-TV shows -Including sitcoms, sports broadcasts, news broadcasts, comedy shows, cartoons, dramas, etc. -Includes network and cable TV, pay-per-view and on-demand TV -Music videos, such as the ones you might find on music video channels -Videos of live concerts, even if you captured the video yourself Even if you took the video yourself, the performer controls the right to use his/her image in a video, the songwriter owns the rights to the song being performed, and sometimes the venue prohibits filming without permission, so this video is likely to infringe somebody else's rights. -Movies and movie trailers -Commercials -Slide shows that include photos or images owned by somebody else

How a personal video made with a personal camera in a public place falls into that definition is beyond me. It doesn't matter. They'll never stop it.

9 comments:

There you go with wild speculation.How do you know the ASWSU had anything to do with it? You don't. The ASWSU president already said it was not the case in the evergreen, which of course you read yet you still blame them with no proof or even reasonable speculation.

More likely one of the profs contacted youtube and claimed it was copywritten material. Do I know this for a fact? No but much more reasonable explaination. Either way the video will return soon I am sure.

WSUcollegerepublican: Who filmed the video? I noticed two cameras at one point and when John Streavas asked about the video, the woman said she was with Cable 8. If it was Cable 8, the film belongs to the university. If that is the case, you can still access it because it belongs to a PUBLIC university, but only after taking the proper steps. If the film was entirely private with permission granted by the filmmaker, you probably have an even stronger defamation of character case.