Wednesday, January 15, 2014

LBJ's war on poverty -- and ours -- Jan. 15, 2014 column

President
Ronald Reagan liked to say America fought a war on poverty and poverty won.

Latter-day
Reaganites have been quoting their hero a lot on the 50th
anniversary of President Lyndon Johnson’s declaration of unconditional war on
poverty.

Like most glib remarks, though, Reagan’s famous line isn’t entirely accurate. The
war on poverty certainly hasn’t ended poverty, but the programs and benefits its
critics malign have helped reduce the pain of poverty for millions.

“Poverty
has declined by more than a third since 1967,” President Barack Obama’s Council
on Economic Advisers reported in its assessment of the War on Poverty at 50.
When tax credits, food stamps, housing assistance and other benefits are taken
into account, 16 percent of the population was living in poverty in 2012, down
from 25.8 percent in 1967, the council said.

Don’t
get me wrong: These statistics are nothing to celebrate. It’s deplorable that nearly
50 million Americans – one in six of us -- struggle with economic deprivation. Even
more disturbing is that many are stuck at the bottom of the ladder. Social
mobility is greater in Canada than in our land of opportunity.

The sad fact is that many Americans still live “on the
outskirts of hope,” as Johnson said in his 1964 State of the Union address. But
the solution is not to abandon the fight or yank the safety net.

“Our
task is to help replace their despair with opportunity,” Johnson said half a
century ago, and it should be ours as well. By “our task,” LBJ did not mean
only members of Congress. He urged all Americans to join in the effort.

Most
Americans didn’t join -- beyond paying their taxes and perhaps giving to
charity. The work of helping the poor falls heavily on churches and community organizations,
but they can do only so much.

It
needs to be said that some commentators and politicians, Reagan among them,
made political hay by focusing on abuses of the welfare system, which fed the
public’s cynicism. When he ran for the Republican presidential nomination in
1976, Reagan talked about a “welfare queen” who supposedly cheated the system
by claiming benefits under dozens of false names.

Investigative reporters were unable to find the woman, but
the damage was done. Americans are generous by
nature but we hate squandering our tax dollars.

Republicans
and Democrats mostly have attacked each other instead of poverty. Today, there’s
a growing consensus that education and jobs must be part of the solution. Two
potential GOP presidential candidates -- Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and Sen. Marco
Rubio, R-Fla., – have begun staking out positions that might actually amount to
something.

Ryan,
the House Budget chairman, believes current welfare programs isolate the poor,
who need to be “reintegrated” into society, although he hasn’t provided
details. He favors vouchers for housing and schools, as he does for Medicare. Rubio
wants to consolidate all federal anti-poverty funding into one agency that
would send the money to the states to run their own poverty programs.

These
ideas have been floated for years as ways to dismantle the welfare state.
Reagan railed against the government’s fostering dependency just as tea party
enthusiasts do now.

Obama
believes that government has an important role in preventing poverty,
especially with early childhood education. But the former community organizer
also knows that improving people’s chances in life requires more than
proclamations from Washington.

“It’s
important that our faith institutions and our businesses and the parents and
the communities themselves are involved in designing and thinking through how
do we move forward,” the president said, adding that it’s crucial that poverty programs
actually work.

“If
they don’t work we should try something else,” he said, acknowledging that
supporters often resist giving up on failed programs.

We
know that doing three simple things practically guarantees that someone won’t
live in poverty: finish high school, get a job and marry before starting a
family. And yet generations of Americans have missed the message.

No
one can be satisfied with the status quo. It is time to consider new approaches
to break the still-obstinate cycle of poverty.

Our
task, as LBJ said five decades ago, is to work together to replace despair with
opportunity.