SPECIFICATIONS - 35cm L x 9cm W x 31cm H, This is a Cross Body that is Designed for Schooling, Working and Commuting

STYLISH FLOWER DESIGN - New Flower Design for people who love Unique Flower Styles. Various styles ensure that everyone could find the pattern they love

CONVENIENT - Main open zipper compartment in the exterior with 1 back zip pockets designed to provide easy access to your items such as keys, ids, transportation cards and more other items.

ORGANIZED - Redesigned interior compartment just for you. 1 main compartment 1 interior zip pocket and two small pockets for other items that can hold daily essentials such as USB, wallet, cash and coins, and stationary.

COMFORTABLE - The Cross Body is designed with A High quality canvas and soft rainbow shoulder strap to reduce the stress on your shoulders to maximise the overall comfort while carrying the bag.

In a Helly Jacket Silk Cis Women's Hansen Squamish r8AwCqrIxX that removes a late-breaking obstacle from Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson's insurgent Senate bid, the New Mexico Supreme Court today struck down a unilateral move two weeks ago by Democratic Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver to reinstate the Land of Enchantment's "straight ticket" ballot option, whereby voters can select a political party's entire slate of candidates by filling out just one oval.

The New Mexico state legislature—with the signature of then-Gov. Gary Johnson—had in the process of changing voting mechanisms in 2001 repealed the part of the election code specifying that ballots had to "permit each voter…to vote a straight party ticket in one operation." It took the 2010 election of a Republican Secretary of State, Dianna Duran, to finally remove the one-punch option from the state's ballots, after which Democratic lawmakers have periodically tried and failed to legislate the option back.

Toulouse Oliver, who had been talking up the virtues of straight-ticket balloting on grounds of making voting easier months before Johnson suddenly entered what had previously been a sleepy Senate re-election coronation for incumbent Democrat Martin Heinrich, nevertheless provoked widespread claims of partisan skullduggery with her Aug. 29 decision, which came without so much as a single public hearing.

"Until the legislature makes a decision one way or the other, the Secretary of State cannot," Chief Justice Judith Nakamura said when handing down the decision. "This power is theirs alone, and the Legislature has indicated its intent to thoroughly regulate how ballots appear."

The successful court challenge was filed by the state Libertarian and Republican parties, as well as Democratic write-in candidate Heather Nordquist, and the independent-supporting Unite New Mexico.

"This is a longer-standing, much more complete decision than I thought we would probably get today," New Mexico Libertarian Attorney General Candidate Blair Dunn, who filed the initial complaint, told NM Political Report.

The state Supreme Court decision comes just a week the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reinstated Michigan's 2015 legislative ban on the straight-ballot option, and seems to cement the notion that courts aren't fond of either bureaucrats or judges usurping the will of state legislators when it comes to this type of voting mechanism. Combined with the recent trend of states dropping the device, one-punch will now only appear in eight states this November: Alabama, Indiana, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas (which is ending the practice in 2020), and Utah.

Today's victory for independents and third-party candidates comes as a welcome tonic, but the default electoral reality remains rules and regulations written by self-interested members of the two largest political parties, at the expense of any would-be competitors. Just yesterday, for example, the Arizona secretary of state ruled that the Libertarian Party will not feature any candidates on the November ballot for the first time in 20 years, due directly to a 2015 law that Republicans passed deliberately to blunt the growing influence of the nation's largest third party.

As Libertarian Party National Chair (and Phoenix mayoral candidate) Nicholas Sarwark tweeted after the New Mexico news:

Libertarians don't want any special treatment from the election authorities around the country, we just want them to stop helping our old party opponents cheat.

Canvas Design Flower Apricot Craze Messenger Womens Flower Bag Shoulder London Trendy Body Cross Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

But now how will single mothers juggle elderly Veterans while their children vote?! ... Or was it elderly children juggling single veterans while mothers vote? I can't remember who she said straight-ticket voting helped.

Yeah, I agree. This is totally an example of toxic masculinity taking advantage of women. I mean, think about it, a court rejecting something that blocks johnsons? Definitely an example of the right-wing's demand to eradicate birth control.

Why should people not be allowed to vote as they please? Yeah, 'vote the D ticket' is obnoxious but if obnoxious were sufficient to make it illegal, every asshole who voted for the hag should be disenfranchised. Seriously, can anyone offer a libertarian argument here?

"BUT subject to this proviso: that there should be an option of casting a straight-ticket NOTA vote, rejecting everyone by filling out one bubble."

Maybe. I live in SF. The chance of me voting for a candidate is slim (Starchild, are you running this cycle?) But I do vote (ineffectively) on the various ballot issues, so even as a "l" voter, I'm not seeing any sort of real equivalence, and if it were, it's still the gov't granting me the same as the tribes. Gov't grants not my style. Not finding that a libertarian argument.

Johnson KNEW what he was doing as governor years ago striking down party line voting when he was a Republican, more than a decade before he would run as a third party for the Senate, but this is still two dimensional chess, complete amateur night. To piss in the tall grass he needs to think 6 steps ahead like Trump.