barterer2002 wrote:No, I've got my desktop and my laptop. I generally take my games first thing in the morning on the laptop which doesn't have all the add ons installed and through the day take them on the desktop. As I think the numbers are reversed from what I said, 1/2 to 2/3 of them are on this one with the rest on the laptop not being recorded.

The dice are recorded in a file on your PC. So your desktop will have a separate file than your laptop.The dice recorded are from the turns you have taken on that PC.

So if you are running 2 scripts on 2 computers, you will have different data on both as you are taking different turns on both.

Right, I understood that, that's why I was telling you it wasn't every turn and why I have more attacks that defense (not running the script on laptop)

Okay, you say I complain too much, but lets see... where should I begin?

To get four dice get the same number in a row (any of them) is a one-in-215 four-dice-throw chance

The sample have 231 dice (lets say about 57 groups of four dice).

Line 1, four twos in a row LInes 5 and 6, four fours in a rowLine 8, FIVE sixes in a rowLine 8 and 9 FIVE fives in a row

So, something that should occour once every 215 four-dice-throws happened FOUR times in a 57 four-dice-throws - thats about 6% occourence of an event that have a mere ZERO POINT FIVE percent chance of happening.

While this does not prove the dice "are not random" they surely are something to be investigated.

note that I am not complaining about battle results, I am simply checking out a serie of data and realizing things that were not expected to have occoured once evry five of such samples occoured FOUR times on a single one.

FOUR arrangements of 4-of-a-kind are to be expected to be seen on samples of 1.155 4-dice throws, and yet here we see it on 57 of such

Not to mention two of them were a FIVE in a row - chance for any five of a kind - once in 1295 throws

Okay, you say I complain too much, but lets see... where should I begin?

To get four dice get the same number in a row (any of them) is a one-in-215 four-dice-throw chance

The sample have 231 dice (lets say about 57 groups of four dice).

Line 1, four twos in a row LInes 5 and 6, four fours in a rowLine 8, FIVE sixes in a rowLine 8 and 9 FIVE fives in a row

So, something that should occour once every 215 four-dice-throws happened FOUR times in a 57 four-dice-throws - thats about 6% occourence of an event that have a mere ZERO POINT FIVE percent chance of happening.

While this does not prove the dice "are not random" they surely are something to be investigated.

note that I am not complaining about battle results, I am simply checking out a serie of data and realizing things that were not expected to have occoured once evry five of such samples occoured FOUR times on a single one.

FOUR arrangements of 4-of-a-kind are to be expected to be seen on samples of 1.155 4-dice throws, and yet here we see it on 57 of such

Not to mention two of them were a FIVE in a row - chance for any five of a kind - once in 1295 throws

So, anyone care about it?

Quit complaining. If you know anything about statistics then you would know there is nothing to be shown from 57 dice throws. When you have a sample size of a million plus and your numbers are still around 6% when they should be 0.5%, then you might actually have a case, until then, go read a book about statistics.

Random dice with a 0.5% chance of something happening does not mean that it will happen 0.5% of the time in every sample. In fact, it has a greater than 90% chance of not even really being close to 0.5% in the sample size you are talking about.

A quick question, I saw in the first post you say something about it recording defensive dice and then in later posts it said something about it only recording turns you take with that computer. Does it record defensive dice when I am not there during another players turn? Or does it only record my dice throws from my turns?

A quick question, I saw in the first post you say something about it recording defensive dice and then in later posts it said something about it only recording turns you take with that computer. Does it record defensive dice when I am not there during another players turn? Or does it only record my dice throws from my turns?

yeah, right. So it is a valid argument that you should expect to hit a jackpot everytime you enter a cassino, just because millions of bets are being made there every day?

To me, it would be much more likely to say: you might SEE a few jackpots with a few people if you stay on the cassino long enough. But if you play only once or twice, odds arer YOU wont get any jackpot yourself, no matter how much OTHER people roll.

Here, you say that because OTHER people roll a lot, YOU should get a lot of anomalies.

RADAGA wrote:yeah, right. So it is a valid argument that you should expect to hit a jackpot everytime you enter a cassino, just because millions of bets are being made there every day?

To me, it would be much more likely to say: you might SEE a few jackpots with a few people if you stay on the cassino long enough. But if you play only once or twice, odds arer YOU wont get any jackpot yourself, no matter how much OTHER people roll.

Here, you say that because OTHER people roll a lot, YOU should get a lot of anomalies.

Who need to get back to school?

Lol. It is possible to win 2 jackpots in a casino back to back. I've done it. That doesn't mean that the machines or the system is screwed up. I've seen people win on their first pull and I've seen people never win anything in days. IT"S RANDOM!!!

I haven't used a streak analyzer but I can tell you that my attacking dice have been the sorriest collection of 1s, 2s and 3s in game play over the last couple of days. It really has me reconsidering continuing to play this site.

Okay, now when there IS a tool to show sometimes there are a streakness, and this tool begins to uncover it, you accuse someone of having the trouble to change a script to prove a theory?

Now, that´s either paranoy or denial, imo.

There is no need to tamper the script, one can photoshop the screenshot. But why have this trouble? To create a war where there should be none? I post the things i find not to cause hassle, but to try to show a perceived flaw, in hope it can be fixed, someday.

To spend hours editting each and every screenshot (not to mention making the calculations to tamper it "right" and make ends meet) just to make a point where there should be none woud be sick.

Not to mention I DO have better (and worse:work) things to do with my time.

One question: Does the script count 2-0 win, 2-0 win, 1-1 draw, 2-0 win as 7 consecutive troops defeated? I'd guess he should treat it as 2 streaks (though it's unclear how a script should do that exactly).