09 December 2015

Calls For Gun Confiscation Have Begun

From the GOA:

The Left Calls for Confiscating Your Guns in Wake of California Shooting

ACTION: The anti-gun
Left is pulling out the stops and is now calling for gun confiscation.
We have to meet “fire with fire.” So forward this alert to ten people.
Encourage your pro-gun family and friends tosign up for GOA alerts. And, you can alsogive Gift Membershipsto your family/friends this holiday season. We need your support and activism more than ever!

The Anti-gun Left Declares War on Your Gun RightsDear Paul, President Obama took to the airwaves on Sunday night and told the nation we need more gun control.

Hillary Clinton -- the one who will most
likely be the Democrat nominee for president in 2016 -- recently called
for an all-out war on guns, as well. And then, for the first time since 1920, the New York Times published an editorial on the front page of their newspaper. This is important because the editorial page of the Times reflects the thinking of the anti-gun Democrat Left. And what is the theme of the Times' most important message in nearly a hundred years? In two words: Gun Confiscation.

Left “drops the gloves,” calls for gun confiscationThe New York Times said this weekend that:

It is past time
to stop talking about halting the spread of firearms, and instead to
reduce their number drastically — eliminating some large categories of
weapons and ammunition.It is not necessary to debate the peculiar
wording of the Second Amendment. No right is unlimited and immune from
reasonable regulation.

The Times continues that there would be no grandfather clause for the 300,000,000-plus firearms we currently own:

[I]t would require Americans who own these kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow citizens.

So there you have it. You need to give up your guns -- for the good of the country.Ironically, the editors at The Washington Post are furious with the Times for letting the “cat out of the bag.” They called the Times’ editorial “predictably polarizing.”

But as one insightful journalist noted, the Post editors are only upset because the Times’
piece confirms “every gun owner’s worst fear -- namely, that all the
talk about gun safety and reducing gun violence is just a sham, and the
real agenda of the gun control movement is total confiscation.”

Gun confiscation has always been the goal of the anti-gunLeftEveryone has known that a Hillary presidency would result in greater restrictions on our Second Amendment rights.

But now her mouthpiece at the Times has explicitly revealed what we knew already was the case -- the Left wants to CONFISCATE YOUR GUNS. Anti-gun radicals usually try not to say this publicly, because they know that talk of gun confiscation loses elections. But when caught on “candid camera,” they tell you they want to confiscate guns.

Take Maryland’s Deputy Attorney General -- a liberal Democrat -- who was recently caught on hidden camera stating “we should ban guns altogether, period.”Or remember when New York Governor Andrew
Cuomo (D) said, in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, that among the
different gun control proposals that were being bandied about, “[gun] confiscation could be an option.”Or when several Democrat state senators
were caught on an open microphone in New Jersey saying, “We needed a
bill that was going to confiscate, confiscate, confiscate.”This is their agenda.

Anti-gunners blame YOU for massacres like San Bernardino’sIn its editorial, the Times lambasted
pro-gun, Republican politicians who “abet would-be killers by creating
gun markets for them, and voters allow those politicians to keep their
jobs.”That’s what the Left thinks of you. They
think that your rights and freedoms … that your guns which have NEVER
harmed anyone -- are the problem because you are aiding and abetting
killers. These are the stakes we face in the 2016 elections. If Clinton wins, we can expect her to push the same Times’ agenda, which will include the elimination of “large categories of weapons and ammunition” -- probably by executive fiat. And we can expect the Obama-packed courts to roll over and ignore the “peculiar wording of the Second Amendment.”You have eleven months before the November, 2016, elections. And everything we believe in is at stake.Please forward this alert and encourage your pro-gun family and friends to sign up for GOA alerts.

Yes, it's that obvious. They think they can force Americans to surrender firearms. And when the armed rebellion begins - and it will - they think they can win. The only question is, how many will have to die to prove them wrong?

ML, I'm with you. They already know it won't be easy, hence the millions of rounds of ammo stockpiled by agencies that don't need them. Those agencies who think they do will know where to go for re-supply.

Guffaw, I don't think they have the manpower, but will start in isolated locations. It'll work only until the word gets out. Then 300+ million firearms in the hands of 100 million citizens (including some 20 million veterans) will be in play. "Bloody" may be too mild a descriptor.

Rob - that's a fair question, and I think we'll get both. Bloody civil war, with pockets of fighting all over the country ... AND several states will secede, knowing that the "general government" (as Jefferson called it) will be stretched too thin to do anything about it.

I firmly believe that our government is already stretched too line. Look at the Military, Carter cut it Regan had to build it up, our IIC (idiot in charge)has cut that again. Plus added so much to our debt, that my grandson's generation still will be paying it off, and his kids too. Sam is 2yrs old.

Followers

Found on the Blue Box

Proud Member

About Me

I believe in the Constitution, strength in national defense, limited government, individual freedom, and personal responsibility as the concrete foundation for American government. They reinforce the resolve that the United States is the greatest country in the world and we can all be eternally grateful to our founding fathers for the beautiful legacy they left us today. Above all, we must remember that all of man’s freedoms come ultimately from God.

This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, and as such this constitutes 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Act. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.