What he’s suggesting may come as a shock to the citizens of Canada’s largest cities, who can’t imagine a tripling of the population as they sit stuck in traffic, or endure crowded commutes between home and work.

“Much of Toronto is dangerously under-populated with only single-family houses”, Saunders says.

“Our largest cities are stuck at a point where they’ve become too large for their existing infrastructure, their existing collections of equipment” he explains.

The solution for these cities, according to Saunders: “They need to snap up to another larger level at maybe twice their population in order to have the sustainable systems that can support the people.”

Saunders begins the book by illuminating how our history and tradition left us in this situation. He describes Canada’s evolution as having been under the “minimising impulse”.

“Between about the end of the War of 1812, and the end of the Second World War, Canada pursued a set of policies designed to limit its scope, to limit its economic role, to limit its diversity, to close the border with the United States to trade, so that it would be a country that existed to provide raw materials to Britain and other remote places.” Saunders said, in an interview last week.

It may come as a surprise to many Canadians to know that in the first hundred years of our history, almost as many immigrants left Canada, as came to Canada.

He says it’s now time to welcome and settle people and to encourage population growth.

“It’s not all about immigration”

“Our consumer markets are too small to have independent Canadian companies that can stay viable and compete, our taxpayer base is too small to support the sorts of government services and so on that we need at a scale we have come to expect, and most importantly, we do not have the population density to make a transition to a carbon-neutral economy, Saunders says.

“We live in a very ecologically unsustainable way because of the low population density across Canada and especially in its largest cities, and we need to build up concentrations of people both for economic reasons, for ecological reasons, and also for cultural reasons.”

Beyond our largest urban centres, Saunders says its the mid-size cities across Canada that have the most to gain, particularly those with universities and community colleges.

“Those are the places where immigrants want to settle now. Those are the places that should become the hubs of knowledge and entrepreneurship and invention in Canada.”

“We don’t have very good family policies.”

He says these cities should begin to envision themselves as becoming major cities, with high-speed links to the larger centres.

“It’s not all about immigration” Saunders says. “A large part of Canada’s population deficit is a result of the fact that we don’t have very good family policies.”

And we have a fertility gap, that’s the difference between the amount of children young couples would like to have, and the size of the family they eventually do have.

Saunders says seven out of ten Canadians say they found they could not afford to have that extra child.

“I think it’s important, to recognize in the future, that we need to include existing Canadian families in any population plan, partly because it’s the right thing to do because we do make it very difficult for people to have families of the size they want, but also because it makes it politically more viable, rather than seeing immigrants as competitors for resources and that sort of thing, established Canadian families see themselves as being co-participants in a shared project.”

While Canada, like many other western countries, is living through a demographic shift to a significantly older population, the federal government has boosted immigration quotas by 50,000 to 300.000 new arrivals annually.

According to Doug Saunders, that’s getting close to the target. And in the meantime we can continue developing more progressive family policies.

More stories

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.

Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.

RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.

Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.

In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.

Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.

Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.

Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.

Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.

Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.

Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.

Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.

Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.

All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.

Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.

Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.

By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.

Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Name*

Email*

Website

Current ye@r *

Leave this field empty

One comment on “‘Maximum Canada: Why 35 Million Canadians Are Not Enough’”

Canadians need to start recognizing that nutcases like this guy are in our government and using their power there to try and balloon the population in unsustainable ways causing irreversible damage for their own short term monetary gain through their investments in the multinational/financial institutions that benefit from all growth, be it good or bad for the country itself.

The arguments are weak and transparent, as are the concessions made to the usual response to this nation-destroying tripe; “Canadians are getting angry that we are trying to replace them, so if we help them have big families too they will be more complacent.”

Perhaps the most offensive claim from this charlatan is that higher population density and more, larger cities will somehow be good for the environment. Canada is one of the few vast reserves of untouched forest and freshwater left on Earth, and we have a moral duty to all humanity to see it stays that way. When even the most remote of manitoba’s lakes is brown with sewage and the mountains stripped bare of timber to meet housing needs I don’t think the ecosystem will care that we’re more than compensating for the damage in carbon credits paid to the government.