Now let me know how many of those ended on freak plays, blown call, or the inability to throw a forward pass to wide open receivers as a result of the play call?

We have been on the wrong side of fortune and frankly still had chances we didn’t capitalize on, but if you think changing the coordinator with a redshirt sophomore quarterback is the right idea than you belong in Lions and Bears management.

I’m not saying play calling has been perfect or even good in many games this season but with the youngest team in college football we have no idea how much that was a factor.

But most people won't. Higdon is the type of back that is just going to get better and better and quite frankly I wish we would shorten the rotation to two rbs for majority of carries. Higdon plus 1, whoever it is better than a rotating 3-4 as that can see and learn faster.

OP, in my opinion the answer to your question is an obvious yes, however the real question would be feelings if we won all but, OSU.

To that my answer would still be a begrudging yes, if we also win a bowl. I can't stand losing to both main rivals and only beating Rutgers, but the youth, combined with being on our 3rd string quarterback to me would make any 10 win season a good one.

I hate saying that, but am excited to see the experience and growth these young guys are getting and they are getting better. If you look back before the spring game hype this would be in line with most and better than some predictions.

For the last two years. Our quarterback is hurt and we have freshman receivers. See the difference?

Don't get me wrong I'm not happy but there is a clear gap in some people's memory. Our OL has been awful for a while. Harbaugh hid it for two years, missed some things, missed out on others, and ultimately we don't have the experience in other positions to hide it this year.

What has been troubling? We saw a spring game where Peters looked good, we didn't see the spring like the coaches did. It was an open competition for a long while and then narrows down to Speight and OK with Speight winning out.

At this point without question Speight is and was better, just not what we hoped he be, yet. So the coaches started the better player and now their doing the same or Peters is in the doghouse.

Either way what is arbitrary about that? My guess is your going to say your arbitrary analysis of Peters after seeing the spring game. Perhaps it was Peters best day by far at any point or perhaps he has regressed since. Just saying that I think we have seen the best playing and if they aren't they're is a reason.

Crushing Florida 2x were big games, beating WI at the big house last year was a big game, crushing Penn State Last year was big. Beating State anytime is big.

We shit the bed vs Iowa, lost in a State choose your adventure dream win 3 years ago, lost in a monsoon this year and invited 3 locals to fuck us in Columbus last year, which they did.

We lost some games we shouldn't have, we lost some games we all wanted to win, but to say we have no big wins is silly.

We have two seasons in a row of 10+, We're 5-1 with the youngest team in America and have a legitimate shot in any game we play. Enjoy the season and stop writing revisionist history on "Big Games" we will win our share.