Law Essay Media Rights 2015

Many years ago the term “privacy” had little meaning to many people and especially in many court environments. Since this time, the world has established rules and regulations including privacy rights which act to serve and defend all human beings under the Charter Rights. The Canadian Justice system imposes protection and privacy for citizens dealing with the law. This essay will explore how the role of the court and the public play in the judgement between balancing privacy and freedom of expression. It will take a further look at the history, landmark cases, controversies, social beliefs, and trends of an individuals privacy versus the media. The media infringes on individual rights through issues such as publication bans, freedom of the press, and rights of the accused to a fair trial.

A public ban can be defined as “a tool available to a court intended to protect the identity of complaints and witnesses in court proceedings from being published in print or being broadcast on televesion, film, or radio” (CRCVC, 2011). According to author Kirk Tousav, “judges have long acknowledges the media’s crucial role as a public watchdog” (Canadian Judicial Council, 2007). In 1983 the Ontario Court of Appeal announced that “public accessibility to the courts is a restraint on arbitrary action by those who govern and by the powerful.” However, the media does not have an unlimited right to broadcast all information related to a judicial proceeding in all cases (Canadian Judicial Council, 2007). There are two key competing objectives – the protection of privacy and the constitutional right of all criminal defendants to undergo a fair trial, free of media reports revealing criminal record, inadmissible evidence, or other information that could influence a jury and prejudice a case. (Canadian Judicial Council, 2007).

Freedom of the press means the right to circulate opinions in print without censorship by the government. With the media’s thirst to report a good news story, and a victims or accuser’s need for privacy, there is an ongoing battle of how much can be published of trials. The Charter declares in section 2(b) that “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication” are fundamental to Canadian society (English, 2012). In this regard The Charter, has had a profound impact on how judges exercise their inherent powers to restrict media coverage. Although publication bans preserve the privacy of the court, journalists are finding that there are too many obstacles that keep them from reporting. An article written by Kathy English in The Star explains that In Canada, judges still impose too many publication bans that stop journalists from reporting on public court proceedings; bureaucrats routinely block requests for public information; control-mad governments shut down access and politicians refuse to speak to journalists, who seek to hold them to account on the public’s behalf (English, 2012). Even though the media is given rights to publicize stories, in some cases publication bans prevent them from doing their job.

The Right to a Fair Trial means that people can be sure that processes will be fair and certain. It prevents governments from abusing their powers. A Fair Trial is the best means of separating the guilty from the innocent and protecting against injustice. When the media reports on the judicial process, freedoms collide. An accused’s right to a fair trial and the media’s right to freedom of expression are in frequent tension. The principle agents of these rights, the media and the judiciary are interdependent of constitutional rights, often in conflict as to where the priority and emphases should be placed in the free press versus a fair trial (Kelly, 2002). The common law recognizes the right of an…

Related Documents: Law Essay Media Rights 2015

Preliminary Legal Studies
The Individual and Technology
Assessment Task No 2 In class essay | Date Handed Out:6/5/13 | Due Date: 23/5/12 | Weighting: 25% | Total Marks:20 |
PREPARATION & SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS |
Research and general preparation are to be completed in the lead-up to the in-class essay on 23rd May. This will include research time during normal classes. That is, THREE periods will be allocated for preparation, with ONE…

Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
The law of Habeas Corpus was established to allow the guilty to present their case in court and to be tried fairly. In today's war on terror, the number of such enemy combatants who were detained indefinitely without any trial has increased. The courts are split up on following the law by the letter or to practically alter it according to the situation's needs. I feel it's necessary to follow these laws in same context in which they were written, and the pragmatic…

1) Appeals laws precedent set by SA
22 Mar 2013, 11:10 am - Source: Karen Ashford, SBS
The most significant changes to Australia's criminal appeal laws in a century have been passed in South Australia, setting a precedent for reform which could flow all the way to the High Court. South Australia has passed reforms to allow prisoners a second chance to appeal their convictions in the case of compelling new evidence. Until now, people convicted of an offence have had a single right of appeal…

judges to try and uphold the law and protect civil liberties. The Rule of Law as defined by Dicey states that ‘No man is punishable except for a breach of the law’ and it is judges that try and uphold the law and make sure no one is falsely imprisoned. Also the UK has a common law system were many legal principles are derived from decisions made my judges. Therefore, decisions of judges and the way in which judges interpret the law can have major impacts on constitutional rights.
Ever since the 2005…

Strap in, folks—because we’re about to talk copyright law. I’m aware that as soon as I
string the words “copyright” and “law” together, eyes start to glaze over. I get it.
Copyright law isn’t Kim-Kardashian’s-oiled-butt level stuff; it doesn’t break the internet.
But important things hardly ever do. Believe it or not, copyright law is shaping up to be
the next big battleground in technology. And its fundamentally redefining ownership.
Copyright isn’t just about pirating music or downloading DVDs…

McDaniel played the part of Mammy, a black housemaid, in the epic Civil War romance, Gone with the Wind. A more recent example of African-American characters playing subservient roles is The Help. It tells the story of an aspiring author during the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s who takes it upon herself to write a book detailing the African-American maids’ point of view on the white families they work for, and the hardships they go through on a daily basis. The Help was originally a book written by…

polygamy and vice versa. Groups and individuals for the legalization are
The viewpoints relating to polygamy include the religious sector, legislative and human rights (woman’s and children’s). Another possible viewpoint to be considered are those from psychologists. First off the legislative aspect of polygamy is illegal under federal law with the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act of 1862, signed by Abraham Lincoln On the flip side, polygamy is legal at the state level in Utah as this is where the roots of…

DOCTOR’S PRESCRIPTION
By Santos T. Araña, Ph.D.
GAY RIGHT vs MORALITY, ETHICS AND LAW
Is it proper for gays to use the female CR and lesbians to use the male CR? Would it be proper to allow them living together with same sexes? Most of the time I heared or even personaly observed the third sex seeking for recognition and respect. Though, respect is not asked it is voluntary given; all we need to do is to prove that we deserve to be respected. To gain respect, gays and lesbians must observe…

Words 1075 - Pages 5

* Test names and other trademarks are the property of the respective trademark holders. None of the trademark holders are affiliated with this website.