Byron York on Brit Hume

York just mentioned that some experts think the documents are forgeries, but that one he talked to said he thought it "probably" was produced by a conventional typewriter.

Except.

Except he could not figure out how a typewriter typed a superscripted "th," and said he knew of no typewriters that had such a feature. The expert said he simply could not explain this.

So that, too, would seem to be a reluctant admission that this is a forgery. I mean, you can't really say "I think most of this could have been done on a special high-end typewriter, except for this one thing, which is impossible, ergo a typewriter probably produced most of the document."