Like most of Adobe's popular applications, Premiere Pro CC utilizes the GPU to enhance performance for a number of tasks but it is often more important to get the right CPU than it is to get a faster GPU. NVIDIA's new RTX series cards have general performance increases like you would expect, but much of what makes these cards interesting are the addition of two new features: Tensor cores and RT cores.

What are Tensor Cores?

While already available on the more expensive Titan V GPU, the RTX line introduces tensor cores at a more reasonable price point. These tensor cores operate alongside the normal CUDA cores that traditionally do the heavy lifting, but are designed specifically for machine learning inference (running already created and trained machine learning models). While not utilized in Adobe applications today, these cores may be used in the future - especially as Adobe continues to develop their "Adobe Sensei" AI and machine learning technology.

What are RT Cores?

RT cores are brand new in this generation of graphics cards, and are specialized for a single type of operation: ray tracing. It is possible that Adobe may utilize these cores in After Effects or even Photoshop to some extent, but we feel it is unlikely they will be used much in Premiere Pro.

What makes these new RTX cards hard to review and test is the fact that Premiere Pro currently does not use either of these new types of cores. We can (and will) look at straight performance gains with the current version of Premiere Pro, but really what you are paying for is technology that might give you significant performance gains in the future.

If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark result/analysis sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion section.

We want to give a shout out to Neil Purcell and Samuel Neff. They both sent us a sample clip to use in our testing to help us ensure that our testing is applicable to professional video editors and colorists. Thank You!

Rather than just timing a simple export and calling it a day, we decided to create six different timelines for each codec that represent a variety of different type of workloads. For each of these timelines we tested both Live Playback performance in the program monitor as well as exporting via AME with the "H.264 - High Quality 2160p 4K" and "DNxHR HQ UHD" (matching media FPS) presets.

Lumetri Color

Heavy Transitions

Heavy Effects

4 Track Picture in Picture

4 Track MultiCam

4 Track Heavy Trimming

Live Playback - Raw Benchmark Results

Live Playback - Benchmark Analysis

Often, whether the media we test is RED or not makes a big impact on performance since RED footage uses the GPU for the debayering of the RAW footage. Since this was a pretty big factor, we decided to look at the results depending on whether we were using RED media or non-RED media.

The "Live Playback Score" shown in the chart above is a representation of the average performance we saw with each processor for this test. In essence, a score of "80" would mean that on average that CPU was able to play our timelines at 80% of the tested media's FPS. A perfect score would be "100" which would mean that the system did not drop any frames even with the most difficult codecs and timelines.

Starting with the non-RED footage, all the GPUs we tested (including the new RTX cards) were close to identical. There is a slight difference when using RED media, but even then the RTX cards were only slightly faster than the current GTX cards. Between the RTX models, there was really no difference at all so getting a RTX 2080 Ti shouldn't give you any higher FPS for live playback than even the RTX 2070.

AME Export - Raw Benchmark Results

AME Export - Benchmark Analysis

Exporting through Adobe Media Encoder gives us a bit larger of a difference delta the cards we tested compared to Live Playback. Here we saw a small, but consistent, increase in performance with both RED and non-RED footage as you go up the NVIDIA GPU stack. None of the RTX cards quite catch up to the more expensive Titan V, but they all ended up being a tiny bit faster than the Titan Xp.

We are really talking about a ~5-10% difference in performance between the RTX 2080 Ti and the GTX 1070, however, so you likely won't notice a massive difference between any of the NVIDIA cards we tested unless you are doing exports that take several hours to complete.

Is the RTX 2070 good for Premiere Pro?

The new RTX cards are certainly not bad for Premiere Pro, but the difference between any mid/high end NVIDIA GPU is going to be very minor. However, this does make the RTX 2070 a solid choice as it performs just as well as the much more expensive models.

These new RTX cards may not be particularly exciting for Premiere Pro right now, but in many ways the real question is whether the RTX GPUs will be good for Premiere Pro in the future. The new tensor cores in particular could have significant performance advantages for some tasks, or they might never be used at all. It really comes down to whether or not the Premiere Pro developers are willing or able to make effectively use of these new features. Our guess is that they will eventually be leveraged in some way via Adobe Sensei, but whether it will happen in Premiere Pro CC 2020 or Premiere Pro CC 2030 is unknown at the moment.

Overall, the RTX 2070 in particular is a very solid choice for Premiere Pro as it easily keeps up with the more expensive RTX 2080 and 2080 Ti models. It isn't that much faster than the older GTX 1080 or GTX 1080 Ti, so it likely isn't worth a straight upgrade, but if you are already in the market for a new GPU it is likely going to be our most common recommendation.

There are really only a few reasons you might want to use one of the more expensive RTX cards for Premiere Pro. First, the RTX 2080 Ti has 11GB of VRAM which can be very important if you work with 8K media. Second, if you want to have NVLink support you will need to use either the RTX 2080 or 2080 Ti as the RTX 2070 does not support it. However, keep in mind that while Adobe may add support for NVLink in the future (which might allow things like memory pooling between multiple cards), it is currently completely unknown whether Adobe applications will ever be able to use it or how they will implement it.

If you are interested in how the RTX cards perform in other applications, be sure to check out our recent Video Card articles as we have (or are working on) a number of other articles for the RTX 2080 and RTX 2080 Ti.

From the testing I've done so far with CC 2019, it looks like we are getting about 8% higher performance in the new version of Premiere Pro. It doesn't look like any one thing in particular, just across the board improvement. That means that you can expect slightly better performance than what is shown in this article, but the relative difference between each GPU should be pretty much the same.

i'm building a my new pc for editing 1080p and at max 4k sequences. using 9900k and 64 gb 3200mhz ram with separate m2 drives for footage and cache. from this article and from current prices of gtx 1080 ti it really does look like the 2070 will give me the best results using premiere, but I can afford the rtx 2080 as well. is the rtx 2070 still the best option to go with? playback and exporting are the 2 most important aspects for me.

Don't go by Adobe's supported hardware lists pretty much. They are almost always missing the latest generation of hardware and are certainly nowhere near a full list of cards that will work well in Premiere Pro. For example, the only GTX 1000 series card they have on there is the 1080 Ti - the entire rest of that line is missing. They tend to "recommend" one of two things - workstation cards (Quadro/Radeon Pro) or the highest-end consumer card.

To be honest, that is one of the reasons why we do the amount of testing that we do. Sure, we want to know how fast the hardware is, but almost more importantly we need to know that it will work without any issues when we sell it to our customers. So if you see us recommending something or using it in our testing (without a note about it not working of course), you can be confident that it has passed at least our stringent testing process.

Posted on 2018-12-18 22:24:47

Tesla

Premiere is CRAP. That's why there is not much difference. Buggy, laggy sofware even on i7, 32GB RAM and 2080 RTX card.