Menu

Silver Spoon Nastiness

Pointless nastiness towards strangers is otherworldly for most people whose heads are properly screwed on. Whilst within relationships of some sort one might engage in it to settle scores, with no ax to grind it’s quite bizarre.

To give an example (which sounds like a caricature but is real), years ago, when I was part of the cleaning team servicing the headquarters of an oil company, I had a very odd – almost amusing – experience with a social ladder climber; one of their executives. This woman, from her cosy position, high salary and what not, would take the time to complain almost daily, seeking to get us (minimum wage workers) into as much shit as possible. She would take note of every imperfection and even set traps for us to make mistakes. In one of their boardrooms, she drew attention to the fact that from a different angle, with the sunlight hitting the table differently, she could (barely) notice a stain on it. Another time – it amazes me she never damaged her spine – she contorted her back to look under the urn, which was attached to the wall, to notice a few minuscule coffee stains. This nasty piece of work didn’t even feel ridiculous being the only one in the building to constantly moan. This went on for months. She probably still does it now, if she still works there.

It didn’t matter to her that she could get someone fired over her petty grievances. Some financially secure people have that particularity of not understanding the effects of their actions on the lives of others. It’s me, me, me, all the way.

A simple look at the monotonous landscape of today’s most famous social justice warriors shows they generally have an economically privileged background. Not privileged in every sense, obviously – the best privilege in the world is having someone explain to you, as you grow up, how the world really works, so you don’t end up thinking you’re saving it by cross-dressing. In fact, I’ve noticed a few other similarities:

They are mostly women;

They are mostly young;

They are attendants or former attendants of posh schools and universities, preferably with degrees in gender studies;

They suffer from some mutation of Marxism.

The typical modus operandi of these packs groups is going after someone’s reputation for a controversial statement, as inconsequential as it may be, preferably by descending en masse on their workplace – preferably online, as they don’t have to leave their comfort zone and everything remains impersonal enough; they can feel like victorious knights without ever leaving their armchairs. A lot of them don’t even use their own words, but only “like” or “support” such actions. I click, therefore I am.

Listing the cases of them damaging careers (without remorse) would amount to an archive as thick as an old phone book. They target anyone, from students with a different view to people who have taken unprecedented steps in science. Their callousness, accurately described on this blog with plenty despicable details, can hardly be associated with modern day principles and implicitly with human rights. It’s a tribunal held inside an asylum; it’s anti-bullying activists bullying people until they crack. The fact that they don’t realise the paradox means their intelligence is below sea level.

The luxury of mainly operating with abstractions in one’s everyday life means said everyday life is not too challenging in its basic aspects; one can become disconnected with reality in the raw form others experience it – particularly with online activism, which allows people to harm others from a distance, based on ideological disputes. If they were to consider the practical implications of their actions (people going on welfare, not finding new jobs, not making their mortgages and having to give up their homes, their families’ level of comfort decreasing overnight, their mental health declining etc) they might be more empathetic – or some might, anyway.

Yet being mind slaves to abstract concepts and labels, they seem all too detached, or at least confused. Here you can read an article about how acceptable it is to reveal people’s identities online as a bullying tactic, written for a feminist readership, presumably. It excuses doxxing… as an equitable answer to the horrible act of being doxxed. Or threatened (even when the threat is hardly plausible, as previous examples demonstrate). A few comments are somewhat out of this world in terms of not grasping the concept of a person’s life being severely affected by another’s ego and “principles”.

Compared to their ways, even Satanism is superior in terms of morality. No, seriously.

“11. When walking in open territory, bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop. If he does not stop, destroy him.”

Unlike satanists, who at least employ some prudence, these people go straight for the jugular; they move to the ”destroy” phase straight away. Even blatant, shameless lying is employed as a tactic to stand up for morality, for instance by falsely claiming copyright violations to get completely original videos taken down by YouTube because of political views.

When even the church of Satan shows more kindness to other human beings than social justice warriors, you know something is seriously wrong.

Post navigation

10 thoughts on “Silver Spoon Nastiness”

It seems to me to, Maria, that some SJW’s, high up on the social ladder, casting about for something or someone to be offended by, personally or by proxy, focus way too much on gender ‘imbalance’.

They seem to be clueless about real crushing issues of wage disparity, vanishing jobs, minimum wage and the like. I have my own stories about minimum wage jobs I had and the lack of respect I received, not from men — but from other women.

You can bet that the woman who worked for the oil company, as well as some of the sweethearts all of us have had to endure, while having the life beaten out of us on minimum wage, wereare radical feminists.

Also, started reading about ‘rape culture,’ a couple of months ago, quite worried that universities in my country had degraded to the point that earnest female students were being dragged off the streets and gang banged in frat houses.

I was astonished that the definition of rape (in the minds of sjw’s) has extended to a dating couple who get drunk together and end up naked, in bed, the following morning. The fact that no struggle has taken place, no resistance is remembered, is apparently immaterial. The fact that the girl could not give informed consent, because she was drunk, makes it rape.

Gender this, gender that. I am so f’g sick of it. Common sense should dictate that getting falling down drunk might expose the sjw to worse hazards than ending up in bed with their boyfriend. Being run over by a car, choking on their own vomit, for starters.

Yes, the so-called rape culture (which somehow fails to discuss some countries in the east…) is out of this world, and I fully agree with those arguing it’s nonsense, as the west is the most respectful (even fearful) of women nowadays.

Drunken sex with the boyfriend or husband cannot be considered rape; it’s crazy. Is it on a basis of “what if I actually said no…?” They can’t remember anyway, but what is more likely?

You just described the serial false accuser and completely worthless human being Peru from psychopathfree almost perfectly – born with every advantage in life and thinks it is oppressed.

Despite claiming to be a socialist, this middle aged baby sitter can only talk about how wealthy her friends and social circle are. They all live in stately homes and so on. I recall one conversation with her in which she said that she respected Jackson McKenzie (Peace) because he comes from a wealthy New England old money family and then 45 mins latter called me a ‘Dublin Gutter Snipe’.

This article could not be any more perfect in your appraisal of these things.

That is such a horrible thing to say and only speaks about the person saying it.

There seems to be something about these people. It’s hard to feel sorry for them although psychology claims they must be very insecure to cling to these details. Maybe they don’t realise how quick money and status can come and go. And it’s so funny that they claim to be socialists as socialism is all about deposing the rich of their wealth and power. They probably embrace it just because it’s the trend of the moment; if society was religious they would jump on that bandwagon right away. Or any bandwagon.

It’s difficult to understand where they’re coming from; what they actually think. For me it’s impossible to think that someone’s inner world can be that narrow.

Lying seems to come natural to them. A few months ago a guy posting videos on YouTube (making a living from that) was attacked by a rich transsexual activist for his views, this person got some of his videos taken down with a false claim . He/she thought it was a fair thing to do to anybody who didn’t agree with his/her views. It didn’t matter that everyone knew it was a lie. There’s no better way to stand up for the underprivileged than trying to take their only income away. Very moral.

The people from wealthy families that become hardcore activists/socialists tend to be the ones that didn’t have the smarts to go into the family business, they then turn against their parents lifestyle and carry around some serious anger because of it.

There is something odious about those who seek higher social standing or status by claiming to be socialist. It’s a bit of a contradiction. Not that every person who places some value in collectivism should wear a Mao jacket and endure revolutionary struggle sessions — But lionizing wealthy friends, due to their wealth? How gauche, Daaaahhhlings! To be betrayed by two bit frauds, as most of these people are, hurts so much, though the betrayal is a badge of honour.

You reach emotional equilibrium when you realize you are dealing with obsequiousness to power, coupled with viciousness to any perceived assault, wrapped in the thin skin of faux compassion. Life IS a masquerade to this type– a drama, a show, a play, a self-deception.

They enjoy playing games and complaining about things like smudges on boardroom tables, or crying ‘rape,’ when they get it on with their boyfriend, but can’t remember. It’s only the lives of others, after all, and how can that compare to their need for entertainment? Really… we have to keep our perspective. Their drama requirements trump the lives and livelihoods of others.

The SJW probably figures those who find them reprehensible have somehow been duped by ‘the enemy’ or have blinders on. It’s a crazily irrational exercise in solipsism, played out in an echo chamber of fellow histrionic types.

Another example of a manhunt which doesn’t seem to belong in this day and age. A person who prolifically replies with logical arguments to SJW propaganda was targeted by a collective effort to get him fired and even call the police about him. All for having different opinions and expressing them efficiently. Hearing them talk so naturally about how fair this is… well, it’s creepy. Especially since there are so many out there with the same mentality.