I very much appreciate what this post hascontributed to our discussions here.

I would only add that, if anyone sincerelyfeels that any of my research is seriouslyflawed, the criticisms should be posted here,in an honest and constructive manner,with sufficient specifics to permit arebuttal.

This will give me an opportunity to supportthe statements of mine, which one or morepeople may feel are flawed for one reasonor another.

In this way, we can advance our knowledge together.

However, to say that my research is"seriously flawed," but then to neglect thespecifics, does a very serious disserviceto everyone.

BTW, compare the cost of mailing literallyhundreds of certified letters, with thecost-effectiveness of email. Isn't thisthe major reason why email has become sopopular?

On the copyright question, consider theevidence we have found, as the tip of a bigice berg. The various copies and links areno different from the fingerprints of somany criminals.