Consumer TechConsumer technology is going to exist indefinitely, perhaps for as long as the human species exists. At CleanTechnica, we try to feature consumer technologies that help to reduce global warming pollution and other types of pollution. For example: electric cars, solar panels, bikes, energy efficient appliances and electronics, and green smartphone apps. Keep an eye on this category for all sorts of fun and cool, helpful consumer technology.

New Study Lifts the Curtain on Clean Coal

A new study from West Virginia University exposes one more dirty little secret about America’s favorite fossil fuel, coal. Though coal mining is touted as an economic boon to local communities, the study reviews mortality statistics to conclude that coal mining communities in Appalachia are among the weakest economies in their home states, and in the country. The study, “Mortality in Appalachian Coal Mining Regions,” appears in the July-August issue of Public Health Reports, the official journal of the U.S. Public Health Services.

[social_buttons]

Mountaintop Removal and Clean Coal

The promotion of “clean coal” as a sustainable fuel hearkens back to the days when cigarette smoking was promoted as a healthy habit. Sure, you get a kick, but there’s a cost. Regardless of any new technology for burning coal or converting it to other fuels, coal comes from the ground. The worst damage is done by the relatively new phenomenon of mountaintop removal – literally blowing up mountains to reach coal seams close to the surface. It’s a cheaper method than underground mining, but as the environmental equivalent of lung cancer, mountaintop removal has leveled hundred of pristine mountains and obliterated hundreds of miles of streams in one of America’s richest ecosystems, the Appalachian region.

Coal Ash Dumps and Clean Coal

Given the devastating effects of mountaintop removal, clearly the “clean” in clean coal refers only to emissions from coal fired power plants, not to coal extraction methods. That’s quite a narrow definition, especially when you factor in the impact of coal ash disposal. Ash is the stuff left over from burning coal. With about 50% of the electricity in the U.S. currently generated by coal, that adds up to a lot of ash. The disposal method of choice is to quarantine the ash in open reservoirs. It was barely a year ago that the dam on one such reservoir failed, spilling 5 million cubic yards of coal ash into a Tennessee community. The U.S. EPA responded by proposing new regulations for coal ash dumps. That’s hardly a comfort to communities that host hundreds of ash dumps in the U.S., especially the 44 coal ash dumps that the EPA lists as “potentially high hazard” due to the risk of human fatalities from a dam failure.

The Impact of Coal Mining on Local Economies

As revealed by the new West Virginia University study, the “clean” in clean coal pulls an even more impressive disappearing act when it comes to the benefits of coal on the communities that are home to mining operations. Charleston Gazette writer Ken Ward Jr., whose previous work includes an article on the health effects of coal mining operations, covered the release of “Mortality in Appalachian Coal Mining” and has made a pdf of the study available through his blog, Coal Tattoo. The authors are Michael Hendryx, associate director of the WVU Institute for Health Policy Research with co-author Melissa Ahern of Washington State University. As Ward notes, the authors determined that the coal industry contributes about $8 billion annually to the Appalachian economy, but under their analysis the economic losses attributable to premature deaths associated with coal operations are in the range of $42 billion.

The Hidden Costs of Clean Coal

The authors of the study emphasize that their estimate is conservative, based primarily on the well documented connection between early mortality and economic health. Ward’s blog cites additional factors that were not part of the study, which make the economic picture even gloomier: the effect of poor health on worker productivity, the increase in public aid for foods stamps and Medicaid, and the economic consequences of natural resource destruction. This last item is particularly relevant to mountaintop removal, which is a highly mechanized process linked with job loss, not job creation. Appalachia lost more than half of its coal mining jobs in the 20 years following 1985, when mountaintop mining came into its own. On top of that, the destruction of pristine, tourist-friendly areas near the famous Appalachian Trail closes at least one door to alternative employment opportunities that could help improve community health.

Whither Clean Coal?

Local opposition to mountaintop mining is just one indication that the “clean coal” moniker isn’t pulling the wool over anyone’s eyes. Another is the increasing number of canceled coal fired power plants. The Sierra Club just marked the 100th cancellation of a planned coal fired power plant in the U.S., a trend that goes beyond green-leaning states like California. Wyoming and Kansas are among the states recently canceling coal plants, and in Illinois a coal-to-liquid plant got the heave-ho. Coal is running out of places to go in the U.S., regardless of its cleanliness — or lack thereof.

About the Author

Tina Casey Tina Casey specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.

This group is created with the aim to simplify and expedite the business transactions of coal, both for brokers, investors, owners, financiers, buyers, miners, traders and sellers. Build a network of the world’s coal business. Includes all the interests of investors. Interests include all broker. Includes all the interests of funders. Cover all the interest traders. Includes all the interests of buyers. Cover all the interest the seller. Includes all the interests of miners. Includes all the interests of all parties to achieve a successful transaction in the coal business. So with the interest groups of all parties involved can work together for a successful transaction more effective and efficient. Prioritize the business strategy of innovation and the world then all the effort and seriousness you will achieve strong results. Be a reliable business because of it all is the key to success to make decisions quickly and accurately to promote and increase the maximum results for your business.

The coal industry benefits from numerous subsidies and tax breaks. They have billboards along West Virginia Highways touting “clean coal”. Well guys, let’s see you deliver!

It’s time to change the economic and political paradigm of energy supply and take back control of our energy future. The UT Supreme Court is on target.

A level economic playing field will be created when ALL energy production and conversion facilities to use reasonably available modern technologies. If “clean coal” isn’t available, then the coal industry and their lackeys should “tear down those signs”. Without a level playing field the USA will never achieve sustainable power supply, and have the potential to create new USA jobs.

To succeed, we must require coal-fired power plants – America’s largest single source of global warming pollution – and other big smokestack industries to stop polluting with reckless impunity.

Ed Swanson

The coal industry benefits from numerous subsidies and tax breaks. They have billboards along West Virginia Highways touting “clean coal”. Well guys, let’s see you deliver!

It’s time to change the economic and political paradigm of energy supply and take back control of our energy future. The UT Supreme Court is on target.

A level economic playing field will be created when ALL energy production and conversion facilities to use reasonably available modern technologies. If “clean coal” isn’t available, then the coal industry and their lackeys should “tear down those signs”. Without a level playing field the USA will never achieve sustainable power supply, and have the potential to create new USA jobs.

To succeed, we must require coal-fired power plants – America’s largest single source of global warming pollution – and other big smokestack industries to stop polluting with reckless impunity.

So what are your thoughts on conversion of coal to natural gas in-situ through naturally occurring bacteria and archaea?

Coal is never clean – every element is captured within its matrix. It’s actually pretty much impossible to find a definitive chemical structure for it and it adsorbs everything. Natural gas is pretty easy actually – CH4.

These microbes have been crucial to the historical carbon cycle throughout’s earth’s history. In fact, most new studies of ancient ocena rock put the arrival of oxygen in our atmosphere to a lack of nickel in the ocean 2.7 billion years ago. This lack of nickel lowered the rates of methanogenesis in the ocean and as a result methane levels dropped. This drop in methane allowed oxygen to come to its current levels since it would no longer oxidize the methane into CO2.

I don’t mean to start a polarized discussion. I believe that it is just simply impossible for one person to know all sides on any one issue. And i wish to understand what the best way forward would actually entail and whether that proposed way is actually feasible. If no carbon, what is the feasible way?

intricatenick

So what are your thoughts on conversion of coal to natural gas in-situ through naturally occurring bacteria and archaea?

Coal is never clean – every element is captured within its matrix. It’s actually pretty much impossible to find a definitive chemical structure for it and it adsorbs everything. Natural gas is pretty easy actually – CH4.

These microbes have been crucial to the historical carbon cycle throughout’s earth’s history. In fact, most new studies of ancient ocena rock put the arrival of oxygen in our atmosphere to a lack of nickel in the ocean 2.7 billion years ago. This lack of nickel lowered the rates of methanogenesis in the ocean and as a result methane levels dropped. This drop in methane allowed oxygen to come to its current levels since it would no longer oxidize the methane into CO2.

I don’t mean to start a polarized discussion. I believe that it is just simply impossible for one person to know all sides on any one issue. And i wish to understand what the best way forward would actually entail and whether that proposed way is actually feasible. If no carbon, what is the feasible way?

Watcher

The Impact of Coal Mining on Local Economies………..I wonder what effect the use of tobacco has on these numbers as we all know it’s use is quiet substantial in So. W V . It seems some of coal’s biggest detractors continue to light up all the while complaining about “clean air”.

Watcher

The Impact of Coal Mining on Local Economies………..I wonder what effect the use of tobacco has on these numbers as we all know it’s use is quiet substantial in So. W V . It seems some of coal’s biggest detractors continue to light up all the while complaining about “clean air”.

Wind Energy

Search the IM Network

The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by, and do not necessarily represent the views of Sustainable Enterprises Media, Inc., its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.