I haven't really been in contact with any of their recent models, so I don't know if they've improved since them. The backdoor issues that happened a few years ago doesn't exactly inspire me any confidence on the software front. Only one of my business customers currently has a 5-6 years old model setup as an access point, we use an RT-AC68U as their main router as he needed the extra traffic monitoring capabilities.

I suspect that TP-Link has gradually eaten away D-Link's market share here in North America in the inexpensive market bracket.

imho dlink sit these days in a strange space , they are producing quality devices the like of the dir-890L and the dsl-4320L , which are high end products and at a very high end price tag that are quite competitive hardware wise

for me the gui is the main issue as its latest re creation saw the gui dumbed down to a point its missing lots to make it simple , its almost like it needs an advanced section where all the goodies are stored but they forgot to put it in

i can only imagine the dir-879 has the same gui

high cost and poor gui design and lack of expected features see dlink struggle to get and keep market share in what is a very competitive field

We have to be hard on every router brand not just d-link. The main question anyone would ask when it comes to consumer routers if they dont believe the shiny words are "why should i buy this? My ISP given router already does the job well", "these expensive routers still hang every once in a while just like my crappy ISP router". Essentially if consumer routers that you have to buy still suffer from the same problems as crappy ISP routers than they become worthless even with their shiny performance, features and looks. Crappy ISPs like virgin media have been giving their own routers to their customers that have wireless AC, gigabit ethernet ports, usb, etc. I call it a crappy ISP because not only is their router crappy but also their service but most people arent the wiser, they dont know what is the difference between having something of quality to even telling if your food/restaurant is serving quality food rather than crappy tasty food to whether or not the seller is ripping you off by overpricing or selling fakes.

The other problem is security. When security is lax you can fall prey not only to people who want to steal your money and stuff but will use your stuff as part of their botnet to attack others so it means you get involved in crime. Its like someone taking your car/gun and using it to rob a bank which than gets traced back to you.

This is why i asked @thiggins to do comparisons with ISP provided routers in what benefit do they offer over them so people can be happy with their purchase.

I like mikrotik but i am hard on them, i continously criticise them on their cutting of corners (CCR PSUs) and other things even in mikrotik forums. We criticise because we want them to improve.

Not just them, but pretty much any Router/AP is going to have some security issue - esp. as Vendors pile on more stuff...

This is why Tim has introduced additional testing to look specifically at these kind of concerns.

Security, whether D-Link, or some other vendor, is another thread perhaps - this is a product announcement/review... if there's serious security issues, it can be published in the review itself due to the direct hands on experience with the device in an instrumented facility and test cases to back it up.

--
This post brought to you via the letters "e" and "t", and the number "1"

The only D-Link router that I've had was a DIR-655. Used it for several years, it was solid and worked well in its day. In fact, it's still in use at my daughter's apartment, loaned (gave *smile*) it to her several years ago. Since then they haven't put out any products that have interested me, so I can't critique their current offerings. My impression is that they have come along at the trailing edge, timing wise.

Been using D-Link for years. Been solid routers accept for maybe a couple. The DGL-5500 was a disappointment for sure. Wasn't really D-Links fault, however it's there name. The DGL-4500, 655 and 868L are rock solid routers and still are. The 655 has been the work horse for D-Link in many applications. I'm currently enjoying the 880L and 890L routers. I even went back recently to the DGL-4500 due to gaming capacities with more than one game console and what a breeze it is with the DGL-4500.

I do agree with some that the new UI is a bit less featured and not as granular as of UI past. Not sure why they went in that direction. I guess that maybe D-Link targeted the average home users rather then the more advanced users. The UI seems to be improving and they are adding items here and there. I presume that maybe D-Link is keeping things simplified for the average home user that this is why the UI has some features missing from UI past. After all, for the average home user, there are some features that are probably not used much. The average home user just wants to get it out of the box and connect it and have it work! I do wish D-Link would have a advanced version of the UI for those power users. Seeing post here, I can empathize with you however for the most part, D-Link continues to make some good solid routers. Maybe not to the wishes of the more advanced users however, again, D-Link has been mainly in the home class router target so what they come up with is up to them. Why there are many different models and some support 3rd party FW like DD-WRT and OpenWRT. So there's always that consideration.

If some users are missing the granular UI of routers past which they may still be using, no reason why you still can't. Maybe the wifi isn't as good on the older router, however, users can disable the wifi radio on the older router and LAN cable connect up to a newer wifi AP while keeping the older router for it's UI and performance use. User don't have to always go out and buy a new router. I connected my AC class router in AP mode to my DGL-4500, BOOM, wireless upgrade for the 4500 while still maintaining the 4500's performance and UI operation.

I believe D-Link strives to make good routers and does actively fix security issues when notified. There seen here and there just like the other Mfrs. There not perfect nor is anyone else. They do what they can to keep things safe and secure. After all, security fluctuates everyday and new loopholes are found, even after release of a product. Hard to by psychic in this area.

For anyone looking at D-Link, give some credit and users looking for something new, do some due diligence first and go look and review what D-link has to offer. Look hard what what your realistic needs are. Ask questions with support and forum help. Do you really need a high end AC/AD class router, are you looking to really future proof or do you just need something to get you online, be safe and enjoy with out having to pay big bucks for a router with 8-16 antennae. LoL. Some users shouldn't be so hard on D-Link. We all have complaints about one thing or another about each Mfr. After all we are there beta testers. And over the years of experience, not all problems are due to FW or HW issues with any mfr router. There are many other factors to consider when trying to fix problems seen with routers and Wifi. I can only imaging how many routers went into the trash or given up due to false positives or mis-understanding of the root problem or not finding the true root problem of any router.

D-Links been doing this for a while now. a bit longer than some. I like there development and update cycle. They try to see things thru to the end even though I believe there is some improvement could be done in the development and testing department. Of course this goes for all other Mfrs too. I won't name one particular Mfr which I will not be going back to and never recommend. Thank god for OpenWRT on that router!

I may seem like a fan boy however just a long time experienced D-Link user and enjoy them for what they are and what they have for me and others. Ya I have a couple of other fancy non-D-Link routers and looking forward to testing one of them new fangled AD class router soon. Even though I don't have anything to support AD fully as of yet. I look forward to seeing what D-Link does in this class. Maybe @CES 2017.

I just can't figure out why this budget router is rated beyond all other routers tested in Total Simultaneous Throughput - TCP of 1850 mbps, is this a mistake? This $100 router has more throughput than even the likes of Synology RT2600AC, Netgear X4S, Talon AD7200, Asus AC5300, really?

May have less processing to do than the others. I presume if SNB tested all three in the same test configuration, I presume it reveals differences between Mfrs and what they do with router HW and FW. Also seems that Realtek maybe better performer than Broadcom. Many factors to consider when testing and development of a product.

I just can't figure out why this budget router is rated beyond all other routers tested in Total Simultaneous Throughput - TCP of 1850 mbps, is this a mistake? This $100 router has more throughput than even the likes of Synology RT2600AC, Netgear X4S, Talon AD7200, Asus AC5300, really?

May have less processing to do than the others. I presume if SNB tested all three in the same test configuration, I presume it reveals differences between Mfrs and what they do with router HW and FW. Also seems that Realtek maybe better performer than Broadcom. Many factors to consider when testing and development of a product.

Click to expand...

Yeah its weird, i was think maybe SNB started some new measurement criteria, so maybe like it applies to newly tested stuff but not previously tested, like you'd need to retest to get the new measurements, not sure.

Or maybe there is something special about Realtek (sounds like an audio chip mfgr) vs. others, cause i don't see any other realtek out there.