True, Angie has called me an "evil monster" who spends most of my time "slamming women like Sam Bennett" A sexist, too. So why thank her?

I'm remarkable, too!

Is Angie really a Stepford wife? Her post today is pretty much identical to the comment that Villa himself posted here at 8:07 AM on Sunday. It's virtually the same as a comment posted by Villa at LVPoliblog. So I think he inserted a chip somewhere under that hat she likes to wear.

In Angie's (that's Mrs Dottie's real name) very first post, written before that implant was inserted, she makes this bold statement: "I'd like to set the stage for a blog where good manners are encouraged and opposing points of view are welcome. You don't have to be on "my team" to be part of the discussion."

Actually, you do.

In an email to bloggers Michael Donovan, Michael Molovinsky and AJ Cordi dated August 10, Villa ominously warns, "You're either with me or against me. Pick a side and be done with it."

Sounds like George Bush, the mother of all neocons.

Sadly for "Mrs. Dottie," a happy blog that once really did encourage diversity and good manners has devolved into a moderated blog that instead promotes a boycott of Ramblings.

So much for all that "healthy dissent" Angie and her husband falsely encourage. The only dissent they permit is when it comes from them. She's clearly enabling her husband's obvious mental illness.

First thing Sunday morning, they could not wait to get out of bed to check the weekly ratings. Seeing that I had dropped for #2 to #4, they were delighted. They must have been really pissed when I jumped from #4 to #2 a few weeks before that.

I hope they keep it up. People are never more interested in something than when someone tells them they can't have it. I'm sure it will encourage artsy-fartsy types to read my blog. Maybe I'll write about a museum or something.

Mr. O'Hare's flip-flop on the Villa matter is a slap in the face to his readers, his profession, and the memory of a 25-year-old woman who just wanted to go home. After fancying himself a keeper of the torch of truth and integrity for so long, and to the extent that he eventually found himself championing the Villas' cause, this reversal in thinking and aggressive behavior is a profound obscenity. Not to mention that his apparent hop into bed with the DA-friendly Morning Call looks like a confederacy of weaklings. Anybody home, Allentown? Feel like moving even farther away.

IT is amazing that O'Hare is doing EXACTLY the same kind of bullshit that he decried a while back. Back then, "Team Casey" was slinging shit at him. Now look at O'Hare. He's all grown up. He's a shit-slinging rube who can't even be honest about the picture he uses has his avatar.

"You thought Angie wrote it and erroneously based your whole "Troll Parade" entry (and wholesale slam of my wife Angie) on the mistaken premise that Angie wrote it on my behalf.

"Read my lips, and try to follow this: I wrote it."

There's one problem with your tough guy talk and Bushisms - you deceptively allowed readers to believe that your wife wrote that blog. She allowed you to continue in that deception, enabling you.

You posted your blog as "Mrs. Dottie" instead of under your own name and were forced to make the embarrasing admission, at least here, that it was actually you.

Are you going to continue to deceive your readers at LVSomebody? You have made no effort to inform them that toxic waste actually came from you and not Mrs. Dottie. She made no effort to clarify that either. Being dishonest with your readers is no way to keep them.

All those comments from Captain Beefheart and others are obviously you, but how many actual posts have you written?

I understand you don't respect me, but how about your readers? Don't you respect them enough to be honest with them? Don't you realize that when you post under another name, you are being deceptive? Doesn't your wife realize this is a deceptive practice, too?

It's actually very demeaning to your own readers.

How often do you do this? How many posts have you written as "Mrs. Dottie?" Do you send emails as Angie, too? Do you put on women's clothing, too? Be honest, are you in high heels and fishnet stockings right now?

"as I'm sure you can understand, any "Geneva Convention-type" rules of blogging that might normally apply will and should get tossed right out the window in the name of self-defense:"

Mrs. Dottie, Let me get this straight. You justify deceiving the readers of LVSomebody bc you are at war with me? I don't think your readers will appreciate being abused in such a fashion. If you can't be honest with them about who you are, then what can you be honest with them abut? Whay should they believe a word that you write, whether as Mrs. Dottie, Mr. Pottie, Pat Wallace, Captain BeekJerky or whatever?

So now you are questioning people's manhood? that is interesting, seeing as you don't have any of your own to question.

I think you slam Sam Bennett because she has bigger balls than you. I think you slam Mrs. dottie for the same.

You are not a pathetic excuse for a man O'Hare, you aren't even a pthetic excuse for a human. You are a pathetic excuse for a life form. Maggots are higher on the evolutionary scale.

So what's your next blog going to be, one dedicated to getting help for people who don't agree with you?

I hear your traffic isn't whatit once was. So only 10 people are reading you, instead of 15? And those ten are only checking comments 50 times a day instead of 100? It's nothing but meaningless BS. You attach importance to it because it is the center of your minuscale little world, A universe where 99.999999999999% of the population will never visit, and don't give a damn. We live in reality, we occasionally visit your disturbing world, but I wouldn't stay too long, it might be contagious.

Ok King, understood. Hell, it's your blog, you and your wife can do whatever you want (including having long conversations btw/ yourselves and made-up names) - now stop accusing Bernie (or anyone else) of what you do.

It's not nice to lie to your readers. When are you going to tell them Bill Villa is posting as Mrs. Dottie? How often do you do this? When you can't be honest about who you are, why should people believe a word you say?

These are the excellent questions that deserve to be answered. I didn't notice that elitist Club 54 remark, but thanks for pointing that out.

That's a "joke" just like your shots at MM were a joke until . . . they weren't.

as a relatively neutral outsider, i can tell you it is still the most influential political blog in the valley.

and Mr. Villa, it is also obvious, and has been for months, that you have issues. please seek help. do not honor the memory of your remarkable daughter by becoming a bitter, vindictive zealot. i doubt she would have wanted that.

Thanks for the nice words. Actually, there are a few very good blogs out there. At one time, one of them was LVSomebody. But as Bill or Mrs. Dottie or whatever he/she is, has deteriorated, so has that blog.

If a blogger is already out there and discloses his identity, it becomes a very deceptive practice from him to post under other names or anonymously. That practice demonstrates a contempt for the reader. I used to really enjoy reading LVSomebody and all the different comments. It was refreshing, and Mrs. Dottie seemed to have the right attitude.

Now I don't know whether I was reading Mrs. Dottie or the other Mrs. Dottie. I don't know how many of the comments there came from other people or how many they themselves posted under assumed names or anonymously.

I find the practice demeaning.

Villa is using advertising techniques in the blogosphere. He should try the truth. But he is so mixed up, he no longer knows what the truth is.

Ironically, Mrs. Dottie or Bill or whoever he/she is, condemns me for doing precisely what he does with increasingly reckless abandon.

I don't post under assumed names or anonymously. I never have. I could see the use of an assumed name as a literary device, but would disclose that to my readers.

"The Banker" and all the other regulars on my blog are real people. I happen to know who The banker is bc he has emailed me. Not surprisingly, he actually is a banker. I am flattered at the accusation that I can be as even as someone like him or as knowledgeable as Pete or as logical as Consigliere. But in truth, I'm not.

It actually is those people, the occasional elected official, and other bloggers like AJ or Dave Najarian, who make my blog good. Even the bloggers who regularly disagree with me and tell me I'm full of it, improve the final product.

It's called healthy debate.

This blog is designed for the very few people out there intent on disrupting healthy debate, the trolls.

In some cases, they have allowed hatred of me to color their judgment. In others, it is jealousy, hard as that may be to believe. It is really just a very small blog, not even in the top 100,000.

In Villa's case, he is sick. He needs help, and I will not allow myself to be used by him to pursue a vendetta against anyone. We all sympathize with his loss. I never criticized his son. I have criticized him and his wife/husband.

On my own blog, I have a good and increasing readership. In fact, it has increased even more during the time Villa/Mrs. Dottie has started his ridiculous boycott.

As an advertising guru, he/she should know that publicly paying attention to something just gives it traction. Two of that blog's last three posts have been about me. Although he is attacking me, he is also directing people my way.

In fact, he violates his own boycott, carefully checking to see who is commenting. He might be reading it more closely than I do.

As far as BNN ratings are concerned, I wrote a blog about how to game the system. I don't think my stats bear any resemblance to reality, but they sure annoy some people. For that reason alone, I'll keep them posted.

He's a mess.

As far as the "This was written by Bill Villa (Mr. Dottie" comment is concerned, he just added now, around 9:30 AM, after Villa/Mrs. Dottie had already deceived his readers for well over a day. There is no "correction" or "addendum". Now he is trying to deceive people into believing it was there all along.

"read the 46 comments at our "Sound Matters" post. Sure, many are from Angie and me responding to commenters. But notice how many of the comments are from people you can track because we've included their web sites."

That's nice, if it's the truth. But who can believe a word that Mrs. Dottie/ Vila says anymore. It's all about manipulation in his case.

Anon 958am, Villa will never acknowledge your existence (nor mine). He can't or else he'd have to acknowledge that there are people besides Bernie, AJ and Michael Molovinsky who disagree w/ him and he can't tolerate or comprehend that possibility. You see, he's a remarkable person but not that remarkable.

Villa, in a comment at 9:59, claims I posted surreptitiously as "Bill Villa" in a predecessor blog and deceived people about that "for weeks."

Yet another lie from a person who is quite pathological about it.

I did is take Villa's own remarks and post them here. At the time I did it, I made it clear to readers that I was doing it, and not someone else.

In other words, I was honest with readers. People reading those comments were told, at the time they were being posted, that I was taking some of the outrageous comments made by Villa and posting them here, on the troll blog, where they belong.

In fact, all those comments still exist, right here. Villa deliberately lies when he maintains there was some deception.

I don't deceive readers. I may get things wrong, but have enough respect for my readers to tell them the truth.

Note the "Uncle Grinny" comment. That's just one of many pseudonyms Villa deceptively uses. It's really insulting to readers.

I agree completely that blog readership and comments have no correlation.

But people stop reading blogs that arere dishonest. Your blog is dishonest because you mislead readers about who is actually posting what, are obsessed wit ha vendetta, and post anonymously and under pseudonyms. People get tired of you.

I see plenty of comments from Uncle Grinny or Captain Beefheart, but most of your regulars are gone.

And it's a shame.

I liked what your wife was doing but you ruined it in your quixotic quest against whomever.

i have for the most part, refrained from commenting on this venue. for the record, i am not a team member of bernie's, nor do i belong to any team or group. i did comment yesterday morning on bernie's posting about censorship/villa's. villa in turn, commented on his blog, that in addition to "turning" against him, i have also turned against the chen art group and even the house of chen restaurant. i support both the art group and the restaurant, and even villa's petition to harrisburg about his "case", but not villa's personal attacks on his "enemies." there is something morally wrong to imply that people who didn't support his "blogger tuesday" boycott, or his argument with bernie about anonymous comments, don't respect his grieving as a father; or worse, to imply they support the killer of his daughter.

Blatant lie after blatant lie. I have never seen anyone use "uncle grinny" except you. It is no alter ego of mine.

When I posted your comments on this blog, I made it very clear to my readers, at the time that I was doing it, that I was doing it. Those comments have been preserved on this blog and anyone who looks at them will see that you are being dishonest . . . yet again.

You keep repeating lies, easily disproved. Is it any wonder that no one believes your assertions about Martin?

Mike's comment is very calm and rational. He points out how you have twisted things to suit your purpose. People reading this blog recognize that you're doing this and thus, you are quickly losing any credibility you may have had.

This is very unfortunate, because if DA Martin purposely tried to shield his buddy's son from proper prosecution, then your lack of credibility will hurt your ability to fight that. As it stands, I have read your claims and thought there might be some validity to them. However, when I come on here and witness the way you twist the words and actions of Mike Molovinsky, Bernie O'Hare and Dave Najarian then I have to wonder what 'facts' you are twisting when you describe the actions of Martin.

I have never gone through something as painful as losing a child. I don't know how I would react, so I will try to give you the benefit of the doubt when it comes to Martin. You've levied serious charges and to be taken seriously, you need to be careful with the way you relay 'facts.'

As it stands, you're not doing so well. You're twisting things and calling people pro-Sheena killers simply because they won't do as you say. You are not hurting Bernie and the others by doing this, because any rational person can see through this. The person you are hurting is yourself because it undermines your credibility.

Previously, I did not understand why the Morning Call refused to meet with you. However, your behavior with respect to this blogger fight has made it clear that you are behaving crazily. That might explain their refusal.

My heart goes out to you for the loss of your daughter. I hope that you are able to channel your grief in a way that makes the world a better place.

I perceived this blog to be a conduit for you to speak your mind without hijacking all of the topics on the other boards, which I personally witnessed several times.

You are not 'winning' anything here. Your posts here are making you lose credibility. For example, you say Attorney (for now) Nigerian. I read his blog and there is nothing he did that would cause him to lose his license to practice. But, you write it as if there is legitimacy in your threat. Now you are accusing the Morning Call of hiring Bernie O'Hare.

Then you keep saying, "Look what I've done to your hired gun." What have you done? You've written nothing here that discredits what Bernie has written. People may disagree with him creating this blog, and if so, they came to that conclusion on their own, through no help of yours. You have only succeeded in making yourself look like a nutjob. And that is a shame.

Please, get yourself together!

Also, why do I see a reply here from the Banker "siding" with Bill Villa. If he is "siding" with Villa and honoring Villa's request for a boycott, then why did the Banker make a reply (which I tended to agree with) to a topic on Lehigh Valley Ramblings?

To Anon 2:56. I am not Bernie O'Hare. I am a parent who reads his blog.

When Bill Villa came onto Lehigh Valley Ramblings, I immediately recalled the accident in which his daughter was horribly killed on her 25th birthday by a drunk driver. I remember feeling terrible for him after he explained the difficulty he had in getting the drunk driver properly prosecuted.

What I see now, though, is a man filled with grief (caused by a tragedy which I cannot begin to imagine) who is shooting himself in the foot by twisting the words of people who really shouldn't matter to him at all. I fail to see how Bernie O'Hare, Mike Molovinsky, and David Najarian have anything to do with the supposed injustice perpretated by DA Jim Martin.

I repeat: if Jim Martin is guilty of what Bill Villa accuses him of, then Bill Villa would be better served by letting the true facts speak for themselves instead of getting mired into a blog war that does nothing to further his cause.

I don't know if there are outright lies, but there are definitely many, many instances where Bill has twisted things to suit his purpose.

I do have sympathy for Bill Villa. I don't know how I would react if I was in his shoes. I would hope, however, that when someone disagreed with me on something that I would not resort to saying things like this:

You 4 guys are the best friends a grieving father who lost his only daughter could ever hope to have.

I find it very distasteful that Bill Villa uses his dead daughter to bully people into thinking his way. This is not an instance where people are disagreeing on whether or not his daughter's killer should go to jail. I thought this whole argument was because he wants you and others to disassociate yourself with the Morning Call completely. Or do I have that wrong?

anon 5;14, you have it correct. this whole commotion began when villa decided that those who participate with "blogger tuesday" were abetting the morning call's topix forum which some criticized as a hate forum. i realized villa was using "blogger tuesday" as a hammer against the morning call, as part of his primary vendetta against the morning call and martin. in my case, villa also cried disloyalty, because he and the mrs. defended me last year against lvpoligblog. the troll parade was begun because villa was highjacking blogs with endless comments and insults. for them(it's both of them) to now insert the loss of his daughter into the fray is improper. this loss has always been behind villa's motives in everything he does, but it was NOT behind other people's decisions and their right to choose where to blog and interact. he has combined being a grieving father and the other issues, in complete disregard to other people. it is an unfortunate, intimidating situation, and Bernie, to his credit, stood up to it. most of us, myself included, skirt around the discomfort zone.

I have absolutely no respect left for him or his wife. I'll give you one of very many reasons.

There's a young man out there, AJ. He's quite a gifted writer with a very lucid style. He's even done some reporting. He'd like to be a teacher. He works long hours at a local store and from there it's off to school. I don't know when he sleeps.

AJ was very saddened by Bill's situation. He wrote about it, and proudly displayed a "Sheena Squad" emblem on his blog.

When Michael, Bill and I first began experiencing difficulties, AJ was not even in the loop. In fact he had no idea what the hell was going on and really, had a number of other more pressing matters on his plate. But Bill was furious at AJ because AJ did not jump to his defense.

I guess the Sheena Squad must be something like NATO.

Well, Bill began harrassing him with email after email. I know AJ had to write to him 4 times to ask to be left alone.

Villa, however, continues to taunt him. Just today, he calls AJ the "world's oldest law student."

AJ is a baby, just like Villa's daughter was a baby. I'm sure Villa would be outraged, and rightly so, if someone called his daughter the "world's oldest dance student." But he seems to think he can abuse kids whose only crime is to have been tangentially involved in this mess.

He really is a bully.

Another example is Dave Najarian, who is being libelled repeatedly by Villa with his wife's blessings. (I hope they've kept up on their home insurance payments). Dave and I have a J.D. in common. WE both blog. I am a former marathoner and he currently is in training. We share some passions. But we've never even met. He and I are likely to disagree much more often than we agree on given issues. The only time we've exchanged emails is when Villa began taunting him.

But Dave made one mistake. When Villa, a bully who loves to threaten people, became the 7,568th person to threaten me with a lawsuit, Najarian told him that if he thinks he has grounds, he should just sue. He posted a comment on a hijacked blog after I thought, mistakenly, that I had turned off comments. Villa immediately concluded that I had called on Dave to make this statement, and Dave became one of the bad guys for what really was my mistake.

Now, Najarian is a soon to be former lawyer, etc.

Molovinsky, who really is a softie despite his curmudgeonly exterior, really went out of his way for the Villas, finding them a building in A-town that they could use for their art shows. And Molovinsky's photography reveals that he's something of an artist himself.

He, too, committed the sin of thinking he could be friends with the Villa. When he refused to go along with them, everything he did was bc he has mayoral aspirations. he was physcially threatened as well.

Villa, in pursuit of a vendetta against me, has actually gone so far as to scroll through my comments to find readers who provide email addresses and has sent them emails asking them to stop reading my blog.

All of this is a tremendous waste of energy. All of this is very negative and destructive. None of this will bring his daughter back.

I stayed out of this for awhile. This post is likely to bring some inane wrath again, no doubt. Again I warn all, especially BV, you are responsible for your words. Don’t be dumb!

It is true, my involvement started after I posted on BO’s blog, a rather neutral statement, if one thinks he or she is harmed, the person should just sue. Threatening a suit has no merit. Anyone can threaten that. That was the crux of my statement. Rather neutral I might add.

Right quickly I was lambasted in an email from BV, whose skin you are kissing here and where on Bernie's body that skin is located. But we will take your advice and stop talking about suing Bernie's ass to the wall and just do it. We'll see you in court, etc.

WTF?

Thereafter I was bombarded with . . . pussy, incompetant no-good attorney back stabbing weasel and so forth, incessantly very public in the local blogosphere.

So I put up a blog. Get this filth of my web page. Yet, let the guy get his jollies, let him post there. Again with the caveat, he will be responsible for his words.

Funny, the guy called it a shameful blog, yet he advertised the so-called shameful blog on his own blog. He invited people to read it! The words are his own. Just like here. Blows that theory!

He can write what he wants, but no one else can. Its Bills rules!

Dare one delete any one of his posts, any post, then you’re squelching his dissent! So why not give him his own blog!

Yet, I took the blog down after a third party or two suggested it might send the him over the edge. Yet I understand why BO kept his up. It’s a case of darned if one do, darned if one don’t

BV actually asked me to leave the first blog up, I guess so he could complain victim and more. Who knows. These are BV’s rules. I deleted the blog and hoped it would end.

It didn't

Next, I was threatened to meet him in person. If I didn’t agree to meet him in person, he will “come after me legally and otherwise”

Hmmm, whats with the “or otherwise” part?

When I did not agree to meet him, he wrote he’ll “come after me with both barrels.”

Since then I’ve laid low, the libelous “attorney for now” stuff continues all over the web. What a bunch of bull!

Hey, Bill, my advice is the unchanged. I’m not terrified of you. If you think you’ve been unfairly harmed, sue my butt. You’ll see a counterclaim you’ll pray for that Dram shop recovery. That is if you haven’t squandered that case with this nonsense.

And the harassment with your threats of harm and extortion, that’s criminal!

Bogus lawsuits and threats of that, its called abuse of process and barratry, Look it up. Ask your attorney to help you.

But don’t expect ole Jim Martin to help you. And don’t bother writing the Judges in Lehigh County, you’ve already done that beyond invitation! Maybe you'll need a change of venue!

Don’t bother emailing/phone/writing/speaking or communicating with me. I want no contact with you. Your communication merely goes into the file, evidence in any case. Should anything happen to me, “legally or otherwise" Whatever that means.

Get help. That’s all we ask. Thats the most important thing.

And cut with the roaming floor foaming mouth junk, the routine is quite old.

whats really despicable is Mike Molovinskli calling for a Boycott of House of Chen.

I thought molivinskli was fighting FOR the owners of downtown stores? Now he's BOYCOTTING THEM ALL?!What's with how these "friends of bernie" change their mids and change sides its like there stepford wives or something--whats next Nigerian changing into a man?

A dram shop case is a claim against a bar owner for serving alcohol to person known to be intoxicated at the time. The claim is usually made by a third party who was injured by the intoxicated person. Nothing is anonymous on the internet. Every computer leaves its unique MediaAccess Control address or "MAC" address, a unique identifier which ishard wired to an IC chip in every NIC card.

No one need send anything to anyone. I did not. Yet this person announced this stuff, posted and emailed the world compulsively for the past year or two. He wrote and advertised it on his own blog. By his own admission, he emailed sitting Judges, public officials, the Bar Association, everyone! I'm sure any parties to his case have this. Like I said, we're all responsible for our words. We cant protect BV from BV. He needs help. I hope he gets it.

It would be real tragic for all those nasty threats and bullying, some of it on Villa's own blog, to fall into the right - I mean wrong - hands.

Villa has certainly given none of us any reason to want to interfere with his attempts to benefit financially from the tragedy of his daughter's death, has he? He's not the sort of person who makes idle threats about suing this person and that, is he? He's not someone who would make fun of a college student while expecting a jury to award him damages, is he? He's not the sort of person who wishes the DA would explode while eating a stake sandwich, is he?

And a jury could take his word to the bank. He would not do something dishonest like posting under all sorts of fake names, is he? He would never mislead anyone with false information, would he?

Dave, do you happen to have the name of the attorney representing the defendants in that dramshop case? I'll try and make sure this information does not fall into that lawfirm's hands.

As I recall them, Mr. Villa's allegations of prosecutorial favoritism pertain to two criminal cases that both ended over a year ago. None will be germane to civil litigation, if there is civil litigation, and attorney Najarian should and likely does know this. Through his public threats and attempts at intimidation, attorney Najarian, in addition to displaying a pettiness and immaturity that is alarming, is in fact digging himself deeper into the jeopardy hole he already has himself dug into via conduct highly unbecoming an attorney in launching this offensive blog site in the first place. I hope Mr. Villa follows through in reporting attorney Najarian's activities to the proper authority. It is my opinion that attorney Najarian will likely be suspended or possibly disbarred.

I've made no threat. I have not threatened to forward these communications to anyone. I've not forwarded these posts to either party's lawyer. I've not communicated with either. I've also not commented on his case, other than to say that I hope he had not squandered his dram shop case.

Yet, as an outside unrelated observer, reading his comments, I'd have every right to comment on his case, civil or criminal. My rights to free speech are no less because I am a lawyer! How many lawyers are talking right now about OJ Simpson. Lets disbar every one!

Or are you suggesting that one class is less entitled to speak on issues of the day than another class! That sounds just like BV! A bunch of elitist hooey!

There is no need for me to foward these comments to anyone. BV has done that for himself. If someone also did it, well whoopie. Resposibility falls to the speaker, not the postman! Geez!

And yes, credibility, mental condition and statements of a party are ALWAYS an issue in every civil case.

Villa should do what I first suggested. I invited him to delete his comments, just as I deleted the first blog (He asked me to leave it up no-less!)

I'm sure my disbarment will follow right after DA Jim Martin's disbarment. NOT! In fact, if DA Jim gets disbarred over the Labarre case, I'll find a new career! And I'm no friend of Jim. Fact is, there is just no evidence of hanky panky

He, (I suspect you are snarkily him), can still delete his comments. That would be the first smart thing done in six months.

Regarding Mr. O'Hare's 2:33 comment, unless the plaintiff decedent's father (Mr. Villa) was a passenger in the crash vehicle or a patron or employee of the litigated tavern, there would be no reason for the plaintiffs attorneys to call Mr. Villa as a witness. And if the defense attorneys know anything about Mr. Villa's court testimony at sentencing, and how compelling he was, I highly doubt they'll call him as a witness. I've heard from knowledgeable people who were at that sentencing describe Mr. Villa's performance that day as the best lawyering in the courtroom by far, and I believe the resutlts (that is, the sentence handed down) bears this out.

Conversely, I can see why Mr. O'Hare is no longer allowed to practice law. He doesn't appear to know much about it.

Also, in his 2:33 comments, Mr. O'Hare is making an identical sort of "idle threat" that he claims Mr. Villa makes re: threatening litigation.

I hope Villa, who is now shitting his diapers, waits until I'm done copying all of them.

But he has no need to fear me. I'm a nice guy.

Really!

Villa has certainly given me no reason to bear him any animosity.

Without Villa's testiminy, it will be kind of tough for his team to establish loss of future earnings. He's pretty much ruined himself as a witness. If he does take the stand, everyone is screwed. Credibility is always an issue in every case, and Villa will be nailed six ways to Sunday.

But I'm willing to testify as a character witness.

Really!

He nad Mrs. Dottie can just cut a few more CDs. I'm sure they'll sell like hotcakes.

credibility, mental condition and statements of a party are ALWAYS an issue in every civil case.

If there is civil litigation (and you seem to know there is, attorney Najarian, which is curious), you should also know that the "credibility," "mental condition," and "statements" of the plaintiff decedent's father (or other relatives) have no bearing or legal significance whatsoever in a dram shop case.

Mr. O'Hare, Mr. Villa's lost wages or future earnings cannot be recouped in a case such as this, and a determination of Ms. Villa's potential future earnings would not require her father to "take the stand."

Are you and attorney Najarian acting dumb or is this maybe not an act? And Mr. O'Hare I must say that your dumbness appears to be completely genuine.

Don't worry about my question. I'll stop at the LC Civil Division myself on Monday Morning and pick up the docket entries. And what is it that Bill and Mrs. Dottie always say about healthy dissent?

Bill has complained bitterly about the squashing of his healthy dissent, so I think I should do my part and share some of his testimony with the attorneys on both sides of this litigation.

Now Bill, don't you go POOFing anything.

I'm doing my part to help you get the word out. I'm sure your own lawyer will be ecstatic. I hope he's not the same lawyer who represents your ex. If he is, you just created a conflict and one of you will have to get a new lawyer. But that's no biggie. I'm sure your attorney won't mind reducing his fee in half to share with another counsel.

Anon. I'm not gonna take this further, just to say the BV is an actual Plaintiff in his idvidual capacity, at least according to the caption. You're saying he wont be deposed? And no, I part with anyone on any actual intervention. I will not interfere. But thats not the point. I dont know any attorney that would counsel his client to speak/write/post, contact judges, public officials the bar association, whatever, about a pending case. Its just not smart.

Its not curious that I know about his case. Its all very public information and I work in the field. No wild conspiracy there. These are no secrets, especially when BV has threatend repeatedly to sue everyone!

I dont know any attorney that would counsel his client to speak/write/post, contact judges, public officials the bar association, whatever, about a pending case. Its just not smart.

Normally, you'd be right about this. But because you are so wrong in your claim of no "hanky panky" on Jim Martin's part in the 2 cases Mr. Villa has been railing about, Villa's squeaky wheel (more like screaming wheel) strategy was the only reason some measure of justice was served to Robert LaBarre. It's also why, again, contrary to your belief, Jim Martin will get absolutely nailed, and not for the LaBarre case, but for that "September 2007" case nobody (Martin, MC, Bernie O'Hare) wants to talk about. Remember where you heard this first. The reign of Jim Martin will be over soon.

Quite simply, Villa, himself, individually is a party-Plaintiff. Villa must prove his own damages separately from the estate, Its his burden to prove his individual claim. He always is a potential fact witness regarding his daughter. But consider your point, why even risk one's status potential witness. I'll leave it at that. I don't want to debate the facts underlying the case. Thats not for here.

I'm not Jim's friend. His reign will end sometime, But the Lebarre case is no smoking gun. Not in my experience. Time will tell.

My uncle and aunt were both hospitalized and I had to rush to see them. Inexplicably, my uncle's head just fell off. He's pretty old.

Now I'm going to be pretty busy today looking for duct tape for my uncle's head and cutting and pasting all these Villa comments for two different law firms. After I'm done with that, I'll be making a new CD and then I might draw something.

I will be doing exactly what Bill Villa wants - spreading his healthy dissent, very much like fertilizer. I am sure the defense lawyers in his drapshop suit will be ecstatic.

No need to thank me Bill.

Villa claims I've sunk to the bottom. Believe me, I can sink much lower than this.

No need to wait for the weekend to be over Bill. Here's my response to your demand for an apology - I fart on you.

I'm still waiting for the lawsuit you promised after the last time I refused to apologize to you.

I'm not sure if this is Villa or Mrs. Villa, given their propesnity to switch back and forth.

I know it's frustrating when you're wrong and lose argument after argument, but violence is never an answer. It's also an very bad example for you to set for your 7 year old son. Don't you care about that?

Violence is the last refuge of a person deserted by reason. Since you've been irrational for some time, this is no surprise.

But thanks for this additional comment, which I can add to all the others being sent to defense counsel.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm working on an art project for the Chensters next week.

It would be nice if we could all just get along. Seems as if there is a lot of $hit being tossed about. I guess when people pull the turncoat routine, such as Mr. O'MCall, it can be very hurtful.

Seems as if there is a righteous cause in here somewhere, which is being buried in the rubble. It also seems as if the figurehead for said cause is being provoked like a caged snake being prodded by a child with a pointy stick.

Life is unfair and people screw up, pansies and pussies as well as anonymous tough guys and tools. Drop the bull$hit and settle this mess. PLEASE!