Friday, October 14, 2016

I haven't seen so many women come forward in such a short period of time to condemn an alleged sexual predator since Bill Cosby' s accusers started coming forward to tell their stories. Apparently Donald's little fingers have been very busy. Dude was not kidding when he did the whole locker room "banter" thing with Billy Bush. (Memo to trump people: If your guy himself says that he does these things, it's a pretty safe bet to assume that he did actually do these things.)
Donald, of course, says that all of these accusations are false, and he trotted out a witness who he alleges was present at the scene of one of his encounters. But, as is always the case with poor Donald these days, there were some issues.

TheDonald Trump campaign has finally produced evidence to supposedly refute one of the harassment claims against him. The only problem is the first thing that comes up when you Google this guy.

Jessica Leedsclaimed toThe New York Timesthat Trump groped her on an airplane decades ago, but the Trump camp has provided Anthony Gilberthorpeas their character witness to say this didn’t happen.

He explained, “I have only met this accuser once and frankly cannot imagine why she is seeking to make out that Trump made sexual advances on her. Not only did he not do so (and I was present at all times) but it was she that was the one being flirtatious.”

But, see, there’s that pesky little thing that comes up when you Google Gilberthorpe.

Former Conservative activist Anthony Gilberthorpe said he told Margaret Thatcher 25 years ago about what he had witnessed and gave her names of those involved.

His allegations that he saw top Tories having sex with boys comes after David Cameron launched a Government inquiry into claims of a cover-up.

Anthony, 52, said: “I am prepared to speak to the inquiry. I believe I am a key witness.”

Ok, let's scratch Anthony off the list of credible witnesses for trump.

So, on the subject of the racist nutjobs Trump has stirred up, the following three fellows didn't even wait for Trump to lose the election before planning their acts of violence.

They are members of a racist militia (aka terrorist group) in Kansas, and the FBI says they were planning on blowing up an apartment complex full of Somali immigrants on the day after the election. Somalis are black AND Muslim, so attacking them would have been double racist points, I guess.

Where were these women when they had a chance to throw the Republican nomination to El Jeb, or even Cruz?

The American public understands now that the Demonrat party is dirty, the Clintons are dirtier, and the major media are all in the tank for them. America now understands what the Germans mean by "lügenpreße". The more the Demonrats and media attack, the angrier they get, and the more Trump's poll numbers go up.

“And when you’re a star they let you do it,” Trump says....“Grab them by the pussy,” Trump says. “You can do anything.”

The funny thing about the ginned up outrage is that it's a true statement. The wealthy elite have carte blanche with their camp followers.

A theory I just thought of and will share. Trump is from the class of people who pay bribes, Hillary from the variety who receive bribes. Perhaps you can tell something about their followers from that fact.

Unbelievable. You know, as well as I do, white wimmens will suck a pecker all day long to get their picture posed with rich white men.

(So would black wimmen, but they know black guys with money go for the blonde whites....Why? Heck, I don't know. I always heard it was all pink on the inside) So, why do so many hoocies want to color their hair blonde?

I seriously doubt that, but I'd LOVE too see YOU make sure I go the way of uptownsteve. And my response to that besides my marital military "connections", is to let you know that I live in an open carry state, so that from that what you will. Or don't 'cause I don't really give a damn.

But here's the thing sport. I'll be posting here until Field decides to no longer have a blog, so print your veiled threats and wipe you big funky ass with it. Then lick/suck on it for fun.

I seriously doubt that, but I'd LOVE too see YOU make sure I go the way of uptownsteve. And my response to that besides my marital military "connections", is to let you know that I live in an open carry state, so that from that what you will. Or don't 'cause I don't really give a damn.

But here's the thing sport. I'll be posting here until Field decides to no longer have a blog, so print your veiled threats and wipe you big funky ass with it. Then lick/suck on it for fun.

"I seriously doubt that, but I'd LOVE too see YOU make sure I go the way of uptownsteve. And my response to that besides my marital military "connections", is to let you know that I live in an open carry state, so that from that what you will. Or don't 'cause I don't really give a damn."

OK. So, you are threatening me with the usage of firearms? Your "connections" as to have been familiar with weapons for forty-five years? A Texas Trophy hunter?

"Spell checking is an achievement to those who think spelling correctly on blog is an academic award winning endeavor."

How like a google to mistake form for substance. Spelling correctly, everywhere, is part and parcel of communicating clearly. It's not done for awards, it's done so that one's meaning comes through with as little work and chance of misunderstanding as possible.

Having one's prescription misunderstood can kill a patient. That one comment of yours should disqualify you from a career in medicine. But... our benevolent overlords have decided that a large uptick in iatrogenic deaths is acceptable in the pursuit of "diversity".

@8:31, and yet you stay OBSESSED with me. How many comments about me on this thread, around 75% or so? I get that the mentally ill aren't capable of recognizing their own illness, but doesn't ANYONE in your life care enough about you to see that you get help?

Or do you keep the door locked to the basement so your mother won't disturb you and find just how much of a sick puppy you really are?

Shakespeare was born in 1564, which was almost a century before the Portuguese lost their near-monopoly on the trade in Black slaves. Most of the few Blacks in England even 200 years later were associated with ships plying the triangle trade. Last, he was born in Stratford-upon-Avon, where it is vanishingly unlikely that any Blacks were seen between Roman times and his birth, or for some time thereafter.

Why you believe such obviously insane things doesn't matter. What matters is that you do, and it ought to disqualify you for any kind of position requiring rational thought. That includes medicine.

TWEET ME

@fieldnegro

Follow the The Field Negro via e-mail.

DISCLAIMER

*COMMENTS, LINKS, AND CUT AND PASTE ARTICLES, ARE NOT ALL ENDORSED BY THE PUBLISHER.

THIS BLOG claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to its respectful owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

MORE DISCLAIMERS

***The views expressed on this site are the field's and the field's alone. They do not reflect the views of his employer, or any professional or legal organization with which he is affiliated.***

This is a commercial free blog.

Money is nice, but being able to speak my mind is better.

"Real talk: Daniel Rubin has a great little piece up wherein he chats with The Field Negro, the Philly-based blogger who sharply ponders all things black on a daily basis. (Seriously, if you’ve never checked in with TFN, you should: Its author, Wayne Bennett, is a fantastic read who can cut through bullshit like a hot knife through butter, which is a far grosser analogy than I wanted to make, but there you have it.)" ~Philebrity~

"One of the most precocious and hilarious Black political minds on the net. Ive been a long-time fan!" ~Asad Malik~

"..While most of what he writes is tongue-in-cheek, his space is a safe house for candid discussions about race, especially in the comments section, where people of all colors meet."~~Daniel Rubin, "The Philadelphia Inquirer"~~

"To white people, Bennett's musings are like kitchen-table talk from a kitchen they may otherwise never set foot in. To African Americans, he is part of a growing army of black Internet amateurs who have taken up the work once reserved for ministers and professional activists: the work of setting a black agenda, shaping black opinion and calling attention to the state of the nation's racial affairs."

~~Richard Fausset, "L.A. Times"~~~

"That's why I love the blog "Field Negro" so much. Field, as he's known to his fans, has the sense of reality that it takes to call out the (CowPuckey) of blame beating by those who are in positions of power and their lackeys. Because of his handle and his unabashed way of writing about racial issues, Field is often cited as a "Black blogger." What he is, however, is a first-class detector of blame deflection and an excellent student of history. If you want to write about the past and future of repression there's really no other perspective to take - which is why everyone should read Field."

"Half a century after Little Rock, the Montgomery bus boycott and the tumultuous dawn of the modern civil rights era, the new face of the movement is Facebook, MySpace and some 150 black blogs united in an Internet alliance they call theAfroSpear.

Older, familiar leaders such as Rev. Jesse Jackson, Rev. Al Sharpton and NAACP Chairman Julian Bond, are under challenge by a younger generation of bloggers known by such provocative screen names as Field Negro, thefreeslaveand African American Political Pundit. And many of the newest struggles are being waged online."~Howard Witt-The Chicago Tribune~

"I had no idea, for example, of the extent of the African-American blogging world out there and its collective powers of dissemination.But now, after reading thousands of anguished, thoughtful comments posted on these blogs reflecting on issues of persistent racial discrimination in the nation's schools and courtrooms, what's clear to me is that there's a new, "virtual" civil rights movement out there on the Internet that can reach more people in a few hours than all the protest marches, sit-ins and boycotts of the 1950s and 60s put together." ~Chicago Tribune Reporter, Howard Witt~