Monday, December 20, 2010

Brazilian President becomes ‘Santa Claus’ for homosexuals as reign ends

December 20, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) — Brazilian President Luiz Lula da Silva has become the “Santa Claus for gays” as his reign comes to an end, approving hundreds of millions of dollars for pro-homosexual propaganda, as well as a new government agency to promote the gay agenda.

In addition, Lula’s administration has begun to distribute “kits” to children between the ages of 7 and 12 years designed to encourage them to accept homosexuality. The kits reportedly include a DVD with a story about a fourteen-year-old who goes to the bathroom, and becomes sexually aroused while watching another student urinate in the stall next to him.

The DVD has sparked outrage from Jair Bolsonaro, a representative in the Brazilian National Congress, who denounced it in a recent floor speech as “shameful.”

Brazilian pro-family activist Julio Severo wrote recently: “The old man with the white beard of fiction (Santa Claus) gives inoffensive and innocent presents to children. The bearded man of the PT (Worker’s Party) guarantees the distribution of gay kits for schoolchildren.”

Severo’s claim that Lula has become the “Santa Claus for gays” has been adopted by the homosexual movement. Toni Reis, the leader of Brazil’s most influential homosexualist organization, said in a recent meeting with the President that “Lula is a very good person. He even has a white beard. He’s the Santa Claus for gays.”

Facing its final days, the Lula administration has made a last-ditch effort to pass its proposed “Homophobia Law,” also known as PLC 122, which would allow the government to silence all criticism of homosexuality. Despite the ultrapopular president’s support for the measure, and a majority pro-Lula coalition in the Brazilian Congress, his administration has never been able to pass the bill. His efforts failed for the last time earlier this month.

Despite the loss, the Lula administration has showered the homosexual movement in Brazil with a panoply of gifts in the waning days of his administration. They include the creation of the “National Council to Combat Discrimination” (CNCD), whose apparent purpose is to bolster the power of the gay lobby. One of the members of the council will be Luiz Mott, the self-styled “dean” of the homosexual movement, who has made statements in the past suggesting the endorsement of pedophilia.

The creation of the CNCD on December 9, at the request of homosexual activists, followed the allocation of $178 million to combat “homophobia” in November. On the same day, Lula’s administration approved the awarding of pensions to homosexual couples, as well as other privileges normally reserved to married couples. On December 13, the administration gave the “Human Rights Award” to Reis, who is President of the Brazilian Association of Gays, Lesbians, and Transsexuals.

Lula’s enthusiasm for the homosexual agenda has been manifest throughout his administration. During his eight years in office, he has subsidized the homosexual movement with millions of dollars in aid, has moved to shut down television programming that criticizes the gay lifestyle, and has promoted international agreements to combat “homophobia.”

What is really behind WikiLeaks?

If WikiLeaks equals free speech, then why do those defending it want UN to impose censorship on the internet?

By Julio Severo

Out of curiosity, it was great to learn about the US embassies' cables, and it would also be very interesting to see the Brazilian ambassies cables. Sadly, there was still no leak from such secret communications of Brazil.

Excepting some exotic facts, did WikiLeaks reveal really sensitive information? In one of the leaks on critical installations for the US security, there is a mention of an Australian factory that produces antivenom. Can you believe that if Islamic terrorists attack the Australian factory, the US will be vulnerable to the largest attack of snakes in human history?

The scenes would be terrible: snakes biting Obama and his government officials. Thousands of poisonous snakes slithering in the streets and attacking thousands of participants in the gay parades from San Francisco to New York. Snakes in schools, hospitals and soccer stadiums, with millions of people falling to poisonous bites.

Poor snakes! They are being used as scapegoats for some big scheme. And there are other absurdities in the leaked list of possible terrorist objectives.

I doubt a lot that Islamic terrorists have swallowed the story of the Australian factory as vital for the US security. But I don’t doubt that behind WikiLeaks there are “snakes” and “serpents”, but not of the type that we know in nature. They are depraved human minds with the nature of astute and evil snakes.

Unfortunately, WikiLeaks didn’t reveal any really important American secret. If it had tried to do so, the American government has enough secret agents and enough power to “solve” the problem. In fact, CIA has for decades murdered people, killing really wicked men, but also eliminating innocent people, including in the famous case where an airplane, with a family of evangelical missionaries, was shot down.

The book “Target: Patton, The Plot to Assassinate General George S. Patton”, by Robert Wilcox, tells how the birth of the US service secret, infiltrated by Marxists, was followed by secret assassinations of criminals and innocent people.

Nothing hinders CIA from neutralizing the enemies of the US interests. However, Julian Assange is alive, and receiving massive support from famous Marxists, even in the US, that advocate control over internet — a control to keep an absolute predominance of their ideas and exterminate conservative ideas.

Recently, Assange got financial support from Michael Moore, producer of a documentary on “homophobia.” As far as it depends on Moore, supreme jester of Hollywood Marxism, free speech is a right to be granted only to those who take an oath of fidelity to sodomy.

Brazilian president Lula da Silva is one of the international personages protesting “persecution” against Assange and, in the public eye, he defended the right of free speech of WikiLeaks. Hey? Where is Lula whose administration has always sought to censure internet in Brazil?

Yet, Brazilian diplomats in the UN, under Lula, are spearheading an effort to create a UN agency to police internet, under the pretext of avoiding leaks similar to WikiLeaks’. The same Lula that advocates for the free speech of WikiLeaks is using it to restrict free speech of worldwide internet users.

If the WikiLeaks case were so serious, why is Assange alive? Why does WikiLeaks remain online? Why does Lula support it? And there are other strange facts. The man that gave WikiLeaks the allegedly sensitive information about the US was an American homosexual soldier. So why is the US government so determined and obsessed in guaranteeing that open homosexuals may serve in the military?

If WikiLeaks represented threat to the US security, then who should suffer banishment, repression and exclusion: homosexuality or internet free speech? How to explain that the most powerful nation in the world “let” thousands of allegedly confidential cables be leaked? In the show produced around WikiLeaks, who will the real victim be?

Just after the recent leaks of WikiLeaks, the Department of Homeland Security, with no notification, seized the domain names from dozens of “dangerous” websites, which were not connected to WikiLeaks. It was a swift censorship with no right to defense. But, with all its massive power, the US government and its thousands of secret agents in the whole world have feigned to possess little power to shut down WikiLeaks, whose existence became a mere excuse to silence websites having nothing to do with Assange, who is a favorite to be the Time magazine “Man of the Year”.

By pretending to reveal secrets, WikiLeaks eventually left a thick cloud of doubts over the real occult intentions of those that are using it, or against or in favor, to impose cyber patrolling and an era of darkness where internet is a restricted area of security against those that disagree of the New World Order and its politics of intrusion and control over people, families and children.

Friday, December 10, 2010

Brazilian senate approves $178 million to promote gay agenda

BRAZIL, December 10, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) — The Brazilian Senate recently approved a massive $178 million budget to fight “homophobia,” a term that includes criticism of the homosexual lifestyle.

The funds will be spent as part of the government’s national homosexualist program, “Brazil Without Homophobia,” which funnels part of the money directly to homosexual organizations.

The funds are also used to pay for legislative initiatives to create special rights for homosexuals in Brazil. One such initiative, the “Homophobia Law,” also known as PLC 122/06, would make it illegal to criticize homosexual behavior in Brazil.

President Luiz Lula da Silva is pushing for the approval of the law in the final days of his administration, a feat he has not been able to accomplish after eight years in office, despite his massive popularity, pointed out Brazilian pro-family activist Julio Severo. His successor, President-Elect Dilma Rousseff, has promised not to promote such legislative initiatives, an assurance she gave voters when her campaign seemed threatened by her party’s historic support for socially liberal measures.

The Brazil Without Homophobia program will also be used to promote the homosexual political agenda at the international level, and in the nation’s schools. This year the country’s “Schools Without Homophobia” program is featuring a campaign to normalize transvestitism in the schools.

However, Lula’s passionate advocacy of homosexualism is not likely to succeed in Brazil’s current political and cultural climate. Recent elections indicated that the public is hostile to such initiatives, which is reinforced by recent poll results showing a large majority of Brazilians in opposition to homosexual civil unions.

Wednesday, December 08, 2010

BRAZIL, December 7, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Brazilian people overwhelmingly reject the homosexualist and abortionist agenda of the nation’s ruling party, according to a new study conducted by the polling agency Vox Populi.

The poll revealed that 82% of Brazilians wish to maintain abortion as a crime, and 72% are against its depenalization. Religious differences only changed the latter result marginally, with 75% of Evangelicals, 73% of Catholics, and 69% percent of other religions opposing depenalization.

In addition, sixty percent of Brazilians are against the creation of homosexual “civil unions,” while only 35% are in favor.

The poll indicates that Brazilian Evangelicals are more successful communicating their churches’ condemnation of homosexual unions than Catholics. While only 19% of Evangelicals supported such unions, 37% of practicing Catholics supported them.

Even a majority of nonreligious Brazilians, 56%, oppose homosexual “civil unions” according to the poll. However, members of non-Christian religions, who are generally associated with African spiritualist cults, were the most likely to support civil unions, with 59% in favor.

The results are a slap in the face for the ruling socialist Labor Party and its allies in the National Congress, which have endeavored to eliminate criminal penalties for abortion and promote special rights for homosexuals. Books, television shows, and other forms of expression that condemn homosexual behavior are subject to fines and other penalties in Brazil, and President Luis Lula da Silva has sought to pass legislation to make “homophobia” a crime.

In Brazil’s recent elections, president-elect Dilma Rousseff was forced to make a written promise not to promote a pro-abortion or homosexualist agenda if elected, after seeing her poll numbers slip in the face of massive criticism of her previously-stated positions on those issues.

The statistics also undermine the image of Brazil as a sexually libertine society, an idea popularized by the excesses of celebrations held in major cities for Carnival, the period immediately before the penitential season of Lent. Brazil has also been the scene of the largest homosexual parades in the world in recent years, which have been partially financed and promoted by the federal government.

In addition to the results on abortion and homosexuality, the poll indicated that a large majority of Brazilians, 87%, are also opposed to the decriminalization of illegal drugs.

Sunday, December 05, 2010

Brazilian President Lula acknowledges “Palestinian” State

Without imposing on them any condition on gay “rights”

By Julio Severo

Lula announced that he decided officially to acknowledge a “Palestinian State. That acknowledgment happened on November 3, 2010.

The Brazilian megalomaniac likes to be in the center of the attentions. And if the whole world is looking to the Middle East, because of the afflictions of Israel, then Lula wants a piece of the spotlight. He is determined to spend his last days in the Brazilian presidency drawing the attention from everybody, even if it means that he needs to make a handstand in the United Nations headquarters.

The Brazilian press reported that Lula sent a letter to the “Palestinian” leader acknowledging the State of “Palestine.” The international media said almost nothing, not because the subject is insignificant, but because Lula doesn’t have the importance that he gives himself.

However, why to recognize a nation inside of another nation? Geographically, what some call “Palestine” is exactly inside the historical and biblical borders of Israel. And Israel is an extremely small country. Therefore, it makes no sense to force a small nation to relinquish her scarce lands to a people that have ethnic, political and religious hostility against Israel.

If Lula wants intensely lands for “Palestinians”, why doesn’t he give them a piece of Brazil? Geographically, the land of Israel is a mosquito in comparison to Brazil. It is unfair to force a small nation to relinquish what little she has. The bigger nation has the moral obligation to give the example and share what she has more than enough.

But there is more. In the lands occupied by “Palestinians”, homosexuals are really attacked and murdered. Gay marches? Never, even in thoughts! Anti-“homophobia” indoctrination in the “Palestinian” schools? It would bring death penalty on teachers. Early, “Palestinian” children are taught to hate and attack enemies of Islam. Israel, of course, is one of those enemies. And homosexuals also.

Tolerance and plurality? Those concepts, thoroughly imposed by the Lula administration on the passive Brazilian people, are abhorred by “Palestinians.” “Palestinian” homosexuals just don’t request asylum from Lula because they have no enough time. As soon as they are discovered, homosexuals there are dispatched.

A “Palestinian” State in the middle of Brazil would not be a strange experience, because children learning how to hate is something that the communistic Landless Movement (linked to the party of Lula) has been doing there for a long time. The biggest problem would be “Palestinian culture” affecting Brazilian culture. Then the Brazilian government would have to change the federal campaign “Brazil Without Homophobia” to “Brazil Without Sodomy”, exclusively to appease and please “Palestinians.”

While this doesn’t happen, Brazilians have to suffer, being forced to accept anti-“homophobia” indoctrination in the schools and the lie that Brazil is champion of murders of homosexuals (as if Brazilian Christians were killing hundreds of them a day), and to see Lula giving prestige, honoring and acknowledging an Islamic State that wants not only the destruction of Israel, but of homosexuals.

If Lula were not hypocritical, he would tell the leader of the “Palestinians”: “Well, my administration acknowledges the Palestinian State, but with a condition: Your Palestinian administration should hinder your people from persecuting and killing homosexuals and your administration should teach children to love homosexuality as a totally normal and healthy option.”

Does anybody really believe that “Palestinians” would accept such condition?

The difference between them is clear. While the interests of the “Palestinians” rotate around Islam and terror, Lula’s interests rotate around his own navel and that hole idolized by homosexuals.

In fact, “Palestinians” have their special ideal solution for the worshipers of holes: to increase in them, through bullets, the number of holes!

Can you see what is happening? If all Christians from Brazil were “Palestinian” and especially Islamic, Lula and his administration would respect us, would honor us and would give prestige to us, whether we were or not murderers of homosexuals.

Who is stupid in that story: Lula or the Brazilian people?

If Lula wants to continue in the international spotlights after his presidency, he will have to disguise himself as a transvestite in front a “Palestinian” mosque and to scream: “You need a campaign Palestine Without Homophobia!”

The following scene would not be recommended for people under the age of 18.