Is there anyone who believes that the National Organization of Women would ever endorse Bachmann if she became the Party Nominee for President?

I don't think they even are worried that this might further expose the hypocricy that is their organization. If they were in truth the National Orgainzation of Women instead of the Natioanl Association of Gals ( thank you Mr. Limbaugh ) , we would have seen them lauding praise and congratulations on the likes of Condoleeza Rice and Bachmann and other female Conservative luminaries.

Their silence trumpets their biased departure from their supposed mission in accord with their name to their real mission of liberal assertion of biased, partisan, take no prisoners allegiance to the single splinter issue that they have adopted in favor of the implied goals of their name.

It would be the same thing if the NAACP had stopped doing what its name implies and instead became a shill front group for the Democrat Party.

NOW has worked hard to support women who want to reject some of the traditional American values. Everyone should have a voice, so they have a place at the table IMO....but they cringe at women like Bachmann because they don't provide the sort of role model that they believe exemplifies the best woman.

Useful Searches

About USMessageBoard.com

USMessageBoard.com was founded in 2003 with the intent of allowing all voices to be heard. With a wildly diverse community from all sides of the political spectrum, USMessageBoard.com continues to build on that tradition. We welcome everyone despite political and/or religious beliefs, and we continue to encourage the right to free speech.

Come on in and join the discussion. Thank you for stopping by USMessageBoard.com!