Well, I know psychology from all around the world... sure slapping a mechanism unknown patch on something also in those seeking to study and
understand what is occurring also taken as unknown? Is an attempt at "Normalcy" a known impossible derivative every mind is not a 98.6 in degrees of
knowledge or understanding.

Did the OP say she was unstable in anyway shape or form? No. He said in her line of work and interest which is encountering this sort of thing as an
unknown variable. Unknown as to the what in Western Psychiatry; yet known in the Eastern.

Can such a thing become dangerous? Sure; in one thing: Attachment.

All mental concepts and grasping is contact with phenomena; the labels are not the phenomena... just a placeholder of a known construct as an X. Such
is the nature of "one dimensional" thinking in a world that is always 3 dimensional despite undulations and quantum entanglements... the Y and Z are
left out.

The Y and Z are the research... yet snapping fingers or setting an alarm brings many out of what appears as a reality just as real on waking.

Attachment to this mental internal/external construct by name and label builds these internal and external constructs as a reality as existent, they
are not in any essence real except in collusion or communication as existent.

So close your eyes as a small child and crawl... no pain not nothing just ambulation or movement coming into contact. Who discerns this contact as
this that or the other? Those already attached to that as a reality. But that is the dream or pseudo reality that causes all mental illness the
conceptual ladder and the groping at it some try to find connections and rungs that exist and can see that others declare do not.

So who is wrong? This very question is exactly why Jehovah witnesses or peer reviewed research exists. The conspiracy or illusion of is this the real
life? Or reality in general?

In functioning in that conceptual ladder called knowledge? Yes. But in life itself? Such nonsense is not required for anything or everything to go
on... typically such a state is known as death. In some traditions? It is known as transcendence or stepping out of the conceptual ladder of the two
trees by stopping grasping, once enough is known to live. Then what needs to be said is simply said... out of the grove in which the Buddha attained
enlightenment? The first he ran across asked him what he was... he said awake. Meaning not asleep just acting according to nature... it is assumed he
was a human meeting another human... he could have been a bird meeting another bird, a snake meeting another snake etc etc who would know and who
would not?

Those grasping at the conceptual ladder as reality and as the only tangible existence to understand and know? Are defined very one thing:
Ignorance.

If you claim it again from this post? Then I clearly can understand why; even if you cannot.

Did he say she called the police? Entered a state of panic or anything else? No.

Leave her alone, I know a spiritualist lady that is about to crest into triple digits in age... this sort of thing has been in her life from early on.
She is often sought as a wise old sage and has made a decent living just as such.

If any Western psychiatry wants to call her insane? She would likely die of laughter.

Coping mechanisms... this fellows GF is coping and he caring about her? Reached out for those experienced in such things.

I have over 26 years in this sort of thing in direct experience as well as pulling a friend that has a level of education in psychology/psychiatry
that he could teach it(was going to be his career/still could be)... off the couch that wanted to lay there and die. He went to his dad's house one
day, ignoring everything wouldn't shower, wouldn't shave, didn't want to eat. Distraught his dad called me... I went there, no drugs, no patches and
had him off the couch and back to himself within a couple of hours. He has been doing great ever since.

This woman in question? Seems to have it together. The fellow asking/OP however? May not.

OP does this sort of thing disturb you? Would you want someone that is more conventional than unconventional? If she can live with a skeptic then it
will work, you can you live with who she is? That will work too.

However if such a thing bothers you? Then know that the real problem in the situation? Is yours not hers.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.