HONORABRE CHAIRMAN wrote:This is like giving a dollar to a hobo.He's going to keep coming back for more. For the rest of your life.

JUST BUY YOUR FUCKING BOOZE AND LEAVE SIR

LOL. And HONORABLE CHAIRMAN. He's giving me 5 bucks. Very valuable information. Anyway, thanks for the info!Oh and one more question. What was the effect in your montage when the corners of the video popped out?

I don't know it. He never fully explained it to me. He got it from a program he wrote in java. He actually studies at MIT. Its possible. I bet if we ran the tests again it would be closer to 80.7-8% chance of OHKO without modification.

HONORABRE CHAIRMAN wrote:Without.With a Piston A 50%, it bumps up the chances to 98.4-98.6%

What about piston C?

Slightly less. If I'm correct, it was about 95.34-95.45(repeating). And piston B was 96.9-97.13Both are 50% models. The system was drop about .13% off for every 10%. So a 30% piston C would be .26% less likely.

HONORABRE CHAIRMAN wrote:Without.With a Piston A 50%, it bumps up the chances to 98.4-98.6%

What about piston C?

Slightly less. If I'm correct, it was about 95.34-95.45(repeating). And piston B was 96.9-97.13Both are 50% models. The system was drop about .13% off for every 10%. So a 30% piston C would be .26% less likely.

The numbers don't lie. Are you going to listen to "someone" or a player that attends MIT's graduate program in computer science and mathematical analytics and is one of the best players this game has ever known, and has a hell of a lot more experience than your 12 your old ass?

HONORABRE CHAIRMAN wrote:Without.With a Piston A 50%, it bumps up the chances to 98.4-98.6%

What about piston C?

Slightly less. If I'm correct, it was about 95.34-95.45(repeating). And piston B was 96.9-97.13Both are 50% models. The system was drop about .13% off for every 10%. So a 30% piston C would be .26% less likely.