For nearly four decades, the US federal government has maintained a “ban” on exporting domestic crude oil supplies. It’s been a cornerstone of the national energy landscape since President Ford signed the 1975 Energy Policy and Conservation Act into law in pursuit of that perpetual goal of American politicians, energy independence.

Although the legal framework includes a number of exceptions—allowing exports of North Slope Alaskan and heavy California crude, as well as exports to Canada, among other loopholes—big oil companies have had the ban in their crosshairs for years. Now, in the midst of a production boom (despite moderate domestic demand), the industry has launched a lobbying assault on federal officials in the hopes of further boosting the payoff for large-scale fracking and drilling. And their efforts appear to be paying off.

It’s a policy decision with enormous consequences—one that is especially dangerous when made behind closed doors by an out-of-sight government agency in apparent consultation with industry lobbyists.

That’s why today Sightline Institute is joining with Earthjustice and Oil Change International to submit an official US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. We are asking the Obama administration to explain what it is doing and why—and to share with the public whether officials intend to loophole the existing ban to death or whether the secretive rulings apply only to niche light oils and particular refining processes.

Comments

Phil Church

February 10, 2015 at 2:34 pm

You think it would make sense with “peak oil” and all …. that we shouldn’t give exemptions to Big Oil that is produced within and transferred through out boundaries to be sold on the world markets to the highest bidders.

They take our resources, pollute our environment, avoid US taxes, grab exemptions that cost the taxpayer dearly …….. then sell their products to the highest bidder for profit world-wide. What’s in the “best interests” of our country for the long term and values like Patriotism .. aren’t in their vocabulary. They go and do whatever’s necessary to make a PROFIT and issues like ‘national interests’??? … only if it’ll keep them PROFITABLE.

I don’t care where Big Oil Corps call ‘home’ …. in reality .. they have NO COUNTRY, no sense of nationalism … it’s anything for a buck loyalty ….. Big Oil corp ‘personhoods’ don’t have a conscience, compassion, loyalty, etc. and our government .. should treat them accordingly.

Question: Instead of Keystone XL to Alberta tar sands, why not build pipeline from Oklahoma to Dakota Bakkan shale fields? This would significantly reduce the hazards of oil/gas shipment via rail through the Pacific Northwest and eastern states; reduce demand for off-shore drilling in the Gulf; dedicate more of these fuels for domestic purposes; existing pipeline and refining facilities get safety upgrades.

I can honestly no longer use the phrase, Question Internal Combustion, ever since plug-in hybrid technology evolved, the EV technology with the most potential to reduce overall fuel/energy consumption, more than all-battery EVs like the Tesla and Leaf, more than hydrogen fuel cell EV as well because clean ‘combustable’ hydrogen is storable for use in a hybrid drivetrain at a lower pressure. PHEVs create more economic incentives to drive less, whereby walking, bicycling and mass transit may become more viable means of travel. The powers that be wouldn’t plan a devastating disruption to our distribution systems of basic commodities, would they? Is globalization their plan for global starvation?

The sad reality is that only fossil fuels can provide for our current and growing energy demands regardless of continuing progress otherwise. As such a delicate balancing act should provide for transitions. I was taught 30 years ago that we would be effectively “out of oil” by this time and yet we currently find a glut, albeit a temporary one considering world-wide consumption levels. The oil “problem” is one which will ultimately take care of itself and the real question is whether our collective economies will manage to survive at all. The fact is, oil is really too complex and valuable a material to simply continue burning up as fuel.

Stay up to date on the Northwest's most important sustainability issues.

Research Areas

Founded in 1993, Sightline Institute is committed to making the Northwest a global model of sustainability, with strong communities, a green economy, and a healthy environment. We work to promote smart policy ideas and monitor the region's progress towards sustainability.