Democrats are above the law. Most of them are rapists, thieves and murderers, and many of them are openly guilty of genocide.Dont you see, these are virtues for a Democrat. Like pedophilia. Its what that party selects people on.

The big thing is still that hoggla-roo wasnt prosecuted.But yeah to prosecute one of these nazis inevitably enthuses their base.

Trump is always putting bigger interests ahead of smaller ones, even if the smaller ones are epic in scope as well.

His election was like a janitor showing up in a much used stalls after fifty years. Much work to be done.

Reminds me of my cleaning job at the dead-sea spa. I was hated so much that I was banished to clean a bathroom all the way in the back of the complex, and I needed a pickaxe to get started. True story.

Leave Trump alone there with his pickaxe. He is at absolute full capacity.

What I'm sayin is, as the enemy starts to expose himself because Trump is so effective, people need to start picking up the slack.

I think a lot of republicans are just stunned and kinda frozen in place, both at how unexpected Trump's victories are and how weird the socialists' actions are, and they are not seeing all the bounty Trump is leaving in his wake.

He's like the main body of the army, making the enemy flee. If you don't sue the enemy, he regroups and comes back. Jordan is Jordan, but get started already with the fucking lawsuits.

Start a sue Muller go fund me, a sue Pelosi. They are breaking the law brazenly, and not out of cockyness but out of tactical necessity, Trump isn't giving them space to breathe. I bet you Pelosi fucking hates the positions she is being forced to take.

The important thing about Trump is that his work is structural. So too then does the support for Trump have to be. If you make anti-democratic globalism pay for its illegalities, illegalities in the context of democracy, then you start structurally purging it, purging socialism and all things totalitarian.

Hey not trying to take sides here, but Trump publicly called for wikileaks to release classified and stolen information about Clinton. Politics aside, it does kind of line up with the OP here. Should a politician be publicly calling for people to break the law?

You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.

Also you gotta be careful with the Brietbart stuff. Steve Bannon is famous for spinning his news very hard to the right. Not saying that right or left is right, but the source here is famously biased. He's done anti-Semitic stuff, he's aligned with the white nationalist types, he's sympathized with violent people who've gone out and done crazy shit in the streets, and when Trump first took office he was an adviser put there by the Mercers to sort of steer things in that radical direction. Not saying that the article is true or false, just that the source is incredibly suspicious.

You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.

Start a sue Muller go fund me, a sue Pelosi. They are breaking the law brazenly, and not out of cockyness but out of tactical necessity, Trump isn't giving them space to breathe. I bet you Pelosi fucking hates the positions she is being forced to take.

Sue the bitch.

Also that gofundme was shut down and the money returned because it only raised 20 million and didn't meet the goal.

You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.

I dunno, I was gonna answer point by point but... I honestly feel that if you don't understand what I'm saying, it's because you don't want to.

I will say, neither I nor anybody that reads Breitbart have any illusions about them being some kind of a-political fact source. What we appreciate about them is that they recognize the bias and endeavour, within that, to present you with all the relevant facts in their original contexts. Perfect? Who knows. Far, far superior to any other news source, that is for certain. They take a true geek approach to news.

What you really gotta be careful with is that CBS stuff.

All that white supremacy, anti-semitism stuff you allege, I'll take it with the same massive grain of salt as I do when people call Trump a racist. It's almost like it's on purpose intended as a joke.

Unlike modern socialism, and here I do mean when its self-described (and that already by itself has more clout than even Trump himself) , where it is routine for actual anti-semitism, the kind where people will literally say things Nazis used to say that I won't repeat, to be treated as normal, like universal human rights or redistribution of wealth.

Pedro I Rengel wrote:I think a lot of republicans are just stunned and kinda frozen in place, both at how unexpected Trump's victories are and how weird the socialists' actions are, and they are not seeing all the bounty Trump is leaving in his wake.

He's like the main body of the army, making the enemy flee. If you don't sue the enemy, he regroups and comes back. Jordan is Jordan, but get started already with the fucking lawsuits.

I can't say you're wrong.

Just that Pelosi isn't hanging so low maybe. I get the impression she is connected in actually scary ways.

Pedro I Rengel wrote:The important thing about Trump is that his work is structural. So too then does the support for Trump have to be. If you make anti-democratic globalism pay for its illegalities, illegalities in the context of democracy, then you start structurally purging it, purging socialism and all things totalitarian.

Mr Reasonable wrote:Also you gotta be careful with the Brietbart stuff. Steve Bannon is famous for spinning his news very hard to the right. Not saying that right or left is right, but the source here is famously biased. He's done anti-Semitic stuff, he's aligned with the white nationalist types, he's sympathized with violent people who've gone out and done crazy shit in the streets, and when Trump first took office he was an adviser put there by the Mercers to sort of steer things in that radical direction. Not saying that the article is true or false, just that the source is incredibly suspicious.

Dude we free people do our own research. No one who is half sane uses news outlets the way you lefties do.

Brietbart is a site that reports what you don't want reported. It is valuable. But I reported that stuff from experience over a decade ago.

Mr Reasonable wrote:Also you gotta be careful with the Brietbart stuff. Steve Bannon is famous for spinning his news very hard to the right. Not saying that right or left is right, but the source here is famously biased. He's done anti-Semitic stuff, he's aligned with the white nationalist types, he's sympathized with violent people who've gone out and done crazy shit in the streets, and when Trump first took office he was an adviser put there by the Mercers to sort of steer things in that radical direction. Not saying that the article is true or false, just that the source is incredibly suspicious.

Dude we free people do our own research. No one who is half sane uses news outlets the way you lefties do.

Brietbart is a site that reports what you don't want reported. It is valuable. But I reported that stuff from experience over a decade ago.

Why am I a leftie? Because I call a spade a spade?

You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.