The only reason this was a race is because, among millennials, it wasn’t. Early Monday afternoon, Slate’s Jamelle Bouie wrote that Sanders had already won. After meeting with Sanders’s supporters in the Hawkeye State and contemplating the lengths his political revolution has already traveled, Bouiewrote:

Sanders is already a historic candidate—the first socialist in a century to build a genuine mass movement in American party politics. And whatever the Democratic Party is in the next 20 or 30 years, it will owe a great deal to Sanders and all the people—young or otherwise—who felt theBern.

Sanders decisively won with Iowa’s future Monday night. As far as the present is concerned, it’s difficult to say. It appears Clinton will edge Sanders by some nominal fraction of delegates. Considering the structural disadvantages Sanders faced — the concentration of his support among college students in a few select counties — it’s entirely possible the Vermont senator actually turned out more supporters than Clintondid.

But with Clinton’s prohibitive lead among superdelegates, to actually be on pace for the nomination, Sanders would have needed to win big Monday night. And the demographics of Iowa are much more favorable for Sanders than most upcoming states. To this point, Sanders has struggled to expand his base of support among nonwhite voters. So his failure to mount a decisive victory could reasonably be considered a win for Clinton, who still boasts a substantial lead in national polls.

Sanders will almost certainly win in New Hampshire next week. After that, the socialist’s prospects appear dicey. But in the long term, socialism’s chances of becoming a force in American politics are looking a lot better than they did when this political revolution waslaunched.