Friday, 16 November 2012

What a toxic brew

Wow, what a toxic combination:

A woman. Nay, a brown woman. A brown foreign woman. A brown foreign non-Christian woman. Half a dozen victimhoods rolled into one already. And she has to die because, Ireland being a Catholic country, her viable foetus cannot be aborted. Any one of these factors would be enough to activate the hive of PC fanatics, waiting, delicate nostrils quivering as they scent out any new opportunity for outrage. But all of them rolled into one? No wonder the country's been engulfed in a tsunami of outraged protest ever since the news got out. The Indian Government itself has got into the act, with the Irish Times' correspondent there solemnly informing us that the incident could lead to 'a diplomatic incident' between the two countries.

Wow again.

OK, so what do we actually know about the case? We do know that the unfortunate woman did die under an operation in Galway's University Hospital, and that she was four months pregnant at the time. And what else do we actually know?

Well, surprisingly, that's about it.

So why the mass international outrage? Well, this stems from what her husband claims happened. He claims that his wife wanted an abortion because she felt there was something wrong with the foetus, but was told that this is a Catholic country and it was against the law. Now personally I'd be very surprised if any senior health official said such a thing in today's PC-whipped Ireland. Very surprised indeed. If for no other reason that, while it is a grey area, the law here allows a foetus to be aborted if the life of the mother is at risk. And the whole basis of the husband's case is that her life was in fact at risk. (And by the way if any woman wants an abortion at any time she can hop over the England and get it done.)

So what's going on here? Look, I quite like Indians and we have a lot of them on this blog. But guys, let's just put it this way, you're not exactly Scandinavians when it comes to financial probity. In fact, not to put too fine a point on it, financial shenanigans are your stock in trade. Given all the victimhoods tied up in this, and Ireland's pathological need to be nice to the fuzzy wuzzies, the husband stands to pocket an absolutely enormous financial settlement. If his allegations hold up. To say he has skin in the game would be an understatement. And yes, at this point in time we have only his word for the story that has swept the world.

Now to the Indian Government and their 'outrage' I say FUCK YOU. Irish tourists have died over there as a result of a particularly deplorable scam whereby restaurants poison their tourist customers and then, when the victim feels ill, direct them to private hospitals in on the scam. Who then proceed to shake down the victim for everything he has. Indian Government please note: Numerous people, including some from Ireland, have died from this. And you do bugger all about it. Only a few weeks ago an Irish tourist was found injured somewhere in India. He was left untreated so long (as the hospital checked whether he had insurance cover that they could rip off) that permanent brain damage ensued.

But such incidents are passed over and forgotten about within a day or two. You see the victims are male, they're white and from Christian stock. So actually, they're not victims at all, in fact. You see, there's no such thing as a white male Christian victim.

So my take? We simply do not know what happened in this case other than that a woman died under a procedure at a reputable teaching hospital. An independent investigation has been ordered and I really feel we should wait until this has been completed and the report issued.

Some chance!

No, this opportunity will be milked for everything it's worth between now and then.

I will become really ill if this causes so much "outrage" that Ireland decides to buckle and add abortions to their list of modern conveniences. How about somebody getting "outraged" about babies being dismembered all the time in some sick Satanic sacrifice all over the world - and nobody cares? What with all this outrage - I say Get The Fuck Back To Where You Came From Loretta. Oh and Eimear why don't you go with them? After all the husband torn by grief - can just get a new wife. Or two, or three. Maybe he'll set himself on fire in a reverse sutti-style "protest"? Spare some of your sorrow for your own people who have to walk around all day and wonder if they're in India or Africa or Cambodia. Third World Shitholes are that way because of the people there. And now they're here, and over by you. I just don't understand why some people can't make that connection. I've seen too many abortions and every one of them has made me sick to my stomach despite the excuses given, wah wah. How bout sparing some pity for the torn-to-shreds baby?

Savant, sound man; a bit of sense in this issue is most welcome, whilst the perpetually outraged stampede to judgement. Let there be a competent, well-ordered inquiry, its findings impartially arrived at, (Eimear, do take note.......)is the sine qua non here.

Her husband and her family (my daughter didn't die, she was killed, said her mother) will be fortunate owners of a big, fat compensation check, soon enough. Irish tax payers will pay of course. People are being murdered all over middle-east, there is a genocide of Whites in SA,100.000.000.000 animals are slaughtered each year on this planet, yet Main Sewage Media does not give a fuck (do you Eimear? )A woman died in Galway hospital, and next day it goes global ( evil white Irish Catholics murdered the poor woman). As I wrote in the previous post, this case will open gates, to abortion on demand in Ireland. All yesterday's newspapers had this story on front pages. Holoh$$x survivors are licking their lips, cause fat Nigerian sows and Muslim parasites will not be aborting their children. Irish girls , brought up by Talmud Vision, will. And useful idiots (as comrade Lenin used to call them) will be protesting, not even knowing, what the fuck is going on.

Have to agree with Eimear Savant – what a terrible thing to say although the irony which you weave through the story is brilliant.This poor chap would never be looking for a pay-out!He is simply trying to raise people’s awareness of the ineptitudes of the Irish health system so that it does not happen to anybody else ( from his country ) in the future.Had he known better, as you say, he would have brought his wife here to the UK where we are really good at this sort of thing, and of course we do it for free.Lately however there has been an outcry for more midwives to be trained and recruited because the quality of care is slipping due to the lack of good staff in NHS maternity hospitals. This news is circulated on one day but is never connected or correlated with the other more frightening news.Quarter of Britain's babies are born to foreign mothers

Racism,Feminism and Abortion - Oh my!You're beginning to become a self-flagellating nation that will enrich 100's of lawyers and 1000's of aliens for the tricks that have been done to you.Looks like the juwes are well into their plans to destroy Ireland, have heart opposition to jewish tyranny is growing by the second.

The offshoot of this will be millions of tax payer's money spent of indoctrinating white children to abort their children, and programs to ensure the new comers do not, as you will soon see "that be raycis".

Of course in the previous blog post there was mention of blacks being the main party to abort their kids, that would only be applicable in the fully ghettoised stretches in America.Just take a look across all of Europe and see how the abortion clinics work, non-white organisations abhor the idea.

Trust me when I say, the seed born from this tale about the rights of a non-indigenous resident to abort her child WILL lead to the majority of abortions being conducted on Irish only.

Black and Asian groups will use this as a stick to accuse you of trying to kill them off, you'll spend millions and change laws to prove Ireland is not a racist country, in all the chaos you'll not notice tons of unrelated laws implemented on the back of this to destroy Ireland.

I expect Soros to offer funding for loads of new child ritual murder centres or Abortion Clinics as you'll be programmed to accept them as.

The UK is currently tying itself into knots about white people saying stuff, jailing them, and banning them and generally demonising them. All this 70 years after taking them in, giving them our money and homes (jobs etc) and yet it's still never enough, and ultimately we're still being beating with the "institutionally racist" tag.

If you tolerate this now, then your children will be next...

Meanwhile with the Gaza assault..."Now be a good Goyim and go fight the Arabs for Israel, and no such thoughts about nationalism or freeing yourselves from this tyranny.

When they tried to organise a protest against austerity last week only a handful showed up. But now every town in the country is awash with protesters over this. A girl at work approached me about attending one just now. I sent her the link to this post!

Israel fights for itself. Ireland has long ago lost any capability to do that. Why would Israel want pussies to fight for it? They need real men. The European male is worthless. They cannot defend their own women. Israeli men are real men - they defend their women.

Ivan. Why do you read and post on a WHITE NATIONALIST blog? Why have you taken a white name? Indians are one of our biggest problems in the west. True, negros and muslims are a little worse than you and your kin. That most certsinly not mean you are welcome. I have zero problems with any race, in fact the world would be much less rich without them. I DO have a problem with them the second they step onto white peoples soil with the intention of staying and nesting.

So I'm over my shock that a person who this site is against (with or without savants permission) has been lurcking and posting for a long time

"Ivan" are you demonstrating this hypocrisy by reading and posting here? After all you are living in Ireland aren't you?I would never dream of visiting an Indian nationalists site, I have no interest in Indian nationalism. Hoever, if I was living in India and I intended to stay AND I was aware that Indians didn't want me there then I Would visit an Indian Nationalist site. So you are living in Ireland And you inyend to stay And you are well aware of 80% of peoples feelings about your presence. How can you live with yourself? All I can say is your morals are very different to mine.

This Galway incident is heaven sent for the folk who love nothing better than to undermine society; Ireland will, on foot of this, cave in ignominiously on the matter of legalising abortion, just as it has caved in ignominiously on every issue that has ever come its way. Ireland has all the backbone of a sack of eels.

Savant, how can you say you like them? Meaning Indians. There are 1.5 billion Indians all with different characters. If you are talking about national character, then you must be talking about ineptitude along with absolute dishonesty when their ineptitude is discovered. In my experience (and I have a huge amount with their best and brightest) Indians are very varied(as people generally are). A small few are as bright as Europeans but most are not. Do you mean Ive met a few Indians and I liked them? Try working with them. I have many stories of complete incompetence. I have many stories of cover ups. I also have found a few I like but I wouldn't say they are likeable in general. I have found a few who do a great job and many more who won't or cannot do a passable job. I cannot think of a good national character trait however on an individual level some are nice. Lets remember though. The nice ones (who reside here) are happy to settle in our countries even though they are not welcome. How nice can they actually be?

Reg, I think you're a bit rough on 'Ivan' (strange name for an Indian, I agree) and Indians generally. Of course I don't want to see white lands swamped by anyone but by and large Indians are peacable and hard-working, albeit, as Savant says, a bit dodgy on the ethics front. Do not confuse Indians with Pakistanis, a different kettle of fish entirely.

I used to. My father had Indian friends and colleagues. I had one as a good friend in high school and college. His mom adored me, thought I was a good example. After he moved to NYC and we both had children, we drifted apart.

They are second only to blacks in voting Democrat, even beating out Jews. A surprising number of them identify with blacks. The sub-continent's average IQ is the same as African-Americans'. Either they are mean-reverting or assimilating.

I avoid patronizing their businesses.

Speaking of health benefits, at the US state level, the best single predictor of the autism rate is the product of (% Indians) and (% Finnish ancestry).

I would never dream of visiting an Indian nationalists site, I have no interest in Indian nationalism. Hoever, if I was living in India and I intended to stay AND I was aware that Indians didn't want me there then I Would visit an Indian Nationalist site.

I agree Reg is too rough on Ivan. I also think in general Indians are hard-working and peaceful. They are nothing like the African American which has to be the lowest creature on the planet. What you are all saying about how abortion is used to kill off Whites is true. Blacks and Mexicans get too much welfare for each one they have to do it. I don't like that the lady died, but her death shouldn't be why abortion is pushed through in Ireland.

quite right. My first thought was that the "thing" that was "wrong" with the unborn baby was that it was a girl. Girls are selectively aborted in India all the time. I'm too lazy to link right now but if anyone googles it, you'll come up with plenty of stories and stats about sex-selective abortion in India, etc.

Like someone on here already said: they always abort girls. This is crazy and BETTER NOT be the catalyst for abortion in Ireland. Truly - if we see this is will be one serious confirmation of the world turned upside down (like we need confirmation anyway LOL). The stupid bitches agitating for abortion are morons. I don't like to say it being a woman, but most women don't really have a clue and that's why the world IS going to shit. Because of single mothers and the dunces they raise while the man pays child support and seethes from a distance - unable to offer discipline or advice as he will be punished by law for some charge of "paternalism" (naahh, really?) These motherfuckers could USE a little. I swear I will go postal one of these days.

Good question. I know 3 Irish dentists who are barely scraping a living since the govt too away free dental care. Foreign practitioners aren't making their lives any easier. And remember we have no obligation whatsoever to allow her to practice here.

Saw this go by in my newsfeed, and was sure Friend Savant would have something interesting to say about it. I was not disappointed. But do try to see things from the Indians' point of view. No woman in India goes without first-rate obstetrical care, and no Indian hospital ever experiences a screw-up, so surely their perplexity and outrage at this poor medical outcome is understandable.

Hey Eimear? Sorry, but if the two-faced Third World resenters and their white castrati enablers hadn't spent the last forty years turning every vibrant's misfortune into a huge screeching Hate Whitey Fest and Shakedown Jamboree (with the predictable show trial and ritual humiliation of white men no doubt in the offing), my first reaction to the woman's death would indeed have been one of simple human empathy and compassion. But they have yet again seen fit to turn such an incident into yet another attack on a leeched-upon European people and a European culture, and I'm already fed up to the back teeth and beyond. Callous is all I've got left, babe.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if it all ends with a demand from the Indian government that Ireland take in a few more tens of thousands or so of their nationals, and Ireland acquiescing.

@Reg. Yes, it's a bit of a generalisation all right for 1.4 billion people. But generally I've found Indians to be hard-working and seldom caused trouble. Apart from a proclivity for shady dealings. I've found them to be reasonably efficient work-wise but don't seem to have the confidence to take on whites or Arabs when they're employed by them.

In 1992 in the X case the raped girl understood she was to have a Caesrean Section and never threatened suicide when she was sen by a psychologist and not pyschiatrist as reported by our concerned with accuracy media but the needs of the liberals overrided hers and so off she went and the mental health of the potential mother was taken into account and now after the tragedy with the demi-nigger the liberals are out on the streets protesting for what they sincerely believe in.

Fuck off Reg, I don't live in Ireland. My comment was on the hypocrisy of the Indian government and nothing else. Neither do I give a damn about so-called nationalists, apparently white in your case who can't think straight.

So now; a woman dies of, it seems, septicaemia (blood poisoning) whilst four months pregnant. Whether or not removal of the foetus would have averted this I cannot say. Since this tragedy occurred in one of the best maternity hospitals in a country which ranks among the top safest handful of places worldwide for women and their unborn children, it looks at this point to have been very much an aberration. Now, take a single edition of one (admittedly very lowgrade)newspaper, the Evening Herald of Friday 16th November. Two pages devoted to the womans parents, at least one of whom has accused this country of murder; a whole page from some heifer called Colette Fitzpatrick asking "how much longer must women wait to be protected by the State?" (this being the gender which has absolutely everything all its own way). Another whole page is handed to a second liar, one Kirsty Blake-Knox, to declaim "this is no country for young women"----------the tendentious lies pile up like a logjam, and noone questions any of it.

What ARE bloody Indians doing in Ireland???As I said earlier,surely Ireland can produce their own dentists?There is something fishy about this entire story.A course of IV antibiotics would surely have mitigated the septicemia.Why do these third worlders insist upon coming to a country that is not in line with their beliefs or culture?

The enemy psychological warfare unit known as the Daily Mail simultaneously "reports" that, ‘Savita was more Irish than many locals’ and asks, 'Might Savita still be alive today if she and Praveen had decided to settle somewhere else — almost anywhere but Ireland?'

Let me translate from NewSpeak:

Savita was more Irish than Irish people, but Ireland was too Irish for Savita, which was the cause of her murder, I mean death. Therefore Ireland will have to become more Irish, like Savita, by becoming less Irish. Confused? You will be, after this weeks episode of Soap!

She chose to live in Ireland, a choice that was not given to Irish people, who cannot just go and live in India, and who do not want Ireland becoming India.

Ho hum. Savita died as a result of the abortion she was given at the hospital. Apparently the child had already died in the womb for which reason she was taken to hospital.

If she didn't want a girl she would have taken the 30 minute flight to England and paid for a termination. But most likely the sex of the child was never disclosed.

She died from post operative complications involving septicaemia and an e-coli infection. This is most likely as a result of the surgery itself and possible non-sterile equipment or conditions.*

Did they puncture her womb during the surgery? If so, does that mean there will be international protests to end free healthcare in Ireland? Or are the Talmud-Vision cultists only serious when it comes to killing infants?

Now, a friend of mine had his legs amputated recently. He was 66 years old and was viciously attacked by foreigners in Bradford. He had to undergo several surgeries as his vital organs failed. But he unfortunately contracted an mrsa infection whilst in the hospital and had his legs removed from the knees.

Where the protests about mass immigration? None. Nada. Why? Because women's "rights" to murder viable children in the West is one aspect of the Marxist/Jewish Frankfurt school's project to destroy Western civilisation aka the white race. Whereas mass immigration also serves that end, hence no protests ove immigration for Keith.

And just to shake things up a bit, lets look at the actual abortion laws:

The grounds, thus, for conducting an abortion are:

1. A pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner,- (a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twelve weeks if such medical practitioner is Of opinion, formed in good faith, that,-(i) the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or mental health ; or(ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicappedHowever, when the pregnancy exceeds 12 weeks but is below 20 weeks, the consultation of two registered medical practitioners is required.

2. A pregnancy occurring as a result of rape

3. Failure of contraceptive device used by a couple.

* Dare I suggest that using 3rd worlders to clean hospitals might not be the best idea in the world? And, oh, please please tell me the surgeon was an enricher!

PS - For those of you who got this far. Those laws above are, you guessed it, the Indian MTP Act abortion laws. Hehe.

The control freaks want us to believe that this 1/16 of mitochondrial DNA from the Levant will cause you to want to make adverts about white women and black men, make films about evil white men and perform some magic which results in lots of Muslims getting on planes to come to white non-Muslim countries.

There are some fruits about.

I was reading another blog yesterday in which apparently, Francois Hollande is a Jew, and the evidence for this is a photo which shows Hollande walking along with two Jews.

One of the gifts of living in a multi-cultural dystopian jewish nightmare is I've got to know all kinds of people from all kinds of walks.Most of the alien cultures to the West have all sorts of incompatible customs, Indians have a penalty for unmet dowry promises, usually involves setting fire to the wife when her family could not may payment of the promised bribe, etc.

In India the customary method to employ when inducing a miscarriage and aborting the fetus is to consume large quantities of Saffron.

I wonder if any tests are going to be made on her.

Whatever happens you won't have to look to far to spot the juden capitalising on the fallout of this story to further their ends and to ultimately damage Ireland's.

Never really thought about it until nastiest hasbarat said this "apparently, Francois Hollande is a Jew"

We all knew that Sarkosy was a rat-faced anti-human, and recently their chutzpah has made them feel comfortable in showing their faces in public office across the Occident as if the world adores them, when really it's the controlled media pretending juwes are human.Most of the West's leaders have jewish traits and DNA(Both Cameron and Miliband)

Anyway back to Hollande, aside from being spiritually a jew, and serving the juwes, while looking like a jew he is also claimed to ethnically be a jew.

Ultimately if a Goyim serves the juwes ends, he is no more than a juden.

I'd be keen to see more evidence, as it stands I'm confident he serves jewry, as to him being a fully fledged anti-Christ advocate, time will tell.

Screw-ups with fatal results happen regularly in the Health Service, and are probably inevitable, given that doctors are only human. The real scandal is that Indians and other non-Whites are having babies here - that's something that could be prevented. Walk into any maternity ward and you'll see we're outsourcing our breeding to the Third World.

India for the Indians!Africa for the Africans!White countries for everyone!

One MSM site in the US describes her as an "Irish woman".

In order to solve a "race problem" White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with hundreds of millions of 3rd worlders. The "race problem" will be "solved" by forced integration and "assimilation", a.k.a. intermarriage, with all those 3rd worlders.

A great story about India. About 10 years after independence they decided to have a national survey to see if the people thought things were better before or after independence. They refused to publish the results when it emerged that almost 80% of the peasants in the heartland never even knew that independence had been achieved.

You live in a european country. Otherwise explain why you are interedted in white peoples business? I bet you live in the England. That's even worse cause the poor English cannot even walk outside their house without seeing one of you people.

Speak for yourself dickhead. I am not interested in common cause with you, neither am I interested in linking up with non whites. Are you so tetarded that you reject one brown person to accept another. Do you even understand what nationalism is?

I have experience of both. Neither should have ever been allowed nest in a white country. We get rid of them all or none. I just cannot grasp the idea that one is better than the other. Their actions while living in our countries are incidental. It doesn't matter if one rapes our kids and the others don't. All need to removed.

"Never really thought about it until nastiest hasbarat said this "apparently, Francois Hollande is a Jew"

We all knew that Sarkosy was a rat-faced anti-human, and recently their chutzpah has made them feel comfortable in showing their faces in public office across the Occident as if the world adores them, when really it's the controlled media pretending juwes are human. Most of the West's leaders have jewish traits and DNA(Both Cameron and Miliband)

Anyway back to Hollande, aside from being spiritually a jew, and serving the juwes, while looking like a jew he is also claimed to ethnically be a jew.

Ultimately if a Goyim serves the juwes ends, he is no more than a juden.

I'd be keen to see more evidence, as it stands I'm confident he serves jewry, as to him being a fully fledged anti-Christ advocate, time will tell.

My take is that you could perhaps rather mischievously 'play ball' yet further cement a pro Irish stance.Seeing as one of the arguments laid out was the woman was neither Catholic or Irish, then make abortion in Ireland legal only for those not entirely of Irish blood, include a caveat that allows for abortion for mixed race also including rape victims, which more often than not will go hand in hand.

The pro baby killers like the juwes and wogs can freely murder their own, yet reinforcing and perhaps opening an interesting can of worms over the nationalism issue.Win-Win!

However Alan Shatter types have far more sway in these matters than a goy like me, and his only interest will be dead goyim babies rather than his own Satanic tribe's.

There was a candle lit vigil in Dublin this evening.Those in attendance seemed to be mostly Trinity collage liberal types.They always remind me of Mrs Jellby from Dickens Bleak house.Like her,these telescopic philanthropists dont give a fuck about their own.D'ont remember there being a vigil for Nicola Furlong.

Indeed.And judging by the language on this blog(my own included),why would anyone put a couple of *'s in the word "asshole?"

Perhaps another contribution from Chicago?.

Although that anon capitalized the "F",his grasp of punctuation,in even such a short post,betrays his origins as being on the shores of Lake Eerie.(Or whichever the fuck of the Great Lakes it is:I'm not too sure.And I don't care.)

Irish women street protesters eh. God keep me from them.Glad I wasn't out today,seeing em on the news this evening was bad enough. None of those bulldykes will utter a whisper about what's going on in Rochdale and the danger of it spreading all over these islands because the kind of men doing it are above all white women on the white feminist protected group list. You put white women in charge and this is what you get. Shatz must lovem.

Reg what makes you think I want to make common cause with idiots like you? Google blogs are accessible from anywhere in the world and the hosting servers could be in Uzbekistan or Hindustan for all you know. Think about it: some Indian coders are even now running the scripts and maintaining the databases that keeps Google functioning. That should be enough to give you the creeps eh?

Ivan, don't mind Reg - he's being very rude and unpleasant. Most Irish people think well of Indians. However it is a fact that we're being over-run by non-Europeans with their own very disctinctive cultures and that makes many of us quite angry.

Here's a good one for you and your readers Savant. Chief Rabbi of Britain on the Gaza situation. Thing is, he thinks he's off air before being helpfully reminded by the BBC's enablers. A short clip but very telling, especially considering he had just delivered the 'Thought for the Day.'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8mdCWNY-g8&feature=player_embedded

By the way those Indians have very short memories. Rememeber the Air India disaster and all the kindness we showed them then?

The antiJew disease really does cause people to go insane. Most Jews would be more than happy to have strict immigration controls, but they will never throw in with people so unhinged they could not get accepted in the Nazi party. For example re 00:43 the chief Rabbi was asked that question, without being told he was on the air! The BBC has had to apologize - but here the BBC are enablers? They were his enemy and it was A typical left wing media sleaze trick - odd since according to all the crazies here, the Jews control the media.

Anon 1.25. I'm a bit confused as well about how what the Rabbi said was so awful. He thought about the question and said Iran might be involved. Thinking he was off the air meant he assumed the response would not get braodcast, so what was his point in making it if his intention was to propagandize?

Almost certainly stirred up by the shatter types , why? because they want it legalised so they can kill more white babies of course, it all fits in with their plans to replace the sleeping irish, you best wake up quick because they really are going to town on Ireland.

Excuse me? Translation- Dismiss Reg, he's a fool and doesnt understand like I do. Who's being rude? You or me?So you think we can replace all non whites in our countries with indians and things will be great? Or did you bother to think through what you posted?Did you also consider the types of indians we come in contact with? We meet their best educated. When they nest you can be sure over the generations they'll revert to mean. Go to any indian slum and tell me they are wonderful.

Over the years I have found it impossible to come up with reasons to be proud of Ireland in any substantial number. One of the very few (our WW2 neutrality, flawed as it was, being one instance)was the knowledge that Ireland was one of the safest places in the world for a woman and her child, born or unborn.A woman dies in a Galway hospital of, I believe, blood poisoning. She was four months pregnant at the time.There appears to be a relatively tenuous connection between these two things. What do we get? International outrage, no less!We are to have an "international expert"(sic) come visit, to pronounce upon the matter; a flunkey from the Indian government demands that our laws be rewritten; we are to have a tidal wave of advocacy from the media, which takes its entire ideology by the way from a foreign trade union,that our laws be "brought into line"; mass protests featuring an overwhelming preponderance of the "nurturing and caring" gender are seen demanding that a regime wherein unborn children are to be slaughtered en masse as a matter of convenience----do we stand firm for our enlightened stance just for once, or do we as so often elsewhere cave in ignominiously on this issue too? We shall see.

What post were you reading cause I never ever said I want to make common cause with you or any asian.You were vert quick to tell me you are not in Ireland. Funny how you didn't say ypu are not in England. Keep in mind that you are a foot soldier in the attempted conquest of a white country by colonisiation. If you weren't before, you are now. Trying to conqur a people is not free. The English haven't done anything yet because they are being oppressed by their evil rulling clas. When that powder keg blows you will meet the opposition foot soldier. You wont last long. You probably think this will never happen. I think differently.BTW indians in google work there, they own nothing. They are cheap labour, nothing more. If any of this cheap labour starts to develop an agenda of their own they will be sacked, maybe even prosucted.

Heraclitus, thank you I am quite aware of that. I came here knowing that the savant would have a good take on the incident. Apparently the bereaved husband is going back to Ireland to fight for something he calls "women's rights". I'm guessing that he does not understand the irony in someone from India and in particular his state (Karnataka) talking about women's rights. This is a country where there are fathers who hang themselves when are not able to come up with dowry for their daughters. Where they are laws in the statute books that specifically target so-called dowry deaths wherein the daughter-in-law is burned or hanged for not turning up with a motorcycle or cash when she steps into her in laws home. A country where to get good or even adequate treatment in some hospitals the use of a "brown envelope" to encourage the doctors is mandatory. The list is endless, but what strikes me about this case is the underlying hatred of Catholicism which is endemic in his state. See http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctliveblog/archives/2012/10/india-government-seizes-catholic-leper-ministry-land.html Like I said no one does hypocrisy better than Indians.

@Ivan. A very fair and perceptive comment. I think Reg should acknowledge that your take on this incident is very fair-minded and I for one welcome you on this blog. Fair-minded and insightful input should be welcome on any forum, in my view.

Trayvon comes from a country where daughters are not that welcome so it is strange to see all these concerned wimenz demanding that Caryn be allowed to get rid of daughters until she obtains a Barakkk Hussein.

Jesus H. He has friggin well explained why indians should be kept out of all oir countries. Are you willfully ignoring the obvious in your excitement at welcoming an alien into our world. Tell me? Whats the difference between you and one of those quislings that throw out the red carpet to Nigerian asylam seekers?I'm starting to think I'm the person in the wrong place. After I'm gone you can oooze over Ivan the indian's culture, his lovely brown skin and the unique enrichment he and his fellow country people bring to the philistine English.

'Ivan, don't mind Reg - he's being very rude and unpleasant. Most Irish people think well of Indians. However it is a fact that we're being over-run by non-Europeans with their own very disctinctive cultures and that makes many of us quite angry.'

Well said Heraclitus! For me the commenters on this blog is split right down the middle. One half (or less, unfortunately) is legitimately outraged by what is happening to our homelands, but they have retained sense and fairminded-ness and are not bigots or ignorant delinquents. The other half are legitimately outraged, do not understand it why it is happening, look for reasons and pin the blame on an easy target. IT then all makes sense to them and they have a real enemy to fight, rather than a faceless nothingness. They lose sight of reality (if they had it in the first place.)

Whilst feeling sorry for the latter, because it is complicated, I so wish for the former to win out and sense to prevail but it looks unlikely. I wish that Savant could somehow issue some QC here. Or simply for someone to set up a new blog, but Savant is so damn good he'd be hard to replace.

To quote the good Aryan Luke Skywalker '"Fear is the path to the dark side.."

The English affected Indian culture, some for good, some for bad. The indans are affecting English culture, some for good, some for bad. They certainly should not be allowed to become such a large part of English society numerically but they are there, the English started it a long time ago. What date did the English first invade India? They made tons of Dosh which funded the industrial revolution. Get over it.

More importantly, The Irish need to cop the hell on and learn to protect what is good about our culture. Who can help them do this? I don't know. Good, hard hitting blogs is a good place to start. Ones full of angry, verbally aggressive men endlessly blurting weird, convoluted, sometimes entirely non sensical theories isn't.

onthefence. Yes, it's true that Briatin invaded and colonised the world over. Personally I believe we, for a multitude of reasons, greatly improved those lands. But either way it's quite ridiculous to claim that because Britain invaded some place centuries ago that people from that country have some entitlement to invade England. Just think through the implications and I'm sure you'll agree.

Isn't it amazing that on short notice you can have big protests for the rights of a deminigger to abort her fetus because it is the wrong sex arranged at short notice wityhout much being known about the situation but nobody takes to the streets against austerity?

Perhaps we should inform concerned journalists that austerity means no cultural choice for the darkskinned?

Isn't it amazing that on short notice you can have big protests for the rights of a deminigger to abort her fetus because it is the wrong sex arranged at short notice wityhout much being known about the situation but nobody takes to the streets against austerity?

Actually anon an awful lot of people are asking the same question. Problem is, they're not coming up with the right answer.

concerntrollonthefence: The English affected Indian culture, some for good, some for bad. The indans are affecting English culture, some for good, some for bad. They certainly should not be allowed to become such a large part of English society numerically but they are there, the English started it a long time ago. What date did the English first invade India? They made tons of Dosh which funded the industrial revolution. Get over it.

Oh christ, not this bullshit again. Get over what? What does that even mean?

So Indians "should certainly not be allowed to become such a large part of English society". But "the English started it". So how do we manage this little tit-for-tat exercise that you seem to think is some sort of moral imperative? (It isn't. By whose law do the English now have to bend over and surrender a chunk of their territory and culture to the peoples they once ruled? Because they were winners once in the endless human history of invasion and conquest, so now they have to "voluntarily" lose so everyone's equal? Are you preaching this egalitarian, redistributive, "I'm so sorry that I won that round" philosophy to the non-white invaders and conquerors of the earth?)

But let's pretend your fellator's morality isn't the nonsense that it is. Do we measure out the effects, good and bad, that the English had on India, and how many colonizers still squat on Indian land, and then declare, "OK, Indians, you can send this many over here, and have this much good, and this much bad, cultural effect on us? We'll bend over and let you have at. Fair is fair."

There may be some level of English DNA now floating around India, but in case you haven't noticed, the English left, lock, stock, and barrel. So how does your precious little moral calculus handle this? Do the subcon colonizers have to clear out of Britannia 300 years from now? Got a contract that binds their descendents to this in your retribution files? Do the naughty naughty but now suitably chastened English get their land and culture back, now that everything's even-stephen?

In the meantime, Indians (and Pakistanis, and Nigerians, and etc., etc., etc.) still have a homeland, while an Englishman is now a foreigner in his own country.

There is no karmic force of nature out there that just up and dumped huge gobs of subcons on the British Isles, like a hurricane that is beyond human control. Not one national of a former colony could have set foot on British soil but for the deliberate policy preferences of a governing class motivated by varying degrees of corruption, malignant ideology, and garden-variety incompetence and irresponsibility. Abetted by malignant resenters, er, deep-thinking moral philosophers like yourself.

Hector G, thank you.The savant puts up witty posts which is the main reason why I read them. If Reg etc want to make a snide contribution, say on the order of the comments at Guido Fawkes, I suggest they up their game instead of repeated brainfarts that we've read thousands of times. The reason I posted here was the dripping sanctimony and unfairness of the coverage.

Anonymous victimologist: Back on topic, the Indians and Irish have a long history together.

Why yes, they do. A long proud history! The British imperial machine was lousy with Irishmen, and they were right there alongside those English bastards kicking the wogs around.

Well, everyone should learn what the British did to our Irish people. That Queen Victoria purposely kept food from our people and that the 'potato famine' was a deliberate act to kill off our people.

Yes, Queen Victoria deliberately tried to engineer the genocide of the Irish, just like some white guys deliberately engineered the AIDS virus to genocide all the blacks.

You know, there's enough evidence in the undisputed historical record to demonstrate that human beings are callous rapacious unjust shits to one another, including the English to the Irish. So what's the need for the hysterical victimology fabrications? Listening to the caterwauling in the "most oppressed people ever" competition, you'd think being disastrous historical losers was a thing of pride, right up there with producing a Newton or an industrial revolution or a Chartres cathedral. (And it's not as if the Irish weren't slave-nabbing shits to the English when they had the opportunity in earlier epochs.)

You can also read how our people were slaves and suffered worse than negroids.

"Our people" and everybody else's people, too. I'd like to be able to point to a record of achievement among my ancestors that consisted of something more impressive than "top scores in getting enslaved and ass-kicked by better-organized and more technologically advanced people!"

But hey, you're really sticking it to Queen Victoria by uniting with your brown brothers in anti-English solidarity and...handing your country and culture over to them after finally having tossed out the English bastards. That'll show the old bitch!

Rohan Swee - spot on. I too am fed up with MOPE (most oppressed people ever). For hundreds of years the Irish were just another component of the British and we were every bit as good and bad as they were. We used the British as an excuse to explain away our own failings and we began to achieve things only when we sloughed off these sentiments.

anonymous victimologist: Rowhan Swee, 02:28 shove it where the sun doesn't shine. Your people are murderers of the Irish.

Are you referring to fratricidal violence among the Irish (source of all my sword-side genes)? Or perhaps White Cargo covers some homicidal expeditions of Bretons into Eire? Thank you for the recommendation. I look forward to filling in my deplorably spotty grasp of Irish history.

Now girls, I'm all for open debate (as Nastiest Uncle will testify) but I really don't like to see inter-White arguments and abuse breaking out. I'm not blocking the comments but I'd like to see them stopped. As the other commentator up there said, this is playing into our real enemies' hands.

When he was Home Secretary, David Blunkett discovered how disastrous the benefit of the doubt could be. Had Alistair McAlpine been Home Secretary at the time, what would he have done?

Ian Huntley…why was his past erased?

What follows is a disturbing tale of how ignoring circumstancial evidence and doubtful acquittal may have led to the deaths of two little girls, Holly Marie Wells and Jessica Aimee Chapman. They were murdered in the village of Soham, Cambridgeshire on 4 August 2002. The girls passed the home of local school caretaker Ian Kevin Huntley, who called them into his house and then murdered them. In December 2003 he was convicted of two counts of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, with the High Court later setting a minimum term of 40 years.

After Huntley was convicted, it was revealed that he had been investigated in the past for sexual offences, but had still been allowed to work at Soham School – as none of these investigations had resulted in a conviction.

This much many British citizens already know. But what most of them will not know is how potentially fuzzy and misleading the phrase ‘had still been allowed to’ actually is. And to learn more about this, we have to go back to a past involving Huntley…..and a local Labour Party bigwig on Humberside.

Read on and be amazed at the saga of a former social worker and Labour Councillor on Humberside called Colin Inglis.

'Oh christ, not this bullshit again. Get over what? What does that even mean?'

It means that if one nation becomes so involved in the affairs of another, if it invades, provides a new governing elite, if it trades with , teaches, enlightens, abuses, makes profits off... and loses it, Then when it engages in real fratricidal world wars and uses Indian subjects as soldiers, and when it sacrifices so many of it's own that it needs to import people to do the work of those sacrificed, then you can expect an amount of cultural, economic and demographic exchange to take place.

I don't like it either. I have no problem with numbers that can be absorbed and assimilated. I'm angry that that is not the case and that a whole industry has been created to replace our people by another. But to say there should be no demographic transaction whatsoever is ridiculous, pointless and boring.

I have no problem with Britain or it's empire. It did good, it did bad, so what? it just 'was" and it 'was' because of the steel, determination and discipline of a culture long gone. I'm saddened by what has happened England since the war, and I know it faces all of us unless there is a sea change in peoples attitudes.

The only victimhood I suffer is having to suffer extremist eejits on all sides, feminists, communists, national socialists, zionists et al. You're boring, the whole bleeding lot of you.

Please allow me to try to clarify, as I don't understand what you're referring to. Perhaps the Armorican bastards? That was a joking reference to my Breton ancestors. I apologize for my lack of clarity and failed wit. Let me rephrase that response: I am not English.

I left out having to suffer 'liberals'! How could I forget them? The daft, do-gooding, brain fried twats.

Give me a good, hard working, rational, open-minded family man, moderate in habits (but not too moderate), who by instinct is against mass immigration, by instinct is suspicious of our elites but essentially believes in authority and self discipline, yields to God, but doesn't fawn over the church. That's the kind any nationalist movement needs.

onthefence: It means that if one nation becomes so involved in the affairs of another, if it invades, provides a new governing elite, if it trades with , teaches, enlightens, abuses, makes profits off... and loses it, Then when it engages in real fratricidal world wars and uses Indian subjects as soldiers, and when it sacrifices so many of it's own that it needs to import people to do the work of those sacrificed, then you can expect an amount of cultural, economic and demographic exchange to take place.

otf, if it doesn't interfere too much with your preferred state of Olympian ennui, may I suggest that if it annoys you to be taken for a concern troll, that you make some effort to differentiate your views, and style of presentation, from the propagandists for mass immigration and population replacement? Because every one of your bullet points is a long-standing polemical favorite of the very people who man that "whole industry [that] has been created to replace our people by another", which you claim to so deplore. ("We must have mass immigration...because we had an empire! Because we had (have) a labor shortage!...because, because, because, and not a single "because" really backed up by any law of nature or history.)

You come across as a concern troll, because you do not strike me as stupid, and no intelligent person arguing with respect and good faith goes into a discussion with the assumption that his interlocuters are such peculiar creatures that they deny the most obvious feature of history, viz., that there is always some level of "cultural, economic and demographic exchange" taking place between peoples who have anything to do with one another. You are boring yourself with your own straw men. People reasonably assume you are after something else, because it would otherwise be very puzzling why anybody, who wasn't simply dull, wouldso belabor so trivial a point.

Savant, once again on the subject of the fly in your ointment (this blog). I've taken a long time to get to this point, but I'm convinced his intentions are not friendly. He is indeed a troll. He's here to destroy your work.

From the beginning, his tactics have been pure Alinsky. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon... Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Consider, he came here out of nowhere, identified one of the most popular and prolific posters, and appropriated and perverted his name. His attempts at ridicule consist of the kind of puerile potty humour that the rest of us outgrew by the age of eleven. He's not very good at it; as Uncle Nasty points out, they're not really all that smart. All in all, he's just an irritant. I'm all in favour of free expression of divergent opinions, but he's not debating in good faith.

I didn't vote on the relevant thread, but is it too late to register my vote now? Swat this pest.

There isn’t any evidence that an incorrect decision was made. The prognosis for septicemia isn’t good, especially combined with other infections, so it’s just a wide assumption at this point that the failure to allow the patient to self-diagnose her treatment is what killed her.

UN< w/r/t the paedophile murders, there's no doubt whatever that a major high-powered ring existed. There are far too many coincidences to be explained by chance. Same in Belgium. The main investigator was thrown off the case. Even after a near insurrection TPTB didn't back down and those who fired him are still in power.

@Analogman. Accepting what you say is correct, what 'harm' is he doing? Anyone who doesn't want to read him doesn't have to. And if he's that unconvincing then is he not shooting himself if the foot?

I accept that there is a risk as someone astutely pointed out above 'Jews join organisations they don't like'. But I have a visceral dislike of closing down or banning contra opinion. My belief is that if you cannot prevail against falsehood then there's something wrong with your (our) argument.

The harm is not in his opinions. I don't read them anyway; not because I disagree with them, but because he goes out of his way to express them as obnoxiously as possible. You may have noticed that, after you posted that thread asking whether he should be banned, he behaved himself for a day or two.

He is not arguing to convince. He is simply poisoning the discourse in order to destroy your blog.

You have a quality set of commenters here. It was they, as much as your own writing, that attracted me to this blog. The wide range of knowledge, literacy and civility made the comment threads a pleasure to read. More recent newcomers might have a different experience.

>SAVANT said...20 November 2012 17:11@Analogman. Accepting what you say is correct, what 'harm' is he doing?

As Analogman indicates, he's polluting the discussion with trollish comments. This causes the discussion to degrade into a lot of flying insults as it races to the bottom.

He's also causing me to sometimes not to bother.

> Anyone who doesn't want to read him doesn't have to.

Just like the 'No Dogs' signs you see at parks and beaches, most people don't want to navigate through turds at every turn.Sure, we can turn a blind eye, but Whites have been doing that for a long time now. When will we stop tolerating being 'shat' upon?

> And if he's that unconvincing then is he not shooting himself if the foot?

He's unconvincing to those who know that he's a troll. To new comers (his target) he somewhat plausible.

>I accept that there is a risk as someone astutely pointed out above 'Jews join organisations they don't like'.

>But I have a visceral dislike of closing down or banning contra opinion.

I understand and agree in principle with your sentiment, but we are at war. If you were the minister of 'information' during a war would you have a visceral dislike to banning enemy propaganda? I don't think so.What we need is genuine debate in good faith, not shit-stirring.

>My belief is that if you cannot prevail against falsehood then there's something wrong with your (our) argument.

Prevailing against endless enemy falsehoods takes time and energy away from the fight. As above, this is not some academic exercise, this is a war for White survival. Quite a few normal rules do not apply.

Blood your hand by first culling some of the more obvious trollish comments. It gets easier after the first time.

The IRA, Dan, is (was) one of the most capable paramilitary entities ever, one from whom, among many others, the Haganah and the Irgun had much to learn; they are the military wing of the most inept and vacuous political movement anywhere in Ireland.

Interesting that a lot of the twats on those marches were RTEheads who tweeted they were going and asking for support. One producer even called some politician (Ronan Mullen?) a fn something and that excused yet if it were done to Saint David Norris of the Perversion it would be an absolute scandal.

RTE one rule for them and their kind and another for everyone else.

They cannot be let away We caught Sean Gallagher out. It was a fake tweet which means thta any old idiot could set up a false account and they would use it because they do not understand the new media.