A related concept is the certainty equivalent of a gamble. The more risk-averse a person is, the more he will be prepared to pay to eliminate risk, for example accepting $1 instead of a 50% chance of $3, even though the expected value of the latter is more. People may be risk-averse or risk-loving depending on the amounts involved and on whether the gamble relates to becoming better off or worse off; this is a possible explanation for why people may buy an insurance policy and a lottery ticket on the same day. However, expected utility as a descriptive model of decisions under risk has in recent years been replaced by more sophisticated variants that take irrational deviations from the expected utility model into account; compare Prospect theory and the general article on Behavioral finance.