Defending the Christian faith and promoting its wisdom against the secular and religious challenges of our day.

Friday, October 2, 2015

IT IS RATIONAL TO BELIEVE IN GOD: THE CASE OF MORALITY

If the virtuous life and morality are not based on God, they
must be based on something else. Here are the only other conceivable choices:

MORALITY BASED UPON OBJECTIVE MORAL LAW. In the same way
that we have to conform to gravity and not jump off buildings, we have to also
conform to moral law so that we do not injure ourselves or others. However, it
does not seem that the concept of an objective moral law is sustainable without
the concept of God:

The analogy doesn’t hold
up. We can easily bypass the effects of gravity by boarding a plane or
even by bungee jumping. Why then shouldn’t we also do an end-run around
the moral laws? In contrast to gravity, moral law would require an
Enforcer.

There are no sufficient
reasons to adhere to an impersonal moral law. If our conscience bothers us,
we can simply take a drug or go live in a culture where our aberrant
behavior is acceptable.

Even if an impersonal
moral law is adequate, we would then have to explain where this
intricately fine-tuned law came from and why it is universal and immutable
in this universe of molecules-in-motion. We would also have to explain why
we experience it in the way we do with guilt and shame, as if we had violated
more than an impersonal law.

MORALITY BASED ON PRAGMATISM – THE BENEFITS. If morality is
not justified by higher principles, then it can only be justified by lower ones
– how living the virtuous life beneficially impacts us. We live virtuously
because of the psychological and physical payoffs. However, this rationale is
clearly inadequate. If pragmatism is the bottom line – the ultimate reason for
our choices – then pragmatism can also justify all forms of non-virtuous
behavior. Lying to get a promotion will yield positive results for years.

Many believe in God for strictly personal reasons. However,
it is also rational to believe in God. Even some atheists will admit morality fails
without God:

Arthur Leff, atheist, Duke School of Law, admitted:

“The so-called death of
God wasn’t just His funeral, but was the elimination of any coherent
ethical or legal system…As it stands now, everything is up for
grabs…Napalming babies is bad, starving the poor wicked, buying and
selling people is depraved—but, ‘Sez who?’ God help us.”

The atheist Max Hocutt similarly acknowledged:

“To me (the non-existence
of God) means that there is no absolute morality, that moralities are sets
of social conventions devised by humans to satisfy their needs…If there
were a morality written up in the sky somewhere but no God to enforce it,
I see no good reason why anyone should pay it any heed.” (Understanding the Times)