>Itojun; it seems to me that there's obviously more issues to discuss
>and resolve before we switch to bind9. I would rather that we are
>conservative about this type of upgrade, given the non trivial nature
>of the user visible changes.
understood. but still, is it okay to deploy stuff into
usr.sbin/bind9 and dist/bind9? i don't want to lose this reachover
Makefiles.
(i mean, deploy bind9 code, but don't switch usr.sbin/Makefile
until we get more consensus)
itojun