If you read my post below, it outlines why I don't think you've addressed the concerns of editors as expressed in the original video.

But I'll add this here since I think it underscores the debate:

[Philip Hodgetts]"I then pointed out that those who are using FCP X are reporting that it is much faster for the work they're doing than the same work in FCP 7."

This seems an odd point of departure for considering NLEs.

Two year old software? It is not a continuation as many people are so careful to point out. Why not compare to the other options out there? I suppose it was the comparison that "a lot of people you knew" were making, but you should probably consider a larger perspective on a post that asks if FCPX is "favoured" on a blog about "The present and future of post production business and technology".