There is another difference that the “Five” didn’t mention. Sandra Fluke went on her own free will in front of Congress and demanded that Taxpayers pay for her contraceptives (which makes her what Rush Limbaugh says she is even though we are not allowed to say it) while Rachel was minding her own business until that knucklehead Smith decided to Assault her.

Sandra Fluke is my new girlfriend. I am thinking after I get back from cashing my fat check from OFA, we will have some guilt-free sex and use as many tax payer provided contraceptives as we want! HAHA

Isn’t there an illogical disconnect to desiring to be free to do whatever one wishes while expecting “someone else” to pay? That’s dependency, not freedom. Oh, I forgot. We don’t need no stinkin’ logic.

That is an exchange of liberty for submission with benefits. We do this implicitly when we are young and vulnerable. We do this explicitly — because we reject equal rights — when we become adults.

Obama and Fluke represent progressive involuntary exploitation, denigration of individual dignity, and devaluation of human life. In short, they appeal to people with dreams of instant gratification without perceived consequences. That’s why they promote normalization of dysfunctional behaviors (most notable elective abortion, homosexual behavior), from which follows reduced productivity (economic and natural), and a million illegal aliens to displace Americans while maintaining an illusion of a viable society.

That shows you the extent of the corruption of the American news media: when Jews in high positions in the news media sell out (and sell out their families and friends) to the likes of Al Sharpton. we’re beyond the tipping point. It’s time to write-off the mainstream news and broadcast media in America, and simply accept them as corrupt, and look to other sources for your news and entertainment.

Remember, Sharpton is the agitator who caused three days of riots in NYC, pitting blacks against orthodox Jews, resulting in Sharpton’s rioters killing of a Jew dead in the street. This malignant clown is very closely tied to Barack Obama. You can count on their being on ‘standby’ for the November election.

Yeah, but in truth Buchanan had a long career on TV playing the token conservative on MSNBC… or a parody of a conservative, really. Granted, there are real liberals on Fox like Kirsten Powers and Juan Williams.

“As many have already uncovered Sandra Fluke she is, in reality, a 30 year old long time liberal activist who enrolled at Georgetown with the express purpose of fighting for the school to pay for students’ birth control. She has been pushing for mandated coverage of contraceptives at Georgetown for at least three years according to the Washington Post.

“However, as I discovered today, birth control is not all that Ms. Fluke believes private health insurance must cover. She also, apparently, believes that it is discrimination deserving of legal action if “gender reassignment” surgeries are not covered by employer provided health insurance.

Point: YOU DON’T KNOW SANDRA, and this is not a “fluke”. Her background; parentage; wealth; GLBT goals, etc. are HIDDEN by O’Bastard’s camp. SEARCH OUT THE FACTS FROM RELIABLE SOURCES AND YOU WILL SEE SHE HAS A DOUBLE AGENDA: 1) ALL ABORTION RIGHTS + 2) GAY, LESBIAN, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER ADVOCACY–all at GOVERNMENT (i.e. OUR) EXPENSE.

She’s in career mode. In her mind if Obobo wins she’s set for life. If not, she’ll use all this to pad her resume. Good luck to whichever firm eventually pays her health insurance. From what I’ve seen she’ll get them lots of unwanted attention but not much in the way of billables.

She was a seasoned hack before she even applied to Georgetown. Seriously: she was a “reproductive rights activist” who deliberately chose Georgetown in order to sue them into providing free contraceptives (and abortions?) in their health insurance plan. Even though contraceptives are incredibly cheap (a 90-day script for birth control pills is $11 at Walmart).

Honestly though, I really don’t think Sandra Fluke needs to worry about contraceptives anyway (if you know what I mean, and I think you do).

My only fear is that we are reaching the tipping point where the “feeders” out number the “builders.” Once that occurs, we’re finished as a world influence and our standard of living will descend into an ever tightening spiral.

That’s why is is critical to ensure that the anointed one is evicted along with the democrat controlled Senate in November.

According to the latest Rasmussen poll, victory just might be possible..

Pick another nym and make your point about the current post without going after dead people. Mrs. Soptic had cancer, she didn’t choose to have it and doubtless both she and her husband would have preferred a different outcome.

Mind you, I think the ad filmed by Mr. Soptic is despicable, and it’s especially galling to see the Obama campaign lie about how they knew Mr. Soptic. The whole situation stinks like yesterday’s diapers.

The only problem I see is if anyone asked Rachel if she wanted to be a part of the political debate beyond her involuntary induction via Adam Smith. It might be that she is pretty much what she is and does not want to be drawn into the cultural wars and certainly does not want to become a Palin like target of the left.

They should write a script for Rachel, and have her do a fake “testimony before Congress”, with the phony setting and all. That’s what they did to push the Fluke “testimony”.

Sandra was rejected when they tried to have her testify in committee, due to her lack of qualification. So Democrats staged the event and called it a testimony before Congress, when it was really just Sandra spreading her propaganda on C-Span, made to look like official testimony. What a bunch of liars.

Most of us had already made that connection and thought it so obvious we left it unspoken, but you are correct. A few folks finding their way to this blog might not understand that particular dynamic. It does take all kinds.

Best comments and argument in the discussion is the fact that Fluke was a created propaganda situation. Rachael was attacked again as another propaganda attempt but it backfired. One a shill in a con, the other reality of the left.