Women’s boxing more technical than men and less brutal

LONDON — People who think boxing is too violent would like Olympic boxing, particularly the women. There are very few knockdowns, even fewer knockouts. The headgear is massive. So are the gloves. Also, the women’s game is much more technical. It really is a clash of strategies rather than brute savagery.

“The women are more disciplined than most of the men,” U.S. assistant coach Charles Leverette said. “Across the board, boxing is boxing but women do listen a little bit better and try to execute over the guys. Some of the guys have their ways and they have their ways. And women are a little more acceptable.”

Why is it that there seems to be so many men tripping all over themselves to announce the inferiority of men such as the article above claims women are better than men even at what has heretofo been something only men did? Apparently women only need a little practice to excel over men these days.. I have recently read where a male coach claimed women are more suited to boxing and weightlifting then men! Than I read ads written to ecourage women into being plumbers, electriticans, and auto mehanics and heavey equipment opperators and construction. In every report all written by men the claim was made that women have some special abilities of course that men don’t have that enables women to naturaly excel over men in these trades! then of course their is that king of male bashers Dan Abrams who has written a book called “Man Down” in which he suspposedly colected data showing women excell over their male counterparts in all businesses and occupations. There doesn’t seem to be anything that men are any good at these days. One wonders how it can possibly be true that as the women claim men have dominated them? How can inferior males dominate superior females? If true than there is atleast one thing men do better than women and that is men are better at domination but I am sure no man will refute this one because its not flattering to women