In 1709 (or was it 1710?) the Statute of Anne created the first purpose-built copyright law. This blog, founded just 300 short and unextended years later, is dedicated to all things copyright, warts and all. To contact the 1709 Blog, email Eleonora at eleonorarosati[at]gmail.com

Thursday, 14 June 2012

What What! South Park parody is obvious fair use

The Electronic Frontiers Foundation say that “In an important ruling for
free speech” the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit had affirmed that a
parody of a popular online video "What What (In the Butt) was a clear case of fair use and that the District Court's early dismissal of the claim was correct and that early dismissals can be appropriate.

South Park aired the "What What (In the Butt) in the USA in a 2008 episode critiquing the popularity of absurd online videos. Two years later, copyright owner Brownmark Films sued Viacom and Comedy Central, alleging copyright infringement. Recognising the episode was an obvious fair use, Judge Stadmueller promptly dismissed the case. Brownmark appealed, claiming that fair use cannot be decided on a motion to dismiss, no matter how obvious. Viacom fought back, and the EFF filed an amicus brief in
support, explaining that being able to dismiss a case early in
litigation—before legal costs can really add up—is crucial to protect free
speech and discourage frivolous litigation.

The appellate court agreed, calling the District Court’s decision “well-reasoned
and delightful” adding that the court could ‘properly decide fair use’ at an
early stage …. despite Brownmark’s assertions to the contrary.

The EFF say that the opinion joins a growing body of precedent affirming that it's proper to dismiss some copyright cases early, and that it's possible in appropriate cases to determine whether a use is non-infringing without engaging in lengthy discovery. These rulings are important not only to protect speech, but also in fighting back against copyright trolls.
The EFF point out that trolls depend on the threat of legal costs to encourage people to settle cases even though they might have legitimate defences and citing EFF’s
brief, the Seventh Circuit (Chief Judge Easterbrook and Circuit Judges Cudahy and
Hamilton) seem to have acknowledged the problem.

Search This Blog

Would you like to receive each post by email?

2,804 readers now receive The 1709 Blog by email circular. Why don't you join them? To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button

email:

Folllow us on Twitter

The 1709 Blog, and some of the choice comments of its blog team on copyright topics, can now be followed on Twitter at @1709Blog. When we last looked, we had 2,214 followers so, if you sign up, you won't be alone!