Description: (Newly Released U.S. State Dept Documentary Proof That Richard Holbrook Gave Radovan Karadzic Immunity & Assassination Attempts on His Life) ->I don’t think these newly released State Dept. papers come anywhere close to answering Dr. Karadzic’s legal concerns
READ THE SECRETS THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT THE RADOVAN KARADZXIC CASE HERE->>>>
THE FIRST CASULTY OF WAR IS TRUTH AND THE TRUTH WILL SET KARADZIC FREE FROM THE HAGUE !!!

(Newly Released U.S. State Dept
Documentary Proof That Richard Holbrook Gave Radovan Karadzic Immunity
& Assassination Attempts on His Life) ->I don’t think these newly
released State Dept. papers come anywhere close to answering Dr.
Karadzic’s legal concerns

United States :

I
don’t think these newly released State Dept. papers come anywhere close
to answering Dr. Karadzic’s legal concerns insofar as whether:

1)
an informal but genuine immunity agreement between the USA &
Radovan Karadzic existed,WE CAN ALL VIEW THE GENUINE OFFICIAL RICHARD
HOLBROOK POSITION AND THAT OF THE ENTIRE BILL CLINTON ADMINISTRATION
WHEN IT CAME TO CUDDLING UP TO WAR CRIMINALS LIKE KLA MEMBER AND LATER
ACCUSED HAGUE WAR CRIMINALS AND AL QAEDA ASSOCIATES SUCH AS.
Hashim-Thaci KLA/UCK Albanian.

COME ON US STATE DEPT, YOU WILL
HAVE TO DO BETTER THAN THIS PAPER TIGER PRESS RELEASE TO CONVINCE THE
EDUCATED AMERICAN PUBLIC THAT HOLBROOK DID NOT MAKE SUCH AN IMMUNITY
AGREEMENT AND W/ DR KARADZIC.

(AND HOW ABOUT YOU <input ... >WESLEY CLARK AND JOHN MCCAIN, WHAT IS YOUR PERSONAL POSITION ON DEALING WITH WAR CRIMINALS IN KOSOVO SENATOR SIR (?)

and,

2)
whether Richard Holbrook and associated U.S. officials at that time
threatened to assassinate Dr. Karadzic and/or make him “disappear” if
he did not comply with immediate demands of the US newly declassified
released State Dept. reports including those Karadzic himself cites at
the Hague court pressed him to immediately withdraw from further
Presidential and all other political public functioning.

In my
estimation there remains an entire courtroom of reasonable doubt
hanging over the question remaining which is still is whether a
Holbrook - Karadzic immunity agreement existed.

I strongly
believe an immunity agreement agreement did in fact to exist when
analyzing details of, Dr. Karadzic’s actions and speech (I MEAN LACK OF
SPEECH) in my chance vacation meetings with him in 2002. I can only
speak as a sociologist.

1) First and foremost, the United
States (for all outward appearances), diplomatically, would not be
foolish enough to get caught with their pants down so to speak in 2009
and risk the United Nations purview accusing them later in 2009 of
being limp on war criminals in 1996. These newly released papers only
give an outward diplomatic appearance of ‘an official U.S. stance,” and
do not tell the whole story of what went on behind the scenes; I found
this out when attending the 2001 UN Preparatory Commission Meetings to
Establish an International Criminal Court.

2) Gary Bass in his
book entitled, “Stay the Hand of Vengeance,” does a precise job of
portraying Richard Holbrook as a man wavering like a weed in the wind
diplomatically between prosecuting war criminals and doing a lot of
backdoor diplomatic dealing with those accused of war crimes informally
out of both public site and diplomatic necessity. Pg. 241 describes
particularly well America’s true position on the matter in saying,

“The
America and European delegations came together to pressure the
Bosnians, a process Sacirbey, then Bosnian’s foreign minister,
describes as “kind of like pissing on each other’s hands and saying
we’re cleansing our hands.”

PLUS, look at the Albright with war criminal Hasim Taci above in Kosovo and also <input ... >Wesley Clark.

It
is common knowledge to US official foreign service employees that once
hired and working as an official US Representative in military and/or
diplomatic capacity, you cannot take on your own personal opinions as
to whether to shake hands with Mladic, Karadzic and/or Taci.

An
official employee of the USA must follow the “Official Position” of
their country of origin. IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE CASE OF THE CLINTON
ADMINISTRATION, ITS OFFICIAL EMPLOYEES AT THAT TIME LIKE WESLEY CLARK
AND ALBRIGHT WHOM BOTH TOOK ON THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATIONS OFFICIAL USA
POSITION THEN, WHICH WAS IT WAS ALRIGHT TO HANG-OUT WITH AL QAEDA AND
KLA WAR CRIMINALS. AND TO ACCEPT CAMPAIGN CONTRINUTIONS FROM THEM ALSO
AS I HAVE SHOWN IN OPENSECRETS PAC MONEY MANIFESTATIONS.

Also,
what about Karadzic’s accusations he fears his life because of
assassination threats emanating from Holbrook threats he had better
withdrawal at once from political public life (?)

I for one
will not be forced fed what I consider strongly Holbrook’s load of
lying crap. I’ve been around enough UN diplomats to understand the true
meaning of what I read below in the newly released US State dept.
papers.

So I ask you, Richard Holbrook–>>>> Are you
saying to the American public, in the same way the American public
asked Bill Clinton whether he was lying when he said “I didn’t have sex
with that women,” that you never pressured Dr Karadzic with any
assassination and/or did you ever Richard holbrook ever threaten to
withdrawl American protection from Dr karadzic if he did not at once
comply with your demands that he immediately withdrawl from political
public life (?)

In your own departmental papers below it states
under no uncertain terms to me that then Bosnian President Izetbegovic
threatened to force Dr Karadzic into resignation if he did not comply
with the demands from US, you and Izetbegovic using “other means than
diplomatic.” THAT SOUNDS LIKE AN EXTREMELY UNFRIENDLY ACT MR.
HOLBROOK—It sounds like you directly told Dr. Karadizc he would get a
bullet in the head otherwise.

LUNCH BREAK IS OVER:

And
Richard Holrbook, I ask you (since you were there and I was not),
exactly what did page 1 of 3 below of this paper ‘ really mean’ (?)

Exactly
what type of actions was it you all seemed to agree “we will support
it” that was going to be undertaken against Dr Karadzic had he not
complied to withdraw from public political office at once (?) It is
obvious the type of action you all present were prepared to take
against Dr karadzic; you were going to assassinate him (!)

This
is the true reason for which you and others in official US diplomat
capacity refuse taking a stand at the Hague in a WITNESS SEAT (!)

Isn’t this true Mr Holbrook (?)

Now let’s continue with page 1. The next sentence reads Holrbok that “PRESSURE ON...”

You
insist that you are some type of good will ’saint’ with wings on your
feet and a some moral American halo on your head huh (?)

You
expect us to believe that you would be willing to participate in an
assassination attempt against Dr Karadzic for non compliance of your
‘agreement’,

but,

we are all supposed to applaud you in
America, for your pressuring “Beograd” in particular, Slobodan
Milosevic, (someone himself later accused of being a war criminal by
you and the Hague ICTY –but useful to you at that time for implementing
the Dayton Accords forward) to bring Karadzic & Mladic to the Hague
at some non existent date later in time huh Holbrook(?)

Yeah right Holbrook (!) HA HA HA.

I don’t believe your crap Holbrook and beg to prove you a liar!!

Now
Mr. Holbrook, the 5 million dollar question is what did you explicitly
mean by what you stated above in your own interview on the topic of
what would happen to Dr Karadzic IF he were to resurface in the public
political sphere of things in the future(?)

Holbrook , just
what exactly did you “make clear” to Ambassador Frowick, Richard (?) It
is obvious to me in meeting Dr Karadzic on several occasions in 2002,
he was obviously making a very specific effort NOT TO SPEAK WHEN HE
REALLY WANTED TO (!)

After all, Mladic had plenty to say, and,
Dr Karadzic is not the shy type when it came to speaking out in bars
about NATO’s actions against Serbia and suffering Serbs in Kosovo and
throughout history.

Dr Karadzic was making a deliberate effort
NOT to speak with me directly and/or outwardly because he was trying to
keep an agreement to withdraw himself from public life to the point Dr
Karadzic KNEW he would be assassinated by you using Izetbegovic and
what was left of his evil influences in Bosnia, otherwise, if he did
not comply with every bit if your agreement (!)

This is the
truth Richard, isn’t it (?) Sorry if I have to put the truth in your
mouth (!) I dare you to deny this, Richard(!) Do you deny what I infer
here about you Richard (?) The American public awaits your truthful
answer. While we wait, we all continue viewing the true American stance
you took on these newly unclassified documents as the next thing you
decide to do is to congratulate yourself and everyone else involved in
the threatening, Dr Karadzic’s life.

I
really do have to thank the Bosniak Conference of what is it...Oh yeah
“North America” for making these documents free on their website; ;
thanks guys.

Now
view part of the documentary evidence immediately following and begin
getting to the crux of the matter as to whether judicial verdicts can
be bought sold and are otherwise concluded at the Hague by what I refer
to by “means other than genuine social justice and facts.”

It
seems Holbrook agrees with me that this is possible because he clearly
states above he feels official US pressure and funding or with holding
funding from the Hague in some manner, or something that he can do in
an official capacity can make the Hague “disappear from Dr Karadzic’s
life,” as we clearly read view the damning evidence against the Hague
above. It seems these newly emergent documents back up my testimony
against the Hague as being a corrupt institution as just read. Unless,
of course Richard Holbrook was going to take some illegal action on his
own accord to make the Hague disappear as indicated in his own
statements.

The
next portion of these documents really stands out and grabs my
attention because as read above, I attest to the fact, Dr karadzic’s
actions when I met him in Beograd with Darko several times in 2002 in
my own mind leaves no room to doubt as a sociologist (a international
sociological honor student), Dr Karadzic definitely acted as if he was
indeed being closely monitored for his public political actions and
speech.

Now
we all know the United States of America has never been a Hague
enthusiast. The USA still reserves the ‘right’ and has ‘reservations
‘not to have its own nationals tried there for war crimes even though
Clinton endorsed it.

The part of the document immediately
following NEITHER manifests in any manner neither Holbrook’s nor the
official USA position on prosecuting anyone accused of war crimes.
It only states the UN SECURITY COUNCIL endorsed that opinion (June 23rd
1996). It does NOT suggest Holbrook endorsed the idea and the evidence
shows contrary.

The bombing of Kosovo in 1999 also makes
manifest whereby, the USA although present in UN Security Council
meetings, neither endorses nor follows its opinions.

In
the posts of these documents following, the White House has removed the
names of the people making the political statements; obviously these
documents are only partially ‘declassified.”

However, they
clearly manifest, at least from Richard Holbrook’s perspective, he was
not going to take additional steps to see the prosecution of, Dr.
Karadzic, at the Hague in the future. Only he can testify as a witness
at the Hague War Crimes tribunal as to what exactly he meant by what we
are reading above. But in a criminal matters in America before court in
concluding Mens Rea beyond reasonable doubt we observe the evidence
introduced, then making logical conclusions.

We can also
conclude by the diplomatic *ullshit following in these documents that
our own American government, as it always has, tells the American
public one thing, but behind diplomatic doors does an entire other.

Exemplary
of what I mean follows because we CAN NOT read the name of the exact
‘American Diplomat’ whose name is removed for obvious reasons making
the following statement outwardly, employing diplomatic overtones
suggesting the US comply with the Hague in the future although in their
last breath said on the former page they could not care less about
prosecuting war criminals at all.

Next
we read whereby the Clinton administration employed United States
taxpayer money. These documents prove beyond a shadow of doubt all
about President Obama’s unwise choosing Hillary Clinton as his newly
appointed, Secretary of State in America and she ran her campaign
largely based upon her experiences in diplomacy learned directly from
husband and former US President, Bill Clinton. Look at the Clinton’s
opinion on holding free and true democratic elections in the former
Yugoslavia in these newly unclassified documents; I myself am shocked!

And
as to the further question of the day as to whether there will be
“future Holbrook missions,” I can strongly suggest that the entire
world “hope not!” And if I were President Oobama I would force both
Richard Holbrook and Hillary Clinton into an early retirement over this
mess.

Gee, and I was told that I actually failed the foreign
service test in America last summer when I took it(?) LOL. Gee even I
would make a better Secretary of State and diplomat than either Hillary
and/or Holbrook.

*hit!
Now we all have “serious concerns” and have to wonder about the
American President’s true stance insofar as Iran goes when we read a
comment like this->

Then we read this...

Hey
wait ! This ought to be my line! This is why I went to Serbia and
Montenegro in Mid-August (LOL), to investigate. Since there is so much
seemingly dry humor involved in these documents, I could not resist
adding my own LOL.

Everything
surrounding European, NATO, UN and associated American
relations/actions with respects to the wars that occurred in the former
Yugoslavia is highly suspect in my estimation.

One wonders why,
if Ratko Mladic was surrounded by strongly armed bodyguards of about 50
men as was testified to in a Belgrade court last week (and we can see
the size of this man-huge and a self-admitted former bodyguard of Mr.
Mladic) one must also wonder why either Karadzic and/or Mladic would
get near me; I am a war crimes investigator; and I am an American
citizen of former Jewish decent.

Why did so many other war crimes investigators seemingly end up bullied and/or dead in their investigations in this affair (?)

I
conclude that both Mr Mladic and Mr Karadzic knew my intentions in
collecting evidence in the war crimes cases of the former Yugoslavia
was genuine. I also conclude both men are innocent and they wanted
someone to genuinely investigate the allegations of war crimes against
them with genuine intentions because both men firmly believed a true
war crimes investigation would expose the truth that they are innocent
and wrongly accused.

I think both Mladic and Karadzic knew
other investigators associated with the Hague and American were two
faced liars like Holbrook etc, and would be present to merely collect
monetary bounties and/or for unethical diplomatic reasons meant to
purely demonize them. I yet have an answer to this question; only they
know what they thought.

Anyway, my reading these documents is almost concluded.

Next,
we read contradictory statements that since they DID NOT come from Dr
Karadzic himself, make us wonder if they are true at all. Why (?)
Because in the first sentence it indicates Dr. Karadzic felt a total
lack of security. If the first sentence is true, how could the next
sentence be true because it read that Dr Karadzic “never really felt
seriously like his life was threatened.” Which is it (?) The man is a
doctor of psychiatry either he felt his life was in danger or he did
not feel this way. I do NOT believe he was ambivalent about his life in
feeling both ways (!) Only he can answer this question.

What is
logical however to conclude is that if Dr. Karadzic genuinely felt he
would spend his remaining days reading Russian authors, he must have
truly had some immunity arrangement behind closed doors with Holbrook.

Next, as a sociologist, I conclude that yes, Dr. Karadzic felt very strongly about not leaving Republika Srpska in Bosnia. But as a logical man himself, and, since he eventually did leave RS, something must have seriously pressured to do so.
I know no other threat but someone threatening his life physically, as
he claims Richard Holbrook did (with assassination), that could have
possibly made Dr Karadzic reconsider and leave RS for Serbia. read
below please->

Reading
additional portions of these documents we still are in the same
conversation about Dr. Karadzic remaining in RS area. It is UNCLEAR but
highly suspect as to what was meant in “carrying out attacks.” It seems
to me clear perhaps this meant attacks against Dr. Karadzic’s life. I
do not know what it really meant because everything is contradictory in
diplomacy and its doublespeak.

Next, yes I agree what we read
is indeed “odd observations” because I have known in friendship some of
Dr. Karadzic’s close associates and I have never heard any such
comments even remotely resembling these; I seriously doubt there
sincerity. For whatever it is worth the papers read->

Now
we read the most damning statements of all for Holbrook. It is clearly
indicated below that, sure, Dr. Karadzic did have a deal on the table
in which Holbrook offers him immunity from Hague prosecution and he
could live in Montenegro if he agrees to this before he left the
Balkans for America. I WISH SOMEONE WOULD OFFER ME THIS DEAL.

CLEARLY
EITHER RICHARD HOLBROOK IS A LIAR OR BI-POLAR (!) We can see this in
the next sentence of these documents in which it clearly states
Holbrook admits Dr. Karadzic living in Montenegro is a great
suggestion->:

That
is the end of the papers. I will say that I have always told Darko, and
I told him this immediately before I left Beograd in 2002 to return
from my visit to Serbia and Montenegro, I always told him: “Darko,
if you and your country ever needs my testimony at the Hague in the
future to attest to what I have witnessed, I will always be there.”
Darko replied, “Thank you Jill, we’ll see when and if that day comes.”

The
State Department on June 25 announced it would make public documents
pertaining to new accusations by Radovan Karadzic, the indicted Serbian
war leader, that the U.S. government and specifically U.S. Ambassador
Richard Holbrooke had promised him immunity from prosecution for war
crimes during the Bosnian war (1992-1995) if he would withdraw from
public life.

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former
Yugoslavia (ICTY) in 1995 indicted Karadzic for war crimes, including
charges that his forces killed at least 7,500 Bosniak men and boys from
Srebrenica in 1995 as part of an ethnic cleansing campaign against the
Bosniak and Bosnian Croat population. A year after his indictment,
Karadzic stepped down as president of the Serbian Democratic Party
(SDS) and went into hiding. Serbian authorities arrested Karadzic in
2008 - nearly 13 years after being on the run.

Karadzic on May
25, 2009 filed a motion entitled “Holbrooke Agreement Motion” before
the ITCY arguing that his indictment should be dismissed on the grounds
that the U.S. government had offered him a “quid pro quo.” The State
Department’s newly released documents show that the U.S. government
repeatedly made clear that it expected Karadzic to be tried at The
Hague, even following his agreement to retire from public life. Link to
State Department Press Release.

Upon learning of the new
documents, USIP vice president Daniel Serwer said “I am delighted to
see these documents, which clarify the US Government’s position in 1996
and refute Karadzic’s “immunity” claims.”