My daughter has never been is state care ... Everyone knows that ... So saying it proves what a liar you are ..

Simple as that!

eteponge told youthat we are different guyswith different ip

that prooves you lying again

For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)

Scepcop wrote:Ok I've just listened to all 7 tracks of the Randi sex tapes. And it does sound like his voice and speaking style all right. The tracks even show you professional calls that were made to Randi regarding his work, before the sex talks with the boys take place, to give it some more legitimacy.

But what I don't get is why these conversations were recorded and how they got into the publics' hands.

I'll say one thing though, most of the boys he talked to were 18 or over, it seems, so I guess most of these affairs were "legal". It only proves that he's gay and likes younger guys.

I've always wondered why Randi never got married. For some reason, this is like a taboo subject that's not even discussed on skeptic forums.

That's why I ask ...If you were randis significant other would you believe the police story?The kid says the cops are watching him and he doesn't want to get caught .... So it must be ilegal.

yeswe will never have any answers from youwhat was that paranormal claim you had??

For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)

Scepcop wrote:Ok I've just listened to all 7 tracks of the Randi sex tapes. And it does sound like his voice and speaking style all right. The tracks even show you professional calls that were made to Randi regarding his work, before the sex talks with the boys take place, to give it some more legitimacy.

But what I don't get is why these conversations were recorded and how they got into the publics' hands.

I'll say one thing though, most of the boys he talked to were 18 or over, it seems, so I guess most of these affairs were "legal". It only proves that he's gay and likes younger guys.

I've always wondered why Randi never got married. For some reason, this is like a taboo subject that's not even discussed on skeptic forums.

That's why I ask ...If you were randis significant other would you believe the police story?The kid says the cops are watching him and he doesn't want to get caught .... So it must be ilegal.

This is a great question that should be answered.

Why wont the JREF allow a discussion of this topic on their Critical Thinking forum?

Scepcop wrote:Ok I've just listened to all 7 tracks of the Randi sex tapes. And it does sound like his voice and speaking style all right. The tracks even show you professional calls that were made to Randi regarding his work, before the sex talks with the boys take place, to give it some more legitimacy.

But what I don't get is why these conversations were recorded and how they got into the publics' hands.

I'll say one thing though, most of the boys he talked to were 18 or over, it seems, so I guess most of these affairs were "legal". It only proves that he's gay and likes younger guys.

I've always wondered why Randi never got married. For some reason, this is like a taboo subject that's not even discussed on skeptic forums.

That's why I ask ...If you were randis significant other would you believe the police story?The kid says the cops are watching him and he doesn't want to get caught .... So it must be ilegal.

This is a great question that should be answered.

Why wont the JREF allow a discussion of this topic on their Critical Thinking forum?

Again I repeat what I asked before that dumb asses cant seem to get their stupid heads around. What business is it of anyone's? Other than Randi's or the other people involved at the time?Try answering that Professor in between visits to the asylum where your daughter stays. also read here http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=140879A discussion about the tapes. So another lie. Thread is still open.

My research into this reveals the tapes were most likely leaked by David Icke who in turn informed Craig Browning who in turn informed Callahan,who in turn informed Dave Koenig.But seeing as David Icke believes Royal family are lizards his reutaion isnt exactly good.

Professor you are wasting your time. Bigger(not literally that would be hard)people than you have tried to discredit Randi/JREF and failed in his skeptic career. As I said before sniggering liek a child about "sex with boys" on the internet is very immature. Go on national radio-sorry internet radio-and declare loud and clear "Randi abused boys" put it on YouTube(you were quick enough to do it about Dragoncon) or on your Myspace page. Maybe Callahan could feature it on his website.

Or maybe you are just a coward hiding behind a computer throwing allegations out hoping somehow, someone will take you seriously. Doesnt seem to be working.

I'm always very skeptical of any situation where someone's notability hinges on their connection to another notable person

Azrael wrote:Professor you are wasting your time. Bigger(not literally that would be hard)people than you have tried to discredit Randi/JREF and failed in his skeptic career. As I said before sniggering liek a child about "sex with boys" on the internet is very immature. Go on national radio-sorry internet radio-and declare loud and clear "Randi abused boys" put it on YouTube(you were quick enough to do it about Dragoncon) or on your Myspace page. Maybe Callahan could feature it on his website.

Or maybe you are just a coward hiding behind a computer throwing allegations out hoping somehow, someone will take you seriously. Doesnt seem to be working.

He hasn't done this yet because he knows he's wrong. You can always tell which beliefs he actually has some form of conviction in because (despite whether they're true or not...usually not) they're the ones that end up on YouTube. If Dave had any man bits, he'd stop crying for attention on an Internet forum and do as Azrael has suggested. Take his claims to the media, or publish a video on YouTube. C'mon Dave. Let's see what you've got.

Azrael wrote:Professor you are wasting your time. Bigger(not literally that would be hard)people than you have tried to discredit Randi/JREF and failed in his skeptic career. As I said before sniggering liek a child about "sex with boys" on the internet is very immature. Go on national radio-sorry internet radio-and declare loud and clear "Randi abused boys" put it on YouTube(you were quick enough to do it about Dragoncon) or on your Myspace page. Maybe Callahan could feature it on his website.

Or maybe you are just a coward hiding behind a computer throwing allegations out hoping somehow, someone will take you seriously. Doesnt seem to be working.

He hasn't done this yet because he knows he's wrong. You can always tell which beliefs he actually has some form of conviction in because (despite whether they're true or not...usually not) they're the ones that end up on YouTube. If Dave had any man bits, he'd stop crying for attention on an Internet forum and do as Azrael has suggested. Take his claims to the media, or publish a video on YouTube. C'mon Dave. Let's see what you've got.