As seen on

6 Reasons to Bet on the U.S. Dollar in 2018

They’re steadfast in warning that you can’t live on perpetually-expanding debt… or money printing… or zero interest policies. Mainstream economists have been lulled into believing such things don’t have serious consequences, while history clearly says otherwise. Gold bugs aren’t fooled.

But that’s where my love for gold bugs ends.

They have two fatal failings.

The first is that they believe gold is always a storehouse of value… and mostly in inflationary times like the 1970s.

The second is their… I can only call it “seeming ignorance”… about the U.S. dollar.

They’re smart people, so I just don’t understand how they can’t better understand the value and power of the world’s reserve currency.

And, quite frankly, it was laughable recently when Peter Schiff, who I have often debated, accused ME of not understanding the dollar. Ha!

That’s why, in the first Boom & Bustissue of 2018, which subscribers received earlier today, I explain why the U.S. dollar is the real ultimate safe haven (and in so doing prove that Peter’s comment was an unqualified pot shot).

The reality is that I’ve been right about both gold and the dollar since the 2008 crisis. He and his fellow gold bugs have maintained that gold prices would soar to the moon, and dollar prices tank, as the greatest money printing scheme in history unfolded.

However, gold collapsed after peaking in late 2011, and has remained stuck in a low range ever since… and is heading much lower in the next few years.

In the meantime, the dollar has mostly appreciated since early 2008, and as I showed paid readers, I have reason to believe that it’s going to have a substantial rally again in 2018 before it finally becomes more fairly valued. After that it could be more up or down, but still could lean towards the upside.

Really, gold bugs get three very important things dead wrong:

1. They think that because we have been printing money at unprecedented rates, the dollar will crash; likely dropping close to zero. Either they’re smoking some good pot or they don’t understand that currencies trade relative to each other, and therefore cannot drop to zero, unless they fail like in Zimbabwe – which is rare.

2. They believe money printing at such high rates will cause hyperinflation at some point, especially when central banks continue to escalate their efforts exponentially during the next financial crisis. The trouble with that is, it’s been nine years since QE and unprecedented stimulus efforts began, and countries the world over have barely been able to stave off deflation! That’s because we’re in a deflationary period of declining money velocity from the aftermath of the greatest debt bubble in history. And if we fall into an even deeper crisis (as they and I predict), especially after such massive money printing, it will be a sign that none of it works.

Tell me, how are central banks going to sell their plan to Joe Public to go from printing $12 trillion globally to $100 trillion to stave off the next crisis after the last $12 trillion failed? There’s just no way!

3. And perhaps the most egregious of all: They think that governments are on a never-ending inflation campaign to devalue the dollar and make their debts cheaper to pay off. I’ll grant you, there is an element of truth to that. After all, who wouldn’t want to make their debts cheaper? But the fact of the matter is that the dollar hasn’t been devalued to the extent they expound.

They’re always throwing around the classic chart that shows that adjusting the dollar for the expansion of dollars since 1900 has resulted in the green back being devalued 97%. It’s all utter tripe!

They don’t understand – and neither do most economists – that the very productive process of rising urbanization and greater specialization of labor requires much more delegation of tasks and hence, much greater financial transactions by consumers – meaning more dollars relative to GDP – through physical currency and credit. Such productivity greatly outweighs the inflation of the money supply. If it didn’t, our standard of living adjusted for inflation wouldn’t have gone up more than eight times adjusted for inflation since 1900!

As I said, I’ve belabored points two and three in numerous places, so for the January issue of Boom & Bust, I focus on the one that’s gotten the least attention. And Charles Sizemore, our Boom & BustPortfolio Manager, is positioning readers in a very interesting play that will profit from the strong year the dollar will have in 2018.

If you haven’t read your issue yet, do so now.

Harry

P.S. As this is the last working day of 2017, I’d like to take this opportunity to thank you for your time and support throughout this year. Happy New Year to you and your family. I warn that 2018 could be a rough year for the markets, for many reasons that I’ll elaborate on in the next few weeks, but with us by your side, I’ve no doubt it’ll be yet another profitable one for the books.

Harry studied economics in college in the ’70s, but found it vague and inconclusive. He became so disillusioned by the state of the profession that he turned his back on it. Instead, he threw himself into the burgeoning New Science of Finance, which married economic research and market research and encompassed identifying and studying demographic trends, business cycles, consumers’ purchasing power and many, many other trends that empowered him to forecast economic and market changes.