Saturday, 23 February 2013

The Pythia Syndrome

“You keep saying that you were all, your blog included,
masterfully used, abused and exploited, so I suppose when you realized that it
made you angry…”

“On the contrary, dear, you know, one should never cease to
recognize excellence when one happens to come across it, even if one sees it in
one’s adversary, which was the case. I must say, the way we were manipulated
neared perfection.”

“You almost sound like you enjoyed getting beaten…”

“There’s no shame in losing as long as one has fought with
all one’s strengths and one’s convictions, and when one is defeated on such
terms then one can claim the laurels that time will reward one with.

History is
filled with heroic defeats and in most of them the victor has little or no
relevance.

Besides, we didn’t lose anything as I’ve told you it was a
war that was never ours to lose. The Great Maddie War (GMW) was between the BHs themselves and between the whole lot of them and time.

Besides, if you insist on interpreting me saying that I was
manipulated with me saying I lost, is there any shame losing a game to a chess
grandmaster? No, it was a privilege to have been able to play against him.

We were the pawns in that game and it was just a sheer
delight to see how well we were played!”

“Pawns?”

“Never underestimate the power of the pawn as there’s no other
piece on the board that is as selfless and that can change the outcome in just
that moment when it transforms and becomes something else including the
powerful Queen.

A pawn is the most often sacrificed piece on the board and
always for higher interests than its own so that makes it simply the noblest
piece of all.

Like the pawns we are, we citizens, should never, ever,
lose sight of our dignity and our importance, and sometimes we do just that.

At Textusa we’ve tried to remind people of that fact.

What differentiates people is their spine verticality and
not the colour of their blood, which, by the way, is red in all cases, although
some do think wrongly that money or a family name alters that fact.”

“Now I’m really confused. You say you were pawns in trenches
filled up with deceiving BHs in a war that wasn’t yours to win?!? Where is the
sense in that?!?”

“First get your analogies right, you either say soldiers in
trenches with BHs right next to us and using an identical uniform or say pawns
in a chess game where “white” pieces were black ones with just a coat of
paint.”

“But that means you were being fooled most of the time!”

“Yes, that is correct. Not most of the time but up to a
certain point of time. No shame in admitting that.”

“When was that?”

“That’s something I have to still decide if I’m ever to
reveal. But I can tell you it was much before the “Last Call” post.

As I told you yesterday, Textusa was a late comer.

I was quite confused when I started reading blogs in the
early days, as they seemed to hate each other more than the McCanns, who I
thought were the supposed wrongdoers!

I soon became suspicious of them, but couldn't work out who
were what we call BHs.

Then reality dawned on me but having that knowledge did me
no good as I couldn’t use it, so I played the dumb blond.”

“Why couldn’t you use it?”

“Because they had glorified the fake WH to a point that if
one went even slightly against their dogmatic truth it was considered that one
was committing nothing short of the worst possible blasphemous heresy.

Look how much flak the blog took in exposing Mrs Fenn, and
it didn’t come from the expected sources. Remember how many “I just can’t see
why she…” did we read?

And because they “couldn’t see IT”, IT couldn’t be. That
simple and dogmatic.

There was an overall deceit. It had to be that way to have
us all convinced into pointing our guns to empty trenches like we did for so
long!

You say we were fooled, I say we were masterfully played.

Once understood what really was going on it became quite
amusing to watch.

I grew quite fond of the word “pretendy”. As in “pretendy”
friends, “pretendy” enemies, “pretendy” fights, “pretendy” fall outs… you name
it and you just had put a “pretendy” behind it to quickly understand the
developments of the game.

My favorite? The “pretendy” ego-fight.

Delicious to watch people seemingly fighting for importance
and recognition and then “falling out” when it was all but a justification for
a change of “status” of one of the parties.

A true world of make-belief because it was indeed to make you
believe in it!

But you know what? At the end of the day, it all comes down
to how each one of us manages our own conscience.

Each one of us is only able to act according to what each
one’s conscience dictates.

We all carry our burden of sins but if there’s a thing we
all know is that person who we all see on the other side of the mirror will
never go away.

In my case, as that person and I share the same conscience,
I try to keep it as clear as possible.

Doing some things only denotes lack of conscience and,
honestly, we’ve come across some people who sure seem like they’ve forgotten to
pick up that particular item when they came into this life.”

“You seem to have spotted many…”

“Well, we do hope we’ve spotted them all, or at least the
most relevant ones. We keep our opinions to ourselves on who our opponents
are and enjoy observing their tactics.

Many, I’m sure, are wondering today if they have been caught
out or not, but that’s their problem, not mine.”

“Their problem?”

“It’s a matter in the area of personal conscience. Waiting
for a person with no conscience to gain one through your words is as
intelligent calling someone stupid.

The stupid, because they’re stupid, don’t know they’re
stupid and will fail to comprehend, irrelevant of the ways and times one explains
and the “pretendy” stupid know it to be a false statement so one is being stupid just for having said it.

The same, or almost, goes with people with no conscience. It
won’t be by one’s words that will make them have one.

On the contrary, when you tell a conscienceless person s/he
has no conscience what you end up doing is triggering a defensive mechanism
whereby s/he will come up with the most shameless of explanations to justify
having done what they did when they knew very well how wrong they were when
they did it.

People with no conscience will never be sorry for what
they’ve done. Sorrow is a sentiment they’re only able to feel when they’re
caught out and that’s because they regret not having been able to fly under the
radar and not because the harm they have eventually caused.

But not all BHs are devoid of conscience, much to the
contrary, it’s what has tormented them all these years into being resilient
BHs.”

“Explain please…”

“Well, you have to understand the diversity and the heterogenic
nature of what constitutes what we now call BHs.

I’ve taken 4 days to explain to you the macro-picture of the
Maddie Affair, right?”

“Right”

“Now within that big overall picture you have hundreds of
personal stories and different kinds of motivations.

For starters you have two major groups within the Black
Hats, the defensive and the offensive groups.”

“Offensive, defensive?”

“Ok, let’s look at the players involved. You have basically
two sets of people, the T9 and the others.

The difference between them is that it’s within the T9 that
lies the secret as to how Maddie died. We know that, but most importantly the
“others” do too.

Let’s be really benevolent with all involved and let’s
suppose all of them want to do right thing. Note the present tense, please.”

“Ok”

“So imagine that within the Tapas 9 whoever had
responsibility for Maddie’s death had wanted to own up on that night, could
they have done so?”

“See no reason as to why not… no wait, if they did that the risk of exposing the apple tree would be too great, so, no, they couldn’t!”

“That’s right! Not saying that is what happened mind you,
just raising all reasonable possibilities because that is what we must
continuously do.

The others, or the Guests, Ocean Club and the Event’s
Organizers, “forced” the forging of the child’s death because “higher interests”,
theirs, were at stake.

They knew that what they were doing in that week wasn’t
illegal It just wouldn’t be “accepted” by the general public if it ever
happened to be known. But they knew that to assure that didn’t happen what they
decided to do was illegal.

So you have these two groups, the first, even if it wanted,
couldn’t own up because the other wouldn’t allow it.

As I’ve repeatedly said in the blog, swingers are absolutely
normal people who find pleasure in expressing their sexuality in a different way
which they’re absolutely entitled to. They’re not perverted or evil.

Due to the exclusive nature of the event happening in Praia
da Luz, this particular group of swingers was of made up of upper class people.

That’s a very important characteristic about this particular
group. If society was a cake made up of a hundred layers the people in this
group belonged to the top-half of the top layer.

We’re talking about 0,5% of the population of any country,
around 310,000 people in Britain, 50,000 in Portugal, although as far as we
understand there weren’t any Portuguese involved in this particular swinging
event.

This means many things.

First of all that they’re people who’ve succeeded in the cruelest
world of all, the world of success. They’re used to having their own way and in
getting what they want. The concept of hearing a no for an answer is unknown to
them.

Secondly that their success makes them look at the rest of society
as one enormous unhygienic herd whose sole purpose in life should be to look up
to them in permanent jubilation about their success. This success, which may have the
most diverse origins such as commercial, intellectual or artistic, is always
translated in worldly possessions, or in a clearer terminology, as material
wealth. We should bow at their passage and aren’t even worthy of breathing the
same air they do. Literally the XXI’s Century’s nobility.

Thirdly that this class-centric, or elitist, aspect in the way
they look at life makes them tend to overlook the sins of their own
"pack", finding these little “peccadilloes” to be quaint or even
amusing. All of them know some sort of little secret about everyone else but
these excesses are not only tolerated but accepted.

Fourthly and last but not least, that they’re people with the right
and powerful connections, for all them share, as I said just now, a commonality
of sinfulness. Not saying they all sin the same way but that they all do sin so
more than just accepted the sins are defended.

They tend to protect their own kin, fiercely. They very
quickly close ranks and protect each other in the best “what happens in Vegas
stays in Vegas” style.

Now you have this particular group of upper class people, who
have on their conscience that the death of a little girl is to go without justice. It’s one
heavy burden to carry around, especially when one is witnessing the
glorification of those who should be constricting themselves!

What has happened is that to appease their own guilty
conscience they, and their friends, have set on crusade to bring the
McCanns to justice.

A very fierce and determined crusade. They are the BH on the offensive. The Tapas, including the McCanns but not limited to them, are the onesdefending, literally, their lives.

BHs fighting for their lives against other BHs set on the fiercest crusade against them.”

“That’s good, no?”

“It would be if they sought justice. By wanting only an amalgamated
collation of specifically selected parts of both justice and truth they not
only achieve neither but hinder further the finding of both.

It’s a common fact that the worst lie is a half-truth and
they certainly don’t even want half the truth to come out.

They just want the
part that incriminates the McCanns and the Tapas. Which, by the way, we believe
it have been the whole truth back in the early evening of may 3rd, 2007, but
that at the end of that same evening no longer was with the “abduction”
decision.

They want the best of two worlds, truth and justice, but
only the best as in their best interest. It’s a greedy want…”

“You can’t be on good terms with the devil and God
simultaneously they say…”

“Exactly, they don’t seek justice as they don’t want the
whole truth to be revealed but only those parts that interest them, which they think
will cleanse their soul and wash away the “blood” from their hands.

But it won’t as it’s a task with as much chance of success
as the SY Review as no matter how much they wash it away there will always be
traces of guilt.

They have the Apartment
5A as an example. It was meticulously cleaned, maybe too
meticulously, and still the dogs found compromising traces.

It’s one stain impossible to remove because they’re overlooking
the fact that the only crime it proved to have happened is the one they
committed, together with the McCanns and the remainder T9, a crime with implications
and ramifications well beyond the crime scene.”

“The Apartment
5A?”

“Oh no, not only the apartment. The crime scene was all over Praia da Luz. That’s where we’re certainthe crime of
perverting the course of justice by unlawfully disposing of, destroying or
concealing a body was committed.

The only crime we’re certain to have happened inside Apartment 5A is that
of obstruction of justice which was what the meticulous cleaning was in reality.

We’re not even sure if it was there that the abduction
theory was concocted and about Maddie’s death, fatal accidents are an
unfortunate often recurring reality worldwide.

And what has happened now is that you have a group of people
who never in their lives thought of becoming what they’ve become: criminals.
Obstructing justice is a crime and we all know it is.

And this group of people, albeit their collective
class-centricity and their multiple egocentricities, have collectively gone bad, some even
to the point of evilness.

They’ve made their crime worse with each passing day by
involving more and more people and institutions into the mess.

And worst of all, they’ve resourced the public persecution
of two people, Goncalo Amaral and Tony Bennett. I don’t know if it was the
result of a scare-tactic campaign that went out of control but whatever it was,
a lot of money has been spent in deliberately harming two people who all know
are just believers of truth and justice.

And because we at Textusa have worked on unveiling the whole
truth to seek justice without absolutely any restrictions we’ve been cast with
a kind of PythiaSyndrome.”

“The what?”

“The Pythia Syndrome. Something I have just invented. Like Pythia we’re said to be, by the “out-of-the-closet” BHs, tin-foil hatted, barking mad and under effect of hallucinogenic mushrooms and
by the other BHs, or as we like to call them, “WH”, to be rogue with a writing style that is
but an incomprehensible, infinitely long and pointless gibberish.

Your obsession with the non-existent "Insane" is symbolic of your obsession with a non-existent "cover up of unseen proportions and scope".

I'm not the poster in question, but I remember the post from which you started calling the person "Insane". It was clear from the context that "insane" was a comment on one of your batty posts, not a signature, but now you have devoted a considerable proportion of your home page building up this non-existent persona. Someone somewhere must be laughing their a**e off.

Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Feb 22, 2013, 11:38:00 PM”

You can't imagine the times we've been threatened by that terrible threat
that a group of unknown people will be laughing at us. I think only kids
at school are affected by that taunt. We sometimes get a version of - my dad's bigger than your dad too!

The Pythia of Greece delivered Oracles. The usual theory has
been that the Pythia delivered oracles in a frenzied state induced by vapors
rising from a chasm in the rock, and that she spoke gibberish which priests
interpreted as the enigmatic prophecies preserved in Greek literature

Basically she was considered bonkers, a fantasist, very much
like Textusa has been considered by many renowned “White Hats”. A basic but
powerful tool to subconsciously implant a negative image of us, keeping people
from coming to read the blog and those who do to have a bad impression before they
even “set a foot” in our blog.

People use those derogatory adjectives for some reason,
which I think are personal. They don’t want the whole truth out there but do want to
see "justice", their justice, served.”

“Truth can’t be tailored to one’s desire!”

“Try telling them that. Anyhow what they forget is that
labeling us with a sort of a Pythia Syndrome they’re actually paying us a
huge compliment.”

“By transforming insult into a compliment?”

“No, we don’t need to transform anything. Their insult is really
a compliment. A big one at that.

Pythia was said to be mad, but a mad seer. It was indeed said
she spoke gibberish but it’s also a commonly accepted fact that she was a very
important Oracle to the Greeks.

Some recent scholars maintain she spoke coherently. What may
seem gibberish to some but makes perfect sense to others.

In our case the fact they make an extra effort in shouting as
loudly as they can into the seven winds, as the Portuguese say, that we speak
nothing but gibberish only tells us what they’re trying to do is give their
best to avoid others seeing the perfect sense we’re making.”

“You, an oracle… never thought I was marrying one! And what
does the “oracle” foresee as the outcome of all this mess?”

“Well, I don’t know. As I’ve been saying, the Maddie Affair
has had the following crucial milestones:

- May 3rd, 2007, in which Maddie died and in which the
decision to go for the abduction theory was taken;

- Uncertain date, most likely in June 2007, in which
Maddie’s body was disposed of and in which it was “decided” to go after the
McCanns;

- September 17th, 2007, in which it was reluctantly accepted
that it was impossible to bring down the McCanns without involving others and
in which it was decided to launch the largest demotivational campaign the world
has ever seen, using all platforms through which communications flowed.

- May 12th, 2011, on which the decision was implemented to
go after the McCanns again. Notice I don’t say it was a renewed attempt as the
only thing in common with the decision made in 2007 is the McCanns, as those
who took the decisions and the motives with which they made the decision were
completely different in 2010/2011.

- Uncertain day, uncertain month, uncertain year, in which
SY will present the results of their Review..

The last milestone will be, obviously, the most important
one and the one history will register.

We believe that the presentation will be more of an
anti-presentation, something of the sort that the 195 new leads lead nowhere
and the case is to remain archived and due to its sensitive nature the SY
report will not be released publicly.”

“That will be a scandal!!”

“What do you want me to tell you? Haven’t you noticed how
the whole world has turned upside down on Maddie’s world?

Not all ethylene gas emissions from all geologic chasms in
the earth that supposedly caused the Pythia's state of inspiration to
"connect with the divine" could anyone see any sense in all of this
or be able to predict with probable causality the future on this matter besides
what I’ve just told you we think will happen.

Anything different from what we, the "Oracle", predicted on Feb 17th, last year, will surprise us.”

95 comments:

"Quite: TextUSA is among a group of dedicated Bloggers who are adept (sometimes!) with words, and can be persuasive and convincing on occasion, but their theories are, in truth, no more helpful or realistic than the many others that arise from those of us seeking to form a view based on available information. Some are downright drivel."

I've been reading the posts here (or trying to read and understand as well).Certainly my reading and understanding will fail. Think and reason without talking with others, leads me to create misunderstandings.Talk and exchange ideas personally is the best situation because corrects errors of interpretation, because the posts are on the special construction of the text.I feel that the posts on this blog make us think and see the facts even further. But I write this is nothing new.

Today, I felt it was easier to read. It seemed all very well aligned.Having the privilege of coming here and trying to assimilate content makes me well.

Sorry write telegraphically but is also because of google translator. (but also because me, i write like that)

My idea with my comment was to illustrate how Textusa was right on the mark with this post. The problem is not them discussing the issue away from the blog but to their best to slander the blog with not very appreciative comments. If they don't agree they either should say why, and they don't, or then shut up. They can't shut up because they have an agenda and because they can't contradict the facts Textusa is putting out the resort to veiled insult. Textusa has opened my mind to the complexities of the case. I haven't read anything here that doesn't make sense and some things started to finally make sense after I came here!

Textusa, I share your point of view. Over the time became quite clear for me the involvement ( the roll) of Murat. There is no other conclusion.He and his girlfriend, probably shared the same adult activities at the OC. After all he travelled from Uk on the week the T9 were at the OC, probably knowing and being invited for the party. I remember early news saying that he use to go out and in from the OC quite often ( didn't need a special permission or be a guest to circulate). The husband of his girlfriend( quite weird to say that) was incharged of the swimming pool. Resorts offering swing activities are very tight with workers they contracted. Must be people, they feel confident, they will not open their mouth and ruin the business. That guy for any reason tolerate the affair between his wife and Murat and went along with them.For me those 3 were the smollest pierrots used by both groups, T9 and BHs, to deal with the real events related with Maddie body due to 2 simple hypothesis: were swingers like the guests and had the perfect location to hide Maddie on the early hours.

Specifically about Mr Bennett's case, it wasn't a libel hearing as such but breach of undertakings. The complainants said the things being said were defamatory and breached the undertakings, as I understand it.

It seems there may be negotiations about the costs. Once the costs have been assessed, if CR so desire he has to pay their bill.

"And to any injunction lawyers reading this with a beady eye in the hope of conning more cash out of their clients: I wish you luck, because I haven't broken the law and you know it.

Some of the people on the list have. The fact we are not allowed to know it, because they've got sucked into a flawed court system where the wealthy pay for their peccadilloes to be hidden, is an outrage."

CR had 6+ people and hundreds of hours billed for trawling JH blog for all post and comments by TB so their costs are really high. The judge looks at how reasonable the costs are and reading his final judgement it looks a though he is saying CR were forced to do so much work because TB kept on breaching his undertakings. If Judge Tugendhat can’t decide he passes it on to a costs judge.

Carter-Ruck's costs?! But...didn't "foot-in-mouth" Kate write in her "truthful" book that CR are working pro bono...? If so, they are not charging lawyers fees, no way the costs can be what they claim to be!

I wonder if they ever look in their mirrors and say" what have we actually achieved by stopping Mr Bennett,saying those nasty (BUT TRUE)things about us,when there are thousands of like minded people still saying exactly the same things,how are we going to control them???" one "down" but too many of us left,thanks to people like yourself Textusa.

You witter on and on about only publishing things you have carefully researched, but publish some pure speculation from a reader about Murat and his girlfriend, without a single word of warning that there isn't a scrap of evidence to support it. Typical...

We were waiting for Anon #8 to reply to your comment. As s/he hasn't done up to now, we feel obliged to do it ourselves.

Anon #8 says "I remember early news saying that he use to go out and in from the OC quite often ( didn't need a special permission or be a guest to circulate). The husband of his girlfriend( quite weird to say that) was incharged of the swimming pool."

It's not referred to which pool is Anon #8 is referring to. One one hand it seems to be implicit that it's OC's. However, OC has, as far as I know, 3 pools and not a pool. But unless Anon #8 corrects, it's a fair interpretation that Anon #8 is referring to the OC's pools.

LUIS FILIPE DUARTE ANTONIO (Pj Files, pgs 1186 to 1191) states that:"--- He is married to MICHAELA WALCZUCH since 1995, both having a daughter called Cxxxxxxxx Sxxxxx Walczuch Axxxxxx who is 08 (eight) years of age.""--- Urged, he explains that he is the owner of a small firm of maintenance of swimming pools for 08 (eight) years, having only a part-time employee, providing services in an area of Barlavento Algarve from Salema up to Portimao.--- That the swimming pools he services are owned by individuals and condominiums, providing assistance in terms of cleaning and making minor repairs."

So from Mr Antonio's words it can't be inferred that he was in charge the OC's pools' maintenance, although he wasn't asked to respond about such detail, so it's equally abusive, until proved otherwise, to say he wasn't.

As you might imagine I have better things to do than to memorize each and every detail from the PJ Files. We count on our readers to correct us. You say "You witter on and on about only publishing things you have carefully researched" but have overlooked to say that we also "witter on and on about" having ourselves be corrected when there's reason for that to happen.

Now it's your turn.

You say "but publish pure speculation (...) Typical..." The use of the word "typical" implies that we've repeatedly incurred in publishing "pure speculation".

The BHs back in town.... Very typical. Looks like 10 hit the nerve of somebody. Very relevant, you 19, commented in english a complaint against a post written in portuguese. Why not complaining in portuguese directly to the poster? BTW, 10 has a very sharp eye and that connection is really possible. Probably PJ made that connection as well. For any reason( out of only speculations) Murat was the third suspect. On the other hand what is:- an abduction theory without a single evidence to bake it? - Pure speculation!- the multiple sights of the girl around the world, which every time turn off as spin? - pure speculation! -Hewlett as Maddie abductor without evidences?- Pure speculation.

From Mccann's and BHs side, that case is a pile of speculations which they want us to buy like an irrefutable truth. No surprise, they get nervous every time somebody think out of the box and point out a way that has real reasons to be pursuid by the official police.

I'm 22. Sorry 10. My mistake, 19 is referring to 8 not 10. The rest of my comment, I reinforce. 8( not 10) hit the nerve of somebody. And the comment of 21 just shows how 8 hit the nerves of important pieces on Maddie case.

Thanks Textusa for your words at 20. I'm anon 8. I don't know how many pools the OC had/has but early reports in Portugal presented Mrs W partner as the guy incharged of the pool maintenance at the OC.Many reports were washed out already, but I will see if I can find the article/ interview or book where I read it. It was the fact of him being familiarized to the OC what call the attention of PJ and make him a person of interest to be interrogated and not the fact of being the Partner of MW.Any way, this is not relevant for the case. Only who wants to divert the attention from the main issue, makes this relevant. What is relevant is the over-reaction of 19 and 21 here. Too much for who pretends to be only an outsider reader/ poster like most of us. Speaking of speculation, from BHs and Mccann's what we see all over this 6 years, is nothing less then speculation. A very convennient speculation trying to make the abduction the only scenario when the crime scene and all statements delivered by the insiders and the witnesses, contradicts that speculation. I'm not saying that my opinion is true. It's just my interpretation regarding what the media plus the PJ files delivered to the public. I believe I'm not the only one remembering that and I'm not the only one having that opinion. For some reason, which could not be only the suspicions of Lori Campbel, Murat was made arguido along with Mccann's. People tend to reduce the qualities of PJ to a convennient point were they appear not only incompetent, but also irresponsible. Unfortunatly for that BHs, PJ was very competent and very responsible. If the early reports were speculation, why no any of the 3 complaint regarding the papers? PJ needs to go back to the early points and finnish the investigation.If Murat has nothing to do with case, he has no reason to worries. Then I don't understand why some bloggers have to worry and over react. If Murat is innocent he have to thanks the day he was dragged on that case because due to that he became millionnaire. Just ask how many innocent people will love to be wrongly connected to a crime if that results on earning a Jackpot? BILLIONS....then what is your problem 19 and 21?.Sent from Helena!

Anon 26, since you're nitpicking on this one comment, thanks to you can assume all other comments Textusa has published NOT to be speculation. By the way I've read the Antonio's statement and let me tell you that divorce or no divorce my husband wouldn't be living under the same roof as me while dating another woman. And one that had a house and was living there only with her mom! So I agree with Anon 8's "speculation".

27, saying that my comment is speculation is really abusive. I based my opinion on information coming from the news crossed with information from PJ files. Most available in the internet for everyone to read. Unless you have other source of credible information that could contradict my point of view and can present it to us, you cannot say my opinion is speculation. If you want, is an interpretation ( mine) of what is available. And in 6 years no one of the 3 came forward to complaint against the papers or PJ, or to reopen the case and let the investigation reach the end and show us that having that interpretation is " speculation".As usual, every time somebody touches the wound of Mccann's & BHs, a group of posters run to the keybords to insult the owners of the blogs or just try to discredit valid opinions. It is a fact, that Mr Antonio was interrogated by PJ as a witness along with his wife and her boyfriend. The reason why he was interrogated may be because at certain point PJ connected all the 3 with Maddie affair. Why? I don't know. could not be because of the love triangle involving the 3. That was a private issue which could indicate a certain type of personality but was not mandatory to connect the 3 with a crime. Something else was found by PJ and raised suspicions. And the papers, looking for that link, reported on early days, Murat familiar to the OC and Antonio doing some work related with pool. If I'm speculating feel free to show me the facts you know to support your opinion and leave Textusa out of that. I post here now, but could be in a newspaper or in any other place.Something is clear, Murat failed to clean his face on Maddie affair and even who hired Birch knows up to where they can play their game. There is a war between the BHs and the Mccann's.

Independently of whatever you say, this person is just seeking disruption so any attempt to show him/her your reasons in support of your argumentation is useless and a pure waste of time. S/he’s not interested in any explanation much less is s/he interested to return in kind.

S/he accuses you of speculation and yet from my question “Could you please quote me on where I have claimed "to have researched everything"?” is capable of deducing the following, in an unpublished comment:“I see you are not denying that your ''theories'' are mere invention, and thank you for confirming that you do not research anything. About lime you came clean to your lunatic supporters“

I think this person’s intervention is very adequate for a post about Pythia, so I must be grateful, I guess.

I agree that pj needs to go back to the early statements before Clarence and Co became involved and whitewashed everything, back then it was just the stupid mccanns and their arrogance Gerry blogging everyday but as soon as Clarence and the polished team became involved those blogs were removed! It is back at the beginning where the Mccanns made many mistakes that is why they persecute Sr Amaral because he is very close to the truth he was there from the beginning and so they try to discredit and ruin him. Their laughing when they left the Church just after Maddie's birthday and Gerry laughing in his apartment not being aware that he was being filmed, now they are careful they are in control of what photographs and stories are printed about them, they have terribly expensive lawyers that cost thousands of pounds and are expected to deliver so once CR became involved ...forget it. But before CR and Mitchell is where the truth lies and the Mccanns with their lies will be found out, for example Gerry lying about the wallet incident what was that really all about, it was before Clarence and CR were in control. His blogs, OC records will find them out, their very odd jogging along that beach, and going to church so often when her parents said they were not particularly religious! Attaching themselves to reputable charities in an attempt to make it look as if their 'charity' was a 'charity' when it was nothing of the sort thats the time when they made their mistakes, and these are mistakes that they cannot change. Kate attempted to change facts in her book what Kate gave significance to in her book and we deem not important is important thats why she wrote it.Also they have employed 'keyboard monkeys' that distrupt discussions and attempt to move away from something significant, but these people need to be ignored, they are insignificant and as Textusa would say they present 'clutter', we must focus on the facts and at present there are and only ever have been three suspects Kate Gerry and whatshisname, and thats all there ever was.... the parents!

What I find so good about Textusa is that she has such an international following, I must admit I struggle with some of the Portuguese comments as I don't understand the language but I am enlightened by them because we all seek the truth we all want the same and Textusa is our voice she has united us and together we will find the truth. Well done Textusa you have a cosmospolitan following from many countries xx

Specially dedicated to the BHs who come here to insult and claim that when we use our brains to see what some tried to hide is " speculation".... Now, when we analyse what BHs and Mccann's have delivered to the investigation and to the public, we can see the huge "misorganization" between the 2 groups. Mccann's where not fully aware of the activities of the BHs to cover up what happened and had to deal with the media and the police in a rush, delivering unconsistent explanations for events created by others to help them bake the abduction story. For me, Mrs Fenn was a BH creation which also surprised the Mccann's who were forced to fit her roll into their own fantasy. Without the help of big tuttors like Mitchell, the result was a disaster. same with creche records and the Tapas dinner. Mccann's and Bhs trapped on their own games. All to avoid a proper investigation which could expose the activities inside the OC.

For all those who love this blog.How about you post under a name.That way we can come to recognize each other along the way.On a forum you have a name and it makes it easier.How about it?And even though the option is when posting is only for anon or your blogging name at the end of the post you could put a signature that we could come to know.Just an idea.And once again Textusa, brilliant post.

MW printed brochures for the 2007 holiday season well before May 2007. In this brochure the half board/inclusive meal arrangements were ONLY at the Millenium restaurant.

There is in the brochure, NO alternative with the tapas bar, this is one of the few easily proven facts.

Even Scotland Yard can work this out.

So the simple question remains, why would a group of Doctors pay for meals at the Millenium as part of the package then expect us to believe they paid extra every night to eat at the Tapas, doubling the cost of the holiday. Why would anyone do that? What was the real reason for them being there?

I would have thought the answer was quite obvious. I am surprised you have so little knowledge or understanding of this.

The reason why limited covers were available to Mark Warner was because this was the arrangement they had with the restaurant. It meant that tables were still available for other diners from outside of the Mark Warner resort, which is important for a restaurant operating all year round which wants to be able to provide a service for its regular customers. It was 20 covers per night.

I see that you didn't challenge the person making the claim that the tapas was not included. So you clearly have a completely closed mind.

Sorry to disagree Tex but Anon #42 isn't bringing old clutter. This is the first time I've heard that MW Guests queued up to reserve a place in a "restaurant" that had empty places every single night! And if they had eaten there they would have realized that, wouldn't they? It speaks loads about the intelligence of MW Guests! This is brand new clutter!!

On what page of the MW holiday brochure 2007 does it state meals are either at the Millenium or the Tapas?

Many things have been altered and whitewashed in this case since May3 but the original brochures are still out here,stating the meals are ONLY at the Millenium which brings the whole chain of events into serious question.

"The reason why limited covers were available to Mark Warner was because this was the arrangement they had with the restaurant. It meant that tables were still available for other diners from outside of the Mark Warner resort, which is important for a restaurant operating all year round which wants to be able to provide a service for its regular customers. It was 20 covers per night."

Good try. Who you want to fool with such rubbish? Never ever a restaurant in Algarve allocate spaces for hypothetical clients who could never turn up and prevent real clients to seat. That will be a disastrous business and was never a strategy followed by any restaurant, unless you want us to believe that the Tapas main business was not the food/ drink but other activities, like a good meeting point for couples to socialize with other couples and get more familiarized. Since over the time the suspicions around swing activities inside the OC grow and grow, was the Tapas part of swing business with a kind of quotes allocated to the two main supliers of clients, MW and TC?

By your silence we can all see that nowhere in his book or in any utterance has Mr Amaral given any indication he agrees with your lunatic theories, or that there was any suspicion whatsoever amongst the PJ that the tapas meals never took place.

So kindly explain why you cling to this fiction, despite the fact that you were never there, and did not speak to a single person involved, when none of the PJ, who were there and who did speak to the people involved, agree with you?

We are expected to believe the tapas and Millenium were both included in the MW inclusive package. The food was identical, how if both had separate chefs, separate kitchens and hundreds of metres apart. Now 15 guests for convenience could eat at the tapas per night, the rest would have to trudge up to the Millenium. The McCann gang were 9, leaving 6 other MW inclusive guests to make the 15. Although the food was the same and already paid for at the Millenium, many of the MW guests paid again to eat at the Tapas. Why would anyone do this?

Check the MW guest sheets which categorically confirms this.

When you realise the Tapas dinners were not a regular feature of their activities, many facets will fall into place.

Strenuous efforts were made to locate every holiday maker in PdL who may have had a brochure but it was too late, most were recovered, but NOT ALL.

"What's your explanation for that, Textusa that none of the officers noticed this huge conspiracy"(45)

Who said that? Did you think the officers disclosed to the general public eveything they think?After 6 years the 3 first suspects remain the same for the officers. Not a single new one was find by the officers, no matter the huge effort the Mccann's PR machine have done to brought one. They remain the main suspects, that's why no one of the 3 want the investigation reopened.

53, a little homework did not take so long: Few time ago, Dr. Paulo Sargento, while seating beside Dr. GA on SIC program " Querida Julia", said that we should pay attention to a blogger who becomes a reference on Maddie issue- TEXTUSA.That is the best compliment, the blog could receive. A little homework will had prevented you to appear so ridiculous.

The guests on an inclusive package could choose to dine at the Millenium or the Tapas. Covers at the tapas were limited

Mr Amaral makes no reference anywhere to any suspicion that the tapas dinners did not occur. That idea is a total fiction concocted by textusa and endorsed by some who are unable to think for themselves or who are very easily led.

There is no evidence Murat or his then girlfriend, now wife, nor her former husband, had anything to do with the disappearance of Madeleine. The fact that textusa allows claims of this nature to be published unchallenged indicates that she is not interested in the truth.

Textusa's central theory is not supported by any evidence.

Mr Amaral regards you as a nuisance, textusa. He can do without the support of people who spread lunatic theories; it doesn't help his case.

What her followers do not see is the many posts textusa will not publish as they completely debunk her nonsense. But rest assured, they do not go unseen....

Sorry to be repetitive but I insist. Could you please enlighten us as to what is your opinion about the reasons Mr. Amaral, a person who you seem to know so much about his opinions, was withdrawn from the case?

By the way, we don't have followers. We have readers. We owe loyalty to no one except truth and in turn don't ask for loyalty from anyone.

anon. 58 . I find it implausible that any restaurant would leave any places at a table empty on the chance that diners would appear. A sure way for a business to lose money. Nor do I accept that the OC would alienate clients by allocating a block booking to a group so they could be near to their children left asleep in nearby apartments, preferential treatment night after night,when others paying the same would have to do the walk to the Mill and back. That would guarantee that I would not return for another holiday, if I had seen a group of tourists favoured in that way........so that they could neglect their children ! It is not credible, another part of the fairytale.

Well, I'm relieved about that, and I certainly don't share your points of view, because I consider the last 2 paragraphs of your "Message to newcomers", which I assume summarises your position, to be (to put it politely) unsubstantiated speculation.

Also, you said in #59 "we don't have followers".

Anyway, Amaral clearly considers that his removal from the investigation resulted from his ill-advised reply to a journalist. He states "I realise that I have not only made a blunder, but I have been unfair towards the majority of the British police who have helped us throughout these difficult months. I drive on, certain that I have triggered a diplomatic incident with predictable consequences: as soon as these simple words are made public, I risk not being able to continue to direct the Portimão Department of Criminal Investigation."

Well again the Tapas dinner- a hot point for Mccann's and BHs, and the warriors at service run to their keyboards to divert/ distract/ insult and try to discredit logical inferences from what the investigation made available to the general public. What I find amazing is that recent twist- suddenly they seem to start respecting GA point of view. Is that related with his refuse to accept an agreement with Mccann's? I pull the string and go with my mad inference, regarding that special BHs- they hate GA and Textusa but what causes them a real urticaria is the Mccann's, if they are not condemned alone for what happen to Madeleine, on the grounds of 'negligence only'. Everything is OK with Maddie dead and that involving only the Mccann's and the Tapas 7. The problem starts when we start using our brain to see what 'a huge pile of pressures/people' so desperately tried to hide from public eyes- THE ABSOLUTE CERTAINITY THAT THE TAPAS 9 WERE UNABLE TO EVAPORATE MADELEINE WITHOUT EXTRA HELP. They are trying to create a myth with Mr GA believing that the Tapas dinner happened. He never said if he believe on it or not. He based his book on what was delivered to the investigation and what BHS and Mccann's delivered, was a Tapas dinner with so big wells that even with 15 or 20 BRT, they were not enough to cover them. He can't change the lies they delivered, but he also made the things very clear about the case- the investigation was interrupted at the beginning. Why? because he reached hot points, very dangerous if investigated till the end, but consistent enough to not be dismissed. Then, the way to dilute the troubles was Mr. Brown asking his portuguese colleague to remove the naughty boy. That was after the Huelva trip and when Amaral had almost everything prepared to bring the SMiths to Portugal, who had an important contribution to help PJ understand what happen on the break hours that go from the moment the Tapas 7 where seen at the Paraiso and the alarm. Any other explanation? BHS keep on your mind, the Mccann's were not alone on that and PJ knows it very well. That is what is causing you so much stress.

Ah, Ah, Amaral removed due to his ill-advised reply to a journalist... That was the excuse used by Alipio Ribeiro but was not the real reason. The journalist used to interview GA was very suspicious because worked on the same paper as Socrates girlfriend at the time. The interview was a rattrap settled at the top, exactly to be used like it was.

rumours? you 68, speculating.You saying that Amaral said any other interpretation was rumours? Is that the reason why he criticized the moment they choose to dismiss him, the day of his Birthday? Is because he thinks, other interpretation are rumours?How loughable you become when you pretend to rise your naif flag.

It is strange the whole abduction relies on a "totally reliable witness", Jane Tanner, but when she states in her police statement that ONLY the Millenium was included in the MW package the BH's refuse to believe it.

And when Vitor Santos, senior housing manager, of the OC states in his police statement the food was identical at the Tapas and the Millenium, the BH's refuse to believe it #58.

And when the Daily Telegraph ran an article on the OC on the 21st April 07 (before Madeleine note) Melinda Libby, the reviewer, does not mention the Tapas in the inclusive deal.

''For dinner the guests could choose between two options, the Tapas and the Millenium and although the meals are identical, the clients choose the restaurant according to its proximity to their accommodation.

In this case in concrete, the rational choice for dinner would be the Tapas restaurant as it is 100 metres distance from the apartment, whilst the Millenium is situated 600 metres away.''

....so there's two instances where the tapas, despite your claims, is clearly described as part of the inclusive deal. Your third point is immaterial

The tapas WAS included as part of the inclusive deal. End of story. Bye now.

Luisa Coutinho’s statement on May 8th:“For dinner, customers can choose between two restaurants, the "Tapas" and "Millennium", in the first being an “á la carte” service, and in the second "bufett", the customers choose not only because of food but also for reasons of proximity to their accommodation."

Sandro Silva’s statement, taken the day before, May 7th:“For dinner, customers can choose between two restaurants, the "Tapas" and "Millennium", in the first being an “á la carte” service, and in the second "bufett", the customers choose not only because of food but also for reasons of proximity to their accommodation."

In 2007 a half board holiday package booked through Mark Warner, included breakfast and dinner at the Millenniun restaurant only.

The Pop-up fine dining venue (poolside snack and drinks bar) known as tht Tapas restaurant CLOSED at 7:00 pm at that time of year.

It also closed down in winter.At the height of the season the bar opened until 9:00pm (lighter nights and sunshine).

No three course formal dinners have ever been available at the snack bar. The idea of continually insisting on this chilly and logistically punishing routine, is both prosaic and childish.

A totally primitive idea at best and not to mention the high probability of stomach-churning indigestion if the Tapas dinners had really happened.Pull the other one, and remember this- Madeleine deserved a life too!

The bit you seem to be missing is that they ALL state that the tapas was available to guests on an inclusive package.

Now you can go back and forth on this all you like. Simple truth is that you are wrong. And the only reason you claim that the tapas wasn't available is because you need that to be true for textusa's lunatic theory to work.

Why don't you grow a pair and have an original thought of your own, eh?

The tapas has got Insane’s knickers in a twist! This could be THE new evidence to reopen the case even though it’s such a simple lie. Although I doubt there is any will to reopen the case by some or influence by others. All the tapas staff, chef and waiters, kitchen assistant are the tip of this iceberg as all the other OC/MW staff had to support their lies. Textusa, I think you did a ripple in a pond post a long time ago and this is exactly relevant to tapas as the ripple centre for 3rd starts to include others who are innocent of the original crime. It highlights how people had to stay in line with Mcs as they became involved so added to the weight of team Mc.

Here is the whole passage. She was replying to a question about the alternatives to the tapas

''Well, I think, yeah, I mean, and we actually did have a conversation, it’s one ofthose ‘What ifs’ as well, I can remember on the morning of the, Thursday morning bythe tennis, at the tennis, somebody in our tennis group had tried to book the Tapasand they couldn’t get in because it was already full. And I can remember thinking atthat point, and I just felt, you know, ‘Good’, because they were bloomin’ awkward bybooking it out. And they were sort of saying well it’s a bit ridiculous that theycouldn’t have got in because they’d booked, they’d tried to book in, you know,they’d been there at nine o’clock to book in and they still couldn’t get in. So, we did,at that point, I can remember having this conversation was ‘Oh shall we gosomewhere different’, but it never happened, but. And Kate was, I think Kate wasthere then, I can’t remember who else, but we did actually say ‘Oh shall we, shall wego somewhere different’. And I think almost at that point we had considered it, but Ithink the problem was the kids were so tired after having such full days, I think it wasmore ‘Well it’s worked every other night’. But I know definitely from my point ofview I felt quite bad that we were taking this, you know, this block booking everynight and it was affecting other people using it”.4078 “What were the other options then for eating, was there a good option close by?”Reply “No, it was just the Millennium, well in terms of ones that you wouldn’t have to payextra for, it was the Millennium, which didn’t really start until, I think it was halfseven or something, so, you know, by that stage it was, we could have, we could have

gone there, so I think. And our kids are probably more, I don’t know, (inaudible) ourkids as they are growing up, but we tend to drag our kids with us more, you know,they have never really had a certain bedtime as such, I think”.''

They won't be reopening the case because, unlike you, they are sane, and know that the tapas meals did indeed take place.

You need to seriously consider contacting your local mental health services if you honestly believe what you post.

Textusa - it is about time you stopped your minions selectively quoting in an attempt to deceive. You tried it earlier with your lies about Amaral, now you are permitting others to do the same.

Are you so dim that you don't realise they will be found out, and then be shown up as the deceitful people they are? Remember, there are people out here who have a much better knowledge of the case and the files than you.

About me lying about Mr. Amaral. You, or you multiple persona in this post, asked me if Mr. Amaral has ever endorsed anything written on the blog.

My answer was no, he hasn't.

As far as I know, he hasn't endorsed any blog, but the question referred to ours, so I answered that he didn't. Where is the lie in that?

As far as I can read, the only speculative words about Mr. Amaral were said by you, when you said he found me a nuisance and a distraction.

Honestly I don't believe you. Not because Mr. Amaral may indeed find me a nuisance and a distraction, an opinion he's perfectly entitled to have if he so deems, but because I'm sure, even not knowing the man, that he wouldn't voice such an opinion about a blogger, any blogger, and much less to people like yourself.

About misquotations, or selective quotations, I'll let comment #85 from abbas to speak for itself.

About my knowledge of the files, I'm still waiting for the quote where I've said I know everything.

Assuming you can read, textusa, and that you don't have to have words tapped out for you by a horse, you can clearly see that abbas, like so many of your posters, attempted to deceive by selectively quoting. It has been noted that you refuse to do anything about this, thus demonstrating that this is a blog which relies upon deceit to make it's point.

You have notably refused to explain your comment to which I referred earlier, namely that Mr Amaral ''started to see it'', a claim which you had no right to make. You are not privvy to his thoughts or opinions, and he most certainly does not endorse yours. Trust me on this.

You should know by now, Textusa, that there is so very much more to life than blogging; well, for most people anyway, even if not for you. Never assume that someone is ''merely a blogger'', like yourself. Some of us have lives you cannot even imagine :)

So here's where we are.

You and your minions have persisted with your ridiculous notion that there were no tapas dinners and that the Madeleine case is a massive conspiracy involving Mark Warners, the guests, the staff, local residents and a cast of thousands.

According to you, this is not speculation - you claim to have proven your theory.

So - who have you told? Because clearly, you must have done. How very irresponsible to have solved the case yet informed no-one.

It's this simple. You have either proven your theories, in which case you would have no acceptable reason for not having informed the authorities....

Or......

You haven't contacted the authorities because basically this is just a game for you where you see how many foolish people you can convince

RE Censored comment.You say…….“They won't be reopening the case”Who won’t be reopening the case? The PJ or the Mcs by requesting it? How do you know this? “because, unlike you, they are sane, and know that the tapas meals did indeed take place!.Prove the tapas meals happened! Or is this like a libel trial where the defendant has to prove he didn’t commit libel rather than the claimant has to prove he did?

“You need to seriously consider contacting your local mental health services if you honestly believe what you post”.This sentence is irrelevant. If everyone with a differing opinion was told they had mental health issues there could only be one political party or one religion so we would be living in a dictatorship.

“Textusa - it is about time you stopped your minions selectively quoting in an attempt to deceive. You tried it earlier with your lies about Amaral, now you are permitting others to do the same”.So you think Textusa should stifle opinion? On a blog where readers choose to read who is trying to deceive who?

“Are you so dim that you don't realise they will be found out, and then be shown up as the deceitful people they are? Remember, there are people out here who have a much better knowledge of the case and the files than you”.Found out for what, having an opinion? Found out by whom? What is deceitful about repeating what is in the official police files? Who cares about being found out, that’s the whole point, people who comment surely want their opinions heard?Are YOU one of the people who have ‘much better knowledge of the case files than the rest of us’? If so why? Because you were at OC at the time or are involved in some other way? Only someone with a vested interest would pay so much attention to a bunch of Textusa ‘followers’.

"You have notably refused to explain your comment to which I referred earlier, namely that Mr Amaral ''started to see it'', a claim which you had no right to make. You are not privvy to his thoughts or opinions, and he most certainly does not endorse yours. Trust me on this."

So I have no right to make claims about Mr Amaral's opinion but you may? And rather much more privy than mine!

I say, and maintain that Mr Amaral started to see the hoax for what it was, thus the interview prior to being pulled out. For some reason he was pulled out. He didn't leave out of his free will.

No, you can't claim that Mr Amaral ''started to see it'' because he most certainly didn't, nor has he ever given any indication that he agrees with you. Quite the opposite. You misrepresent his views in order to try to give credence to your lunatic ideas. You also insult him and his officers, by suggesting that none of them were aware of a massive conspiracy happening under their noses. It is strange that you would regard the fact that your ideas are so ridiculous that they are spectacularly easy to refute as something of which to be proud. By disagreeing with you they are not paying you a compliment, textusa, they are highlighting the nonsense which is your basic theory, and all the assorted junk you have attached to it. They see you for what you are - someone who has no scruples about bullying child witnesses and defiling the memory of dead ones in order to cover the yawning gaps in your nonsensical scenario.

As to those who have a better knowledge of the case than you - well, that's just about everyone, textusa. You have to ask who witnesses are, even though their statements are freely available in the files; you ignore the fact that some of your posters are deliberately cropping quotes from statements in order to misrepresent their meanings, and you freely quote from witnesses whilst seemingly impervious to the fact that their evidence directly contradicts your mad theories.

One thing you don't seem to have realised, textusa.

The main reason why you have such a poor grasp of the case is because you are not very clever. You like to think you are - hence the ridiculously long, rambling verbose posts. But the truth is, you are actually a bit thick. The only thing you are good at is manipulating people. Sooner or later, however, they realise they have been manipulated by you, and away they go.

You see, no-one of any real intellect fears dissent, or runs scared from any challenge to their theory. But you do.

And I think we all know why.

So in answer to your questions ''which people? and why do they know more?'' the answers are ''most people'' and ''because they do not have closed minds and because they are not attempting to deceive''

One day, dear, you will have to come to terms with the fact that you are just a sad, insignificant blogger with a long-suffering husband. As far as the Madeleine case goes, you have contributed the sum total of nothing.

I could not write a more befitting post to "close" a post about the blog being labelled with a Pythia's Syndrome.

As we think your comment about covers all mentioned in the post and way too good to see it go to "waste", we, for the very first time, have decided to "lock the comments" on a post, ending with yours.

Well, in reality with this one but do consider this as a kind of "Post-Scriptum" post.

To abbas, sorry for not publishing your latest comment and we sincerely hope you understand. We thank you for informing us that Scotland Yard have at least one copy of the brochure you mention and that it will be up to them to decide whether the brochure is genuine or not, but it does not mention the Tapas as an alternative venue.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Total Pageviews

As of Jan 19 2019 we're waiting for Jules to own the blog.

MESSAGE to NEWCOMERS

This blog believes that concerning the MADDIE McCANN case the following happened:

- Maddie McCanndied in the early evening of May 3rd, 2007, in the Apartment 5A. We believe the death to have been accidental.

- At the time of Maddie's death the Praia da Luz's Ocean Club was hosting a large swinging holiday (which we believe took place in various locations in and around Praia da Luz - from Lagos to Sagres) in which the McCanns and friends were part of among many others.

- After Maddie's death a cover-up of unseen proportions and scope took place not to hide Maddie's death but with the main purpose of hiding the presence of swinging. To achieve that, Maddie's death had to be hidden.

- We don't believe there was any sort of negligence involved in the Maddie affair. We don't believe that T9 dined at Tapas Bar from Sunday to Wednesday. We think that on those nights they left their children with professional nannies - as did other guests - to go dine downtown PdL. On Thursday night they did use Tapas but that was simply part of what was to be "negligence"that was required to allow Maddie to be "abducted."

PJ Files

Anonymity

A MAJOR MINORITY

TRUTH is Self-Sustained

Think for yourself

Luz - THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED

PdL - What a place. Why does anyone holiday there?It's populated by black heroin addicts, people who rob apartments, gypsies who steal scrap and wood, scruffy moustachioed lurers of children, bogus charity collectors, suspicious street musicians, men lurking near phone booths, glasses man lurking in stairwells, blond men suspiciously lurking outside apartments, soothing couples entering apartments without permission, mysterious gangs of cleaners, men taking photographs of children on beaches... And to top it all, you have to queue for a table booking.Anonymous 11Nov 2013 12:22:00

Maybe because you can always enjoy an ice-cream in the rain?And a dip in an icy pool on arrival always attracts a crowd.Textusa 11Nov 2013 12:28:00

I like the Tapas fragile chairs and tables. They wobble nicely when cutting thick grilled steaks spilling the drinks all about! It's fun for the whole family!Anonymous 11Nov 2013 13:08:00

And how about the number of men seen carrying little blond girls in the street in the middle of the night?Anonymous 11Nov 2013 14:04:00

PdL - where families take it in turn to vomit each night, dog packs pursue and bite joggers, guests fall off catamarans, damage tendons playing tennis, have shaving accidents and stagger around apartments bleeding, domestic appliances need repair, shutters jam, baby monitors won't function at restaurants, travel cots can't be assembled.. sounds like THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED.Anonymous 12 Nov 2013 12:37:00

Child Catcher

Algarve - THE REGION OF THE DAMNED

“Algarve – Where Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’s Child Catcher found it ideal to roam the streets with his GYPSY-wagon:“There are children here somewhere. I can smell them. Come along, kiddie-winkies!”Algarve, the REGION OF THE DAMNED.”

Please Reconstruct I:

PJ's Declaration for Reopening Process:

"Madeleine McCann

As is the case with any situation in which a child goes missing, notwithstanding formal dismissal of the inquiry into her disappearance, and just as has always been publicly stated, the Polícia Judiciária never stopped paying close attention to any and all information that might possibly shed light on the whereabouts of the minor Madeleine McCann, the circumstances surrounding her disappearance and the identity of the perpetrator(s).

It was with this goal in mind that in March 2011 the National Director of the Polícia Judiciária entrusted a team of investigators from the North Directorate with the mission of reassessing, as a whole, the vast amount of information gathered during the inquiry, aimed at identifying data for which a more in-depth investigation might be useful and possible.

The reassessment which took place over the last two years and a half suggested new evidence to have surfaced, which, requiring the investigation to proceed, meets the requirements set out by section 279(1) of the Portuguese Code of Criminal Procedure for reopening of the inquiry.

Accordingly, a request for reopening was made to the Public Prosecutor for the jurisdiction of Portimao, and approval granted by the latter. "

The Anne Guedes Transcriptions

Permanent Suggested Reading

Quote

“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” Mark Twain

Revelations

"For the righteous, a revelation is a joyous event, the realization of a divine truth but for the wicked, revelations can be far more terrifying, when dark secrets are exposed and sinners are punished for their trespasses." Quote from the TV Series "Revenge" (T2 - Ep9)

Truth

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.Arthur Schopenhauer

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.Winston Churchill

The Revolution

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.George Orwell

The Revolution Goes Viral

"Once information networks become social, the implications are massive: truth can now travel faster than lies, and all propaganda becomes instantly flammable. Sure, you can try to insert spin, but the instantly networked consciousness of millions of people will set it right: they act like white blood cells against infection so that ultimately the truth, or something close to it, persists much longer than disinformation"The Guardian (04Jan12)

We must build dikes of courage to hold back the flood of fear. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts Winston Churchill

PRECIOUS, SO TRUE, WORDS

“One coincidence, two coincidences – maybe they’re still coincidences. Any more than that and it stops being coincidence.”

Kate McCann

(in MADELEINE, by Kate McCann, published in 2011 by Bantam Press, pg. 328)

Imagine...

"This says it all, Ms Loach hit the nail on the head!

"Ms Loach replied: “Imagine the public believing that you covered up your child’s death and then sought to make money out of it. They feel shame, humiliation and anguish."

Yes, that's exactly what we, the public, believe, because that's exactly what they did! And, their "shame, humiliation and anguish" are because they know we know!"

Comment posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Sep 16, 2013, 8:36:00 AM on "McCann vs Amaral Libel Trial" post referring to Mockumentary maker Emma Loach's testimony on the 1st day of said trial as one of McCann's defense witness.

Legal Disclaimer

This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and of opinions, between WHITE HATS, so is not responsible for the use, misuse or any form of interpretation (mainly misinterpretation) of its content, as although it uses a public medium, as is the internet, it's of PRIVATE nature, very much like any other conversation that takes place in a restaurant, pub or any other public location, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised.

Sound Explanation for Viciousness

Compliments from the Maggots' Lair:

- “…all the others pale into insignificance when compared to textusa.”

- “I think she should be on the streets and off the internet"

Chinagirl):

- “Disgusting piece of slime.”

(Raptor):

- “Yikes ! That's disgusting.”

(preciousramotswe):

- “You are right. It's a shambolic mess of vitriol and obtuseness. But then they always are. The one that some claimed finally 'proved' who was carrying who during the Smith sighting is a masterpiece of deliberately confused arguments in which labrynthine plots are used to cover how empty the central thesis is”

Out of the Blue (or... Black?)

Hey textusa How are you? well I hope,just thought I would tell you that there are videos about you on youtube, claiming you are an internet predator who stole her daughters identity and prowls the forums for young boys, they say you are welsh!! I think its a case of mistaken identity because are you not portuguese and male? Anyway great blog. keep it up.(Anon., Nov 13th, 05:43)

Conversation from the "Lightless Zone"

sabot:

“Wot Round Table?”

bonnybraes1:

“He/she/it invented a barking mad 'theory' about no-one actually having eaten in the Tapas, because he/she/it couldn't grasp the table arrangements.”

So, because textusa doesn't understand stuff like that, all the Tapas group, the staff, everyone, were lying.

OMG - you don't suppose textusa is actually Gonc, do you?”

sansouci:“Could be Bonny.

The 'theories' about the table and the watersports are really so far beyond bizarre, that I get the feeling that 'textusa' could actually be 'pisstaka'.”

BLACK BUT TRUE WORDS

“Because no-one is more vicious in their search for payback that those who realise they have allowed themselves to be taken for a fool” (A "boomerang" comment left by an Anonymous (Insane?) at Sep 22, 2012 2:06:00 PM)

Insane's IMPORTANT Comments

“…How would any of you idiots like it if your name came into the public domain because you were witness to a crime, and some mad bitch set up a site in which she called you a liar, and claimed you were actually involved in the crime you witnessed? Just ponder on that for a moment”

Aug 28, 2011 9:27:00 AM

“…Where is your sense of shame or decency in accusing innocent witnesses of being involved in covering up the death of a child?

I see no shame or decency on here - just an utter indifference to the rights or feelings of others.

I notice no-one had the balls to answer my question about how you would feel if this was done to you - if you were a witness to a crime and some deranged cow on the internet accused you of being involved. You are all a complete disgrace.”

Aug 28, 2011 1:09:00 PM

FOOT IN THE MOUTH DISEASE

Insane (Nov 14, 2012 11:37:00 PM):

Oh look here - amazing what one can find out by means of a couple of emails to Mark Warner.

You are toast, lady. Finished.

I am going to enjoy this more than is actually decent.

Textusa (Nov 15, 2012 8:50:00 AM):

Well it seems that you're quite privy with the Ocean Club aren't you?

Them giving YOU the information about their own mails?

And you threatening us based on information that YOU apparently got from the Ocean Club.

That's really interesting, isn't it?

Insane (Nov 15, 2012 10:47:00 PM):

One thing I really like about Mark Warner is how helpful their staff are. Really go the extra mile for someone needing information. IYKWIM

:)

Textusa (Nov 16, 2012 11:17:00 AM):

Thank you for confirming that Mark Warner Staff are supplying YOU with information pertaining the Maddie Affair.

Insane's Moment of Rare Beauty

“It would be more suspicious if every account tallied. Police expect to find contradictions, don't tell me you did not know this?” (Nov 22, 2012 3:38:00 PM), when providing an opinion on contradictions from various statements in the PJ Files.

“I don't give a rat's arse about the statements which tally too closely - of course some of them tally too closely, there is an in depth analysis of them on my blog, the one you are not invited to.” (Nov 22, 2012 4:08:00 PM), when, exactly 30 minutes later, provides an opposite opinion, in this case about the fact that some of Tapas' Staff's statements tally too closely.

Insane the Entrepeneur?

"I'd love to stay, but I have a report to write, and it won't do itself, will it?" (Nov 29, 2012 8:14:00 PM)Insane the Disruptor, a new profession shown inNew Career Opportunities

Insane's Proposal for a New Legal Disclaimer

Textusa's new disclaimer. Please ignore all previous versions

''This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and opinions between people who have sniffed WAY too many solvents, and the imaginary people who live at the bottom of their garden, and so is not responsible for the enormous fines, possible imprisonment, or lifelong incarceration in a mental hospital which may result from it's content, as although it is on the interclickyweb, it is of a private nature, accompanied only by the voices in their heads, very much like any other conversation which takes place in a psychiatric ward between people rocking backwards and forwards in their seat and eating the wallcoverings, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised in the half hour per day of free association which the inmates are allowed.''Comment NOT published but submitted on Aug 22, 2011 10:17:00 PM

Kate's Round Table

INSANE'S BLOG

We waited so long for the link...

A possible explanation for the wait: "As I have made perfectly clear, you and your sort will never have access to my blog. We are particular about who we invite, and would not include screaming harpies and riff-faff like yourself."unpublished comment from Insane at Nov 23, 2012 10:55:00 AM

Then, a glimmer of hope?“Publishing elsewhere the posts Textusa refuses to publish is also appropriate - and also gives you fools a chance to read what she withholds from you, knowing that you would desert her if you were aware of how much trouble she leads you into.” (Nov 29, 2012 12:40:00 PM)

No, it wasn’t to be so… :“For the last time, you will never be provided with a link for my blog - you are not welcome there and will never be given access”(Nov 29, 2012 1:38:00 PM)