Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on April 8th
2010. Newcomers, you should always look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com
web site. In there you will find hundreds and hundreds of talks Iíve
given over the past few years for download for free. You can also
bookmark the other official sites Iíve got listed there on that front page
because some times too many people go into the .com site at the same time and
it tends to make sticky downloads. Sometimes I canít even upload to the
.com; they donít increase my bandwidth although they are supposed to, my disk
space. So you can always have an alternate site to go to if you bookmark
those sites. [Official sites listed above.] Remember that you are
the audience that brings me to you every night. Very few hosts have tried
it this way before. The ones in the past have always gone under because
the public donít support them. They will pay money to get into archives
and different things from other sites, especially the ones that fascinate them,
with people with alligator shoes or UFOs and stuff like that and MIX FACT AND
FICTION in with what they call the Patriot Movement. So those are
very, very important sites, very fascinating indeed. People like to get
fascinated more than they like to get educated and that is their choice, of
course. Those that try to go my way generally go under. The ads
that you hear on this show go straight to RBN from the advertisers; they bypass
me completely. That pays RBN to broadcast the show. It pays for
their board ops, their bills, and all the other things that they have to do,
and the transmission itself. So YOU have to support me by looking into my
web sites, buy my books; they are different from anyone elseís, I guarantee you
that. I donít write them in the linear fashion, textbook style youíve
been brainwashed to think that way and to reason that way even. The boys at the
top do not think in a linear fashion, thatís why they always beat you. So
go in and buy my books, buy the disks I have for sale or you can donate to me
and that will make me just tick over, hopefully, because Iíve got a lot of
expenses at this end as you can imagine. [Ordering and donations options
listed above.] For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, you
can get in touch with me at [address above].

Hopefully
I can last a little bit longer because, really, Iím up in the air whether I
should just keep going or just go off into the sunset and do other things which
will actually pay me and I certainly have other opportunities in many different
fields to do so. However, what we are going through right now is very,
very important and I try to at least share the knowledge that I have. Iím
grateful too, that at least Iíve woken up a lot of people into a much
bigger way of looking at the whole world, not just their little area or their
little countries and so on, and to show them that the international agendas that
have been going on since long before you were born. I'll be back with
more after this break.

This
is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Iíve mentioned for
years that the big boys work with an agenda always in mind. They do set
target dates for implementation of parts of the agenda and they never
change. They never alter the times and pick other dates. They never
deviate from their plans. You can count on them when they tell you whatís
going to happen. Itís not done through your government per se, itís done
through guys in government who belong to the Council on Foreign Relations
generally, from the Council on Foreign Relationís own web site.

Itís
interesting to me to see how during election times you are told very little
about politicians, who they actually are. You are told all you NEED to
know about them, as far as the big boys are concerned, or at least what you are
supposed to believe about them. Seldom do they ever tell you the
associations they belong to already, which part are they going to play, which
part is this left-winger going to play, which part is this right-winger going
to play, and all that nonsense because they all work for the same bosses, you
see. Itís the Hegelian dialectic and it always has been for an awful long
time. They use the left and right wing while nothing ever changes except
the agenda steamrolls ahead regardless of who pretends to be in power and we
pretend to believe them.

When
Tony Blair was in, for instance, I mean he was a nobody who was picked at
university and trained by people like Isaiah Berlin who put his name in to the
Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs
as a likely candidate because he was a yes-man. He would do whatever he
was told, I mean ANYTHING he was told, and as long as he was going to be well
rewarded, which he certainly has been since he left office. Thatís how
the world really works. He belonged to the Fabian Society. Iíve
gone over the history of the Fabian Society before, heavily funded by the
Milner Group that became the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council
on Foreign Relations, also by the Astor Foundation and other foundations to
manage what people though was going to be the left wing, the RADICAL left wing
in fact.

The
founding members were very, very much into the new type of socialism, at the
same time that they came into Nazi Germany in fact. In the movie, The
Soviet Story Ė excellent movie to see, a documentary, itís got so much in
it Ė to show you what itís all about. What it really did show you
is that what really Soviet and Fascist was one and the same thing. Thatís
why you had the Stalin-Hitler Pact because they had so much in common.
Even though one would shout later on Ďfascistí and another one would shout Ďcommunistí;
they had so much in common. It really is a totalitarian way of
controlling masses of people with a massive bureaucracy using a sort of
socialist/collectivist mentality over the masses to control them so that an
elite could rule them at the top. Both the Soviet system and the Nazi
system had big international corporations working with them from the very
beginning. In fact, they were really funded by them and the banks of the
Western world; BOTH of them were. They show you there what socialism really
is all about on behalf of the masters at the top, the very rich masters who
truly own it.

Part
of it was depopulation, especially beginning with what they declared were the
Ďunfití members of society. George Bernard Shaw in a very rare piece of footage,
Iím sure there is lots of footage of him but we never get access to it, as you
know, even though Iím sure the BBC has thousands and thousands of reels on
him. He spoke in behalf of the Fabians and he said that perhaps we should get the scientists to work on
a painless, humane gas that would kill off all the unfit in the country.
So you know where Hitler got his idea from. In fact, Hitler copied
everything that they said in the West in Europe and Britain. That was
part of their whole agenda.

Part
of it too, in the Fabian Society, was to bring in a world under ORDER, their
order, the natural intelligentsia with the money who obviously proved the
survival of the fittest and stayed at the top of the tree. Thatís how
they literally decide they ARE the best survivors. They are sticking
rich, theyíve kept a hold of it for generations, they dominate millions of
people, therefore they are the natural fit rulers. This cumbersome
nonsense of democracy is really a good sham to keep the people under control
while you go ahead with your Brave New World scenario.

Tony
Blair belonged to the Fabian Society, as does Mr Brown who presently is the
Prime Minister of Britain. They also belong to the Socialist
International, they call it. I donít know if itís the second or third or
fourth, they keep changing it. They push in these socialist policies on behalf
of the richest men on the planet. But Blair did say, and this was exposed
in the newspapers. Iíll try and find the link.

I
read it on the air about a month ago maybe, where Blair had said to his
right-hand man, my job here is to so alter
the face of Britain by MASSIVE immigration of the most diverse Ė diverse
meaning opposite Ė cultures that the
British way of life, the culture would be completely destroyed, it could
never get itself back together. That was part of his agenda and he really
opened the floodgates to immigration. You see the fallout of it today as
Mr Blair goes on and is so well rewarded. I think heís got £20 or £30
million given to him through various means for what he did as Prime
Minister. Thatís how they pay them off. The fallout hits the rest
of society, never mind about crime and all the rest of it. It
says hereÖ

Labour's betrayal of British workers: Nearly every one
of 1.67m jobs created since 1997 has gone to a foreigner

By James Chapman / dailymail.co.uk / 8th April 2010

Immigration was at
the centre of the election campaign today (Alan: Of course the
conservatives will hype that up and change nothing.) as it emerged
that virtually every extra job created under Labour has gone to a foreign
worker. (A: Priority hiring, you see.)

Figures suggested an
extraordinary 98.5 per cent of 1.67million new posts were taken by immigrants.

The Tories (A:
the Conservatives) seized on the revelation as evidence that the Government
has totally failed to deliver its pledge of 'British jobs for British
workers'. (A: Ah, but itís not really that. Youíve got to
understand that they are also bringing in their extended families from these
diverse cultures. In fact, in the United States and Canada and Britain
people from those, what they call, diverse cultures that still have extended
families, they can bring them all in. But if you go to any other country, even
from Britain to Canada, you canít bring all YOUR family in, unless you belong
to one of these diverse cultures. Then that hits the health care system
too. In fact some of them, itís been in the papers here, go right on;
some of the elderly ones go right into nursing homes. They havenít paid a
penny into any of this and it gets people very irate.)

As Gordon Brown
tried to fight on the economy and cleaning up politics, he was confronted in
the Commons about how British people of working age have lost out.

Mr Green said the
Tories would reduce net migration to tens of thousands a year from the peaks
of 200,000 under Labour by enforcing an annual cap.

(A: Of
course, they are not going to change itÖ ) Mr Brown rejected the idea
of an immigration quota (A: reduction), which he said would do
'great damage to British business'.

Really,
the real thing behind it, of this mush society of diverse cultures where
literally you go through a period of massive chaos and fallout and violence
between different groups until it settles down. This is what they decided
back in, I think itís 1917 or so, in the Fabian Society. It reminds me of
what Mr Rockefeller said at one of his meetings when he was talking about the
similar thing to the United States and the rest of the world. He said,
well, you canít make an omelet without
breaking eggs. So the fallout for maybe 50 years, or mayhem and
all this kind of stuff, thatís all it is, itís just an omelet getting put
together and this is tough luck, you see. Thatís ACCEPTABLE.
All that fallout is acceptable. They are not suffering at the top, of
course. They donít even mix with any of the ordinary people of ANY class
or ANY ethnic group. They donít mix with it, so they can watch the eggs
cracking all around them I guess. So thatís the world you live in because
we live through a big agenda, big world plan.

Whatís
interesting too, everyone is going on right nowÖ Itís interesting how feeds get
put out to the internet. They have names for this because the government
itself has specialized teams and cyber warfare experts and so on putting out
stuff and watching it run around the internet in circles. Sure enough,
everybody goes along with it like a big wave and prattle on about it. So
we are GIVEN the things to prattle on about and complain about, to be honest
with you. Thatís why I tend to go into the actual CFR meetings, the big
foundationsí meetings, the big NGO meetings and their own web sites and show
you whatís really going on most of the time. When you read the media,
believe you me, itís put out there for you regardless of what they are
saying.

What
so many are on about now was an article put out, a statement put out by Moodyís
where Moodyís had mentioned that the US and Britain especially, better start
really working hard to manage their books and put in all the unpopular mandates
theyíll have to put in to save the economy, meaning the banking system.
ĎUnpopularí means through massive taxation because how else are they going to
get anything; itís always through tax. Governments do nothing but tax,
you see; thatís what they do. And spend your tax money, generally not on
you. What they were also saying, it might disturb social cohesion.
What that means, in their parlance, is the same terminology used in the
military departmentsí exposťs they put out too for the Department of Defence
which Iíve read on the air - 90 pages - and one from the United States
too, that there could be riots starting if they donít mandate these
unpopular policies and make us all poor. I'll be back with more after
this break.

This
is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just discussing about the
waves that are sent around all media and the internet and everyone prattles
about them on cue, as we are supposed to do. One of them was Moodyís of
course making the statements that social cohesion could be put in jeopardy and
that the US and Britain might end up with riots similar to Greece and Spain and
so on. There is an article out on that too.

No room for error on U.S. debt

By Colin Barr, senior writer - cnn.com / March 16,
2010

(A: Theyíre
talking about cutting back on spending and if itís done too soon that weíd risk
a double-dip recession and all that kind of stuff. Itís all managed
perfectly at the top, believe you me. Which ever way that they go is what
they want and the outcome too will be what they want. They do say it will
test social cohesion, which means there will be riots and so on. It saysÖ)

Nor can big
developed countries expect to export their way to health on the back of booms
in emerging markets such as India and China. (A: Of course not, thatís
why they set up India and China.)

China
didnít drag itself up to be the main manufacturer of the
planet. The Western powers that OWN the Western countries,
through the governments which they own as well, got the GATT going, the General
Agreement of Trade and Tariffs, and agreed to send everything offshore and
encourage all the factories to move offshore to China. Actually they used
the taxpayersí money to do so to get them across to China and to set up the new
factories in China. YOU funded all that, all you unemployed folk out
there in the West, and your governments were responsible on behalf of their
masters. You were also responsible for paying for any losses incurred
during the first 10 years of operating business. Did your major media
bother telling you about that? No, of course not. Well they set up
China too and India and believe you me, and there is to be nothing to replace
it back home. This is a service economy, discussed as far back as the 70s
that thatís what they had planned for the US, Great Britain and a few other
countries, service economies. So Iíll put these articles up on my web
sites at the end of the show if XplorNet, which I pay a lot of money to get
uploading through their satellite system, gives me more than double dial-up
speed.

Another
good editorial is from the Washington Post. Itís a bit more satisfactory
than the last one. It saysÖ

EDITORIAL: Global warming's unscientific method

THE WASHINGTON TIMES / Wednesday, April 7, 2010

The prophets of
global warming continue to lament as their carefully crafted yarn
unravels before their eyes. Ross McKitrick, an intrepid economics professor
from the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada, has tugged apart the thin
mathematical threads that once held together the story of climate change.

Recent attempts to
silence Mr. McKitrick illuminate the extent to which the alarmists have abandoned
proper scientific method in their pursuit of political goals.(A:
Now, they havenít abandoned a darn thing folks. If you notice the laws
are getting passed, and theyíve been passed, that you are going to be taxed
into the grave for carbon taxes and on your vehicles and all the rest of it and
all the energy. This is all the same scenario under the guise of saving the
world from freezing or heating, you see, which ever way it goesÖ which has gone
on for millions of years.)

Mr. McKitrick has
spent the past two years attempting to publish a scientific paper(A:
I told you over the last few nights that if you think that science is somehow
impartial to politics, forget it. Science, really, is under the dictate
of politics. Itís always used by politics, ALWAYS. And if you donít
go along with them you are frozen right out, as weíve already noticed by
different articles that have emerged for what the IPCC has done to different
scientists, some of whom are on their boards, and they said that this is hogwash, it doesnít stand up to
scientific investigation. Well, they were completely ostracized
and the big magazines were told not to publish any of their works. This
is what goes on. This is ALL politics. Everything is politics.) that
documents a fundamental error in the 2007 United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report. This U.N. document
serves as the sole authority upon which the Environmental Protection Agency
based its December "endangerment finding" that will allow unelected
bureaucrats to impose cap-and-trade-style regulations without a vote of
Congress. The cost to the public in higher gas and energy prices will
run in the billions. (A: Itís going to run you off the road
actually, thatís part of the intention of it.)

One might think that
the scientific community would be extra diligent in double-checking the
conclusions of a report carrying such weighty real-world consequences. In fact,
the opposite happened. Seven scientific journals circled the wagons to block
publication of Mr. McKitrick's explosive findings. (A: Heís a
professor, this guy.)

The IPCC report
argued that temperatures rose one degree Celsius over the course of a century
as a direct result of man-made carbon-dioxide emissions. This tiny change in
temperature was calculated through the use of an "adjusted" set of
global surface-temperature readings. (A: Special computers
designed for the purpose.) Mr. McKitrick found that factors unrelated
to global climate contaminated this data set, resulting in a higher temperature
reading. (A: Lots of exposťs have been done on their bogus
readings.) He showed a statistically significant correlation between
the change in temperature readings and socioeconomic indicators. It makes
sense, for example, that replacing trees and forests with concrete and glass
skyscrapers might contribute to the .01 degree annual increase in local
temperature readings. This "urban heat island" effect would not be
present in readings taken outside the asphalt jungle. (A: They
are taking all the readings from the middle of the concrete jungles,
folks. I'll be back with more after this break.)

This
is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Iíve read articles
from people, in some countries that are more socialized than others,
complaining about the US and so on and saying, well,
you know, itís much better where we are because weíve got the socialized health
care and all that. Well, listen, if government wants to give you a
system that works, you will have it. However, if they want to take it
down, which they will, believe you me, once youíre all pacified and dependent,
they will do that too because the World Health Organization is ultimately in
charge of all the health care systems and their policies, as it is with
everything else and every other policy to do with health or housing or anything
else. They want the most MINIMAL care to be available across the world
and anything above minimal care will depend on your necessity to your community,
your SOCIAL STANDING. So enjoy it while youíve got it because it
wonít lastÖ as they hammer away at the US and everywhere else.

The
countries that still have bits of it like Canada and Britain are in a mess
already because they were designed to go down eventually. I know guys who
worked in the system back in the 1970s in Canada at top levels who were told at
meetings, that come around the late 80s
and through the 90s they would start drumming the beat for Ďcrisis in health
careí. Thatís all weíve heard as they were slashing back, slashing
back, starting on mandates with the rural hospitals which were very good
hospitals. They were all paid by the people in the areas through their
taxes. It was done through Bob Rae in Canada and other ones in the United
States and other ones across Canada too, other local Prime Ministers, I call
them, the provincial ones.

The
idea was, under the Agenda 21 plan coming up, weíd all be living in
habitat corridors along side the major highways which are just being finished
now. Thatís where everyone is to get crowded into and into the major
cities that are all interlinked together. Youíve got to read the real
reports, itís the only way youíll make sense of anything happening and you
might start initially saying, isnít that
a coincidence; I read that in that report 2 years ago, 5 years ago, 10 years
ago and here it is happening. Eventually, youíll catch on
folks. You will catch on; your world in the future is planned that
way. Hopefully, if you canít catch on, then please donít email me.

Here
is an article about the US and the way itís going. Again, from the
Washington Times.

EDITORIAL: Close enough for government work

THE WASHINGTON TIMES / Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Part of President
Obama's health care bill (A: Itís not his, you know that.
Hillary Clinton was talking about that and they were working on it while she
was up there.) depends on the government telling doctors and hospitals what
are purportedly the most efficient medical procedures they should use. (A:
So you see, there are bureaucrats now telling the doctors what procedures they
should use. The RAND Corporation was employed to find how to cut costs
and all directions.) Americans are supposed to trust Mr. Obama's
bureaucrats over their own doctors. (A: See, your doctors will
become, as they do, government agents under a federal health care system.
Youíve got to understand that.) Meanwhile, a new report from the
Government Accountability Office shows that the Obama administration has been
an utter failure at identifying the efficiency of a wide range of products.
As government encroaches on more aspects of American life, the federal
bureaucracy is increasingly incompetent. (A: Öas it expands, because
it is really expanding.)

The Environmental
Protection Agency and the Department of Energy are charged with identifying how
energy-efficient different products are. They claim that 98 percent of the
products they test meet or exceed Energy Star requirements, which are
government benchmarks used to regulate greater efficiency. Yet a sting by GAO
investigators showed that the government agencies incorrectly identified as
"efficient" 15 of 20 bogus products submitted by GAO for testing. No
action was taken on two of the 20 products. Overall, the government made the
correct decision on 11 percent of the test products.

Actually,
Iíve got another article here; Iíll try and find it. Itís very important;
it ties in with this because I donít know if you know that recently the big
pharma made a deal with the United States government to substitute different
ingredients in their pharmaceutical products. The mainstream I donít
think mentioned it but I have the articles here from the corporations involved
and from the US government. Itís to make them cheaper and cheaper, you
see, and they will obviously lose their efficacy as you put in substitute
ingredients. Youíll be paying the same amount of money for them, they
will still be called the same products, there will also be different side effects
with them which will become apparent over a while as they deny it, mind
you. What was interesting too, was because of the hullabaloo about
thimerosal, or mercury in the vaccine shots and the public wisening up to it,
they have agreed that pharma will no longer have to label that on any of their
inoculations. And, by the way, Iím not kidding you, Iíll try and find
this, it said, they can also up the quantity of thimerosal up to 3-4 times the
present allowable standard. Just to let you know. Just to let you
know about that. Thatís for your new health care system, you see.
Everything is for a political agenda and depopulation certainly is a political
agenda. So thatís that article there, as the doctors become government
agents as the bureaucrats run the doctorsí lives.

Believe
you me, they are politicized too. They will do what they are told; all
professions, psychiatry especially since they have been a tool all down the years for regimes. They lock away
people with conflicting opinions. Here is a part here from a very good
book, for those whoíve got a brain to follow because believe you me, itís not
easy reading. Youíve got to really go through a blow by blow, what I did,
what they said, what I did then, what they said account of one manís taking on
the Soviet regime in the Soviet Union, when it was the Soviet Union, when they
locked away people who had different opinions than the authorized ones.
Itís called A Question of Madness: Repression by Psychiatry in the
Soviet Union by Zhores A Medvedev and Roy A Medvedev, his brother.
His brother fought like crazy going through ALL the different bureaucratic
levels, being given the runaround and so on because they locked up his
brother. Why? Because he came out with articles on the genes of
plants and biology and so on which differed from a HERO, a Soviet hero
scientist. His ideas, which are all wonkey actually, but Stalin loved
him, Lisinkov I think it was. His crazy ideas were told this is now the
authorized mandate and belief system of this particular area of science.

Well,
itís no different than the IPCC who have done the same blocking of professors
who will not go along with their political agenda and it is a political
agenda. Everything at the United Nations IS a political agenda.
Thatís what the United Nations is all about, politics, world politics.
They lock you up if you go against them. Theyíve done the same thing to a
LOT of professors. They canít even get their works published HERE in the
West if they go against the IPCC because this whole New World Order taxation,
we serve the planet idea, we serve the system and they will give us high
priests to serve, believe you me, who live very well. Itís all BASED on
this bogus carbon and nonsense like that.

Back
to this book, on page 194 it saysÖ

Totalitarian
centralization of the medical service, (A: This happened in the
1960s.) while introducing the progressive principle of free health care for
all, has also made it possible to use medicine as a means of government
control and political regulation. Medical dossiers in clinics and
hospitals are available to government officials and a growing number of
institutions and agencies asked for reports for a personís state of health,
with details of his past medical history and symptoms. Psychiatrists are
playing an increasingly important role in all this and they may secretly veto a
young personís entry to an academic institution or a trip abroad, even only as
a tourist, or pronounce his suitability or unsuitability for many categories of
employment.

He
goes on to say basically, that once again, doctors become agents of the
government. What a story this guy has got to tell here of how they just
get you for going against what the AUTHORIZED scientific opinion is and he
certainly suffered. They can just lock you upÖ and claim whatever they
wish to claim to keep you in prison, which is psychiatry, a psychiatric prison
basically. Thatís when doctors become pawns and servants of the
government and everything becomes very inefficient. So those with a brain
who can reallyÖ and I mean that too, a lot of folk today have no attention span
whatsoever. They are bored. They get bored with everything. If
there are not enough flashing scenes in a movie, with chases and cars blowing
up and every scene lasts 3 seconds maximum, they canít follow it. Theyíve been
like that since they watched their first cartoons that were designed for the
same purposeÖ to lower your attention span. But they cannot read.
They canít read. Thatís the trade-off for having what they claim is
supposedly fun.

Because
of all the new system, where we are to serve the planet, remember the Royal
Institute of International Affairs in its own mandates, when it was set up, its
tenets set up that they would bring in a world of SERVICE. Servitude
to the world state, S-E-R-V-I-T-U-D-E, SERVITUDEÖ thatís from the same term,
word, as SERF, remember, because this is a new FEUDAL system. I hope
people can put this together. Thatís what Professor Carroll Quigley said,
who the official historian for them was. They are bringing in a world of
service as the new feudal system where CEOs, corporate leaders, will be the new
OVERLORDS over the general public. But the duty of the general public
will be to SERVE the world state, SERVICE to the world state. Thatís what
all this global warming nonsense and taxation of you into the ground, put you
into little habitat areas, grading you according to your necessity to the
community in communitarianism is all about. And the mainstream media
wonít tell you but you can go into the main web sites, if you want to do your
own searches into their own histories. They put it up for you if youíve
got the head to go through it. Itís very boring stuff but Iíll tell you,
you wonít have to guess about anything ever again.

Here
is an article from The Times Online.

Ten important tax changes happening in April 2010

Timesbusiness.typepad.com - Money Central /
April 1, 2010

Alistair Darling (A:
This is the guy in charge of the taxations in Britain.) had already
announced a massive £20 billion tax raid before last Wednesdayís Budget, mainly
targeted at high earners. (A: This is a con; they always tell you
that. Thatís what they always start the story off with, okay, the rich are going to get socked but as Elton John
said back in the 70s, yeah, they always
do that for us boys, but they are always write in another loop hole; we never,
ever have to pay taxes for that. He was very honest about
it. But they always start off their articles in that way, to put you off
guard as you read the rest of the story.) Here we remind you of the
key measures that will be coming into effect from April 6.

1. Showroom tax
The Government announced taxes for high-polluting cars back in 2008, but these
finally kicked in on April Vehicle tax rates for cars registered on or after
March 1, 2001 are split into 13 bands (A: Thatís for the US to copy,
you see, which they are starting to copy now. They grade youÖ) (A to
M) depending on CO2 emissions. The amount you will pay depends on the band your
car comes under. (A: The grade.)

The most polluting
newly-bought cars in band M, such as the Lexus LS 460 A8, will incur a charge
of up to £950 for the first year and £435 thereafter. (A: These are
punishment taxes.) New cars in band L, such as the Vauxhall Zafira
2.0i 16V Turbo 200PS M6, will incur a £750 first year rate and £425 thereafter.
However, cars in bands A will pay no vehicle tax at all. (A: Now
you already pay a road tax which comes under that so you will be paying.
These guys give you nothing for free. They never give you anything for
nothing.)

2. Fuel duty

The Chancellor had
planned a 3p (A: percent) rise in fuel duty on April 1. However,
this increase has now been staggered to 1p in April, 1p in October and 1p in
January. (A: This is to be done in 2 increases so it will put
you offÖ itís not so bad with each increase. We accept a few pennies at a
time, thatís what they say at the top. Itís when they give you umpteen
pounds at one time that you start getting shocked. So they stage it in 2
increases, they stagger it.)

3. Income tax bands

Tax allowances will
be frozen for the tax year 2010-11, instead of rising with inflation, (A:
Thatís because they are taxing all the things that you buy, your energy and everything.)
while the higher rate tax threshold will be frozen at £43,875 until 2013.
If it increased by the current 3 per cent rate of inflation it would rise to
£44,995.

ďThis means
taxpayers will pay an additional £489 in tax (A: Thatís in straight
tax; thatís not on all your purchases.) and 75,000 more will pay the
higher-rate tax for the first time,Ē (A: Which of course they
wonít.) Mike Warburton, of Grant Thornton, (A: Grant
Thornton, sounds very official, GRANT THORNTONÖ) the accountant, says. Similarly
the tax-free personal allowance will stay at £6,475 instead of rising to
£6,669, meaning every taxpayer will pay an extra £40. (A: [Alan
laughing.] But they go on about all this stuff that nobody really bothers
reading because itís hullabaloo and so on, except you are going to get
stiffed. You are going to get stiffed folks. Thatís what itís going
to be.† They also talk about pensions,
interesting how they word this.)

Ö5. Qualifying for a
state pension

The good news(A: Hereís the good newsÖ) is that men and women will need to work
for only 30 yearsto qualify for the full basic state pension. (A:
Oh, isnít that nice.) Currently, women need 39 qualifying years of
national insurance contributions and men need 44 years.

The bad news is that
the womenís state pension age will gradually rise from 60 to 65 between 2010
and 2020, bringing it in line with menís. [Alan laughing.] Then
from 2024 both the menís and womenís state pension age will rise from 65 to
reach 68 by 2046. (A: So you have to be 68Ö you might just make
it before you croak and get a penny back for all that money you paid in.
See, the government really needs that money now that weíre in trouble you know,
and weíre fighting all the carbon dioxide and stuff, and youíve got to get
something for the big boys to trade these bags of nothing between each other
for trillions of dollars through the Rothschildís bank in Switzerland, and Mr
Al Goreís outfit and so on. Oh, God.)

Itís
just astonishing, but itís the same old stuff. Iíve seen this my whole
life long, as youíre shafted and shafted and shafted and the public, the
people, they still think theyíre free. Theyíre living in a police state
but they think theyíre free. [Alan laughing.]

Iíve
mentioned before how the big institutions that run the world, the parallel
government as Quigley called them, the REAL government, who are not answerable
to the public but they tell governments what to do and they even put their own
men in governments and bureaucracy across the world. From the Council on
Foreign Relations own web site,

Harnessing International Institutions to Address
Climate Change

cfr.org / Release Date: March 2010

(A:
Thatís education, everything, to go on boardÖ they call this consensus
building. Meaning, if you want to be part of the system and not be
defamed and get cash coming your way, youíd better go along with this.
Thatís what it means. There is the music coming in, I'll be back with
more on this after this break. )

This
is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Remember, Iíll put
these links up on my web site at then end of the show, with the blessings of
XplorNet satellite upload, if they dare to give me a wee bit of speed to put it
up there.

Iím
going to put this link up too, to the Council on Foreign Relations, the
parallel government, the guys whoíve got think tanks working on everything,
this CHARITABLE organization that runs the world on behalf of the bankers who
own them. In fact thatís what does own them; it was comprised primarily
at the top of bankers from the old Milner Group, international boys of course,
international bankersÖ not just local bankers but international boys.
They run the world and they decide where itís going and here they are, with
their ideas of how to bring ALL international institutions in together on
climate change to be politically correct and go along with the one agenda; just
like the Soviet Union. All science must go along with it if you want to
pass your examinations and be a scientist and get paid, etc, etc. Thatís
how itís done. There is a PDF of their technique from their own web site
on how they are going about doing that. They cover every single area,
every institution folksÖ all education, every single thing.

Interesting
too is this article here, itís from Truthout.org. Itís an article about
the troops in Iraq. The title isÖ

Iraq War Vet: "We Were Told to Just Shoot People,
and the Officers Would Take Care of Us"

Wednesday 7 April 2010 / truthout.org / by: Dahr
Jamail

On Monday, April 5,
Wikileaks.org posted video footage from Iraq, taken from a US military Apache
helicopter in July 2007 as soldiers aboard it killed 12 people and wounded two
children. The dead included two employees of the Reuters news agency:
photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen and driver Saeed Chmagh.

The US military
confirmed the authenticity of the video.

The footage clearly
shows an unprovoked slaughter, (A: Itís only one of many
slaughters. Thatís what they do over there.) and is shocking to watch
whilst listening to the casual conversation of the soldiers in the
background. (A: These soldiers talk just as if they were talking
to each other sitting playing on the couch there with their little video
games. Thatís how they are talking folks.)

As disturbing as the
video is, this type of behavior by US soldiers in Iraq is not uncommon. (A:
It is THE common thing. You canít be a man unless you show that nothing
bothers you. huh, huh, I just blew
his head off, huh, huh. Thatís how they talk.)

Truthout has spoken
with several soldiers who shared equally horrific stories of the slaughtering
of innocent Iraqis by US occupation forces.

"I remember one
woman walking by," said Jason Washburn, a corporal in the US Marines who
served three tours in Iraq. He told the audience at the Winter Soldier hearings
that took place March 13-16, 2008, in Silver Spring, Maryland, "She was
carrying a huge bag, and she looked like she was heading toward us, so we lit
her up(A: Thatís what they call it.) with the Mark 19, which is
an automatic grenade launcher, and when the dust settled, we realized that the
bag was full of groceries. She had been trying to bring us food and we blew her
to pieces."

Well,
there ya go and you know what the rest of it is like because thatís what
soldiers are all about folks, in reality. Thatís what you go into the
military to BE, a man, to be a
man, you know, to look at all the nasty stuff and the gruesome stuff and you
laugh at it, ha, ha, just like
that and if you donít the rest of them will rib you on it and call you
names. You have obedience to authority, you see. Obedience to
authority, that means you are brainwashed into obeying authority and you will
do WHATEVER YOU ARE TOLD. Experiments have proved this; you will do whatever
you are told as long as a superior person, an officer in authority tells you to
do so. They will shoulder it for
youÖ and you can have no conscience about it AT ALL, just go and playÖ
Johnnyís got his gun.

Anyway,
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or
your Gods GO with you.