This article discusses Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na‘im's Islam and the Secular State from the perspective of Marsilius of Padua's political theory. Both authors share similar concepts of the relationship between religion, state policy, and the state, and allow for the integration of religious doctrines into state law. Nonetheless, the Marsilian conception provides stronger protection of unbelievers' and religious dissenters' civic rights. In the broader discourse on political theory of rights, Marsilius argues in favors of individual rights and a protection of minority rights, while an-Na‘im's theory of Shari‘a reform suggests a preference for a people's self-determination.

Dahl, Robert A.2000. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Dahl, Robert A.2006. On Political Equality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Dallmayr, Fred. 2008. “Comparative Political Theory: What is it Good for?” In Western Political Thought in Dialogue with Asia, eds. Shogimen, Takashi, and Nederman, Cary J.. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 13–24.

Hart, Henrik. 2000. “Religious Conflicts, Public Policy, and Moral Authority: Reflections on Christian Faith and Homosexual Rights in a Plural Society.” In Towards an Ethic of Community: Negotiations of Difference in a Pluralist Society, ed. Olthuis, James H.Waterloo: Canadian Corporation for Studies in Religion, 91–126.

Marsilius of Padua. 1993. Defensor minor and De translatione imperii (The “Minor Defender” and “On the Translation of the Empire”), ed. and trans. Nederman, Cary J.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.