On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:42:48PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
>> > Patch was(and still is, I think) against linuxppc_2_4_devel. Don't
> > know your tree, is it not the same as linuxppc? Anyhow, too much time
> > has passed for me to remember all details and I don't have the time to
> > go back and do it all over again. I suggest you take the linuxppc
> > version, patch it and adopt it to your tree.
>> Why the hell are there two different trees? :'( Can't we work all
> together for a better result?
Because the linuxppc tree doesn't track the whole i2c tree, as that would
be quite silly. :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/