tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25200961.post3066262772360952844..comments2016-11-15T16:38:59.571+00:00Comments on Dr Grumble: Call for better diabetes services.Dr Grumblehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04417731064007601504noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25200961.post-78163639855395018612009-01-18T18:56:00.000+00:002009-01-18T18:56:00.000+00:00All sort of rumours are circulating about this cas...All sort of rumours are circulating about this case. It has been suggested that the problem was that a deceased patient's relatives had been contacted. Unfortunately this happens quite often. The reason it happens is the the lack of the sharing of data. One part of the system knows the patient has died but data controls prevent the other part having this key information.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25200961.post-52456954684111771142009-01-17T12:15:00.000+00:002009-01-17T12:15:00.000+00:00Dr GI believe you do her a disservice by printing ...Dr G<BR/><BR/>I believe you do her a disservice by printing these pictures. Of course, as we all know hob nobbing with the rich and famous is not a default reason to keep someone in their job. I think the best reference for SB is from her patients. <BR/><BR/>She has some nice saries by the way - but her ability to fight a good battle is hampered by her requirement to be politically correct. She should never have been sacked of course and I think a mere slap on the wrists would have been enough. That said, Sam above is partially right. Being a victim is not getting her anywhere. This case should have been wrapped up by her lawyers by countersuing the Trust. I doubt she will play a tactical game but then she never does. She plays a game that says " Hey, look I am the sitting duck, come get me". The problem is this - the Trust board were out to get her, have been out to get her for years, she has given them ammo to get at her - and now the situation has become so complex that getting out of this situation will be hell on earth. <BR/><BR/>A simple issue can become extremely complex. I should know - as I fought the right to link to a public document on the internet with the GMC stretching GMP to the limits that no one has ever seen before. You start playing that sort of game - it isn't the right thing to sit around being a victim. <BR/><BR/>So, SB needs a good lawyer, Queens Counsel. She needs to accelecerate her defence and she needs to stop backing down. Of course, she won't listen to me - she never does. <BR/><BR/>RPAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25200961.post-89090331453036396712009-01-11T14:49:00.000+00:002009-01-11T14:49:00.000+00:00Her integrity, compassion and clinical abilities w...Her integrity, compassion and clinical abilities were never in question Dr G. However, if she was indeed being hunted, she gave them the opportunity to sack her on a plate buy transferring those files. The appeal panel can only go by the documents in front of them and it seems she was unable to prove she was being pursued in a vindictive manner, if indeed this was the case. But to the appeal panel, those documents in front of them proved that she did breech confidentiality despite 'repeated' warning .. It is such a shame!<BR/><BR/>Two wrongs don't make a right and no one is immune from the law! It is a lesson for doctors to take note of .. as for this Dr, I hope she finds a better post that will appreciate her calibe as a caring and able doctor.samnoreply@blogger.com