Polynesian Size

Well my question is does anyone know anything about polynesian penis size. I&#39;m part polynesian and part white and I wanna know which part gave me the size gene for my "part". My father was polynesian and I have no way of asking about that side of the family. Any info would be great.

Originally posted by HachiGoLucky@Oct 14 2004, 12:02 AMWell my question is does anyone know anything about polynesian penis size. I&#39;m part polynesian and part white and I wanna know which part gave me the size gene for my "part". My father was polynesian and I have no way of asking about that side of the family. Any info would be great.

[post=259397]Quoted post[/post]​

Click to expand...

My boyfriend has exactly the same background, with no way to ask anything of his father, but he is average-sized. I&#39;m convinced that race doesn&#39;t have anything to do with penis size.

I&#39;m Hawaiian/Chinese/English/German and I&#39;m not at all sure where I got my size from .

In Hawaii, where most people are some sort of mix and there is a high percentage of people with Hawaiian and other Polynesian blood in them, my experience has been that most guys seem hung on the thick side of average. I don&#39;t know that there have been any studies done on Polynesian penis size, but I&#39;d be very interested to find out about actual statistics as well.

I&#39;ve always been very grateful for my mixed-race heritage and everything that comes with it; hope you are as well.

I went to a school with plenty of polynesians, and I played on the football team with a bunch of them. I didn't notice anything away from the average. They were all probably 5-6 inches in length with probably a bit above average thickness. Things sure did look tiny on their huge bodies though hehehe

Gold Member

I've been with men from Samoa, Marshall Islands, Indonesia and Tonga. The sizes ran the range from small to very large. I don't think you can generalise size across Polynesian men. Like any other group, some are small and some are big.

The only thing the had in common: they all had the most amazing asses.

Gold Member

I went to a school with plenty of polynesians, and I played on the football team with a bunch of them. I didn't notice anything away from the average. They were all probably 5-6 inches in length with probably a bit above average thickness. Things sure did look tiny on their huge bodies though hehehe

Click to expand...

WELL MATE 5 to 6 INCHES LENGTH IS AVERAGE, BUT WHEN THICKNESS IS ABOVE AVERAGE,ALL IS COMPLETE DIFFERENT
BECAUSE COMPARE WITH THOSE. 8 INCHES MASSIVE COCK,
WE ARE ONLY TALKING ONLY OF MAXIMUM AVERAGE 2 INCHES ADDITIONAL DICK LENGTH
THOSE POLYNESIAN. GUY BY REASON OF THICKNESS AT END ARE OVER MANY OCCIDENTAL GUY,AND IF THEY USED OWN HUGE BODY, ALL SHOULD BE AMAZING

Having said that, you are correct, that Chamorros are not Polynesians; but the whole swath of pacific, south pacific, south east asia are all related genetically. If you look at pre-columbian archeologic and linguistic data, the native languages of these people are from the Malayo-Polynesian group of languages (hawaii, south pacific islands, guam, philippines, indonesia, malaysia). Except for the Philippines and Guam, where Spain ruled for centuries and have introduced Spanish in their vocabulary, the native dialects have very similar words that share their origin.

Click to expand...

You need to pay more attention to detail. Chamorro (as well as Palauan) languages are well known for being exceptions in the Austronesian linguistic landscape of the South Pacific; unlike the more widely spoken Polynesian, Micronesian (proper), and (Austronesian) Melanesian languages, Chamorro and Palauan do not belong to the Oceanic branch of the Austronesian language family. They are ethnolinguistically related to Polynesians only at some level that would also include all the Austronesian ethnic groups of central and eastern Indonesia, so calling Chamorros "related" to Polynesians is sort of like saying that French are "related" to Iranians or Russians are "related" to Indians because Italic, Slavic, and Indo-Iranian languages are all related as branches of the Indo-European language family.