Responsible and sometimes critical comment on topical legal matters of general interest. This blog does not offer legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for professional legal advice.
Pro Aequitate Dicere

Here is the HTML version of the Bill as introduced to the Lords and Parliament has published a tracked version showing the amendments made by the Commons.

Background:

Since
accession to the EU in 1973, an enormous amount of law has flowed into the UK
via the European Communities Act 1972 (the ECA) - referred to in the Miller
judgment (para 65) as a 'conduit pipe.' The general scheme of the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill is to retain, with important exceptions (Clause 5); EU law as it exists
immediately before exit day and then to give (extensive) powers to Ministers to
alter things. Clauses 2 to 6 are concerned with Retention of
Existing EU law. This earlier post looked at the Bill as it stood upon its introduction to the House of Commons and Explanatory
Notes are available.

Retained EU Law:

Chapter 3
of the Report considers Retained EU Law and notes (para. 18) -
“Retained EU law” will form a discrete, novel and legally
significant category of law. As we concluded in our interim
report, “it is imperative,in the interests of legal certainty, that
there is maximum clarity as to what counts as retained EU law” on and
after exit day. In the rest of this chapter, we consider what
constitutes retained EU law. In the following chapters, we examine the
status of that body of law, the application of the “supremacy
principle” to it and its interpretation by the courts.

Three categories of Retained EU Law arise under Clause 2 to 4 of the Bill. The two categories coming under Clauses 3 and 4 are referred to in the
Report as "Retained Direct EU Law" though this term is not used in the
Bill.

EU-derived
domestic legislation” that is saved by clause 2. This includes
domestic secondary legislation made under the European Communities Act 1972 for the purpose of
implementing EU directives.

This is already either domestic primary legislation or domestic
secondary legislation. Under the Bill, it will have the same status
post-exit as it had pre-exit.

“Direct
EU legislation” that is rendered part of domestic law byclause
3. This includes EU regulations, EU decisions and EU tertiary legislation
(e.g. provisions made under regulations and directives) as they had effect in
EU law immediately before exit day.

Directly
effective EU law that is saved by clause 4. Clause 4 saves directly
effective EU law that had effect in the UK by virtue of the European Communities Act 1972 and
that is not already saved by clause 3. Clause 4 will therefore, for instance,
domesticate directly effective treaty provisions and (at least some)
provisions in directives that are capable of direct effect.

Chapter 4 notes that the Bill is silent as to the domestic legal status of retained direct EU law. The Status of Retained EU Law is considered in detail and the Committee makes an important recommendation.

Para. 39 states -"Whether a law counts as primary or secondary legislation is of fundamental importance in the UK legal system. Primary legislation in the form of Acts of Parliament is the product of a legislature that is sovereign, in the sense that it has legally unlimited powers. In contrast, secondary legislation is, by definition, made under limited powers that are capable of being unlawfully exceeded. This distinction has important consequences when considering the status of retained EU law under this Bill."

At paras. 40 to 42 the Report comments -

40. Broadly speaking, the Bill creates two types of “retained EU law”. The first type is “EU-derived domestic legislation” under clause 2. As we explain in Chapter 3, this category consists of domestic legislation that already exists. It is therefore already either domestic primary legislation or domestic secondary legislation; and under the Bill, it will have the same status post-exit as it had pre-exit.

41. EU-derived domestic legislation under clause 2 can be distinguished from “retained direct EU legislation” that is domesticated by clause 3 and other directly effective provisions of EU law that are domesticated by clause 4. (We refer to the law domesticated by clauses 3 and 4 collectively as “retained direct EU law”.) The crucial difference between EU-derived domestic legislation and retained direct EU law is that whereas the former already has a particular domestic status, the latter does not. Therefore, while the legal status of EU-derived domestic legislation is clear post-exit, the same is not true of retained direct EU law.

and at para 44 ...

"Retained direct EU law will be domestic law. There is no reason why Parliament cannot or should not assign to retained direct EU law a recognisable domestic legal status. The fact that retained EU law began life as something other than domestic law does not prevent Parliament from assigning it a domestic legal status once it becomes domestic law. Nor does the fact that retained direct EU law originated outside the domestic legal system provide any good reason for neglecting to assign it a domestic legal status once it is recognised as domestic law."

The Report goes on to comment (para 51) that "it is essential that all retained direct EU law has the same legal status for all purposes." The Committee therefore recommended (para 52) that "the legal status to be "accorded to all retained direct EU law for all purposes" should be "that of domestic primary legislation, as directly effective EU law is closely analogous to domestic primary legislation. This will secure legal continuity and certainty post-exit."

Many more points could be made about Chapters 3 and 4 and a full reading is crucial. Adoption of the committee's recommendations would result in far less legal confusion (and possibly litigation) post-Brexit.

A further post will look at Chapters 5 to 7 - The Supremacy Principle, Charter of Fundamental Rights, and Interpretation of Retained EU Law. A final post will look at Chapters 8 to 10 - Delegated Powers, Scrutiny of Delegated Powers, and Devolution.

About Me

I live in Greater Manchester but spend as much time as possible in N. Yorkshire. Politically, closest to the Lib Dems than any other! Life long interest in law about which there is much misinformation and misunderstanding. My blog seeks to look at topical items and their complexities and tries to explain things in a straightforward way. Obiter means "by the way" and my posts are "by the way." I hope that the posts are responsible, balanced and informative but it is for you, the reader, to make up your own mind. I do not seek to persuade you. At all times I will try to speak for fairness - Pro Aequitate Dicere.