This is a response to Bert Bos' review [1] of the Widgets 1.0
Requirements document [2].
> COMMENT 8) Ad "manifest": I was expecting the word "metadata" in this
> paragraph. (Not strictly necessary, just a way to confirm to the reader
> that that is indeed what the definition talks about.)
The text of section 3.2 has been updated to include the word
"metadata". It now reads: "The manifest language would generally allow
authors to declare metadata and other properties related to their
widget, as well as provide a means to automatically instantiate the
widget"
--
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2007Feb/0131.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-widgets-reqs-20070209/