<quoted text>You forgot already?Procreation is not a requirement for a marriage licenseMating behavior is not stipulated for a marriage licenseThere are no legal marriage contracts in the animal kingdom as they are not natural, but legal contracts.Tell you what, every time you post I will be glad to remind you

I'm sorry, the issue was the basic essence of marriage. As I noted before, mating behavior is the primary driver. Legal issues followed much later, primarily to protect mothers and children.

You can dumb down your relationship to a contract, but don't insult intelligent people by calling it marriage.

<quoted text>Why don't you grow up and realize that it's NONE OF YOUR FREAKING BUSINESS what two people do in the privacy of their own home, as long as what they do occurs between CONSENTING ADULTS and doesn't break any laws.If you don't want to dip your dick in someone's behind, then DON'T DO IT! Millions of straight and gay people do it every day. It's their lives.Stop being a child. Or maybe you're actually still a child and posting on an adult website.Either way, get over it.

Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning. It is why it is considered illegal in many countries, and was here until recently.

That medical fact has not changed, and is a major part of how AIDS originated in our country and spread. THAT IS STILL COSTING ALL OF US IN MANY WAYS.

<quoted text>I'm sorry, the issue was the basic essence of marriage. As I noted before, mating behavior is the primary driver. Legal issues followed much later, primarily to protect mothers and children.You can dumb down your relationship to a contract, but don't insult intelligent people by calling it marriage.

The "basic essence of marriage" is a human legal matter, not a natural matter.

There are no legal "marriages” in the animal kingdom outside of human governmental law.

You are free to call your grotesque marriage whatever you want to, but you will not be defining mine or anyone else’s.

There is no requirement of intent or ability for procreation for a marriage license, we marry couples all the time and have for hundreds of years that cannot have children. Your belittling those people is not helping your case in any way at all, you are only driving more people to our side of equality and freedom.

<quoted text>You do realize that you've stepped into it big time?Your kind has all the makings of a Religion, with deeply mysterious acts, mindless slogans, childish screams of "no-believer!!!!" and need for Government protection.

Me?

You talking about eradicating people.

That sword can cut both ways

I just enjoy putting peoples comments into perspective by turning their opinions onto themselves.

Or better, Imagine one of those gaudy felt paintings of Jesus at the rock with a speech bubble over his head saying “Wee need to grow a spine and eradicate these people!”

Yeah that kind of puts it in its proper perspective, I don’t assume for one moment that a single” actual Christian” has ever posted in this forum. Just a bunch of people that use that religion as justification for their bigotry and their desire for power over others.

<quoted text>You do realize that you've stepped into it big time?Your kind has all the makings of a Religion, with deeply mysterious acts, mindless slogans, childish screams of "no-believer!!!!" and need for Government protection.

<quoted text>The "basic essence of marriage" is a human legal matter, not a natural matter.There are no legal "marriages” in the animal kingdom outside of human governmental law.You are free to call your grotesque marriage whatever you want to, but you will not be defining mine or anyone else’s.There is no requirement of intent or ability for procreation for a marriage license, we marry couples all the time and have for hundreds of years that cannot have children. Your belittling those people is not helping your case in any way at all, you are only driving more people to our side of equality and freedom.

If there needed to be a 'requirement', we wouldn't need birth control would we?

<quoted text>Me?You talking about eradicating people.That sword can cut both waysI just enjoy putting peoples comments into perspective by turning their opinions onto themselves.Or better, Imagine one of those gaudy felt paintings of Jesus at the rock with a speech bubble over his head saying “Wee need to grow a spine and eradicate these people!”Yeah that kind of puts it in its proper perspective, I don’t assume for one moment that a single” actual Christian” has ever posted in this forum. Just a bunch of people that use that religion as justification for their bigotry and their desire for power over others.

Have any single one of you ever opened your birth canal and spoke up against the Caligulas?

No, quite the contrary. You've defended them.

And now you're going to spray urine because you've discovered you're as wanted as any other disease carrying vermin?

<quoted text>The "basic essence of marriage" is a human legal matter, not a natural matter.There are no legal "marriages” in the animal kingdom outside of human governmental law.You are free to call your grotesque marriage whatever you want to, but you will not be defining mine or anyone else’s.There is no requirement of intent or ability for procreation for a marriage license, we marry couples all the time and have for hundreds of years that cannot have children. Your belittling those people is not helping your case in any way at all, you are only driving more people to our side of equality and freedom.

1. Marriage proceeded any legal aspects, and still does in many countries. Laws simply regulated what was already motivated by mating behavior. Hence, the basic essence,'roots' of marriage is mating behavior.

2. I never said nature motivated marriage, I said marriage is a cross CULTURAL constraint on mating behavior. HUMANS, not animals.

However, there is life-long mating behavior among animals, marriage WITHOUT the law.

<quoted text>This has to be the post of the month! And this coming from a social "scientist" no less.

And... What was his excuse? "He just got tired of hearing aboput the kids..." Man, he hasn't gotten to adopt one yet, and he's already tired of them. Wait until he has to get up at 3AM and change a diaper, then what? He'll REALLY be tired of them then, and they won't matter then ... It'll be like that movie, "Flowers in the attic" ...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flowers_in_the_A...

<quoted text>Oh, I see, we're back to your obsession of anal sex. Wow, you must be tired today to trot out this tired piece of nonsense so early in the day.1) They had to deny no such thing bitchy. You see, unlike you, they are aware that homosexuality isn't an act, its a characteristic. You see moron, one can be gay and never have anal sex. In fact, most gays don't have anal sex. Anal sex has NOTHING to do with homosexuality. It has to do with sexuality period. It is an act that is performed by both homosexuals and heterosexuals.2) You can present NOTHING that supports your statement about it being unhealthy. There is nothing inherently unhealthy about anal sex. The fact that you are obsessed over it is irrelevant.3) Medical professionals would never dream of labeling something "demeaning". That is a judgment, and judgments are not the concern of the medical community.Your tired and worn out sentence above has absolutely not a lick of truth to it. Yet you trot it out over and over and over. know why? Cause you got NOTHING, you never will.But don't let facts get in the way of you constantly wanting to pretend that anal sex is solely a homosexual thing. Nothing funnier than watching you display your lack of intelligence so proudly.<quoted text>What does your fascination with your imaginary sterility has absolutely nothing to do with the normalcy of homosexuality. We aren't sterile individuals you stupid cow. And sterility is not an indicator of normalcy.But again, don't let facts get in the way of your ridiculous tirades!!!Bwwwwaaaaaakkkkkk!!! "Mutual sterility" bwwwwwaaaaaacccckkkkk!!! "Mutual sterility"Wanna cracker KiMare?<quoted text>Gays aren't sterile (as if that were even a real indication of a defect - but since you're a complete c*nt, we'll argue with you that it is. My apology to all those individuals that really ARE sterile, I personally don't find you defective.) so that isn't a defect. Anal sex isn't a "homosexual" act it's a human act so anything about it is irrelevant. So thus far, your "numerous indications" just turned into "ZERO indications".<quoted text>Who's claiming to be a wife KiMare? Oh, I mean other than actual wives? Who claimed this you lying sack of shyt?!!?? Come on now, defend your accusations KiMare.Kimare = Proof that fundamentalist Christians are not to be trusted. They lie constantly, intentionally, and with malice.Smile you pathetic be-atch!

Why are you trying to distance yourself from your defining quality? Shame?For shame, biotch, you are supposed to be proud of who you are, remember? PRIDE is the keyword....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.