The United Nations (UN) for some people conjure up images of a
benevolent
organization intended for the preservation of human life wherever
conflict occurs, and of encouraging international cooperation and
peace.

Far from this peaceful
image, however, is their little-publicized plan to depopulate 95% of
the world by 2030. Or as they have called it,
Agenda 21.

United Nations
plot to depopulate 95% of the world by 2030

Agenda 21 was United
Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for
Sustainable Development and was apparently developed as a means of
restructuring the world population to lessen environmental impact
and achieve an improved quality of life.

One of the main ways of
achieving this, however, is through encouraged and direct
depopulation.

As the UN put it:

"comprehensive plan
of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by
organizations of the United Nations system, government, and
major groups, in every area in which humans have impact on the
environment."

Although the language
used in the original 70-page report (National
Implementation of Agenda 21 - A Summary) that the UN published on Agenda
21 is vague and open to interpretation, as well as plausible
deniability, the intentions in certain sections are clear:

Depopulation to lessen
environmental impact and stop overpopulation leading to instability.

While this sounds like a
positive thing in some aspects, mere policy changes at governmental
level alone cannot create an environment where big enough changes
can come about in a short space of time.

To achieve such huge
scale depopulation with a relatively short deadline the actions were
taken would have to be drastic. Either a world war, global epidemic
or some kind of widespread starvation caused by massive crop
failures would be the only likely ways of achieving this.

The idea also raises the
question of,

Which 5% of the
global population would be saved?

Would these be
those strong and hardy enough to survive the conditions
placed on the earth that would kill off the remaining 95%?

Or perhaps the survivors would be chosen selectively from
the elite and wealthy?

Whether such a plan could
ever actually be successful is another matter.

Plans of this size and
scope would require the collusion and agreement of at least every
first world government in the world, not to mention that the amount
of resources and effort that would have to go into keeping something
like this covered up would be astronomical.