A Brits View of Hillary Clinton

GradeAUnderA is a Youtuber with a fairly large following of 3 million people.

He makes video's about the things that grinds his gears and adds a comedy twist to them, with all the drama around these elections he's decided to
give his thoughts on both the presidential candidates, this weeks video is about Hillary, his next video posted on Friday will be about Donald
Trump.

His goal is to educate people about the presidential candidates so that they can make an informed decision on who to vote for in November.

He mentions things such as rigging the primaries against Sanders, flip-flopping on her public stances, having two stances, public and private, and her
notion of thinking a No-Fly zone is Syria is a good idea when in reality it could cause a Nuclear War.

[Editors Notes: This is my first thread, I hope I was clear about the content and that it follows community guidelines, I am not Youtube User
GradeAUnderA, I just like his content and thought it was thread-worthy.]

I'm subscribed to Grade and I like what he's doing - giving opinion from the British point of view. He condemns those on YouTube who try to garner
extra support for their particular side such as Casey Neistat who posted a pro-Hillary video.

I look forwards to seeing his video on Trump and fundamentally agree with his standpoint as a fellow Brit. He seems honest and he appears to champion
the circulation of information to make informed choices, though I feel he may come out for Jill Stein on the final video.

Excellent video. Really break's the important stuff down for everyone to understand. I will be sharing this for sure. Hopefully his trump video is as
brutally honest, It would be nice to know at least one person still retained some integrity this election cycle.

Such a no nonsense fellow. I highly appreciate his delivery on this subject, and while I am not a fan of simplifying things over much, as potted
descriptions of the awfulness that is Hilary Clinton go, his has to be one of the most impactful, if only because it is delivered with zero
unnecessary drama. It's just an honest reaction, to some honestly appalling information. Yes, he could have gone into the fact that alongside her
defence of clearly guilty child rapists, she is married to a pervert, which makes her a hypocrite when she calls out Trump for being scum (which he
is), but aside from that, he covered all the major issues without partisanship, and this is important for any genuine social or political commentary.

You have been here since 2011 Indigo5, so you should know by now that posting a video from YouTube because it pushes your conspiracy button, or might
be found useful or amusing by the members, is completely legitimate.

The first version of "Loose Change" I ever watched was on YouTube, but it was embedded here on ATS, and it was every bit the worthy post that
contained it. This may be less dramatic and data intensive, but it is quality content none the less, and breaks many things down into their roots,
cutting through significant streams of nonsense along the way. Its good stuff, and I have seen worse videos posted with less good intention before
now, which did not receive any complaint at all!

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.