Judge Hobgood's order indicated that probable cause for removing Cline existed for, among others, the following items from Sutton's affidavit:

Will bring news when available on whether WRAL will stream the Feb. 13 hearing.]

The dysfunctional world of the Durham DA's office continues. A hearing on her case will take place on Feb. 13, assuming she does not resign first. Given Cline's delusional approach to affairs over the past several months, I'm not counting on an early resignation.

WRAL has posted Franklin County Judge Robert Hobgood's order; based on his preliminary findings, Cline's chances in the Feb. 13 hearing do not appear good.

Hobgood starts with a summary of the Allen case: he notes that evidence existed for Cline to bring the case to trial, but also finds that Judge Hudson's dismissal of the case (because the state hadn't turned over evidence) was correct. Hobgood reports that it was "apparent" that Cline found this decision "extremely frustrating," and that thereafter, "signals began to appear that Tracey E. Cline was losing her ability to exercise professional restraint and civility toward Judge Hudson."

Hobgood dismissed a couple of elements of Kerry Sutton's affidavit, but found probable cause for 14 paragraphs in her affidavit, and suspended Cline (with pay) until the hearing is held.

[Update, 10.36pm: Ray Gronberg of the H-Sreports that as of Friday evening, it was unclear who would serve as acting DA until a final resolution of Cline's case occurs.]

KC, Lot's of rock groups have one big record.Norm Cash had one monster season for the Tigers. Even James Watson never published after the double helix paper . (Though ,of course Crick was different.) But this DA's office is able to repeatedly amaze Corwin

NC's retiring governor, One and Done Bev Perdue, will be appointing an interim Durham DA and a permanent DA after Cline is deservedly booted next month.

Note that this is yet another example of how Durham cannot police itself or manage its own affairs. One wonders how this latest episode plays into the outstanding lawsuit where this very point has been made in the filing-- in addition to damages, the plaintiffs seek to have a third party manage the Durham's criminal justice system. Durham keeps making the point for them.

I haven't been posting for awhile but do read your good work(s). This DA is a disgrace.I wonder what is wrong with the water in Durham. People seem to believe they are in charge of the world when they get a small position of authority. They don't understand there is always someone higher in the pecking order. Also, the blogs shed light on many matters that would not otherwise be known.

Would Durham DA Cline be able to run again for this job the next time an election is held? Maybe she could go to Duke Law school for some remedial training in spelling. , writing legal briefs, and legal ethics while she is on sabbatical.

People seem to believe they are in charge of the world when they get a small position of authority.

John W. Campbell (known as the “father of modern science fiction” due to his cultivation of a generation of famous writers as a result of his long-time editorship at Astounding/Analog) said in one of his editorials that it isn't true that “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” as Lord Acton alleged — because folk can often wield power without being corrupted, if they are subject to having to answer for the usage of their power.

Rather, what corrupts is immunity from the consequences of one's acts. Thus, a minor official or bureaucrat might become quite corrupt, if relatively free from proper supervision and controls.

KC,Yesterday Obama fired a warning salvo accross the bow of all institutions of higher learning, to wit, the government will monitor the tuition and, I suspect the percentage of minorities on the faculty and in positions of prestige, i.e., deans,student organizers, even Trustees, etc. Duke may end up being ahead of its time.Big Al

Obama's SOTU tuition/federal aid remarks reflected a line of critique (that federal aid to tuition does nothing more than raise tuition costs, and thus subsidize colleges) that's come almost exclusively from the right side of the political spectrum, especially from libertarians. I've never before (at least before your comment) seen this line of critique linked with federal demands for quota hires, which libertarians obviously oppose and which Obama (whatever he might personally believe) would never support because to do so would be politically suicidal.

I also am unable to discern any connection between Obama's SOTU proposal (which has, I should note, no chance of adoption) & the past behavior of the Duke administration. Indeed, its my sense that college & university administrations almost universally oppose the proposal outlined by Obama. I don't know what the Duke BOT position is, but I'd be shocked if they supported it.

FWIW, I was on the other side of a few cases criminal cases in Durham where Tracey was involved. From what I remember, she was professional and did the right thing as she saw it. Two things are clear however:1. Tracey has lost it - it looks like an organic issue to me - a small stroke or chemical exposure. Mitch leaving that office should have been a red flag to everyone that something was seriously wrong.

2. The culture of the Durham DA's office, as shown time and time again, is to win cases at all costs. Nifong and Cline built their careers in that office, and they both treat criminal cases as personal wars.

Prosecutors need to be way above the fray, considering things like use of resources and benefit to society. Many of the DAs in Durham (and sadly around the country) cannot separate themselves from their work and have no role models for how to make decisions about dismissals. A dismissal is not a personal failure for a DA, it's often a good rational decision.

Lois - Hobsbawn is a communist, but also a serious historian. Not like the modern pc leftists who dominate academia, people like the American Historical Association: http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2010/12/ahas-shame.html

I was wrong - Hobsbawm hasn't been a communist for decades. He's still some kind of leftist though: http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/newsnight-on-responsible-capitalism-prof-eric-hobsbawm-19jan.html#entry15031525

Blog Awards

About Me

I am from Higgins Beach, in Scarborough, Maine, six miles south of Portland. After spending five years as track announcer at Scarborough Downs, I left to study fulltime in graduate school, where my advisor was Akira Iriye. I have a B.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard, and an M.A. from the University of Chicago. At Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center, I teach classes in 20th century US political, constitutional, and diplomatic history; in 2007-8, I was Fulbright Distinguished Chair for the Humanities at Tel Aviv University.

Book

Comments Policy

(1) Comments are moderated, but with the lightest of touches, to exclude only off-topic comments or obviously racist or similar remarks.

(2) My clearing a comment implies neither that I agree nor that I disagree with the comment. My opinion is expressed in my words and my words only. Since this blog has more than 1500 posts, and since I at least occasionally comment myself, the blog provides more than enough material for readers to discern my opinions.

(3) If a reader finds an offensive comment, I urge the reader to e-mail me; if the comment is offensive, I will gladly delete it.

(4) Commenters who either misrepresent their identity or who engage in obvious troll behavior will not have their comments cleared. Troll-like behavior includes, but is not limited to: repeatedly linking to off-topic sites; repeatedly asking questions that already have been answered; offering unsubstantiated remarks whose sole purpose appears to be inflaming other commenters.

"From the Scottsboro Boys to Clarence Gideon, some of the most memorable legal narratives have been tales of the wrongly accused. Now “Until Proven Innocent,” a new book about the false allegations of rape against three Duke lacrosse players, can join these galvanizing cautionary tales . . , Taylor and Johnson have made a gripping contribution to the literature of the wrongly accused. They remind us of the importance of constitutional checks on prosecutorial abuse. And they emphasize the lesson that Duke callously advised its own students to ignore: if you’re unjustly suspected of any crime, immediately call the best lawyer you can afford."--Jeffrey Rosen, New York Times Book Review