“Prodded by the looming CableGate, Clinton met with staff on Tuesday November 23, 2010 shortly after 8 a.m. on Mahogany Row at the State Department to attempt to formulate a strategy to avert Assange’s plans to release an enormous batch of 250,000 secret cables, dating from 1966 to 2010. Assange had professed for months to rain the internal cables down on Clinton and President Obama. The collective fear was the context of the secret cables would hamper U.S. intelligence gathering and compromise private correspondences and intelligence shared with foreign governments and opposition leaders. Splashing such juicy details on television news shows and the front pages of major newspapers in the country was great for the media but lousy for intelligence and foreign policy. Many, including Clinton and her elected boss, expressed fear these revelations would embarrass and expose intelligence allies of the United States and set America’s already fragile foreign policy back decades.

“By its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement responding to Wikileaks’ anticipated tidal wave release of intelligence. “It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions.”

Clinton’s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assange’s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administration’s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables. Hence, Clinton’s early morning November meeting of State’s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination. That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said. Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assange’s previous 2010 records releases, divulging secret U.S. documents about the war in Afghanistan in July and the war in Iraq just a month earlier in October, sources said. At that time in 2010, Assange was relatively free and not living cloistered in in the embassy of Ecuador in London. Prior to 2010, Assange focused Wikileaks’ efforts on countries outside the United States but now under Clinton and Obama, Assange was hammering America with an unparalleled third sweeping Wikileaks document dump in five months. Clinton was fuming, sources said, as each State Department cable dispatched during the Obama administration was signed by her.”

“Immediately following the conclusion of the wild brainstorming session, one of Clinton’s top aides, State Department Director of Policy Planning Ann-Marie Slaughter, penned an email to Clinton, Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and aides Huma Abebin and Jacob Sullivan at 10:29 a.m. entitled “an SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re Wikileaks.”

“Nonlegal strategies.” How did that phrasing make it into an official State Department email subject line dealing with solving Wikileaks and Assange? Why would the secretary of state and her inner circle be discussing any “nonlegal strategies” for anything whatsoever? Against anyone? Shouldn’t all the strategies discussed by the country’s top diplomat be strictly legal only? And is the email a smoking gun to confirm Clinton was actually serious about pursuing an obvious “nonlegal strategy” proposal to allegedly assassinate Assange? Numerous attempts were made to try and interview and decipher Slaughter’s choice of email wording, however, she could not be reached for comment. Insiders said Slaughter is keeping a “low profile” in Princeton, NJ until she is nominated for a position in Clinton’s cabinet if the Democrat is elected in November. Likewise, True Pundit attempted to contact Mills, Abedin, and Sullivan for their perspectives on this story. None commented on the record.

Slaughter’s cryptic email also contained an attached document called “SP Wikileaks doc final11.23.10.docx.” That attachment portion of Slaughter’s “nonlegal strategies” email has yet to be recovered by federal investigators and House committee investigators probing Clinton’s email practices while at State. Even Wikileaks does not have the document. Slaughter, however, shed some light on the attachment: “The result is the attached memo, which has one interesting legal approach and I think some very good suggestions about how to handle our public diplomacy.”

But did it also include details on the “nonlegal strategies” teased in the subject line?”

““Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources.”…True Pundit Oct 3, 2016

“Wikileaks has abruptly canceled a much-anticipated announcement on Tuesday, according to NBC News. The announcement had been expected to be founder Julian Assange’s long-promised document dump on Hillary Clinton.

NBC’s Jesse Rodriguez reported that the Tuesday announcement — which was to come from the balcony of London’s Ecuadorian Embassy, where Assange has sought sanctuary for years – was canceled due to “security concerns”.

Follow
Jesse Rodriguez ✔ @JesseRodriguez
Due to security concerns at the Ecuadorian Embassy, Julian Assange’s balcony announcement on Tues has been cancelled, per @wikileaks
12:50 PM – 30 Sep 2016
513 513 Retweets 261 261 likes
Follow
Jesse Rodriguez ✔ @JesseRodriguez
Julian Assange set to make an announcement from his balcony in London next Tuesday, according to @WikiLeaks
12:15 PM – 27 Sep 2016
773 773 Retweets 733 733 likes
Wikileaks has not said when it will now make its “announcement”.”

“Clinton could not recall a specific process for nominating a target for a drone strike and recalled much debate pertaining to the concurrence process. Clinton knew there was a role for DOD, State and the CIA but could not provide specifics as to what it was. Due to a disagreement between these agencies, Clinton recalled having many discussions related to nominating an individual for a drone strike. When Clinton exchanged classified information pertaining to the drone program internally at State, it was in her office or on a secure call. When Clinton exchanged classified information pertaining to the drone program externally it was at the White House. Clinton never had a concern with how classified information pertaining to the drone program was handled.”

Sources said Clinton’s comments on neutralizing Assange fits a pattern of callousness when combined with the FBI testimony that she often considered droning individuals and then coupled with her reaction to Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi’s death in Oct. 2011.

Gaddafi was tortured and killed, largely due to Clinton’s maneuvering in the Middle East and Libya. During a sit down interview with CBS News, a Clinton aide notified the room during a taping break of news reports that Gaddafi had been dragged throughout the streets of Libya and ultimately killed. Unaware the camera was still rolling, a jovial and proud Clinton pronounced: “We came. We saw. He died.” This was Clinton’s initial response to the dictator’s demise. A cackling Clinton was then joined in laughter by the CBS correspondent and off-camera aides and staff. Again, more proof of a disturbing habit of treating human life as a disposable commodity like a soiled diaper.”

“After canceling a planned announcement from the balcony of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London (due to security concerns), Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is now planning to appear via video link Tuesday morning at Wikileak’s tenth anniversary celebration in Berlin.

Sources close to the event tell Heat Street that Assange may be planning to release some new information his organization has obtained about the U.S. Democratic Party. But Heat Street has yet to receive independent confirmation that Assange plans to dump information specifically on Hillary Clinton.

The news that Assange plans to appear (remotely) in Berlin comes after Wikileaks abruptly canceled a much-anticipated announcement in London that was to be made from the balcony of London’s Ecuadorian Embassy, where Assange has sought sanctuary for years. The cancelation was first reported by NBC News. According to NBC’s Jesse Rodriguez, the announcement was canceled due to “security concerns”.”

You posted….”“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources.”…True Pundit Oct 3, 2016″
———————————————————————————————
This would be nothing to the Clinton’s who have a ‘body count” now close to 70…..just ‘drone’ the Equardorian Embassy…just a small thing for the Clinton’s …..

But Assange is smarter than both of these crooked bastards put together …. Hillary will go down, and stay down, for the count of 10 this week ……

It has been promised and it will be delivered ! The truth cannot be hidden forever !

**Hillary Clinton IS A MURDERER and has NO ISSUE speaking openly about these things (Behind closed doors) She is a PSYCHOPATH!!! She is a Sociopath. LOCK HER UP! Arrest her before she starts random war on “us”**

WE HAVE OFTEN WONDERED WHY OBAMA IS, AND WILL FOREVER PROTECT CLINTON….COULD THIS BE THE REASON ?

An old saying; “BIRDS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER”…..

To understand the question I have posed above, you must read the entire article I will post herein. It concerns a trip Hillary Clinton took to England, specifically in August of 2009. Her trip was limited to ONLY a visit to the Chief Executive of the Office of the ‘British Foreign and Commonwealth Office’; This is the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from Colonial Protectorates. She would speak ONLY with this Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009.

Please note: OVERSEAS PUBLIC RECORDS FROM COLONIAL PROTECTORATES. This is very important in this post. African news agency expressed GREAT surprise at Clinton’s arrival in England since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.
Now a logical thinking person would asking and begging the question; “What the hell was she doing in Great Britain asking questions at the office that has the responsibility of safeguarding the records of births/deaths/ and other vital records contained in the office of the British Foreign and Commonwealth of anyone born/ or living in the colonies of England? … especially those of Africa !
Follow with me on this one closely, please. Obama took office, as president , on January 20, 2009. Clinton took office, one day later, as Obama’s Secretary of State on 21 January 2009. Are things beginning to smell for you yet ? OK… here’s some more backup.
Then Clinton scheduled a ten day African trip for August of 2009. A short 6 months later….but in addition, she took a slight surprise detour to England before going to Africa. She decided to visit, and LIMITED her visit to no where but the Chief Executive of the BRITISH OFFICE OF FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE…… are you beginning to connect the dots yet ? … need some more hard evidence …OK, let’s continue down this rabbit hole.
Did Hillary Clinton pay a visit to the Chief Executive of the ‘British Office of Foreign and Commonwealth’ affairs strictly to ‘scrub’, or strictly limit access to the real birth records of Barack H Obama from the files of England ? …. of course she did. Or did she make this surprise visit to that British government office in order to collect future evidence and have solid proof of her skull-duggery for later use ?
Now would that be a great reason for Obama to be now protecting Hillary, and all the stinking doo-doo she has stepped in over the past four years ? …. You bet it would !!!
Obama knows if he let’s Hillary go down over her carelessness and traitorous acts , or if he throws her under the bus because she has been so stupid… he too will be under that bus with her….
Because she went to the British governmental office that had complete control over vital records of all births/deaths in the colonies under British control…..that included Kenya, she will now be fully protected by Obama !
Now the question that arises and should also be ask here is ; did Obama know that Clinton was making that surprise visit to England ? Did he specifically ask her to go there and scrub his records ? Or was this an “original Killary” act of contrition she devised on her own ? ….. I say it was an original on her own…..she wanted to get some ” group insurance” to use against Obama when, and if, the time got real bad for her ! …and she got it, and in the process, she closed any loop holes to others who would be seeking access to that same information.
And now is the time for her to cash in that “insurance policy”!
Here is the full article explaining what I have just written about; … it has been documented and is true in all details;
—————————————————————————-
WHERE LIES GO TO DIE – Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office, and the Kew branch of British National Archives.
Editors note: The records alluded to in this story were discovered through a May, 2012 search through BMD Registers, a BNA partner site, using the search term “Obama”. Corroborating evidence through public sources only implicates the identity of those involved but does not explicitly prove their identity in the absence of the availability of original documents.)
By Dan Crosby
of The Daily Pen
KEW, SURREY, GB – The last place anyone would think to look for a birth record of someone claiming to be a “natural born” U.S. citizen is Great Britain. The very inclusion of the Article II eligibility mandate in the U.S. Constitution was explicitly intended by the founding fathers of America to prevent a then British-born enemy usurper from attaining the office of the U.S. presidency and thereby undermining the sovereignty of the newly formed nation.
In the absence of honor, courage and justice on the part of those serving in the U.S. Congress and Federal Judiciary, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case investigative group has concluded the only law enforcement analysis of the image of Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth” posted to a government website in April, 2011 and found it to be the product of criminal fraud and document forgery.
The seeming endless evidence against Obama has now taken investigators to the foreign archives of Great Britain wherein it has been discovered that vital events occurring under the jurisdiction of the British Colony in the Protectorate of East Africa prior to 1965 were recorded and held in the main office of the British Registrar in England until 1995 before being archived in the BNA.
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
Recall, investigative journalists working for Breitbart.com have already discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama’s literary agent in which he claimed he was born in Kenya. Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly. Since then information on Obama’s ties has been curtailed by government officials as the Obama administration has coincidently paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in … you guessed it….Kenya.
Also, the presence of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted for from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama, until three weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961 when she allegedly applied for college courses at the University of Washington. Theories about her whereabouts have included that she participated in the Air Lift America project as an exchange student and traveled to Nairobi as one of many recent highschool graduates (see AASF Report 1959-1961).
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).
The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives. According to researchers, Obama’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.
However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.
Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clinton’s arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.
—————————————————————————
So … are there still any blind and ignorant fools out there in ‘la-la land’ that believe Barack Hussan Obama is, or was ever, a “natural-born citizen” as defined by our Constitution… and qualified according to that document to hold the office of president ? And if so… why doesn’t ‘any’ hospital in Hawaii claim the honor of his worthy birth and place a bronze plaque over their doorstep commerating his royal entrance into this world ?
The answer is very simple my friends ….. because he wasn’t born in Hawaii, and he isn’t a “natural-born citizen” and perhaps not even a citizen of these United States at all !!!
We have had a Usurper sitting on our highest throne in America for the past 8 years ! And no one has gave a ‘tinker’s damn’ that he was there !!!
We were warned by our Founding Fathers that this could occur in our future, and now it has…. but we didn’t listen !

Just like all the other ‘shithole’ in the middle east, Paris is becoming the ‘shithole’ of Europe….just think, Obama and Clinton want to bring this to our America….

In Paris, you get a fine for throwing a cigarette butt on the ground.
However if you are an immigrant, just make yourself at home.
Everyone needs to repost this so the Liberals can see what America will become if Hillary gets in office

oldsoldier80,
……..as you may know I am of British extraction myself. About a decade hence, I established contact with a researcher in England to research my own family. He was well connected via University of Nottingham because he taught at that institution. In 2009 I again contacted him and asked if he would consider doing some additional research. He advised that he would accept a query. I provided him with the pertinent information regarding Barry Soetoro, who was allegedly born as Barack H Obama. I paid a pretty POUND for the information which I received several months later.
What you have provided here is extremely close to what he provided. The primary difference being largely punctuation, and some choice of words. He did NOT REVEAL the source of the data, but suggested that the National Repository at Islington is also sanctuary to the same information, but it requires a special order from a magistrate to receive what is considered privileged information. Apparently he was able to somehow skirt the legal requirements. He and his wife immigrated to Denmark in 2010. I have subsequently lost all contact with him.

oldsoldier80……..
………as soon as I completed reading his communication I destroyed all of the correspondence, no matter how seemingly insignificant. What I have often stated in this blog is my own choice of words, but relates with what I learned in late 2009. Further it has been my own reasoning which tells me that all avenues of legal relief are blocked. The judicial arm of our Federal Government is completely corrupted. This deliberate blocking became well known as the lady LAWYER in California so clearly demonstrated. ( which once cost her over $20,000.00 in illegal fines by the bastards.) She has been nearly as quiet as a church mouse lately………anybody wonder why? She was either ADVISED ,or she figured out that her life could come to an abrupt halt………….or I guess we could refer to it as being “FUDDYISED”. THAT IS ALSO LOOKED UPON AS …..INCENTIVE.
As much as I despise what is happening, it is painfully clear now that ONLY the FOURTH BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT CAN NOW RETRIEVE OUR COUNTRY. I HAVE SERIOUS DOUBTS ABOUT THAT EVER HAPPENING. FORTUNATELY FOR ME MY PULMONARY FIBROSIS IS NOW MOVING FASTER, AND GOD WILLING I WILL SOON BE DEAD AND GONE.

oldsoldier80…..
………..I hasten to add, that if Hillary obtained the pertinent data regarding Soetoro, she may be holding it for her own protection……IF, OR WHEN the game turns into DOWN, AND DIRTY. (SHE CAN WAVE THE OBAMA KENYA BC IN THE AIR AND PUBLISH IT, WHICH WILL END THE BULLSHI# BEING PERPETRATED BY ALL OF THE CHICAGO (CAPONE TYPE OF BASTARDS.) HOWEVER I BELIEVE THAT SHE WOULD PROBABLY BE FUDDYISED VERY EARLY ON.

“As much as I despise what is happening, it is painfully clear now that ONLY the FOURTH BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT CAN NOW RETRIEVE OUR COUNTRY. I HAVE SERIOUS DOUBTS ABOUT THAT EVER HAPPENING. FORTUNATELY FOR ME MY PULMONARY FIBROSIS IS NOW MOVING FASTER, AND GOD WILLING I WILL SOON BE DEAD AND GONE.”

*****************

oldsailor84,
I hope this doesn’t mean that you will be returning to vote democrat. lol

Stick around we need all hands on deck to fight these crooks, and the Muslim Brotherhood invasion, led by the usurper liar, and the crooked Clintons, sponsored by Muslims, and the Muslim Brotherhood, aka Huma.

oldsoldier80,
Yes he is a usurper, he was never eligible to even be on the ballot, he was never a natural born Citizen, and based on what is known, he is not a US Citizen, and has no right to be president, he is a usurper, and an illegal president, all covered for by RICO Regime democrats, and idiots that can’t believe fraud on this scale is possible.