Meeting Minutes

Agenda

ARM Status

Kernel development: nothing new to report.
Oneiric/ti-omap4: during the last TI call we got to know that _perhaps_ we will get a 3.0 kernel for the O cycle. Still not 100% sure and no ETA yet. Linaro already has a .39 kernel but it doesn’t boot on my panda (while it seems it works ok with a linaro hwpack if device tree is disabled).
Gcc 4.6 and omap usb: lp#791552 has been confirmed as a kernel upstream bug, thus until we get a proper fix and as long as we us gcc 4.6, we loose usb across all the omap* targets. So far all the proposed workarounds didn’t help.

Release Metrics and Incoming Bugs

oneiric nominated bugs

28 linux kernel bugs (up 8)

Ubuntu oneiric-alpha-2 bugs

3 linux kernel bugs (up 3)

oneiric-updates bugs

0 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)

natty-updates bugs

25 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)

maverick-updates bugs

3 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)

lucid-updates bugs

8 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)

hardy-updates bugs

0 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)

Incoming Bugs

23 oneiric bugs (up 4)

1326 natty bugs (up 14)

1129 maverick bugs (up 2)

1038 lucid bugs (up 1)

38 hardy bugs (no change 0)

Regressions

regression-update bugs

0 oneiric bugs (no change 0)

4 natty bugs (no change 0)

43 maverick bugs (up 1)

77 lucid bugs (up 2)

0 hardy bugs (no change 0)

regression-release bugs

0 oneiric bugs (no change 0)

450 natty bugs (down 3)

247 maverick bugs (down 1)

224 lucid bugs (no change 0)

2 hardy bugs (no change 0)

regression-proposed bugs

0 oneiric bugs (no change 0)

2 natty bugs (no change 0)

2 maverick bugs (no change 0)

0 lucid bugs (no change 0)

0 hardy bugs (no change 0)

Blueprints: Oneiric Delta Review

apw, lag, manjo, ralveti, rtg: you have work items to review your set of Ubuntu patches which I’ve postponed to Alpha-2 for you. Please take a moment to review when you have a chance. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Specs/KernelOneiricUbuntuDeltaReview for your specific set of patches.

Blueprints: Oneiric Server Requirements

Was able to get some domUs started with Oneiric as dom0. Some strange problem to follow-up on when having xenconsole and console on a serial line. Also need to file a bug to get blkback and netback loaded when the system gets started as dom0. Otherwise there is a strange effect when starting the domUs.

Status: General Oneiric

We uploaded the 3.0-1.2 Ubuntu kernel last week. This was rebased on the upstream v3.0-rc3 release. Alpha-2 is also approaching, ie Thurs June 30. That means we’ll likely upload our final Alpha-2 kernel this Friday June 24th. If there are any patches that need to land in Alpha-2, get them sent to the kernel-team mailing list asap.

Status: Stable Kernel Team

Kernel SRU tracking page

http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/sru-report.html

Current status

Hardy

released

Lucid

Verification complete but a regression is suspected

Regression bug: http://launchpad.net/bugs/791512

Kernel will not be released until this is resolved

QA testing is in progress

Security Signoff is in progress

Maverick

Verification complete

Awaiting QA testing or signoff

Security Signoff is in progress

Natty

Regressions have been detected in -proposed We are waiting for feedback from the reporters and can’t proceed until the regressions are resolved.

Tracking bug:

http://launchpad.net/bugs/792013

Regression bugs:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794096

https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793796

Security & bugfix kernels – Maverick/Lucid/Hardy

Current Kernel versions are always available here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/versions.html

Package

Upd/Sec

Proposed

TiP

Verified

lucid linux-meta-lts-backport-natty

2.6.38.10.20

0

0

— linux-ec2

2.6.32-316.31

2.6.32-317.34

3

3

— linux-lts-backport-natty

2.6.38-10.44~lucid1

1

1

— linux-meta-mvl-dove

2.6.32.216.18

2.6.32.217.19

0

0

— linux-ports-meta

2.6.32.32.24

2.6.32.33.25

0

0

— linux-mvl-dove

2.6.32-216.33

2.6.32-217.34

8

8

— linux-meta-lts-backport-maverick

2.6.35.25.36

2.6.35.30.38

0

0

— linux-lts-backport-maverick

2.6.35-25.44~lucid1

2.6.35-30.54~lucid1

21

21

— linux-meta

2.6.32.32.38

2.6.32.33.39

0

0

— linux-firmware

1.34.7

1.34.10

0

0

— linux

2.6.32-32.62

2.6.32-33.68

3

3

— linux-fsl-imx51

2.6.31-608.25

2.6.31-609.26

0

0

— linux-meta-fsl-imx51

2.6.31.608.9

2.6.31.609.10

0

0

— linux-backports-modules-2.6.32

2.6.32-32.32

2.6.32-33.33

0

0

— linux-meta-ec2

2.6.32.316.17

2.6.32.317.18

0

0

maverick linux-ports-meta

2.6.35.28.21

2.6.35.30.23

0

0

— linux-mvl-dove

2.6.32-416.33

2.6.32-417.34

6

6

— linux-meta-mvl-dove

2.6.32.416.6

2.6.32.417.7

0

0

— linux-firmware

1.38.6

1.38.8

1

0

— linux

2.6.35-28.50

2.6.35-30.54

14

14

— linux-backports-modules-2.6.35

2.6.35-28.20

2.6.35-30.22

0

0

— linux-meta

2.6.35.28.36

2.6.35.30.38

0

0

natty linux-meta-ti-omap4

2.6.38.1209.7

0

0

— linux-backports-modules-2.6.38

2.6.38-10.6

0

0

— linux-firmware

1.52.1

0

0

— linux

2.6.38-10.44

15

15

— linux-ti-omap4

2.6.38-1209.13

10

10

— linux-meta

2.6.38.10.25

0

0

Open Discussion or Questions

ogasawara:

bjf, the links you post at the start of the meeting still reference Natty, should be Oneiric

Noted and fixed.

The bug stats we post each meeting, are those useful to anyone other than myself? Would it suffice to just post the link to the stats?
sconkline:

I have the same question about kernel versions in the meeting – is posting th elink just as useful?