Why don’t we do blood tests to diagnose cancers?

I was browsing through the Internet and read about blood tests that can be done to diagnose cancers. It seems very simple and straight forward to me so why we see little of this done here?

Vaughn

Dear Vaughn,

Indeed there are blood tests that can be done to give indications of the possibilities of having or developing a cancer. These are called tumour markers; for example CA125 is a noted marker for ovarian tumours. These tests are available locally and are used by doctors in their assessment of patients.

There has always been and still continues to be the hunt with âtumour markersâ that are specific to a cancer. That has eluded science so far as though that there are tumour markers fir certain cancers they are not specific to any one cancer and indeed not specific to cancers alone. CA125 which is an established marker for ovarian tumours can be present during other non-cancerous gynaecological conditions. Some markers may not even increase during cancers or may only do so when the disease is far advance.

The reality is that we have to combine all other methods in assisting in diagnosing cancers. We are not near to the Star Trek era of a quick scan and you are done.

Share

A 69-minute documentary film, which reveals the shocking truth about hair, politics, and racial...

Posted on December 18, 2018

Share

Two firetenders honour the inaugural American Airlines Flight 1427 with a water salute just after the flight arrived at the Argyle International Airport on
Saturday at 3:40 p.m. (Photo: St Clair Scott)