Blockchain Energizer – Volume 36

Friday, September 28, 2018

There is a lot of buzz around blockchain technology and its potential to revolutionize a wide range of industries from finance and health care to real estate and supply chain management. Many institutions and companies are forming partnerships to explore how blockchain ledgers and smart contracts can be deployed to manage and share data, create transactional efficiencies, and reduce costs.

EDF Energy, UK Power Reserve, and Electron Complete the First Blockchain-based Capacity Market Trade in the United Kingdom.

Earlier this month, UK Power Reserve, a developer of small-scale, flexible power generation based in the Midlands, England, purchased a capacity market obligation contract from EDF Energy, which is Great Britain’s largest electricity supplier by volume, using Electron’s flexibility trading platform. By the terms of the agreement, UK Power Reserve will take responsibility from EDF Energy to provide two megawatts of electricity capacity. The UK capacity market aims to ensure sufficient firm capacity at times when there is a high risk of a system stress event.

According to Electron, its blockchain-based platform is designed to facilitate a variety of energy flexibility trades and provides several advantages for parties trading in capacity contracts. First, the platform can reduce settlement time, which may require up to five days using current practices. Second, the platform automates compliance checks by incorporating the capacity market’s rules into a smart contract, thereby improving the efficiency of such reviews. Third, the platform provides a transparent and immutable record of each capacity trade, which facilitates auditing and compliance while promoting data integrity.

Blockchain-in-energy applications are progressing quickly in the United Kingdom — faster than innovation in the United States. As the U.K. market infrastructure scales and matures, the lessons learned will provide valuable insight for U.S. industry participants and regulators considering similar applications in the United States.

The Grant County Public Utility District (“Grant County”) raised electricity rates for cryptocurrency miners in August. Starting on April 1, 2019, small-scale miners will face an increase of 13.7 cents/kilowatt hour, and large-scale operations will pay an additional 7.9 cents/kilowatt hour. These rates may triple miners’ electricity bills. One of the Grant County commissioners has argued that the new rate increases are necessary because cryptocurrency mining is risky and unregulated. Chelan County Public Utility District (“Chelan County”) has proposed an 8.5 cent/kilowatt hour increase for cryptocurrency miners operating out of residential buildings and a 6 cent/kilowatt hour increase for miners in commercial or industrial settings. If approved, Chelan County’s rates would also take effect on April 1, 2019, and would double the rates compared to non-mining residential and commercial customers.

Chelan and Grant counties have wrestled with responding to the ever-growing presence of cryptocurrency miners in their jurisdictions, as we have previously discussed here, here, here, and here. Chelan County has issued multiple moratoriums on electricity demands from cryptocurrency miners and has shutdown unauthorized miners, citing public safety risks caused by overtaxing the grid. Other Washington counties, like Franklin County, have sought to curb cryptocurrency miners’ energy demands for fear of significant rate increases to non-miners and grid security (see here).

While the predominant cryptocurrencies have yet to shift from the consensus protocol “Proof-of-Work” to something less energy-intensive, the chorus to do so is growing. For example, momentum is growing within the Ethereum community to make at least temporary adjustments to the Ethereum consensus protocol to undermine the mining ability of “application-specific integrated circuits” (“ASICs”) designed to mine Ether, Ethereum’s native digital token. A byproduct of doing so would be a decrease in the amount of electricity used to mine Ether because the modified protocol would enable less energy-intensive equipment to be more effective mining tools than ASICs. For the time being, areas like Chelan and Grant counties, where electricity is cheap and the climate is cool, will have to continuing developing policy responses to mitigate the potential consequences of cryptocurrency mining.

Accenture and SAP Collaborate to Design a Cloud-based Blockchain Solution for Upstream Oil and Gas Operations.

Accenture and SAP are developing the “SAP S/4HANA Cloud” solution to streamline oil and gas companies’ upstream operations by utilizing artificial intelligence and blockchain to automate various backroom tasks such as asset management and logistics. The companies are coordinating with various industry participants to ensure the solution meets the industry’s needs.

By using blockchain and artificial intelligence, Accenture and SAP aim to improve the oil and gas industry’s visibility into day-to-day operations and to more efficiently and effectively conduct those operations with more accurate and secure data. Moreover, industry participants anticipate cost savings due to increased “flexibility” that a cloud-based system can provide. This application leverages several of blockchain’s key benefits: improved efficiency in executing backroom operations, greater transparency into day-to-day operations, and improved capacity to make strategic decisions due to quality data collection.

Buck Endemann is a partner in the firm’s San Francisco office, where he is a member of the energy practice group. He provides comprehensive counseling on energy, infrastructure and remediation projects, including advice on air, water and waste compliance issues, and represents clients in related litigation.

Mr. Endemann has extensive experience on the commercial, land use, and regulatory aspects of renewable energy and infrastructure projects throughout the Western United States, with an emphasis on California. He has a particular expertise...

Benjamin Tejblum is an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office and focuses his practice on energy and infrastructure projects and transactions. Mr. Tejblum’s clients include electric utilities, electric transmission owners, independent power producers, power marketers, and public utility holding companies that are active in the electricity markets in the United States. Mr. Tejblum regularly represents clients before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and has counseled clients on matters involving mergers and acquisitions, interconnection procedures and agreements, transmission rates and cost allocation, and market-based sales of energy. Mr. Tejblum also counsels energy start-up companies on a variety of regulatory matters.

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558 Telephone (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.