CLEVELAND, OHIO―Today, Ramón Ortiz filed a lawsuit to enforce a public-records request to the City of Cleveland for records that would reveal whether the police chief or safety director have taken any disciplinary action against officers for the August 16, 2010 attack on Mr. Ortiz's son Juan, and for shouting racial slurs at the Ortiz family. Juan Ortiz suffers from severe Down syndrome, which is visibly evident in his facial features. At the time of the attack, he was under 4'11" tall, weighed approximately 118 pounds, and was 16-years old. His ancestry is Puerto Rican and his complexion is dark.

Sixteen-year-old Juan Ortiz in the hospital after Cleveland police officers slammed him against a hot car and hurt him.

One year ago today, the City agreed to pay a $250,000 settlement stemming from the 2010 incident, but no indication exists that Cleveland has held the officers to account for their actions.

According to the 2011 federal civil-rights complaint the Ortiz family filed, on August 16, 2010, Juan was playing in the yard at his west-side apartment complex listening to his Walkman. There was a robbery reported near the complex, and police were looking for a good-Samaritan white male in his fifties, possibly wearing a red shirt, who had turned in a wallet to the apartment manager. Patrol officer Brian Kazimer shouted at and began chasing Juan.

Startled, Juan ran to his parents on the other side of the parking lot. According to eyewitness testimony, Kazimer wrenched Juan from his mother's arms and slammed him against a parked SUV. Kazimer pinned Juan to the hot car―causing him to sustain burns to his lower abdomen requiring surgery. Kazimer yanked Juan's arms over his head, employing grossly excessive force to restrain a non-resisting suspect who Kazimer admitted had "surrendered" before Kazimer laid a hand on Juan. Kazimer told Juan's parents they were "lucky" he "didn't shoot" Juan.

The attack left Juan suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. The Ortiz family had to relocate out of state due to Juan's visceral and panicked reaction to subsequent sightings of Cleveland police officers and vehicles.

Numerous witnesses testified under penalty of perjury to the bigotry that permeated the violent detention of Juan including vulgar, obscene, and racist language toward Juan and his parents, who originate from the United States territory of Puerto Rico:

But over seven years later, City officials refuse to tell the Ortizes whether it has done anything to hold these officers accountable.

If the City had fired Brian Kazimer and Dan Crisan in 2010 for their racist conduct and excessive force against a defenseless child, the City would have sent the message to its police force that using abusive tactics and excessive force against children would not be tolerated.

Perhaps 12-year-old Tamir Rice would not have been shot dead by Cleveland police four years later in a park just a few miles from where Juan was attacked.

But instead, the City promoted Crisan to sergeant from patrol officer with no apparent consideration of the incident. This seems to have breached ¶ 318(h), at a minimum, of the City's Consent Decree with the U.S. Department of Justice. That paragraph requires that the City take pending discipline into account in the promotions process.

Our office filed Juan's initial federal civil-rights complaint against the officers on July 25, 2011. While the case was pending, the Chandra Law Firm continually followed up with the City about why the officers had not been disciplined. The firm sent letters in January 2013 and January 2014 to then-Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Tim McGinty, then-Chief Assistant City Prosecutor Victor Perez, then-Chief Michael McGrath, and OPS Chairman Thomas Jones requesting criminal prosecution or at least appropriate disciplinary action against these officers.

We received no substantive responses.

Our follow-up efforts included public-records requests to the City, simply trying to find out whether Chief Calvin Williams and Public Safety Director Michael McGrath have done their jobs and disciplined the officers.

We learned in September 2016 that the City had for years withheld public records about pre-disciplinary hearings set for Kazimer and Crisan in August 2011 that the chief held in abeyance pending the litigation's outcome. The City never produced the records about Kazimer and Crisan as part of its response to a federal-court subpoena for such records―even though the records were plainly responsive to the subpoena.

There was and is no written City policy permitting officers to avoid discipline because they were or are being sued for misconduct.

We receive no response to either letter. We forwarded this correspondence to the federal-court- appointed monitor in charge of implementing Cleveland's Consent Decree. Although the monitor acknowledged receipt, we are unaware of any enforcement action that was taken.

Nearly a year later―and over seven years after the attack on Juan and the racist slurs against his family―we have no evidence that these officers have been disciplined―or will ever be disciplined―for what they did.

On September 28, 2017, we sent the City another public-records request for such records.The City did not provide any records or any substantive response to the request.

haven't afforded the Ortiz family the decency and courtesy of communication through their counsel about discipline.

We also asked Cleveland City Council Public Safety Committee Chairman Matt Zone to prod the chief and safety director into action. But no action has occurred.

Subodh Chandra, the Ortiz family's lead counsel, said, "City officials' failure to give closure to this family by communicating that they have disciplined officers who shouted racial slurs at them and brutalized their disabled child is unconscionable, obnoxious, and just plain rude. Does anyone at the City care to do their jobs, hold officers accountable, and be kind to this family and others? Why do officers who shout racist slurs at a family still have badges and guns?"

The case to enforce the recent public-records request was filed in the Ohio Court of Claims, and is case number 5593. Here is the complaint.