Lady Gaga’s vanity project and nonprofit organization, the Born This Way Foundation, only donated $5,000 out of its $2.1 million in earnings in 2012.the entire was made during a tour stop in North Arkansas. An employee of a fast food outlet, known only as Barney, appeared to meet the criteria to qualify for this funding. Barney giggled "I've got to be me" as he/she strutted back to work.

Now Barney, wasn't it just a couple of days ago you were mocking others for spelling errors? You were rolling around on the floor, cackling like an insane person, repeating yourself over and over, calling it 'irony'?Now see, you can't pull that off, because you are not very smart. Then karma comes a calling and bites you right in the ass.'Their' not still signing up.'They're' not really signing up either. And lots of people are realizing that they can fill out a waiver that exempts them from being forced to participate and keeps them from being penalized from the Obamanable Health Act.Not you, of course. You are too busy policing Topix, and making yourself look like a bigger buffoon than the day before!

After 2 prior post stating the misspelled word was not the point, and this 3rd post just being point blank, it looks like you Mental Midgets would get the Idea.

Karma, not hardly, narrow minded ignorance, you could not be a better example!

<quoted text>After 2 prior post stating the misspelled word was not the point, and this 3rd post just being point blank, it looks like you Mental Midgets would get the Idea.Karma, not hardly, narrow minded ignorance, you could not be a better example!

If that wasn't the point, you are not doing a very good job of communicating. You must not spend a lot of times around adults.

<quoted text>After 2 prior post stating the misspelled word was not the point, and this 3rd post just being point blank, it looks like you Mental Midgets would get the Idea.Karma, not hardly, narrow minded ignorance, you could not be a better example!

Barney, Karma has your number on speed dial! You hardly get a comment posted before Karma is calling your name again!The funny thing is, you always answer!!

NEW YORK – A House committee investigating the IRS scandal has found a link between President Obama’s criticism of the Citizens United Supreme Court decision and subsequent steps taken by IRS official Lois Lerner to discriminate against conservative groups.Lerner was responding to political pressure in her efforts to clamp down on conservative organizations seeking tax-exempt status in the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, concluded a 141-page report released last Tuesday by the Republican-majority staff of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.Lerner twice has invoked the Fifth Amendment and refused to answer questions in appearances before the committee.The report clearly raised the question of whether or not the political pressure came from the White House.“It’s not the job of the IRS to overrule the Supreme Court, and it’s not the job of the IRS to crush political movements its leaders dislike,” the report said.“Her deep involvement in this scheme raises even more questions about who else was involved – including at the White House.”

Connect for Health Colorado, the state’s health insurance exchange under Obamacare, is lowering its own expectations of how many people will enroll in the program.This has lead its CEO to ask for a fee hike to prevent what she described as dramatic budget cuts.Optimistic projections originally had as many as 204,000 people enrolling through Connect for Health Colorado by the end of March. But as noted by the website Health News Colorado, only about 90,000 have signed up so far.

Your referenced article makes the point, the program has only hit the very minimum goals and the people that would make the whole system viable are avoiding it like you avoid soap. Good deals have people standing in line to be accepted. This health care system reminds me of the draft registration, you're going to be forced to sign up but you'll be damned to do it until you are absolutely forced to.

<quoted text>I like your way of thinking, the mandate is delayed, and their still sighing up by the thousands.

Problem is, nobody knows if they are paying by the thousands. My guess is the vast majority of those signing up are big Obama supporters who only signed up to make the numbers look good but have no intention of paying the first dime because they want something for nothing. The fact that the Obama administration hasn't released any payment numbers speaks volumes. With all of the negative publicity surrounding this bill, if everybody who signed up had paid, Obama would be out there every day giving updates on how much money they have taken in and how great the bill is working. But the bill is not working so Obama has to try every trick in the book (Constitutional or not) to help this bill along.

<quoted text>Problem is, nobody knows if they are paying by the thousands. My guess is the vast majority of those signing up are big Obama supporters who only signed up to make the numbers look good but have no intention of paying the first dime because they want something for nothing. The fact that the Obama administration hasn't released any payment numbers speaks volumes. With all of the negative publicity surrounding this bill, if everybody who signed up had paid, Obama would be out there every day giving updates on how much money they have taken in and how great the bill is working. But the bill is not working so Obama has to try every trick in the book (Constitutional or not) to help this bill along

.

Lets get back to reality shall we, first of all it is a given that the sign up rate will be higher than the paid rate, its a no- brainer for the Republicans to be beating that drum.

The paid rate is only a snapshot in time, it will continue to change through the open enrollment dead line.

The industry average is about 10%, at this point it makes no difference, not till after after open enrollment is over will we know the feasibility.

Bottom line- Impressive sounding talking point, but at this point in time,

<quoted text>Lets get back to reality shall we, first of all it is a given that the sign up rate will be higher than the paid rate, its a no- brainer for the Republicans to be beating that drum.The paid rate is only a snapshot in time, it will continue to change through the open enrollment dead line.The industry average is about 10%, at this point it makes no difference, not till after after open enrollment is over will we know the feasibility.Bottom line- Impressive sounding talking point, but at this point in time,It don't mean shit !!

I see a little insurance lesson is in order. You see Barney, insurance companies don't issue insurance policies until they are paid for in advance. No pay, no coverage. You can tell an insurance agent to get the paperwork started all you want but until that agent clears your check, you don't have insurance therefore you are not enrolled. Now that we are back in reality, you understand that the sign up number means nothing. Until you pay then you are not enrolled. The number that have insurance will always match the number of people that have paid no matter how you try to spin the numbers. Why do you think Obama (and you too for that matter) only give the sign up numbers? Because the enrollment numbers, which Obama and his administration know, are terrible thus the delay in each of the mandates. Though he lies sometimes and tells us that the enrollment number is the same as the sign up number, they are not. Again, you are not enrolled until you pay. Glad I could clear that up for you.

<quoted text>I see a little insurance lesson is in order. You see Barney, insurance companies don't issue insurance policies until they are paid for in advance. No pay, no coverage. You can tell an insurance agent to get the paperwork started all you want but until that agent clears your check, you don't have insurance therefore you are not enrolled. Now that we are back in reality, you understand that the sign up number means nothing. Until you pay then you are not enrolled. The number that have insurance will always match the number of people that have paid no matter how you try to spin the numbers. Why do you think Obama (and you too for that matter) only give the sign up numbers? Because the enrollment numbers, which Obama and his administration know, are terrible thus the delay in each of the mandates. Though he lies sometimes and tells us that the enrollment number is the same as the sign up number, they are not. Again, you are not enrolled until you pay. Glad I could clear that up for you.

LMFAO, that for the most part is what I said. The number that have insur . Always match the number paid ....... OMG......that was a tough one thx for the belly laugh

<quoted text>I see a little insurance lesson is in order. You see Barney, insurance companies don't issue insurance policies until they are paid for in advance. No pay, no coverage. You can tell an insurance agent to get the paperwork started all you want but until that agent clears your check, you don't have insurance therefore you are not enrolled. Now that we are back in reality, you understand that the sign up number means nothing. Until you pay then you are not enrolled. The number that have insurance will always match the number of people that have paid no matter how you try to spin the numbers. Why do you think Obama (and you too for that matter) only give the sign up numbers? Because the enrollment numbers, which Obama and his administration know, are terrible thus the delay in each of the mandates. Though he lies sometimes and tells us that the enrollment number is the same as the sign up number, they are not. Again, you are not enrolled until you pay. Glad I could clear that up for you.

RC heads up for you buddy, you see where I said "paid rate" for all tense and purposes that would be the same as what you are calling the "enrolled"

If I was you I would not be getting the idea you can teach continuing education classes for those who hold a state license to sell health insurance.

So just to be clear, you are happy that just north of 50,000 bought healthcare plans while well over 86,000 new people signed up on the Medicaid expansion of Obamacare? So if those numbers hold true across the country, each person that purchases insurance will have to purchase enough insurance to cover 1.73 people. And knowing this, do you still stick by the claim that costs will go down for those having to purchase insurance? Of course I know (and so do you) that costs have and will continue to skyrocket.

<quoted text>RC heads up for you buddy, you see where I said "paid rate" for all tense and purposes that would be the same as what you are calling the "enrolled"If I was you I would not be getting the idea you can teach continuing education classes for those who hold a state license to sell health insurance.

And if I were you, I would stop lying for Obama by bragging about how many have signed up. FYI, the sign up process isn't complete until you pay and your check clears so until we hear how many have ACTUALLY paid, we don't know how many have ACTUALLY signed up. I know the truth hurts but you should have gotten on the right side of this argument. Until you do, it will be a rocky road for you and a losing proposition.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.