Divide and Conquer, AL East

The Perpetual Rebuilders

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

As J.P. Arencibia, the Toronto Blue Jays’ highly-touted first-round pick from 2007, dug in against Justin Verlander in the eighth inning of Saturday’s game, he wasn’t the batter anyone would have picked to spoil a chance at perfection with patience. In his young major-league career, he had walked just eight times in 123 plate appearances, and in the minors, he was a free-swinger known more for his home runs than his patience.

What followed was an epic battle, as Arencibia fended off a pitcher who was perfect to that point and facing just his 23rd Blue Jay with one out in the eighth inning. The Tigers flamethrower jumped ahead quickly with three foul balls, mixing his 99-mph heat with a devastating curve. Arencibia didn’t give in, taking ball one low and away and ball two (another heater) just off the inside of the plate. Four balls later, the count still stood at 2-2 when Verlander unleashed another errant breaking ball. Arencibia fouled back the 11th pitch of the at-bat before Verlander missed the outside corner by a whisper or two. The Blue Jays had their lone baserunner of the night.

Three pitches later, Arencibia was erased. Edwin Encarnacion knocked into an inning-ending double play, and Verlander would go on to complete a 27-batter no-hitter against a Blue Jays team struggling to find its groove. In the final frame, the Detroit right-hander hit 100 on the gun, and his final pitch was an unfair 88-mph slider.

The Jays, 3-4 this week after a 10th-inning walk-off win against the Red Sox last night, aren’t really anywhere right now. The club is 16-20, even with the Orioles in last place. Columnist Jeff Blair recently called 2011 a rebuilding year for the Jays, but it seems that every year is a rebuilding year in Toronto.

Once upon a time, before the strike, before the Expos decamped for the United States, before the Yankees and Red Sox emerged as division titans, the Jays were the darlings of the American League. Playing in a state-of-the-art stadium with a retractable roof and featuring a team that would make the ALCS four times in five years while winning two World Series championships, the Jays became the first team in baseball to draw four million fans in back-to-back seasons.

Now, the Jays are mired in mediocrity with a payroll pushing $80 million, and searching for a plan. Outside of a 67-94 showing in 2004, they’ve neither won more than 88 games nor lost more than 87 since 1996, the first full season after the strike. The Canadian club squeaked into second place in 2006 but has generally been comfortable in no better than third. Since the rise of the Rays, the Jays have seemingly slipped into a permanent fourth-place position. They wear it like a comfortable shawl.

The Blue Jays shouldn’t be this non-descript or stingy. They play in a large metro area and are now the sole representative of Canada in the majors. Their owner, Rogers Communications, is Canada’s largest wireless provider and a $20 billion company. Absent Tampa Bay’s extra two percent, it might cost $130 million to compete with the Red Sox and Yanks, but that is a total the Jays’ owners could easily afford.

So who are the Jays? They seem to be a power-hitting team that also relies on speed. They have some decent starting pitching and a bullpen that alternates between hot and cold, as bullpens are wont to do. Of course, they also feature the player who has now launched 60 home runs in his last 162 games, but Jose Bautista serves as the only true offensive threat in a lineup marred by injuries.

The Jays have 37 home runs, but they lack on-base skills. Entering last night’s game, the club had drawn 122 walks, largely thanks to Bautista’s 31 free passes. Somehow, Jon Lester and the Red Sox issued seven walks to a team with a .318 on-base percentage, and only one of those went to Bautista. He’s the only player on the team with an on-base percentage above .345 (or above .500, for that matter).

In addition to solo homers, the Jays’ game plan seemingly revolves around speed, which also depends on getting on base. The club has attempted 51 steals, 38 of which have been successful. A 75 percent success rate is less than optimal, but Toronto’s 4.3 equivalent baserunning runs place the team atop the American League.

Last night’s game was indicative of these contradictions. With one out in the third inning, Rajai Davis was caught stealing home on what seemed to be a missed squeeze by Yunel Escobar, but in the bottom of the 10th, Davis singled and stole second and third on Jason Varitek and Matt Albers before scoring on a sac fly. The lineup also lofted three balls over the Rogers Centre walls. If the Jays could figure out a way to combine that kind of speed, power, and patience every day, they could emerge from the middle, or bottom, of the AL East pack.

For now, the Jays’ main allure is Bautista. With 11 home runs and a .519 on-base percentage, he is the Blue Jays’ offense, but that shouldn’t stop anyone from enjoying the show. Toronto fans long accustomed to looking up at the AL East need something to cheer for. After all, 2011 is a rebuilding year. They all are.

* * *

Last night, Kyle Farnsworth issued his first walk of the season. Unfortunately for the streaking Tampa Bay Rays, it came with the bases loaded in the bottom of the ninth in a tie game. Before that series of unfortunate events, the Rays, once 1-8, had been tied with the Yankees atop the division. They’re now 19-7 in their last 26, with the pitching to back it up.

The Rays benefited from one of the more amusing/annoying loopholes in league rules this weekend. B.J. Upton drew a two-game suspension for an outburst on Wednesday and knew he would have to serve it. However, he appealed it on Friday so he could play the weekend in Camden Yards. In Baltimore, he has posted a career .297/.370/.535 line, but in Cleveland, the Rays’ next stop, he has hit just .180/.241/.200. Of course, he went 7-for-14 with a home run and three doubles during the Rays’ sweep of Baltimore, and now he’s serving out the suspension. Sometimes, the extra two percent apparently involves making good use of MLB’s disciplinary procedures.

* * *

The Yankees, meanwhile continued a ho-hum march to 20-13 with a subpar 3-3 week that included losing three of four to the Tigers in Detroit. Once they escaped Comerica and found themselves in a hitter-friendly stadium, the bats came alive. On Sunday, they downed the Rangers 12-5, and the story of the game focused on the rebirth of the captain.

For the first time in over 250 at-bats, Jeter hit a home run, and then an inning later, he hit another. After his third straight multi-hit game last night, Jeter is now batting .283/.336/.354. That triple-slash line is still a far cry from his career norms, but he’s showing signs of life. What happens next is anyone’s guess; this weekend, Jeter passed Cal Ripken to claim the record for most games played at shortstop for a single team, so age- and position-wise, he’s in uncharted territory.

* * *

Up in Boston, the Red Sox just can’t get to that elusive .500 mark. They went 3-4 this week against the Angels, Twins, and Blue Jays and played three extra-inning games. Attempting to even the team’s record last night, staff ace Lester tied a career high with five walks as the team fell to 17-19.

On the bright side, Adrian Gonzalez’s power stroke has returned. After launching just one home run in April, he’s hit five—including two last night—in May. Three of the blasts have been of the opposite-field variety, including one that cleared the Green Monster this weekend. At the same time, Jed Lowrie has slumped. After a 1-for-4 showing last night, he’s just 10-for-his-last-47. Sox fans were also thrilled by the arrival of Jose Iglesias, a Cuban shortstop with a highly-regarded glove. Just 21, he posted a .531 OPS in 92 Triple-A plate appearances in April, and his next extra-base hit will be his first of the season.

* * *

With their 7-6 win over Seattle last night, the Orioles capped off a 2-4 week. At 15-19, they haven’t been as bad as they could’ve been, but going 9-18 after a 6-1 start isn’t what the franchise had in mind. For now, the plan isn’t working. The club sports the highest ERA in the American League, and its offense, infused with the veteran presences of Derrek Lee and Vladimir Guerrero, ranks among the worst in the Junior Circuit as well. It might be only early May, but it’s about time to say, “Better luck next year.”

What a glib, soulless, uninformed account of the Blue Jays. Surely BP can do better than this.

This is a team which has had its opening day lineup available in exactly ONE game this season: opening day. It's a team that, since Alex Anthopolous took over as GM, has made several excellent trades (Halladay, Morrow, Escobar, Lawrie), dumped an albatross of a contract (Wells), and improved its minor league ranking from the mid-20s to top 5.

This author seems contemptuous of the fact that the Blue Jays won't contend this year in the AL East, that they didn't spend hundreds of millions of dollars on FAs like their rivals the Red Sox. Yet he seems blithely unaware of, or unimpressed by, what they have done in the past 18 months. The season so far has been disastrous with injuries and the demotion of Snider, and yet the team is only 5 1/2 games out of first in the toughest division in baseball.

This kind of writing is so typical of the way in which the Blue Jays are represented in the American media. So ignorant, so condescending, so completely worthless. One expects better from BP.

As a big Jays fan, I didn't think the article was unfair. It could have been more forward-looking, given the farm team you mention, and that Jays ownership has in the past stated a willingness to spend, should the pieces be in place that spending would actually get us into the playoffs.

Then again, most teams think the future will be better. Most of us would have cursed an article that was not forward-looking when we were signing Wells and Hinske to 5-year deals, but that didn't exactly work out. The Jays have been middling for a long time, and the current team represents that pretty well. Anthropolous seems to have a plan, and I have lots of hope that plan will come to fruition. In the meantime, the Jays will hit for power, run and pitch well, but probably none of those things consistently enough to win the 90+ games necessary to move up a tier in the AL East.

Thank you, Mick968 for saying exactly what I was thinking. The article also ignores the Jays young starting pitching who are going through the usual growing pains of youth. In Brandon Morrow, they have a legitimate future #1 and a solid cast behind him. They just need a year or two to grow into their arms and the Jays will be serious contenders.

As for ownership, Rogers has repeatedly said that they are willing to spend with the big boys when the situation demands it. Going out and signing high priced free agents en masse is not the way the Jays have chosen to go. They will build through youth and add the bats/arms they need when their own farm system has had time to produce.

Not to pile on, but "every year seems to be a rebuilding year in Toronto" is just incredibly superficial. I wonder if JP Ricciardi meant to be "rebuilding" when he splashed out all those big contracts? When they have finished over .500 more often than not, playing the best division in baseball? Maybe it "seems like" the Jays are irrelevant if one only pays attention to the YankSox (or whoever), but if so why write about the Jays? Sorry, I can read off-hand opinions passing as "analysis" in my daily newspapers, I don't need BP for this.

I'm a huge Jays fan, but I didn't think the article was out of line. Everyone knows that the Jays have made some good moves under AA, but that a lot of work still needs to be done. And after many years of hype under JP, it's reasonable to hold off on getting excited until the team starts demonstrating consistently promising results on the field.

Were the Jays in perpetual rebuilding when they were fourth best team in the league (by BP standards) in 2008? With a little less bad luck, they would have been in the playoffs in 2008. Ben, I have read the articles you have posted here and it appears that you are an expert in the Sox and Yanks, but not much more. I know the criticism you've received here is harsh, but to me it is warranted. I know you're not going to be doing in depth stats analysis, but this piece (and some others) have just come off as lazy.

I think you guys are being a little hard on Ben. This year clearly is a rebuilding year in Toronto, and he is simply (and correctly) observing that it's been quite a while since the Jays were winners in this division. Sure, this time Anthopolis' plan might work out. It looks promising. But the future isn't what Ben's writing about here. He's empathizing with how frustrating this longtime effort to reach the next level must be for you guys.

From reading these comments, it sounds like some fans of the Blue Jays need a story with a positive spin about their team, or want no story at all. What I like about BP is that there is no overtly homer bias for any team. Are you looking for BP to become the FOX news of the baseball beat, where reinforcing biases and spinning stories is more important than objective reporting? Personally, I am glad that BP is not in the business of only reporting events through rose-colored glasses. BP has featured plenty of negative reporting on my favorite team recently, and I welcome reading the that viewpoint (and feel it is deserved). I get plenty of positive spin on my favorite team from poorly-informed local sports talk show hosts and callers, but I subscribe to BP because I am willing to pay for something more.

Not really. This has been going on for the duration of this column. Kind of openly dismissive and neglectful of much of the context of events, without really hinting at much deeper analysis of why performance has been poor, or thoughts as to direction.