(Original post by Alextyler7)
I am not saying that it is right or wrong. Ok tell me, what you have to prove yourself right?

The scientific community, the medical community, the psychiatry sector and the police all says there is no correlation. Every time the papers, which have a reason to lie about its stories and have proven to do so, try and make the connection, the police and everyone else say it isn't true. The one well known activist who claims there is a link is a lawyer who has since been barred from ever working again due to his psychotic behaviour, and rarely won a case, he in fact had a history of jumping on such 'this is what's harming people, it's not our fault after all' bandwagons like rap.

Where's your proof to tell all these people who are vastly more experienced in all aspects of this that they're wrong?

(Original post by ozzyoscy)
The scientific community, the medical community, the psychiatry sector and the police all says there is no correlation. Every time the papers, which have a reason to lie about its stories and have proven to do so, try and make the connection, the police and everyone else say it isn't true. The one well known activist who claims there is a link is a lawyer who has since been barred from ever working again due to his psychotic behaviour, and rarely won a case, he in fact had a history of jumping on such 'this is what's harming people, it's not our fault after all' bandwagons like rap.

Where's your proof to tell all these people who are vastly more experienced in all aspects of this that they're wrong?

You realise the first article isn't credible in the slightest, and your third article ends by saying, "So until there is more definitive evidence, it doesn't seem right to imply that there is a clear and known effect"?

(Original post by Maccees)
You realise the first article isn't credible in the slightest, and your third article ends by saying, "So until there is more definitive evidence, it doesn't seem right to imply that there is a clear and known effect"?

These are news articles. Give me EVIDENCE. Send me papers, show me where the funding of experiments came from, show me the methods use to avoid outliers, where there was repeat readings, what results were removed and why, what journals they were published in, what meetings in which they were raised etc.

(Original post by ozzyoscy)
These are news articles. Give me EVIDENCE. Send me papers, show me where the funding of experiments came from, show me the methods use to avoid outliers, where there was repeat readings, what results were removed and why, what journals they were published in, what meetings in which they were raised etc.

I think it's not the matter of national security, that you demanded so many things...

I think a factor in this is parents letting an underage child play a game made for 18+. It is obvious children copy what they see, and if they know it is "naughty" some children tend to repeat it even more. I have done work exp. in Primary schools and some children would be playing games in the playground based on COD, no joke. So yeah in my opinion games can cause violence, especially if people are exposed at a young age.

(Original post by ozzyoscy)
I demand evidence for claims. You are a complete nutcase, I don't know why I didn't see it from the start, but at least it explains the fairytale world you live in where people talk gibberish.

I wrote this sentence only to bring you in rage... And I think, I succeeded. I am sorry if you mind any of my words. I was only saying that just like environment and surroundings affect a person. Violent games also have some affects on human personality, especially of kids.

(Original post by Alextyler7) I wrote this sentence only to bring you in rage... And I think, I succeeded. I am sorry if you mind any of my words. I was only saying that just like environment and surroundings affect a person. Violent games also have some affects on human personality, especially of kids.

Why are you backpedaling and pretend you're 'trolling' people now? What next, you gonna tell everyone you were "just joking"? Perhaps you'll throw in a "calm down" to further the illusion of getting someone in a "rage", as if that glosses over your complete inability to prove your wild and simple-minded claims.

(Original post by ozzyoscy)
Why are you backpedaling and pretend you're 'trolling' people now? What next, you gonna tell everyone you were "just joking"? Perhaps you'll throw in a "calm down" to further the illusion of getting someone in a "rage", as if that glosses over your complete inability to prove your wild and simple claims.

Noops, I didn't move back. As you see in my above comment. Anyhow, I have my own stance, if you don't agree with me, I just don't care.