United States v. Samuel

August 4, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,v.MALIK SAMUEL, A/K/A/'SIZZLES" DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Richard J. Arcara United States District Judge

ORDER

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Defendant filed a motion in limine to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement after he involved his right to remain silent be granted. On July 6, 2010, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant's motion in limine to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement after he involved his right to remain silent be granted. The Magistrate Judge filed a corrected Report and Recommendation on July 14, 2010.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder's Report and Recommendation, defendant's motion in limine to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement after he involved his right to remain silent be granted.

This case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further proceedings.

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.