Shrimpton was a speaker at a forum, date unknown, but probably sometime in
2008 (more on this later). Beginning at the 1:42 mark of the video below,
Shrimpton dropped a bombshell about Obama.

Shrimpton made the following startling claims:

Although Barack Hussein Obama (BHO) is said to have been born on August
4, 1961, he actually was born in 1960.

Obama’s alleged mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was not pregnant in July
1961.

Although BHO is said to have been born in Honolulu, Hawaii, he actually
was born in Mombasa, Kenya, which was then British territory, which
means British intelligence has his records.

The C.I.A. surreptiously took a DNA sample of Obama at a fundraising
dinner and ran a test, but could not match Obama’s DNA with his
[maternal] grandparents, the Dunhams.

Former New York governor and GOP presidential aspirant Rudy Giuliani
told Shrimpton at a recent lunch that he (Giuliani) knows all about
this. Giuliani had hoped he would be the GOP presidential candidate and
he’d then use the information against the Democrats.

The Clintons (Bill and Hillary) also know about this.

For the rest of the 1½ hour video, Shrimpton talked about British politics
and the European Union. However, at the 1:09:30 mark, a man in the
audience asked Shrimpton a question about Obama and Kenya. In his response,
beginning at about the 1:11:55 mark, Shrimpton alluded to the 2008 U.S.
presidential campaign as if it was ongoing as he spoke, which suggests that
the forum took place in 2008. Shrimpton also made these additional claims:

He believes, given the above British intelligence on the year (1960, not
1961) and place (Kenya, not USA) of Obama’s birth, Obama would “soon be
pressured into withdrawing” from the presidential race. With the benefit
of hindsight, we of course know that didn’t happen.

Senator John Edwards also knows because Shrimpton had briefed him.

Former CIA director (under Bill Clinton) also knows. Shrimpton does not
name him. Clinton had 3 successive CIA directors: James Woolsey, John
Deutsch, and George Tenet.

British Intelligence knows because MI5 got the Nairobi Special
Intelligence files when Kenya became independent.

Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations from 1997 to 2006,
also knows.

Shrimpton also said something very strange — that Obama’s half-sister is
actually his full sister, and that the sister is “missing.” (The only
“half sister” of Obama about whom we are told isMaya
Soetoro-Ng, the daughter of Stanley Ann Dunham and her
Indonesian husband, Lolo Soetoro.)

IN OTHER WORDS, JUST ABOUT EVERY FRIGGING POLITICIAN IN THE UNITED STATES
AND THE WORLD KNOWS. AND EVERY FRIGGING ONE OF THEM HAS BEEN LYING TO THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE. EVEN WORSE, THEY MOCK AND DEMONIZE US, CALLING US CRAZY
CONSPIRACY “BIRTHERS”.

RATE THIS:

Natural-born citizens are also those born outside the United States and its
outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States
and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying
possessions prior to the birth of the child.

Hence, a child born abroad to two US citizen parents is a natural-born citizen:
Provided, That at least one citizen parent had previously resided in the United
States or one of its outlying possessions. U.S. Code: Title 8, 1401.

Where are:

1 Certified copy of original birth certificate
2 Columbia University transcripts
3 Columbia thesis paper
4 Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5 Harvard University transcripts
6 Illinois State Senate records
7 Illinois State Senate schedule
8 Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9 Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mother
10 Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11 Occidental College Transcripts
12 Parent’s marriage Certificate
13 Record of baptism
14 Selective Service registration records
15 Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16 Passport records for all passports
17 Scholarly articles
18 SAT and LSAT test scores
19 Access to his grandmother in Kenya
20 List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists
21 Punahou grade school records
22 Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii
Department of Education.
23 Page 11 of Stanley Ann Dunham’s divorce decree.
24 Why did Barack Obama resign from the Illinois bar and where are all of the
relevant documents?
25 Why did Michelle Obama resign from the Illinois bar after only about four
years of practice and where are all of the relevant documents?

You gotta admit this is a lot of hidden information concerning the life of a
sitting President. It’s only natural to wonder why Obama and his handlers
consider it vital to hide so much personal information from the public.

VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP
CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT

AP - WASHINGTON D.C. Tuesday, February 19, 2013

<!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->In
a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the
presidency, the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has Released copies
of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental College ... Released
today, the transcript school indicates that Obama, under the name Barry
Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an
undergraduate.

The transcript was released by Occidental College in
compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior
Court of California. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for
financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the
Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a
student must claim <!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->foreign
citizenship.

This document would seem to provide the smoking gun
that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that
he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US
citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news has created a firestorm
at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama's
legitimacy and qualification to serve as President article titled, "Obama
Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow
economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U. K.

In a related matter, under growing pressure from
several groups, Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court
agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to
serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey . This
lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as
president. Donofrio's case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding
proof of Obama's citizenship or qualification to serve as president.

Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation
has released the results of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending.
This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign
funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to
block disclosureof any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the
investigation is still ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the
U.S. Attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the
matter...

LET OTHER FOLKS KNOW THIS NEWS,
THE MEDIA WON'T!

Subject: RE: Issue of Passport?

While I've little interest in getting in the middle
of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes
the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: What passport
did he use when he was shuttling between New York, Jakarta, and Karachi?

So how did a young man who arrived in New York in
early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come
up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later? And once he was
on a plane, shuttling between New York, Jakarta, and Karachi, what passport was
he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration? The American people
not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It
makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.

Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981,
at age 20?

A: Yes, by his own admission.

Q: What passport did he travel under?

A: There are only three possibilities.

1) He traveled with a U.S. ...
Passport,

2) He traveled with a British
passport, or

3) He traveled with an Indonesian
passport.

Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled
with a U.S. Passport in 1981?

A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan
was on the U.S. . State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.

Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he
was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he
were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born
in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims.. And if he were
traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he
relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior
to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.

Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people
need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between
1981 and 2008.

Given the destructive nature of his plans for
America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous
spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all
this, the better.

If you don't care that Your President is not a
natural born Citizen and in Violation of the Constitution, then Delete this, and
then lower your American Flag to half-staff, because the U.S. Constitution is
already on life-support, and won't survive much longer.

If you do care then Forward this to as many
patriotic Americans as you can, because our country is being looted and
ransacked!

Re: Secret Service uncovers Tea Party plot to kidnap President

MY DADDY IS A DANCER

One day a fourth-grade teacher asked the
children what their fathers did for a living.

All the typical answers came up - fireman,
mechanic, businessman, salesman... and so forth.

However, little Justin was being
uncharacteristically quiet, so when the teacher prodded him about his father, he
replied, "My father's an exotic dancer in a gay cabaret and takes off all his
clothes to music in front of other men

and they put money in his underwear.

Sometimes, if the offer is really good, he
will go home with some guy and stay with him all night for money."

The teacher, obviously shaken by this
statement, hurriedly set the other children to work on some exercises

and took little Justin aside to ask him, "Is
that really true about your father?"

"No," the boy said, "He works for the
Democratic National Committee and helped to get Obama elected,

but it's too embarrassing for me to have to
say that in front of the other kids."

US Constitution

�4. No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of
the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constituti�on, shall be
eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to
that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-fiv�e years, and
been fourteen years a resident within the United States.�

Natural-born Citizen

Natural-born citizens of the United States are those who are citizens of the
United States from birth without having to perform any act to acquire or perfect
their American citizenship. These are those whose parents are citizens of the
United States at the time of their birth.

Natural-born American citizens are those born of American citizen parents,
within or without the American Republic, provided in the latter case that one of
the parents had resided in the United States prior to the birth of the child.

Their American citizenship is natural, the result of parentage, and not
artificial

or acquired by compliance with legislative provisions.

A natural-born citizen is one not made by law or otherwise, but born. And this
class is the large majority, in fact, the mass of our citizens; all others are
exceptions specially provided for by law.

A natural-born citizen is defined as one whose citizenship is established by the
jurisdiction which the United States already has over the parents of the child,
not what is thereafter acquired by choice of residence in this country.

It is not necessary that a man should be born in this country, to be "a natural
born citizen." It is only requisite he should be a citizen by birth, and that is
the case with all the children of citizens who have ever resided in this
country, though born in a foreign country.

Natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens and naturalized citizens,
are

those born in the United States of parents who are citizens.

Natural-born citizens are also those born outside the United States and its
outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States
and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying
possessions prior to the birth of the child.

Hence, a child born abroad to two US citizen parents is a natural-born citizen:
Provided, That at least one citizen parent had previously resided in the United
States or one of its outlying possessions. U.S. Code: Title 8, 1401.

WHICH birth certificate is correct?

The one released in 2008?

Or the one released April 27, 2010, three years too late, only after Donald
Trump Forced His Hand

BOTH proved ONE thing: In no way, shape, or form can obama claim the
title of "natural-born citizen".

Tricky wording, on "birth
certificate".

This seems only to prove he's the fraud he has
been--

still suckering the American People

The problem
with this "new" birth certificate is that it's well....new.
It lists his birthday as August 4, 1961, then list's his fathers
native country as Kenya.

Kenya didn't exist as a country until
1963, it was British East Africa or East Africa Protectorate
until then.

The
hospital of his birth is listed as Kapi'olani Maternity and
Gynecological Hospital, which didn't exist until 1978. Prior to
that time it was Kauaikeolani Children's Hospital.

His
race is listed as African. In the 60's his race would be
listed as Negro.

"I
certify this is a true copy or
abstract of the record on
file in the Hawaii Department of State Health".

Being
an abstract does not mean it real or official, it
means it matches what is in the electronic system, which
would have been put in some time after 1978 because of
the hospital name, and as recently as April 25, 2011,
because of the date, or any time in between.

And this is BEFORE His Following Slurs Against God Almighty Himself

General Bill Ginn' USAF (ret.) asked Obama to explain WHY he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played. The General stated to Obama that according to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171:

During rendition of the national anthem, when the flag is displayed, all present (except those in uniform) are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. Or, at the very least, "Stand and Face It".

Senator Obama replied: "As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides". "There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression.." "The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all that sort of thing."

Obama continued: "The National Anthem should be 'swapped' for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song 'I'd Like To Teach the World To Sing'. If that were our anthem, then, I might salute it. In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as 'redesign' our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love. It's my intention, if elected, to disarm America to the level of acceptance to our Middle East Brethren. If we, as a Nation of waring people, conduct ourselves like the nations of Islam, where peace prevails - - - perhaps a state or period of mutual accord could exist between our governments ..."

When I become President, I will seek a pact of agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive thoughts. We as a Nation, have placed upon the nations of Islam, an unfair injustice which is WHY my wife disrespects the Flag and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past".

"Of course now, I have found myself about to become the President of the United States and I have put my hatred aside . I will use my power to bring CHANGE to this Nation, and offer the people a new path..My wife and I look forward to becoming our Country's First black Family. Indeed, CHANGE is about to overwhelm the United States of America "

I lived at 105 Nawiliwili for 3 years and drove right by 6805 Kalanianaole
Highway, Honolulu, HI, almost every day, and sometimes two or three times a day.
I also drove right by the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children at
1319 Punahou St which is another 8 miles down Kapiolani Highway.

I used to eat at a restaurant which is now called Outback Steak House at
6650 Kalanianaole Hwy. I also used to eat at Roy's Honolulu at
6600 Kalanianaole Highway, which was exactly 1.4 miles from home. I got my
teeth cleaned at the Hawaii Kai Clinic which is at 6700 Kalanianaole Hwy # 111

Judge Carter: Show Proof of Citizenship January 26, 2010

CORRECTION: A correction on this story was published on
Sunday, Jan. 15, 2006: Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was born in Honolulu on
Aug. 4, 1961. A Page One story last Sunday contained incorrect information about
his birthplace.

AP declared
Obama �s "Kenyan-Born"

John Charlton
The Post & Email
October 16, 2009What
most people know is that the Associated Press (AP) is one of the
largest, internationally recognized, syndicated news services.
What most people don't know that is in 2004, the AP was a "birther"
news organization.How
so? Because in a syndicated report, published Sunday, June 27,
2004, by the Kenyan Standard Times, and which was, as of this
report, available at
http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htmThe
AP reporter stated the following:

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to
take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack
Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over
lurid sex club allegations.

This
report explains the context of the oft cited debate, between Obama
and Keyes in the following Fall, in which Keyes faulted Obama for
not being a "natural born citizen", and in which Obama, by his quick
retort, "So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the
presidency", self-admitted that he was not eligible for the office.
Seeing that
an AP reporter is too professional to submit a story which was not
based on confirmed sources (ostensibly the Obama campaign in this
case), the inference seems inescapable: Obama himself was putting
out in 2004, that he was born in Kenya.The
difficulty in finding this gem of a story is hampered by Google,
which is running flak for Obama: because if you search for
"Kenyan-born US Senate" you wont find it, but if you search for the
phrase without quotes you will find links which talk about it.For
those who believe what they see, here is the screen capture of the
page from the Kenyan Sunday Standard, electronic edition, of June
27, 2004 �s Just in case that page is scrubbed from the Web Archive:

Readers should take note that this AP story, was syndicated
world-wide, so you should be able to find it in major newspapers,
archived in libraries world-wide. If any reader does this,
please let
The Post & Email know, so that we can publish a
follow up-story. You can scrub the net, but scrubbing
libraries world-wide is not so easy.

Hanen of Sentinel Blog Radio
broke the public news of the existence of this AP story
at on October 14, 2009 at 12:31 pm. However, The Post
& Email can confirm that a professional
investigator had uncovered this story months ago, and that
certified and authenticated copies of this report, meeting
Federal Rules of evidence, have already been prepared and
archived at many locations nationwide.

Supported Only By Easily Beguiled
Whores Who "Think" Being an
"Advisor" to a Law Professor Represents "Genius".

4. No person except a natural born citizen, or a
citizen of the
United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall
be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be
eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of
thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the
United States.

The issue over
Barack Obama�s eligibility does NOT pertain to
whether or not Barack is a �native born citizen,� but rather on the
well-known FACT that he is NOT a �natural-born citizen,� and that the US
Constitution clearly states that ONLY a �natural-born citizen� can be President
of the United States. To eliminate the confusion for Juan and others in his
camp, �native-born� is a matter of where someone is born geographically, and
�natural-born� is a matter of not only where one was born, but what his family
lineage is and where his foreign loyalties rest. There is NO debate over
the fact that Obama is the �natural-born� son of a
British citizen of Kenya. As such, Obama is
a �natural-born� British subject and citizen of his father�s nation, Kenya.
Even if he had navigated the naturalization process, becoming a �naturalized�
citizen, he would not qualify for the office of president. He claims to have
been born in Hawaii, using �anchor baby� laws to support the notion that he
qualifies. But even �anchor babies� are NOT �natural born citizens� for the
reasons stated in the Law of Nations, at the foundation of Article II�Section I
of our Constitution. They are �native-born,� thus the reason for Juan�s use of
this term. There is also NO honest debate over what the term �natural-born
citizen� used by the original �birthers,� our Founding Fathers, meant, and even
the US Senate was able to properly interpret the Law of Nations definition based
upon Natural Law, regarding Senator John McCain last year. But no!�Americans
furious that a foreign global leader is sitting in their White House shoving
anti-American policies down taxpayer throats for the benefit of leftist
political power around the world, looks like a simple case of �racism� to
Juan and Jimmy Carter. AMAZING!

In his New York Daily News column, Critics� attacks of President Obama are
scarier than bias, Juan advances the leftist assertion that only the color of
Obama�s skin is behind the growing dissent against a Resident-in-Chief run wild
with heavy handed policies aligned with Karl Marx, not Thomas Jefferson.

For the record, Juan is an uber-liberal black Democrat carrying water for the
uber-socialist agenda of his chosen political party, which is to say, he�s a
partisan pundit of the highest order. But unlike his �messiah� Barack Obama, he
makes no effort at disguising this fact, which wins him a couple points for
�transparency� from me.

Still, his effort at painting all citizen dissent against the current
administration as nothing more than �racism� is beyond disingenuous. It should
be criminal!

Even worse, it is grounded in a number of false assumptions perpetuated by his
party and if it is a race war they desire in America, they only need continue
their efforts to make all things a matter of race.

Joe Wilson
Welcome to the new Amerika! It has been proven once again that Barack Obama is
not above �lying� in pursuit of his puppet master�s leftist agenda. Barack Obama
was in fact �lying� to congress and the American people at the very moment when
South Carolina Representative Joe Wilson blurted out - �YOU LIE!�

Wilson was dead on! Obama does lie more often than he tells a truth, and he was
lying at the moment Wilson shouted out that reality! Sadly, Joe Wilson was the
ONLY individual in that joint session of congress who was telling the unfettered
truth that night, and the American people knew it. Joe Wilson�s campaign coffers
flooded with over a million dollars in donations from all across the country as
a result.

Since then, Wilson�s truth has been punished and Obama�s lie stands!

Juan�s Interpretation?
�Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) ratcheted up the racial heat when he shouted out �You
lie!� as the President spoke to Congress. No white President - that is to say
all who have come before - has ever had to put up with such contempt.�

Where was Juan when Democrats were calling Bush a �Nazi liar?� In fact, where
was Juan when his Speaker of the House was calling millions of average American
citizens �Nazis� just a week or so ago? Now Juan himself is calling millions of
Americans �liars� and �racists.�

Clearly, the divisions in America run deep at this moment in history, and the
heated rhetoric is �ratcheted up� by the continual efforts to silence all voices
of dissent, or label all dissenters �racists� no matter how unrelated to race or
valid their complaints might be.

Still, when listening to millions of citizens showing up at town hall meetings
and Tea Parties across the country, Juan only sees a bunch of racists. That�s
what he has been trained to see. That�s what all leftists have been trained to
see�

�These critics seem less interested in arguing about health care proposals than
in building the case that Obama is not legitimately our national leader. - They
charge Obama was not born in the United States, and therefore doesn�t meet the
requirements that all Presidents be native-born.��said Williams

No Juan� These people don�t want to debate the alleged benefits of �socialized
medicine� in a country where the Constitution grants the federal government NO
authority on such a matter, and where FREEDOM (not government) has created the
greatest nation on earth.

The issue over Barack Obama�s eligibility does NOT pertain to whether or not
Barack is a �native born citizen,� but rather on the well-known FACT that he is
NOT a �natural-born citizen,� and that the US Constitution clearly states that
ONLY a �natural-born citizen� can be President of the United States.

To eliminate the confusion for Juan and others in his camp, �native-born� is a
matter of where someone is born geographically, and �natural-born� is a matter
of not only where one was born, but what his family lineage is and where his
foreign loyalties rest.

There is NO debate over the fact that Obama is the �natural-born� son of a
British citizen of Kenya. As such, Obama is a �natural-born� British subject and
citizen of his father�s nation, Kenya. Even if he had navigated the
naturalization process, becoming a �naturalized� citizen, he would not qualify
for the office of president.

He claims to have been born in Hawaii, using �anchor baby� laws to support the
notion that he qualifies. But even �anchor babies� are NOT �natural born
citizens� for the reasons stated in the Law of Nations, at the foundation of
Article II�Section I of our Constitution. They are �native-born,� thus the
reason for Juan�s use of this term.

There is also NO honest debate over what the term �natural-born citizen� used by
the original �birthers,� our Founding Fathers, meant, and even the US Senate was
able to properly interpret the Law of Nations definition based upon Natural Law,
regarding Senator John McCain last year.

But no!�Americans furious that a foreign global leader is sitting in their White
House shoving anti-American policies down taxpayer throats for the benefit of
leftist political power around the world, looks like a simple case of �racism�
to Juan and Jimmy Carter. AMAZING!

�They make this argument even when all Hawaiian documents, officials and news
stories of his birth conclusively prove he is an American.� - Williams

I honestly expect better than this from Juan. THREE COLB�s (which anyone from
anywhere in the world can purchase in Hawaii) have been used as �proof� that
Obama is a �natural born citizen.� NO other evidence has been offered and Obama
has spent in excess of $1.5 million in legal fees to make certain that NO other
evidence is ever seen. Thanks to taxpayers, he has the most powerful legal
defense team in the world at his command in this effort, the Department of
Justice.

NOT GOOD ENOUGH!
�There are critics who claim he is Muslim, not a Christian, despite all
testimony about his years in the controversial church of the Rev. Jeremiah
Wright.� - Williams

Actually, the fact that Obama spent twenty years in Rev. Wright�s church has not
been ignored. It�s in fact, part of Obama�s problem.

Rev. Wright�s church is NOT a �Christian� church. It is a �Black Nationalist�
church that has done more to promote racism than the KKK ever did. It is the
reverse-KKK of the black community in Chicago, and one of very few �Christian�
churches in America that welcomes Muslims into the congregation without
demanding a religious conversion. In fact, Rev. Wright has far more in common
with Louis Farrakhan than with Jesus Christ.

�Then there are claims that Obama is a Socialist who is trying to subvert
America by ending the free-market economy. Some of this is explicitly racial, as
when the argument is made that Obama�s efforts at health care reform are really
a plot to get reparations for slavery for black Americans.��says Williams

Socialist is as socialist does Juan� and it has absolutely NOTHING whatsoever to
do with race.

Karl Marx, Joseph Stalin and Vladimir Lenin were ALL the same race as the side
of Obama�s family tree that he likes to avoid talking about. They were all
�white� men. Saddling Obama with the title of �socialist� is based on his
socialist beliefs and policies, not the mulatto color of his skin.

Juan and the alphabet networks looked toward DC this past weekend and saw 1000
to 50,000 �racists.� FOX saw only 75,000 angry citizens. But the DC police saw
1.3 million peaceful Americans and the National Park Service put the number well
over 2 million, all of it without a single arrest, burning cars overturned,
looting or broken store windows�. Some kind of �extremists� these folks are� and
dare I mention, there were some �black� folks in that group, lots of them.
According to Juan, �racists,� one and all!

Juan�s AgendaConsistent with the agenda of his party, Juan seeks to label ALL
dissent as an act of racism. There are two reasons for this�.

No American wants to be labeled a �racist� in 2009. Most of us thought we were
past all of that ancient rhetoric long before this election cycle. It�s an
attempt to silence ALL dissent.

Labeling all political policy dissent as an act of racism sets the nation back
decades in the effort to make race an issue of the past. This keeps the DNC in a
position of power over the black community, which is the end game for the DNC.

Juan has simply decided to perpetuate the deadly lies of his political party,
for benefit of their political power. It is destructive to the nation and will
eventually promote racial tensions until a race war erupts.

But the American people are growing weary of the label, �racism.�

Like the little boy that cried wolf so many times when no wolf was around, the
term �racism� is losing its meaning and impact.

The more they use this term, the less impact it has. The more they accuse
average American citizens of �racism� for opposing anti-American people on the
basis of their anti-American policies, the more angry and deaf to that term,
those American citizens become.

And the more the left tries to eliminate all open discussion and debate over
unwanted policies and uses racial attacks in that effort, the more they push the
nation towards racial violence and deeper division.

As a very average white American male born in the early �60s - I grew up
believing the message of Martin Luther King, as did most Americans of my
generation.

But the 2008 election cycle has changed that for me. I now see that the leaders
of today�s black community no longer believe in or represent the ideals of
Martin Luther King, for a color blind society.

Today�s black leaders and Democrat Party thrive on racial, ethnic, gender and
economic divisions. There is NO minority group they will not exploit for benefit
of their unquenchable thirst for political power, and there is NO American they
won�t label a degrading name if they challenge that agenda in any way.

This is the new �post-racial� America created by Barack Obama and his mindless
minions. It�s not my America, it�s their America.

As a result, he is NOT my president, and he wouldn�t be even if he was 100%
white and Hawaiian born.

He is anti-American, as are his policies and so are these attempts to label all
political dissent as nothing more than acts of racism. I pray for the day that
the black community wakes up and rises up against their real oppressors, the
American leftists who would have NO power at all without racial division today.

The Mistake, The Evidence, Obama is NOT a constitutional president

The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don�t Lie

Though we live in an era when all undesirable facts are often blindly labeled
�conspiracy theories� by political operatives with an agenda at risk, a very
real conspiracy unfolds every now and then.

While it is indeed true that not all theories are actual conspiracies, like
when Hillary Clinton developed an imaginary �right-wing conspiracy� out to get
her husband, when in fact, the semen stained dress provided all the necessary
(but unfriendly) facts and a perfectly logical explanation for all of those
nasty rumors � it is also true that some conspiracies are much more than just
crackpot theory.

To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire,
plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics
or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other
wrongful act, is a �conspiracy.� Not in theory, but in reality.

Such is the case today!

A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the
Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many �
many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system
and more than 300 million American citizens.

They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a
blind quest for unbridled political power, and they hoped that you would never
catch it. They almost got away with it too�

They snuck it past fifty state election commissions, congress, the US Supreme
Court and Justice Department, the Federal Elections Commission and countless
members of the Electoral College nationwide. Not a single member of the, as
Limbaugh says, �drive-by media� caught it either, or if they did, they decided
to become complicit for their own political reasons.

But as is always the case with liars, cheats and thieves, they slip up � make
a silly mistake � overplay their hand � leave evidence lying around that they
had forgotten about. And as with all chronic liars, they eventually get caught
in their own web of lies.

Then, one day, someone stumbles into that evidence, and the house of cards
comes crashing down around them. It�s almost poetic�

The
Mistake

Aware of the fact that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II �
Section I constitutional requirements for the office of President, what
well-seasoned professional politician would be stupid enough to sign their name
and stake their personal career upon certifying Obama as eligible?

Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates are nominated at their
respective Party Conventions.

Believe it or not, each Party is assigned the duty of vetting and certifying
the legal eligibility of their own candidates. I know, like asking the fox to
guard the henhouse, right. But hey, we are talking about a country which still
thinks there is a separation of powers between the High Court and the Executive
branch, which seats that court by way of political appointment, confirmed by
congress, which wants a piece of the judge and expects a few political favors
too.

The
Evidence

In this case, the Democrat Party was responsible for vetting and certifying
Barack Hussein Obama as legally eligible to seek the Oval Office. The U.S.
Constitution has only three very specific requirements for the job. The proper
legal text used on the DNC Party �Official Certification of Nomination� document
reads as follows, and I quote;

�THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of
the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28,
2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for
President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the
following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are
legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States
Constitution.�

Yes, I know�. there is a typo in there. Not my typo, it belongs to whoever
prepared the official document at the DNC. Did you catch it?

The document is signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the
House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Colorado Notary of
Public Shalifa A. Williamson. It is dated August 28, 2008.

However, this document was never delivered to a single state DNC Office for
state certification, and it was therefore, never presented to any state Election
Commission as certification of these candidates, although I do have a copy of
this notarized document myself.

Instead, a very similar document was delivered to fifty state DNC offices,
which those offices certified to each of fifty state Election Commissions, who
then date-stamped the document and stuck it in a file cabinet, and proceeded to
place these �certified� candidates on the ballot.

The �Official Certification of Nomination� that was presented by the DNC in
all fifty states for the 2008 Presidential election, in which Barack Hussein
Obama became the new President of the United States, was almost identical, and
it too was signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy
Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Notary of Public Shalifa A.
Williamson, dated August 28, 2008.

But this version of the document was missing the following text, and I quote;

�- and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the
United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United
States Constitution.�

The legal certification text on the DNC certified nomination document used
for the DNC ticket was limited to, and I quote;

�THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of
the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28,
2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for
President and Vice President of the United States respectively:

Oops, another typo? The reference to Obama�s constitutional eligibility was
missing� An accidental omission?

The text certifying that Barack Hussein Obama was �legally qualified to
serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution� had been
removed from the document sent to the states. And yes, I have a copy of this
version of the DNC Official Certification of Nomination letter too!

In fact, this version is in Election Commission files of all fifty state
Election Commission offices, state DNC headquarters, complete with date stamps,
matching signatures, even the same Notary of Public authentication, and absent
the constitutional text.

Just in case you are wondering, the answer is yes. This version also includes
the same typo present in the version not submitted by the DNC, but including the
constitutional text, which means both documents have the same place of origin.

The individual at DNC headquarters who prepared this very important document
was not only a poor typist� they were sloppy enough to leave both versions of
the signed documents lying around.

Now this is the stuff real conspiracies are made of!

The
Implications

Please, allow me to connect the dots here�

The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different
versions of their Official Certification of Nomination
documents, not one.

One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of
them was missing the text concerning the constitutional
eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.

The version which is absent any certification of constitutional
standing for the office of President is the version that was
filed with every state in the country, and the one used by the
DNC to elect Barack Obama President.

Oh, there is one more important document in this story.

The RNC �Official Certification of Nomination� for John McCain and Sarah
Palin reads, and I quote:

�We do hereby certify that a national convention of Delegates representing
the Republican Party of the United States, duly held and convened in the city of
Saint Paul, State of Minnesota, on September 4, 2008, the following person,
meeting the constitutional requirements for the Office of President of the
United States, and the following person, meeting the constitutional requirements
for the Office of Vice President of the Unites States, were nominated for such
offices to be filled at the ensuing general election, November 4, 2008, viz;�

The certification of constitutional eligibility is there in the RNC
Certification of Nomination presented to the state Election Commissions. It�s
there in the document which the DNC had prepared, signed and notarized, but did
NOT deliver to the states.

But it is NOT there in the DNC Certification of Nomination that the DNC used
to certify and elect Barack Hussein Obama President and Joseph Biden Vice
President of the United States of America.

Last, the fact that TWO DNC Certifications exist, both signed, dated and
notarized by the same individuals on the same day, means that a very real
conspiracy to commit election fraud was underway, and since it took until six
months after the election to uncover it, the conspiracy was indeed successful.

Are you still wondering why Barack Obama has spent nearly $1.5 million in
taxpayer�s funds to race Department of Justice lawyers around the country to
stop all cases questioning Obama�s eligibility before discovery can force Obama
to open up his top secret life?

Now I realize that leftists, I mean liberals, no �progressives� � don�t like
getting all bogged down in minutia and nit-picky details like the Constitution,
but this is actually very serious business here. We are talking about the
top-down leadership of the ruling political Party knowingly and wantonly
defrauding voters by way of playing monkey business with fraudulent election
documents.

As Al Gore once said, the debate is OVER!

There is no honest debate on the matter anymore. Obama is NOT a
constitutional president, which is to say, we do NOT have a constitutional
federal administration at present and every anti-American policy of the last six
months is also, BINGO! � Unconstitutional!

What is still in question however � does any court in America have the
backbone to do what must be done? � And what do the American people do, if not
one court in the nation has that kind of constitutional backbone today?

Obama�s DOJ has thus far been successful in blocking the people�s access to
the courts by claiming that no American citizen, including another presidential
candidate, has �proper standing� to demand proof of Obama�s constitutional
eligibility for the office he fraudulently holds.

To be very clear, the RNC nomination form filed with the states certifies
that John McCain met all constitutional requirements for the Office of
President. But the DNC nomination form filed with the states is absent any such
language.

I know what I conclude from these facts, but what do you conclude from these
facts?

More importantly, what will a court of law conclude? Will they ever even
agree to hear the evidence?

JB Williams is a business man, a husband, a father, and a
writer. A no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and
American philosophy. He is published nationwide and in many countries around the
world. JB Williams� website is
jb-williams.com/

The two conditions necessary
for NATURAL BORN CITIZENSHIP are: (1) CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH and (2) BIRTH TO
CITIZEN PARENTS.

There have been claims that Obama's step-grandmother, Sarah Onyango Obama
(Obama�s paternal grandfather�s second wife, born in 1922), told reporters that
Barack Obama, Jr. was born in Kenya when her stepson came to visit�accompanied
by a pregnant Ann Dunham. Sarah Obama further states that she was present in the
Mombasa delivery room when Obama was born. One half-brother and one half-sister
of Obama also claim he was born in Kenya. That would be consistent with a
purported stop by Dunham to the state of Washington on the return trip to
Hawaii, and with the possible existence of only a Hawaiian register of birth,
rather than an actual Hawaiian birth certificate. The Chicago Tribune was told
by Dunham�s friend Susan Blake that Dunham visited her in Seattle with the
newborn infant shortly after his birth. That visit to Blake makes more sense as
part of a necessary return trip from Kenya to Hawaii through Seattle than as an
optional pleasure trip from Hawaii to Seattle and back to Hawaii simply to show
off a newborn baby.

Obama's American citizen parent, Ann Dunham, had to have been a resident of the
United States for 10 years, at least five of which were over the age of 14.
Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised
June 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months
after Obama was born. The law confers U.S. nationality on a child born outside
the United States only under certain circumstances, including: "(7) a person
born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying
possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the
United States, who prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in
the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling
not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of
fourteen years." http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=4107.0

Obama is not a natural-born citizen regardless of where he was born.

8 beers - $32
2 plane tickets - $1000
1 Day of a Harvard Professor's time - $500
1 Day of the Vice Presidents time - $850
1 Day of the President's time - $1,000

Watching 3 crooks apologize to an "honest cop" - PRICELESS!

The objective of the following critique is
not to demean blacks, but simply to question the validity of what appears to be
a presidential-sized LIE!

The "IQ test" at
http://iqtest.com is not really a valid IQ test. While tests like GRE
and SAT and TIMSS were not designed specifically to test IQ, and they do have
their limitations in doing that, they are much more comprehensive and credible
than iqtest.com. Being only 32 true or false questions, just randomly guessing
at iqtest.com will produce an "IQ" of 102, so anyone who scores lower than an
"IQ" of 102 actually exhibits negative IQ.

And that's indicative of the problem with the standardized tests mentioned
above. The SAT consists of one essay question which can be scored only by
subjective means, opening it up to controversy about whether or not it's valid
or accurate. The most objective part of the test are the 225 five part multiple
choice questions which attempt to measure the probability of a student
succeeding in college or graduate school. About 1/4th of these questions can be
answered strictly from rote memorization. For simplicity we include the results
of the essay question in this part of the test. The other 3/4ths require some
form of reasoning or calculation which can be measured objectively.

The base score of 200 is assigned when a student signs their name. Of the 600
points between 200 and 800, another 150 points can be gained by knowing the
subjects but not exhibiting any reasoning or critical thinking skills, for a
total score thus far of 350. If a person were to just guess on the balance of
the five part multiple choice questions, he would on average get 20% of them
correct just by chance, for another 90 points and a total score of 440.

This score of 440 is conservative. In TIMSS physics, which is scored similarly
and which has questions of equal validity and depth, the score of 474 for
American girls represents a score for students who would have performed better
if they'd just guessed on this part of the test.

So a score of 440, and possibly a score as high as 474, is not indicative of any
reasoning or critical thinking skills at all. These skills are measured only
between 440-474 and 800, with many Asian students (more than 10% of them)
scoring higher than 800. This makes SAT a bad IQ test, particularly when
American blacks consistently score lower than this, or 431 in both SAT Verbal
and SAT Math, 391 in GRE Verbal, and 416 in GRE Quantitative.

While the College Board provides the standard deviation for black students in
both SAT and GRE, scores this low cannot be expected to follow a normal Gaussian
Distribution. For the average to be 431, there can't be too many students who
score higher than this, because it's almost impossible to score lower than this,
so their estimate that the standard deviation, say for black women who took GRE
Verbal, is 88, is the most optimistic estimate.

iow, these standardized tests all prove that it's scientifically, statistically,
mathematically, and positively impossible for Obama to have an "IQ" of 127 as he
advertised--and this truly is the ultimate definition of false advertising.

Critique of a Critique of the Lack of References to Obama's Affirmative
Action Status

[T]hese are the facts concerning Obama's LSAT score while attending Law School
at Harvard University. We do not know his actual LSAT score; however, after much
research, we found that the average LSAT score for all Harvard students is 171.
The percentile rank for an LSAT score of 171 at Harvard is 98.8 %.

MENSA will accept LSAT scores as a means of qualifying for MENSA membership.
(MENSA also accepts up to 200 various IQ tests and other tests of cognitive
function as well.) The LSAT score required for MENSA membership is equal to a
percentile of 95% or higher. Thus, basing Obama's estimated LSAT score of 171
ranks him in the top 98.8% (percent/percentile) range which is clearly above the
lowest acceptable LSAT percentage rank of 95%, which clearly affirms that Obama
has a qualifying intelligence quotient that would allow him acceptance into
MENSA.

Since MENSA accepts various IQ Tests as well as other cognitive tests to qualify
for MENSA membership it is safe to estimate that Obama's IQ Score could range
anywhere from a low IQ score of 130 based on the Stanford Binet IQ Test,
Revision 5, to a high IQ score of 148 based on the Cattell IQ Test.

What the IQ guy failed to account for is the fact that Harvard University
practices affirmative action.
PBS Frontline reports: "The
gap in SAT scores persists even at the highest levels of achievement. A study of
the 1989 applicants to five highly-selective universities found that white
candidates' average combined SAT score was 186 points higher than the
corresponding SAT average for African American applicants."

Furthermore,
the New York Times reports
that "At
the best schools, by contrast, efforts to diversify the student body translate
into a 400-point bonus for minority students on the SAT tests."

That 98.8 ranking based on the average Harvard
LSAT translates to about a 135 IQ and a combined SAT score of 1290. That's
pretty good, if not spectacular. However, due to affirmative action, one must
reduce that score by at least 186 points. (Also, I suspect the NYT article is
talking about the new SAT, which isn't valid for the purposes of this
comparison.) Thus, giving Obama the benefit of the doubt drops his score to
1104, which is approximately equivalent to an IQ of 116. That's not bad, but it
is significantly less intelligent than Hillary's 140 IQ, as well as being lower
than George W. Bush's 125 IQ (1206 SAT).

Before one points to the fact that Obama ranked highly in his class, it's
important to keep in mind that Bill Bradley was a Princeton Rhodes Scholar
despite his 485 Verbal SAT and mediocre 103 IQ. Academic success, like every
other kind of success, is just as much about hard work and determination as it
is about intellectual firepower, but Barack Obama's supporters obviously
shouldn't be attempting to make their case for him on the basis of what is,
based on the available information, probably an IQ of 116, only one standard
deviation above the norm. Of course, this estimate is based on averages which
don't necessarily apply to a single individual; Obama could lay the matter to
rest by simply permitting his scores to be released to the public.

If his intelligence is so incredibly important,
as some of his more visibly insane
supporters insist, then surely the senator should inform us precisely
how intelligent he is. Because
he demonstrates his ignorance
and a less-than-impressive intelligence nearly every time
he opens his mouth despite
his handlers attempts to retroactively fix his statements: "The
fact that we have reached a point where the Federal Reserve felt it had to take
this unprecedented step with the American Insurance Group is the final verdict
on the failed economic philosophy of the last eight years."

First, AIG didn't fail because of the economic philosophy of the last eight
years. The Fed began goosing the markets under Clinton. Second, that
"unprecedented step" was taken with the American International Group.

THE CRITIQUE

Similar to University of California admissions where all of the
following 375 students were Blacks

At UC Berkeley, where it's called "comprehensive review," the
system is under attack. A study last month commissioned by UC Board of Regents
Chairman John Moores and reported by the Los Angeles Times found that in 2002
Berkeley admitted
375 students with SAT scores between 600 and 1000, and rejected about 3,200
students with SAT scores above 1400.

The same thing happened at Harvard the year Obama was
admitted, when the average
SAT Math score for AMERICAN black boys and girls was 431 and 416,
respectively, and whose SAT verbal scores were 431 and 437, respectively, for a
total of 862 and 853. The SAT math score of 416 for the AVERAGE college
bound AMERICAN black girl is equivalent to an IQ of
75 IQ points, and the
lowest scoring students who were ADMITTED with total SAT scores of 600 and SAT
math scores of 300 are equivalent to IQs of less than 60 IQ points. Who
other than AFRICAN blacks would have been admitted to a school like Harvard when
they demonstrated such low academic skills--and why would our educators be so
anxious to admit them while rejecting so many students with scores above 1400?
They rejected more than 8 times as many higher scoring students than the lower
scoring students they admitted.

Major Correction July 27, 2011

This entire section has been updated and is posted here
in its entirety

The simple facts

In 2003, three African nations, Botswana, South Africa, and
Ghana, participated in
TIMSS physics.The average score for the 5,150 students in Botswana who took the test
was 366, of whom 7 scored higher than three standard deviations higher than
their mean or 581, and none of whom scored 604, the AVERAGE for Singapore.
This makes the liberal presumption that IQ's in Africa follow the typical
Gaussian Distribution that our IQ's follow, which is the most optimistic
assumption we can make about Black African intellect. It also ignores that
many of the test takers in all three of these African nations are WHITES whose
brethren back in Europe (e.g., the Dutch in South Africa) have some of the
highest test scores in the world. The average score for the 8,952
students in South Africa who took the test was 263, twelve of whom scored higher
than three standard deviations higher than their mean or 585, and none of whom
scored over 604.So also in Ghana,
where the average score for their 5,100 students was 275, seven of whom scored
higher than three standard deviations higher than their mean or 549, and none of
whom scored over 589, the AVERAGE for Korea, whose
IQ Professor Lynn estimates
to be an average of 106.

Since the average score for the 6,018 students in Singapore
was 604 and their standard deviation was 80, only eight of their students scored
lower than 364 [the AVERAGE for Botswana], and none of whom scored lower than
284 [the AVERAGE for Ghana].At
best we can say that eight students in Singapore MAY have scored lower than
SEVERAL of the thirteen highest scoring students in South Africa and SEVERAL of
the seven highest scoring students in Ghana.
We can also safely assume that 8 students in Singapore would have scored
three standard deviations higher than their mean or 844 had the test allowed
them to score higher than 800.

So out of 19,202 African students, less than 19 or 0.1% of
them scored higher than 581, and NONE of them scored as high as the AVERAGE of
604 for Singapore whose average IQ Professor Lynn estimates to be 100.

It simply boggles the imagination for us to be expected to
believe that Obama was the ONE Kenyan in the entire world who scored not just
one but TWO standard deviations higher than a place where NO Ghanan, Botswanan,
nor South African ever ventured.To
claim that his IQ is 132 IQ points, yet another standard deviation higher than
the impossible, is the height of absurdity.It would make Obama more valuable as a Wringly Brothers� Circus freak
than a six legged elephant.Yet
that�s exactly the claim that his presidential campaign made, and you should be
embarrassed to the hilt to see so many of your fellow countrymen fall for this
vicious circus act.

TIMSS Math

1 SD

2 SD

3 SD

4 SD

5 SD

South Africa Scores

264

371

478

585

692

799

# of students

8,952

1,421

203

12

0

0

Ghana Scores

276

367

458

549

640

731

# of students

5,100

809

116

7

0

0

Botswana Scores

366

438

510

581

653

725

# of students

5,150

814

117

7

0

0

Singapore Scores

604

684

764

844

924

1004

# of students

6,018

955

136

8

0

0

Average IQ of Kenya is Only 71

The average IQ of Kenya is 71 IQ points, the same as for
Ghana, and 1 point lower than both Botswana's and South Africa's of 72 IQ
points. So even though Kenya did not
participate in TIMSS, there's no reason to expect that they would have performed
any better than South Africa or Ghana, and plenty of evidence that they would
have scored even lower. The most liberal estimate for the intellectual
skills of Black Kenyans would be that they follow the same Gaussian Distribution
as that of White Americans, AND that the standard deviations reported by TIMSS
are representative of that for all Blacks, NEITHER of which is the case.
We should note that the standard deviations for non-multicultural societies like
Sweden, Slovenia, Netherlands, Estonia, Morocco, and Lebanon are close to 70 (or
lower), whereas those for multicultural societies like Taipei, Ghana, Indonesia,
Palestine, Romania, and South Africa are closer to 90 (or higher).

No Quadroon Geniuses in South Africa

If there's any place on Earth where we'd expect mixed
breeds ("Coloreds", "Quadroons", "Mulatos", "Mestizos", or whatever other name
you'd like to apply to the offspring of Whites who marry Blacks) to illustrate
an IQ higher than that of their lowest IQ parent, it's not Kenya, it's
South Africa
where 15% of the population are "coloreds" and the majority of the 4.3 million
Whites (9.1% of the population) are from the Netherlands who have consistently
scored higher than us on all the international tests. In 8th grade
TIMSS, the Netherlands
scored 35 points higher than us, but by the 12th grade they scored 560 or 99
points higher, and in PISA
they scored 531 (almost as high as South Korea) which was 57 points higher than
us.

South Africa's score of 264 and standard deviation of 107
is a composite of three different races, each of which undoubtedly had a
standard deviation of 70 or less. The 9.1%
who are Whites most likely scored in the range of their brethren in the
Netherlands, or 536 who had a standard deviation of 69. At BEST, the 15%
who are Coloreds scored an average of their Black and White ancestors, and
Blacks there managed to score low enough to reduce South Africa's score to the
lowest of any of these international tests:

(9.1% x 536) + 15% x (536 + X)/2 + (75.9% x X) = 264

48.776 + (80.4 + .15X)/2 + .759X = 264

97.552 + 80.4 + .15X + 1.518X = 528

1.668X = 350.048

X = 210

(536 + 210) / 2 = 373

TIMSS Math

1 SD

2 SD

3 SD

4 SD

5 SD

South Africa Whites

536

605

674

743

812

881

South Africa Coloreds

373

443

513

583

653

723

South Africa Blacks

210

280

350

420

490

560

NO African Black Has an IQ Higher Than 105!

Less than 0.00003% of any population scores higher than
five standard deviations higher than their mean, which for Blacks in South
Africa is a score of 560. IF all 800 million Blacks on the entire
Continent of Africa follow the typical Gaussian Distribution, the MOST
optimistic assessment of their academic performance, then less than 240 of them
scored as high as 560, ten points lower than the 570 average for Japan who Professor Lynn estimates
have an average IQ of 105. This would
mean that the 240 most intelligent out of 800 million African Blacks have an
IQ lower than 105, and NONE of them have an IQ higher than that. Out of 38
million Kenyans, less than 12 would be expected to score higher than 5 standard
deviations higher than their mean, which would have been an even lower TIMSS
Math score than 560 had Kenya taken this test (iow, much lower than an IQ of
105)!

Obama�s not even a pure Kenyan.He�s a mixed breed and most mixed breeds of most species are of lower
quality and intelligence than the pure breeds (otherwise why don�t mules race in
horse races)? Believing that Obama has an IQ of 127 is
worse than believing that
a mule will finally win the Preakness!

By what process did Obama achieve something that NO African
of either race has ever achieved, an IQ between 127 and 132 IQ points as his ads
claimed? Where could his White mother possibly have come from to produce
such an offspring? Even worse, if she's a Russian jew or an Israeli as the
rumors indicate, then she's from a race which scores even lower than Whites, and
much lower than Whites from the Netherlands. Israel (where the vast
majority of the population of her race are) scored only 442 in
PISA Math, a whopping 107
points lower than Hong Kong and only 36 points higher than Mexico whose average
IQ is only 87. Even IF we would expect Obama's IQ to be an average of the
IQ's of his Black father and jewish mother, the very BEST we could expect using
this logic is that his IQ is only 82, not 127 nor 133.

Affirmative Action is CHEATING!@

California voters consider affirmative action to be
CHEATING, which is why we outlawed it with Proposition 209 which actually
amended the state constitution for the express purpose of KILLING it.Obama is clearly left over from those days of invidious systemic racist
discrimination and doesn't deserve the time of day from this putative Christian
nation, much less any right to rule it.

Why not simply require him to take the normal IQ test which
any dog catcher in your county has to take in order to qualify for his job?

You can bet that this would settle the matter once and for
all.

Correction

7% of the population of Botswana are Whites who score
similar to their brethren back in England at 545, meaning that the 93% who�re
blacks scored 358.Only seven black
students from Botswana scored over 456 and none of them scored over 514.Therefore, none of the lowest scoring eight students in Singapore who
scored lower than 462 are likely to have scored lower than the seven top scoring
black students from Botswana, meaning there was no overlap of test scores
between Singapore and Botswana.

THAT is even further proof that Obama LIED when he said
his IQ was 132.Many things he said
of questionable veracity might be considered just matters of opinion, but THIS
is a PROVABLE lie.Even if all of
his other questionable claims are 100% true, that does not absolve him of this
KNOWN LIE.Why LIE about this when
it�s so easy to PROVE to be a lie?
He was too busy lying to stop and figure out when to stop lying?He got away with so many other lies that what could possibly be wrong
with one more white lie?He thought
the American public was so badly dumbed down that we�d never catch him in yet
one more lie?He did it just to
thumb his huge Negroid nose at us honkies?

Update

We should add that for anyone in Ghana to score 676, an IQ
of about 110 IQ points, he would have to score seven standard deviations (7
S.D.) higher than the average score for Ghana of 239, which is a mathematical
impossibility.This is a range
where only 137 students from Singapore and 12 students from the US scored.

Many specious statements Obama made might be considered by
some to be just "matters of opinion". But this is a CERTIFIABLE LIE, and
can easily be proven to be.

No Black Geniuses on Graduate Record Exam for Four Decades

Blacks are the only race where women scored higher than men in
GRE, yet the highest scoring
25 black women scored only 654 in GRE Verbal in 1997, hardly genius category.
And most if not all of these 25 women were most likely Whites pretending to be
Blacks in order to benefit from affirmative action.

The simple facts

In 2003, three African nations, Botswana, South Africa, and
Ghana, participated in
TIMSS physics.The average score for the 5,150 students in Botswana who took the test
was 366, of whom 7 scored higher than three standard deviations higher than
their mean or 582, and none of whom scored 604, the AVERAGE for Singapore.
This makes the liberal presumption that IQ's in Africa follow the typical
Gaussian Distribution that our IQ's follow, which is the most optimistic
assumption we can make about Black African intellect. It also ignores that
many of the test takers in all three of these African nations are WHITES whose
brethren back in Europe (e.g., the Dutch in South Africa) have some of the
highest test scores in the world. The average score for the 8,952
students in South Africa who took the test was 263, twelve of whom scored higher
than three standard deviations higher than their mean or 585, and none of whom
scored over 604.So also in Ghana,
where the average score for their 5,100 students was 275, seven of whom scored
higher than three standard deviations higher than their mean or
547, and none of
whom scored over 589, the AVERAGE for Korea, whose
IQ Professor Lynn estimates
to be an average of 106.

Since the average score for the 6,018 students in Singapore
was 604 and their standard deviation was 80, only eight of their students scored
lower than 444 [78 points
higher than the AVERAGE for Botswana], and none of whom scored lower than
284 [the AVERAGE for Ghana].[deleted]

So out of 19,202 African students, less than 19 or 0.1% of
them scored higher than 582, and NONE of them scored as high as the AVERAGE of
604 for Singapore whose average IQ Professor Lynn estimates to be 100.

It simply boggles the imagination for us to be expected to
believe that Obama was the ONE Kenyan in the entire world who scored not just
one but TWO standard deviations higher than a place where NO Ghanan, Botswanan,
nor South African ever ventured.To
claim that his IQ is 132 IQ points, yet another standard deviation higher than
the impossible, is the height of absurdity.It would make Obama more valuable as a Wringly Brothers� Circus freak
than a six legged elephant.Yet
that�s exactly the claim that his presidential campaign made, and you should be
embarrassed to the hilt to see so many of your fellow countrymen fall for this
vicious circus act.

TIMSS Math

1 SD

2 SD

3 SD

4 SD

5 SD

South Africa Scores

264

317

371

424

477

530

# of students

8,952

1,421

203

12

0

0

Ghana Scores

276

367

412

457

502

547

# of students

5,100

809

116

7

0

0

Botswana Scores

366

438

474

510

546

582

# of students

5,150

814

117

7

0

0

Singapore Scores

604

684

688

728

768

808

# of students

6,018

955

136

8

0

0

Average IQ of Kenya is Only 71

The average IQ of Kenya is 71 IQ points, the same as for
Ghana, and 1 point lower than both Botswana's and South Africa's of 72 IQ
points. So even though Kenya did not
participate in TIMSS, there's no reason to expect that they would have performed
any better than South Africa or Ghana, and plenty of evidence that they would
have scored even lower. The most liberal estimate for the intellectual
skills of Black Kenyans would be that they follow the same Gaussian Distribution
as that of White Americans, AND that the standard deviations reported by TIMSS
are representative of that for all Blacks, NEITHER of which would be expected to
be the case.
We should note that the standard deviations for non-multicultural societies like
Sweden, Slovenia, Netherlands, Estonia, Morocco, and Lebanon are close to 70 (or
lower), whereas those for multicultural societies like Taipei, Ghana, Indonesia,
Palestine, Romania, and South Africa are closer to 90 (or higher).

No Quadroon Geniuses in South Africa

If there's any place on Earth where we'd expect mixed
breeds ("Coloreds", "Quadroons", "Mulatos", "Mestizos",
"Mamzers", or whatever other name
you'd like to apply to the offspring of Whites who marry Blacks) to illustrate
an IQ higher than that of their lowest IQ parent, it's not Kenya, it's
South Africa
where 15% of the population are "coloreds" and the majority of the 4.3 million
Whites (9.1% of the population) are from the Netherlands who have consistently
scored higher than us on all the international tests. In 8th grade
TIMSS, the Netherlands
scored 35 points higher than us, but by the 12th grade they scored 560 or 99
points higher, and in PISA
they scored 531 (almost as high as South Korea) which was 57 points higher than
us.

South Africa's score of 264 and standard deviation of 107
is a composite of three different races, each of which undoubtedly had a
standard deviation of 70 or less. The 9.1%
who are Whites most likely scored in the range of their brethren in the
Netherlands, or 536 who had a standard deviation of 69. At BEST, the 15%
who are Coloreds scored an average of their Black and White ancestors, and
Blacks there managed to score low enough to reduce South Africa's score to the
lowest of any of these international tests:

(9.1% x 536) + 15% x (536 + X)/2 + (75.9% x X) = 264

48.776 + (80.4 + .15X)/2 + .759X = 264

97.552 + 80.4 + .15X + 1.518X = 528

1.668X = 350.048

X = 210

(536 + 210) / 2 = 373

TIMSS Math

1 SD

2 SD

3 SD

4 SD

5 SD

South Africa Whites

536

571

605

640

674

708

South Africa Coloreds

373

408

443

478

513

548

South Africa Blacks

210

245

280

315

350

385

NO African Black Has an IQ Higher Than 88

Less than 0.00003% of any population scores higher than
five standard deviations higher than their mean, which for Blacks in South
Africa is a score of 385. IF all 800 million Blacks on the entire
Continent of Africa follow the typical Gaussian Distribution, the MOST
optimistic assessment of their academic performance, then less than 240 of them
scored as high as 385, 185 points (and 5 standard
deviations) lower than the 570 average for Japan who Professor Lynn estimates
have an average IQ of 105. This would
mean that the 240 most intelligent out of 800 million African Blacks have an
IQ lower than 88, and NONE of them have an IQ higher than that. Out of 38
million Kenyans, less than 12 would be expected to score higher than 5 standard
deviations higher than their mean, which would have been an even lower TIMSS
Math score than 560 had Kenya taken this test (iow, much lower than an IQ of
105)!

Obama's not even a pure Kenyan.He's a mixed breed and most mixed breeds of most species are of lower
quality and intelligence than the pure breeds (otherwise why don't mules race in
horse races)? Believing that Obama has an IQ of 127 is
worse than believing that
a mule will finally win the Preakness!

By what process did Obama achieve something that NO African
of either race has ever achieved, an IQ between 127 and 132 IQ points
as his political ads
proclaimed? Where could his White mother possibly have come from to produce
such an offspring? Even worse, if she's a Russian jew or an Israeli as the
rumors indicate, then she's from a race which scores even lower than Whites, and
much lower than Whites from the Netherlands. Israel (where the vast
majority of the population of her race are) scored only 442 in
PISA Math, a whopping 107
points lower than Hong Kong and only 36 points higher than Mexico whose average
IQ is only 87. Even IF we would expect Obama's IQ to be an average of the
IQ's of his Black father and jewish mother, the very BEST we could expect using
this logic is that his IQ is only 82, not even 88, and
certainly not 127 or 133.

Correction

7% of the population of Botswana are Whites who score
similar to their brethren back in England at 545, meaning that the 93% who�re
blacks scored 358.Only seven black
students from Botswana scored over 456 and none of them scored over 514.Therefore, none of the lowest scoring eight students in Singapore who
scored lower than 462 are likely to have scored lower than the seven top scoring
black students from Botswana, meaning there was no overlap of test scores
between Singapore and Botswana.

THAT is even further proof that Obama LIED when he said
his IQ was 132.Many things he said
of questionable veracity might be considered just matters of opinion, but THIS
is a PROVABLE lie.Even if all of
his other questionable claims are 100% true, that does not absolve him of this
KNOWN LIE.Why LIE about this when
it�s so easy to PROVE to be a lie?
He was too busy lying to stop and figure out when to stop lying?He got away with so many other lies that what could possibly be wrong
with one more white lie?He thought
the American public was so badly dumbed down that we�d never catch him in yet
one more lie?He did it just to
thumb his huge Negroid nose at us honkies?

Update

We should add that for anyone in Ghana to score 676, an IQ
of about 110 IQ points, he would have to score ten standard deviations (10
S.D.) higher than the average score for Ghana of 239, which is a mathematical
impossibility.This is a range
where only 137 students from Singapore and 12 students from the US scored,
thus Obama's claim of an IQ of 132 is a mathematical absurdity!

What follows are the undisputed facts concerning the eligibility of Barack
Hussein Obama to the office of president. Any U.S. Senator or U.S.
Representative is welcome to dispute these yet undisputed facts. In so doing,
however, the American people
demand that the evidence be produced:

1 -
Barack Hussein Obama has not been vetted or certified eligible to the office of
president of the United
States by any agency tasked to do so or authorized to do so.

2 -
Not one American citizen, not one Senator, not one Representative has seen,
touched or examined Barack Hussein Obama�s vault copy Hawaii
birth certificate.
On October 31, 2008, Dr Chiyome Fukino, Department of Health, Hawaii,
issued a press release in which she stated that she had �seen and verified�
that a Hawaii birth certificate for Obama did exist; she did not state what was
on it nor did she state that it showed that Obama was born in Hawaii.

3 -
The Certification
of Live Birth
(COLB) that Obama has been waving about is not a �birth certificate� as he
claims, as the mainstream media claims, as
FactCheck.orgFighttheSmears.com
claims. The COLB is a short form, computer printed document deriving the
information printed thereon from a database of information
supposedly (See #13 and #14 below) taken from the original long form
vault copy Hawaiian birth certificate.

4 -Factcheck.org claims to be a
non-partisan organization. Factcheck.org is funded by the
Annenberg
Foundation on whose board Obama sat. Factcheck.org is about as non-partisan
as is Obama. The Annenberg Foundation has never passed up a chance to fund a
�progressive� (a.k.a., Marxist) cause.

5 -
Hawaii has a law,
HRS 338-17.8, which allows for the birth registration of a child born in a
foreign country so long as one parent is a U.S. citizen and so long as that
parent claimed Hawaii as his or her permanent residence for one year prior
to the birth. Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama met both of these requirements.

6 -
If Obama was born in Hawaii, he is, at best, a dual citizen. At his birth, his
father was a British
subject as
Kenya was a
British colony. Dual citizenship precludes Obama from
eligibility under Article II, Section 1, United States Constitution. Prior
cases decided by the United States Supreme Court, involving the determination of
�natural born� have used Vattel�s �The
Law of Nations� definition which states, �The natives, or natural-born
citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.� (Part
I, Chapter 19, Section 212). Factcheck.org states that Obama was a
dual citizen at birth.

7 -
If Obama was born in Kenya, he was, at birth, a British subject as Kenya was a
British colony. American law, at that time, required that Stanley Ann (Dunham)
Obama be a
minimum of 19 years of age at his birth to confer to him her American
citizenship if he was born outside the United States; she was only 18 years old
when Obama was born.

8 -Barack Hussein Obama�s
paternal step-grandmother has stated before witnesses, said witnesses signing
affidavits, that she was witness to the birth of Obama in Kenya. See
here,
here, and
here.

10 -
When Barack Hussein Obama was registered at the
Fransiskus Assissi Primary School in Jakarta, Indonesia, his father was
listed as Lolo Seotoro; his citizenship as Indonesian; his name as
Barry Soetoro.

11 -
When Stanley Ann (Dunham) Soetoro divorced Lolo Soetoro in 1980, the
divorce papers show they had two children: one minor child (Maya), one over
18 (Barack).

12 -
When Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, became an Indonesian citizen, his
British citizenship would have been terminated; if he was born in Hawaii, also
his American dual citizenship. Indonesia does not allow for dual
citizenship.

13 -
Returning to the
COLB. This document, as waved about by Obama, may be authentic on its face
(See #14), but it is not accurate. Were it accurate, it would show Lolo Soetoro
as his father; his name as Barry Soetoro.

14 -
The
COLB Obama waves about lists the race of his biological father as �African.�
African is not a race any more than American is. This brings into question the
authenticity of the COLB Obama is waving about as his �birth certificate.�

15 -
If Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, did become an American citizen, he
became a naturalized American citizen which precludes him from eligibility under
Article 2, Section 1, United States Constitution. There has been no proof
presented that he is even a naturalized American citizen.

16 -
Barack Hussein Obama has multiple aliases: Barry Soetoro, Barry Dunham, Barry
Obama, Barack Soetoro, Barack Dunham. When he registered with the
American Bar Association,
he listed none of these as is required by law. Unless he had his name legally
changed to Barack Hussein Obama after his adoption, of which there has been no
proof presented, Barry Soetoro is his real name and Barack Hussein Obama is an
alias.

17 -
All his passport records, education records, medical records,
birth records
have become �not available� to the public. Those records show where he was born,
if he applied for or received aid as a foreign student, the country or countries
from which he has received passports.

18 -
His
selective service registration appears to be fraudulent. If he was a
naturalized American citizen when he turned 18, and he
failed to register with the selective service, he is barred from holding any
position in government, elected or otherwise.

19 -
If he is not even a
naturalized citizen, he is barred from holding any elected office.

20 -
If he is not even a naturalized citizen, he is an illegal alien.

Nowhere to Run

Obama has been running from his entire past for years now. His birth, college
and passport records remain under lock and key. As the filibuster-proof Democrat
congress works to force all U.S. national security secrets out into the public
venue, they continue to provide cover for their messiah and run interference for
the unconstitutional resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. But sooner or later,
they will run out of room to run and places to hide. Their efforts to deflect
public attention by attacking the U.S. intelligence community could be the final
fuse that ignites a political implosion of cataclysmic proportions.

Savior or Saboteur? Obama in
a Realistic Light

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

�It is a great pity when the one who should be the head figure is a mere figure
head.�
-- Charles H. Spurgeon

Barack Obama is less of a person than an image� a brand. People see whatever
they want as they do on a Rorschach test. Butdoes anyone really know him?

In
fact, he is:
An empty suit.
A man with no birth certificate.
A man who was deserted in childhood by his biological father.
A man whose birth records, both in the United States and Kenya, are sealed by
government order.
A man whose childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, spied on U.S. military
installations in Hawaii for the Soviet Union, edited a communist newspaper,
authored pornographic novels, and wrote poetry in praise of Joseph Stalin.
A man mentored by and still supported by radical Muslims.
A man who promised transparency in government, but has spent over a million
dollars in legal fees hiding information that would determine his eligibility to
be President.
A former drug user.
A man whose academic records are sealed from kindergarten through law school.
A man who arrived in New York in June of 1981 without enough money to get a
hotel room, but one month later flew to Indonesia and Pakistan.
Why did he go?
Who paid his expenses?
A man who traveled to Pakistan when it was illegal for U.S. citizens to do so.
So what country�s passport did he use?
A man whose Law School Admission Test scores and grades at Columbia University
are known to have been mediocre, but was admitted to Harvard Law School through
the intervention of a Saudi named Khalid al-Mansour.
A law review editor who never published an article in any law review.
A lawyer with no significant accomplishments in the law and no reputation in the
legal community.
A former State and U.S. Senator, who never authored a piece of legislation.
A disciple of the Marxist Saul Alinsky.
A product of the Chicago political machine�the most corrupt political
organization in America.
A man who selects Marxists, corrupt politicians, and criminals as his close
political associates and personal friends.
A man whose presidential candidacy was endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of
America, the Socialist International, and the Workers International League.
A man lauded for the literary brilliance of two memoirs, both of which were
ghostwritten by others.
A so-called Christian who says that knowing when human life begins is �above his
pay-grade,� but somehow knows that abortion is permissible at any stage.
A man who thinks �waterboarding� is immoral, but that partial-birth abortion is
moral.
A man who publicly laments slavery in America�which was abolished 150 years
ago�but praises Islam, which still practices both slavery and the sexual
mutilation of young girls.
A man who speaks endlessly about helping the less fortunate, but gives almost
none of his sizeable income to charity�not even to his half-brother, who is
living in squalor in Kenya.
A man who had the most left-wing voting record in the United State Senate, but
was predicted by the press to �govern from the middle.�
A man who has never created a job, met a payroll, or even operated a lemonade
stand, but wants to tell Detroit how to make cars.
A President who has never before served as an executive in either the private or
the public sector.
A Commander-in-Chief who doesn�t know how to shoot a rifle, throw a
hand-grenade, drive a tank, fly a plane, or con a ship.
A Commander-in-Chief who has publicly divulged some of our nation�s most
important intelligence secrets.
A man who has been put in charge of the largest economic engine that ever
existed, but has never invested in the stock market and admits total ignorance
of it.
A President who says that science will guide his administration, but has no
education in the sciences.
A man who is proficient in reading what is written for him on a teleprompter,
but jerks and stammers his way through any off-the-cuff speaking.
A man whose health records are sealed from childhood to the present day.
A man whose educational records are sealed from childhood through law school.
A man who spent 20 years in a church whose pastor espouses Marxist Liberation
Theology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Semitism, but claims he
never heard his pastor utter anti-American, and anti-Semitic statements.
A man who added more to the National Debt in 100 days than all other Presidents
did in the past 220 years, yet feels qualified to lecture Americans about
�fiscal responsibility�.
A man who publicly expressed disdain for the U.S. Constitution on a Chicago
radio station because it limited the government�s ability to �redistribute
wealth.�
The first American President to bow before a foreign head of state�a Muslim
dictator.
A man who sits and listens submissively while his country is castigated by
Daniel Ortega�a Communist thug whose own daughter accused him of raping her.
A narcissist who gave the Queen of England a present from the United States --an
iPod containing recordings of his own speeches.
A so-called Christian who officially declared �Pride Month� for a lifestyle that
the Bible calls an abomination.
A man who wanted Americans to ignore his Muslim name during his election
campaign, yet boasts of his Muslim name when he travels to Muslim countries.
A man who can name hundreds of America�s shortcomings, yet none of its great
accomplishments.
A President who claims the moral high ground by closing Gitmo yet supports the
transfer of terror suspects to countries where horrific torture is certain.
A President who scoffed at being called a socialist yet acted to nationalize the
auto industry, the banking industry, and the insurance industry . . . and now
seeks to nationalize the healthcare industry.
A President who violates private property rights, the sanctity of contracts, and
the rule of law�three essential principles that go back over a thousand years in
the Common Law tradition.
A man who promised 95% of all Americans a tax cut, but is increasing taxes on
100% of the population through inflation�the cruelest tax of all.
A lawyer who represented ACORN�an organization now indicted in several states
for voter fraud�whose stated goal is to get as many people on welfare as
possible in order to destroy our financial system.
A President who cheated GM�s bondholders by giving their property to the UAW in
a political payoff.
An American President who frequently criticizes his own country when speaking in
foreign countries, but never praises America�s generosity, goodness or
greatness.
A President whose Secretary of the Treasury cheated on his taxes�as did several
other appointees and advisors.
A President who, despite the current federal debt of 100 trillion dollars, wants
to add the greatest debt ever by nationalizing healthcare.
A President who scoffs at being called a socialist, yet has appointed 28 �Czars�
to circumvent constitutional government, including:
A �Science Czar� who has advocated compulsory abortions for American women and
the �surrender of sovereignty� to a �comprehensive Planetary Regime.�
A self-professed communist as his �Green Jobs Czar�.
A �Pay Czar� to regulate the pay of corporate executives.
A President who swore an oath to �preserve, protect and defend the constitution
from all enemies, foreign and domestic,� yet has nominated a domestic enemy of
the Constitution to the Supreme Court.
A President whose Homeland Security Chief classified pro-lifers, veterans, and
supporters of traditional marriage as terrorists.
A President who stood silent while the Iranian government hacked unarmed
protestors to death with axes, because it was an internal matter, but freely
offers his opinions about the internal affairs of Israel and Honduras.
A President who decreed that true acts of terrorism must now be described as
�man-made disasters.�
A President who cracks hurtful jokes about Special Olympians.
A President who refused to intercept or inspect a North Korean ship virtually
certain to be carrying Weapons of Mass Destruction toBurma.
A President who wants to cancel all missile defenses while rogue nations are
developing long-range ballistic missiles.
An American President who blames the violence in Mexico on America.
A Commander in Chief who claims to have been unaware that Air Force One was
taken on a terrifying, low-level photo-op over Manhattan.
A President who berates American CEO�s for flying in private planes at private
expense on company business, but whose wife spends hundreds of thousands tax
payer dollars flying to Paris for a shopping spree.
A President who promised a transparent administration, but requires all
questions be screened before �impromptu� appearances.
A man who freely admitted that his energy policies are designed to bankrupt the
American coal industry.
A President who has presided over the loss of 14.7 million jobs and whose
�energy policy� will cause the loss of another 1 million jobs.
A President whose �energy policy� will increase the average American�s utility
bills by over $2,000 a year in the middle of the Great Recession.
A man about whom liberal journalist Tom Brokaw said, �There�s a lot about him we
don�t know.� . . .just one week before the election.

The vast majority of Americans do not know who he is, but someone surely does.
Someone paid for his travel expenses to Pakistan and Indonesia. Someone
engineered legal challenges to all of his election opponents for the State
Senate and had them disqualified. Someone straightened and leveled his path to
the U.S. Senate when a Democrat Judge made public the child custody records of
his Republican opponent. When he was a candidate for the U.S. Senate, someone
arranged for him to speak at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Someone
saw to it that all of his records were sealed, both at home and abroad. Someone
assembled the massive organization for his run for the Presidency. Someone knows
all about him.

"To admit our doubt and confusion to whites, to open up our psyches to
general examination by those who had caused so much of the damage in the first
place, seemed ludicrous, itself an expression of self-hatred"

I had heard
about this but a picture is definitely worth 1000 words! God save us!!!

Respect
Senator Barack Obama, Governor Bill Richardson, Senator Hillary Clinton and Ruth
Harkin stand during the national anthem.
Barack Hussein Obama's photo (that's his real name)......the article said he
REFUSED NOT ONLY TO PUT HIS HAND ON HIS HEART DURING THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE,
BUT REFUSED TO SAY THE PLEDGE.....how in heaven's name can a man like this
expect to be our next Commander-in-Chief????

Posted by Polarik on Saturday, November 22, 2008 5:09:00 AM

Polarik's final report:

Obama's 'Born' Conspiracy

Forged images, phony photos, and felony fraud

By Ron Polarik, PhD

Forward

The following report is the culmination of over four months of intensive,
empirical research whose sole purpose has been to determine if the images and
photographs posted on the Internet are true reproductions of a genuine document
purported to be Obama's original birth certificate. The idea for the research
actually began from the time when the first image was posted on June 12 to the
Daily Kos blog. I don't recall on which website I actually saw the story (most
likely World Net Daily), but the news had gone viral basically from the moment
that it hit the Internet.
Before seeing the image, I had no idea that Barack Obama's birthplace was in
question, or that his status as a natural-born US citizen had never been proven.
Like millions of other Americans, I believed the story he told about being born
in Hawaii to an American Mother (and a U.S. citizen) and an African Father (a
Kenyan national attending college on a student visa). I had no idea that this
issue would mushroom and take on a life of its own. What I did know, however,
was that from the first time I saw the Daily Kos image, or what I now call,
"Obama's bogus birth certificate," that something was just not right about it.
As someone who has scanned hundreds of thousands of documents in his lifetime, I
had a hard time accepting that this was an original scan image made from an
original paper document. As Fate would have it, right then, on June 13, I was
looking at the conclusive evidence that the text on this image had been
graphically altered, or "manufactured," as my first blog post would claim.
From that point onward, I had no inkling of what was to come. I had no idea that
I would wind up being the only person on the Planet (at that time) to have
spotted the anomalies that I knew were the by-products of intentional, graphic
alteration, and to go on record as stating that the Daily Kos image was a fake.
I was also not prepared for what came along with this knowledge, for what I had
to endure for making it public. Basically, I had painted a big bullseye on my
chest and my research findings, and the critics were now coming out of the
virtual woodwork taking shots at me personally, and my research, secondly. I had
started a new online game called, "Let's pile on Polarik," and every little
error I made was magnified into a major transgression. Yet, the crux of my
contention was never successfully refuted.
Now, if I had to do it all over again, I probably would not have done it at all,
knowing that I'd be spending the next four months conducting further research
and compiling evidence on not just the COLB image, but also the digital
photographs that were to follow two months later. The personal costs to me were
enormous, and I will not elucidate on them (but for those who know me, they also
know what were those costs). What began as sort of a curiosity turned into my
personal quest for the "Holy Grail," so to speak. I was guided only by the need
to uncover the truth, and by the constant harassment by my critics. Had they
left me alone from the beginning, I probably would not be writing this report
today.
I debated, long and hard, about the title of my report. Aside from it being
catchy, I ran the danger of being lumped into a group of false conspiracy
theorists, and brushed aside as an idiot wearing a "tinfoil hat." (Actually,
that's already happened, many times over). Perhaps there are a lot of false
conspiracies, including some really outlandish ones, but there would not be laws
on the books, both at a state level and a federal level, that specifically
mention the act of conspiracy when the purpose of that conspiracy is to either
engage in illegal activity, engage in a cover-up of that illegal activity, or
interfering with the investigation of that illegal activity. Conspiracy can
involve all of these. Yet, somehow, the word, "Conspiracy," has become a
pejorative for "nutty theories from the fringe," as if there has never been a
real "conspiracy."
Do you remember, or ever hear about, the "Watergate Conspiracy?" Do you
remember, or ever hear about, what happened to President Richard Nixon as a
result?
I would tell all of you who think that "conspiracies" are a joke and that the
people who claim to have found them are "idiots wearing tinfoil hats," to just
ask an FBI agent what he or she thinks about "conspiracy." Or, go ahead and ask
a federal judge what he or she thinks about "conspiracy."
"Conspiracy" is no laughing matter, ladies and gentlemen, and neither is
"document fraud," as in creating and
passing a counterfeit birth certificate.
I should now alert you to the fact that I have been using the phrase, "Bogus
birth certificate," as a euphemism for "Counterfeit birth certificate," which is
defined as, "A
copy or imitation of a state-issued birth certificate that is intended to be
taken as authentic and genuine in order to deceive another."
Sound familiar? According to
Authenticate-360:

Birth certificates
are generally used as �breeder� documents to gain other identity documents and
to perpetuate fraud. But unlike Social Security cards, birth certificates are
issued by hundreds, if not thousands, of entities, with little regard to
consistency or security. An accurately forged birth certificate is a dangerous
document, allowing the bearer significant access to everything from driver�s
licenses to passports...The increasing availability and affordability of
high-quality digital scanners and copiers is a constant threat to the
authenticity of government issued documents.

There are current Federal laws in place that prohibit the use of false identity
documents, such as a birth certificate, and they are spelled out in Chapter 18
of the United States Code, Section 1028, Fraud and
related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication
features, and information. In particular, there are specific
paragraphs that relate to the use of a false
identification document:

The term "false identification document" means a document of a type intended or
commonly accepted for the purposes of identification of individuals that - (A)
is not issued by or under the authority of a governmental entity or was
issued under the authority of a governmental entity but was subsequently altered
for purposes of deceit; and(B) appears to be issued by or under the
authority of the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a
State, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or
an international governmental or quasi-governmental organization.

What you are about to read in this report are well-documented facts arising from
evidence collected over a period of four months and subjected to intense
scrutiny and empirical evaluation. Given the overriding fact that the individual
whose identity document is in question, has repeatedly failed to provide a
genuine identity document, the charge that this individual, along with other
individuals, did conspire to proffer in its place, a false identification
document, is hereby levied by the American people, by way of one of its
citizens. To summarize the seriousness of these actions and this charge, and to
the importance of what is contained within this report:

There is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the COLB image created
and distributed by Obama's campaign to the Daily Kos, Annenberg's Factcheck, and
the St. Pete Times, Politifact, is, unquestionably, a false identification
document. Furthermore, there is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the
photos taken by Annenberg's Factcheck, in collusion with the Obama campaign, are
themselves, false identification documents, having been made from the
same false identification document image, as well as from additional
false identification documents created for the same purpose; namely, to
proffer these false identification documents as true reproductions of a
genuine, Hawaii-issued and certified, "Certification of Live Birth" document,
and thereby, intentionally deceive the American public into believing that
Barack Hussein Obama is a natural-born citizen of the United States, and
thereby, fully qualified to become their President.

I never imagined that my studies would amount to this. I thought, like most
Americans, that maybe the information was accurate even though the document
image was fake. I thought, like most Americans, that Obama would simply present
a copy of his real, original birth certificate, and that would be that. Yet,
here we are, more than
twenty months after Obama announced his candidacy for the Presidency,
and nearly three weeks after the election, and Obama still
refuses to show his real birth certificate!
Sadly, mainstream media have totally ignored this inconvenient truth and are not
even been willing to even look at this birth certificate issue. They are all
still in-the-tank with Obama, but even more so now that he is in line to be
President. They all bought into the lies and fraudulent documents proffered up
as evidence on Obama's qualifications. They have been too quick to label as
"trash" or "garbage" any legitimate questions asked about Obama's real birth
certificate. Even thigh-ranking governmental officials in the state of Hawaii
where Obama was allegedly born, won't reveal what's on Obama's original birth
certificate. All they have said is that they have it. They have not said
(1) where Obama was born. (2) when Obama was born, or (30 even
to whom Obama was born.
The answer to "What's on Barack Obama's real, original birth certificate" ranks
right up there with some of the great mysteries of our time -- and that is
really hard to swallow. That a man, with a dubious background, has been elected
to the highest office of the greatest superpower in the world without ever
having to prove who he says he is! That is not "nutty," that's just plain
insane!
With all that said, and without further ado, I present to you my final and
complete report on Barack Obama's bogus birth certificate, The Born
Conspiracy.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Since the beginning of Barack Hussein Obama�s Presidential campaign on February
11, 2007, there had been numerous rumors regarding Obama�s citizenship status.
Several reporters had asked for a copy of Obama�s birth certificate, however,
all requests were subsequently denied.

On or about June 12, 2008, the Daily Kos blog, a pro-Obama website, received an
image from the Obama Campaign that they claimed was a scanned copy of Obama�s
�original birth certificate,�. Before this document image was cropped to 2427 x
2369 pixels, it measured 2550 x 3300 pixels, or 8 1/2� x 11� when printed.

Also, on or about June 12, 2008, the Obama Campaign posted a smaller copy of the
same cropped image, measuring 1000 x 1024 pixels:

�You may have recently heard right-wing smears questioning Barack Obama's birth
certificate and citizenship. These assertions are completely false and designed
to play into the worst kind of stereotypes. You can see Barack Obama's birth
certificate for yourself and help push back with the truth...�

The very next day, which was on or about June 13, 2008, Obama�s Campaign
replaced the first document image they posted with a smaller copy which they
posted to a new website, �Fight The Smears� (fightthesmears.com). The smaller
image was disproportionately reduced to 585 x 575 pixels, which was almost half
the size of the original posted image, and one-third of its quality.

Also, on or about June 13, Politifact.org, a supposedly nonpartisan, fact
checking website that is unquestionably pro-Obama, published a copy of the same
image as that posted on the Daily Kos, but was also disproportionately reduced
it to 811 x 786 pixels, or 1/3 of its size and 1/6 of its image quality.

On or about June 16, 2008, Factcheck.org, a pro-Obama fact checking website
,posted a full-sized image copy of same document image that appeared on the
Daily Kos. Factcheck�s image copy was identical to the Daily Kos image copy
before that image was cropped. Factcheck.org is owned by the Annenberg Public
Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania; a center run by Obama
supporters and funded by the Annenberg Public Policy Center.

Factcheck.org made the following statement to explain how they received their
image copy:

"Bloggers raised questions based on the absence of evidence, specifically the
lack of a publicly available copy of a birth certificate and the supposed
secrecy surrounding it". According to FactCheck, Tommy Vietor at the Obama
campaign sent a message to them and "other reporters" saying, "I know there have
been some rumors spreading about Obama�s citizenship, so I wanted to make sure
you all had a copy of his birth certificate."

I first noticed that the image posted to the Daily Kos and purported to be the
�original birth certificate� of Barack H. Obama, did not look like a regular
birth certificate. This image was made only from the front side of a COLB: no
copy of the reverse side of this COLB has ever been made, :birth certificate�
document was ever scanned, a side that contains all of the official
certification instruments, such as the official Hawaiian Seal, State Registrar�s
signature, and date stamp of when the document was printed.

To validate my findings that the text in this COLB document image was the result
of graphic alternations, and not a result of any printer or scanner artifacts, I
made over 700 test scans and images using an actual paper COLB and different
scanners that were subjected to different combinations of scanning and image
parameters. I was finally able to replicate the Kos image so closely that other
image experts thought it was the same Kos image, and not my �clone.�

From this date forward, when I first discovered the evidence of tampering, and
regardless of the unfamiliar format of the COLB and the questionable information
it contained, I collected a great deal of additional evidence, that the scanned
image alleged to be a true copy of Obama�s original COLB was forged, and that
this altered image of an official state-issued document is nothing less than a
false
identification document as defined by Chapter 18, Section 1028 of
the United States Code.

All of my findings pertaining to a single source image and the four copies made
from of it that are still posted on the four (4) websites, DAILYKOS.COM,
FIGHTTHESMEARS.COM, FACTCHECK.ORG, and POLITIFACT.COM, as referred to and
described above, are outlined in my Final Report

On August 21, slightly more than two months after the publication of the image
on the Daily Kos and Obama's website, Factcheck published their story about nine
photos they claimed were allegedly taken of Obama's "real" COLB at his campaign
headquarters � the same COLB used to make the document image they posted on June
16.

There was no longer any question in my mind that the COLB image Factcheck posted
is a forgery and that Obama's real COLB, as proffered by Factcheck, is a
nonexistent document. However, Factcheck created a conundrum for me: if the
image Factcheck posted is a forgery of a nonexistent document image, then how
can any genuine photos be made of it? The answer had to be that both the image
and the photos were forgeries.

I have thoroughly examined the photographs that FactCheck published, and have
subsequently found clear and irrefutable evidence of tampering with both the
alleged COLB objects photographed and with the photos themselves. One of those
COLB objects was, in fact, a printout of a forged document image with the Seal
superimposed onto it for the final pictures.

FactCheck�s photos reveal both the absence of known, relevant features found on
genuine COLBs along with the presence of illogical and impossible features that
would never be found on a real 2007 COLB. Specifically, on the COLB objects
photographed, the security border closely matches the border found on a real
2007 COLB. However, both the embossed Seal and the State Registrar�s Signature
stamp do not
match the same elements found on a real 2007 COLB, but perfectly
match those found on a real 2008 COLB; or, in other words, something that would
never happen in real life.

Hawaii made three important changes to their COLBs from 2007 to 2008, including
the use of a larger certificate layout, a new security border, and, much to the
chagrin of Factcheck and the Obama Campaign, a new Seal and Signature stamp that
can now be stamped on a COLB by a machine.

With my experience and specialization in document imaging, my findings are
conclusive and irrefutable that the COLB images posted by Obama to his campaign
website,
fightthesmears.com, to the
dailykos.com, a pro-Obama blog, to
FactCheck.org, a pro-Obama political research group, and to
Politifact.org, are, in fact, image
forgeries with the intent to defraud the American People into
believing that these images were digitally scanned from Obama�s genuine,
�original� birth certificate.

With my experience and specialization in photography and digital imaging, my
findings are conclusive and irrefutable that the COLB photographs posted by
FactCheck.org, a pro-Obama political research group, and to
Politifact.org, are, in fact,
photographic forgeries with the intent to defraud the American
People into believing that these digital photographs were taken of Obama�s
genuine, �original� birth certificate.

To put it bluntly, the Factcheck photos have been "Frankensteined," just as the
Factcheck scan image was cobbled together with the parts of different COLBs. The
use of the term, "document" is simply for expediency sake, as no, single "real"
document was used for these photos or for the scan image.

By Polarik at 11:05 PM on 8/22/2008

By Polarik at 3:34 PM on 7/23/2008

By Polarik at 11:45 AM on 6/13/2008

Quit Church For POLITICAL, nor Moral, Reasons

Obama quits Chicago church steeped in controversy
2008-06-01
By TOM RAUM
ABERDEEN, S.D. - Barack Obama said Saturday he has resigned his 20-year
membership in the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago "with some sadness"
in the aftermath of inflammatory remarks by his longtime pastor, the Rev.
Jeremiah Wright, and more recent fiery remarks at the church by a visiting
priest.
"This is not a decision I come to lightly ... and it is one I make with some
sadness," Obama said at a news conference after campaign officials released a
letter of resignation he sent to the church on Friday.
"I'm not denouncing the church and I'm not interested in people who want me to
denounce the church," he said, adding that the new pastor at Trinity and "the
church have been suffering from the attention my campaign has focused on them."
Obama said he and his wife have been discussing the issue since Wright's
appearance at the National Press Club in Washington last month, which reignited
the furor over remarks Wright had made in various sermons at the church.
"I suspect we'll find another church home for our family," Obama said.
"It's clear that now that I'm a candidate for president, every time something is
said in the church by anyone associated with Trinity, including guest pastors,
the remarks will imputed to me even if they totally conflict with my long-held
views, statements and principles," he said.
"I have no idea how it will impact my presidential campaign but I know it was
the right thing to do for me and my family," he said.
"This was a pretty personal decision and I was not trying to make political
theater out of it," he added.
Trinity released a statement Saturday night saying: "Though we are saddened by
the news, we understand that it is a personal decision. We will continue to lift
them in prayer and wish them the best as former members of our Trinity
community."
For months, Obama has been hamstrung by the rhetoric of Wright, whose sermons
blaming U.S. policies for the Sept. 11 attacks and calls of "God damn America"
for its racism became fixtures on the Internet and cable news networks.
Initially, Obama said he disagreed with Wright but portrayed him as a family
member he couldn't disown. The preacher had officiated at Obama's wedding,
baptized his two daughters and been his spiritual mentor for some 20 years.
But six weeks after Obama's well-received speech on race, Wright claimed at the
Press Club appearance that the U.S. government was capable of planting AIDS in
the black community, praised Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan and
suggested that Obama was acting like a politician by putting his pastor at arm's
length while privately agreeing with him.
The next day, Obama denounced Wright's comments as "divisive and destructive."
Remarks by Wright inflamed racial tensions and posed an unwanted problem for
Obama, front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, as he sought to
wrap up the party's nod.
More recently, racially charged remarks from the same pulpit by another pastor,
the Rev. Michael Pfleger, kept the controversy alive and proved the latest thorn
in Obama's side. As a guest speaker at Obama's church, Pfleger mocked Obama
rival Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Although Obama condemned comments by both Wright and Pfleger, the controversy
persisted.
Obama made clear he wasn't happy with Pfleger's comments - in which the Catholic
priest pretended he was Clinton crying over "a black man stealing my show" - and
said he was "deeply disappointed in Father Pfleger's divisive, backward-looking
rhetoric, which doesn't reflect the country I see or the desire of people across
America to come together in common cause."
Pfleger issued an apology, saying he was sorry if his comments offended Clinton
or anyone else.
The timing of Obama's decision broke late Saturday, while most of the political
attention was focused on the Democratic National Committee's struggle to seat
delegates from Florida and Michigan.
Republican John McCain also has had his woes with religious leaders.
Earlier this month, McCain rejected endorsements from two influential but
controversial televangelists, saying there is no place for their incendiary
criticisms of other faiths.
McCain spurned the months-old endorsement of Texas preacher John Hagee after an
audio recording surfaced in which the preacher said God sent Adolf Hitler to
help Jews reach the promised land. McCain called the comment "crazy and
unacceptable."
He later repudiated the support of Rod Parsley, an Ohio preacher who has sharply
criticized Islam and called the religion inherently violent.
"This was one I didn't see coming," Obama said Saturday when he asked if he had
anticipated the firestorm that would erupt over his relationship with Wright.

Worse Than a Crypto jew--a Crypto Muslim

Malik holds a photo of Obama and him in Muslim dress, reportedly when the two
first met in 1985

Apparently the Obamas of Kenya have been reading those scurrilous emails to
which Barack likes to refer, because they have no doubt -- contrary to the
claims of the Obama campaign, that the presidential candidate was raised a
Moslem. They take that as a given.

As the Jerusalem Post reports, "Barack Obama's half brother Malik said Thursday
that if elected his brother will be a good president for the Jewish people,
despite his Muslim background. In an interview with Army Radio he expressed a
special salutation from the Obamas of Kenya."

The Obama brothers' father, a senior economist for the Kenyan government who
studied at Harvard University, died in car crash in 1982. He left six sons and a
daughter. All of his children - except Malik -- live in Britain or the United
States. Malik and Barack met in 1985.

In a remarkable denial issued last November that still stands on the official
campaign website, Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs issued a statement explaining
that "Senator Obama has never been a Muslim, was not raised as a Muslim, and is
a committed Christian."

Apparently Malik Obama, himself a Muslim, had not read the press release.

Melanie Phillips is the most recent commentator to draw attention to the massive
body of evidence that leaves no doubt that Barak Hussein Obama was born a Muslim
(Islam is patrilineal) and raised a Muslim (so registered in school,
acknowledging attending Islamic classes, reported accompanying his step-father
to the mosque, and able to recite the Koran in the original Arabic).

Reuven Koret, Aaron Klein and Daniel Pipes have previously pointed to the
attempts by Obama and his campaign to conceal the candidate's Muslim background.
The well documented evidence draws upon the on-the-ground interviews by
researchers in Indonesia and Kenya, published quotations of Obama's childhood
friends and his school records, as well as the candidate's own autobiography.

It is not clear whether Barack Obama will now disown his half-brother Malik, or
throw him under the campaign bus, for acknowledging that shared family
background. In any case, some one should notify "Fight the Smear" tout de suite.
Perhaps they can get him with the program.

Obama's anti-Christ "church"!

About Us

We are a congregation which is Unashamedly Black and Unapologetically Christian... Our roots in the Black religious experience and tradition are deep, lasting and permanent. We are an African people, and remain "true to our native land," the mother continent, the cradle of civilization. God has superintended our pilgrimage through the days of slavery, the days of segregation, and the long night of racism. It is God who gives us the strength and courage to continuously address injustice as a people, and as a congregation. We constantly affirm our trust in God through cultural expression of a Black worship service and ministries which address the Black Community.

The Pastor as well as the membership of Trinity United Church of Christ is committed to a 10-point Vision:

A congregation committed to ADORATION.

A congregation preaching SALVATION.

A congregation actively seeking RECONCILIATION.

A congregation with a non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA.

A congregation committed to BIBLICAL EDUCATION.

A congregation committed to CULTURAL EDUCATION.

A congregation committed to the HISTORICAL EDUCATION OF AFRICAN PEOPLE IN DIASPORA.

Actually, it is not Mohammed but Barack Obama's
middle name is
Hussein, the same last name as Saddam Hussein... But you won't be see
that on his campaign signs... Michael
> Barack Obama is a member of this church and is running for President
of the U.S. If you look at the first page of their website, you will
learn that this congregation has a non-negotiable commitment to
Africa. No where is AMERICA even mentioned. Notice too, what color you
will need to be if you should want to join Obama's church...
B-L-A-C-K!!! Doesn't look like his choice of religion has improved
much over his (former?) Muslim upbringing.
>
> Are you aware that Obama's middle name is Mohammed? Strip away his
nice looks, the big smile and smooth talk and what do you get?
Certainly a racist, as plainly defined by the stated position of his
church! And possibly a covert worshiper of the Muslim faith, even today.
>
> This guy desires to rule over America while his loyalty is totally
> vested in a Black Africa!

Because
of the urgency of getting this message out I have not checked it

out, but I know the man who sent it to me and he is trustworthy. We can

almost rest assured that if Obama is elected president his oath will not be

taken on the holy bible; but even if it is it will be a sacred lie. Let's
spread

this as far and wide as we can send it. I have sent it to the Ron Paul

headquarters and will be sending it to the rest of the candidates today.

OBAMA'S CHURCH??

Obama mentioned his church during his appearance
with Oprah. It's the
Trinity Church
of Christ. I found this interesting. Obama's
church:
Go to this church's website and read what
is written there. It is most alarming.
Barack Obama
is a member of this church and is running
for President of the U.S. If you look at the
first page of their website, you will learn that
this congregation has a
non-negotiable commitment to Africa. No where is
AMERICA even mentioned. Notice too, what color
you will need to be if you should want to
join Obama's church... B-L-A-C-K!!! Doesn't look
like his choice of religion has improved much
over his (former?) Muslim upbringing.
Are you aware that Obama's middle name is
Hussein? Strip away his nice looks, the big
smile and smooth talk and what do you get?
Certainly a racist, as plainly defined by the
stated position of his church! And possibly a
covert worshiper of the Muslim religion, even
today. And this guy desires to rule over
America while his loyalty is probably vested
in Black Muslim, Africa!
I am saddened to see that this has not been all
over the TV and newspapers.
This is why it is so important to pass this
message along to all of our family & friends. To
think that Obama has even the slightest chance
in the run for the presidency, is really scary.
Click on the link below:
This is the web page for the church B.Hussein
Obama belongs to:

1.
Barack Obama Book Admits Drug Use

Barack Obama�s admission in a 1995 memoir that he used cocaine and marijuana
could come back to haunt him if he seeks the White House in 2008.

Obama�s �Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance� was written not
long after he graduated from law school, where he was the first black person
elected editor of the "Harvard Law Review."

It was reissued in 2004 and became a best seller, along with his new work �The
Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.�

With �Dreams From My Father,��� the Democratic senator from Illinois has become
the first potential presidential candidate to admit trying cocaine, although he
rejected heroin.

�Pot had helped, and booze,� he wrote about his high school days. �Maybe a
little blow when you could afford it. Not smack, though.�

He also wrote: �Junkie. Pothead. That�s where I�d been headed: the final, fatal
role of the young would-be black man . . . I got high [to] push questions of who
I was out of my mind.�

Obama�s African father returned to Kenya when Barack was 2 years old, leaving
him to be raised by his white mother and grandparents.

�Obama�s revelations were not an issue during his Senate campaign two years
ago,� The Washington Post reports; but now, with a possible presidential
campaign looming, �his open narrative of early, bad choices, including drug use
starting in high school and ending in college, as well as his tortured search
for racial identity, are sure to receive new scrutiny . . .

�It was not so long ago that such blunt admissions would have led to a
candidate�s undoing, and there is uneasiness in Democratic circles that �Dreams
From My Father� will provide a blueprint for negative attacks.�

Obama�s spokesman Robert Gibbs sought to downplay any negative effects from the
drug disclosures, telling the Post: �I believe what the country is looking for
is someone who is open, honest, and candid about themselves rather than someone
who seems endlessly driven by polls or focus groups.�

Obama himself has expressed no regrets about the drug disclosures. In a preface
to the new edition of his memoir, he wrote that he would tell the same story
today �even if certain passages have proven to be inconvenient politically.�

Editor's Note:

Monday,
January 22, 2007 8:29 AM

He announced
today.

Probable U. S.
presidential
candidate,
Barack Hussein
Obama was born
in Honolulu,
Hawaii, to
Barack Hussein
Obama, Sr., a
black Muslim
from
Nyangoma-Kogel,
Kenya and Ann
Dunham, a white
atheist from
Wichita,
Kansas.
Obama's parents
met at the
University
of
Hawaii.

When Obama
was two years
old, his parents
divorced.
His father
returned to
Kenya.
His mother then
married Lolo
Soetoro, a
radical Muslim
from
Indonesia.
When Obama was 6
years old, the
family relocated
to
Indonesia.
Obama attended a
Muslim school in
Jakarta.
He also spent
two years in a
Catholic school.

Obama
takes great care
to conceal the
fact that he is
a Muslim.
He is quick to
point out that,
he was once a
Muslim, but that
he also attended
Catholic school.
Obama's
political
handlers are
attempting to
make it appear
that Obama's
introduction to
Islam came via
his father, and
that this
influence was
temporary at
best. In
reality, the
senior Obama
returned to
Kenya
soon after the
divorce, and
never again had
any direct
influence over
his son's
education. Lolo
Soetoro, the
second husband
of Obama�s
mother, Ann
Dunham,
introduced his
stepson to
Islam.
Osama was
enrolled in a
Wahabi school in
Jakarta.
Wahabism is the
radical teaching
that is followed
by the Muslim
terrorists who
are now waging
Jihad against
the western
world.

Since it
is
politically
expedient to be
a Christian when
seeking major
public
office in the
United
States,

(Hmmm...I
thought is was a
Constitutional
REQUIREMENT!)

Barack Hussein
Obama has joined
the
United
Church
of Christ in
Chicago
in an attempt to
downplay his
Muslim
background.

You do
understand that
Obama is now the
leading
candidate to
oppose the
Republican
nominee in the
next presidential
election.

Bill Levinson:
We do not, to the best of our knowledge, know of any racist or anti-Semitic
statements that Obama has made himself. He either does not understand or just
doesn't care, however, that his promotion and solicitation of bigots empowers
and enables their bigotry against Jews, white people in general, and/or
Catholics.

(1) Obama belongs to a church whose pastor said that "white America" got "its
wake up call" after 9/11, and that Israel occupies Palestinian land illegally.
Jeremiah Wright also compared the United States to Iraq under Saddam Hussaein.

The same church has a "non-negotiable commitment to Africa." Don't most
Christian churches have non-negotiable commitments to the teachings of Jesus,
along with the equality of all human beings regardless of race or ethnicity?
Obama's church also gave an award to the vicious anti-Semite and racist Louis
Farrakhan, although it must be said that Obama distanced himself from Farrakhan.

(2) Obama endorsed Al Sharpton and his National Action Network, both of which
have a long track record of promoting hatred of white people and especially
Jews.

The Jews who are considering voting for Obama (or Clinton) should be doing a lot
more research. Even if they don't care if Israel is wiped off the map, do you
really want a man whose Church gives out awards to people like Louis Farrakhan?
Do you want a man whose volunteers sit under Che Guevara posters (according to
the picture shown on KRIV-TV iin Texas)?

How many times can a voter turn his head and pretend that he just doesn't see?

If I've made a mistake, please debunk me. Until then, I guess I'll have to
believe what I see.
Just a reminder: I am a U.S. citizen who pays taxes and I have every right to
express my opinion on candidates running in an election in which I plan to
vote.I don't mind telling you: It won't be for Barack Obama.

Don't worry, Naomi, NJDC
has burrowed so deeply into the hole that it just pulled in after it that it
won't come out until Groundhog Day in 2009, much less by Election Day in 2008,
to say a word against you. As for the Che Guevara picture, here is a screenshot.

Obama's Pastor sounds more like a hate spewing imam. I am shocked this hasn't
gotten real media play (oh yeah, it's Obama.) The more you peel back the layers
of the Obama onion, the more rotten it is at its core.

[Per Tucker Carlson, quoting Jeremiah Wright]: Nine-eleven, he says: "White
America got their wake-up call after 9-11. White America and the Western world
came to realize people of color had not gone away, faded in the woodwork, or
just disappeared as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring black
concerns." So 9-11 was payback for white racism. I mean, it goes on, and I will
read more.

Barack Obama is a member of Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ. Its
minister, and Obama's spiritual adviser, is the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. In
1982, the church launched Trumpet Newsmagazine; Wright's daughters serve as
publisher and executive editor. Every year, the magazine makes awards in various
categories. Last year, it gave the Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award to
a man it said 'truly epitomized greatness.' That man is Louis Farrakhan.

Maybe for Wright and some others, Farrakhan 'epitomized greatness.' For most
Americans, though, Farrakhan epitomizes racism, particularly in the form of
anti-Semitism. Over the years, he has compiled an awesome record of offensive
statements, even
denigrating the Holocaust by falsely attributing it to Jewish cooperation with
Hitler. "They helped him get the Third Reich on the road." His history is a
rancid stew of lies.

"Barack Obama is an anti-Semite," said Gabriel, who founded the nonprofit
organization American Congress for Truth following the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks. "No Jews should support him. Jews should vote for Hillary Clinton."

We don't agree with the latter statement because Clinton also promoted Al
Sharpton while backing MoveOn.org's insult to General David Petraeus, and we
will vote for McCain in November. However, Aesop was right about birds of a
feather flocking together. Obama surrounds himself with so many anti-Semites,
racists, and other bigots that it is difficult not to take him for one himself.

The ascent of Barack Obama from state senator in Illinois to a leading contender
for the Presidential nomination in the span of just a few years is remarkable.
Especially in light of a noticeably unremarkable record - a
near-blank slate of few accomplishments and numerous missed votes.

However, in one area of foreign policy that concerns millions of Americans, he
does have a record and it is a particularly troubling one. For all supporters of
the America-Israel relationship there is enough information beyond the glare of
the klieg lights to give one pause. In contrast to his canned speeches filled
with "poetry" and uplifting aphorisms and delivered in a commanding way, behind
the campaign fa�ade lies a disquieting pattern of behavior.

One seemingly consistent theme running throughout Barack Obama's career is his
comfort with aligning himself with people who are anti-Israel advocates.

Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as
commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a
nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim
Jong Il, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the
nuclear option was off the table against terrorists -- something no president
has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s.

Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those
remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national
security at risk.

How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes.
Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine?
Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big
Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck.

Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium
rally by saying, "All praise and glory to God!" but says that Christian leaders
speaking for life and marriage have "hijacked" Christianity. He is
pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who
will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views
of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing.
His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that
direction. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francisco values, not
Middle America values.

Obama is not merely pro-partial birth abortion, he is pro-live birth abortion as
shown by his central role in derailing Illinois 'Born Alive Infants Protection
Act' and even NARAL Pro-Choice America did not oppose the Federal version.

The consensus is that Barack Obama promotes anti-Semitism, racism, and/or hatred
of Israel.
All decent people must stand up on the Internet and in letters to the editor to
expose the phony smile on top of the empty suit.

Posted by Bill Levinson @ 5:18 pm |

Ted Belman

+1 416 256 7597

The Obama First Family

Obama 'First Family' Photos?
From South African Source
5-24-8

How come
we haven't seen or known about
some of these...?

We know
Hillary but do we know him --
the media darling?

Barack
Obama's grandmother, Sarah
Hussein Onyango Obama

U.S.
Presidential hopeful Barack
Obama's Uncle has been a
prisoner in his own home,
Trapped by post election
violence that has left More than
600 Kenyans dead. 'If Barack
Obama

Were
elected, he would improve
relations between Africa and
America because he had his roots
in Africa', his uncle said.

Barak,
left, and himself, middle, and
an unidentified friend in his
shop in eastern Kenya.

By Karel
Prinsloo, AP

Luo
dancers from the Senator Barack
Obama Primary School.

Barack
has stated his support for Luo
Raila Odinga (Opposition Leader
in Kenya who signed a 'Shariah
pact' With Muslims and claims to
be Obama's Cousin) and is
married to Ida Odinga.

They
have four children - two sons
and Two daughters. His oldest
son, Fidel, is Named after Fidel
Castro.

Barack's
father, Muslim, hard-drinker,
Was married three times,
attended Harvard and returned to
Kenya. Obama claims he was an
atheist, But he was raised
Muslim and was Given a Muslim
burial at Barack's family's
request.

With
mother Stanley Ann Dunham. In
his own Autobiography Obama
writes, 'How and when The
marriage occurred remains a bit
murky, a Bill of particulars
that I have never quite had The
courage to explore.' (His father
was still Married to his first
wife Kezia in Kenya at The
time.)

Abandoned by his father and
shipped off by his Mother to his
white grandparents, Barry Sotero
Becomes Barack Hussein Obama.
Obama would Describe his
grandparents as 'white folk.'
(Yeah, 'white folk' that would
NOT abandon You, their
grandchild.

Shame on
you Obama.)

Barack
stands behind Kezia (stepmother)
in a Kenyan family shot.
(Including brother Abongo 'Roy'
Obama who is a Luo activist and
A 'Militant Muslim' who argues
that the black man must
'liberate Himself from the
poisoning influences of European
culture.' ) 'Abongo's new
lifestyle has left him lean and
clear-eyed, and at The wedding,
he looked so dignified in his
black African gown With white
trim and matching cap that some
of our guests Mistook him for my
father,' Obama wrote in Dreams
From My Father.

Obama's
visit to Africa '06

(Where
are the transcripts of the
speeches He gave here?
Campaigning for Odinga? Wouldn't
it be great to be able to read
these? Do the people of the
state of Illinois know About
Obama's radical background?)

SINCE
CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, AND THE NEW
YORK TIMES WILL NOT SHOW THESE
PICTURES, WILL YOU FORWARD THESE
TO THE (APPROXIMATE NUMBER) 200
MILLION AMERICANS THAT HAVE
INTERNET ACCESS? THANK YOU.

THE
ABOVE CAPTIONS HAD SOME MENTION
OF 'MILITANT MUSLIMS' AND
'SHARIA LAW'. HERE IS A WEBSITE
THAT TELLS YOU ALL ABOUT THEM
(ALSO CALLED ISLAMIC TERRORISTS)
AND THE END RESULTS OF THEIR LAW
http://www.thereligionofpeace.....com/