I dont consider it in terms of right and wrong. Rather, I see the report as a statistical snapshot, based on a good-sized sample, with no obvious bias in methodology. I'm not sure that absolute values of market share can be known. Besides, this low value isnt that surprising, is it? What do you estimate, 3.x%?

I dont consider it in terms of right and wrong. Rather, I see the report as a statistical snapshot, based on a good-sized sample, with no obvious bias in methodology. I'm not sure that absolute values of market share can be known. Besides, this low value isnt that surprising, is it? What do you estimate, 3.x%?

Of course, nothing definite can be known by design. I like it that way. My guess is that it's somewhere between those two figures at 2,x% (Only a guess.)

Good point, incognu. The fact that browsers of many distributions do not give a Linux ID may account for the low value for market share by W3Counter. As I recall, VL's browsers do not broadcast a Linux ID.

Sorry, hanumizzle, you were right about the low figure 1.34% being incorrect. Flawed methodology.