- It's about radiation levels, and what's the acceptable limit.
- It's regulated of the FCC, not the EPA or the CBS who normally takes care of health concerns.
- The FCC are staffed by former members of telecom industry. - That's a fox guarding the hen house.
- The tested limits are way out of whack.
- Other countries have banned and outlawed wireless, and also in some schools in CA.
- 20 Million dollar study PROVED conclusively that there were carcinogen effects
- If you read the fine print with any cell phones they mention this but who reads the fine print with cells phones.
- We need to do more testing of 5G effects"

I encourage everybody to oppose this legislation, and just really try to honor our (Article 4 Section 51) responsibilities as representatives of the people.

Carcinogen: A carcinogen is any substance, radionuclide, or radiation that promotes carcinogenesis, the formation of cancer. This may be due to the ability to damage the genome or to the disruption of cellular metabolic processes.

Corporations are protected against harming the public when our health "should" be the first concern not corporations.

So they want to increase the Hz 7/8 times when cell phones in the 90's were already found to promote cancer but now we have a "need" for this....

Seems more like an outside push vs. need. More than likely Bill Clinton & congressmen/women were paid privately to allow this 20-year-old bill to be passed. Something to the effect of Telecommunications companies can't be sued.

Perhaps the concept was to help "exploration into technology", as that is truly the blanket for nasa, however, to put a completely broad iron clade/broad stroke brushstroke "with" actual policy most certainly don't reflect ANY checks/balance in any way.

The telecom did studies to "prove" it wasn't harmful low balling the actual threshold of accountability before damaging the cells in our bodies.

Just like tobacco companies did the same providing their own "safety studies" buying time and adding 20 more years to sell their cigarettes and get more generations addicted before even "having" to EVEN "label" the effects to the public - 40 years after it's been in the commercial markets.

Our elected officials do NOT represent us since they allow this to happen.