Locke wrote that all individuals are equal in the sense that they are born with certain "inalienable" natural rights. That is, rights that are God-given and can never be taken or even given away. Among these fundamental natural rights, Locke said, are "life, liberty, and property."

Locke believed that the most basic human law of nature is the preservation of mankind. To serve that purpose, he reasoned, individuals have both a right and a duty to preserve their own lives. Murderers, however, forfeit their right to life since they act outside the law of reason.

Locke also argued that individuals should be free to make choices about how to conduct their own lives as long as they do not interfere with the liberty of others. Locke therefore believed liberty should be far-reaching.

I agree that what Locke says about rights is true.

This moral relativism of yours is exactly what lets government take this freedom, then that freedom, until we have lost them all.-SnarkySack

You claim to be an animal then, but want to be recognized as having human rights?

I have never claimed to be any extant non-human animal, but humans are animals, which makes it difficult to reply to your claim without falling into the trap you've presumably set.

I remember half-jokingly suggesting that I was a dragon, which, if it existed, would be an animal (rather than a plant or a mushroom). Same goes for Vulcans, who are technically not only animals but actually humans, since they can breed with them. Come to think of it, I'm never going to suggest I'm a Vulcan again. That's too close to human for my tastes.

I just said I didn't want rights if I have to say the right things to get them.

You are fully serious in your belief that your "intellect" is superhuman.

Just act human and people will generally respect your rights as a human. Libertarians will anyway, and the classical liberals. Authoritarians of all stripes will continue to deny you the exercise of whichever of your rights interfere with them taking power and keeping it.