Drawing upon decades of experience, RAND provides research services, systematic analysis, and innovative thinking to a global clientele that includes government agencies, foundations, and private-sector firms.

The Pardee RAND Graduate School (PRGS.edu) is the largest public policy Ph.D. program in the nation and the only program based at an independent public policy research organization—the RAND Corporation.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

Department of Defense (DoD) product support business case analyses (BCAs) compare alternative courses of action (COAs) for sustaining weapon systems and recommend ways to improve on current sustainment practice. This document explains how to apply standard Office of Management and Budget and DoD guidance on project evaluation to product support BCAs in a way that allows senior DoD decisionmakers to use net present value (NPV) as the dominant figure of merit for comparing COAs. It identifies a primary performance attribute and estimates the cost of ensuring that every COA meets a target level of performance for this attribute. This begins a process of estimating the annual cash flows for each COA relative to a baseline COA. The approach then elicits from subject matter experts (1) what sources of risk might delay or thwart each COA's efforts to achieve target performance and (2) how each source of risk affects each COA's efforts. It allows these efforts to differ across potential future states. Each future state yields a different set of annual cash flows based on (1) the cash flows associated with trouble-free implementation, including transition and implementation costs and savings, and (2) the effects of sources of risk that degrade implementation. The approach ultimately states the findings of a BCA in terms of dollar values of NPVs for COAs — figures that senior decisionmakers understand intuitively, because they use them routinely in decisions about defense resource management.

Table of Contents

Chapter One

Introduction

Chapter Two

Assessing the NPV of a COA Element

Chapter Three

Risk Drivers Relevant to COA Elements

Chapter Four

Aggregating Information on Different Risk Drivers Relevant to a COA Element

Chapter Five

Formal Elicitation of Information on Risk Associated with COA Elements

Chapter Six

Integrating the Pieces to Characterize a COA

Chapter Seven

Providing Support for Senior Decisionmakers

Appendix A

Risk Workshop "Homework" Materials

Appendix B

Risk Workshop Facilitation Protocol

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was sponsored by Maj Gen Dwyer L. Dennis, executive officer of the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Fighter-Bomber Directorate, and conducted by the Resource Management Program within RAND Project AIR FORCE.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.

Explore

Related Topics

Stay Informed

RAND Policy Currents

Get weekly updates from RAND.

Email

Format:

Chicago Manual of Style

RAND Corporation Style Manual

Camm, Frank, John Matsumura, Lauren A. Mayer, and Kyle Siler-Evans, A New Methodology for Conducting Product Support Business Case Analysis (BCA): With Illustrations from the F-22 Product Support BCA. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2017. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1664.html. Also available in print form.

Camm, Frank, John Matsumura, Lauren A. Mayer, and Kyle Siler-Evans, A New Methodology for Conducting Product Support Business Case Analysis (BCA): With Illustrations from the F-22 Product Support BCA, Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation, RR-1664-AF, 2017. As of August 16, 2019: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1664.html

The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.