The Mazda3 i Grand Touring car is, for people who like to drive, more fun than many of the top sports cars

IN TWO WEEKS, if all goes according to plan, I will drive the McLaren P1 at Dunsfold. That is the rubbish test track you see on "Top Gear." And some sun-kissed day soon, I'll mambo with the LaFerrari hypercar on a sublime corso in Italia. Va bene.

But a car like the Mazda3 i Grand Touring (as tested, $24,635) is, for people who like to drive, pound-for-pound, minute-by-minute, more fun than either of those ladies, stumbling around in their high horsepower stilettos. Outside of a race track, the McLaren and Ferrari—actually, most exotic hypercars—are slapstick figures: nearly impossible to get out of second gear without drawing the attention of the local constabulary; requiring secure parking for even a trip to the market; and mobbed by car-loving mouth-breathers most of the time. A dirigible would be more convenient.

The Mazda3 Grand Touring i is an affordable, desirable, entertaining family compact that's more fun on the open road than the McLaren P1 or a Ferrari hypercar. Dan Neil has his review on the News Hub. Photo: Mazda.

Photos: Mazda3 i 5-Door Grand Touring

Click to view interactive. Dan Neil/The Wall Street Journal

Mazda
's
freshly redesigned five-door hatch drives like it was on cartoon animation, just happy to be on its wheels and eager to heat up the tailpipe. It isn't fast, particularly, and it doesn't have unusually high limits. But it is so willing to stretch to reach them and so untroubled by hard driving, you want to pin a medal on its chest.

Here, the Mazda chassis department is exploiting a famous phenomenological loophole: It is more fun to go fast in a slow car than slow in a fast car (also known as the British Leyland Rule). And while there is only so much you can do to a compact front-drive four-cylinder, mass-market car to make it fun to drive, Mazda seems to have done it to the 3.

You could start with the car's stiff, lightweight body structure—higher torsional rigidity than the previous generation, and less mass, by about 100 pounds overall. The car has some pretty fancy suspenders, too: With struts up front, multilinks in the rear and twin-tube dampers and antiroll bars front and rear, the Mazda3's kinematics are highly evolved and agreeably balanced between agility and ride comfort.

The car behaves benignly as it transfers load from one side to the other, and it is generally crisp and directional. The only frustration is that the 3's well-sorted chassis could use more athletic footwear than the 16-inch all-season radials. Even so, in second gear the 3 pulls like a baby tarpon. It has nice, dart-y steering, excellent road-holding composure corner to corner and…oh yeah, a stick shift—a slick, light, precise six-speed manual transmission. I used to love those.

‘It is so untroubled by hard driving, you want to pin a medal on its chest.’

Actually, our "Soul Red Metallic" test car was fitted with the smaller of the Mazda3's two available engines: The "i" 5-door with the Grand Touring option package (base price, $23,245) has Mazda's direct-injection 2.0-liter power plant (155 hp and 150 pound-feet of torque at 4,000 rpm) under its sculptural hood. The comparable "s" model comes with a 2.5-liter four (184/185) but costs $3,250 more.

As for our specimen, the accepted practice is to load up press cars with every possible option and powertrain upgrades, like they were being built for the Maharaja. Why did they send me the car with the little engine? Because the 6-speed manual transmission comes only with the smaller, 2.0-liter engine; and the Mazda press office—fiendish and coercive—knows automotive journalists are defenseless against small, sporty, lightweight Euro-styled five-doors with manual transmissions. If it were a diesel I'd marry it.

I suppose at this point, I must observe that the sun is setting on manual transmissions. As it should. In an era of quick-twitch mechatronics—of continuously variable transmissions, 8-speed dual-clutch transaxles, 9-speed automatics with torque converters—using a series of steel linkages to engage and disengage gears while levering the clutch in and out of the way with your foot? It is barbaric.

Sentimentalists argue that semiautomatic and automatic systems are uninvolving to drive. You want involving? We should go back to wooden wheels and cable brakes.

Look, I only read the writing on the wall. I didn't write it. Manual transmissions are, for example, slower than modern automatic and dual-clutch transmissions. Around a road course, a PDK-equipped, paddle-shifted Porsche 911 will steadily walk away from the exact same car with some stick-shifting yokel in the driver's seat. As hybrid and electric parts take up a greater percentage of powertrain duties, gearboxes themselves will become obsolete.

Manual trannies are also less fuel-efficient than other cog-swappers, and rising fuel economy standards will only marginalize manual transmissions further. The percentage of new light vehicles sold in the U.S. with manual transmissions is in the single digits. Meanwhile, only a small and aging segment of the driving population even knows how to drive a manual transmission. Go ahead, leave the keys in it: A car with a stick shift is practically immune to theft.

For these reasons and more, manual transmissions are becoming as rare as unicorns. Ferrari doesn't make a car with a manual transmission. Nor Lamborghini. Porsche and Corvette offer the mechanical curiosity of 7-speed manuals, but these are pandering and retrograde, actually sacrificing performance to nostalgia. Call it emo-engineering.

And yet, knowing manual gearboxes are doomed only made me appreciate the three-pedal Mazda3 more. Stirring first through third gears, chirping the tires, just bombing around town, the 3 was a hoot.

It is the little things: The positioning of the leather-wrapped steering wheel, small and wieldy, comfortable in the lowered position, with a direct, bolted-to-structure feel and a respectably quick rack rate. The Mazda's foot-pedal position makes it easy to cover both pedals with the right foot, that is, to heel-and-toe downshift (kids, ask granddad).

The Mazda3's new interior identity is sober, purposeful and much more richly detailed than the previous model, with dash and door inserts cast in dense sculptured urethane, premium-feeling leather on the gearshift and steering wheel, and sturdy switchgear with positive actuation. The Mazda's rotary controller sits in the console between the front seats, a light and slick-feeling aluminum knob that allows users to sweep easily among the digital animations for navigation, apps and audio.

More on Cars

As for as the exterior styling, it has to be said, no company has come so far so fast as Mazda, and the 3 is the best example. First, the new grille, with louvered detailing and a thin line of brightwork at the lower lip that spreads out, winglike, over the headlamps. Much better.

And when did this car get so willowy, so slinky? The angle of the windshield rake is bold, like an Alfa Romeo that escaped from the farm. And yet forward quarter sightlines are conspicuously good, with the front roof pillars pulled back and the side mirrors now located on the doors.

In a more practical vein, I'd direct your attention to the price tag. Our test car, a 5-door Grand Touring model clocked in at $24,635, which included a lot of low-cost desirables: heated side mirrors and moonroof; variable heating seats and keyless entry/push-button start; rearview camera with cross-traffic alert and blind-spot monitoring; a Bose audio system with nine speakers; and, front and center, above the central air vents, a 7-inch touch screen hosting an elaborate suite of navigation, audio and app functions, including Pandora.

A Ferrari? No. But the Mazda3 i GT is an affordable, desirable, and entertaining family compact. I'd call that pretty exotic.

Becoming rare but if available, there is no option enabling more apt to improve the driving experience than a manual transmission. Those hyperpriced supercars don't offer manual transmissions because the demographic that can afford them don't know how to shift.

One day cars will steer themselves, and even make turns faster and more efficiently than you. Do I want such a car? Please, no!

Another winner from Mazda. Most of their line are like this,fun sporty and good value. Mazda is the underachiever of the Japanese car companies, but they make products true to their ideals across the product line.

Presently drive a 6-speed manual ('13 Civic Si). I'm in my late 50's and grew up with manuals, however the biggest reason to buy a stick in 2014 is to avoid the computer deciding shift points and *&% throttle mapping.

I'm 1.8 miles from the office and wanted a $20K commuter car. However, all cars in that class were so dogged down in effort to compete on EPA mileage stickers, it was as if the cars were on morphine. A Ford Focus I tested outright refused to downshift until half-way up the entrance ramp -- its software interpretation of having the gas pedal floored.

With a manual I can get 17 or 34 MPG, my choice. Ramps and merging are no problem. Oh, and a cop in an unmarked Tahoe tried to goad me into racing him at a red light. Once he blew by, his exhaust sounding like a broken air hose, I stuck my gray hair out the window and called him in an 1diot. His expression was priceless.

I've had a 2008 Mazda 3 Grand touring - I just got rid of it and just in time. While a fun car to drive, sporty, reasonably priced, good gas mileage - It was just horrible in the snow and ice. I tried different tires - I think maybe the car didn't have the best weight distribution for snow and ice?We also had another problem with a leaky motor mount (which is when I learned that motor mounts had oil in them), and several electrical problems.A fun car - but it's my last Mazda for a while.

Very few ppl know how to drive a stick for sure. Took my Miata for an alignment check a few years ago & the guy who was going to do it didn't know how to drive a stick. This is supposed to be a tight job market?

I would consider one of these if new cars weren't so loaded down with electronics.

Mazda's are fun to drive. I cried when my Mazda MX-6 was totalled after an accident. That car was a dream to drive. I drive an Acura now and while incredibly reliable, it has no soul compared to the Mazda.

I'm one of those mouth breathing manual transmission lovers that can flawlessly execute a parking brake stop/start on any street in San Francisco. I'd be all over this Mazda if my current drive didn't have the aforementioned PDK.

You'd think the auto columnist would be a little more admiring of his audience than to refer to car lovers as "mouth breathers" and manual transmission drivers as "yokels." Or is that just the new way to relate to one's readers?

The dreaded Google self-driving car! Maybe if I were a harried, overworked executive who could sit in the back seat and get work done (respond to e-mails, read memos, write on my laptop) instead of driving; otherwise it sounds like a dystopian nightmare.

I am with you. Manuals are OK for routine driving on flat roads, but can be frustrating when, for example, climbing a long 5% to 7% grade in the mountains. It is easy enough to hold most automatics in a lower gear, but tricky if you don't want it to downshift just yet. No worries of this kind with a manual!

It's just Jason Gay's sense of humor. For awhile, I found his constant stream of metaphors and hyperbole to be entertaining. Now, I just find his articles tiresome and uninformative. He's to the WSJ as Robin Williams is to comedy: a person who is always "on" and never seems to realize that they wore out that routine, and their welcome, long ago. I think if he were to dial back his routine a bit, he's very capable of a thorough assessment.

Having bought the 2014 Mazda 3 for a family member, I'd say it's a significant improvement over the prior body design. Better sight lines, better cabin layout, and a more comfortable interior. I really don't think many cars in that price range are a match for the blend of excellent looks and solid gas mileage. But I'm kind of a fan of the brand.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com.