Assume an Earth-like or super-Earth terrestrial planet in a state comparable to Precambrian or Archaen Earth. The atmosphere is mainly nitrogen and carbon dioxide, perhaps some methane, but very little to no free oxygen. CHON(PS) life has evolved and struggled, but that's about to change: something has evolved to make use of all that CO$_2$. With a twist.

What biological process(es) would explain why these upstarts take atmospheric CO$_2$ and retain the oxygen rather than release it to the atmosphere? To be clear, I'm proposing the Great Oxygenation Event be inverted, with a net loss of oxygen as it somehow is incorporated into organisms and then, over geologic time, sequestered as carbon was on Earth.

Presumably there needs to be some evolutionary advantage to keeping the oxygen rather than pumping it out as a waste product, but I'm not sure what that would be.

The solution needn't be an alternative to photosynthesis as we know it, it just can't result in oxygen waste. A case might be made for carbon monoxide or other oxidized waste, with the organism retaining a single oxygen molecule from the reaction, as long as the effect is cumulative.

I have not specified that this planet has water oceans – if an alternative such as ammonia helps, then assume that is true even if unlikely.

Similarly, if adjusting the crust, atmosphere (other than the composition mentioned), temperature, or parent star in some way helps, assume it.

If this results in a Medea situation, turning the planet hostile to the organism(s) consuming the carbon dioxide and resulting in their extinction, so be it – as long as all that oxygen ends up locked away.

This is my first hard-science question, so if I've contradicted myself or overlooked something that makes answering impossible, point it out. This question appears to be related, but is not a duplicate.

This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.

$\begingroup$Oxygen is not hard to get rid of quite the opposite. If oxygen is not actively produced it will react with most metals and wind up depleted on it's own. It's one of the reasons we hope to look for free oxygen in exo-planets as a sign of life. I know this dosn't answer your question, but that's why its a comment.$\endgroup$
– ArtisticPhoenixFeb 2 '18 at 6:08

$\begingroup$I'm aware of natural oxygen sinks like iron and methane, but I'm looking for a scenario where free oxygen could be organically produced but is locked away instead.$\endgroup$
– rekFeb 2 '18 at 16:36

$\begingroup$Biologically produced oxygen had been continuously locked away for hundreds of million years (check the timeline of Great Oxygenation Event). It was finally the combined effects of photosynthesis, carbon burial and exhaustion of natural oxygen sinks (like iron) that led to oxygenation. You need to tweak your planet just a little bit to postpone oxygenation for another billion years, or even indefinitely.$\endgroup$
– AlexanderFeb 2 '18 at 18:18

2 Answers
2

Clearly, your planet has iron to burn!

The best analog for something that might happen is something that has already happened. The early Earth itself was covered in iron- Fe (II), to be precise. This caused a huge delay in the oxygen level increase. For about a billion years post-photosynthesis evolution, oxygen levels stayed low because the free oxygen being produced was essentially rusting the crust of the Earth. This is the source of the beautiful banded iron formations from the Precambrian Era.

[...] the energy derived from the oxidation of ferrous iron could serve as the sole support for the growth of a CO$_2$-assimilating microorganism

Sound familiar? I think it sounds a lot like what you're looking for to corrupt your Earth. This figure shows the chemistry involved- note that the O$_2$ is being taken up along with ferrous iron to produce energy (ATP & NADH) and water:

Some caveats

This chemistry only works under very acidic conditions. Fortunately, the early oceans were already quite acidic and with an atmosphere that's mainly CO$_2$ that'll get pushed even lower. Additionally, these bacteria are able to create their own pockets of acidic pH- one experiment saw them get as low as 0.5 units in culture. That's terrifying.

Also, I'm not sure how well this would actually sequester the oxygen. Assuming deep sea export, the iron oxide can be stashed for billions of years, but at a relatively slow rate.

Other options

If you don't like Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, there are two others that may be worth considering. Mariprofundus ferrooxydans is a common microbe at deep-sea vents, but operates at a neutral pH and doubles quite readily. It's so weird that it's currently in its own class (the Zetaproteobacteria) within the Proteobacteria phylum. The other option is the essentially magical Rhodopseudomonas palustris, which is both phototrophic and Fe(II) oxidizing. It also functions at near-neutral pH and is a decent candidate for an early life form in the Archaean oceans. There are others that do similar things, but R. palustris is my personal favorite.

$\begingroup$My chemistry is not as good as my biology but if the oxydized iron is heated in the presense of carbon monoxide it will reduce into metallic iron. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_reduced_iron Can we produce a environmental cycle where carbon monoxide is produced and the iron oxide is then reduced back to metallic iron$\endgroup$
– P ChapmanFeb 2 '18 at 17:42

The simplest answer to this is that the plants that conduct photosynthesis to generate O2 and Carbohydrates for their own use only generate sufficient quantities for their own metabolic processes.

Plants use O2 and CHO compounds just like animals do, for exothermic reactions that release energy they can use. Photosynthesis is an endothermic reaction designed to use energy (in the case of plants, sunlight) to reverse this reaction on grounds that there is no available O2 and CHO compounds for them to consume. On Earth, the plants just keep releasing this extra O2 as a 'waste' gas, because storing it for future use is corrosive and serves no purpose given that the plant can produce more than is needed at any given time.

If the Earth was further away from the sun, say on the edge of the habitable zone, AND there was a metabolic regulation system built into the plants so that when they had sufficient O2 and CHO Compounds they could suspend their photosynthetic processes (perhaps storing small amounts of O2 for night time and the like) then the great oxygenation event essentially wouldn't have happened.

There may be some loose O2 in the air (released perhaps by a dying plant when it's short term store is exposed to the atmosphere) but generally speaking, plants would have only produced what they needed.

This in turn would of course mean that your planet could only possibly support plant life; no animals.