This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. This question and its answers are frozen and cannot be changed. More info: help center.

closed as off topic by Mark Trapp Jan 26 '12 at 1:24

Questions on Programmers Stack Exchange are expected to relate to software development within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Look at the question rating. It needs to be opened. I have some useful information to add.
–
KolyunyaJul 1 '13 at 13:25

Although it's not exclusive to UML, I use Dia. It has the symbols used in most (if not all) of the UML diagrams, but it also supports flowcharts, network diagrams, and a few other things that I've occasionally used as a software engineer.

I tried most of the aforementioned tools so let me state my opinion on it here:

Dia - an old veteran; builds reliable charts (not just UML) but is rather cumbersome to use (especially if your diagrams get bigger :-( ) almost no restrictions on what to connect to each other, laying out diagrams nicely needs lots of manual adjustment (a serious time killer!), the dialogue boxes are hard to use (e.g. obsolete shortcuts such as alt+O for 'OK' to close it), navigating in a diagram wrecks your nerves with an incomplete endless sheet metaphor (scrollbars only work if one of your objects is out of the viewport; not all the time [like in Inkscape]) etc. etc.;

To sum it up: robust and reliable, but aged (esp. in terms of usability); I used it a lot (and wasted lots of time -rearranging my diagrams).

StarUML and argoUML - just used them shortly as they only support UML 1.x; someone even wrote their thesis (in German) on StarUML's shortcomings!

Visual Paradigm - new, intelligent, but the community edition is very limited: you'll get an ugly watermark if you create more than one diagram type per project; you can, however, easily circumvent this by putting all your diagrams into one and cut it up with graphics app later,
This is my clear recommendation; you just save so much time when creating diagrams compared to Dia!

POPP/POI (Plain Old PowerPoint/Impress) - use your favourite office's graphics app! Dumb to the bones when it comes to what's allowed, but at least the connections flow nicely and aligning objects works like a charm!

Edit: 1/7/2013: The drawing component in Google Docs supports snapping and drawing. Still no "real UML tool", but works good enough and is easily shareable.

Online tools such as gliffy.com - mostly nice, but no good for any serious work ;-)

yEd - I just gave it a short try, but it seems as well suited as Visual Paradigm. Give it a try and see for yourself!

Nota bene: You will find shortcomings (unsupported features, wrong layout etc.) in almost any UML tool you'll use. Thus, IMHO the drawing apps supporting UML shapes or snapping are still the most useful.

I use Umlet. What I like with this software is that it's a drawing tool only. It doesn't force you to create and maintain a model, and it doesn't try to generate/parse code. Unlike a lot of UML tool I tried, I've always been able to draw the diagram I had in mind (the drawing primitives are quite complete, and they are extensible by code).
It works well with my other tools : the text based format is ok for working with my VCS, and the png/svg can be generated using a command line (I use it to automate the build of my doc).

Jude Community is my first choice. Even though they're Astah now, you can still find jude community 5.2 over the web. If you never used I'd give it a try.
PS: I personally didn't like StartUML.

EDIT:

Although they share some very common features and even though Jude is not developed anymore, I prefer Jude mostly because of its usability. I've used Jude some years ago for studying and have to work with starUML + VS UML Tool today (company requirement) so I've been an avid user of both tools. I find Jude way more friendly to use. That's why I said: I personally didn't like StartUML. Features compared I don't know how Jude would go, since we use starUML for documentation purposes only and Jude is discontinued. Regards.

Your post would be more useful if you stated your reasons to prefer Jude over StartUML.
–
VitorFeb 24 '11 at 13:16

@Vitor Granted. Although they share some very common features and even though Jude is not developed anymore, I prefer Jude mostly because of its usability. I've used Jude some years ago for studying and have to work with starUML + VS UML Tool today (company requirement) so I've been an avid user of both tools. I find Jude way more friendly to use. That's why I said: I personally didn't like StartUML. Features compared I don't know how Jude would go, since we use starUML for documentation purposes only and Jude is discontinued. Regards.
–
eesteinFeb 24 '11 at 13:30

StarUML is an open source project to
develop fast, flexible, extensible,
featureful, and freely-available
UML/MDA platform running on Win32
platform. The goal of the StarUML
project is to build a software
modeling tool and also platform that
is a compelling replacement of
commercial UML tools such as Rational
Rose, Together and so on.

I've used many of the really expensive ones and hated them all. I even resorted to using drawing tools in a number of cases, but that was very limiting and leaves you without many of the benefits of having a UML tool to begin with. Anyways, at my latest company they were using one I never tried, Visual Paradigm. I have to say that it is by far the best I've used. It still has its issues but it is about the only one that I actually like to use. Visual Paradigm does pretty much everything the really expensive tools do but at a miniscule fraction of the cost.

They have a free community edition, that I know is available for non-commercial use. I'm not sure if they limited functionality in any other way. If I recall correctly, you can buy a commercial edition for around $100 bucks. So if you need it for commercial purposes and your employer won't spring for that then I'd really be looking for a new job really quickly.

The only thing we haven't looked into yet is multi-developer support, which all the expensive tools are able to do. But from the web-site it seems like they support it.