If you have opinions about the subject matter of posts on this blog please share them. Do you have a story about how the system affects you at work school or home, or just in general? This is a place to share it.

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Yesterday,
the Obama administration announced its Clean Power Plan, with the goal of
reducing carbon emissions from power plants in the U.S. Through new rules and
regulations, the Obama administration wants to cut emissions over 25% below
2005 levels by the year 2025. However, Congress has not shown the interest in
passing such legislation. And in and of itself, Obama's Clean Power Plan will
only provide a quarter of the emissions cuts necessary to achieve this goal.
Further action is necessary.

A recent study from the World Resources Institute indicates
further regulations will need to be implemented by the next President,
including cuts from refineries, cements and airplanes among other sources,
along with strengthening Obama's policies. The U.S. alone accounts for 17% of
the world's emissions and along with China and Brazil will need to step up its
game. However, the International Energy Agency estimated that we are currently
on pace for a 3 degree temperature increase by the year 2100.

It is clear that both the Democratic and Republican parties
are not taking the issue seriously. A candidate for the Green Party nomination
Jill Stein has weighed in on the issue, saying that the Clean Power Plan does
not go nearly far enough. She comments, "There is a huge cognitive
disconnect in the President's move to establish his climate legacy by trimming
coal pollution while issuing permits for Artic drilling that spell climate
disaster, and quietly facilitating the Enbridge Pipeline that enables the
continuing sales of deadly tar sands oil, described as 'game over' for
the climate. In addition he has massively escalated fracking, expanded offshore
oil drilling, and opened federal lands to plunder for fossil fuels."

Meanwhile, the Green Party is promoting
a Green New Deal to deal with the crisis. Under the plan, Stein is advocating a
goal and a plan to achieve full green energy by 2030, her campaign
said. The plan includes phasing out “polluting and dangerous forms of energy”
and energy production such as biomass, fracking, nuclear power, and waste
incineration.

But is this plan possible on the basis of capitalism. No. The system will
continue to prioritize profits instead of the needs of the human population. So
what is the alternative? The Green Party in the U.S. has moved to the left in
recent years. Many of its members embrace the ideas of democratic socialism and
recognize that ultimately to significantly reduce carbon emissions and global
warming, we need to be able to plan the economy democratically and not rely on
the vicissitudes of the market. As Greens we need to continue to appeal to
working people and youth. People want decisive change on this issue, as last
year's massive demonstration in NYC shows. You can get involved in your local
Green Party chapter and help elect candidates. Beyond this, Rising Tide is
organizing action councils which are promoting direct action and civil
disobedience in advance of the Paris Summit. This represents an excellent
opportunity to send a message to those in power that we will not be silenced,
nor will we back down on this issue.