(An edited version of this essay
first appeared in the December, 1996 issue of Instauration)

A scale which quantifies the effects of intermixture between the
Northern European or Nordish race and other races, and thus the
relative assimilability of other races by the Nordish race,
provides a useful tool for Nordish racial preservationists. This
scale is designed to help Nordish preservationists predict the
results of intermixture in much the same manner as the periodic
table of the elements helps scientists understand chemical
reactions. It enables us to calculate the effect on the Nordish
race of intermixture with different races, and thus the ability of
a Nordish population to assimilate other racial elements. Also,
expressing the requirements for Nordish racial preservation in
quantitative terms creates an objective standard by which the
preservationist effectiveness of different proposals for racial
separation can be measured, compared and judged. The larger the
numbers involved the more accurate the predicted result or effect
will be. The results for individual cases or small samples of
intermixture will vary more broadly, but the result for a larger
number, especially an entire population, can be predicted with a
high degree of accuracy. When the consequences of racial
intermixture are quantified, or graphically displayed on a scale
or chart, they become clearer, more obvious and easier for many
people to understand. There is an inflexibility or absoluteness
about numbers that makes them more difficult to evade or deny.

Every scale must have a point of reference, from which the
measurement is made. For this scale, which indicates the
assimilability of different racial types with the Nordish type,
and the effects of their intermixture upon the Nordish type, the
point or standard of reference is the Nordish race, and
specifically its central and most distinct types. Other races
would have entirely different scales of assimilability, with
themselves as the point or standard of reference, i.e., the
beginning numbers. For example, on a scale based on the Japanese
people, the indigenous Japanese population would number perhaps
0-4, the Nordish racial types would likely measure in the 30s or
40s, or the mid-range numbers, and the West Africans would again
be the highest numbers.

This scale begins with the most distinct Northern European or
Nordish types, the Central Nordish types (Nordic, Fälish, Trønder,
Brünn and Borreby) indigenous to northern Europe, ranging in
distinctiveness from "0" to "4," with the most distinctly Nordish
as "0" and the least as "4," and proceeds through the Peripheral
Nordish types (Atlantid, East Baltic, Neo-Danubian, Sub-Nordic)
who range from "3" to "6" in Nordish distinctiveness, through the
various non-Nordish European types, to the various non-European
Caucasian types, to the various non-Caucasian racial types. (See The Nordish Race for a more detailed
description of the Nordish types)

This progression of assimilability (or unassimilability)
coincides fairly closely, as one might expect, with the degree of
racial or genetic distance of the various races from the Nordish
race. If two or more different races are grouped closely together
it is not an indication that they are racially closely related or
similar, but only that they share a similar degree of
assimilability with -- or racial distance from -- the Central
Nordish racial types. Similarly, if two individuals share the same
racial rating on this scale it does not indicate that they are
necessarily of the same racial type, ancestry or group, only that
they share the same degree of assimilability with -- or racial
distance from -- the Nordish race.

The Mediterranid group ranges from 9-16 with the more "gracile"
types being more assimilable for a Nordish population and the
other types being less assimilable.

The Orientalid racial group consists of the "Arab" or "Semitic"
populations of such countries as Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Saudi
Arabia.

The Turanid group is the predominant element in Kazakhstan and is
also common in Turkey.

The Indic group is the predominant racial type in Pakistan and
northern India. The Dravidic group is the predominant racial
element in the remainder of India.

The black population in the Americas is of the Palaecongoid and
Sudanid subraces of West Africa. (See The Races of Humanity for a more
detailed description of the non-Nordish races) Blood group studies
have indicated that the U.S. black population is about 25% "white"
in its genetic composition as a consequence of past intermixture.
Assuming the racial average of the "white" element was a "4," this
would place the U.S. black average at about "64" on this scale.

The dividing line between "white" and "nonwhite" is not as clear
as it once was. In the United States before 1880 -- before the
"new immigration" (1890-1924) added a large Mediterranid and
Armenid element -- the population consisted almost exclusively of
Northern Europeans and West Africans, and the racial designations
of "white" and "black" referred to these two groups. For all
practical purposes, and in popular usage, "white" was synonymous
with Northern European. With the increase in the number of
intermediate types there has been an expansion or inflation in the
definition of "white" in its common usage to include a much
broader range of racial types, many of which are quite racially
distant from, and genetically incompatible with, the Nordish race.
In current popular usage the dividing line on this scale between
white and nonwhite would probably be in the 18-20 range. As a
result, for purposes of Nordish racial preservationism the racial
category of "white" is now clearly inadequate, since so many of
those included in this category are far removed beyond what the
Nordish race is capable of assimilating without losing its own
racial identity. As presently defined the "white" race is not
really a race, if a race is defined as a population that shares
both a common biological ancestry and essentially similar,
mutually compatible genetic traits which are not diminished or
lost by within-group reproduction.

Racially mixed populations and individuals can range greatly over
this scale. The racial average of mixed populations can be fairly
accurately calculated based on their ancestral racial components,
but the racial rating of mixed-race individuals can vary widely,
although an average can be calculated. For example, one would
expect the average racial rating of a quadroon (a person
one-quarter black, with one black and three white grandparents) on
this scale to be about "23" if the white grandparents had a racial
average of "3" and the black grandparent were an unmixed West
African rated at "83" (3+3+3+83 = 92. 92÷4 = 23). This would be
outside the "white" racial range (see above). But Carleton Coon
cites C. Stern to the effect that about 25% of quadroons can
"pass" as "white." Given a quadroon racial average of "23" it can
be expected that some would be rated in the 16-20 range, and able
to pass as "white" when the "white" population extends to that
range. In the U.S. before 1880, when the "white" racial range,
with few exceptions, rarely extended beyond "9," it would have
been much less common for a quadroon to "pass" as "white," and
even octoroons (persons one-eighth black, with one black and seven
white great-grandparents), with a racial average of "13," would
have had difficulty doing so, as evidenced by the octoroon
children of the quadroon Sally Hemings, alleged to have been
fathered either by Thomas Jefferson or his nephew. Of course, if
the single black grandparent of a quadroon was in fact part white,
and rated at the modern U.S. black average of "64" on this scale,
then the grandchild would be expected to rate near "18" (3+3+3+64
= 73. 73÷4 = 18.25).

In the United States blacks who rate above "40" on this scale
(which would include most blacks who are half white in their
genetic endowment) are generally perceived as simply black. Only
when they rate below "40" is there a general perception that they
are part white.

For purposes of reference, Colin Powell would rate about "35" on
this scale. The late entertainer Sammy Davis, Jr. rated about
"45," while his children by Swedish actress Mai Britt -- who rates
at the most distinct Nordish level as a "1" -- rate as predicted
by this scale in the 21-25 range. O.J. Simpson would rate about
"55," while his children by his late wife Nicole, who rated about
"4," would be expected to rate in the 29-30 range.

Given the laws of chance that govern genetic combinations in
racial intermixture, individual exceptions to the rule are common.
But as a rule mixed-race individuals conform closely to the
results one would predict from this scale. For example, Nancy
Kwan, an attractive "Chinese" actress of the 1950s and 1960s, was
actually Eurasian, half Scottish (Nordish) and half Chinese
(Northeast Asian), and rated about 23 on this scale, as one would
predict. But Occidental movie-goers wrongly perceived her as a
representative of pure Chinese womanhood, rather than the result
of an equal European-Chinese mixture.

Some population groups are not racial groups, and consist of a
mixture of individuals spread over a fairly broad racial range.
Such groups, of racially mixed composition, are not defined in
specifically racial terms and can only be placed on this scale in
general terms. Such is the case with the Hispanic group. The
Hispanic category covers almost the total racial range of this
scale, but the great majority of the U.S. Hispanic population
consists of Latin American Amerindians and Mestizos -- persons of
mixed Amerindian and white (usually Mediterranid) ancestry. Even
this more specific group, being still racially mixed, covers a
broad racial range, from about "20" to "45." For purposes of
calculation I place their average at "30."

Sample calculations using this scale to predict the effects of
intermixture:

If the indigenous Nordish population of Sweden, which is rated at
an average of "2" on this scale (see below) were to assimilate a
West African element that was 1% of its own size -- which it
outnumbered 100 to 1 -- its average would shift to 2.8, a very
substantial racial change from being the most distinct of Nordish
populations to being of only about average Central Nordish
distinctiveness. A similar racial result would occur in the
intermixture of a population that was 92% Swedish and 8%
Mediterranid, with the average Mediterranid rating "12" on this
scale, calculated as follows: 92% at "2" = 184 and 8% at "12" =
96. Add 184 + 96 = 280. Divide this by 100 and the resulting
racial average is 2.8.

If the Swedish population assimilated a West African element that
was 5% of the population, with the average West African rating
"83," its racial average would change to 6, calculated as follows:
95% at "2" = 190 and 5% at "83" = 415. Add 190 + 415 = 605. Divide
this by 100 and the resulting racial average is 6.05, a radical
racial shift from being the most distinctively Nordish people to
being borderline non-Nordish. A similar racial shift would occur
in the intermixture of a population that was 60% Swedish and 40%
Mediterranid, calculated as follows: 60% at "2" = 120 and 40% at
"12" = 480. Add 120 + 480 = 600. Divide this by 100 and the
resulting racial average is 6.

To take this sample series further, the mixture of a population
that was 90% Swedish and 10% West African would result in a racial
average of 10.1, calculated as follows: 90% at "2" = 180 and 10%
at "83" = 830. Add 180 + 830 = 1,010. Divide this by 100 and the
resulting racial average is 10.1. A similar racial average would
result from the mixture of a population that was 20% Swedish and
80% Mediterranid, calculated as follows: 20% at "2" = 40 and 80%
at "12" = 960. Add 40 + 960 = 1,000. Divide this by 100 and the
resulting racial average is 10.

As should be evident from the above sample calculations, this
scale teaches an important lesson -- for every degree of
assimilation, however small it might seem, there are costs to be
paid that are harmful to the preservation of the Nordish race and,
if sufficiently large, actually destructive of the Nordish race.
There is no getting around the numbers. They are inflexible and
cannot be honestly evaded or denied.

The value of this scale to racial preservationists derives from
the fact that when a population is composed of different racial
elements it must be assumed that over time these elements will
intermix or blend together, and the resulting mixed population
will tend to increasingly cluster toward the mean, acquiring a
growing uniformity around the racial average. In short, the racial
average of a population is its racial destiny, its eventual racial
future, predicting what the actual predominant racial type of the
population will be after the process of intermixture has been
completed. But due to global immigration patterns the racial
average in many populations is not stable. This is especially true
of many historically Nordish or part-Nordish populations, where
immigration is causing them to shift ever further away from their
indigenous racial average.

Scandinavia: As is universally recognized, the most
distinctly Nordish populations are in Scandinavia. The totally
Central Nordish indigenous population of Sweden, for example,
would average about a "2" on this scale, calculated as follows:
15% of the population are "0s" = 0; 20% of the population are "1s"
= 20; 30% are "2s" = 60; 20% are "3s" = 60; and 15% are "4s" = 60.
Add these numbers together (0+20+60+60+60 = 200) and divide by 100
(for 100%) and the average is "2." The indigenous populations of
Norway and Denmark would average about "2.2," with 10% "0s," 20%
"1s," 30% "2s," 20% "3s" and 20% "4s." [SeeThe Nordish Racefor the racial composition of
indigenous European populations]

When one takes into account the recent (post-1970) non-Nordish
immigration into Scandinavia, and especially the racial
composition of births, then the racial average of the population
as of 1996 changes dramatically. For example, about 10% of the
births in Sweden are to immigrants. If we assume that the
assimilability of these immigrant newborns averages "40" (i.e.,
assuming there are about twice as many Caucasians among the
immigrants than black Africans, while the remainder are Asian),
then the racial composition of births in Sweden would be
calculated as follows: 90% are "2s" (the indigenous Swedish
births) = 180 and 10% are "40s" = 400. Add 180 + 400 = 580. Divide
this by 100 and the racial average of Swedish births is currently
about 5.8, a dramatic change from the indigenous population which
has historically defined Nordish racial distinctiveness. The late
physical anthropologist Carleton Coon called Sweden a refuge area
for the classic Nordic racial type. This refuge area is now
clearly endangered, as a "5.8" racial average is far removed from
the classic Nordic type.

Britain: The Central Nordish element in the British
population, not so distinctly Nordish on average as the
Scandinavians, would average about a "3" on this scale, calculated
as follows: 10% are "1s" = 10; 20% are "2s" = 40; 30% are "3s" =
90; and 40% are "4s" = 160. Add these numbers together
(10+40+90+160 = 300) and divide by 100 and the average is "3." The
average of the indigenous British Peripheral Nordish element would
be about "5," calculated as follows: 10% are "3s" = 30; 20% are
"4s" = 80; 30% are "5s" = 150; and 40% are "6s" = 240. Add these
numbers together (30+80+150+240 = 500) and divide by 100 and the
average is "5." The indigenous population of Britain as a whole
would average about 3.66, calculated as follows: 67% are "3s" (the
Central Nordish elements) = 201 and 33% are "5s" (the Peripheral
Nordish elements) = 165. Add 201 + 165 = 366. Divide this by 100
and the average degree of Nordish distinctiveness of the
indigenous British population is 3.66.

This again changes dramatically when the post-1955 non-Nordish
immigrants into Britain and their descendants are considered, most
noticeably in births, which together with immigration rates
determine the racial composition of the future population. The
non-indigenous elements are currently about 9% of the population.
Assigning them an average assimilability rating of "50" (as the
black proportion is larger than in Scandinavia) the present racial
composition of Britain would be calculated as follows: 91% are
"3.66s" (the average of the indigenous British element) = 333.06
and 9% are "50s" = 450. Add 333 + 450 = 783. Divide this by 100
and the British racial average is now about 7.83. Britain, which
has been an exclusively and distinctly Nordish country since
prehistoric times, now has a non-Nordish racial average. The
racial average of the birthrate indicates that Britain will be
even further removed from the Nordish type in the future. The
non-indigenous elements account for about 14% of births, so the
racial composition of births in Britain would be calculated as
follows: 86% are "3.66s" (the average of the indigenous British
births) = 314.76 and 14% are "50s" = 700. Add 315 + 700 = 1,015.
Divide this by 100 and the racial average of British births is now
about 10.15, which is about the same as Italy's.

Select groups within a population can vary substantially from the
racial average of a population as a whole. In 1974 I visited the
British aircraft carrier H.M.S. Hermes while it was serving as a
Commando carrier (and while Prince Charles was assigned to it as a
helicopter pilot). On board were a Royal Marine Commando of about
700 men, a battery of Royal Artillery of about 90 men, and a
ship's company of about 1,000 Royal Navy officers and seamen. I
was struck by the marked racial difference between the Royal
Marines and the sailors, even when the clearly non-indigenous
sailors were excluded. The Royal Marines were not only splendid
examples of manhood, but on average much more distinctly Nordish
than the sailors. On this scale I would place the Royal Marine
racial average at "2.5," while the sailors would rate about "4."
Obviously, some type of strong selection process was involved with
these elite personnel beyond the expected one of physical
conditioning. Similarly, when I visited the Norway pavilion at
Epcot in May, 1988, just prior to its grand opening by the
Norwegian Royal Family, I was impressed by the very high degree of
Nordish racial distinctiveness of the young Norwegians staffing
the pavilion at that time. Having visited Norway, I rate the
Norwegian population as a whole at about "2.2" on this scale, but
the very select group at the pavilion rated about "1.4." On
subsequent visits to the pavilion I have found the staff to be
more representative of the Norwegian population as a whole, a
still very distinctly Nordish "2.2." It might also be noted that
groups that are voluntary associations are often very selective,
confirming the old adage that "Birds of a feather flock together,"
and can differ dramatically from the racial average of a
population as a whole.

Germany: The racial distinctiveness of the Nordish
population of Germany can be calculated as follows: 75% are "3s"
(the average of the Central Nordish elements) = 225, and 25% are
"5s" (the average of the Peripheral Nordish elements) = 125. Add
225 + 125 = 350. Divide this by 100 and the average degree of
distinctiveness of the German Nordish population is 3.5. The
racial average of the indigenous population of Germany as a whole
would be calculated thus: 80% are "3.5s" (the Nordish elements) =
280 and 20% are "7.5s" (the average of the Alpine-Dinaric
elements) = 150. Add 280 + 150 = 430. Divide this by 100 and the
racial average of the entire indigenous German population is 4.3.
When non-indigenous immigrant elements -- currently about 9% of
the population -- are included, the racial average of the German
population shifts as follows: 91% are "4.3s" (the average of the
indigenous German element) = 391.3 and 9% are "30s" (the average
of the immigrant element, which is mainly Turkish and Orientalid)
= 270. Add 391 + 270 = 661. Divide this by 100 and the German
racial average is now about 6.61, which is outside the Nordish
range. As the immigrant element accounts for about 15% of births
the racial average of births in Germany is currently about 8.15.

France: The distinctiveness of the Nordish population of
France can be calculated as follows: 14% are "3s" (the average of
the Central Nordish elements) = 42, and 86% are "5s" (the average
of the Peripheral Nordish elements) = 430. Add 42 + 430 = 472.
Divide this by 100 and the average degree of distinctiveness of
the French Nordish population is 4.72, which is outside the
Central Nordish range. The racial average of the indigenous
population of France as a whole would be calculated thus: 35% are
"4.72s" (the Nordish elements) = 165.2 and 65% are "8.5s" (the
average of the Alpine-Dinaric-Mediterranid elements) = 552.5. Add
165.2 + 552.5 = 717.7. Divide this by 100 and the racial average
of the entire indigenous French population is 7.18. When
non-indigenous immigrant elements -- currently about 9% of the
population -- are included, the racial average of the French
population shifts as follows: 91% are "7.18s" (the average of the
indigenous French element) = 653.38 and 9% are "50s" (the average
of the immigrant element, which has a large proportion of black
Africans) = 450. Add 653.4 + 450 = 1,103. Divide this by 100 and
the racial average of the French population as a whole is now
about 11. The immigrant elements account for about 14% of births,
so the racial average of births in France is now about 13.17.

Individuals in the 1-2 range are very rare among the indigenous
French population. Actresses Emmanuelle Beart and Julie Delpy
would rate about "3" on this scale, while Catherine Deneuve,
Leslie Caron and Brigitte Bardot would rate in the 4-6 range.
While Mlle. Bardot, now of the elder generation, has supported the
movement to preserve the French people by restricting and
repatriating racially incompatible immigrants, Mlle. Beart, of the
younger generation, has gained notoriety for her support of
immigrant interests.

Italy: The position of the Italian population on this
scale can be calculated as follows: 5% are "4.5s" (the average of
the Nordish elements) = 22.5; 35% are "8s" (the average of the
Alpine-Dinaric elements) = 280; and 60% are "12s" (the average of
the Mediterranid elements) = 720. Add 22.5 + 280 + 720 = 1,022.5.
Divide this by 100 and the racial average of the indigenous
Italian population is 10.22.

In general, in recent years there has been a tendency among
European countries to adopt more restrictive immigration policies,
but racial preservationists should not draw too much comfort from
this, for three reasons. First, this tendency has been more a
response to high unemployment and other adverse economic factors
than to any explicit racial preservationist sentiment. No doubt
such sentiment exists and is a factor, but the
anti-preservationist ideology of racial nihilism is still
overwhelmingly dominant, and unless it is replaced by a new
preservationist paradigm the immigrant influx into Europe, and its
racially destructive consequences, can be expected to eventually
return to, and even exceed, its previous levels. Second, the level
of immigration into western Europe is still high, exceeding two
million per year. Third, the immigrant elements currently present
in the countries of northwestern Europe are already too large to
be assimilated by the indigenous populations without effectively
destroying their existing and historical racial identity. Only
their removal from Europe -- preferably by their repatriation to
their own countries of origin, their own racial homelands -- can
prevent the destruction of the indigenous European populations.

When racially incompatible immigrants settle in a European
country they change its racial average, and thereby its racial
destiny or future. Immigrants (and the political, economic and
cultural leadership that promotes or permits their entry) have
dramatically changed the racial average of such Nordish countries
as Britain and Sweden, thereby also changing the racial destiny of
these countries from a Nordish future to a non-Nordish future,
from a destiny that continued and preserved their indigenous
Nordish populations to a destiny in which their indigenous
populations are transformed and replaced by non-Nordish
populations -- a racially non-British Britain and non-Swedish
Sweden -- although the transformed populations might still
identify themselves nationally as British and Swedish. A
restoration of the indigenous racial average, restoring a Britain
for the British and a Sweden for the Swedes, is required for the
continuation and preservation, the future existence and destiny,
of the indigenous British, Swedish and other Nordish peoples.

United States: The racial distinctiveness of the Nordish
population of the United States can be calculated as follows: 65%
are "3s" (the average of the Central Nordish elements) = 195, and
35% are "5s" (the average of the Peripheral Nordish elements) =
175. Add 195 + 175 = 370. Divide this by 100 and the average
degree of distinctiveness of the U.S. Nordish population is 3.7.
In his 1965 work The Living Races of Man Carleton Coon
cites Glass and Li to the effect that the proportion of black
genes in the American "white" population is negligible. Nearly all
the gene flow between races from the intermixture of the last
several centuries has been from the European races into the
non-European races, and very little of the reverse has so far
occurred (at least as of 1965). But there has been some
assimilation of Alpine and Mediterranid genes by the American
Nordish population, and this has caused their racial average to
shift, reflecting a lessened degree of Nordish racial
distinctiveness.

The racial average of the U.S. population as a whole on this
scale (as of 1996) would be calculated thus: 57% are "3.7s" (the
Nordish elements) = 210.9; 8% are "8s" (the average of the
Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan elements) = 64; 9% are "14s" (the average
of the Mediterranid-Armenid-Orientalid elements) = 126; 9% are
"30s" (the average of the Hispanic Amerindian-Mestizo elements) =
270; 13% are "64s" (the average of the black element) = 832; and
4% are "41s" (the average of the Asian and Amerindian elements) =
164. Add 211 + 64 + 126 + 270 + 832 + 164 = 1,667. Divide this by
100 and the racial average of the entire U.S. population is 16.67.

In this context it is interesting to note the new "Betty Crocker"
brand symbol of General Mills. One advertisement highlights a
picture of the new Betty with the phrase, "We look a lot like
you." The previous or old Betty, in her many guises over a 70 year
period, was always distinctly Northern European, rating in the 2-4
range on this scale. The new Betty, her replacement, is definitely
not Northern European, although she looks like she could still be
considered as borderline "white" according to the current common
usage of the term. She looks, in fact, like a person who would be
rated very near the current U.S. racial average of 16.67, a
"multiracial, multiethnic composite" of what the typical American
would look like after the diverse racial elements in the current
population had been intermixed or blended together. [Betty_Crocker.jpg]

The new Betty would certainly not have been perceived as
typically American by an earlier generation, but with the racial
shift since 1970 -- especially the marked increase in intermediate
racial types -- the perception of what is typically American is
also shifting. The old Betty Crocker symbolized the blending or
mixing of bakery ingredients. The new Betty Crocker symbolizes the
blending or mixing of races. The racial average of a population is
its racial destiny, the racial future. The new Betty Crocker is a
symbol of our intended future. The racial destiny of the American
population is to be "Betty Crockerized," its ingredients blended
together toward the racial average, and cooked in the racial
meltdown of the "melting pot."

Of course, the racial average of the U.S. population since 1970
has been in a state of continual transformation due to high levels
of non-Nordish immigration and differential birthrates, so the
1996 racial average of 16.67 -- itself much higher than the 1970
average of 13.13, which had changed relatively little from the
1880 average of 12.68 [Note 1] -- is continually rising, or shifting
ever further away from the Nordish racial range.

The racial average of current U.S. births clearly shows this
continuing shift, and would be calculated as follows: 48% are
"3.7s" (the Nordish elements) = 177.6; 8% are "8s" (the average of
the Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan elements) = 64; 9% are "14s" (the
average of the Mediterranid-Armenid-Orientalid elements) = 126;
14% are "30s" (the average of the Hispanic Amerindian-Mestizo
elements) = 420; 16% are "64s" (the average of the black element)
= 1,024; and 5% are "41s" (the average of the Asian and Amerindian
elements) = 205. Add 177.6 + 64 + 126 + 420 + 1,024 + 205 =
2,016.6. Divide this by 100 and the current (1996) racial average
of U.S. births is 20.17, or outside the "white" racial range.

Projections for the U.S. population in the year 2050, combining
the effects of both projected immigration rates and differential
birthrates, result in a racial average that shows this shift even
more clearly, calculated as follows: 37% would be "3.7s" (the
Nordish elements) = 136.9; 6% would be "8s" (the
Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan elements) = 48; 10% would be "14s" (the
Mediterranid-Armenid-Orientalid elements) = 140; 21% would be
"30s" (the Hispanic Amerindian-Mestizo elements) = 630; 16% would
be "64s" (the black element) = 1,024; and 11% would be "41s" (the
Asian and Amerindian elements) = 451. Add 136.9 + 48 + 140 + 630 +
1,024 + 451 = 2,429.9. Divide this by 100 and the racial average
of the entire U.S. population in 2050 would be 24.3, an 80%
increase from 1996 in the distance of the racial average from the
Nordish range.

The racial average of projected births in the U.S. in 2050 shows
the racial change still more dramatically, calculated as follows:
27% would be "3.7s" (the Nordish elements) = 99.9; 4% would be
"8s" (the Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan elements) = 32; 9% would be "14s"
(the Mediterranid-Armenid-Orientalid elements) = 126; 26% would be
"30s" (the Hispanic Amerindian-Mestizo elements) = 780; 21% would
be "64s" (the black element) = 1,344; and 11% would be "41s" (the
Asian and Amerindian elements) = 451. Add 99.9 + 32 + 126 + 780 +
1,344 + 451 = 2,832.9. Divide this by 100 and the racial average
of U.S. births in 2050 would be 28.33. This is near the current
racial average of the population of Mexico.

This racial average, or one shifting continually higher or
further away from the Nordish range, will eventually be our racial
destiny, our racial future, the fate of our race, unless measures
are taken to prevent it. If we want a different racial future we
must change the racial average to give us the racial future we
want. If we want our racial future to be Nordish, to preserve the
racial identity of our past and present generations, we must
partition the country into separate racial nations, including a
Nordish nation with a population whose racial average is within
the Nordish range.

The racial average of a separate "white" nation which included
the entire U.S. "white" population (basically all persons in the
1-19 range on this scale) would be calculated as follows: 77%
would be "3.7s" (the Nordish elements) = 284.9; 11% would be "8s"
(the Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan elements) = 88; and 12% would be "14s"
(the Mediterranid-Armenid-Orientalid elements) = 168. Add 285 + 88
+ 168 = 541. Divide this by 100 and the racial average of the
population in the separate "white" nation would be 5.41. This
would be a racial average just barely within the Nordish racial
range and well outside the Central Nordish range, similar to the
racial average of Poland (5.6) or Austria (5.95). With an average
this far removed from the more distinct part of the Nordish racial
range it is unlikely that the most distinct Nordish elements in
the 0-2 range would be fully preserved in the long-term. Certainly
they would become very rare. (In 1880 the racial average of the
U.S. "white" population was a distinctly Nordish 3.69. In 1970 it
was about 5.16. [Note 2] The shift occurred mainly during the
"New Immigration" of 1890-1924, which was ended by the passage of
the National Origins Act in the latter year. The racial average of
immigration into the U.S. before 1880 -- excluding African slaves
-- was a distinctly Nordish 3.72. During the New Immigration from
1890-1924 it was about 8.5. Since 1970 it has been about 35.)

To fully preserve the most distinct Nordish elements a racial
average closer to the center of the Nordish racial range is
required. Toward this end I have proposed a preservationist plan
for partition [see The
Preservationist Alternative] which would divide the "white"
elements of the U.S. population into two separate racial nations.
The population in the separate Nordish nation would consist of
those persons in the 0-10 range on this scale. This would include
the Nordish, Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan and gracile Mediterranid
elements, but exclude the other "white" elements in the 11 and
over range, who would have their own separate nation. The racial
average of the separate Nordish nation in my proposal would be
calculated as follows: 83.4% would be "3.7s" (the Nordish
elements) = 308.58; 12.6% would be "8s" (the
Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan elements) = 100.8; and 4% would be "9.5s"
(the average of the gracile Mediterranid elements) = 38. Add
308.58 + 100.8 + 38 = 447.38. Divide this by 100 and the racial
average of the population would be 4.47, well within the Nordish
racial range as a whole, although just outside the Central Nordish
range. This would be a racial average which could preserve the
full range of the Nordish race, including the elements in the very
distinct 0-2 range.

For racial preservationists in general, and Nordish
preservationists is particular, this is the racial average that
should be our goal, the one we should be moving toward, the one
that will preserve the Nordish race.

Notes

1.The racial average
of the 1970 U.S. population as a whole on this scale would be
calculated thus: 66.5% were "3.7s" (the Nordish elements) =
246; 9.4% were "8s" (the average of the Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan
elements) = 75.2; 8% were "14s" (the average of the
Mediterranid-Armenid-Orientalid elements) = 112; 3.2% were
"30s" (the average of the Hispanic Amerindian-Mestizo
elements) = 96; 11.1% were "64s" (the average of the black
element) = 710.4; and 1.8% were "41s" (the average of the
Asian and Amerindian elements) = 73.8. Add 246 + 75.2 + 112 +
96 + 710.4 + 73.8 = 1,313. Divide this by 100 and the racial
average of the entire U.S. population in 1970 was 13.13.

The racial average of the 1880 U.S. population
as a whole on this scale would be calculated thus: 83.5% were
"3.5s" (the Nordish elements) = 292.25; 2.6% were "8s" (the
average of the Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan elements) = 20.8; .4%
were "14s" (the average of the Mediterranid-Armenid-Orientalid
elements) = 5.6; .6% were "30s" (the average of the Hispanic
Amerindian-Mestizo elements) = 18; 12% were "70s" (the average
of the black element) = 840; and .9% were "41s" (the average
of the Asian and Amerindian elements) = 36.9. Add 292.25 +
75.2 + 5.6 + 18 + 840 + 36.9 = 1,267.95. Divide this by 100
and the racial average of the entire U.S. population in 1880
was 12.68. The Nordish elements are given an average of 3.5
for 1880 as the large Peripheral Nordish element of the New
Immigration (1890-1924) had not yet arrived and there had been
relatively less assimilation of Alpine and Mediterranid
elements. The black elements are given an average of 70 as the
added infusion of white genes from the 1880-1960 period had
not yet occurred.

2. The racial average of
the "white" population of the U.S. in 1880 would be calculated
thus: 96.5% were "3.5s" (the Nordish elements) = 337.75; 3%
were "8s" (the average of the Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan elements)
= 24; .5% were "14s" (the average of the
Mediterranid-Armenid-Orientalid elements) = 7. Add 337.75 + 24
+ 7 = 368.75. Divide this by 100 and the U.S. "white" racial
average in 1880 was 3.69.

The U.S. "white" racial average in 1970 would
be calculated as follows: 79.3% were "3.7s" (the Nordish
elements) = 293.41; 11.2% were "8s" (the average of the
Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan elements) = 89.6; 9.5% were "14s" (the
average of the Mediterranid-Armenid-Orientalid elements) =
133. Add 293.41 + 89.6 + 133 = 516.01. Divide this by 100 and
the U.S. "white" racial average in 1970 was 5.16.