From joel.a.berger at gmail.com Mon Aug 20 10:23:48 2012
From: joel.a.berger at gmail.com (Joel Berger)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:23:48 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Thursday -- Chicago.pm meeting!
Message-ID:
Hello everyone,
This thursday I will be presenting an enhanced version of my YAPC::NA
talk about my scientific modeling using Moose and other Modern Perl
niceties. Here is the announcement:
Title:
Signatures, Moose, and MooseX::Declare for real world applications
Abstract:
Moose and Method::Signatures have changed how object oriented code is
written in Perl. MooseX::Declare makes writing it even easier. In this
talk I will briefly introduce M::S, then Moose and finally MX::D
before moving on to show how I use these module (and some of my own)
to model the behavior of electron pulses in a time-resolved electron
microscope. Modern Perl OO makes this simulation comprehensible in
ways that other scientific languages couldn't. Don't worry I'll keep
the science easy and maybe even fun.
Slides and code are available at
https://github.com/jberger/WCpm-Moose-Talk and
https://github.com/jberger/YAPCNA2012/tree/master/NumSim respectively.
The official announcement, along with meeting details can be found at:
http://www.meetup.com/Windy-City-Perl-mongers-Meetup/events/71369352/
I hope to see you all there!
Joel Berger
From joel.a.berger at gmail.com Thu Aug 23 09:17:22 2012
From: joel.a.berger at gmail.com (Joel Berger)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:17:22 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Brief intro to Moose, plus real world Moose
Message-ID:
No not real Moose, but our beloved module for Perl.
I want to once again invite everyone to the Chicago.pm meeting
tonight. I will be introducing Moose, but fear not if you already love
it well, the introduction won't be long. I want this talk to start the
new ones down the path to Moose-yness but I get bored of
introductions. I want to show you how Moose has made my scientific
simulations easier.
I have written some interesting modules to help with science in Perl,
and I have written some high-powered simulations, all of which I hope
to show you. I hope to convince you that Perl's legendary flexibility
along with Moose's help has made Perl a contender in the scientific
world, though it may not know it yet. And if you are not a scientist,
you need not fear either. I won't fill you full of equations, and in
the end, my use of Moose could as easily inspire a stock trader
application or bank software or website; this is after all Moose in
the wild.
If you would like to attend, please visit the meetup page,
http://www.meetup.com/Windy-City-Perl-mongers-Meetup/events/71369352/
for more info and to RSVP. Yes we can get you in without RSVPing but
it is easier that way.
Cheers and I hope to see you all there!
Joel Berger
From madcityzen at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 10:50:21 2012
From: madcityzen at gmail.com (Doug Bell)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:50:21 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Test recursively in Makefile.PL
Message-ID:
I have a number of projects using ExtUtils::MakeMaker and
Module::Install. Everything works great except for testing: Only the
top level of t/* gets run as tests, not the sub directories.
I've tried specifying the TESTS argument to EUMM as '', but this still
doesn't glob the subdirectories (though running "prove -r t/*.t
t/**/*.t" works as expected).
How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?
From joel.a.berger at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 11:00:15 2012
From: joel.a.berger at gmail.com (Joel Berger)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:00:15 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Test recursively in Makefile.PL
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
I know Module::Build has a recursive_test_files option which would do
what you want. That doesn't help you with EUMM, but I only know M::B.
If you need to and wanted to switch I could try to help.
Joel Berger
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
> I have a number of projects using ExtUtils::MakeMaker and
> Module::Install. Everything works great except for testing: Only the
> top level of t/* gets run as tests, not the sub directories.
>
> I've tried specifying the TESTS argument to EUMM as '', but this still
> doesn't glob the subdirectories (though running "prove -r t/*.t
> t/**/*.t" works as expected).
>
> How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
From joel.a.berger at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 11:02:10 2012
From: joel.a.berger at gmail.com (Joel Berger)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:02:10 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Test recursively in Makefile.PL
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
This is rather old and thus possibly out of date, but as of 2006
recursive test directories weren't possible via EUMM
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2006/11/msg7405.html
Joel
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Joel Berger wrote:
> I know Module::Build has a recursive_test_files option which would do
> what you want. That doesn't help you with EUMM, but I only know M::B.
> If you need to and wanted to switch I could try to help.
>
> Joel Berger
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
>> I have a number of projects using ExtUtils::MakeMaker and
>> Module::Install. Everything works great except for testing: Only the
>> top level of t/* gets run as tests, not the sub directories.
>>
>> I've tried specifying the TESTS argument to EUMM as '', but this still
>> doesn't glob the subdirectories (though running "prove -r t/*.t
>> t/**/*.t" works as expected).
>>
>> How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
From joel.a.berger at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 11:05:35 2012
From: joel.a.berger at gmail.com (Joel Berger)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:05:35 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Test recursively in Makefile.PL
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
And it seems this is still true:
https://metacpan.org/module/ExtUtils::MakeMaker#make-test

make test
MakeMaker checks for the existence of a file named test.pl in the
current directory and if it exists it execute the script with the
proper set of perl -I options.
MakeMaker also checks for any files matching glob("t/*.t"). It will
execute all matching files in alphabetical order via the Test::Harness
module with the -I switches set correctly.

Joel
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Joel Berger wrote:
> This is rather old and thus possibly out of date, but as of 2006
> recursive test directories weren't possible via EUMM
>
> http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2006/11/msg7405.html
>
> Joel
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Joel Berger wrote:
>> I know Module::Build has a recursive_test_files option which would do
>> what you want. That doesn't help you with EUMM, but I only know M::B.
>> If you need to and wanted to switch I could try to help.
>>
>> Joel Berger
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
>>> I have a number of projects using ExtUtils::MakeMaker and
>>> Module::Install. Everything works great except for testing: Only the
>>> top level of t/* gets run as tests, not the sub directories.
>>>
>>> I've tried specifying the TESTS argument to EUMM as '', but this still
>>> doesn't glob the subdirectories (though running "prove -r t/*.t
>>> t/**/*.t" works as expected).
>>>
>>> How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
From madcityzen at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 11:07:59 2012
From: madcityzen at gmail.com (Doug Bell)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:07:59 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Test recursively in Makefile.PL
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
I _was_ hoping it wouldn't come to that (changing dozens of modules to
M::B), but it's far more important to fix the problem. The two XS+C
modules I have can have their tests flattened if they aren't already.
On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Joel Berger wrote:
> I know Module::Build has a recursive_test_files option which would do
> what you want. That doesn't help you with EUMM, but I only know M::B.
> If you need to and wanted to switch I could try to help.
>
> Joel Berger
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
>> I have a number of projects using ExtUtils::MakeMaker and
>> Module::Install. Everything works great except for testing: Only the
>> top level of t/* gets run as tests, not the sub directories.
>>
>> I've tried specifying the TESTS argument to EUMM as '', but this still
>> doesn't glob the subdirectories (though running "prove -r t/*.t
>> t/**/*.t" works as expected).
>>
>> How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
From joel.a.berger at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 11:33:11 2012
From: joel.a.berger at gmail.com (Joel Berger)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:33:11 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Test recursively in Makefile.PL
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
M::B can build XS/C modules as well, but whichever conversion is
easier for you ...
Joel
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
> I _was_ hoping it wouldn't come to that (changing dozens of modules to
> M::B), but it's far more important to fix the problem. The two XS+C
> modules I have can have their tests flattened if they aren't already.
>
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Joel Berger wrote:
>
>> I know Module::Build has a recursive_test_files option which would do
>> what you want. That doesn't help you with EUMM, but I only know M::B.
>> If you need to and wanted to switch I could try to help.
>>
>> Joel Berger
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
>>> I have a number of projects using ExtUtils::MakeMaker and
>>> Module::Install. Everything works great except for testing: Only the
>>> top level of t/* gets run as tests, not the sub directories.
>>>
>>> I've tried specifying the TESTS argument to EUMM as '', but this still
>>> doesn't glob the subdirectories (though running "prove -r t/*.t
>>> t/**/*.t" works as expected).
>>>
>>> How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
From andy at petdance.com Mon Aug 27 11:46:09 2012
From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:46:09 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Test recursively in Makefile.PL
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <4330F306-E384-447C-B678-CEDA962E2556@petdance.com>
On Aug 27, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
> How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?
Did you try it with just specifying a top level directory name ("t/") instead of the files ("t/*.t")?
prove was written to operate on directories if files weren't specified, like how ack works on directories and you don't have to specify files. That behavior is still there in prove today, but I don't know about doing it through EUMM and however it talks to the harness.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From madcityzen at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 11:54:46 2012
From: madcityzen at gmail.com (Doug Bell)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:54:46 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Test recursively in Makefile.PL
In-Reply-To: <4330F306-E384-447C-B678-CEDA962E2556@petdance.com>
References:
<4330F306-E384-447C-B678-CEDA962E2556@petdance.com>
Message-ID:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?
Did you try it with just specifying a top level directory name ("t/")
instead of the files ("t/*.t")?
prove was written to operate on directories if files weren't specified,
like how ack works on directories and you don't have to specify files.
That behavior is still there in prove today, but I don't know about doing
it through EUMM and however it talks to the harness.
I gave it a try, but it doesn't work as the TESTS argument to EUMM, because
EUMM uses Test::Harness::runtests() directly.
So I've started porting this first module to M::B to see what happens
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From madcityzen at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 11:57:31 2012
From: madcityzen at gmail.com (Doug Bell)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:57:31 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Test recursively in Makefile.PL
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
And M::B works and seems like a quick migration plus some small
additions to my deploy processes. Thanks everybody!
On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Joel Berger wrote:
> I know Module::Build has a recursive_test_files option which would do
> what you want. That doesn't help you with EUMM, but I only know M::B.
> If you need to and wanted to switch I could try to help.
>
> Joel Berger
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
>> I have a number of projects using ExtUtils::MakeMaker and
>> Module::Install. Everything works great except for testing: Only the
>> top level of t/* gets run as tests, not the sub directories.
>>
>> I've tried specifying the TESTS argument to EUMM as '', but this still
>> doesn't glob the subdirectories (though running "prove -r t/*.t
>> t/**/*.t" works as expected).
>>
>> How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
From joel.a.berger at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 12:08:44 2012
From: joel.a.berger at gmail.com (Joel Berger)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:08:44 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Test recursively in Makefile.PL
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
What additions to the deploy process (other than the command names?)?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
> And M::B works and seems like a quick migration plus some small
> additions to my deploy processes. Thanks everybody!
>
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Joel Berger wrote:
>
>> I know Module::Build has a recursive_test_files option which would do
>> what you want. That doesn't help you with EUMM, but I only know M::B.
>> If you need to and wanted to switch I could try to help.
>>
>> Joel Berger
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
>>> I have a number of projects using ExtUtils::MakeMaker and
>>> Module::Install. Everything works great except for testing: Only the
>>> top level of t/* gets run as tests, not the sub directories.
>>>
>>> I've tried specifying the TESTS argument to EUMM as '', but this still
>>> doesn't glob the subdirectories (though running "prove -r t/*.t
>>> t/**/*.t" works as expected).
>>>
>>> How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
From madcityzen at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 12:11:24 2012
From: madcityzen at gmail.com (Doug Bell)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:11:24 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Test recursively in Makefile.PL
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <8243324607279112840@unknownmsgid>
Just detection and running the right commands in Jenkins, which is a
good opportunity for me to refactor all that for better code reuse.
On Aug 27, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Joel Berger wrote:
> What additions to the deploy process (other than the command names?)?
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
>> And M::B works and seems like a quick migration plus some small
>> additions to my deploy processes. Thanks everybody!
>>
>> On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Joel Berger wrote:
>>
>>> I know Module::Build has a recursive_test_files option which would do
>>> what you want. That doesn't help you with EUMM, but I only know M::B.
>>> If you need to and wanted to switch I could try to help.
>>>
>>> Joel Berger
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
>>>> I have a number of projects using ExtUtils::MakeMaker and
>>>> Module::Install. Everything works great except for testing: Only the
>>>> top level of t/* gets run as tests, not the sub directories.
>>>>
>>>> I've tried specifying the TESTS argument to EUMM as '', but this still
>>>> doesn't glob the subdirectories (though running "prove -r t/*.t
>>>> t/**/*.t" works as expected).
>>>>
>>>> How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>>>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>>>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
From madcityzen at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 20:27:06 2012
From: madcityzen at gmail.com (Doug Bell)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:27:06 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Project Night - Sept 13,
6:30pm - Let's get together and write code!
Message-ID: <9EBA63F7-D385-46CA-AC10-D3A33DB73114@gmail.com>
Let's get together and write code! David Mertens has an amazing graphical REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) for PDL that does plotting, making it extremely easy to see the graphical result of simple programs.
The plan is to add more tutorials to the REPL, and more features including IRC chat. More advanced ideas include creating a plugin that uses the same POD format as http://perltuts.com so the two projects can share tutorials, and a presentation plugin that lets you use the REPL while giving a talk (or maybe give a talk inside the REPL).
Github repository: https://github.com/run4flat/App-Prima-REPL
If that doesn't sound interesting to you, feel free to bring your own code to work on and collaborate with others. If you don't have any code, we can introduce you to some CPAN modules with growing bug lists that need some tender, loving care.
All levels of experience are welcome! We're all users too, and simply installing and using the software will help make it better.
Doug Bell
madcityzen at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From dcmertens.perl at gmail.com Mon Aug 27 21:16:06 2012
From: dcmertens.perl at gmail.com (David Mertens)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:16:06 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] Project Night - Sept 13,
6:30pm - Let's get together and write code!
In-Reply-To: <9EBA63F7-D385-46CA-AC10-D3A33DB73114@gmail.com>
References: <9EBA63F7-D385-46CA-AC10-D3A33DB73114@gmail.com>
Message-ID:
Hey everyone, I wanted to follow-up on what Doug said:
First, one of the goals of the REPL is to make it very easy for
beginners to get their feet wet with Perl. If you know anybody
interested in getting started learning Perl (or are new to Perl
yourself), feel free to invite them along. We'll be able to give
them/you plenty to play with, I'm sure.
Second, the REPL has lots of room for improvement, from the simple to
the difficult, from the obvious to the obscure. If you are an
experienced hacker, there is a tab API to be tested and ironed out
(create new tab, destroy a tab, set default widget for a tab, etc),
especially when it comes to adding the IRC and tutorial components.
The project is badly in need of tests, which can probably be written
by individuals at any skill level. Even if you've only been using Perl
for a couple of months, I could sure use some people trying to break
things and identify bugs in the code. Also, proof-readers and/or
writers for the intro documentation would be a great, great help.
Third, if none of those seem interesting to you, or if you have a pet
project of your own, please bring your own code! I'm excited to see
what others are working on, whether I have time to hack on it or not.
Maybe we'll be able to feature your project in future Project Nights!
So, come one, come all! Let's learn and do some Perl together!
David
---
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan
From andy at petdance.com Tue Aug 28 08:27:00 2012
From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:27:00 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] [Chicago-announce] Project Night - Sept 13,
6:30pm - Let's get together and write code!
In-Reply-To: <9EBA63F7-D385-46CA-AC10-D3A33DB73114@gmail.com>
References: <9EBA63F7-D385-46CA-AC10-D3A33DB73114@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <415E2E28-19CD-4946-BAD7-CCEE4416A18D@petdance.com>
On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:27 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
> Let's get together and write code! David Mertens has an amazing graphical REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) for PDL that does plotting, making it extremely easy to see the graphical result of simple programs.
Would love to, but where?
xoa
--
Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From johnlambrechts at gmail.com Tue Aug 28 09:16:30 2012
From: johnlambrechts at gmail.com (John Lambrechts)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:16:30 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] [Chicago-announce] Project Night - Sept 13,
6:30pm - Let's get together and write code!
In-Reply-To: <415E2E28-19CD-4946-BAD7-CCEE4416A18D@petdance.com>
References: <9EBA63F7-D385-46CA-AC10-D3A33DB73114@gmail.com>
<415E2E28-19CD-4946-BAD7-CCEE4416A18D@petdance.com>
Message-ID:
New member here, I'll be coming.
John
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Andy Lester wrote:
>
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:27 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
>
> Let's get together and write code! David Mertens has an amazing graphical
> REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) for PDL that does plotting, making it extremely
> easy to see the graphical result of simple programs.
>
>
> Would love to, but where?
>
> xoa
>
> --
> Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
>
--
John Lambrechts
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From madcityzen at gmail.com Tue Aug 28 09:53:39 2012
From: madcityzen at gmail.com (Doug Bell)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:53:39 -0500
Subject: [Chicago-talk] [Chicago-announce] Project Night - Sept 13,
6:30pm - Let's get together and write code!
In-Reply-To: <415E2E28-19CD-4946-BAD7-CCEE4416A18D@petdance.com>
References: <9EBA63F7-D385-46CA-AC10-D3A33DB73114@gmail.com>
<415E2E28-19CD-4946-BAD7-CCEE4416A18D@petdance.com>
Message-ID: <3772006758421667010@unknownmsgid>
That was a grievous oversight. Here's the Meetup link:
http://www.meetup.com/Windy-City-Perl-mongers-Meetup/events/79680292/
Right now the venue for these is the normal, 540 W Madison venue. However,
the lack of proper Internet is probably going to be a bigger problem, so
does anyone has a place we can meet with wifi? The tethering on phones is
only going to get us so far. I will also dig up my notes on the co-working
places to see their rates.
If you are interested in helpinh with App-Prima-REPL, it would be best to
clone the repo beforehand.
On Aug 28, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Andy Lester wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:27 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
Let's get together and write code! David Mertens has an amazing graphical
REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) for PDL that does plotting, making it extremely
easy to see the graphical result of simple programs.
Would love to, but where?
xoa
--
Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: