50 years ago we still only had 13000 students. Sam sits at 24000. But I get your point. Apples to oranges. 1973 starts the "modern" era. Scholarship limitations began. Sips gave out over 100 a year prior to that.

50 years ago we still only had 13000 students. Sam sits at 24000. But I get your point. Apples to oranges. 1973 starts the "modern" era. Scholarship limitations began. Sips gave out over 100 a year prior to that.

50 years ago we still only had 13000 students. Sam sits at 24000. But I get your point. Apples to oranges. 1973 starts the "modern" era. Scholarship limitations began. Sips gave out over 100 a year prior to that.

Miami and USC have small enrollments. And a lot of national titles.

A&M has one top 4 poll finish in its history. 80 years ago. You guys have just been mediocre to above average forever. You win 51 to 53 percent of your conference games. No matter the era. No matter the conference.

50 years ago we still only had 13000 students. Sam sits at 24000. But I get your point. Apples to oranges. 1973 starts the "modern" era. Scholarship limitations began. Sips gave out over 100 a year prior to that.

Miami and USC have small enrollments. And a lot of national titles.

A&M has one top 4 poll finish in its history. 80 years ago. You guys have just been mediocre to above average forever. You win 51 to 53 percent of your conference games. No matter the era. No matter the conference.

Yet we have a "Top 5" finish more recently than you. We've been better than you for a decade. We recruit better than you. We have better facilities and more money. We're better than you right now.

I find it hilarious that a team that's 16th in all time wins, out of 128 teams, is "mediocre." Texas hasn't dominated their own conference since the 1970's.

50 years ago we still only had 13000 students. Sam sits at 24000. But I get your point. Apples to oranges. 1973 starts the "modern" era. Scholarship limitations began. Sips gave out over 100 a year prior to that.

Miami and USC have small enrollments. And a lot of national titles.

A&M has one top 4 poll finish in its history. 80 years ago. You guys have just been mediocre to above average forever. You win 51 to 53 percent of your conference games. No matter the era. No matter the conference.

miami was nothing until they hired the raight coach at the right time and snowballed into 30 years of success. See Florida state for an example too.

Horn has had two good runs under KkkRoyal and Butterteeth. Outside of those two coaches your history is crap.

This is why we hate you people. You think entirely too high of yourselves.

50 years ago we still only had 13000 students. Sam sits at 24000. But I get your point. Apples to oranges. 1973 starts the "modern" era. Scholarship limitations began. Sips gave out over 100 a year prior to that.

Miami and USC have small enrollments. And a lot of national titles.

A&M has one top 4 poll finish in its history. 80 years ago. You guys have just been mediocre to above average forever. You win 51 to 53 percent of your conference games. No matter the era. No matter the conference.

Yet we have a "Top 5" finish more recently than you. We've been better than you for a decade. We recruit better than you. We have better facilities and more money. We're better than you right now.

I find it hilarious that a team that's 16th in all time wins, out of 128 teams, is "mediocre." Texas hasn't dominated their own conference since the 1970's.

And yet no national titles for 80 years. And 20 years without a conference title.

And no you aren't recruiting better than us. We just signed two top three composite classes in a row. And are about to clean up 2020 as well.

50 years ago we still only had 13000 students. Sam sits at 24000. But I get your point. Apples to oranges. 1973 starts the "modern" era. Scholarship limitations began. Sips gave out over 100 a year prior to that.

Miami and USC have small enrollments. And a lot of national titles.

A&M has one top 4 poll finish in its history. 80 years ago. You guys have just been mediocre to above average forever. You win 51 to 53 percent of your conference games. No matter the era. No matter the conference.

Yet we have a "Top 5" finish more recently than you. We've been better than you for a decade. We recruit better than you. We have better facilities and more money. We're better than you right now.

I find it hilarious that a team that's 16th in all time wins, out of 128 teams, is "mediocre." Texas hasn't dominated their own conference since the 1970's.

And yet no national titles for 80 years. And 20 years without a conference title.

And no you aren't recruiting better than us. We just signed two top three composite classes in a row. And are about to clean up 2020 as well.

Uh, yes. We are. We signed a better class than yours and kicked the **** out of you in Texas. Why is this surprising? We have Jimbo Fisher. You have an alcoholic, mentally unstable guy from Conference USA that's most consistent achievement to date is losing to terrible teams.

You haven't won a conference title in a decade. And that's playing in the weakest league in the country. You've won 1 national title in 50 years.

50 years ago we still only had 13000 students. Sam sits at 24000. But I get your point. Apples to oranges. 1973 starts the "modern" era. Scholarship limitations began. Sips gave out over 100 a year prior to that.

Miami and USC have small enrollments. And a lot of national titles.

A&M has one top 4 poll finish in its history. 80 years ago. You guys have just been mediocre to above average forever. You win 51 to 53 percent of your conference games. No matter the era. No matter the conference.

Yet we have a "Top 5" finish more recently than you. We've been better than you for a decade. We recruit better than you. We have better facilities and more money. We're better than you right now.

I find it hilarious that a team that's 16th in all time wins, out of 128 teams, is "mediocre." Texas hasn't dominated their own conference since the 1970's.

And yet no national titles for 80 years. And 20 years without a conference title.

And no you aren't recruiting better than us. We just signed two top three composite classes in a row. And are about to clean up 2020 as well.

Uh, yes. We are. We signed a better class than yours and kicked the **** out of you in Texas. Why is this surprising? We have Jimbo Fisher. You have an alcoholic, mentally unstable guy from Conference USA that's most consistent achievement to date is losing to terrible teams.

You haven't won a conference title in a decade. And that's playing in the weakest league in the country. You've won 1 national title in 50 years.

Better class? No. The composite disagrees.

And we won a conference title in 2009. Embarrassing but we are fixing that. And played for a national title that year.

The last time A&M played for a conference title was 1998. We've played for 5 since then. And the last time you played for a national title was 1939.

Texas is a better school. With a far better athletic program. Only people who think otherwise are delusional aggies.

50 years ago we still only had 13000 students. Sam sits at 24000. But I get your point. Apples to oranges. 1973 starts the "modern" era. Scholarship limitations began. Sips gave out over 100 a year prior to that.

Miami and USC have small enrollments. And a lot of national titles.

A&M has one top 4 poll finish in its history. 80 years ago. You guys have just been mediocre to above average forever. You win 51 to 53 percent of your conference games. No matter the era. No matter the conference.

Yet we have a "Top 5" finish more recently than you. We've been better than you for a decade. We recruit better than you. We have better facilities and more money. We're better than you right now.

I find it hilarious that a team that's 16th in all time wins, out of 128 teams, is "mediocre." Texas hasn't dominated their own conference since the 1970's.

And yet no national titles for 80 years. And 20 years without a conference title.

And no you aren't recruiting better than us. We just signed two top three composite classes in a row. And are about to clean up 2020 as well.

Uh, yes. We are. We signed a better class than yours and kicked the **** out of you in Texas. Why is this surprising? We have Jimbo Fisher. You have an alcoholic, mentally unstable guy from Conference USA that's most consistent achievement to date is losing to terrible teams.

You haven't won a conference title in a decade. And that's playing in the weakest league in the country. You've won 1 national title in 50 years.

Better class? No. The composite disagrees.

And we won a conference title in 2009. Embarrassing but we are fixing that. And played for a national title that year.

The last time A&M played for a conference title was 1998. We've played for 5 since then. And the last time you played for a national title was 1939.

Texas is a better school. With a far better athletic program. Only people who think otherwise are delusional aggies.

Yet, 247 and ESPN disagree. And that's with 247 purposefully manipulating the rankings...with zero basis...in order to get Texas closer...FOLLOWED BY changing the rules and counting a transfer as a signee in order to get them ahead. Why didn't they count Hurts in OU's class? Oh right...because the OU would have passed Texas. A&M absolutely manhandled Texas in this state.

A better school? A&M graduates make more money. A&M graduates have a network that is virtually unmatched. Texas is slightly higher in what, US News? Yeah...they weren't when I went to A&M. Athletic program? The only thing Texas is better at are a few irrelevant sports that nobody gives a **** about.

50 years ago we still only had 13000 students. Sam sits at 24000. But I get your point. Apples to oranges. 1973 starts the "modern" era. Scholarship limitations began. Sips gave out over 100 a year prior to that.

Miami and USC have small enrollments. And a lot of national titles.

A&M has one top 4 poll finish in its history. 80 years ago. You guys have just been mediocre to above average forever. You win 51 to 53 percent of your conference games. No matter the era. No matter the conference.

Yet we have a "Top 5" finish more recently than you. We've been better than you for a decade. We recruit better than you. We have better facilities and more money. We're better than you right now.

I find it hilarious that a team that's 16th in all time wins, out of 128 teams, is "mediocre." Texas hasn't dominated their own conference since the 1970's.

And yet no national titles for 80 years. And 20 years without a conference title.

And no you aren't recruiting better than us. We just signed two top three composite classes in a row. And are about to clean up 2020 as well.

Uh, yes. We are. We signed a better class than yours and kicked the **** out of you in Texas. Why is this surprising? We have Jimbo Fisher. You have an alcoholic, mentally unstable guy from Conference USA that's most consistent achievement to date is losing to terrible teams.

You haven't won a conference title in a decade. And that's playing in the weakest league in the country. You've won 1 national title in 50 years.

Better class? No. The composite disagrees.

And we won a conference title in 2009. Embarrassing but we are fixing that. And played for a national title that year.

The last time A&M played for a conference title was 1998. We've played for 5 since then. And the last time you played for a national title was 1939.

Texas is a better school. With a far better athletic program. Only people who think otherwise are delusional aggies.

50 years ago we still only had 13000 students. Sam sits at 24000. But I get your point. Apples to oranges. 1973 starts the "modern" era. Scholarship limitations began. Sips gave out over 100 a year prior to that.

Miami and USC have small enrollments. And a lot of national titles.

A&M has one top 4 poll finish in its history. 80 years ago. You guys have just been mediocre to above average forever. You win 51 to 53 percent of your conference games. No matter the era. No matter the conference.

Yet we have a "Top 5" finish more recently than you. We've been better than you for a decade. We recruit better than you. We have better facilities and more money. We're better than you right now.

I find it hilarious that a team that's 16th in all time wins, out of 128 teams, is "mediocre." Texas hasn't dominated their own conference since the 1970's.

And yet no national titles for 80 years. And 20 years without a conference title.

And no you aren't recruiting better than us. We just signed two top three composite classes in a row. And are about to clean up 2020 as well.

Uh, yes. We are. We signed a better class than yours and kicked the **** out of you in Texas. Why is this surprising? We have Jimbo Fisher. You have an alcoholic, mentally unstable guy from Conference USA that's most consistent achievement to date is losing to terrible teams.

You haven't won a conference title in a decade. And that's playing in the weakest league in the country. You've won 1 national title in 50 years.

Better class? No. The composite disagrees.

And we won a conference title in 2009. Embarrassing but we are fixing that. And played for a national title that year.

The last time A&M played for a conference title was 1998. We've played for 5 since then. And the last time you played for a national title was 1939.

Texas is a better school. With a far better athletic program. Only people who think otherwise are delusional aggies.

Your class was fluffed up ratings in January. You know it. I know it. It's funny to watch you defend it.