Flight 253 eyewitness Kurt Haskell has astoundingly
revealed how the FBI are deliberately hiding the existence of a second
man who was arrested following the Christmas Day plane bombing incident
after bomb-sniffing dogs detected a possible second explosive device in
his luggage.

Appearing on The Alex Jones Show yesterday, Haskell
related how after being allowed to disembark from the plane by
officials, passengers were detained in customs with their carry-on
luggage for six hours while they waited to be interrogated by the FBI.

Bomb sniffing dogs then detected a possible explosive
device in the luggage of an Indian man around 30 years old before the
man was arrested and led away to an interrogation room.

The probability that there was a bomb in the man’s
luggage was all but confirmed when the FBI moved the passengers to
another location. “You’re being moved,” the FBI told them, “it is not
safe here. I’m sure you all saw what happened and can read between the
lines and why you’re being moved.”

The identity of the second man has not been discussed
by authorities or the media and Haskell’s description of his own
interview with the FBI suggests that the feds are deliberately trying
to bury the notion that the bomber had one or more accomplices.

The FBI was not pleased with Haskell when they conducted a follow-up interview yesterday in Michigan. They showed him close-up
photographs of various people, including Mutallab, the accused bomber.
“They kind of tried to trick me,” Haskell explained. The agents tried
to pass off two photos of Mutallab as different people. Kurt asked the
agents if they were attempting to impeach his story and smear him.

The Indian man was not included in the photographs. Neither was
another Indian man who Haskell told the media had helped the bomber
board the plane despite the fact that he had no passport. The sharp
dressed Indian lied about the bomber’s circumstances, claiming he was a
Sudanese refugee.

Haskell asked them why he was not shown a full body shot of the
suspect. Haskell was eight rows back from the suspect. The FBI agents
did not answer and were displeased with the question. He also asked the
FBI agents if it would be more appropriate to bring the surveillance
video from the Amsterdam airport instead of still photos. “I don’t
think they liked that comment from me,” Haskell added. The FBI said
they did not have the videotape. They also made a point to tell Haskell
they were asking the questions and not him.

The agents showed Haskell a photograph of the man flagged by the
bomb-sniffing dog and taken into custody in customs. “Isn’t this the
man who had the bomb in his carry-on bag that you arrested in customs
who you refuse to admit exists?” Haskell asked the agents. “They really
didn’t like that comment from me and had no comment back to me but I
said it sure looks like the man you refuse to admit exists.”

There has also been no official explanation as to the identity of
another mysterious man seen calmly filming the entire flight, including
the botched bombing attempt, with a video camera.

Haskell described the FBI’s handling of the aftermath
of the incident as “a complete embarrassment, a total disorganizational
mess that actually put us in more jeopardy than we were already in.”

Passengers were told to remain seated in the aircraft
for 20 minutes after landing despite the fact security did not know at
that point if there was an explosive on the plane or if the fire
started by the suspect Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab while on descent to
the airport had spread under the floor in the cabin or to the fuel
tanks in the wings.