15 days after the verdict was read into the records books by Honorable Judge Belvin Perry Jr, many stories still string up issues regarding the jurors verdict and how justice was not carried out. I find this article the one that will always offer a valid reason why the death penalty itself is not the correct answer, when the incorrect answer given by an expert witness, is invalid.

Cheney Mason, one of Ms. Anthony’s defense lawyers, said it was “outrageous” that prosecutors withheld critical information on the “chloroform” searches.

“The prosecution is absolutely obligated to bring forth to the court any and all evidence that could be exculpatory,” Mr. Mason said. “If in fact this is true, and the prosecution concealed this new information, it is more than shame on them. It is outrageous.”

The correct information is below-

Hits? Sci-Spot 1 MySpace 84 !

How can this mistake happen, and how can the Judge allow this not to be clarifies in the Closing statements by Jeff Ashton?