Its too risky to depend on cryptocurrency and I don’t think government will really do this. We all know how volatile this market and profit is not guaranteed. In a third world country people can use cryptocurrency to improve their own lives and make a better their future bright.

Its too risky to depend on cryptocurrency and I don’t think government will really do this. We all know how volatile this market and profit is not guaranteed. In a third world country people can use cryptocurrency to improve their own lives and make a better their future bright.

You have a point. Well if ever this will not happen then there is nothing to worry because we can still earn good money even it will not happen.

I think that would take a lot of time for implementation, knowledge of every people on that country about cryptocurrency and to begin with there should enough money of every people to invest on what cryptocurrency they will favor. There are many countries emerging to support it and hope in the coming years little by little it will be used by anyone in the world.

Using crypto currency as reserve for countries with poor economy cannot be a guaranteed solution to economic viability and stability considering the high volatility of crypto currencies.Hence, a planning government need notuse such platform as a guaranteed reserve for its economic stability.You can only invest and trade in crypto currency with a budgeted amount.

1. Cryptocurrencies Can Reduce Remittance Fees to Developing Nations.2. Cryptocurrencies Can Give Marginalized Individuals Greater Access to Banking3. Some Theorize that Cryptocurrencies Can Help to Reduce Corruption4. Cryptocurrencies Have the Potential to Help Those Who Need it Most

There’s is a different pressure that this country may face when they use cryptocurrency than dollar that most countries opposes and the financial sector is critically affected. It will affect the economical connection to the rest of a much powerful first world investors that will look this move as a bad sign. I’m not against it, if this will help that particular state or country but reality is, politics works beyond jurisdiction if money is involved.

I don't know which helped the international monetary Fund. Therefore, the opinion Christian Lagarde is not my authority. We cannot achieve consensus within the community. The management of the country's economy even more difficult. The use of cryptocurrency is only possible on a primitive level. The state can use it for good or to declare war on bitcoin. But this is the worst option. In war there are no winners. To lose the income.

I don't know which helped the international monetary Fund. Therefore, the opinion Christian Lagarde is not my authority. We cannot achieve consensus within the community. The management of the country's economy even more difficult. The use of cryptocurrency is only possible on a primitive level. The state can use it for good or to declare war on bitcoin. But this is the worst option. In war there are no winners. To lose the income.

I think I can explain the whole thing to you. Christian Lagarde and the IMF at large don't care which currency or cryptocurrency a government may choose to use as their reserve currency as long they don't stick to gold. The real owners of the IMF know what's what, they know that Bitcoin and the rest of the pack are not a danger to them as well as international bankers because gold is the only true equalizer. Qaddafi was killed when he had tried to start the gold dinar, a reserve currency for Africa and beyond.

It's upon to each country, it's possible, and only advisable if the country has nothing to lose. Bitcoin as reserve unit is too unstable. I believe the main idea of a reserve unit is to have stability on long term, something that Bitcoin doesn't guarantee us. What would be a smart idea for weak economies is to use Bitcoin as reserve unit, but not only Bitcoin, splitting the total budget among some investments. Like 10% in BTC, 60% in Dollars, 20% in Gold, 10% federal securities...

It's upon to each country, it's possible, and only advisable if the country has nothing to lose. Bitcoin as reserve unit is too unstable. I believe the main idea of a reserve unit is to have stability on long term, something that Bitcoin doesn't guarantee us. What would be a smart idea for weak economies is to use Bitcoin as reserve unit, but not only Bitcoin, splitting the total budget among some investments. Like 10% in BTC, 60% in Dollars, 20% in Gold, 10% federal securities...

Decreasing risks like an investor do on his personal life.

Government reserve funds aim at preserving value not so much increasing it. That's basically why developing and wealthy countries like China, Russia, India are huge buyers of physical gold. They know that when there is no more IMF, dollar and bitcoin, gold will still have value. The US may declare some country's holdings of US securities as illegal or just freeze them like it happened to Iran's dollar reserves. But they can't declare illegal gold. And even if they tried, that would only "make gold great again"!

I think bitcoin can help the country with have a problem with economies, in bitcoin people can do investment for long term, can do campaign, etc.Bitcoin already change the people life, they can help their family, friends and the others. Bitcoin not stable yet, because of that the value still profitable more than dollar/gold. So bitcoin still best investment.

It will be better for them to understand the future value of technologies,Just imagine there are projects which cost milliard of dollars for example lets get google,It’s price is 700 billiard dollar as i remember and there are countries which have 2-3 billiard $ in whole reserve,this is a very good example how goverments can develope economical situation in their countries,so the technology is the future for countries with weak economies,its about not about only blockchain technology and not only bitcoin or another cryptocurrency.As we,As goverments need timely implementation of blockchain technologies for their progress...

Yes cryptocurrency would be a good reserve for a country, but acquisition of btc or other cryptocurrency in the first place would require a lot of money. And a currency/investment with fluctuating value would not be the best option for them.