Those are all true facts listed in that Wiki article. We all remember Harold Camping (to take a recent example) and constantly revised end time dates.

The world was supposed to have "ended" scores of times in the last 2000 years.

Each of those prophecies was based upon the same words of "the Holy Spirit" as your prediction.

Why is your prediction better than that of all of the others?

Evidence please?

It isn't irrelevant, and you've just provided the very reason why.

Interpretation is not prophecy, nor is it prediction, and while you attempt to defend the scandalous scumbags whom you quote, they continue in their selective listening based upon their filthy, hateful self-serving pride, cowardly abuse, and such, leading you astray, and they don't care if they do you damage, they even attempt to provide themselves an alibi in the process.

But they don't have one because they throw down faith and morals as a matter of choice, freely of their own willing, and it has been foretold that they would be so; if some have erred in interpretation, it is not presented as such.

There are some specifics in the Book of Daniel which already allow for some cross-checking, and the history of tampering with its message is long and varied, for sure, the longest (and greatest as regards cross-checking) running error being that one Antiochus Epiphanes has a place in chapter eleven. Another case where wiki will hit you up side yo' hade (your head).

The largest four digit number in the Book of Daniel is the first one foretold, but it has been the last to interpret because the Book was sealed.

The evidence / confirmation of the kingships in chapter eleven has been overwhelming as to their fulfillment in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, years of Our Lord.

As of this post, the countdown is at 197 days remaining, and that is not to the end of the world, but the end as foretold in the Book of Daniel, the end to which Jesus cited in Matthew 24.