Authors

Senior Lecturer in Ecology, Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Deakin University

Disclosure statement

Chris Dickman receives funding from the Australian Research Council and the Long Term Ecological Research Network (although none of the funding received is relevant to the current article).

Euan Ritchie and Thomas Newsome do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

At 5,531 km, the dingo barrier fence stretches from eastern Queensland all the way to the South Australian coastline. The fence was erected in the late 1800s and early 1900s to protect cropland from rabbits. It was later modified to protect livestock, particularly sheep, from dingoes.

But there is increasing debate in the scientific community on whether the dingo fence is damaging the environment.

There is a simple solution, as we argue in a paper published today in the journal Restoration Ecology: move a small section of the dingo fence to test whether the dingo can help restore our degraded rangelands.

Dingoes are absent, or found in very low numbers, across much of central and western NSW, as well as parts of South Australia. There are also fences in Western Australia to exclude dingoes from the south-western corner of the state.

The dingo debate

One argument is that dingoes can keep in check smaller predators such as invasive red foxes and feral cats, in turn benefiting native species by reducing overall predation pressure upon them.

Dingoes may also control feral goats, as well as native herbivores such as kangaroos and emus, that together contribute to overgrazing when present in large numbers.

These are critical interactions to consider, because Australia holds another world record: the highest extinction rate for mammals over the last 200 years, with the loss of 29 endemic species. Predation by red foxes and feral cats are a common factor in many of these extinctions.

A model for how dingoes interact with other animals. If dingoes control kangaroo and emu numbers, there may be more grass. If dingoes control foxes and cats, there may be more small mammals, reptiles and birds. However all of these interactions may be influenced by rainfall and fire (as indicated by the dotted arrows).

In our new paper we argue that we can resolve the debate by moving the dingo fence around Sturt National Park in western NSW, on the border with Queensland and South Australia. The park is currently on the inner side of the fence, where dingoes are uncommon. Our proposal would put it on the outside, where dingoes are more common.

Western NSW is greatly degraded and suffers from eroded soils, impoverished native vegetation communities and unprecedented levels of extinction of native mammals and other vertebrates. So reintroducing dingoes could help start restoring these damaged lands.

There is reason to hope that they will thanks to studies on grey wolves in the United States.

Grey wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park and Idaho in 1995/96 after a 70 year absence. This provided scientists with an opportunity to explore what happens when a top-predator returns. The research has been integral in cementing the ecological theory known as a “trophic cascade”.

Studies are now being conducted outside of Yellowstone in more settled areas, including Washington State.

Moving the fence

We argue that a reintroduction study is possible to conduct under current legislation.

To undertake the study we estimate that 275 km of new dingo-proof fencing would be required. Monitoring costs would be in the order of A$1 million per year, which is about 10% of what is spent maintaining the dingo fence each year.

Such expenditure is not unprecedented for large-scale environmental projects in Australia. For example, the Australian Government recently provided A$19 million to reduce the detrimental impact of feral camels in central Australia, while A$35 million has been spent on the red fox eradication program in Tasmania.

The major prerequisite for the experiment to proceed would be convincing local communities to support the effort. That support would likely help to sway government policy, and garnering this support would require effective community engagement and extension.

A drone image of a breeding colony of Greater Crested Terns. Researchers used plastic bird decoys to replicate this species in an experiment that compared different ways of counting wildlife.
Jarrod Hodgson