The Bible IS clear on that one:
They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord, the
God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman. (2 Chronicles 15:12-13)

And what did Jesus say about God's Law?
"For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled"
(Matthew:5:18)

Pretty clear that MAN cannot pick and choose which of GODS's laws to follow and which to cast by the way side out of convenience.

That changed what the Holy Mother Church found it was more profitable to tax pagans than it was to outright kill them. God didn't change the law the
Pope did. Over time people drifted away from the Church and it is a shadow of it's former self and lacks the power over the masses that it once
held.

Galatians4 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.For
this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.But Jerusalem which is above is free,
which is the mother of us all.

The Bible IS clear on that one:
They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord, the
God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman. (2 Chronicles 15:12-13)

And what did Jesus say about God's Law?
"For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled"
(Matthew:5:18)

Pretty clear that MAN cannot pick and choose which of GODS's laws to follow and which to cast by the way side out of convenience.

That changed what the Holy Mother Church found it was more profitable to tax pagans than it was to outright kill them. God didn't change the law the
Pope did. Over time people drifted away from the Church and it is a shadow of it's former self and lacks the power over the masses that it once
held.

Of course I could be wrong.

And you are ("until all be fulfilled" being the key), see response to cuckoold on previous page as well as~

Romans10
For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

Romans 3
But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets

Acts15
saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.And the apostles and elders came together for to
consider of this matter. And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while
ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us;
And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the
disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?
But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.

Galatians 3
for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.

Hebrew7
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest
should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a
change also of the law. For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another tribe, of which no man gave attendance at the altar. For it is
evident that our Lord sprang out of Juda; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood.And it is yet far more evident: for that after the
similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless
life.

Its not the people or their ethnicity its their ideology as a whole that needs to wither in history's sands. The Muslim dislike and distrust is not
artificial it is through experience and ideology. Blaming the West is getting to be a very old tune and it was fun for a while but im done. We need to
call this ideology what it is and that is evil.

I agree 100%.

Honestly, I wont blame people anymore for stereotyping Muslims/Islam and doing the whole "Guilt By Association" with them. Its starting to be a
very warranted way of thinking.

MORE "GIBBERISH" on HOW it FEELS?
YET STILL ignoring the question of how to help the issue.
ONLY expounding on an EMOTIONAL comparator of INACCURATE and PURILE substance ,BRAVO .
Man your loft PERCH and PARROT the same.
WHAT ...SHOULD ...WE DO...TO TELL...WHO WE ARE SUPPOSED TO FIGHT as opposed to those WHO ARE NOT WITH the hellish 44%.
MY IQ is only 115 and I can't get it but I wouldn't compare our OUTRAGE against the 6TH century TACTICS of WET PSYOPS to something as CLEARLY
defined as NAZIS...THEN again I do READ HISTORY subjects which is RARE apparently.

That begets the argument of whether Christ knew he was Devine, and if he knew he was Devine; was a sacrifice even made in the name of mankind or did
the Christ simply shed the mortal coil and return to a spiritual form?

That begets the argument of whether Christ knew he was Devine, and if he knew he was Devine; was a sacrifice even made in the name of mankind or did
the Christ simply shed the mortal coil and return to a spiritual form?

Galatians 4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law..

Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy
him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.For verily
he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham. Hebrews2

My opinion on Islam is that it should not be thought of as a religion, but an ideology that affects the very basic behaviour, expectation and desire
of every follower of Islam. In itself that would not be a bad thing I suppose, if its actual aims were in fact pacific. They simply are not peaceful
though. And I know people talk a lot about "moderate" Islam etc. Such a thing is in fact an oxymoron by its very definition. One has to admire the
true belief of a follower of Islam. Their absolute belief in the tenets of their ideology. It is true belief (notice I avoid the word Faith), so much
so that it affects every single facet of their lives.

Now to the question at hand, and the idea that fear is being spread.

Fear IS being spread, my question is, is this fear misplaced? How did I ask to be hated to the extreme where I can be killed, in my street, simply for
the reason of not being a follower? Where did I sign up for that? I don't remember doing that. So is my fear misplaced? Am I NOT in danger of a random
attack from a crazed fanatic? Let me rephrase before I hear the typical" you are in danger of any psychopath"... Am I in danger of being killed by a
fanatic simply because I am not a follower of Islam?

Perhaps we should remember, as it appears it has been ignored, that IS and other fanatical people are promoting the ideology that anyone who isn't a
follower of the true Islam (Sunni) should and indeed are being killed. In the most barbaric ways. Many of these victims are other FOLLOWERS of Islam.
The unbelievable fact is that this is so. Yet it is NOT "moderate" Islam that is gaining pace is it?

Another argument is that not all Muslims agree with such barbarous acts.

The problem as I see it is that there has been no MASSIVE back turning, rejection, disapprobrium of the acts of these fanatics by followers of Islam
en masse. I know there has been a #notinourname campaign...hardly the type of "name and shame" one would expect from moderates though is it? The fact
is that for a follower of Islam, the rejection of the idea of Jihad is basically taking away a fundamental idea behind the ideology.

Speaking as a citizen of Spain, where "radical" Islam wants to create whole enclaves within every city...see catalunya, Madrid, Andalucia and Sha'
ariah law in Spain, should I NOT be scared?

1 Corinthians 15 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass
the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.

Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away 1Peter1

Yes radical Muslims behead people, are there suddenly differing degrees to murder? Gunning someone down in church, in front of his family is
bad, but beheading is EVIL.

I've been thinking about this a lot lately - for weeks actually

How incensed we are at a beheading - how indifferent to other kinds of death-dealing we've become

There's no getting around it - it's a cruel, monstrous thing to do. But how odd it is really - that we consider some methods more palatable than
others - as a people and as a culture. They've used the beheadings against us. It''s been a very effective tool

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.