Welcome to the Orioles Nation Forums! Like most online communities, you must register to post on our message board. However, posting is free--it always will be--and registration is a simple process. Become part of the growing Orioles Nation community and register now!

LA Detective wrote:JJ,Strop, Patton,Oday,Hunter, and then several good candidates including Ayala and Wada when ready..

I see the Orioles trading Ayala. I see the bullpen as:

Steve Johnson (RH) and Wada (LH) (Pomerantz if he's not ready coming out of ST) as the long men and spot startersPatton, O'Day, Hunter, Strop, and Jim Johnson as the short men. There just isn't a place for Ayala, and Hunter is a MUCH better choice.

Steve Johnson (RH) and Wada (LH) (Pomerantz if he's not ready coming out of ST) as the long men and spot startersPatton, O'Day, Hunter, Strop, and Jim Johnson as the short men. There just isn't a place for Ayala, and Hunter is a MUCH better choice.

I could see the O's keeping him for depth. Wada may not be ready and Pomeranz may need some tuning up before heading back to the majors. Last year was an exception, but everybody knows how fast a bullpen can deplete.

When do we have to pick up/decline his option? Are we allowed to send him to the minors? Well, hopefully, the situation works itself out. Its a good problem to have. We can always pick up the option and trade him.

ofahn wrote:Except that we don't NEED him in the bullpen (unless we COMPLETELY lose our minds and release Patton) and intend on having him return to Norfolk to finish his development as a SP.

I would scrap this starting pitcher idea with Matusz. He is not cut out to be a starter but he would make one helluva late inning guy. I think too many people are in love with this idea that he is going to be a big time starter. I just don't see it happening. The guy has found a home and his presence there makes this bullpen absolutely devestating - with or without Patton

birdwatcher55 wrote:I would scrap this starting pitcher idea with Matusz. He is not cut out to be a starter but he would make one helluva late inning guy. I think too many people are in love with this idea that he is going to be a big time starter. I just don't see it happening. The guy has found a home and his presence there makes this bullpen absolutely devestating - with or without Patton

Matusz has already pitched a FULL season in the majors as a starter and was very successful. He's proven he can succeed as a starter, no? Now he has confidence and his stuff looks crisp again.

Why are you so against giving him another shot at starting? If he struggles, move him back to the bullpen.

Jordan Tuwiner wrote:Matusz has already pitched a FULL season in the majors as a starter and was very successful. He's proven he can succeed as a starter, no? Now he has confidence and his stuff looks crisp again. Why are you so against giving him another shot at starting? If he struggles, move him back to the bullpen.

I don't think he has the mental toughness and stamina to be a starter. But as a spot reliever, he is totally lights out. Just my two cents

Jordan Tuwiner wrote:Matusz has already pitched a FULL season in the majors as a starter and was very successful. He's proven he can succeed as a starter, no? Now he has confidence and his stuff looks crisp again.

Why are you so against giving him another shot at starting? If he struggles, move him back to the bullpen.

He's never pitched a full season with an ERA under 4.30 as a starter. Not sure how a 4.30 ERA is "very successful". He did have a very successful finish to his 2010 season but not a full season.