Have seen numerous accounts as high as 71 of 103 shot down. USA said all made their target. Has any reliable data
come out on this matter? Syria has an assortment of Russian hardware with some reports saying this was a good test of Russian hardware.
That was a lot of missiles fired for a few targets.
Anyone have reliable info?

Trump was mocking the Syrian's attempts to shoot down our missiles so I suspect it's likely true. Considering the loathing so many in our federal bureaucracy have for this President - if the Syrian defenses actually had shot down our missiles it's likely the information would have leaked from our government by now, if for no other reason than the embarrass the President.

BEIRUT -- The Russian military indicated on Wednesday it will supply the Syrian government with a sophisticated air defense system following Moscow's condemnation of the missile attack launched by the United States, Britain and France earlier this month. Col. Gen. Sergei Rudskoi said Russia will supply Syria with "new missile defense systems soon."

Rudskoi's statement did not specify the type of weapons, but his remarks follow reports in the Russian media that Moscow is considering selling its S-300 surface-to-air missile systems to Syria.

Top Russian officials said that in light of the airstrikes on Syria earlier this month, Moscow may reconsider a pledge it gave a decade ago not to provide Syria with the S-300 system. The strikes were in retaliation to an April 7 suspected chemical weapons attack in the town of Douma, near Damascus, that killed more than 40 people.

You would think aerial photos would give an indication of how many cruise missiles hit home. Some being shot down would not be a surprise. Did the USA use decoys, jamming or other tactics to improve the success?

You would think aerial photos would give an indication of how many cruise missiles hit home. Some being shot down would not be a surprise. Did the USA use decoys, jamming or other tactics to improve the success?

As a very wise Chinese guy named Lao Tzu once said, 'There is no greater danger than underestimating your opponent.'

But, what one can see on the ground is only one target visibly destroyed, no damage anywhere else; and no casualties either (but that's more because Trump, with his loud-mouthing on Twitter, gave them plenty of warning and more than enough time to prepare and evacuate and hide everything lol)

Yeah... it was just a demonstration, and a weak one at that.

And Putin's people didn't even fire a shot or launch a missile as far as I know.