Issue: Will the Federal Court set aside a Refugee Board refusal when the Board has not stated clearly why the claimant’s persecution differs from the persecution the Board acknowledges is faced by Roma in the Czech Republic?

Issue: Where the Refugee Board finds a claimant’s history of persecution not credible, but accepts his identity and ethnicity, is the Court still obliged to assess objective country conditions to determine the level of risk of return?

Issue: If there is an area in the country where a refugee claimant can be safe, does the Refugee Board fall into error in failing to address the danger in travelling to and accessing that area from the claimant’s native village?