This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our world. Watch and become AWARE!
3.5 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.

Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Following the chemical attack in Syria, Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY) warned that the first casualty of war is the truth, and he questioned what we were told about the attack and who was responsible as the Trump administration launched an unconstitutional attack on a Syrian airfield.
Now, an MIT professor and weapons expert is challenging the official
narrative and asking for the Trump administration to refute his
conclusions.
On Tuesday, Congressman Massie posted to Facebook an article in which Theodore Postol of MIT says there is no concrete evidence linking Assad to the attack.
"I think it's important to collect all the facts before forming a
conclusion, and I assure you I will do that," wrote Massie. "Here's an
article that challenges the current media narrative about what happened
in Syria. I hope the intelligence community will present evidence to
Congress to address the apparent inconsistencies highlighted in this MIT
professor's review of the publicly available facts."
Mr. Postol is a leading weapons academic and formerly a scientific
advisor at the Department of Defense (DoD). He claims that the chemical
weapons attack in Syria was staged. This obviously questions who was
responsible, and he comes to the same conclusion that we have come to
here, the Islamic State in the area, not Assad.
"I have reviewed the [White House's] document carefully, and I
believe it can be shown, without doubt, that the document does not
provide any evidence whatsoever that the US government has concrete
knowledge that the government of Syria was the source of the chemical
attack in Khan Sheikhoun, Syria at roughly 6am to 7am on 4 April, 2017."
Postol said.
"In fact, a main piece of evidence that is cited in the document
point to an attack that was executed by individuals on the ground, not
from an aircraft, on the morning of 4 April," he adds. "This conclusion
is based on an assumption made by the White House when it cited the
source of the sarin release and the photographs of that source. My own
assessment is that the source was very likely tampered with or staged,
so no serious conclusion could be made from the photographs cited by the
White House."

An image from the suspected crater of a chemical weapons attack in Khan Sheikhoun, Syria.

"The explosive acted on the pipe as a blunt crushing mallet," Postol
said. "It drove the pipe into the ground while at the same time creating
the crater. Since the pipe was filled with sarin, which is an
incompressible fluid, as the pipe was flattened, the sarin acted on the
walls and ends of the pipe causing a crack along the length of the pipe
and also the failure of the cap on the back end."
Keep in mind that Khan Shekhoun is an area controlled by anti-Assad
Islamic terrorists, the same terrorists that have pledged their
allegiance to the Islamic State.

"No competent analyst would miss the fact that the alleged sarin
canister was forcefully crushed from above, rather than exploded by a
munition within it," Postol said. "All of these highly amateurish
mistakes indicate that this White House report, like the earlier Obama
White House Report [from Ghouta in 2013], was not properly vetted by the
intelligence community as claimed."
Postol says the report by White House Intelligence is a "politicisation" of intelligence findings.
"I have worked with the intelligence community in the past, and I
have grave concerns about the politicisation of intelligence that seems
to be occurring with more frequency in recent times – but I know that
the intelligence community has highly capable analysts in it," he added.
"And if those analysts were properly consulted about the claims in the
White House document they would have not approved the document going
forward."

Nesaranews Mission Statement

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?

Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

11

Followers

The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.