The End Is Nigh: Ruling Class (Including Congressional GOP) Now Openly Seceding From Historic American Nation

Warning

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Rep. David Valadao says he’s not worried that Congress’ failure to pass immigration legislation will hurt his prospects for re-election to a district in California’s agricultural heartland. Same goes for GOP Rep. Jeff Denham, who represents a neighboring district in the state’s San Joaquin Valley.

Still, the California congressmen are making sure voters know they support an immigration overhaul. They’re aware that Democrats will try to turn the congressional gridlock into an advantage during this year’s midterm elections.

Even squishy Republican Congressblob Bob Goodlatte condemned the Obama decree—although notably dodging by saying it was bad “regardless of one’s position on the larger immigration reform question”).

Nonetheless, the Republican reaction to President Obama’s actions seems to speak more of ruffled feathers than moral outrage. Republican leaders like Speaker John Boehner need President Obama to at least pretend to enforce the law for a little, while so that Boehner can betray his supporters and deliver Amnesty to his donors.

Boehner of course had already declared to his donors that he is “hell-bent” on getting Amnesty done, and mocked his own colleagues within the Republican Party. Obviously, Jarrett was telling the truth.

However, Boehner and Jarrett, embarrassed, are now collaborating on a cover story. Thus Boehner’s spokesperson said: “Republicans are committed to reforming our immigration system, but as the Speaker has said repeatedly, it’s difficult to see how we make progress until the American people have faith that President Obama will enforce the law as written.” Jarrett added, lamely, that Boehner only said he would “try.” [John Boehner disputes Valerie Jarret immigration description, by Jake Sherman, Politico, May 16, 2014]

A similar scandal is playing out within Conservatism Inc. Grover Norquist, who has spent his life failing at his stated goal of limiting government, is once again organizing a collection of useful idiots, corporate lobbyists, and self-interested professional minorities to help save Obama’s presidency by passing Amnesty/ Immigration Surge. Last week, Norquist and his allies had a strategy call discussing how Obama “could overcome the hurdle” of Republicans who annoyingly insist that he do his job and enforce immigration law. Their conclusion: there remains a window of opportunity over the summer, once GOP lawmakers had finished their primary elections. [Conservatives prod GOP on immigration, by Russell Berman, The Hill, May 14, 2014]

(This is something I can personally verify, having seen the group blow through an obscene amount of income on overhead with almost nothing actually produced.)

However, though having something with the name “Tea Party” is useful to Norquist’s Amnesty efforts, the scam doesn’t work if the grassroots start seeing through it. Thus Russo frantically backtracked on the Laura Ingraham Show, absurdly claiming to stand with Senator Jeff Sessions and American workers. Not surprisingly, Ingraham was having none of it, questioning him how Amnesty would help American workers. Also not surprisingly, Russo had no answer. [After Backing Amnesty, Tea Party Express Chair Claims He Stands With Sen. Sessions, American Workers, by Tony Lee, Breitbart, May 15, 2014]

What unites Jarrett, Boehner, Cardenas, and Russo: the belief that the current existing American people is the enemy that needs to be somehow overcome.

Nowhere in any of the debates taking place does there seem to be any consideration that the American people have a right not to be replaced. Indeed, nowhere does there even seem to be a consideration that the American people have a right to be heard on this most fundamental of issues.

The ever-predictable fashionable homosexual Andrew Sullivan best summarizes this view in a post decrying the current rise of UKIP, which is increasingly challenging the attempts of British leaders to replace their own people, preferably with Muslims.

Sullivan pontificates that conservatism at its best is “an imaginative attempt to balance stability and change in a manner which makes a society more coherent, more itself.” Yeah, maybe. But then he continues: “At some point, mass immigration or a multi-cultural society or a gay-integrated world becomes the status quo to which conservatives will become attached.” But until that happens and conservatives become properly neutered, he complains, what pops up is unacceptable “fear and anger.” [Conservatives and Immigration, The Dish, May 7, 2014]

Sullivan’s “conservatism” in regards to immigration is a model for what Boehner, Cardenas, and Russo apparently want. Somehow, America becomes “more coherent, more itself” by electing a New People—the only kind of “election,” in fact, the entire political class seems to support. And what they all seem to be afraid of is conservatives—especially whites—having the nerve to protest their dispossession.

Of course, what conservatism has to preserve at the most basic level is the nation and the people itself—otherwise, what is the point of having a military or government in the first place?

But the historic American nation is still there—abused, oppressed, and being ground into the dirt.

Nevertheless, be it through a Republican champion like Senator Jeff Sessions, a Third Party,secession, or some other outlet, the historic nation needs and will find a political expression. At present it is wholly unrepresented in the ruling elite.

Regardless of the outcome of the Amnesty battle, the overt scorn, hostility and corruption being flaunted by the Beltway political class must show Americans that these parasites are in no way “our” leaders.