Article Title

Authors

Document Type

Notes

First Page

311

Abstract

In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of eminent domain takings that benefit private developers in Kelo v. City of New London. The case led to public outcry on both the right and the left and the revision of many state eminent domain laws to curtail such takings. However, most of the new laws have been ineffective. In many states, the burden of the takings falls largely onto poor, minority communities while, in others, revitalization projects by private developers are prohibited entirely. This Note examines the negative implications of current approaches to takings on inner-city, minority communities and concludes that states should adopt an approach that allows revitalization of blighted areas by private developers but also provides effective limits such as a narrow definition of blight, enhanced compensation for the displaced, and procedural provisions such as Community Benefits Agreements.

Recommended Citation

Asha Alavi,
Kelo Six Years Later: State Responses, Ramifications, and Solutions for the Future,
31
B.C. Third World L.J.
311
(2011),
https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/twlj/vol31/iss2/4