New Twin Tower Collapse Model Could Squash 9/11 Conspiracies

New Twin Tower Collapse Model Could Squash 9/11 Conspiracies

Now a materials scientist has come up with a more scientific explanation for the mystery booms, and says his model of the Twin Towers collapse
leaves no room for conspiracies. "My model explains all the observed features on 11th September: the explosions, molten metal coming out of the
window, the time passing between the crash and the collapse, the fact that the explosions took place in a floor below the place it was burning, and
the rapid collapse," Christen Simensen of SINTEF, a research organization in Norway, told Life's Little Mysteries.

Read, divulge. And stop the endless bickering. There is no use in pointing fingers and its now clear that the goverment did not do it. This article
and experiment tackle almost all truthers theories and seeing that this guy is a trustworthy scientist.. Ima have to trust him more than some college
kid in his moms basement. OS-er gain another point. Yay yay yay!

But the scenario described in the article is not the only definite scenario that can happen in that circumstance. After reading, I figured Youtube
would have some video of the process showing what happens. Sure enough they did. The first video I watched showed what seemed to be a small fire and
I'm guessing molten aluminum. After they spray water on it quickly explodes. Another video showed people dropping a crucible of molten aluminum in a
bucket of water. Sure enough there is no explosion and one of the people in the video even laments on the lack of one.

While it does give another perspective, and it could provide answers I do not feel like it is a "nail in the coffin." I believe it is just as likely
to create more doubt and speculation than to create believers of the OS.

I would also like to mention, no fire fighters even made it to the fires in the towers before they collapsed. On September 11th I just watched the
lovely hours of terror play out, and the fire men were just getting to the floor survivors were on when the buildings came down. Most of the men,
didn't even make it to the fires, and as far as I know not one pump was pumping water into the tower when it came down. Nice try, but there are so
many holes, the fire was not hot enough to even melt the steel involved in the structure, nor was there any molten Aluminum in the basements or lobby
levels, that both first responders and survivors report hearing and witnessing devastation before the towers collapsed. Excellent try, great article,
interesting theory, but so far from the truth. There are more engineers, scientists, and architects who believe otherwise. You get a flag for effort,
and to attract those more suited to explain why this just doesn't satisfy any bit of my disbelief.

I don't see where this debunks that it wasn't an inside job. You really believe they just fell down by themselves including building 7? I don't
understand how anyone would take I person and believe them over hundreds of experts who have put there reputations on the line.

Simensen's new collapse model has not gained immediate acceptance by proponents of earlier models.

Eagar also objects to the notion that the aluminum, if it did melt, would definitely have reacted with the water it encountered. Most of the time when
water is sprayed on molten aluminum, "there is no explosion because the water turns to steam and excludes the oxygen, preventing the growth of the
combustion," he said.

It also states that the people who believe the first explanation do not accept this one, so if the people who believe terrorists brought down the
building do not believe this is why it fell, as well they don't accept conspiracy theories. As well, it was stated in many reports that Majority of
the jet fuel was burnt up outside the building, which kind of puts a damper on this articles explanation of how the fire got hot enough to melt
anything, especially with all that black smoke we see implicating a cool smothered fire.

Fail.
This gives no answer as to why traces of nano thermite was found. Are you forgetting about everything else that happened on that day. Bombs found in
the bridges. So many unanswered questions. Why was fema already there a day before. Anyways this proves nothing. 9 11 was an inside job.

Why are you so quick to believe this scientist and reject other scientists theories? A BYU professor that actually had pieces of WTC found thermate in
them. To me a person that actually has first-hand sources of the material would be more educated as to the cause of the collapse.

I have some experience with explosives, demolition and metal smelting. Like everyone else, I watched the events unfold that day and I understood the
processes that resulted in the collapse. I saw what happened as it unfolded and believe it happened just the way that I saw that it did.
Impact, fire, weakening, collapse.

On the other hand, there are a lot of suspicious coincidences surrounding everything else about the events leading up to that day and our countries
and leaders response to the aftermath.

Things like ignorance. denial, lies, revenge, wars. All of which are as evident to my mind as the attacks themselves. No single report or analysis is
going to answer all these in my mind, prolly never will... until Judgment Day. Then the books will be opened and the truth will be known.

And according to a lot of people here on ATS, that day is not to far off either.

One scientist against thousands of Architects, Structural Engineers, Fire fighters, and Pilots for 9/11 truth and you want to put all your eggs in
this guys basket?

Go right ahead...

Oh right so people should put "all your eggs" in the basket of a conspiracy theorist with no actual proof. I have seen many assumptions and
backyard scientist, but none of them have had any credible evidence to the contrary of the official story, contrary yes but not credible.

9/11 Truthers DEBUNKED FOREVER

Now a materials scientist has come up with a more scientific explanation for the mystery booms, and says his model of the Twin Towers collapse
leaves no room for conspiracies. "My model explains all the observed features on 11th September: the explosions, molten metal coming out of the
window, the time passing between the crash and the collapse, the fact that the explosions took place in a floor below the place it was burning, and
the rapid collapse," Christen Simensen of SINTEF, a research organization in Norway, told Life's Little Mysteries.

Like the cover of a cheap romance novel...? For me it was never about the thermite or the explosives evidence
but all the rest of the evidence added up. I don't think it was holograms and I think planes operated by terrorist hit those buildings but they were
guaranteed to fall and had help on the inside. I think this was initiated NOT BY THE US Government per se...but a powerful and secretive interior body
within the government so we could start a war and invade Iraq. Building 7... No one can explain that.

Exactly...true some mistakes were made, some perhaps even intentionally...and therein lies the true conspiracy. But, to say that it was planed from
the inside before the event, with planted explosives and a wired building is just beyond comprehension...did "they" allow it to proceed, after the
plot was discovered...perhaps. but this is not the same thing as an inside orchestrated event.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.