At Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:16:23 +0100,
Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 02/06/2014 02:12 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:07:35 +0000,
> > Mark Brown wrote:
> [...]
> >> Hrm, it is but this points out an error in the control helpers which has
> >> been there since forever - they call that parameter max but it's not a
> >> maximum, it's the number of elements in the enumeration. I bet we have
> >> a bunch of other enumerations which miss the last element as a result.
> >
> > Yeah, the argument name is really confusing. I had to double-check
> > the code when I reviewed your patch, too :)
> >
> > Also it'd be better to have a practice to use either ARRAY_SIZE() or a
> > constant there, too.
>> There is also SOC_ENUM_SINGLE_DECL(...) which takes care of the common case
> where you want as many items as your array contains.
Ah, right, that makes life easier.
Takashi