Our recommendations so far are pretty broad in nature, and I'm
wondering if we can get more specific. It seems to me that specific
recommendations are more likely to be realized. At the same time,
there are things we can't be specific about because we don't know the
answer.
Here's the deduplication recommendation as an example:
Analysis for the transformation of current library data to LLD
* Goal: maximize the value of library data through use and re-use
o From records to statements
o From text to data
o Both the transformation of the data as well as the
migration of systems
* Study LLD from an information seeker's point of view
* Consider LLD not just as a transformation of current library
data but as leading to a new vision of future library data
* Set priorities, or at least create criteria for prioritization
(unique materials v. mass produced; unique data v. shared data)
Can we be more specific than this?
link:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_issues_page#Analysis_for_the_transformation_of_current_library_data_to_LLD
--
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet