Any chance that one day someone reviewing a remake might take the time to properly look at the improvements and changes made, rather than re-review a game that's been out for yonks? I'm fairly sure game reviews don't have an expiry date...

Had mine since last week, waiting to watch the final movie so there's no chance the ending could be spoiled through comical LEGO japes. Tempted to pop it in based on the linear gameplay of the first Potter game but...

Would it have been too much to ask for some mention of the HD part? Such as, I don't know, what the fucking graphics look like? This review is as much use as reviewing, say, remastered Beatles albums and saying, "They have been remastered. Sgt Pepper's is an amazing album and Lennon could write a song".

Are there achievements?

This review is recycled from when the game first came out bookended by two new paragraphs, isn't it? Reply-1

Gratz to our lads who done well; if Razz actually bags the telly his will be the place to crash after the geekmeet!Maybe it's just me and my solitary hour of sleep but I couldn't make any sense of how the competition unfolded. Perhaps One of the winners influenced the author... Reply0

If you just take the actual words quoted in the article then, personally, I can't see a flaw in the reasoning. Guys in war movies do it with sticks and sand. Why not use a 3D simulation which gives particular care to representing ways of causing maximum carnage? Reply0

If a locksmith came and changed the lock on your front door and left the master key in the lock, would you really blame the kid who went in and watched your telly or the person who utterly failed in their job responsibility? For anyone not having fantasies of a sexual relationship with the locksmith - if I was the locksmith I'd be putting a restraining order on NotSoSlim - the blame would not lie with the person who took a dodgy opportunity.

No crime was committed, other than one of monumental stupidity and incompetence.

Crying "wah, wah, the hackers dun bad" just makes one come across as phenomenally naive. Reply-5

@pat - the Nazis carried out the attempted liquidation of a race of people. This is what sets them apart. Stalin and Mau may have presided over the deaths of millions more people but they were not designing special equipment to more efficiently eliminate human beings from existence. They were not killing in the passions of combat, they were kiling in the calmness of industry. The Nazis were on a different level and that is why they continue to be special. Reply-1