Comments on: Speaking of the BBC’s X-Creatureshttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/x-creatures/
for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and MoreTue, 31 Mar 2015 01:31:16 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1By: springheeledjackhttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/x-creatures/comment-page-1/#comment-16486
Thu, 03 Aug 2006 02:47:08 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/speaking-of-the-bbcs-x-creatures/#comment-16486airforce 47 sums it up: photos and film are not going to make or break the case for BF or any other cryptid…it will only rile up the debate. With technology getting as good as it is, it is going to get harder and harder to tell real from faked (though the Patterson footage is the real deal…from everything everyone has had to say…there are too many factors that would have looked different if it had been a fake…and if it is a fake, show me the original suit that matches the critter on the footage so that we can see for “real” what a fake it is).

I am getting off on a tangent, but we are going to have to have a mass encounter with the critters, capture one, or invite one to the 11 0’clock news to get the real goods and settle the bet between us and the “pseudo-skeptics.”

]]>By: Sky Kinghttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/x-creatures/comment-page-1/#comment-16485
Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:37:06 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/speaking-of-the-bbcs-x-creatures/#comment-16485airforce47, if the film is genuine, then it is prima facie evidence of the existence of the species.

Or at least the genus!

]]>By: airforce47http://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/x-creatures/comment-page-1/#comment-16484
Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:02:57 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/speaking-of-the-bbcs-x-creatures/#comment-16484The P & G Film has been studied frame by frame by the late Dr. Krantz and many others. They repeatedly point to the movement of the muscles underneath the fur and the fluid style of the walk. They believe the film to be genuine.

I’ve got a background in photography which includes the type of camera used to make the film. Hoaxing the film would’ve been very difficult. I side with the scientists who’ve reviewed it. The film is most likely genuine but lacks sufficient detail to be a reliable indicator of the existence of the species.

Please remember that even very good pictures, film or video won’t get the species recognized. However, they will spark debate and might bring about serious interest if proven to be genuine. Keep your cameras handy.

Larry Lesh

]]>By: Freelancerhttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/x-creatures/comment-page-1/#comment-16483
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:28:40 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/speaking-of-the-bbcs-x-creatures/#comment-16483I don’t understand how these so-called special effects experts can study the P/G film and still be so far off the mark.

(1) “Patty” is almost black & they always make a suit with medium brown hair on it.
(2) They almost always make a suit with a long moustache, which “Patty” doesn’t have.
(3) “Patty” has basically no forehead like we have & apes don’t.
(4) The so-called experts are using modern day special effects technology in these attempts & the P/G film is nearly 39 years old.

The two things about the P/G film that convince me it’s not a hoax are the fact that there is no human-like forehead & in the M.K. Davis enhancement of the film, the creature apparently blinks its eyes. If they had somehow elevated the mask portion of the suit to hide the forehead of the person wearing it, the person’s eyes would be significantly lower than the eye holes in the mask.

]]>By: sausage1http://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/x-creatures/comment-page-1/#comment-16482
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:20:04 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/speaking-of-the-bbcs-x-creatures/#comment-16482No, I am sure they said that the recreation ‘proved’ Patty was hoaxed. The presenter Chris Packham, is actully a very good naturalist and broadcaster, but he was way off the mark on this. It looks like someone on their way to a fancy dress party!

Interestingly, Packham went to Malaysia in this programme, and seemed open minded about the existence of an undiscovered creature there. He said he considered the chances of Orang Pendek being real to be much greater than the chances of finding Sasquatch or Yeti, so he is not totally closed to the possibilities.

PS tell Man U to keep their hands of Carrick!

]]>By: English Boyhttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/x-creatures/comment-page-1/#comment-16481
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:59:15 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/speaking-of-the-bbcs-x-creatures/#comment-16481im sure the bbc if this the only bbc i know said that it was proven that it was not a hoax i cant remember i was only young and turned channel over to watch Manchester United
]]>By: dewhursthttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/x-creatures/comment-page-1/#comment-16480
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:13:09 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/speaking-of-the-bbcs-x-creatures/#comment-16480As someone has said before-Patty looks like a man in a suit-Until you see a man in a suit.It then becomes obvious that the PGF is something special.
]]>By: shadowparkshttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/x-creatures/comment-page-1/#comment-16479
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 07:48:39 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/speaking-of-the-bbcs-x-creatures/#comment-16479muscle definition is the key to the Patterson film. You can tell that the BBC version is a man in a suit. The patterson film is with out a doubt, genuine. I’ve never seen one, but after watching the Patterson film, one can not help but feel that they are witnessing a real live unknown creature.
]]>By: tugboatwahttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/x-creatures/comment-page-1/#comment-16478
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:48:34 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/speaking-of-the-bbcs-x-creatures/#comment-16478Appears to me this sentence – “Said “recreation” was filmed for the BBC’s X-Creatures show that was broadcast in 1998,” would be more appropriate if the first word had the “i” missing.
]]>By: sasquatchhttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/x-creatures/comment-page-1/#comment-16477
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 03:57:29 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/speaking-of-the-bbcs-x-creatures/#comment-16477Nice borrow from the much beleagured BFRO. They have done some great stufff.
]]>