Wanted to take the liberty of sharing the following letter that I recently forwarded to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham regarding "Articles of Impeachment and Impeachment Proceedings against the Obama Regime":

Letter To Representative Lujan-Grisham:

“August 12, 2014

Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham

Capitol Office

336 Cannon HOB

Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Representative Lujan-Grisham,

On or about July 13, 2014, I sent your office my second letter respectfully requesting:

1) the “Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles”; and

2) that articles of impeachment be drafted and to commence impeachment proceedings for the numerous high crimes and misdemeanors that President Obama has allegedly committed by continually ignoring federal laws while in pursuit of his administration’s goal(s), as documented in my letter to your office of June 7, 2014, which I believe The House of Representatives has the power to do in accordance Article II, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution.

Although I never received a written response to my above letter, of July 13, 2014, I did receive a phone call from one of your office representatives regarding said letter, which I am extremely grateful for because your office was the first to do so in the past approximately six years and your representative was very professional and accommodating.

Representative Lujan-Grisham today I am taking the liberty of sharing the following recent articles and/or blogs with you in their entirety because they will provide you with a full set of Articles of Impeachment of the Obama Regime that were recently issued by the Constitutional Law division of Patriots Union (USPU), The North American Law Center (NALC), along with recent interviews with the Lead Attorney and Author of said articles of impeachment that were meticulously conducted by The Post & Email, which I believe are extremely pertinent to this issue and further support my request:

NALC is associated with the U.S. Patriots Union (USPU), which was founded by JB Williams and Timothy Joseph Harrington in 2010. Pidgeon is “lead counsel” at NALC in the area of Constitutional Law. NALC’s stated mission begins with:

Year after year, case after case, the American people have had their rights eviscerated by the American legal system. This deliberate destruction has been under the guise of effecting a “utopian global social justice system”. In actuality, what we have are judicial activists, through their lofty positions, imposing by fiat, that which should be determined through due process. These absurd, inane and socialistic decisions, substituting personal policy preferences for Constitutional imperatives, have destroyed both the intent and spirit of the Constitution, as well as the foundation of the Rule of Law.

With a law office in Washington State, Pidgeon has experience in the fields of international law, religious freedom, and U.S. export and import laws, among other areas of expertise.

Pidgeon is associated with the Alliance Defending Freedom, which advocates for religious liberty, a right enshrined in the First Amendment to the Bill of Rights. He produced a set of eight videos on topics including The Muslim Brotherhood and “the high crimes of Barack Obama.” He also published “The Obama Error” in 2011, whose synopsis reads, “Here are the facts, and here is the law. The national fabric is forever torn, and the experiment in God-breathed freedom we call America is finished. When we look back to the causes of our demise, we will most certainly find the Obama error.” Many reviews of the book at Amazon.com said that the book was “hard to put down,” “food for thought,” and written by“one of the most courageous Christian writers.”

Before Obama was inaugurated in January 2009, Pidgeon filed achallenge to his constitutional eligibility in Washington State, which has a law that “provides for any registered voter to challenge the election of a candidate if the candidate at the time of the election was ineligible to hold office,” in Pidgeon’s own words as told to WND in late 2008. At the time, Pidgeon stated that he believed that Obama was “born in Kenya,” which presumably would have made him ineligible for the presidency. In speaking with Pidgeon today, he told The Post & Email that he was not sure where Obama was born, but that the “eligibility” issue is no longer front and center of the argument to remove him from office.

Earlier on Monday, Pidgeon was a guest on Erik Rush’s “Full Contact” radio program explaining the Articles of Impeachment and the direction he hopes the American people will take to see that they are implemented by the U.S. House of Representatives.

Pidgeon told The Post & Email that “the impetus for putting the North American Law Center together was to combat what has been an out-of-hand situation with certain NGOs in this country which will go unnamed and have had a tremendous amount of funding and done a tremendous amount of damage labeling free speech groups and other political action groups across the country ‘domestic terrorists’ and ‘potential domestic terrorists.’” He said that NALC’s intention is to “fight back” and present “arguments in law to the general public.”

“I can tell you that we have done a great deal of representation in how we have addressed military issues,” Pidgeon added, which include the Rules of Engagement and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

In regard to the Articles of Impeachment directed at Obama, Pidgeon told us that there is a “legal necessity to drive the moral imperative to the House of Representatives to do the right thing.” “We’re just not willing to listen to excuses anymore. The representatives to the United States Congress were elected to a job. They took an oath to support the Constitution; there is all kinds of unconstitutional and criminal activity going on right under their noses. They have a duty to do something about it, and they need to do that duty.”

THE POST & EMAIL: How long have you been working on the Articles of Impeachment?

ATTY. PIDGEON: That’s an interesting question; probably since 2008. It’s been an ongoing task detailing his high crimes and misdemeanors. As far as the actual Articles of Impeachment, it’s been crafted over several months.

THE POST & EMAIL: Are you able to say how big the team is with whom you are working?

ATTY. PIDGEON: I’m not, but there is more than one of us.

THE POST & EMAIL: Members of Congress have been mentioning Obama’s impeachment since last summer. Reps.Blake Farenthold, Steve Stockman and Ted Yoho all mentioned it last year. I think there are many Americans who wonder why nothing has been done before now. Do you believe their hesitation stems from political correctness?

ATTY. PIDGEON: No, I don’t think so. I think it’s much more onerous than that, frankly. It has to do with inside-the-beltway, off-the-books contractual agreements that were made between the political parties. For instance, few Republicans know that the Republican Party entered into a 35-year stipulation to not sue the Democrats for voter fraud. The contract between a representative or senator and his constituency that puts him in office means nothing to most of these elected personas. The contracts that they make privately between each other’s political parties and their donors means everything to them. I believe – and this is my opinion – that there was a contract made with one of our sovereign debt-holders, namely, Saudi Arabia, to put a Muslim in office for two terms following the George W. Bush term for eight years, and all of this was coordinated back before 1992, before George H.W. Bush lost after having a 92% approval rating. He lost the election to Bill Clinton, and we saw two terms of Bill Clinton, a captain for the HWB cartel, hold office for eight yeas, and HWB’s son held office for eight years, and then we got a Muslim for eight years. That’s the contractual arrangement that was made, in my opinion. It’s a reasoned conclusion. I don’t have any documents to support that, and there aren’t going to be any documents readily available because I assure you that they’re under client confidentiality in some law office somewhere.

THE POST & EMAIL: Do you think Obama is a “foreign born domestic enemy,” as CDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III (Ret.)claimed in his March 17, 2009 treason complaint? Do you think he is a practicing Muslim?

ATTY. PIDGEON: The way it stands right now, nobody can say for sure where he was born. I’m not even sure if Obama himself knows where he was born. I have my own problems with some of the “Kenyan-born” theory primarily because of Ann Dunham’s passport history, but that’s assuming that Ann Dunham is the mother. That’s an assumption; there is absolutely nothing in his birth record that can be corroborated. What little corroboration we have concerning his life is that at one point, he was known as “Barry Soetoro” and adopted by Lolo Soetoro. That much we know. It appears that he was also adopted by Ann Soetoro at that time. That appears to be the case. His name was Barry Soetoro, Indonesian national, Muslim of Muslim faith. His adopted father was Muslim, his reported biological father was Muslim; his mother was married to two Muslim men, according to the story that’s being told. So he was born a Muslim, and if you’re born a Muslim, you are a Muslim under the rules of Islam.

He wears a ring that carries the Shahada. He recited the Shahada to The New York Times in 2007 in Arabic without an accent. Hetold The Muslim Brotherhood in Cairo in April 2009 in Arabic, “I am one of you.” If people want to deny that he’s a Muslim, then go ahead. He abolished the National Day of Prayer in order to inviteimams into the White House to pray. The New Testament says, “Ye shall know them by their fruits.” I think it’s pretty clear what his fruit is.

THE POST & EMAIL: People continue to ask why he isn’t taking action on the slaughter of Christians in the Middle East.

ATTY. PIDGEON: The fact is he trained, financed, funded and armed ISIS, and he trained, financed, funded and armed Al Qaeda in Syria. He trained, financed, armed and supplied the jihadis working in Libya.

THE POST & EMAIL: Is there documentation of that?

ATTY. PIDGEON: Yes, there is. As I said on the radio show, Walid Shoebat has a complete dossier on the documentation of what happened in Libya. He’s not the only one; the Egyptian Supreme Court has also put together a dossier under which they were able to accuse then-ambassador to Egypt, Anne Patterson, and Hillary Clinton and indict them both for inciting terrorism inside of Egypt because of their relationship with The Muslim Brotherhood to overthrow the lawful government of the nation of Egypt.

Part 2 of The Post & Email’s Interview with Obama Articles of Impeachment Lead Author!-Posted on The Post & Email-BySharon Rondeau-On July 29, 2014:

“AN EXTRAORDINARY LEVEL OF SCRUBBING”

by Sharon Rondeau

(Jul. 29, 2014) — On Monday, the lead attorney for Articles of Impeachment issued by the North American Law Center (NALC), Stephen Pidgeon, spoke with The Post & Email at length about how and why the Articles were written and how they might be moved into the House Judiciary Committee for consideration.

The NALC’s impeachment document contains three Articles:

Usurpation of the Oval Office via Criminal Identity Fraud

Malfeasance, misconduct and abuse of the Oval Office, and

Aiding and abetting known enemies of the United States.

In Part 1, Pidgeon told The Post & Email that Obama has “trained, financed, funded and armed ISIS,” a barbaric terrorist group which is attempting to take over Iraq and participate in ethnic cleansing of Shia Muslims, Christians, and anyone else who fails to submit to their rule. In recent weeks, ISIS has murdered at least 1,000 people as its members have stormed across Iraq and parts of Syria in its goal to re-establish an Islamic caliphate in the Middle East.

Continuing from the discussion in Part 1, Pidgeon told us:

Doug [Vogt] put together a phenomenal affidavit that was filed in federal court here in Washington. Doug is a great guy; he’s very smart and very acute is what he does. As a consequence, his move into the federal court was not something frivolous; it was really quite substantive. What he put across, I thought, was ultimately very, very good because his sealed file ended up before the United States Supreme Court. The fact that that happened is extremely significant because his file is, in my view, really dispositive evidence. He knows who did the forgery, and the identification of the forger appears directly in the document. That kind of information becomes extremely important to an investigator. With that being said, I did speak with [Cold Case Posse lead investigator] Mike Zullo for a while when he was in the early stages of the investigation. But my documentation was already set out in “The Obama Error.” A lot of people didn’t read that, but if they had, they would have seen that the book is an affidavit of probable cause against Obama. It goes through the litany of offenses that had been committed. It’s a little old now, but I can tell you that back then, I was able to establish that the initialCOLB, the Certification of Live Birth that Obama proffered which was a self-admitted forgery, also qualified as an impeachable offense. Impersonation under the federal statute is a serious felony.

THE POST & EMAIL: Is there something to substantiate that he is someone other than who he says he is?

ATTY. PIDGEON: Yes, I believe that he is “Barry Soetoro” at some level. I’ve spoken with a fellow who was in Project Pegasusunder the CIA with Obama in 1981. He’s given me personal, eyewitness testimony as to when Obama elected to use the name “Obama.” He knows exactly when it happened: what year it happened, who suggested that it would be a good idea for him to use it; the whole of the story is there at present. Is he engaged in intentional identity fraud? Yes.

THE POST & EMAIL: So you believe that his real name is “Barry Soetoro,” it looks as if at some point, probably when he was a young adult, he “slid” into using the name “Barack Hussein Obama II.”

ATTY. PIDGEON: That’s correct, and then thereafter, of course, the files were cleansed to reflect that that’s what his name was.

THE POST & EMAIL: I’ve heard this from other people, too. Martha Trowbridge has a theory that Malcolm X is the father and that his background was cleansed when he began using the identity “Obama Hussein Obama.”

ATTY. PIDGEON: That is certainly one theory, but we can’t get that confirmed until somebody does a DNA test, which is not going to happen any time soon. You do know that he was detained in Russia in 2007?

ATTY. PIDGEON: It was on the suspicion of his being an MI-6 agent. I do talk about that in “The Obama Error.” Under the citizenship laws of the United Kingdom, which are a factor in American jurisprudence, believe it or not, he did, in fact, become a citizen of the United Kingdom automatically because of his age. We don’t know if he was operating under a British passport; all I know is that he was detained in Russia under suspicion of being a British agent. In order for them to do that, they probably – I’m not going to say they did – but there is a chance that they actually reviewed and saw a British passport.

Conclusion of The Post & Email’s Interview with Atty. Stephen Pidgeon on Obama Articles of Impeachment!-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On August 10, 2014:

“WE EITHER ACT, OR WE LOSE THE NATION”

by Sharon Rondeau

(Aug. 10, 2014) — In an interview with The Post & Email on theArticles of Impeachment issued by the North American Law Center (NALC), lead attorney Stephen Pidgeon stated that “grassroots support” is needed to move them into the House Judiciary Committee.

The U.S. Constitution provides for the accusation, trial and removal from office in the event of conviction for federal officers, including the president and commander-in-chief. Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution states:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

In Part 1, Pidgeon told The Post & Email that NALC’s goal in issuing the Articles of Impeachment is to “drive the moral imperative to the House of Representatives to do the right thing.”

Pidgeon also stated that Obama “trained, financed, funded and armed ISIS,” the barbaric radical Islamic group which has murdered innocent men, women and children in the most heinous of ways in ethnic cleansing on a level not seen since Hitler’s conquering of Europe in the early 1940s.

Pidgeon said he has been in touch with Douglas Vogt, who filed a petition which ultimately reached the U.S. Supreme Court asking for a grand jury review of evidence he compiled on the forgery of Obama’s long-form birth certificate. Pidgeon said that he believes Vogt’s filing was “extremely important to an investigator” into Obama’s background and documentation.

Pidgeon said he has also “had some discussions with Mike Zullo,” who is the lead investigator of the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse, which, after six months of investigation, found that Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration form are “computer-generated forgeries.”

In 2011, Pidgeon wrote “The Obama Error,” which he described as “primarily an affidavit of probable cause.” “It goes through the litany of offenses that have been committed,” Pidgeon told us. “Back then, I was able to establish that the initial COLB, before he got into the long-form birth certificate, also qualified as an impeachable offense. Mispersonation under the federal statute is a serious felony.”

Pidgeon believes that “Obama” began using the name by which he is currently known as a young adult.

In Part 2, Pidgeon told us that he spoke with a former CIA operative who knew Obama in 1981 and had knowledge of when and why Obama adopted a new identity. Pidgeon said that at that point, Obama’s past was “scrubbed” at an “extraordinary level” to hide the fact that he is a Muslim, among other things.

Obama’s admittance into Harvard Law School is of particular interest to Pidgeon. He believes that Obama’s Harvard education was funded by Saudis to prepare a “Muslim candidate” for the presidency in order to satisfy U.S. creditors, among them Saudi Arabia. “We know that there’s a direct link between SheikhAlwaleed bin Talal and the funding of Obama going into Harvard. Sheikh bin Talal funded $25,000,000 for an Islamic study center, and the demand that was made on the back side of that advance was that a certain person would be admitted into Harvard Law School, ” Pidgeon said.

He continued:

The person who was advancing some of this was Khalid al-Mansour, the founder of the Black Panthers, who had converted [to Islam], and he was the one who developed the relationship with Sheikh bin Talal. If you look closely at Mr. Obama’a record when he was in Chicago prior to his rise to power with the Democrats, back in the days when he was a Socialist Workers Partycandidate, you’ll find out that he spent most of his time fundraising for the PLO and other hard Islamic groups that were operating inthe Levant. That’s what his prior record looks like. He wasn’t a community organizer; he was a fundraiser for Islamic groups.

In all fairness, my review of Obama’s record during the ’90s does not indicate that he ever crossed the line where he was actually raising funds for prohibited organizations. There’s nothing that shows that he raised funds, for instance, for Hamas Hezbollah, or some of the other well-known jihadi organizations which are strictly prohibited under federal law. But there was no question that he was raising money for Islamic groups including Al-Fatah that would advance a claim against Israel, which was the brunt of his focus throughout all of the 1990s.

“Is there documentation of these claims which no one else has yet seen?”

I wouldn’t say no one else has seen it. I’ve provided all of the documentation of that in “The Obama Error.” There is documentation behind every one of the claims in the Articles of Impeachment. Some of it includes live testimony; some of it is documented fact. Most of the documentation that has been produced in this regard, however, it well-substantiated, well-known documentation. You don’t have to go far to find the record, because people don’t care about the record anymore.

“In the event that the House of Representatives hasn’t seen the documents you have, if they saw them, would it be enough to convince even the most recalcitrant congressman to vote for impeachment?”

No, because, of course, a congressman thinks in terms of political ramification. They don’t think in terms of legal ramification. It’s a political issue, not a legal issue, at least until somebody is arrested. You can rest assured that no one at the Justice Department is going to arrest anybody on these issues; that simply won’t happen. You’re asking Mr. Holder to go in and raid the hen house, and he’s not going to do it.

A lot of this documentation is preexisting, well-known material. To give you an example, the documentation concerning Fast & Furious: Congress has already taken testimony from an ATF agent who went “whistleblower” and explained to them what was happening. So Congress knows everything that took place in Fast & Furious: the fact that there were thousands of weapons, including over 35 50-caliber sniper rifles that were delivered in a so-called sting operation to Mexican drug cartels. They know that; that was given in live testimony before Congress. And those weapons were later used to kill American border agents and other Mexicans in Mexico City. So they really cannot avoid the reality that is before them. In order for them to avoid it, it has to do with snickering and sneering in arrogance against the American people and saying, “We don’t care what you think. We don’t care what you think, we don’t care what you want…we are your masters, and we’re telling you what to do, how to think, and when to think it.” That is the approach. This is something that Americans have to deal with. As I mentioned on the [Erik Rush "Full Contact"] show, we’re not here to stir up any kind of a rat’s nest; we’re just asserting the truth of the statement: “These are the federal laws that have been violated by this president.” It’s very straightforward stuff.

“And that’s outside of the identity fraud.”

The criminal identity fraud is, of course, first and foremost. We had long discussions to take care of that particular set of laws. If you say “the emperor has no clothes,” then you have to first suffer the slings and arrows of ridicule from people who believe that he does have clothes. That has happened, but nonetheless, when we have a president who has undeniably usurped the power of the office, how can you possibly look at the other crimes he’s committed without addressing the elephant in the room?

“Does Congress know that he’s committed identity fraud?”

Yes, they do. In many cases, they’ve heard from the CIA directly about what kind of uncovering will happen in the event that they come forward and say anything about what has happened. The identity fraud is the clearly provable path. We could sit and argue the esoterics of whether or not he’s a “natural born Citizen” of Article II, Section 1, clause 5 going back to the [John] Jay decision and what was the expectation of citizenship compared to the 14th Amendment. I’ve been down that path a million times, and there’s nothing wrong with that path.

“Because someday we should know exactly what the founders meant by the term, although I think a lot of us know.”

I think we do, too. But the thing is that that’s not the issue here. The issue is that whatever it is Obama has produced is forged. That is a significant issue, because when you file a forged long-form birth certificate for purposes of obtaining a federal job, you have committed a serious federal felony. That’s on the table.

“They would never have let Richard Nixon get away with something like this.”

Remember, Richard Nixon was expelled for political reasons. This isn’t a question of politics anymore; it’s a question of the survival of the United States. I think it’s really important for your readers to understand that the reason he has gotten away with this is because of an underlying contractual obligation into which certain people entered without the provision or disclosure to the people of the United States in order to further their own personal political careers. Once you can see that, now you know why they can’t let him go; why he is “golden,” if you will.

“So they’re pretending to represent their constituents, but there are other things that are paramount.”

Oh, absolutely. Their pocketbook is paramount; their political career, their pocketbook, and in some cases, their deals. Now some people might argue, “If we hadn’t done this, the Saudis wouldn’t have continued to buy our debt.” That’s one way of negotiating. But what if we had actually charged the Saudis for what it had cost us to mount a defense on their behalf in Kuwait?

“Then there wouldn’t have been any debt.”

Right. So somebody has been cooking the books, saying, “You owe us money for the service you provided us.” I like it; I like the thinking.

“It’s interesting that you said Obama has ties to the Saudis. On one of his shows within the last two months, Carl Gallups, who has been very close to the Cold Case Posse’s investigation, said, ‘Weknow that Obama comes from a deep Sunni background.’ Then his son Brandon said, ‘And we know that he has ties to Saudi Arabia.’ So you’re saying a lot of the same things they’re saying.”

Sure. The reason I’m saying them is not because I have evidence, but because it can be readily deduced from the history. It’s well in the public record that this funding came forward from Sheikh bin Talal. You may say, “That’s not an indication that Obama is actually Muslim; that’s just an indication that he had some funding help from a particular Arab sheikh.” OK, now let’s add that to the fact that he was born Muslim; let’s add that to the fact that he has a ring with the Shahada on his finger; let’s add that to the fact that he now has seven members of the Muslim Brotherhood sitting in cabinet positions in the White House…at some point, you have to say, “Gee, I wonder if he’s Muslim?”

“Given all of this, in your opinion, can this situation be rectified?”

The answer is: This is why we introduced the Articles of Impeachment. We have reached that point in American history where we either act, or we lose the nation. It’s really that simple. There’s really not anything more involved than that. We either act, or the nation is gone. If we’re going to act, we need to act lawfully, and the lawful pursuit of action for all Americans is an impeachment methodology.

I’m not interested in arguing if impeachment is the correct methodology: just do it.

“A lot of people say, ‘He’s not eligible, so he can’t be impeached.’ But perhaps his eligibility would become clearer if we could get discovery.”

You don’t have to worry about any of that. He has been sworn into office; therefore, he holds the position by color of title. If he holds the position by color of title, you cannot exercise a different method against him. You are required to bring Articles of Impeachment, because otherwise, he has sovereign immunity.

This is why that whole argument is moot. What needs to be done is he needs to be charged with high crimes and misdemeanors.

“Constitutionally, is there an option whereby if impeachment were to happen this summer, Sen. Harry Reid could refuse to hold a trial in the Senate for political reasons?”

He could, although our position is that Harry Reid is disqualified, because he has been shown to what arguably could be considered a co-conspirator to keep the identity of Mr. Obama a secret from the American public. We would demand his recusal. He cannot do anything because he’s somebody who is going to be criminally named in this action.

“Are the Articles of Impeachment with the House Judiciary Committee?”

Not yet. What we’re asking for is help in disseminating the information. You know the website of the North American Law Center. We are trying to get a grassroots movement so that people can download the Articles and then forward them to their congressmen. It’s a very straightforward process. If people say, “It can’t be done,” then it won’t be done.

“We know that some members of Congress say they want impeachment. Rep. Steve King said that it will happen if Obama keeps issuing executive orders, and Rep. Steve Stockman said that Obama is ‘begging to be impeached.’ So it’s not as if it hasn’t been on some of their minds.”

It won’t be long now before the truth surfaces, and the truth will prevail. That is, as you might imagine, an extremely big deal, because once the truth comes out and people say, “We knowwhat the truth is now,” it’s not subject to a debate, and it’s not subject to somebody else calling you a name. I think most Americans who have any sense of alertness whatsoever are well aware of the fact that we are on the verge of completely losing the nation. I think that’s a big driver for people and that if they take steps to contact their congressmen with these Articles, we will be able to move forward.

For your information, I have been working tirelessly for the past approximately six years to get to the bottom of what I now consider to be the greatest fraud perpetrated in American history and believe that I have come across overwhelming evidence that may prove that we in fact have a fraud and a usurper that resides in the people’s White House, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. This evidence clearly indicates that the conspiracy to carry out said fraud was much broader than originally thought, which includes a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell because the evidence suggests that our supposed President was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance, as documented in my letter to your office of July 13, 2014.

As you probably know by now, I am a retired Marine Corps Mustang Officer and when I was commissioned I was required to take the following oath:

“I, (state your name), having been appointed a (rank) in the United States (branch of service), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the office upon which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

This oath specifically states that the Constitution will be supported and defended against all enemies and it acknowledges that the enemy may be found on foreign soil or in one’s own backyard.

As you know, any commissioned officer and/or public servant who takes this oath and then conspires or is a party to an act or actions that seek to undermine by purpose of evasion, the spirit and intent of the Constitution of the United States would fit the definition of a traitor.

What concerns and/or pains me immensely is that, although our own elected representatives constantly remind us that they support our troops that continue to give their all, to include their lives to uphold and defend our Constitution, they stood by while Army LtCol Terry Lakin was stripped of his honor and had everything taken from him, to include his freedom, for simply abiding by his oath as a military commissioned officer by having the fortitude to question President Obama’s Constitutional eligibility to hold the office of President and Commander-In-Chief of our armed forces.

What follows is a link to my blog that will provide you with more extensive details and/or information, along with numerous sources, regarding what actually happened to LtCol Lakin:

Thousands of other Americans have also respectfully asked their own elected U.S. representatives to look into his eligibility status even prior to our 2008 Presidential election and/or shortly thereafter, as I did, but to-date have not received a satisfactory response from those elected officials whose solemn duty is to protect our Constitutional individual and God-given rights, along with protecting us from all enemies, foreign or domestic, even if that enemy is within our own government.

What follows is a link to my blog that contains copies of letters that I forwarded to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor, the then US Attorney for the District of Columbia, our NM US Representatives, and our local FBI Field Office in 2009 requesting that they look into President Obama’s eligibility status to hold the office of President and Commander-In-Chief of our armed forces, as it relates to Article II, Section I of the United States Constitution, to no avail:

What follows is a link to my blog that lays out said evidence of alleged fraud, along with my other blogs that contain copies of numerous letters that I have forwarded to our other NM U.S. Representatives and our NM Governor in the past approximately six years requesting that they look into President Obama’s eligibility status to hold the office of President and Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces, as it relates to Article II, Section I of the United States Constitution, to no avail:

My sixty-seven years of life experiences have taught me that in most cases silence breeds contempt and, after approximately six years of no response and/or relief from my own elected officials, I am now of the opinion that this is what we may be currently experiencing in our beloved state and/or country today, which I honestly hope and pray is not the case.

Representative Lujan-Grisham, after approximately six years of requesting assistance from our NM U.S. Representatives and our NM Governor regarding this extremely disturbing and time sensitive issue to no avail, I have recently decided to step up to the plate and register on the following National Liberty Alliance (NLA) website as a means of being placed on a jurist pool to serve on a Common Law Grand Jury in my county for the sole purpose of helping other concerned Americans in our state and/or country to get to the bottom of the alleged fraud that I believe has been perpetrated in our Country/Republic:

I have also reached out to other concerned Americans and asked them to join me in this cause by also stepping up to the plate and registering on said website so they can be placed on a jurist pool in their counties. Hopefully together we can work to get to the bottom of the alleged fraud that has been perpetrated in our Country/Republic and finally see justice take its course against those individuals who may have had a hand in perpetrating said fraud that is literally destroying our Country/Republic as we knew it, which I also believe is the perpetrator’s ultimate goal, as also documented in my letter to your office of July 13, 2014.

Additionally, I would also like to take the liberty of sharing the following recent articles and/or blogs and video that relate to and/or further support the above articles and/or blogs, along with my request regarding this extremely disturbing issue:

Finally, I again am respectfully requesting that the U.S. House of Representatives draft articles of impeachment and commence impeachment proceedings for the numerous high crimes and misdemeanors that President Obama has allegedly committed by continually ignoring federal laws, as documented above and in said letter to your office of June 7, 2014, while in pursuit of his administration’s goal(s), which again I believe The House of Representatives has the power to do in accordance Article II, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution.

Please feel free to contact me at my email and/or home address.

I look forward to hearing from you regarding this extremely disturbing and time sensitive matter and I thank you for having your representative recently contact me by phone.

Thank you for contacting my office. I appreciate you taking the time to share your views with me. I will review your message and get back to you as soon as possible. If you have a time-sensitive issue or request, please call my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 225-6316. If you need assistance with a federal government program or agency, you can call my Albuquerque office at (505) 346-6781.

To receive regular e-mail updates on my work as your U.S. Representative, visit my website,lujangrisham.house.gov/contact/newsletter, and sign up for my electronic newsletter. It allows me to keep my constituents informed about the most recent activities in the House of Representatives and upcoming events that I am sponsoring in the district.

Michelle Lujan Grisham

Member of Congress”

End of Letter To Representative Lujan-Grisham.

For your information, I will inform you should I happen to get a response from Representative Lujan-Grisham regarding this extremely disturbing and time sensitive issue.

Note: The following articles and/or blogs, videos and audio relate to and/or further support my above letter to my Representative-You Decide:

Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed articles and/or blogs, please copy website link and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide:

Calls For Obama’s Impeachment Could Well Grow Louder With Army’s Decision To Charge Bergdahl: ‘The Obama administration had hailed Bergdahl as having served with “honor and distinction...”!-Posted on Western Journalism-By NORVELL ROSE-On March 25, 2015:http://www.westernjournalism.com/calls-obamas-impeachment-well-grow...
Food For Thought”
God Bless America!
Semper Fi!
Jake

Forum

19 Signs Of Very Serious Economic Trouble On The Horizon By Michael Snyder, on April 5th, 2012 Most Americans have no idea how much economic trouble is heading our way. Most of them just assume that everything will eventually “return to normal” just like it…Continue

Photos

Ten Commandments of Human Relations

The fundamental issue in human ethical behavior is summarized by Jesus in what we have come to call "The Golden Rule." Jesus put it this way:

So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets (Matthew 7:12 TNIV).

It asks us to test our treatment of others by putting ourselves in their place. Treat others the way you would want them to treat you in the same or similar circumstance.

Somebody took that principle and translated it into Ten Commandments of Human Relations. You may have seen this anonymous piece, for it circulates in a variety of settings. In case you have missed it, I am reproducing it here.

Speak to people. There is nothing as nice as a cheerful word of greeting.

Smile at people. It takes 72 muscles to frown, only 14 to smile.

Call people by name. It is music to anyone’s ears to hear the sound of his or her name.

Be friendly and helpful.

Be cordial. Speak and act as if everything you do is genuinely a pleasure. If it isn’t, learn to make it so.

Be genuinely interested in people. You can like almost anyone, if you try.

Be generous with praise, cautious with criticism.

Be considerate of the feelings of others. There are usually three sides to a controversy — yours, the other fellow’s, and the correct one.

Be alert to serve. What counts most in life is what you do for others.

Live with a good sense of humor, a generous dose of patience, and a dash of humility appropriate to being human.

Made in God’s image, all of us have something to be valued!

The great challenge in human experience is not work skills, but people skills. That is, research has shown that the majority of people who fail in their vocation do so because they cannot get along with people.

You might think through the meaning of these ten common-sense ideas for your own workplace and personal activity. But what about the larger setting for your daily life? These principles work everywhere you go, for they are about showing respect to the people you meet in all those places.

Made in God’s image, all of us have something to be valued, affirmed, and acknowledged by others. But let it begin with us to acknowledge it in them. As the cycle of giving and receiving enlarges, the human community comes alive.