It is not highly debatable regarding Pauline Hanson. She was jailed for fraud.

The Australia First movement jailed? What all of them? Please support your claim.

You jut get more wrong every time you type, you do know that, right?

She didn't commit fraud. She was pardoned. She was thrown in jail without proper procedure because she offended you leftards. Q2- Wikipedia and all of the other sources. look it up for yourself.

Crap. She and Ettridge were convicted of fraud, and sentenced to three years. They appealed. Their appeal was upheld. A verdict of acquittal was entered. There was no pardon, and proper procedures were afforded them, including Trial by Jury which convicted them in the first place.

It is not highly debatable regarding Pauline Hanson. She was jailed for fraud.

The Australia First movement jailed? What all of them? Please support your claim.

You jut get more wrong every time you type, you do know that, right?

She didn't commit fraud. She was pardoned. She was thrown in jail without proper procedure because she offended you leftards. Q2- Wikipedia and all of the other sources. look it up for yourself.

Crap. She and Ettridge were convicted of fraud, and sentenced to three years. They appealed. Their appeal was upheld. A verdict of acquittal was entered. There was no pardon, and proper procedures were afforded them, including Trial by Jury which convicted them in the first place.

Pardoned means to be found not guilty and let out aussie. How were the proper procedures upheld when she was jailed when innocent?

It is not highly debatable regarding Pauline Hanson. She was jailed for fraud.

The Australia First movement jailed? What all of them? Please support your claim.

You jut get more wrong every time you type, you do know that, right?

She didn't commit fraud. She was pardoned. She was thrown in jail without proper procedure because she offended you leftards. Q2- Wikipedia and all of the other sources. look it up for yourself.

Crap. She and Ettridge were convicted of fraud, and sentenced to three years. They appealed. Their appeal was upheld. A verdict of acquittal was entered. There was no pardon, and proper procedures were afforded them, including Trial by Jury which convicted them in the first place.

Pardoned means to be found not guilty and let out aussie. How were the proper procedures upheld when she was jailed when innocent?

You need to look up what a 'pardon' is. She was charged with fraud. She was duly tried in a District Court sitting with a Jury. The Jury convicted her. She was sentenced to three years. She appealed. The appeal was upheld by the Court of Appeal, which quashed the conviction and ordered a verdict of acquittal be entered in lieu of the conviction (in other words....no re-trial.)