I’ve got work to do and ain’t got time to fix breakage for which no one is responsible.

For me it is not reproducable here on 6 different Antergos installations.
And as long as no one knows what is the reason for this, no one can sign responsible for it.

And i do not like the harsh tone also, but i do undestand that it is may caused by frustration.

And as @fernandomaroto on a rolling release system it can happen all the time that there are some breakage.

Responsibility here means to solve issues as fast as we can, and this is what both Archlinux and Antergos are doing, but they all need the community to provide logs and issues, and take responsibility too, in the name of community driven free software.

Well thanks for pointing out this “no liability” declaration, that’s the most ridiculous excuse for lacking Q/C (be it Arch or Antergos) I’ve ever read.

You’ll note, if you take the time to wade through the legalese, that both Microsoft and Apple take the same position. At least here you get a nice, polite, and honest answer and usually at least an attempt at a work-around. I don’t personally know about Apple, but with MS you get the royal run-around for an hour or so and a vague promise about a future update and get left feeling like someone forgot the Vaseline – and these people charge you a lot of your hard-earned money for it! Getting heavy-handed with them just gets you a dial tone, as well.

Antergos (or pretty much any Linux distro) is free and, oddly enough, much better supported – but you have to make an effort. No one on this board (or most of the various Linux boards) are getting paid for this and really don’t deserve your s***.

Is this how time normally passes? Reallly slowly… and in the proper order?