Treason: Benghazi Revelations Could Sink Obama

This is a discussion on Treason: Benghazi Revelations Could Sink Obama within the Politics forums, part of the Main Category category; Treason: Benghazi Revelations Could Sink Obama
November 7, 2012 By Kris Zane
On Sunday November 4, late in the day, ...

Treason: Benghazi Revelations Could Sink Obama

On Sunday November 4, late in the day, an odd video appeared (or rather was buried) on CBS’s website, entitled “Obama Suspects Libya Attack Targeted Americans.”

It was odd in that for several weeks, the Obama administration had finally dropped the idiotic narrative that the attack on the Benghazi consulate was caused by a “mob turned violent” over an obscure anti-Muslim video that no one had seen.

A closer look at the video shows that it was in fact taped on September 12, a few hours after Obama made vague remarks about the attack in the Rose Garden. That it was part of a 60 Minutes interview that CBS had clearly suppressed.

Why was the video suppressed?

It didn’t fit the narrative. Even though we later found out that Obama watched the attack on the Benghazi consulate in real time. Even though we later found out Obama had received an email that went directly to the White House Situation Room blaming the al-Qaeda-linked group Ansar al-Sharia, Obama in this suppressed video refused to call it terrorism. That Obama, in the suppressed video, oddly at the same time, thought the “mob turned violent over a anti-Muslim video” was equally ridiculous.

It was obvious what Obama was trying to do in the interview. He wasn’t sure what lie he was going to tell the American people about the attack and wanted to be as vague as possible.

But it wasn’t vague enough. It didn’t fit the narrative.

So it had to be suppressed.

What we now know is that Barack Hussein Obama was shipping weapons from Libya to Syria—arming the al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked Syrian rebels—yes, our enemies—with Ambassador Chris Stevens as the point man—and needed a cover story to keep it out of the public’s eyes.

On Sunday November 4, late in the day, an odd video appeared (or rather was buried) on CBS’s website, entitled “Obama Suspects Libya Attack Targeted Americans.”

It was odd in that for several weeks, the Obama administration had finally dropped the idiotic narrative that the attack on the Benghazi consulate was caused by a “mob turned violent” over an obscure anti-Muslim video that no one had seen.

A closer look at the video shows that it was in fact taped on September 12, a few hours after Obama made vague remarks about the attack in the Rose Garden. That it was part of a 60 Minutes interview that CBS had clearly suppressed.

Why was the video suppressed?

It didn’t fit the narrative. Even though we later found out that Obama watched the attack on the Benghazi consulate in real time. Even though we later found out Obama had received an email that went directly to the White House Situation Room blaming the al-Qaeda-linked group Ansar al-Sharia, Obama in this suppressed video refused to call it terrorism. That Obama, in the suppressed video, oddly at the same time, thought the “mob turned violent over a anti-Muslim video” was equally ridiculous.

It was obvious what Obama was trying to do in the interview. He wasn’t sure what lie he was going to tell the American people about the attack and wanted to be as vague as possible.

But it wasn’t vague enough. It didn’t fit the narrative.

So it had to be suppressed.

What we now know is that Barack Hussein Obama was shipping weapons from Libya to Syria—arming the al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked Syrian rebels—yes, our enemies—with Ambassador Chris Stevens as the point man—and needed a cover story to keep it out of the public’s eyes.

Arming of our enemies?

That’s treason in my book.

And if I remember correctly, that’s grounds for impeachment.

Put the pipe down (or adult beverage) and understand, this man and his administration is untouchable. I completely agree that this whole ordeal and MaoBama's involvement was treasonous BUT like DOJ and the rest of this corrupt administration the American People will NEVER get the true answers. As a caveat, I do believe this is part of the reason the Second Amendment is the Second Amendment. The ability of the people to protect its self from a tyrannical government.

Hoping that our politicians will act in an honest and honorable way is a dream. Most don't even know the meaning of those two little words. They are much too afraid of the reaction of the media. Cowardice and dishonesty, after Tuesday's election, appear to be the main qualifications for a successful candidacy. The voters, thanks to our educational system and the media, have no idea of what truth is. Perhaps their ignorance is a protective mechanism against the horror that this country is destined face very soon.

Yea, I remember when Reagan was impeached for Iran-Contra...and all the arms we shipped to the Mujihadeen in Afghanistan when UBL was fighting the Russians, and working with Saddam against Iran. And W was a choir boy with all that fake intelligence that got Americans killed, warrantless spying and such. Foreign policy is full of such shady crap - has been for years. At this point all this looks like is more throwing **** at the wall to see what sticks.

Reagan wasn't impeached. Seems all of you liberal jackasses are nothing more than delusional hacks if not pathological liars.

Congress may appoint a "special commitee" to look into the Libyan mess, they'll parade and huff & puff and blow a bunch of BS in front of the tv cameras for Fox, the only ones that will cover the story for a few weeks then the whole thing will dry up & blow away just like fast & furious because the mainstream media sure as hell won't cover anything negative about their little muslim posterboy.