BREAKING NEWS: Zimmerman's Bond Revoked by Judge.

The judge has revoked George Zimmerman's bond due to lying about how much money he and his wife had to post bond, and for having two passports, the second he obtained by saying the first passport was lost. He must report to authorities in 48 hours. Justified or not?

Top Opinion

Quite justified. Zimmerman is a threat to the community and should not be roaming free in case he happens to see another innocent black teenager committing the horrendous crime of walking down a street and decides to "protect" the community.

Justified!! First he knowingly lies and claims his wife was indigent. Only for the judge to find out threw taped recordings that Zimmerman knew roughly what he had. This guy needs serious lessons in critical thinking. He is a horrible decision maker.

I was hoping someone would bring this up. He is a murderer, he needs to be in jail until his trial. And go from there. If he is found innocent, he will end up getting in trouble again. He is that type. I hope he doesn't reproduce.

OHHHH let's hear again from all of the Farside who praise this symbol of "Nitwitism" and "Second Amendment Insanity". Want to hear some screams for help again?
Maybe someone will record the "General Population Cellblock" tomorrow night. Listen
for it.

The identity behind the screams for help came out inconclusive. If two media paid analysts figured it was Zimmerman, why couldn't the FED? So we assume the one without injuries (except for the obvious one) is screaming for help for nearly a minute? Yeah, nitwitism.

Come on, seriously? They didn't even see the fight. Pure conjecture. None of them know of anything that occurred, yet they already convinced themselves of the truth.

Look at the attorney's statements. How can that even be believable? If Zimmerman kept this young man at gun point, crying help for nearly a minute, then he should be shot in the head at this moment for being one the lousiest murderers in history.

Depends on the circumstances presented in court. There is more evidence that needs to be presented in order to make this case not appear as self defense on the part of Zimmerman, and it doesn't matter to me what color the individuals are. Simple as that.

One person is bloodied/injured. The other is dead. That in my county is justifiable deadly force. Since this went to court, the case hinges on the evidence proving Zimmerman initiated the confrontation and did not attempt to retreat. It might also depend on whether he gave Martin the opportunity to retreat upon presenting the weapon, he must show that Martin had no intention of giving up the fight. That's if he initiated the fight.

Justified? Going by the way it was presented by the prosecutor, you can say that. Then again, I don't agree with anything this prosecutor has done so far. None of this information will be relevant to the actual murder case, so I don't see how it matters. There is still the situation that once he is in front of the judge again that he will be granted bail once more.

Incorrect. He turned in the first passport. His lawyer had the second one. If you are claiming collusion between his attorney and Zimmerman, pass on the information you have onto the state prosecutor. They would love to know.

I think you believe the jury are viewers on a CSI show. This isn't a fricking game. Not everything is going to be allowed in court. Not your opinion, not the kind of gum Zimmerman might have been chewing, whether it was Nicorette, not even this. It is irrelevant to the murder case. It might matter to the judge who will decide if this should see trial, not the jury.

Lied? He was never asked about the paypal account. It is difficult to lie when you are not asked. Like I mentioned elsewhere, you don't introduce information that is not asked. Did he correct his wife on the estimates in the account? Did he have that much of an intimate knowledge on the amount in the account? He should have been asked. He wasn't. The judge claimed he was like a potted plant. Did he expect Zimmerman to shout "NO! THATS NOT TRUE SHELLIE!"

You can make the case that his wife withheld information. She'll have to explain her actions. I for one don't believe De La Rionda is being honest here. He claims the court was made to believe he didn't have a penny. Obviously, not true.

Also, I don't think you've ever taken his side...so don't feign impartiality. Nothing he says will be true to you. Accepting this notion is the first step in understanding that youre biased. It's ok.