OBAMA HAS GREENLIT FIRING ON CIVILIANS ONCE; Be Sure He’ll Do It Again!

VERY FEW PEOPLE ARE AWARE OBAMA HAS GIVEN THE ORDER TO FIRE ON CITIZENS ONCE ALREADY!

WHY? DON’T MORE KNOW?

ONLY FOX COVERED IT!

THE FOLLOWING IS ALMOST 8 MINUTES OF THE SCARIEST VIDEO I’VE EVER SEEN AS AN AMERICAN!

DURING THE STANDOFF AT THE BUNDY RANCH, MOST PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW THINGS GOT SO DANGEROUSLY CLOSE TO ESCALATING INTO UNCONTROLLABLE DISASTER, THAT’BUT FOR’ A MOVIE DIRECTORAT THE RANCH WHO JUST HAPPENED TO BE DOCUMENTING THE EVENT, WE MIGHT BE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SECOND CIVIL WAR. HECK, I’D BET ON CIVIL WAR, HAD THE MASSACRE THAT OBAMA GREEN LIGHTED TAKEN PLACE!

LISTEN TO THE BLM SOLDIER IN THE VIDEO. HE SAYS THEY HAD AGREEN LIGHT TO FIRE ON THE MILITIA.WHAT IF THIS BRAVE DIRECTOR HADN’T ACTED OUT OF INSTINCT TO DIFFUSE TO THE SITUATION? IS THAT WHAT GOVERNMENT IS HOPING FOR? TO PUSH US OVER THE EDGE? WATCH FOR YOURSELF. BY MINUTE 7 OF AN 8 MINUTE CLIP, I COULD BARELY SWALLOW! IT SCARED ME TO DEATH!!!

Let me ask you something: Do you think the military practices scenarios they have no intention of carrying out? It’s a simple question. It warrants a simple answer. Obama HIMSELF has said how he plans to implement MARTIAL LAW:

Obama claims he will develop “An Appropriate Legal Regime” to permanently detain people PRIOR to having committed any crime. The idea of these detentions would be to prevent any individual from committing aFUTURE crime. Obama even goes as far as to say he might detain someone up to TEN YEARS before they MIGHT commit a crime.

The new Army manual, known as ATP 3-39.33, provides discussion and techniques about civil disturbances and crowd control operations that occur in the continental United States (CONUS) and outside the continental United States (OCONUS).

This document, just published this past Friday, August 15, 2014, promises to change the way the “authorities” deal with protesters, even peaceful ones. The consequences of ATP 39.33 could prove deadly for protesters. Further, the provisions of this Army manual could prove to be the end of the First Amendment right to peaceably assemble.

On August 15, 2014, the U.S. Army published and released the Army-Civil Disturbances Manual-2014. The contents are frightening and should be offensive to American citizen.

In section 1-2., the manual states that “Civil unrest may range from simple, nonviolent protests that address specific issues, to events that turn into full-scale riots“. This section of the manual clearly states that protesting is a right protected by the Constitution. However, the authorities leave themselves an out to “legally” engage in lethal force toward protesters when the manual states that “peaceful protests can turn into full-scale riots” and field commanders have the right to make that determination. Subsequently, all protests, peaceful or not, need to be managed by the potential for violence. In other words, all protests are to be considered to be violent and handled accordingly. This certainly explains the violent manhandling of the media by the DHS controlled and militarized police in Ferguson, MO.

Posse Comitatus Is Violated

On the surface, the Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385) act should prevent the Army from deploying the troops in the midst of a protest that is not on the scale of something like the 1992 LA Riots. However, the Army claims exemption from Posse Comitatus in the four following areas.

10 USC 331. When a state is unable to control domestic violence and they have requested federal assistance, the use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized.

10 USC 332. When ordinary enforcement means are unworkable due to unlawful obstructions or rebellion against the authority of the United States, use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized.

10 USC 333. When a state cannot or will not protect the constitutional rights of the citizens, due to domestic violence or conspiracy to hinder execution of State or Federal law, the use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized.

House Joint Resolution 1292. This resolution directs all departments of the U.S. government, upon request of the Secret Service, to assist in carrying out its statutory duties to protect government officials and major political candidates from physical harm.

With regard to 10 USC 331, if the local authorities have lost control in the midst of a profound display of domestic violence (e.g. LA Riots), most Americans support the use of National Guard or the military. However, in 10 USC 332, 333 and House Joint Resolution 1292 are ripe with exceptions which opens the door to federal authorities abusing the public for exercising their Constitutional right to protest.

In 10 USC 332, the phrase “unlawful obstructions or rebellion against the authority of the United States, use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized” and this permits the federal government from being demonstrated against. An act of demonstration, or the most benign demonstrations of civil disobedience gives the government the authority to take “deadly action” against the public because there are no clear distinctions on when the use of lethal and nonlethal force is appropriate (see the two charts displayed below).

In 10 USC 333, any disruption of federal law can be decisively dealt with by the federal government. The phrase “…conspiracy to hinder execution of State or Federal law, the use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized” is a telling passage of this Army document.

Conservative Tribune writes: The Sugar Pine Mining owners have been mining their land for a century but now the federal Bureau of Land Management is trying to take over. In response, an armedmilitia groupknown as The Oath Keepers are stepping in to defend the miners.

Oregon-based Sugar Pine Mining faced an April 25 deadline to get their equipment off the land. However, with theOath Keepershelp, they intend to fight the BLM.

Although the cost to fight the BLM is expensive, the Miners contend that it is not as costly as the infringement upon their rights.

“This case is headed in a direction that presents what is probably a once-in-a-generation prime opportunity to strike at the heart of the very surface management authority of the (Departments of the Interior and Agriculture) and to restore the ‘as patent’ rights of every mining claim owner in the United States by striking down the actual source of that intrusive authority,” they wrote in a statement.

The Sugar Pine Mining claim is the oldest in America, having been established in 1876.

Its argument contends that the government does not have the authority in the Galice Mining District due to it being defined byCongressas a “local governing body for and by miners” giving them the sole “right to create and enforce local rules and regulations” provided that they did not conflict with U.S. law.

The Blaze reported that the miners also argued they were not provided any evidence that their rights were severed by the 1955 Surface Resources Act, which would be the only legal way they can lose their exclusive rights to a well-established claim.

The Oath Keepers have stepped in to defend the mining community, which has produced more than 10 million ounces of gold and where geologists estimate as many as 90 million more ounces could still be discovered.

“That’s what being an American’s all about,” Blaine Cooper, an Arizona State Militia member, stated as he drove to Oregon, in a video posted to YouTube. “We don’t allow our neighbor to be enslaved or beaten or tortured by government jackboots because they want to steal our land and our resources to keep us under their thumb.”

However, the BLM argues that the documents held by the miners are outdated and defunct. Additionally, because the mine’s ownership has shifted since the 1870s, the miners’ claim would not fall under a grandfathered rule as the miners maintain.

“We’ve sent them those letters,” the BLM’s Jim Whittington told KDRV. “They also have the right to appeal our notice, that it requires either a plan of operation or notice, and some informal contacts with their lawyer … it sounds like they may appeal. So if they appeal, that starts another administrative appeal process.”