102 Hickory dickory dock there's a radio in this clock. Most clock radios are radios with clocks in them This Is a clock with a radio in it. It wakes you up to commer- cials just like a big clock radio. But it takes up less than 5 inches square of space So you get a lot more night table. And a lot more clock to look at But you don't spend a lot more money. In spite of its rich-looking wal- nut-looking finIsh, it costs just $19.95. * We want it to wake you. Not break you. SONY 6RC-23 14 :{ ,:<c." ",' .., f . ..- . - .. I ", & ;v "'" ""' .{ SONY v r ! w" <( ø-:> )- "'- ,.; 'r-.. ^ I "'""- , .0. ." /" t" :i;:: ; ; :. -ø,,,i ::.. . grlð * .::'." '\ . ...>>.... ,<<, :.- @ 1968 * Mfr $ $J.)gg sled ret d pIce .. wrùom 585 HUh AV:!!:nu N Y \...., , \\ . v(. ; ; :: _' ""1 After the swim is over. . >'-", ,i:" By Oleg Cassini '-, for Sea Mark /..' ..><' ,...' \ , %, :/'/. .., ;. j ":" \, -"'- :if ' r .. Ý ./ -- , "'J" # ..... ti . iJ" .... , . >. ,.:.' y :.>;;;w- \ v \\, \ i:':';'".( OJ ' /\ I' --t. i ;... /' ., . ...... ...' .<>.. .w# . , -- .. .... I. t ';.. , . ,,:. I '1 I . I' t. " \. f . ./ ."; .', ") . .; ././ < \ .:., _ " " ;!ri -" h'" ..{...:..-;"" ... ' '- . ,. \ . . =" .. :., . ... . "',... ..: ).;... ,\ . ..- '.. n "''-, .-:x , t . .. " "' , , .......'t'<. ,......... ,", , . -" / \ . " { \' ,: ,., .I'"\. <0- r ". -.. ".': ... \' .: S .:\ \ \ -.. 0" " L '" _,*f \ ;- \ "yß \ ---,.., ,/ , " , '\, ">W ,, ..... "Baggie Pants" of two-ply polyester I cotton by Galey & Lord- a division of Burlington Industries at Burlington House, New York, N. Y. 10019. mInd, an Embassy official rephed, somewhat rIghteousl) , "We never in- volved ourselves in the substance of negotiations-that was between I.P .C. and the Peruvian government." Yet the United States had staked its na- tional policy toward Peru on the out- come of these negotiations. By fail- ing to become "involved," the United States virtually entrusted the future of that policy to the negotIators for I.P .C. If they did not agree with the Peruvian government, Peru would receive virtually no aid froln the United States. Even after 1966, when aid was resumed, there is no evidence that the United States even trIed to persuade I.P .C. to modify its terms, although, on the other hand, We constantly remInded Belaúnde that any action resembling expropriation would call down the wrath and retaliation of the United States in the forln of the Hickenlooper Amendment. \Vhen I.P .C. offered, in 1 968, to turn ovel La Brea y Pariñas-a proposal that would probably have ended the en tIre dispute a few years earlier-a high Embassy official reports, he was "as- tonished at their generosity" when he was "told" of their intention. I.P .C.'s natural and warranted im- pression that it was backed by the full weight of the UnIted States undoubted- ly stiffened the cOlnpany's attitude, just as it restrained, and perhaps intÌ1ni- dated, the Peruvians. Ironically, this Ì1npression Inay have actuaHy been a disservice to the .oil COlnpany, leading it to an unjusti- fied belief in its safety from arbitrary action. Throughout this whole period, many outside observers and SOlne U.S. officials knew that a serious clash was always a possibility. Perhaps if the United States had acted as 2 neutral and actively influential mediator, an earlier agreement might have fore- stalled the present crisis. Certainly we could have tried, as we have done suc- cessfully in reconciling disputes between American enterprises and other coun- tries of Latin America. I.P .C., after all, was a business, and It behaved as a business. On the other hand, it was the State Department's job to ex- amine questions of wisdom and justice, and to measure the strengths and haz- ards of Peruvian nationalism dgainst the clear American interest in a friend- ly and developing Peru. Signs of the failure to do this are everywhere. Even though the two top Embassy offi- cials have given more tIme to this ques- tion than to any other aspect of U .S.- Peruvian relationships, up to a few w eks ago there was no United States