Ted Cruz (R., Texas) has been a United States senator for only 34 days, but already he is making his mark on national politics. His conspicuous presence and aggressive tone have thrilled his conservative cheerleaders, while inducing fits of rage in liberal detractors and Joe Scarborough.

In the past week alone, Cruz has tangled with veteran Democratic spin-master Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) on Meet the Press, sent a tongue-in-cheek letter to Mayor Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, introduced legislation to fully repeal Obamacare, and recorded no votes on major items, including Hurricane Sandy relief, raising the debt ceiling, filibuster reform, and the confirmation of John Kerry for secretary of state. He also made headlines with his aggressive interrogation of prospective defense secretary Chuck Hagel.

Additionally, Cruzs quick rise to prominence appears to have offended the sensibilities of the political press. During Hagels confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee last week, I overheard multiple groans from other journalists covering the event whenever Cruz began a pointed line of questioning. On Twitter, they noted their exasperation in more colorful ways.

If anything, the 41-year-old Texan has made clear he does not intend to abide by the conventional playbook for new members: Keep your head down, keep your mouth shut, and learn the ropes before inserting yourself into the national conversation.

Thats not Cruzs style. More important, its not what he campaigned on. If I go to Washington and just have a good voting record, I will consider myself a failure, then-candidate Cruz said on the campaign trail in 2012. Last week, in an interview with conservative radio host Mark Levin, Cruz expressed disbelief at how shocked people are when you actually do what you said you would do. In most of America thats to be expected, and yet oddly enough in Washington, D.C., that seems to be unusual, he said.

Republicans are delighted that Cruz, whom many regard as a skilled advocate for conservatism, has decided to play such an active role right off the bat. Any member who has a point of view on a topic should not feel shy about expressing that, says one Republican Senate aide. For someone as talented as Ted Cruz, its vital that we have eloquent conservatives out there arguing for our side.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) sang Cruzs praises in an interview with National Review Online, calling the freshman senator one of the smartest, most articulate guys youll ever meet. Hes ready for prime time on day one, which is pretty unusual for somebody who just got sworn in, McConnell says. Hes a deadly weapon. He is also good company, according to McConnell, who recently accompanied Cruz on a delegation to Israel and Afghanistan.

Republican leaders have already sought to deploy Cruzs talents in critical areas. In addition to being tapped for coveted slots on the Judiciary and Armed Services Committees, Cruz was named vice chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, where he is likely to play a key role in selecting and advising candidates in the 2014 midterm election.

Senate conservatives are similarly pleased to count Cruz among their ranks. For the forces of those who favor limited government, Senator Cruz is a powerful addition, says a conservative GOP Senate aide. Based on our numbers, and the youth of many of these members, were going to have a much stronger voice in the public debate.

Cruz may consider a solid conservative voting record to be a meaningless metric for success, but he has already established one for himself. The Washington Times noted that Cruz has been on the losing end of all eleven votes he has taken so far this year, a record the Texan is perfectly content with.

For example, he voted against the $50 billion Sandy-relief bill, which he decried as a pork-laden mistake. Hurricane Sandy inflicted devastating damage on the East Coast, and Congress appropriately responded with hurricane relief, he said in a statement. Unfortunately, cynical politicians in Washington could not resist loading up this relief bill with billions in new spending utterly unrelated to Sandy.

He was one of only three senators to vote against John Kerrys confirmation to be the next secretary of state, citing the Massachusetts Democrats longstanding less-than-vigorous defense of U.S. national-security issues and, in particular, his long record of supporting treaties and international tribunals that have undermined U.S. sovereignty.

Cruz was also one of the first Republican lawmakers to voice skepticism about the Senate framework on immigration reform, citing deep concerns about the proposed pathway to citizenship. To allow those who came here illegally to be placed on such a path is both inconsistent with rule of law and profoundly unfair to the millions of legal immigrants who waited years, if not decades, to come to America legally, he said.

Cruzs position has put him at odds with Senator Marco Rubio (R., Fla.), who helped draft the framework. The political relationship between the two Hispanic Republicans will certainly be something to watch over the coming months.

Cruz has sought to shape the political discourse in other ways, beyond the confines of Capitol Hill. Last week, he issued a colorful retort to Mayor Rahm Emanuels call for mass-scale divestment from firearms manufacturers.

Cruz sent a letter to the CEOs of gun makers Smith & Wesson and Sturm, Ruger & Co, as well as to leaders of Bank of America and TD Bank, financial institutions that Emanuel specifically urged to cease their relationships with the firearms companies. He slammed the mayors actions and urged the companies to bring their business to his home state.

In Texas, we have a more modest view of government, Cruz wrote. We do not accept the notion that government officials should behave as bullies, trying to harass or pressure private companies into enlisting in a political lobbying campaign.

Matt Mackowiak, a Texas-based Republican consultant, praises Cruz as someone who really understands the outside game, who spends his weekends aggressively traveling the state and meeting with constituents and grassroots organizations. Its only a matter of time, Mackowiak says, before Cruz masters the inside game and starts to have a real impact.

Cruz supporters see him as a natural heir to former senator and soon-to-be Heritage Foundation president Jim DeMint (R., S.C.), one of Cruzs earliest backers. DeMint changed the whole paradigm in the Senate, shook it up in way that you can be a freshman and have a national profile and be aggressive and still be effective, Mackowiak says.

Like DeMint, Cruz has already become a favorite target of the establishment press. The New York Times penned an editorial on January 20 urging Republican leaders to marginalize lawmakers like Mr. Cruz, which began: Ted Cruz, the newly elected Tea Party senator from Texas, embodies the rigidity the public grew to loathe in Congresss last term.

The mainstream press was particularly incensed by last weeks Hagel hearing, where Cruz pressed Hagel to explain remarks he made in a 2009 appearance on Al Jazeera. The senators staff had rolled a big-screen television into the hearing room to play clips of the appearance, in which Hagel concurred with a number of controversial statements from Al Jazeera viewers  that the United States is the worlds bully, and that Israel has been (referring to a specific past event) complicit in a sickening slaughter.

Cruzs blunt approach, and perhaps unorthodox tactics, became a lightning rod for liberal critics, especially after many of them had all but given up defending Hagel, whose performance was widely panned on both sides. Cruz was derided for his bogus attack on Hagel, for hectoring the nominee, for turning the hearing into a clown show, and even for channeling the spirit of Joe McCarthy.

For conservatives, that may be one of the surest signs that Cruz is doing something right.

From the article: In the past week alone, Cruz has . . . sent a tongue-in-cheek letter to Mayor Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, introduced legislation to fully repeal Obamacare, and recorded no votes on major items, including Hurricane Sandy relief, raising the debt ceiling . . .

Oh dear! If Cruz runs for president, he might not carry NJ, or IL. Senate Republicans are supposed to vote "moderate" positions to improve their chances of losing narrowly in big liberal states.

Senator Cruz has probably sunk the Hagel nomination. He showed Hagel appearing on al Jazeera. This is the Arab network founded and financed by the same people who financed and motivated the 9/11 attackers. Less than a decade after the the worst terrorist attack America has ever suffered, Hagel appears on that network and calls America the “world’s bully” and suggests the United States should unilaterally disarm. Secretary of Defense? Maybe in Stockholm. Kudos to Senator Cruz.

Jim DeMint did an awesome job of finding Senators like Cruz, but Sarah Palin put him over the top with her endorsement. Pray for Cruz as his actions will not stand with the R-e, D's, or the press "he is not supposed to act like this, he is a freshman senator".

Go Ted Cruz, I think he may be smarter and more articulate than Rubio. Love them both, thank you to God for their lives.

I like Ted Cruz, however this may be a problem for him in any effort for higher office.

“Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, where his parents, Eleanor Darragh and Rafael Cruz, were working in the oil business.[8][9] His father, in 1957 during the Cuban Revolution, was a Cuban immigrant to the United States.[10] His mother, an American, was reared in Delaware, in a family of Irish and Italian descent.[9][11] Cruz's family returned the U.S. when he was four years old”

RE :”he is no Sharon Angle/Todd Akin for sure. ..... I still can’t believe how those two and the other forgettable idiot from Indiana p*ssed away perfectly winnable U.S. Senate seats. It is almost like the Democrat party paid them enough to take a dive.”

And the colateral damage they caused too, because then ya got the defenders showing that there is many more than one who believes stupid stuff.

There are still more than a few here who claim those should be our model candidates., one recently told me it is *our* fault they lost, if only *we* defended them better they nwould have won, not kidding.

28
posted on 02/05/2013 8:10:07 AM PST
by sickoflibs
(Losing to Dems and Obama is not a principle! Its just losing.)

Cornyn has always looked like Kay Barely Republican. What's interesting is that Cruz has shown such bright conservative light that Cornyn has had to move significantly to the right to be seen at all. This is good.

Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, where his parents, Eleanor Darragh and Rafael Cruz, were working in the oil business. His father, in 1957 during the Cuban Revolution, was a Cuban immigrant to the United States. His mother, an American, was reared in Delaware, in a family of Irish and Italian descent. Cruz's family returned the U.S. when he was four years old

The Constitution? I didn't know anyone still believed in following that old piece of paper. [Actually, if Cruz is not natural born citizen, I would not vote for him. I just didn't know he was born in Canada.] Was his father a US citizen when Cruz was born?

Come on... Gov Goodhair really has done a hellofa lot better for Texas than ANY alternative.

Saying Perry was/is better than the alternative is not saying much. He should have backed Cruz and he showed his colors when he didn't. He even went as far as to tell Palin and others to stay out of Texas' business. Apparently, he failed to realize that who Texas sends to Washington is everyones' business. But La Raza Rick Perry isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer, that much is clear.

In the past week alone, Cruz has tangled with veteran Democratic spin-master Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) on Meet the Press, sent a tongue-in-cheek letter to Mayor Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, introduced legislation to fully repeal Obamacare, and recorded no votes on major items, including Hurricane Sandy relief, raising the debt ceiling, filibuster reform, and the confirmation of John Kerry for secretary of state. He also made headlines with his aggressive interrogation of prospective defense secretary Chuck Hagel. Additionally, Cruzs quick rise to prominence appears to have offended the sensibilities of the political press. During Hagels confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee last week, I overheard multiple groans from other journalists covering the event whenever Cruz began a pointed line of questioning. On Twitter, they noted their exasperation in more colorful ways.

Sounds like some Twittering partisan twits need to find actual jobs.

46
posted on 02/05/2013 7:19:41 PM PST
by SunkenCiv
(Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.