Thread: What's the verdict on the new JD 910?

I've never used JD on a regular basis but was looking at a package deal today that included a new JD 910 and was wondering what the verdict was on this mower. It had a 48" deck with a 22 kawi. I think the configuration would be sufficient but was wondering how a mulch on demand deck would work with that mower or if you have to step up to a 920 to even have that option? Thanks.

The 910 is actually 20.5 HP. The 22 number was under the old rating system. The MOD isn't an option on a 910. You'd need to step up to the 920 to get a MOD, and only the 48" MOD is available on the 920. I believe the 910 with the 48" deck is fine for normal cutting, but it will starrt to lack power if the grass is wet and or thick and there are any hills involved at all.

A lot of guys on here have bought them and replaced the throttle plate with one from a 920 which is the only true difference between those two engines. It's about a $40 part and an hour or so of your time to do. There's a thread in the mechanic & repair forum if you do a search on it there.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darryl G

I can also tell by looking back to see how they're hanging and often reach back and feel them to see how firm they are.

The 910 is actually 20.5 HP. The 22 number was under the old rating system. The MOD isn't an option on a 910. You'd need to step up to the 920 to get a MOD, and only the 48" MOD is available on the 920. I believe the 910 with the 48" deck is fine for normal cutting, but it will starrt to lack power if the grass is wet and or thick and there are any hills involved at all.

A lot of guys on here have bought them and replaced the throttle plate with one from a 920 which is the only true difference between those two engines. It's about a $40 part and an hour or so of your time to do. There's a thread in the mechanic & repair forum if you do a search on it there.

Yea, I thought I had read on the JD website that the MOD is only available on the 920. That would be a nice option to have, especially around apartment complexes, but I'd prefer the 26HP option with that feature. It seems most people on here agree that more HP is better while mulching. Thanks for the input.

I run a Z950 with a 60" MOD. It has more than enough power for the MOD, but yea, more is always better for mulching, no doubt.

The MOD is far better with OEM wavy mulching blades than it is with the std high lifts for all around cutting. Several of us here run our MOD's like that and have been quite happy with them set up that way.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darryl G

I can also tell by looking back to see how they're hanging and often reach back and feel them to see how firm they are.

I run a Z950 with a 60" MOD. It has more than enough power for the MOD, but yea, more is always better for mulching, no doubt.

The MOD is far better with OEM wavy mulching blades than it is with the std high lifts for all around cutting. Several of us here run our MOD's like that and have been quite happy with them set up that way.

Definitely agree about the OEM's. I've used OEM's on my Scag TT in regular side discharge mode and they made a difference, in the fall. The MOD would be nice for me because I've ranged from mowing a retirement community with bermuda sod one day to a 30 acre industrial plant with two weeks of growth the very next day. It's tough to find one machine that can do it all.

The 910 is actually 20.5 HP. The 22 number was under the old rating system. The MOD isn't an option on a 910. You'd need to step up to the 920 to get a MOD, and only the 48" MOD is available on the 920. I believe the 910 with the 48" deck is fine for normal cutting, but it will starrt to lack power if the grass is wet and or thick and there are any hills involved at all.

A lot of guys on here have bought them and replaced the throttle plate with one from a 920 which is the only true difference between those two engines. It's about a $40 part and an hour or so of your time to do. There's a thread in the mechanic & repair forum if you do a search on it there.

A 20.5 hp engine on a 48" deck reg mowing will not lack power - I run that same combo now.

A 20.5 hp engine on a 48" deck reg mowing will not lack power - I run that same combo now.

There's several of guys on here (especially in the HO forum) who own a 910 and many of them would disagree with you, and have done so already in other threads. With the size of the pumps and the weight of the machine itself, it's getting close on power on flat ground in thick wet grass, but it should be OK.

Like I said above, but add in any hills at all, and it's gonna be underpowered a bit. You can't accuratelycompare what your Toro will do to what the 910 will do unless everything is identical weight, deck design, blades, pumps etc.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darryl G

I can also tell by looking back to see how they're hanging and often reach back and feel them to see how firm they are.

I have a 2010 Z920 54" with a mulch kit on it. ( not a MOD, just a fulltime kit). 26 HP with no issues mulching fescue in any condition. Bermuda I always cut in the afternoon when dry and it handles it fine. Also have a mulch kit on a Hustler trimstar 48". Cuts great as well.

I have a 717A, 48" 7Iron deck, with a 19hp Kaw. I do no mulching, but do use a chute blocker for leaf work in the Fall. In normal cutting, I use standard OEM hi-lift blades.

99% of the time, the 19hp is enough power. Only when I have a long upward slope do I sense I need to pull back a bit on the sticks. All my cutting is cool weather, northern grasses. Sometimes in the Spring, the growth is heavy, and wet. But, I don't find the 19hp a problem, only a bit of a challenge from time to time.

However, having said that, I wonder if a 22hp engine would burn less fuel. I get about 6.5 service hours, out of the 8 gallon full tank of gasoline (1.2 gal/hr). I think this is high on fuel usage. My 15hp Kohler Command Pro, single cylinder, driving my w/b will burn about 0.65 gal/hr.

In general, I do not run hard. Only in a very few instances am I running more than 70% full speed, usually about 4mph. My properties are too rough to run faster. I know I cannot control my machine like I want at faster speeds. My body thanks me for running slower than full speed.