lol , man be realistic , My family can not get the land we owned 20 years ago and you still think you are the owner of the land you lost thousands of years ago .

False equivalence. A nation is not to be compared to a family. Lol at you.

We are the owners of the land, just like native Americans are to theirs. I thought you pitied the natives? Why are you contradicting yourself? Because the land thieves involve your people THIS TIME? How convenient. Look, if you hate world cultures and especially violent ones, start WITH YOUR ethnicity first and then make your way through ours.

You feel sympathy for native Americans (who were also brutish, committing savage rituals), and think they deserve their land, but you feel nothing towards Assyrians. Perhaps because of your agenda? We are competing with yous? But hey, you're the cynical one who thinks all human cultures are equally bad, so I thought naturally you would be against the referendum, just as you would be against an Assyrian one? But it seems like you won't be. Lol.

Btw, my post was slagging Assyrians, and yet you replied audaciously thinking I was having a go at your own people. I've had enough of your hypocrisy and blatant inconsistencies. Admit it, you're a Kurdish nationalist who thinks his culture is above others, even though you still feel deep shame about what they did to us 100 years ago. No wonder you replied so defensively, even though not one sentence in my post involved Kurdish hate - You are a Kurdish patriot who is proud of your history just as Assyrians are with theirs. It's okay, really. Just admit it.

Logged

It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change. - Charles Darwin

lol , man be realistic , My family can not get the land we owned 20 years ago and you still think you are the owner of the land you lost thousands of years ago .

Depends what you mean by "lost". Do you mean lost as in having our own rule of law over it or lost as in living on it?If you mean the former, that's a different story, if you mean the latter then I'll say we didn't lose it until the Ottoman-done genocides.

1-Barzani enters history with this referendum ,but there will not be any real push for independent now . Both Baghdad and Erbil will eventually reach some sort of compromises and the money will start flowing to Kurdistan and this whole issue will be put to sleep .

2-It is turkey who gave the green light for the referendum to teach the iraqi shia government a lesson after their open support to PKK and the open hostility , war of words with turkey for the last couple of year .Turkey never really objected to the referendum until it was done and Within one day of referendum a high delegation from shia led government was on turkey licking Ergogans ball and offering to compensate turkey for any damages from oil going from kurdistan to turkey . Iraqi PM is to visit turkey soon too to offer more money and a promise to never support PKK .

3-Turkey's relation with Iran was pretty much stagnated and dead due to shia vs sunni issues , but now after the referendum turkish PM will be visiting iran soon and the trade between iran and turkey will be at all time hight . Turkey's trade with Kurdistan nothing in compare to open iranian market

4-war of words and symbolic actions will continue for another few months , but war will never happen .

Hahahaha, you are a comedian. You have showen your true identity. You are not a Kurd, but a Mongoloid subhuman monkey Turk. Go back to Altai you disgusting monkey.

Barzani already entered the history as a GENOCIDAL crimina Sunni Muslim terrorist who betrayed Ezdi Kurds in Shengal. HE is washing his hands in Krudish blood. He and his tribe after his death will never be frogiven for what they did. As long Kurdish Aryan race does exist, NEVER!

Tukey 'killed' PKK, hahahaha. PKK is waging a great war against Turkey in Northern Kurdistan. What about Qandil, what about Rojava? All Turkish policies failed big time.

Turks are actually the biggest losers in this conflict, since failed Turkish state doesn't exist anymore.

Actually, the biggest regional superpower are the Aryan Persians. Persians 'won' in Syria and in Iraq. Shia Islam defeated Sunni Islam. And Iran is VERY, VERY close to a nuclear weapon. If PEsians ever get nukes, it is finished with Israel and nobody will ever can do anything about it. Nobody can attack Northern Korea because they have got nukes.

Therefore the FREE world will help the Kurds to defeat the Persians. Mongoloid Turks and Semitic Arabs are losers and can't fight against the Persians. Daesh which was a coalition of Turks, Arbas and Barzani lost the war. So Kurds and PKK are the ONLY option left for the free world to stop Iran (and Russia). In exchange Kurds will get an independent GREAT Kurdistan.

Turks are useless peace of shiiiiiiiiiiiiit. They proved he world they can't fight. They couldn't even defeat Assad, LMAO!!!. Turks lost in Syria big time!

Nobody takes those Turks seriously, important people do world politics without the Turks and without thinking about Turkey. They already exchanged/replaced Turkey for Great Kurdistan.

Independent GREAT Kurdistan, the native land of the Aryan Kurds, is very near. Since the mighty Aryan Medes, who ae our direct Aryan ancestors, the Kurds will establish the first modern Aryan state. The Medes were the first who established an Aryan Empire. Kurds were the very first and will be the last people of our homeland in Northern Mesopotamia/Western Zagros Mountains!

Hahahaha, you are a comedian. You have showen your true identity. You are not a Kurd, but a Mongoloid subhuman monkey Turk. Go back to Altai you disgusting monkey.

Barzani already entered the history as a GENOCIDAL crimina Sunni Muslim terrorist who betrayed Ezdi Kurds in Shengal. HE is washing his hands in Krudish blood. He and his tribe after his death will never be frogiven for what they did. As long Kurdish Aryan race does exist, NEVER!

Tukey 'killed' PKK, hahahaha. PKK is waging a great war against Turkey in Northern Kurdistan. What about Qandil, what about Rojava? All Turkish policies failed big time.

Turks are actually the biggest losers in this conflict, since failed Turkish state doesn't exist anymore.

Actually, the biggest regional superpower are the Aryan Persians. Persians 'won' in Syria and in Iraq. Shia Islam defeated Sunni Islam. And Iran is VERY, VERY close to a nuclear weapon. If PEsians ever get nukes, it is finished with Israel and nobody will ever can do anything about it. Nobody can attack Northern Korea because they have got nukes.

Therefore the FREE world will help the Kurds to defeat the Persians. Mongoloid Turks and Semitic Arabs are losers and can't fight against the Persians. Daesh which was a coalition of Turks, Arbas and Barzani lost the war. So Kurds and PKK are the ONLY option left for the free world to stop Iran (and Russia). In exchange Kurds will get an independent GREAT Kurdistan.

Turks are useless peace of shiiiiiiiiiiiiit. They proved he world they can't fight. They couldn't even defeat Assad, LMAO!!!. Turks lost in Syria big time!

Nobody takes those Turks seriously, important people do world politics without the Turks and without thinking about Turkey. They already exchanged/replaced Turkey for Great Kurdistan.

But , but i thought you would be happy that Barzani went ahead with referendum and he proved you wrong being a Turkish dog as you put it . Even PKK leaders are supporting him now as Qaralyan said just yesterday

But , but i thought you would be happy that Barzani went ahead with referendum and he proved you wrong being a Turkish dog as you put it . Even PKK leaders are supporting him now as Qaralyan said just yesterday

I support EVERYBODY who declares an independent Kurdistan, as an Ezdi for me it doesn't even matter where, even if independent Kurdistan is declared on the moon by Sunni Muslim monkey nigr0-allah loving Daesh.

We need a starting point, later on Kurdistan will expand gradually to all parts of Kurdistan. We need the ball get rolling. Then it will be VERY easy for GREAT Kurdistan, because in all parts of Kurdistan Kurds are the biggest majority. So our boundaries will be determined by history and where Kurds are the majority.

We use him against our enemies and after the independence we can get rid of that genocidal Sunni Muslim terrorist midget.

Barzani has no choice or big boys with big balls will get rid of him very soon.

What we need is 1 part to be independent and a voice in the UN later on all parts will follow very soon, like domino effect.

Actually it is very plausible that Rojava will be first part of Great Kurdistan that will become independent. Or it will be Shengal. Rojava is MUCH, MUCH more powerful than Bashur!

So Barzani is NOT making history at all, Rojava and Shengal are making history. Rojava and Shengal STOPPED Sunni Muslims and their gaylord allah the nigro. Barzani made history when he committed a GENOCIDE on Ezdi Kurds and he will go down in history as a GENOCIDAL extremist Sunni Muslim maniac.

Jash Talabani is dead, jash Barzani is next and I hope it will be not a natural death, but a very painful one...

So the ONLY NorthWest Iranian Aran nation in the world is Kurdish nation! And the only NorthWest Iranian Aran in the past were the mighty Aryan Medes (later known as Parthians).

1 + 1 = 2

Georgians don't speak your language family, therefore they are NOT related to you (and that's going by your 'language family relations' logic too btw). They speak a Caucasian language. They are similar to other Caucasian-speakers such as the Chechens and Circassians. They would also have genetic similarities to Russians, despite speaking a different language family. Don't claim them as your own because they are a "superior", northern race to you guys. Lol. And you say I'm the "white wannabe". Heck, Georgians and Armenians are more similar to each other than Iranians are with Georgians.

Your people are Indo-Aryan speakers. So therefore, YOU would have more similarities to South Asian peoples. But of course, since you have an inferiority complex, you would completely dismiss darker peoples being part of your race.

Pfff, you don't even understand the Kurds are NOT Indo-Aryans. Kurds are simply NorthWest Iranians. Kurds were never Indo-Aryans. You don't even know the difference between Indo-Aryan and simply NorthWest Iranians.

Georgians are heavily mixed with West Iranians, even some of their tribes came from the Iranian Plateau. That makes Georgians ARYANS, period. There are many Iranian speaking people in the Caucasus, like the Ossetians

Pfff, you don't even understand the Kurds are NOT Indo-Aryans. Kurds are simply NorthWest Iranians. Kurds were never Indo-Aryans. You don't even know the difference between Indo-Aryan and simply NorthWest Iranians.

Georgians are heavily mixed with West Iranians, even some of their tribes came from the Iranian Plateau. That makes Georgians ARYANS, period. There are many Iranian speaking people in the Caucasus, like the Ossetians

They all speak an Indo-Iranian language. Therefore, they're ALL related. Those from the southeast may be more Dravidian but they are still Iranid peoples to an extent. Just the same way Jewish Americans, who are 50%-70% European, are still SEMITIC people like us. African-looking Somalians and Ethiopians are Semitic because they speak a Semitic language. And you're surprised that Indians and Bangladeshis are considered to be "Indo-Iranians"? If Negroids can be Semitic (in which they are due to admixture), then Desi people can be Aryan/Iranid.

Indo-Iranian peoples:

Sorry, no east-European Georgians there. I mean sure, they may had been related to your immaculate race 9000 years ago. But now they have eastern European/Russian admixture, whilst Iranians would be more Arabid due to admixture. No, not all, but several amounts. I've had a lot of folks in my school who were half Iraqi/Iranian, btw.

Logged

It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change. - Charles Darwin

They all speak an Indo-Iranian language. Therefore, they're ALL related. Those from the southeast may be more Dravidian but they are still Iranid peoples to an extent. Just the same way Jewish Americans, who are 50%-70% European, are still SEMITIC people like us. African-looking Somalians and Ethiopians are Semitic because they speak a Semitic language. And you're surprised that Indians and Bangladeshis are considered to be "Indo-Iranians"? If Negroids can be Semitic (in which they are due to admixture), then Desi people can be Aryan/Iranid.

Indo-Iranian peoples:

Sorry, no east-European Georgians there. I mean sure, they may had been related to your immaculate race 9000 years ago. But now they have eastern European/Russian admixture, whilst Iranians would be more Arabid due to admixture. No, not all, but several amounts. I've had a lot of folks in my school who were half Iraqi/Iranian, btw.

Are you a retard?

Indo-Iranians and Indo-Aryans are 2 different things. Indo-Iranians are considered to be Iranid people from the Iranian Plateau.

Indians are not 'Iranic', but 'Indic'.

Iranic aka ARYAN people from the Iranian Plateau invaded India and mixed with Dravidian people there. But today people of India are considered 'INDIC' and not 'Iranic'. 'Indic' people got our language, but they are mostly 'Dravidian' people.

Georgians have nothing to do with the subhuman Eastern European people. Georgians are West ASIAN people. Their DNA is West Asian. CHG auDNA is West Asian

Assyrians are Semitic by race because they speak Semitic and claim/considered to be descendants of the ancient Semites. So Assyrians have ancient Semitic genetic roots, Semitic race and Semitic culture.Ancient Akkadians/Assyrians belonged to a Semitic race.

Assyrians are ALLROUND Semites. They belong to a Semitic race.

Many Semitic speaking in Africa and not really Semites. Some are actually former Berbers or black Africans who speak Arabic, the language of their invaders.

Afro-Asiatic IS a language group, but a branch of it 'Semitic' is a RACE.

If you study your map, you will come to a conclusion that Semitic has got its roots around the Red Sea, since there is a lot variety of other AFRO-Asiatic languages around that area. Many AFRO-Asiatic languages are just native to Africa. And Semitic evolved from Afro-Asiatic family tree. That's why it has been said that Semitic language AND race are from the Red Sea area.

But Assyrians, Arabs and Jews are all Semites and belong to a Semitic race. The difference is that Jews are SouthWest Semites, Assyrians are NorthWest Semites and Arabs are South Semites. Therefore there is some variation. But all of them are practically the same people who belong to the same Semitic race.

Same can be said about the Aryans. Aryans invaded India from the Iranian Plateau (BMAC). The language of the Indians is 'Indic', which is basically Dravidian with many Aryan/'Iranic' influences in it. Indians can be considered as Berbers.

Berbers are Afro-Asiatic but NOT Semitic. Berbers have their own Afro-Asiatic Berber race.

The relation between Berbers and Arabs (Semites) is similar to the relation between Aryans/Iranic from the Iranian Plateau and Indic people.

Damn, why is it so hard for you to accept that Assyrians belong to a Semitic race? What is wrong with you???

Indo-Iranians and Indo-Aryans are 2 different things. Indo-Iranians are considered to be Iranid people from the Iranian Plateau.

Indians are not 'Iranic', but 'Indic'.

Iranic aka ARYAN people from the Iranian Plateau invaded India and mixed with Dravidian people there. But today people of India are considered 'INDIC' and not 'Iranic'. 'Indic' people got our language, but they are mostly 'Dravidian' people.

Georgians have nothing to do with the subhuman Eastern European people. Georgians are West ASIAN people. Their DNA is West Asian. CHG auDNA is West Asian

Ouch. You feel so hurt and pissed that I told you Indians are Indo-Aryans and are of the SAME race. Love it.

Assyrians are Semitic by race because they speak Semitic and claim/considered to be descendants of the ancient Semites. So Assyrians have ancient Semitic genetic roots, Semitic race and Semitic culture.Ancient Akkadians/Assyrians belonged to a Semitic race.

Assyrians are ALLROUND Semites. They belong to a Semitic race.

Many Semitic speaking in Africa and not really Semites. Some are actually former Berbers or black Africans who speak Arabic, the language of their invaders.

Afro-Asiatic IS a language group, but a branch of it 'Semitic' is a RACE.

If you study your map, you will come to a conclusion that Semitic has got its roots around the Red Sea, since there is a lot variety of other AFRO-Asiatic languages around that area. Many AFRO-Asiatic languages are just native to Africa. And Semitic evolved from Afro-Asiatic family tree. That's why it has been said that Semitic language AND race are from the Red Sea area.

But Assyrians, Arabs and Jews are all Semites and belong to a Semitic race. The difference is that Jews are SouthWest Semites, Assyrians are NorthWest Semites and Arabs are South Semites. Therefore there is some variation. But all of them are practically the same people who belong to the same Semitic race.

Same can be said about the Aryans. Aryans invaded India from the Iranian Plateau (BMAC). The language of the Indians is 'Indic', which is basically Dravidian with many Aryan/'Iranic' influences in it. Indians can be considered as Berbers.

Berbers are Afro-Asiatic but NOT Semitic. Berbers have their own Afro-Asiatic Berber race.

The relation between Berbers and Arabs (Semites) is similar to the relation between Aryans/Iranic from the Iranian Plateau and Indic people.

Damn, why is it so hard for you to accept that Assyrians belong to a Semitic race? What is wrong with you???

Exactly. All Semitic speakers, including Somalians and Ethiopians, belong to our race.

Just the same way all Indo-Iranian speakers, such as the Assamese, Bengali and Hindi speakers, also belong to your race. Your disgust of brown peoples and your shame of your dark race wouldn't change the fact. You are more close to Indians than to Georgians and Assyrians. Quit trolling the opposite.

YOU ARE INDO-IRANIAN. JUST LIKE INDIANS AND SRI LANKANS.

Damn, why is it so hard for you to accept that Kurds belong to a Indo-Iranian race, alongside side with South Asians? What is wrong with you?

I know what's wrong with you: Inferiority complex

Logged

It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change. - Charles Darwin

You speak Indo-Iranian. Therefore you're more related to Bangladeshis, who speak your language family, than Georgians. Suck it up and don't be ashamed of your Indo-Iranian race.

Sorry that a beautiful white race of peoples such as Georgians are NOT related to you. But you don't have to troll about it. Exactly. All Semitic speakers, including Somalians and Ethiopians, belong to our race.

Just the same way all Indo-Iranian speakers, such as the Assamese, Bengali and Hindi speakers, also belong to your race. Your disgust of brown peoples and your shame of your dark race wouldn't change the fact. You are more close to Indians than to Georgians and Assyrians. Quit trolling the opposite.

LMAO.

First of all, I like Indians and have much more respect for Indians that Semitic period. I like their culture much more and their language.

Indians are INDIC, Kurds are IRANIC. What don't you understand about it?

Indians and Kurds are part of the INDO-European language family, like CELTIC, ITALIC, GERMANIC, HELLENIC people.

IRANICINDICITALICCELTICGERMANICHELLENIC

Are Indic and Italic people the same people? Both are INDO-European, but are they the same? Of course not. Indic people have different roots than Italic people. Same can be said about INDIC and IRANIC people.

ARYAN Kurds are NorthWest IRANIC people. Very different roots than INDIC people.

But yeah my ARYAN race is still closer to all other IRANIC people in SouthCentral Asia than to Semitic Assyrians. My ARYAN race has nothing to do with the Semites, period.

LMAO about the Georgians! Georgians are even much MORE West Asian than Kurds, since Kurds have some other minor non-West Asian auDNA in them. Georgians are the MOST West Asian people on this planet.

Quote

YOU ARE INDO-IRANIAN. JUST LIKE INDIANS AND SRI LANKANS.

Damn, why is it so hard for you to accept that Kurds belong to a Indo-Iranian race, alongside side with South Asians? What is wrong with you?

I know what's wrong with you: Inferiority complex

Indians are Indo-European, like Celts. What is your point??? I'm Indo-Iranian, like I'm Indo-European. It means NOTHING at all. First of all I'm NorthWest Iranic like the ancient mighty ARYAN Medes. The ARYAN Medes were also NorthWest Iranic people!

What I am for real is that I'm ARYAN aka NorthWest Iranic, like the ARYAN Medes, who were also NorthWest Iranic by race.

First of all I'm NorthWest Iranic = all NortWest Iranic people together = ARYANS = Kurds/Medeslater on as meta-group I'm just West Iranic = all West Iranic people together (Kurds + Persians) = ARYANSlater on as meta-meta-group I'm Iranic = all Iranic people together (East + West Iranic people)later on as meta-meta-meta group I'm Indo-Iranian = all Indo-Iranian people together (Iranic (ARYAN) + Indic (INDO-Aryan) )later on as meta-meta-meta-meta group I'm Indo-European = all Indo-European people together (Iranic, Indic, Celtic, Germanic, Hellenic, Armenian & Italic)

There are already 2 different steppes/stages between ARYAN, NorthWest Iranic Kurds and Indic people.

So, as you can see, Kurds have NOTHING to do with the Semitic people/race.

I've much, much, much more respect for INDIC people than for Semitic people.

You are a Semite who belongs to a Semitic race. Your ancestors were hardcore Semites. If you deny your Semitic roots, then you deny your own ancestors. If you say that your race is not Semitic, then you are NOT an Assyrian at all. Because ancient Akkadians/Assyrians were Semites, belonged to the same Semitic race like Semitic Jews and Semitic Arab.

firstly, Nineveh Plains is MINIMUM 40% Assyrian. Secondly, there's not that many Sunni Arabs in the Nineveh Plains so I'm quite confused why you bring that up.

We did discuss your 40% in an earlier post regarding "planned new province for assyrian in ninaveh plain " vs the ninaveh plain as a whole . Assyrian population does not exceed 2%d in Ninaveh plain . I'm not trying to boil your blood but Assyrian have the lowest numbers among the minority in ninevah plain . I strongly encourage you to visit and see for yourself or use simple logic . Assyrian population in the entire iraq is : 300 thousands Nineveh Governorate, Population . 3.5 millions , so even if you bring every single assyrian from every city in iraq and kurdistan they will still be less than turkmans, less than Ezidis , less than shabak , less than arabs and kurds .

Also, why do you Kurds keep bringing up NUMBERS? Numbers do not matter, what matters is the make up. If numbers matter, why would the world listen to Kurds when there's more Arabs than Kurds? Or further, why listen to you and Arabs when Chinese and Hindus make up 2+ Billion people? See I can take that logic against you.

because my dear numbers gets you votes , votes give you power to pass the laws and structure everything to your liking . The rest of the post regarding hindus , chinese is absolut non sense and has nothing to do with what we are talking about .

Thirdly, the point of the Nineveh Plains Region is to manage ourselves and be away from the Sunni Arabs. Why would we side with the same people that vastly supported ISIS?

The problem with Assyrian population is that the people and the villages are too scattered and kurds and arabs moving to their neighbourhood makes them minority in their own villages . The public land in these town and villages are distributed by the government to people who work in the government and the population in towns like Telkef or taleskof have ballooned by arabs and kurds to the point that you do not recognized it any more and you would not think for a second that it is an assyrian town . Another example is Al Hamdaniya which is pushed from east and north by kurds and south and west by arabs and if you visit it now you can never tell it is an assyrian town . Going back to your earlier point you see what numbers can do and how it changes the make up .

Lastly, separate and establish an Assyrian country? We don't want a country, what we want is autonomy. We want to rule ourselves without someone breathing down our neck.Let me take the wildest guess in the world, you're going to tell me KRG is going to give Assyrians autonomy in itself right? If that's the case, why doesn't the KRG do that right now? Is it against the constitution of Iraq and the KRG to have an autonomous sub-region within an autonomous region?region-ception?

You are asking for a pair of shoes from someone who is barefoot himself . oh .... and you yourself is against him having a pair of shoes which is really really ironic

False equivalence. A nation is not to be compared to a family. Lol at you.

Take a number lol , Turks still claim mosul is theirs , Iranian claim that Baghdad is an iranian city (historically true ) and kurds claim that Sassanide empire and the land they occupied is theirs and assyrian with 300 thousands men women and children want to claim Assyria .

I thought you pitied the natives? Why are you contradicting yourself? Because the land thieves involve your people THIS TIME? How convenient. Look, if you hate world cultures and especially violent ones, start WITH YOUR ethnicity first and then make your way through ours.

oh come on Cascade stop twisting topics to suit your agenda . The topic was the rule Christianity as a religion played in persecuting the natives and ironically you were defending and i believe still defending christian values and so called holy books and the destruction they brought .Now that it suits your agenda you bring the native issue , you realize that you are the one contradicting yourself . My views are clear and fairly simple .

1-Natives = were victimes of religious and colonial power . 2-Assyrian = They killed like there is no tomorrow and were proud of it and got punished exactly the way they punished others . 2-Do i consider Assyrian native like native American : absolutely not and it has never been proven nor it is a clear cut case like the native american , Many ethnics in iraq can make and defend the same claim . Just ask Ezidi kurd and he will bombard you with evidence . He is the expert in Genetics here , but as you know i do not care what people call themselves .

You feel sympathy for native Americans (who were also brutish, committing savage rituals), and think they deserve their land, but you feel nothing towards Assyrians. Perhaps because of your agenda? We are competing with yous? But hey, you're the cynical one who thinks all human cultures are equally bad, so I thought naturally you would be against the referendum, just as you would be against an Assyrian one? But it seems like you won't be. Lol.

You made me laugh i swear with your lack of neutrality . So the natives were brutish, committing savage rituals ? You think they were praying for the christian European to come and wipe out 30 millions of them , take their lands , resources , take their children and put the rest in reservations ?. WHO is more brutish and savage in your views ?

As for present day Assyrian i have never opposed them having an autonomy or even a country and all my posts here are prove of that . I do however question and have my doubt about that and i do not think that is doable at this stage considering that you are all abroad and with population shrinking to the non existence .

Why would i be against kurdish referendum ? There are over 5 million kurds in iraq and they have the right to establish whatever country they want to . As i said in the past and i hate repeating my self i believe it is not going to be a successful state , but still better than iraq for everyone .

Never said that , i said all our ancestors were equally thugs and criminals who built empires on the skulls of the other nations .Big difference from what you quoted me . Do not get emotional Cascade and take it easy . We are just taking

Btw, my post was slagging Assyrians, and yet you replied audaciously thinking I was having a go at your own people. I've had enough of your hypocrisy and blatant inconsistencies. Admit it, you're a Kurdish nationalist who thinks his culture is above others, even though you still feel deep shame about what they did to us 100 years ago. No wonder you replied so defensively, even though not one sentence in my post involved Kurdish hate - You are a Kurdish patriot who is proud of your history just as Assyrians are with theirs. It's okay, really. Just admit it.

1-A kurd ....yes and you know we do not chose that .2-Nationalist ....absolutely not and i detest nationalists 3-Better than others ..... we do not even have a country , so please . 4-Ashamed of crime committed by my ancestors .....absolutely yes .... aren't you ashamed of crimes committed by Assyrian ? 5-proud of my history ? the only thing i'm proud of is what i do now .The rest is non sense

Those who have power 'used' Sunni Muslims Daesh monkey traitor Barzani and now he is useless. He didn't do what he should do.

Barzani tried to fool those who replaced GREAT Kurdistan with Turkey. Barzani made a referendum possible but he doesn't want to declared independent Kurdistan. He is waiting to long. He should declare independent Kurdistan 2 weeks ago, but he is fooling the real Kurds and does what the Turanic Mongoloid Turks are telling him to do. Barzani and his Sunni Muslim people are against Great Kurdistan. And that's why he is useless now

Now, it is time that the REAL Kurds will take control over Kurdistan. Barzani and his traitor Kurds are finished. They will make place for the REAL Kurdish leaders who will build Great Kurdistan! Great Kurdistan from Amed to Kermanshah and with our Kurdish Kirkuk (land of the Aryan Guti) at the heart of it.

Kirkuk is always will be a Kurdish city, not int he hands of the Sunni Muslim genocidal terrorists Barzani/Daesh/Turkye-Erdogan

So, it will be very soon when Barzani will be replaced with a REAL Kurdish leader. Real Kurds will come to Kirkuk and will clean the mess.

Now our focus is Damascus, Baghdad, Teheran and Constantinople. The REAL ARYAN will clean all the mess of the Muslims in the Middle East.

Never forget that there are 50 !!! million Kurds. We will defeat all our enemies !!!

First of all, I like Indians and have much more respect for Indians that Semitic period. I like their culture much more and their language.

Indians are INDIC, Kurds are IRANIC. What don't you understand about it?

Indians and Kurds are part of the INDO-European language family, like CELTIC, ITALIC, GERMANIC, HELLENIC people.

IRANICINDICITALICCELTICGERMANICHELLENIC

Indic and Iranic people are both Indo-Iranians. Just like Egyptians, Ethiopians, Jews and Assyrians are Semitic.

I have nothing against Indians, Iranians and other Semites.

Quote

Are Indic and Italic people the same people? Both are INDO-European, but are they the same? Of course not. Indic people have different roots than Italic people. Same can be said about INDIC and IRANIC people.

Indic and Iranic people are a subbranch of the Indo-Iranian race, just Germans and Norwegians are of the Nordic race.

ARYAN Kurds are NorthWest IRANIC people. Very different roots than INDIC people.

Same way Ethiopians are eastern African and Assyrians are northwest Middle Easterners = BOTH are Semitic peoples.

Indians and Iranians share a close common ancestor, thus making you virtually of the same race (that common ancestor is even more recent than the Semitic one; of Assyrians and Ethiopians). Don't worry about their skin colour. Race is skin deep.

Quote

But yeah my ARYAN race is still closer to all other IRANIC people in SouthCentral Asia than to Semitic Assyrians. My ARYAN race has nothing to do with the Semites, period

And also, your race is closer to other Indo-Iranians like Indians and Pakis. Don't exclude them because they're dark brown.

But I agree with you in here.

Quote

LMAO about the Georgians! Georgians are even much MORE West Asian than Kurds, since Kurds have some other minor non-West Asian auDNA in them. Georgians are the MOST West Asian people on this planet.

Ancient Georgians were more like you, yes. But not the modern ones, who are pretty much Slavic in nature.

Quote

Indians are Indo-European, like Celts. What is your point??? I'm Indo-Iranian, like I'm Indo-European. It means NOTHING at all. First of all I'm NorthWest Iranic like the ancient mighty ARYAN Medes. The ARYAN Medes were also NorthWest Iranic people!

You are a northwest Iranic Aryan, a subbranch of the Indo-Iranian race. Indians are an Indic branch of the Indo-Iranian race. Though some would have Dravidian mixture. Still, they are Indo-Iranian in makeup. They have long, narrow noses (if hooked), high foreheads and straight hair, like many Caucasians (especially Iranic people). Dravidians have fat noses, big lips and curly hair - Many Indians and Pakis don't even look like that.

Quote

So, as you can see, Kurds have NOTHING to do with the Semitic people/race.

Nope, but they have more in common with non-Dravidian Indians and Pakistanis.

Who said Kurds and Assyrians are related anyway?

Quote

I've much, much, much more respect for INDIC people than for Semitic people.

Of course, Indic people are your fellow Aryan brothers. We are of the lesser, subhuman Afro Semitic race. Why would want you to respect Afro monkeys like us?

Quote

You are a Semite who belongs to a Semitic race. Your ancestors were hardcore Semites. If you deny your Semitic roots, then you deny your own ancestors. If you say that your race is not Semitic, then you are NOT an Assyrian at all. Because ancient Akkadians/Assyrians were Semites, belonged to the same Semitic race like Semitic Jews and Semitic Arab.

And? Same thing could be said about your Indo-Iranian people and how you all have the same roots (Indians, Nepalese, Pakis, Afghans, etc). You seem to have a problem when I shove in Pakis and Indians with your people, where you're projecting it on the Semitic race.

Logged

It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change. - Charles Darwin

Take a number lol , Turks still claim mosul is theirs , Iranian claim that Baghdad is an iranian city (historically true ) and kurds claim that Sassanide empire and the land they occupied is theirs and assyrian with 300 thousands men women and children want to claim Assyria .

Yes, and your point is?

Quote

No one is the owner of anything and you know my views about history very well . Ownership always belong to the strong and your own history is clear evident of that .

Okay, cool. Then don't tell Kurds to not take lands in northern Iraq. Leave it to the wildlife. Be consistent. That's your logic, is it not?

Quote

oh come on Cascade stop twisting topics to suit your agenda . The topic was the rule Christianity as a religion played in persecuting the natives and ironically you were defending and i believe still defending christian values and so called holy books and the destruction they brought .

I'm actually going by your feeble logic - natives own the land and that the destroyers are those who come from other lands.

Amazing that you bring up Europeans and Christians to placate and trivialized what Sunni Kurds did to Assyrians. Why are you still doing that? Lol.

Quote

1-Natives = were victimes of religious and colonial power .

Applies to modern Assyrians

Quote

2-Assyrian = They killed like there is no tomorrow and were proud of it and got punished exactly the way they punished others .

They have killed a lot of people (if you're talking about 2000 years ago Lol), and maybe we got our comeuppance after that (the following 2000 years). But let's face it, we went through a lot in the past century. It's disgusting and inhumane of you to wish more Assyrian deaths and suffering. And if you that sick thought, I suggest you see a therapist.

Quote

2-Do i consider Assyrian native like native American : absolutely not and it has never been proven nor it is a clear cut case like the native american , Many ethnics in iraq can make and defend the same claim . Just ask Ezidi kurd and he will bombard you with evidence . He is the expert in Genetics here , but as you know i do not care what people call themselves .

Thank you for outing yourself as an anti-Assyrian and history-denyer. Just say Assyrians don't exist and that we're gypsies, Arab (or whatever BS you guys come up with). Actually, Ezidi Kurd acknowledges our existence. He traces us to ancient Akkadians/Assyrians. I only don't agree with him when he says we're part of a "Semitic race". Even he hasn't stooped as low as you did. Look, you're a typical Assyrian-hating Sunni Kurd. I guess. I should've known. But I was too nice and naïve I guess.

Quote

You made me laugh i swear with your lack of neutrality . So the natives were brutish, committing savage rituals ? You think they were praying for the christian European to come and wipe out 30 millions of them , take their lands , resources , take their children and put the rest in reservations ?. WHO is more brutish and savage in your views ?

Native Americans were brutal, just like Medieval Europeans. Whether Europeans were savages too or not, is not the point anyway. Clearly you haven't read about child sacrifices and other violent rituals they had. Again, you have a pathetic and blatant agenda: "Because Christian Europeans and ancient Assyrians were savages, Islamic Kurds/Turks shouldn't be ruled out. Oh and native Americans are pacifist and harmless". Try again. Lol.

Quote

As for present day Assyrian i have never opposed them having an autonomy or even a country and all my posts here are prove of that . I do however question and have my doubt about that and i do not think that is doable at this stage considering that you are all abroad and with population shrinking to the non existence .

You just said you don't want Assyrians to have an autonomy because they're a small amount. How is that reasonable?

Quote

Why would i be against kurdish referendum ? There are over 5 million kurds in iraq and they have the right to establish whatever country they want to . As i said in the past and i hate repeating my self i believe it is not going to be a successful state , but still better than iraq for everyone .

If you read my posts properly you'd also be aware about the fact that I too wasn't against the referendum. But you were the one who was talking about natives and aboriginals, and how they deserve their land. It was hypocritical of you to dismiss the fact that even Kurdistan is a stolen nation. But that was convenient since it's your country

Quote

Never said that , i said all our ancestors were equally thugs and criminals who built empires on the skulls of the other nations .Big difference from what you quoted me . Do not get emotional Cascade and take it easy . We are just taking

Um, that was my point? You think all cultures were equally bad, Assyrians and Kurds. So why be against Assyrians ONLY and say nothing about Kurds? I'm just going by your own logic. If you what to be fair and consistent with your own logic, then also speak ill of Kurds? You're the emotional one here. All your recent posts on this forum are about Assyrians and how much you're fed up with them. Seriously, stop backpedaling and being a hypocrite..

Quote

1-A kurd ....yes and you know we do not chose that .2-Nationalist ....absolutely not and i detest nationalists 3-Better than others ..... we do not even have a country , so please . 4-Ashamed of crime committed by my ancestors .....absolutely yes .... aren't you ashamed of crimes committed by Assyrian ? 5-proud of my history ? the only thing i'm proud of is what i do now .The rest is non sense

1. Okay. Same here.2. Okay, but why are you being defensive about Assyrians and their ramblings about Kurds?3. So peoples without a country are not supposed to feel proud of themselves?4. Time is a virtue here. Kurds and Turks committed such acts within the last century. We were savages 1500-2000 years ago. Brutal empire, yes, but it was too long ago.4. Fair enough.

Logged

It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change. - Charles Darwin

Ethiopians are not Semitic, but 'Kush!tic'. Semites and Kush!tes are part of meta AFRO-Asiatic family group.

This fact doesn't make Semitic Assyrians less NorthWest Semitic people. Semites don't cluster with Aryan, never did and never will!

Indo-Iranian race doesn't exist. It is Iranic race and Indic race. Ancient Indo-Iranian evolved into modern Iranic people and Indic people. Once again, Indians are not Indo-Iranian, but imply Indo-Aryan!! Genetically Indo-Aryans are very different from ancient Indo-Iranians.

Aryans (Kurds) and Dravidians (Indic) people share some (Iranian Plateau) ancestors, but not ALL ancestors. Iranian Plateau ARYAN migrated into India.

Modern Georgians have nothing to do with the Slavic subhumans. When we compare modern Georgian auDNA, modern Georgians (and other Caucasus people) cluster the closest to Kurds/Iranians.

here is the evidence that Georgias are very close to West Iranic people. (Georgians are green cross and Iranians are blue square). Kurds cluster between Georgians and Iranians

I don't care about Indians and never denied genetic links between Iranic and Indic people.

But Indians belong to an INDIC (INDO-Aryan) race and Kurds to NorthWest Iranian (Aryan) race.

NorthWest Iranic Medes, like SouthWest Iranic Persians, called themselves ARYANS. This is a fact.

Who are both Indo-Iranians. Doesn't mean their "Indic" and "Aryan" title should be stripped off, though. So don't panic.

Quote

Ethiopians are not Semitic, but 'Kush!tic'. Semites and Kush!tes are part of meta AFRO-Asiatic family group.

Many Ethiopians speak Amharic, a Semitic language. So they're Semites. We share a common ancestor with them, just like Nepalese and Indians do with Iranic peoples.

Who cares if they're "black" or "brown". Let's no be ashamed of our darker relatives.

Quote

This fact doesn't make Semitic Assyrians less NorthWest Semitic people. Semites don't cluster with Aryan, never did and never will!

What the hell is wrong with you? Who said that we cluster with Aryans? Please learn how to read.

Quote

Indo-Iranian race doesn't exist. It is Iranic race and Indic race. Ancient Indo-Iranian evolved into modern Iranic people and Indic people.

Therefore making you a broad race of peoples. Just because the Indian guy is brown doesn't mean he is not of your race. At least you admit that ancient Iranians evolved into modern Indians and Iranians. I commend you for acknowledging that. We are getting somewhere now.

Quote

Once again, Indians are not Indo-Iranian, but imply Indo-Aryan!! Genetically Indo-Aryans are very different from ancient Indo-Iranians.

Your disgust of "n!ggers" wouldn't change this fact. You just loath the fact that swarthy people are related to you. This is not a good excuse.

Non-Dravidian Indians (those from the north) are part of your race. You are all part of the Indo-Iranian race. Aryan and Indic are just subraces of Indo-Iranian.

Aryans (Kurds) and Dravidians (Indic) people share some (Iranian Plateau) ancestors, but not ALL ancestors. Iranian Plateau ARYAN migrated into India.

Why the heck are you equating Indic people with Dravidians? Not all Indians have a strong Dravidian admixture.

Like I told you, Dravidians have thick hair, flat noses, small foreheads and black skin. A lot of Indians, who are dark brown, have Iranid features (narrow or hooked noses, straight hair, high foreheads). The only difference is that they're brown.

Quote

Modern Georgians have nothing to do with the Slavic subhumans. When we compare modern Georgian auDNA, modern Georgians (and other Caucasus people) cluster the closest to Kurds/Iranians.

Trust me, they have eastern European roots here and there. But modern ones are more closely clustered with Circassians, Chechens and other Caucasian ethnic groups near Russia. They're just slightly related to Iranians.

Look man, Iranians are usually very swarthy and Arab looking. Georgians are not. The latter look very European. Their images say a thousand words. It doesn't matter if yous clustered close to each other a few millenias ago. Today, Georgians look distinctly European, namely like Greeks and Macedonians.

Quote

here is the evidence that Georgias are very close to West Iranic people. (Georgians are green cross and Iranians are blue square). Kurds cluster between Georgians and Iranians

Again, this diagram is based from 9000 years ago. Doesn't apply for today's races.

Wait, why is the Iranian race also clustering with Jews (pink) and Druze (purple) peoples? They're as close to yous as Georgians are. Hm?

Quote

I don't care about Indians and never denied genetic links between Iranic and Indic people.

You just did that above.

Quote

But Indians belong to an INDIC (INDO-Aryan) race and Kurds to NorthWest Iranian (Aryan) race.

That's like saying Assyrians and Lebanese people belong to one race, and North Africans to another - The former is just part of a subbranch called Levantine and the latter is Egyptian/Maghreb subrace. Still broadly Semitic with recent common ancestors.

You, Pakistanis, Afghans and Indians = All Indo-Iranian. Now one is Aryan and the other is Indic. They're STILL part of the umbrella race of INDO-IRANIAN.

Quote

NorthWest Iranic Medes, like SouthWest Iranic Persians, called themselves ARYANS. This is a fact.

Who are both Indo-Iranians. Doesn't mean their "Indic" and "Aryan" title should be stripped off, though. So don't panic.

Doesn't mean anything. Both are also Indo-European.

Once again there is no such thing as modern day Indo-Iranians. Those people evolved into Aryans (Iranics) and Indo-Aryans.

Quote

Many Ethiopians speak Amharic, a Semitic language. So they're Semites. We share a common ancestor with them, just like Nepalese and Indians do with Iranic peoples.

No matter what, Assyrians are still Semitic and belong to a Semitic race. Nobody can change this fact.

Quote

Who cares if they're "black" or "brown". Let's no be ashamed of our darker relatives.

I'm not ashamed of anything. I'm the darkest person in my family, so what? I'm still a Kurd and NorthWest Iranic.

Quote

Therefore making you a broad race of peoples. Just because the Indian guy is brown doesn't mean he is not of your race. At least you admit that ancient Iranians evolved into modern Indians and Iranians. I commend you for acknowledging that. We are getting somewhere now.

Indic is not the same as IRANIC.

My dark Indo-European relatives the Indians don't belong to an Iranic (Aryan) race. They belong to an Indic race.

Quote

Your disgust of "n!ggers" wouldn't change this fact. You just loath the fact that swarthy people are related to you. This is not a good excuse.

Do you have some issues or what? Indians are not from Africa. Indo-Iranian are NOT from Africa. While Afro-Asiatic is from Africa.

Africa belongs to n!ggers.

Indians have nothing to do with Africa, while Semitic people are connected to Africa and therefore to n!ggers.

Quote

Non-Dravidian Indians (those from the north) are part of your race. You are all part of the Indo-Iranian race. Aryan and Indic are just subraces of Indo-Iranian.

Ancient Indo-Iranians don't exist. Today we have got Iranics (ARYANS) and Indics (INDO-Aryans). We are related to each other because Aryans from the Iranian Plateau invaded India.

Quote

Why the heck are you equating Indic people with Dravidians? Not all Indians have a strong Dravidian admixture.

Modern Indic languages are closer to Dravidian than to ancient Sanskrit. Indic languages are hybrid languages between Sanskrit and Dravidian.

Quote

Like I told you, Dravidians have thick hair, flat noses, small foreheads and black skin. A lot of Indians, who are dark brown, have Iranid features (narrow or hooked noses, straight hair, high foreheads). The only difference is that they're brown.

Indians are not from Africa. Afro-Asiatic people are.

Quote

Trust me, they have eastern European roots here and there. But modern ones are more closely clustered with Circassians, Chechens and other Caucasian ethnic groups near Russia. They're just slightly related to Iranians.

Look man, Iranians are usually very swarthy and Arab looking. Georgians are not. The latter look very European. Their images say a thousand words. It doesn't matter if yous clustered close to each other a few millenias ago. Today, Georgians look distinctly European, namely like Greeks and Macedonians. Again, this diagram is based from 9000 years ago. Doesn't apply for today's races.

You can read the diagram. This diagram is based on MODERN people. Modern population is represented here. Kurds/Persians and Caucasians cluster very close to each other. Kurds are not mentioned in this academic diagram but Kurds can even overlap with people from Caucasus.

Kurds are more shifted toward Caucasus than Persians, but that is because of geography. Kurds are NorthWest Iranic and Persians are SouthWest Iranic. Kurds cluster between Adygeians (descendants of Maykop culture people) and Persians.

Quote

Wait, why is the Iranian race also clustering with Jews (pink) and Druze (purple) peoples? They're as close to yous as Georgians are. Hm?

Jews, Turks etc. are not representative. Those are very mixed people. Those Jews are from Caucasus and Iran. And those Jews overlap with Armenians. And those Jews are even closer to Armenians than to Kurds/Persians. They are heavily mixed with people from Iran/Caucasus and Anatolia. Still, they have a different distinguish cluster which doesn't overlap with Aryans. Jews from Levant are even much more away from Caucasus/Iran.

Quote

You just did that above.That's like saying Assyrians and Lebanese people belong to one race, and North Africans to another - The former is just part of a subbranch called Levantine and the latter is Egyptian/Maghreb subrace. Still broadly Semitic with recent common ancestors.

Assyrians belong to a NorthWest Semitic race. Berbers are not even Semites. Semites and Berbers belong to a meta Afro-Asiatic group, though. Like Kurds and Indians belong to a Indo-Iranian meta group.

But I'm sure that genetic distance between Assyrians and North-Africans is smaller than genetic distance between Kurds and Indians....

Do you have some issues or what? Indians are not from Africa. Indo-Iranian are NOT from Africa. While Afro-Asiatic is from Africa.

You must have horrible comprehension skills. Nobody said Indians are from Africa. But Dravidians tend to have "Negroid" features, just like Papua New Guineans do and a few native Indian Ocean islanders. Doesn't mean they're African. But they can be easily confused for Africans.

Quote

Indians have nothing to do with Africa, while Semitic people are connected to Africa and therefore to n!ggers.

Of course we're more closer to Africans than you guys will ever be. But, somehow, you're not accepting the fact that your race has close genetic ties with Indians too.

Quote

Ancient Indo-Iranians don't exist. Today we have got Iranics (ARYANS) and Indics (INDO-Aryans). We are related to each other because Aryans from the Iranian Plateau invaded India.

At least you admit there is a link between Aryans and Indians.

Quote

You can read the diagram. This diagram is based on MODERN people. Modern population is represented here. Kurds/Persians and Caucasians cluster very close to each other. Kurds are not mentioned in this academic diagram but Kurds can even overlap with people from Caucasus.

Kurds are distinguishable from Caucasians. They look Middle Eastern. They're even culturally Middle Eastern. I don't think people would 23andme Kurds and associate them with Caucasian people. Nobody cares about DNA. They judge you by face-value. Again, you are ashamed that your neighbours are western Asians. So you try hard basing your race on the Caucasus region as hard as you want to. I guess I wouldn't blame you, because the Middle East has got a bad rap.

Quote

Jews, Turks etc. are not representative. Those are very mixed people. Those Jews are from Caucasus and Iran. And those Jews overlap with Armenians. And those Jews are even closer to Armenians than to Kurds/Persians. They are heavily mixed with people from Iran/Caucasus and Anatolia. Still, they have a different distinguish cluster which doesn't overlap with Aryans. Jews from Levant are even much more away from Caucasus/Iran.

You see what you want to see. Even your diagram tells you that Druze and Jews (Semites) are related to you. But because of your inferiority complex, you exhibit and approve of the Georgians (and Georgia is usually categorised under Eastern Europe in a few atlases). You are amazing.

Quote

Assyrians belong to a NorthWest Semitic race. Berbers are not even Semites. Semites and Berbers belong to a meta Afro-Asiatic group, though. Like Kurds and Indians belong to a Indo-Iranian meta group.

Who was talking about Berbers? There are Arabic speaking peoples in Morocco, Tunisia and Libya. They're all Semites. But they're more Negroid than Middle Eastern Semites. Just like Indians are more Dravidian Indo-Iranians than Kurds.

Quote

But I'm sure that genetic distance between Assyrians and North-Africans is smaller than genetic distance between Kurds and Indians....

Perhaps, because many North Africans do share the same skin tone as we do, except that they have broader noses and really curly hair. Whilst Indians are usually very brown in comparison to Iranian peoples, especially Kurds (who are the lightest Iranian ethnicity).

Logged

It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change. - Charles Darwin

You must have horrible comprehension skills. Nobody said Indians are from Africa. But Dravidians tend to have "Negroid" features, just like Papua New Guineans do and a few native Indian Ocean islanders. Doesn't mean they're African. But they can be easily confused for Africans.

You are the one who come every time with retard statements. Are Dravidians Indo-Iranian at the first place?

I don't know were those Dravidians are from and who they are, but they are not African and not from Africa.

While Afro-Asiatic group, which Semitic is part of, is directly from Africa.

Your people are related to n!ggers in A F R I C A .

You must make your mind very fast. Are Kurds now Dravidian people or Middle Eastern people? hahahahaha.

Pfff, you have got such a looser mentality. Very similar to other Semites.

All I know is that Kurds are DIRECT descendants of the mighty ARYAN Medes.

Like modern day Kurds, the Medes were Aryan aka NorthWest Iranic people.

The Medes were NorthWest Iranic like the Kurds. And not SouthWest Iranic, Eastern Iranic, Indic, Indo-Iranian, Dravidian etc. lol.

The mighty Aryan Medes were always evolved NorthWest Iranic people and they looked exactly like Kurds. Aryan Kurds never lost their 'Aryan/NorthWest Iranic Medes look'...

If you want to see know how a Mede looked like and want to see a Mede in real life. Go and see the real Kurds like me. When I look at the mirror and smile I see an Aryan Mede smiling back to me. I look deep into the ancient Aryan history and see the history of my people in the mirror.