What's more concerning is this mornings newsletter. £200k needing to be raised over two months just to put her into storage and 'to survive' seems a huge amount to basically tow her and her bits and pieces from one hanger to another. Are there debts that need paying off?

I'm also wondering just what the 'temporary storage facility' actually comprises. It says 'A hangar is essential for protecting XH558 from the weather and providing an environment for maintenance to RAF standards.' and 'At the end of January, she will be towed out and placed under cover in storage' without saying just what that under cover storage actually comprises. The word 'hanger' only seems to be applied to the present home, and a yet-to-be-built interim hanger.

The letter mentions the £200k includes 'costs associated with finalising plans for the new, purpose-built hangar' - is that the interim hanger? Or the ETNA hanger? What are the likely costs of building the interim hanger? If the tours and events are to cease until the interim hanger is up and running will that hanger have to be funded totally through donations?

Logged

Rick Steer

I agree - I felt a mixture of anger and disbelief when I received the e-mail yesterday. I feel so sorry for those that have been made redundant. Just where has it all gone so wrong? Why was a lease extension not negotiated on our current hanger when we stopped flying?

I'm really disappointed to be honest. we have had no public fast taxi runs as we were promised, and now we have now secure home either. I have to ask if Doncaster really is the right place for her in the future? £200K is a massive amount to raise for an essentially static airframe that no-one is going to be able to visit or see for the foreseeable future.

Although unpalatable to most, has the time come to re-assess Doncaster? Is there even the remotest possibility of securing approval for a one off ferry flight to a home which is more accommodating of public visits and fast taxi runs? 2 obvious candidates are already being mentioned all over social media. I know it is racking up the past, but I honestly fear for her future if we stay at Doncaster.....I just cannot see how we can afford to proceed on the basis of the sums being talked about - we now only have 8 paid employees, so just what is £200K going to be spent on? There need to be a lot more transparency in my opinion

Sorry to sound pessimistic, but to me this feels like the beginning of the end.....

Agree with both of the above posts, not sure what to think other than shock, anger and disappointment. My heart goes out to those who have lost their jobs after spending so much time and effort in keeping her in the tip top shape that she is in, social media is rife with crap, claims and counter claims...I do not pretend to be an expert in these matters but at the time was surprised that Doncaster was chosen as her final resting place. To me it just seems that all the promises from the Airport owners are being reneged on and XH558 is being held hostage to ransom as she cannot fly out.

Happy to be put in my place and my fears put to rest by those that know better.

Rick Steer

Thanks for that information - I thought the requirements for a one-off ferry flight were somewhat different to a full permit to fly. I believe additional restrictions can be put in place as a condition to ferry - for example, keep undercarriage locked down, bypass populated areas with pre-agreed flight path etc.

Given she has been kept serviceable, I would be hopeful this could be arranged. To me it is very obvious that, for whatever reason, Doncaster is not working out in the way anyone hoped or expected, and so drastic action is needed to safeguard her future, and get ourselves back on an even keel. Funding for a hanger will presumably be a similar cost wherever it is built, so that is not a barrier either....

If we are all serious about her long term future now is the time to take action and secure "the peoples aircraft" for those who have given so much (all of us included) over the years, rather than being hidden away and slowly rotting, unloved and uncared for.

I also personally think (aka controversial statement ahead) there is more value to retaining the services of our brilliant engineering staff than the part time efforts of those at the top of the organisation that have failed in their efforts to deliver what was promised......why are they not going freelance/ donating their services free of charge given the crisis we are now in?

Disappointed, shocked, sad, angry, frustrated. These are all sentiments I am also feeling right now.

I'm sad for those who have lost their positions. Angry and frustrated that the Trust did not see the writing on the wall before committing the jet to a less than secure future. I mean storage? what's that all about? Throw a tarpaulin over her or what? Yes we'll have the carefully crafted FAQ's on Friday but I don't think I'll be impressed.

The public MUST have access to this, the people's aircraft and for that to happen, every effort must be made to get 558 out of Doncaster. I foresee a fate just like XM603 at Woodford if not. All the bluster about keeping her in flying condition with monthly engine runs etc. will only have been effective if a 1-off ferry flight could be made.

The Trust's ambitious plans seem to have totally floundered through lack of commercial funding; we cannot be asked to stump up £200k on the hope that the situation will be resolved.

I don't think a Vulcan can be reverse engineered into moveable bits to go anywhere by road - a friend of mine who was on "Crash & Smash" at Abingdon says they only cut them up.

Rick Steer

I just don't see us being able to raise £200K, and even if we do, that doesn't appear anywhere near enough to build a new hanger, so I still don't understand what that money will be used for....presumably the same unknown place that the rest of the funds have gone up to now?

So many questions that we all want answered, but very doubtful that any will get asked or replied to..Sad, devastated for those that have lost their jobs after so faithfully looking after her..To be honest it bloody STINKS!!!

Logged

That huge triangle against the sky like some monstrous angel trailing dark clouds of glory

So many questions that we all want answered, but very doubtful that any will get asked or replied to..Sad, devastated for those that have lost their jobs after so faithfully looking after her..To be honest it bloody STINKS!!!

Well said Dee!!!!Wonder if the Trust would be available for a question and answer session?? And would they tell us the truth?? I think not but they would still ask for our cash to pay their wages..............Totally gutted for 558 and for the lads who lovingly looked after her so we could be privileged to see her grace our skies time and time again.This is NOT the right retirement home for the old girl - we need to be proactive and do what we can to get her out of there. If anyone has any ideas or thoughts of who we need to approach or what we can do to help the old girl please feel free to pm myself or Dee.558 has been a massive part of my life, given me so much joy and so many lovely new friends that I feel I must try to help her retire where she is wanted and accessible to all........

Rant over - gutted, pi$$ed off, emotional, angry and so, so sad at how this is all ending

Logged

Rick Steer

"The trustees may call general meetings and, on the requisition of members pursuant to the provisions of the Act, shall forthwith proceed to convene and extraordinary general meeting for a date not later than 8 weeks after the receipt of the requisition."

As I understand it all paid up Founding Guardians are members, and therefore can request an extraordinary meeting by writing to the chairman of trustees, John Sharman. The registered address is