Guess what , pal , I asked myself the same question and was about to ask it here , yet , you were first

I tracked his posts ( not because I generally like to "put an eye on people" , just because I wondered about his banning ) and I ask myself what went wrong . .

Sad thing is , once your account on a forum has been disabled forever you will never be able to come back / post under that name again ( oh , I know some people try to re-register under different names , may one think about that what one wants . . .)

use a fake name here at VNN, you got absolute fucking kelvin zero leeway if you want to start troublemaking too. and if i guess wrongn about a solid, too bad, that's the point: i'm not wasting time guessing about your motives

if you're into science fition, that already proves you're a fag, any many fags are also pedos.

no joke - vox day has written quite a bit about this: sci-fi writers and that community are hugely overlapped with pedophiles

you want to sit here and make trouble between people. good luck. if i see it, i'll ban you.

disaagree, state your opinion, that's fine. if you want to go into every thread and post stupid pics, or embaraasing pics of people in movement you dont like, fuck you.

there are too many losers out there, they can stay away

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

use a fake name here at VNN, you got absolute fucking kelvin zero leeway if you want to start troublemaking too. and if i guess wrongn about a solid, too bad, that's the point: i'm not wasting time guessing about your motives

if you're into science fition, that already proves you're a fag, any many fags are also pedos.

no joke - vox day has written quite a bit about this: sci-fi writers and that community are hugely overlapped with pedophiles

Frustrated ?

Well , if so , I can understand.

Most internet forums today are swirling with trolls.

And that in a supposed age where private sphere online practically equals zero and the NSA can look over your shoulders ( especially in social networks . .)

you want to sit here and make trouble between people. good luck. if i see it, i'll ban you.

disaagree, state your opinion, that's fine. if you want to go into every thread and post stupid pics, or embaraasing pics of people in movement you dont like, fuck you.

there are too many losers out there, they can stay away

I see. Thank you for taking the time to reply to my OP, Alex.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

if you're into science fition, that already proves you're a fag, any many fags are also pedos.

no joke - vox day has written quite a bit about this: sci-fi writers and that community are hugely overlapped with pedophiles

I've never heard this bizarre claim before. I'm a huge science fiction fan; Star Wars and Star Trek – and also Marvel comics and anime – have always been an extremely important part of my life, and I'm neither a homosexual nor a pedophile. But I respect your opinion.

He had a certain creative posting style ( don't really know what would make him a troublemaker , yet I'll take Alex' word )

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows

I've never heard this bizarre claim before. I'm a huge science fiction fan; Star Wars and Star Trek – and also Marvel comics and anime – have always been an extremely important part of my life, and I'm neither a homosexual nor a pedophile. But I respect your opinion.

Don't worry . .

I never took you for one .

Though I remember you once admitting to having liked 'homo music' in your youth . .

He made some quite rude references to the whole Parrott/Heimbach situation whilst being anonymous himself.

We operate by a code here that is basically: if you're anonymous, which is fine, you are expected to be doubly honest with matters regarding public figures such as Parrott and Heimbach for instance.

Snide shit about the "Heimbach-maneuver" and such won't go unpunished here. Especially not at such an early stage of your posting 'career' on here. Not even 100 posts in and still posting shit like that. Why bother?

I'll present an example of how I think it works. Look at Andrew Anglin. To call him a cuck that is sucking Republican dick at this point is fine. But if you say that he's a pedophile or a secret Jew or whatever - that's not acceptable on here.

He made some quite rude references to the whole Parrott/Heimbach situation whilst being anonymous himself.

We operate by a code here that is basically: if you're anonymous, which is fine, you are expected to be doubly honest with matters regarding public figures such as Parrott and Heimbach for instance.

Snide shit about the "Heimbach-maneuver" and such won't go unpunished here. Especially not at such an early stage of your posting 'career' on here. Not even 100 posts in and still posting shit like that. Why bother?

Hmmmm . .

It would appear some people give themselves some liberities online which they in real life they probably would have to cross the Rubicon for . .

I'm not out to cut people of their liberties yet what some people allow themselves online . .

. . which in turn gives NWO agencies such as NSA the 'justification' to watch over us . .

He made some quite rude references to the whole Parrott/Heimbach situation whilst being anonymous himself.

After Linder wrote his reply to me, I went through Kirk's posting history and found the post that you're talking about, and I agree that he crossed the line.

Quote:

We operate by a code here that is basically: if you're anonymous, which is fine, you are expected to be doubly honest with matters regarding public figures such as Parrott and Heimbach for instance.

Let me just say that I'm pretty sure I know who James T Kirk is in real life since I immediately recognized his writing style and behavior. He's a well-known person who has posted here before, as well as on other free speech forums, and who has often attacked and smeared prominent White Nationalists like David Duke, William Pierce and Alex Linder. So yes, he's definitely a troublemaker (although I'm not going to reveal his identity since that would be against the rules).

After Linder wrote his reply to me, I went through Kirk's posting history and found the post that you're talking about, and I agree that he crossed the line.

Think I found it too . .

Since I've already mentioned Russian penalties in post # 7, well , might have been a thing of the Commies , but how 'bout giving him some re-education ?

His choice of words . .boah ! !

Quote:

Let me just say that I'm pretty sure I know who James T Kirk is in real life since I immediately recognized his writing style and behavior. He's a well-known person who has posted here before, as well as on other free speech forums, and who has often attacked and smeared prominent White Nationalists like David Duke, William Pierce and Alex Linder.

Hell of a detective work you did.

Quote:

So yes, he's definitely a troublemaker (although I'm not going to reveal his identity since that would be against the rules).

I've never heard this bizarre claim before. I'm a huge science fiction fan; Star Wars and Star Trek – and also Marvel comics and anime – have always been an extremely important part of my life, and I'm neither a homosexual nor a pedophile. But I respect your opinion.

Yes, I made Robbie Key a moderator. He understands how I think and has self-control. Those are key elements in being a good moderator. Not too much moderation needed but if Gab is truly gone or gelded, I'll be posting here more often.

I've never heard this bizarre claim before. I'm a huge science fiction fan; Star Wars and Star Trek – and also Marvel comics and anime – have always been an extremely important part of my life, and I'm neither a homosexual nor a pedophile. But I respect your opinion.

No offense, but there are good reasons for making the claim. Fans of all people should know that shows like Star Trek and Star Wars shoehorned Cultural Marxism, and Loxism to the masses, and have even brought these ideas some popularity.

And anime? Not a fan. Whenever I think of anime, the first thing that comes to mind are weeaboo manchildren posting under little anime girl avatars all over the internet. Many of them appear to have pedophilic tendencies. You can see this in how they sexualize flat chested anime girls. Nobody in their right mind should view that as healthy.

And Marvel? They've always been a liberal company. Just take a look at what they're doing recently with these super hero queero movies.

For the life of me, I can't understand how someone can claim to hate jewed media, yet are a-ok with it as long as it's done in the form of Science Fiction, or with flashy graphics in movies. Shouldn't we be attacking this garbage?

And I'm not saying this to offend you personally, but that's my opinion.

__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER

well i wasnt aware either, i'm not talking about the usual jew agenda promoted in the top tv series but sci-fi literature. search sci fi and fox day - a lot of the writers historically and today are into kids. he's written a lot about this