4 thoughts on “Video: The Truth About Refugees: Debt, Destruction and Demographics”

Great video Brian.
One additional point not made about 911 and the “seeking them out” – we have held the so-call “mastermind” of this plot in Gitmo for about 15-16 years – some sheik. We even waterboarded him, but somehow, this “exceptional” country of mine has not tried him for his crimes. Not ONE trial held. Its such a farce. The war on terror is a hoax. The bombings have to stop, the people need to go back to their countries and unfortunately we need to fix their country’s infrastructure because we destroyed it.

Not a huge fan of Gitmo and waterboarding etc. We never know about future governments and what they may do. If you go into US Law, everyone is basically an insurgent etc.
That said, I hear you. The violence, bombing and all the rest needs to stop. The war on terror is a hoax for war. But this has been the case forever as a distraction or vying for
power or both. We will see more of this (unfortunately) Saudis need to be cut off from all money. What gets me is the BIS, IMF, World Bank watch every single money transfer. This means they know everything and it is precisely this power that allows them to get away with it for no one can really stop them.

Nicely documented if not a bit busy, jumpy and subsequently hard to follow. For me, one thesis of yours is that our wars in the Mid-East were for access to oil, to guarantee supply and especially give us preferential treatment. That seems plain enough if you dig below the “advancing democracy” palaver. But your take on immigrants seems to go in two directions. (1) We’re decimating the Mid-East to take their oil AND their citizens because we want them to be our citizens (Is Trump OK with that?). We want those immigrants for ourselves because they’ll supplement our flagging birth rates and as assets ultimately help pay off our burgeoning debts. (2) They’re a welfare drain on our economies and will impose enormous financial costs. You cite Germany as maybe a worst case situation.
So do you mean #2 to be a short-term problem which ultimately will give way to #1 as a long-term benefit once the immigrants are assimilated, educated, and become productive at a high level? (You never actually said this if that’s your point.)
If so, why the worry about robots/AI displacing immigrants from their low-level jobs? Are immigrants a boon or bust for our economies because of social welfare costs and the impending displacements from AI?
This is respectful advice. As a retired school teacher I admire your wealth of slides and graphs but I think you need to hone your message so that (1) you’re really clear about what you’re trying to prove. Lay out your conclusions at the beginning of the film saying (and showing your conclusions) that after 20 min. I want to convince you about statement1, statement2, etc. (2) Then your slides, articles, etc. need to be marshaled to prove everything you promised in (1). Once you enumerate your various theses, then your data should fall neatly into place.
I enjoyed your video and hope my friendly advice does not seem supercilious; you clearly like to research issues and if you can hone, craft, your message you’ll be much more effective at making your points.
All the best.

I love your advice and you are right. The scope was more a broad overview as to what people are not getting told by MSM. This could have been a much longer vid to go into more depth on some of what you are talking about. There are about 3-5 things that could be their own 15-20 min piece. AI is such a huge factor in any equation moving forward immigrants, illegal aliens or not. All this being issued, this issue is extremely complex and your comments, the youtube comments and so on are good highlights that this is bigger than the ‘diversity’ and ‘humanitarian’ pitch we are being given. This constantly evolving and we will surely touch on it again moving forward. Access to oil is a smaller component to access to human capital/resources or, if you want to look at it the other way, depleting the ‘enemies’ human resources. If you go +100 and he goes -100 it is a spread of 200. You factor in debt interest, reconstruction loan interest costs, looting of the carbons and so on + the territory/real estate advantage this game has so many moving parts. Appreciate you taking the time to critique!