CIA agent, Malcom Howard: "I brought down WTC 7"

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To Bring a building of that size down with explosives would take weeks of preparation. It's not like in a video game where you run around planting
dynamite sticks with timers attached onto walls and pillars.

Or one fire in the corner of the 13th floor....I don't know why demo companies bother....

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To Bring a building of that size down with explosives would take weeks of preparation. It's not like in a video game where you run around planting
dynamite sticks with timers attached onto walls and pillars.

Or one fire in the corner of the 13th floor....I don't know why demo companies bother....

Only it wasn't just one fire on the 13th floor was it. The Building had been extensively damaged by thousands of tons of steel and concrete from the
twin towers collapse.

In a couple of weeks the CIA will announce it has no person with this name in their records. A few days after that it will be revealed that he was in
a mental hospital on 9/11, or that he once confessed to being a JFK shooter, or something similar.

A quick search reveals that this story is ONLY being carried out by known hoax/fake news purveyors I can find nothing whatsoever elsewhere to support
it. Who did he allegedly give this confession to? Even the picture in the article is of some random old man not the person in question. There's even
the obligatory youtube video about it....sigh

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To Bring a building of that size down with explosives would take weeks of preparation. It's not like in a video game where you run around planting
dynamite sticks with timers attached onto walls and pillars.

The 79-year-old New Jersey native says he worked on the CIA operation they dubbed “New Century” between May 1997 and September 2001,

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To Bring a building of that size down with explosives would take weeks of preparation. It's not like in a video game where you run around planting
dynamite sticks with timers attached onto walls and pillars.

The 79-year-old New Jersey native says he worked on the CIA operation they dubbed “New Century” between May 1997 and September 2001,

originally posted by: prevenge
Thought I'd share this lil nugget thats been making its rounds across the net today...

79-year-old retired CIA agent, Malcom Howard, has made a series of astonishing claims since being released from hospital in New Jersey on Friday
and told he has weeks to live. Mr. Howard claims he was involved in the “controlled demolition” of World Trade Center 7, the third building
that was destroyed on 9/11.

“When the building came down, it was such a rush. Everything went exactly to plan. It was so smooth. Everybody was evacuated. Nobody was hurt in
WTC 7. We were celebrating. We kept watching replays of the demolition, we had the whiskey and cigars out, and then all of a sudden the strangest
thing happened. We all started to worry that it looked a bit too smooth. We watched the tape again and again and again and we started to get paranoid.
It looked like a controlled demolition. We thought #, people are going to question this. And then we heard that people from the street were reporting
that they heard the explosions during the afternoon. When we were told that the BBC botched their report and announced to the world that the building
collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did… At that point we really thought the gig was up.”

If this is true, then they're definitely serving this information out intentionally.

Interesting, 9/11 could be a double edged sword...
The first edge, the event, to get into the middle East...
The second edge, admitting to it.

That very information, that revelation, would be more powerful than the event itself, considering the amount of global backlash that would ensue...

Guess it's right on time for WWIII and the TPTB's retreat to the bunker cities...

This building was an intentional and fully authorised self-destruct......simple.

Of course they want this out now....lol.....the Mayor knew because he was a part of the process.

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To Bring a building of that size down with explosives would take weeks of preparation. It's not like in a video game where you run around planting
dynamite sticks with timers attached onto walls and pillars.

The 79-year-old New Jersey native says he worked on the CIA operation they dubbed “New Century” between May 1997 and September 2001,

Four years long enough for ya?

4 years is plenty, but for what. Insurance fraud?

Insurance fraud was an anticipated sympathetic byproduct of a multi-pronged intention behind the bigger picture action.This building was
pre-wired...intentionally by the Government as SOP......ALL buildings that went down are keystone waypoints hidden within the tapestry of the bigger
picture.

Its interesting how when something that is obviously "fake news" is going to go towards confirming that confirmation bias then its floated around ATS
like the Gosbel yet if its from CNN then its fake news.

Yournewswire is fake news, yet we seem to be very selective about what we actually treat as fake news if it fits in with our preconceived beliefs.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Its interesting how when something that is obviously "fake news" is going to go towards confirming that confirmation bias then its floated around ATS
like the Gosbel yet if its from CNN then its fake news.

Yournewswire is fake news, yet we seem to be very selective about what we actually treat as fake news if it fits in with our preconceived beliefs.

It is an "if the shoe fits wear it" data acceptance scenario......people no longer trust nor validate MSM.....they now use multi-media conduits to
form their perspectives ....in the past MSM brainwashed us all......now they impact substantially fewer people.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Its interesting how when something that is obviously "fake news" is going to go towards confirming that confirmation bias then its floated around ATS
like the Gosbel yet if its from CNN then its fake news.

Yournewswire is fake news, yet we seem to be very selective about what we actually treat as fake news if it fits in with our preconceived beliefs.

You can't expect people to not believe things like this when every level of government and media has been caught time and again lying.
What do you expect to happen?

Besides, if it weren't for those towers we couldn't protect our freedom in the middle east. No one knows how our freedom got there, but by god we
gotta protect it!

The big conspiracy is, she was pregnant, that means her newest child would have been a Billionaire muslim, brother of the king of England. If you
think Old Phillip would allow that I have a bridge to sell you.

So.. CNN and other MSM that typically just give a slant to stories to further an agenda are "fake news" ('cause Trump said so), but.. this ridiculous
site that has published dozens of hoax articles is somehow legit? And so it goes with ATS, pushing the boundaries of ludicrous on a daily basis.

I shall tell you why shall I, they were NOT going to have Dodi Al Fayad married to the mother of the future king of England and I have my own opinion
were the order came from but let's just say head of the establishment.

It was not just in one rag mate it was in all of them and by the way most British people believe it even despite the whitewash cover up by the
crook's in charge - except died in the wool royalists whom mistakenly probably believed Diana was a traitor when in fact she had MORE royal blood than
the Windsor's, at least MORE BRITISH royal blood from the house of Stuart from which she was descended and a little less of that imported house of
Hanover blood, it was probably why she was chosen in the first place but once she had given birth to a male heir old Charlie was off after his old
flame, her being married and old and wrinkly not withstanding but you see Camilla also has more royal blood as she is descended from a king of England
and his mistress.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.