Active Now

Two sexually deviant harassers are on SCOTUS. Thomas and Kavanaugh. Betcha the gaslighter-in-chief who is one too will get a 3rd! Don'tchu?

The minute Ruth Bader Ginsberg retires/leaves the gaslighter-in-chief will go for SCOTUS HAT TRICK. A 3rd male scumbag who sexually harasses the ladies. I'm shure there are plenty more out there from which to choose. The gaslighter-in-chief so far has shown us his unerring sense of who is the worst of the worst and appoints him/her.

What about his grandkids? Oh. Right. Everything all the time is always about him. SIGH. Thank you for your reply Sharon. I read that by the end of the century the ocean waters will be a different color. There is a huge iceberg melting very rapidly either in the Arctic or Antarctic and by the time it has completed melted it will raise the ocean level by TWO INCHES. Wrap your brain around THAT! Meanwhile the animals who fed off the lands and ice floes are dying because the food supplies are dwindling. All of this is happening constantly 24/7 worldwide. Inexorably. Endlessly. Continuously. And still the blinders wearers either ignore it completely or refute it completely. As they are drowning. Stubborn little beasties aren t they? :)
This post was edited by RosieG at February 10, 2019 5:40 AM MST

This answer is kind of lengthy but I'll post it just in case someone doesn't want to bother doing any research. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley referred a woman who accused Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of rape to the Justice Department for making false statements and obstruction of justice. Kavanaugh, confirmed to the high court on Oct. 6, was infamously accused by multiple women of sexual assault and misconduct before the confirmation.

Judy Munro-Leighton, according to Grassley’s office, “alleged that Justice Kavanaugh and a friend had raped her ‘several times each’ in the backseat of a car.”

Those accusations were made via a "Jane Doe" letter provided to Sen. Kamala Harris, a California Democrat and committee member, Grassley’s office wrote. Upon further investigation, however, inconsistencies in the story emerged.

Committee investigators quickly determined Ms. Munro-Leighton is a committed left-wing activist, is decades older than Judge Kavanaugh, and has always lived several hundred miles away from him. Bottom line here is that Ms. Munro-Leighton "lied". Something that has been well-established but the liberals continue to try to pass off as something that really happened.

Let's not forget about the liar Anita Hill. 1. A witness said she was told details about the supposed sexual harassment while the two were living in Washington, except this witness was not living in Washington when Hill worked for Thomas. The witness supposedly corroborating Hills’ allegations had moved out of Washington before Hill even began working for Thomas. How could she have possibly been told about the harassment before it happened?

2. Hill followed Thomas, a man she accused of sexual harassment, from job to job. Hill claimed that she feared to lose her government job if she did not follow Thomas from job to job. As Brookings Institute senior fellow Stuart Taylor Jr. points out, Hill was an employee of the federal government, known for its incredible job security.

3. Hill made numerous phone calls to her supposed sexual harasser after she stopped working for him. Phone logs document numerous calls from Hill to Thomas after she stopped working for him. It seems rather odd that a woman would consistently call a man who sexually harassed her. Also, Hill initially denied that she made these calls — which doesn’t exactly boost her credibility either.

4. Hill initially asked to be kept anonymous when her accusations were presented to Thomas. But if her accusations were true, then Thomas would know that the accusations were launched by Hill, so why ask for anonymity? Think about it: The accusations referred to things that were supposed to have happened when only two people were present. Anita Hill’s request for anonymity made sense only if the charges were false.

5. Hill lied five times about being told something from a Democratic staffer, which she later admitted to under oath. Hill admitted, under oath, that although she previously denied being told something by a Democratic staffer, she actually was. This, of course, reeks of a political motive for the allegations and, again, a lack of credibility of the accuser.

6. A dozen females who worked with Thomas and Hill gave favorable testimony about Thomas and refuted the claims by Hill of Thomas’ inappropriate behavior. A "dozen” women came out in support of Thomas, giving glowing testimony of his behavior, lending contradiction to Hills’ accusations. :)