2007/12/10, cs ss <cs.subscribe / gmail.com>:
> Great - thanks for the responses!
>
> I had mostly discounted the rails option but it seems to be the best way
> to control the actual output, as there is a bit of processing that needs
> to be done on the data.
>
> I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing the easy way to do this
> rather than wrap a framework like rails around a simple db export ruby
> script!
Well, if it is just a single and static template you could even use
string interpolation to do the job. Certainly faster than REXML but
YMMV.
Kind regards
robert
--
use.inject do |as, often| as.you_can - without end