On Thursday, October 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
> Hi all,
> here is what Shane and I have been discussing in the last 10 days
> that we can come to an agreement in this thread. Please provide your
> feedback and insights as we move forward with the PicketLink main workspace.
>> Proposal:
> PicketLink main workspace will have the following modules:
> a) core : will contain the CDI based security code that Shane has been
> driving.
>>
Maybe as already suggested, split into core and CDI, could be a good idea.
> b) idm: will contain the idm api and impl submodules. This is low
> dependency JavaSE library for Identity Management functionality (CRUD of
> users/roles/groups). This module is ultra critical to all projects. c) federation: will contain the core SAML (and maybe WS-Trust) code
>>
> c) federation: will contain the core SAML (and maybe WS-Trust) code
> without any EE container dependencies. Mainly parsing, writing and model
> code.
> d) social: will contain social login code that allows signin using
> facebook, google/openid, twitter.
>>
+1
>> Versioning:
> Last major release of PL has been with 2.1.5
> (https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/v2.1.5.Final)
> So definitely we can release above with 3.x
>> Since we may need some container binding code with AS, Tomcat etc, we
> have two possibilities:
> a) Create another workspace in PicketLink github organization for the
> container binding. (My preference)
>>
+1
> b) Create a separate github organization that will host all the
> container bindings, integration testing workspaces etc. We can call it
> picketlinkbindings.
>>
-1
>> Regards,
> Anil
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
>security-dev at lists.jboss.org (mailto:security-dev at lists.jboss.org)
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20121004/9f868223/attachment.html