LUMPENPROLETARIAT—On today’s edition of Guns and Butter, host Bonnie Faulkner presented Part 4 of a fascinating series of interviews with Kevin Ryan on his book, Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects. [1]

By now, it’s quite well understood that the official 9/11 Commission Report was fatally flawed, depriving the American people of a sincere investigation into the crimes of 9/11, which have been used as continuing justification for endless war everywhere, in other words, endless justification for U.S. imperialism justified by fears of synthetic threats, giving new meaning to the term manufacturing consent.

Kevin Ryan‘s book, Another Nineteen, provides a comprehensive study of the current body of research on the prime suspects, who deserve to be investigated for their apparent roles in carrying out the crimes of 9/11. Listen (and/or download) here. [2]

Messina

***

[Working draft transcript of actual radio broadcast by Messina for Lumpenproletariat and Guns and Butter.]

KEVIN RYAN: “And, so, if we see the film, what most people really remember is not how the buildings fell in a very inexplicable way, they remember the fireballs. They remember these pyrotechnic effects occurring on 9/11.”

“Kevin Ryan was site manager of a division of Underwriters Laboratories, or UL. As a manager at Underwriters, he began in 2003 to question the World Trade Center investigation being conducted by UL and the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and UL’s work to insure the fire resistance of the buildings.

BONNIE FAULKNER: “In your chapter, ‘Bremer, Jenkins and Terrorism Propaganda‘, you begin with the example of the Cold War, which was driven by threats to national security and hyped by the media. You draw a parallel with the same tactics used in driving the War On Terror. How was the communist threat sold to the public? And who was behind this?” (c. 2:20)