What has become of Jermichael Finley? DId the Packers re-sign him? Not saying we should sign Finley, but whatever happened to that idea of picking up a veteran TE who would be getting cut from another team? It seems to me we could cut two of our current TEs if we picked up one good one who couldn't make the 53 man roster from another team.

And speaking of TE/H-backs, WHY could we not just keep BOTH Hynoski and Connor?

Since the Giants primarily have always used the TE as a blocker, wouldn't it make sense to dump one or two of our current TEs in favor of keeping both Hynoski and Connor... one would play FB, and the other would have the Bear Pascoe H-back role (essentially a hybrid FB/TE). It makes perfect sense to me, and we keep two great blockers and dump one or two of the dead weight TEs we currently have taking up roster spots.

What are your Giants / Pats predictions for tonight and the season to come? Leave a 30 second video with your comments athttp://sportschatvideo.com/football.html -- The most popular clip wins a Sports Chat Video t-shirt.

@Skookaloop ... Yeah, I think Robinson SHOULD be cut, but I doubt he will be. Cutting Behre for Bowman makes logical sense as well, but since when is Reese/Coughlin very logical when it comes to roster management?

@Jeff Comerford .... I would love to keep Quarles. I kind of wish it would be at Kuhn's expense however. That guy is always injured. There needs to be some way to keep Quarles, because I can guarantee you if he is cut, some other team will snatch him up quickly before we're even given the chance to offer him a practice squad position. And even if he made it to our practice squad initially, he wouldn't remain there for long (as any team could come and snatch him away later).