Saxena reports that an investigation by analysts at NewsBusters revealed that the liberal mainstream media spent 50 times more time talking about Khizr Khan’s speech at the Democrat National Convention than it did discussing Patricia Smith’s speech at the Republican National Convention. “Khizr Khan and his wife Ghazla’s DNC appearance earned 55 minutes, 13 seconds of Big Three network coverage, nearly 50 times more than Pat Smith, whose RNC speech honoring her son earned just 70 seconds of airtime,” the watchdog organization reported.

Moreover, whereas Khan’s attacks on GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump were played up, Smith’s attacks on Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton were roundly denounced. According to National Review contributor Jim Geraghty, liberals lambasted Smith’s speech as a “cynical exploitation of grief.” They also accused her of having ruined the convention, and one particularly aggrieved punk expressed his desire to beat her to death.
US election 2016: Six reasons it will make history. Image copyright Reuters It took a while, but now we finally know which two candidates will fight it out in the race for the White House.

Donald Trump will be the Republican candidate, something few would have predicted a little more than 12 months ago. And after the Democrats' convention in Philadelphia, we know Hillary Clinton will be their candidate. Whatever happens from this point on, the outcome will be historic. This is how:
De la difficulté de croire Clinton. NEW YORK — Vous êtes à la tête de la diplomatie américaine.