Syndicate

Britain: Why I resigned from the Green Party of England and Wales

Joseph Healy.

By Joseph Healy

April 2012 -- Red Pepper -- I joined the Green Party 10 years ago as I believed that it had
something new and radical to say in British politics. I was also a
founder member of Green Left,
which was formed in 2006, and I helped draft the Headcorn Declaration,
the group’s mission statement. One of my aims in doing so was to ensure
that there was a radical left faction in the party constantly pushing it
in a progressive direction -- and providing a counterbalance to those in
the party for whom pragmatism and "lifestyle environmentalism" were the
driving forces.

Many in the Green Party of England and Wales (GPEW) watched
the story of the Irish Greens with horror, but were also convinced that
it would never happen here, because the GPEW was one of the most left-wing Green parties in Europe.

But there was always a strong group at the centre of the Green
Party, and supported by many of its councillors, who regarded Green Left
as too left wing and whose vision was to replace the Liberal Democrats as the
main centre party. The entry of the Lib Dems into the Conservative Party-led British government in 2010
strengthened the hand of this group.

The battle lines became obvious over the issue of local
government budgets and cuts at the GPEW conference in spring 2011. At
that point the Greens had not yet taken control of Brighton council, but it was
clearly on the mind of the party leadership.

An amendment was put to an anti-cuts policy motion by Green Left
and some of the Young Greens. It called for local Greens councils to
fight the cuts and to defy the government by setting an illegal "needs
budget". Councillors were dragooned by the leadership to speak against
it and finally it was defeated by just three votes.

For many of us this was the writing on the wall and a sign that
should the Greens take Brighton, they would implement the cuts. It led
to a real fall in morale among many of us on the left of the party.

In May 2011, only three months after the conference, the Greens
took Brighton. Almost immediately the debate about the cuts budget
began. Green Left organised many internal discussions on the issue and
agreed to send a delegation to Brighton to argue the point with the
Brighton Greens councillors – this was only a few weeks before the budget
deadline.

For me it was too little and too late – although I supported the
initiative. I was pessimistic about the outcome and was proved right. I
drew parallels with the story of the Irish Greens and referred to this
in a speech I gave at a meeting of the London regional party in January.
I quoted the comments of the new Irish Green Party chair, Roderic
O’Gorman, following the defeat of the party in 2011 and the loss of all
its parliamentary seats: "We became part of the political consensus. Our
voters did not want us to be part of that consensus."

Painfully aware of the impact of any cuts budget in Brighton on
the national party’s reputation and on its relationship with the wider
anti-cuts movement, as well as the new political movements such as
Occupy, I supported a motion calling for a last-minute debate with a
Greens councillor from Brighton on the budget there. The motion fell and
the majority abstained, prepared to accept any decision reached by the
Brighton councillors.

It was now clear to me that the iceberg was fast approaching the
SS Green Brighton, with its consequent impact on the reputation of the
Green Party nationally. The collision happened when the cuts budget was
passed at the end of February. However, the budget passed was even worse
than predicted and was the Labour-Tory version, which the Greens
swallowed whole in order to remain in office.

A few days later at the party’s national conference, despite
vigorous objections from Green Left, the party voted to support the
Brighton decision. Pragmatism had defeated principle, realpolitik
triumphed over radicalism.

I resigned on the same day. I saw no indication that those of us
opposed to the decision would be able to remain radical opponents of
the cuts agenda while our own elected members had sold the pass. I was
always determined not to end up as a member of a small internal
opposition in a political party which had moved away from its core
principles, as happened in the Labour Party post-Blair. Some Green Left
members have remained in the party, while others have joined Socialist
Resistance or Respect. I have remained as an independent anti-cuts and
anti-war activist.

It is certainly true that it was not only the cuts agenda in
Brighton which led to my resignation, although that was the major issue.
I also found a lack of honesty and consistency in the way that those
leading the party were treating both its employees and its activists.
This came to a head in the autumn of last year at the party conference
in Sheffield. A highly respected and hard working party member, who held
the post of head of media relations, was treated appallingly by the
party leadership.

This included disciplinary action taken against him while he was
ill, no proper consultation with staff and members and a complete
ignoring the of the party’s radical policies on workers' rights and trade
union support – using the services of a human resources consultant to
undermine his position. As a trade unionist and campaigner for workers'
rights and social justice, I found it intolerable. Myself and other
members, many from the Green Party Trade Union Group and Green Left, put
a motion to the conference condemning the actions of the executive.
Every effort was made by the party leadership to force the motion off
the agenda. But despite their efforts, the motion was passed by a
significant majority and the executive censured.

This did not go down well with the party’s leadership. Comments
were made about the party’s activists and we were referred to in pretty
damning terms. The conference decision was also pretty much ignored and
the staff member in question was made redundant and forced to sign an
agreement (which I was advised was probably illegal) that he could not
stand for any office in the party for one year, so worried was the
leadership about his popularity and the possibility of him upsetting the
apple cart. All of this indicated a worrying hubris at the head of the
party and a willingness to ignore the concerns of activists and members.

I believe that the Brighton situation is further evidence of
this, with many at the head of the party arguing hysterically at the
recent conference for tribalist support for the councillors and
condemning criticism as disloyalty.

It does have to be said here that Greens MP Caroline Lucas did not support
the Brighton budgetary decision and said so openly at a fringe meeting
at the party conference. I am certain that this indicates her concern at
the apparent contradiction between her support for Occupy and calls for
a radical anti-cuts politics, and the decision of the council in her
own backyard.

When I resigned from the party, one prominent Green told me that
I had too many principles. The disconnect in modern British and
European politics is rather that there are too few principles. The real
battle now underway is whether we can give politics new life and new
meaning and to reconnect the millions in this country who no longer
vote, and have given up on electoral politics completely, with the
political process.

The Greens presented themselves as a party to the left of Labour
(not too difficult one would have thought). Its policies are radical
and many are worth supporting. But as with the situation in Ireland,
consistency and veracity are called for. It is not enough to parrot
truisms about being unable to challenge the status quo, no matter how
urgent it is to do so. How can Greens seriously challenge the
corporate sector, the global corporations, climate change in the Arctic
and the prospect of resource wars and famines, if they fall down at the
first puff of wind from Eric Pickles and the Department for Communities
and Local Government?

Vision requires courage, and courage requires mounting a challenge. On both, the Greens have been found sadly wanting.