Navigation

User login

Please go to LegalSlave.com for the latest information and action plan, as that is the best way to get an accurate summary. Come back here afterward to read up on the history and myriad supporting evidence of judicial misconduct. It is NOT too late for restitution, but only if the people demand it!

Article written by Carey Branstetter
In a pending civil lawsuit in a Texas Federal Court, a constitutional nightmare is occurring that could have ominous consequences for all Americans. ...

There has been excellent coverage on the case over the last 3 years while this site has been in low power mode.
Now is the time to reinforce your interest in this case and get active again. Enough news and interest has accumulated over the last few years to make this a great comeback story for overcoming soft and continual tyranny. Read up today and watch as this righteous man, although being stuck down 7 times, rise again! (Pr 24:16)

Dallas Judges, Trickle-Down Tyranny has left a mark on the soul of Dallas.
Judicial corruption in Dallas is an example of what happens when people FORGET WHO THEY ARE.
Federal courts in Dallas destroyed the life of local citizen Jeff Baron ... one of our very own.
Please come hear all about this tonight and help form a circle of action to push back this tyranny!

The Court of Appeals has ruled that the receivership over Jeff was “abuse of (the judge’s) discretion”.

The ruling “reverses” the receivership that has left Jeff without his civil rights and assets for over two years. According to the ruling, Jeff’s freedom to travel, to enter into transactions and to own possessions will "soon" be restored, although he is left penniless. Presumably, his right to hire a lawyer will also be restored, but does not seem to be left with any money to do that. The diabetes research trust that Jeff founded also appears to be left without any funds.

The Federal Ethics Center urges Congress to hold hearings on Jeff's case and others. The letter addressed to Members of Congress is available to read at the FederalEthicsCenter.com website. (website is currently offline).

In a grand finale', on January 31, 2012, Judge Furgeson granted Peter Vogel's request to sell the remaining assets in the trust Jeff established to fund diabetes research. These assets, valued by Vogel at $60 million, are ordered sold for 2 cents on the dollars, in secret sales to undisclosed buyers. Insiders? The proceeds of over $ 1.2 million, from the trust's liquidation (valued by the adversaries at over $60 million) will go right into the bulging pockets of Mr. Vogel and his associates. Mr. Vogel's victims now include the millions of diabetes suffers whose lives would have been bettered through the contributions from this trust. The related documents are listed below:

As reported at SCJustice.com, the Judges "deployed nearly a dozen U.S. Marshals to barge into the homes of Mr. Barons' friends, family and acquaintances, intimidating, harassing anyone associated with Mr. Baron. Unbelievably, the Marshals, controlled by these judges, were instructed to defame Mr. Baron by making various allegations to Mr. Baron's acquaintances and neighbors. "These are the the most ludicrous allegations I have heard of and clearly retaliation for Mr. Baron's whistle blowing" says SCJustice.com.

Attorney James Eckels, former lawyer for Jeff Baron and Quantec, LLC, turned co-conspirer has been charged with criminal wiretapping, invasion of privacy, and breach of fiduciary duty by another former client. Chris Faulkner, Eckels' former client sued Eckels for breach of duty and criminal wiretapping. Faulkner is the owner of Cassiopia Internet (A/K/A CI Host) where Eckels is general counsel.

"The suspension of Mr. Baron’s constitutional rights and seizure of his assets has absolutely no basis in law and is a gross violation of the US Constitution. . . .The District Court’s order appointing receiver was issued without due process for a clearly improper and unconstitutional purpose. The damages being inflicted upon Mr. Baron by virtue of the order are very real, harsh, irreparable and immediate."

”My concern is that the Fifth Circuit has to make a choice. Do they acknowledge that there are a bunch of dishonest attorneys who have tried, literally, to conspire together to steal money from Jeff? Or, do they throw Jeff under the bus to 'protect' the 'good name' of the legal profession?"

Article written by John W. Toothman, commenting on a story published by tabloid, "Texas Lawyer", regarding Jeff's case. Mr. Toothman is a lawyer and co-author of "Legal Fees: Law & Management" and is also the author of blog.civiliansguidetolawyers.com

Normally a client may hire and fire lawyers at will, subject only to the lawyer agreeing to be retained. If there’s a dispute over the fees, it gets resolved in the normal course in a court proceeding or perhaps by a special fee arbitration proceeding. But the claims of lawyers for payment of their fees are not special, although in bankruptcy, for example, certain claims do have priority otherwise no one would take on bankruptcy cases.

When even the most basic evidence is examined, it is clear that Jeff paid his lawyers in full pursuant to the terms of their engagement agreements. The groundless nature of the claims are from attorneys’ own documentation and sworn testimony:

Attorney Stanly Broome wants more than the $10,000.00 per month capped fee he was paid. His claim is that his contract does not contain any term limiting the amount of fees which may be incurred by the attorneys in any month. However, Broome’s assertion is so groundless that it is hard to imagine anyone making it with a straight face. Broome’s contract contains a clear provision expressly limiting the amount of fees which may be incurred by the attorneys to $10,000.00 per month.

In the dispute that preceded the receivership—a dispute that lasted five years,Jeff, Ondova, the diabetes research trust, and several separate companies were forced to defend numerous suits in federal and state court in multiple jurisdictions (California, US Virgin Islands, Texas, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals-which ruled in Jeff's favor) brought by Krishan/Netsphere/MacPete. It appeared that Krishan/MacPete’s tactic was to file an abundance of lawsuits in hopes that Jeff would not be able to sustain the assault and bankrupt Jeff.

The trustee of the research trust insisted on independent counsel for the trust and trust companies; therefore, the number of attorneys required to defend the suits was very large. Prior to Judge Furgeson’s court where the receivership was initiated, Jeff and the defendants were successful in every suit.

Victim Blaming is an age-old psychological tactic used by wrongdoers, including some governments, to demonize their victims .In doing so, the perpetrator deflects responsibility of his wrongful acts and directs responsibility to the victim, himself. In its sinister form, the perpetrator utilizes propaganda, lying and fabricating events to make the victim appear evil.