Shy? Moi? I believe there are more than a few who would laugh at that thought.

I've read your replies and I respect your mind though comes across as arrogant at times though I'm sure that is not the case.

I like to try for confident but I know it can be taken as arrogant too.

Mine is not to upset or be judgemental but to extract the truth. I'm constantly trying to seek the truth. I'm a basic soul that hates ignorance. With the lies and deception of t.v. and the internet I often wonder whether anecdotal data is the only path in the forest of 'knowledge' that entangles the mind and emotion.

Last edited by mothy on Mon Jan 09, 2012 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I like to try for confident but I know it can be taken as arrogant too.

Mine is not to upset or be judgemental but to extract the truth. I'm constantly trying to seek the truth. I'm a basic soul that hates ignorance. With the lies and deception of t.v. and the internet I often wonder whether anecdotal data is the only path in the forest that entangles the mind and emotion.

The truth is elusive and not always absolute in application. Many know the "truth" of their beliefs which are counter to the "truth: of the beliefs of others. I try to stick to the truth of science, which is what we can support with evidence as opposed to the truth of what we believe may be.

_________________With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none” Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."Albert Einstein

I like to try for confident but I know it can be taken as arrogant too.

Mine is not to upset or be judgemental but to extract the truth. I'm constantly trying to seek the truth. I'm a basic soul that hates ignorance. With the lies and deception of t.v. and the internet I often wonder whether anecdotal data is the only path in the forest that entangles the mind and emotion.

The truth is elusive and not always absolute in application. Many know the "truth" of their beliefs which are counter to the "truth: of the beliefs of others. I try to stick to the truth of science, which is what we can support with evidence as opposed to the truth of what we believe may be.

But science is everchanging therefore surely the truth is everchanging? Belief versus fact will always have its discrepancies. Not until science proves God and belief adheres to that 'fact' will never the twain shall meet

The truth lies behind every kitten call. The neigh of the horse. The howl of the wolf. Not for us to divide these but to recognise unity. Mans dominion over animals must be a good one otherwise we fail God.