats have swept the House
and the Senate may well follow but did 7/11 really herald the defeat of the
Neo-Con agenda or will establishment sycophants like Nancy Pelosi hijack and
misdirect legitimate discontent and shield Bush from impeachment while
blocking efforts to repeal legislation he passed?

Pelosi is widely tipped to become
speaker of the house but she is already on the record as saying that no
impeachment proceedings against President Bush, whether it be for
deliberately lying a nation into war or being complicit in 9/11, will take
place.

"Impeachment is off the
table....it's a pledge....it is a waste of time," Pelosi told 60 Minutes
recently.

In effect Pelosi is giving the
Neo-Cons a blank check to send thousands more American soldiers to their
deaths and conduct untold further egregious assaults on the Constitution
over the next two years.

If George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and
Donald Rumsfeld are allowed to tear apart the very fabric of America without
consequences then what is to stop a President Hillary Clinton or John McCain
doing the same?

There's no doubt about it, to see
frothing Neo-Cons who have been strutting around like John Wayne for the
past five years finally eat humble pie is a breath of fresh air, but let's
not be so deluded as to think that the Neo-Con agenda, which took decades to
craft, was simply brushed aside by the victory of a party that has supported
Bush every step of the way on major issues.

Nancy Pelosi voted
for the war in Afghanistan, for the Patriot Act, for Homeland Security and
against a bill that simply condemned torture of prisoners in Iraq. Pelosi is
the pro-torture "savior" who we are told will keep in check the pro-torture
Bush administration.

As blogger Kurt Nimmo points out,
"Making Bush and Cheney—that is to say, the neocons—lame ducks will add a
jolt of adrenalin to the neocon plan to decimate the Muslim and Arab Middle
East, lest the neolib faction, under a Democrat president and Congress, go
back to its old ways, that is, instead of mass murdering Iranians in one
fell swoop, imposing the sort of sanctions levied against Iraq under
Clinton, resulting in the slow death of 1.5 million Iraqis, 500,000 of them
children."

"We can only hope, when the day
finally arrives, Nancy Pelosi will be paraded before the world in her
stylish orange jumpsuit, along with Bush, Cheney, and the vile neocons."

As is to be expected, her record on
immigration is horrible, in almost every case Pelosi has opposed legislation
that would prevent illegal immigrants from abusing rights only afforded to
American citizens under the U.S. constitution.

Gun Owners of America, a real
organization dedicated to defending second amendment rights unlike the
co-opted NRA, gave Pelosi zero per cent two years running for her record on
gun control and she routinely scores an F minus, the lowest possible
approval rating.

Will the now advanced plan to
decimate US sovereignty and impose tracking and taxation controls on vehicle
travel across the country under the NAFTA Superhighway be reversed under a
Democrat House and Senate? No.

Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, the main
bulwark preventing the creation of the North American Union, is routinely
attacked by leading Democrats such as Pelosi and Rangel.

After Chavez called Bush the
devil at his UN speech Pelosi branded Chavez a "thug," which is quite rich
considering Pelosi's mobbed-up father, Thomas D'Alessandro, let the Mafia
have free reign over Baltimore in the 1940's after he was elected as Mayor.

Will the Military Commissions Act,
the very bill that effectively nullifies nine of the ten amendments to the
U.S. Constitution be repealed under a Democrat House and Senate? Time will
tell but it seems highly unlikely.

Will the army of surveillance
cameras that have invaded American streets via Homeland Security grants be
curtailed under a Democrat House and Senate? If anything big government and
Big Brother will only get bigger.

Will increased pressure be heaped
upon Bush to bring American troops home from Iraq, save the isolated echoes
of dissent from lone dissidents like Murtha? No, and if Hillary Clinton
rides the wave of Bush discontent all the way into the Oval Office, she has
already promised to expand the so-called war on terror.

Will an independent investigation
into the Bush administration's complicity in 9/11 be ordered under a
Democratic House and Senate? No - and the same goes for lying about pre-war
Iraq intelligence - Pelosi has already brazenly proclaimed that Neo-Con war
criminals will have safe passage.

Pelosi is an obedient adherent to
the phony doctrines of the "war on terror" and her recent comments that “The
war in Iraq is making it harder for America to fight and win the war on
terror,” only go to show that she disagrees on the minutia of where the
troops should be on the map, not whether they should be there at all.

The worst case scenario, that the
mid-terms would provide an endorsement of illegal eavesdropping, torture,
imperial hegemony and the revoking of the bill of rights, has thankfully not
been realized. The American people have rejected the Neo-Con agenda and
dealt it a symbolic blow.

Donald Rumsfeld has been offered up
as the sacrificial lamb and top Neo-Con architects have abandoned Bush.

All the more reason for the elite to
re-arrange the deck chairs and give an enflamed electorate a safe steam
valve and a token victory before the fun really begins after 2008, meanwhile
the same policies of big government, Big Brother, crackdown on dissent,
destruction of sovereignty, and occupation of sovereign nations will
continue - all under the stewardship of hierarchy brownnoser Nancy Pelosi.