Hi there! Do you like shiny new things? You should join our Pro Tester Program. ;) If you're already a member and haven't received an invite from us to test something recently, let us know!

Webhooks, so we can add our own functionality

howthebodyworks says:

Why not add in those new fangled "webhooks" so we can add new functions to RTM ourself. that's what github does - and it works great for me. So do less geeky producitivity services like freshbooks, for that matter , and many other services besides - there is a list here, including someone (not me, so there's now at least two people who like it ;) ) suggesting that RTM is an ideal candidate fr webhook support

It's a little geeky, I know, but I see lots of people asking for RTM functionality that could be all solved at once if there were webhooks, and a lot of them are asking for very geeky things, so they shoudl be comfortable with this reasonably mild form of extensibility.

Posted at 12:52am on May 26, 2010

erlang says:

Very good idea! Thanks for sharing.

Posted 4 years ago

erlang says:

What kind of hooks are you thinking of? Adding / editing tasks?

Posted 4 years ago

kutyshalev says:

Once I read up on what this is, I realize this would be unbelievable. As a development company, I can see using RTM inside applications!

Posted 4 years ago

jvgreenaway says:

A hook for every action would be amazing! As part of the POST/JSON/XML include the action for routing/filtering at the other end.

Posted 4 years ago

jeduncan says:

has there been any movement on this?!

Posted 2 years ago

marcus.povey says:

Double +1 for me.

Posted 2 years ago

rubdottocom says:

+1, RTM extensibility will be easier to implement, I worked with evernote webhooks and give you amazing flexibility