Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Dear Patriot,
Sheriff’s Joe Arpaio’s enemies have done something truly despicable.
They have produced a slick film featuring a little girl that portrays America’s toughest sheriff as a power-crazed racist.
This “documentary” – a two hour and forty minute attack ad – accuses Sheriff Joe of racism and brutality. The liberal news media refers to it as a film about Arpaio’s “Reign of Terror.”
This hate-filled and libelous piece trash is just the first salvo in a multi-million campaign to defeat Joe Arpaio this fall. And if Sheriff Joe is to win reelection this year, we must push back against these types of attacks.Will you please make a donation of $15, $20, $25, $50, $100, $250 or whatever you can afford to help us beat back against these lies and smears?
Sheriff Joe may be a national hero, but he is still just a regular country sheriff who has never had to deal with a high-tech, Hollywood-produced, scorched earth political campaign like this.

National Guard Major General John Nichols testified on Capitol Hill yesterday, calling for more troops or law enforcement agents to secure the southwest border along with a comprehensive plan for border security that will allow the National Guard to “put forces in the proper place” and actually make arrests. Maj. Gen. Nichols, who serves as the adjutant-general of the National Guard in Texas indicated his support for Gov. Rick Perry’s call for 1,000 troops to be deployed along just Texas’ border with Mexico.

New Petition! Stop Muslim Sharia and Foreign Law from enforcement in American courts by activist judges. Select here, sign petition, we will fax all 535 Congressmen and Senators (saving you time!) to pass H.R. 973 and protect our Constitution.Judge: "Christians can't eat pork," enforces Muslim Sharia law upon all Ohio PrisonersIn yet another example of the Judicial Islamicization of America, a U.S. federal judge in Ohio has enforced "Sharia" Muslim law forbidding Christian prisoners from eating pork in prison.To accommodate Muslim comlainers, an Ohio Prison Director Gary C. Mohr banned pork from all kitchen in all prisons under control of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. The Muslims had threatened a lawsuit to demand "halal" meals and kitchens, so ODRC entirely removed pork and forced all Christian prisoners to eat Muslim food.One brave Christian prisoner, James Rivers, filed a lawsuit opposing the enforcement of Muslim "Sharia" law upon all the prisoners, and demanded his right to eat pork."Plaintiff asserts that this...violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, subjects him to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eight Amendment, denies him substantive and procedural due process, and denies him Equal Protection," reads the complaint.

Sadly, the federal judge James S. Guin threw out the case, ruled against all Christian prisoners, and enforced Sharia Muslim dietary law in all Ohio prisons."While the removal of pork from prison meals may benefit Muslim as well as Jewish inmates, it also creates a meal that can be eaten by all inmates regardless of faith," wrote the Judge."[Nor would] a reasonable person … conclude that the menu change endorsed the Muslim faith.The choice is neutral to religion. Several faiths prohibit the consumption of pork..." "Plaintiff has not alleged any facts or cited any law which suggest he has a constitutionally protected interest in eating pork as part of his prison diet...""Plaintiff's substantive due process claim is based on conduct alleged to be so severe that it shocks the conscience...To the contrary, Plaintiff objects to being treated the same as all other inmates. He does not allege he was denied pork while all other inmates were served this dish. Instead, he complains that all inmates are treated the same, regardless of whether they have a religious dietary restriction of this nature." [DR. CHAPS COMMENT: In other words, because the prison enforces Muslim Sharia law equally upon all prisoners, none of them face discrimination--they are all treated as Muslims equally, and forced to eat Muslim food equally, so Christians have no dietary rights.]

Folks, foreign Muslim Sharia law is being enforced in American courts, violating the U.S. Constitution, and establishing Islam as the mandatory religion upon Christians.

"The proposed law, SB 1360, had been opposed jointly and lobbied against by both CAIR (The Council on American Islamic Relations) and the ADL (the mostly Jewish Anti-Defamation League) ... American citizens must be allowed to question, without being called 'Islamophobes' or 'bigots,' the inherent threat of Islamic sharia ideology, disguised as only religious law, before it endangers our American society. The political correctness of this constitutional argument actually blinds one to the dangers of some Islamic laws...specifically those that pertain to women and children and the punishments rendered for breaking these laws...

"The 'sinister' fact is that Islamic ideology makes Muslim women and children powerless, intimidated by the obscene rules of a male-dominated society. Sharia law requires women to present practically impossible proof of their innocence, such as eyewitnesses to being raped. A woman who seeks justice for this crime, files for divorce, or desires child custody, or a child that strays into Western ways, has hardly any means to win in a sharia court...

"Caning and flogging in public are done in cases where a female is found guilty of a minor sexual infraction, and stoning to death for a wife's adultery is common in the Muslim world. Amputation of a hand or foot is considered an appropriate price for thievery, while beheading, crucifying, and hanging are the recommended penalties for murder or blasphemy. Children can also be harshly treated under sharia law by being forced to remain in the custody of an abusive father after there is a divorce.

"Killing in the name of 'family honor' is an accepted form of Islamic punishment for a woman's unfaithfulness or a Muslim child straying too far from the Islamic way..."

An atheist joker Ernest Perce dressed for a Holloween parade as the Muslim false prophet Muhammed. While walking in the parade the atheist joker was jumped and beaten by an easily offended Muslim man, Talaag Elbayomy. A video camera and eyewitness policeman captured the assault and testified for the atheist victim, who was physically beaten by the Muslim attacker, right here in the USA.The Muslim attacker was an immigrant who claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form. He also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet.But the U.S. judge was Muslim, so he threw out the video evidence, dismissed the eyewitness cop, lectured the victim for mocking Muhammed, and freed the violent Muslim attacker.Watch the 2 minute ABC News story here-->(and share it widely).The U.S. Judge said to the atheist: "I'm a Muslim, I find it offensive. But you have that right, but you're way outside your boundaries or first amendment rights. This is what, and I said I spent about 7 and a half years living in other countries...In many Arabic speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society."

Let me get this straight. An American Judge enforces foreign Sharia law rather than the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution? And this is happening in America?

Conservative Congresswoman Sandy Adams (R-FL) has taken a stand for liberty and to defend the U.S. Constitution and US law, by sponsoring a bill that stops liberal activist judges from enforcing Muslim Sharia law, or foreign laws, in American Courts. Adams wrote an op-ed article explaining her bill, saying in part:

"Imagine waking up one Sunday morning and reading the headline in your local newspaper: 'Supreme Court rules that the press can't question the president,' and imagine that their ruling cited international case law from nations like China or Cuba, where it is illegal to question the word of the executive branch. While this idea may seem far-fetched, it is a daunting possibility.

"Foreign law poses a very real threat to the American judicial system...Our Constitution laid the foundation for our nation's judicial system, and referencing or using foreign law in American courts will lead to its erosion...

"That is why I have introduced legislation to protect our Constitution and federal court systems from this type of practice. My two-page bill, H.R. 973, simply states that 'in any court created by or under Article III of the Constitution of the United States, no justice, judge, or other judicial official shall decide any issue in a case before that court in whole or in part on the authority of foreign law, except to the extent the Constitution or an Act of Congress requires the consideration of that foreign law.'

"Not only is using international precedent a transparent disregard for the Constitution, but it could be used to advance a judge's personal political agenda over the best interests of the nation. Judges have a responsibility to interpret the laws of the land, not legislate from the bench, and the practice of referring to foreign law puts their underlying motives into question. There are three particular Supreme Court cases where judges have cited foreign and international precedent: Lawrence v. Texas, where the court overturned state anti-sod omy statutes; Atkins v. Virginia, where the court held against the execution of mentally retarded capital defendants; and Roper v. Simmons, where the court outlawed application of the death penalty to offenders who were under 18 when their crimes were committed. International and foreign laws were cited in all three cases by our Supreme Court justices in reaching their decisions, setting precedent for future rulings..."

"This kind of practice begs the question: Are we going to allow our court systems to dictate our policymaking process based off of foreign sources or are we going to go through the proper channels prescribed by our Constitution? We must remember that we have an American judicial system in place for a reason; it is based off of our country's rich history and it is intentionally unique to our great nation. As we move forward as a country, we must work to protect it."

--Rep. Sandy Adams represents Florida's 24th Congressional District.

[Chaps comment: Let's stand with Congresswoman Sandy Adams, and petition all 535 Congressmen and Senators to co-sponsor and pass her bill to stop Sharia in US courts.]
God Bless you, in Jesus' name,
Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt, PhD

White House Threatens To Veto GOP Business Tax Cut

Apr 18, 2012 12:59 pmThe White House is threatening to veto an effort by House Republicans to cut taxes for millions of smaller businesses, calling it an unproductive giveaway to many of the country’s most profitable companies. The veto threat was issued Tuesday, two days before the GOP-run House is expected to approve the measure. Even without the veto [...]

Are You Tired Of Paying For Illegal Immigrants?

Apr 18, 2012 01:46 pmNow that you have written your check and sent the IRS some of your hard earned money to help feed Barack Obama’s regime, here’s a suggestion for what to do to fight back. Get behind the effort to pass Republican Congressman Lamar Smith’s Legal Workforce Act (LWA), HR 2885. This bill would amend the Immigration and [...]

Video: Tales From Fast And Furious: The Murder Of An American Citizen And Obama’s Radical Views On Guns

Apr 18, 2012 02:51 pm

Part 1 of a video series based on the recently published groundbreaking book Fast and Furious: Barack Obama’s Bloodiest Scandal and Its Shameless Cover-up by Katie Pavlich. This is the book that may blow the lid off of the Obama Administration’s covert plan to disarm America and may bring down the Obama Presidency. The murder [...]

Excerpt: In a bid to win independents, President Obama’s campaign is ramping up efforts to label Mitt Romney a hardcore conservative. Out is the emphasis on Romney as a centrist flip-flopper with “no core,” a tag useful for Democrats as they attempted to hurt Romney with Republican voters and lengthen the primary season.

Excerpt: Jesse Kelly won a special primary election in Arizona on Tuesday, securing the Republican nomination to replace former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.). Kelly, an Iraq War veteran and project manager, edged out three other Republicans all vying to finish the term of Giffords, who stepped down in January – one year after an assassination attempt in her Tucson, Ariz. district left her critically wounded.

Ted Nugent Defends Obama Remarks, Refers To

Himself As ‘Black Jew At A Nazi-Klan Rally’

Excerpts of comments made by rocker Ted Nugent during an interview at the National Rifle Association’s convention this past weekend, Apr 14, 2012:

"Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder [don’t] even like the Constitution. We got four Supreme Court justices who don’t believe in the Constitution.

If you want more of those kinds of evil anti-American people in the Supreme Court, then don’t get involved and let Obama take office again. Because I’ll tell you this right now: if Barack Obama becomes the president in November, again, I will either be dead or in jail by this time next year....

Newly recently released tax documents, examined and analyzed by Tina Trent of sorosfiles.com, reveal how billionaire "philanthropist" George Soros expanded his U.S.-based empire by using funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the Obama stimulus. Soros and Obama worked hand-in-glove through the stimulus, which has been called the largest single partisan wealth transfer in American history.

Republicans Sue Obama Over Recess AppointmentsBy Breitbart News Today, Senate Republicans hired Miguel Estrada, the 2002 judicial nominee for the DC Circuit Court of Appeals filibustered by Senate Democrats, to press a lawsuit against the Obama administration. The lawsuit itself is based on President Obama’s non-recess “recess appointment” of political allies to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which oversees management-union relations; it was originally filed by Noel Canning, a soft-drink business owner who sued the NLRB over its ruling that the company had to work with a labor union.Read the Full Story

State Supreme Court Justice Declares "Serious Questions" About Obama's Birth Certificate -- Now Tell EVERY Secretary of State AND Attorney General to REMOVE Obama From their Ballot:https://secure.conservativedonations.com/rm_eligibility/?a=7573ALERT: A Supreme Court Justice in Alabama has declared that, thanks to recent investigations into Barack Hussein Obama's alleged Constitutional ineligibility to be President of the United States,a filing that seeks to require an original copy of Obama's birth certificate before he would be allowed on the presidential ballot in November has raised "serious questions" about Obama's "birth certificate" -- and the possibility that it's a FORGERY.
Justice Tom Parker has filed a "special, unpublished concurrence" in the case arguing that Alabama citizen Hugh McInnish's charges of "forgery" were legitimate cause for concern, according to a report at WorldNet Daily!

"Obama’s lawyer, Alexandra Hill, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is 'irrelevant to his placement on the ballot.'"- Tea Party Tribune

You read that right! Barack Obama's own attorney actually conceded that his birth certificate is a forgery!

Mario Apuzzo, the attorney representing the parties who are challenging Obama, confirmed the contention with this blow-by-blow: "I called Brian Wilcox to testify as an internet image expert. Mr. Wilcox was going to testify on how the Obama April 27, 2011, long-form birth certificate has been altered and manipulated either by computer software or by a human or both, producing a forged documents, and that since the image is not reliable, we need to see the original paper version. Obama’s lawyer objected to my proffered testimony." [Emphasis Ours]

Call for Elections to be Halted, Government Seized

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor(UNEDITED TEXT BELOW)
Newsmax published it but pulled it quickly but not until it was sent to every senior member of Americas military. I got it from a former military intelligence officer. It has done the circuit there. The call I received, from a retired senior intelligence officer and former Defense Attache to Israel went like this, “Gordie, What do you think of this thing? There is only one way to read it, they are calling for the assassination of the president.” NewsMax is part of the stable of right wing publications in the Richard Mellon Scaife stable.
The title of the Newsmax column:

“OBAMA RISKS A DOMESTIC MILITARY INTERVENTION”

The piece itself isn’t reporting anything, its purpose is simple, it is advocating a military coup and the end of the United States of America as a free and democratic republic, using “weasel words” at times, and at times being as direct as a brick in the face. Newsmax makes a case, addressing the officer corps of the United States military, as to why our government has to be removed. Newsmax begins to make his case:

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible. Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”

A Message from Our Criminal Government: "We Got to Get Paid"The corporate controlled media has accurately reported Stanford's use of the fraudulently obtained money (e.g., purchasing mansions, jets, yachts, million dollar condominiums). However, the corporate controlled media conspicuously failed to report that much of the stolen money went to bribing corrupt members of the corporate controlled congress on both sides of the aisle. The illegally obtained money was given to the likes of Barack Obama, William Nelson, John McCain, John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid......http://www.newswithviews.com/Hodges/dave123.htm
by Dave Hudges