Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir

versión On-line ISSN 2413-3051versión impresa ISSN 1021-447X

J. energy South. Afr. vol.23 no.4 Cape Town 2012

Projecting the external health costs of a coal-fired power plant: The case of Kusile

Johannes W Riekert; Steven F Koch

Department of Economics, University of Pretoria

ABSTRACT

We examine an important subset of the expected health costs associated with the commissioning of Kusile, a new coal-fired electricity generation plant in South Africa. The subset of health impacts focuses on sulphur dioxides, nitrous oxides and large particulate matter (greater than 10 mm). The analysis makes use of the Impact Pathway Approach combined with the data transfer methodology. The plant, which is expected to contribute 4 800 MW of additional electricity to the South African grid is found to have modest health impacts, partly due to the limited additional pollutant emissions expected at the plant. Specifically, additional localised external health costs are found to be in the region of 0.09c/kWh to 6.08c/kWh. Limitations of the analysis are also examined.

Keywords: Impact Pathway Approach, health cost externalities, Kusile

Full text available only in PDF format.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge funding from Greenpeace, although the views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the funding body. The authors would also like to acknowledge comments from James N. Blignaut, Roula Inglesi-Lotz, Nono Nkambule, Kuku Voyi, Jane Olwoch, Melita Steele, Nina Schultz, Rianne Teule, Fiona Musana, and participants at the external costs of coal workshop. All remaining errors are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Inglesi-Lotz, R. and Blignaut, J. (201s). Estimating the opportunity cost of water for the Kusile and Medupi coal-fired electricity power plants in South Africa. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 23(4): 76-84. [ Links ]

Maddison, D. (1999). The plausibility of the ExternE estimates of the external effects of electricity production. CSERGE Working Paper GEC 99-04. London: University College London and University of East Anglia. [ Links ]