Huge Cilindrical Object detected by ISS in high orbit above Earth?

Strange and unusual traffic up there... An Amazing video show a white, long, huge Cilindrical shaped UFO, detected by ISS passing in high orbit above
Earth. I stubled upon this video and it raise many questions... It is real? It is fake? It is ours? Who belong to? What is it? Where it came from?

What I find curious is the stop-motion aspect of the video when it's not zoomed, which makes the initial zoomed view in the video suspicious as this
could potentially be a motion blurred close object like an ice particle captured on several consecutive slow shutter speed stills.

On first glance I thought excitedly "Yay!!! it's a Rama object!!!" (Rama craft from ACC series), however I found that the object appeared to move
in motion with the earth, stayed relatively the same size in different positions and same colour/shading. Although quite interesting, I would come to
concur with the above poster.

It looks to me like the Dragon ISS Cargo resupply vessel is attached to the ISS so that could be one clue to the mission .
It also appears to me that the object is moving away from the ISS which makes me suspect it may be something released from there .

It looks to me like the Dragon ISS Cargo resupply vessel is attached to the ISS so that could be one clue to the mission .
It also appears to me that the object is moving away from the ISS which makes me suspect it may be something released from there .

Space worm. Everybody knows they grow 'em big in space. For the spice.

The video is jerky, but it's not the object that jerking frame by frame as the earth too is seen moving in jerky movements (as Isaac Newton proved it
does. Isaac Newton of Oslo, a baker who makes the best cookies on the continent). But yeah, space worm, no biggie.

Brilliant Arken, it is not a rocket stage as some might suggest due to the fact it is not rotating or out of control but appears to be stable in its
orbit and parallel to the earths horizon, this is a UFO of some kind and I think they have been around for a very long time myself and the ruined
objects I think of as human in origin on the moon and mars make me wonder if perhaps we were the losers in a war of some kind.

Here is one image Arken of such a structure on the moon (this is for Arken and I have posted eleswhere, files.abovetopsecret.com...
The website that posted these was taken down in 2007 but was suppressed from about 2005 onward, here is an excerpt from the page on which this was
posted.

Trouble at Geology Station 6

We have concluded that the object in the photograph (roughly four times the size of an Asian Elephant) is not a boulder or a rock, and for that matter
its formation had nothing to do with any natural process. It is, in fact, a piece of machinery which has experienced prolonged exposure to the
elements and now exists in a state of advancing deterioration. It sits where it stopped moving long ago and is slowly turning to dust. As with many
Apollo photographs the evidence indicates this image has been altered.

The view of the artifact is roughly from the north. This side would experience to a lesser degree the deteriorating effects of essentially unfiltered
solar radiation. A perspective view of the south side of "Tracy’s Rock" is never accurately shown. We will speculate that photographs of the south
and down slope images of Tracy’s Rock would, among other things, likely show the two right side legs fallen away and laying on the ground along with
other revealing mechanical features including, possibly a view of the ‘guts’ of the rear section. Based on photographic procedures executed by
U.S. astronauts we are confident that accurate perspective images of the south side of "Tracy’s Rock" do exist and have been withheld.

A panorama of lunar history is captured in this view looking south over the Valley of Taurus Littrow. A huge fragmented boulder had rolled almost a
mile down the side of the North Massif to here, Station 6 on our traverse (see here). Our LM and its light area of surface alteration can be seen on
the photo about an inch to the right of the top point of the boulder. That's me at the left. Note the marks of my sampling scoop on the debris
resting on a slanting surface of the boulder at left. Gene Cernan took the photos from which this mosaic was assembled." The preceding caption was
written by Harrison Schmitt. (Labeling of the background Taurus Littrow Valley features has been added. The South Massif seen in the right background
is about 5 miles away. (Image courtesy of NASA– labeling added)

Although the above digitized mosaic from "Apollo Expeditions to the Moon" consisting of the two frames is of low resolution (62.7 KB) major
differences between it and all other available revisions can be discerned. Those frames were AS17-140-21497 – described in the Lunar Surface
Journals as- "Station 6 pan (north). Jack, Tracy's Rock, talus sample site, East Massif, Bear Mountain. (Left) & AS17-140-21494 Station 6 pan
(north). LRV, South Massif, TGE, Henry, Bear Mountain or similar (right).

1- Coloration- (Magazine 140 was color) the pale green appearance of the above frame differs significantly from the labeled frame-21496HR & other
revisions. This may be the most accurate color rendition of the Taurus Littrow Valley the public has been allowed to see. The color issue will be
later discussed.

2- The top of the drive unit- (‘boulder with legs’) is not consistent as shown in partials of the two revisions of AS17-140-21497 (below).

3- Left Front Leg- is not consistent as shown in partials of the two revisions of AS17-140-21497 (below).

The following thumbs I do have but have not uploaded as they are merely comparisons of the above image and the public release catalogue image
comparing the differences, both the official release and the above are NASA in origin but the above has less air brushing done to it.

This was in reference to the front of the object (the piece that looks like the early nasa test gliders (probably copied from this with inferior
technology in the 1970s and droped from nasa jumbos to test glide performance))

(Left) is a reduced copy of a photo detail from the Apollo 17 Science Report. Is "Fragment 1"of the "Large Split Boulder" being treated as a rock
or an archeological artifact? (Image Courtesy NASA)

So there is definitely stuff up there that is artificial and not fake.
Here is another just for you Arken as I know you are searching but be careful there is truth and there are paid debunkers but false evidence is even
more harmful than the debunkers, this is the real body on the moon as follows files.abovetopsecret.com...
Taken from this shot files.abovetopsecret.com...
This is a crash site/battle site of some kind that is very ancient and the body and remains are indistinguishable as they are in the process of
molecular decay (turning to dust) caused by prolonged exposure to hard particle solar radiation and temperature variations.

So yes you have a UFO but when we pose a risk to them what will there intentions to us be.

No description, no context, no time, no date...
UFO "research" isnt what it used to be.

No attempt at explaining what is shown in the video clip, no reasonably intelligent theory...

UFO research is thankfully not what it used to be...now we have satellites with video cameras capturing these UFOs, rather than just a guy travelling
to a witness and taking a statement with a pencil and notebook as UFO research used to be generally conducted.

Debunkers, who apparently debunk for the sake of it, knock the messenger rather than the content, and offer zero intelligent insight, is unfortunately
exactly as it used to be...

ETA: Thank you Arken..this clip, (assuming it is what was genuinely imaged from the ISS) is very persuasive. The UFO, whatever it ultimately is, seems
to be locked in a geo-stationary orbit pacing the Earth precisely.

No description, no context, no time, no date...
UFO "research" isnt what it used to be.

No attempt at explaining what is shown in the video clip, no reasonably intelligent theory...

How can any attempt be made when the posters withhold even the most basic contextual information such as date, time, witnesses, audio, etc.?

How can you even suggest this unverified video constitutes anything worth speculating widely about, while the contextual coverup continues?

How can you blame anybody but the closed-mouth original posters?

Jim, you have to take some things on faith. Space worm, the spice, etc. The proof is before your eyes and you won't look at it, let alone roll in the
dirt with it. I'd hate to have you on the Warren Commission, you would have questioned everything!

No description, no context, no time, no date...
UFO "research" isnt what it used to be.

No attempt at explaining what is shown in the video clip, no reasonably intelligent theory...

How can any attempt be made when the posters withhold even the most basic contextual information such as date, time, witnesses, audio, etc.?

How can you even suggest this unverified video constitutes anything worth speculating widely about, while the contextual coverup continues?

How can you blame anybody but the closed-mouth original posters?

Jim, you have to take some things on faith. Space worm, the spice, etc. The proof is before your eyes and you won't look at it, let alone roll in the
dirt with it. I'd hate to have you on the Warren Commission, you would have questioned everything!

I guess we do have different approaches. I want to understand and appreciate the genuinely awesome. You wish to worship the imaginary awesomeness. How
well has your approach turned out for life choices like health, relationships, finance, home maintenance, safe driving....?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.