We now move to our December 2012 addition to staggering to imagination atrocities committed by black males against innocent white people. This particular brutal atrocity involves an innocent young white female whose car broke down on a highway during a snow storm. It was a perfect opportunity - a perfect storm - for a black male sexual predator, armed with a gun, to score an easy rape. But this black male predator wasn't going to be satisfied with just a rape.

…while driving down the highway on a snowy day… noticed a young white female off to the side of the road apparently having car trouble. He immediately pulled over. However, black male Harlen was not going to offer to be a Good Samaritan and help this white female. His intent was to rape her, for which he carried a gun for just such an occasion. Harlen exited his vehicle, produced his gun, then forced the white female into her car, where she was beaten and raped. During the ordeal, the white female obviously realized the black male had no intention of letting her live. After the rape... and while the black man was putting his pants on, she fled from the car. She quickly flagged down a passing female motorist. The terrified white female was let in the car and they sped away. However, black male Harlan was not going to let this white female get away.He raced back to his car and went after her. When Harlan reached the car the white female had gotten into, he fired multiple shots at the female driver, striking her twice. The woman driver pulled over, where Harlan got out and grabbed his rape victim by the hair and literally dragged her back to his car. Police found her a few days later badly beaten (over sixty injuries to her body), a fractured skull and a gunshot wound to her head. As for the wounded woman driver, she was left paralyzed for life.

Six black males, unidentified, approached a white female walking alone. She had run out of gas and had went to a gas station with a gas can and bought some gas. The blacks forced her into an alley, doused her with gasoline, then they lit her on fire ... and calmly walked away. Note: Lighting a white female on fire is also a favorite tactic used by black males to cover up a rape. Six black males had this white female all to themselves and we're to believe there was no rape? C'mon...

We now move to our November 2012 addition to staggering to imagination atrocities committed by black males against innocent white people. The brutal atrocity below involves an innocent young white female who was abducted off a public street by a sexually depraved black male. He took her to a secluded area where he repeatedly raped her, beat her, then murdered her.

--------------------------------------------------

>>>Here is the LIST of African American Violence against white people from 1900 to 1964.
--------------------------------------------------

… believed he'd figured out a perfect scheme to rape white females and get away with it. The black male’s plan - ruse - was to use the bump-the-female’s car-from-behind-and-get-her-to-pull-over. When the white female pulled over and got out to check the damage ... Bomar would sucker punch her then drag her to his trunk, and away he'd go. When he finished with the white female, he'd simply murder her. On June 20, 1996 , Bomar waited for a white female he'd watched go into a night club alone. For hours he waited. When the white female exited the club later that night, as planned, Bomar followed ... then rammed her car from behind. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, the white female stopped and got out to check the damage. Naturally, Bomar also stopped and got out of his car. All Bomar had to do was stall until the coast was clear ... to land the sucker punch to the girl's face ... and then carry her to his trunk.

The white female was found in a vacant lot 14 hours later beaten and raped. (Bomar was also charged with abuse of a corpse i.e. he had sex with the white female before and after she was dead).

Note: Less than three weeks before Aimee’s abduction, black male rapist / murderer Bomar pulled the same “bump” ruse to get another white female to pull over, however, she did NOT fall for it. She took his license number and called police. When Police finally caught up with black male rapist / murder Bomar, he was driving a female’s car who was reported missing and presumed dead-- body never found.Before Aimee Wilard's murder, incredibly(!), Bomar was allowed parole on a life sentence for a previous murder conviction (murdered a person over a parking spot!).

…at gunpoint abducted a young white male and female out on a date. They were taken to a secluded area, robbed of their personal effects, then ... "[The white male and white female] were driven to a levee on the Trinity River and pushed down an embankment. Chambers fired five shots at them, then bludgeoned [the white male] in the head with the barrel of the shotgun. Williams choked [the white female] and tried to drown her; Chambers also beat her with the shotgun. "

Monday, October 29, 2012

In this blog, I am going to list only those incidents where white people (the recognized 'Americans' in our time frame of 1900 to 1964) attacked a Negro(es) without cause or provocation, and/ or attacked a negro(es) with violence that far exceeded the offense committed. Incidents will include murder, attempted murder, rape and serious injury. Again, only for the years 1900 to 1964.

------------------------------------------------------>>>Here is the LIST of African American Violence against white people from 1900 to 1964. LINK

------------------------------------------------------Girard, La.- 1901Negro Stole Some Soda Pop ... Then Punched The Proprietor In The Face When The Proprietor Caught Him... And For The Punch In The Face ... The Negro Was LynchedNegro LynchedLouis Thomassource
------------------------------------------------------1902 - Pembroke, KyWhite Male Goes Crazy...Murders Negro Female And Negro "Aged" Male

White male murderer:Lloyd Young

Victims:Rebecca MacRayJoseph Landy
Note: Negroes formed a lynch mob to track down the white male. However, he had already been arrested and was therefore under the protection of the sheriff. This is the only case I can find where a white male, unprovoked, set out to kill innocent negroes. Thousands of cases of blacks doing this sort of thing to innocent white people.source
----------------------------------------------------- 1904 - Eutawville, S. C.

Negro Lynched For Trivial Offense - Ears Cut Off And Riddled With Bullets - Governor Gets Detective Agency Involved To Hunt Down Perps - Five White Men Arrested - Held With No Bail

One Of The MANY Problems Faced By Americans In The Early 1900s Was Disrespectful Behavior Toward Them From Negroes - That is, Negroes Attempting To Establish Black Supremacy By Bullying or Terrorizing White People

A Negro Apparently Walked Up To A White Male And "Pushed" Him To The Ground - Angry Friends Of The Farmer Track Down The Negro... And Then Lynched Him

Lynched NegroMitchell Frazier

Note: The white farmer apparently suffered no serious injury. Seems the local white guys simply would not take such disrespectful behavior from the negro; or, perhaps they were were sick and tired of hearing about this kind of disrespectful behavior from negroes and decided an object lesson should be made of this negro. Either way, a lynchings was way out of line here.

Note: Times being what they were, there was no gov't food programs for the hungry. If someone stole food, the victimized party could starve. So it was a very serious matter to Americans. It was also a common problem for Americans to discover a negro had robbed them. Still, one cow?! Seems a lynching was way out of order here. source
-------------------------------------------------------1908 - Navasota, TX

Negro Pulls Knife On American And Slashes Him - American Mob Gathers and Seizes Negro From Caboose - Then Lynches Him

Note: His victim, who was a white male and County Commissioner, J.T. Barry, was not seriously injured and recovered from his wounds. This crime hardly rises to the level of one usually creating mob violence. However, one must not forget, back in those times, white males in most part of America had NO tolerance for disrespect from the black man.

Night Riders...Terrorize Negro Community - Burn School and Churches(Note: negro rape of a white female appears to be the motive for the terror and burnings. No negro was reported to have been killed or injured)source
------------------------------------------------------1908 - Tifton, Ga.

Black 18-years-Old...Walks Up To Young White Female And Says: "I want you for my sweetheart"...Negro Is Arrested...Then Lynched

Negro Victim:
Charlie LackieNote: Negro was said to be "problem" or troublemaker in the area. Seems to be a case of very persistent harassment.source
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------1908 - Birmingham, Ky.

Note: It was not reported what angered the local whites against the negroes. Night-riders were also know as "whitecaps".source
------------------------------------------------------1908 - Shreveport, La.

Negro Found Not-Guilty In Home Invasion Murder Of White Woman - American Mob Still Lynches Him

Negro Insults White Woman & Threatens White Male -- Mob of 50 White Males Show Up At Negro Cabin...Burns It To Flush Out Negro...Then Guns Down Negro Plus His Family

Victims:
Dave Walker
5-year-old
Mrs. WalkerNote: The murder of three people because of an "insult?" Seems to be more to this incident.source
-----------------------------------------------------1909 - Monroe, La.

Note: This may not fit under the definition of "lynching" as it appears likely that the white male who the negro filed his suit against was the principle in the lynching effort. The white male probably took a few kin folk with him to do the job, which would make this a personal vendetta issue. Source
-----------------------------------------------------1909 - Aiken S. Carolina

Without Provocation American Guns Down Negro - Found Guilty Of Murder - Judge Gives Him $150.00 Dollar Fine

Note: Just what the "insult" was...was not revealed. I doubt it was just a comment. Likely negro grabbed the white female in an inappropriate way.source
-----------------------------------------------------1910

Negro Gunned Down - Unprovoked - Apparently One Of Many White Males Who Hated The Presence Of The Negro In Their City

Victim:
William Smith

Note: White male fled, so his reason(s) for shooting the negro are not known. The negro's companions reported the incident to police. Negro victim said to be in serious cond.source
-----------------------------------------------------1910 - Monroe, LA

Negro Female Abducted From City Jail...Taken To Bridge , Then Thrown Into The River (she is believed to have drowned)

Victim:Laura PorterNote: Negro female, who ran a whorehouse, was accused of staging robberies of white males.source
----------------------------------------------------1910 - Jefferson City , MOTwo Negroes Get Lynched -- They Deliberately Provoked Anger Among Whites By Over Celebrating Black Prize Fighter's Victory In A Boxing Match Over A White Man

Negro Punches American Male In The Face - Mob Forms And Seizes Negro From Town Jail...Then Lynches Him

Over a punch? Negro should have been given the same treatment he dished out - a punch in the face. But a lynching? Maybe white people back then believed if they didn't answer such negro behavior with strong measures...well, it might lead to some primitive negro game where they walk up on a white person and sock him/her in the face for no reason. Nah, couldn't happen -- definitely couldn't happen.source

Note: Apparently, all the negroes who were murdered were considered a threat to the plantation owner, John Williams, who feared they'd squeal to authorities about the working conditions at his plantation. WOW source

------------------------------------------------------1915 - Miss.

Americans Lynch Negro For Being Critical Of How Local White Women Dress

Innocent Negro Lynched By American(?) Mob - Thought He'd Stole A Cow
Apparently, negro Ed Johnson just happened to be at the wrong place and at the wrong time. The wife of a farmer, who was a black noticed her cow missing and assumed it was stolen. Details are lacking, but a mob found Johnson near the scene of the alleged crime and accused him. Despite his protests of innocence, he was hung. The cow that was thought to have been stolen actually just wondered off and was found a few hours after the hanging.Note: Since the cow's owner was a negro, it could very well be that the mob was also negroes. sourcesource
------------------------------------------------------1916 - S. CarolinaSouth Carolina Mob Hunts Down Two Negro Males And Then Lynches Them - The Two Had Passed A Lone White Female And Said "Hello Sweetheart"

A Negro Is Lynched For Disrespectful Behavior Toward A White Man (Well, He Also Attacked Another White Guy With A Hammer -- Apparently In Self-Defense)

Anthony Crawford, 51

"On October 21, 1916, [Anthony] Crawford was taking two loads of cotton and a load of seed into Abbeville and had a disagreement over the price of cottonseed with W.D. Barksdale, a white store owner. After Crawford left the store, one of Barksdale's employees followed him outside and hit him on the head with an ax handle." Wikipedia

Note the word "disagreement" appears in the above narrative as the sole provocation for the white mob violence. Well, a lot more than just a mere "disagreement" is needed to provoke a mob reaction.

--------------------

"Charleston News & Courier (now the Post and Courier) described Crawford as "rich, for a negro, and he was insolent along with it"."

What really happened: Of course, I wasn't there. But I can reasonable read between the lines here - just as you can. Black male Crawford,
who was known to have a short fuse, didn't like the price he was offered for his cottonseed by business owner , W.D. Barksdale. He then became irate and allowed his temper to get the best of him and started insulting Mr. Barkdale. Whereupon Mr. Barksdale ordered Crawford to leave his store. However, a young white employee took exception to the insults hurled at his employer and grabbed an ax handle and went after the Negro. Note: Wikipedia's article on this incident states that Crawford was "hit in the head" with the ax handle. This seems highly unlikely, as that should have rendered any man unconscious. Archived newspaper article below also mentions nothing about Crawford being struck in the head. More likely, the employee was taking wild swings at Crawford and Crawford was defending himself with his arms and yelling for help.

After a policeman arrived at the scene, Crawford, for his own protection, was taken to jail. Crawford should have stayed there. However, with Crawford's surly temperament, one could rightly expect he was indignant with the white sheriff for arresting him and demanded to be released immediately. The sheriff set a high bail of $15.00, probably hoping the Negro did not have the money on him and would therefore have to wait until the following day to get out. Around town, the news of the insulting behavior of the Negro was also getting around.

Again, Crawford should have stayed where he was. Crawford paid the $15.00 fine and was then released, though the sheriff ushered him out the back door, hoping he would not be seen. That, however, was not to be A small group of locals noticed him and decided to teach the Negro a lesson in manners. No one should doubt had Crawford simply submitted to a beating, he at least would have survived -- with a painful lesson learned. But Crawford decided to flee. Crawford was eventually cornered by the mob, whereupon, he decided to grab a hammer to defend himself. Naturally, if the Negro hit any American with that hammer and caused serious injury it would only add to the violence against him. And that's exactly what happened. Crawford struck a guy in the head. Likely, his comrades thought him to be dead. Crawford's fate was now sealed. In the end, he got a terrible beating, then, while he languished in pain at the city jail that night, he was hauled out by a white mob, beat some more, then lynched.

Note: This is the only incident I could find - so far - of such an out-right hate murder by white people. And also the only lynching for the city of Abbeville, S.Carolina from 1900 to 1964. No question about it though, white people in the South back then had a mighty thin skin for disrespectful behavior from the Negro (yes, gone are those days -- i.e. the post civil rights era ...the racist black BULLY reigns supreme...and whatever the racist black BULLY dishes it out - violence, insults, etc. - white people sit back and take it).

Note: This incident happened a day after a negro murdered a white police officer. The prevailing mood of the local white people at that time... obviously they wanted to send a message to the negro criminal element that attacks on white people, including even threating a white person, would be dealt with swiftly.source
------------------------------------------------------May 1919 - Millan, Ga

Elderly Negro Lynched - He'd Shot At White Males Who Came Into The Black Section And Harassed A Negro Woman

Note: No mention of the content of the letter. If it contained anything of sexual nature or a threat of any kind...at this time in American history in some parts of the country ...this was grounds for a lynching - to protect the woman's honor. source

Note: Seems the fight was over a "drinking cup" which was reserved for white men. source
------------------------------------------------------1946 - Georgia

Four Negroes Lynched By American Mob - Including Two Females

"The 1946 Georgia lynching was a quadruple killing that took place in the northern part of the U.S. state of Georgia in the summer of 1946. Done on a bridge in Walton and Oconee counties between Monroe and Watkinsville, the case attracted national attention. While the FBI investigated in 1946, it was unable to prosecute. New publicity in the 1990s led to a new investigation, but the case has not been solved." WikipediaThe most shocking thing about this crime is the lynching of two Negro females and a Negro male, who had nothing to do with the knife attack on the American male (Barnette Hester). Apparently, the American did survive.

Note: Even though a black male did provoke this incident, the retribution for the crime was sickeningly overkill.
----------------------------------------------------------

November 2, 1959 -- Corinth, Miss.

American Boy's 'Prank' Turns Deadly

This one doesn't exactly rise to the level of an atrocity but I'll include it anyways.

Eight American teenagers were driving around when they came across a group of Negro boys. Desiring to have a little "fun" they threw firecrackers at the Negroes. In retaliation, the Negro boys threw rocks at the boy's truck, striking it numerous times. It seems the boys thought it was maybe gunfire. The driver of the truck, teenager, Darnell Glidewll, 16, either went home to retrieved a shotgun or had one in his truck. He then fired it in the direction of two Negro boys, who apparently were not part of the Negro group who threw the stones. The blast mortally wounded one of the boys and slightly wounded the other. Glidewell was sentenced to five years in state prison.

Note: Local Americans took up a collection drive and gave $150.00 to the parents of the deceased boy. Neither before compulsory integration (July 2, 1964) nor after it, is there one recored example where African-Americans ever took up a collection for the injured or dead American (white) victim of a black crime.

Four White Males Gang Rape Black Female - Each Sentenced To Life In Prison

Four American males, William Collinsworth, Ollie Stoutamire, Patrick Scarborough, and David Beagles, apparently in a premeditated scheme, decided to rape a Negro female. With a shotgun the four approached a car with four Negro occupants (two males and two females). One Negro female, Betty Jean Owens, was abducted and taken to a secluded place ... where all four proceeded to rape her repeatedly.

For unknown reasons, the American boys allowed the other three Negroes to go on their way. They went straight to the police. A "group" (unknown number) of American police officers went looking for the Negro girl. They found her in the back seat of the assailants' car (wiki states she was discovered "bound and gagged" but this likely wasn't the case, since there were four assailants i.e. no reason to bind and gag her - where could she go?). The four American males were arrested, convicted, then given life prison terms.

Note: Had these rapists did their deed in Virginia, they likely would have faced the same fate the Martinsville Seven faced:: the death penalty.

Also of Note: From wiki:: "In 1965, David Beagles was paroled. Four years after he was released, he tracked down an African American woman that he thought was Owens and murdered her and buried her in a shallow grave. However, he murdered Betty Jean Robinson Houston, an entirely different woman."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betty_Jean_Owens

---------------------------------------------------------------

August 28, 1955 -- Money, Mississippi

14-Year-old Emmit Till's Abduction And Murder

First things first. Let's debunk the legend of Emmett Till as the happy-go-lucky young little Negro boy who, while walking casually down the street, whistled at a white women. And for THAT act, a mob of white males abducted the Negro boy, then executed him. This version is woefully inaccurate.THE REAL VERSION:: Emmett Till was no "little boy." Though he was 14-years-old he stood 5"8' (not 5"4' as Wikipedia states) and weighed 150 lbs. That is, Till looked older than his 14-years. Emmitt Till lived in Chicago. Emmett Till was in Money, Mississippi, with his mother visiting her brother. That Till lived in Chicago is important. While Till most likely could get away with (did get away with?) grabbing white females and manhandling them in Chicago (apparently he went to an integrated school), in Mississippi, there was an entirely different culture regarding interaction of males and females. In the South at this time, Americans still observed a long tradition of respecting and protecting womanhood, and males were expected to act against any violators. Emmett Till, prodded by other young Negro boys, crossed the line. For this he was abducted and murdered by two American males.Flashpoint:: On a hot August day, Emmett Till met up with some young Negro boys (younger than him) in Money, MS. Till's new friends (if one could actually call them 'friends'), no doubt out of boredom, cooked up a prank to play on him. It involved a bet (for a reported 25 cents) to go up to a white female and either ask her for a date or get her to come over to them. Till's little friends were playing with fire here. They knew it. They also knew that Emmit Till, should anything go wrong, would be the fall guy. Till, unfamiliar with the ways of the South, and also likely wanting to impress his little friends, as well as pocket .25c, took the bet. Carolyn Bryant, an attractive 21-year-old American female who worked at a store where Emmett Till and his friends were hanging out, was selected as the one Till was to approach.Carolyn's gives her account of the what happened next:"Carolyn Bryant later asserted that Till had grabbed her at the waist and asked her for a date. She said the young man also used "unprintable" words."The American female, frightened out of her skin by the grabbing and insistence of the Negro, broke free from his grasp and raced to her truck to get a gun. Yes, a gun. That's how terrified she was (no little boy of 5' 4" could have cause that level of freight). At this point, Till and his buddies ran from the scene. Till should have received a strong talk about the ways of the South ... and that should have been the end of it. However, two American males, John William "J. W." Milam and Roy Bryant, 24, who was the husband of Carolyn Bryant, decided stronger measures were called for. After Milam and Bryant found out it was Till who assaulted and terrorize his wife, in the late night hours they ( along with two Negro men) went out to the house where he was staying and at gunpoint abducted him.

Emmett Till was found three days later submerged in a lake with a bullet wound in his head.Though the prosecutor seemed to have an ironclad case of guilt, an all-American jury refused to convict the two. Bryan and Milam never spent a day in jail for this crime. A year later in an article for a magazine, both admitted they killed Emmett Till.

Note: Though Emmett Till's own actions created the provocation for his murder (likely the main reason the all-American jury acquitted the two American males), still, since we're dealing with the action of a young boy, I believe the age of the boy outweighs the provocation here. This incident rises pretty close to an atrocity.BTW, if you believe black boys at Emmett Tills age are just too young to rape, rob or murder, here's a LINK to dispel that myth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------September 15, 1963 -- Birmingham, AL

Church Bombing - Four Negro Girls Die

There's something VERY fishy about this one. I'm looking into before I give a crime report. BTW, there's no question these girls were killed by bomb planted at a Negro church. But who really planted the bomb? Stay tuned...

Thursday, October 25, 2012

The Beginning Of Industrialization & Urbanization (1900) in America -- Americans create industries, elevate their standard of living and make America into a world power - Negroes founder Page I If one were to follow the Negro race's migration to America's urban centers past Reconstruction, through the 1880s, past Plessy vs. Ferguson (1896) and up until the beginning of the 20th century, a very puzzling, if not worrisome, dilemma had clearly begun to materialize:: Within America's urban centers Negro males' behavioral characteristics during this time (1865 to 1900) were showing themselves to be very much different than the creators of those urban centers i.e. males of Euro descent. Specifically, in the area of crime Negroes males had become disproportionately represented.1 Regarding the family unit, there was a significant difference between the American (White Christians) and the Negro in cohabitation of the sexes, with Negro families being far more likely living without an adult male in the house; which, naturally, produced greater instability for the Negro family unit.2 And regarding urban housing, Negroes simply chose to occupy a dwellings built by American males ... instead of building housing for their people.3 Finally, in generating occupations, the most crucial area for a male group within urban settings, and particularly at this time (circa 1900) in American history - an economic system dominated by the rules of capitalism... as opposed to socialism and gov't produced jobs -- Negro males had failed completely between 1865 and 1900 in producing the occupational titles within the structure and confines of their own male group; which was essential to sustain their still small urban populations.4In fact, in this crucial area of Negro males generating occupations, one can easily see a contributing factor for the other failings represented above for the Negro. For it stands to reason, if black males generated the same type of jobs in urban centers as the Americans, the crime rates associated with their group should fall, the family structure would be more stable and they could afford to buy and build more suitable housing; and, theoretically anyways, they should also be building their own cities/ town and political systems and launching their own industries.5 And lastly, if Negro males were generating enough occupations for their own male group, they would also demonstrate to the Americans that they were not going to become their dependents - certainly a major concern for any American male watching the Negro group's urban desolation manifest during our time frame here (1865 to 1900). ----------------------------------The first four citations below are referenced from W.E.B. Du Bois' book, The Philadelphia Negro (1896) - available FREE on the Internet as a google book ),1. Du Bois Quote:"In the city of Philadelphia the increasing number of bold and daring crimes committed by Negroes [since 1890] has focused the city on this subject. There is a widespread feeling that something is wrong with a race that is responsible for so much crime, and that strong remedies are called for. One has to but visit the corridors of the public buildings, when the courts are in session, to realize the part played in law-breaking by the Negro." (pg. 241) 2. Du Bois gives very startling, if not staggering to the imagination, facts about the black family situation in urban Philadelphia in the late 1890s. For instance, 73% of all black females over the age of 40 are living without a man. For White women, it was under 16%. He also tells us that for the black female who marries in Philadelphia, 56% of them are either separated, abandoned, divorced or widowed. (pg.70). Du Bois also holds no punches on the "sexual looseness" of the Negro, which he calls the "sin of the Negro population". (pg. 72)3. Du Bois states that the vast majority of blacks were either living in, or juxtaposed to, the Seventh Ward in Philadelphia in 1896, This ward was the oldest section of the city and, not surprisingly, the poorest section of the city.(pg. 305) Blacks had been in the city of Philadelphia, according to Du Bois, stretching all the way back to the 1700. So the fact that so very few - if any - housing in the city was built by black males, seems to indicate an acutely obvious, if not potentially serious, difference manifesting between the two races in the city. Further, even stretching our parameter years from 1865 to 1964, I still could not find ANY urban area in Americawhere a section of housing was built by black males. 4. Du Bois breaks down the jobs found among Philadelphia's Negro male age age 10 to 20, which indicates over 80% of the males appear to be making their daily wage in the service sector (as a porter, servant, errand boy or common laborer) for the American population (white people); or providing services where the predominant clientèle is American. (pg. 99).For Negro men over the age the age of 21, Du Bois tells us that in 1896, approx. 79% of the adult Negro males are either laborers or servants. This also suggests that here again, we see the Negro male group engaged in occupations where the incomes are most likely derived from the white population.(pg. 99)As for the Negro female, Du Bois tells us that a peculiarly high percent (43%) are the family breadwinner in Philadelphia, compared to 16% for White women. The vast majority of Negro women work as domestic servants.(pg.111) Further, according to Du Bois, there were approx. 42,000 domestic servants in Philadelphia, However, blacks represented only 25% of these servants. This fact clearly indicates White people could have easily filled the ranks of this job classification with their own race. And the point here is? White people were giving these jobs to blacks ... clearly desiring to help them, likely keenly aware what hardship blacks were enduring in the city.On pg 123, Mr. Du Bois offers us an accounting of Negro business and employment activities within Philadelphia, particularly how blacks tend to gravitate to the White race when seeking economic opportunities, instead of seeking opportunities among their own male group.On pg. 135, Du Bois describes how White organizers of labor groups use the vast numbers of Negroes, with so limited opportunities known to be available to them, to drive down wages for white males.5. Black males in America by 1900 still have yet to create an urban center independent of the White males; nor have they establish a single industry - created by and run by Negroes - in any part of the country.Pg.1

----------------------------------- The Emerging Differences Between White & BlackPage IISo we have a question here that obviously begs to be asked at this point in American history (1900): Why were enough occupational titles capable of being generated in American communities to sustain their urban population but the Negro community was failing in this regard?Even though the question above seems to be of monumental importance, indeed, related to the very survival of Negro people in urban America -- remember, since the American and the Negro lived separately, each male group was expected to be self-reliant; and this self-reliance is directly linked to the creation of occupational titles within one's own male group. Nevertheless, the question regarding why Negro men failed to produce occupations is never directly asked, either by members of the U.S. gov't (who were all white males in 1900), or members of academia. At least I could find no person of renown in these ranks raising this issue prior to 1900. Curious indeed! In attempting to answer this question though, let's first address the four most popular arguments used to explain the Negro's failure in American urban centers::1. Legacy of Slavery:: The notion that slavery was at the root cause for every socio-economic problem that plagued the Negro male group in 1900, though it seems to have some merit (i.e. those of African descents had no culture to fall back on to instruct themselves on how to create a societal structure based on their own historical past), however, slavery could not possibly be the reason for all the economic hardships in every urban center in which they (the Negro male group) clustered. 2. The "conspiring to oppress" theory, or myth:;
This implies that the American population in every urban area in which the Negro male migrated collectively conspired and schemed to oppressed him. This is not only false but obviously completely ludicrous. Coast to coast "hidden" oppression?! And for the entire history of the Negro's presence in urban America? Logically, if white people were this obsessed with oppressing the Negro, the Negro people were entirely FREE - after 1865 - to colonize a place in America. Or, free to build their own cities and towns.6 BOTTOM LINE:: There was no oppression of the black race in America after 1865. There was, however, historical "group" separation. Blacks in 1900 were required to live separately so as to achieve a sense of self-reliance.

3.Intellectual superiority:;There are no people intellectually superior to another people. Keeping in mind the above observations (slavery cannot possibly be the cause for all the Negro's urban desolation; no conspiracy to oppress; and there is no intellectually superior race), and taking further note that the Negro male group between 1865 and 1900 had essentially been given access to the same educational training as American males,7 and this male group has also only been exposed to the way of life of the Dominant Male Group (White Christian males) in America, then their failure to exhibit the same behavioral characteristics as the Americanwithin the urban centers ... leaves us with really only one remaining consideration: the possibility that some innate factor exists within the human species which allows for a grouping behavior conducive to creating "wealth" and thereby sustaining urban living arrangements. 8Note: In 1900, according to the U.S. Census, the Negro populationwas 8,833,994, and 87% of the Negroes still lived in the South. The total urban black population in America was 11%.
Between 1900 and 1960, NEVER in human history had a single society experienced such economic prosperity than America. As of 1960:--total number of cities built by Negro males : None--total number of industries built by Negro males: None--total number of tax bases created by black males capable of sustaining gov't services: None--number of white males & females employed by a black man and supporting a family: None--number of black males & females employed by a white person (household/corporation/business): Millions-- total number of residential housing structures built by black males in major metropolitan centers: Number so minute it is statistically immeasurable--total number of black male registered businesses:: 34, 400 (in other words, only .0043 of all adult black males owned their own business in 1960 - all are mom & pop operations. Source: Chronological History of the Negro -pg 523)The purpose in pointing out the above is only to demonstrate the great difference in the behavioral characteristics of the two racial groups; and to make one wonder today how it is that the dominant culture (white Christians) at that time could not or would not conclude that those of African descent were NOT an urban people.Finally, it is not the fault of one people that another people exhibited demonstrably different behavioral characteristics in the same living arrangements (i.e. America's urban centers). This is not an intelligence issue. Nor is it a conspiracy to oppress issue; or a lingering legacy of a GREAT wrong committed by one people against another. Like the polar bear and black bear, Euro honey bee and Africanized honey bee, the lion, the leopard and tiger, tho these species are part of the same family (the bear family; the bee family; the cat family), yet each is separated from the other by their innate behavioral characteristics.http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0027/tab05.txt -----------------------------------6. Below are four examples where male groups
in America prior to 1900
sought and achieved separation from America's Dominant Male Group (White Christian males) and created their own self-sustaining and self-reliant living arrangements.Example 1 : In 1847, in Nauvoo, Illinois, a few thousands Mormons, persecuted and reviled by many of their fellow Americans because of their “peculiar” religious beliefs (comparatively, people of African descent were, generally speaking, not hated, nor were they persecuted, for their racial difference by America's DMG - they only desired Negroes live separately), and even suffering the murder of their spiritual leader, John Smith, decide to head West. They marched through the desert and eventually wound up in the unsettled territory of Utah. There they set up their community in this virtual desert wasteland and proceeded to build irrigation systems, the city of Salt Lake and, eventually, other towns as well. They even had their own currency.Example 2 :Every American Indian tribe demanded their separation and distinctness. Not one Indian tribe in America - out of 100s - is known to have ever marched before another Indian tribe for integration rights. They all achieved self-reliance and wanted nothing to do "with the way of the white man."

Example 3 : Chinese-Americans began arriving in the late 1880s and they were essentially required to live separately, which they did without complaint. They also created their own living arrangements within the confines of their own male group. Further, there is no recorded example of any Chinese-American ever claiming his dignity, freedom or manhood, or that of his people, could only be obtained within White male society.Example 4 : The Amish.-------------------------------------------Citations:7.Negroes were more than adequately supplied with schools, including higher education facilities, which were mostly supplied - funded - by the northern liberal White people. READ : The Unheralded Charity of White toward Black in American History8.Failure of the Carlisle Indian School

-------------------------------------------

So here is were we left off :: "some innate factor exists within the human species which allows for a grouping behavior conducive to creating [wealth] and sustaining urban living arrangements." To be continued on pg. 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Followers

Regrettable

Regarding the four pages Victims List::
How quickly the names and faces of victims of racial violence disappear, and for so many of the young victims we tend to forget they had such a long life to live, a contribution to make, a family to raise and a right to pursue life, have liberty and achieve happiness.