If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Re: Minn. trade (no not Garnett)

Eddie Griffin is a defensive and rebounding machine. He has shot blocking ability and can hit the open three (31% career). I was thinking Bracey cause of shooting but James White would play over him anyways

Re: Minn. trade (no not Garnett)

Eddie Griffin is a defensive and rebounding machine. He has shot blocking ability and can hit the open three (31% career). I was thinking Bracey cause of shooting but James White would play over him anyways

While EG would be a great fit on the court, off the court he wouldn't be a guy the Pacers want to touch, period.

As for Bracey, he is a chucker but isn't that athletic and versatile player I think Bird is after. I think that if the Pacers really want to add shooting, there are better opitions out there than Bracey Wright.

BTW spreedom, what do you mean Minneosta wouldn't take on Foster's contract? He is one of the fairest payed players in the league, IMO. His contract is easily acceptable.

Re: Minn. trade (no not Garnett)

While EG would be a great fit on the court, off the court he wouldn't be a guy the Pacers want to touch, period.

As for Bracey, he is a chucker but isn't that athletic and versatile player I think Bird is after. I think that if the Pacers really want to add shooting, there are better opitions out there than Bracey Wright.

BTW spreedom, what do you mean Minneosta wouldn't take on Foster's contract? He is one of the fairest payed players in the league, IMO. His contract is easily acceptable.

I think the last thing Minnesota would want is to take on more salary.. especially since it seems like their entire roster is under contract for another 4 years...