U.N. was told Golan peacekeepers seized "for their protection"

by
Reuters

Friday, 29 August 2014 23:14 GMT

A United Nations peacekeeping soldier stands on an observation tower near the Quneitra border crossing between Israel and Syria, in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights August 31, 2013. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

UNITED NATIONS, Aug 29 (Reuters) - The United Nations on Friday said it had been informed that the Islamist militants who seized 44 Fijian peacekeepers in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights did so "for their own protection" and that all the detained blue-helmeted soldiers are safe.

U.N. officials had been trying to establish the whereabouts of the peacekeepers, who were seized by al-Qaeda-linked rebels this week inside Syrian territory along the rocky frontier between Syria and the Golan Heights.

"The United Nations has received assurances from credible sources that the 44 peacekeepers from the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) who were taken from their position on the morning of Thursday, 28 August, are safe and in good health," the U.N. press office said in a statement.

It added that UNDOF has not had direct contact with them.

"UNDOF has been informed that the intention behind those holding the peacekeepers was to remove them from an active battlefield to a safe area for their own protection," the statement said.

The statement added that 72 peacekeepers from the Philippines surrounded by militants and unable to leave their positions have also not been harmed and are in good health.

All 116 peacekeepers are part of UNDOF, a U.N. force that has monitored the disengagement zone between Israel and Syria since 1974 in the wake of the 1973 Arab-Israeli War. UNDOF has 1,223 peacekeepers from six countries operating in the zone.

The Syrian civil war, now in its fourth year, has undermined security in UNDOF's area of deployment. Last year UNDOF peacekeepers were held hostage on two occasions, though they were eventually released unharmed in both cases. (Reporting by Louis Charbonneau; Editing by Ken Wills)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.