While I don't question the data, I find the interpretation over-complicated and laughably wrong. Really, they should make you take an IQ test before granting academic titles.

I think this is more of a social then a biological issue. Working class people are more afraid of societal change because they are aware that their skills are pretty easy to learn, hence "cheap". This makes them highly replaceable in the workforce. So, if something changes in society (like masses of migrants flooding their country) they run a much higher risk of being displaced from their jobs by the new order of things (then doctors or engineers e.g.). Just think that in case of military drafts the highly specialized generally continue to practice their trade while the workers are sent to the front.
Working class people are generally stronger.

Or it might be because people who are physically inclined tend to be more ignorant and think less (I've been to the gym enough times to safely say this). People are afraid of what they don't know and it takes some intellectual work to understand something new.

Since we're basing "truths" on our personal highschool experience, I'd say that the "outdoorsy types" (with the exception of gear heads and nature enthusiasts) are also a hell of a lot dumber.

I think this is more of a social then a biological issue. Working class people are more afraid of societal change because they are aware that their skills are pretty easy to learn, hence "cheap". This makes them highly replaceable in the workforce. So, if something changes in society (like masses of migrants flooding their country) they run a much higher risk of being displaced from their jobs by the new order of things (then doctors or engineers e.g.). Just think that in case of military drafts the highly specialized generally continue to practice their trade while the workers are sent to the front.
Working class people are generally stronger.

Then why would the strongest movie stars (Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone and Chuck Norris, etc.) also tend towards conservatism? What are they afraid of?

The explanation for this is really very simple: testosterone makes you right-wing.

Then why would the strongest movie stars (Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone and Chuck Norris, etc.) also tend towards conservatism? What are they afraid of?

The explanation for this is really very simple: testosterone makes you right-wing.

Occam’s Razor dude.

That is what I believe as well. I believe Testosterone makes you more likely to hold TRADITIONALLY masculine views that I believe are grounded more in human reality vs the utopian pipe dreams that are not grounded in reality at all. Masculine men have more testosterone, it is only naturally that would tend on average be physically stronger and more "conservative". When we are talking about right-wing in this instance, what we are really talking about is less supportive of radical feminism as a tool of Marxism, less support for radical Marxist ideas like gender neutrality, pro LGBT perversion and undermining of the traditional order via P.C. , less support for an all intrusive nanny state etc. Basically less support for all things that are fundamentally anti-paternal that undermine the traditional structure of Western civilization and the family unit. Testosterone is not everything, but it is a key piece of the puzzle. The Marxists understand this as well or they would not be waging such a hard fought war against everything masculine and traditional. Masculinity is decidedly evil in their worldview, because they know it correlates to everything they hate and is a stumbling block to one world mommy professor rule.

Oy! Yesterday a big guy pushed me in the subway and I fell and hurt my arm. I had a flashback to grade school when all the kids kept me in the center during dodge ball the whole recess. I'm voting for a Democrat.