Pages

Monday, September 28, 2015

Force and Energy 101

It’s not
easy to figure out cosmos without knowing the nature of force and energy. It
seems most people don’t, and that bothers me some. If you confuse force with
energy, everything from there will be complicated.

Force is momentum, and momentum have two opposite qualities:
- Contracting (orbital, gravitational, particle)
- Expanding (angular, radiating, wave)
These two are described in Newton’s 3:rd Law as motion and velocity. They
are the most fundamental aspect of our physical universe as described in the conservation of
momentum.

Energy is how force manifests in mass. To create energy, forces must interact
as stated in Newton’s 3:rd Law: To every
action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two
bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts. Because
Newton was not familiar with particle-/wave duality, he didn’t know that the
mutual actions on a microscopic level was of orbital and angular momentum. Newton’s
“bodies” are equal to the quality of mass
which is caused by a pairing of orbital and angular momentum creating a
twisted helix, a particle/wave. So particle-ness is caused by orbital momentum,
and wave-ness by angular momentum. On a microlevel, they are not mass by themselves, but cause
mass when interacting.
When not interacting, orbital momentum is gravity with infinite time, and
angular momentum is radiation with zero time. While separate, forces have zero
energy so they cannot be empirically observed, only inferred. An example of -
almost - separate orbital force is the black hole, or matter/energy if you
will. But keep in mind this “energy” is only potential. An example of - almost - separate angular force is the
cosmic background radiation, but since we can observe it, there is at least a
tiny fraction of orbital momentum there to twist it enough to cause a wave that
is not 100% linear. If it was, we wouldn’t pick it up.
It is reasonable to imagine that separated forces, when occurring as in a wave
collapse, will immediately be re-paired within the global system of energy.
We now see that mass is a quality of energy
that emerges/manifests when orbital momentum increases in relation to angular
momentum. That is, when the orbital part of energy contracts the angular, the
effect is what we perceive as mass. We
might define mass as an intermediate state of energy dependent on dual force
dynamics.

Now, all observable
energy has per definition both orbital and angular momentum, and therefore
amplitude, frequency and such wave qualities. This being the case, we can
simplify some equations to make matters clear.
- Energy is always a relation of angular and orbital momentum.
- Angular momentum causes space- Orbital momentum causes time

So E=mc2
means p2=E

Momentum p is always angular x orbital momentum, thus p2. Poetically put,
Energy is space times time. The p2 interaction causes Energy. That’s it! If you
want to impress Dalai Lama, you can say “Absolute Reality is One energy of Two
forces”, and I’m sure he will smile in delight.
The problem with E=mc2 is the implication the E is primary, and that forces are
hidden behind notions of mass and speed of light. What I’m trying to tell you
is that
- Forces are primary (p)
- Mass and speed are energetic manifestations of orbital and angular force (2)
- Energy is the effect, caused by forces (=E)

Based on
this you might want to look at equations on mass flow and the likes. How it
affects understanding on a quantum level is up to others to decide. I only know
basics, but being a hard-core physicalist, I’m pretty sure “below” and “above”
follows the same principles. Anyone who follows the above lead will instantly start
questioning most, if not all of mainstream science. Meditate on this and you
will have material for infinite articles. I’m not allowed to write them,
lacking the formal credentials, but would love to see someone else doing it.

One of many things to calculate is this one; if p2 = c2, at what relation
between orbital/angular momentum is potential energy extracted/emitted/released
as kinetic energy? That is, how much angular momentum must orbital momentum
absorb in order to emit light/photons?
My guess is that a unique quality of light is a balance of forces so that
quasars jets from black holes when the initial orbitality has bent enough
angularity to be overpowered.
Note here that, on the micro level, a particle is created when orbital momentum
forces angular momentum to bend full circle as to unite “there” with “here”. In
this way, angular force is conserved by orbital force. This is what causes
black holes to rotate at high speed, and in general what causes all forms of
rotation. But I guess that is better explained in a separate post. Today the
main thing was to clarify the relation force-energy and how E=mc2 is better
understood as p2=E.

For those
wondering about positive and negative energy, those two are caused by
whether orbital momentum is clockwise or counter clockwise or/and orbital momentum going in opposite direction to angular momentum. I'm not sure about the specifics here, only that momentum is the cause while charge is the effect. How that relates to
the arrow of time and the bending of angular linearity into circular linearity
will be dealt with some other day.