Press Releases

Aug282019

Washington–Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and a group of their Senate colleagues called on Attorney General William Barr to rescind his decision in Matter of L-E-A-, which limits access to asylum for people fleeing persecution abroad because of their family ties. For more than 30 years, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and multiple federal circuit courts have acknowledged that a family group can be a “particular social group” as the basis of an asylum claim. This long-settled case law has allowed people who have been threatened or victimized because of their membership in a family to seek asylum in the United States. AG Barr’s decision disregards these decades of legal precedent.

“Your decision, and the many other actions taken by this Administration to undermine the asylum system, run counter to Congress’s intent to provide protection to vulnerable people suffering persecution in their home country,” the members wrote. “We urge you to rescind your decision in Matter of L-E-A- and preserve the critical protections for those who experience persecution based on their membership in a family.”

We write to express our alarm and opposition to your decision in Matter of L-E-A-, which limits access to asylum for people fleeing persecution abroad because of their family ties. Your decision, and the many other actions taken by this Administration to undermine the asylum system, run counter to Congress’s intent to provide protection to vulnerable people suffering persecution in their home country.

This decision disregards decades of legal precedent. For over 30 years, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and multiple federal circuit courts have acknowledged that a family group can be a “particular social group” as the basis of an asylum claim. This long-settled case law has allowed people who have been threatened or victimized because of their membership in a family to seek asylum in the United States.

In Matter of L-E-A-, the BIA applied that precedent to an asylum case brought by a man who was threatened by a criminal cartel in Mexico because his father refused to allow the cartel to sell drugs in the family’s store. The BIA had “no difficulty identifying the respondent, a son residing in his father’s home, as being a member of the particular social group comprised of his father’s immediate family.”[1] But in reviewing the BIA’s decision, you used sweeping language throughout the opinion to overrule the BIA’s conclusion and hold that family membership cannot be considered a particular social group unless it is recognized by society as socially distinct.[2]

Your decision will create greater risks and hardships for those who may be in most need of protection. Families who flee their homes in order to protect their children from persecution are often the most vulnerable. In addition, unaccompanied minors seeking asylum often rely on family-based claims.

We urge you to rescind your decision in Matter of L-E-A- and preserve the critical protections for those who experience persecution based on their membership in a family.