We are currently undergoing updates to our site and are working to improve your experience on all devices that you use throughout your day. If you should find a page or a story that is not working correctly, please click here.

Thank you for your patience,

TribLIVE.com Team

This year's crop of Oscar-nominated live-action and animated shorts - five in each category - are a hodgepodge of quality, country of origin and artistic intent. They range from experimental whimsy to brutally realistic Third World drama. Some are original and intriguing, seemingly made by people with a passionate need to express what's on their minds. Others are conservative and dutiful, as if their career-minded creators are hoping to catch studio executives' eyes.

One of the brighter bulbs on the live-action marquee is the eerie, stylish Belgian vignette “Death of a Shadow.” It stars “Rust and Bone” hunk Matthias Schoenaerts as Nathan, a World War I casualty on a one-year reprieve from death. The grim reaper himself admires Nathan's skill as a photographer, employing him to snap amusingly composed silhouette pictures of mortals at the moment of their demise. Mr. Death hangs the prints in a macabre gallery, savoring the images like a connoisseur. When Nathan's term of service is over, he can return to the realm of the living. Unfortunately, he develops tender feelings for one subject, putting his resurrection in jeopardy. The atmosphere is suitably mysterious, the production design darkly luscious, and the plot machinations suspenseful until the fade-out.

The other live-action entries, in decreasing order of interest:

“Buzkashi Boys” is set in war-ravaged Kabul, Afghanistan, where two street kids imagine becoming sports heroes. The athletes they revere play Buzkashi, a bruising horseback game of capture the flag, where the flag is a dead goat. The risk taker of the pair, a confident beggar boy, dares his friend, a blacksmith's son, to break from his family trade and follow his dream. But this is not a land where happy endings come easy. The child actors are engaging and unaffected, and the film feels as authentic as a National Geographic photo essay.

“Asad,” from Somalia, is another story of youths in a violent region, directed with tight efficiency. The title character is a boy from a seaside village whose main occupation has shifted from fishing to armed piracy. An elderly fisherman tells Asad he's destined to land an amazing catch, and when the boy sets out in the old man's dinghy he returns with a most unusual prize. The film affirms the human cost of the region's lawlessness, but leavens it with humor.

“Curfew” gives us a morose New York City hipster who's called to baby-sit for his precocious 9-year-old niece on the worst night of his life. The story is improbable and the relationship he forges with the bossy, insistently cute kid feels forced.

Limping along at the tail of the live action field is “Henry,” a lachrymose French-Canadian tale of an aged concert pianist who is losing the power to distinguish between his present life and memories of better times. Cheap pathos for people who buy their tissues in bulk.

From cartoon land, the best of the bunch is “Paperman,” a black-and-white charmer about a lonely office worker in a mid-century metropolis and his efforts to catch the attention of his dream girl with a squadron of paper airplanes. The Disney Studios entry boasts handsome traditional animation, simple, direct dialogue-free storytelling and admirable comedic-emotional chops.

There's a big-studio polish to the hand-drawn Garden of Eden pooch tale “Adam and Dog,” too: director Minkyu Lee got his start as an animator on Disney's “Winnie-the-Pooh” and “Wreck-It Ralph.” The visually ravishing film explores the links of affection, shame and sympathy that make man, woman and their best friend such a great team.

The Fox entry, “Maggie Simpson in ‘The Longest Daycare,'” is a five-minute gagfest with a so-so hit-to-miss ratio. Dropped off by Marge at the Ayn Rand School for Tots, Maggie tries to rescue a butterfly from the mallet of her malicious nemesis, uni-browed Baby Clarence. The short reflects the long, slow creative decline of the classic TV series. Somebody tell the writing staff that jokes about annoying security screenings are about nine years out of date.

“Head Over Heels,” a claymation story about healing a broken marriage, is nicely produced, shot and edited, but it's overwhelmed by its visual gimmick. After ages of drifting apart, he lives on the floor and she lives on the ceiling. At 10 minutes long, it overstays its welcome by five.

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our
Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent
via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.