The Indiana Court of Appeals has reversed a trial judge on a land use dispute between two sets of neighbors, finding that
the clear meanings of “ingress" and "egress” do not include parking as two of the Porter County residents
had argued based on past caselaw.

With one judge frustrated that Indiana residents and students may have been “hornswoggled” by a college’s
advertisements about being accredited, the Indiana Court of Appeals has upheld an order compelling arbitration on a claim
that three students were fraudulently induced to enroll because of misrepresentation about that accreditation.

The Indiana Supreme Court has put its stamp of approval on an intermediate appellate panel’s ruling last year, finding
that the state’s existing Post-Conviction Rule 2 that allows for belated appeals on certain criminal cases doesn’t
apply to probation revocations.

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the finding that a Brownsburg attorney and his wife fraudulently withheld their
2001 income from the Internal Revenue Service through an elaborate shell game.

Adding to what it has already done in targeting two “notario publicos” for illegally offering immigration services,
the Indiana Attorney General’s Office has now filed a criminal Unauthorized Practice of Law charge and several tax evasion
counts against one of those non-lawyers who was operating in Indianapolis.

A renowned intellectual property scholar will present a lecture at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law next month.
Graeme Dinwoodie, director of the Oxford University Intellectual Property Research Centre, will lecture on “Global Marks
in Local Markets: Territoriality in EU and U.S. Trademark Law,” at noon April 6 in the law school’s Moot Court
Room.

A Marion Superior judge has ordered Indiana state officials to turn over thousands of documents relating to the state’s
cancellation of a welfare system modernization, ruling on an issue of first impression about whether a “deliberative
processes” executive privilege exists in Indiana.

The Indiana Court of Appeals has held – with a few exceptions – that a trial court may revoke probation for not
satisfying a financial obligation only if the state proves by a preponderance of the evidence there is less than full payment
and the probationer submitted that smaller payment recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally.

Unexpected audits, bankruptcy complications, and misunderstandings about tax law are what bring many low-income clients to
the Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic’s Low-Income Taxpayer Clinic. The LITC staff – one tax attorney, one paralegal,
and one outreach coordinator fluent in English and Spanish – helps clients understand how to handle complicated tax
issues.

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal of a workers’ compensation claim, finding the worker’s deposition
testimony didn’t support the Indiana Worker’s Compensation Board’s finding that he admitted his condition
stemmed from a single incident.

In tackling a child support case involving a teenager’s emancipation, Indiana Court of Appeals judges disagree on what
state statute defines as “enrolled” in college. One judge believes the majority wrongly reweighed evidence in
this case to come to its decision.

The Indiana Supreme Court decided a case seven years ago but left for another day the answer to a question about governmental
attorney fees, and now that specific issue has found its way to an appeal before the state’s second-highest appellate
court.

The Indiana Court of Appeals of Indiana will hear oral arguments on an appeal regarding a defendant’s conviction of
Class D felony sexual battery March 24 at 11 a.m. at Indiana State University’s Hulman Memorial Student Union.

If you watch the NFL Network, you may have recognized a familiar name among the commentators. Indiana University School of
Law – Indianapolis Dean Gary R. Roberts has been serving as an on-air legal analyst for the network discussing the current
labor dispute between NFL owners and players.

Although sympathetic to a couple whose child was temporarily removed from the family’s home on child abuse concerns
– a removal that was subsequently found not to be supported by probable cause – the 7th Circuit Court of
Appeals affirmed summary judgment for Department of Child Services employees on qualified immunity grounds.