As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Why do U.S. and European Christians always depict Jesus as a fair-skinned white man? He was most likely dark skinned (if he even existed).

I don’t think he would have had to be dark skinned, but he surely wasn’t blond with blue eyes. But maybe you should email Donald Trump and ask him to investigate this further. You know Donald is a terrific guy and very knowledgable when it comes to this kind of stuff.

Hey Darron, DM’s depiction of him wasn’t white. In fact it was a nice olive drab green.

Occam

So where did Jesus come up with those Caucasian children?

Signature

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

I see once again the level of intelligence being demonstrated by our atheist Christian attack dogs is at the licking their own nuts level.
Certainly I don’t have time to listen to schoolyard jerks put down humanity’s one and only spiritual avatar who made forgiveness of sins
the cornerstone of God’s Cosmic Plan. Forgiveness of sins is the only way that human beings stop the otherwise operative vicious circle of vengeance
that keeps the world at war. You attack the wrong Christianity instead of supporting the right one, the Gnostic Christian tradition which has now in its modern form has produced the Gospel of Humanity which brings Christianity into full compliance with humanitarianism, the essence of any humanistic ideology. Please stop acting like
children re Christianity which you don’t know at all as you target the dying end of Pauline Christianity.

I see once again the level of intelligence being demonstrated by our atheist Christian attack dogs is at the licking their own nuts level.
Certainly I don’t have time to listen to schoolyard jerks put down humanity’s one and only spiritual avatar who made forgiveness of sins
the cornerstone of God’s Cosmic Plan. Forgiveness of sins is the only way that human beings stop the otherwise operative vicious circle of vengeance
that keeps the world at war. You attack the wrong Christianity instead of supporting the right one, the Gnostic Christian tradition which has now in its modern form has produced the Gospel of Humanity which brings Christianity into full compliance with humanitarianism, the essence of any humanistic ideology. Please stop acting like
children re Christianity which you don’t know at all as you target the dying end of Pauline Christianity.

If you have a religion that you think has the essence of any humanistic ideology, then perhaps it is a kind of progress. Perhaps we have some common ground. But you must realize that to non-believers, the pot of religious stew is spoiled. All will tend to be viewed as the next coming of a mythology that has all of the deficiencies as all other purported true religions. Yours appears to have many of the same deficiencies: e.g., a self proclaimed prophet, evidence based on subjective “spiritual” experiences and some loosely argued ravings about the evidence somehow supplied by all of the history of human civilization, and ultimately requiring belief based on simply deciding to believe in the deity of (in this case) Jesus.

Your case simply seems silly to most of the responders on this forum. Silliness sometimes begets silliness.

As it is clear to me that you are not about to abandon your obsessive quest with your modernized version of an old religion, I would say carry on. If it truly is humanistic in its ideology, then that is something, and is less deserving of criticism than some of the other religions that are rooted in human society. But you shouldn’t expect that it will taken seriously by skeptics and atheists.

Signature

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Slandering Jesus who loves children? Is that the best you can scrap off the bottom of your barrel of brain dead monkeys?

You should not blaspheme Dead Monky. He may be a descendant of the original Aquarian Man or He may even be the Supreme Deity Himself. We just don’t know.

I am an Aquarian and I speak from Authority!!!!!......

I am a Taurean and I call B.S. (but I do enjoy your fluidic style).

Signature

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.