Using simple logic to debunk "9/11 Truth" and "New World Order" conspiracies.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

No Matter What Happens, THEY Planned It.

The same people/government/world government/secret society that perfectly executed 9/11 somehow completely botched the invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq?

The same people that are trying to enslave us with their financial system have somehow allowed their entire financial system to collapse in the matter of a few months?

The "Truthers" will have a clever response. The best part about conspiracies is that they explain EVERYTHING. So...- If Iraq went great, it was part of their plan for oil. But now that's it is dreadful, it's part of the master plan to create chaos in the region!- If the world economic system went great, it was part of their plan for world domination. But now that it is dreadful, it's all part a master plan for a new economic system!

2 comments:

Woow! I've never seen a post so full of inaccuracies and misleading twisted reasonings. U know, u do more harm than anything else with this kind ignorance my friend, either u are with the "Truther" or against, but in both cases the most important is thing to bring solid arguments to the table backed up with a plausible dialectic. Yet, the arguments and the structure of your post was the one of a kid, an arrogant one moreover. The difference between "Truthers" and "Believers" is that Believers claim to hold the truth, whereas Truthers are still looking for it. Plus, a posteriori, u make urself look like a fool when u say ingenuous things like "The same people that are trying to enslave us with their financial system have somehow allowed their entire financial system to collapse in the matter of a few months?", don't u think?At last, i'd add that, generally speaking, it is more healthy and secure to believe that "Nothing is as it seems" than the naive and almost unbelievable "Everything is as it seems", even though the truth is somewhere in the middle. Or nowhere.

Tell us great master, to what extend did the US "botch" the invasion of Irak? What is "botch" in your mind? Is securing the ministry of oil and natural resources within days, avoiding any tempering with the oil extraction infrastructure and subsequently make billions of it a way to "botch" things? Do u really think the US interest stopped making money as soon they "left" the country? Obviously not, they still control the oil flow. And still make billions.

U think they "botched" the occupation? What did u expect by occupation? Did u think the US would proclaim the United States of Middle East? Plant a flag in a dune like on the moon and open a Starbuck's and then it would become the 51th state? Not at all my friend.According to most of the conspiracy theories, the goal wasn't to create an american democracy nor a stable nation crowded with free pink unicorns dancing the gangnam style over there but merely to destabilize the whole region [divide to conquer], create a long term base, increase their influence and obviously... control the resources and make bucks.

If u ask me, I think u really should READ the theories beforehand if u intend to "debunk" them.