October 16, 2009

Yeah, I know we already talked about this yesterday — Balloon Day. And I just did an "in the comments" update for that, which I think I'll move to this post, so you'll read it.

Chip Ahoy says:

I can't figure out what the fuss is about. I snap on a thick wide leather cock ring that forces my balls upward and to the front then put on a pair of worn tight-fitting 501 jeans that I wire-brushed the crotch area to bare fibers then position a camera with remote shutter activation directly in front of a stool where I sit spread legged presenting a straight on crotch shot to the camera lens with a mirror behind it so I can more accurately judge the angle with greater accuracy all the time. I usually discard the first few shots until I work out the lighting, then post the best ones on twitter and face book. Where these followers come from, I have no idea. Did I mention I'm very serious about politics?

That Meghan makes the pose appear so effortless and perfectly natural is stunning.

Chris Althouse Cohen says:

56 comments and not one of them says "let's take a closer look at those breasts" or makes any reference along those lines? Is it just too obvious to even say?

MadisonMan answers:

Chris: Yes.

The reference is to this old — and much talked-about — blog post of mine, which I was, in fact, thinking of as I quickly wrote this post. I'm interested to see how many of the lefty liberals and feminist poseurs who loved to say that I was attacking a woman merely for having breasts are saying that Meghan McCain is doing anything more than just having breasts.

And in the cleavage between Chris and MM's comments, we have Mr. Forward saying:

Hey boy, look over there. Balloons!

Ah, yes! How thematically satisfying it was to have Meghan's buffoonish, balloonish breasts rising into the public view on the same day as The Boy's Balloon. Now, the Boy in the Balloon has been downgraded to the Boy in the Box. I don't really know what that portends for Meghan's breasts.

ADDED: peter hoh says:

Chris Althouse Cohen wrote:

56 comments and not one of them says "let's take a closer look at those breasts" or makes any reference along those lines? Is it just too obvious to even say?

I will agree with DBQ who said over in the other thread that there's no way McCain didn't know what the shot showed.

She may not have recognized how other people would react to it, but she must have seen the image and thought about how she looked. Is there anyone who doesn't do that when they see an image of themselves?

Today's selections appear to be a Two Plate Special of breasts and law--

"Hoax or coax", they both involve a form of Incongruent Communication, "a communication pattern in which the sender gives conflicting messages on verbal and nonverbal levels and the listener does not know which message to accept"

Breasts are a gift, and I thank the ladies very much for sharing glimpses of them. But traditionally there is a time and a place to advertise the goodies. That is why clothes were made in the first place. Someone call Hugh Hefner and Meaghan can do a liberated playboy shoot for him and his vast audience just to prove that lustful Republicans have bodies and engage in sex too.

Jeremy...Welcome back to the dull Blog you hate so much reading. FYI I used to be a sycophant commenter but I am well now.Thanks for caring. Oh, does sycophant mean a suck-up? Well I am still working on that character flaw.

My most favorite all time scene in a movie was in the movie Airplane when a pair of bouncing tits appeared before the camera and then suddenly vanished. It was a tour de force. It said so much in that brief 5 second appearance. There was no dialog just tits bouncing up and down.

Chip, My Indian/British husband where's a snap on leather cock ring too-Hugs! He only wears it when we do it though.

My straight girlfriends let me touch their breasts. I do it with much respect and awe. I enjoy cupping them, holding them, talking to them, feeling the corona of the nipple. One straight girlfriend of mine wanted me to paint them which I obliged, naturally.

They said they enjoy me touching their breasts because they aren't threatened by it.

I am not surprised by your story Titus. I have always thought that if you were shameless and a good enough actor to pull it off, pretending to be gay and then as things progressed in the evening letting the woman convert you to the other team, would be a highly effective way to bed women. I was never shamless or immoral enough, or a convincing enough fag, to ever try it though. But I bet it would work.

I have always thought that if you were shameless and a good enough actor to pull it off, pretending to be gay and then as things progressed in the evening letting the woman convert you to the other team, would be a highly effective way to bed women. I was never shamless or immoral enough, or a convincing enough fag, to ever try it though. But I bet it would work..

I definitely would NOT attempt something like this in Vegas. Even the standard "look for the adams apple" doesn't always apply, as they can be surgically removed. Careful what you wish for!

Fags can like tits too though. I don't want to splew on them or anything but I do appreciate their power and like to touch them.

Is there anything wrong with that?

I know quite a few of the gays that enjoy women's breasts but not in a sexual way.

does that make sense?"

It makes perfect sense. I think our attraction to breasts is in some part biological. We have to suck them to live when we are born.

And I don't doubt you like of them is asexual. I was just pointing out that since women will let gay men do things that they wouldn't dream of letting nonlover straight men do and that most women would consider it a huge conquest to get a gay man to sleep with them, pretending to be gay only to be "converted" later, if properly executed would be a very effective way of seducing women.

Triangle Man, you have made my day...I knew something was missing from today's selection.

Their description of how to prepare the box cracks me up. I also love their "aha!" delight in finally breaking through the gift-giving ordeal to arrive at what could be no less than the perfect gift. No shopping, a box, a bow, and something for everyone.

Between the vision of yellow finches hanging upside down and a Box Full of Surprise, my brain is on creative overload. It's a good feeling. In an odd way I find my faith in humans ingenuity restored when I encounter out of the box thinking.

He told me that it makes his hog more sensitive and gets it harder and therefore when he cums it is more intense.

I have heard others say they wear it because it makes the hog look larger.

My husband's hog is a little smaller than average, not much though and I am definitely not complaining. I am not a size queen. One thing the cock ring does though is stretches out his foreskin though which I appreciate. I need to see the head. His foreskin isn't like some though that hangs way over the head which I find interesting but not all together sexy. His foreskin stops midway up the head when it is soft and when hard the entire head does pop out of the foreskin and the foreskin magically immerses itself in the stalk of the hog. If you were to see him hard you wouldn't even know he was uncut.

I support the motion, and would like to ammend it by stating that a group of photos of Meghan McCain would be desirable for comparison purposes. Did she really show more cleavage as usual to the unsuspecting US public?And what other books, besides art literature, does she read?

Titus, what happened to the good ole nose to stalk ratio? I scored really well on that one. So last generation, already?

And as for cleavage picture, I still don't understand the brouhaha. They seem to be totally common. Only the accesories may change, not every lady prefers a book in her hand. Without any effort, I found this quite similar, and interesting photo:http://farm1.static.flickr.com/189/499654941_1dbb7ccdbc.jpg

If she could somehow smother Olbermann amidst the Grand Tetons she'll have done the nation a service! Maybe she could tell him that Daddy's secret plans to bomb Iran are hidden it the gaping maw of the decolletage...it would be his duty as a reporter to quest for the truth, and in his dying, sweaty last breaths he could think he was Ernie Pyle.

I call hoax on Titus. Those special women whose breasts he tenderly cups and holds while carresing their nipple corona's are feeling nothing but his respect and awe for them while he is doing this. What open, understanding, and asexual saints!!

No sexual arousal on their part, just abject gratefulness for his non-threatening admiration.

Nothing sexual about pawing breasts from Titus' perspective--he wouldn't know if the girls find it sexual.

Cock rings are supposed to keep you from losing your erection, not that I use one. I'd hope Titus' Indian/British boyfriend would be young and horny enough for him that he wouldn't need one, but it could be a psychological crotch crutch.

What you said before about Jessica Valenti (and amusingly freaked out about) was stupid and bitchy, and you knew it.

Jeebus you're sad ethan. You're fighting a three year old feud? I just went and read that original thread and can't believe you were in it (here I thought you were some kind of recent incarnation). I mean, if you want to blame somebody, why don't you go after the commenter goesh who drew the original attention to her there?Seriously dude, get over yourself.

The naked woman in Airplane! was none other than Kitten Natividad. In the book Invasion of the B-Girls, she says that her breasts were augmented by injecting silicone directly into them, a process that has to be repeated as the body slowly absorbs the silicone.

If I was in Wisconsin right now I would be having a fish fry at a Supper Club.

Instead I am heading over to Quincy to have sex with my British/Indian boyfriend and ordering takeout tofu. We will be watching the Japensese horror flick Ichti Kills, then heading to The Vinyard. Price of B&B-$450.00/night.

But lets be honest if I was in Wisconsin I wouldn't have a British/Indian boyfriend who is a VP at State Street bank and has really big arms and a fag-won't find that in Scony.