"Global temperature is rapidly approaching the 1.5°C Paris target. In this study, we find that in the absence of external cooling influences, such as volcanic eruptions, the midpoint of the spread of temperature projections exceeds the 1.5°C target before 2029, based on temperatures relative to 1850–1900..."Trajectories toward the 1.5°C Paris target: Modulation by the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillationhttps://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017GL073480

...Statistical analysis is something they don't seem to understand. This is based on logic. Why does this matter ? Because itn uses logic to falsify science.

This leads us to consider the concept of the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis states what we would expect purely from chance alone, in the absence of anything interesting (such as a trend) in the data.

..This demonstrates that from the beginning that logic is used to void any meaning in the data collected. This means that when data collected, if it is argued that nothing is has changed then it will be similar to the previous data collected. Then we have a null hypothesis. ..Then if the new data varies from the previously collected data then the null hypothesis has been falsified. What does this mean ? That itn can now falsify logic. He can correct this post and falsify what a hypothesis and a null hypothesis are. He can also falsify that when logic is used to consider data that has been collected that this is not science. He will argue that when logic is used to consider how data and physical events are considered that it is not science...To many baseball fans they would want to know if all of the stats that they keep in baseball and analyze ad nauseum are just random numbers. In sports such information is called metrics.met·rics[ˈmetriks]NOUNthe use or study of poetic meters; prosody.a method of measuring something, or the results obtained from this."the report provides various metrics at the class and method level"

I'm trying to picture you resting your "case" or more accurately, lack of case. When you have to rely upon youtube videos for your knowledge you seem to leap over the overwhelming number of videos by much greater experts saying the exact opposite.

... why is renowned climate scientist 'Spaceshot76' comparing Global Land Ocean temperatures to earlier measurements for the Northern Hemisphere, intending to prove a point by illustrating a difference - when coincidentally there doesn't seem to be much difference for the period that can be compared?

Spaceshot76 - not you is it, didn't you use to boast about working with rockets or something?Either way it's tripe 0/10. Fail.

"Soon's funding is highly unusual at the Smithsonian in its association with private interests. It included at least $230,000 from the Charles G. Koch Foundation which is associated with the oil industry and $469,560 from the Southern Company which uses coal to generate electricity. Exxon Mobil and the American Petroleum Institute also provided funding, which was later replaced by anonymous donors through the Donors Trust, a donor-advised fund that offers anonymity to clients who do not wish to make their donations public. The latter was identified by a 2013 Drexel University study as the largest single provider of money to political efforts to fight climate-change policy. A 2008 contract agreed to by the CfA required the institute to notify the Southern Company before disclosing that Southern had provided funding, and both the CfA and Willie Soon to provide Southern with advance copies of any publications "for comment and input", though the company could not block publications or require changes."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willie_Soon#2015:_Allegations_of_disclosure_violations

New Age philosophy aside, he rests his case on the Florida real estate market, they wouldn't sell you a house if it was going to flood ...

"A state built on real estate speculation, whose chief attribute was proximity to the water, now faces a whole new problem: There's not enough land, high enough above the water, for its residents to pull back from the rising seas. By the end of the century, database company Zillow Group estimates, almost a half-million Miami homes could be—literally—underwater. That's more than anywhere else in the country.

In a working paper posted this month on Social Science Research Network, an online repository of academic research, professors from the University of Colorado at Boulder and Pennsylvania State University found that homes exposed to sea-level rise sell at a 7 percent discount compared with equivalent but unexposed properties.

"This discount has grown over time," the authors wrote, "and is driven by sophisticated buyers and communities worried about global warming." Properties along both coasts of Florida are at risk of sea-level rise, mapping in the paper shows.

Marla Martin, a spokeswoman for Florida Realtors, which represents the state's real estate agents, wasn't available to comment ...

... The region's frothy home values, Slap said, have persisted because of what he calls "a dirty little secret" among real estate agents, who are aware of the flood risks but face no requirement to disclose them to buyers."

James___ wrote:This is based on logic. Why does this matter ? Because itn uses logic to falsify science.

Logic does not falsify science. Neither can be falsified.

James___ wrote:

This leads us to consider the concept of the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis states what we would expect purely from chance alone, in the absence of anything interesting (such as a trend) in the data.

Not the definition of the null hypothesis...This demonstrates that from the beginning that logic is used to void any meaning in the data collected.[/quote]WRONG. Math is.

James___ wrote:This means that when data collected, if it is argued that nothing is has changed then it will be similar to the previous data collected.

It means nothing.

James___ wrote:Then we have a null hypothesis.

Not the definition of the null hypothesis.

James___ wrote:.Then if the new data varies from the previously collected data then the null hypothesis has been falsified.

You can't falsify a hypothesis. You can only falsify a theory, if the theory is a theory of science. A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around.

James___ wrote:What does this mean ?

That you have no idea what you're talking about.

James___ wrote:that itn can now falsify logic.

You cannot falsify logic.

James___ wrote:He can correct this post and falsify what a hypothesis and a null hypothesis are.

You can't falsify a hypothesis.

James___ wrote:He can also falsify that when logic is used to consider data that has been collected that this is not science.

Data must meet certain criteria, which I've listed, to be considered valid data. Science is not data, even if the data is valid. Data is the result of an observation.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories, not data.

James___ wrote:He will argue that when logic is used to consider how data and physical events are considered that it is not science.

Logic is not used here. Philosophy is. Science is not data. It is a set of falsifiable theories.

James___ wrote:.To many baseball fans they would want to know if all of the stats that they keep in baseball and analyze ad nauseum are just random numbers. In sports such information is called metrics....deleted redundancy...

After you peruse these (which of course you have no intentions of doing) you may go out onto your protest march to murder one third of the poor people of the globe.

Holy Link War!

To monckton especially:

Present your argument (if you have any). Endless Holy Links are summarily discarded. It is the sign of weak thinking. Learn to think for yourself and make your own arguments instead of stealing the arguments of others.

James___ wrote:This is based on logic. Why does this matter ? Because itn uses logic to falsify science.

Logic does not falsify science. Neither can be falsified.

James___ wrote:

This leads us to consider the concept of the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis states what we would expect purely from chance alone, in the absence of anything interesting (such as a trend) in the data.

Not the definition of the null hypothesis...This demonstrates that from the beginning that logic is used to void any meaning in the data collected.

WRONG. Math is.

James___ wrote:This means that when data collected, if it is argued that nothing is has changed then it will be similar to the previous data collected.

It means nothing.

James___ wrote:Then we have a null hypothesis.

Not the definition of the null hypothesis.

James___ wrote:.Then if the new data varies from the previously collected data then the null hypothesis has been falsified.

You can't falsify a hypothesis. You can only falsify a theory, if the theory is a theory of science. A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around.

James___ wrote:What does this mean ?

That you have no idea what you're talking about.

James___ wrote:that itn can now falsify logic.

You cannot falsify logic.

James___ wrote:He can correct this post and falsify what a hypothesis and a null hypothesis are.

You can't falsify a hypothesis.

James___ wrote:He can also falsify that when logic is used to consider data that has been collected that this is not science.

Data must meet certain criteria, which I've listed, to be considered valid data. Science is not data, even if the data is valid. Data is the result of an observation.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories, not data.

James___ wrote:He will argue that when logic is used to consider how data and physical events are considered that it is not science.

Logic is not used here. Philosophy is. Science is not data. It is a set of falsifiable theories.

James___ wrote:.To many baseball fans they would want to know if all of the stats that they keep in baseball and analyze ad nauseum are just random numbers. In sports such information is called metrics....deleted redundancy...

Baseball stats are not science.

You DO like to make shit up.[/quote]

...More buzzwords and circular arguments ad nauseum. Mustn't have an opinion of his own. Just a HATER. I think it's funny that litesong got banned for posting about climate change while itn is only disruptive...Branner must be a very close friend of itn's which makes the point of this forum moot. Either that or itn needs a boyfriend and he's in here henpecking his boyfriends like a love starved woman. His behavior is completely irrational unless he's looking for a mate.

James___ wrote:...More buzzwords and circular arguments ad nauseum. Mustn't have an opinion of his own. Just a HATER. I think it's funny that litesong got banned for posting about climate change while itn is only disruptive...Branner must be a very close friend of itn's which makes the point of this forum moot. Either that or itn needs a boyfriend and he's in here henpecking his boyfriends like a love starved woman. His behavior is completely irrational unless he's looking for a mate.

James, by this time I would think that you'd be less bothered by Nightmare after he continues to show that he doesn't even know what statistical analysis is let alone have the ability to provide it.

James___ wrote:...More buzzwords and circular arguments ad nauseum. Mustn't have an opinion of his own. Just a HATER. I think it's funny that litesong got banned for posting about climate change while itn is only disruptive...Branner must be a very close friend of itn's which makes the point of this forum moot. Either that or itn needs a boyfriend and he's in here henpecking his boyfriends like a love starved woman. His behavior is completely irrational unless he's looking for a mate.

James, by this time I would think that you'd be less bothered by Nightmare after he continues to show that he doesn't even know what statistical analysis is let alone have the ability to provide it.

James___ wrote:...More buzzwords and circular arguments ad nauseum. Mustn't have an opinion of his own. Just a HATER. I think it's funny that litesong got banned for posting about climate change while itn is only disruptive...Branner must be a very close friend of itn's which makes the point of this forum moot. Either that or itn needs a boyfriend and he's in here henpecking his boyfriends like a love starved woman. His behavior is completely irrational unless he's looking for a mate.

James, by this time I would think that you'd be less bothered by Nightmare after he continues to show that he doesn't even know what statistical analysis is let alone have the ability to provide it.

...Wake,.Ever watch "A Christmas Story" ? The kid said Red Rider BB Gun and thought the class should love him for it ? That's itn's logic. He posted something and we should praise him for it. Just a legend in his own mind.

After you peruse these (which of course you have no intentions of doing) you may go out onto your protest march to murder one third of the poor people of the globe.

Wake up. The world's poor would very much love to enjoy electricity, produced in most countries by burning coal, air conditioning, a motor scooter, much less a personal car, all of which we westerners take for granted.

The world's poor could care less about your grandiose pretenses to *save the world* by imposing carbon taxes, raising the price of all energy sources, and otherwise screwing everything up with Eco-Hypocrisy and fraud called *science*.

Water vapor is THE dominant greenhouse gas, by far. Learn that and stop squealing like a Hillary. (wink, nudge)

You'd think that he could take at least one step back and look at his own postings.

He has some things correct but it appears to be almost by accident. In another posting he argues that heat as we know it on Earth isn't light - it is infrared light..............

Compositional error, Wake. Why do you insist on going this direction? I thought you knew better.

Heat can be by conduction, convection, or radiance. It does not have to be light at all. If it IS radiance, it is infrared light (or lower).

I was just thinking of your insane ignorance which you love so much to spread. Last year when I said that the California destructive fires occurred in such a manner that it had to be a firebug. That fires do not start going up-wind.

What did you say? That it was from the PG&E power lines. In another instance you, from Seattle were telling ME who live here that PG&E transformers for underground power lines were also underground. I got a good laugh over that as I bicycled past the surface transformer stations for underground power lines.

This year again we had fires starting; and again going upwind. This time they caught the firebug setting them as I noted these fires had to be set by. It was an illegal alien caught red handed.

Why don't you tell us a whole lot more about things you can't even conceive of but are more than willing to stick your stupidity into?

What this world needs is a whole lot less ignorance of the type you represent - where people with no knowledge like to pretend they have more than the world's most profound scientists. From your positition of importance in an airplane hanger.

After you peruse these (which of course you have no intentions of doing) you may go out onto your protest march to murder one third of the poor people of the globe.

Wake up. The world's poor would very much love to enjoy electricity, produced in most countries by burning coal, air conditioning, a motor scooter, much less a personal car, all of which we westerners take for granted.

The world's poor could care less about your grandiose pretenses to *save the world* by imposing carbon taxes, raising the price of all energy sources, and otherwise screwing everything up with Eco-Hypocrisy and fraud called *science*.

Water vapor is THE dominant greenhouse gas, by far. Learn that and stop squealing like a Hillary. (wink, nudge)

Counterfeit Monckton who is such a coward and a slimebag that he would steal the good name of someone would be perfectly happy murdering world population by the millions. That is the leftist take on things.

Even this morning my wife showed me an article about central African weather patterns which bounce from drought to heavy rains and the article said that they had to get ready for climate change.

There is nothing these crumbs wouldn't hope to do than scare the third world. I would really love to run across this "monckton" poster and I can absolutely guarantee you that he would never again post under the name of someone else.

You'd think that he could take at least one step back and look at his own postings.

He has some things correct but it appears to be almost by accident. In another posting he argues that heat as we know it on Earth isn't light - it is infrared light..............

Compositional error, Wake. Why do you insist on going this direction? I thought you knew better.

Heat can be by conduction, convection, or radiance. It does not have to be light at all. If it IS radiance, it is infrared light (or lower).

I was just thinking of your insane ignorance which you love so much to spread. Last year when I said that the California destructive fires occurred in such a manner that it had to be a firebug. That fires do not start going up-wind.

What did you say? That it was from the PG&E power lines.

The Sonoma fires WERE from the PG&E power lines.

Wake wrote:In another instance you, from Seattle were telling ME who live here that PG&E transformers for underground power lines were also underground.

Why do you insist on lying, Wake? I never said any such thing.

Wake wrote:I got a good laugh over that as I bicycled past the surface transformer stations for underground power lines.

Hope you enjoyed your laugh.

Wake wrote:This year again we had fires starting; and again going upwind. This time they caught the firebug setting them as I noted these fires had to be set by. It was an illegal alien caught red handed.

Good. Hope they nail his hide to the wall.

Wake wrote:Why don't you tell us a whole lot more about things you can't even conceive of but are more than willing to stick your stupidity into?

What this world needs is a whole lot less ignorance of the type you represent - where people with no knowledge like to pretend they have more than the world's most profound scientists.

Science isn't scientists, Wake. Science is set of falsifiable theories. Consensus and supporting evidence aren't used in science.

You'd think that he could take at least one step back and look at his own postings.

He has some things correct but it appears to be almost by accident. In another posting he argues that heat as we know it on Earth isn't light - it is infrared light..............

Compositional error, Wake. Why do you insist on going this direction? I thought you knew better.

Heat can be by conduction, convection, or radiance. It does not have to be light at all. If it IS radiance, it is infrared light (or lower).

I was just thinking of your insane ignorance which you love so much to spread. Last year when I said that the California destructive fires occurred in such a manner that it had to be a firebug. That fires do not start going up-wind.

What did you say? That it was from the PG&E power lines.

The Sonoma fires WERE from the PG&E power lines.

Wake wrote:In another instance you, from Seattle were telling ME who live here that PG&E transformers for underground power lines were also underground.

Why do you insist on lying, Wake? I never said any such thing.

Wake wrote:I got a good laugh over that as I bicycled past the surface transformer stations for underground power lines.

Hope you enjoyed your laugh.

Wake wrote:This year again we had fires starting; and again going upwind. This time they caught the firebug setting them as I noted these fires had to be set by. It was an illegal alien caught red handed.

Good. Hope they nail his hide to the wall.

Wake wrote:Why don't you tell us a whole lot more about things you can't even conceive of but are more than willing to stick your stupidity into?

What this world needs is a whole lot less ignorance of the type you represent - where people with no knowledge like to pretend they have more than the world's most profound scientists.

Science isn't scientists, Wake. Science is set of falsifiable theories. Consensus and supporting evidence aren't used in science.

The Sonoma fires occurred EXACTLY as these did: starting from the south and starting at a driving time from one to the other. Going upwind and at equal distances. But you're too stupid to be able to figure that out.

PG&E was nothing more than a source of insurance to cover the costs of rebuilding. Your kind of plan.

You grow funnier by the minute since after you said that when they plant underground utility lines that the transformers are underground as well that I actually took pictures of those transformer stations above ground and sealed from molestation.

Your pouring out one lie after the other gets better all the time. You know so little about real science that it is preposterous for you to so much as give an opinion let along your stupid hard and fast rules.

You'd think that he could take at least one step back and look at his own postings.

He has some things correct but it appears to be almost by accident. In another posting he argues that heat as we know it on Earth isn't light - it is infrared light..............

Compositional error, Wake. Why do you insist on going this direction? I thought you knew better.

Heat can be by conduction, convection, or radiance. It does not have to be light at all. If it IS radiance, it is infrared light (or lower).

I was just thinking of your insane ignorance which you love so much to spread. Last year when I said that the California destructive fires occurred in such a manner that it had to be a firebug. That fires do not start going up-wind.

What did you say? That it was from the PG&E power lines.

The Sonoma fires WERE from the PG&E power lines.

Wake wrote:In another instance you, from Seattle were telling ME who live here that PG&E transformers for underground power lines were also underground.

Why do you insist on lying, Wake? I never said any such thing.

Wake wrote:I got a good laugh over that as I bicycled past the surface transformer stations for underground power lines.

Hope you enjoyed your laugh.

Wake wrote:This year again we had fires starting; and again going upwind. This time they caught the firebug setting them as I noted these fires had to be set by. It was an illegal alien caught red handed.

Good. Hope they nail his hide to the wall.

Wake wrote:Why don't you tell us a whole lot more about things you can't even conceive of but are more than willing to stick your stupidity into?

What this world needs is a whole lot less ignorance of the type you represent - where people with no knowledge like to pretend they have more than the world's most profound scientists.

Science isn't scientists, Wake. Science is set of falsifiable theories. Consensus and supporting evidence aren't used in science.

The Sonoma fires occurred EXACTLY as these did: starting from the south and starting at a driving time from one to the other. Going upwind and at equal distances. But you're too stupid to be able to figure that out.

Nope. They started from downed PG&E lines that were not well maintained.

Wake wrote:PG&E was nothing more than a source of insurance to cover the costs of rebuilding. Your kind of plan.

Nonsense statement.

Wake wrote:You grow funnier by the minute since after you said that when they plant underground utility lines that the transformers are underground as well that I actually took pictures of those transformer stations above ground and sealed from molestation.

Still trying to make this lie?

Wake wrote:Your pouring out one lie after the other gets better all the time.

Inversion fallacy. It is YOU that is lying.

Wake wrote:You know so little about real science that it is preposterous for you to so much as give an opinion let along your stupid hard and fast rules.

Followed by general insults. You still deny science as well as the math, just like any believer in the Church of Global Warming.

You are a dumbass and will never grow out of it. You and monckton are two of a kind.

THEY KILLED ALL THOSE PEOPLE FOR MONEY!

To the Members of the House of Representatives and of the Senate of the United States of America,

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT:

On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.https://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/#/AE

You are a dumbass and will never grow out of it. You and monckton are two of a kind.

THEY KILLED ALL THOSE PEOPLE FOR MONEY!

To the Members of the House of Representatives and of the Senate of the United States of America,

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT:

On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.https://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/#/AE

Only rising.

Hey, look, another of nightmare's buddies with their insanity. You are neither and architect nor engineer. You certainly know nothing about the event surrounding 9/11 nor the total and complete investigation of it.

You are a dumbass and will never grow out of it. You and monckton are two of a kind.

THEY KILLED ALL THOSE PEOPLE FOR MONEY!

To the Members of the House of Representatives and of the Senate of the United States of America,

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT:

On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.https://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/#/AE

Only rising.

Hey, look, another of nightmare's buddies with their insanity. You are neither and architect nor engineer. You certainly know nothing about the event surrounding 9/11 nor the total and complete investigation of it.

As usual, Wake, you are completely out to lunch.

I never argued that explosives were used on the WTC. I argue quite the opposite, in fact.

No further waste of money and time is required research the WTC collapse. All three buildings collapsed due to fire, as all steel lattice construction does when exposed to large uncontrolled fires.

I never argued that explosives were used on the WTC. I argue quite the opposite, in fact.

No further waste of money and time is required research the WTC collapse. All three buildings collapsed due to fire, as all steel lattice construction does when exposed to large uncontrolled fires.

I never said you did. But in a like ignorant and totally stupid manner you're telling us about PG&E power lines when you live in Seattle and the fires occurred in Sonoma County, CA. What sort of fool does that? After saying that when you have underground power lines that transformer facilities are also underground you turned right around and said that you never said that. You are as crackpot as the 9/11ers and their FBI theories. I'd say you weren't playing with a full deck but you don't have any cards at all.