Protecting men from sororities: the power shifts

The fallout from the otherwise deadly serious gang rape story-cum-hoax at the University of Virginia (UVA), first “reported” by Rolling Stone and later retracted because of, well, hoax, has taken a somewhat amusing turn. Now that Greek organizations (sororities for women exclusively and fraternities for both men & women) have been restored to operation at UVA, and despite draconian drinking party restrictions forced onto fraternities by the feminist-dominated UVA administration, it seems that this last weekend, sorority girls have been banned from attending parties thrown by fraternity men. Wah wah wah.

Ignoring the damage done to a fraternity as the result of feminist UVA coed Jackie Coakley’s ludicrous and ever-changing accounts of her supposed gang rape, the sorority girls are having a hissy fit: what, no parties? The independent girls get in but we are locked up at home?

Setting aside the obvious and problematic nature of feminist-driven rape hoaxes – they hurt innocent men up to and including lynching them, they undermine the credibility of legitimate rape victims of both (okay, all) genders, they are lies, they create unnecessary fear in both men & women, and so on – the truth is that feminist rape hoaxes have become so many and so transparent that the biggest rape joke ever is when a feminist cries rape.

You have doubts?

Consider the fake rape case filed against the Duke lacrosse team. Despite being exonerated and their lunatic accuser going on to be convicted of murder, feminist writers still sniff at the innocent men whose lives were tarnished. How dare those innocent men sue for damages.

Consider “1 in 5”: the feminist claim that one in five college women will be raped on campus. This number is a feminist rape hoax on a massive scale and various other studies and analyses are ripping it apart.

Consider other discredited feminist rape hoaxes.

Hofstra. ←Notice this link includes quotes and links to some chap named “Paul Elam”, then of Men’s News Daily.

Meg Lanker-Simons, a feminist at the University of Wyoming whose fake assault was motivated by feminist ideology and no real crime.

I can go on and on for days linking to deliberate feminist rape hoaxers, but you get my point: even the most well-meaning feminist (if there is such a thing) has gone batshit crazy trying to exploit rape – even when they fake it – to somehow “empower” da wymmyns.

The pitfalls of accountable power.

Women have long enjoyed indirect power over human affairs, and the great benefit of indirect power is the lack of accountability. If, for example, a bartender gives away free drinks and bar management does not detect and fire her, eventually, a tax auditor will bill the bar for the taxes due on the “free” drinks.

The problem for the bartender happens only if and when her perfidy is detected.

I believe it is something analogous to the “cheating” bartender is now happening to the rape-hoaxing feminists at UVA, and eventually, everywhere.

Although feminists still flog the idea that women are somehow inferior to men and need extravagant protections that their own mothers would scoff at, the truth is that women’s power on campus has shifted from covert to overt. Women vastly outnumber men on campus, 12 million women to 9 million men, and this differential reflects the massive power grab by feminism. The new “affirmative consent” laws further empower women at the expense of an innocent man who fails to get witnessed and notarized sexual consent for a one night stand that can turn into a deadly, life-destroying encounter by the once horny and now embarrassed vixen.

With overt power comes accountability, and with accountability comes punishment.

In this case, the powerful feminists in the sororities at UVA are being punished by a party time-out for their abuse of their power over male students. This is condign and appropriate given the girls’ negligence alone in not rebuking feminist women like Jackie Coakley for making false rape claims.

After all, on UVA and other campuses around the world, it is the women who hold power. They need to be punished when they abuse that power, just as men are held accountable.

That’s equality, right?

The fallout

Because of the sorority time-out, the nerdy & tech women (NTW) rejected by sororities gain a unique sexual advantage: the hotter sorority chicks are off-limits and so the NTW will have unique access to the full length and breadth of prime fraternity penis – access that was formerly reserved for “ho-rorities.”

Sororities are now obsolete: they’ve gone from marriage-seeking support groups to brothels to now convents. No healthy, sexually ambitious or marriage-minded woman will join a sorority if she knows this will shut her away from the dwindling supply of top-shelf, tasty big men on campus.

The uniform, across-the-board nature of the sorority party ban indicates that some other force might be in play. I would guess that liability insurers are growing weary of being sued and paying huge settlements to falsely accused men and are creating this party ban to trigger a backlash to feminist crap. Well played, guys, if this is true.

In any case, this is an early case of how women will shriek in horror once they start to grasp the burden of the overt power they now have – a burden men have long shouldered without complaint. A power burden compliments of feminism and their rape hoaxes

The days of both feminism and sorority are coming to a swift end. Unless sororities step forward and reject feminism, history will remember it as a mutual murder-suicide pact.