Hi folks,
Iím Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 10th of
June 2011. Newcomers should go into the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com.
Help yourself to the free downloads of audios. Thereís hundreds
there. And hopefully youíll learn about the big system, this
superstructure around the world we call the New World Order. All the
organizations, foundations, big bankers, very important people and so on, who
really run the worldís program and plan the future as their parents planned
your parentsí future and going way back into quite some time ago. Itís
been going on for an awful long time, because the World Order is always new as
they get you used to the next part of it and the next part and the next
part. You canít hold on to power unless youíre controlling the
future. Youíd lose it eventually along the way, because somebody else
would come along with some other scheme and away it would go. So you
always make sure that the world follows the plan that you have laid out for
it. And thatís what weíre living through. And itís no conspiracy
theory, because those involved in it often write books about it, and they love
to write memoirs, and they tell you about their great part that they played in
shaping this future for you. So, help yourself. Learn who they all
are, where itís all to go, why the things are happening today the way they
are. Why in this wonderful Utopia theyíre bringing in some people are
more equal than others, and youíll find all of that if you read their memoirs
and listen to the audios I give you, the various books, names along the way,
and hopefully you can make up your own minds as to whatís really happening.

And remember too that youíre the audience that bring me to
you. I donít bring on guests who really advertise under the guise of
informing you. Most hosts make their money that way, and they have
to. A lot of them are married, etc. Some of them are businesses,
but this is not a business. Itís up to you to keep me going, because, as
I say, if I wanted to go the advertising route, I could certainly take it, and
Iíd be kind of laughing. Iíd get some staff in here and put my feet up once
in a while. But Iím doing it the suicidal way, and itís up to you as I
say to keep me going. You can buy the books and discs I have for sale at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and you can, from the US to Canada, you can use a
personal check or an international postal money order. You can send cash
through the post. And you can also use PayPal. Just use the
donation button youíll see on the .com site, and follow it with an email with
name, address and order, and Iíll get it out to you. And across the rest
of the world, youíve got Western Union, Money Gram, and you have PayPal again,
using the donation button. Remember, straight donations too are very,
very welcome, because weíre all feeling the pinch as we go through this very
well controlled hyperinflation.

They wonít
say hyperinflation until maybe next year some time or maybe the end of this
year, but weíll eventually get there because we owe money across the whole
planet, all the First World countries that is, because, you see, the plan is to
now bring up some of the other countries, the favorite countries, and itís
their turn to dominate. Theyíre still owned by the same people though,
mind you, who already dominate us. And we have to go down as we pay for
them coming up through our tax money and massive grants to big businesses, and
international corporations, which will be based in India and Brazil and
elsewhere, just like we did with China. China didnít bring itself up by
the bootstraps, they were funded into existence. The West trained their
engineers, and then the World Trade Organization through treaties and all the
traitors in your own governments, signed the deals, and your factories and
businesses moved over to China. And that was all done, really in the
open, itís just that most folk at the time have no interest in whatís really
happening in the world. Theyíve been trained to look at sports and trivia
and that kind of thing, so they have no real knowledge of whatís going
on.

They didnít
even notice for quite a few years, most of them, that everything was made in
China, until youíd point it out to them. And even then, thereís no
interest, like, how did that happen. Nope, thereís just nothing
there. Just that glazed look, and you know, on they go with their
sports. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks,
weíre back and this is Cutting Through the Matrix. This world is a very
difficult place to understand if you truly believe the media, and youíve had no
background knowledge on the events theyíre even talking about in the media,
because, you understand, itís all perception management. Just like
school, and their little toolkits to teach you a certain thing, they omit maybe
half the story, the other side of the story, and leave you with one side of the
story, knowing youíll come to the desired conclusions, and thatís generally
fixed for life in your mind. Thatís with most major topics, in
fact. Well itís the same as the media. They can completely alter
the perception and the spin on it by omitting half of the other side of the
story, or a lot of the other details which would give you the full
picture. Itís not meant that you have the full picture.

And during
World War II for instance, in fact before World War II, the big boys talked and
wrote about the need for world government. The League of Nations was set
up in the hope of forming that and bringing it in. And World War I they
hoped would bring all the countries to their knees financially and every other
way, and theyíd be devastated, which a lot of them were in Europe in fact, some
of the countries were devastated. And they thought they would bring them
to their knees and theyíd give up, and theyíd all blend in together and bring
in this Marxian World dominated by the big banks on top. And they almost
got their way, but the US didnít, even though they were the ones that were led
in, as the new knight in shining armor, you know, that hadnít been involved in
foreign wars before, like that, across in Europe. And even though Wilson
was picked to be the front man by his British handlers, and he certainly was
handled by Britain through Lord Grey for the Milner Group, that became the
Royal Institute of International Affairs, and through Mandell House, even
though he was the lead man for it, and by the way, Bernays was there too, to do
all the PR work for it as well. A very young man at the time. It
shows you he was taught very early, probably from birth for his particular role
in the world. And eventually the American people themselves didnít want
it. They knew there was something very fishy about giving up
sovereignty.

However
they said theyíd need another war, and H.G. Wells said that. We need
another war. They havenít gotten on their knees yet, and Bingo, they fund
Adolf Hitler and set that up and they funded the Soviet Union too, and they had
their war. And they still didnít quite get what they wanted, because that
generation that did all the fighting werenít quite willing to give up
sovereignty after being told through massive propaganda, go off and fight for
your culture, your freedom, and your way of life. And of course, this
whole idea of internationalism is to destroy your culture and your traditions
and your way of life. So they had to wait a while longer and push it
through the schooling systems step by step, the long-term Fabian
approach. And thatís why the Fabian Society is so important to those that
rule the world.

Anyway,
hereís an article here on the International Monetary Fund, which like all of
these wonderful sounding things to help people has the opposite effect, itís
the opposite purpose. And it says:

IMF Financial Terrorism

In July 1944, the IMF and Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (now the World Bank) were established to
integrate developing nations into the Global North-dominated world economy in
ways other than initially mandated.

Under a new post-war monetary
system, the IMF was created to stabilize exchange rates linked to the dollar
and bridge temporary payment imbalances. The World Bank was to provide credit
to war-torn developing countries. Both bodies, in fact, proved hugely
exploitive, using debt entrapment to transfer public wealth to Western bankers
and other corporate predators.

On a grander scale today, the
scheme destructively obligates indebted nations to take new loans to service
old ones, assuring rising indebtedness and structural adjustment harshness,
including:

- privatization of state
enterprises,

(Alan: Thatís what the IMF does when it comes into your
country.)

- privatization of state
enterprises, many sold for a fraction of their real worth;

-mass
layoffs;

(A: Thatís what they always do in the public sector and
various other places.)

- deregulation;

- deep social spending cuts;

- wage freezes or cuts;

- unrestricted free market access
for western corporations;

- corporate-friendly tax cuts;

- tax increases for working
households;

- crushing trade unionism; and

- harsh repression against
opposition to a system incompatible with social democracy, civil and human
rights.

As a result, bankers and other corporate
predators strip mine countries of their material wealth and resources, shift
them from public to private hands,

(A: Thatís public/private partnerships. Itís all part
of that too.)

crush democratic values, hollow
out nations into backwaters, destroy middle class societies, and turn workers
into serfs if they manage to have any means of employment.

In other words, perpetual debt
bondage substitutes for freedom. A race to the bottom follows. An elite few
benefit at the expense of the many, entrapped nations henceforth forced to pay
homage to their money masters, effectively handing over their sovereignty.

And John
Pilger did a lot of documentaries about this very technique used across parts
of the world, and how the IMF will support dictators, or even put their own
dictator in, and literally halve the wages of the public there or even less,
and have them working like slaves, like they did in Indonesia and elsewhere,
and Malaysia. So, itís just quite something to see. Iíll put this
link up tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the
broadcast.

And you understand, thereís not an area of social life
thatís not dominated by a particular organization or a few organizations, all
working together in this big world governmental system. And in Britain,
itís collectivism theyíre using, a form of collectivism, and they call it
Communitarianism, a term first heard by the public by George Bush Sr. in one of
the speeches he made. And this one is from Britain. It says:

Localism Bill makes further
progress

(A: They like to muddy the waters by giving it
different terms for the same thing. It says:)

The Government has said it is
prepared to consider further changes to its flagship Localism Bill which
contains proposals for major planning reform, including a new tier of land-use
plans at neighbourhood level.

You see,
eventually in your little neighborhood, youíll have your little Soviet system
there, where a leader will be presented to you, not elected, and heíll go off
to the World Bank and borrow money for your area, and you will have to pay off
all the loans, you see, on a low level. And that gets it off the
governmentís back. However, youíre still paying all of the taxes youíre
presently paying to the federal government as well, and to the EU
Parliament. Youíve got these two big ones to pay for now. Now your
third one is for your local level as well and much bigger payments will be
needed because youíll pay too for the corporationsí factories to be built and
stuff like that, or whatever else, whatever kind of business they put in
there. And itís not democratic, because the new system is not meant to be
democratic.

The Club of Rome said that
they favored, of all the systems that they studied, they favored the
collectivism system, and they liked the Russian model really, because everyone
obeyed the federal government. Of course they did, or theyíd kill
you. There was no arguments from the general public. You werenít
allowed to argue, and thatís what youíre under today. Thereís no such
thing as democracy, as you can well see. Itís simply diktats coming down
from the top, and you do what youíre told. So, as I say, the Club of Rome
is one of the big think tanks for the United Nations, and many of its members
interlap with other organizations, world organizations, including the
Bilderbergers and in fact, some of their stuff is read off every year at the
Bilderbergersí meeting, because, as I say, they are the ones who said we cannot
have a democratic society, it doesnít work. And thatís what youíre in
today, youíre under authoritarianism. And Iíll put these links up
too.

Now, Iíve
mentioned before, how step by step every generation is trained from birth, even
from cartoons, by the way, they have them for very young people, even before
they can speak, get the images in their mind of certain things, and then they
give them propaganda through comedies and cartoons and things like that.
And Iíve said for years that a whole generation were bred, really to serve this
new system. They were the ones to grow up and get uniforms on, the black
ones, or the ones that theyíll use overseas in the army and go after the
general public and do what theyíre told. They want to be with the
winners. Thatís all they do in video games is kill folk and win, and your guys
in the brotherhood, the black uniforms, must always win. Thatís all there
is to do with a video game. And these were meant, remember, for the
military. They were to desensitize the people from killing. Most
folk donít naturally take to killing, and they have to be taught and
conditioned to kill automatically, and thatís what video games are for.
So, one generation were raised in it for an army that would go across the world
slaughtering folk for the banks and so on, under many guises. And the
other ones were to be at home, taking lots of steroids, getting awful fat, and
shooting everybody they see. Iíve had so many articles here on cops
shooting people, I wonít even bother to read them off, but thatís the new way,
obviously. And thereís no inquiry, because the only inquiries they ever
do, if the public complain at all, is to have the police investigate
themselves, and thatís it.

Part of the
training too is for this big society they keep talking about. Itís to be
worldwide, not just in Britain. And theyíre training the schools.
Theyíve already trained one generation who donít complain by the way when they
go to the airports because theyíre used to scanners. But itís to go
further and further and further with the ones growing up now. So it will
all be quite normal to them. And its says:

School surveillance: how big
brother spies on pupils

Every day in communities across
the United States, children and adolescents spend the majority of their waking
hours in schools that increasingly have come to resemble places of detention
more than places of learning.

(A: And thatís so true. That is so
true. Even with their groupthink and all the rest of it and psychology
and Pavlovian training goes on.)

From metal detectors to drug
tests, from increased policing to all-seeing electronic surveillance, the
schools of the 21st century reflect a society that has become fixated on crime,
security and violence."

Well, thatís the purpose of it. Itís to train them
for more to come, because youíre going to have perpetual war. And that
means perpetual terrorism. Even though they canít find it, theyíll create
it or whatever, but theyíve got to make you think that itís going to go on
forever. Remember what Carroll Quigley said, you can get more done on a
social level, he says, wars arenít just for profit, thatís a big part of it for
the big corporations, but he said that wars are also meant to change
societies. He says, you can get more social change done in five years of
war than fifty years using propaganda. So, perpetual war and
terrorism. Back with more, after this break.

Hi folks,
weíre back, Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking about the new system
theyíre training the schoolchildren through. Itís an ongoing system and
really being patted down going through security scanners and all the rest of
it. Because itís to get worse and worse, and thatís to be the normal for
them growing up, which will mean that when theyíre adults theyíll think itís
all quite natural for all this to get even worse, I suppose. And it says.

So reads a passage from the
opening pages of Lockdown High, a new book by the San Francisco-based
journalist Annette Fuentes. Subtitled "When the schoolhouse becomes the
jailhouse", it tells a story that decisively began with the Columbine
shootings of 1999, and from across the US, the text cites cases that are
mind-boggling: a high-flying student from Arizona strip-searched because
ibuprofen was not allowed under her school rules;

(A: Theyíve done it for aspirin as well.)

the school in Texas where teachers
can carry concealed handguns; and, most amazingly of all, the Philadelphia
school that gave its pupils laptops equipped with a secret feature allowing
them to be spied on outside classroom hours.

Just about all the schools Fuentes
writes about are united by a belief in that most pernicious of principles,
"zero tolerance". Their scanners, cameras and computer applications
are supplied by a US security industry that seems to grow bigger and more insatiable
every year.

(A: Well, of course it is, because itís big, big
business.)

And as she sees it, their neurotic
emphasis on security has plenty of negative results: it renders the atmosphere
in schools tense and fragile, and in coming down hard on young people for the
smallest of transgressions, threatens to define their life chances at an early
age Ė because, as she puts it, "suspensions and academic failure are
strong predictors of entry into the criminal justice system". There is
also, of course, the small matter of personal privacy.

It would be comforting to think of
all this as a peculiarly American phenomenon. But in the UK, we seem almost as
keen on turning schools into authoritarian fortresses.

(A: Well, that is the agenda, folks. This is
the future for the planet for the next thirty, forty, maybe fifty years.)

Scores of schools have on-site
"campus police officers." One in seven schools has insisted on
students being fingerprinted so they can use biometric systems for the delivery
of lunches and in school libraries. Security systems based on face recognition
have already been piloted in 10 schools, and on-site police officers are now a
common feature of the education system. Most ubiquitous of all are CCTV
cameras: in keeping with our national love affair with video surveillance, 85%
of secondary schools are reckoned to use it, even in changing rooms and
toilets.

(A: Well, Iíll tell you, it would not be me.
It would not be. There would be an awful lot of vandalism if I was back
at school. And there would be. It says:)

Just as the US is home to such
school-security firms as ScholarChip and Raptor Technologies, so we have an
array of companies who can equip schools with a truly Orwellian array of kit.
BioStore offers fingerprint-based ID systems to schools and assures any
potential takers that children's dabs are encrypted into "a string of
numbers", that "cannot be used to recreate a fingerprint image"
nor "used in a forensic investigation". CCTVanywhere's website
features a hooded youth with a spraycan straight out of central casting and a
claim that its cameras can help with help with everything from bullying to
settling legal claims against staff. There is also Classwatch, a CCTV firm
which claims it can "produce dramatic improvements in behaviour".

(A: Itís all about behavior modification. You
see, weíre all under this gun of behavior modification. Youíre getting
that when you watch movies today, by the way, if you donít know it.)

Until recently, its chairman was a
Tory MP called Tim Loughton. As if to signal the links that run between such
firms and our policymakers, he is now under-secretary of state for children.

(A: They all work together, these whatever you want
to call them.)

Now, as the surveillance state
embeds itself in the lives of millions of children, the education bill
currently making its way through parliament promises to extend teachers' powers
to search pupils to the point that, as the pressure group Liberty puts it, they
will be "proportionate to terrorism investigations".

(A: Maybe theyíll waterboard them too, and that
will become normal.)

Teachers will be able not just to
seize phones and computers, but wipe them of any data if they think there
"is a good reason to do so" Ė a move of a piece with new powers to restrain
pupils and issue summary expulsions.

Not entirely surprisingly,
education secretary Michael Gove casts all this as a matter of copper-bottomed
common sense. "Our bill will put heads and teachers back in control,
giving them a range of tough new powers to deal with bullies and the most
disruptive pupils," he said last year,

(A: Itís kind of like, you know, when youíre
looking at a really bad enemy, who tortures their citizens, etc, and you say,
well, we donít do that, you know. But the more you fight them, the longer
you fight them, the more you take on their methods, until you become the
destroyer yourself. And thatís what youíve got. Youíve got a
sado-masochistic school system. And thatís what theyíre training the
students to go into. Because their work life will be much the same way
when they grow up. Sado-masochism. Yes, boss. Yes, boss.)

"Heads will be able to take a
zero-tolerance approach."

Itís like the Soviet Union. You see, the Soviet Union was
like that too. On paper itís a wonderful system. Itís a wonderful
Utopia. Everybody is smiling, happy. Theyíve got good teeth and
everything else. But itís not meant for people to live in, for human
beings to live in. Thatís the problem with it. So, Iíll put this
link up as well, tonight, and you can read all the rest of it for
yourselves. And hereís another article here, this is from Scotland.
It says:

SCOTS children as young as five
are being targeted by teachers in case they have been radicalised by extremist
groups.

(A: No kidding. No kidding, eh.† Itís funny to think that adults write this
stuff. It says:)

The move is part of
counter-terrorism training given to staff at primary schools as part of the UK
Governmentís strategy to deal with the problem.

(A: What problem? At five years of age?)

Teachers at a school in Glasgow
contacted local politicians after undergoing the training, which aims to reduce
the risk of young people becoming involved in extremism.

I guess theyíll never ask for a pay raise when they grow
up, eh? Back with more, after this.

Hi folks, weíre back, and this is Cutting Through the
Matrix. Talking about, across the whole world theyíre really training, at
least the so-called First World countries, theyíre training the children for
the world that theyíll grow up into. And theyíre interrogating children
as young as five now at school. This one is from Scotland. Now, the whole
of Britain has utterly changed from what people used to think Britain was,
because most of the people who are having children now donít speak English as a
first language. Because the British women there were so well trained not
to have children. Just go out and have the material world and a career
and all that, they didnít have any children, so naturally the only ones that
theyíre getting now are people from other countries. And it says, this
part, where itís primarily a Muslim community, it says:

Teachers at a school in Glasgow
contacted local politicians after undergoing the training, which aims to reduce
the risk of young people becoming involved in extremism.

The programme will be rolled out
to other primary schools, while several secondaries and colleges have also put
staff through the initiative, a localised part of the Governmentís Contest
counter-terror programme.

It has sparked concern
counter-terrorism is being added to an already long list of job requirements.
It has also led to accusations that teachers are being forced to spy on young
children in the name of national security.

(A: Now, thereís a big part of this they donít talk
about. And as I say, I saw when they started to open the floodgates in
Britain, and I thought to myself at the time, why from these particular
countries? And I thought, and I told folk at the time. I said, one
day, weíll find ourselves going to war with these countries, and these people
will be revolting back here. And it was like a chessboard that was set up in
advance. And thatís exactly what happened. Because, you see, they
could never have brought in a world government type system with the stable
populations that you had and the still kind of uniform populations that you
had, because everyone knew the rules. They were pretty well law
abiding. You had petty crime, that kind of stuff, normal stuff, but you didnít
have anything called terrorism. And you couldnít have brought that across
the world unless you brought in massive immigration, and then you went over and
bombed their parentsí countries. And thatís what they did it for.
This is a world agenda. Weíre not dealing with fools at the top who plan
this. This is called geo-politics for those who donít understand the
technique. Itís geo-politics. So anyway, it says:)

Senior officials within Glasgow
City Councilís education department have confirmed that staff at Glendale
Primary in Pollokshields had attended the training.

Teachers later contacted
politicians with their concerns. The school is in one of the most predominantly
Muslim communities in Scotland.

The revelation follows the
Coalition Governmentís decision this week to scrap the Prevent part of the
Contest strategy which gives councils a role in fighting extremism.

And theyíve
got spies all through your communities, asking your opinions. Little
chats on the street corners, how do you feel about this and that, and then they
go and report it all. This is a police state. A police state.
Again, you couldnít do it unless you did what Blair said, we must destroy the
British system forever, so it can never go back to what it was by bringing in
the most diverse populations into the country, and thatís what they did.
Nothing happens by accident in this world, on this scale. Nothing at all
happens like that. Nothing. So clever though, isnít it.
Youíve got to admire the techniques thatís used to make it all come into
being. And of course itís okay as long as you have an endless supply of
tax money for the public to keep paying it all.

Now, I wanted to read about the FDA. Itís quite
interesting, this. And Iíve mentioned before about genetics, eugenics,
depopulation and such had been a big concern of the big globalists for a long
time. And no one really cared in the First World countries about it,
because itís always them over there that are going to be killed off, not us,
and thatís the big flaw in your thinking, because the globalists as I say have
no favorites. The peasant of Britain or the US, Canada, is no different
than the peasant of China or Africa to them. And they poison us
off. We know they poison us off, because we have so many diseases now
that are definitely food related, and theyíve broken out since about the
50s. Weíve had inoculations galore and of course, IQs go down, and
everyone is allergic now. Everyone has got a compromised immune system,
and itís just a big mystery as to why itís happening. Itís interesting
too that one fellow who, he watched a thing on Tony Blair when he was running
for the elections, the first elections in the 90s, and Tony Blair got a top
chef in, I think a Korean chef in to entertain a whole bunch of dignitaries and
impress them all. And in 1998, I think it was, and he said, remember, I
donít want any of that GM food ordered. This is before most of the public
heard the word, the term GM, genetically modified food. And this is the
same character that wouldnít eat it himself, who pushed it on the public in
Britain, and made an exemption for the politicians not to eat it, so they got
proper food in, natural food coming in. This is deliberate, folks.
Itís all deliberate.

After years of sweeping the issue
under the rug and hoping no one would notice, the FDA has now finally admitted
that chicken meat sold in the USA contains arsenic, a cancer-causing toxic
chemical that's fatal in high doses. But the real story is where this arsenic
comes from: It's added to the chicken feed on purpose!

Even worse, the FDA says its own
research shows that the arsenic added to the chicken feed ends up in the
chicken meat where it is consumed by humans.

(A: Well, Iíll tell you, thereís a genius at work
here.)

So for the last sixty years,
American consumers who eat conventional chicken have been swallowing arsenic, a
known cancer-causing chemical.

(A: And thereís links to all the effects it has on
you.)

Until this new study, both the
poultry industry and the FDA denied that arsenic fed to chickens ended up in
their meat. The fairytale excuse story we've all been fed for sixty years is
that "the arsenic is excreted in the chicken feces." There's no
scientific basis for making such a claim... it's just what the poultry industry
wanted everybody to believe.

But now the evidence is so
undeniable that the manufacturer of the chicken feed product known as Roxarsone
has decided to pull the product off the shelves.

(A: And the link is there about that too.
It says:)

And what's the name of this
manufacturer that has been putting arsenic in the chicken feed for all these
years? Pfizer,

(A: Pfizer, big pharma business.)

of course -- the very same company
that makes vaccines containing chemical adjuvants that are injected into
children.

(A: And itís amazing too, they use some of these
chickens to inject into us, the same boys, isnít it? And you think itís
all science.)

Technically, the company making
the Roxarsone chicken feed is a subsidiary of Pfizer, called Alpharma LLC. Even
though Alpharma now has agreed to pull this toxic feed chemical off the shelves
in the United States, it says it won't necessarily remove it from feed products
in other countries unless it is forced by regulators to do so. As reported by
AP:

But even as its arsenic-containing
product is pulled off the shelves, the FDA continues its campaign of denial,
claiming arsenic in chickens is at such a low level that it's still safe to
eat.

This is even as the FDA says
arsenic is a carcinogen, meaning it increases the risk of cancer.

So, thereís
your doublespeak for you folks. But itís all an accident, isnít it?
Itís just an accident that theyíre poisoning you. And thatís how most
folk will take it. Well, nobody would really do that on purpose. I
mean, I wouldnít, would you? Thatís how you do it.

Another
article here is from another site. Itís called:

6 Real Examples of Food Terrorism

The latest warning coming from
British intelligence that al-Qaeda and other political organizations could
contaminate the food supply is part of a continuing plot line that hides the
obvious: our food already has been poisoned under the auspices of oversight
agencies who have been complicit in the very real threats to the public food
supply. The following toxins offered into the marketplace by
corporate-government collusion have contributed to far more sickness and death
than E. coli or salad bar terrorists ever will . . . unless of course the
terrorists have bioengineered a superbug, or it has escaped from a bioweapons
lab like the one at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

(A: And they go into pesticides.)

Pesticides: Aside from the fact
that pesticides have been linked to lower IQ in children, thus altering the
future potential of human society,

(A: But it makes them awfully obedient, doesnít
it?)

DDT and the cocktail of other
pollutants and synthetic chemicals now include those used in GM food production
(Bt), such as glyphosate. Even more alarming is that pollutants that have been
banned for decades are still present in 100% of pregnant women, while those
from GM food appear in 80% of unborn fetuses.

(A: Which is a baby, an unborn baby. I prefer
that word.)

The presentation below offers
additional analysis of the health effects, particularly on the immune system:

(A: And you wonder why you have no immune system,
eh? And then, of course, at the top of the list is Fluoride.)

Dr. Paul Connett is leading the
fight against mandatory water fluoridation. People are finally waking up to the
hazards and are now demanding that governments remove this deadly poison. Letís
keep in mind that it was put there with full knowledge of its toxicity and has
led to massive negative health effects. Dr. Connett explains all in a must-see,
one-hour interview.

(A: And they have the links here to that too.)

Mercury: In both organic and
inorganic form, mercury wreaks havoc with the nervous system ó especially the
developing nervous system of a

(A: A child. Iíll put a child or a baby
here.)

It penetrates all living cells of
the human body, and has been documented most as increasing the risk for autism.
This calls into question mercuryís use in dental fillings, vaccines, and just
about anything containing high fructose corn syrup ó

(A: Oh, thatís a killer that one.)

a near staple in the American diet
. . . including baby food.

(A: They actually put that stuff over a heated tank
of mercury vapor. Thatís how itís done to get that fructose corn syrup.)

It has also been known for years
that mercury fumes from CFL compact fluorescent tube light bulbs pose a serious
threat which goes far beyond eyestrain, migraines, and depression, but still
they have been pushed under the green agenda and are set to be completely
phased in by 2014.

(A: And then they go on to
genetically modified organisms:)

Monsanto owns nearly 90% of staple
GMO crops such as corn, soy, and cotton. Monsanto started as a chemical company
that brought the world poisons like Agent Orange and Roundup. Independent
studies of ďfrankenfoodĒ have shown a link to organ failure;

(A: It did it in all the studies theyíve done on
mammals.)

a Russian study has concluded
near-total sterility in GMO-soy-fed hamsters by the third generation;

(A: So it isnít just the first generation thatís
eating it. It literally will hit the second and third generation.)

and other animal studies have shown potentially
pre-cancerous cell growth, smaller brains, livers, and testicles, partially
atrophied livers, and damaged immune systems, according to a comprehensive
article by Jeffrey M. Smith that also highlights the process of intimidation
that even well-regarded scientists have been subjected to when publishing their
research. Perhaps a recent mainstream article theorizing that a massive 64%
increase in bowel cancer among young people is attributable to ďheavy drinking
and obesityĒ should be redirected toward the rise in the prevalence of GMO.

(A: And that is true. You see, these toxic
substances end up in the bowel, and thatís where you end up getting bowel
cancer, because the tissue there literally is radicalized. The cells are radicalized
by the poisons which sit there before theyíre excreted. They never used
to have bowel cancers in places like Scotland, you know, before processed
food. That was pretty well unknown.)

Bisphenol-A:

(A: And this was of course part of the sterility program to
reduce the population.)

The FDA failed to warn the public
about this chemical found in plastic packaging including baby food containers,
baby bottles, and pacifiers.

Mind you,
they knew about it in 1890, what it did to mainly men, really male children, as
early as the fetus, within the first, I think it was eight to twelve
weeks. Thatís when it was going to decide if you were going to be a
healthy male or not. And the mothers who drink a lot of this stuff and
ingest it through different means, even through their cosmetics too, itís added
there as well, just to make sure they get a good dose of it, it will give them
adverse effects and even sterility down the line. So, Iíll put this link
up as well. It goes on and on. Aspartame, of course, that Rumsfeld
pushed through. He used to be the CEO of the company that made it.
Itís just astonishing that the public canít catch on that this is not by
accident. And the sad thing is too, theyíre so well trained, theyíre domesticated
like animals, that even when they hear this stuff, theyíll say, oh, thatís
terrible. But then theyíll go and have it. Theyíll eat it
again. Theyíll say, well, they must really, look at all these experts
testing it. They wouldnít really give it to us if it harmed us. And
thatís the doublethink that they have, because theyíre so domesticated.
Theyíre taught not to think for themselves you see. And thatís terribly
sad, isnít it? Terribly sad.

Yesterday I mentioned the hedge funds grabbing land in
Africa, because thatís where the new line for all their scams goes on.
Theyíve already collapsed the housing industries and all their bubbles and the
hedge funds and goodness knows what else. And now theyíre taking up
massive, massive plots of land along Africa. It says:

Hedge funds are behind "land
grabs" in Africa to boost their profits in the food and biofuel sectors, a
US think-tank says.

In a report, the Oakland Institute
said hedge funds and other foreign firms had acquired large swathes of African
land, often without proper contracts.

It said the acquisitions had
displaced millions of small farmers.

(A: Well, thatís nothing new to these guys.)

Foreign firms farm the land to
consolidate their hold over global food markets, the report said.

They also use land to "make
room" for export commodities such as biofuels and cut flowers.

"This is creating insecurity
in the global food system that could be a much bigger threat than
terrorism," the report said.

(A: Of course, that will be totally ignored. I mean,
terrorism has got to be at the top of the tree, right.)

The Oakland Institute said it
released its findings after studying land deals in Ethiopia, Tanzania, South
Sudan, Sierra Leone, Mali and Mozambique.

It said hedge funds and other
speculators had, in 2009 alone, bought or leased nearly 60m hectares of land in
Africa - an area the size of France.

I donít
know if itís millions, or whatever it is, but itís hectares, anyway. Then
itís got the rest of the story too, and you can go through all that. I
mean, itís just astonishing whatís going on. And you know too, theyíre
going to create the food shortage. This is a must-be, this coming food
shortage, because the Royal Institute of International Affairs thatís always
ahead of the pack, since they work for the boys who cause all these things, and
they must make it happen, have had think tanks on their own site working on
this for sixteen years, the coming food crisis. Nothing in the real world
is sudden and comes out of the blue. It doesnít happen that way in real
life.

Now,
thereís Larry in LA there on the phones hanging on. Are you there
Larry? Iíll try and take you.

Larry: Oh,
yeah, Alan. The word human and animal are synonymous. Itís written
in their War on Drug laws that you cannot make, manufacture, or distribute any
controlled substance to any humans or other animals.

Alan:
Really?

Larry: So,
they consider themselves in the image of their creator, like a god, and the
people at large are just a herd of animals to be controlled and culled out as
necessary.

Alan: I
think youíve got it right on there. Thatís how they see the public.
Absolutely.

Larry:
Several times in their drug laws. But, Alan, I wanted to ask you, have
you heard anything, those three high elected officials in Switzerland were
going to take an arrest warrant through the front gates, through the guards and
deliver it, and arrest Henry Kissinger for war crimes. Did they get
through, or have you heard?

Alan: I
donít think they got through. Mind you, I think eventually they might
relent and allow them to hand it to somebody, which wonít be Kissinger, of
course. But thereís no way that this will happen, because these guys have
diplomatic immunity, these Kissingers, etc. Wherever they go, you canít
arrest them. They have total diplomatic, in fact, they can shoot someone
there and you canít arrest them.

Larry:
Okay.† Thank you, Alan.

Alan:
Thanks for calling. Back after this break.

Hi folks,
weíre back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And itís astonishing as I say,
the articles that you come across. This behaviorism concept, that they
really, all the big world Socialists, and that really are their kings and
queens, because they love Socialism, and the banks love it too. Itís easier
for the banks to lend to whole countries than individuals, and then they own
the countryís governments, and the governments collect the taxes for the
bankers to pay it all back. So, itís a wonderful system, but they also
like Behaviorism. All the things that the George Bernard Shaw types from
the Fabian Society wanted to bring in. And theyíve been doing it.
And article here:

Founder of electric shock autism
treatment school forced to quit (A: the school he was working at.)

The founder of a controversial
school that treats severely autistic and emotionally disturbed children by
shocking them into submission with the use of electrodes has been forced to
quit the institution and serve five years' probation.

(A: Probation. Can you believe this?
With cattle prods, eh. I mean, itís not bad, eh. Like the cops are
doing now, theyíre using these cattle prods that have got wires on them for
us. We are the animals. True enough, isnít it?)

Matthew Israel, a Harvard-trained
psychologist, has created a treatment that is unique to the US and possibly the
world.

(A: No kidding, eh.)

The Judge Rotenberg Center, just
outside Boston, disciplines its students using a punishment machine that Israel
invented called the GED, which gives a two-second electric shock to the skin of
up to 90 milliamps.

At the centre, which was profiled
by the Guardian earlier this year, students wear backpacks around the clock
with the GED electric generators inside them, and are zapped using remote
control devices controlled by their carers.

(A: Carers shock you. Isnít this
Orwellian? Isnít it, eh? Weíre getting so used to getting
brainwashed with Orwellian speech here. Carers shock you. I guess
the government is hiring carers to go across the world and rehabilitate these
so-called terrorists by, you know, caring for them.)

In some cases, they are shocked as
often as 30 times a day as a means of dissuading them from behaviour deemed
dangerous to themselves or others.

(A: Oh, Iíll tell you. The schools will love
to bring all this in to all the schools, eh. And the big boys that give
all the CCTV cameras and all the security stuff, they could make piles of money
on this too, couldnít they?)

The criminal charges brought
against Israel relate to an incident in August 2007 at one of the school's
residential homes where students sleep at night. A call came in from someone
posing as an authorised supervisor, who informed the carers on duty that two
teenagers had misbehaved and should be given shock treatment.

At 2am, the boys were strapped on
boards

(A: That sounds very much like what theyíre doing
in the military.)

and given multiple shocks. One of
the boys, aged 18, was shocked 77 times over a three-hour period and the other
boy, aged 16, was shocked 29 times.

(A: By their carers. Carers, ah.)

It was later discovered that the
initial call had been a hoax.

The Massachusetts attorney
general, Martha Coakley, indicted Israel over allegations that he ordered his
staff to destroy video evidence that revealed exactly what happened that night.

(A: I bet he was getting paid by the Pentagon too,
little, you know, grants here and there.)

Prosecutors had previously ordered
that the video recordings from the home were preserved.

"Dr Israel then attempted to
destroy evidence of the events and mislead investigators, and that conduct led
to his indictments today.

(A: So heís not being indicted because he was
torturing children. No, he was indicted for destroying evidence.)

Today's action removes Dr
Israel from the school and should ensure better protection for students in the
future," Coakley said.

Well, no
kidding. No kidding, eh. I bet theyíll all want this across.
Iíll bet you anything Napolitano will bring them into schools too. Sheís
also doing the same as Scotland, trying to get the children all spying on each
other in school. Maybe they can all wear backpacks and the headmaster can
sit there with all these deviants and sadists and shock the children for fun,
eh. Thatís the world that all of you are allowing to come into existence
because of your silence.

From Hamish
and myself, from Ontario Canada, itís good night. And may your god or
your gods go with you.