Will The Co-operative Group throw Funeralcare to the wolves?

On 2 July this year the Co-operative Group’s executive team visited Rochdale. The chief exec, Euan Sutherland, tweeted: “Spent the day at Rochdale Pioneers Museum with the Exec immersing ourselves in Co-operative heritage. Fantastic, inspirational, relevant”.

All very heartening if you’re one of those who inclines to the view that capitalism is essentially sociopathic, and that therein lie the seeds of its destruction.

Disillusionment with capitalism does not in itself boost the credentials of co-operation. The history of consumer co-operatives is not especially glorious. They tend to start well then lose their way, demutualise, play copy-fatcat.

The history of worker co-operatives shines more brightly — as John Lewis and Waitrose testify.

Ethical values in themselves are no determinants of commercial fertility. The history of ethical values demonstrates that, actually, they are best exemplified by those people who renounce material things. Had Gandhi been driven everywhere in a Rolls Royce and dressed in a Prada suit, the story of Indian independence would read otherwise.

For this reason, the words ‘ethical business’, attractive as they are, have something of the flavour of an oxymoron.

But this is what The Co-operative Group claims to be, ethical, never more stridently than in recent weeks from amidst the twisted wreckage of its wretched bank. It is now 70 per cent owned by its creditors, including a bunch of American hedge funds. Rather than die of shame it instead proclaims new life: “By continuing to have regard for the highest standards of ethical principles we are more committed than ever to ensuring the Co-operative Bank remains just as special for years to come.”

Ethical schmethical. The bank has lost the title to call itself a co-operative in the sense of a jointly owned and democratically controlled enterprise. To call itself co-operative is now patently misleading and is rightly being legally challenged.

Where did it all go wrong for The Co-operative Group (as opposed to co-operative values)? The Daily Telegraph reports ceo Euan Sutherland conceding with refreshing honesty that “the organisation has lost it way, and, referencing the founding Rochdale Pioneers, that its recent controversial history was not what the organisation was set up for.” You can easily see the shades of the Pioneers nodding in sorrowful assent.

Whether or not, fuelled by the Rochdale Principles, The Co-op can in the future succeed in its core mission of enabling working people to buy those things that they would otherwise be unable to afford we shall have to wait and see. We simply note that, at a time when there is increasing anxiety about funeral poverty, Co-operative Funeralcare has offered no lead and generated no initiatives. Nothing.

The Pioneers surely would have.

Having said all of which, it may already be too late to lose any more sleep over the way Funeralcare has fallen short of — betrayed, some would say — its ethical values. Because it’s beginning to look as if, in order to bring the Group back into profitability, The Co-operative Group may be about to shed its funerals operation and throw it to the capitalists. The same Telegraph article tells us:

Mr Sutherland, who took control of the mutual from May 1, said that in order to reduce the current £1.3bn bank debt, it must look to productivity, efficiency, and selling some of its assets. Divisions which will not be sold include its food retail business and its pharmacy business, it is understood. Non-core arms are thought to include the funeral business and its security business, but Mr Sutherland would not comment further.

Given the deep loathing with which the top chaps at Funeralcare regard the GFG (good morning, Mr Tinning), we can forgive you for supposing that we’d celebrate this with a day at the races. But we emphatically wouldn’t. First, our politics here are pink. Second, we’d deplore the impact of this on the many excellent people in Funeralcare, especially on the shop floor (not the management). When Sutherland talks of productivity and efficiency, he’s using the language of the time and motion man. We can only imagine the effect that ‘efficiencies’ are having on good men and women right now.

Third, we regard the funerals business as pre-eminently suited to a social enterprise business model. We’d like to see Funeralcare given another chance to get it right and be what it says on its tin.

The Sunday Times has been told by Sutherland that “every private equity group in Europe” wants to buy Funeralcare, but that he is not minded to sell.

Time will tell. The man needs to find £500 million fast. If he’s minded to sell, let him talk to an excellent worker’s co-operative that we’ve long thought would make a very good fist of it. Tune in, please, John Lewis.

but when ones profits are garnetum, then these ‘aims and goals’ can clearly be achieved

what I want to see is cheaper funerals, at the coal face, pse?

andrew

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

5 years ago

Guest

andrew plume

Would I wish to see the Co-op Group sell Funeralcare? Yes, unreservedly, absolutely no question at all. My main concern is quite simple. With the price expected, it will take an enormous amount of ‘vulture capital finance’. If this meant that the already excessively large bill to your average punter for instructing F’care significantly increases, then I would be very uncomfortable. Charles has quite rightly flagged the issue of “funeral poverty”. F’care have done absolutely nil to address this issue, they have instead constantly driven up their prices and then there is their policy of ‘credit checking’ new clients, which… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

5 years ago

Guest

Rosie

Hi Andrew

Let’s not forget that they are forging forward, acquiring and headhunting natural burial sites. They have taken over 4 stand alone sites and are including “woodland” burial areas in most of their new crem’ planning applications. Green and attractive fellows.

I think I would welcome a private equity owned funeralcare! The existing business, the one making £60 million in annual profit despite this being the worst recession the UK has ever known, is no longer what people think it is. It certainly doesn’t seem to serve the poorest very well? A fresh new funeralcare, owned by ruthless venture capitalists would be a far more honest and transparent business model for us to compete with. I am glad the name ‘cooperative bank’ is being challenged legally. The public will usually believe anything when there is no visual change to a business.… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

5 years ago

Guest

Jonathan

“Funerulaonecare”. It sounds the pits to me.

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

5 years ago

Guest

Jonathan

…sorry, I forgot we’re upside down now – that won’t make much sense till you’ve read RR’s comment.

(Postscript: Is there some way of inverting the comments section so you can read it without confusion?)

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

5 years ago

Guest

Kitty

Jonathan asked: Is there some way of inverting the comments section so you can read it without confusion?
No. As in life, you have to start at the bottom and then try and work your way up.

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

5 years ago

Guest

Kitty

Unless you reply to a reply.

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

5 years ago

Guest

Jonathan

But then it’s all even more out of sequence, Kitty!

Vote Up0Vote Down Reply

5 years ago

Guest

Kitty

Yes J. Especially when the Reply button mysteriously disappears and I’ve now had to reply to my reply. Is there a reply quota?

Modern mutuals are libertarian, not socialist, as they’re member-owned limited companies, neither public-owned, nor state-owned. The oh-so middle class John Lewis Partnership is a shining beacon of quality product and service delivered by motivated employees who share profits. So much so that politicians and economists are looking to it as a model for making councils, health services and schools more independent of the state and taxpayer. When a mutual such as the Co-operative Group goes toxic (its bank arm needs to plug a shortfall of £1.5bn), it must do what any company run on capitalist lines must do: modernise and… Read more »

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

You can adjust all of your cookie settings by navigating the tabs on the left hand side.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

This website also uses cookies that can’t be disabled through this tab and will need to be disabled manually. The blog itself uses a commenting system by wpDiscuz which uses a cookie to remember some of the information you put in to save you inputting it every time. It also helps prevent comment spam.

The blog may also feature embedded items such as youtube videos which can set cookies to identify your device and approximate location to optimize bandwith and tailor ads as handled by google.

Our Directory also sets some cookies for the Map to function based on your selection and preferences.

Unfortunately the scripts for these features cannot be placed here for you to disallow the cookies manually, therefore the button on this tab will have no affect.

However if you wish to disable these cookie, you will need to disallow them manually in your browser.