écrit à dessein et en connaissance de cause

please, update as soon as possible

Here is a brief essay on design by Darwin’s contemporary John Stuart Mill. Question: are the molecular machines identified by Michael Behe as decisive evidence for design merely analogous to human-built machines or do they fully instantiate the concept of machine?

What is the meaning of this post? That Michael Behe have just a century of science to catch up?

Please, could you push the update button(s)? 🙂

WordPress:

J'aimechargement…

Sur le même thème

2 Réponses

Why do you even have this blog?
Your silly comment doesn’t even make sense.
If that’s honestly how you interpret the quote, then you’re not apt to be making such conclusive comments on ID (or ‘silly’ design as you so cleverly call it).

In Darwin’s day they had nowhere near the technology that we do for increasing our understanding of the level of complexity at a molecular scale. But, with their modest knowledge and intuitive reasoning some of his contemporaries did think that the machines analogy was correct.
The post is saying that Behe has provided empirical support for this initial assumption.

How you are unable to understand this eludes me. You might want to consider reading Behe’s actual work…. that way, you might be able to develop a critique that isn’t as flimsy as the majority of other tid-bits you have put on this blog.