Buying voluntary offsets can and should be a regular part of the casual environmentalist’s lifestyle, just like recycling or carpooling. In this series, we’ll explore the voluntary carbon market, how to participate and why now is the time for action.

Deloitte has centered on two key areas where it can leverage its strengths as a business service provider to have a positive impact for the long term on the communities in which it operates: education and workforce development.

Monsanto presents a series on what it means to be “Climate Smart” in the world of agriculture. The series will cover the role of climate change in impacting food security, agriculture, weather patterns and society at large.

In this editorial series we’ll explore the role of business in supporting access to education and opportunities, and consider the best way to prepare a generation of leaders who understand the importance of sustainable development.

So, your company wants to reduce its landfill waste. Now what? As sustainability reaches top of mind for investors and customers, more companies are beginning to tackle waste in their supply chains in order to boost their green cred.

An event series whose mission it is to bring together companies from around the world to discuss climate change and how they can work together to address it most impactfully. Now building sponsorship and registration. [INFO HERE]

For NI17 we’re creating an experience unlike any conference you’ve been to before. We’ll help you map out your Path to Purpose to turn your passion into a purposeful career by gaining tangible skills and actionable insights. [INFO HERE]

A new report from a U.K.-based NGO says the enormous control and influence that the world’s largest foundation has may actually be detrimental to global development.

In fact, the scathing report from Global Justice Now accuses the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with an endowment of $43 billion, of cozy relationships with big corporations, and a general lack of efficacy in tackling the challenges that form the core of its mission.

Now, this report expands the Gates Foundation’s shady practices beyond the fossil fuel industry, into genetically modified organism (GMO) research on behalf of corporations like Monsanto and Syngenta and close partnerships with pharmaceutical companies eager to tap into developing markets. This exhibits itself in the Foundation’s narrow-minded focus on fighting single diseases like polio, rather than building resilient, locally-run health care systems, which have been proven to be more effective at actually fighting disease.

“The philanthropic vision of the Gates Foundation seems to be largely based on the values of corporate America,” said Polly Jones, the head of campaigns and policy at Global Justice Now, in a press statement.

There is a fundamental problem with foundations that are run too top-down. The priorities tend to be set by a board that is disconnected from the reality of problems on the ground. Bill Gates, who is a brilliant technologist and businessperson, does not have experience in international development.

The Gates Foundation has been criticized for its focus on technological solutions, such as GMO crops or cheaper smartphones, even though the real problem in many developing countries is not lack of technology. It’s lack of access to justice, education, health care – all issues that the Gates Foundation is, essentially, ignoring.

“The foundation is relentlessly promoting big business-based initiatives such as industrial agriculture, private health care and education,” Jones continued. “But these are all potentially exacerbating the problems of poverty and lack of access to basic resources that the foundation is supposed to be alleviating.”

As someone who worked for years in developing countries, let me tell you, the problems are far more complex on the ground than they seem from a distance. The organizations that succeed are the ones that focus on empowering locals to make change, and are willing to put in the effort to not only listen to them, but also to design projects that think holistically, are cross-sectoral, and work on a local, not global, timescale. The Gates Foundation is not known as being hugely effective despite it’s massive size and scope.

The Foundation defended itself forcefully against the accusations made in the report, and it is unlikely that it will change its focus away from promoting corporate globalization as a solution to the world’s problems. And that’s the true shame, because the impact that Gates and his Foundation could have if they were focused on local, grassroots solutions is immense.

One response

Yes the problem is lack of justice, safety, education, etc. But there is a development theory that says that when you empower people with money, they can get those things for themselves. There is another theory that if the technolgy gap gets too big the developing world will never catch up. I feel like a “defacto corporate front” is pretty harsh, and also wiping out polio hurts vaccine companies in the long run. It makes me angry when development people feel okay with being all high and mighty with people who have done more for the world than they will ever do.