Jesus there's some unreasonably rude people on this site lately. The OP said they had some dots painted on the doors of their building and was
wondering what it was about, then a deluge of rude responses demanding pics and bascily calling the OP a liar over some dots, when you guys know good
and damned well it's a pretty common practice for newspaper delivery or building maintenance or any number of official reasons.
Just a guess, but I'd say it's entirely possible that the OP hasn't replied or posted pictures because they might have realized they were wasting
their time asking you guys.

I just watched a vidoe yesterday, I can't find it in all my wayyy too many facebook links, but it was basically, red dots, taken out and shot in the
head right away, blue dots taken immediatly to imprisenment camps and killed once they get there, and pink dots, after all the chaos and mess is
cleaned up from the first two groups, thses sheep will be taken then for re-education at the camps........the video was an ex politician holding a
ralley talking about it, and also a man from New orleans, talking about the levies been blow they heard the explosions, and somehow he found out about
the stickers too or something..... I am putting a pink sticker on my door, wait until the crap passes, then switching it to a red a few months later
so they think my house is already off their list, lol........ I hope lol.....

The vidoes were rather convincing though, and I know this crew will
beat me for not posting the vid ASAP so I'll keep searching....

ok, this isn't the exact one, but the main one was in this series.... this one is red blue yellow???

Originally posted by mellisamouse
I just watched a vidoe yesterday, I can't find it in all my wayyy too many facebook links, but it was basically, red dots, taken out and shot in the
head right away, blue dots taken immediatly to imprisenment camps and killed once they get there,

Whoever started this obviously has some fear of large organisations and has never actually worked for one. This makes no sense at all. The problem
with scenarios such as these is that people who promote them (or start the rumours) really have a poor grasp of logistics. Whilst a lot of the NWO
worries are scalable or doable at the moment, particularly when it comes to the IT side of things.

However, the real grunt work, such as these 'dot system for rounding people up' schemes have to be done the hard way. This will entail lots of
people, weapons and transportation. This is an incredible resource sponge and, unlike films where the villains live in volcanoes that open up to
reveal giant secret cities, resources aren't infinite.

So, as with all organisations in the real world - and even the Nazi gas chambers and the like came about from 'logistic solutions' with regards to
killing Jews more 'efficiently' - they, whomever they are, will need a way to cut corners on costs and manpower. This is where part of the plan
behind the colour coding scheme doesn't even make sense. Shot in the head right away seems plausible enough but it leaves a lot of dead bodies in
strange places: lots of (once) private homes. Those bodies can't stay there as what's the point in ruling a land that's plague ridden due to 100s
of 1000s of bodies lying around. All these body-infested homes could be torched but this would mean fire management - which is very resource heavy -
and not very efficient, particularly if this is happening across large cities.

Where this conspiracy gets even more clumsy is with the second category. Those that are taken to some kind of internment camp and killed once they get
there. Why? What's the point in this? Yes, it appears to echo the reality of a Nazi death system but it actually doesn't. The Nazis were, in many
ways, trying to keep a lot of their camps a semi-secret which meant removal and rounding up relative minorities and getting rid of them away from the
general populace. It's worth pointing out that much of these people were already separated from the general populace to an extent too: ghettos,
prisons, hospitals and the like. The scenario you're presenting here isn't really thatsimilar. Rather than a relative minority, this colour
dot scheme appears to be part of a plan to get rid of incredibly large amounts of people, not relative minorities as with the Nazis. Why remove them
from the rest of the population? Particularly after large numbers of 'red dot people' have been executed in their own homes to start with. Why
organise a transport system to remove these people only to kill them the minute they reach their destination? Why not kill them in the same way as the
'red dot people'? What's to be gained by killing these people in a much more resource hungry way?

and pink dots, after all the chaos and mess is cleaned up from the first two groups, thses sheep will be taken then for re-education at the
camps........

[edit on 7-10-2009 by mellisamouse]

I'm not entirely sure this makes sense. Smaller numbers are easier to control, true, but given the complete and utter removal of red dots and blue
dots you only have pink dots left. Would it really be necessary to again use a resource hungry transportation and camp system for re-education
purposes? I'm fairly sure that a large percentage of these pink dot survivors would have learned practically all the lessons they'd need teaching at
this point.

Just to clarify, I realise that it's not something you've posited, and it's not aimed at you personally.

There was something like this that happened a while ago with the coloured dots on the post box's in the us.
I think it was found out that it was a sort of system so that any military or private paramilitary could find out wether or not the occupant of the
household was a threat to them or not for example in a state of marshall law.
Green means your safe
Orange means your being watched
and finally, i think red means your to be "deleted"

I am so disappointed by some of the crap-tacular responses by some of the members of ATS in this thread. Some of you have to seriously re-think your
attitude toward what you are doing here.
I'll tell ya what, though. I got a really good idea about who I should listen to and who I should disregard by this thread.
The OP has an issue and, regardless of that fact, most of you have taken the low road and made fun or called "hoax".

You can argue that he hasn't posted pics, but, do you have to? Why not just check back later instead of berating, mocking or complaining? I'm sure
most of you take offence at your own threads being full of asshats making stupid comments, yet, have NO problem doing it in others threads.

Originally posted by twitchy
Jesus there's some unreasonably rude people on this site lately. The OP said they had some dots painted on the doors of their building and was
wondering what it was about, then a deluge of rude responses demanding pics and bascily calling the OP a liar over some dots, when you guys know good
and damned well it's a pretty common practice for newspaper delivery or building maintenance or any number of official reasons.
Just a guess, but I'd say it's entirely possible that the OP hasn't replied or posted pictures because they might have realized they were wasting
their time asking you guys.

I agree in fact I think alot of these threads are being hijacked by people that troll the Godlikeproductions site because the verbage about the BS
flag is the same. I think the mods should start banning these people so ATS can get back to being an intelligent forum with intelligent like minded
people.

OP I do believe you saw these dots but I personallly don't think it's anything ominious. I know our newspaper deliveries do the same thing on
mailboxes for different day deliveries.

I agree with the comments of how rude people on this thread have been. If I was the OP I'd never post any pics. What's the point? So many of you
are clearly just here to bash people.

My feeling is that this is something benign. Maintenance schedule or some other similar process. I mean, if it was something sinister wouldn't it
make more sense to place the dots in a less conspicuous location?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.