Center for World Conflict and Peace

Friday, March 10, 2017

Reports on the connections between Trump/the people in his
orbit and Russia continue to dog the White House. This is hardly a surprise,
given that he’s made little attempt to publicly, exhaustively clarify his
relationship with Russia; instead, he’s opted to dismiss reports as a “witch
hunt.” But is it?

President Trump has traveled extensively to Russia, at a
minimum, for his beauty pageants. In the past, he’s bragged about meeting and
having a good relationship to Russian President Vladimir Putin, something he
now denies. Trump’s sons have stated that the Russian market is vital to the
growth of the Trump organization, even going so far as to say that “money is pouring
in from Russia.” And, as we know, the 800-pound gorilla in the room is his
unprovoked and consistently flattering, obsequious remarks about Russia and Putin; Trump’s been
more than willing to defend Russia, even if that means he has to criticize and
demonize past US presidents, the US media, America’s intelligence community and
military, including its generals, in the process. Moreover, some of Trump's stated foreign policy positions--such as his willingness to hand the Middle East to Russia, his tepid support for NATO, his disinterest in Russia's annexation of Crimea, and his inclination to water down if not weaken US sanctions on Moscow--buck longstanding US strategy and are right in line with Russian interests. Indeed, if there’s
one consistency in Trump’s chaotic presidency, it’s his blatant Russophilia.

But the smoke surrounding Trump isn’t simply limited to him;
it also hovers over a number of Trump consiglieres. Jared Kushner, Michael Flynn,
Carter Page, Paul Manafort, JD Gordon, Jeff Sessions, Roger Stone, and Michael Cohen,
among others, have been identified as communicating with a host of Russian figures--including the Russian ambassador to the US, Sergey Kiselyak, close associates of Putin, Russian intelligence officers, and even Russian hackers--prior to Trump taking office this January. Even Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who, so far, hasn’t been pinpointed in
any nefarious activities with Russia, has deep, friendly ties to Russia as
former CEO of ExxonMobil. Indeed, in 2013, Tillerson was awarded the Order of
Freedom—Russia’s highest honor for a foreign citizen--personally by Putin.

The links between folks on each side of the Washington-Moscow axis are said to possibly involve such things as business affairs, banking ties, diplomatic
discussions, and, of course, the 2016 presidential election. At bottom, then,
the manifold linkages and communications binding both sides together seem quite diverse and extensive.

Certainly, all of this begs a host of questions.
Most notably, why do so many of Trump advisers, cabinet members, and surrogates
have connections to Russia? Why have they repeatedly lied about or hid their
ties to Russia? Why is Trump ostensibly a sycophant for Russia and its president?
In short, what the heck is going on here?

Benign Events

Maybe the contacts and meetings with Russian figures were
mostly innocent. For instance, it’s plausible that they were part of the normal
prep for a future Trump administration. After all, that is what incoming
administrations do with foreign nations and their diplomats: develop contacts, hold
discussions, and get a feel of all of the involved parties. It’s also plausible
that the Trump administration’s coziness with Russia is part of a larger strategic
plan to woo Moscow for America’s interests. By developing good relations with
Russia, so goes the logic, the US might be able to delegate the Syria problem
to Moscow, gain a powerful anti-terrorism partner, and seduce a vital state to
balance against a continued rising/aggressive China. If either or both are
true, I can see how Team Trump could believe it has a political incentive
to downplay, perhaps even mislead or lie, about its interactions and
engagements with Russia, given the US domestic climate surrounding the Russian hacks
and attempts to hijack the election. But if so, it’s gamble the team has made, and probably not a good one. For they’ve now manufactured a bad situation—a cover-up and
resultant investigations and a dubious American public—to paper over
eye-raising but mostly legal actions and maneuvers. Trump would have been far, far better off simply releasing his taxes and comprehensively detailing and explaining his and his team's relationship to Russia.

Nefarious Schemes

But maybe Trump and his staff aren’t so innocent. Perhaps
all the smoke surrounding the Trump administration is evidence of a truly
5-five alarm fire brewing inside the White House. The big fear among many Americans
is that Trump and his staff are deliberately concealing and prevaricating about their
interactions with Russia because they have something to hide—that they or Trump
himself have done something illegal or something that would provoke widespread
outrage in the US.

Yes, the major worry is that they’ve colluded with Russia to
damage Hillary Clinton and boost Trump’s chances at winning the presidential election.
In other words, Trump is a real life Manchurian Candidate, a foreign stooge
swept into power by Moscow, ready and willing to do its bidding. This a
conspiratorial view of Trump, to be sure, yet not particularly far-fetched, alas. Given what I’ve already written above about Trump and his staff, plus his
public calls during the campaign season exhorting Russia and Wikileaks to damage the Clinton machine, all
added on top of his narcissistic personality quirks, a treasonous act is something that just shouldn’t be dismissed.

But even if Trump’s not quite a foreign stooge, not entirely
willing to embrace and implement Russian-favored policies and worldviews,
there’s still the grave concern about his role in subverting America’s democracy. We
already know that the election wasn’t exactly free and fair, given the
Russia-Wikileaks collaboration, and that Clinton was likely, though not
definitively, cheated out of winning the presidency. That in itself has
tarnished the veneer of American democracy: we have to face the fact that foreign powers can manipulate
and distort US elections. But if Trump directly or indirectly played a role in
stealing the win, that’s something completely different. It’s an internal
subversion of the main prized American democratic institution. And if this is the case, how can Americans
trust that future candidates won’t act and behave similarly to Trump, willing to ignore
and flout US norms and rules and laws? And if they can’t, the very fabric of
democracy would be in jeopardy.

Another concern is that Trump has been compromised by
Russian intelligence—whether because Trump has business interests and ties to
shady Russian kleptocrats and mobsters, his purported lascivious activities, or something altogether different.
Here, the logic, as you’d expect, is that Trump has placed himself in a
position in which he has to cater to Putin’s policy interests and goals or risk
being publicly exposed by a vengeful, savvy Putin. There’s long been
unsubstantiated whispers about Trump’s willingness to do business with anyone
or anything, no matter if laws are flouted or corruption is the coin of the
game—and the recent reports of his business dealings with Azerbaijan, which may
also involve Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, only adds credibility to the
perception that Trump is more than willing to traffic in murky, dirty waters.
Moreover, the 35 page “dossier,” compiled by a former British intelligence officer,
outlining Trump’s nighttime activities with Russian prostitutes, has breathed even more life into the idea that Russian officials have substantial Kompromat on him.

If any of this is true, it would be a scandal of epic,
unprecedented proportions in US political history. It would make former
disgraced US President Richard Nixon seem merely paranoid and inept, hardly a big-time
criminal. After all, Nixon’s misdeeds were a bungled attempt to glean
information about the Democrats heading into the 1972 presidential election, an
election that Nixon won overwhelmingly: he won the popular vote by roughly 18
million and won the electoral vote of 49 of 50 states. In the case of Trump,
however, if he and his crew really collaborated with the Russians to win the
election—a narrow win, mind you—he aided and abetted a foreign enemy power
to breach and subvert the sovereignty of the US. He would be a traitor, subject
to all the laws and punishments specified by the American Constitution.

What's Next?

Right now, the easy thing to say is that we need a blue
ribbon independent commission to investigate the election, Trump and his cabal,
and the Russian hack. Yes, this type of investigation would be wonderful, as it
would be a marked improvement over the current Congressional investigations
dominated by the Trump-led GOP. But don’t hold your breath on that happening
anytime soon.

Why? Well, keep the following things in mind. First, about
30-35 percent of voting Americans are solidly with Trump, with a smaller base of
hardcore supporters willing to ride with Trump until the end. Congressional Republicans, especially those in red states, know this, which makes them hesitant
to move strongly against Trump. Second, power dynamics
are on Trump’s side. Look, the GOP dominates the House and Senate, which insulates
Trump from the type of scrutiny he’d face if he was a Democratic president. Third,
Barack Obama has been called the first social media president, but that’s not
really true. Donald trump is, and he wields his Twitter and Facebook accounts to his
advantage: he has already successfully created his own powerful political narrative,
free of filters, which he propagates to millions of people (26+ million on Twitter, 21+ million on Facebook). He paints himself
as the champion of the “little guy/gal,” an unfair victim of the “liberal media” and the "deep state," a
can-do president with a mandate for real, substantial change, unlike the usual “all-talk”
politician. But beyond this, social media have enabled Trump to form a personal
connection to his followers, tightening his bond with them, which is an
extremely useful political tool for Trump. Fourth, Trump employs an army of
public relations folks, like Sean Spicer, Kellyanne Conway, Sarah Huckabee Sanders,
who hold press conferences and make television appearances to spin Trump’s
tweets and public statements for popular consumption. Fifth, Trump is aided by
conservative and alt-right echo chambers that includes Fox News, Breitbart, and
Infowars, among others. These outlets shout and scream Trump’s narrative (as
put forth by Trump himself and spun by his PR professionals), entrenching it, allowing
Trump’s base to wallow in their love for all things Trump and to share in their
dislike for Trump’s domestic opponents.

So what we have, then, is a neat, tight feedback loop
connecting Trump, his staff, Congressional GOPers, the various Trump media arms,
and Trump’s base. All parts of this loop are highly motivated,
ready to defend Trump and push back against any and all criminal and salacious allegations,
obstructing the search for truth. So should we despair that illegal acts by Team Trump might go overlooked? Not exactly.

Overall, it's a good thing that liberal activists are mobilized, organizing themselves, taking to the streets, and calling their Representatives and Senators--all in the name of truth and justice. It might not seem like much, but Trump, an incessant cable tv-watcher, is aware of these happenings. In fact, they've likely added to the panic that rogue White House staffers report on social media. Liberals need to continue to demand the truth, preparing themselves for a protracted struggle, but do so using only civil, non-violent means. It may seem obvious, but it needs to be said that violence only delegitimizes liberals and their causes and shifts the national discussion from the serious questions about the Trump administration to the extremism of anti-Trump activists. I also recommend that liberal activists begin the process of building formal bridges to independents and moderate/centrist Republicans, so as to ensure that getting to the bottom of #Russiagate isn't strictly a partisan endeavor.

Additionally, we need journalists
to continue to do the deep-digging research and reporting on the Trump and Russia
affair. Perhaps these efforts, if more unsavory details are uncovered, will put
enough pressure on Trump’s base, especially those who sit outside the hardcore
supporters, to recognize that maybe Trump isn’t who they thought he was, which
would give some GOPers the green light to move on Trump, if necessary. Or perhaps
new information would give Republicans the requisite ammunition to convince a
sizable chunk of Trump’s base that more stringent moves against Trump are the
right thing to do.