Romney exposed the new orthodoxy of the 1% in his visit to Israel, economic success is down to "cultural" differences. Similar arguments were deployed against the ghettos of Germany in the 1930's, with disastrous consequences for all. The current Israeli generation seem to have a very short memory...

Romney, with his foot in the mouth decease embarrasses America on his maiden voyage as the Republican presidential candidate for president. First Romney thinks he’s some great savior of Olympics so he figures he can mouth off to a host country about what is wrong with their Olympics. Folks this brag about Romney and his saving the Salt lake city Olympics has to be expose so us voters realize that it was us TAXPAYERS that saved the Salt Lake City Olympics and not Romney! Us TAXPAYERS gave I believe it was 2 billion dollars or maybe it was hundreds of millions of dollars to the people who ran the Salt Lake Olympics to get the Salt Lake Olympics running.Romney then took over the Salt Lake Olympics to get it running and guess what folks?!Romney started doling out contracts to his rich buddies as he and his buddies enriched themselves from this Olympic venture. And then guess what folks, after the Olympics Romney,had all the records of his dealings with the Salt Lake Olympics destroyed! Tricky Dick is BACK! Romney won’t show us his or his wife’s tax returns either! Yes Ann Romney we know your husband Mitt is using you to hide his overseas investments from taxes! So after mouthing off to the Britain’s Romney goes to over to the Middle East and continues to stick his foot in his mouth by saying things that infuriate the whole Muslim world by saying he is going to move the American embassy in Israel to Jerusalem and that the Palestinians are somehow economically less prosperous because of their culture. Only someone who doesn't understand the situation would say something so callous like that. The Palestinians had to exist as a third world people all these years because Israel had kept them like a rat in a box and suppressed any kind of economic development in the West Bank and Gaza strip. What international company of any kind would want to open a branch company in the West Bank and Gaza! Then Romney would give the green light to Israel to build all the settlements they want on Palestinian land which will cause much more conflict with the Palestinians and make the Arab revolutions that is sweeping the Middle East to come to the West Bank and also make Egypt throw the peace treaty that it signed with Israel into the garbage as they too join the Palestinian fight against Israel. Then Romney says he will give the green light to Israel to attack Iran which would bring us Americans into another unnecessary war. A war with Iran would evolve into a major war whose casualties would be on American soil too as it will probably destroy Israel beyond the point of repair.Then Romney goes to Poland and says that we shouldn’t have given up the missile defense system that was suppose to be built in Poland because Romney still in his cold war mentality thinks that Russia is a threat to the world. Romney just wants to enrich his buddies in the military industrial complex with the building of this system as well as his intention on increasing the military budget so again to stabilize his paranoiac cold war mentality and enrich himself and his buddies in the military industrial complex. Romney is no good for America! It’s plain and simple as that! Read www.mybetteramericaplan.com to see why Romney and the Republicans are bad for America in many ways and how we can correct our economic mess by creating a whole new government described on the web page.

I must apologize to you for the lack of paragraphs and also explain; you see I do not use the computers myself, I simply write on paper or dictate, my personal aide posts for me but from this moment on I will make sure that she separates my comments in paragraphs for your benefit and that of those who may feel offended by this, I will make sure that she complies in all of the eight languages that I write in. I will research schools for paragraphing in Luxembourg to take an improvement course but I will tell you what we do have here; excellent etiquette schools for people in desperate need of good manners.

As to my “pomposity” perhaps you are right but you must realize that my thoughts are in other languages as we speak at least three in my country and then I must translate then in to English, it could also be that I do not communicate with the so called “street or common language of the vulgar.” I have tried to keep it as simple and as plain as I can but alas this too I will keep in consideration since I value your opinion.

As you see I have taken your critique to heart, I am a reasonable and flexible person willing to listen to advise but I must now point to you; whether my writings are pompous or in lack of paragraphs this is of no consequence, what is important is the message, try to go back and read it as I have done with yours since I took the time to as they say “put it out there”, it may be possible that you may learn something from it of simply disagree with what I write and if you decide to get back to me with a comment let it be of a more constructive nature.

Perhaps it would be best for me to simply keep entertaining myself with other more pleasurable entertainment since I have the means to do whatever my little heart desires but I am concerned about several serious important issues while you my dear friend simply worry about the “paragraphs”. For your information this is not a writing contest it is a forum of ideas to be expressed and commentaries on the articles.

Do not take my response as an attack on you person, it is simply a reminder that we shall always act with decorum even if we are in discord with each other and focus on the “important” and not the menial.

It's, indeed, all about votes in a country on the other side of the ocean. Yet the choice of Britain, Israel and Poland is for me a very clear and edifying message. The "senior figures" of these countries, actually I only have the Polish ones in mind, mean next to nothing to me (well, some of the ones in Poland should really be behind bars). But what Romney said in Nevada would win my vote any day.

I think that Romney can count himself unfortunate. His normal business approach of questioning the way that an entity conducts business, in order to lessen its value,doesn't work in diplomacy. This was normally done so that he could then buy it at a bargain price and sell off the parts for more than the value of the whole . His attempt to devalue the British approach to the Olympic Games was designed to inflate the value of his own attempts in that area (the Salt Lake City Winter games in 2002).

The discovery of the Higgs boson has also taken away publicity from his own discovery in physics. What I'm referring to is the proof he gave in his recent visit to Israel, that, in spite of commonly accepted evidence to the contrary, the tail actually wags the dog.

Hopefully before the election, the American people will realize, what a brilliant polymath they have in candidate Romney.

One would think that a Christian Prince from a church in Idaho would make a pilgrimage to the Church of the Nativity, Bethlehem, now a World Heritage site & the Church of the Holy Sepulchre*, Jerusalem, built by the Christian Prince, Constantine!
*soon to be WHS

I agree, whole heartedly. Romney should visit the Church of the Nativity. I understand that part of the entertainment there is regular physical fights between rival priests. Romney could use his Olympic experience to help set up contest rules.

I have read many comments and posts in favor and against both candidates for the presidency of the United States some a bit strong but I dare say non in the form of such a virulent and vehement personal attack. Do you know the Romney family personally or any of those people that you propose should be taxed at 100%? and if so have they done something so horrible to you that merits the inclusion of physical violence? I understand that this is a forum for debates not for the slaughter of personalities or a specific class of our society, I do believe that you can voice your opinion in a more moderate manner for the benefit of the less “emotional” if you will and try a bit not to fall below Mr. Romney's somewhat reprehensible attitude on his resent visit to England but to his credit he is not a dumb animal as you describe, perhaps just an American “Nouveau Riche” with a bit to learn about courtesy and manners as is to be expected of many of them but you do no only execute Mr. Romney's character in your post but a whole class of people whom you do not know and that greatly contribute to all government programs, let me rephrase this, practically pay for all of them it does not matter if it is a fraction of their money or a lot this is a fact which your are ignoring in your rather poisonous descriptions. May I remind you that it is not corporations that “suck” at people they merely employ them it is government that illegally drain the pockets of their citizens (read you own constitution) allow me to point out that there are many “good human beings” in all social classes, perhaps some greedy rich and also many poor people who are ungrateful, ill intended and envious of others success which are the ugliest kind, you are also wrong in stating that wealthy people do not care or that they are oblivious to the problems of our society, our environment and Etc. I doubt that you may know any of those people but I will inform you that I travel extensively and in my experience it is not the people who ruin the earth it is the governments of those countries who also tax their people and corporations and do nothing about it (mainly in socialist countries) If you reside in the U.S.A. Then your complaint about this is less than valid and I have no reason to be a “blatant and shameless hypocrite” I will not divulge what class I belong to but I certainly do not represent a manufacturing or a large corporation. Before I finish I would like to ask another question; what makes YOU think that any of the rich and wealthy will tolerate to be taxed at 100% or 75% or even 50%? and much less that someone should slap them on the mouth? Who is going to try do this deed, perhaps you madame Marlowe? I use my real name, I do not know if Marlowe is yours but if you are using it as a pen name in honor of Mosieur Christopher Marlowe let me take this opportunity to remind you of his reputation, not as a writer but as a rake-hell among other nasty tributes, but maybe this is why you chose this name. As a friend I urge you to take a good look at your life, at yourself, your accomplishments etc. before you verbally charge against a person or persons in such a hysterical manner, spewing this hatred that you personally may feel for reasons unknown to other readers in a public forum.

I must apologize to you for the lack of paragraphs and also explain; you see I do not use the computers myself, I simply write on paper or dictate, my personal aide posts for me but from this moment on I will make sure that she separates my comments in paragraphs for your benefit and that of those who may feel offended by this, I will make sure that she complies in all the eight languages that I write in. I will research schools for paragraphing in Luxembourg to take an improvement course but I will tell you what we do have here; excellent etiquette schools for people in desperate need of good manners.

As to my “pomposity” perhaps you are right but you must realize that my thoughts are in other languages as we speak at least three in my country and then I must translate then in to English, it could also be that I do not communicate with the so called “street or common language of the vulgar.” I have tried to keep it as simple and as plain as I can but alas this too I will keep in consideration since I value your opinion.

As you see I have taken your critique to heart, I am a reasonable and flexible person willing to listen to advise but I must now point to you; whether my writings are pompous or in lack of paragraphs this is of no consequence, what is important is the message, try to go back and read it as I have done with yours since I took the time as they say “to put it out there”, it may be possible that you may learn something from it or simply disagree with what I write and if you decide to get back to me with a comment let it be of a more constructive nature.

Perhaps it would be best for me to simply keep entertaining myself with other more pleasurable entertainment since I have the means to do whatever my little heart desires but I am concerned about several serious important issues while you my dear friend simply worry about the “paragraphs”. For your information this is not a writing contest it is a forum of ideas to be expressed and commentaries on the articles.

Do not take my response as an attack on you person, it is simply a reminder that we shall always act with decorum even if we are in discord with each other and focus on the “important” and not the menial.

Again, good grief. Thanks for the paragraphs because, as opposed to what you seem to believe, the format also counts. IF I POSTED ALL IN CAPS IT WOULD NOT BE POLITE TO READERS AS IT IS DISTRACTING AND IT TAKES AWAY FROM THE MESSAGE. I don't think I need to comment on the difficult of reading, especially on a computer screen, a mass of text with no paragraph breaks.

As for your pomposity, is there no end to it? I don't really care if your 'personal aide' posts for you in 108 languages. I could go on about myself, too, as could many of the posters here who have impressive credentials and accomplishments, but talk about lack of manners, sheesh. I spent a number of years in Europe and while there were a lot of things I adored about it, pomposity such as yours I do not miss.

Thank you for your remarks, you did make me smile with the last one about that crazy Ms. Marlowe, you may be right about our pomposity but believe me it is not intentional in my case this could be simply difference of personalities, beside having a very strong character I am used to saying things in one way and perhaps some of my phrases suffer in the translation.

I am quite sure that most of the people that write on this forum are well informed and many probably very accomplished, my comment was not to raise above anyone for I do not even know them, it is true about the reading on the screen, most of the time I read everything printed not directly on the computer. On the defense of my helper well she thought she was saving space and that my huge “screeches” would not fit in the box. Do not worry I am not going to dismiss her, she is my right hand even with some of the silly plunders. (but all the time!!!)

I do not want to be compared with Mr. Romney's behavior in England, I do not mind if you call me pompous or conceited etc. So I can try to correct myself if I offend anyone in the process of voicing my opinions.

Mr. Romney demonstrated a lack of tact and diplomatic skills in London.

Perhaps he will be more successful with his former Wall Street peer and friend in Israel. Mr. Romney and Netanyahu have been friends since they were Wall Street Traders at the Boston Consulting Group in Boston in the 1970's.

Any success Mr. Romney has in Israel would show more that Wall Street peers stick together than any real diplomatic skills. Most people can get along with those they have worked with and known for over 30 years.

Diplomats build bridges and working relationships with those they don't know and have little in common with.

Mr Netnayahu says Mr Romney was no friend of his. According to yesterday's Sunday Times, the Israeli leader said "I knew Mr Romney but we never connected" or words to that effect. It was on the Sunday Times yesterday.

Romney has a 50/50 chance of becoming the United State's 45th president, so I don't know what PM Gillard and the Australian Nanny State will do if that happens. Other than that, I hope Boris "Bad Haircut" Johnson, the Mayor of Europe, wasn't too offended by Mitt the Twit's interview with NBC's Brian Williams.

NBC, as I'm sure you know, was panned for it's coverage of London's Opening Ceremony. Matt Lauer was creepy (or said the huge NHS balloon baby was) and Meredith Vieira bragged about her ignorance. She had no idea who Tim Berners-Lee is, or that DARPA didn't invent the World Wide Web.

I think Romney made a bit of a miscalculation by being in the London area during the Olympics. He should have known that the Brits would be a little sensitive to any remarks not completely gushing about the Olympics staging.
Sure enough, being the businessman he is, he dared to point out a couple of minor potential problems. Oh the horrors!
Oh well, the Brits will get over that little flap with a properly placed apology. After all they DO know which side their toast is buttered upon.
As far as NBC and Meridith, the Brits must realize she isn't a computer scientist, so why in the world should she recognize the name of Tim Berners-Lee, the developer of a steering wheel, aka the World Wide Web.
Most likely she was thinking of the actual automobile, aka the internet. That would probably be the reason she thought of DARPA and or the American government.

Well, I think chatting up anyone riding the Tube is quite a bit different than co-hosting the 2012 Olympics Opening Ceremony with a viewership of 40 million people. There was an advanced media guide, so Meredith should have done background research as to why there would be a tribute to some bloke named Tim Berners-Lee.

And to be perfectly honest, I exaggerated a little. Meredith did not mention DARPA. I mentioned it as a off-hand reference to Pres. Obama's exaggeration that DARPA invented the internet so private companies could make money off it (and then end up suing each other over patent infringement, i.e. Apple v. Samsung).

The last time the US had an administration run by former CEOs, a "business, nothing personal" approach to governing was embarked upon and nearly destroyed our American brand of free market capitalism. Romney seeks to double down on this failed approach. His gaffes are minor in comparison to his absence of an agenda beyond sound bites. His carpet bombing of his Republican rivals during the primaries has served to expose him now that the media has him to focus on; he can't simply yell "squirrel!" to deflect attention. After running for president for nearly a decade one would imagine that he would have been better coached.

The GOP decided early on that they would paralyze all government business like petulant children, then blame the fallout on the president. This strategy has been astoundingly successful. Yet, for all of President Obama's supposed shortcomings and policy failures, this is the best candidate a party in decline, the once mighty GOP, could muster in response.

Romney has just proved his kindergarten level intellect. Money, money, money, where is the nearest offshore tax shelter? 14.9% tax on an income over 20 million dollars. While a secretary who earns one thousand times less pays 35%.
The fact the Republicans would vote for this guy, amazes me that the party Abraham Lincoln, is now the party of corruption and incompetence. Has anyone found any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq recently? Is the military-industrial complex controlling government? Where is the next war to be declared?

You may count on Obama's handmaidens of the press, among whom the Economist occupies a vanguard position, to look for the smallest trifle to make Romney look bad. His worries about Olympic security, echoing weeks of similar fears by the press and politicians in the United Kingdom, is a prime example. At the same time, they will forget to mention Obama's many missteps on the global stage. The bows to foreign potentates on the apology tour, the return of Churchill's bust in the mistaken belief (as it turns out) that his father was tortured by British colonial authorities, the gift of a boxed set of his speeches that could not be played even if the Queen or the prime minister, whoever was the recipient of this largesse, had tried. Obama can do no wrong and Romney no right in the eyes of the president's idolators in the media. Fortunately, the gatekeeper era is rapidly closing and more and more people are agape at the emperor's nudity.

"Obama can do no wrong and Romney no right in the eyes of the president's idolators in the media."
Really?
Perhaps on Planet Delusional from which you and the rest of you frothing at the mouth, right-wing trolls hail from, where your media there, known on Earth as FOX "News" occupies a vanguard position, to look for the smallest trifle to make Obama look bad, but back on Earth where we live, there is this article in this weeks Economist that tries to be a bit more objective:http://www.economist.com/node/21559630
"With luck the debate will push either Mr Obama or Mr Romney to do that. At the moment, neither seems to understand the central domestic challenge of the next presidency."
Seems to me that its slagging both candidates.

Nice job. I doubt that strawman will ever climb up off the canvas. You must have thunder in those mitts of yours. Every sensible granny should fear you.
As for the Economist, its efforts at down-the-middle always come across as half-hearted when not, as in this instance, false. Both Obama and Romney understand what's at stake in the next presidency. Will it be the further growth of government and a vassal state or a course change toward limits to centralized power? The question is whether Romney will govern as a conservative when elected or as a RINO like when Jorge was in the White House.

It is just amazing to see this man back track all the time. He nuanced his London olympic game remarks and back tracked once more. It just can't understand what americans outside its own mormon congregation see in this man. This is one more sign that we are in deep trouble worldwide, as this man could easily become much more disliked than the Bush/Cheney administration worldwide, should he be elected. It is ironic that he got engaged in this international trip to show americans that he can be a respected figure worldwide and he failed, though he claims to be a successful person hence worthy of the highest office in the USA. America has lost it, and I doubt they will ever come back given their stubbornness to elect presidents with more religious faith than brain. I am simply appalled beyond words.

Did you expect The Guardian to have anything positive to say about Romney? The newspaper is a mouthpice for the Labour Party. The article's author, Nicholas Watt, is madly tweeting away at this very moment under the hashtag #romneyshambles.

We are fed up to hear Mr Romney's interpretation of how Mr Obama sees the world. We would like, for once to hear what he (Romney)really has in mind to do for his country. I mean what actions, what changes in external relations or internal policy does he really believes in? All we hear from him is criticism for others. Too easy. Get lost.

Please spare ne, from what I have seen until now, I do not want to listen to this man ever again. He is not just boring like hell, but constructs sentences full of adverbs and adjectives that are completely void of any real meaning. The british prime minister said it best, organizing olympic games in the middle of nowhere is not something to brag about. Don't forget that he could have added mostly that they were winter games and hence nots as extensive, probably kept it quiet out of respect for the IOC and host nations of past winter games. Romney cannot get the simple stuff right, and I don't see how he can do better with more complex issues.

Too late for that: insinuating the incompetence of America's 'special relationship' ally in his first destination. What's he going to do in Poland and Israel? They'll be at war with the US by the time Romney gets home.

Mitt Romney is one of these truly reprehensible RobberBarons whom all should be taxed at 100%, and then smacked HARD right in the MOUTH, for good measure. Actually, they, the likes of MITT ROMNEY and HIS filthy ilk, bring nothing AT ALL of value to society; Rather they suck away at society and destroy anything and anyone in their idiot-paths. In fact, they need RESTRAINTS because these people are truly insane with GREED; And they are not very intelligent, in fact they are blind with stupidity and truly incredible destructiveness.

So, whether Left, Right or Center, I conclude that the human animal itself is appallingly short-sighted, totally myopic and backwardly greedy. I will never understand the plundering and pillaging, all in the name filthy lucre and amassing ultimately quite useless possessions; Nor will I ever understand the dizzying, witless and sightless greed that these beasts possess. It is NEVER enough for the likes of these creatures.

This obscene greed, along with the routine pathological lying; the cheating, stealing, thieving, all with the most astonishing impunity, it will all come back onto them and they are clueless. And it seems that, here in America, blatant and shameless hypocrisy is the norm; Standard behavior. It is with almost EVERY SINGLE politician, and the top echelons of the corporations that have bought them, and the lobbyists for those (corporate) interests.

Further, there are no boundaries at all with the likes of these people, to wit , MTT ROMNEY. They do not even live among any of us; and they truly do not care at all. About any one or anything but themselves, their own self interests and mind-boggling covetousness. They are either total Narcissists or pure sociopaths.

These Primates, humans, act very much like any bratty, spoiled, self-indulgent two year-old child who has never been taught to share; And these people are not only totally unenlightened and entirely undeveloped in the brain, but they are really not all that, well, BRIGHT. They have utterly no CLASS either.

As these dumb animals thoroughly and shamelessly ruin everything on earth, including the earth itself; and as they blindly destroy everything in sight including their VERY OWN SPECIES, I cannot help but conclude that these Idiot-Apes are indeed true sociopathic pathological liars.

Just throw a ton of money at the filthy white trash and watch the show. A bunch of Idiot-Celebrity-Thugs, Neanderthals. WHY IS IT that they all want so desperately to be on television??? OR, HA!, RUN FOR PRESIDENT??? Who ARE these people??? THAT is what is left of America.

Bravo, Christopher Marlowe, sorry, Christina Marlowe.
Christopher was executed by the order of Privy Council,
even if propaganda machine of his time was telling
us about some squabble in the pub, during a
drinking binge…

I do salute the person using this penname.
So, bravo, Christina. Your emotional expose is just on
target, factual, right…

I do salute The Economist too, because this is a proof
of a free speech in motion.
Christina like a bare breasted Marianne is in a fighting
mood. Rightly so.

We the people, the intelligent species, allowed this
fantastic malfeasance by the corporatist system to happen.
We, you and I, should be blamed for allowing crooks
to robe us of fruits of our work and pretend that nothing
happened. The monster of corporatist system ( an anti-
thesis of good capitalism) is with us. We are being stupid
en mass for allowing this to happen.

The leveraged buyout artist for President! What a
preposterous arrogance and lack of ethics. This is the end
of human enlightenment, the end of reason…

Yes, we need a few million Christinas to change this
abhorrent status quo. Can we really do it?!
Please read Chris Hedges…

You have just described - class warfare - socialism and the inability of those that can't understand their plight in life so they choose to vilify those who have attained any measure of success - and attribute their miserable lifes to the doing of others - with no responsibility for their own inactions - truly an Obama(nation) of the first order- that they are incompetent - and convinced all the "white trash" to believe that they are owed a better life and that 50 years of a welfare state - boatloads of money towards an education system that in the name of political correctness has dumbed down 2 entire generations through mainstreaming and placed the US at #23 for competencies in education - what I hear is so totally racist and based on envy and jealousy from you and your ilk. You choose to forget who started the myriad of affirmative action programs - those white trash in the USA - while Eurabia burns from its multi-culturism. You represent the neer do wells who suck the system dry with your constant cries for entitlments. GET A LIFE

You put me on the spot with your question! :) Seriously, if I have an issue with this person, I would take it up with her directly. I generally do that. It seems unfair to make another person a topic behind the person's back. I suppose as November draws nearer, there will be more and more comments of a "vehement" nature.

Please, accept my apologies. I had no intention of putting you on the spot, at all. I should have realized that, my post was doing just that: putting you on the spot. The intention was to get a general classification for someone like the poster mentioned. Really. I surmise her comment was a wee bit more than merely "vehement". Anyway, it was my faux-pas.

I have read many comments and posts in favor and against both candidates for the presidency of the United States some a bit strong but I dare say non in the form of such a virulent and vehement personal attack. Do you know the Romney family personally or any of those people that you propose should be taxed at 100%? and if so have they done something so horrible to you that merits the inclusion of physical violence? I understand that this is a forum for debates not for the slaughter of personalities or a specific class of our society, I do believe that you can voice your opinion in a more moderate manner for the benefit of the less “emotional” if you will and try a bit not to fall below Mr. Romney's somewhat reprehensible attitude on his resent visit to England but to his credit he is not a dumb animal as you describe, perhaps just an American “Nouveau Riche” with a bit to learn about courtesy and manners as is to be expected of many of them but you do no only execute Mr. Romney's character in your post but a whole class of people whom you do not know and that greatly contribute to all government programs, let me rephrase this, practically pay for all of them it does not matter if it is a fraction of their money or a lot, this is a fact which your are ignoring in your rather poisonous descriptions. May I remind you that it is not corporations that “suck” at people they merely employ them it is government that illegally drain the pockets of their citizens (read you own constitution) allow me to point out that there are many “good human beings” in all social classes, perhaps some greedy rich and also many poor people who are ungrateful, ill intended and envious of others success which are the ugliest kind, you are also wrong in stating that wealthy people do not care or that they are oblivious to the problems of our society, our environment and Etc. I doubt that you may know any of those people but I will inform you that I travel extensively and in my experience it is not the people who ruin the earth it is the governments of those countries who also tax their people and corporations and do nothing about it (mainly in socialist countries) If you reside in the U.S.A. Then your complaint about this is less than valid and I have no reason to be a “blatant and shameless hypocrite” I will not divulge what class I belong to but I certainly do not represent a manufacturing or a large corporation. Before I finish I would like to ask another question; what makes YOU think that any of the rich and wealthy will tolerate to be taxed at 100% or 75% or even 50%? and much less that someone should slap them on the mouth? Who is going to try do this deed, perhaps you madame Marlowe? I use my real name, I do not know if Marlowe is yours but if you are using it as a pen name in honor of Mosieur Christopher Marlowe let me take this opportunity to remind you of his reputation, not as a writer but as a rake-hell among other nasty atributes, but maybe this is why you chose this name. As a friend I urge you to take a good look at your life, at yourself, your accomplishments etc. before you verbally charge against a person or persons in such a hysterical manner, spewing this hatred that you personally may feel for reasons unknown to other readers in a public forum.