On Fri, 30 May 2003 17:54:21 -0400
Travis Crump <pretzalz@techhouse.org> wrote:
>Chris Metzler wrote:
>> .. . .which are not depended on by anything in testing. I don't know
>> why libparted1.4 and libparted1.6 are both in testing right now,
>> because libparted1.4 looks like it isn't used by anything in testing,
>> and actually conflicts with the version of parted that's currently
>> in testing. Maybe someone else can explain that. But in the
>> meantime, I would think that it should be safe to remove it, which I
>> guess was what you tried to do next:
>
> It's not in testing:
Ah, thanks. I'd checked the packages search webpage, which is still
showing it in there (as of 1821 EDT anyway):
http://tinyurl.com/d374
It must not have updated yet for some reason. If its removal/replacement
was recent, I wonder if the OP got caught by updating the package cache
in the middle of the change or something like that.
Thanks for the heads-up.
-c
--
Chris Metzler cmetzler@speakeasy.snip-me.net
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear