Mitchell’s central deception is the one News Corp has perpetrated continually for more than ten years. He falsely claimed former Prime Minister Julia Gillard set up a “slush fund” for her then boyfriend, Bruce Wilson, an official with the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU), who used it for illegal transactions.

Mitchell wrote:

‘Gillard, a partner at Slater and Gordon in Melbourne at the time, had been romantically involved with Wilson since 1992 and had helped to set up the AWU Workplace Reform Association, which was registered as a fund for training workers.’

This is false. The Workplace Reform Association (WRA) was registered as an incorporated association, not as a fund. Its bank account was the fund.

As has been proven at the Trade Union Royal Commission (TURC), Ms Gillard did not set up any bank account for Wilson or anyone else. She only helped incorporate the association.

‘The review found nothing which contradicted the information provided by Ms Gillard at the time’

The distinction between the two entities was clarified at the TURC on Wednesday, 10 September 2014, when counsel assisting the Commission, Jeremy Stoljar SC, quoted from a 1995 interview with Gillard and Slater & Gordon partners, Peter Gordon and Geoff Shaw:

“ ... the account belonging to an incorporated association by the same name which was incorporated by Slater & Gordon ...”

[page774]

Clearly, the fund belongs to the association; they are not the same thing.

Stoljar confirmed the distinction with this question:

“He [Peter Gordon] is referring to an account quite separate from the Association; correct?”

Gillard responded:

“When you look across this discussion with Mr Gordon and Mr Shaw, there's a discussion about the Workplace Reform Association; there's a discussion then about bank accounts ... I didn't know anything about the banking arrangements of the AWU Workplace Reform Association.”

Gillard has reinforced this testimony multiple times through the course of News Corp’s tawdry campaign against her:

I have been defamed on a number of occasions with forms of words saying that I set up a fund or a bank account. Those defamations have been apologised for and retracted on a number of occasions. Despite that, those kinds of references are now littered through media coverage of all sorts: electronic, print and radio.

I did not set up a fund. I did not set up a bank account. Any such claim about me is a defamatory claim.

Mitchell used the term “slush fund” eight times in Monday’s piece. Not once did he distinguish the bank account from the association.

The second falsehood is here:

‘In fact, [AWU official Ralph] Blewitt spoke for 18 minutes to 2GB host Alan Jones that same week about what exactly he, Wilson and Gillard did do, once again admitting his own crimes.’

Not true. In the Jones interview on 28 May, Blewitt admitted being the WRA secretary and carrying cash from Perth to Melbourne. There was no admission of any criminal activity.

He mentioned “secret commissions” several times, but without specifying sources, destinations or individuals involved.

When Blewitt was charged in Western Australia in March last year on 31 charges of fraud, he pleaded not guilty.

Evidence of any criminal conduct was deemed so weak by Western Australian and Victorian police that all charges were dropped last month.

Mitchell’s third falsehood is that

‘Gillard left her employment [with law firm Slater & Gordon] in 1995 over her work for Wilson.’

Repeated countless times by News Corp publications, this is a malicious concoction, as shown by the testimony of former Slater & Gordon (S&G) partner Bernard Murphy, now Justice Murphy, other S&G partners and Julia Gillard herself. This is confirmed by documents presented to the TURC.

The reality is that, in June 1995, Gillard nominated for a Senate seat with the Australian Labor Party. The first indication that anything was amiss regarding S&G clients Wilson and Blewitt arose “between 8 August and some date in early September” in 1995, as Justice Murphy testified at the Royal Commission.

Gillard was then found by an internal S&G review in September 1995 to have acted appropriately at all times.

‘The review found nothing which contradicted the information provided by Ms Gillard at the time in relation to the AWU/Bruce Wilson allegations and which she has stated consistently since the allegations were first raised.’

“Mr McClelland has subsequently said about that contribution that it wasn't a reference to me or my conduct.”

The sixth falsehood is this:

'Yet Gillard had a damaging stain on her record.’

No, she didn’t. None of the tawdry allegations made against her in the course of News Corp’s venomous campaign has been shown to have a shred of supportive evidence.

It did in Australia. After News Corp papers started a campaign, this was the then Opposition Leader when Julia Gillard was Prime Minister. He later went on to be one of the most destructive PM's in history. pic.twitter.com/kENbbj6owo

Ashbygate Book

Support IA

Recent Comments

Special Features

About Us

Independent Australia is a progressive journal focusing on politics, democracy, the environment, Australian history and Australian identity. It contains news and opinion from Australia and around the world. [ read more ]