Blog

Essay About Capital Punishment: Pros and Cons

Capital punishment had been causing and still causes now fierce debate. Reasons "pro" and "con" the capital punishment may be discovered in religious books. Various political and public figures once in a while speak out of both cancellation and application of capital punishment. Essays on capital punishment usually contain the following points:

Reasons of contradictors of capital punishment

1.Judicial errors

Nobody has yet managed to produce a juridical service that operates with no errors. And this, in case capital punishment is administered, implies that unguilty individuals will unavoidably be put to death. Our writing service can offer you a custom paper on this topic.

2. The non-existence of disciplining force on prospective offenders

The assertion of the disciplining force of the prospect of being sentenced to putting to death on an offender is grounded on the idea of an offender based on reason. But just 5-10% of homicides are intentional, and when they are arranged beforehand, they are committed by individuals mentally disabled and under the impact of various external reasons that are not related to considerations of revenge. The other 85-90% of homicides are carried out in state of emotion or pseudoaffect, i.e. the offender is conscious of the results after the criminal act is carried out, thus what is known as the disciplining force is not applied. On top, scientists confirmed that the prospect of a sentence in the shape of capital punishment is not a sense-making reason for an offender and therefore it can not prevent carrying out the criminal act, least of all a maniac, terrorist, etc.

In each essay on capital punishment it is claimed that an individual may consciously carry out a criminal act for what capital punishment is due, in the situation if he/she had lost the desire to continue living and is ready to commit suicide, but is afraid to carry it out him/herself. To be exact, an individual is as though "looking for his/her decease." Followers of this version claim that actually in this situation euthanasia occurs in the narrow meaning of the notion, even in states in which it is prohibited. Contradictors of penalty of death consider that in case capital punishment is canceled, the amount of grave offenses should fall, as a minimum for an amount of latent suicides. Our professional team of authors can write a unique essay about it.

In Great Britain capital punishment was eliminated as a trial from1965 to 1970. At the end of this term, Parliament looked through the data and inferred that the amount of homicides has not increased. After that, capital punishment for homicide was eliminated entirely. Scientific studies have failed to find persuasive proof that capital punishment is a more effectual means of diminishing criminality than the rest of penalties.

3. Capital punishment does not provide the decline of criminality

The death sentence of the criminal creates the false impression that the public "cleared itself" and that the living of the citizens is under the protection. The death sentence is not beneficial to the struggle against the societal grounds of the gravest offenses. Quite the opposite, the air of brutality and cruel callousness among people that is legitimated by the community applying capital punishment, simply designs new preconditions and circumstances for yet more awful and vicious felony. You can find essay writing service cheap online with us and get a good essay.

4. The expenses of capital punishment are less than for life term

It is assumed that the criminal must be executed, as the public, in the situation of life term, will be required to spend money on their allowance. Financial basis must not affect the decision on somebody's life and death. Otherwise, why not take life of the unemployed and the disabled, the allowance of which costs society dearly. Ethical matters must not be decided on the ground of commercial, financial or material reflections. Using our high-quality writing service you will know more about it.

5. Capital punishment does not involve the societal aspects that give rise to criminality

Such issues as moral or scientific can not be decided in a referendum. The question of capital punishment is too complicated and acute, so that it could be resolved without a serious factual basis. In this regard, the discussion of this issue should be completely exempt from emotion and left to experts. Students often ask us ‘do my paper within 24 hours online’ and get an essay well-written.

6. Capital punishment has been applied for hundreds of years, but it has not reduced criminality

Since very old period as capital punishment essays state, lots of states and nations have applied capital punishment, frequently with appalling periodicity and regularity, expecting to intimidate prospective offenders and avoid criminality. But, as the past illustrates, these expectations were for nothing. Violence, becoming the rule in the society, just gave rise to yet more horrible and hideous manifestations of callousness, rage and lust for blood amid people. You can ask ‘grade my paper quickly’ and find our professional service.

7. The death sentence unhumanizes the community

All the main religious doctrines on the planet concentrate on such ethical traits as humanity, sympathy, concern and kind-heartedness. Such moral qualities most obviously differentiate humans from beasts, even the most advanced. Capital punishment as a concept contradicts such ethical norms and has an unhumanizing impact on persons. Unproductivity of the death sentence is not restricted to its unhumanizing effects on the public. It as well turns away the notice of authorities (and citizens) from those measures that are necessary to reach actual outcome in the battle against criminality. Here is an essay about a mental illness that can cause a crime: http://smartwriters.org/blog/bipolar-disorder-essay-is-it-really-dangerous

8. Capital punishment is a sign of the politic and civilizing underdevelopment of people

The great amounts of states on the planet that apply capital punishment are oppressive, dictatorial or economically underdeveloped areas that are accompanied by venal practices, high criminality and other depressing features. Those were the most advanced and free states that were the first to reject capital punishment as the most barbarous and morally wrong penalty. There is a tight and firm connection between high civilizational rank and the non-existence of especially inhuman and brutal penalties like capital punishment, torments and so on.

In lots of areas life term is introduced as the sanction of last resort and alternative to the death sentence. The criminal is held in jail for 10, 20 or more years at the expense of respectable taxpayers. The tragedy of this situation is in the fact that relatives or friends of injured persons of the criminal are invariably among those taxpayers. Thus, instead of legal retribution, they have to pay their own money for the allowance of their loved one’s killer. If you ask ‘do my research paper for me quiclky’, we are here to help you.

2. Capital punishment as an ethical argument

Proponents of this view cite the next reasons in its support: people convicted to life term do not do any work and are alimented for life at the expense of taxes paid by other members of society, including relatives of persons killed by criminals. And no matter how small the sum, extracted for their allowance, is, no matter how insignificant it may become with regard to each inhabitant of the state, a moral problem is on hand. You can read more about death penalty here: http://smartwriters.org/blog/death-penalty-argumentative-essay

3. The right to revenge

Both contradictors and proponents of capital punishment in the debate of its expediency consider only an individual convicted and rather rarely mention the rights of victims. Proponents of capital punishment are considering it in the initial place as the fulfillment of the right to revenge. You can ask ‘proof read my essay within 24 hours’ and have your work perfectly done.

4. Capital punishment as a form of social protection

It was the main explanation for capital punishment for the period of ruling of Joseph Stalin in the Soviet Union. Capital punishment was legally considered primarily as a way of defense of people from anti-social elements. (The uppermost kind of social protection)

Thus, in our capital punishment essay we can state that the death penalty as capital punishment continues to cause bitter quarrel: its opponents put in evidence of the risk of judicial error, infringement of a human right to life and other reasons, and proponents say that grounded on the right of revenge, the penalty is acceptable for slaughterers, and capital punishment confirms the right to life by punishing those who most crudely violate this right.