That’s what concerns me, too. But here’s another layer - Cass Sunstein and the other regulatory ministers are in place. Do you think that they would decide that the cost-benefit ratio of canceling elections would not be worth it to them (never mind the inherent evilness of it), and that they would move their takeover efforts to the non-elective side of the balance sheet?

You know - it all looks normal from the voters’ point of view, but they continue to shove stuff through off the elective books?