concorde and 9-11

Материал готовится, пожалуйста, возвращайтесь позднее

How do you think the United States Government would react if a major foreign power launched a crippling attack on the American and Canadian economies, then within a single decade tried to destroy Boeing Aircraft Corporation, blow up Air Force One, and assassinate the American President? Do you believe the United States Government would simply accept this as “fate”, or do you believe it would instruct its intelligence agencies to launch a devastating counter-strike, aimed at proportionately punishing the aggressors without running the risk of an intercontinental thermonuclear exchange? This report on 9-11 is not intended to undermine those who have taken rigid inflexible positions on events at the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Instead, it has been prepared for the tens of thousands of disenfranchised people who are not willing to believe the official line that “Osama Bin Laden did it”, and who are equally unwilling to believe the tempting Internet alternatives. Most of the disenfranchised believe there was a lot more to this attack than Muslims trying to kill Christians, or a Republican Administration trying to enslave the American people. The disenfranchised are correct. Whoever the motivated first-world attackers were, they used state-of-the-art technology on their primary target, in fields as diverse as military stealth, aircraft avionics, pyrotechnics, and precision demolition. With the methods and means at their disposal, the attackers could easily have wiped out half of New York and Washington that sunny September morning, but chose not to do so. The World Trade Center was their only primary target, a potent symbol representing America’s economic rape and pillage of the world for the last fifty years. In military terms the World Trade Center operation was a brilliant success, with not a single brick left standing, followed shortly thereafter by a limited strike on the Pentagon. Although this second strike pointed directly at the armed enforcers of America’s overseas economic rape and pillage, it wasted no heavyweight tactical assets. The Pentagon was a reinforced “hard target” against which the planners threw a single relatively lightweight Boeing 757, with no serious intent of target destruction. To find those really responsible for 9-11, we need to take a brief but fascinating trip through history, starting in 1989 when kindly democratic New York bankers “liberated” the people of Russia from the “horrors” of communism. Nobody asked the Russians if they actually wanted to be liberated, and nobody in New York gave a damn when Russian old age pensions vanished completely, or when members of the Russian Military were driven from relative wealth to the very brink of poverty and despair. To make things worse, the premeditated New York attack on Russia was also intended to destabilise Germany; which at that time was the unchallenged economic powerhouse of Europe. Within weeks of the “collapse” of communism, the American media hyped up the need for the Berlin Wall to be taken down, allowing East Germans to be reunited with those in the west. This was an apparently noble gesture, but nobody in New York asked the Germans if they actually wanted to be reunited, nor if they were willing to become the economic basket case of Europe, when economically powerful West Germany was forced to absorb penniless and backward East Germany.