You are here

rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

From the notwithstanding clause to the hot pink paper: weekly news roundup

Whiplash. The word our Books Editor used to characterize the news from Toronto this week. And what a week it was.

Here's how it went down. This Monday, Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice ruled that Bill 5 -- also known as the Better Local Government Act, introduced by the province and passed this summer in the legislature to reduce the number of Toronto City wards and councillors from 47 to 25 -- violated voters

Charter rights to freedom of expression.

Our politics reporter, Karl Nerenberg, writes that Justice Edward Belobaba based his ruling on the bill's timing -- the municipal election campaign period was already well underway, within the 47-ward framework, when Ford introduced the bill on June 30 -- and its impact on voters.

Under the 47-ward structure, Toronto's councillors represent about 60,000 people in each ward. Ford's legislation would result in one city councillor for every 110,000 Torontonians, which Justice Belobaba ruled would effectively undermine the right to "bring one's grievances and concerns to the attention of one's government representative."

Then, just hours after the ruling, Ford whipped up a press conference to announce his government would invoke Section 33 of the Charter, the notwithstanding clause, to revive the bill and press forward with its reapproval. The provincial legislature ultimately voted to re-approve the bill just a couple of days after the debacle.

David Climenhaga argues that no one should be surprised by Ford's use of the clause, which gives provincial governments the power to override certain portions of the Charter.

The so-called Better Local Government Act, which Ford and his backers claim is designed to save taxpayers millions and establish a more efficient government, simply puts "the premier's thumb on the municipal electoral scales in favour of conservative politicians," Climenhaga writes. In another piece, Climenhaga warns that we should expect more of the same: the era of notwithstanding clause restraint is officially over.

True to form, Ford continues to levy illogical, ad hominem attacks to defend his government's actions, claiming that as a democratically elected politician, his actions represent the people over judge-made law. (Of course, the extent to which Ford can be considered "democratically elected" under our first-past-the-post electoral system is up for debate.)

Looking forward, Toronto's municipal elections, still slated for October 22, are, understandably, a source of panic and speculation. Is Toronto's electoral democracy totally compromised? Toronto city clerk Ulli Watkiss has said that ensuring a fair election is now "virtually impossible."

With that in mind, don't forget to tune into rabble's coverage of the Toronto election, which kicked off this week with Phillip Dwight Morgan's interview with mayoral candidate Saron Gebresellassi.

And if all this news has you yearning for more philosophical ruminations on the meaning of and quest for democracy, read Doreen Nicoll's review of Astra Taylor's new documentary, What Is Democracy?

In other rabble news

Still celebrating the recent court overturn of the approval for the Trans Mountain pipeline? It's time for a more sober look at the facts. In her first article of a two-part series, Pamela Palmater outlines why the court decision actually paves the road for its eventual approval. "While Prime Minister Trudeau moans about how 'hurt' he is by the decision, and while the extractive industry goes into full panic mode, the only ones who need to be worried here are the Indigenous peoples and their conservation allies who will now face the full wrath of the oil industry and its federal and provincial cheerleaders," she writes.

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.