I agree with you Elliott....i think...the opportunities Paul George has...is
better than Hayward...and there wasnt a deron williams who would bully him with
a bullet pass on the court...and a so-called coach who is more inclined to
playing overrated vets rather than develop young talent...If the Jazz committed
to Hayward, Favors, Kanter and Burks...we would have a foundation already for
the future...and who knows they could have a strong chemistry that builds by
playing off each other...that would have been the better choice...

Elliott S.Provo, UT

Jan. 26, 2013 3:41 p.m.

CTJ, you're right that Paul George wouldn't make the All-Star team
this year had we drafted him, but it's because he wouldn't be getting
the minutes. Marvin Williams and Randy Foye would still be siphoning off 52
minutes a game because the vets play over the young guys no matter what. Who
knows? Maybe Gordon would have had a shot at the team this year if we gave him
the opportunity, but opportunities aren't what the Jazz stand for these
days. They just do the safest possible thing and hope that fans keep buying
tickets.

CTJ fanSalt Lake City, UT

Jan. 25, 2013 9:20 p.m.

Paul George would look good in our line up right now. I love Hayward, but I
wonder if we made the right move here. Of course if George was playing for the
Jazz he wouldn't be an all star right now. Not too many teams get the shaft
more than the Jazz. Watching ESPN and others we are the least talked about
playoff team out of the lot. In fact many non playoff teams get more pub than
the Jazz. The favoritism in this league is ridiculous and it starts with the
referees.