Setting the Stage: US Representative to the UN Nikki Haley Pre-Emptively Blames Assad for Chemical Attack Before It Happens – Prepare for False Flag Attack

The above image comes from the Twitter account of United States Representative to the United Nations Nikki Haley whose tweet sends a clear message to terrorist groups operating in alliance with the FSA and White Helmets in Syria to go ahead and conduct a false flag chemical weapons attack.

The war in Syria is being lost by the western globalists and their vassals in world governments, and thus, they are at the end of their rope and are attempting to create further chaos that they will blame on Syria, Russia and Iran. The false flags have become obvious but the Empire keeps moving towards full out global war in order to maintain hegemony. For the sake of their own sons and daughters, who may be sent to save and die in a large scale war based upon lies, the American people must wake up to the crimes that their government is orchestrating. Now is the time to take drastic action, as false flags and support for terrorists can only backfire on the American people and one day be used against them. Please wake up to this terrible reality and help wake up others.

Online reactions point out the obvious agenda being implemented…..

This new ‘yet-to-occur’ chemical attack announcement follows the highly revealing Sy Hersh attained discussion between a US soldier and analyst that reveals the April 4th, 2017 Idlib chemical weapons event was also a false flag.

Things are happening quite fast now and the Empire appears to be running out of time before their overthrow plans for Syria and Iran fall apart. They are getting quite desperate, no doubt.

Link to an excellent 2 part post on Sy Hersh’s ascertained leaked chat between a US service member and an analyst:

The White House claims that the Syrian government is preparing “chemical weapon attacks”. This is clearly not the case. Syria is winning the war against the country. Any such attack would clearly be to its disadvantage. The White House announcement must thereby be understood as preparation for another U.S. attack on Syria in “retaliation” for an upcoming staged “chemical weapon attack” which will be blamed on the Syrian government.

In August 2013 Syria invited inspectors of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to investigate chemical weapons attacks on the Syrian army. As soon as the inspectors arrived in Damascus a “chemical attack” was staged in Ghouta near Damascus. Lots of Jihadist video coverage of killed children was published and the “western” media blamed the incident on the Syrian government. It never explained why targeting a militarily irrelevant area with chemical weapons at the same time as inspectors arrived would have been a rational decision for a Syrian government that was just regaining control and international standing.

The “attack” was clearly staged by the opposition of the Syrian government and its foreign supporters. The Obama administration had planned to use it to launch U.S. attacks on the Syrian government but refrained from this when Russia arranged to remove Syria’s strategic chemical weapons, aimed at Israel, instead.

In early 2017 the new U.S. president Trump made positive comments about the Syrian government. Assad can stay, he said. The Syrian military and its allies had gained the upper hand and were victorious on all fronts. Two days later another “chemical attack” was staged in the al-Qaeda held town of Khan Sheikhun. Lots of Jihadi video coverage of killed children, likely prepared in advance, was spilled onto the “western” public. U.S. intelligence knew that no chemical attack by the Syrian government had taken place. But the Trump administration used the incident to launch a volley of cruise missiles against a Syrian military airport. The neoconservatives were delighted. They finally had Trump where they wanted him. The media coverage changed from damming Trump for his alleged “Russian connections” to lauding his decisiveness in response to the faked attack.

On Tuesday, Pentagon spokesman Capt Jeff Davis said activity had been spotted at the Syrian army’s Shayrat airfield, from where the US says jets departed before the Khan Sheikhoun incident.

“This involved specific aircraft in a specific hangar, both of which we know to be associated with chemical weapons use,” Capt Davis said. In a statement on Monday, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said the US had “identified potential preparations for another chemical weapons attack by the Assad regime that would likely result in the mass murder of civilians, including innocent children”.

He added that if “Mr Assad conducts another mass murder attack using chemical weapons, he and his military will pay a heavy price”. The White House provided no supporting evidence or further explanation.

US media had reported that the state department and Pentagon were caught off-guard by the statement, suggesting they were not consulted in advance, but the White House later said all “were involved in the process from the beginning”. The US permanent representative to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, also warned Russia and Iran – Mr Assad’s allies. “Any further attacks done to the people of Syria will be blamed on Assad, but also on Russia & Iran who support him killing his own people,” she tweeted.

On June 25, veteran journalist Seymour Hersh released a bombshell article revealing a number of facets regarding the alleged chemical attack in Khan Sheikhoun, Syria and the resulting volley of Tomahawk missiles fired by the United States at the al-Sha’aryat airbase in response. Hersh’s article provides the reader with what many of us already knew and wrote about at the time; i.e. that the Syrian military did not conduct a chemical weapons attack and that the United States was fully aware of that fact. Still, the U.S. government opted to use the attack as a justification for launching 59 Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian airbase that resulted in the deaths of Syrian soldiers, civilians, and children from the nearby village.

Hersh’s article shows that not all key personnel were on board with the decision to launch Tomahawk missiles at al-Sha’aryat or even of the whole Syria/Iraq mission. The article reveals real concerns amongst knowledgeable personnel that the Russians will not continue to act as the cooler heads and that Russia has long wanted peace in the region. Most notably, it reveals the fact that there is a “secret agenda” moving forward in regards to Syria, Iraq, and Russia. Hersh’s article also points to the President as the individual who made the decision to launch attacks in Syria, against the advice of the military and intelligence community.

Tyranny Unmasked video covers the newly announced chemical attack….

Link to Clarity of Signal posts that expose the western government’s orchestrated false flags in Syria along with their proxy White Helmets terrorists…..