> Thanks Andrew, there argument was to fool checkers, but I dont like
> that idea, the checkers I use ask if you've deliberately left it null
> so to me it wouldn't be an acceptable practice.
>
> cheers
>
> Geof
> At 09:08 AM 2/23/2010, you wrote:
>>Looks like a subtle way to get round failures on automated accessibility
>>checks.
>>
>>Can't see it doing any harm, but there is no need for it either...just
>>adds
>>superfluous code as null alt tags can just be alt=""
>>
>>