Super Talent 8GB DDR3-1600 CL9 Memory Review

At Overclockers, we rarely present cheaper, more standard products, but not all users need pricey high-end memory. For all who are searching for cheaper RAM, I wish to present Super Talent 8 GB DDR3-1600 kit. Let’s take a look at Super Talent memory and find out if it meets your expectations.

Specification and Photo Gallery

In the standard plastic box we can find two 4 GB sticks of memory, so an 8 GB kit without additional heatspreaders. There is no additional information about support contact, warranty, or anything else as we are used to seeing on a memory package.

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – box

Specification

Product Number: W1600UX8GV

Rated speed: DDR3-1600 / PC3-12800

Density: 2×4 GB ( Dual Channel )

SPD Profile: 1600 11-11-11-28 1.50 V

XMP Profile: none

Yes, as you probably noticed there is no XMP profile. Memory is marked as CL9 and that’s all. There is no specification with even basic timings, but I assume it will be DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 and I will test this memory at these settings.

Motherboards see SuperTalent DDR3-1600 memory as 11-11-11-28 using auto settings. Simply, there is no shortcut and you have to set timings manually.

Below is full timing list set by Gigabyte Z87X-OC motherboard. Main timings were set manually.

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – Mem Tweak It

Here is also CPU-Z screenshot as many users can’t live without this software …

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – CPU-Z

Super Talent used Micron D9QBJ chips, so the IC is designed to work at 800 MHz ( DDR3-1600 ) 11-11-11 and 1.35 V. We can also see that maximum operating temperature for these chips is 95 °C, so we don’t have to worry that they will overheat without additional cooling or heatsinks.

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – Micron IC

Now let’s take a closer look at Super Talent Value DDR3-1600 CL9 …

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Stability Testing

The Super Talent memory passed a couple of hours Memtest86+ 5.00 RC1, so I assume it’s stable enough. This is the latest version of Memtest86+ which is multi-threaded, so it’s also stressing memory controller much more.

There were no issues during Memtest at the declared by manufacturer settings, and no issues when using Windows software, so I think we can move to performance testing.

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – Memtest86+ 5.00 RC1

Performance Testing

Test System

Intel Core i7 4770K @ 4.2 GHz

Gigabyte Z87X-OC

Corsair HX850, 850 W 80+ Silver PSU

Crucial M4 64 GB AHCI

Windows 7 Ultimate

Memory Kits

SuperTalent 2×4 GB DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24

Crucial Ballistix Sport XT 2×8 GB DDR3-1866 10-10-10-30

Geil Veloce 2×4 GB DDR3-2133 10-11-11-30

Kingston HyperX 10th Anniversary 4x4GB DDR3-2400 11-13-13-30

G.Skill TridentX 2×4 GB DDR3-2400 10-12-12-31

ADATA XMP V2 2×8 GB DDR3-2600 11-13-13-35

All memory kits were set to XMP profile (highest clocked one) settings declared by manufacturer. SuperTalent memory has no XMP profile so main timings were set manually while all other timings at auto.

Test Software

HyperPi 0.99b

AIDA64 Memory & Cache benchmark

MaxxMem v1.99

7-Zip x64

Cinebench 11.5

CPU-Z 1.65

ASUS MemTweakIT 2.00.01

HyperPi 0.99b

HyperPi 32M really likes fast memory, so it’s one of the best tools to compare memory kits. Best result was marked in red so we can see that Super Talent DDR3-1600 kit was about three minutes slower than the G.Skill DDR3-2400 !!!

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – HyperPi 32M

MaxxMem v1.99

MaxxMem Preview v1.99 is showing us single threading memory performance.

Memory write isn’t bad in this benchmark as it based on CPU and memory controller speed, but memory read and copy don’t look so good. Memory copy result is nearly 5 GB/s worse while read is 2 GB/s worse than the second worst memory in this comparison.

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – MaxxMem Preview 1.99

AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark

3.0 version of AIDA64 brought us multi-threading tests, so memory bandwidth is much higher than in previous versions.

About 4 GB/s worse results in every test than the Crucial memory says a lot. We are used to seeing that DDR3-1600 CL9 memory is about as fast as DDR3-1866 CL10, but in this case it’s not even close in any of the bandwidth tests.

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – AIDA64 3.0

7-Zip x64

As we see in 7-Zip compressing-decompressing benchmark, the Intel Haswell memory controller can make good use of faster memory. Above DDR3-2133 mark there are no big changes, but below that mark the results are much lower. SuperTalent is far from other RAM in the comparison, achieving over 2 MIPS (Million Operations Per Second) and lower result than the average in this test.

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – 7-Zip x64

Cinebench 11.5

Cinebench rendering benchmark is really popular among overclockers. It’s hard to say which memory is really best looking at this benchmark, but for sure there are some differences in the results depending on what memory kit we use. Super Talent, as expected, is again last but I wouldn’t call it any issue as all results are close to each other.

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – Cinebench 11.5

Overclocking

Not expecting much from value series memory, I started to overclock the Super Talent DDR-3 1600 CL9 kit and I was surprised. Memory is running stable at 1066MHz (DDR3-2133) 10-11-11-30 1N 1.60V. It’s a really good result, however I’m still disappointed looking at performance after overclock. We can compare it to Geil EVO Veloce DDR3-2133 10-11-11-30 2N memory, which in earlier tests was about 93 seconds faster in HyperPi.

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – Maximum Stable OC

Here is the maximum overclock result I was able to get. For some reason raising voltage above 1.75 V or setting more relaxed timings didn’t help to stabilize even 1200 MHz (DDR3-2400), but the memory was able to enter Windows at 1300 MHz (DDR3-2600) and not so loose 11-13-13 main timings.

Super Talent DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 – Maximum OC

Final Thoughts and Conclusion

When someone mentions Super Talent, I have Elpida Hyper memory on my mind, which was very popular among overclockers couple of years ago. Looking at our DDR3-1600 review sample, I feel a bit disappointed. I realize it’s value series memory, but something is missing.

As we can see in the tests, performance is quite low. It may be caused by the memory’s single sided design, but with current availability of new ICs it’s hard to do something else to get 4 GB sticks no matter if we pick Micron, Hynix or Samsung.

Even if we skip performance, we expect to be able to use this product without any issues at least. Regular computer users who wish to build their PC, or at least add some more RAM to their existing computers, may have some problems as this memory doesn’t have XMP profiles and all settings have to be set manually to meet the declared specification. Here is the next issue, as there is no information on the memory or the package what is this specification except DDR3-1600 CL9. Motherboards will set this memory to 1600 CL11 or 1333 CL9 when we use auto settings. Also, the manufacturer website isn’t more helpful as provides exactly the same information as the memory label, so DDR3-1600 CL9 1.5 V.

I also can’t say that the price is good. After browsing online stores the cheapest offer that I found was ~$65, while most stores are selling this memory for at least $75. In this price we can actually find DDR3-1866 or even DDR3-2133 kits.

Overclocking is the only good side of this memory. 2133 10-11-11 settings are more than we can see in most available DDR3 2133 kits. This doesn’t change the fact that performance isn’t really good even at a higher clock, and results are much lower than the Geil Veloce which in this review is running at exactly the same main timings and clock.

Summarizing, Super Talent Value DDR3-1600 CL9 is just standard memory without any additional features or even average performance. Since there are better options at a similar price, so it’s hard to recommend this memory. If price was lower, then it could be good for really cheap desktop PC configurations. It’s not designed for overclocking, but that’s the only thing it’s good at, but overall performance is killing even that advantage.

Related Stories

I ordered these stick from ewiz to go with my HTPC upgrade. The other components of the upgrade included a Phenom II X2 545 (currently running at 3GHz and unlocked to an X4) and MSI 760GM-E51. But since this kit is labeled "Performance Series," I figured I would see how much performance I could get out of them.
Since P55 is known for its amazing ability to overclock memory, I began testing on a Gigabyte P55A-UD6 with the following results... Read More

Samsung has sent us a 2x4 GB DDR3-1600 very low profile and low voltage memory kit to review. Samsung has been in the memory business for over 18 years and as you will see, this kit really shows their experience in the memory area. Read More

VisionTek has given Overclockers.com a chance to review their 2x4 GB DDR3-1600 MHz (PC3-12800) RAM. Outside of videocards and other components, VisionTek is in the memory business as well! Let's see if the little known RAM segment can produce some solid results like its AMD videocards. Read More

Single-sided Hynix MFR ICs have been making the rounds through various manufacturers recently. I didn't give G.Skill a pass for them when they came through last time. They just don't have the performance to go with the MHz due to timing compromises to make it to these kinds of frequencies. ADATA is here to give it a try this time. Let's hope they reverse the performance sacrifices made for the MHz. Hey, if nothing else, MFR kits are always fun to see how far they can be pushed! Read More

Today we're going to have a look at an insanely-spec'ed memory kit, G.Skill's high frequency, 2x4 GB DDR3-2933 TridentX kit. It is designed for one thing - hitting extremely high frequencies on the Intel Haswell platform. Of course, people looking to buy such a kit want to know how it performs too, so we'll look at that for you as well. Read More

wondering if the sub timings are super relaxed like the main timings were that could be part of whats missing.

As you see on the MemTweakIt screenshots , sub timings are rather tight. I think it's more because of single sided modules. Ballistix Sport XT which is in the same comparison is based on about the same IC but double sided modules ( 2x8GB ) and performance is much higher.

Yesterday I was testing RipjawsX 2x8GB 1866 that seem to be on similar IC and performance is slightly better than the Crucial Ballistix.

What is funny , all these 3 kits are booting at max 2600 11-13-12 1.65V but none of them can pass HyperPi 32M or any other longer test at more than 2200 and max stable settings were 2133 10-11-11-30 CR 1 or 2.