> Concepts:
>
> o 1.2 => primer
Can I suggest that the background reading section in the primer include the
Hunter and Davis references from the Concepts doc.
They are increasingly out of place.
The text that introduces them is in a note (section 2.2.1)
[[
See ... a textbook on logical semantics (e.g. [HUNTER]{DAVIS]) for more
information about "model thoery"
]]
or maybe this is or should be covered in the semantics doc.
Jeremy