Not so many years ago, the fashion industry was called a ‘sunset industry’, and
was deemed to have no future in the most developed countries. But recently,
the New York Times has suggested that ‘the sun never sets on the runway’
(Wilson, 2008). Under this heading the article described the diffusion of fashion
week organizations, with accompanying fashion shows, that are no longer
limited to a handful of fashion capitals, but are spreading to small-country
capitals and medium-sized cities all around the world.

During the Copenhagen Fashion Week A/W 2010, CPH Kids opened as the first
independent trade fair for children’s clothing. Despite considerable resistance, the fair
managed to establish itself and challenge the established order by providing a venue
devoted fully to children’s clothing and luring away exhibitors and visitors looking for
change. In this paper, we analyze the dynamic development and distinctive traits of the
children’s clothing sector symbolized at the new fair. Our study contributes to inquiry
into the role of fairs and festivals in the creative industries by examining the special case of
coinciding, competing trade fairs. We introduce and build on three closely related, but in
our view complementary, concepts applied and developed in analyses of festivals, trade
shows and other kinds of temporary, usually competitive events, namely tournament
rituals, field configuring events and tournaments of value. We establish the common
ground of the three approaches, particular their assertion of the rich research potential and
vital significance of festivals, fairs and similar events for many fields, whether deemed
creative or not. We also single out particular strengths of each approach, which inform our
inquiry. They review of theory, points to how existing work has explored fairs as arenas of
conflict between exhibitors as well as the rivalry between events separated in time and/or
place. In our case, we demonstrate how the emergence of a rival fair both incites and
exposes division or segmentation of a field. This observation in our view, challenges
prevailing understandings of the relationship between fields and the events, we assume
represent and shape them. We argue that it is more complicated than extant theory
suggests, and this has implications for the analysis of the fairs and to their role in
configuring field. We raise questions about the precise manner in and extent to which
events configure field, and point to the agency of event organizers, the fair context and the
fair as medium as factors that need to be factored in.
The reflections on the field configuring capacity of fairs and similar event, inform our
explorations of Danish childrenswear. Following the tournament of value-approach, we
place values – more specifically how different values are affirmed and negotiated at the
fairs – at the center of our analysis. The approach suggests, that symbolic value, and
ultimately the (economic) value exchange value, of cultural products are established
through judgments of their technical/material, social, situational, appreciative and utility
values. However, we do not focus as much on specific evaluative practices in the field, as
the cultural values and norms around which childhood is constructed. These values are
vital for the field of children’s clothing, so we address contemporary concerns about
childhood placing a particular emphasis on the Nordic context with its the notion of “the
competent child”. While our analysis only offers only selected snapshots of the many
activities at the two fairs, we have pointed to some of the ways in which positions are
staked, values are addressed, forms of capital built and exchanged, and different field
configuring mechanisms operate. We conclude, that while further research is required to
gauge the field configuring impact of CPH Kids and explore the values, identities and
structures of Danish children’s fashion in more depth, our investigation points to the field
dividing impact that fairs might have.