lucene-dev mailing list archives

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs

Date

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:29:33 GMT

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12914551#action_12914551
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---------------------------------------
bq. Can't we first just allow the retrieval of ByteValues, etc, that also have Bits on it?
I sure *hope* so... otherwise, I doubt anything will move forward.
My hope with LUCENE-2665, is to fix the basic problem -- in a way that does not close the
door to the improvements we want to make in the future. I think/hope we are close.
If I'm missing something let me know, so I can stop wasting my time.
(I don't even know what CSF is, and do not want to learn right now)
> FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2649
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch, LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch,
LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch, LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch, LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch
>
>
> The FieldCache returns an array representing the values for each doc. However there
is no way to know if the doc actually has a value.
> This should be changed to return an object representing the values *and* a BitSet for
all valid docs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org