A federal judge ruled Tuesday that the Trump administration must continue to accept new applications for the program that protects undocumented young adults, which is called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), from deportation.

The Washington Post and The New York Times reported that Judge John D. Bates of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia issued a ruling that the government’s decision to end the program was decided on the “virtually unexplained” grounds that the program is “unlawful.”

Advertisement

Similar to the other rulings, Judge John Bates concluded that the wind-down of DACA was "arbitrary and capricious" because the Department of Homeland Security failed to "adequately explain its conclusion that the program was unlawful." The judge also accused the government of providing "meager legal reasoning" to support its decision.

The New York Times reported that the judge stayed his decision for 90 days to give the Department of Homeland Security the chance to better explain its choice to end the program.

A George W. Bush appointee to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Bates delayed the implementation of his ruling "to allow the agency an opportunity to better explain its rescission."

In response to the ruling, the Justice Department said it stands by its original reasoning, calling DACA an "unlawful circumvention of Congress," and that it intends to continue making its case to the courts.

"The Department of Homeland Security therefore acted within its lawful authority in deciding to wind down DACA in an orderly manner," spokesman Devin O'Malley said in a statement. "Promoting and enforcing the rule of law is vital to protecting a nation, its borders, and its citizens. The Justice Department will continue to vigorously defend this position, and looks forward to vindicating its position in further litigation."

The DACA program, which protects young undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children, has already been resumed after President Donald Trump sought to end it in September, after two federal judges issued nationwide rulings to accept renewals of the two-year permits issued by the program and after the Supreme Court declined to circumvent the appeals process to overturn those decisions.

But while the DHS has been processing renewal applications under those rulings, as the appeals make their way through the courts, Tuesday's ruling was the first to order the program to resume accepting new applications -- potentially opening the program to tens of thousands more immigrants than the roughly 700,000 currently protected.

In September, the administration defended ending the program by saying it was likely to fall in the courts anyway and arguing a six-month wind-down of the program would be more orderly than a sudden end brought by the courts. But no court has found DACA to be unconstitutional.