Pages

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

Updated: Corey Goode Responds to Claims Made by Bill Ryan

by Justin DeschampsBill Ryan wrote an article last week entitled, The Truth About Corey Goode, wherein he asserted that the Secret Space Program whistleblower was compromised and inauthentic. Days later, Stillness in the Storm produced an analysis of that article, concluding that what Ryan asserted and presented as evidence was not conclusive and the claims were unsupportable. Goode contacted me and offered to respond to the claims made by Ryan, in an effort to clear the air.

UpdateJune 21st, 2017: Bill Ryan has provided responses to Goode's responses, which I have added to the bottom of this article. In law, the accused always has the right to respond to their accuser's because it provides onlookers, usually a jury of peers, the ability to have at least two points of view on the facts at hand. This is important because if one doesn't respond, only the accuser's version of events are heard. We're living in a reality based on information and knowledge. To manipulate common knowledge—what a person thinks everyone else believes—is to control the masses; this is primarily what propaganda and social engineering is designed to do. This is how the powers that be so skillfully manipulate the unthinking masses, by appealing to their desire to fit in and feel accepted.A person's reputation or social image is very important in a world where most people can't tell image from substance. If people were highly discerning and thought critically, rumors and slander (unsupportable claims stated as fact) wouldn't be a problem. But in our world, such things can mean the difference between life and death. Most people won't even entertain an idea if they question the character
of the person sharing it—which in and of it self is a problem.Related As Corey Goode Secret Space Program Claims go Viral Critics Step up AttacksBy responding to these claims, Goode has an opportunity to clear the air, and restore his reputation and continue to do the work he came here to do.

Goode Responds to Ryan What follows are Ryan's claims presented to Goode as series of questions. Additionally, Goode has some closing commentary.

1. Ryan claims that, in 2014-2015 you sent him a series
of messages one evening, and the next morning denied that you sent
them. Ryan claims you were "split-minded" or under some
kind of mind influence. He further claims that the messages were on
each of your computers, which he apparently confirmed later. He
asserts that all of this is an indication you are untrustworthy. How
do you respond?Goode: I do not remember this incident with the details provided.
There was quite a lot of extreme drama on that Forum that lead [sic] up
to me closing my account. It would be easy to verify where emails
came from by tracing the Host Header of the Email's [sic] in
question. I would need more details about his claims to respond
fully.2. Ryan claims that you lied about when you came forward after
leaving Project Avalon, saying that it was being outed by Ryan and
Kerry Cassidy that ended your IT career. Ryan asserts that you were
not employed during the Christine interview that took place in
late 2014; therefore, you misrepresented yourself to the public
by saying you lost your career. How do you respond?Goode: I never claimed that I was fired due to Bill Ryan (BR) or
Kerry Cassidy (KC). I was already going through a workers comp injury that
involved 3 surgeries. I was fired illegally from that job after the
injury. It was not a career ending injury and I was receiving dozens
of job offers while going through surgeries.

I told Kerry Cassidy repeatedly that I
would only provide information anonymously. After it was clear I
would not do an interview she posted my name on her website and
several times in one of her YouTube videos. She then refused to
remove my name from both locations. I was in a panic for the safety
of my family and my career. Finally, I was forced to send all of the
Skype and Email conversations to YouTube/Google's complaint
department. She was receiving her third strike with YouTube (Which
would close her channel) and emailed me asking me to remove my
complaint agreeing to remove my name from her website and video. I
removed the complaint and we have kept this out of the public until
now. All of this is documented.I have all of the documentation to backup the fact
that I was outed on Project Camelot by Kerry's "executive
decision." Not only did this put my family in extreme danger,
but then made it almost impossible for me to be hired in the IT
field. Before these companies let you anywhere near their data or
infrastructure, they do background checks and social media searches.
If you claim to talk to non-terrestrials... They are not
letting you near their Billion Dollar Data!

3. Ryan claims that while you were participating in the Project
Avalon forums, you were counseling various MILAB whistleblowers,
apparently without permission from the moderators. Ryan feels this
was a grave breach of trust on your part and is evidence, in his
mind, that you have nefarious intentions. Were you asked not to do
this? How do you respond?

Goode: Not at all true. I never counseled a single MILAB. I
only listened to their information and referred them to a regression
therapist. I spoke to BR and his wife at the time, Christine, about
assisting the MILABs that began to reach out after my first
interview. BR and the moderators began to let people in this
confidential group willy nilly without any real vetting. I had no
hand in bringing MILABs to this group.My first interview was being used to draw in MILABs and the way
things were handled, it made the Forum feel like a “honey pot” to
draw in these people. This group became infiltrated very quickly and
the normal "Forum Drama" began to occur. Some of these
MILABs began to reach out to me personally with concerns about how
the Forum group was being handled. This all turned into one of many
disagreements between BR and myself.

4. Ryan claims that your wife, Stacy, made a false accusation that
Ryan was a member of the Church of Scientology. And that in the
subsequent scuttlebutt, Stacy revealed in her commentary that you,
Goode, where asked to produce a dossier on Ryan by "high
authorities," a senior member of the church. Ryan contends that
this is evidence you are working as an agent for an insidious group.
How do you respond?Goode: No one from any Scientology “like” organizations
contacted me. Ever! No one from that organization asked me to produce
a dossier on BR.[BR on Scientology]

The way the forum members responded to the situation was typical of internet forums and a lesson to anyone to stay away from them. They are highly
infiltrated by agents as well as a platform for narcissistic and
sociopathic individuals. All you have to do is read some of the posts and
feel the venomous energy behind them. The one recently posted on me
is an obvious example of that forums history.

5. Ryan claims that you were given access to an FBI database, and
told Ryan as much in a skype message. He asserts this is further
evidence you are an agent. How do you respond?Goode: So, if anyone that is investigating a topic or a person
in this field is given access to government documents that makes them
an agent? Wouldn't that make every researcher in this field an agent
by that standard?

If you look at my LinkedIn profile you will see that I received
FEMA certifications when in the Texas State Guard.

While in those
training sessions we rubbed shoulders with FEMA, FBI and other
federal and local law enforcement and disaster response agencies. I
was also a member of the FBI's "Infraguard" program. People
should join and see what that is for themselves. I actually believed
I was getting much more access than was available. It is a place to
report cyber crimes and monitor them in real time. This tool is used
for corporations to report or review reports of real-time hacking
attacks and how to mitigate them. I was not given access to any database other than the real-time
hacking and malware data coming from the Infraguard website. I was
provided pieces of files and a couple redacted files on certain
individuals that were coming together to attack me. There were a
number of people from this forum that were pointed out to me as being
extremely compromised. I have received files and data from contacts I
made.

I have had no access to the FBI Database... Ever. No matter
what other doctored or misquoted communications BR posts.6. Ryan claims that you started a blog after leaving the Project
Avalon forums and were attempting to smear him and others there. How
do you respond?Goode: After the attacks on my wife and I, I was triggered and
posted a lot of true and verified information about BR and his
business practices and people that he has had business relations
within South America (companies he has started etc...). I
believe these pages are still available on Google archives if anyone
wants to track them down. I did post that information during the
height of the "Forum Wars of 2015" on my blog
and them removed them a few months later after I
cooled off. There were a lot of threads that I posted that others
followed up on. I suggest people look into more of BR's past that is
available online for anyone to find.7. Ryan claims that your story changed when you began speaking to
David Wilcock, that it was "more polished" than the
testimony you gave to Christine in 2014, which they took to mean, you
concocted your story. How do you respond?Goode: How did it "change"? When Christine came to my house to do the first interview, I had just had the "entity
attachment" release that was causing me to have anxiety attacks
or verbally stammer while trying to talk about these experiences.
Interestingly enough, it was a disagreement over removing entity
attachments that triggered BR and caused our final disagreement.
Christine captured my first attempt to speak openly about all of
this. It can be found on my SBA YouTube Channel. My testimony has
evolved and been expounded upon in Cosmic Disclosure.

8. Ryan claims that an unnamed intelligence agent contacted him
saying that he has video footage of a conversation between you and
your wife Stacey, wherein you were formulating the plan to deceive
David Wilcock, captured via webcam activation. Ryan did not supply
this footage. How do you respond?Goode: Un-named intelligence agent = Shane Bales AKA
"The Ruiner" who was exposed as a pathological liar and
caught on many occasions making things up about myself
and David Wilcock. He is not an intel agent by any stretch of the
imagination. BR avoided using this “agents” name for a reason.
The screen
shot of a skype conversation, clearly edited, was from Shane. BR
himself (along w/his forum) came out against this person as being
untrustworthy. This usually happens with anyone that falls out of
BR's good graces, but he was correct on this occasion. If this guy is
a super hacker that infiltrated my network and turned on my laptop mic and video camera, then why trust any of the screen shots
or other information that he provided BR and the Forum in
question?This is one more unfounded accusation (disinformation) and BR
knows it. I have never had a conversation remotely like that with
Stacy. I say post the video! Show it! Put up or shut up... This is
Shane Bales we are talking about.Again I say, post that alleged video footage. It doesn't exist.
If this footage was lied about, how can anyone trust any of BR's
other accusations against me? Or others for that matter. Think about
it.[You can review Kerry Cassidy's opinion on this matter here, where she disagree's with some of Ryan's claims about whistle blowers.] 9. Ryan further claims that the same intelligence agent contact
sent a screenshot
of a skype conversation between the agent and yourself,
wherein you said "you are now on the payroll... so am
I.. it is what it is." Since the original release of Ryan's
article, some have come forward refuting the screenshot as a forgery,
saying your chat messages were altered. Did you actually send this
message and is what appears the image your words? If so, how do you
explain what these mean? How do you respond?Goode: I did speak w/Shane in skype until DW and I caught him
in a number of fabrications. The conversation in question was edited
somehow, but some of the terms were used. We were talking about how
we thought we [sic] were done with all of these programs. Being forced "back
on the payroll" is a way of saying that I was being forced back
into working with these groups again in an [sic] professional like
status. This was taken and made to look like I was being paid by the
powers that be. I have never been paid to be in the SSP "Programs,"
nor am I now. I have never received any payments from the powers that
be. This statement was taken out of context to purposely make me look
like an agent by either Shane or BR.It was reported to me that BR has also told people that he had
an investigator look into me and found that I was receiving payments
from “government sources”. BR cannot back up any of his
accusations with evidence that stands up.10. Ryan claims that the bulk of your testimony is a "carbon
copy" of other whistle blowers, and that your
claims are just too wild to believe, thus, in his mind, you
can't be authentic. How do you respond?Goode: Once my information violated BR's UFO religion, things
went south very quickly. This is easy to verify by looking at Forum
records (unless deleted or edited once more) his forum is controlled
like a small totalitarian country. You either tow the line or you [sic] are
either pushed out by other loyal forum members or are "un-subscribed"
from the forum. If you do not believe me, open up an account there
and speak your mind for a few weeks. You will wish you hadn't. This
is what occurred in 2015. He and others in that Forum have claimed I data mine and steal
other people's testimony. This was claimed about William Tompkins as
well. Even though my info came out prior. You really have to look
into these people and see their venomous attacks on a number of
people other than myself. If you do the research you will see a clear
pattern of behavior and accusations. This group seems to follow this
pattern in an unbroken cycle. That is one reason I have warned people
about hanging out in forums.11. Ryan claims that if you were an authentic whistle blower,
you would have never been allowed to continue talking. He seems to
imply that you have had no problems with various authorities in
sharing your testimony, that it has been 100% "approved" by
high-level players in the programs. Is this implication true? How do
you respond?Goode: By Bill's logic, William Tompkins, Clifford Stone, Pete
Peterson, etc, are all liars or agents since they are still alive after
coming forward. Does Bill believe that Steven Greer and his list of
whistleblowers who testified in 2001 are also liars or agents since
they are all alive? What about all of the people they interviewed on
Project Camelot? They would all be liars or agents according to this
logic. As William Tompkins has testified a faction of the US Navy is now wanting all of this disclosed. They gave him the green light to
report on the same programs I was involved in. He had direct approval
to release his information. Being that I was in these programs, I was
given more protection when it came to being a whistle-blower. I have
had an attempt to poison me at the airport, have had Chinooks flying over my house (I'm nowhere near an airbase) and have had multiple targeting lasers from sniper rifles appear on my chest while outside
with my children. Most recently I ended up in the emergency room from
an attack. Sadly, most of the most threatening attacks occurred when
some of these forum members began to find out where I lived. I had a
number of these forum members stalking me online. The line was drawn
for me when some of them began to show up around my home and began to
harass my family. We moved and took security precautions very quickly
after a few incidents around my house.BR himself had told me that I needed to come out in a big way to
ensure the safety of my family. He asserted that if I was public, if
the powers that be killed me it would just validate my testimony. This is also
what Gaia told me and what made me to agree to Cosmic
Disclosure.I have not recycled anyone's information.12. Ryan claims that you are a conscious deceiver, that you know your story is untrue and are promoting it anyway. How do you respond? Goode: He claims that I'm not really an IT professional as well. I invite people to check my references from my Linkedin Profile as well as verify my MCSE and A+ Certifications. I was in the IT Field for over 20 years and this is easily provable.[An article written by Corey Goode from 2003, protesting IT jobs moving to India, suggesting he did work as an IT professional: Outsourcing to India: Offshore Debate Rages.] As far as being a conscious deceiver. What is he basing this on? His opinion? The collective opinion of his forum? He certainly isn't basing this accusation off of the reverse speech analysis that showed no deception. Or the recent video of people studying my body language where they also concluded "Corey believes what he is saying"?

Closing Comments from
GoodeThese are just more unfounded accusations made by this group. Out of over 300,000 fans, there are less than 50 detractors on Avalon. To call this a noisy minority would be an understatement.Since this has occurred I have had many emails forwarded to me by individuals that had originated from Bill Ryan (BR), campaigning against me. Not only has he been on an email campaign to try to discredit me but has also worked behind the scenes with others to co-ordinate attacks. This is more like the behavior of an agent than anything I have done. BR told me that a close friend that was a private investigator was looking into me. What did he find? Nothing! BR needs to back up his claims with something other than his opinion, referencing mysterious evidence he cannot share or speculation. These types of accusations require proof! Not doctored “proof” from his forum.All I can say is do some research on this forum and all involved with its forum leader. Once you read their energy and see what drama has occurred in that forum you can "consider the source" and move on like everyone else does. All of the above accusations are either completely fabricated by BR or others from the forum or were once facts that have been twisted to a point of being unrecognizable. The forum post by BR "the Truth About Corey Goode" is a clear dis-info campaign. Remember, people tend to accuse you of what they would do in the exact situation. When they accuse you of something, pay close attention, you will learn much about your attacker.My policy has been not to respond to these individuals. It just gives a wider audience to their feeding frenzy energy. These attacks pop up on the RADAR and quickly disappear, usually backfiring on the attacker. I expect this one will be no different. This is a very small forum with a very dubious history and is highly infiltrated. These attacks have occurred in cycles and they change them up trying to find something that sticks.I have received quite a lot of information about how some of these people are coordinating in the background. Some of them even plan on attending Contact in the Desert to stir up problems between Dr. Greer and myself as well as do some ambush videos of them making scenes during presentations. How does this bring unity to the community? Divide and conquer is a Cabal tactic.I will end my final response to these attacks by saying, research these people. Take a close look at their language and energy, and the evidence used to support their claims, then consider the source. There is nothing to their accusations but speculation and deceitful assertions. We are trying to bring a bit of "Unity in the Community" so we can focus the energy of those who want to work together on disclosure. We are trying to organize people under the idea that none of us knows the entire truth. We can put aside the differences in our belief systems (reality bubbles) and work together for full disclosure. We will have to weed out those who only want division or have professional jealousy issues if we ever want disclosure.In my opinion these people are self-identifying and are minimizing their selves in this field even further than they have with previous actions.Corey Goode

Closing RemarksI reached out to Bill Ryan and asked if he would like
to respond, with the goal of settling the controversy so we can get
back to fixing the planet. He has yet to reply, but should he, I will produce an update. I want to raise one last point with respect to discernment, in order to determine if a claim is true, it must be judged on its merits and compared to reality. If this comparison can't take place, then we can't definitively discern what's going on, we can only guess and wait for more information. It's important that we avoid forming our beliefs only our our guesses.Sometimes verifying a claim is easy, like looking outside can confirm or deny a prediction about the weather. But in other cases, discernment is not so simple. When we can't access evidence ourselves, first hand, then we need to learn how to navigate uncertainty.For example, Ryan's claim that Goode deceived David Wilcock was based on another claim by someone who said they had footage of the event in question. In discerning this claim, first we need to properly understand what is being said and what is cited as evidence in support. In this case, the claim of Goode's deceptiveness with respect to Wilcock rests on another claim that footage of the event exists. The footage itself would need to be produced so that the all claims can be verified. But since we have no such evidence, then the claim cannot be verified and it remains unconfirmed.In other words, Ryan claims he was told footage exists showing Goode and his wife planning to deceive David Wilcock. Unless the video is produced, this claim is unverified and therefore cannot be considered as evidence. At this point, no definitive judgement or discernment can take place; the only thing that can be done is to speculate on what might have happened based on the evidence one does have. What tends to happen in this situation is people unconsciously assume that lack a of evidence is evidence of something else—this is a logical fallacy. Claims require evidence. When there is no evidence, a credibility assessment can give us a guess, but that's all it is.Assessing credibility allows us to gauge how likely people are to be telling the truth based on how truthful they have been in the past. And contrary to popular belief, while credibility can be a useful guide it still doesn't mean they can be believed without question. Credible people may say things that are not true. People lacking in credibility may say things that are true. As was just described, personal verification of actual evidence trumps credibility. Credibility is only a guess whereas personal verification examines the actual data, comparing it to reality, which gives the individual a detailed comprehension of what is happening. What this means is that we don't have to rely only on credibility when we've investigated something first hand. We don't need to trust the weather man when we can see the weather ourselves. In this case, we don't know if the footage exists or not. But based on the credibility of Ryan with respect to the evidence used to support his claims about Goode, or lack there of, it can be asserted that Goode has more credibility than Ryan. Goode is more objective while Ryan is nonobjective with respect to his stated beliefs. And therefore, Ryan's claim that Goode and his wife Stacey deceived Wilcock is likely untrue. But again, this is just a argument based on credibility and has little weight to it. Such an exercise of assessing credibility is valuable for its ability to guide our consciousness through an exploration, providing new insights along the way.

Learning to navigate uncertainty is very useful. Especially since it is likely that the vast majority of our beliefs and assumptions were never verified with evidence. They may not even be our own beliefs. If we aren't careful, we will fall into the trap of assuming our beliefs should not be questioned, which means we will not re-evaluate them, missing an opportunity to grow.This episode between Ryan and Goode presented us, the outsiders, with a good opportunity to test our discernment skills, and learn how to evaluate claims objectively. And it's helping to ferret out any potential disagreements as the need for unity increases with each passing day.Although discussions like this may be unpleasant, we need to be able to talk freely and openly, especially about the difficult things. For the truth must shine brightly in order to set the mind free.

Bill Ryan’s responses and comments in red.NOT
made public yet in any way (in this collated format).

Cited quotes by Corey or
others are in green.

~~~

1. Ryan claims that, in 2014-2015 you
sent him a series of messages one evening, and the next morning denied that you
sent them. Ryan claims you were "split-minded" or under some kind of
mind influence. He further claims that the messages were on each of your
computers, which he apparently confirmed later. He asserts that all of this is
an indication you are untrustworthy. How do you respond?

Goode: I do not remember this incident with the details
provided. There was quite a lot of extreme drama on that Forum that lead
[sic] up to me closing my account. It would be easy to verify where emails
came from by tracing the Host Header of the Email's [sic] in
question. I would need more details about his claims to respond fully.

We have all
that documented. It’s quite complex.

We had formed
aresearch group to talk with Van
Smith, a Georgia Guidestones specialist, after he and I had both received
identical, detailed e-mails from someone called Jesse Ames (his real name, we
discovered). Corey and three other non-Avalon-Moderators were invited to join
the group. Jesse Ames claimed knowledge about the Guidestones that was not in
the public domain.

After that, I
received further threatening e-mails, now anonymous, that ‘Jesse Ames is dead’,
and I should not publish the information.

In the middle
of all this, Van Smith saw a new comment or comments on his own blog that had
come from Corey, in the middle of the night. Corey was at that time strangely
critical of Van (who is a very good man), urging us not to trust him.

When
confronted, Corey stated he had no knowledge of having placed the comments
there. By coincidence, Van Smith and Paul Jackson (one of Avalon’s two senior
admins, the other being Ilie Pandia) knew each other from Silicon Valley days.
They are both genuine IT experts. They quickly established the comments really
had been sent by Corey.

Either Corey
was lying, or (more worryingly) truly had no memory of what he had done.

2. Ryan claims that you lied about when you came
forward after leaving Project Avalon, saying that it was being outed by Ryan
and Kerry Cassidy that ended your IT career. Ryan asserts that you were
not employed during the Christine interview that took place in late 2014;
therefore, you misrepresented yourself to the public by saying you lost your
career. How do you respond?

Goode: I never claimed that I was
fired due to Bill Ryan (BR) or Kerry Cassidy (KC). I was already going through
a workers comp injury that involved 3 surgeries. I was fired illegally from
that job after the injury. It was not a career ending injury and I was
receiving dozens of job offers while going through surgeries.

I told Kerry Cassidy repeatedly that I would only provide information
anonymously. After it was clear I would not do an interview she posted my name
on her website and several times in one of her YouTube videos. She then refused
to remove my name from both locations. I was in a panic for the safety of my
family and my career. Finally, I was forced to send all of the Skype and Email
conversations to YouTube/Google's complaint department. She was receiving her
third strike with YouTube (Which would close her channel) and emailed me asking
me to remove my complaint agreeing to remove my name from her website and
video. I removed the complaint and we have kept this out of the public until
now. All of this is documented.

I have all of the documentation to backup the fact that I was outed
on Project Camelot by Kerry's "executive decision." Not only did this
put my family in extreme danger, but then made it almost impossible for me to
be hired in the IT field. Before these companies let you anywhere near their
data or infrastructure, they do background checks and social media searches. If
you claim to talk to non-terrestrials... They are not letting you near
their Billion Dollar Data!

The ‘six-figure
income’ claim is here: (as well as, I believe, in several other places)

To
say that I have gained anything financially or otherwise is a joke.

I have only lost things
since my first interview was released by this person on another forum.

I have a wife and two
children that they made sure out of spite I couldn't support via my business
where I made (Past Tense) in the "High6Figure$PerYear"

(Corey’s original underlined emphasis.)

My own comment:
Corey was on disability and was not working, before his 2014 Avalon interview
was published… which he wanted me to do. There was no push from anyone
else.

Corey sent me a
Skype conversation between him and Christine Anderson (23 Oct 2014) in which
Corey’s enthusiasm for the release of the interview as soon as possible is very
clear. He also expressed that to me, also documented. (He hasn’t mentioned this here, specifically, but earlier has several
times stated that he was under pressure to release the interview. Not so.)

Corey’s full
name is linked to his internet GoodETxSG moniker in several places, that he
seemed to be unaware of, or did not know how to edit. Here are two:

I have a copy,
sent to me by Corey himself, of a message received by him from an Avalon member
who wanted to alert him that he had found his real identity on the internet
‘within 5 minutes’.

The friendly
member (whose name we know) wrote:

Hi
Corey,
Thank you for being so brave as to come forward with the information that you
have so far.

It must have taken a lot out of you to go back through some of those hidden
memories.

The reason I am contacting you is that I was a little concerned about how easy
it is to find information on you, hence me addressing you as Corey, or is it
James C Goode!

This information I found within 5 minutes of searching the net (just on my
iPhone) with just the phrase "Goodetxsg" (Goode Texas State Guard), I
found a complete work history, many photos of you, and found lookup sites that
if I paid money for (I'm not going to do that!)would give your current address
& telephone number in Texas.

I do not wish to frighten you, but maybe a change of forum name at least may
help to give you more anonymity, and sever some of those connections.

Maybe others won't be as curious as I am on the net? But I do try to look out
for people here if I can.

Anyway, if I can help in anyway with anything just let me know.

Love and Truth,

[Avalon username]

Corey forwarded
this to me, adding:

I
thought I had removed all references to TXSG, Corey or James Corey Goode in my
threads. There is just a lot of posting history form myself and others refering
to TXSG and Corey to redact...
But this user took the time to data mine and find the info. Was disturbing to
get this email this morning... I think they were just showing me how weak the
anonimity was, but it was creepy enough.

3. Ryan
claims that while you were participating in the Project Avalon forums, you were
counseling various MILAB whistleblowers, apparently without permission from the
moderators. Ryan feels this was a grave breach of trust on your part and is
evidence, in his mind, that you have nefarious intentions. Were you asked not
to do this? How do you respond?

Goode: Not at all true. I never
counseled a single MILAB. I only listened to their information and referred
them to a regression therapist. I spoke to BR and his wife at the time, Christine,
about assisting the MILABs that began to reach out after my first interview. BR
and the moderators began to let people in this confidential group willy nilly
without any real vetting. I had no hand in bringing MILABs to this group.

My first interview
was being used to draw in MILABs and the way things were handled, it made the
Forum feel like a “honey pot” to draw in these people. This group became
infiltrated very quickly and the normal "Forum Drama" began to occur.
Some of these MILABs began to reach out to me personally with concerns about
how the Forum group was being handled. This all turned into one of many
disagreements between BR and myself.

For those who I am giving council too I will continue to do so in
Unseen.is Email, Chat and Voice over IP w/those w/Unseen.is accounts at EncrytpSec@Unseen.is
Thank you,
GoodETxSG

4. Ryan
claims that your wife, Stacy, made a false accusation that Ryan was a member of
the Church of Scientology. And that in the subsequent scuttlebutt, Stacy
revealed in her commentary that you, Goode, where asked to produce a
dossier on Ryan by "high authorities," a senior member of the church.
Ryan contends that this is evidence you are working as an agent for an
insidious group. How do you respond?

Goode: No one from any Scientology
“like” organizations contacted me. Ever! No one from that organization asked me
to produce a dossier on BR.

The way the forum members responded to the
situation was typical of internet forums and a lesson to anyone to stay away
from them. They are highly infiltrated by agents as well as a platform for
narcissistic and sociopathic individuals. All you have to do is read some of
the posts and feel the venomous energy behind them. The one recently posted on
me is an obvious example of that forums history.

Corey’s wife Stacy, then Avalon forum
member SilverPhoenix, had wrongly stated I was ‘a member of the Church of
Scientology’. I never have been: she found the wrong ‘Bill Ryan’ on the
internet, an older man, and an American. I corrected her, and she became
extremely angry, claiming censorship.

This is the erroneous ‘Bill Ryan in the
Church of Scientology’ reference: (Scroll down to find ‘BILL RYAN’, but that’s
not me.)

My own timeline round about that period
is that after graduating in 1974 I worked for six months as a nursing auxiliary
in a hospital in Bristol, England (because I was thinking of studying medicine)
and then spent the summer of 1975 at home with my parents in Kent, England.

This was not my husband and I in a conspiracy using google to try
to dig up dirt on bill. It was the correct bill ryan.

The links I posted were some that I remembered being displayed and the others I
found after my husband closed the citrix shared session page the documents and
links were displayed on from his conference call. This person is sending the
documents of both the people talked about to my husband in the mail. This person is both a high
ranking Scientology Member with access to their maticulous records and also a
person that works at the DHS that my husband worked with and has known and used
to get background information on people for years. They displayed
records on a citrix conference page and went over some of the church terms and
abbreviations.

Corey went on to state himself that the
‘dossier’ on myself extended to over 70 pages. (It was never revealed who the
other person was.)

5. Ryan
claims that you were given access to an FBI database, and told Ryan as much in
a skype message. He asserts this is further evidence you are an agent. How do
you respond?

Goode: So, if anyone that is
investigating a topic or a person in this field is given access to government
documents that makes them an agent? Wouldn't that make every researcher in this
field an agent by that standard?

If you look at my LinkedIn profile
you will see that I received FEMA certifications when in the Texas State Guard.

While in those training sessions we rubbed shoulders with FEMA, FBI and other
federal and local law enforcement and disaster response agencies. I was also a
member of the FBI's "Infraguard"
program. People should join and see what that is for themselves. I actually
believed I was getting much more access than was available. It is a place to
report cyber crimes and monitor them in real time. This tool is used for
corporations to report or review reports of real-time hacking attacks and how
to mitigate them.

I was not given access to any database other than the real-time hacking and
malware data coming from the Infraguard
website. I was provided pieces of files and a couple redacted files on certain
individuals that were coming together to attack me. There were a number of people
from this forum that were pointed out to me as being extremely compromised. I
have received files and data from contacts I made.

I have had no access to the FBI Database... Ever.
No matter what other doctored or misquoted communications BR posts.

Note: I never at any stage said Corey was
an ‘agent’. Just that he had agency connections or affiliations. That’s
just as important, simply not the same thing.

10:53 COREYI clicked and was IN the freaking FBI database a few
minutes ago... I logged
out right away... there was a questionair on purpose, all kinds of criteria...

10:54 COREYYipes... so i hve to b
careful at first... wise.

6.
Ryan claims that you started a blog after leaving the Project Avalon forums and
were attempting to smear him and others there. How do you respond?

Goode: After the attacks on my wife
and I, I was triggered and posted a lot of true and verified information about
BR and his business practices and people that he has had business relations
within South America (companies he has started etc...). I believe
these pages are still available on Google archives if anyone wants to track
them down. I did post that information during the height of the "Forum
Wars of 2015" on my blog and them removed them a few
months later after I cooled off. There were a lot of threads that I posted
that others followed up on. I suggest people look into more of BR's past that
is available online for anyone to find.

No attacks. The ‘attacks’ actually came
from Stacy (his wife). Everything she wrote is publicly visible here:

(Note: This is barely relevant, but I've
certainly never ever started a company, or had any ‘business relations’, in
South America.)

7. Ryan
claims that your story changed when you began speaking to David Wilcock, that
it was "more polished" than the testimony you gave to Christine in
2014, which they took to mean, you concocted your story. How do you respond?

Goode: How did it
"change"? When Christine
came to my house to do the first interview, I had just had the "entity
attachment" release that was causing me to have anxiety attacks or
verbally stammer while trying to talk about these experiences. Interestingly
enough, it was a disagreement over removing entity attachments that triggered
BR and caused our final disagreement. Christine captured my first attempt to
speak openly about all of this. It can be found on my SBA
YouTube Channel. My testimony has evolved and been expounded upon in Cosmic Disclosure.

The original, unedited, raw audio,
recorded by Christine Anderson with Corey’s full permission on two separate
days a week apart, is here.

I come from a long line of MilitaryIntelfamily, I have been
told by Mil and Civ people that I am a MILAB, but I do not quite buy it... no
memories of that stuff... wife says I act out battle scenarios and shout out
orders in my sleep but I was an Intel/Communications guy... so I chalk that up
to watching to many movies and listening to tooo many war stories.

8. Ryan claims that an unnamed
intelligence agent contacted him saying that he has video footage of a
conversation between you and your wife Stacey, wherein you were formulating the
plan to deceive David Wilcock, captured via webcam activation. Ryan did not
supply this footage. How do you respond?

Goode: Un-named intelligence
agent = Shane Bales AKA "The Ruiner" who was exposed as a
pathological liar and caught on many occasions making things up about myself
and David Wilcock. He is not an intel agent by any stretch of the imagination.
BR avoided using this “agents” name for a reason. The screen
shot of a skype conversation, clearly edited, was from Shane. BR himself
(along w/his forum) came out against this person as being untrustworthy. This
usually happens with anyone that falls out of BR's good graces, but he was
correct on this occasion. If this guy is a super hacker that infiltrated my
network and turned on my laptop mic and video camera, then why trust any of the
screen shots or other information that he provided BR and the Forum in
question?

This is one more unfounded accusation (disinformation) and BR knows it. I have
never had a conversation remotely like that with Stacy. I say post the video!
Show it! Put up or shut up... This is Shane Bales we are talking about.

Again I say, post that alleged video footage. It doesn't exist. If this footage
was lied about, how can anyone trust any of BR's other accusations against me?
Or others for that matter. Think about it.

[You can review Kerry Cassidy's opinion on this matter
here, where she disagree's with some of Ryan's claims about whistle
blowers.]

That’s correct: it was Shane Bales. In my
interview with Daniel Liszt (the ‘Dark Journalist’), I was careful to state
clearly that this could not be substantiated.

9.
Ryan further claims that the same intelligence agent contact sent a screenshot
of a skype conversation between the agent and yourself, wherein
you said "you are now on the payroll... so am I.. it is what it
is." Since the original release of Ryan's article, some have come forward
refuting the screenshot as a forgery, saying your chat messages were altered.
Did you actually send this message and is what appears the image your words? If
so, how do you explain what these mean? How do you respond?

Goode: I did speak w/Shane in skype
until DW and I caught him in a number of fabrications. The conversation in
question was edited somehow, but some of the terms were used. We were talking
about how we thought we [sic] were done with all of these programs. Being
forced "back on the payroll" is a way of saying that I was being
forced back into working with these groups again in an [sic]
professional like status. This was taken and made to look like I was being
paid by the powers that be. I have never been paid to be in the SSP
"Programs," nor am I now. I have never received any payments from the
powers that be. This statement was taken out of context to purposely make me
look like an agent by either Shane or BR.

It was reported to me that BR has also told people that he had an investigator
look into me and found that I was receiving payments from “government sources”.
BR cannot back up any of his accusations with evidence that stands up.

It wasn’t edited in any way. That full Skype chat was sent by Corey
himself to several Avalon members. A number of people have it and are willing
to confirm it was unedited by anyone after Corey shared it.

10. Ryan claims that the bulk of your testimony is a "carbon
copy" of other whistle blowers, and that your claims
are just too wild to believe, thus, in his mind, you can't be
authentic. How do you respond?

Goode: Once my information violated
BR's UFO religion, things went south very quickly. This is easy to verify by
looking at Forum records (unless deleted or edited once more) his forum is
controlled like a small totalitarian country. You either tow the line or you
[sic] are either pushed out by other loyal forum members or are
"un-subscribed" from the forum. If you do not believe me, open up an
account there and speak your mind for a few weeks. You will wish you hadn't.
This is what occurred in 2015.

He and others in that Forum
have claimed I data mine and steal other people's testimony. This was claimed
about William Tompkins as well. Even though my info came out prior. You really
have to look into these people and see their venomous attacks on a number of
people other than myself. If you do the research you will see a clear pattern
of behavior and accusations. This group seems to follow this pattern in an
unbroken cycle. That is one reason I have warned people about hanging out in
forums.I have not recycled
anyone's information.

The ’20-and-back’ notion,
central to Corey’s claims (or else nothing at all would fit in his personal life
timeline in any way) is completely recycled from Michael Relfe’s story,
published by his wife Stephanie in 2000. See http://TheMarsRecords.com.

I recently received this
quite unexpected e-mail from Stephanie, who wrote the two books, both free for
anyone to download at that site.

Dear Bill,
Thank you for your words of support re The Mars Records and enlightening people
about Goode.
We have posted your interview at TheMarsRecords.com.
Best regards
Stephanie Relfe

Michael Relfe’s claims are de facto unverifiable, but the two books
meticulously detail regression sessions done by Stephanie, a qualified
therapist, and chronicle his gradual understanding (rather to his own disbelief
and astonishment at the time) of what he now thinks happened to him.

It’s worthy of note that Corey has NOT
done any regressions, believes them (incorrectly) to be ‘intrusive’ (his word),
and has also declined to undertake any polygraph test.

11. Ryan claims that if you were an
authentic whistle blower, you would have never been allowed to continue
talking. He seems to imply that you have had no problems with various
authorities in sharing your testimony, that it has been 100% "approved"
by high-level players in the programs. Is this implication true? How do you
respond?

Goode: By Bill's logic, William Tompkins, Clifford
Stone, Pete Peterson, etc, are all liars or agents since they are still alive
after coming forward. Does Bill believe that Steven Greer and his list of
whistleblowers who testified in 2001 are also liars or agents since they are
all alive? What about all of the people they interviewed on Project Camelot?
They would all be liars or agents according to this logic.

Sadly, most of the most
threatening attacks occurred when some of these forum members began to find out
where I lived. I had a number of these forum members stalking me online. The
line was drawn for me when some
of them began to show up around my home and began to harass my family. We
moved and took security precautions very quickly after a few incidents around
my house.

BR himself had told me that I
needed to come out in a big way to ensure the safety of my family. He asserted
that if I was public, if the powers that be killed me it would just
validate my testimony. This is also what Gaia told me and what made me to
agree to Cosmic Disclosure.

There’s a LOT to suggest
that Peterson, Greer, Tompkins, are all now compromised. (And also Andrew
Basiago, a decent man who really does believe everything he’s ever stated.)
It’s beyond the scope of a note of this nature to document all that here.

Richard Dolan stated in
his answer to a question at the end of a recent Australian presentation that he
was offered the opportunity to publish Tompkins’ book. He said:

“I could not EVER, in good conscience,
publish that book. I just find way too much that’s questionable about it, and I
would not EVER want to associate my name with it.”

Of course, there are some
genuine whistleblowers who have not suffered because of their courage. But many
HAVE suffered, a lot — or died. And none had ever had their own year-long TV
show.

Re Avalon members
harassing his family, I don’t believe that for a moment. I believe that to
be a lie. If it’s not, Corey should name names — because he’d have to know
names in order to identify them as Avalon members. (And even then, how would he
know what they looked like, or what their real names were?)

This sounds like a police
matter, and so he should report that. If he’s unable to substantiate his claim,
then it’s defamation of an organization, which becomes a legal issue.

12. Ryan
claims that you are a conscious deceiver, that you know your story is untrue
and are promoting it anyway. How do you respond?

Goode: He claims that I'm not really
an IT professional as well. I invite people to check
my references from my Linkedin Profile as well as verify my MCSE and A+
Certifications. I was in the IT Field for over 20 years and this is easily
provable.

As far as being a conscious deceiver. What is he basing this on? His opinion?
The collective opinion of his forum? He certainly isn't basing this accusation
off of the reverse
speech analysis that showed no deception. Or the recent video of people studying my
body language where they also concluded "Corey believes what he is
saying"?

Corey’s IT experience was almost
certainly very low level: not an ‘expert’ in any way. There’s a detailed
response here, by Avalon Administrator Paul Jackson (who really is an ex-Silicon
Valley IT expert):

Out of over 300,000 fans, there are less than 50 detractors on Avalon. To call
this a noisy minority would be an understatement.

There are many well-known names in our
research field who have said publicly or privately that they will not be
associated with this story. The latest are Linda Howe and Jim Nichols, both on
record. Off-record, there are many other well-known names. Radio hosts who are
severely critical on record include Randy Maugans, Jesse Randolph, and
Alexandra Bruce. I’m confident there are many more I’m unaware of.

Blogs and YouTube commenters are full of
people ridiculing Corey’s Story. They’re easy to find.

Since this has occurred I have had many emails forwarded to me by individuals
that had originated from Bill Ryan (BR), campaigning against me. Not only has
he been on an email campaign to try to discredit me but has also worked behind
the scenes with others to co-ordinate attacks. This is more like the behavior
of an agent than anything I have done.

BR told me that a close friend that was a private investigator was looking into
me.

No ‘e-mail campaigns’, or ‘coordinated
attacks’. I've been quiet about this for two years, and my interview with
Daniel Liszt was requested by him, not me.

What did he find? Nothing! BR needs to back up his
claims with something other than his opinion, referencing mysterious evidence
he cannot share or speculation. These types of accusations require proof! Not
doctored “proof” from his forum.

All I can say is do some research on this forum and all involved with its forum
leader. Once you read their energy and see what drama has occurred in that
forum you can "consider the source" and move on like everyone else
does.

All of the above accusations are either completely fabricated by BR or others
from the forum or were once facts that have been twisted to a point of being
unrecognizable. The forum post by BR "the Truth About Corey Goode" is
a clear dis-info campaign.

No ‘disinfo’. Everything stated there is
documented.

Remember, people tend to accuse you of what they
would do in the exact situation. When they accuse you of something, pay close
attention, you will learn much about your attacker.

My policy has been not to respond to these individuals. It just gives a wider
audience to their feeding frenzy energy. These attacks pop up on the RADAR and
quickly disappear, usually backfiring on the attacker. I expect this one will
be no different. This is a very small forum with a very dubious history and is
highly infiltrated. These attacks have occurred in cycles and they change them
up trying to find something that sticks.

I have received quite a lot of information about how some of these people are
coordinating in the background. Some of them even plan on attending Contact in the Desert to stir up
problems between Dr. Greer and myself as well as do some ambush videos of them
making scenes during presentations.

If anything like that was planned by
anyone, or even happened, I know nothing about it. I don’t believe this to be
true.

How does this bring unity to the community? Divide
and conquer is a Cabal tactic.

I will end my final response to these attacks by saying, research these people. Take a close look at their language and energy, and the evidence used to support their
claims, then consider the source. There is nothing to their accusations but
speculation and deceitful assertions.
We are trying to bring a bit of "Unity in the Community" so we can
focus the energy of those who want to work together on disclosure. We are
trying to organize people under the idea that none of us knows the entire
truth. We can put aside the differences in our belief systems (reality bubbles)
and work together for full disclosure. We will have to weed out those who only
want division or have professional jealousy issues if we ever want disclosure.

In my opinion these people are self-identifying and are minimizing their selves
in this field even further than they have with previous actions.

Corey Goode

~~~

My final comment:

This shows very clearly that Corey is either a frequent conscious
liar, or has pathologically severe memory problems.

(Or course, memory problems can induce
confabulation, a form of lying to oneself. But that would be for a specialist
to diagnose.)

Justin Deschamps is a truth seeker inspired by philosophy and the love of wisdom in all its forms. He was formally trained in physics and psychology, later discovering the spiritual basis of reality and the interconnected nature of all things. He strives to find the path of truth while also walking it himself, sharing what he knows with others so as to facilitate cooperative change for a better future. He is a student of all and a teacher to some. Follow on Twitter @sitsshow, Facebook Stillness in the Storm, and steemit @justin-sits.

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?

Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it.

View and Share our Images. Curious about Stillness in the Storm? See our About this blog - Contact Us page.If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog.We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts

to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining

knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth;

not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.This website is supported by readers like you.

No comments
:

Post a Comment

SITS blog is a venue where Data we come across can be shared with all of you. If we look past personal bias, and distill the Absolute Data within each post, our natural intuition will assemble these nuggets together and reveal a greater truth.

We do not know what that truth is yet of course. We are discovering that together as a whole by sharing and discussing our unique perspective. Share your thoughts and we will all come to a greater understanding as one.

The Galactic Mantra

Fair Use of Information for ALL

All data is freely available to the ALL, as an inherent inalienable right of consciousness and existence, for the use of any being in creation who seek to know and use it in sacred trust with the Creator. No Claim of Ownership is made by SITS, for any data presented on this page or elsewhere.

Any information, writing, photographs, videos or content on this page is freely available to ALL without claim of Intellectual Ownership. We advise providing attribution to this website (Stillness in the Storm) when, and if, data herein presented is used elsewhere; so as to remain honest, transparent and to maintain the public trust as to where the information was found.

Any and All data herein presented has been re-claimed for the collective benefit of all sentient life from any and all parties who seek to limit its dissemination for personal gain only. Any claims of intellectual ownership or copyright, that were once ascribed to content on this page, held in inperfect trust and dishonor, or elsewhere, is NULL and VOID; as a result of a misrepresentation of right of ownership and breach of trust by any party whom presumes to claim title and exclusive right of use without also making available such information to those honorable parties who lawfully petition to use it.

No requests, threats, or notices that seek to limit the sharing information for the benefit of ALL will be honored. However, a humble request to provide information in a certain way or form will be considered, up to and including, the partial removal of data, and only as an agreement between two or more honorable parties whom fully disclose and honor a moral duty to the truth.

FAIR USE NOTICE:

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and so on. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

In this respect we are in accordance with the statutes as well as Natural Law. ﻿

All Rights Reserved in Sacred Trust under the One True Divine Creator.

SITS is a humble agent of the One Infinite, Divine, and Absolute Creator, in service of the Truth and the ALL beings.

All data is freely available to the ALL. No Claim of Ownership is made hereon. Powered by Blogger.