Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> Basically "editable" on the Web is a slippery concept, and in a real
> sense everything can be considered editable.
No argument from me about that. I'm just noting -- largely for my own
benefit and that of my colleagues here -- that this is something that
might not be intuitive to font makers, who are used to interpreting the
OT embedding bits in terms of less, um, slippery document types.
JH