Rally outside the District and Regional Court in Mönchengladbach on 08.04.2014Here Werner N. was systematically driven to deathon behalf of the german families practiced injustice

First, you ignore you, then laugh at you, then they fight you and then you win du (Mahatma Ghandi) and in memory of Werner N.The harder and more unfair the fights are even more losers there are on all sides the children first.

You have our son Simon Tobias Tao Huber, born on 31.03.1994 not after underage right up for adoption released, but after years of full rights.On the day of the hearing of our son, he was age of eighteen.You made not only the perfect Childrens stolen, but also the perfect Parents murder.Our son is now called Tom and lives in the White family, we can prove it,see the letter from the foster mother and writing of our son, that he is now called Tom.Our son can never come back to our family and visit us. He's not our Phone number and our address where we live. We can not write our son and not call, as we have no address from him.Because you have said, the Will of the child always come before child welfare.That's why our son is now called Tom and lives in the White family.They have released against the wishes of the biological parents our son up for adoption andpreviously did not let him treat to the parents alienation syndrome (PAS ), thereforeis our son one foot in jail.See letter from Judge Borchert and OLG Dusseldorf was our son at the time ofAdoption of age eighteen.When children start fires, Mr. Huber would never call the fire department, why?Because, according to Judge Mrs. Cramer the Will of the child will always comes first and then the child's welfare.The fire department should the fire did not delete it, as it is against the child's will, and if it isagainst the child's will, it does not match the child's welfare.Then the house needs just burn and the judge Mrs. Cramer pays all Costs, she adheres private. The witnesses can confirm.Parents are responsible for their children - so liable, judge Mrs. Cramer for the child she toAdoption had released.Mr. Huber also sent this letter to the Petitions Committee of the German Federal day.

Dear parents Huber!Today received your letter from 31.10.2007 with the Kluth certificate from 08.October 2007, I can confirm first that you have done law with the rejection of the consultant. The reason called the abuse of rights.For me as an expert, it is rather the unexamined by the assessor takeover of the thesis "suspected condition after sexual abuse in early childhood with subsequent post-traumatic stress disorder" (page 7 of the report text)And further: ".. There is also the suspicion of sexual abuse in early childhood with appropriate psychological stress disorder" (page 8 of the report text). This has the evaluator, these formulated as a suspect assertion without any proof, only made in good faith, as its own. This is in psychiatry unfortunately common, one from the other depreciates.Who mustered this thesis has at least made an offense within the meaning of § § 185 (insult), 186 and 187 (slander). You should consider whether you should not make a complaint against unknown. After all, if you leave the stand so that at any time put forward a so-called manslaughter case against you.The consultant I am sending a copy of this letter and my "result of a review of the records of the hospital Neuwerk, Mönchengladbach, from 22.07.2002 with an appropriate cover letter is also attached here as a copy.This letter can be used in court.Sincerely,Prf.Dr.Wolfg.Klenner

Note from us:Polluters and indicators of sexual abuse against us is on our two children and will remain our enemy, Mr. Wolf-Dieter Englishman.The acquisition of the thesis "suspected condition after sexual abuse in early childhood with ......................makes use of the professional carer woman Krohn every year anew as her own, by the reigning law judge Mr. Lauber says, Andrea Huber would say to her, that her daughter Jessica has been abused.For us, it is not possible, vocational supervisor Margrit Krohn, Am Hock stone 71.41239 Mönchengladbach, North Rhine-WestphaliaGermany, for a successful co-operation, to have the necessary confidence, as required by the Disability Discrimination Act (BGG § 14) and the UN Disability Rights Convention (UN CRPD) Resolution 61/106http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/AG_Behindertenrecht/Resolution_61/106

It applies directly to all of the right set which by a collegiate court without error of law on 07/08/2008 in proceedings LG Bonn 14 O 41/08, in the publicly announced :"Everyone is obliged to ignore judicial findings if it considers unreasonable and possibly reinterpret up into its opposite."In case of legal knowledge or ability absurd as such be detected Direction judgmentwould have this right set of LG Bonn acting-do BGH judges to err is human to have led to the result of the recognition of our claim.Because of the regrettable deviation of the constitutional reality of the Constitutional Ideal Federal High Court can of course see no GG contemporary law, because he is thinking unlawful, arbitrary and therefore objectively immediately null and void ex tunc, arg. FG Munster v. 24.042006 to 11 K 1172/05 E, to assume that the GG-constitutional state constitutive constitutional principles of human rights application, People's sovereignty and separation of powers as conditions for GG-law could also be missing without the possible only with them success GG contemporary jurisprudenceremain off.Wrong jurisdiction is at federal judges inevitable because they suffer from extreme right distance and legitimacy Poverty: Is it irrational to assume that the citizens have entrusted with the election of a party in a parliament the power to chain order of judges, so the violence unit tyrannis (= real non-existence approved by popular sovereignty and separation of powers), so it is certainly absurd to assume that the choice of a party by the citizens of a country for a parliament constituted a grundgesetz proper transmission jurisdictional federal government authority to the party chosen by a particular Prime Minister and appointed by this state ministers, which then appoints federal judges. What are those times when a conversation about law is almost a crime because it includes the indulgence of his fate in the hands of such people!

Result of a review of the records of the hospital Neuwerk, Mönchengladbach, about Jessica Huber, born on 9/10/1989

The review is based on hospital records sheet 86. The purpose of the review is to determine whether the child's condition, as it is his parents were taken away, as filed in court on record, was the result of neglect or whether it is in the state of birth, dealing with the consequences of organic impairments, so that Jessica was likely to be regarded as a patient at risk. To clarify this also has an effect on the removal of the child Tobias, born on 31.03.1994, from the confinement of the mother, also due to neglect, so that should be prevented.Most leaves the hospital records are relevant to the stations to leading log and observation sheet. For the purpose of reviewing the underlying is an inherently smaller number of existing diagnostic or leaves - entries available.Jessica was born on 09/10/1989. The birth was by cesarean section (sectio), from the pelvic area with green discolored amniotic fluid. The Apgar scores are given as 06/08/10. Immediately on 10.10.1989, the infant was transferred from the maternity ward at the Children's Hospital and hospitalized there until 09/11/1989. suspicion of sepsis (blood poisoning) took place on 10.11.1989, a blood exchange transfusion. After a diagnosis based on clinical findings, 16.10.1989 were affected: muscular dystonia (low muscle strength), nutritional problems and hyperammonemia.The latter is a disorder of the synthesis of urea, amino acids and other organic acids, the aversion to drinking after birth, vomiting and psychomotor retardation (low delay and desire to move the body movement and coordination) has resulted. From the pylorus spasm called, so that the stomach contents are not transported further into the duodenum and small intestine. Under the one, however, 11/6/1989 subsiding nascent cerebral hemorrhage has been documented. In a report dated 28.12.1989 mentioned therein to give diagnoses from inpatient treatment also icterus praecox (jaundice) to.In summary, it should be noted that the child Jessica Huber was in infancy and in early childhood in clinical - patient treatment, because it suffered following the child's development and well-being debilitating disorders:• Caesarean section because of pelvic position on green colored amniotic• blood exchange transfusion for suspected sepsis• feeding problems due to the tendency pylorus spasm and vomiting• as well as metabolic disorders, poor feed this so-called recyclers.• cerebral hemorrhage in the first days of life• Muscle weakness, thus little desire to move and thereby delay the movement - and body coordinationA child's body, which must compensate for such organic weaknesses and dysfunctions and eventually overcome (compensate consumed, while vital energy, which is why he developed more slowly than the more fortunate peers. Accordingly, Jessica appeared at that time, measured using the example of a 3 1/2 year old child, in a general - and nutritional status (A and E), from someone who is ignorant of the childhood diseases can be misinterpreted as neglect as parents Huber confirmed sighting, they had already, as you Jessica was taken away, that it make public officials about. Explain the history of her daughter want to just because, and later it fell on deaf ears because as evidence they had only the yellow prevention into their own hands and that we can say is woefully out carelessly, it does not even contain the Apgar - values of the signatories of the precautionary issue has even read thumbing. And only now, 12 1/2 years after the birth of the child, it was possible that up to then refused to get into the files manually.To assume the parents Huber, she had neglected her daughter Jessica in such a way that should have been displayed in cases of emergency immediate action (taking into care), is far beside the point. Rather, it is with Jessica in a clinical jargon so-called high-risk patients, in which, all too easy to understand, an education under difficult conditions is present. Parents Huber had rather claim to the accompanying support youth services, as seen by the legislature in children - and Youth Welfare Act (KJHG) and has recently been made in the Children's Law Reform Act (KindRG) of youth services for the duty.Even more far side of the matter is the removal of the second child born 31/03/1994 Tobias Huber from the mother's confinement, allegedly to allow that child to not only neglect. This is not to evaluate, in medical, not the psychological, it has long been an object of the jurisdiction.For the correctness of the verification:Prof.Dr.Wolfg.Klenner052026268@T-Online.de

UNITED NATIONS Headquarters New York Secretary General Mr. Ban Ki-Moon and Ms. Marta Santos Paishttp://srsg.violenceagainstchildren.org633 Third Avenue, 6th Floor New York, NY, 10017Ladies and gentlemen, our daughter is differently handicapped. She speaks not in her german language, because when she hears her voice, it's unreal for her and when she not speaks, she makes no mistakes. If it is too long time has passed, teach her ​​to speak, the truth cannot come at the daylight. To find out why she does not speak, she had a speech therapist, the therapy was discontinued due to no prospect of success. The adoption of our son was done according to the requirements of a minor, this is not the truth, because my husband knows his real name. Germanys authorities in the areas are not set sozial. Sincerely yours Family Simon and Andrea-Martina Huber