Monday, 3 November 2014

I solve a mystery for Fred Reed

I'm sure that many of you read Fred Reed. Understandably, as Fred is a fine writer, experienced and highly intelligent. Having spent many years as a police reporter his take on the black undertow is searing and unsparing. Which explains why in this article he despairs at the degree of power wielded by such an undeserving and small minority.

"It is curious that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity, should dominate national politics. Yet they do. Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or can’t do. Blacks control what you can say to your own children in your own home.""Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress, rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as must be examinations for promotion in fire departments, the military, and police forces. Blacks must be admitted to universities for which they are not remotely qualified, where departments of Black Studies must be established to please them. Corporate work forces, federal departments, and elite high-schools must be judged not on whether they perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of blacks. Obama was elected because he was black: an equally unqualified and negligible white pol would have had no chance. He is now fiercely pushing the most profound transformation of America ever attempted, by opening the floodgates to immigration from the south."Isn't that powerful stuff?He ends despairingly with "things that ought to be unbelievable, and once were, have become routine."And my God, that is the truth.But the article, excellent though it is, suffers from an extraordinary omission. You see Fred metaphorically throws his hands in the air in complete bafflement at the fundamental question of how 'the unbelievable has become routine'. In fact the explanation is there as plain as a pikestaff .......for anyone who wants to see it. You see Fred, all of this unbelievable stuff becoming routine didn't just happen, or happen overnight. The situation that had prevailed in the former Confederacy States (and in reality most of the others as well) until about the middle of the last century was the natural order whereby a low intelligence, violent and largely indolent racial minority were kept at arms length from Whites, miscegenation carried punitive social repercussions and indulgence of their lawless and violent nature guaranteed swift and severe retribution.Similar dispensations have applied throughout the world since the dawn of man, simply reflecting the natural order. And you defy the natural order at your peril..... as most White Americans of the time understood at the deepest visceral level. So how then did blacks come to rule over us and the unbelievable become routine? It was one hell of a project and arguably one that had never been successfully undertaken before. It was multi-faceted and required a carefully co-ordinated set of self-reinforcing measures developed by a specialised Project TeamFirst item on the plan was 'Civil Rights' for blacks which set out with a number of seemingly reasonable proposals (who could object to nice Mrs. Parks moving up the bus?) but had as its ultimate objective the rendering of blacks impervious to criticism and judged on different criteria. Towards this end the Project Team set up a number of key implementation bodies such as the NAACP and ACLU, fronted by a few token blacks for the optics. So now blacks could go anywhere and any time. Problem was of course that the closer blacks got to Whites the less Whites came to like them. Which then gave rise to the most audacious element of all: The creation, a la Orwell, of a parallel universe, one where fact was fiction, war was peace. And black was white.Thus academia developed bogus 'equality' theories of race, gender and culture, rewrote history to downplay the civilisational role of Whites and to overplay their alleged genocide and exploitation of the noble savages. Full spectrum media output reinforced these theories. Thus blacks had to be presented as intelligent, kind, honest....and horribly done down by Evil Whitey. The ultimate target was the White Male, the embodiment of The Enemy. He had to be traduced, belittled, discriminated against through Affirmative Action, impoverished in marriage, emasculated by feminism, ultimately reduced to a hollowed-out husk ashamed of what he was and what his ancestors had been. But that still wasn't enough. The screaming cognitive dissonance needed legislative enforcement to repel reality. Hence the introduction of a battery of 'hate' and 'anti-discrimination' laws aimed exclusively at Whites and enforced by politicised activist Federal judges.So Fred, that's really how the blacks came to power. The achievement of inducing the greatest civilisation the world has seen to destroy itself may appear magical (just like this guy). But when the Project Team control the media, 'entertainment' industry, finance and academia and have had centuries, nay milennia, to hone their repertoire of destruction maybe it's not so amazing. Anyway Fred, that's the mystery solved for you. But it wasn't really a mystery, was it? I mean, you're really smart, well read and have vast on-the-ground experience, and yet you avoid identifying The Project and the tribe who ran it. Which kind of defeats the whole purpose of your article, doesn't it? A bit like describing the voyage of the Titanic without mentioning the incident with the iceberg. No Fred, the shades, leather jackets, cigars and constant reminders of your 'fearless' and 'scurrilous' writings don't cut it as long as you step away from the Third Rail.

A South African chap calls in (around the 2 hour mark?)and explains the reality of life for Whites in some parts of SA and how Pastorius probably did think there were some nigger savages behind the door that night, and how its best to shoot first and ask questions later, if you don't want to end up tortured by these creatures.

Recommended Highly .

Hellstorm: The Documentary

The world deserves to know about the rape, torture, and mass murder of Germans during and after WWII

Exposing The Truth

Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 by Thomas Goodrich is a book that shocked the world with its factual and eye-witness accounts of the atrocities committed against the German people toward the end of WWII and following their defeat. As the victors wrote the history following the devastating conflict, most people know nothing about:

The deliberate mass murder of German civilians by Allied FirebombingThe ethnic cleansing of Germans from their ancestral homelandsThe death camps where millions of German Prisoners of War were murdered through starvation and exposureThe state-sponsored rape of millions of German females, from 8 years old to 80 years old

And other atrocities committed by the Allied forces against the German nation

And now Kyle Hunt is working with Thomas Goodrich to turn Hellstorm into a documentary film like nothing you have seen before. It’s time to set the record straight. It’s time for the truth

You can help in the making of this monumental film. Big Hollywood studios spend billions of dollars to produce propaganda filled with lies about the German people, and though we do not have their kind of money, we can work wonders on a shoestring budget. It would be great if you could:

Contribute to the project, helping to cover production and distribution costs.Help us to build excitement about this fundraising projectSpread the word to family and friends

The inner vitiation and ethical gelding of the White Northwest European races that we see today is not entirely without precedent. The same, or a similar process could be studied in the decline and fall of the Imperium Romanum way back that time. It was not destroyed by invading barbarians exactly; it is more accurate to say that it was vampirised from within to such effect that barbarians COULD destroy it. The emergence of the vampire from the catacombs was what rotted it out from within. The signal difference between then and now was that the barbarians back then were the ancestors of the great European white races who have done so much in the world---but OUR barbarians; ah now, there is food for thought indeed.

Walk into any council building in London and it is like walking into the Apefrican jungle, there are that many nigs. Positive discrimination. Same with shops. Even private sector shops have most security guards as nigs. The irony. A race of dumb crims as the security!

"Virtually everything revolves about what blacks want." Jack Whitehall did a comedy about this. He went to a posh private school. There was one nlack boy. The headmaster would try to get the nig into every photo. Even when the boy didn't like the sport he was in the photo

.One of your very best articles, Sav.I like Fred and read most of his outputs - but like you, I know that below the carefully constructed, curmudgeonly tell-it-as-it-is-and-damn-the-consequences persona, he holds back, and for the reasons you give.Behind the macho image there is a scaredypoo peeking out.As you imply - what's he got to lose?

Ethiopian is finalizing preparations to start three weekly flights to Dublin and Los Angeles in June 2015 using the ultra-modern B787. These flights will be the first direct air connection between Africa and Ireland, and will be critical in enabling increased investment, trade and tourism flows”, said CEO of Ethiopian, Mr. Tewolde Gebremariam.

St Nilus will like this comment from Michael Hoffman, who knows a lot about Jews:

HoffNovember 2, 2014 @ 2:25 amThis is before I woke up to the Jews.

I was told by Jew-wise people that the Jews totally control media. Well, BBC World is the world’s largest TV channel. If the Jews control all media they must control BBC. So I scrutinized BBC World 24/7 for weeks, I really did. And I could not see any Jews. Well, of course there was some obviously Jews, but they didn’t overcrowd the screen.

Then there was this very well known male that had been reading the news for ages on BBC World. He was talking about the Russian oligarchs. Then he ended the story by saying, quote: “They are all Jews.”

He looked extremely surprised, I was too.

Well, he was reading from the screen, the prompter, it was not his own words. If a Goy, a non-Jew, had written that oneliner, he would be fired the same day. The only one that could get away with this is a Jew!

Here the Jew is right in your face telling the world that we the Jews controls BBC World. At least one in ten on earth can watch BBC World.

That Nuthanyahoooo is a “chickenshit” statement is totally BS! Who controls US state department? Short video, 2 min:

Kay Griggs: Zionist Jews Control USA Foreign Policy

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ch__UJaeLYo

Some that some “unknown US official” goyim calls Nutanyahooo a “chickenshit” and can get away with it is total Jewish BS. Only a Jew can say that and get away with it.

What the Jews are doing here is the exact same thing the BBC prompter Jew did, they are telling the whole world: We the jews rule America and we can fool you stupid Goyim around as we please.

Like Fred, many of us had no idea that our conditioning since birth had been designed for the very purpose of preventing us from naming the Jews as the primary authors of our destruction. They could not do it without White traitors though.

I think Fred will come to understand. What will remain then, is whether he thinks the best way to defeat them is by open declaration of intent or by deception.

My mum watched a documentary about 911 that questioned the official report. I asked her if they mentioned the tower that fell because it was hit by nothing. Of course it wasn't. Oh, and I notice in the Express article on the first new replacement tower that comments are disabled.

Now why would they do that hmm? Can't let the goyim know the truth. And that's probably the position Fred is in re the Holyhoax and the Jewish enemy of the White west. They are very good at it. But I am sure UN will provide Fred with a link to this article ;-)

Also, very glad to see the Hellstorm documentary fund surpass it's target so quickly!

Was this the Toure who got jealous because a native French speaker was trying to wind up a Uruguayan on sir Fergie's orders and the Uruguayan responded by ripping the piss out of the French international through sarcasm and the spineless creeps at the FA who knew fa about Spanish banned the Uruguayan for aacism so he got in on the act by claiming racist chanting was done in Mockba which no other player heard and which did not be heard on the affects microphones?

So Fred, that's really how the blacks came to power. The achievement of inducing the greatest civilisation the world has seen to destroy itself may appear magical (just like this guy). But when the Project Team control the media, 'entertainment' industry, finance and academia and have had centuries, nay milennia, to hone their repertoire of destruction maybe it's not so amazing. Anyway Fred, that's the mystery solved for you. But it wasn't really a mystery, was it? I mean, you're really smart, well read and have vast on-the-ground experience, and yet you avoid identifying The Project and the people who ran it. Which kind of defeats the whole purpose of your article, doesn't it? A bit like describing the voyage of the Titanic without mentioning the incident with the iceberg.

No Fred, the shades, leather jackets, cigars and constant reminders of your 'fearless' and 'scurrilous' writings don't cut it as long as you give the Third Rail - the fountainhead of the destruction you deplore - such a wide berth. Come on, you'd do a superb job if you chose to do so. You're needs are modest. What's stopping you?

---------------------------

Sav, you really deserve full marks for this great post, yet I'm going to have to deduct a few points on account of you failing to mention the proper name of this evil entity, aka, Team Jew.

Of course all us regulars here knew immediately who you are referring to, but please think of the children, the newbies that turn up! And please think of Fred Reed who might read your post, scratch his crotch to relieve the phantom pain of missing balls and say to himself, WTF, is this Irish guy talking about.

Fred of course knows of the jewish role, yet, as you nicely put it, refuses to identify the jewish Captain and crew deliberately aiming the ship of State known as Western Civilization towards the icebergs.

As to why he doesn't name the elephant in the bridge, despite decades of seeing it, smelling it, and stepping in its dung, I can likely conclude it's because it's simply good for Fred, not to do so.

katana, in fairness the children in question would want to be very dull indeed not to infer the identity of the culprits. As you know I've never been shy about 'naming the Jew' but in this post was actually kind of playing a game similar that of Fred. If you get my draft.

The brainwashing runs deep. Remember that the US elections are a secret ballot. It isn't just appearing to believe ziopropagabda AKA Political Correctness. Yes, most Whites didn't vote for Obongo, but ENOUGH of them did to give him office. IOW if Whites had voted as a bloc, we'd be nowhere near where we are now.

PS Can anyone imagine Moochelle making it to a community college let alone frigging Princeton w/o massive AA andYKW special treatment. She looks exactly like the loud pushy garden negress you see outside any fried chicken store in a ghetto.

This video was apparently put together by our friend Orion. It is quite well done, and shows definitively that there is a comprehensive agenda within Jew-run Hollywood to demonize and mock White males.

You may have heard about the famous Supreme Court case of Brown v Board of Education in which the Court declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional.Not many people know that the case was brought by blacks who simply wanted more money for their schools under the doctrine of "separate but equal." They had no intention of being integrated into white schools, and probably no desire to be either. If you were black, why would you prefer to be taught by white teachers and go to a school where the majority of pupils are foreign and hostile? But the cause of forced integration was unilaterally taken up by the court. How is that for activist judges?

Libyan troops based in Britain accused of committing series of sex attacks.

Libyan soldiers training in the UK have been sent home early following allegations of a series of sex attacks.More than 300 members of the country's armed forces have been based at Bassingbourn Barracks in Cambridgeshire since July as part of the UK's pledge to support the Libyan government.The latest group had been due to return to their homeland at the end of the month but their stay has been cut short after five soldiers were accused of sex attacks.

A takeover squad was ordered to run Tower Hamlets today after a bombshell report found the council flouted spending rules over millions of pounds in grants and property sales.

Cabinet minister Eric Pickles branded it a “rotten borough” and told MPs there was evidence of “cronyism” and a risk of “corruption”.

In a blow to controversial mayor Lutfur Rahman, who seized control in 2010, a three-man team of commissioners will move into his headquarters. The commissioners will take over the power to give grants and must approve property sales and senior council officer appointments or suspensions.

The £1 million report by PwC auditors found what Mr Pickles called a “worrying pattern of divisive community politics and alleged mismanagement of public money by the mayoral administration”.

Yeah, intelligent Fred, accurately describes the upside down, ass backwards world we are forced to live in. He can describe very cleverly the improbable antics of blacks who openly hate Whites, act the violent fool with impunity but still receive gratuitous praise by so many grovelling Whites as though they actually had legitimate grievances. But Fred makes sure he satisfies the powers-that-be by insulting and expressing expected contempt towards that paragon of evil and arch enemy of the jews, Adolph Hitler, at every opportunity in his diatribes. One would assume someone who routinely writes politically incorrect articles on social dysfunction should see the colossal elephant in the room, but does he? Do likewise, Sean Hannity, or Bill O'Reilly really know, considering those extremely generous jews all around them showering them with riches, accolades, and prestige? It does seem unlikely to those like us, that intelligent Fred, or perhaps the extremely unsavory characters I mentioned, doesn't know what we've all come to understand. But do they? Frankly, I'm disgusted, either way. Either cowardice and greed, or yes, intelligent but suffering from a severe case of cognative dissonance.

These "fearless" writers will never breathe a word about anti-Whitism, with its goal of White Genocide, even if it bits them in the ass. Their "fearlessness" goes chicken shit when they think about what will happen to their career for treading such forbidden ground.

@21.55. Undoubtedly true, but why with Fred Reed. As far as I know he lives in very modest surroundings on a military pension. His living costs down there in Mexico are minimal, he says so all the time.

I'm reading through the superb "AmaBhulu: Birth and Death of the Second America" by Boer scientist exile Harry Booyens (it's a history of South Africa which ties in his own experience and that of his ancestors), and it seems like racial utopianism has long been a characteristic of Anglo-Saxon elites. The way they continuously sided (even up to the present day) with the dark races of South Africa against the Afrikaaners, which was disastrous for the latter when under British Imperial rule.

news shall be as accurate and as comprehensive as is practicable and be presented fairly;

Which nujplains why the story about three enrichers was wiped from the webs(h)ite and the story of the Bray Wanderers footballer getting a sentence suspended for 2 years along with 2 other enrichers never made the paper of iTunes downloads at all.

I'll try to address that, if you don't mind Savant. By the way I very much enjoy the articles you write and many times get a good laugh. ;)

Why does anyone look the other way when they are confronted face to face with the mountains of evidence that jews control our societies and are responsible for their rapidly spiraling declines? No matter how much evidence they are confronted with, and it's not rocket science, they still won't acknowledge the truth of it. I have a rather successful business friend in Philadelphia, where there are many blacks, and many jews. He complains quite a bit about blacks (he hates them, but who wouldn't?) but when I make the obvious connection of jews in relation to black empowerment, and jew control of just about everything else, I get blank stares and silence, and soon -- he has to go. Sometimes, these discussions have become quite heated in his denial that jews are the problem. Though I believe he's learned much from our discussions, I don't think I've made much headway on the jewish question. He knows me well, for many, many years, and I offer the information in good faith, and yet he refuses accept this. I don't think he'll ever concede that it is the jews.

Many people just don't want to know. They aren't truthseekers, which to be, is of paramount importance. Though I don't know it to be a fact, I believe my friend has many jewish friends and acquaintances, admires jews for their wealth, competes with them, and would rather keep those relationships than accept the truth. He's thoroughly judaized. Maybe Fred has the same problem as my friend. Commenters above suggested Fred has mentioned jews in articles but played down the jewish role, even leaving the impression that the jewish problem is overblown and really not worth talking about. WHAT??!!! On top of that some of his articles are published on a jews (Unz Report) website. He could forget that particular association and any other if he were to acknowledge jew perfidy and mayhem. I'm not much impressed by individuals or sites that complain about blacks. You'd have to be deaf, dumb, and blind not to know blacks are a major problem for White societies, but this bewilderment of how they have this power doesn't say much for one's analytical skills. This is the result of lifelong jew indoctrination. Mr. Reed is said to be highly intelligent. But, for waking up to the jewish question, it doesn't matter how smart an individual is. If that were the case, a majority of Whites would understand exactly what's going on and who's behind it, but as it stands, we're a pretty small group. What's important is how much a person values the absolute truth.

John Dicario, thanks for that input. I basically agree with what you say but would make a distinction between a person 'out there' primarily focused on making a better living and those who take a systemic view on issues like the current one.

I have a confession to make .... I had the same views as your friend, even up to the point when I started writing this blog. The difference is that, taking a systemic view of things under guidance from some readers and peeled back the various layers until the full horror became clear.

I too struggled with the 'I just can't go there' syndrome, as did your friend. It's easier to turn away, especially if you have many Jewish friends and associates.

The best thing to do is not hit them all at once. Just drop in a thought-provoking observation. One I use is to innocently ask 'why did the Germans not shoot the Jews in situ instead of incurring the massive overheads in terms of rolling stock, fuel and manpower just to kill them in concentration camps?

"One thing he (Jared Taylor) categorically is not is anti-Jewish. I have known a few serious anti-Semites. They are obsessive, constantly launching into the dammed Jews this, and the Jews that, and who do the Jews think they are, etc. Jared does not. This is not surprising. He is a proponent of white European civilization, to which Jews have been major contributors.

So there you have it! Two reasonably intelligent men who don't recognize the obvious trail leading back to the collective and influential clan. Even Henry Makow, a Canadian jew is "to boldly go where no (jew) has gone before". Having been a police reporter, Fred should have learned something about retrieving copious amounts of evidence laying about in plain sight.

Let's say for argument's sake, that the jews were not the top dog in the pecking order, but complicit in the upper-most tiers of the echelon. Well, why not address them from that respect instead of an all-out perfunctory dismissal of the obvious evidence?

Immigrants are always the best of the best, whichever country they come from.

(That makes one shudder to think what base creatures swarm in the ird wirld.)

I've met lots of dumb Chinese in NZ tho, and there are plenty here.

On the whole though, they are not as naïve as whites, but plenty of them are and are just as brainwashed as the stupidest liberal.

Jarod was drawn into discussing the damage Zionists and leftist Jews have done and did make it clear he understands the problem, and later tried to retract his statements. The video was on here a while back, anyone got the link?

I think he is attacking the problem from a different angle. He is not anti-white, so give him a break.

We will see more of these. Islam is kosher as it gets, ignore the BS about Israel. Israel may be sacrificed (it's Jewish population always seems to hover around that magic number 6 million), but that won't stop the diaspora carrying on as before, or better than before actually.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmGRshS0PAw&feature=youtu..be

If Islam is so bad, why don't we just get rid of it? The answer: it doesn't have a chance unless it's allowed to. If the west put its mind to it (say WW2 style), Islam would be "gone in 60 seconds".

But that's not the plan is it? Islam is purposely being strengthened until its just strong enough to do what it was designed for and nothing more.

OTOH, many top Jews are purposefully pushing Islam because it will destroy the White race, and Jews have traditionally been very comfortable within the caliphate, regardless of what that retarded troll used to say on here...

Sure the homo jews will go, but the orthodox don't care for them in any case.

Albert Pike's 3 world wars letter makes more and more sense every day.

http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm

It's not really known if the letter was real or not, but it's certainly interesting. Savant, please unban the genius so we can know what to think about it, thanks.

22;30 here in chicago tuesday nite the polls closed and it looks likie a republican win in all states.thanks nigger boy Barrack you sure did the Repblicans a favor with your fucked up policies and by sending the other niugger Holder down to Missouribravo sir you da man.John old rtd chicago copper.

Savant, that's the same confession we would all have to make. We were all in that position where we awoke to our conclusions pertaining to jewish conduct. Then the basic question became whether we could live with the lie or not. Whether we should warn those we know and ultimately put a stop to this deliberate destruction of our beloved countries and societies.

Once I realized the truth, and had the tools to search for more wherever it took me, I was compelled to learn and find out more and more and that process still goes on today years later. Once you know, you can't go back. That is the method of a truthseeker.

I wanted to tell everyone what I had figured out. The obvious, terrible, evidence is there, and easy to find. But, to my surprise, no one wanted to know. Few will read anything. If you pester them, they will 'click' you. Unlike you, Savant, a truthseeker, they want no part of peeling back the layers necessary because they are too selfish and cowardly to view the horror or even discuss it.

There's safety in ignorance for Mr. Reed. These folks, intelligent or not, aren't even curious about the truth, no matter the truthteller's method of instruction -- big steps or little. They are only interested in what the jewsmedia indoctrinated, self-deluded, herd would buy which, of course, is not much truth at all.

John Dicarlo (like your avatar!) I see the problem as being two-fold. First most people are simply not interested enough. Most people and by a large margin.

Then we have normalcy bias. A strong majority of people become uncomfortable when faced with facts that contravene their existing understanding. When this relates to a taboo subject like jews it resembles pushing a rock up a hill.

Then again, I read somewhere that all it takes is about 10% of a given population to awaken in order to activate the rest.

Yes, yes, Heraclitus, all true, and many other reasons too lengthy to post.

We're just left with the task of spreading our message wherever we can until it sinks in to enough people.

Just five or six years ago there was very little information on this topic on the internet, but now, it's huge. It's everywhere! The jews and their malicious perfidy has never been so exposed in history.

The jews themselves will help to expose themselves because they are at a point where the destructions they reap will lead those Whites directly affected by their destructive programs to wake up to the fact that it is jews behind all the trickery and nation wrecking.

I love numbers like 120 Billion; they trip off the tongue (or keyboard) like . . . like something we are actually capable of comprehending. Which we are not. Which is why they are so regularly tripped-out at us.

A report by University College London – not generally considered a hot-bed of racist, bigoted, right-wing fascist extremism – has come up with that figure - in £s - as being the cost of welcoming all those hordes of culturally enriching Non-EU migrants to our Country since 1995.

I've made a blog post on this issue of Fred Reed and his silence re the jews (see link below).

This is an important issue as this sort of silence about jewish power and criminality is unfortunately the norm across the board among writers and opinion formers. It needs to end.

-------------------------------------

Opinions on Fred Reed Not Naming the … Jew

Contents

Introduction

I solve a mystery for Fred Reed by Irish Savant

Letters About Jews – In Search Of Conspiracy by Fred Reed

Jared Taylor and Fred Reed by Streicher’s Ghost

Fred Reed and Me by Paul Gottfried

“American Renaissance: Racists or Diagnosticians?” by Fred Reed

Reading Reed by Fred Reed, correspondents, and A. Linder

What makes Freedy run by JC at VNN

Fred Reed and Me Who Are These Jokers Kidding? by Richard Hartmann

Letter to jew Gottfried by Chris Conole

Fred Reed, Paul Gottfried and Me by John “Birdman” Bryant

Version History

Introduction

The following compilation of opinions on the topic of Fred Reed “not naming the jew” has been prompted by a recent blog post at Irish Savant, titled, “I solve a mystery for Fred Reed”. [1]

For over 10 years now Fred has written a satirical, non-politically correct column at his website Fred On Everything. [2] So far there are over 620 columns that deal with all the myriad ills that inflict American society with an emphasis on race, crime, religion, education and all other such related issues that crosses Fred’s radar.

All except one.

Yes, the jewish problem, question, issue, elephant in the room, etc.

As Savant wrote, it’s a bit like talking about the Titanic without mentioning that “iceberg incident”. For those who have woken up to the central role of jews in the ongoing destruction of White societies, Fred’s “hear, see, say no evil” on the jews is inexcusable.

In a 2004 column Fred does deal head on with the jewish issue and explains why he doesn’t mention jews. [3]

That column and responses to it from various websites are given here for the readers’ consideration.

My own take is that Fred, surely by now, is aware of the central and negative jewish role in what’s happening to our societies.

And yet he remains silent.

Needless to say, he’s doing a tremendous disservice to his readers and his race by not speaking up.

Disgraced former Milton Keynes Mayor gave character references for THREE alleged sex offenders.

Disgraced ex-mayor Subhan Shafiq gave character references for THREE alleged sex offenders applying to become city cabbies, it has been revealed.

According to official council documents seen by the Citizen, Councillor Shafiq vouched for two men accused of sexual offences – as well as giving his backing to rapist Nadeem Kiari.

Police raised concerns with Milton Keynes Council over all three men, but two were not convicted.

Contrary to the documents, Mr Shafiq claims that in one case he only acted as an interpreter.

Councillor Catriona Morris, chairman of Milton Keynes Council’s regulatory committee, claims Mr Shafiq gave a character reference 18 months ago for one suspect immediately after hearing details about the sexual allegations – but his application was refused.

Ms Morris said: “I chaired a meeting where Subhan gave a character reference for another taxi driver.

“My colleagues and I chose not to grant it as we did not believe they were a fit and proper person. It was someone we deemed would not be appropriate for the job as a taxi driver.

“The concerns in the report were about sexual offences. I do not remember the specific details of that case but everyone in that room would have been fully aware of any areas of concern.”

Mr Shafiq resigned as mayor when it emerged he had given a reference to a convicted rapist who successfully applied to become a city taxi driver. Nadeem Ahmed Kiani, who had four convictions for serious sexual offences, went on to work in the city for three years. Mr Shafiq has also worked as a cabbie in the city himself.

This week former Tory councillor Don Hoyle has told how Subhan helped one suspected sex offender appeal to have his licence reissued in 2011. Mr Hoyle, who was on the appeal committee at the time, believes the sexual assault happened while the man in question was working as a taxi driver in Milton Keynes.

He said: “He had apparently driven a girl somewhere and she then accused him of sexually assaulting her, but she was unable to identify him in a parade.

john dicarlo:You are right about that: the jews have never been so exposed before, and none of their antics ever known. As things get worse, people will be more open to accepting the reasons for it because they will want to find out why it's happening. Let's hope it won't be too late to turn the bus around. Personally, I'm not too hopeful.

The Republicans won real big here as folks are tired of the commie, globalist open borders bullshit.

Republicans will take it as a mandate to suppress wages, trash the working/middle class, tax breaks for very rich, loopholes for corporations, and to pursue the globalist/corporatist agenda. Famous Wall Street Journal editorial suggested amendment to the Constitution: "There shall be open borders."

BTW Left's plan to combat climate change: cripple first world economies, tax the North for the South. A foot in the door for serious globalization.

Right's plan to combat climate change: spray shit in the stratosphere to reduce solar radiation (chem trails of recent years were "nozzle tests" for this). Rest assured there will be big money in this and what could go wrong? A foot in the door for serious globalization.

Shaping up as fascism for the global soon to be trillionaire elite.Communism for you and me.

Ive known "Hoff" for years, on the net, via Incogman. It was Hoff that set up "Hofflandia" as a place for disgruntled Incoggers to gather when Julian Lee was heavily promoting "The Pink Swastika". Hoff's cool, he's Swedish /Scandi, and does indeed know a lot about jews, with an emphasis on communism.

Cheers for the link.

Hofflandia | "The JEWs Plan Is to Exterminate the White People ... What Fricking Part Don't YOU Get?"

"Why the Jews Promote Homo Sex – by Hoff If you as one jew can write one law, then 300 million americans must obey that law."

hofflandia.wordpress.com

He's also got a couple of blogs with many,many whole books .

***********UK TV ,late afternoon 5/11/14

QUEST 3pm: "Hitler's Henchmen"

Danitz the Successor: As his REGIME crumbled and he prepared to commit suicide,HITLER appointed Admiral Donitz as his successor.

followed by

"World War 2: The Complete History"

'Why did Britain and France sacrifice Czechoslovakia in an attempt to appease Hitler, and how did the NAAAAZI invasion of Poland provoke all-out war?

MovieMix: 2.35pm "The Diary Of Ann Frank"

'During WW2, a JEWISH family are forced into hiding. Anne, the young daughter, decides to record these harrowing days , and describe her snatch, by means of a detailed diary'Stars Joan Plowright

Yesterday Channel,6pm:

"Nazi Collaborators" 'Historians are divided over Mohammad Amin al-Husayni,Grand Mufti of Jerusalem during WW2. Some say he was unfairly demonised, others point to his ties with FASCIST Europe'

I just had the misfortune to pass by a tv and sky news was on. Their political editor, one Faisal Islam (hmmm...), was busy telling us that EU and non-EU immigrants were all net contributors to the UK Exchequer in the last 10 years. (Because money is all that matters, right?)

In the same period the telescreen presenter also said that UK born citizens were net withdrawers upon the Exchequer.

Isn't that amazing. According to Sky, Brits live entirely at the expense of those wonderfully enriching third worlders!

Amazing!

Amazing these enemy propagandists have not been targeted for their surfeit of kneecaps.

I went to Katana' site and couldn't stomach to read much more than Reed's "letters about jews - in search of conspiracy." What a sickening, total whitewash of what jews do and what jews are. I'm glad I never wasted any time reading this shill and diverter until yesterday. This guy is a great cheerleader for braindead morons who keep mopping up the mess on the floor without ever thinking to repair the gaping hole in the roof. REED WRITES:

"My favorite lunch buddy for a long time was a retired Harvard professor, Jewish, as decent a human being as I have ever met. My favorite dance partner was a Jewish radical feminist (I know, I know, but we liked each other) who was on an undefeated College Bowl team in the Sixties. My dentist was Jewish. The biochemist I used to windsurf with on the Potomac was Jewish. Beth, the pediatrician I dated at NIH, was Jewish, and an absolute sweetheart. I learned the Texas two-step from a Jewish carpenter (no, another carpenter) who moonlighted as a dance instructor. And so on."

Oh, well then, that you know jews, and they've always been swell to you, that exonerates them as nation wreckers and genociders, and exonerates you for not saying anything about them. What's that? Those very pleasant "human beings" never told you they were working as fifth columnists to bring down White societies? I can't imagine why. Could endearing themselves, especially to those with influence do them any good? Would jews do that? No Fred, never! (duh)

And yes, Fred, you're wrong. Jews most certainly are monolithic in their agression toward non-jews. Sure, they're are all over the place -- leading the opposition on all sides. But they stick together as a monolithic tribe against all who would expose them. Jews that have ever come out and actually exposed their own is one of the shortest lists of names you'll ever see. You sure you aren't a jew with your over the top defense of them? Sure, you'll find jews in all sorts of high paying, influential positions, but not due to their credentials unless we're talking about their ethnic persuasion, but due to ubiquitous jew nepotism. Just make a wild guess what group of all the different nationalities that make up the US population have their own liaison office in the White House and at least 25% of the seats in ANY government, regardless of what party is in power?

Apparently, this Fred Reed, is more of a scoundrel than I was initially aware. He loves jews more than he cares for his own kind. Previously, I separated him from the likes of Sean Hannity, and Bill O'Reilly, but now I see he's right up there with the worst of them.

And to the war in Vietnam -- it was just part of the jew agenda. I'd bet it could be proven the Vietnam War came out of the minds of jew Bankers. Any takers? For the purpose of softening America up; introducing rampant drug use in America's young, enabling jew corporations to make huge sums of money, and not to mention causing the deaths and maiming of as many White Americans as possible, just like they did in WW1 and WW2, wars jews had a great deal to do with their inceptions.

At that time, during the Vietnam debacle, jews led both the anti-war movement and communist movement in America. During the 60s and 70s the jews brainwashed anti-war Whites so they might serve many progressive jewish interests and promote multi-culturalism. Like today, the jews were both behind the war and the anti-war movement causing a huge divide in our country aimed especially at dividing the White race.

The subversive jews made the anti-war protesters so unappealing in appearance, race mixing and the liberal agenda that most traditional Americans felt that they had no choice but to support the war. Let me say it again: The jews agenda was and is to divide the White race. And please, don't tell us about the blessings of jew vaccines you POS. Blessing for the jews. That's about it.

It is true here just as it can be proven at Harvard and elite universities in America that Jews actually perform at much less success in their college careers than European American students in the same institutions. For instance, at Harvard in 2010, although Gentile European Americans were fewer students than Jews, European Americans were 5 times as many of the top scholars awarded membership in Phi Beta Kappa.

'Too good to be false: an essay in the folkloreof social science' (Sociological Inquiry 57 (1987), 1-1 1). It is aboutthe assertion that the frequency of lynchings in the American South inthe early part of this century was positively correlated with the priceof cotton, a 'fact' that has frequently been used as a key piece of evidencefor frustration-aggression theory.

Most linguistics departments have an introduction-to-language coursein which students other than linguistics majors can be exposed to atleast something of the mysteries of language and communication:signing apes and dancing bees; wild children and lateralization; logographicwriting and the Rosetta Stone; pit and spit; Sir William Jonesand Professor Henry Higgins; isoglosses and Grimm's Law; Jabberwockyand colorless green ideas; and of course, without fail, theEskimos and their multiple words for snow.Few among us, I'm sure, can say with certainty that we never toldan awestruck sea of upturned sophomore faces about the multitudeof snow descriptors used by these lexically profligate hyperboreannomads, about whom so little information is repeated so often toso many. Linguists have been just as active as schoolteachers orgeneral-knowledge columnists in spreading the entrancing story.What a pity the story i s unredeemed piffle.

The one good thing about that Paki Mayor of Milton Keynes is the reaction from the readers.

But can you beat this from one of them - obviously a Muslim - which says more than 1000 articles. 'Nobody was harmed'. That's right, not harmed except for being raped and sodomised. Reveals all you need to know about these fuckers.

PS: Speaking of honesty, Fred, I have a very special way of guaranteeing that I am honest. Anyone who has a serious criticism of me will get an answer, and if there is any major substance to the criticism, that criticism (and my answer) will be posted on my website. Then my readers can judge for themselves whether I am honest or dishonest, right or wrong, sane or crazy. As far as I know, I am the only website in the world that follows such a policy. So, based on the above policy, I am offering you a chance to embarrass me on my own website. Answer my letter, and I will post it, in however many exchanges of correspondence you want to have. Then we will let the readers decide whether it is you or whether it is I who is honest, or right, or sane. And you don't need to rely on just my readers -- bring your own by informing them of our correspondence. Or post it on your own site. But of course you won't, Fred. You won't because you are fundamentally dishonest. And ignorant. And planning to stay that way.

Fred Reed is joke. I have never understood why people think he is intelligent. His wife is a Mexican. For those of you in Europe who have not been exposed to Mexicans, I will tell you it is a filthy race. Mexicans are savages, the murder rate down there probably surpasses that of most of the worst areas in Africa (70, 000 in the past ten years, usually horrific tortures and beheadings). They kidnap and rape women all of the time. The average Mexican is not much better than a nigger.

I have a question: when people say their strategy is to "Name the Jew," what exactly are they doing to this effect?

Are they going to the Rotherham town council and openly naming "the Jew" as responsible for the immigration policies which have led to the recent sexual exploitation crimes?

Are they going to the universities, standing up in women's studies classes and naming "the Jew" as creator of feminist ideologies which pit women against men?

Or getting on a soapbox in Hyde Park or Central Park or whatever park and naming "the Jew" as behind the current phase of the Decline of the West?

Does "Naming the Jew" mean only tapping away on blogs as opposed to doing anything in the real world?

I do not say this lightly. In America, Willis Carto and Liberty Lobby made a career of "Naming the Jew." And where did that get him? Just about nowhere. Any thoughts on why he failed? (Stipulated, Carto did keep alive certain white racialist politics through the latter 20th century--and good for him. But for all his "Naming the Jew," America is going down the multicultic tubes.)

My point is, we have a long, hard struggle ahead of us if we want to preserve the white race and Western civilization. This struggle is not going to be won by a simple slogan. But maybe I am wrong. I am really interested in what people think they will accomplish by "Naming the Jew."

I hope the Savant is good enough to open up a real discussion on this matter.

@20.08 and Jewish intellectual achievement. I often wondered about this. You see even allowing for their higher intelligence in absolute numbers goyim of the same level intelligence would significantly outnumber them.

D_Shawn. The question of 'Naming the Jew' as I see it revolved around whether we can win the war on the white race without identifying those who originated the attack and continue with it to this day. Agree that those who have done it up to now have disappeared down the plughole. But it does seem counter-intuitive at best not mentioning the enemy you are trying to defeat.

I have a question: when people say their strategy is to "Name the Jew," what exactly are they doing to this effect?

Are they going to the Rotherham town council and openly naming "the Jew" as responsible for the immigration policies which have led to the recent sexual exploitation crimes?

Are they going to the universities, standing up in women's studies classes ...?

Or getting on a soapbox in Hyde Park or Central Park or whatever park ...?

Does "Naming the Jew" mean only tapping away on blogs as opposed to doing anything in the real world?

I do not say this lightly. In America, Willis Carto and Liberty Lobby made a career of "Naming the Jew." And where did that get him? Just about nowhere. …

My point is, we have a long, hard struggle ahead of us if we want to preserve the white race and Western civilization. This struggle is not going to be won by a simple slogan. But maybe I am wrong. I am really interested in what people think they will accomplish by "Naming the Jew."---------------------

A fair enough question, from, I presume, someone new to thinking about all this.

"Naming the jew" has little to do, directly, with good slogans, such as "With jews We Lose". That's just one of the many tactics to draw peoples attention to the source of their troubles caused by organized jewry.

Commenting online, blogging and so on, gives people a world wide audience to educate others that can then lead to real world presence in the street protesting about the Rotherham rapes, feminism teaching women to hate men, and so on. Thought, reason and emotion, comes before action.

People like Willis Carto, Rockwell, Pierce and so on kept the flame alive in a totally controlled media age, and can't be faulted that they didn't ignite a rebellion of the masses against our Hebrew masters who dominated the mindscape of the masses.

"Naming the jew" is about telling the truth about who is really behind our ongoing racial, social, cultural, etc., destruction. It's drawing people's attention to the architects, the ultimate planners and schemers hiding in the shadows behind all this nation wrecking.

Organized jewry has spent several generations now, with their media dominance, filling White heads full of lies, lies and more lies about anything and everything that supports jewish dominance over us.

So naming the jew is very important from a basic, "understanding your enemy" point of view.

The jews are the "brains" behind the war against Whites. They use the masses of jew indoctrinated Whites, jew hate filled blacks and jew extreme Muslims as tools or troops to attack White societies.

If we focus our attention on these "tools" we are not going to the source, the headquarters of our enemy. Going for jew HQ is where we can decapitate the leadership, so to speak, leaving their tools destroyed and leaderless.

Would naming the Jew have brought down communism? probably not, would naming the Jew stop the financial rip off and rape of economies through IMF and "bailout" schemes, again probably not, would naming the Jew have stopped the invasion of Iraq,,(on Purim incidentally), and all the other ME wars the West is involved in again unlikely, but, if they were named constantly and light thrown on their activities even with holocaust deflection would we have gone so far down this road. Would the peoples of Europe, America etc have elected with whatever semblance of democracy we have left Alan Shatter, Jack Straw, Sarkozy et al, people who have worked openly to speed up our destruction.

I met afriend of mine at the airport last week and asked him where he was off to now, as he worked all over the world.“Australia” he saidI said “for how long”“For good, I’m emigrating” he said“Why” I said.He replied “homosexuals a century ago were hung if caught, 50 years ago they were jailed, 30 years ago they were fined, now we have legalised marriage of homosexuals, I’m getting out now before it is made compulsory” !

One of the more effective methods for shaming authority, as in no punishment for gang-raping a minor, is to show up at the home of the judge and protest there. That is always a shocking tactic, scares the perpetrator and is very effective with minimal participation. This is rock solid legal over here because of the First Amendment. Maybe not in Ireland? It really starts to cross the line between protest and coercion and scares the hell out of the subversive establishment.

The only strategy available to you is to curtail immigration by any means necessary, number one. Number two being to insist on effective police protection. Murder is a very definite crime. For virtually all other crimes, you can say this and that, that the natives are just as bad but they aren't being arrested. Law enforcement is harder on minorities and so on. But with murder, the numbers are always reliable. If a group has a 500% murder rate, it has to be dealt with from that reality regardless of all the subversive propaganda. If the government is unwilling or unable to do that, then you have anarchy anyway and it's time to to tear the whole thing down and start over.

In regard to naming the Jew: Nilius, Katana and Uncle Nasty. Agents provocateurs, every one.

Fred Reed is joke. I have never understood why people think he is intelligent. His wife is a Mexican. For those of you in Europe who have not been exposed to Mexicans, I will tell you it is a filthy race. Mexicans are savages, the murder rate down there probably surpasses that of most of the worst areas in Africa (70, 000 in the past ten years, usually horrific tortures and beheadings). They kidnap and rape women all of the time. The average Mexican is not much better than a nigger.

Fred makes his estimates of intelligence based on the capacity to handle technical tasks such as dentistry and optometry. He forgets that these tasks are basically procedures now. Someone at McDonalds can turn out reasonable burgers but they aren't chef material, and outside of the controlled production system probably couldn't make a burger on their own.

Having visited Mexico, I think you are being slightly unfair. Mexico City has its savages, but there are also nice areas full of nice people.

The battle over the 'sexual rights' of underage persons has begun. Children are being sexualized. In the view of the Illuminati, young people are being 'set free'.

Nastiestuncle will get hard thinking about all the great new information kids can learn these days.

Tuesday the U.K. Daily Mail reported that an educational consultant has recommended that sexual intercoursebetween 13-year-olds considered as 'safe and healthy' behaviour; and masturbation and 'consensual kissing' is OK for 9-year-olds."

Maybe NU is the education consultant.

Why wait until they are 9. That's discrimination!

They will tell (force to believe) 13 year olds the following as GREEN behaviours:

"--Interest in erotica / pornography--Consenting oral and/or penetrative sex with others of the same or opposite gender who are of similar age and developmental ability--Obscenities and jokes within the current cultural norm".

So? Don't you like looking at tits.--Nastiestuncle acting as liberal as he possibly can to show how super clever he is.

These people are totally evil, but the average "progressive" wouldn't agree with that of course.

They have Amber and Red behaviours so kids know where they should start and where they need to end up.

They plan is Green for 10 year olds, amber for 15 years old, and once they turn 18 they will all be copying Sasha Grey every night.

Dan @ 3.40, just noticed your question. No the cities of the Roman Empire, especially Rome itself, were not filled with nigs and jigs as such. They were filled from the bottom up by early primitive Christians, Jews "of the freer confession", people who acted as an ethical toxin upon Roman society in a manner much like "progressive" useful idiots act in our society today.

Try going to actual real political meetings, fundraisers, thinktanks, etc and see how easy it is to name the Jew.

You can barely even get the opportunity to call immigration genocide.

Even saying "I know some people who think there might be slightly too much immigration, maybe, kind of, if you look at it from a certain perspective" will get you shunned and shamed.

Theory and practice are so far divorced in the blight wing.

Naming the Jew makes you a nut in many eyes. Maybe Fred is acting as the gateway drug for people who will inevitably find out about the Jews anyway once they go down that path. We need gateway people too, you know. Perhaps Fred is dumb, as often people with opinions on everything are. I don't really care that much.

The Christian Church in about 300 to 400 AD actually stopped the population decline in Europe by shunning birth control and encouraging big families. The population in the Roman Empire was veritably crashing at the time.

The Catholics were definitely not anti-white at that time. Things may be changing now however.

The Christian Church in about 300 to 400 AD actually stopped the population decline in Europe by shunning birth control and encouraging big families. The population in the Roman Empire was veritably crashing at the time.

What were the popular and effective birth control methods in use in the 4th century?

ad anonymous at 1.29This is just too stupid. 300-400 AD Christianity had nothing to do with what it became 1500 years later. It was a silly jew cult, slowly becoming aware of the possibility of milking the Europeans.Indeed Ludendorff had it right.

Fellows, look; the subterranean Christianity of the catacombs was indeed a subversive cult which acted in a subversive way. Over centuries the form remained the same, i.e. it continued to be called Christian, but the content radically changed. It became, eventually, something to be subverted, which is what we see today.

Like doing anything out of the ordinary in life you need to use good judgement and plain old commonsense. Crying out, "It's the damn Jooos!!!" in a crowded synagogue is not one of those things.

If, "Naming the jew" is causing people to consider you a nut, then you're doing it wrong! You need to be knowledgeable about what you are talking about and again use good judgement and strategies in social situations. Removing the swastika armband also has been known to help, when around liberals.

"Maybe Fred is acting as the gateway drug for people who will inevitably find out about the Jews anyway once they go down that path."------------------No doubt, but it also goes the other way in that his strong support of jews can influence many readers to also dismiss the idea that jews are the central problem. It not that Fred just doesn't mention jews, he has come out supporting them as if they are the greatest thing since tacos and Tequila. If Fred got religion and was to expose jews, he would do far greater good than just telling us that niggers are bad news and the government is corrupt, etc.

"We need gateway people too, you know. Perhaps Fred is dumb, as often people with opinions on everything are. I don't really care that much."---------------------Honest gateway people are simply people who don't know any better. They are genuinely unaware. Those that do know the score, yet persist, are better described as gatekeepers, blocking people from learning further.

Fred is not "dumb" as his writings show wit, nuance and awareness of the psychological workings of society. I think a charitable view of Fred is that he's a cynic that knows that since it doesn't pay to name the jew, it might pay to praise the jew. Or being even more charitable maybe Fred is just honestly clueless, as he is of a generation that been fully indoctrinated with the jew spew. But, …

Uncle Nasty is oddly silent. I would have thought he would be lending support for Fred. He usually tells others to actually donate to this fraud. UN worships the group Fred walks on. 6 November 2014 15:39

Esther said...

Calling Uncle Nasty, calling Uncle Nasty.... 6 November 2014 16:26

BJKahn12 said...That is correct about Uncle Nasty. Anyone who shows even a smidgen of tolerance towards da Jooz is abused from a height. But remarkably silent about Fred.

7 November 2014 00:11

------------------------

Uncle Nasty is fully jew-wise. Absorb that fact for a while.

Perhaps he hasn't read Fred's 2004 article where he performs fellatio on jews. I don't know.

What is clear from UN's comments on this blog is his love of of the satirical, cutting observations of society. This is what one finds on Fred Reed's blog, although without mention of the jew plague.

I've taken UN's promotion of Fred simply as a promotion of him in terms of being a satirical informational gateway that potentially leads to the jew, regardless of Fred's true position on jews.

Lots of non-elite Jews who are much more hated by minorities, especially you know who, than other whites. Also easier to differentiate them on the street from other whites. It makes them more of a target because they are thought of as being more physically frail and less likely to fight back. The Irish guy, for example, could easily be a cop.

I was fishing the other night..Weds?..and randomly flicked over to BBC Radio 4skin.

Within literally a minute :

"Germany: Memories of a Nation":

" Holocaust, jews, concentration camps, Buchenvwald, Auschwitz, 6 million dead, interview with rabbi 1, interview with rabbi 2, how jews are just wonderful and enrich everywhere they go, did wonders for Germany", etc

Later on, some whining about the "plight" of transexuals in...Iran.

ALL THE MEDIA IS WEAPONISED.

A SPADE IS NO LONGER JUST A SPADE.

BBC radio 4skin, Wed Nov 5th 2014:

Pro JEW, pro QUEER, pro FEMINIST, anti-Iran...:

09:00"Midweek" Libby Purves meets the QUEER Rev Richard Coles :

"The Reverend Richard Coles is a parish priest in Northamptonshire and presenter of BBC Radio 4's Saturday Live. He was also half of the eighties pop duo the Communards with Jimmy Somerville. In his memoir he reveals his journey from a rock-and-roll life of sex and drugs to a life devoted to God and Christianity. Fathomless Riches - or How I went from Pop to Pulpit is published by (JEW) Weidenfeld And Nicolson."

09:45"Germany: Memories of a Nation": The New German Jews

Neil MacGregor discusses why Germany has the fastest-growing Jewish population in Europe.

"After concentration camps like Buchenwald and extermination camps like Auschwitz, it seemed that the story of Jews in Germany must come to a full stop at the end of the war. Why would any Jew in 1945, or in 1965 for that matter, see any part of their future in Germany? But remarkably Germany today has the fastest-growing Jewish population in Western Europe.

Neil MacGregor visits a synagogue in Offenbach, near Frankfurt, which was inaugurated in 1956 and has been greatly enlarged in the years since then."

10:00"Woman's Hour"

'Ghoncheh Ghavami is a 25-year-old woman with joint British and Iranian citizenship. In June, she went to see a volleyball match in Tehran, but was arrested because women are banned from watching live men’s football and volleyball. She ended up in prison and has been there since. Over the weekend, her lawyer said she’d been sentenced to a year in prison for spreading anti-regime propaganda. Jenni speaks to Ghoncheh’s brother Iman and BBC Persian TV reporter Rana Rahimpour'

also:

Adeline Ginn, founder of Women in Rail, on the LACK OF WOMEN in the industry

Despite the UK making more than a billion rail journeys each year and the rail industry experiencing billions of pounds worth of investment with Crossrail and HS2 – fewer than 20% of people working in the sector are women. Jenni talks to Adeline Ginn, General Counsel for Angel Trains and Founder of Women in Rail about why so few women thinking of a career within the industry.

'QUEER? Pete has long revelled in the unruly and bohemian side of Brighton and Hove. Now in his early fifties he is weary of jostling with tourists and party-goers and FEELS LIKE A STRANGER IN HIS OWN TOWN.

Having recently met someone on line who lives a mobile home in Aberystwyth, Pete prepares to pack up and move three hundred miles to be with them.'

12:04"Witness": Voting Against the War on Terror

'After the 9/11 attacks on America, the US Congress voted to give the NEGRO President extra powers to fight the 'War on Terror'. Only NEGRO Congresswoman Barbara Lee voted against the decision. Hear her reasoning.'

In October 1967 the Marxist revolutionary was captured and killed in Bolivia. Felix Rodriguez was a Cuban exile working for the CIA who helped track him down. He interrogated Che just before he was shot.

next episode of "Witness":

"The Soweto Uprising"

'In 1976 schoolchildren marched through Soweto to protest against a decision by the South African government to force them to study in Afrikaans. But security forces policing the march opened fire and the Soweto Uprising began. Bongi Mkhabela was a schoolgirl who helped organise the protest.'

13:45"Voices of the First World War" The Trenches 1914

' The experiences of soldiers in the trenches during the first few months of the war.' YAAAWN

'Irish government official and secret British agent, Francis Byrne, must act fast to encourage resistance and prevent Ireland from becoming a launch pad for a NAAAAAAZI invasion of Britain. But at what cost to the Irish people, and to his own loved ones?

Inspired by a recently discovered documents confirming HITLER'S wartime plans to INVADE IRELAND, and using both fictional and real characters, Desecration is a powerful counter-factual drama. It imagines how the first few days of such an invasion would have unfolded - and shows the stark moral dilemmas faced by a nation's leaders when the time comes to choose between resistance and collaboration.'

15:30"All in the Mind" Radicalisation

'Claudia explores pioneering new research into radicalisation. She talks to PAKI Professor Kamaldeep Bhui who is doing research to try and prevent radicalisation in the early stages. His idea is, if we can understand what makes someone sympathetic to violence and terrorist actions then radicalisation can be stopped before it starts. He explains why vulnerability to radicalisation is linked to depression. ' LOLS!

16:00"Thinking Allowed"

Fugitives from the law: Laurie Taylor talks to JEW Alice Goffman, Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, about 'On the Run' her study of the lives of African American men "caught up in" webs of criminality in Philadelphia.

( IT'S NOT THEIR FAULT, POOR THINGS)

She spent six years living in a neighbourhood marked by pervasive policing, violence and poverty. She argues that high tech surveillance and arrest quotas have done little to reduce crime or support young lives in the most disadvantaged parts of the US.

Also, Alison Phipps, Director of the Centre for Gender Studies at the University of Sussex, explores the rise of 'lad culture' in Higher Education and its relationship to the 'marketisation' of learning.

'The BBC Trust has approved a new service for Radio 1 and 1Xtra, which will see it having its own TV channel on the BBC iPlayer from next week. It's hoped the channel will lead to an incremental 310,000 hours of viewing per month, and help the BBC establish a relationship with its (NIGGER) younger viewers. But whilst it can offer the services, can the BBC offer the content that (NIGGERS)young people want?'

(Photo of Rhianna)

18:30"In and Out of the Kitchen" , The Wedding

FAGGOT Anthony is thrilled to best man at a wedding but FAGGOT Damien is not inclined to share his joy. (QUEER-COM)

19:15"Front Row" JEW Ben Elton interviewed about his new novel, Time And Time Again. His book follows ex-soldier Hugh Stanton who is transported back to 1914 from 2025, in order to prevent the Great War and re-write history.Eltons last novel was about NAAAZIS and HOLOCAUST.

Jones gets in a bit of Thatcher-bashing. He was born in 1984.He writes for the "right-wing" media,The Guardian.

More "Right-Wing" media:

BBC Radio 4skin, Thurs Nov 6 2014

10:00"Woman's Hour"

Fashion designer JEW Diane Von Furstenberg

'Diane talks to Jennie about creating her multi-million pound empire, life lessons from her mother, who was a HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR , and becoming the independent person she wanted to be.'

WIKI: a Belgian born American(?) fashion designer best known for her iconic wrap dress. She initially rose to prominence when she married into the German princely House of Fürstenberg, as the wife of Prince Egon of Fürstenberg.

(SHE'S NOW MARRIED TO BILLIONAIRE KIKE BARRY DILLER: Chairman and Senior Executive of IAC/InterActiveCorp and Expedia, Inc. and the media executive responsible for the creation of Fox Broadcasting Company and USA Broadcasting. Diller is a member of the Television Hall of Fame, having been inducted in 1994.)

Diane Simone Michelle Halfin was born in Brussels, Belgium to Jewish[7] parents. Her father was Romanian-born Leon (Lipa) Halfin, who immigrated to Belgium from Chişinău (then Bessarabia province of Romania and now the capital of Moldova) in 1929. Her mother was Greek-born Liliane Nahmias, a Holocaust survivor.

Just 18 months before von Fürstenberg was born, her mother was in the Auschwitz concentration camp.

(BUT OF COURSE! i'LL BET SHE MET MENGELE)

Von Fürstenberg has spoken broadly about her mother’s influence in her life, crediting her for teaching her that “Fear is not an option.” QY VEY!

10:45"15 Minute Drama" Writing the Century: Passages from Empire

Writer:JEW Vanessa Rosenthal

12:04"Witness": The Soweto Uprising

In 1976, schoolchildren marched in protest at the apartheid regime in South Africa.

13:45"Voices of the First World War" Prisoners of WarDan Snow hears soldiers' recollections of becoming prisoners of war in 1914.

Using the voices of soldiers who were among the first to be taken prisoner, Dan Snow explores the "conditions they endured in German camps" during the early stages of the war.

14:15Afternoon Drama The Man Who Fell to Earth

By (NEGRO?)Annalisa D'Innella. A man falls out of the sky, and three lives are changed.

HOW DID I KNOW IT WAS GOING TO BE A NIGGER?

"In the early hours of Sunday 9th September 2012, a young black man fell out of the sky and landed, dead, on a residential street in Barnes. The man had been a stowaway. Through three fictional residents in the street where the body landed, Annalisa D'Innella 's first radio play mixes fact with fiction to explore the experience of being (WHITE)British and (WHITE)middle class.

It's a play about (WHITE)greed, grief, courage, utopias and magical thinking - as well as our universal tendency to focus on what we lack instead of what we have."

'He is mostly known for his sculptures protesting against the war. This created many conflicts during the rise of the NAAAAAAZI Party, when most of his works were confiscated as degenerate art.'

'Also during his travels in Russia his son Nikolaus was born on August 20, 1906, starting a two-year fight with the mother, (JEW!)Rosa Schwab, for the custody of the child, which Barlach was finally granted.'

In passing, I'd like to mention that in Stephen Fallon's book "The Affirmative Action Hoax", affirmative action was first invented over 60 years ago in order to reduce the number of Jews in America's universities. They were becoming far too god-damned NERDY! Jews agreed with it too.

After 1965, when the whole world turned anti-white in a big way, AA went full on anti-white too.

Neil MacGregor discusses why Germany has the fastest-growing Jewish population in Europe.

"After concentration camps like Buchenwald and extermination camps like Auschwitz, it seemed that the story of Jews in Germany must come to a full stop at the end of the war. Why would any Jew in 1945, or in 1965 for that matter, see any part of their future in Germany? But remarkably Germany today has the fastest-growing Jewish population in Western Europe.

Fred is not "dumb" as his writings show wit, nuance and awareness of the psychological workings of society. I think a charitable view of Fred is that he's a cynic that knows that since it doesn't pay to name the jew, it might pay to praise the jew. Or being even more charitable maybe Fred is just honestly clueless, as he is of a generation that been fully indoctrinated with the jew spew. But, …

Re influx of jews to Germany, especially Berlin. Well that just makes it even more like the Weimar Republic, does it not? You can be assured that they will start their usual tricks and that it will blow up in their faces.

Like doing anything out of the ordinary in life you need to use good judgement and plain old commonsense. Crying out, "It's the damn Jooos!!!" in a crowded synagogue is not one of those things.

If, "Naming the jew" is causing people to consider you a nut, then you're doing it wrong! You need to be knowledgeable about what you are talking about and again use good judgement and strategies in social situations. Removing the swastika armband also has been known to help, when around liberals.

Right. It's a matter of effective tactics.

Has anyone here actually "Named the Jew" in a public place? And how has it worked? Thing is, if it does work, then can the reasons for this be explored? And if not, then why so? Too much of the discussion is done in an abstract sort of way, on the Internet, and not in a real world setting.

RE Fred Reed: it may be that he knows that you can get away with attacking blacks. Why? Because the havoc wrought by blacks is so blatant that it can not be ignored. Look at black violent crime, especially torture-murders of white people. Look at how a neighborhood into which blacks moves quickly goes down the tubes. Look at how entire cities which blacks control turn into post-apocalyptic hellholes, from Detroit to Johannesburg.

Also, blacks make never ending demands for welfare, affirmative action, and racial shakedowns ("reparations" for slavery is the latest racket in the USA). To your average white person, it is hard to ignore your house being broken into, your job being taken away, your children brutalized, your taxes raised, and etc. A good pro-white propagandist can get the message across to many victims of black criminality and black hustles.

It can be argued that blacks are just the front for the real string pullers, and that blacks would be rendered powerless if the puppet masters were taken out of the picture. But it comes back to getting whites to think racially. It's far easier to do this by playing off black transgressions--especially to those who have been victimized. A common enough statement I see on race realist blogs is, "I used to be a liberal until [fill in the black-on-white atrocity]." Effectively, black behavior pushes white people into racial thinking.

The situation that had prevailed in the former Confederacy States (and in reality most of the others as well) until about the middle of the last century was the natural order whereby a low intelligence, violent and largely indolent racial minority were kept at arms length from Whites, miscegenation carried punitive social repercussions and indulgence of their lawless and violent nature guaranteed swift and severe retribution.

When I was a mere lad, I would watch old action movies on the Late Show. One of my favorite genres was the "native uprising" wherein a small number of British regimentals or French Foreign Legionnaires took on any number of Africans, Arabs or what not. I can still remember them: "Four Feathers," "Desert Sands," "Lives of a Bengal Lancer," "Beau Geste" and of course--"Zulu."

It was natural and reasonable to see the "natives" as totally incapable of being part of a modern civilization. Natives simply did what natives always did: loot, pillage, burn, and generally run amok. No sane person would let them inside the fort gates. The idea of turning over an entire colony to them would have been considered utter madness. The whole point was to keep the natives in line so they do not reduce civilized lands to cannibalism or whatever. This is why we had repeater rifles and Gatlings! Even "Lawrence of Arabia" conceded that the natives could not keep the Damascus water works running--you needed civilized people to run the show.

All that wisdom has been tossed out the window these decadent days. The natives have been given control of many a city in the first world, not to mention entire countries in the third. The results? Whether it's Johannesburg or Detroit or London or Malmo or Kisangani (or whatever they are calling Stanleyville these days)--the natives are gangbanging, trashing the infrastructure, rioting, and generally running amok.

All very interesting, isn't it, that "progress" is now defined as letting the natives destroy civilization. It's something that any kid might see, but has otherwise escaped the adult world's attention.

I don't see how you can begin to identify the jew as the main culprit destroying White societies unless you NAME THEM. Bankers, masons, elites, illuminati, etc. doesn't quite make it. They still don't know specifically who you're talking about. How can you suitably identify bankers, elites, masons, or illuminati? You need to shock them. You might as well be precise, because the 999% don't believe any of it anyway. Jews is precise.

Why don't they believe you? Well, I believe the reason we get blank stares, no response, and no opinion for our very rational explanations for societal decline is due to their cognative dissonance. Cognative dissonance is a very real science or technique explored by jews which it seems they have thoroughly and deliberately inflicted on our people. For a lot more than a half century, through their control of electronic media, publishing, and the motion picture industry, the jews have drowned our people with philo-semitic feelings and indoctrination, many times each day of their entire lives, so much so, that they are unable to concentrate on the facts we reveal to them. That's why they seem hypnotized. They are in effect, when it comes to hearing the truth about the jews, which are sainted, multiple times 24/7/365, day in, day out, overtly and covertly, on every form of media that exists.

Cognative dissonance happens when a person is confronted with new information that conflicts with existing beliefs, ideas, or values they have. The more deeply one holds or values any belief, the greater the magnitude of the cognative dissonance. This is why our people, deeply indoctrinated by jewsmedia, can't or won't see the truth of any evil activity jews are behind.

Mentally, humans seek internal consistency. When we explain to them what's really happening, what jews are doing -- OH MY GOD, JEWS??!!?, it is totally inconsistent to their established belief system. It causes the reactions we see when we attempt to tell them or even show them the overwhelming evidence of jew perfidy, blank stare, no response, no opinion, even anger. If we persist, very soon they become uncomfortable, or even hostile in their frustration, and then it's "I gotta' go". And after they go, this discomfort caused by their cognative dissonance causes them to actively limit or avoid any future contact with you and you can imagine what they tell all your mutual 'friends' behind your back -- you HATER!

John Dicarlo. Point is there IS no easy answer. Some people will react differently than others. Each situation is different. One generalized truth is clear though, you cannot just hit them with all of it at once. Self-defeating.

Without going into details, my experience has always been roughly as I describe. I've had no different response. It seemes so odd to me that different people would always react the same way, similar or exactly the way I described. Imagine, finding out you were lied to all your life, which we have been, and those you inform, or begin to, aren't interested in knowing about it? -- no matter how you approach it? This idea of planting a seed, while in many cases that's all you can hope to do, is just wishful thinking as far as I'm concerned. Look, I'll keep trying whenever the opportunity presents itself, but now I'll understand the exact reason I'll be getting blank stares, stupid or contrary questions, change of topic and all the rest -- cognative dissonance, a deliberate jew agenda that has made minds mush.

I pushed the publish button instead of the edit and I also wanted to ask, is telling the morons, itz the jews! -- as yousay, " hitting them with all of it at once?" I'm not willing to stand with those who wish to keep the jews' secret as are those who say it's bankers, elites, masons, etc.

I don't see how you can begin to identify the jew as the main culprit destroying White societies unless you NAME THEM.

Again, can we see some example where "Naming the Jew" has actually worked in the last 60 years? I don't mean in the virtual world of the Internet, I mean in the real world of town hall meetings, church socials, corporate boardrooms and marches in the streets.

I see an endless discussion of "The Jews" online, but is this actually making any difference in the real world? The thing is, white nationalist movements need effective tactics to seize real political power.

Why don't they believe you? Well, I believe the reason we get blank stares, no response, and no opinion for our very rational explanations for societal decline is due to their cognitive dissonance.

This is so.

It's due in part to "Naming the Jew" coming off as conspiracy theory. It's like telling people it's all the fault of the Illuminati, or Federal Reserve, or whatever. You hit them with something that is so far above their echelon of understanding that they can not cope with it. So they switch off. Or if they agree, then nothing practical is on the table. If "The Jews" control the media, academia, the banks and possibly the government--then resistance appears futile, prepare to be assimilated!

But I do not buy that the forces that white peoples are up against are that powerful at all. To the contrary, they appear to be running scared. This is why they have to crack down on dissent via hatespeech laws, or put the screws on Golden Dawn, or whip up hysteria over Putin's Russia. If white nationalists give the system the right push, it could come crumbling down.

What needs to be determined here are tactics that work, and work in the real world.

Anyway, I appreciate the Savant for providing a forum for this discussion.

What is it that has been achieved by using code words for jews in the mainstream? The same nothing as to your negative views on specifically naming the jews. When you want to exclude the copious exposure jews have suffered from being named on the internet, the most, by far, they've been exposed in all of history, is that exposure due to referring to them as bankers, elites, illuminati, or by naming the jew?

Five years ago it was difficult to find much information about jew perfidy on the internet, but now it is profuse. Do you believe it's just the same "two" people putting up more information about jews on the internet, or has that number, of those on-to-the-jews, grown into the tens of thousands? If someone seeks, or even by chance runs across information connecting jews to the nation wrecking they are about, isn't there some chance that individual will be curious to look into it more closely? Or even connect the puzzle pieces? Looking into illuminati, for example, is pretty much a dead end. Anything but naming the jew specifically is being controlled by jews, or political correctness.

The idea and term, "conspiracy theory", is just another part of the copious jew brainwashing people have succumbed to. If that isn't specifically the reason for their cognative dissonance, some other point you make will be. At least when you tell them it's the jew, it's the verifiable TRUTH, and they can examine the truth from there if they choose to. Anything else, illuminati, etc., just leads them back to the outer-space they live in, as it's meant to.

Who cares how naming the jew comes off to people who don't want to know anything, the cognative dissonant that doesn't believe anything that is different from their own world view? When confronted with such denseness, cognative dissonance, the only thing one can do is move on to someone who's not hypnotized -- not question yourself that you may have come on too strong. Any explanation that conveys the idea, overtly, or covertly, that jews are behind the problems we face, can result in cognative dissonance.