To recap a few principles, since B-R provides career games, and then per game points, rebounds, assists and minutes, I have gone with an admittedly highly simplistic look on things with:

Rating = points/game + rebounds/game + assists/game

Why use this definition? It's the data I have easily on hand, which while not a good player rating system is a decent wag for these purposes. Then I group players as follows:

Star -- 20+ rating

Solid -- 15 to 19.9

Role Player -- 10 to14.9

Deep Bench -- 5 to 9.9

Complete Bust -- less than 5

DNP -- (never played in the NBA)

Keep in mind the stats are career per game averages so lower than the peak performance years of a player. Moreover, there is also some bias in that using recent years some of the current players may well spike up their career 'standing' with more years under the belt.

Now to try and gauge drafting performance it is not enough to simply look at average stats, rather we need to adjust by the expected stats for the pick # -- so from our chart in part one, the #1 pick averages 16.6 points, 7.8 rebounds, 2.7 assists, etc and we need to compare that to the actual stats of a team picking at #1 to get a sense of the net...did they over or under-achieve for the pick.

Obviously there are a lot of issues with this approach, such as do you reward San Antonio for taking a consensus #1 in Duncan? The answer to me is yes, because we are talking not only about drafting but about hopefully some measure of player development which is the bigger theme in play.

On account of this, one additional point to mention is in the event of draft day trades, the team winding up with a player after the trade is counted as 'drafting' the player. So for example Dallas gets credit for Nowitzki even though the Bucks actually drafted him (but then moved him on the the Mavericks). It may be I missed some of these transitions as well if they were sometime after the draft, in which case I'll post a corrected version later on.

To calculate value I compare a player's career stats to the average stats for his draft pick number. For example, Kobe Bryant averages 25.0 pts per game for his career, but the average for a #13 pick (including Kobe) is just 9.8 pts per game so his team gets credit for +15.2 points per game for his pick and so on.

Draft picks 1989-2008

Pick Performance

vs. Expected Perf.

Team

Picks

Gms

Pts

Reb

Ast

Rtg

Gms

Pts

Reb

Ast

Rtg

Star

Solid

RoleP

DeepB

Bust

DNP

Milwaukee

40

299

7.1

2.9

1.7

11.7

45

1.1

0.2

0.5

1.8

6

8

7

12

3

4

Phoenix

41

226

5.5

2.4

1.0

8.9

30

1.1

0.3

0.2

1.5

6

4

3

10

13

5

L.A. Lakers

36

341

6.0

2.4

1.5

9.8

110

1.0

0.1

0.4

1.5

5

3

7

12

2

7

San Antonio

30

227

5.5

2.0

1.3

8.8

46

1.0

0.0

0.3

1.2

4

2

6

6

3

9

Cleveland

36

302

6.5

2.7

1.6

10.8

50

0.7

0.0

0.4

1.1

5

4

8

8

7

4

Golden State

47

262

7.2

3.3

1.3

11.8

-9

0.6

0.5

-0.1

1.0

9

5

7

16

6

4

Boston

41

263

6.6

2.7

1.4

10.7

9

0.6

0.1

0.1

0.8

6

6

5

14

4

6

Sacramento

43

309

6.4

2.8

1.4

10.6

50

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.7

5

8

9

11

3

7

Memphis

18

207

8.1

3.7

1.5

13.3

-111

0.3

0.5

-0.2

0.7

4

3

4

5

1

1

Utah

38

253

5.0

2.3

1.3

8.6

44

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.4

3

3

7

12

8

5

Miami

36

224

6.5

2.4

1.3

10.1

-38

0.6

-0.3

0.0

0.3

4

5

7

9

7

4

Washington

35

308

6.3

2.9

1.2

10.4

47

0.2

0.1

-0.1

0.2

4

2

13

10

2

4

Charlotte Hornets

20

402

7.4

3.2

1.5

12.1

85

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

5

1

5

5

3

1

Seattle

48

260

5.5

2.4

1.1

9.1

17

0.0

-0.1

0.0

-0.1

5

7

8

8

7

13

Detroit

37

245

5.0

2.3

1.0

8.4

26

-0.1

0.0

0.0

-0.1

3

3

7

9

8

7

Vancouver

14

334

7.9

3.1

1.8

12.7

8

0.1

-0.3

0.1

-0.1

4

0

2

6

0

2

Philadelphia

44

225

5.6

2.6

1.0

9.2

-9

0.0

0.0

-0.2

-0.1

5

6

8

9

6

10

Indiana

33

315

5.3

2.7

0.9

8.8

71

-0.2

0.3

-0.3

-0.2

2

4

9

7

3

8

Chicago

51

239

6.0

2.7

1.5

10.2

-33

-0.3

-0.1

0.1

-0.3

7

5

8

17

7

7

Orlando

41

243

6.2

3.1

1.1

10.4

-37

-0.2

0.2

-0.2

-0.3

6

4

5

14

8

4

Dallas

45

236

5.2

2.4

1.1

8.7

-5

-0.2

-0.1

-0.1

-0.3

5

2

9

13

5

11

Houston

45

204

4.7

2.1

0.9

7.7

-9

-0.2

-0.1

-0.1

-0.4

5

2

6

11

8

13

New Orleans Hornets

11

129

5.8

2.4

1.4

9.5

-160

-0.4

-0.5

0.2

-0.6

2

1

1

2

3

2

New Jersey

35

255

6.2

3.1

1.3

10.6

-34

-0.6

0.1

-0.2

-0.6

7

3

5

9

7

4

Portland

40

218

5.7

2.4

1.1

9.2

-47

-0.3

-0.3

-0.1

-0.7

5

4

8

8

8

7

Charlotte Bobcats

10

112

7.7

3.4

1.9

13.0

-243

-0.8

-0.1

0.1

-0.8

2

2

1

3

2

0

Minnesota

40

277

6.0

2.6

1.4

10.0

4

-0.7

-0.2

0.0

-0.8

6

3

9

7

7

8

Toronto

24

244

6.8

2.8

1.2

10.8

-69

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-1.1

5

3

0

7

3

6

Denver

42

305

5.9

2.7

1.2

9.9

20

-0.8

-0.1

-0.2

-1.2

6

8

6

9

5

8

L.A. Clippers

44

268

6.0

2.9

1.2

10.1

-27

-1.0

-0.1

-0.3

-1.4

2

14

7

10

4

7

Atlanta

44

176

4.8

2.3

1.1

8.2

-76

-1.0

-0.3

-0.1

-1.5

3

3

8

18

6

6

New York

32

197

4.6

2.2

0.9

7.7

-55

-0.9

-0.3

-0.3

-1.5

0

4

8

9

5

6

I was surpised by how this look came out...Milwaukee as the best drafting team of the past twenty years? In looking over the actual picks though it makes more sense: six "stars" taken -- Glenn Robinson, #1 in '94 and a 29 rating... Ray Allen at #5 in '96, also 29 rating... Redd at #43(!) who has a 27 rating... Vin Baker at #8 in '93 who had a 24 rating (yes he had good years before the problems)... Bogut #1 in '05 and a 23 rating... T.J. Ford at #8 in '03 with a 22 rating. Now Bogut is actually an under-achiever to this point (especially since they could have had Paul, etc) but the Bucks also have scored with lots of other second round picks besides Redd like Sessions, Alston, Phills, Snow, Flip Murray, Bogans...all of whom way surpassed expectations for their lowly pick number.

The Lakers secured Kobe (#13) by trade, but also had stars in Van Exel (#37), Divac (#26), Eddie Jones (#10), and Marc Gasol (#48 but later traded of course...), as well as a slew of solid players like Elden Campbell (#27), Bynum (#10 and climbing in the career averages), and Fisher (#24).

The Spurs have Duncan (#1) as well as Parker (#28) and Ginobili (#57) as the foundation to their multi-title teams. They also nabbed Scola at #55 who is nearing star territory in the career rating, Barbosa at #28, Salmons #26, Udrih #28...

Cleveland is a much more mixed record. A huge lift up for LeBron (no brainer), but they did also tab Boozer at #34, Andre Miller at #8, Ilgauskas at #20, Brandon at #11 for their other stars. Some top ten misses though in Mihm (#7), Wagner #6), Ferry (#2), and Diop (#8).

And for the bottom of the table New York Knicks? Not a single star among the thirty-two picks made, with David Lee at 19.9 rating pushing the envelope to perhaps become the first one soon. Nene was another good pick for them, taken at #7, but their second round picks with the exception of Ariza have been poor performers, and few players who made much noise whatsoever in the NBA.

Then there's the Clippers of the Korolev (#12), Randy Woods (#16), Kimble (#8), Ely (#12), Dooling (#10), Livingston (#4), Olowokandi (#1) horror show. Elgin may want to rethink his discrimination lawsuit, seems like there was some just cause perhaps at work here. The Clippers had 11 top ten picks in the twenty years, and only one of these top ten guys (Odom taken at #4) became a star. Now of course, you could argue and I might that the bigger issue isn't the drafting but the player development once the player gets to the team...more on this later!

Now due to the recency bias (players drafted this year for example have just over half a season as their 'career' stats and will likely improve in some cases considerably on them with a few more years) we must give some excuses for the new to the party teams like the 'New Orleans' Hornets and the Charlotte Bobcats, but you can get a reasonable sense of the distribution of stars/solids/roleplayers/deep bench/busts and DNP's through the years.

I will be formatting a seperate page for the team by team looks so you can see all the hits and misses of your favorite franchise.