Ill bet you think "white privledge" means our white brainz beez rayyycissss because they beez unfairly smarter and thus deserve to test with an affirmative action Negri iq test witch consists of a intricate and difficult peg and hole box witch coincidentally is the same test niglets use to test to become brain surgeons at obama university!!

Intelligence cannot be defined thus we cannot know if there are differences in intelligence between the races! So goes the claim of the social justice warrior hypocrites.

Just ignore these communist scumbags, they are completely clueless and irrational.

Bare in mind, intelligence is subjective. There is tests that can be used to try and determine one's intelligence (e.g IQ) but the definition is very broad and is used in many different ways.

When it comes to intelligence and races, scientific studies have shown that there is a clear distinction between intelligence and races. Lefties and their type can try and ignore this as much as they want but it doesn't stop the reality that the differences do exist (as you can expect anyways from these people who are not the brightest bulbs in the box they will just ignore anything that doesn't fit in with their ridiculous outlook of the world that denies natural laws) and that is all that matters.

Quote:

Well, fine! Let's put then your kids in a class of students with an IQ of 80 and mine in a class with an IQ of 120.

Then there will be obvious differences but this is not solely based on IQ racial differences but intellectual differences among all peoples. You will find White people with 80 and 120 IQ's.

Quote:

You should be OK with it because "Intelligence cannot be defined!".

Intelligence can be defined subjectively broadly but not objectively.

Even if we had a complete White society there would still be a hierarchy in education for the intellectual differences between people. No two people are the same.

Hitler expresses this quite well in MK:

Quote:

It would be absurd to appraise a man’s worth by the race to which he belongs and at the same time to make war against the Marxist principle, that all men are equal, without being determined to pursue our own principle to its ultimate consequences. If we admit the significance of blood, that is to say, if we recognize the race as the fundamental element on which all life is based, we shall have to apply to the individual the logical consequences of this principle. In general I must estimate the worth of nations differently, on the basis of the different races from which they spring, and I must also differentiate in estimating the worth of the individual within his own race. The principle, that one people is not the same as another, applies also to the individual members of a national community. No one brain, for instance, is equal to another; because the constituent elements belonging to the same blood vary in a thousand subtle details, though they are fundamentally of the same quality.

The first consequence of this fact is comparatively simple. It demands that those elements within the folk-community which show the best racial qualities ought to be encouraged more than the others and especially they should be encouraged to increase and multiply.

This task is comparatively simple because it can be recognized and carried out almost mechanically. It is much more difficult to select from among a whole multitude of people all those who actually possess the highest intellectual and spiritual characteristics and assign them to that sphere of influence which not only corresponds to their outstanding talents but in which their activities will above all things be of benefit to the nation. This selection according to capacity and efficiency cannot be effected in a mechanical way. It is a work which can be accomplished only through the permanent struggle of everyday life itself.

A Weltanschhauung which repudiates the democratic principle of the rule of the masses and aims at giving this world to the best people – that is, to the highest quality of mankind – must also apply that same aristocratic postulate to the individuals within the folk-community. It must take care that the positions of leadership and highest influence are given to the best men. Hence it is not based on the idea of the majority, but on that of personality.

Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter IV Personality and the ideal of the people's state

Bare in mind, intelligence is subjective. There is tests that can be used to try and determine one's intelligence (e.g IQ) but the definition is very broad and is used in many different ways.

Man, you are beating around the bush just like the egalitarian crowd. It either can be defined or it cannot be defined. There is no "it can be defined a little bit".

I say it can be defined and everybody who says otherwise is a dishonest hypocrite and need to take the challenge of my original post or shut up. But nobody's gonna take that challenge because they know that a class of students with an IQ of 80 will always be way less smart than a class of 120.

Quote:

Then there will be obvious differences but this is not solely based on IQ racial differences but intellectual differences among all peoples. You will find White people with 80 and 120 IQ's.

I know that. I didn't say a class of African Americans. Before you wanna talk about race and intelligence you have to define intelligence. Which you said is subjective thus cannot be defined. Then why are you talking about race and intelligence when you don't even know what intelligence is?

You are contradicting yourself and probably you are just a troll with your 14 posts and your Hitler avatar.

Man, you are beating around the bush just like the egalitarian crowd. It either can be defined or it cannot be defined. There is no "it can be defined a little bit".

It cannot be defined objectively. Why do you think there is so many variants of it, there is not a one-way definition of "intelligence".

I get it, you are one of them, anyone who disagrees with you is "insert here".

Quote:

I say it can be defined and everybody who says otherwise is a dishonest hypocrite and need to take the challenge of my original post or shut up. But nobody's gonna take that challenge because they know that a class of students with an IQ of 80 will always be way less smart than a class of 120.

So because YOU say it can be defined that means it can be? And so anyone who disagrees with you equates to you having to personally attack them?

And no, not necessarily.

Quote:

I know that. I didn't say a class of African Americans. Before you wanna talk about race and intelligence you have to define intelligence. Which you said is subjective thus cannot be defined. Then why are you talking about race and intelligence when you don't even know what intelligence is?

I said that an exclusive definition of intelligence does not exist and that it can be defined in many different ways. However, the standard definition of it (e.g IQ tests) shows that there is a significant difference when it comes to intelligence and races.

Quote:

You are contradicting yourself and probably you are just a troll with your 14 posts and your Hitler avatar.

I'm not contradicting myself, you just don't seem to comprehend what I mean...

Enough with the immature personal attacks too, it really doesn't back up your argument anymore, on the contrary, it makes you look like someone who has an argument that does not hold water and whenever one challenges it you seem to get defensive, I wonder why that is...

And judging from some of the responses you are already hearing in this thread you started, I think you are seeing the scope of the problem: Liberals tell so many lies so often that even some of our own members have fallen for those lies in many subjects, mistaking them for truth because they have heard them all their lives. (And I have been there myself, so it's pretty easy for me to understand how they can fall for it.)

__________________

__________________

Ours is the race that invented essentially everything. Have faith that we will get through this time. Keep fighting, but have faith.