BUT with HOLLYWOOD's CURRENT AVERSION to ALL THINGS ORIGINAL, HERE's THAT REMAKE NO ONE WAS ASKING FOR!

IT STARS 2004 WORST ACTOR NOMINEE COLIN FARRELL, MULTI-TIME RAZZIE® NOMINEE JESSICA BIEL and PEARL HARBOR SURVIVOR (and FELLOW/FEMALE RAZZIE® NOMINEE) KATE BECKINSALE. IT HAS FIVE NAMES on ITS SCREENPLAY, and HAS APPARENTLY BEEN SITTING on a SHELF in a VAULT SOMEWHERE for SEVERAL MONTHS.

The other day I went to see THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN (no, it shouldn't be nominated for any Razzies). Anyway, they showed the trailer for this, and I wanted to pay full attention to see if there were any noticeable improvements from the first version. I couldn't because I was totally shocked by the fact that they revealed most of the plot twists! It was like they expect people to remember the first one. If so, why did they remake it?

I'm still looking forward to the film even with the negative reviews. I saw the original around last month for the first time and enjoyed it immensely. It seems this one is much more serious, which should be enough for a different experience.

Vits, the trailer showed the three boobed lady. When a trailer shows something, it's fair game, and doesn't need a "spoiler whiteout."

As for why she's still here, it was one of the iconic scenes from the first one. In the commentary track I mentioned a few posts above, that's all Ah-nuld seems to talk about when Paul Verhoeven isn't saying "izznit?". The fact that they had to put the three boobed lady shows how serious they were about adapting the original story. I wouldn't mention this except that they said they wanted this to be more faithful.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot create polls in this forumYou can vote in polls in this forum