Perhaps because they lack any intelligence or morality? Or maybe their intelligence and morallity have been disabled?

I think that 'anti-racists' are really 'anti-Whites' at heart, as has been stated on this forum. It's a war, they hate Whites, and they want to destroy Whites. It's genocide of Whites and destruction of all culture. The hatred they feel for Whites is a strong emotion that drives out any intelligent thinking, and over rides any morals they might have.

When they say that the posters on this board hate, they are being reflective.

Notice the other thread here, "I used to hate you people." Right there is an admission, when you think about it. She didn't say, "I used to hate your racist attitude." And if you read the thread, she wasn't won over by the logic of posters on this forum, but by actual contact with blacks. The seed was planted in her mind, however, so when she was exposed to a black 'community', she realized that the racial realists were right, and the egalitarians were wrong.

The anti's are jews, blacks, latinos, and others that want to steal, kill and destroy Whites, because they cannot make for themselves what Whites have built. And there are a few self loathing whites also. They are all into an emotional, reptillian mindset. Logic, reason, facts, debate; those things won't work on such people.

The problem with your movement is that you always associate white pride and heritage with hatred toward other races.

That is only the media spin. But some of us are really frustrated and do express "hate" to what is happening in this world. We don't hate other races, we just want our own homelands. Can you superior anti's with your objective and compasionate nature give us a homeland?

That idiot Trivial doesn't understand that the biggest bookburner out there is Canada. A socalled "democracy", which persecutes quite harmless people (Paul Fromm etc.). The sh!t that comes out of the anti-whites mouths are quite strriking some times. I don't really care that much if I go to prison (in this climate it is to be expected), but when some dude who is much less extreme is getting tortured because he want's the truth, that is what bothers me!!! (Rudolf Germar, Paul Fromm, Marc Lemire etc.)

Wolf

That makes me wonder if anti-racists support censorship and imprisonment for thought crimes. Many will come here and emphatically state that they're opposed to such, but they're just being politically correct in my opinion. We never hear or see them speaking out, or protesting against such tyranny.

That automatically makes me question their honesty and integrity. If anti-racists are against censorship and imprisonment, are they willing to admit that's exactly what diversity promotes? If so, are they prepared to renounce their beliefs -- the very beliefs that have allowed for the above-mentioned? In other words, are they willing to admit that we're right?

As usual, the more we probe the anti-racist psyche, the more questions that are raised. Anti-racism leaves an awful lot of questions to be answered, and anti-racists can't seem to answer any of them without contradicting themselves.

Are any of you so-called anti-racists going to address the opening post on this thread? Your silence speaks volumes.

Germany is a constitutional, parliamentary democracy with an independent legal system based on the rule of law. That is what the German government claims and what the German "Basic Law" spells out. The Problem is that all governments of the former communist countries used to claim exactly the same thing, and that their constitutions read nicely too, on paper. The truth, as we all know, was different in those countries.So what is the truth about Germany today? The truth is that in Germany

folksingers are threatened with imprisonment for singing peaceful songs;

a professor who writes his disbelief about certain historical events in a footnote, written in Latin(!), in a scholarly anthology(!) was prosecuted and threatened with jail, and the anthology was confiscated and burned;

a judge, writing a well-founded, but highly controversial book on historical topics, saw his book confiscated and burned, his pension cut, and his PhD title withdrawn as a result of this;

a history teacher was sent to jail for uttering historical dissent in a private letter to a high-profile personality;

a professor criticizing internationalism was kicked out of his job, harassed, prosecuted and driven into suicide;

a historical dissenter was sent to prison for more than two years just because he published peaceful, scholarly historical material;

well-founded, heavily footnoted books on political and historical topics, authored by academics with plenty of credentials, were and are being confiscated and burned by court order;

authors, editors, publishers, printers, wholesalers, retailers, importers and exporters, warehouses, and customers buying more than two copies of a certain medium with peaceful, yet issenting views on history or politics can be prosecuted for producing, stocking, importing/exporting, distributing such dissident material;

the authorities hide from their citizens, which media are outlawed, so that one cannot possibly know whether or not one commits a crime when distributing such media;

judges are threatened with prosecution because they did not punish political and historical dissenters harshly enough;

defense lawyers are prosecuted if they try to introduce evidence showing that the dissenting historical views of their clients, for which they are prosecuted, are in fact correct;

internet providers are forced by law to censor the internet by not forwarding dissenting political and historical material to their customers;

the authorities are actually proud of conducting more than 10,000 criminal prosecutions every year(!) against persons for having committed peaceful "thought crimes", or more than 100,000 persecutions of peaceful dissenters in ten years!

You never heard of these things! Here you can find the evidence for it:

Anti-Whites, I submit this to you, so you can start to gain an understanding just how far gone things have become for us. All of the things that you believe we are guilty of, all of the things that you think we promote, all of the evils you think we wish to bring upon others, are in fact solely used against us.

All that had to be done, in regards to claims by Germar Rudolph, or Ernst Zündel or any of the many others just like them, was to prove them wrong. But because in most instances they could not be proved wrong, they were persecuted, silenced and incarcerated.

You Anti-Whites come here knowing nothing about our issues or positions, resort to emotionalism and then when presented with facts, you ignore them. For those of you who aren't white, I don't really blame you, you all have been taught for so long that the evil white racists wanted to hurt or kill you, and you are responding from the position of your own race. Well let me just say outright, that is not true. We want to look out for our interests, and preserve and protect that which we hold dear to ourselves. To those Anti-Whites who are indeed White themselves, please keep an open mind to our arguments, as they are issues that affect you too. Rather then operate on gut-wrenching guilt and hatred(for us), try to see the big picture of things.

I am not going to respond to this, and leave this only as my personal opinion. Something for your consideration.

The problem with your movement is that you always associate white pride and heritage with hatred toward other races.

If that's the only problem, and assuming that you're white, is that your reasoning for not standing united with your race? If so, then with all due respect, you're weak.

You're allowing your views to be dictated by political correctness. That shows me that you care more about what you believe to be popular public opinion, rather than what's best for your race and nation. What does that say about your integrity and priorities?

Let me clarify something. Hatred, pride and heritage are all separate issues. They're not to be confused.

But let's address hatred. Are you saying that we have no justifiable reason to be hateful towards a social experiment that has undermined and continues to threaten our traditional ways of life?

Sure, you can argue that we may hate other races, but that's a two way street. All of this racism, hatred and bigotry that people whine about is symptomatic of a failed social experiment that flies in the face of human nature. Can you at least admit to that? If not, then just what is the justification for anti-racism?

Instead of focusing on the symptoms of the problem, why not focus on the cause of the problem? Or would that be politically incorrect, ie:, hateful, racist and intolerant (anything but the truth of the matter)?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheNewDr.RodneyKing

As a great, oppressed, African American man said back in 1992, CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG!!!

Incidentally, isn't it true that the riots that followed the King verdict were racially motivated by blacks? It seems that blacks care nothing about peace, love, tolerance, sensitivity and white anti-racism. Blacks only care about blacks. How many examples do you need?

All humans on earth are human (Believe it or not). I'm sure you guys wouldn't like to enter a country like North Korea and be beaten up or killed just because you are of a different race. Same goes for everyone else. Sure there may be certain groups of certain races that behave indecently or are racist themselves. But that does not mean that their whole race is no good. There are good AND bad people from every race and each race has both their own good AND bad traits. I'm sure if there was no racism in this world it'd be a much more peaceful place. And when I say racism, i don't mean making a racial joke (like when i ask my chinese friend if he sees in widescreen) Seriously, people who get offended by jokes like that are idiots. I'm talking about treating them with less respect than people of our own race.

The only reason why different races are physically different is because they've adapted to the conditions they live in. And it's not like it's their fault that they aren't white. So it'd be nice if you'd leave them alone.

Well,I have integrity and honour.......just not as you perceive them.I respect almost all people.There are exceptions(criminals,abusers,etc,but I am sure most people think the same).However,I treat with respect all people that I know/meet,even if I don't agree with them.I care about my friends and close persons(especially family),i really try not to harm any person,etc.And,yes,I stand for what I believe in,just that I don't think racism is good.

And no,I don't hate white persons.But I would not treat someone differently because he/she is white either.