Check out the redacted document and tables in and at the end of the article.

Seneff: “This is an excellent article by James Lyons Weiler on why "science" can no longer be trusted to be valid.”

Fake Science: When is Medical “Science” Not Science?

WE HAVE BEEN WARNED by our government and by specific social media outlets that much of the “news” we read online falls into a category of “Fake News”. This warning has been identified as a very real threat to the freedom of expression and a move toward censorship. I have witnessed first-hand how facts have been obliterated by government officials at press conferences, in testimony fake-news to Congress, and in conference calls to the scientific community.

Throughout my scientific career, I have championed objectivity, first-hand, with hands-on data, data analysis plans, study designs, reporting, writing papers, publishing, participating on NIH grant review panels, conducting peer review on studies submitted to dozens of different journals. I served as founding Editor-in-Chief on a journal that was my brain child, and led a dozen or so of the Editorial Board in a threat of mass resignation against the publisher if they weakened the peer-review system I had established. (I learned later that the idea came from a sick, jealous colleague of mine, who wished to weaken the journal). To the publisher’s credit, he saw wisdom in keeping a blind peer-review process, and both the journal, and the online, open-access publisher, are thriving.

The appearance of news foretelling future censorship of so-called “Fake News” on social media is chilling. But it raises an interesting question: what about Fake Science? If the corporate masters wish to dictate what “news” we know, will our benevolent information screeners allow Science to proceed unabated? What would Fake Science look like? And how would we know?

Having been trained every year for 16 years on the standards for regulatory compliance of proper conduct of science, and having taught courses on research study designs and research ethics, I have a fairly granular view on Fake Science. To understand what Fake Science would look like, we could start with funding agendas.

Every year, the Federal Budget is constructed in a manner that is supposed to provide funding (immense amounts of funding) to agencies that conduct research, and that fund extramural research studies at Universities, Medical Research Centers, and the like. This funding often comes in the form of earmarks to fund research on specific public health concerns, such as cancer. However, the Senate does not like to be involved in deciding the specific types of studies, nor the focus of the studies, to be conducted. They have repeatedly stated that they would prefer to leave it up to “the Scientists”. In reality, however, it is often left up to the agenda of the agencies, rather than the full population of scientists who might apply. Much of it is never made available to extramural, independent researchers – and the process of securing funding for research within (intramural) research areas is ridiculously simple, and often lack rigor. Thus, science designed “to demonstrate” on point or “to disprove” another is inherently biased, and tends to fulfill policy, not scientific needs. Let’s look at the various levels of control by which public policy is infused into, or in some cases, obliterates, bona fide science and replaces it with Fake Science.

Bias #1. Piracy: Regulatory Capture of Agencies

When corporations send people to secure high-ranking positions within agencies, the process is called “Regulatory Capture”. When this occurs, it can alter the science that gets conducted in three important ways. The first is in the determination of what area(s) get prioritized in the large but finite budget. The second is the in the determination of the types of studies (randomized clinical trials, retrospective studies, animal studies, translational studies) that are given priority. If essential areas of research are not funded, then specific, important questions (Do cigarettes cause cancer? Is ADHD overdiagnosed? Do pesticides cause cancer in humans?) are never asked. And if earmarked dollars specify an area of research, the captured agency can still manipulate the types of questions that can be asked, either directly, or by restricting the type(s) of studies for which the funding will be allowed to be used. If the questions are particularly gnarly, with big consequences for corporations, they might even dispense with extramural funding altogether, and instead conduct all of the research in-house, where it can be more easily managed and controlled.

Let’s say some plug of funding escapes an agency, and makes it way into an independent researcher’s budget. They are funded after a process of peer-review, managed by the funding agency, many times in response to specific calls for proposals, or program announcements. Sometimes a cabal of scientists will work to review each other’s grants, and turf competitors’ grant applications with harsh reviews. The NIH has a process in which a huge percentage of the grant applications are “triaged” – returned without further review – because a superficial review found them not worthy of being carried forward. This is ostensibly a time-saving step; however, it can readily be used to send back grant applications that ask the “wrong” questions. I have witnessed this first hand while serving on an NIH review panel. One particularly aggressive reviewer claimed (without evidence) that their competitor must have “made up” the data in their grant proposal. Naturally, I asked them if they had any independent evidence other than their level of disbelief in the outcome of the study. He had none.

The Philosopher Karl Popper, father of falsificationism, taught us that the degree to which we are surprised by the outcome of an honest critical test of a hypothesis is correlated to karl-popper-open-society the degree to which the hypothesis has been corroborated by surviving the test. One should not use background knowledge to dispense with the corroboration afforded a hypothesis, it’s the other way around: our background knowledge may in fact need to be updated when the outcome of the test does not falsify the hypotheses, and our degree of surprise should point us to look closely at our background and our collective knowledge.

Scientific journals should pride themselves on being objective sources of knowledge. To have a study published in a scientific journal (usually) means that it has survived a rigorous process of peer-review, by people who have (by design) no known conflicts of interest that would work in favor of, or against, acceptance or rejection of a particular study they have been invited to review. This process should never be influenced by nor controlled by the authors of the manuscript (although journals often ask study authors for 2-3 names of potential reviewers, there is no guarantee that those suggested will be utilized).

That said, studies can be harshly critiqued by competitors, or, worse, entire journals can be, like agencies, wholly owned subsidiaries of corporations. They can be overtly captured, say via movement of people into Editors-in-Chief positions, or they can become owned more subtly, for example, via research program funding of the Editors-in-Chief by corporations, or by advertisement funds directly to the Journal.

Lately, a very disturbing trend has emerged in which studies that have found risk associated with corporate-owned medical products have been set upon by ostensibly well-intentioned denizens of the internet – the bloggist, or people with email who issue an “expression of concern”. With identities sometimes obscured, and pandering their presumed monopoly on scientific virtue with referential terms in their avatar or names, or their blog’s title (usually with terms referencing skepticism, reason, rationality… or some combination thereof), these individual set upon a peer-reviewed, published study with a frenzy and with a fine-tooth comb specifically seeking any minor flaw, or potential flaw in the study design, its implementation, or the author’s interpretation. Invariably, something is found – it is unlikely that any published study given a complete vivisection could ever be found that was completely flawless – and they amplify the significance of the flaw first in terms of its impact on the study conclusion. This is followed by a scorched-earth tactic in which they claim that if this study, which had been published previously, is allowed to exist unscathed, it will bring about fire and brimstone of plague and pestilence on the earth never seen before.

Nowhere in their communications do they reference the Journal’s stated policies for retraction. Authors of studies enduring such attack should reference the Journal’s stated policies for grounds for retraction when mounting their defense (if given the opportunity to do so).

This tactic has become so ridiculous that a study that was scheduled to be published after a first course of peer review was recently turfed by one journal due to few strongly-worded tweets encouraging scientists to take their papers to other journals unless a specific paper a Tweeter happened to not like is not retracted. If Science is to survive in the new Corporatocracy, this practice must be met with strongly worded letters to the deciding Editor by the Editorial Board with threats of mass resignation and counter-boycott, if necessary. An Editorial Board must stand by the Journal’s peer-review process, and the Journal must stand by the outcome of that process. To do otherwise is to allow Corporations to sanitize the literature of what they deem to be “problematic” studies, one study at a time.

As an exercise in serving them their own medicine, I and co-authors recently found seven fatal flaws in a study by Zerbo et al. that originally found association of autism with vaccines given the first trimester, until they lost the association via statistical shamwizardry (a term I coined in “Cures vs. Profits”).

Once the scientific literature has been sanitized of any studies that could show harm for a corporation’s product, someone is funded (usually by the corporation with financial interest) to conduct a special type of study called a meta-analysis. In a meta-analysis, a supposedly unbiased sample of available studies are pulled together, and their statistical analyses and results condensed into one, large conclusion. Well, if the previous four biases were not enough to sanitize the literature, there is always obfuscation by combining studies of different types, or rejection of studies with significant effects for having too small sample sizes – even though the positive result already demonstrated sufficient power at the sample size at which the study was conducted. The meta-analysis then finds no overall significant negative effect, and is cited as being “the largest study to date”, based on “over a million patients”, both of which are non-sequitur descriptors of meta-analyses, and are therefore patently untrue. One hundred poorly designed, under-powered studies that found no significant negative effect will result in one large meta-analysis that conclude no significant effect – so the citation of hundreds of thousands of patients involved in a meta-analysis does not imply increased power.

Bias #6. Flawed Medical Education and Kick-Backs

Medical education programs that are based on an intrinsically biased scientific literature are harmful to medicine, because they fail to transmit the full body of knowledge that exists on, say, risks of harms, serious adverse events, etc. to practitioners of medicine. Well before receipt of their degree, medical professionals are bombarded with messages of the utility and efficacy of certain drugs and medical procedures – and they learn that even though it is illegal for individual medical doctors to receive kickbacks to incentivize specific medical options, their practices can be given significant kick-backs (monetary incentives) or selecting the medical options being promoted by very wealthy corporations.

There are ethical individuals, such as the 80% of opthamologists who refuse to use Avastin to treat patients when Lucentis is clearly a clinically equivalent drug (see See Andrew Lam’s 2015 Commentary in the Chicago Tribune: Why do doctors choose a $2,000 cure when a $50 one is just as good?).

Those with clear vision will see, as I point out in “Cures vs. Profits”, that the profit motive thereby has a dramatically homogenizing effect on medicine – all for one, not one for any. This homogenization effect restricts the freedom of choice to the health care consumer, whose options are preselected by what the law has referred to as “learned intermediaries” led by industry cheerleaders called “Key Opinion Leaders” who spin the positive and further minimize the negative consequences of a drug or medical procedure they are peddling. [See See Carl Elliott’s “The Secret Lives of Big Pharma’s ‘Thought Leaders”, Chronicle of Higher Education, 2010].

Bias #7. Failure of Duty to Warn, Neglect of Rights to Informed Consent

Seven minutes, per patient, $400 per fully vaccinated child. Those two numbers should stick in your head. Pharmaceutical companies incentivize doctor’s practices with $400 per fully vaccinated pediatric patient – and yet the goal for an entire well-child visit is seven minutes. Health care providers shame parents who ask questions about vaccine risk by putting down “those crazy anti-vaxxers”. Each and every time a health provider fails to give a patient, or their parent, a vaccine information sheet, that patient/parent pair is being denied the right to informed consent. The pressure to restrict each well-child visit to seven minutes is to ensure as many patients are seen as possible, increasing the practice’s profit. In 2016, the AAP encouraged its members to refuse medical care to children whose parents ask too many questions – the threat of which by any definition is “coercion”.

Informed consent laws and rights exist, are enforceable, and the very point of consent procedures is to limit deception and coercion and exploitation. Our modern culture of respect for informed consent derives in part from the cruelty of Nazi experiments, which led to the Nuremberg Code of research ethics, which stipulated, “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential”. Vaccines, of course, are on ongoing clinical trial, the safety of which is assessed via post-market surveillance.

Which explains why the 21st Century Cures Act has made is possible for those conducting medical experiments to enroll any American citizen in a clinical trial – without their consent – as long as those conducting the trial can convince their IRB the risk is minimal. According to the interpretive summary,

“(Sec. 2263) Clinical testing of medical devices or drugs no longer requires the informed consent of the subjects if the testing poses no more than minimal risk and includes safeguards.”

Rational analysis of the change in the wording points to an attempt at a CYA over retrospective vaccine safety studies. It seems unlikely that the 21st Century Cures obliteration of informed consent will ever be invoked. Clearly, the clause in the 21st Century Cures Act cannot apply to any American because the risk to those enrolled in clinical trials cannot be known until the conclusion of the trial. There remains a very large body of regulation and rules that exists that guarantees informed consent.

Vaccine information sheets exists because parents do not always even know which questions to ask. If you are a parent of a vaccinated child, and you were not handed a physical copy of the Vaccine Information Sheets from the CDC for each and every vaccine administered to your child, you have been denied your right to informed consent under the law. You may find that your doctor cannot or will not answer straightforward questions about vaccine safety, such as those provided to parents by The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (see IPAK Informed Consent Flyer).

Bias #8. News Media Blackout

Those following the story of Ebola will recall how, after daily stories of the drama unfolding that could kill the world, the news media suddenly stopped reporting on Ebola. This was the direct result of the White House asking the Associated Press to stop reporting on suspected cases returning from countries in which Ebola was circulating in their populations. You will also notice that I managed to find 2,000 studies in Pubmed to read that show the specific mechanisms that cause vaccines to induce encephalopathy-mediated autism in some people, yet the press is extremely reluctant to cover new studies that support the link between vaccines and autism. It took Robert De Niro’s pulling of the movie “VAXXED” from the Tribeca Film Festival to get the media to pay attention to a film produced by Del Bigtree, the former producer of the television show “The Doctors”. This, in spite of the appearance of two celebrity medical doctors who changed their views on the autism/vaccine issue upon being shown the evidence that Dr. William Thompson provided to Dr. Brian Hooker showing that CDC sanitized the results of a key report that was to made to the Institutes of Medicine during their consideration of the available science on vaccines and autism.

Of course, news media outlets are more than happy to carry forward the party line about a drug or medical procedure as long as the Direct-to-Consumer advertising fees keep streaming in from Pharma. When confronted with ANY new study showing any connection between vaccines and autism, they don their cloak, and beat themselves about the head with wooden planks with their Gregorian Chant:

Watch VAXXED and let Dr. Wakefield tell you himself what he concluded in his study, which was retracted after a reporter – not a scientist – alleged impropriety in study design approval. Which, by the way, is precisely one of the complaints of the CDC Whistleblower about the CDC studies conducted to disprove Wakefield’s hypothesis.

Bias #9. Government Agency Censorship of Informed American Citizens

By law, the CDC must collect public comments during a period of time before issuing new rulings on changes to Vaccine Information Sheets. Having read the Vaccine Information Sheets for accuracy and completeness for another project, I was aware of the deficiencies 3in the MMR and MMR-V sheets. I was therefore astonished to read comments from certain well-known anti-vaccine risk awareness individuals that called, specifically, for a weakening for the MMR and MMR-V information sheets. An associate of mine and I prepared a joint comment, and a rebuttal to the dangerous call for less information on risk in the vaccine information sheets, and we waited.

After some 300 comments had appeared, our own, and another associate’s comment had not appeared. Finally, on December 23, 2016, our comment and rebuttal appeared, but altered. Key sections of both our comment, and of our rebuttal to the individuals calling for weakened information on risk had been redacted. The content of these comments are the subject of pending litigation.

Fake science would involve biased science funding agendas, regulatory capture of agencies, conflicts of interest, willful ignorance of risk, failure of duty to warn, profit pressures, media blackouts, and government censorship of private citizens. And that’s just in 2016.

Now you know why you think you know that vaccines do not cause autism.

And if you genuinely persist in your “knowledge”, in spite of this evidence of bias, I’ll point out the clearest evidence that exists that you do not know what you’re talking about. If you persist in your position that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism”, I say to you: How do you know? In spite of what you think you know, not all vaccines have been studied for a link to autism, and some studies do, in fact, exist that have found association.

New York State: HPV Vaccination for Minors WITHOUT Parental Consent Now Legal

In a stealth operation, the New York State Department of Health passed a regulation (5/18/16 N.Y. St. Reg. HLT-47-15-00003-A) that allows children in New York to be injected with the human papilloma virus vaccine without parental knowledge or consent. If they think they have the authority to do this for HPV then why won't they think they have the authority to authorize any medical procedure without parental knowledge or consent?

Please fight back to regain your rights.

Call or email Governor Andrew Cuomo and ask him to rescind the regulation. (518) 474-8390

February 06, 2017 04:04 pm Chris Crawford – The CDC and its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), together with the AAFP and other medical professional organizations, have released the 2017 adult and childhood immunization schedules.

Changes this year include updated recommendations for a two-dose schedule of nine-valent HPV vaccine (HPV9; Gardasil 9) for patients ages 11-12, a two-dose schedule of meningitis B vaccine (MenB) for adolescents, a clarification regarding recommended adult candidates for hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine and revisions designed to make the adult schedule easier to navigate.

Release of the annual immunization schedules comes amid concerns that the Trump administration has proposed appointing a group to study the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.

“I asked all of the leaders of advocacy groups in CA where they think they went wrong. How did sb277 pass? Everyone gave me the same answer: not enough parents spoke out and got involved before it passed. We are where they were not too long ago. We are facing the same legislature. What are you doing about it?”

After 20 years of living with this horrible disease, my dad recently passed away from Alzheimer's. His disease and death have changed the trajectory of my life. I went about trying to find what could have influenced the onset of the disease and found many studies in the scientific literature linking Mercury to Alzheimer's. I ended up creating an Oscar qualifying documentary, Evidence of Harm on the subject. I'm giving away FREE online access to over two hours of bonus material to anyone who is interested in learning about the links between #MERCURY and Alzheimer's disease.

https://evidenceofharm.vhx.tv/…/evidence-of-harm-bonus-foot…

CDC Admits 98 Million Americans Were Given Cancer Virus Via The Polio Shot

"To further confirm this unbelievable admission, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago Dr. Michele Carbone has been able to independently verify the presence of the SV40 virus in tissue and bone samples from patients who died during that era. He found that 33% of the samples with osteosarcoma bone cancers, 40% of other bone cancers, and 60% of the mesothelioma’s lung cancers all contained this obscure virus. This leaves the postulation that upwards of 10–30 million actually contracted and were adversely affected by this virus, to be deadly accurate."

JLW: Is there anything else you would like the general public to know?

AG: The only things I can say is be properly informed and always ask for the evidence of what you hear say. Always read the leaflets that are mandatorily contained in the vaccine packaging and that the doctor is obliged to make you read. Always pose all the questions that you feel like posing, and do not be satisfied if they do not really respond to everything you want to know. Never make acts of faith and never trust who do. Don’t ever give your health, and the health of your children, to anyone.

According to Kimberlin, “The science proving the safety of vaccination is settled and does not need to be investigated again.” But if it’s settled, where are the studies?

Where’s the research showing that 50 doses of 14 vaccines administered to children in combination and repeatedly in the first six years of life equals long-term health and results in few, if any, problems? What are the multi-generational effects to the immune system with so many vaccine doses?

The sad fact is the often repeated mantra that vaccines are absolutely safe and that there is nothing to worry about is a case of thinking that if a falsehood is repeated over and over again, and long enough, people will believe it’s true.

Why are vaccine proponents so terrified of an honest vaccine safety review? This in and of itself raises serious questions.

Another fact that should give everyone pause is the witch hunt unleashed on anyone who dares to question the never-proven-hypothesis that vaccines are so unequivocally safe and beneficial for everyone that everyone should be forced, by law, to get vaccinated with every government-recommended vaccine.

Almost No Medical Condition Qualifies for Medical Vaccine Exemption - Blackmail and the Medical Vaccine Exemption By Barbara Loe Fisher

Vaccine risks for you or your child can range from zero to 100 percent depending upon the genes you were born with; your microbiome DNA; the environment you live in; your age and health at the time of vaccination, and the type and how many vaccines you get. 1 2

Vaccines are not safe or effective for everyone because we are not all the same and we do not all respond the same way to pharmaceutical products like vaccines. 3 4

Seneff: “Turns out vaccines are contaminated with several other dangerous substances besides glyphosate, including red blood cells, chromium and lead.”

Dirty Vaccines: Every Human Vaccine Tested Was Contaminated With Metals and Debris in New Study

Many of the vaccines contained iron and iron alloys which, according to the researchers, “can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues”.

The researchers supply an image of an area in a drop of Sanofi Pasteur MSD’s Repevax (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio) vaccine “where the morphology of red cells - we cannot tell whether they are human or animal- is clearly visible” along with the presence of “debris” composed of aluminum, bromine, silicon, potassium and titanium.

Many of the vaccines contained iron and iron alloys which, according to the researchers, “can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues”.

The researchers supply an image of an area in a drop of Sanofi Pasteur MSD’s Repevax (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio) vaccine “where the morphology of red cells - we cannot tell whether they are human or animal- is clearly visible” along with the presence of “debris” composed of aluminum, bromine, silicon, potassium and titanium.

De Serres told STAT “Do we have scientific data supporting that [forcing flu shots on health care workers]? I think the bottom line of our paper is to say there is no valid scientific evidence, even now, underpinning enforced health care worker immunizations.”

Seneff: “Informative new article on mercury in vaccines. And on the politics around RFK, Jr.'s work on mercury.”

The Unvarnished Truth About Mercury In Vaccines: Not One Modern Safety Test Has Ever Been Done

Just 10 years ago, Kennedy wrote an article entitled, “Deadly Immunity” that ran in Rolling Stone and Salon.com, addressing and detailing scientific evidence linking thimerosal (50 percent mercury) to an outright epidemic of neurological disorders, including autism, in thousands of American children.

Now, the science is piling up overwhelmingly, with hundreds of peer-reviewed studies supporting the link. Still, shill journalists and scientific hucksters that front for the vaccine industry and pharma head up their usual character assassination attempts and full-on propaganda campaigns every time the actual science begins to speak for itself, revealing 75 years of lies about the safety of mercury in immunizations.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a national vaccine safety surveillance program co-sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS is a post-marketing safety surveillance program, collecting information about adverse events (possible side effects) that occur after the administration of vaccines licensed for use in the United States.

Because I have researched what is known about the immune system in different phases of life, my conclusion is that there is no hope for safe vaccines.

But go ahead and do the research into "safe vaccines". If it is done properly, the CDC and presidential commission will come to the same determination.

What does safe mean to you? To me it means that the short and long term outcomes of the injection will be the same or better than doing no vaccine and no injection at all. This hypothesis regarding safe vaccines has yet to be tested. So until it is tested properly, the concept of safe vaccines is but a dream.

Suzanne Humphries MD - Risingfromthedead.com

After reading her first book, Dissolving Illusions, which was an excellent and evidence-based look at the history of vaccines and disease, I knew I had to read this book as well. It did not disappoint- it actually arrived right before a vacation, so I had the time to finish it within about 4 days.

Suzanne Humphries went from being a nurse's aide in a nursing home to a medical doctor and kidney specialist. She met many wonderful doctors and nurses along the way but also saw firsthand many abuses from doctors, nurses, other hospital workers, and within the system itself. She was having trouble reconciling the training she was receiving with the health of her patients, which seemed to get worse not better under the rigid "gold standard" of medical care.

After earning her degree and finishing her residency, she found that even as an official "expert" she still had very limited ability to do what she thought was best for her patients, based on her experience, her education, and what the evidence says in mainstream medical literature. She was shackled to the "gold standard" that mostly meant more drugs, more vaccines, more antibiotics, and worsening health. She eventually moved to another state to work in a place that she loved and where she stayed for many years. But even there, she experienced the abuse of merciless one-size-fits-all hospital policies that would not allow room for independent thought or even common sense.

She was also shackled to the half-million dollars of medical school debt she had accrued which were coming due. She had little choice but to do as was expected, rather than the very best that she felt could have been done for patients, just to stay afloat. And at the same time, she felt dead and dying on the inside herself.

On another front, Dr. Suzanne was going through a spiritual journey. She saw flaws and conflicts within the Catholic Church system where she went to school as a child, so during her college and medical school years, she was an atheist and hostile toward Christianity. But she felt empty and dead inside spiritually, so she sought the guidance of a New Age/Hindu shaman that she calls “Medicine Man”. He had an eclectic, mystical form of spirituality that seemed to be open and inclusive toward all religions. After years of weekly meetings with him and a small group of other followers, however, she began to catch Medicine Man in inconsistencies or outright lies. And besides that, she continued to feel dead spiritually, no better after 10 years than when she started.

At the same time as her disillusionment with Medicine Man, she faced a very difficult situation with her mother that finally pushed her to take her spiritual life seriously. She started asking tough questions of a trusted friend along with seeking out answers for herself. She finally had no more questions and had to act upon her new belief. What happened was life-changing. Not only was she able to do what was needed for her mother, but her whole life transformed in many other ways. Best of all, she was both at peace and finally alive again-“risen from the dead”- in her heart. (Read the book for details!)

In her medical practice, Suzanne had been able to pay off all of her student loans, so she was free of the “golden handcuffs” that pin so many doctors down. She had come to a sticking point where she could no longer continue to work at the job she had once loved. The hospital where she worked wanted very sick patients to be vaccinated on the day of admission, even people in the middle of a stroke! She brought the problem to the attention of the administration but was ignored and contradicted even though her professional advice had always been heeded before.

So she left for a journey to find out what she didn’t know and to re-learn what she thought she knew, all based on history, biology, statistics, scientific studies, and medical journals. She has now written an excellent book (together with Roman Bystryanic) called Dissolving Illusions, lectures throughout the world, operates a private general practice, and continues learning everything she can to really help heal and even cure her patients.

Dr. Suzanne is very open and (sometimes brutally) honest about what goes on in medical school, in hospitals, during surgeries, and in the minds and hearts of doctors. She talks about the depression that so many of them face, brought on by staggering student loan debts and mindless hospital policies and “gold standards”. This leads to a suicide rate higher than the general population among doctors, and patient care by people who are unwell themselves.

She touches on several other topics in the book that she has been researching. These include the importance of babies being born vaginally (not via c-section), delayed cord-clamping, breastfeeding, forgoing vaccines, using vitamin C, the importance of bacteria, and using antibiotics and pharmaceutical drugs only sparingly. She includes some specific examples of people who have been in her practice or have written to her and their stories, as well as the voices of other doctors and nurses who have reached out to her. She explains why we often cannot trust the “scientific studies” on pharmaceutical drugs and points out that many doctors do not report negative vaccine reactions because they don’t even know that a reporting system exists!

I hope Dr. Suzanne continues to research and write more individual books for each topic that she mentions in this one.

A great read for anyone in the medical profession (and especially anyone considering going into the medical profession) and anyone who wants the best of health for their family.

Measles Vaccine Scandal: World Governments Have Known It Can Cause Neurological Disorders Since 1970

Referring to the Harrison’s paper on SSPE, [7] a document used to teach internal medicine to medical students all over the world, Dr. Carley says that it is clear that what is being described is in fact autism. In fact, if you read the Harrison’s 10th Edition published in 1983, four years before the ARVI meeting, it states that SSPE can be caused by the measles vaccine.

Look on my website, www.protectthepets.com . Many vets joined the movement and signed up to protect the pets. At least they took a step to recognize the problems in our industry. Hopefully some have a like heart. More will join in time and then you the public will have a directory for "safe vets" . Doc

Dr. Suzanne Humphries is a practicing nephrologist (kidney physician). In this lecture (video below), she addresses a study done in Croatia [1] where a child who was vaccinated with the MMR vaccine was tested positive for the measles vaccine strain Schwarz eight days after vaccination.

I am a nurse and reading his book is a breath of fresh air to me, I am so sick and tired of my profession and the denial and disdain from the doctors I work with regarding this issue. I work with juveniles in a correctional facility and I have seen what Dr. Moulton describes many times over and I am sickened by what I now know is the damage done by those of us in allopathic medicine. I am now not willing any longer to follow the directive to give one more child a vaccine or flu shot, so the time has come to leave my profession. I am so sad and ashamed to be part of this sham any longer. My hope is that I will be able to get this information out to people and give parents the support to make an informed decision. What courage this man had, I am in awe and so grateful for his tenacity and dedication to researching this subject at great cost to himself, he is my hero. Please read this book and get his message out to anyone who is willing to hear it. Gloria Hostetler RN

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations: Should Their Views be Silenced? Kindle Edition

As a pediatrician I'm so glad to read about other docs who are not blindly pushing a flawed vaccine product and schedule on patients. There must be accountability for vaccine injuries and they mustn't be mandatory so the informed consent is preserved. We all need more information and extremist docs who use guilt to force vaccines on patients will come to appreciate informed consent once accountability is restored.

This guidance document provides basic broad principles for a spokesperson of any health authority on how to respond to vocal vaccine deniers. The suggestions are based on psychological research on persuasion,on research in public health, communication studies and on WHO risk communication guidelines.

Yale University Study Shows Association Between Vaccines and Brain Disorders By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Previous scientific studies have shown that when an immune reaction causes inflammation, it can negatively affect the brain.

So it is scientifically plausible and more than reasonable to investigate whether vaccination itself, which provokes inflammation, may also negatively affect the brain.

I agree with these researchers that the correlation between anorexia, OCD, tic disorder, anxiety disorder and vaccinations warrants further scrutiny. This study suggests that the seemingly inexplicable increase we have seen in brain disorders among young children may not be so mysterious after all.

There are literally over 100 bills filed that need your support or opposition! PLEASE LOG IN TO http://NVICAdvocacy.org for more detailed information including links to the bills themselves. Please understand that we are analyzing bills and updating the NVIC Advocacy Portal multiple times a day and this information changes daily so log in often. Use this resource to find out what is going on in your state and what you can do to help.

Here is a breakdown of the types of bills filed that we are tracking as of 2/7/17.

On a side note, Repevax is one nasty vaccine. In addition to the large particle named above, the vaccine contains diphtheria and tetanus toxoid, 4-in-1 pertussis antigens, and three polio viruses. The vaccine is produced in VERO cells from African monkeys. It has residual formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, streptomycin, neomycin, polymyxin B and bovine serum, all used during the manufacturing process. For good measure, 1.5mg of aluminum phosphate is used as an adjuvant and polysorbate 80 and phenoxyethanol are present as excipients. It is approved for use in children 3yrs of age and over, adolescents and adults. Would you want this injected into your body, or the body of your child?

“So it’s TOXINS, TOXINS, TOXINS, and then your baby’s born, and the first thing they do is give your baby a hepatitis B vaccine with a huge dose, 250 mcg. of aluminum, TEN TIMES THE MAXIMUM TOXIC DOSE, according to the FDA. [The FDA] has had an active policy up since 2000 stating not to exceed 5 micrograms/Kg/day of parenteral aluminum

…

“I am a director on the board for PIC, Physicians for informed consent. One of the issues we hear over and over again, is that physician are scared to be public about their concerns with vaccines.

…

“…Here’s my concerns. You just need to know that physicians have no liability for giving vaccines. In fact, there’s movement going on, pressure from the pharmaceutical companies—oh, by the way, they don’t have any liability either. Why? This is a product with known inherent risks, and they’re completely free of liability. Why would they make a safer product or spend the research dollars to make better vaccines? They don’t have any liability, nor do the doctors, and the push across the country is for pharmacists to do vaccines. If we can’t get enough doctors to prescribe them, if we just put ads on TV that scare you to go get this or that vaccine, you can just go to the pharmacy and get it. …And they have no liability either.

A Growing Number Of Doctors And Scientists Are Speaking Out Against The CDC’s Deadly Vaccine Schedule

The following is a compilation of the medical doctors and scientists that have spoken out on the Vaxxed tour. This is what the mainstream media won’t show you and that should trouble everyone deeply. The silencing of these life-saving testimonials exemplifies the depths that Big Pharma will go to keep their profit machine churning.

“This book is a Bible for anyone who wants to understand the deep science behind the autism epidemic in America. Dr. Lyons-Weiler shows us convincingly that autism is not a mysterious disease with no known cause and no known treatment: it is the expected outcome when you expose a child with a certain genetic makeup to multiple neurotoxins simultaneously.”—Dr. Stephanie Seneff, senior research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

An Act to Protect the Pets from Over-Vaccination - To The Pet Lovers from Connecticut and around the World!

Soon I will announce the date of the public hearing to educate our legislators as to the horrific crime of over-vaccination; a crime that has left dead and injured pets and bereaved pet owners in its wake. A crime that violates Connecticut’s animal anti-cruelty laws which states that poisoning of pets is a crime subject to fine and imprisonment and yet daily in this not so great state of Connecticut pets are injected with toxins for no scientific reason but rather to force the pet owners to come to the vet and spend money, while your pet is poisoned!Some veterinarians have theorized that it is worth it because then the pet gets an annual exam and we vets can do preventative medicine! What??!! Force pet owners to come to the vet to get poisoned so the vet can keep them well. How crazy is that thinking??

You the pet owners, you the citizens have got to come to Hartford, Ct. You have got to come to the public hearing and speak for your pets. I will tell you why.

The CVMA will come – the Connecticut Veterinary Medical Association.

The AVMA will come – the American Veterinary Medical Association.

AAHA will come – the American Animal Hospital Association.

The Mars Candy Bar Company will come - which now owns over 3000 veterinary hospitals.

All four of these entities have sold out to the pharmaceutical companies who dump millions of dollars into their coffers for “continuing education”, free medications and free services. They are welcomed by the Deans of Veterinary Schools across this USA to give free bees to the veterinary students and pay for more “continuing education” to poison the veterinary student’s minds and indoctrinate them into their agenda. The pharmaceutical company’s agenda, the AVMA’s Agenda, the CVMA’s agenda and the Veterinary Schools agenda , and the Mars Candy Bar companies agenda - Profits over Pets!! They all compromise their moral values for money. And who suffers – you and your pets.

These organizations will be sending in “moles”. These “moles” are going to make false statements like, “you are vaccinating an immune system so the size of the animal does not matter!?” And these organizations will tell you pets are “family members”. If your pets were family member to them why are they killing them for profit? If they were really family members why do these organizations want to keep them seen as simple property by law? Why? -because they have NO liability when you the “pet” owner arrive at veterinary clinics to have your “animal” poisoned by over-vaccination daily. Let me ask one simple question, if vaccines should be administered one milliliter to every animal why does the rabies vaccine insert give these instructions?– Give 2 milliliters to a 1200 pound horse, one milliliter to a 150 pound great Dane and 1 milliliter to a 6 pound Yorkshire terrier and 1 milliliter to a 2 pound kitten??!! Something is wrong here, very wrong!!

I will soon announce the date for the public hearing. All pet owners must unite and come to this public hearing. You the pet owner must speak for your pet, the veterinary industry will not, they will speak for profit. They are going to tell you if you lower the volume of rabies vaccine by weight you will all be at risk to get rabies from your pet. They will try and make you paranoid, afraid. Do not let their fear tactics change your heart.

I, John M. Robb am a veterinarian for 34 years; I have administered tens of thousands of vaccines. I have been lowering my dose appropriately for all this time. I have never had one pet develop any disease I have vaccinated against but I have prevented many pets from getting sick and dying from over-vaccination. The truth is one rabies vaccine protects the pet for life!! If a simple blood titer is done and it is protective that pet does not need any further vaccination. A rabies certificate does not indicate immunity. We must give the lowest volume of vaccine, the lowest dose, and the lowest number of vaccines that stimulated the immune system to achieve a protective titer. Once this is established any further vaccine given only puts the pet at risk for a vaccine reaction while conferring no added protection. It’s criminal to do this and it stops now!!

Get ready to converge on Hartford, Connecticut for this historic public hearing. The lives of our pets depend on it! We must Protect the Pets!! Circulate this post to all pet lovers around the world. This is the hour of destiny. Destiny to Protect Our Beloved Pets!

Look on my website, www.protectthepets.com . Many vets joined the movement and signed up to protect the pets. At least they took a step to recognize the problems in our industry. Hopefully some have a like heart. More will join in time and then you the public will have a directory for "safe vets" . Doc

If you are of a certain age and were ever interested in politics you probably went through a stage where you read everything you possibly could about Senator Robert Kennedy. I know I did. I still do.

Robert Kennedy Sr.

The reason Robert Kennedy, Sr. continues to attract and inspire us is because he demonstrated a continuing capacity to learn. This was made clear to me in a recent book, Bobby Kennedy: The Making of a Liberal Icon by Larry Tye. Kennedy demonstrated that rare trait in a politician of being moved by the times and circumstances in which he lived.

Robert Kennedy Jr.

This same trait has been shown by his son, Robert Kennedy, Jr., in his crusade to clean up our waterways from mercury, and now with his greater mission of protecting children from massive corruption at the Centers for Disease Control regarding vaccines and autism.

Heroes still live among us.

Robert De Niro

You don’t have to be interested in politics to feel like you know Robert De Niro. You just have to be living on planet Earth. From the Godfather movies to Goodfellas, Awakenings, and his comedic turns in movies like Meet the Parents, De Niro is our consummate tough guy, and as the years have passed, he seems almost like a conscience for the world.

Supporting the two men in a ‘war room’ nearby were Del Bigtree, the producer of VAXXED: From Cover-up to Catastrophe, autism activist, Becky Estepp, Dr. Brian Hooker, Lynne Redwood, and many others. One participant, Jimmy said “Thank you, Bobby Kennedy. Thank you Bob De Niro, you are kicking some serious ass out there.”

These two amazing men have joined forces and at the National Press Club in Washington D.C.

Before their talk they fielded more than 20 interviews with local and national and local media.

In an interview prior to their talk at the National Press Club, De Niro explained how he came to be part of this project. He explained how the documentary VAXXED, caused such an uproar when it was accepted at the Tribeca Film Festival and that because of the controversy he made the decision to pull the film.

But that wasn’t the end of the story for Di Niro.

Trace Amounts – the movie can be ordered right here.

He came to know Robert Kennedy, Jr. and viewed other films, like Trace Amounts, and became convinced that more needed to be done. He said that more research needed to be done on vaccines, and noted that vaccines do not get the same type of safety testing as other pharmaceutical products.

Kennedy stepped in next, noting the great danger of mercury in vaccines, noting that 48 million flu shots filled with mercury are given to pregnant women each year, and that this is certainly behind the rise in conditions like autism, allergies, and autoimmune diseases.

Kennedy went on to say that he considered this to be journalistic malpractice, since journalists were not aggressively challenging the Centers for Disease Control and so he had a challenge. Kennedy was offering any journalist $100,000 if they could produce a single study showing that the injection of mercury into children was safe. He stated that his goal was to create an open public discussion on this issue.

Nico La Hood, the district attorney for Houston, Texas.

Another member of the group was Nico La Hood, the district attorney for Houston, Texas. In a statement released earlier he said, “Many challengers say to me, ‘correlation is not causation.’ In my world, correlation means investigation. But to them, correlation means ignorance. That makes no sense to me. What is everyone afraid of? Let’s follow the evidence wherever it leads.”

Host of the show, Full Measure, Sharyl Attkisson.

Kennedy, De Niro, and La Hood were joined at the National Press Club by television news reporter and host of the show, Full Measure, Sharyl Attkisson. She opened the press conference by showing a clip from former head of the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Bernadine Healy, saying that the question of vaccines and autism has not been asked and answered, and that researchers were scared of investigating the issue.

Now, to the meat of the issue…

After Attkisson, Kennedy kicked off discussion by telling how he came to this issue. He’d been suing power companies for the emission of mercury by coal-fired power plants and the effect they were having on fish populations. As he spoke across the country on this issue, he talked about how a group of mothers of vaccine-injured autism kept talking to him about mercury in the vaccines. He talked about 240 studies that show the damage mercury can cause and is neurotoxic to our children. These studies show that vaccines are linked to the cascade of neuro-developmental problems in our children.

He said the CDC shows that 43% of our children have some form of chronic disease. This epidemic started in 1989 according to CDC.

“If it’s not the thimerosal in vaccines, then what is it?” Kennedy said is the question journalists need to be asking. Kennedy said that while there are a number of potential chemicals which may also be involved, but thimerosal provides the best explanation.

He showed 81 studies that linked thimerosal to autism. He said there are no studies which say thimerosal is NOT linked to autism.

Kennedy said there are four different studies which say that the CDC is a cesspool of corruption.

The CDC owns or co-owns 56 different vaccine patents. The CDC has been telling reporters that the studies are out there, but no journalist has ever seen them. Journalists are not looking at what the studies actually say.

After asking for stories from the community, within a few hours they had more than 6,000 stories from parents that their child changed after a vaccination. Failure to look at these stories is akin to religious zealotry. It says that doctors know better what happened to their children than their parents.

Kennedy offered a $100,000 challenge to show that it is safe to inject pregnant women or infants with the levels of mercury that are currently in the flu vaccine.

Kennedy says that he has a panel of leading scientists who will judge whether the study is valid. He went onto say that democracy requires a system of checks and balances and it’s the job of journalists to challenge them.

Big Pharma is NOT our friend…

In the past few years the pharmaceutical industry has suffered more than 8 billion dollars in court costs for misuse of their products. He talked about how the pharmaceutical companies spend twice as much money lobbying Congress than the oil and gas industry. And we can’t count on lawyers, because the passage of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act prevents pharmaceutical companies from being sued for vaccine injuries. And now the pharmaceutical industry pays for the majority of advertising of the nightly news.

Feel free to call this group anything you want, The Avengers, Guardians of the Galaxy, X-Men, or even, The Justice League, but we have some first rate fighters on our side. Maybe we even have the new President of the United States on our side.

But these heroes can’t do it alone.

They aren’t Superman or Batman.

They are simply flesh and blood human beings who are making an immense sacrifice to do what they believe is right. And our enemy has BILLIONS of DOLLARS to spend against us, convincing the American people to remain asleep to the dangers of vaccines. But the great American people are beginning to wake up and see the wickedness and evil which has surrounded their children. And I believe they will fight.

Del Bigtree said in conclusion, “This is a victorious day. But it’s because of finding common ground, staying focused on that. This is ultimately all about our children, and then about our health because they’re going to be force-vaccinating adults as well. This is freedom hanging in the balance.”

I encourage EVERY ONE OF YOU to support their effort.

This our time to rise up. Leaders who don’t have an army won’t get very far. They have sounded the call to action.

Robert De Niro still can’t fully support vaccination.“Where is the science?” he asked in an interview on “Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson.”

“Who settled it, how is it settled?” he said in regards to the CDC’s claim.

“On one hand, the government is telling pregnant women which mercury-laced fish to avoid so that they don’t harm their fetuses, and on the other, the CDC supports injecting mercury-containing vaccines into pregnant women, infants and children,” Kennedy said.

A Letter From Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Robert De Niro to American Journalists

Financial conflicts with pharma are not unique to the CDC. Knowing that the pharmaceutical industry is by far the largest contributor of money to congressional lobbying, many Americans worry about the vigor of congressional oversight. They see how those political investments have purchased blanket immunity from lawsuits for vaccine makers. With lawyers and courts sidelined as a check and balance against bad behavior, and Congress and the regulatory agencies captured by the industry, many Americans wonder where the oversight of the vaccine program is coming from. They see the cascades of pharma money pouring into the American media—the final redoubt of critical scrutiny—and then wonder if journalistic vigilance has also been compromised.

Vaccinepapers.org provides detailed, science-based and objective information about the dangers of vaccines. We are most concerned about aluminum adjuvant toxicity and immune activation-mediated brain injury. Vaccinepapers.org is the first to make this hugely important scientific research accessible to the public.

This document is being made free to download to the world at large in order to encourage the lay public, health professionals, activists, and elected officials alike to read, acknowledge and share the voluminous literature with their family, friends, colleagues and related stakeholders. You will find this research undermines the national and global agenda to continue to expand the vaccine schedule (on behalf of a vaccine industry that is indemnified against lawsuit for defective or harmful products), with increasing legislative pressure to remove exemptions and mandate them against the evidence of harm and at best equivocal effectiveness as a preventive health measure.

If the vaccination arm of modern medicine today is to continue to promote itself as a science- and evidence-based practice, it must acknowledge and incorporate the implications of the research we are releasing here, or lose any pretense at credibility. Failing to do so will reveal that the widespread push to remove your choice in the matter is agenda and not evidence driven, and due to the fact that vaccines all carry the risk of irreversible harm and even death (any vaccine insert proves this), it clearly violates the Nuremberg code of medical ethics to promote them as a priori safe and effectiveness.

Marcella Piper-Terry: “Children vaccinated in the United States according to CDC's Recommended Schedule receive 8-10 vaccines at once during each of the "well-baby checks" at 2, 4, 6, and 12-15 months on age. America's children receive 25-26 vaccines by six months of age; 49 by kindergarten; and 70 by age 18. This has never been studied for either safety or efficacy. The entire schedule is experimental and our children are the study subjects.Hear Dr. Kroger from The CDC's vaccine education program as he admits the schedule has not been studied, and that there are no true placebo studies for vaccines. The United States Government has not only never done the studies, they refuse to provide funding so others can do them.

Did YOU know the United States Government is experimenting on YOUR children? You do now.

30 States Move to Enact Vaccine Bills Including Tracking and Mandatory Vaccines by National Vaccine Information Center

The following states are priority opposition alert state as they now have bills to restrict or eliminate vaccine exemptions: AR (withdrawn), CT, IA, MN, NY, OK, PA, and TX.

The following states are priority support alert states as they now have bills to add or expand vaccine exemptions: HI, IA, MS (died), NJ, NY, OK, RI, and TX.

If you are in any of the following states, beware that there are bills filed to expand vaccine tracking or eliminate OPT-IN Consent for vaccine tracking and that these need to be opposed: CT, ID, KS, MA, MT, NY, and TX.

With the thousands of mainstream media articles blaming the non-vaccinated for disease outbreaks, this article will provide a necessary counterbalance by showing the vaccinated can (and do) infect the non-vaccinated…

20 years ago, the MMR vaccine was found to infect virtually all of its recipients with measles. The manufacturer Merck's own product warning links MMR to a potentially fatal form of brain inflammation caused by measles. Why is this evidence not being reported?

4,250% Increase in Fetal Deaths Reported to VAERS After Flu Shot Given to Pregnant Women

The work of NCOW and Dr. Goldman has proven that potential lives are being destroyed before they are even old enough to draw their first breath. Developing fetuses who are fortunate enough to survive the onslaught of vaccinations now being recommended to pregnant women then need to play a form of Russian Roulette from the day they are born, because their caring parents followed the advice they were given by professionals who have been deliberately misguided.

Eileen Dannemann and her team have proven with their remarkable work that both public and professionals alike are being lied to and deceived by organizations put in place by the government to sanction our vaccination programs. In my opinion, this is genocide and the sooner people realize that all vaccines come with an element of risk and begin to research the dangers for themselves, the sooner these insane experiments will end.

Certainly these discoveries by SCPI should generate an immediate investigation by FDA officials, ifnot an outright ban on the use of aborted fetal cell lines as substrates for vaccine production. Thereare numerous other non-human FDA-approved cell lines that can and should be used.

If over-vaccination can be harmful or fatal to your pets, what is it doing to your kids? Investigation: Vaccinating pets for profit?

"Repetitive vaccination over the years can definitely trigger an autoimmune reactions, which can be harmful if not fatal to your pet," said Porcher. Dr. Porcher added, make sure your vet's primary concern is your pet's health and not their profit margin. "A lot of people do what they’re told," Dr. Porcher said. "I think a lot of people have not stood back and questioned why are we doing this."

This website is PACKED with stories from parents who have vaccine free and vaccine damaged children, great overviews of why vaccines are dangerous and how we can go 100% vaccine free without fear, historical information as to why vaccines did NOT eliminate disease from society, book and documentary resources, and everything a parent needs to confidently go vaccine free. Share it today!!!

Seneff: “Another post by JB Handley: one of the best articles I've seen on vaccines and autism.”

Three months ago, the prospects that the first study ever done comparing the health outcomes (both chronic and acute) of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children would be published were looking very, very good. A study from Jackson State University had been accepted by a prestigious journal, Frontiers in Public Health, had passed peer-review, and was days away from being published. As is customary, Frontiers posted an abstract of the study online alerting readers that the study was on its way, and that’s when all hell broke loose.

Among the specific findings of the study were that vaccinated children were 80 percent more likely to be diagnosed as having anorexia and 25 percent more likely to be diagnosed with OCD than unvaccinated children. Children who had been vaccinated were also more likely to be diagnosed as having an anxiety disorder than unvaccinated children.2

According to professor of pediatrics at the Yale School of Medicine James F. Leckman, MD, who was a co-author of the study, “There’s a fair amount of interest in the vaccine safety question, so let’s try to be critical and do further studies that will help examine this issue in a more thorough way.”3

Today in the US and a growing number of other countries, the official policy is that any scientific study, regardless of its methodology, quality, author credentials, and peer-reviewed process is summarily dismissed as incomplete, irrelevant or unsupported if it finds a connection between any vaccine or combination of vaccines and autism spectrum disorder. Even when the CDC’s own immunologist, Dr. William Thompson, whistle-blows and provides thousands of pages of scientific data and research proving a vaccine-autism connection, the matter is rapidly shoved under the table. In the case of Dr. Thompson’s release of confidential documents to a Congressional subcommittee, the CDC intentionally concealed their evidence that African American boys under 36 months had a higher risk of autism after receiving the MMR vaccine. The documents also proved the CDC has know for a long time that neurological tics, indicating brain disturbances, were associated with thimerosal-containing vaccines, such as the influenza vaccine.

We have also known for over fifteen years, thanks to a Freedom of Information Act filing, that CDC officials, vaccine scientists on the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel, the WHO and private pharmaceutical executives met secretly for two days at the Simpsonwood retreat center near Atlanta to deliberate on the Verstraeten research’s findings proving thimerosal’s role in the rise of autism. The meeting was held for the specific purpose to find ways to prevent the findings from reaching the public, and spin and manipulate the data to disprove a vaccine-autism connection.

In plain language, veterinary schools in America, plus the American Veterinary Medical Association, have looked at studies to show how long vaccines last and they have concluded and announced that annual vaccination is unnecessary.(16-19)

Further, they have acknowledged that vaccines are not without harm. Dr Ron Schultz, head of pathobiology at Wisconsin University and a leading light in this field, has been saying this politely to his veterinary colleagues since the 1980s. I’ve been saying it for the past 12 years. But change is so long in coming and, in the meantime, hundreds of thousands of animals are dying every year – unnecessarily.

The good news is that thousands of animal lovers (but not enough) have heard what we’ve been saying. Canine Health Concern members around the world use real food as Nature’s supreme disease preventative, eschewing processed pet food, and minimise the vaccine risk. Some of us, myself included, have chosen not to vaccinate our pets at all. Our reward is healthy and long-lived dogs.

A top scientist at the CDC recently admitted that he and his co-authors omitted crucial information from a study that was published 10 years ago. The excluded information showed that "African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism."(1,2) Less than 20 years before their study was published, the CDC tested deadly, experimental measles vaccines on African infants and then again on inner-city American babies. These examples provide strong evidence that the CDC is engaged in a pattern of cavalier, unethical and potentially criminal behavior whereby the human rights of Black families and minority children are being violated. You should trust the CDC and their measles vaccines, including MMR, at your own peril.

Seneff: “If I am interpreting this article by Catherine Frompovich correctly, it means that the vaccines have much higher levels of aluminum in them than what is stated on the package insert. If this is true, it is very alarming, because I (and many others) have identified aluminum as one of the key toxic ingredients in vaccines.”

High Concentrations Of Aluminum In European Vaccines

Each vaccine is loaded with aluminum, which damages the brain and CNS, and every vaccine has ethylmercury (Thimerosal), another neurotoxin! What’s with the story that mercury was taken out of all vaccines? Liar, liar, pants on fire? Is there any wonder children are neurologically compromised?

Gone in 24 hours! That's what happens if you post anything remotely sane about vaccines on Huffington Post.Huffington Post took down ANOTHER article yesterday from ANOTHER one of their writers discussing vaccine safety.

Seneff: “This was posted in June, 2014, but if you want to learn the true story about the checkered history of the measles vaccine, your best bet would be to read this article by the co-author of Dissolving Illusions (Roman Bystrianyk).”

But, there are facts regarding the history of measles that almost never reach the light of day. Here are 14 things you may not have been told by public health officials, your doctor, or the media.

1. Measles death rate had declined by almost 100% before the use of a measles vaccine

During the 1800s, measles was a notable cause of death. Epidemics occurred every few years causing a large influx of children into local hospital wards. In Glasgow, England From 1807-1812 measles accounted for 11% of all deaths. In the years from 1867-1872, 49% of children in a Paris orphanage who developed measles died. [2] Starting in the mid to late-1800s deaths from all infectious diseases, including measles, began to decline. By the 1930s in England and the United States the chance of dying from measles had dropped to 1-2 percent.

A killed measles virus (KMV) vaccine came into use in the United States in 1963. What you may not have heard, is that by 1963, the death rate from measles in the United States had already dropped by approximately 98%. [3]

Seneff: “Finally, the vaxxed/unvaxxed study we've all been waiting for! Stunning results! But of course the article was censored. Parents need to become informed and then make wise decisions for their kids. Thank you, Pres. Trump for making vaccine safety a priority of your agenda. Let's see action!”

Censored Study of Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated sees Daylight

In learning about the content of the study, Dr. Fogarty said, “As an academic and clinical imager who’s specialty is grounded in the ethics of transparency, it is terribly disturbing that this manuscript is getting censored. It begs the question as to why.” He paused, his voice growing irate, and added, “Nowhere else in academia do we see the degree of censorship of inquiry than in this arena. In fact, the economic, professional and political risks of anyone driving safety science in this sphere of U.S public health is so great that it has served to muzzle virtually an entire professional class. Concerned physicians who are surgeons, radiologists, pathologists, primary care physicians, and even pediatricians face whispered threats of loss of licensure for even speaking out from within the profession.”

For Anthony Mawson, who has submitted the study to another scientific journal, it is a waiting game. The key difference between his population-based study and that of the CDC, which hired a Danish mercenary scientist to cook data on fraudulent studies, is that Mawson didn’t change the study’s design parameters midstream, or found out what happens if he cut out a swath of data because he didn’t like the results.

Sure, Mawson and his study will be attacked by the paid Big Pharma shills and the mainstream media, saying they “can’t verify the results,” because the study design was an anonymous survey of mothers in four states with the unvaccinated children being home-schooled. But that red herring is baseless, since the CDC used the same survey method in 2015 that produced a stunning 1 in 45 incidence rate of autism in newborn children.

Dr. Summers, let me say first of all, your argument that studies show no link is what Kennedy’s offer was all about.

You are relying on research with vast ties to the vaccine makers.

Toxicity studies have never been done on either the mercury additive thimerosal or the aluminum used in vaccines. (And yes, thimerosal is still in large amounts in the flu vaccine given to pregnant women and babies as young as six months. In addition, while American children have reduced levels of mercury in their other vaccines, no such protection is afforded children in poor countries where vaccines are laced with full doses of thimerosal.)

The Danish research that you cited as independent comes from Dr. Poul Thorsen, the principal researcher who is under indictment for 22 counts of wire fraud and money laundering by the U.S. government, having stolen over $1 million in research funding paid for by the U.S taxpayers. How reliable do you think his work is?

What Kennedy is offering is $100,000 for anyone who can produce the reputable science showing that injecting mercury into humans is safe. (And the 19 easily flawed and manipulated population studies that officials use just don’t make it. They are proof of nothing.) Where are the toxicity studies? Where are the animal studies?

Robert Kennedy, Jr put this comment on Dr. Summer's article in the Washington Post:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/the-evidence-for-vaccine…/…

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., 3:06 PM CST

Dr. Daniel Summers asserts that several epidemiological studies cited on CDC website prove that thimerosal is a safe vaccine preservative. The notorious flaws in these studies aside, none of them pretend to be safety studies: they simply purport to exonerate thimerosal as a causative agent of a single disease, autism. Most of them acknowledge that thimerosal causes other brain injuries including low IQ and Tics. A rich literature of hundreds of independent studies available on Pub Med link thimerosal to autism and many other neurodevelopmental disorders.

Contrary to Summers's assertion, thimerosal remains in massive doses in US flu vaccines administered to pregnant women during every trimester. Data from a Kaiser Permanente study, published in January, links first trimester flu shots to a significant rise in autism diagnosis.

Summers claims the Kennedy/DeNiro $100K reward offering a Danish study which he says was created independent of CDC’s corrupting influence. However, CDC commissioned, funded and directed those studies and hired its sketchy data manager, Poul Thorsen. Thorsen’s studies have been widely discredited for using deceptive devices to conceal the statistical association between autism and thimerosal. Thorsen is now under indictment for 22 counts of fraud and theft and on the run in Europe. HHS lists Thorsen as a fugitive on its Most Wanted list.

A subsequent 2013 study by CDC scientists revealed a 33% drop in autism after Denmark banned thimerosal in 1993 suggesting a link.

Dr. Summers offers to meet and debate me on the science relevant to thimerosal safety. I accept.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Chairman, worldmercuryproject.org

Vaccines: What is there to be "Pro" About? Laura Hayes to Weston A. Price Foundation Conference

Here are a few questions I’d like to begin with in an effort to dispel the myths that vaccines are safe, effective, properly licensed, and properly monitored post-marketing:

How can vaccines be both safe, as touted by doctors, government regulators, and the media, and unavoidably unsafe, meaning inherently dangerous, as declared by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011? Both statements cannot be true.

HPV Vaccine: American College of Pediatricians Issues Rare Warning Against Vaccine Due to Premature Ovarian Failure

“It has recently come to the attention of the College that one of the recommended vaccines could possibly be associated with the very rare but serious condition of premature ovarian failure (POF), also known as premature menopause.”

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

That the general statutes be amended to allow veterinarians to (1) vary from vaccine dosage protocols when in the best interest and health of an animal, and (2) administer a rabies antibody titer to determine the need for a rabies booster vaccine.

Statement of Purpose:

To allow veterinarians to make decisions that are in the best interest of an animal's health and to prevent animals from being over-vaccinated.

Animal studies in the 1990s by researcher Phyllis Mullenix, at the Harvard-affiliated Forsyth Research Institute, showed that rats exposed to fluoride in the womb were much more likely to behave in a hyperactive manner later in life. This could be due to direct damage or alteration to the development of the brain. (Mullenix’s adviser told her she was “jeopardizing the financial support” of her institution by “going against what dentists and everybody have been publishing for fifty years, that [fluoride] is safe and effective,” and she was fired shortly after one of her seminal papers was accepted for publication, according to Grandjean and a book by investigative journalist Christopher Bryson called The Fluoride Deception.)

New York State Senator Brad Hoylman and Assemblymember Jeffrey Dinowitz have reintroduced their bills to repeal the religious exemption from vaccine mandates to attend school. Assembly Bill A1810 and Senate Bill S52 are nothing more than a vehicle to discriminate against religious minorities whose beliefs Dinowitz and Hoylman do not share, and does nothing to improve public health. But it does significantly increase the control the vaccine industry has over healthcare decisions that should be made by individuals for themselves, and parents for minor children.

Please click on the Take Action Link to send a message to your State Senator and Assemblymember stating your opposition to this bill.

“I’m sorry...this is an agenda from the devil himself...I am really sorry. Vietnam doesn’t have...there’s no such thing as autism in 1975...when Vietnam signed into the International Monetary Fund, the banking system, Bill Gates of the Gates Foundation introduced the vaccination program into Vietnam. Vietnam now has over 300 percent rise in autism...he’s ruined Africa...Vietnam has an unimaginable rate of autism now.”

If you had a newborn baby today, would you give that baby a vaccine? “Absolutely not.”

Dr. Toni Bark, M.D. – Do Not Remove Vaccine Exemptions – Some Children Die from Vaccines

I began to see patterns. Children who were seen in the vaccine clinic would then come to our ER with seizures, respiratory arrest and asthma attacks. I began to realize, not all children respond well to vaccination and in fact, some die.

It wasn’t until my masters program in disaster management at BU, which I began in 2010 and finished in 2012, did I begin to see the fraudulent nature of how vaccines are being marketed and the corruption in the advisory committees.

I had not even been made aware of the federal vaccine court. I had no idea vaccine recipients who were damaged or killed from vaccines had zero recourse with the manufacturer or physician.

I have to thank Del Bigtree for taking the time to show me the data that I was inadvertently pretending not to see, and I really have to thank Dr. Thompson. Without this information, we would never have known, and it all would’ve just been written off as mishmash of conspiracy theories.

With what I now know, I cannot support mandatory vaccines for children. Some kids respond well to vaccines, but others do not. How can we be sure who will and who will not? Should we really sacrifice one for many? Parents have to have the right to choose! Parents have to make their own informed decisions. Parents deserve access to this information which has been buried so deep that even I, a practicing physician, hadn’t been aware of.

I apologize from the bottom of my heart to any children and parents that I have unknowingly harmed. I had no idea.

Please ask questions and make the time to go see the documentary Vaxxed. Form your own opinions, do your own research, and then talk to your physician. Demand to hear from Dr. Thompson, pass this information along to your loved ones, and start these conversations. We all deserve answers, and this is the only way to get any.

People keep asking me if I’m scared to speak about this. My realest fear is that we will continue to assume that these moms are making this stuff up.

Conclusions: The pattern of metabolites in the urine samples of the males with autism are consistent with a recent theory of autism that connects widespread glyphosate use with alteration of animal and human gastrointestinal flora. That theory is that the normally beneficial bacteria species that are sensitive to glyphosate are diminished and harmful bacteria species, such as Clostridia, that are insensitive to glyphosate, are increased following exposure toglyphosate. Excessive dopamine, caused by inhibition of dopamine-beta-hydroxylase by Clostridia metabolites, in turn, produces oxidative species that damage neuronal Krebs cycle enzymes, neuronal mitochondria, and neuronal structural elements such as the neurofibrils.

Adverse events diagnosed within three days of vaccine administration in dogs.

RESULTS: 4,678 adverse events (38.2/10,000 dogs vaccinated) were associated with administration of 3,439,576 doses of vaccine to 1,226,159 dogs. The VAAE rate decreased significantly as body weight increased. Risk was 27% to 38% greater for neutered versus sexually intact dogs and 35% to 64% greater for dogs approximately 1 to 3 years old versus 2 to 9 months old. The risk of a VAAE significantly increased as the number of vaccine doses administered per office visit increased; each additional vaccine significantly increased risk of an adverse event by 27% in dogs < or = 10 kg (22 lb) and 12% in dogs > 10 kg.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Young adult small-breed neutered dogs that received multiple vaccines per office visit were at greatest risk of a VAAE within 72 hours after vaccination. These factors should be considered in risk assessment and risk communication with clients regarding vaccination.

“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”

“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”

“The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”

The autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA), presented by Shoenfeld and Agmon-Levin in 2011, is an entity that incorporates diverse autoimmune conditions induced by the exposure to various adjuvants. Adjuvants are agents that entail the capability to induce immune reactions. Adjuvants are found in many vaccines and used mainly to increase the response to vaccination in the general population. Silicone has also been reported to be able to induce diverse immune reactions. Clinical cases and series of heterogeneous autoimmune conditions including systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis have been reported to be induced by several adjuvants. However, only a small number of cases of autoimmune thyroid disorder have been included under the umbrella of ASIA syndrome. Indeed, clinical cases of Hashimoto's thyroiditis and/or subacute thyroiditis were observed after the exposure to vaccines as well as silicone implantation. In our review, we aimed to summarize the current knowledge on ASIA syndrome presented as endocrinopathies, focusing on autoimmune thyroid disorders associated with the various adjuvants.

Evolution of multiple sclerosis in France since the beginning of hepatitis B vaccination

Almost 20 years later, a retrospective reflection can be sketched from these official data and also from the national pharmacovigilance agency. Statistical data from these latter sources seem to show a significant correlation between the number of hepatitis B vaccinations performed and the declaration to the pharmacovigilance of multiple sclerosis occurring between 1 and 2 years later. The application of the Hill’s criteria to these data indicates that the correlation between hepatitis B vaccine and multiple sclerosis may be causal.

Rise in mumps outbreaks prompts U.S. officials to weigh third vaccine dose

“Although the disease has not been serious, the disruption and expense it has caused for local and state health officials has been significant,” said Kelly Moore, who directs the immunization program at the Tennessee Department of Health and is head of ACIP's work group on mumps.

The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis and Oral Polio Vaccine Among Young Infants in an Urban African Community: A Natural Experiment

DTP was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP. Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP3 is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs.

It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.

Due to dwindling capacity for existing aborted fetal cell lines to self-replicate, scientists in China have developed a new aborted fetal cell line, WALVAX 2 that will be used for viral vaccine production. The existing cell lines, MRC-5 and WI-38 are currently used in MMR, Varicella, Hepatitis-A, Shingles, some rabies and some polio vaccines.

WALVAX 2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted babies. The scientists noted how they followed specific guidelines to mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation. They further noted how they induced labor using a “water bag” abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.

Aluminum-based adjuvants (aluminum salts or alum) are widely used in human vaccination, although their mechanisms of action are poorly understood. Here we report that, in mice, alum causes cell death and the subsequent release of host cell DNA, which acts as a potent endogenous immunostimulatory signal mediating alum adjuvant activity. Furthermore, we propose that host DNA signaling differentially regulates IgE and IgG1 production after alum-adjuvanted immunization. We suggest that, on the one hand, host DNA induces primary B cell responses, including IgG1 production, through interferon response factor 3 (Irf3)-independent mechanisms. On the other hand, we suggest that host DNA also stimulates 'canonical' T helper type 2 (T(H)2) responses, associated with IgE isotype switching and peripheral effector responses, through Irf3-dependent mechanisms. The finding that host DNA released from dying cells acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern that mediates alum adjuvant activity may increase our understanding of the mechanisms of action of current vaccines and help in the design of new adjuvants.

For decades both the pharmaceutical companies and even some ethicists have insisted that the abortions to produce the cell lines used in vaccines were not done with that intention, that it was only a couple of abortions from the past and that no further abortions would be needed “now or in the future” to produce vaccines.

“This may be the biggest lie ever told to the American public and the world at large,” said Mrs. Vinnedge. “Not only have there been hundreds of abortions directly involved with vaccine research – specifically for that purpose where they altered abortion methods to obtain intact fetal organs , but we are now seeing more and more abortions for fetal research and new cell lines emerging for viral vaccine cultivation.”

While Children of God for Life has been trying to expose these truths for the past 15 years , those warnings are now ringing startling accurate as evidenced with the recent Planned Parenthood videos that have emerged through the Center for Medical Progress, (CMP) showing how live, fully intact fetuses have been harvested for aborted fetal research.

Anyone daring to suggest that a vaccine might present a risk, especially to children as the most vulnerable members of our society, are usually shot down in flames. Health authorities have tried their best to continue telling everyone that HPV vaccines (note use of plural as there are three different types available) are safe, despite ongoing research suggesting otherwise.

A study just released by a World Health Organization (WHO) monitoring centre in Sweden shows that adverse event reports received from national authorities — and these will represent only a fraction of those actually experienced — show a tendency to produce clusters of serious adverse events that include complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) that exceeds any other vaccine.

According to the Tenth Amendment Center, HB 331 and HB 332 have yet to be referred to committee and must pass through their committee assignments by a majority vote prior to consideration by the full House.

In 2011, Rost blew the whistle on Big Pharma and its crooked ties with the medical fraternity in a documentary titled “One More Girl.” In the 2-minute clip below, he reveals how Big Pharma makes enormous profits and how Big Pharma manipulates scientific research. He also revealed how Big Pharma is ruining the field of medical clinical research; how medical evidence is nothing more than marketing literature put together by, and funded by Big Pharma; and how Big Pharma and government regulators allow this fraud to happen every day, with the sole intention to con humanity.

the CDC lists all the excipients currently used in vaccines being injected into adults and children across the United States. The CDC’s list, current as of January 6, 2017, was “extracted from manufacturers’ package inserts,” according to the CDC.

Humphries: “Another discovery that highlights the ignorance of biologists, immunologists, neurologists, all of whom will categorically deny that vaccines have anything to do with brain injury. They don't know much about the brain, but they all seem to know one thing: "It's not the vaccine."

Add that to this classic that came out in 2015 where they admitted that all medical textbooks will have to be re-written because they discovered BRAIN LYMPHATIC DRAIN. Wow. Ignorance is certainly not bliss for the poor patients who rely on the system of medicine that is propped up by vaccination religion written on the back of ignorance.”

This is the data the drug industry do not want you to see. Here 2 centuries of UK, USA and Australian official death statistics show conclusively and scientifically modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improved life expectancy and survival from disease in western economies. A detailed Contents listing of this article with each category of disease and related graphs appears after the Introduction.

The ability to induce lupus autoantibodies is shared by several hydrocarbons and is not unique to pristane. It correlates with stimulation of the production of IL-12 and other cytokines, suggesting a relationship with a hydrocarbon's adjuvanticity. The potential to induce autoimmunity may complicate the use of oil adjuvants in human and veterinary vaccines.

Out of all these mainstream media websites, not a single one mentioned the Press Conference or Vaccine Safety anywhere on their main page or Health pages. If you are hoping to get honest reporting from the mainstream media about vaccine safety, I think the fact that not a single one of them could cover this decidedly “pro-vaccine” event should make you realize- they are not going to talk about it. It is suicide for them. Up to 80% of their ad revenue comes from Pharmaceutical advertising and they can not talk about this issue. It is up to us, independent researchers, journalists, bloggers, moms and dads to make these issues known. We will not get help from the media. And that is my incredible opinion.

Huffington Post took down ANOTHER article yesterday from ANOTHER one of their writers discussing vaccine safety. How many women will they try to silence before the noise becomes too much to ignore? Show these authors your support wherever you can!

Scientists appear to be far closer to explaining the mechanisms of action within the body that cause autism. Most of the research that has created this understanding has been published in the last 36 months, and largely from international scientists in Canada, France, Israel, and China. Four clear, replicable, and related discoveries explaining how autism is triggered are forming an undeniably clear picture of autism’s causation, and possibly ways to alleviate the symptoms, too.

Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.11.12

Furthermore, vaccine recipients can carry diseases in the back of their throat and infect others while displaying no symptoms of a disease.13,14,15

Autism, mercury, thimerosal and vaccines: Natural News releases large collection of scientific knowledge that’s been suppressed by the FDA, CDC and pharma-controlled media

That is exactly why the mercury poisoning of our children must be stopped. Mercury must be removed from all vaccines, and those children provably harmed by mercury from immunizations must be allowed their day in court. (A real court, not the vaccine injury kangaroo court that’s essentially run by the pharmaceutical industry.)

Read this astonishing collection of evidence yourself, and learn what the vaccine industry — and its fake news media collaborators — desperately hopes you never discover.

Attacking Ourselves: Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us

"On the other hand, many reports that describe post-vaccination autoimmunity strongly suggest that vaccines can indeed trigger autoimmunity. Defined autoimmune diseases that may occur following vaccinations include arthritis, lupus (systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE) diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, dermatomyosiositis, Guillain-Barre syndrome and demyelinating disorders. Almost all types of vaccines have been reported to be associated with the onset of ASIA."

ASIA – or Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (also known as Shoenfeld's syndrome) -- first appeared in the Journal of Autoimmunology four years ago. It is an umbrella term for a collection of similar symptoms, including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, that result after exposure to an adjuvant – an environmental agent including common vaccine ingredients that stimulate the immune system. Since then an enormous body of research, using ASIA as a paradigm, has begun to unravel the mystery of how environmental toxins, particularly the metal aluminum used in vaccines, can trigger an immune system chain reaction in susceptible individuals and may lead to overt autoimmune disease.

Autoimmune disease results when the body's system meant to attack foreign invaders turns instead to attack part of the body it belongs to (auto is Greek for self). If the immune system is like a national defence system, antibodies are like drones programmed to recognize a certain type of invader (a bacteria say) and to destroy them or mark them for destruction by other special forces. Autoantibodies are like drones that are misidentifying a component of the human body and have launched a sustained attack on it. If they mistakenly target a component of the conductive sheath around neurons, for example, nerve impulses stop conducting properly, muscles go into spasm and coordination fails; multiple sclerosis results. If autoantibodies erroneously focus on joint tissue; rheumatoid arthritis results. If they target the islets of Langerhans in the pancreas, Type 1 diabetes, and so on.

New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro and Nano contamination

Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components andwhose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.

Doctor Patricia Ryan visits the VaxXed bus while in Omaha, Nebraska and shares what she knows about the dangers of vaccines.

At 6:55 “...and you know when they combine the vaccines with Roundup and see we’re in a corn state, we’re in the corn belt, and Nebraska is number one per capita for Parkinson’s Disease, number one in the world per capita for Parkinson’s. When you combine the vaccines with the pesticides and herbicides that are in our food, it’s a double whammy. So we really need to wake up and start doing something and speaking up, and mandating vaccines is very, very dangerous, very dangerous president, and we have the right to say no and we need to say no.”

"The National Adult Vaccination Program (NAVP), is a multi-stakeholder industry-supported collaboration to develop a cohesive strategic and policy approach to improve adult vaccination aligned with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

Stakeholder: a person or group that has an investment, share, or interest in something, as a business or industry.

L. A.: “I'd like to share something with you. I work in a Neurology office... I decided to start reading the medical magazines and articles we place in the doctors mailbox. Get an idea of what the "medical community" reads and discusses ..... pretty interesting (and nauseating) if I do say so myself. I've only started doing this, this week. And I'm only a couple pages into the first.... brought to you by "Family Practice News" Vol. 47.”

The United States has the highest Infant Mortality Rate in the First 24 hours, of all developed nations. American babies die in their first 24 hours of life (post-delivery) at a rate that is higher than any other first world country on the planet.

This list is from a 2015 VAERS search. This is page one of 21 pages of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, documenting a small percentage of vaccine-induced deaths occurring within 24 hours of vaccination. Look how many of them are ruled "SIDS." And know this... According to the AMA, less than 10% of vaccine injuries and deaths is reported.

Seneff: “Five minute video on the manipulation of the market by Pharma for drugs and vaccines. Outstanding and disturbing.”

Laurie Powell, a former pharmaceutical marketing executive, explains how drug companies manipulate doctors, scientific journals and advertising to create demand for drugs. This is an excerpt from our upcoming documentary film on the HPV vaccine. Feb 28, 2017

Sulfate, Sleep and Sunlight: The Disruptive and Destructive Effects of Heavy Metals and Glyphosate

She discussed "a role for the pineal gland in neurological damage following aluminum-adjuvented vaccination." Along the way, she made many fascinating connections between various strands of her recent work, briefly summarized in this article.

…

Glyphosate: The Elephant in the Room

Dr. Seneff infers from these findings that glyphosate is making vaccines far more toxic than they would otherwise be.

Today, Judge Kapetan formalized her ruling against Monsanto, which will allow California to proceed with the process of listing glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, as a chemical “known to the state to cause cancer” in accordance with the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, better known as Proposition 65.

Filmmaker Natalie Beer sets off on a journey around the world speaking to leading doctors, scientists and families to find out the truth about the autism epidemic and whether or not vaccines have a role to play. The film explores the common misconception that autism is solely genetic and looks into scientists concerns over recent years about environmental factors such as medication and pesticides which continue to leave our children with physical and neurological damage.

THE DOCTOR WHO BEAT THE BRITISH GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL BY PROVING THAT VACCINES AREN’T NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE HEALTH

So some things just didn’t seem to quite add up. However, it is very hard to start seriously questioning whether or not vaccination is anything other than safe and effective, especially when it is something that you have been taught to believe in so strongly. The more medically qualified you are, the more difficult it is, as in some ways the more brainwashed you are. It’s not easy, or at least it wasn’t then, to start going down a path that might lead you in the opposite direction to all your colleagues and the healthcare system in which you work.

…

I also realized that the reason the Department of Health’s graphs made the vaccine appear so effective was because they didn’t start until the 1940s when most of the improvements in health had already occurred, and this was before even antibiotics were generally available. If you selected only deaths in under-15-year-olds, the drop was even more dramatic – by the time whooping cough vaccine was part of the universal immunization schedule in the early 1960s all the hard work had been done.

A Hidden Vaccine Side Effect That Many Pet Owners (and Vets) Never Suspect by Dr. Karen Becker

And tragically, once the diagnosis is finally made, traditional veterinary medicine has little to offer because from their perspective, “there is no known cause.” Whereas holistic veterinarians have linked vaccines to autoimmune disorders for decades, the conventional veterinary community just can’t seem to get there.

Banned Wakefield Films From British TV Emerge on Youtube After Nearly a Decade

Three controversial television films suppressed as part of the continued persecution of Andrew Wakefield are now available to watch on YouTube. The drama ‘Hear the Silence’ starring Hugh Bonneville as Andrew Wakefield and Juliet Stevenson as a mother trying to find the truth about what happened to her child was seen once on British television in December 2003 and then disappeared. Two months later the allegations of Brian Deer began to appear in the media. It has now been posted on the web by ‘ScienceIsrael’ in the original English with Hebrew subtitles.

Experts from panels of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products have investigated whether there might be a link between hexavalent vaccines and some cases of deaths that occurred. Participants included pathologists with experience in the field of vaccines and sudden infant death syndrome who conducted autopsies. However, to the best of our knowledge, little, if any, attention was paid to examination of the brainstem and the cardiac conduction systems on serial sections, nor was the possibility of a triggering role of the vaccine in these deaths considered. Herein we report the case of a 3-month-old female infant dying suddenly and unexpectedly shortly after being given a hexavalent vaccination. Examination of the brainstem on serial sections revealed bilateral hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus. The cardiac conduction system presented persistent fetal dispersion and resorptive degeneration. This case offers a unique insight into the possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby. Any case of sudden unexpected death occurring perinatally and in infancy, especially soon after a vaccination, should always undergo a full necropsy study according to our guidelines.

If you are a parent of a baby or young children, expecting a baby or if you are a health professional you need to watch this lecture filmed at a Radio Liberty Seminar in October 2008 in which Russell Blaylock MD discusses the effect of vaccines on the developing brain and his concerns about the increasingly crowded infant vaccination schedule.

Dr Blaylock also provides compelling arguments why the vaccination of pregnant women is harmful and a hidden cause of neurological disorders. He also discusses the toxic ingredients in vaccines such as formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum and MSG and the detrimental effects they have on the brain and nervous system. He also touches on other vaccine-related topics, such as the conflicts of interests influencing vaccination policy due to the influence the pharmaceutical industry exerts on the government and the pharmaceutical industry, the polio epidemics in Africa, mercury toxicity and other medical scandals.

Combining Childhood Vaccines at One Visit Is Not Safe - Neil Z. Miller

Conclusion: The safety of CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule was never affirmed in clinical studies. Vaccines are administered to millions of infants every year, yet health authorities have no scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants are likely to receive. National vaccination campaigns must be supported by scientific evidence. No child should be subjected to a health policy that is not based on sound scientific principles and, in fact, has been shown to be potentially dangerous.

Cadmium, arsenic, lead, and mercury have been linked to autism, attention deficit disorder, mental retardation and death of children. Mercury in thimerosal found in many vaccines and flu shots contributes significantly to these problems. Decomposition of the thimerosal can produce more toxic compounds, either methylethylmercury or diethylmercury, in the body. These compounds have a toxicity level similar to dimethylmercury. Within the human body, a mitochondrial disorder may release the more toxic form of mercury internally. Young children and pregnant women must minimize internal exposure to the vaccines and flu shots containing mercury.

Veterinarian Speaks Out, Presents Decades of Research Linking Pet Deaths to Over-Vaccinations is Met with Laughter

“The vaccine in question is the rabies shot. Dr. Robb says that the shot works for a pet’s entire lifetime (and a blood test can determine if it is still in effect). However, largely because of the immense influence and power of the vaccine manufacturers, the rabies shot is being recommended annually. He says this shot has made pets instantly vomit and fall ill, develop immune disorders, cancers, and can even cause death.

Not only is the number of vaccines not regulated, the dose is also not adjusted for the body weight, making the shot potentially dangerous and even lethal for smaller-sized animals.”

This astroturfing effort is further supported by an organized troop of trolls who overwhelm social media with vitriol that dismisses arguments, denies science, denigrates opponents, distracts the public, and disrupts conversation about the real health risks of fluoridation policy to consumers.

House Republicans are advancing a series of bills that would make changes to the civil justice system long sought by doctors and U.S. corporations, including a cap on some medical malpractice awards and new roadblocks for classes of people seeking to sue jointly to address harm.

If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.

The group, which claimed to represent scientists across the CDC's diverse branches, calls itself SPIDER (Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research). The letter to CDC Chief of Staff, Carmen Villar, expressed alarm "about the current state of ethics at our agency." The scientists complained that "our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests" and "circumvented by some of our leaders."

The scientists told Villar that, "questionable and unethical practices, occurring at all levels and in all of our respective units, threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health." The letter charged that staff level scientists "are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right," and that, "Senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors."

Stronger More Toxic Gardasil Vaccine Approved by FDA: Will More Girls Suffer and Die?

Take a look at the first line in the chart to the left. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin. A quick search of PubMed for ’aluminum toxicity human’returns no less than 1652 peer-reviewed and published scientific papers on the subject. Why did Merck more than double the amount of aluminum adjuvant in Gardasil 9?

With the exception of CBS, every major media outlet in the United States shares at least one board member with at least one pharmaceutical company.

With the exception of CBS, every major media outlet in the United States shares at least one board member with at least one pharmaceutical company. To put that into perspective: These board members wake up, go to a meeting at Merck or Pfizer, then they have their driver take them over to a meeting with NBC to decide what kind of programming that network is going to air. America’s Lawyer Mike Papantonio discusses the connection between Big Pharma and Mainstream Media outlets.

As in the US, Monsanto has cleverly inserted chemical company executives into government positions to influence policy.

He added that the government has admitted that “developmental delays and autism rates are out of control.”

...

Regardless of the source of the toxic exposure to children which contributes to developmental delays, whether it be imported food from the USA or local produce sprayed with chemicals, the originating source of their method of farming comes from American chemical companies who convinced farmers around the world to declare war on bugs and weeds with toxic chemicals, regardless of the impact on consumers. The result is that our children, the most vulnerable in our society, are the collateral damage in this global power play.

Seneff: “Dr. Christian Bogner is making huge headway in understanding autism and its connection to vaccines and glyphosate! His work is brilliant!”

I want to tell you how autism comes about. Just to clarify: I am not against the concept of vaccination. I am against the toxins contained within vaccines. If you think the vaccine industry has tested all the ingredients on humans, you are deep in the woods. I invite you to examine the scientifically documented data and discover that what is happening is beyond concerning. Vaccines ARE linked to autism. And this is why.

…

Certain adjuvants in vaccines are powerful activators of brain microglia. Heavy metals like aluminum keep microglia in the activated state longer and make it difficult to switch into the anti-inflammatory state [23]. Aluminum is currently contained in DTaP, polio and Hib, Hepatitis A & B, Gardasil, Influenza and Pneumococcus [140]. As you will find out soon, there is an unreported chemical in vaccines that was found that prevents the microglia from flipping out of the inflammatory state. This chemical is called glyphosate [more below].

Choosing to vaccinate with all vaccines, or to skip some vaccines, or to skip all vaccines, is a personal choice. However, knowing the facts about what you are putting into your child’s body is an obligation that parents always have. Do the research, read the books, and make sure you understand all the facts by avoiding biased sources of information.

Let’s just say I’m not convinced. And apparently neither is Dr. Michael Podell, a Chicago-area veterinary neurologist and neurosurgeon, who told ABC7, "In the last year to year-and-a-half, we have seen more cases in this practice related to dogs who have recently been vaccinated. We are trying to understand what the risks are."

The Vaccine Did It: Mutated MMR Mumps Virus in the Brain of a Child Caused His Death, British Researchers Confirm

Published in the current issue of the journal, Acta Neuropathologica, the study is the first of its kind to conclusively demonstrate chronic brain damage in the form of "panencephalitis" due to a vaccine-derived strain of the mumps virus. In light of a recent epidemic of mumps in highly vaccinated populations, the research raises questions about the dangers of live vaccine virus mutations and about public health claims that the MMR is a completely safe and effective vaccine without serious side effects.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, RUSSELL BRUESEWITZ, ET AL., PETITIONERS v.WYETH LLC, FKA WYETH, INC., FKA WYETH LABORATORIES, ET AL ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT [February 22, 2011]

“Considered in light of the Vaccine Act as a whole, §22(b)(1)’s exemption from liability for unavoidably unsafe vaccines is just one part of a broader statutory scheme that reflects Congress’ careful balance between providing adequate compensation for vaccine-injured children and conferring substantial benefits on vaccine manufacturers to ensure a stable and predictable childhood vaccine supply.”

Paul Thomas: “I've been telling all my patients and everyone who will listen: DON'T USE ACETAMINOPHEN - ever!”

"The use of acetaminophen in babies and young children may be much more strongly associated with autism than its use during pregnancy, perhaps because of well-known deficiencies in the metabolic breakdown of pharmaceuticals during early development. Thus, one explanation for the increased prevalence of autism is that increased exposure to acetaminophen, exacerbated by inflammation and oxidative stress, is neurotoxic in babies and small children. This view mandates extreme urgency in probing the long-term effects of acetaminophen use in babies and the possibility that many cases of infantile autism may actually be induced by acetaminophen exposure shortly after birth," the 9 scientists write.

Healthline: There’s something folks on the other side have said … They think a lot of this is fueled by parents who understandably just want an answer, just something to blame, for their kids’ autism. What would be your response to that?

Kennedy: They are dismissing the stories of tens of thousands that saw the same thing happen to their children … What are the chances they all made up the same story? ... If this is not caused by mercury, then find out what it is and get rid of it.

I hope folks will take this opportunity to watch this docu-series. It's a total of 9 episodes from 1 1/2 to 2 hours. Each episode is available to watch for 24 hours, so get started early. It starts today and runs for 10 days.

You will be shocked when you hear Dr. Hooker’s interview about his contact with a CDC scientist who admitted that he and his colleagues were instructed to throw info they didn’t want to become public in a garbage can. His interview spans three episodes and I’ve posted an unofficial transcript of his interview (and Pompa’s) at the end of this post.

My other favorites were RFK, Jr.'s interview and Dr. Tenpenny's admission and regret that she was responsible for putting a father in jail for SIDS while his child lay dying. Dr. Pompa put everything together. All of these chemicals and ingredients (including gmo foods) together causes a storm of illnesses in the body. Who knew there was Thimerosal in contact lens solution?

JOIN DR. PATRICK GENTEMPO AND THE WORLD’S LEADING EXPERTS AS WE EXPOSE THE TRUTH BEHIND THE LARGEST HEALTH EXPERIMENT… EVER.

From: Dr. Patrick Gentempo

“There is an urgent cultural problem where there exists extreme conflict, contention and confusion regarding one of the most significant and controversial health debates of our day, forced vaccination. This has resulted in unprecedented oppression where government regulators, working unethically with multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical companies, have violated the rights of parents in deciding whether or not they want to inject potentially dangerous and at times lethal vaccine substances into their children. Further, the rights of health care professionals to speak freely regarding their views of vaccines have been trampled on with the threat of ridicule, censure and de-licensure. Additionally, workers are being forced by their employers to subject themselves to vaccines and the media has attacked anyone who questions today’s compulsory use of vaccines.

Vaccines Revealed exists to be a beacon of light that shines uninhibited truth on this critical subject. By aggregating the world’s leading experts on vaccines into a global forum where unbiased knowledge can be freely shared, we endeavor to be a resource for millions of enlightened parents and concerned people worldwide who wish to evaluate this topic and form an independent opinion from which they can act in their own interest.”

ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.

“People have asked me, “why are you doing this?“ This isn’t what I wanted to do. But I had a choice. I could put my head down and walk away from it – pretending I didn’t see it. Or, I could get involved and take the risk of doing that. And I have taken those risks and I have endured what came along with it, but I have endured it happily.

Because I believe that if I can spare one kid from getting this injury – from that pain…. God gave these children lives, and these companies are stealing that from them. That is a crime. That is assault and battery. It’s child abuse. In some cases it’s even worse. I feel like I didn’t have any choice about getting involved with this fight. And once I got involved with it, – I’m going to fight it until the end. And I’m not going to stand down. And I’m not going to give up. And I’m going to fight for you – and I’m going to fight for your children.”

Vaccines Revealed - Hosted by Dr. Patrick Gentempo

The Biggest Public Health Experiment...Ever - Your kids are already a part of the experiment...and you’re next. 9-part online docu-series.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. talks about Vaccine Court, Simpsonwood (1991 secret meeting of CDC scientists and Pharma reps where they decided to cover up the data that vaccines were harming, mainstream media), Scott Miller, filmmaker, vaccines in the military, Gulf War Syndrome, Anthrax, 20 minutes of the film "VAXXED."

"I've spent my life working on energy issues, environmental issues and global warming and rivers, but I've taken a hiatus to do just this issue because I cannot stand by and watch these children be poisoned, an entire generation of children being poisoned now...and we're going to take them on and beat them we're going to sue the government, pharmaceutical companies...we're figuring out different way to litigate this..."

Brian Hooker - He's a PhD in biochemical engineering, has been conducting biotechnology research for over 25 years, currently an Associate Professor of Biology at Simpson University, and also science advisor for the Focus For Health Foundation.

"There is no doubt in my mind that the vaccines that my son received caused his autism...It seemed as if every vaccine he received, would cause more damage..."

"...I was following the research at the CDC which at that point even though the CDC had not officially published any research on thimerosal, we knew because of some of the things that we being leaked out that the CDC had found a relationship between thimerosal containing vaccines and autism, especially within the first month of life. The CDC was actively working to cover that up with very dubious statistics and I knew something was dead wrong...

...and then the race was on. The CDC was trying to cover up this relationship. I was actively at that point calling CDC researchers, giving my input on their studies, studies that they were doing in the United States, studies that they were planning to do in Denmark, Italy, the UK. The CDC was so desperate at that time to find any population of children that would somehow indemnify thimerosal, that they were going to Greenland, they were looking at cohorts of individuals with autism in Greenland somehow to use that particular population to say there's no relationship between the thimerosal that you get in the infant schedule in the United States and autism. They were completely desperate and so I knew at that particular point in time I had to get involved."

Dawn Loughborough - She was an Executive Senior Consultant with Price Waterhouse. She's a Senior Program Manager with a background as CEO of an investment firm, and she obtained her masters degree in Law from the University of Baltimore.

Sarah Bridges - She is a Ph.D Neuropsychologist. She was a Senior Executive for a $1.7 billion fortune 1000 company, and a practice leader for the assessment of business at Personnel Decisions International, and innovator in the psychology and organizational consulting field.

Tonight's episode will reveal what Autism and Heart Disease have in common. And how it fits into the Vaccine Story.

See why Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D. Senior Scientist at MIT, makes this startling statement @ 1:54:40. "It's very disturbing where we are headed right now - and I see no end in sight."

We'll be delving deeper into the flu vaccine specifically. The independent voices you'll be learning from in episode 5 are willing to stand up against the so-called science of our modern flu vaccine dogma. These experts purely feel the need to communicate the dangers of the flu vaccines to the public so that people have better information, real information to prevent vaccine injuries. In spite of being told that the flu vaccine in particular is perfectly safe - (hey, we're even told it's safe for pregnant moms, infants and the elderly) - turns out it's probably not so "safe". The flu vaccine contains toxic amounts of mercury. We've been lied to by the media... -stating over and over again that mercury was removed from all vaccines. That's simply not true. The flu vaccine still contains mercury - an extremely toxic heavy metal.

You will have the delight of hearing from Sayer Ji again, and finally - Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D. In addition to the toxicity of mercury - you'll hear from Stephanie about how toxic aluminum is to us - especially our precious small children. These, and other serious toxins in our vaccines are causing great grief in families - right now.

The findings on the "adverse events" findings on Gardasil will have you shaking your head in disbelief. This is such an urgent and important message.

“They're going to make it mandatory...but now they're saying if you don't get the flu vaccine you have to get the mask. I want to make something...this is really important to me that what this does is it makes the people who get a flu vaccine believe that when they go in there and work with these people that they've protected them and they don't wear a mask. That's the tragedy, that if we actually want to be patient advocates here, everybody, what we have to understand is that if that flu shot has got false data to back it up it means that you're walking in there without a mask on because you believe you're protecting those people and you're not. That's where this does the most harm for me.”

Part 2 Brian Hooker and world premiere film Vaccines Injury regarding vaccines in the military and first responders. Hooker discusses how CDC scientist Wm. Thompson contacted him, the information he provided and how he was able to legally record four phone calls to prove it.

"Tonight, as a part of Vaccines Revealed docu-series, you can see the World Premier of the film, Vaccine Syndrome, from Oscar nominated filmmaker Scott Miller.

It will show you what we are doing with our dangerous, untested vaccine program making lab rats of our military."

"If you asked your doctor, “name 3 ingredients in that syringe”, most doctors wouldn’t be able to tell you. I feel it’s our responsibility as doctors to stand up for patients and stop stuffing them full of drugs."

"The National Vaccination Injury Compensation Program has been a disaster. ... It's a complete kangaroo court that's set up to make it look like we're trying to do something to compensate people who are injured by these vaccines."

"I can remember cases of my own that broke my heart...I remember the one father I put in jail for shaken baby syndrome, which is the person that I will never forget as I am looking into the eyes of his child and thinking, feeling very pompous about identifying shaken baby syndrome and watching the police haul this gentlemen away in handcuffs behind his eyes, I will go to my grave remembering that look on his face knowing now what I know...and to think here's his child who's dying and I'm the one who put him in jail and that's the reason why...and people will ask me why don't doctors get it, why don't pediatricians get it, and I always say it's because they'll have to do their own forgiveness work because they'll walk into their chartroom and look at all those charts...maybe I played a role in that, maybe that was me by injecting all of those kids and ignoring the signs and ignore when the parents when they would call me and tell me their kids were crying and saying oh, that's normal, they're just going to cry...and if they really realized what they were doing to destroy the human race and the dna of humanity they would have to stop, drop to their knees and say God forgive me and turn around and do something different..."

Part 3 of Dr. Brian Hooker's interview. Hooker talked about the cover up of the link between the MMR vaccine and autism. The top people at the CDC called a meeting and everyone was to bring all their copies of this study and they were told to put it in the trash can provided in the room. Dr. Thompson kept a copy of the study, including an electronic copy.

See transcript of Dr. Hooker’s interview at the bottom of this post.

What is thimerosal? From Trace Amounts page…

Thimerosal is a poison, neurotoxin, cancer-causer, and can interrupt the immune system and the normal development of an unborn baby or a child. Thimerosal is so toxic that putting it on your skin is illegal. However, the government not only allows but also defends its injection into the population, especially pregnant women and newborn children, as part of influenza vaccines currently recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Sayer Ji again! Make sure and catch what he says about “hazmat suits” in doctors offices in the first 5 minutes and the most controversial vaccine of all time… Gardasil.

You’ll be appalled when you hear what Brian Hooker (quickly becoming a watcher favorite) has to say about that @ 22:32 in this episode.

Dr. Heather Wolfson. Heather is married to Dr. Jack Wolfson - a Board-Certified Cardiologist. Dr. Heather Wolfson has a view on health and healing that will really reel you in and wait until you hear how Dr. Jack Wolfson was vilified for his atypical views on medicine @ 49:14.

AND FINALLY this is what you’ve overwhelmingly been clamoring for. I can’t even count the number of messages, emails and reaching out that you’ve done, with this singular question:

“Dr. Gentempo, what do I do now?”

Well, you are in for a real treat. Dr. Dan Pompa - a Cellular Detox Expert will be talking expressly about this issue - for those of you who’ve had those questions. You’ll be leaning in for this one. (See transcript of Dr. Pompa’s interview at the bottom of this post.)

Episode 10 extended

Dr. Tony Bark interviews Dr. Diane Harper on the HPV Gardisil vaccine and Merck, "Godmother of the vaccine movement," and founder of the National Vaccine Information Center, Barbara Loe Fisher, part 4 interview with Sayer Gi, Dr. Terry Wahls, the Check family and their attorney, Patricia Finn, on their legal battle.

Harper

Dr. Harper: “You see for Gardasil that protection is about forty percent. You see for Cervarix you see that it only has two types in the actual vaccine. That protection was ninety-three percent. So it shows that Cervarix has much more protection against HPV types that aren’t even in vaccine than does Gardasil. You don’t see that difference advertised because Merck was the first to market and they were a year and a half ahead of GSK. It truly is the marketing principle that one, which is whoever gets to market first gets over 90 percent of the market share and then people are anchored in what it is they purchased, what it is they think about and it’s very hard for them to change to something else.”

“So the public needs a simple message but unfortunately, that message was created by a for profit company and the simple message was at the time it came out, get Gardasil and your daughter will be one less meaning one less cervical cancer victim. Well in reality, she was never going to be a cervical cancer victim if she had gone on with her pap smears. So the concept of using fear to sell vaccines was prominent and knew that it could get a reaction from the public about I want to protect my daughter, I want to be a good parent.”

Dr. Bark: Do we know that injecting HPV dna in the bloom stream directly is safe? Where is evidence that … I understand in natural environment HPV is skin-to-skin, I understand that, but do we have any evidence to show that injecting HPV dna into somebody’s blood stream is safe

Dr. Harper: No.

In conclusion,

Dr. Bark: So it’s as though the vaccine and the whole marketing campaign around vaccine has reduced good behavior.

Dr. Harper: That’s right, and that is going to hurt women in the long run.

Dr. Bark: It will put them at higher risk for missed cancers.

Dr. Harper: That’s correct.

---------------

Fisher

Dr. Bark: Is it law that doctors have to give informed consent on vaccines?

Fisher: It is a federal law under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act that doctors are supposed to give parents ahead of time written information about the benefits and risks of vaccines and a description of vaccine reactions. Now the vaccine information statement that the CDC publishes is partly in existence because of that law and safety provision. Now we know that a lot of doctors don’t give parents anything because there’s no punishment or sanction in the law for not complying with the safety provisions.

You can purchase the series at their website. Also fyi, you can purchase a Jump Drive (All Episodes & Transcripts) for a much lower cost. To get to that option, you have to add a series to the cart, go to the cart page and look for the Jump Drive option down at the bottom left of the page, add it to the cart, delete the series option. Also fyi, I have no connection to this series and I get no monetary compensation for sharing this information.

My name's Brian Hooker and I have a Ph.D. in Biochemical Engineering. I've been involved in biotechnology research for over 25 years now. Currently Associate Professor of Biology at Simpson University and also Science Advisor for the Focus For Health Foundation. Prior to that, I worked in areas of Environmental Restoration and also Plant Genetic Engineering when I was a Senior Research Scientist at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. I am the father of an 18 year old son who was damaged by his infant vaccines and he has autism.

Dr. G: So Brian, your a Ph.D. in Biochemical Engineering. What type of work have you done over your career?

Dr. H: Over my career as a BE, I started working in environmental restoration. I was working primarily on EPA superfund sites, the sites that are considered the most contaminated and the most toxic in the United States, and so I worked in developing strategies using natural micro organisms that would degrade the contaminants, eat the contaminants and then release things that were innocuous.

Dr. G: For a period of time you were working and doing research for the US government, correct?

Dr. H: That is correct, yes. I worked for National Laboratory actually in Eastern Washington and the National Laboratory was co-located at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, which is a superfund site. It's one of the most laden with toxic waste sites in the country, taking some of the legacy waste, some of the waste that had been there for years and years and converting it to benign substances before the waste actually reached the Columbia River. We were running out the clock, trying to make sure that when, what we call these plumes of toxic waste would travel through the groundwater, we would want to be able to clean them up before they became a hazard to humans that were in, and animals in the environment, that all in that area were relying on the Columbia River.

Dr. G: Now you've also published several Papers, if I read your bio correctly, you have over 60 peer reviewed Papers to your credit?

Dr. H: That is correct. I started publishing as a part of my Ph.D. dissertation back in 1990 and I've continued to publish doing work starting out in environmental restoration, then I did some work in plant genetic engineering and ultimately where I am now at Simpson University. Then primarily I'm doing epidemiology research and something that is near and dear to my heart that is the connection between vaccines, vaccine components and neurodevelopmental disabilities like autism.

Dr. G: What got you interested in vaccine research?

Dr. H: What got me interested in vaccine research primarily was my son's adverse reaction to vaccines. We believe he had an adverse reaction and cumulative adverse reaction from all the vaccines that he received from two weeks of life all the way to his 15 month well baby check up and that's when he had his most severe reaction and we curtailed vaccination at that time. Because of that I became deeply interested in the connection between vaccines primarily I started out with the vaccine component Thimerosal. Thimerosal is about 50 percent mercury by weight, and it's used as a preservative in still in the flu shot. At that time it was used in three of the childhood vaccines that my son received and he was on a single day, and I didn't know this until after he had had his adverse reaction to vaccines, but on a single day he was receiving over 100 micrograms of mercury which vastly exceeded the EPA guidelines and the FDA guidelines for a single dose of mercury for an infant of his size. Even if he had received one of those vaccines when he was an adult, as an adult in order to correctly process that mercury based on the EPA guidelines, he would have had to weigh 550 pounds and he didn't weigh 550 pounds, he started out as an 8 pound infant and it just over whelmed his system.

Dr. G: It seems somewhat ironic that your career has been spent detoxifying the environment and yet you have a child who now has been vaccine damaged because of the toxic substances that went into the ecology of his system.

Dr. H: It's very ironic. I started out my career, I'm still doing environmental restoration as a part of my career and yet one of the most toxic things that I ever encountered was handling the body fluids from my son because he was detoxifying mercury and other components that are in vaccines, including aluminum, including formaldehyde and when I originally, when my wife and I originally made the decision to vaccinate my son, we had no idea that these poisons were in these vaccines in such high quantities. If I would have known what I know now, there is absolutely no way that we would have anybody touch him with any type of vaccine or any type of vaccine component and anything that enters his body as a practice now, anything that enters his body we look at the packet insert. We make sure that there's anything if there's anything that's questionable that that particular medication, that therapeutic, does not enter my son's body. We trusted the medical establishment because of my background, I grew up in a public health family. My mother served as a public health nurse for many, many years and we were taught that vaccinations were safe, there were efficacious and I remember when my son was being vaccinated for things like Chicken Pox thinking oh how convenient, he's never going have to get the Chickenpox, and he'll never have to miss school and, but little did I know, the toxic storm that at that point was going on in his body.

Dr. G: That was 18 years ago, now given what the vaccine schedule is today and the contents of the vaccines, how do you think he would have responded?

Dr. H: If we had vaccinated today, given the bloated CDC vaccine schedule, I really don't know if my son could have survived that. I think, you know, you hear of infants dying of within hours, days after receiving their two week, two month, four month, six month vaccines. I believe that he very well could have been one of those cases because his system, the schedule was so relatively innocuous in 1998 as compared to what it is today and his system couldn't even handle that and so knowing the toxins that are going in, knowing the multiple doses of vaccines that are going in left arm, right arm, left leg, right leg, in a single doctor's visit, I don't see how he could have survived.

Dr. G: Now, we'll talk about the science surrounding all of this or maybe the lack of science surrounding all this, but from the personal side here you are a young couple at that point you have a child and the child becomes vaccine damaged, how has that altered the course of your life and the experience of family?

Dr. H: Having a vaccine damaged child is basically living at ground zero of a nuclear explosion everyday, 24/7. Things that happened in our life were so drastically altered by my son's vaccine injury. We planned to have other children and because of his vaccine injury and because of the some of the moral choices we would make and not vaccinating our other children, we decided that it wasn't a choice that we could make. We couldn't look at him and say I'm sorry your vaccine damaged and your siblings dogged a bullet. So we did not have other children and part of the reason was because of the 24/7 care that my son needed. My son sleeps an average of 3 to 4 hours a night and so my wife and I have to take shifts, she stays up late with him, I wake up early with him. There's a constant battle in terms of deciding what type of supplementation we're going to give him, what type of therapies we're going to use for him, what type of individuals we're going to allow into our household that might provide care for him, because my wife does need to break away to do grocery shopping, to take care of our family's personal needs and so it is such a drastic alteration of life to see autism modeled in the press as oh these children are a little weird or a little geeky or they're just a little bit different than the mainstream society. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Dr. G: So you're a well credentialed research scientist with multiple degrees, publications, patents, etc., is there any doubt in your mind that the vaccines caused his autism?

Dr. H: There is no doubt in my mind that the vaccines that my son received caused his autism. There is absolutely no doubt. We saw the regression, we saw the implications of every vaccine that he received on the schedule. It seemed as if every vaccine that he received would cause more damage and then we would see a little more damage and as new parents we didn't really have a baseline, we did not have other siblings that we could compare my son's development to. I remember teaching my son how to crawl and having a conversation with another parent and that parent saying, well you know how kids just pick up things on their own, and I scratched my head, I was stymied, like my son doesn't really pick up anything on his own. We've taught him to sit up, we've worked hours to get him to sit up, we've taught him to roll over, we've taught him to crawl, we've come up with games, moving blankets around so it would force him to crawl. We worked to get and hit every milestone and the milestones that we did hit we're all abolished when he received his 15 month vaccines. Before my son's 15 month vaccines he had language, he was speaking, we have him on video saying short phrases referring to the dog next door which was one of his wonderful passions when he was one years old. Then all of that is lost. There are things that we have captured my son doing on video before his 15 month vaccines that he still cannot do to this day.

Dr. G: Is he verbal today?

Dr. H: No, my son is nonverbal. He has a few words he can say, mama, daddy, yes, no and that's really just about it. He does understand language, we can give him simple commands and we're working through communicating with him through an Ipad, but other than that, there is no expressive language.

Dr. G: So I think you're to be commended with your wife on an extraordinary expenditure of energy and emotion to adapt your entire lives for the needs of your son. It's really incredible. What is the financial impact?

Dr. H: The financial impact is immense. The outlay that you never see that is never talked about in the media is the shear damage that my son can do to physical property. Things having to be replaced, things that he needs. He has his routines and his certain videos that he has to watch, but he also doesn't understand that if he breaks those videos that they have to be replaced. If he puts a whole in the wall, and he has been in severe pain and unfortunately where he is not violent against other people but he's self injurious, so he'll knock his shoulder up against the wall, he'll put a whole in the wall, we have to get the hole in the wall repaired and then on top of that, many of the therapies that we use with him are not covered by insurance, obviously the over-the-counter supplements, the things we have taken on to keep his primarily his gastrointestinal system which is, you know what's screwed up from stem to stern you know from his esophagus, all the way down to his rectum, we had problems and so medically we have to address that. So the financial outlay is immense. In order to provide for my family and provide for this sort of intense drain on our budget, then not only am I a professor at a university but I also run a consulting firm, I consult for multiple clients and I teach adjunct at a community college. So I'm juggling three jobs and having a family in order to provide financially because of the train wreck that autism is.

Dr. G: So, a little bit of a touch question, do you ever reflect on how life would have been different for you and your family if this didn't happen?

Dr. H: That's a really good question, I reflect on that on a regular basis. This year the beginning of the semester when I had students come in for their classes was rather hard on me because this would have been the freshman year of college that my son would have started if he hadn't have been vaccine damaged and seeing these young adults come in, take their classes, buy their books, study, interact with their peers, go have a good time, go to movies, drive a car, all of these things that my son cannot do, it really, really hit me hard this year. It was the first time that I had actually encountered that. We've homeschooled my son since he was four years old. We had a bad experience in a public preschool and at that point we decided that we would withdraw him from the school district, and so we chose to homeschool him but, this was the first time I interacted with students that were the same age as my son and saw the, just the complete difference, going home and helping my son with his Barney videos, watching Barney, watching Bob the Builder, watching things that just are not age appropriate for an 18 year old whose voice has changed, who's developing a beard. These are just not the things that you plan in life.

Dr. G: So with this obviously if you had understood the nature of vaccines, the risks of vaccines, the components of vaccines and especially with your education and academic background, you had had the to make other choices perhaps at least the opportunity to weigh it out and decide if this was the right thing or not and you've now done a good bit of research and in the vaccine community, in the autism community, you've become a very strong advocate for getting the truth out there, where has this lead you this journey to discover, why does the public not know about this, why do parents not know about this, why is it maybe a bad idea that the government wants to mandate that children get vaccinated? So talk about that journey a little bit.

Dr. H: Well my journey started in 2001. That's the first time that the Institute of Medicine (IOM) which is a part of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), that was the first time they convened a meeting and they specifically convened a meeting regarding Thimerosal, the mercury containing preservative that was in three of the series of vaccines that my son received, that's the first time that there was every any type of public meeting where parents could participate, parents could send in comments. I was on the west coast, the meeting was in the east coast but, I was firing away emails to the NAS, I was following the research at the CDC which at that point, even though the CDC had not officially published any research on Thimerosal, we knew because of some of the things that were being leaked out, that the CDC had found a relationship between Thimerosal containing vaccines and autism, especially within the first month of life. The CDC was actively working to cover that up with very dubious statistics and I knew something was dead wrong and I was, with the internet really starting to grow at that particular point in time, the early 2000's, I was starting to meet other parents, other families, other people that were going through the same nightmare in their own personal lives that my family was going through and so I became active. In my past research I had done a lot of statistics. When you clean up a superfund site and you say it's clean, you have to prove it to some level of certainty . So I had developed an expertise in statistics and I tried to and I believe was successful in applying that expertise to the epidemiology that the powers that be, the CDC, the NIH, the things, and the FDA, the things they were relying upon in order to somehow proclaim in a very religious fashion that Thimerosal was safe. We knew that it was preposterous that anybody would say mercury, in any form, was safe to inject into an infant's body. We knew that and so the eyes were on the NAS, the IOM did deem that they could not rule out a relationship between T containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disabilities and then the race was on. The CDC was trying to cover up this relationship. I was actively at that point calling CDC researchers, giving my input on their studies, studies that they were doing in the United States, studies that they were planning to do in Denmark, Italy, the UK. The CDC was so desperate that at that time to find any population of children that would somehow indemnify Thimerosal that they were going to Greenland. They were looking at cohorts of individuals with autism in Greenland to somehow to use that particular population to say there's no relationship between the Thimerosal that you get in the infant schedule in the United States and autism. They were completely desperate and so I knew at that particular point in time I had to get involved.

Dr. G: Wow, ... quite a journey because you ended up in communication with CDC scientists and most notably probably, Dr. Thompson. So you had a series of conversations now that have now been made public and some of them were recorded and were made public and it's kind of out there and people are seeing you know kind of behind the curtain. Can you speak to those conversations and what Dr. Thompson revealed to you?

Dr. H: Dr. Thompson was one of the scientists that I interacted with very early on in an official capacity. When I contacted the CDC's public liaison, she referred me to Dr. Thompson and another physician by the name of David Shay, who was working with Dr. Thompson at the time and so we had several very abrupt conversations, the CDC didn't like what I was saying, I received a cease and desist letter in 2004 from a CDC attorney saying that I was no longer allowed to contact these scientists, that the only recourse that I had was through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Dr. G: Why do you think that they felt so threatened that they had to cease and desist just to have conversations with their own scientists from one person who's got expertise in biostatistics and others and saying hey I want to talk to you about this. Why were they so threatened by that?

Dr. H: I knew because of my background in statistics, I knew what they were doing. I knew that they were actively working hard to bury a relationship that they didn't want to go public and I knew that the reason why they were doing that, I had recovered emails via the FOIA...

Dr. G: For those that don't understand that FOIA is the Freedom of Information Act, the CDC it's a government entity and we the citizenry have rights to get disclosed, not all of information is available to us but a lot of information is available to us so you filed this request for FOIA and if they honor the request they'll give you certain documents, so what did you find?

Dr. H: I received documents early on from the CDC and I found that in the background the chief scientists in vaccine safety were trying to preserve the vaccination program. They had no intent to help children but everything was focused on oh, we have to preserve the vaccine program and we have to keep that going. And there's also...

Dr. G: Why do you think that is? Why do you think they seemed so hell bent, these are scientists supposedly they are serving the cause of humanity. Why do you think they were hell bent on preserving the vaccine program as compared to reporting the data as they saw it?

Dr. H: The CDC acts as a vaccine company. They buy 4.6 billion dollars worth of vaccines every year from pharmaceutical companies and they take those vaccines and they distribute them to the state health departments.

Dr. G: So they're a purchasing agent also not just a researching entity but a purchasing agent?

Dr. H: They are a purchasing agent and they're extremely conflicted. They did not want vaccination rates to go down primarily because if vaccination rates went down they would not be reimbursed for the vaccines that they were buying to be distributed by state public health departments. So, it's big business. It's big money. 4.6 billion dollars were on the line and that's when you see a scientist talking about the nebulous well, we have to keep the vaccine program going, we can't damage the vaccine program, when you see a CDC scientist saying that, basically what they are saying in the background is we need to get our reimbursement of that 4.6 billion.

Dr. G: So you start submitting your first FOIA requests, what comes back?

Dr. H: The first FOIA requests that I submitted were in 2004 and just to backup, the primary reason I was submitting those requests was because CDC had cut off any scientist to scientist contact that I had with Thompson or any of the other scientists in the vaccine division so, my only recourse to get information from CDC was via the FOIA and I started to submit requests and one of the first things that came back was a big cheat on a study that had come out of Denmark.

Dr. G: A big cheat, what does that mean?

Dr. H: Cheat. It means that they used statistics to lie about the autism incidents in Denmark.

Dr. G: That's an extremely bold statement so you're asserting it like with full certainty, so why do you say that?

Dr. H: I have full certainty that what they did, somebody got the big idea that autism rates were increasing in Denmark even though they had removed Thimerosal from the vaccines in 1992. So therefore if there was a connection between Thimerosal and vaccines and the autism epidemic, then you should have seen numbers go down in Denmark. Okay? What they did was they published false data showing a very false increase in the incidence of autism in Denmark. But it came to data that was in 1999, 2000 and 2001 when the oldest kids were actually able to get an autism diagnosis and there was a steady downward trend. So what CDC did in connection with the Denmark researchers is that they recommended that they remove the last data point so the only thing that you would see was an upward trend and the autism diagnosis after they removed Thimerosal from vaccines and we know, historically, we know now that's what is called the Mardsen study, it came out in 2003 in the Journal of Pediatrics (JOP) and historically that study has been debunked but I actually got the emails where they made the decision that they were not going to put the last data points in the study because they indeed showed a downward trend and that was counter to CDC policy to keep Thimerosal in vaccines.

Dr. G: So let me get clear, you've actually seen emails where they said we're going to remove certain data points to give a false impression of autism rates so people will not draw the correlation between Thimerosal, in this particular case Thimerosal and autism?

Dr. H: You have to understand the CDC never puts that type of verbiage in an email. They will never say something like that. But they had a coauthor from Denmark who was saying these data sets, these data points are important and but we need to include them in the publication and then the principle investigator who was at the CDC at the time said no, we have to have a discussion and we may have to remove that data and we know historically, if you go back to the Paper, they removed the information that would have shown a downward trend, not an upward trend, but a downward trend after they removed Thimerosal in vaccines.

Dr. G: And was there any reason given for the removal for the person at the CDC advocating no, no, we need to remove that data, did they give a reason?

Dr. H: No.

Dr. G: Just the fact that it had to be removed.

Dr. H: There was no evidence, there was no reason, there was no scientific reason to remove that data point. The data point was clear. It was data from 2000 and 2001. It needed to be included because it showed the rates were going down. So there's no scientific reason to do that.

Dr. G: So now, this is roughly 2004 or so (Dr. H: That's correct.) so now you're seeing the first evidence, I'm talking about evidence, not speculation (Dr. H: Right) that they are literally manipulating data, omitting information to get a certain outcome impression in their data that they want to release publicly? (Dr. H: Right.) What happened after that?

Dr. H: The information started tumbling in from the CDC and one of the things you know people have asked me before why did you FOIA the CDC so many times. Well, it was easy. All I had to do was shoot off an email and the CDC would process the information and at first the information was coming back in a very, very timely basis. I would get information maybe five, six months after submitting the request, which in government terms, was a short period of time. I was analyzing the information along with David Guyer who is a very prolific scientist who works with his dad, Mark Guyer, who published many, many studies on Thimerosal and we would go through the information together just glean anything that we could that would show the evidence of fraud, evidence of manipulation or evidence of taking whole data sets and hiding them from the public and that's probably the thing that stuck out the most was what CDC was trying to do, they were coming up with their own fraudulent studies and then by law they were supposed to supply the data so independent scientists could check their work but what they were doing in the background was they were playing a shell game so they could hide that data so nobody could get access to the data, reanalyze the studies and show the faults and the fatal flaws in their science.

Dr. G: So you were extrapolating these conclusions by teasing out bits and pieces from all the FOIA information that came back to you?

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: What kind of volume are we talking about? How much stuff are they sending you?

Dr. H: I've probably received, I'd say 500,000 pages of documents.

Dr. G: 500,000 pages?

Dr. H: Some of them are redacted, redacted means that the information is blocked out and removed, some are actually just full clean copies of information. I received a contract between the CDC and the IOM regarding their final meeting in 2004 which basically put the nails in the coffin in terms of the government's response on Thimerosal in vaccines.

Dr. G: How so?

Dr. H: The 2004 IOM, the committee met in February of that year and they submitted a report, the report came out in May and not only did they say that there was no conclusive evidence showing a relationship between Thimerosal exposure and autism, but they also went further in an unprecedented move and they said that no research should be done further on this particular link and you know when somebody's saying no research should be done on a particular link, that they're trying to hide something.

Dr. G: Wow, what's going through your mind at this point? It's 2004, you're the father of an autistic child, you have basically done the research and math to say this much mercury went into his body, that's an extraordinary amount of toxicity and that my child is autistic, it's disrupted and transformed my entire life, my wife's life, our family, etc., I'm a research scientist, and you've got a background in statistics and you start getting this information and you see literally the malfeasance and now I could understand the (inaudible) saying wow this is really wrong, etc. but what's going on in the kind of the psycho emotional side that you're seeing this and realizing the damage it's done to your family and that they're trying to hide this stuff. How did that feel?

Dr. H: It was very, very difficult. Between 2004 until about 2007 I literally for my own emotional stability, I took a break in 2007 and I curtailed some of my FOIA activities just because I needed to rest. When you look at that much evil in the face on a regular basis and you know people are lying wholesale about a large portion of children in our society, it's very, very difficult to sleep at night. I didn't realize that the government entities could be as evil and corrupt as the CDC was and still is, and so I worked very, very hard to get the information to some level of closure. I put out a website with another autism dad who's actually very, very active in community, J.B, Handley. J.B. and I published a website called Put Children First .org and many of the information requests and many of the responses to the information requests that I received were put out on that website and it had an entire narrative specifically at that time regarding Thimerosal in vaccines. I also had, I just was starting to come to the grips with the fact that the CDC was studying Thimerosal in vaccines because they were trying to put down the furor that was in the public regarding children's exposure to mercury. What that meant was that there was an entire vaccination schedule, there was an entire laundry list of other components that because there was no furor about the CDC wasn't studying. Okay, so that threw everything regarding the vaccination program in doubt.

Dr. G: And you have to imagine, so here you are this huge government institution that has the public trust and that they are also buying 4.6 billion of vaccines a year that they are actually a purchaser of billions of dollars of these things to imagine that if they said oops, we made a mistake. How could they possibly admit to that but now you're pinned in a corner in a respect because we will lose the faith of the American people, we will be under extraordinary attack but if we continue to try and protect and hide the results that we know to be true, more kids are being damaged and families destroyed every single day.

Dr. H: It just flat out appeared from the documents that I received via the FOIA that the CDC didn't care. There was such a huge level of callousness and enmity for the parents of affected children.

Dr. G: So when you say evil, that's what you mean.

Dr. H: Not only did I hate the CDC but the CDC hated parents like me. They hated anybody that would question the status quo. Anybody that would rail against the advisory committee for immunization practices and the schedule that they put out every year. Anybody that would raise a stink against that. I was calling my congressional official, I was calling my two senators, they were conducting their own independent investigations. At that time Dr. David Weldon was a member of Congress, he was running his own independent investigation. I was working with his office on that investigation and so the CDC instead of looking at that and responding appropriately and saying we have a problem, we have not only a public relations problem but a scientific and a grave medical problem. They continued to cover up and they became very, very polarized against anybody that like I said would rail against the status quo.

Dr. G: Now 2004, 2007, you're crawling through huge volumes of documents, you're seeing this as you referred to it as the face of evil and now in 2007 you need to take a break. What happens then?

Dr. H: In 2007 I took a break from the activity, I finished my career up at the National Laboratory and made the decision to move on.

Dr. G: Well incidentally this is interesting, while this is going on you're working for the government.

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: The government hired you because they felt your credentials as a scientist, researcher, etc. in your area of expertise, they felt that you were worthy of employment for that. In the meantime you're looking at what the government's doing in a different branch of the government and seeing all this malfeasance and now you know you couldn't write this story in a novel to make it believable. Now 2007 you decide you're going to leave that government position or you're going to move on to another phase of your career and take a break from all this activity in reviewing the CDC's activities.

Dr. H: That is correct, I suspended the activities in 2007. I also then concluded my career as more of a prolific researcher scientist in 2009. I left the National Laboratory and then became a part of the faculty at Simpson University in 2010. I felt there was an intense amount of scrutiny that National Laboratory was a great environment to do research but it was also in and of itself it was a pressure cooker of a job and having those types of responsibilities and having a special needs child at home and a wife who has sacrificed her career to take care of a special needs child at home, then I needed to have a change.

Dr. G: So now what happens, when did you reengage, what encouraged you to re engage in this?

Dr. H: I started my job at Simpson University in 2010 and very early on I contacted Mark and David Guyer and wanted to talk to them about some of the FOIA requests that I had done at the very beginning back in 2004. I felt like there was more information available. The CDC had done a level best job of withholding, redacting, marking out information that I felt was vital and would expose more of the lies in terms of the studies that the CDC was saying was reliable evidence to show that vaccines and vaccine components were safe. In conversation with the Guyers, we decided to sue the CDC.

Dr. G: You sued the CDC?

Dr. H: Yes July, 2011 with my attorney Bob Reeves. We filed a suit against the CDC for withholding information for the four first FOIA requests that I had ever submitted. These had to deal with studies on Thimerosal that involved Denmark, studies on Thimerosal that involved the UK, and several internal series of documents that I was trying to get from the CDC and at first I felt that this would be a very, very simple endeavor and that I had seen the documentation, we were in the Obama Administration. At the beginning of his administration he had filed a presidential order to say that entities like the CDC needed to err on the side of being able to release, err on the side of openness and so I was using that even as some of my exhibits in the lawsuit so I thought okay the CDC will see this and they'll finally release those documents. But instead what ensued was a two year fight against the CDC, tooth and nail, where we were filing motion after motion and then they would file motions not only to, not only against what we had filed as evidence, but motions to vacate previous decisions that the judge had made.

Dr. G: Really, so the judge had ruled on some motions and they wanted him to vacate those rulings.

Dr. H: Right, right, at that point in time the judge was ruling that the CDC turn over documents that had been improperly withheld, documents that had been improperly redacted and the CDC was trying to vacate those motions and the fight ended almost exactly two years later in July, 2013 and during that particular period of time the CDC had to release about 500 pages, more pages of documents because of the order of the federal judge and then we finally, rather than having to go through the appeals process with the case, we finally came up with a settlement with the CDC but the thing that stood out was the CDC was fighting tooth and nail not to release this information.

Dr. G: In 2014, you start to having phone conversations with Dr. William Thompson of the CDC.

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: So give me the lead up to that, so how did those communications start because you been in communication with him since the early 2000's, right?

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: So then what happened that got him to get on the phone with you?

Dr. H: As part of the lawsuit some documents surfaced that showed in the background Dr. William Thompson talking to CDC attorneys and actually attorneys who were fighting against my son in vaccine court, they were having these conversations behind the scenes as early as 2003 and 2004. To this day I have no clue why Dr. Thompson would be talking about my son's particular vaccine injury case, and so I emailed him, I was furious, and I didn't care if the CDC said that I couldn't email CDC scientists. I looked up his email address and I started emailing him and saying how could you talk about my son's case behind his back, how could you use that in order to curtail my conversations with CDC scientists, how could you use that against me, and I think I wore him down because low and behold you know I probably sent him three or four emails over the period of three or four months and then in November of 2013, I receive a phone call, I look down, it's a 404 area code, it's the CDC. I'd received harassing calls from the CDC FOIA office before and anonymous phone calls from the CDC before, so I knew not to pick up the phone. I didn't want to deal with what could be at the other end of the line but my curiosity got the best of me and I did a reverse phone lookup and low and behold it was Dr. William Thompson.

Dr. G: What happened when you got on the phone, what did he say?

Dr. H: We actually had a very, very polite conversation. One of the first things he asked was about my son and how my son was doing and he was almost apologetic in tone and this was somebody that was very, very different than the phone conversations that I had had with him back in 2003, 2004. He was a different man, he was a changed man and I could tell that right away just by sort of a conciliatory tone and it took about two phone conversations for him to say I know you're looking for information, I know you want to get into the central repository of vaccine safety data from the CDC, you're going about it in all the wrong ways, here's what you do.

Dr. G: He wanted to help you?

Dr. H: He wanted to help me get data sets so somebody on the outside could independently analyze the data sets and see first hand the flaws of the CDC.

Dr. G: So basically, he knew that there was something wrong with the way they were analyzing the data and he knew that you were looking to try to get that data to analyze it independently of the CDC but he also knew that you weren't going about it in the right way and he was giving you guidance.

Dr. H: That is correct and very, very quickly he showed me how to submit a release for a public data set and by law the CDC when they use federal funds to do a vaccine study they have to come up with a public data set that the general public, primarily scientists on the outside, can have access to and through his guidance, by January 2014 I was swimming in data that I never knew existed.

Dr. G: Wow, what motivated him, what did he see from the inside that made him want to help guide you from the outside?

Dr. H: He was motivated and this came out December 2013, January 2014 time frame, he knew that the CDC was doing bad statistics. He knew and he was telling me that the CDC was actually lying about the relationship between vaccines and autism.

Dr. G: You used the word lying, ...so knowingly were lying about the, what data they were reporting relative to vaccines and autism.

Dr. H: Right, he knew that not only, it started out a little more innocuous and he was talking about the flaws and the methodology that the CDC was using and then all of a sudden the conversation turned on a dime and we were talking about fraud.

Dr. G: Wow, do you think his conscience got to him, what do you think happened?

Dr. H: I think that this is something that had been brewing in his conscience since 2004 since when he saw just very, very specific blatant fraud by his superiors at the CDC and this is what he was reporting to me and he wanted to make sure that somebody on the outside knew that this fraud had taken place, and the that way he wanted to go about doing that was to give me the data and to publish, for me to publish the results in peer reviewed scientific literature that showed yes, there is a relationship and we started out with the MMR vaccine, which I undertook in trepidation because I was not an expert at that time regarding the MMR but we started out with a study that was fraudulent and flawed that he did in 2004 and he said I want you to reanalyze that data set

Dr. G: So just to get clear because this is very dramatic, a research scientist at the CDC who's involved in the autism study in MMR autism relationship which was one of the prime studies to debunk the relationship, because Andy Wakefield was completely discredited over, his minor assertion in the beginning that there might be a relationship here and then everybody says ... that it's been disproven that there's a relationship between the two, the CDC study, etc. This was something that was a milestone study and the guy who's on the research project contacts you and says please get this information and reanalyze it.

Dr. H: That is correct. He was the lead statistician on this particular study, the first author was Frank DeStefano who was and still is the head of the Immunization Safety Office (ISO) at CDC. One of the authors was Colleen Boyle, who is pretty much second in command at the CDC. She's a head of one of the major centers The National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. Another chief researcher Marcia (inaudible), and then a postdoc who was just on loan from her university. The five of them colluded to cover up the results, several different alarming results that showed when you get the MMR on time you are indeed more susceptible and more likely to get an autism diagnoses than when you delay it until after three years of age.

Dr. G: Wow, so again strong words, colluded that literally and did Thompson talk about this collusion that these people got together and eliminated data from the study to make it appear a certain way?

Dr. H: He would talk about it in a very vague terms but he did use the word collude and he used very, very strong language to say that the data that the data that were published were completely fraudulent, that they had embarked upon the study and he started to share documentation, documentation of how the study was supposed to be done in the first place and then he guided me through the steps on how they deviated from that plan because they saw relationships between the MMR and autism and they did not want to publish them.

Dr. G: The hair on the back on my neck is literally standing up right now, so here you are and incidentally you've had numerous conversations with him for which were recorded so that you have documentary evidence to say these conversations are real (Dr. H: That's right.) and it's validated that these things were said and many more things that weren't recorded but the point is so here you are the parent of an autistic child who has the course of your entire life altered because of vaccines that your child was given and you're on the phone now with a research scientist from the CDC who publishes with other coauthors a Paper and he's the lead guy on the statistics for the Paper and is basically saying that there is collusion between these authors to misrepresent the data to try to show that there was not a relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism and yet the reality is that if you look at the data they had there is, and so now you are saying not only how are you affected but because of the collusion how many other families out there are sitting there with autistic kids because this information was never represented properly or truthfully.

Dr. H: The CDC knew about these relationships as early as November 7, 2001 because I have the memo that says November 7, 2001 and it delineates these relationships and it shows a positive relationship with the MMR and autism among African Americans, it showed an association with what the CDC terms isolated autism, that's kids like my son that got autism but didn't have any other types of co-morbidity like cerebral palsy or mental retardation that just basically regressed into autism there were strong statistically significant relationships CDC knew about it November 7, 2001 and you look at how many kids have been born since then, how many kids have been diagnosed with autism since then and how many kids actually got the MMR on time and how many lives, how many families could have been saved.

Dr. G: In your wildest dreams do you think you would have ever gotten to the point where you're on the phone (inaudible) with a CDC scientist who's on the autism study with MMR calling you and talking to you and basically saying reanalyze this data please and saying there is collusion between the scientists that there's fraud in the way that they're representing the data that you are a family that's affected. You know in 2001 you already reviewed that they were hiding things, I think you said November 7, 2001 that there was email traffic that you got through FOIA, all these years, all these kids getting vaccinated and one of the things, that I know because I've had conversations with you previously and I've watched Vaxxed, etc., but one of the things is that what they showed in this study was that if you delayed the use of the MMR vaccine the risk of autism goes down precipitately, correct?

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: I mean it was an obvious thing and they didn't even want to report that, they could have just said hey we have new data delay this but then it would admit that the people who followed the schedule in the beginning, have autistic kids as a result of their recommendations so they couldn't admit it.

Dr. H: The CDC would never go on record and admit that, so they chose to cover it up and what they did is they sat on that information for a year and a half, they would meet weekly, these five scientists would meet on a weekly basis, they would have Thompson rerun the data, reanalyze the data, he could not make the effect go away.

Dr. G: Even trying making the effect go away by reanalyzing the data or using different statistical manipulation, he still couldn't make it go away.

Dr. H: He couldn't make that information go away and so what they decided to do specifically with the African Americans, was they said we will only rely on race data for those individuals that have a valid State of Georgia birth certificate. So it took that population and it reduced it by almost a half, it became half as large and everybody that knows statistics knows that if you have a smaller sampling size you lose statistical power, you lose the relationship and so they used that, there was no good reason to say that oh we got race data from birth certificates because the race data was in all the school records for all the children that were participating in that study. The only reason they did that was to reduce the statistical power the scientists that were Thompson's superiors said run it this way and see what happens and low and behold when they eliminated those kids, the relationship went away.

Dr. G: And there could be no logic, they're saying oh I know one way we can reduce the sample sizes, if they don't have a Georgia birth certificate, as if that changes them genetically somehow, if that changes their species, why should it matter what birth certificate they have to the study and the population in the study. Is there any rational?

Dr. H: There is no effective rational for that. There is no scientific reason for that. It is clear cut that what they wanted to do was reduce the statistical power so they could make that relationship go away and when they were able to do that, Dr. Coleen Boyle and Dr. Frank DeStano called a meeting, said bring in all of your information regarding the effect with African Americans and we are going to throw it away, we are going to destroy that information. I don't have the exact day that they met but it was between September and October 2002 so that they've been sitting on that data for about eight months and they decided that they would trash can that data and if you look at the information that the CDC had after the trashcan meeting, those results were nowhere to be found. They buried them.

Dr. G: Whoa, Dr. Thompson who was on the study affirms that this shredding party, if you will, happened?

Dr. H: Dr. Thompson was there at the shredding party. Interestingly enough the superior who ordered the shredding party, Dr. Coleen Boyle, decided not to attend that particular meeting so her fingerprints were all over the meeting but she would not do the dirty work.

Dr. G: So literally these scientists on this project got together ordered together by their superiors to get together and said we want to eliminate this data and we are literally going to shred or discard, dispose of this data so we have no record of it.

Dr. H: That is correct, that is a violation of the Federal Records Act of 1950 as amended in the 1970's they were taking federal records that information could have been considered federal information and they instead of handling it properly and archiving the federal records, they destroyed it.

Dr. G: And when you look at the study it obviously isn't there and then they can say it's nowhere to be found except they didn't count on the fact that Dr. Thompson kept a copy.

Dr. H: Dr. Thompson knew that he would be legally liable for destroying that information so he retained his own copy of not only the hard copies but he also had the electronic copies of the hard drive of his computer and that's what ultimately what he shared with me.

Dr. G: This is kind of a pretty damming situation for these CDC officials because if I understand correctly Congressman Posey in Florida has a copy of this in his safe and there trying to call Dr. Thompson as a whistleblower to appear in front of Congress and talk about this fraud and deception.

Dr. H: That is correct. Dr. Thompson during the conversations that we had I wanted Dr. Thompson to do two things. I wanted him to hire a whistleblower attorney and declare federal whistleblower status so that he had the protections that were afforded by that particular status. He did that, he ended up getting one of the top whistleblower attorneys in the country in order to represent himself. The second thing that I wanted him to do was reach out to Congressman Bill Posey. Bill Posey has been sympathetic regarding the autism vaccine issue since he took office I believe in 2012 and so when he took office, when he took over he was a friend of our community and Dr. Thompson then went to him with large bins of information, physically took bins of information to Bill Posey's office, set those down and shared all the records that he had shared with me up to that point in time and we're talking about tens of thousands of pages of documents that showed CDC fraud that showed CDC (inaudible) inclination that when they found a positive relationship that showed a tie between a vaccine or vaccine component and autism that they would either bury the relationship entirely by throwing it in the trash can or they would downplay the relationship and make sure that the final publication had verbiage that said there's nothing to worry about, there's nothing to worry about the MMR, there's nothing to worry about Thimerosal, so indeed instead of changing the vaccine schedule to err on the side of safety they changed the vaccine schedule to err on the side of more profits for the pharmaceutical companies and themselves acting as a vaccine company.

Dr. G: Wow, I'm basically speechless so I can't imagine what's going on inside of your mind cause you're wearing all these hats, first of all your like the investigator who's discovering all this, you have a child that's vaccine damaged, you're a research scientist yourself so you understand these things on a deep level as far as how this could be pulled off and how they could pull the wool over one's eyes and you were also cognitive to the fact that there are children damaged every single day right now because this information is not public. What do you feel inside?

Dr. H: I was completely conflicted, when my head hit the pillow at night I would think about the lives that could be saved if this information was made public and I would try to weigh that against continuing the relationship with Thompson and other documents that he could funnel from the CDC to me in order to you know bring the CDC down which is you know I think it's still a worthy goal and if something needs to happen we need complete reform in the CDC. Thompson himself told me that vaccine safety didn't belong in the CDC or in the Department of Health and Human Services as a whole, it needed to be moved out, it needed to be an independent agency so, I weighed that effecting change against CDC and being able to reform this so somebody somewhere could know that the CDC came clean versus how many people were diagnosed with autism today. How many people are going to be diagnosed with autism tomorrow. How many people are going to comply blindly with a bloated vaccination schedule that's a recipe for disaster, it's a grand medical experiment. It hasn't been researched properly and the research that has been done shows grave danger for people who follow that vaccination schedule and so I was very, very conflicted. I also worked early on, it was never really palatable for me to record phone conversations with Dr. Thompson especially without his knowledge. I did not want him to know that I was recording these conversations because I wanted him to speak honestly, I wanted him to repeat some of the things that he had said to me in conversations with me that I had not recorded and so I had two attorneys working with me to make sure that what I was doing was not illegal. Now, I life in California, California is a two party consent state so it is illegal to record somebody without their knowledge. I'm next door to Oregon so two of the calls that were recorded were made in Oregon, another one of the calls was made in Virginia which is a one party state and then the final call was made in Illinois which is a one party state and so I needed to protect my family, I wanted some type of proof that this had happened. I wanted some type of evidence, some type of timestamp that said we had these conversations, this is definitively Bill Thompson revealing this information to me. This isn't me with a pile of information this was me with a government employee who's making admissions of collusion to commit fraud by senior CDC officials and that's why I recorded those calls.

Dr. G: And not only is it government employee it's not like some ad...(inaudible) person going I don't know what's going on in the other room over here it's the guy in the center of it basically he's one of the guys on the study but here's the thing out in the world when you mention autism and vaccines, oh, but that's been disproven, they look at you like you're some kind of idiot oh, that's been refuted, that's been scientifically proven, so now people are lining up saying now I don't have to worry about this that's all been disproven because of what's been put out and they are vaccinating these kids and literally even if you decided that you wanted to vaccinate which is probably based on everything that we know not a good idea but even if you decide I want to do it literally if they just reported the data and they delayed in the administration of the MMR vaccine that would reduce the risk you're taking by a lot according to the data that that study originally gathered.

Dr. H: That is correct. If you look at the original data and I did the analysis, I did the analysis in January and February of 2014 I saw that the risk for African American males that received the MMR on time was three times greater than African American males that got the MMR vaccine after three years of age.

Dr. G: Three times greater?

Dr. H: Three times greater. There was three times as much autism.

Dr. G: It's not like a 15 or 20 percent, it's three times more likely to get autism if they vaccinate before 36 months as compared to after?

Dr. H: That is correct, that is correct.

Dr. G: In the African American population.

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: And that's what they said, we're going to bury that data, we're going to dispose of that data, we're not reporting it at all but it's in the original.

Dr. H: It's in the original study. It's in their data and it was I attempted to publish that information. I had a publication accepted in the Journal of Translational Neuro.... (inaudible). It's a journal that I had published in before. We went through peer review, the article appeared in print. At the end of July of 2014 and low and behold when the entire whistleblower story broke, and this broke in around August 21, 2014, it took about four days and the Journal took my Paper down from the web site so it was no longer, at first they said

Dr. G: Did they full retract it or did they just don't put it up?

Dr. H: They published a statement, they took the Paper completely down, they published a statement saying the results of this Paper would have a negative effect on public health.

Dr. G: The truth has negative effect on public health and we can't let that happen.

Dr. H: So, we can't let them happen, about 24 hours later they instead changed that and said that I had undisclosed conflict of interests, which was rubbish, which was completely fabricated.

Dr. G: What's your conflict of interest? What monetary gain do you get by publishing this data, but what I'm hearing is they never said that your statistical analysis was wrong.

Dr. H: No.

Dr. G: So they basically were trying to find other ways (inaudible) it went through peer review they said this is properly done (Dr. H: Right) so they're looking for different angle to try to discredit the Paper.

Dr. H: Ultimately the Paper was put I like to call it on time out, because you know kids get time out and have to go sit in the time out chair, so my Paper was put in time out for about six weeks and during those six weeks I argued back and forth with the Journal regarding why it should be published, why my science was sound. They sent me back a paragraph description from one of their editors saying that my science was unacceptable. I rebutted that paragraph, they never sent a response to that and then on October 3rd, they completely retracted the Paper.

Dr. G: And of course no coincidence that when the whistleblower story comes out there's no (inaudible) profile of that, that's when your Paper gets retracted.

Dr. H: That's when my Paper gets retracted.

Dr. G: .... because your science was fine when they published it. How do you control the outrage and how do you not let it eat you up inside, it's really almost unthinkable?

Dr. H: It is very...very, very difficult to respond to be able to let things like that go and it was difficult, it was a difficult step for me to forgive Thompson, I mean in the first place. I mean I felt like he alone, by sitting on this as long as he did is culpable for a large amount of damage to society. There are a lot of families who have been shattered and I really did have to let it go and my wife, Marsha, was instrumental in you know what you need to let this thing whole thing go and getting my Paper retracted, I never got detention in school, I never had anything big like that happen, I've never had a Paper retracted and so having that was a real psychological blow to me and I just had to let it go but the silver lining was I was contacted by several scientists that said look we know what you've gone through, we want you to republish that data because that data needs to be in the public domain and they've provided an opportunity, this whole Paper will be republished, actually in a much more expanded form and laying out the logic of why my results are correct and why the Paper should never have been retracted in the first place and it's coming out in a book I believe in the Fall of 2017 that's published by Elsevier Scientific, one of the very reputable publishing companies (Dr. G: I know who they are, sure.) and I've had my day in the public domain, I will have my day in the public domain and I count myself worthy of some of the scars that were endured by great people like Andy Wakefield.

Dr. G: In your conversations with Dr. Thompson the autism issue wasn't the only issue that came out, there's an issue with mercury and tics …

Dr. H: It's very interesting when you go to CDC's website and they have a specific website on thimerosal what they report is that there is no incidence of harm and that there is no harm caused by thimerosal except for occasional redness and swelling at the injection site . Nothing could be further from the truth and we don't have to go to independent literature to find that out. We go to CDC's literature. Thompson wrote a study that was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2007 and he looked at neurotypical kids, these are kids with no developmental delays, no malities, their ages were somewhere between 6 and 10 I believe and what they did is that they split the group into a high exposure group that had thimerosal vaccines and a low exposure group that had a lesser amount of thimerosal and they looked at all of these different psychological and neurological battery tests and what they found was a very, very profound difference in the number of boys that had tics in the high thimerosal group versus the numbers of boys that had tics in the low thimerosal group. ...It was statistically significant the relative risk was above 2.0 which means that it would argue in a court of law, so boys that were receiving the lion's share of thimerosal in their vaccines were at least twice as likely to have tics and show tics ... evaluated by an independent professional ...this isn't just due to parental reporting but an independent professional who’s trained to see these types of issues was observing these children over a three hour period and those that exhibited tics again the high thimerosal group had a lot more tics in boys than the low thimerosal group. The study that they didn't do they didn't have enough thimerosal control, so you could imagine if you had a control that wasn't exposed to mercury at all that the difference would probably be significant....Not only, the Thompson study came out in 2007 but the Verstraeten study that the CDC used to bury the connection between vaccines and autism had a corollary... and it basically said that in one of the ... tested they showed a strong relationship, statistically significant again, between thimerosal exposure and tics.

The CDC had a hand in a UK study they were actually ultimately responsible for the funding decision for the UK study where they came out in 2004 that also showed a relationship again between thimerosal and tics and this time they looked at boys and girls together, they didn't separate them out but it was statistically significant. Add on to that another study that Thompson did, he was extremely emphatic that thimerosal was causing tics especially in boys and so he did another study in 2012 that was published with a graduate student by the name of Jack Bareil ... and again a strong statistically significant relationship between thimerosal and tics in boys.

In what he described was this systematic watering down of any result that he had if there was a statistical significance. ... He described it to me on the phone and he also shared documentation where there were memos written about his paper specifically on why he should not publish the result on thimerosal and tics. A chief CDC official, his name was Ed Travatan who was in the National Immunization program basically came down hard on Thompson and said you will not publish this result unless you can have a tic expert verify the result and basically what Dr. Travatan was trying to do was trying to dissuade Thompson from publishing the results in the first place. He wanted it in the background, he wanted it to never see the light of day.

Dr. G: And if you're called upon you have the documentation to support what you're asserting…

Dr. H: Oh, absolutely, yea I have the documentation, I also have Dr. Tonya Popavic who used to be the Associate Director for Science for the entire CDC. She was like one of the number two in the second tier but directly below the CDC director who said that what Thompson had to do was empathize the non statically significant relationship, those things that showed that thimerosal wasn't in the clear and downplay those few relationships that showed that thimerosal was causing harm.

Dr. G: So top level officials at the CDC directed him to downplay the relationship that he was observing in his research?

Dr. H: That is correct and it was so transparent that Dr. Thompson with his 2012 paper he went to the Journal of the American Medical Association and tried to get it published there ... The reception that he got from the peer reviewers was laughable. They basically said when CDC tries...sees a relationship that they don't like they try to downplay it, they try to do everything in their power basically to convince the public that this isn't a true statistically significant relationship even though it is.

Dr. G: So the peer reviewers saw that the paper was attempting to water it down and they basically said we're not buying it.

Dr. H: They're not publishing it, so they had to go to a second tier journal in order to get that research published. The Journal of the American Medical Association basically called foul on the CDC .

Dr. G: Now in your recorded conversation with Dr. Thompson do you talk about this mercury issue in tics and does he talk about what happened?

Dr. H: Not only do we talk about the relationship between mercury and tics but he also wanted me to launch a campaign basically suing CDC science against them showing, hey there are four publications that have CDC direct ties that shows that mercury causes tics in boys, why is this still in the flu shot.

Dr. G: So if you were to interpret the dynamics of the circumstance, basically this guy is having private conversations with you and he’s saying they're not letting me reveal what I have found in my research. Can you please get that data and get it out to the world? So do you feel that he was having an issue of conscience trying to do the right thing even though he was in an environment that would not permit it?

Dr. H: Absolutely, he wanted the truth to be revealed. He wanted the truth to be revealed about mercury and tics. He wanted the truth to be known about the MMR and autism and the day my paper was published, that MMR paper was published, he said he called me up and he said, you have vindicated me, the results are out. He figuratively breathed a sigh of relief that this thing that he had been hiding for all those years since 2001 was finally brought into the forefront and was actually published, and so it was a crisis of conscience for Dr. Thompson, he tried to alert chief cdc officials about these relationships and he was shut down summarily and instead of anybody, including all the way to the top, the CDC director at the time was Dr. Julie Gerbidin, shut him directly down and instead they made it an issue of his psychological state and said look, he's unstable, HR recommended that he get counseling, that he see a counseling psychologist, and that's traditionally what the CDC does. If someone falls out of line and is not spewing the party line of this CDC, then they become a personnel problem

Dr. G: What does the CDC say as their signature on their emails "Saving Lives, Protecting People." ...that's their moniker, yet there's now documentary evidence that they're doing exactly the opposite of that and then when somebody mentally breaks down, because they have an issue of conscience as a scientist who's charged with finding the truth and can't reveal it, they now think they need counseling.

Dr. H: They need counseling, these are crazy people, so instead of saving lives and protecting people it's saving programs and protecting profits. Exactly, that is what they are trying to do. People need to understand CDC functions as a for profit company. They are taking money, taxpayer dollars, they're buying vaccines, they're distributing those vaccines to the state public health department and then they are getting reimbursed for that distribution. If vaccine rates fall off, CDC loses money.

Part 4, Dr. Brian Hooker

Dr. G: So, Dr. Hooker, you're a research scientist, your Ph.D. is in biochemical engineering and you know something about toxicity especially because a lot of your career was spent cleaning up the environment from toxins. What can you say to us about Gardasil and what's in Gardasil and what you think of that particular vaccine?

Dr. H: The Gardasil vaccine is loaded with aluminum, upwards to 750 micrograms of aluminum per shot, okay, and they're giving the Gardasil vaccine down to girls and boys of 9 years of age...nine years old, there are some pediatricians, some physicians are giving it as early as 9 years of age. Aside from the fact that Gardasil was never really tested on that population, aluminum does not belong in human body. It just doesn't, there is no purpose for it, it has been tied to aminoplex (spelling?) in the brain, it is increases risks of neurological difficulties, the immune system doesn't know what to do with the aluminum atom, and so what we're doing is through a series of shots we're introducing not micrograms but milligrams of this toxic substance into girls and boys. It's incidents and we're seeing that Gardasil is having the highest amount of adverse reactions reported of any other vaccine that's on the market. It is truly a dirty vaccine. Now if you look at the number of reports of adverse events of Gardasil it is similar to the number of reports of adverse events to the birth control pill Yaz. Yaz was on the market several years ago and there were over 13,000 reports of adverse events from Yaz and so the FDA made the decision to pull Yaz out of the market, okay. Gardasil has been on the market since 2007 and it's far eclipse adverse event reporting that was made in conjunction with the Yaz but yet instead of pulling Gardasil out of off the market, or trying to do rational testing or trying to change the formulation to eliminate aluminum exposure, instead what they're doing is now they're looking at trials to give Gardasil at birth, so instead of giving Gardasil to a 9, 10, 11 year old child, they're giving it to, they want to ultimately give Gardasil to an infant.

Dr. G: So, let me get this straight, it has the highest reporting of adverse reactions events of any vaccine,

Dr. H: that is correct.

Dr. G: and the reaction to that is not only keep it on the market, but to now give it to infants instead, or in addition.

Dr. H: In addition to give it to infants. In the public health community a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, and so if they can get that baby at a well baby visit then they feel like they're going to have better vaccine compliance if they can pop that into an infant rather than trying to coax an adolescent and their families to come to a physician, so that's why they're doing it.

Dr. G: Why do they put aluminum in them in these vaccines, what's the purpose of it from a say if you're a vaccine advocate here's why we put aluminum in them?

Dr. H: Aluminum in the formulation in vaccines basically stimulates a non specific immune response. So if you add it, it's called an adjuvant and when you add an adjuvant to vaccines that dramatically magnifies the immune response that the antigen, the HPV virus particle that's in that vaccine that drastically increases the response and it basically tricks the immune system into thinking that it has a bigger problem than it actually has. The problem with that is when you trick the immune system in that you get a prolonged immune response and you get an immune response that's improper for the human body. Not only does Gardasil when you have the quadrivalent Gardasil that has four different types of the human papa...virus and then you have the 9 valent vaccine that has 9 different types, not only is that completely unnatural in the way that the human immune system responds, we just don't, in nature we don't inject antigens directly into our body, 4 at a time, 9 at a time, that's completely improper, that's not how the immune system works but now we add an adjuvant like aluminum, that dramatically magnifies the response so the response is prolonged, the response is much more severe so you start to see auto immune immunity in the men and women that are getting this vaccine.

Dr. G: Wow, and if they have the adjuvant does that mean they could reduce the amount of antigen and save some money?

Dr. H: If they have the adjuvant literally there is another adjuvant that's used in vaccines called squalene and the term for squalene inside the CDC is Hamburger Helper because it can extend it. You can take a small amount of antigen and you can add adjuvant to it and it will magnify the response so that so you can save money, you hit the nail on the head, you can save money by adding that aluminum which is completely toxic to human physiology.

Japanese children have developmental delays 2x higher than the US. Korean children have autism and developmental delays 2-3x higher. According to the Autism Speaks of Philippines, at least 1 million, or 1 out of 33 children in the Philippines had been diagnosed with autism in 2014 (more without healthcare are likely to have symptoms), which is far worse than our current 1 out of 68 children. I was crushed. I was Angry. I was Outraged.

HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE NOW INVESTIGATING CDC WHISTLEBLOWER DR. WILLIAM THOMPSON

"Just about a year ago I came to Washington, D.C. for the first time and went into politician's offices, including Jason Chaffetz among others, and would ask the question, "Are you aware of Dr. William Thompson the CDC whistleblower?"...just a blank stare..."I have no idea what you're talking about." Really? Really? You do realize a year and a half ago one of our top scientists of our most important health agency in our nation came forward and said they are committing scientific fraud. You're not aware of that? "Never heard of it?" Yesterday I was in D.C. – my third trip now – and every office I went to, including those who are diametrically opposed to our truth, I asked the question, "Are you aware of Dr. William Thompson the CDC Whistleblower?" And every single one of them said, "Yes I am." In fact, they made a great statement which was usually "I know someone on the OGR committee, which is the Oversight Committee of Government Reform, and they have briefed me on this situation. Which means the Oversight Committee of Government Reform is officially investigating Dr. William Thompson."

Seneff: “This series is now available to watch for free. I have watched most of it and in my opinion it is outstanding. Thank you, Ty, for your great efforts to get the message out about the damage vaccines are doing to our nation's children (and adults!)”

The Truth About Vaccines 7 day event goes LIVE April 12th!

Totally Free to watch ~ 60 experts will expose the raw truth about vaccines. Sign up now ~ This is a life-changing, breathtaking mini-series you will not want miss!.

The Truth About Vaccines airs for free starting on April 12th at 9:00PM Eastern. Register NOW to get exclusive access to this life saving documentary.

Those belligerent parrots need to be schooled. Also ask them why the doctors that are 70-years-old now, somehow missed the helmet-wearing, incontinent, self-battering, introverts with severe diarrhea in their practices. Such an insult to doctors who have been in practice longer than 30 years.”

Measles Vaccine Scandal: World Governments Have Known It Can Cause Neurological Disorders Since 1970’s

This document, along with many others that have been uncovered, suggests that the measles vaccine was proving to be problematic from as far back as 1972, and has been associated with neurological adverse outcomes for many years.

If this was the end of the matter, then it would be easy to assume that these problems had been overcome. However, the problem of vaccine-induced SSPE continued to persist even when the measles vaccination was combined with the mumps and the rubella vaccination to form the MMR triple vaccine.

Are Toxic Chemicals Turning Boys Into Girls? (Remember Tyrone Hayes’ Atrazine research on the desexing of frogs?)

Synthetic chemicals can create these silent switches in Nature’s plan. EDCs we encounter every day can alter the sex hormone balance, preventing male genitals from growing properly. By suppressing testosterone or by enhancing or mimicking the female sex hormone, estrogen, they can undermine the natural testosterone messages surging through a growing fetus.

Seneff: “Wow! Long new article on the role of acetaminophen in autism. I had published a paper some time ago together with colleagues implicating acetaminophen to curb the fever in the link between MMR and autism. Very significant that CYP enzymes are needed to detox acetaminophen, and glyphosate (Roundup) suppresses CYP enzyme activity in the liver. Acetaminophen is likely synergistically toxic with the glutamate and antigen in the vaccine and with glyphosate (in the vaccine or in the food).”

The role of oxidative stress, inflammation and acetaminophen exposure from birth to early childhood in the induction of autism

Marcella Piper-Terry: “This is a BRILLIANT and very well researched (and cited) presentation, from a Medical Doctor (M.D.). Dr. Eggertsen is a Family Practice physician who had the guts and ethics to actually look at the science of vaccination. Dr. Eggertsen was a pro-vaccine doctor who once berated a mother for questioning the safety of the MMR vaccine. After Dr. Eggertsen disparaged Dr. Andrew Wakefield, that mother corrected him, letting him know that he was not only wrong, but that "Dr. Wakefield is a hero." To his great credit, Dr. Eggertsen found himself pondering the dichotomy between what he had been "taught" and what he was hearing from the parents of his patients. This is a quote from Dr. Eggertsen: "I realized I should not have been parroting the condemnation of Andrew Wakefield without having looked at the details myself."

This presentation is the result of Dr. Eggertsen's own trip down the rabbit-hole of the real science and what it ACTUALLY SAYS about vaccines and vaccine safety. Definitely worth the time, and worth sharing with your legislators, physicians, nurses, friends, and family. Thank-you, Dr. Eggertsen.”

Why do parents refuse to vaccinate their children?

“Looking at the evidence, I must now agree with my patient, that Andrew Wakefield is not a fraud, and if I ever meet Dr. Wakefield I will give him my apology.”

Sometime next year, Harvard professors David Keith and Frank Keutsch hope to launch a high-altitude balloon, tethered to a gondola equipped with propellers and sensors, from a site in Tucson, Arizona. After initial engineering tests, the “StratoCruiser” would spray a fine mist of materials such as sulfur dioxide, alumina, or calcium carbonate into the stratosphere. The sensors would then measure the reflectivity of the particles, the degree to which they disperse or coalesce, and the way they interact with other compounds in the atmosphere.

"This is the most powerful, clear, and easy to read book exposing the truth about vaccines I have ever read. Vaccine Illusion is the perfect resource for anyone interested getting to the heart of the matter and protecting their health freedom." - Sayer Ji, Founder of GreenMedInfo.com, Co-founder of Alliance for Vaccine Awareness

American Academy of Pediatrics Refuses to Back Vaccine Claims with Science

When confronted with the observation that none of the studies provided supported the AAP’s claim that vaccines can prevent cancer, she repeated that the AAP was not going to provide any additional information.

When asked whether the authors of the press release, AAP President Fernando Stein and Executive Vice President Karen Remley, would like to comment, Ms. Black abruptly ended the phone call by saying she was going to hang up and then doing so.