W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0

Liam Quin <liam <at> w3.org>
2005-09-08 16:49:37 GMT

[
Notes:
We slipped up in not sending this along with the Last Call
announcement; please caaept our apologies.
We are using bugzilla to track comments on this document;
comments on the MIME-related part of the document may be made
on the ietf-types mailing list or in Bugzilla. See the
"Status of this Document" section for further information.
We are following
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-freed-media-type-reg-05.txt
here, and the text is written to be part of a larger document.
Finally, as for XQuery, we'll probably expand the Security
Considerations after gaining more implementation experience.
]
Registration of MIME Media Type application/xslt+xml
----------------------------------------------------
MIME media type name: application
MIME subtype name: xslt+xml
Required parameters: None.
Optional parameters: charset
This parameter has identical semantics to the charset parameter
of the application/xml media type as specified in [RFC3023].

RE: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0

Scott Hollenbeck <sah <at> 428cobrajet.net>
2005-09-08 16:54:46 GMT

Liam,
The "Published specification" section of the template should include a
pointer (a URL is OK) to the published specification that describes the
media type.
-Scott-
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liam Quin [mailto:liam <at> w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:50 PM
> To: ietf-types <at> iana.org
> Cc: ietf-xml-mime <at> imc.org; public-qt-comments <at> w3.org
> Subject: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0
>
> [
> Notes:
>
> We slipped up in not sending this along with the Last Call
> announcement; please caaept our apologies.
>
> We are using bugzilla to track comments on this document;
> comments on the MIME-related part of the document may be made
> on the ietf-types mailing list or in Bugzilla. See the
> "Status of this Document" section for further information.
>
> We are following
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-freed-media-type-reg-05.txt
> here, and the text is written to be part of a larger document.

Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0

'Liam Quin' <liam <at> w3.org>
2005-09-08 18:48:53 GMT

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
> Thanks, but my point is that you need to put this info in the template
> itself.
OK, noted.
Note that the information is also elsewhere in the published
specification -- it's at the beginning of the document -- since
this Internet Type information is being published as part
of a larger document.
Liam
--
--
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/

Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0

Chris Lilley <chris <at> w3.org>
2005-09-08 20:29:26 GMT

On Thursday, September 8, 2005, 8:48:53 PM, 'Liam wrote:
LQ> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
>> Thanks, but my point is that you need to put this info in the template
>> itself.
LQ> OK, noted.
LQ> Note that the information is also elsewhere in the published
LQ> specification -- it's at the beginning of the document -- since
LQ> this Internet Type information is being published as part
LQ> of a larger document.
LQ> Liam
Liam,
this has come up before as W3C uses the new process. The requirement to
make the registration template an appendix in the spec means that people
tend to forget that the appendix also has the be read as an independent
document by the people here.
The appendix has to make sense as a standalone registrations, so rather
than saying "this document" say "the document at (url) called (title)".
--
--
Chris Lilley mailto:chris <at> w3.org
Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG

Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0

'Liam Quin' <liam <at> w3.org>
2005-09-09 00:46:09 GMT

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:29:26PM +0200, Chris Lilley wrote:
> On Thursday, September 8, 2005, 8:48:53 PM, 'Liam wrote:
>
> LQ> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
> >> Thanks, but my point is that you need to put this info in the template
> >> itself.
> LQ> OK, noted.
>
> LQ> Note that the information is also elsewhere in the published
> LQ> specification -- it's at the beginning of the document -- since
> LQ> this Internet Type information is being published as part
> LQ> of a larger document.
>
> LQ> Liam
>
> Liam,
>
> this has come up before as W3C uses the new process. The requirement to
> make the registration template an appendix in the spec means that people
> tend to forget that the appendix also has the be read as an independent
> document by the people here.
>
> The appendix has to make sense as a standalone registrations, so rather
> than saying "this document" say "the document at (url) called (title)".
Thanks (Chris and Scott and Paul) --
We will publish another round of draft documents very soon, but the set
after that will reflect these and any other comments, and yes, will
have the URI in it

Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0

Martin Duerst <duerst <at> it.aoyama.ac.jp>
2005-09-09 18:25:06 GMT

At 05:29 05/09/09, Chris Lilley wrote:
>this has come up before as W3C uses the new process. The requirement to
>make the registration template an appendix in the spec means that people
>tend to forget that the appendix also has the be read as an independent
>document by the people here.
Just a small point:
There is no requirement that the template be an *appendix*. For many
specs, making the template an appendix will work out fine, but it could
as well be a section or subsection if that works better for the spec
in question.
>The appendix has to make sense as a standalone registrations, so rather
>than saying "this document" say "the document at (url) called (title)".
Yes, indeed. It will be self-referencing .
Regards, Martin.