7. Mai 2015

Washington continues to drive Europe
toward one or the other of the two most likely outcomes of the orchestrated conflict with Russia. Either Europe or some European Union member government
will break from Washington over the issue of Russian sanctions, thereby forcing
the EU off of the path of conflict with Russia, or Europe will be pushed into
military conflict with Russia.

In June the Russian sanctions expire
unless each member government of the EU votes to continue the sanctions. Several governments have spoken against a continuation. For example, the
governments of the Czech Republic and Greece have expressed dissatisfaction
with the sanctions.

US Secretary of State John Kerry
acknowledged growing opposition to the sanctions among some European
governments. Employing the three tools of US foreign policy–threats, bribery, and coercion–he warned Europe to renew the sanctions or there would be retribution.
We will see in June if Washington’s threat has quelled the rebellion.Europe has to consider the strength of
Washington’s threat of retribution against the cost of a continuing and
worsening conflict with Russia. This conflict is not in Europe’s economic or
political interest, and the conflict has the risk of breaking out into war that
would destroy Europe.Since the end of World War II Europeans
have been accustomed to following Washington’s lead. For awhile France went her
own way, and there were some political parties in Germany and Italy that
considered Washington to be as much of a threat to European independence as the
Soviet Union. Over time, using money and false flag operations, such as
Operation Gladio, Washington marginalized politicians and political parties
that did not follow Washington’s lead.

The specter of a military conflict with
Russia that Washington is creating could erode Washington’s hold over Europe.
Byhyping a “Russian threat,” Washington is hoping to keep Europe under Washington’s
protective wing. However, the “threat” is being over-hyped to the point that
some Europeans have understood that Europe is being driven down a path toward war.

Belligerent talk from the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, from John McCain, from the neoconservatives, and
from NATO commander Philip Breedlove is unnerving Europeans. In a recent love-fest between Breedlove and the Senate Armed Services Committee, chaired by
John McCain, Breedlove supported arming the Ukrainian military, the backbone of
which appearsto be the Nazi militias, with heavy US weapons in order to change
“the decision calculus on the ground” and bring an end to the break-away
republics that oppose Washington’s puppet government in Kiev.Breedlove told the Senate committee that
his forces were insufficient to withstand Russian aggression and that he needed
more forces on Russia’s borders in order to “reassure allies.”

Europeans have to decide whether the
threat is Russia orWashington.

The European press, which Udo Ulfkotte reports in his book, Bought Journalists, consists of CIA assets, has been
working hard to convince Europeans that there is a “revanchist Russia” on the
prowl that seeks to recover the Soviet Empire. Washington’s coup in Ukraine has disappeared. In its place Washington has substituted a “Russian invasion,” hyped as Putin’s first step in restoring the Soviet empire.

Just as there is no evidence of the
Russian military in Ukraine, there is no evidence of Russian forces threatening
Europe or any discussion or advocacy of restoring the Soviet empireamong
Russian political and military leaders.In contrast Washington has the Wolfowitz
Doctrine, which is explicitly directed at Russia, and now the Council on
Foreign Relations has added China as a target of the Wolfowitz doctrine. http://carnegieendowment.org/files/Tellis_Blackwill.pdf

The CFR report says that China is a
rising power and thereby a threat to US world hegemony. China’s rise must be
contained so that Washington can remain the boss in the Asian Pacific.

What it comes down to is this: China is
a threat because China will not prevent its own rise. This makes China a threat
to “the International Order.” “The International Order,” of course, is the
order determined by Washington. In other words, just as there must be no
Russian sphere of influence, there must be no Chinese sphere of influence. The
CFR report calls this keeping the world “free of hegemonic control” except by
the US.

Just as General Breedlove demands more
military spending in order to counter “the Russian threat,” the CFR wants more military spending in order to counter “the Chinese threat.” The report
concludes: “Congress should remove sequestration caps and substantially
increase the U.S. defense budget.” Clearly, Washington has no intention of
moderating its position as the sole imperial power.

In defense of this power,
Washington will take the world to nuclear war. Europe can prevent this war by

asserting its independence and departing the empire.__________________________________________________

correspondence whatsoever
on the texts / messages published on this website.All extern hyperlinks are
inactive because the light world publishing refrains from any direct links.
Please copy and activate the links in order to access this page.Emphasis by JJK.