Hi,
About sections ÃŸ6.1 and ÃŸ6.2, is there a difference between:
1. a declaration being 'invalid' (and thus being ignored by the parser
to allow old-style fallbacks)
2. being 'not supported' (resolving to false in @supports)
?
IÃ­m thinking in particular of 6.2Ã­s comment on values that might be
valid in a spec but the UA "do not have a usable level of support for".
I think that the two notions should be the same, and that 6.2Ã­s comments
should apply to both. CSS 2.1 was less clear on this subject, only IÃ­m
not sure that itÃ­s within css3-conditionalÃ­s scope to affect the parser.
Should this last part go into css3-syntax?
--
Simon Sapin