Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!

If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

I was thinking about this Amd vs Intel thing and have come to the conclusion that The companies are trying to get us to take sides so we will either buy Amd or Intel products more than the other. Nice marketing tatic .:idea: :2cents:

I shall stir the gates of hell once more and stare into the jaws of death and laugh, for I will know fear no more.

Well, all companys ALWAYS try to earn the maximum amount they possibly can, Intel & Amd is no exception.. Think about it, if you owned a company, wouldn't you like to make the biggest possibly money from it..? Well of course..

I went with AMD since they were cheaper, but Intel's price/performance ratio has gotten much better lately and they seem to be the winner.

Personally, I really don't give a rats ass what's under the hood for basic stuff, but I'd rather pay a little more for a P4 or Athlon instead of a C3 or Crusoe or Celeron or Duron and get better performance. On the other hand, I really won't shell out the $$ for a Xeon or SunSPARC box or even the Opterons when they hit.

Hell, I wouldn't care if I ran a Mac. I'm just waiting until the Darwin x86 port gets more refined before I try it.