The quantitative range for this assay is 25 IU/mL to 69 Million IU/mL using a combination of Taqman real-time PCR (LLOQ 43 IU/mL) plus reflex to another Taqman assay (LLOQ 25 IU/mL) for low viral load samples that were detectable by the original Taqman real-time PCR assay but not quantifiable. The limit of detection of the assay is 7.1 IU/mL for HCV Genotype 1.

Question: Does this mean my VL is lower than 25 IU/mL or 7.1 IU/mL & I am technically not UND yet, right?

Thanks for your timely response. That pretty much correlates with what I have read but there was a huge part of me that had my hopes up. I need to see the assay of the tests the other people are getting when they have their four week labs and post a nurse calls them to inform them they are UND.

Thanks for your timely response. That pretty much correlates with what I have read but there was a huge part of me that had my hopes up. I need to see the assay of the tests the other people are getting when they have their four week labs and post a nurse calls them to inform them they are UND.

I can sure understand wanting that 4 week und, but on the bright side you know with under 25 you are having a very good response... So close yet so far away, hang in there, wishing you the very best......

I can sure understand wanting that 4 week und, but on the bright side you know with under 25 you are having a very good response... So close yet so far away, hang in there, wishing you the very best......

I was just re-reading the Futility Rules and this is what is throwing me off:

For the purpose of assessing response-guided therapy eligibility at weeks 4 and 12 (see Table 1), an “undetectable” HCV-RNA result is required; a confirmed “detectable but below limit of quantification” HCV-RNA result should not be considered equivalent to an “undetectable” HCV-RNA result.

So, didn't my doctor use the wrong....assay (???) to ***** my condition and apply the Futility Rules? Should I call them? btw I only had a partial response on Peg/Riba Had a 2 Log drop in the beginning and nothing after that so I stopped before 12 weeks

I was just re-reading the Futility Rules and this is what is throwing me off:

For the purpose of assessing response-guided therapy eligibility at weeks 4 and 12 (see Table 1), an “undetectable” HCV-RNA result is required; a confirmed “detectable but below limit of quantification” HCV-RNA result should not be considered equivalent to an “undetectable” HCV-RNA result.

So, didn't my doctor use the wrong....assay (???) to ***** my condition and apply the Futility Rules? Should I call them? btw I only had a partial response on Peg/Riba Had a 2 Log drop in the beginning and nothing after that so I stopped before 12 weeks

No your doctor used the correct test, its the same as vertex used in their trials. And as you can see below you are not whats called a null responder which is very good news. You would be a Partial responder so odds are very much more in your favor.

Null Responder: A null responder is someone who achieves little or no decrease in hepatitis C viral load during HCV treatment. Null responders are highly unlikely to respond to re-treatment with an interferon-based regimen.

Non-responder: Often referred to as a "treatment failure," a non-responder is someone who does not have an EVR or, if they stay on treatment for 24 weeks, does not ever have a 2-log (99%) drop in hepatitis C viral load or undetectable HCV RNA during hepatitis C treatment.

Partial Responder: A partial responder is someone who experiences at least a 2-log decrease in hepatitis C viral load during HCV treatment. Partial responders are more likely to respond to re-treatment than non-responders or null responders.

No your doctor used the correct test, its the same as vertex used in their trials. And as you can see below you are not whats called a null responder which is very good news. You would be a Partial responder so odds are very much more in your favor.

Null Responder: A null responder is someone who achieves little or no decrease in hepatitis C viral load during HCV treatment. Null responders are highly unlikely to respond to re-treatment with an interferon-based regimen.

Non-responder: Often referred to as a "treatment failure," a non-responder is someone who does not have an EVR or, if they stay on treatment for 24 weeks, does not ever have a 2-log (99%) drop in hepatitis C viral load or undetectable HCV RNA during hepatitis C treatment.

Partial Responder: A partial responder is someone who experiences at least a 2-log decrease in hepatitis C viral load during HCV treatment. Partial responders are more likely to respond to re-treatment than non-responders or null responders.

Aren't these the results of your test and do they not say HCV not detected? What part of this indicates that you still have viral load under the limit of detection? I am still confused in reading these tests. The rest of the information you typed in your post is, I believe, the discussion of the range of the test and there is no personal informaiton on your test in that paragraph. Is that how you understand it?

Aren't these the results of your test and do they not say HCV not detected? What part of this indicates that you still have viral load under the limit of detection? I am still confused in reading these tests. The rest of the information you typed in your post is, I believe, the discussion of the range of the test and there is no personal informaiton on your test in that paragraph. Is that how you understand it?

Patients with inadequate viral response are unlikely to achieve SVR. Futility rules are therefore in place at key time points during treatment. Discontinuation of therapy is recommended in patients meeting these rules.

Patients with inadequate viral response are unlikely to achieve SVR, and may develop treatment-emergent resistance substitutions. Discontinuation of therapy is recommended in all patients with

(1) HCV-RNA levels of greater than or equal to 1000 IU/mL at Treatment Week 4 or 12; or

Patients with inadequate viral response are unlikely to achieve SVR. Futility rules are therefore in place at key time points during treatment. Discontinuation of therapy is recommended in patients meeting these rules.

Patients with inadequate viral response are unlikely to achieve SVR, and may develop treatment-emergent resistance substitutions. Discontinuation of therapy is recommended in all patients with

(1) HCV-RNA levels of greater than or equal to 1000 IU/mL at Treatment Week 4 or 12; or

"So at this point I think it only matters that my HCV-RNA levles were LESS than 1000 IU/mL "
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not going to comment on the interpretation of the test. I leave that to the experts on the forum.

I will, however, comment on your statement above.

For the purpose of continuing treatment, you are correct. Your levels were under 1000 so you can continue treatment.

However, if you are/were truly detectable at 4 weeks on Incivek and SOC, you will need to treat for 48 weeks instead of 24. To me (who has to treat for 48 weeks because of detectable virus at 4 weeks) that is a big difference. I was very happy at 4 weeks that I could continue treatment because I was so afraid I might be 1000 or above and have to stop. I am now at 21 weeks and have been undetectable since week 8. I am happy I am undetectable, but I really, really wish I had been undetectable at 4 weeks. So to me it does make a difference in the long run.

If I were you, I would get this test result clarified by your doctor or your lab or both. Hopefully your doc can interpret the test accurately.

"So at this point I think it only matters that my HCV-RNA levles were LESS than 1000 IU/mL "
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not going to comment on the interpretation of the test. I leave that to the experts on the forum.

I will, however, comment on your statement above.

For the purpose of continuing treatment, you are correct. Your levels were under 1000 so you can continue treatment.

However, if you are/were truly detectable at 4 weeks on Incivek and SOC, you will need to treat for 48 weeks instead of 24. To me (who has to treat for 48 weeks because of detectable virus at 4 weeks) that is a big difference. I was very happy at 4 weeks that I could continue treatment because I was so afraid I might be 1000 or above and have to stop. I am now at 21 weeks and have been undetectable since week 8. I am happy I am undetectable, but I really, really wish I had been undetectable at 4 weeks. So to me it does make a difference in the long run.

If I were you, I would get this test result clarified by your doctor or your lab or both. Hopefully your doc can interpret the test accurately.

"for low viral load samples that were detectable by the original Taqman real-time PCR assay but not quantifiable." As stated above, the sample was detectable, but not quantifiable. That is my understanding. "

I am not sure what tweedle means by undetectible when the verbiage clearly does not say you are not detectible, except over the sensitivity of 25. However; with even one virus present it opens the door to possible reinfection and you must eradicate them all - not just the ones in your bloodwork but others that might be present outside it.

The good news is that you can continue on with the protocol and have an excellent shot at the CURE. In the end that is the goal you must remember is the most important.

"for low viral load samples that were detectable by the original Taqman real-time PCR assay but not quantifiable." As stated above, the sample was detectable, but not quantifiable. That is my understanding. "

I am not sure what tweedle means by undetectible when the verbiage clearly does not say you are not detectible, except over the sensitivity of 25. However; with even one virus present it opens the door to possible reinfection and you must eradicate them all - not just the ones in your bloodwork but others that might be present outside it.

The good news is that you can continue on with the protocol and have an excellent shot at the CURE. In the end that is the goal you must remember is the most important.

You should talk to your doctor of course but I just got my week 24 labs last week and they say the same. I am UND.

My Interpretation, not an expert:
Hcv not detected = UND is my understanding too as stated by suezeeque above

Hcv log10
Unable to calculate...
Think of this as a divide by 0 error. The software tried to divide your viral load, which had no value. Since you do not have a viral load number, the software could not calculate a log, it needs a number.

The quantitative range...
This is a description of the sensitivity of the test. Since it can only measure above a certain level of viral load, it's possible there is some small amount of virus still lurking. This is why people relapse from und so keep treating.

Not a doctor and can't see your results but believe congratulations are in order.

You should talk to your doctor of course but I just got my week 24 labs last week and they say the same. I am UND.

My Interpretation, not an expert:
Hcv not detected = UND is my understanding too as stated by suezeeque above

Hcv log10
Unable to calculate...
Think of this as a divide by 0 error. The software tried to divide your viral load, which had no value. Since you do not have a viral load number, the software could not calculate a log, it needs a number.

The quantitative range...
This is a description of the sensitivity of the test. Since it can only measure above a certain level of viral load, it's possible there is some small amount of virus still lurking. This is why people relapse from und so keep treating.

Not a doctor and can't see your results but believe congratulations are in order.

The sample was detectable by the original Tagman RT-PCR, but not quantifiable (LLOQ 43). Another more sensitive (LLOQ 25) Taqman assay was run and the results were determined "Not Detected". Therefore, this more sensitive assay is the definitive result of the test.

What I find confusing is that I thought the limit of detection of the both assays is 7.1 IU/mL. This stuff continues to mystify me since it shouldn't be that complicated in translating the results. Hopefully your doctor can help explain this to you.

The sample was detectable by the original Tagman RT-PCR, but not quantifiable (LLOQ 43). Another more sensitive (LLOQ 25) Taqman assay was run and the results were determined "Not Detected". Therefore, this more sensitive assay is the definitive result of the test.

What I find confusing is that I thought the limit of detection of the both assays is 7.1 IU/mL. This stuff continues to mystify me since it shouldn't be that complicated in translating the results. Hopefully your doctor can help explain this to you.

The test the way I read it means that you were UND. However what did your doctor say? He is the one that needs to interpret these tests correctly
.If he is unsure demand that he contact the lab for clarification. That is his job and why he is being paid.

These tests are far to important not tot have concise and quick exact interpretation by the professionals that are paid to inform us correctly..
Best to you..
Will

The test the way I read it means that you were UND. However what did your doctor say? He is the one that needs to interpret these tests correctly
.If he is unsure demand that he contact the lab for clarification. That is his job and why he is being paid.

These tests are far to important not tot have concise and quick exact interpretation by the professionals that are paid to inform us correctly..
Best to you..
Will

__________________
I sort of got sidetracked and started reading stuff like this to understand why it's like that and where am I getting confused. The explanation in the "Interpretation" portion of this document helped a little:

________________________---
♫ While I am on a ramble I would like to say:♫

1. I really appreciate recent thoughts and analysis on common and routine questions. I realize it may get frustrating sometimes but thoughts and ideas get wiser, more refined & precise as they evolve. Plus, I often have to read something several times before it sinks in. Usually it is the same thing is said in different ways.

2. The Search Function is easier and more fruitful when people use "Tags." So sometimes it's not that I really don't use the search function before I ask a question.

3. Gah! This is the only Forum out of many I have been a member where there is not at least a 10 minute edit function!! Once you post: you post. So, I need to get used to checking my posts before I submit them so thanks for your patience.

__________________
I sort of got sidetracked and started reading stuff like this to understand why it's like that and where am I getting confused. The explanation in the "Interpretation" portion of this document helped a little:

________________________---
♫ While I am on a ramble I would like to say:♫

1. I really appreciate recent thoughts and analysis on common and routine questions. I realize it may get frustrating sometimes but thoughts and ideas get wiser, more refined & precise as they evolve. Plus, I often have to read something several times before it sinks in. Usually it is the same thing is said in different ways.

2. The Search Function is easier and more fruitful when people use "Tags." So sometimes it's not that I really don't use the search function before I ask a question.

3. Gah! This is the only Forum out of many I have been a member where there is not at least a 10 minute edit function!! Once you post: you post. So, I need to get used to checking my posts before I submit them so thanks for your patience.

The quantitative range for this assay is 25 IU/mL to 69 Million IU/mL using a combination of Taqman real-time PCR (LLOQ 43 IU/mL) plus reflex to another Taqman assay (LLOQ 25 IU/mL) for low viral load samples that were detectable by the original Taqman real-time PCR assay but not quantifiable. The limit of detection of the assay is 7.1 IU/mL for HCV Genotype 1.

I think this is the standard wording to define the test. If someone is detectible under the 43, then they run thru again to determine if there is detection between 25 and 43. However, if there is detectible virus which is nonquantifiable, down to 7.1, it would be stated in the first paragraph which is the actual patient result.

Hepatitis C Quantitation HCV Not Detected IU/mL -- I believe this is your result. Since the test can't detect levels below 7.1, you could possibly have viral load under that. However I would call you undetectible on this test.

in this CCO presentation by Dr. Kwo he discusses the difficulty in interpreting the PCRs. It is an interactive presentation - meaning you answer questions - and I am surprised at the amount of wrong answers on this one

The quantitative range for this assay is 25 IU/mL to 69 Million IU/mL using a combination of Taqman real-time PCR (LLOQ 43 IU/mL) plus reflex to another Taqman assay (LLOQ 25 IU/mL) for low viral load samples that were detectable by the original Taqman real-time PCR assay but not quantifiable. The limit of detection of the assay is 7.1 IU/mL for HCV Genotype 1.

I think this is the standard wording to define the test. If someone is detectible under the 43, then they run thru again to determine if there is detection between 25 and 43. However, if there is detectible virus which is nonquantifiable, down to 7.1, it would be stated in the first paragraph which is the actual patient result.

Hepatitis C Quantitation HCV Not Detected IU/mL -- I believe this is your result. Since the test can't detect levels below 7.1, you could possibly have viral load under that. However I would call you undetectible on this test.

in this CCO presentation by Dr. Kwo he discusses the difficulty in interpreting the PCRs. It is an interactive presentation - meaning you answer questions - and I am surprised at the amount of wrong answers on this one

I regret to say I realized I was hepititis c positive when I was pregnant I was worried sick and still am he is now 21 months and I know as embarrassing as it was all my doctors were aware and notified about the issue and my concerns with giving birth they made me believe he would be fine and natural birth was the way to go I wish I had more information then but anyway my sons test results say antibodies positive for hepititis I realize this can be present from the mother until 18 months he is 21 months and further testing indicated hepititis c RNA detector qual. His results were detected (not detected) A . I just would love any information it makes me sick to think he could be sick because of me and I am praying it just isn't but his atl and ast are elevated his AST is 52 in a range of (<40) and his ALT is 53 in a range of (<41) I am having a hard time sleeping eating I would just die to think my little baby with his little body has to start off life in a fight with medications and the possibility of cancer and 20 year prognosis of life or the fact that my little handsome boy has to tell every girl he's with I am infected it just ***** I can deal with myself but not him he's too young it kills me and any information any one can give me I would so appreciate his platelet count and white blood cells were high and his co2 was low and so was his creatinine I just don't know what this all means thank you

I regret to say I realized I was hepititis c positive when I was pregnant I was worried sick and still am he is now 21 months and I know as embarrassing as it was all my doctors were aware and notified about the issue and my concerns with giving birth they made me believe he would be fine and natural birth was the way to go I wish I had more information then but anyway my sons test results say antibodies positive for hepititis I realize this can be present from the mother until 18 months he is 21 months and further testing indicated hepititis c RNA detector qual. His results were detected (not detected) A . I just would love any information it makes me sick to think he could be sick because of me and I am praying it just isn't but his atl and ast are elevated his AST is 52 in a range of (<40) and his ALT is 53 in a range of (<41) I am having a hard time sleeping eating I would just die to think my little baby with his little body has to start off life in a fight with medications and the possibility of cancer and 20 year prognosis of life or the fact that my little handsome boy has to tell every girl he's with I am infected it just ***** I can deal with myself but not him he's too young it kills me and any information any one can give me I would so appreciate his platelet count and white blood cells were high and his co2 was low and so was his creatinine I just don't know what this all means thank you

The quantitative range for this assay is 25 IU/mL to 69 Million IU/mL using a combination of Taqman real-time PCR (LLOQ 43 IU/mL) plus reflex to another Taqman assay (LLOQ 25 IU/mL) for low viral load samples that were detectable by the original Taqman real-time PCR assay but not quantifiable. The limit of detection of the assay is 7.1 IU/mL for HCV Genotype 1.

Question: Does this mean my VL is lower than 25 IU/mL or 7.1 IU/mL & I am technically not UND yet, right?

The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.