Evidence for a bizarre state of matter - known as a superfluid - has been found in Cassiopeia A.

Cassiopeia A (Cas A for short) is a supernova remnant located about 11,000 light years away from Earth.

Chandra observations taken over a decade show significant cooling in the dense core left behind after the explosion.

This composite image shows a beautiful X-ray and optical view of Cassiopeia A (Cas A), a supernova remnant located in our Galaxy about 11,000 light years away. These are the remains of a massive star that exploded about 330 years ago, as measured in Earth's time frame. X-rays from Chandra are shown in red, green and blue along with optical data from Hubble in gold.

At the center of the image is a neutron star, an ultra-dense star created by the supernova. Ten years of observations with Chandra have revealed a 4% decline in the temperature of this neutron star, an unexpectedly rapid cooling. Two new papers by independent research teams show that this cooling is likely caused by a neutron superfluid forming in its central regions, the first direct evidence for this bizarre state of matter in the core of a neutron star.

The inset shows an artist's impression of the neutron star at the center of Cas A. The different colored layers in the cutout region show the crust (orange), the core (red), where densities are much higher, and the part of the core where the neutrons are thought to be in a superfluid state (inner red ball). The blue rays emanating from the center of the star represent the copious numbers of neutrinos -- nearly massless, weakly interacting particles -- that are created as the core temperature falls below a critical level and a neutron superfluid is formed, a process that began about 100 years ago as observed from Earth. These neutrinos escape from the star, taking energy with them and causing the star to cool much more rapidly.

This new research has allowed the teams to place the first observational constraints on a range of properties of superfluid material in neutron stars. The critical temperature was constrained to between one half a billion to just under a billion degrees Celsius. A wide region of the neutron star is expected to be forming a neutron superfluid as observed now, and to fully explain the rapid cooling, the protons in the neutron star must have formed a superfluid even earlier after the explosion. Because they are charged particles, the protons also form a superconductor.

Using a model that has been constrained by the Chandra observations, the future behavior of the neutron star has been predicted. The rapid cooling is expected to continue for a few decades and then it should slow down.

Amazing issues here. I am very glad to see your post.
Thank you so much and I am having a look ahead to touch you.

Posted by Marcus on Saturday, 02.22.14 @ 10:26am

When and will this neutron star ever affect the earth and mankind? How long will it take for it to reach us?

Posted by jett on Wednesday, 12.5.12 @ 09:24am

I like the website that you had create because you can learn any thing from it about the space.

Posted by Maryam Ayyub on Tuesday, 05.29.12 @ 23:08pm

I am in a group of enthusiasts and professional physicists and we are wondering if the superfluid state in the core and on the surface are discrete states or is there any communication between the two?

Posted by Mike Baskett on Tuesday, 03.20.12 @ 17:40pm

I am doing a science project on this star and I wanted to know if anyone knows the estimated life left in this stage of the star?

Posted by Brittany on Wednesday, 02.22.12 @ 22:01pm

Perhaps the perpendicular blue lines represent electrons chased from the helium atom balloon around the central reactor system. That would be the ponderomotive force that is mentioned in Nature 29 Oct. 2009. Because of the star's gravity, the protons of helium atoms cannot follow.
That part about electrons not neutrinos is a supposition, but giant opposed galaxy face bulges are definitely caused by the Ponderomotive force.

Posted by Ed McCarvill on Monday, 02.6.12 @ 12:52pm

It is really exciting to have such a discovery in this age. We could learn more and do more in the future.

Posted by Taylor Locksmith on Sunday, 07.24.11 @ 22:55pm

If neutrinos are emitted then a nuclear reaction has to take place Two neutrons sticking together to a pair of neutrons is no nuclear reaction so where the neutrinos come from

If the formed neutron pair is superfluid and does not interact anymore with the rest of the star then it cannot exchange thermal energy with the remaining neutrons For the thermal balance the emission of the neutrinos is then insignificant because the other neutrons cannot see that the pair has lost energy by neutrino emission So where does the cooling come from ultimately

Posted by Roland Hildebrand on Friday, 03.11.11 @ 12:30pm

Dear Stup id,
Thanks for your questions. There isn't anything special that will happen to stars when they cross the same plane as the black hole, since their strong gravity acts in all directions. Jets from black holes shoot out in two opposite directions, but this directionality is driven by the spin of material falling onto the black hole in a disk, and by the spin of the black hole itself and isn't caused by weaker gravity acting in this direction.
P.Edmonds, CXC

Posted by P. Edmonds on Wednesday, 03.9.11 @ 11:22am

Dear Paul Boland,
Thanks for your question. You are right that the light take 11,000 years to each us, but nevertheless the star's explosion would have been *observable* from Earth about 1680 (it's not actually clear whether the supernova was actually observed, unlike the case for Tycho's or Kepler's supernova). Astronomers talk about events as observed in images, ie in "Earth's time frame". Please see:

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/cosmic_lookback.html
for more details.
P.Edmonds, CXC

Posted by P. Edmonds on Wednesday, 03.9.11 @ 11:19am

Dear Bill Matthew,
Thanks for your question, which is a good one because the theory here is complicated. We have posted additional information on our web-site that provides more details about this work. See in particular:

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2011/casa/more.html#casa3

and the bottom animation (with the long caption) at:

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2011/casa/animations.html

P.Edmonds, CXC

Posted by P. Edmonds on Wednesday, 03.9.11 @ 11:14am

Bill Matthew,
The Stefan-Boltzmann law that says that the total electromagnetic radiation varies according to the area of the radiating surface and the fourth power of temperature. They assume that the surface area of the Neutron star doesn't change significantly, so a change in luminosity corresponds to a change in temperature. The temperature can be estimated from the Neutron star's spectrum. If the temperature is dropping faster than can be explained by the loss due to radiation then it must cooling by some additional means. The additional means being neutrino emission.

Posted by billy on Tuesday, 03.8.11 @ 21:08pm

Paul Boland, what the article could have said to make things a bit clearer is, the light from the explosion reached earth 330 years ago. You can think of the explosion as having actually occurred 11,000 years before that, although, of course, relativity shows the folly of any absolute time scale.

Posted by AquaRegia on Tuesday, 03.8.11 @ 08:48am

How exciting it is to observe a stellar event unfolding on a human time scale.

Posted by kerry on Saturday, 03.5.11 @ 15:16pm

From what I have read on the internet about Superfluid is most mind boggling. Now this, Superfluid found in Caseopea A. What a great discovery.
The mysteries that await us out there are always a great learning experience and mind boggling.
This is one great article, thanks so much Chandra team.
Marvin L. S.

Posted by Marvin L. S. on Thursday, 03.3.11 @ 21:02pm

Fascinating picture. I know there is a lot of knowledge that allows the analysis to take place but could someone briefly explain the leap from an image to such a detailed belief of what is being seen?

Posted by Bill Matthew on Monday, 02.28.11 @ 15:22pm

Wow, cool.

Posted by zbethel on Friday, 02.25.11 @ 15:29pm

This news article is causing me a bit of confusion. This star being 11,000 light years away, it would take 11,000 years for the light from that star to reach us. However, the image shows the exploded star which happened only 330 years ago. How can this be? Surely if the star exploded in 1681 or there about, we should not be able to see the light of that explosion, the result so to speak, until the year 12,681 that's 11,000 years later, the time it would that the light to travel the distance of 11,000 light years.

Posted by Paul Boland on Thursday, 02.24.11 @ 22:12pm

This might be a stupid question to all who visit this site on a regular basis, but have we ever tried to see what happens to stars when they cross the same plain as the black hole in the center of their galexys? also do black holes suck or have the same pull on things that are over the top, like where it shoots out if it's a quasar? and if not, why does the gravity of a black hold go out in a 3d bubble or is more like a flat disk?

Posted by Stup id on Wednesday, 02.23.11 @ 22:28pm

As a former avid amateur, and now a present avid amateur pursuing a degree, I have always wondered what a star made out of neutrons would look like. The concept just sounds bizarre, as much as I've read about it. How wonderful are these endless mysteries.

Posted by Brendan D on Wednesday, 02.23.11 @ 20:02pm

If this Neutron Star is in line with us does it give off a signal? A most fascinating subject, always something new to learn. Thanks.

Note: Keep comments relevant. Inappropriate or offensive comments will be edited and/or deleted. To avoid appearing to endorse commercial goods or services, posts containing URLs may not be published. This post is moderated during normal business hours (eastern U.S. time); it may be several hours before they are posted. Please keep your comment short (not more than 600 characters).

Emails will not be visible or used in any way, and are not required. Privacy Policy

These are the remains of a massive star that exploded about 330 years ago, as measured in Earth's time frame.

11,000 light years from Earth.

X-rays from Chandra X-ray Observatory and optical data from the Hubble Space Telescope.