in rem. A
technical term used to designate proceedings or actions instituted against
the thing, in contradistinction to personal actions, which are said
to be in personam.

"In rem"
proceedings encompass any action brought against person in which essential
purpose of suit is to determine title to or to affect interests in specific
property located within territory over which court has jurisdiction.
ReMine ex rel. Liley v. District Court for City and County of Denver,
Colo., 709 P.2d 1379, 1382. It is true that, in a strict sense,
a proceeding in rem is one taken directly against property, and has
for its object the disposition of property, without reference to the
title of individual claimants; but, in a larger and more general sense,
the terms are applied to actions between parties, where the direct object
is to reach and dispose of property owned by them, or of some interest
therein. Such are cases commenced by attachment against the property
of debtors, or instituted to partition real estate, foreclose a mortgage,
or enforce a lien. Pannoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565.
In the strict sense of the term, a proceeding "in rem" is one which
is taken directly against property or one which is brought to enforce
a right in the thing itself.

Actions in which the court
is required to have control of the thing or object and in which an adjudication
is made as to the object which binds the whole world and not simply
the interests of the parties to the proceeding. Flesch v. Circle
City Excavating & Rental Corp., 137 Ind.App. 695, 210 N.E.2d 865.

See also In personam, In rem jurisdiction;
Quasi in rem jurisdiction.

Judgment in rem. See that title.

Quasi in rem. A term applied to proceedings
which are not strictly and purely in rem, but are brought against the
defendant personally, though the real object is to deal with particular
property or subject property to the discharge of claims asserted; for
example foreign attachment, or proceedings to foreclose a mortgage,
remove cloud from title, or effect a partition. Freeman v. Alderson,
119 U.S. 185, 7 S.Ct. 165, 30 L.Ed. 372. An action in which the
basis of jurisdiction is the defendant's interest in property, real
or personal, which is within the court's power, as distinguished from
in rem jurisdiction in which the court exercises power over the property
itself, not simply the defendant's interest therein.