Look at the photo above. Which is the real Kate Winslet? I cut out the background and in my opinion you can hardly tell the difference, although the pose kind of gives it away. I also looked very closely at the wax version, and wax Kate has more wrinkles and lines than current Kate does.

Comments are Closed

Oh please. The wax figure is what Kate would look like if she actually did get cosmetic work done! Did you see her on Graham Norton last month? Wrinkles galore. Her face is fine. And IMDb doesn’t have her working on anything because maybe she doesn’t work all the time? She has a family you know.

Those wax figures are amazing! Best ones I’ve seen. The wax museums freak me the hell out though. I went to one by myself once, and I was literally looking behind me the whole time bc I would suddenly notice one that I hadn’t noticed just before and they all looked real, except real in some sort of strange horror movie way.

Amazing! Pay rise and a pat on the back to the whoever created that one, they usually look totally guff (bad)!!

Only tourists go to MT’s as it’s stupidly expensive to get in, you see gangs of French and Italian school kids hanging around outside looking fed up (“sacre bleu, how much did we just get ripped off??!!”)

I don’t get how saying that the real version has a more youthful appearance than her wax doppelganger is an insult. Did I misinterpret something? I know her fans are plenty protective of her and can get a bit ‘animated’ when the subject of her face and figure arise, so I’m sure what the story is, here. At any rate, to my mind, Wax Kate trumps Flesh Kate in that it doesn’t talk. Oh, she’s talented, good-looking, seems reasonably intelligent and mercifully doesn’t inflict herself on the public through tawdry overexposure, but still…scraping through a warehouse filled with blocks of parmesan cheese would be far less grating than sitting through one of her interviews. Or, at least it would be for me. Oh, you can’t like everyone and if the counter-argument begins with, ‘Well, at least she isn’t–’ we will have officially arrived at the stalemate portion of the conversation.

Whoa! Even more impressive are those Dame Judi and Helen Mirren statues on the sides. They look very real. Helen’s face is more animated than Kate’s, which looks kinda mannequinish in facial expression.

How old is Kate? She is getting the same weird thing I am getting – one eyebrow still looks botox high even though its natural but the other is falling. The eye on the side that is falling is also looking smaller due to early eyelid droop. I’m in my early 40s. I didn’t think Kate was even 35 at 35 both my brows looked botoxed (sniff).

YES that is a nitpicky only someone with the same issue would catch it thing.

PS: That wax artist is very talented she caught the eyebrow thing even if it’s not as obvious on the figure.

amazing waxworking aside HOW long is kates little finger? look at the side by side. its super long in real life too. And Helens little finger looks long too. Celebitchy please research – do oscar winners have longer than average little fingers? We have a right to know!