DNA evidence of ET?

I wish to applaud you for having the determination to follow this through from our conversations from
this thread to actuality - not many people would have the gumption to stand by their
convictions. I was away over the holiday season and didn't have time to check here as thoroughly as I may have wished to. I am happy that you went
ahead and got your DNA testing done and came back to post the findings.

I am sorry that the results so conclusively categorise you as human. And I mean that; I'm sorry.

As I see it at this junction you have 2 options.

1) Get a more extensive DNA test done which will cost a lot more money and will still have you as human, just with a more detailed view of your
humanity and more results for you to look into.

2) Talk to someone that will listen to your story and let them hear what you have to say. There are some fantastic psychiatrists and neurologists out
there that would love to hear your fascinating concepts and help you with your unique desire to know the truth.

Knowing the truth is very apparent in your drive, seeking wisdom and sharing what you find helps humanity.

Read up on books by people like Oliver Sacks and see that you could benefit everyone by freeing
yourself and enlightening others. Talk to a properly medically trained psychiatrist and tell them everything. The Crowley stuff, the shamanistic
studies, your animal, your beliefs of having alien heritage and your determination to get to the truth.

You will be treated with the utmost respect and will feel so good afterwards for doing so. Getting it all out there to someone about your thoughts
will take a huge weight off of your shoulders and place a happy beat in your heart.

I do hope you will at least try an option I presented. I have a feeling that you will too.

You're a wily, determined SOB that will stop at nothing to get to the truth.

I hypothesise that he used DNA Consultants, Phoenix to get the Autosomal DNA testing done. They usually
send out a swab kit, you get some saliva and send it back. Due to it's close proximity (as well as decent Police database of records) this would be
the most likely choice.

It will have cost 250 USD (plus additional extras) and takes about 3-4 weeks to complete.

He was pretty much doing this as that last thread fizzled out.

That's why my hats off to him. Puts his money where his mouth is - not like a regular hoaxer or malingerer. He might be cool enough to see this
through to it's final conclusion in front of a recognised psychiatric doctor and finally get the answers he seeks.

Those of you who have read my previous posts should know that I claim to be an ET. You should also know that I calim to have evidence. Though until
now it has been rather thin. Bible-Code evidence isn't really much, but, it is much more than anyone else has presented

Shouldn't you be keeping this under your hat?
Isn't it illegal to be an alien? Seems the border patrol would've caught up to you by now.

Fisher-price-my-first-DNA-scanning for the very BEST in proving you are an alien!

Boo.

Boo ?!!?

You, sir, I don't understand!

What "flawed website"?

Yes, I paid for an Autosomal DNA panel. Though it wasn't from the Arizona lab, it was a lab in New Mexico. And, ya know ... after all my research
into this test, I've found that the numbers for the second chromosome are kind of low. Ya see, the difference between Humans and other primates, like
Chimps, is the second chromosome. Other primates have two chromosomes at that location, that seemed to be "fused" in Humans. Other primates have low
repeat values (like I do), while Humans have larger values, though it appears that even my low value is within range for Humans.

It is also curious that, while I'm supposed to be decended from Stewart's and Harris's, there is nary a trace of European population linkage in the
analysis I have. Then there is the Indian population links, I could live with that, but, its not supposed to be there. There is also African and South
American, but they appear to be trace, and probably a false ID.

Anyway, I fail to see how you could be so negative about these results, or the fact that I spent MY money to get them. I may not have proven anything,
but I do know a bit more about my personal biology. How much do you know about yours?

Course, on the other hand, if you want to debunk these test results, please do ... it may go farther to proving I'm ET than the test did

What about this answer, again with regard to another ATS member’s questions about your DNA (emphasis added):

While I'm sure that any DNA tests done on me will shou that I'm not Human, I don't feel that it would prove that I'm an
"off-worlder".

And here:

I said that my DNA would show that I'm not Human, but wouldn't be proof that I'm from "off-world" Your science does not know
anything about "off-world" DNA...it does know about non-human DNA.

But, the tests prove that you are very, very Human.

This is where I disagree. Truw enough, the test seems to indicate that I'm Human, however, from the results on the second chromosome, it could also
indicate that I'm some other "primate". My opinion (and the only one that counts at this personal level) is the test is inconclusive. it is a bit
too anomalous at this point.

It would have been nice if the results said I have no "Human DNA", but as I said, I didn't expect it. Just from the fact that I appear Human,
should suggest that there are some simularities between my species and Humans, and, since I'm not a Biologist, I don't know what they may be. There
are some Biologists that say that life in the Universe may have been started by the amino acids that are carried by asteroids (rocks) and comets. If
this is the case, then it is logical that many species may be more closely "related" than any of us suspect (though I'm not sure I like that ...).
In any case, there are things we don't know, and it only by searching for the answers that we shall learn.

I remain confidant that ultimately I will be shown to be not Human, though the idea of off-world origins will remain just ideas and unproven.

I'm going to have even more laughs when I get the results of my DNA back

I'm sure you'll have a heck of an adventure and find out tons of amazing facts about how DNA works, how mixed heritage is actually healthy and
encouraging for a species and why the European markers didn't show up in your COPIS results.

I'm also a descendant from the Stewart clan, along with other clans, so in some far off fashion I suppose we are related. I wear Harris tweed in
colder climates but I think that's pushing the boat of association out a little too far

I wish you the best of luck in obtaining the results you seek - just remember that critical thinking minds adapt to the evidence presented in order to
get to the truth so don't rule out that other option altogether.

However this pans out I hope you continue to share your results and let us all experience this unique outlook together.

Congratulations on seeing this through, I hope you follow it's full course and are willing to accept the final results.

The only flaw I could see was using Omnipop, and stating that the DNA test had discrepancies because of the use of Omnipop, Omnipop is an 3rd party
application which requires many modules and proper tables, your genetic make up would require you to run several tables in order to give a remotely
accurate bio-geographical heritage, of course you did not give us the tables used to come up with your result, so could only guess that would be one
possibility for the discrepancy, especially if the only tables used were the default. Of course as a software engineer, I would also think you are
aware of this, so just threw that out in case it may have been overlooked due to excitement.

So far it does appear that you are of Human descent, good luck on your search for your truth, and keep us posted.

Originally posted by draknoir2
This thread makes me sad. Seriously. It's proof positive that this guy is sincere in his beliefs and genuinely puzzled by the test results.

And it also makes me angry. Angry that certain people feed into his misguided beliefs when they should be advising him to seek professional counsel
[as some here have done].

Actually, I'm not puzzled by the results. Though I would presume that you have either not seen those results, or, do not understand them.

You assume I have not sought "professional" help, and you assume wrong. It is "professional help" that started all of this, back in the 70's.
I'm not going to give details, its personal and generally "noneya". I still see a doctor on a regular basis, he is provided by the government and
is fully aware of my species.

It's fun to give it to those who pretend for attention or financial gain... this is not such a case, IMO.
[edit on 26-5-2010 by draknoir2]

Indeed, I seek no attention, though the financial gain would be nice, but, I don't seek it, and don't see it happening.

So what you are now saying is because you cannot prove it, it is above me?

Nice. Perfect example of not delivering.

No actually, I figured that one so young as you probably hasn't advanced far enough in mathematics to understand Bayesian Inference. It is a bit
"headdy" for me and I have two advanced degrees in engineering.

Rest assured I will be watching your posts. And if you don't deliver on your statement of more proof by mid 2011, I am going to call you out on it.
Until then I will continue to call you out on pretty much everything else. That's called denying ignorance. If for nothing else, I learn more about
your claims.

Sounds like a threat of "cyber stalking" to me.

If you can't answer the questions, you've given up and embraced ignorance. There's simply no other way to put it.

No constant? No science.

Surely a 60 million year old civilization can't lose a debate to a young adult?

My questions still stand. For the simple fact is you have violated basic scientific procedure for ignoring a constant.

[edit on 10-8-2010 by Gorman91]

Again, you know nothing of which you attempt to speak. Just like your psudo-science, your psudo-philosophy has no substance.

So, just so ya know; 1) You haven't won a debate, you have lost way more than you can know. I already told you, that anything that advances truth is
a win. You haven't advanced truth! You are restricting truth, the greatest "sin" any intelligent creature can do.

2) You think yourself proud, yet you have lost to a toddler. I may be 63 to you, but in my society I'm only 18 months. Congratulations, you've
bested a baby. (take heart, its only in your mind).

Thought this thread had an agenda to harm and was targetting you. I spoke up. The part about the dna evidence and its relation to phonecian and the
vedas was added as well by me. Simple things like the veda and the obvious et history are often overlooked.

Thought this thread had an agenda to harm and was targetting you. I spoke up. The part about the dna evidence and its relation to phonecian and the
vedas was added as well by me. Simple things like the veda and the obvious et history are often overlooked.

[edit on 11-8-2010 by Unity_99]

Isn't it just. I read all of the Vedas back in the 70's. Opened a lot of things, not just my eyes.

That is an abuse of Mathematics. Because you still do not have a constant to observe from. No constant, no science. You need alien dna to observe from
and prove you are a 99.99% match. The only thing you can prove is that you have unique DNA. That you're DNA does not match 99.99% of other humans.
Nothing more, nothing less. FYI, that's the case for every human being.

FYI, I spoke with the mods. They said I did win and that your evidence is falsified and under review.

So yea, don't bother lying. You've already been caught red handed.

I shall repeat the questions.

Why does the constant show numbers like yours? Why is the FST locked at numbers bellow that Europe has? How can you use math that says you are 99.99%
sure to be alien if we have no aliens to compare to and the statistical probability of compatibility is basically zero?

Like I said. "pure blood" is just another way of saying inbred. Inbreds have plenty of mutations. Some theorize most skin pigments humans have was
through inbreeding in new environments they were not ready for. If this alien is an inbred, it explains more than just his dna. Which, for all
accords, is perfectly human.

His dna is highly suspicious and basically give a strong clue. We're all ets here, but basic lines matching to the more ancient ones are strong
indicators. In his case there is an anomaly going to phonecian. He is still on a search for this. Humans basically come from downgraded et forms.
Life and all forms of it are a constant throughout the universe. Every software program that could have been tried, has been, and everything we're
doing here is the past. As I was told, "you must realise these are all past events" (as close as I can remember the words).

For such masterfully intelligent aliens, they sure work slowly and forgot to add a bunch of parts in between the hundreds of thousands of years of
engineering us.

Or, you know, we just evolved. Because that makes a lot more sense that silly aliens forgetting parts.

As I told you. I used the same program he did. I entered a normal man's code. Got the same results as him.

And not to mention there are some features locked out to get accurate readings for Europe.

And not to mention that is crude idea that we are the best species is horribly wrong.

Do you realize that the most fit species for an environment does not evolve intelligence?

Limitations creates intelligence. The more limited you are, the more intelligent you have to be. Humans are limited enough to need to make tools, but
not limited because they can freely live without tools.

IE, aliens who advance faster than us have to be more limited. Think giant slugs, not grays.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.