More gf's are won by teams that have exp. Is very hard to win a gf with limited if not no exp at all. The old saying you have to lose a gf before you win one. Maybe not so much these days as before due to all the players changing more frequently than the past 50 years. But until it changes ill stick with numbers that favour me. In saying all of that it will be a great game!!! From a betting view the jets are the best for the day for me.

More gf's are won by teams that have exp. Is very hard to win a gf with limited if not no exp at all. The old saying you have to lose a gf before you win one. Maybe not so much these days as before due to all the players changing more frequently than the past 50 years. But until it changes ill stick with numbers that favour me. In saying all of that it will be a great game!!! From a betting view the jets are the best for the day for me.

In 04 the Dogs were playing in there first GF (that group of players) against a Roosters team that had played in the previous 2 GF's.....

In 04 the Dogs were playing in there first GF (that group of players) against a Roosters team that had played in the previous 2 GF's.....

Who won?

Dogs were an awesome team 2001-2004 and they were bound to win a GF in that time, they'd finished in the top 5 in each of those years and were littered with class. This years team has come out of nowhere and have a rag tag halves pairing. They would have also won the comp in 2002 had they not had their points stripped for breach issues...