State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza

2005-01-31

02

Amy Vezza

IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent

2005-01-31

02

Amy Vezza

IESG has approved the document

2005-01-31

02

Amy Vezza

Closed "Approve" ballot

2005-01-28

02

Alex Zinin

State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Alex Zinin

2004-12-03

02

(System)

Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-12-02

2004-12-02

02

Amy Vezza

State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza

2004-12-01

02

Michelle Cotton

IANA Comments: We understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.

2004-12-01

02

Margaret Cullen

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Margaret Wasserman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Margaret Wasserman

2004-12-01

02

Harald Alvestrand

Review by Mary Barnes, Gen-ART

It doesn't appear that all the previous Discusses have been adequately addressed.

1. Previous Comment: Russ Housley: Comment ...

Review by Mary Barnes, Gen-ART

It doesn't appear that all the previous Discusses have been adequately addressed.

1. Previous Comment: Russ Housley: Comment: draft-idr-bgp-implementation-01: The abstract and the introduction state that the the editors make no claim as to the accuracy of the information provided. It would be much better to make a positive statement in the introduction, and say nothing in the abstract. Perhaps something like: The editors have assembled information provided by four implementors: Alcatel, Cisco, Laurel, and NextHop.

The draft currently states the following, which doesn't seem to match the intent of the suggestion: "This document provides a survey of the BGP-4 implementation draft- ietf-idr-bgp4-24.txt. After a brief summary, each response is listed. The editors created the draft based on the input given by those contributors responding to the survey.

The editors did not verify the accuracy of the information submitted by contributor by an exterior means. The contributors are experts with the products they reported on."

I would agree with Russ' suggestion that the whole concept of accuracy of the information be dropped from the abstract (i.e. that second paragraph). think it's quite clear that the information is survey results (and not from some sort of validated interop event), thus there's no need to even discuss that.

2. Previous Comment: Margaret Wasserman comment on the following statement: For every item listed (259 questions), the respondents indicated whether their implementation supports the Functionality/Description or not (Y/N) indicated by the RFC2199 [RFC2119] language. Of the 259 questions in the survey, had two implementations giving an affirmative response (two "y" or "y" and "O")

Also, what is an "O" response? This is >> explained later, but it would help to explain it before this >> section.

3. My previous comment on the past review was that the security considerations section states "This document does not address any security issues."

However, section 3.53 "Security Considerations" does highlight that RFC2385 is a MUST authentication mechanism. For completeness, it might be useful to highlight in the security considerations section that all the implementations, as reported, did satisfy the security requirements.

2004-11-29

02

Thomas Narten

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Thomas Narten

2004-11-28

02

Margaret Cullen

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Margaret Wasserman has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Margaret Wasserman

2004-11-23

02

Bert Wijnen

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bert Wijnen

2004-11-23

02

Sam Hartman

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman

2004-11-23

02

Alex Zinin

State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Alex Zinin

2004-11-23

02

Alex Zinin

Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-12-02 by Alex Zinin

2004-11-11

02

(System)

Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed

2004-11-11

02

(System)

New version available: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-implementation-02.txt

2004-09-16

02

Russ Housley

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley

2004-07-22

02

Amy Vezza

State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza

2004-07-22

02

Amy Vezza

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Amy Vezza

2004-07-22

02

Thomas Narten

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Thomas Narten

2004-07-22

02

Thomas Narten

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten

2004-07-22

02

Bill Fenner

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner

2004-07-22

02

Jon Peterson

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson

2004-07-22

02

Margaret Cullen

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman

2004-07-21

02

Steven Bellovin

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin

2004-07-21

02

David Kessens

[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens

2004-07-21

02

Russ Housley

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley

2004-07-21

02

Harald Alvestrand

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Harald Alvestrand has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Harald Alvestrand

2004-07-21

02

Bert Wijnen

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to Discuss from Undefined by Bert Wijnen

2004-07-21

02

Bert Wijnen

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen

2004-07-21

02

Harald Alvestrand

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Harald Alvestrand has been changed to Discuss from Undefined by Harald Alvestrand

2004-07-20

02

Ted Hardie

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Ted Hardie

2004-07-20

02

Ted Hardie

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie

2004-07-20

02

Harald Alvestrand

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand

2004-07-15

02

Scott Hollenbeck

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Scott Hollenbeck

2004-07-15

02

Scott Hollenbeck

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck

2004-07-15

02

Alex Zinin

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Alex Zinin has been changed to Yes from Undefined by Alex Zinin

2004-07-15

02

Alex Zinin

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Alex Zinin has been changed to Undefined from Yes by Alex Zinin

2004-07-15

02

Alex Zinin

State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup by Alex Zinin

2004-07-15

02

Alex Zinin

Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-07-22 by Alex Zinin

2004-07-15

02

Alex Zinin

[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alex Zinin

2004-07-15

02

Alex Zinin

Ballot has been issued by Alex Zinin

2004-07-15

02

Alex Zinin

Created "Approve" ballot

2004-07-12

02

(System)

Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed

2004-07-12

01

(System)

New version available: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-implementation-01.txt

2004-04-16

02

Alex Zinin

State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for Writeup by Alex Zinin

2004-04-13

02

(System)

State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system

2004-03-16

02

Amy Vezza

Last call sent

2004-03-16

02

Amy Vezza

State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza

2004-03-16

02

Alex Zinin

Last Call was requested by Alex Zinin

2004-03-16

02

Alex Zinin

State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Alex Zinin