$\begingroup$1-Ethoxypropan-2-ol and 2-ethoxypropan-1-ol are different compounds; therefore, this is not mainly a problem of nomenclature rules. You should try to draw both compounds.$\endgroup$
– Loong♦Jan 12 at 8:56

$\begingroup$I've replaced the formula (which could be interpreted ambiguously) with the image, probably this can also assist you in understanding how the name emerges.$\endgroup$
– andseliskJan 12 at 9:00

$\begingroup$@andselisk Skeletal formula with inconsistent carbon explicitness can have other problems…$\endgroup$
– mykhalJan 12 at 11:38

$\begingroup$@mykhal I'm not sure what you mean by " inconsistent carbon explicitness" (hidden labels for carbons/hydrogens?), but feel free to roll back my edit if you think it adds confusion:)$\endgroup$
– andseliskJan 12 at 11:44

$\begingroup$@andselisk Right. But, whether the structure formula change is useful depends on why Abhishek thinks it should be named differently. I mean, it might be useful, but rather as an answer; implanting into the question might not help understanding Q. author thought process.$\endgroup$
– mykhalJan 13 at 7:15