DO NOT make arguments for or against a work in this thread. That should be done in the above mentioned threads.

Providing links for works that have a specific thread already are ok, however don't add links to posts in the work-specific thread (since that would be redundant.) Links should once again only come from the threads mentioned above.

Please provide the name of the work that is being referenced, as well as a direct link to the post in question. To get a direct link, click on the time-stamp above the post you want to link to, then copy the url from your browser address bar.

Links to arguments for or against cutting a work are fine, as long as they contain meaningful content about the work in question. "I think this should stay", and "This seems like paedo-shit to me!" without further elaboration are not useful here, nor are arguments over the P5 guidelines in general.

Arha will be reading this thread and editing the provided links into the post(s) immediately below this one. Please follow any additional instructions Arha may give you.

Before providing a link, please check to make sure that the link isn't already listed in one of Arha's posts below.

Questions, corrections, and suggestions about how this thread is run are ok, but keep the discussions as concise as possible. Any posts that don't involve this thread's maintenance or provide the types of links we are looking for will be hollered for being off-topic.

Pages Brought Forward For Review

Any works that have strikeouts through the title are considered resolved for the moment, though they are subject to appeal if convincing new evidence is brought to light. Please do not make these arguments in this post and instead refer all petitions to this thread instead. The list of the remaining resolved pages can be found here.

Any discussion that has moved to a separate thread will stay in the list and a link to the discussion in question will be added.
The links below belong to works brought forth as a concern to the P5.

I checked the first 25 pages of the Content Violation Discussions page. It was mostly just debating over how we were going to do things and thus easily passed through, but I did put in some updates. I have the time to keep this all updated, but that's not the same as going through every page of the relevant threads myself. This thread needs more people to find any objectionable material: I can't do it all alone. If you are willing to search a particular section of the thread or have a specific post to link to now is a good time to come forward or PM me or Meeble.

(I'm not sure why a 12 year-old angsting about other girls developing breasts before she does counts as lolicon, isn't that typical in coming of age girl fiction? EDIT: Oh I see, for some reason he thinks the characters are kindergarten students?)

Good job so far everyone. Since there are only so many works that I can review at any given time, I felt that a lot of good analysis by the people participating in these Content Violations threads was being missed.

This will make things a lot easier for me once I begin reviewing the works that are listed, since I can go to one location and easily find the scattered discussion points related to those works.

Community

Tropes HQ

TVTropes is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org. Privacy Policy