Israel seizes pro-Palestinian activist ship off Gaza

I have posted before on the subject of a nation attacking another state,and the rest of the world just sits and waits to see the outcome.The reason is
simple no gains in resources and money /political.Brings these into it and it would be a different story.Palestine is bullied and hit by the Isreali
forces...(and the west of the world including UK just lets it happen)

EDIT: oh and I didnt mention those three because in 10 or 11 years I never tried to beat the bloody hell out of anyone with a vest, with a gas
mask or even with my goggles. Maybe it works tho... you try it and tell me afterwards how aggressive and dangerous those items are will ya
mate?

I'm not sure what your ten or eleven years have to do with anything. I'm not even sure what that's a reference too. Regardless, bulletproof vests, gas
masks, and night vision goggles do provide a tactical advantage in combat. To ignore that is as naive as ignoring the military applications of
concrete and rebar.

I appreciate your views, but I'm finding your lack of respect for my points on the topic, and your lack of maturity in general, to be highly
frustrating. I'm trying very hard not to feed into it. I have not slighted your views or responded to them with sarcasm, as you have mine. If it
appears that I have and you're retaliating, I am sorry. That was not my intent. I would enjoy the same benefit. Would you be so kind as to show me
that? Thank you.

Not to put words into Pervius' keyboard, but I would think "Mr. X" is just a label for whatever person, corporation, or entity is performing
these actions.

For example, if "Mr. X" were Maersk. Let's say Maersk loses US$300M in a piracy attack. Maersk then creates a "Gaza Aid" ship to "attempt" to run the
blockade, knowing full well it will not make it. Israel seizes the cargo, which Maersk values at US$300M. Israel pays Maersk back, balancing out the
true loss from the piracy attack.

I think that is what Pervius is trying to say. I could be wrong.

I don't believe that is how it works though, since I would assume all shipments are insured in one way or another. As long as it were insured, the
loss would be paid back through the insurance company. I'm not too knowledgeable on maritime law though, so I really have no idea who would be
responsible for repayment.

Yeah, okay. Now I get what he meant.
But I think it is unlikely that someone would be able to scam a nation or an insurance company with that method. It's simply to obvious, and I don't
imagine any company would insure such a cargo or vessel in the first place, and I doubt that Israel would ever pay damage to said vessel, by printing
extra money or however it was proposed, not even if pressured by the international community.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.