And a bad movie review is far more fun for me to watch as a viewer, moviecritic1994!

Here are some titles:

Prophecy (1979)

Pinocchio In Outer Space (1965)

Such Good Friends (1971)

Multiple Razzie-Nominee Saturn 3 (1980)

A Circle of Two (1980)

The Yesterday Machine (1963)

Chained Heat (1983)

Plan 9 From Outer Space and EVERY SINGLE ED WOOD MOVIE EVER MADE!!!!!!

Special thanks to Son of Golden Turkey Awards by Harry And Michael Medved for these titles. I haven't finished reading it, but I'm loving it so far and recommend it highly to those who love reading about old bad movies.

SHAUN THE SHEEP and DRAGON BALL Z: RESURRECTION "F" have gotten early good reviews.RICKI & THE FLASHand THE GIFT don't look like obvious contenders. We should give a forum toFANTASTIC 4 2015 and maybe DARK PLACES.

Originally posted by GTAHater767

In circa '012, people might think I showed it a little too much mercy.

What happened in 2012?

Originally posted by moviecritic1994

Anyway, I haven't done a review on an old bad movie in a while. I believe my last was "Shanghai Surprise" quite sometime ago. Any recommendations you guys have?

Does it have to be a bad movie?

You might have noticed that I rarely start contender discussion threads more than a single day before the film opens. The same status quo shall apply here as well, because I don't know what to expect critics to say about Fant4stic, or if Dark Places will get enough negative reviews to underpass 30% approval rating.

Apparently, there was a spike in animosity towards Waterworld in 2012. I agree with you that it seemed like a random time for that to happen, but hopefully whoever brought up "a few years ago" might have better insight as to why.

I think the better question is, "does it have to be an old film?" because I have a list of 600 films, most of which got bad reviews from critics, a few of which are there on principle, and about 70 or 80 of which MovieCritic1994 has already reviewed. But they only date back as far as '000. I could probably throw together a list of the 50 or 60 worst films of the last century (19XX).

SHAUN THE SHEEP and DRAGON BALL Z: RESURRECTION "F" have gotten early good reviews.RICKI & THE FLASHand THE GIFT don't look like obvious contenders. We should give a forum toFANTASTIC 4 2015 and maybe DARK PLACES.

Originally posted by GTAHater767

In circa '012, people might think I showed it a little too much mercy.

What happened in 2012?

Originally posted by moviecritic1994

Anyway, I haven't done a review on an old bad movie in a while. I believe my last was "Shanghai Surprise" quite sometime ago. Any recommendations you guys have?

Does it have to be a bad movie?]]>
Sun, 02 Aug 2015 11:59:51 +0000http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7670&PID=65949#65949Movies in General... : Forum member reviewshttp://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5501&PID=65948#65948
Author: VitsSubject: Forum member reviewsPosted: August 02 2015 at 11:50am

The book at this point has no set release date yet, Hopefully it will be done sometime in December of 2015 if not a little earlier than that.

Anyway, I haven't done a review on an old bad movie in a while. I believe my last was "Shanghai Surprise" quite sometime ago. Any recommendations you guys have? ]]>
Sat, 01 Aug 2015 18:15:53 +0000http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7670&PID=65947#65947MEMBER DISCUSSIONS of RAZZ-able 2015 RELEASES : Members' Discussion of 2015 Movies in Generalhttp://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7670&PID=65946#65946
Author: GTAHater767Subject: Members' Discussion of 2015 Movies in GeneralPosted: August 01 2015 at 5:52pm

About the National Lampoon films: I named National Lampoon's Animal House #3 on the Retro Top 40 Movies of '978, the original Vacation #32 on the Retro Top 40 Movies of '983, and Christmas Vacation #40 on the latest draft of the Retro Top 40 Movies of '989. As I implied in my write-up for Vacation '015, Van Wilder, Van Wilder: The Rise of Taj, and Transylmania to my Bottom 40 Films of '002 (#33), '006 (#32), and '009 (#17) respectively. Vacation '015 would be the 4th film to land on my Bottom 40 list.

About the Troll remake. Hogwarts has a grading scale consisting of 6 rankings. Outstanding (90%+), Exceeds Expectations (80%-89%), Acceptable (70-79%), Poor (60-69%), Dreadful (1-59%), and Troll (0%). Troll 2 managed a 6% approval rating, just 1 positive review above a "Troll" on Hogwarts' scale. If this Troll remake gets even close to 0%, it could join our race, running on Troll 2's infamous reputation alone! Its main obstacle in our awards would be the status as an animated film.

About the Nosferatu remake. Few pieces of entertainment from upwards of 9 decades ago have as much influence today as Nosferatu. Though I couldn't find enough good motion pictures from that decade to make a complete list, I know that Nosferatu was the best motion picture of '922. There's a lot more at stake here. An animated Troll reboot is ruining the reputation of something that has nothing to lose and can't sink much lower. This last thing I say because I'm not familiar with Robert Eggers, but I doubt we could get anything close to the original, but I can still hold a ray of hope that it might succeed enough to revitalize its place in popular culture. But then again, a lot more is at stake.

About Waterworld. I personally would've voted for Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls for Worst Picture instead, but I admit Waterworld is kind of poor quality. In circa '012, people might think I showed it a little too much mercy.

About The Boy Next Door. kelemenmarc might have a point. Come to think of it, I don't think any individual performances from The Boy Next Door are worth a stand-alone nomination. I'll probably write in the entire cast for Worst Screen Combo instead.

To Vits: I'd recommend Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation because it's got the best reviews and the most widespread fame.

To oiram: I would sooner recommend these 6 films for Worst Picture over Serena and United Passions:

Leading Acting categories: I don't see how either Lawrence ("Serena") & Woodley ("Insurgent") can be on your list. I think they were both okay in okay films. They have big names for sure, and we would except more of them and their career choices, but I don't think that we should consider them because of their names as their performances were not Razzie-worthy. And I would really like to see separate nominations for the "Hot Pursuit" women and "The Human Centipede" boys. Also the thing is with the Leading Actress category is that it's incredibly weak. Like there are only a few real 'bad' performances in it.

Supporting Acting categories: I know I'm the only one but I actually liked Kristin Chenoweth in "The Boy Next Door". The only likable character which supposed to be annoying and campy, so I don't think that Chenoweth did a bad job. And I think even if people hate "Fifty Shades of Grey", they cannot nominate EVERYONE from the movie. Like Rita Ora had one line, and Marcia Gay Harden was on screen for a minute and did nothing Razzie-worthy. It would be ridiculous seeing them on the final list. And there is nothing Razzie-worthy in Kate Winslet's performance either.