[IMG]http://wsphotofews.excite.com/010/v5/9f/Hz/rJ89766.jpg[/IMG]
1st Generation New Haven CT Manufacture,
Original Factory Swelled Target Grips
Very Early Production Model HD-
Will shoot 1 hole groups if you can-
Totally Competition Worthy
Spendy though....
If you are looking for a knock-about like a Ruger or something, this isn't for you.
Otherwise, e-mail
Landon_in_Florida@yahoo.com

I picked up a Kimber 22 conversion in a deal I just made. Slapped it onto an AMT 1911 frame I have and damn if that sucker doesn't shoot pretty well.
I was surprised it cycled because it felt awfully rough on that frame, but it does work.

I've heard Browning Buckmarks are good for the money. I think it has a better accuracy than the Ruger Mk II.
I've owned Ruger Mk IIs, they're PITA to take apart and put together.
If you have the $$, might want to consider a used S&W Model 41. Don't get the new ones due to the backstabbing S&W did to us gun owners.

Revolver, go with a S&W K-22. It's as accurate as they come. Auto, if you are low-ending, get a Ruger with a bull barrel.
I inherited a Colt Targetsman with a 6" barrel, an outstanding match shooter, but they cost a helluva lot.
Just my humble rimfire opinion . . .

IMHO,the Browning BuckMark is a hell of a well put together semi-auto. The accuracy is fantastic open sighted or with one of the many other sight options! Bought mine over five years ago, bought the S&W first ,after one magazine put it back in the box and traded it in on the Buckmark Plus. At $300.00 that was not my idea of a low end .22. Ben