But, meet Andrew Keen. He is a ‘digital commentator.’
A few days ago he wrote a piece on the evils of mobile phones, and it’s just been festering and bothering.

I’ll SummarizeVia CNN, Keen quotes some futurist guy named Hammond:“He then warns us about a future in which virtual reality will
become so mobile that we will be able to wear it under our skin.“
The flaming retardation of that line alone, and it’s non-ironic inclusion in the piece, kinda sums up the comprehensive absurdity of Keen’s anti-mobile phone rant. It’s so obnoxiously misinform(ed?)ing and irresponsible – burns my eyes to read it.

Bad Press for Technology
See, my bother stems not from my technological utopianism butting up against the technological conservatism* of this piece, it’s really just that what he says is so knee-jerk ridiculous that it borders on satire – borders, but doesn’t cross. Instead it just smugly and blithely foments racism and calls for deploying the national guard. So to speak. Sorry – that’s not going to penetrate for all readers.

Anyway, a nuanced, carefully considered presentation on the nature of contemporary and future mobile communication and how it’s changed our lives (for better or worse) would have been an interesting read, even if the conclusion was still one of pessimism or caution. But it’s just, you know, not that at all. It’s an attack piece on a beautiful human technology.

Smells Geriatric
In the piece Keen figuratively details how mobile phones are a kind of creeping cancer on human communication, privacy, etc. And then literally, he repeats the scientifically inconclusive and oft-rebutted phones-could-give-us-actual-cancer line without even mentioning that for every independent study indicating a possible, only possible health risk, there’s another reporting that they’re simply benign. Perhaps that fact could at least, oh I don’t know, be mentioned somewhere near this particular scare tactic?

I thought shunning journalistic decorum was my thing.

Billions Communicating is a Very Good Thing
Read the piece, and you’ll see there’s not even a cursory mention of the countless benefits of mobile telecommunication. There’s nothing on the mobile phone-based technological leap-frogging that’s linking the previously unlinkable developing world with the sum-total of humanity’s digital knowledge. Nothing about mobile phones being used to coordinate protest and freely speak to the world and if needed deliver evidence of wrongdoing from the palm of one’s hand. And nothing about accelerometer-actuated alien invasion FPS games.
Nope.

Yeah, the Article is Bad.
So Why Care and Why Share?
We shouldn’t blindingly accept/embrace any technology, but we should at least consider both benefits and drawbacks before pouring out such negativity through the bullhorn of a global media giant like CNN. That’s what bugs. Of course CNN is as CNN does – they’re status quo medium and no one expects greatness there. But this seems kind of neglectful.

Keen is not trying to inform or educate, I think he just wants other people to agree with his personal fear of new technology through the contrived proxy of the mobile phone; he’s trying to whip up a mob (other technotards) to burn someone in the public square (mobile phones) because he finds it threatening to his worldview (the rotary dial was far enough, or I don’t get it, or it’s not what I want, or she’s a witch because sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Props to Arthur C.).

Or maybe, BIG maybe, he’s identified that most people do tend to be technologically conservative,* and that makes for a huge fan/consumer base, and if he can flick out the occasional nugget of dramatic techno-fear, well, people love to have their pre-held beliefs reinforced – so he’ll get madd paid. CNN’s maybe just running a 1000-word ad for Keen’s other products here.
Genius.

Either Way, Doesn’t Help
Whether it’s that he’s just not bringing his A-game to this article, or he’s milking an insidious manipulation of the walking dumb for profit (which honestly, does kinda appeal), the end result is a baseless, misinforming, and sensational soapbox rant that nudges the consuming laypeople toward fearing and distrusting technology rather than understanding, controlling, and using it to better our lives.

As a tool of satire or irony, I do love me some hyperbole.
As a cudgel of fear and ignorance, not so much.

*Conservative, Adj. A strong and often illogical aversion to change based on a fallacious idealization of the the past and irrational fear of losing one’s power and/or control. Often, but not always, accompanied by dumbness. Rel., ‘liberal,’ the pop-culture antonym with its own special wardrobe of idiocy.-Anthrobotic’s 2012 Dictionary of Useful Terms According to Reno

This RX-78-2 Gundam model is huge and imposing and badass, and while Anthrobotic does not necessarily endorse the consumption of anime, Anthrobotic endorses the shit outta visiting Tokyo Bay to get some 60-foot-tall robot in your life.

This week it’s the JTFFS talking about makeup and beauty products and the one thing Whitey’s got plenty of which is not a balanced diet or regular exercise or a positive residual self image, but skin tone! And then it gets sleepy weird…

This week we find out that Apple is likely to invest in Japan Display, the bastard child of Sony’s, Toshiba’s, and Hitachi’s floppy failed display businesses that, post-amputation, did a Wonder Triplets: ACTIVATE! move into profitability, and, entirely kinda unrelated, the de-displayed Hitachi has unveiled the world’s most powerful microscope and Sony’s commissioned it to look for their fiscal 2014 profit margin!

Next to Team SCHAFT’s new Google overlords withdrawing them from further competition, the poor showing of NASA’s Valkyrie robot might have seemed the DRC Trials’s biggest disappointment, but it’s nowhere near that simple: NASA JSC and the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC) are keeping the flame alive, and by flame we’re talking like…nuclear blow-torch.

This week we just kinda make fun of the Hollywood Reporter for not mentioning Transformers when they totally should and Epson is getting into the fashion printing business because they finally realized that nobody prints on paper anymore.

Talking about machine morality is basically picking apart whether or not we’ll someday have to be nice to self-aware machines or demand that they be nice to us. Impossible? No, stupid. Guaranteed? No, stupid. Good idea to be prepared just in case? Damn right.

This week Hitachi is finally ready to send its snake/crawler hybrid robot into the heart of Fukushima Daiichi’s severely melted-down reactor #1, and a Japanese booze maker that owns an American booze maker wants to get cozier and it’s kind of funny.

This week it appears that Kyocera is (allegedly) thriving in the UK printer market (paper, not 3D), and Toyota has decided that racin’ and jumpin’ and stuff is good for business after all. COME ONE AND ALL AND READ THE GODDAMN JTFF!

We want look to the future with hope, we long for new ideas and new developments, but that dream is stuck in neutral. We have no meaningful common rallying point. Collectively, the global zeitgeist’s most anticipated technological event is Tim Cook, 10:00am, PST. And holy shit is that sad.

SFGateMovies ask: Should we be afraid of artificial intelligence?SFGate“The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race,” some egghead told the BBC in December. That Stephen Hawking, what does he know? He's the guy who said that if extraterrestrials come to Earth, they might be here ... […]

Slate MagazineWe Need to Be Cautious About A.I. But That Does Not Mean You Should Fear It.Slate MagazineIn January, I joined Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk, Lord Martin Rees, and other artificial intelligence researchers, policymakers, and entrepreneurs in signing an open letter asking for a change in A.I. research priorities. The letter was the product of a ... […]

Financial TimesArtificial intelligence and the fridgeFinancial TimesAnd what happens when the artificial intelligence capabilities of appliances increases markedly and the fridge is capable of making more complex decisions? What if, rather than keeping the milk funds in the prepaid account, it connects to an online ...and more » […]

Guardian Liberty VoiceGoogle's artificial intelligence breakthrough may have huge impactThe Killeen Daily HeraldGoogle researchers have created an algorithm that has a human-like ability to learn, marking a significant breakthrough in the field of artificial intelligence. In a paper published in Nature this week, the researchers demonstrated that the al […]

ValueWalkBridgewater Is Said to Start Artificial-Intelligence TeamBloombergRay Dalio's $165 billion Bridgewater Associates will start a new, artificial-intelligence unit next month with about half a dozen people, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. The team will report to David Ferrucci, who joined Bridgewater ...As Bridgewater Rolls Out […]

Discover Magazine (blog)Google's Artificial Intelligence Masters Atari Video GamesDiscover Magazine (blog)Baidu, the “Chinese Google”, set up the Institute of Deep Learning and hired experts such as Stanford University professor Andrew Ng. Facebook has set up its Artificial Intelligence Research Lab which is led by another deep learning expert, Yann LeC […]

Business InsiderWho's set to make money from the coming artificial intelligence boom?Business InsiderAccording to a new report by Goldman Sachs, AI is defined as "any intelligence exhibited by machines or software." That can mean machines that learn and improve their operations over time, or that make sense of huge amounts of disparate data. T […]

CBS NewsHow artificial intelligence may change our livesCBS NewsBenedict Cumberbatch plays computer pioneer Alan Turing in the Oscar-nominated film "The Imitation Game." The "game" he speaks of has come to be known as the "Turing Test" for artificial intelligence, or A.I., which has long been a science-fiction staple. […]

Our Fear of Artificial IntelligenceMIT Technology Review (blog)Nick Bostrom, a philosopher who directs the Future of Humanity Institute at the University of Oxford, describes the following scenario in his book Superintelligence, which has prompted a great deal of debate about the future of artificial intelligence ... […]

Artificial intelligence: can scientists stop 'negative' outcomes?The GuardianWhat I don't like is when people say artificial intelligence is going to take over. As humanity gets smarter, we keep creating these dangers – like climate change, the global extinctions of biodiversity, nuclear weapons. But AI just makes us smarter ... […]