If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

99

The problem with Bosnia (and with other places on the map) is : do you want to better model the start of the end of scenario ? You can't have both... it would require adding an insane amount of provinces for each border change. So one needs to select a point in time and "stick" to it... or compromise.

The problem with Bosnia (and with other places on the map) is : do you want to better model the start of the end of scenario ? You can't have both... it would require adding an insane amount of provinces for each border change. So one needs to select a point in time and "stick" to it... or compromise.

Yeah .. that would be my idea on how to set it up, just as a suggestion.

I don't like the idea of adding too many provinces to Europe in general, so four is the max they'd get.

The Ottoman Bosnia would then simply have all the four + one more north-west of it, without a port and with Bihać as the province's main city.

This way, the province density is around the same as in HRE or UK, so that's fine in my opinion.

Sure, any province in this map could be expanded a little bit to match the adequat size. There should not be any problem here. 1 could take a little bit on 2 and 3 and 13 could take on 18 and on Picardy.

In vanilla there is 3 costal cities, but in your current map there is 4 coastal cities, and in my map correction, there is 4 also. It's just the same. So it should not be a problem at all.

[QUOTE=CanOmer;12006243]I'm considering modern Belgium borders, so these 7 provinces must be in Belgium territory. Some provinces became larger, some provinces smaller. Thus, this can't be same as your map %100.

Why are you going for modern Belgium borders? Belgium wasn't around in the EU3 timeframe. And as far as I know the divisions of Limburg and Luxemburg at the end of the war against Netherlands were somewhat arbitrary meaning, not really matching former history.

99

I can only agree with Ilkhold. Principality of Liège and of Antwerpen went further into your provinces of Breda. Big part of the south of the province of Liège should belong to the province of Luxemburg.

I'd give the northern half of Limburg to Breda, and give east part of Brabant above Liège to Limburg.

I'm considering modern Belgium borders, so these 7 provinces must be in Belgium territory. Some provinces became larger, some provinces smaller. Thus, this can't be same as your map %100.

This left me a bit confused, as well. A lot of modern borders were drawn only after the EU3 timeframe - or just in the last years. Wien, Versailles and Yalta were the main forces that shaped this changes - and the earliest is 1815, 6 years before endgame. Basing an Early Modern Age map on Contemporary Age borders is a bit...awkward, even the effect is way better than vanilla map. And, Turin is still in Aosta, and Cuneo in Turin. You did not change that. 8D

I havn't tried your mod yet, but I posted this map suggestion in the Bugreports section. It simply redraws the borders internally in Denmark. You might want to move Lolland a bit to the east though, since it should almost touch Falster.

“You see, señorita, mystery is important. To know everything, to know the whole truth, is dull. There is no magic in that. Magic is not knowing, magic is wondering about what and how and where.” - Cortez, The Longest Journey

I havn't tried your mod yet, but I posted this map suggestion in the Bugreports section. It simply redraws the borders internally in Denmark. You might want to move Lolland a bit to the east though, since it should almost touch Falster.