I called it ...

I agree with that completely. Minnesota got what was supposed to be the final piece to their puzzle in a good quarterback, and we got to start what should be the next generation in Packer football with Aaron Rodgers. A-Rod has done a fantastic job as QB, and hopefully we can win @ Arizona and the Queens can lose, so we finish with the same record. I believe that could go a long way to saying "Hey, we can be productive without you. Have fun being a Viking."

Click to expand...

I agree! Plus I got relatives in AZ so IF we lose then I'd never hear the end of it:icon_biggrin:

I agree with that completely. Minnesota got what was supposed to be the final piece to their puzzle in a good quarterback, and we got to start what should be the next generation in Packer football with Aaron Rodgers. A-Rod has done a fantastic job as QB, and hopefully we can win @ Arizona and the Queens can lose, so we finish with the same record. I believe that could go a long way to saying "Hey, we can be productive without you. Have fun being a Viking."

Click to expand...

I can agree with that too.

Vikes got a has-been who's dismal playoff/SB record can go away while the Pack has the promise of the next generation QB in A-Rod when he has good pass protection.

I agree with that completely. Minnesota got what was supposed to be the final piece to their puzzle in a good quarterback, and we got to start what should be the next generation in Packer football with Aaron Rodgers. A-Rod has done a fantastic job as QB, and hopefully we can win @ Arizona and the Queens can lose, so we finish with the same record. I believe that could go a long way to saying "Hey, we can be productive without you. Have fun being a Viking."

Click to expand...

I can agree with that too.

Vikes got a has-been who's dismal playoff/SB record can go away while the Pack has the promise of the next generation QB in A-Rod when he has good pass protection.

Good bye and good riddance to the old school
Hello and welcome to the new school.

Just when you're about to convince me, you write something really foolish.

If there is so much "talent" available, why can't TT sign any or draft any? Every O-line draft pick he's made in 5 years has needed continual baby-sitting and remains terribly inconsistent.

I guess my thought processes are really on a different level than most of you guys.

Click to expand...

In THIS upcoming draft I said. I haven't looked over the depth of talent in the other drafts. This is just an opinion, but I think T.J. Lang could be a great Tackle for us for years to come. He looks to have some good skill sets, but he does need to work on a few things of course. I'm not saying TT hasn't been inconsistent, just saying you have to look at the talent in the drafts too. Take that into consideration. I'm by no means a TT apologist though. He's made some awful picks in the past few years.