Comparison of Blood and Crystalloid Cardioplegia

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government.
Read our disclaimer for details.

The investigators decided to make a study with a cohort of patients as homogenous as possible with a cross clamp time around 70 min. Adult patients with a severe aortic stenoses without any other significant heart disease was included in our prospective randomised study. This group of patients was chosen for two reasons. First, these patients have left ventricular hypertrophy making the myocardium vulnerable to ischemia, secondly the investigators wanted to avoid the possible confounding effect of ischemia found in patients with variable degrees of coronary artery disease. Therefore, patients with additional significant coronary artery disease (≥ 50% stenoses) were excluded from the study.

Detailed Description

Objective: Myocardial protection during a cardiac arrest is mostly managed with cardioplegia. To day we normally used a blood or crystalloid based solutions. It has been published a lot of papers comparing the too groups with different results. To our knowledge no prospective, randomized study has compared modified St Thomas based Blood and Crystalloid cardioplegia on the acknowledged markers (CK-MB, troponin-T) of myocardial damage during aortic valve replacement on patients without additional significant coronary artery disease.

Methods: 100 patients with aorta stenoses undergoing aortic valve replacement without significant coronary artery stenoses or other significant concomitant heart valve disease were included in the study. They were given antegrade cold blood or cold crystalloid cardioplegia delivered through the coronary Ostia every 20 min throughout the period of aortic cross-clamp. CK-MB and troponin-T were compared between the two groups.

Study Type

Observational [Patient Registry]

Study Design

Observational Model: CohortTime Perspective: Prospective

Target Follow-Up Duration

4 Days

Biospecimen

Not Provided

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient material. Patients who are to undergo surgery for isolated severe aortic stenosis, without other heart disease will be included prospectively after informed consent. They will then be randomized to one of two types of cardioplegia same morning that they will be operated.

Condition

Aortic Stenosis

Myocardial Protection

Intervention

Not Provided

Study Groups/Cohorts

1 Blood cardioplegia

Blood cardioplegia

2 Crytalloid Cardioplegia

Crytalloid Cardioplegia

Publications *

Not Provided

* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications
identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.

From November 2006 to February 2009, 80 consecutive patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement at Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, volunteered to participate, and were included in the study. All patients gave their written consent. The local ethical committee approved the study protocol. Eligible for operation were patients with a mean aortic valve gradient > 50 mmHg or aortic valve area < 0.7 cm2 or symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Before induction of anesthesia, at the same day as the operation, patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups, either receiving cold (4-8°C) crystalloid or cold (4-8°C) blood cardioplegia. The randomisation was performed by opening of sealed envelopes and every cohort of ten patients was block-randomized (five crystalloid and five blood) to ensure an even distribution of the two cardioplegia regimen with time. Although cardioplegia is frequently given retrogradely through the coronary sinus, this procedure might give an inadequate protection of the right ventricle unless combined with antegrade administration of cardioplegia through the right coronary ostium. For the sake of simplicity, in the present study, cardioplegia was delivered antegradely only through the coronary ostia strictly every 20 min with a pressure of £ 300 mmHg with a Stöckert roller pump (Stöckert Instrumente GmbH, Munich, Germany), throughout the period of aortic cross-clamping. Initially, 400 ml of cardioplegia was administrated immediately following asystole. Every 20 min, 300-400 ml was administrated into the left coronary ostium and 200-300 ml into the right coronary ostium, taking the size of the heart into consideration. Patients with significant coronary artery stenoses (≥ 50%) or other significant concomitant heart valve disease were excluded from the study. Ten patients were also excluded from the study after randomisation (five patients in each group) for the following reasons: In the group receiving blood cardioplegia four patients were excluded because they needed additional cardioplegia (because of emergence of spontaneous heart rhythm after 10-12 min) before that scheduled by the protocol. One patient was excluded because the heart did not stop and the surgeon decided to open the aorta and administer cardioplegia directly into the coronary ostia. In the group receiving crystalloid cardioplegia two patients were excluded because they needed additional cardioplegia (because of emergence of spontaneous heart rhythm after 10-13 min) before that scheduled by the protocol. Two patients were excluded because the heart did not stop initially and the surgeon decided to open the aorta and administer cardioplegia directly into the coronary ostia. One patient was excluded because the second shot of cardioplegia was given 30 min after the first (and not 20 min as decided by the protocol).

Sex/Gender

Sexes Eligible for Study:

All

Ages

18 Years and older (Adult, Senior)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Contacts

Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects