(MI_Metadata)fileIdentifier: gov.noaa.csc.maps:ms2006_mdeq_campshelby_m2563language: eng; USAcharacterSet: (MD_CharacterSetCode) utf8hierarchyLevel: (MD_ScopeCode) datasetcontact: (CI_ResponsibleParty)individualName: Mike SutherlandorganisationName: DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of CommercecontactInfo: (CI_Contact)phone: (CI_Telephone)voice: 303-497-6120facsimile: 303-497-6513address: (CI_Address)deliveryPoint: NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC E/GC1 325 Broadwaycity: BoulderadministrativeArea: COpostalCode: 80305-3328country: USAelectronicMailAddress: mike.sutherland@noaa.govhoursOfService: 7:30am-5:00pm Mountainrole: (CI_RoleCode) authordateStamp: 2013-10-17metadataStandardName: ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata - Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded DatametadataStandardVersion: ISO 19115-2:2009(E)return to topspatialRepresentationInfo: (MD_VectorSpatialRepresentation)geometricObjects: (MD_GeometricObjects)geometricObjectType: (MD_GeometricObjectTypeCode) pointreturn to topreferenceSystemInfo: (MD_ReferenceSystem)referenceSystemIdentifier: (RS_Identifier)authority: (CI_Citation)title: North American Datum 1983alternateTitle: NAD83date: (CI_Date)date: 2007-01-19dateType: (CI_DateTypeCode) revisioncitedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty)organisationName: contactInfo: (CI_Contact)onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource)linkage: http://www.epsg-registry.org/export.htm?gml=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269name: NAD83description: Link to Geographic Markup Language (GML) description of reference system.function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) informationrole: (CI_RoleCode) resourceProvidercitedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty)organisationName: European Petroleum Survey GroupcontactInfo: (CI_Contact)onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource)linkage: http://www.epsg-registry.org/name: European Petroleum Survey Group Geodetic Parameter Registrydescription: Registry that accesses the EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset, which is a structured dataset of Coordinate Reference Systems and Coordinate Transformations.function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) searchrole: (CI_RoleCode) publishercode: urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269return to topreferenceSystemInfo: (MD_ReferenceSystem)referenceSystemIdentifier: (RS_Identifier)code: Ellipsoid in MeterscodeSpace: Local Vertical Referencereturn to topidentificationInfo: (MD_DataIdentification)citation: (CI_Citation)title: 2006 MDEQ Camp Shelby, MS Lidar Surveydate: (CI_Date)date: 2013-09-23dateType: (CI_DateTypeCode) publicationcitedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty)organisationName: DOC/NOAA/NOS/OCM > Office for Coastal Management, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of CommercecontactInfo: (CI_Contact)phone: (CI_Telephone)voice: 843-740-1200address: (CI_Address)deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave.city: CharlestonadministrativeArea: SCpostalCode: 29405-2413electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.govonlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource)linkage: http://coast.noaa.govrole: (CI_RoleCode) originatorcitedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty)organisationName: Mississippi Department of Environmental Qualityrole: (CI_RoleCode) originatorcitedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty)organisationName: DOC/NOAA/NOS/OCM > Office for Coastal Management, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of CommercecontactInfo: (CI_Contact)phone: (CI_Telephone)voice: 843-740-1200address: (CI_Address)deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave.city: CharlestonadministrativeArea: SCpostalCode: 29405-2413electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.govonlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource)linkage: http://coast.noaa.govrole: (CI_RoleCode) publisherpresentationForm: (CI_PresentationFormCode) imageDigitalabstract: This metadata record describes the acquisition and processing of bare earth lidar data, raw point cloud lidar data, lidar intensity data, and floodmap breaklines consisting of a total of 280 sheets for Camp Shelby, MS. The post-spacing for this project is 3-meter. This project was broken into 3 parts, Acquisition, Part A Processing, and Part B Processing. Acquisition was tasked by Mississippi Geographic Information, LLC (MGI); Work Order No. ED-5. Part A Processing was tasked by MGI; Work Order No. ED-7. Part B Processing was tasked by MGI; Work Order No. ED-8. EarthData International, Inc. (EarthData) is a member of MGI and was authorized to undertake this project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Professional Services Agreement between MGI and the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), dated February 17, 2004, and in accordance with MGI Task Order No. 18a. This project is being delivered to the City of Hattiesburg, Camp Shelby, USGS, and MDEQ. Products developed for the City of Hattiesburg (City of 1. Final lidar data georeferenced to MS State Plane East Zone, NAD83, NAVD88, US Survey foot 2. Bare earth lidar data in ASCII format and LAS format 3. Raw point cloud lidar data in LAS format 4. Lidar intensity data in TIF format 5. Digital flight line index in ESRI-compatible format 6. Survey control report 7. Lidar processing report Products developed for Camp Shelby (Part A) include the 1. Final lidar data georeferenced to UTM Zone 16 North, NAD83, NAVD88, meters 2. Bare earth lidar data in ASCII format and LAS format 3. Raw point cloud lidar data in LAS format 4. Lidar intensity data in TIF format 5. Digital flight line index in ESRI-compatible format 6. Survey control report 7. Lidar processing report Products developed for USGS (Part A and Part B) include 1. Final lidar data georeferenced to MS State Plane East Zone, NAD83, NAVD88, US Survey foot 2. Bare earth lidar data in ASCII format and LAS format 3. Raw point cloud lidar data in LAS format 4. Lidar intensity data in TIF format 5. Digital flight line index in ESRI-compatible format 6. Survey control report 7. Lidar processing report Products developed for MDEQ (Part A and Part B) include 1. Final lidar data georeferenced to MS State Plane East Zone, NAD83, NAVD88, US Survey foot 2. Bare earth lidar data in ASCII format and LAS format 3. Raw point cloud lidar data in LAS format 4. Lidar intensity data in TIF format 5. Floodmap breaklines in ESRI shapefile format 6. Digital flight line index in ESRI-compatible format 7. Survey control report 8. Lidar processing reportpurpose: The acquisition, processing, and delivery of bare earth lidar data, raw point cloud lidar data, lidar intensity data, and floodmap breaklines covering Camp Shelby, MS was a coordinated effort between EarthData and MGI to support Mississippi Digital Earth Model (MDEM) and FEMA flood mapping requirements. Floodmap breaklines are intended to support DFIRM modeling and update only, and will be delivered to MDEQ for use on the DFIRM program.status: (MD_ProgressCode) completedpointOfContact: (CI_ResponsibleParty)organisationName: Mississippi Department of Environmental QualitypositionName: Mississippi Digital Elevation Model ProjectcontactInfo: (CI_Contact)phone: (CI_Telephone)voice: 601-961-5506address: (CI_Address)deliveryPoint: P.O. Box 2279city: JacksonadministrativeArea: MSpostalCode: 39225country: USAelectronicMailAddress: Stephen_Champlin@deq.state.ms.usrole: (CI_RoleCode) pointOfContactresourceMaintenance: (MD_MaintenanceInformation)maintenanceAndUpdateFrequency: (MD_MaintenanceFrequencyCode) unknowngraphicOverview: (MD_BrowseGraphic)fileName: ftp://ftp.csc.noaa.gov/pub/crs/beachmap/qa_docs/ms/campshelby/ms2006_mdeq_campshelby.kmzfileDescription: This kmz file shows the extent of coverage for the 2006 MDEQ Camp Shelby, MS lidar data set.fileType: KMZdescriptiveKeywords: (MD_Keywords)keyword: LiDARkeyword: DEMkeyword: Topographickeyword: bare earthkeyword: intensity imagekeyword: LASkeyword: Elevationkeyword: Modelkeyword: LAZkeyword: Remote Sensingtype: (MD_KeywordTypeCode) themethesaurusName: (CI_Citation)title: nonedate: descriptiveKeywords: (MD_Keywords)keyword: United Stateskeyword: Mississippikeyword: Tupelokeyword: Lamar Countykeyword: Forrest Countykeyword: Perry Countykeyword: Stone Countykeyword: Greene Countykeyword: George Countykeyword: Hattiesburgtype: (MD_KeywordTypeCode) placethesaurusName: (CI_Citation)title: Nonedate: resourceConstraints: (MD_Constraints)useLimitation: These data depict the elevations at the time of the survey and are only accurate for that time. Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA or any of its partners. These data are NOT to be used for navigational purposes.resourceConstraints: (MD_LegalConstraints)useLimitation: While every effort has been made to ensure that these data are accurate and reliable within the limits of the current state of the art, NOAA cannot assume liability for any damages caused by any errors or omissions in the data, nor as a result of the failure of the data to function on a particular system. NOAA makes no warranty, expressed or implied, nor does the fact of distribution constitute such a warranty.aggregationInfo: (MD_AggregateInformation)aggregateDataSetName: (CI_Citation)title: Lidar Final Reportdate: citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty)positionName: Citation URLcontactInfo: (CI_Contact)onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource)linkage: ftp://ftp.csc.noaa.gov/pub/crs/beachmap/qa_docs/ms/campshelby/ms2006_mdeq_campshelby.pdfname: Lidar Final Reportdescription: function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) informationrole: associationType: (DS_AssociationTypeCode) crossReferencespatialRepresentationType: (MD_SpatialRepresentationTypeCode) vectorlanguage: eng; USAtopicCategory: (MD_TopicCategoryCode) elevationextent: (EX_Extent)geographicElement: (EX_GeographicBoundingBox)westBoundLongitude: -89.654184eastBoundLongitude: -88.618893southBoundLatitude: 30.648553northBoundLatitude: 31.433926temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent)extent: TimePeriod: beginPosition: 2006-03-26endPosition: 2006-03-27return to topdistributionInfo: (MD_Distribution)distributionFormat: (MD_Format)name: LAZversion: distributor: (MD_Distributor)distributorContact: (CI_ResponsibleParty)organisationName: DOC/NOAA/NOS/OCM > Office for Coastal Management, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of CommercecontactInfo: (CI_Contact)phone: (CI_Telephone)voice: 843-740-1200address: (CI_Address)deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave.city: CharlestonadministrativeArea: SCpostalCode: 29405-2413electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.govonlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource)linkage: http://coast.noaa.govrole: (CI_RoleCode) distributordistributionOrderProcess: (MD_StandardOrderProcess)orderingInstructions: The National Geophysical Data Center serves as the archive for this LIDAR data. NGDC should only be contacted for this data if it cannot be obtained from
NOAA Coastal Services Center.distributor: (MD_Distributor)distributorContact: (CI_ResponsibleParty)individualName: Mike SutherlandorganisationName: DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of CommercecontactInfo: (CI_Contact)phone: (CI_Telephone)voice: 303-497-6120facsimile: 303-497-6513address: (CI_Address)deliveryPoint: NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC E/GC1 325 Broadwaycity: BoulderadministrativeArea: COpostalCode: 80305-3328country: USAelectronicMailAddress: mike.sutherland@noaa.govhoursOfService: 7:30am-5:00pm Mountainrole: (CI_RoleCode) distributordistributionOrderProcess: (MD_StandardOrderProcess)orderingInstructions: The National Geophysical Data Center serves as the archive for this LIDAR dataset. NGDC should only be contacted for the data if it cannot be obtained from
NOAA Coastal Services Center.return to topdataQualityInfo: (DQ_DataQuality)scope: (DQ_Scope)level: (MD_ScopeCode) datasetreport: (DQ_AbsoluteExternalPositionalAccuracy)nameOfMeasure: Horizontal Positional Accuracy ReportevaluationMethodDescription: The lidar data fully comply with FEMA guidance as published in Appendix A, April, 2003.result: report: (DQ_AbsoluteExternalPositionalAccuracy)nameOfMeasure: Vertical Positional Accuracy ReportevaluationMethodDescription: The lidar data fully comply with FEMA guidance as published in Appendix A, April 2003. When compared to GPS survey grade points in generally flat non-vegetated areas, at least 95% of the positions have an error less than or equal to 37 cm (equivalent to root mean square error of 18.5 cm if errors were normally distributed).result: report: (DQ_CompletenessCommission)evaluationMethodDescription: 1. EarthData's proprietary software, Checkedb, for verification against ground survey points. 2. Terrascan, for verification of automated and manual editing and final QC of products.result: report: (DQ_ConceptualConsistency)measureDescription: Compliance with the accuracy standard was ensured by the placement of GPS ground control after the acquisition 1. The ground control and airborne GPS data stream were validated through a fully analytical boresight adjustment. 2. The digital terrain model (DTM) data were checked against the project control. 3. Lidar elevation data was validated through an inspection of edge matching and visual inspection for quality (artifact removal).result: lineage: (LI_Lineage)processStep: (LE_ProcessStep)description: EarthData has developed a unique method for processing lidar data to identify and remove elevation points falling on vegetation, buildings, and other aboveground structures. The algorithms for filtering data were utilized within EarthData's proprietary software and commercial software written by TerraSolid. This software suite of tools provides efficient processing for small to large-scale, projects and has been incorporated into ISO 9001 compliant production work flows. The following is a 1. The technician performs calibrations on the data set. 2. The technician performed a visual inspection of the data to verify that the flight lines overlap correctly. The technician also verified that there were no voids, and that the data covered the project limits. The technician then selected a series of areas from the data set and inspected them where adjacent flight lines overlapped. These overlapping areas were merged and a process which utilizes 3-D Analyst and EarthData's proprietary software was run to detect and color code the differences in elevation values and profiles. The technician reviewed these plots and located the areas that contained systematic errors or distortions that were introduced by the lidar sensor. 3. Systematic distortions highlighted in step 2 were removed and the data was re-inspected. Corrections and adjustments can involve the application of angular deflection or compensation for curvature of the ground surface that can be introduced by crossing from one type of land cover to another. 4. The lidar data for each flight line was trimmed in batch for the removal of the overlap areas between flight lines. The data was checked against a control network to ensure that vertical requirements were maintained. Conversion to the client-specified datum and projections were then completed. The lidar flight line data sets were then segmented into adjoining tiles for batch processing and data management. 5. The initial batch-processing run removed 95% of points falling on vegetation. The algorithm also removed the points that fell on the edge of hard features such as structures, elevated roadways and bridges. 6. The operator interactively processed the data using lidar editing tools. During this final phase the operator generated a TIN based on a desired thematic layers to evaluate the automated classification performed in step 5. This allowed the operator to quickly re-classify points from one layer to another and recreate the TIN surface to see the effects of edits. Geo-referenced images were toggled on or off to aid the operator in identifying problem areas. The data was also examined with an automated profiling tool to aid the operator in the reclassification. 7. The final bare earth was written to an LAS 1.0 format and also converted to ASCII. 8. The point cloud data were delivered in LAS 1.0 format.dateTime: DateTime: 2007-02-15T00:00:00processor: (CI_ResponsibleParty)individualName: Angela WorleyorganisationName: EarthData International, Inc.positionName: Project ManagercontactInfo: (CI_Contact)phone: (CI_Telephone)voice: 301-948-8550 x222facsimile: 301-963-2064address: (CI_Address)deliveryPoint: 7320 Executive Waycity: FrederickadministrativeArea: MDpostalCode: 21704country: USAelectronicMailAddress: aworley@earthdata.comhoursOfService: Monday through Friday, 8:30am to 5:00pmrole: (CI_RoleCode) processorprocessStep: (LE_ProcessStep)description: EarthData utilizes a combination of proprietary and COTS processes to generate intensity images from the lidar data. Intensity images are generated from the full points cloud (minus noise points) and the pixel width is typically matched to the post spacing of the lidar data to achieve the best resolution. The following steps are used to 1. Lidar point cloud is tiled to the deliverable tile layout. 2. All noise points, spikes, and wells are deleted out of the tiles. 3. An EarthData proprietary piece of software, EEBN2TIF is then used to process out the intensity values of the lidar. At this point, the pixel size is selected based on best fit or to match the client specification if noted in the SOW. 4. The software then generates TIF and TFW files for each tile. 5. ArcView is used to review and QC the tiles before delivery. 6. The lidar intensity data were delivered in TIF format.dateTime: DateTime: 2007-02-15T00:00:00processor: (CI_ResponsibleParty)individualName: Angela WorleyorganisationName: EarthData International, Inc.positionName: Project ManagercontactInfo: (CI_Contact)phone: (CI_Telephone)voice: 301-948-8550 x222facsimile: 301-963-2064address: (CI_Address)deliveryPoint: 7320 Executive Waycity: FrederickadministrativeArea: MDpostalCode: 21704country: USAelectronicMailAddress: aworley@earthdata.comhoursOfService: Monday through Friday, 8:30am to 5:00pmrole: (CI_RoleCode) processorprocessStep: (LE_ProcessStep)description: The NOAA Coastal Services Center (CSC) received topographic files in .LAZ format. The files contained lidar elevation and intensity measurements. The data were received in Mississippi State Plane East (2301, feet) and NAVD88 vertical datum (feet). CSC performed the following processing for data storage and Digital Coast provisioning purposes: 1. The topographic laz files were converted from orthometric (NAVD88) heights to ellipsoidal heights using Geoid09. 2. The topographic laz files were transformed from MS-SP 2301 to a Geographic Coordinate system (NAD83). 3. The topographic laz files were cleaned of high (460 m) and low (0 m) error points and variable length records (vlr) were removed. 4. The topographic las files' horizontal units were converted from feet to decimal degrees.dateTime: DateTime: 2013-09-22T00:00:00processor: (CI_ResponsibleParty)organisationName: DOC/NOAA/NOS/OCM > Office for Coastal Management, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of CommercecontactInfo: (CI_Contact)phone: (CI_Telephone)voice: 843-740-1200address: (CI_Address)deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave.city: CharlestonadministrativeArea: SCpostalCode: 29405-2413electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.govonlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource)linkage: http://coast.noaa.govrole: (CI_RoleCode) processorprocessStep: (LE_ProcessStep)description: The NOAA National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) received lidar data files via ftp transfer from the NOAA Coastal Services Center. The data are currently
being served via NOAA CSC Digital Coast at http://www.csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/. The data can be used to re-populate the system. The data are archived in LAS or LAZ format.
The LAS format is an industry standard for LiDAR data developed by the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS); LAZ is a loseless compressed version of
LAS developed by Martin Isenburg (http://www.laszip.org/). The data are exclusively in geographic coordinates (either NAD83 or ITRF94). The data are referenced vertically to
the ellipsoid (either GRS80 or ITRF94), allowing for the ability to apply the most up to date geoid model when transforming to orthometric heights.dateTime: DateTime: 2013-10-17T00:00:00processor: (CI_ResponsibleParty)individualName: Mike SutherlandorganisationName: DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of CommercecontactInfo: (CI_Contact)phone: (CI_Telephone)voice: 303-497-6120facsimile: 303-497-6513address: (CI_Address)deliveryPoint: NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC E/GC1 325 Broadwaycity: BoulderadministrativeArea: COpostalCode: 80305-3328country: USAelectronicMailAddress: mike.sutherland@noaa.govhoursOfService: 7:30am-5:00pm Mountainrole: (CI_RoleCode) processorsource: (LI_Source)description: Source Contribution: MGI requested the collection of lidar data over Camp Shelby, MS. In response EarthData acquired the data from March 21 to April 12, 2006 using its aircraft with tail number N62912. Lidar data was captured using an ALS50 lidar system, including an inertial measuring unit (IMU) and a dual frequency GPS receiver. An additional GPS receiver was in constant operation over a National Geodetic Survey published point by EarthData at Hattiesburg- Bobby L. Chain Municipal Airport which was later tied into a local network by Waggoner Engineering, Inc. During the data acquisition, the receivers collected phase data at an epoch rate of 1 Hz. The solution from Camp Shelby, MS was found to be of high integrity and met the accuracy requirements for the project. These accuracy checks also verified that the data meets the guidelines outlined in FEMA's Guidelines. Source Type: DVDsourceCitation: (CI_Citation)title: Aerial Acquisition of Lidar Data for Camp Shelby, MSdate: (CI_Date)date: 2006-04-12dateType: (CI_DateTypeCode) publicationedition: 1citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty)organisationName: EarthData International, Inc. (Aviation Division)role: (CI_RoleCode) originatorpresentationForm: (CI_PresentationFormCode) modelDigitalsourceExtent: (EX_Extent)temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent)extent: TimeInstant: timePosition: 2007-02-15source: (LI_Source)description: Source Contribution: Waggoner Engineering, Inc., under contract to EarthData successfully established ground control for Camp Shelby, MS. A total of 36 ground control points in Camp Shelby, MS were acquired. GPS was used to establish the control network. The horizontal datum was the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). The vertical datum was the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). Source Type: electronic mail systemsourceCitation: (CI_Citation)title: Camp Shelby, Mississippi - Lidar Controldate: (CI_Date)date: 2006-09-26dateType: (CI_DateTypeCode) publicationedition: 1citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty)organisationName: Waggoner Engineering, Inc.role: (CI_RoleCode) originatorpresentationForm: (CI_PresentationFormCode) documentDigitalsourceExtent: (EX_Extent)temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent)extent: TimeInstant: timePosition: 2006-09-26return to topmetadataMaintenance: (MD_MaintenanceInformation)maintenanceAndUpdateFrequency: (MD_MaintenanceFrequencyCode) annuallydateOfNextUpdate: 2014-10-17maintenanceNote: This metadata was automatically generated from the FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata standard (version FGDC-STD-001-1998) using the 2013-01-04 version of the FGDC RSE to ISO 19115-2 for LiDAR transform.maintenanceNote: Translated from FGDC 2013-10-17T11:27:48.538-06:00