Sunday, July 8, 2012

Time was, men trusted women. Women were granted the
inalienable right to identify the father of their children.

In a culture that respects women it is assumed that her
husband is the father of her child. Thus it is assumed that women are faithful and loyal to their husbands.

For their part women have aspired to be worthy of that
trust.

While there is, obviously, never any doubt about who is a
child’s mother, there is always a doubt about the identity of a child’s father.

Of course, in backward cultures women have been enslaved and
oppressed for fear that they will lie about a child’s paternity. These
practices say that women are not to be trusted, and should not be allowed to exercise free will.

Since the link between father and child depends on a woman’s
assertion, explicit or implicit, of the identity, children have traditionally borne
their fathers’ names.

Of course, modern science makes it possible to “trust, but
verify.” Paternity tests can prove scientifically who the father is.

But that means that men no longer need to trust women. In
many ways this is not a good thing.

Now, to add a new wrinkle to the debate a University of
Richmond law professor named Shari Motro offers up a hypothetical.

FOR
most of human history, a woman who became pregnant after sleeping with more
than one partner had no way of definitively knowing the identity of the man
with whom she had conceived. Likewise, a man whose lover became pregnant had no
way of knowing for sure whether his or another man’s DNA was gestating inside
her.

Motro is worried about “the relationship between unmarried lovers who conceive.”

Step back and take a deep breath here. I know that you are
shocked to discover that a law professor can be quite this ignorant.

In Motro’s hypothetical unmarried women have unprotected sex
with both their lovers and other men, at roughly the same time. Better yet,
their lovers know about it.

These women are cheating and are indiscreet about their
cheating.

How many women do you know who behave this way?

Motro is suggesting, correctly, that throughout human
history there have been women who have had unprotected sex with several partners.
For reasons that ought to be fairly clear such women have often been disparaged for their behavior.

Is there a word that aptly describes a woman who is in love
with one man, has unprotected sex with him, and then goes out and has
unprotected sex with a couple of bartenders?

I will not write the word, because I do not want to offend
the delicate moral sensibility of any young woman who is capable of such
actions.

Here we are in the era of free contraception for everyone, condom
dispensers in every Lady’s Room, birth control pills covered by Obamacare… and
we are being asked to recognize the possibility that today’s liberated woman,
who has had the condom message drummed into her head from the time she was in
kindergarten, can be involved in a loving relationship and can still run out and have unprotected sex with the hockey team.

In any event Motro is trying to think through implications
of a scientific discovery. Apparently, you no longer even have to wait for
amniocentesis; a new blood test on a woman can determine the identity of her
child’s father.

Once paternity is established, Motro recommends that the man
in question be forced to pay for whatever choice the woman freely makes. If she
decides to abort he should provide financial support. If she decides to have
the child, he will be obliged to offer support.

But, Motro asks, what if this leads men to pressure their
girlfriends who have cheated on them to have abortions.

Clearly, forcing a woman to have an abortion is abusive, but
what will happen if the man threatens to walk away from his cheating
girlfriend.

Will a law that forces him to pay the expenses suffice to
keep him around? Or will it cause him to take make the situation public by taking the case to court?

Of course, this assumes that the cheating lover knows who
the other men are, and that she can get DNA samples from them, the better to
make the comparison.

But, why do we necessarily assume that she knows their
names?

Apparently, Motro wants to make men pay. She calls the payment “preglimony.” The word sounds
ridiculous, so I find it to be an apt reflection on the quality of her thought.

But, here’s another hypothetical. Let’s say that this
less-than-honorable woman has sworn to each and every one of her multiple
sexual partners that she is taking the pill—provided for free by Obamacare-- and
thus that she cannot possibly become pregnant.

Should the unlucky soul whose swimmer first made its way
to her ovum still be obliged to pony up?

The wonders of science do not have an ideological bias. If
we are going to test unmarried women to see who fathered their children, why
not test all mothers?

If DNA testing establishes that a married woman has lied to
her husband by claiming that a child is his when it is not, why would she not
be sued for fraud?

Even if she is not sued for fraud, what if the test causes
her husband to abandon her? How strong will his case be in divorce court?

Yes, I know that these questions have been subject to
adjudication. I am simply pointing out that if you follow the logic of Motro’s
argument, such as it is, you might be putting women in a position that they
might prefer to avoid.

8 comments:

There was a news item recently about a woman whose lover discovered her in the bathroom using a syringe to extract the semen from a used condom, in an attempt to conceive a child by him. This sort of thing does happen all the time, and the standard feminist line is that the man should be liable for unlimited child support.

This behavior can only be justified when either or both the man and woman do not perceive their lives to be defined through investment. Fortunately, this character trait seems to be only present in a minority of the population. It has to be; otherwise, none of this would work, ever; and humanity would be simply dysfunctional.

Another question is if this behavior can be inculcated, and if individuals who desire its free but corrupt outcome are promoting its normalization.

The modern American woman, especially if a feminist, can be trusted to be discourteous, impolite, rude, selfish, self absorbed, disrespectful, hypocritical, irresponsible and spiteful. But in a way we, as a society, have made them that way. We have given them the idea that they are something special and that they are all little Princesses that will have their every wish and desire fulfilled by lower beings called men, either through the individual or government.As the old feminist joke goes,"Men are like floor tile. Lay them once right and you can spend the rest of your life walking on them." Can one really blame them when this is the message that they learn every day of their lives? There was an old Bugs Bunny cartoon in which a witch spends the whole time trying to do away with Bugs. Bugs eventually turns the witch into a female rabbit and they walk away hand in hand. Bugs; final comment is something to the effect that we all know who they are, inferred, understand it and enjoy it.If one wants something better then one needs to work to change things. Women are NOT inherently distrustful. The vast majority of them are capable of great love, friendship and responsibility. We just need to create different ideas of what it is to be a functioning person.

In this world if anything that can clearly distinguish you from others or proves your identity is nothing but DNA testing, so whether it is in case of forensic lab requirement or anything research it becomes really important. Thanksssss……

I have range of tried and tested Love Spells which range from bringing back a lost love, to break-up, spells which can return your soulmate from another and back into your arms. I can cast a spell for any occasion and I can construct custom spells designed around your wishes.

(1) If you want to get your ex back.(2) If you always have bad dreams .(3) Do you want to be promoted in your office.(4) You want women / men to run after you .(5) If you hotiterebenka .(6) Do you want to be rich.(7) Do you want your husband / wife will be yours forever.(8) If you need financial assistance .(9) Herbal care and more

if you need any of this spell above to be cast for your sake, kindly contact me today at ozaspelltemple@gmail.com for the right solutions to your problems.