Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Did Lance Patten receive ineffective assistance of counsel in 2002 when he plead guilty to the charges of Reckless Endangerment, a Class C Felony; Disorderly Conduct, a Class B Misdemeanor; Preventing Arrest or Discharge of Duties, a Class C
Felony; Fleeing, a Class A Misdemeanor; two counts of Contact with Bodily Fluids, Class C Felonies and; Reckless Driving, a Class B Misdemeanor ?
2. Should Lance Patten be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas and enter not guilty pleas to the charges against him?
3. Should Lance Patten be found not guilty by reason of insanity for the crimes when a psychological evaluation determined that he was not criminally responsible for the offenses due to his mental condition?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Is it ineffective assistance of counsel to allow a client who is trial competent and wants to plead guilty to enter a guilty plea?
II. Is it manifestly unjust to deny a withdrawal of a guilty plea which was knowingly and voluntarily entered, so that one may assert a defense which was knowingly forfeited?