It must be nice when one can simply dismiss anything that is counter to ones viewpoint as MSM. There are no facts. No truth. Only what one chooses to believe, right?

Facts are facts-opinion articles froma group that consistently supports are not facts-unless backed by exact figures.MSM has beebn screaming trump Russia and now it looks increasingly like Hilalry colluded witht eh Russians-the shameless pigs won't cover and still scream nonsense-a broken clock can still be right twice a day-but is wrong the rest of the time.

Yep--Trump made it so most people do have small gains. But the vast majority of the borrowed money is going to the 1%.

The only problem is if that borrowed money ever gets repaid--then that small gain you got will look miniscule compared to the bill you get.

Please. This like multimillionare nancy Pelosi talking crumbs-you folks are so out of touch. Pelosi You people think the small gains are a joke-keep pushing that line. The billionares always have all kind sof trusts and foundations and such-Clinton got 200 million plus and she didn't pay a cent in taxes-because she calls it a foundation.The tax cut added 1 trillion in ten years and gave all of us working people a break and some rich people a nice break.Obama the treasonous dog raised taxes, destroyed healthcare for middle class and added 10 trillion the deficit-what did anyone egt out of that 10 trillion in debt???

One typically doesn't lie to an investigator unless he/she has something to hide...

That’s not how it works. When the FBI questions a suspect, they already know all the facts. What they are looking for is either the suspect to incriminate himself or state something that disagrees with their list of facts. This could be a wrong date or time or any sort of thing deemed material to the case. Then BLAM! They’ve got the guy cold on “Lying to the FBI” which is a felony.

If you are ever requested to be interviewed by the FBI as anything other than a witness, decline. If you can’t decline, say as little as possible, and use Hilldawg’s favorite line “I do not recall” like you’re at church and that’s a Hail Mary. There is no benefit from talking to them. There is only a near certain conclusion that they will stick you with this ridiculous charge of lying to them.

That’s not how it works. When the FBI questions a suspect, they already know all the facts. What they are looking for is either the suspect to incriminate himself or state something that disagrees with their list of facts. This could be a wrong date or time or any sort of thing deemed material to the case. Then BLAM! They’ve got the guy cold on “Lying to the FBI” which is a felony.

lol--we're not talking about the FBI asking what he had for breakfast 3 months ago. These guys knowingly lied to hide incriminating meetings, evidence, statements that they didn't think the FBI already knew. Unfortunately for them, the investigators did their jobs and proved them to be liars.

lol--we're not talking about the FBI asking what he had for breakfast 3 months ago. These guys knowingly lied to hide incriminating meetings, evidence, statements that they didn't think the FBI already knew. Unfortunately for them, the investigators did their jobs and proved them to be liars.

http://reason.com/archives/2018/02/08/donald-trump-shouldnt-talk-to-the-feds-a“The president is no mere witness. He is at least a subject, and likely a target, of the special counsel's investigation. In federal criminal parlance, a witness is someone not suspected of wrongdoing who has useful information, a subject is someone suspected of wrongdoing who may well be charged if the evidence supports it, and a target is someone whose indictment is actively sought as a purpose of the investigation. When the feds interview a subject or target, their goal is not mere information-gathering or fact-finding or "clearing a few things up." Their goal is the hunt.

In the old westerns, rather than take the trouble of hauling mustachioed miscreants to desultory trials, lawmen would often provoke them into drawing first, thus justifying shooting them down where they stood. A modern federal interview of a subject or target is like that. One purpose, arguably the primary purpose, is to provoke the foolish interviewee into lying, thus committing a new, fresh federal crime that is easily prosecuted, rendering the original investigation irrelevant. Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001, which makes it a felony to lie to the feds, is their shiny quick-draw sidearm. This result not an exception; it is the rule. It happens again and again.

Consider George Papadopoulos. The special counsel secured his guilty plea not for improper contact with the Russians but for lying about that contact to the FBI. Consider Michael Flynn. He too pled guilty not to unlawful contact with Russians but to lying to the FBI about that contact. ”

Consider George Papadopoulos. The special counsel secured his guilty plea not for improper contact with the Russians but for lying about that contact to the FBI. Consider Michael Flynn. He too pled guilty not to unlawful contact with Russians but to lying to the FBI about that contact. ”

Right--and that's because they are co-operating. If no cooperation, then the charges are probably different and more serious.

These guys knowingly lied to hide incriminating meetings, evidence, statements that they didn't think the FBI already knew. Unfortunately for them, the investigators did their jobs and proved them to be liars.

Can you please explain how you know this inside information from Mueller,. I'm curious where the details of these investigations leaked out. I haven't read the details.

Is there any way to have a conversation about Trump without mentioning Hillary? Just wondering.

No, because in our election system, it was basically Hillary the Wonderful Progressive Totally Not A Hint of Corruption vs. Trump. There were two choices, and contrasting with the losing candidate who was the only viable alternative is perfectly reasonable.

I have no love for Trump (did not vote for him, do not like tax cut without corresponding cutting of expenses - where is fiscal responsibility), but this Russian collusion issue is loads of crap. If anyone was colluding with Russian, then it was Clintons who got money from them for their foundation.

One interesting piece of news which is ignored by MSM. I will give a link and then translation, as it can be found only in Russian-language media.

A few more links are available if anyone is interested and/or can read in Russian. There are links in Kurdish but I can not read in that language.

Conspectus: American bombing and shelling killed anywhere between 200 and 600 Russian mercenaries and regular troops near Deir-Ez-Zor on Feb 7, on left bank of Euphrates. Russians tried to attack Kurdish forces, which had embedded American instructors. They called airstrikes and MRLS fire on Russians.

This type of attack has to be sanctioned on the highest level and could not have happened under Obama. To me, it is a pretty good proof that Trump is in no collusion with Russians. He is likely a narcissistic sociopath, but he is no Russian stooge.

No, because in our election system, it was basically Hillary the Wonderful Progressive Totally Not A Hint of Corruption vs. Trump. There were two choices, and contrasting with the losing candidate who was the only viable alternative is perfectly reasonable.

If that's the reasoning, one should at least preface by saying that Trump and his associates are probably guilty and hiding stuff, but so was Hillary.

Can you please explain how you know this inside information from Mueller,. I'm curious where the details of these investigations leaked out. I haven't read the details

Again-let's not make the post about me.

You're claiming some inside knowledge about details of the investigation, that's why I asked you to clarify them. Who else should I ask? Stop being so sensitive or don't make claims that people ask you to verify.

You're claiming some inside knowledge about details of the investigation, that's why I asked you to clarify them. Who else should I ask? Stop being so sensitive or don't make claims that people ask you to verify

Nope--was just stating that the evidence is out there so the statement I responded to is inaccurate. Not inside info at all. The indictment is public.

Let's See, Manafort was busted for some shennanigans about taking money from Ukrainians, whom he had subcontracted to assist via Podesta Group. Manafort's been taking money from foreign groups (just like Clinton related lobbyist groups have) for decades upon decades now. Podesta Group "restated" their own Ukrainian lobbyist money many years after they took it and are now shutting down like the Clinton Foundation.

Flynn was entrapped by not wanting to tell the leak-heavy FBI about his meeting with Russian officials, which was part of his job description as part of an incoming Administration.

However, Flynn may not have been entrapped and may have deliberately caused a 18 USC 1001 charge and immunity for testimony for purposes yet to be revealed. Note that the Mueller-Flynn deal is months old yet and we haven't heard shit, and you bet your ass Mueller would have leaked ("Officials close to the Mueller Investigation") something by now if there was anything to leak.

what was Flynn's position with the Trump campaign? What was he indicted for?

I'm really surprised you need me to answer these for you. The info is readily available. Flynn was "a top adviser and high-profile surrogate to Trump during his campaign, introducing the President-elect at rallies and serving as a top cheerleader on his hyper-active Twitter feed."

"Prosecutors alleged Flynn “did willfully and knowingly make materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements” to FBI agents during a Jan. 24 interview about his conversations with the Russian ambassador. According to the allegations, Flynn falsely told FBI agents that he did not ask Kislyak to delay a vote on a pending United Nations Security Council resolution"

Is it possible to get links from neutral sources that DON'T have severe TDS? Quoting links from the majorly biased, radical, left wing, liberal CNN really totally destroys the narrative, and nothing they publish can be taken as factual, fair and honest regarding any matter with Trump.

This is where Trump really makes his place in illustrated history books as the President that at no time limited himself to fact, fairness and honesty regarding any matter whether in office, in business, in golf, as a TV goblin, or even in marriage.

Most people don't know just how true this statement really is, but it is, and he will assure all that no truer statement has ever been made. In fact apostates who might argue with this can consider themselves unamerican, guilty of treason, and should be confined to their own septic system between brutal beatings.

Trump Derangement SyndromeA condition of hysteria, anger, and fear of Donald Trump as a result of a failure by the afflicted to avail themselves of alternative media sources to combat the misrepresentations and often outright lies of the leftist media.

The Housing Trap
You're being set up to spend your life paying off a debt you don't need to take on, for a house that costs far more than it should. The
conspirators are all around you, smiling to lure you in, carefully choosing their words and watching your reactions as they push your buttons,
anxiously waiting for the moment when you sign the papers that will trap you and guarantee their payoff. Don't be just another victim of the
housing market. Use this book to defend your freedom and defeat their schemes. You can win the game, but first you have to learn how to play
it.115 pages, $12.50