(Chuck Muth) – U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) has proposed a bill titled, “Ending Support for Internet Censorship Act.” It essentially makes a law forcing private social media companies to be “politically neutral.”

Fighting for free speech by blocking the free speech of those blocking free speech? I must confess, I’m confused.

OK, I get this part…

It’s clear some of the current social media giants are censoring, and even banning, speech by conservatives whose opinions they don’t like. As such, conservatives are rightly ticked off – particularly at Facebook and Twitter.

But here’s the part I don’t get. Actually, two parts…

1.) Conservatives used to argue, rightly, that the First Amendment only protected the right to free speech from government control, and…

2.) That your right to free speech does NOT give you the right to use someone else’s soapbox to exercise your right.

Let’s start with #1.

This *should* be a no-brainer. The language of the First Amendment isn’t complicated. It’s actually crystal-clear. Heck, even AOC should be able to understand this…

“Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech.”

Let’s stipulate that Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies are, in fact, limiting, censoring and, in the words of our Founders, abridging the freedom of speech.

And yet there’s a group, including some well-known movement conservative figures, organizing a “Rally for Free Speech” in Washington, DC on July 6 which is advertising that…

“THE 1ST AMENDMENT IS UNDER ATTACK!”

“Our rights guaranteed under the United States constitution are being systematically violated,” DemandFreeSpeech.org states in their ads. “Join the rally to demand unbiased social media, and an end to censorship.”

This is so disappointing.

As a conservative wordsmith, I fully appreciate that “words mean stuff.”

That’s why conservatives insist on referring to our form of government as a “republic,” not a “democracy.” And it’s why conservatives are about to celebrate “Independence Day,” not the “Fourth of July.”

Now, I’ve got no problem with fighting for free, unbiased speech on social media platforms. But we should be intellectually honest enough not to intentionally mislead an often-gullible public into believing that what these tech firms are doing is a violation of the First Amendment.

It’s not.

And if we do, we’re no better than the liberals we’re trying to fight in the court of public opinion.

Liberals who call gun control “gun safety.”

Liberals who call abortion “family planning.”

Liberals who leave the word “illegal” out of debates over illegal immigration.

As for #2, let’s say you take up a new cause: Equal Rights for Oompa-Loompas.

As per the First Amendment, Congress shall make no law abridging your right to freely speak out on behalf of the oppressed, stigmatized and discriminated-against Oompa-Loompa community. However…

You have no right to force a newspaper to publish your letter-to-the-editor or op-ed on the subject.

You have no right to force a radio station to have you on as a guest to speak about your issue.

You have no right to demand that your local TV news cover your “Oompa-Loompa Rights Rally.”

And yet some conservatives are now arguing that conservatives have a RIGHT to post our opinions on Twitter and Facebook.

Worse, they’re asking Congress to step in.

That’s not us. We don’t run to the government for help.

Instead, we create COMPETITORS.

That’s why conservatives read the Washington Times instead of the New York Times.

Conservatives shouldn’t be backing legislation forcing private social media companies to open their platforms to us – which would be an actual First Amendment violation.

Instead, we should be creating and supporting competitive alternatives.

For example: If Twitter won’t honor free speech for conservatives, then maybe conservatives should check out Parler.com, a “non-biased free speech driven entity.”

Indeed, while Twitter has silenced the conservative voices of Roger Stone and Laura Loomer on its platform, you can now find them on Parler.

Wanna hit Twitter where it breathes? Simple. Stop using it. Switch.

In fact, I suspect all it would take is one 23-character tweet from President Donald Trump to his 61 million-plus Twitter followers – “I’m switching to Parler” – to turn Twitter into the next MySpace in the blink of an eye.

Sen. Hawley’s frustration with liberal social media bias is understandable.

His congressional effort to abridge the freedom of speech isn’t.

Mr. Muth is president of CitizenOutreach.org and publisher of NevadaNewsandViews.com. He blogs at MuthsTruths.com. His views are his own.

Tweets

Recent Photos

St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

Freedom

"Freedom" like life is fragile and delicate and can be ended without warning or fanfare or gradually like the sands of time.
Frank Neudecker

Kitty’s Place Very Comfortable 4 Blocks from Beach, 2 Blocks from Bay

Kitty's Place
Would you like to visit someplace nice... maybe just the two of you. Kitty's home is 5 years old, beautifully furnished, very family oriented. To Kitty your stay is important in that they strive to provide you with everything you need for your vacation or time away to relax.
Furnished with amenities for you to enjoy your vacation and fun in the sun. Very hospitable atmosphere, great beach, amusement parks only miles away, and shopping at a great Outlet Mall only minutes away. Newly installed above ground pool. Minutes to the famous Ft. Morgan. Great sunsets, beautiful waters, white sandy beaches. Very relaxing, very enjoyable.
Kitty's home is dog friendly and has it's own pool.
Email her at kittystuart65@gmail.com
You will love it.

What we stand For

There is one constant pledge that we live by and it is that our American Government is founded on the concept of the individuality and the dignity of the human being.
Underlying this concept is the belief that the human person is important because he was created by God and endowed by Him with certain unalienable rights which no civil authority may usurp.
The inclusion of God in our pledge or our money or in our courts and buildings further acknowledge the dependence of our people and our Government upon the moral directions of the Creator, our Father, the Lord God Almighty.
This is the principal of government and reporting that we stand by....

FAIR USE NOTICE:

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www. law. cornell. edu/uscode/17/107. shtml“