For 500 years caucasians have been the epitomy of cultural and technological development.

How long it would have taken for china to reach european technology levels after it began it's renaissance probably ranks as long as millenia. Most likely if europe did not exist china would probably never undergo an industrial revolution. I hardly have to say anything about negroid civilisations who seemed to have reached their equilibrium of technology during the neolithic period.

The comparison is obvious, something about civilisations which are occupied by caucasians gives them an advantage in terms of technology, government, culture and military.

Nowadays, as a result of european technology and culture and trade mongoloid nations seem to have improved some and negroes and mongoloids brought up in european nations 'appear' to be just as intelligent as we are. So the idea that europe's success as a direct result of us being more intelligent, perseverant and vigilant than other races is generally accepted as a myth. People are ignorant of the fact that if these races were left to their own devices they would never reach the levels of civilisation that caucasian europe attained.

The ideal is merely the difference between the 2 view points

#1 Jews are evil and trying to take over the world, caucasians are superior to all racial groups and jews are responsible for the below view point.

#2 There is little difference between caucasians, negroes and mongoloids, the reason why europe was so succesful was because of sheer luck.

Of course the opinion #2 seems to be less ignorant and more likely, but they always seem to leave out why equal opportunity must be sacrificed so that black people who get less qualifications than white people have precedence over them when they apply for university or why the workplace must have a certain percentage of black workers and hundreds of the other unequal measures and laws that have been created by jewish extremists in the government, for whatever odd reason.

I want people to ask people with opinion #2 is why must measure be put in to increase the number of black people in universities and workplaces, why it should be easier for a non-white to get an education than a white and how universities are pressured to the point where they are willing to completely ignore their values of equal opportunity in order to increase the proportion of non-whites in their classrooms.

Of course there are 2 answers to each of those questions:

Measures must be put in to increase the number of black people in universities and workplaces because...

#1 White people get more places than black people in universities and workplaces that demand intelligence and perseverance. As a result of the clash between reality and the idea that black people and white people are of equal intelligence, culture, upbringing and education, people seem to think that blacks are somehow excluded from these jobs due to their race and not their low quality qualifications. This inaccurate superstition, which contradicts reality, has caused these measures to be implemented.

#2 all employers are racist and all refuse to employ black people

It should be easier for a non-white to get an education than a white because

#1 it shouldn't because i uphold my ideals of equal opportunity.

#2 non-white people are usually not given equal opportunity due to racism.

How are universities pressured to the point where they are willing to completely ignore their values of equal opportunity in order to increase the proportion of non-whites in their classrooms?

#1 Jewish extremist influences in the government and the involvement of white hating non-whites in the government and non-white voters have caused these laws to be introduced and enforced. If universities fail to comply they are usually sued under the ground that they did not comply and not under the grounds that they did not adhere to laws concerning equal opportunity

#2 uh..

When you apply our values of rationalism to the current situation of race and how whites (the only threat to jewish supremacy) are slowly being degraded and interbred and our heritage and culture destroyed. You can also see that the situation could be easily resolved by merely rooting out the jewish extremists and lobbying for equal opportunity.

Once true equal opportunity for all races has been implemented then it will be obvious that racism has no role to play in the evidence that supports white superiority.

It can be generally accepted and accepted very quickly that white culture is superior to other cultures. We are less superstitious, more vigilant and less likely to subside to serfdom and slavery than non-white civilisations.

Even our dictatorships had to be liberal, particularly in nordic countries whereby there had to be an avenue for people to improve themselves or enjoy themselves otherwise any lord or baron could whip up support to oust him into the crown.

Which behavioural traits are likely to be the most productive in the creation of civilisation?

If it is made obvious that white culture and white people are responsible for the existence of the modern era and that other races and cultures existence of democracy due to their superstitions white supremacy will be more easily accepted by the currently jewed up public.