Sotomayor wins 3 GOP senators' support

SUPREME COURT

Paul Kane, Washington Post

Published 4:00 am, Saturday, July 18, 2009

Photo: Win McNamee, Getty Images

Image 1of/1

Caption

Close

Image 1 of 1

WASHINGTON - JULY 15: Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor smiles as she arrives for the third day of confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee July 15, 2009 in Washington, DC. Sotomayor faces a day of questioning from Senators on the committee and also a closed session. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) less

WASHINGTON - JULY 15: Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor smiles as she arrives for the third day of confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee July 15, 2009 in Washington, DC. ... more

Photo: Win McNamee, Getty Images

Sotomayor wins 3 GOP senators' support

1 / 1

Back to Gallery

Three Senate Republicans endorsed Judge Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court on Friday, giving increased momentum to securing President Obama's choice a place on the high court by early August.

Florida Sen. Mel Martinez, former chairman of the Republican National Committee, joined veteran Sens. Richard Lugar of Indiana and Olympia Snowe of Maine in support of the first Latina nominated to the Supreme Court. The senators dismissed allegations from some of their GOP colleagues, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., that Sotomayor had shown herself to be a partial jurist because of speeches in which she said a "wise Latina" could be more likely to make better rulings than a white male judge.

President Trump addresses nation after mass shooting at Florida SchoolWhite House

"Judge Sotomayor is knowledgeable of the law, would be a fair and impartial judge, and seems to have a good understanding of the limited role the judiciary plays in our democracy," Martinez said in a statement.

None of the endorsements was particularly surprising; instead, the significance came through Martinez's and Lugar's standing. Lugar is the Senate's senior Republican, first elected in 1976, and he has long been a leader of the Foreign Relations Committee, while Martinez is the only Latino Republican in the Senate.

Snowe said Sotomayor "appears neither rigid nor dogmatic in her approach to the essential task of constitutional interpretation."

After completing four days of hearings Thursday, the Judiciary Committee is expected to meet Tuesday to begin its consideration of Sotomayor. A formal vote on the committee's recommendation to the Senate is expected July 28, and the final confirmation vote is expected shortly thereafter. Republicans do not expect to mount a filibuster effort so, barring a surprise development, Sotomayor should be easily confirmed, because the Democratic caucus holds 60 senators, who are all almost certain vote for her.

The GOP support for Sotomayor comes amid a continuing debate among Republican political strategists over her nomination. Some, including media strategist Mike Murphy, have cautioned that mounting a large battle over the first Latina nominee to the court could further alienate Latino voters, more than two-thirds of whom supported Obama over Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in November.

Others, including former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed, have urged opposition to Sotomayor as a way to rally the conservative base behind Republicans, particularly on gun rights issues.

Some candidates for other offices used Thursday's conclusion of her confirmation hearings as an opportunity to appeal to Latino voters. Christopher Christie, the Republican nominee for New Jersey governor, quickly announced his support. But McConnell, who had hinted at his opposition in Senate floor speeches leading up to the hearings, issued a harsh verdict. He said her previous speeches were a more important barometer of her future rulings than what she told the Judiciary Committee.

"In her writings and in her speeches, Judge Sotomayor has repeatedly stated that a judge's personal experiences affect judicial outcomes. She has said her experiences will affect the facts that she chooses to see as a judge. ... Taken together, these statements suggest not just a sense that impartiality is not possible, but that it's not even worth the effort," McConnell said in a statement.