>RDF represents quite a contrast to RSS; where RSS is simple and
>straightforward, RDF is quite complex; where RSS has been
>implemented a number of times and works well, RDF (as far as I know)
>has yet to be implemented.
>>Personally, I think RDF as it is today will never be implemented;
>it's far too obscure and complex for the benefits it offers. I work
>with one of the co-authors of the spec; we argue about this all the
>time.
Pete,
Those last two sentences are very enlightening! Thanx