Just reading and wondered if the theory of Milton-DeGrazie that was published to the web some time ago is what you are thinking about? Their idea was that Jupiter was responsible for planetary births due to a magnetic 'rope' connection. Here it is years later and the magnetic rope is back in fashion. I don't think the idea that Jupiter spawned planets has ever been out of fashion. Leeway should be given here as so many theories by the scientific community have to be retracted ----- look at the Higgs fiasco---that theories by individuals should not be discounted but considered for the bits of truth within.

Found this PDF link a while back, but have not had time to read it....... SOLARIA BINARIA

__________________

"Creating a fiction when stating a fact destroys the credibility of the truth one are trying to convey"

Just reading and wondered if the theory of Milton-DeGrazie that was published to the web some time ago is what you are thinking about? Their idea was that Jupiter was responsible for planetary births due to a magnetic 'rope' connection. Here it is years later and the magnetic rope is back in fashion. I don't think the idea that Jupiter spawned planets has ever been out of fashion. Leeway should be given here as so many theories by the scientific community have to be retracted ----- look at the Higgs fiasco---that theories by individuals should not be discounted but considered for the bits of truth within.

I meant what I said. The data is forensic investigation of ancient texts. Not my work. You can look up David Talbott and Wallace Thornhill. It's not going to be the exact age of course, but you get it.

I've been dealing with politics and stuff lately so I won't be around here too much. You can look up the Polar Configuration reconstructed by Talbott and Cochrane and Thornhill.

'If the magnetic field...has the ability to act with magnetic energy far beyond what we expect, then what is it?"I would assume it's still a magnetic field :P .

I don't quite understand your question.

I think that you can't go call something anomalous without knowing what you are talking about. Most of the 'anomalies' I see on this website are either:

-misinterpretations of geology

-geology unusual on Earth because different processes formed them

-paradolia (seeing some strange resemblence and right off the bat, assuming it is important)

-'true' anomalies that are only anomalous when viewed from within the blinders of mainstream 'science'

-waves of glassified material or waves of sand misinterpreted as water

-photomanipulation to hide evidence of mineral deposits so that other countries won't know about them before mining rights are secured

Seeing a magnetic field as anomalous should only occur if you are still within the realm of gas-lamp physics, which believes in black holes, dark matter, 'neutron stars' which violate the island of stability principle, etc etc.

I'll tell you this. Venus is a young planet, probably only 10,000 years old or less. It has all that atmosphere because of this - it was expelled from the gas giant Saturn. This is similar to Titan. It exhibits cometary features (electric discharge phenomena) and 'strange' geology. When mainstream scientists look at alien geology, they are baffled and try to compare it with something we see on Earth, which usually just doesn't work. This is especially obvious with the claimed "volcanoes" on Io. I don't do much on this site much, but you seem fairly intelligent. Research everything I said - I didn't tell one lie here.

Not only does he have the establishment against him, he also has the electric universe people who view him as another Velikovsky. If the magnetic field now incurring (supposedly at Venus now) has the ability to act with magnetic energy far beyond what we expect, then what is it?