Il 22/08/2013 14:43, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
> On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>
>>> NACK
>>
>> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
>> it can be me), don't you?
>
> going meta...
>
> What's this?
>
> All I know (... I think I know) about patch acceptance is that Anthony
> prefers to have at least one R-b. As far as I've seen this is not a hard
> requirement (for example, maintainers sometimes send unreviewed patches
> in a pull request, and on occasion they are merged).
>
> No words have been spent on NAKs yet (... since my subscription, that
> is). Is this stuff formalized somewhere?
>
> Sorry for wasting time...
No, it's not. But for example I NACKed removal of pvpanic from 1.6, it
was overridden, and I didn't complain too much.
Paolo