On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 09:51 +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
> It was <2013-10-01 wto 17:36>, when Rusty Lynch wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 15:13 +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
> >> Hello Everyone.
> >>
> >> I've got a practical question. What does it mean "verified" in gerrit?
> >> Especially now when there are no ARM images to test patched packages.
> >>
> >> Is it OK to mark changes as verified if I can build RPM without errors?
> >
> > Verified means you have taken one of the tizen generated images and
> > installed the freshly built package and then verified the package does
> > what you think it's supposed to do without causing unexpected side
> > effects.
> >
> > Since we have multiple platforms with multiple verticals, I like to add
> > a comment that explains what I verified on (like for example 'verified
> > on the XYZ image run on ABC device').
>>http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=2158>> Let's see what happens.
/me crosses fingers
>> > Of course the hard part here is that the mobile images are still in an
> > early bringup stage so you guys will need to stretch the definition of
> > verified a bit, but as soon as mobile is healthy again then all of us
> > need to take a strict view of verified.
>> OK, I understand.
>> > Note that if the package is used on IVI then you can ask one of us
> > working on IVI to test the image.
>> Can I assume posting a request on this list is with a tag
> [IVI Verification] is enough for such request?
>
I say it's worth a try.
--rusty