On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 03:10:46PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> Yes that's true. That was a quick fix to temporarily take care of this
> problem.
With something like this I think it's probably as well to just revert
the original commit until we've got things sorted out, having the
feature sort of implemented but totally unusuble is probably worse than
not having it at all.