Many who suffer from allergies (and who may be at risk of anaphylaxis) wear bracelets or medallions indicating their sensetivity, and details like medications to be administered.

However, although it's easy to spot an actual cat, dog, horse or peanut, it's not so easy to spot someone who has regular
contact with such items.

Thus, for the greater good, such individuals should wear Allergy Alert Bracelets. These bracelets not only show physically the type of allergen, but also include a passive transponder so that when someone with an allergy corresponding to their signature approaches within 3 to 5 metres, they receive a discreet alert.

Bracelets would be coded by appearance to be visible at a distance. For instance, dog owners would wear a gold bracelet with small gemstones which emits the odour of fresh bread. Ferret owners could have yellow bracelets that smell of bananas; bird owners would have purple bracelets that smell of lavender.

Cat owners would have bracelets that are a shitty brown colour, smell strongly of cat shit*, and intermittently broadcasts the noise of a cat vomiting a furball.

I know what you mean...last week I went into a small
store and I didn't notice the cats wandering around
the items until a few minutes had passed. It starts
with a sniffle, then sneezing. 10 minutes later I was
liberally washing my eyes and nose under running
water as I was becoming unable to do anything else.

Funny, in all the years owning cats, I've never once
had to clean
up one's shit. I just let them crap outside (which they
were
perfectly happy to do with absolutely no
encouragement). They
even thoughtfully buried it for me.

In the few years that I owned a dog, not only did I
have to smell
its shit repeatedly when attempting (with marginal
success) to
housebreak it, but had to actually pick it up and
dispose of it
myself. Not only that, but it seems like dogs always
smell likewell, if not shit exactly, then definitely
something unpleasant.
Never had a cat that smelled nearly as nasty.

I think that you are coming at this from the wrong point of view, from a psychological perspective at least. If we are, for the sake of the health of allergics, going to single out pet owners by making them smell funny, we will meet a certain amount of resistance and not a little Godwinning of online debate. As the issue is the general cluelessness of animal owners of the potentially disruptive nature of the cloud of dogbits that they bring with them. We need to address that cluelessness. Better then to exploit the already sensitive immune systems of the allergic and render their allergies more obvious: chameleonic skin response when certain immunological triggers are met might lead the allergic, who would at the same time be wheezy, teary and/or coughing, to turn an angry shade of purple, teal or tartan.

Well, being allergic to pandas isn't so bad.
They're rare already, so staying away from
zoos and oriental bamboo thickets should be
enough.

Mind you, [MB], that six metre square black
and white rug you've got in the Fourth Best
Second Floor Card Room in the Left-Hand
Annexe to the New South-East Wing (1723-
1727) might get some hard stares from the
CITES committee if you ever tried to export
it.

// You'll only encourage them //

As long as it encourages them to tattoo cat
owners on the forehead with feline
excrement, we don't consider it a problem.

//that six metre square black and white rug// It's
actually nearer to nine square metres, and it's not
so much a square as a Mercator projection. You
have no idea how much bamboo it takes to get a
panda to that size - almost lost a good gardener
over it.

We wasted quite a lot of time, because the staff
member who was entrusted with the panda had
been advised that getting it pregnant was the
most effective way to increase the available area
of ruggage. He wasted six months on that
project, and another six when he decided to get a
male panda to do the job instead. And nobody
had told him that a pregnant panda is barely 2%
bigger than a non-pregnant one. Still, got a very
nice loo-roll cover out of it, so mustn't grumble.

No, you don't. Why would you even joke about being
monstrously cruel to any living creatureespecially since
it's not even humorous? At least when [8th] continually
recycles the same old tired anti-feline barbs, they're
generally so outlandish as to be utterly ridiculous. Your
description sounds more like a boozed up hick bragging to
his beer buddies about what a tough guy he is. On top of
that, you're culturally ignorant to bootKoreans are
renowned for eating *dog*, and do not generally eat cat
meat.

//I've never once had to clean up one's shit. I just let them crap outside//

Well, this is what gets people so bloody excited. If owners were able to keep their cat in your own yard, that would be one thing. If owners could keep their cat from pissing all over their neighbour's stuff, and from walking all over their car, that would be another. Lastly, and very much more importantly, if owners were able to keep their cat from eating native birds and sall furry creatures, that would, in my mind, make the existence of the cat okay to begin with.

Generally speaking, with a lot of exceptions I'm sure, dogs can be expected to stay in their yard and not eat native animals.

The only reason I don't shoot cats in my yard is that it's illegal to do so. Sure as hell I shoot all of the feral ones I see out in the bush.