Thoughts on Life, Love, Politics, Hypocrisy and Coming Out in Mid-Life

Friday, April 13, 2018

The Paul Ryan Story: From Flimflam to Fascism

Retiring House Speaker Paul Ryan has always pretended to be a good, devout Catholic, true to the Church's teachings, yet throughout his years in Congress he has pursued an agenda that has sought to shred the Church's social gospel and which has unrelentingly sought to harm the poor, the hungry, the sick and the homeless which seeking to shower huge tax cuts and benefits on the very wealthy. To say that Ryan is a complete hypocrite is beyond an understatement. Of course, he has been in good company with a majority of Republicans who not only ignored the Christian values they claimed to champion but also sold their souls to Donald Trump, perhaps one of the most immoral individuals in America. They were aided in this trashing of morality by evangelical Christians who deserve to be viewed by history as a pestilence on America. Lastly, they were all aided and abetted by a large portion of the pundit class who always pretended that there was a false equivalency between the ugly agenda of the right and the compassionate agenda of the left. A column in the New York Times looks at the realty of Paul Ryan. Here are highlights:

Why
did Paul Ryan choose not to run for re-election? What will be the consequences?
Your guess is as good as mine . . . On the other hand, I do have some insight
into how Ryan — who has always been an obvious con man, to anyone willing to
see — came to become speaker of the House. And that’s a story that reflects
badly not just on Ryan himself, not just on his party, but also on
self-proclaimed centrists and the news media, who boosted his career through
their malfeasance.

Incredibly,
I’m seeing some news reports about his exit that portray him as a serious
policy wonk and fiscal hawk who, sadly, found himself unable to fulfill his
mission in the Trump era. Unbelievable.

Look,
the single animating principle of everything Ryan did and proposed was to
comfort the comfortable while afflicting the afflicted. Can anyone name a
single instance in which his supposed concern about the deficit made him
willing to impose any burden on the wealthy, in which his supposed compassion
made him willing to improve the lives of the poor?

[H]is
“deficit reduction” proposals were always frauds. The revenue loss from tax cuts
always exceeded any explicit spending cuts, so the pretense of fiscal
responsibility came entirely from “magic asterisks”: extra revenue from closing
unspecified loopholes, reduced spending from cutting unspecified programs. I
called him a flimflam man back in 2010, and nothing he has done
since has called that judgment into question.

So
how did such an obvious con artist get a reputation for seriousness and fiscal
probity? Basically, he was the beneficiary of ideological affirmative action.

Even
now, in this age of Trump, there are a substantial number of opinion leaders .
. . whose professional brands, rest on the notion that they stand above the
political fray. For such people, asserting that both sides have a point, that
there are serious, honest people on both left and right, practically defines
their identity.

Centrists
who couldn’t find real examples of serious, honest conservatives lavished
praise on politicians who played that role on TV. Paul Ryan wasn’t actually
very good at faking it; true fiscal experts ridiculed his “mystery meat” budgets. But never mind: The
narrative required that the character Ryan played exist, so everyone pretended
that he was the genuine article.

[T]he
same bothsidesism that turned Ryan into a fiscal hero played a crucial role in
the election of Donald Trump. How did the most corrupt presidential candidate
in American history eke out an Electoral College victory? . . . it wouldn’t
have been close if much of the news media hadn’t engaged in an orgy of false
equivalence.

[Commentators]
also seem shocked at the apparent indifference of Ryan and his colleagues to
Trump’s corruption and contempt for the rule of law. What happened to their
principles?

The
answer, of course, is that the principles they claimed to have never had
anything to do with their actual goals. In particular, Republicans haven’t
abandoned their concerns about budget deficits, because they never cared about
deficits; they only faked concern as an excuse to cut social programs.

[I]f
you look at Ryan’s actions, not the character he played to gullible audiences,
he has never shown himself willing to sacrifice anything he wants — not one
dime — on behalf of his professed principles. Why on earth would you expect him
to stick his neck out to defend the rule of law?

So
now Ryan is leaving. Good riddance. But hold the celebrations: If he was no
better than the rest of his party, he was also no worse. It’s possible that his
successor as speaker will show more backbone than he has — but only if that
successor is, well, a Democrat.

Translate This Page

Contact Me to Order Title Work

LGBT Legal Services

About Me

Out gay attorney in a committed relationship; formerly married and father of three wonderful children; sometime activist and political/news junkie; survived coming out in mid-life and hope to share my experiences and reflections with others.
In the career/professional realm, I am affiliated with Caplan & Associates PC where I practice in the areas of real estate, estate planning (Wills, Trusts, Advanced Medical Directives, Financial Powers of Attorney, Durable Medical Powers of Attorney); business law and commercial transactions; formation of corporations and limited liability companies and legal services to the gay, lesbian and transgender community, including birth certificate amendment.

Disclaimer on Opinions and Content

This Blog contains content that may be innapropriate for readers under the legal age of 18. IF YOU ARE UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, PLEASE LEAVE NOW. Thank you

This is an opinion and commentary blog and the opinions and contents of this Blog - including opinions expressed concerning opponents of LGBT equality - are the opinions only of the individual blogger and should not be attributed to any other individuals or to any organization of which the blogger is a past or current member.

Followers

Michael-in-Norfolk disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability, or availability of information or material displayed on this site and does not claim credit for any images or articles featured on this site, unless otherwise noted. All visual content is copyrighted to it's respectful owners. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies, and Michael-in-Norfolk does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. If you own rights to any of the images or articles, and do not wish them to appear on this site, please contact Michael-in-Norfolk via e-mail and they will be promptly removed. Michael-in-Norfolk contains links to other Internet sites. These links are provided solely as a convenience and are not endorsements of any products or services in such sites, and no information or content in such site has been endorsed or approved by this blog.