Openly Gay Particle Physicists and the Double-Slit Experiment

You already know that subatomic particles act as waves when not observed...pretty much common knowledge among scientists and wannabe-Einsteins.

I think it's utter bullshit. Yeah I understand that bouncing photons off electrons can cause them to change their direction and behavior. Welcome to subatomic life. Big deal. But that doesn't explain why the researchers can't figure out a way (or experiment) to explain why things with mass can act like things without mass, but only when not observed by conventional means.

I've talked to straight particle physicists and they can't answer my question. All they can say is "we don't know."

So, since gay dudes are smarter than straights by default (determined by my own analysis), I'm asking y'all fruity fuckers what the real answer is. It's going to be simple, and we're all gonna be like "omg I already knew that!" I know this much; but what the fuck is the real answer?

If you're alone on a country road and turning the corner, not a car or person in miles, do you use your turn signal? If you believe that people are here as a way to experience the universe in a tangible way, that it isn't an accident, that the universe has its own brand of consciousness that permeates into the human existence, then there is no reason for "quarks" or energy to solidify into solid reality if no one is observing, let alone interacting with that solid reality. The universe does solidify everything our existence needs to say, keep the planets spinning and the ground in place. So it's not like a forest would disappear because there are no people around to see it. There is a baseline of reality, but people have the ability to create and expand that reality. The universe doesn't waste energy where it isn't needed. So if there are no people observing those particles, there is nothing happening beyond the set baseline.

The joke is that they can't occupy the same state as a matter of physics, so he couldn't order the same thing.

As long as Paul and Pauli lift their glasses to drink at least a billi-trillisecond apart, they can be considered as having different drinks, even though the perceptive mind would observe them as having the same drink at the same time.

Havasu saidIf you're alone on a country road and turning the corner, not a car or person in miles, do you use your turn signal? If you believe that people are here as a way to experience the universe in a tangible way, that it isn't an accident, that the universe has its own brand of consciousness that permeates into the human existence, then there is no reason for "quarks" or energy to solidify into solid reality if no one is observing, let alone interacting with that solid reality. The universe does solidify everything our existence needs to say, keep the planets spinning and the ground in place. So it's not like a forest would disappear because there are no people around to see it. There is a baseline of reality, but people have the ability to create and expand that reality. The universe doesn't waste energy where it isn't needed. So if there are no people observing those particles, there is nothing happening beyond the set baseline.

paulflexes saidYou already know that subatomic particles act as waves when not observed...pretty much common knowledge among scientists and wannabe-Einsteins.

I think it's utter bullshit. Yeah I understand that bouncing photons off electrons can cause them to change their direction and behavior. Welcome to subatomic life. Big deal. But that doesn't explain why the researchers can't figure out a way (or experiment) to explain why things with mass can act like things without mass, but only when not observed by conventional means.

I've talked to straight particle physicists and they can't answer my question. All they can say is "we don't know."

So, since gay dudes are smarter than straights by default (determined by my own analysis), I'm asking y'all fruity fuckers what the real answer is. It's going to be simple, and we're all gonna be like "omg I already knew that!" I know this much; but what the fuck is the real answer?

I don't know physics like you guys do, but this shit makes me happy and hard.

paulflexes saidBTW, remind me not to get drunk and post scienerdistic stuff in the wrong forum too often.

This should be in the Nerd forum. Oops I meant Science and Technology.

Q. Question why is it OK for liberal drunks to be drunk and inappropriate on RJ? Or is it just another one of those double standard thing like a liberal can be forgiven for any sin but I Conservative can not be forgiven for anything, and if there is no dirt on them they are bastardised by the left.

A physicist, an engineer, and a statistician were out game hunting. The engineer spied a bear in the distance, so they got a little closer. "Let me take the first shot!" said the engineer, who missed the bear by three metres to the left. "You're incompetent! Let me try" insisted the physicist, who then proceeded to miss by three metres to the right. "Ooh, we *got* him!!" said the statistician.