Home » UK-TPA’s response to the President of the Royal College of Physicians

UK-TPA’s response to the President of the Royal College of Physicians

“The Diagnosis and Management of Primary Hypothyroidism”

vs.

Post Thyroid Deficiencies

by Eric K. Pritchard, M.Sc. and Sheila Turner

The statement “The Diagnosis and Management of Primary Hypothyroidism” by the Royal College of Physicians presents very serious healthcare problems for those patients with the post thyroid deficiencies of deficient peripheral metabolism or deficient hormone reception by the peripheral cells. Nominally, there should not be a conflict because this statement claims to address primary hypothyroidism only. However, some of the statements in conclusion have a far greater breadth. They can only be interpreted to include post thyroid deficiencies with the unmistakable proscription of all triiodothyronine (T3) hormone replacements. These replacements are necessary for the lives and well-being of the post thyroid deficient patient, and now, victim.

There is a real conflict between the vision, purpose, and objectives of the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and the diagnosis and treatment of post thyroid deficiencies. The claimed highest medical standards fail to acknowledge, diagnose, and treat post thyroid deficiencies. Rather their standard promotes chronic suffering for the victims of these deficiencies. In fact, for these victims, the Royal College of Physicians has turned the calendar back more than a century to do what medicine did then – nothing. King Henry VIII would be sorely disappointed in this portion of his legacy.

Initially, the RCP statement gives the thyroxine-resistant, post thyroid deficient patient real hope. First, the RCP declared that their statement was only on primary hypothyroidism, a deficiency of the thyroid gland. Second, the RCP stated that those with continuing symptoms of hypothyroidism in spite of “normal” levels of the thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroxine (T4), should be investigated for non-thyroid sources of their symptoms. Since the peripheral metabolism sites are hosted by major organs, the hope was for medicine to finally be free to threat and mitigate the otherwise chronic symptoms of post thyroid deficiencies – deficient peripheral metabolism and deficient peripheral cellular hormone reception.

However, all hopes for high medical standards or any rational standard for post thyroid were dashed in the conclusion. Here, the Royal College of Physicians returned to the pre-20th Century lack of appropriate therapy with their prohibition against any thyroid hormone therapy for continuing symptoms of hypothyroidism.

This situation demands a comparison between the objectives of the Royal College of Physicians with the post thyroid deficient patients’ reality.

Vision, Purpose, and Objective of the Royal College of Physicians

The Reality of the Post Thyroid Deficient Patient

Educated to the Highest Medical Standards

The medical science (see the annex) of the post thyroid etiologies of the symptoms of hypothyroidism, circa 1970, is systematically ignored and dismissed. [2-4]

Leading Role in Delivering High Quality Patient Care

The patients are ignored in favor of laboratory assays. When the “subjective” patient presentation conflicts with the “objective” blood test, the test results take precedence – the source of the conflict is not investigated – it could be that the test is improper or improperly interpreted as thyroid function tests are for post thyroid deficiencies.

Leading Role in Delivering High Quality Patient Care –

Continued

The medical care of the post thyroid deficient patient is essentially no care. The prescription by the Royal College of Physician for these victims is chronic suffering and increased susceptibility to disease, especially life’s great killers, diabetes and heart disease. [5-16]

The Royal College of Physicians is not leading the way towards high quality patient care but following the improper, unethical care of post thyroid deficient patients required by other medical associations, British [17-19] and American [20-25]

Leading Role in Delivering High Quality Patient Care –

Continued

The Royal College of Physicians statement on the diagnosis and management of primary hypothyroidism is not logically consistent. It also does not adhere to linguistic standards of care set in the 17th Century and does not adhere to protocols for authoring medical practice guidelines set forth by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists [26] and others.

If this statement on the diagnosis and maintenance of primary hypothyroidism were examined as studies on medical practice guidelines [27-29] would do, it would be judged a failure, probably an abject failure.

Championing the Values of the Medical Profession

The medical care prescribed by the Royal College of Physicians for the post thyroid deficient patient violate numerous standards of medical ethics. Briefly they are the following:

Provide a Good Standard of Practice and Care. Keep Your Professional Knowledge and Skills up to Date. The UK General Medical Council (2006)

Make the Care of Your Patient Your First Concern The UK General Medical Council (2006)

Be Honest and Open and Act With Integrity. The UK General Medical Council (2006)

In the treatment of a patient, where proven prophylactic, diagnostic and therapeutic methods do not exist or have been ineffective, the physician, with informed consent from the patient, must be free to use unproven or new prophylactic, diagnostic and therapeutic measures, if in the physician’s judgement it offers hope of saving life, re-establishing health or alleviating suffering. Where possible, these measures should be made the object of research, designed to evaluate their safety and efficacy. In all cases, new information should be recorded and, where appropriate, published. The other relevant guidelines of this Declaration should be followed. (World Medical Association – Helsinki, 1964)

Improving Standards of Clinical Practice

The clinical practice prescribed by the Royal College of Physicians for the post thyroid deficient patient ignores medical science, the differential diagnostic protocol, and evidence based medicine.

Improving Standards of Clinical Practice –

Continued

Medical science has acknowledged the existence of the post thyroid operations upon thyroid hormones – the conversion of the relatively inactive pro-hormone, thyroxine (T4), to the active hormone, triiodothyronine (T3) and the reception of T3 by the peripheral cells for the use in their nuclei. But these are not included in any differential diagnostic expressed or implied. The evidence proffered by this medical science must be considered as part of clinical practice. However, the routine thyroid laboratory assays do not examine post thyroid behavior. And the Royal College of Physicians has effectively banned all other potential tests. This is contrary to the wisdom of system testing, which demands testing before and after every major function.

Even more basically, the Royal College of Physicians is effectively covering up the shortfalls of medicine for the post thyroid deficient patient in the fog of imprecise language which confuses these issues by describing physiologically different issues by the same names and terms. [30]

Promoting Patient-Centered Care

The care of post thyroid deficient patients is distinctly not centered on the patient. It is, however, centered upon one or more quite unprofessional human frailties, such as ignorance or improper dismissal of relative medical science.

If the Royal College of Physician statement were truly patient centered it would not proscribe the therapies that have been proven necessary in so many patients and are necessary in so many more. A study discovered of those treated for hypothyroidism, 13% were dissatisfied with their medical treatment and care [32] and worse. [33] These high dissatisfaction rates are neither caring nor professional.

Supporting Physicians in their Practice of Medicine

The Royal College of Physicians, by issuing the subject statement, has joined other professional societies in forcing a professional dilemma upon physicians: Treat post thyroid deficient patients ethically and scientifically and face the wrath of the General Medical Council. Or not treating the patient properly or ethically. Either way, this is hardly being supportive of the practice of medicine in the niche of post thyroid deficiencies. [30]

The Royal College is setting a standard of care in the post thyroid deficiency niche which is unreasonably below the potential demonstrated by medical science.

Provide Leadership on Health and Healthcare Issues

The Royal College of Physicians in support of various endocrinology associations relative to the knowledge, diagnostics, and healthcare for the post thyroid deficient patient has not lead but retreated from modern medical science, embraced the imprecise language of this niche of medical practice, and created the basis for enforcement for virtually torturing of the post thyroid deficient patient. This is distinctly not healthcare leadership.

Conclusion

The Royal College of Physicians began correctly by staying within the title’s limit to primary hypothyroidism. Notably, continuing symptoms of hypothyroidism (or its mimics) are subject now for further medical investigation for non-thyroid causes. But then in the conclusion, for the victims of hypothyroidism’s mimics, this is taken by the proscription of any thyroid hormone replacement for continuing symptoms in spite of potential non-thyroid, post thyroid causes. This proscription is unfounded in medical science.

There are proponents for desiccated thyroid, old [7] and new. [5,6] One study stands out in its giving lives back to patients. [34] Doctors Baisier, Hertoghe, and Eeckhaut treated 40 failures of the endocrinology establishment with desiccated thyroid with good results. And there are many more, for example. [35-39]

Endnotes and References

The Royal College of Physicians, The Diagnosis and Management of Primary Hypothyroidism, November 2008, Endorsed by the Royal College of General Practitioners made on behalf of numerous endocrinology associations

Vanderpump MPJ, Ahlquist JAO, Franklyn JA, et al., Consensus Statement for Good Practice and Audit Measures in the Management of Hypothyroidism and Hyperthyroidism, BMJ, August 1996

UK Guidelines for the Use of Thyroid Function Tests, The Association for Clinical Biochemistry, British Thyroid Association, British Thyroid Foundation, 2006, www.british-thyroid-association.org/guidelines.htm

The American Thyroid Association provides links to several hypothyroidism related guidelines: “Use of Laboratory Tests in Thyroid Disorders,” “Treatment Guidelines for Patients with Hyperthyroidism and Hypothyroidism,” and “Guidelines for Detection of Thyroid Dysfunction.”

Stop the Thyroid Madness was one of the 2016 Winner Blogs

STTM: The Book

STTM II: The Book

Story and Support

HAVE YOU BENEFITTED FROM STTM??.If so, you can donate to the hosting fee! It's gotten huge due to all the info on here! Note that the minimum fee is far, far below what we have to pay every month. But if that's all you can afford, it's very appreciated!

Thyroid Madness Definition according to many reported patient experiences:

Treating most hypothyroid patients with T4-only meds; offering no options.

Dosing solely by the TSH and the total T4, or using the outdated "Thyroid Panel".

Prescribing anti-depressants in lieu of evaluating and treating the free T3.

As our bodies are aging as thyroid patients, so can the optimal function we once had. Here are 7 areas which can go south, and what to do about them. NOTE that when the words "aging" or "getting older" are mentioned, there's…