who would you rather watch, as a casual? i had my friends over recently for the kell brooke vs carson jones, the fury fight, and to finish up we watched wlad thompson II all of my friends said it was boring, so i have just had a thought...

He throws more punches, and from different angles, Vitali has a more varied offense which is based on hitting the opponent as much as possible, where Wladimir is more about placing the punches and finding a place to land the big right hand.

Vitali is also much better when being under pressure, he can fight off his back foot, counter and fight his way out of jams.. Wlad's style is based on the jab and keeping his opponents away, if someone gets to the inside he will clinch..

Wladimir has a better resume, but i rate Vitali higher H2h and entertainment wise.

He throws more punches, and from different angles, Vitali has a more varied offense which is based on hitting the opponent as much as possible, where Wladimir is more about placing the punches and finding a place to land the big right hand.

Vitali is also much better when being under pressure, he can fight off his back foot, counter and fight his way out of jams.. Wlad's style is based on the jab and keeping his opponents away, if someone gets to the inside he will clinch..

Wladimir has a better resume, but i rate Vitali higher H2h and entertainment wise.

very true i rate vitali as the better fighter and he is more entertaining

Neither. What fight in the last 5 years were they involved in that was a barnburner.? Surprise me?

I just saw Vitali vs Shannon Briggs on youtube. One of the better beatdowns if you ask me. Then I saw Vitali vs Charr, Vitali has gotten a lot slower in a very short period of time. And he was never that fast to begin with.

I just saw Vitali vs Shannon Briggs on youtube. One of the better beatdowns if you ask me. Then I saw Vitali vs Charr, Vitali has gotten a lot slower in a very short period of time. And he was never that fast to begin with.