Welcome to Worthy Christian Forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

Boko Haram: West Wakes Up, Media Still Asleep

1votes

Started by
OldSchool2
, May 19 2014 03:46 PM

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.

OldSchool2

Posted 19 May 2014 - 03:46 PM

OldSchool2

Senior Member

Worthy Writers

2,102 posts

from Unity Coaliton for Israel:

"Americans do not really grasp what is going on in Nigeria. Our media are reluctant to publish the word 'Muslim' or 'Islam' when they cover terrorism; they justify or deny the Muslim hatred of Jewish Israel and allow the Muslim persecution of Christians to fly far beneath the radar. In fact, where Muslims are in the numerical 'minority,' as in India, the mainstream media have viewed them as 'persecuted.' No articles appear about the persecution of Hindus in Pakistan or in Kashmir or about the ongoing illegal waves of Muslim Jihadists and criminals into India.

"When Muslims are clearly waging a classic, military holy war (Jihad) against Christians–as Boko Haram is doing in Nigeria–TIME magazine presents it very differently ..."

Posted 04 June 2014 - 07:56 AM

JustinM

Posted 04 June 2014 - 08:09 AM

JustinM

Royal Member

Royal Member

4,775 posts

TIME magazine are giving a very misleading picture. How are people meant to know the truth when there are deceivers all around?

That's a great question. The "journalists" at these newsprint companies are globalists, but they know the world cannot be united as long as it is divided by borders, languages and cultures. So, they lie and cover up this violence if it contradicts their goals of eliminating borders, languages, and cultures.

They have to attack the "soft targets" first, which apparently, at the moment are people that are generally passive and peaceful (Christians), but who also have principles that contradict what is "culturally" permissive in the West.

The islamists are willing to do the dirty work the elitists don't have the stomach for. Once the time has come when the islamists are no longer useful, the elitists will find someone else to do their dirty work for them. Remember the elitists' stated goals.

Anytime you see something that doesn't make sense, ask yourself if this is advancing or restraining globalism.

OakWood

Posted 04 June 2014 - 09:12 AM

OakWood

Royal Member

Royal Member

5,579 posts

TIME magazine are giving a very misleading picture. How are people meant to know the truth when there are deceivers all around?

That's a great question. The "journalists" at these newsprint companies are globalists, but they know the world cannot be united as long as it is divided by borders, languages and cultures. So, they lie and cover up this violence if it contradicts their goals of eliminating borders, languages, and cultures.

They have to attack the "soft targets" first, which apparently, at the moment are people that are generally passive and peaceful (Christians), but who also have principles that contradict what is "culturally" permissive in the West.

The islamists are willing to do the dirty work the elitists don't have the stomach for. Once the time has come when the islamists are no longer useful, the elitists will find someone else to do their dirty work for them. Remember the elitists' stated goals.

Anytime you see something that doesn't make sense, ask yourself if this is advancing or restraining globalism.

The elitists will be in for a shock when they find that Islam does not want to 'play ball'.

The reason that these 'progressive Atheists' give Islam a free pass is because they think they can tame the wild beast, but Islam will turn against them. At the moment Islam sees these people as dhimmis or useful idiots.

Butero

Posted 04 June 2014 - 10:04 AM

Butero

Royal Member

Royal Member

22,252 posts

I think that most of the people here at WB, (at least the more active people), understand the way the news media covers things up and only reports what they want. We also know they slant stories to alter public opinion. Unfortunately, there are many that are being manipulated into believing the cover ups and outright lies.

On the surface, it is hard to understand why liberals defend Islam. Rush Limbaugh thinks it is out of fear, and that people believe we can only be safe through appeasement. I personally think it is based more on liberals hatred for Christians and Jews, and they take up for Muslims who are at war with us. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." So what if they kill innocent people? So what if they treat women like dirt? Who cares when the greater goal is to stomp out Christians and Jews?

Some are awake. Some willfully keep their heads buried in the sand because what is going on is too upsetting for them. Some are truly blind or asleep. If you believe you are getting accurate reporting from the media, you are definitely asleep.

OakWood

Posted 04 June 2014 - 11:18 AM

OakWood

Royal Member

Royal Member

5,579 posts

I think that most of the people here at WB, (at least the more active people), understand the way the news media covers things up and only reports what they want. We also know they slant stories to alter public opinion. Unfortunately, there are many that are being manipulated into believing the cover ups and outright lies.

On the surface, it is hard to understand why liberals defend Islam. Rush Limbaugh thinks it is out of fear, and that people believe we can only be safe through appeasement. I personally think it is based more on liberals hatred for Christians and Jews, and they take up for Muslims who are at war with us. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." So what if they kill innocent people? So what if they treat women like dirt? Who cares when the greater goal is to stomp out Christians and Jews?

Some are awake. Some willfully keep their heads buried in the sand because what is going on is too upsetting for them. Some are truly blind or asleep. If you believe you are getting accurate reporting from the media, you are definitely asleep.

JustinM

Posted 04 June 2014 - 12:56 PM

other one

Posted 04 June 2014 - 08:38 PM

other one

Royal Member

Royal Member

25,883 posts

The elitists will be in for a shock when they find that Islam does not want to 'play ball'.

The reason that these 'progressive Atheists' give Islam a free pass is because they think they can tame the wild beast, but Islam will turn against them. At the moment Islam sees these people as dhimmis or useful idiots.

That isn't what I see them planning or writing about...... they are building them up for a great war. They don't intend on taming them, they intend to destroy them...... and us and Jews at the same time. There isn't enough of them to overpower us all so they are going to get us to do it to ourselves.... and it may well work....

OakWood

Posted 04 June 2014 - 08:48 PM

OakWood

Royal Member

Royal Member

5,579 posts

The elitists will be in for a shock when they find that Islam does not want to 'play ball'.

The reason that these 'progressive Atheists' give Islam a free pass is because they think they can tame the wild beast, but Islam will turn against them. At the moment Islam sees these people as dhimmis or useful idiots.

That isn't what I see them planning or writing about...... they are building them up for a great war. They don't intend on taming them, they intend to destroy them...... and us and Jews at the same time. There isn't enough of them to overpower us all so they are going to get us to do it to ourselves.... and it may well work....

Yes, you're right maybe that is the plans of the elite, but the Liberals, Progressives and all the other fools that follow them are probably ignoring the threat of Islam because they are hoping to secularise it and tame it. They don't realise that it will bite them too. They seem to think that if you appease Muslims they will like you and leave you alone, but hardline Muslims see this as a sign of weakness. They will smile and play 'taqqiya' for the time being, but when they have enough power they will show their teeth and the useful idiots that enabled all this will be the first to get bitten.

OakWood

Posted 04 June 2014 - 09:31 PM

OakWood

Royal Member

Royal Member

5,579 posts

Liberals are just political cannon fodder for people like Kissinger and Rockefeller..... useful idiots to dispose of when you are through with them.

History has proven that it's always the supporters of the new utopia/tyranny who are the first to be lined up against the wall. In the early days of Communism it was always the Leftists who were the first to be disposed of even though they were the ones that had supported and enabled the revolution. They were too dangerous and expected to have their fair share of the pie as a reward for their loyalty. It was easier just to get rid of them, poor deluded fools that they were.

Because they were pro-Communist themselves they expected to be on the select committee but unfortunately for them that didn't happen and they never realised that they had been duped until the bullets entered their heads.

Look what happened under Stalin. Who did he get rid of first? He got rid of his fellow Bolsheviks such as Trotsky. They had outlived their usefulness. The ones who survived Stalin's gruelling regime were the ones who kept their mouths shut and expressed no political opinion, or even sometimes the ones who were against him. They may have been persecuted or imprisoned but many of them outlived him.

Tyrants admire strength and despise weakness. The fawners and the sycophants get killed off pretty quickly unless they have a particular skill that can be harnessed.

JustinM

Posted 06 June 2014 - 10:23 AM

JustinM

Royal Member

Royal Member

4,775 posts

I believe the reason they are the first to be killed off, is because tyrants cannot abide disloyalty. The were disloyal to their countrymen and committed treason against their nation and cannot be trusted. They are a liability, and a risk that despots cannot tolerate.