Position: Senior Advisor to the Chancellor, University of California at Davis.

Salary: $205,000, plus $50,000 bonus.

Benefits: Full University of California health and retirement benefits.

Duties: None.

Possibility for dismissal or layoff: None.

Workplace: Home.

A public notice for such a package would attract many candidates but there was no ad in the Chronicle of Higher Education or anywhere else. The University of California at Davis cut the deal, in secret, for one woman, vice chancellor Celeste Rose.

A UCLA grad who earned a law degree from UC Davis in 1982, Rose served in the early 1980s as a legislative aide to Willie Brown, Speaker of the California Assembly. She went on to compile an impressive c.v.: assistant director of governmental relations in the Office of the President of the University of California; executive director for public affairs at the National Collegiate Athletic Association in 1997—”the first black woman appointed to the NCAA’s senior management staff,” as the announcement put it; then, in 1998, the vice chancellor for university relations at UC Davis.

In February, 2005, however, this story of upward mobility ended—or appeared to—when UC Davis chancellor Larry N. Vanderhoef told Rose that the Davis campus wanted to make changes in “advancement leadership,” and that she needed to resign in June. She would keep her salary of $186,000 until the end of the calendar year and UC Davis would assist her in finding another job. This was the beginning of another chapter in the saga of higher education’s clumsy attempt to play the race card, alternatively upping the ante and folding.

Nobody will go on record about the reason Vanderhoef asked Rose to step down but Davis insiders flag the problem as job performance. These individuals, who fear to talk on the record, also note that her record would have to be abysmal for UC Davis to show the door to a black, female administrator, the campus equivalent of a trophy wife. It was Davis, after all, that maintained the 16-percent racial quota that led to the 1978 Bakke case. The University of California has since adopted rules against racial preferences, and in 1996, voters approved Proposition 209, the initiative that eliminated racial preferences in state employment, education and contracting. But the Davis campus remains obsessed with diversity and inclusion, code words for quotas.

The original deal offered to Rose equaled or surpassed the golden parachute given to other UC Davis senior managers who had also been asked to step down. For her part, Rose believed her parachute was not quite golden enough and retained Melinda Guzman Moore, a Davis alum and promoter of affirmative action. On May 9, 2005, Guzman Moore wrote to UC Davis chancellor Larry N. Vanderhoef praising Rose’s performance as “stellar,” and “unmatched by any of her peers.” Rose was an “icon” and “a role model for all employees, and in particular for minority and African American employees.”

White males and females at Davis, Guzman Moore charged, had not been subject to the “harsh termination procedures.” They had been given “soft landings,” assignments and paid leaves of absence. “The only logical conclusion that can be deduced from these facts is that you have treated Vice Chancellor Rose differently because of her race and gender.” It was further charged that “Vice Chancellor Rose’s abrupt termination leaves an objective observer to conclude that her treatment is based on the fact that she is a woman, an African American woman, or an African American.”

{snip}

On June 1, less than three weeks after Guzman Moore’s letter, Vanderhoef served Rose with a lucrative hush-money package: $205,000 a year for two years—a raise of nearly $20,000 from her former salary—as Senior Advisor to the Chancellor at the Davis campus, a sinecure in which she would have to approve any duties. She can’t be fired and gets the money even if she quits. According to UC Davis officials, the deal could increase Rose’s severance by $20,500 and her annual pension by $17,000 a year.

Rose dropped her accusation and grabbed the money. A few days after she signed the lucrative deal she partied with Bruce Darling and seven other high UC officials at Biba’s in Sacramento, where they ran up a bill of $652.38, most of it on the UC tab, that included $230 for wine.

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.