NOTICE: ON APRIL 30th 2014 THE CBR FORUMS WERE RESET AND ALL USER ACCOUNTS WERE CLOSED. TO JOIN THE NEW CBR FORUMS ALL PREVIOUS USERS NEED TO RE-REGISTER. All users, both new and returning, are expected to follow the CBR COMMUNITY STANDARDS & RULES.

If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

If I said she was weak in the general, who was going to win if not Trump?

You posted often when SCOTUS picks were brought up that there was no way Trump would win, so you didn't even have to consider the possibility. That doesn't sound like someone convinced that Hillary was going to lose, and you weren't the only one to hold such opinions.

Originally Posted by numberthirty

Again... If you didn't even bother to show up in one state you lost during the primary and rarely showed up in another you lost during the primary, I am going to need to see Ivan Drago holding a ballot box before "Interference" actually starts to get anywhere close to the damage that plain old "Not Bothering To Show Up" did.

Because we all know how fair your standard of evidence is when it comes to Clinton, especially when others do the exact same negative things she did or even worse with excuses like 'Businessman' and the like to pass off the hypocrisy of the double standard. I'm of the opinion that to deliberately ignore and discredit all the thumbs on the scales of the last election is to blind oneself to reality, and I'm sure I'm not alone in that.

Because we all know how fair your standard of evidence is when it comes to Clinton, especially when others do the exact same negative things she did or even worse with excuses like 'Businessman' and the like to pass off the hypocrisy of the double standard. I'm of the opinion that to deliberately ignore and discredit all the thumbs on the scales of the last election is to blind oneself to reality, and I'm sure I'm not alone in that.

If you have evidence that she actually set foot in Wisconsin during the general, I would be interested in seeing it.

Otherwise, the map of exactly how Trump won Wisconsin looks very much like the map of how Walker won -

- Election
- Recall
- A Second Term

If someone has a reason that pattern would not logically repeat itself in a state a presidential candidate never set foot in during a general(in addition to losing said state in the primary), that would be interesting.

Proof that foreign intervention played anything close to an equal role would also be interesting.

So yeah Tami if you read this, that is basically why the next election in my country are going to be "establishment vs anti-establishment" people are just tired of the corruption down here, we need someone who actually is able to crush corruption.

It seem like Turkey is using refugees and migrants as a weapon against Europe and it shows, Turkey forced one of the biggest aid group to shut down their operation in the country leaving 360.000 refugees without the care they need, the name of the aid group is mercy corps.

And now Erdogan is calling turks "the future of Europe", telling them to have big families so they can outnumber native europeans, it seems he is trying to stir nationalism sentiments so he can get more chances in the referendum in April.

I'm glad to know nothing outside of Wisconsin mattered to you, it explains so much.

Look...

If folks want to present even remotely plausible ways that it is not voting patterns repeating themselves in places where someone did not show up and do the campaigning they should have but some other elements that actually created the outcome, great.

In order to do so, those folks are going to have to be able to minimize what even President Obama has pointed to being the case.

Sure. Those things account for a statewide voting pattern repeating itself almost exactly in a state where someone did not campaign during a general election.

I'm sure Comey and the media set up a long game making sure Walker's election numbers would be in place.

Look, she had polls, lots of them, pretty much all of them, telling her she would win those states (primaries not being generals and all that), so she decided to go for the long game and try to turn the South blue for elections to come. If the FBI had not sabotaged her at the last minute, it likely would have worked and we would be praising her as a visionary now for turning Georgia blue.