A new period in my life opened when I went to assist Father in his
business. True, I still accompanied him to early morning (shakhres) and
early evening (minkhe-mayrev) prayer services, but I also met with new
friends, read newspapers more eagerly and held conversations about current
events in the world. The world was changing in interesting ways. After
Poland achieved national independence, an economic upsurge began which did
not omit Semyatitsh, where Jews began to recuperate, to do business, to
work in workshops, and the situation markedly improved.

New ideas were in the air and they affected Jewish youth, which plunged
into the study of secular subjects with heart and soul. Since the high
school (hoyptshul) was in the big city, Semyatitsh young men and women
could not attend it and resorted to studying and discussing by themselves,
becoming autodidacts. In some instances one taught another or taught a
number of others. They read newly-published works in three languages,
Hebrew, Yiddish and Polish. There were libraries with books in all these
languages and new ones were established.

There were all sorts of parties in Semyatitsh, but the strongest were
the Zionist ones. Zionism in Semyatitsh had an old tradition. Our
grandfathers and greatgrandfathers had felt a yearning for Zion, which they
had expressed in prayer. The few fanatic Hasidim who were angry at Doctor
Herzl for taking the initiative to establish a Jewish state were almost
unnoticeable. They spoke scornfully of the Zionists, who believed they
could accomplish more with congresses and politics than had two thousand
years of prayer, fasting and faith.

Semyatitsh was different in that the majority of the highly observant
(frume) Jews did not regard the Zionists as heretics (koyfrim). Many pious
Jews were like my father in being both religious and followers of the
"Lovers of Zion" (khoyvevey-tsien) movement. Their piety did not prevent
the very religious Jews from speaking sympathetically of Zionism, and they
loved to tell stories of the wonders worked by the idealists, who dried
swamps, and dug wells in the bleak desert. They believed that the time
would soon come when the Land of Israel (ertsisroel) would again be a
Jewish country, "a land flowing with milk and honey," and Jews would have a
home of their own, their own land. Kheyder-boys overheard the old men's
stories and repeated them to each other with delight. Children no less
than adults hoped for deliverance (yeshue) for the Jews in Exile
(goles).

From childhood on it was clear to me that the time must someday come
when Jews would become prosperous and have a land of their own.
I was not in the least bothered by the fanatic Hasidim who
regarded the Zionists as heretics because they sought to hasten the end
(tsuayln dem kets).
(73)
My father was my best example;
he was a pious and observant Jew and yet approved wholly of all those who
were ready to immigrate to the Land of Israel (ertsisroel). By all means,
he felt, may the Exile end as quickly as possible and the Jews have their
own land. Father loved the pioneers (khalutsim) who were building the
country, and I loved the Zionist songs that the young men and women sang,
mostly on the Sabbath, when they went walking together in the woods just
outside of town.

Understandably, it was always the young people who spread the Zionist
idea in the shtetl, but there was no lack of enthusiasm among older persons
as well; they regarded going to Palestine (ertsisroel) simply as
fulfillment of a religious duty (mitsve). They took every opportunity to
speak well of those who openly declared themselves to be Zionists. The
young khalutsim profited from (hobn genosn fun) the older generation and
absorbed a wonderful synthesis of Jewish and general learning (toyre un
haskole), of Zionism and religion. In these "Lovers of Zion"
(khoyvevey-tsien) circles, the conflict between generations
disappeared.

In Semyatitsh as in all of Poland, Hekholets (Israeli Hebrew: Hekhaluts;
'the Pioneer') and Hekholets Hatsoir ('the Young Pioneer') were strong.
This movement started in Russia in 1917 and in a short time included tens
of thousands of young Jews. Enthusiastic youths founded the Semyatitsh
movement in 1924.
I was closest to Menakhem Pundik; he
and Moyshe Pinkhasovitsh were assigned to Hekholets Hatsoir as group
leaders (madrikhim).
(74)
They deepened our grasp of
Zionist thought and of the ideas of Hekholets on what we had to do in the
new period, and on aliya
(75)
as both national goal and
personal duty.

There was nothing humdrum in our discussions, but rather enthusiasm,
especially for immigration (aliya), which required cultural as well as
physical preparation. The accent fell on training for agricultural work,
for "going on hakhshore." Training farms were set up in the early 1920s in
various parts of Poland. The young khalutsim were carried away by the
vision of aliya to the Land of Israel, by the magic of the new Hebrew
songs, as well as by the idea of leading a healthy life of physical labor
in field and garden, in cattle raising and other occupations.

Hekholets developed in Semyatitsh, but not smoothly. The organizers and
group leaders worked hard and made their intellectual and organizational
contribution. There was a sharp struggle for the minds of the youth, whom
other parties, mainly the Bundists and Communists, tried to attract. When
I recall that struggle, there rise before my eyes various figures and I
remember various events, great and small, which happened to and around me,
but I don't remember everything, all the details.
Time
has wiped out not only names but dates and the sharpness of things, events,
people. But I cannot forget how we debated not only Bundists and
Communists but also Betarists and others.
(76)

We also argued among ourselves over the ways of building a country of
our own, a national home; over practical and theoretical problems; over
Hebrew and Yiddish; over Zionism and Socialism. Almost all of us came from
the yeshiva and the besmedresh. This was a transition period for us from
Talmud to secular book, from religious Jewishness (frumer yidishkayt) to
secular-national attachment -- a complete attachment to Jewish tradition
and a fervid quintessential Jewishness (pintele yid) in the heart. All
this was reflected in the discussions which we carried on heatedly.

It is hard for me to say that the problems that we argued about were
altogether clear to us. However, for the majority of Semyatitsh youth it
was clear that Jews in Poland suffered from antisemitism and therefore it
was simple and self-evident that Jews needed a national home. Building it
in the Land of Israel (ertsisroel), the land of our ancestors, was our
great ideal, one to which we dedicated ourselves with all our youthful
fervor. At that time, though the economic situation in Poland had
improved, blatantly antisemitic incidents were not rare. I would encounter
them in my trips to the surrounding towns (shtetlekh), which I visited in
connection with our glassware business. We had customers all over, and
wherever I went I heard Jews bemoaning the hatred which the antisemitic
parties had spread and which was strongly felt in dealings with Polish
officials and civil authorities.

Wherever I went I met Jews who were anxious and embittered. They had
not learned to cope with the old decrees when new ones, aimed specially
against Jews, arrived to further embitter their lives, particularly of
small tradesmen and craftsmen. The young people observed the situation
with wide-open eyes and sought solutions in the new ideologies of the day.
Some thought that socialism would bring salvation and others that communism
was the answer. They were battered by these ideas as by powerful waves in
a raging sea, and some were thrown from one wave to another, from socialism
to Zionism, and quite often to communism.

More than one Hasidic youth went straight from the besmedresh bench to
communism. Such Hasidic youths, yeshiva students, broke with religion,
became freethinkers, even heretics, and tried to fill the subsequent vacuum
in their lives with some great ideal. It seemed to them that communism
contained within itself all the ideas for the salvation of mankind. Though
at times this type of Jewish revolutionary stimulated my imagination, the
idea of communism remained foreign to me.

I was not drawn to Zionism only because I saw how antisemitism was
growing, robbing Jews increasingly of their economic base, leaving them
suspended in air. I saw in Zionism the restoration of the Jewish people,
the rebuilding and renewal of Jewish national independence. Through
joining a Zionist youth circle I became familiar with the history of the
great six-million large Jewish community of pre-war Russia, of the Russia
of the pogroms of the Tsarist period, when a great Zionist movement was
created. This movement was a thorn in the eye to the Bolsheviks, and we
knew what Zionists suffered in Bolshevik Russia and that the Zionist
movement there was being totally liquidated. This aroused my anger at the
followers of the Bolsheviks, at those who believed in them and had tied
their life and future to communism. My spiritual education had prepared me
for Zionism.

Entering the newly-organized Hekholets made me feel
that I was actively engaged in helping realize a great ideal, part of a
stychic mass process of Jewish youth on the way to self-realization.
(77)
Menakhem Pundik was the soul of the organization. He
always tried to explain to us the issues which were debated among the
various Zionist groups, and those more sharply fought -- virtually in an
ideological war -- with our bitter opponents, the Bundists and
Communists.

The debates in the Zionist camp among the various Zionist parties and
youth movements were sharp enough. Stormy meetings took place in which
practical and theoretical questions were argued, over the Diaspora and the
Land of Israel, Yiddish and Hebrew, kibbuts and moshav, large kibbutsim and
small kibbutsim, over the Arab problem and over cooperative work-forms and
many other problems which fermented among the youth in Poland and were
strongly felt in Semyatitsh as well. Tens of questions were posed in the
question evenings (kestl-ovntn 'box evenings'). Questions were asked at
the Friday night and Saturday night meetings. Though often simple, they
could also be complex, with an original and sensitive approach to the
events of the day in the Jewish and the larger world.

These were the years after World War One, when Europe was blooming with
national independence movements of small nations which had been long
oppressed. Like every social movement which grows out of deep
socio-economic causes, the national liberation movements of oppressed
peoples of that time had a democratic and at the same time a revolutionary
character. These national movements greatly influenced the Zionist
movement.

True, the existing situation of the Jews in Poland influenced us and we
Zionist youth acted from our analysis of that situation, but many around us
were affected by the national-revolutionary movements which then arose in
the political-social life of Europe; they strongly affected the thought and
feeling of Jewish youth. In our discussions questions often arose which
the older generation had wrangled over, such as the debate between
political Zionism and the Russian "Lovers of Zion" (khoyvevey-tsien)
movement, the so-called "practical Zionists," whose aim was to settle the
Jewish masses in the Land of Israel alone. I am reminded of that
particular question, since I also heard it from my father. It had
apparently occupied him in his youth when a struggle took place between
Territorialism, heir of Herzlian political Zionism and practical and
principled Palestinism (Zionists of Zion) [tsieney-tsien]. That conflict
was also loudly echoed in the then young socialist-Zionist movement,
Poale-Zion (poyle-tsien). The Uganda Project and the Territorialist
conception in general won support among large sections of the young
movement and many years later sparks of the same idea were revived.

In Semyatitsh, too, there were individuals who carried around the ideas
of the former Zionist-Socialists under the leadership of Dr. Nakhmen
Sirkin; they left the Zionist movement and joined Zangwill's Jewish
Territorialist Organization (ITO). How it happened that clever Jews,
practical and politically mature people, could accept the dreamy speeches
of the writer Israel Zangwill was a riddle to me. When I was young I
didn't think much about this. I simply rejected all such ideas and never
tried to look at them more deeply; they had no appeal for me. Years later,
when I knew a bit more about Zangwill, about his books, I examined his
ideas and his whole personality more carefully and I again concluded he was
a utopian, and I still could not grasp how his ideas captured so many sharp
minds. I will probably have occasion to raise this subject again in
connection with my Zionist activity in later years. I won't linger on this
theme here -- it has become antiquated. I bring it up because it tells us
something of the spirit of that time.

All these ideologies and the debates surrounding them tell us about
Jewish problems, about the eternal snarl (plonter) in relations between
Jews and non-Jews. In the years when I grew up, the youth in Semyatitsh
tried to find expression for their inner desires, aspirations and
discovered powers. This drive for expression made Zionist thought a form
of revolt against old ideologies and against new ones which lacked a
message of redemption. Therefore the Land of Israel was for us a concrete
territory for Jewish deliverance.
On that territory
there was taking place, stychically, the economic autonomization of Jewish
social life. The Land of Israel was thus presented both as a historical
demand and a historical need, one which was being realized from its own
self.
(78)

It now seems to me that my father, who was so sensible of the decrees
which fell upon the Jews of Poland, nonetheless regarded it as a weakening
of the Zionist idea to base it on the external force of antisemitism rather
than on the upsurge of an inner awareness. My father saw the essence of
Jewish history in the struggle to translate the thought of the prophets
into action, to realize it in life. Yet my father did not reject those
whose connection to Zionism was prompted by material need, by antisemitic
decrees. What mattered to him was the Jewish national idea (der
natsyonaler mehu's fun yid). He used to say that the Jews have a
particular nature (bezundern mehu's) which distinguishes them from other
peoples.

Menakhem Pundik formulated the same idea differently. In his talks with
us he used to say that Jews carried the feeling and consciousness of the
Jewish national genius with them from the Land of Israel, but in Exile
(goles) these qualities were reinforced by Jewish travail and need.
Persecution and oppression, Menakhem Pundik used to say, don't operate in a
void. They have no effect on a mere body (epes a fintsern guf) without
inner illumination. There is a distinct Jewish existence (kiem), a Jewish
character; there is an historical heritage which dates from the time Jews
lived as an independent nation in the Land of Israel, in the bounds and
atmosphere of national statehood.

We often had occasion to discuss antisemitism. Many young people simply
could not understand why peoples (di felker) hated Jews. Antisemitic
incidents were frequent in all of Poland, and they were encountered as well
in Semyatitsh, where they sometimes assumed menacing forms. Menakhem
Pundik did not regard antisemitism as accidental, but as the fruit of both
the Jewish and general world situations. It therefore in no way lessened
the stature of Zionism that Jewish need and persecution of Jews served as
the initial impetus for the national reawakening.

It is hard for me to remember whether Menakhem employed a special
organizational method when we founded Hekholets. His brain never stopped
working and he was sensitive as well. Perhaps he understood better than
others that Jewish life consisted of suffering and endless cruelties. He
therefore came to the conclusion that just as the distress of the masses
called forth the socialist movement, which drew its moral and practical
strength from want, from the economic decline of broad sectors of the
people, so antisemitism could power the Jewish moral renaissance. It could
be a starting point towards renewal of the life-forms of the entire Jewish
people, which could be accomplished only in the Land of Israel
(ertsisroel).

Menakhem used to formulate this with much talent.
Every talk of his stretched out for hours. He had an exceptional knowledge
of Jewish history and he sought the reasons for hatred of Jews on the one
hand in their apartness (bazunderkayt), their different manners, and the
unsubstantiality (neshomedikayt)
(79)
of their
historical condition; and on the other hand in ancient and modern human
life-forms generally. We used to swallow his words and explanations and
were glad to accept his conclusions. I remember, for example, his
explaining that from the day the Jews lost their national and political
independence in the Land of Israel, they began to live a strange life which
had no historical parallel -- the life of a landless and scattered nation.
And in their wandering they encountered an environment whose character and
soul were the opposite of Jewish traits. Thus did Menakhem draw for us the
picture of how the Jewish problem arose and how it assumed such sharp forms
on the basis of ancient and eternal antitheses between the strong and the
weak, the persecutor and his victim. People have always been full of
hatred and scorn for strangers who wander into their midst.

Moreover, among Jews there was the additional fact that just as their
weakness was considerable, no less marked was their rebelliousness.
Inhabitants of the lands to which Jews migrated saw before them a weak and
helpless people, which was at the same time stiffnecked and stubborn. Jews
lived in Poland a thousand years and the Poles did not know them, did not
understand them. The Poles deduced from the fact that Jews were persecuted
for ages that things had to be so, that they had a right to oppress them
and, moreover, they deserved to be oppressed. Their sins were inferred
from their weakness. They regarded their weakness as deserved and weakness
itself as a crime.

Our Hekholets group grew spontaneously.
(80)
New members kept joining and there were times when we
couldn't decide whether everyone should be accepted, whether they were all
suitable candidates for the training farm (hakhshore). We knew that the
Land of Israel needed tough natures and that even from among the
Tsire-tsien [Tseire-tsion 'Youth of Zion'] and Poyle-tsien [Poale-tsion
'Workers of Zion'] members who had arrived in the Land years before, only a
small portion had remained, living and working under difficult conditions.
Many had not found there the conditions and the life that they had sought.
For the most part life in the Land of Israel was too hard for them and they
did not hold out. They suddenly began to miss their homes in the diaspora
(goles). Some returned and others emigrated to other countries.

In the discussions we carried on among ourselves, some comrades
maintained we should be selective, for the Land needed personalities,
strong people with a Zionist education and hands like anvils (kovadles).
There were heated discussions over this issue, as over other issues, such
as: Were we merely a reservoir of working-hands for the Histadrut or were
we the standard-bearers who march at the head of the camp to build the Land
of Israel and there carry out a great social upheaval in Jewish life and
realize the national vision of Zionism? Should we be just ordinary
immigrants or khalutsim? Naturally, our answer was: "Khalutsim!" That
reply, most obviously, straightaway obligated us to spiritual and physical
preparation (hakhshore) for aliya. Everything within us cried out for
action. In that atmosphere we organized a training farm for khalutsim, a
kibbutz, in which we could prepare for life in the Land of Israel by
hardening ourselves physically and spiritually.

There were dreamers among us who aspired with their entire being to
immigrate to the Land of Israel to build the national home, but they were
unsuited for organizational activity and for hard labor. But there were
also those among us who, while they did not mock the dreamers, combined in
themselves dream and deed, intellect and practicality. They voluntarily
made themselves the delegates (shlikhim) of our organization in order to
get things done. Such were comrades Pinkhesovitsh [Pinchasovitch],
Tshereshevski, Menakhem Pundik, and others, who distinguished themselves in
their ability to plan and organize, to explain and to convince. They were
gentle and courteous in their relations with the members, yet they were
also firm and resolute when it came to carrying out projects and
resolutions which our group had decided on in open meetings.

The resoluteness of these comrades affected all of us, touched the
people around them. With all their stubbornness, decisiveness and
organizational ability, they did not possess even a trace of that
coarseness one finds in high-handed people (tkifim). They were not that
kind of leader. On the contrary, with their approach to work, their
comradely character, they won respect and love for themselves. We were
soon infected with their restlessness and took upon ourselves the most
difficult tasks. The same restlessness affected our work at the training
farm (hakhshore).

There were fifteen members in that first Semyatitsh
training farm and again Menakhem Pundik was the soul of the group.
(81)
His personal qualities were even more strikingly
present here. He combined in himself vision and simple gray prose,
comradeliness and love of work. We responded to him with the same
comradely affection and a readiness to execute every task laid upon us. At
the beginning our training farm was a partial one.
We
began by working several days a week in the Maliniak Brothers' plywood
factory (diktn-fabrik).
(82)
We put the money that we
earned in a common fund for establishing a training farm.
After several months we rented a small field in the region
of Slocha
(83)
and plowed and sowed it.

The work was not easy, but we were driven by an energy which had long
been slumbering in us. Menakhem's eyes sparkled and he was radiant when we
talked about the philosophy of work (der toyre fun arbet) which, in one's
own land, he believed, became sacred. He argued that if Jews did not do
their own work, then Jewish morality, which he regarded as the highest in
the world, and which went hand in hand with work, would crumble. He warned
that the highest of all positive commandments (mitsves) was to live from
one's own labor on one's own soil.
His words on work
and morality inspired us.
(84)
Decades later his words
often echoed in my ears: "A land can be acquired only through work and
creativity, and thus a healthy people with spiritual and moral values is
formed." To this day I can still see how his eyes sparkled when he spoke
of work and morality.

In the course of time, the Zionist functionaries (askonim) in
Semyatitsh, as well as large parts of the Jewish population, began to take
an interest in us. We were talked about in homes, in the besmedresh, and
wherever people congregated. We became an established fact (a firme) and
we began receiving proposals to rent this or that complex (hoyf).
We finally decided to take the place at Kayanke with its
large field area, well, barn and house.
(85)
Although
it was badly neglected, we were not frightened off. On the contrary, it
gave us the impression that we were making a fresh start.

We got to know the neighboring peasants and they promised to help us
with advice, with work tools, with food and with seed. The peasants in
that area were very poor. The Jews of the shtetl had a good reputation
among them and they related to us warmly and with trust. They believed we
would bring life to the village.

They were wonderful days, tense and joyful. Eighteen of us went out to
Kayanke, including four girls who were as enthusiastic about the training
farm (hakhshore) as the boys were. The first thing we did was to set up
temporary sleeping quarters and a kitchen; everything was very primitive.
We went right to work to clean out the well and to straighten up the
household. Several of the comrades sat down to work on the cultural
program and on the statutes (takones).
We called our
training farm "Shakharia," "Kibbutz Shakharia."
(86)
I
spent no more than two years there, but in my memory the time I spent there
seems longer, which is hardly surprising. It is not the clock that
measures time, but our store of impressions, experience. When the senses
are active and the brain is fed with the raw material of impressions, when
life is full, the clock moves slower and the time-segment is longer than
usual, fuller, and it remains in the memory as a period rich in events.

In any case, when I recall my training-farm experience, I do not measure
it by the calendar or by the pulse -- not by physiologic functions, not by
chronological time -- but by the mental activity, the conscious faculties
of the spirit, the rich world of feeling which were then mine. Life in the
kibbutz gave food for thought every hour and every minute: young men and
women with unheard of energy, stubbornness and readiness to sacrifice
themselves to realize their dream, had come together to refashion the
world.

Group-living brought with it certain problems at first. We managed
somehow with the work, but we also wished to develop traits appropriate for
kibbutz life. We were especially sensitive to instances of inequality.
The comrades were close to their homes, from which they all brought food
(produktn) packages, some larger and some smaller, which their mothers had
given them when they visited their families on Sabbaths or other free
days. This could have led to unhealthy feelings of envy. We were prepared
to overcome egoistic weaknesses in ourselves and, like many other problems,
this one seemed to solve itself in the midst of the ardor and idealism
which ruled all of us.

We lived with the feeling that we were engaged in a great and holy task
and that we were part of a great historical movement. After the enthusiasm
there followed gray workdays with difficulties which we had not foreseen.
Our means were very limited. There were days when we had no food, not even
bread. Our good parents always assisted us. I remember when my father
drove through Kayanke and brought a little package of chocolate, which he
divided among us all. We were very moved and did not know how to react.
But we did not tell Father that on that day we had not had any bread to
eat.

As I already mentioned, the neighboring peasants were good to us. On
one occasion a neighbor, a good-hearted peasant, gave us a present of a
calf for meat. Comrades immediately led it to the ritual slaughterer
(shoykhet) in town to be butchered. For quite a few days in a row we ate
meat daily. True, not often did we receive such gifts and very seldom
could we afford to buy meat. Given our income, we could not even dream of
such a thing. In time we acquired a small horse and cart, which made our
work easier. The day we moved our total possessions from our meeting place
in Semyatitsh to Kayanke with our own little horse was a great day. It
developed into a kholets demonstration, for many comrades were present and
they followed on foot singing kholets songs.

Before our eyes we saw the Land of Israel, whose wastelands we would
redeem and whose economy we would make into a model for others. We saw
ourselves as a military unit marching to battle, armed with our work
implements and a great deal of enthusiasm. Our humble village hut seemed
like our staff headquarters on the front lines.
The
young women comrades busied themselves with large pots, preparing food.
Work ceased at sunset, we ate and then finished the day
(87)
with a khaluts hora dance. The singing spread far
around.

It was not easy to establish "Shakharia." The well was neglected, the
fields wasted, the barn and the house dilapidated. We worked hard for a
long time until things were under control. Comrades and guests from town
who visited us, especially young people, used to help out quite often.
Everyone felt that we were building something in common, not only for
ourselves but for the hundreds of others who would come after us. In the
future our training farm would be a source of encouragement for scores and
hundreds of others, but in the meantime we had to work hard until our
fields could be harvested.

In order to maintain ourselves until then, we were forced to seek
temporary jobs in the vicinity. Thus we found unskilled work
(shvartsarbet) at the Semyatitsh train station. We did not take into
consideration that we were competing with neighborhood peasants, who also
sought employment at the station when not working in their fields. This
called forth opposition on the part of the peasants. The station workers
threatened to strike and we felt we were about to be attacked. But we did
not let ourselves be defeated. A Jew who for years had been a contractor
(podryatshik) at the railroad station and knew the authorities and the
workers very well, intervened, and the matter was somehow smoothed
over.

That was a victory for us and it cheered us while we plowed and sowed.
We told ourselves that our path was long and hard but that there was no
other, and that it led to the deliverance of our people (der derleyzung fun
folk). When work at the railroad station ran out, we did not despair but
sought and found work at the Dombrowa sawmill (tartak).
Six of our young men and one of our young women went
there. Other workers from the surrounding country and from Melnik were
employed in Dombrowa.
(88)
They had sufficient reason
not to stomach our presence. They didn't want any khalutsim.

We on our part knew we could not lose that work place and so there were
conflicts. Believing that without them nothing would get done, the others
decided to quit work. Since there would be no one to take their place,
their demand that we be dismissed would have to be met. However, the
son-in-law of the sawmill owner took our part. A competent professional,
he kept things going. He gave us instructions and showed us what to do.
We were eager to prove we could be relied on. This too was a victory and
it gave us additional confidence and energy.

In the Fall we harvested the grain in the fields. Our barn was full of
rye and barley from our own labor. We soon had our own potatoes, cucumbers
and tomatoes from our own fields and we were happy. But the barn emptied
as quickly as it had filled up. Debts had been accumulating and we had to
sell things to cover them. Again we had to look for work, but things were
bad and we couldn't find any. We faced a hard winter. The debts kept
growing, there was no employment. Menakhem Pundik went to Warsaw to seek
help from the Hekhaluts center. He lingered there a while and soon saw he
would get no subsidies, since the Hekholets coffers were empty. Menakhem
returned, discouraged, with empty "promises." But we didn't lose hope.

We kept on doing our chores in the house and in the field; they gave us
no income, but they helped us wait for better days. In the evenings, after
a day's work, we assembled in the house or in the courtyard, and with arms
around one another's shoulders formed a ring and sang and danced. Our
joyful singing echoed far. We were united by one and the same idea: the
only deliverance for the Jewish people lay in its own land, working its
soil with its own hands, and defending its honor and existence with its own
strength.

Before my eyes I see my comrades of that time: Menakhem
Pundik, Arn-Dovid Shoyshn [Aharon David Shoshan], Dovid-Noyekh [David
Noah] Keyles, Yoysef [Yosef] Yablon and others, the khalutsim, almost all
of whom emigrated to the Land of Israel, settled its hills and valleys to
till and revive them.

That is how we felt at moments of great difficulties, of worry and even
of hunger. We consoled ourselves with the vision of a beautiful tomorrow
in the Land of Israel. The more difficult our conditions, the greater and
stronger became our love and longing for the Land of our dreams. The
common effort of all the comrades strengthened our faith and our courage.
Years later, in Panama and in Lima, when I was already well established, I
often thought longingly that I would gladly exchange all my possessions for
a small plot of land at the foot of the Judean hills. This longing did not
come upon me at times of crisis only, but when I was relatively
prosperous. Life, however, was always a struggle for existence, full of
conflicts which pushed aside nostalgic thoughts and returned me to my daily
reality.

----------------

Chapter 19 FOOTNOTES:

73) Many Orthodox Jews regarded any human effort to
speed up Salvation, the Coming of the Messiah, the Return to Zion as
heretical, as an effort to manipulate Divine Prerogative. This is the
theme in several Yiddish works of Isaac Bashevis Singer, where "hastening
the end" may also allude to certain modern utopianisms which have proved
disastrous.
Return to text

74) M.R. writes a great deal about Menakhem Pundik
(1906-1930), who seems to have been one of the most important figures of
his youth. The tone is eulogistic -- Menakhem Pundik, having realized the
khaluts ideals of aliya and self-labor, drowned in the Kinneret when he was
very young and still fresh in Erets Yisrael. See
Kehilat
Semyatitsh
, pp. 168, 252-253 (includes photos) and passim. See the
same source for references to Moyshe Pinkhasovitsh (pp. 168, 172 [photos]
and passim).
Return to text

76) Betar is an acronym for Brit Yosef Trumpeldor.
This was the youth section of the Revisionist Movement led by Vladimir
Jabotinsky. The movement was very strong in Poland.
Return to text

77) Here we have a taste of the jargon of those days.
Ber Borokhov and others socialist-Zionist thinkers used to like to think of
immigration to Palestine as a "stychic" process, that is, an inevitable
one, one determined by socio-economic forces. Any process that there was,
of course, was principally voluntaristic. The term 'self-realization' was
part of the fixed jargon of the khaluts movements. "a stikhishn
masn-protses tsvishn der yidisher yugnt oyfn veg fun zelbsrealizirung"
Return to text

78) By invoking "stychic" processes an illusion of
clarity is achieved. This is the jargon of the period referred to above.
Return to text

79) Literally 'soulishness'. Perhaps the intended
meaning is 'centrality'. Other possibilities are 'sensitivity' and
'spiritualness'.
Return to text

88) Melnik (Polish: Mielnik) is located at point C-10
on the 1986 Mapa Administracyjna of the Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa.
Dombrowa (Polish: Dabrowa [first a is nasalized] Bialostocka [slant across
l to sound like w]) is located at point B-10 on the same map. The sawmill
and the "Shakharia" khalutsim who worked there are described in a report in
the Hebrew paper
Hatsefira
in 1927 (see Kehilat Semyatitsh, pp. 174-5).
Return to text

CHAPTER 20. POLISH ANTISEMITISM

Even though these are only my personal memoirs, in transmitting them I
am aware that they are also a biography of our generation, one which was
born in a transitional (beynashmoshes 'twilight') epoch and was dominated
by great ideals while being fated to witness the bankruptcy of almost all
of them. In addition, this generation was condemned to live through the
most terrible destruction (khurbm) of the Jewish people, the physical
annihilation of six million Jews.
Yes, a most tragic
generation, and yet rich and colorful, creative and restless; deeply
unfortunate and yet also stormy (shturmish).
(89)
When I
remember those years in Semyatitsh, I relive in my entire being
(90)
the storm in the hearts of young and adult at that
time.

We often hear complaints that the Jews did not take seriously enough the
dangers that were facing Polish and European Jewry. The truth, however, is
that as early as the 1920s, even in Semyatitsh, an alarm was sounded
alerting the Jewish masses to the dangers threatening their existence. Jews
perhaps did not try to estimate how great the danger was. Was it indeed
possible to predict the horrendous dimensions of the Shoa (khurbm)? But
most Jews understood that Jewish lives and property were threatened and
that their Christian neighbors breathed hatred and were just waiting for an
opportunity to destroy Jewish life.

The youth felt this acutely when they considered their futures. Even
before Hitler came to power in Germany and while the German Jews were still
telling themselves that Hitlerism was a passing phenomenon, Polish Jewry
already felt on its own skin the Hitlerite poison of its own antisemites.
The truth is that the Jews in Poland were extremely uneasy and their unease
grew day by day.
National Democratic Party
(91)
newspapers spewed out their virulent incitements
against the Jews. In the churches the priests held poisonous sermons. The
Polish government could not solve the economic crisis and wished to divert
the rage of the poor and unemployed against the Jews, showing that they
were to blame for all that was wrong.

Poverty among the Jews was strongly felt. Taxes were oppressive and
people sank into the mire of indebtedness and couldn't extricate
themselves. Had it not been for various institutions which provided help,
many in the shtetl would have been ruined because of debt, and who knows
what would have become of them. In addition, unemployment grew and Jewish
youth saw no way out for itself. It is not surprising that just as in
other towns and villages, so in Semyatitsh, the youth was increasingly
drawn to the idea of leaving Poland as soon as possible. Immigration to the
Land of Israel (ertsisroel = then "Palestine") was hard; there were no
certificates. Ways were therefore sought to reach other countries -- just
so as to get out of the Polish swamp.

One day while I was walking around the market place with a friend,
observing how despondent the Jews looked, I noticed a tall lean Jewish man
standing near a store, rocking lightly and muttering something to himself.
Passing him I asked him why he was talking to himself.
He looked at me with quiet amazement, his face creased with despair, and
said, "Meayin yavoy ezri?" ('Where will my help come from?').
(92)
His words cut right through my heart. Such congealed
despair, such deep woe, so hopeless and bottomless.

The year 1929 arrived and the crisis in Poland had worsened and with it
so had the antisemitism. That is how things have always been with the
Jews. As soon as the economic situation goes bad, the Jews are the first
to be picked on. The public (di gas) doesn't understand complicated
economic problems, which are matters for professionals and politicians. The
latter exploit them for their purposes. This practice was at that time
reenforced in Poland. On one side, the Communists blamed everything on the
capitalist regime, and on the other side, the right-wing parties, the
Endecki, pointed to the Jews as the bloodsuckers of the Polish people. The
Jews were the capitalists, the oppressors, the manufacturers who exploited
the Polish worker -- and they were also the Communists!

With genuine fright we watched the growing malice (rishes) of the
Poles. They, the local (heymishe) antisemites, received incendiary
material from Germany, where the Hitlerites prospered after their defeat in
the march on Munich in 1923, when Hitler was arrested. In prison he wrote
Mein Kampf, in which he described how he would take power in Germany and
conquer Europe, how he would defeat Communist Russia and destroy the Jewish
people. A theory had developed in Germany that the Reich had lost the war
because of the treason of the Jews. The forces of darkness in Germany
fused into Hitler's National Socialist Party.

At the meetings of Hekholets Hatsoir (=Hekhaluts Hatsair 'Pioneer
Youth') we discussed what was going on in Germany. We talked about Mein
Kampf, the credo of Nazism. We could not understand how the world could be
so indifferent to Nazi propaganda. It was clear to us that Nazism was
supported by the magnates, especially of heavy industry, and Hitler
therefore had the necessary funds to organize his followers, form his shock
troops, spread millions of copies of his book, as well as of The Protocols
of the Elders of Zion. Written in 1865 against Napoleon the Third, the
Emperor of France, the Tsarist police had altered and distorted this
pamphlet so as to make it appear to be the protocols of a secret Jewish
government which sought to gain control of the world. There later appeared
the book, The International Jew, by Henry Ford, the American automobile
manufacturer, which repeated most of the known antisemitic libels.

At one of our discussions, someone said that Mein Kampf, The Protocols
of the Elders of Zion, and The International Jew were a kind of trinity of
antisemitic literature which was becoming a kind of religion in the whole
Christian world. Antisemitic incitement won adherents to Hitler not only
in Germany, but in the surrounding European countries and especially in
Poland, where an open campaign was waged against the Jews -- blood libels,
prohibition of ritual slaughtering, special benches for Jewish students in
schools at all levels, and attacks on Jews in the streets in almost every
city and town. The impoverished Jewish population was squeezed mercilessly
by taxes.

The Jewish newspapers also carried news about antisemitic agitation in
the smaller neighboring countries such as Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia,
and especially Romania and Hungary. Emigration was the only remaining
solution for the Jews of Poland. I came across this desire to immigrate in
every town and village I visited in connection with our glassware
business. Everywhere I heard about the chicanery and vexations which Jews
had to suffer from the administrative power. You felt the fear of pogroms
everywhere and everywhere the youth dreamed of emigrating.

Jews in the towns became geographical experts and knew the economic
situation of every distant land. It was already known then that America
was far from being the "golden land" that it was right after the First
World War, when it had so much money it didn't know what to do with it.
Americans invested vast sums in European enterprises and the American banks
offered credit for the purchase of these shares, which rose steadily and
brought immense profits. Until one day the entire edifice crumbled. This
happened in 1929 in America. People started selling their stock shares and
the natural result was that the value began to go down. The banks and the
industrial enterprises did not have enough money to pay out the vast sums
which they were responsible for and they went bankrupt. The companies
which had invested in Europe, mainly in Germany, began to ask for their
money back, but the banks lacked funds and also declared bankruptcy.

In this manner the economic crisis moved from America to Europe. The
numbers of unemployed grew everywhere, which helped the Nazis and was oil
on the fire of their antisemitic propaganda. As want increased, it became
easier for the Hitlerites to spread their propaganda, to promise all sorts
of benefits if they were brought to power and liquidated the Jews, who were
responsible for all afflictions. It was easy for the Nazis to spread their
antisemitic incitement in Poland, where the soil was favorable for every
form of Jew-hatred (sines-yisroel). The human being is an animal that can
be trained. Some animals take long to train. Others can be trained
quickly -- such were the Poles in everything that related to Jews.

If among the Prussian population it was necessary to spend a little more
time pumping in the Junker spirit until the leaders succeeded in extracting
the type of Germans who frightened the world with the Jewish specter, the
Poles were always ready to believe all the blood libels about Jews and they
were easily incited to beat up and murder Jews. Quite quickly did the
Nazi's baiting darken the brains of the Poles and turn them into evil
beasts (khayes roes), bloodthirsty, rapt, lying in wait for Jewish victims
-- especially the poorest and weakest.

One market day in one of the towns where I used to go to meet customers
of our glassware business, I encountered a strange fearfulness. It was
being said that the peasants had been incited and were getting ready to
carry out a pogrom against the Jews. The youth had begun to organize a
resistance, but the adults asked, "What will be the outcome? The police,
who always take the part of the pogromists, will again say the Jews started
it, and there will be arrests and trials." They told of a Jewish
village-peddler (dorfsgeyer) who had taken his son along with him to a
village. When they entered the place, the Gentile boys (shkotsim) sicked
the dogs on them and father and son were horribly bitten. The peasants of
the village looked on calmly while the Jewish boy bled. They were amused at
his screaming. Father and son barely crawled back to the shtetl, bitten
and bloody. It seemed beyond endurance.

Jews saw their position afresh. Sons and daughters began seriously to
prepare to leave their homes. Mothers went about with tear-stained eyes.
On that day I returned home with the firm resolve to go out into the world
to find some ground to stand on, some prospect for rescuing my family. On
the way I met a friend from the movement who looked equally distraught. He
had been dreaming for years of immigrating to the Land of Israel, but he
had lost hope. The doors were locked. My friend was better oriented than
I in statistics, had read newspapers more than I had, and foresaw that a
tragic time lay ahead for Jews in Poland. He said the main problem was the
rising number of unemployed in the country. There were too many people, he
said. If you read the statistical tables and made comparisons with other
countries, you saw overpopulation all over, but in Poland it was
catastrophic. Overpopulation brought demoralization and incitement against
the Jews.

At home I talked with Father about the despair and sorrow of the Jews,
telling him what I had seen and heard in the shtetl I had been in. I tried
to cushion my words and made a point of mentioning my selling success. This
didn't seem to have any effect. He sat quietly and from time to time
looked at me sadly. He apparently understood my situation and knew that I
was about to say something important. It took some time before I overcame
my embarrassment and, as slowly and calmly as I could, I said: "Father,
when all is said and done, I see no way out for me here. I have decided to
leave." I thought Father would try to dissuade me. After all, I was still
needed in the business, which for the time being was doing quite well. All
my brothers were employed and had their hands full with work. To my
surprise, I saw on my father's face that he understood both my description
of the Jewish situation in Poland and my decision to leave. In a
matter-of-fact tone he said, "I have thought about this often, have hoped
that you would receive a certificate, but who knows when that will
happen."

The same day Father called together the entire family for consultation
and repeated all that I had told him. None of this was news to my
brothers. They knew the situation and were familiar with the atmosphere in
the streets. They made no effort to encourage me to have faith. True,
faith is a good Jewish quality, but there are times when faith may be a
kind of blindness -- one doesn't want to face the truth and loses his sense
of reality. The greatest news to me and to my brothers as well was
Fathers' bitter admission that he saw the situation just as I did. Father
still remembered the Polish outrages (retsikhes) during World War One and
he maintained that many years of peace and tranquility would have to pass
before the Poles washed their hands clean of blood and drove the beast of
the Poles back into latency (farborgnkayt). In the meanwhile we Jews can
be crushed in the bloody aftermaths of the post-war period. One clearly
sees the beast in the Poles and it is lying in wait for a victim. As
though speaking to himself, Father said, "Yes, children, the air here is
poisoned and Jews are blamed for every misfortune."

Thus Father clearly saw the situation of the Jews in Poland in 1929 and
with complete decisiveness said the Poles needed a scapegoat, a tragic role
to which the Jews from ancient times had special claim (khazoke). It was
that way throughout the world, especially Poland, where the ground was
burning beneath one's feet. Father and my brothers agreed that I would
travel to Panama, where my uncle, my mother's brother-in-law, already
lived. He had gone there several years earlier and apparently was somewhat
established by now. I was to look into the possibility of bringing the
entire family there.

I have never forgotten that discussion with Father and my brothers. It
is hard for me to describe the feelings which then ruled me. On the one
hand I was happy that Father and my brothers agreed that I should carry out
my decision. On the other hand leaving home made me anxious.
My brother, Shimen, turned pale and his eyes filled with
tears.
(93)
Such scenes doubtless enacted themselves at
that time in many homes, when children left for the outside world. In the
shtetl they were envied. People said: "Respectable children emigrate,
make a fortune and help their parents." Most of the grown-ups had nothing
to do and from far-off countries from time to time they received welcome
letters from children with greetings and news of having done well,
sometimes accompanied by a few dollars. That's how strangers spoke, but
parents who had to part with their sons, sighed, "May such a fate befall
the enemies of the Jews (oyf soyne-tsien gezogt); may they yet know what
it is like to be a parent and be torn from your flesh and blood while still
alive."

Yes, there were then many such homes, where the departure of sons robbed
life of its zest. People walked about like shadows, with aching hearts.
On that day longing began to gnaw at me, and continued to do so for many
years. I read the same longing on my brothers' faces and in their voices,
though they tried to appear calm and spoke with a smile on their lips. One
could almost have imagined they regarded my leaving as a natural event.
Father also behaved in the same way. He went to his business, worked as he
generally did, with energy and good humor, with the acute grasp of his deep
intelligence, with the sure logic of an experienced merchant, admired by
all his acquaintances. I, too, immersed myself in work, prepared to take
care of the formalities, passport, visa and other matters in which I was
wholly inexperienced. Because of all this I had to travel to Warsaw, a
city which I did not know at all and where I did not know my way
around.

---------------------------

Chapter 20 FOOTNOTES:

89) In Yiddish, 'stormy' is properly _shturemdik_ and
_shturmish_ is 'violent'. M.R. is influenced here by the German
_stuermisch_ 'stormy'; he evidently uses the word in a positive sense as
parallel to the earlier 'restless'.
Return to text

93) M.R. writes here "older brother," which is an
error since Shimen was younger. M.R. may have written "older" while
thinking the opposite, or he was referring to one of his two other
brothers, who were older, namely Pinye [Pinkhas] or Srol [Yisroel].
Return to text

This material is made available by JewishGen, Inc.
and the Yizkor Book Project for the purpose of fulfilling our
mission of disseminating information about the Holocaust and
destroyed Jewish communities. This material may not be copied,
sold or bartered without JewishGen, Inc.'s permission. Rights may be
reserved by the copyright holder.

JewishGen, Inc. makes no representations regarding the accuracy of
the translation. The reader may wish to refer to the original material
for verification. JewishGen is not responsible for inaccuracies or omissions in the original work and cannot rewrite or edit the text to correct inaccuracies and/or omissions.
Our mission is to produce a translation of the original work and we cannot verify the accuracy of statements or alter facts cited.