An Empirically Verifiable Scientific Method Driven Graphical Analog Model Using The Target System Of Analysis

The conditions required for gravitational acceleration to occur have been known for centuries....

"The condition under which a body is, literally, free to fall under the influence of the local gravitational field with no resistance to its acceleration."....

....and the progressive collapse of the building (starting with column 79 on the left)....

....that essentially happens all at once....

....is clearly inconsistent with what we empirically know of natural progressive structural failure (defined as a time consuming process of individual/sequential/simultaneous failures involving a number of related structural components).

It's a matter of empirical fact that, even if a giant laser beam were to suddenly vaporize all but the North Face of the building, resulting in the remaining exterior columns immediately beginning to buckle all at once, free fall still would not occur.

The strength of buckled columns, whether one or a thousand, whether one at a time or all at once (or any combination thereof) won't just go from 100% to 0% when they buckle, they'll go from 100% to 0% while they buckle and that takes time.

....absolutely cannot create the conditions required for gravitational acceleration to occur, it's literally impossible. Some force must be introduced to quickly remove all support from beneath the literally falling visible upper part of the building seen in the video....

It's a physical impossibility for the lower part of the asymmetrically damaged building (reportedly three core columns and nine perimeter columns) to have naturally progressively collapsed in any way that could result in the upper part of the building symmetrically descending straight down through itself (NIST probable collapse sequence starting with column 79 circled below) at anything near gravitational acceleration for any period of time....

....and there is absolutely no mode or combination of modes of natural progressive structural failure driven solely by gravity that can ever give rise to the conditions required (below) for free fall to have occurred at any point during it's descent....

The scenario (below) is an absolute physical impossibility....

There is simply no point during a natural progressive gravity driven collapse of a steel frame skyscraper like this where one could say....

"Hold it.... right there! That's the point where all the steel columns and structural components that were supporting the building just a moment ago (with an area greater than that of a football field) will undoubtedly be found to be behaving in a manner very much like air (below left). It will take very careful calculation to tell the fall times apart during this free fall period of the ongoing progressive structural failure (below right)"....

Not only is it improbable, it's impossible that the lower asymmetrically damaged part of the building could have naturally progressively collapsed in a way that resulted in the upper part of the building actually accelerating as it descended symmetrically straight down through itself, through the path of greatest resistance (below right), and that driven on solely by gravity, it actually continued to accelerate so nearly to gravitational acceleration (below left) as to require very careful calculation for any difference between the two to be detected....

For the 2.25 seconds (eight stories, approximately 105 feet) that we know the upper part of the building literally fell at gravitational acceleration it cannot have been using any of it's potential energy to crush the building contents, columns and other structural components beneath it and undergo free fall at the same time....

Some other force powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the upper part of the building as it descended must be introduced to explain the observed rate of descent during the 2.25 second period of gravitational acceleration.

For the 2.25 seconds that the building iliterally fell at gravitational acceleration, no other force powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the upper part of the building was seen to be introduced from outside the building, and no other force powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the upper part of the building is known to have existed inside the building as a normal function of it's infrastructure.

For a load supported by a column to descend at gravitational acceleration, all support must be quickly removed, there's absolutely no other way. It must be knocked out, pulled out, blown out, vaporized, etc.

Since no eight story tall boulders were seen rumbling through Manhatten that day that could have quickly knocked out all support....

....and no other force capable of quickly removing all support from beneath the upper part of the building existed in the building as a normal function of it's infrastructure (blue below)....

....it naturally follows that whatever the other force was that must be introduced to explain the observed 2.25 seconds of descent at gravitional acceleration, it must have been introduced some time, or over time, before the event, and unless someone can show how the other force that must be introduced either during or before the collapse of the building was introduced from outside the building, or that it was already existing inside the building as a normal function of it's infrastructure, the process of elimination really leaves only one possible explanation for the building's behaviour.

Some energetic material powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the upper part of the building during the 2.25 second period of gravitational acceleration must have been physically transported inside the building some time before the event, it had to be brought in.

The explosion model (below) is the only one....

....that can realistically match and empirically be expected to create the conditions (below) that we empirically know must have existed....

....beneath the literally falling visible upper part of the building (below) during its observed largely symmetrical descent at gravitational acceleration for approximately 105 feet in 2.25 seconds....

The undisputed (both the NIST and independent researchers alike agree) confirmed observation of a significant period of gravitational acceleration....

....means an explosion, or a number of explosions, must have occurred that was powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the upper part of the building (below right), either all at once or incrementally in advance of its descent, permitting it to descend at gravitational acceleration for the observed period and under the conditions required (below left) for free fall to occur....

Though the possible composition and placement of the explosives can be endleessly debated, the empirically verifiable fact that they were indeed composed and placed cannot.

The building was brought down by explosives.... that's just the way it is.

Too many people are hypnotised by the logical fallacy, "Too big to be a lie" argument.

There's proof a 757 didn't hit the pentagon and the official claim about the Pentagon on 911 being implausible, yet under "the too big to be a lie" mist too many people still refuse to show any rational thought about 911.

When you point out the Manhattan project involved many thousands of people yet was kept a secret for as long as it deemed necessary, or the fact that many thousands of people work on military projects that are kept secret for decades until the products in question are released they still refuse to consider that 911 was a false flag and didn't happen like the Elite say it did.

It's been standard propaganda practise for hundreds of years to deem anyone challenging the official line on things as being "Tin foil", "nutty" or "unpatriotic", etc, etc - People who claimed the Earth revolved around the Sun were once denounced as nutjobs and persecuted.

-----|0| None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. |0|-----

I am in no doubt that the atrocities were committed by your brown skinned middle eastern friends who can do no harm to anyone. That is not to suppose that i believe this because i have been told to believe it by western media but because i have more reasons to believe the series of events as a result of my own judgement than as a result of indoctrination. I am aware of the large scale work involved to wire a building to collapse. I have seen or heard of no evidence for this whatsoever and the suggestion that explosives were planted to cover up evidence only leaves more evidence of explosives to be discovered. Neither was the collapse of buildings essential for some kind of insurance fiddle. No insurers in their right mind would expect those buildings to be repaired. The whole issue of collapses serves no purpose whatsoever from both the 'official' side and the 'conspiracy' side.

Ever looked for a scary face hidden within patterned wallpaper? If you look hard enough, you will see them but it dosent mean to say that they are actually there.

I was bored and decided to update my signature but i couldnt think of anything to put, so i decided to just put Bollocks!

Mr Squirrel wrote:I am in no doubt that the atrocities were committed by your brown skinned middle eastern friends who can do no harm to anyone. That is not to suppose that i believe this because i have been told to believe it by western media but because i have more reasons to believe the series of events as a result of my own judgement than as a result of indoctrination. I am aware of the large scale work involved to wire a building to collapse. I have seen or heard of no evidence for this whatsoever and the suggestion that explosives were planted to cover up evidence only leaves more evidence of explosives to be discovered. Neither was the collapse of buildings essential for some kind of insurance fiddle. No insurers in their right mind would expect those buildings to be repaired. The whole issue of collapses serves no purpose whatsoever from both the 'official' side and the 'conspiracy' side.

Ever looked for a scary face hidden within patterned wallpaper? If you look hard enough, you will see them but it dosent mean to say that they are actually there.

Ok, lets leave aside the issue of how the towers and WTC7 collapsed for a moment and assume that they did collapse due to being hit by planes alone and WTC7 did collapse straight down with a perfectly timed leading central core collapse due to random damage and random fires from the debris from teh twin towers

And focus on who actually did 911? I'm curious as to where you got your information from as to conclude "it was brown skinned people wot done it" if it wasn't from the maisntream media or mainstream politicians? After all even we discount the controlled demolition claim 911 could still have been committed by people who weren't "brown skinned Muslamics"

And even if it was "brown skinned people wot done it and the three wtc buildings collapsed solely as a result of the two planes hitting the towers there's still the question of the Pentagon.

The official claim about a 757 hitting the pentagon and being egg sliced by the pentagons skeleton of vertical columns and ending up inside the building can be proven to be impossible. No 757 hit the pentagon. Not only is there no CCTV footage of it despite the pentagon being surrounded by dozens of cameras and garages and hotels in the vicinity also having CCTV ( quickly confiscated by the FBI ), there are also witnesses on video, including police that testify the plane that was in the vicinity flew in a different path to that as per the official claim and there's also witnesses to say it flew over the pentagon and away into the distance.

So while the issue of the pentagon does prove at least part of the official claim about 911 is an untruth it doesn't prove brown skinned people didn't do it, but it does prove they didn't fly a 757 into it.

So given all that I'd like to know how you've concluded it was brown skinned people without being told by the MSM/Politicans and with consideration of the Pentagon untruth.

-----|0| None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. |0|-----

Smeggy. This subject has been done to death several times over between us. I have better, more interesting and uplifting things to do with my time now than get involved in a broken record of a topic. Not that its not interesting, i just dont have the time i used to have and even if i did.. you are unlikely to agree with me and i am unlikely to agree with you.

I find this topic hugely interesting but discussing it here, i feel that i am constantly repeating myself and you are doing the same. If you want to know my opinions on the subject and you cannot remember them, dig up all the old threads and have a good old read. I really cannot be bothered to keep going over this tired old subject. If you see this as a 'kop out'.. then its a kop out - you win - well done - have a jaffa cake.

I was bored and decided to update my signature but i couldnt think of anything to put, so i decided to just put Bollocks!