Top ten rules in the Quran that oppress and insult women

Islam in its purest form honors and elevates women, so we are told. But does it?

Truthfully, too often textual reality (the Quran) matches up with seventh-century
Arabia. Gender inequality and oppression in the Quran reflect this excessively patriarchal
culture. If Allah and Muhammad improved on this patriarchy, then they did not go far
enough for a worldwide religion that claims universality.

Therefore, the following rules and attitudes should in no way be transferred to
todays world.

But before reading the list, we should prevent a strategy of Muslim polemicists
and missionaries who believe that Islam is the best religion in the world and who
want it to spread around the globe. Sometimes they attempt to refute my top ten lists.
But attempting to refute such a list is like reviewing a long book only from the last
chapter. The reviewer has skipped over the hard work of reading all the preceding chapters.
Likewise, Muslim polemicists must not skip over all of the links under each point or
all of the commentary from a respected and traditional Muslim scholar, Sayyid Abul
Ala Maududi (d. 1979) (The Meaning of the Quran). They must not
take a shortcut, but must instead do the hard work of refuting all of the supporting articles
and Maududi himself. This present "top ten" article is merely a summary
of all of the data found in these back-up articles and Maududis ideas, all of which
are quickly referenced under each point.

Here are the top ten rules in the Quran that oppress and insult women.

10. A husband has sex with his wife, as a plow goes into a dirt field.

We should make no mistake about this verse. It includes sexual positions. In a footnote
to this verse, Haleem says that Muslims in Medina heard from the Jews that "a child
born from a woman approached from behind would have a squint."

The hadith are the reports of Muhammads words and actions outside of the Quran.
Two reliable hadith collectors and editors are Bukhari (d. 870), Muslim (d. 875). After
the Quran, the hadith come second in importance and sacredness among the vast majority
of Muslims around the world.

Since the hadith is explicit, the readers are invited to click here and read for
themselves, at their own discretion: Muslim nos.
3363-3365.

We should have no doubt that the husband controlled their sex life. If a woman does not
want to have sex, then angels curse her.

. . . "If a man invites his wife to sleep with him and she refuses to come to
him, then the angels send their curses on her till morning."
(Bukhari)

Here is the back-up article.
This one also provides back up material.
See the section at the beginning "Women Are Mens Property."

9. Husbands are a degree above their wives.

The Quran in Sura 2:228 says:

. . . Wives have the same rights as the husbands have on them in accordance with the
generally known principles. Of course, men are a degree above them in status . . .
(Sayyid Abul ALa Maududi, The Meaning of the Quran, vol. 1, p. 165)

Gender inequality shows up in a theological context. This hadith shows that the
majority of the inhabitants of hell are women.

The Prophet said, "I looked at Paradise and found poor people forming the majority
of its inhabitants; and I looked at Hell and saw that the majority of its inhabitants
were women."
(Bukhari,
emphasis added; see also these parallel traditions
here
and
here.)

This parallel
hadith explains that the majority of the inhabitants of hell are women because they are
ungrateful and harsh towards their husbands. There is no word about the husbands
ingratitude and harshness. It should be noted that some Muslim missionaries and
polemicists assert that since women make up the majority of the world, it only stands to reason
that they would be the majority in hell. In reply, however, this misses the point—and may
miss the possibility that women may be more spiritual than men. Regardless, the reason
that women make up the majority in hell is their harshness and ingratitude. So it has nothing to
do with a mathematical majority. Islam clearly does not honor women.

Muhammad was also superstitious (see here for the evidence).
This next hadith says that women are part of an evil omen.

I heard the Prophet saying. "Evil omen is in three things: The horse, the woman
and the house."
(Bukhari)

Here is the back-up article.
This one is too (scroll down to the Endnotes
and see the brief discussion about Muslim women in hell).

8. A male gets a double share of the inheritance over that of a female.

The Quran in Sura 4:11 says:

The share of the male shall be twice that of a female . . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 311)

For how this religious law works out in early Islam, see these hadith
here
and here
and here.

Malik (d. 795) is a founder of a major school of law. He composed a law book that is
also considered a collection of reliable hadith: Al-Muwatta of Imam Malik ibn Anas: The
First Formation of Islamic Law (rev. trans. Aisha Bewley, Inverness, Scotland: Madina
Press, 1989, 2001). Malik
writes:

The generally agreed upon way of doing things among us . . . about fixed shares of
inheritance (faraid) of children from the mother or father when one or the
other dies is that if they leave male and female children, the male takes the portion of
two females.

This Islamic law is regressive. But in the US, for example, the inheritance is divided
equally among all siblings, regardless of the gender. No religious law prohibits this from
happening in advance. So American secular law fits into a modern context better, where
women have more economic opportunities and freedom.

This online booklet has a short
explanation on womens inheritance "rights." Click on Chapter 15.

And let two men from among you bear witness to all such documents [contracts of loans
without interest]. But if two men be not available, there should be one man and two women
to bear witness so that if one of the women forgets (anything), the other may remind her.
(Maududi, vol. 1, p. 205).

It seems that the foundational reason for having two women witnesses is that one of
the women may "forget" something. This goes to the nature of womankind.
Philosophers teach us that one of the main differences between animals and humans lies in
humankinds rationality. But this verse implies that a womans mind is weak.

This hadith removes any ambiguity about womens abilities in Sura 2:282:

The Prophet said, "Isnt the witness of a woman equal to half of that of
a man?" The women said, "Yes." He said, "This is because of the
deficiency of a womans mind."
(Bukhari,
emphasis added)

Here is the back-up article, and so is
this one.
This article too explains Islams view
on womens mental inabilities (scroll down to "Women Are Inferior to Men"), citing many hadith
and Muslim commentators.

6. A wife may remarry her ex-husband if and only if she marries another man, they have
sex, and then this second man divorces her.

The Quran in Sura 2:230 says:

And if the husband divorces his wife (for the third time), she shall not remain his
lawful wife after this (absolute) divorce, unless she marries another husband and the
second husband divorces her. (In that case) there is no harm if they [the first couple]
remarry . . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 165)

The finally and absolutely divorced couple is not permitted to remarry each other
unless she marries another man, they have sex, and he divorces her. Sura 2:230 engenders
a divorce on the road to a possible reconciliation. Why should it be necessary to have
the intervening steps of a second marriage and divorce before the first couple can work
out their differences and get back together?

To see this tragedy in real life, go to this
question
and answer at a traditional Muslim fatwa website. Apparently, a Muslim husband pronounced
divorce three times, the divorce is final, and now he regrets his decision made in haste and
anger. The cleric or scholar says that they are allowed to reconcile only if she follows
the Quranic steps of her marrying someone else, consummating that marriage, and then his
divorcing her. However, Islam should allow this original divorced couple to reunite without
the intervening steps or without an analysis of different levels of anger (click on the link).
Let them reconcileperiod.

As for divorce generally,

This article analyzes the ethics behind Quranic
divorce procedures and contrasts them with the New Testament.

This very short article
at a Muslim website shows concern for the divorce rate in Islam.

These links add up to this: Islamic divorce is ambiguous and favors the man.

Here is the back-up article, and
this one replies to a Muslim polemicist.
It analyzes the differences between Christianity and Islam on divorce.

5. Slave-girls are sexual property for their male owners.

The Quran in Sura 4:24 says:

And forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people except those who have fallen
in your hands (as prisoners of war) . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 319).

Sayyid Maududi (d. 1979), a highly respected traditional commentator and scholar,
says in his comment on the verse that is it lawful for Muslim holy warriors to marry women
prisoners of war even when their husbands are still alive. But what happens if the husbands
are captured with their wives? Maududi cites a school of law that says Muslims may not
marry them, but two other schools say that the marriage between the captive husbands
and wives is broken (note 44). But why would a debate over this cruelty emerge in
the first place? No sex or marriage should take place between married female prisoners
of war and their captors. In fact, no sex should take place between women captives and
their Muslim overlords. But Islam traffics in injustice too often.

Islam allows deep immorality with women who are in their most helpless condition.
This crime is reprehensible, but Allah wills it nonethelessthe Quran says so.

For more information on this Quran-inspired immorality, see this
short article.

See also Suras 4:3; 23:5-6; 33:50; 70:22-30, all of which permit male slave-owners to
have sex with their slave-girls. Suras 23:5-6 and 70:22-230 allow men to have sex with
them in the Meccan period, during times of peace before Muhammad initiated his skirmishes
and wars while being based in Medina.

The hadith demonstrate that Muslim jihadists actually have sex with the captured
women, whether or not they are married. In the following hadith passage, Khumus is
one-fifth of the spoils of war.

Moreover, jihadists may not practice coitus interruptus with the women they
capture, but not for the reason that the reader may expect. While on a military campaign
and away from their wives, Muslim jihadists "received captives from among the Arab
captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus
interruptus." They asked the prophet about this, and it is important to note what
he did not say. He did not scold them or prohibit any kind of sex whatsoever. Rather, he
invokes the murky, quirky doctrine of fate:

It is better for you not to do so [practice coitus interruptus]. There is no person
that is destined to exist, but will come to existence, till the Day of Resurrection.
(Bukhari;
also go here
and here)

That is, these enquiring Muslims should stop doing coitus interruptus, but
instead go all the way with the enslaved sex objects. Fate controls who should be born.

It is one thing for some soldiers in any army to strike out on their own and rape
women. All armies have criminal soldiers who commit this wrong act. But it is quite
another to codify rape in a sacred text.

This article quotes the Quran and many
hadith passages on sex with prisoners of war. It also analyzes modern Islamic scholars
on the topic. They support this practice. In Appendix One, the author answers
a Muslim charge that the Old Testament allows this practice. Besides, Jesus
fulfills the Old Testament in the areas of human, economic relations
(and more areas; see the link).

This article
provides further details on Muhammads encouragement to his soldiers to "do
it."

And if you be apprehensive that you will not be able to do justice to the orphans, you
may marry two or three or four women whom you choose. But if you apprehend that you might
not be able to do justice to them, then marry only one wife, or marry those who have
fallen in your possession. (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 305)

The clause "marry those who have fallen in your possession" means slave-girls
who were captured after a war. Men may "marry" them because slaves do not incur
very much expense, not as much as free women do. This means that the limit on four wives
is artificial. Men could have sex with as many slave-girls as they wanted.

Maududi paraphrases the verse: "If you need more than one [wife] but are afraid
that you might not be able to do justice to your wives from among the free people, you may
turn to slave girls because in that case you will be burdened with less
responsibilities" (note 6) (See Sura 4:24).

However, Muhammad would not allow polygamy for his son-in-law Ali, because an extra
wife would hurt Muhammads first daughter Fatima, by his first wife Khadija. Fatima
was married to Ali.

I heard Allahs Apostle who was on the pulpit, saying, "Banu Hisham bin
Al-Mughira have requested me to allow them to marry their daughter to Ali bin Abu Talib,
but I dont give permission, and will not give permission unless Ali bin Abi
Talib divorces my daughter in order to marry their daughter, because Fatima is a part of
my body, and I hate what she hates to see, and what hurts her, hurts me."
(Bukhari)

Despite the fact that Muhammad is very much aware that polygamy is hurtful and
insulting to women, he still practices it himself and allows it for his followers in
general.

Muhammads "special" marriage privileges

Moreover, it seems that Allah gave Muhammad special permission to marry as many women
as he desired or take them as slaves or concubines, just as in the pre-Islamic days of
"ignorance."

The Quran in Sura 33:50, a lengthy verse, grants Muhammad wide latitude in his marriages:

O Prophet, We have made lawful to you those of your wives, whose dowers you have paid,
and those women who come into your possession out of the slave-girls granted by Allah, and
the daughters of your paternal uncles and aunts, and of your maternal uncles and aunts, who
have migrated with you, and the believing woman who gives herself to the Prophet, if
the Prophet may desire her. This privilege is for you only, not for the other believers
. . . . (Maududi vol. 4, p. 111, emphasis added).

This verse says that besides those women whose dower Muhammad paid, he may marry
slave-girlsthat is, he may have sex with them (see this article
for this Quran-inspired immorality). Maududi references three slave-girls taken during raids,
and Mary the Copt, a gift from an Egyptian ruler.
Muhammad had sex with her, and there does not seem to be a political need for this. Second,
Muhammad may marry his first cousins, and Maududi cites a case in which this happened.
Third, if a believing woman offers herself to Muhammad, and he desires her, then he may
marry her (Maududi vol. 4, note 88).

But the capstone of these "special" marriages occurs when Muhammad also
marries the ex-wife (Zainab) of his adopted son (Zaid). His son-in-law divorced her
with the prophet standing in the background. In fact, early Islamic sources say
that Muhammad catches a glimpse of his daughter-in-law in
a state of undress,
so he desired her. Once the divorce is final, Allah reveals to him that this marriage
between father-in-law and daughter-in-law is legal and moral in Sura 33:36-44.

This
hadith says that Muhammad used to visit nine (or eleven) wives in one night. See the parallel
hadith here,
here,
and here.

For a more thorough analysis of polygamy in the Quran, go to this
online booklet and click on Chapter 12.

See this article
on the number of wives and human sexual property Muhammad allowed himself.

Besides the previous four links, here is the back-up article.
At the end, it links to more articles on the dubious marriage and divorce of Zaid,
Zainab, and Muhammad.

3. A Muslim polygamist may simply get rid of one of his undesirable wives.

The Quran in Sura 4:129 says:

It is not within your power to be perfectly equitable in your treatment with all your
wives, even if you wish to be so; therefore, (in order to satisfy the dictates of Divine
Law) do not lean towards one wife so as to leave the other in a state of suspense.
(Maududi, vol. 1, p. 381)

Allah made it clear that the husband cannot literally keep equality between two or more
wives because they themselves cannot be equal in all respects. It is too much to demand
from a husband that he should mete out equal treatment to a beautiful wife and to an ugly
wife, to a young wife and to an old wife, to a healthy wife and to an invalid wife, and to
a good natured wife and to an ill-natured wife. These and like things naturally make a
husband more inclined towards one wife than towards the other.

This means that wives are the source of a mans inability to treat all of them
equally. One is beautiful, while another is ugly. How can Allah demand from a husband
super-human strength under changing circumstances in his wives?

Maududi continues:

In such cases, the Islamic law does not demand equal treatment between them in
affection and love. What it does demand is that a wife should not be neglected as to be
practically reduced to the position of the woman who has no husband at all. If the husband
does not divorce her for any reason or at her own request, she should at least be treated
as a wife. It is true that under such circumstances the husband is naturally inclined
towards a favorite wife, but he should not, so to say, keep the other in such a state of
suspense as if she were not his wife.

Maududi says here that the wife should not be suspended between marriage and divorce.
If the husband stays with the no-longer desirable wife, then he should treat her fairly
and provide for her.

Where may Maududi get his idea about keeping or divorcing an unattractive wife?

This article
(see "the unpleasant truth behind divorce in Sura 4:130") demonstrates that
Muhammad wanted to divorce one of his wives because she was overweight and old. Instead of
a divorce, she gave up her "turn" in the "rotation" with the prophet,
who gladly agreed with her proposal. See these three hadith
here,
here
and here.

In addition to the link to the previous article,
here is the back-up article.

2. Husbands may hit their wives even if the husbands merely fear highhandedness in
their wives (quite apart from whether they actually are highhandedas if domestic
violence in any form is acceptable).

The Quran in Sura 4:34 says:

4:34 . . . If you fear highhandedness from your wives, remind them [of the teaching
of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them. If they obey you, you
have no right to act against them. God is most high and great. (Haleem, emphasis
added)

The hadith says that Muslim women in the time of Muhammad were suffering from domestic
violence in the context of confusing marriage laws:

Rifaa divorced his wife whereupon AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi
married her. Aisha said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained
to her (Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating).
It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah's Apostle came,
Aisha said, "I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing
women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!"
(Bukhari,
emphasis added)

See this article for fuller details on wife-beating.
It clarifies many translations of the verse. At the end, it has many links to modern
interpretations of Sura 4:34 and to arguments for wife-beating today.

This article, though long, offers a clear analysis
of wife-beating, examining the hadith and other early source documents, as well as refuting
modern Muslim polemics.

This article is a superb analysis of
the subject, giving various translations of Sura 4:34. It cites the hadith and classical
commentaries and refutes modern defenses.

Finally, this article
is thorough in examining the Quran and hadith and Muslim polemics.

1. Mature men are allowed to marry prepubescent girls.

The Quran in Sura 65:1, 4 says:

65:1 O Prophet, when you (and the believers) divorce women, divorce them for their
prescribed waiting-period and count the waiting-period accurately . . . 4 And if you
are in doubt about those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, (you should know
that) their waiting period is three months, and the same applies to those who have not
menstruated as yet. As for pregnant women, their period ends when they have delivered
their burden. (Maududi, vol. 5, pp. 599 and 617, emphasis added)

Maududi correctly interprets the plain meaning of verse 4, which appears in the context
of divorce:

Therefore, making mention of the waiting-period for girls who have not yet menstruated,
clearly proves that it is not only permissible to give away the girl at this age but it
is permissible for the husband to consummate marriage with her. Now, obviously no
Muslim has the right to forbid a thing which the Quran has held as permissible.
(Maududi, vol. 5, p. 620, note 13, emphasis added)

Divorcing prepubescent girls implies marriage to them. So the fathers of prepubescent
girls may give them away, and their new husbands may consummate their marriage with them.
If Islam ever spread around the world, no one should be surprised if Quran-believing
Muslims lowered the marriage age of girls to nine years old.

This is precisely what happened in Iran
after the religious revolution of Ayatollah Khomeini. A girls marriage age was
lowered to nine years.

Why should this surprise us? After all, Muhammad was betrothed to Aisha when she was
six, and he consummated their union when she was only nine.

The hadith says:

. . . [T]hen he [Muhammad] wrote the marriage (wedding) contract with Aishah when
she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed [sic, consummated] that marriage when
she was nine years old.
(Bukhari;
since this is a serious issue, see the parallel hadith
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
and here)

This hadith demonstrates that Muhammad pursued Aisha when she was a little girl.

The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for Aishas hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said
"But I am your brother." The Prophet said, "You are my brother in Allah's
religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry."
(Bukhari;
see this hadith
that shows Muhammads dream life in regard to his pursuit of little Aisha, and
this one
and this one.
These last three links contrast with Muhammads pursuit of Aisha through her father Abu Bakr.
Apparently Muhammad did not wait for Allah to fulfill his desire for a six year old, but took
matters in his own hands.

This hadith recounts the fifty-plus-year-old Muhammads and the nine-year-old
Aishas first sexual encounter. She was playing on her swing set with her girlfriends
when she got the call.

. . . [M]y mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of
my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to
me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless
then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and
head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women
who said, "Best wishes and Allah's Blessing and a good luck." Then she entrusted
me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah's Apostle came to
me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of
nine years of age.
(Bukhari;
see a parallel hadith
here)

This hadith describes Muhammad counseling a Muslim man to marry a young virgin for the
extra thrill it gives him to fondle her, and she him.

When I got married, Allahs Apostle said to me, "What type of lady have
you married?" I replied, "I have married a matron." He said, "Why,
dont you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?" Jabir also said:
Allahs Apostle said, "Why didnt you marry a young girl so that you might
play with her and she with you?"
(Bukhari)
See parallel hadith
here
and here.

The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were Junub. During the
menses, he used to order me to put on an Izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to
fondle me. While in Itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I
used to be in my periods (menses).
(Bukhari)

For more evidence on this most outlandish of Muhammads domestic acts even for
seventh-century Arabia, readers should refer to this article.

This article
responds to Muslim defenses of this indefensible Quranic permission.

This summary
of a news reports reveals Pakistan lowering the marriage age to twelve for a girl.

According to this report
an ethnic minority in China allows marriages for girls at nine years old. The report says that Islam
has influenced this minority and practice.

This is a great article analyzing
the marriage age of women in the Bible.

Conclusion

The nightmare must end for women in Islamic countries.

But the political and legal hierarchies in the Islamic world do not seem ready to reform
on womens rights. Here is a 1998 interview
with Shirin Ebadi, one of the first female judges in Iran. She correctly sees abuses in Iranian
law, which favors men. However, what has been done about these abuses?

Zohreh Arshadi "was a practising lawyer in Iran prior to her forced exile to
Europe. She is currently an advocate in France and is active in human rights and
especially of the rights of women. She has been especially active in defence of the rights
of women in Iran." She reports
on the inequities in Iranian law as it pertains to women:

The Islamic punishments have encouraged a culture of violence against women, especially
within the family and has spilled into violence against children. This has been commented
upon by many within the country . . . The fact that men receive a lighter punishment if
they commit a violence against women undoubtedly encourages such violence. We saw how
women could be killed with impunity during alleged adultery. Stoning to death for
adultery, although technically admissible for both sexes, has also been carried out mainly
against women.

Though these two examples come from Iran, they could multiply throughout the Islamic
world. However, the legal hierarchies understand the cost of reform: abandoning many
verses in the Quran and many passages in the hadith, and this they cannot do.

A sign of hope? The Iraqi Constitution,
so far, says that 25% of the seats in the Parliament are specified for women. So maybe
reform can be encouraged in a fledgling democracy.

But if Islamic nations, especially those who follow sharia (Islamic law) closely,
refuse to reform, then the second best strategy must be played out. Islam must never be
allowed to impose its sharia system of "justice" anywhere in the West and around
the world. No sharia courts should be permitted outside of the Islamic world. The
Quranthe ultimate source of shariaoppresses women specifically and people
generally.

The Islamic holy book is too patriarchal and culture-bound to be relevant to the new
millennium.

This present article has two companion top ten lists:
here and here. All three lists
demonstrate Islamic harshness and violenceespecially six hundred years after Jesus
came and showed us a better way.

Jesus saves. Muhammad oppressed.

Supplemental Material

The readers may go to these three sites for other translations of the Quran:
this one has multiple translations;
this one has three; and this
conservative translation
is subsidized by the Saudi royal family.

A good online resource for the historical context of a sura is
here,
where Maududi provides excellent background material.

Part One of an article, leading to two
other parts, is one of the best and most thorough discussions of women in Islam. It analyzes
many Quranic verses, hadith passages, and modern Islamic views, more than this top ten list
can cite and analyze. For fair-minded readers, the three-part article is a convincing assessment,
leading to one conclusion: Islam dishonors and even abuses women in many areas of life,
according to the original source documents of Islam. If Muslim polemicists and missionaries
have time on their hands, they should attempt to refute these articles instead of this top ten list,
which is only a summary of many other articles and links, like this three-parter.

This short booklet
has an excellent overview on Islam and womens role.

This news report
states that women in Pakistan have lost the fight to reform rape laws. The report says:

Statutes known as the Hudood ordinances, based on sharia law, currently operate in Pakistan.
They require a female rape victim to produce four male witnesses to corroborate her account,
or she risks facing a new charge of adultery.

Most women refuse to report a rape for fear they will be treated as a criminal.

Under current laws, a victim risks courting punishment if she reports a rape allegation
as the Hudood ordinances criminalise all extra-marital sex.

A woman who fails to prove that she was raped could then be charged with adultery
under the same legislation.

According to a 2002 report by the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan,
a woman is raped every two hours and gang raped every eight hours.

However, because of social taboos, discriminatory laws and victimisation of victims by police,
campaigners say that the scale of rape is almost certainly higher.

Why must the (raped) woman bring four witnesses? The Quran in Sura 24:4 says:

And those who accuse chaste women, and produce not four witnesses, flog them
with eighty stripes, and reject their testimony forever, they indeed are the Fasiqun
(liars, rebellious, disobedient to Allah).

Evidently, if a woman cannot produce four witnesses, then she must be whipped or flogged.

MEMRI TV reports
that Saudi TV aired a talk show that discussed this issue. Scrolling three-fourths of the way down
the link, the readers can see an Islamic scholar holding up sample rods that husbands may use
to hit their wives.

Memri TV has a transcript
of an Iraqi cleric who says that certain nations allow husbands to beat their wives and do
not protest it. On the other hand, Islamic societies provide guidelines, such as not
hitting on the face and not severely.

Memri TV also has a video clip
and transcript of Sheik Yusouf al-Qaradhawi who made commotion in London for opposing
homosexuals and advocating wife beating. He says that wife beating is not done by the
"best" among the Muslims. Reply: But why is it enshrined in the eternal word
of Allah? Muslims constantly bring up the beating done with a toothpick. A toothpick in
Muhammad's day was something like a thin branch or long twig. Granted, it could not kill,
but it could inflict pain. No one should beat his wife, even threaten to beat her. Why
cannot Muslims see this? The Quran says it is legitimate. Of course, he blames the
"Zionist lobby" for any persecution he believes that he suffered. This is
also irrational.

MEMRI TV has a video clip
and a transcript of an Egyptian cleric who says that a man may kill his wife if he catches
her in the act of adultery (in flagrante delicto), but his murder of her must take place
within a short time of catching her. His punishment is reduced to a mere misdemeanor,
which carries a light sentence. The wife, on the other hand, if she kills her husband
immediately after the act, does not get a reduced sentence. Why not? The other woman
in bed with the first woman's husband may be one of his wives.

MEMRI TV has a transcript
of a Bahraini cleric outlining the rules for wife-beating. Apparently, it never occurs
to these clerics that this practice is wrong for all times and all places. Bluntly said,
Muhammad was misguided in Sura 4:34.

MEMRI TV also provides a transcript
of a woman reformer in Saudi Arabia who says women should have more rights. Her battle is
noble, but she is fighting uphill.

MEMRI TV has a video clip
and a transcript showing a Saudi cleric, a member of the Shura Council, arguing for the
rights of women to drive cars. The tone of the exchange reveals that the moderate cleric
(moderate on this issue at least) is fighting an impossible battle.

However, MEMRI TV has a video clip
and a transcript of another Saudi cleric arguing against giving women the right to drive cars.

This present article criticises Amina Wadud's shaky exegesis of Sura 4:34, but this
report
shows her leading Muslim prayers for men and women in a church. (Muslims were only able to
prevent it from happening in a mosque, but object against her leading prayers anywhere in
front of a mixed congregation). The report cites other women who have done this, as well.
It also reports on Muslim reactions to this new development. Further discussion and links
regarding Amina Wadud's move are found in the Index to Islam
on this site.

The man designated by Irans hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as his
Minister of Justice vowed
that "improperly-veiled women" will be treated as if they had no Islamic veil at all.

Jamal Karimi-Rad told the local press, "Being improperly veiled and not wearing
a veil are no different. When it is clear from the appearance of a woman that she has
violated the law, then the crime is obvious and law enforcement agents can take legal
measures against her".

"Crimes such as mal-veiling or other prohibited acts, which happen before the eyes
of a law enforcement agent, are evident crimes and must be dealt with in accordance with
the law", Karimi-Rad said.

Sharia oppresses women because it offers them no freedom of choice. If a Muslim woman
volunteers to wear a veil or head covering, then that is her prerogative. However, she
should be free not to wear one, without being punished as a criminal.

Following are excerpts from a TV debate on women appearing on Saudi TV,
which aired on LBC TV on March 25, 2007.

Interviewer: Does the appearance of Saudi women on TV run counter to Islamic law?

Saudi cleric Nasser Al-Huneini: What we want is for women [to reveal] their culture and intellect.
We want women to play a role in the development of society. But a woman who insists upon appearing on TV
insists upon showing her body. Why do we act unjustly towards women by saying that we can only benefit from
them by presenting them to people this way?

[...]

Interviewer: How did you feel when you read about the debate in the Saudi Shura Council
about the appearance of Saudi women in the media?

Saudi newscaster Buthayna Nasser: I felt a sense of injustice and indignation, of course.

Nasser Al-Huneini: On the issue of the hijab, all religious scholars are in agreement that if revealing
a woman's face might lead to temptation and other things, it is forbidden. In addition, even when they permitted
the revealing of the woman's face, they placed restrictions on this. Even Sheik Al-Albani did so. They stated
that only the face and the palms may be exposed. The woman is not allowed to expose her neck or her hair.
She is not allowed to appear with make-up or jewelry. The religious scholars have all agreed upon this.

[...]

Buthayna Nasser: Sir, when I appear on TV, and when I claim my right to play a role
in this professional field, I demand that my face, which constitutes my identity, be seen. Under no
circumstances am I prepared to allow my identity to be obliterated.

[...]

Who are these people who wish to decide for me how I should behave? Why do you treat me
as less qualified just because I am a woman? Why is there always a male voice deciding how I
should behave? The Lord created me equal to you in my duties, punishment, and reward.
When you fast, I fast. When you pray, I pray. When you steal, your hand is cut off, and when I steal,
my hand is cut off. This is the greatest evidence that I am not less qualified. I know what I am doing,
and I know how to maintain my honor.
(Source)

In March 2004, Homa Arjomand, coordinator of the campaign to stop a sharia court in Canada,
delivered this
speech outlining the abuses that inhere in Islamic law, pertaining to women. Needless
to say, sharia favors mens rights excessively, at the expense of womens rights.
Arjomand tells the story of a sixteen-year-old who was forced to marry a
twenty-nine-year-old and suffered physical abuse at his hands. How could this abuse be
otherwise, when Allah commanded it in the first place?

Warning! This report
has a photo of a Muslim woman in Denmark getting murdered by her brother in an "honor"
killing.

Copyright by James Malcolm Arlandson. Originally published at
americanthinker.com,
this article was slightly edited for Answering Islam.