I'm getting crappy LAN rates with my TULIP-esque card with this Love. It works fine on Redeeman, but I can't get over 60KB/s on my own LAN with this release! WTF. Every other computer seems fine._________________I was a Gangster for Capitalism, by Major General Smedley Butler.

drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c: In function `add_to_buf_pcf8574':
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:137: error: structure has no member named `c'
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c: In function `add_to_buf_haup':
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:170: error: structure has no member named `c'
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c: In function `add_to_buf_pixelview':
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:203: error: structure has no member named `c'
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:212: error: invalid type argument of `unary *'
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:212: error: `b' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:212: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:212: error: for each function it appears in.)
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c: In function `add_to_buf_pv951':
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:223: error: structure has no member named `c'
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c: In function `add_to_buf_knc1':
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:248: error: structure has no member named `c'

It seems to me that the "c"s should be "client" and I dunno what to do about line 212..

Ok if someone tries to apply that patch directly u may get all the hunks failed.. its due to some whitespace problem..

So while patching use the command

Code:

patch -p1 -l

and it'll work..

I got this from EvilDarkArchon from the irc..

Bye,
Jazz_________________In 2010, M$ Windows will be a quantum processing emulation layer for a 128-bit mod of a 64-bit hack of a 32-bit patch to a 16-bit GUI for an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor from a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition.

this snippet is repeated endlessly until i disconnect the drive. apart from that, the kernel runs fine. other kernels (2.6.5-love4, 2.6.6 gentoo development-sources) run fine.
anybody experiencing the same problems? or knows how to fix this?
thx

I am happy to report that I am up and runing with this version using 4k stack thanks to nvidia for updating there driver.

In the process of this I found that (on my system atleast) 4k stacks and preempt are verry broken when used to gether, during boot my modules would dump all over, and eventually hang. 8k stacks and preempt worked fine tho.

At any rate thax OneofOne, andother fine job _________________The terrible thing about hell is that when you're there you can't even tell as you move through this life you love so you could be there and not even know

Lol, 4k stacks and preeempt dont work for me too.. i was getting these kernel page fault message while trying to anything heavy.. finally i thought it might be worth a try to disable the 4k stacks, and what do ya know..

The bugger was the problem all is good now..

Bye,
Jazz_________________In 2010, M$ Windows will be a quantum processing emulation layer for a 128-bit mod of a 64-bit hack of a 32-bit patch to a 16-bit GUI for an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor from a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition.

I´ve made this diff and for me it works so far - no more slow adsl-connection - but maybe it works not for you

EDIT: as mentioned by jazz use this switch for the patch to apply cleanly

Code:

patch -p1 -l

Code:

....snip...

Very newbie-ish question:
How exactly do I apply this patch? Do I copy and paste the above code into a file and then run "patch -p1 -l filename"? Does the file have to be placed in a particular location?

Very newbie-ish question:
How exactly do I apply this patch? Do I copy and paste the above code into a file and then run "patch -p1 -l filename"? Does the file have to be placed in a particular location?

Thanks in advance.

more or less right.

Copy the code to a file (net.patch for example)

then cd to the kernel source (/usr/src/2.6.7-love5 for example)

then to apply the patch:

Code:

patch -p1 -l < /path/to/net.patch

That's it - watch the output, in case you get any rejects and the like, if it went smoothly, recompile the kernel, mount /boot, copy the new bzImage over, reboot and bask in the glory of full network speed.

If you are trying a new patch, you may also want to try the option --dry-run, like this:

Code:

patch -p1 -l --dry-run < /path/to/net.patch

This works a bit like the -p option in emerge, it will not actually apply the patch but will give the output as if it did.

If you are happy with the output, remove the --dry-run option and apply it for real.

Hello,
I noticed that in this version the SCSI Advansys drivers are missing yet the driver files are there!
Is this a love-sources problem? Or Vanilla/MM problem?
Please get the AdvanSys SCSI drivers back.
Thank you.