Share this Article

Author:

Tags:

Richard Dawkins is a very atheist man who loves to spread depraved lies about the reality of existence and is probably too scared to debate a savvy creationist, much like our friend Dr. Heinkel, as we’ve seen time and time again.

While atheists will typically try to deny the true nature of Richard Dawkins, a man who only engages in public arguments he thinks he can win and should debate a true creationist so he’ll find God, an odd moment was captured as the laughable ‘astrophysicist’ Neil Degrasse Tyson had a rare lapse of good and questioned Dawkin’s tactic in debate.

Tyson essentially asked Dawkins to stop living a lie and admit that he was on an anti-religious crusade, which necessarily means that he has entered into the realm of public opinion, as no science is certain. Dawkins did not like this very well and in a veiled manner told Tyson, ‘if Christians don’t agree with me or my opinions on science, they can just ‘F* off’.

That’s very rude, cowardly and highly unprofessional. It does give more credence into the true nature of Dawkins and why he refuses to debate. He’ll have to run off screaming ‘lalala’ while yelling obscenities to save face when confronted by the Face of Truth. Pathetic. Let’s look at the video of the child trapped in a man’s body:

About The AuthorPastor Jack "Jbox" Gould is a local best-selling author, motivational speaker and youth pastor extraordinaire at Langley CC, where his stories about the laid back California life and relations to Jack-in-the-Box bobble heads are all the rage. Email Jack a Question

Are you a liar and hoping people won’t watch the video, or did you not watch it yourself? Because not only have you misquoted him, he is actually quoting someone else as an example of rude, counterproductive dialogue. Great job!

I am a Christian, and dear god, look at the ignorance of Paster Gould. Did you even watch the video? Or are you so ready to misconstrue everything so that they agree with your own sympathies? This is just fucking sad.

Wow, this site is my new favorite past time! you talk about Dawkins being on a “anti-religion” crusade, arent you on an “anti-everything that different and we dont agree with” crusade?
I want to be there SSOO bad when you meet god….this is hilarious, I hope it really hands you his blue-prints for life and shows you that HE initiated science so we could BETTER understand the world we live in…..WOW

Did we watch the same video, Pastor? Because what I saw was Dawkins relating a humorous anecdote about another person’s opinions to Tyson, who thoroughly enjoyed the story. Dawkins made it clear that it was the New Scientist Editor’s opinion – he explicitly states the anecdote is “to show that I’m not the worst at this thing.”

How do you get “Dawkins tells Christians to fuck off” from a video of a man talking about someone else’s opinion?

I give this deliberately dishonest and hyperbiased spoof of a web site 2 years if that. Dawkins NEVER told anyone to “F off” he said “IF (and only if)you don’t like it you can F off”. This site is lying.

It’s good to see that Xians are so insecure and cowardly they are going after men with real brains like Dawkins. Shows them what they are really made of.

this Site i have just Recently Discovered. theres been a lot of shit going on for me, mainly stress induced but thats my problem, im not here to tell you that. i just want to thank EVERYONE here for putting things into a perspective. My life isint so bad when i compare it to this site right here. ah The sheer idiocy is enough to make the scummiest man alive feel like a king amongst men.

Thank you all! you truly are the punchline in this joke known as life and religion.

Just because you share your delusion of the Universe’s origin with millions of other deluded whack-jobs, is no excuse for wholly misrepresenting the entire tenor of what was being relayed by Professor Dawkins. I think there are plenty of people, even among the religiously zealous ignorant class (though in ever fewer numbers) who would find at least some aspect of science interesting. That is all Dawkins was saying, “Science is interesting”. Afterall, the truth shall set you free!.

As Winston Churchill said: ‘This is the kind of pedantry up with which I will not put’. The only reason we’re ‘not allowed’ to end a sentence with a preposition is because you can’t do it in Latin, which is what English grammarians decided English grammar should be based on sometimes in the 1700s. No other reason. Go ahead and split your infinitives too! Do some research before you go implying that someone else is stupid.