The bishop Williamson (a pupil of archbishop Lefebvre): Why is from skyscrapers dusts? Where is the steel construction? Is not the worldwide success of such a lie not a punishment from God upon the peoples of the world who do not want to have to … [More]

Proč se z ocelové konstrukce jádra mrakodrapů stal pouhý prach? Letadlo nedokáže změnit ocelové jádro mrakodrapu na prach. To umí jen výbušniny poskládané v celé budově, v konkrétních patrech. Toho si povšiml světoznámý biskup Williamson, žák arcibiskupa Lefebvra a připomněl, že když my skrze televizní zpravodajství věříme takovým nesmyslům, pak už se blíží doba světovlády Antikrista dle 2.Tesalonickým 2,10-11. Řekl, že Bůh víru v lež na nás dopustil pro naši nevěrnost (myslím zejména za neochotu mít početné rodiny). Napsal na blogu, který je dnes už zamknutý toto: Why is from skyscrapers dusts? Proc je z mrakodrapu prach? Where is the steel construction? Is not the worldwide success of such a lie not a punishment from God upon the peoples of the world who do not want to have to live up to the demands of his Truth? In the time of the Antichrist, says Scripture (II Thess II, 10-11), “to them that perish… God shall send the operation of error, to believe lying: that all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity”. Does “operation of error” not perfectly fit 9/11? Is then 9/11 not a major step towards the Antichrist? And is the Antichrist not a religious problem? I hear someone objecting: “Alright, alright, the evidence persuades me that 9/11 was an inside job. But what can I do about it?” Answer, stop making your government(s) and your media into your religion, or half your religion.... How could kerosene burning at 850° Centigrade melt each Tower’s 47 central columns made of steel which melts only at 1500° Centigrade? (But they were softened? But did the Towers wilt, or crash?) Secondly, the South Tower plane cut within, but across, its South-East Corner – then how did the Tower fall not towards the South-East but vertically downwards, “within its footprint” as in a perfect demolition? Thirdly, if (as we are told) the concrete floors pan-caked on top of one another, then how did both Towers collapse at the speed of gravity, and how, pray, did the 47 steel columns (which carried the floors and were not carried by them) not remain standing?dinoscopus.blogspot.com/.../inside%20job

I think that if a third building collapsed that wasn't hit by a plane, that that then proves that this was not a government conspiracy. A conspiracy would have arranged it such that only buildings that were hit by planes collapsed. It would be just be too foolish for a conspiracy to also set charges in a building that wasn't going to be hit by a plane. If they were going to blow up the buildings themselves and make it look like it was caused by planes hitting them, they would have known better … [More]

Shame on you. In WWII, did the Japanese invade neighboring countries and wreak destruction and misery practically unchecked? Did the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor? Did politicians or incompetent officers in the US have intelligence those Japanese planes were coming (all the way across the ocean) and let it happen to rally support? Does that mean that the US attacked its own fleet? We had intelligence of the plans of global jihadists like Bin Laden which is why we were trying to prepare. The … [More]