Michael Gazzaniga Argues That Cognitive Functions are Separate from Social

Cognitive neuroscientist Michael Gazzaniga argues that there is no need for a discussion of free will in relation to the mechanisms of the brain. One of the leading researchers in his field, Michael Gazzaniga outlines the antiquated nature of the concept of free will by articulating the new understanding of the human brain. In the pursuit of understanding the human brain, scientists are continually learning the ways in which we produce our cognition, perception and consciousness, which itself does not need something independent of it, such as the notion of free will.

Michael Gazzaniga defines freewill as the idea of personal responsibility, which should happen on a social level. He dispels the common misconception of the link through the use of a metaphor: by studying how a car works, you are not preparing yourself to understand traffic, as that happens on a different level of understanding. Similarly, breakthroughs in the world of neuroscience won't interfere with the fact that taking responsibility in any kind of social network is done at the social level.

Michael Gazzaniga sums up his point of view when he states, "brains are automatic, but people are free."
Stats for The Brain and Free Will Trending: Older & ChillyTraction:268 clicks in 178 w Interest: > 3 minutes Concept: Michael GazzanigaRelated: 13 examples / 10 photosSegment: Neutral, 18-35
Comparison Set: 5 similar articles, including: the neuroscience of love, the process of feeling, and the placebo effect.