A technology professional's experiences with and observations about new technology products, new developments such as virtual environments, artificial intelligence, online gaming, entertainment and streaming services and software particularly image editing applications and Filemaker Pro.

Pages

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

I was really excited to read this announcement. Almost eight years ago I viewed a 3-D movie entitled "T-Rex: Back to the Cretacious" at the Imax Theater in the Luxor Hotel in Las Vegas when I was attending Comdex and was really impressed with the advancements that had been made in 3-D technology even then! I felt like I was literally looking over the shoulder of the archaeologists in that film. Since then I have kept an eye out for other interesting 3D films but haven't been able to see any others. If Disney and Pixar start releasing all of their films in a 3D version that should help out with available content. Apparently the 3D process is now such that separate filming does not have to occur to produce both 2D and 3D versions. The theater owners should hail this announcement as a way to offer a viewing experience that will not be replicated in a home environment for quite some time.

"The Regal Entertainment Group, the world’s largest cinema operator, has reached an agreement to equip 1,500 screens to show three-dimensional films.

Regal will install the technology once Digital Cinema Implementation Partners, a group of theater exhibitors, completes plans for an industry conversion to digital projectors.

Friday, May 16, 2008

I find the assumption, contained in this article, that a resource compiled by "average" people should not be used by students and academic scholars is not only an injustice to the thousands or even millions of earnest Wikipedia editors but smacks of elitism. Many Wikipedia articles include extensive bibliographies and references and even include quotes from print sources that would be gladly accepted independently.

Furthermore, as a Wikipedia editor myself, I can attest to the efficacy of their hierarchal editorial dispute resolution process and the diligence of their "only" volunteer watchdogs.

I would hope that our own faculty would at least consider incorporating the contribution of materials to Wikipedia as a worthwhile endeavor for both themselves and their students. Based on the list of institutions utilizing Wikipedia in their teaching and learning activities, I think we would be in good company!

"What are academics supposed to do with Wikipedia? On one hand, Wikipedia has just about anything one needs to know on its website. Need a list of every Poet Laureate? What about a brief history of the fall of the Roman Empire? Wikipedia is inarguably the easiest method of obtaining information on just about everything. On the other hand, there is no peer review on Wikipedia; only volunteer watchdogs. If the majority of the watchdogs say the information is correct, then it stays on the website. Badke claims, “If the average university student can safely go to Wikipedia instead of consulting a specialized print reference source, then academia is broken.”

Some academics argue that the problem isn’t with Wikipedia. Perhaps the fact that students need to be told in the first place not to use Wikipedia is the bigger concern, and a testament to the standards of those admitted into that university. The standards of a university that admits students who may use Wikipedia needs to be examined, along with the students trying to use this user-monitored website.

Wikipedia has responded to the concerns of academia by proposing a way for academics, students and Wikipedia to work together. Wikipedia is encouraging professors to teach students how an open content website works and having students post their work on Wikipedia. By asking universities to participate with students in submitting term papers, projects or notes to the website, it is the hope of all involved that, since the world will see students’ work, an increase in dedication to the project will subsequently occur. By doing this, in theory, students will continue to work with their preferred medium, and academics can rest easy, knowing that the university-posted information is indeed accurate. Some of the schools participating in Wikiversity, as it is called, include Texas A&M, University of Hong Kong, University of Pittsburgh, Northwestern University and University of Tokyo. Professor Jon Beasley-Murray, professor at the University of British Columbia, promises his students an A+ grade if their projects are accepted as a Wikipedia Featured Article."

Latest Tweets!

College Level History Courses!

About Me

I am passionate about technology, education and history, particularly ancient history. I am constantly exploring ways to use technology to enhance the learning environment and am particularly ecstatic when I can develop a technology to advance the study of ancient history.Follow me on Twitter! Comments or Questions: mharrsch@uoregon.edu

Share your knowledge with Information Age Education!

Information Age Education (IAE) is a non-profit organization with a goal of helping to improve the education of people of all ages around the world through technology. IAE assumes that every person is both a lifelong learner and a lifelong teacher. As a teacher, each person helps themselves and others to learn.
The Information Age Education (IAE) project will grow and prosper through the volunteer work of people who:

1. Contribute content and/or edit the content provided by others. The IAE-pedia is a Wiki available at http://IAE-pedia.org.

2. Contribute open source books and articles for students of all ages, for publication at http://i-a-e.org.

3. Contribute ideas and/or discuss the ideas presented by others. The key contact people are Dave Moursund (project director) and Ken Loge (technical consult, multimedia wizard, and Web Master). Contact them by email with your ideas for content and for Website design.

4. Share the Information Age Education ideas with others, and encourage others to contribute their volunteer content and ideas.