Americans spend $70 billion on pets, and that money could do more good

Pet spending in the U.S. is estimated to have exceeded US$72 billion. Credit: star5112, CC BY-SA

Sylar, the border collie, has his own mansion along with a trampoline and indoor pool. The dog's adorable features, along with his notable intelligence, earned his owner's devotion along with many social media fans.

Sylar's mansion, where other pets can visit and indulge in expensive spa-like treatments such as massages, drew the media's attention to the increased spending in China on pet-related services. The Chinese are forecast to spend about US$2.6 billion on their pets by 2019 – a 50 percent increase from 2016.

Of course, these expenditures are not distributed equally among all pets. Sylar, like other celebrities, lives in the lap of luxury, while many of his fellow creatures experience hunger, homelessness, abuse and other deprivations.

How are we to think about the ethics of spending so much money on pets when it could be used to alleviate the suffering in the world?

The utilitarian tradition

Ethicists have long grappled with questions of right and wrong. One of the most notable ethical traditions – utilitarianism – has had a lot to say about how other sentient beings, besides humans, should be treated along with how resources ought to be distributed among them.

According to utilitarianism, an action is right if it produces the best overall consequences, out of all possible actions, for all those who are affected. In other words, in its simplest form, the goal is to maximize happiness and to minimize suffering.

Some philosophers, such as Thomas Scanlon, argue that ethics is about what humans "owe to each other." But utilitarianism broadens the scope of the moral community to include the interests of all sentient beings, including those of nonhuman animals. As Jeremy Bentham, one of the earliest proponents of utilitarianism, wrote in 1789, "The question is not, 'Can they reason?' nor, 'Can they talk?' but 'Can they suffer?'"

The classical utilitarians not only advocated for the interests of nonhuman animals, but also for the interests of all humans, including prisoners and women. Both Bentham and 19th-century philosopher John Stuart Millmade sucharguments centuries before it was fashionable to do so.

This was captured in Bentham's motto, "Everybody to count for one, nobody for more than one."

Credit: Chart: The Conversation, CC-BY-ND Source: American Pet Products Association
How to create the most good

Bentham's philosophy later gave rise to Peter Singer's principle of equal consideration of interests, which states when determining right and wrong, all those whose interests are affected should be included in the ethical decision-making process, and those interests ought to be weighed equally.

In fact, Singer's equal consideration of interests can be used not only to make a case against racism and sexism, but also against "speciesism" – the idea that the interests of humans count for more than the interests of other species.

It is tempting to think that people arguing for the principle of equal consideration of the interests of animals would be in favor of pet mansions and costumes. But would they?

The answer to this question can be found in Singer's view called "effective altruism," which is based on the premise that many affluent people spend a lot of money on nonnecessities such as pet costumes or the latest technological gadget. According to one estimate, about $440 million of pet spending in the U.S. was on Halloween pet costumes alone. If that money was instead donated to a good cause, then more good or utility could be produced.

When thinking about creating the most good possible, effective altruism maintains that people should reflect on how the allocation of their resources such as their money and time impacts other sentient beings.

Those persuaded by the moral argument behind the effective altruism movement may want to allocate their resources differently.

If a fraction of worldwide pet spending, say 25 percent, was allocated elsewhere – for instance, to mitigating the suffering of millions of farm animals or to preventing malaria by providing mosquito nets – more good could certainly be done.

As an ethicist, pet owner and vegetarian, I don't deny that the interests of animals matter, and while Sylar is indeed one privileged pup, his lifestyle comes with costs to others and to the planet itself.

Related Stories

Anti-speciesism and veganism are presented today as projects for society as a whole. Several political parties have even recently structured themselves under this banner, such as DierAnimal in Belgium and Rassemblement des ...

Most of us are faced with ethical decisions on a regular basis. Some are relatively minor – perhaps your cousin makes a new recipe and it really doesn't taste good, and you have to decide whether to tell the truth or a ...

A video recently doing the rounds on Facebook included a segment from the BBC comedy quiz show QI. The video asks which of avocados, almonds, melon, kiwi or butternut squash are suitable for vegans. The answer, at least according ...

Christmas holidays offer a time for families to get together, but for retailers, holiday sales can represent up to 20% of annual revenue. How consumers spend money during this time period is of interest for retailers as well ...

Recommended for you

Past studies have found that a variety of complex networks, from biological systems to social media networks, can exhibit universal topological characteristics. These universal characteristics, however, do not always translate ...

Metasurfaces are two-dimensional (2-D) metamaterials that can control scattering waves of a light beam. Their applications include thin-sheet polarizers, beam splitters, beam steerers and lenses. These structures can control ...

The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) was launched on April 18 of last year with the primary objective of discovering transiting planets smaller than Neptune around stars bright enough for spectroscopic investigations ...

A pair of researchers at Purdue University has found a way to use a diatomic Ni-Ni catalyst to synthesize cyclopentenes. In their paper published in the journal Science, You-Yun Zhou and Christopher Uyeda describe their method ...

Photocatalysts – materials that trigger chemical reactions when hit by light – are important in a number of natural and industrial processes, from producing hydrogen for fuel to enabling photosynthesis.

Neutron stars are among the densest-known objects in the universe, withstanding pressures so great that one teaspoon of a star's material would equal about 15 times the weight of the moon. Yet as it turns out, protons—the ...

its the liberal way.... use examples from the 0.0001% to tell the other 99.9999% how they should live. Do pets need all those things? NO. Do people need pets? Obviously, I know one person who does, but just doesn't know it.

This statement defies belief (since Singer main fame is in animal right's): "In fact, Singer's equal consideration of interests can be used not only to make a case against racism and sexism, but also against "speciesism" – the idea that the interests of humans count for more than the interests of other species." Not "but also"--Singer's equal consideration of interest started there.

what about the money that is wasted on make up? or in bling bling for the cars? or in weapons?

of course pets are necessary.... most children are raised in chaos, in divorced homes, in environments with no or little affection, so a pet helps them to cope with life. I bet there must be studies indicating that pet owners that are engaged with their companion are less prompt to bad things like hurting others, hurting themselves, and so on. Loneliness, lack of care, isolation, all can be very high in the human civilization. Children, disabled and elderly suffer the most from humans.... so there are substances to cope, there are pets, there is exercise and so on.

pets need things, like vet physicians, like drugs, eg., cats need catnip. I wonder if cats are as harmful for little ecosystems if they are high on catnip frequently.... I wonder if their predatory tendencies is reduced by using catnip and therefore making them more friendly to the surroundings. Dogs usually need things too to calm down, some can have issues.

Please sign in to add a comment.
Registration is free, and takes less than a minute.
Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.