I figured this would be an interesting thread. Who all thinks the moon landing was faked? I think it may have been! I've done some research and I think that it was faked in a Hollywood studio! What are your guy's opinions?

No. The lunar landings weren't faked. If you look through a strong enough telescope and you can see the rover, tracks, and the parts of the lander that it leaves when it launches off the moon. Theres also the fact that there was a U.S. Navy battlegroup surrounding the splashdown area to retrieve the capsule. You just cant get that many guys to keep quiet about something that huge. It would have pissed most of them off to see it was bullshit.

I think the moon landing in 1969 was faked. A year before that, technology wasn't anywhere near being advanced enough to get a human to space and then we were at "war" with Russia and BAM we land on the moon.

It seems as if maybe, JUST MAYBE, we faked the Apollo 11 moon landing in 1969. I think we did get a man on the moon at a later date but I think that the Apollo 11 manned landing was faked so that we could '1 up' Russia.

DeviantBMX123 wrote: we watched a mythbusters proving every theory wrong in science class.... Besides what about apollo 13? you really think they maqde it seem like people were gonna die just for the fun of it?

Sorry, I made a loose statement in the title. I think the FIRST manned moon landing was faked.

DeviantBMX123 wrote: we watched a mythbusters proving every theory wrong in science class.... Besides what about apollo 13? you really think they maqde it seem like people were gonna die just for the fun of it?

We had difficulties just taking off during attempts in years before 1969, then we get involved in the "Space Race" and we somehow have a successful manned space mission? I don't know. It just seems very unlikely that it could have happened the way that it supposedly happened.

I didn't make this thread to try and say "I'm right and you're wrong." I made it so that we could all share opinions and ideas. I believe that I could be wrong and the US, somehow, pulled off the mission in 1969 but I am like 60-70% sure that it was a hoax and we didn't actually get to the moon until later missions.

Just take a look at it guys, some of it seems kinda out there to me even. 7, 6, and 5 to be exact. BUT, reasons 1, 2, 3, 8, and 9 really jump out at me. Like whoa!! Who knows though man. It would be difficult for so many people to keep their mouths shut and not give any evidence away leading to many more people thinking it was faked. You'd think that after all these years, someone involved would have said something that would have lead us to think that it was faked. I get that. I just think that it would be EXTREMELY difficult for the US to plan and execute a successful manned space mission when a year before, there was almost no chance that we could have gotten a man to the moon!

T-rider wrote: Well, i know for sure that there has been some real landing. Not sure about the usa landing. I think the flag was moving in a video?

Yeah. That's a thing that many people know. NASA did have a rod through the flag so that it would stay up and not droop down but it does move a bit in the video. I think there's more significant evidence that it was faked though.

Technology Wasn't as primitive as you may think back then. The prototype of the SR-71 was made in the mid 50's. The more realistic "conspiracy theory is the crash landing at Roswell in 47. There have been several people who were there that came forward when they were getting ready to croak, ssying they and their families were threatened if they breathed a word about it. Then, in the years following, technology advanced in leaps and bounds. Reverse engineering at its finest. The engine in the SR-71 is one of the most advances turbine engines ever built, yet were supposed to swallow the load of bullshit that it was created back in the late 40's/early 50's? And since the SR-71's have been retired, we're supposed to believe it has no replacement, just the satellites. Theres a small part on "An alien history of planet earth" that touches on what replaced it. Its just too fast to be caught on camera. I have to go get this bike shipped, ill post the link later, unless someone beats me to it.

Just take a look at it guys, some of it seems kinda out there to me even. 7, 6, and 5 to be exact. BUT, reasons 1, 2, 3, 8, and 9 really jump out at me. Like whoa!! Who knows though man. It would be difficult for so many people to keep their mouths shut and not give any evidence away leading to many more people thinking it was faked. You'd think that after all these years, someone involved would have said something that would have lead us to think that it was faked. I get that. I just think that it would be EXTREMELY difficult for the US to plan and execute a successful manned space mission when a year before, there was almost no chance that we could have gotten a man to the moon!

Chuck8273 wrote: Technology Wasn't as primitive as you may think back then. The prototype of the SR-71 was made in the mid 50's. The more realistic "conspiracy theory is the crash landing at Roswell in 47. There have been several people who were there that came forward when they were getting ready to croak, ssying they and their families were threatened if they breathed a word about it. Then, in the years following, technology advanced in leaps and bounds. Reverse engineering at its finest. The engine in the SR-71 is one of the most advances turbine engines ever built, yet were supposed to swallow the load of bullshit that it was created back in the late 40's/early 50's? And since the SR-71's have been retired, we're supposed to believe it has no replacement, just the satellites. Theres a small part on "An alien history of planet earth" that touches on what replaced it. Its just too fast to be caught on camera. I have to go get this bike shipped, ill post the link later, unless someone beats me to it.

There is a replacement. Have you heard of the Aurora? Crazy thing. There was a jet scramble here at NAS fallon and a ufo perfectly matching this aircraft's description was found. And all personnel involved were forced to keep shut. A jet crashed same night. The top secret aurora spy plane

Just take a look at it guys, some of it seems kinda out there to me even. 7, 6, and 5 to be exact. BUT, reasons 1, 2, 3, 8, and 9 really jump out at me. Like whoa!! Who knows though man. It would be difficult for so many people to keep their mouths shut and not give any evidence away leading to many more people thinking it was faked. You'd think that after all these years, someone involved would have said something that would have lead us to think that it was faked. I get that. I just think that it would be EXTREMELY difficult for the US to plan and execute a successful manned space mission when a year before, there was almost no chance that we could have gotten a man to the moon!

I'm reading Chris Hadfields book , I guess he's a fake? And his live streamed "Major Tom" song from the space station was a hoax?

Damn man calm down, I just made the thread to express some opinions and throw in my 2 cents. Nothing worth getting so angry over. I don't want to make another online fight like the one that occurred last time someone made a religion thread on here.

Stocksy wrote: Damn man calm down, I just made the thread to express some opinions and throw in my 2 cents. Nothing worth getting so angry over. I don't want to make another online fight like the one that occurred last time someone made a religion thread on here.

biggybuggy wrote: There is a replacement. Have you heard of the Aurora? Crazy thing. There was a jet scramble here at NAS fallon and a ufo perfectly matching this aircraft's description was found. And all personnel involved were forced to keep shut. A jet crashed same night. The top secret aurora spy plane

blaaaaaaaaa wrote: We have so many sattelites an space that let us do things like use cellphones. Why would we fake a moon landing if we can get things like that up there?

Huge difference between sending up satellites and landing a man on the moon

Soon you kiddies will learn that all conspiracy theorists are fucking morons.

now, as far as "super secret" shit...yeah...tons of it...i'm prior military with a super secret security clearance and even i wasn't allowed to know jack about anything remotely classified when i was in the military, there's shit the U.S. government has that we won't see for another 20 to 30 years.