Tuesday, February 14, 2017

CHAPTER 1Looks as if Ray Spiteri (in the Dec.22, 2011 St.Catharines Standard story "White Christmas? Dream on") engaged Environment Canada's senior climatologist David Phillips to determine whether a not-yet-snowy December in Niagara is proof of "climate change".Spiteri reported Phillips' reply: ""Climate Change? Could be" said Phillips "We don't know what it is.""Pardon?! "Could be" climate change???"We don't know" ???Yikes... that's probably notthe answer which the GreenFear-mongering St.Catharines Standard was really hoping for!! Hahaha: it's supposed to be "all settled"!![...see some of my favourite Cagey Climatologist David Phillips stories here; here; here; here !]Spiteri didn't bother to ask Phillips about the 'toxicity to The Planet' of the heat-trapping water-vapour cloud which Niagara Falls has been constantly releasing for some 12,000 years! [Whaaaaat? Whazzzat 'bout? Whaddaya mean..?]Why didn't Spiteri or his Standard editors also provide readers with Liberal MPP Jim Bradley's response to Phillips' "we don't know" answer, about climate change??Did Spiteri even bother to ask Niagara's Greatest GreenFear-monger, Jim 'Kyodiot' Bradley, (who, by the way, is Ontario's Environment Minister?!) You'd think that Bradley would have a completely opposite point of view than Phillips on the matter!Jim Bradley and his entire Liberal party believe that the causes of, the existence of, and the political solutions to, the issue of "climate change" HAVE ALL BEEN SETTLED!!! Spiteri surely knows about the Liberals' GreenFear peddling, doesn't he?!Bradley personally claims that man made climate change/global warming is real, and, obviously, Bradley's been blabbing that way for at least twenty years. Of course, Bradley has never provided any specific scientific basis for his claims, going back to at least 1991. The St.Catharines Standard, meanwhile, has gladly never asked. [see: Liberal MPP Jim Bradley shoots crap]Bradley most certainly claims to believe that he knows what climate change is - though strangely, a secretive Jim Bradley has never publicly revealed his supporting 'scientific basis' for his climate change beliefs - which he clearly must have already had twenty years ago!Reporter Ray Spiteri had the opportune time to ask Liberal hack MPP Jim Bradley all about his Liberal global warming AGW "evidence";to ask all about ClimateGate (# one and two);to ask all about the Mann-made hockey stick climate hoax;to ask all about the dismantling in Durban of Bradley's GreenFear weapon Kyoto, and why Bradley (McGuinty's supposed environment minister) did nothing about it; and... oh, yeah...to ask all about Phillips' 'we don't know' answer about climate change!!Spiteri ASKED NONE OF THAT!!!Conveniently, the biased wrong-righters at the St.Catharines Standard only brought us half the story, if that. (...an example of what would become more clearly known and revealed as"FAKE NEWS" after Trump was elected in 2016)There are a lot of other GreenFear-mongers in Niagara - why didn't Spiteri talk to any of them, either, so they could, once and for all, prove that Phillips is just 'full of steamy Justin Trudeau sh!t'?CHAPTER 2In the Feb. 22, 2017 Niagara Falls Review and the St.Catharines Standard, Ray Spiteri again 'interviewed' Cagey, and again, Spiteri did not bother to ask David Phillips if what Phillips was saying was the direct result of man-made (AGW) climate-change. The GreenFear-mongering insinuation that this was all due to 'climate change', was palpably present in Spiteri's piece, as Cagey Dave told Spiteri how: “These records go back to 1901. It’s hard to break a record when you’ve got over 100 years of records. I think (Thursday) could very well be (a record), especially if we get a little bit more sun than the fog that we’ve seen in some parts of southern Ontario.”Phillips said he doesn’t recall such a sustained stretch of warm weather in February such as this year.

“I don’t think there’s been a warmer week in February. What’s so interesting about this heat wave in February is that it is so persistent. You often will get one or two days where spring has arrived, and then you’re back into the cold winter weather. This has gone on. It went from (last) Saturday to this coming) Saturday"

Spiteri just obediently stenographed whatever Cagey said, without question. Spiteri could have asked: 'David, regarding this '100-yr-old record breaking February temperature' which you just mentioned, is this definitive evidence of man made climate change, the kind that Liberals such as Justin Trudeau and Jim Bradley say it is? David, you make all this innuendo about hundred year records being broken, but as Canada's Senior Climatologist, what do these records have to do with AGW climate change?David, when you say to me “I don’t think there’s been a warmer week in February",are you specifically referring to the period from 1901 to Feb. 2017? Could there have been a warmer February week anytime earlier, say, oh... in the last 10,000 years? And, why is it that you "don't think there's been a warmer week in February" - don't you know these things for sure, before you say them?Either it has been 'the warmest February week since 1901', or it hasn't - why allude to this, if you don't know? Do you want me to sensationalize the story, and spike it with GreenFear?'Sadly, Spiteri sold himself out as a journalist and simply danced the tired old Cagey Two Step Tango with David Phillips. Spiteri did NOT ask any questions, just lapped up David Phillips' sputum and regurgitated it in the St. Catharines Standard and in the Review.This was again re-confirmed in a Dec. 30, 2017 Niagara Falls Review story, where Sellout Spiteri was writing about the COLD weather (-14C - -18C) being predicted for the New Year's Eve concert in Niagara Falls, Canada; and AGAIN, Spiteri, for some reason, trotted out Cagey David Phillips to provide some fearmongering - yet Spiteri DID NOT bother to ask Canada's Cagiest Climatologist, whether the weather which Spiteri and Phillips were reporting on, was CAUSED BY MAN!!Spiteri quoted Phillips saying that the weather in Niagara Falls was "almost inhospitable" and the cold temperatures were "near record levels" - - - YET - even after all this - Sellout Spiteri COMPLETELY AVOIDED ANY MENTION of climate change / global warming / AGW {...you know, the same GreenGarbage which is spouted by Niagara Falls' own mayor, Jim Disgusting Diodati, and, by Canada's Prime Selfie Prince, Justin Turdo!Spiteri (if he had been acting as a journalist...) had a GREAT opportunity to get David Phillips to PROVE that the cold weather right in Niagara was evidence of man-made global warming (as Liberals claim) - but instead, Spiteri and Cagey hooked up to carry out just another typical version of the evasive Cagey Climate Tango stage act. They were both there NOT to prove 'climate change', but to PROPAGATE the perception of 'climate change'.The intent was to sow GreenFear, to show scary 'extremes' of weather, to create a pretense (using Cagey as a willing 'front man' veneer) that this cold weather somehow is evidence of "AGW climate change" without actually saying it, nor showing any evidence.This was just another media report in a GreenFear panoply of propaganda.CHAPTER 3 Let's look at 2016, at yet more in a long string of pathetic instances where David Phillips happily pops up in some alarmist climate-change propaganda piece, spouting what amounts to essentially pseudo-scientific baffle-gab.There was the piece of hagiograhy in the Jan.17, 2016 Toronto Red Star where Amy Dempsey fawningly writes:

"During the Harper era, when scientists were routinely restricted from speaking to the press about their research, reporters could call Phillips and ask him about anything at all."

{Nice try at deflection Amy: Your hero Cagey Dave STILL can't prove climate change is caused by humans - even in 2017, under Turdo. Get it?! Enough with your 'scientists were muzzled' Liberal bullshit propaganda! That's also Grant Lafleche's parroted meme! haha. pathetic.}“Canada’s going to be a warmer country, there’s no question about it,” he said in a January 2014 interview with Peter Mansbridge that aired on national television."

{Pardon me, Amy: your deflective slant in not questioning Cagey's assertion {that 'there is no question'} belies your bias. It's laughably taken by you as gospel - and not something to be questioned! It's just that there'd be" NO QUESTION ABOUT IT" from CBC hacks, such as Mansbridge then, or from Toronto Star hacks such as Amy Dempsey now - you see, their default position is the false "it's all settled" meme, so therefore, that conveniently precludes having to ask any inconvenient questions.

In Amy's Greenshevik-infected mind, there cannot be room for questions. The GreenFear propaganda house of cards relies on blind adherence to the "it's all settled" narrative; the GreenFear pushers require that their meme be parroted, not questioned.

Canada's Cagey Climatologist here plays to the GreenFear-infected choir - no challenge is really expected, to whatever he may blurt! If Cagey says 'there's no question' - well, then, why would the Toronto Star's Amy Dempsey ask any questions? Why disturb the mutually convenient narrative?! She's there to obediently propagate the GreenFear narrative, like a stenographer.

That's the choreographed Cagey Tango: the media don't ask, Cagey doesn't tell. It's all about the insinuation, innuendo, and hyperbole of climate change, without the actual evidence of AGW.

There ARE a lot of questions that Cagey's media sycophants just (conveniently!) can't think of asking, since they've been programmed by Al Gore, David Suzuki, Stephane Dion and Jim Bradley to believe 'it's all settled'.}

How did he get away with talking about climate change, of all things? “I think it’s because I try to stick to the science,” he says. “I stay away from the politics and the policy.”

{Hmm: 'stick to the science' eh? Swell, Dave - so, what specific "science" shows that AGW causes "climate change?? Anyone been asking you about that little detail - proof of AGW from Canada's Top Climatologist?!!
Hey David Phillips: Provide your AGW evidence, or stop with the fake climate-change propaganda!!

The Toronto Star happily publishes horseshit like this from the likes of Amy Dempsey, yet, there is no substantiation for the GreenFear innuendo being spread. It remains innuendo, fluffed and puffed by the idolizing press. Amy Dempsey - like hundreds of reporters before her - had a clear chance to ask David Phillips to show his evidence for AGW climate change; but, not surprisingly - like those hundreds of others - she didn't ask. She refused. She chose not to challenge whatever shifty gospel she may have believed that Cagey Dave was preaching, and instead, did the usual Cagey Tango}

“The other thing, too, is I never told Ottawa when I was asked for an interview. Because we were supposed to say when the interview took place, give a list of the questions, and the answers, who was it, how long was it …” Sometimes he gives 12 interviews a day. Logging that information would have eaten up much of his week. So he didn’t do it. “And they never really asked me,” he says. “They never rapped my knuckles.”

{Wow: so Cagey Dave refused to do what his employers asked him to do - gosh, what a hero.

Similarly: Amy Dempsey refused to do what journalists ought to do - ask questions.

Instead, she simply propagandized to her GreenFear-infected TorStar echo chamber.

But let's get back on track to the real issue being whitewashed here: Turdo is now PM - so, where is Amy's story NOW. asking Cagey Dave Phillips for official evidence from Environment Canada, proving AGW?!

Y'see - it was never about proving AGW; it was about dutifully extending and propagandizing the hoax; and it was about sliming Harper.They couldn't prove AGW before Harper; they couldn't prove it during Harper, and they can't prove it after Harper. But, oh, how the innuendo machine cranked out the GreenFear!!

Even though Canada's Cagey Climatologist David Phillips HIMSELF intimates that he wasNOTin any way muzzled or reprimanded under Harper, somehow his claim was either misinterpreted or purposefully misunderstood by Amy - because his phony muzzlement was a fake lib story from the beginning.

And here we see that Amy just used the phony "scientists are muzzled" meme AGAIN here in this story - really, for no other purpose than to slime Harper... - even though Turdo is in power, and even though Cagey just told her he wasn't muzzled!
So - even though Cagey sang Amy a different tune - Amy ignored him, as her mind was preoccupied with the 'it's all settled' GreenCrap agenda}

"Perhaps it’s because he walked the line without stepping over it, stating facts without casting blame or offering his opinion. Or maybe after 48 years and all his achievements, he’s untouchable".
{GreenFear pushers eagerly want Cagey to crow on about climate change. Over the years, hundreds of them tried to spin Cagey's facts about weather into innuendo-laden GreenFear doomsday stories - - - like Amy does
If Cagey is 'untouchable', it is only because propagandists such as Amy Dempsey allow him to be! Do you understand your own willing role as an enabler here, Amy? Do you get your own role in your own self-fulfilling prophesy?!}

"Phillips acknowledges that colleagues may have felt he didn’t use his platform to take a strong enough stand on climate change".
{You were getting close, here Amy - but you chose not to cross the line from being a biased GreenFear propaganda peddler to acting as an impartial journalist!}.

"And indeed, his friend Phil Chadwick, who speaks admiringly of Phillips, says: “I wish sometimes he would have been a bit more definitive on climate change, but I totally understood what his circumstances were.”

{Maybe Cagey doesn't have the 'definitive' evidence which admirer Chadwick thinks he has!
How much more climate change innuendo would Chadwick like Cagey to peddle? Does he want Cagey to lie??
Let's ask AGAIN, since Chadwick (like Amy) seems to have had his ears full of GreenCrap: WHAT exactly did Chadwick "totallyunderstand" about Cagey's "circumstances"?!?
Cagey wasn't muzzled; Cagey makes that clear himself. Yet, that just cannot register in Chadwick's or Amy's GreenFear-packed skulls. So, what the f*ck is Chadwick talking about?!

What exactly were these ominous 'circumstances' which Chadwick mentions - other than the already false innuendo of 'muzzlement'?!
What were these mysterious "circumstances" which, in some unexplained-by-anyone way, held back Cagey?!???
Chadwick doesn't really say, and Amy doesn't bother to ask Chadwick!! Great journalism propaganda, eh??! Furthermore, neither did Amy ask Cagey himself, to explain what he thought Chadwick meant! Her goal was simply to paint an image of innuendo!!

Amazing: Amy's story - without questioning - just piles on innuendo BASED ON OTHER INNUENDO!! Sort of like Climate Gate was all about, BTW!

In fact, the case can strongly be made, that Cagey WASN'T ASKED by Amy about proving AGW, because it would require him providing actual evidence (rather than loquacious innuendo).
So, he couldn't very well risk having anyone actually pinning him down with unexpected specific questions on climate change, which would soon show that the "climate change" aspects of any of Cagey's claims were essentially conflated, glorified, weather garbage.

Does Chadwick really think that David Phillips isn't cagey enough to not get caught in a climate change lie? Cagey's moniker ain't fer nothin', you know!!!

There is a pretension to uphold here for the AGW-infected community, which would not hold up under scrutiny.
It's best for the media just to play along with the Cagey Tango, and NOT ask for AGW specifics; beat around the bush all ya want, conflate this with that, throw in some irrelevant innuendo together with some homespun homilies - just DON'T ask Canada's Senior Climatologist for the Chadwickian "definitive" evidence of AGW!
The hoax itself must not be challenged. (Read Chapter 17 below, to see how CTV did it - it's the same template, over and over...)

Does Chadwick prefer that Cagey just out and out peddle climate change lies???
Would that satisfy Chadwick - having Cagey become an outright GreenFear-monger?

Cagey's slicker than that: Cagey peddles climate innuendo!!! Your perception of what Cagey peddles is YOUR problem, make of it what you will. Hey, it's hot - is it climate change, or weather... who knows? Hey, it's cold - is it climate change or weather... who knows?! And Cagey's trademarked folksy caginess just rolls on.}

"Phillips strives for balance. The doom-and-gloom perspective of some environmentalists has never sat well with him. “Why would we change if the world’s going to end in 2056?” he says. “I think you’ve gotta give people hope. And so what I try to do is to say you know it’s not necessarily doom and gloom. It’s not the end.”"

{Yet unbalanced Liberal GreenFear pushers - y'know, the carbon-tax pushing doomsayers who always tell us that we're past some imaginary 'tipping-point' - WANT you to believe that 'it's the end'.}

CHAPTER 4

Another example of classic GreenFear crap appeared in Joseph Brean's Dec. 7, 2016 National Post story:"...Environment Canada’s senior meteorologist {...note: some some reason, Phillips was referred to as a 'meteorologist' in this NP story, yet in other past publications he was referred to as 'senior climatologist'...} David Phillips said the main effect of this increasingly moist warm air is that when it rains, more falls in less time, as in the kind of deluge Phillips called a "Texas gullywasher"...Canada is second coldest and first snowiest country in the world, so it is hard to convince Canadians that climate change “has some evil to it,” Phillips said. Many simply look fondly to a future of milder winters and longer summers. A bit of flooding might seem like a small price to pay.

But as he described it, this is not your grandfather’s flood, the classic river backup caused by melt water and ice blockage. It is a modern artifact of a highly urbanized society in an era of warming climate, when a single flooded road can leave people stranded and at risk of death.

“That’s the kind of thing that scares the bejeebies out of insurance people,” he said. “You could have floodier floods and droughtier droughts.””So, there you are:the Jim "Liberal Gullywasher Of Bullshit" Bradley Scientific School Of Floodier Floods And Droughtier Droughts... Now MORE STEAMIER and MORE CRAPPIER than ever!There you have it: the National Post reporter Brean DID NOT ask David Phillips to provide actual specific evidence of AGW.Instead - as many other reporters have similarly done with Cagey Climatologist David Phillips in the past - the National Post simply fear-mongered and spread fake news about climate-change, using David Phillips' silly, homey - but ultimately non-substantive - pontifications as a 'legitimizing' cover. The Cagey Climatologist Fan Club just loves Phillips. CHAPTER 5 -

DID the CBC and ENVIRONMENT CANADA employee David Phillips conspire to create fake 'climate-change news'?

Let's continue with Cagey's Climate Saga:In a Sheena Goodyear story written Dec. 7, 2016, the CBC happily, obligingly published an outright lie with their deceptive, GreenFear-laden headline"The weather outside is frightful thanks to climate change and the polar vortex", (scary eh?! - apparently, Canada never had cold and snow before...umm... 'climate change'...) The CBC, naturally, had to run to Canada's Cagey Climatologist for a bit'o'GreenFear-mongering:"... "Instead of a bungee cord, it looks like more of a roller-coaster. It dips and dives. It kind of goes up over British Columbia and then dives down across the Prairies down to the United States and then comes swooping up towards eastern Canada," he says.

Sometimes, it brings warm air from the United States, giving Canada the warm November it just had. But then it swoops down and brings cold Arctic air, which is what's happening right now in western Canada.

And the cold tends to linger.

"It's hard to kick the cold air out. It's like molasses — it's thick, it's heavy, it's dense, it hugs the ground," Phillips said. "So when it becomes entrenched, well, you get that pattern set up and it just doesn't move, you see. You get day after day and week after week and then, my God, month after month with the same kind of flow."

The polar vortex

So how does climate change come into all of this?

Arctic and Antarctic sea ice have reached record lows, declining by an area twice the size of Alaska, according to recent measurements.

"We're seeing the Arctic ice cap is melting. We're seeing more open water. The ice is thinner and so there's more heat getting up from the water into the air in the Arctic," Phillips says..

This causes the polar vortex — a swirling area of low-pressure cold air over the North Pole — to weaken.

"Therefore, it leaves home. It migrates," Phillips says. "It's sort of like Canadians going to Florida for the winter. The polar vortex comes south, and it hangs out down in the South and, of course, it brings its cold wind with it."

The bright side?

The good news is the wobbly jet stream means there will most likely be periods of respite this winter. What's more, meteorologists predict this La Nina will be a weak one.

"We don't think it's going to be, as they say, a punishing winter, in spite of what the west are seeing right now," Phillips says.

"I'm not saying it's going to be the Goldilocks of winters but ... if you can remember the toughest winter you ever lived through and then remember last year, it might be something between those two."."

Yep: 'My God, it might be this, or... uhh... it might be that... it's a roller coaster, it dips, it dives, it swoops, it's like molasses'... blah bla bla...

Phillips' blathering completely evades the issue that 'climate change' is being used here as political propaganda. Phillips never says (but more pointedly, he isNEVER ASKEDby hack CBC reporter Sheena Easton to prove) that the 'climate change' they are referring to, is caused by man (AGW). After all, isn't that what it's all about?? What a bait-and-switch dance of conflation going on here! 'The ice is melting' they both fear-monger - but without revealing their underlying {emphasis on the 'lying' part...} built-in-bias: that they both believe this melting is caused BY MAN. There's the con: they carefully construct and "report" a one-sided storyline here (it's NOT impartial: it's propaganda, rigged by the reporters and by Cagey in a dance to further THEIR mutual narratives. They need to create the impression (and to re-create and endlessly repeat this impression...) that EVERYTHING to do with the weather - including, of course, 'the climate' - IS 'man-made'! That IS their starting-off point: the "it's all settled" lie is essentially built into the core narratives of both the gov't financed CBC and the gov't financed Environment Propaganda Ministry front-man here; the aim of their GreenFear propaganda is to make it seem that there can be no other reason for ice to exist or to melt, or for the jet stream or the polar vortex to exist, or to ever have existed, prior to the footsteps of man soiling upon the virgin green Utopia of Earth, the GreenFear crowd's Great Gaia's Garden of Man-less Eden.The Toronto Star prints a false headline ominously blaming "climate change" - - - for causing winter weather! In this CBC report, David Phillips happily makes the (deceptive) case for an even-happier CBC, that the 'polar vortex' was a certainty, and that it was caused by climate change, which was caused by man. The take away {the con-job} being peddled for CBC's viewers, is that the polar vortex is man made - why, look: 'we even have David Phillips here', proving this to be true!!The "climate change" being referred to here was NOT defined, by either party here, as being of a natural origin, of natural drivers - this was purposefully left out (censored) of the story. So CBC only peddled the 'it's all settled' GreenFear-based 'conclusion': purporting that what BOTH David Phillips and the CBC are saying, is that they are BOTH talking about 'man made climate change' here. {Why did the ice melt? 'Climate Change'! Who caused climate change? 'Man'! Did man create the polar vortex? 'Yes'! Did man create the weather? Yes - because he also created climate change and the polar vortex!!! Geez: can't you read the CBC's headline??! It's all right there; and David Phillips said so - so it's gotta be true!!}However, because David Phillips, Environment Canada's SENIOR Climatologist { who's acting as somekind of "scientainer" TM, a hybrid mockery /parody of a scientist / entertainer...!} did NOT botherto try to make a clear distinction here himself in CBC's story; and furthermore, because Phillips did NOT issue any post-story clarifications himself, nor make any calls for retraction or raise any subsequent issues about the CBC's spin, then Phillips clearly allowed and approved the CBC to utilize his tax-payer-funded position as Environment Canada's senior climatologist to 'legitimize' their climate deception. How can this example of climate-change-conjob collusion be a one way street here? How can it be said that poor ole Cagey somehow didn't know what the CBC was doing with HIS information?! It takes two to tango - and this is a blatant example of the duplicitous Cagey Two Step Climate Tango. BOTH parties participating in Cagey's dirty tango are NOT 'honest brokers' - they are compromised and tainted. David Phillips agreed without reservation to have the CBC use him as a 'face', a stooge, a front, a willing dupe, to provide a fraudulent 'cover' so CBC could peddle their political climate scientainment TM/propaganda! (because, it wasn't science..!)This demonstrates that Phillips (a government employee) had no problems using his tax-payer-funded 'celebrity', his 'stature', to directly support CBC's unsubstantiated climate propaganda. He did not dis-associate himself from CBC's fraudulent bait and switch climate change tactics.Phillips gave this CBC story his blessing, and willingly looked the other way when his own participation was perverted by CBC's spin; tellingly, the climate stooge Phillips did not bother to correct or disavow CBC's unsubstantiated spin, neither before nor after the story appeared, even though CBC fraudulently traded on Phillip's image and reputation to peddle their climate lies. David Phillips' image and reputation was paid for by tax-dollars.David Phillips participated WILLINGLY in this CBC bait and switch climate-change propaganda effort... yet, neither David Phillips nor the CBC had any proof that the polar vortex is man-made; nor any proof that "climate change" is man made.

(Let's remember this deception, and compare it to Cagey's future "polar vortex" position in Chapter 32 )Yet no one asks Ole Cagey Dave to prove that "climate change" caused by man, caused winter.... get it? Get the ridiculousness of their scam now?

Isn't it the spectre of AGW {which is the GreenFear movement's underlying tenet; their touchstone, their foundation; their unshakable premise; their supporting pillar, their all-pervading, 'all-settled' undercurrent} which the CBC and others are hoping that the Cagey Climatologist will confirm through loquacious innuendo (...yet without actually saying so, nor providing proof) that 'climate change' is ALL MAN-MADE, and, that it can only be mitigated by lots of new taxes being instituted and spent by 'well-meaning' Liberals??

Phillips seems more than happy to oblige as a cover for GreenFear-pushers, who act as if for millions of years, some kind of fictitious climate stasis had always been the norm, and that 'climate change' (...which, of course, we have been all indoctrinated 'nudge-nudge-wink-wink' to believe was caused by Harris, Harper, Bush... now Trump... and those denying deniers...) is somehow the new kid on the block, as if the climate, before man, had NEVER changed before (!!)... and furthermore, that 'climate-change' can not only be stopped, but can even be REVERSED (wahoooo!!) simply by voting for creeps such as Justin Trudeau, Elizabeth May, Jim Bradley, and Kathleen Wynne!!

It's Phillips and his interviewers who seem to 'dip' and dive' for the cause, peddling their pattern of entrenched views, trying their best to soft-peddle Jim Bradley's Liberal Green Fear delusions.

CBC's slick propaganda peddled here is in the hazy 'nudge-nudge-wink-wink-y'know-what-we mean-and-who-is-to-blame' assumptions being made, and the definitions remaining purposefully fuzzy and unspecified. It's just great all-purpose, typical climatalarmist propaganda - no other way to describe it, is there?

Sadly, Canada's Cagey Climatologist, by abiding in this effort, has shown which way his wind blows.

CHAPTER 6

On the CBC nightly news (Dec.23, 2016) there was another sacred confirmation of how far global warming and climate change has been shoved up CBC 'reporter's' asses, and how they dutifully shovel their GreenFear onto their loving, appreciative, sheep-like audience. Wendy Mesley and that creepy CBC 'science' guy Bob McDonald were in a smug sanctimonious lather about Trump referring to THEIR beloved climate change religion as a hoax. You could see the seething hate/shock/disdain in their eyes; their non-comprehension of how anyone could challenge their GreenFear gospel. It was revealing, it was a teachable moment, it was precious and above all, it was sad. It wasn't news that these two CBC clowns were reporting, it was Green Bolshevik agit-prop.

And no; they did not bother to ask Cagey the Canadian Climate King about why Environment Canada hasn't proven the very "climate change" which they themselves were just sneering at Trump about.

Is somebody at CBC "muzzling" Mesley or McDonald, to stop them from obtaining all the "climate change" proof they could ever want, from Canada's Chief Climatologist, David Phillips???

(hahahah.... as if Wendy and Bob were really ever going to go to Cagey to PROVE CLIMATE CHANGE once and for all... hahahah)

Or, is someone "muzzling" Ole Cagey, stopping him from revealing the actual evidence of climate change, once and for all??!!

Funny how these GreenFear pushers continually spout their climate fear agenda, yet somehow can't get/won't provide the actual evidence, which supposedly exists right under their noses at the now-supposedly-un-muzzled Environment Canada!!

All the CBC reporters had to do was ASK CAGEY to show them the climate change proof - - but that is NOT the point is it? The point is to keep the GreenFear charade afloat, not to really prove it; the point is to spread endless innuendo and confuse and conflate cherry picked weather with meaningless climate projections, with hints that "progressive" saviours such as Liberal charlatans Jim Bradley or Justin Trudeau can PREVENT the climate from changing, if only they could have an endless supply of taxes.

To closed-minded CBC clowns, their GreenFear-based religion is 'all-settled' and cannot be questioned. It was a typical drive-by anti-Trump smear, but, apparently it's mandatory for the CBC to keep flailing Liberal climate change deceptions.

"According to Dave Phillips, a senior climatologist with Environment Canada, the weather system moved from the northwestern part of the United States and over to the Great Lakes, heading northeast. A majority of areas in southern Ontario are expected to get anywhere from 10 to 15 centimetres of snow by Monday morning.“That’s more than we had all of last year and this is only the first big one,” Phillips told CTV News Channel on Sunday.."

WHAT UTTER CRAP FROM CANADA'S CAGEY CLIMATOLOGIST DAVID PHILLIPS!!

OMG: Canada's SENIOR CLIMATOLOGIST is warning us this is only the first big one ---- that means, there will be more Big Ones ---- Ohhh Great Gaia... what to do? --- what to do?!? --- can we get Liberal hacks Trudeau and Jim Bradley to prevent all this???We MUST STOP THE CLIMATE FROM CHANGING - NOW!!! We don't want any 'Big Ones' anymore!! We want nothing to change!!

There was not much snow at all in St. Catharines during Dec. 11 - Dec 12, 2016!! A little bit of snow fell overnight - WAY LESS than what fell during "ALL OF LAST YEAR", as David Phillips fear-mongered about, and got completely wrong.

Canada's Cagey Climatologist CANNOT GET THE WEATHER right, a DAY in advance; yet, this is the same darling go-to guy when the media needs a booster-dose of Climate Change GreenFear.

But... oh, yes... Slick Cagey always has an out {...hence, the nick name!} He did say "a majority of areas are expected to get anywhere from 10 15 cm..." so, there ya go: ya can't pin Ole Cagey down! Ya can't make the crap stick to Cagey, there's always some indecipherable home-spun connotation, some weasel word, an asterisk, an 'expectation', a qualifier, a generalization, a 'potentially' this, a' likely' that, a 'possibility' here, a 'probability' there...

After all, in Cagey's world, some snow was bound to fall somewhere, right!? Point is: was this man-made climate change at work??? The CTV reporter NEVER ASKED.

Was there some unspoken rule that, in literally hundreds of interviews over the years, prevented anyone from asking Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips to provide evidence of 'climate change' caused by man? Why isn't anyone actually asking Cagey Dave about that?! Why isn't ANYONE asking David Phillips if the 'climate' can be prevented from 'changing', and if so, how?! What is it with this phony dance, this Cagey Two-Step, which the media continually performs with David Phillips?

Gosh: if we gave ALL of our treasury's dollars to Justin Trudeau and to Kathleen Wynne to Save The Planet, will that Stop And Reverse Climate Change???????! Will we finally get rid of this horrible changing climate once and for all, and just go back to a good ole static climate, where nothing ever changed, like we once had for millions of years when everything was good, when there was no climate change... heh heh... to scare us - - - until that Harris came along and ruined it all? Seriously... this is what Liberal MPP Jim Bradley - Ontario's Godfather Of GreenFear - wanted us to believe...

Politics and weather are conflated for political purposes.

The cumulative work is in conflating weather with GreenFear, using elements of the former to 'hint at' (but not prove) the latter.

CHAPTER 8

Another instance: Dec.21, 2016 CTV News presenter (reporter??) Erin Paul had the apparently-mandatory-because-it's-the-start-of-winter TV interview ("The real deal is coming".... ohh... ohhhh... are you afraid yet of the ominous GreenFear being peddled??!) with the "expert" Senior Climatologist David Phillips, and there was a lot of the typical homey banter.

Yet, CTV reporter Erin Paul did NOT ask the "expert":

'David, is this climate change? Is this all caused by anthropogenic, man-made global warming? Do you have any evidence that this is man-made 'climate-change'?

I'm asking you this specifically, because also today - Dec. 21, 2016, the same day that we are interviewing you - CTV reported Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau saying that 'climate change is a fact'.

David, what 'climate change fact' is the Prime Minister referring to here?

Do you - as Canada's Senior Climatologist - have any evidence of the 'climate change fact' which Justin Trudeau is talking about? Don't the pipelines, which Trudeau was approving today - while telling us that 'climate change is a fact' - carry oil which supposedly causes climate change??!

David can you please expand on these specific definitions, and reconcile these assumptions, which have become political memes without scientific bearing?'

Note that CTV never bothered to ask about the conflicting 'climate-change news' reports appearing on the same day, on their own site!

They had a chance to question Phillips, yet, they demurred, and shied away from the issue of climate change.

THAT kind of conversation WILL NEVER HAPPEN on Canadian media.

Remember the Liberal meme about 'Canada's scientists being muzzled'?!

Yet: when exactly had David Phillips ever been"muzzled"???? Has anyone ever asked Phillips about THAT meme??!

Has Justin Trudeau ever directed Canada's esteemed - and unmuzzled! - Environment Canada to provide evidence of the 'fact' of 'man-made climate change', so that his Liberals can justify valiantly "battling climate change" by spending ever-more taxes?!Wouldn't Cagey be more than happy to provide Justin Trudeau with this proof, with this "fact" - as Trudeau claims - of man-made climate change?!Seems like Trudeau won't ask, because Phillips can't prove it.

Here we are at the end of 2016 - yet, the media continue their darling little GreenFear dance with Cagey; they are SELF-'MUZZLING'; conspiring together in a careful dance NOT to actually confront the 'climate change' charade which they both dance around, and sadly, help perpetuate - this is the Cagey Two Step Climate Tango.It seems like an unspoken don't ask/don't tell arrangement - the media doesn't ask what Phillips can't (won't?) answer; in turn, Phillips happily abides, spouting cagey weather homilies and dire innuendo, but never really addressing the elephant in the room: providing evidence that "climate change" is "man made".

After some 30,000 (yes... 30,000... Don't believe it? See Chapter 32!) of interviews over the years, by hundreds upon hundreds of writers: where's David Phillips' defense - or repudiation - of the meme (which Justin Trudeau now repeats) that 'man-made climate change' is a fact??

This CTV reporter Erin Paul (as did many other reporters before her) HAD THE CHANCE to ACTUALLY ask David Phillips some real questions, butREFUSED to do so - all we got was softball 'nudge-nudge-wink-wink' FLAKY FLUFF.

CHAPTER 9

Speaking about flaky fluff, here we go with yet another TYPICAL example of yet ANOTHER vacuous interview with Canada's Cagey Climatologist, David Phillips (...the dance never ends with this guy: the media's at him essentially everyday...) This time it was reporter Bill Graveland who joined the long list of partners sent in to dance with Cagey Dave (Globe and Mail (Jan.13, 2017):

"It’s not as if winter is over by a long shot,” Phillips said. “We’ve just hit the halfway point, but the good news is ... the flow seems to be coming more from the Pacific than the Arctic.”

Although there are no records being set in Western Canada, Phillips said it has been a tough year for the four western provinces. Vancouver has received twice as much snow as normal and recorded 30 days where temperatures were below normal — double the average of 15. “It has been persistently cold for that period,” said Phillips. “In fact, if you look at the average temperature in December, the last time there was a colder December was 1990. That was more than 25 years ago. It was a bit of a shocker.”

Winnipeg received a record snowfall for the month of December, while Calgary has suffered freezing temperatures and heavy snow. This winter in Western Canada follows one of the warmest years on record in 2015 and, in many jurisdictions, winter was essentially cancelled last year, he said.

Canadians tend to base their weather expectations on the winter before, so this season has come as a shock to many, Phillips said.

“It’s like a punch in the face. Clearly, when you look at the temperatures, certainly the amount of snow, the number of cold days — if you’re whining, it’s not without cause. It has been tough.”

Reporter Graveland never once asked David Phillips whether the 'persistent cold' was caused by man-made global warming / climate change (...as experienced climatologists like... um... Jane Fonda or... ah... Leo 'What's a Chinook?' DiCaprio might have us believe). Graveland didn't ask exactly WHY it was a "shocker" that the month of Dec. 2016 was the coldest December since Dec. 1990.

Was this cold directly attributable to AGW climate change???? Or was it the previous warmth?!??

And, also Mr. Phillips: who would be 'shocked' - and why?

What kind of expectations had been fed to those who suddenly, somehow, were 'punched in the face' and became 'shocked'? Were these people 'shocked' because they experienced a paradigm-shift after having been conditioned (ie punched in the face?!) by years of leftist GreenFear-mongering?

The only people who ought to have been shocked are those who were conned by GreenFear-mongering face-punchers that climate change is caused by man; it would be a shock to them, seeing as they were being told everyday to believe that the earth was warming and that man caused it all.

When Phillips claimed that "winter was essentially cancelled last year"...

Graveland DID NOT BOTHER to ask Phillips exactly where, in which exact jurisdictions was winter 'cancelled'? Was Phillips referring to the Prairies in 2016?!

Neither did Graveland bother to ask Phillips if his statement that "winter was cancelled" was direct evidence of climate change!After all: the opening WAS RIGHT THERE for Graveland to ask for clarification - yet this reported REFUSED!!

Winter was cancelled, Cagey tells him; sounds like global warming, then, doesn't it?! Yet: there was NO follow up from this Globe and Mail reporter!!

Cagey's comments were just left there unquestioned - as a meme to hang and ferment in the reader's mind...... Winter was cancelled... Winter was cancelled... Winter was cancelled... repeat... Winter was cancelled... Winter was cancelled... it must be Global Warming, you see; it's gotta be Climate Change, you see... Winter was cancelled... Do not ask why... Winter was cancelled. . .All that reporter Graveland had to do (...as a journalist in a supposedly 'open and free' society) was to follow up on Cagey's statements: "David, you just stated that winter was essentially cancelled in the Canadian West in 2016, correct? Was that directly attributable to Global Warming, caused by man?"

The Globe and Mail had the chance (but refused) to pin down Canada's Senior Climatologist and get down to the facts and get the evidence of all that 'man made global warming / climate change' which Jim Bradley, Justin Trudeau, Kathleen Wynne... and climatologist Jane Fonda... say is happening.

But facts would cloud and hinder the continual propagation of GreenFear innuendo; therefore, we have this ongoing, drawn-out Cagey Tango, where the two willing dancers coyly carry out their choreographed moves, winking at each other knowingly, dropping an opening hint here, a seductive spin there, coyly suggesting the kinds of things both know must better be left unsaid... ... sheesh...

Was reporter Graveland self-muzzled, or was he muzzled by his Globe and Mail bosses to NOT ask Environment Canada's Senior Cagey Climatologist for evidence to support that what Phillips reports, is directly attributable to climate change? That IS the intended, underlying message here, isn't it - alleging 'climate change', without proving it? Scaring the shit out of people with doomsday GreenFear innuendo so that leftists can have their excuse to raise taxes?

Why the massive disconnect between the media blaring everyday about 'climate change' - - and yet, not actually asking for the corroborating evidence about said 'climate change' from Canada's SENIOR climatologist?

It should be easy for Phillips to prove {...seeing as that even Al Gore and David Suzuki and Leonardo DiCaprio and Jerry Brown and Stephane Dion... and we can now add the disgusting hack Juliete Payette to the GreenFear cabal...) ALL 'know' that global warming is caused by man! 'It's all settled', doncha know!!

So why can't Canada's Senior Climatologist actually come out and admit that everything he reports, is and always was, caused by man-made climate change?!

Cagey is not muzzled anymore, under Turdo, is he?? (...as the Canadian lefties loved to allege when Harper was in power, when they were spreading the meme that "Canada's scientists are being muzzled") Which scientists were muzzled? Was it David Phillips? Or is Philips not a "scientist", just a glorified weatherman??!! Why is this guy ALWAYS being quoted, and yet, after the interview, we are left with the realization that he had nothing to say. How can this occur over literally thousands of media interviews over the years - and never a request - nor an answer - about proving climate change?! Its FLICKING unreal.

Cagey Dave could just come right out and now admit that EVERY interview he has given since he started his career, was actually a long-arc demonstration of climate change evidence, right from the start, from Day One.

He could say "Over the thousands of interviews I've given over the years, I can now admit that I have been actually reporting on man-made climate-change all this time, since the beginning of my career, because man causes the climate which creates the weather. Or maybe it's the other way around? {Oh, well... as Hillary conveniently says, what it does it matter now, anyway?!} Man definitely has always had something to do with it, way before I came along. Don't blame me, I'm just the messenger; blame man. Man is to blame for the weather which causes the climate to change, which then changes the weather - or something like that! - you see? This has always been so, since the dawn of man."

That would make Al Gore and Canada's Climate Clown Catherine McKenna and Jim Bradley real happy. So, why isn't David Phillips letting loose and telling us the truth? What's he hiding about climate change??!

Speaking of DiCaprio, Robert Williamson commented: "Leonardo DiCaprio's 8,000 mile round trip in one day on a private jet.. He's one of the morons that tells all the rest of us that we have to cut back our middle class lifestyles to "..save the planet" Leonardo DiCaprio jumped on to a private jet to fly from Cannes on the French Riviera, to New York, U.S.A. After receiving a green award, the actor then flew straight back across the Atlantic to France again so he would not miss the banquet and party with his friends at an AIDs benefit gala. He spent a week lounging on his superyacht in the Mediterranean, just after receiving another environmental accolade. Leonardo DiCaprio flew to Brazil on another trip to catch the soccer matches.... then cruised up and down the South American coast ...partying with his friends on his Arab pal's motor yacht which he chartered... one of the largest private yachts in the world... His Arab pal is from the United Arab Emirates and he's an oil tycoon. The yacht is the fifth largest private yacht in the world.. It's name is "Topaz". Length: 147 m (482 ft) Beam: 21.50 m (70.5 ft) The main engines of the Topaz are twin Pielstick diesel engines, each with power of 7990 hp. This is enough power for the yacht to reach a service speed of 22.9 knots, while the maximum speed is over 25.5 knots. The yacht is also equipped with two diesel generators and an emergency diesel generator. These aggregates provide power to the stabilizers, navigation equipment and all the facilities on board. Topaz is equipped with zero-speed stabilizers, jacuzzi (on deck), double helicopter landing pads, swimming pool, tender garage, swimming platform, air conditioning, underwater lights. There's also a fitness hall, cinema and a large conference room.
And in 2014, emails hacked from film studio Sony revealed he took six private flights in just six weeks which cost $138,616.00 This travel included two round trips from Los Angeles to New York, and one from LA to Las Vegas. This is the moron who spoke on the horrors of climate change/global warming at the U.N. and took advantage of the Oscar Ceremonies to speak on how bad Global Warming and CO2 are... and how all of us have to cut way back on our CO2 producing lifestyles.... to "...save the planet.." and how me must leave the oil in the ground "...where it belongs."﻿

Kurt Boyd commented on the hypocrisy of the climate-change GreenFear peddling movement: "The Left has figured out long ago that signaling virtue is far easier than actually having virtue".﻿

CHAPTER 10

The Sad Saga of Canada's Cagey Climatologist continues:

Fast forward to another CBC GreenFear piece (Jan.31, 2017) this time written by Lauren Pelley, where the dark insinuation is that somehow climate change caused the month of January to be cloudy, sunless, and , well... dark. Lauren Pelley again does the Cagey Two Step Tango with David Phillips, never once asking Cagey "Is all this evidence of man made climate change, Dave? Will the carbon taxes legislated by Sunny Ways Turdo eliminate these dark days forever, Dave? Should we all vote for the Liberals, Dave, to Save The Planet From Dark Peril??"

Another sad demo of Fake News on the GreenFear-peddling climate front, in a long line of similar Cagey Dave propaganda.

C'mon, somebody: just ask Ole David Phillips, if he has any evidence whatsoever of man made climate change!

NO ONE is preventing Canada's Senior Cagey Climatologist from answering.

No one is muzzling David Phillips! (Eh, Grant Lafleche?)

It's apparent that NO ONE IS ASKING!The Cagey Two-Step should be called the Cagey Side Step Climate Tango, because that's what both participants in these climatalarmist phony 'interviews' are doing: one partner neatly, deftly side-steps asking 'questions', while the other moves in unison to provide nebulous, conflated side-stepping deflective 'answers'. It's a spectacle of fancy footwork, from which neither rutting party comes away virtuous.

The reporters are muzzling themselves, dancing a side-step around the climate change AGW issue with Ole Cagey, but never directly addressing it. By reading/seeing their breathless media reports and interviews with Cagey, they create an appearance {an illusion} as if they are actually discussing and demonstrating 'evidence' of 'man-made climate change'!!The stench of underlying GreenFear permeates their phony reports, the main purpose of which is to propagandize FOR GreenFear-policies, without actually demonstrating that the weather event factoids which Dave spouts, are actually caused by man.

All these "reports" over the years, all these sordid tangos danced with cagey David Philips, amount to an impressive oeuvre of unsubstantiated GreenFear propaganda. It's a homey pastiche of cagily subtle hints, causal conflation, insidious double-meanings, allusions, illusions, dire innuendo, oblique comparisons.

Why aren't hacks such as Lauren Pelley (...in a long line of sad stenographers, pathetically posing as 'journalists'...) asking the question?

The Canadian and the Ontario governments peddle claims about climate change which Canada's Senior Climatologist Phillips (to his discredit) cagily refuses to address (...although, of course, he freely could), and furthermore, which his enabler-"interviewers" (to their discredit) never dare ask (...although, of course, they freely could).

Therefore we have this ongoing delicately deceptive, deflective Cagey Tango, this phony show where two willing nudge-nudge-wink-wink partners choreograph their coy side-stepping dance to propagate the GreenFear pretense without challenging the underlying premise. As the saying goes, it takes two to tango, so we see that Cagey and his long line of pathetic interviewers/dance partners always seem to follow the same moves, the same side-stepping template - they have both willingly peddled what amounts to a long-arc of innuendo posing as 'it's all settled climate science'.

In other words, it's designed to be fake - - it is appearance over substance; the propaganda effect is in performing the Cagey Climate Tango in an illusory way that makes one believe that somehow, what is being shown shows evidence of climate change, when in fact, after radio interviews, after TV interviews, after newspaper interviews - no such evidence is actually produced: Cagey babbles on and his bobble-headed interviewer-stenographers just nod in blank stupor and write whatever Cagey says, without question.

It's designed to be 'politics-disguised-as-science' propaganda - a cagey conspiracy that is inherently apparent throughout thousands of Cagey interviews ( see Chapter 32!): how can the question of "man made climate change" not ever be raised? They just dance their tango around the issue, using dexterous moves to side-step from their faulty "it's all settled" premise.

It's as if the press spins what Cagey says as being 'evidence of climate change', when Cagey was only nudge-nudge-wink-wink talking about common weather - - - a disconnect of cross-purposes, with the press seeing only what they wanted to see. Is that delusional or premeditated?! Who is pandering to who?? Who are they trying to con?

It's like David Phillips is in a weatherman'sCanadian version of Being There; he's acting as Canada's Chauncey Gardener of weather, where Cagey Dave has been elevated to some kind of climate change deity, where everything he says is taken at face-value as wise greenie gospel explaining man made climate change.

And yet, you'd think that David Phillips would have recognized this scenario a long time ago, after perhaps being misunderstood after several interviews, and then set the record straight by openly saying yes, this IS evidence of AGW, or, no, this ISN'T evidence of AGW.

But Cagey Dave didn't challenge his interviewer's reports. They came to him, begging for wisdom and climate guidance, as they flocked to Chauncey. Cagey became a light in their proverbial darkness. They heard what Cagey uttered, and determined that it was wisdom. It reaffirmed their own beliefs, spoke to their innate suspicions, reflected their own illusions - how could it not mirror their own default bias?! Like Chauncey Gardener, Dave let the charade continue for years; unlike Chauncey, though, Cagey Dave had a chance - many chances - to set the record straight.

Again, you'd think that all those Canadian GreenFear-pushing media outlets which amplify the climate change lie on a daily basis, would have asked David Phillips, or flakey Liberals such as Justin Trudeau, Catherine McKenna, Jim Bradley, Stephane Dion, or Kathleen Wynne, or daffy David Suzuki, for their detailed responses - detailed responses, you know, not the politicized GreenGarbage rhetoric that is their usual hallmark.

"...One has to wonder why, if the case for man-made warming is so tenuous, would alarmists resort to such questionable methods? Wouldn't the more obvious recourse be to question the hypothesis itself? But such is the state of the contemporary global warming debate. Hundreds of advocacy groups are engaged in an all-out campaign to certify the premise of anthropogenic warming..."

That sums up the bullshit which has been spewed by the skewed left, deluded and besotted with creating a scenario of fear to push their socialist agenda. Canada's prime minister Zoolander Turdo has happily pushed the phony climate change agenda - yet, we are to believe that somehow scientists were umm... 'muzzled'... by someone {...Harper, Trump, Harris, Diefenbaker...???} to prevent them from revealing their unfounded 'truth' about supposed man made climate change!!!

It's a bizarre reverse-onus bias being peddled here.The 'man made global-warming / climate-change' hypothesis is NOT to be questioned; it is to be treated as Green Gospel.

The thing is, no one has asked Liberal climate liars Jim Bradley or Stephane Dion or Justin Trudeau, for their detailed evidence on supposed man-made climate-change, details on the underlying AGW premise which they use on a daily basis to further their socialist agendas.

These unsubstantiated claims you often hear in the media that 'science is muzzled' are themselves regurgitations of a phony meme, still constantly repeated in Green Bolshevik echo chambers; y'know, 'Harper muzzled scientists'; 'Trump muzzles science' etc.

Yet, when exactly was 'science muzzled'??? No one has ever asked the politicians who ought to know - such as Canada's and Ontario's Liberals, for example!!

There again is the falsity of the Green Lie; Liberals in power in Canada - such as Jim Bradley - get away with peddling climate change bullshit without ever being held to account by a complicit media! The phony policies based on fairy-tale AGW fear-mongering are accepted, not questioned.

The media set the tone to ease in the Green Fear agenda years ago. The media has acted as the protectors for the political policies for which there is no scientific basis, spreading a meme that 'science is being muzzled' - YET, they also spread the meme that 'the science is settled' - - - how utterly convenient to have these two contradictory memes in use, to support the same agenda!!!

Interesting how the scientists whoare supposedly 'muzzled', are only those who peddle the GreenFear agenda; yet, conveniently (for the GreenFear narrative to work) those scientists who challenge the 'it's all settled' meme are never glorified and raised to the hallowed status of being 'muzzled'- those scientists are immediately shamed, denigrated, and branded as "deniers" - that other gem of a meme beloved by the purveyors of Green Fascism, who are the true 'muzzlers' here. (see Tom Ferguson)

You see, it is only the GreenFear-pushers who can possibly be 'muzzled' {...do you see how the default bias works here?!}The GreenFear-pushers can be elevated to a hallowed status as 'Victims Of Scientific Suppression' in the 'War On Science' - they are nothing less then glorious green martyrs, you see; but - if you do not subscribe to the "it's all settled" GreenFear fascist mantra, you are not a martyr; you are not deemed a Victim Of Scientific Suppression - you are labelled a 'denier' - as Time hack Eric Polley does in his Feb.16, 2017 fake news story "Climate change denial is the original fake news" .

Eric Polley, of course, can't be bothered to show any evidence of AGW (...that's never the point though, is it?!) - he just professionally peddles the GreenFear agenda.

Time shouldbe ashamed to peddle such one-sided nonsense, but they're not by far the only ones slickly suppressing science by skewering 'deniers' while skewing the facts - The Atlantic happily threw a couple of punches too, publishing Meehan Crist's Feb.10, 2017 story "How the new climate denial is like the old climate denial", without actually providing ANY evidence to support the AGW premise, which they claim is being 'denied'!In a classic case of projection and deflection, Crist, Polley and their editors are themselves the deniers, denying the reality of their own false AGW premise. (Yikes: paradign shift alert!! Hypocrisy alert!!)Their 'real' premise is the false GreenFear-premise: that AGW is 'all settled'; that's their unquestioned jumping off point. (Like drones chattering in their echo chambers, GreenFear-pushing climatalarmists seem to miss the irony that Crist's article is exactly the kind of article which Polley sneers about!)

It's all rather a convenient political construct, isn't it?!

Have a look at Terence Corcoran's insightful column "Canadian finds polar bears are doing fine — and gets climate-mauled" (National Post, Dec. 7, 2017) on how climatalarmists attack those who question their "it's all settled' claims:

" We take you now deep out onto the frozen floes of Arctic science and polar bears, where the most dangerous threat known to man and bear alike is lurking among the icebergs: Junk science.

As a starting point, we look to a story published December 1st on Vice News’s tech site, Motherboard, that included an interview with U.S. polar bear scientist/activist Stephen Amstrup. In the article, Amstrup accuses Canadian polar bear scientist Susan Crockford of filling her bear research with extreme allegations. Climate activists have targeted Crockford, a zoologist and adjunct professor of anthropology at the University of Victoria, because her research inconveniently finds that, despite their claims, polar bears are not at risk. “You don’t have to read far in her material to see that it is full of unsubstantiated statements and personal attacks on scientists, using names like eco-terrorists, fraudsters, green terrorists and scammers,” Amstrup claimed.

A few days later, Motherboard published a slithery retraction. After Crockford complained that Amstrup’s comments about her were “a lie” and that she has never used such terms, Amstrup “clarified” his comments. He said that when he accused Crockford of calling scientists fraudsters, he really meant to accuse “climate deniers as a whole, rather than Crockford in particular.”

Ah, well, mix-ups like wrongly accusing a scientist of slanderous language are the kind of things that can happen given the context. It’s all part of an escalating epic of polar bear junk science. It begins with a paper in which Amstrup, who heads the activist group Polar Bears International, and other climate scientists — including famed temperature hockey-stick maker Michael Mann — produce what must be one of the most pathetic scientific smear jobs in the already sorry history of climate change science smear campaigns. Also along for the hatchet job was Stephan Lewandowsky, an Australian psychologist who asserts that people who have doubts about climate policy are wacky conspiracy theorists who would also tend to believe the 1969 moon landing was faked. Motherboard published a slithery retraction

In their new paper published November 29th, in the journal BioScience, Mann, Lewandowsky, Amstrup and a dozen other authors, headed by Jeffrey Harvey of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology, attack Crockford as an unqualified climate “denier.”

Crockford is fighting back. On Wednesday, she demanded that BioScience retract the paper. She describes it, in part, as “simply malicious, and an egregious breach of professional ethics” and filled with “untrue statements.”

The sole personal target of the BioScience paper is Crockford. Crockford has written books on polar bears for children and adults (such as Polar Bears: Outstanding Survivors of Climate Change) and runs Polar Bear Science, a blog site that for years has drilled holes in many of the claims and predictions of mainstream climate scientists. One recent post showed that polar bear populations around Churchill, Man. were in good shape, amid lots of sea ice. Another recent item said Amstrup’s claims of sea-ice loss were inaccurate.

Climate scientists in the Amstrup/Mann/Lewandowsky camp have apparently had enough of Crockford’s steady debunking of many of their polar bear alarmist claims and have set out to destroy her and her reputation via what can only be called a vicious personal attack." in a new paper published November 29th, in the journal BioScience, Mann, Lewandowsky, Amstrup and a dozen other authors, headed by Jeffrey Harvey of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology, attack Crockford as an unqualified climate “denier.” ..."

If anyone, it is the media (playing offense as usual for their leftist political agenda) which continues to protect their favourite politicians (and therefore their socialist policies) from scrutiny.

Take at look at Martin Regg Cohn's sly worship to Green bolshevism, not surprisingly, printed in the Toronto Star and its drone propagation outlets, such as the Windsor Star, Feb.16, 2017. It takes a propagandist's skill to pen a supposed 'critique' which in fact is a lament that Liberal GreenFear Bolshevism doesn't gofar enough!

Like Polley and Crist,Cohn purposefully fails to provide any specific evidence for AGW - but again: that's not the point, is it, to question the premise of AGW?! The point is to continue propagating the GreenFear hoax, without questioning the premise! {You know: just the way it works in Canada with hundreds of Cagey Climatologist interviews!}

Cohn dutifully skips over any mention of the premise of 'man-made global warming/climate change', as he shills for policies which are solely based on that premise! The GreenFear hoax must be taken as a given - the rule is "it's all settled, don't you dare ask questions", and so the media stories are built upon that premise.

It is the media itself, which is muzzling science by propagating the phony GreenFear agenda, and demonizing anyone who dares challenge the underpinnings of this socialist fabrication.

Think about it, they themselves are the muzzlers of science... they {...the 'free' press..!} self-muzzle scrutiny of the GreenFear lie, while themselves muzzling those who actually challenge the AGW premise. (Let's nominate Martin Regg Cohn and Eric Polley into Polley's own Climate Change Hoaxter's Hall of GreenFear-Peddling Shame, along with 'bright' lights such as Jim Bradley and the entire Ontario Liberal government, David Suzuki, Al Gore, Turdo and his Liberal Greensheviks in Ottawa... )

It's an Orwellian deception enabled here by the media, where the real muzzlers deflect their own complicity in a meme designed to blame others for 'muzzling science'!!!

You see this all the time in the St. Catharines Phony Standard (...look at the sickening GreenFear-mongering spewed by Liberal Climate-Fraud-Conman Glen Murray, Ontario's Chief Climate-Change Liar, in the Feb.15, 2017 Standard...); look on the CBC, Toronto Star, Globe and Mail, Huffington Post, Time, McLean's etc - the prevalent GreenFear-based climate-change lie is peddled on a daily basis, while its validity - and therefore, the validity of those political policies which are based on the AGW climate lie - are purposefully not questioned; the premise is never scrutinized.

I mean, who wants to believe that climate-change fraudsters such as Justin Trudeau will be flying to sign phony 'climate agreements' in Paris, agreements which are phony promises based on phony premises which have no scientific substance?!

(... this is same smarmy Justin Trudeau, who believes the climate-change AGW fairy tale is "a fact", who officially met with Donald Trump in Washington (on Feb.13, 2017) and who nevertheless, muzzled himself to avoid mentioning climate change! What a phony true believer!)

Stephen Capozzola wrote:

"For those who follow the heated squabbling of climate alarmists and skeptics, this has been a bombshell week. John Bates, a recently retired scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), has revealed that a 2015 study by the government agency was riddled with bias and questionable methodology.

More specifically, NOAA released a study in 2015 announcing that we haven’t had a “pause” in global warming over the past 15 years. Although the study flatly contradicted data from satellites and weather balloons documenting a net flatlining of temperatures, its findings were cited prominently at the 2015 Paris climate talks. The resulting Paris accord called for major decarbonization efforts worldwide.

According to Bates, the “pausebuster” study, led by former NOAA Director Thomas Karl, was rushed to publication before underlying data issues were resolved. Bates says that Karl was “insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximized warming and minimized documentation.”

It’s interesting that the Obama administration rushed to embrace the Karl study, though, since a subsequent paper in Nature Magazine disagreed with the NOAA report, saying the observed “slowdown” in warming is real, and occurred at a time when carbon dioxide emissions have been rising steadily.

Even the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has stated that “the rate of warming over the past 15 years … is smaller than the rate calculated since 1951.”

Subsequent rumblings about possible bias at NOAA prompted Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) to investigate the matter in 2016, earning the veteran congressman considerable criticism. In taking on NOAA, Smith was accused of being "anti-science" and trying to "intimidate" the scientific community. The U.K.'s Guardian even referred to him as a "witch hunter."

Now, however, it looks like Smith was absolutely right to question whether taxpayer money was used in a dubious manner.

It's significant that satellite and weather balloon readings of global temperatures have steadily borne out observations that net temperatures have remained relatively stable since the start of the 21st century. However, NOAA said that its 2015 study used "significant improvements in the calculation of trends" to assemble "improved versions of both sea surface temperature and land surface air temperature datasets."

But NOAA engaged in two very questionable practices in order to arrive at their new and improved graph of temperatures. They included seawater temperature measurements collected from the engine intake valves of ocean-going vessels, and they estimated Arctic Ocean temperatures by extrapolating from nearby land areas.

The result? When compared to satellite and weather balloon data, their "new" findings eliminated the net flatlining of 21st century global temperatures and instead showed a series of scraggly rising temperature lines.

Essentially, NOAA wanted the American people to believe that eliminating satellite data, while including readings from engine thermometers, would yield a more accurate temperature record. For the casual observer, all of this might seem plausible. But clearly NOAA engaged in a questionable methodology.

Most notably, thermometers installed in the intake valves of ocean-going vessels aren't intended for such precise measurements of temperature. This becomes all the more apparent when one considers, for example, that 2016 was declared the "hottest year on record" by a mere 0.01 degrees Celsius.

But there's also the possibility of "heat contamination" from the ships themselves. Seawater intake valves also pose a big problem, as well. They vary in depth according to the size and shape of a vessel's hull — presenting a problem for collecting samples of uniform depth.

Interestingly, NOAA gave priority to these ship readings. As one of the report's authors explained, "[D]ata collected from buoys are cooler than ship-based data. In order to accurately compare ship measurements and buoy measurements over the long-term, they need to be compatible. Scientists have developed a method to correct the difference between ship and buoy measurements, and we are using this in our trend analysis."

How exactly did NOAA adjust for this discrepancy? They added 0.12 degrees Celsius (0.25°F) to each buoy to bring their measurements in line with readings taken from ship gauges.

It's somewhat amusing to look at NOAA's website, though, and see their justification for using engine intake readings. Essentially, they portray such measurements as a step forward in scientific progress, thanks to the "change from ships throwing a bucket over the side, bringing some ocean water on deck, and putting a thermometer in it, to reading the thermometer in the engine coolant water intake."

But NOAA took another liberty, as well. They decided to estimate Arctic Ocean temperatures based on neighboring land areas. Simply put, there are only a limited number of temperature monitoring stations in the Arctic.

As such, NOAA simply extrapolated Arctic Ocean temperatures from neighboring land-based measurements. However, much of the Arctic Ocean can remain ice-covered throughout the summer, and imposing warmer land surface data on areas of sea ice will inevitably skew temperature readings.

But this is what NOAA undertook in order to make the case for concerted worldwide action against fossil fuel use. And while many climate-watchers had suspicions about the validity of NOAA's approach, it took Bates' revelations to help confirm the bias that drove their findings.

One has to wonder why, if the case for man-made warming is so tenuous, would alarmists resort to such questionable methods? Wouldn't the more obvious recourse be to question the hypothesis itself? But such is the state of the contemporary global warming debate. Hundreds of advocacy groups are engaged in an all-out campaign to certify the premise of anthropogenic warming.

Will any media outlet ask Justin Trudeau or Jim Bradley or Glen Murray or Chris Bittle about any of this? These Liberal clowns propagate the climate-change lie every day they are in office.

And, far be it for any reporter in Canada to ask Canada's Senior Cagey Climatologist (...or is he a Cagey Climatalarmogist...!?!) David Phillips for his comments on the phony basis of the Paris climate accords and Canada's labyrinth of cap and trade schemes - what's that got to do with climate change - right?!

The GreenFear-mongering insinuation that this was all due to 'climate change', was palpably present in Spiteri's piece, as Cagey Dave told Spiteri how

“These records go back to 1901. It’s hard to break a record when you’ve got over 100 years of records. I think (Thursday) could very well be (a record), especially if we get a little bit more sun than the fog that we’ve seen in some parts of southern Ontario.”

Phillips said he doesn’t recall such a sustained stretch of warm weather in February such as this year. “I don’t think there’s been a warmer week in February. What’s so interesting about this heat wave in February is that it is so persistent. You often will get one or two days where spring has arrived, and then you’re back into the cold winter weather. This has gone on. It went from (last) Saturday to this coming) Saturday"

'David, regarding this '100-yr-old record breaking February temperature' which you just mentioned, is this definitive evidence of man made climate change, the kind that Liberals such as Justin Trudeau and Jim Bradley say it is?

David, you make all this innuendo about hundred year records being broken, but as Canada's Senior Climatologist, what do these records have to do with AGW climate change?

David, when you say to me “I don’t think there’s been a warmer week in February",are you specifically referring to the period from 1901 to Feb. 2017? Could there have been a warmer February week anytime earlier, say, oh... in the last 10,000 years? And, why is it that you "don't think there's been a warmer week in February" - don't you know these things for sure, before you say them?

Either it has been 'the warmest February week since 1901', or it hasn't - why allude to this, if you don't know? Do you want me to sensationalize the story, and spike it with GreenFear?'

Sadly, Spiteri sold himself out as a journalist and simply danced the tired old Cagey Two Step Tango with David Phillips. Spiteri did NOT ask any questions, just lapped up David Phillips' sputum and regurgitated it in the St. Catharines Standard and in the Review.'

CHAPTER 13

Spiteri's Tango With Cagey (...as mentioned in Chapter 12 above)appeared on Feb.22, 2017, so it was amusing to see that only a week later (on Mar.1, 2017) Cagey was involved in yet another typical GreenFear-laced piece, where he was basically spouting similar things as he had spouted to Spiteri - but in this case, the reporter actually did try to ask if all this warmth in Feb.2017 was climate change. This is what Spiteri and literally hundreds of previous Canadian reporters failed to do.

So who was this supposedly 'heroic' reporter? It was Kate McGillivray, who reported this being asked in her CBC article (Mar.1, 2017): (Yes, this was in the CBC!! But, looking at the story in the link, it isn't even clear if McGillivray actually interviewed Cagey herself, or, was she reporting a second-hand story here, based on some other interviewer on Metro Morning... was it her or someone else doing the interview?? I am taking it here that McGillivray was Cagey's interviewer. If it was someone else, than the same comments apply to whoever it was that actually did this Cagey interview.)

"So long, normal weather: Toronto just had the warmest February on record

Expect the unexpected and get used to temperature swings, says climatologist Dave Phillips

It's official — Toronto just lived through the warmest February in at least 80 years, says Dave Phillips, senior climatologist at Environment Canada.

"It also had the warmest February temperature ever, up to 17.7 C on the 23rd," which broke records going back to the 1840s, he told CBC Radio's Metro Morning.

The month didn't start off this way.

""We had temperatures at -12 C," said Phillips. "We had a month's worth of snow in the first ten days."

After that, the jet stream, a narrow band of strong wind, moved "almost into a summer position, well north of us in Northern Ontario. It allowed the warm air to just flood into Southern Ontario," he said.

All that warm air led to 12 days in a row with melting record temperatures. "So clearly, the look and the feel of winter disappeared in February," Phillips said.

Enjoying the weather, worrying about the climate

So are February's unseasonably warm temperatures a sure sign of climate change?

"I'm reluctant to always go there," said Phillips.

He said that it's the wild swings over the last few years, the absence of "normal weather," that is more of a tip-off.

"We had the coldest February on record two winters ago, here we have the warmest. That back-and-forth, up-and-down is more a mark that something is happening to our climate," he said.

"We say, 'Enjoy the weather but be concerned about the climate.'"

Amazing: some CBC reporter/interviewer asks Canada's Cagey Climatologist whether the Feb. warm weather is a sure sign of climate change, and Cagey cagily answers that he is "reluctant to always go there"!! Whaaaaat??! He ominously rattles off fearsome temperature records being broken, citing scary "wild swings", declaring that this all due to the absence of "normal weather". That fearmongering is meant to be taken, unquestioningly, at face value - the cagey unspoken insinuation is prepared and provided for us to jump to a conflated conclusion that this must therefore all be due to man-made climate change. The GreenFear link is pre-engineered for our unquestioning consumption, prepared by both Cagey and the CBC, without any evidence that anything here is linked to AGW. The illusion and the insinuation and the scary spin is meant to confuse, and to suggest that the only possible cause is AGW.

There is an interesting interplay here, in this slick GreenFear piece, but make no mistake about it: this is still CBC fake news GreenFear propaganda, even though Kate McGillivray (or whoever the mystery interviewer was) tepidly did "go there" with Cagey.

(...and compare Cagey's caginess in NOT "going there" about climate change with the CBC, to the fact that Cagey had gone there, when he held a lecture at the Nottawasaga Conservation Valley Authority on Jan.30, 2017 claiming that "climate change is the here and now" - - - yet, what does that even mean? !? It's simply cagey innuendo! That's not scientific terminology: that's just Cagey's homey blatant PR sloganeering rhetoric. The CBC (in McGillivray's Mar. 1, 2017 story) could have done their homework and actually asked Cagey to comment on his previous comments about climate change, which he's made to others (...such as those he made to the NCVA, just a month earlier, on Jan.30, 2017). I mean, we all know that's EXACTLY what the CBC would have done, if it was some conservative politician they were trying to slime - the CBC interviewer/attacker and the CBC research department would have had everything the target had previously said - - but, oh well, with Cagey, they just let it slide...)

Keep in mind that McGillivray's piece (and the Metro Morning piece, if it was by someone other than McGillivray) is nevertheless an orchestrated CBC event spun, processed, and presented to further the GreenFear-mongering agenda, scary headlines, innuendo, and all. The focus was on fanning climate fear, and definitely not on scrutinizing why David Phillips cannot "go there" and provide evidence of AGW.

The CBC's editors well know how to orchestrate the Cagey Tango, telling half the story (...actually way less than half of the story; more like lying by omission) -- most of the real story is what the CBC left out, such as specifically providing interviews from any GreenFear-bloviating Canadian Liberal, dipper, or greenie, asking them if the weather events which Cagey talks about (...but which he cagily refuses to confirm as AGW!!!!) are in fact evidence of climate change.

Climatalarmists such as Jim Bradley, Justin Trudeau, Glen Murray, and Elizabeth May peddle the GreenFear-lie every day the exhale carbon dioxide. Where's their reaction to Canada's Senior Climatologist coyly demurring to confirm 'evidence' of AGW - the AGW upon which they base their GreenFear Bolshevik policies upon??

Where's the leftists' phony "science is being suppressed" meme now, when Canada's Senior Climatologist muzzles himself (...under J-Turd's Liberal watch, no less..!)and refuses "to go there"; to publicly state to the aroused and panting press that the weather events he reports are evidence of AGW?!!

The CBC has spent untold millions of tax dollars over the years, helping peddle the GreenFear lie that man has created the climate - and the CBC will continue to do so, regardless of what Cagey said in that Mar 1 CBC report! They will continue to peddle GreenFear, and will make sure that Cagey's comments aren't mentioned - they {...ahem... not 'Harper'...} will suppress what Cagey said. (...The CBC, predictably, did exactly that, continuing their GreenFear-laced climate fascism only 4 days after Kate McGillivray's report, where NO MENTION at all was made of Cagey Dave's inability/refusal to show evidence of "climate change" - seeChapter 15 further below...)

They will muzzle Cagey's comments.

They will continue to peddle the phony "it's all settled" meme.

They will censor their future GreenFear-mongering to purposefully not mention David Phillips' climate skepticism, which he demonstrated in McGillivray's CBC report on Mar.1, 2017.

So where's the backlash when Canada's Senior Climatologist REFUSES to agree with the CBC narrative? Where are the instant mass denunciations of Cagey as a 'Denier', as an 'Uncle Tom Of Science', as a 'Traitor To The Planet'... .... ...?

Funny eh?

For years, the left happily chortled and regurgitated the meme that scientists such as Good Ole Cagey were somehow "muzzled" when it came to climate change. Cagey was treated as some kind of a 'subversive' hero, as some kind of martyr, cleverly sending us coded messages of climate change while he was being 'suppressed', which the left hungrily ate up.

Everything Cagey said - even still here, in McGillivray's own Mar.1, 2017 article! - was still spun to reflect the gospel of AGW.

The CBC's McGillivray had a chance in her report to examine, but she completely ignored, the 'suppression' meme (...a meme which her own CBC had happily peddled).

When Cagey answered that he was "reluctant to always go there" reporter McGillivray could have explored this, to ask:

'Why? Why is David Phillips 'reluctant to go there'?? Go 'where', exactly? Why can't he just prove climate change, when we're all told that the 'science is settled'?? Is he being suppressed by anyone? Is someone preventing Phillips from linking the warm Feb 2017 weather as being evidence of man made climate change? If records are being broken, as Phillips is saying, then why can't he admit that it is evidence of climate change?'

McGillivray and her CBC editors cleverly did NOT bring up the point that David Phillips could not give them their desired 'climate change is real' money shot!

They did not bring up the point - when Phillips didn't deliver the 'climate-change evidence' in the past - that it was at that time all blamed on the phony meme that Phillips was 'muzzled by Harper'. {....Y'see how the propaganda works..?!} Yet - now that Turdo is in power...... and now that Cagey works at Turdo's frickin' phony 'Ministry of Climate Change'...... and now that Cagey is (supposedly) un-muzzled, and is no longer "suppressed"... ...the CBC IGNORES analyzing this incongruous set of circumstances... as well as their own role in propagating it!Y'see the CBC's self-serving spin now?! The old narrative was that scientists such as Cagey were only 'muzzled by Harper'; yet when Cagey refuses to confirm AGW now, under Trudeau, no similar link is being made to Trudeau!! Aren't dem CBC climate commies clever, eh?!

Where's the bombastic vitriol to Cagey's refusal, from the man-made climate-change hoaxters such as Jim Bradley or Justin Trudeau, or Catherine McKenna, or Kathleen Wynne...?

In 2016, Jim Bradley's Ontario Liberals, practicing Newspeak, renamed their Environment Ministry to become the "Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change". In 2015, the Turdo federal Liberals renamed Environment Canada (where Cagey peddles his cagey climate business) to the "Ministry of Environment and Climate Change".

Turdo stated that "climate change is a fact" - yet, Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips {who works at Turdo's Ministry of Climate Change...!!!} CANNOT or WILL NOT 'go there' to actually confirm this "fact"!!

And furthermore, the CBC refused to follow up on the discrepancy - and this is a glaring discrepancy, going to the heart of the AGW man-made climate-change change issue.

Were McGillivray nor any other CBC hack prepared with any follow-up questions?

The usual narrative from the AGW GreenFear-pushing warmists includes a litany of attacks on anyone who dares to even profess climate change skepticism - they are immediately slapped down, tarred and feathered as "deniers". We all know and have all seen this kind of typically reflexive leftist trope. The disgusting David Suzuki demonized 'deniers' and wanted them put in jail.

Strangely, Cagey is allowed to remain in his conveniently fuzzy, grey, slippery, shifty, amorphous, nebulous climate change zone, UNABLE to confirm to the CBC that what he's saying is (or isn't) climate change.

McGillivray could have asked (...but didn't) in her article:

'Hey David - you work at Canada's freakin' Ministry of Climate Change - - why can't you do us a solid and confirm once and for all that climate-change - specifically AGW man-made climate change - is real, for f@!* sake??? C'mon, David - Turdo pays yer wages; why don't you confirm that man-made climate-change is real??? What's stoppin' ya from agreeing with Suzuki and Stephane Dion??? '

McGillivray's CBC story is such a Green-Fear laden piece of crap, that the narrative was purposefully shifted NOT to trumpet a headline that more accurately reflects the real issue: "Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips refuses to confirm climate change" should have been the actual headline, as THAT was the real story.(Maybe someone should re-interview Cagey's pal Good Ole Phil Chadwick, for his reaction to Cagey again refusing to provide evidence of AGW - even though Cagey isn't being suppressed by anyone...!)

McGillivray's story was spun to emphasize the GreenFear angle. McGillivray could have explored (...but didn't)the long arc of the climate change lie. McGillivray could spend several years documenting all the past hysterical climate-change GreenFear-mongering perpetrated by HER OWN CBC colleagues. But she won't.

She didn't even ask Cagey about his citations, such as 80 year old records apparently being broken, dating back to the 1840's. Even that glib math fails to prompt McGillivray . {1840 to 2017 is 80 years?? Who knew?} McGillivray just lets this stuff slide!! When Cagey was spouting his weather record citations to Spiteri - only one week ago!!!!!! - he was claiming that hundred year old records were being broken, going back (supposedly) to 1901. Yet in Toronto, Cagey tells McGillivray 'records' were being 'broken going back to the 1840's'. This is the kind of slippery "science" that constitutes evidence of AGW? Sad.

CHAPTER 14

...Moving right along, right on the tail of Cagey's Mar.1, 2017 refusal to confirm AGW to the CBC's McGillivray, let's look at what the GreenFear-hoax-pushers were peddling at the Toronto Star, with Olivia Ward's Mar.3, 2017 GreenFear-propaganda piece - published just 2 days after Canada's Senior Climatologist refused to provide or confirm any evidence of man-made climate change to the CBC...!

Funny, somehow Ward and the entire Toronto Star editorial staff conveniently weren't aware of David Phillips' studied silence on climate change...! Didn't they know about David Phillips's episode with the CBC's McGillivray two days earlier??

Propagandists, such as the Star's Olivia Ward, continue their biased, GreenFear-mongering campaign non-stop (...giddily reportingoops propagandizing, without question, how ""All life on earth now depends on maintaining efforts in environmental and related sciences,” says an open letter from scientists calling on Canada to protect science under threat from Trump" !!! (haha), thereby again trotting out the 'scientists are being muzzled' meme - (now blaming Trump) while David Phillips' (unmuzzled!) comments from 2 days ago - in Turdopian Canada - are purposefully buried and forgotten - as if they never happened.

It's a sick spiral of cognitive impairment with these deluded Green Bolsheviks.

Here we see the Star lying about their role in peddling fake news, when they have been portraying a biased position (a political position, not a scientific position; ie peddling the hoax that 'the science is settled', and trumpeting political propaganda disguised as 'proof' of AGW'. Kathy English ranks up there with Goebbels in the propaganda department.

(... and despite their phony claims, FaceBook / Google aren't stopping the peddling of the kind of GreenFear which the Star peddles...! Google News happily publishes 'climate change is man made' science fiction on a daily basis, disguising these fake stories as "news" classed under 'science', instead of where they belong - in a hybrid 'science fiction' fake news category, where fake-science morphs into real political-propaganda. You know: the same pseudo-science that Ontario Liberals, such as Jim Bradley, peddle and practice.)

You have to wonder if the Star's Olivia Ward (in her Mar.3, 2017 Fake News article) had even read her own Toronto Star colleague Kathy English's Feb.17, 2017 fake story on fake news?!?(Ward's article came out less than 3 weeks after English's, so Ward ought to be aware of it, it's not ancient history!)

Ward would have (or should have!) seen her Star colleague English's mighty attempt to provide her slanted Atkinsonian definition of Fake News, to justify how the Star cannot possibly be publishing phony articles!!English writes:

"So, what is fake news?

To answer that accurately, we must look to Craig Silverman the Canadian journalist who first wrote about the phenomena of fake news for BuzzFeed News in November. Silverman, who has achieved global recognition for this important work, exposed the reality of fraudulent news, deliberately created and shared, largely on Facebook, to gain advertising dollars. Much of what he discovered was pro-Trump fake news that cast his opponent, Hillary Clinton, in a negative light with clearly false information.

Silverman’s reporting provided a fascinating look into the digital media universe and the ease with which wholly made-up “news” could be spread – and seemingly, believed. This “ecosystem” of fabricated information presented as serious news continues to be a significant concern in discerning the credibility of news sources..."

It's quite sickening to see English use Silverman's views as justification that the Toronto Star is not a fake news peddler, when what he writes definitely would include the Star's own peddling of its slanted brand of fake news for clicks and for subscriptions!! Did Silverman ever examine the anti-Trump "news" spread by Tor Star?!? The Star editorializes its news, placing facts and events into their branded Atkinsonian slanted narrative. News and opinion and political propaganda meld, morph, and intertwine in various degrees from story to story; editorial stances permeate what should be news stories; news stories are fabricated to support editorial positions - - - but, this is nothing new, nor exclusive just to TorStar - so why the impassioned phony pretense by English that somehow the Star is as pure as the (man-made) snow?!

English is disingenuous to say the least, when, in an article about fake news, she just censors the starting point, that the Star is an inherently biased, Atkinsonian endeavor, that it is a fake 'fair' and fake 'balanced' organization; in other words, that there is no 'fairness' or 'balance' to be expected. We expect leftist garbage from the Toronto Star - that is their inherent essence. English can't bring herself to acknowledge how the Star's basic organizational tenet infects and seeps into everything they do. There is an ideological political agenda at the Star, and stories are editorially engineered, spun and processed to reflect their biased Atkinsonian narrative.(The Toronto Star frequently and eagerly prints phony 'news' about Donald Trump ...like Eric Tucker's unsubstantiated AP story, published by Tor Star on May 15, 2017 about Trump asking Comey for loyalty...! - yet Kathy English continues to prattle on about how the Toronto Star doesn't make things up!

Political opinion is substituted for and presented as "news" - it's a massive bait and switch, where "sources" are secret, and where opinion - salted with insinuation and innuendo - morphs into 'news'. The Star's role is to massage and amplify their politicized brand of 'the news'. English knowingly peddles a fake narrative - as if her organization does NOT peddle biased, processed political opinion, disguised as 'straight facts'!!! (Is the irony lost on her, that the article is ostensibly about fake news?! Or is she so deeply embedded in 'principled' Atkinsonian assholery that she cannot see the irony?! That is tragic. Or, is it that she does see the irony, does see her own disconnect, does see her own discrepancy and hypocrisy - and yet, coldly doesn't give a shit, and peddles the lie anyway?? That's fanaticism.)

All we have to do is look at Olivia Ward's fawningly fakey article (appearing only 3 weeks after English's) to see how fake English's denials of the Star's propensity for fakeness are!!!They keep on doing it, while denying it - is this a genetic compulsion, that they just can't help it; that they can only function in their own bias, in their own comfortable paradigms?

English would like us all believe in her own partisan alt-left hallucination, that fake news can ONLY come from the scary right, not from socialists. Now, let's get back to reality and continue to document the GreenFear climate change lies peddled by the 'non-biased' hahaha Toronto Star over the years.

Kathy English can help demonstrate how full of umm ...non-fake news the Toronto Star is, by getting her Star colleague Olivia Ward to contact David Phillips (Canada's Senior Climatologist) to get his reaction to the GreenFear crap-laden story which Ward wrote on Mar.3, 2017. Why was Phillips omitted from Ward's own story?

Kathy English claims that the Toronto Star would never deliberately publish false information:" I have yet to see any validity in any of the “fake news” charges lobbed our way. While it should go without saying, I think it’s safe to say, the Toronto Star is not in the business of fake news. While this news organization’s work does sometimes fall short of its own journalistic standards, to suggest that the Star woulddeliberately publish false information is wrong. We don’t make stuff up.And, that’s a fact."

So here we are at the heart of the issue: the Star does make things up, but doesn't see it that way. They manufacture stories embedded with their corporatist Atkinsonian narrative. English slyly hazes over and conflates the Star's rare 'straight, factual news reports' with the Star's much more common 'newspinion' pieces, where biased Star reporter/propagandists clearly push a political agenda; where the headlines are consistently spiked, biased, or deceptive; where other related opinions and contexts are conveniently and deliberately edited (censored) to further the biased Atkinsonian narrative. {This was clearly demonstrated (as was documented in Chapter 3) by Amy Dempsey's GreenStink in the Jan.17, 2017 Toronto Star - a month before Kathy English's fakey defense of TorStar fake news!!}

Kathy English claims "we don't make stuff up", but the Star's Atkinsonian narrative belies that phony claim. Amy Dempsey's GreenStink belies English's claim: and let's remember that Dempsey wrote her Star story a month before English's phony apologist piece was published. Then, just 3 weeks after English's piece was published, the same Star garbage appeared with Olivia Ward's GreenStink-laden story, where strangely, Environment Canada's Senior Climatologist (...who coyly would not confirm climate change 2 days earlier on the CBC!) was NOT interviewed. The Star purposefully spins, censors and omits - yet, hey, they don't make stuff up! They just want you to believe their manufactured version!

You'd think that of all the people in Canada, Ole Cagey Dave would have had something relevant to say to Olivia Ward about 'muzzling scientists' and about 'global warming/climate change'!!!So why did the Toronto Star NOT ASK Phillips to comment on those very issues?!Look, for Gaia's sake: the Toronto Star just muzzled David Phillips, while claiming they don't do fake news! Trump didn't do that: the Toronto Star did.It's amazing. The Star consistently prints climate change stories as "news", which are based on the AGW GreenFear hoax.

What English and Toronto Star are doing here, is so insidious, it really is beyond 'lying', or 'fake news', it's Orwellian in scope.

CHAPTER 15

Following Kate McGillivray's Mar. 1, 2017 CBC article (detailed in Chapter 13 above) where Environment Canada's Senior Climatologist refused to link his weather reports as evidence of climate change, the CBC ran another story 3 days later (written by Maryse Zeidler, Mar.5, 2017)with this typically GreenFearsome fascist headline" "20 years ago, B.C. scientists warned of provincial impact of climate change'Being able to talk about climate change outside of the science world, that continues to be a real challenge'".

The CBC's Zeidler trots out Stewart Cohen, referred to as a "senior climate change researcher with Environment Canada", yet Zeidler suppresses any mention of Environment Canada's David Phillips in her story, and doesn't bother to ask Cohen to comment on EC's Senior Climatologist Phillips refusing to link weather to "climate change"..! The CBC's GreenGoebbels certainly work at a feverish pace to peddle their propaganda. Has Cagey already been greenwashed out of favour by the CBC's climate fascists?? Wow. (ya better repent now Cagey...)Who is preventing anyone from "being able to talk about climate change", as the headline on Zeidler's story ominously suggests??! (...as if the media themselves aren't the ones who immediately attack and shame anyone who challenges the 'it's all settled' hoax...) Zeidler never bothers to ask her subjects about that claim; the dark insinuation is just left to hang there without question. It's enough for the CBC just to print the claim, without delving into messy details which spoil the overall effect of the desired GreenFear narrative. That's not reporting; it's biased, scripted stenography - it's propaganda. Here's the same old 'science is being suppressed' meme being slickly, subtlety - subliminally - peddled, without substance. We are just supposed to "know" that these poor old scientists are being somehow suppressed... by someone.... y'see... Not once did the CBC's Zeidler bother to actually provide, nor ask for, any evidence of man made climate change - her starting off point, as we see, takes for granted that 'the science of man made climate is settled' - therefore, all the subsequent propaganda flows from that faulty premise.

How can the CBC be peddling 'fake climate news', eh?! Well, if they do not question the premise, and 'believe' it to be 'real', and continuously peddle their stories under that supposition, to them it's all 'real' and cannot be fake. After all, no TorStar or CBC reporter has been threatened to be jailed by David Suzuki, so, really, how fakey can the their science-fictiony false global warming stories possibly be!?! Yes, there is some kind of perverted, demented 'logic' in the Green Bolshevik mind - ya can't blame us: we think/we believe/we trust/we don't even ask if it's real - - - it can't be fake if we thought it was real, y'see? We was just tellin' ya, what our (selective) impressions were, of what we were (selectively) told by the (selected) people who fit our (selective) narrative!!

There is no need for CBC or TorStar reporters to actually question anyone about the AGW premise; their task is to propagate AGW and amplify it, as if it was real.

And if it means censoring David Phillips - while still claiming science is being censored {!!!} well, so be it - climate fascism MUST march on at all costs. It's as if what David Phillips had said just 3 days earlier... (...to the CBC's McGillivray on Mar.1, 2017 {see Chapter 13} - which was not what the CBC had actually wanted nor expected him to say...)... wasn't relevant to Zeidler's report!! Is Zeidler's report the first act of the shaming of David Phillips, who sinned and refused to bow to the GreenFear-peddlers' demands??

Zeidler didn't bother to ask Stewart Cohen to provide all the data from Environment Canada, which 'proves' AGW. Zeidler could have asked for that, and could have listed all the citations which Cohen and Environment Canada have, which 'prove' AGW. But this typical CBC propagandist, disguised as a 'reporter', DID NOT do so, as the purpose of this CBC story was about creating a haze of GreenFear, not about reporting facts.

Zeidler purposefully didn't ask Cohen, to comment on his Environment Canada colleague David Phillips' refusal - made just 3 days earlier - to link weather to AGW. Why was that avenue not followed - what, the CBC in British Columbia doesn't know what Mother Corp. is peddling elsewhere across the nation??

I mean, Great Gaia's Ghost: Zeidler 's assignment was to peddle an illusion for us to believe that somehow in BC, they've had 'evidence of AGW' for 20 years doncha know - or so the narrative leads us to believe - yet, no actual AGW evidence was provided by anyone in Zeidler's report, from 20 years ago, or from now - of course, unless speculation is considered 'evidence'!

Zeidler could have easily even asked Ontario's Liberal Godfather Of GreenFear himself, Jim Bradley, about the existence of AGW evidence - - -Bradley has secretly had it, for some 30 years - maybe more, who knows..!) Why didn't Zeidler interview Bradley and ask him all about his 'decades' worth of 'AGW evidence' (which he's never revealed) and compare it to all the 'evidence of AGW' which we are led to believe in her report that Environment Canada has, and which (apparently!) everyone in B.C. knew about 20 years ago???

Zeidler was more than happy in her one-sided story to peddle Cohen's and "climate scientist" Trevor Murdock's views " ...Despite those advancements, both researchers say the biggest challenge on the climate change front has been trying to change public perception.

Cohen says it's frustrating to see people who still don't believe climate change is happening, or that greenhouse gas emissions have anything to do with it.

"Being able to talk about climate change outside of the science world, that continues to be a real challenge," he said.

"We need to figure out how to do that better and how to do that more continuously too."

As expected from the CBC, Zeidler obligingly did NOTHING to question them. If anything, we see that the CBC happily does "continuously" peddle GreenFear (which is exactly what Cohen wants) as if Zeidler was not sent by the CBC to do just that!!! Can't the "journalist" Zeidler see her own role aiding and abetting the propaganda she's peddling?

She WAS there, paid by the CBC, to peddle one side of the (false AGW) story, and she was there to "change public perception" to accept the AGW hoax (and therefore, to accept AGW-premised political policies). The entire episode is a fabricated piece of self-serving, echo-chamber propaganda.

If Zeidler had acted as an independently-minded actual journalist, rather than a GreenFear groupie, she could have said to Cohen: 'What the f*ck, man: I am here, and the CBC is giving you a soapbox to peddle your views - more than they give any other views - so don't f*cking patronize me, ok? Now, let's get to all that AGW 'evidence' you say you have from Environment Canada, which supposedly supports Catherine McKenna's Mar.9, 2017"Climate change is clear. It's man made" lie, and which supports Prime Minister Turdo's phony claim that "climate change is real"... ... ...'But, no, Zeidler wasn't there as an impartial reporter; she was there as a believer and as a willing participant in the GreenFear propaganda-peddling effort. Zeidler was there to do the typical boiler-plate Cagey-style tango (...the same old GreenFear tango, but without Cagey - who's been relegated to the Climate Change doghouse for the time being...)

Zeidler writes a story propagandizing and peddling GreenFear, interviewing her selected (and decidedly selective) subjects as if their views are somehow unknown or somehow being suppressed.... as if their kind of views HAD NEVER ALREADY BEEN CONTINUOUSLY PROPAGATED BY THE CBC ON A NATIONAL BASIS!!! The disconnect, the self-serving loop of propaganda, is astounding.

This CBC reporter GreenFear-monger had a chance to write a story examining the 'scientific evidence of AGW' and how this 'evidence' - politically portrayed as "being settled" - manifests in Canadian politics. Who stopped her from doing that?!? Instead, Zeidler earned her CBC paycheque by spinning GreenFear while never actually addressing the underlying premise of AGW. Great job.

CHAPTER 16

Speaking of the 'political manifestation of climate-change', on Apr. 29, 2017 we saw AGW-infected Niagara politicians such as Carlos Garcia and St.Catharines mayor Walter Sendzik immediately link spring flooding at Lakeside Park with climate change - with no AGW evidence provided, and with no questions asked by reporter Allan Benner!

These two GreenFear-mongering politicians "agreed that climate change is to blame for the problems.

“When someone says, ‘What does climate change look like, and what does it mean to a city like St. Catharines?’ This is what it means,” Sendzik said. “It means a higher rate of erosion on our shoreline, it means flooding in areas like Port Dalhousie and Lakeside Park, and it impacts the yacht club.”

So: what does GreenFear propaganda look like?! Look no further than Benner's biased 'report' about 2 smug local clowns peddling Al Gore's and Jim Bradley's climate-change-paranoia.

You'd think by reading this St.Catharines Standard crap, that the water levels in the Great Lakes watershed had never deviated in the last... oh... thousand years! ( Or, even since Jim Bradley was first elected!) There has never been any rate of erosion in the Great Lakes - until this week!! Apparently, prior to April of 2017, the entire Great Lakes ecosystem was always in a comfortable stasis, where nothing ever changed !

The Standard plants a biased half-story without the context; keeping the GreenFear propaganda alive a little longer, rehashing the phony narrative whenever possible - kudos all around for a great team effort of fake-newsmanship!

Compare mayor Sendzik's GreenFear-mongering on Apr.29th to this May 5 CBC story by Laurene Jardin (headlined "St. Lawrence River could rise if N.Y. request to lower Lake Ontario is approved") reporting New York State Governor Cuomo's request to open up the dam at Cornwall to drain off more of Lake Ontario's water.

This is completely relevant to the issue - yet, it's funny how Sendzik (the Agenda-21-infected mayor) never made any mention of any dam, nor its effect on the water levels in Port Dalhousie! The local yokels were left with the scary impression that this was all due to climate change.

And reporter Allan Benner didn't bother to ask about that, either (...remember: the point is to play up the false impression of AGW, not to question its false premise... to propagate the agenda by spiking the appearance over the substance.)

Jardin wrote:

"Jean Aubry-Morin, a Canadian member of the International Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Board, said it's a balancing act...

Aubry-Morin said that the board would take current water levels in Quebec into consideration before adding any water into the St. Lawrence.

Because of the snow melt and spring showers, the international board redistributes water into the appropriate body of water every year.

What's abnormal about this year, Aubry-Morin says is the amount of precipitation the provinces have seen in the last six weeks.

"It's a one-in-20-year situation," he said".

Yet, mayor Sendzik and councilor Garcia acted as if they'd never heard of any kind of 'once in a 20 yr situation' - to them, this was 'evidence' of drastic climate change (which probably in their minds, was also directly and personally caused by Donald Trump!)

No one in Benner's story mentioned the Cornwall dam's existence, let alone its purpose!
No one mentioned the dam's systemic effects, downstream and upstream, upon the Great Lakes-St.Lawrence watershed, and its effect locally, upon the beach at Lakeside Park!!!

And Benner didn't bother to ask about any of this, either.

It's interesting to note that in her story, CBC reporter Jardin did NOT make any of those expected, typical, obligatory, false-causation references to 'climate change'. That was an unexpected, refreshing move.

SO: now let's see what cagey ol' David Phillips saying about all this!!

"David Phillips, a senior climatologist with Environment Canada, said another factor adding to the problem is the repeated occurrence of storm systems over the last five weeks that didn't just come and go, but stuck around for days.

"They haven't been hit and run," he said. "They've had more time to linger and spread more of their misery. Instead of one day of rain, we're seeing maybe two or three days of rain from the same system."

April had 19 rainy days in total, Phillips said, and many of those days saw heavy amounts of rainfall.

"It was not just a drizzle, an inconvenience — it was a gully washer, like half a month worth of rain in one day," he said."

There goes Cagey again, with his oft-repeated, very scientific "gully-washer" rhetoric...

It's funny how the CBC reporter Stephen Smith - when he had the chance to do so - DID NOT BOTHER TO ASK David Phillips if the flooding along the Great Lakes confirms Al Gore's Inconvenient Truths about Climate Change.

Isn't THAT what every leftist infected with AGW wants to know?!?

They want confirmation from Environment Canada's TOP CLIMATOLOGIST that this flooding is caused by AGW!

They want to know that the Trudeau government's "it's real, it's all settled" climate change policy is based on science.

When David Phillips blurted to reporter Stephen Smith that "It was not just a drizzle, an inconvenience — it was a gully washer, like half a month worth of rain in one day", why didn't reporter Smith immediately ask if this gully-washer of rain was an example of 'climate change'??

Why ignore the obvious follow-up question??

Why didn't the CBC reporter Smith simply ASK Canada's Senior climatologist to directly confirm that all this flooding is due to AGW?

Isn't that a simple, straight-forward question for a reporter, after he's just been told by Canada's Senior Climatologist that a half-month's worth of rain fell in one day??

Wouldn't a reporter reasonably ask, following-up on Phillips' own gully-washing rhetoric: 'Mr. Phillips, you cite lots of rainfall - a half-month's worth of rain in one day... is that an example of man made climate change, Mr. Phillips?'

Why didn't the CBC reporter Smith follow-up on what Phillips said?

Even small town mayors are apparently convinced it's all due to climate change - so what is preventing BOTH Canada's top climatologist, and Canada's national broadcaster, from publicly providing what should be such a straightforward answer, to such a straightforward question??

Trudeau's Liberals (and those hacks never lie..) have told us that 'climate change is real'; so why does the CBC shirk from asking Environment Canada about confirming 'climate change'??

What prevented the CBC's Stephen Smith from asking David Phillips this question?

Let's ask (... yes.... again... ...):

- was David Phillips "muzzled" by anyone?!

- did anyone prevent or suppress David Phillips from answering such a question?!

- Is it beneath the dignity of David Phillips to be asked such a direct question?!

- did any one "muzzle" Stephen Smith (or any other CBC reporter, for that matter?!)

- did anyone prevent or suppress reporter Smith (or any other CBC reporter) from asking David Phillips to confirm that the flooding IS INDEED the direct result of AGW?!

- Is it beneath the dignity of any CBC reporter to directly ask Philips such a question?!?

{Great Gaia's Ghost: here we have Canada's Senior Climatologist spouting scientific jargon such as 'crap shoot' to conflate his weather/climate stances - yet, Canada's leftist press DARES NOT ask Liberal dolt Justin Turdo or Canada's Climate Barbie, Catherine McKenna, how it is, that the Liberals climate change policies are based on "crap-shoot" prognostications?!
Yep: that narrative is forbidden.
Better not to link Cagey to the Liberals' Agenda 21 plans...}

The CBC reporter Cote DID NOT BOTHER to ask climatologists Phillips, nor Ian Black (...described as "CBC's Ottawa climatologist"!! Wow: lookit that; is there a tax-payer-funded in-house CBC climatologist in every Canadian city??! Nice gig - no bias there, eh..?!) whether the weather that they are commenting on is due to man made climate change.

Cote DID make sure to actually use the words "climate change" in his story - because, well, Phillips works for the phonily-named ministry of "Environment And Climate Change Canada" - so, the subliminal hint in the story is there: 'gosh, it must be man made climate change, because that's the name of the place Cagey works for'!!

Cagey David might as well be working for "Wild-Card Dave's Emporium of Gully-Washing, Crap-Shooting Climatology", because David is strangely unable to provide Canadians with any evidence of man made climate change. (...How about that, eh, Phil Chadwick?! {see Chapter 3} Who's 'suppressing' David Phillips now, eh Phil?? What are "David's circumstances" now, Phil?!)

The CBC reporter Cote didn't bother asking David Phillips if all the "historically high water levels along the Ottawa River" (where Turdo's Liberals have now called in the ARMY to assist, no less) are a direct result of AGW.

Given these circumstances, why did reporter Cote refuse to ask Phillips the obvious question?

Is it not relevant to the situation?!! For years, the CBC has shilled the climate change hoax - why shirk now from attributing direct examples of it? Don't climatologists Phillips and Black have the credentials to recognize and confirm direct evidence of "climate change"?!

And CBC reporter Cote didn't even ask his own in-house-CBC-climatologist colleague Ian Black the same question.

One story, two climatologists - yet, NO QUESTIONS raised, nor any answers given, about 'climate change'!!

Why even bother with having both of these climatologists in the story anyway, if they will not touch the issue of climate change?

Were they even asked about it by reporter Cote?

Was anyone suppressing Paul Cote, or Ian Black, or David Phillips, stopping them from mentioning 'climate change'?! (... becausewe know that the tired old "science is being suppressed" meme would immediately have been trotted out if Harper was in power... leftists are now employing that phony meme in the US, against Trump, in order to deflect from Turdo in Canada - that's just how the propaganda is carried out)

But, now that Turdo, Canada's Shiny Pony, is in power, who is suppressing who?!

- Was Cote told by his CBC bosses NOT to ask Phillips or Black any inconvenient questions about climate change?

- Was the CBC suppressing, censoring, and shaping/editorializing climate science?

- Was CBC reporter Cote told by Phillips or by Black not to ask them about climate change??

- Or, did CBC reporter Cote just decide all on his own (...and his CBC editor just said nothing..!) to not ask such questions, because he figured it just wouldn't look good for Phillips or Black to be put on the spot and be badgered to provide actual evidence for what 'everybody knows' is "settled" climate change?!

The above questions point to what a piece of CBC fake news this story really is.

What's a cozy nudge-nudge-wink-wink between two 'don't-ask-don't-tell' dance partners... we're all friends here, playin' for the same team, you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours...

Cote didn't tell us whether he did or didn't actuallyask Phillips or Black about climate change; we don't know if they answered... all we know is that another great smelly piece of GreenFear propaganda was shat out by the CBC, where the inherent impression is left that this is all due to 'climate change', yet where, at the same time, no evidence to make such a link is actually presented.

That's some fine propaganda!! We are all just supposed to "know" nudge-nudge-wink-wink, that everything in the article IS about climate change!! Through osmosis, innuendo, and conflation, we are supposed to "know", we are supposed to take for granted, that AGW is a given, infallible premise here - naturally, "all-settled" - which cannot be questioned.So, why belabour the point by asking pesky questions, when we 'know' that it's 'all settled'??!?

It's apparently just not polite to ask!

WTF - really?? What a farce.

Cote once again demonstrates the Cagey Tango - it's f*cking ridiculous how hundreds of reporters do the exact same thing with Dave Phillips; they follow the same template, the same dance steps, to put on the same propaganda show.

CHAPTER 18

We saw the Cagey Tango in action again, when good old Cagey Dave Phillips was trotted out for an appearance in one heck of a CTV News climate-fear story on CTV's 11 pm national news broadcast in Canada, Sept.1, 2017. (http://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1200532)

It was sad to watch Sandie Rinaldo having to host a pathetic story by John Vennavally-Rao; she starts her introduction by stating "it seems {...note: she said "seems"...} that there are more storms pounding the planet these days" and goes on to conflate monsoons in "India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan" and "intense flooding" in Nigeria to the storm Harvey in Texas.

This wham-bam set-up between Rinaldo and Rao is textbook propaganda: the entire segment was set up as being a 'question' by Rinaldo {..."Is climate change the culprit?" Rinaldo plaintively asks before passing the GreenFear torch to Rao} but really, it was NOT an examination - it was a presentation of climate fear-mongering in the best GreenFear tradition: all bluster but no evidence of man made climate change.

After all, isn't that really what CTV wanted Phillips to publicly say: that humans are to blame? So why not actually ask Canada's senior climatologist the question?

Who stopped Sandie Rinaldo or John Vennavally-Rao from asking David Phillips for proof of AGW?Who 'suppressed' David Phillips this time?! It wasn't Harper, or Trump: it was CTV.

In reality, journalism wasn't on the agenda in this CTV Fake News effort: this was a pretense of journalism, a screed with its own agenda: purporting to be news, presented as news, shown on CTV's national nightly news broadcast. But it wasn't news: it was calculated propaganda at the highest level.

This CTV media fakery used Cagey as an image, as a prop, as filler, as a 'wink-wink' gesture to virtue-signal that - despite the segment's supposed 'questioning' of climate change - the default position of this Rinaldo-Rao segment is that the story is NOT questioning climate change!!! Masterful deception.

The impression meant to be conveyed was that 'climate change' WAS the cause of hurricane Harvey - and that there was no question about this!!!

That is the typical GreenFear playbook: the default premise right off the bat is that "it's all settled" {...meaning there cannot be any questions...!} - so, we can see that Rinaldo's portrayal of this segment as being a 'question', was a false, deceptive introduction - since there was NO actual examination of the underlying "it's all settled' premise!
{How could there be questions, when "it's all settled"?!?}

This CTV 'story' was fixed and slanted from the get-go, the aim being to propagate the "it's all settled" GreenFear narrative, not question it.

This is the same old GreenFear-pushing tactic used at the Toronto Star and CBC.

The aim was to create an impression that 'climate change' (specifically AGW, specifically, humans) caused Harvey.

These same kind of stories always pop up with the same scary false causations, allusions, and conflations, just as it was with Katrina. (...French Prime Minister Macron did exactly that- six just 6 days after this story - see Chapter 19!!)

Cagey was used as a background for Rao's GreenFear-mongering - - no specifics from Phillips were actually required (...nor asked!!!); the point was to build a scary story with scary statements and scary video clips.

While Rao reports that "experts are reluctant to blame global warming for causing any single storm"...

(...which experts??? None were named! Was one of them David Phillips??? But, Rao just had Phillips on his segment, and Phillips didn't actually say on Rao's segment that he's "reluctant to blame global warming" ...!)

...Rao then goes on to try to show the exact opposite, conflating a link where there was none - it was all speculation and politicizing: the CTV corporate conglomerate even had Rao sliming President Donald Trump about climate-change - - this right after neither Rao himself, nor Al Gore, nor David Phillips, could actually provide evidence of AGW!

So "it's all settled" you see: we just can't provide the evidence.

This is the kind of fake news story that CTV pushes out these days - - and sadly Cagey David Phillips seems more than happy to oblige these kind of convoluted GreenFear propaganda efforts.
*

Note to CTV programmers and news directors: CTV should utilize this Rinaldo-Rao classic piece of GreenFear propaganda as an off-the shelf, ready-to-go-at-a-moment's-notice kind of instant GreenFear fake news video story, whenever any storm hits: all CTV has to do, is bleep out any reference to Harvey, and just insert the name of the new storm.
It's that easy!
This story is a classic boilerplate generic propaganda template, it is a goldmine which could save CTV a lot of money in the future by not having to write the same propaganda over and over for every storm: just recycle THIS classic - it's that good!
CTV could replay this same Rinaldo-Rao segment a week later - when Irma hits - and all they'd have to do, is insert the name 'Irma' - no-one would know or care that this originally appeared as 'Harvey'!
This Rinaldo-Rao segment has great GreenFear-mongering value!!
CTV could replay this same versatile, all-purpose GreenFear segment for years, for every storm that will ever occur in the future!!

"French President Emmanuel Macron says France is "grief-stricken" by the devastation caused by Hurricane Irma, and he's calling for concerted efforts to tackle global warming and climate change to prevent similar future natural disasters.

Speaking Thursday during a visit to Greece, Macron said the planet's situation must be stabilized and that leaders must make take steps to combat global warming "so we can avoid such natural disasters in the future."

French Interior Minister Gerard Collomb told Franc Info that at least eight people died and another 23 were injured when the monstrous Category 5 storm walloped the French Caribbean island territories of St. Martin and St. Barthelemy. That number is expected to rise."

Yes, Macron is spouting the same GreenFear mantra that Canada's Liberal climate-change-pusher pusher Justin Turdo spouts.Looks like Macron is channeling Al Gore and David Suzuki - - and politicizing a natural disaster to push some more GreenFear bolshevism. Macron - like Canadian PM Justin Turdo - believes that the "planet's situation must be stabilized"!Not only is Macron calling to 'combat' global warming - he's ALSO going to 'tackle' climate-change'.Apparently, y'see, 'global warming' and 'climate change' are now NOT the same thing anymore, in the GreenFearFascist playbook.So Macron is now de-conflating 'climate-change', to make it appear that it is separate from 'global-warming! Such dichotomy, such inconsistency - coming from someone who demands stability and consistency from 'the Planet'....! Maybe Macron needs to be 'stabilized'...? Is this the new revised Agenda 21 narrative, which will be coming soon to Canada, in order to muddle the GreenFear alarmists' own lexicon?In Canada, will any reporter ask Justin Turdo about Macron's comments, and ask Turdo to specifically endorse Macron's comments that hurricanes can be prevented, and to publicly link Hurricanes Irma and Harvey to man-made climate change, which can be reversed??! Will anyone ask Canada's Cagey Climatologist David Phillips to publicly confirm that Hurricanes Irma and Harvey were not natural, but were 'man-made' - - and whether they could have been 'prevented'???But, we know such questions will never be asked - it is just enough that the Agenda 21 puppet Macron obediently mouth the obligatory GreenFear memes, and that his GreenFear-infected colleagues around the world knowingly and approvingly nod in agreement - - yet, no specifics will be offered, because 'it's all settled'.No one it seems will ask the GreenFear-infected Macron how he will "prevent" disasters that are {as he himself just said...!} inherently "natural"? Macron is saying here that he will prevent what is natural - and the gravity of this statement doesn't raise any eye-brows?What Macron is saying here is in itself UNNATURAL, and inconsistent with reality.And yet: this state of cognitive dissonance is considered quite normal to the GreenFear-infected masses.Is Macron acknowledging that hurricanes are "natural disasters", or does he not understand the meaning of 'natural disaster'? How will Macron "prevent natural disasters"?! This GreenFearmonger is spouting nonsense.Is he saying hurricanes are 'preventable' because they are caused by man (ie hurricanes are not natural!) and therefore, they can also be prevented by man?! oops: there's that cagey inconsistency again!! Conflate this, deconflate that, mix this term here with that term there, claim one thing here causes another thing over there... In Macron's mind, is all of nature man-made, and therefore 'preventable', as well?!?

CHAPTER 20
GreenFear pushing climatalarmists keep pushing their unsubstantiated delusions, which conveniently conflate events such as Hurricane Sandy {...or Katrina, or Irma, or fill-in-the-blank...} with man-made climate change.
We saw this again at Rex Tillerson's Jan. 10, 2017 confirmation hearing, where some protester began shouting that her home was destroyed by Hurricane Sandy - the intended (though in reality unfounded) implication being that man (...personified in this protester's mind into being Tillerson himself..!) caused the climate to change, thereby causing Hurricane Sandy, thereby destroying her house. It's that simple, y'see.
This is the kind of delusional link, the kind of tenuous, conflated innuendo, that green bolsheviks - such as Jim Bradley's and Justin Trudeau's Liberals - love to encourage, love to see, love to foment.
They revel in seeing their pathetic work unfold in this kind of spectacle - this is is their kind of GreenFear at work. This green cancer is in Canada, and in the States.

We see it again, regarding Hurricane Irma.

Back on Jan 10 2017, Canada had to endure another visit from another deluded global-warming-infected stooge, this time, from the limousine lefty Hanoi Jane Fonda, the Viet-Cong-Commie-hugger who happily posed with the VC's on an anti-aircraft gun, the same guns which the NVA used to kill Americans. Jane Fonda made a fortune proudly peddling her anti-American "Fuck The Army" mantra. She went to North Vietnam to support the Communist enemy, to show the dumb folks back home her creds as a commie supporter.

Fonda flew (yes, flew - on a green helicopter powered by unicorn-farts --- no hypocrisy here, ever...) over Fort McMurray in Alberta, then immediately made a baseless link by announcing matter-of-factly (as a psychopath might) that the fire was "part of global warming"!!

So, there ya go, folks:y'see? It's "all settled"! More Fake News fodder for the Disciples of Al Gore and David Suzuki: climate-change caused the Fort McMurray fire, according to the GreenFear Gospel delusions of Jane Fonda!

Despite what Hanoi Jane spouts, Environment Canada's Senior Climatologist, David Phillips, has never stated that the Fort McMurray fire was caused by 'climate change'. (Maybe Jane Fonda can get Canada's Cagey Climatologist to once and for all 'prove that climate change is man- made'!!! That'd be funny.) Where-oh-where does Hanoi Jane get her scripted 'facts'?!! You might wonder how some people become so deluded, so detached from reality.

What can you expect from pathetic multi-millionaires who dish out their scornful doses of leftism to the dumb proles?! Hanoi Jane brushed past a female protester (a protester, by the way, who was not ahappy Fonda fan) patronizingly telling the protester that "I am not against you" - while in fact, Hanoi Jane WAS against her, and against the people of Fort McMurray. Fonda was there on a 'higher' mission, as a GreenFear-spouting stooge.
Fonda should be nominated for a GreenFear Oscar for her amazing Fort McMurray performance, for her phony act, as she patronized the local yokels with her phony 'care' - all the while, her agenda was to shill for the Greenpeace/Agenda 21 globalists who despise the mere existence of Fort McMurray.
If Fonda can act as a willing propagandist for the Black Panthers, she can act as a useful idiot shilling for the 'Club of Rome' too.
It was amazing to see Fonda performing her Fort McMurray 'compassion' act - phony compassion from a person who had proudly named her own child with father Tom Hayden,'after a Viet Cong martyr who attempted to assassinate US defense secretary Robert McNamara, before wisely changing it to Troy".

That's the kind of deplorable mentality which touched down in Fort McMurray.

(Isn't it hilarious, by the way, how Wikipedia's lengthy page about Jane Fonda DOESN'T MENTION that Fonda's infatuation with Viet Cong Communists led to her naming a child after an assassin? Wikipedia just says this:

"Their son, Troy O'Donovan Garity, was born on July 7, 1973 in Los Angeles, and was given his paternal grandmother's maiden name, as the names "Fonda and Hayden carried too much baggage". Fonda and Hayden wanted to give their son a name that "was both American and Vietnamese" and chose "Troy", an Anglicization of the Vietnamese "Troi", as the only name they could think of meeting that requirement. Hayden chose O'Donovan as the middle name after Irish revolutionary Jeremiah O'Donovan Rossa."

Amazing how Wikipedia's Jane Fonda page simply avoids (covers up) any further details explaining Fonda's 'Anglicization of Troi" - such as that name was chosen to lionize and honour an enemy of the US who tried to kill an American defense secretary!

But, Wikipedia's page on Nguyen Van Troi DOES state that:

"Anti-war activists Jane Fonda and Tom Hayden named their son, an actor now known as Troy Garity, in honor of Trỗi."

Then we look at Troy Garity's Wikipedia page, which states:

"Troy Garity was born Troi O’Donovan Garity Hayden... ... His parents named him for the Vietnamese resistance leader Nguyen Van Troi"

Funny at how the information is skewed here - reading this deceptive spin, we are led to believe that Jane Fonda lovingly named her son after a simple, benign, well-meaning friendly ole "resistance leader" y'see - not after an assassin who attempted to kill Americans Robert McNamara and Henry Cabot Lodge Jr.

CHAPTER 21

It didn't take long for some deluded celebrity to conflate Hurricane Irma with - - wait for it... Donald Trump!This time, it's Jennifer Lawrence spouting nonsense in the Sept. 9, 2017 Independent, sounding as if she is mentally ill:

"Jennifer Lawrencehas suggested that it is difficult not to feel as though the devastating hurricanes in Texas and approaching Florida are signs of “Mother Nature’s rage and wrath” at America for electing Donald Trump....... "It's scary," she said in response to the interviewer’s statement that there was "an end-of-days feeling" across the world.“You know, it’s this new language that’s forming. I don’t even recognise it. It’s also scary to know that climate change is due to human activity, and we continue to ignore it, and the only voice that we really have is through voting.”She then suggested the recent hurricanes devastating Texas and nearing Florida may have been prompted by Trump winning the presidency. "I’ve heard things and seen things on TV in my own country that devastate me and make me sick, and it’s just really confusing."Lawrence has been a vocal critic of Trump since he launched his presidential campaign in 2015, when she said a victory by him would "be the end of the world" during an Entertainment Weekly interview.

She also spoke about him on the Graham Norton show in 2016 where she said she wanted an opportunity to see him and say: "Hey Trump - f*** you.""

Lawrence's "language" is easy to recognize, it's symptomatic of GreenFear-infection, a deluded mixture of confusion, fear, hate, and ignorance, all summed up in one pathetic politicized propagandized package.

Who in Canada will ask Canada's Cagey Climatologist David Phillips to confirm that "climate change is due to human activity" - as Lawrence AND as Canadian PM Justin Turdo both claim?Can David Phillips confirm that the weather and the climate will stop changing - and go into stasis - if Jennifer Lawrence's favourite politicians get elected??!

Lawrence isn't the only one spouting these profoundly ignorant GreenFear delusions: in Canada, climate alarmists such as J-Turd's federal Liberals and Kathleen Wynne's Ontario Liberals all spout the same propagandized Agenda-21 GreenFear. (The fear-mongers of the IPCC are meeting in Montreal this week with J-Turd's Environment Canadato cook up some more GreenFear for Lawrence's future consumption..!)

You can bet that pretty much all Canadian federal Liberal MP's and MPP's are cheering Lawrence on, as they believe and agree exactly with what she is saying: she is echoing their own delusions.

And yet: Canada's Cagey Climatologist sits on the sidelines, and cannot or will not discuss the GreenFear-mongering which his own federal agency is carrying on with the IPCC!!!

There have been countless comments made, similar to the idiocy spouted by Jennifer Lawrence, which bizarrely conflate Trump to 'climate change'. Typical would be something such as was posted by commenter David Grant, in a Dec.31, 2017 Newsweek artcle written by Grace Guarnieri headlined: "NIAGARA FALLS SNOW PHOTOS: THE WATERFALLS HAVE FROZEN OVER DURING NORTH AMERICAN COLD SNAP" . Grant vomited out: "This is what you get for voting for Trump!"Wow: how utterly moronic - and you can bet that Jennifer Lawrence would entirely agree with this clown.Obviously, it doesn't matter to Grant that the same cold had occurred in Niagara during Obama's term - - - and for thousands of years previously!!The mental illness displayed by these GreenFear-infected people is astounding.The deceptive, click-bait part of the Newsweek article was that - contrary to Newsweek's fake news claim - the waterfalls at Niagara were NOT "frozen over" at all; the water was flowing as it usually does. Water freezes in these parts in the winter - it is commonplace for the mist from the falls to cover the surrounding area with a buildup of ice!!But the intent of articles such as these (and there were literally thousands of these articles between Christmas and New Year of 2017) are trying to make it look as if there is something out of the ordinary happening here, hinting at "climate change", as if Niagara Falls had never encountered freezing cold before! These sensationalized, spiked, fake reports roll out like clockwork every winter, as the WORLD-WIDE media gets involved, amplifying a lie that 'Niagara Falls has frozen', and, that this is somehow a never-seen-before phenomenon associated with 'climate change'. These local readers in far off places have no effing clue about it, yet chime in with their bizarre "knowledge" that somehow it has all to do with "climate change" or Trump.What reporter Guarnieri should do, is follow up her Newseek non-story with a REAL examination of Niagara Falls' mayor Jim Diodati's destructive record of Liberal GreenFear beliefs. Please ask the GreenFear-pusher Dionutty to prove that the winter in Niagara Falls was caused by 'climate change'!!! It would be instructive to watch the lies pour out of Diodati's mouth as he scrambles to assemble rationalizations based on fictitious climate fairy tales he learned from Jim Bradley and Al Gore. Make no mistake: Liberal hack Jim Diodati himself DOES think that climate change causes winter in Niagara and causes the falls to... uh... 'freeze'! Diodati in his rapture with Green Bolshevism would also most likely agree that Trump caused the falls to freeze!! That's just the way these deluded Liberals are.It was sickening to see this clown Diodumbo, with the other clown Mercer, going on about the cold on the CBC's New Years telecast from Niagara Falls on Dec. 31, 2017.. {...as if it being cold was something unusual; as if , as the deluded left like to now stereotype, as if it was extreme weather, which had never happened before!}How is it that deluded morons who believe that hurricanes were caused by Trump, or that 'the falls froze because of Trump', have no explanation why hurricanes existed under Obama; or why Niagara Falls is 'frozen' on the Canadian side, where Liberals Diodati, Kathleen Wynne, and Justin Trudeau have jurisdiction?!! Didn't the falls on the Canadian side also freeze due to Turdo and Diodopey and Krooked Kathleen being elected, as well?!?Oh... wait... it doesn't work that way... ... ah... I see... !!

CHAPTER 22

Further to the issues raised in Chapter 13 (...where Canada's Cagey Climatologist refused 'to go there' when asked about climate change!) we now see this sanctimonious claptrap from Akshat Rathi at Quartz (Sept. 2, 2017) propagandizing that "Nobody would claim global warming created Harvey" - is this writer for real?!Nobody?Jennifer Lawrence spouted that same superstition just a week after this article! Untold tens of thousands believe the GreenFear-mongering propagated by Obama and Crooked Hillary and Justin Trudeau and Stephane Dion and Jim Bradley and Al Gore and David Suzuki and the IPCC!! The Toronto Star and CTV and CBC and TVO and Huffington Post and countless other GreenFear-infected media sites - with 'moral license'! - constantly blare their GreenFear climatalarmism.

Rathi is in fact pushing GreenFear with this ridiculous article. He has the obligatory slime against Trump, then goes on to fear-monger that "The more Americans see global warming as a direct threat, the better the chances for the whole world of doing something about it."

So Rathi does us a favour here, and reveals the phony underpinnings of the GreenFear hoax: that it is a matter of deception and of perception -not a matter of reality. It's a matter of appearance over substance. It's a matter of tone, of politicization, of power-grabbing, of exploiting natural disasters to fear-monger for political power.

This is GreenFear exposed.

Note how Rathi disgustingly couches his GreenFear propaganda in moral, not scientific tones - after all, his crap is headed "A "QUESTION OF TONE: It’s morally right to bring up climate change even as the tragedy of Hurricane Harvey unfolds."Again, it's important to notice what the default position here is: it is the phony GreenFear premise that "it's all settled", so there cannot be a question of AGW. Therefore, in this perverted, gamed construct, the 'moral high-ground' also defaults to the GreenFear-pushers.

It's funny, how Rathi and his GreenFear-pushing colleagues never criticize the 'tone' of Canada's Cagey Climatologist David Phillips, about the "morality" of Cagey refusing to acknowledge what Rathi would like Cagey to acknowledge: that humans cause hurricanes.

Isn't Cagey's refusal 'to go there' immoral, in Rathi's perverted opinion? (ahem... who muzzled Rathi not to ask David Phillips about these issues?!?)

It seems that most Canadian media outlets actually believe (through secret codes being telegraphed by Cagey and his interviewers..!!!!!!!!!!!) that Cagey IS covertly admitting that humans cause hurricanes - - isn't that the unspoken undercurrent, the intended subliminal take-away, of every David Phillips 'Cagey Tango interview' since time immemorial !?!

Yet, GreenFear-mongering propagandists such as Rathi, paint Trump with climate-immorality - while Cagey remains morally unscathed, as pure and morally innocent as the man-made snow!!

CHAPTER 23

On Sept..11, 2017, David Horsey, a science-fiction-peddling entertainer in the Los Angeles Times, spouted off more GreenFear horsesh!t, peddling the GreenFear climate change lie while saying that climate change doesn't cause hurricanes wildfires, or tornadoes!! Yep: figure that one out!! Marvel at the disconnect, the deflection and the deception!

Canada's Cagey Climatologist would be impressed by the sheer deception, deflection, and perversion penned here by Horsey - this is Toronto-Star-quality, Green Bolshevik-level, propaganda!

Here's a classic climate-change-propaganda piece, deceptively crafted and presented as NOT being a climate-change-propaganda piece! (...like that CTV Rinaldo-Rao phony report in Chapter 18... or like most CBC reports..!)

David Horsesh!t includes an obligatory slime against Trump AND Rush Limbaugh - yet, strangely, the seemingly-cognitively-impaired Horsey doesn't comprehend the conflicting 'logic' in his climate tale: Limbaugh has never claimed that hurricanes are caused by 'climate change'; so in fact, Horsey AGREES with Limbaugh, yet still finds it necessary to attack him!

Horsey deftly, purposefully, ignores - he denies! - mentioning all the other climate change hoaxters who DO claim that climate change (...including hurricanes) is caused by man!

That is exactly the perception that they do want to convey - - it's not the opposite, as this LA Times science-fiction entertainer purports!

-

CHAPTER 24

Following up on CTV's previous climate-propaganda-peddling efforts (as seen previously in Chapter 18), we see CTV and David Phillips again spreading climate-change propaganda in Josh K. Elliott's June 1, 2017 CTV News story.

Do you see the purposeful deception; the double-speak, the planned innuendo and Green-Fear-mongering inherent in this piece of typical green-garbage 'reporting'?

Josh - like hundreds of Green-fear-spreading lemming 'reporters' before him - DID NOT bother to ask Cagey for Cagey's specific evidence of man-made climate change: why did this CTV reporter fail to be accurate; why did his editors allow this shoddy type of pseudo-journalism to continue?

This "story" is just like hundreds - if not thousands - of other similar half-baked, innuendo-laden stories in which Cagey was prominently featured over the years, spouting the same GreenFear mongering crap, dancing the exact same Cagey Tango with some compliant reporter.

It is important to note that in his last paragraph, Josh wrote that David Phillips 'added that summers have been gradually warming up over the last 70 years due to climate change' - yet, look closely: Josh DID NOT actually provide the specific quote anywhere in his article of EXACTLY what Cagey said on this point - - there was no direct quote by David Phillips; it was Josh K. Elliott's interpretation of whatever Cagey said.

Take a look: the only mention of climate change was made in the story's last paragraph by CTV reporter Josh, who then attributed it to David Phillips. If Phillips said this, why not then actually provide the actual quote in its entirety???

Why does CTV publish an entire article creating ominous fear about weather (with no mention of climate-change), until the very last paragraph, where climate-change is finally introduced as the 'cause' of all this previously-mentioned weather? Furthermore, as pointed out, the climate change phrase is not given to us as a direct quote, but as an attribution made by the reporter.

Why all this two-faced, side-stepping double-speak???

Did David Phillips actually directly claim - with no scientific evidence asked for, nor any provided...! - that the summers are warmer everywhere on the planet since 1947??!

- And, on the other hand, why wouldn't David Phillips correct the reporter, if the report overstated or misinterpreted what was said?!? For Gaia's sake: Cagey Dave had "refused to go there" about climate-change with the CBC (...see Chapter 13 above!) back in March 2017; so why would Cagey Dave decide to (supposedly) mention climate change to this CTV reporter, in this story, 3 months later??!

- And why didn't CTV reporter Josh K. Elliott challenge David Phillips to specify what "climate-change" David Phillips was referring to? Was Cagey cagily and obliquely referring to man-made climate change? Or, was that cleverly left for reporter Josh to assume on his own; to use his own biases to interpret Cagey's vague decantings, maybe taking personal guidance from climate luminaries such as, oh, Leonardo Dicaprio or Jane Fonda or Jennifer Lawrence, known for their knowledgeable perspectives?!?

- Why didn't CTV's stenographer Josh ask David Phillips to provide the evidence that it was man-made climate change (AGW) which according to Canada's Senior Cliamatalarmist, has caused 'summers to be warmer for 70 years' ?????

- And why didn't this CTV stenographer ask David Phillips to scientifically back up his supposed 'last 70 years' claim? The summer warming started '70 years' ago eh? - - but exactly where?? Was it everywhere - equally, without exception, across the entire planet - exactly 70 years ago, that summers started getting warmer??! That's what Josh reported that Cagey told him!!!

We've seen this exact same Cagey Tango, where the media and David Phillips perform their award-winning Cagey Side-Step routine, where some reporter and Cagey cozily dance their choreographed 'don't-ask-don't-tell / you-know-what-I-want' moves; the reporter willingly side-steps asking hard questions, as Cagey coyly side-steps giving soft answers, both moving in unison to carefully make sure - nudge-nudge-wink-wink - that they don't step onto each other's toes for their own mutual benefit, to further their own agendas - - it's the exact same GreenFear-mongering template, the same song-and-dance, time after nauseating time.

What was different 71 years ago, then?? Can David Phillips provide evidence that AGW suddenly started on Jan.1, 1947 {...but only, apparently, during the summers!!} and that there was NO climate change prior to 1947????! Were summers all colder, everywhere on the planet, up to the end of 1946??!

C'mon Dave: WTF are ya doin' here?!?

Did it not occur to CTV reporter Josh K. Elliott to ask??

Or was it Josh's job here, in collecting his CTV pay cheque, to not ask any questions, to not rock the 'it's all settled' boat, but to just dance the Cagey Tango with David Phillips, obediently spreading climate change propaganda??

CHAPTER 26

Let's remember how Canadian Liberal Prime Minister, the global GreenFear-pushing Justin Trudeau, moaned about the death of socialist scumbag Maurice Strong, who was an inspiration to many of Canada's sick Liberals and socialists. (...Turdo also is fond of dictatorships, because they can get things - like climate change legislation - done quickly, without opposition...)

Back in 2007... (back when Ontario's own Godfather of GreenFear, Liberal MPPJim Bradley, was agitating for climate fascism) ... a detailed article about Strong was written by Claudia Rosett, on Feb. 8, 2007, headlined "The Curious Career of Maurice Strong", in which Rosett named Strong as the "Godfather of the environmental movement" (..which is exactly what Liberal GreenFearmonger Jim Bradley made himself out to be in Ontario, by the way). The article gave an eyeopening summary into the green fascist movement as it was at the time, ten years ago - but - it is still quite relevant, interesting and informative to re-read this same article, ten years later, in 2017, to see how prescient the analysis and warnings were.

"...This is a speech I first gave to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in 1996, just four years after the UN’s Earth Summit in Rio. At the time I gave this address there were strong indications that Maurice Strong could be chosen as the next UN Secretary General. It didn’t happen, but that didn’t diminish his influence over the body. In fact, In 1996 all roads in the UN led to Maurice Strong. This speech represented the first time that the CPAC audience and most conservatives had ever heard of the radical agenda of the environmental movement. It was probably the first time the term Sustainable Development was ever heard by a conservative audience. In fact, at the time I gave this speech, environmentalism was the most popular and most powerful movement in the world. Yet, here, 15 years before “Climategate” I was revealing the very root of what was to become the “Climate Change” movement and its drive to destroy the industrial West. By the way, tapes of this speech became the most popular of any ever produced by the American Policy Center and continues to be one of our best sellers. TD

Let me begin by asking you a few questions. They may seem rather silly – but I have a point. So, please, just indulge me for a moment – just answer with a show of hands:

How many of you know of Adolf Hilter – and that he was evil? How many of you know Mao Tse Tung – and that he was evil? How many of you know of Lenin and Stalin – and that they were evil?

How many of you know of Maurice Strong – and that he is evil?

There is the point of my questions. Maurice Strong has the potential to be the most powerful and most evil dictator the world has ever known – right now – today – in our day and age – and yet, most of you have never heard of him."...

The CBC reports Justin Turdeau spewing the leftist meme about Strong being a pioneer in "sustainable development"- but what does that crap mean?

Does Turdo himself understand what his Agenda 21 handlers are telling him to say?!

Well, as it happens, DeWeese had already pre-explained for us, back in 2012, what Trudeau (and all his Turdobot Agenda 21 clones along with him) mean, when they speak of "sustainability":

"The assault on property rights – in fact the entire radical environmental agenda – is being driven by the United Nations. And Maurice Strong is the number one force behind UN environmental policy. Maurice Strong is the leader of a radical contingent of Environmentalists that believe technology and modern industrialization must be stopped.

Does that sound overstated or too extreme? Well, let me read you a much more radical statement and these are not my words – they’re Maurice Strong’s:

In 1992, Strong told a UN conference…: “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class, involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.”

Now, let me explain this new term “Sustainable” that you will see popping up in environmental policy more and more. Radical greens believe that all of man’s activities on Earth are harmful (and therefore not sustainable). They believe that man is a cancer on the Earth. Their goal is to slowly cut back and finally end all development and reduce human habitat to specific areas while the rest of the world is turned into wilderness."

This is the belief of GreenFear-pushers, such as Niagara's Liberal MPP Jim Bradley. This is what the Green-Shifter Stephane "Bumbledore" Dion believed. This is what St. Catharines MP Chris Bittle's federal Liberals believe. This is what Jim Bradley's Ontario Liberals believe. Just because Strong is dead doesn't mean that his fellow-travelers have stopped kissing his ideological ass: they relentlessly continue push their GreenFear agenda, on a daily basis. (TVO airs climate propaganda every day!)

And climatalarmist David Phillips? It looks like he's just one of the soldier-enablers on that gangrene-infected GreenFear Road.

-

Nicolle Mortillaro (CBC Nov.13, 2017) spouted more GreenFear, and the same day, on the CBC's disgusting nightly "National News" television broadcast, the pathetic Rosemary Barton kept up the GreenFear shill, peddling the climate change '15,000 scientists' garbage over and over, unquestioningly regurgitating what they were told to spout.

CHAPTER 27

Now that there was another cold snap across Canada and the States in Dec. 2017, starting before Christmas, it's funny how the global warming and climate rhetoric becomes more subdued. (it doesn't stop TVO from peddling its climate change propaganda, though: they still shill their green garbage EVERY DAY, almost hourly!) The GreenFear is still being peddled, but using unsubstantiated phrases such as 'it feels like' and 'extreme'. When Canada got a white Christmas, the Green Fear peddlers cringed, because they would have preferred writing more of their 'Green Christmas' narrative stories, to peddle their spin.
Cagey Dave was peddling the idea that there would be a warmer winter, as Alexandra Jones wrote in the Toronto Star Nov.21, 2017, in an article comparing Dave Phillps' projections with Chris Scott's forecasts. But make no mistake about it, Alexandra Jones' Star article was nothing but typical GreenFear propaganda - there was no semblance of journalism here: the elephant in the room - AGW - was purposefully and carefully avoided by Jones AND by her two subjects.

A real interview with Cagey and Scott by a non GreenFear-infected journalist would be quite interesting - yet, this was NOT it, and it appears there never will be such a thing on Canadian media.

You will note that the underlying lie (that AGW is man -made) is, as expected, as usual the unquestioned starting point - therfore rendering the entire discussion here as a charade.
Who censored Alexandra Jones, preventing her from directly asking Cagey Dave and Scott for answers regarding the evidence of man -made climate change?! Listening to these participants, no-one broaches the question if the El Nina or El Nino they refer to, are also 'man-made'!! Did anyone muzzle Jones, or David Phillips, or Chris Scott?! This phony Toronto Star 'reporter' had a direct chance to engage BOTH high-profile weather forecasters to confront the issue as to whether the weather they are commenting upon, is DIRECTLY LINKED to man made climate change.

But instead, Alexandra Jones doubled-down and just performed a slimy Cagey menage-a-trois three-step tango.

Her CBC snow-job was not to investigate climate-change, but to propagate climate change.

Get ready for the Toronto Red Star to publish some slime about Trump AND deflect from the NON-global warming we're having - oh, wait: as expected. they've already done it, reprinting a sack of Greenfear Garbage headlined "It’s cold outside. Get ready for the Trump global warming tweet"

Finally, Canada's cagiest Climatologist comes out and claims that all weather is due to man made climate change - or is it really what he said - who knows?! Thankfully, a sports videographer (not a science-fiction critic...) was on hand to help peddle Cagey's climatic- wet-dream, writing:

"Canadians love to talk about the weather. And there’s been plenty to talk about this winter with lots of snow, deep freezes and quick thaws.According to experts, it all falls into the category of “climate change,” the focus of a Kingston Symposium on Friday. Environment Canada senior climatologist David Phillips helped to kick off the daylong event."Everybody recognizes now that it is a major threat, probably one of the most important environmental issues that humankind has ever faced.”Raising awareness and pushing for action — that’s what Phillips and others are trying to do...."

You read it: snow, freezing and thawing are somehow all conflated by David Phillips into being un-natural, caused by man! (Therefore, unexplained "action" is needed... !)

David Phillips - on the federal government's payroll as Canada's Chief Climate Green-Fear propagandist - peddled horseshit that "Everybody recognizes now that it is a major threat, probably one of the most important environmental issues that humankind has ever faced.” without any scrutiny from anyone in Kingston!! Why doesn't David Phillips make these bloated claims under his official capacity as an Environment Canada employee? Is he expressing his personal or his official federal government department's official views?? Why isn't anyone asking?

This Climate Clown was preaching his addictive GreenFear-mongering to his own echo chamber.

Apparently, Canada has never had snow, never seen thaws, never experienced floods, never has droughts, never had severe storms...... it's the same deceptive, Cagey Crap, shat out of Cagey's deceptive mouth into the receptive ears of his GreenFear-infected acolytes.
Cagey was there to peddle his seductive climate-change bullshit - that's clearly his 'gig' - and his fans eagerly swallowed Cagey's GreenFear-infected deceptive diarrhea

The Kingston Whig Standard's Elliot Ferguson had a chance to act as a reporter, instead of a fan, by asking David Phillips for any evidence that anything Cagey was saying, was linked to man made AGW climate change. {...because that was the underlying pathological delusion underlying the raison d'etre of this 'sustainability' conclave, wasn't it - that AGW climate change is all settled / so don't ask any questions, move along now, g'wan outta here, ya denier...}

David Phillips fear mongers about extremes and about changes, yet, no one asks him to quantify anything, nor question his theories on his preferred alt-world-climate view - that of climate stasis - where apparently nothing anywhere, ever changes (...and if it does change, well, gulldarnit, it'll be controlled by da gubermint... ... ... it beggars the laws of thermodynamics.

But Ferguson - like the thousands of 'reporter lemmings' before him - DID NOT bother to question things: Ferguson re-peddled Cagey's conflated deceptions and happily sent Cagey's green fertilizer/propaganda back to his editor for spreading - wink, wink, wham, bam, thank-you, man: the sordid Cagey Tango was flawlessly and effortlessly performed once again, just as expected!

The dirty dance was done, and - hurrah! - no GreenFear was hurt or damaged during the production - the deceptions and conflations will live on to propagate another day! The dance partners had their brief moment, and the issue of their dance - a shiny new GreenFear report - will, Gaia-bless, grow with the years, joining the thousands of older bastard stories inseminated by Cagey and his dance partners, in their legendary Pantheon Of Propaganda.

CHAPTER 29

Then we had David Phillips' boss, the Liberal hack Catherine McKenna, spouting more of her GreenFear delusions, see:

This is the climate-change perversity under which David Phillips thrives!

Funny how Canada's GreenFear press carefully ensures that their 'reporters' never ask BOTH Cagey David Phillips and Climate Conjob Queen Catherine McKenna, in the same story, to each provide their corroborative scientific evidence of "man made global warming / climate change" !

{It's like Cagey is treated as Homey Dave The Entertaining Climatologist With All The Neato Weather Anecdotes, who says just enough to make ya think that he's got evidence of AGW; otherwise His Homeyness is PURPOSEFULLY kept compartmentalized from any substantive climate change issue!!}

We have seen that Cagey is blatantly left out of the loop, when McKenna opens her wide yap to spew climate fear and lie about solutions for a problem which she knows nothing about.

McKennadoesn'tuse David Phillips' climate spoutings as an evidence-source, because David Phillips is cagey enough to pin himself not with any actual evidence, but with the perception of evidence! Over the years, as we have well seen, David Phillips could have easily proven the "global warming / climate change is caused by man" thesis - - except for the fact that for all those years, he's never had any evidence to prove AGW; all David Phillips ever had was innuendo and conflation - just like any other Canadian Liberal has had: a lot of fear-mongering based on science-fiction.

(We well remember how the leftist press presented a phony narrative that somehow, 'science was being suppressed', prior to that piece of merde Turdo's election! Well - now that NO ONE is apparently still not suppressing Cagey - why can't Cagey come out of his comfortable climate closet and reveal publicly his support and devotion to Liberal McKenna's climate change delusions?!

Who's suppressing Cagey now?!

It's funny how the "suppression" meme was carried out to create an impression as if somehow David Phillips secretly knew 'all about the truth' that MAN 'caused the climate to change', and that only if bad ole Harper wasn't in power, well by golly, David Phillips would reveal everything!!

Well: that has not happened!

And there is no "suppression" now, any longer - - - is there?! heh!

It's been self suppression, self censorship by Cagey Dave and his co-opted legacy of reporter-co-conspirators for years; they happily hooked up with Cagey to perform their sordid Cagey Tangos - literally, with no questions asked!

THAT kind of suppression - collusion to peddle a lie - was never considered 'suppression' by those swingers who participated in hundreds of Cagey's past press orgies. They wrapped Cagey in a 'don't ask/ don't tell' sheath of devotion; they slipped on a mutually-beneficial condom of propaganda all these years; the media was Cagey's prophylactic, building up his profile; protecting him from criticism, protecting them from criticism; both coming out clean after each tryst with their craven GreenFear agendas satisfied.

We see that David Phillips' phony 'suppression under Harper' was just a decoy narrative, a deflection intended to politically smear Harper; yet, which in scientific terms, had nothing whatsoever to do with the actual science of climate change.

Cagey Dave HAD NOTHING then; and Cagey Dave still HAS NOTHING now.

David Phillips is SUPPRESSING HIMSELF:

- David Phillips suppressed HIMSELF by not revealing (during the time he was supposedly "suppressed" by others!) that he had NO evidence of AGW.

- David Phillips still suppresses himself (when he's supposedly NOT being "suppressed" by others!) by still not revealing that he has NO evidence of AGW.

This is a very concerning psychological state - publicly playing along with these narratives and themes, going with the flow, never questioning the false 'it's all settled' premise of AGW, all the while performing an act of pretense - peddling speculative, conflated propaganda - as if there was scientific evidence of AGW.

The phony 'science being suppressed' narrative was deflective AND projective: deflective in that it cast a smear (as was its political intent) against Harper; projective in that there was suppressionbeing carried out - but it was suppression by the GreenFear-pushers themselves, who attacked any political and scientific questioning of their climate change false construct.(...as the Liberal fascist McKenna is still doing in 2018!)

Cagey David Phillips (though purporting that he might have) never did have ANY shred of evidence of 'man made climate change' during his oh-so-phonily-difficult-years-of non-existent-suppression! - and he still doesn't.

Yet: it appears Cagey quite willingly allowed himself to be co-opted by the GreenFear-mongers as some kind of fellow-traveler mascot (a Stalinist 'useful idiot' comes to mind), and it is quite evident that David Phillips has become a Climate Change Quisling; a seeming stooge for the AGW-peddling liars who consider him their 'legitimizing' colleague.

When Liberal pieces of crap such as Climate-Con Queen McKenna make their climate claims, we do expect their lies: they are Liberals, after all; but it's sad to see what a climate charlatan David Phillips has become.

Truly pathetic.

When McKenna (instead of citing any actual scientific 'evidence' of AGW!) derisively mentions and dismisses "deniers", we AGAIN see the deceptive, deflective leftist bullying at work: Climate Barbarian McKenna peddles a fantasy, a delusion within which she cannot seem to find logical meaning: it's as if she is actually incapacitated and mentally unable to perform her role here. She is a disgrace, and a danger to Canada.

This is David Phillips' boss.

This is David Phillips' ideological colleague.

This is the kind of fascist climate-bully whose actions Climatologist David Phillips supports through his deafeningly studied silence.

You'd think that loquacious David Phillips would make some comment on McKenna's fascist climate related outburst - after all: David Phillips isn't... um... 'suppressed' any longer; he's free to speak out on climate change issues, as Canada's Chief Climatologist in Turdo's Canada, right!?

But look: Formerly-Loquacious-Dave cagily and conveniently experienced a sudden man-made drought of words; a man-made drought of opinion!

David Phillips aids and abets lying Liberal scumbags such as Catherine McKenna. Neither of these two have any shred of evidence to support the AGW man-made climate-change lie.

McKenna - like other 'climate-change' fascists - labels people who disagree with her authoritarian (...and, by the way, still unproven) views, as 'climate change deniers', a term intended by her to be an all encompassing smear.

Yet, it isnot a "denial of climate change" that is at issue here, is it??!!

Let's examine the bait-and-switch perversions being used here by the climate-change liar Catherine McKenna: what does this deluded Liberal hack even mean when she uses this phrase, which she believes to be an epithet describing some one else, yet, which is in fact a phrase she is projecting ABOUT HERSELF:

It's not about people 'denying climate change', as the Liberal liar McKenna claims; it's about people denying her lies about MAN-MADE climate change".

Propagandists such McKenna fraudulently misrepresent one as being the other: a massive bait and switch.

The climate DOES change: it ALWAYS haschanged; and it WILL continuetochange!!

It is deluded GreenFear-infected morons such as Crooked Catherine McKenna that are denying and purposefully deflecting from this elemental fact!

It's the fraudulent "man made" part that climate criminals such as McKenna fail to dis-associate from her deluded politics. Crooked Catherine is purposefully deceptive, muddling the distinctions to make an emotional, not a scientific case - she is peddling an alt-'reality', which isn't 'reality' at all, but fiction.

McKenna is peddling a man-made political lie, that in some bizarre fantasy, the "climate" had been in a fabled, wonderful, calm, peaceful, predictable stasis; that earth's climate had never changed, and that just by raising taxes and tinkering with human lives, she can CREATE CLIMATE STASIS again (...a fascist, scientifically-deluded wet dream - planned economies, planned weather, planned climate... everything planned and controlled by the Liberal gubmint...)

Do you see the vile perversion, the con-job, the bait-and-switch, the utter hypocrisy at play here?

It is Liberal Catherine McKenna who is the true "climate change denier".

It is Liberal GreenFear-mongering political criminals such as Justin Turdo and his Crooked Climate Barbie who are peddling denials of climate reality: 'climate stasis' was NEVER the norm.

McKenna and her GreenFear-infected fellow travelers obfuscate and conflate and build insane scientific narratives based on dangerous political lies and science-fiction.

we see that those pesky deniers are still badgering Canada's Crooked Climate Queen, Catherine McKenna with silly questions about McKenna's Liberal climate change lies!!

Too bad that Liberal liar McKenna can't rely on getting ANY help from her employee, Canada's Senior Climatologist David Phillips on the climate change issue!! After all, what's climate change got to do with climatology - right!!?

Helen Warn keeps asking McKenna for a response:

"Well Climate Barbie. You STILL haven't answered my basic question, although I have asked you many times, including e-mailing you at your official government e-mail address.And unlike you, Barbie, I have some qualifications, including a PhD in meteorology from McGill, and papers published in academic journals.So here it is, one again:What, exactly, is being *measured* to justify spending piles of money on this issue? And how accurate are those measurements, both now and over time? And how do you know what the contribution of human activity is to whatever you are measuring?Since AGW believers frequently bring up surface temperature, let's look at it as an example.So show me a map of the earth's surface temperature, and a companion map of the margin of error.Then do the same thing in (say) 1980.If you prefer another atmospheric parameter than surface temperature, suggest it and provide reasons for your choice, and then answer the same questions.Finally, tell me what part of the differences is due to human activity, how you know, and how accurately you know it.".

That piece of crap Liberal Catherine McKenna in Ottawa is doing exactly what that piece of Liberal crap Jim Bradley had done in Ontario: it's the same green fascist template: propagate the AGW lie; never provide any AGW evidence.

It's an old story, with criminal proportions.

CHAPTER 31

A reason explaining why the disgusting Liberal climate-change liar Crooked Catherine McKenna cannot expect to use ANYTHING that David Phillips says about climate change, can be found in this typical "Cagey Tango" report: look what passes as serious commentary from Canada's Senior Climatologist - it's pathetic.

Of course, the "climatologist" here is Canada's Cagiest Climatologist, David Phillips, offering another DOOZY of an "interview". It's amazing that this kind of climate garbage, this kind of sordid Cagey Tango, has been going on for essentially what - - some 30,000 interviews?! (see Chapter 32 if ya don't believe that!) - and yet the issue of man made climate change IS NEVER QUESTIONED!! These reporters file skewed stories (stories with an intentional built-in bias that "AGW is real") which are at their heart, fake news, false reports, puffball pieces with large amounts of relevant context simply - purposefully - ignored... it has to be seen this way by now; one cannot listen to the weather garbage being tossed around by Cagey, and keep what he says in a vacuum separated from the political realities and context surrounding what he says.

"David Phillips blames a polar vortex for the spring cold snap.

(No questions about this from the possibly-unconscious reporter - "But David: Turdo tells us MAN is to blame for climate change)"At this time of the year, it's often back and forth, up and coming, very yo-yoish kind of weather, where you're getting winter trying to hold on and summer wants to get a foothold," Phillips said Monday.

(No questions about this from the possibly-unconscious reporter, who could have called out and asked "Yo-yo-ish" eh? "Back and forth", huh? "Up and coming"? Is that official, scientific climatologist lingo? Care ta 'splain that?"
You know: the kind of questions a journalist would eagerly ask, if he was an interviewing a 'scientist suppressed by Harper'! )

"And yet the war is being won by winter. Old Man Winter is clearly the bully in this particular situation and has got a grip on the entire West and is not letting go."

(No questions about this from the possibly-unconscious reporter. "There's war on against the West? Whaaat - ya mean, like Liberals are attacking Canada's West?? Whaddaya mean, David, exactly? And who is "Old Man Winter" David?? We don't see this guy listed anywhere with Environment Canada, or in Catherine McKenna's Liberal climate change policies.

Is he a Liberal bag man?

A Liberal lobbyist?

What does Old Man Winter have to do with the science of climate change, David?

David, aren't YOU the climate-change-peddling bully?

David, why are you blaming some fictional character, when YOU spout GreenFear everyday? You sit mute when Liberals BULLY Canadians with unsubstantiated climate-change fear; you yourself say the same things! Canadians are being bullied by the Liberals and by you, not by 'Old Man Winter' or 'Old Man Summer'... David: can you just finally STOP with your bullsh!t...??"

Phillips said the duration and intensity of cold the region is currently experiencing hasn't been felt since 1970.

(Sleepy-headed reporter forgot to ask if the RECORD cold - which according to Dave Phillips has not had this duration and this intensity for 48 years - was due to man made global warming!!
Because Crooked Catherine McKenna the Lying Liberal would say that it WAS man made!!
What sayeth David? Well, Ryan doth NOT bother to reporteth! Why dost thou NOT reporteth, Ryan, what David sayeth?!? Has Cagey got his climactic claws on yer tongue?!)

Environment Canada's record low for April 2 in Saskatoon is –28 C, which was set in 1954. The temperature there on Monday morning was –21 C."This cold air, it's just entrenched. It's like molasses," Phillips said. "It's filled all the nooks and crannies."

It's quite apparent that David Phillips himself fills in all the voids, all those nooks and crannies, all those inaccuracies, imperfections, prognostications, insinuations, and conflations with layers of his own verbal 'molasses'.

Phillips is Canada's SENIOR climatologist, for gaia's sake - - we OUGHT TO EXPECT MORE (...don't we?) than this typical plate of steamy dung, garnished with a side-order of meaningless gibberish mixed with Cagey's mumbo-jumbo, served on a shallow platter by shallower reporters. Is THAT is the best that Canadian journalism can muster??!

No real journalist should sit through this kind of weaselly BS, and take it seriously from such a one-sided perspective - either the interviewer is in the GreenFear camp already, or they're doing a puffball interview to avoid any confrontation with Cagey - which is it... what is it?!

How is this fake report NOT "SUPPRESSION of science"??!

It certainly is propaganda - the lack of questioning alone puts this report into the fake news category.

Did Ryan's editors at CP forbid him to ask David Phillips about man made climate change?

Did Cagey himself stipulate this as a condition of his interview? Was this a real interview? Because if it was, it was - typically, like the rest of the Cagey Tango saga, pathetic. Or was this a a pre-screened, pre scripted interview, ie, not an 'interview' at all, but planned propaganda??

How can we get these SAME garbage Cagey 'interviews', with the same shallow, pandering template, the same delicate Cagey Tango, performed thousands of times?!

Cagey here blathers to the press that the "polar vortex" is to blame for a cold snap - -yet, the reporter in this interview doesn't bother to ask Cagey if the Polar Vortex is natural or man made!

Was CP paying reporter Ryan to lose consciousness or fall asleep during this 'interview'?

Or was Ryan bound by a written or implied contract to pretend that he had fallen asleep and posted an entire story before awakening?!

I mean... f@cking really... come on!!

Canada's federal Liberal government says that Climate-Change is man made, so when reporters such as Ryan hear Phillips blaming not "man". but instead, blame a polar vortex - why don't they start asking questions??

By blaming the "polar vortex" for creating a cold snap, Cagey has taken the credit AWAY from 'Man" - and THAT goes AGAINST what Turdo and Climate Barbie claim! It CANNOT BE some stupid vortex that should be blamed: according to the GreenFear-pushers, MAN is to blame, for everything!

How did Ryan, CP, and the CBC, manage to sleep their way through all this?! Cagey just revealed to them indirectly that what Turdo's Liberals are peddling is a climate lie; Cagey told them that a polar vortex - not man - was to blame for the prairie cold snap.

Yet the headline was NOT:
"Canada's Senior Climatologist at odds with official Liberal climate change policy"

It was NOT "Canada's Senior Climatologist contradicts official Liberal climate change claims"...

It was NOT "Canada's Senior Climatologist links climate change drivers as being natural, not man made"...

It was NOT "Canada's Senior Climatologist challenges Liberal climate claims that "man" is the driver behind climate change"...
It was NOT "Liberal Prime Minister Turdo infuriated as Canada's Senior Climatologist blames "Old Man Winter" for causing climate-change"... ...see the point?!

Ohhhhhh, how to spin this? How to spin this, to save Cagey Dave from the Wrath Of Turdo?
Oh, wait: how about we say that Old Man Winter is actually a man - ya see? He's real - as real as climate change is real - - - therefore, we can still say - truthfully, ya see? - that climate change is man made!! Old Man Winter did it, and because he is a man, ya see, he can be blamed! So yes, it's true: climate-change is definitely man-made (because as we Liberals have told you, Old Man Winter is a man). If you don't think about it, then it all makes perfect sense, and we can't he accused of lyin' either!! Yes, that'll work perfectly!! Excellent idea, great plan!! Yes, David Phillips can go back to being blameless again!!

TAKE A GOOD LOOK in Chapter 5, at how the Canada's Cagiest Climatologist wormed and twisted his way in 2017 to make it appear that that the polar vortex WAS man made.
Compare what he said to what he's saying here on Apr. 3, 2018. Such slimeball tactics.

Whatever Cagey says, is massaged...

(... oh, what Mr. McLuhan would have had to say about this, about how the medium is not just the message, but that the message itself has been massaged... so the medium is the massaged message, in fact...)
... to NEVER associate back to the climate change hoax. We see it here, yet again. The message is SPUN, shaped and formed; the massage begins even before the reporter is assigned.

Cagey claims that the vortex itself (not man) is to blame... why did the sleepwalking reporter Ryan not bother to question this?

Does this reporter even know - or care - about the opportunity he SQUANDERED by not confronting the lies, the double-speak, the greater deceptions, which surround the issues in his story, transmitted by CBC everywhere?

By having ONE reporter actually digging into what Cagey says, an analytical breakdown and reconstruction of Cagey's weather sputterings could begin.

But, the assessment NEVER occurs - and Ryan here is not the first to be taken for a sordid spin while Cagey has his climactic way. Was this Cagey Tango a consensual act - or is pure, innocent Ryan another of Cagey's climate victims?!

In either case, the readers of Ryan's CP/CBC propaganda are victims of an orchestrated climate-change GreenFear-infected propaganda campaign.

"Dave Phillips likes to say that he has about 30,000 weather stories and believe it or not he’s probably not exaggerating. As the senior climatologist at Environment Canada, Phillips has been in the meteorology game for more than 40 years and during that time he’s amassed a library of crazy weather facts, stories and trivia..."

Yep - and Chris' story could possibly go down in the history book of GreenFear propaganda as being story # 30,001 where David Phillips got away without having to face any challenge about how whatever he's talking about, has anything to do with man made climate change!!

That's over 30,000+ Cagey Tango performances!! And this count is from five years ago - from 2013 ! - and nothing else in the Cagey template has changed except for the increasing story count! There have certainly been several thousand MORE interviews since (Cagey has a voracious appetite to spread his climactic seed) yet, the "Climate Change" aspect of Cagey's blusterings, remain CENSORED; remain VERBOTEN; remain SUPPRESSED; remain UNCHALLENGED! (Remember, as we saw in Chapter 13, how Cagey Dave himself REFUSED 'to go there' refused to go to the "climate change" topic, on a CBC interview !! And this was on a CBC interview, for gaia's sake - they are Cagey's best pals! Who "suppressed" Cagey then, in 2017?!! Still blamin' "Harper"heh heh?! Funny how the CBC didn't blame Trudeau for 'suppressing science', when Turdo's own State Climatologist wouldn't talk about climate change to Turdo's own State Broadcaster..!)

These interviewers eagerly dance around the climate change issue with Cagey, making moves in coordination as if they are talking about climate change; they spin and they twirl, pedalling their two-step climate-shill in unison, as if they were one,until they're sweaty and spent and created another fresh precious sweet little bundle of 'AGW evidence'.

All those decades of sordid dirty dancing; all those mutually-beneficial Cagey Tango 'interviews', yet NO 'man made climate change' evidence!! But sh!tloads of AGW innuendo!!

Here we have a typical Cagey Tango interview, where man made climate change is COMPLETELY IGNORED by the interviewer, Chris Fox!.

Did someone order Chris Fox NOT to mention the subject of climate change to David Phillips?! Was someone suppressing either Chris Fox, or David Phillips, from saying ANYTHING about climate change? Were they being "suppressed " by anyone?

Or were they pulling this off all by themselves??! {Remember back in Chapter 3 how Cagey's pal Phil Chadwick was openly despairing over how somehow Cagey was someone's victim, how Cagey suffered mightily under somekind of "circumstances" which mysteriously prevented Cagey from talking about climate change! This was happily reported by TorStar's Amy Dempsey - no evidence necessary!}

So let's ask again: who in this CP24 report was 'suppressed'; and how?!?! The only thing that can be said, is that they themselves self-censored, they themselves decided to suppress the man made climate change issue - they decided NOT to deal with anything to do with climate change - while interviewing Canada's Senior Climatologist!!!!

COME ON: just LOOK at the massiveness of this GreenFear con job!

The closest to anything related to climate change that Chris Fox bothered to ask was "....we have had lots of extreme weather lately to the point that I have ask if we can even call it extreme at this point. Is it just the new norm?"

Chris Fox didn't specify what he even meant by terms such as 'extreme weather' or 'new norm'. Those were media-created memes which we all were led to believe that are representations OF man made climate change.

David Phillips cagily did not address the specifics of Chris Fox's terminology, which Fox used to lead into his question; Phillips cagily used Chris' assumptions to create this equally non-committal 'answer':

"We have always had extreme weather but it seems more complex now. It beats us up more."

So there you go: what did Chris Fox think he asked Canada's Cagiest Climatologist? And what does Chris think of Cagey's answer - did he actually get an answer to what he thought was his question?! Did Cagey 'satisfy' Fox?

Here's the REST of Cagey's blabbering 'answer':

"...It is almost as if our grandparents were able to deal with that weather. They didn’t have to pick up the kids from daycare, they didn’t have to go to that social meeting and they were more resigned to the weather. But now because we have changed the impacts have changed. There is a sense that the weather is also getting more extreme at the same time, but it is also getting more variable. For farmers in Ontario for example they used to always seem to get the weather they expected and now they are sometimes getting the wettest season followed by the driest. It is almost like normal weather doesn’t occur anymore and we plan everything on normal weather. We build hospitals and schools based on normal weather, we make holiday decisions based on normal weather and the government drafts policy based on normal weather. If it is not normal anymore maybe we are planning for something that’s not going to be the situation and that can cause a problem."

Whaaaat?! What's "normal" when you are listening to Cagey's loquacious verbiage? WOW - and yet, try reading ANY random David Phillips Cagey Climatologist story, and you will see the same bullcrap, the same Cagey Tango, performed every time!

And we still have about 34,853 more Cagey Climatologist stories to get through! We are immediately applying for Canada Research Council, Arts Council, Gaia Council, and TVO/CBC grants, funding, 'gifts', University research grants and endowment funding to continue our work to fully document how climate change issues were presented - and how they were covered-up - by Environment Canada over Cagey's decades!Over 30,000+ interviews, there were tens of thousands of participants playing along with Cagey's Two Step Climate Tango - editors, reporters, media outlets: let's see how the AGW-climate-change-global-warming hoax was presented, how was it characterized and handled by Environment Canada and its employees! This wasn't David Phillips' personal private soap-box to peddle Liberal 'man-made climate change' propaganda!

CHAPTER 33

Let's have a look at the hometown cheer-leading that David Phillips got from the Windsor Star's Sharon Hill (Mar.30, 2018) where the deceptive headline was "Canada's King Of Climatology has Windsor roots", but really, this headline should have properly depicted Phillips as "Canada's King Of Cagey Climatology" .

(...of course, needless to say, but it still has to be pointed out: never was there any question by this lazy reporter asking Cagey about climate change! Funny, eh - you'd think THAT would be a basic question, if a reporter's job was to get at the truth; clearly that was not the case (again) here. The Cagey Tango proceeded as per template requirements, the dirty dance was done, wham bam, no AGW climate change evidence needed.

What's of particular interest is what Phillips said here:

“You know, in a way I am a teacher because my classroom is Canada. My job is to talk to young people, old people, to raise awareness of weather and climate,” Phillips said of his quest to entertain and educate.

“I often feel like I’m the old snake oil salesman. You do that song and dance. You build them up to a fever pitch and then you sell them the bill of goods. You can’t just come in and say I’m going to talk to you about the most important environmental issue humankind has ever faced. They’re going to tune you out. You’ve got to tell them about the weird, wild and wacky weather and then you can sort of ease into it.”

Let's ponder the gravity of Cagey's statement (a statement which he likely meant to be self-effacing, but which in fact was a self-realized admission): Cagey by now well knows that he IS a snake oil salesman!! He's making this statement to Hill, in a way as if this wasn't his real persona, but that he's aware of the perception - - but what is happening here, is that David Phillips has clearly realized - AND PROJECTED - his own persona here! It's not a stereotype of someone else he's talking about: it's a description of HIMSELF.

It's quite revealing.

Of course Cagey is a "snake oil salesman"!

Of course Phillips does his "song and dance" - - there's even a name for the scam: The Cagey Two Step Climate Tango - a ritual publicly performed with many willing partners over 30,000 feverish times.

And when Phillips says bluntly "and then you sell them the bill of goods" , does Cagey even understand what a "bill of goods" actually is, and what it means when one says "You're selling them a bill of goods"?? WTF?!

It means that you are running a bait-and-switch scheme, that you're a fraud artist, a con man, a grifter, a hustler: it means you are selling someone a bill of goods - - WITHOUT any intention of actually delivering those goods.

It's amazing that Cagey is able to so clearly recognize what he's helping Canada's Liberals do here! He's not just "talking" here, or "educating hahaha" here - he's a crucial part of the hustle needed to pull off the con; he's the trusty ole face on the TV with all that goofy homey bullshit weather patter: all the while, he's a charlatan actively participating in a political GreenFear con.

The victims hand their money to the scammer, but all that they get, is just their bill - nothing else!They get their bill listing 'the goods' they supposedly bought - but those goods never actually materialize.This a fitting and appropriate description of the entire AGW climate con.

It's a fake promise, an empty promise, just jive talk, without the goods to back it up, meant to be a scam from the start - pay da carbon tax now, suckah... maybe you'll see some 'result' in 3,000 years.

As we saw in Chapter 5, and many other examples, David Phillips is selling a PRETENSE, an "appearance", an "impression", a "story", a '"thought", a "possibility", an "idea" that he is talking about MAN MADE climate change - without having any evidence for it.

We've been sold a bill of goods by David Phillips on at least 30, 000 occasions, by the looks of it. He performs a clever tightrope act. His "I’m going to talk to you about the most important environmental issue humankind has ever faced"trope is tiresome and repetitive, a scripted UN Agenda 21 meme he uses frequently, which reeks of GreenFear - see Chapter 28.

He's a shameless smooth-talking, climate hustlin' shaman who's sold a LOT of bills of goods with his climate mumbo-jumbo. He uses these tactics with an ulterior purpose to further a political agenda: to create an impression that governments can control the climate, because climate is man made, not natural; that all the weather events we see, are not natural, but man made - this is an absurd piece of manipulative pseudo- scientific conceit. So, what right does this devious government employee have, to act as some kind of 'teacher' {a propagandist}with his own private curriculum and personal agenda, acting some kind of phony 'entertainer' peddling his GreenFear-laden insidious personal beliefs without sanction nor evidence? Since when is it Cagey's job to act as an entertainer soft-selling climate change deceptions?

It's a devious approach, and thankfully, David Phillip has now himself come clean with his duplicity.Sharon Hill's real headline should have been "Canada's Cagiest Climatologist admits shilling 'man-made climate-change', without substantiated evidence".