¡SCIENCE! Sweetly Validates The Fundamental Premise

Eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap. Every psychological dynamic you see playing out in mass societies liberated from artificial constraints on the sexual market flows from this premise. This means, as a systemic matter, women are coddled, men are upbraided. Women are victims, men are victimizers. Women need a leg up, men need to man up. Women have advocacy groups, men have equal opportunity violations. A woman subjected to the indignity of eavesdropping on a tame joke about dongles makes national news, while the chilling fact that 95% of all workplace deaths are suffered by men barely pings the media consciousness.

The Fundamental Premise essentially states that women are more reproductively valuable than are men, and that this inherent biological disparity in sex-based worth precipitates all sorts of double standards in social policy and cultural norms.

Aaaaaaand once again ¡SCIENCE!, with love in her heart and fire in her loins, administers a meticulous old-fashioned to my tumescent ego.

Moral decision making study finds men willing to sacrifice 3 hypothetical men for every woman of reproductive value.

***

Killing someone in order to save several lives seems more morally acceptable to men than to women. We suggest that this greater approbation of utilitarian killings may reflect gender differences in the tolerance to inflicting physical harm, which are partly the product of sexual selection. Based on this account, we predicted that men may be less utilitarian than women in other conditions. In four studies, we show that men are more likely than women to make the anti-utilitarian (hypothetical) choice of causing three same sex deaths to save one opposite sex life; and that this choice is more likely when there are fewer potential sexual partners, more likely for heterosexual men and less likely if the female character to be saved no longer has reproductive value.

The id-shiv is contained in that final bolded part. That, more than anything, proves the Fundamental Premise: women are coddled only when they still have REPRODUCTIVE VALUE. As women age into the dead ovary zone, men treat them same as they do other men: with utilitarian indifference.

This, too, explains more than anything the bitter man-hating rage that your typical aging feminist spinster is capable of uncorking on “the patriarchy”. She has lost her female privilege, a privilege that, unlike the mythological male privilege, has real world evidence (and, now, scientific evidence) proving its existence.

White Knighting and Pussy Pedestaling is baked in the braincake, so to speak. As is the disposability of men. Remember all this the next time some whackjob feminist is screeching about the poor poor wymyn suffering under the boot heel of male privilege. She is constructing a semantic fantasy world and deluding herself that she lives in it. Her lying theatrics are a balm for the fear that she’s discovering what it’s really like to live as a man in what is in reality a woman’s world.

Like this:

Related

33 Responses

Was watching The Hateful Eight the other day for the third time (cue hysterics). Apart from the good dialogue and acting, I reflected on the denouement, where Daisy Domergue is hauled up by her neck and hanged to the absolute glee and relief of the remaining protagonists.

Consider how rare that it is in movies — not only that a woman dies, but that her death is celebrated by men. You won’t find many others that allow it. Women are always protected and spared. And you don’t even have to do a search to know that some shrike at Jezebel interpreted the ending as “misogyny”.

One of my recent Tinder matches was a typical feminist liberal whose strapline read ‘Fighting for women in a male-dominated society’. My opener was ‘Lol what male-dominated society would this be?’. Cue a massive paragraph of abuse about my ‘male privilege’ to which I replied with a laughing smiley and ignored further replies.

Two days later I get another reply ‘Hi sorry I was in a really bad mood. How’s you?’. They know it’s all bullshit, It’s up to us men to call them out on it. Feminism is a massive shit-test that Western men have failed badly.

Nice. She realized she was shooting herself in the foot with the tirade. Getting very rare these days.

A buddy of mine matched with a cute Latina the other day. She asks if he wanted to come over to make out. He says, “Yea. My truck is loud and I’m voting Trump.” Her reply: “Perfect, my parents will be extra pissed.”

If said buddy is neither Hispanic himself nor a college athlete, I’m impressed.
In life-or-death situations, I’ll be saving any animals present first.
If there’s a REALLY hot girl, she can come, too.
Other than that…..well, y’all can swim, right……..

“This, too, explains more than anything the bitter man-hating rage that your typical aging feminist spinster is capable of uncorking on “the patriarchy”. She has lost her female privilege, a privilege that, unlike the mythological male privilege, has real world evidence (and, now, scientific evidence) proving its existence.”

Is post-Wall carousel ejection and invisibility to alphas as soul-destroying as beta male invisibility to women?

[CH: id have to imagine it’s much worse for post-wall women. it’s conventional wisdom that it hurts a lot more to lose status than to have never had status.]

I think it’s worse. As long as a beta is not a complete loser, even as he gets older, he still has a chance of landing of wife, and start a family. A woman on the other hand, after a certain age is just about finished. There are exceptions of course, but the world is filled with young women, and as long as the Alpha has a heartbeat, he’s got options.

For sure. Men, even if they’re good looking, can’t rely on looks alone to insure they become the type of person other people want to be around, so they have to develop their social skills as well, and they get better at it while they age.

Women on the other hand, can have the personality of a door knob, but as long as they’ve got the looks, they’ll have the men scrambling to get their attention. While they’re young and juicy this works to their advantage, but it’s a very short-term advantage, and soon enough, if they have nothing more then looks to offer, they’ll be tossed aside once those fade away.

I’m seeing many women extend this beauty advantage right up until 40ish, depending on their skin genetics and how much they’ve poisoned their liver with drugs and alcohol. sure they have to re-jigger their expectations on the type of men they attract, but the line of betas thirsting to lock down a fit forty yo is still around the corner.

so even after 25 years on the carousel, and being incapable of having a healthy baby, they still can land a decent guy with resources. I’ve seen it happen enough times to make it part of my disgust cannon, to browse when I’m having too good of a day.

a hot girl I dated in her thirties eventually locked down a wealthy guy when she was 41. tried to have a kid, but the babies kept dying before they could make it out. they’re still a pair. dude is very successful, good looking.

last I heard, they were going to m@rriage counseling. m@rriage counseling with a 42yo roadworn barren slut! can you imagine?!? the hapless chaps are legion. keep spreading the word.

Then there are the women who, by a bad luck of the draw, never had the better looks or thin figures, and ended up alone and/or childless – when they would have loved to have found a nice man and had 2-4 children for him. I have to imagine their anger at the many good looking women who voluntarily toss away the things that a normal, feminine woman should want. Maybe they have some satisfaction in seeing these once-upon-a-time princesses end up alone and childless, too.

Well, this would have to be quantified by neurochemical measurement of “pain”, but both sexes have their strategies for coping with irrelevance: beta males become otakus like Lucius, while post-wall females take refuge in cats, desperate young dudes in Florida bars, “social justice” work, and the approbation of other post-wall females.

Women are more malicious and cruel than men. A man might cope with irrelevance by turning inward and developing a rich life without external rewards. A woman, by contrast, will turn towards poisoning the lives of the happy women around her. Her strategy for coping is to bring everyone down to her level. It’s not he irrelevance that hurts, but rather the contrast of her own empty, meaningless life to her happy friends. If she can destroy their happiness, there won’t be any contrast.

Ch’s “Fundamental Premise” post is still, in my humble opinion, the finest piece of writing ever produced on this website. Gives me chills. Makes one hell of a pep talk speech on par with Baldwin in Glengarry glen ross.

Quixotic, thank you…I went back in the archives to find that one, as it was before I found this site. Truly, and excellent read.

“This is why to live as a man is to TAKE what you want. Not to wait for it to be given to you. Because it will never be given. Not to anticipate the empathy of the overseers. Because they will never empathize. Not to expect the coddling of the crowd. Because they will never coddle. Not to assume the wagon circling of kindreds. Because they will never circle for you. You got the short stick, now what? Do you contemplate it and hope for a longer one? No.

You sharpen it and jab it into the heart of every obstacle that sets itself in your way.”

One notorious head of a criminal gang in my home town was so vicious he’d shoot or cut open any addict who could not pay off a debt.
His gang terrorized the area and he had to wear a colostomy bag from a gun shot wound.
Did not stop him from fathering 3 kids in succession with a stunning 9 who nailed down his alpha seed quickly before inevitably he was gunned down.
She still pines after him.

Those beta cube jockeys who do “everything right” will never taste the joys of ripe young hotness.

This also proves that things need to get worse so things can get better for men. Perhaps we need a Mestizo/Muslim/African invasion to make white men valuable again. I think it would reinvigorate high T white men to rise up and take control by force, which will naturally give women the tingles they are presently looking to get from the brown hordes.

Absolutely they do. Women love a man who looks and behaves in a way that lets her know he’d slaughter the barbarians, degenerates, and third world invaders. My gf protests when I describe how I’d love to annihilate them, but her wet panties betray her words.