George Galloway wrong on Scottish independence

Liam Mac Uaid takes issue with George Galloway’s rejection of an independent Scotland.

June 2, 2012 -- Socialist Resistance -- British Labourism’s deference to the reactionary trappings of the
British state is as old as the movement itself. The party’s attitude to
Elizabeth Windsor’s diamond jubilee has been proof enough of that. The party has
always been a willing accomplice of British imperialism. Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair started
wars in Afghanistan and Iraq draping himself in the union jack. Previous
Labour governments have enthusiastically conducted or supported
colonial wars.

Even some on the left of Labourism aren’t immune to the contagion.
George Galloway has a well deserved reputation for being one of the most
anti-imperialist politicians of the last three decades. Yet he has
expressed a visceral hatred of the idea of Scottish independence that
pushes up against the boundaries of rationality and is accompanied by
levels of personal abuse directed against his critics that is unlikely
to lower the temperature in a debate.

In an article for the Socialist Unity website with the heart on its sleeve title, "Socialism would wither and die in an independent Scotland", he envisions a bleak future for the country if it were to leave the United Kingdom.

Drawing on the capacity for striking imagery which makes him such a
rousing speaker he predicts “brother will be turned against brother”. He
goes on to foresee that wages will be driven down, Catholics and
immigrants will be the victims of pogroms and, most alarmingly, that the
country would see the sort of violence that accompanied the breakup of
Yugoslavia. Not even Conservative British Prime Minister David Cameron is predicting that.

Galloway’s commitment to the integrity of the British state is fairly
mainstream in the Scottish Labour Party and among the country’s union
bureaucracies. His visions of Armageddon are very much his own. There’s a
good material reason for this loyalty to the idea of the union. Blair,
Gordon Brown and the late John Smith all rose to the top of the British Labour
Party. Alistair Darling, former chancellor of the exchequer, will be
fronting up the anti-independence campaign to which Galloway is so
committed. Being part of the British state allows Scottish politicians
to move from being prominent figures in a small country to “global
leaders”.

Here’s how another opponent of an independent Scotland put the issue:

“We’re stronger because together we count for more in the world, with
a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council, real clout in
NATO and Europe, and unique influence with allies all over the world.
We’re safer, because in an increasingly dangerous world we have the
fourth-largest defence budget on the planet, superb armed forces and
anti-terrorist and security capabilities that stretch across the globe.”

David Cameron’s message is that Scotland leaving the United Kingdom
would see that country diminished as a player on the world stage. While
Cameron might see something positive in the British state squandering
such a vast portion of its wealth on the fourth largest defence budget
in the world, Galloway and every other socialist would much rather see it
spent on things that are socially useful. Cameron and a big chunk of
the anti-independence camp see a self-governing Scotland as a weakening
of British imperialism. If for no other reason than that the pro-UK left
should see a big positive in it.

It’s quite an imaginative leap from sectarian rivalry, much of it
focused on two football teams, to pogroms and Yugoslavia-style carnage.
In Scotland it’s an Irish export which has put down some local roots. A
big difference is that in Ireland sectarianism was an active part of
British government policy over centuries. After Partition it was the
policy of the northern state, the major political parties, industry and
sections of the trade unions. This is not the same as drunken brawling
between football fans.

To the extent that there is a violent right wing in Scotland its
emblem is the Union Jack. Have a look at any group of Rangers
supporters. Taking Scotland out of the British state immediately weakens
not just their ideological foundations but it’s a blow to [pro-British] unionism in
the north of Ireland.

The assertion that an independent Scotland will certainly be poorer
is not backed up with any evidence. The pro-independence campaign has
sections which are committed to a more equal distribution of wealth.
Even the Scottish National Party's Alex Salmond stands outside the pro-austerity consensus that spans
the not so wide chasm between Alistair Darling and David Cameron. An
independent Scotland with a much more equal division of incomes, strong
trade union rights, an ecologically sustainable development strategy won
through a mass campaign will not weaken the working class in the rest
of the British state, it will inspire it.