The Internet has made this the age of the instant political movement. Like-minded people (and even unlike-minded people) can find one another and quickly create a kind of critical mass. The hope, often the expectation, is that these new aggregations can bring positive change to the body politic. This includes seizing new opportunities for democratizing communication and communicating democracy, both of which are urgently needed.

About Me

Former Member, New York State Committee of the Independence Party (73rd AD - Eastside Manhattan) and Former Member, New York City Independence Party Organizations - Manhattan Executive Committee and County Committee, representing the 73rd AD.

Register to Vote

OnTopList

Blogarama

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Trump Used $258,000 From His Charity to Settle Legal Problems

Trump spent more than a quarter-million dollars from his Charitable Foundation to settle lawsuits that involved his for-profit businesses, according to interviews and a review of legal documents.

Those cases, which together used $258,000 from Trump’s Charity, were among four newly documented expenditures in which Trump may have violated laws against “self-dealing”, which prohibit nonprofit leaders from using Charity money to benefit themselves or their businesses.

In one case, from 2007, Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club faced $120,000 in unpaid fines from the town of Palm Beach, Fla., resulting from a dispute over the size of a flagpole.

In a settlement, Palm Beach agreed to waive those fines, if Trump’s club made a $100,000 donation to a specific Charity for Veterans. Instead, Trump sent a check from the Donald J. Trump Foundation, a Charity funded almost entirely by other people’s money, according to tax records.

In another case, Court papers say one of Trump’s golf courses in New York agreed to settle a lawsuit by making a donation to the plaintiff’s chosen Charity. A $158,000 donation was made by the Trump Foundation, according to tax records.

The other expenditures involved smaller amounts. In 2013, Trump used $5,000 from the Foundation to buy advertisements touting his chain of hotels in programs for three events organized by a D.C. Preservation group. And in 2014, Trump spent $10,000 of the Foundation’s money for a portrait of himself bought at a Charity Fundraiser. Or, rather, another portrait of himself.

If the Internal Revenue Service were to find that Trump violated self-dealing rules, the agency could require him to pay penalty taxes or to reimburse the Foundation for all the money it spent on his behalf. Trump is also facing scrutiny from the office of the New York Attorney General, which is examining whether the Foundation broke State Charity laws.

More broadly, these cases also provide new evidence that Trump ran his Charity in a way that may have violated U.S. tax law and gone against the moral conventions of philanthropy.

“I represent 700 nonprofits a year, and I’ve never encountered anything so brazen,” said Jeffrey Tenenbaum, who advises Charities at the Venable law firm in Washington. After The Post described the details of these Trump Foundation gifts, Tenenbaum described them as “really shocking.” “If he’s using other people’s money — run through his foundation — to satisfy his personal obligations, then that’s about as blatant an example of self-dealing [as] I’ve seen in a while,” Tenenbaum said.

Trump founded his Charity in 1987 and, for years, was its only donor. But in 2006, Trump gave away almost all of the money he had donated to the Foundation, leaving it with just $4,238 at year’s end, according to tax records.

Then, he transformed the Trump Foundation into something rarely seen in the world of philanthropy: a name-branded Foundation whose namesake provides none of its money. Trump gave relatively small donations in 2007 and 2008, and afterward: nothing. The foundation’s tax records show no donations from Trump since 2009.

Its money has come from other donors, most notably pro-wrestling Executives Vince and Linda McMahon, who gave a total of $5 million from 2007 to 2009, tax records show.

Trump remains the Foundation’s President, and he told the IRS in his latest public filings that he works half an hour per week on the Charity.

It appeared that Trump may have violated rules against self-dealing.

In 2012, for instance, Trump spent $12,000 of the Foundation’s money to buy a football helmet signed by NFL quarterback Tim Tebow.

And in 2007, Trump’s wife, Melania, bid $20,000 for the six-foot-tall portrait of Trump, done by a “speed painter” during a charity gala at Mar-a-Lago. Later, Trump paid for the painting with $20,000 from the foundation.

Tax Experts say, Trump was not allowed to simply keep these items and display them in a home or business. They had to be put to a charitable use. Trump’s Campaign has not responded to questions about what became of the helmet or the portrait.

Four new cases of possible self-dealing were discovered in the Trump Foundation’s tax filings. While Trump has refused to release his personal tax returns, the Foundation’s filings are required to be public.

The case involving the flagpole at Trump’s oceanfront Mar-a-Lago Club began in 2006, when the club put up a giant American flag on the 80-foot pole. Town rules said flagpoles should be 42 feet high at most. Trump’s contention, according to news reports, was: “You don’t need a permit to put up the American flag.” The town began to fine Trump, $1,250 a day. Trump’s Club sued in Federal Court, saying that a smaller flag “would fail to appropriately express the magnitude of Donald J. Trump’s . . . patriotism.” They settled.

The Town waived the $120,000 in fines. In September 2007, Trump wrote the Town a letter, saying he had done his part as well. “I have sent a check for $100,000 to Fisher House,” he wrote. The town had chosen Fisher House, which runs a network of comfort homes for the families of veterans and military personnel receiving medical treatment, as the recipient of the money. Trump added that, for good measure, “I have sent a check for $25,000” to another charity, the American Veterans Disabled for Life Memorial. Trump provided the town with Copies of the checks, which show that they came from the Trump Foundation.

In the town of Palm Beach, nobody seems to have objected that the fines assessed on Trump’s business were being erased by a donation from a Charity. “I don’t know that there was any attention paid to that at the time. We just saw two checks signed by Donald J. Trump,” said John Randolph, the Palm Beach Town Attorney. “I’m sure we were satisfied with it.”

In the other case in which a Trump Foundation payment seemed to help settle a legal dispute, the trouble began with a hole-in-one. In 2010, a man named Martin Greenberg hit a hole-in-one on the 13th hole while playing in a Charity tournament at Trump’s course in Westchester County, N.Y. Greenberg won a $1 million prize. Later, Greenberg was told that he had won nothing. The prize’s rules required that the shot had to go 150 yards. But Trump’s course had allegedly made the hole too short.

Greenberg sued. Eventually, Court papers show, Trump’s golf course signed off on a settlement that required it to make a donation of Greenberg’s choosing. Then, on the day that the parties informed the Court they had settled their case, a $158,000 donation was sent to the Martin Greenberg Foundation. That money came from the Trump Foundation, according to the tax filings of both Trump’s and Greenberg’s Foundations.

Several tax experts said that the two cases appeared to be clear cases of self-dealing, as defined by the tax code. The Trump Foundation had made a donation, it seemed, so that a Trump business did not have to.

Rosemary E. Fei, a Lawyer in San Francisco who advises nonprofits, said both cases clearly fit the definition of self-dealing. “Yes, Trump pledged as part of the settlement to make a payment to a charity, and yes, the foundation is writing a check to a charity,” Fei said. “But the obligation was Trump’s. And you can’t have a charitable foundation paying off Trump’s personal obligations. That would be classic self-dealing.”

In another instance, from 2013, the Trump Foundation made a $5,000 donation to the D.C. Preservation League, according to the Group and tax filings. That nonprofit’s support has been helpful for Trump as he has turned the historic Old Post Office Pavilion on Washington’s Pennsylvania Avenue NW into a luxury hotel.

The Trump Foundation’s donation to that Group bought a “sponsorship,” which included advertising space in the programs for three big events that drew Washington’s real estate elite. The ads did not mention the Foundation or anything related to charity. Instead, they promoted Trump’s hotels, with glamorous photos and a phone number to call to make a reservation.

“The foundation wrote a check that essentially bought advertising for Trump hotels?” asked John Edie, the longtime General Counsel for the Council on Foundations, when a Post reporter described this arrangement. “That’s not charity.”

The last of the four newly documented expenditures involves the second painting of Trump, which he bought with Charity money.

It happened in 2014, during a gala at Mar-a-Lago that raised money for Unicorn Children’s Foundation, a Florida Charity that helps children with developmental and learning disorders. The gala’s main event was a concert by Jon Secada. But there was also an auction of paintings by Havi Schanz, a Miami Beach-based artist.

One was of Marilyn Monroe. The other was a four foot-tall portrait of Trump: a younger-looking, mid-’90s Trump, painted in acrylic on top of an old architectural drawing. Trump bought it for $10,000.

Afterward, Schanz recalled in an email, “he asked me about the painting. I said, ‘I paint souls, and when I had to paint you, I asked your soul to allow me.’ He was touched and smiled.”

A few days later, the Charity said, a check came from the Trump Foundation. Trump himself gave nothing, according to Sharon Alexander, the Executive Director of the charity. “I’m pretty sure we just left it at Mar-a-Lago,” she said, “and his staff took care of it.”

No comments:

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice, cookies, and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.