a few years ago,paul mccartneys picture wan in tht l.a.weekley on the right.on the left,was an artiele,art,shows that rocked my world,francine dancer,@1.do you have a copy?

Rich

Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 | 06:01 PM

Can someone point me to a website that actually has something REAL about current Paul's and pre 1966 Paul's fingerprints not matching? The only place I can find it referenced is on Paul is dead sites. I can find no mention of it in any legit story.

P.S. Ruth McCartney is Paul's step sister. They are not related by blood.

The Debater
in Nowhere, Arkansas

Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 | 04:02 PM

Hey!!
Every body!
I don't know where to get finger prints sorry and no I don't have a copy.
I know this is a Is Paul McCartney dead thread but I just was wondering if some of you would check out some of my music and tell me what cha think about!!!

Please check it out!!
I'M DIEING FOR SOME CRITISISM!!!
THANKS SOOO MUCH!!!!
ALSO!!!
I still believe Paul Is alive.
If someone had to be him it would have been revealed a LONG time ago and no one can stay away from their real family for that long so he must be the real Paul McCartney.
:}]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

D F Stuckey
in AUckland New Zealand

Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 | 06:12 PM

Well, Debater, I agree with you partly about Paul - But as to your idea about no-one staying away from their family that long, might I just say Lord Lucan?

Will check out your MySpace site though

The Debater
in Nowhere, Arkansas

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 | 11:49 AM

Yeah.
I see what cha saying.
But its kinda the obvious thing.
I don't think anyone really would do that....IT'S PAUL MCCARTNEY FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!
Why would people wanna think that he's dead any way?
If you're a real Beatles fan You'll believe that he is alive which I know for a Fact that he is!!!
:]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

P.S.
Don't ask me why it's just what I think sooooo yeah.

Dizzle
in California

Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 | 03:47 AM

all i can say this is one weird world. if you dont believe or don't that's on you. im no beatles fan but im more interested on the manner they became famous. the machine was surely behind them so anything is freaking possible. sidenote plastic surgery came out in the 1930s. 30 years im sure someone learned something. people are smarter and dumber than you think. i have no clue if that is the real or fake one.

The Debater
in Nowhere, Arkansas

Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 | 09:07 PM

ok.
So you have a different oppinion.
I respect that.
Though some people maybe be stupid (believe me I would know) but not THAT stupid.
Plus I don't really base it off of what the people think I think of if someone else really did try to be Paul McCartney and how it would never work.
I think of the stuff that wouldn't work.
Paul is my favorite beatle so i really do try to believe that he's not dead which I think in fact that he isn't.
I mean come on people!!!
Now I know your not a beatles fan and yes I know plastic surgery came out way back then but seriously if a guy tried to be paul mccartney then how would he be able to see his real family, huh??
That's something he wouldn't be able to do because of the poaratzi (I think I spelt that wrong....oh well.) ya know???
They would be following him every.
I'm just making a point.
If anyopne on here says I'm wrong or even right I don't care and I won't be changing my mind any time soon.
That's just what I believe.
Thank you for your opinion though.
:]]]]]]]]]]]]]

phiggs
in Canada

Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 | 12:05 PM

Why do we have to talk about the thousands of audio & visual clues they put out there? Those have nearly all been discovered and have led us to the greater picture now. Please focus on the alarming physical differences between the genuine James Paul and the imposter Sir Paul. (height difference, skull diameter, eye sockets, scarring, ear position..) Not to mention any evidence of cover ups, slip ups, suspicous deaths... seriously we've all seen & heard the clues.. lets talk about the actual PROOF now... GL people.

The Debater
in Nowhere, Arkansas

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 | 12:13 AM

well it's been a while sense I've looked at any evidence that he is dead or not.
So some one please send me some sites that you use to tell if he is or not.
I would like to see how everyone gets there opinoin.
Thanks!!!

My music check it out!!
Thanks!!
lol.
But seriously I would like to see where you guys get your information!!
THANKS!!
Please send me the link!!
;]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

alvaro2
in google

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 | 03:43 PM

pual is soo dead there the clues they left and no its not to make money cause then they would have been miilonare and secound his dead i saw it in the national enquire and pual died based on clues in a yellow car subamirne cause they were running out of weed yesturday and they love him yeah yeah yah altohough i question if there gay and pual is dead he told me while we had sex last night let me tell you sex with the clone of pual is soo good i made him say hey jude any ways after i stuck my big ass in his cute littel but he said mercy me heres a clue am dead see

The Debater
in Nowhere, Arkansas

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 | 11:40 PM

wow.
that was one of the most stupid thing I've ever read.
You lost sometime of your life.....AND YOU'LL NEVER GET IT BACK!!!!
>:D
lol.
Plus that didn't even really help....at all.
HoW tHe FuCk DoEs ThAt HeLp PrOvE a PoInT?!?!?!?!?!?
>.<

Esme

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 | 12:45 AM

hahahah wow! that was... yea. debater you said it perfectly. haha so yeaaaa i haven't been here in a while, but i see no new points have been brought to the table. ahhh well. debater... your music is effing fabulous. great job!

The Debater
in Nowhere, Arkansas

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 | 05:21 PM

Yeah!!
You havn't ben on in a while!!
lol.
Thanks by the way!!
Tell your frnds!!
lol.
Also it's true no new facts have really been pointed out.
:]]]]]]]]

PAULISDEADFOOLSAREWRONG,FOOL

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 | 05:55 PM

he got replaced by a william shears campbell

The Debater
in Somewhere, Arkansas

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 | 09:21 PM

ummmm.....ok.
Well if he was EVERYONE would know by now...sooooo sorry don't believe ya.
:]]

Frank
in Louisiana USA

Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 | 08:42 PM

For a while I had no idea whether Paul was dead or not, after all it seemed plausable. There are 6 billion people on this earth, some are bound to look a like.... But here's what finally helped me decide.

THE ULTIMATE 'IS PAUL DEAD' TEST:
Try accomplishing the following task - Find someone who can play guitar like it's nothing, has an incredible voice, is also an incredible piano player, AND IS A PROFESSIONAL DRUMMER (Paul plays piano, guitar, base guitar, and drums -- he actually filled in for ringo on a few songs). Oh one more thing, this person also has to look exactly like you to the point where he could fool your parents and family (same age, same skin color, same color eyes, everything).

There's a task that is literally impossible.

So even if you try to say "well it was plastic surgery", there is no plastic surgeon in this world who can permanently make you look like a carbon copy of someone else, change your voice tone, give you the ability to sing through an incredible range of notes, have you singing in perfect pitch, and teach you how to play 3 instruments to the point of mastery.

Paul is alive and well and unfortunately there will never be anyone who will be able to take his place.

Unseen
in London

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 | 04:56 PM

I bet that John Lennon and Elvis Priestly are down in Mexico playing golf right now.

The Debater
in nowhere land.

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 | 10:45 PM

YAY!!!
more people think he's alive yeah!!!!
:]]]]]]]

Esme

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 | 01:11 PM

I'm glad to finally see more people who make sense around here. =]

The Debater
in nowhere land.

Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 | 05:26 PM

I know, right?

Esme

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 | 10:09 AM

More people need to find this forum. =\

Burmess
in USA

Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 | 11:14 AM

IMHO. This whole matter was probably created by John Lennon. After hearing from people in the know that John was extremely abusive to his first wife, from his son on an interview the same and watching him on a rare interview where he doesn't look like he combed his hair in 3 months verbally abusing Yoko, I came to the conclusion that the possibility of him being a severely deranged genious could be possible. All the clues are to be found on albums or sound tracks. These photos can be manufactured and changed, even back then. No wonder The Beatles broke up. If John was threatening me as I hear and see, I would leave too.

Rob

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 | 01:00 AM

Well, let's see... We've had someone from MFH trying to--as it were--fit a square peg into a round hole. It doesn't work, the heads of the two men don't match up, and their bodies are different!

So then we had Esme and Debater who basically told us that if something looks a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck--it absolutely, positively cannot be anything other than a pigeon! And you even go a bit farther and say that a pigeon can even turn into a duck or vice-versa--or at least some of it's body parts can change from duck to bird parts or bird to duck parts!

You've been so brainwashed it's not even funny! I've said it before and I'll say it again, it doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to see the two men are DIFFERENT!

Appearantly some of you people were deprived of Sesame Street when you were younger, but they had (still have) a segment on differences where they show four boxes. Typically, in the each of the boxes are things that are related, but one of the things in one of the boxes is not like the others. They then ask you to tell which one is different. This is a good exercise for cognitive developement in young children. I would suggest you have your mommy help you to learn about similarities differences.

A lot of people have suggested the Beatles did it as a joke and to increase sales. Well, even with half a mind to think about it, it is an extremely ludicrous argument.

Why the hell would they joke about death?specifically concerning one of their bandmates? Where is the precident? Did they joke about Stuart Sutcliff's death? Did they joke about Brian Epstein's death? Did they joke about people close to them like John's mom Julia or Paul's mom Mary? Did they joke about the death of any other singers like Buddy Holly or Otis Redding?

Why the would they Beatles resort to a gimmick to try and make more money? They were already the top grossing band in the world at the time, so money really wasn't an issue.

You can appreciate the musicianship of both persons without having to try and mold them into one body. By the way, the clues (whether purposefull or not), have continued on in the solo albums--you just have to LOOK and LISTEN.

Sweet Alyssa
in Somewhere, Arkansas

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 | 03:12 AM

hey this is the debater.
changin' names because the debater just seems stupid...sooo rawr.
any who yeah sure you think he's dead.
And yes i know you think it' easy to tell between the two but gues what!!!
If it were so easy then this shit would have been over LONG before i was born.
Also don't get all "YOUR STUPID YOUR STUPID AND DON'T FORGET YOU ARE STUPID" attitude.
Seriously not needed and it makes you look like even more of an ass.
Also the clues I think is just a bunch of bullshit.
People thought it be cool to play them backwards and they "made" messages out of them.
I even listened to when they sayed that John supposedly said "I buried Paul"
And I listen well.
Music is my life literally and he said cranberry sauce....no joke.
sooo yeah.
I really don't care an you can try to change my mind all ya want.
By the way WTF do some beatles fan think he's dead???
I mean come on!!!
WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO THINK THAT HE'S DEAD?!?!?
>:[[[[[

Esme

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 | 01:15 PM

I find your attempts at insult hilarious. I'm very aware of cognitive development in children as I teach for a living and have a young daughter. No one said they did it to make more money. They were still very young at the time and could have just done it for fun.

"Why the hell would they joke about death?"

They never once said, "Paul is dead." What is that question based on, Rob? I'm still not convinced.

By the way...

glad you're back, Rob. =P

Sweet Alyssa.
in With the Fool on the Hill.

Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 | 12:05 AM

Yeah w/e.
I know that was kinda childish but It's like come it's obvious that he's not dead.
Get it through your head.
Sooo yeah.
That's it.
Have a nice day.
;]

Big fan
in Canada

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 | 11:29 PM

Hi there....i'm rather late to join. But here goes...Been a Beatle's fan since they first were popular. I had a total crush on Paul when i was a kid. I personally think the whole paul is dead thing is an elaborate and amazing piece of urban legend.Really...think about it.... I agree, how could any imposter fill the role of the multi-talented, handsome Paul so amazingly well? It seems darn unlikely doesn't it. And to do it all left handed as well??? Play the bass left-handed? The acoustic? Sign autographs? And that voice.....it is sooo distinct. I also agree with the whole family thing.....really wouldn't they kind of notice???. Also, there are photos of john and paul in later years....ie White Album, where they are sharing laughs and looking very much like close old friends. Could that happen with an imposter??? I think Paul is Paul. True, sometimes he looks taller, or his head looks bigger.....but photos are like that. Try and find two of yourself where you look exacltly the same. Yet.....i know when this all first came out, i was truly shocked. Everyone was kind of blown away by it but most people i knew thought it was a load of crap.i actually played Revolution #9 backwards and the "turn me on dead man" thing was truly sketchy. I listened to all the clues....most were sketchy or had other explanations. I think there was something that kicked off the rumor and then people just kept elaborating and elaborating turning it into one of the biggest hoaxes of the century. I choose to look at it that way because it really is too painful to think that paul might have been killed so horrifically, and that someone stole his identity and has been living off it ever since.

Sweet Alyssa
in In The Middle of Nowhere

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 | 03:19 PM

THANK YOU!!!!!
FINALLY!!!
HAHA!!!
>.<

Rob

Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 | 10:43 PM

Hi there....i'm rather late to join. But here goes...Been a Beatle's fan since they first were popular. I had a total crush on Paul when i was a kid. I personally think people who think the whole paul is dead thing is a hoax are building an elaborate and amazing piece of urban legend. Really...think about it.... Doubters make excuses about Paul being dead by trying to explain away that no imposter could possibly fill the role of the multi-talented, handsome Paul so amazingly well? To them it seems darn unlikely? And to do it all left handed as well??? No one could learn to play bass left-handed--they say? Or acoustic--they say? Sign autographs--they say? And that voice of Paul's sooo distinct, no one could imitate, but of course the doubters refuse to listen to the records too... Besides to the doubters who are hearing impaired, it it all sounds the same anyway. And the doubters bring up the family and say wouldn't they kind of notice (of course they'll completely disregard two family photos where there are two completely different men who are supposed to be "Paul")???. Also, the doubters point out there are photos of john and paul in later years....ie White Album, where they are sharing laughs and looking very much like close old friends (although this not really evidence enough though of the same old two friends--maybe they're just having a moment of laughter?). Doubters ask if that could that happen with an imposter, but they've never heard of acting??? I think Paul is Paul--of course Paul is Paul, he was always Paul, but if we are talking about the replacement that has imitated as Paul since 1967, he has never really made himself Paul--just a good impersonator). Doubters will admit that the "Paul" looks taller, or his head looks bigger.....And if you take two photos of yourself, is it really that difficult to tell it's the same person? Yet.....i know when this all first came out, i was truly shocked. Everyone was kind of blown away by it but most people i knew thought it was a load of crap.i actually played Revolution #9 backwards and the "turn me on dead man" thing was truly sketchy. I listened to all the clues....most were sketchy or had other explanations. I think there was something that kicked off the rumor and then doubters have just been trying to find a way to squash the rumor by elaborating and elaborating turning it into one of the biggest hoaxes of the century. Doubters choose to look at it that way because it is really is too painful to think that Paul might actually be dead, and that someone stole his identity and has been living off it ever since.

Rob

Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 | 10:45 PM

Esme, the remaining Beatles repeatedly stated that Paul was dead--literally and metaphorically--you just never, ever listened to them.

Ana
in Madrid, Spain

Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 | 12:17 PM

Hi, I'm a female who also had a crush on Paul when I was 13 y.o. He was then the leader of "Wings" with her wife Linda and Denny (Penny) Laine. "London Town" was my preferred album. I discovered "The Beatles" little by little because there was a second beatlemania in the world at this time. Their music was incredible to me... Their voices, the lyrics, everything... Paul's voice was definitely the best I've ever heard in pop music. His voice is the proof he is the same man I was in love with. Noone can fake his voice. I guess I am still a bit in love.

Esme

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 | 01:38 PM

Rob, it was a dj in Detroit who announced that Paul is dead. None of the band members ever *seriously* stated that Paul is dead.

number1fan
in land of smarties

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 | 04:03 AM

he is not dead. He is really alive. and rita who was supposed to have made the car crash in the song says lovely rita

Whitehorse
in Santa Cruz California

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 | 04:38 PM

Wow nice to see your site...i have been getting so much crap from pseudo Beatle fans telling me I am crazy and out of my mind for thinking Paul McCartney died in Nov 1966... I think he was killed so the powers that be could take over the most powerful rock band in history.

Youreallcrazy
in USA

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 | 02:02 AM

Seriously... SERIOUSLY? People sit on a forum.... for months at a time to argue if some guy they don't even know is dead?? Who the hell really cares if the real guy died? I mean. You're getting the music you wanted... it still made history... they still got their money... Are you really that broken up about things that may or may not have happened??

And the "machine" just wanting to take over the most "POWERFUL ROCK BAND IN THE WORLD"... what the hell do you think rockbands are going to accomplish with the world so that some political mastermind would want to 'OVER TAKE' them... really. Get a life, people.

Jasmine

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 | 12:30 AM

i see some very good arguments, especially made by Rob, but i suppose i PERSONALLY need proof. haha, i know proof can't be given to every single person out there who doesn't believe it, but you could tell me the fingerprint's didn't match up, but it doesn't mean it's true. aaany body can say aaanything and say it's been proven, but you'll never know if it actually was. i haven't seen any ACTUAL proof of the fingerprints having cahnged other then the fact that people have simple posted it on the internet. how does any body know it's actually true?
(i used the fingerprint argument because it is the most convincing of them all. actually, the only convincing one.)
the whole conspiracy is completely NUTS in some aspects. i mean, some people come up with the most ridiculous things.
P.S.
even if the real Paul McCartney died, this replacement is DAMN good! he wrote some beeeautiful songs! Hey Jude and Let it Be being my favourite post 1966 songs of his. he's either the best double in the world or the real Paul. either way turned out good, really.

Esme

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 | 10:20 AM

Well said, Jasmine! =)

yahpete Member

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 | 09:16 AM

Never claim that paul is alive or you could be banned.

yahpete Member

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 | 09:19 AM

You need DNA comparisons and dental comparisons to prove that someone is an imposter. I suppose that I will be banned from this forum also for suggesting such a hideous slant.

yahpete Member

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 | 09:26 AM

'Paul is dead people' are fanatics who are looking for a cause which does not exist. They have no scientific evidence of his death and replacement and need to get out more to have fun. Leave Macca alone. He has had a long busy tragic life.

papadave

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 | 10:23 AM

Paul is Dead...this is what this site is about...not to convince people that never did any research...can we send the Master Debater on his way?...no clue, no research, he is clutter to those seeking the truth...do your research Debater and catch up with us then comment ...otherwise go away... Om Love Light Paul is so dead...
Sir faul is a clever New World Order trickster up to NO GOOD!!! Ripped off our beloved Paul McCartney.

Esme

Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 | 12:16 PM

You could be a bit more respectful, Papa. The Debater strongly believes in what she has said here. Everyone has a right to voice his or her opinions on this forum.

peter birbas
in smithfield

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 | 07:41 PM

this is scaring me the facts. i still havent tried lsd. shit man can any one help me if you can i am the no where man

papadave

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 | 06:25 PM

Funny PIA people seem to call names and belittle people and that kind of thing while the PID people are looking for clues... PIA people usually don't have a clue...

i will not say my real name
in somewhere

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 | 08:01 PM

OK people wtf(btw that stands for what the fudge)? paul is sooo alive ok you know how they were all flipping out because pon the abbey road cover paul's legs weren't in sync with all the others? well ok stand up what leg goes forward first huh? if you are right handed your left foot goes up first if you are left handed your right foot goes out first! my gym teavher tells me about. . . THE LAW OF OPPSITION DUH!!!!! ok seriously if a 12 year old can figure this out all you people are just terrible,ok and he was holding a ciggerete in his right hand. well seriously? DID HE SIGN A FRREAKING CONTRACT THAT SAYS HE HAS TO HOLD EVERYTHING WITH HIS LEFT HAND? in another album b4 the hoax he is holding it with his left hand explain that know you big moron, also how low can you get? you were all flipping out becauseof the color that they were wearing i mean really? wow some idiot must have put his/her heart and soul into reasearching all thsi crap i mean this is ovious stuff man. and the opd thing you can clearly freaking tell that the last letter is a frikin p. sorry if i offened anybody but like how could they say the hottest man of that era was dead? lol anyway maybe it is because he is my fav idk lol

i ain't saying my name what you crazy?
in STRAWBERRY FEILDS! idk how to spell fields lol

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 | 08:05 PM

cram it papadave nobody cares what you think! leave paul aloneif you don't have anything nice to say then SHUT UP!
gee people these days lol

BTW: I hear Ringo also has a last testament revealing the truth also. Hafta wait for that one.

Esme

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 | 05:35 PM

Please spend more money on that trash.

1245
in atlantis the lost city

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 | 10:59 AM

he his alive

the BEBEBEATLES
in NONE OF YA BUISNESS

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 | 09:54 PM

GUYS U R IDIOTS HOW IS PAUL DEAD. HE PERFORMED ON SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE THE OTHER NIGHT. AND +(plus)
IF HE GOT INTO A CAR CRASH ANYONE CAN SURVIVE IT!!!
LIKE!!! THINK A LITTLE PEOPLE!!!

the BEBEBEATLES
in NONE OF YA BUISNESS

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 | 09:59 PM

YOU PEOPLE ARE IDIOTS HE IS NOT DEAD! HE PERFORMED ON SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE THE OTHER NIGHT AND RUST ME IT WAS NOT A LOOK-A-LIKE1! AND + (plus) IF HE GOT INTO A CAR CRASH WHO SAYS YOU CAN'T SURVIVE ONE!!! AND THAT'S A GOOD IDEA TO MAKE CLUES LIKE THAT BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BUY THE ALBUM TO SEE IF ANYTHING LIKE THAT IS IN IT.

P.S.

he is NOT DEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JPMisALIVE
in Tennessee

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 | 01:04 AM

As seen in the most legit argument called "Paul McCartney is really dead." (a documentary showing "clues" on albums covers etc) it says that George Harrison left a recording on a mini audio cassette player while on his death bed explaining the supposed accident and how they hid it along with those "clues". It also says that the government agreed to the transformation of a stranger to replace Paul to "avoid hysteria". If one of the four men were to reveal the secret, all of them were to be assassinated. But.. Oh, look. We are still blessed to have PAUL MCCARTNEY and Ringo Starr. An obvious fraud, proven by a contradiction.