Use Application Format and fee as prescribed in Centre/State RTI Rule as applicable to the public authority. Whenever your complaint or grievance is not addressed by the concerned office like Municipality, Electricity Board, BSNL/MTNL, University or any such other public authority, within reasonable time, say 10 to 20 days, you can file RTI Application with the Public Information Officer of that public authority and seek following information

Can we submit complaint U/s 18(2) of RTI Act to State Information Commission to enquire into the irregularities committed by concerned staff in Govt office by enclosing all the relevant documents
Sent from my CPH1701 using RTI INDIA mobile app

I made complaint online on 1.cpgram and 2.aapale sarkar two different complaints. Both complaint were transfer to urban department from there it was transfer to BMC headoffice from BMC headoffice it was orally told to myself that we will transfer it to your ward Commissioner Office but after visiting several times to Commissioner Office they told me your complaint is not traceable/transfer to our department. Even online it is in BMC headoffice department displaying. So I wrote RTI what is the status of my complaint and who is responsible person to urban department they replied me that your complaint has transfered to BMC headoffice. And if you want to appeal you can appeal giving address of Appealate Authority. Does i have to wait or i have to go for appeal ? Please guide. And what should I ask in first appeal.
Sent from my SM-G7102 using RTI INDIA mobile app

Hello
My mobile phone was stolen in a bus station then immediately i went to police station and filed a complaint.Still there is no response from them. So can i file an RTI act to know the status of my complaint? whether RTI will make police to start working on my complaint? please do help me

Hello,
I had sent a RTI application to PIO but he refused to accept and returned me with 10 rs. IPO.
Can any one help me to draft Complaint against PIO.
I attached returned RTI by PIO.
01.01 RTI application to Rajawadi.pdf

The commission having heard the submissions and perused the record, directs the PIO/Auto Rickshaw Unit to treat the RTI application of the appellant as complaint and inquire in to the same and send action taken report to the appellant within 15 days with a copy to the Commission.
CIC_SA_A_2015_000524_M_158282.pdf

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday took exception to the fact that despite its ruling that governments should not insist on the possession of Aadhaar card for the disbursal of benefits under the social welfare schemes, there were states that were flouting its order.
A bench of Justice J Chelameswar, Justice SA Bobde and Justice C Nagappan expressed its concern over states acting in breach of its interim order passed in September 2013 and reiterated in March this year in this regard.
At the outset of the hearing, Justice Chelameswar pointed to court's earlier order asking the central and state governments and their agencies not to link the disbursal of benefits under various social welfare schemes with Aadhaar card.Read more at;
Why are states still insisting on Aadhar card, asks SC | Zee News

Hello friends,
In one case in Distt Consumer forum respondant filed false affidavit and hon'ble President of
DCRF Delhi in his judgement mention that respondant has given wrong information by filling wrong affidavit.
Kindly guide what is the procedure to punish the respondant for filling wrong affidavit.
Who will issue the notice ?
regards

An RTI activist has filed a complaint with the State Information Commission (SIC) against the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HLCL) for observing in breach of its previous order to allow him to inspect its dumping sites in the summer capital.
The RTI activist Dr Raja Muzaffar Bhat said he had filed application on May 13, 2014 before Senior Regional Manager HPCL who is also its Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) to seek details of retail LPG outlets allotted in ........
Read more at: RTI activist files complaint in SIC against HPCL

Hello,
I am planing a complaint Section 18 (1). What are the relief can be sought under this Section. My grounds of complaint are: (i) Non hearing of First Appeal for Five Months (ii) False information by CPIO. (iii) Misleading information by CPIO on few points.
What relief can be sought under RTI Act, if I file a complaint?
Regards,

1) I had filed a RTI Application to Labor Department ,Govt of Sikkim, asking to furnish the Utilisation of CESS (In Sikkim Labor Dept. Collects the CESS).
On reply the SPIO furnished that they have spent Rs. 50 lakhs to provide TVs to the Labors for their entertainment.
2) Upon getting the Reply ,i filed another RTI asking the SPIO to furnish the location and places where they have provided the TVs for labors.
This time the SPIO furnished they have not provided any TVs to labors.
3) Since I got two replies related for same subject i.e.
In one reply they said they have provided TVs to the labors.
And in another reply they said they have not provided TVs to labors.
Which I concluded the SPIO supplied contradictory information which in RTI act term could be said as MISLEADING INFORMATION.
Taking the two reply, I filed complaint to CIC Sikkim explaining everything. The CICI said , I have go through First Appeal.
I said ,this is not a case of appeal. The SPIO has furnished Misleading information, which is proved by comparing two RTI Application and FA has no jurisdiction to compare TWO RTI Replies.
The CIC said I should read the RTI Act on which I said ,I know the Act ,and this is a fit case to take action against SPIO for providing misleading information.
The CIC denied the plea and ordered me to go to FA. But I have no ground to go to FA.
Please enlighten me here, I believe the SPIO is guilty of providing misleading information here. And FA has no power to punish SPIO.
What should I do?
Whether my contention was right?
I hope the esteemed members will guide me here.

I complained to Lokayukta related to panchayat housing facilities, I complained lost 3 months back, once they come and checked the some sample of unconstruction house, after till date there is no action, pls guide what I need to do next for it, I am frm karnataka
Sent from RTI INDIA Mobile App

Hello,
sir i file a rti to PIO - cum - sec. market committee .I get reply from PIO on 20.10.2014 .but that information was wrong .can i complaint in sic against PIO that he provide wrong information to me . plz also draft letter for complaint if possible

The data on ragging was revealed in a reply given by UGC to an RTI application filed by a student of the School of Law in KIIT University, Odisha, Rohit Kumar. "I had sought the information in December 2014 and I got a response only in May 2015. Such delay in replying is a contravention of the RTI law. I had applied through the online RTI portal on December 12 through email but the UGC office claims that it received my application only on April 30, 2015. Is an email delivered in 5 months?" asked Rohit.
According to the RTI reply, UGC received 640 complaints in 2013 and 543 in 2014 and an FIR was filed in nine cases in 2013 and in 57 cases in 2014. Rajendra Kachroo, father of ragging victim Aman Kachroo felt it was not necessary to file an FIR in all cases. "If the university authorities can resolve the matter by punishing the guilty students with suspension or such measures, that is good enough. An FIR will just mean that the matter drags on. But in the small percentage of cases that are not settled, the UGC ought to intervene and exercise its authority over the colleges, which it does not do," said Kachroo. He added that a large number of complaints coming in from UP and Bihar could be because there was a lot of violence and lawlessness in the colleges.
Read at: 1,183 ragging cases, 66 FIRs in two years - The Times of India

There was high drama at the M G Road Metro station on Tuesday evening at the ongoing global crafts fair, Crafts Marche, when a team of BBMP officials reached the spot following complaint about encroachment on the footpaths by the stalls.
As part of the fair, about 35 exhibitors from across the globe including Sri Lanka, Burma and Thailand are showcasing their handicrafts.Read more at;
Crafts fair shops shifted after complaint of encroachment

Hi,
Could anyone please help me to draft the RTI?
We have filed mass petition / objection letter to the concerned municipality chairman (Dum Dum Municipality) on 6th May 2015. But till now no action has been taken. Municipality Officers are not giving any information/ cooperating with us regarding this issue resolved. Also they are verbally saying that the construction is not authorized without checking their records. They are also not willing to give any written reply of our petition. So I would like to file RTI against them for seeking the information why they are not giving any information to us and not doing any investigation.
This is a open secret that the Municipality had taken bribe from the concerned party for the illegal construction. The construction is now at full swine and not a single person has come to investigate the issue.
Please help me to write the RTI.

The ICON IC Mr. Yusufi has transformed the complaint under field U/S 18 of RTI Act into the second appeal without any cause of it (File No. CIC/KY/C/2014/000341 decided on dated 01.05.2015). He also preferred to chose to by pass the ingredients scribed in complaint on pretext of complainant not attended the hearing or without not giving any opportunity to complainant for appearing on any other suitable day to come in. Is the action of Mr Yusufi is in consonance with the law of land as on today?

The Union Defence Ministry has taken note of complaints of human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir referred to it exclusively by the J&K police or the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). Most of these cases pertain to civilian killings in the state.
On past Tuesday, the Defence Ministry disclosed in the Parliament that Army headquarters has received 19 complaints of “human rights violations” by soldiers in Jammu and Kashmir during the past three years.Read more at;
HR violations: Army takes note of ?referred? complaints only