*The task of setting up a process to manage our planned [[OWASP Project Reviewers Database|Reviewers Drive]] has been pushed forward. Please note the second table is still being populated.

−

**The task of setting up a process to manage our planned [[OWASP Project Reviewers Database|Reviewers Drive]] has been pushed forward.

+

**Thoughts?

−

***The second table is still being populated.

+

−

***Thoughts?

+

| valign="middle" bgcolor="#EEEEEE" align="left" colspan="0" |

| valign="middle" bgcolor="#EEEEEE" align="left" colspan="0" |

+

*The outcome was considered fit for purpose.

+

*Dinis asked for changing the column [http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Project_Reviewers_Database#tab=Project_Reviewers.2FVolunteers 'Projects I would be interested in reviewing'] to allow it receiving text, i.e. to allow the volunteers to specify their broad interests instead of obliging them to point out project names and its links.

+

*Due to lack of GPC's members attendance, this item will be dealt with again next meeting.

***As a result, M. Boberski has raised a set of questions about the criteria. Please see them [http://docs.google.com/View?id=dcn8962c_63fgm7gbfd '''here'''].

+

***As a result, M. Boberski has raised a set of questions about the criteria. Please see them [http://docs.google.com/View?id=dcn8962c_63fgm7gbfd here].

−

***Dinis has built a FAQ wiki page to answer M.and to more broadly make our responses available for future assessment criteria's users. The FAQ wiki page can be accessed [[Assessment Criteria v2.0 FAQ|'''here''']].

+

***Dinis has built a FAQ wiki page to answer M.and to more broadly make our responses available for future assessment criteria's users. The FAQ wiki page can be accessed [[Assessment Criteria v2.0 FAQ|here]].

***Please find the spare cycles to help to answer the above referred questions.

***Please find the spare cycles to help to answer the above referred questions.

| valign="middle" bgcolor="#EEEEEE" align="left" colspan="0" |

| valign="middle" bgcolor="#EEEEEE" align="left" colspan="0" |

+

*Due to lack of GPC's members attendance, this item will be dealt with again next meeting.

|-

|-

| valign="middle" bgcolor="#EEEEEE" align="left" colspan="0" |

| valign="middle" bgcolor="#EEEEEE" align="left" colspan="0" |

Line 48:

Line 53:

**Regarding the creation of covers for OWASP Books, Brad proposes we move the process to a volunteer, without buying the source files.

**Regarding the creation of covers for OWASP Books, Brad proposes we move the process to a volunteer, without buying the source files.

| valign="middle" bgcolor="#EEEEEE" align="left" colspan="0" |

| valign="middle" bgcolor="#EEEEEE" align="left" colspan="0" |

+

*Due to lack of GPC's members attendance, this item will be dealt with again next meeting.

Latest revision as of 09:10, 4 February 2010

Please see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda and the Dial-In details

AGENDA - Fev 03, 2010

Item/Issue

Decisions/Comments Made

Current Meeting

The task of setting up a process to manage our planned Reviewers Drive has been pushed forward. Please note the second table is still being populated.

Thoughts?

The outcome was considered fit for purpose.

Dinis asked for changing the column 'Projects I would be interested in reviewing' to allow it receiving text, i.e. to allow the volunteers to specify their broad interests instead of obliging them to point out project names and its links.

Due to lack of GPC's members attendance, this item will be dealt with again next meeting.