If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Since I noticed this trend, I am appalled by its pervasiveness. At least half of the women I see are wearing jeans.

Jeans are a fitting feminist symbol. They are farmworkers' and miners' clothes. Feminism is an invention of the central bankers who also created and financed the socialist and communist movements as bait to control people through government (which they control.)

By wearing jeans, women are signalling loyalty to this drab unisex proletarian vision, where women work like men, look like men, and fornicate like men (i.e. dogs.)

Can it be any more obvious? If the sexes dress alike, it is because they are becoming alike.

Often I see married couples clad in blue denim, him and hers. Occasionally there is an eldest daughter already promised to the cult of androgyny.

The first time this article appeared, I got a storm of criticism from women who say jeans can be feminine. Yes, if you are incredibly sexy in the first place, (but you'd look good in anything.) Ladies, jeans (and pants in general) emphasize the caboose. Very few women should do this.

Men, a woman wearing jeans is a red flag that you might be dealing with "GID" --"gender identity disorder." Her jeans are saying: "I don't want to be a woman. I don't want to look good for men. I fear and distrust men. I want male prerogatives. I want to look like a man. I want to be a man."

Feminism which espoused "women's rights" actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.

Young women were told they were rebelling against oppressive patriarchy and inequality and all things bad. They never imagined they were betrayed by feminist teachers and politicians, intent on breaking up the family and abandoning us to State and corporate control.

They never imagined that the "women's movement" was inspired and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation as part of their ongoing social engineering program. Google "Women's Studies" and "Rockefeller Foundation" and you'll get 93,000 hits. Do you really think the world's biggest monopoly capitalists, who fund Planned Parenthood, birth control and eugenic research, don't have an ulterior motive for feminism?

The Rockefellers are central bankers. In the words of insider Carroll Quigley, their ultimate goal is "nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled ...by the central banks...acting in concert." ( Tragedy and Hope, 324)

Under the guise of defending homosexual rights, heterosexuals are under ruthless and hateful psychological attack in the mass media and from government. In the UK, Australia and California, the terms "mom and dad" have been banned from schools and children are encouraged to experiment with homosexuality. They want us to be homosexual in the sense that gays usually have sex but don't marry and have families. They want to destroy the family because lonely confused people are easier to manipulate. This is the real story behind the "sexual revolution."

There is a Stalinist feminist stigma against looking feminine. Hopefully the popularity of "Mad Men" and the beauty of Don Draper's wife Betty wearing summer dresses will bring feminine attire back.

Truly liberated women can make a statement by wearing a skirt or dress. They can show they aren't afraid of men, and may actually like them. Christine, a Toronto woman, does this and gets a very positive response:

"Several years ago, I gave up dressing like a man for religious reasons (and no, I am not a Muslim, although it is rather peculiar to see Muslim women in blue jeans and head scarves.) Since the traditional garb of a Western woman is a skirt or dress... I try to wear that. And I do try to dress neatly. When I made this decision, I didn't think about how it would affect men. Nevertheless, its effect on men has been most touching. It brings out the best in them and they seem to like it. Some are even vocal in their approval; only one has said he disapproved."

Men should politely voice approval and support of women who are dressed in a feminine way.

There is nothing more beautiful than a women wearing a summer dress. I can still remember a young woman I saw five years ago wearing a frock. That's how powerful femininity is. Let's not let highly-paid pious feminist and lesbian "change agents" destroy it. It's time for real women to relegate jeans to garden work.

<sigh....> THIS is end of the world stuff, and the demise of Gourmet magazine is questioned???

It must be nice to be a mod. :p

My thread has direct connections to commies, the NWO, and central banking (no doubt controlled by the Jooooos!). Plus, there is a subtle you'll-burn-in-Hell flavor to it. Your thread was about the demise of a cupcake magazine. :p

My thread has direct connections to commies, the NWO, and central banking (no doubt controlled by the Jooooos!). Plus, there is a subtle you'll-burn-in-Hell flavor to it. Your thread was about the demise of a cupcake magazine. :p

Umm can't this website stick to its CONSERVATIVE values and ban the posting of lewd or
obscene photos? Can't we leave this junk to the liberals? I'm sure there are a lot of Christians on this forum...I don't think they'd like seeing pictures of halfnaked girls pop up in the discussion, especially if they have kids in the room
etc.

Umm can't this website stick to its CONSERVATIVE values and ban the posting of lewd or
obscene photos? Can't we leave this junk to the liberals? I'm sure there are a lot of Christians on this forum...I don't think they'd like seeing pictures of halfnaked girls pop up in the discussion, especially if they have kids in the room
etc.

Please let's be the decent underground forum!

Oh, you ARE new here, aren't you? :p

"Today, [the American voter] chooses his rulers as he buys bootleg whiskey, never knowing precisely what he is getting, only certain that it is not what it pretends to be." - H.L. Mencken

Umm can't this website stick to its CONSERVATIVE values and ban the posting of lewd or
obscene photos? Can't we leave this junk to the liberals? I'm sure there are a lot of Christians on this forum...I don't think they'd like seeing pictures of halfnaked girls pop up in the discussion, especially if they have kids in the room
etc.

Please let's be the decent underground forum!

What you saw posted is about at the outer limits of what our Forum rules allow. One of the guys involved in that little Daisy Dukes conversation is actually a pretty strong Christian and both of them are conservative.

You'll find that CU is fairly strict on the nekkid pic/profanity thing. We don't bar every curse word and every pinup pic but they do have to be on point in some manner. ;)