On Dec 30, 6:48 am, quasi <qu...@null.set> wrote:> John Jens wrote:> >... =http://primemath.wordpress.com/>> The obvious error is your claim that a < p.>> But that error was previously pointed out to you.>> And yet you repost the same nonsense.>> Did you really fail to understand the previous objections?>> Or are you simply trolling?>> quasi

I also pointed out that modular considerations, such as the one he isusing,are known NOT TO WORK. One can not lift results from a local field(i.e. mod p)to a global one (i.e. Q) because SHA is an obstruction to the Hasse-Minkowskitheorem.