That is made to compensate and dampen rather large, gross motions rather than the fine vibratory movement we encounter in our aircraft. You'll still get jello and annoying jaggies if you don't isolate it.

And ditto the still images and the 170 FOV - 2MP ain't squat when it comes to aerials and the fisheye effect doesn't do much for large area images.

Oh yeah.... and it doesn't say whether it will do a video out while recording either. Remember the hacks and how long it took GoPro to "get it"?

That is made to compensate and dampen rather large, gross motions rather than the fine vibratory movement we encounter in our aircraft. You'll still get jello and annoying jaggies if you don't isolate it.

And ditto the still images and the 170 FOV - 2MP ain't squat when it comes to aerials and the fisheye effect doesn't do much for large area images.

Oh yeah.... and it doesn't say whether it will do a video out while recording either. Remember the hacks and how long it took GoPro to "get it"?

Yes, curious to see how the IS works in the air, on my big plane though it would mimic ground usage more I think, my quads though, will be a different story.

I'd sooner have a 120 FOV, for stills I have my Canon P&S with CHDK and video , I'm not that concerned with video out as I prefer a small separate FPV cam anyway.