This is not a time when women should be patient. We are in a war and we need to fight it with all our ability and every weapon possible. Women pilots, in this particular case, are a weapon waiting to be used.
— Eleanor Roosevelt, 1942.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

need a job?

The Air Force is looking apparently. Like this should be a surprise. This was on the Air Force Times website. This will probably be the first and only time I actually visit it.

Retirees, reservists to be tapped for empty jobs

The Air Force is turning to retirees and reservists to fill 1,600 empty flying and staff positions — a strategy that could eventually have 58-year-old lieutenant colonels flying alongside officers half their age.

If you are a retired rated officer or a rated officer on traditional reserve status, the Air Force wants you back on active-duty status to fly or serve in staff positions for up to four years.

For retired officers, the program is open to aviators who retired at the rank of lieutenant colonel or below and will not be older than 60 when their service starts.

For former rated officers O-5 and below who left before they were eligible to retire, the program is open to aviators on individual ready reserve status or serving as traditional members of the Reserve or Air National Guard.

Successful applicants are expected to pass the Air Force fitness test for their age group.

Application information should be posted later this week on the Air Force Personnel Center’s Web site.

While the article makes it seem like 58-year-olds are going to be flying fighters, the it is much more likely that they will get these retired or separated former-AF pilots to fly UAVs. They are still considered "flying" positions, and are one of the only jobs in the AF that is not properly manned. This will probably be good news for anyone eligible that has recently lost a job in the current stellar economy.

And I do not like the AF Times because the one time I actually spent money to buy it, the publication called the F-117 and the F-15 the "Fighting Falcon." Not exactly great fact-checking there...

4 Comments:

Would be hesitant to assume that most of these folks would be going to fly UAVs...I'm sure some of them are, but at the moment USAF staff billets requiring a rated officer are woefully undermanned (to the tune of 97% unfilled). I would guess that most of these officers would be heading there.

consider simply how much time I had spent for this info! Thanks! I don??t even know how I ended up right here, however I believed this put up was [url=http://www.2013paschersaclongchamp.com/sac-hobo-longchamp-pas-cher-c-2.html]Sac Hobo Longchamp Pas Cher[/url] good. Sac En Bandoulière Longchamp Pas Cher [url=http://www.2013paschersaclongchamp.com/sac-%C3%A0-dos-longchamp-pas-cher-c-3.html]Sac à Dos Longchamp Pas Cher[/url] , I don't understand who you might be but certainly you're going to a well-known blogger in the event you are not already ;) Cheers! Heya i am for [url=http://www.2013paschersaclongchamp.com/sac-%C3%A0-dos-longchamp-pas-cher-c-3.html]Sac à Dos Longchamp Pas Cher[/url] the primary time here. Sac Longchamp Bagages Pas cher [url=http://www.2013paschersaclongchamp.com/sac-en-bandouli%C3%A8re-longchamp-pas-cher-c-1.html]Sac En Bandoulière Longchamp Pas Cher[/url] , I came across this board and I to find It really useful & it helped me out a lot. I'm hoping to give something again and aid others like you aided me.

About Me

This blog in no way represents the views of the U.S. Air Force or any other government entity.
That being said, I am thankful for Jesus, coffee, dogs, daisies, unexpectedly good things happening, jet engines (ok props too), live music, and beer.