YOUR MAMAS NOTES: Recently rehabbed Stone Temple Pilots/Velvet Revolver lead singer Scott Weiland and his model mate Mary Forsberg have put their Sherman Oaks house on the market with an asking price of $2,250,000. Does this mean that the notoriously volatile and reportedly bi-polar parents of two have finally decided to go splitsville, or are they just looking for a little more square footage for their over-sized and well publicized emotional outbursts?

Property records show the comely couple only purchased the Sutton Street property from the very bizzy and tiny nosed actress Lindsay Price (Lipstick Jungle, Pepper Dennis, Beverly Hills 90210) in March of 2007 for $2,100,000. This was right about the same time the Missus Weiland went all kinds of crazy and got herself picked up by the po-po for setting fire to thousands of dollars worth of Mister Weiland's wardrobe on the front lawn of their damn house. It's unclear to Your Mama whether the sartorial bonfire took place at this house on Sutton Street or, as some reports indicated, at another residence a few miles away Toluca Lake.

Perhaps it should come as no surprise that listing information for the Weiland's 3,399 square foot three bedroom house is a wee bit confusing when it comes to determining the number of bathrooms. In the summary of the property three bathrooms are listed and in the description of the house it says 3.5 bathrooms plus and additional pooper in a detached guest unit. So for the sake of argument and until we hear from the Weiland'sterlitgurl, let's just say there are between 3 and 4.5 bathrooms.

The interior day-core of the Weiland residence, which include living and dining rooms as well as a large white kitchen and family room space, appear to have been all done up and did over in a Kelly Wearstler Hollywood Regency style. However, we sincerely doubt that MizWearstler is actually responsible for this hot mess because if she was it would be, well, better. And she certainly would have known better than to hang that too tiny crystal chandelier in a dining room aching for something large and dramatic.

As a side note, are the children loving watching that Top Design program on the boob-toob as much as Your Mama and the Dr. Cooter? We could care less what all those high-drama design queens are doing with their cubicles and bunkers, we just wanna see what kind of high-larious outfit and cockamamie coiffure MizWearstler is gonna show up with. If the executives at Bravo were smart, they'd get rid of all those wannabe Martha Stewarts and just film MizWearstler wandering around on a sound stage dressed like a damn peacock, picking at her nails and squinting at dust bunnies. Even better put her in a room with that dee-lishusly mean Nina Garcia ladee from Project Runway and see which bee-hawtcha is left standing at the end of the day. Now that would be some good damn reality television.

But we digress. Not only are both of the Weilands reported to be bi-polar, so is the exterior of this house. The front facade appears to be some sort of quasi-faux Mediterranean tract house with arched windows and some very complicated and visually perplexing iron balustrades, while the rear facade presents a more mid-century modern vibe with a simple hip roof and a large wall of windows overlooking the back yard swimming pool and the park like grounds beyond. We imagine the Weiland'sgardener curses them every week while he's having to maneuver the mower around those boulders set smack in the middle of the lawn.

A few flicks of the well worn bead on our bejeweled abacus reveal that the troubled twosome are likely to lose a few shekels on this real estate transaction, partick when you consider carrying costs.

Property records show that in June of 2008 Mister Weiland forked over $1,300,000 for a much more modest house on Ethel Street in a much less expensive section Sherman Oaks.

I think that this house is a whole way nicer than Tina Sinatra's and does seem very reasonably priced in comparison. I love those sloping celings and velux roof windows. The only drawback has to be those orange-covered chairs and the funny mouldings - makes the room look a James Bond set circa 1960.

There's less to fix on this one than Tina Sinatra's, but that's more of a back-handed compliment.

I hate that every wall is white, but paint is cheap. And I really loathe the decorative cutout between the living room and dining room. It's ugly (especially as it doesn't fit the aesthetic of the rest of the house) and useless. I'd far prefer to have actual book cases or cabinets for little objets d'art than something so impractical.

Based on the photos, nothing exceptional to start with, then burdened by clumsy remodels/additions. You could fix it, but that seems like it'd be a waste of time and money. Better to look for an updated house with a more cohesive design, or a cheaper fixer-upper you can do correctly.

The family room on the back screams "room addition" and, actually, looks like one of those cheesy patio enclosure-type rooms advertised so heavily in every Sunday supplement or TV magazine...I wonder if it's aluminum? The lattice patio cover looks like a Home Depot do-it-yourself project and the random lawn boulders gives the yard a somewhat lunar appearance. Overall, the place looks cheap.

This house has been on the market for several months. Original asking price was $2,395,000 according to Redfin

Nice street with a well proportioned lot for a house of this size (a rarity in SO these days)

This house would have been a lot easier to sale a couple of years ago. My problem with paying $2M for this house, and a lot of others I see in the area, is it's basically a tract house that's been spiffed up a bit. For $2M I want a new custom house, and not another Mediterranean cookie-cutter 5,000 sq ft house on a 6,000 sq ft lot.

Not only is the "architecture" schizophrenic AND bland, but the senseless, incoherent planes of the various ceilings does indeed scream "add on"; and on, and on, and on…

But those faux "Asian-style" room dividers are a crime that should bring back the whipping post in the town square; whatever were they thinking? The mirror between the kitchen & family room is ill-advised at best, the gable-end of which opens onto a claustrophobic deck smack up against the pool enclosure, there's a plasma over the fireplace in the master, and I still can't figure out which low-rent DIY store that thing on the floor at the foot of the tub is.

Don't know the area well enough to judge whether or not this is a candidate for tear down, but with all the crazy horizontal & vertical angles you'd be hard pressed to find one wall that stands true and not out-of-square.