Saturday, January 5, 2013

Jason Burack is at Wall St For Main St.
He discusses
(1) The currency wars remind him of what happened in the 1920′s.
(2) How gold is manipulated and how it isn’t a conspiracy theory.
(3) The Japanese ponzi scheme.

from FinancialSurvivalNetArch Crawford
joined us today and consulted his technical and celestial charts, in an
effort to try to understand the road ahead. He believes that 2013 will
be a challenging year (who’d thunk it) with no clear investment trends.
Gold and silver are uncertain in the near future but should break-out
much higher later in the year. The US Dollar is looking okay in the
intermediate term, mainly due to weakness in the other world currencies.
The stock markets look ready for a major decline and yesterday’s 300
point advance on very low volume seems like confirmation. We’ll revisit
Arch in the months ahead and check the accuracy of his predictions.Click Here to Listen to the Audio

traderdannorcini.blogspot.com / By Dan Norcini /
In
yesterday’s post I mentioned to not put too much into a single day’s
price action as hedge funds are allocating money into various markets
and yanking it out of others to start off the New Year.
The result
so far has seen gold giving back all of its gains from yesterday, plus
some, with silver surrendering nearly all of its gains as I write this.
Silver looked shaky to me yesterday given the fact that the other base
metals were so strong. In that environment, it should not have faded 50
cents off its best level of the session.
Even copper is
surrendering some of its sharp increase from yesterday along with
palladium, which is getting smacked. Platinum however is going the other
way and that is up.
Don’t forget that we are now in an age in which the word “SUBTLE” is unknown amongst the giant hedge funds.
They
come crashing into and flying out of markets in the blink of an eye
(check that – faster than that thanks to their algos) with very little
regard if any to the disturbances that their buying and selling create
in the markets in which they decide to play. This positioning is going
to continue into tomorrow but maybe by the time the dust settles on the
trading floors at the close we will have a better indication as to what
to expect the start of the first FULL week of trading next Sunday
evening/Monday morning.READ MORE

kingworldnews.com / December 31, 2012
Today
John Embry told King World News that he believes that the price of
silver will go ballistic in 2013. He also spoke about what to expect in
other key markets in 2013. Here is what Embry, who is chief investment
strategist at Sprott Asset Management, had to say: “There have been a
few periods in the past when people (investors) got detached, but this
one is probably the worst in the sense that we’ve never had monetary
creation like we are having (now). It has no place to go. It’s not
getting into the real economy.”
John Embry continues:
“So
it’s (the liquidity is) being forced into financial assets. That is
leading this disconnect between the real world and the prices of
financial assets. I don’t know how this is going to be resolved, but I
suspect negatively in the sense that at some point people are going to
flee these things, particularly bonds, because they don’t represent any
value whatsoever….READ MORE

A few years ago, I heard the story of a money manager who, at his fund's annual meeting, renounced one of his best investments.

The stock had risen dramatically, and as a result, his investors were
pleased. The problem, he said, was that his analysis was all wrong. He
had thought the stock would double on the back of three particular
strategies. He ignored a fourth, believing it would be negligible. Of
course it was the fourth that went gangbusters and propelled the
business and the stock straight up.

I've never heard a story like that before or sinceThis
story stuck with me because it was so unusual. Our human tendency is to
believe any good outcome is because of our skill, and any bad outcome
because of bad luck. As a result, we neither account for luck nor
analyze the results to improve our skills -- both of which can undermine
our investing.

In The Success Equation,
Michael Mouboussin, chief investment strategist at Legg Mason Capital
Management and an adjunct professor of finance at Columbia Business
School, makes a strong argument that the failure to distinguish between
luck and skill -- and create strategies that account for both -- leads
to poor decision-making.

Investing is a complicated blend of luck and skill,
and no one will earn a perfect score. Over time, though, even small
initial differences in returns can have a large effect on your
portfolio. Here are three lessons from Mouboussin that can improve your
decision-making -- and your portfolio.

Focus on the long termWhen luck plays a large
role in a given activity, it takes many iterations of the activity for
skill to show itself in the results.

Take poker, for example. The distribution of the cards is random, and
you can't predict who will win each hand. Over many hands, however,
you'd expect the better players to win more often. Chess, on the other,
involves no luck at all. It's reasonable to predict that the better
player will win each game.
The movements of stock prices on any given day are driven by millions
of individual decisions to buy and sell. Despite headlines purporting
to tell us why the market moved up or down, there's no way to tell why
each investor decided to buy or sell that particular security at that
particular moment. Cause and effect are beyond murky.

Over the course of a year, however, both the individual decisions and
the market fluctuations smooth out, and it's easier to point to broader
causes. While randomness never quite exits the scene, the longer you're
in, the more your skill has time to show.

As Benjamin Graham said, "In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run it is a weighing machine."

Develop (and use!) a strong processOur brains
are economical, and we like to spend the least amount of brain power
possible for any given decision. This works well in situations that are
predictable and stable, but not so well in situations that are
complicated and hard to predict. While relying on guts, rules of thumb,
and quick analyses can get you some wins in the market (remember luck!),
they aren't likely to give you a winning record over time.

Process will.

Creating a robust process you follow each time you invest or evaluate
an investment will improve your skills by forcing you to slow down and
think through your decision.

In addition, regularly analyzing your results -- writing down what
you thought would happen and comparing it to what actually happened --
will improve your process. Over time, the feedback loop of improved
process and improved skills will result in a better overall portfolio.

Account for luckWe're narrative creatures;
there's evidence that one whole hemisphere of our brains spends its time
stitching together the story of our experience. Narrative, however,
presumes cause and effect, when in fact there were multiple possible
outcomes.

Take my dogs. Every day, the mail carrier walks up to the mailbox
attached to the railing of my porch and delivers the mail. Every day, my
dogs bark their fool heads off until the mail carrier moves along to
the next house.

You know, and I know, that the mail carrier moves along to the next
house because that's what happens in delivering the mail. My dogs, on
the other hand, seem to believe that it's their barking that convinces
the mail carrier to "back off the territory, man." And so, no matter how
many times it happens, they bark. Because they think it works.

You do the same thing when you attribute wins to skill alone and
losses to bad luck. Recognizing the ways luck has affected your outcomes
will help you zero in on which assumptions accurately predict gains and
which only seem to predict gains.

Recognizing the effects of luck can also help you develop strategies
for building a portfolio that's diversified enough to not get taken down
with one bad call, but concentrated enough that wins can make a real
difference.

The bottom lineMouboussin's book isn't
perfect, of course. He has a tendency to repeat himself, and he'd like
us average people to spend more time on actual statistical analysis that
seems likely or reasonable.
But his larger point -- about accounting for luck in our
decision-making -- is a crucial one for any investor who wants to beat
the market over time.