As I indicated elsewhere I would post some comments to your site. I will try to keep to be respectful of your time. My intent is not for protracted discussion, but to make sure I represent your work correctly.

Do you believe genetically engineered products evidence CSI by Dembski's definition? Here is a case were potentially non-algorithmically compressible information is CSI. This would refute your paper's claim that Dembski confuses what you call SAI and CSI. It seems to also a misinterpretation Mark Perakh also makes.

I would actually argue that there is an overlap between objects exhibiting SAI and CSI, but in actuality they are not the same. Some forms of SAI are a subset of CSI.