Buying or Selling IPv4 Addresses?

Watch this video to discover how ACCELR/8, a transformative trading platform developed by industry veterans Marc Lindsey and Janine Goodman, enables organizations to buy or sell IPv4 blocks as small as /20s.

Social and Digital Marketing are two of the fastest growing, and arguably the most important, pieces of branding today.

According to eMarketer, 2017 digital marketing expenditures will account for 38.4% of total ad spending and are projected to be almost 45% by 2020. This is double what they were just a few years ago and growth doesn't seem to be slowing down.

While this exponential shift in marketing has allowed companies like Airbnb, Uber and Dollar Shave Club to disrupt traditional markets seemingly overnight, the high demand for paid digital marketing inventory has also come with ever-increasing cost and challenges to traditional brands.

Not only can digital ad spending often feel like throwing money into a black hole, but the industry is still looking for sufficient accountability and standard measurements. From Proctor and Gamble's CMO putting the industry on notice at IAB's annual conference to Google opening up YouTube and ad platforms for a measurement audit, the good news is that a strong desire to create a better experience exists from all sides — publishers, advertisers and agencies.

This pursuit of a better experience is more important than ever, as brands and small businesses continue to encounter expensive obstacles (such as competition for their own keywords in search) and learning curves (with new channels such as programmatic native). Additionally, there is limited analytical data on the navigation of customers inside walled gardens such as Facebook and Instagram, which create a blind side of marketing that is hard to quantify and difficult to plan for.

Positive change will happen, but it will take time, and for many brands these measurement standards are not the only problem.

The Shift to Branded Property and Enhanced User Experience

As the internet grows, so does the responsibility of brand managers to keep control of their brand online. For some brands, this means investing heavily to own all of their digital landscape. For others, it's a focus on optimizing the user experience. Some will do both.

The signs of this shift are subtle for the moment, but are starting to show everywhere. For example:

Amazon recently announced the launch of a new video conferencing and work collaboration service on one of their branded extensions, Chime.aws.

Brands are opting to revert back to advertising their own URLs instead of hashtags or social handles. Marketing Land reported that hashtag usage in Super Bowl ads for Super Bowl LI dropped by almost 50% from just three years ago.

Over 400 brands now have delegated branded domain name extensions, such as Nike (.nike), Adidas (.adidas) and BMW (.bmw).

Barclays and Canon have (presumably) already invested millions to rebrand from .com.

Brands who realize the greatest future ROIs may be those that focus on branding every piece of their digital footprint and further focus on stronger user engagement measures, like the…

...Bounce-Back Rate (BBR)

The BBR is the percentage of people who visit your site, cannot find what they need, leave your site, go back to Google, search again and come back to your site.

Similarly, what percentage of your customers saw your recent TV commercial but thought that using Google was the best way to connect with the promotion or product you've just spent millions of dollars telling them about?

This is not a real measurement, nor is it likely trackable, but it should be something every brand considers. It's very different than the one-way bounce rate, and much more important.

It's also quite ironic, really. Brands spend money on people who manage search ads. They, in turn, spend money on search publishers, who then monetize search space for partners. Much of the entire digital marketing ecosystem comes down to search ads. Yet many brands never engage the power of site search to keep customers once they arrive.

Somewhere along the way, many brands forgot about enhancing their own user experience. Again, it's the ultimate irony: Brands spend millions on placing in search results every month, but often pay no attention to the search results on their own site.

Unfortunately, for many brands, job security and compensation are often based primarily on ROI performance for ads, and ad managers often fall into comfort zones simply measuring ad spend and sales. Website and UI development are often another department's responsibility. And therein lays the challenge. Somewhere along the way, many brands simply forgot about enhancing their own user experience.

A user's experience is often the single most successful path to profit.

Google and Amazon have dedicated teams building search, yet many brands place the responsibility of site search with IT. They couldn't be more wrong.

In fact, it's so obvious that it's painful at times.

For Example, a visit to the Barclay's home page will see the company has shifted to a branded .barclays domain name extension for a fully branded experience. A move which not only provides Barclay's much more brand control for marketing, but also for delegation of new domains and reducing the need for aftermarket domain name acquisitions.

However, the user experience needs work. For consumers who use the search box to search for "credit cards", outdated press releases from 2010 comprise the Top 3 results. No top result suggests applying for a credit card or even helps you understand what card options are available.

How about suggestions for related products?

Nope.

What will a customer do?

Many will go back to Google and search for credit cards, giving an opportunity for many competitors to grab their attention.

And Barclays is not the only one.

Let's try another key brand: General Motors.

A visit to GM.com is hopeful, but as soon as you start typing, you'll notice there is no suggestive search and you now have to think about what you're looking for. Say that you (finally) figure that out and want to search for "GMC Terrain" — the actual search results are reminiscent of a 1940's classified newspaper listing (not to mention the first two results are duplicates).

Viewing search results on many brand websites is almost like opening a version of the Yellow Pages — except before the Yellow Pages were yellow and before they were alphabetical and in groups. In fact, it's nothing like the Yellow Pages. The Yellow Pages seems like a futuristic space rocket compared to the way many brands treat their own site search.

Some brands do get it.

Home Depot and Lowes, for example, are incredibly refreshing sites to visit. They not only include suggested search (which should be mandatory for any consumer brand at this point), but also incorporate images into the results.

We not only live in a one-click world, but also in a world where people share things that look nice. And people leave sites when they can't find something, or go back to Google and search — giving your competitors a second chance to snag that customer you just spent money on.

Think about this again:

Brands spend millions to attract consumers. But then, when the consumer lands on the brand's page and cannot find quick answers to their questions, they literally leave the brand's site, go back to Google and are shown competitor's ads again. This is after you paid for the click, and already had them on your site. Can this Bounce-Back Rate (BBR) be measured?

Yep. That's how many brands operate today.

In fact, it gets even more obvious when you think about it.

How many of your own employees use Google to find stuff on your company site? Imagine how customers feel?

The future of branding may be branded extensions, however, if anyone is interested in ROI it might just be worth securing a team who understands the user experience before diving in.

If you are pressed for time ...

... this is for you. More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Vinton Cerf, Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Share your comments

Related

WHOIS access and development of an interim GDPR compliance model remains THE hot topic within the ICANN community. Developments are occurring at a break-neck pace, as ICANN and contracted parties push for an implementable solution ahead of the May 25, 2018 effective date of the GDPR... ICANN is now poised to formally publish the convergence model, although the community continues to discuss and seek a solution that is acceptable for all stakeholders. more

The European Commission recently released technical input on ICANN's proposed GDPR-compliant WHOIS models that underscores the GDPR's "Accuracy" principle - making clear that reasonable steps should be taken to ensure the accuracy of any personal data obtained for WHOIS databases and that ICANN should be sure to incorporate this requirement in whatever model it adopts. Contracted parties concerned with GDPR compliance should take note. more

There is an urgent need to clarify the GDPR's territorial scope. Of the many changes the GDPR will usher in this May, the expansion of EU privacy law's territorial scope is one of the most important. The GDPR provides for broad application of its provisions both within the EU and globally. But the fact that the GDPR has a broad territorial scope does not mean that every company, or all data processing activities, are subject to it. more

When you've been around the domain industry for as long as I have, you start to lose track of time. I was reminded late last year that the 6-year agreement Verisign struck with ICANN in 2012 to operate .com will be up for expiration in November of this year. Now, I don't for a second believe that .com will be operated by any other party, as Verisign's contract does give them the presumptive right of renewal. But what will be interesting to watch is what happens to Verisign's ability to increase the wholesale cost of .com names. more

Panels appointed to hear and decide disputes under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) have long recognized that three letter domains are valuable assets. How investors value their domains depends in part on market conditions. Ordinarily (and for good reason) Panels do not wade into pricing because it is not a factor on its own in determining bad faith. more

Cryptocurrencies (such as Bitcoin) are all the rage -- so, naturally, related domain name disputes are, too. The wild fluctuations in cryptocurrency prices (Bitcoin hit a low of close to $6,000 this week, after reaching an all-time high of more than $19,000 only two months ago, and less than $1,000 a year ago) have attracted speculators, regulators and now even cybersquatters. more

With GDPR coming into effect this May, it is almost a forgone conclusion that WHOIS as we know it today, will change. Without knowing the full details, how can companies begin to prepare? First and foremost, ensuring that brand protection, security and compliance departments are aware that a change to WHOIS access is on the horizon is an important first step. Just knowing that the ability to uncover domain ownership information is likely to change in the future will help to relieve some of the angst that is likely to occur. more

The defining of rights in the UDRP process is precisely what WIPO and ICANN contemplated, but it is unlikely they foresaw the destination of the jurisprudence. Since its inception, UDRP Panels have adjudicated over 75,000 disputes, some involving multiple domain names. (These numbers, incidentally, are a tiny fraction of the number of registered domain names in legacy and new top-level domains, which exceeded 320 million in the first quarter 2017). more

The way the Internet operates drove a wedge between strings of lexical and numeric characters used as marks and alphanumeric strings used as addresses. Domain names were described by Steve Forbes in a 2007 press release as virtual real estate. It is, he said, analogous to the market in real property: "Internet traffic and domains are the prime real estate of the 21st century." more

Unicode's goal, which it meets quite well, is that whatever text you want to represent in whatever language, dead or alive, Unicode can represent the characters or symbols it uses. Any computer with a set of Unicode typefaces and suitable layout software can display that text. In effect, Unicode is primarily a typesetting language. Over in the domain name system, we also use Unicode to represent non-ASCII identifiers. That turns out to be a problem because an identifier needs a unique form, something that doesn't matter for typesetting. more

Before the Internet, the sole competition for strings of characters employable as marks was other businesses vying to use the same strings for their own products and services. National registries solved this competition by allowing businesses in different channels of commerce to register the same strings but prohibiting competitors in the same industries from using identical or confusingly similar marks on the grounds that they were likely (at best) to create confusion and (at worst) to deceive the public. more

On January 24, 2018, ICANN's Business Constituency (BC) and Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC) co-hosted an event to discuss the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and its implications on access to the WHOIS database. ICANN's CEO and General Counsel joined the discussion, as did stakeholders from across the ICANN community. The event was timely and well attended with over 200 participants attending in-person or virtually. more

I am a student of life, learning one hard lesson at a time. In fact, I actually dropped out of my last year of college to start a tech company in a new space called the internet. I was an entrepreneur running an online service prior to the advent of the world wide web in 1992, back when Pine, Usenet, and Gopher ruled the information superhighway. Over the last 25 years, I have learned a great deal about technology adoption cycles by launching six internet companies, each at the forefront of a new technology wave. more

The Trademark Act of 1946 defines trademarks and service marks to include "any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof." Marks composed of lexical and numeric elements (as opposed to images) also can be described as strings of characters. Before the Internet there was no commercial use of such strings other than as marks, but the functionality of the Internet depends on strings of lexical and numeric characters in the form of domain names that serve as electronic addresses. more

The typical daily accounting of decisions filed in disputes under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) may include an award or two dismissing complaints (three is particularly noteworthy: weddingfleamarket.com, dme.com, and scheduleflow.com from the Forum for January 20, 2018), but overwhelmingly complaints are granted not dismissed. Let us imagine a trademark or service mark that is neither a dictionary word nor composed of common combinations, would anyone be surprised when the Panel rules in Complainant's favor? more

Promoted Post

Buying or Selling IPv4 Addresses?

Watch this video to discover how ACCELR/8, a transformative trading platform developed by industry veterans Marc Lindsey and Janine Goodman, enables organizations to buy or sell IPv4 blocks as small as /20s.

Avenue4 LLCRead4635

A World-Renowned Source for Internet Developments. Serving Since 2002.