It should be known by the reader, that the following work wasundertaken and begun about the year 1733 or 1734, at which timeDr. Whitby's Discourse on the Five Points was reprinting, judgedto be a masterpiece on the subject, in the English tongue, andaccounted an unanswerable one ; and it was almost in the mouthof every one, as an objection to the Calvinists, Why do not yeanswer Dr. Wliitby ? Induced hereby, I determined to give itanother reading, and found myself inclined to answer it, andthought this was a very proper and seasonable time to engage insuch a work.In the year 1735, the First Part of this work was published, inwhich are considered the several passages of Scripture made useof by Dr. Whitby and others in favour of the Universal Scheme,and against the Calvinistical Scheme, in which their argumentsand objections are answered, and the several passages set in a just and proper light. These, and what are contained in thefollowing Part in favour of the Particular Scheme, are extractedfrom Sermons delivered in a Wednesday evening's lecture.The Second Part was published in the year 1736, in which theseveral passages of Scripture in favour of special anddistinguishing grace, and the arguments from them, arevindicated from the exceptions of the Arminiani, and particularlyfrom Dr. Whitby, and a reply made to answers and objections tothem.The Third Part was published in 1737, and is a confutation of thearguments from reason used by the Arminians, and particularly byDr. Whitby, against the above doctrines ; and a vindication of such as proceed on rational accounts in favour of them, in which it

appears that they are no more disagreeable to right reason thanto divine revelation ; to the latter of which the greatest deferenceshould be paid, though the Rationalists of our age too muchneglect it, and have almost quitted it ; but to the law and to thetestimony, if they speak not according to this word'it is becausethere is no light in them.In this part of the work is considered the agreement of thesentiments of Mr. Hobbes and the Stoic philosophers with thoseof the Calvinists, in which the difference between them isobserved, and the calumny removed ; to which is added, aDefence of the'Objections to the Universal Scheme, taken fromthe prescience and the providence of God, and the case of theHeathens.The Fourth Part was published m 1738, in which the sense of theancient writers of the Christian Church, before the times of Austin,is given ; the importance and consequence of which is shown,and that the Arminians have very little reason to triumph on thataccount.This work was published at a time when the nation was greatlyalarmed with the growth of Popery, and several learnedgentlemen were employed in preaching against some particular points of it ; but the author of this work was of opinion, that theincrease of Popery was greatly owing to the Pelagianism,Arminianism, and other supposed rational schemes men run into,contrary to divine revelation, This was the sense of our fathers inthe last century, and therefore joined these and Popery together in their religious grievances they were desirous of havingredressed ; and indeed, instead of lopping off the branches of Popery, the axe should be laid to the root of the tree, Arminianismand Pelagianism, the very ufe and soul of Popery.